The Sun. — London, England, 1835-05-02 00:00:00

„ i SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. We trust that we shall be gratified in fulfilling our promise to the public, by furnishing our readers to day with the earliest account of the proceedings at the nomination of the Candidates for South Devon. We now address ourselves to the discharge of a still more important, we may say the paramount duty, of im pressing on the electors of Devon the necessity of a vigorous, combined, and determined exertion to defeat the machinations of a party, who would detach them from their allegiance to liberty, and cover them with ind.2lible disgrace, by seducing them to betray the great trins of the elective franchise. • Men of Desron ! now is the moment to " show the mettle of your psture. You have before you, on the one hand, the man wild was foremost in the accomplishment of that great Reform to which many of you owe the privilege of your votes. Will you turn, then, against the giver ? You have before you, on the other hand, the protege of a party, who struggled in deadly opposition to withhold that right, and who now audaciously challenge its exercise in their favour. Can you be so vile as, rejecting the friend of your freedom, to choose its direct enemy as your representative? Impossible ! Look to Man chester, to Nottingham, to Cambridge; &c., and prove that you also have sufficient intelligence to appreciate the true interests of the country, and sufficient integrity to reject the minion which an unprincipled faction wculd impose upon you. The question which hurled the Peel Ministry from power is the most important of those which the reform in the representative system was designed to render of practical good. It is a question involving a principle of enlarged benevolence as opposed to bigotry—of justice and humanity as opposed to cruelty and barbarism_ —a principle calculated to heal the bleeding wrongs of Ireland, and bring that people, by means of education, to appre ciate truth—the only basis of religion. And why do the Tories concentrate and invoke all the powers of evil to oust Lord John Russell from your representa tion ? Why, because he is the champion of this good, this great, and glorious cause. Will you desert him in the crisis, and lend yourselves to the infamous de signs of Toryism ? Here you have before you the advocate of justice, humanity, and freedom ; there, the mere tool of _a party, whose best claim to your suf frages is the faithless promise to correct the wrongs of their own perpetration. The sole end of the Tories is to counteract the benefits of the Reform Bill, to lead the people back to bondage. Be not duped by their mock professions : while they grasp your hand they have the dagger concealed in their bosoms. Will you advance to that freedom which is the first blessing of existence, or return to the slavery in which a faction has so long kept your destinies enthralled ? It is not a personal interest that is involved in the struggle ; it is the general interests of the country and posterity. By submissie to Tory misrule, our fathers have left us the victimsNf debt, discord, and deso lation ; but the day of regeneration is at hand— now is the time to establish a better order, and by renovating, to preserve, the national institutions. Will you leave war as the inheritance , of posterity, when you might leave peace ? Should your chil dren, roused by the spirit of freedom inherent in man, be called upon to fight the battle which your decision might now terminate, they may not curse, but they must despise their base, dastard, and corrupt ancestry. But we have no such apprehension ; you know your friend, and will support him—you know the right, and will defend it ; and though this genera tion may not see the accomplishment of all the good to be secured by success, you shall open a way to your children to progress to a glorious freedom, and its con sequent prosperity. " For freedom's battle once begun, Bequeathed by bleeding sire to son, • • Though baffled oft, is ever won." Hence, men of Deforri we call upon you, for your own sake—for the sake of your country, your child ren, and for the sake of Ireland, who, in her torture, looks to you as the arbiters of her destiny, to sacrifice all minor objects to these-.mighty considerations, and return Lord John Russell as your representative in Pal•liament.—Morning Advertiser. The public will recollect the very remarkable report presente a d by the Church Commissioners a short time before the dissolution of the late AdministratioNsand the approbation with which it was generally received throughout the country. The report recommended the approximation of bishoprics to each other, in ex tent of territorial jurisdiction, and of annual value, and so the diminution of the motives to translation. It fur ther recommended the abolition of commendams with bishoprics, whether with or without • the cure of souls. There certainly was no indication in a report of this nature of any indisposition on the part of the heads of the Church to introduce reform. We verily believe that no Whig Administration would have dared to originate changes of so decided a character into the, Church. The ration will, therefore, naturally feel an anxiety about the existence of such a commission under th e new Administration. We hope it will not be dis solved. The highest praise of it is, indeed, a wish on the part of Lord Melbourne to the same effect as our own, that the Right Rev. Prelates who made up the clerical part of that commission would continue their la!)ours. Whom they may have offered to them as lay colleagues in the places of Sir R. Peel, Lord Lynd hurst, and Mr. Goulburn, we know not ; but we trust that the new associates will be respectable, and actu ated by the same spirit as their predecessors. There is still much to do. The deans and chapters are to be dealt with ; and whoever considers how much the revenues of those bodies are• connected and intertwined with every species of property throughout the realm, must acknowledge that the subject is indeed a very delicate one, and requires the utmost temper and judg ment. The prelates who arc members of the Commis sion are, we believe, the two Archbishops, and the B'sliops of London, Lincoln, and Peterborough.— Times. We have to add Penryn and Falmouth to the list a rel urns in favour of Ministers. The majority in favour of Mr. Rolfe was 21 ; but if we separate 'Falmouth fro:n Penryn, we find the votes as follows : Penryn. Falmouth. Rolfe... Tullamoore We here see that Lord Tullamore's votes were nearly all from the freemen of that old sink of corruption nryn ; and that while Mr. Rolfe had 251 votes of the healthy constituency of Falmouth, Lord Ttillamore had only 82 there. This sample nr.y serve for all Tory returns. They are strong only in places where bribery and intimidation can be brought into operation. We understand that there was a good deal of rioting at Penryn. The worthy freemen of that place consider upright Tn_n in the light of traitors—as men who would d ‘:;rive them of a market for their votes ; and, in con sequence, many of those who voted for Mr. Rolfe were very much injured by the mob. Several individuals wl:o wished to-vote for Mr. Rolfe were deterred by tl,Jir brutality from going to the poll. The mob were quite infuriated at the prospect of loosing what the deem their birthright, through the conscientious sciu. pLs of some of their townsmen. But this is what TAries admire. We may now appeal to the result o th numerous elections which have taken place as the best answer to the boast of Sir R. Peel, that he had th„:. country with him. " We may be weak here," said the Right Honourable Ba ro..et, " but this I tell you again respectfully, but with a firm conviction of its truth, that there is a public opinion which 3;.lsts independent of majorities—which is not controlled by vetes—which it is essentially necessary to possess, in addition to nere majorities in this House. I never felt more convinced of anything than I do of this truth, that the public opinion will not sanction,—it will with its submission, but it will not with its approbation sanction,—your efforts, even if they are suc cessful, to throw impediments in the way of the useful measures of Government." The Right Hon. Baronet must now be satisfied that he laboured under a most grieVous delusion when he give utterance to these sentiments. Ministers have been successful, or will be successful, in Totnes, Taunton, New-)ort, Sandwich, Berwick-upon-Tweed, Nottingham, Manchester, Penryn and Falmouth, Stirling, Haddington, Cambridge, Edinburgh, Clack minnan and Kinross, Dundee and Elgin. An oppo noct w ill be start in Leith, but without any prospect of success. The only places in whicn th.tre is any doubt aal to the result are the West Riding of Yorkshire and South Devon. With respect to the West Riding, we are confident of Lord er.::41 , •!.