The Sun. — London, England, 1835-04-20 00:00:00

~.~-,_. ~i.~~ SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. The mere repetition of the names of the members of Cabinet will convince the country that the new Admi nistration does not contain the talent or the principle Which ought to entitle it to public confidence. It is, in fact, but a re-instatement of the rump of the Grey Cabinet, with the only man of 'superior ability which it contained excluded--we mean Lord Brougham, who, though his talents are 'not exactly those of a statesman, has achieved distinction as a debater, while not one-of the members of the present Cabinet has, in that or any other walk of public exertion, soared above mediocrity, if we except Lord Holland. Even he, who, with a suirit kindred to that of Fox, used to make the Senate resound with the impassioned thoughts and generous sentiments of a constitutional orator—equally hostile to despots and democrats—has long since sunk into mute indolence and contented obscurity. Over his intellect the poppy influence of place has diffused its narcotic effects. He has resigned himself to a sinecure and si lence. Ever since he stepped into the easy chair of the Chancellorship of the Duchy of Lancaster, which the Whigs were -at one time so anxious to have abolished, the classic eloquence of his patriotism has lost its voice. From the moment that the destinies of Europe were delivered up to the tu telary protection of Lord Palmerston and his pro tocols, he has seen the Cossack power that used to be the object of his indignant denunciation, growing daily in its giant strength towards universal dominion. He has seen it with philosophic indifference, and has never disturbed the dullness of common-place _debate by one eloquent appeal to English feelings and English sympathies on the ambition of Russia and the wrongs of Poland. And so the genius of Lord Pal merston is again to be inflicted on the foreign policy of England ! Again are Belgium and Holland to be blessed with the mediatorial services of the author of the abortive protocols, who, in the four .years'" speedy and final settlement," of ,their dispute, as the Whig Papers used to have it, contrived to make matters more unsettled than he found them, and who, if he bad died in that service a martyr to his diplomatic labours, could not have had a more appropriate monument erected to his memory than a pyramid of his own waste paper. Under his auspices, too, the Russo-Dutch Loan job was matured, and the gold of England went to replenish the ceders of the Autocrat, while Poland vet struggled in the agonies of existence with her bar barian oppressor. With the same vigilant Argus to watch our interests in the East, the genius of Britiih diplomacy was overreached and insulted by the nego tiation of the " secret treaty" between Russia and the Porte, which bound Turkey fast in the chains of Rus sian policy, and has laid the eastern world at the feet of the Czar. it was under the auspices of Lord Palmerston that the British fleet was sent to the North Seas in the season of fogs and -storms, in conjunction with that of France, to intimidate the King of Hol land ; but failing to excite any other feeling in the Dutch King and people than that of more resolute de fiance, it sailed back dishonoured to the Downs. Thus was the glory of the Nile and of Trafalgar tarnished by this disgraceful demonstration. The Anglo-Gallic convention, entered into at the instigation of the wily Talleyrand, produced great advantages to France, by reducing Belgium to - the condition of a French pro vince, but brought nothing but disgrace to England ; nor did the bloodshed which it occasioned advance the Belgic question one single step towards a settle ment. There it remains still in all the beautiful en tanglement of the Gorgian knot, whiCh, probably, like its antique original, the sword is destined to cut.' A fatality, indeed, seems to have been over all Lord Pal merston's diplomatic contrivances, proving that if he is not a most unskilful statesman, he is a very unlucky one. Never did the, cause of Don Carlos prosper as it has since the announcement of the quadruple treaty which the 'Whigs and their scribes told us would extirpate his cause, and crush his hopes for ever. From repeated " annihilations " have 'the Carlists revived to extinguish army after. army of their oppo nents, and vain have been the boasts and threats of the succession of Queenite Commanders-in-Chief, whom Zumalacarreguy 'has defeated and foiled, leaving to the whole of those Generals, one after the other, nothing but bitter disappointments and blasted laurels. As to our home policy, Lord Melbourne, who bowed the knee on a former occasion to the Irish Baal, is again intrusted with its direction. 'To him it belongs to lead to their proper destiny those " statesmen," if. we must by courtesy so call them, whose plots and in trigues drove Lord Grey from his own Cabinet, but not until they had already driven away Stanley and Grah a m, and Ripon and Richmond. If Lord'Mel bourne have the talents necessary to govern a great empire he must be exceedingly modest and bashful never to have given any proof of it during his whole political life. He was one of that section of the Whig aristo cracy that was opposad to all and every measure of Par liamentary reform, up to the time of the Whigs' accession to office. Now, though we were reformers when Lord Melbourne was not, we admit that the Noble Lord outstrips us in the race at present, for we cannot, like his Lordship and his colleagues, for any temporary ad vantage, leave the safe course of constitutional reform to earn the loud cheers of Repealers and Radicals, and to toil and pant along the path of destructive ambition, abandoning every former principle of action, and bringing to the affairs of a great nation no higher rule of conduct than what governs the politics of the hazard-table„ be ginning in chances, pursued in chicanery, and ending in a scramble. But has Lord Melbourne really made terms with Mr. O'Connell ? This was the substance of the question put by Lord Alvanley to the Noble Premier in the House of Lords on Saturday evening. This was the substance of the question to which Lord Brougham officiously interposed his powers of inter ruption to prevent an answer being given. In doing so Lord Brougham showed that want of tact and judgment by which he formerly did great mischief to his own party. If Lord MelbOurne, instead of being asked a question relative to the terms on which he c accepted office, and which the Noble interrogator had a perfect right to put, had been impeached of high crimes and misdemeanours at the bar of the House, and if Lord Brougham were his advocate, it would be very proper for him, if he knew his client had not the con sciousness of innocence to repose upon, to start up, and caution him not to answer any question that might tend to criminate himself; but Nisi Prius tactics are sometimes the very worst that can be adopted in the arena of politics. What would have been the infer ence all through the country if Lord Melbourne, acting upon Lord Brougham's advice, had declined-to answer the question ? Would not the universal nation believe that the Premier of England was bound hand and foot to the chariot wheels of the repeal Agitator, and that the first Minister of the Crown was