The Sun. — London, England, 1835-01-24 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. It gives us great pleasure to perceive that the para mount question of Church Reform begins to occupy a large share of the attention of those who formerly were anxious to avoid the subject, and to engage them in a course of earnest and useful discussion. An able contemporary of yesterday evening, anticipates an extensive and satisfactory measure from Sir Robert Peel's Government, framed with the active concur rence of the Bishops, and presents its own conjec tures as to what the outline of the Bill is likely to contain, with some observations upon the nature of those improvements which it ought to establish in the Church of England. So far as the plan goes, which has been chalked out by our contemporary, it is entitled to public approbation and support, and in some of its essential features differs little from that which was, though we acknowledge less distinctly, traced out in the Times of yesterday. It is perfectly true, that to render religious instruction accessible, and at the same time welcome, to all classes of the people is the one great object of a Church Establishment, and therefore of a Church Reform. But there can be no due facility of access to the means of religious instruction where there is permitted to exist a clergy in great part non-re sident. When a clergyman is suffered to hold more than a single living at a tame, he must be non-resident in one of them or the other ; and although he must employ a curate, it is to be feared that in nine cases out of ten, allowing rector and curate to be on a par in professional merit, the duty will be performed with greater zeal by the incumbent of his own parish than by a stipendiary not under his eye, and who is no more than his paid representative. In order to secure an efficient body of parochial clergy, we are so far from wishing to see the incomes of the more moderate livings diminished, that it is our anxious object to augment their revenues so as to make the remuneration of the minister bear a reasonable proportion to his la bour. It is our film belief that this end would be answered by gradually converting to the endowment of new churches, or the enlargement of the salaries of ill-paid incumbents, as the case might be-Ist, whatever surplus should accrue from a revision and fresh distribution, implying also a certain curtailment, of the collective revenues of the Bishops, the average of whose incomes (with four or five exceptions) neigh`, as it appears to us, be very fairly reduced to about 5,000/. a-year ; 2d, the bulk, or by much the larger portion, of the revenueS . of Deans and Chapters, after providing for the convenient support of officiating Clergymen in the several Cathedrals, and for the pre servation of those sacred edifices in a state of perfect repair ; 3d, a considerable surplus, which we suspect might he obtained, without difficulty, from some very lucrative benefices in the hands of lay-proprietors, who contrive to pocket enormous revenues, while the Vicar has little more than the wages of a mechanic. There is no reasonable man who would insist on the cutting down of all parochial incomes to a single standard,' or to any interference with ancient boundaries either of Bishoprics or benefices, not indispensable to a more effectual attainment of the one main pur pose for which both were instituted, viz.—the diffusion of religious knowledge, and with it the improved morality of the people. But we quite agree with our contemporary before alluded to, that some Bishoprics (he says nothing of benefices in that sense) are by far too large and intractable for a single Prelate. The administration of the diocese of Ches ter is too burdensome for any Bishop ; so perhaps is that of Lincoln. In the mean time we desire to be understood as giving full credit to the Bishops for a sincere and zealous wish to bring all these questions to such an issue, as may restore and perpetuate the highest attainable degree of harmony, not only be tween the clergy of the Church of England and their congregations, but between the Church including b oth, and the great dissenting bodies of the kingdom. And if the Right Reverend Bench be now better disposed upon that subject than during the last Administration, it may be that they place confidence in the power of the existing Government to resist all efforts for the destruction of the Church : while admitting, as we are sure they ought to do, the upright intentions of the former Ministers, they dreaded the commencement of any change which the Whigs might in their weakness have been forced to leave to the revolutionary faction to finish. — Times. Without professing to be in possession of Cabinet secrets, our information leads us to believe that the de mand for the repeal of the malt tax, which has been responded from one side of the country to the other, has already caused much deliberation in the Ministry ; and we hesitate not to say that, unless Sir Robert Peel and his colleagues lay aside all the frivolous objections to the repeal of this tax, which from time to time have been put forth by their predecessors, they will have miscalculated the support they expected to receive from the country gentlemen of England. We know that one of the present objections raised against the removal of this heavy burden from the agriculturists and the in dustrious poor, is the difficulty of providing for the defi ciency of the four millions and a half which this tax pro duces; but this was one of the silly subterfuges by which the Whig Administration succeeded in again saddling the country with this crippling burden, after a vote of the House of Commons had expunged it from the Budget. But then we had a blundering Chancellor of the Exche quer, who led a servile House of Commons, whenever an attempt was made to move the reduction of the people's burdens, by talking of the breach of faith with the public creditor, or the necessity of imposing other taxes instead, whilst the reduction of the Four per Cent. Annuities into a Three-and-a-Half per Cent. Annuity was held to be no breach at all. But surely the present Chan cellor of the Exchequer does not intend to follow the weak example of his predecessor ; neither will the new House of Commons do their duty to their consti tuents if they tamely permit him. The present Admi nistration must put their shoulders to the wheel—they must not flinch from the reduction of any imposition which presses upon the industry of the people. Let them in a manly and straightforward manner begin with the malt tax ; it will be better to volunteer it when it will be received with gratitude, than to have it wrested from them by a determined House of Com mons, which will certainly be the result ; whilst their spontaneous concession of the boon will secure to them the lasting confidence of the country. The only objections which present themselves to the present Ca binet are the means by which this desirable consum mation is to be brought about. To impose other taxes in lieu would only be to shiftthe burden from the shoulders of one party to another. Let Ministers, then, meet the wishes of the country, by raising a loan of two millions and a half; this, with the boasted surplus of two millions, coupled with a just economy in the ad ministration of the finances, will meet the reduction of the four millions and a hafcaused by the repeal of the malt-tax ; and the increased capabilities of con sumption thus given to 6,500,000 of people engaged in agriculture will soon enable the Government to pay off the loan. But an