The Sun. — London, England, 1835-02-28 00:00:00

in eitreeVl d, he bad nber of ras• • but he 00 ng the isi' Ma th satisfaction duke; and b e give satisfile. be diminished e goverorreD t who had Vol on. friend (S ir motion in t" eet alluded to would wait Po taken by the 1,1 been calf 26 nmult to seat Writ: r 0 4man WS; regulations 0. he imporl ance 'thin of info r ' rivers of baci'' the last 004 lay he hould e into the e 5" member, the ocision for the t ‘pori that ' Lib' provioo fora I proprie_ ricultutal cted with the in moving.'" ery exto dit the upon i d .) He Vis I any rei n T e he country , these statistic,' ind he ha d ' ics t ion. ( 11e64 . pith parti cu " ,l : 1 but in ge.ker r n that, .wn's in his PI a CC : had taken 0. importation' ? _ s o that had'" • h a t practice. 'nt) had t;3'ii,e tired Would mputed to tb o f s Du the Pa rt Iwayo r the law 3 ' to the Pubs being e%C to the ou"" he n told that t ,i ; arried on Leer of the ~, ar, hear. :OMplete WC' , hin Id tho* th e ame urn t o ye pr actice of Man , 13 At °)e rkets. gully a fro' on tte subie ct ating thol3l tion of tho a, namelY, tb lin front th"- ernment tO I" tot it that rl3o° ,erty of put t ' t hon. ba; ° t hs y forwar d re, enlight e orr e king bi n ' ,„ir Sajeoty's one t o the i l , ll , l a footing question W. not Pr 6 I .nded to pa+7 4 ght to het a c , nunicir' ' Co o' of the ot its 00' c if • had h ii ' v' oc r s pernel o •that " Dt p. J ot Pr ° _, ighs—'t :e should put r in r ° of enq u country f th e .Ilor, for ou t aroughr• the Pr , 0. 1 nset.t 0' d ruse did not be put rito whateve. old bore'' , i p the Ine z. " 15 kingd° l-1 ;0 , I were W 1 I snit' tb i t ; se to P ti be of; the h tic' er the 4 line , • I Nvithti ° 7 td ,o , of the . ea t of such re the CO" !r the OP' ar, he ar ' ) 1 0 de ien id the Malt nor ce a lit tle ) hear,. 1 decision 0,50 onneete d 0 111 was ge tte- 0 •1, as, there, i a sulaiced, ode in e i t %ot Lon 161/4 , e , this h °e "trii to D v , 'e : i re on to be . f t t he r,e D pd ';:+t "14h- t ;go' 3rther PO ° et h--- .a tr ey :p ecteJ o r aPP rile c o it' sue h i ' tilf / u ty to° - 10.4 a t if It uP °l ' ,0 0 him as 1P n eeretiir e of the hon. members for I'm/meth and Mitten were not at al: !_pPl , cable t o h i m and these who acted with him on hi s sid e o f th e h ouse. '-he burden of those h on. mem b ers ' song was, that he (sir. Hume) was fa nxious to get the Tories out of office, in order that he might get into entered into I t was well known that such a thing had never void of i t n r it u o th. h is mi n d, an d t h e assert i on, therefore, was entirely It seemed, however, to b e th e on ly argument that... could be brou g ht f orward on the other side.—(Hear, hear.) team Tories? their long experience in misrule they were incapable of bringing ibr. Ward liberal measures. Their pioneeers had promised much, but what con fidence could be placed on such promises ? It was to the credit of the right . h9o,hart, that he declared that he was still unchanged, though he was that m insorted by a. sect i on of the House; but what was the bond high united them ?—was it a uniformity of opinion ? No, it was the Church party. That assertion was of course received with cheers; but he would repeat the assertion that it was the dorni lidera Church party. I t m i g h t b e thought offensive to call the Noble Lord, the member for Lancashire's patty a section of the house. Th e party on this side had been cal'ed a Tail. Be i t Tail or party, he, during his experience in party, never witnessed More unhallowed coalition In the late parliament, they allatoerted that they were Whigs, whether old or new ones, he could say;t but it was evident that they were not reformers. t at se as a matter of surprise to him to know how the ri g ht ho n . b arone t member for Cumbei'and, who upon every occasion that tie met his Constituents, declared his total di ssen t f rom t h e pr i nc i p l es t h ey professed, !!o . _ he could re conc il e t h e coa li t i on which he formed with them. Was It the coalition of principle or of place?—(Cheers.) How often had he deci a red that he had no confid ence i n hi s M a j esty ' s G overnment ? e,e . would be delighted to see the Right Honourable Baronet the Member for Cumberland, and the Noble Lord • the Member for nothing join the Admini e l s tration—( loud cries of "Hear, heard))— . u 'ing could please him better, fnr it would then show the Reformers " England who were the true Reformers.—(Great cheering.) What : ' " e they ? Why, nettling else but wolves in sheep's cloathing, look. pfor a fold where they could enter aed enjoy the good r ungs and benefits of place. He must say that the members of such a addition would for ever disgrace themselves. What was their conduct on the Church Temporalities Bill ?—(Hear, hear.) Could any coo& dente be placed in the men who supported the 147th clause of that bill. The right hon. baronet (Sir James Graham), according to the news- PaPers of the dav , speaking of the strength of that section (Lord Stanley's) •• sal they were always distinguished for their steady support to The Whige—(hear, hear, hear.) The names of these steady sup_ Porters were given in the Morning Chroniele, who met at the house of the noble lord. Amongst them was Lord George Bentick, who it wa's stated walked arm in arm with Mr. Hughes Hughes.--(Laughter ) Th e right hon. baronet (Sir J. Graham) was also there. Other gentle. Mee were named who, it appeared, went to the meeting, same in an omnibus and others in a cab. He (Mr. H.) denied that any of t hem weresteatly Reformers. Take for instance the right hon. baronet the member for Newcastle (Sir M. Ridley). He never was a steady re gentler; he always Was neutral and uncertain, and nobody could ever te:l hew he would vote, until the division had taken place. Sometimes he was a decided out.and-out Tory, and at other times a Whig; and ortee he made a Whig speech, and then gave a Tory woe._ (Loud laughter, and cheers.) Next he (Mr. Fiume) found the na me of the noble lord, the member for Norwich (Stormont). Could : 4 one' say that he was a steady reformer, who, during the dis `l'4ion 0 , 1 %, the reform bill, voted on as he did ?—(Hear, hear.) would not trespass upon the house by naming the other gen. e i m ' th e n who Attended the meeting—suffice it to say, that not one '„'' e ra could beedeemed real reformers. The right hon. baronet (Air aliv 'eel) will find ttis new allies but halOand.half friends, who are waiting '3 to see in wharelirection the wind will blow. But firer eform party Would,; now know their friends—they would know who were reformers and i i2 l n-r eforerners. The meet:ng, therefore (at Lord Stanley's), was of th a lk ' rta "ce, inasmuch as this advantage was derived from it, G 'they (the reformers) were enabled to distinguish their friends i c an their enemies. He (Mr. Hume) thought that the right ,71°thable baronet (Sir Jame 9 .Graham) was peculiarly unfortunate bi. 'en he spoke of e factious opposition. If any member were to „Line on that head, the right hon. baronet was as liable to the impute to-Zs" any gentleman of that house, and yet he now talks of factious ' ll°B4 ton—calls , us on this side of the house a rope of sand, and says t hat T . we were determined to root up the institutions of the country. 6, " is thus he atteMpts to throw dirt upon his old allies, and,like all hasty 4 ' 4,6 . who, generally, lest their sincerity should be doubted, be rte the most zealous agents of the party they join, and exceed g e , ern in vilifying the party they desert. But, thank God, they (the lie°llriers) had found out who were their sincere friends.—(Hear.) "on. baronet and the noble lord might endeavour to cover their ,I,J"Ndstency in`the mime they had taken last night, but e°n gratulsted them Olson their proceedings, and he heartily congra. ew ' • t ed the reformers upon having got rid of them, because iv ; (11 4. Hu me ) was a l wa y s o f o pinion that an open enemy t far to be preferred to a pretended friend, and who was "ready to ehn lound at every opportunity that might ,resent itself The Reform. thesatisfaction of beating not only the Tories but the Stanley a - e l a. t ? , with all the assistance they could bring tu the aid of their new al nTherefurts,. it was, he conceived, a double victory, and therefore he not press .flee amendment he intended to move. The Noble 'the member . - fer Lancashire, fully satis fi ed the house upon one to t namely, his t,.' a 1 want of modesty, if they were to . judge by the I,l4'iner in which he e %used those with' whom he had hitherto acted. we ts a'ae one thing %Wel in the noble lord's speech . which kzid'etl considerably with' him (Mr. Hume) in withholding his t endr aent. He stated that the real question was whether or a n t he house was quite prdpared to reject the present ministry, „ t hat it vies undisguisedly a vote to express want of confidence in I}, t - 4°vernment. He hoped the house would carry to the foot of the no, e an address expressive of' such a feeling.—(Hear, hear.) It ee d ' 441 upon the opposite side, that the characters of Lord Brougham o°f Lord L yndhurst were not to L . e compare- 1 . He was quite ready ( t i .,"'Pare th em e i t h er as regar d e d t h e ir public or their private lives oh, from the ministerial benches)--because the eliAraeter of the Sinks when placed in contradistinction with the former. .What rto be said that the friend of liberty, the advocate of uni o ersa l It eb `", the man who encouraged liberal education, the benefactor Of rece, was to be placed in comparison with the noble arid e,,;tl lord who now sat on the woolsack ? 11!ary gentlemen re eh, ti ere d the time when Lord Lyndhurst brought • • with him from e4i"lca the Republican principles of the United States, awl when beheld I. 4 Nolis far stronger than any which he (Mr. Hume) e Yet advocated. say there was no comparison between their publics conduct as e ord e certainl y was not in their private life.—(Cries ofd Oh, oh!") he B rougham was as superior to Lord Lyndhurst, in • pieblie, as perk in his private demeanour. He did not with to th o ' v ere in this line of observation; but when the challenge was It WWn out, were they to sit still and - decline the comparison? tre,:',lrue that Lord Brougham had committed some errors, but they 'sa gs " m ost entirely from good motives, from his attending public meet arel dinners, and from his desire to identify himself with the people, h A t b e nter into their feelings.—(Hear, bear.) But those errors he en ee n grossly exaggerated by his enemies, and his lordship had to • • Y 'alter! w th much unmerited obloquy. Mr. Hume then proceeded Pah ll '''Pate the political characters of the Duke of Wellington and Lord eSe rl ets ton, and of Sir it.. Peel and Lord Melbourne, and to show that in otob e r., of view the pelitical principles and characters of the members fasi, e at e administration were far preferable, and much more conducive lha ie Pr ogress Q f reform and the welfafe arid happiness of the people than' Nes of the pre Wit ministry. He maintained that gentlemen opposite, nae a cere chiefly 'returned by close corporations, should be the last to Ste t °f freedom of4lection ; and that it was utterly impossible to ex hort i l f ° ° ,l government from such men as the conservative s. The right {lie aq• opposite had admitted that it was now impossible to carry on kigh t l i ve n'lment on principles opposed to public opinion p re yet the sh ut soLn. bart. could not certainly maintain that he was ppared to tie ~,`"ose reforms and changes which the public voice demanded. to 14 -41 d tell the right hon. baronet that it would be impossible for him alite rr ! 