The Sun. — London, England, 1835-11-04 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. have probably since changed their opinion about the propriety of the policy pursued by M. Mendizabal, but it happened that while, on the one hand, they were expressing their disapprobation respecting it, on the other, whether intentionally or acci dentally we do not pretend to decide, more than usual stress was laid by them on the pro gress of operations in the Pretender's camp, and the reported brightness of his prospects. The Debats having long borne the credit of being the depository of the views and sentiments of a majority of members of the French Cabinet, its remarks on Mendizabal's policy and of the Pretender's prospects went to establish a belief in the public mind in Paris, that the French Government had withdrawn, or was about to withdraw, its support from the cause of Isabella, for the purpose of favouring the pretensions of Don Carlos. This view of matters, resting entirely on the Debats' apparently altered tone respecting the affairs of Spain, was re-echoed by the public press in this country, with perhaps the single exception of this journal. It did not seem to us that the ar ticles in the DAats' which caused so much sensation spoke the sentiments of any members of the Cabinet on that particular occasion, and we stated the reasons which made it, on the contrary, appear that those it uttered were at variance with those which were attri buted to every one of the French Ministers, and to which, indeed, they were bound by the mere existence of the quadrupartite treaty. The late trial of Latapie supplied abundant proof as to the fact that the Prime Minister, to whose inspirations the articles in the De bats were chiefly ascribed, had had no more to do with them than the designing braggart Latapie, who, for reasons no longer best known to himself, declared that they had passed from his own hands to those of the Ministers, and from the latter's to the columns of the Journal des Debats. But the matter, which might well have ended here, is not vet suffered to rest. We are assured, day after day, by some one or other of the Paris papers, that the British Government, alarmed at the change of policy implied both by the altered lan guage of the Debuts and the apparent laxity of the police along the Pyrenees, has addressed strong re monstrances to the French Government, in whose be half the Duke de Broglie has lately offered the strongest assurances to Lord Granville that the Journal de Debats had ceased to be the accredited organ of the Cabinet. Some papers here have caught at this flimsy story of the Paris Opposition press, and after a series of articles of unmea sured abuse against the French Government, so long as it was suspected of a growing partiality for the Carlist cause, are now unsparing of their panegyric on its sincerity and firmness, as evinced by the Duke de Broglie's declaration to Lord Granville, that the Journal des Debats has ceased to be the organ of the French Cabinet. None of the wiseacres who have been expending such quantities of ink on all this mass of allegations, suppositions, errors, and rectifications, have taken the trouble to inform the world of the ground on which rests their last statement, to the effect that the Duke de Broglie had made any such declara tion about the Debats to Lord Granville. It is evi dently as idle a cancan, picked up at the Bourse or some coffee-house, as any of those which have preceded it. Inserted with that avidity with which the greater number of the Paris- Journalists are in the habit of giving currency and authority to every idle rumour of the day, it seems on all sides now to be taken for granted —and we arc desired to believe—that the late growing coolness or misunderstanding, between the Govern ments of France and England has been quite checked, and they are again the best friends in the world. \\ should be among the foremost in rejoicing at such a reconciliation, had we conceived that there had been any interruption of rood understanding between the British and French Governments ; but we intend re serving our joy for a tit opportunity, seeing that there has . lately been no occasion for its display. The French Government has evidently not had the slightest intention to change its policy regarding Spain, and if the British Government has addressed to it any re marks respecting the mode of giving the utmost effi cacy to the quadripartite treaty, it was probably owing to the contrivances by which smugglers were inces santly eluding the vigilance of the guards stationed on the Pyrenees, and providing the insurgents with sup plies. We believe it will be found difficult to put an entire stop to the contraband communications in that quarter, unless the French corps of 25,000 men were to be considerably increased ; but as we stated on Monday, the great scarcity of cash which now pre vails in the Carlist camp, and the little promise of any new supplies of that commodity, will stop the commu nications much more effectually than any French army could be expected to do. As to the Journal des De bats, it has formally declared, that although a Minis terial paper, because its friends have long been in of fice, and it has approved their policy of internal go vernment, it never had made itself a tool to any men in office. In reference to what was stated respecting the Duke de Broglie's declaration to Lord Granville, it expresses itself as follows :—" We are quite sure that the Duke de Broglie never made such a declara tion to any one. The Journal des Debats has never been the organ of the French Government ; it has shown its independence in the discussion of every question, and it never waited for the inspirations of any Minister to speak in one sense or the other. It is sin cerely friendly to the Administration at the head of which the Duke de Broglie is so well pleated, and it has often had occasion to defend that Administration ; but it certainly never made itself a Ministerial organ on the subject of Foreign Affairs."—Times. The more temperate and judicious friends of Lord Melbourne's Government have recently evinced a re markable degree of anxiety to rescue his Lordship and his colleagues from the ruin which must, it is per ceived, speedily overtake them, should they appear, at the present moment, in too active and zealous co. operation, or united by the ties of too warm a sym pathy, with the revolutionary politicians who demand the re-construction of the House of Lords, on the in solent and absurd ground that this noble, enlightened, and independent branch of the Legislature does not yield upon all occasions a prompt, servile, and impli cit obedience to the Ripons, the Roebucks ) the Humes, and the O'Connells, who supply Ministers with their necessary working majority in the House of Commons. The Ministerial adiocates, however sen sible, as they evidently are, to the danger to the Ad ministration which must attend the avowal of an alliance so derogatory and inauspicious as that oc undisguised revolutionists, are at least equally sensible that, sneaking in the name and on behalf of Lord Mel bourne's Government, they cannot afford distinctly to renounce and reject it. They condemn the various projects of the Reformers of the House of Lords as imprudent and ill-timed, considering the actual situa tion and