only the first captive dragged in the insulting cavalcade of the Romish (not Roman) triumph ? Why should Lord Brougham, who, being excluded from the Cabinet, is only an out-door servant of the Crown, have been more forward in this matter than the Premier's Ca binet colleagues ? We cannot say, but certainly Lord Melbourne reproved that officiousness when he said, " Perhaps the Noble Lord was not greatly out of order in putting the question," and then proceeded to an swer it by saying that he did not coincide at all with Mr. O'Connell in opinion—that he entertained the same opinions as when the Coercion Act was under consideration—that he did not know whether he was to have the assistance of Mr. O'Connell or not, but most positively he had taken no means and had en tered into no terms to secure his support. Now this was all very well as far as it 'went. It showed that there had been no capitulation with Mr. O'Connell in precise terms— no regu l ar t rea ty o f surren d er an d submission drawn up and engrossed on parch ment, and formally signed. But as to the more important point, whether the Cabinet was constructed upon a basis which was calculated to conciliate Mr. O'Connell, the Duke of Buckingham applied the touchstone, when he reminded Lord Melbourne of the principle upon which the Cabinet of Sir Robert Peel had resigned, and asked him whether he was prepared to incorporate with his measure relative to Irish tithe the principle of appropriating the surplus revenue to other than religious purposes. In answer to this question, the Premier frankly avowed that he felt himself bound and pledged to .a.ct upon the principle of the resolution adopted by the House of Commons. This is a sufficient sacrifice, in all conscience, at pre tint, to the ascendancy of the repeal and Papal far:. THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1835. tion. It is enough to justify the kindling of the Popish bonfires on a thousand_ hills by the m)riads . of the " finest peasantry in the world," who cry, " Down with the heretics F' Let them be rooted out of,the land !" Mr. O'Connell is too politic to ask any thing more than this at present—repeal and the general up rooting of Protestantism will come in good time, and the reclamation of the confiscated estates of the Mile sians and the forfeited abbey lands. It is also sufficient to justify the union which is now taking place between all classes of Protestants in Ireland, and even the most respectable Roman Catholics, who see that a general derangement of property and subversion of society is threatened ; for it will be as difficult by and by to collect rent in Ireland as tithe at present, always excepting Mr. O'Connell's lackland " rent," which his patriotism had rather gather into his own coffers than allow, according to Poulett Thomson's phrase, to "fructify in the pockets of the people." But this is not the only thing that has been done to gratify and conciliate Mr:O'Connell, although no express terms have been made with him. Messrs. Perrin and O'Loghlen have been appointed the Attorney and So licitor- General of lielarfi—and this arrangement Mr. O'Connell has long insisted upon, especially as to the Attorney-Generalship. To mark this concession to his demands—this act of homage to his snpremacy the more strongly—Mr. O'Connell, immediately upon the writs being moved for in consequence of those appointments, seized the occasion to walk over ostentatiously from the Opposition side of the House to the Treasury benches, as much as to say " All that I ask at present as the price of my support is paid." His party understood it in this way, and cheered him. We have only to add that, whether Princes or Parliaments be prepared at any time to conciliate the enemy of the Protestant Church and State by-degrading and dangerous sacrifices, we have the greatest confidence that there is spirit and virtue enough in he nation to repudiate the unhallowed compact, and tto save the Protestant liberties and Constitution, which were purchased by the suffer ' inas and blood of our martyred forefather,—l.reee: inn- Herald. The fact of the new Cabinet being formed and in stalled in office, together with the list of names com posing it, has been before the London world since the publication of Saturday's evening- papers ; and upon that head there is little more to say, than that,_ with two .or three exceptions, it may be considered a re cooking of the Melbourne Cabinet dismissed on the 17th of last November. The differences are, that Lord Brougham, as a bale of damaged goods, has been thrown overboard, and that Mr. Edward Ellice, either from ill-health or from being in bad odour with his Coventry friends, will not accept his former office, or any other in this Cabinet. Lord Althorp's removal from the House of Commons had not of necessity re moved him from the Cabinet, though it had ren dered him useless to it. Barring these three, there was not a personage in the old Melbourne Mi nistry who has not a place in that which has just been constructed, nor is there, on the other hand, a single addition made but by the solitary per son of Lord Howick, as Secretary at War. Nothing can be a more ungrateful or painful task than that of pronouncing judgment on individual pre tensions to places of high importance—but it is allow able to state with regard to the new Government as a whole, that it is divested of almost every name which even amongst the Whig party themselves would present to the nation either the recollection or the hope of talents or services above the flattest mediocrity: Lord Grey is not there,—nor Lord Brougham (who, whatever else may be asserted of him, is unquestion ably not of the noble family of the Humdrums), nor Lord Althorp, the keystone of the Grey and Mel bourne Administrations,—nor Lord Stanley, beyond all comparison the ablest and most resolute of the living generation of active Whigs,—nor Sir James Graham, as incontrovertibly the best administiator that has belonged to them for the last 40 years. This Cabinet, in the selection which has been made of its members, displays another characteristic of Whig taste, besides its palpable and scarcely varying intel lectual mediocrity,—viz., its predominancy of the. aristocratic material. We observed a few days ago on that supercilious instinct of the Whigs as a party, which has always led them to look down upon, and, in, their political combinations, to keep at a distance, so far as they durst, individuals who had not, some smack of the peerage to recommend them. This essential arrogance of the leaders of the Whig party has marked their proceedings for more than half a century. It was felt not merely in their formation of the first Grey Cabinet of 1830, but in their demeanour towards, and treatment of, all its friends in the House of Commons, throughout the long Reform struggle, when even the most common-place social courtesies were withheld from the Ministerial supporters. In the present Cabi net see what a small proportion the private or untitled gentlemen bear to, those members of it who appertain to the nobility : out of the 12 there arc 7 lords—one, to wit, Lord J: Russell—a Duke's son, and only four to be found in the class of commoners, one of them being about to obtain a peerage* Is this from dearth of plebeian talent among the Whigs, or from a redun dancy of the lordly