-gu. ,-- • - m o lleth's success. In South Devon the contest , w ill !it sev re, no doubt, .but there also the Tories will be defeated. They have selected that district, conceiving themselves, to be there peculiarly favoured by circumstances, and they have no doubt forced the Reform ers throughout the country to exert themselves to prevent Lord John from being borne down by cor ruption. Still, even in South Devon the Tories will be defeated. However, leaving South Devon for the present, can there be a stronger proof than these re elections in so many different places, most of them pos sessing numerous independent constituencies, that the Tories have public opinion against them, and.that the conduct of Ministers has been acceptable to the na tion ? This is the way to test the value of the ad dresses to Sir Robert Peel. These addresses do not speak the sentiments of the nation. , We point to the returns as the best answer to them.—Morn. Chronicle. At the conclusion of the Essex election yesterday Mr. ELWES was found to have outstripped his Whig competitor by 1,031 votes. We think we may venture to date from this epoch the extinction of Whiggery and Radicalism as active or influential principles in the county of Essex. As a set-off, however, to this triumphant conclusion of the Essex contest, we are bound to record that the Solicitor-General, Mr. Rolfe, is returned for the united boroughs of Falmouth and Penryn, by a majority of twenty-two. Falmouth, one of these united boroughs, is, our readers will recollect, one of the chief stations for the Government packets, and Government must naturally enjoy considerable in terest in the place. The Conservative candidate, it must be recollected also, never presented himself at the election, and if not a reluctant, was at least an inac tive candidate, while his competitor, with the influence of Whitehall in his hands, was neither absent nor in active.' These circumstances may probably account in art for the magnificent majority of twenty-two.— llornim,r Post. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-110USE. . Yesterday being the day being appointed for the exami nation of the bail to be offered by Murphy, who stands charged with having aided Foster to escape, knowing that that prisoner had committed forgery, Sir Claudius S. Hun ter attended with the Lord Mayor, for the purpose of as certaining the efficiency of the securities. After the lapse of a considerable time Murphy's attorney said that Mr. Thomas Adams, one of the Gentlemen who had promised to bail his client, had just refused to come forward and justify. The other bail was present, and per haps would be considered sufficient. The Lord MAYOR—No ; I certainly cannot consent to do anything of the kind. I have given the prisoner every opportunity of procuring bail consistently with my duty to the public and the parties prosecuting. He has had every fair chance, and, after long waiting, has not been able to obtain proper security. Murphy—My Lord, it is very easy to say I have had every chance, but what chance have 'I had ? I hav e been locked up, and laboured under every disadvantage. One of my bail stopped at the very door of this office, and said that he could not come forward on account of something ...at was said to his wife. Murphy's Attorney—The security of Mr. Kimber as one of the bail was refused by your Lordship because he was arrested on the spot, but there is no doubt of his re sponsibility. An eminent Counsel is so well satisfied of the case that he advises Mr. Kimber to defend. Mr. Peachey, solicitor for the prosecution, upon making inquiry, was dissatisfied with the bail alluded to. Sir C. S. HUNTER, as two securities did not appear, should take his leave. The LORD MAYOR then desired that the evidence against Murphy should be read over, and that other formalities should be gone through, preparatory to the committal of the prisoner. Busain, the policeman who apprehended Foster and Mur phy on board the American vessel off Belfast, added to his former deposition that, in the course of the conversation after the arrest, Murphy said, " Thank God, Sir Robert Peel has taken off the capital ; they can't bang us." Murphy—This is something new ; the witness never said anything of the kind before ; every examination produces something new. Busain repeated the above expression. The Captain told witness that they (Foster and Murphy) had offered him 1,0001. to take them off. Witness heard Murphy say that the Captain, after havinc , received 601., put out to sea, and then produced the bill describing him and Foster, upon which they gave the Captain two 100/. notes, and he pro mised to land them safe, but soon afterwards betrayed them. Murphy showed witness the cut in the waistband of his breeches from which he had taken the notes for 2001. Murphy—This is new evidence. Do you say that I showed you a cut in the waistband of my breeches ? Busain—You did, and I cautioned both of you to be careful of what you said, as it might be used against you. Murphy—You've examined all our trunks and clothes, and I ask you, "Did you find any single thing relating to the business ?" Busain—No doubt of it. I not only searched your clothes, but I ripped them open, and I found nothing. Murphy—Did we not readily give you up everything? Busain—Certainly you did. Mr. Peachy—Did Murphy say anything about destroying any property ? Busain—One of the men on board told me that when the Captain was ashore they destroyed a great many bank notes and documents. I asked Murphy whether that was the case, and he said, " So help me God, we did not destroy any notes. If we destroyed bank notes, why not destroy those we gave to you ?" After we left the ship, I again asked the same question, and received the same reply. Murphy said then, " So help me God, we gave you up all the pro perty we had except the 2001. we gave the Captain, for which he gave us an indemnity. That indemnity and two letters were all the documents we destroyed." Mr. Peachy then said that Murphy having had sufficient time to procure bail, and not having produced it, the only manner in which they could act was to commit the prisoner. The LORD MAYOR—Prisoner, it is now time for me to decide what course to pursue with respect to you. I have considered my part of this case dispassionately, and I am of opinion' that the evidence contains strong presumptive prool that you had a guilty knowledge of the guilt of Foster. I allude particularly to the evidence of the policeman, as has been just given. It is my duty to commit you for trial The prosecutor's solicitor is not satisfied with the bail you offer. Mr. Hobler—Why did you not say while the other Magistrate was present that you bad two persons to bail you ? While Sir C. Hunter was here you said not a word about having two sureties present. Murphy—l did not suppose I should have the honour of being before Sir C. Hunter. My bail have been here all the time, both Mr. Kimber and Mr. Love. We must have everything legal now, strictly legal. (In a very loud voice.) The LORD MAYOR—You shall, Sir. You seem to be rather excited. Murphy—l have good reason to be excited, I think. I consider myself to be very harshly treated, my Lord. The LORD MAYOR—You speak of Mr. Kimber, and of the injustice of refusing his bail. Why, when be came to bail you he was taken away by a Sheriff's officer. I could not think of admitting such a security as that, particularly as he was objected to by the prosecutor's solicitor. I owe it to the public and the parties prosecuting to refuse those persons under the circumstances of the case. I shall com mit you for trial. Murphy—Then I hope the public will be made ac quainted with this determination of the Chief Magistrate of London. The LORD MAYOR—You may make yourself quite easy upon that subject. I dare say they'll hear all about it. - The depositions were then signed, and the prisoner was fully committed for trial. QUEEN SQUARE. Yesterday James Tyler, a young man about nineteen years of age, was brought up in custody of a policeman, charged with a burglary at No. 11, Holywell-street, Strand. The Magistrates committed him for trial. THE LION'S STRENGTH.