The Sun. — London, England, 1835-11-10 00:00:00

,Pmrr OF TI C JOURNALS. We find that we were not Inii;ta',:en when we an nounced a division in the Tory camp, on the suhiect of the policy to be pursued cowards the Irish eatholicf% The Times out-k:od:; Herod in '; ;aconsls:,c thi's su!ijeot. One dav it nnkes the discovery that Cie Catholic. Priests poscss, in their power of cxcommu nication, an exclusive conrce cf spiritual influence, pregnant with danger. to the goVernment of the coun try, and enabling them to render the law a dead letter ; and next clay it proposes to lalal these very Priests into the' pay of the State. At present the Priests are paid by their docks,' and the people not only ret;pect them for their superior intelligence, .hut resign themselves implicitly' to their guidance, from a persuasion that those Atordians can have no interest %ill:ph is, nDt identified- 1,-..411 their welfare. The peasantry. have been taught, by long and hitter experience, to look upon the landlords as their natural enemies ; and the late hostility of the Times to the Pri'ests would seem to have been solely occasioned by their efficiency as protectors of the people against the domination of the landlords. To remove the only check on the landlords, the Times proposed yester day that the Prie.:ts should be paifl by the State It was not, Heaven knows," says the Times, " from approbation of their tezots, or from esteem .of _those qua litieS, professional or prsru:.-:, -the worst, of which , they de rive, no doubt, partly f rom th e oi , : ,7tural and vit:cus dis cipline to which they are sul , jected, but some part clso from the political position to which they Iliac -• hitherto been condemned by the State—it is, we say, froM n r 4 hirg like sentiments akin to a love of priests or of Popery that we have ever entertained the hope of effecting good aiding the subsistence of that ambitious, turbulent, and dangerous body. Our purpose has not been to arm them with fresh weapons against the Protestant Monarchy and free Constitution of England ; but to buy their help in defence of both. The design of such a policy is not to strengthen a hostile power; but to subjugate it ; not to en courage disaffection; but to conciliate it, and to engage in the service of law, peace, and magistracy those who have heretofore shown no disposition in their favour, nor, to speak the truth, had any inducement to uptiOld them. We are anxious to have it understood by our Protestant readers that this is no tribute to Popery, but an expedient through which Popery may be reedered, on terms advantageous for its ministers, and certainly not humiliating to them, instru mental to the geuerril security of them." Against this :proposal the Standard is up in arms. “ Our first objection to such a provision (says the Standard) is one the . direct importance of which some will not recognise ; but every rational man must feel its reflected weight. We believe, and we scorn to conceal the belief, that a State establizhment of Pottery--a ,State violation of our Gospel Covenant, renewed at the Refor mation, would be greatly displeasing to Almighty God ; and would provcke Lim to withdraw from this Empire the blessings showered upon it in miraculous profusion during SOO years." But the Standard has another argument :-- 6f Every body who knows any thirFg of the cha.-acter of the Romish Church knows well that with money never can be saturated. Give a million and a half per annum to the Irish pribstS to-morrow, and except you make some tperative bargain for the abandonment. of their pre sent capitation tax to that amount, you simply double the income of the Popish Irish Church : double the number of Missionaries of uncompromising hostility to England, or in crease their luxuries and power, if the numerical addition be smaller." Those who might not be scared by the dread of the consequences of supporting idolatry, are thus supplied with the prudential argument that the outlay would be fruitless. But the Standard has still another argu ment : • " Would the precedent of a State establishment of Po pery in Ireland be wholly unfruitful ? Would it not justify the loyal non-conformists in England, and even the most seditious Dissentersseeing they cannot he nearer to trea son than the Irish Papists—in demanding to overturn the establishment of the Church of England ?" • It is not, perhaps, without reason that the Standard puts this' question, for there are many Protestants in this country who conceive the Church of England to be idolatrous, and anticipate the consequences from the continuance of its connection with the State, which the Standard anticipates from the establishment of idolatry in Ireland. In the Scotsman of Saturday last there is an address from a Minister of the Church of Scotland to the "Tory Ministers of that Church, in which he reproa c h es hi s b re th ren w i t h s l um b er i ng, when 'Tory (:) - iin.sellOrs led to the establishment of Popery in Canada; with lowing in acquiescence when the ToFies gave up thirty thousand pounds of the imblic money for the establishment of :Maynooth Col lege as a seminary for Irish Priests; with their assent ing when a Tory Ministry proposed the yearly grant of nhic thousand pounds per annum, in order'to secure the perpetuity of Popery in Ireland. But this is not all—he reproaches his Tiny brethren for not pro;- tsting af_, , ftinst the mischievous and Popish character ofrthe Episcopalian Church of England:— ' ' !` Oulaforefthers," he observes, " reprobated prelacy as it is established in England, because it involves the essential piinciple (j . Popery. * * * * * * The authori tative,poiver of .absolution in the priesthood constitutes, as we are told by a distinguished prelate, Bishop Gray, in his Bampton Lecture, 'its essential and important claim, with outkvhieb4he 'sacerdotal - commission is destitute of sane tiOns: 'ln Connection with this opinion, holding, as they do, the necessity of episcopal ordination, to give validity to the sacraments, and spirituality to the services of religion, nearly nine-tenths of all the clergy in the united establishment of England and Ireland consider the ministration of Presbyte rian Churches as uwuthorised and nugatory.'" In by far the great majority of instances the preaching. of the minis ters of the Churches oi . England and Ireland ia a :::inure of Popish doctrine as to the necessity of episcopal ordina tion to give efficacy to the sacraments, and more especially to secure the benefit of baptismal regeneration. This is almost univerrally the wretched and Popish character of the Episcopalian Church. The tendency of all this," he adds, " is to kta',pthe people in a state Of religious ignorance, and under spiritual de:athletic:a In this way you have hin dered the progreSs of the truth, and opened up a way for theadritnee of Popery throughout the breadth and length of land. Because the principle of Popery is acknow ledged and is dominant in the Episcopal eccataunion, and because it-has been allowed hitherto to pursue a silent, but doll) tend , wide.