The Sun. — London, England, 1835-11-23 00:00:00

SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC JOURNALS. Two or three days ago we asserted that a revulsion . of sentiment was beginning to show itself every '6 here on the question between the Ministers and the Conservatives of Great Britain. So long as the Ca binet of Lord Melbourne was supposed to be, and af fected to be, a Cabinet of mere Whigs, aiming at no further innovations in our government than such as might come within the range of a bona * fide reform of abuses, and in conformity with those principles on which the old Whigs of England hadalways professed to act, by upholding and defending the staple institutions of the oountry—King, Lords, Commons, and Church—so long. we say, as that delusion lasted, the Melbourne Ministry continued to receive a fair degree of support from its accustomed friends and well-wishers, the old habitues of Whiggism, who had known and served tinder it in its better days. There was from the first, indeed, visible amongst Whigs of all descriptions " out of doors," and within, a sort of undefined uneasiness, at the alliance into which the fag. end Cabinet was forced by the harsh alternative of sharing power • with O'Connell and the Popish functionaries of Ireland, or with Sir Robert Peel and the Con servatives. The first was a sacrifice of honour only ; the second would be a mortification to party jealousy, spite, and hatred. The spite, however, was Indulged ; what was to become of " honour" was a question left for the chapter of accidents to settle, and settled it has been, unfortunately, fatally for the Whigs. Two or three facts have occurred very recently, and arc detailed or noticed in this day's Times, illustrative 'of the rapid evanescence of the still existing Cabinet, and to which we shall turn presently. But with re gard to the progress of public feeling, it was given out originally, that the course of policy to be pursued by Lord Melbourne, &c., would obtain the support of O'Connell and his:myrmidons purely on the same foot ing as that on which the English Liberals would afford their assistance to the Melbourne Government, viz.— that of a general confidence that measures of a decided and vigorous tendency towards promoting the cause of "eonstitutionalreform" would be more practicable under a feeble Whig_ than under a strong Conserv a ti ve Ad minstration. To us and many others the opposite pro spect was far more likely to be realized, and events prove that we were right, but that is not the present question. The cloven foot was not long concealed. Every step taken in the government of Ireland, and not only that, but the spirit which pervaded every act of the Govern ment, great or small,—the language with which it was accompanied, and the manifest though tacit encou ragement given to the outbreak of factious black • guardism in both countries, much of which we deem it an honour to have bad directed against ourselves, — the all but exclusive patronage beStowed on Irishmen, avho had long been notorious for their abhorrence of our Protestant institutions, and of the British name, — the threats thundered forth against the House of Lords, for its daring to sustain the part of an independent House of Legislature, assigned to it by the unwritten and the written law of England—threats first issued' by the King's Prime Minister from his place in Parlia ment, next re-echoed by the King's Attornies-General in both countries, in their addresses from the hustings, to a population well enough inclined to plead in excuse for any treasonable offences the recorded . license of the law officers of the Crown,—and, .finally, the ag gravation and frightful significancy, superadded- to all the foregoing announcements of exterminating war fare against the Constitution, delivered by O'Connell (that precious Whig gentleman !) on his mission through the North—menaces which did no more, how ever, than give a complete form and development to that outline of destruction previously indicated by the offi cial tools and creatures of the agitator ;—these insignia of meditated revolution, followed up by the disclosures to which the Times has been instumental, of the acts perpetrated, the wickedness exhibited, the atrocious and abominable despotism established over the Roman Ca tholic multitude in Ireland by their aspiring though brutal priesthood—all taken together, all framed and destined to one disastrous end—the overthrow of the State and utter dissolution of the empire—were abundant, and more than abundant, evidences, that the ,Melbourne Cabinet had at its formation hung - out false colours, that O'Connell and the Popish hierarchy, and he English revolutionists, were not subsidiary ,to the so called " Melbourne" Ministry, but that Lord Mel bourne and his colleagues were tributary to them,—that not only has the cause of Protestantism been sold to .ripaeions Popery, and that of freedom to priestly per secution, but that ancient English Whiggism itself has been. broken up and sold piecemeal to the demon of anarchy and civil discord. The Rump-Whig faction has rebelled against its ancestors, and become a par ricide before. it was a traitor. It was time