The Sun. — London, England, 1835-11-05 00:00:00

discovered the error-iii the .printed statement of Con servative objections sustained, which wee made to be 104, while the Times stated them at 59 only, the Standard' would have found that both of us were in error. With respect to any-calculations of the Morn tug Chronicle, as to the election returns.of. 1834-5, we cannot see the relevancy of that subject to the ques tion of party gains in the last Registration. We always foretold, and truly, the certain downfall of Sir Robert Peel from any Reformed Parliament. The Standard predicted the contrary, and prophesied the stability of his crazy structure of .Ultra Toryism and mock Li beralism. The artful Premier had his " fair trial," and was condemned. The greater the gain claimed by the Standard for the Tories at the last general elec tion, the lower the fall of Toryism and the more hope less its recovery. The Standard constantly comments on the small Ministerial majority in the Commons, and selects the Irish Church question as the test. We deny the test. The appropriation principle is only one question. On what other important ques tion has Sir Robert Peel counted a formidable mi 'nority ? What was the number of his Tory fol lowers in his divisions on the Corporation Bill? ',What will be his minority on Irish Corporation Re - - 'fain, and on the Dissenters' Bills of next Session ? 'What was the puling cry of the Standard on Monday night, but the admission of the hopelessness of Con servative supremacy, and the expediency of a Coali 7 tion ? What was its sage counsel to the Tories on Saturday last, but " not to run their heads against a 'wall in the coming municipal elections ?" How will the. Tories relish Municipal Reform next Christmas, when the self-elected corps of Corporators will be dis :banded—when the Noble Recorders will be dispensed with—when an elective system of municipal govern ment will be e stablished; affecting the seats of 265 MeMbers of Parliament in,England and Wales ?. Will 'that be no gain to' be Reformers, no loss to 'the Tories ? Will their pet:nide& favourable. Registra tion counterbalance :Corporatfori Reform ? Will ,the coming Town COuncils '.allow the ,Tories to bribe, treat, and otherwise corrupt with impunity ? We think not ; and whenever a Dissolution or Parliament shall be deemed expedient—whether advised qty, the present Ministry, adventured 'by the Tories, or risked by Tory minions.of the Court—we confidently put our trust in Corporation Reform, and the present Regis , . iration.—Morning Chronicle. • This day being the anniversary of the attempt made • • 'by aPopish party to destroy Protestant ascendancy in England, it may not be mal apropos to remark that, notwithstanding the lapse of more than two centuries, Popery still assumes the same restless character and desire for supremacy. The engines used at the pre sent day for depriving Protestants of the advantages derived from the Reformation are well understood. Persons who have watched with anxiety the progress of agitation, which has been working in England and Scotland during some months past, are satisfied that the object of the agitators is frustrated. Happily for the Protestant people of these realms there never was a period when the public mind was less disposed to turbulence. The shafts of falsehood and sedition have fallen harmless, and the agitators, who calculated upon the worst feelings of human nature, may now retire with the assurance that their plan for the subversion of the Protestant Government will fail. The people have seen through the Romish ma noeuvres, and have rejected them with silent scorn. It was a wild scheme which led the Popish Head and Tail to imagine for a moment that the Protestants of England, Scotland, and Ireland would abandon their religion, and destroy the frame of a Constitution which has worked better than any other upon earth, to coun tenance the dominion of the Church of Rome and the vilest democratic tyranny. The Roman Catholic party in Ireland are deceived. They have no chance of over turning that pure Christianity that-Alisdains the false worship of the Church from which Protestants dissent They commenced their attack by political excite ment, conceiving that the destruction of the great institutions of Protestant Government would crush in their fall those barriers which have hitherto kept the Papists from making serious inroads upon reli gious freedom. Upon the ruins of the Protestant Church they would re-establish the power, oppres sion, and supremacy of the Pope. Common expe rience might have told them the project is illusory ; but they cakulated upon the lukewarm feelings of many ungrateful members of the Reformed Church, and a class of factious Destructives, without religion, who, in the perpetration of mischief, would igno rantly destroy the fonndation of their own safety. They, perhaps, imagined . that the people of England and Scotland were influenced by the same spirit as the unfortunate Priest ridden classes in Ireland, but they were egregiously wrong. The Protestants of the British empire may be dissatisfied with the law as it stands with respect to tithes, and with some dispro portion in the payment of the Clergy, but in general they would rather die than submit to the change Ro man Catholics would introduce. In Ireland the Catholic populaticn has been long discontented, and • opposed to Protestant rule. The Pope is consi dered above every earthly power, consequently the allegiance due to a Protestant monarch is superseded. From the reign of ,Elizabeth to the present time, they have been discontented subjects. The mild Govern ment of James the Firotsould not prevent a project for the re-establishment of-popery, which, were it not a fact known to all the world,' could scarcely be cre dited by posterity. " This was the gunpowder plot, than which," says the historian, " a more terrible scheme never entered into the human heart to conceive, and which shows at once the most determined courage may be united with the most execrable intentions." If the plot of the sth of November, 1605, had suc ceeded, England," in the words of Lord Coke, would have .been left without a King or Parliament." If the designs of the Papists of the sth of Novem= her, 1835, were to succeed, the United Kingdom would be under the sway of Daniel O'Connell, and a Roman Catholic Legislature.—Morning Post. The more favourable view which the Government of .Louis Phillippe takes of the politics and position of the Madrid Xinistry than it did some time ago, may be accounterfof by what our Parisian Correspondent stated yesterday of the " juggle" which is now going on to deceive the Spanish people, and gratify the despot of the Tuileries, and which we here repeat in his own words, that the public who have pecuniary in ' terests at stake . may be on their guard. Our Cor respondent says, " The return of the Spanish Govern ment to the juste milieu system has become so obscry - able to the Ultra-Liberals of France; that it may be warranted it will not be long overlooked by those of Spain, so that, unless skilfully managed, the redoubt able provincial Juntas may be expected once more to spring to life and bring about another crisis." Now,' we say, whether it be skilfully managed or not, an attempt by the new Ministry to govern Spain accord ing to the wretched, no-principle, juste Milieu system of the knavish Doctrinaires, will eventually result in a worse state of political discord and confusion than that which, by deceitful promises