The Sun. — London, England, 1835-02-10 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The 'eagerness of the Whig Radicals to turn out Sir R. Peel and his colleagues on the first day of the approaching session, by a vote of the house, since they have failed of bullying it out before the session by all the varieties of abuse and intimidation—nay, some of OM wise ones among them, by a threat to impeach the Duke of Wellington ! must satisfy every one of the :least shrewdness, that there is some pressing motive for such haste in pushing on their object. Why should the mere choice of a Speaker be puffed into a matter of such pre-eminent magnitude ? What national inte rest is involved in, or connected with, it ? Why should such prodigious emphasis be laid in the Opposition journals on a matter so personal as this ? Why should Members of Parliament, who vote against Mr. Abercromby—nay, or who stay away, and do not vote at all—be told that they are to lose caste as Radicals, that they are un-Whigged for ever and ever, and can neither henceforth nor for the time past, let them have divided an hun dred times for the Reform Bill, for every clause of it, and for every measure proposed as a consequence of it, pretend that they are, or have ever been, Re formers ? We ask them what means this monstrous extravagance ? What means all this fire and fury about nothing, or worse than nothing—viz., the stick a -- incr Mr. Abercromby, an untried Speaker , in t o the chair of the House of Commons, in preference to a gentleman on whose behalf all the men of highest cha racter and influence among the Whig party came for ward only two years ago, and declared that there was no person in the then House of Commons, of which Mr. Abercromby himself was at the moment a Mem ber, who could compare with Sir C. M. Sutton for his manifold claims upon the chair ? On one part of this subject we have already stated what was the rationale of the Whig-Radical policy. From the hour at which a general conviction began to prevail among the people that Sir R. Peel's manifesto and the state of parties held out a better prospect of sound and well-digested measures of Reform than could have been realized by the weakness and distractions of the Mel bourne Ministry, had it remained in office, the partisans of the latter became persuaded that a majority of the House of Commons would never op pose the address in answer to a King's spech framed upon the principles of the Prime Minister's nzanifesto. The grand hope, therefore, of carrying an amendment, praying his Majesty to dismiss his Ministers, from that moment failed. Were the division of that night to be the first of the session, instead of a display of over whelming force, the result would be to the Whigs and bobtails an exposure of lamentable discord and imbeci lity, and nothing but discouragement, languor, and de feat, could betide them for the rest of the season. What then was to be the next expedient ? A display of numbers must be made—it was indispensable. But the question was as to a second cheval de battaille, the first having unfortunately broken down. Failing an amend men to the Address, then comes an amendment to Sir Charles Manners Sutton ; and a respectable gentle man, an ex• Whig Minister and ex-Scotch Judge, but who never in his life sat even as chairman of com mittee, has been pitched upon as the opposition flash man. The measure is a manceuvre—it would be vulgar to call it a trick ; but there is this advantage attending it—in canvassing reluctant Members of Parliament, if the objection of the party applied to, be that it is a strictly personal affair—that the question is one of mere individual fitness, and therefore that Sir C. M. Sutton being the better qualified of the two candidates, he ought to be elected by the House—the canvassee is assaulted in a strain of high-flown Whiggery, with assurances that it is no personal question at all ; that there is a " great principle to be vindicated ;" and that the vital interests of reform all hang upon the skirts of Mr. Speaker Abercromby's robe. This is the gibbe rish employed with one set of members ; with another, the note is changed. If they seem averse to choosing , a Speaker on party views, under the mask of " vindi cating a great principle," they are assured that the mere choice of a Speaker will not be considered by the heads of the Opposition as trepanning them into any given course of politics for the future ; that Sir Charles Manners Sutton, in his own person, has behaved quite shamefully since the Melbourne Cabinet was dismissed ; and that the infliction of a lesson upon him can pledge nobody to vote for a Radical amend ment, or to refuse the Ministers " a fair trial." Young enough must be the birds which are caught by chaff like this. But still, if only half a dozen are bagged by it, the game is still worth catching. A splash must be made, that's flat. The humbug must be spread abroad that the Ministers are in a dead minority—a panic is hoped for, and (by the mark) a resignation. Or else, what happens ? Why, the game of the confederates is up. The Ministers will have an opportunity of deve loping their policy—the country will see with its own eyes, and not through the distorting medium of fac tious prints, or declamatory speeches, that Sir Robert Peel means reform, and nothing less. The question will then be tried upon its merits, the principles of the Conservative Government will be judged from the practice adopted by it under the working of the Reform Bill, and both will be compared with those of the un steady, unskilful, awkward, self-distrustful, " mob led," Radical courting, procrastinating, shufflin g , in efficient, and ostentatious personages, whom the Co nservatives could not help succeeding. All this is fore seen. The whole aim and spirit of the Whig-Ra dical tactitians is explained by it. They are not for giving the Government fair play, because by foul play alone can they now hope to destroy it.—Times. The Times fairly abandons Sir Charles Manners Sutton. The article in that Journal of yesterday, on the contest for the Speakership, was evidently written under a firm belief that there will be a majority in favour of Mr. Abercromby. No one at all acquainted with the ways of our Contemporary can mistake the meaning of the appeal to the Whigs. "If (says the Times) the Whigs attain their immediate purpose, their ruin-is inevitable. Their sole chance of salvation as a party not to be swallowed up by one or other of the Conservatives or Destructives, would be to hold for a season the balance between both. But, unhappily, passion bewilders them. It is our firm persuasion that a majority in favour of Mr. Abercromby would ensure a large majority against the opposition on the Address." The Whigs will, no doubt, appreciate at its proper value the interest manifested for their salvation as a party by our Contemporary, and take the majority in favour of Mr. Abercromby at the risk of hawing a large majority against the opposition on the Address. The maxim, Fas est ab hoste doceri, must not be interpreted that the advice of an adversary is to be literally followed. The Times is pregnant with instruction to the Whigs ; but they may take it for granted that if our contempo rary thought its advice could promote their salvation as a party, it would be withheld. Our contemporary would not have tried to persuade the Whigs, if it could have safely bullied them. We believe the Whigs will take the majority in favour of Mr. Abercromby, subject to all the consequences of the victory of the Reformers. Though it may not he for our interest to praise the accuracy of our contemporary's intelligence, we must in this case so far do justice to it as to add our confirmation. We believe that Mr. Abercromby's election