then (was it: not ?) that the old friends of Whig principles and of freedom, as their forefathers understood the term " freedom," should pause and gaze round, and ascertain whither it was, and in what direction, those - ideklesS Ministers who had usurped the helm of the State were on the point of steering. When the pilot is the most drunken man on board, it is, we say, time for the best disciplined crew to look about theni. We begin to see everywhere symptoms of this, however tardy, circumspection. A stupid attempt has been made to connect the letter of Sir Francis Burdett to Brookees Club with.a supposed change in the political feelings of that Hon. Baronet. We. have already stated what is evident on the face of the letter—that the . Writer of it was most studious and anxious to divest his propositiOn for inflicting a condign punishment on O'Conn e ll o f a ll p o liti ca l bearing and character what soever. Th e a dd ress was t o th e feelings of gentlemen, notef Whigs, and will yet be found of more impor tance than some of those who sneer at it have courage to admit of. But it is not with Sir Francis that our present subject connects us. There are other Whigs, and stanch ones too, who feel it essential to .their own character, and to the public safety, to appeal, as Rorke set them the bright example of doing, from the " new Whigs to the old." In Northampton shire, Sir G. Robinson, formerly a member and sup porter ofthe Whig party, who proposed the present Lord for the county in the year 1832, has now given Mr. Hanbury a flat refusal to vote for him,—and why ? Because, on O'Connell's declara tion at Newcastle that "the Whigs now are not the " Whigs they were five years ago," and on his (Sir (George's) own opinion, that the " present Whig Ministers have the violence, without the honesty, of professed Radicals," (which is luminously just and true), that they are about to sacrifice the Church of England and Ireland to appease the insatiate appetite of Irish Priests and English Dissenters, that their organ and Lord Mulgrave's patron, O'Connell, has declared war against the House of Lords, and that Mr. Hanbury, the Whig candidate in opposition to Mr. Maunsell, is still.a supporter of that same repro bated Ministry. He, Sir George Robinson, so far from giving Mr. Hanbury his vote and interest, wishes 11eartily.that he may be defeated. - This from a ge nuine ! Again, read the addreSs of the Hon. awl:Rev. Littleton Powis, another stanch Whig, to his- tenants and parishioners, at Titchmarsh, in the sane county of Northampton, in further testimony of a revolution already begun—a revolution in political feeling—an abandonment of dishonest men by the ho nest ; and then answer, whether there be not yet hope for England, or whether there still remains a spark of it for the forsaken of their principles and their country, the unhappy vassals of those arch enemies of Great Britain—" Popery, slavery, and arbitrary power.".._ _Times. We insert in another column a letter from Mr. Cleary, so well known for the share he formerly took at Westminster meetings, on the subject of Sir Fran cis's Burdett's foolish letter. We could easily add to the instances given by Mr. Cleary of Sir Francis Burdett's skill in the vulgar tongue ; but really it would be giving too much importance, to the matter to ttreat it in any other way than as tlti l stupid effusion of an old man in his do lab.,who has forgotten both his principles and the pant :he himself: acted on the public stage, but who seortig 'to sniffer annoyance because now that Reform is crfri t the'only : question on which he could speak to fr• i Nrppe„ :k;A br Sir, Francis was never able to utter +-- on any other) he is no O'Connell occupies a as the champion of etter is an effusion of 14 UM - 11191" - • •-•••,.• tter two int It.zyije6 fences roger th • Mr. rge s e, ,000 1 Als.Ankik • 1 • 4.--:4 ` 4 );.: ;4 \ !` %u no 33-10 imbecility and jealousy combined. Sir Francis never liked to have a rival near the throne, and his conduct to poor Paul showed him a stranger to kindness or ge nerosity ; but in his better days, if he had wished to stab Mr. O'Connell, he would have gone to work with more dexterity. As it is, people are only surprised at the blunder he has committed in reproaching Mr. O'Connell for using foul language, he himself having been distinguished above all men of his day for the of fensiveness of his epithets.—Morning Chronicle. SIR FRANCIS BURDETT. TO THE EDITOR OF THE MORNING CHRONICLE. Sir,—lt is an old sayin g , "that those who live in a glass house should not be the first to throw stones." I am, in deed, much astonished and pained that Sir Francis Burdett, of all men living, should lend himself to the most unwar rantable species of calumny which day after day appears in the Times newspaper against Mr. O'Connell. In truth it was recommended, some weeks ago by that paper, that something like the present attack should take place. How ever, notwithstanding all the Times, Mr. Raphael, or Sir Francis can do, Mr. O'Connell still retains the confidence of the Irish nation, and a great portion of the English and Scotch, to throw around him their protecting shield. It is melancholy to think