of an honest and liberal Government, has been superficially tranquilised for the thornent. The friendship of the treacherous Louis Phillippe can only be gained by falsifying the pro mises of good government made to the Spanish people, and bringing ruin upon the heads of those who sacri fice'the interests of Spain to him who has destroyed the liberties of France. —Morning Herald. Among the hacknied objections which are made frOrn day to day against inquiries into, and exposures of, the conduq of . Irish Roman Catholic clergy, is oneWhi , .ch must be briefly noticed. The duty which has. of late been cast upon us in the production of evidenee as to the acts' of that body of persons, has more than once been called "an attack upon the ROmishTreligion." According to our 'understanding orthe word religion, it is an unfounded charge. A lnan's religion is the sense he entertains of his relation to the Almighty. With that sentiment or opinion in the roind of a Roman Catholic, need we disavow, for xlie 'hundredth time, all right or pretension to meddle on tic' part of any human authority, so far as it is a mere Opinion confined . Within his own breast ? But the Consequences flowing fiClms that opinion, and . the . impulses and actions originating in it, spay be of such . practical mischief to society, that on the score of Self- ;preservation they ought to be interfered' with, their progress checked, and their instruments diaarined, if *sible, of the further power to injure. 3n coinpanns TE-114] SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 1855.. ROLLS'. COURT-WEDNESDAY. that of the 1,20,000/., and in respect of that she was advised by her Counsel not to enter into any evidence, but to file a hill either to have the benefit of the agreement, together with the - parole declaration, or to have it set aside, as ob• tamed by fraud and misrepresentation. In this state of things the Master made his report, by which he found the only outstanding estate to be 20,0001. advanced and lent in April, 1826, by the intestate to Mr. Mortimer through the house of Bazett and Co., being the 20,0001. in question, and the 18,0001. part of the purchase money of Foothill Abbey. To that report the plaintiffs, together with Mr. Frazer, have taken exceptions in, respect of the sums dis allowed—and these exceptions are now pending for argu ment at the Rolls. The question upon them will wholl) , turn upon the weight of evidence. Should they be over ruled, Mrs. Mortimer has no desire to dispute the allowance of the 20,0001. But as it was expressly sworn that the Master allowed that sum merely on the admission signed by Mr. Mortimer, and as that admission was made only on the faith of there being no .other claim advanced, she was desirous, should the plaintiff and Mr. Frazer at all succeed on their exceptions, to have that admissio❑ set aside. The Learned Counsel then detailed and commented on all the affidavits on both sides, which were, in some respects, very contradictory. Mrs. Mortimer was not now asking the Court to decide on the question raised in the pe tition, although she, for her part, was willing, on the evi dence adduced, to leave it to the Court to decide. All she asked was investigation ; that in the form the Court should think most desirable, either by an issue or else a special re ference to the Master, or by the Bill, for leave to file which the petition was presented. Mr. KINCIERSLEY, for Mr. Aitkin, the husband of one of the next of kin,' said his petition was peculiar. He was resident in Scotland, and stood aloof from the animosity unfortunately exhibited in this case. He was one of the persons who was an ear-witness to the arrangement, and his conviction was clear and firm that Mrs. Mortimer's Counsel had justly represented its tenor, If Mr. Aitkin was perjuring himself, he was . doing so not only gratui tously, but against all the motives ordinarily considered to affect credibility. The true conflict was between 14 tes timony and that of some of the other persons whose affida vits were produced. The whole contest was as to the right to. administer— , , , Mr. TunNELappeared for Mrs.,Aitkin and , her , children who loft themselves in the hands of the. Court - - • Mr. JACOB, who opposed the petition, inquireit what amount of intetpst Mrt Aitkin had in the fund,?''. 4Mr..,KiNDEasLEY said Mr. Aitkin.appeared•by separate Counsel, because involved as his credibility was in the case against the interest of his wife and children, he was re solved to let their interests be protected by their own Coun sel. Mrs. Aitkin's share of the property was in fact a se curity for a fund which was settled, so that Mr. Aitkin had a direct interest in the-estate. ' Mr. WALKER, for Mr. Lumsden and his family, said although from his situation he could not consent to any thing, his clients did not object to the prayer of the petition. They were desirous the contest should be settled amicably ; but if that was impossible they conceived Mrs. Mortimer ought to be allowed an opportunity to substantiate her case in a regular manner to entitle her to relief. Mr. JACOB (followed on the same side by Mr. DANIEL) appeared in opposition to the petition on the part of the defendants, Mr. Frazer, Mr. James Mortimer, and Sir W. and Lady Cole. If the bill could be filed without the leave of the Court the petition was uncalled for, and if that could not be done, then the petitionei ought to produce some authority to show that leave should be given in such a late stage of the proceedings, after she had been so long in possession of the facts in respect to which she now claimed relief. No such authority had been shown, and therefore he had a right to demur to the prayer of the petition. The Learned Gentleman then entered into the case of the de fendants at considerable length, after which Mr. WIGRAM rose to address the Court for Mr. and Mrs. Trezevant ; but as the hour for rising had nearly ar rived the case was adjourned again until to-morrow morning. Protestantism and Popery together, the difference in what concerns abstract faith is incomparably less than that between the two systems of church government, each being considered with regard to the operation of its ecclesiastical members upon the laity, and the pre rogatives assumed and exercised by the ministers over their respective • congregations. The Protestant clergyman, beyond his right of property in tithe—se cured to him by law, and,, defined and :strictly re strained by law—has no particle of control or domi nion over the poorest of his flock. What the power of the Romish clergy is—how vicious in its nature— how frightful in its degree—how capricious—how despotic—how immoral—how irrational—how peri lous to every rival influence—how contemptuous of every lawful or magisterial function—at once how subtle and how violent in its motions, we find written in every page which develops the political history of Ire land, not merely during the short periods referred to in the proceedings of the Committee to which we have so repeatedly adverted, and which still supplies mate rials untouched, we might say inexhaustible, whereon to employ the meditation of the most discerning states man ; but throughout the whole course of those fifty or sixty years that have elapsed•since the relaxation-of the penal laws respecting property, first revived the sleeping ambition of the priesthood, and enabled the torpid serpent once more to sting. It might have been more discreet for the Papists to conceal from us that their Church is ever