is safe. The Tories generally believe this ; for at the Clubs yesterday they were quite chop-fallen. They have been boasting of deserters from the Whigs, with the intention, no doubt, of causing desertion. But we know, from certain intelligence received from all quarters, that there is no desertion. They have been offering to bet five to four on Sir Charles Sutton : yesterday, however, they would not bet on these terms. In fact they know that Sir Charles Sutton has no chance whatever of being Speaker of the new Par liament. We were sure that the moment the question came to be seriously discussed, Sir Charles Sutton's claim to the Speakership would be seen in its true light. The Tories ought to sup port him, because he has exerted himself to promote the success of their cause. But for the very same reason, he is the very last man whom the Reformers ought to support. In fact, no man can be a sincere Re former, and vote in favour of a candidate for the Speakership who has shown himself a strong Tory partisan, and who will, if he have an opportunity, seek once more to favour the Tories. But, were there no other reason, the question has been chosen for a trial of strength between the Tories and Reformers ; and he who, under such circumstances, deserts the Re- THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY, FEBRUAIY 10, 1835. the game is played for a Parliamentary honour ; let but agitation win, and to-morrow the stake may be life.. —Morning Post. At the present moment, when we have really more than mere surmise to suppose that Russia purposes to aggrandize herself by converting Turkey into a sort of military fief, at the expense of this country, anything which exhibits the true feeling of the Turkish popula tion upon the important subject of the future- amicable relations of that country with England must be highly interesting, and we have much reason to believe that if our ancient ally of the Ottoman Porte were once freed from the thraldom and baneful influence, as well as the hollow mock protection of the Russian Autocrat, the Turkish dominions will be able to present internal resources for the consumption of British manufactures especially, which it ought to be the policy of this country to foster to the utmost. At the present time our limits will not permit us to dwell at length upon the necessity, both commercially and politically, upon the importance of maintaining a friendly alliance with the Porte ; but it is a subject to which our readers well know we have turned great attention, and we believe that his Grace the Secretary for Foreign Affairs is fully alive to the importance of the question also ; so much so, that if our manufacturing interests were to make any demonstration of their opinion of the value of the trade with Turkey, and her dependencies, our Government would support them. It is, therefore, from this feeling that we understand Namik Pacha, who has been recalled by the intrigues of Russia, sets out on Wednesday on a short tour through our manu facturing districts, of which Manchester will be the chief scene. The result of this journey will, we trust, be sufficient to strengthen the Duke in his future policy towards Turkey, and we hope, for the sake of our national credit, that his Grace will redeem the errors of his sleepy predecessor in office, and prove himself a match for the wily Pozzo di Borgo.—Morn /no' Herald. We are almost ashamed to touch again upon the question of the Speakership ; but it is not our fault that we do so—it is the fault of the Tories—it is the fault of the times. To Sir C. M. Sutton, in his personal capa city, either as a private gentleman, or as the mere Speaker of the House of Commons, there is no objection. In both capacities he has, all but in one instance, proved himself to be unexceptionable. He is civil in his ge neral deportment—courteous in his manner—attentive to his duties, though not specially skilled in the very small science required for the office of Speaker ; but making all these allowances for him, he is the last man to whom any Reformer should give a vote as Speaker of a Reformed House of Commons, under the circumstances in which the election is to take place. He is a Tory—he is an ultra-Tory—he exhibited extreme partiality towards his party at the most critical period of the Reform Bill—he has since shewn himself to be a partisan, in stead of a neutral—he has been put forward, not as a Speaker, but as the first rock of offence on which the Tories and Liberals can debate the question of their existence, or non existence-- whether the country shall have or shall not have, Reform—and we ask, whether under such circumstances, any Reformer can pos sibly doubt on which side to give his vote ? It is no personal question, and Sir Charles Manners Sut ton may go to sleep—that is, be rejected—with the entire satisfaction that he has simply been the martyr of his party, and lost but little in the shape of per sonal estimation—it is a national question, and as such, we trust, it will be treated by all who wish well to their country—all who are desirous that the Reform Bill shall not be a dead letter—all who wish to amend, to improve, and to ameliorate the institutions of their country, but not to destroy them. We shall not again allude to the very apparent intrigues of Sir C. M. Sutton, to bring in a Tory Administration. We shall say nothing of— Nov. 18. The Speaker had an audience of the King. 19. The Speaker visited the Duke of Wellington. Dec. 7. The Speaker had an audience of the King. 9. Ditto ditto. 11. The Speaker visited the Duke of Wellington two days after the return of Sir R. Peel. The Speaker, on the same day, visited Sir Robert Peel. 18. The Speaker was closeted with Mr. Goulburn at the Home Office. 19. Ditto ditto. 31. Ditto ditto. because these things are notorious, and because Sir C. M. Sutton having in those matters exhibited his partialities, which, as a private individual, he had a right to do—he is merely in such capacity to be looked upon as a private individual, and, as a Candidate for the Chair, to be treated as such. The matter is, in consequence, reduced to the plain point—will the ma jority of the Reformed House of Commons have a Tory or a Whig Speaker—the said majority of the said House being Liberals ? We pause for the 19th. —Morning Advertiser. formers, and swells the Tory ranks, is assuredly not a Reformer ; though, if he be not a Tory, it may be dif ficult to decide whether he be a knave or a fool. The question of the necessity for choosing a Speaker whose opinions are in accordance with those of the majority, has been discussed by Swift with his usual vigour of understanding. In his Letter to a Member of Par liament in Ireland, on choosing a new Speaker there, , in 1708, vol. 5, Scott's edition, p. 264, he says— " Cana body, whose mouth and heart must go so contrari wise, ever act with sincerity or hardly with consistency ? Such a man is no proper vehicle to retain or convey the sense of the House, which in so many yoints of the greatest moment will be directly contrary to his. * * * • Perhaps you will tell me, as some have already had the weak ness, that it is of little importance to either party to have a Speaker of their side, his business being only to take the sense of the House, and report it ; that you often, at com mittees, put an able Speaker into the chair on purpose to pre vent him from stopping a bill. Why, if it were no more than this, I believe I should hardly choose, even among my foot men, such a one to deliver a message, whose interest and opi nion led him to wish it might miscarry, But I remember to have heard Col. Birch, of Herefordshire, say, ' That he was a very sorry Speaker whose single vote was not better than 50 com mon ones.' I am sure it is reckoned in