05 1 any government, unless he did explains the principles on btsd his reform was to be effected. He expected ministers would have Cl l R °Me declaration of when they intended to bring forward the te, 1 4% ReformLa Reform which the country looked for with more 4 % 4 1 i nan any other, and on that subject he is intent. He could Il te right hon. baronet that he would never have peace, .nor rse,, t to thNt have country was r peace in Ireemoved land, u— (ntil Hear, the overgrown) The hear. establish. to o . • Ple Ne ro , ENtland were not aware how much they were actually that7ted in tins reduction of the Church in Ireland. He was convinced "ere,,,," te Malt tax might be taken off if the Church Establishment were tre.,,, e ham that country—it would save more than a million of Vele " to the' pockets of the people of England. It was all very the r the right hon. baronet to amuse the house with his attention to slat ci , i e 'e e i Plihe of, the Church Establishment in England, lost tet tl i`o the people of England, at least those parte who dis ae,,,from it, care about its discipline or its arrangement? firal, 4 "' the noble Lord (Stanley) and the right lien. Baronet (Sir James tO he enemies to all Ceduction of taxation, whilst they were ( l ea t ° Aphofd the abuses' of the church in Ireland rt e , ) ~ " e ar, hear.) He feared that' -.instead of relief there would thty . to build s ne w c h urc h es —b ut h e ' would tell that House that it the peneNteurred iir\ such a proposition the 7 would offend nine.tenths of !se against of the trnited Kingdom. He, c n tae part of the people pro_ se, leaned such decease. He was sure that' hessse would never be al. e ti to tie mion. whole system r emain quiet till there was a review of the of Coi• • R ea il °l °t 3eI SIBTHORPE said he had nev e r made illy assertion that 144, „ rat wh trtle, and if the teen. gentleman alluded to hinia. he would tell eat he h a d slated eva.s not correct. f e tes HU MS "l•r• —What does the hon. colonel mean to say ? If he ai. h e • o f 110 have said any thin untrue, I deny it.—(Much Idaeghter at N gentleman's warmth.) , SIRT HORP-1 ask the hon. gentlemen if he charges me ? It,' laughter,) Rh t er,) t hN- Q i never spoke of the noble and gallant colonel, and sir °1:59 could not charge him. ht). }7 W ILMOT complained of the allusions made to him, and those t end lei W ith hive by the hoe. member for illiddlesex. He had at ,set.,l h - beT the h ouse of the noble lord (Stanley) but he was an independent !, 1 eo n .. O f Parliame n t. It was !most unfair to call him a sheep in wolf's Nance - - ( La ughter )— because he had refused to join in the unholy a 1,.. ,.. pIU kthe other M side. , E explained. ote up " o HA lIDS hop e d it requ i re d no assurance from hi m t h a t hi s 'Flit:4ls: t ire question of the a dd ress l ast n i g h t was h ones tly, con e c i. st T o , %and independently given—(lean) Whatever the hon. mein tt't Middlesex • e lemight choose to assert, he (Mr. Richards) would yen. Iso o. e d _ r ed that his character wa: as pure anti unsullied as that of 11 ss y , bich a:oer, or any of his associates—(hear, hear.) As to the 'Ws k i kr t he hon. member had had the good taste to repeat from a e begged to state that it was totally false and unfounded. Nee „ e l' ta n ES•HUGHES supposed the bon. member for Middlesex ,'Olo - "'• MY that any part of his imputations were intended to apply 1) 41 Ile (Mr H ) egged to state, for the information o ne the 1 sa le a hti the • th e Puelte, that lie never was under the roof of the ble any inember for Lancashire in his life ; neither had he ever held Neis!Tninunicarren, either written or orally, with that noble Lord on the ei,: r 'ct of the aiciress, or upon any other matter whatever.—(He r, i tt e ' b t o o , n . that h e hat'. n ta t , s houldnot be ashamed if lie had ; but he thought it right to 'ot, to show the correctness of the assertions which li" 4.s " M ember for 'Middlesex had had the boldness .to make. '1 he (Mr. H. Hughes) was ?—(Laughter. 'litstt• ! m ember c had a s k e d Wh at he ) t° j 4 ;_i i d of vie v . the place that h e h a d th e h onour t o represent, an d . „ 11 3' in his own pan* he begged to answer that he was one of 4cti,„e lon e Ineber's con stituency.vsbo strongly object "a eof conduc m t that Le Wai then pursuing .—(Cheers.)ed to the . , ts h , .MUNICIPAL CQRPORATIONS. hoe , a. Oli-N CAMPBELL said that, alter the declaration of th e ri g h tt eet t he se dr ° es t ' hat he sh ou ld not oppose the bringing up the report upon . It avould not be necessars for him to trespass upon the pa. cirthe e, 'he w , L. He merely rose-to snake a single observation, or 4 , 40,, ti rather he should say to give a notice. In consequence of the to le ?" of the arrendment it would now be part of the address to be to. set to the rn. foot . el' the throne, that it was the opinion of that house 1 4 b e ~`2 _ uneemal corporations of the kingdom ought, without delay, , the c • C a eel under right and proper control. Those with whom he (Sir \ had the honour to act, lulled that as soon as the report of instil ' I ners should be laid upon the talge, his Majesty's govern ''°"l,l ti o .propose and submit to the house t measure to carry into l; .4t Part of the address. If that, however,Aould not be the case, '' ' l ie e ee t l eave to eive notice that he, in concurrence with those with l‘kr i L n e eeted, would prepare and 'submit to the house a bill for that see ([ ,hear.) • hey .ILRSON TENNENT addreged the house at some length ; " 6e 1[ buzz that prevailed at the time rendered the hon. mem. tt bde es ' • ely .. i . nabdible. It was only possible to catch a few detached hen , 14,0 ' t Ze understood hi m to stat e t h at h e s h ou ld not h ave c b . , e house had it net be en fi e t h e p ersona l a tt ac k th at h a d ho4wp,. Toil him by the h on. menthe for Middlesex, aid which he I,tql g to leave wholly unnoticed' The hon. member had as_ .14 ap_'' he (Mr. Tennent), in the vote se bad given upon the address, 'Weil his conduct to be influenced by the dictum of an individua • TH E SUN, LONDON, SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1835. bon; member for Belfast, eontaining snore republ;can prineipks than h had ever beard uttered within the walls of parliament, and in which tan: hon. member held up the American Coustitution as a Model on whi the Constitution of this country ought to befirnaed. He also recollected that when, on a former occasion, he reminded that lion, gentleman of Cie principles he had onca advocated, a ; " blush came over his counte nance, and yet that hon. gentleman had now the audacity to taunt os with our adherence to the Opposition, and - the votes we gave on this occasion. The . coalition of the Whigs and Reformnrs had been called factious and anomalous; hut he wont.; ask, was there ever known such an anomalous or factious coalition-as that which had been forme I on the other side between the noble, lord (Stanley) and the right hen baronet ? That noble lord was imitating the canduct which the riiht honourable baronet himself pursued towards the late administration. Like the right hon. baronet, during the existence of that Government, the noble lord was of•ring the &neat ministers his support, in order to weaken them. He was a giving them a ruinous assistance, with a view first to bring them into disrepute with the country, and then to turn upon theme In the great struggle now going on between the contending parties in the country, he would ask whether the people would admit of the neutrality assumed by the noble lord (Stanley) and his party, when neutrality was itself a crime ? He who was not for us was against us. He acknowledged that he had, in his place in Parliament; expressed that - wish, it was because he entertained the hope that a new Cabinet would be formed in consonance with the spirit of the age. But when he found that the first act of the new ministry was one not only directed against the existence of a reformed Parliament, but in direct hostility to the very principles of the Reform till—when he found that their ac. cession to power was regarded as a triumph of a party, of a do mestic faction—and tle;t almost the first step tlivy adoptad . in Ireland was to sanction, or rather prompt a military force to execute deliberate and skilful Murders of his unoffending countrymen, then iX was that he felt that the change had wrought no - benefit, and' that he had to contend against a ministry more hostile than ever against the principles he avowed and the interests he had ever endeavoured to up. hold. lie. had, indeed fondly hoped that after the passing of the Reform Bill the country would have been spared the horror of seeing a tory ad ministration again in power. It was not of course to be supposed that the inventors of that machine were to have an exclusive patent for working out its effects; but neither, nn the other hand, was it intende that it should be mangled or destroyed by its opponents. With regard to the dissolution of the late parliament, Ise admitted that it was done by the exercise of the undoubted prerogative of the crown ; but it did not follow that the prerogative was judiciously or wisely exercised. Upon the right hon. baronet fall the responsibility of that dissolution. It was said that by opposing the right hon. baronet we were disputing the King's prerogative. and in fact impairing the constitutional powers of the crown ; but nothing could, in his opinion, be more de structive. of those powers than the doctrine held forth by the right honourable baronet himself, who had told the House of Comm Ons that he ought not to be opposed, since his Administration could carry measures in the House of Lords which no other party in tire state could dO, Could anything be more dangerous to the prerogative of the Crown, or even to the House of Lords itself, than the holding forth of such language? and yet because he (Mr. F. O'Connor) and those with whom he acted were opposed to men who used that language, hon. members on the other side of the house bad the presumption, audacity and hardihood, to call him and his friends a factious opposition. They were, however, determined, not. withstanding these opprobrious terms, to stand up and assist the Whig Reformers. He supported them because they were the real Conserve_ Lives, and were anxious to preserve the constitution upon a fair and firm basis. The present was a contest between industry, activity, and intel- Fgence on the one hand, and cloth, ignorance, impudence, and