least noxious when loaded with the heaviest fetters. How Irish Popery, when ram pant, behaves herself, our immediate fathers could only learn from books ; whereas we, unfortunately, have an all-sufficient instructor—our daily observation. The priesthood of Ireland sets at defiance every law which has its • source in any constituted authority of the realm, or aims at the accomplishment of any one pur pose, but the supremacy of the Popish Church. It leagues itself at preseilt with,the fierce .passions. otan idle,!p.oor,and untaught; soic-in,so far as they•arenn ill-taught, multitude, pressed upon by mUltifarious wantsystimulated , by vague, wild, and' chimerical 'ex pectations, with consciences callcids' to' the 'ordinary Sens'e of guilt, bObause ibtolved by'the• Priest Nin i all fear of moral retribution. When excuses are made for the errors of the lower Irish, that they are at least a grateful people, won by beneficence to serve and love their protectors, let us admit the justift of the apology, and then judge how the charge against the priest is aggravated by the pitch to which he perverts the grateful nature of this his kindly and good-natured flock to acts the most heartless and revolting. At Clonmel there was a Quaker who paid away in wages of labour not less than, 3001. per week, and yet at the last election, because he voted for Mr. Bagwell, a Con servative gentleman, who likewise spent a large fortune in the neighbourhood, he was pelted and covered with mud, hardly escaping from the street to his own house in safety, being sacrificed to the denuncia tions of the brutal autocrat who bore the name of priest. Another of these religious teachers encouraged his parishioners from the altar, to hoot, and pursue, and pelt with " mud and gravel," alt who should presume to vote against hi; injunctions, inasmuch as " the law could not lay bold of them" for such gentle violeace. A third of these, worthy Ministers of the Gospel hurled hiS curse against all• voters for the " bloody tyrants" who had committed the massacre of Gortroe, using such language in the presence •of the King's troops, who went to hear mass, not to learn dis affection, that the officer, Lieutenant Brown of the 29th Regiment, was forced to withdraw with his men from the chapel, amidst the coarse jests and insults of the reverend rebel. So we find, that instead of the Bishops _interposing, as might have been expected from their station, a rightful or salutary influence, to discourage such turbulent and daring practices, Dr. Nolan, the Carlow Bishop, addressed to his priests a letter, humorously termed pastoral ! wherein he scoffed at the notion of their remaining tranquil or silent ob servers of what was going on, " identified as they were with the people," while it is attested by a dozen wit nesses that the people were well enough disposed to be at peace, if their ghostly counsellors would let them. And yet these bishops—these pious and honourable men—had, shortly after " emancipation" was carried, written circular declarations to an nounce that they would never again authorize a cha pel to be opened or used for political purposes ; that the Duke of Wellington, who gave them emancipation, (the "stunted corporal" of these latter days), was the " greatest of living men," and " entitled to the grati tude of all Roman Catholics for ever !" Wretched, vulgar-minded, shallow, unprincipled quacks, ye may •be priests, but ye are neither Christians nor men of honour. There- yet remains another appurtenance to the absolute power of these lowly apostles—viz., the power of taxation. This power, as they exercise it, is .more than Royal. They frame the scale of each im post at their leisure, and read out from the altar the name of every fanner, specifying how much he is to pay—such an one 2d.. per acre, such another 3d., a third 4d., and so on ; and woe be to him who hesitates about paying this arbitrary, unequal, often vindictive, and forced contribution, -of -which all complain bitteily, but eat the leek invariably, for it is an election fund, and laid on, levied, exacted (whether honestly employed or not is another question) by " his reverence"—the most absolute, selfish, coarse, and hateful tyrant that ever oppressed the earth. Yet, such is the confusion which besets men's minds, that the • cause of these atrocious hypocrites is styled by a crowd of fools the . cause of liberty, and the supremacy, spiritual and temporal, at which they drive, is nicknamed the rights of the people I We repeat it—England must interpose. Our Protestant Church, ,and our Protes tant brethren, must 'not be sacrificed for the despicable object of accommodating some dozen or two of dn a Whigs with a twelvemonth's lodging in Downing-street and Whitehall at the public expense. We have not room to-day for the passages of the evi dence to which we have here referred. We shall con tinue the extracts to-morrow.-7'imes.. INSOLVEItT COURT-WEDNESDAY James Sutherland Menzies, late of Magdalen College, Cambridge, was opposed by Mr. Packwood, a solicitor of Cheltenham, in person. It appeared from the evidence of Mr. Packwood, that be became acquainted with the insolvent some time back at Cheltenham, at which place his sister resided as a governess. She was now dead. In 1833 the insolvent again visited Cheltenham, and stated that he was about to proceed up the Rhine. Mr. Packwood recommended him to a boarding house at Cheltenham, and became answerable for his bill there to the amount of 40/. Mr. Packwood had to pay this 401. The in4,olvent had made statements to him that he bad certain expectancies contingent on a Mrs. Jess" Stewart dying before sho came to the age of 25. Mrs. Packwood had been much taken by his address and man ners, and became his bail in two actions, in both of which he had been fixed with the debts and costs. He had un dirotood Mrs. Jesse Stewart to be dead, but be had since heard she .was living. He now • claimed as a creditor for 1.501. Mr. Packwood stated that he was not actuated by any vindictive feeling towards the insolvent, but he con sidered it right tha the public should be made acquainted with his conduct. Mr. Commissioner HARRIS, after stating that the kind ness of Mr. Packwood had no doubt been ill-requited by the insolvent, and regretting that it was lamentable to see a person educated as he had been in his present situation, said that no actual fraud had been proved against the insolvent in the representations he had made, and that be was, antler the circumstances, entitled to his discharge. He was accordingly discharged. MR. GLETG'S " CHRONICLES OF WALTHANI." —" This new work, by the celebrated author of The Subaltern,' is a striking and original book. It contains a great deal which could only be written by a writer who possesses the faculty, by the simple and manly vigour of his narrative, to communicate to the minds of his readers the same powerful impressions that were made upon hig awn, Deservedly popular as the Country Curate' has been. Mr. Gleig has, in this new work, taken higher and more interesting ground."—Literary Gazette, LEGIIORI4, OCT. 21.