objection may be started as to the principle of raising a loan for two millions and a half during a time of peace, and this, we believe, is one of the difficulties likely to be mooted in the Ca binet. We would, however, appeal to the common sense of the country, and put it fearlessly to them, whe ther it is not equally as politic, and by far more noble, to raise a trifling loan, during a time of peace, in or der to remove an odious and onerous tax, and thus to promote the profitable industry and consuming power of a large portion of the empire, as it would be to raise twenty times the sum yearly, to carry on a war for 22 years, which has been done, the justice of which has often been called in question by the ablest politicians ? The public debt, we thus maintain, has been increased for much more frivolous causes than the one we advo cate, and, as the end will just 4 the means, we trust that the Cabinet will not only adopt it, but that the Commons, by their vote, will vindicate the agricultural occupiers and peasantry from this oppressive burden. Let the evils which the beer-shop system has inflicted upon the country not only stimulate the present Admi nistration, but the Parliament, to do their duty. There then may be some hope that the country at large will rise, Phoenix-like, from the mischiefs inflicted by for mer Administrations, and thus that decided boon will be restored to the labouring classes of which they ought never to have been deprived ; in fact, • we hesi ate not to assert that the removal of this odious tax will be the precursor of a return to those happy days The counties in England and Wales have nobly re sponded to the call of their patriot King, and have even surpassed our most sanguine anticipations in the selection of men of public and private worth, to repre sent their interests in the Commons' House of Parlia ment. When, indeed, we perceived the towns through out the kingdom emancipating themselves with vigour and earnestness from the galling yoke of misrule which had been imposed on them in a moment of excitement and delusion, and vindicating at once the just preroga tives of the Crown and the real liberties of the peo ple, our fears were gradually dispelled, and we looked with anxious confidence (the struggle being one of no ordinary nature) for the con summation of our peace ful triumph, to the agricultural districts of the land, to those districts which had experienced in a more bitter degree, if possible, than their com mercial and manufacturing neighbours, the futility, the hopelessness, of relying on the protection and support of an Administration which numbered among its members an Althorp, a Palmerston, and a Brougham—a Ministry whose delusive promisea ended always in disappointment, aggravated by the sense of misplaced confidence, and betrayed trust. We purpose to lay before our readers a succinct view of the victories gained by the Conservative party in the counties throughout England and Wales, and thence to deduce such conclusions as may be generally aii:l practically useful. Nor do we imagine that we can adopt a more convenient course than that followed by us in our enumerations of the triumphs achieved in the cities and boroughs in the same part of the United Kingdom. In the last Parliament, then, the following , counties returned two Dcstructives, or pledged anti- Ministerialists :—Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, North Cheshire, South Derbyshire, South Devonshire, West Gloucestershire, South Hampshire,Hertfordshire, West Kent, South Lancashire, East Norfolk, West Suffolk, East Surrey, West Surrey, South Warwick shire, and North Wiltshire. Berkshire was repre sented by one Conservative, one who has since de clared himself favourable to the new Administration, and one Destructive. In Denbighshire, South Essex, South Leicestershire, South Northamptonshire, North Shropshire, East Suffolk, and the North Riding of Yorkshire the representation was di vided between a Conservative and a Radical. Let us now examine the changes which have taken place in each separately. In Buckinghamshire Mr. John Smith (having lost we presume that portion of his breath which was left to him after Lord John Rus sell's speech on introducing the Reform Bill), left the field, and his place (as a candidate) was supplied by Dr. Lee, who, in conjunction with Mr. Dashwood, the late member, was soundly beaten by Sir William Young and Mr. Praed, two zealous Conservatives. Mr. Eaton, a young man of high character and sta • tion in the county of Cambridge, ejects Mr. Childers, a grievous Radical, from the place usurped by him. Lord Grosvenor, the son of the Whig-Radical Mar quis of Westminster, is in spite of his amiable papa's influence, driven from North Cheshire by Sir Philip Egerton, a staunch friend of the Constitution, with out even the formality of a poll. In North Der byshire, Lord Waterpark (one of the eternal Ca vendishes, who wish to rough-ride that county) and Mr. Vernon (not one of the Cheshire Vernons) are driven from the Representation by Sir George Crewe and Sir Roger Greisley (the latter was beaten by a majority of near nine hundred in 1832), who are chosen by the free voices of the Derbyshire farmers. This is indeed a glorious victory, and will bitterly annoy the Liberal Lord Lieutenant. Sir John Buller is elected for South Devonshire, Mr. Bulteel not daring to show his face, it being univer sally acknowledged that Grildrig must have gone out had a second Conservative presented himself. In West Gloucestershire, Lord Worcester is chosen with out opposition, Lord Ducie not choosing to intrude more than one son on the yeomen of that county. In South Hampshire, Lord Palmerston and the unfoqu nate wise man of the East, once a Tory, then a Whig, and now one of the Reformers of all grades, who has been dragged through the mud by the ex-Foreign Secretary, are beaten to shivers by Mr. Fleming and Mr. Compton, Gentlemen and Conservatives (why were Mr. Lefevre and Mr. Scott suffered to walk over the course for the Northern Division ?) Poor Lord Palmerston, what will he do, odious alike to county, university, borough, and every constituency in the kingdom ? Hertfordshire returns Mr. Abel Smith, vice Sir John Sebright, a superannuated Whig, so that Lord Grimston's vote is no longer swamped by Destructives (a third Conservative might have been elected here without the slightest difficulty.) The yeo manry of West Kent have done their duty in the elec tion of Sir William Geary, a young man of whom it is impossible to speak too highly, whether with re ference to public or private worth. The " Rider to the Bill," as he is familiarly termed, has been taught a wholesome lesson. The men of South Lancashire may well be proud of their exertions. Mr. G. W. Wood, a Dissenter of the " East" school, a person only con spicuous for his violent and rancorous hatred of the Church, his vituperative powers on that subject being unredeemed by the slightest spark of talent, is dis missed from the Representation of South Lan cashire, to make room for the able, eloquent, and consistent Lord Francis Egerton, of whom the Lancastrians may indeed be proud. Nor is this all, Mr. Wilbraham, the worthy son of the excellent Lord Skelmersdale, who came forward to secure the election of his Noble Friend, is chosen as the other Representative for that division of the county, Lord Molyneux, a remarkably stupid young gentleman, whose silence in the House of Commons was as noto rious as his noisy declamation on the hustings was un meaning, being dismissed by his constituents in the teeth of all the influence