The Sun. — London, England, 1835-09-24 00:00:00

- - ft EAST INDIA HOUSE. (Concluded from The Sun of yesterday.) Mr. SWEET brought forward his motion with regard to a certain class of maritime officers, whose claims to compen sation had been disputed by the Court, but whose right had been allowed by a Committee of the House of Commons. He understood a correspondence had taken place on the subject between the Board of Controul and the Court of Directors. It was therefore desirable, before he brought forward his intended motio n, that he should move, Tha the Court of Directors lay before the Court of Proprietors all correspondence s ubsequent to the resolutions of the Select Committee of the House of Commons in relation to those maritime officers to whom pensions or gratuities have yet been granted." He intended to follow up his motion by giving notice of another, to the effect and report u that the Di pon rect the ors should take into the ir consideration claims of officers of the Company who may not have been in the actual service of the Company for five years previous to the 28th of August, 1833. He felt himself justified in bringing this subject forward, in consequen.N of the resolu tions adopted by the Committee of the House of Commons with respect to the claims of officers alluded to. The Hon. Proprietor then read the resolutions of the Committee of the House of C o mmons, which were to the effec that it be recom mended that the case of officers should bet considerea whose interests had been affected by the Company's trade being discontinued. Th to e H he . motion for the Proprietor hop production ed that there of w ould be no objection t the correspondence. The CHAIRMAN sa id the Court of Directors had no ob jection to produce the correspondence. He suggested to the Hon. Proprietor, that be should refrain from giving his notice of m otion until be had received that c orrespondence. Mr. SWEET agreed to this arrangement, with the reser vation, that if he deemed it necessary he might bring the subject forward upon the next Court day. This was consented to. COMPLIMENT TO THE INDIAN ARMY. Sir C. FORBES alluded to an order from the Horse Guards for the purpose of recording the services of each regiment of the line. He regretted that it did not include the army of India. The CHAIRMAN said that the Court of Directors would be always happy to give effect to the Hon. Baronet's sug gestions. The Court then broke up. THE REGISTRATIONS. (Continued from the Sun of yesterday.) CITY OF LONDON; In reference to the decision on the claim of D. C. Thorn hill, Mr. Trott observed that, not expecting such a deci sion, the parties interested in the different objections had left the Court, and he was therefore not prepared to proceed. The lists of the parishes of St. Peter, Coralll, and St. Peter-le-Poer were then revised, and the Court adjourned at the usual hour. COMMON PLEAS. Mr. CRAIG gave judgment in the case of Thomas George Postan, who had claimed in respect of a house situate in Talbot-court, in the parish of St. Andrew Hubbard, of which he himself occupied no part, letting the whole of the house out to different tenants. Had the claimant, or even a servant of his, occupied but a portion of the premises, the case would have been different ; but as it was, the Court decided that the name of T. G. Postan be expunged. Mr. G. Hodson claimed in respect of premises in St. Andrew's, Holborn. The question in this case was, whether the payment of rates by a collector or overseer in behalf of a householder, without either the knowledge or authority of that householder, was a payment coming within the mean ing of the Act. Mr. CRAIG decided that the payment was not one within the meaning of the Act, and he therefore should expunge the claimant's name. In the parish list of St. Andrew, Undershaft, the claim of Mr. Andrew Collins, in respect of a counting-house in Lime-street, was objected, on the ground that he had not resided for the required time within the required distance. It appeared that the claimant up to 30th June last occupied apartments in Devonshire-square, at which period he left that place for a few months' visit to friends in the country, several residing within seven miles of London, and also on a tour abroad. During his absence he did not pay f,or the apar t me nts in Devonshire-square, but he left there books and other property locked up in a closet of which he retained the key, and he had come to an understanding with his landlady that on his return he should , resume the pos session of his apartments, which, indeed, were not let to any one else during his absence. On his return last wee his accordingly . books, &c., in the same place and state in which he had left them. The purpose for which he left the house was merely an excursion of pleasure. Mr. CRAIG decided that under the circumstances de scribed the claimant should be considered as resident within the meaning of the Act ; he was ready to admit that the question was one of considerable difficulty, and that a con trary decision might be justified ; but as it was, he consi dered it his duty to lean rather to the side of the claimant. Claim allowed. The Court adjourned at half-past four. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX. The Revising Barristers met yesterday to revise the lists of Hampstead, Highgate, Hornsey, and Wilsden. HAMPSTEAD. (Before Mr. MARTIN.) Amongst those objected to by the Overseers, was Mr. dobn Easthope. His claim was disallowed by reason of not being a resident for the period required by the Act. LETTING HOUSES FOR A SHORT TIME. Mr. W. A'Beckett was objected to by the Tories, on two grounds ; first, that he was not the assignee of the original lease, and, secondly, that he had let his house for three mon ths, and could not, therefore, be said to have been in occupation for the last twelve months. Mr. MARL IN postponed his decision until he received some further information from Mr. A'Beckett. This was an important question, particularly to 'the inhabitants of Hampstead, which this objection appeared to involve, and that was, whether a c laimant letting a furnished house for three months, with the animus revertendi, was entitled to be placed on the list. He was inclined to think that he was, but he would not then pronounce any decision on the point. SERVICE OF NOTICES SIGNED WHEN BLANK FOR THE NAME OF THE PERSON OBJECTED TO—ID/PORTANT DECISION. Mr. C. F. Adey (the Tory agent) was objected to, on the ground of not being in possession a suflicent time to qualify. Mr. Adey showed that this objection was untenable. But as be had been served with a notice of objection signed when blank, and as a great many notices of the same kind had been served, he was anxious to take an objection to the notice. Mr. Davis stated , in explanation, that a person had brought him the names of a great number of persons in this parish, to whom it was intended to object by way of retaliation for the numerous objections taken by the Tories. li e (Mr. Davis) was unwilling to have such sweeping a jectinns preferred, and went over the names with the per son referred to, and struck off those names to whom he consentad to have notice of objection given. Amongst those so distinguished, was the name of Mr. Adey. He then signed a nu m ti ber of noces of objection ,in blank, and the name of Mr, Adey was subsequently inserted in one of them by another