leaven ? But, at all events, is there much chance of the durability of such an Administra tion ? It represents but one interest of the three, com posing the motley opposition to Sir R. Peel's Govern ment. It bears no other mark but that of exclusiveWhig gory.While it shuts out the only recognised abilities among the Whigs, it sh,tits out also the British Radicals. It shuts out besides the Irish Repealers—finally, it makes war upon the whole body of Conservatives, English, Scotch, and Irish, double its own numerical and tenfold its moral strength ; and by way of ex pounding the principle or no principle on which he wishes it to be believed that he has constructed his Cabinet, the Prime Minister himself, in reply to a most useful question from Lord Alvanley, has slapped the door- with ostentatious violence in O'Connell's face. Now, we desire any man of the least pretence to politi cal or party knowledge in this country to say what prospect there is of a Cabinet enduring, which hae not a natural influence in the Houre of Commons over more than one-fourth of that assembly, and which sets out with proclaiming its entire discordance from the acknowledged views and more than half ripe pro jects of the only section of the House of Commons from which it can speculate on receiving the slightest extraneous help. What fell from Lord Melbourne on Saturday, is quite sufficient to satisfy the country how arduoue he feels the enterprise to be of legislating against the Church of Ireland, and how inevitable is the certainty of a breaking up between the Melbourne Cabinet and its Repeal and anti-Protestant supporters unleis it goes the entire length of dissolving the union. of the empire. We forbear to add more on the pre sent occasion, than that at such a crisis a Cabinet so composed and circumstanced may be considered as ren dering the executive Government a caput mortuum for any work of wholesome or effective legislation. It is a Cabinet which depends for its continued existence on the prosecution of ,measures openly condemnecl'by him who is its nominal chief. It is a Cabinet whose leader in the House of Commons feels himself so embarrassed by his own position as a Member of it, that he. has been forced to mystify his constituents through the medium of an address, one paragraph of which asserts what is, in effect, contradicted by the paragraph imme diately following, and which threatens a measure in re lation to the Church of Ireland which can be carried no otherwise than by the co-operation and under the pre ponderating influence of an anti-British faction, whose declared purpose is to overthrow that Church. The part which has been chosen by the Melbourne Cabinet is one requiring extraordinary poWers of statesmanship to realize it, a large numerical support in Parliament, and a vast weight of opinion throughout the country. The Melbourne 'Cabinet has none of these. It has in the House of Commons, even on questions where - all . its adventitious aids are brought into action, a niggard and precarious majority. It can command as a party little more than one-half of the votes on which the Conservative interest may reckon without distrust. Out of doors there is in many parts of England much enthusiasm on the side of its adversaries, and no where more than apathy in its favour. The House of Lords, the great concentrated Aristocracy of the Empire, though now alive to the necessity of large Reforms, views the present Cabinet with alienation and incurable alarm. Three-fourths of the intelligence of i.ti .~ -L.'.iA Kingdom, nine-tenths of the property, and at least a considerable majority of the Representatives of Great Britain are strenuous defenders of a Conservative Government. The adverse balance hcs been struck in the House of Commons by the Irish, who would destroy the Empire.—Times. The proceedings in the two Houses of Parliament on Saturday night will be perused with intense inte rest, particularly those in the House of Lords. Lord Melbourne, it will be seen, repudiates the idea of any compact with Mr.. O'Connell—says that he has no idea whether he shall or shall not have the support in the House of Commons of the Hon. and Learned Member for Dublin—and declares his firm adherence to all the opinions he has ever expressed or entertained of that gentleman, of his conduct, his policy, and his objects. Mr. O'Connell, on the other hand, has been going about town for the last week, telling everybody that he had had the offer of the Irish Rolls, with a peerage for the present Master, to induce him to re tire ; and, since the speech of Lord Melbourne, has been unsparing of his - invectives against the ingratitude and perfidy with which he openly ac cuses the Premier of having treated him, contra dicting, in the most express terms, every declaration of Lord Melbourne, and insisting that between himself and his Majesty's present Government the most perfect understanding was conceived by him to have been fully established. To reconcile these op posite statements seems difficult, if not impossible. Lord Melbourne is a nobleman who ought not lightly to be suspected of uttering what he knew to be untrue. But it is certain, on the other hand, that the compara tive probability of the two representations is wholly in favour of that of Mr. O'Connell. It is just possible that Lord Melbourne may have been deceived by some of his colleagues, as Earl- Grey was deceived in the instance of Lord Althorp and Mr. Littleton's traffic with Mr. O'Connell. But it is most certain that if, in the .present state of parties, Lord Melbourne has formed an Administration, and disnossessel of their seats i• 1 cc B iiceen ui cwenty of Ms own friends. without any ground to expect the support of Mr. _O'Connell, but on the contrary, with strong ground to expect (for his statement implies this) the active hostility of that influential Member of Par liament, the Noble Lord has taken a very rash and a very ruinous step, and one which lie and his party Will soon find great cause to lament.—Morning Post. We can imagine the mingled feelings of contempt and alarm with which the names of the individuals who constitute the new Cabinet will be received by the country. The Whig-Radical Administration is a second edition of the precious medley that was de prived of its political existence in November last, whatever of talent was the portion of that Ministry being carefully and completely omitted. When we first beheld the names submitted to the Sovereign we esteemed it a sorrN jest. But, alas ! the farce was a most melancholy production, merely comical in the absurdity. and folly of the dramatis personae; sad enough in its incidents, and probably is its catastrophe. To whom are the destinies of England. entrusted? To my Lord Melbourne, a Nobleman whose talents reach respectable mediocrity, First Lord. of the Treasury ; and to him is be added Mr. Spring Rice, as Chancellor of the Exchequer. Now, these individuals are the principal personages - in the new cast of the " Cabinet ;" yet who will pretend to say that the talents of both being combined, their acquirements united, any comparison can be instituted between them and Sir Robert Peel, whose loss as a Minister of the Crown is now deplored by all that the kingdom possesses of worth and intelligence ? But the Duke of Wellington is replaced by Lord Palmerston. This