exercised by that wise sup porter of the omnibus Cabinet, the brilliant Lord Sefton. In East Norfolk Mr. Wodehouse has been nobly rewarded for his manly behaviour in refusing to allow the Conservative cause to be in anywise injured by acceding to the cunning and insidious proposal of the Destructives " to allow the return of one and one." The electors of Norfolk showed their sense of his gene rous and straightforward conduct by placing him at the head of the poll, and assigning as his colleague the high principled and right-minded Lord Walpole. In West Suffolk the old Radical Members cut and run. Mr Rushbrooke, a gentleman of staunch Conservat: principles, succeeds the one, the other is replaced by Mr. Wilson, whose opposition to the Ministry will be of a very modified nature. East Surrey has com mitted the care of its interests to Captain Alsager, a fine specimen of a manly Englishman, one who shrinks not from avowing his attachment to his King and country. Had a second supporter of the Constitution been brought forward, Messrs. Beauclerk and Briscoe would not have been compelled to quarrel for the sc cond seat. West Surrey deserves the best thanks of the friends of order. Mr. Barclay, her new Repre sentative, is a thorough Conservative and an excellent man of business. Mr. Leech, and his nominee, Mr. Long, are at a terrible discount. In South Warwick shire Sir John Mordaunt, a young Baronet of sound principles and high character, is elected without oppo sition, Sir George Phillips, the late Member, conceiving " discretion to be the better part of valour" (here, likewise a second Conservative can didate would have triumphed with ease.) In South Wiltshire Sir John Astley, the friend of every successive Administration, is compelled to make way for Mr. Walter Long, the unsuccess ful candidate on Constitutional principles (in conjunc tion with Lord Douro) for North Hampshire at the last contest for that division. So much, then, for the counties which returned two Destructives at the gene ral election in 1832. Proceed we now to consider those in which the representation was divided. Berk shire has chosen Mr. Pusey in the room of Mr. Throck morton, who did not venture to the poll. The Mem bers for Denbighshire in the late Parliament were Sir when the labourer or wayfaring man needed but to ask at the gates of any decent m ansion for a gratuitous cup of that beverage, so peculiarly requisite to the frame and habits of an industrious Englishman. One word before we conclude : we believe seriously that the raising of so trifling a loan for so good a purpose would scarcely affect the public funds one per cent., and our inquiries support that opinion ; and as to the idea of the national creditor taking alarm, that borders too much upon the ridiculous to dwell upon.—Morning Herald. HE SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY, JANUARY 24, 1835. W. W. Wynne and a Mr. Biddulph, the former a Conservative, the latter a Radical. Mr. Biddulph has been beaten by a considerable majority by Mr. Bagot, a staunch friend of the Constitution, and this victory is obtained under disadvantageous circumstances, for many self-styled Conservatives gave plumpers to Sir Watkin 'Wynn instead of dividing their votes, but the Cambrian blood was up, and loyalty prevailed over hostility and neutrality. South Essex is indeed worthy to be associated with her northern neighbour. Mr. Bramston and Mr. Hall Dare are both good men and true. Mr. Halford's spirited exertions and eminent abilities will be no Longer neutralized by the radicalism of a factious col league. Had Mr. Dawson contested the representa tion with Mr. Frewcn Turner, his minority would have been in the proportion of one to seven. The Althorpean incubus is removed from South Northamp tonshire, while honesty and integrity have triumphed in the persons of Mr. Cartwright and Sir Charles Knightley (why has not Lord Brudenell a Conserva tive colleague for the Northern Division ?) Our friends in North Shropshire have not deceived us. Mr. Cotes, preferring retirement to defeat, is succeeded by Mr. Ormsby Gore, an active, zealous, and efficient defender of the Constitution. Essex, Leicestershire, and Shropshire—well, indeed, have they acted at this important moment ! In East Suffolk, Mr. Shawe makes room for Sir Charles Vere—not without a con test. The Conservative cause in that county is in debt- d to Mr. Shawe, for he has manifested its strength. Sir Charles is successful by a very large ma jority. The electors of North Lincolnshire have re deemed themselves from the disgrace of being misrepre sented by the greatest mountebank in England (Lord Brougham is on the Continent), who is beaten by Mr. Corbett. Why did not Mr. Chaplin, of Blank ney, also present himself ? the insolent attempt at monopoly by the house of Brocklesby would have thus been signally punished. Sir William Ingilby will now have time to learn that ribaldry is not wit, nor buffoonery humour. He has shared the fate of the Pahnerstons, Biddulphs, Shaves, and Dashwoods, and the other unfortunate Radicals, "quos nunc per scribere longuni est." Yet these majorities, however triumphant, and however gratifying numerically, are still more valuable when looked at with reference to their moral influence, as evincing the confidence which the well-informed and reasonable portion of the community have in their intentions of his Ma jesty's Ministers, and their reliance on the wisdom with which those intentions will be worked out to a satisfactory fulfilment. In many counties the old Members have been suffered to resume their posts without opposition, in the well-founded expectation that they will profit by the lesson taught in other places, and not offer a factious and disgraceful opposition. In Nottinghamshire Mr. De nison, in Oxfordshire Mr. Harcourt and Major Vey land, in Berkshire Mr. Walter (not to mention many other instances), declared that they were prepared to give the Ministry of the King's choice " a fair trial." Nor is it necessary to refer to the speeches of Lord Stanley and Sir James Graham, which must be fresh in the memories of our readers; while Mr. Phillips, the Member for North Leicestershire, a consistent and zealous Whig, in his address to the electors (an address honourable alike to the head and heart which dictated it), calls upon his constituents to rally round the altar and the throne, whose very existence is endangered by factious and unprincipled demagogues. If, then, our enemies expect that among " the Reformers of all grades" will be found the names we have mentioned, they are grievously mistaken. They will be numbered indeed among the Reformers, but of a very different class—the Reformers whose ob ject is not to destroy but to amend—the Reformers, at the head of whom will be found the wise, able, and honest men to whom the destinies of England are en trusted—the unflinching champions of all that is ex cellent and valuable, but the fearless purifiers of what ever is unsound and useless, in our ancient and ad mirable institutions.