The Sun. — London, England, 1835-03-26 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF T.HE PUBLIC JOURNALS. A very childish note of exultation over the Govern ment appears to have been raised by the Opposition papers of yesterday, because of the adverse division of the day preceding in the House of Commons on the 'motion of Mr. Hodges for an inquiry into the conduct of Colonel . Tremenheere, of the Marines. This officer, it will be recollected, had, soon after the late election for Chatham, issued a garrison order prohibit ing the indiscriminate admission of slop-sellers into the barracks. The Hon. Mover of the inquiry into Colonel Trcmenheere's conduct grounded his motion on the two facts—first, of that officer having in pri vate conversation, and before the election, expressed a strong opinion 'as to the manner in which Govern ment ought to visit on the town of Chatham the defeat of the Ministerial candidate ; second, of his having. after the election, limited the privilege of selling slop in the barracks to three persons, selected in accordance ith that feeling of political preference. The gallant officer, as was stated by Sir E. Knatchbull, wished ino.ss anxiously for a full investigation of his conduct ; ant the Right Hon. Baronet, on hearing the sentiments other Gentlemen upon the subject, acceded withou difficulty to the proposed inquiry. \ Indeed, from tht petition of Colonel Tremenheere to the House, would appear that a studied and erroneous colourins had been affixed to the Gallant Officer's conduct. He states that the purport of his private conversation, previous to the election, was merely that Chatham by opposition to the Government "might prejudice its interests, and deprive itself of the peculiar benefits which have often resulted to ports circumstanced as Chatham, from the protection and patronage of the State." There was no threat in this language, nor any remark of a different nature from what might na turally have been uttered by an indifferent person. So with regard to the subsequent conduct of Colonel Tremenheere, the petition' states positively that the three parties excepted from the general prohibition to enter the barracks, were chosen after a careful inquiry into their characters; that two of them were not voters for Chatham, and one was an active supporter of Mr. Byng Moreover, a fully sufficient reason for pre venting the indiscriminate access of Jew slop-sellers to the barracks at that period was to be found in the fact of there being then in the barracks men who had recently disembarked, and others daily expected from fo reign stations, when, asat all other such times, they were peculiarly exposed to fraud and extortion on the part of slop-sellers, and in want of whatever protection could be afforded them by the vigilance of the autho rities in command of the barracks. There were here, as most people might be ready to allow, quite motives enough to make Colonel Tremenheere desirous of a searching inquiry into his conduct. Why Sir Robert Peel differed from Sir E. Knatchbull as to the expediency of, a full investigation, embracing the whole case whereon the motion of Mr. Hodges rested, can be no otherwise explained than by sup posing that the Right Hon. Baronet felt the hardship of such a precedent as might be established, by making private conversation the subject of Parliamentary in quisition, and therefore resolved upon the most manly part of resisting so much of the original proposition as touched the extraofficial and merely individual sen timents of the gallant officer. And.let us ask, had even the words insisted on (misrepresented as the petition describes them to have been) been proved in the most incontrovertible manner, what purpose would it, have served ? Would it have convicted Colonel Tremen heere of violating the freedom of election ? Would it have afforded even the slightest pretext or colourable ground for charging him with such malpractice ? We are satisfied that Sir Robert Peel looked no further than to the unconstitutional precedent which was threatened by an outrage upon individual freedom of speech ; and had he considered the question as of one party, or involving the influence and ascendancy of the Government, it is clear that he would have secured a stronger attendance of its supporters than was ex hibited'on the division. The briskness of the Oppo sition journals on such a victory is a decided symptom of conscious rottenness.—Times. The Chancellor of the Exchequer endeavoured to draw from Lord John Russel, last night, the nature of the resolution he intended to propose on Monday. The Right Hon. Baronet, having pretty well ex hausted his liberal stores, is now abOut to enter oh his great work, the defence of the greatest blot in our institutions, the existence of a Sinecure Protestant Church for a Catholic population. If we wish that the desire of a Repeal of the Union should be extin guished in the breasts of the people of Ireland, we must put an end to all odious distinctions between Ca tholics and Protestants. The question whether there ought to be any Established Church in Ireland, is one respecting which opinion may be divided ; but if There must be an Established Church, the principle on which alone Establishments have hitherto been justi fied, ought to be acted on in that country. It was laid down by Warburton, that the State ought always to be in alliance. with that religion which is professed by the majority ; and when a religion ceases to be professed by the majority, it ought on that account to be abandoned by the State for a new alliance. The existence of a Church in a country to which the great majority of the people are alien, proves in itself, either that the minority are toasters, and the majority slaves, or that another nation uses the minority as instruments for coercing the majority. Englishmen of the present day affect to deprecate the idea of treating Ireland as a conquered country. But on what principle, we would ask, can a Protestant Church be imposed on a Ca tholic population, but conquest ? No people would voluntarily 'submit to such an insult as an establish ment of an alien religion among them. Let English men ask themselves, as Lord Howick well observed, with what feelings they would view a Catholic Esta blishment imposed on themselves by a Parliament sit ting in Dublin, of which four-fifths of the Members were Catholics ? Protestants very naturally think their own religion the best ; but they must sup pose that the Catholics equally believe in the superiority of their religion. If an Englishman conceives it would, be an insulting mark of his degrada tion to see a dominant Catholic Church imposed on him, he cannot conceive that an Irishman would view a Protestant Church imposed on him with any other feeling. The Irish Catholic, therefore, is justi fied in viewing the Protestant Church with detesta tion, as an evidence of his bondage, because voluntary submission to an insult would suppose him to be without the spirit of a man. The question of