The Sun. — London, England, 1835-06-02 00:00:00

PRICES 01' STOCKS THIS Rank Stock ..«.....«.«..... 215 17 16 i per Cent. Red. .9 0%%4 3 per Cent. Cons. 91% 1 4% IP4per Cent... ............... 98% Ifitto Red. .i . 8% OW4 slew 3% per Cent ...99U1 100 99% 4 *er Cent. Assented/Dissented 'ank Long Annuities to expire Jan. 5, !060 16 9-16 % Oct. 10, 1859 16%1i Jan. 5, 1860 Jan. 5, 1880 April 5, 1880 Jan. 5. 1870 DAY AT ONE OTOLCK, New 5 per Cent - India Stock _ 258 9 Ditto Bonds 7 11 9pm. South Sea Stock ----- Old Annuities New Ditto .__. - iper Cent. Annuities, 1151... -- Exch. Bills, Xl,OOO 2O 27 pat Ditto 500 2l 27 pm. Ditto Small Ditto Commercial 23 pm . Ditto Advertised 2O 26 Pin. Bank Stock for Account ...... India Stock for Account Consols for Account y 1 % PRICES OF FOREIGN FUNDS Austrian Bonds — Belgian Bonds 99U THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. 1 Peruvian Bonds. Ditto Account Portuguese Bonds Ditto Account Brazilian Bonds Dittc. Account Buenos Ayres Bonds Ditto Account -.— Ditto New Bonds B9 8 Ditto Account B9 Prussian Bonds — Ditto 80nd5,11422 — Russian Bonds, 1821 10 8 ,4 Ditto Account — Ditto Metallic — Spanish Bonds 4Bli Ditto Account — Ditto Bonds, 1835 — Ditto Account — French, 5 per cent. —f. —c I --- 4 per cent. —l —c. 1 .--- 3 per cent. -f. -c. , --- Exchange —f. —c Dutch, 84 per cent. 55 % 3% Ditto Account 55% Ditto, 5 per cent lOO% N Ditto Account ... Ditto Account —l Chilhan Bonds 4 s, Ditto Account 18;4 Columbian Bonds — Ditto Account Columbian Bonds, :824 .36% 76 Ditto Account 37 6 Danish Bonds Ditto Account ......... ..... Greek Bonds Ditto Bonds, 1925 Ditto .Iccount Mexican Bonds, 5 per cent 27% vino Account I)it•.o, 6 per cent. 37% 7 6 Ditt' Account 37 Neapolitan PRICES OF SHARES THIS DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. Paid. Per Share, Brazilian Imperial Mining Co. (Issued at M. pm ) 2n Ditto Macatibas Comes 2O Ditto St. John del Rey Real del lklonte Mining Co., Registered If!. 6,1 18 174, Ditto Unregistered — United Mexican (issued at 2[. pm.) Alliance Assurance Company lO Provincial Bank of Ireland 25 ____ 2443 11k, 47% (VA HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. Morning .36 minutes after 6. f Evening 3 minutes a f ter 7 THEATRE ROYAL, DRURY-LANE. THIS EVENING will be performed the New Comedy, entitled PATRICIAN AND PARVENU, A new Steurish National Song, with Echo, by MM. Reich, Rom, Kraus, and Kaln. After which, POPPING THE QUESTION. " Die walerieh Lust reuse in de: Sweitz," by MM. Reich, Rosan, Kras, and Kahl. To conclude with SECRET SERVICE. To-morrow there will be no performance. THEATRE ROYAL, COVENT-GARDEN. THIS EVENING will be performed Auber's Opera of LESTOCQ ; OR, THE FETE OF THE HERMITAGE. Lestocq, Mr. K Seguin; Count Golonin, Mr. Giubilei ; Dirnitri Mr. Templeton. The Princess Eliaalyztli, Miss Shirreff. After which, AULD ROBIN GRAY. To conclude with THE HUNTER OF THE ALPS. HAMBURG, MAY 1535. HEINE BROTHERS, CONTRACTORS for the STATE of HAMBURG'S GREAT LOTTERIES. being requested to publish the Scheme of the approaching - Sixty sixth Lottery in the English Papers, and to have Tickets on Safe, with Agents in England, beg to state that neither can be done, because it is illegal for the English Newspapers to publish Foreign Lottery Schemes, and for aty Agents in England to sell Foreign Lottery Tickets. On the other hand, they beg to state. as it i; NOT Illegal for any person in England to PURCHASE Foreign Lottery Tickets, that any person desirous to purchase, on addressing them by mail, will receive a full Scheme, and any desirable infor- Illation on the subject (Gratis), by return of post. • HAMBURG, MAI - , IS-15. EINE BROTHERS 1,2 g to inform all tilos( who have to remit to them Eight. Pounds., that upon receip of a Ten Pound note, Two Pounds will be returned in gold by re. turn cf HAMBURG, MAY, 1.i3:. lIEINE BROTHERS bog to state that a Ticket , of the Sixty-sixth Han:burg Great Lottery, ersts, at the first price, Eight Pounds. -- The pubaeration Uf TIIE SUN NEWSPAPER commenced this (14. at 7 minutos Fast o'cLck. • < -7; ; , r( LO I)ON, TUESDAY EVENING. JUNE 2, 1835. The great question of the Ballot—the subject of so many Parliamentary pledges and hustings harangues— stands prominently forth amongst the measures to be brought before the House of Commons this eveninf. As this question involves the principle of the purity of Election, without which the Reform Bill must ever remain a dead letter, we call upon Ministers not to disappoint the just expectations of their best friends, by moving its postponement, under the pretence of an expediency, which will be regarded out of doors as a dereliction of public duty. The Reformers of Great Britain are by far too intelligent to be persuaded that the question of the Ballot ought to give way to a discus sion on a local Bill, or a debate on distresses, agricul- tural or commercial. They know that the free exer cise of the elective franchise forms the basis of the British Constitution ; and they are now convinced, by the experience of three centuries, that purity of elec tion cannot be secured in England without the Ballot. We are aware that, among the more moderate Whigs, there are some who object to the Ballot as un-English--as compromising the dignified indepen dence of British freemen, and a great deal more in the same hyperbolical strain. To this our answer is very short. Real independence consists in freedom of ac tion, no:-. in the notoriety that may attend it. The object of the elective franchise is to secure freedom to the elector ; a lofty bearing is a mere accident of it— the same as colour to a piece of painted wood. So long as the act of voting is the same, and its conse quences the same, the manner of its performance increases the value of the principle in propor tion as it secures greater irresponsibility of action. But this objection, after all, is a mere assumption. Were it a fact, the Ballot would be unnecessary. But it is because British freemen are compelled, in self defence, to sacrifice their conscience to the interests of themselves and families, that the Ballot becomes ne cessary to guarantee the free and irresponsible exercise of the elective franchise. The Ballot takes away no right—infringes upon no privilege. It neither binds the tongue, nor ties up the right arm of the voter. If the elector feel that he is independent, or if he d&- sire to brave the vengeance of an ousted candidate, he is free to proclaim his votes past, present, and fu ture—and as this will be a matter of choice with him self, it must be taken as the test of a greater freedom of action, than a compulsory publicity attendant on the mere act of voting, which is the case now. But if voting by Ballot be un-English—if it betray the presence of fear and subserviency—why is the onus of supporting the national character exclusively placed on the shoulders of those whose only protection against oppression is the right of exercising the elective fran chise ? There must be some mistake here. Were secret voting derogatory to individual or national cha racter, it would not prevail in Aristocratic clubs, in Parliamentary Committees, and in the appointment of Bank and East India Directors. Peers of the Realm, Members of the House of Commons, Merchants, and Money-dealers, must be presumed as much the guardians of the national independence of Gre-at Britain as 101. householders qualified to vote at a general election. There is surely less occasion to defend the strong against the strong, than to protect the weak against the influential and the powerful. If the Peer finds the use of a black