party. Mr. MARTIN decided this to be a good service. Mr. Adey's claim was, as we have before stated, allowed. In a short time after this, Mr. Coventry came into Mr. Martin's Court, and said that a question bad come under his consideration in the other Court with respect to the service of notice, in the decisions of which he was desirous of having the assistance of his Learned Colleague. It ap peared that a voter in one of these parishes was of opinion that a certain number of claimants on the list were not en titled to vote : but because he was unwilling to act in what might be considered an invidious manner, by_signing no tices of objection himself, be went to Mr. Davies, and got him to sign several blank notices. The names of the per sons objected to were subsequently supplied without Mr. Davies's knowledge ; and when Mr. Davies was asked whether he had any objections to the individuals against whose claim notices of objection, signed by him, had been served, he replied that he had not. Now the question was whether these notices were valid. Mr. MARTIN observed that the cases referred to by" Mr. Coventry differed from that which he had decided with re spect to the objection served on Mr. Adey, in this :—that in the latter it was proved that Mr. Davies, and the person who applied to him, went over the names of the persons proposed to be objected to, and ticked those whom they de termined to serve with notices. Amongst the names of persons so marked was that of Mr. Adey. The notice must, therefore, be held to have been given with Mr. Davies's knowledge. In those, however, to which Mr. Coventry alluded, no such selection of names was deter mined upon. The Barristers were of opinion that the point was one which might then be argued, and decided that Mr. Coppock should speak in favour of' the validity of the no tices, which he accordingly did at great length. Mr. MARTIN then delivered his opinion. This was a point (he said) of difficulty and of importance. Ho was certainly strongly impressed with the opinion, before be entered on the performance of his duties on this occasion, that the service of notices, signed in blank, was insufficient ; and his reason for taking that view was, that, in his opinion, objections should not be taken by any party without proper consideration, and except on fit and weighty grpunds. His wish was to discountenance, so far be could, any vexatious system of giving objections by 1it019,514e, p u t he Innst Hear THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 1835. Tet i ih cell .' soe in mind that it was not their business to co,— cages, the policy of the law ; but it was their duty to that its provisions were neither warped or strained. On this question there was, at first, some slight difference of opinion between him self and his colleague ; but they had both now arrived at the conclusion, that a n otice of ob jection signed • in blank was not insufficient, provided tie party who delivered the notice acted as the agent of the person who signed it h e and that his conduct in so doing was subseq uentl y approved of by him. He would state the reasons which induced him to come to that opinion. He thought that the party who signed the no tices invested the party b'y whom they were brought to him with his authority for acting on them, and that he must be. held answerable for the proceedings which were sub sequently taken, and which he, in the first instance, had justified. It was certainly an indirect way of carrying into effect the service of a notice - but the party who signe d it in blank was, he tho u g ht, as c losely connected with the act of the agent, if it were filled up and served without his knowledge, as he could be by having the notice brought to 'Jim a short time before it was served, and the name of the party - objected to inserted in his handwriting, without either his inquhing or his being made acquainted with the nature of the object o. He was persuaded, therefore, that these notices might be st7ved in a manner which, though it might be more indirect, was u.: questionably more convenient than that which had been hither acted upon. In this case he' confessed that he was inclined to lean against the validity of the notices, seeing that the object of them was to restrict, not to extend, the franchise. But whilst that was not to be considered a crimi nal court, nor yet a civil one, though it must be admitted to be o f an anomalous nature, yet he could not consider its proceedings to have anything so penal in their character as to justify them in se tting aside principles laid down at Westminster in civil cases, which were closely analogous to those submitted for their consi deration. It was there assented to without an exception, be believed, as an axiom of law, that the subsequent re cognition of the authority by which any act was performed amounted to an original command. It was very true that if, was also a maxim of law that delegatus non protest delegare ; but this was not applicable to the present case, for Mr. Davie acted as a voter of Westminster, and voters dele gated his author.tv to an other. Although those who had been served" with notices of objection might have been put to some inconverijenee, there could not be saidved to be any substantial injustice Arne them by being ser with blank notices. On al l these giflunds, then, he should decide that the objection to the service of a blank notice was not a sound one, if the party objecting to, subsequently to affixing his signature , imp liedl y or directl y approved of the conduct of his agent. He trusted, however, that the Legislature, hearing of the strong feeling existing with re spect, to the service of notices, would be induced to intro duce some new enactment on the subject. • Mr. COVENTRY concurred in the view taken by his Learned Colleague. _ _- LETTING HOUSES FOR A SNORT PERIOD. The disposal of the cases turning upon the question to which we have referred in the previous part of our Re port was res9rved until the close of the proceedings. Mr. A'Beekett's claim, already alluded to, was admitted, it being allowed that he had been in possession. Mr. W. H. James's claim was objected on, on the ground that though he was in possession of his house at the end of the year 1834 and a portion of .1.835, that he had let the whole of it for two or three months within th Them which he was required by the Act to occupy R. question was, whether this could be held to be a constructive occu- pation. Mr. Adey contended that a person could not be said to be in possession of a house with respect to which he could not maintain an action as the occupier. Mr. MARTIN reserved his decision until he ascertained whether, if there were an indictment for burglary with re gard to this house, Mr. James would be the person called on to sustain it. Mr. Adey had, he thought, put the question in a clear light, by resting it on that point. He should, however, postpone the expression of his opinion upon the question until he had time to give it further con sideration. The numbers in this Court were as follow : By the Overseers l2 ' Sustained 12 By the Tories ... 26 By the Reformers Sustained ll Sustained 4 Failed ... . ...... .... .. 14 Failed Many of these objections were withdrawn when required to be proved. (Before Mr. COVENTRY.) The Learned Barrister gave judgment in the four cases which had been left over for consideration from the Staines list. Four individuals claimed to vote on freehold quali fication, as trustees of the church ; one of whom, in addi tion to his being a trustee, possessed an annuity arising from the church. The parties were objected to by the Conservatives. Mr. COVENTRY said he had had an opportunity of consider ing, yesterday, the validity of the four votes in the Staines list, three of them being for pews in the church, and one for an annuity granted out of the ChUrch-rates. The Learned Gentleman referred to an lict for rebuilding Staines Church in 1827, and the form of conveyance under this Act, from which he inferred the attribute and endu rance of real estate ; and the conveyance being to the purchaser, his heirs, and assigns , lie may be said to have an estate of inheritance, whic is not affected by the Re form Act. After quoting the Act of 8 Henry VI., cap. 7., he went back to the Local Church Act, citing the passages that bore on the question at issue. He considered that, though the conveyance of the pews prescribed by the Act purports to pass an estate of inheritance, yet it was not, he appre hended, an estate of inheritance in land or tenement within the meaning of any Act of Parliament relating to real estates. It was something anala g ous to a grant of navigation, which was a mere easement, giving no right to the bed of the river. The pews or seats of the Six Clerks are also somewhat similar, and these have uni formly been disallowed. The pew of the parish clerk was often insisted on, but with as little success, and there was not much difference between that and the present case, but being personal to the parties, and held on certain condi tions. The conveyance here was of the materials of the pew, but not of the land on which the pew stands. It was not, therefore, a profit arising out of.land or tenement, but a mere personal easement, ceasing when the party leaves the parish. In this view of the case, the Learned Barrister said he concurred—he must disallow the first three votes ; but as to the annuity that is charged on the church rates, these being levied by the Local Act on all the lands and tenements within the parish, it was not therefore a mere personal annuity ; and though granted to executors it was held for life, and as such was a freehold interest, en titling the party to vote if of sufficient value, as was ad mitted' in this case. He must therefore allow Dr. Sim mond's name, the annuitant, to stand ; and with this he closed the Staines list. PARISH OF WILSDEN. When the list of this parish was called upon, Mr. Mackintosh, overseer, appeared. He stated that there were no objections at the instance of the overseers. Mr. Gre g ory, for the Conservatives , directed t he atten tion of the Barrister to the list, which contained eight ob jections by the overseers. Mr. Mackintosh, when asked for an explanation by the Court, stated that he was totally ignorant of the nature of these objections ; they had been inserted in the list by the vestry clerk, unauthorized by the overseers. After some further 'conversation, the Barrister agreed o pass over these in the test, and proceed with the five ob- jeetions. When the first case was called upon to prove the notices, Mr. Mackintosh stated that he had received no notice as overseer. The notices of objection had been served by the Conservative party upon the individuals objected to, and notice had been served upon Mr. Kilby, the late assis tant overseer, but he had not received notice as overseer. He considered that the office of Mr. Kilby had literally died a natural death, inas much that, by the New Poor Law Act, there was no mention made of assistant-overseers ; only overseers were specified. The BARRISTER c ontidered that objection to be fatal, and he would consequently not allow the services to be good. The votes were allowed. The COURT then proceeded to hear the cases from the INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. Mr. Henry Milner, the dramatic author and solicitor, 94 his petition to be discharged. He was un api. oppose The insolvent, it appeared, had sold some property to Mr. Mears, of Covent-garden, who was related to him by marriage. His debts were not considerable. He eras dis t charged. was carrying a dead child in her arms, upon which he went up, and, on questioning, her, she said that the child was dead, that she had come up from Deptford to see her mo ther, who lived in North-street, and that it had expired on the way. The policeman accompanied her to North-street, and when the mother saw the prisoner, and was informed of what had happened, she said that her daughter had a husband, and that she had a right to look to him, and not come there to her. The prisoner was then taken to the workhouse; when it was discovered that life was not wholly extinct in the child, for the lips were observed to move, and when a little weak wine and water was administered it swal lowed a small portion, but shortly afterwards expired. The policeman subsequently saw marks of violence on several parts of the child's body, and a medical man was sent for who examined it more minutely. Mr. George Lownds, a surgeon, between twelve and one o'clock that day was called upon to give his opinion as to the probable cause of the child's death, and went to the workhouse for the purpose. When he arrived there be found that it was a female child, about eighteen months old, and at the time of his arrival it was not quite dead, but in the agonies of death, which occurred in a very short space of time afterwards. After an examination of the body he discovered that several marks of burns were visible on the back of the thighs and other parts, which appeared as if scared with a hot iron, a great portion of the cuticle hav ing been destroyed. The most serious external injury the child had sustained was on the back part of the thighs, by which it appeared , as if produced in consequence of its having been placed in a sitting position on a hot iron. There was also a mark on the child's arm as if pressure had been resorted to. He did not observe that there were any marks on the child's clothes as if they had been burnt. He was of opinion that the child's death was occasioned by the injuries he had described. The prisoner was now asked whether she wished to say anything in answer to the alleged charge of her having mur dered her child? She appeared quite regardless of the situation in which she was placed, and said that she had never injured the child. Mr. JEREMY—Explain how the child was burnt in the manner described by the medical gentleman. Prisoner—l neither burnt nor scalded the child. 1 knew that it was sore underneath, but I don't know how it came so. Mr. JEREMY—Have you always attended to the nursing of the child ? Prisoner—Yes ; there was nn one in the house but Adams and myself. She then went on to say, that about a fortnight or ten days ago, she took the child to the Dispensary at Deptford, to get advice for its teeth. Mr. JEREMY—Did you then show the burns on the child's person ? Prisoner—No, I did not. There were marks then, but I did not think they were so bad. In reply to the MAGISTRATE, the surgeon stated that the injuries on the child's person were of recent occurrence ; he was of opinion that they were inflicted within the last twenty-four hours. The prisoner was remanded for further examination. PARISH OF HORNSEY. When the proof of the notices commenced, there arose a difficulty, on account of the person being at a loss to re collect the names of the persons whom he had served with notices ; and there was also a difficulty on account of the person acting for the Liberal Association not being able to swear that he had authorized the service on a particular individual. A gentleman belonging to Hornsey explained that a test had been agreed upon by the Liberal party, of those to whom objections were to be made, and that Mr. Davies, for the Liberal Association, bad consequently signed the notices as objected, leaving the space blank for the name to be inserted. The notices had been filled up and served accordingly. This fad led to a long argument between Mr. Field for the Liberals, and Mr. Gregory for the Conservatives. Mr. CQvENTaY adjourned the case, and went into the other Court, Olen it was argued. The COURT then 'resuir.:4"—Mr..Thomas Sadler, Horn. - M'a freehold quap sey, clalauxl the right of voti ng by virtue - .o n .. lification. He was defended by Mr. Gregory on tne gervative interest. He produced his parchment, when it appeared the freehold claimed for was a vault under the church. The Court instantly rejected the claim. The case caused pop laughter, that I came off"—l saw a child. Immediately upon my going there, mistress said, " There is the child, Ayah, look." Then I was desired to leave the tent ; this was about half-past nine. I did not tell her that I came to take the child. I brought a letter from my master to a gentleman named Ltidor, and that gentleman gave me,a letter to Mr. Best. Mistress told me, " Take this little baby, Ayah— take care both children—l can't come any more." I saw a gentleman, Mr. Best, in the tent ; when I went into it he went out. Mr. Best was in the habit of coming to my master's to eat his meals. Damages, 10,000 rupees. THE ARMY. (From the Limerick Chronicle of Saturday.) A paragraph recently appeared in the Limerick Chronicle about the organisation of an Ordnance Brigade for the Queen of Spain. The highest personage in these realms has, it appears, signified to Sir Hussey Vivian, Master- General of the Ordnance, in the last week, his displeasure that any men enrolled and serving in the King's army, should be encouraged to enter into the service of any foreign power. Notice ,froin such an illustrious quarter would not have been made of the circumstance, but for the inducements supposed to be held out to se respectable and effective a branch of the army, as the Royal Artillery force. t None of the Artillery in this garrison have volunteered to join the Queen of Spain's expedition in the brigade form ing by Captain Colquhoun. The men are aware of the permission given, but have not availed themselves, as no direct proposal has been made to them on the subject from authority. Major Milner, 94th, has joined that regiment in this gar rison from leave, and Captain Tulloch is daily expected. Illuminations took place in Thurles, and tar barrels were lighted, when a division of the 95th regiment marched into that town on route from Fermoy to Templemore. The Ro man Catholics of Thurles believed the 95th to be formed almost exclusively of persons of that persuasion, and this public demonstration was to evince their feelings for that regiment in contrast with the 35th, which respectable corps is in a great degree composed of Protestants, who met a very different reception on the march. What an unhappy impression must exist where questions were earnestly put— " How many soldiers in the 95th go to mass—how many Roman Catholic officers in the regiment ?" The officers of the 79th Highlanders have been fur nished with caps, belts, and epauletts of a new and costly pattern. The 17th regiment has most probably ere this quitted New South Wales for the Indian establishment. The . ) , were preparing to embark last May, to the general regret of the inhabitants of Sydney. The 94th regiment in this garrison is' stated in the Parlia mentary report to hold a warrant for an Orange Lodge in the corps. On inquiry we find there is no lodge whatever in the regiment. Colonel Warre has returned to Dublin from leave of ab- sence, and has resumed his duties as Assistant-Quarter- Master-General. Major Forster, K.H., having left Dublin for England on leave, Colonel Warre will act as Assistant Adjutant-General of the eastern district, during Major Forster's absence. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. ADVICES, ARRIVALS, AND DEPARTURES AT THE SCOTCH WHARFS, SEPTEMBER 23. DOWNE'S WHARF.—Departures : the Dundee, Perth, and London Shipping Company's steam-ship Perth, John Spink commander, for Dundee, with goods and passengers ; the Bridport Shipping Company's vessel Prompt, Richard Trayto master, for Bridpor t. MILLER'S WHARF.—Advice : the London . and Edinburgh Shipping Company's smack Favourite, James Dickson master, arrived at Leith the 19th inst., after a very. quick passage. ABERDEEN STEAM-WHARF.--Arrival : the steam-ship Queen of Scotland, John Pearson commander, from Aberdeen, with goods and passengers. LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF.—Departures the Lona a n and Glasgow Shipping Company's steam-ship Royal William, Andrew Richardson commander, for Leith, with good , . and passengers. LEITH AND BERWICK WHARP.—Arrivals : the Lov . don and Leith Old Shipping Company's smack Earl of We.myss A. Brown master, from Leith ; and the Berwick Shipping dom pany's smack Stately, William Stevenson master, from Ber wick, with general cargoes. VESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT THE CUS TOM-HOUSE, SEPT. 23. Vrav Drewke, Boverkam, fiom Warekum ; Henry David son, Williams, Jamaica ; Rawlins, Marr, Jamaica ; Eden, Hearn, Jamaica ; Unicorn, Mullens, Petersburg ; Ceylon, Batty, Montreal and Quebec ; Hope, Boxer, Rotterdam ; Batavier, Dunlop, Rotterdam ; Vissery, Jelsma, Workum ; James, Craig, the Coast of Troy, Adaunbroke Bay; Earl Bathurst Kennedy, Hamburgh; Caleb Angus, Laurence, Belize ; Friends, Sparrow, Guernsey ; Fine, Page, Antwerp ; Brockelbank, Middleton, Boulogne ; New Blossom, Mills, Villaviciosa; Forager, Price, Jamaica; Christian Charlotte, Daniel, Copenhagen. • ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, SEPT. 23. Boadicia, Wright, for Hobart Town ; Spartan, Ellis, Alex andretta ; Galatea, Alexander, Sierra Leone; Tweed, Slo combe, Sierra Leone ; Attwood, Morfee, Antwerp ; Aldbro, Storey, Antwerp; John, Saddercombe, Lisbon ; Hopewell, Parent, Jamaica ; Roslin Castle, Richards, Sydney ; Sarah, Wrightson, Gibraltar and Malaga. CLEARED OtTWARD§ IN CARGO, SEPT. 23. Briton, Parkes, for St. Helena ; Elise, Kasten, Stettin ; Marys, Lowther, Guernsey and Jersey ; Gun, Lainzed, New foundland ; Attwood, Morfee, Antwerp ; Northam, Carter, Amster darn. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, SEPT. 23. Jessie, Davidson, for Memel. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. Bayne, Richa:son, London to Bombay, lat. 6. N. long, 15 . by the Fj;iza, Johnson, arrived at Pernambuco. Charles Kerr, -London to Sidney, N. S.W. 13th ult. lat. 10. long. 24.; 1-1 P;Iton, Liverpool to. Boston, 16th inst., lat. 49. long. 14. by the Lord Althorp, arrived at Liverpool. Vansittart, Mar quis, London to Madras, 3d ult., lat. 7 S. long. 23. W., by the Hirondelle, arrived at Havre. Albion, Fisher, Liverpool to St. John's, N. B. ldt. 49. long. 11. by the Blenheim, ar rived in the Downs. Persian, Belfast to Bay Chaleur, 14th inst. lat. 47. long. 24. by the Countess of Airlic, arrived off Falmouth. EAST INDIA. ARRIVALS AT SIMON'S BAT.--The Solway, July 2, from Calcutta. -- - - - .. ARRIVALS AT ALGOA BAY.—The Atlantic, June 20, from London ; the Elizabeth, 25th, from Table Bay. DEPARTURE FROM TABLE BAY.—The Thomas Peile, July 1, for Dublin ; the Thomas Snook, for Mauritius ; the Courier, for Algoa Bay. ARRIVALS AT Sr. HELENA.—The Mercurius, July 28, fro Batavia. ARRIVALS AT BAY OF ISLANDS.--The Anne, March 17, from London, and left April 8 ; the Charles, April 20., from Lon don, and left April 28; the Rose, May 1, front dalifax ; the Elizabeth, May 5, from —, and expected to sail June 2; the Hope, May 31, from London. ARRIVALS AT HOBART TOWN..2I'k Lady of the Lake, April 24, from Canton ; the I t lediterranean Packet, 24th, from Cape. DEPARTURES.—The Evelyn, April 26, for London ; the Caledonia, 26th, for swan River; the Halcyon, 26th, for New Zealpd. ARRIVALS AT CANTON.—The Macmara, March 26, from Manilla; the Loujie Family, 28th, from Bombay. DEPARTURES.—The Good Success, March 26, for Bombay ; the Sumatra, 29th, for Boston ; the Roman, 31st, for New York ; the Mary Frazer, 31st, for Manilla. ARRIVALS AT SINGAPORE.—The Skimmer, April 19, and Catherine, 19, from Malacca ; the Antigua Packet, 20th from Batavia; the Sulimany, 23d, from China. DEPARTURES.-The Emily Jane, April 17, and Arethusa, 19th, for China ; the Sir A. Campbell, 21st, for Bombay ; the Zephyr, 22d, for a cruize. ARRIVALS AT CALCUTTA.-The Corsair, April 22, from Penang ; the Margaret, 23d, from Philadelphia and Monte video. DEPARTURES FROM SAITGOR.—The Edmonstonc, April 23, for Singapore and China; the Eleanor, 23d, for Madras ; the Pioneer, 23d, for Philadelphia; the Cavendish Bentinck, 24th, for Mauritius. , INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT. The Matters of the Petitions and Schedules of the Prisoners hereinafter named (the same havinebeen filed in the Court) are appointed to be heard at the Court-house, in Portugal street, Lincoln's Inn-fields, on Monday, Sept. 28, 1835, at Nine o'clock in the Forenoon. Barritt, S., Freeschool-street, Horselydown, Southwark, lighter- man. Clarke, T. Redditch, near Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, needle- manufacturer. Downing, J., Merton, Surrey, calico-printer. Figgitt, C., Redditch, near Bromsgrove, Worcestershire, needle- manufacturers. Lawson, F., Ebenezer-place, Bermondsey, clerk. Metcalf, J. D., Theobald's-road, victualler. Payne, T. C., Oxford-street, clerk. Sawyer, J., Great Marlow, Buckinghamshire, corndealer. Sharp, J. f., New-street, Kennington, part proprietor of patents for distillation and manufacture of sugar. Wallis,.W. F., Ham, near Kingston, Surrey, baker. Whitmore, J., Lark-row, Martha-street, Cambridge-bath, lime burner. Winn, H., Regent-street, shopman. On Tuesday, Sept. 29.—Same Hour and Place, Collins, C., Woeking, Surrey, farmer. Cressy, J., Mill-place, Limehouse, first oroor cs atl fndiaman. Deacon, H., George-street, BlackttAr*.road, plumber. Netired Commander in his Ma- Kelly, M , Dean-street, Hol i 4R,. jesty's Royal Non, Luff, J, NT:I-0, Lambeth, Weller. p easg , Stockbridge-street, Stockbridge, Hampshire, cooper. S.;flanway-street, Oxford-st ree t, tailor. Ba\TYet', C., Alpha Cottage, King-street, Hammersmith, t eac h er. Siminons, D„ Harrow -street, Lisson-grove, Padding - ton, exhibitor of magical illusions. Smith, 5,, Gloucester-place, Old Kent-road, dealer in milk. Solomon, H., Sandy's-row, Christ Church, Spitalfields, ski n -d ea l er. Williams, L. W., Old Bailey, London, coffee-housekeeper. CORONER'S INQUEST. Last evening an inquest was holden at the Black Horse Tavern, Kingsland-road, before Mr. Baker, the Coroner. on the view of the body of Miss P. Powell, a young woman, twenty-one years of age, the daughter of a respectable ex cise officer, who committed suicide under the following cir cumstances : Benjamin Waddell, aliairdresser, residing at 28, Bacchus walk, Hoxton, was well acquainted with the deceased, who resided next door to him with her father, and was twenty one years of age. The last time he saw her alive was about seven o'clock on Monday evening, when she was at the corner of Bacchus-walk, and gave him a note, directed to Mr. Badcock, saying, " Give that to Mrs. Badcock— good by—there's a dear," and then went away. He under stood that she kept company with a young man named Peter Lovick,.but their acquaintaince had been discon tinued for some time past, and this he thought had some effect upon her spirits. The following was the note alluded to, and which was identified as being in the handwriting of the deceased My sister has done this. My love to all. Give my dying love to Peter. lam drowned. " P. POWELL. Mrs. Mary Badcock deposed that the deceased had for some time past carried on a correspondence with a young man named Peter Lovick, but he has latterly broken off the acquaintance on account, as he alleged, of his family not approving of the match. This bad caused a great de pression of spirits, and she had frequently complained to witness about it. On the Saturday witness saw her crying bitterly, and on asking her the cause, she replied that she bad seen the brother of her lover, and he told her that his friends were more for than against the match, and there fore her lover must have told her that which was not true. This she said would break her heart, and she wept most bitterly. As soon as she got the note which had been pro duced, she went to her sister, and they used every effort, by going in all directions in search of her, to prevent the unfortunate calamity. Witness, in conclusion, said she was certain the breaking off the match with her lover, had led to the commission of the unfortunate act. George Heath, on Monday evening, about eight o'clock, was near the Regent's Canal-bridge, and heard the children cry out that a person had jumped over the bridge. He in consequence ran to the bridge, and saw the body of the de ceased in the canal. A Newfoundland dog instantly jumped into the water, and would have dragged the body on shore, had not her bonnet string, which the animal held by, broken. The drags wdre instantly procured, and the body was got out in “bout a quarter of an hour. It was instantly con veyed to the workhouse, when a medical gentleman attended, and every means to restore animation were resorted to, but without effect. The CORONER then- summed up the evidence, and the Jury, without hesitation, returned a verdict to the effect, that the deceased had destroyed herself while labouring un der temporary insanity. At the request of the Jury, the young man Peter Lovick was called into the room ; and, in reply to the quest ; :ons of the Coroner and Jury, he said he was only 19 'years of age, and had broken off his acquaintance 7ta the deceased at the desire of his friends. CALCUTTA. SUPREME COURT, APRIL 9, 1 835 . CRIII. CON. CHRISTOPHER LETHBRIDGE V. CHARLES HENRY BEST.—DAMAGES LAID AT 30,000 RUPEES. • The ADVOCATE-GENERAL stated the case for the plain tiff. The plaintiff is a Colonel of Infantry, and the de fendant, a Captain of Artillery—both in the Company's service. The plaintiff was married to Mrs. Lethbridge in 1823. The match was originally one of affection ; they lived together 10 or 12 years, and had five children. The defendant was on intimate terms with the plaintiff, and re ceived from him every attention and kindness which it was possible for him to expect at the hands of a brother officer. When about to quit Kamptee, Captain Best was invited to a farewell dinner ; but though it was specially upon the occasion of his leaving the place, Captain Best, to the sur prise of all, was not there. The dinner, however, was partaken of, and Colonel Lethbridge, who was one of the party, returned home between nine • and ten o'clock, and then he found that his wife had left him. The plaintiff's wife at the time of the elopement was on the eve of her confinement, and was subsequently delivered of a daughter at a place called Taukelgaut. The plaintiff hearing of this, sent two female servants to take charge of the child. Captain Best, who was with Mrs. Lethbridge when these servants arrived, left the tent soon after they came in. Mrs. Lethbridge inquired after her husband, and wept when she was told that he was in great misery—that he was in tears. This, if the defendant bad any feeling about him, and it is impossible to suppose him dead to all the finer feelings of the human breast, must have stung him more than anything e l s e—and, if the. Learned Counsel had not mistaken human nature, such a scene as this could not have taken place unless there were an affectionate bearing on the part of her husband, and of fond reflections on her own. The Learned Counsel having concluded, put in the defendant's admission of the fact of the plaintiff's marriage on the 18th December, 1823, and called J. C. Morris, Esq., sworn—l am a member of the Civil Service, and know Colonel Lethbridge, of the 22d Regi ment N. I. I have known him since 1827, when we met and were near neighbours on the Neilgherry Hills for seve ral months. Mrs. Lethbridge was living with him. They had one little girl with them, another little boy, I under stood from them , they had left at Cochin. I became ex tremely intimate, and visited them daily almost, and had most undoubtedly the fullest opportunity to see on what term s they lived. They seemed to me to b e a mos t h appy cou ple—he was very much attached to her, and she ap peared particularly attached to him. Caumatchee sworn—l was an Ayah in the service of Mrs. Lethbridge. About six o'clock in the evening my master dressed himself, and went to a supper. I remember go i ng to fetch a child. My master went to the dinner about five days before I went to fetch the child, my mistress was then in the large hall drinking tea. I remember she went to her bed-room about seven o'clock in the evening. Upon my master's coming home he went and looked in the bed-room, and asked me where she was. I said, " She i,% inside." My master said, "No she is ppA." repeated that slip was. My mu t ter said, Come and see ; she is not there ! " Myself and dressing boy th en went and looke d , and my mistress was not there. I n ever saw my mis tress ag ain in that house. The fifth d a y a f ter my mistress, left OP 1 1 P 1 P e ! WPO C 4 . 9° T au ril ic-MIPAPP. 'My mistiess W 45 4 Ta4fifa9tl fP1 1 1 1 (1 tier at Taukelgaut in a tent, and spoke tp her in the 14pgpagp. $.11.e said to mo, " How is master, Ayall?" I said, Mager --,wry. can't !at anything , " Mistress c r i e d, an d told --- , r—she said," ver' foolish very --, • me to go out, and 1 came 0,r,..4 CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. Frederick Robinson, ab ed '27, formerly an Ensign in the army, and highly connected, was indicted for stealing a mare of the value of 101., and a saddle of the value of 125., the property of Joseph Warner. The prisoner declined saying anything in reply to the charge, or calling any witnesses to his character. Mr. Baron GURNEY summed up the evidence. The Jury immediately acquitted the prisoner. 'Thonws Pool, aged 40, a respectable looking man, wes indicted for stealing a gold watch case of the value of 101 . , the property of John Palmer, his master.—The prisoner made no defence, and the Jury acquitted him. The prisoner was again indicted for stealing a watch from Julius Stauffner, a watchmaker. The Jury found the prisoner Guilty. Mary Starkey, aged 18, was indicted for stealing monies to the amount of 601., and other articles, the property of Wm. Holt ; and Martha Starkey, aged 49, was indicted for feloniously receiving the same, well knowing them to have been stolen. The Jury found both the prisoners Guilty. Nicholas Powers, aged 28 ; Justine Jones, aged 22 ; and Joseph Range, aged 22, were indicted for stealing a quan tity of copper, the property of Henry Hughes, their master ; and John Linney, aged 20, for receiving the same, well knowing it to have been stolen. The evidence not being conclusive, the Jury acquitted the whole of the prisoners. At five o'clock the Judges left the Court, and the RE CORDER took his seat on the bench. Lawrence Hebden, aged 17, was found Guilty of ripping and stealing a quantity of lead from the roof of a house be longing to Mr. Thomas Beck, of Deptford. The prisoner was sentenced to be imprisoned for twelve months in the House of Correction, and kept to hard labour. John Wicks, a g ed 17, was found Guilty of robbing his employer, Mr. Staples, of the Borough, and was sentenced to.three months' imprisonment. Thomas Robinson, ag ed 15, was found Guilty o f stealin g a handkerchief from th person of Richard Crossley, map maker, of Holborn. The COURT sentenced the prisoner to be transported for seven years. The RECORDER informed the Jury that, perhaps, the sentence might appear very harsh to them, unless some ex planation was given. Boys under sixteen years of age were sent to what is termed the Boy's Ship, where they were either taught a business, or educated. Provided the conduct of the prisoner was good, he was liberated long be fore the term of his sentence expired, and, being taught an useful business, was placed in a condition of obtaining an honest livelihood in future. Under these circumstances there really was more benefit conferred on a prisoner than if sentenced to a short period of imprisonment. LONDON SESSIONS.-WEDNESDAY —....m.-- . Mr. Payne applied to — the Court to affiliate a child to a lad, aged 19, named Henry Parker. The corroborative evidence was to be found in letters froth the reputed father to the mother. Mary Ann Mabbott , in Septe mber, 1834, lived in the service of the defendant's brother, in the Quadrant. The defendant was shopman to her master, and was the father of her child. She had entered the service in February, and the intimacy commenced in September, and the child was born in June. All that the defendant proposed to pay was 1/. 10s, for the expenses of the confinement, and 2s. 6d. a week for the support of the child. The letters given in proved this acknowledgment of the paternity. Defendant —Nothing but fear made me write those let ters. She has made me the dupe of another man, whom I believe to be the father of the child, and who used to be constantly after her at the time. The RECORDER- -1 suppose it is meant by the Act that caution should be used, that restrictions should be placed upon charges, frequently made for the purposes of extor tion. It is not for those who sit to administer justice to s ay anything of the policy of Acts of Parliament ; but I suppose the meaning of the Act is, that we should cau tiously look to the circumstances in proof of the charge, and the sum to be awarded. Now, the letters are corro borative testimony, and I think the sum offered by the young man quite enough under the circumstances.—Order made accordingly. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. . A man named James Prior, for many years a porter in Leadenhall-market, was brought before the Lord Mayor, upon suspicion of having been concerned Little several other p er sons in robbing Mr. Kemp , of No. 23, Eastcheap, of a pocket-book, containing bank-notes to the amount of between 301. and 401. Mr. Kemp stated that as he was going along near Leadenhall-market, at a little after seven o'clock on Thurs day evening, he was pushed by some fellows, who were collected about the corner of Camomile•street. He en deavoured to get on quietly, but he received a violent shove from some person with a knot on his shoulder, who proved to be the prisoner. He immediately turned round, and put his hand upon the knot, but he had scarcely done so when the prisoner struck him ,and knocked him down, and then made off. Six or seven fellows then surrounded him, under the pretence of giving him help, and in the confusion he was robbed of his pocket-book. He was also kicked and tripped up by the gang, one of whom had the appear ance of a Jew. The latter person dragged at his gold watch, which was very valuable, but which was protected by so powerful a gold chain that the thief tugged in vain at it with all his might. As soon as he could the prosecu tor went in pursuit, and he saw the prisoner in a public house near the market, and the Jew thief entered, and called the prisoner " Jim ;" and, from all the circumstances combined, the prosecutor had no doubt that the prisoner was one of the gang. A man named Gibbon said that as he was passing he saw the prisoner push against Mr. Kemp, and Mr. Kemp push against the prisoner's knot. The prisoner then struck and knocked down Mr. Kemp and went away, and six or seven persons then got round Alr. Kemp, and appeared to be hustling him, and soon afterwards he complained of hav ing been robbed. The prisoner was going to his own house, from Leaden hall-market, with some pieces of fat, his perquisites, upon his knot, when, in passing the corner, he received a blow, not on the knot, but on the small of his back, from Mr. Kemp. He certainly returned the blow, which he had done nothing to deserve. He (prisoner) asked, Mr. Kemp to give him in charge, if he wished, and he afterwards went into the public-house, but he saw nobody there whom he knew. The LORD MAYOR—Did you not see persons about Mr. Kemp, after you struck him, ill-using him ? Prisoner— Not at all. The LORD MAYOR—Why, do you not recollect the Jew fellow who called you " Jim ?" Prisoner—Not a creature said a word to me. Mr. Kemp—Why, when I was going to follow the Jew fellow who tried to get my watch, the prisoner held me, to prevent me. A person called, too, at my warehouse on Sa turday, and told Inc he thought I might have my pocket book back if I wished, bu he said that I must not appear at the Mansion-house. The Prisoner—l know of no Jew fellow. I only struck because I was hit. I didn't stop to see any disturbance. Mr. Kemp—When the prisoner ran away several tried to rob me.. One struck me on the hat, another tried to trip me up, The prisoner was afterwards found hidden under a cart. The Prisoner —What would I be acquainted with such characters for ? I am entrusted to collect 2001. or 3001. at a time, and who has ever seen me with people of this de scription ? The LORD MAYOR asked the officer whether the pub lican into whose house the prisoner went on the night of the robbery recollected the circumstance that a Jew called the ,prisoner " Jim ?" me T m h b e er o e ffi d chearvireegplsieeedn t th h a e t pthrieseepeurblein that night, b u t didcan perfectly we ll re not see anybody speak to him. The prisoner was then remanded. Mr. Kemp's face was much disfigured, and his limbs were much bruised, by the severe treatment to which he been.subjected. had MARLBOROUGH -STREET. A couple of Irishmen, named Condell and Cunningham, came before Mr. CHAMBERS, the latter charged by the other with having stolen a number of Orange lodge warrants. Mr. CHAMBERS Would postpone the case to Thursday, In 4 retain the Orange lodge documents, as he was of opi• ;l ion they were only used for purposes of fraud, ---- ,-,-- a woman about thirty y ears o f up/Jo/V. HALL. Yesterday Harriet Anghs, age, was brought before Mr. JEREMY, charged on suspicion ' -.4 "' murdered her illegitimate child, with nay...... -, ,, man of the P division, as h e was George - Morgan, a p0u.,.--- -' 1- " 1 "A- Locks standing at the station-house door in rari,,,,—, fields, that morning saw the prisoner and several women round her in the road. The women said that the prisoner I SPORTING INTELLIGENCE• BLANDFORD RACES, TUESDAY. , The Dorsetshire Gold Cup, value WO sovs. (in specie), by sub- The of 10 sovs. each; three yrs old, 6st. 101 b.; four, Bst. 11b. ; five, Est. 101 b. ; six, Oat. ; and aged, 9st. 21b. The winner of a King's Plate, or the value of 100 soya., including his own stake , in 1W.35, previous to the day of running, to carry 51b• extra' mares and geldings allowed 31b. Two miles and a d istance ' Ten subs. Mr. Etwall's Revenge, 5 yrs • 1 Mr. C. Finch's Outcast, 3 yrs ........ Lord Ilchester na. Blenheim, 4 iirs 3 A Plate of 501.•; three yrs old, 7st. 41b.: four Bst. 101 b. The win ner of a Plate, Match, or Sweepstakes, this year, to carry 51b. of two, 61b. extra. Mares and geldings allowed 31b. two miles. Sir E. Baker's Spume, 4 yrs 1 1 Mr. S. Herbert's Burlington, 3 yrs 2 2• Mr. C. Finch's Blenheim, 4 yrs The Yeomanry Cavalry Stakes of 3 sovs. each, for horsi,s of a" ages riot thorough bred, that have been regularly workrAl in th e , field with the Dorchester Regiment or idependent, troops 0' Yeomanry Cavalry, ridden by Yeomen or Tradesmrn residen t in Dorsetshire. Heats, one mile over the New Ce.r.ge. Thirteen subscribers.. Mr. Farquharson's Smuggler, 5 yrs ........*.. .. 1 1 Mr. H. W. Portman na. Kingston Lass .... Mr. H. Gee's St. Giles, 6 yrs WORTHING RACES" TUESDAY. The Worthing Stakes. IViile heats. Mr. Irish's Tallyho Wanderer , Mr. Enoch's Miss Frisks)? . 2 2 Mr. Blunden's Castinet •.. The Hack Stakes. Mile heats.' Mr. R. Holmes's Arundel .. Mr. T. Lee's M‘Gregor Cob St akes. Mile heats. Mr. Tuff's Lila . Mr. J. Cortis's Grey waist Mr. W. Dennett's :ttkntar First Cl2.ss Ponies. Half a mile heats. Mr. Webberle_y's. Isabel Mr. Stubbs's Fanny Grey Mr. E. Benn ett' s P o lyp us The Second Ciars Ponies, half a mile heats, was won by O . ' Dowley's Bob. S7' LEONARD'S RACES, SEPT. 15. P aties under 13 hands high. The last half mile. Mr. Trower's Deception .. M. 'Thomas's Lady Hamilton ... Ug b The I ,9,,t ua ll ers ' C u p a n d S wee p s t a k es , f or h orses no t tharci , . brer) . , nor exceeding 14 hands 3 inches. Heats, one mile 4116 ed•Aance. Mr. Rickword's Mermaid, 5 yrs Mr. Martin's Willie Wilkie, aged 2 Mr. Redford's Brown Bess, aged . 2 3 Mr. Rawlinson's Mapplehurst, 4 yrs.— .„„ 4 4 Mr. Chasemore's Chance, aged 10 4 The Town Cup and Sweepstakes, for horses not thorough . Heats, two miles and a distance. Mr. Howes's Lilly of the Valley, 4 yrs Mr. Coppard's Miss Peggy, 4 yrs ~., 2 dr Mr. Lee's Fencer, 4 yrs .. The Ladies' Purse was won in three hesats by Mr. Bazalg e ' Spicey, beating two others. The Hunters' Sweepstakes and Purse (heats, two miles sads distance), was won by Accommodation, beating six others. for The Yeomanry Cup, presented by IJ. D. Goring, Esq., ALti, horse' belonging to the Arundel 'a n d'B ram b er Y e omanry. e " one mile and a distance. Mr. G. Penfold's Wigge.e.tolt ... Mr. Cook's Arundel .. Mr. 11. Watkins's Bebine, aged •• 2 3 Captain D. Duke's hi ope, aged dr T' 1E MARKETS. COAL MARK s. d Atlair's ..........„ ......... ~ 18 6 leans Primrcat. • l7 3 Holywell Ditto Reins., lB 0 Ord's Iledbr,gh l7 0 Pontop Wtndsor l7 9 Pektw South 'Klartley . lB 0 .1.8 119 eld l9 6 We,,t Hartley R' ylam Hartley L'angennech Coal 23 0 Neville's Llanelly Parrott 2O 0 Stanley Main _.... Per Ton ET.—Sept. 23. Per Ton. ~ d o c 0... ql , Walls End Bewicke and *" Walls End Clark and Co.. ..... go Walls End Hilda .............. g o V . 9 Walls End Hotpur .............. Qa Walls End Killingworth ...... f, 3 Walls End Newmarch .......... Walls End N ort h um b er l a nd. ; fij Walls End Perkins .............. Walls End Braddyll's ............ 3"„ Walls End Hettou ............... 6 Walls End Lambton ............. ;`,l Walls End Stewart's ........ 21 : 1 Walls End South Durham... 2 1 Walls End Tees ................ oi Walls End St. Helen's 'fees.' . 0 Walls End West Hetton ..... l'ran eilt 16 3 Ships arrived since last market day, 16. ORN MARKETS DURING THE WE COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING THE Wr.-2,1.:i . eas e Wheat. Barley. Oats. Beans. v Per Quarter. s. to s. s. to a. s. to s. a. to B. S. tr O. 54 60 30 34 23 31 .1 ? 38 •-•• Andover , 35 49 28 34 28 33 Birmingham....,,... 56 58 30 40 16 22 33 -- Bridport 3B 50 32 36 26 30 —. 39 --- Cirencester 31 48 24 32 3", 27 40 -- Faringdon.,—....... 54 66 36 40 26 3.1 46 --- Guildford 38 54 28 35 20 39 —. 46 -- Henley 42 58 26 P',.2 23 26 43 Hereford 50 56 26 32 24 27 46 Highworth 42 60 32 42 28 34 56 Maidenhead 56 68 34 44 22 30 36 3 7 —•-••• M0nm0uth—........... 33 42 2P, 34 22 30 St Reading . 30 58 '22 36 28 32 • 40 Salisbury--....—.. 36 50 30 33 23 28 36 45 -- Southampton 54 .% . :3 33 40 28 32 -- 42 Stroud .. 35 44 28 36 20 24 46 -- -- Tewkesbury - 36 26 22 32 40 -- 42 Uxbridge 40 48 28 32 17 28 40 -- Wastage 3`) 57 24 30 19 32 34 42 Warminster 32 62 28 36 24 27 34 40 -0 59 21 22 35 -- -- Worcester--...._ 36 48 30 32 24 29 LEWES MARKET.—Sept. 22. ti Per Quarer. s. d. to s. d. Per Quarter. a. d. Wheat,White ...32 0 40 0 I Oats 2O Li -1 LEWES MA; Per Qum*: er. s. d. to s. d. Wheat, White ... 32 0 40 0 Oat Red l9. 0 26 0 Pea Barley 3l 0 33 0 Oil .2. cs.r. s. d 20 0 31 0 t s..per t* 2 s• • 1 6 :31 •housand" ise ......, Cake.... 11/. CIIELTENHA Per Bushel. s. d. to s. d Wheat Barley Oats 26 36 Beans . 5 6 6 0 Pease 5 0 6 0 Hay 3/. 10s. M MARKETS. to Pet lb. Beef 6 61 / Minton 6 1 Veal • A 5 Pork Lamb to 4/. Os. Od. per ton. HULL MARKET.—Sept. 622. 37e. Wheat, Old 365. 3Ss. 40s, New 33s 35 5 . ~• . .....s -- Foreign —s. —s. —s. In bond... —s. --''' Oats, Poland 2os `ls. '9s. Old 22i. 245. •-•- . ,: -- Small or Feed.... —s. Bs. '2os —S. ....s 05. -- Foreign —s. —. —s —., --5 . ..."'' 2ls• Barley, Norf. & Suf. ... 185. 19s 21s. Line. & Wold —.... Js• ... . s , --.Foreign .....— -- g-- ‘• 6. Beans 365. 87s. 381. Foreign ...... ... —',. --s• -- Pease, White........ 34s. 36 -s.3s• s. Ws. Grey 0 341. Tares „... s —s. —s. Foreign ...... . Free, per last 301. 3 ,,_)it ' S. Rapeseed. in bond none• LIVERPOOL CORN EXCHA NG '-:'.. _sept, 22. c, f , 6 4 WilitAT, English, White, per 701 b. 6, al to 6 Red . ... , 5 9 6 . Scotch, Welch, and Manx ..:, .... 5 3 5 1 liish, White 5 4 5 , ------ Red .. 4 0 6 Foreign ()xis, English, Welsh, and Scotch, per• 4511, 2lO , 2 10 Irish Foreign BARLEY, English, M , .. h .nig, per np. quarter 10 0 4 0 Scol':;0 and Irish, per 6011.r 3 ~ .• P/ - F.,..eding .1 BEANS, P.41511',1), per Imperial qv .trter 42 0 6 0 Irish, &c. i ; --. Foreign 40 PLARIt., English, per I inperizi quarter 3B 0 , 0 .---- Foreign FI/ouit, English, per 280111. ,--- Irish OATMEAL, English and Irish, per ..)401bs 22 0 '' . , 2 0 INLIAN CORM, per 4401 , 4 • Rye, per Imperial quarter 32 0 ~6 0 MALT, per Imperial quarter IMPORT OF GRAIN for the Week ending Sept. 2 1 ..,troe 3tj' Wheat. Oats. Barley Flour. "" 1.0. 6 Om Qrs. Qrs. Foreign, llrls.l Irish, &c. Scks 4 ,04 6317 6,313 i 497 9i 5 1 2,(5;8 MEETINGS OF CREDITORS TO-MORR 6W , A :tti l ''' R. Clements, builder, Upper Berkeley -street West ................••.. 9 1.2 .1. Cantellow, plasterer, Brownlow-street, Holborn ..................... 1 4. Roberts, floor-cloth-manufacturer, Farringdon-street IL V.T. J. Potter, victualler, Little Compton-street, Soho ................ , W. Ayling, chemist, Great Portland.street, Marylebone .......... The Great Sheep Fair for the county of SiissO` vg a s s held at Lewes on Monday, and a more inauspic%ous d r of regards the weather, we never witnessed. OPI r- f ue ," 50,000 sheep were penned, but not more than. a thir", —„bsc purchasers. Prices varied from 15s. to 2`Gs, for 1-'°-tbe and from 225. to 345. for Ewes. For W ether Sil ec A P trade was exceedingly dull. There was a large at tenuAl of farmers and flock masters. CADVERTISENA NT . .00 (1 • POWER F.O L MUSICAL BOXES, in cases, 12 inches long, by 5 inches wide, each playing F'p e r re d with the music finished in a very superior manner, are ° Five Guineas each. Also a few of the same description , Airs, price Seven Guineas each, at T. Cox SAvolx' 9, oi lo1) . Silversmith, Goldsmith, and Watch ma k er , 47, Cornhill, L e ning N. B. The small musical boxes, :4 inches long,' continua : t ay. in tin cases, price 19s. each, or in composition shell cases, each. BIRTHS. Sir V' On the 23d ult., at Strinige, near Stockholm, the lady C. Disbrowe, his Majesty's Minister at the Court of Sl"' a son. vi al e ' On the 22d inst., at Hampstead, the lady of HerturA :ger Esq O ., of a son. SOL ° n the 22d inst., in Contlai: tg ht-terrace, tle l a dy of G. Hayter, Esq., of a son. On the 23d inst., ir, Devonshire-ow_, M rs. Robert r rederici Gower, of a son, Mc g ' On the 19th inst., at Mount Nod, Streatham, SONY, Cunninha, f a son. u gle On th g e 22 m d inst., the lady of R. S. Ch am b e rs, Eq.) f —n ° street, of a daughter. On the 22d inst., i n U prer Wi mpo l e-stree t, th e lady of F. Mitchell, Esq., of a son On the 18th inst. *m J ohn Cliffor d , 1 3 1 t.eet °f rs. a ace- s , a daughter. MA PRIED. 44 On the 2.11 inst., at Cheltenham, Lesley Alexander, .::,(1;1611. York-terraee, Regent's-park, London, and Foyle-park , '''') of tiliveal2lelrs,t Bart, of RegimentN Newport, pDo'rrat,goo countyns derry, to Amelia Maria, daughter of Lieut.-Colonel Bates, a " rt i re d On the 14th inst., at St. Helen's-Chraurch, York, 3 ' l -* Alf farY Shaw, son of the late John Shalw, b' t to 3 liss 3 aw, Esq., are itec , Postans, of Lee, Kent. ~,„ I On the 23d inst , atEd on William Henry Bart'Jn , '''' of daughter the Royal Mint, inst ., HenrimetotnatHUntcrMushet, third ,anTdipgpreandry-d.aughter to Sir E. 01). the late Robert Mushet, Esq., of Millfield House, Edmonton. On the 22d inst., at Brigh to n, Mary, wife of Chas. Gibbe s, 4 E t he , On the 20th inst., at Co rs bi e N. 8., Horatio , onl y son eli late Lieut.-General the H on . Si ; Wm. Stewart, 146;. London : Printed and Publi s hed by MURDO YOUNG , o ft 112, Strand, at The S ue Offi c e, No. 112, Strand, in the "'- of Middlesex. T UNI' de he next, as ma and 1 lh Ap Th ril No treat) him, Ev Lem utiral eng a4 of 10 Act Sliar Lon(