England the first great test of the prevalency of either party in the House. Sir T. Littleton thought that a House of Commons, with a stinking breath (supposing the Speaker to be the mouth), would go near to infect every thing within the walls, and a great deal without. It is the smallest part of an able Speaker's business Is hat he performs in the House ; at least, if he be in with the Court, when it is hard to say how many converts may be made in a circle of dinners or private cabals. And you and I easily call to mind a gentleman in that station in Eng land, who, by his own acts and personal credit, was able to draw over a majority, and change the whole power of a pre vailing side in a nice juncture of affairs, and make a Parlia ment expire in one party who had lived in another. " I am far from an inclination to multiply party causes ; but surely the best of us can with very ill grace make that an objection who has not been so nice in matters of much less im portance. Yet I have heard some persons of both sides gravely deliver themselves in this manner—' Why should we make the choosing of a Speaker a party cause ? Let us fix upon one who is well versed in the practices and methods of Parliament.' But suppose the principles of the most artful Speaker would have no influence, either to obtain or obstruct any point in Parliament ; who can answer what effects such a choice may produce without doors ? • • " I confess, if it were a thing possible to be compassed, it would seem most reasonable to fill the chair with some person who would be entirely devoted to neither party ; but since there are so few of that character, and those either unqualified or unfriended, I cannot see how a majority will answer it to their reputation, to be so ill provided of able persons, that they must have recourse to their adversaries for a leader—a pro ceeding of which I never met with above one example, and even that succeeded but ill, though it was recommended by an oracle, which advised some city in Greece to beg a general from their enemies, w ho, in scorn, sent them either a fiddler or a poet, I have forgotten which ; and so much I remember, that his conduct was such, that they soon grew weary of him." So much for Swift and the common-sense view of the question. It will be observed that we do not ad di ess our arguments to Tories. If they can be con vinced by our arguments to become Reformers in good earnest, and abandon the Peel Administration, well and good. But so long as they remain Tories, we do not suppose they will be guided by our counsel. In this respect we are more modest than the Times. We hope only to influence Reformers. Our benevo lence does not extend to the Tories. We honestly avow that we are so destructively inclined, that if we could destroy them as a party, we would. The Tories we know will not trust us. But the Times must either conceive itself very cunning, or the Whigs very gullible, when it tries to persuade them that it has their good at heart, while it is all the while fighting for the Duke.—Morning Chronicle. The entertaining correspondence between Lord John Russell and Mr. Abercromby has been some time be fore the public, and yet neither the Opposition nor their advocates appear to have agreed upon any pre cise definition of that " public principle," the very name of which operated with the magical effect of an " open sesame" upon the obduracy of Mr. Abercromby, and at once determined him to become a candidate for the Speakership, on the nomination of the Noble Lord. Perhaps it may be superfluous to enter for a moment upon any reasoning which assumes that there is any public principle in the case ; and it is the less desirable to do so, as, in order to make any application of such a principle, we must, for arguments sake, admit the existence of certain facts which have been made matter of accusation against the late Speaker, and which have been given out appa rently upon mere surmise, have been credited without even the show of proof, and, indeed, as we have already repeatedly asserted, have no real existence. But supposing it were true that Sir Charles Manners Sutton did, in the exercise of his functions as a Privy Councillor, concur in recommend ing to the King those measures which ensued upon the dismissal of the late Ministry—supposing even it were true that he had been an adviser of that pro _ _ ceeding—what " public principle" forbids his re-elec tion as Speaker of the House of Commons ? No one pretends that he has been guilty of any misconduct, unless it be in his office of Speaker. The King has a right to require the deliberate and conscientious ad vice of his sworn Councillors upon any question of Go vernment. It was the Speaker's duty as a Councillor and a subject to render that advice. If anv conflicting duty has been violated, it must be one which the Heuse of Commons, as a distinct body of the Legislature, is entitled to exact from its officer. The accusation, therefore, must be that Sir Charles Manners Sutton, in his discharge of duty as a Privy Councillor, has infringed or betrayed the peculiar rights and privileges of the Commons' House of Parliament. The public principle, then, upon which the late Speaker is to be condemned must take this form : that it is a right and privilege of the Commons' House of Parliament, even during its recess, to controul and direct the King in his appointment of Ministers ; and that the Speaker, during a recess, is bound, at least if the opportunity be afforded him, to protest against any step taken with reference to a change of Ministry which, in his judgment, would have been disagreeable to the majority of the House at the time of its last sit ting. The condemnation of the Speaker must imply heavy censure upon the King, and the " principle," if carried to its full extent, arrives at this point, that the King infringes the rights of the House of Commons if he dismisses his Ministry during a prorogation, or at any time while they have, or might have been expected to have, a majority of votes in that House ; and that those who advise him to do so are enemies or unfaithful servants of the Representatives of the people. It is scarcely ne cessary to observe that the " principle" also applies iu full force to any dissolution of the House at a time when it may be presumed that a majority would not have consented to it. Assuming, therefore, that the facts charged against Sir Charles Manners Sutton are true, those Members who think that the House of Commons, even while prorogued, ought not only to exercise an absolute authority over the whole political conduct of its Speaker, but also to have the privilege of a direct veto on Ministerial appointments, and, moreover, that the House ought never to be dissolved without its own sanction, will find no difficulty in voting for Mr. Abercromby upon " principle. The " prin ciple" (if there is really one in view) belongs to the worst days of the Long Parliament, when the leaders of that body had advanced from Re form to usurpation, and were grasping at all the legislative and executive powers. If Sir Charles Manners Sutton were now to be stigmatized by the decision of the House of Commons, what counsel lor would on any future emergency be bold enough to give his Sovereign advice in opposition to the inte rests of a party in power, if it were probable (in the present instance, happily, it is not so) that that party would on some future day have influence enough to condemn him by a majority of votes for his counsel, however honestly and faithfully delivered ? Demo cratic agitation against individuals is one of the most fatal instruments of revolutionary policy, and Ireland sends us heads and hearts capable of wielding it with a mingled fraud and ferocity unknown in the later ages of English history. The feeble hands of those who now think that they give the engine its main im pulse and direction would in vain be stretched to arres its progress. The same power which is now exerted for the degradation of an eminent and accomplished man may, if reinforced by success, be put forth with equal effect to deprive some other alleged delinquent Of fortune, liberty, or country. The Vestry Com mittees of Marylebone and Finsbury may be soon taught to clamour for more awful sacrifices. To.day COURT 0 WEBB V. WEEDON. In this case which was not concluded yesterday when we went to press, the examination of witnesses for the plaintiff, after continuing till nearly twenty minutes to eight o'clock, was postponed till this day. EXCHEQUER COURT. WOOLLASTON V. WOOD. This action was brought by Mr. Woollaston, a wine merchant, to recover from Mr. Wood, one of the proprie tors of the Lowther Rooms, 231. 