-extended course, without any cheek frcm any-barrier raised by your efforts—Popery has incre,lsed, is increasing, and is no longer looked upon with that universal dread which it•forrnatly tivill:o.ned among Protes=tants"" We, 'have no . croup that in character,•;ne the , ChUrChes of. England and Ireland as essentially Popish nod:idolatrous, this Minister of the Church of Scot land epeaks the sentiments of nanny genuine Presby tetians. Where, then, are we to rest, if we essume that the State' must . not ally itself with idolatry ? We find the Irish Catholics branding the Protestant Epis copalians as heretics, the Episcopalians retorting ido latry on the Catholics, the Presbyterians bolding both in abhorrence as Popish, and various sects, seine of them ninnerous e though disagreeing. among them selves, yet nil of thien disagreeitig still more with the Established Church. It is quite . clear that as each seet.belitei-t s its own creed the true one, tile. principle of•the Standard involves a trial of strengths, and lays theloundation for eternal strife. If One man have no rightlo impose his religious opinions on another, the State, Which is inertly an aggregation of individuals, can possess, Strictly E l ) aking, no more right. The plain and simple course .Len would be to respect all becaus e the religiou.-cpinioirs, religiou.ropinioils, merely are the reli gious opinions of parts of th e community and either to leave t o the various con g re g ationsa!z the payment of their , tedthers, ns i n America and among our Dissenters, or to - follow the practice of the Continental Governments, which Amy the teacherS of all religions. In thi s last w a y tbe,?various sects en t er t a i n l eas t animosity towards each. ()trier. In. Ireland, something- like this system must, in time,, be resorted to. It is monstrous to suppose that the Clergy of 700,000 inhabitara,3 will long be allowed to monopolize the funds which belong to a nation of eight millions: The only way of reconciling the MeMbers of the different persuasions to each other is to place all on . a footing of equality, and to distri bute the proceeds of the cee'.e.siastical property among the teachers of all the communities in the ratio of their services. The Times seems to have abandoned the idea. of empl9ying force to compel the Catholic Priests to abandon the power of excommunicating,. The Times has in this acted wisely. Conciliation mq'fail, but force must fail. And by the way, the Tiki's; to have been consistent, must have begun the wao botrie:, - We lind from the Christian Advocate thac eig'4"'iUty a fierce contest among the , 4, n. the Weslean respect ing,N H rel bet4Veee Priests:n n d the Laity I Achigy,g,p9wer of excommunication claimed tviii4 t)tft 00 b;) ." A tha former. The following are the claims ei the _ - iests .‘ Ile Conference, as the cantive pastoi•ate oF the con nexion, has the exclusive prerorative of framing regulations for tl:c manag,ement of the whole body. " Christ has given to the mUlisters of the Gospel the keys of his Church--thus empowering them to receive members within its pale, ~ nna c-:,..!ntle from its commion those offenders whom admenition and sitlutary discipline fail to correct and amend." This, by the bye, is more then Popery. The Wesleyan priests claim higher'powers than the, priests of.any other communion. The Presbyterian Church associates- laymen with -ministers in all exercises of authority ; but here are a set of priests, responsible to no constituencv, claiming the moat unbounded power over a million of men. John Wesley was the Pope while he lived ; but the power may not always be in such good hands: If we arc to interfere with the Catholic Priests on account of their spiritual influence, can we overlook these claims of the Wesleyan Pastors? But the truth is, we must aban;ion all exaggerated claims of rip_ht . to interfere with sects. They all t eac h a pure morality—they all have an interest in the wel fare of their common country. It is for the interest of all that order should be preserved—that property shon!ri be respected—that the laws should be adminis tered with justice and impartiality. This is enough for our living in pc3cT 4114 amity together, tic is the enemy of his country who - atteropts to stir up strife, by making that which is merely a question between man and his Maker, a .pretext for obtaining temporal ad vantages at the e,;.perrie of his brethren.—Mcraing chronicle. It Was stated 0) us yesterday, that the great poli tical question arising cut of the insurrectionary violence of the Irish Priests, .encouraged as they are by the wfetehed subserviency of the Melbourne Government to them and to their projects, differs when viewed in its operations upon England and Ireland respectively. The natural result in this country will be, an effort .on the part of the English Radical revolutionists to raze from its foundations our episcopal church, •and to es tablish, under the guise of equality, the same sort of religious anarchy—mixed, in some cases, with intole rant fanaticism—in others, with detestable hypocrisy-- as prevailed during the latter periods of the Long Par liament. In Ireland the direct consequence . e the sub version of our Protestant church will be that reinstate ment of Popish tyranny, in a legalized. and lasting form, which now oppresses and disturbs the kingdom, in con tempt of all lawful authority. The priests avow their scheme. While O'Connell preaches to Englishmen the voluntary principle, his speeches to the Irish may be construed into one loud " hurrah for Popery," and an assurance that all which the Priesthood ever lost shall be restored to them. Thus the Protestant portion of the King's subjects cannot fail to see what is before them, should the priest-ridden Whigs be able to realize their intentions,—in England no. church—in Ireland worse than no church,—the bar barous and brutalizing despotism of Popery, and that confiscation of every acre of property held for ages by men of Saxon race, with which Father Kehoe, in his hour of holy transport, menaced the Protestant landlords, as now " rapidly approaching." "We will take care," cried his reverence, " that these fel lows shall show their titles." Were those words, we should like to ask, spoken, or were they not ? They are attested by most respectable witnesses. If not spoken, why is not the evidence contradicted ? If spoken, why is not the seditious miscreant unfrocked by his Bishop ? Some adventurous purloiners from the Prayer-book have, we see, discovered that there is such a thing as excommunication in the Church of England as well as in that of Rome ; and we are solemnly reprobated for denouncing the frequent re course had to excommunication, as a threat or punish ment, by - the Popish priesthood of Ireland. Yet cer tain it is that we have looked, not perhaps so . often as we ought to ha've done, into the order, ceremonies, privileges, and seryices of that church of which we humbly confess ourselves to be among the unworthiest members, and thence from our youth up wards we have seen and understood that there was asserted by the ecclesiastical authority a right, and under certain circumstances enjoined to it, a duty of excommunication. T here is likewise, we apprehend, such a . form recognized as that of general commination, to be used on fit occasions by ministers of the Church of England. But unquestionably we never did con ceive that either of these modes of ecclesiastical censure or reproof was directed by the Church of England to be employed against individuals not publicly convicted of any sin against God's Commandments. We are not so conversant with history as to have read 'that a Pro testant clergyman had, in any instance, clone that which is proved m unnumbered cases against the Popish priests—viz., held out the threat of excommunication in this world, and of damnation in the world to come, a;ainst