The Sun. — London, England, 1835-11-06 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. We must once more return to a painful subject ; one which we would have willingly avoided mention ing again, did we hear of any symptoms of repent ance in the perpetrators of what we cannot but consi der an act of most iniquitous and gratuitous injustice ; and had not the suffering individuals it concerns every claim to European sympathy, and to that public pro tection and vindication which the present shackled French press seems not to dare to afford them. We allude to the arrest of fifteen Polish refugees (the number is since, as we are told, greatly increased) in the Rue Batignoles, at Paris ; among whom are three Members of the late Polish Diet, Zwierkowski, Hlusz niewicz, and Zaleski, and M. Nabielak, one of those who so heroically began the Polish Revolution of No vember the 29th, by the attack on the Belvedere Palace. !The warrant issued against them contains two charges, fine of conspiracy against the security of the State it Complot contre la surea de l'Etat) ; the other of in fringement of the law against Associations (Contraven tion contre la loi sur les Associations.) The particulars oaf their case, communicated to us by an unquestion txble authority, amply prove both these accusations tto be unfounded. The Code of Instruction Crimi melte of France does not allow one accused of high ftreason to be set free upon bail. And upon this pre text the Procureur-General, M. Martin du Nord, .declined to comply with several applications made on -the behalf of their countrymen by the Polish Sena -tor, Palatine Ostrowski, and General Dwernicki. _However, after a horrible imprisonment of three -weeks, during which the accused have been kept in a :filthy dungeon teeming with vermin, and upon a regi men worse than that allotted to convicted murderers, :it was resolved on Wednesday, October the 28th, that . - the prisoners should be set free, upon finding bail to -the amount of five hundred francs each T. This cir cumstance is sufficient proof that the charge of high treason, notwithstanding the greatest endeavours to the -contrary, could not be substantiated. With respect to the infringement of the law against Associations the case stands thus :—The Polish Society, of which the ac cused were members, sent, at the time when the law in question was under discussion in the French Chamber, to the then Minister of the Interior, Count d'Argout, la letter, stating the objects and purposes of the Society, and containing a list of its members, with a notifica tion that, as their purposes were merely national, and ..as, besides, by article 41 of their statutes, every con nection with a foreign society was absolutely forbidden, they presumed they might continue their meetings. This letter was not answered, but M. Gisquet, the Prefect of Police, himself told them, that provided they did not meddle with French affairs, they were at liberty -to meet and deliberate upon their own cause in any way they pleased. Now, had the French Government considered this Society as unlawful or dangerous, they would—fully aware as they were of its existence and objects—have dissolved it immediately. Such dissolu tion, however, not only did not take place, but about two months since the Journal des Debats, the organ of the Ministry, inserted a protest of this very So ciety against the loan of 150 millions of florins con tracted by Russia in the name of Poland. What other consequence is to be drawn from these facts, but that the French Government themselves did not, till the recent arrival of Count Pahlen, consider the law against Associations applicable to the Polish society in question, or if they did consider it so applicable, blushed to put it in force. The Monarchy of the Bar ricades has a curious method of keeping its pledge to guarantee the nationality of Poland. The Northern Autocrat, in a fit of affectionate emotion towards his father-in-law, presented him with fifty Circassians. The Citizen King bath displayed his affection for the Autocrat by an offering more analagous by, in honour of his AmbasSador's arrival, consigning to the loath .some dungeons of St. Pelagic men whose only crime is the having lived anti fought for the liberty of them selves and mankind. How long is civilized- Europe to be scandalized by these courtesies of despotism ?- -.L 1 ,/lorning Chronicle. It is difficult to say which ought to be admired :most in the conduct of Russia towards her European znd Asiatic neighbours—the insolence with which she treats them—the robberies and depredations which she is incessantly committing upon them—or the shameless ..effrontery with which she has the impudence, in the .:name of peace, of civilization, or of religion, to defend ttem. Of the two last portions of her conduct it is unnecessary to present any illustrations. 'Where ver her eagles have winged their flight, there have they engraven them in characters of blood, which an ocean of repentant beneficence would be insufficient to wipe out—wherever her Ambassadors have been sent, there have they left the most ample mementoes of the faith less character of the Court by which they were accredited—of the hollowness of its professions— of the insincerity of its promises—of its intriguing and deceitful spirit. The King bf the Barricades bids fair, indeed, to prove an overmatch for the race of the Northern Autocrats in all those qualities which debase the man, while they disgrace the people over -whom he is permitted to have rule and authority ; but -presuming that his reign is not calculated to be of that lengthened duration which‘ would enable him to inspire the Court of France with the same spirit and the same motives by which he is himself actuated, and that he is therefore out of the question, we may say that of all the Courts of Europe, the most base, the most corrupt in tendency, the most flagitious in principle, and the most insolent in tone and manner, is that which is also the most barbarous, and the most (easily confined within its own unenviable bounds—the Court of Russia. It . was but the other day, that in .addition to the - grossest breach of faith that was ever committed by any one people against another—we mean the subjugation of Poland and the incorporation of it with the Russian dominions—she attempted by a secret treaty to seal the entrances to the Black Sea against all ships of war, except those which she might give leave to the Porte to allow to pass—and now flushed with the impunity attending the disgraceful proceeding, she has the insolence to insult the Plenipotentiary of -.the only power of which, single-handed, she has any mason to entertain fear 1 The Czar insults the King o f ,England in the person of his Ambassador, Lord Durham, and his minions have the insolence to attempt a defence of their conduct, as being according to esta blished usage I The particulars of this affair have been already before our readers, and we need not, therefore, repeat them. Lord Durham resented the insult as an English nobleman, the representative not .only of the only constitutional, but of the most power fu 1. Sovereign in Europe, ought to have resented it ; but no satisfactory apology, or an explanation, has yet been given, and we put it to Lord Pal merstco whether he is to permit the matter to rest here p.