—For this week past then: has been c.. 9 new case of cholera here or in any other part of Tuscany. Wp may, therefore, hope that we are now kieliv ered from this clreackfuj yiaitation. LIVERPooL COTTON-NATqcp', ;1.0 0 YEM73 0 Thei business to-day. has beep 2,000 bags, cbies3 , Arnerican . , sold at 7d. to 10i d. ; 30 Egyptian at 11 - id., and 59:Varan ham at ls. • Some sales •of low 'quality have been made, and there is more inquiry for these sorts than of late. Thu market has not yet regained the confidence. we are accus= tomed to. WILSON V. TODD. This - wasTa demurrer put in to a supplementary bill. A testator of the name of Wilson, by his will, appointed three persons of the name of Tinkler, Todd, and Hadleigh, his trustees and executors. His creditors filed a bill for the administration of the estate, and, pending the proceedings, Tinkler, the acting execuf or, died. The cause came to a hearing, and in the absence of Tinkler's proper reprnenta tive a decree was made, which ordered the Master in pur suing certain inquiries which were then directed, not to disturb the accounts of the deceased trustee, and to credit the surviving trustees with a sum of 7001., which they had paid to Tinkler in his.lifetime. One of the parties to the original bill having since become bankrupt, his assignees had filed the present supplemental bill, wl.ich brought Tinkler's representative before the Court, and prayed that an account might be taken of Tinkler's estate in aid of certain new in quiries. To so much of the bill as sought to disturb 'Fink ler's accounts the present demurrer was filed. In support of the demurrer it was contended that the present bill was defective, inasmuch as it contained no facts which had not been before the Court at the time the original decree was pronounced. The Court had finally settled the question of Tinkler's accounts, and consequently the plaintiffs had now • no right to seek to have them re-opened. His Honour, the MASTER of the ROLLS, said that he did not feel any doubt about the case, although the record, as it at present stood, was certainly very singular. He should allow the demurrer. VICE CHANCERY-WEDNESDAY• TREVIZANT V. FRAZER. The Counsel in support of the petition in this cause, and such Counsel as appeared for prirties who did not op pose it, were heard yesterday till the rising of the Court, and the hearing of the Counsel in opposition was reserved 'for to-day. The prayer of the petition was, that the petitioner, Mrs. Mortimer, might be at liberty to file a bill, for the purpose of establishing a certain written agreement with a parole addition to it, or for - establishing that the, estate of her de ceased_ husband, George Mortinier, •of . whom she was exe cutrik; was-not liable lo,pat'd sum of 20,0061. to the estate of 4-he 'late Mr. Farquhar ;"and that a Certain declaration of her husband, admitting the'deht, 'might not be used as evidence against his estate. The, bill: in this case was for the administration of the estate of the late Mr. Farquhar, of Fonthill Abbey, who, it will be recollected, died intes tate in 1826, leaving a personal estate exceeding 700,000/. On his death, several next of kin, his nephews and nieces, appeared. Of these, Mr. George Mortimer,' the peti tioner's late husband, who lived in Basinghall-street, was the only one on terms of intimacy and friendship with Mr. Farquhar ; and it appeared that Mr. Farqhuar had at va rious times, from 1821, given him considerable sums of money, but particularly in April, ,1826, George Mortimer received from that gentleman an order on the house of Ba zett and Co. for 20,000/., which was immediately paid by a check on their bankers. About that time, Mrs. Morti mer now stated in her affidavit that she had had conversa tions with her husband, who was in delicate health, on the subject of his pecuniary dealings with Mr. Farquhar, and that she expressed to him her uneasiness lest, if Mr. Farquhar should die without a will, there might be a dis pute between her husband and the other next of kin, whe ther the advances of money Mr. Mortimer had received were loans or gifts. She, therefore, urged him to apply to Mr. Farquhar on the subject. He did so, and the re sult was that Mr. Farquhar wrote and sent him the follow ing letter : " Church-street, April 30, 1826. " DEAR GEORGE,—To relieve your anxiety concerning monies, I tell you that all sums of money you have ever re ceived from me are gifts, and not loans. This, I think, ought to satisfy your lady, and convince her I am doing a great deal for the benefit of your family, as I have always told her.-1 remain, yours truly, 4 , JAMES FARQUHAR." The July following, Mr. Farquhar died intestate, and Mr. Farquhar Frazer, a Barrister, one of the next of kin, commenced a very active inquiry touching his Estate, and ascertained the amount of his advances to Mr. George Mor timer. It was stated in Mrs. Mortimer's affidavit that her husband was at that tirnein a very precarious state of health, having suffered from a paralytic stroke ; and she also stated that Mr. Frazer used continually to call at his house in Basinghall-street, and harass him on the subject of the ad vance of monies, urging him to admit they had been loans and not gifts. And in the course of these conversations she said Mr. Frazer used to threaten her husband he should never get a conveyance of Fonthill Abbey, which he had, purchased from Mr. Farquhar for 19,7001., of which 18,0001. was due at Mr. Farquhar's death. However, these means did not succeed in obtaining the desired acknowledg ment from Mr. Mortimer. Meantime a caveat had been entered by others of the next of kin against the grant of letters of administration, and some negotiations on the subject of the administration, in which Mr. Frazer was particularly active, took place, and it was stated that Mr. Frazer, without the consent of Mr. Mortimer, desired his proctor to prepare a draft declaration that 20,0001. had been 'advanced by the intestate to Mr. Mortimer, who con tended that it was a gif', but that the next of kin contended that it was a loan. Mr. Frazer had then several communi cations with Mr. Mortimer, in which he proposed that him self and Mr. Mortimer, and his brother Mr. James Mor timer, should take out administration, with the consent of the other next of kin, if Mr. Mortimer would admit the loan of the 20,000/. ; and at the same time he alle g ed as a fact, that Mr. Farophar had told his partner, Mr. Colvin, the 20,000/. was merely a loan, and he induced some others of the next of kin to call on Mr. Mortimer, and inform him they would not withdraw the caveat and assent to his joint appointment with Mr. Frazer and his brother, unless upon the terms of his recognising the loan. It was also expressly sworn that Mr. Frazer told Mrs. Mortimer, in the presence of Mr, James Mortimer and Mr. Aitkin, the husband of another of the next of kin, that if he would consent to repay the 20,000/. no demand would ever be made upon him by any of the next of kin in respect of any other sums he had received. Mr. Mortimer, being in very indifferent health, and anxious to save his family from litigation, at length consented to these terms ; and in December, 1826, Mr. Frazer called on Mr. Mortimer, and induced him to accompany him to the office of Mr. Gale, a solicitor, in Basinghall-street, who lived opposite his house,. but who had never been employed by Mr. Mortimer. Mr. Frazer then instructed that gentleman to prepare the agreement. The agreement as prepared by Mr. Gale stated the con tention, whether the 20;0001. was a loan or a gift ; and that, to prevent any dispute, Mr. Mortimer consented to treat it as a loan, provided the next of kin would give him time for the payment of it by instalments, and the next of kin engaged to complete the title to Fonthill. But this arrangement was not to prejudice Mr. Mortimer's right as one of the next of kin. This instrument was read to Mr. Mortimer, who objected that it did not contain any under taking that no other claim should be made. Whereupon it was sworn that Mr. Frazer, in the presence of Mr. James Mortimer, and of Mr.. Lumsden and Mr. Aitkin, the husbands of two of the next of kin, stated that was en tirely unnecessary, inasmuch as it was fully agreed if Mr. Mortimer would sign such a paper no further claim should be made, and that administration should be granted to the three in the manner already mentioned. Accordingly, upon this representation, the agreement was signed by all the parties. "Mr. Frazer immediately afterwards called on the proctor, and desired him to change the draft declaration of goods, and to enter it in the 20,000/. as a debt due from Mr. Mortimer ; and he' induced Mr. 