has very much the air of a bur lesque. Lord Palmerston, whom all parties agreed in ridiculing, again permitted to endanger the peace and hazard the honour of the empire ! And what con stituency will receive the Noble Viscount ? Tavistock cannot be spared, Malton is engaged, Calne is pre occupied. " Oh ! the new Ministerial press will ex claim, " only two Secretaries of State can sit in the House of Commons, and therefore (mark the there fore !) my Lord Palmerston is to elevated to the Peerage." Lord John Russell is Secretary of State, for the Home Department. Happy England—fa voured Ireland I We presume the Noble Lord had his choice of offices, and we have no doubt he is quite as fitted, for the one he has selected as for any other situation in the gift of the Crown. If the electors of Devonshire do their duty, a fact of which; we believe, there is no doubt, his Lordship, undisturbed by Par liamentary toils, will be enabled to give all his atten tion to the duties of his office. As the office of Privy Seal is generally considered a sinecure, we dare say Lord Duncannon will discharge its duties to admira tion. Lord Auckland is a good-natured, easy person, whose elevation to the First Lordship of : the Admi ralty, during the previous existence of ~the Melbourne Ministry, was considered a mere neutral appointment : he is not worse than his colleagues. Of Sir John Hob house, as President of the India Board, we need only observe, that he seems to have but one object in view, the diminution of whatever reputation he once en joyed, and we do not imagine he has any " stir plus." Mr. Charles Grant is appointed Secretary for the Colonies. Are the electors of Inverness-shire at their posts ? How agreeable for two of his Majesty's principal Secretaries of State to be without seats in the House of Commons. Mr. Poulett Thomson is again withdrawn from his counting-house to meddle with politics—" he loses a day to trade, and does not gain it to statesmanship." Lord Lansdowne returns to his ancient post as President of the Council. We will say nothing of the respectable Wobleman in question, because " de non apparentibus, et de non existentibus eadem est ratio." Sir Henry Parnell is, it appears, to share the delights of office, its rewards and quarter days, without a seat in the Cabinet. This will of course diminish his power of doing mischief, and is so far ad vantageous. Of Lord Mulgrave and Lord Morpeth we have already spoken ; it is unnecessary to recapitu late an unchanged opinion. Sir John Campbell is to succeed Sir Frederick Pollock, and Sir Wm. Follett is replaced by Mr. Rolfe? Who is Mr. Rolfe? What is he? Whence comes lie? He will, we suppose, at any rate have knighthood before his next and final expul sion from office. And the Chancellorship is to be put into commission, whether to humble and annoy Lord Brougham or to gratify him by another job is not yet quite clear. We will, 'however, say no more. A few days will demonstrate what hold such a medley is likely to take of the feelings and confidence of the English nation. Whether despairing of guiding or controlling the popular feeling; the true business of Ministers of the Crown, they will pander to the pas sions of the people, and array against the religious feel ing, the intelligence, and property of the nation all that is most violent and most unprincipled, the bankrupts in character and fortune, the desperate speculators, whose only hope is in revolution and anarchy, remains yet to be proved. Alas I former experience is an impressive monitor. We will, however, do our duty by calling upon the Christians of the land to be firm, united, and active, zealous in the defence of those institutions, whose preservation is inseparable from the existence of our religion, Monarchy, and laws.-- - --MorningPost. If Lord Palmerston's re-appointment to the Fo reign. office had not before appeared to us one of the most expedient selections in the recent arrangements, we should have been reconciled to it, if not entirely sa tisfied with it, from the violent abuse which, from all ranks in the Tory camp, has been so unsparingly showered on the Foreign Secretary. The Holy Alli ance, forsooth, with their emissaries, Messrs. Pozzo:di Borgo, Esterhazy, and Bulow, add the expression of their high displeasure to the venomous and malignant outcry raised by their Tory adherents .in this country against the choice which his Majesty has thought proper to make of a Foreign Minister Why not send an Envoy to the Court of St. Pe tersburgh at once to submit the appointment to his Imperial Majesty for his gracious approba tion, agreeably to the precedent set by the To ries in the appointment of Lord Londonderry to repre sent the country at that Court, merely because the ap pointment was acceptable to Nicholas ? No better proof could be given to the public of the liberality and honesty of Lord Palmerston's former Administration, than this ebullition of hostile feeling on the part of those whose tyfannical policy his been defeated in the south of Eliror? 11- al;.: 1— tiiat the Holy Alliance were not the dupes of the declaration of the late Ministers, that they would adhere to. the foreign policy of their predecessors. They made due - allowance for the necessities of the Tories, knowing - that their hearts were with them, and that when • the thing could be safely done, they would once more indulge their inclination in favour of despotism. The constitutional Government of Spain and Portnaal owe - their establishment to the liberal policy of Lord Grey's and Lord Mel bourne's Administrations, and will be equally sa tisfied with the Government of France at the' restoration to office of the Minister by whom it was directed. But while we thus congratulate his Lordship on the emnity of the emissaries of the Holy Alliance, we at the same time trust, that taking advan tage of the feeling in his favour which will be excited by the clamour of the Tories and their allies in the abso lute Governments of Europe, he will be more cautious in future to avoid the causes to which any unpopu larity he may have suffered in this country is to be as cribed—namely, his retaining a host of Tory under lings in employment in the several embassies, and dis posing of the large patronage of his office almost ex elusively in favour. of those whose liberality and attach ment to the cause of Reform there was the greatest reason to doubt. Hencef9rth the public will not for give, either in this, or indeed, in any other depart ment, a relapse into the weakness which preferred the appointment of waverers and interested conformists to known and decided adherents to the principles on which a reforming government professes to act. —Morning Chronicle: After one of the noblest battlei that was ever fought for British rights and British freedom—after one of the most desperate, as well as impudent, attempts that was ever made to domineer over the free spirit of the country, and check the progress of sound and consti tutional reforms—after the most disgraceful exhibition of tenacity to office ever manifested by-English states men, and the most unconstitutional attempts to poison the ear of his Majesty against their successors—we have at length the satisidei,ion u, 12; .;1J our readers a list of a new Cabinet, and of nearly all the' supporters or executive officers who are .to carry