—whether the insult is to be pocketed, and the foreign policy of England to be in future guided by the smiles a cid growls of the Northern Bear ? If such is to be the cm se, the country ought to know it at once, in order that it may be prepared for what must naturally follow--the subjugation of all our interests, commercial, civil, and political, to the nod and beck of a power which in six months a man of Lord Chat ham's decision and energy would have reduced to the most humiliating condition—but we hope better things. Lord Palmerston cannot—will not—permit such auda cious. insolence to pass unpunished. Explanations must not only be given, but an ample apology made, and the Autocrat informed in deed, if necessary, as well as in words, .that his conduct is estimated at its real value, and that, hosvever he may trample on others, there are those'who will not permit him to touch one hair of their heads with impunity.—Morning Advertiser. Reflecting on the atrocious conduct of " the King of the Barricades," in ridding himself, on the one hand, of all those liberal friends, whose opinions of state policy being now out of joint with his own, could not but prove troublesome and unwelcome monitors, and, on the other, in persecuting that Press from whose - -.manly resistance to the despotic decrees of Charles X. :and his Ministers, spiting the power which he has so eossly abused,—it is impossible not to think at the onne time of the infamous pretences which he has set ,in justification of the course which he has pursued to,w in ar ,ds the latter, and the noble, though indirect.man ne. " which its conduct and its utility were vindicated b y . Cauchois Lemaire, in his late defence of him self. The pretence set up for the enactment of the gagg i . 'uf laws, undo: which the Press of France now drags on a lingering existence, was the assassin attempt of Fieschi—just as if the Press of France had, on the one hand, been holding forth on the necessity of assas sinating tyrants, or, on the other hand, been in treaty or league with Fieschi, or any other scoundrel, to in duce him to make the attempt ! No attempt, how ever, was made, either public or private, to bring proof in support of any fact of any criminatory nature against the Press or its conduct ; though, if there had been any, there cannot exist the slightest doubt that it would not only have received all due publicity, but the very shadow of it, however limited, been magnified into a most extensive, deeply-laid, and bloody conspiracy. There was not, however, the mere shade of shadow of truth in the vague and intangible charge that was in sinuated with such base and cowardly malignity. " There was," as has been justly observed by a noble writer in the Edinburgh Review, " a diabolical plot to assassinate the King, and there were newspapers existing at the same time. This, positively, and no thing more, is the connexion between the Press and the plot—the pretext, the flimsy pretext, for chaining the Press with chains of iron, abolishing Trzatby Jury, extinguishing all journals published by poor men ; and, in fact, placing the discussion of all sub jects, except perhaps mathematics and antiquities, upon a more slippery and intolerable footing than they were in the time of an open, avowed, and candid tyrant." The pretence, however, was sufficient in the eyes of a Phillippising and unreformed Chamber, to induce it to pass laws in direct violation of the Charter, but which cannot at the same time fail in extending, ma turing, and firmly establishing the political rights, not only of the people of France, but of all Europe. The progress," adds the noble writer, in the Edin burgh Review, " which republican principles have made in England during the last twelve months, has been remarked by all accurate observers of the signs of the times ; and not a foreigner who hears our conver sations now, and had left us for a year or two, is in sensible of the change. We verily believe that an Englishman resorting to France next year, will be struck still more with the like progress, should the mew laws be continued in force"—and who can doubt it ? Even the worm turns in helpless revenge against the foot that heedlessly puts an end to its ex istence; and are millions of rational beings when trampled to the dust in all that men hold most dear— in all that wounds their pride and comes home to their bosoms and business—to exhibit a lesser sense of the injury done to them ? But to return to M. Cauchois Lemaire. How nobly did he vindicate himself against the charges specifically brought against him, and the prejudices entertained against his profession by the Wakleys and Roebucks of France ? With what dig nity did he not brush away the former, as unworthy of his notice—and with what noble candour dissipate the other as a filthy exhalation of pride and ignorance His speech ought to be printed in letters of gold, and we again reprint it—all that we can do in the columns of a newspaper—in order that it may sink more deeply into the minds of our readers—be remembered by them as it ought to be remembered—and produce those re gards towards the traitor King which he so richly merits at the hands and hearts of all just and upright persons. " It is not without some surprise," said he, " not without wonder indeed, that I appear at this bar. It is so unusual to me. For eight years now have the Crown lawyers spared me ; and during five of these eight, which have kept both men and the press so busy, I have remained ever at that post where personal responsibility is no fiction, without having been once cited or prosecuted for a political offence. After this long truce With a most quarrelsome parquet (body of Crown lawyers), there comes a menace of fine and imprisonment, which strangely refreshes and brings back my memory to a time when I too paid my share of that tribute, which the King's Treasury and his gaoler raised from the liberties of the press. Years but light in number separate me from that time, but this interval is an age in events, of which one was a revolution. At its completion I had hoped that my task of contributing to the emancipation of the press, by my sufferings and my petits, was over. I may add, that the very personage who thus, by a strange con vulsion of circumstances, has become my accuser, him self thought, after the revolution, that the day of peril was over for the public writer: I preserve in my ar chives, as one of my most precious autographs, toge ther with other letters from friends since risen to be Ministers, one in which the present Advocate-General announced himself as the historian of my humble efforts for the liberty of the press. The little works which accompanied the note spoke in favour of this liberty, and of principles which the Hon. Gentleman now thinks it more prudent to keep at a distance. Instead of your former eulogium, M. Advocate-General, I have now to endure your lessons, elegant mayhap in the form, but direly rigid, especially if the Jury should think fit, as the Advocate-General seeks, to transform his advice into reality by sending me to prison. The words of my accuser fill me indeed with anxiety. What ! have I been all at once guilty of what he pleases to call an attentat, less direly punished under the old than the present system of law ? Have I lost sight of my long habits of prudence, and thus come as an old man under the fangs of the law, which I had ever the prudence to avoid and escape when young? Have I been so silly as to confound licence with liberty, and insurrection with opposition ? The time, you must own, is ill choen for such a change. But no—l have not changed. Since 1815 I have remained ever in the service of the self-same principles. It is not I who have changed ; and it is wonderful to think that . I, who professed, and pleaded, and developed these prin ciples with so much impunity under the restoration, should now be called up for what can be no crime, save in the requisitions of a Crown Lawyer. If I have not changed, something else mnst have done so. The to lerance of Government must have beconie singularly narrow, and its force militant, its instruments singularly and increasingly oppressive. If my journal has not made one step towards revolutionary principles, and it certainly has not, then the Government which has pro secuted it must have retrograded farther back than the restoration. One need not make use of merely their eyes and good faith to see this. The Government lays violent hands on the Constitutional guarantee of the press, and, of course, seizes us for defending them, as, nevertheless, the writers of a conciliatory journal. If I read you some articles of that journal, you would be amazed at the stupid/zeal which inflames the guar dians of the reigning system to prevent a translation from the English, though side by side with other arti cles proving our moderation." M. Cauchois Lemaire here explained that he way about to quit the place of editor. " I may abdicate the functions of editor," he said, " but not that of a journalist. The word may hurt, and may prejudice over-loyal ears against him who bears it, but I am proud of the title. I have fulfilled its mission with delight and love, whether at liberty, or in prison, or in exile, whether the press be free or enslaved. Yes, after a revolution, which opened to me other paths of ambition, I contented my self with the humble profession of a journalist. It is to me a sacred mission, the more sacred for the perils which surround it. Like all other human things, this profession has its ills, its advantages, its false brethren, and corrupt members. Where is there a trade in which rogues do not thrive ? where an army without some cowards I or where, with every respect for the Court, .is there a band of judges and lawyers in which a false and venal conscience does not lurk ? Yet still it is a noble profession, the instrument cf ci vilization, and the protector of all that is most precious in humanity. Yes, Gentlemen of the Jury, I avow myself a journalist, a journalist of opposition, not one from spite, envy, or ambition—one who has refused the gratifications of one, and the delusive offers of the other. The Jury, however, may answer me by adopt ing the opinion of the Advocate-General, and may de cide, as in 1828, that this Court is but the ante-cham ber to a dungeon. Be it so. Yet it is no less strange that I should suffer under Louis Philippe, King of France, the compliment of the penalty incurred pre viously, for having saluted, somewhat prematurely, Louis Philippe, the Duke of Orleans, as future King. I dreamed then of what I find realised now ; but, alas ! how, and in what spirit realised ? Surely my exclamation of disappointment is no crime. Yet, if ye should think it so, Gentlemen of the Jury—if ye should be determined to send me, along with so many brethren of the Press, to prison, I shall not demur, but merely ask one fovour : this is—that I may be shut up in the same old:cell, which I may:thus occupy twice under two reigns, which I had expected to find somewhat different from each other. There:l" may at least meditate with advantage upon what is called poli tical justice, and upon revolutions which turn singu larly into re-actions."—Morning Advertiser. VICE CHANCERY-THURSDAY. TREZEVANT V. FRAZER. The hearing of Counsel was resumed this morning, after which, the VICE CHANCELLOR delivered the following judgment : I quite agree with one observation of Mr. Jacob, that this case is important, not so much by reason of the pro perty involved in it, as of the principle upon which it is to be decided.. As I understand the facts; it appears that in 1826, shortly after the death of Mr. Farquhar, there be ing a dispute between his next of .kin, in consequence of some advances he had made to Mr. Mortimer, which might be held to be gifts, an agreement was made on the 4th of December, 1826, by which it was arranged that as to the sum of 20,000/. admitted to be a loan to Mr. Mortimer, payment of it should be made by certain in stalments ; and as to a sum of 18,0001., not in dispute, part of the purchase-money of an estate, that it also should be made, and the title to the estate cleared in a certain manner, at their joint expense. Now, according to the re presentation of the petition, this agreement was made in the most deliberate manner, and there was no misunder standing as to its terms. But, it is alleged, as one of the considerations for entering into it, that Mr. G. Frazer stated to Mr. Mortimer, in the presence of certain persons, that if he could consent to pay the 20,0001., no demand should ever be made on him by any of the next of kin for an account of any other advances he had received. Of course that was in dependent of the purchase money. Now, it appears that the document in question 'was drawn up without any such clause as corresponded to this verbal declaration. No tice, however, was taken of it at the time, but it was stated that the verbal agreement was to be as binding as if it had been introduced. It is then represented that, in conse quence of that statement, Mr. Mortimer was induced to sign the agreement without having any professional advice. That is the statement which goes to represent that Mr. Mortimer was induced to sign the paper in the form in which it was tendered to him, upon the assurance of Mr. Frazer that the verbal stipulation was binding, and that he had not proper professional advice to put him on his guard not to sign a paper which did not contain all the terms. Now, that representation is utterly inconsistent with the notion that the paper itself was fraudulent and void, and also inconsistent with the fact that all the repre sentations of Mr. Frazer, by which Mr. Mortimer was induced to sign, were false and fraudulent. Then the bill was filed, not by Mr. Frazer, but by Mr. Trezevant, who was certainly no party to the agreement. An ordinary answer was put in, and a decree was taken in the common form, unless it be considered a deviation that that it di rected an inquiry as to the property outstanding. In pursu ance of the decree a state of facts was carried into the Mas ter's office, and a charge, by means of which a very large sum, exceeding the 20,0001., the subject of the loan, and the remaining part of the purchase money, was claimed from Mr. Mortimer, and he put in examination to interro gatories in support of the charge. That was in June, 1831. By that examination it appeared that Mr. Mor timer, who must of necessity, if the representations in the petition were true, have known all the circumstances attend ing the signing of the instrument in 1826, represents a state of circumstances regarding the 20,000/. which he consi dered as a gift and not as a loan. He says that, shortly after the death of the intestate, in July, 1826, Mr. Frazer prevailed on him, when in a weak state of health, labouring under atrophy, to sign sonic instrument whereby he was made to admit the 20,0001. to have been advanced as a loan and not as a gift. And he goes on to say, that in order to induce him to sign it, Mr. Frazer represented that Mr. Colvin stated he was informed by the intestate it was only a loan, and he also represented that it was in his power to ruin the examinant respecting the 20,000/. and other advances if he would not give up that sum, but that there should be no further annoyance if he would give it up and sign the instrument, and he adds that he was then in a debilitated state of health ; but that he had since discovered that Colvin had never made the state ment attributed to him, and that all Frazer's statements were Elsa ; and he submits and insists that under the cir cumstances the instrument was fraudulent. It appears that when this examination was put in, an amended state of facts was also carried in, taking to pieces the allegations of Mr. Mortimer in the mode of pretence and charge in a bill, and so it remained till after the death of Mr. Mortimer. Now, if there was any good ground for making out the case now stated in the petition, it was competent for Mr. Mor timer then to have made it with as much probability of suc cess (not to pledge myself however to its success) as at any other time. At the same time, on hearing all the facts, I am inclined to think there is a considerable show of truth in support of the case represented in the petition. But it does appear to me as plain as a thing can be, supposing the case would ever be made available, it might have been made available then ; and if the case the defendant represented then were found to be such that the Master could not deal with it under the decree, that would have been the time for an application to have put in a more substantial and available shape the case made by the interrogatories. But it does appear to me that the very way in which the case is put in the interrogatories is destructive of the case represented in the petition, but cannot be true. The petition represents anything but surprise. It represents a most deliberate resolution, the document in the form in which it was executed relying on the honour of Mr. Frrzer for the execution of the parole agreement. It is true the examination does glance at the facts stated in the peti tion, but it represents a very different case. Now then, after the death of Mr. Mortimer, when the business has been be fore the Master, the result, in fact, being that he has decided on the agreement of 1826, and has rejected all other claims— now, in 1835, a petition is presented, praying liberty to substantiate a' new case contained in it. It does appear to me a more dangerous and mischievous thing to truth and justice could not be done than to allow a man, with his own personal knowledge of the facts, at one time to make a de liberate case on oath, and then to turn round and say that is not the whole case, or the true case, and another is the true case. The cases as to bills of review are not very ap plicable, except as they show the principle upon which the Court acts in the admission of new evidence. If a party cannot reasonably account for delay in disc Overing the evi dence, and show that the discovery is recent, the Court will not allow that new evidence to be brought. But the cases only go to show how relief is given when the party is himself ignorant of the circumstances which constitute his case ; but if he knew, or could reasonably know, what the evidence was, the Court will not assist him. Now that principle applies ten thousand times more strongly to a case where the party is depositary of the fact himself. It appears to me, therefore, that, independently of all other circum stances, this petition is not sustainable ; and, in the ge neral view I have taken of it, without adverting to the extreme inconvenience and mischief that would be intro duced if I were to allow ..such a case to stand as is asked, it is my opinion I am bound to dismiss this peti tion with costs. , KING'S BENCH-THURSDAY. THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1835. Mr. Mansell had better verify it, and then the articles should be filed. This was accordingly done. COMMON PLEAS.-THURSDAY. MiaMEN NNW LENTHOPE V. BRIANT. This was an action tried in June last before the Chief Justice at Guildhall. It was brought for the recovery of e sum of money. The plaintiff had certain leasehold pre mises for sale at Stoke Newington, which were advertised to be sold by public auction, and they were knocked down to the defendant at 400 guineas. He not perfecting his purchase, they were resold for 1971. and the plaintiff brought his action for the difference between that sum and the 400 guineas. The defence at the trial was that the defendant purchased the property at the request of the vendor ; that it could not be supposed that he required such premises, being an old man upwards of 70 years of age and a hair dresser ; the property in question consisting of a corn chandler's shop, and a bakehouse ; and, moreover, there were many puftrs in the room who had no intention of being bona fide purchasers. The defendant tendered in writing a paper, which stated that he was requested by Mr. Ross, the auctioneer, who is the son-in-law of the plaintiff, to purchase the premises, but not to go beyond the sum of 400 guineas. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff. Mr. Sergeant ACHERLEY to-day moved to set aside the verdict. The Court granted a rule nisi. GIBSON AND ANOTHER V. BOUTTS. This was an action brought by the plaintiffs, as as signees of a person of the name of Green, to recover from the defendant a sum of 1,5001., received by him from the bankrupt in a fraudulent preference. It was tried the sittings after last Term, when the defendant obtained a verdict. Mr. Sergeant BOMPAS to-day moved to set aside the verdict. The Court seemed rather reluctant to disturb the ver dict, but granted a rule nisi on payment of costs. While their Lordships were conferring, Mr. Sergeant BOMPAS begged to mention one fact, which was, that during the entire sittings the defendant was a Juryman on every cause except his own—(laughter)—and he doubted not that his fellow-Jurymen frequently talked over his case.—( Laughter.) The CHIEF JusTKE—Brother Bompas, that is only a presumption. Mr. Justice BOSANQUET-It is highly improper for any Juryman to mention his own case. EXCHEQUER COURT.-THURSDAY ADAMS V. BINGLEY. Mr. ERLE, on the part of the plaintiff, moved for a new trial in this case, which was tried at Guildhall, in the sit tings after last term, before the Lord Chief Baron, when a verdict was returned in favour of the defendant. It was to recover 3001., the value of a promissory note, dated the 10th of February, 1829, given by the defendant to Messrs. Wyatt and Thomson, and endorsed by them to the plaintiff. It was urged in defence, that on the day when the note became payable, Wyatt and Thompson bad obtained a fresh bill for the 3001. from the defendant instead of the note, and which bill was subsequently honoured. The Court, after hearing the Learned Counsel, who con tended that such verdict was improper, granted the rule. ADMIRALTY COURT-THURSDAY. THE ALBION. This was a case of salvage. The Albion, a vessel of 170 tons, bound for Constantinople and Odessa, with a valuable assorted cargo, sailed from London on the 27th of July last, and on the 29th it got aground on the Shingle Sand, about nine miles from Margate. Four loggers, the claim ants for salvage money in this case, the Britannia, the Dart, the Gilderoij, and Lark, soon came alongside, and an agree ment was entered into between them and the master of the Albion, that they should render her every assistance during that tide, for which service they were to receive 301., and in the event of their getting her off that tide, they should get 301. more. This, however, was not effected, and it being found necessary to relieve her of some part of her cargo, three other vessels were engaged to assist them in the .undertaking ; these were the Queen, the Liberty, and the British System, to which a tender had been made of 200 guineas, which was accepted. The question for the Court to decide was, whether the tender of 2001. that had been made to the four loggers that first boarded the Albion was sufficient. The value of the property was 19,764/. Dr. ADDAMS appeared for the salvors, and contended that the tender was wholly insufficient. The KING'S ADVOCATE, on behalf of the owners of the vessel, would not deny that these four loggers were entitled to some compensation ; but he would submit to the Court, that, in every point of view, 2001. was an amply sufficient tender. The COURT had no hesitation in declaring its opinion that 4001. would be by no means too large an amount of recompence, and it would even feel disposed to decree 5001., had the personal risk incurred been less trifling. The Court decreed 4001. and costs. INSOLVENT COURT-THURSDAY. The Court sat to-day for the disposal of motions, and, on its rising, adjourned to the 12th instant, the attendance of the four Learned Commissioners being required on Circuit at one time, in consequence of an order recently made for one of them to proceed into Wales, and determine cases, instead of the Justices. The Chief Commissioner will re turn from the Home Circuit, and continue the sittings until Christmas recess. IN THE MATTER OF JOHN OTTO KOOPS. This individual was heard in September, 1834, and was opposed on the ground of a concealment of property, and the Court intimated that he would receive a serious judg ment. He had remained in prison ever since without again coming up. Since then he had been indicted for perjury, alleged to have been committed in the proceedings in this Court, and was found guilty, the Court of King's Bench reserving certain points to be argued during the pre sent Term. The insolvent was entitled to considerable copyhold property at Poplar, which he alleged he had as signed over. An action had been brought by Mr. Brenan, the assignee appointed at the hearing, as executor of a Mr. Murphy, who had been in partnership with the insolvent as pawnbrokers. The property had been recovered by the assignee in an action of ejectment, and the insolvent applied to this Court to restrain the assignee from selling it. The application was refused, and Mr. Machin, of the firm of Machin, Debenham, and Storr, auctioneers, applied on affi davits, stating that the present was not a fit time for the sale, and that it would not realise its value by a considerable sum. The COURT granted a Rule Nisi, which came on for argument to-day. Mr. CHADWICKS JONES moved to make the Rule abso lute ; and Mr. Nicuou.s showed cause on the part of the assignee. Mr. JONES, in support of the Rule, urged the belief of the insolvent that Mr. Brenan was no creditor. The Learned Counsel said Mr. Brenan had described himself in his affidavit as being a gentleman, living in Gibraltar-row, Bethnal-green, whic was the neighbourhood where Bishop and Williams carried on their prosperous business of Burking.—(A. laugh.) Mr. Brenan, who was present, denied what the Learned Gentleman had stated. Mr. Commissioner HARRIS—What does it matter ? I may live next door to a felon ; and, sitting here, we are very near, no doubt, to felons in Surgeons' Hall.—(Loud laughter.) The COURT, at the conclusion of the argument, said there was not the slightest grounds for the motion. The assignee had a right to sell the property, and the Rule was dismissed with costs. POLICE IN TELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. Yesterday a great degree of curiosity was excited by the examination on a charge made by one party of Wesleyan Methodists against another ; the new light, we believe, against the old. The Justice-room and hall were crowded. with Methodists, many of whom manifested feelings of exul tation very unlike the meek and benignant spirit of Chri4 tianity which is often so beautifully preached by their Mi nisters. Mr. John Farrar, a young gentleman of very respectable connections, was charged by Mr. George Booth King, under the following circumstances : A constable, named Edwards, stated that a meeting took place on Wednesday evening in Mr. Alexander Fletcher's chapel, Moorfields. About 2,000 persons were present, and a great noise and confusion took place, and the Chair man o rered witness to take the defendant into custody, as one of the promoters who had encouraged persons around to make confusion. Witness saw the dfendant using such gesticulations as left no doubt that he was opposing the pro ceedings. A placard, calling the meeting, was handed in. It was headed " London Wesleyan Association," and stated that the meeting was called for the purpose of stating the circumstances which led to the formation of the Asso ciation, and the objects which it was intended to accom plish, and that it was founded upon a recognition of the following propositions :—" That as t h e H o l y S cr i ptures contain a sufficient rule of faith and practice, the Church of Christ ought not to be required to submit to any ecclesiastical human authority or rule, except as required in the Word of God. That no one class of officers in the Church has authority from the Bible to exer cise exclusive power in the government of the Church. That ecclesiastical history proves that all the corruption of Christianity originated in the depravation of the character of its Ministers, and that such depravation was consequent upon their advancement in wordly rank, and upon their having been allowed by degrees to assume to themselves the entire government of the Church. That the Wesleyan Itinerant Preachers have of late assumed to possess higher Ministerial prerogatives than are claimed by any other body of Protestant Christian Ministers ; asserting that they have Divine authority to make laws and enforce them by expel ling from church-fellowship whomsoever they may deter mine ought for refusing to obey them to be expelled, and now have publicly declared in the minutes of this year, 1835, their determination to maintain those assumed pre rogatives. That, therefore, it is requisite that all lawful and proper means be employed to obtain for the Wesleyan societies their just and Scriptural rights as to their go vernment and exemption from the unscriptural ministerial domination - now claimed over them. If this be not done, the character of the Wesleyan Preachers will ultimately beeome depraved ; Methodism be corrupted, enslaved, and debased ; and so become a curse to the world, instead of a blessing." Mr. H. B. King was a tailor—He attended the meeting, and observed, while a gentleman named Heckett was ad dressing the assembly from the platform, that the defendant and several other persons gave frequent interruptions to the speaker. The Chairman invited the defendant to go upon the platform to discuss the matter, but the invitation was refused. The hissing and confusion were so great that the speaker was obliged to desist. The LORD MAYOR—You evidently called the whole body, and invited a discussion ? Witness—The proposi tions were not to be discussed. The LORD MAYOR—How many were engaged in the opposition ? Witness—Fifty, or perhaps 100, and there appeared to be about 2,000 present. Mr. Berford, of Cottage-place, City-road, timber-mer chant, was Chairman of the meeting. The meeting took place not for discussion, but for stating the circumstances which led to the establishment of the association, and the objects it was intended to accomplish. After be opened the business, Mr. Robert Heckett rose to address the congre gation, and was repeatedly interrupted, particularly by two persons, one of whom was the defendant. Defendant and his friends expressed their diapprobation by hissing and hooting, which was met by such loud applause from the members to whom they were opposed, that the greatest in terruption arose from the noise made by the latter. The LORD MAYOR—But do you not allow any members of your body to express their disapprobation ? Witness— Certainly, we have no objection. We, on .the contrary, de sire it, for we get more information from our opponents. The LORD MAYOR—If, then, you are enlightened by the conduct of your opponents, why did you interfere with them upon this occasion ? Witness—They might have expressed their disapprobation as strongly as they pleased if they had only heard us out. The acclamations, in reply to the hissing, were the principal cause of the interruption. The LORD MAYOR—Applause is never considered as lan interruption, as far as I have been able to observe. I never yet saw a speaker who considered it with anger. The defendant denied that he had heard the Chairman call him to order. He disclaimed all idea of riotous inter ruption, but expressed, as he was justified in doing, his disapprobation of the propositions of which notice had been given in the placard. In those expressions he was joined by a great many others. Mr. Luke Farrar, uncle to the defendant, a surgeon in the Commercial-road, described the scene. The name of Farrar was called out several times, and Mr. Heckett asked the following question, " Whether any Pope of Rome, or Bishop of the Established Church, or Presbyter, or Mini ster of any other Church, had shown a snore domineering spirit, or more absolute power, than the Wesleyan Minis ters ?" The answer was expected by the majority of the meeting, and witness was ready to answer it, but could not obtain a hearing, and went away. It was half .an hour afterwards that the defendant was taken into custody. 'lle LORD MAYOR regretted to see such a division amongst the members of so respectable and influential a sect, and that an intolerant spirit was manifesting itself'. Although lie did not embrace the opinions of the Wesleyan Methodists, he 'was sorry indeed to see amongst them the seeds of a very prejudicial discussion ; and he the morn la mented that circumstance, in consequence of the well-regu lated nature of the institution. The meeting was a public one. He (the Lord Mayor) knew the way in which people expressed their disapprobation as well as their applause— (A laugh)—and it struck him as a monstrous thing that a Chairman should think of regulating the feeling of an as sembly by the aid of the police. He trusted that they would come to an agreement, but he altogether deprecated the authority exercised upon the present occasion, as in di rect violation of the liberty of the subject. Loud applause and clapping of bands from the one party followed this judgment, while the other party gave evident symptoms cf disappointment and chagrin. TOULINSON V. BRITTLEBANK. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD moved for a rule to show cause why the nonsuit in this case should not be set aside, and a new trial granted. It was an action for words spoken of an attorney, and was tried before Lord Denman at Stafford, when the plaintiff was nonsuited.—Rule refused. MAUGHAN V. WILKIE. This was an action on a tailor's bill. The defendant's son was at school at Cambridge, and it was for his use that these clothes were furnished. The clothes were furnished with the consent of his master, and there was no dispute about their being necessaries ; but there was no proof at the trial that they had been furnished at the desire of the father, or with his consent or knowledge, or by his autho rity. Mr. Baron Parke, before whom the case was tried at the last Assizes at Cambridge, thought that, under these circumstances, the action could not be maintained, and therefore directed a nonsuit. Mr. Kelly now moved to set aside that verdict.—Rule granted. BAIL COURT-THURSDAY. ARTICLES OF THE PEACE. Mr. MANSELL moved to exhibit on the part of Mr Thomas Wilson Richardson articles of the peace against Mr. Renton Nicholson. The articles stated that the ex hibitant had business at the King's Bench prison on the 7th of July last, in which prison Mr. Nicholson was con fined ; that while he was in conversation with the person to whom ~he went, Nicholson abused him, using the most scurrilous language, and struck him two violent blows ; but was restrained by the turnkeys from doing him further mis chief, though he threatened to break his neck. Since then, a few days ago, he had met him at the Insolvent Court, when he repeated his scurrility, and said, " such a villain was not fit to live in the world," and eventually hit him a blow. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE asked why Mr. Richardson had not gone before a Magistrate ? It was now four months since the first assault took place. The Court could not interfere. Mr. MANSELL said that Mr. Nicholson had been in prison ever since, and was to be discharged to-day from prison by the Insolvent Debtors' Court, and the exhibitant was apprehensive that he would carry his threats into exe cution the moment he got free. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE said ' that if the fact was so, G UILDHALL. Yesterday Thomas Bentley, a clerk in the service of Messrs. Lee, Coates, and Co., commission-merchants, Bread-street, was brought before Mr. Alderman BROWN, charged with stealing a quantity of silk goods and other articles from his employer. • After hearing evidence, Mr. Alderman BROWN told the prisoner, that unless he chose to speak, he did not wish him to do so, but he was ready to hear anything he wished to say. Prisorier—l will please to decline. Alderman BROWN—Then it is my very painful duty to commit you for trial. The prisoner was sent to Newgate. The Chairman of one of the City Temperance Societies yesterday appeared before Alderman Brown, to inquire how he should treat a man who had opposed the regularity of their proceedings ? Alderman BROWN inquired in what way ?—Applicant said he came in, paid no attention to the Chairman, wanted to speak on the platform, was removed to the other eqd of the room, where he endeavoured to do the same, and was ultimately, with a great deal of trouble, ejected. Alderman BROWN—Is it a place to which the public are admitted ? Applicant—Certainly ; but we do not now allow persons to express opposite opinions to those of the society. We used to allow a discussion, but we found it impracticable. Alderman BROWN said it was difficult to tongue-tie the public. He could not interfere. WORSHIP STREET. Last night James Lennard, a cowkeeper, was brought up, and charged with the murder of Esther M'Coran, a woman with whom he lived. The deceased was enceinte, and had been thrown violently on the ground by Lennard. She died next morning about nine o'clock, after horrible suffering. The prisoner was remanded till Saturday, to await the result of a Coroner's Inquest. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Sarah Jefferson, a dealer in coals and chandlery, pre sented herself before the Bench to demand reparation from one Mary Rickards, a damsel who dispenses to the public, at the corner of Peter-street, oysters, periwinkles, and other economical dainties, for having spit in her face, and be stowed on her an ample portion of that sort of oratory pe culiar to ladies educated in the classic regions of Billings gate. The complainant, who had evidently a strong spice of the virago in her composition, began her history of griev ances with great warmth the moment the necessary forms had been gone through. Complainant—On Wednesday artcrnoon, your Worships, I heard a violent screech in our court, which I know'd come from my little Sammy, and when I run out I found that Mrs. Richards's howdacious young ragamuffin had hit the helpless babby sitch a monstrous punch in his poor " corpus" that he wltn't able to eat his bread and butter. In course, I natrally took my child's part, and, in course, I couldn't help givin the other boy just a little tap with the tips of my fingers— Defendant—A tap, do you say ! Why you hit him with your two double fistes, with wengeance enough to break his back. Complainant—Soon after this here, while I was sarving a respectable young lady with a ha'penny onion, as a relish to h©r tea, this woman rushes up to my door, and hollers out, " Where's that (sanguinary) Missus Jefferson ?" I wouldn't take no notice of no sitch muck, and then she calls horrible names. She then comes into the shop, kicks up dust, and spits in my face. Defendant—l didn't spit at you at all. You should'nt take a false oath agin one of your own relations. Complainant (scornfully)—You nose my family has dis inherited you. They won't have sitch low cretures as you for one of their wisitors ; and you nose, since my brother demeaned hisself by marrying on you, that I won't have no connection with you. vv Defendant—Your Worship, I denies as I used low lang vidge. I've too much respect for my sex to say what's not proper. Mr. HALL—Can you settle the quarrel ? Complainant —No ; I'll have her tried at the Old Bailey first. Mr. HALL—Then we shall fine her one shilling. Defendant—l'll go to prison. rot in gaol all the days of my life, before I'll give her a farden. Mr. HALL—The fine goes to the King. Defendant—There's the shilling. I don't mind giving his Majesty that, or even twice as much. Mrs. Richard walked away in a sort of triumph, followed by the complainant, muttering angrily, •' So then, I'm to get no revenge.' In a moment or two the latter rushed into the office, her face in a flame, and called out, " There, she's insulted me agin. I know'd my life was in danger." Mr. HALL—Why, what has she done now ? Com plainant—She called me to my face a false-swearing war mint. Me, that's the mother of five children, and:wh ea lay in with my little Jemmy— t_ # What took place on that interesting occasion, mil like the author of " Junius" and the " Eikon Basilike be for ever hid from the knowledge of the public, as the officer cut short the communication by handing her to 1. 19 . door. Q UEEN-SQ UARE. Yesterday Thomas Todd, a young man, was charged be: fore Mr. BURRELL with attempting to murder his motir . The prisoner, while at the bar, expressed no contritiou whatever for his conduct. Mr. BURRELL thought him an incorrigible vagabond, s,nbae ordered him to find undeniable bail for his keep in g peace ; in default of doing so, he was sent to prison. MA RYLEB ONE. Yesterday Hannah Cowley, a pretty-looking . ° be' ne t more than twelve years of age, was placed at the bar fore Mr. HOSKINS, charged with committing the following robberies at the house of Dr. Mayo, No. 56, street, Cavendish-square. No. 6, The prisoner's mother, a laundress, residing at led Laxton-place, New-road, washed for the under - hou seM in the Doctor's service. On Wednesday evening the pr soner called to know if there was any linen, and being °6.' sired to wait was observed by Maria Monk, the u p per e housemaid, to leave the housekeeper's room with 0 0 clean stockings hid partly under her shawl. The wit° stopped her and took away four pair, which belonged to bell master, and on further searching her found concealed Mip her bosom a gold ring, her own property, which had bee. abstracted from a work-box in the same room. Th e P I soner was then given into the custody of a policeman, l'ed, on being asked if she had ever stolen anything else, eto mitted taking two pair of silk socks (which belongo d Dr. Mayo, and were missing about a month since) , al l rrh% Thursday last two gold brooches, a key, and a ring. brooches and socks she said she had pledged, and the "' and ring she had hid in an old boot in the area of bar ther's house, where they were subsequently found. • # be The property being produced by the pawnbroker;',,, prisoner (whose mother was present, and appeared e v , e ily whelmed with grief) said she stole.the things, and wa s le committed to Newgate for trial. Yesterday Henry Birch, a young man bearing the AP t • lation of " the walking ghost," was charged with persoeat; ing Guy Faux, and thereby creating a great disturbance ' causing a mob of disorderly persons to assemble togeth er 'd The prisoner, whose capture excited a great degree, surprise in the neighbourhood, on being placed at the was attired in a cocked hat, a pair of coarse h ol t trowsers, and an old military coat, his garments being st'; out with nearly a truss of hay, which gave him a n aPl)e t 3 4 , ance similar to that of Vanderdecken, in The Flying Dui man. In his hand was a long blunt-bladed carving' gibe d and round his waist a leather belt, to which were attac°_, a large horse pistol, powder flask, and lantern contain matches. The prisoner, who described the affair as a " lark, ;I, on promising not to repeat the offence, discharged , an d Hoskins, first ordering him to be stripped of his robes, ),, giving directions that the deadly weapons with wh ich • was armed should be for the present detained. l lO The prisoner then left the office, and was greeted -1 0 former admirers with exclamations of " the ghost's hini again." UNION-HALL Yesterday Ann Wilhs and Harriet Wordsworth , to acted as her servant, were brought up for re-exami n t; o o charged with obtaining goods under false represen ts" from tradesmen. The prisoners were then remanded. THE MARKETS. COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING THE itrgEk wo g ' Wheat. I Barley. Oats. Beans. Per Quarter. 's.to S. S. S. S. to S. 3. to • Blandtord 30 33 28 23 39 Brigg 35 3d 28 32 20 25 32 3 4 -- Cambridge--. 36 28 -- 12 i 35 ( Marti 35 40 24 23 16 20 36 8 Huntingdon --- 40 44 2.6 21 17 21 28 35 Lang Sutton.--. '3l 44 22 24. 135 37 Louth !32 SS i 25 29 114 18 32 35 ynn !36 43 28 30 22 20 36 4 2 3 3 Newark !32 39 27 33 16 26 55 45 "'" • Nottingham., 40 45 28 31 19 28 35 42 Peterborough !28 17 25 30 14 24 28 3 9 Plymouth :40 50 30 31 20 23 67 43 27 4 3 Slealord '65 70 36 38 22 28 41 4 3 Uppinghain 53 37 26 30 22 30 j 34 44 Wi6beeli 3O 40 20 f— 35 DEVIZES CORN • Per Sack. s. d. 8. d. First Wheat.... 2O 0 to 21 0 Second l6 0 18 0 Thirds 1196 Sacks of Wheat sold/ 17 7 at the average of LIARKET.—Nov. 5 s; 0 tl• Per Quarter. s. d. a , Barley.. 25 0 to 0 0 Oats l9 0 95 11 0 Beans (per sack) l7 0 29 ~, Flour (per bag)._ 27 „ v Bread (per gall.) 0 9 LREDS CORN M A RKBT. - - Nov. 3. IS• 1 4 Wheat, Ngrfollt and Suftblk, tiOlb. York. and Lincoln. 60th. Barley, 1•:otfo1k and Suffhlk Yorkshire and Lincolnshire G r i n ding Beans 63lb. Oats, I'otatoe —Mealing, For. 12d. to 13d Shelling Rapeseed, English, 26i. to 286. ...... .... Foreign, —/-t ( " 11-4.t;;;:t;I • Per:1;111i: SOUTHALL CATTLE MA lIKET.—Nov. 4 9 • TO s .: The supply of Beasts, Sheep, Calves, and Porkers, to this claY ~,,e. ket was moderately good. There was a moderate attendance o f did` and country buyers, and the trade was slut!, at the following r per stone 01 Sib. to sink the ottals : 'ls 44' to 4A; 44. Beef 2s. 10.1. to 3s. 10d. I Veal 4 of Mutton 210 3IU Pork 3 ' 6 Beasts, 340; Sheep, 3,600; Calves, 55; Pigs, u smals. A -1 port ion the supply left the market unsold _....., ROMFORD MARKET.—Nov. 4. d. i"4 I. to s. 4. Beef 9lO 310 Veal M 4 $ 8 utton 3 0 4 0 Pork Suckling Calves, 14s. to 305.; Quarter old Store Pigs. 64 . Mitch Cows, with their small Calf, 101.0 s. to 161. Os. Supply moderate, and trade rather dull LE WES M ARKET. I . 44 ' Beef l —Noy. 3. 3s. likt t° 3 41' jO,O Mutton 3 4 4 4 Pork 3 butt on A moderate supply; the trade with prime Beef and M brisk, but otherwise dull. ccv• MEETING OF CREDITORS TO-MORi t— C. Flight, tailor, St. James's-street ... ... . . . ................ 1 R. Noble, jun., corn-chandler, Upper ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' *Pimlico '''' A few days ago hand-bills were circulated 31 %0 the agricultural population of the Isle of Thanet, upon them to assemble in the neighbourhood o f the °sof workhouse, to take their prospects into consideratio,e' to determine upon the course to be adopted for their tee ral benefit. The surplus men of the Preventive ser'not were collected from the coasts, and stationed near tbeigirlot named for the meeting. The labourers, however, c ju bia' obey the call ; and the guard, after remaining in their is ing-place a considerable time, were dismissed to their rise tions. It was soon afterwards discovered that the u vi seo ce was a ruse of the smugglers, who, in the temporary 9'"ogd of the Preventive men, contrived to run a very l arge rpti c of valuable goods without detection.—Maidsto ne --- (ADVERTISEMENT.) -T. COX SAVORY, G° l4 : P oil &c., 47, Cornhill, London, informs the Public , that top SILVER WATCHES, on the celebrated PATEN T ,tehe CONSTRUCTION, (the most accurate on which a ,^ to t be made) for SIX GUINEAS EACH, with all the t ' a tir 110 1 7, provements, e. the detached escapement, jewelled in I° do , capped, hand to mark the seconds, hard enamelled dials lin taming power to continue going while winding up. _„„,a-b.- N.B. If in Hunting Cases, 10s. 6d. extra. Watches purchased in exchange. BIRTHS. of On the 3d inst., at South Shields, Durham, the ^a- 01 Freire Marreeo, Esq., of a son. Robed negi°2ll' On the 4th inst., at Upper Clapton, Mrs. a son. 0 1 MARRIED. , of _ d i r' On the 4th inst., at Kew Church, John Blackleg, 114,:'Celv City of Dublin, to Mary, daughter of the late Lieu tenalw ' 4 H field aver, of Kew. 10et On the 4th inst., at Hamble Church, the Rev. G eorge VP°l,e ' Vicar of Embleton, eldest son of the late Hun. Mr. Justice , to Clara Frances, fourth daughter of William Moffat, FA'A of tj' a f On the 29th ult., at Taunton, Captain George Pinchar"'bter," 3d Regiment of Madras Light Infantry, to Eliza, eldest cloA r ! e tsbr o f Charles Mogg, Esq., M.D., of Farringdon Gurney, Sottle,,oo,a On the 31st ult., at Kingston, Hants, Lieut. Charles Pe7 o ol, his Majesty's ship Howe, to Emma S. M. Rowes, third;' ,00 of William Rowes, Esq., of Elm-grove, Southsea, lateu 14151 Master-Attendant of his Majesty's Dockyard, Portsmout''t , On the 4th inst., at Saffron Walden, the Rev. R°b e :la 10 King, eldest son of the Hon. and Rev. Richard F itz g er to Caroline, youngest daughter of Thomits Smith, Escl• °f 5t the On the 3d inst., at St. Pancras, Mr. Richard Barnett, o f port, Worcestershire, surgeon, to Sarah Sophia, da"g hter f er late John Howell, Esq. r ap t, 61 0 0 On the sth inst., at St. George's, Hanover-square ft y t o St. John, of the 31st Madras Light Infantry, granhoolster i ' o l 3 o Hon. and Very Rev. St. A. St. John, Dean of W c " of Helen, relict of Henry Anson Nutt, Esq., and daughter Young, Esq., of Westridge, Isle of Wight. DIED. ve of of P. ll O On the 7th of June, at Ahmedabad, Emily Jane , vr- the Chatterton, Esq., Civil Surgeon, Kaira, and daughter 09, v ' Mr. Rush, of Pimlico, aged 26 years. On the sth inst., in Welbeck-street, Sir David Barri' A 1 8 0 F. R. S., K. T. S. ... vett Y - 0 On the 9th ult., at the house of her mother, at Sotlui ° ' ll° Amelia Elizabeth, second daughter of the late Arthur 0 Esq., of the War Office. . $Ol 4 On the 3d inst., at Tunbridge Wells, James Fouling' bit his 60th year. f SiA it 'clol/ :geP On the 4th inst., in Cadogan-place, Fanny, yr' isli Brickwood, Esq., formerly of Addiscombe, Croydon, SurreP, t he On the 2d inst., at Camberwell-grove, Martha, relict of ~i Mr. Wm. Lloyd, of Peckham, aged 85. of VOrgP On the 29th ult., Eliza, wife of Samuel Wall, Esq. , Xo o' Park, Hants, aged 47. of On the 4th inst., at Northampton, Cecil Becke, Esq. , bill ie shire-street, Queen-square, solicitor. On the 4th inst., at Poole, Dorset, Robert Were, s(l. '' m r , 70th year. J 11 ' On the 4th inst., Eliza Marian, infant daughter of ' low, Esq., of Wanstead, Essex, aged 14 months. . 149 ' London : Printed and Published by Mull,Do YOIJ. 51 N's ' 0 114 112, Strand, at The Sun Office, No. 112, Stra nd, of Middlesex. ~, e ;~. op, TUE .IEI 01(11'oOls, StOiro s ' ji Illantt3ereril •Coek'l for tarks of 1-1 the l, 183 5 'loya :fay be y daY of Sale Catalano(' of London, LIFE For 7,:a71;1' • yeainto ' partne, ) , s resp ect noe fitted • '!reet. (corn 1)11 Ineir pur c h APER-, Variety, and 404 which VICTOII 1, Great • BOTI (t.i• ;VINE ZS I ' from 'na.t o 1 scri iition, sn liCrers, at t! ,‘ Per pipe, t Sr I U o To Do It The APT bi `, N( %veil a f t A.SI Lond Ilt ord D XelV .")n. et.on T"ce of ne d e ,, 31191, an a ( "sit 1!. Sir RAUe~ henry 13c John Tiro Fr ederick Rev. Johi Charl C. es C / Y• r aptal , , 9 Loui s ,littnas ,I.tkrzi Cha 441 it ker s --I, Boliciter Niineere--= N w I,,: nl OUth ... . . Varig,i;;;• ... kr,tnlinChaP -ry SG Rib ,o bodb. • • Ip, w , •• It, ...... 14dtri g hexter ... intrc e R stord 'at, , ord LYnn t n„ ... 1. : 11 11; nsh am l+cheLster. ,11L--vut: :11usi:onEaosfsdtitl: eecirsioretiaroFcens' tioer, fun three %e ; 11 ", :fled i t ,, eited oubi . e et . r e , , ll eatt p r ( ITY, it th llvecti e Co rn `''stern JU the ~lctrop, tnedillrn S amuel I .I°ll ri Frec ll le ß riel J ozepli C Tho rn Williaan: t Ax . I OLY