men or women specified by name, because of their having exercised, or in the contingency of their exercising, a mere political right, not involving any reli gious character whatsoever, according to his or her own independent will. We have never heard that under any shadow of pretext, a • Protestant clergyman had publicly cursed from the altar any me of his pa rishioners for having voted how he pleased at an elec tion, or from the altar, again, encouraged the rest of the congregation to pelt such voters with mud and gravel, carrying. their outrages to the utmost point of inhumanity which could .be practised without risk of legal retribution. Yet all this, and more than this has been brought home to. those Popish ruffians who disgrace the name of Christian Ministers in Ireland, and who enforce upon time poor by undisguised ter ror the fulfilment of the most savage and unprinci pled of their own selfish machinations against the fame, the comfort, the peace, and life of unofFend ing and unprotected citizens. As for these Ten talking about their right to be on '' a level" with Protestants, while their apologists seek to, wash over their crimes by tic plea of their only wishing to rain their flocks to an - equality with their Protesta. neighbourhood, we defy one or all of their ten thousand saints to work a- - miracle so stupendous. I3efore they can place themselves on the same floor with the Protestant clergy, or their barbarian multitude with the Protestant laity, they must remove a few mo ral mountains—they must learn some r;gard to truth themselves, and teach their followers some better com prebensioa of the difference between right and wicked ness. - The Papists of Ireland, as a body, are 100 years behind their Protestant fellow-subjects in the growth of their intelligence and in the capacity for freedom. Educate them—ay, it were a glorious task —but will the priests listen to any scheme of educa tion fOr their humbler parishioners, of which the ten- dency is to lift than above the excommunication, the .delusion, the superstition level ? They will not, for it would be the overthrow of their priestly power. The abuses, accordingly, which prevail in the application of the new system of Government schooling ate re presented to' us to be altogether fearful, and to call for the interposition of men :II authority—if, indeed, - those who at present answer that description Were qualified for so important a duo'. The plain fact is, that the Irish priesthood wields unbridled power, ut terly incompatible with the working of any free in stitutions. \Viten men speak of the elective frau chise in Ireland being- a right of the people, and of the people derivin► any conceivable good from such a nominal privilege, it is all pure nonsense ; the right is in the hands of the priest. The . Popish hier archy are the electors of Ireland. The more you extend the franchise, the more you augment their power. The people are but automata, of wheal these spiritual tyrants are the unresisted movers ; therefore let us unmask the humbug! The only alternative for those who wish to have an independent, that is to say, a free constituency, is either, as suggested, we think, by Mr. Singleton, to raise the: qualification to such a point as would exclude from the franchise all who had not some means of liberal education . and independent livelihood, su c h as to exempt t h em f rom the tyranny of priest or landlord— a real blessing if it were attainable ; but one for which the tempest of the political season has left the country at present unprepared,—or to do that which we yesterday recommended, and which we much regret to find is discountenanced by authorities entitled to all deference and consideration—namely, en gage the priesthood itself : in The service of the consti tutional monarchy, by a decent maintenance on one side, and stern watchfulness on the other. Now, it - THE SUN, LONDON, TUESDAY„ ,NOVintilE It PO. would be ridiculous to den y that the I:1;ms and mecha nism of a free constituti;)n arc treaclu rously turned against the vitals cf the State.— Time 3. • Some of the most monstrous dogmas that were ever broached—some .of the most despotic doctrines that were ever attempted to be palmed off in the days of the profoundest popular ignorance and credulity, are now openly brought forward, in the impotent en deavour of supporting the unnatural union of Church and State. That union, barbarous and fallacious in itself, is not to be advocated hut throtili the aid of arguments equally barbarous and fallacious, and ac cordingly we find the assertors in its favour propagat ing the most outrageous' 'opinions, and distorting the Most palpable facts in maintenance of their hypocri tical designs and &testable Ihig,otries. lt is 'asserted " that the King's Ministers. conspire the abOlition of the Irish Church Est a bli s h ment , b y d epr i v i ng it of the funds from which it has heretofore- been subsisted." Here, then, is the avowal gratuitously made, that Religion and Revenue are what we have so frequently pronounced them to he, synony- Mous with the champions of the Established Church. And, again, as if borrowing their code of Faith from the Poperies which they so vehemently and venomously denouncc,they say "there must be everywhere some form of civil government, and w e , w h o h re f rien d s to a Ch urc h Establishment, affirm that there must be some one Es tablished Church." The logical acumen of the Popish catechism, that as there is one God, one one bap tism, Caere cannot be but one true Church, is not more barbarous and intolerant than this. And ,when they say " the question is for Englishmen . what Church ouLit to be preferred," it brings it home to every man's breast to reply '' my own ;" and it would be well for those fanatical defenders of a dominant Church to reflect whether in England, not to speak of Ire land, the voice of the majority of the people will declare for the ascendancy of a particular sect, ra ther than for the voluntary principle, which allows every man to worship his Maker as his conscience dic tates, and guarantees the individual liberty of all. Who can be so sunk in delusion as to suppose that now, when even the modifications of religious opinion arc so multiform and fine-drawn, that the. principle will longer be admitted, that the many are to be subjugate to one—that the grand order of nature is to be reversed, and that a part is greater than the whole? Who can suppose or expect that the great body of the people of Ireland will longer endure the ministers of one-tenth of their population, not only to ride rough-shod over the other nine -tenths, but to monopolize the whole fund designed for the relief, edu cation, and spiritual comfort of the whole community ? If the language of a Conservative zealot he correct when he says, " The folly of adducing the Papists in America as a reason for investing them with substan tial power here, is utterly contemptible—in America they dare not stir, or speak a word beyond their breath, being not above one-tenth of the population !"