'Mortimer to depose to its truth under the impression that • it. was necessary for obtaining the joint letters of .admi nistration, Shortly afterwards there appeared . to be some difficulty in procuring the necessary security fur Mr: James Mortimer : and Mr. Mortimer was in duced to forego joining in the administration by some arrangement with Mr. Frazer and Mr. James Mor timer, both of whom renounced sonic claim relative to Fonthill, which they made as heirs-at-law of Mr. Farquhar ; and in consequence, on the 16th December, 1826, Mr. Frazer alone obtained the letters of administration. Soon 'after Mr. Trezevant and his wife, another of the next of kin, arrived from America, and, as was alleged in the affi davit of Mrs. Mortimer, they assented to the arrangements respecting Mr; Mortimer as soon as they were told of them. However, Mr. Frazer, and some other; of the next of kin, id violation of the contract, determined to institute a suit nominally for the • administration of the estate of Mr. Far. qnhar, but in reality for the purpose of endeavouring to obtain from Mr. Mortimer what lie had received during Mr. Farquhar's lifetime, and the better to conceal the real object under the colour of an amicable suit, it was managed that Mr. Trezevant and his wife should be plaintiffs, and that all the other next of kin should be defendants without discrimination ; nor did the bill contain the slightest re fereneo tq the peculiar case of Mr. MortiMer, which was, therefore, left quite netegehe4 y his Ruswer, The bill was filed in July, 1829, and in March, 1830, an orAinary decree was taken. without any special directions whatever. However, in the course of working the decree, Mr. Trezevant with the assistance of FFFpr i curied in a charge by arliich, after imputing forgery and frapd f. 44 'Rtf r . they churged him with the receipt of 97,0001. - ana More, and with respect to -which they proposed to *Mine hill). In May, 1.831, Mr.Mortimdpiit in bid etomirt4tion, itt which, after deposing to the circumstances under which he was in duced to enter into the agreement, he affirmed that all the sums stated to be loans were in fact gifts, and that he only oved the 18,1900/. ! part of the purchase mo ne y. Up on thi s the same pafties . prnduee"d an amended state of facts, which inclusive of the 20,001., amounted 0n1if0 . 75;060/.., .and the they wept ink evidenge,to Ripped their stalereeet,Of facts. Mrs. Mortimer, whose huslaarid was then dead, en terea, also into evidence as to all , theitems of charge wept . ; Q UEEN- SQUARE. Samuel Knight, a drayman in the emplo; of Mr. Gold smith, an ale-brewer in the Horseferry-road, Westminster, ,was yesterday charged before Messrs. GREGORY and BUR RELL with negligent driving and damaging the carriage of Colonel Leith Hay. The defendant appeared voluntarily to answer the charge, in consequence of a warrant having been ;ranted by Mr. GREGORIE upon the application of Colonel Hay against a brewer's drayman named Gibbons, in the same employment, who was alleged to be the party that had offended. Robert Williams, coachman to Colonel Hay, deposed that on Wednesday last (yesterday week), between seven and eight o'clock in the evening, be was driving to the resi dence of the Colonel in Eaton-square. Re was driving at a moderate pace, and was on his left or proper side *of the road. In passing the coach-stand at Buckingham-gate, a brewer's dray turned the corner very quickly, and before witness could pull up to the opposite side, the hinder part of the dray came in contact with the pole of the carriage and snapped it in two. The horses of the carriage startled and immediately took fright, proceeding at a most rapid rate ; the footman was from the concussion thrown off the box, but witness kept his seat, endeavouring all he could to check the speed of the animals. They ultimately ran against a lamp-post, and with such violence as to knock it down, by which their course was retarded and they were prevented from committing any further damage. The wit ness added, that he could not speak as to who was driving the dray, but after the accident he noticed the defendant and another man in the garb of draymen by the horses. The defendant held the whip. Mr. GREGORIE (to the defendant)—Was you or the other man the responsible driver on the occasion ? The defendant admitted that he was. Mr. GREGORIE (to the witness)—Are you certain as to your. being on the right side of the road ? Witness—l am. I,,was.as close! as possible to the curb.•. • • ~,• Captain Graves,: residing nt.No. 2; ; Lower Belgrave street, and Mr. Joseph 'Callaway, a gentlemary residing iti Pall-mall, who. were passing by :Buckingham-gate on ,foot at the time, deposed to hearing the crash. They did not consider, from what they saw, that the coachman was at at all blameable ; the collision was instantaneous. John Narroway, the waterman at the coach stand, heard the crash, and attributed the occasion of it to the driver of the dray turning the corner too sharply. The defendant, in reply, said that the horses in the dray were very spirited ones, and it was difficult to manage them ; one of them in particular turned corners very sharply, which was the case in this instance. He heard the crash, but had no idea that it was with his dray. He could not see that he was to blame. Mr. Goldsmith said ihat he did not appear at the office to vindicate the conduct of his servant. There was a great deal of negligence with draymen in driving, and he had fre quently witnessed it in the public streets itself. He there fore thought, for the safety of the public, that they ought to be punished, when they offended, as the law directs. Mr. GREGORIE.