pride on the other. Why should they be asked whence should come an Ad. ministration? It must come from men whoSe views were in conso nance with the feelings of the people. He would conclude by assuring the tight hon. baronet that the vote he was about to give would not be a fact:ous one, but would be the result of a conviction that it was the only one he could give consistently with the duty he owed to his country. Sir HENRY HA RDINGE rose not with the intention to occupy the time of the house. This was the fourth evening he had attended in his place, in the expectation that some hon. member connected with Ireland would make an attack on the existing government in that country. The hon. and learned gentleman who had just sat down, had afforded the first onpartunity for him (S.r H. Hardinge) to justify the conduct of that government. The lion, and learned gentlemen had adverted to the lamentable and unhappy afiltir at Rathcermac, and had spoken of it as a stigma en the government of this day, in having been accessories to that deplorable event. He (Sir H. Hardinge) assured the house, that this was a charge altogether unfounded in fact. The tithes in question were due on the 4th of November, and from that time up to the 4th of De. cember, the late government made the whole of the arrangements for the employment of the troops for levying those tithes. Every circum stance connected with the Itathcormac affair was made by the late go. vernment, therefore he would maintain that the unhappy and lament. able result that occurred was by no means attributable to the present administration. In saying this, he was far from intending to throw blame on the late government. That government could not do otherwise than maintain the law, and give protection to the owners of tithe property, and enable them to levy the arrears which were due. But when the Hen. Member thought proper to accuse the present Government of having conducted that affair, he (Sir 11. Hardinge) feit it right to state that the whole of the arrangements were mode by their predecessors. The Hon. and Learned Member had also stated that he did not ,ee why he and his friends should be accused of any inconsistency in joining the Whigs. He (Sir H. Hardinge) hal no objection to see those Hon. Gentlemen in amity and coalition with the Whigs' against whom they —and especially the great leader of their party—had been wont to use the most violent language. file Hon. and Learned Gentleman had himself accused the Whigs of being the greatest oppressors that Ire land had ever suffered under. Neither could he (Sir H. Hardinge) reconcile the conduct of the Whigs in joining with the advocates of the repeal of the Union. At all events, such conduct was perfectly irre concilable with the principles cf the old Whigs. A few weeks before the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin came to England, when addressing his constituents, he assured them that he would not mention the repeal of the Union for some time, because, though he was as de. termined as ever to press that measure, he considered it would prevent an e:rectual opposition being formed against the present Government. :But he added, that when the Ministers should be, removed even if he should take office under the Whigs—be would never be con tent until Ireland had her domestic Parliament' in " College-green. Under these eirctimstancea, he would ask, could the right hon. gente man, the member for Cambridge, hold a seat in the same Cabinet with the hon. and learned member for Dublin ?—(Cheers from the Ministerial benches.) How could that right hon. gentleman c:insent to discuss with • the hon. and learned member the repeal of the Union? The one said that the panacea for all the ills of Ireland was the repeal of the Unfon ; while the right hon. gentleman, on the contrary, said that if the Union were repealed, it woa:d dismember the empire, while it would not be ad vantageous to Ireland. He asked, then, how could those two hon. gen. Verner' coalesce? And yet the hon. and learned gentleman had said that he would accept office. He knew that he must come into office.__ (Here Mr. Spring Rice intimated his dissent.) Ay, the right hon. gen. man might doubt it; but' the hon. and learned gentleman had said, in his address to his constitue icy, that he was satisfied they had at least two.thirds of the force, including Radicals, which must constitute the majority in thii house ; and; therefore, he would consent to accept office expressly and purposely to advance his favourite object —the repeal of the Union. But he would not press this subject in the absence of that hon, end learned member. He would merely add, that so far ,as the ape ointment and employment of troops in Ireland wer • , _ . concerned, he should, whenever n..cessary, be able to show that the con duct of the present government, was in ever respect p;rfectly justifiable. lie should show that in every instance the emp!oyment of troops had been conducive in saving men's lives ; and he would defy hon. gentle. men opposite to show one intsance in which the troops had misconducted themselves, or their officers improperly interfered with the people.-. (Cheers ) Mr. FINN and Mr. G. F. YOUNG rose together, but the latter gave way. Mr. Finn said that the right hon. baronet seemed, puzzled to know how it was that the Repeaters of Ireland and the Radicals of En;- land could take part with the Whigs. The reason was obvious —the Repea!ors and Radicals agreed with the Whigs in many things; but they did not agree in anything with the Tories. The Conservatives . in Eng_ land were a distin , d race of men from those in Ireland. There they were the spoiled children of centuries of misrule. They claimed for themselves an exclusiv'e title to the virtue of loyalty. They say, w e are the only true loyalists, and as for those common papists, damn Utz• fellows, give them places in the police, or anywhere else, so that it bea subordinate station."—(Lau,ghter.) Mr. W. WILLIAMS begged to enter his dissent to that part of the Royal Speech which represented the trade and commerce of the country as in a fiourighing state. So far as :le was connected with trade, he could positively declare that the representation was inset erroneous. Ti:e branch of trade with which he wail COllneeted was in a state of great de pression and suffering, such as he should not have be level possible to exist s had he not witnessPd it with his own eyes. He had had many , pportunities of making himself acquainted with the real 6tate of th) case in this respect. He did not consider that this depression proceeded iron; the want of a demand. He considered that the fre,trade doctrines at been the ruin of trade, by bringing foreign manufactures into co:n. petition with our own before we Were prepared for it, To determine the question, all they had to do was to compare the amuunt of taxation upon the articles of consumption in foreign countries with that which prosstd upon the industry of this Country. The hon. member teferrod to the state of the. manufacturing interests in Coventry, which, at the present moment, were in a state of considerable depression, in illustration of his argument Ihe declined at present from going into details, hitt he should be prepared to to tg when the motion of which notice had been given by •an I:00. member upon this gubject should be before the house. The iron. member concluded by exprtiosing his bpli,f that the measures of reform promised by his majesty's government Would not 54isfy the country. Upon that ground he had supported the arnentimont, but mono especially because it called f.r more extensive reform of corporations than was promised by the address, or the speech from the throne, of which jt was the echo. Mr. 0, V, YOUNG said that as one of the individuals who had been I °floured with the abu4 thp Jimi. Member for - Middlesex, he wished :o say a few words, . Although he had twice seepi}ded ncqpination of t lion, Gentlonan upon thn hu§ting9, hp had'ilgt waplid Ii yittrm., • From thy course, however, pursued of tate by that hot), Gehtl ,, '' 4 red idmio f more honoured by his censure than by Icts man, he cons,. of Ole boo. Member, He lig(1 no hositution in members quitting the house, vindicated his support of the late Ad:4i , eistration, whom he hoped and expected - soon to see return to power. Mr. ROCHE expressed his dissatisfactionlat the ambigniti e of the ministerial policy with respect to Ireland. Mr. E. CURTEIS considered the attacks made upon his honour:11;1e friend (Mr. Hume) as most unjustifiable. Ne member of that house had done so much for the country an his hen. friend. He would vier. tore to say that the country would never have hail the benefit of any of those reductions of expenditure effected by the Tory governmeets, had it not been for the unrernitlsng asaistatic of his lion. friend in f-Jrcing upon the attention of parliament the abuses of our finance se— tem.—(Hear ) He wished to know from the right hon. baronet, the Secretary for !Wand, whether the public prints had correctly reported the fact that the thanks of the government were conveyed to the cfe.. cers and men engaged in the affair of Rathcormac. Sir HENRY HARDINGE did not think the question of the hot,. gentleman quite fair,. seeing that a notice of' motion stood upon C. - re. order.book for the production of the letter referred to by the hon. gel gentleman. If the hon. gentlemen had reflected, or had more expeie. once in that house, he would not, under the circumstances, have put such a question. Mr. CURTEIS was not so young in that house as to stand in nerd of the lessons of the right hon. baronet. A vote of thanks to men w:140 had sacrificed the lives of their fellow-men before the proper tribune! had pronounce d utain the character of the act, was premature and im prOpr.—(Hear, hear.) fly such conduct the Government departed from that line of neutrality which they were bound to observe.—)Hear, hear.) If the men fired without the order of the civil power, they were guilty of murder. The dismissal of the late Government was, in his opinion, most uncnurteous and improper. That dismissal would net advance the purpose of the right hon. baronet (Sir R. Peer. The home. however, had been told, that if they dared to do their duty, they would again be sent to their constituents. If the GovernMent executed any such threat, they would deserve the fate of Polignac, without one tear o' pity.—(Cheers.) Mr. THOMAS ATTWOOD said he had that day received a letter of remonstrance from Iris constituents against that part of the Specs from the Throne which represented trade as in aliourishing cendition., This his constituents treated as a mockery of their sufferings. Excep! . ing in Lancashire, and there not among the mass of the people, he knew of no part of England where capital produced a return, or the working Classes were not in a state of great depression. When agriculture was suffering, how could trade or commerce flourish ? With a dele cf 800,000,001?!., and wheat at 45. ed. a bushel, the great interests of the country could not but be in a state of depression. He, therefore, begged to enter his humble protest against tliat part of the Royal Speech wide) falsely—he had almost said wickedly, represented the trade and tom. 