—if this be correct in regard to the- Papists of America, should it not be equally applicable to the Protestants of Ire land ; or are the Irish so subdued and degraded by their wrongs, as to be expected to succumb to hierarchical principles that would be scouted and spurned from any other portion of the civilized world ? Again, this inveterate stickler for ecclesiastical ascendancy and abuse asserts, " th a t th e cree d o f t h e majority ought to be that of the Monarch Some savage Chiefs might make temporal sacrifices for the good of their tribes, but we doubt much whether in their devotion they would offer up their eternal happiness ; and it is a long time since a Monarch of England has given such a proof of self-denial as to offer. tip the one or the other ; nor should we respect him the more if he were to do so, as any man, having religion as the basis of his conduct, should consider it the beginning and end of existence, and no consideration should in duce him to compromise his hopes of a happy futurity. If the advocates of an Established Church can find no better arguments than these, their cause is not likely to derive much benefit from their advocacy ; and we would recommend a certain Journal to resume the extracts from the Irish Commission, which caused such " an extraordinary sensation," rather than indulge in a commentary which makes it the laughing-stock of " three-fourths," as it has long been the con t empt , o f the entire of the population of Great Britain.—Morn ing Advertiser. It is said that the subject of prison discipline is-at present under the consideration of his Majesty's Go venni-writ, and that measures arc likely to be proposed in the course of the ensuing Session calculated to remedy the glaring defects of the present system, and to supersede, to a still further extent, the brutal execu tions of the gallows. It is needless to say that we rejoice at this. ,The friends of humanity will rejoice at it, not from an affectation of false sentiment and spu rious tenderness so often laid to their charge by those who, though willing enough to treat the wisdom of our ancestors with contempt in other instances, felt an anxiety to preserve the gallows from that innovation to which they were willing to submit every other institution of the country. The failure, the palpable failure of the experiment, which sought to prevent crime by a process calculated to harden the hearts of the people, and tor degrade our character in the eyes of Europe, by the ferocious spirit of our criminal code, was in itself suf ficient evidence that it was not by false sentiment, or pretended humanity, the outcry was raised, which led to a mitigation of the penalty of death in many cases, and which happily has proved in the experiment a more effective check to the commission of crime than the old practice, now partially, and we hope soon to be more extensively exploded. If the Government apply itself vigorously to the improvement of prison discipline we may look forward, not only to sec our prisons be , come what they ought to be, the correctives instead o CITA 7N; CERY COURT. .1116 Di DA V. pelcre Sir C. PE: Ys and Sir J. BC2ANQUET, the Lord , : Commissioners.) WATKINS V. LRENT. This was a motion to..discharge an order of the Vice- Chancellor, appointing a receiver of the estate and effects of a Mr. Timotl.l• Brent, who died in 1833, and directing at the same time that Mr. William Brent, the defendant, be restrained from receiving any of the moneys, or other wise interim - Ailing with the estate. Mr.. Timothy Brent, the deceased, bad.no children ; and it appeared that, for scare time previous to his death, he carried about with him .a small box, containing three several papers relative to the disposal of his property. By the first of these papers he gave directions that the whole of his property was to go to Mrs. Margaret Brent, his widow,, to be enjoyed by, her during her life, and at her decease to be.divided into three shares, one of which was to go to Mr. William Brent, his nephew, who is the Judge of the Palace Court, and the other two shares to be divided among certain of his next of kin, mentioned in the document in question. The other papers kept in the box were letters to Mr. W. Brent, in Nvhich the deceased informed him that he Wished him and his widow, Mrs. Margaret Brent, to act as his executors. The next of kin then took objections to Mr. W. Brent tak ing the management of the property, and their representa tives filed a bill in this Court praying an injunction against the•defendant, and the appointment of a receiver to the estate. His Honour the VieE-CHANcELLoa, after hear ing Counsel for all parties, granted this application, and the motion now made was by way of appeal from that de cision. Mr. KINDERSLEY opposed the motion; and Mr. WIGRAM having replied, Their LORDSHIPS took time to consider their judgmen the nurseries of crime, but to see a good systeth of se. condary punishments operating steadily in the reduc tion of offences. Several propositions have been made with this view, and we believe it will be found that the result of the investigations directed by the Government in the United States of America, and elsewhere, en courage an opinion that much may still be done for the protection of the community against culprits, without having recourse to the scaffold.. One of the recent 'changes introduced into our prison discipline would seem to have already struck terror; not only into the hearts of offenders, but into those of benevolent persons, who are constitutionAy averse to the infliction of strong punishments. We allude to the " silent system." It is. admitted upon all hands that this system works well, not only as a punishment, but as a preventive of that moral contagion too frequent in prisons. Several Ma gistrates have - borne testimony to its efficacy in different parts of the country where it has been tried, but an outcry has been attempted to be raised against it upon the ground that it produces insanity. If this imputa tion were true, we should at once admit that no tri bunal had a right to inflict such a visitation upon any even the worst offenders. Nothing, however, has yet ' come btdore the public in the shape of evidence to au thorise that assumption, though we arc aware that it has been repeatedly made and strongly' insisted on. The fact that the system• still prevails •in America is against it, for we cannot believe of any Government of rational creatures, that - they • would rather inflict madness than death. Of one thing we are certain, that the moment such a fact was ascertained in this country, that moment would be the last of the system. No doubt .the Government will not exclude from its consideration a point of such importance as this, nor omit to inquire of what modifications it may be sus ceptible, in order to fulfil, the purpose for whi c h i t i s intended. What we want. is a .system of prison discipline unfavourable to the propagation of crim e , and . avowable to its extinction, that we may be enabled to dispense in most, if not in all cases, with the penalty of death, and yet reserve to the law the power of vindi cating its own authority.—Morning Herald. The fall of rain in this neighbourhood during th e last few days has been very great, every brook and lake being nvorflown, and the lowlands and roads in some parts presenting a complete deluge, and a great loss of p roperty has been th e consequence . O n T ues d a y last, in Cower, the rush of water in the Burry was so great and sudden that it swept away a new bridge, substantially built, at Cheriton, and also a Wooden bridge at Stainbridge.—Cambri an . FIRE -DAMP AT OLDHAM.—An explosion of fire damp occurred on Monday at the Black Ridings Pit, Bloke lane. A collier named Ogden was the only person seriously injured, and he now lies in a dangerous condition.—llfan ehester.Chrottick. . . . : _ ~ 6q.