155., the remainder of an account due for wine supplied to the defendant in 1828 and 1834. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff to the full amount. TAYLOR V. HILLARY. A new trial was moved for in this case, and moved for last term. The plaintiff sought to recover 1671. 12s. from the defendant, for noyeau and other goods; supplied to a person named Holt, for whom the defendant had agreed to become guarantee. Mr. BUTT having opened the pleadings, Mr. BARSTOW, for the plaintiff, stated that the plaintiff agreed to supply Holt with goods on receiving a guarantee from the defendant, wherein the defendant promiSed to be answerable for goods not exceeding 200/., and called wit nesses, who proved that the goods had been left at various places for Holt. The plaintiff was nonsuited. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY. RICHARD MEE RAIKES ' S BANKRUPTCY. A meeting of the creditors of Mr. R. M. Raikes, late Governor of the Bank of England, was held to-day for the further proof of debts and the declaration of a dividend. An application was made on behalf of Count Demidoff to prove against the separate estate of the bankrupt for 3,6001., which was opposed on the ground that p. consider ably smaller amount was due, the major part of the claim having existed before Mr. T. Raikes seceded from the firm. It was agreed, after some discussion, that no dividend should be declared for two months, to allow time to com municate with the Count in Russia. It was stated in the course of the discussion that 85,000/. had been proved on the separate estate, and 15,0001, on the joint estate, and that a dividend of 2s. in the pound might be declared on the separate estate. Mr. Impey, of Cheltenham, appeared to claim a sum for money deposited with the firm by his sister-in-law before she left England for India, for the education of some chil dren, he having been appointed guardian. Mr. Commissioner EvANs stated that it would be neces sary to obtain the lady's affidavit before the proof could be allowed. The dividend was postponed for two months, and further proceedings were adjourned. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. Mr. James Montgomery Serymgeortr, an artist, was op posed by Mr. Ch ADWICK JONES on the part of a Mr. George Peters. He was supported by Mr. COOKE, with whom was MT. WOODROFFE. Mr. JONES remarked that the conduct of the artist was painted in such colours in his brief, that he should endea vour to bring him within the discretionary clause. The insolvent had painted the portrait of the opposing creditor, who is a plumber at Epsom. He charged him fifteen guineas, but Mr. Peters considered he had made him a present of it, and he defended an action brought against him for the recovery of the money. The matter was re ferred, and an award was made in favour of Mr. Peters. The insolvent was now imprisoned for the costs, and was examined as to his various paintings. He had painted " The Vision of Saint John," which was in the possession of Lady Arundell. He estimated it worth, when finished, 2501., and her Ladyship had advanced him money on it. Her Ladyship had enabled him to petition the Court for his discharge. He had recently sent to the British Gal lery for exhibition, " The Death of Haidee" (from " Don Juan") and " Moses and Aaron before Pharoah." He had, since his imprisonment, sketched " Byron's Dream." It was contended that the paintingS, with the exception of the one in the possession of Lady Arundell, should be given up for the benefit of the creditors. The COURT was of the same opinion, and the case stood over to a future day. The insolvent, it was understood, would be discharged. COURT OF REQUESTS. A. master sweep named Lilly, whose countenance, be decked as it was with at least a week's professional glean ings, partook but little of the blonde of his vegetable name sake, appeared to answer the complaint of John Groves, a juvenile 'squire of the scraper, who made his debut before the Court disguised in a clean shirt. The COMMISSIONER having demanded the nature of the debt, Groves said he had been hired by the defendant, at the rate of one shilling and sixpence a week, as his acting aide-de-camp, when, after three months' active exertion in the work of cleansing and purification, he found that he could not procure any money from his employer, and, fear ing that a longer stay would result in his gaining a loss, he accordingly discharged himself on one fine morning, imme diately after the conclusion of his first quarter. Lilly—Wasn't I the first person who gave you a decent profession, and taught you how to rise in the world ? Groves—Faiks you taught I to rise high enough and often enough in the people's " chimbleys," but it's little I got by that. The COMMISSIONER—Did you make the agreement he has mentioned? Do you owe him the eighteen shillings? Lilly—l hadn't no agreement with him. I gave him board and lodging, and clothing and washing. Groves—Oh, your Worship, he gave me no clothing but one shirt, and that I left behind me ; and your Honour knows that a sweep's washing is like what the Hampshire man shot at, and that's nothing at all. The COMMISSIONER then took complainant's oath as to what he had stated, and made an order in his favour, con sidering that the sum demanded was but a moderate remu neration for such an employment. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. G UILD-HALL. Yesterday Willie; --Taylor, a journeyman -smith, was brought before Sir CHAPMAN MARSHALL, charged with burglariously entering the house of Mr. Bradbee, who keeps a trimming warehouse in Newgate-street. Mr. Bradbee was alarmed about five o'clock on Sunday morning by Miss Sweetlove, a young lady who sleeps in the front room on the second floor, and who aroused him with the information that she believed a man was trying to get into her bed-room window, though it might be hat she had mistaken a scaffold-pole for a man, as the front of the house is undergoing some repairs. He admitted her to his room, loaded a pistol with small shot, and then went, accompanied by his wife and Miss Sweetlove, to search the room on the second floor. The ladies entered the room first with a light, he following close to them, but they immediately turned about and retreated without saying a word, leaving him in the dark. There was, however, sufficient light in the room to enable him to see something moving, and be instantly fired. Fortunately he only aimed at the shadow instead of the man. In the meantime the ladies raised an alarm at the back of the house, and Lawes, the patrol, and some watchmen coming up, burst open the outer door, and secured the prisoner on the stairs. Miss Sweetlove was alarmed by hearing the window fall, the prisoner having let it slip from his hands on his first attempt to open it. She then saw him at the window, and immediately left the room to awaken