-It appears to me that the shaft-horse must have occasioned the mischief. Defendant—The shaft horse was the most spirited of all. Mr. GREGOAIE—Can any person speak as to the amount of damage ? _ _ The son of Colonel Hay produced an invoice, stating the repairs of the carriage to amount to 131. Mr. GREGORLE said he could not, under the Act of Par liament, order the defendant to pay that amount, but he should fine him to the full extent. The defendant was then ordered to pay 51., for the da mage, and a fine of 40s. for negligent driving ; and in de fault of paying these sums he was ordered to be imprisoned. WORSHIP-STREET. Yesterday Isaac Groogeant, a policeman, No. 27, and John Pritchard, a constable under the Court Leet, and in the service of Mr. Thomas Rous, proprietor of the Eagle Tavern, in the City-road, appeared before Messrs. TWY FORD and GROVE, on a summons, charged with assaulting Mr. Frederick Brown, upholsterer, Brick-lane. The complainant stated that on Monday evening he went with his brother into the Eagle Tavern, at about half-past ten o'clock, and that in the course of the entertainments a contest arose amongst the audience as to the repetition of a song. The manager came forward, and he (complainant) got upon the table to address him in favour of the encore, when the two defendants came up to him, and he was pulled by Pritchard over the back of the seat, and very seriously hurt in the loins. Complainant was quite sober. Mrs. Harriet Tanner, sister of the complainant, and another female, corroborated the evidence. Mr. Wm. Brown, the complainant's brother, also spoke to much unnecessary violence having been used by the de fendant Pritchard. He did not consider the policeman to have committed an assault ; but to have been actuated by an endeavour to preserve the peace. Mr. TWYFORD remarked that the question was where the line was to be drawn to limit a freedom in the ex pression of pleasure or displeasure. The Magistrate then asked the policeman if his directi ons ju s tified any inter ference where an audience was excited by a difference of opinion ? Policemen said that he was only required to interfere where there was any violation of the peace, and stated that he had been six years in the police, and for the last two years has been engaged at the tavern, during which time he never witnessed such confusion as that on Monday night. There were general cries of" Turn him out" (meaning the complainant.) Defendant seeing him about to address Mr Raymond, who was on the stage, asked him to desist. his attempting again to speak, h e (defendant) interfe re d, but no excessive force was used. Mr. Orme, who has thy; arrangement of the programme of the playbills, stated for th© defen ce that he saw no as sault committed. Mr. Raymond, stage:linnager, said that there were about 500 persons present, "and that the majority of the audience were opposed t o the encore. The complainant, however, with his f'r'iend, and a few others, called loudly for a repe titien of the song. Mr. Thomas Rous, licensed victualler, said, that by his orders the defendant was removed, but as gently as possi ble. The cry of " Turn him out" was general. Mr. TWYFORD remarked that upon the evidence of the complainant's witness there was no charge against the police constable. Mr. Roils having given the order, was the res ponsible person. Mr. Rous said lie was very sorry for any injury which the complainant had received. After a long investigation, Mr. Rous agreed to pay the expenses of medical attendance. • The parties then left the Office. HATTON-GARDEN. William Cotton, a toll-collector of the Holloway turn pike gate, was summoned before Messrs. LAING and Ro- GERS, to answer the complaint of William Smith, carman to Mr. Block, farmer of Pinchley, under the following cir cumstances : The complainant deposed that on Monday last he came through Holloway turnpike, from Finchley, with an empty cart, when a boy demanded Is. lid. Witness informed himAat be was coming back with a load of dung. On his return he went to tlie toll-house, and saw the defendant, who refused to return the money. The defendant denied having received it, saying that he was not the collector on that day. Mr. ROGERS-But you are the collector, and you know that you arc bound by the Act of Parliament to return the money. llefendant—When I was applied to I did n:.t know the nature of the case. Mr. ROGERS—How dare you stand there and tell me such lies. I tell you that you have robbed that respectable man of Is. 1 id, and unless you return it, further proceed ings will be pur s u e d. Mr. Block said it was not the sum of money that he va lued, but such practices ought to be checked, and lie re quested to have a summons against the boy who received the money. Mr. lion Ens Certainly you shall have one ; I am aware of the trickery of such fellows, and they shall not im pose upon the public with impunity. The defendant agreed to return the money, and he was ordered to pay the costs, with a reprimand. UNION-HALL. James Blunden, an elderly man of respectable appearance, was charged with stealing a quantity of bricks, the property of Ned O'Neal, the pugilist, and landlord of the Rose and Crown, at Norwood. It appeared that O'Neal has for some length of time re tired from the ring, and set up in business as a publican at Norwood. Some short time back he purchased 15,000 bricks, for the purpose of erecting a cottage, and had them placed within an enclosure in the vicinity of his own dwell ing, until the bricklayers commenced their work. On Thursday last he observed a boy with a barrow taking down several bricks from the pile, and upon questioning him by whose nuthority hP had come there for such a purpose, he 't4r:Teci 1 .4 to a gentleman named Withers, on the spot, O w . knforknetl O'Neal that he ., )tic'purebased a shilling' s h a worth of the apOlOirtibort time before at his house and that under the supposition that the pile of bricks in question belonged to that person, be (Mr. W.) hd . given the boy with _ th e w h ee l-b arrow di rect i ons to ta k e them from it. - O'Neal, however, informed Mr. Withers at the'brieks were his property, and did not, belong to the. accused, upon which they were immediately reph.scEt but the latter person not having come forward to gwe an y e x . planation otr the subject, or make any apology, O'Nea l 1 ' 1 ; lied for a warrant against him for felony, and had him tisk( into custody on the charge, first Mr. WEDGWOOD, who granted the warrant in t he - instance, upon hearing the real nature of the charge , 3 - 4 that O'Neal had not stated the correct facts of the C°l when be came there to give his information against the aci cused, otherwise a warrant would not have been lo de against that person. O'Neal said that the accused had taken a shilling ful th,e, bricks, knowing that they were not his property ; and adde° that he thought this made out the case of felony ag-ainhie,i; Mr. Withers, the gentleman referred to, gave a in t '', :recount of the whole transaction, by which it appeared tli4 he purchased a small quantity of bricks of Mr. Blun de° ' who lived at Norwood, and who has a quantity of there near his dwelling. That, after the purchase, he (witocs4f instead of going to Mr. Blunden's pile, went to th at ci O'Neal, and hence the mistake arose. This fact be plained to O'Neal at the time, and went back to the accuse, who, on being informed of the circumstance, immedieefi returned the money that had been previously given to hi m for the bricks. Mr. TRAILL said that O'Neal had not the grounds for making a charge of felony against the accused It was evident that the circumstances arose from the take of Mr. Withers in directing the boy to O'Neal's P l A ` e of bricks, instead of that belonging t o th e accused ; upon an explanation to that effect, O'Neal ought to ha re been satisfied, and not brought so serious an accusatiou against a respectable man. There appeared to be-comet vindictive feeling on O'Neal's part, otherwise such cod° could not be accounted for. O'Neal still maintained that he was justified in gi . vig the accused in charge for felony. The Magistrates condemned O'Neal's conduct through. out the affair ; and, in dismissing the charge, said that tb° accused left the bar without the sligb imputation "t• Cpu a l on te l his character. CORONERS' INQUESTS. Yesterday afternoon an Inquest was held at the Lion and Lamb, Drummond-street, Somerstown, before Mr. Stirling, on view of the body of P. Conner, aged 34, in the employ of Mr. Heckett, a builder, of Hadlow-street, Burton -crescent, who was killed by falling from a scaffold ing in