~ r .~.~ _JG .r 4 :... -._. ~. KING'S BENCH.-NIONDAY. THE RING ON THE PROSECUTION OP BADGER V. COOKE. The defend an t i n thi s case appeare d to show cause in person against a rul e f or a cr i m i na l i n f ormat i on which had been applied for against him for the publication of a libel. In the first instance he applied that this rule might be en larged till the case of Davis v. Badger had been dispoSed . of. He stated that this was an action of assault brought against a Magistrate, in which a verdict had been given for the plaintiff with 304 damages ; but a rule had since been obtained to set aside that verdict and • have a new trial. That rule was still depending, and he wished that the rule in the present 'case might be postponed till that case had been decided, because he believed that the result of that case would materially influence, if not actually decide, the present. He further grounded his application for the post ponement of the rule on the circumstance that he had not been furnished with copies of the affidavits on which the rule had been obtained. Lord DENMAN said that the Court would allow the case to be postponed for a few days, in order to give the de fendant the opportunity of filibg affidavits. The defendant did not wish its postponement. He had ttvo affidavits, which, though sworn, had not been filed. He then produced these affidavits, and made a statement of the circumstances of the case. Mr. Sergeant GOULBURN supported the rule. The COURT thought that the rule ought to be made absolute. THE KING V. THE ARCHDEACON OF MIDDLESEX. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL showed cause against a rule for a 2nandanzus, obtained in Easter Term, calling upon the defendant to show cause why he refused t 6 swear in Messrs. Hayward and Taylor as Churchwardens of St. Martin's-in the-Fields. Sir W. FOLLETT appeared to support the rule.—Rule absolute. In the course of the day, the Lord Mayor, accompanied by the City officers, came into Court, and the Recorder, in his Lordship's name, invited the Judges to the civic banquet. BAIL COURT.-MONDAY. THE POOR. LAWS. Mr. AUSTIN had obtained a - rule for a mandamus, di recting Mr. Law Sims to deliver up certain books and papers, and pay over the-balance of the monies in his hands as overseer of the parish of Brancaster, in the county of Norfolk. When the rule was moved for, it was on the ground that the Magistrates had disqualified Mr. Sims under the 4th and sth William IV., cap. 76, sect. 97. Affidavits were produced by Mr. Austin to induce the. Court to grant a rule. This day Mr. F. KELLY showed cause against the rule. He contended that Mr. Sims had been unjustly deprived of his office. The cause of the present application was, that Mr. Holloway, the Curate, presided at the meeting which disqualified Mr. Sims: This meeting was held in December—of course before the term of Mr. Sims' over overseership had expired. He was, consequently, by right in possession of:,all the books and papers, and received and disbursed all the monies for parish purposes. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE said the present was a question of disqualification. It certainly would—as the case was a most important one—be better that it should stand over, for a day or two, in order that he might consult the other . Judges. ntimEn V. GODAM--CRIM. CON, The defendant had given bail to try the case peremptorily at the first sittings after the last Term ; but the plaintiff alleged he could not find his bail, who had quitted their re sidences, and he was apprehensive the defendant was going abroad. Mr. MANsELL this day showed cause against the rule. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE thought that it would be better to discharge the rule ; and that the plaintiff should pay the costs of the present application, which course was acceded to. CLARKE V. BAINES. Sir W. FOLLETT stated that this was an action against the defendant as the proprietor of the Leeds Mercury, to recover damages for a libel inserted in that journal. The plaintiff had been in business in London, where he became a bankrupt, and had not yet obtained his certificate. He recently set up in business in Manchester, and on his doing so a paragraph appeared in the Manchester Guardian, cau tioning all persons from having any dealings with him. This paragraph was copied into the defendant's paper, and five other local journals ; the plaintiff brought actions for libel against each of them, some in the King's Bench, others in the Exchequer, and some in the Common Pleas, The one against the Manchester Guardian was brought in the latter Court. The defendants pleaded a justification, and called witnesses on the trial in support of it. The Lord Chief Justice who tried the cause doubted whether the justifica tion had been completely made out as to one point, and reeted the Jury to find fur the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the Court. The Jury found for the plaintiff•; damages one farthing; and the Learned Judge said be would certify, in order to deprive the plaintiff of his costs. The plaintiff had since obtained a rule' nisi to• enter up that verdict, and which rule was still pending, ; and he therefore trusted that the Court would give the de fendant in this case time to plead until the rule in the other Court was disposed of. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE—Take your rule. COMMON PLEAS.-MONDAY. CHANNELL V. CURTIS. This was an action for libel. It was brought by the plaintiff' against the defendant for charging him with false swearing to certain parochial accounts. The plaintiff was assistant overseer in a parish i❑ Norfolk, and he swore to the accounts of his superior, which he knew to be correct. The action was tried at the last assizes, when.the plaintiff obtaining a verdict. • Mr. BIGGS ANDREWS showed cause against the rule. The Court discharged the rule. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. Alderman ANSLEY sat yesterday at tbe.C(;unter, Gilt spur-street, to dispose of the whole of the City charges. James Moller, a well-dressed fellow, was placed at the bar, charged with robbing Mr. Arthur Tucker, a cattle dealer, of Ashley, Devonshire, during the Civic procession. Th e prosecutor, about twelve o'clock, was passing down . ?oultry, when the prisoner came towards him in the crowded part. Prosecutor had his band in his right ers pocket, which the prisoner jerked out, and put his instantly extracting a purse, containing twelve sove reiirus. Prosecutor seized him, but he got away. Richard Cox, residing at Islington, witnessed the tran- most rows , OM saction. J o seph King, a city constable, said the thieves were working in gangs. The prisoner had just separated with another from a dozen or more. He produced a loaded whip-handle, which he found under the prisoner's coat, buttoned up. he t l h r i a e s le fi s i , ll t y he e° c al ld rn e i s t t teti Four prisoner yo not exceedi ng 14, were charged with attempting the pockets of the crow d w h o h a d assembled at the Custom House. They were remanded. At the close of the business information w as rece i ve d ung that a gentleman had been robbed of4o/. Sart:thrall Southy, a c hild, not mare 'than 10, Q UEEIV'S- S Q UA 12 Z years of r age,WHITE and BURRELL , the sitting Magi s t rates, charged Yesterday , was brought up i n custo d y b efore Messrs .. with robbing her mistress. Mrs. Eliza Burrell, of Holland -street, Blackfriars-road ~ stated that some months back, at the solicitation of the parents, she took the prisonet• into her ser v i ce . O n Satur day she had occasion to leave home for some time, and on her return she found that the girl had left the house, when, thinking it very suspicious, she searched a box, which she had left half a sovereign, and found that it was gone. She gave information of the robbery to the police. Police constable divis:or), 92, stated - fat, in consequence of:the , information be received from Mrs. Burrell, he traced the prisoner, -and took her into custody, when she acknowledged having stolen the half-sovereign from her mistress; and that she had purchased a shawl and a row-of beads with the sine at a shop in Shoreditch, both of which were on her person at the time witness ap prehended her. The parents of the prisoner said, with tears in Ceir eyes, that they were afraid that their child was irreclam able ;• she had always been addicted to petty-thefts. 