Mr. Bradbee. Lawes, the patrol, said the prisoner's face was very black, like a sweep's, and he had been troublesome at a fire in Newgate-street about half an hour before. He then said he was a smith, and that he had no lodging to go to. The prisoner at first stared stupidly, and made no reply when the Alderman put some questions to him. The Al derman doubted his sanity ; but it appeared that though be had been unwilling to answer the officers when they captured him, he had-conversed freely in the Compter on Sunday. Sir CHAPMAN MARSHALL asked the prisoner again what his object in entering this young lady's bedchamber was ? The prisoner did not know. Sir CHAPMAN MARSHALL asked who he had worked for ? Prisoner said, nobody in this town. He had come up in search of employment from Gainsborough only a fort night ago. The Alderman committed him for trial. by it, detained him and sent for a policeman, when he said that it belonged to his brother, who had been in the employ of Messrs. Storr and Mortimer, the goldsmiths and jewel lers, of Bond-street. The policeman went there, and by directions of Mr. Mortimer the prisoner was taken to the station-house. John Hunt, clerk to Messrs. Storr and Mortimer, said that the prisoner's brother was assistant-clerk in the count ing -house, but absented himself about three weeks since. Lady Brudenell was one of their customers, and he believed the top produced to he the property of his employers. The prisoner was then remanded till Wednesday for the attendance of Mr. Mortimer, but on the application of Mr. Humphreys, the solicitor who attended in his behalf, he was liberated on finding good bail for his appearance on that day. MARLBORO UGH-STREET. Thomas Davis, an ex-policeman, was yesterday brought before Mr. CHAMBERS, charged with having imposed upon Edward Chamberlain, Esq., of No. 7, Norfolk-street, Park lane, by means of a false character. The prisoner was fined 201., or committed for the full period of three months. A gentleman named Mead, residing at No. 10, South street, Park-lane, brought one of Ady's circulars to Mr. Chambers, which had been addressed to him, offering, as usual, on payment of 20/., to communicate something to his advantage. In order to make the bait more attractive the circular was indorsed " 107/. 9s. 3d., by death of a near relative." As the circular was dated on the day when Ady took his trial he conceived there must be a gang of impostors who were still carrying on their tricks, and there fore it would be but right to put the public on their guard. Mr. CHAMBERS said the public had been cautioned on the same subject, and he thought it almost impossible such a trick could again succeed. TOTAL LOSS OF THE SIR THOMAS NIUNRO. We have been favoured, by a commercial house in the city, with the perusal of a letter from the Captain of the above vessel, containing an account of her total loss an the night of the 10th of December, on the Va randhivo Reef, at the west end of the Island of Bona vista, one of of the Cape de Verd Islands, and of the arrival of himself and crew, and passengers, at Ply mouth, in the American brig Maine, of Boston, Cap tain Williams. The following is Captain Carver's ac- count of this disaster : " At 10 a.m. on the 10th of December we made the Isle of Sal to the S. W., and at 3 P. M. made the Island of Bonavista, bearing from S. by W. to west the wind being well to the southward of east, and the weather very hazy ; and finding that we had been driven considerably to the westward by a current, and not able to weather the N. E. point, we bore up to run to leeward under easy sale ; at 6 P. M. saw a reef with breakers on the starboard quarter, which, myself and officers supposed was the Leton rocks and reef ; the weather being so very hazy at the time, it made the land very deceitful, appear ing much farther off ; we hauled up to the southward to give this reef a birth, the west point, which runs out low, not being visible, on account of the haze ; about 7 r. Ai., the ship struck on a coral reef ; the sea being very smooth ; did not perceive a breaker until the ship struck, when we perceived ourselves surrounded on both sides ; all hands being on deck at the time, as well as myself and officers, and many of the crew on the forecastle, looking out ; al most immediately the rudder went, and took with it part of the stern-post, and stove in the counter ; sounded the pomps, and found the ship making water very fast, striking uery heavy, and forging further in shore with every roller ; lowered the quarter-boats down, fired signal guns, and showed blue lights to attract the attention of any inhabi tants—if any—to render us assistance, since it was useless to attempt to carry out an anchor to heave the ship off, as the lower hold was then full of water, and the wind and sea having considerably increased ; and the night coming on very dark, we with much difficulty got the launch out, the ship rolling very heavy at the time ; the scene now on boird was dreadful: with the pa,sengers, wo men, and children—easily for you to imagine, but difficult for rue to describe : my greatest appre hension was the wine and spirits, the loss of life it :night occasion, and it required, I assure you, no trifling exertion on my part to prevent its fatal consequences. About Bh. 30m. P.M. we got first the females and children, then the male passengers, into the launch, with a part of the crew, in charge of the boatswain, wish the surgeon, and ordered them to anchor to windward, or clear of the ship, in case the masts should fall, which I was very ap prehensive of ; the cutter was in charge of the second, officer, and the jolly-boat of the third officer ; put some provisions, water, clothing, two chronometers, sextants, quadrants, ship's papers, and what things we could hastily get at into the jolly-boat, which, soon after she shoved off from the ship, swamped, and everything was lost except the chronometers, which were lashed to the thawls, and saved by the cutter, which was sent to pick up the boat's crew. Towards midnight, seeing the impossibility of doing anything further, the • surgeon having returned to the ship from the launch, stating it to be the anxious wish of the passengers for me to join them, and myself, chief-officer, and those that remained, expect ing the ship to go to pieces, the 'tween decks knee-deep in water, myself, chief-mate, carpenter, and four of the crew, being all that remained, left the ship and joined the launch, being in all 66 persons-56 in the launch and 10 in the cutter, the jolly-boat being lost. At day-break we slipped from the grapnel, it having hooked a rock, and pulled to windward, to endeavour to land the passengers. The wind and sea having increased, I dispatched the chief officer with the cutter in-shore, to look for a safe place to land between the breakers, which were very heavy. At noon she returned, having effected a landing, when she took us in tow, and pulled in-shore ; at 2h. 30m. P.M., with the assistance of three fishing boats, got all the passengers safely landed ; anchored the launch off with a large stone, and hauled the cutter up on the sandy beach, and issued a small portion of provisions to each person. At 3 P.M. launched the cutter, and sent her with the chief officer carpenter, boatswain, and four of the crew (who volunteer ed) to the wreck, followed by myself in a shore-boat, to endeavour to save what was possible. At 6 P.M. I re turned on shore with the cutter, with some provisions and a few articles of clothing ; the sea having made a fair breach in the 'tween decks, sweeping everything away—all the ca bins,, bulkheads, &c. I left the chief officer with the launch, to look after the wreck, with instructions to hang on to a Por tuguese schooner, which had anchored close