Belgrave-street, Argyle•square,'New-road. The deceased was perfectly sober at the time of the ac cident. Nothing of importance was elicited from the wit nesses who were examined, and the Jury returned a verdict of—" Accidental Death." The Coroner desired the Foreman to cause the parts of the broken pole to be burnt. The deceased has left a widow and several orphans. Yesterday afternoon an inquisition was taken before Mr. Stirling, the Coroner, and a jury assembled at Chalk-farm Tavern, on view of the body of Wayland Richardsod, aged 28 years, whose death was occasioned by the falling in of a portion of earth in the tunnel of the London and Birming ham Railroad, near to Primrose-hill. Mr. Joseph Curties, of No. 3, Union -terrace, Camden -town, surgeon, stated that on Monday morning last he was called to see the deceased, and found him lying dead at Chalk-farm Tavern ; he had expired a short time previously. Witness was informed that the earth had fallen on him in the tunnel of the Lon don and Birmingham Railroad ; his death was occasioned by the heavy pressure of the soil causing such severe in ternal injury as to destroy life. Edward Price, of No. 2, Bridge-wharf, Hampstead-road, contractor f9r the brick work of the tunnel at the London end of the London and Brmingham Rail-road, said the deceased was in witness's employment, and was at work with witness in the shaft No. 5, filling the excavated earth into buckets, which con veyed it to the surface of the shaft. A portion of earth overhead, nearly a yard square, fell suddenly upon him and crushed him underneath it. The other men at work with the deceased had been warned to retire which' they did, but the deceased neglected to do so. Witness was only about•three , yards from him when the accident occurred. The Coroner inquired whether any mode for the workmen carrying on their employment could not be adopted which would afford a greater security against these melancholy and fatal casualties ? Witness—l cannot think so. I have worked in mines for fourteen years, and the accident oc curred through the deceased not taking warning of the alarm given to him and the other workmen of the impend• ing danger. Several other witnesses were examined con firmatory of these facts, and the Jury, after a very lengthened and rigid inquiry, returned a verdict of " Accidental death." POLICE IN TELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. Patrick Tho»zpson, who was lately a city policeman, was brought before Mr. Alderman BROWN yesterday, charged with assaulting Frederick Ment, a jeweller, who resides at Pentouille. The complainant said that about nine o'clock the pre ceding night he was looking in at the door of an auction room in Cheapside, when a young woman, in passing, said " Don't spend your money there, or you will be plundered." He said he did not mean to spend his money, for he thought the same of it as she did ; and some person coming out of the room told him to go on. The prisoner also came out,, and tried to shove him down. Complainant threatened to give him in charge, upon which the prisoner struck him in the face and knocked him down, and struck him again as soon as he was on his legs. He supposed Thompson was a fictitious bidder. . Mr. Alderman BoowN asked the prisoner if he denied striking the complainant ?—Prisoner said no ; but the complainant provoked them by saying they were puffers. Mr. Alderman BuowN—You felt this appellation was not befitting, You were not a puffer ? Prisoner—No. Mr. Alderman BROWN—You were a bona-fide bidder? —The prisoner made no reply. Mr. AlcLerman BROWN—The assault has been sworn to, and you must find bail. Persons who may have occasion to make declarations under the new law, should not sign their names to them before they take them to the Magistrates. Where this has been done, Mr. Alderman Brown invariably erazes the sig nature, and causes it to be written anew under his obser vation, the new Act requiring the declaration to be sub scribed. as well as made in the presence of the Justice of the Peace, MARY LEB ONE. Yesterday two middle-aged men, named T. Druce and TV. Starling, the former a butler out of place, and the lat ter a shopman in the service of Miss Harriet Hatton, brush-maker and wax-Chandler, of No. 5, Mount -street, Grosvenor-square, were charged before Mr. Hosinfis, un der the following singular circumstances : It appeared from the evidence of Mr. Edward Freeman, wax-chandler, of No. 3, Wigmore-street, Cavendish square, that about six o'clock Qp the preceeding evening, the prisoner ilrgeo onteped his shop, and offered for sale of wax and spermaceti candles. Mr. Freeman sus pecting that they had been stolen, asked the prisoner how him to sell by 4 ether Plis° l o f; he came by them , when 4 the 116 replied th ey had been given to 0, w Tote trge, utsicle• §taiii,ll ( 49. 11 04 Cf l i e stfte(l, that what the and that he (St ar li ng ) h a d . wail waiting for him pqi:chased 60 candles honestly of diff erent gent l emen ' s ser vants, This answer not being de eme d sat i sfaCtory, the pri soners were ultimately taken into custody an d l o d ge d i n t h e station-house. Police-constable Williams, 51 D i s,tq lito raccla ing the prisoner Drue4 Indg,itit7 l 9 t. 11 1 .1 1, %Ye'. #*,e'h IX house" Blount-street; 116' found an immense trunk , , 9 1 .•4- . cram:lea. full of wax and spermaceti candles also a num and v4itiahle hair,bruslies,• itnd other property ; marked with the name of Bedford, Miss Hatton's rede atilesrO ° a f " Teal box, containing other arti c l es , w hi c h was. cessor in the business. Ho afterwards went to Miss Hat ton to apprise her of what had taken place, but found her confined to her bed, and consequently unable to attend. The property was here produced. Starling, who has been four years in his situation, de clined saying anything. The other prisoner said the pro perty produced wahis. They were both remanded for the attendance of Miss Hatton to identify the articles. SIIIPPING INT CLLIGENCE• T ADVICES, ARRIVAVi, AND DEPARTURES - A THE SCOTCI.I WHARFS, Novzmaza 4. et , DUNDEE AND -P-EIVIIf STEAM WHARF.—NO advices rivals. Departure' : tho Dundee, , Perth, and London 57,1; ping Company's st e am - s hi p P ert h, John Spink onron laP s l (or, Dandec, with a 'large cargo of merchandise and ',5 64 passengers. eogs' Holm's WHARF.—Advices : the Peterhead Shipping , p - ter' pany's sma c k C our i er , J o h (' R oss master, sa il e d from, e r o head 31st ult. f or thi s w h ar f. A rr i va l : t h e Wi c k and 1 1 0 51 Shipping Company's s c h ooner J o h n an d M argare t, Wm' t he master, from Wick, with a general cargo. Departure:hire, Kirkaldy and London Shipping Company's smack Fifes James Grant master, for Kirkaldy, with a general c argo. A MILLER'S WHARF.—Advice: the London and Edinb ur° , l Shipping Company's schooner Robert Bruce, VVm. And ers o master, arrived at Leith the Ist inst. No arrivals or depar t j u o is, LEITII AND GLASGOW WHARF .— No adViCES Or a rra 4/ Departure : the London and Glasgow Shipping Col n !„ - der, steam-ship Royal William, Andrew Richardson coons"' for Leith, with goods and passengers. COS' VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THS The Greyhound, KniII, HOUSE from Denia ov . and Xabia ; trwt a i s , ters, Sprague, Gijon ; Ann ' Stephens, Rio Grande ; AZet, Belles, Rotterdam ; Union, Condere, Calais ; Eclipse, r"" itt• Bruges ; Mountaineer, J ac k son , Q ue b ec ; G ener al W i lo', Sellers, Quebec ; Wellesly, Bi sso tt, Q ue b ec ; Mecleu l o ". 