—" Of this noble animal two varieties (the yellow and the brown or black) exist in South Africa, both retreating before the progress of European colonization ; the dark coloured is the strongest and fiercest ; their strength is prodigious ; well authenticated accounts prove that a lion will carry off an ox or a horse with as nearly great ease as a fox would do a goose. A young lion has been known to carry a good sized horse a mile from the spot where he killed it, and an instance occurred in the Sneuwberg where a lion carried off a two year old heifer, and when his track 01 spoor was followed by the hunters for five hours on horseback, throughout the whole distance the carcase only once .or twice was discovered to have touched the ground. Sparr man says he saw a lion at the Cape take a heifer in bis mouth, and though the legs trailed on the ground, he carried it off as a cat would a rat, and leaped a broad dike without the least difficulty. Like all the feline tribe the lion lies in wait for his prey, crouching among grass and reeds near pools and fountains, or in narrow ravines ; he will spring from nine to twelve yards at a bound, and can repeat these springs for a short time. Denied, however, the fleetness of the hound or wolf, the lion, by a few quick and amazing bounds, can seize even the tall giraffe or cameleopard, by springing on the haunches of the latter. Instances have been known of the giraffe thus carrying a lion twenty miles before sinking under the attacks of its destroyer."—Martin's History of the British Colonies, Vol. IV. Africa. THE SUN. LONDON, SATURDAY, MAY 2, 1835, PRICES OF CANALS DOCK STOCKS, ASStTRANCE COMPANIES; &c. &c. LONDON, FRIDAY; MAY I. Number Dividend Peee of per CANALS. per Shares. Annum. Paid. Share 1,760 'ai per cent. Ashton and Oldham ...Average 071. 16s. sh. 157 1,482 61. Ashby-le-Zouch 1,260 Basingstoke Brecknock Ind Abergavent A t 1,0, , 5 Si. 150. sh. 63 I,ooolsh. 121. Ms. Birmingham, i share 171 . 10s. 241 yveragellllol...shh: 6551 4,031 Ditto and Liverpool Junct....ll 01. eh. all pd 6;10 ...... ... Bridgewater and Taunton -.IOU sh. all pd 64 4'o 11. Chelmer and Blackwater ....103. sh. 102 500 42/. Coventry 'oo/. sh. 4,546 Croydon Average 311.25. 10d. sit. 21 2,06.4 31. 10s. Dudley 600 6/. Derby 100/. sh. 120 3,5751 231 43'. Erewash 'OIL sh. 515 1,297 2.8/. Forth and Clyde Average 4001. Vs. sh. 60C 11,50 1 121. Grand Junction 101. sh. 238 2,8491 Grand Union 100/. sh. 23 1,521 Grand Surrey 120,0411. 41. per cent. Dit'o (optional) Loan lOO/. 73 3,1V6 Grand Western 600 13/. 12s. ed. 011awrganshire, Average cost 172/. 13s. 4d. 2S O 1,910 Gloucester and Berkley 10 , 4. sh. 15 74 101. Grantham .•..... l5O/. sh. 202 6,213 11. lOs 'Judders& Id Average 071. 6.5.60. sh. 33 100 Kensington 13) sh all pd. 10 ' 25,328 11. Kennet and Avon, Average 391.83. 100. sh. 211 2,8971 •M. Leeds and Liverpool 1014. sh. 533 515 121. Leicester l4Ol eh. 149 907 41. Leicester and Nort hsmp•on... A ver 631. 10s. SO 550 5/. per cent. Liskeard and Looe Union 251. sh. all pd 25 7,) 1441. Loughborough Average 142/. 17s. sh. 1,600 2,409 Sl. Monmnuthshire lOW. sh. 180 250 91. Melton Mowbray lOW sh. 190 500 251. Mersey and Irwell 1001. sh. 56) 3,000 217 151. Neath 1001. sh. . 100 pd. 10 1,786 321. Oxford lO4l. sh. 61558 522 21. Oakham l3Ol. sh. 2,400 4/. Peak Forest Average about 781. sh. 104 21,418 14s. Regent's (or London) Aver. 311. 16s. ed. sh. 161 5,669 5/. per cent. l)ochdale Average 85/. sh. 12340 500 e/. Shropshire 1251 sh. 1 RIO pe rcent . set Coal 150/ sh. 163 45,0001. 61 pe D So itto mer Lock Fund Stock 12 /. 10s., sh. 12; 700 36/. Stafford and Worcester l 4, 1. sh. 690 500 111. Shrewsbury 125/ sh. 2401 30t) St. Stourbridge 3,647 11. 10s. Stratford.on-Av :n ...Average 79/. 9s. ed. sh. 381 533 13/. Swansea 100/. sit. 205 3,762 IL Severn and Wye and Railway ...Av 35L sh. 19 ?MO Ish. 32/. IN. Trent and Mersey, 1 share 1001. sh. 625 8,149 ..... ... Thames and Medway... Aver. 19 1 . ss. 841. sh. 2 1,000 101.1 154 Warwick and Birmingham 100/. sh. 280 1,000j4h. . 121. Watwick and Napton lOO/. sh. 218 0,003 31. 10a. Worcester and Birmingham... Av. 781.5 i. sh S7l 2..000 As. Wilts and Bea/. .. Average 1(1. 17s. Bd. sh. 5 800 61 Wyrley and Essington • 12.11. sh 73 isyt ~...... Wisbeach lO5l. sh. 45 903 11. Wey and Arun llOl. sh. 21 ROLLS COURT. His Honour the MASTER of the ROLLS, after going through his petition and short cause paper, gave judgment in the following cause : THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. THE IRONMONGERS' COMPANY. His HONOUR had looked through the proceedings in this case, and he certainly found it difficult to frame any order at all consistent with the orders already made. The testator in his will most anxiously kept separate the pur poses of his three gifts. He appropriated the first to a pur pose that could not be carried into effect, itnd the others to purposes entirely distinct from the first—so entirely dis tinct that the only title necessary to a participation in the first was to be a British subject, whilst the second was en tirely of a local nature, beinc , a gift to certain charity schools in London and its suburbs. The third gift was still more limited, for it was merely a remuneration to the Ironmongers' Company for any trouble they might sustain in managing the trusts created by the will. This last gift being of no particular sum, but being in proportion to the whole residue of the testator's pro perty, the remuneration to the Company of course kept pace with the increase of that fund. By the de cree the reference, after inquiring whether the whole or what part of the income could be applied to the uses of the will, and, if none could be, then the Master was to consider and approve of a scheme for its proper ap plication, and to consider whether any application could be made without the assistance of Parliament. From the terms of this reference it was clear that the whole matter was open before the Master ; but, instead of applying him self to the first branch of the inquiry, the Master approved of a scheme, appropriating the first moiety to the same purposes as the other two-fourths, and he did this contrary to the express terms of the will, which directed that the first gift should never be applied to any other purpose than that specified in the will. He (the Master of the Rolls) mentioned this not because he could make any order upon it, but because it diminished any regret he might otherwise feel in sending the matter back to the Master ; and if the Master's report were now regularly before him, he certainly should feel hesitation in confirming it, at least without some further investigation. The only thing that he could at pre sent do was to adopt the language of the order in appeal and direct the Master to review his report, and in review _ _ ing his report so far as the appropriation of the surplus income, to have regard to the other charitable bequests of the testator. WESTMINSTER--APRIL 24 AND 28. MOODY V. GEARY—CEAPY V. MOODY. His Honour the MASTER of the ROLLS gave judgment in these causes, which came before the Court upon bill and cross bill, and were heard before his Honour on 13th, 14th, and lath of January last, when Mr. Bickersteth and Mr. Wray ap peared as Counsel for Mr. Thos. Moody ; and Mr. Pemberton, Mr. Spence, and Mr. Younge appeared as Counsel for Mrs. Louisa Geary. The original bill was filed on the 7th May, 1832, by Thomas Moodie against Louisa Geary, and prayed that the partner ship might be declared to be dissolved, that the partnership accounts might be taken from the last settlement, and that the defendant might be decreed to be the purchaser of the