'tierce of the colliery to be in a satisfactory state. Neither could he concur in the opinion coming from the same source, that there was much to boast of in the foreign relations of this country. Itu , sia had been allowed to trample under foot the Treaty of Vienna; and she lied .also 'trampled upoe the interests of Englaud with regard to Turkey. As a representative of the people of England, he for one was not dis posed to pocket such an insult upon the national honour. For his part, he did not •think the honour of England was safe in -the keeping of the present Ministers. The Address, as amended, was then agreed to. Mr. GOULBURN then moved that the King's Speech be taken into consideration to-morrow. Mr. HUME wished to know what time the house would proceed to St. Jx.mes's with the addross ? Mr. GOULBURN replied that the house would meet at one o'clock ; iut that the hour at which it would be his Majesty's pleasure to receive he a:ldress was nut yet known. The question was then put and carried. COLONIAL SLAVERY. Ur. FOWELLBUXTON wished to put a question of eonsidetabl importance to the honourable gentleman the Under-Secretary for the Colonies. He wished to know what steps had been taken, or wore likely to be taken, for providing for the educat►on of the negroes in the Colonies. Mr. GLADSTONE said that it was not very easy to reply to 'the question in a few worck. All he could say was, that since the present Government had entered office, the attention of the noble lord at the head of the colonial department had been most anxiously directed to the subject. A very short time before he received the seals of race, eir. cuter letters had been sent to all the West India colonies, demanding from all the religious bodies and ecclesiastical authorities engaged in promoting education and reigious worship there, very full information as to the extent of means existing Of course, before the Govern ment could be enabled to decide upon the amount of instruction re quired, they must be in possession of the fullest information as to the amount at present existing. The returns were now arriving daily, One or two colonies had already sent them ; but, of course, it was he. possible to come to any definite measure until the whole had arrived : that time he hoped the noble lord at the need of the colonial department would be enabled to make up his mind upon the subject. With regard to the expenses, he trusted a large portion of the deficiency would supplied from private sources, and by the exertions of religious bodies. For the remainder they should apply to Parliament, if necessary ; be. lieving that the pledge Parliament had given to assist in the religiou, education of the West India apprentices was just as distinct add bind. ing, even though it was not as determined, as their pledge to pay twenty millions of money.—(Hear, hear.) . , Mr. FOWELL BUXTON had another question which he was de. sirous to tale this opportunitY of asking. It was highly important tta• persons should be appointed as special magistrates who had no connec `' .... tion or interest in common with the West India body. I-le wished know whether the persons who had been appointed in Jamaica we. e individuals of this description, or whether, in fact, any of the ordinary magistrates of the colony had been appointed. Mr. GLADSTONE was unable to say that such persons had not been appointed as special magistrates in any case. Thus much, however, he could say, that no person interested in the West India colonies had been appointed as a special magistrate in the leand of Jamaica.---(Hear, hear.) It was impossible to give any absolute pledge upon the subject, because the Governor of the colony retained, under the Act, the power of doing anything which was necessary in his judgment for the preservation of its peace and tranquillity. It was important that the hon. gentleman and the house should be aware that the governor of Jamaica had re fused his assent to an Act making the appointment of these magistrate, absolutely necessary and a matter of course, and that his conduct met with the fullest apprObation of the government and of the coloay. No thing was further from the wish of the English government—nothing was further from the wish of the colonial government—nothing could he more improper than that appointment should be deemed a matter of ne cessity in every case.—(lle,r, hear ) PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS. Mr. O'BRIEN moved, in pursuance of the notice he had placed upon the paper, the following resolution :—" That, in the opinion of this house, it is expedient that the public at large should have the oppottu. n:ty of purchasing, at so low• a rate as circumstances will admit, the totes and all other Parliamentary papers which may be printed fur th... ti-e of this house." The hon. member then intimated, that it was his _ _ intention to move a resolution, " That Mr. Speaker take the necessm y steps to carry the above resolution into effect." Alter a desultory conversation, In which Sir K. PERI. and Mr. HUNIs took part, the hon. gentleman consulted, on the suggestion of the latter gentleman, to withdraw his motion. The house then, at a quarter before nine o'clock, adjourned. HISTORY OF THE LANDED GENTRY.--II is calculated that the two volumes which are now published of Mr. Burke's History of the Commerce of Great Britain and Ireland, contdn accounts of about 800 eminent Families, and upwards of 20,000 individuals connected with them. This important work will therefore be found particularly valunble at the present moment, as showing the property, connexions, interest, and other characteristics of the Members of the New Parliament. It is' also interspersed with many very curio and interesting personal anecdotes, which renders it also ex tremely amusing. A boot-maker in Brussels is about to be married next week, under peculiar circumstances. He is only forty years of age, and has successively married three sisters, wi,o died within a few months of each other. After the death of the third sister he married a fourth wife, and he is now pry.: paring for si fifth, - - . - Last week, Mr. J. Solomon, of Lower Shorne, me t with his death under distressing circumstances. The son of Mr. Solomon having been married, he made one of the part. After the.cuuviviality of the day Mr. Solomon went to the door to bid the guests good night, and, in turning round to uo to the parlour, accidentally fell down the cellar stairs, and injured himself so much that he expired on Thursday last. Maidstone Ga:ette. Another of those extensive and mysterious robberies of jewels, &c., which have lately been so frequent at the west end of the town, was committed on Tuesday last at the rePl donee of the Dowager Lady Brownlow, No. 30, Hill -street, Berkeley-scluftre, it appears that on the oveningof the aber;, day, at 7 o'clock, her Ladyship's jewels, &c. were perfectly s a f e i n the various drawers wherein they were regularly depo sited, and that about half-past 9 o'clock, on Lady Brownlow entering her dressing_room, she discovered that several of the said drawers had.been unlooked, and that the whol e of the va luables in question were gone. The property, which is esti mated at between .5,009/. and 6,0004 value, consisted of dia mond necklace; brooches, rings, lockets, bracelet s , &c., is eases, together with en elegant gold watch and a writing desi: full of letters and other important papers, Information of the robbery was instantly communicated to the police, who are on the alert to•discover the perpetrators, A General in the Austrian service, of one of the most illustrious families of the country, had an only child, a natural daughter, of rare beauty and accomplishments. A SOPrtlt attachment was fnrinOti between the yUung lady aliti subaltern of of One of the reitiments quartered at Vienna. Consequences ensued which it would soon be impossible to conceal. The officer went to the General, made a confession. of the fault he had committed, and entreated Wile ''.;owed to repair it by marriage. The offended I "..rt over-hasty father I'.o B psrepptory refusal,' and declared that his daughter should be confined for life in a convent. On hymning this ter fll4P Ftlittli,ti9n; the unhappy Yawn 1 1 41, a At,Y , -1411- means to pro tium a quililty fig vlttielle acid, swallowed it, and destroyed herself. The miserable father became overwhelmed with grief and remorse, and calling the young officer to him, offered to make hirri reparation, for his cruel loss by adopting him as his son, and leaving him the whole of his property. ' The ritetl yottn g man rejected the nrnion§4 With Indignation, re tired to hiS lodgings, and blew his brains out. On 'Thursday afternoon, between three and four o'clock, the following melancholy and distressing accident tic. cuffed in the New-road, near to Trinity Church :—Miss Sam field, a yOni i g lady between ig and 20 years of age, the daugh ter of Edvvin Samfield, Esq., of Woburn-place,. Russell-square, was crossing the road, just at the instant that a gentleman's carriage was advancing in one direction towards her, and a pony phaeton, driven by a lady, in the opposite one. Mi ss igamtleld hastened to get out of the wa y , when, meat unfortu nately, her too in some mann e r caught the ground, and which causing her to stumble, she fell down with great violence, and rolled over in the direction the carriage was coming, and be fore the coachman could pull up, the horses had trampled over_ the unfortunate young lady, and one of the fore-wheels of the carriage pas s ed o v er h er r i g ht arm , crus hi ng t h e bone in a shocking manner. The wheel also went across her bosom to the left shoulder. The hind wheel would have followed in the same direction, but that the carriage was stopped by some 'persons seizi ng th e h orses ' h ea d s . Miss Samfield was raised up in a most dreadfully injured state, apparently lifeless, and the front part of her dress completely saturated with the blcxl which was profusely streaming from a frightful wound on her right cheek, caused by one of the horses treading on her face. Gerling, Esq., of Bronte-terrace, New North-road, Hornsey, to whom the carriage belongs, and who was in it at the time the accident occurred, instantly alighted, and e":- pressed the deepest concern at the melancholy catastrophe. The unfortunate sufferer was then placed in Mr. Gerling 's carriage, and conveyed to the surgery of Mr. Kinsey, of' Great Portland-street, where every possible attention was afforded her, and she was afterwards removed to her parent's residence. to whose party he had 'consented to ettneliThlin . srelf: After such an assertion fe;t it incumbent upan' . hirri to state, as brieili as t:o could, the motives that had 4ctuated him in the course he had pursued. He should• not, upon that. occasion allude to the seve ral topics contained in the address, and he felt