its liberal and enlightened policy into effect. But few days have been consumed in the com pletion of the task—and not many more will elapse before all those members of it for whom the Constitu tion requires that new writs should be moved, are re turned, with a seal of approbation upon them, from the constituencies to which they are again to appeal. Looking at the materials of the new Cabinet in the most plain and unprejudiced manner, we are inclined: to think that, as a whole, it cannot fail to command': the respect and confidence of the country. One more strong, in some respects, might unquestionably have been formed ; but perfection in political, as well as in other arrangements, is, we suspect, incapable of attain ment, and under the conviction of such being the fact, we boldly declare our opinion that it is not likely .to. be excelled by any other which, under all circumstances, could, at the present moment, have been formed. It is the Melbourne Cabinet again, with some omis sions—with some additions—and with some transposi tions ; and considering the manner in• which that Ca binet was dismissed—dismissed without a trial—there is a species of moral fitness—we will not add of mo ral revenge—in its all but complete restoration to office, after the most unceremonious dismissal that a Government ever received, and the most determined ex pression of attachment to it which is on record with regard to any previous Administration. The principal omissions are in the names of Lord Brougham on the one hand, and Mr. Edward Ellice on the other ; but the omission has been a voluntary omission in both instances—both having declined office, but both at the same time having declared their adhesion, not only to the Cabinet, but to its measures. The sole reason in fact, of Lord Brougham not being included in the arrangements, is to be found in the desire, expressed by him nearly four years ago, of seeing the political and judicial functions of the Lord Chancellor sepa rated, and of the determination of the Melbourne Ca binet that they shall now be separated, and that the country shall not be saddled ad infinitum with political Chancellors and political pensions. This is a great Reform, and speaks well for the future policy, of the new Government. With regard to the personnel of the new Cabinet, Lord Melbourne is, as he Ought to be, the chief ; and who, after his manly, energetic, and truly English-like conduct in the House of Lords on Saturday, will dare to say that he, is either unfit for the high office which he fills, or likely to baulk the expectations of all true Reformers ? Then, again, there is Lord John Russell, who has not only in the most skilful and vigorous manner, but in a manner evincing, under all circumstances, the greatest moral courage, turned out the Tories, and, we may add, carried, next to the Reform Bill, "the most important national resolution that ever received the sanction of the House of Commons. Who can object to him ? To Viscount Duncannon no objection is offered even by his enemies. He has received an im portant and delicate trust, and it is not to be doubted that he will execute it to the satisfaction both of the King and the people. Come we next to Sir John Cam Hobhouse--and has he not nobly redeemed the only error which he was ever accused of committing ?—and to the Right Hon. Poulett Thomson, and who has laboured with so much energy, perseverance, and vigour, to save the country from the. infliction of a Tory regime ? The appointment of Mr. C. Grant is also unexceptionable ; and that of Lord Palmerston, we may add, of the same complexion. There are few men in the House of Commons more able, if, indeed, any so able, in their respective departments. In the inferior departments we find two names which it is a matter of great gratification to us to mention—those of Mr. Fox Maule and of Lord Dahneny. They are both young men—but they are Liberals, and they are young men of great talent, and of greater promise. They are a decided acquisition to the new Ministry, and Sir Henry Parnell may be safely included under the same observation. There are, however., two names omitted in' the list of appointments, which we think that the country, in conjunction with ourselves, would have desired to see conjoined with the new Cabi net, not only as a matter of justice, but as a matter of gratitude, in one instance of important services ren dered, though not hitherto acknowledged—we allude to those of Mr. Bulwer and of Mr. Tennyson. Both would afford guarantees to a large portion of the pub lic, that large and liberal measures of Reform would be followed cut; and we believe that we may add, looking back to the records, not of the last session of Parliament only, but of many others now before us, as well as to other, matters within our knowledge, that few men have sacrificed so much for the sake of Reform, or promoted it to a greater extent than the Mem ber for Lambeth. Up to the hour, however, at which we write, several important offices re mained without occupants, and . it is not therefore, unlikely, that the two gentlemen to whom we have referred may be about to be appointed to them. In conclusion, we beg to state, in reply to the asseverations of the Tories to the contrary, that the return of the Members of the new -Ministry by their late constituencies is a matter of undoubted certainty. Lord John Russell may have a struggle for Devon shire ; but we have every reason to believe that it will be successful. For Mr. Poulett Thomson there is also a decided majority in Manchester—and indeed there is no Member of the new Government who, in conse quence of his change of position, has not a right, not only to expect, but to demand, the unanimous appro bation of his constituents. It would be strange, in deed, if, with a truly Reforming Cabinet, the Refor mers who carried the Reform Bill should not have energy and influence sufficient to make those sure of seats in the House who are determined to give them its best practical fruits..—Morn. Advertiser. The country papers abound with details of the ma noeuvres of the Tory party in getting up addresses to the King and Sir Robert Peel. We have already exposed the prac tices of these addresses—their tricks are pretty nearly the same all over the country. The Reformers, however, would do well to imitate them in one thing, and that is their union. A young man at Nantes, wishing to _take a bath in his own room, which he heated by means of a cylinder, filled with live charcoal, and put into the water, had the imprudence to get into the bath without removing the cylinder, in order tint the effect might be more gradual. At the end of three hours, his fiends entered and found him dead. It is presumed that he fi-etl'-‘ l l n'u l fterwards suffocated by the fumes of the charcoal. 'I ue, " 1'.'1771 and the body reduced to a state we cannot describe, POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. THE GREAT FORGERIES IN THE ClTY.