temper of the country, but do not venture to denounce them as essentially and permanently absurd, mischievous, and wicked, in every imaginable position of public affairs, and every possible state of the public mind. According to these Ministerial reasoners it is not from reverence and attachment to the British Constitution, of which the actual constitution and powers of the House of Lords are essential arid in separable parts, .that the design of abolishing or remodelling that august assembly should be aban doned. It i s mere l y from reverence and attachment to Lord Melbourne's Ministry, to the existence o f which, it is imagined, the immediate agitation of such revolutionary schemes wol'id be dangerous, that they should be postponed—postponed until some convenient season of national distress or of pc) , pular excitement, wb..."en they may be urged forward with a better Dr_ ..,spect of success, or, at least, without involving .itie overthrow of an Administration always rea(1:),- to e flatter, to humour, and to gratify, if not im plicitly and unreservedly to o b e y, ever y capr i c i ous an d transient fluctuation of temper and disposition among the lowest, the more ignorant, and the more excitam pc l r a u s d s e e n s t o e f en t n h n e m people e ; r o e r s n p u o r s e t e p s o n n f e d fa , i a n t n h , e rather, n t w i hh the members of the Melbourne Ministry being no longer in place, th ese revo l ut i onary schemes may serve as effective instruments of annoyance and hostility to their constitutional and Conservative successors. The un principled cunning displayed upon this subject by the scribblers and declaimers in the service of the Admi nistration is not, indeed, the mere suggestions of their own depraved and unauthorised ingenuity. When Lord Melbourne, knowing all that had been said in the House of Commons in reference to the constitutional eitist- In a late number of the Frankfort Journal there is a letter copied from a Dutch paper on the pre sent state of the alliance between France and England. The conjectures and reasonings of the writer of that letter acquire importance, inasmuch as they are adopted by the Holy Alliance Gazette as " worthy of serious attention." We are told by the author of this communication, that Louis Phillippe has no longer the came need of support from England which he had in 1831 and 1832—that those whom he then looked upon as enemies, he now considers as friends—that he was then at the mercy of England, whereas now, matters being reversed, England is at the mercy of the King of the French. " I would only ask (continues the writer), in proof of what I have said, what could England do for Belgium if France did not assist her ? what could England do for Spain if France did not act in unison with her? what could she do in the East, if France abandoned her ? and, to put another question, still more alarming for Great Britain than any of the three just set down, what could England do with respect to Belgium, Turkey, and Spain, if France not only did not go with, but ranged itself against her ?" Consi dering that these questions proceed from a party noto riously hostile to the alliance between France and England, we think that they do indeed deserve the " serious attention" of the two countries. It is true that the King of the French, although he owes his throne to the barricades, is now admitted amongst the legitimate Monarchs of Europe. It was always our policy to assist him in the establishment of his throne amongst the Sovereignties of the Continent, as upon its security hinged the preservation of peace, not only in France, but in all the surround ing nations. The development which the repre sentative principle received, in consequence of the revolution of July, produced a decided tendency to a strict union between the French and British people. Notwithstanding a series of measures which have been adopted by the French Ministers, with a view to resist the impetus towards reform which the barricades had given to the popular mind, the alliance which thus grew up between the two nations has become stronger every year—and we are convinced, especially from all that we have recently observed, that any grave at tempt on the part of the Cabinet of France to sepe rate that country from the politieal system of which England forms a part, would be fatal to the exist ence of that Government. What has occurred within the last month upon the Spanish question is a proof of this. From some cause or other, into which we shall not now inquire. the Paris Ministerial journals were instructed to im part to all the intelligence from the Peninsula the most gloomy colours. Tidings illustrative of the pro gress of anarchy in that country were eagerly re ceived ; bare surmises were reasoned upon as facts ; gross fabrications were admitted as indisputable ; even the telegraph became so often the messenger of false• hood, that it lost all credit on the Exchange. It was predicted that Mendizabal could not by possibility succeed in restoring his country to order ; and great pains were taken to show that upon Don Carlos alone depended the future hopes of Spain. What has been the result ? All the Liberal journals, both here and in France, saw distinctly the object which a party in the French Government had in view. We sounded the alarm at both sides of the Channel, and drew the attention not only of the two countries, but of all Europe, to the irtrigues which were going on somewhere. We spoke the sentiments of the people—tile united people of Great Bri tain and France—we proclaimed the alliance be tween us to be in danger, and we thundered at the door of the French Cabinet, until we obtained a gua rantee that neither the alliance nor the liberty of Spain should be sacrificed to the views of the Northern League. This was a popular victory. It has saved Spain—it will not be without its influence, upon the internal policy of France—it has given fresh vigour to tile Quadruple Alliance, by shewing how deeply bound up with the sympathies of the French and the British people are the stipulations of that sacred compact. It is idle, therefore, for any writer to ask, what can Eng land do here or there without the assistance, or in op position to the will of France ? The two countries are iiiejiarible the'r interests. Governments may ditajree for a moment, or intrigue may beget suspicions and threaten a departure from the union : but such perfidy cannot be productive of any permanent effect. It will he fatal only to those who persevere in it with any degree of obstinacy, and will show the triumphant power which the representative principle can exercise when it is really roused into action. As the party to whom we allude have now discovered that tile alliance between the two nations cannot be lightly treated, or put on or off aceording to their caprice, we trust that they will accept it sincerely, ,and surround it with all the graces of cordiality. It will assuredly be a noble spectacle for the generous minds of the world, in what ever climate they breathe, to behold these two great nations who warred against each other in the days of superstition and ignorance, almost without cessation, now truly enlightened as to their highest interests, and continuing their best exertions to promote the exten sion of civilization, and liberty, and