ball necessary to protect him from the vengeance of an excluded club-candidate, neither so powerful nor so respected as himself, there surely can be nothing un becoming the dignity of the State in covering the pea sant with his Lordship's invisible lEgis, when about to be exposed to the wrath of a person who can crush him with a word? In Parliamentary Committees, in clubs, in banking establishments, and in the India House, the several members are, from their rank in so ,ciety, raised beyond the reach of individual rancour ; and besides, their education and acquaintance with the laws, afford them ample facilities of protecting themselves ; but the case is very different when the parti:is in opposition are a landlord and his tenantrv at-will. The latter have no protection from the IaNNTs, neither alv they able to protect themselves. Perhaps it will be said that the landed Aristocracy never interfere with the freedom of election. To those who make this assertion we have nothing to reply. Facts can have no weight with them, and arguments are above their comprehension. They are alike igno rant of the history of past, and the occurrence of pre sent events. And yet they may understand us if we ask—Why, then, is the ballot resorted to in club rooms ? or, why is a fictitious protection claimed by peers, which is denied to peasants ? If it be necessary in the one case, it must be much more so in the other ; if it be unnecessary in both, its general adop tion must he a matter of the most perfect indifference to the hereditary Legislature. The landed Aristocracy imitate the instinctive sa gacity of the ostriches of the desert in effecting the concealment of their designs. If the head is hidden, they forget the exposure of the body. Like children, who hide themselves by covering their eyes, they arc foolish enough to be persuaded that because they have succeeded in blinding themselves to the conse quences of their own conduct, their real motives are therefore invisible to all the rest of the world. But it is time to divest them of this delusion. The electors of Great Britain are fully aware of the motives which induce the rich and the powerful to sanction secret voting among themselves, and at the same time leave to the humble and the dependant the glory of maintaining the national honour by voting openly, and in the teeth of all but absolute power. The gilded pill has been swallowed so often, and its effects have been so uniformly injurious to the constitution, that the sight of it produces loathing. Henceforth the pea santry will be content to follow the example of " their natural protectors " as the landed aristocracy complai santly style themselves. They have lost all ambition for alnotoriety which is either followed by individual ruin, or national oppression. They will be satisfied with the internal consciousness of doing their duty—of securing the liberties of their country—more espe cially as after the establishment of the system of voting by ballot, bribery, perjury, and the corrup- on attendant on the election of Members of Par liament will be rooted out of England. Whatever eradicates these foul stains from the national character must accord with the genius of the British people. We shall not lose sight of those Members of the House of Commons who stand pledged to their consti tuents to support the Ballot. They have now an opportunity of redeeming their pledge on this ques tion ; and we trust that we shall not be called upon to class theM among the absentees, should a division take place. We have small sympathy with Parlia mentary invalids, and assuredly we shall not extend to those pseudo-liberals who decline to record their votes on the Ballot. In particular we shall expee that those Members who cry out against the dcsecra tion of the Sabbath from purely religious motives, tai; come forward to protect the conscience of the poor man from the influence of bribery and intimidation. If is be meritorious in the sight of GOD to protect the Sabbath, it must be still more meritorious to protect the people against compulsory perjury, or inevitable uin. The Meeting of the Birmingham Political Union, which took place yesterday, is a handsome :,:lswer to the Conservative cry of re-action. Though Reformers of all grades and classes were present, yet but one spirit predominated, ns.melv, that of unhesitating con fidence in Ministers. To so great an extent did this spirit prevail, that the Meeting expressly recommendcd in one of their leading resolutions, that " the redress of grievances be so sought, as not to aid the intrigues of enemies, or embarrass tried and faithful friends." What will the Conservative's say to this ? Can they point to any similar resolution ever made in their favour, by such a vast body of people, as composed the Meeting in question ? Not they. The utmost they can do, is to point to the few hole-and-corner addresses which were got up, for interested purposes, to confirm Sir R. PEEL in his adherence to the Tamworth Ma nifesto. The subjects discussed at the Birmingham Meeting were first, Corporation Reform ; secondly, the Irish Church question ; and thirdly, the Grievances of the Dissenters. Now, on all these topics, though there was but one opinion as to the pressing necessity for their promptest consideration, yet it was unanimously re solved that they could not be left in better hands than in those of Ministers, who were bound, both by prin ciple and inclination, to do them every justice. When the Conservatives last succeeded to power, we do not remember that Birmingham accorded them a vote of confidence like this. Notwithstanding they too professed Reform, not a Reformer stirred . in their favour. All was doubt and anxiety on the part of their friends—despair on the part of their ene mies ; but no sooner have they quitted the helm, than the dormant spirit of the people revives, and public Meetings—not packed, hole-and-corner Meetings, where the Chairman presides with the key of the door in his pocket---.are held in all quarters of the country to thank the KING for the dismissal of his late, and the restoration of his present, Ministers. But by far the most important of these Meetings is the one that has just taken place at Birmingham. In point of intelligence—of numbers—of legitimate popular in fluence—it is worth all the Conservative Associations that have been manufactured since November last. In the latter, we hear only the voice of a party. In the former a people speak out. It was Birmingham that originated the popular cry for the Reform Bill ; and it will be the same Midland Metropolis that by the irresistible force of its example, will ring the death knell of the Conservatives. We are glad to see that in the zeal of their discussion on the Irish Church and Corporation matters, the Birmingham Reformers did not lose sight of the great question of Registration. One of their resolutions was to the effect, that " this meeting, impressed with the importance of being at all times prepared for a general election, strongly urge upon the Reformers throughout the kingdom the necessity of a strict attention to the approaching Registration." Electors of the United Kingdom, pay attention to this advice 1 Those who have offered it you, know well its value—know well that though the victory of Reform can only be decided in St. Stephen's, yet that the first blow must be struck in the Registration Courts. Register yourselves then at the first fitting opportunity. Get up Meetings throughout the country, for the purpose of impressing this caution on the people. If you hesitate—if you defer 'till to-morrow what