—Christopher Charles Foster and J. King lifierpkij, were brought up for final examination. Mr. Whately, the barrister, appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Charles Phillips for the prisoners. William Robinson, of Symond's Inn, upon being shown a bill of exchange for 8801. drawn in the names of Murphy and Chestermap, did not believe that the name of Murphy was written by the prisoner of that name. He had seen the prisoner Murphy write. Lee, the police-officer, produced a letter which he said he had received from Murphy, on the 26th of March, pre viously to the apprehension of the prisoners. The letter expressed the writer's surprise at seeing his name coupled with such criminal transactions in the newspapers, and stated that his knowledge of Foster was merely professional, that the extent to which his friendship went was to the placing Foster out of the reach of those with whom he might be more disagreeably situated, that he (Murphy) would not walk in the officer's way for a few days, and that he would be forthcoming in proper time to show that he had nothing at all to do with the transactions. It further stated that the false information must have come from Josh. Hudson, particularly that part which stated the extravagant false hood that Foster had lodged 10,0001. in the hands of a re spectable publican, and that the said Mr. Hudson had boasted of his intimacy with the Lord Mayor.—( Laughter.) The LORD MAYOR—Who is Mr. Josh Hudson ? I ' don't know that I have the honour of his acquaintance. Murphy—He declares every where that he is on parti cularly intimate terms with . your Lordship. Mr. HoBLER---LHudson, the pugilist. He bears a very decent character, and . is in the habit of gettinc , poor fellows who are without employment work on board ;lip, and he is extremely respectful. A twopenny postman of the Lincoln's Inn-fields district had received three letters to deliver to Mr. Chesterman, of Lindoln's Inn, or Lincoln's InnfieldS, but he could find no such person in either place. A Mr. Benjamin Chasterman lived in Blackmoor 7 street. - Margaret Dew, iife of William Dew, of Tyso-street, Clerkenwell, knew Foster about two years. He might have called about half-a-dozen times at her house in the course of a year, through her niece, Jane Dawson, who lived with him. In March last she took in a letter directed to her husband, and s'.:e gave it to her husband. William Dew, the husband of Margaret, when he re ceived the letter went to a Mr. Bolton, a solicitor, of Red Lion-square, and gave it to him, being determined to have nothing to do with the subject of it. Mr. Bolton, upon being called upon by Mr. Whately to deliver up' the letter stated, that as 'a man professionally em ployed he was bound to keep the letter. A long argument arose.between Mr. Phillips and Mr. Mahon upon the part. of the prisoners, and Mr. Whately upon the _part of the prosecution on the right of Mr. Bolton to detain the letter. The LORD MAYOR believed the letter was kept back for the purpose of defeating the ends of justice, and that he was determined to commit Bolton, if he did not consent to give it up. Mr. Whately, however, should be satisfied if the wit ness promised to attend the Central Criminal Court with the-letter, and to give it up if required by the 'Judie. The Learned Counsel then again called William Dew, who gave very questionable evidence indeed. He believed that the letter alluded to was in the hand-writing of Foster. The letter contained' directions to him to give it to a re spectable solicitor, and he accordingly gave it to Mr. Bol ton, who had done business for him. He did not choose to answer the question asio what the letter contained. He did not know, for he would not have anything to do with it, and he gave it at once-to Bolton, and told him several times not to give it up. He never saw Murphy, till he saw him in custody: He received two other letters from Foster. 'He would not tell what they contained ; upon his oath he did not know, He burnt them. ' The Loan MAYOR—Upon your oath,•do you - mean to say, you knew akhing of the contents? Witness—Part of them I know'd ; Int r would'nt have nothing at all to do with 'em. Mr Whately—What were they about ? Witness—lf I tell you what they was about, I might as well give you up the letter I gave to Mr. Bolton. It was only about some furniture that was to be sold, and I was to sell it. Mr. Whatdy—Did the letter say anything about Mur phy ? Witndss—NO, not to my knowledge. Mr. Bolton. considered himself professionally employed on this occasion. He looked to be paid for his services out of the proceeds. He meant for carrying into effect the in structions contained in the letter. Dew was not at all re sponsible to him for payment. Nothing at all passed about the matter between him and Dew, who handed the letter to him as a professional and not as a private man. Witness would certainly attend at the trial and produce the letter if required by the Judge ; but he considered himself under the strongest obligations to keep possession of it. A police-sergeant named Avory was present when Murphy and Foster returned from Ireland. Murphy men tioned that the captain of the ship in which they had em barked was a treacherous vagabond ; that after paying him 70/. for the passage to New York he (Murphy) ripped his trowsers and gave the Captain 2001., and that upon finding he could get no more from them he went ashore and be trayed-them like ,a vagabond as he was. Mr. Whately then called upon the Lord Mayor to commit the prisoners. Mr. Phillips admitted that there was a case made out against Foster, ,but begged to know upon what ground Murphy could be detaine ? Mr. Whately said that Murphy was decidedly an accessory, after the fact, having assisted Foster to escape, knowing that he was guilty of felony. Mr. Phillips declared that there was not a tittle of evi dence to prove that Murphy had aided in the escape. Everything charged against Murphy:had clearly failed as to proof. The Lord MAYOR—I have determined, under all the circumstances, to commit Foster for trial ; and I shall re quire of Murphy two respectable persons as securities to the amount of 2001. each, and himself to the amount of 2001. to appear at the Central Criminal Court if indicted. Mur phy must give twenty-four hour's notice of bail. Murphy expressed himself satisfied. He wished to ad dress the Lord Mayor, but was desired by Mr. Phillips not to say a word more. He took notes during the in vestigation. Foster is not to be removed to Newgate for a few days ; and both prisoners were sent back to the Compter for the sake of convenience. The investigation lasted a consides able time, and the moment it was concluded the Justice room and avenues to it were cleared of one of the largest assemblages that ever appeared in the case of a criminal. LAMBETH-STREET. On Saturday afternoon, shortly after the public business of this office had been disposed of, Mr. Ball, a respectable tobacconist, residing at No. 12, Cable-street, Wellclose square, entered the outer office in breathless haste, and said he wanted to see the Magistrates to have their advice as to how he was to act in a case wherein gross imposition was sought to be practiced. Lee, the officer in attendance, informed him that the Ma gistrates had a few minutes before, having disposed of all the business, )eft the Bench, and would not sit there again until the evening. Mr. Ball then observed that he, Lee, might inform him on the hearing the particulars of the case, what he should do. He then proceeded to state that William Knight, an inexperienced young man, a relation of his from Branfield, near Reading, was on a visit at his house. While passing through the city during the forenoon, he had unfortunately been led, from motives of curiosity, to enter a mock auction shop, not a great distance from the Mansion-house. While there he was foolishly induced to bid for articles put up for sale, and urged on by the tricks of the Jews and " barkers," who are always found in such places, to • make purchases, which, by the bill made out, and including duty, amounted to 11/. 