happiness, through every community to which their influence can reach. —lClorning Chronicle. We know'not that the people of England can be blamed for viewing with suspicion the conduct of the Duke of Cumberland, with reference to Orange So cieties. It will be difficult for that Illustrious Per sonage to show that he was not aware of the nature of the proceedings at the various meetings at which he presided ; and when we find that at these meetings various resolutions were adopted for the establishment of lodges in a number of regiments, we must either suppose his Royal Highness an idiot, which he is not, or that he was cognizant of the attempts to gain over the army. The treasonable language with which Haywood charges" Colonel Fairman might be overlooked, were it not in unison with the let ters of that individual, which are evidently feelers thrown out to try the temper of the Tory Lords. There are fifty thousand Orangemen in London alone. With the command of the army, at which the Illstrious Duke was aiming, the control of the po lice (for the Orangemen were by times thrust into the police) and Orange bands in every large town, less daring personages than his Royal Highness might have their heads turned. From his proximity to the Throne, he is the last man who ought to be allowed to place himself at the head of a secret society of this formidable character. The myrmidons of his Royal Highness appear to have had their eyes betimes on Kensington Palace. What, for instance, is the mean ing of the following passage in a letter signed NV. H. Gray (May, 1831) addressed to Colonel Fairman : " I have reflected seriously whether our excellent Grand Master may not, (on account of political prejudices) deem it prudent for the present to suspend the establishment of a lodge so decidedly characterised for his Royal son, as Sir J. P., our worthy brother, wishes it to be, if he take the Mastership, i. e. under the proposed title of Prince George's Lodge. Permit me, dear Sir and Brother, to suggest the title of The Royal Cumberland or Brunswick Lodge,' No. ; and to be fully, but privately, understood by us to be dedicated or established especially for the se curity of the young Prince ; and at or near Kensington, that we may have the support of his Royal Aunt ; much more respectable than at Brentford. I could render you much better aid under this arrangement, because of the pre judices and shyness of persons to identify themselves in sup port of anything not decidedly popular." To establish a lodge at the very door of Kensing ton Palace, in order to gain over the servants of the Princess Victoria, by initiating them in this secret so ciety, was an ingenious device. We trust the Royal Aunt will be better advised than to lend her support to any such dangerous schemes.—Morning Chrome' .e. The Fre nc h O ppos i t i on papers h ave not ye;, done with the Journal des Mats and its late articles on Spain. Our readers may remember that the last named journal had appeared little satisfied with the course adopted by M. Mendizabal after his arrival in Madrid, and chose to find fault with the early steps taken by that Minister towards the pacification of the country, which he had found up in. arms against the Government. The promises held out to the Juntas by M. Mendizabal were taxed by the Debats as weak ness, and great were the future evils which that paper predicted as the necessary effects of what it called pusillanimous concession. The writers of the Debats .~. ~. '- . e ,... r ~.,- . -~;. ..+.tea=~ 0.:., THE SUN, LONDON, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1835. ence and attributes of the House of Lords—knowing,' too, all that the Ministerial journalists were - daily labouring to inculcate—attempted to deter that inde pendent and illustrious branch of the Legislature from the performance of its Constitutional duty, by holding out the menace of a revolutionary attack upon his character and privileges, he plainly indicated to all the allies and confederates of his Ministry—paramount and subordinate, to the O'Connells and the Ripons, to the Roebucks and the Humes, of whom his Mi nistry is the slave, as well as to the Chronicles, and the Mercuries, and the Reviews, who are the slaves of his Ministry—what in his judgment was the most expedient course for them to pursue. Nor was .a less distinct intimation of the policy of the Administration afforded by Lord John Russell and the other Mem bers of the Administration in the House of Commons, when, night after night, they heard speeches made by their partisans, by men whose votes are the very breath of their Ministerial nostrils, directly impugn ing the independent authority, and threatening the constitutional existence, of the Upper House of Parliament—when night after night they heard notices of motions given for next session to the same effect— and when, so far from rebuking and chastising, as con stitutional and patriotic ministers of the Crown would have rebuked and chastised, these ebullitions of revo lutionary insanity and wickedness, and these indica tions of a determined revolutionary purpose, they united in the senseless cry against the House of Lords for hav inc, exerted its legitimate authority ; and intimated that, as individual Members of Parliament, they entertained the least possible respect for its decisions. It is evident from all that has taken place notwithstanding the lan guid and partial disclaimers which the constitutional feelings and deliberate good sense of the country have extorted from some portions of the Ministerial press, that the Melbourne Ministry have determined to avail themselves of any advantage which in or out of office, a revolutionary attack upon the House of Lords can afford them as a political party ; that, although they dare not just now sanction the unconstitutional pro jects of Mr. O'Connell, Mr. Roebuck, Mr. Ripon, and Mr. Hume, they are not by any means disposed to excite the displeasure of those gentlemen and their adherents by an uncompromising and strenuous re sistance—that they are willing to regard the destruc tion of the House of Lords as a neutral question so far as the Ministers of the Crown are concerned—and that if they do not at once adopt the measure as a por tion of their Ministerial policy, they have no aversion to preserve it in the armoury of- their party, as a shaft to be employed against their political antagonists, whenever, with envenomed point and adequate momen tum, it can be successfully or advantageously let fly.— Morning Post. which may have become payable within the six calendar months next before the said last day of August, and further, who shall also during all that time have been householders. This last provision will disqualify hun dreds in many large towns. It should be borne in mind also, that upon this revision no difficult question of law can arise, and a -very small degree of management and . arrangement will easily obviate a difficulty which has been suggested, as to the rate-book not being able to be in two Courts at once. It should also not be for gotten that the borough fund is to bear the expense of this revision, and this fact, we have no doubt, will have a surprising influence with both sides in quickening the despatch of business, and of getting out of their town as speedily as possible such expensive, though we by no means intend to insinuate overpaid, visiters as Revising Barristers.