could be done to-day—you will not only paralyze the exertions of your friends, but furnish your enemies with ten-fold powers of an noyance. Show but as much zeal—as much subtlety —as much unanimity—in the cause of Reform, as the Conservatives are hourly showing in the cause of into lerance, and from that moment the victory is your's. You cannot expect that Ministers—no matter how well disposed—will toil all day in the vineyard, if you content yourselves with creeping lazily in at the eleventh hour. No, no. Turn and turn-about is fair play. If they work, so must you. If they agree to encounter difficulties, so must you. Each must help the other, in fair and just proportion. The motion which Mr. CAYLEY insisted so perti naciously in obtruding upon the House of Commons last night, to the prejudice of the great question of Corporation Reform, was rejected by a majority of 90, the numbers on the division being 216 to 126. Though the advocates for a depreciation of the currency THE SUN, LONDON, TURSDA Y, JUNE 2, 1835. joined the clamourers for agricultural relief, on ) this occasion, the objects of the confederacy were signally defeated. At this we heartily rejoice. We can conceive nothing more mischievous --nothing more calculated to sap the very foundations of national prosperity—than Mr. CAYLET's project of tampering with the currency. Whether Sir ROBERT PEEL'S Bill, passed in 1819 was a prudent measure or not, is not now the question. That it produced a greater mass of individual suffering than any financial measure ever adopted by the Legislature, we are thoroughly persuaded ; and we suspect, that had its real effects, its actual working, been foreseen, it never would have passed. But to attempt now to undo the evil then done by an opposite measure, would be the maddest and the most cruel attempt that ever was made. Instead of compensating the former sufferers, which is the only plea that can be brought forward for it, it would infallibly create an equal, if not a greater amount of new suffering, and in numbers of cases the same parties would suffer twice. As to any relief which the depreciation of the currency, by whatever means accomplished, would afford to the agriculturist, no hope can be entertained by any ra tional person. And here is the great point in esta blishing which the currency people have so completely failed. They attribute the low price of wheat to an en hanced currency, and they say relieve us, "by debasing the currency." But how have they accounted for the ano malous and unprecedented fact that one commodity alone has fallen, if the cause be one which equally affects all commodities. Upon this they are silent—and for the best of all reasons—because they have nothing to say. The public debt, they cry, is rendered heavier by the effect of PEEL'S Bill. Be it so ; but how does that affect the agriculturists in particular ? Do not the other classes feel this burden equally with them, and, in deed in a greater degree? inasmuch as the agriculturist makes no direct contribution to the revenue. His indirect contributions would be increased by the pro posed alteration in the currency. The real cause of the low price of wheat is, as we said in a former arti - cle, an increased supply, and while this supply conti nues, it is utterly in vain to attempt to raise the price by legislative enactments. It would be as rational to make laws for regulating the winds and the waves. We have received the whole of the Paris Papers of Sunday, which furnish a report of the proceedings in the Chamber of Peers on Saturday, with regard to the Advocates accused of signing the letter addressed to the prisoners of April. The cool effrontery of the Chamber in negativing, with all the listlessness imagin able, every objection raised against its competency—lts declaration of the inseparability of its legislative and judicial functions—its assumption of - inquisi torial power by compelling the accused to give evilnice against themselves—its contempt for the esta blished laws, and the articles of the Charter—ore the subjects of bitter invective in the columns of all the Liberal,Journals. By the laws passed for regulating the public press of Feance, the registered Editor is alone responsible for what appears in the columns of a paper, unless where lie consents to give up the actual writer, and appears as a witness against him. The sig naiure of any other name to a libellous article affects not the question of responsibility, as the party whose name is affixed to the objectionable document is presumed to have acted under the sanction of the principal Editor —or that at least L:1; 3 la';:cr 11:17_ , voluntarily chosen to incur those penalties which he is previously aware the law may impose upon him. This law the Peers hove trampled upon, in order to gratify their appetite for revenge. They not only seize the Editors of the • journals in which the letter addressed to the prisoners appear, but they order ninety other individua!s to be dragged before them, and without a shadow of evidence, command them under penalty of impri sonment for contempt, to become their own prosecu tors. This infamous proceeding was warmly resented by several of the Advocates. The following extract from the Report will show the nature of the spirit which the despotism of the Peers is conjuring up among the educated classes in every part of France:. M. de Vielblanc, a barrister of the Cour Royale of Paris, said that it was principle of criminal law that no accused individual could either injure or justify himself by his own declaration. If, therefore, he were to answer affirmatively to the questions of the President, he could not, on the principle above mentioned, be con . demned, and still less were he to answer negatively. The President—Answer in precise terms, whether you have pub lished or signed the letter? M. Gervais, physician, of Caen, when his name was called, ob served, that the present trial was an episode of the forty years' war, engaged between the monarchy and the republic, and which would terminate in the complete overthrow of the monarchical principle. The President—Beware of aggravating your position by intem perate language. M. Gervais, in continuation, protested against any interpretation of his words. After commenting on the irregularities with which, in his opinion, the trial of the political prisoners had hitherto been attended, he said that he was now in presence not of his judges but of his political enemies, and that the form of question addressed to the accused parties was a snare to entrap them, to induce them to avow their concurrence in the sentiments expressed in the incul pated letter. Peers, continued M. Gervais, venture to ask my opinion of yourselves, and I will declare it frankly, and without disguise.—With regard to the material fact of the signature to the letter, I reply that I have neither signed nor published it. If you demand whether I have authorised its publication, I reply in the words of my friend M. Raspail— , . You make laws for the press, and you are ignorant of those laws. The Gerat of a journal is the only individual whom your laws recognise as the publisher." M. Demay, on being interrogated, replied that he was an officer cashiered for his opposition to the principle of passive obedience. He declared that he would never consent to become gaolor, the exe cutioner. or the assassin of his fellow-citizens.