—Morning Post. Now that the elections are all but completed, and their result almost known to a fraction—and that frac tion of no moment, either in subtracting from the aw ful minority of the Tories, or in adding to the confirmed majority of the Reformers—the great question to be decided, for it has not yet been decided, is in what way it would be most just, most politic, and most appropriate, to oust the anti-national Administra tion, which has, by the foulest play that ever cha racterized a desperate faction, got possession of the reins of Government. The question is one of the utmost importance, and notwithstanding the decided tone of some of our contemporaries, has not yet been solved to the satisfaction of all the Reform Members of the House of Commons. Upon one point all are agreed—and that is, that the sooner his Majesty be made acquainted with the fact that the country has no confidence in his Ministers the better ; but whether this knowledge should be conveyed to him through the medium of the ejection of the Tory candidate for the Speakership, Sir Charles Manners Sutton, and the election of a liberal Speaker in his stead, has not, as vet, we will ven ture to state, been determined upon. The dif ference of opinion upon the point is not difficult of reconcilement—there being no question respecting the end to be attained, but simply respecting the means. The majority of the Reform Members, as we have every reason to believe, contend that battle ought to be given at once, by proposing an other Speaker in lieu of Sir Charles Manners Sutton, and trying, upon that point, whether the pre sent Government does, or does not, possess the con fidence of the country ; while a very large minority, on the other hand, deems the mere question of the Speak ership too unimportant to raise that of the durability of an Administration so anti-national—so opposed from previous habit and previous practice, to all just and necessary Reforms—and which would be tho roughly disgraced, both morally and politically, by an adoption of Reforms to which, as a party, it was always opposed, and on account of which, there can be no doubt, it was dismissed in anger, in fear, and in contemptuous hatred. Of this mi nority, however, and it is a large and most respecta ble minority, we can say with truth, that having the same end in view with the majority already formed— namely, that of threwing out the present Administra tion—it will, on good and satisfactory reason being shown, have no hesitation in complying with the reso lutions of the majority. Our opinion is that the question ought to be raised on the Speakership, that our friends should join heart and hand with the friends of Lord Melbourne, and the friends of Re ' form, in ousting Sir Charles Manners Sutton from the place of Speaker. The indignation of the country, as well as its determination, cannot be too soon known. —Morning Advertiser. .ve SIR JONAH BAItRINGTON'S MEMOIRS OF IRE LAND, AND TILE UNlON.—lndependently of the great histori cal and personal interest belonging to this work, of which a cheap edition is now in course of monthly publication, the pictorial embellishments render it an object of considerable attraction. Among other interesting objects in the Ist No., all of which are considered to exhibit most faithful likeness of the originals, will be found those of the Earl of Clare (Lord Chancellor), the Right Hon. Husvey Burgh, Lord Kilwarden, and the celebrated Robert Emmet ; and the 2d No., we un derstand, will contain the portraits of the celebrated and un fortunate Lord Edward Fitzgerald, of James Napper Tandy, Francis Hardy, the Right Hon. Henry Grattan, the Earl of Charlemont, the Duke of Leinster, and Sir John Blaquiere. It will thus be perceived that the six numbers in which the Work will be comprised, will present a gallery of portraits of almost all the distinguished persons who have figured in Ire land during the last fifty years. - - - - Friday morning, during a violent gale, the Mary, of Chichester, a small sloop, laden \vial stone from Bognor Rocks, for Mr. C. Cheesman, was wrecked on this beach. She was discovered about eight o'clock apparently endeavour ing to make the Chain Pier, and as she neared the shore, two men were seen upon deck, one at the helm, the other clinging to the rigging. Shortly before nine o'clock a great number of persons assembled on the cliffs, some prepared with ropes, and others with most of their clothes off, ready in the event of ac cident. The vessel bore up gallantly, but on reaching the breakers was in danger every moment of being swamped, be ing frequently buried in the surge. The men on board also threw off most of their clothes. At length the vessel was driven near the shore ; and one man, who courageously ven tured to the extremity of the groyne to render assistance, suc ceeded in casting a rope to the vessel, which was seized by the crew. At this moment a tremendous wave carried the vessel to the shore, when the men jumped out and were saved. The vessel has been considerably damaged ; but it is hoped she may be got off.—Brighton Gazette. POLICE INTELLIGENCE MANSION-HOUSE. Benjamin Isaacs, Jacob Moses, and John Gordon, were brought before the LORD MAYOR yesterday;charged upon suspicion of having robbed Abraham Simmonds , the owner of the Cutlers' Arms public-house, in Cutler-street, Houndsditch, of 430/. in bank-notes and cash, and a large quantity of valuable jewels. Mr. Simmonds stated, that between 12 and 3 o'clock on the precedinc , day, his bed room door was op ened with a key, entered by thieves, and plundered of the above men tioned property. About two months ago, the prisoner Isaacs asked him for the loan of a pair of trousers, and afterwards for the loan of a ring, and when witness lent those articles, Isaacs must have seen that he had a consi derable stock of valuable property. On Thursday, when the servant girl went up to make the beds, Isaacs followed her up stairs, and went into the club-room, and Moses, who was near the bar, began to play with witness's child, no doubt to occupy the attention of those who were to be plun pered. There were two other persons about the place at the time. After the robbery was committed, neither Isaacs nor 11loses was to be found, although messengers were sent after them. Jane Combe stated that she went up stairs at 12 o'clock to make the bed in her master's room, and she looked in at the bed-room afterwards at about 1 o'clock, and found all right, and locked the door. After she came down stairs, Isaacs walked into the kitchen, and was more than usually inquisitive. He particularly asked her • whether she was going to cook the steaks, and how long she should be cook ing. About 2 o'clock, when she had cooked the dinner, she saw Isaacs still sitting in the tap-room, where he had been for some time. Mrs. Simmonds, the wife of the complainant, stated that upon going up stairs after 2 o'clock to lie down on the bed, on account of illness, she, to her surprise, found the door of her bed-room open, and on entering the room she at once perceived that her drawers had been broken open and plundered of all the property. She was greatly terri fied, and upon going down stairs she fainted, and she be lieved that if she had looked under the bed she would have seen one of the thieves. Isaacs asked Mrs. Simmonds whether there had not been coachmen about the house in the course of the day ?j Mrs. Simmonds admitted that there were, but said she was convinced they knew nothing of the robbery. Isaacs.