—Morning Herald. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. The Reform of the House of Lords is the test by which, in future, will be ascertained the sincerity of every man who professes a desire for the promotion of rational liberty. That House has ever placed itself in opposition to the enactment of all measures tend ing to ameliorate the condition, or extend the rights of the great body of the nation, and every Reform for the common good has been carried through the hereditary Chamber only by means of popular ex citement, almost tantamount to a general convulsion. Thus. was carried the Catholic Relief Bill, when simultaneous meetings throughout Ireland, where a word would have kindled a watchfire on every hill, proclaimed to the Government that there was no alter native left but concession or civil war. Thus was carried the Reform Act, when the men of the Birmingham and other Unions were preparing to march upon the metropolis, and in person present their petitions for a redress of grievances. And thus in the last Session would have been carried the ori ginal Mmnicipal Reform Bill, had not the people been induced to delay the assertion of their power in de ference to the promises of a liberal Ministry, who deemed it more expedient to make concessions to a faction than risk a collision by a bold and firm adhe rence to the popular cause. With such evidence be fore us of inveterate hostility, would it not be mad ness to expect that the House of Lords can be ever brought to act in harmony with the people's represen tatives until the constitution of that body undergo a thorough reformation ? To suppose that unity of action or of purpose can exist between a reformed House of Commons, representing the wishes and in terests of the people, and an unreformed House of Lords, representing only their oivn peculiar interests, which are diametrically opposed to those of the people, is an absurdity too monstrous to find a place in the mind of any rational man—its assertion could he made only by a hypocrite or a fool. The very phraseology of the House of Lords precludes all hope of co-operation in the great work of national re generation--every measure for the restitution of public plunder they have stigmatised as robbery—every mea sure for the restitution of popular rights they have de nounced as revolution ; and only when external pressure made further resistance unavailing or dangerous, have they yielded to necessity what they had denied to jus tice. In reference to the measures, delayed, mutilated, or rejected by the second branch of the Legislature, Lord John Russell well observed, in reply to an ad dress presented by the inhabitants of Plymouth, De vonport, and Stonehouse—" They (the Lords) have exercised their undoubted privilege, whether wisely or no it is for you, and not for me, to determine." His Lordship, in this regard, evinced a due appreciation of the right, as well as the power, of the national con stituency to decide on the measures most applicable to the exigencies of the times. And after the ex pression of such an opinion, as well as the admission, that the Lords had opposed every liberal measure ,‘or the last seven years, it was with equal astonish ment and regret that we observed his Lordship to have recommended the people " to look for the triumph of further measures of reform rather to the effect of public opinion, enlightened and matured by knowledge and discussion, than to organic changes, which cannot be proposed without causing division, nor carried without risk of convulsion." However appropriate this sentence might appear, if uttered by Sir R. Peel, its expression by the liberal leader of the House of Commons was worse than injudicious. What measure of Reform have the Lords conceded to the expression of PulliiC opinion until a con , vulsiot became imminent ? None. What hope can therefore be entertained of them for the future ? The question is, whether we shall at bike make an effort, and even risk tOnviision, to reform the House of Lotds, or be under the necessity of incurring an equal risk f or ever y se p ara t e measure o f R e f orm , w - hieh the necessities of the times make imperative ? The Reform of the House of Commons was carried at the risk of a convulsion, and at the time the same or a greater risk would have been necessary to carry almost any minor measure of popular good. Even since then, during the last Session, we were on the verge of a con vulsion before the mutilated Municipal Reform Bill was permitted to come into operation by the hereditary Senate. And as before the Reform of the House of Commons it would have been useless, and injudicious, to propose the Municipal, the Church, or any other great measure which might divert public attention from the paramount question, so at present should all other topics be put in abeyance, and the whole weight of public opinion concentred on the Reform of the House of Lords.—Morning Advertiser. A genteelly dressed man, who said that his name was John Thompson, but who is believed to have a very diffe rent name, was brought before the LORD MAYOR under the following circumstances : A married woman stated, that as she was passing through a court at about six o'clock on the previous evening she was grossly insulted by the defendant. A little girl, the daughter of an officer who resided in the court, was soon after the above-mentioned occurrence passing through it on a message for her mother, and was addressed by the defendant, who told her that she was a pretty girl, and asked her to meet him next night, and he would take her to the play. She told him that she must not go, and she passed on. Upon her return in a couple of minutes she found him waiting for her, and he took hold of her. Her father, however, accidentally saw the fellow stooping down to the child, and immediately took him into custody. His object was, from the description of his conduct by the little girl, quite palpable. The defendant expressed much anxiety to have the wo man who brought the first charge sworn, and upon being told that she was sworn, asked her whether she was sure she told the truth P—The witness replied that the insult was so undisguised it was impossible anybody could have mistaken it. The LORD MAYOR (to the defendant)—What are you, and what have you say in your defence ?—The defendant said that he was in the wine trade, and that he lived over the water. He was so stupified with drinking that he did did not recollect an atom of the transaction with respect to the woman, and all he recollected about the little girl was, that he spoke to her by accident. The LORD MAYOR asked the officer who apprehended the defendant, whether it was true that the defendant was drunk ?