that he coati abstain from doing so with perfect safety—not only because the sentiments he entertained with • respect to them were perfectly in accordance with those of the noble lord (Stanley) behind him, lus because he wes satisfied that neither the merits nor demerits of those topics entered at all into the consideration of the hon. gentlemen erso.. site, whose sole object had been to defeat the ministry. Whether sJet, a course was consistent with the dignity of any of. the members of t.,at house, it was not for him to determine. The honourable, member for. Middlesex had stated his belief that the co n tinuance of the present(hi. vernrnent in power would not be very long. He (Mr. Tennent) thought he was warranted in stating: his conviction that the grounds upon wh.ch the hon. member funded that opinion were not very correct. At all events, after the declarations that had been made •by the Chancellor of the Exchequer, the hon. member for Middlesex might rest assured, that however ready the right hon. baronet might be to bend to the indeps tr. rlently expressed opinion of the house, he never would give way to the capricious vdte of a faction. After having made a few observations upon the report of municipal refs no, the purport of which' our reporter could • not catch, the hon. gentleman proceeded to draw a parallel between the .existing state of things, and that which occurred upon the first, accession of Mr. Pitt to power, in 1782. In both instances, lie observed that the leader of the Opposition had allied self to a party—(Hear, 'hear)—whose opinions' were utterly at variance with his own, for the sake, if possible, of overwhelming the minister. In both instances the object was the same—in both instances the attempted mode of accomplishing it was the same, except that in 1793 Mr. Fox united with an Aristocratic party, whilst the noh'e lord (the member for Devonshire) sought, to obtain a temporary advantage over the party in power by calling to his aid the advocates et' pure tie. =Jersey. In both instances the al'iances had 'been unnatural. In the first it had lasted but for a short time; and in the present, if the King and the Minister exhibited the same firmness he believed it would re.n. time but little longer. When he looked at the means by which :he major ity on the Opposite side •of the hoUse had been procured, he could not regard it as representing the opinions of the country. He. could not suppose that those who had been returned to . Parliament by means of the grossest and most unparalleled intimidation, were the real repre sentatives of the feelings and opinions of the country. It was a mocke- - y to regard persons so returned as the representatives of any other party titan the ind.vidual under whose sanction they came forward. In Ire land every earthly means of coercion had been resorted to to bias the minds of the voters, and to compel them to vote in favour of the Candi. date nominated by a particular party in that country ; not only were endless tortures in the next world threatened, but in this that fate which is indicated by the death's-head and crossbones. lie (Mr. E. Tennent) certainly did not dispute the right which that house constitutionally possessed of commenting upon the manner in which ,the King might think proper to exercise the preco- ' gative of the Crown in the selection 'of his ministers ; but Le contended that if, by any factious influence, the house, without waiting to see what measures would be introduced, should succeed in defeating and displacing any Ministers that the King might choose, then he said that it would be transferring the executive authority from the Crown, where it was properly placed, to the House of Commons, where it could not properly remain. The authority of the ('rown would be reduced to less than a nullity ; the King would be a captive upon his Throne—the first slave in his kingdom. These were the sentiments that had restrained him from voting with the opponents to the present Ministry. But al. though he had supported the Government in the vote of the day before, he begged to say that, as a Reformer, he never could, and never would, give his support to any Administration that did not enter upon power with a determination to correct every acknowledged abuse. When he looked at the declarations made by the present Ministers, both with.ti and without the walls of Parliament, he thought he should be withhold_ holding from them that courtesy as Ministers which was due to them as gentlemen, if he did not say that at the present moment he believed them to be sincere. if the measures which they brought forward were in ar. cordance with the spirit of the declarations they had made, heshould gds e them'his honest, cordial, and conscientious support. Rut if he were deceived, either in their general policy or in any of the individual mea sures that they should introduce, there was no Member of that house who would give them a more determined opposition than he would, Mr. SPRING RICE rested the vote that he had given upon the question of the Address on the principles upon which he had alwapi acted, and which had been so well explained by his noble friend (Lord J. Russell). The able manner in which his noble friend in his speech of the other evening hail vindicated the line of conduct which he and those who ac• ed with him thought it their duty to pursue, more than Justified the confidence that he (Mr. S. Rice) had always been dis posed to place in him. Ile begged to state that his noble friend was not self.elected to the position which he occupied upon that (the Opposition) side of the house. He had been placed there by the approving voice of the whole Whig party.—(Hear, hear.) After the pointed and impressive manner in which his noble friend had contradicted the assertion that had been made, that a difference of opinion existed between him (Mr. S. Rice) and his noble friend, and ' a noble lord in another place, i e should not have felt it necessary to obtrude for a single moment upon the attention of the house, except that rumour had again given curren, y to a report that, notwithstanding his noble friend's direct contradiction. a difference of opinion did exist where, in point of fict, difference of opinion there was none. He (Mr. S. Rice) begged again emphatically to declare that amongst the members of the Melbourne Cabinet there was no such difference of opinion as had been stated--(Cheers.) And farther, not to deal with general expressions, but with a particular question, he begged to state that on the question of the Irish Church the plan laid down and explained in general terms by his noble friend met with the entire and perfect approval of himself (Mr. S. Rice) and his noble friend in the other house.—(Hear, hear.) Nut only did it meet with his (Mr. S. Rice's) approval, but he took the liberty of saying, and if the noble lord the member for Lan cashire was then in his place, he would ask bins whether he did not know that long before he (Mr. S. Rice) had the honour of being a mem. her of the late government, the very plan explained by the noble lord the member for Devonshire, last night, was a plan upon which he (Mr S. Rice) had uniformly expressed his disposition to act. Therefore, not only was it false to state that general differences had existed in the of , lbourne Cabinet ; but specially and particularly in the instance of Irish Church Reform there was the most perfect and entire concord.- 2 - (Hear, o ca a I He would not detain .the house further. He m ere l y wished to avail e first favourable opportunity to give a ta rect contradiction t self of tide the statements that had been put in circulati on . Whenever the subject igas brought forward in a specific shape, he should be pi epared to state in det,;.`. , what his views and opinions were. He was glad that the right hon. baronet the Chancellor of the Exchequer, had come to the determination of not d'sposing the report upon the address. The line of conduct that the right l: on. baronet had determined to adopt upon that subject was exactly what 119 (Mr. S. Rice) had expected from him. He thought it did the right hon. b.7ronet infinite credit, and Must be satisfactory to the house. Having discharged what he con ceivfti to be a duty to himself and to his two noble friends, by setting the hotue and the public right as to the alleged differeristes of opinion that had existed between them, he should not trespass upon the house 'at any greater length. He thought, after the course that the • right hon. baronet bad determined to take, it would be bad taste on the part of the house to prolong the discussion on that occasion. Sir M. W. RIDLEY pert, ctly agreed with the concluding observation of his right hon. - friend who had just sat down. He should think it very bad taste on his part if, after the long discussion that had taken place, lie should enter afresh upon the stage, and attempt to detain the house at any length upon the subject of the address or the amendment. But the personal imputation that had been cast upon him by the hon. meinly r fur Middlesex induced him to claim the indulgence of the house for a few moments, and a few moments only. Its the position that he:occin. pied as a public man, he (Sir M. W. Ridley) had nothing to look to but his public character ;- and he was not afraid to put the consistency of his public character, or the merits'Of his private character, in competi. tion with either the public or private character of the hon. member for Middlesex, who, in his peculiar manner, had thought proper to attack Lim (Sir R. W. Ridley) personally.—(Chcers.) The hon. member quoted from sonic newspaper an account of a meeting which was stated to have taken place at the house of the noble lord the member for Lancashire. The very first part of that account, which described Lord Arthur Len nox as being present at the meeting, was false and unfounded, for Lord -Arthur Lennox was at that moment in Scotland. As far as it related to himself, he (Sir M. W. Ridley) was bound to say that he did attend the meeting held at the house of his noble friend the member for Lance. shire ; and he was proud to say farther, that he fully acquiesced in the opinions his noble friend entertained upon all general subjects of re form; and he would tell• the bon, member for Middlesex, although he (Sir M. W. Ridley) and his noble friend, and those who thought with him, were not prepared to sweat that black was white—(loud cheers) — although they were not prepared to say one thing one day, and to vote another the next—although they did not attempt to gain a temporary popularity by truckling to popular passion, they were prepared to go oie as honestly. and as conscientiously in the reform, not only of alleged abuses, but of every thing that was found to operate prejudicial:7 to the institutions of the country, as the hon. member himself. lie (Sir M. W. Ridley) should not be afraid ofeinking in the scale of po pular opinion by contrasting the line of conduct which he and his friends should pursue with the line of conduct that might be adopted by the lion. member for Middlesex. Tht hon. member stated that, twenty years ago, when he (Sir M. W. Ridley) acted with him, in preparing lists of the House of Commons, he always thought that he (Sir M. W. R.) tves not a stanch Whig; and that, at the present moment, he did not know what to call him. He would relieve the hon. member from his difficulty—he would tell him what he was. From the first moment that he had been introduced to public life, he had continued to he a sin cere,:nd constitutional tiv hig—(hear, hear)—and as sincere a Reformer as the hon. member for Middlesex, or any other member of the house.