—l never knew any thing about the robbery. am an old customer, and there was plenty of people abou. the house at the time. Mrs. Simmonds—We missed Isaacs and Moses the moment we missed the property, and then sent the police to look for them. We have since learned that Isaacs had been in trouble about a coat, and they had both expressed themselves desirous rather of being transported than of being without mor cy. We have no reason to suspect Gordon, but he was taken into custody because he had been about the house in the course of the day, and had formerly lived with us. The LORD M Avoa deplored the loss of so much pro perty, but said he wondered bow any one could suppose that such money and goods could be safe in Cutler-street, which was infested with thieves, Gordon was discharged, and Isaacs and Moses were re manded. A well-dressed and genteel-looking Spaniard, named Fre deric Ruviales, was brought up, charged with having stolen a gentleman's cloak at the Four Swans Inn, in Bishopsgate street. The prisoner, it appeared from the evidence, walked into the coffee-room of the inn, and called for a glass of wine, for which he immediately paid. One of the waiters ob served him holding the newspaper in his hands, but occa sionally peeping over it. At last he slipped up-stairs, and soon returned with a cloak, with which he departed. A porter who followed him saw him turn his head frequently as if afraid of a pursuit, and when he saw that a man was at his heels, he turned short into the Marlborough-head pub lic-house, where he flung the cloak into a dark room, and ran up stairs. The people of the house called out to him, that there was no accommodation up stairs, and upon re turning, he was taken into custody. He pretended that he knew not a word of English, but the waiter who served him with the wine said that lie spoke the language perfectly. Upon his person there were found a purse, containing two sovereigns, and a letter from a Spanish Princess. He I told the Lord Mayor that he was wholly unacquainted with • any of the circumstances which had been stated. • The Loan MAYOR remanded him. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Yesterday a young female of genteel appearance, and very respectably attired, who gave her name Jane Silver thorn, was brought. before Mr. DYER, and charged with stealing a net cape from one of the stalls in the Soho Bazaar. The prisoner, when placed at the bar, cried bitterly, and appeared deeply affected at her situation. Jane Hook, a person who keeps a stall in the Bazaar, stated that the prisoner came to her, and expressed her wish to purchase a lady's cape. Accordingly several were shown to her, which she looked at, but ultimately declined purchasing any, and went away to another part of the Bazaar. Immediately she was gone, one of the capes, valued at half-a-guinea, was missed, and the prisoner was suspected ; and one of the inspecters of the Bazaar was sent in search of her, and she was discovered in another part, and on being taxed with havinc , committed the rob bery, she denied it ; but on being taken back to the stall and searched, the cape was found concealed under her shawl. The prisoner, on being asked what she had to say in an swer to-the charge, declared that she picked up the cape in the Bazaar. The witness said that this was impossible, for she recog nized the cape as one of those which she had shown the prisoner, and which she missed immediately after she left the stall. The prisoner was then fully committed for trial. MAR YLEB ONE. Yesterday a dwarfish costermonger, named Joe Rey nolds, with a particularly dirty face, and a nose of consider able longitudinal dimensions, appeared before Messrs. Hos- Knis and SHUTT, upon a warrant, to answer the complaint of a strapping, red-checked woman, one Betty Marshall, who, to use her own words, was shamefully and howda ciously insaulted by him on Wednesday last, under the fol lowing circumstances : It appeared from the evidence that, on the evening in question, the fair complainant happened to steer into the neighbourhood of Paddington, and being somewhat thirsty called in at the King's Arms, where she entered the tap room and seated herself by the side of a sheep's trotter wo man, who had previously taken her station on a large coal box by the fire-place ; a pot of Barclay's best was then called for, and in due form quickly introduced by a little carotty-polled waiter, who, pocketing the " needful," made his bow and retired. In a few minutes after this the de fendant came in, followed by a neat little body his wife, both of whom placed themselves within a short distance of the complainant, and indulged their fancy by imbibing a glass each of genuine pineapple rum. While this ceremony was going on, it so happened that the trotter woman, by a lapses linguae, threw out an observation derogatory to the character of the aforesaid Joe Reynolds, the defendant, who knowing nothing about the propriety of conducting himself under such circumstances with philosophic calmness, rose from the form in a most tremendous rage, and, in the vul gar tongue, abused the vender of trotters in such a " how dacioas manner as never vos," which induced the complain ant to jump up like lightning from the above-mentioned coal-box, in order to remonstrate with the pugnacious Joe ; but before she had time to give it him well with her tongue, he raised his fist and struck her on the bridge of the nose, alleging that the compliment would not have been passed on her but for her ready interference in a matter with which she had nothing " votsomdever" to do. In reply to the c har g e, the defendant said, ":Please your vorship, the point o' the thing's this here : Bet Marshall pitched into my wife for nuffen at all, and so help me tater, I never had a hangry word not with nobody. I arn't got no vitnesses here, my lord, except Jack, the pot-boy, and he can't get out to-day, so I hope as how you'll be able to let me have justice in his abstence." The costermonger was then fined 2s. 6d. and costs, which his better half directly drew forth from an old glove, and paid to the officer in attendance. HATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday Mr. Beamisb, the proprietor of the Half Moon T m a e N s ' ern .sr s L L A o i w s • e G r - r a o n a d d , Islington, B ENN E TT; b was s yßyers, ye tm r t s summoned d before informer, charged with having suffered billiards and cud-playing in his house. Thomas Cattle, the informer's witness, being sworn, stated that be resides at No. 9, Ann-street, Bethnal-green. On the 7th of January, about 7 o'clock in the evening he entered the defendant's house, and on going into the tap room he saw several persons playing at a game called " s hove-halfpenny" for a pot of beer. Charles Mumford, an ex-policeman, also a witness to Byers, corroborated this evidence. William Cave, another ex-policeman, being sworn, stated that he was in the employ of Byers. On Wednesday even ing, the 7th of January, he went into the house of the de fendant with the former witnesses, and on • entering the tap-room he saw several persons playing at a game called " shove-balfpenny." On leaving the place witness saw the " shade" of a billiard cue on the blind of the first floor window, on which he borrowed Cattle's great coat, and having disguised himself he followed a man who appeared to be a ge ntleman's servant up stairs, and on entering the room ho saw two persons playing at billiards, four others playing at cards , and a bagatelle table was also in the room. Witness took a seat, and the defendant came to him and said that it was a piece of impudence for him to enter a private room with out his permission, and ordered him to quit the place. The witness called for some gin and water, but the defendant refused to serve him, unless he went down stairs. Mr. nobler, solicitor for the defendant—Pray, have you not been a policeman ? Cave—Yes, I have. Mr. Hobler--And why were you turned out of it ? Cave—l resigned, because I did not like to put up with the insolence of inspectors and sergeants. Mr. Hobler—Now, on your oath, were you not dis missed ? Cave—No ; I say I resigned. I entered the force with a good character, and I left with one. Mr. Hobler—Pray, now, was not the