—The officer replied that the man had not the slightest appearance of intoxication. The constable of the night stated that the defendant de clared himself that he was quite sober at the time, not hav ing drunk anything but a little wine with his dinner. Defendant (to the officer)—Did you not offer if you got 501. to drop the matter ? Officer—Never ; I was as near possible punishing you on the spot, but I thought it better to leave you to the Lord Mayor. The LORD MAYOR—Very well ; I shall commit him as a rogue and vagabond to Bridewell for one month. Doubts have been expressed in some quarters, and amongst others in the Ldzu Magazine, whether the revision of the Burgesses' lists under the Municipal Act can be satisfactorily completed within the time assigned, viz., the Ist day of December, and the 15th, both inclusive; which, excluding two Sundays, will give 13 whole days to be employed in the revision. Now we must confess that we do not seS any fair ground for such doubts, it is bile, as we a re t o ld, but not bl that in each cas e o f - or objection it ma y be nec,..,..ary for the Barri s t er t o in spect all th e rates ma d e f rom J an . I st, 1833, to 31st P t ^a l l probae, a e, Aug., 1835, and examine the overseers relating to them ;" and it is further stated that some parishes contain " many thousand inhabitants ; " though this may be true, yet we will undertake that there are very few throughout the kingdom which contain any such number of persons who shall have been rated to all rates for the relief of the poor of the parish in which the premises for which they may claim to vote are situate, during the years 1833, 1834, and 1835, and who shall have paid, before the last day of August in this year, all such rates. evnant. thr MAR YLEB ONE. Yesterday a gentlemanly-looking middle-aged man, named IVilham Claughton, appeared on a summons obtained against him by Mr. William Hull, an attorney, charging him with wilfully disturbing the congregation assembled at Totten ham-court Chapel, otherwise the Tabernacle, on Sunday, the 18th ult. Mr. Clarkson appeared to support the complainant ; and Mr. Clarke, a solicitor, attended on behalf of the defendant. Mr. Clarkson, in opening the case, said the chapel was in the Court of Chancery, and the conducting of it in the hands of twelve trustees ; three of whom, Messrs. Pryer, Embrier, and Morgan, were appointed as acting managers. The summons was granted under the Act of Parliament passed in the .52d year of Geo. 111., for the protection of dissenting places of worship, chap. 10.5 of which enacts, " That if any person or persons shall wilfully disturb or dis quiet any congregation of persons assembled for religious worship, they shall, upon being convicted of the offence at the sessions, suffer the pain and penalty of 401." The first witness called was— Mr. Nathaniel Ayres, of No. 30, Cirencester-place, New road, who stated that he was clerk at the Tottenham-court Chapel, and received his appointment in writing from Mr. Pryer, with the concurrence of Messrs. Embrier and Mor gan, on the 25th of March, 1834. The defendant was in the habit of frequenting the chapel, and knew what office witness filled. Recently several disturbances had taken place, the defendant always taking an active and leading part in them. On the evening of Sunday, the 18th ult., witness took his seat at his desk as usual, and at the commencement of the service gave out a hymn, which he, assisted by some of the congregation, sang, and, having finished it, sat down again, but had no sooner done so than the defendant, who was standing at a table, between the pulpit and reading-desk, proceeded to give out another hymn of quite a different tune, and, assisted by his party, sang it, thereby causing great confusion, and dis turbing him in his situation as cerk. The defendant af terwards being remonstrated with upon his conduct, said he (lid not do it of his own free will, but was authorised to do it by other persons. Cross-examined byMr. Clarke—The first of the disturb ance, to the best of his belief, took place on Sunday the 4th of October, when witness and the congregation having sung a hymn, the defendant and his party sang another. Wit ness was never told by Mr. Bateman, one of the trustees, that his services were no longer required. Mr. Canaby. another clerk to the chapel, deposed that be had filled his situation for the last nineteen years, and that his duty was to officiate on Sunday afternoons and Tuesday and Thursday evenings. On the evening in ques tion he was in the chapel, and witnessed the above-men tioned conduct of the defendant, which he believed created great confusion among the congregation. By Mr. Clarke—More persons stood up on the defend ant announcing his hymn than on Mr. Ayres giving out his. Mr. William Hull, the gentleman who took out the sum mons, stated that he was a member of the congregation. On the evening of Sunday, the 18th of October , he was at the chapel, and observed the strange conduct of the defendant, which annoyed him, and in his belief was calculated to dis turb the congregation. Witness saw several persons leave the chapel in consequence. Mr. Joseph Paul, the reader of prayers, deposed to the disturbance the defendant's conduct caused, The Rev. Arnott White deposed that he was in the habit of attending the chapel, and was one of the trustees he was not there on the evening in question, but on tWo or three previous occasions the defendant and his friends had commenced sip,,critlg lipti after the one given out by Mr. Ayres Was finished He knew Mr. tateman had tried to get Mr. Ayres discharged from his Bittiatioti, There being no further evidence adduced, Mr, Clarke said the defendant was appointed clerk by Mr. Bateman, the enly qUalified trustee, and that he was joined in his hymns by the congregation the eiteep tion of about ten persons, who were brought in by Mr, Ayres. lie had several witnesses to call. Mr. Hostaxs here said, that, understanding that there were no witnesses who could deny that a disturbance had taken place on the evening of the 18th ult., he should de cline hearing any more, but require the defendant to find tail, himself In 1001., and two sureties in M. each, to answer the charge at the Sessions, ldail was immediately tendered and aceepted, and the Office, which was crowded to excess during the proeeedings, was then cleared. THAMES POLICE. Yesterday Mr. William Beaver Walker, the landlord of the Marquis of Granby public-house, in Drury-lane, was charged before Mr. BALLANTINE and Mr. COMBE with carrying two gallons of brandy without a permit, by which he had incurred a penalty not exceeding 1001., nor less than 251, or imprisonment, with hard labour, for three or six months. Charles Falconer and George Judge, surveyors of Thames Police, stated that on M on d ay even i ng t h ey met the defendant in Pickett-street, opposite St. Clement's Church, carrying a bottle cont a i n i ng t wo ga ll ons o f b ran d y , and on demanding his permit he said he had not got one. They seized the liquor and took him into custody. Mr. BALLANTINE called on Mr. Walker for his defence. Mr. Walker stated that a f r i en d, res idi ng i n the C i ty, wa s making extensive alterations in his house, and the workmen had disturbed some casks and ren d er ed th e brandy unsaleable , and in this exigency had called upon him for the loan of two gallons, an d h e was not b e f ore aware he was doing wrong in removing that quantity without a perm i t , He thought he could send out two gallons, or under, without one. ,r 1 I' • -1 who u eienuatn. s ll7Cuu, Carries on a lame business in the City, begged leave to say a f ew wor d s . He alone was to blame, for he had importuned Mr. Walker to lend him two gallons of brandy, owing to the confusion which his house was In, and the workmen disturbing his casks. They both leboured , under an impression that two gallons could be removed without a permit, Mr. Comnn--That is the impression of th e ma jority of the trade, but any quantity exceeding a gallon requires a permit. The defendant and his friend appealed to the officers for the truth of what they had stated ; and Falconer and Judge said they had no doubt what had been stated was the fact. Mr. BALLANTINE said that was all very fair between two _ L , _ • _ 'Lung nn doubt they had acted in ignorance of the law ; but that was no answer to the - charge, and he was bound to convict ; for ignorance could not be received as an excuse for breaking the law, which every licensed victualler carrying on business was bound to know. There were no aggravating circumstances in the ease, and he sentenced the defendant to pay a fine of 251. to the King, or to be imprisoned and kept to hard la bour for three months. The defendant's friend said he had led Mr. Walker into the error, and he,felt bound to pay the penalty, which was instantly done. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. George Avery, the driver of a cart, was yesterday brought before Mr. CONANT on the following charge : The horse which the defendant was driving in Green street, Leicester-square, on Monday evening last, took fright, as stated, at the barking of a dog, and in the efforts of the driver to pull the animal up, the reins broke. The horse dashed through Leicester-square, and in its progress knocked down a woman, and it is supposed fractured her skull, and ran the cart against a man named William Tay lor with such violence that the shaft penetrated to his lungs, and caused almost immediate death. The body of the man was taken to Westminster Hospital to await the inquest, and the defendant was ordered to be remanded until the result of the inquiry was known. QUEEN-SQUARE. Yesterday three urchins, named Martin, Colyer, and Bailey, were brought up in custody of "the police, charged with a robbery under the following audacious circumstances : It appeared from the evidence that on the previous even ing a quantity of druggett and baize was left in the back premises of Mr. Atkinson, of the Westminster-road. In the morning the whole was gone. Between twelve and one o'clock in the morning the three boys, the eldest of whom is not more than ten, were met by a policeman with the property in their possession. The policeman stated that the boys must have climbed over a high railing to effect the robbery. The Magistrate, after lamenting the depravity of such children, committed them for trial. UNION HALL. Yesterday William George King was brought before Mr. TRAILL, charged on suspicion with having set fire to a warehouse belonging to Messrs. Legg and Co., woolsta piers, of Bermondsey, containing property to the amount of between 30,000/. and 40,000/. A Gentleman named Meredith on passing along Gun alley, Bermondsey, where Messrs. Legg's warehouses are situate, about ten o'clock on Monday night, saw a vivid light in the interior, and immediately went up to one of the windows, and on looking through the bars saw flame and smoke ascending from a large package within a short dis tance from the window. He immediately gave the alarm, the keys of the warehouse were procured, and water being speedily brought to bear on the part where the fire broke out, it was extinguished in a short space of time, and before any of the property, consisting of wool, had sustained much damage. Upon subsequent inspection of the warehouse it was discovered beyond a doubt that some combustible ma terials were introduced into the warehouse with the design of setting fire to the property, and that some person must have done it from without the building, as a por tion of the window in Gun-alley was broken for the pur pose of introducing the materials intended for the destruc tion of the premises. The windows of the warehouse in Gun-alley were so close to the foot pavement that they were easily reached by a person going along the place, so that much difficulty would not be experienced by any one having so horrible a design as that of setting the place on fire to carry it into effect, the only security being the glass windows and bars, without shutters of any kind. The da mage done to the property on the occasion was confined to that which was next to the window in Gun-alley, and in order to effect such a diabolical design as that which was intended, it was necessary to cast some inflammable mate rials amongst the wool, the only article contained in the warehouse to cause the destruction of the whole ; wool being an article not easily ignited, but when once set in a flame burns rapidly. Mr. Legg stated that subsequently to the above occur rence the prisoner was taken into custody on suspicion of having been the person who attempted to set fire to the warehouse, and added that the following circumstances gave rise to the degree of suspicion attached to him on the occasion. The prisoner had worked in the employ of the firm at various periods during the last six years, and he left a day or two previously to the discovery of the fire in the warehouse. On Saturday morning last the prisoner called at the counting-house, and, addressing Mr. Legg, said that he came there to speak to him, adding, that he came there for the purpose of telling him something that he would be very sorry to hear. Mr. Legg, however, per ceiving that the prisoner had been drinking, desired him to call the next day, and refused to listen then to what he had got to say. The prisoner did not call again, and from the expressions he had used on the occasion alluded to, as well as some other circumstances which occurred subsequently to his apprehension, the suspicion was strengthened against him. The prisoner, when asked if he wished to say anything, exhibited a great anxiety to explain where he had been, and what he had been doing since he left Mr. Legg's employ. He said that he and his wife lived on bad terms, and that he had made up his mind to leave her and go to sea. With this intention he left home on Saturday, and went to look for a ship to go abroad 4 He then gave a minute account of how he had spent Saturday and Sunday, and said that he called on Mr. Legg, wi:h a view to tell him that he intended to part with his wife and to go abroad. This, he said, was the reason he went to the counting-house to see that Gen tleman. In accounting for his time on Monday, the pri soner said he had been engaged a portion of that day also in looking for a ship, and that he went home between five and six o'clock in the afternoon, and did not stir out of his house aaain that evening. He declared his innocence of -such an offence as that with which he was charged, and said that he had no against Mr. Legg, who was always a good and benevolent master to him. The prisoner having varied in his account of the manner in which he spent his time to Inspector Fagan, that officer was directed to make further inquiries into the case, and the prisoner was remanded. INSOLVENT COURT---T UESDAY. Yesterday, Thomas Gardiner, described of Mayfield street, Hoxton, tailor, was opposed by Mr. Cooke for a creditor, named James Mudford, of Kingsland-road, woollen draper, whose debt was 801. and upwards. Air. WOODROFFE supported the petition. The insolvent underwent a very rigid examination, from which it appeared that his debts were 8001., and his assets near 1,000/. In his schedule he had returned a Captain Davenport, of No. 25, University-street, as a debtor for 1531, To show that there was no such person residing in that street, the son of the opposing creditor (a youth twelve years of age) was called, who deposed that he, with his father, had inquired at every house in that street, but could find no such person. Mrd CooKE submitted that the Court could not come to a conclusion upon the case without the appearance of the Captain, or some better proof of the existence of such a debt. Mrd WOODROOFE said he could not resist the applies& tion of Ilia Learned Friend. Mr. COIDITI(2SiORCr HARRIS—I think not. Let the case stand adjourned for further evidence respecting Captain Da venport.