—( Whilst pronoun cing the latter phrase, M. Demay looked stedfastly and pointedly towards the gallery reserved for the accommodation of the military officers now on duty.) The President—Your language is an incitement to mutiny and insubordination. M. Demay denied the intention imputed to him by the Presi dent, and terminated by saying that he had neither signed nor pub lished the inculpated letter. The name of the Abbe de la Mennais . having been called, strong marks of curiosity and interest were exhibited amongst the audi tory. The Abbe, on being questioned as to his imputed signature, replied, that were he before a tribunal whose members were not invested with the twofold character of accusers and judges, he might judge it expedient to address that tribunal at some length. As it was, he would only observe, that the events now passing should be lost neither upon France nor upon Europe. He solemnly pledged himself to that effect.—(Great agitation.) It now only remained for him to declare, that he had neither signed nor pub lished the letter to which his name had been affixed. jects. If it be borne in mind that the above is the language of men who have been guilty of no criminal act what ever,--who were not consenting parties to the publi cation of the letter—there can be no mistake as to the state of public feeling in France. After re peated secret consultations, their Lordships pro nounced that all those who had declared themselves innocent of signing or publishing the letter should be excused from further attendance ; the Chamber, in the plentitude of its mercy, assuming them guiltless. With respect to those who had either refused to answer the questions put to them by the President, or had in their answers contemned the inviolability of their Lord ships' tribunal, the Court declared that it would sit in judgment upon them the next day (Sunday 1) when its decision would be made known. At twelve o'clock on Sunday the Court opened, and the accused were intro duced, but as the mails leave Paris on Sunday at two o'clock, we have not yet received the report of the pro ceedings. We envy not their Lordships the reflections underfoot the g the MAJESTY jinEstThyusetfrHamEpAlivEN, in vindicat ing highwhie which th behests ey of mustth the honour of the tools of his Majesty of FRANCE. With all their contempt for law, and justice, and moral right, under whatever name it may be called, they cannot but feel, as they enter upon a solemn de secration of the Sabbath, how monstrous is their guilt compared with the silly offence which they seek to punish. A breach of the law of God is of no moment when it hastens the gratification of the vindictive feelings of the French Peerage. Heaven is solemnly and deliberately insulted—a perni cious example is set to thirty millions of people, to ac celerate by a few hours a Peer's thirst for vengeance. A Monarchy so supported cannot be of long duration. On Saturday Lord GRANVILLE had an audience of Louis PHILIPPE, when he presented his cre dentials as Ambassador from his Britannic MAJESTY to the French Court. The KING received his Lord ship very graciously, and, after the usual compliments had passed, successively presented him to the QUEEN, and the Dukes of ORLEANS and NEMOURS. Lord GRANVILLE was accompanied by his attaches. The question of foreign intervention in the affairs of Spain continues to be discussed in the Paris papers. The following are extracts from the journals received this morning : PARIS, MAY 30.—1 t seems that the Report on the American Treaty will be presented very shortly to the Chamber of Peers. The Committee in which the Marquis de Jaucourt presided yester day heard M. Routhier on all the questions relative to the immense fortune left by Philip Francois Renaut, formerly Director-General of the Mines of Louisiana, to which he has a right, together with other co-heirs. PARIS, MAY 31.—The Impartial says—" If we are well in formed, this great political measure is definitively resolved upon, and has obtained the assent of the whole Cabinet . " It is announced that two couriers had been despatched yester day and to-day, one to find out Sebastiani at London, the other to the Cabinet of Madrid. " The courier to Spain is also the bearer of despatches to General Harispe, commanding the Army of Observation of the Pyrenees." On the 21st of this month, General Valdez occupied Scensol and Torres, with a column of 10,000 men and 600 horses. These two places are six leagues from Estella, on the road to Logrono. The army of Valdez has lately been augmented by 10,000 men, and 600 horses for the army of reserve of Castile and Vittoria. Es-. partero's column of 4,000 men and 200 horses is ordered to join the main body of the army. General Valdez has now on the line of the Ebro to Navarre, that is to say, from Lerin to Logrono, a dis tance of about ten leagues, 32,000 men, 2,400 horses, and 12 pieces of artillery.—Election. A letter from Bayonne of the 26th of May, has the following passage :—" No doubt is entertained here of the intervention of the French in Spain, and it cannot fail to take place soon. General Harispe has just ordered all the officers to purchase immediately wish the horses which they require to take the field.—Messager, May 31. German papers of the latest dates have been re ceived. Accounts from Naples to the. 12th of May state, that Mount Etna begins to be the subject of much speculation, and that an eruption is shortly ex pected. M. VAN DUSCH, Minister of the Grand Duke of BADEN, has published a long note addressed to one of the Swiss Cantons, dated the 18th ult., complaining of the recent conduct of the Helvetian Government, in affording protection to the enemies of other States. The chief complaint of the Government of Baden is directed against the licen tiousness of the Swiss Press, which, it appears, is capable of creating considerable uneasiness in the centre of the neighbouring States. For this evil we confess we know no remedy, unless the Grand Duke of BADEN choose to harmonize the institutions of he country in accordance with the wishes of his sub- The Press is only dangerous where the people are in a state of slavery, with just feeling enough left :o be sensible of their moral and political degradation. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF COMMONS. NOTICES OF MOTIONS FOR THIS DAY. 1. Mr. Grote,—That the Votes at Elections for Members of Parliament. be taken by way of Ballot. 2. Mr. Buckin,,ham,—Bill for authorizing the constitution of Courts of Honour, as tribunals for the adjudication o those dispuies now commonly decided by an appeal to arms; with a view to provide a competent substitute for the absurd, mur derous, and unchristian practice of duelling. 3. Mr. Pease,—Select Committee to inquire into the nature of ac- cidents in mines. 4. Mr. Divett,—Resolutions for the complete Extinction 01 Church Rates throughout England and Wales. 5, Mr. Cutlar Fergusson,—Petition from the East India Company, praying for a reduction of Duties ,on East India Sugar mil Other articles. 6. Lord Viscount Morpeth,—Bill for continuing the Act for the regulation of the Linen and Hempen Manufactures in Ireland. 7. Mc. Siniair,—Bill; to enable the Inhabitants of Burghs of Ba- rony in Scotland, to elect their own Magistrates. 8. Mr. Hume,—Return of Compensations to Attorneys of the Court of Exchequer. 9. Mr. Browne,—Select Committee, to inquire into the praetica 6,iity nan:igabl- Ca Westport, Ballina, and Castlebar. 10. Mr. Fowell Buxton,—Committee to inquire into the conduct, concliticn, andkreatment of the apprenticed Negroes in the Cc.lonies. ORDERS OF THE DAY FOR THIS DAY. 1. 11:onmouth Election Petition—Ballot for Committee at three. 2. Limerick Election Petition—Ditto at a quarter after three. 3. Foreign Enlistment Repeal Bill—Committee. 4. 