The Sun. — London, England, 1835-03-13 00:00:00

..____ SHIPPING --(THIS DAY.) (FROM LLOYD'S.) 8 DP -AL, MARCH 12 —Wind S.W., squally. Arrived the Eliza i‘f.ott, Smith, from the Mediterranean ; Aldred, Murphy, from St. .iehael'a ; Bee, Ward, from Barflew ; Sterling, Paulin, from the i;horiver Gambia. The Hope, Brewer, for Cape Coast Castle, lost tro..anciady.cable yesterday, and has been supplied with others from The whole of the outward-bound remain all well. I'ORSMOUTH, MARCH 1 0 .—A gale all day from Sato W. _l.l-I.touTH MARCH 11.—Wind S.W. to N.W. LlitarAtsfotrru, MARCH 11.—Wind S.W. to W., fresh gales and llY• Arrived the Plover packet, from Heligoland; his Ma .-T*7s;s ship Scorpion from Lisbon ; and 13etsey, Hunter, from Val • Off port the Adah, Martin, from Port-au-Prince. RAAtsAr, MARCH 11 . —Arrived ff port the George the Fourth, o rr f .. beadeetliz4o..,:cms;aol:7e.merara, very leaky, and main-mast sprung, having nr u n m A it cII 12 . —Arrived off port the Swift, Way, from 11.1)evER, MARCH 11 .—Arrive(1 off port the Henrietta. Klasina, -er r' 13 atav' a uallsi,LnEloalPidlisVolnu,nfrr,oraMDAieticnietralrla..—Arrived off port the Margaret Sy from 11°-uthlras, AwliAthß.Cd rt am l a l g . e — . Arrived off port the Herald, —, from Liv t ar b, a E ßPooL, MA Rcli 11 . —Arrived the Cheshire, Campbell,h The Sir A nd ""°es• Off Port the Waverly, Phillip, from Mobile. 1 6t1 1 (‘ ;‘ sen ' from Quebec to this port , which was abandoned the Itu„s-L'eember, in long. 24, was driven on shore on the Mond of ea pti ::;: t w p e o n rtt. to pieces —most part , of the cargo saved, but much . U a ed; a large cask of palm oil, marked B 450, has been picked frolots_t../,..lo,hAnl,s,,,,Ncieivc.lo.r—un.sknrricive.d the Westmoreland, Bennett, B kAT x,ofoRCH 10 . —Arrived the Hindlev, Stevens, from Laguna. ff th e 4ttGATE, MARCH 12.—The Lord Nelson, Cony, was got o p l. ti n this morning, with trifling damage. Nrcio t4 " T it, MARCH 11.—Arrived the Lapwing packet, from , w eath I th, after being out five days, and experiencing tremendous el., h oilr,tl to Brazil. wa Th G l t i e riv , e'age the Fourth, Green, from Liverpool to St. Michael's, the 7 0f , in taunpon the roc k s at the entrance of Douglas harbour on t, and received considera st ble damaiTe. itit g . 1 17 ttirriet, Williamso n , from Boon .to London, was t owe d ou:tooth. 44RIVALS AND DEPARTURES AT THE N A ,. ~ , SCOTCH WHARFS. 40 0 ,, „ 14 S .‘ Haar, Ma acu 12.—N0 arrivals. Sailed this for f e , - shi re , Tile Kirkcaldy and London Shipping Company's smack Fi i o - f Isereita_4Tes Grant master, for Kirkcaldy, with a general cargo ii - til k ,',,dise. Adviee.—The Dundee, Perth, and London . S f l p i,CVanys smack Courier, W. Mills master, sailed rom i t, , for Lndon, with a general cargo, chiefly linens, o 9 C o , sl 'ne Bth inst. ; the Dundee, Perth, and London S ungShipp 4111any's powerful steam-ship Dundee, John Wishart Com tenge, sr, was to sail from Dundee with a considerable number of r; and a most extensive cargo, on Wednesday at noon. tiolotderstand the great success - which has attended the introduc tested ,Bitaeata navigation betwixt Dundee and London, has sug . - Pow„ f le. n ecessity of having another steam-ship of still more and t}lll thinensions, in ° orderr to give every facilit to chiDiedtothis bright er " Ornament of the Seas" will be bui p lt pers and unde — " a scale of unequalled magnificence and grandeur . . We Ah:ifecins determined to keep the lead in steam enterprisc. e ctth ern B ,°°ll have occasion to make a comparison with one or two kare stars." —Our best wishes are, that they may equal their ,D :,,,lithern compeers. Comp nd' Macm ived this morning, the Swa'l`ll,tud London' Shipping Company's smack Lark, Richard Kith „,„, as ter ; and London John Swain master, from Bridport, ndor,e,r,al cargoes. Sailed this forenoon, the Inverness and , I' r 'T"'Pl'ing Company's smack, London, J. M'Kenzie mas adi `nyeruess, with a general cargo of merchandise. No %i 4 1 ,41 411;ZQVIIARB. MAacx I2.—Arrived this forenoon the " s de ti h.,..,lllletica master, from Aamouth, with a general cargo. 17tures or advises. hi tht Ithßies WHARF, MARCH 12.—N0 arrivals. Sailed last Perio; te Aberdeen and London Shipping Company's smack Su ,,°;t ra re ' "h°llll Donald master, for Aberdeen, with a general cargo ' 1 ;Co -Incli se• Advices. The Edinburgh and London Ship di=e n'PanY's smack, Earl of Hopetoun, David Millar master, V' 4 ,,ze, „'lt,..l..eith from London, with a general cargo of merchan lippiLalcnday the 9th instant. The Aberdeen and London '44.148 C°4l Pan ' Y's mack Trium . ph, John Leslie master, sailed ethil;3/4berdeen f or - Lon s don, with a general cargo, on Sunday, the D Lrv s or 4 A! AND ST. A NDREW ' S WHARF MARCH 12.—N0 ar ;' ktrivley ar tures. Advice.—The Thames, David Nichol Inas "kli %rel. ' .at Grangemouth, from London, with a general cargo dise, on Monday, the 9th inst. EAST INDIA SHIPPING. ii ° v• 6 11 ",.. A BATAVIA.—The Zeno, Oct. '27, and Fejec, Diem, Il el l en ° Ps Liverpool ; the Singapore, frem Portsmouth, 18th ; At w, 'sr, from Mauritius, 16th; the Edward, from Van 20 t h L iI I 4IV N 4 LS FROM eittN - A.—The Hive, from Sourabaya, Oct. n' l 4: '' r na, Madras, and Jean, 19th, from Samarang ; the 4 1 .eatr, 4 % a4 ., A.linerva, from London, 24th • the Layton, from O L s, f ro Le , r the Louisa Campbell, from ' Madras, 25th ; the 4i:a Calcutta, 28th. .i 74 eh ; ALS PROM MADRAS.—His Majesty's ship Andromache, Nth; the and Singapore, Nov. 19Fanny, from Negopatam, Osllth, Z Resource, from Penang, Doc. 2 ; the Africa, from Cal -10;'n; the Enterprise, from Trincomalee, 10th, and sailed bsave.„. - alcutt a ; the Africaine, from Masulipatam, 10th ; the ``klig s ,7: Castle, from Point Pedro, 1 lth ; the George, from . I .)sp Ait 1 2th. thftls audio ES trawl MADRAS.—The Prince George, for the a),k•elidon, Nov. 23 ; the Fanny, for Masulipatam, Dec. 2; LAsAzms, for Colombo and England, Oct. 23. s y ' 1\10: BENGAL.—The Quebec Trader, from Born %Nor; la the Lawrence, from Liverpool, and Sophia, from Islo x t'ait t ) "c 1 ; the St. George, from Bristol, 28th. 4 -11 % BENGAL —The Exmouth, for London, 4 1 , PROM . 1' the Fatim a , for Liverpool, 20th ; the Eamont, for Ran a, .tx tv kue LS ko „ f BosinAT.—The Annandale, from —, Nov. ; " t ° , De' r 'al London, ; the Lady Raffles, from Ports tisAlPc. I * 24 11 .'z i sn. 2: 1 ' THE MAURITIUS.—.The Symmetry, from Lon rre Z oe ku ,d sailed the 4th for Ceylon ; the Argo, from Bengal, th e e Alai, Vreen Liverpool, and Henry Bell, from London, 4th ; D ar edit the Cape, 3d ; the Eliza, from London, 4th ; d oe from Hobart Town, sth. raom THE MAURITIUS.—The Permee, for Lon hp Zen, 4,7 4 '; the W es t oe , for Cork, 31 s t ; The Augustus, for ilt'atlt IraC 6ol• 24 ; the Apprentice, for London, sth ; the P rem i er , SLiv Ats frohrPore, j AT Sr., HE.LENA.—The Augustus C aesar , f rom 1' 11 1 1 1 e %Lit: tius 23 d, and sa il e d 24t h f or L ondon ; the Sterling, 23d, and sailed 24th for the Mauritius ; the 1 0 „ tail e d Passed 24th • the Royal Sovereign, from China, 24th, 2 64, 1( !ae, f rt ! 6 th for Cow ' es ; the' Concordia, from Batavia ; .the the from the Mauritius • and James Stuart, from Whaling, 1. 011 , th e k dallie ra from the 'Mauritius, 27th, and sailed for Lon -4•041`1‘ ; th e al e, r , .from the Mauritius, 27th, and sailed 29th for 4 0 key', Ariton from Madeira, 3lst ; the Henry Wellesley, th ad • i e the Cape, 31st, and sailed for London ; the Helen, 31st ; the Fatima, from Bengal 31st, and • ‘'D " rO Ol • the Wiliam from Batavia, 31st; the Flora, ch% S' l / 4 3? th .4 4 Ihgs e Augustus, from the Mauritius ; the Symmetry, fror4 r e ; and Hervine, from Madras, Feb. 1 ; the Cal- "ORTING INTELLIGENCE. lilt. TATRSALL'S. It T 's MOTI E ON ON THE. UPTLIES. 2 to 1 on the Ministers (taken). /t o A 110NDAY'S RIDDLEswoRTH, P.r. The ‘ offered agst Mr, Grant's Operator 4 4 t, e „,batt' n ,, DERBY. Ni t ; 4 1. ' w moderate in amount, and not very important in wi t ' ll th • rheas prices varied but little from those last quoted, . e Y two :Itlatances of Ibrahim and Luminary, both of whom gar 9 to P r ee Poibts. The prices closed thus— !ll t o 1 .ztzst Lord Jersey's Silenus (taken) 2 to 1 ..61 t Duke of Cleveland's Pucelle colt (take 12) 13) La to I Nst Duke of Richmond's Leopoldine c. (take e"" to i ost Lord Orford's Ascot (taken) 20 t o .; afot Mr. Walker's Curtius (taken) 20 to 1 agst Captain Grant's lot (offered) 2 2 t o , gst Duke of Rutland's Darioletta colt (taken) Zws t o 1 ' ag Lord Jersey's Ibrahim (offered) 28 to . agst Sir M. Wood's Dromio (offered) 4 0 b z , 1 1 agst Mr. Batson's Luminary (offered) to I 'Pt D. of Cleveland's Bee-in-a-Bonnet c. (offered) aa t„, i 'get Lord Verulam's Varennes colt (offered) 4 0 t o ; agst Colonel 'White's Camel Leopard (offer e d) 'SO % , 4 aagst Mr. B owes ' s Mundig (offered) i ,gst Lord E xeter ' s Gladiator (taken) to 1 OAKs. Ittr. a gat Mr. Mills's Hester (t a k en ) it • W itt' ASCOT GOLD CUP. „Is r s trainer Sh pherd, died on Sunday last. tiL,'"ate`Qtted that ilr. e Watt has sold Bubastes to the Duke of 4- qi AN ° Y, hti ' er t aleuld ppe in Lord Conyngham's name for the ti 'ettk ' ari d Dot Lord A. Conyngham's, as stated in our paper Y. NEWTON RACES. ..,_ iiv.; vv. pp ner ,ENTRIES.—FIR ST DAT. 4 . tt ,s Blackburn I r ' All rner sb. by Olymyus -41 % a4 son' ~1, Moulds aVulture ; , 1 1. umaworth's Luther 41r. S„statley's f b Battledore 13NI. J . !rreel's prisonMo '' 3'. 1 1 .. ~ 430swell's Silvio t 4.. ille,.lnritage's Brother to Her Majesty 4:5r4 eliesest's b. f. by Waverley I ,,rd b_.., Neste eh. f. by the Colonel 111'. p o ",°Y s Glee k.. 15. b. ',views bias J ul i a i.. ;I'ehs Rube 110. PrqlrPs's br. n c. by Bay Walton ,lir. feripson's Lady Frances 1,1? e, I,ttYp's Tom Shipman )3,, 4.rs tee l) ,T . (l of the Manor's Cup and Handicap.. . litlN I)oid:,7dlime, Mezereon, Masetto, Sir Ni i d lliam, Lord 11t, Ik t;', s Thi r . ince, Darius, Lambkin, Cashier, La Bill'Staffor N te "Atsh a ,,kTc later, Red Rover, Syren, General Chasse, %.re1,;,.;,3 Puccaneer Lucks All, Lucy, Tamworth, Lady 4-r irnrose g., ' Miss Golbourne. t t , sxcoNn nAy. 4 4 111 The St. Leger Stakes. 1,. ' t quator, 'Friar Tuck, , • 11 and Usury. flax Tuck, L Ihronde e, yr illy Stakes 4 1 ; , 4, fby ;. _ly of 20 sovs. each, &c. tirY. 4'ngar—Eleanor, f. by Autocrat--Comus mare, i l ‘')N111 rtiott liorough Cup and Sweepstakes. lAr2„ Altss Golbourne, Intriguer, Tamworth, General "Mara, Lord Francis, Birdlime. 4 1 0: 41 1r Titian DAY. Ni:lt ~ liti l, Ai . The Shrigley Cup and Handicap. re ri, tlas Golbourne, Fitzdictor, Whitefoot, Billinge, Bird tilitleat, c eIkUS, Satan, 'Trick - , Fidelio, Mishap h., Buccaneer, i Be R., a.!,,,11er Noodle, Pollio c., L'Hirondelle, Masetto, ktl e i; . Ltd, ,urban, Lambkin, David, Perseverance, General k„,5 • otafford, Lady Moore Carew, Revolution, Lord 1., Trua filly. i\tetter/41./...,5.,.c. --- --- jSt , i lti da.y t i ler o if MIDDLESEX 'MAGISTRATES.— 'VII ii : eot mf ,! eras a full meeting of Middlesex Magistrates hkatt„ — J n4ll, Cle rkenwell-green, for the discussion of qtit c h3 of sq. importance. Th e Ch a i r was ta k en by Ben- Nothin g of public importance took place. PRICES OF CANALS, DOCK STOCKS, ASSURANCE COMPANIES, &c. &c. LONDON, FRIDAY, MARCH 13. Number Dividend Price of per CANALS - per Shares. Annum. Paid. Snare. 1,492 6/. Ashby de-le.Zouch Average 113/. s h . 65 Leo) Basingstoke lOO/. sh. 51 1,01 51. Brecknock rnd Aberga ve nny 150 :. s h . 85 4,00015 h. 12/. 10s. Birmingham, 1 share 171. 10s. 9..37 4,000 Ditto and Liverpool Junct....loo/. sh. all pd 29 600 Bridgewater and Taunton -.1001. sh. all pd 64 4 1.1 0 1 Chelmer and Blackwater . lOOl. sh. 103 CO 421. Coventry 100/. sh. 790 4,515 ... .... Croydon Average 311. Os. 10d. oh. 2 2,0001 01... 100. Dudley lOO/. sh. 67 60d , 6/. Derby 100/. sh. LO 3,5751 ..... .... Ellesmere a: d Chester Average 132!. sh. 96 031 431, Erewash 0 / sh. 55(1 1,097 981. Forth and Clyde Average 404. 16s. sh. 600 11,50) 101. Grand Junction lo'l. sh. 240 1,521 Grand Surrey 11•0/. oh. 100,000!. 5/. per cent. Ditto (optional) Loan lOO/. 75 3,096 Grand Western 600 12/. 10s. od. G lanv , rgansh ire, Average cost 1721. 13s. 4rl. 290 1,960 Gloucester and Berkley 151(1 oh. 040 74 , ./ 101. Grantham '5Ol. sh. 200 6,038 1/. 10s. Huddersfield Average 571. Cs. tid. sh. :13/ 100 Kensington 100 oh all ixl. 10 25,328 11. ss. Kennet and Avon, Average 391. Bs. 100. oh. 00; 2,9971 20/. Leeds and Liverpool 1111 . 1. sh. 520 515 121. Leicester l4O/ oh. 170 49+17 4/. Leicester and Northamplon...Aver 93/. 10s. 79 to 99 559 5/. per cent. Liskeard and Looe Union 251. oh. all p 05 7' l 1441. Loughborough Average 140/. 17s. sh. 1,610 2,419 11. Monmouthshire lOOl. sh. 180 050 91. Melton Mowbray I (T 1 sh. 190 500 251. - Mersey and !men 1001. sh. 561 3,000 Macclesfield 1001. sh. all pd. 50 017 15/. Neath 1011/ sh. 500 101) • Nene Navigation Bonds ...1001. O. 101. pd. 100 1,781 - 301. Oxford . 101. oh. 615 2,400 41. Peak Forest Average about 79/. oh. 102 21,418 14s. Regent's (or London) Aver. 33/. 16s. 80. sh. 113 t 5,609 5/. per cent. Vochdale Average FN. sh. 121 500 81. Shropshire ._.. ___ SW 101. Somerset Coal l5Ol, sh. 170 45,0001. 6/ percent. Ditto Lock Fund Stock l/. 10s. sh. 13 760 361. Staffbrd and Worcester llll sh. 700 :ilk) 5/. Stourbridge 3,r,47 1/. 105. Stratford-on-Av, n ...Average 70!.95. Sd. sh. ripa 533 131. Swansea lOO/. sh. 216 3,762 1/. Severn and Wye and Railway ...Av :3fl. Eh. . 10,1 '2,600 sb.i 321. 10s. Trent and Mersey, i share 1001 . s h . C 2 O 8,149 Thames and Medway...Aver. 191. ss. Sd. sh. 1 I,COO sh.l i cl. Warwick and Birmingham 1001. sh. 273 1,000 1,11.5 ''" PBO I'3. Warwick and Napton lOOl. sh. 220 6,000 3/ IN. Worcester and Birmingham...Av.7B/. Bv. sh. 2',000 ss. 'Wilts and Berke ... Average 161. 17s. Sd. sh. 51 126 ... .... Wisbesch lO5/. sh. 45 110:i 11. Wey and Arun llOl. sh. 221 DOCKS. 3,238,3101. '24 ss. p. ct. London ... Ditto Bond. 1,3 1,390,0001. N. per et. West India 2,1.01 31. 6s. 4d. Bristol Average 14;1. li's. sh. 7 , 4,1 18,3'24/. 5/. per cent. Ditto Notes, various amounts llO 1,352.7:.2 3p r colt. St. Katharine Stock 70 500,000 4i per cent. Ditto Bonds lOl 200,000 4 per cent. Ditto Bonds for 10 years Shoreham Harbour 257 S'cck 57 _.,.-~ us -re at edit `°,, 11 deli fue , dar its iorgo the Surr achieve had tw ° bun's, . bllowing 1 regula t Express •) to that the Pr°' unpres e " earliest lost parts Hudde rs " proprle" ra tion for ping sucl2 ) e press to P• 111.) anivision on THE M I : the loa n ' notice on Copies of ig debate , Addes s ag ents „,, aboa f , ligene e e „ nsequ° nc " the usua l ant of the learn the s answered arrival of in Cherls sidered °.?" icussions Noboel !sted adilw If Armag h ? n quesio n : e and liis with effect 3e o f Lords , e Establi.sh- • wisdom lie De sure, the e advice he ill applaods he 13 311 . Wag the intrig u e was accon. le day whe: st is I n°l ll living sa. was to gu ile) ) untry. idon during vith, to the s low from k e lacer prove ow. ian he 1/11 die :!ant bY lo ot ernont , ti t II md, vachay the v acant )UeeS ter 2bee o lyg, haV i s $l9l th . 1 0 n ou_ to o flby o° . vie' 3ster.n. flaiistor. t GT: be rtol the P i an ibolisbedt ere) ) the °en )isbrown., j 4, priES ° ar t l er 6 ark al l Or d MdtiCt in VI/ resen t • Pre .ift )rte d so s trong or as, that alirrho lection.iabi;-fte, tre w 49 tro l oo sir he " bas te j .r.' de ent con tact' nt the rot r t ~. - of so y batel Cr ill of cryer tg : " nh a bita n ,g 0 fourteen .1 , aossr ias q i a o'cl°' „ a t 0 ° 0 5 thbl a ck ed lit d ,letclY cu tto esdaY' B ye 5 11 • at steP 01 A rari ~010 0 barri s te rs• Ple , te ue this e i ; t to -„ otig lees lie S uch P u tt" 3spe ct., of th e te c, on t he A : re herl"" 0 OO f It lan lo AS e • d, 11 tot l be 01 0 of the", bei l i : o n : 18 , 5 ,11e, lv t be r. P e a ictly hear 0f - 11 Lt the :t n not 01,0 air ° nc ity atr- ceas eP_ a d d tb e e otbl e d or e r i 'sea re' ster cs ' o oo r i ye_ , ,nd 6 . t itetifeh a pr i Or lt iep h 0 41 , Of O pt ' s fre s 7,‘Of • i 0 de av • bob' BRIDGES. 5,000 ,„ Waterloo u~ 100/ sh. ' 34 ... 5,000 I/. °s. Ditto, Old Annuities of 81. 6O /. pd `26a`2.',1 5.000 1 1 / 1 5. 3d. Ditto, New Ditto of it .. 4Ol. pd 23a221 60,0001. 51. per cent. I'it7o Bonds ll5 6,000 1/. Vauxhall Average 701. 10s. 3d. sh. 21 ASSURANCE COMPANIES. _._ ........._. 2,000 3/ IN ” Albion 5001. oh. 50/. pd 7ti 50,000 {5 p n e , r d csesnt.} Alliance, British & Foreign 100/. sh. 10/. pd 12 50,000 6 per cent. Ditto, Marine 1001. sh. 5/. pd 51 21,000 10s. per sh. Atlas 1,200 ish. 4/. Birmingham Fire 2501. sh. 55/. pd 11:11 20,000 41. per cent. British Fire 2io/. oh. 50/. pd 40 12,000 tl. per cent. British Commercial 501 . s h . 5/. pd 7 5,000 5/. per cent. Clerical, Medical, &c. Life...loo/.sh. 21 los pd 31 4,000 21 lOs County MO/. sh. 10/. IA 42 6,000 ss. Eagle 501. sh. 51. pd 51 ~-,r , r 5 per cent.? 1000/. oh. 2501. pd 315 Economic Life -"' and 301 bs. j 2,271 541. percent. European Life 2O!. sh. all pd 32 50,000 2s Ditto, New "0/. sh. 21. pd 11 1,000,000/. 71. per ct. Globe Stock 150 ::0,000 11. Guardian 100/. sh. 201. pd 33 (T Ufe 8 pc . ire 5 p et.? Hope 4°, " tt j i 501. oh. Si. pd fif 2,400 51. 7s. 6d. Imperial Fire 5001 sh. .50/. pd 116 7,510 N. Imperial Life 100/. sh. 10/. pd !•1 5/. per cent. Indemnity Marine ROL sh. SI. pd 12 3,900 1/. London, Fire 2;1 sh. hi. 10s. pd 231 31,003 U. London, Ship 251. ~h . la. 105. pd 231 40,000 U. per cent. Palladium Life 50/. sh. 21. pd 2 / 5 s 250,001 Is. fid. Protector File "0!. sh. 2/. pd 11 lOs 2,500 11. Provident Life 1( 0/. sh. 1 1 1. pc( 191 100,000 s s . R ock Life . 0/. sh. sl. pd 519 s 68i1,2201. 51. per cent. Royal Exchange Stock... 182 50,00.) 4 per cent. United Kingdom Life "1 pd 212 s 6d JOINT STOC! BANKS. 5,000 Australa-ia 1 40/. oh. 23/. pd 26 10,000 lOper cent. Birmingham Bank 5Ol. sh. 5/. pd 131.al 50,000 London and Westixinster...loo/ sh. 15/. pd 13 20,000 7 per cent. Provincial Bank of I reland...loo/. oh. 251. pd 444 10,000 National Provincial 100/. sh. 25/. pc( 19 10,000 10 per cent. Gloucestershire 501. sh. Si. pd 11 6,000 GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANIES. 2,500 11 12s Bath 2O/. oh. 1(1. pd 291a20 5,000 61. per cent. British 4O/. sh. 16/. poi 23 5.000 1 a 5/Ae ß rc s en a t.} Ditto rrovincial 201. sh. 19/. pd 241 . 844 51 lOs Birmingham 5O/. oh. 100 4,250 250 21 Os B r i s t o l 2Ol. sh. 291 Brighton 750 Ditto, New 2Ol. sh. IS/. pd 12 2,471 21 per cent. Brighton General 201 sh. all pd 19 4,000 34 Continental Cansolidated lOO/. 514/. pd 64 1,000 RV. - City of London lOOl. sh. all pet 1921 1,000 61. Ditto, New Equitable 10,000 51. per cent. Imperial •so[. O. 44fex d SOO 5/. per cent. Isle of Thanet 251. sh. 20/. pd 211 2.350 61. per cent. I ndependent 304 oh. all pd 50 9,000 4/. per cent. Phoenix 50/. sh. 39/. pd 251 1,000 4/. per cent. Ratcliff 100/. sh. CO/. pd 45 8,200 5/. per cent. United General 5O/. sh. 44/. pd 41 240 51. per cent. Warwick s'/. sh. 50 400 115 s Wakefield 25/. sh. 221 P 2,000 3 /. Westminster Chartered 5O /. s h . 4 7 a 6,000 12s: Ditto, New 3O/. sh. 10/. pd 9ex d --- WATER WORKS. 4,800 Birmingham 251. sh. 25/ pd 271 4,433 5/. East London lOOl. sh. PS/ 4,500 2/ lOs Gund Junction ....Average 411 13s. 4d. sh. 33 2,000 2/. Kent 100/. sh. 4';a47 3 , S 10/. Liverpool Bootle 2201 . s h . 30 0 1,500 21 lOs New River London Bridge Wat er Annuities 58 6,486 1/. Manchester and Salford 1,000 4 per cent. South London 100/. sh. 83 8, 00 31. West Middlesex ....Average 63/. 12s. 9d. sh. 79 • ,360 1/ 14s York Building Co. Lessee Prop 1001. sh. 34 IRON RAILWAYS. Cheltenham 100/. sh. 78 Clarence lOO/. e h. 1001. pd 39 19s. Forest of Dean 5O/ 28 Grand Junction 100/. sh. 201. p 1 2'2 5,100 9 per cent. Liverpool and Manchester...loo/. sh. 100/. pd Ditto Quarter Shares "5/. pd 49+ 20,000 ...... ... London and Greenwich "0/. sh. 13/. pd 11+ 25,000 London and Birmingham ...100/. sh. 25/. pd 291 2,500 Preston and Wigan 2Ol. pd 2 600 D.lrhatn Junction 1001. sh. 101. pd 15 pin 350 2,000 2,500 LIST OF SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES, MARCH 2, 1835. BANKS. 1,500,00 n/. RI. p. et. Bank of Scotland B3l. Gs. Sd. sh. all pd 200 p. ct. 2,000,0001. 511 p. ct. Royal of Scotland 1051. sh. all pd 170/. 500,000/. Bp. ct. Briti , h Linen;Company 100/.5h.:41 pd 240/. 3,000,000/. Si. p. ct. Commercial 5OOl. sh. 1001. pd 170/. 5,000,000/. 5 p. ct, National lOO/. sh. 10/. pd 1410s.p.sh 2,000004 2 1 1/. p. ct. Glasgow Union °W. sh. 50/. pd 60/. 4,000,00t..1. 6p. ct. Western of Scotland 2OOl. sh 30/. pd 3/2. INSURANCE COMPANIES. 250,000ih. sp. ct. Scottish Union '2ol. sh. 1/. pd 11 7,500 fp. ct. Hercules 100/. sh. 10/. pd 111. 100,000 sp. ct. Insurance Co. of Scotland....lol. sh. all pd 7110 s 50,000 6p. ct. North British 2001. sh. 10/. pd 151. 1,000 sp. ct. Caledonian Fire 100/- sh. 10/. pd 131. 5,000 6p. et. Edinburgh Life 100/. sh. 10/. pd 131. 100,000 4p. ct. West of Scotland lOl. pd In/. COURSE OF EXCIL Amsterdam C.F. 12 5 , -, Ditto, at sight Rotterdam 'U. 12 5y4 Antwerp l2 4yi Hamburg M.B. 131_ Altana l3 12 Paris, 3 days' sight 25 55 Ditto 0 Us 25 F 5 Bordeaux Berlin F-ankfort on Maine, Ex. M 15114 Petersburgli, ruble 3 Us. 10 1 ,6 Vienna, effective fl °M. 10 1 Trieste ditto lO 2 Madrid 37'i Cadiz 'l7 .i, Bilboa 37 Barcelona Seville 'l7 Gibraltar 4B INGE.-(THIS DAY.) Leghorn 1 7 li Genoa 25 80 Milan 3l Venice 4 7 16 Naples 40% Palermo per oz. 121 Lisbon 57% Oporto 5B Rio Janeiro 36% Bahia 26% Buenos Ayres Dublin, 21 days' sight l;•4 Cork l% PRICE OF BULLION, PER OZ. Portugal Gold, coin £0 0 0 Foreign Gold, in bars 3 17 9 New Doubloons New Dollars Silvers bars, standard 0 0 0 DIVISION ON THE MALT TAX.—The names of Messrs. Baines, Strutt, Hutt, W. H. Brodie, C. Lushiniton, Hawes, Bewes, Collier, G. H. Cavendish, and Cowper, should have been inserted in our list of the majority, and omitted from the minority. Sir John Owen and Mr. Sergeant Wilde were present, and voted in the majority. Messrs. Winston Barron and Mr. Dykes did not vote. The Earl of Sefton is pronounced out of danger by his physicians. _ It is in contemplation, we are told, to give Lord John Russell a public dinner. Lord Viscount Exmouth has returned to this country from India. His Lordship arrived in this city last evening, changing horses at Pratt's Old London Inn, and immediately proceeded to his seal at Canonteign. His Lordship was ac companied by his brother, the Hon. Mr. Pe llew.—.Exeter Paper of Monday. We have reason to believe that the accomplished Lord Douglas, only son of his Grace the Duke of Hamilton, is about to be united to a daughter of Lord Shrewsbury ; the same whom his Majesty the King of Bavaria endowed with the title of Princess. The lady is a Catholic. The parties are now at Rome. Lord Hill's levee at the Horse Guards yesterday consisted of the Duke of Gordon, Lord Lorton, Lord Hotham, Lieutenant-General Mitchell, Major- General Sir T. Pritzler, Major-General Mawby, Colonel Sir C. Cowper, Major-Gen. Burrows, Lord Falmouth, Colonel Studd, Colonel Wemyss, Colonel Perry, Major-General Macdonell, Colonel Scott, Lieut.-General Sir P. Wetherall, Colonel Sir Charles Broke, Colonel Sir F. Higgins, Colonel Milman, Colonel Gawler, Colonel Lambert, Colonel Love, Colonel Wallace, Sir Ed ward Prideaux, and about fifty other officers. Lady Mor g an ' s "0' Donne]," one of her earliest and best national tales, is again attracting considerable atten tion, in consequence of its being introduced into Mr. Colburn's new and cheap collection of Modern Novelists, the three vo lumes being comprised in one, at the price of only ss.bound and embellished. " O'Donnel" exhibits, in its progress some of the most graphic scenes that are to be encountered in the boundless range of imaginative literature; and its circulation will now be deservedly extended among a new and very nume rous class of readers. CANTERBURY ELECTION.—The interest, says the Kent Herald, attending this memorable contest, in which the impulse of pure principle alone defeated the whole power of the aristocracy and clergy of East Kent, continues unabated, or rather augments as the period draws near for trying Mr. Lush ington's petition against the return of Frederic Villiers, Esq. It is what is technically called " a fishing Petition," that is a sweeping attack upon all points, regardless of the truth of any particular allegation, in the hope that if one fail another may by chance succeed. This is always considered by respectable parties, a mast dishonourable and disgraceful mode of pro ceeding. THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, MARCH 13, 1835. SECOND EDITION. SUN OFFICE, Seven o'clock THE LONDON GAZETTE THIS EVENING. WAR-OFFICE, MARCH 13, 1835. I2th Ragiment of Foot.—Assistant-Surgeon T. F. Cotton, from the 14th Regiment, to be Surgeon, vice Orton, deceased, March 13. 13th Foot—Ensign G. A. Tytler to be Lieuteuant, by purchase, vice Bolton, who retires; R. H. Yea, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Tytler, March 13. 14th Foot—Staff Assistant-Surgeon H. Drummond, M.D. to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Cotton, promoted in the 12th Regi giment, March 13. „ . _ _ 19th Foot—Surgeon J. Wyer, from the 74th Regiment, to be Surgeon, vice Waterson, who has received a commutation, March 13. tllth Foot—Ensign and Adjutant T. Hodgetta to have the rank of Lieutenant, March 13. 34th Foot.—Lieut. W. Colt to be Captain, by purchase, vice Thompson, who retires; Ensign E. Heathcote to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Colt ; J. Simpson, Gent. to be Ensign, by pur chase, vice Heathcote. March 13. •13d Foot—Lieut. J. T. W•Jones, from the half-pay Unattached, to be Lieutenant, vice W. G. Bvam, who exchanges. March 13. 511 d Foot—Lieut. S. R. Streatfield to be Captain, by purchase, vice Heathcote, who retires; Ensign B. Palmes to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Streatfield ; Gentleman Cadet G. Campbell, from the Royal Military College, to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Palmes, March 13. _ _ _ 56th Foot.—H. D. Crofton, Gent:, to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Burnall, who retires, March 13. pith Foot—Lieut. A. B. Baxter, from the half-pay 43d Regi ment, to be Lieutcnent, vice Spence, appointed to the 89th Regi ment, March 13. 62d Foot—Ensign R. A. Shearman to be Lieutenant, by pur chase, vico D'Anvers, who retires; T. K. Scott, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Shearman, March 13. 64th Foot—Ensign W. Lucas to be Lieutenant, by purchase, eice Peaeocke, who retires; A. B. Parker, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Lucas, March 13. - 67th Foot—Staff Assistant Surgeon E. H. Blakeney to be As. sistant Surgeon, vice Cumming, promoted in the 74th regiment March 13. 74th Foot—Assistant Surgeon A. Cumming, from the 67th re. giment, to be Surgeon, vice Wyer, appointed to the 19th regiment March 13. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. JOSEPH HORSLEY ELLIS, timber merchant,_ Southampton, JOHN SHRIMPTON WILSON, coach proprietor, Agnes. place, Waterloo-road. WILLIAM WILLIAMS, shopkeeper, Panteague, Monmouth. shire. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. WILLIAM OKILL, share-broker, Liverpool, from March 24, to April 11, at one at the Clarendon Rooms, Liverpool. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. JOSEPH BAILEY, cattle•dealer, Sparsholt, Hants. JOHN PIIILLIMORE HICKS and CHARLES EDWARD HICKS, clothiers, Eastington, Gloucestershire. JAMES DICK' SSON, laoe manufacturer, Nottingham. JAMES LE COUTEUR, woollen-draper, St. Peter's Port, Guernsey. BANKRUPTS. HENRY ROWED and JOHN WILLIAM GRENE SHIELDS, tailors, New Bond-street. JOHN PHILLIMORE HICKS and CHARLES EDWARD HICKS, clothiers, Eastington, Gloucestershire. FREDERICK SANDON, druggist, Newgate-street. JOHN PENN, bookseller, Leamington, Warwickshire. JOHN SMITH, surgeon, Oxford. DAVID ROBERTS, draper, Pwllheli, Carnarvon. THOMAS BUMPAS, jun. grocer, Northampton. JOHN NORMAN, innkeeper, Staffordshire. BANK OF AVERAGE of the LIABILITIL ENGLAND, from the 16th Deem. published pursuant to the Act, 3 am LIABILITIES. Circulation t;18,311,000 Securities C 26,657,00 Deposits ENGLAND. S and ASSETS of the BANK o: Iber, 1834, to the 10th March, 1635, - Id 4 W. 4, cap. 93, sec. S. ASSETS. £30,592,000 Downing-street, March 12, 1835. £33,193,000 EXPRESS EDITION. THE PARLIAMENT. (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. The LORD CHANCELLOR took took his seat at Five o'clock, having sat before to hear appeals. Mr. CAMPBELL (from the East India House) presented an account of the compensation proposed to be granted to certain officers, late of the Hon. East India Company's service. Lord LONGFORD took the oaths and his seat. CHESTER CRIMINAL COURT'S BILL. The Marquis of WESTMINSTER called the attention of their Lordships to certain clauses in this Bill relating to the expenses of executions and burials, which he thought pressed rather hard upon the city of Chester. He therefore proposed that the third reading of this Bill should be deferred until Monday next. The LORD CHANCELLOR said there was no new charge thrown upon the city of Chester, and he saw no reason for postponing the third reading of the Bill. The Bill was then read a third time and passed. ECCLESIASTICAL REFORMS. Lord BROUGH AM took an opportunity of referring to certain votes in the House of Commons on the revious night, relating to the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Courts in matters of tithe, and other motions respecting Ecclesiastical matters, of which he could only be cognizant by looking into the paper. He did not feel on the part of their Lordships the least degree of jealousy of the other House, nor had he the smallest objection to this proceeding, because he believed they would exercise their power in a judicious manner; at the same time he thought that nothing should be done which was not founded on the report of the Ecclesiastical Commission of 1831-34. That commission was composed of men of the highest talent and capability, who, after a patient investiga tion, furnished a report which, for learning, the soundness of its views, and the correctness - of its conclusions, could not be surpassed by the report of any other Commission. This was not the first time he had panegyrized that report, for he did so in 1831. Such opinions he still entertained on the subject. In conse quence of the report of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners—on which Commission was his Honourable and Learned Friends (Sir J. Nicholl and Dr. Lushington), who assented to that re port, he (Lord B.) deemed it to be his duty to have Bills pre pared with a view to carry into effect the recommendation of that Commission. Accordingly the Bills were prepared—six several Bills referring to the six several subjects embraced in the report were prepared, for the reason that some might ap prove one Bill and some another, and with a view to separate matters relating to such multifarious topics, that otherwise might have been combined in Bill. An objection, however, was made to this separation, and after the six Bills were pre pared, in consequence of a further recommendation from the Commissioners, which he was bound in deference to attend to, he consolidated the six bills into one, and brought it before their Lordships on July 12, 1833. They ordered it to be printed, and it was precisely similar to that introduced into the Commons last night. The title of the Bill was, " An Act to Consolidate the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction of England and Wales." The title of that introduced last night into the other House of Parliament confined it merely to England, although lie hoped it was intended to be extended to Wales also. It also proposed to enlarge the powers of', and to consolidate the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of England. That was the only distinction. The third Act was one for the consolidation of the jurisdiction, and to alter and amend the laws in cer tain matters ecclesiastical; and another was for the better discipline of the clergy. The Bill, it would consequently appear, had in view precisely the same objects. The Bill that he ( Lord B.) had the honour of bringing under their Lord-. ships' attention was not proceeded with—it was read only a first time. At that time their Lordships would recollect that there was a Bill in their Lordships' House relative to the East India Company's Charter ; another relative to the Emancipa tion of the Slaves in the West Indies ; another, as to the Irish Church ; and three or four law bills of great importance, all of which were sufficient for them to . get through this session. On account, therefore, of the great importance of the business they bad to do, he recommended that the Bill should stand over till the next Session. He stated that there were two sub jects embodied in that Bill, which ought not to have been introduced in it. The one was respecting faculties, and the other as to the power of accommodating his Majesty's sub jects in churches ; but, in deference to the recommen dation of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners, lie yielded. That Bill was then brought in for the first time, and ordered to be printed, but never proceeded with for the reasons before stated. In the Session of 1834, the opinion and assistance of a learned person (Sir H. Jenner) was obtained, and a new Bill, leaving out the rate clauses, and remodelling, if not entirely omit ting the clause respecting the law of real and personal estate, was directed to be framed while he (Lord B.) held the Great Seals, and was in the course of being framed, and would have been at once presented to Parliament in the beginning of this session. As it was impossible for them to tell what would be the fate of the Bilt in the other House, there could be harm in re assuming their own measure ; and he should therefore present it to their Lordships in the shape in which he held it ought to be presented. He should not of course press any pro ceeding until he saw that the other Bill wat not likely to come up. lie intended to leave out everything respecting church rates, as that was not a fit subject for their Lordships, because it related to the levying of money. The reasen he had asked their Lordships to omit those clauses was, that an Hon. and Learned Friend of his, the Member for Edinburgh ( Sir John Campbell) had brought in a Bill in the other House of Parliame n t addressed to this very subject, but that Bill did not profess to proceed on the two Bills which he had now stated the title of to their Lord ships. and which were brought in last night by the Attorney- General—that Bill did not profess to proceed upon the ground of the recommendation of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners or their Report. There was an unfortunate conflict of opinion between the Ecclesiastical Commission and the Commission on the law of real property. The Ecclesiastical Com mission took one view of some points, and the real property Commissioners, one of whom was the late Attorney-General, ( Sir J. Campbell) took an opposite view of some of these points. He agreed in the main as to sonic of the most ma terial ; among one was that of extending the statute of frauds , from devices of reality to bequests of personality. The Commissioners of real property proposed making some very extensive alterations in the law, to which the other Commissioners had not directed their attention--( Hear. ) That being the case, he should wish to have an oppor tunity of bringing in a measure founded on those clauses mentioned in the Report of the Ecclesiastical Commissioners. he should wish to have an opportunity of seeing and consider ing the Bill brought into the other House of Parliament, not founded on the report of the Ecclesiastical Commissions, but founded upon the report of the real Property Commissioners. With that view he should present the Bill with those new alterations. He begged to move that the Bill be now read a first time. The LORD CHANCELLOR did not rise for the pur pose of obje,etiog to the Noble Lord's proceeding with his Bill, but to enter into some explanation of the circum stances to which the Noble and Learned Lord had referred. The Commission to which the Noble and Learned Lord had alluded, was a Commission issued by the Govern ment of the Noble Lord. ( Hear, hear.) He agreed with the Noble Lord, as to the merits of the individuals who composed that commission, and also as to the merits of their Report. That Report was made about three years ago, and he believod that Report had been preferred and laid on their Lordship's Table, although it had never been printed, or at all events not circulated. He had made enquiry respecting it. He believed that another Bill had been prepared, and very considerably advanced; indeed, that it had been sub mitted to the consideration of Sir H. Jenner and Sir J. Nicholl, when it was submitted to him it appeared to his mind to be an extremely desirable measure. He con sidered that he had taken the proper course respecting it—he wrote to the late Attorney General, asking him whether he intended to bring in that Bill to the other House—that Hon. and Learned Gentleman in :reply said he considered the bill to belong to the Government. He (the Lord Chan cellor) then had some communication with Sir H. Jenner and Sir J. Nicholl, and the result was that in his opinion the bill, as it embraced two or three propositions, should be brought in in so many different bills. Should the Bills, or either of them, be thrown out in the other House, or should they come up in such shape as to be disagreeable to their Lordships, then it would be quite competent for the Noble and Learned Lord to proceed with his Bill. Lord BROUGHAM said he had not the least objection to postpone his Bill upon such grounds. It gave him very great pleasure to hear what had fallen frcm the Noble and Learned Lord relative to the real p.operty Commissioners. His opinion was exactly the same upon that question, which g ave it th e more weight, as they had not th e slightest communication upon the matter. In answer to a question from the Duke of CUNIBERLAND, Lord BROUGHAM said the diffetence between his 13i1 and that of the House of Commons was, that the latter con• tained noting about church-rates and wills. other parishes where such was not the case. They had drawn up a memorial complaining of such a course to the Commis sioners of the Poor Law Bill, but the memorial had been neglected, and they were thus obliged to abide by the decision of the Commissioners that the arrangement was to be carried into effect, and that this parish was to be united with eighteen others, whereby those other parishes would take the advantage of this parish, which as he had be fore observed, was enabled to maintain its own poor. It would appear that this particular district was not like many others in the neighbourhood ;—there were many landed proprietors and gentlemen residing there who employed the poor, and conse quently reduced the demand on the inhabitants, as well as in creased the comfort of their labourers. They, therefore, loudly objected to having the poor of other parishes forced on them, which would have the effect of reducing them to the greatest distress. There was, however, one part of the Bill of which they loudly complained, inasmuch as by its provisions wives might be sent to one workhouse and husbands - to another. If this were to be generally acted upon, he (the Noble Marquis) was convinced it would create the greatest discontent through out England, and he begged most loudly to protest against such an act of injustice. He had communicated this fact to the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, and he earnestly called his attention to it, for it appeared that the Poor Law Commissioners had apower superior to the Secretary of State himself. Major BE A UCLERK said he did not object at the time of the discussion on the Poor Law Bill to this power being granted to the Commissioners, but he considered that it was a most unjust proceeding to force the poor of one parish on the industrious of another. lie hoped his Majesty's Ministers would take the subject into consideration, as many districts with which he bad acquaintance had complained to him of this pro eeeding,--many of them declaring that they would rather die than go to a worklusnse. Mr. WILKS considered that every parish in the cou n t r y was under great obligations to the Noble Marquis for havi ng brought forward the petition. They wers: told that this parish supported its own poor.—( Hear, hear.) Wni, then, should there be any interference with an arranffemei:!; which was satisfactory to all parties ? It was too bad that suet: an arbitrary power should be placed in the hands of people, by whom it was so much abused. He hoped the House would take the subject under consideration. The petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr. POULTER presented a petition for the better ob servance of the Lord's Day. Sir MICHAEL S. STEW ART presented two petitions from Greenock and Lochwinoch, for the protection of the Church Establishment in Scotland. Mr. J. MAXWELL presented a petition from 1,700 hand loom weavers of Glasgow, complaining of want of employment, and pray ingrelief. Captain PEC HELL presented a petition from the inn. keepers and licensed victuallers of Brighton, complaining of the additional tax imposed upon them by the License Bill of last Session. They also prayed to be relieved from the respon sibility of making good the property of visitors which might be lost in their houses. LICHFIELD SELECTION. Mr. HUME presented a petition from an individual whose name we could not learn, which stated that he had entrusted it to the Hon. and Learned Member for Chester ( Mr. Jervis) complaining of an undue return for the city of Litch field, with the understanding that it should be presented on the last day allowed for that purpose. That the Honourable Member had presented it upon the 6th instant, and the petitioner having been out of town was unable to per fect the securities within the limited time. The question then was, whether the petitioner had been deprived of his right by his own negligence, or by that of an Hon. and Learned Member of that House ? If the latter had been the case, he (Mr. Hume) was satisfied that the House would not deny the peti tioner an opportunity of perfecting his securities. Mr. C. W. WYNN hoped the House would not listen to such an excuse as that urged by the petitioner in the present instance. The parties complain that they bad not time to enter into the recognizances, but he did not think that under the circum stances, the House, without notice, should go into the matter. Would not the better plan be to bring the matter again under the notice of the House ? Mr. HUME agreed, and svould do so on Monday. - Mr. Sec. GOULBURN trusted that as the petitioners had most clearly violated the Act of Parliament, the House would not allow them now to come and succeed in such an ap plication, because it was alleged that a Member of that House had not acted according to the instructions he received. If so, they would open too wide a door, and set their own rules at de fiance. It appeared that the petition in question was entrusted to an Hon. Member, with instructions not to present it till the 10th, which was the last day for receiving such petitions—but that the Honourable Member had presented it on the 6th, and they complained that they were not aware that the time for entering into the recognizances had come—but the votes of the House were published and it ought to be known to every one. He considered it would be very im politic to open the question afresh. Mr. HUME said the parties in question never saw the votes, and did not know any thing of what had passed relative to their petition. He trusted that the House would not punish any one because of the forgetfulness of any Hon. Gentleman. Sir J. CAMPBELL said he believed there were many pre cedents for extending the time to parties in such circumstances. As to what had fallen from the Right Hon. Secretary relative to the votes—it was well known that the votes were printed for the convenience of the House, but they were not supposed to get into the hands of the public. It was clear the parties in this case had not the means of knowing their time, and there fore would it not be better to allow further time for the consi deration of the matter ? The'SPEAKER said, that if the mistake had been com- mitted by an agent, it would not be a ground for a party to apply to that House ; and the circumstance of the person making the mistake being a Member of that House, and not an agent, did not alter the case. Mr. HUME said, that as the opinion of the Speaker was against allowing further time, he felt it his duty to with draw the petition. The petition was accordingly withdrawn. CONFIDENCE IN HIS MAJESTY'S MINISTERS. Mr. HUME said he bad received a petition this morning from Leicester, stating that the petitioners had received with much pleasure the decision of the House upon the choice of Speaker.—( Loud cheering and laughter.) And next to the announcement of the election of the Right Hon. Gentleman—(renewed cheers and laughter from the Ministerial benches)—that they had felt most grati fied by the adoption of the Amendment to the Ad dress—(tremendous cheering from the Opposition benches) — in reply to his Majesty's speech. But while they felt this, they could not but express their alarm and apprehension at the tenacity with which his Majesty's Ministers—( Tremendous cheers and laughter)—Mr. Hume repeated, they could not but express their alarm and apprehension at the tenacity with which his Majesty's Ministers clang to the offices of the Government which they had so sur►:eptitiously obtained— ( Renewed cheering, which continued for some time) — that they could not forget that the present Mink:l.ers had been the most determined opponents of Parliamentary R e form, and of all Municipal Reform—( Great cheers, and counter clieers from the Ministerial benches)—that they had publicly avowt:s 4 principles which they now for the sake of office deny, and that their promises were mere hollow pretences to con ceal their determination to retain substantially all abuses. The Petition was signed by upwards of 2500 persons, and it humbly entreated the House to keep a vigilant and watchful eye upon the measures that should be brought forward by his Majesty's Ministers in order to secure those reforms in the insti- tutioniof the country which were so essentially necessary,and not to grant any supplies for a longer period than three months. --( Cheers and laughter.) He entirely concurred with the prayer of the petition, and he could assure the House that in the whole course of his life, there never was anything he so much regretted as the determination he had made last night, of his' intention not to bring forward the motion he had given notice of, which would have fulfilled the prayer of the petition. ( Hear, hear, hear.) The principal means by which that House could control the Mi nisters of the Crown was withholding the Supplies, and although he agreed with the petitioners, he could not but think that the House ought to have anticipated a petition like the present, and taken the sense of its members as to whether Ministers had or had not the confidence of the country.—(Hear, hear, and loud cheers.) He trusted the time was not far distant when the subject would be brought forward. He could only again regret that circumstances had occurred to render it ne- eessary for him to withhold his motion, but he begged it to be understood that although it might appear that there was dis- union among the reforMing side - of 7 tfie House on many sub jects, still, upon all great points, they were united.—( Cheers.) The petition was ordered to lie on the table. ELECTION PETITIONS. Mr. S. RICE rose to resume the discussion, which had been postponed the day before, respecting the letter from Mr. Wallace relative to a petition against a return at the last elec tion, which bad been lodged with the clerk of the Crown Of fice in Dublin. He considered that there would be no objec tion to receiving this petition in the usual manner; and no error or omission ought to debar any individual from the right of petitioning. 'He would move that the discussion of this subject be further postponed until Monday week, to give an opportunity both to the Clerk of the Crown Office in Dub lin, and to the petitioner, to forward to that House further particulars in the matter. Mr. C. W. WYNN, after a few observations which were inaudible in the gallery, read the regulations respecting 'elec tion petitions, from which it appeared that all :inch petitions must be printed within 14 days, and be accompanied with a copy. lie requested that the House would not allow a petition to be stopped in its progress by any officer. Mr. LEFROY said he would wish to call the attention of the House on behalf of the Members for the city of Cork, that the subject might be postponed from the 2d of April until after the Assizes. There had been a question against the validity of the election of the present Members. Seve ral persons had been summoned, most of them public of ficers, whose attendance would be required at the time of the Assizes, which generally occupied about a fort night, and would therefore interfere with the attendance in this House. If they were compelled to be brought over at the date of the present petition, it would be attended with great inconvenience to the parties summoned themselves, as they comprised the Mayor, Sheriffs, and Town Clerks of the city as well as a great expense to the petitioners themselves. The Hon. Member contended that the same principle had been acted upon in the case of a petition against the sitting Mem ber for Clonmel. He would remind the House that the duty of the Clerk of the Crown was of a very multifarious and im- portant nature, and that it would be quite impossible to procure his attendance ; he therefore moved that the petition be taken into consideration on some day after the Easter recess. Mr. P. O'CONNOR denied that a case had been made out by the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite for postponing the consideration of this petition. It was well known that no Cork City Assizes lasted longer than three or four days. Under those circumstances, he trusted that the House would not suffer the rights of the petitionersao be interfered with. No case had been made out for the postponement ; and with respect to the attendance of witnesses, only a few of then, would he required at the commencement of the sittings of the Committee. Mr. O'CONNELL said the Carlow case which had been alluded to had been postponed for the purpose of accommodat ing both parties. There was no business done the day after the ballot in such election petitions. The following day would be a Saturday, so that if the case was stated, and one witness examined, there would be sixteen clear days after the com mencement of the Assizes, to enable the other witnesses to attend. So far as his experience went, he could corroborate the statement of the Hon. and Learned Member for Cork, that no Assizes for that city lasted longer than th ree or f our d ays . Mr. JACK SON said that although the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin was perfectly correct with respect to the Assizes for the City of Cork, he had completely lost sight of the business of the County of Cork.---( Hear.) He was sura that the object of the petitioners was justice, but he was much afraid that it would not be done if the prayer of the petition was granted.. Mr. C. W. WY N N would not attempt to give an opinion as to the duration of the Assizes. The Hon. Member's ob servations were almost inaudible in the Gallery, but we under stood him to say that he was opposed to the postponement of the petition until after the recess. No circumstance connected with any public officer should be permitted to cause such a delay. Mr. WARBURTON said it now appeared that the exa mination of the witnesses would not take place immediately after the appointment of the Commission ; and Shat there were sixteen clear days from the commencement of the Assizes. Even admitting that the Assizes would last thirteen days, Still there were three clear days for the witnesses to come over. Could it not be arranged that the business of the citizens might Le a little expedited ? Had not the Learned Ser geant opposite admitted that the criminal business seldom lasted longer than five days ? It was his opinion that nothing like a ease had been made out, and he thought that a very d ea n case should be established before the House would in- Cries of ques ti on .) terfere.-.. ‘ ` s. RIC,S thought that the grounds had been laid before the House for postpCning the investigation of this petition to so late a period. The:e were a great many other election petitions to be taken into cousideration with which the present, if postponed, would interfere. . - The motion was then agreed to. on the motion " that the House do resolve into a Committee of Supply." IRISH CHURCH. Lord J. RUS SELL said that it was well known to the House generally that be had given notice of a motion of verygreat importance for the 23d of March. He had to give his warm est thanks to the Hon. Member for St. Albans, for the hand some manner in which he had given up that motion entirely. into his hands.—(Cheers.) At the time he gave that notice, he was informed that the report of the Commisssioners would be on the table of that House. He wished to ask the Hon. Bart., whether that report was likely to be on the table by that time, for he had since been informed that such was not likely to be the fact.—( Cheers.) He did not doubt for a moment but that whenever such a report reached the Govern ment, it would at once be laid upon the table. He only wished to say that on whatever day, whether on the 23d, or on some subsequent day, he should fix his motion, he proposed to move a call of the House for that day.— ( Hear, and cheers.) He only wished to know whether when the information he required would be offered, he would be prepared to bring forward his motion either on the 23d or any other day that would be fixed for convenience of all parties. Sir H. HA RD INGE said that if the Noble Lord had in timated that he intended to put this question he shonld be pre pared to give him an answer as to date at which ho expected the report—( Hear.) He could now only trust to memory, and could state that some ago he made inquiries, and was informed that the reporr would be made at the end of March or the beginning of April--( Loud cries of " Hear, hear.") He would only say on the part of the Government that they had not thrown any interruption or impediment in the way of the Commissioners ; on the contrary, they had shown every readiness to afford all the facility in their p o w er . When the report was received, the Noble Lord would be im mediately informed of it. Lord J. RUSSELL—With regard to the answer he had received, he begged to state that he had been informed by ene of the Commissioners that there would be a report shortly ready, but that there was also to be a general report. He was informed, also by a Commissioner that some of the Commissioners were not supplied by the Trea sury with funds to enable them to prosecute their inquiries. If there was any delay, it was, he was sure, a delay of form, but not of intention. Under the circumstances, however, he wished to know the sense of the House on the subject. At present it was his intention to wait till Monday. In the meantime he would know the precise day to bring forward the question, and then he would move a call of the House. If it should be brought forward on an order day. He would move an amendment that the House should go into a Committee of the whole on the state of the Irish Church. THE ADMIRALTY. Sir E. CODRINGTON wished to ask the Noble Lord (Ashley) if the Gallant Admiral now commanding the Ja maica station, and had been appointed a Lord of the Admi ralty, received both salaries. _ _ _ Lord ASHLEY said he was not entitled to both sala rises, and would not demand them. Sir J. P. HERE SFORD could vouch for the Gallant Officer that he would not receive it if it were offered to him.-... (Hear.) Sir GEORGE GREY said, whether he had received two salaries or not, was not the question, but whether he was not entitled to two for the last periods, becanse in the event of his death his legal representatives would have a legal right to sue for those two salaries. THE NEW HOUSES. • Mr. HALL wished to know from the Noble Lord opposite whether it was intended to confine the plans for the new houses to those submitted to the Committee by Sir Robert Smurke, or whether it was intended to throw it open to all architects, for if the former course was intended to be pursued, he should submit a motion to the House.—( Cheers.) _ _ Lord G. SOSIE R SET.—Opinions had been expressed on ;he subject in the Committee, but it was impossible sor him satisfactorliy to state what course was intended to be pursued by the Committee. Sir R. PEEL said that the report of the Commissioners bad not been received. It was his impression they bad stated it would be ready about the end of February. Mr. BLACKBURN raid that it was in a state of forward ness, they were almost all printed, and the only obstacle was in the form, as some places of small extent had not been visited, and which he almost feared he should scarcely be able to obtain. a report at all. This, however, did not interfere with the principle of the Bill, as all the largets towns had been all united, and the sports on them were complete. Mr. PR YME observed that he was sorry this question had not met with a more satisfactory answer, considering .the im 'ortance of the question, and the great interest the public at tacr,OuAto i t. Sir::. PEEL said that every Member was certainly en titled to ab:c any question he pleased, and it w as a l wa y s hi s intention to anywuhimas fully as he could. Mr. P. THO.S:SON said he was anxious to know whether intended proceeding with the estimates the Right Hon. Bart. this evening, or whether be was inclined to postpone them until after April 2. when he hoped by that time the House and the country would be put in posse,,sion of close reforms, both as respected the Church, and this particular inquiry, which were so anxiously looked for. Sir R. PEEL said that he would bring forward the Esti mates as soon as possible; but he thought nothing was saved by bringing forward such documents before the Government had had time to do so in an accurate shape, and fit for prac tical purposes. (LEFT SPEAKING.) IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. SUPPLIES-MR. HITME'S MOTION. Mr. Il UME said—the Right Hon. Bart. ( Sir R. Peel) put a question to me last night respecting the motion of which ) had given notice. lam now able to state to the Right Hon. Bart. that having consulted with my friends on this side of the House, I regret to state that I find they do not concur with me in consi dering the question sufficiently decisive ; and I have therefore been induced to postpone the determination I had come to of opposing the Supplies, with the view to a subsequent mo tion, tending to show that this House has no confidence in his Majesty's Ministers. Sir R. PEEL—Is this, then, the motion of which the Hon. Gentleman gave solemn notice some weeks since ? (Loud cheers)—of which he found it incumbent on him to give notice a week before.—( Repeated cheering.) I asked the Honourable Gentleman, last night, if he meant to bring forward his proposition of limiting the supplies ; and he says he gave me a conditional answer. That conditional answer was that the motion would be certainly brought on— ( Great cheering from the Ministerial benches)—either by • himself or by some other Honourable Member. I now ask the Honourable Member this question—whether the other Honourable Member who was to have taken his place, has also abandoned his intention ?—(loud cheers)—and whether his motion of want of confidence in his Majesty's Ministers is to be brought forward to-morrow? Mr. HUME, as far as he was concerned, had no hesitation in saying, that it would not; and although he considered that granting limited supplies would be tantamount to a vote of no confidence in Ministers, yet as his friends on that side of the House thought that that would not be a decisive indication of the opinion of the House, he had consented to alter the course he intended to adopt.—( Cheers.) Sir ROBERT PEEL wished to ask whether or not the motion of which the Hon. Member had given notice was to be brought forward to-morrow or not ?—(No, no.) If it was not 'intended to bring it forward, he thought it but right, after whet had taken place, that no time should be lost in naming the day on which the motion would be made.—( Great cheering.) Mr. HUNIE said that if it rested with him, he should bring it forward at the very first moment. THE PILOTAGE BILL. Earl RADNOR, after referringto a petition signed by 180 individuals, praying for some alteration in the law relative to pilotage, said that in presenting that petition he understood the Noble Duke opposite (Wellington) to say that he would do everything in his power to effect the object applied for, which he also understood he said he could do by virtue of his office as Warden of the Cinque Ports without a fresh Act of Parlia liament. He understood further, that it was the intention of his Majesty's Government to issue a Commission for inquiring into this subject ; and he begged to ask the Noble Duke, if that Commission would terminate its labours early enough to furnish a report, to enable the House to legislate upon the the question during the present session ? The Duke of WELLINGTON said the Noble Earl was mistaken, in supposing he had said that he could carry into execution the clauses of the Bill to which he referred. Ho had no power to force the pilots to reside at any fixed spot upon the coast, for as soon a 3 they were furnished with their warrants, they wero compelled to go afloat and cruise upon the coast off Dungenness. With reference to the Commission, he re plied that he believed the report would be furnished in suf ficient time to enable the House to regulate this measure during the present Session. ABOLITION OF OATHS BILL. Upon the motion of the Duke of RICHMOND this Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Monday next. The Duke of GORDON presented several petitions from Inverness and other places in Scotland in support of the Esta blished Church of that country. Earl FITZWILLIAM presented petitions from the ope ratives and master manufacturers of Pudsey, in Yorkshire, praying for an alteration in the Factory Bill. Lord MELBOURNE presented a petition from the hand loom 'weavers of some parish in Scotland praying for relief. The DUKE OF RICHMOND presented a Petition from the County of Kent for the Repeal of the Malt Tax. Also a petition from the same County against the present Tithe Sys tem. The House then adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER took the chair at three o'clock. On the motion of Mr. EMMERSON TENNENT, the Belfast and Crumlin Road Bill was read a second time. Mr. RUTH YEN brought in a Bill to enlarge and extend the powers of the Dublin Oil Gas Company. This being the last day for receiving petitions for private Bills, a great number were presented to the House. Mr. HODGES presented petitions from various places in the county of Kent, in favour of the Dover Railway. NORTHFLEET PIER. Mr. HODGES moved the second reading of the Northfleei Pier Bill. Sir W. GEARY, as we understood, opposed it, but from the noise in the House, we were unable to catch any of his observations. Mr. WARBURTON thought the Hon. Baronet opposite had furnished no just argument why they should not proceed with the second reading of this Bill. It was customary to send such Bills into Committee, and indeed Committees were established for the very purpose of enquiring into all the cir cumstances connected with private bills. The Hon. Member said it was the enterprise of an individual, and why should it not be so ? In proportion as he was successful in the enter prise the public would be benefited. Let any man doubting the advantage of such a bill look to the improvements on the Clyde, and observe the towns and villages rising up there, and then let him say whether he would do any public service by oppos ing this bill. Mr. WINKS said the arguments urged by the Hon. Member for Kent tended rather to recommend this bill to the adoption of the House, than to, induce it to refuse the second reading. It was said that the erection of this pier at North fleet would interfere with Gravesend, but the question was not one of partiality, but one of public convenience. Mr. HODGE S hoped the House would agree to the second reading for the purpose of sending the bill into Com mittee.) Sir W. GE ARY withdrew his opposition, and the Bill was read a second time. ---- 111VNCHESTER AND BURY RAILWAY. Mr. W. PATTEN presented a petition from the Manches ter, Bolton, and Bury Railway Company, praying for a grant to enable them to extend the r a il way ( as we un d erstood i t) 31 miles further, at right angles f rom t h e ra il way t h ey were originally appointed to construct. He moved for leave to bring in a bill for that purpose. Mr. LITTLETON begged to apologize to the House for being obliged to trespass on its attention on the introduction of a private bill, but he had to discharge a public duty. The petition was from the Manchester, Bolton, and Bury Railway Company, and prayed for power to make an additional railway. The Company had not complied w ith t h e stan di ng or d ers o f the House, a compliance with which was the only security the public had against any imposition on the part of the Bury Canal Company. In the year 1831, several par ties obtained a majority to petition for a Bill enabling them to convert the Canal into a Railway. He (Mr. L.) did not mean to say that they were guilty of any impropriety in ob taining that power. They have, however, been so rash in their speculations, that he did not think it safe to intrust them with the additional grant they sought for, especially as the Com pany had offered no security ; and the best proof that they cannot undertake this project with any hopes of success is this—th a t th e y arc una bl e t o fi n i s h t h e t hi rteen miles of the railway they first engaged to complete.—( Hear, heaT.) He was sure that in making this application he was not asking anything unreasonable. This perhaps was not a moment when the standing orders should be enquired into, but the present was a case of such a nature that he thought he was not tres passing on the House in calling their attention to it. The measure was so unusual, so extraordinary, and so prejudicial to the public interest, that he felt it his duty to resist it. Mr. W. PATTEN said he had applied for information on ' the subject, and when the proper time came he hoped to be able to answer the objections that had been raade. The SPEAKER was understood to say, that the proper way would be to refer the petition to the Committee, to in quire whether the standing orders of the House had been com plied with, and then the question would come in a more regu lar shape before the House. Lord MORPETH said that the question was, whether a Company incorporated for one purpose could apply for leave to bring in a Bill for a purpose entirely distinct from the original one. The company was incorporated for the construction of a rail way thirteen miles long, and the present petition was for leave to add to the railway another thirty-one miles, being to ano ther place twice th e di stance , an d i nvo l v i ng an expend i ture of three times the amount. If a corporate body applied for a purpose in which they could not legally act, they ought not to be allowed to usurp a right that did not belong to them. Mr. WILK S thought it better that the petition should be referred in the usual way to the Local Committee. Unless there was something requiring the interposition of the Com mittee upon standing orders they should not interfere. After some observations from Mr. WILSON PATTEN and Sir JOHN WROTTESLEY, the petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr. HALL presented several petitions from different parts of Monmouth, in favour of the Newport Harbour Bill. Mr. HUME brought up the report on the Chelsea Water Works Bill. Mr. D. JACKS ON presented a petition from Bandon, praying the House would take into consideration some mea sure for the protection of the Church of Ireland and its clergy, and complaining of the course that bad been pursued with respect to the Irish Church. POOR LAWS. The Marquis of CIIANDOg, in presenting a petition from the inhabit ants of the town of Stoke Pogis, said it was a pe tition of great importance, aff"::.eting the late Act of Parlia ment in its oper a ti on on the poor of the parish. In this parish the inh a bi tants had alw poor, and th ey a erefe liccted most loudly to the provisions d ot - 11)1%3110d them to of an A c t w hi c h c - i re o , unite themselves with 1i.3 s heen able to maintain their own BRIBERY AT ELECTIONS. Mr. GI SB ORN E rose to move for leave to bring in a bill to regulate the payment of expenses when an election is de. dared void on tho ground of bribery, intimidation, or violence. After the observations made by the lion. Baronet, (Sir G. Grey) who had introduced a similar Bill, he would not de tain the House by any remarks, but merely ask leave to