by, and supplied him with a boat's anchor and cable to keep clear for the night. Next morning the American brig Maine, Capt. Wil liams, came down from English roads, and anchored close by. When I returned in the evening from the wreck to the shore, Hound that Captain Williams, with a humanity that does him infinite credit, had taken all the female and male passengers to a village about four or five miles in the interior, and procured them lodgings. In the morning I went down to the beach , attended by the surgeon, consi derably before daybreak, and found the sea making a com plete breach over all—the wreck at times not to be seen. I then deemed it proper, after consulting with my officers, who were with the crew that remained in charge and guard ing the beach, to proceed with the surgeon to English Port to make a report to the Governor of our. melancholy and destitute condition, and implore his assistance, the passen gers having lost everything but what they had on their backs. At eight P. at., the chief officer returned on shore, having been swamped with the boat's crew in landing ; he had found it impracticable to go near the wreck, on account of the heavy breakers. About nine o'clock I returned, with orders from the Governor to send the passengers up to English Port, and with assurances of every assistance and attention possible. Next morning I dispatched the steer age passengers, under the care of the carpenter and two of the crew, on donkeys, to English Port. Myself and offi cers went to the beach, but found it impossible to launch the boat to go to the wreck, on account of the high sea, the boat having swamped several times in the attempt. Dispatched the third officer, with what baggage there was, on donkeys, with two of the crew, to English Port. " The next day (Sunday) myself and chief officer went to the beach, and in a hired boat went off to the wreck, and made an appointment with the captains of the Ameri can brig and Portuguese schooner to meet them the next day at the Governor's to arrange with them about saving any of the stores of the vessel and cargo, and the amount of salvage ; myself and chief mate then returned on shore, leaving part of the crew on board the Portuguese schooner. At six P. at., dispatched the greater part of the cabin pas sengers, under the care of the first and second officers and a part of the crew, to English Port, and next morning I took the remainder up, and the governor provided us with accommodation in the different houses, and treated us with every kindness and attention up to the time of our ern- , barking in the brig Maine, and I beg particularly to notice the kindness and unremitting attention of Captain Williams, the whole time we have been on board, to all of us ; no person could have possibly devoted himself more effectually for our comfort than he has done." SERIOUS ACCIDENT.—We regret to state that as - Rothschild, jun., Esq., son of the eminent banker, ac companied by his groom, was driving in a tilbury down Ox ford-street yesterday morning, on his way into the city, the horse be'came unmanageable at the end of Bond-street, and galloped off at a furious rate, and the tilbury coming in colli sion with the Champion, Shrewsbury coach, was overset, and Mr. Rothschild and his groom were precipitated to the ground with great violence. Several persons immediately ran to their assistance, as they were lying apparently senseless; but on lifting them from the ground, it was discovered that neither Mr. R. or his groom had received any particular injury. The horse was secured, but the tilbury was broken in pieces. MAR YLEB ONE. Yesterday John Baldwin, a man in the employ of Messrs. John and Robert Laurie (nephews and successors to Sir Peter Laurie), saddlers and harness-makers, No. 296, Ox ford-street, was placed at the bar before the sitting Magi strates, Messrs. RAWLINSON and SHUTT, charged with robbing the firm of a vast quantity of property. He was fully committed to Newgate for trial, and the Magistrates not feeling satisfied with the conduct of Mr. Cutler, who had purchased some of the property, ordered him to find bail for his appearance to gave evidence at the trial. Ambrose Cook, the son of a master tailor, residing at No. 26, South Molton-street, Oxford -street, was placed at the bar, charged on suspicion of stealing a massive silver gilt top of a dressing-case bottle, bearing the arms and initials, of Lady Brudenell. The prisoner offered the before-mentioned' article to pledge at the shop of Mr. Tomlinson, George-street, Bry anstou-square, who, suspecting that be had pot come honestly PRIVY COUNCIL. The Lords of his Majesty's Privy Council held a meet ing yesterday in the Council Chamber, which was attended by the Lord President, the Vice-Chancellor, Mr. Baron Parke, the Right Honourables Sir John Nicholl and Thos. Erskine. The Lords were occupied during their sitting, with hear ing the objections, by way of appeal, of Mr. Burge, as the agent for the island of Jamaica, against, the rules of the Commissioners of the West India Compensation Fund. The appeal was supported by Mr. Burge, K.C., and Mr. Bethell. By the 47th section of the Abolition Act the Commissioners were required to institute a full and exact inquiry into all the circumstances connected with each of the eolonies, which ought in justice or equity to regulate the apportionment of the Compensation Fund, and afterwards to draw up and frame all such general rules (regard being had to the laws and usages in force in each colony respectively) as to them might seem best adapted in each colony for se curing the just and equitable distribution of the funds. It was contended that the Commissioners had not made this full inquiry here required, but in the general rules they had issued, had taken, as the principle of apportion ment the ordinary rule of priority of incumbrance—thus benefitting the mortgagee of an estate to the exclusion of the right of the mortgagor, and satisfying the prior in cumbrance without any regard to the capability of the owner of an estate to continue its cultivation ; whereas the Legislature intended that all persons bearing a portion of the loss by the abolition of slavery should be entitled to a portion of the compensation. The rule of the Commis sioners, however, would except the first mortgagee from loss, and would be an indemnity to one class of persons only, viz., the holders of incumbrances. The negroes in Jamaica alone had been valued at twenty one millions, so that the assumption of the appellants that the amount of compensation was less than the value of the negroes was justified. It was further contended that an extension of time be yond the term fixed by the Commissioners should be allowed to parties to prefer their claims in the colonies. Objections were also urged against the appointment of trustees by the Commissioners in certain cases, to the prin ciple of calculating the compensations per capita, and on several points. Mr. Wigram, K.C., afterwards addressed their Lord ships on an appeal from Messrs. Bentinck against an award of the Commissioners. Their Lordships adjourned at four o'clock. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. HARMS V. DALBY. This was an action to recover damages from the de fendant, an attorney, for negligence in the conduct of the plaintiff's cause in Chancery. The plaintiff was the son of a person who was the tenant in tail of some property, and who persuaded his son, upon the promise of some equiva lent to be secured to him, to cut off the entail, and enable his father to sell the estate. When the father died the son did not think himself sufficiently provided for in the will, and he filed his bill in Chancery. That bill was dismissed for want of prosecution, and the defendant was charged with having improperly neglected the matter, so as to pro duce this event. The Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, damages 22.3/. 