Finsbury election being held on the night in question ? and was not the house of the defendant placarded with electioneering bills ? Cave —I did not see any. Mr. Hobler—Do you mean to swear, Sir, that on your entering the room you were not aware that it was used for the purposes of the election by Mr. Wakley's committee, and that Mr. Beamish told you that you had no right there, as it was private ? Cave—l swear that lie did not. Mr. Hobler inquired of Cattle and Mumford, whether they did not observe bills of Mr. Wakley's committee stuck up on his client's house ? They both swore positively that they did not. Mr. Hobler said, that he had respectable witnesses to refute the evidence of the informers' witnesses, and he called Mr. Gill, shoemaker, of Lower-street, Islington (one of Mr. Wakley's committee), who, being sworn, stated that the room was appropriated to the use of Mr. Wakley's committee during the election, &c. Mr. LAING—Were you in the room from 7 till 8 o'clock on the evening of the 7th of January ? Mr. Gill—Cer tainly I was, Sir. Mr. LAING—Did you see any body playing at cards there ? Mr. Gill—l did not, Sir. Mr. LAING—Was there any body playing at billiards ? Mr. Gill—l am satisfied there was not any body. Mr. LAING—Do you remember any person entering the room at the time stated ? Mr. Gill—l do ; and Mr. Bea mish came up and informed him that it was a private room appropriated for the use of Mr. Wakley's committee, and requested him to leave the apartment, and refused to serve him with any thing unless be went down stairs. Mr. Shillingford, one of Mr. Wakley's committee, being sworn, stated that he was in the room from 7 till 8 o'clock and afterwards on the above night, and he saw no card or billiard playing. Mr. LAING—Pray what are you ? Mr. Shillingfordi— An independent gentleman. Mr. LAING—DO you recollect a person entering the room ? Mr. Shillingford—l do, and he was told that it was a private committee-room, and requested to leave it, and he was eventually ordered out. Mr. LAING—How many persons were there present? Mr. Shillingford—From seven to ten of the committee. Mr. Hobler said he could produce other witnesses, but he would not t, aste their Worships' time. Mr. BENNETT said that the most gross perjury had been committed on one side or the other, and after measuring the credibility and respectability of each party, he must say that his opinion was in favour of the evidence for the de fendant, and the case ought to be dismissed. Mr. Shillingford assured the Bench that the perjury was not at their side. Mr. BENNETT said he was satisfied. The case was now dismissed without costs. Byers—But your Worships have not decided upon the evidence of " Shove-half-penny." Mr. BENNETT—We have decided, Sir, we'll hear no more. Several other publicans were prosecuted on similar charges, which were supported only by the evidence of Cattle, Cave, and Mumford, whose testimony was satis factorily impugned by a host of respectable witnesses, and the whole of the cases were dismissed, without costs, to the loss and discomfiture of Byers and his myrmidons, who quitted the office in a melancholy mood. THAMES OFFICE. Yesterday five young men, named Richard Elwood Thomas Kenny, Patrick Connor, John Jameson, and John Henessey, applied to the sitting Magistrate, Mr. BRODERIP, for his advice under the following very peculiar and afflict ing circumstances : Elwood, one of the applicants, and a very intelligent young man, stated, that he and his companions left Liver pool on the 26th of October last, on board the Henry Hull, bound to New York, he having previously paid 61. for his passage to a man named Cormick, a ship-broker and agent for emigrants, living at Liverpool. There were 123 passengers in all, many of whom were women and children. They had pretty fair weather until the beginning of No vember, when they had much foul weather, and in a gale of wind the vessel was dismasted. At this period they were within 300 miles of the American shore, but after they were dismasted they drifted above 900 miles, and, according to their reckoning, were approaching near to the South American coast, when they fell in with the Sarah, an American vessel, Captain Cornet, commander, who finding them in the most imminent danger, took them all out of the ship (which was left to drift on the ocean, or sink) into his own vessel, and behaved most humanely to them. Captain Cornet made sail for St. John's, New foundland, and in 24 days fell in with the General Hewitt, East Indiaman, a free trader, in which ship part of the emigrants, among whom were the applicants, were placed, the Sarah taking a portion to St. John's, and others to Liverpool, whence they had embarked. The applicants had landed at Blackwall on Thursday, without any articles of the least value, and without a farthing in their pockets. In answer to questions by the Magistrates, the applicants stated that they had lost all their little property which they embarked with at Liverpool, when they went in search of happier climes, and attributed the loss of the vessel to the drunkenness prevalent amongst the officers and crew. The captain and sailors were, in fact, constantly in a state of in toxication, and had it not been for the mate of the ship, who was a sober man, the crew and passengers would all have perished. The emigrants were obliged to perform the duties of the seamen, keeping watch, &c., and on one occasion the deck was left twenty-four hours without any person being on the watch. After they were taken on board the Sarah, they were exposed to the inclemency of the weather on the deck night and day, there being no room below, as the ship was almost filled with cotton.. The cap tain of the Sarah behaved in the kindest manner to them all, but he had not provisions for the supply of such an increased consumption, and during the twenty days the applicants were on board the Sarah, they suffered much from hunger and thirst, being allowed only half a biscuit per day and a gill of water. There was plenty of salt beef, but of this they could not eat, as it only increased their thirst. One poor woman begged for a draught of water, which, however, could not be spared, and she died shortly afterwards. Two other women and three children also died in the Sarah, in consequence of drinking salt water ; and three children perished on board the General Hewitt. The sufferings of all were most dreadful, and some became quite mad. The applicants here gave a most heart-rending account of the horrible condition of the un happy emigrants, in consequence of the want of food and water, and their exposure to the cold, which excited the sympathy of the magistrate and every person in the office. They had nothing but thanks to give to the Captains of the Sarah and of the General Hewitt who had behaved to them as kindly as the circumstances would allow ; but they could not help attributing the loss of the vessel anti their little all to the drunkenness and misconduct of the Captain and crew. Mr. BRODERIP said he regretted much the situation in which the applicants were placed, and his inability to re lieve them. If they would point out any way in which he could assist them, he should feel very happy to do all in his power. The applicants said they wished to get to Liverpool, where they had friends, but they had no means of pro curing a passage there, or even to procure a night's lodging. Mr. BRODERIP said that all he could do for them was to order some temporary relief for them from the office poor-box, which he would do. He trusted that the case would become known to the public through