'rue Magistrates remanded her. THAMES POLICE. Yesterday Captain William Allan, the master of the Royal Adelaide Scotch steam-ship, and Richard Clarke, the pilot of the vessel, were brought bef("re Mr. COMBE for final examination on the charge of running down the Fawn oyster smack, off Woolwich, and causing the death of Ri chard Baker, the master of the vessel, and a man, a pas senger on board, whose name is unknown. The case excited very considerable interest, the Office being crowded to excess. The substance of the evidence Las been already given in our columns. The depositions were read over, and the witnesses bound over to appear and give their evidence next sessions.. One of the witnesses (Jones) being absent, the prisoners were again remanded until to-morrow morn ing (this day),.when Jones will be in attendance, and,• on his evidence being xcad the prisoners will be forthwith sent t6Newgate to await their trial. The examination occu pied nearly the whole day. HAMBURG. PAPERS. HANOVER, Nor. 2.--Their Royal Highnesses the Duke and Duchess •of Cambridge, and the Princesses their daughters, arrived here yesterday from .RCtuskiratur after an absence of several months from this city. We hear that the Duke will stop only a few days, and then go to visit the Court of Mecklenburg, Schwerin. ST. PETERSBURG, OCT. 31.—Her Majesty the Empress and the Grand Duchess Olga arrived on the 27th in per fect health, at Zarskojeselo. Count Nesselrode has also returned to St. Petersburg. According to accounts from Odessa of the 16th, Count Woronzoff had set out on the preceding night for Bjce laja-Tserkow. Count Strongonoff arrived in the steam boat from Athens: The Pluto returned from Nicolejeff on the 14th. The Captain had followed Lord Durham to Bjcelaja 2 Tserkew. In the night of the 10th Lord Durban arrived at Nicolajeff. At the passage over the Beg every thing was prepared for his reception. An eighteen oared barge was waiting for him, and the Commandant in-Chief of the Police had repaired to the spot to receive him. On arriving in the town Lord Durham alighted at a house which had been prepared for him, and which the owner had offered for the occasion. On the following day (Oct. 11) his Lordship and suite dined with Admiral Lazareff, Commander-in-Chief of the Fleet and of the Ports in the Black Sea, who had invited several of the principal inhabitants and the chief naval officers. The Admiral gave as a toast " The King of England, and the Ambassador to the Emperor of . Russia." The first was accompanied with " God save the King," sung by a chorus of vocal per formers, and the second by the Russian " National Hymn." The Ambassador then rose again, and the glass in his hand, spoke to the following effect in the French language :—" Let us drink this glass in honour of the Russian navy ; I . wish it may attain the highest degree of perfection and power ; May a friendly relation always subsist betweeir it and the British fleet, and may they never meet except to assist each other in promoting the common advantage and glory of both empires. To these wishes I add one for the health of Admiral Lazareff." On the 12th his Lordship visited the Admiulty., the Ob servatory, some ships in the roads, and after d;. - aing again with Admiral Lazareff, - proceeded on his journey to Kies°. BERLIN, Nov. 3.—The Emperor of Russia, by an Ordi nance of the 16th of October, has conferred estates in the kingdom of Poland, on sixteen distinguished Russian Ge nerals, to enjoy in perpetuity, as private property. Count. Orloff, Adjutant-General to his. Majesty the Em peror of Russia, has arrived here (last from Frankfort.) The Russian Major-General Wiatkin is gone to Petersburgh. AMERICAN PAPERS. (From the Cincinnati TV hig of the 30th alt.) " VERY UNPLEASANT.—We are exceedingly pained to learn that while Mr. Clay was attending to a suit as Coun• sel in the Court House at Lexington, a few days ago, some altercation took place between him and Colonel Woolley, when the latter struck Mr. Clay, and immediately a general combat took place between the parties. litigant. We regret to add that the r e p or t s t a t es tat Mr: Clay, during the affray, was considerably injured. As might be expected, the affair had created great excitement, and iltrther difficul ties were anticipated. We have heard no oth6r particulars." VERY IMPORTANT PROM Tr.X.A3.—We have received from a gentleman in Texas a letter, dated the Gth of Sep tember, giving the important intelligence that a Convention was to be held on the l sth of October, composed of fife Members elected from each jurisdiction of the province, to consult on the public safety, and intimating that one of its acts would be.a " Declaration of Independence." The fol lowing are extracts " The state of our affairs, which have beCn for some time extremely threatening to our new settlement, has at last come to such a pass that leaves us no alternative but to yield our brilliant prospects with our bard earnings (ob tained at the sacr ifi ce o f our beloved country, the United States) to the Mexicans, or to expel them by force Of arms from Texas, our adopted country. This we will do or die in the attempt, We occupy a country which, but for our presence, would ever have remained a wilderness, because the Mexicans were afraid to occupy a country inhabited by so many Indians ; and these numerous tribes, which are'settled about us in every direction, they are by spies and emissaries trying to raise to strike the first blow on the American settlers of Texas, and embrue their murderous tomahawks in the blood of our defenceless women and chil dren. Our particular location is more exposed than any other, the neighbourhood . having settlements of N or th American Indians wh o , h av i ng bcome dissatisfied in the United States, came here several years ago. They consist principally of Cherokees, Shawnees, Kickapoos, Delawares, Coshatoes and Alabamas, and there are besides numerous small Spanish tribes, all of whom reside within 25 to 60 miles of Nacogdoches, and the two first mentioned, who are the most numerous, within 25 to 35 miles. Some of these Indians arc visiting us daily to trade. Sixty horses were counted the other day in the town. These Indians always have been friendly with us, and would remain co, were it not ' for the infamous overtures made to them by the Commandant of the Mexican army; who has taken possession of San Antoine, distant from us 340 miles, situated in the direc tion in which our neighbouring .Indians go to hunt. "This