—Adjourned sine die. WOOLWICH PETTY SESSIONS. ROBBERIES BY THE MILITARY, AND CASE OF FLOGGING. in consequence of the increase of acts of dishonesty among the soldiers stationed at the Woolwich-barracks, the officers have found it necessary to make some severe ex amples, and have also expressed their determination to pro secute any person that may be detected in purchasing regi mentals and military stores of the delinquents. In compliance with this resolution, the following case yesterday came tinder the notice of the Bench : —Campion, a constable of Woolwich ) made a return to a search-war rant which had been issued against a marine-store dealer of the name of Beasley, at the instance of Lieut.-Colonel Power, of the Royal Artillery, under the circumstances subjoined, A private in the Bth batit;L i Artillery, narked Thomas Fry, was found gu i lty,of Royal a court martial held a few days since, of having sold his kit, 11,. was sentenced to receive two hundred lashes, On Saturday morning at seven o'clock the sentence was carried into exe cution before the Royal Marines and the Artillery , who were paraded in front Of the barracks on the occasion ; and on Fry receiving the hundred and fiftieth lash, ai which time he was very much ethatistedi and appeared to suffer great bodily pain, Colonel Power offered to remit the remaining fifty lashes, if Fry would disclose the name and address of tbd party to whom he had sold his kit. This he consented to do, and he was accordingly taken down from the halberts, and conveyed to the hospital ad joining the Artillery barracks, where he stated that he sold the articles to Beasley. An application was accord ingly made to the magistrates for a warrant to search Beazley's house, which was granted, and placed in the hands of Campion, who stated to the Bench yesterday that he had made a diligent search, but could not find the arti cles in question, nor could he discover any thing that would justify any suspicion that there had been unfair dealing on the part of Beazley. The Magistrates said that under the circumstances they ,could not proceed in the case, unless additional evidence was laid before them. At the time Fry promised to confess, one of the Artillery tsclaimed--" The rascal! I'd give him a hundred more if I had my way." The expression being overhear° by Major Russell, h% communicated it to Colonel Power; who endeavoured, but in yain, to ascertain who it was tba made the remark. not It is stated that, on the recove:v of Fry, if he does - bring the receivers to justice, the remainder of his sentel3o will be carried into effect. He has beea twice before P nished for acts of dishonesty. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. ADVICES, ARRIVALS, AND DEPARTURES '- THE SCOTCH WHARFS, NOVEMBER 3. 4 , Hoßa's WHARF.—Advice : the Peterhead Shipping Car, pany's smack Peterhead Packet, William Taylor master, a rived at Peterhead the 39th ult. Arrivals : the Arbroatbsal, London Shipping Company's smack, Defiance, Peter all, master, from Arbroath, and the Peterhead Shipping Comet; ny's smack Margaret, William Begrie, master, from Peterbslu both with general cargoes. No dpartures. DowNE's WHARF.—NO advices. Arrivals : the Pe terbel a and London Shipping Company's smack Eagle, J. Criebtoa ... master, from Peterhead, and the Montrose Shipping Cos?, ny's smack Eagle, Andrew Mearns master , from Montrose l both with general careoes. Departure: the Inverness el London Shipping Company's smack Caledonia, A. Vil e master, for Inverness, with a general cargo. rro ll CARRON WHARF.—NO advices. Arrival : the mas Shipping Company's smack Panope, William Higgin from Grangemouth, with a general cargo. No departures-doo MILLER'S WHARF.—Advice : the Aberdeen and La n „, t Shipping Company's smack Bon Accord, James Ker 111° _, 1 ; e 0 arrived at Aberdeen the 30th ult. Arrivals : the AheruAie and London Shipping Company's smack Superior, John Le), master, from Aberdeen ; and the London and Edinbertch Shipping Company's smack Trusty, Henry Behren Mast from Leith, both with general cargoes, No departures. oil) ABERDEEN STEAM WHARF. Arrival : the ean 3 ; 1 , 4 1• Queen of Scotland, John Pearson commander, fro st m "". deen, with goods and passengers. , 14 LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF —No advices. Arrasa--;r1 London and Glasgow Shipping Company's steam-ship William, Andrew Richardson commander ; and the same Coo' pany's smack Abercromby, Alexander Stout master; from Leith, with general cargoes. No departures. „ LEITH AND BERWICK. WHARF.—Advices : the Lonaoen'o Leith Old Shipping Company's smack Sir William W ai A la t he J. Tulloch master, sailed from Leith the 31 st ult . ; an" LI, Berwick Shipping Company's smack Tweed, John Crow n i tt 4 ter, sailed from Berwick'the Ist intant ; both for this Arrivals : the London and Leith Old Shipping CoulPrO smack Ocean, Henry Johnson master, from Leith ; Berwick Shipping Company's smack Commerce, \lle Crow master, from Berwick ; both with general cargoes. vit a, parture : the Berwick Shipping Company's smack Ann , Liam Hildreth master, for Berwick, with a general eare' VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THE - TOM-HOUSE, Nov. 3. The Glory, and City of Hamburg, from HarnburViPo; Blossom, from Villaviciosa; Tourist, from Antwerp; "e te rs- Indian Chief, Globe, Sceptre, and Faithful, from St. r j ew„ ol , burgh ; Hampshire, from Montreal and Quebec ; Arnst,e7, a - b, from Amsterdam ; Wenskerb, from Copenhagenj "`„,"dti from Gibraltar; Dandy, from Malaga; Elise, from Nee Wiiliam Fawcett, from Gibraltar, Cadiz, and Lisbon- 3 , ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, S ol ' for The Cater, for Dunkirk ; Harlequin, and Perseversontoo. Hamburg; True Love, for Swan River; Defiance, for jpe stantinople and Odessa 2 • Dart, for Jersey ; Matilda , for cleaux ; Margaretta, for Bilboa. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, o ° ."'srio• The Williams, for Smyrna ; West Indian, for 0 ,'"„ for cent's; Astrea, and Columbine, for Hamburg • Vino; Hobart-town ; Facility, and Richard Watson, 'for L's for for Rosalind, for Ostend; Aurora, for Arendahl; Monkelf r St. Michael's; Jamaica, for Jamaica ; Sir Edward Dallk,es,.'ipi Rotterdam Harlequin, for Bouloene; Rosalind, for 1 ' dad ; Caledonia, for Barbadoes. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, n'o; Tee Resolution, for Norway ; Matbilde , for the ,P;;;0; Ace of Trumps, for St. Michael's; Orestes, for Sierra P' Allendale, for Gottenburgh. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. The William Rodger,from Bristol for Bombay on th e August, in lat. 29. 40. S., long. 48. 