the ap propriation of Irish Tithes is, therefore, very properly connected with the permanent settlement of Tithes. All are agreed that Tithes are the property of the pub lic, and ought to be dedicated to objects of national benefit. But the establishment of a Church, which is detested by six-sevenths of the population, and which is consequently the cause of constant agitation, and vio lence, and bloodshed, cannot be a national benefit, and the sooner its days are numbered the better will it be for all parties. Too long hay England wasted its resources in perpetuating dissentions in Ireland. The speech of Sir Henry Hardinge, admitting unecinivo cally the utter inability of Government to enforce the law, is a sufficient proof that we have already reached a point in abuse which cannot be passed with impunity. The system of governing by means of ascendancy— that is, by means of a section of a nation, maintained by British money and British bayonets, to tyrannize over the majority of their countrymen, must now be abandoned 'for ever. Orange Societies, as the emana tions of the accursed system of ascendancy, ought to be scouted by every liberal Englishman. - Before we complain of the Catholics, let us do justice to them. Let us destroy all motive for the people of Ireland wishing to separate from us, and then we may depend on it that the words " Repeal of the Union will cease to be heard.—Morning Chronicle. The Registration of Voters' Bill was read a second time last night in the House of Commons. We cannot say that we see much reason to congratulate the public on such a result. This Bill was brought in by Lord John Russell and Sir John Campbell foe the more effectual registration of voters in England and \Vales 's to serve in Parliament. Without at all attribute to the above Hon. Members al! of the Bill, we have no hesitation in de considering the ample discussion and en the part of the Reform Act relating to on of voters has undergone, and the full of discovering its defects, which three ember: i- - 7 - ei to 0 , e ... A • - '' ; 0 ors ', L a, hash t„,Z, ~ T - • NI • • lat gat' c„.4 ,1 , ,7; (At t li k .IC ... :, • aria , ~ . -4 lAy. 1 `?"."\ '-`N.,, ears' registration has afforded, a more meagre or more imperfect production was never laid upon the table of the House of Commons. Though we express so strong stn opinion upon the general character of the Bill, we do not, of course, contend that none of the defects are Attempted to be remedied. The improvements, how .3er, introduced by this Bill may, we fear, be summed ip in a very few lines. The first provision -we find s certainly an improvement—we mean that which provides that the Clerks of the Peace of the se veral counties should, at a stated period, issue their warrants to the High-Constables, who are then to for xard plain and specific instructions fcr making out the lists of voters, with copies of the necessary parts of the register for the time being (previously obtained from 'he Clerks of the Peace) to the overseers of the parishes within their districts. This provision, so clearly called i'or—the inefficiency of the overseers alone without as ..istance being by all acknowledged—will doubtless save much expense and trouble. Through the same officers the Clerk of the Peace and the High Consta ile's notice of the holding of the various Courts of re vision is to be forwarded to the respective parishes; and, 9erhaps, we may add to the above improvements the Jiscretionary power given to the revising barrister of awarding costs in all cases of either frivolous and vexa :ious objections or claims being made before him. We also find a declaratory enactment as to the mode of as certaining the distance of a voter's residence _from the polling-place, which is to be by the nearest mode of access by any public road or footway, and not as the crow flies, as some of the learned revisers held to be the most convenient and reasonable method to adopt, though contrary to the principle generally laid down by the Court of king's Bench in similar cases. But, of !another point, in itself more important—viz., the right of trustees, not having any beneficial interest, to vote in respect of their trust property, no notice is taken. Though, perhaps, the majority of decisions, in accord ance with the intention - of the framers, as well as the spirit of the Act, has been against the claim of such persons ; yet surely, when it is borne in mind in how many instances such claims were allowed, some enact ment will be considered desirable. We shall not pre tend to drag our readers through the tedious discussion of the mere verbal defects and technical blunders con tained in this Bill, looking upon it solely in a legal point of view, and for which we arc aware the intro ducers of the Bill are scarcely considered liable ;—but for the principles of it we do not consider them liable ; and we therefore do regret to find that a Bill introdu ced by such persons should still contain a provision that the payment of rates and taxes should be a con dition precedent to a voter having his name placed upon the register. To showthat this has not occurred through inadvertence, we . find a clause declaring that the payment of the rates for 12 months immediately preceding shall be sufficient. Upon the glaring ab surdities of such provisions as the following, we are sure we need make no comment. Such as the calling upon objectors to prove prima facie cases of objec tion, and to declare upon their notice the ground of their objections, beyond which the Barrister is to have no jurisdiction to examine or adjudicate ; so that, to say nothing of requiring an objector to prove a nega tive, should an ignorant objector, such as an overseer, to whom so much is left, and in fact required in this way, make an objection, not tenable perhaps from his mode of stating it, ye , , notwithstanding it may appear, in,the course of the investigation, that the voter has foi other reasons no sufficient interest in the premises for which he may claim, the Barrister will have no power to expunge such name from the lists. And by another provision, still more absurd, to the effect that the qualification of a voter which has been once objected to, and the objection to which has been disallowed, shall not be again brought un der the cognizance of the Barrister, unless the vote shall have been disputed before a Committee of the House of Commons and the decision of the Barrister thereon overruled, the name of such a person, though not qualified, must remain, at any rate, upon the re gistry, till a scrutiny (no frequent event) may happen to be called before the House of Commons. The ready mode of manufacturing false votes by wholesale, sug gested by such an enactment, we need not point out. The only consolation we feel is that some of the de fects alluded to are so gross, that it is perfectly impos sible that they can pass through the Houses of Parlia ment without being detected. We have only professed to give here some of the most striking deficiencies of the Bill in question ; and, considering the principle of registration established by the Reform Act, and the consequent shortening of elections, as a very great be nefit, we cannot but sincerely, and in the most friendly spirit, recommend the withdrawal of the present Bill, and the introduction of one after the Easter recess, more extended and liberal in principle, and more per fect, or rather less inaccurate in its details. From the observations made by different members last night, it is evident that the Bill will encounter much resistance in the Committee. Indeed, our expectation is, that the difficulty of adapting it by any process to public advantage will cause it to be rejected altogether in that stage.—Morning Herald. Lord Brougham, on presenting a petition in the Lords on Monday night, took a very just and com prehensive view of the public—the national—advan tage, of newspapers, and the consequent itnpolicy of newspaper stamps. The petition was for the abolition of this heavy and impolitic impost ; and it was signed. by Professor Southgate, Dr. Birkbeck, Mr. Grote, and many other well-informed, public-spirited, and influential individuals ; and Lord Brougham took occasion to observe, that among other illustrious cha racters who had borne their testimony to the public value of newspapers, the great moralist, Paley, stood conspicuous. Lord Brougham might have added, that the public spirit, and the concert of sentiment and action which make this country at present so perfect an exemplification of the bundle of rods, has been effected by the newspaper press. We are far from undervaluing science or literature, in their more voluminous and slow-going forms ; but it would be not merely false modesty, but absolute injustice to blink the fact, that the newspaper press is the caul both of freedom and of intelli gence ; and if these be more established and prized, and productive of better effects now, than they were in former times, the press is the grand engine. It is the tocsin in attack, the sword in combat, and the trumpet in victory. In fact, if we trace to its origin any thing which is liberal in spirit, useful to the public in practice, or cheering to our hopes, in the whole po litical system of the country, we shall say that the real origin of it is the press. The public are more indebted to the press than to those men who fight the battles of the people in the Senate ; for but for the publicity which the press gives them, they might as well address the winds and the waves, as their political opponents in the Houses of Parliament. The press stands over the whole as the recording Angel ; and he who but for it would be speaking to those who are as deaf as the adder, speaks to all the people of England, and they re-echo the words of the advocate of their cause, and make his voice to be heard. Hence we get all our good measures by means of the press ; and, we may add, that the press is the real source of our patriotic men—it gives them a reward which, from its very nature, is dearer to good men than any - other, and one which nothing but the press could be stow—it gives them, during life, that fame upon the mere hope of which alone patriotic men must depend where there ia.no public press, and it gives this fame from the whole people, and therefore without any taint of party. Look at all the liberal men who now advo cate the people's cause in both Houses of Parliament; look especially at the majority of the Commons, and say what they would, what they could have done, but for the newspaper press ; look at the lingering and fading remains of those who are still hostile to the people in their hearts, and say what they would not have a' 011 e had it not been for this ready and powerful instrument of liberty and liberality ? In order to as certain which of the means of enlightenment has been the real cause of any improvement, either in the spirit of the r.people, or in the public institutions of the country, we have only to find the one which has kept pace in the improvement ; and where can we look with so much satisfaction as to the Press? We had science and literature, in their formal shape, in times of the thickest political darkness; and although both have been more 'diffused among the people than formerly, there has not been of late years any THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY, _MARCH 26, 1835. there was money in the house, and they would have it. TheyZentered the bedroom, .and one of them struck her uncle a vio'ent blow on the side of the bead with a bat ; he fell in consequence of it across a chest. She opened the window and cried out, but no', one was passing to hear the alarm. The house not being near any Wier she did not think the cry would be heard, but she thought it. might attract a passer by. No one, however, heard her. She then ran down stars, and went out at the back door. A man inamedi diately came up to her, and struck her a violent blow on the side of the head, and another on the side. The man ehen fell upon her. She screamed out, and be presented a pistol at her head , anal swore he would fire if she did not hold h er tongue. He dragged her in doors, and they.went into the room of her uncle, where the three other men were engaged demanding from her uncle where. lie kept his mo ney. Her Uncle gAve them the keys of the chests where he kept gold Lnd silver. They ransacked them and desired her to be quict,aad they would not hurt her. On taking up a bag of copper, one of the men said that they did not want copper. They left the house when they had obtained all the money they could find. She then dressed her un cle's wounds and her own. She was bleeding very much :*rom both ecrs. very marked improveirsent of these matters themselves. The book of the presaut day is certainly not, upon the whole, better then it was a century ago ; but it is very different with the newspaper. That is actually a crea tion of yesterday as - it were ; and yet, rapid as has been the progress of libcality in public opinion, the news paper has kept, and still keeps, a• head of it. Nor need we wonder th at :should be the case—the news paper spreads over the, country like the light of Cie Sun ; and, like that luminary, it shines equally • upon " the just rend the unjust," showing the beauty of the one a.:; id the deformity of the other. When the vital invartance of , the newspaper press is considered, it is really monstrous to think that a newspaper should be one of the most heavily taxed of all productions. The tax is, as Lord Brougham justly remarked, 200 per rent. ; • and for this heavy tax there can be no pl , m, save that of a wish to stifle the truth. The objectionable publications arc all un stamped ; bccause„ . as his Lordship well observed, " when a man can brace his nerves to preach murder and arson, he, requires 'out little additional courage to brave the stamp laws." There is nobody understands the subject better than Lord. Brougham► ; there is no one who is better able to plead its cause ; and, there fore, now that he has - leisure to attend to such matters, we hope he 'will not confine his exertions to the mak ing of a speech, 'however brilliant -and to the purpose, on the presenting of a petition, but press the matter home to the busLitess and bosoms - of the public. — Morning Advertiser. e . Last night in thte House of - Commons the Premier put a very prOper 'question to Lord John Russell, to which lie received. - an answer, not conveying the in formation sought, but imparting, with somewhat more than Lhe noble respondent's usual distinctness, im portant information of a very different kind. The Right Hon. Baronet wished to know if the Noble Lord would be :prepared on Friday to state to the ' House the outline s of the resolution he meant to 'pro pose on Monday - next. The answer seems to us so very remarkable, considering all the circumstances of the case, that we cannot deny ourselves the pleasure of transcribing it here:-- i " Lord Jobn Russell said that all he could then answer was that he could give no answer to the ,- . ..ht Hon. Baronet's question—( Hear, and u laugh)—as he - . not expect such .a question from him. Ile could not tell wat the resolutions might be.—( Hear, bear, from ' the Ministerial benches.) However, he would be prepared to give an answer on Friday." It is certainly odd that Lord John Russell should not only be unable now to give an outline of resolu tions of which his metice has been on the paper of the House for a fortnight or thereabouts ; which are to come on in five days from the present time ; and which are to be of so much importance, we are told, that their fate must decide that of-the Administration ; but that the Noble Lord should be unable so much as to say whether it is likely he shall have it in his power on Friday next, being, only three days prior to that on which these redoubtable resolutions are to be moved, to state what w ill be their general character. Lord John cannot, as it seems to us, have any very definite idea as to what he intends to .move on Monday next, or any very fixed purpose to move anything whatever. We have' bad repeated instances during the present Session to prove that the prospective paper of the House of Commons is a very unmeaning document, but no thing has yet occurred to cast so much ridicule upon this senatorial catalogue of announcements as this indirect confession of the leader of the Opposition that he has put down a notice of his intention to move something or other, on a given day, upon a subject of so much interest as the Irish ChCrch, in the fond hope that during the interval some inspiration might be imparted to him to fix his wavering and un settled mind as to what that something should be. The desired inspiration, it appears, has not yet de scended, and there is much probability, after all, that we may be left without resolutions of any kind on Monday. The reply of the leader of the Opposition . indicates on his part a happy vacancy of mind, which must be in the highest degree satisfactory to such of his followers as perform the task or enjoy the privilege of prompting him. The Noble Lord, after this pub lic acknowledgment that he is . still quite open to the suggestions of his friends, will probably have prompters , enough - and we own we should not be much b sur prised if they were to prompt so clamorously, and at the same time so discordantly, that the Noble leader ' should, between this and Monday evening next, be compelled once more to betake himself to the refuge of a general meeting at Lord Lichfield's. The idea of another rendezvous in St." James's-square will, we" know, terrify our Whig and Radical contempor arie s. But such an occurrence, attended with consequences as before, is very probable nevertheless. —Morning Post. COURT OF CHANCERY. SANDERSON V. WALKER. The question in this motion turned on the construction to be placed on an order of Lord Brougham, which was inconsistent with a previous order. After a protracted discussion between Mr. KTNDER SLEY in support of the order, and Sir W. HORNE against it, The LORD CHANCELLOR said the orders must be drawn up according to the construction which the Registrar put on his minutes, and if afterwards there was such an incon sistency in them that they could not be acted upon, then a further application could be made to the Court. HUTCHINSON V. WRAY. This was a motion on the part of th - e - defendant to set, aside an order of the Vice-Chancellor, directing him to de liver up all the books and papers in his possession to the clerk in Court. The parties are surgeons and apothecaries, carrying on a partnership business in Farringdon-street. In In 1832 they quarrelled. Wray filed a bill to dis solve the connection. The bill was dismissed, and the defendant having since carried on business on the partnership account at his house in Salisbury square the plaintiff obtained the order for the in spection of his books, and for their being deposited in the Court. The Defendant now contended that this order- was productive of great inconvenience to him, as it compelled him to come to Chancery-lane, and pay 6s. Bd. for a sight of his own books, before he could examine a recipe, or make out a customer's bill. He proposed, therefore, to de posit the books in the hands of Mr. Mason, of Fleet-street, or any other mutual friend. Mr. KINDERSLEY supported the motion, and Sir W. HORNE opposed it. The LORD CHANCELLOR said it was much to be regretted that the partis could not come to an amicable settlement of their disputes, but the Vice-Chancellor's order must be affirmed, and as that was a matter which should not have been the subject of an appeal motion, it must be affirmed with costs. SURREY SESSIONS. TIII7 INDIAN CIIIEF.—A7 true bill was on Tuesday evening returned by the Grand Jury against Jlztk Coonse, the Indian Chief, who was lately performing at the Victoria Theatre, for an assault on a child named Morton, and yes terday an application was made by Mr. Chambers, on the part of the prosecution, tlrat the defendant, who is out on bail, should be at liberty to enter fresh bail for his ap pearance. Mr. Gale of the Victoria Theatre said, the Chief was not present, but his bail would surrender him any time the Court ordered ; he was prepared with fresh bail. - Mr. CHAMBERS prayed that the names of the bail should be given to Mr. nobler, the solicitor the prose cution. _ _ _ . Mr. Gale had no objection to mention their names, he said Sir Augustus D'Este, Dr. Boulton, and Dr. Hodg kinson, would be bail for the Chief, and would attend any time the Court appointed. Tile residences of the proposed bail were handed to Mr. Hobler, and it was arranged that the Chief should be rendered into custody ; and that the bail should attend to-morrow to sign the necessary recognizances. The trial will take place on the 2d . of April, at the Central Crimi nal Court. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. HOME CIRCUIT.-LEIVES, MARCH' 25. CROWN COURT. Alexander ,S'ireeler, aged 28, and James Tesler, 24, were indicted for burglariously breaking and entering the dwell ing-house of Thomas Reed, on the night of the 26th of Fe bruary last. at Ewhurst. Elizabeth Spilstead, the niece of the prosecutor, w ho is an old man between 86 and 87 years of age, lived with her uncle as housekeeper. No person lived in the house but themselves. On the night of the 26th of February last, they went to bed about eight o'clock, having first secured all the doors and windows.. About one in the morning she was awoke by hearing a noise on the staifcase.- She opened her door and saw a light. She immediately went into her uncle's bedroom and awaked him. He got up, and went to the bedroom door. He there saw three men standing, one of them had a dark lantern. They said they knew Elizabeth Spiistead swore positively to the prisoner Streeter being the man who had struck her, and also swore to Tester having his face blackened. Two of the men had their faces blackened ; and she could swear as positively to the other man, but he had not yet been apprehende:i. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Sentence de ferred. MIDLAND CIRCUIT.-LEICESTER, MARCH 24. HIGHWAY ROBBERY.—Peter Norman, aged 26, was put to the bar, charged with having, on the King's highway, violently assaulted Thomas Fletcher Humfrey, and taken from his person a purse containing 3/. 3s. 6d. Mr. DANIEL conducted the prosecution.- The jury returned a verdict of Guilty. • WEDNESDAY, MARCH 25.—The prisoner having been brought into Court this morning the CHIEF JUSTICE, after a few judicious observations, sentenced him to be trans- ported for life. OXFORD ClRCUlT.—Smummunr, Mown 20. WILTON V. WEBSTER, M.D. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD said that this was an action for criminal conversation, which was a case of no common sorrow and no common guilt, as since this action was corn tnenced, the party who was the victim of the defendant's seduction had descended to the grave. The plaintiff be longed to a class of society which had as much virtue as any class of persons in the kingdom. He was in a highly respectable business, he being a mercer and draper, long established in this town. In 1815 he married Miss Hughes, the grand-daughter of a highly-respectable banker, she being 20 years of age and the plaintiff 29. Their union was blessed by three children, one of whom only survived, and they lived most happily together, as became persons in their station in life. The defendant, Dr. Webster, was a gentleman most respectably connected, he being the son of the late High Sheriff of the Isle of Anglesey ; and he, about three or four years before the time in question, came to reside in this town, and in 1831 he was called in to at tend the child of the plaintiff, but it was not till March, 1831, that Mr. Wilton became the patient of the defen dant; when he advised the plaintiff to remove his residence from his house of business in this town, and reside in a cottage at a small distance from the town. At this place the defendant, from his profession, had constant access to this lady, and in August, 1831, he advised the plaintiff to leave the cares of business for a time, and to take a tour, the principal part of which was in Scotland, and on foot. While on this tour the plaintiff received two letters from his wife. The Learned Sergeant read the following letters : " August 24, 1833. "My dearest George, —I think you will be astonished when I tell you I left Ellesmere on Wednesday last, at 10 minutes past 10. There is punctuality for you ; I have seen the doc tor, and when I told him when Henry returned, he said he hoped you would not do so, as he was afraid the time was too ; short to give the journey a f a i r t r i a l he would advise you to remain out longer. I l ong to hear from yewhow you bore the voyage ; the wend Was tremendously high. Our dear boy is very well ; he often asks for his papa.—Adieu, my dearest George, and that you may return with better health, is the sincere wish of your ever affectionate wife, " Mr. Wilton Post Of f ice, Edinburgh. " ELIZA WILTON." " Thursday Evening. " My dearest George,—You do not know what pleasure your letter gave me, as I was not expecting one this morning. I am glad to hear you are better, and so much pleased with your journey. I wish I was with you. I was in great trouble on Sunday last, our dear boy was so unwell. I sent for the doctor, and he was very kind and attentive. Do not be frightened about him, as I think he seems quite himself to day.—Again adieu, my dearest George ; accept my kindest love, and well wishes for your safe return to me, and believe me ever your affectionate wife, " Mr. Wilton, Post Office, Glasgow. " ELIZA WILTON." It was (continued the Learned Sergeant) while the plaintiff was on this tour, which the defendant had thus recommended, that the defendant effected his guilty pur poses with respect to the wife of the plaintiff, and on one evening the suspicions of one of the servants being aroused by the defendant remaining till near twelve o'clock, the servant was induced to listen, when she heard a noise as of a struggle, and she heard the defendant say, " You drive me distracted ; there is no one I love like you," and the plaintiff's wife then said, " If George Wilton were to die you would not take me," and the defendant replied that be certainly would. Indeed, there could be no doubt as to the facts, as the confession of the defendant ,would be given in evidence. The plaintiff returned from Scotland in the month of September, and the defendant proposed to take the first floor of the plaintiff's house in the town, which the plaintiff agreed to—and soon afterwards reports began to arise which were unfavourable to the character of the defendant and to the honour of the plaintiff's wife, and the mode which the defendant took to lull the plaintiff into a supposed security was to go at once to the plaintiff and tell him of the reports, and in the most solemn manner to contradict them ; and so satisfied was the plaintiff of the truth of the defendant's representations that he allowed him to occupy the first floor of the house for business, the plaintiff's wife still residing in the cottage. However, in April following the cottage was given up by the plaintiff and the plaintiff's wife came to reside at the plaintiff's house in the town, and from that time the defendant not only lodged in the house, but boarded with the family. Still the plaintiff had no sus picions, and when the health of- the plaintiff's wife began seriously to decline, she was attended by the defendant as her physician, and her husband watched over her with the most unremitting care. Mrs. Wilton became gradually worse, and being on what turned out to be her dying bed, she appeared for several days to be very uneasy—and one morning she desired that the servants should leave the room, which they did, and she then confessed that for about thirteen months the plaintiff had been dishonoured by his friend. The plaintiff sunk almost senseless on the bed, and Mrs. Wilton desired that Dr. Webster should be sent for ; he was sent for and came, and Mrs. Wilton then said to him that she had kept the guilty secret thus long, but that she could not go out of this world without making a confession of all that bad occurred. The de fendant said that he would make any sacrifice, and left the room. For some time the plaintiff remained in a state of stupefaction, but in a few hours his feelings were aroused even to phrensy, and he went up stairs to the room where Dr. Webster was, and was heard to say, " No parleying—get out of my house," and Dr. Webster, who had gone to bed, got up and left the house. The plaintiff then called in another medical man, and consulted his friends as to what he should do. They advised that the plaintiff should submit his case to the consideration of a Jury, and in December, a few days before the unfortunate lady departed from this world, the present action was com menced. It appeared from a part of the evidence in this case, that a lady named Broome, who had broken off her acquaintance with Mrs. Wilton, in consequence of the re ports which had been circulated, and that this lady had written a letter to the wife of the plaintiff, which did Mrs. Broome infinite credit, asking a renewal of their friendship. This letter was answered by Mrs. Wilton, and she coldly declined the proffered friendship of Mrs. "Broome. This answer would be receivable in evidence against the defen dant ; as the draft of this letter, in the hand-writing of the defendant, was found after the death of this unfortunate lady. It might be said that the plaintiff had no need of a suit for a divorce, as this lady was now no more. Was it to be allowed that the defendant should avail himself of that fatal catastrophe and of the sanctity of the grave ? The certificate of the plaintiff's marriage was put in. It took place in August, 1835 Mr. Donaldson said—l am a carver and gilder, in this town . I knew the plaintiff and his wife. Myself and my wife were in the habit of visiting them. I never saw any persons more happy or more comfortable than they ap peared to be. I considered the plaintiff a most indulgent mall, and his wife a most affectionate woman, Cross-examined by Mr. MAULE—The plaintiff is forty five or fifty. His wife was a person who had a great flow o f spirits, and she might be about thirty but from her hav ing bad health, she might not be so old as she looked. Other evidence was adduced ; after which the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff.—Damages, .5001. NORTHERN CIRCUIT.—LANcAsncn. John Stainton, aged 49, formerly a Curate at a village near Ulverston, was charged with having, at Dalton, forged and counterfeited a deed, purporting to convey certain property at Page Bank, with i n t ent to d e f rau d J o h n Fa zakerley. In July, 1834, an elderly individual, named Pemberton, residing on property which he owned at Page Bank, died, and a while afterwards the prisoner claimed succession to the estate under a will which he held. The property, how ever,is held under the manor of Placid Turners, the Duke of Buccleuch being Lord, and it is a local custom that property not obtained by purchase cannot be devised with out a - deed of surrender. The prisoner, therefore, in addi tion to a will, counterfeited also a deed of surrender, which, .dike the will, was attested by parties now dead ; and he also made the customary affidavit at the Registrar's office in Lancaster, which combined frauds would have had the effect of excluding - from the property, valued at 3,000/., the real heir, Mr. Fazakerley, the prisoner having made himself residuary legatee under this forged will. The cir cumstance most strongly in proof of the forgery was- the fact, that tl,ough the deed bore date in February of 1830, the stamp wth which the prisoner had provided himself was dated in the February of 1832. The prisoner was found Guilty, and sentenced to be transported 'or life, and placed in the second class of con victed felons ab o•u!. Roger 11 7 1,,t -head, of Liverpool, attorney, convicted last week of forging a mortgage deed, received a similar sen tence. John Collier, 22, was also sentenced for having forged a cheque for .50/., to be transported for life, and to rank in the second class of convicted labourers. WESTERN CIRCUIT—ExErvn, MARCH 21 Jane Taylor was charged with having maliciously set fire to a dwelling house in the possession of her husband, with intent to defraud the Norwich Union Insurance Company ; and John Taylor, her husband, was charged with procuring and . abetting her to set fire to the same. Afcer other facts which went to support the charge, had been deposed to, several witnesses gave the prisoners a good character. Verdict—Not Guilty, in which Mr. Baron GURNEY ex pressed his concurrence. EXTRAORDINARY FRACAS. Yesterday Major William Byrne .xi'as brought before the Bench of the l3rcntford Petty Sessions by one of the mounted patrol, on a warrant, ciiargina- him with having desperately assaulted Lord Montford on Sunday last. The assault having been committed at noonday on the high road, the greatest interest was excited at. Harwell, Southall, and the surrounding neighbourhood, to hear the investigation ; and on the Magistrates taking their seats the large room at the Three Pigeons Inn, where the petty Sessions are held, was crowded-to excess. Major Byrne was attended by Mr. FRENCH, the Bar rister. Henry Lord Montford—About one o'clock on Sunday forenoon, as be was returning towards Southall with one of his dogs from a walk on the Hayes road, observed Major Byrne come out of his garden gate and proceed in the direction of a blacksmith's shop, adjoining his premises, but before- he reached it he suddenly crossed the rogd with a stick in his hand, and, coming up to witness, said to him " What do you do about my premises you rascal ?" Wit ness answered, " Sir, I've nothing to do either with you or your premises." The defendant then shouldered him and swore " Damn you, I'il horsewhip you," at the same time striking him with the stick with all his force, and following up his blows repeatedly. Witness said " punish you for this," and proceeded on to Southall, and from thence to the house of Mr. Bailey, a Magistrate at Hanwell, where he procured a warrant. On his return to Southall Park be sent for Mr. Abingdon, a surgeon, to whom he showed - the bruises he bad received. Cross-examined by Mr. FRENCH.—The stick by which he struck was a thickish one. Witness sometimes stops opposite the defendant's house, as be is in the habit of walking that way to Ha} es and Hanwell ; but never stood gazing up at the house, and making observations. Has been on terms of intimacy with Major Byrne, to his misfortune, for he has paid dearly for it ; but for the last fifteen or eighteen months there has been enmity between them. On his oath he has never walked up to the house arm and arm with a female, for the purpose of annoyance, and on his solemn oath before God and his country, he did not lilt hii hand against or give Major Byrne any provocation. Henry Hancock and Lott Barrington; two lads residing at Southall, witnessed the assault from 'a baker's shop. about fifty yards off. Saw Major Byrne strike Lord Mont ford four times, but were not near enough to hear whether any words passsed between them. Lord Montford was on the footpath, on the opposite side of ,the road to 'Major. Byrne's residence. Mr. Thomas Abingdon, surgeon, of Hanwell, was called in to attend Lord Montford about three o'clock on Sunday seternoon. He examined his Lordship's left arm, on which he found a very severe bruise. He ordered leeches to be applied immediately. Mr. FRENCH, on the part of the defendant, rose to do away with the•atrocious appearance that had been given to the assault, which bad been neither premeditated •nor ma lignant ; but it had been provoked by a series of outrages on the part of Lord Montford towards Major and Lady Byrne, ►%Lich no Gentleman could put up with. He was in the habit of stopping before Major Byrne's house, with a female of no very reputable character, making gestures and observations, for the purpose of insulting Lady Byrne. He was in a situation to prove that Lord Montford had fre quently done so, even so far back as a year and a half ago ; and he had by a series of such wanton, deliberate, and meditated aggressions, drawn the assault upon him self. This, when proved, would, he trusted, in the eyes of the Bench, do away with the malignity of the assault. Mr. FRENCH having called witnesses, The CHAIRMAN said the defence set up by the defen dant's Counsel had proved a complete failure. There had been no evidence produced to support his assertion, th i at his Lordship had drawn the attack upon himself by his im proper conduct. He should offer no comments on the Major's conduct, but fine him in the full penalty of five pounds, which was the highest the law enabled him to Inflict. _ _ The money was immediately paid. There are a number of reports afloat as to the real origin of the quarrel. NENAGII PETTY SESSIONS. TITHE TRIAL EXTRAORDINARY. This trial, which caused intense interest, came on on Thursday before the bench of Magistrates :—Dr. Demp ster, Chairman ; Messrs. Willington and Jackson, Count D'Alton, Major Carter, &c.; Dean Holmes and Phil. Ryan, plaintiffs ; John Ryan, Conor Gleason, Thomas Gleeson, Dan Gaynor, Pat Quirk, at Leamy, and other defendants. Mr. Edward Lee, agent for plaintiffs ; Messrs. O'Brien and Grace, for defendants. he preliminary observations and debate, with regard t the informality of the summons issued to the defendants. occupied the Court for a considerable time ; at length it was ruled that they should appear, when Mr. Lee arose for the prosecution. He said ;—Your, Worship, the prisoners at the Bar stand indicted for an illegal and tumultuo;" meeting on Thursday last,when they wilfully and intentionally obstructed the Rev. Dean Holmes and his driver in the execution of a seizure for tithes, and affected an overt rescue. On the whole I contend that the case manifestly comes under the Whiteboy Act, and require informations accordingly. _ _ _ _ Major barter coincided with Mr. Lee as to the pro priety of informations under the Whiteboy Act. . Mr. J. O'BRIEN rose for the defendants : He said— Gentlemen, this is not the tribunal to decide upon tithes. I ;hall be as brief as possible, and, if I be understood, will prove that Dean Holmes had no right whatsoever to` levy tithes under the Composition Act ; and that, therefore, those persons were legally justified in opposing him and his drivers. Phil Ryan (interrupting)—l tell you, Mr. O'Brien, dat de Dean is a lay imprither—dat it is his private property, and dat no man dared take it from him.--4Laughter.l' Mr. O'BRIEN—He may be a lay impropriator for aught I care in this case, but under the Stith section of Stanley's Act, the Composition Act is repealed ; Dean HOlmes's title is, therefore, in abeyance, consequently his demands for tithe on my clients are unjust, and this Court has no rule whatever to abide by—the Court of Equity alone-can ad just it. Major Carter—l do not want •to contravene the infor mality of the summons, nbr do I want to abide by 'Compo sition Acts, nor Stanley Acts, nor -- • Mr. O'BRIEN—Do I understand, Major, you mean " nc pieta movere." • Major CARTER—Ho, ho—that is, be undisturbed the golden tenor of the law.—(Cheers.) I mean to contend, Sir, that there is no justification for men to congregate in hundreds, armed with sticks and stones, in violation of every act both social and legal, and impede the course of the law. _ _ -Mr. O'B.—What law ? The people violated no law— they were rather justified in opposing the Dean's act. ;,,,--but I perceive the bench appears not to agree with my observa tions, and therefore I desist from further remarks on• the subject.—(Great sensation in Court.) Phil. Rian called and sworn, Doctor DEMPSTER—Did you go on Tuesday last to.l'ev tithes for Dean Holmes, off the lands of Ki!more Relate to the Court what occurred ?—When I cane to the spot a number of fellows, above a hundred, oppq'sed me, and obstructed me in my business ; one man, Tom Orleeson there, said, my life should be taken. I can't identify every one of them. Pat. Kennedy sworn—Were you out last Tuesday with Dean Holmes?—l was, and saw a great number' with sticks and stones, w h o preven t e d us making :'of: men 11 - 1 e; 'sei zure ; the prisoners here were all among them. Cross-examined by Mr. O'BuIEN 2 You went- out to drive?—l did. Was there a hunt but that day?—No: Phil. Ryan—No, but dere was a hurling on purpose to wader the mob. Mr. LEE—I submit that neither Mr. o'l rieu tior Mr Grace would cross-examine witnesses. 11 , 1 r. O'BnIEN—I submit that I will. I thinkit very useful. Phil. Ryan, can you swear to the prisonerS.b eee , —l'll answer you no questions, Sir ; and turning to tl" Bench, your Worship, might I put a question to Tor, Glecson ?—Certainly. Tom Gleeson, were you in party dat day ?—Tom Glecson.—No, although you sO rc before that I was. • Ryan—Upon my oat you are . de very man dat said 01 , brains should be knocked out. (Great uproar.) Gleeson—lf your Worship pleases I'll tell you how this happened. Tuesday, you know, was a mightY we day, and my yard being sheltry, a greatdle of people fros the road side came in from the rain, when up comes . lad Phil, prancing upon his horse, and a cocked pis ht°l k, his fisht, an a long with him was Jimmy Henir, Jim Cla , r and lame County. Boys, says I, boys dont pretend to io n , that lad an his clan, let him pass on. Wid that when Ile pranced his horse up, and - capered about, do ye mind i m „ e ' he howls out, Gleeson, dats a- party party you hav e 'i never fear, I'll make you hop for it.—(Great latighter.d Come on, come on, now, says he, cocking his pishtel a n a , sthriving to put the fight on us, but we knew what he "' at, and gave him no offer your Honours. Phil Ryan—Patt Collins, I'll prove you were there. i , Collins—lf you do I'll prove you a perjurer. No , 1 ,1 Honour (turning to the Bench), I wasn't there, 1)14 I thatching a house, and my back turned to him, when I sa his capers ! ck Dr. DEMPSTER—How could you see him and your. turned? Mr. O'BRitil—'The man I suppose must have eit her been transparent, or had eyes in his poll.—;Laughter.) ~0 The case closed here. The prisoners were admitted ' bail, themselves in 20/. and two sureties for 101. eac h ''' . Limerick Times. MONTHLY RETURN OF CORN, ST BY ORDER OF THE COmmISSIuNERS OF HIS HAJE" CUSTOMS. An Account showing the. Quantities of Corn, Flour imported into the United Kingdom in toth March, 1833 ; the Quantities upon w been paid for Home Consumption during the the Quantities remaining in Warehouse at the Grain, 11 l eaL :1; 1 the Month CD s _ 'hick Duties hla same Month; close there!f>, - ^F, F:52 Z. „ C 674 E.' Fl" , C:?7 • • i; g.P 3, " •• • • : E. • iiii 1 4 ; t 7 MI lfk 7 ..; A V FE,: •P Z - 2 !! -4 • .;• lIIIic t - e• - • & .CP , ...1 ' ' ...0 t 4 .., c , 1111 / W.4., tt -. f. ....i = C I I I I 1 10 4 V 10 2 'C t. 75 F IND .`• A CA 7. r i 111 11111 8 t'' T,',', x~ --, 1 4 i = a •;•! I I • 6,4 0 0 1.... to CP sa -6 I I'l I I -• .g 0 9- e. A Ce - 5; c 7 Il wI :. _c~~xo CCPWICo.*Q - ^' By order of the Commissioners, ry• C. A. SCOVELL, Secr e t Custom-house, London, March 21, 1835. THE MARKETS. COAL MARIi Per Ton s d Adair's Bensham Main l5 6 B*adley, Stalihope, and Co l3 "0 Ch:ster M in lO 0 Felling Main l5 0 17 - Er —M,rch 25- -F. 0 Per Ton. 5 1 Walls End Gosforth ............ 9 Walls End Hotspur .......... Wits End Heaton .......... ••••• ;I 0 /9 Walls alls End Hilda ...... ...... ' End Killin v rorth ..... ' l a End Novinaren .......... 1 3 4 Walls End Pear - ........... ", Wads End 1141dclEs ........ Wall, End Walker .............. Walls End ll:addyll's ........... ; NVal: s End Helton ......... •••••4 Wang Ent Latnbt, ...... •' !•" 0/ Walls End Walls Russel's H ." 1e1011".•,)4 0 , g Nails E:id Stewart ....... W Ent; A u3.la .............. 14 5 Walls End MutterknoWl •.. 'l O P WaLs End South Durnarn•''' 10 6 ails Eud Walls EnA Selby ee sWest. .... ............... .... .. •• . ... g Walla End last market.day, 129 Dltio Reins Ord's Rea ugh l5 0 Pon top Witulsot South Hartley Tanfield IS 3 West Hartley Willington l9 t , Wylam Dixon's Butterknowl 16 6 Hoirne's Main ... l6 0 llowevnech Coal IlarOcy Field and Co Walls End Bell, Robson 4, Co 18 3 Walls End Carr and C - 9 Ships Arrived since RING THE WIO COUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING T 12. % Wheat. I Barley. Oats. Bears. ''• 1) .Per Quarter. s. to e. Is.to s. s. to a. a. t o Abingdon.....-- 54 60 3; '2:2 30 Andover 35 S 9 28 34 i 23 33 :„.; Birmingham-- 56 58 30 40 16 -- Bridport 38 .51 32 36 V; 3. Cirencester 34 49 24 82 12327 / Faringdon...—. 54 66 86 40 126 31 , .1 ( " Guikilord 33 54 128 35 2 0 :30 42 58 ;26 32 2:3 26 Hereford —,-- 50 56 20 24 27 -- Highworth 42 60 32 4:2 28 34 Maidenhead 88 68 ; '34 43 22 31 1 36 Monmouth— 32 42 j 29 31 1 122 Rca !log 30 59 22 36 28 32 qJ 36 no !30 33 23 is 36 I Southampton 54 58 i 40 i2B 32 -- Stro,,d 31 44 28 ' l6 20 40 , 1 'fewke.,,bary . 36 1 22 32 , I Uxbridge 40 48 128 32 17 l 8 .2 117 124 30 19 32 34 4 ; 0 VVarmintAer 32 52 128 36 24 27 34 3 5 " 59 21 4 0 Worcester -- 36 ' :30 32 24 21) 0 I.I•.;WES MARKET .—March !4. toy 0 Per Quar cr. a. d. to a. 0. Per Quarter. s• 6 4 ) Wheat, White ... 40 0 42 0 Oats Red .. ..... 33 0 4o 0 Pease 9, t0t .. ) ; .,./ 9. Barley 34 0 36 0 Oil Cake...ll . s- ot .1. , e Beef... ............... I'SJotton .................................... I 1 Veal ............. ••••' 0 0 Pork ... .. ....................... 0 .... CHELTENHAM MARKETS Per Bushel s. d. to s. Pei 11). Vheat Barley . 04ts Beans I'ea'v 5 0 7 0 Lamb F _ • t 4.11 31. I 5s t- 4t low I itl. HULL M A lIKET.—Mwet. 2 k fp Wheat. Old ... ......... ... Ms 375. 345. New ...... : 74 . 4 ' . .....s. :1; Foreign —a. —s. --, ......In bond... -;$ .206 '.. Oats. Poland --- Sinai! or Feed— - I' ', 78: . 2 29. tis ' ......Old ......... —l'' ' ' ' ....I. '''..- -. .....," :t , -- F•reign —S. a. —s . .....t. 3 i t ; , Barley. Norf. & Suf `2Bs f'.os. 3ls Line s, Wold 4 * li , ''-. mss.' ~ t —....••••••• Fore:go Beans l3, ;74, : 1 6. , Foreign ........ -•''' : 0 ~ Pease White.... ....s• t, Tares 3ii. 38s. 45s Grey ............ --'• ,‘,.' S. ....d . ....-S Foreig,-n ......... 04.. ItapeseM. in bond none c 0 MEETINGS OF CREDITORS AT Tarl, r oic BASINGHALL-STREET, TO-MORO- )1 , (From th • London Gazette) .... J. Ebns, bookseller, Old Bond street ..................................... ....• / it E. Parr, broker, Baldwin s-gardens, tiray's I nn- l a ne ........... „..,' W. Eccles and J. StAlman, tailors, Hatton.garden .................. ~..• / I M.Narnara, plumber, lioundsditch ............ F. S Argent, printer, Fetter.lane W. A. Noble and to., engineers, Rotherhithe '• -- ............. • . , , BIRTH. On the 2.11 inst., at Eton, the lady of the Re' v * 6°ll° joio Dupuis, of a son. MARRIED.. On the 24th inst., at Maidstone, Bransb William 11°11 1 :tr i li ' ' te of Bernard -street, Russell-square, second Y son of h A e s t 4la4 Thomas Powys, Rector of Fawley, Bucks, to Ella , el ' e CO: of Charles Hoare, Esq., of Maidstone. , jolifia" On the 24th i ns t., at St. Pancras New Church, . I. ' .' oi ' head, to Henrietta Letitia, daughter of B. Maddan, 9 ` l .„ ,„7 ston, Jamaica. --------------- iTl r ' i, o ber t On the 23d inst., Mrs. Ma p rth lE a D Sp . arling, wife 0f l' .fO lc° ling, Esq., Effingbam-place, Ramsgate. the late On the 23d inst., in Ipswich, Charlott e , relict of T. J . Reed, Esq. wife ,of : On the 2d of November last, at Patra, Susan, "V Dashwood, Esq., of the Bengal Civil Service. P r i'' , On the 24th inst. ; aged 60, at Edward Gibbons 'g' be is chaers-grove, Brompton, Mrs. Rebecca Page. 1t of ' e ar• On the 17th inst., at Brighton Lady Cornewall, ro le yl!,,jel and mother of the present Sir G 'rg tornewall, in her o f :!$' On the 20th inst., at Brighton, late, second daug hter - .f • °f Pr:tchard, Esq., of Norwood, Surrey, in her 3f3a ye ar• gev, 1;r: , ,Aciar t. l. ) .. n njor th hn e 1 1( 9t e. h ,:s i i n e s y t. 0% i N ir le h r e , r 04f3dtiyi-cear-v:,,iiiEte.lizaobaertth 11.1:04: kle°e4. of eleven children 11, v" Barrister-at-Lair, of of thei ri tter s3 •, ~,0,, ißaOr,i a lit , F l ,,e , On the 24th inst., at the Rector Water Newo, of t o shire, in her 25th year, Ilarriet ' Jane, ' elde:4 daught er ,ott er, 1 1 nßAloolidnidisebuTr.ey;nspquale.re, Philip .s 10 , Randolph Rchard Knipe. ~, Mich° On the 11th inst., at Skirbeck, aged 79, iu r. many years a miLer and baker at Boston. ritils6tt (hare_famlly London: Printed and Published by 511 J RD Or ir9 111 . 2. Strand, at The Sun. Oce, of Middleeox. ll = !'; S 7, 111 111 I tr::tti,, c ,V,2 tt .S -...` I I = _...,:l ....‘,• 0- , MO Cr:C4l. ,- z' 7 w Y' o 8:8-' 11; o‘ 1,7 c 111 I E 111 o ctE !E kb , —; 4 1 g O 0...,:0m0447-; t 111 I 4I 3:!;',.:;;P. ~ C-~ SF - * a tri E - 5 g.eC F? ;: ,. .4. 9. 1 12 ' 5 . . 2 c 2 7 i ; 4 F. '-•• • 0 55, , 5 5 771 s ~ 9 ~~ §){};§ 1;-~~2 } &(/-£ . $!~ f @ I I' g.;74 a z I 4 1 SI ‘4, \~