desperate state of affairs will oblige me to change my plans. I have it contemplation to take my family for immediate safety to Fort Jessop, and, leaving them there for a short time, as we have several friends in the garrison, till a more healthy season to descend Red River, and ascend the Mississippi, Acre, in elm: our troubles continue, they can remain. I shall not be able to accompany them, as ad my future prospects are in Texas, and they are mow most probably to be left to a state of war. The' confidence which the Americans in Texas feel in their prowess over the Mexican troops gives them much less uneasiness than they have from their more powerful neighbours, the Indians, most of whom we consider equal warriors with ourselves, while we calculate to whip the Mexican troops with great I facility." CORONERS INQUESTS. Yesterday evening an inquest was held at the Victory, Edmund -street, King's-Cross, before Mr. STIRLING and a respectable Jury, on view of the body of Mr. George Kaiss, twenty-six years of age, a foreigner. Mr. Peter Burck, of Earl-street, Soho, deposed that the deceased was a native of Germany, which country he left about three months back for England, and had resided at witness's house since his arrival. He was single. On that day fortnight he (deceased) was taken seliously ill, his complaint being a violent fever attended with delirium. By the advice of the surgeon who attended him witness re moved him to the Fever Hospital in a coach ; but, on Mr. Ley, the house-surgeon of the said establishment, seeing him, he declared his (deceased's) complaint to be the sniall-pox ; and, is: consequence, he was taken to the Small Pox Hospital. Witness saw him some days after his ad mission, when he was delirious and talked very incoherently. By the Jury—The deceased had frequently complained of indisposition since his arrival in this country. Ido not believe he has any relatives in this country. Mr. J. Furness Masson, resident surgeon of the hospital, said he attended the deceased on his admission. Every thing was done for the unfortunate mar., but he rapidly sank, and died on Friday. He had fallen from a height of more than forty feet. The Jury returned a verdict of Insanity. Yesterday afternoon an inquest was held at the Edin burgh .Castle Had, Welbeck-street, Cavendish-square, before Mr. STIRLING, and a must respectable Jury, on view' of the body of Sir David Barry, Knight, aged SG. Doctor Copland, of BulstrOde-street, Cavendish-square, knew the deceased, and had flequcntly attended him pro fessionally during his lifetime. About three o'clock on Wednesday afternoon witness Was requested to attend the deceased at his residence, No. 2G, Welbeck-street. lie Went immediately, and was informed by - the domestics that Sir David had been taken alarmingly ill in the Hay-market, 0.4 and was brought home in a 'coach. - On' examination; the patient w:triess discovered him to be in a very dan,c rt ous state.• He liras rnfl'ering from great depression; sensible. Two other medical gcntlemen had previaus' , _ Doctor a seen him. A cons:i lt a ti on , - co n s i st i n g o f witne3s. Johnson, Mr. M'lntyre,,Tand Mr. Cbisani, tookplace' ;in witness continued with him ur,:,il ten oVbck• on Wedne° 3 . night, at whi c h ti me h e b a d solnew h at r a lli e d . Ab o ut o °o the following day witness was sen t f or , an d f a lloffe'l 14 messenger as soon as possible, but on his arrival Sir Ja,m had just breathed hi s. l as t. O n a post mo dem exaro l t tion it was di scovere d t h at the aorta, or laige artery 101. ; ing from the h ear t, was rupture d , caus i ng a great en s° in the right cavity of the chest, and which was unquestior ably the cause of death. am t By the CottoNEtt.•--The patient generally sarvives avu" t twelve hours after such a rupture. I have no doubt 14 , that the rupture took place when the deceased was firz' taken ill in the Haymarket. Elizabeth Bowen, one of the deceased's servants* de ; posed that her master complained of a pain in the chest c t Wednesday m orn i ng , b u t wa lk e d o ut afterwards. I n 1 " an hour and a h a lf h e was b roug h t home ill in a coac h, a _IP a short time Dr. J o h nson an d M r. M'lntyre attack"' and subsequently Dr. Copland. By the CORONER—My master had not met with aq accident or received any violence to my knowledge. Dr. Johnson and Mr. M'lntyre corroborated the testimog of Dr. Copland as to the cause of the deceased's death. The Jury expressed themselves 7 satisfied, and rewind; verdict of " Died by the visitation of God." The de,ea s r was a physician, a nd very e mi nent i n his proletAon. has left a widow and family. ----- SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. 11 ADVICES, ARRIVALS, AND DEPA:ATURES AT THE SCOTCH WHARFS,. I",o' vEmBER 9. • , DUNDEE AND PERTH STEAM WHARI:.,__A dv (.CC, Perth, and London Shippir4 'Company's steam- 5° ! 1 : Perth, John Spink, commander, arrived at Dundee, at Or" A.M., the 6th inst. . No arri- l'. :ats cr.% departures. 01 1 HORE'S' WHAEF.- , -Ad': iCC : the D a t r • i n ices : the Dundee, Perth, and Lon don Shipping Coml:-„ny's smack Glasgow, arrived at Di1,.,7 1 ,`, the SCI inst. ; '':.,ct the liiikaldy and London Shipping ' oil pariv; smar;',( Entorprise, James Mann master, sa iled 11 Shot Kirkal(l-. 6th inst. for. this wharf; arid the JeSsie, D. S c ' t , matter, arrived at Leith the sth inst. No arrivals or del' tures. CARBON WHAor.—Advice : the Carron Shipping . C°/11 ; pony's v esse l Mi nerva, Andrew O raham master, arrive d 3 Grangementh the sth inst. No arrivals or departures. , LEITH AND GLASGOW WHARF.—N o a d v i ccs or Imo Departure: the London and Glasgow Shipping CornPani r steam-ship Royal Adelaide, William Allen commander , 1° Leith, with goods and passenger,.. in d LF.ITII AND BERWICK WHARF.—Advice : the LondsT l 7,, Leith Old Shipping Company's smack Walter Scott, Wil lia " r Dick mast er , arr i ve d at L e i th the sth inst. No arriva l s ° depart'ares. ARRIVALS IN THE RIVER. —The Emerald Isle, ThoOn Flett master, f rom C or k ; t h e Union, Patrick Walker niastf,t, from D un d ee; t h e E xpress, D. Mitchell, master, from , Petersburg ; and the Isaiella, J. Greif master from Perth' 1,, WRIGHT'S I RONOATE L OWER WHARF.—Advice : the Vei t % A. Munr o master , sa il e d from Leith the 3d inst. for 413' Wharf. '/S. 'ESSELS ENTERED INWARDS AT TIM 'C/ j. TOM-HOUSE, Nov. 9. Joliffe, Downie, from Hamburg ; Finish Stroogs: hill, Borde aux ; D art , Bl ac k , Ostend ; Sir Edward 8314 Norwood, Rotterdam; De .Jonge Alida, Van Berkel, ROO' dam ; Friendschaft, Fack, Gluckstadt; Friends, Sparrl Guernsey; Champion, Martin, VoAtizz a; M ary an d Held' Kiel Johanne, Kroger, Newstadt; Del G o de Tesker, Stege ; Challenger, Alexander, Smyrna ; ExPLr: Mitchell, Petersburg; Meridian, Kell, Pctersburgli; El i Cowper, P e t ers b urg h ; G annet, Harman, Petersbur,yd, Tourist, Crow, Antwerp; Huntclitle Sinclair, H a vre ; Heldt, Da nz i g ; E mma, Maine, :Messina and Palermo! NyMph, Hutchinson, Guernsey ; Betseys, Dunn, Ilainburg; Julie, Prea gc r,Walais ; Lavinia, Turner, Hambu r g ; Libertt' Pain, .B l oulonge ; M ary , S ma l l, - Lisbon ; Good Inter', M'Crintlall, Guernsey; John, Bell, Corbin, Hamburg. ENTERED OUTWARDS FOR LOADING, Nov. 9 ; ,Elise, Mailer, f or B remen; U n i on, Canduc, Calais; l'•!•n„i' George, Garn er , Ostend, Bruges, and Gh ent; Li on , Waif' Amsterdam and Nevis ; Hereford, Freer, Bahia • Freuv s ; chaft,•Shaw, Flam - ourn.; Kellic Castle, Patt^rloo 111adi as and Calcutta; Wm. 