'Merchant Seamen Bill—Third reading. 5. Animal Indemnity Bill—Report. O. Consolidated Fund Bill—Committee. 7. Manure Toll Exemption Bill—Committee. 8. Isle of Man Trade in Corn.—Report thereupon. NOTICES OF MOTIONS GIVEN LAST NIGHT. FRIDAY, JUNE 5. Lord John Russell—Bill for the better regulation of llunleiral Corporations in England and Wales. TUESDAY, JUNE 16, _ _ _ 1. Mr. Hesketh Fleetwood,—Select Committee regarding his Ma jesty's Consuls resident in Foreign States. 2. Air. Henry Lytton Bulwer,—Amendment on Mr. Fleetwood's motion, that the Committee be on the Consular and Diploma tic Departments. 6 21 THURSDAY, JULY 2. Mr. Sharman Crawford,—Bill to amend the Law of Landlord and Tenant in Ireland. TUESDAY, JULY 7. _ . Mr. Wilks,—For the consideration and redress of the practica' Grievances of Protestant Dissenters. THE FUNDS.-(THIS DAY.) CITY, TWELVE O'CLOCK. It appears that more confidence was experienced yesterday in the Foreign Market than for several days past, and business was done in the various Foreign Securities. Several accounts were settled, and some of the differences were paid in full, while others were arranged to be paid by instalments at different periods ; but few out of the house accounts have as yet been settled, as some of the brokers have gone to Liverpool, and others took flight to the country. It is stated that if the out-of-the-House Gentlemen do not lome forward soor and adjust their differences, in some way or other, their names will be posted up on the Royal Exchange. We believ a this measure will have some good effect. The same kind of operations are continuing this morning in the Foreign House as yesterday, making up accounts with little or no business doing. At present the only confidence in speculating is in the British funds. Consols, which left off yesterday at 91* for Money, and 91* to for the Account, opened this morning at 91i a for Money, and 91* for the Account. The following are the prices in the Foreign Market this morn ng :—Belgian, 99* 100 ; Brazilian, 82i 83 ; Chilian, 48 50 ; Co lombian, 36} 37k; Mexican, 36* 37* ; Spanish Bonds, 48 49 ; Spanish Scrip, 61 s*, discount ; Portuguese, 88* 84, ex-dividend ; and Three per Cents., 61 62, Our only arrival this morning is one French mail, with the Ex press from Paris. We have no ship letters. The French Funds were done at Tortoni's at 79f. 10c. higher than the last price. HALF-PAST ONE. Consols continue steady, and may at present be quoted 91i for the Account, and 91i for Money. Exchequer Bills have improved to 27 ; India Bonds 9 11 ; Bank Stock 216 ; India 25ts 9. The Foreign Market at present is at a complete stand still, no business of any description doing. Belgian 99i 100 ; Brazilian 82 83 ; Chilian 48 50; Colombian 36 37 ; Danish 76* 4 ; Dutch 5 per Cent. 1001 4 ; 2i per Cent. 551 ; Spanish 48i ; Spanish Scrip 6i 6 dis. ; Portuguese 88 9 ex. div. THREE O'CLOCK Consols for the Account, 911. A Bill has been introduced into the House Commons, by Mr. Ewart, limiting the time for taking the pol at contested elections to •ne day. TIMBER DUTIES.—On tile motion of Mr. Poulet Thomson, in the House of Commons last night, a Select Corn. rnittee was appointed to consider the Duties on Timber, con. sisting of the following Members : Thomson ' C. I'. Strutt, Edward Peel, Sir R i Herries, J. C. Rice, T.. 16. Roebuck, J. A. Labouchere, H. Young, G. F. Graham, Sir J. Oswald, J. Robinson, G. R. Vyvyan, Sir R. Hutt, W. Warburton, H. Lowther. Viscount Chapman, A. Ewart, W. Ord, W. Grote, G. Bannerman, A. Thompson, W. Lord Lichfield was yesterday swot sion-house by the Lord Mayor as Postmas Hawes, B. Mackenzie, J. A. S. Hawkins, J. H. Baring, W. B. Stewart, P. M. Callaghan, D. Talk, Charles A. Walker, C. A. O'Brien, W. Smith Smith, R. Vernon Ingham, R. .n in at the Man, ter-General. Captain Kirwan is a candidate for the office of Master of the Ceremonies at Cheltenham. HACKNEY REFORM AND REGISTRATION SO CIETY.—A Society under this designation, was formed on Monday evening, June 1. At a meeting of the United Re formers of Hackney, John Simpson, Esq., of St. Thomas's square, in the Chair, various resolutions were moved by the Rev. Dr. J. P. Smith, the Rev. R. Aspland, and Messrs. Adamson, F. Cooper, J. Graham, Wansey, Hunter, and others, which were carried unanimously. A Committee, con sisting of 20 gentlemen, including those above named, was chosen, and Mr. Simpson was appointed Chairman, and Mr. Stnallfield Honorary Secretary for the year. The objects of the Society, which the Committee are instructed to carry into immediate effect, are to give information and advice to voters in the ensuing Registration for the Borough of the Tower Hamlets and the County of Middlesex. Further ends contemplated by this Society are to prevent or expose the inti midation of voters, and the exercise of corrupt influence over them, and to secure the return of honest and zealous Reformers for both the Borough and the County at the next election. Considerable progress was made yesterday in the settlement of the Foreign Stock Account, many persons out of the House, who were supposed to be defaulters, having come forward with the payment of their differences, and thus restored means and credit to those members of the SO* Exchange through whom their business was transacted. PARLIAMENTARY SUMMARY, In the LORDS last night Baron HATIIERTON (Mr. Littleton) took the oaths and his seat. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY asked several questions respecting the instructions sent out to his Majesty's cruisers off the north coast of Spain and amongst others whether arms and stores had been furnished by this country to the Government of Spain? Lord MELBOURNE answered " that no such instructions as those alluded to had been sent out." The Bishop of LONDON presented a petition from 1,734 inhabitants of Islington in favour of the Islington Market Bill. Lord LYNDHURST laid on the table a Bill for the purpose of rendering those marriages legal which were contracted by parties within certain of the limits of affinity ; the Bill proposed that a marriage within such limits, if not disputed after a lapse of two years from solemnization, should be considered legal, and the offspring, if any, legitimate. Lord BROUGHAM wished the restrospective clause to attach from this instant, and was favourable to a more comprehensive measure. Lord LYNDHURST was willing to adopt the sugges tion of the Noble and Learned Lord. The Bishop of EXET ER doubted the policy of the Bill, particularly in reference to marriages contracted abroad. The Bill was then ordered to be read a first time. In the COMMONS, several petitions were presented for and against any grant to the Scotch Church. Mr. WILKS pre sented a petition similar to the one presented in the other House a few nights since by Lord BROUGHAM, from the Dis senters residing within twelve miles of the Metropolis, against Church-rates. The Hon. Member, in supporting his petition, alluded to the triumphant procession which last week accom panied Mr. Childs, of Bungay, on his liberation, as a strong proof of the existing spirit of resistance to these obnoxious rates. The case of the Wolverhampton riots was brought be fore the House by Mr. THORNELEY, who said that nothing would satisfy the country but the fullest and most impartial examina tion into the whole transaction ; and he asked whether it was the intention of Lord John Russell to send down some confi dential agent to Wolverhampton, to investigate the matter. The Noble Lord promised the fullest investigation into the cir cumstances of the riot. Lord JOHN RUSSELL postponed till Friday his motion for leave to bring in a measure of Corporate Reform. Lord MORPETH intimated that on Monday se'nnight he would introduce a measure respecting the Irish Church. Mr. CAYLEY brought forward, pursuant to notice, his motion for a Select Committee on Agricultural Distress. After a discussion, for which we efer to our Parliamentary Report, the motion was negatived by a majority of 90. Mr. DIVETT ob tained leave to bring in a Bill for the Disfranchisement of the Borough of Stafford. The orders of the day were then dis posed of, and the House adjourned at two o'clock. BIRMINGHAM.