— (Hear, hear.) :seath , e was not ono of those who blindly tollo%v the boo. member for Middl es e x -.hen he saw that hen, member lending himself .mina the character of ap independent re to everything that was unbea. , Ad not followed the steps or ileFol7:e presentative.—(Hear, hear.) He ' 4 le.ez.—(Cheers.) Although one of the tail of the hon. member for Mit._ clown the anitnadver. the hon member might seek popularity by to denorni sions of the house against those whom he had been plea. • • kt. nate the tail of the noble lord the member for Lancashire, lie (Sir . Ridley), for one, should look upon such conduct (he did not wish to use the word offensively) with the contempt it deserved.—(Ciu era.) He felt satisfied that no other member of the house, in diseessing a great con.ti. tutional question, would have descended to such petty and unworthy pet sOnalities, as had disgraced the speech of the hon. member for Middle sex.—(Hear, hear.) As to the general question of the address, he would simply observe, that his object, in the course he had pursued, *as not to vote anything whatever that might tend immediately to turn out the right honourable baronet and his colleagues from the Go vettnneot. That being the case, he thought it more consistent with duty, and more consistent with his principles, to give a direct and decided vote upon the question than to seek to shelter himself under the pretext, that although the right hon. baronet might be left in a minority, he would not r. tire from the situation that he held. In pursuing th e t course he. had consulted no personal feeling, no personal interest; he had adopted it simply because he thought it the most straightforward and the mat manly—(hear, hear)—and having adopted it. Ile was not - • - - - afraid to leave his constituent:, or the people of England generally, to form their own conclusions as to his conduct, or the motives that had in- ilnenced it—(hear, hear.) He umderstood than another report had been circulated that he (Sir M. W. Ridley) bad somewhere or other coaanu nicated to some one, that the right hon. baronet the' Chancellor of the Exchequer did not intend to take the sense of the house upon the pre. sent occasion; and farther, that. he had commtinicated to the Govern ment, that in case of a division he should not oppose them, because he thought the opposition was factious. In answer to that report, he bepe I to state, in reference to the first part of it, that he had had no comma. nicatien whatever with the government; and in reference to the first part of it, he could only say that all the intercourse he had had with any one upon the s'ubje:t was with a friend whom he met in the street that day, and who asked him what turn he supposed the debate would take. In reply to that question he (S:r M. W. Ridley) stated that r•e did not know, but that as far as he was concerned, if the right hon. ba ronet should think fit to take the sense of the house, he thought' he would be sitting a very unwise and unworthy part, for that the opinion of the house having been fairly expressed Cie night before, he considered it the duty of the right hon. baronet to yield to that vote; and if he took - a different course, he (Sir M. W. Ridley) should certainly vi.te against hint--,(Qeers.) Mr. F. O'CONOIt said that the Irish members who had tendered their adherence to the opposition patty in the house had been chargvd with having given themselves up to de - hon. and learned member ills Dublin, to be dealt with as he might think proper. He had :not heard from that hon. and learned gentleman, who was justly considered as the. able friend and advocate of the interests of his countrymen, anything !.alf so assuming and ar:ogant as what fell from the noble lord the inerner for Lancashir, who spoke of himself as being at the head of a compact army of observation over the proceedings of the house. Although the Irish members with whom he (Mr. F. O'Connor) acted had given their adherence to the opposition now formed, they were not open to the charge of a pliancy of principle, or of compromising their opinions in any shape, He recollected reading an extract from a speech once deivered 1)3 the praise. He said enolig sayi g that he did not place corn.,,, in the preient Gave&wont Th► hnn. Baronet would prove measure, of reform promised by the sigh'. most unsatisfactory to the country. If, therefore, e— s%ntiments, he could•have separated the amendment frord the 4(1 ' 1 ' 6 ' 5r., 1 he 44 oul.i hay, voted for it. But as it was, he thought himself eitit4" (3 look at the concomitant circumstances. Ile could not 'shut hit eyvi t.: the fact, that the probable result of the success tf the Amendment would be to drive, prematurely, from power, an admiMstration incompa bly preferable to their expected successors. He could not but look with alarm at the prospect of men with such opinions as the honourable member for London and the hen. member for BritipOrt succeeding to the powers of Government in this country; and he had teartosily And c , ,nscienticusly done his duty xgainst the Amendment. The ai. pointment of such men would carry dismay and doOlation into the heart@ of the people of England. 'lt would announce the tie- struction of that nice eq . uii,olse of the constitution so much boasted by politicians. It would announce to the agriculturiSts the abolition or the corn-laws ; to the possessors of wealth it would bespeak the destrun. tints of all the safeguards of property. The fundho:der would anticipate from such an event an issue that might be very agreeable to the I , on. member of Oldham (Mr. Cobbett)—the equitable adjustment of the tia- tional debt. With such anticipations, was he not entitled,, nay bound, to vote as he had done, against the amendment to the address, the yr.. dency of Which Ainendment was, in his opinian, to bring about tho re. tiremeut of the present ministers to make way for others of a character dangetous to the peace of the country, the security of property, and Alie maintenance of all our cherished institutions ? He Ind acted in, ltis manner upon the same principles that guided h conduct in private life; and he did not understand why he was to alter his course in obe dience toParliamentary precedent. He was sure that he should be.sub. • jected to all kinds of imputations upon his motives, in consequence of this avowal of his opinions. He should, however, boldly withstand such attacks, and steadily persevere promoting the success of those princi. ciples which he had formed in his boyhood, confirmed in his riper years, and which he never ceased to cherish. Mr. HUME explained. He had merely stated of the hon. member that he was a member of Lord Stanley's committee. If he was not, then he (Mr. Hume) had misrepresented the hon. member. If, • on the oth,r hand, he was a member of that committee, he knew not what grbitad of complaint there could be against him (Mr. Hume.) Mr. • YOVNG said he was not in the house when the allusion was made, but he hall been informed that the hon. gentleman had repr.,- sented him as a wolf in sheep's clothing. " Mr. HUME denied having spoken of the hon. member as a Noll is sheep's clothing. He merely represented him as one of that sect, of opposition Puritans who imputed factious motives to those who voted upon his side of tie house. Colonel EVANS, in a tone of voice which was inaudible owing to the ation. //, ' • DUBLIN. . , . (FROM OUR OWN CORRILSPDXDENT..) A vexatious and harrasing system of persecution is carried' on'agains: these farmers who ventured to support the eand'dates whom they pi ferred at the late election. Not only are they compelled, without anv notice, to pay up the arrear of rent, caned the ha - aging gale ; but the most vindictive law proceedings have been instituted for no other pose than to take them by surprise, and distress them with heavy cats in addition to their det t. The Irerford In-dependent describes a method which hats been adopted on an estate in Wexford fur the purpose bringing refractory tenants to a recollection of what they owe to "natural protectors." It is a lamentable exhibition of the meaur ss to which Tory vengeance will stoop for the satisfaction of slightei l. sau th o . tority and offended pride. . _ d !The trustees of the Mountnotris estate are Mean!. Coekborn and Hall, bankers, London, whose agent here ,is Mr. John ' 7 .4asuott, Ix. t her of Mr. William Gfascott, the assessor at ourlate election. IVlr.,Glascret has thought proper, in the name of Messrs. Cockburn and'Hall, to issue latitats against several of the tenants on the estate for what is called the back half-year's rent o:• running gale, which has, time innuemorial, been allowed to stand over to each succeeding rent-day. Many of those WI i ts are issued tbr trifling sours under 6/. ; each wr t superinducing an ex pease of 21. 6d., which is scrupulously demanded with the rent from the unfortunate tenant. There is one feature In the proceeding which we can scarcely command temper to relate; but it carries i:s own corn mentary along with it. Several of those tenants, whose back gale wt, unpaid, apprehending that they would be treated in a similar manner to that we have related, for having given their eadScient!ous vote to the Candidates of their choice, repaired to the office. of Mr. Glassecet, in Catmint, fort the purpose of paying off the back gale. Were it not that we have authentic, and, if necessary, sworn evidence of the fact, we cauld not believe what followed. On repairing to the office in question, and having stated that their object was to pay up their rent arrears, they were-received by a inan named --, who .is.tuider the character of clerk to this humane agent, but who told them that It was not convenient at that time for Mr. G!aseott to be seen. They went home and returned the fol:owing day, in order again to get an opportunity of pay. ing their rents ; but before they succeeded in seeing " His Honour," one William Phillips, the driver of the estate, served them with copies of the writs, which were in the mean time issued 3 ,pinst them Then, and . not till after the service: had been efLeted, did this Jackal' permit ti.e unfortunate tenants to approach the agent, who refused to receive the rents, unless the provision made for the Attorney, '2l. 2s. on each latitat, was discharged. This is a case for the consideration of those who mouth aleuci about the base ingratitude of Irish tenants. I believe it is f,i7 rpm being a solitary instance of the utter uontempt for popular right, and for thespirit of the British Constitution, with which Toryptopriterrs.a.