part nership stock at Milford, and the plaintiff the purchaser of the partnership stock at Stratford Subcastle, and that all proper directions might be given for ascertaining the value of the part nership stock and effects at Milford and Stratford respectively, for winding up the concern, for selling the partnership stock and effects, and for the appointment of a receiver and manager until the partnership affairs should be finally settled ; and for this pur pose the plaintiff, Thomas Moodie, relied upon the settlement of the partnership accounts with the defendant, and the deed of release she had executed on 27th of January 1830, in Lon don, and the accounts she had signed on 9th October, 1830, and again on Bth October, 1831. The. cross bill was filed on the sth of September, 1832, by Louisa Geary against Thomas Moodie, and it prayed that the partnership might be declared to be dissolved, and that the deed of release of the 27th of January, 1830, and the settlements of the partnership and private agency accounts signed by the plaintiff at that time, might be declared to be fraudulent and void, or that plaintiff might be at liberty to surcharge and 'falsify the accounts ; that accounts might be taken of the partnership transactions during the lifetime of John Phelps Geary, with Thomas Moody, and of the private or agency accounts of Thomas Moody with John P. Geary, and with his widow the plaintiff, and that the partnership might be charged with a fair occupation rent of the lands and premises at Milford from 24th June 1817, when defendant's notice of dissolution expired, or from 14th De cember, 1823, the time of the death of J. P. Geary, and that Thomas Moody might pay a fair rent for certain parts of the premises at Stratford, occupied by him ; that the pre mises at Stratford might be declared to be partnership pro perty, and sold together with the partnership stock there. The case made by the cross bill was, that on the 10th of October 1799, Thomas Moody and the plaintiff's late husband, J. P. Geary, agreed to enter into partnership together. The stock then belonging to John Phelps Geary was valued at 1,5501. 15s. 6d., and that Moody some time afterwards paid 251. 7s. 9d., and gave the said John Phelps Geary a promis sory note for 7501., half of the remaining 1,5001., but no arti cles of partnership were executed till the 25th of June 1810. On the 25th of June in that year, articles of partnership were executed, reciting that Geary and Moody were equally entitled to the stock in trade ; that Geary was entitled to the lands and premises at Milford ; and that Geary and Moody were jointly entitled to the premises at Stratford, where the business was also carried on, under a lease granted by Lord Camelford to the said J. P. Geary. Inventory of the stock and the debts due to the trade had been made, amounting to 4,4231. 13s. 7d., over and above all the debts then due from the partnership ; that they had agreed to continue in partnership, and that the capital and stock and profits should be equally divided between them—they a g reed to continue the partnership for twenty one years, and to divide the profits equally between them ; one-half f the 4,4231. 13s. 7A-d. should belong to Geary, and the other half to Moody. The lease of the premises at Strat ford was to be renewed in Moody's name, but for the benefit of the partnership, as part of the joint stock ; that Geary should let to the partnership the lands and premises at Milford for 741. 9s. 6d. ; that the accounts should be settled on the 24th of June in every year ; and that the parties, at the expiration, or sooner determination of the partnership, or within thirty days, should join in settling the accounts ; and that Geary should accept and take all the stock in trade, except the lease and stock at Stratford, according to the last valuation ; that Moody should take the stock at Stratford, and that Geary should pay to Moody so much money as, with the stock at Stratford, would make up Moody's share of the joint stock, money, and effects, according to the last valuation ; at the end of twelve or eighteen months, each party to be at liberty to give notice of dissolution at the end of the first seven or four teen years of the partnership term of twenty-one years. There was a similar provision as to Moody's taking the lease and premises at Stratford, in the event of the death of Geary during the continuance of the partnership. The bill then alleges that a notice of dissolution was given by Moody to Geary, on the 17th of June 1816, to dissolve the partnership on the 25th of June 1817, but explained to be only for the purpose of some new arrangements ; and the bill alleges that no definite arrangement was come to in the life time of J. P. Geary, but that the parties continued to carry on the business till the death of J. P. Geary, which took place on the 14th of December 1823, and that Geary by his will, made the plaintiff, his widow, his residuary legatee, and that she alone duly proved the will, and obtained probate thereof. The bill then alleges that the plaintiff was Ignorant of the articles of partnership of 25th June 1810, but that the business continued to be carried on. In October 1824, she signed the partnership accounts, and also the part nership stock-book for 1824, without examination, and that she, in the same way, signed the accounts in 1825, 1826, and 1827. In September 1829, and again in January 1830, the plaintiff employed Mr. Hayward as her solicitor, to investigate the accounts for 1828 and .1829 at Salisbury, which led to a quarrel between Mr. Hayward and Mr. Moody, in conse quence of which Mr. Moody came to London with Mr. Hod ding, his solicitor, on 20th January 1830, in order to procure a settlement of the accounts with Mrs. Geary personally, and applied to her for that purpose ; that she (as Mr. Hayward her solicitor was at Salisbury) consulted Mr. Lowless as her solicitor, by recommendation of her brother-in law and Mr. Cholmondeley ; that the accounts were, as the bill alleges, im perfectly and partially examined by them, and that on the 27th of January, 1830, Mr. Moody applied to her to sign the accounts up to 24th June, 1828, and to 24th June, 1829, which she did, and that a deed of release was thereupon pre pared and executed, which recited the aforesaid settlement of accounts, and also the settlement of accounts of Moody's agency, a balance of 1001. was found to be due to Moody. The bill alleges that on 9th October, 1830, and on Bth October, 1831, Moody produced other partnership accounts of those years, which the plaintiff also signed. It then proceeds to state the grounds upon which she proceeded to open the accounts, and for this purpose it alleges that the plaintiff has discovered that the accounts so signed by her are false and fraudulent, and contain many errors both as to debits and credits, and that the whole of the 7 5 0/. continued to be due ; that Moodie never brought any capital into the bu siness ; and that the lands 'and. premises at Milford had been let to the partnership at an inadequate rent, and that a full occupation rent ought to be paid to her from 25th June, 1817, or from Geary's death on 14th December, 1823 ; that part of the lands was let, which during the partnership was placed to the partnership account, and that from 1817 it ought to be passed to the separate account of the plaintiff, and that -the defendant ought to pay rent for the premises he occupied at Stratford ; and that the lease of the premises at Stratford be longed to the partnership. The bill then after charging that the annual accounts of the partnership, and the agency trans actions were not annually settled and signed by Geary in his lifetime, and by the plaintiff since h's death, charges, that Moody had not duly accounted, and that the accounts of the partnership and of the agency, were not annually or regularly, or duly stated and settled, and signed by and between Geary and Moody; for that the said accounts were frequently for many years in arrear, and as evidence thereof, charges that Moody, in the letter of 25th Aug., 1818, to Wm. Cooper, the solicitor of Geary, in relation to the partnership and the affairs thereof, expressly states, " we have now three years settlement to make," and charges that, in point of fact, the said accounts remained unsettled for many years prior to, and down to the death of Geary, and that a balance was due to Geary on the accounts. It then charges that if such accounts were settled and signed, the same were erroneous. It then charges that the plaintiff signed the account upon the faith of Moody's representations, and without any examination, and that the deed of release of January 27, 1830, was obtained by misrepresentation, and that the recital in the deed of release that the accounts of the part- nership and of tho- agency were at stated periods adjusted, settled, and signed by Geary in his lifetime, were false, and that the agency or private accounts from Jutie 1823, to June 1829, were not examined by Mr. Lowless, because the plaintiff infortned him that Mr. Hayward had examined and was satis fied with them, which was not the fact, as she had since disco- vered Mr. Hayward had not examined or approved of the ac counts as Moody represented, at the time of the execution of deed of release on January 27, 1830, when he produced Mr. Hayward's pencil memorandum, and stated that the vouchers in support of the payments had been examined and given up at S•ilisbury to Mr. Hayward for her. There are then several charges as to the 7501. and the Stratford lease, and particu larly as to a certain laild called . Marsh Furlong, which had been added to the prelnises at Stratford in 1813, which had increased the expences of the partnership, and,• therefore, if Moody had the land, he ought to pay. I have thus particu larly examined the case made by the cross-bill, because I am of opinion that the form of this bill excludes a portion of the case attempted to be made by the plaintiff. The bill seeks to set aside the deed of release of Jan. 27, 1830, and the transaction and settlement of accounts on Jan. 27, 1830, as fraudulent and void, and to surcharge and falsify .he accounts. Now as to the latter object a decree for that purpose can only be obtained where the bill alleges particular errors, and the evidence proves such errors to exist in the settled accounts. The bill undoubtedly alleges the note for 7501. is still due, but this was the very point in discussion pre vious to the settlement on the 27th January, 1830, and the evidence proves that Mr. Lowless and Mr. Cholmondeley having been requested by the plaintiff, Mrs. Geary, to look into the accounts for the purpose of seeing whether it was still due, they examined the accounts, and were satisfied and acquiesced that it was accounted for. There is indeed evidence to prove that this sum was at one time due, and was so down to 1813, but that proves but little, for from the nature of the transaction, the 7501. might be discharged without any actual payment of money ; because it was the price that Moody was to pay for one half of the stock on 10th October, 1799, then valued at 1,5501. 15s. 6d. Now as soon as Moody realized in the business 1,5001., by leaving his share of the profits of the business, or by other means, the 7501. would be no longer due ; and such was the case stated and acquiesced in ; and the articles of partnership of 24th June, 1810, re cite that Moody was then entitled to one half of the stock, and that stock then amounted to 4,4231. 13s. 7 d. ; so that there must have been some capital paid in, or some accumula _ _ tion of profit on Moody's account. How, then, can the Court open the account upon the ground that this 7501. is still due ? Mrs. Geary, therefore, has made no case to open the accounts. I will now consider the other ground taken—namely, the at tempt to set aside the deed of release of the 27th January, 1830, and settlement of accounts on its execution on the ground of fraud. The particular facts in support of this part of the case, are these : that certain annual accounts, purport ing in the books to have been signed by Geary in his life time, were not signed by him, and that the signatures of Geary's name to 111D - se tmruql accounts are so many forgeries. Now had this been so alleged in the bill, and had the bill i Ton^, en to state that such forgeries of the name of Geary had been used by Moody, for the purpose of inducing Mrs. Geary to settle and sign the accounts of 27th January, 1830, and she did so upon the faith of such forged signatures being genuine signatures of her husband Geary, and all this had been proved, a very strong case would have been established for setting aside the deed of release and the settlement• of accounts of the 27th of Jan. 1830 ; but no such case (it is most extraordinary) is charged in the bill, or put in issue. Mrs. Geary must be the very best judge whether these apparent signatures of Geary to these annual accounts were her husband's or were forged signatures ; but the Bill only alleges that the accounts were not annually or duly settled and signed by Geary in his life time, for that they were frequently and for many years in arrear, and conti nued unsettled down to Geary's death; if these signatures had been irregularly obtained, and it had been material, this should have been put in issue ; but the issue attempted to be proved is that these forged signatures to these annual accounts were used as instruments of fraud to procure the execution of the deed of release by her, and the settlement of the accounts on the 27th January, 1830 ; but to support evidence on that point there is no sufficient allegation in the Bill. It was impossible for the defendant in the cross bill to come prepared to meet such a case. He has examined a witness or two to prove the hand-writing of Geary in the usual way, where no issue is raised ; but he has never been called upon to prove that these alleged forged signatures to the annual accounts are the ge nuine signatures of Geary, in answer to those allegations of the plaintiff, that these signatures " John Phelps Geary" are forgeries. I am, therefore, of opinion that I cannot take into consideration Mrs. Geary's evidence, to shew that these signa tures of John P. Geary are forgeries, for the purpose for which it is charged in the cross bill. There is therefore no allegation to impeach the settlement of the accogios on 27th January, 1830, upon that ground, and if that belriettiimpeached it is im material whether -these particular recounts were signed or not by Geary ; because, although the Bill alleges that the recitals in the release were false, which stated that all the annual ac counts were from time to time settled, adjusted, and signed by Geary, it does not allege as to what accounts such recitals were false, and the settlement of accounts on 27th January, 1830, proceed upon the faith of such false recited facts ; and there were other subsequent settlements of accounts on Bth October, 1830, and again on 9th October, 1831, and if all the accounts previously were not impeached, these, and the settlements of accounts after Mr. Geary's death, could not be impeached on the ground of fraud. It is material now to consider the evidence which took place at the time the deed of release, of 27th January, 1830, was executed. It appears from the evidence, that Mr. Hayward, Mrs. Geary's solicitor in September, 1829, investigated, at Salisbury, the accounts for her ; and again, at Salisbury, in January, 1830, a quarrel took place between him and Mr. Moody, which caused the in vestigation to be incomplete by him at Salisbury, and led to Mr. Moody, with Mr. Hodding his solicitor, going to Lon don, and the meeting which afterwards took place in London, on he 22d January, 1830, with Mrs. Geary on Moody's ar rival, when she consulted her brother-in-law Mr. Cholmon deley, and by his advice employed Mr. Lowless as her solici tor, who met Hodding on 22d January, 1830, without waiting for Mr. Hayward's return. Mr. Hayward says, on his arrival on the 23d of January,. 1830, he had two or three interviews afterwards with Mr. Lowless, for the purpose of explaining to him the result of his incomplete investigation of the ac counts, his inquiries, and se. on. Mi. Lowless, before the accounts were signed, and the dee!, of release executed on the 27th of January, 1830, had the benefit of Mr. Hay ward's suggestions. Mr. nodding, Mr. Moody's solicitor, states, that on their arrival, having applied, on 21st January, 1830, to Mrs. Geary as to the settlement of the accounts, he declined to proceed with her, unless she appointed some soli citor to meet him, and Mr. Lowless was appointed. Mr. Nodding on the part of Mr. Moody, and Mr. Cholmondeley and Mr. Lowless on the part of Mrs. Geary, met him on the 22d of January, 1830, and the books A and B were exa mined, and such other books and papers as they thought necessary. Mr. - Lowless states the 7501., thQ rent of the cottages, and the salary of Mr. Moody, and the amount of the debts due to the firm, were the objects of their examination ; they were satisfied, and acquiesced that the 7501. was accounted for, and that Mr. Hayward was mistaken, and that Mr. Moody gave up the point as to the rent of the cottage, and in the result 1841. appearing to be due to Moody he agreed to take 1001., giving up the 841. on account of the rent. Mr. Cholmondeley gives much the same account of the transaction, and says, that on the 26th of January, 1830, he and Mr. Lowless having satisfied them selves and acquiesced that the 7501. was accounted for, but Mrs. Geary and Mr. Hayward having told Mr. Lowless that they were not satisfied, and were of a contrary opinion, no settle ment then took place. On the next morning Mrs. Geary took the opinion of Mr. Cholmondeley, and Mr. Lowless agreed to settle the accounts, and executed the deed of release, which were accordingly settled and signed. All this by Mrs Geary and her brother. in-law was acquiesced in for a considerable time ; for, as Mr. Lowless states, that on the 9th of October, 1830, and on the Bth of October, 1831, he and Mr. Cholmon deley met Mr. Moody to settle the accounts up to that time, and he did examine them, and Mrs. Geary thereupon signed them. The result as to the partnership accounts is, that after as much of the examination of the accounts as Mrs. Geary thought necessary, she was satisfied of and acquiesed in their accuracy, and they were accordingly settled and signed, and the deed of release of Jan. 27, 1830, executed under the advice of her brother-in-law and Mr. Lowless, her solicitor. That the case attempted to set aside the deed of release, the transac tion and settlement, fails 'for the reasons I have before stated. It is now necessary to advert to the account of Mr. Moody's agency with John Phelps Geary, which was settled at the same time, but with respect to which the facts are different. As to the agency or private account; the bill alleges that this agency account was never examined by Mr. Lowless, in consequence of Mrs. Geary having informed him that Mr. Hayward had examined and was satisfied with the accounts, and which she then believed to be true. She had since discovered that such accounts had not then been examined or approved by Mr. Hayward. By way of amendment, the bill states that Mr. Moody produced these agency accounts, with the memoran dum in pencil of Mr. Hayward, purporting that these accounts up to 24th June, 1829, had - been settled and arranged, and the vouchers for the receipts and payments had been given up to the plaintiff Mrs Geary, and which Moody represented to be the fact ; but that the plaintiff had discovered, and the fact was, that the memorandum was written in pencil by Mr. Hay ward merely as the form of a memorandum to be copied in ink at the foot of the agency account on settling and signing the same, but that such accounts never were so examined and finally settled, and the vouchers never were given up. Such is the statement, and Mr. -Hayward is examined, who proves it. Mrs. Geary then alleges, that in January, 1830, when Mr. Hayward was advising her, and the communication took place with her solicitor Mr. Lowless, relative to the accounts, that he believed these accounts to have been examined and found to be correct by Mr. Hayward, as his memorandum in pencil imports. It is apparent that these agency accounts have been examined by Mrs. Geary's signing the same on the 9th of October, 1830. Mr. Lowless says that these accounts were not examined by him, because from this pencil memoran dum he supposed that they had been duly examined' and ap proved by Mr. Hayward ; but Mr. Lowless, by his written me morandum in ink,appears to have examined these agency ac counts, and compared them with the vouchers on the 9th of October, 1830. Taking, therefore, Mr. Hayward's and Mr. Hodding's statements together, it comes only to this, that ow ing to a pencil memorandum of one of Mrs. Geary's solicitors, another of her solicitors, Mr. Lowless, on the 27th January, 1830, did not examine these agency accounts, but these agency accounts were afterwards, on the 9th of October, 1830, signed by her—the deed of release being executed by her previously, —not by any proc ur ement of Mr. Moody ; and in these agency accounts, so signed, no error is proved. I am, therefore, of opinion, that Mrs. Geary's case, as to this, also fails, and these accounts must be taken on the footing of the last settlement. There were some points in the case as to Marsh Furlong at Stratford. lam of opinion that it must be considered as part DOCKS. 9 ` 600 & 1 3n c. Commerc i a l CI 1,065i5h. • ' 198,66711. 3,238,3101. 2/. ss. p. ct. London .Stock 5:l Ditto Bonds lO3 1,330,0001. 51. per et. 'West India 2,..0.1 31. 6s. 4d. Bristol Average 14:4 1. s. sti. 71-1„31 61,3241: 51. per cent. Ditto Notes, various amounts ll6 1,352,752 3 p• - r cent. St. Katharine Stock '7O 500,000 4i per cent. Ditto Bonds lOl4 200,000 4 per cent. Ditto Bonds for 10 ye ars 10.4 Shoreham Harbour 2571 BRIDGES 3,600 IL Hammersmith 5Ol. sh. 223 7,231 Southwark, Old Av. 631. 2s. 6d. sh. 2 1,700 U. 15s. Ditto, New, of 73 per cent. 5Ol. sh. 15 5,000 ... ... Waterloo lOOl sh . 5,000 . 1/. .... Ditto, Old Annuities of Si. 6Ol pd 5,000 19s. 3d. Ditto , New D i t to of 71 40/. pd 2 2 60,0001. 51. per cent. Ditto Bonds 118 6,000 1/. Vauxhall Average '7O/. 10s. 3d. sh. 22 ASSURANCE COMPANIES. 2,000 3/ lOs Albion 5001. sh. 501. pd 765 50,000 p rg i r d T 1 Alliance, British & Foreign 1001. sh. 10/. pd 111 50,000 6 per cent. Ditto, Marine 100/. sh. 5/. pd 53 24,000 10s. per sh. Atlas 1,200 ish. 41. Birmingham Fire 25 0 1. sh. 551. pd 105 20,000 41. per cent. British Fire 2501. sh. 501. pd 40 12,000 61. per cent. British Commercial 501. sh. Si. pd. 6g 5,000 51. per cent. Clerical, Medical, &c. Life...lool. sh. 2/ lOs pd 31 4,000 21 10s County ........... „.... ........ „.. 1001. sh. 101. pd 42 6,000 ss. Eagle 501. sh. 51.. pd 53 ,••v• r Per cent} Economic Life lOOO l. sh. 2501. pd 315 `'''' t 5 and 30/ bs. 2,271 51/. per cent. European L ife OO/. sh. all pd 22 50,000 2s. Ditto, New 2Ol. sh. 2/. pd If 1,000,0001. 71. per ct. Globe Stock 1553 20,000 11. Guardian 1001. sh. 201. pd• gai fFire 5 p ct.l ,_, .50/. sh. 51. pd 4/ '""" /Life 8 p ct. .5 " o P e (1 2,400 5/. 7s. rid. Imperial Fire 5001 sh. 50/. pd 117 7,540 9s. Imperial L ife 100/. sh. 101. pd pi Si. per cent. Indemnity Marine 1.01. sh. 8/. pd 12 1,0'20 31. Kest Fire .501. sh. all pd 85 10, , '00 16s. Law Life 1002 sh. 10/, pd 26 3,900 1/. London, Fire 211 sh. 12/. 103. pd 233 31 000 11: London, Ship 25/. sh. LI. 10s. pd 233 30,000 .U. per cent. Palladium Life 50/. sh. 2/. pd 21 55 250,00) is. fid. Protector Fire 2O/. sh. 21. pd 1/ lOs 2,500 1/, Provident Life lOO2 sh. 10/. pd 193 100,000 ss. Rock Life 20/. sh. 91. pd 52 Ins 639,2201. Si. per cent. Royal Exchange Stock... 1%; Sun 2lO pd I±22s6d 50,000 4 per cent. United King d o m Life 2/. JOINT STOCK BANKS. 5,000 . ..... ... Australasia 4O/. sh. 2(31. pd 10,00 e 10 per cent. Bank of Birmingham 5Ol. sh. 10/. pd 123 10,000 10 per cent. Birmingham Bank 5Ol. sh. 5/. pd 12 18,000 2 per cent. London and Westminster r.. 100/ sh. 151. pd 13 30 dis. 3,000 25,000 6 per cent. Liverpool 1001. sh. 10/. 1 d 15 20,000 7 per cent. Provincial Bank of I reland 100/. sh. 25/ pd 4113 10,000 National Provincial Eng lOOl. sh. 251. prl 25 10,000 10 per cent. Gloucestershire 50/ sh. Si. pd 11 6,000 ..... „„ Hampshire 501. sh. 5/. pd Sa9 GAS LIGHT AND COKE COMPANIES. 2,500 11 12s Bath 5,000 Cl. per cent. British 4Ol. sh. 161. pd 23 5.000 I.sla,liellselsl Ditto rrovincial 201. sh. IN. pd 24 844 51 10s Birmingham 5O/. sh. IN) 4,250 21 Os Bristol 2O . sh. • zO.l 1,500 Brighton 2Ol. sh. 14 I'so . Ditto, New ........ ............ 20/. sh IS/. pd 12 2,471 5 per cent. Brighton General 201 sh. all pd 'l9 4,000 3/. Continental Cansolidated lOO/. 5132 pd 76 1,000 10/. City of Londonall pd 1923 1,000 6!. 100/. sh. 60/. pd 120 4,000 4/. Ditto, New Equitable . 'W. p 4 32 6,000 61. per cent. East London 5/. sh. 4/. pd 43 50/. sh 10,000 5/. per cent. Imperia l SOO 51. per cent. Isle of l'hanet 25/. sh. 201. pd 213 2.350 6/. per cent. Independent 3O/. sh. all pd 50 9,000 4 1 . per cent. Pheenix 501 sh. 39/. pd 25 1,000 4 1 . per cent. RatelifF 100/ s h. 60/. pd 4,000 South Metropolitan SI. sh. 13/ pd 143 8,200 5/. per cent. United General 5Ol. sh. 441. pd 40 240 5/. per cent. Warwick 501. sh. 50 lop 115 s Wakefield 2,000 31. Westminster Chartered ......' ... ... . 5Ol. sh. 46 d 6,000 I2s. Ditto , Ne w 5O/. ;h. 10/. pd 9ex 800 Yarmouth WATER WORKS. 4,800 Birmingham 251. sh. 25/. pd 27 4,43.1 5/. East London lOOl sh. 134 4,500 2/ IN (Jr nd Junction ....Average 411 13e. 4. sh. 58 2,000 2/. Kent OO/. sh. 48a47 3qB 10/. Liverpool ilootle 2201. sh. 300 1,500 2/ IN New River London Bridge W a t e r Annuities 58 6,488 1/. Manchester an d Salford 7 1,000 4 per cent. South London 100/. 0). 8, 00 3/. West Middlesex ....Average 63/. 12s. 9d. sh. '79 1,360 1/ 144 York Building Co. Lessee Prop 100/. sh. 34 IRON RAILWAYS. ...... .. Cheltenham 1001. sh. Clarence lOOl. h. 1001. pd Forest of Dean 5O/. pd Grand Junction 1001. sh. 201. pi 2,010 Hartlepool 104. sh. 1001. p‘,l 2,100 Leeds and Selby lOO sh. 1,500 Leicester and Swannington ....51'l. sh all pd 5,100 9 per cent. Liverpool and Manchester...loo/. sh. 10 5/ 0/.d p Ditto Quarter Shares .. p d 20,000 25,000 London and Birmingham ...100/. sh. .Pd 2,500 Preston an d Wi g an 800 350 2,000 2,500 MINES. Albion Copper 5/. sh. 21. pd Allen 151. sh. 101. 103. pd ~.... Anglo Mexican, iss. 5/. pm ...1001. sh. all d Ditto Subscription 25/. p p d 80l •nos .. . ... ........ . . .......... --MU sh all pd Brazilian Imp. iss. 5/. pm....... 35/. sh. 20/. pd Macaubas ttz Cocses United..:.2 s /. sh. 20/. pd Ditto St. John Del Rey 20/. sh. 7y. pd it,ooo Cats Branca... l4/. ad Candonga . Bolivar Copper Company . . .... 201. sh. 201 pd Ditto Scrip.... 11. 10s. British Copper Si. sh. Si. pd Columbian, is.. 5/. pm. 551 sh. 5441. pd English 121 ICs. pd it. General Mining Association...2o/ sh. 15/. pd Mexican Company IW/ sh 4941. pd Polberou Consols IN. sh. Si. pd Real del Monte, Unregistered Ditto Loan Notes l5O/. pd United Mexican, iss. 2 pm .... 0/. sh. all pd Ditto Subscription 2l. pd Ditto New Scrip 5/ pd Union Gold, iss. 21. 55.pm....22i/. sh. 44/. pd West Cork 5Ol. sh. 25/. pd LITERARY INSTITUTIONS. 1,000 L,ndon with Bronze Ticket 75 gs. sh. 1,500 700 King's College 1001. pd MISCELLANEOUS. 10,000 10s. Australian Agricultural....lo' 1. sh. 29/. ph 1,030 1/. Auction Ma r t .50/. sh. 60'1) British American Land Company Cl. pd 40,000 61 per cent. Canada Company - 1.0"/. sh. 201. pd 200,000 51. per cent. Upper Canada Loan City Bonds, 4 per cent 15,000 11. per cent. General Steam Navigation ...I'l. sh. 131. pd I'l per cent. Hudson's Bay Stock 2,000 1/. London Com. Sale Rooms Av. 75/. sh. 2,754 4/. per eAit. Reversionary Interest.Soc...loo/ sh. ioet. pd 2,633 4/. per cent. Ditto New Intl. sh. 4.'1. pd 4,000 10,000 Van Diemen's Land 1001. sh. 161. pd ...1.. ... Ds. 8,000 4,000 10,000 2,000 10,000 31.. s. 6,0 0 9,000 I 0,0041 . 20,000 0,000 .. 1,500 ... ‘2,g' 0 10,000 20,000 ...- 11,500 5,000 ...... 30,000 5,(00 42 . 2 10 pm LIST OF SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES, _ _ _ APRIL 1, 1835. BANKS. 1,500,00 0 1. 51. p. ct. Bank of Scotland ......531. 6s. 5.1. sh. all pd 200 p. 2,000,000 i. 51 p. et Royal of Scotland 100/. sh. all pd 1701. 500.0001. 6p. et. British Linen Company 100/. sh. 11 pd 240 , . 3,000,000/. 61. p. ct. Commercial 5OOl. sh. 1001 pd 170/. 5,000,0001. 5 p. et. National lOO/. sh. 101. pd 14/ 54 2,00 ..0001. 241. p. ct. Glasgow Union 250/. sh. 501. pd 60/. 4,000,0001. 6p. et. Western of Scotland 2001. ah 301. pd 321. - - INSURANCE COMPANIES. 'so,ooosh. sp. ct. Sc.ottish Union 201. sh. 1/. pd 11 7,500 15 p. ct. Hercules 100 L sh. 10/. pd 11/. 100,000 sp. ct. Insurance Co. of Scotland....lol. sh. all pd 7110 s 50,000 6p. ct. North British ..200L sh. 101. pd 15/. 1,000 sp. ct. Caledonian Fite 100/. sh. 101. pd 131. 5,000 6p. ct. Edinburgh I.ife 1001. sh. 10/. pd 131. 100,000 4p. ct. West of Scotland lOl. pd 111. MISCELLANEOGs, 4,810 Edin. and Glas Un. Cana1...501. sh. all pd 8/10s Ditto Allocated 9'l. ,li. all pd 601. 5,400 5 per cent. Etlinb. Joint Stock Water.... 251. sh. all pd 33/. Carron Iron Company 2501. sh. all pd 4501. 2,0005 h. 15 per cent. Shotts Iron Founctery... 5O/. sh. 3' l l. pd 181. 10,000 3 per cent. Edinburgh and Leith G1a55...201. sh. all pd 71. 4,500 10 per cent. Edinburgh Coal Gds 25/ . sh . a ll pd 6.1/. 4,450 10 per cent. Glasgow Gas 251 . sh. all pd 5.1. 730 6 per cent. Leith Coal Gas 201. sh. all pd 83/. 1,200 5 per cent. Edinburgh and Htikeith Bailway...so/. sh. 781. 3,000 5 per cent. Equitable Loan Company...2sl. sh. 10/. pd 101. COURSE OF EXCH) Amsterdam C.F. 12 5 Ditto, at sight l2 2% Rotterdam 2U. 12 5 Antwerp l2 5 Hamburg M.B. 1313:. Altona l3 13% Paris, 3 days' sight 25 80 Ditto 2 Us. 25 90 Bordeaux 25 95 F'ankfort on Maine, Ex. M 152 Petersburgh, ruble '3 Us 10 1 ,6 Berlin Vienna, effective 9 2 M. 10 Trieste ditto :. 10 iia - drid 37 Cadiz 374 Bilboa Barcelona Seville 37 Gibraltar 4B NOE, YESTERDAY. Leghorn l7►U Genoa 25 ‘,5 . Venice Vaples Palermo per oz. 1205% Lisbon s'7 Oporto 5751 Rio Janeiro • Bahia 26% Buenos Ayres Dublin, 21 days' sight Cork l% 47% PRICE OF BULLION, PER OZ. Portugal Gold, coin £0 0 0 Foreign Gold, in ban 3 17 9 New Doubloons New Dollars .9li Silvers bars, standard 0 4 11% 1‘ of the Stratford property, to which it was added. The Part' nership having been carried on after the expiration of the s i r; ticks, and after the death of Mr. Geary, with M rs. Geary' wheat succeeded to all Mr. Gear's interests in the properrY , an k t no it must be considered as carried on in the term s and provisi o tt of the articles, unless any particular provision took Pl ace ; Upon the whole, therefore, as both parties were e ntitled re file bills for the settlement of the partnership accounts, must be a• decree in both causes for taking the partnership counts upon the footing of the last settlement, and for ing the dissolution of the partnership, and so much of 7_ Geary's cross bill as seeks to set aside the settlernent o f tse accounts, and the deed of release of the 27th of Jal lui r," .1830, and to surcharge and falsify the accounts, must be 1- missed with costs. Mr. Wiwi—The evidence taken in both causes to be en ' tered as read. The MASTER of the ROLLS.—That is always left to tbe. Master,. whatever part of the suit the evidence applies to left to the Master. c lis- Mr. PEMBERTON—One decree will be in both causes; d i s .. miss so much of Mrs. Geary's bill with costs as seeks to turb, and surcharge, and falsify the accounts. „,. Mr. BICKERSTETH—In the case of " Moody V. Gea r ;w. don't know how it will stand ; the largest share of the ig deuce had relation to the points which were raised in the c'sl oy ' suit of " Geary v. Moody," and if it stands thus, dismis s n ie e so much of the bill of " Geary v. Moody," as relates to ti points, it will omit altogether the evidence which was tak en the other suit. Mr. PEMBEETON—I don't know what the effect will it is necessary that must be guarded against. h tbs The MASTER of the Rou,s—lt is singular enn li g - : greater part of the evidence was taken in a suit to whinh it gsy g had no application. It is regular to read it. Mr. Wray D o the defendant set up a case in her answer, but there was,r bill to which that evidence would apply—the evidence ail plicable to the original bill, but it was taken in the cross bfloss Mr. PEMBERTON.—Dismiss Mrs. Geary's cross bili,so it seeks to set aside the deed of release and the se rt d th counts, and to surcharge and falsify the accounts tle is including in those costs the evidence which has bee n TA'7 O " the support of the same in the other suit. Then, Sir, •as „ er iod period of the dissolution of the partnership ; from w hat r is the dissolution to be considered as taking place ? The MASTER of the Rous.—l should rather say Ire° expiration of the notices. Mr. PEMBERTON.—UnIess your Honour does somethingf; finite with respect to this, it is possible that it maY lend tow''_ ther expense. The parties have not the best feeling et, each other, and it may turn out that the notices differ. Job, haps your Honour will now give some direction upon the ject, fixing it to a particular day. bert ° Mr. BICKERSTETH.—I quite agree with Mr. Peln a r if? that it will be necessary to fix the time to a day. If nour has not the pleadings before you, perhaps ynn i „„der* good enough to look to them, and name the time. stand that the notices do differ. OW The MASTER of the Rou.s.—l will look into the P.e upon that pu:r.t. " nto the On Tuesday his Monour stated that he had loo ke d pleadings in this case, and he was of opinion that the riot ship should be decreed to be dissolved on the 24th ... 1 85% 1832, according to the written notice of the 25th A P' given by Mrs. Geary to Moody. BAIL COURT. THE KING v. TEALE. Mr. C. PHILLIPS, in this rather extraordina r ctbl o moved for a certiorari and habeas corpus to bring e p de posi' Court the body of the defendant, as well as certain f t he tions against him taken before three magistrates ° t hat county of Gloucester. The object of the motion 05 the to the defendant, now in custody, should be brought U p cir h° Court, and admitted to bail. The following wer e cumstances of the case, as mentioned in the a ffidavi t • 10. The prisoner, Mr. Teale, is a tradesman, residing ost 376 in the Strand, and his business principally clof selling straw to straw-bonnet makers. On the Su w rit April, in the course of travelling for his business be", at Cheltenham, where he put up at an inn, being s ob • to the town. Afterwards he proceeded, in the g o o, orders, to the shop of the prosecutrix, a Mrs. Af t# married woman, and residing with her husband. „pi!: having laid before her samples of his merchandise, J. of chased goods from him to the amount of la 6s. 6 ,70 ' bargain being concluded, the husband of prns,e c At be ° e• least so we understood the affidavit) accomPanr" helf d fendant to his inn, and there, over a cup of ale, the e gain was discussed at greater length. Subsequ e lorrisS are quoting the substance of the affidavit), Mr•,.., rlr pressed the prisoner or defendant to accompa • nY to his (Harrison's) house to sup with him e n , F A , Harrison, when he promised to give defendan,t.chri of oxchango for the whole amount of the r o e, I Defendant accompanied Mr. Harrison home, an," fpoc istl i• with him and prosecutrix (his wife). During a e ,: t tliSi stay all the parties played at cards, and three tiro""°sri: wine were drank at defendant's expense. Some lie ° r , two o'clock defendant weis lighted to his room. I , int° . dressed, went to bed, and slept. About four o'cleettigO' morning, defendant was awoke by Harrison ent el ? , l °s room with a light. The latter said to defendant' nl er„ not come to look for you but am seeking fo r rbed j else." Harrison then'proceeded to search under tPe a,W which defendant slept. Mrs. Harrison shortly aft er , i Teale's bed-room, and then both her husband an' ,1 11 ' 6 4 exclaimed to Teale, " D—n you, if you don't giv e ortl, bill of exchange, we will kill you."--(It m ust be 41 that Teale, during the evening, got the bill of eseh'i ts i .. ,ll 121.65. 6d., the amount of the goods said to be I A tr i6 from him by Mrs. Harrison.) Both husband and vi d ier 4 proceeded to beat prisoner with two brass ea°, dr„. which they had in their hands. Prisoner , ei se ;";P l ,, himself, gave the alarm, calling out " Police," s l3 `;:peti i ; der." The police arrived, when Harrison thr ee give defendant in charge to them, whereupon he f ,` T 0 01 ; fendant) said, that at that late hour he would Pse c u r Pi to the station-house for protection. The defe li A , e or.J accordingly taken there, where he remained till P' re fec r :ii o'clock in the morning. There being no charge P e lO i fy against him, he was then discharged, having Era, lodged in the inspector's hands the bill of es e' better safety. A biP teo On the next day the prisoner Teale appease-,i ocefjeo Magistrate. He entered into his own recor, Doty appear at the Gloucester Sessions, which were -t° rfoiy on the 15th of April. It was now, at Chelterooo the prisoner was for the first time accused of tee b er , A o person of prosecutrix, and by the three Magi st n tis" alluded to he was committed to prison, to take PI" 41 the ensuing Assizes. Mr. Justice WILLIAMS—At what time was it 5 ril' that the rape had been committed ? f o r ot i Mr. C. PHILLIPS—On the night of the 3 bro' after the parties had been playing at cards. Counsel here recapitulated the chief facts of t he n osi ti ,t l ' concluded by saying that the defendant m ost ; r e t ot swore that he was completely innocent of the pt besides, that he had not made the slightest at t i e t fosil could be construed into the shadow of an itif e ; i o o 10 )r Mrs. Harrison. In addition to this, the p ole e re stated their belief that Mr. and Mrs. Harrison 're cated on the night, or rather morning, in question. Mr. Justice WILLIAMS granted the writs of B IR TH S. of ° lo l 3' On the 29th ult., Mrs. Woodward of Surrey-sce' tbe On the 25th ult., at Crocknacrieve, near Enniskinen' f, V Colonel T. Stewart, of the Madras army, of a son. /V. On the 29th inst., at Stone, Kent, the lady of the berden, of a daughter, still-born. ./- { ; r Al ej° MARRIED. On the 28th ult., at St. Mary-le-Strand, by the,„,P,ael. f,O, d'Arblay, and. afterwards by the rites of the 11 0- o il terEC h soq u r o. n:c of Martin thef, e. ,) 9 u t n hi it Elm-lodge,. . ia o yttw. Salop,o= ai Haywood, d Es gt .431 to . os t, A cLp l ba Caroline, i ni z eod z c i i r , nne to e; s: Mary Isaac Armstrong, Esq., King-street, Snow-hill. On the 30th ult., at St. Pancras New Church , ~ ~....,.../ daughter of Brookes Hinton, Esq., of Kensington, to4' Amos, eldest son ,of the late Thoma s Sterrop Amos , : ' obr 4 General of the Colony of New South Wales. -'-- - - l'^ ------- f S ti DIED. ° te r ° 4 On the 29th ult., Jane Freeling, youngest dime ha V Stanley, Esq., Lincoln's Inn-fields. • -0 I. j'r why, On the 27th ult., at Thorpe-place, Surrey, the .. e ~f r Bennett, in his 67th year. . w ife b fel, C r On the 24th ult., at Wombwell-hall, Kent, Ra C o f Harman, Esq., aged 71. rc . ber, a Pef' On the 29th ult., in his 67th year, Mr. W. ATi Thames-street. D . , e lvi r * orfi , On the 29th ult., Mrs. Tanner, relict of the late of Maidstone, Kent. gr. Co' On the 28th ult., at Pimlico, in his 56th Ye ar ' (Co' Perryman, late of Windsor, Berks. ,• ffq 0 11, p 1 011' On the 21st ult., at Lesieux, in France, Mary , Ar ,r Creagh, C. 8., late Aide-de-Camp to his Majesty vvilli°o.o r,,,i On the 29th ult. at Newmarket, aged 50, Mr. ,„t, it boo eV the celebrated Jockey. His earthly race is over, icing ,00 formed with peculiar skill, and social and uncompr °l° tbe I iv principle. He has left a widow and nine children, ofe only a week old. •t of t be 0' On the 26th ult., aged 83, Mrs. Osborne, relic al b Isaac Osborne, of Spondon, Derbyshire. as SOF . 1 On the 22d ult, aged 86, Anne, relict of Thor° 64 many years one tithe Aldermen of Newark. r, CaP t ' r , 0 64 On the 19th December last, at Bombay, of fe! e 3 ,sth Y e oi l Lloyd, of the 7th Regiment Bombay N. 1., in his t he son of the late Edmund Lloyd, of Harle-street,' „„ r giao a " 0 1 ' On the 17th ult., at Romalkirk, York - shire, """ tet O o el 41' of the Rev. George Price, in her 29 th year. f ikfr. S C On the 29th ult., Elizabeth Williams , niece 0 _ s treet' po , hams, of Wood-green, near Hornsey , a nd Berl orl well, aged 23. son ° f lie ' l/f On the 30th ult., Ferdinand, aged 2 y ears, itte f or r , nuel, of Bury-street. 'a, daa V On the Ist inst., aged 14 months, Helen 'llan . v. 0 Edward S. Meyer, of Bedford-street, Covent-garr, ss2l., On the 30th ult., at Homerton, Thomas par 4 . ~, ~ecl Wood-street, aged 71. Fortis , a t' On the 30th ult., at Brighton , M. MarY __.---4 London Printed and Published by MURD° S trand' in t 136 o l f l2 m , i St ddl ra e n se d x ,.at The Sun Office, No. 112, 4 I 1 , 4i11 c4n, ~a ~~ ~. ~~