'LaCk b erby, Sowerby, Sydney ; Delphiu, trickson, Frede.rickston. CLEARED OUTWARDS WITH CARGO, No v ' St. Croix, Bradley, for Honduras ; Brightman, Nsfkl e s. Jamaica; Catharine, Hagin, Hamburg; William Hadne!tP St. Vincent; Halifax Packet, Cromartic, Barbadoes ; count Downe, Hart, Hamburg • Alexander, Penny, Rio JP neiro ; Gambi er , M'Cormick, gt. Mary's. CLEARED OUTWARDS IN BALLAST, Nov. 9. Dorft Gasmer, Vanderzie, for Worcum; Kingston, Still'' , Memel; Britannia, Mitchell, Cadiz. VESSELS SPOKEN WITH. The• Columbine, of Glasgow, hound to St Domingo, on th e , 20th ult. in lat. 31. long. 31. The Garland, from Liverpo° l , to Savannah, on the 28th ult., in lat. 45. lon. Is:, with loss of both topma s t s i n a ga l e on t h e 25th. The Litherland, from Liverpool to Barbadoes, on the 30th ult., in lat. 28. long. 12" by the Edgecombe, arrived at Liverpool. ARRIVALS AT LIVERPOOL, Nov. 8. The Wilberforce, Harrison, from Maranham, sailed Sept . 23 ; Adelaide, Shield, from Rio Janeiro ; Allbrcck, Baker? from Boston, sailed Sept. 12 ; Johanne, from Stettin ; Cas sandra, Greig, from St. John's, N.B. ; Montelim, Ch am ber°, from H a lif ax; Ad e l a id e, M i llenson, from Gijon; Providenoi' from Newfoundland ; Perseverance, from Amsterdam ; from Cadiz ; Betsey, from Bordeaux; Merchant, from Qu e : bee; Kingston, fro m Q ue b ec • Elizabeth, M'Donald, ~ . Demerara ; Eli za b e th Walker, from Valparaiso; Rope , from Marseilles; Camerton, Brown, from Buenos M I :: and Antwerp; Kilmaurs, Sharp, from Quebec, off port; Lau: Douglas, Dawsoo, from Alnwick; Lowder Castle, Middle ton, from Wicklow; Aimwell, from Shoreham ; Witty, Sheil, from Wexford. SAILED, Nov. 8. The Sophia, Macnaughton, for Newfoundland; M all ' Laind, for Newfoundland and Brazil; Bell, APlnnes, le r Oporto ; Waverly, Phillips, for New York ; Sheffield, Alle n ' for New York; Matilda, Wardle, for the Mauritius ; S us ; quellannalt, Cropper, f or Phil a d elphia; Libra, Martin, l,e Port-an-Prince ; Romac, Dixon, for Valparaiso. TELEGRAPHED, Nov. 8. Off Holyhead, inward bound, the Aindwell (not quite sure (ADVERTISEMENT. ) DESSERT FRUIT KNIVES AND FORKS. Kited on Silv er Steel Blades. ) 113, ;' a '" „ d Plain Ivory handles, s il ver f errules, per cozen pair...X3 3 it £e , I , ° Carved ivory handl es ,- s il ver ferrules, per dozen pair 016 6 , Plain pearl handles, silver ferrules, per dozen pair... 4 4 ). ; a 0 Carve.l pearl hand: es , sil ver f errules, per dozen fair 3 8 0 12 7 0 King's pattern or QbleCll% pattern, silver handles 616 6 14_ 1 ' T. COX SAVORY, Worki ng Gold and Silversmith, 47, CO"' hill, London. N". B. A detailed list of the prices of Silver Plate, Plated Good" &c. may be had gratis. ' • B 1 1? S. -- On tho ld inst., at PariS, the lady of Kenelm H. Digby, of a danghter. On the 7th i ns t., i n W e lb eek-street, the lady of Dr. Ruthe • f ° air i of a solL t y On the 7th inst., at Stoekton-rectory, Worcestershire, the la' of the Rev. NV. F. Raymond, of a daughter. On the 7th inst., . the lady of the Rev. John Alexander Gen'eff of Woolley, Berks, of a daughter. On the tith inst., at Clapham-common, the lady of the Il c "' Frederick Borradaile, of a son. On the 9th inst.., the lady of Edvin Leaf, Esq., Dulwich, °f daughter. MARRIED. On the sth inst., at Halberton, Devon,.the Rev. Edw. Hawkioi, of Chureham, Gloucester, to Frances, daughter of Capt. Twistleo, 11. N., of the Halberton. On the sth inst., in Tickhill Church, Edmund L'Estranp, son of the late Colonel L'EArange, i;loystown, King's conioy, Ireland ' to Miss Henrietta S. L. Lunt lc_;, of T. Luniel Smile, Esq., of Tickhill-castle. On the 7th i nst ., at Hurstbottme-Tarrant, Hants, J o hn I, Virt` arg , eldest s on o f t h e l ate Thomas Hale, Esq., of Islington, to fifth daughter of th e Rev. Willi am E as t on , Vi car o f Bur , tom bourne-Priors, Ha n t s , an d P re b end of Swallowclift, On the 7th inst., at Brighton, Mr. JGhn Ogle Else, of Du ke. street, Manchester-square, to Mary Ann W es t, niece of Alderman Lucas, of Wateringbury, Kent. 'On the 9th inst., at Christchurch, Surrey, William Smith, EA . ' of Mackfriars-road, to Miss Hannah Mathews, of Norwood. On the 9th i ns t., at W oo d ford Church, Sir. James Henry linPri' „ o ' Strand, second sou o f J ames Hoppe, Esq., Blackheath, Kent , Elizabeth, eldest daughter of John Adams, Esq., Woodford, On the 9th inst., at St. James's Church, Westminster, Aldis, to Emily Arabella Brome, of Upper Seymour-street, P° l. , man-square, d aug ht er o f t h e l ate Rev. John Brogue, TriDlty College, Cambridge. lED. On the 7th inst., at Cheltenham, Lucy, wife of William 00 I ' .- bech, Esq., of Farnborough, Warwickshire, aged 56. • On the 6th inst., at Ormsby, Lincolnshire, Charles Bu r " cll Massingbercl, Esq., aged 81. i. • s ort' On the 4th inst., while on a vi s it a t th e res id ence of 1115 Henry, enry at N or th ampton, Cecil Ileac,-Esq., of Devonshire-stree Queen -squa re , so li citor. On the 7th i nst. , M r. T homas John Butcher, of Regent-stre et, aged On the sth i ns t., at llaughley Park., Suffolk, William Crawl . ° rd, • Esq., in Ins 80th year. On the Bth i ns t., G eorge, t h e i nfant son of Henry Green, 1 : 14, of Blackwall. On the •20th of September, in the West Indies, aged 22, Tian of ° • White Merewcthe r , o f hi s M a j esty ' s ship Rainbow, second s " Mr. Sergeant Merewether. On the 26th of September Int, at DoMinica, William Hump of the Island of Antigua. On the 6th inst., John Thomas Thorp, Esq., Alderman for Ai d: gate Ward, and G o v ernor u s t h e l i on. the Irish Society of Loutil On the 6th in s t., at Wallingford, a ge d 56, M r. W. B. • for 30 years a solicitor in that town. • On the 6th inst., at Brighton, Mr. Richard Green, of S°util.. , ampton- place, Camberwell, aged 56. - - On tl!e 6th inst., i n hi s '2sth year, G eorge R o b ert, you ng,sr sou of the late Mr, Peter Paul Greiner, of yformwoad-street. London Printed and Published by ;ULTIMO YOUN G ' Of.. 11.2, Strand, at The S lot Offi ce , No. 114, Strand, in the count of Middlesex. "ts T IIE I Sir 1-1 'JOHN This Set:it - AI , 11 Great 13rit • libel terra ' 44 °fig the Ac Ind y infort .....'.....-••••••.......„,.............. Atrit. make Itlth a larg e re The CON S.ll r2nrepri s i ng I nte three divi, 're mare circus Farms (Us Ditto Ditto infn ad d'diacteti o ah n il aiilBl nog i; r q ; feels justitic ' r ental and raft THUD IT IS Trt (2 "'" t -tzar( At the 01(I SI :77 , tu r rh att;i o on l a e lp a s sEtehholi NN E 11 " 4 ' the Propric L Nee for z lar lthe square, h _" (l, to aiwa'yr,iarr3 Zidence Hill ti ,....) , ;(1ar 5 , at th taken best ''artieulars t 1 s B ogner, .) Garden, At the obl S o'Clock, by ,AN El I , l l' , is s ea t e d te• "Li Kit( ,2din, it is 'f i ii',"iPalty o f Offices a t o , d to b e oc 2P!nder it m 4 trast t o bi o ' et eontemplat 4 Pied by aw The presen . 4 1ac)n it is frc li e ~ c Q, to J u llaor )9 v be vie. t'it,4arien, Br b, W 14 4 • -;,elased t he plan. Ina °h e IT& Tiil , FOR' Which th e ti ni °lla 2disc stFrn an , ;e:line of 141.: crc:as th e P` ) lon , at Interoha 411* natural t he most ce ir e knwy n I t t Ate, at ' fe rY rear i t, f a h „,.._°Pport toinera, be e ,; rn 121_ o ne or :e niarnost i 'AEMp The Lc g i tt vIVE k,,. been wh i ° ol‘v. U NIT 111111TItliie' "nPtyinc: e S tith is Ntiderzt '4kY b °till Anat c ' V Y ro 1 4 T r ge 11 other A vkluabl N ewbu Alt ogo , Noble At t i le C qtal)e t N oble I oz and alto has bter kill be , 14 tile I . "r,:11 I