-: . still more recklessly their underlings, prosecute their rev% ge against all who have dared to cross .the designs of that vila faction upon the liberty and hairpin: ss of mankind. If sein,_• honourable mom be: would move for a return cf the number et I:rtitats issued in Ireland since the commerg4peu! of this year, distinguishing the numbers in 400 ttraPiretiVe trounties, and compare it with the number of similar writs issued last year, or c>oinpare• in this list the number of writs issued in counties of which the representation was con tested, with these where there had not been any opposition, the public might then judge of the extent to which this spccEes of oppression is car ried on, and of the heavy sacrifices which the Irish farruer is obliged to snake for the independent exercise of the eir?ctiVe Itanehlse. They talk ofpriests end prie.stergft klut pit that evi: alongside of agents and at torneyeraft, god let the wood judge which is the worst. They are both bad enough ; but there can be no question that one land agent, who acts as the Wa,terford kflepeadent represents this Mr. Glascott to have acted, is more noxious to the general peace, than twenty priests armed with bell, book, and candle. r rilE SUN EXPRESS. TO THE EDITOR OF THE SUN. Sm.—Your valuable paper (by Express), reached us this afternoon, some hours before we could possibly have heard by any other channel— thanks to you for your usual exertions where the people areconcerncd— announcing thw Second Glorious Victory, gained by a Reformed House of Commons, upon the question in answer to the King's Speech to the Commons. The result was most anxiously looked for here, and on its arrival spread universal satisfaction, except to the band of pensioners, half-pay officers, &c., who so numerousiy surround our town ; and we should have evinced our feeling in the only way we in country towns can do by a merry peal in our parish bells, but it appears those who have . the controul of our venerable church refused to allow that universal de. monstration, for on application to the Churchwardens, Messrs. Leese and Douse, they objected to the bells being rung on the occasion ; the latter warden, however, said if his brother warden and the minister had no objection, he had not. The Reformers, in hopes of propitiating the objecting gentlemen, to grant their views, presented to the Vi ar a list of names, requesting that the bells should be rung. A refusal was the result—when, if a sailor and his lass had been spliced in the morning, the bells would have been permitted to have sounded " as merry a peal as ever greeted human ears." Had the result of the debate been dif ferent to what it is, no doubt but it would have been otherwise. This is the opinion of a Subscriber and Reformer, Portsmouth, Feb. 27, 1835. VERITAS. (From the Coventry Herald of Ft iday.) Too much praise cannot be given to the spirited conductors or The Sun, for their indefatigable exertions, regardless of trouble and expense, to furnish the earliest information to their subscrtb2rs, of which this is the second instance in the present week of expresses from The Sun arriving at our office. (From the Northdmpton Mercury of Saturday.) An express from The Sun Office, with a full report of the debate of Thursday night, reached us yesterday morning, so early as ten o'clock. We understand it is the intention of the Proprietors of The Sun, to supply their subscribers who reside in the vicinity cf the town s i n th e great lines of roads with E x p ress Editi ons on all important occasions. (From the Bath Herald of Friday.) SECOND EDITION.—We stop the press to announce that we have just received (five o'clock p. m.) by express, from the s:airsit.tedolPwro,p;c: e c ti ) , t r . of The Sun newspaper, the woole of th e d e b ate, and the divisio,n, o f the House, which took place this morning a t 20 m i nutes The amendment to the address was carried against 'Ministers by a rna jority of seven. (From the Stockport Advertiser of Thursday.) Tue Scat Peres.—The public are materially indebted to the public spirit and lite•rality of the proprietor of this Paper for the extraorninary quickness with which the news of the choice of SpZaker was conveyed to this town. In 15 hours after the division had taken place, Mr. Young did us the favour to leave a copy of The San at our office, which enabled us to anticipate by so many hours all the London Press.—Such zeal and industry surely deserves a corresponding encouragement on the part of the public. 4 , (From the Ozford University Herald of Saturday.) The Sun newspaper, containing the account of the termination of the debate, at 4 the division, was received in this city at noon on Friday The editor of this paper has promised equal despatch on all interesting oc casions. We hope such attention to the public will have its reward. (Erom the Jackton's Orford Journal of Wednesday.) EXTRAORDINARY ExEaTioNs or THE PULIC PRESS.. —The San news paper of yesterday, containing nearly seventeen columns of the debates of Thursday evening, reached Oxford by twelve o'clock on Friday morn. ing. When it is considered that the debate In the Commons was net finished till nearly two o'clock that looming, the exertions made in printing and conveying the Riser such a distance in so short a time must astonish every one, particularly all who are aware of the nature and din. ficulty of getting up a newspaper. We understand that the liberal pro. prietors of The Sun intend forwarding express editions of that paper to such Of their country correspondents who reside in the vicinity of great towns, on allimportant occasions. (From the Glasgow Chronicle of Monday.) For several years-we have had the pleasure of acknowledging the in. defatigable and unrivalled exertions of the London Sun newspaper, in supplying all the principal cities of the kingdom with early and copious rep:•rts of the proceedings iti Parliament, on every occasion of national impertoug, cltitur by the regular London Mail, or by express if re. quirod, Never was this praiseworthy industry and activity better dis played or more fully appreciated by the public, than on the all.engrossing question of the Speakership, when, although the House or Commons did not adjourn till half-past six o'clock, the whole debate was given a: great length, and dispatched atter the regular mail. We are sure that the thaalrits al the public of the west of Scotland, who were waiting with such anxiety f..r the result, are most cordially awarded to the spirited conductors of The Sun. (From the Doncaster Gazette of Friday.) EXTRAORDINARY DISPATCH.—To Mr. Young, the spirited proprietor of The Sun newspaper, the highest praise is due for his•unwearieci ext r.. tions in conveying through the provinces important political intelli gence, so rapid as to leave the mars far behind. Mr. Wiley, of Sheffield, received copies of The Sun, containing the debate on the election of Speaker, at eleven o'clock on Friday forenoon, Mr. Wiley immediately proceeded to Leeds; and reached that teem betbre half-past one. This dispatch in the conveyance of iitinAftatit intelligence is unprecedented; and cannot fail to be duly appreciated. The 'Wednesday's express, con taining the King's speech, proved unfortunately a failure, owing to some fault on the road. The papers did not reach Newark before 45 minutes past nine. They were thence expressed by Mr. Wiley to Sheffield, in two hours and forty minutes, arriving at Sheffield a few .minutes before twelve. They shouid have arrived at a quarter before eight. As the Wellington coach arrives at Newark at five atan , the papers were sent off express after that cJac:). The copy of The Sun for this office, instead of coming by the Wellington, reaching Doncaster soon after nine in the morning, was put into the post - oifice, at Grant. ham, and of course came by the mail at one o'clock. (From the Nottingham Reokts of Friday.) Tue DIVISION ON THE SPEAKERSIIIP.--.• rOr some tid e opening of Parliarnetlt, great CZCI" interest was previous to the e 7 d in regard to the elec tion to t 4 Mir of the House of ComP7oes, and betting was going for. ward to greater extent in Nutttigham, than we ever remember on arty previous political event. -• ' The Tories expressed the utmost confidence; and freely be odds, in some Instances as high as Et• to I, .and we " 41 ' rd that 50 to 5 was offered. But they hell reckoned without their hosts, for soon after half-past seven on Friday morning, an express from The Sun newspaper office passed through, conveying intelligence that Mr. Abercrombie was elected by a majority often, the news spreal with the utmost rapidity, and appeared to cause universal joy among the Reformers, while the Tories seemed completely astounded ; they con. fessed thetas:elves totally unprepared for such a result. We were en. ablest to print a second edition of that morning's . Review, f.r a consi. derable portion of our town subscribers, long before the arrival of the regular • mail. The extraordinary exertio,.s of the spirited propric. tors of The Sun newspaper, in preparing in the first place more than six columns of the debates. and then in despatching them by sp. lal messengers, so as to reach Nottingham, a distance of 125 miles, in twelve hours, are worthy of the highest commendations, and we hereby offer our grateful ecknowlcdgmmts for the early information we bare received on this and on many previous occasions, from the conductors of that enterprising Journal. From the state of the roads, and the inch?. money of the night; the mail was fully an hoar past itp time in arriving, and The Sun Express thus anticipated the post by two hours and a half! Soon after noon on Friday, the express reached Manchesttr, whence it was• instantly conveyed by the rail-road to Liverpool, thence telegraphed in five minutes to Holyhead, and a steam packet imme. diately sailed for Dublin; at midnight it arrived there, but the incle mency of •the weather prevented landing, and the news was male known by signals! The result was known in Edinburgh and Glasgow, four hundred miles distant, early on Saturday, morning, and it is stated it was known in Paris early on Friday by telegraph. BURGLARY IN KING -STREET, CIIEAPSIDE.- The premises of Messrs. John and Sydney Stith, No. 3, King-street, Cheapside, and No. 31, Ironmonger-late, were entered by means of picklock keys on Sunday last, between the hours of 12 in the day and S in the evening, and plundered of silk-waistcoating and other goods to the amount of 5001. The thieves had entered at the street-door of the dwelling-house in King-street, and broken open the warehouse in Ironmonger lane. They also had broken open the desks and other deposi tocies of property, but they missed the iron safe, where a good deal of case was kept. All the money they got hold of could not have amounted to more than 21. It is evident that they were disturbed in their work, for they had left behind them upwards of 1,000/. in goods packed up. A crow-bar, a dark lantern, and a pocket-handkerchief, which no doubt belonged to one of the thieves, were found upon the premises. A re ward of 1001. has been offered for the apprehension and con viction of the offenders., j 7 1 - c // / / .. LITERATURE. GA UNTLETT'S SERMONS. T . Seeley and Burnside. London. 