34. E. Blake, fr ° o 49 , N erpool for Bombay, on the 9th, in lat.. 31. 33. S. 1 ,. °14 .'„;11 1 ' 54. ;and the Heroine, from Liverpool to Calcutta , 19t h oleos' 31. 10., long. 21. 30.. by the Ranger, arrived at St. s. ARRIVALS AT LIVERPOOL, NoV. 2 ' f ,'be 4; The Alcoyne, Muer, from Quebec ; Nautilus , from by—folt• Jane, Brown, from Aricati ; Galston Guthrie, frl i b i lio s, froid ; Garryowen, Metcalf, from damerfest ; Rooss, from Jacobstadt • Minerva, Hertsbeg, from Je la g• s; Alert, from Denia ; Lamlash,' Nicholson;, from lu il, froo s Friends, Boys, from Westport ; Manchester, Owens', Bristol ; Mary Ann, Williams, from Wigton. ENTERED FOR LOADING, Nov. . p i t 2 telt The Royal Mint, Rossall, for Jamaica ; Caspian , for New York. CLEARED OUTWARDS, Nov. The Pretty Lass, Cubban, for Africa; Rapid, wi,V.,110 Leghorn ; Vigilant, Patterson, for Rio Jane iro ; leo; Houstoun, for Jamaica ; Richard Mount, Farma n, for ° pot p Cornelia, M‘Neil, for Calcutta; Louisa, Cumming, • ei Michael's; Victoria, Evans, for Savanilla; Mallakasset, for Manilla; Agenoria, from Mobile. • SAILED, Nov. 2. na ll ft7t The Donna Maria, Steel, for Oporto ; Lou isa, 3 St. John's, New Brunswick ; Fairfield, Slack, for W ai lc tre' Bellona, Simpson, for Maranham ; La Belle 5 Alliaxc e t for Antwerp ; Sunbury, Hinde, for Charleston ; -ti° l l Pr . stant, Hensel', for Antwerp ; Frederica, for Osten e 0 garet, Russell, for St. John's, New Brunswick; J.1,1010' Johnson, for Trinidad ; Enfield, Thomas, Valparaiso ; Lukkis, for Ostend. ev alef DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA.—M. de Toccin erica in his work under this title, considers the Anglo-I""tevt4 people as having made the great experiment o f atte'ti, to construct society upon a new basis. It beconles'„ e rt 3ll) fore, a curious and most important question to 0-s'4o' what has been the working of this experithent. r il ie u t, or tion he examines in its various bearings and throne °6016: pears to favour no party, nor to advocate any Pa r o ec, t , theory, but to look dispassionately and liberal l y as f e e d, P the present and future condition of the people he visi t & tlii s must, we think, be apparent to every one who r e a bee ° work, that while it is probably the very best that basgects written upon the Constitution, laws, condition and Pl v il liic h , of America, it abounds with lessons and suggest s f o d i France and England should immediately and Pr ° -= , 4 1 study."—Monthly Review. for. By a decision of the third Chamber of beefthetoe lv Court of Paris, a foreigner must be summoned 63; Tribunal of the district in which he resides, ann a b i c h i ii ' quently not before the Tribunal of the districtinvi plaintiff resides.—Boulogne Joutnal. t ot e o .11 Great quantities of fine pilchards have bv C ell O' 0 In'' at the different fishing coves on the coast or k g b b during the past fortnight. The greater part of tlhe e m; o iof been purchased at a low price for food during re the winter. ~,, i t On Saturday about fifty convicts , sentenced Su' different Circuit Courts, were embarked at Leith in William Wallace, for the hulks in the Thames. ..,,,,.° .......--..1"9- - AO' (ADVERTISEMENT.) c 5 td' SILVER WATCHES TWO GUINEA." a rtt°' An Assortment of Second-hand Watches, all of them w .4.ice , ,. and of various sizes, may be selected from, for the abovearvistA" T. Cox SAVORY'S, Working Silversmith, Goldsmith, a° o f maker, 47, Cornhill, London. p d N.B. A pamphlet, containing a detailed list of the r t i ) .' Plate, Plated Goods, Watches, Clocks, &c. m a y be hole , tll e BIRTHS. l o s bi l : e' On the 30th ult., at the Rectory , Barkstone , Line° - ...t.• , lady of the Rev. Henry Cleveland, of a daughter. On the 3d inst., in Torrington-square , the wife of ••••••- ehlries t y dith, Esq., of a daughter. ,eok On the 2d inst., in Duke-street, Westminster, Mrs. o f 6 wife of Robert Lemon, Esq., of the State Paper Officer 01, born child. , IV° On the 2d inst., in Berkeley-square , th e lady of i• theof jun., Esq., of a daughter. On the 2d inst., at Montpellier, South Lambeth, the l ad !. I v, Rev. Henry Clissold, of a daughter. f the On the Ist inst., at Bolney Lodge, Sussex, th e ladY ° oe Anthony Chester, of a daughter. Stie seS' On the Ist inst., at the Vicarage, West Tarring, lady of the Rev. J. W. Warter, of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 30th ult. at Hunstanton, Norfolk, James A rn jet% L"de' of Edinburgh, to ult., fourth daughter of Edward Fie oa nt' of Park-street, Grosvenor-square. , vote, t lie On the 27th ult., at St. Margaret's Church, Ipswien,,hter 0 Charles Bolton, R.N. to Anne Elizabeth, fourth de ll o Ole late Thomas Howard, ' Esq., of London. %.a f s tlif ' a pt, On the 22d ult., at All Saints Church, Levres, hyf. l ,, gell a . t ß e e A v. u A n: e N ld o e t s t t , da F u r g a h n t c e i r s ePfeTrc.y Johnston, Esq. of the 4 j'" oo to ~e 5, Henry Price, Esq., of Finsbury-place, Tilla rt tilYeteatee- Ann t'' w id o c of the late Ghrimes, Esq., of Lud es s oll , 00 On the 31st ult., DIED. Esq , , h. •of year. at Swansea, William Bevan, x'sq" 04 , 9 Vine House, Brompietri aged 54. Tro ll t;t 4 6 t ' f On the 20t1t of August, at Athens, John Llevielrb sob,: On the 23d ult., at Iltuges, Thomas Anthonya_..,_,o.,;,o , late Fellow - of New College, Oaford, and barrister-Rana s ! _ I P I ,Ot O On the Ist inst., in Eaton-place, Captain the , f i e A dolf'. . 0 Duncan, Xi C.l-1. and C. 8., Duncan, and brother to the present Earl of Campe r, s , o . 1., . On the Ist inst., in Delahay-street, Westminste . 0 " ' f .. 54 f Fallofield, late of Scotland-yard, aged 80. John Kiefg'_ n, , sre p On the 31st ult., Eliza, eldest daughter of ‘ ,4 S e Southampton, aged 22. Jam es _l,O , Jr On the 31st ult., at Timberden, near Dorking 150 , Esq. of th e . P On the 2d inst., J. W. Wardell, Esq., eldest sonal. 0., iorcei second son of the ia,oo.„,,tberi Wardell, Esq., of Whitburn West-house, Durha i ag ed✓ er ei o re i On the 2d inst., in Pineapple-place, Maida:.vg'ordneAutstror the third daughter of Stephen Groom, Esq.' 0 2, , genrY .a l f ~e i t' On the 3d inst., in Crutchedfriars, agedeilas an d fa an ,o , Goodhall, Esq., for upwards of 50 of of homevant o e f s t t h a e bi E ish as n t i India ent. Company., ardarthea zoldest ser v cs :: , cotojo. 11D0 109 • th e London : Printed and Published by MU-- Strand, in 112, Strand, at The Sun Office, No. 1 12, of Middlesex. .. socE NOTIC] of THIS the 19th in! CONSIGIS TMPO: and FAMILTE mode of p u t they will be distance not every expen Ist Cla 2d a Ist Cla 2d Dc Gral' s In 0 U 0 Brighto, To Dt The API NESDA N (mired after Crac: Noi wired up 6 th Noveml The SU BAN SU of the Co Lomb COM? Soutl Docks. George Itud rev i Ti ed • k erie Su Peter SOLICITC PAaLI. • The right 4113.,5ted upor that* t o a fa emitted. , APplieati c woh, on aco Pole of allot 24, Tatsai • t i AST Lond, High-st r Ilford, Rom Kelvedou tirte e of neat anc d eposit IL Sir e Rebe r ary Bo ••ahn Brot Prlderielo "...Rev. Joi n tharle! C W. C. Cra Captain T Louis Des Lord4' ° ll l Chu eati'ers--14 t ftineers_ 41 km C ....street, A ce , • Stzl held for tillat r ate g72 . u . ri( At the Galle eourt- •ari ee 11 E v NiAi lit4oore fr s.taireal ti n•, ai foidir 9i n ‘ 11 (1 a tve three dr 4 th deserif t o : t Z n a: hors be vies 11 OfTY ehM, No. nond-s Part uncle] k g the rad ar tile lateJ: