The Sun. — London, England, 1835-02-02 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. There cannot be a greater proof of that " dispen sation of doing wrong" which every Whig, like Cain with his mark, seems doomed to undergo than the forcing the public attention to the claims of Mr. Abercromby as of a very disinterested and high-flying character. He is, as we have always stated, an able man, and his political opinions have always been ex pressed with distinctness, and adhered to with steadi ness, but surely none but fools would attempt to place this gentleman. on the very lofty height of perfect free dom from patty bias. Is it not notorious, that he con sented to hold the principal office in a Court which he and his party knew (because they were the authors of the measure) was on the eve of abolition ; and did he not, after a few short months' possession of this sine cure, condescend to receive a pension of 2,000/. a year for doing nothing (1) except this temporary holding of this place pronounced to be one that had been for nearly a century useless ? Is this, 'Messrs. of the ultra-Radical faction, your parfait homme P We have always been ready to allow the reasonableness of the Irishman's request, who, when Dr. Shebbear gave him half-a-crown for holding an umbrella over him in the pillory, solicited an additional half-crown on ac count of the disgrace ; but we fear the public will not regard with our good nature the very high price paid to Mr. Abercromby, for the disgrace of having played the part of umbrella to the Scotch Court of Exche quer.— Times. The Tories have been blowing their feeble penny trumpets into a distant resemblance of clamour ; and expending their precious breath and most " sweet voices" in order to induce the country to believe that a " re-action" has taken place in their favour. They have so often repeated their own weak inventions re specting the abated estimation of Reform and Re formers in public opinion, that, like other dealers in the same species of ingenious, but not over-honest fictions, they almost believe their own idle and chime rical fable, Re-action, to be true. We shall be par ticularly obliged by some of the more sober-minded of the party—some whom the air of Downing-street has not made quite intoxicated—if they will descend from - the clouds and point out in a substantial shape the tangible proofs of that " re-action," the couleur de-rose visions of which so pleasantly sooth the " day dreams" of their party. " Speak unto us smooth things" is their cry, as it was of the perishing triflers of Israel to the Prophets of old— " prophecy deceits." 'Where, we ask them, is the proof of pretended " re-action ?" Is it in the rejec tion of an unparalleled number of Ministerial Candi dates ? Is it in the rejection of Mr. Dawson, for Devonport ?—of Sir C. Rowley,- for Portsmouth ? of Sir George Cockburn, for Plymouth ?—of Sir Ed ward Owen, for Sandwich ?—of Messrs. Wortley, Planta, and M. Fitzgerald ?—of Lord Tullamore -- and, finally, of the great gun of the Military Cabi net—Sir George Murray ? Let us contrast this dis graceful repudiation of Ministers and their under strappers with the triunrshant return of Mr. Tennyson for Lambeth—of Mr. Duncombe, for Finsbury, with out expense ; of Mr. Hume, for Middlesex ; and of the two popular candidates for Manchester—Messrs. P. Thomson and Phillips, neither of whOm have had to pay one farthing on account of their election. If this be " re-action," we have undoubtedly no objec tion to the word. As much more of this sort of " re action," as can possibly be agreeable to the Tories, will be agreeable to us.—Morning Advertiser. The " russe" by which Lord John Russell has in stalled himself in the place of leader of the Opposi tion, and signified the same to the public, still continues the subject of general conversation,—a subject of mer riment or of mortification, according tio the characters and position of the different parties who discuss it. We can well imagine, for instance, the total absence of the former feeling in the mind of Mr. Spring Rice when the letters of the Noble Lord, and the answer of the Right Hon. Gentleman, Mr. Abercromby, first met his eye. That Lord John Russell should thus complacently assume the Leadership of the Opposition must have been startling enough to Mr. Spring Rice ; but that he should not only arrogate to himself this dignity, but proceed to dispose of the Right Hon. ex-Secretary's claim to the Chair in faveur of ano ther, must have exceeded even the notions which the late Cabinet entertained on the subject of reci procal good faith and fair dealing among colleagues. Had it been decided to set aside Mr. Spring Rice's claims to the chair in favour of those of some other person, the Right Hon. Gentleman had aspired (and we think with some reason) at least to the post of leader of the Opposition ; and, perhaps, might have been satisfied. to fall back upon this, albeit (Heaven knows) no very great honour as that Opposition is now constituted. But to be thus jockeyed out of both— ".-Speitltership and Leadership—and by Lord John Russell ! " But what (say poor Mr. Littleton's friends)--what is that in comparison with our wrongs ? Is it not enough that Lord Grey and Lord Althorp should once have broken their words plighted to our friend ? Talk not to us of Mr. Abercromby's being a more favourite candidate with the Move ment. Are poor Littleton's exertions to conciliate them, as evinced in his ' intimate friendship' and ' confidential correspondence' with O'Connell—are they all to go for nothing ? Has not his very portrait been placed as the frontispiece to Burke's second vo lume of the ' History of the Commoners of Great Britain,' as the best ' pendant' to that of Sir Charles Manners Sutton, which adorns the first—and is this ' nothing ? Is this no evidence of the public estimation in which Mr. Littleton is held, and of his undeniable claims to the Chair ?" But, seriously, we are not as tonished at the clamour and disunion which this pro ceeding upon the part of Lord John Russell has caused in the camp of the Destructives ; at the anger of Mr, Littleton ; or the disgust of Mr. Spring Rice. To be overreached by Lord John Russell and to be postponed to Mr. Abercromby are two stages on the road to degradation which are not easily borne at one and the same time, and may well justify the angry words and sullen looks which, all yesterday, marred the harmony at Brookes's, and the hilarity at Hol land House. Since the defeat of Lord Palmer iton in Hampshire no event has caused so many doubts as to the perfection of the Reform Bill, or the purity of Whiggism ! " But the worse remains behind," say the friends both of Mr. Spring Rice and of Mr. Littleton. " The claims of our friends have been set aside in favour of one sure to be beaten in the trial. You cannot surely expect that we—or any moderate Whig—should vote for Mr. Abercromby,— and Sir Charles Manners Sutton will accordingly walk over the course." That this will, almost literally, be the case we entertain but little doubt. The intimation given so anxiously in the Globe of Saturday evening to Mr. Abercromby's friends to attend punctually at two o'clock on Thursday, the 19th inst., in the House of Commons, will act in every Conservative society where that journal is received as a summons to each true friend of his country and of his King, who has a seat in the present Parliament, to postpone all otheis to this paramount duty—to defeat the Destructives in this their first attempt against the peace and happiness of the State.—Morning Post. We quarrel not, as we have already said, with Sir Charles Manners Sutton on account of his Toryism. His principles were no secret to the Reformers who voted him into the chair ; and it was never understood "that the condition of his election to preside over a Re form Parliament was that he should become a Refor mer himself. But Sir Charles Manners Sutton, though not called on to renounce his principles, from the moment of his being chosen Speaker of the late House of Commons, was in honour bound to identify himself with it, and more especially to avoid all partici pation in intrigues tending to terminate the existence of the body of which he was the organ, and of whose interests he was the guardian. Is it not notorious that Sir Charles Manners Sutton was deeply implicated in the intrigues for the dismissal of the Melbourne Ministry, and that he took an active share in the formation of the present Ministry ? And as the change of Ministry could not but lead to a disso lution, he was thus contributing to the destruction of e -bogy of which he was the guardian. It is a well 4iiiblvn factilhat when some members of the Corpora _,on of Bridgwater, in Somerset, heard of the dismis ' Asil of the 'Aletaourne Administration, and that the r ' . Tories were again in office, a member of that Corpora. , . , THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 2, 1835. charged by the plaintiff for the hire of a cart and two horses for several years, against which no figures were entered in the deceased's books. The defendants proved by one of their clerks that the testator had agreed to charge the two horses as for one only, because one was too weak for the work undertaken to be performed, and other witnesses proved that the charge made by the plaintiff was exorbitant. Under these circumstances the Jury found for the de fendant. The plaintiff then applied to the Court to be re lieved from the payment of costs. Mr. Sergeant WILDE now showed cause against the rule. Mr. Sergeant ACHERLEY spoke in support of the rule. Rule discharged. attack on his father, he certainly did lay hold of him and put him into the street. This statement was corroborated by Mr. Newman, one of the clerks belonging to the establishment, who described the complainant's conduct to be of the most improper description. Mr. Beaumont, sen., who was present, explained to the Mac , istiate the grounds upon which the complainant made a claim against the Directors, stating that it arose out of some transactions connected with an insurance on the life of Mr. Long Wellesley, for which the defendant, in accord ance with the rules of the office, had been some time ago liberally and sufficiently remunerated. Mr. DYER, having been assured that no more violence was used towards the complainant than was sufficient to secure his ejectment, said it appeared clear the complainant was the party who had been in error, for if he had a claim against any one, the law was open to him ; and, therefore, when ordered to leave the office, he should have done so immediately. The case was then dismissed. tion applied to a clerk high in the Treasury, begging him to send down a couple of gentlemen to canvas the electors, as Tayleure, one of the then mem bers, had made up his mind to resign, and Tynte, the other, held his seat on a very precarious te nure ; and that that Treasury Clerk applied to Sir Charles Manners Sutton, Men Speaker of the House of Commons, who immediately selected a Mr. J. Broad wood, and a Lieutenant F. M. Martyn, of the 2d Life Guards, as fit persons for canvassing Bridgwater on Tory•principles. This Sir Charles Manners 'Sutton did, when the Duke of Wellington was discharging all the duties of the three Secretaries of State, and at least thirty-two days before the dissolution of the House of Commons of which he was Speaker. Was this con ' duct—we will not say decent or decorous—honour able or honest ? Was it for him, of all men, during the prorogation of Parliament, when he was more particularly bound to watch over the interests of those whom he represented, not Merely to plot the dissolution of Parliament, but to become as it were, a general election-agent for the Tories ? What ties, after this, are to be deemed binding ? A Speaker, during a prorogation, busily employed in ma naging the elections for a new Parliament ! The ties between him and the House are not dissolved ; and yet, unmindful of them, he is recruiting for a new House ! We doubt whether the annals of Parlia tnent furnish an instance of conduct equally indelicate and discreditable. Were the Reformers to choose this man a second time, they would deservedly be the objects of universal scorn. No ; the Reformers cannot so far stultify themselves I A press of matter compels us reluctantly to dismiss Sir Charles Manners Sutton for the present ; but as the subject is any thing but exhausted, we shall resume it to-morrow.—Morning Chronicle. COURT OF CHANCERY. FIELDER V. SMITH. This case was very fully argued to-day before the LORD CHANCELLOR, upon the point whether it was a proper one for an appeal to this Court as a Court of Equity, by Mr. WAKEFIELD upon the part of the plaintiff, and Mr. JACOBS for the defendant. The LORD CHANCELLOR decided that the case was one in which there was no ground for an appeal. ARRANGEMENT OF BUSINESS. A motion, partly heard on a former day, praying a dis covery of papers from the Fishmongers' Company was then about to be proceeded with. Mr. COOPER had personally no objection to the motion going on, but as this was the day on which the junior Bar claimed to have their motions heard, he protested against the hearing of this cause being established as a precedent. The LORD CHANCELLOR admitted there was reason for this, as the day was undoubtedly the peculiar property• of the junior Bar. His Lordship thought, however, that this was a good opportunity to mention his intention of sitting on the Thursday, Friday, and Saturday of the week after nest (that is, the three days before the first Seal), for the purpose of hearing motions. His Lordship added, that he was the better able to do this, because he had now reduced the appeals set down before him, to the number of five, in cluding in these the Attorney-General v. Shore, and the matter of Lord Skelmersdale. In this state of the busi ness, too, it was also his intention to devote two days, in stead of one, in succeeding weeks, for the purpose of hear ing motions, there being, as he understood, some accumula tion, which it was expedient to get rid He hoped this arrangement would prove satisfactory to the Bar. Mr. COOPER, on the part of the Bar, expressed himself perfectly satisfied. The arrangement would obviate every inconvenience. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT. DONOVAN V. DONOVAN. • _ The testator, James Donovan, a very wealthy merchant, of Dublin, lately deceased, bequeathed the residue of his personal estate to his second son James. By a codicil he bequeathed five thousand pounds to his grandson Henry, the eldest son of the testator's eldest son Alexander, and five hundred pounds a piece to each of the children of his daughter, Mrs. Braddell. By a second codicil, he gave one thousand pounds to his grandson, James Tertius, the son of James. His third codicil recited that his property had greatly increased, and by it he gave thirty thousand pounds to his son James, and divided the residue between his sons Alexander and James, and then occurred the passage of this eodicil upon which the question in the cause turned : " I hereby give to each of my grandchildren alive at my death the full sum of one thousand pounds sterling, with one thousand pounds already bequeathed by my codicil to my grandson, James Tertius Donovan, that is, two thousand pounds to James Tertius Donovan, and one thousand pounds to each of my other grandchildren, the children of my se cond son James, the interest thereon to be applied to their education, the principal to be paid to them at the age of twenty-one, or sooner, with their father's consent and ap probation." A fourth codicil, principally relating to his grandson Henry, recited that the testator had " by his will,' bequeathed to him the sum of six thousand pounds. The question was, whether only the children of James, or all the grandchildren of the testator by all his children, were en titled to one thousand pounds each under the words of the third codicil. Mr. ROLFE, in support of the former construction, con tended that some previous inquiries were necessary con cerning the state of the testatsr's family and assets. His HONOUR was far from saying the construction of the third codicil was clear. But the last codicil appeared to him to put a construction upon the bequest in favour of all the grandchildren. Upon the whole, therefore, his Honour declared that all the grandchildren of the testator were en titled to a bequest of 1,0001. each. ROLLS' COURT. BAILEY V. GROTE. Mr. BICREESTETH moved in this case that the defend ants, Martin, Grote, and Rigley, might be permitted to inspect the particular processes carried on at the crape ma nufactory at Ponder's End, near Enfield, and that the plaintiff's workmen might be ordered to facilitate such in spection, and that the plaintiff might be restrained from availing himself of the advice and assistance of Mr. Kinder sley as his Counsel. In support of the motion the Learned Gentleman proceeded to state the facts of the case, which were briefly as follows. The plaintiff and the defendants were partners in a great crape manufactory, in which a sum exceeding 200,0001. was embarked. The partnership con cern was carried on under articles dated the 4th of July, 1830. In 1833 disputes arising the plaintiff filed his bill to have the partnership affairs wound up under the direction of this Court. Shortly after the filing of the bill an application was made for the appointment of a ma nager or receiver, and an order, referring the matter to the Master, was made, who by his report found that the plaintiff ought to be appointed manager of the manufac tory at Ponder's End, and the defendant Martin the manager of the manufactory at Norwich. Other parties were appointed managers of branch manufactories at Yar mouth, Bungay, and Bocking. Different processes in the manufacture of crape were carried on at these separate manufactories, and the defendant Martin, wishing to be come acquainted with that carried on at Ponder's End, ap plied to the Vice-Chancellor for leave to inspect that manu factory. By an arrangement between the Learned - Counsel for the different parties, it was acrreed that the defendant should be permitted to attend at Ponder's End for a certain limited period of three days at three separate times. The defendant had availed himself of this arrangement ; but, not being satisfied with the result of his inspection , he now sought by the present motion to have a further opportunity allowed him. Mr. PEMBERTON appeared in support of the motion for parties having a like interest. Motion refused, but without costs. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. THE KING V. BRYANT AND ANOTHBR. In this case the defendants were indicted at the Middle sex 'Sessions for a conspiracy alleged to have been entered into by them so long as the sth of Geo. IV., to defraud divers persons of their goods and chattels ; and, among others, two persons of the name of Davis and Grimsburgh. A rule for a certiorari was obtained in the early part of the term by Sir John Campbell to remove the case from the Sessions into this Court. A rule bad since been granted to discharge the rule for the certiorari, and issue a procedendo. Sir JOHN CAMPBELL now showed cause against the lat ter rule, and Mr. Platt was heard in support of it. The COURT thought that the rule for the procedendo oughtOto be discharged ; and their Lordships added that the charge against the defendants was of the flimsiest nature. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. EXECUTORS OF CLARKE V. CROLY AND SHARMAN. The. plaintiff in this case was the executor of a person named Clark, a barge, cart, and waggon owner. The de fendants were merchants in the city, who bad employed the testator in the way of his business, by jobbing his waggons and carts. It appeared at the trial that there was an un settled account between the parties, that the plaintiff claimed 918/. as due to the estate of Clark, whilst thaefendants only admitted 5001. or odd to be owing, which sum they paid into Court. The principal sum in dispute was one GREEN V. GLASBROOKE. Mr. Serjeant TARDY obtained on a former day a rule isi calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the sum of 2401., and two sums of 101. each, that had been paid into Court in lieu of bail, should not be now taken out of Court, on the ground that the affidavit on which the defendant was held to bail was defective. Mr. Sergeant WILDE tiliS morning showed cause against the rule.—Rule discharged. EXCHEQUER COURT. DICAS V. LAWSON. Some misunderstanding having, from a statement made by Mr. Lee, the plaintiff's counsel, arisen relative to the of the compromise entered into between the p arties yesterday, The * COURT considered, in the absence of Sir John Campbell, the Counsel for the defendant, that the rule had better be enlarged to the first day of next term. — Rule enlarged. The COURT did not rise till a late hour. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GFILDHALL. Mrs. Sandell, of Little Distaff-lane, on a former occa sion appeared to show cause why she had refused to pay her poor-rates. Mrs. Sandell said that when she came into the parish four years ago, the house was assessed at I/. 15s. a quarter, her rental being 451., but her landlord had thought fit to raise her rent to 601., and the parish to assess her at 71. 10s. a quarter, as for a rental of 100/. The house had not been used as an accommodation-house for five months, and the charge was quite unreasonable. The house was worth only 451. .Mr. Crackland, the overseer, admitted the house had been assessed differently from other houses on account of its being a house of ill-fame ;he could not take less than 71. 10s. without consulting the vestry. Mr. Alderman Cow AN said that its fair value was pro bably 451., at which the landlord let it, though, on finding for what purpose it was used, he raised the rent to 601. When the parish assessed it at 1001., while the houses around it were assessed at 35/. and 401., and the next house, which was a much larger one than Mrs. Sandell's, and one of the same character, was rated at only 901., he could not hold that the rate was an equal and fair one, and therefore it was illegal, and he was not bound to enforce it. There was no concealing the fact that the parish were seeking to get rid of the house by this mode ; but, in fact, by taking this ineffectual method they were really doing what they did not intend—participating in the wages of iniquity. The Solicitor said the same course had been pursued with houses of this kind in St. Anne's, Soho, and the Magistrates , . Bow-street had enforced payment without a scruple. Mr. Alderman CowAN finally refused to enforce payment Q UEEN SQUARE. Moses Ray, residing in Princes-street, Lambeth, was charged as follows :—Policeman, 124 L, on going his rounds, heard the cry of " Murder" issuing from the house where the prisoner lodged : on proceeding to the spot he observed Ray struggling with and beating another man, who was nearly covered with blood ; he separated them, and in endeavouring to take the prisoner into custody he was seized round the waist by him, and, before he could extricate himself, the prisoner drew the cutlass from the side of witness, and held it up as if he intended to make a thrust at him with it. Witness, however, caught hold of the blade, and with assistance forced the deadlyinstrament frqm the grasp of the prisoner, who then made all the use in his power of his legs, and great difficulty was experienced in conveying him to the station. The inspector recognised him as an old offender in this particular, and informed the Magistrate that he had visited Brixton for similar outrages. He (inspector) feared that the prisoner would one day commit murder. The landlord of the house also bore testimony to the desperate character of the prisoner, who was forthwith committed to the mill for one month, in default of paying the fine inflicted on him. lIATTON-GARDEN. On Saturday, Isabella Watson was charged with as saulting her sister, Ellen Watson, and threatening her life. A creature in the garb of man, who at the station-house had given the name of Bill Chapman, was placed by her side, and complained of for being a common cheat and im pastor, and creating a disturbance. It appeared that the two Watsons got drunk and fought together. The MAGISTRATE said, that as they were both disor derly characters, he would not take cognizance of the charge and desired them to go about their business. Mr. Oakley, inspector of the E division, then stated that although the thing before them was attired in man's apparel, he had ascertained that it was a woman. Mr. BENNETT—Who was very much s urprised--lookeil steadfastly at the prisoner, and asked her name ? Pri soner—(speaking in a rough manner,) -:--It is Mary Chapman. Mr. BENNETT—I never saw a figure more like a man, and the voice is manly. Mr. Oakley—l have known her at least ten years, and she always appeared in a dress similar to the one she now wears—namely, a hat, smock-frock, trousers, or knee breeches, and until last night I always supposed her to be a man ; she is known all over England as a ballad-singer, and a crier of " The last dying speeches," &c. Mr. BENNETT—She may be a disorderly and disreputa ble character, which, in fact, her dressing as a man clearly shows ; but I know of no law to punish her. Mr. Oakley—She travels the country with the woman Isabella Watson, and they are both known at every race course and fair as ballad-singers, and considered, to be man and wife. Mr. BENNETT—She may have more than one reason for dressing in that manner, and passing as the husband of the woman Isabella Watson, and I wish it was in my power to imprison her. Mr. Oakley—For upwards of seven years she has occa-, sionally lodged with Watson, at Mr. Thompson's, in Buckeridge-street, St. Giles's, and they always passed with him as man and wife ; moreover, she smokes ; and when Watson gives her any offence she beats her and blackens her eyes, though Watson is much taller, and apparently stronger. Mr. BENNETT.--It is a very extraordinary case. What have you to say, prisoner? Prisoner—lsabella has lived with me as my companion for many years. Mr. BENNETT—Why do you dress as a man? Prisoner I own I am disguised, and it was owing to the cruelty of a father-in-law that I was first dressed in this manner. Mr. BENNETT—When a man dresses as a woman, or a woman attires herself as a man, it creates a strong suspi cion that it is done for a bad purpose. Prisoner—l never did harm to any person ; I hive been all over the kingdom, and never was in prison in my life before. Mr. BENNETT—WeII, I should advise you to be care ful. If I could punish you, I would. Prisoner—l should not have adopted this disguise, if my father had not ill treated me. Isabella Watson—The poor fellow has been with me hundreds of miles as my companion, and he never got into a scrape before. Mr. BENNETT-It is a case that puzzles me, but I must discharge the prisoner. The prisoner, who was chewing tobacco, then bowed his head, and walked out of the office with Isabella, who ex claimed, " Never mind, my lad, if we live a hundred years we will be in this manner." Watson is about five feet seven inches high, with rather an intelligent but sod dened countenance ; and the prisoner not more than five feet high. Her hair is Egli- t brown, and cut short, the same as a man's ; and she has the gait of a man, and looks like a costermonger. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. An individual named Thomas Wright came before Mr. DYER to charge John Beaumont, Esq., of the County Fire Office, with an assault. The complainant said he had a claim against the Direc tors, and he had called once or twice at the office to get it settled. On the last occasion he saw Mr. Beaumont, the defendant, and after some conversation on the subject high words arose, which ended by Mr. Beaumont forcibly thrust ing him out of the place, in which process his shirt.became torn and his arm injured. From the explanation given by Mr. Beaumont, it ap peared that the complainant made a preposterous demand of additional remuneration on account of some transactions with the office, for which he had at the time been amply rewarded. In order to enforce the assumed claims he took the liberty of coming to the office and behaving with great rudeness. He (defendant) went out to speak to him, and then the complainant used expressions of great vulgarity, and of such a nature as no gentleman could submit to. Defendant, as well as Mr. Beaumont, sen., desired the complainant to leave the place, but he continued his offen sive conduct, and on placing his arm in an attitude which he (defendant) considered to indicate a design of personal UNION-HALL. On Saturday George and Thomas Burton, two brothers, were committed for trial for stealing a pig, the property of Mr. Fox, a farmer at Mattingham, in Kent. Two pigs were at first missing, but one found its way home again, when the farmer traced the footmarks from whence it came, and found the other pig in the prisoners' stye. The farmer stated that the pig that came home always displayed much sagacity, and the supposition was, that the pig got out of the prisoners' stye, jumped over the little gate, as it was very expert at a leap, and toddled home, when it began to frisk about, evidently pleased at being in its old quarters. THE NEW PARLIAMENT. LIST OF THE MEMBERS RETURNED FOR THE NEW PARLIAMENT, WITH PERSONAL NOTICES. The Tories are distinguished thus (t), and the doubtful thas (d). IRELAND. ANTRIM.—(t) Hon. John Bruce Richard O'Neill (only brother and heir presumptive of Earl O'Neill), a major general in the army; and (d) the Earl of Belfast, son to the Marquess of Donegal. ARMAGH ( COUNTY.)—Lord Acheson, eldest son of the Earl of Gosford ; and (t) William Verner, Esq., of Church hill, a lieutenant colonel in the army.—The possessor of ex tensive estates, and the especial favourite of the Orangemen of the North, Colonel Verner exercises great influence, and has represented his native county for several years. His father, the late James Verner, Esq., sat in the Irish Parlia ment previously to the Union, and served at different periods the office of high sheriff for five counties—Armagh, Meath, Monaghan, Dublin, and Tyrone, in all of which the present Colonel Verner is a considerable landed proprietor. ARMAGH.—Leonard Dobbin, Esq., agent to the Bank of Ireland.—This gentleman resides near the town, and has greatly embellished the neighbourhood. His improved grounds are quite an ornament to Armagh, and a place of re creation to its inhabitants. ATHLONE.—(t) Captain Mathew. . BANDON BRIDGE.-(t) J. D. Jackson, Esq., K. C., assis taut-barrister of the county of Londonderry. BELFAST.—(t) John Emerson Tennent, Esq., of Tempo, in the county of Fermanagh; and J. M'Cance, Esq.—Mr. Tennent, under his own name, Emerson, acquired reputation in the literary world, as author of several volumes of Travels in the Levant, and of a History of Modern Greece. He is son of a merchant at Belfast, and obtained his name and for tune by marriage with the wealthy heiress of William Tennent, Esq., of Tempo. CARLOW ( COUNTY). --(t) Colonel Bruen, of Oak-park (probably the finest deer park in Ireland) ; and (t) Thomas Kavanagh, Esq., of Borris.—Mr. Kavanagh, brother-in-law of the Marquess of Ormonde and of the Earl of Clancarty, ranks, both in fortune and descent, among the most influential Commoners in Ireland. His possessions in the counties of Carlow, Kilkenny, and Wexford (held by his progenitors from time immemorial), are cf great extent and value, and he de scends from, and represents the ancient kings of Leinster. He is the first of his family who conformed to the Established Church.—The Bruens rose to eminence, and realized a large fortune in India. The present Colonel Bruen is son-in-law of his colleague, Mr. Kavanagh. CARLOW.—(O—F. Bruen, Esq., brother to Col. Bruen. CAVAN.—(I) Henry Maxwell, Esq., of Farnham, nephew and heir-presumptive to Lord Farnham ; and (t) John Young, Esq., of Bailieborough Castle, eldest son of Sir William Young, Bart. CARRICKRERGUS.—(t) Peter Kirk, Esq. CASHEL.—Mr. Sergeant Perrin, a very eminent barrister. CLARE.—William Nugent Macnamara, of Doolen, Esq., Major of the Clare Militia : and Cornelius O'Brien, Esq., of Birchfield. CLONMEL.—Dominick Ronayne, Esq., barrister-at-law. COLERAINE.—WiIIiam Taylor Copeland, Esq., an alderman of London. _ _ Conic (Cout.ry).—Feargus O'Connor, Esq., of Fort Robert, barrister-at-law, nephew of General Arthur O'Connor; and Garret Standish Barry, Esq., of Lemlara.—The defeated candidates are Lord Bernard, son of the Earl of Bandon; and John Longfield, Esq., of Longueville, who inherits the estates of the late Lord Longueville. His Lordship's nearest heir was, we believe, the celebrated Arthur O'Connor; but that gentleman's political opinions, liberal and uncompromising, displeased the Tory Peer, and caused the alienation of his estate.—Mr. Barry, the representative of a most respectable branch of the influential name of Barry, is nearly related to Colonel De Lacy Evans, M. P. for Westminster, and to Wil ham Rode, Esq., M.P. for Limerick. CORK 6CITY).—(t) James Chatterton, Esq. ; and (t) J. Leycesteinsq.—Colonel Chatterton, who commands the 4th Royal Irish Dragoons, is the only brother of Sir William Abraham Chatterton, Bart., of Castle Mahon. DONEGAL.—(t) Sir Edmund Samuel Hayes, Bart., of Drumboe-castle; and (t) Edward Michael Conolly, Esq., of Castletown.—Colonel Conolly, eldest son of Admiral Sir Thomas Pakenham, and first cousin to the Earl of Longford and to the late Duchess of Wellington, assumed his present surname upon inheriting, at the decease of the accomplished Lady Louisa Conolly, Castletown and other great estates. One of the Conolly family, the Right Hon. William Conolly, was speaker of the Irish House of Commons in the time of Queen Anne. DowN.—(d) Lord Arthur Moyes,William Hill, next bro ther to the Marquis of Downshire, and heir-apparent to the barony of Sandys; and (t) Lord Castlereagh, eldest son of the Marquis of Londonderry. DOWNPATRICK.—D. Kerr, Esq. DROGHEDA.—Andrew Carew O'Dwyer, Esq., barrister-at law. DUBLIN (COUNTY). —Christopher Fitzsimon, Esq., of Glencullen ; and George Evans, Esq., of Portrane.—Mr. C. Fitzsimon, the son-in-law of Mr. O'Connell, is of a most re spectable family, and esteemed a person of ability. He is no wise allied to his hon, namesake, the member for the King's county, whose grandfather realized in trade, in Dublin, what ever property his descendant now possesses.—Mr. Evans de scends from the ennobled family of Carbery, and enjoys a con siderable estate in the county of Dublin. He is brother to Mr. Evans, the Commissioner of the Bankruptcy Court, and brother-in-law to Sir Henry Parnell. His uncle, George Evans, Esq., of Portrane, formerly represented the Queen's county, and his grandfather, Eyre Evans, Esq., sat in Parlia ment more than a hundred years ago for the county of Limerick. DUBLIN (UNIVERSITY.)—(t.) The Right Hon. Frederick Shaw, Recorder of Dublin ; and (t) Thomas Lefroy, Esq., LL.D. and K.C.—Mr. Shaw is second son of Sir Robert Shaw, Bart., an eminent banker in the same city, whose father, a clerk in the Post-office, realized a considerable for tune. Sir Robert Shaw, who married the daughter and heir ess of Abraham Wilkinson, Esq., a gentlemen of great opu lence, represented the city of Dublin for several years. He strenuously opposed the Union in the Irish Parliament, and his votes in the Imperial were generally liberal, particularly on the Catholic question, of which he was a supporter. Mr. Frederick Shaw is a man of acknowledged ability and high attainments, and, were he freed froni the trammels of the Cor poration ,of Dublin, would probably be found amongst the ablest denouncers of his country's wrongs, instead of lending, as lie does now, his talents to uphold them. DUBLIN (CITY). —Daniel O'Connell, Esq. of Derrynane Abbey, " The Giant Agitator ; and Edward Southwell Ruth ven, Esq., father of the Member for Kildare. DUNDALK.—WiIIiam Sharman Crawford, Esq. of Crawford burn. DUNGANNON.—The Hon. James Knox, a lieutenant-colonel in the army, fourth son of the Earl of Ranfurly. DUNGABVAN.—MichaeI O'Loghlen, Esq., late Solicitor- General. - ENNIS.—H. Bridgman, Esq. ENNISKILLEN.—(t) The Hon. Arthur Henry Cole, brother to the Earl of Enniskillen. FERMANAGH (COUNTY).—(t) Mervyn Archdall, Esq., of Castle Archdall ; and (t) Viscount Cole, eldest son of the Earl of Enniskillen.—The Archdall family, one of great in fluence in the North of Ireland, have represented Fermanagh for more than a century. The present member is nephew of General Archdall, who was returned to Parliament eleven times by that county. GALWAY ( CouNTy).—Thomas Barnewall Martin, Esq., of Ballinahinch Castle ' • and John James Bodkin, Es q . o f Quarrymount, formerly M. P. for the town of Galway.—Mr. Martin is the son of the renowned and eccentric Richard Mar tin, so celebrated for duelling and humanity, equally ready to pull a hair-trigger or protect a bullock. The possessions of Mr. Martin in the county of Galway may be called a territory, as they embrace an immense tract of mountain and arable land, They produce very fine marble, and are remarkable for that wild race of hardy animals so well known as Connemara poness. GALWAY.—Andrew H. Lynch, Esq., a Chancery barrister o f high reputation, son-in-law of the late Charles Butler the conveyancer; and Martin Joseph Blake, Esq. of Brook-lodge. KERBY (COUNTY).—Frederick William Mullins, Esq., of Beaufort House, cousin to Lord Ventry ; and Morgan John O'Connell. Esq., eldest son of John O'C onne ll, E sq ., o f Grena, and nephew to the Member for Dublin. The pecu liarity of the title borne by the defeated candidate—the Knight of Kerry—its acknowledged antiquity, and its total dissimili tude from any distinguishing appellation of honour existing in E n gland, have frequently claimed attenti on an d exc i te d muc h curiosity. It was originally obtained by one of the Geraldines, and it is supposed to have been conferred by the Earl Palatine of Desmond, who enjoyed Jura Regalia, and, by his own au thority, appointed his vice-comes and all other subordinate officers, who acted in their Lord's name. The Palatine of Desmond likewise granted the same honour to the progenitor of the present Knight of Glyn, and to the White Knight, whose representative is the Earl of Kingston. KILDARE (COUNTY). —Edward Ruthven, Esq., of Ballyfair House, son of the Member for Dublin; and Richard More O'Ferrall, Esq., of Ballyna. KILKENNY ( COUNTY).—Hon. Pierce Butler, of Ballyonra, brother to the Earl of Kilkenny ; and William Francis Finn, Esq., barrister-at-law, brother-in-law of Daniel O'Connell, Esq., M. P. KILKENNY (CITY). —Richard Sullivan, Esq., a merchant of Kilkenny. KINSALE.—(t) Colonel Thomas. KING'S COUNTY.—Nicholas Fitzsimon, Esq., and Hon. J. C. Wcstcnra.—The liberal constituency of this county have again elected Mr. Fitzsimon, a gentleman of moderate fortune, and still mare moderate ability. Considering, however, the usual complaint made of modern Houses of Commons, he is gifted with one high attribute for a member of Parliament, impenetrable taciturnity. Colonel Westenra is the son of Lord Rossmore, a nobleman, who has long supported the public cause with zeal, firmness, and ability. The new mem ber for the King's County pledges himself to a similar line of conduct. Lord Oxmantown, who retired from the contest, is the eldest son of Laurence Parsons, Earl of Rosse, now the representative of the notorious Sir William Parsons, who founded the family in the reign of Elizabeth, and who, from a clerkship in a public office, became a ruler of Ireland, as one of the Lords Justices, during a period of ruthless persecution. For nearly two centuries, the Kings County had been a close borough in the hands of the Parsons family, so far at least as the return of one member; but' the Reform Bill roused the spirit of the middle classes, and at the last election an effort was mad to break the bondage—all but successfully, Lord Oxmantown being then enabled to maintain the second place only on the poll, and to secure his election by some half-dozen votes. On the present occasion, he has not dared to appear at all on the husiings. LEITRIM.-Samuel White, Esq., of Portland; and Lord Clements, eldest son of the Earl of Leitrim.—Mr. White is son of the celebrated Luke White, who, from the humble station of a pamphlet hawker, died worth a million of money at least: - Mr. White acquired his immense wealth with an un impeachable character, and lived for many years in the full en joyment of it. He purchased \ the splendid estate of Lord Carhampton, called Luttrelstown (which name he changed to Woodlands), in the county of Dublin. LIMERICK ( COUNTY).—Hon. Richard Hobart Fitzgibbon, Colonel of the Limerick Militia, second son of the celebrated Lord Clare, and W. S. O'Brien, Esq. LIMERICK. —Wm. Roche, Esq., and David Roche, Esq.— This great commercial town has again returned her two staunch Reformers. Mr. Wm. Roch (of a different family to that of his Hon. C3lleague) is a younger brother of the late John Roche, Esq., one of the most respectable and opulent merchants in Dublin, and was himself formerly an eminent banker in the city of Limerick. His free and entirely un sought-for election is the strongest attestation of respect his fellow-citizens could have paid to public virtue and private worth. LISBURNE:—(t) Henry Meynell, Esq., Captain IL N. LONDONDERRY (COUNTY).—(t) Sir Robert Bateson, Bart., of Belvoir-park, and (t) Theobald Jones, Esq., Captain R.N., of Boragh. LONDONDERRY (CITY)—Sir Robert Alexander Ferguson, Bart. LoNuroßD—(t) Lord Forbes (eldest son of the Earl of Granard), a Major-General in the army, and Lord-Lieute nant of the county; and (t) Anthony Lefroy, Esq., son of the member for Dublin University, and son-in-law of Lord Lorton. LOUTII (COUNTY). —Sir Patrick Bellew, Bart., of Bar meath, Lord-Lieutenant of the count• ; and Richard M. Bel lew, Esq., only brother of the other member. MALLOW.—Charles Denham Orlando Jephson, Esq., of Mallow Castle, the descendant of a very ancient Hampshire family, which settled in Ireland about two centuries back, and which has represented Mallow in Parliament ever since, with out the interruption of a single generation. The late Major Jephson was distinguished as a dramatic writer. Mayo.—Sir William Brabazon, Bart., of Brabazon Park, and D. Browne, Esq. MEATII.—Henry Grattan, Esq., of Moyrath ; and Morgan O'Connell, Esq., second son of the Member for Dublin. Mr. Grattan is younger son of the celebrated patriot, statesman, and orator—Henry Grattan, whose name will live in his native land while one single heart's blood warms one single bosom there. In the words of Mr. Croker, the Ex- Secretary of the Admiralty, and where could we find more eloquent, " His history is now identified with his country's, and even his cha racter may be assimilated to her's. A mind impetuous and de termined ; views not always correct, but always generous ; an eloquence peculiar and popular, in a delivery somewhat fan tastical, but most impressive ; geatle manners ; a feeling heart ; undaunted spirit ; in private, most of what is amiable ; in public, much of what is great. Flattered and reviled, alter nately and intemperately, he has been worshipped and branded, as a saviour and as a traitor—that exaggeration, this false hood." Christopher Drake, Esq., of Roristown, the seconder of Mr. Grattan, represents the ancient family of Drake, of Drakerath. He is a gentleman of independent fortune, and equally independent principles. MONAGHAN (COUNTY).—(t) Edward Lucas, Esq., of Cas tleshane ; and Hon. Henry Robert Westenra, eldest son of Lord Rossmore.—The Lucas family, one of great antiquity, has frequently represented the county—heretofore on liberal principles. The present Mr. Lucas was the first gentleman on the grand jury who declared in favour of Catholic Emanci pation. He has now, however, beeh elected by the Orange interest. NEWRY.—D. C. Brady, Esq. • PORTARLINGTON.—(t) Hon. G. L. Dawson Darner, Esq., a Lieutenant-Colonel in the urmy, brother to the present Earl of Portarlington. QUEEN'S ( COUNTY. )—(t) Sir Charles Coote, Bart., of Ballyfin, and (t) the Hon. Thomas Vesey, eldest sou of Lord de Vesci. ROSSCOMMON ( COUNTY).—The O'Connor Don; and Fitz stephen French, Esq., brother of Arthur French, Esq., of French Park, the descendant of a most ancient family.—Were Ireland still ruled by her native princes, and had the dynasty of his family endured to the present time, The O'Connor Don would now be King of •Connaught. He is nephew to the learned antiquary, the late Dr. O'Connor, who was, for so mang years, librarian to the Marquis of Buckingham, at Stow. The defeated candidate is son of Mr. Barton (formerly a part ner in the house of Sneyd and Co., in. Dublin) , who is said to possess property in Ireland, Spain, and Portugal, to the amount of half a million. Ross (NEw. )—John Hyacinth Talbot, Esq., of Talbot-hall. SLIGO ( COUNTY).—(O Edward Joshua Cooper, Esq., of Makree Castle ; and (t) Alexander Peiceval, Esq., Lieut.- Colonel of the Sligo Militia, of Temple House.—Both country gentlemen of ancient descent. Colonel Perceval has been appointed by the present Administration Treasurer of the Ordnance. SLIGO.—John Martin, Esq. TIPPERARY (COUNTY). —Richard Lalor Sheil, Esq., of Long Orchard ; and Thomas Otway Cave, Esq., of Castle Otway.--Mr. Otway Cave, qualified alike by his great landed possessions and the liberality of his opinions, to represent the second county in Ireland, married about two years ago a daughter of Sir Francis Burdett, Bart. He is nephew to the gallant Admiral Sir Robert Otway, Bart., and assumed the surname of Cave upon succeeding to the estates in Lincoln shire of that ancient (Baronet's) family. TRALEE.—Maurice O'Connell, Esq., eldest son of the Member for Dublin. TYRONE (COUNTY).—(t) Hon. Henry Thomas Lowry Corry, second son of the Earl of Belmore, and son-in-law to the Earl of Shaftesbury ; and (t) Lord C. Hamilton. WATERFORD ( COUNTY).—Sir Richard Musgrave, Bart., nephew to Sir Richard Musgrave who wrote the History of Ireland ; and P. Power, Esq. WATERFORD ( ClTY).—Thomas Wyse, Esq., of St. John's, and Henry Winston Barron, Esq., of Belmont —Mr. Wyse has attained literary reputation, speaks eloquently, and is esteemed a person of sound judgment and honourable prin ciples. He married some years since one of the daughters of Lucien Buonaparte, the sister of Lady Dudley Stuart. His family is a very ancient one in the county of Woterford. WESTMEATII ( COUNTY).—Sir Richard Nagle, Bart. ; and Montague Lowther Chapman, Esq., eldest son of Sir Thomas Chapman, Bart., formerly colonel of the carbineers.—Mr. Chapman has supported the broadest principles of freedom since he entered the House of Commons. Sir Richard Nagle was dismissed from the magistracy for presiding in his ca pacity, we believe of high sheriff, at au anti-tithe meeting ; in recompense he has ever since been sent to Parliament by Westmeath, a county in which " in the good old times of Pro testant ascendancy" a Catholic (which religion the Hon. Mem ber professes) could hardly appear with safety. as a freeholder at an election. The first attempt to open the county was made unsuccessfully in 1810, by Robert Sterne Tighe, Esq., of Mitchelstown. WEXFORD ( County).— Maher, Esq. ; and James Power, Esq. WEXFORD.—Charles Arthur Walker, Esq., of Belmont. WICKLOW ( COUNTY).—James Grattan, Esq., of Tinnehinch, eldest son of the late Right Hon. Henry Grattan (see Meath); and Ralph Howard, Esq., of Bushy-park, cousin to the Earl of Wicklow. YOUGUALL.—John O'Connell, Esq., third son of the mem ber for Dublin. SCOTLAND. ABERDEENSHIRE.-(t) Honourable William Gordon, of Minnis, a captain in the Royal Navy, next brother to the Earl of Aberdeen. ABERDEEN.—A Bannerman, Esq. - - - - ARGYLSHIRE.—WaIter Frederick - Campbell Esq., of Shaw field and Islay, a gentleman of large fortune and powerful in fluence. He is nephew (maternally) to the present Duke of Argyle, and brother-in-law to the Earl of Uxbridge and Lord Tullamore. His mother, formerly the beautiful Lady Char lotte Campbell, has of late become highly distinguished as a novelist. AVISIIIRE.—Richard Alexander Oswald, Esq., of Auchen. cruive, brother-in-law to the Earl of Eglinton, and a consi derable landed proprietor. AYR.—Lord J. S tewart. BANFFSHIRE.—(t) George Ferguson, Esq., of Pitfour, captain in the Royal Navy. BERWICKSHIRE.-(t) Sir William Purves Hume Campbell, Bart., of Purves-hall, who assumed the surnames of Hume Campbell upon inheriting the gret estates of his maternal an cestors, the Earls of Marchmont. BUTESHIRE.—(t) Sir William Rae, Bart., of Eksgrove, Lord-Advocate of Scotland. —The Honourable Gentleman is son of the late Sir David Rae, Lord Chief Justice Clerk, and great grand-nephew of the celebrated Dun Can Forbes, Lord President of the Court of Session. CAITHNESS- SHlRE.—George Sinclair, Esq., eldest son of the Right Hon. , Sir John Sinclair, Bart., of Ulbster, who has dis tinuished himself as a p o liti ca l econo mist. ' CLACKMANNANSHIRg,—AdrniraI Adam, of Barnes.—The defeated Tory candidate was Captain Bruce, of Kennet, Chief~ of the Bruces of Clackmannan, a scion of the Bruces of An nandale. the illustrious progenitors of Robert Bruce, King of Scotland. Alas ! how changed in political feeling from his immortal ancestoy. CUPAR, &c.—Andrew Johnstone, Esq., of Renny-hill, Fife- shire. DUMBARTONSIIIRE.-A. Dennistoun, Esq. D UMFRIES- mum —John James .Hope Johnstone, Esq., eldest son of Admiral Sir William Johnstone Hope. G. C. 8., and cousin to the Earl of Hopetoun. Mr. H&'pe Johnstone claims, through his mother. the ancient Earldom of Annandale. DUMFRIES, &c.—General Sharpe, of Hoadam-castle. DUNDEE.—Sir Henry Parnell. Bart., of liathleague.—This distinguished Statesman, who filled, for a short period, the office of Secretary-at-War, under the Whig' Administration , formerly represented the Queen's county ; an honour his father, Sir John Parnell, Chancellor of the Exchequer,. had pri3viously enjoyed from 1783 to his decease. The Parnoll family were settled in Ireland by the father of the celebrated poem, Arch deacon Parnell, and have, since their establishment' there, ever held a distinguished rank amongst its landed propri eta rs. De feated by Tory influence in the Queen's county, Sir He nry was cordially welcomed and triumphantly returned by the' unbend ing Reformers of " bonnie Dundee." DYSART, &c.—John Fergus, Esq., of Strathore. EmNetraoasairtE.—(t) Sir George Clerk, P iart., of Pennycuick. EDINPAIRGH.—Sir John Campbell, late Attorney- , General, son-in-law to Lord Abinger ' • and the Right Honou ?able Sir J. Abercromby, brother of Lord Abercromby. Sir John Campbell is acknowledged by all parties to be elle of th a ablest practtsing lawyers now at the bar. His endeavours t, affect reforms in the law have done him infinite ham ur,— -reforms which aim at abolishing a system of oppression that !nas long tainted the purity of England justice. It is to be hot led that those efforts will experience the sincere support of 'whatever government may be in the ascendant, and that the al buses the Honourable Gentleman has so elequently denounced, may, in the next session, be blotted for ever from our legal cod e.—Mr. Abercromby, who held the office of master of the r.aint under the late Government, and was formerly Chief Baron of the Exchequer in Scotland, is the third son of the 'hero. of Alex andria—the gallant Sir Ralph Abercromby. ELGINSHIRE AND NAIRSHIRI:I.—(t) The Honourable Colonel Francis William Geant, Lord Lieutenant of Inver mess-shire, next brother to the Earl of Scofield, and son of the late Sir Grant, Bart. of Grant. ELGIN, &C.—Andrew Leith Hay, E sot. , Lie atenant- CO - in the army, elder son of General Leith Hay, of Rannes and Leith-hall, the representative of the ancient families of Leith, of Leith-hall and Hay of Rannes.. Colonel Hay office under the Whig Administration. FIFESHIRE. —Captain Wemyss„ of Wen vss, son of Lieut.- General Wemyss, great uncle to the preset tt Earl of Wernyta , and son-in-law of the late Earl of Errol. FORFARSHIRE.—HonourabIe Douglas Gordon Hallybunton, half-brother to the Earl of Aboyne.—He astsumed his present surname upon succeeding to the extensive possessions of his maternal ancestors, the Hallyburtons of Pitcaur. FORTROSE, INVERNESS, &c.—(t) Charles L ennox Cumming Bruce, Esq. of Kinnaird.—Of this family, a cadet of Airtb, was tine celebrated James Bruce, the Abyssinian traveller. GLA°GOW.—James Oswald Oswald, Esq., of Shield-hall , nearly related to Mr. Oswald, the Member for Ayrshire ; and C. Dunlop, Esq. GREENOCK.— Robert Wallace, Esq. of Kelly.—The direct descendant of the Wallaces of Ellerslie, tb e progenitors of ' the renowned Sir William Wallace. HADDINGTONSIIIRE.—Robert Ferguson, ll:sq., of Raith. HADDINGTON, &c.--R. Steuart, Esq. INVERNESS-SHlRE.—Right Hon. Charles Grant. INVERBERVIE, &c.—Patrick Chalmers, Es q., of Auldbar. INVERKEITHING.—Lord Dalmeky, eldest son of the Earl of Rosebery. KINCARDINESHIRE.—(t) The Honourable High Arbuthnot, a Major-General in the army, C. 8., brotitter to Lord Ar buthnot. KiRKCUDBRIGHT.—The Right Honourable Robert Cutler Fergusson, of Orroland and Craigdarroch. KIRKWALL, &c.—James Loch, Esq., of Drylaw. LANARKSHIRE.—John Maxwell, Esq. LEITH.—John Archibald Murray, Esq. LINLITHGOWSIIIRE.—(t) Honourable J. Hope. LINLITHGOW, Downe, Gillon, Es( t., of Wall- house. ORKNEY AND ZETLAND. — George Traill, Esq., Df Hebister• (The election for Orkney and Zetland has not yet been de termined, but Mr. Traill is secure of his return.) PAlSLEY.—Captain Speirs. PEEBLESHIRE. — (t) Sir John Hay, Bart., of Smiihfield and Hayston.—The Hays have been, from time immemwarial, con' siderable proprietors in the county of Tweedale, an have re' sided at Smithfield Castle for more than 300 years. PERTHSHIRE.—Hon. Fox Malik, eldest son of L ,ord Par r Inure, and first cousin to Lord Ramsay, the defeated Cory cap' didate for Edinburgh. He is also nephew, by maz riage, t ° Mr. Abercromhy, the member for that city. PERTH.—Laurence Oliphant, Esq., of Condie and Noe" ton ; a gentleman of ancient family, large fortune, And r.lhe" ral principles. RENritswsniftE.—Sir' Michael Shaw Stewart, crf Blac k s hall, whose ancestors have at various times repress cited t"" county, even so far back as the reign of Charles I. RENFREW, &c. — The able and well-known Dr. I 3ovvringt the friend of Jeremy Bentham. ROSS - SHIRE AND CROMARTYSHIRE. James Al 4.; an de r Stewart Mt.ekenzie, of the latc. I.ra forth, and grand nephew of the seventh Earl of Gallo. wry. ,„ ROXEURGHSHIE.—(t) Lord John Douglas Scott, brutThe r tile Duke of Buccleugh. SELKIRKSHIRE.—(t) Alexander Pringle, Esq., of WIl: bank ; descended from a common ancestor with his opp on" the Laird of Clifton.—The Pringle family is frequently melli tioned in the poems of Sir Walter Scott. It possesses g rey estates in the county. STIRLINGSHIRE.—(d) W. Forbes,_ Esq. SUTHERLANDSHIRE.—Roderick Macleod, Esq.,_ Lord-o c m * tenant of the County of Cromtirty, son of Robert 330` - .7Eneas Macleod, Esq., of Cadboll ; a descendant of the; Lode of the Isles. WIGTONSIIIRE.—Sir Andrew Agnew, Bart., of Locl3narb WIGTON.—John M'Taggart, Esq. *.* In compiling the foregoing list of the Members o f the new Parliament, we have been greatly indebted to M r. Burke's " History of the Commoners of Great Britain wad Ir e : land ;" a work which abounds in much curious historic al Ow ter, and which possesses at the present moment a more the e a ordinary degree of interest, as it shows the connectic , n9 af a influence of the landed proprietors of the empire. grade in her social system," to quote Mr. Burke's owe. v'or u ; " her independent country gentlemen—England maialy ow. her greatness abroad, and her prosperity at home. i n this and her free institutions, she differs from every other aun t ° in Europe." MEETINGS OF CREDITORS AT THE COUR I ' BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-MORROW. , —..-.............-.--- A (From the London Gazette.) M. I I R. Word, veterinary-surgeon, Twickenham-common... ..... ! at ji R. Morri,on, Ca' penter, Wilson-street. Finsbury-square N 0 T. Driver, merchant, Peckham 9 il It. Fraser, wihe.merchant, nromptori . ••• 2 0 W. Inglis, currier, Hcundsclitch ~.. 1 0 S. 'ltch, victualler, Cambritigo-heath, Hackney ....„ 1 I G Gidley, button-manufacturer, Wood-street, Chezipside N .1. Lyons, u.aster-mariner. South Lambeth 1 it J. Boo.hby, vict aller, Tothilfields ..1 1 J. 11. Fishcrf scrivener, Tratalgar.square, Charing-cte , ss A solicitor of extensive practice, who is also a and gistrate, in a town in East Kent, has recently been. inforn l ie against for a fraud on the revenue, in using a stamp 258. no t, the legal amount of what ought to have been used, arid ponkt, ing the difference. The penalty is 500/., and eratsure•f r 7, the Rolls. The party was induced to lay the informatio n m save himself, as he was also liable to a penalty, as well asw#, vender of the premises from whom he had made the purchr i ; PLl although both were ignorant of the fraud that had taken it till money was required to be raised on the property, Wh 6 was discovered by another party. —Kentish Chronicl_!:_....,„e, BIRTHS. On the Ist inst., in York-terrace, Regent's - park , M rs. ThoID Saunders, of a daughter. el 61 On the 30th ult., in Cornwall-terrace, Regent's - park , the of Win. Poynter, Esq.,_ of a daughter. o f On the 30th ult., the lady of Cyril J. Monkhouse, Esq. , Cr o- ' a h ven-street, Strand, of a dahter. 0' e 29th ult., Mrs. John ug K. Gilliat, of Clapham-coinl° Ain the A ult., J. Juan of a daughter. noV On the 29th ult., the lady of Dr. Holland, of Lower Br street, of a daughter. o f On the 29th ult., in Cambridge-street, Hyde-park, the wife Arthur Easton, Esq., of a son. A t 1 On the 12th ult., at Canapitet, near Lausanne, Switzerla n., lady of William Woodley Cerjitt, Esq., of a daughter. ir On the 17th ult., in Torrington-square, the lady of Wm. 1 ") Esq., of a (laughter. MARRIED. St' On the Ist inst., L. Henry Michele, Esq., of Regent--street,„.;, , . James's', to Fanny, eldest daughter of the Rev. F. .J. Vl' of St. Paul's, Covent-garden. o , Or: the 27th ult., at Lewisham, Edward Parkinson, Estrilf llrighton, to Selina, eldest daughter of Richard Preston Priv Esq., of Sydenilam, Kent. e TliO' On the '29th ult., the Rev. Thomas Chalmers Storie , of - A ijail Ditton, to Amelia Elizabeth Charlotte, eldest daughter of P Mackenzie, Esq., of Woolwich. On the 22d ult., the Rev. Thomas Mack, A.M., of T u nstester the county of Norfolk, to Catherine Bailey, the youngest riat i g of the late Mrs. White, of Braconciiile, near Norwich. DIED. On the 31st ult., Sarah, wife of Mr. Retry Lamb, of square, in her 32d year. On the 26th ult., at Deal, James Methurst Poynter, Esq'' tain of Sandown Castle, in his 78th year. f ° On the 27th ult., in .ber 32d year, Jane Elizabeth, th e Mr. William Field, of Osnaburg-place, New-road. On the 26th ult.:, aged 33, Robert,. youngest son of the late Liam Codrington, Esq., of Wroughton, Wiltshire. ' On the 29th ult., in Bedford-square, Richard Foster, $54. his 88th year. On the 29th ult., at Holloway, Miss Elizabeth Yenning' of the late Wm. Yenning, Esq., aged 68. t / OP On the 29th ult., in George-street, Adelphi , in h er 71s Sarah, wife of Mr. John Knox, late of Devonport. On the 24th ult., Edward Mead, Esq., of Boxmoor 1 1° ` Hemel Hempstead, aged 77. th On the 29th ult., at Shalden, Elizabeth, the wife of e Charles Henry White. On the 15th of December last, at the Eboulemens, Lloe ' t tAg e nada, Pierre de Sales Latterire, M.D. late of Quebec Balham. „lic t On the 27th ult.. at Kennington, Mrs. Mary Farmer , the late Mr. William James Farmer, of Limehouse, aged 5 London : Printed and Published by MURDO YO, at The Sun (Mee, No, p; Strand, u NITEE do hereby One o'cloc be Willing such qua; mabe at the folk March, 18 Chatham Cork and River Tha Erith, 1 River Th a below E inclusiv( bet). and 1 Falmouth All part Lively t he at thi s o ff tuallino EI the s i 7 per Sheerness bowlin e ' • '1 the P ostm Cus very I Tender w nor any ix authonzed Every T "ruPanied at Som erse to become for the due Port avout the other 14 AT Po Posite Cliff ____ cHE A Sui Ditto, striped. • Ditto or Poter s A A Pla And evn trousers.Yelvet, telre~~l d: o r s a t b S t: er a 1 1 :1:e e ll J Ti --Pamilies De upplied' s'roprietor London, an The follo kelt Gi n . Doub edd j6 3 ao ::7 tte: eff.:l,s,; Old ani P a g .n ' L e al e la --(di s h Bra' , 2 4_, : it d ,t(i( P ), o f r o t u f rr V re cc . l I ,'"tto Cru s t -c ohm karYsalusPeri , ex *** J . T. h a li btractio n portable for M ar k ww folk - street, Wholesale ] 0 HE t o : le-,:zilhexTemhtveiesdoinneti)l::yl; ,„,al.-:.ditil::ei's L ti joo i r te eitekty i fi f v e ; t e as s hr T t d : on r o uu j e b l i s 1 ,3 ' siiieitiwwe i 'gate, nernere h gsaort e aetsftitpu a esclo b bnas s eivsiii i ,, ' (?t tj: rit : a l r , ~ : 11 0 eat tiitie ' nhtt h t oen h p o cii e snua s hle A s it, 4a l i . lA, - o:a.tinio.an at i • :0 • ,, ices s" To this L we es l ily ofl e . g • conn td l The first .... .... % 10 month Mee} . 2 I '..". 1 ... ii ......... ... ... 1 11 1, 41 , : e e ri e l l: e i e li e 'a tt : ii 1 1: n ; ..... 1 1 .9e a 9 , Re. : . o a O a' , i le Th 3 inferrer; ts. ur! le t Thi, sun d p00 . ... e "' will then 13 ;tire. foi" exte nihng i The f,,rl ,en 0 tb w ho ,4,0, , are r( purcui re cell P ia- it 'h E :11 e uy ' u f i le z d e * a ' t t h ir * ri e Q s e sT e w ri. luSEAahhPr wan •, w he/1 , In order ....__ es ~,ql3. irt,oo:o,if ~ Thofo ll ¶1 A Publi cif the l a ' co n • of eie cted. ~ Esq . 9 fl' l ‘r:° , l‘B: s ti r . t t elltY r sht t e i t.u h Se b dilwi e th ti ubil- ta lotPelr o i: d rbt:' -colon' °e APPlieat eoru a • !r_an , 1 d tl''' lIAL ,ii. ivy nie, _.-----/ z, I tcToß st• ti thi s Ai street,,,, th_ e . Vicl''' ' t hese pinch oe se IN_ d does ''' rs3 •l Est 'Ol, , not it PrieP kfr, ord e d it rrhs oe4 ticin al Cou o f ~- 0 cured in tl • of / 11 To b e h d, i" wiir ~,,to,„, h _ 'am-st ,t lough A dnn aY, t ---'" Ild eoUnt --........_____2 Sali 6bVrY' I A Li‘/. i b , OSI ear i', I CAN the il lfe . I whe n ' and i liii' lAs soon late i liev i °fi a' e 0 , i t , rloc e( .... t , he r, r' s q . ' od so vut, a *cc Ivith i t P ic . l iog, lj :,hntild 7 b p el f ' '" S'vr - , 7101 child ; ‘ ,P , d ia .. , alc( flour t ' T h ' e 'Y gic lor e great 1 1° ` ' I Y , e a l n i t ", ha s . ,f th e i , co f 2 4 CS' ‘ Qii nson , e d ast. 1.0. -- kf g - ' . - f or j !e C ° ' ' II LI t , . o not 0 1 4tre, r re lic t ti " 3 St • , " r ib ... :1;, 4 Saud . iir ith ?. ' . , - gov • • Lt I II 4