-(YESTERDAY.) GREAT PUBLIC MEETING. Yesterday, a public meeting, convened by requisition to the High Bailiff, signed by several hundreds of the most respect able inhabitants, was held in the Town Hall, for the purpose of taking into consideration the propriety of addressing his Majesty's Ministers, and the two Houses of Parliament, on the important questions which at present agitate the public mind, and especially on the recent change in his Majesty's Councils ; on the subjects of Church and Corporation Reform, and the grievances under which many of his Majesty's subjects still labour on account of their religious belief. The meeting was called for eleven o'clock, at which hour there were about 4,000 persons present. At half-past eleven, Paul Moon James, Esq., the High Bailiff, accompanied by Thomas Findale, Esq., the Low Bailiff, entered the organ gallery, and were loudly cheered. Amongst those present on the right of the Chairman, were the Revs. John Kentish and A. Bache, Unitarian Ministers, and J. Michael Donnell, Catholic Priest, Williams Wills, Esq., William Redfern, Esq., Thos. Clarke, Esq., Wm. Beal, Esq., late Low Bailiff, John Beal, Esq., Frederick Wills, Esq., Thomas Ryland, Esq., Clement Scholefield, Esq. On the left were G. F. Muntz, Esq., William Barlow, Esq., William Boultbee, Esq., and several others. The Hioii BAILIFF read the Requisition after which he spoke to the following effect :—Whatever proceedings might spring out of that meeting, he hoped they would lose nothing of their force or efficacy from the st.ict impartiality which would be observed towards all present, and from the patience and good feeling which would govern the whole of the pro ceedings. It was his duty, as Chairman, to insure for all a fair and impartial hearing ; that he would do, as far as pos sible ; but without their co-operation his endeavours would be ineffectual.—( Cheers. ) The Low BAILIFF then addressed the meeting. It was highly gratifying to him to see so numerous and highly re spectable a meeting as the present, convened to discuss the important subjects contained in the requisition. He would not then enter upon those topics, knowing that they would Le considered with so much more ability by Mr. Muntz and others, who were competent to enter fully upon them. He would merely say he had full confidence in his Majesty's Minis ters—that they would not only carry on the great principles of Reform now under consideration, and, by so doing, satisfy the people upon those points, but that they would eventually • • • •'• changes as would lead to the general prosperity and happiness of the nation.—(Cheers.) He begged leave to propose the first resolution. G. F. MUNTZ now presented himself, and was received with great cheering, which lasted for some time. He most cordially seconded the resolution. The question was— Why they should support his Majesty's Ministers on the pre sent occasion? The reason was very simple—because they could not but see very clearly that there was a deter mination on the part of the enemies of the people to pre vent them from carrying those measures of reform which were necessary, and to carry which they were returned to office by the Representatives of the empire.—( Cheers.) They had met some time since in that Hall to return men to Parliament for the purpose of carrying out the Reform Bill. Those gentlemen whom they had returned--(Cheers)—and the other Representatives of the people, had resolved on doing so, and the result was, that the present Ministry, as the most likely to effect that object, were now in power.—(Cheers.) One of the consequences of the Reform Bill was a strong and just desire on the part of the people to effect a reform in the Irish Church.—( Loud and continued cheering.) It was a notorious fact that a great proportion of the tithes collected in that country were taken from those who did not belong to the Established Church, and who consequently could not be supposed to derive any benefit or advantage from it. Men without any congregations received the Church property in Ireland, than which he could not well suppose a more unjust, and, between man and man, a more untenable system.—(Loud cheers.) The Tories had pro posed (knowing they could not retain things as they were) to dispose of the surplus revenue, but they wished to apply it exclusively to the education of Protestants. Now what relief would this be to the Catholic? What did it matter to the Catholic how it was applied, if his child were not to receive benefit from it ? The present Government, however, took a different view of it. They wanted to educate all classes, well knowing that upon the education of a people depended their real and solid happiness.—( Loud cheers.) This was the real difference between the late and the present Govern ments. The late Ministers wished to confine their education ; if compelled to educate at all, to give it to a favoured few ; whilst the present Ministers wish to educate and instruct all, without distinction of creed or party.---( Cheers.) Upon this question the late Government went out, and upon the carrying of this great, and he would unhesitatingly say, national and god-like principle, the present Government rests its claims to the support of the people.--( Cheers, and cries of " They have it.") The Tories in the House of Commons called the means used by the representatives of the people to carry out this principle factious. Was there ever such an unfounded accusation ? What was the Reform Bill carried for if not to enable the people to send men to Parliament who could and would legislate according to their wishes ? And was it not the wish of the people, not only of Ireland but of England, that the Irish Church should be reformed of its abuses, and that the people of that country should also be educated 2 ( Great cheering.) It appeared, however, they had got into a new era. It was deemed factious now-a-days for Members of Parliament to express the opinions and wishes of their constituents ; and lest the Tory Members in the House who made these charges of factious opposition against the people's Representatives should be supposed to say that which was untrue, it was endeavoured by their friends out of doors to get up what was called a re-action, or an ex pression of public opinion, as it was termed.--(Laughter.) To aid and assist in this good work, it appeared, a Con servative meeting was called in Birmingham, and an address was got up upon the subject. Was there ever such a farce? The people of Birmingham sign an address against those principles, to obtain which they spent years of toil and labour ?---( Cheers, arid cries of" And will again, if necessary.") No, it was not the people who sent up the Address. It was a few gentlemen of the town, not the people. But it was said that the document was signed by Merchants, Bankers, &c., and when he heard all this, he had the curiosity to go to Dee's Hotel to see the list. Now, all he would say about the list was this, that he was quite sure it did not contain the names of all the Bankers, Merchants, and Traders of Birmingham.