15s. Of this amount the young man had only 6/. about him, and this the auc tioneer took as a deposit, while he sent a porter home with the articles, and with directions not to leave them unless he paid the remaining 5/. II s. This balance the young man would have at once paid, but having to borrow the money from Mrs. Ball, the circumstance led to an inquiry as to what he required it for, and he then told that he had made some purchases at an auction in the city. He (Mr. Ball) at once suspected, from the numerous cases which he had seen in the newspapers of the tricks practised in such places, that his relation was done, and on examining the articles, which consisted of a writing-desk, tea-caddy, decanters, and some plated goods, he at once saw that his suspicions were perfectly realized. Beside§ this, his relation assured him that he had never bid for or purchased several articles which were down in the bill, so that the whole affair was a most gross attempt at imposition. Lee refused to give any advice whatever on the subject, and told the applicant that, he must act entirely on his Own discretion in the matter. HATTON-GARDEN. GlN.—Sarah Serle was charged with drunkenness. A policeman of the N division found-the defendant lying insensibly drunk in High-street, Islington, on Thursday, night. The infant, then at her breast, he discovered a few yards from her, and for some time afterwards he entertained serious apprehensions for its life. Mr.. BENETT—Good God ! do you mean to say that that poor babe was exposed to the weather on so cold a night as Thursday? Policeman—lt was, Sir ;it had nothing on but a cap, a flannel petticoat, and a frock. It was almost dead with cold. _ _ _ Mr. BENETT—What is the age of the child ? Police• Man—About six months. We sent it to Islington "crk house to be taken carenf until the mother was sober. Mr. BENETT (to the wretched woman) —Pray have .y es any more children ? _ Defendant—Yes, I have five beg this one. Mr. BENETT—Where are they ? Defendant _At Mr. BENETT—Who did you leav ain care of them ? De' fendant—No one. 1 ft Mr. BENETT—Where was your husband whe n you 'el home ? Defendant—At work ; he is a wire-worker- the hope you will look over it this time. I seldom g ets worse for liquor. Mr. BENETT told her she appeared such an abandorido and worthless woman, that it would be a waste of words t say anything more to her, and he sent her about her busiees, Several other females, who described themselves to 7 , married women, were also charged with drunkenness, an after being reprimanded, were discharged. CORONERS' INQUESTS. DETERMINED ACT OP SELF-DESTRUCTION AT THE SAXON OP:" SADOR'S IN PARK-STREET, GROSVENOR-SW/ 4,E ' 1, i ,11 On Saturday evening at eight o'clock an inquiry, 'qu", lasted several hours, took place at the residence of 13° Gersdorf, the Saxon Ambassador, 20, Park-street, Grobre venor-square, before Mr. HIGGS and a very respeet%, Jury, to inquire touching the death of Augustus Eadrlcbie aged 29, valet to his Excellency, who put a pe riod 10' existence by shooting himself through the heart. biN On the arrival of the Coroner a letter was handed to by Baron Gersdorf, in which his Excellency claimed .bo; right as an Ambassador from a Foreign power in a P P Ie , an inquiry in reference to one of his estbblishmen t • h a t however, would waive such upon the present occasion, protested against it being taken as a precedent. The His Excellency Baron Gersdorf being sworn d eice that the deceased was his valet having en tered his serclhe in Germany about six months ago. In November last , he (the Baron) came to this country as Ambassador from Court of Saxony, the deceased accompanying his estab Iis0"; ment. Between seven and eight o'clock on Friday 0 211 ' t te last witness was apprised by some of the doniestics tat report of a pistol had taken place in the decea s ed's h 1 1 3 °iv e Witness immediately proceeded to his (deceased's) ite. room door, which was fastened inside, but, without Iles 05 tion, he burst it open, and discovered the deceased 131 o f' the floor with his face downwards. There was a rola gunpowder and smoke in the room. Witness, in tl i siby ment of excitement, called out to the deceased, s te have you committed so rash an act ?" but the u nforta ly man only groaned, and immediately expired. On e x de' tion of his person witness discovered the shirt of tuedeatb ceased on fire, and subsequently ascertained that the was occasioned by a pistol bullet which had lodged in ser , body. On the first report of the pistol being hea rd vant was despatched for Mr. Elsgood, a surgeon, Of 0 6 street, who promptly arrived, but of course his pr esenc " of no avail. In answer to questions from the Coroner and Juf , ro ' a n, Excellency stated that the deceased, who was a siagl a ete was of good connections in Germany, but from unfar'" a nd circumstances his expectancies had been frustra ted, at his condition in life at the time of his death, did not tar accord with his notions, which were very most! i t he tages were also great, being well versed in Of the is man authors, particularly Schiller, whose .enthusiastie 'co? he (the Baron) was of opinion had made a gre at , rh il ltie sion on the mind of the unfortunate young man.' to ceased, as witness had understood, had been bre ( ' military service. Mr. Imeson, builder, of Park-street, deposed to 5' to be the deceased on Thursday last, when he appe ared extremely dejected. ,„h e 1) 0 There being no further evidence the Jury viewed "dct / of the deceased, after which they returned a Ver oi's " That the deceased .shot himself, being at the tiro state of temporary mental derangement." The investigation lasted until a late hour. Saturday an inquest was held at the Raven Inn , sea, to inquire touching the death of Mr. J. EP Ps• Mr. William Everett, brother-in-law to the decease"! siding in Battersea-fields, gardener, had known the decease° about thirty years. During the last three weeks d ec Il i had been in the habit of coming to sleep at his heus e h ' ini 0° usually rode in an omnibus. Witness's wife ssivi o ibor ° ' Wednesday morning, at his residence, No. IA f when he promised to visit them the same night. ai d° nerally arrived at seven o'clock. As they heard Oa T O him, and it being a tempestuous night of wind an ra ieg . they thought he had deferred coming. The ne xt (Thursday), witness was informed by a boy that a lying near a gate, which is a back entrance to the ws , t 1 Witness proceeded there, when he observed that it , d e ' deceased, who appeared without any signs of life. ceased was shortly after taken to the workhouse. J a e' The beadle here stated that Dr. Epps, the decs B9O " ~ came down on Thursday night, and gave it as irsgetel that his father died of spasms, by which he was much n f Or Verdict—That the deceased died by the visitation THE MARKETS. J. .11..C4 .111.1-1.11-Es-Cs .L Vig/ (,OUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING LA!:„.