1 835. • hese sermons are the productions of the late .car of Olney, Bucks--a spot memorable as being the abode of the poet Cowper —and are introduced a memoir of the author, which is written with much feeling and propriety. The Sermons themselves need no recommendation. They are characterized throughout by a tolerant and-impassioriate spirit of piety, and need only to be read to be admired. At the close of the volumes, many curious letters of the poet. Cowper are introduced' in the form of an appendix, which prove beyond doubt that the author of the " Task " was, if not quite mad, at least in a condition,•for upwards 0.1" thirty years, cle.4 ly bordering on it. Such lettera as; are here for the first time, we believe, - publish e 4 we never read.. They show not only a'disordered state of mind, but one amounting to • absolute inribnility, .A s literary curiosities they are unrivalled. Housseani• ila his most perverse state of hallucination, neverde‘:e• loped such a pitiable weakness of intellect as Cowper here displays. 'lt is impossible, notwithstandi ng the admiration we feel for the poet of the " Task," to look on his emasculated mind with other feelings than those of contemptuous commiseration. He had none of the energy of man--none of the meek forbearance a woman. He had not spirit ("bough to be an enthu siast, but was a poor, P7azy, mixture of doubt, dam,_ pair, and I "t° l cvnice. His heart was sound, but his in 'a4-r; perpetually leading him astray. We Sub join a few of the most characteristic of Cowper's epistles. In the first he alludes, it Will be perceived, to a vision of a wine-glass, which Sheridan would have interpreted in a more social and inspiriting way than the Calvinist of Olney : " DEAR Stn—My time since I wrote last has passed quietly, except the night before !ant and yesterday. That night vas a night of dis tressing experiences, and the day was consequemly a melancholy one. This morning I tun in rather a more cheerful frame of mind than usual, haying had two notices of a more 'comfortable cast than the generality amine. I waked, saying— I shall perish, which was immediately answered by a vision of a wineglass, and thee words— A whole glass. In allusion, lib doubt, to the famous story of Mrs. Honeywood. " Soon after, I heard these— ' I see in this case just occasion of pity.' " I am sorry that Mr. Killingworth is so painfully indisposed, for I know that an interruption of his industry can be ill afforded. But you comfort may be, that the Lord knows it too. Mr. Courtenay spoke to me the other day about his binding, and was perfectly satisfied with it, but he thought him long in finishing. " Our friends leave us on Friday. May the new year be a more pro. pi!iotis year to us all, than' its predecessor. God grant it! Amen. " Mrs. Unpin is much as usual, and joins me in hind remembrance.. Nye have received our annual remittance from the secret benefactor to the indigent —I am yours siixerely, " Jan. I, 1793. " AL CO WPE R.` " DEAR SIR—It is with great unwillingness that I write, knowing that I can say nothing but what will distress ycu. I despair of every thing, anti my d:spair is pert', ct, because it is founded oil a persuasion. that there is no effectual help far me, even in God. " From four this morning till after seven I lay meditating terror, sue, terrors as no language can express, and as no heart, I am sure, but mine ever knew. My very finger ends tingled with it, as indeed they ofte., tie. I thea slept and dreamed a long dream, in which I told Mrs. U., with many tears, that my salvation is impossible, for the reason given above. I recapitulated in the most impassioned accent and manner, the unexampled severity of God's dealings with me in the course of the last twenty years, especially in the year 73, and again in 81, and concluded all with observing that I must infallibly perish, and that the Scripture's which speak of the insufficiency of man to save himself can never be derstood unless I perish. " I then made a sudden transition in my dream to one of the public streets in London, where 1 was met by a dray ; the fure.).„, of t h e team carat:full against me, and in vio:ent anger I clatrat'd the draymsti for it. " Such are my nocturnal experiences, anal ;CP . ; daily ones are little better. I know that I have muei lever, but 1' is no cure, and is as much the afflictive ' ,and of God upon me as a n y a fever for which th ere other circumstance of m y distress. " I thank you for your two la • Delay is no denial indeed, but in extrerniti,s such as mine it t s very severe and hard to bear. ' I am, dear Sir, yours sincerely, '• Feb. 2, 179;3 " WM C." AND STORIES, BY A CLERGYMAN DEB7'. Written during his Confinement in the Debtors' Prisons. 3. Vols. London :A. IL Bailey and Co. 1835. . - Most earnestly do we recommend the perusal--the care ful perusal—of this work to the members of - the British Legislature. It is worth 114 volumes of abstract treatises on the evils of the present laws of debtor and creditors triumphant refutation of every argument that has ever been offered in favour of the demoralizing, heart-rending systent of imprisonment for debt. The scenes are represented with surprising vigour and faithfulness ; the descriptions vivid, full of truth, and occasionally powerful ; and the illustra tions and episodes, pictures drawn from real incideilts of real life. Some of the episodes are full of pathos— more so an .hundred times than any which ha - ve ever been supplied by a fertile and inventive inwgination. The history of poor unfortunate Mrs. Ge'rdon—the touching account of the young clergyman who committed suicide— and the death of th e unhappY south, a scholar of West minster, imprisoned for discharging a cracker through a Jew's window—the author's story, and many others, all posi tive facts, are without parallel in the best works of fiction, All the events, however, are not of ; : his serious description. Some of the anecdotes related are worthy of Foote, others would do credit to the genius of Garrick, and Dr. Wolcott has written verses which would not suffer by a comparison . with come of the stanzas chorussed in the tape-shops of the King's Bench. That this work will become popular we trust—that it ought to become so we are most firmly persuaded —not that we agree with the author in every opinion he expresses ; neither can we approve of the want of taste, and occasionally of goof). feeling, which has led him to speak disrespectfully of public men to wboni he is opposed on political grounds. It has been observed that too much suffering hardens the heart, and blunts the better feelings of our common nature ; and certainly there seems a confirmation of it, in the fact, that a gentleman who, from bitter experience of the demo ralizing effects of imprisonment for debt, e:sposes the horrors of that abominable system, can reconcile it to his conscience to repudiate the emancipation of the Irish Catholics from a state of bondage more degrading than even perpetual in carceration. Neither do we hold with the author's con viction, that the improvement of the laws of debtor and creditor, and the abolishing altogether of imprisonment for debt, are all that are required to perfect the- civil and judi cial code of this country. But these questions arc not now under consideration. Our present business is with the general tenor of a work calculated to render infinite service to the cause of justice and humanity, and well deserving the patronage of every enlightened member of the community. We shall be glad to hear of its extended circulation ; and we can assure our readers that there is not one of them who will not be amused, instructed, and affected by its perusal. We shall frequently have occasion to give extracts from its pages; we, therefore, in the present crowded state of our columns, must confine ourselves to the following extract from the second volume, exposing the system of victimising, which is constantly being, carried on in London by swindling attornies and their nefarious agents : "This, then, was thus described to Motfurd. Supplse a private individual anxious to disccunt a Lill, which, not being mercantile, he• could not get cashmt through the medium of a city brok, r. He is re commended to a person residing in some city Square—a Methodist par son, perhaps (we could adduce a notorious case in point), who wilt do it for him; or he is, as is still oftener the case, referred to the parson', agent, who is aPowed so much by hi• employerfor getting the bill, and so . muds by the gentleman for cashing it. The money is given —say 35/. for a 401 bill—with the understanding that if the geatle•nan should short' when it becomes due, it can be renewed. This intimation is invariably given when the party is known to have money, in order to excite a carelessuess,as to the taking up of the bill, and,, if possible, to, ,prevent its being paid to the moment. Well, the . gentleman departs. with his money, and the agent flies off to the parson with the bilk The parson at once hands it over to Jos. ltussel: The well-trained and wea.traiMog Jos., who may be in prison or not, as he fled; it tosuit his purpose, has always a gang of desperate rogues, some in, and same out, of jail, but all connected with the debtors' prisons, in his pay. His first step, then, on receiving the bill, is to endorse it himself; his next, to-re, pair to these precious confederates, to whom he pays one or two ab'sl. hags earls to write their names on the back of the bill, upon the mum standing that, if at large, they arc to be arrested; if hi jail, to be, a erved with common writs. In this manner, Jos. procures sixteen oc twenty endorsements to the bill; the more the merrier for Jos. " The bill runs its time, and becomes ,te. The gentleman, careless, as was expected and intended, is not at home when it is presented, and perhaps calls in a couple of days afterwards to take it up. The method* parson h• s not got it, indeed it is at his attorney's, but if the gentleman will call to-morrow, he can take it up; at the same time, he believes there are two or three pounds casts upon it, which he had better be pro. pared to pay. " The gentleman accordingly calls the next day; sheriff's officers ant in waiting for him, and he is arrested. He is taken to a spunging-house, and there, for the first time, he is astounded at the use that has tsjeu rnade of the int, rval of time between the day when the bill became tins, and the day when the msney was tendered. He finds that it has been endorsed by some twenty persons, and that; in that interval, the whole- of the twenty have writs issued against them, at a cost of three pounds each ; thus leaving his debt at it. original amount of forty wa n d s, - a& his costs at a trifle more than sixty pounds It is well, tlti* :ii he.himr ~~i~