the medium of the newspapers, and he had but little doubt that the be nevolence of the public would afford them that assistance which the urgency of the case demanded. The unfortunate applicants were then presented with a shilling each, and withdrew, thanking the magistrate for his kindness. UNION-HALL. Yesterday the Rev. H. Jenkins, of Webber-street chapel, attended at this office for the purpose of making the following application : The applicant stated that some days ago a report ap peared in the newspapers , giving an account of a namesake of his who was brought before the Magistrates of that office on a charge of being intoxicated, and while in that state committing an assault on a policeman. In the course of the investigation it appeared that the defendant was in the habit of preaching in the open air, and this circum stance, as well as the name being the same, gave rise to a very general impression that he (applicant) was the person alluded to in the report. The Sunday following the day on which the account was published some imputations re flecting on the character of applicant were thrown out ; and on inquiry he ascertained that it was produced in con sequence of his having been mistaken for the Mr. Jenkins who had appeared at that office under circumstances so particularly degrading to a person who was in the habit of ' preaching the gospel. Before he had time to enter into an explanation on the subject, some of his (applicant's) hearers, at a lecture he gave in Bermondsey, very indis creetly called out, and insisted that he should not proceed, saying, " This is a very pretty fellow to come to listen to ; he get drunk, and assaulted a policeman for preventing him from knocking at Dick Curtis's door in the morning." In fact, he (applicant) had suffered very considerable an- noyance, and the object of his applications this install ce wa s to make a public statement on the sut:itet, so that it might obtain the publicity g iven to the other am unt ircnnt• Mr. MURRAY said lie had a perfect recolleetia n c of the Mr. Jenkins who was brought before him under th,,) Ott s tances detailed in the report , a nd he had no hesit tation saying that he did not bear the slightest, resemblant '0 t 9 ill' applicant. Applicant—The report deseribed the Mr. Jenkin who was brought before your Worship, and fined ss. for .b eing drunk, as being a grave-looking man, with his hair et m bed down over his forehead. Mr. MURRAY again repeated that the man allud ict I to was quite a different person from the applicant, and b of )ed, for the sake of the latter, that the misconception as t o his having appeared at that office in the character of a keen klant would be explained by the mode which he had at inpted for the purpose, and that it would satisfy the minds of !those who were doubtful on the point. The applicant having thanked the Magistrate, then. : with drew with the friends who accompanied him to the o ice. In the course of the day two persons presented them selves as bail for the appearance of GrobQker and I d oore, committed a few days ago from this office, charged . with conspiring to defraud. Mr. Grainge of property t o the amount of. nearly 6001. The Magistrate (Mr. TR A: ILL), however, rejected the bail of the parties, in consequent le of the unsatisfactory answers which they gave as tq their responsibility. NEW STREET FROI WAT BRIDGE. Yesterday a deputation from the parish of St. Paul, Ccvent garden, consisting of the rector, the Rev. G. Bowers, Messrs. Read and Walker, the Churchwardens, the Vestry Clerk, and several gentlemen belonging to the Paving Committee and Board of Guardians for the Poor, waited by appoint meat on Lord Granville Somerset, Chief Commissioner of IA roods and Forests, at the office in Whitehall-place, for the pi.trpo se of remonstrating with his Lordship on the de2ay which, had' taken place in opening the proposed line of street from the St rand, at Waterloo-bridge, through Charles-street, Bow-street. &e., and to state the inconvenience and loss to which that delay had given rise. Lord G. SOMERSET received the deputation in the most courteous manner, and, having requested them to bss seated, proceeded to say, that being aware of the object they bad in view, he had made the necessary inquiries, and having bail an Interview that morning with some of the parties cone, rued in the works, the result was, that the opening between ) Exeter street and York-street would he immediately undertakes 1, to the extent of 35 feet, and he had been assured that it w( tuld be completed by the 31st of the present month. The VESTRY CLERK said, that although the immedi 'late ob ject of the deputation wa s the o p enin g in question, yitt they had also to complain of the delay as regarded the inters sts of the householders and traders in the immediate n&ghbotar hood. He was quite sure that his Lordship would do the pas.* is ,h the justice to say, that they had not complained without cause. The Bill which authorized the undertaking had pans ed the House of Commons five years ago, and his Lordship wog uld be good enough to recollect, that public works of a much more extensive nature, such us the Great Western and the L ondon and Birmingham Railways, were engaged to be compls ted in little more than half the time already consumed in the p resent undertaking. The new street leading from the Mansio a--hous e to London-bridge would be completed in eighteen nam oths, al though the undertaking comprised several extensive buildings . Lord G. SOMERSET replied, that the delay complained of was not owing to any remsssness in the department ovi tr which he now presided, but might be attributed to the fact that the greater part of the property involved in the undertaking - did net belong to the Crown, but to private individvals, who of c ourse had their own interests to look to. He was quite away e that the Woods and Forests might have exercised the legal power they possessed of compelling the owners of property in I he line 3 of street marked out to come at once to terms, but that Was power which they did not wish to exercise unless in, an ex treme case. Mr. YOUNG, of the firm of Black and Young, book sellers, said, that his house immediately adjoined the proposeci open" ing, and he could bear testimony.to the fact, that from :the lay passable state of the street in that direction, a dead r obber, had been sustained by all the retail shopkeepers in the neigh; bourhood. He hoped th at the o p ening, when effected, wouh i be made passable for foot passengers, otherwise the evil wouw not be abated. Lord G. SOMERSET replied, that as soon as the openings made, a pavement would be laid down. poor families in Exeter' Mr. CALLAGHAN, the collector of the parish rates, n ssure a his Lordship, that no less t:_lan 700 street alone were driven from 1:2,e street since the houses there were pulled down, to make way fo: ments. The whole retail business ot'. the street had been coal; what were called been pletely destroyed, and the inhabitants ha,.! now nothing in b but Exeter-hall, a new theatre, and a new t2 lture . h• Mr. WALKER, one of the overseers, was the attention of his Lordship to the upper part at e which be would say was in a most disgusting Bow-stre de,trous of ca et, state. It was a very great thoroughfare for carriages pl as3l 4-b , to and from the theatres, ana unless an opening were epees',, effected, by removing the corner house, lately in the occur; tion of Mr. Houlditch, the coach-builder, he should net wonder if some serious accidents took place. At precept tb a a i part of the street was a receptacle for dirt