10s., that being the sum which the plaintiff had been obliged to pay in consequence of the neg ligence of the defendant. THE ASSAULT. At the close of the day the ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated that he was instructed on the part of Mr. O'Gorman Mahon to express his sincere regret and contrition for what had hap pened in the early part of the day in relation to Mr. Wigley. Mr. Justice COLERIDGE said that that declaration was very different from the one conveyed to him in a paper sent to him from Mr. Mahon, which he had just been read ing, and which, instead of expressing regret, was directed to the purpose of justifying all that Mr. Mahon had done. N PLEAS TRIBUNE DE ,E INST .&NCE. EXTRAORDINARY PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE DUKE: OF CAMBRIDGE AND DUKE oF BRUNSWICK. At. the sitting of the above Court at Paris, on the 26th of January, a process was instituted by the Duke of Can abridge against Charles, ex-Duke of Brunswick, for the pur pose of having all the property of the latter placed in his ha ads, ac cording to arrangements to that effect which wer a repre sented to have been made between his Majesty Wil ham IV., 6e reigning Duke of Brunswick, the Duke of C ambridge, and other members of the family, and by which the Duke of unswick was also placed under the tutelage of the Duke of Cambridge, who now sought, through the medium of the French Courts of Law, to obtain possession of the Duke's property in France. Duke Charles appeared in person to plead his cause. M. Duvergier, advocate for the Duke of Cambridge ad dressed the Court. He said the Court had not to put in exe cution a judgment delivered in a foreign country, between two foreigners, but one of the fundamental laws of the kingdom of France, which acknowledged individual rights. The Duke of Cambridge was entitled in his capacity of guardian to demand of that Court a restitution of all the property which had been taken from Duke Charles, and which he was at present pos sessed of. In the month of September, 11:330, the Duke was expelled from his kingdom. The Duke.—That is not true ; I was not expelled ; I left it voluntarily. M. De Belleyme ( President). —Do not interrupt the coun sel. If he states anything which is not true, you will have an opportunity of making an answer to it. The Duke.—l cannot patiently listen to such false state ments. M. Duvergier then proceeded. Duke Charles was ex pelled in the month of September, 1830, from his kingdom. An insurrection had previously taken place, which led to this result. His castle was burnt to the ground. A Com mittee of the different States was convoked, and his brother, Duke William, was placed at the head of the Provi sional Government. The German Diet confirmed this step, and application was made to the other members of the family for their approval of it likewise. In conse quence of this the King of England, his three brothers , the Dukes of Sussex, Cumberland, and Cambridge, and Duke \Villiam of Brunswick met together, and held a deliberation upon the subject, the result of which was , that the Throne of Brunswick was declared vacant through the incapacity of its legitimate owner to retain it, and Duke William of Brunswick. Luneburg Oels, being the next heir to the Throne, was called upon to take possession of it. In consequence of this act, which was approved by the Ger man Diet, Duke William mounted the Throne. After this Duke Charles went into England, Austria, and Spain, where he took all possible means to possess himself of his kingdom , by the purchase of arms, ammunition, &c., which, however, led to no other result but to place his name before the public in such a manner as to cause great grief to his family. This in duced them to endeavour to put a stop to his prodigal expen diture and waste, and to prevent him from dissipating a fortune which should have enabled him to support a station suitable to his rank, and in order to effect this object, they placed him under the guardianship of the Duke of Cambridge, Viceroy of Hanover. This deed was transmitted to the Minister of Foreign Affairs in France, by whom it was sent to the Pro cureur du Roi, and by him delivered to Duke Charles. BY virtue of this deed, or act, the Duke of Cambridge DOW de wanded that the whole of the property belonging to Dube Charles in France should be placed in his hands. He had ° right to make this demand, and was authorised to do so by Article S of the Civil Code. At the conclusion of the address, the advocate for the Duke of Cambridge, Duke Charles rose and proceeded to answer him. He said the King of England, his uncle, and Prince Wit', Liam of Brunswick, had cited him before that Court. He did not, however, appear there in acknowledgment of their righ t to do so, but by his own free will, as by his birth he was ame nable to no other judge than God. The Duke then proceeded to observe, that his relations had no right to act towards biro as their had done ; the King of England could not have acted in such a manner towards one of his own subjects, much 105 to a Prince of a foreign kingdom. It would appear as though f that branch of his family which was seated upon the throne ° England were not satisfied with the scandal occasioned by the trial of his aunt, Queen Caroline, but wished to make him fresh object of scandal. They bad all-ged, as a ground fc r placing him under guardianship, the fact of the pretended Pre' parations made by him to regain possession of his kingtiere' but if that were an offence, they might have taken a si mil r r step in the case of Don Carlos and the Duchess of Be' rn and a still stronger case for their interference would be tb ° conduct of his uncle the King of Holland, who, more than 0 1 1 one else, would require to be placed under a guardian for 10:: ing resisted the combined forces of France and England , fort', must be acknowledged that he had run a much greater risk c° destroying his fortune than he (the Duke of Brunswick), f °t the preparations that he had made were purely imaginary 0° the part of his enemies, and were brought forward for the par' pose of injuring Lim. His uncle told him more than a h°l3 ; dred times that if he did not act in every respect as he vvishel he would retain him all his life in captivity, and perhaps (e., him to be pronounced mad, and he knew for a fact that D_ L i private physician had been applied to, to prove that be 076 attacked with mental alienation. He went on to state that , owed his present freedom to the intervention of the Aust l4 7f Cabinet. During the time he had occupied the throne his ancestors, he had given general satisfaction in his kiag; dom ; but his uncle was anxious by every means in his W e ' to possess himself of the Duchy, which severed, as it wer e ', into two portions the kingdom of Hanover, and thus t it againstgratify that family hatred him, which had been gre et „t augmented by the Princess of Brunswick, Queea. v b England. The Duke then went on to relate the injuries wb le , he alleged had been inflicted upon him by his family. Aill° ° 7 t other grievances, lie stated that they had circulated a re l 3 ;1, that he had abjured his religion, and had made a compact his Satannic Majesty. He likewise stated that his family hr o " deprived him of no less than 100,000,000 f., and they o° , wished to possess themselves of the little property which rie, mained in France belonging to him. The Duke conc lude long address by entreating the Court to protect him, and ° to suffer him to be deprived of his fortune. The Tribunal, according to the directions of M. Glaucl ass o Avocat du Roi, decided that it had no