-100 . Wheat. Barley. I Oats. Bean' , ...no. Per Quart-_.r. 42 s. to s. a to a. a. 31 to s. I. !, 33 42 25 28 17 20 31 / Narpeth 31 37 26 28 17 22 32 Penrith Sheffield 41 33 21 7, / Winchester 33 45 27 34 25 26 42 7, 0 ,0 ' Per Bushel. s. d. s. d.' s. d. e. d. s. s. d. s. d. -COO 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Carmarthen..........153 6O 32 36 , 20 28 0 0 I Cowbridge--, o'o 6 6 3 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 5 6 9 .:A „ 0 Newcastle (Staff.) 8 0 89 4 6 50 3 0 34 5 0 c n u 0 0 Northallerton 7 0 9 3 3 6 4 6 3 3 4 0 5 6 ",; 7 0 ,, v 0 0 80 40 48 30 34 6 0 „- 0 0% 1 1 Swansea 69 '7 039 40 24 26 0 0 0 0" Warwick 80 90 30 46 20 33 5 6 " 0 0 04 Per 8011. Barnardeastle.— 90 11 68 0 86 48 50 86 1() 0 a ° 0 9 96 106 69 80 49 73 77 0 Richmond Stockton ..—. 9 0 'lO 086 9 1 ' 40 5 4 80 WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.—ApriI 11'01343; Of, f 0 ane WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET.—Apr iI Wheat, Red, Norfelk and Suffblk —B. 35 8 . to —s. one --- Lin. and Cam. —s. 06s. to 04, --- Yorkshire — B. sis. to - - s• one ,- VF hite - • five -- Foreign, Red — B. —B. to . White —s. —5. to f ive Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk 90s. to gas' ------ Lincolnshire ---- Yorkshire %Vold Foreign Beans, Old -- New Oats, Potato Poland —s. 335 2 2 ;1 .. . t i t tooooo o ° 5,2.3 1 5 ! o; 6] eceee ei vii, f , Friezland and Small -a. 16s to Mealing Shelling • * r Malt tine 415 P c IS 17s, 38s. , s' ; Rapeseed CORNWALL MARKETS. Calculated at A gallons to the bushel.) J• ( 1, t° 1 1 1 6. 0 ? 0 0 , 9 0 - u 6 ". 0 6 o -- 0 0 0 90 0 f Wheat Barley. a. d. to s. d. 0 17 0 Truro Helstone St. Austell.. Bodmin - 0 18 0 Liskeard I) 16 6 Launceston .... ....... 0 19 6 7amelford Penzance 17 6 16 0 I 7 6 s d. to s d. Q 10 3 _0 9 0 0 10 -0 9 6 0 9 _0 9 v 9 0 10 0 _ 0 g u BIRTHS. feof tlO/ On the 19th inst., at the Island of Portland, the John Harington, Rector, of a daughter. s the 11 • 4 On the 15th inst., at Aldbury, Herts, the lady - Galloway, 17th of a son. the On the inst., in Bedford-place, Russell-squa re ' jtic ? Geoe Burnand, Esq., of a son. her , O rg n the 17th inst., the lady of the Rev. James flews mond, Surrey, of a son. 0 0 '`. MARRIED. f th e On the Ist ult., at- Florence, according to the rites l h e org - r t Church, and on the following day at the villa of Sir he Co a cer; mour, Resident Minister of his Britannic Majesty at t e tri ° d ie Florence, in Tuscany, by the Rev. E. Peacock, D elti t h cla y ° .gialegnO, a Noble of Cephalonia, to Louisa Harriet, fear poe of C. Scott, Esq., residing at Pisa. .0e 6 f r On the 15th inst., at Twerton, Wm. Massy, E s q •' Sir Hugh Dillon Massy, Bart., to Elizabeth Caroliuote.s, illt f niece of the late John Griffith, Esq., of Beeks-hill, On the 15th inst., at Twerton, Henry Prater , I t Lia t e l he t` Middle Temple, Barrister, to Elizabeth Maclean, el ue e s o cl r ja rl . of the late Charles Kyd Bishop, Esq., of Barbadoe% tha t i- c "; Samuel Edwards, Esq., formerly Solicitor-Genera 0, eli t.tve, In Kells Church, John Young, Esq.. M.P. for the 5 0 th e to Adelaide Anabella Tuite Dalton, step-daughter o ,', L^', ‘ o' o of Hertford. The Marquis" manufactureaveaw the fair br,uei attired in a robe of lace, the of the town ° l ad was attended by nine bridesmaids, all dressed in embr °l of Irish manufacture. -------- O tt DIED. ~,,,t,oo i i for O m n er t l h y e i‘ r en th ib l e . n r st o . i Cinoußnreyilanasttoßno-msqbuaary,e, John EIP /- or aged 64. d the A On the 15th inst., Charles Edward )odd, Esq. , -- or O il Temple, Barrister-at-Law. On t 17th inst • m , re lict o ontagu-square, Ann, it, Robbins, Esq., formerly of Pileivell, Hampshire. , „4.01. re , ' t , On the Bth inst., at Hull. aged 78, Mr. George 1 / 7 .' 3 , e - r oi l Ow' r' c On the 3d inst., at Keynstone Mill Mrs. Jane 5",,,. t0 r, ' ~ of the late Mr. Luke Waterman, of Tull-ant Ru s "` ~610 1;g aged 71, ~ , e ip flo o On the 16th inst., at Bath, Mr. Ewens. He the f ° (1 o'clock on the preceding evening, ;rid died at sil ' 9° (n al' i' lilJ morning. ,te.- ~,. t Lately, the Rev. J. Hubbard. The unfortunate gr , '„bic, i ," i , 0 . : long been subject to an occasional depression of 51 4 ,!: ol ol o ol' latterly oppressed him to such a degree, that on tn ii i g se , tw S h u orr n et d nh a ,, y, the 29th ult., he was discovered hanging in f t. ., ~e iv; ort Antingham. On the 12th inst., at Ockbrook, , in his 75th yea t f o it o , derick William Foster, Bishop of the Church of the u,3305 c H om er m ts o , n a l; e c d a .4 ll 7 ed . Moravians. y, „ of P ic On the 15th inst Mary, wife oH. Belch, •r' s q" On the 16th inst., in his 19th year, 0 1 1' 41° 0 f a t " Mr. John Wood, of Great Coram-street. On the 15th inst., Charles, Edward Dodd, Esq . ' Temple; Banister-at-law. William Walton, vie , ;0 , 4 ' 1 1;P 4 London: Printed and Published by 1111)11D 0 yo joe 112, Strand, at The Sun Office No. 112, Strom t' of Middlesex. the Col. th e II t•VarnrPri C eloeel Ja Lai m e , kr.. j " Th o my j ohn • T tr. r 1 10 .4 1 an Altiern, kr. a cu p h ‘l,l44l,ll::l3:;..,:erteotr.lo;i T i4l:ol,o,t A hisiu l t, . hEAF 'e 1... it of ditto Ira torithairP Nv et :l• Als < - -. tlenci LE GS , T. SERs I 1 eII ARL L'eet Er.. F • kkishionable B •: x3 lack n r.l in lc!re a p ,, , eat v . roy ..ti ei . „...artety ,t waisteos '4:11_110 assor Lklit7 4, whiel ' 4lll '4' and st . r. c,,, rep T, 1,...„?1il t i i ., N NE. e s "'AL i It t ,.°f th e iti k _ Le, 1 ,..._, ert ,:goitt.,lll Townes, ttle w e l l rvnes, 1 4 s • i° Af e a Z n tacy l i gh state nl kot,, 'ate ticl Cett'stB:i ple stat i t 4,1i,„ 1 :°: , with A r .4ll abl e l'ieril If , . e p te. • ti`eet' Pared only ' I N ` - ountx: Ne_11_,...._-street. 3 °l fl / 4 4 /11( : 11 31l3 Tt • WU/ c A tTH E '• iN PA; I I ` J NST] k Nil D entist 'cl ' ° P GRE, r ifkr' l l, ;" IN ec YE ES ti l i t t r l ll r e T EE'A l iri, N tliis ,r th e h th it t ,4ll - A i ll °d the e . r 41 ),. etr opoii 1 1 :,tlj e , gen ke h t LTI/ E E 3 , itris ' , 80 u th CON;, Th e I' fast " 8, wit tltE lerti e ; et N L .2 44 i l'13;, °° c ‘ t ri .1\ Al,','ekse ii tb Itie ' uRAL ~.' l 4 ;l l ,4 )a ble gh t ( "141 8 : 4 Zce of / of Artieti Ott tA ik , H I yr?-'....LIAL], A ti i t , - 1 ,,.. B CO', Ili:t't ' ' 4 e Ast( ItatC . :l 4l If tect' t i . e ions ei 1i i k i marntt l gthen,i er '' e nt pl 1 1 , i,,,• rn, exert I,l,:kttbus4gestion ,Noljon., Plate h ,1,5 3 , t,. spiri ts 4 , :. ,„,,, t., con v„, , ,,,, , 1 0t11 i n 'Ph n "al in ~' 4 1( Ysleia g' •41 4 L n, by ft,' 5 (1. ' %don )' l lt t . S°1 ( 1 also,' h t, k, Z t ; lintle 'kt Sur 65 H. t,,NSe r e "f 0 4 , .lif ora 3:-I l trc Y°lchct• Mortonh V i el a !' 1) e ti 1 11 es L P c At, °, k.' ond4 1 1 1 t k I ngsto o • thet is r e edl,elnes. 4nisite t -! j z -- 4) ; sPuri o o ILI3 )3 111 4 at ~, 4 -EAR: I P s er ior il . tiv tlied 1, ett - zeell e a k ` l l /11 ° I t 6 "' t t Pr4 l 2_ ll l to at r e e r n / b N I . or e , - watt] t4 1 .1:' ,1 by A cte I,,Net, 6 d• • ~i l t ls. 'and v yenta jd .., e 4 C 4t ' a ' B° ' ' 4 1% 44 de ? 11 4 ,1 pa A t ali t& the , 11,,'AL . nt4 0f 1, Perin,d Ali . . uea ' M t bi t, t.:4 the ' , lii SIA, 2 ) bNt e A Co 41.5rt abl '4e- ti k , , 4 , tit I,l l i' bo o `nat it k ' l i 111 LIE ACS'S p o 4 l' il 4t "tfi Wl3l t‘ he. 4 ,, a Belie tl i'la t R OSE \ 4 a• in Wtt` ) -id , , R a per -4 we,lfing sit °, , " ..11 , °ILI Mefisn r