0 1 1 Grey, Nledemblick ; Margaret, Turpin, D av i s ' Straits; P ier. Gilman, Jersey; Pallas, Terry, Cronstadt ; UnanimitYt, bert, Oporto ; Cherub, Woodcock, Faro ; Scotia, M11,,, 0 3 Petersburg ; Comm o d ore , H ow l an , P eters b urg ; Mary, Walker, Petersb urg ; E m p or i um , T ay l or , Petevsba: Emilina, Mygers, Rouen ; D'A uvergne , C a ll as , B e lize V i rs e, garet, Brown, Trieste ; Min x , P orre tt, X a bi a : Mary, C her Montreal and Quebec ; Emerald, Paulson, Cope•nbage a te; tunes, Peters, Antwerp ; G eorge an d M ary , R ogers , uPrigiloo Atlas, Light, Gijon ; San Repos, Verstrati' , Brussels; te ; Perlerrick, Turk's Island ; R e f am p ass , Pie Zauetcht, S ec t o ; Emma, Mitchell, Guernsey ; Batavim., Dunlop, RotteXb Mary Ann, Gregory, Guernsey; Sarah, Cay, Trieste ; M {St Stevens, Trieste; Lady Rowley, Wright, Alicati; Gibbons, Oporto ; Earl of Liverpool, Lomax, Rotterdsll)* 4 , ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, N ° . 1; 0 4. The London Merchant, Vii t ti ng h am , f or C a di z ; Pw' Al' d o sh White, Naples and Palerm o; T our i st , Li ng , A n t w erp; _ Are s; Redman, Guernsey and Jersey ; Malcolm, Eyles, sdl Fraya, Long, Lisbon ; St ranger , D owse , Antwerp; m; Brougham, Forbes, Lisbon ; Ramona, Bridge, Sceptre, Doughty, Corfu ; B enga l P ac k et , St ewa rd, Cala' Munster Lass, Carrew, St. H e l ena . , 4. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, 0° .,i' 0 5, The Tweed, Sal com b e , f or Si erra L eone; B r itish Lil l " Storm, Constantinople ; T our i s t, Li ng , A n t werp . CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, NO. 4. 0 . The Hoop, Newland, f or W orcum; F ortuna , R e i s , Got te burg; Arab, Fre eman , B ar b a d oes . Rotterds..; VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. Ac ta The George Marsden, Sunderland for Quebec, 7th L',4, off St. Paul's; Ross, Hull for St. John, N.B. 11th, lat. ' 0 30. long. 54. by the Brothers, arrived at Liverpool. of Liverpool, from Mirami c hi, 17th O c t. lat. 44. 4 0 . .°' - e c t o 37. by the Alcyone, arrived at Liverpool. Prince llst packet, 28th ult., lat. 49. long. 10. by th e M a ry, arr ive of Southampton. Salus, Metcalf, from Smyrna 28th SePt„,4r, Cape Chat, by the Restitution, arrived at Glo'ucester. `0; yeller, Trinidad for Trieste, 16th ult. off CaSt. Vit e pg. Adelaide, St. Michaels for Alico 17th t.at. 37 * g' - iiss 10. by the Champion, Martir., arrived in the Sept,'Creek. k ith and Mary, of Penzance, 20th ult., off Trafalgar 1 33 Y! AO loss of bulwarks, by hi; M a j esty ' s steamer Af r ican, arr iv- ist. Falmouth. Susanr.th Ann, London to Africa, 15th ult., „ i d 40. 20. N. long. 12. 56. W. b y t h e R ac h e l, Benson, 8111 in the Dew's. ARRIVALS AT LIVERPOOL, Nov. 3 - trolls Agcnoria, Hare, from Faro ; Ebenezer, Adams , f r om Malaga ; Emma, Jarvis, from Alicant ; Thetis, Jarvigt.orlV., Xabia ; Swift, Hoppin, from Xabia, &c. ; Jean van flo ar Cornelius, from Ostend ; the Herald, Hughes, from 'fool kelty ; New Fame, Person, from Ulverstone ; Lyra, Ore ' s tbo Galway ; Thomas and Ann, Davies, from Ulverst on o l2 Myrtle, Carter, from Dartmouth ; Amboth, Ellwood, ' Wicklow. ENTERED FOR LOADING, Nov. 3. for The Tally Ho, Nicholson, for Virginia ; Bruxello is i c : s tio Antwerp; Hannibal, Dunne, for Charleston; A n th e rbr Edgar, for Demerara ; Hugh Hawthorn, Shelly, for m c o r• haven; Eliza Russell, Russell, for Havre ancl . Roue n; Jobe delia, for Laguira; Amelia, M'Master, for Madeira; o t t er. Baring, Hoff, for New Orleans ; Geziena, Taay, for 1149 for dam ; Victoria, Evans, for Seville ; Byker, Bruce/ Laguira. CLEARED OUTWARDS, Nov. 3. for The Agenoria, Fire, for Mobile; Commerce, Hui° Hayti ; Scotland, Hockstaff, for New York. TELEGRAPHED, Nov. 3. t o t e; Off port, the Mary, from Smyrna ; Madras, from Q r is/ 5 , Gronvick, from Wasa ; Shepherdess, from Palermo; `bsy from 'Trieste; Thetis, from Bordeaux; Ranger, from 130n'/. (ADVERTISENIEN.T.)—T. COX SAVORY, Go 1(11,4* Cornhill, London, informs the Public, that , r h e 00' considerable variety of SECOND-HAND GOLD WAl:a per lo!f any of which he offers at EIGHT GUINEAS each. 1 all been carefully overlooked, and arc warranted.—Watc h chased in exchange. BIRTHS. On the 4th inst., the Countess of Winterton, of a daughter;Digoe, At Dale Park, Sussex, the lady of Lieutenant-Colonel Gas o f of a son. e la ai On the 4th inst., in Chester-street, Grosvenor.plaee, t h Erskine Perry, Esq., of a daughter. MARRIED. 1 l' i t i fe ' r On the 4th inst., at Bishopsgate-street-within, Nethaneeok of Throginorton-street, solicitor, to Sarah Da Costa, only of M. D. Lindo, Esq et► DIED, On the 24th ult., Jonathan Williams, Esq., of Chsrelof -' l lll ' Grosvenor-place, second son of Isaac Lloyd Williams, EA'' d co'n's Inn, and of Cwmcynfelin, Cardiganshire, aged 33 ,..' d alite r On the 28th ult., at St. Mary's, Scilly, Pauline, cia' - '" „I 'iv James Smith, Esq., of Ashlvns Hall, Huts aged 15. , ~. 0 0 On the 2d inst., in Great Portland-street, aged 24, Falk daughter of Mr. M. Rotlwell, late of East. Harling, On the 3•1 inst., at Peckham Rye, John Akerman. Esq;L: g iOf rri On.the 4th inst., in Sloane-street, Emma Mary, '"- , daughter of Alexander Hall, Esq., aged nine months. ru nic"' On the Ist inst., at Herne Bay, Mary, the wife of Chas. ".- Esq., of Dorset-square. melt On the 3d inst., in her 73d year, Judith, wife of M e i ji b $e Tarn, of Tyndale-place, Islington, accountant to the Britt. Foreign Bible Society. i 8 oo th" On the 4th inst., in High-street, Whitechapel, age" - rii .s.a ~ sP - Murray, son of Mr. James Goldie. • s try. J Norfolk. ei oi On the 29th ult., in his 77th rear, and 50th of his mini d i .--• Rev. James Mitchell, of the Scottish Presbyterian Cillrivate Wooler. In the early part of his life, Mr. Mitchell wa s r th tutor to Sir Walter Scott. t A li ' t On the 20th ult., at Cranbrook, in his 83d year, Robe' ej M.D. On the 30th ult., at Sutton-in-Ashfield, Mr. Robert C l a y, for 66. He had been in the s e r vi c e of Messrs. Unwin and he or more than 50 years, and during that time had not suffered t" page of a single day's pay. . 0 , 4 11.• On the 27th ult., at Cranbrook, aged 83, Mr. Joseph ' J - _, On the 19th ult., aged 80, Mrs. Massey, of Sheerneas•,,,h y 0::, On the 18th ult., at Denhead, parish of Banff, in her u:7 - 3 ,0 Isabel Fraser, widow of James Burnett, and daughtern/le eat Fraser, who was landgrieve to the Earl of Findlater, i_ i e l nar tiel l ' part of last century. Her memory was quite entire, aß l ir, - 0 05.d larly vivid as to the times and circumstances of her earlie.st ) late On the 30th ult., at Bath, Jan Caspar Hartsinck, E ,( 1" Amsterdam, aged 81. l a teof On the 19th ult., Millecent, relict of E. Lucas , Esq ., it Royal Mint, aged 89. On the 28th ult., at the residence of her son , A. Roberts, Llangwyfan Rectory, Denbighshire, Mrs. flu"` Pe r Brynmorwydd, in her 81st year. tha Rev.L• es, l' o'i On the 22d inst., at Cupar Angus, Mr. David G raham ' ° chant, aged 73. Jam On the 3d inst., in Regent-street, Emma, the wife of 'Mathews, Esq., aged 21. ea P'' On the 27th ult., at Falmouth; William Genn , Esq., ag ------------------- London : Printed and Published by mtmtllo YoUN 112, Strand, at The Sun' ()face N 11 0 Strand in the , . OPT THE do h AUCTION .11th, and T 'forenoon prt of Accoutre pet and p Coats, Tent • Iron s, Jack SPedes, Sho Cramps, an( andlfixod . \Vire, Gyn S taves for Vellum and consisting 0! ' The whol • 'eot, Too] ?LOU- P s to the Principal St . the Lots, a Persona whc AP PE the .IVESLEYI