power to interfer e s io prayed for, and authorised the Duke of Brunswick to ri o t possession of all property belonging to him in France , condemned the plaintiff to pay the costs of the present suit' The following singular circumstance occurred lat el g in Paris :—A German Baron, who had married a Ptitlo: Englishwoman, saidto be a native of Greenwich, and bY bo he had two children, died at the latter end of the last year' i believe in the course of November. The mother, affe cted her loss, sunk in despondency, and shortly after died frolic , t e h o cessive grief. The children at that time were at one of t o boarding-schools in the neighbourhood of Boulogne, bat t o proprietors of the school, finding that no relations calneo claim them, was on the point of discarding them, whe.d. merchant, an Englishman, humanely took them into his b ou ;d They had not been long with him when a Mr. H. endeav°l„lnt, to prevail upon one of the servants, by the bribe of 3tvice, to murder the children. The servant informed her ola s ge. and proceedings were had in the Courts of Paris against bo H., but he has quitted the place. The gentleman, vila° oo t to this time fostered the children, is endeavouring to fin their relatives in England, and has actually sent over a Vol thoroughly authorised for that purpose. It is believed bi d) the father of the children has left considerable property'' '. Mr. H., it is supposed, has converted to his own use. ..ey, MARRIED. 00 . On the 9th inst., at St. Luke's, Chelsea, Frederick bet', Ebhart, Esq., late Captain of the 45th }legiment, to Ell i e eldest daughter of the late Major Ebhart, Commandant Hospital DIED. On the 7th inst., Lady Long, wife of Sir William ' t e ll Kempston Bury, Bedfordshire. rt., TV" On the 4th inst., in her 75th year, A the Priory, , - , ‘ - 00 , Mrs. Anthony Clarke. ha On the 6th inst., at Letton, in Norfolk, aged seven year s ' J only daughter of the late Henry Wodehouse, Esq. „ 00 , On the Bth inst., Sarah, the wife of Mr. George uu — 1 Bowling-street, Clerkenwell, in her 28th year. On the 3d inst., Sarah, the wife of Jonah Smith Well s ' // 5 9 Fortess-terrace, Kentish-town, and daughter of the late I th Chance, of Birmingham. fA On the sth inst., at Walton-upon-Thames, Richard Ne.r 1 in his 67th y. On the 29th ear ult., at Herstmonceux, Eliza, eldest chief; James Young, Esq. On the 12th ult., at Halifax, Nova Scotia, Mr. Arch. Sjien, On the 6th inst., Charles, the infant son of Charl es Esq., of Bradford, Wilts, aged four months and three wee'l s 'e t p On the sth inst., at Greenwich, Nancy, the wife of M r ' o f Carpenter, and eldest daughter of the late Captain Moral' A , same place. ht 09- On the sth inst., at Kentish-town, Mr. Samuel Wrig- ce in his 70th year. est' On the sth inst., at Clare Hall, Herts, in her 90th Y therine, relict of the late James Sharp, Esq. On the 9th inst., in Albion-road, Stoke Newington, Cawthorne, aged 76, one of the Society of Friends. A wl On the 7th inst., Frances, second daughter of \Valiant *' Esq., of Wilton-crescent, Belgrave-square. On the sth inst, at Kingsland, Mrs. Elizabeth Tovrseni of On the 3d inst., at Woolwich, Captain Willia m Star Hebb' Royal Marines. ~attel On the Bth inst.., at Wynyan-house, Fulham , '-'••-• Esq., in his 81st year. • lt 1/3 On the 9th inst., aged 48, Mary, widow of Frederic 1, good, Esq., of York-place. 1 719 ' , On the 7th inst., at Upper Kensington-gore, eldest daughter of the late Henry Phillott, Esq• e t i London : Printed and Published by MURDO yolirao 112, Strand, at The Sun Office, No. 112, Stran_dt to of Middlesex. RYAN'S Pate ,Sof t3heAgpalit O p repar e KYAN'S 1 GR" near prepare Tim the Pat:lit With prepar( XYAN'S TI MB will be effect rection of The Prop' persons of ap buses. Specimens Inspected at t 4........... __l. aysv C arliciteitoy A o si f t str eet at this Estab tion b e z i E 111 year,'d it nli ;14 1i liar getsall ' e l h stncilr n ue s aYou : se e d yUprne z oe , aao d e r l dAfdßrbßl e s ! eits e di a 2 :h a lit l ne,kvNi° 2 n l y et'saen . l d i tP:rs t il. 1 as e :: o f n o e r hereto fore, f client to estab: now on sale i! Ind the most which are for . de l i ... Ps in ever ~ .la f rom its knish d ' in ...............e_2.11 THE a pia respectf One_quallecl I st. The Ci oXtensive and e . ° : r ery de scr i pt i i m onths' warrar The WA ..c , TOOII I)late., &C Or bottle,. with 3 d. The F 1.7 the largest and lured for sale ; 4th. Th e Ni !lore and curio %tee. I ,"ALOiDN o f ORTUi is hereby ,_,e li rt b li z v ip e roe r fv e ep s n e ot r r v ftr i u r 2 ',lle time of the 4uly, 1 833, off tion, or b leavi since died, that *rant allowed b' be made • instant in !enant of her M l ti e s PetwThr i ee ossceteda repr e sent fivest n hur , °rAie a e n sN('a d e(l: in , at each payn `u present power without their„„ . cer lett ers parties cli o,ers of admini! rd leave the san Payments will t India Char tor r ,,Robinso n (l i s, s _uolg• to the fol .0 Many person s Shares of Offic Ili ente with— amounts p ""mletion of one 1414 P re • t b • k t , d cell) , ° lle-half per L yndon, Feb. ; ' T HE GENUI 0 REMC elluine Sale of Q OO A T?s, Cutlery rine Baro tn e WHICH At the Auction Ts, at T we l ve HIS Sup The Plated goo' „N s , tea an d co if „ N s, and table ,The Glass coin' ' grn rucrs, tumbler: This Superb St' Ik 4talogue s may be e. Auction Alart ; an. INLIPN,s S OGItTATI A e minent medics the fact b eyon d di th stor.„l, and .ase, and goner; desirable purpos(:'l .. l ed with the Sul Pvicl aperient drugs reyedrov superior to complaints, is kid, o ppression al spasms, and all disc 414' eXeellent resto:t ,t!"'le table, 8 they i te etornac., imPr„! `tert. Females w' them, as they p i the ski as a clear, h' Plethoric habit, wh , geti ht, d rows i ness, Hy ingredient that 'lley should be kel deli illness, for, b) pLtkps, spasms; fe' r Prove fatal, ir I.pepared only I the "vhitechaise rl, in tin Belief f Stirlin A k a_ op. elief in ti from which 1 was a mong 40wever, serve as n 1_144 medicine. Th' -Ave so ught fatally eonsequently lapsed ties and crouch ll'lltstieililtitl:ern''laitel y tiell i ; : c d ral: U rneo l agtn : ; f ee a rmsnse , dl tesPondence with gr Nve 'ler ow n country, bi e years has our pe' d eminently su e st solicitations ,7kt r ess: th e followii s by a rnedical frie melently excusable b Dear sirs ---MY !I'tAertfelt thanks ; wl ti tude. May yot nrs in the treats 'led the skill of yc 1832." ,There are many di Zapar e d w i t h the ; centexhu igl q47. l : o4siy3 l ,:e l o l ;t g uhrtrahe e npe ff vkreagacert pi t a b . ioty o s oi i n e, t uh o i es : nt ngin theawe ccessful ; and as sf Ne and diffident ma ,ktssßs. GoS! I!teeir residence ; and 1 1 , 1 1 be treated sucee A., irnmediately ansi r ni ce and Medicine kll'o °rWarded to any ET" Protected from eeur, as the Al( obser GOSS J st publish e ,11 , tit —lll. 11, 4 a familia) Yri p.tANTA,add r( , Dri tri ,.„ r t, , tre; ,Il ay b e had a a t 23, ; 86, Trc B THS. hter• On the 7th inst , Mrs. Newton, 95 , Cheapside , of a dal4.-,00, On the 6th inst., at the Cedars, South Lambeth, Mrs. ki°4l' of a still-born son. On the 3d inst., the lady of Jonah Smith Wells, Esq., of foro.l terrace, Kentish-town, of a daughter. On the 6th inst., at Dulwich, Surrey, Mrs. G. D. Hairle°`''' a daughter. d ie Oh the 4th inst., at Fonthill-place, Clapham-rise, the 01 Nicholas G. Glass, Esq., of a son. On the 6th inst., at Springfield, Upper Cla.pton, Mrs J. . Moens, of a son. 00 . On the 6th inst., at Higham-hill, Walthamstow , the ladY F. Mieville, Esq., of a daughter. Or On the 7th inst., in Leigh-street, Burton-crescent, Mrs• way, of a daughter. z ." le P On the 7th inst., the lady of Dr. Alexander, Hon. Company's service, of a daughter. On the 7th inst., the lady of Ernst Wolff, Esq., Cam- - grove, of a son.