and filth of e l - description. ce Lord G. SOMERSET said that he was not prepared to og and ;:langerc.)o; any explanation himself with regard to Bow-street, but 1 '; would send for Mr. Milne, the principal sur ve y or, and I/ doubt he would afford the necessary information. Mr. MILNE, on being sent for, said that some diffien iti had arisen in the removal of Mr. Houlditch's house in eel; quence of a defect in the title , but he bel i e ved the diffetthe would be very soon removed, and then the house w ould d taken down, and a sufficient opening effected. He adm tt :o that an unnecessary delay had taken place, and that the 1 130 of street ought to have been complet ed lon g since, but .0% delay was occasioned principally by private individuals hol t e, property under the Mir .uis of Exeter and others. He ad' o f that there would be no delay in completing the pavement Bow-street as soon as the oin should be made. A sp The V ESTRY -CLERK was pen desirous g of asking his L or a whether it was intended to complete the line of street e"" Hanover-street to Holborn ? Lord G. SOMERSET replied, that situated as he was, 1 33 %0 so lately entered on the duties of the department, it c e i t o hardly be expected that he could give any explanation oa point. The deputation must be aware that the street e°3oi not be carried on unless a econsiderable expense, pari ica ' as the line embraced very little Crown property. The deputation were then about to retire, when .„ His LORDSHIP hoped that they felt he had afforded much information connected with the subject as be Ice taking into consideration the fact that he wu s but new In tl 3l The deputation then retired, thanking his Lordship 1°- polite manner in which he had received them. AMOUR-PROPRE OF THE FRENCH.—Th e ; 11 ; caricatures of meagre, starveling Frenchmen are, ait e es . fa' not without truth. It is impossible to mistake their facneiri English ; there is a thin, unsubstantial, soup-and-salad a . ,Prvee, ance about them which contrasts strikingly with the roar; g robustiousness of the sturdy insulaires. Any one 'oPrife, seen a French regiment under arms must have been surPoltrA too, at the diminutive stature of the soldiery ; they a r „ e boys in height. The newspapers recently fernished og oA f an account of a decently tall recruit being sent home re v for a soldier on account of his height. Some ingeni ° c o 0; son was invented for this • but the true cause was, hieit/00 rades could not bear to be reminded of their dimintil'% o 0 , 0 by comparison with him. If you ask a French officer. endeavour to persuade you that short men are se lecte l l b choice, because they move quicker, and everything 'f l o e, French soldiery depends on celerity of movement- -- P' l4 taut is a Frenchman to allow his inferiority in any tbiog t ; a rte q poleon's victories have cost the male population thiee - % is of an inch of their altitude. The English are an 111 , c he i,$1;i1 than the French, but the Yankees are taller still, for h ' on an average, nearly an inch taller than the Engli s ; D y ci t ; politeness of the Parisians is less the expression of be l,of amiability of feeling, than a consciousness that it ro e them not to lose sight of the fact that Paris est (9 bon gout.—New Monthly. B IR THS. of C" On the 14th inst., at Zofingen, Switzerland, the lady - G. J. Hope Johnstone, R.N., of a daughter, On the 19th inst.., at Lake House, Wanstead, the l ady ° Hood, Esq., of a son. On the 21st inst., the wife of Mr. Thomas Rooke , of 01 Wandsworth, Surrey, of a daughter. On the 20th inst., at Southampton, the lady of Ge ar° Pocoeke, Esq., of a daughter. MARRIED. •0 1 4 On the 18th inst., at Littleton, Miss Dorothy lAr°e d ' v l as f i iji or daughter of Thomas Wood, Esq., to Major George Gus t ' : , of of the 1 3 :.: d sq. o , r o K f s in o g n ' ti s a o , l \ s v m est L m ig e h a t th. Dragoons, second s e 01" efts cif °° On the 20th inst., at St. Clement's, Ipswich, Edw„s l _,.. f iet late Charles Hanburv, Esq., of Halstead, Essex, to kla. - e ti• daughter of John Co . bbold, jun., Esq., of the Cliff, IP s Lod' On the 20th inst., at St. Pancras New Church , J°'l,l,r, P of Fenchurch-street, to Caroline, widow of the late 1 1 . Esq. focs ° ' On the 21st inst., Solomon, fourth son of Daniel IN ao rt, , of Brixton-hill, to Anne, eldest daughter of Abraham , f of South-st rest, Finsburv-square. J NST. On the 20th inst., at Seaford, Sussex, Captain c Hon. Company's Bengal Infantry, to Sarah J ane, se ° of o- te r H of . Harrison, Esq.o l On the 22d inst., at St. Pancras New Church, V en t 40 Stainbank, Esq., of Peckham, to Mary, younge'sqore. William Essex, q, of Woburn-place, Tavistock- W ln 8 Lon& Richards Rivingtol and c o. ; Harvey L ' 13,1 Lep; Elder, an R. Mack York ; S 1100 In 6t no,: London and NV. Son ; R . Eookei Te gg ; Si. 116 ; T. a J• Bain ; Oxford York : G Edinburg] This day GEc az r i, Fresnoy, a Lave taken added, a T be places G °graph3 London 3 ° 11 ; W RR TI( ""e se With J .lAnd - on: nateha r d a Rivingt Whittaker C° . ; Darts and C o . Capes Wilkie;H ~B ° l l ; J. E .m 1 npare N EM Fl Nita, free Vow s o f ge To whi c h tvr Worth Nationa ........... fia.. ...L.id;rl. '°• Hamilton G - 3" je and ( narris kns ; lid York : Wils No THE 11 aSi the Attain= and in COMT on and You A SHOR 12 mv. new LOGIC London • J'AL Richa Booker CO. ;Whitt: Route r ; Hol Vul J. w• k yd ri vse L e A co V n, Torun de Dialectic Testimoi rallverbia Gi 4 tie nova, ll L :nd cti on n ra b l u eT : ; find Co• j R m .._ • ; CO -14 '" ; j' , Of "CHiEc Y J A. OHN P Pu • Inter ues u • 'O3 Metric In ondon: L Nv Richardso Sh ams; J Haa bn Nod a n d ll' c - i n g and 6 Y rs. , ; and Br* Dolphin Cornelius Ner sh ELEG ar Te's Editi TROM MINE, L ov AIINoR :11 2 vc IS CIA IS, 2 8 PI PC44I:OkZCZNEDSI y r -.,./,‘R of NI suNG O S Oct z` Iltp'S'S P( L ECTIO "(IR KS 2 vi *** The OUD( k o . , h ., corral la,lrden tiYum th i : l e for new s 4 es'a With ti ti o „ ,or N o , Olitori t t t 4 e ta.bles . L" ; der t idy Tre, mi„..'ese notice of t ,ott of the I th e ir Council r 'sPective 1 44 at io n . T 1 wittottateed Pla tieqt. 411 the iro i standini N Th e AT AI AGA so, i ,fib ers, at 2 s ter," a CH 2, A 11):1 o ers, at 2s, The Jan 't le as. Uary ford Lott :T s ltdiwh E thii ß e i V ter_ii it,,, 'ors to all 1 klrs of Life L,:abus inter pr, olli t ', 'lf t o y a nd ner lid th ; th e eons this w ss e, i d to th e N. orit a eonf Ilasejell wher 4 11 f e ,? 4 nnials : t hef ti i - _tne tnol I 1 N . ( Le si ii t of 1, 41 . (1 re ' We a gr kre it . b u e r n a rn w era 0 1 ' 14 n 1 : it ftesting " DIED. 1 579 . vl° I '4a', off, E On the 21st inst., William I3agge, Esq.,_ ag e ' li, I tt ' • , offers years one of the Aldermen of King's Lynn, Norfolkr•,;ct 01, tile f 1 4,:, ttsal e ' On the 17th inst., at Tunbridge Wells, Jane, ,aelia,i '''- d 1 4 1 11 m in cot Holcombe, Esq., formerly of the Island of St- n ' 00 1 , v e ila.4. _ e oniti Colonial Treasurer of New South Wales. 0 1 5 Ppii,. 4 d the %, Ay, enri On the 20th inst., in his '3lst year, Thomas g enrY ' 6 ; i t' h i l ' h al. ' ". ' Mr. Leigh, late of Dulverton, Somerset, solicitor. oftb . a bove m in On the 17th of November, Mr. Henry Wlilvlihartes%-w.._,,,,5i11i3°E:04, r,,,,;rt,re:rr:,,:l7:tsura Navy, aged 20, second son of the late Chadds of Duckworth, Jamaica. d co' 2 1 as t , - ngate, d li n i ' l 4 s ' Gos. On the 21st inst., Mr. William North, City.roa ~ i, a tien, , !,, terrace. 044 . , ,,.. Y, On IT Pt DO ° for ad, London : Printed and Published by AIL , -- d. 1% ;he Won] at The Sun Office, IC°. 112, Stran , 1, Ciftt rei , pa( i • • • _*';'-' 1 3ald w