-- ( Cheers.) As he had said before, it was a farce, and not worth noticing, only to say it was not such as the country might think it to be, if not contradicted.—( Hear.) Yet he did not believe the people of England would or could for a moment imagine that such a document emanated from the men of Birmingham.—( Cheers.) The Tory address, when he saw it, had got three leaves of foolscap paper attached to, and he hoped he would not again be told that it had all the rank and wealth of the town attached to it. He did not wish to deduct from any man's merits, or from the united merits of the gentlemen who had signed it, but he denied, most unequi vocally, that it contained anything like that importance which would justify Ministers, situate as the present were, in regulating their conduct by it.---( Loud and continued cheers.) No : the present Ministers, if they knew anything, must know better._( Loud and tremendous cheering.) The gentlemen who had got up the Tory address, once condemned him and his friends of the Liberal party, for keeping up the Political Union ; but now, knowing well that power sufficient to be available must be derived from the people, they were endea vouring (but too late) to engage the attention and affections of those whom they had long since and oft abused, and he would say, grossly insulted and trampled upon.—( Loud cheers. ) [Through some accident, the rest of the Report had not arrived up to the time whe n we wen t t o P ress . If it arrive, we shall give.it in a Second Edition. The meeting went off with the utmost tranquillity.l The rumours of appointments to the office of Clerk of Parliament are all premature ; it is possible, indeed, that no appointment may be made to that office, as arrange. ments are spoken of for executing its ....ties. We We can contrak:, me report of the death of Earl Forter,zia, and the consequent elevation of Lord Ebrington to the peerage. His Lordship is in the enjoyment of his custo mary health, ROLLS COURT,-(THIS DAY.) .7 11;;C:NIF.NT-TREVELVAN V. CIIARTSR. His Honor, the Master of th Rolls, gave judgment in this ease , in which the Bill was filed by the representatives of the late Sit John Trevelyan against the representatives of the late 111 r. Jobs Charter, for the purpose of setting aside a purchase made by DS• Charter of certain property in Devonshire, belonging to Sir Job Trevelyan, on the ground that the purchase had been effectedbi fraud and misrepresentation, and that the price was inadequat e ' The purchase took place in the year 1786, at which time ILif• Charter was the Steward of Sir John Trevelyan, and int o : capacity was employed by hiin to sell the Estates. His 1 ! °0 ; thought it clear from the evidence that there was a long continues misrepresentation on the part of Mr. Charter to Sir John Vt; velyan, and there was no evidence that up to the time of the del.__ of Mr. Charter, in 1810, Sir John Trevelyan had any know lesg ` of what the real transaction was. Such being the case his H onour felt bound to set aside the purchase, making the defendants p a y the costs of the suit. VICE-CHANCERY COURT. INJUNCTION-LADY DOVER AND TIER SON. COLNAGIII V. MITCHFLL. Mr. KEENE yesterday applied for an injunction ex-rte tore pastrain the defendant, who is a lithographic printer, from litluSaL; ing an engraving of he plaintiffs, from a picture of Sir 'Br e ; Lawrence, of Lady Dover and her son. Upon the Learned u t ., tleman making the application the Court required an affida' the plaintiff, that he had the sole right to make engravings the picture in question. Mr. KEENE this morning informed the Court that he ....- required affidavits, and His HONOUR granted the injunction. BEULAH SPA.—SMITH V. SIDNEY AND OTHERS. ct i o s Mr. KNIGHT applied in this case exparte for a special ink° 0.1 to restrain the defendants, who are the mortgagees of a prep e well known to our readers as the Beulah Spa, from selling thatP r t ; perty in one lot. The affidavit in support of the allegations in ss i e bill, stated that the defendants had advertised the pt operty f0r . ,,, on Friday next, in one lot, which it was alleged would be noStr t e judicial to the interests of the plaintiff, inasmuch as it would l e o , much more if sold in different lots ; and although the sale sol no t vertised for Friday, the particulars or conditions of sale bad been yet printed. His HONOUR thought it would be better to give the other notice. If that was done he would hear the motion on Thursday' Mr. KNIGHT acceded to this proposition, and thus the caserew. KING'S BENCH.-(THIS DAY•) TILE KING V. MILLINGEN AND OTHERS. Sir W. FOLLETT applied to their Lordships to fix a day for he at ' ng a motion in this case for a new trial. lastice Lord DENMAN said the Court was of opinion that public L A , pre"" would be best consulted by not adopting siich a course at.. ho e A gentleman who was apparently interested in the ease , rose, and was about to address the Court; when— des' The CIIIEF JUSTICE, in a very peremptory manner, so d him to sit down, observing that he was a witness in the an, be had no right to interfere after his counsel had been heard. A s (Lord Denman) had been thus pressed, he would say that it If that person's malicious conduct that originated the prosecution•bio, he did not sit down, the Court would feel it necessary to dire ct to be taken into custody. Witi s The other Judges were obliged repeatedly to threaten din , te a imprisonment before he could be induced to sit down. He A , 4 9ts o that he was not. the cause of the prosecution, but had been into it, and all he wanted by the present application was jes tice or The arguments in the case of the King v. the Marquis of De shire, were then resumed, and—. • or Mr. Sergeant LUDLOW prOceeded to address the Court i n 0 of port of the rule for a new trial, and to combat the argain ell Mr. Jervis, who had been yesterday heard. ELECTION COMMITTEES. (THIS DAY.) YOUGH AL. „ c ot , ' The Committee, on assembling this mor n i ng , resu med t"; ot° sideration of the evidence produced yeste r d a y, re l a tive to tb city of a person named Hennessey, who voted for the unsuccessf ul , it de' dilate. This was the casting vo t e, an d u p on th e d ec ision °' Fended the result of this investigation. fe e After about two hours' deliberation, counsel and ag en _,, -- iati‘l called in, and the Chairman of the C omm itt ee rea d the r"'"„ c k 0° they had come to, declaring that th e sa id vo t e s h ou ld be str" the poll, thus giving the sitting Member a majority o f onecb The Chairman was then proce e di ng t o rea d the resolutionsno. the Committee had come to, and w hi c h it was agree d he sho w " port to the House this evening, when A lt ° f Mr. WAKEFIELD desired to call their attention to that ! fl ir the Reform Bill which, for the p ur p ose o f di m i n i s hi n g elec t ,'" Ot t penses, gave Committees a disc re ti on w ith respect to the coa v re parties coming before them must i ncur . Th e petition in t" , 40 sent instance should be declared frivol ous an d vexa tious, insO u hit o it impugned Mr. O'Connell's qualification, and consequently P 5 tote to much expense in supp3rting witnesses in London to s ubstiT oe f, it ; notwithstanding which, they have not produced one e w er to question it. The petitioners h ave , i n f ac t, t o tally al? n _Abee° that charge. They next charged th a t ac t s o f i n timidation n'"; 0 pot perpetrated by Mr. J. O'Connell and his agents, yet they h g ch a ct• produced tile slightest particle of testi mon y t o prove any lariberli There were other charges contained i n th e petition, .0 , a ll 0 treating, &c., and besides, a general charge o f cor ruption , 1 ,01 which they have totally abandoned. The only point as t^ °b' evidence was produced, was the scrutiny ; a nd although t h e y sir jetted to 56 votes, they have only succe e d e d in disqualtir!: teen. This was a very small proportion, and he therefor in mitted, that the Committee would be only -actu l itijillt the most perfect accordance with the spirit of the Relbrt t bo and carrying out one o f it s most va l ua bl e principles, Ml l '4oo diminution of election expenses, if they exercised the dit n ot with which they were inv es t e d, w i t h respec t t o costs, orde r permit a sitting Member to be exposed to great expense , " ban cloo• to rebut charges that the opposite party may capriciouslY„atiat, Mr. D. POLLOCK said he never heard o f such an aPP his life. _ _OO Mr. WA K E pat LD said a similar application was made a few age in the Drogheda case. • • The Cll.kiibiAN—Was it successful? ; er esil; Mr. WAKEFIELD—NO ; but the circu ms t anc es were du ban - Mr. D. Potl.ocKs in reply, said that the qualificationlee' first, and was afterwards amend e d ; an d was procee ding t . 00 1 when— • The CHAIRMAN said the Committee had considered tbe f i e o ; : / question as to costs, and had agre e d t o th e following r es°ll te f eti' , 4 Th a t J o h n O'C onne ll, E sq., was d uly elected, an d that t tion and the opposition thereto was neither frivolous nor 01 CORK. The Committee is still occu pi e d h ear i ng ev id ence as to the 4:13 of the lands out of which Mr. O'Connor qualifies. ENNIS. 0 641 The scrutiny goes on as yet--the numbers were equal left. SHIPPING-(THIS DAY•) FROM LLOYD'S. DEAL, JUNE 1. —Wind S.S.W.—A rr i ve d th e —leo 0; Eliza, Helen, from Galway ; Hashemy, Stuart, fro° lip John Hicks, Bone, from F owey ; A nn an d Catharinl4 from Bangor , Triumph, Gre en , f rom B om b ay ; and tbessid nity, Woodall, from Demerara, A rr i ve d from the Riret hi etl, mains, the Fanny, Drummond, f or th e C ape o f G o od 1 4, X s sailed the Beau Ideal, Kingston, for Lisbon ; and the cett, Brooks, for Dublin. PORTSMOUTH, JUNE I.—Wind S.E. to S. S.W. FALMOUTH, MAY 31.—Wind N. moderate. v o loft LIVERPOOL, MAY 31.—Arrived th e Eli za b e th, 4--ge. Charleston. Off port the flawell, from New Orleans. „et, Princess Charlotte, Kirkby, f rom B om b ay . WATERFORD, MAY 29.—Arri ve d th e M art h a p o pe s fte ° from London. DROGHEDA, MAY 29.—A rr i ve d t h e Johannes, - Wthealter' le Memel. CORK, MAY 29...—Arrived the An nan d a l e , Hill, froze with loss of foremast, &c., bound to Bombay. Vis tfr. 'o 3 t fre HULL, MAY 31.—Arrived the Robert and MarPr e a s t et ps from Riga; Fra u Gesustcrs, 'Wilier, and Anne Kirstine , : 1 " Dantzic ; Catharine, Behrendt, from Pillau ; Concoro 4 eb from Rastock ; and Jenny, Smith, from Memel. Fie LIVERPOOL, JUN E I.—Th e Y oung Regulus, fr!"-aterl having got en th e m iddl e san d i n t h e S we i n, b ecam e - sn a but was extricated with assistance and loss of ancho r ggtilw Mem.—The Young Regulus arrived in the river oa the ej oi 33 1 3 0 GENERAL P O S T -O FFlCE . —N ewspapers to and f r o mf - Ayres may be forwarded by th e B raz il P ac k et , free °it for postage. ,A for the POST OFFICE. NOTICE.—A packet will b e pr ovid ed F 115 .10 bon Mail of this day, letters in time to-morrow evenh4 e nos 3 ' ) jesty's brig Opossum fo r th e M a d e i ra , Brazilian, andfoi Mail of this day ; letters in time to-morrow evening: Febriw . The Narita, Ployl, sailed from Newcastle on the Gibraltar, and has not since been heard of. ON] Instit The ANNA Bighol Neely at H a I le Right Hot it4 F L : rie lire l:l4ll: : fi retrd e s : e d, :n i j d jol :J .jh o . Th °Tn h hi n : r ,„ 11 ! 1 4 Henry, l ' a rk, John, E fiord, William I ,s 4 Awford, V.o T. e t* David LeDeli, J. Al.' ""sy, Ale 3 William rte, Georg e oler, „T an i Xas, G. F. IrrY, D. W wee, R. Esc i l avel, G. H. el, M. D. ] jon, Rich Samuel rgamte, He Charh L7"oirt, John, 17son. Henr -- Tton, John, 11 , 8 4 r-co urt —An'] B. t e . Place a t 4 COTT: SURAIS 4tostreet, rpon i l h r_muts Hawk rtZles Ifot uordon ital Du Goodet 1 1 Kin tot Z. Lan of uNQuEs' pATES Of P ORATION anew on "NI the Po] , wi l4 R P hENIiUM Wit, 1 4 the n l eription may 1, 4 011 low rato : i ,e4ra only, n Zables o f .94Ce, 449, 1 kiu------- Q] ~IIt G'4l4 p ~T UP B, : c ebb g: "Mouth, s bind, ..._ P •ftlons esti rwiatendeat Co s i N A °Pei THE Ro' ,lqice, that Hutan A y followin g, a ' holden at the Eleven o'cloi The N•l3.—Tl their Office kerchandize from Loss oi Grranting A LINE E T H Cap ,T•yrt for LI! , 1 01 from L (No The W IL I mola July Yrorri Loi *OM Fal AP Loi Won, " 4 3 Regent- GENE THE col% 0;" t tonstr uct 44h Intag ‘ l 'ilig it ( t er vrii ol c c t:Pres 'st a y Q i s he u teir i cot I I"sesses lr F I .lle' T P e4 N• \ C 'ritini • rav e VAR : ad 14 1'44 ;et iat C 4-et re ,4 4 4 pe ei Aertr t %bai t . a r t , artaxi4 11 7-titit • 7 44.ti s t,, et 'ito t tit ,13is . ‘aei r gig% ri m aj o ,, On the 18th ult., a t St. S ervan, F rance, t h e lady ° I dsr , K. Clubley ; o f a d aug ht er . ilo ola P On the '29th ult., in the Kin g ' s - roa d, th e l a dy of "- v— tau' rison, Esq., of a d aug ht er . of 13lir On the Ist inst., the lady of Andrew Amos, Esq'' crescent, of a son. ______./ _ __l _,,,p . MARRIED. . v ioie On the 12th ult., at the British Embassy in Nal )le9 ' ' 4 0 I e , Thomas, Esq., to Miss Dalrymple. to ,0- On the 31st ult. Mr. M. Abrahams, of Manchestertoy of daugnter of the late Rev. Dr. R. Aleldola ; the ee _ 11 %0,,be celebrated by the Rev. Dr. S. Hirschell, in the presenet:aa, 0 , select assembly, amongst whom was the Rev. Dr. B °l Oi ' Holy Land. t to On the 30th ult., Mr. W. Li vermore , of Oxford -stye e ' „ or lc, second daughter of Mr. G as ti neau , o f C am b e rwell• e i q e s 3 4 6 On the Ist inst., S S. J ose ph, E sq ., o f the City; . . i l '' ve 11° to Emily, third daughte r o f S o l omon C o hen, 01 ' f° /.....,, Canonbury. _...---------- tv DIED. . of ,et On the 27th ult., at Tunbridge Wells, Dorothea, Te l (0 , late Robert Scott, Esq., late of Lichfield, Stafforlshire. „ oi i..' On the 29th ult., at Denmark-hill, Ann, field, Esq. 6oll ' 0 1 On the 30th ult., in Devonshire-phce, in his 46th S ear ' „ls Thornton Bayley, Esq., of the thin. East India Cora?' i tp f service on the Bengal Establishment. wife ° Vide of Willi. e On the 30th ult., at Ash-grove, Hackney, Rebecca, 34 1 be ` go Stephen Taylor, of Fenchureh. street. At Bath, Colonel Robert Bull, C.B. and K.H., late of t itio Horse Artillery, aged 56. capta iPj On the 24th ir.st., Mrs. Eleanor Browne, wife of . the Browne, R.N. b°lr"f the Liverpool, aged 54, a ft er an ill nes s of only eight for 0 Rev. Samuel Saunde rs , f or a p er i o d o f twenty years P as et Baptist Society in Fr ome . On the 26th ult., at Compton Greenfield, in her 924 Yet". 6 14 Morgan. eti 9°. On the 22d ult., at Clonakilty, Ireland, Mr. Justice, a g st , At Barnstaple, aged 86, George Kingson : Esq. 15th Y e On the 23d ult. at Linden, Nortliumberiand, in h er • of Jemima, youngest ult., of On the 24 4 . d 'of Captal, Charles W. Bigge Esq. . 0 r) tut., Mil. Eleanor Brown, wi ow - „ t o p. O • _..,,.ne, R.N. John A lli '- u sr cl ' On the 20th ult., at Alverne-hill, Penzanceo,_ _ apo n L, Esq., late Major of his Majesty's sth Regiment t lir On the 22d ult., Joseph Ridgway, ■•••••=ar_ ,_, YOU NG, ° 00 Esq., of Poulton, neat she ; 0 London : Printed and Published by WIRD() ~tt h e c 0 112, Strand, at The Sun office, No. 112, Strum: w' of Middlesex, One Yeav