that the once Radical Burdett should now turn round on the Radical O'Connell ; and for what purpose ? Why, to do him as much injury as he possibly can. But, at all events, I have heard Sir Francis Burdett re peatedly use as violent language as Mr. O'Connell ever did. I cannot forget that, in the year 1818, at a meeting held in Palace-yard, lie used language himself against the Mi nister of the day, on a par, to say the least of it, with any used by Mr. O'Connell. On one occasion Sir Francis stated, " that he concurred with all that had been said with regard to the unconstitu tional conduct of Ministers and their Parliament ; but espe cially in reprobation of the language of that Minister (Mr. Canning), who could not be deemed a legislator—who was, in fact, a MERE BUFFOON, playing- tricks upon that stage of corruption, the House of Commons. In that House he had lately heard this buffoon make the agonies of an aged prisoner the topic of merriment ; and he firmly believed that in no other assembly if gentlemen in England, or the civilized world, would such mirth be tolerated as - he .wit nessed upon that occasion with disgust." Bravo, Sir Francis! And notwithstanding this, as was observed by Mr. Cobbett, the Baronet stuck his knees in the back of .this very self same Mr. Canning, when Sir Francis -changed seats, and went over to ." this buffoon," in the House of Commons. - Although the line of acting of Mr. Canning was not such as a Radical Reformer could have wished, he was man, the world knows, of superior talent, and as an orator left very few behind him ; he was, in fact, any thing but a " mere buffoon," an expression that " one member of a civilized community ought not to be permitted to apply to another ;" and yet Mr. Canning, who c-as, I believe, a member of, Brookes's, did not, nor any one for him, endeavour to get the Baronet expelled. Again he said, " What was to be thought of Lord Sidmouth, who was not now to be regarded as a British Secretary of State, but what was called in France a Lieutenant de Police. The person who employed Oliver, the spy, was applauded by vital Christianity (alluding to Mr. Wilberforce), which might more correctly be called mortal Christianity ; for during the last quarter of a cen tury it was to be seen actively employed in opposing every measure conducive to the interests of humanity, or the ad vancement of freedom." And speaking about a new order of spies, the Baronet likewise said, " What a spectacle ! a medallion suspended by a blue ribbon, with an impression on one side of Judas, or the knavish High, Priest, who . gave Judas the thirty pieces of silver for betraying his mas ter. What an epitome would that impression present of Church and State policy. Then, on the reverse side, he would have vital Christianity, with an inscription on the rim, Are •we not brothers ?' This vital Christianity and Lieutenant de Police might be recorded as patrons," [see Stat:sman and other papers of March 24, 1828,]. and yet Lord Sidmouth nor Mr. Wilberforce took no notice of this very severe attack. " Was this the language which decent society had a right to expect ?" Cannot Sir Francis Burdett, who has gone through the varieties of a bargain with a boroughmonger for a seat in Parliament, and a con test for the county of Middlesex, which cost him 80,0001., and after wards accepting the - unbouglit return for West minster, divine to what uses the paltry 2,000/. received, after a great deal of trouble, from that worthy, Mister Alexander Raphael, by Mr. O'Connell, was applied in a six days' con test for a county larger than Middlesex ? As to the Duke of Wellington, whom every man must admire and respect for his military and some of his political character, if I mistake not, I beard Sir Francis use worse and more bitter language at his dinners given at the Crown and Anchor, to celebrate the purity of election, than. ever .was used by Mr. O'Connell. The Duke of Cumberland is too immaculate a character for me to have anything to do with, one way or the other, so I leave him to Sir Francis to " produce a strong feeling of disgust, not unaccompanied by a sense of humiliation and shame." . But a truce with reviving by-gone. recollections . . It is, however, lamentable to find the ornament of the age in which he lived, and one who had the confidence of the country at one time centered in him, give himself up to be a despicable t0:. , 1 for doing injury to a man engaged in deli vering his country from despotism more foul tan ever dis graced a nation. What Sir Francis or his new allies, the Times and Mr. Raphael, can say or do, will not in the smallest degree depreciate Mr. O'Connell (for that is the point they aim at) in the opinion of Irishmen, or of every good and valuable man in the community. If, however, Brooks's Club should, on the recommendation of Sir F. Burdett, do so foolish a thing as to expel Mr. O'Conn e ll, for doing that which - I have shown the Baronet himself was guilty of; what would be the result ? Why, it would be exactly this—that the public would look upon Brookes's Club as a club of fools ; and Mr. O'Connell, " rousing himself like a strong man after sleep," shaking off all th e filth endeavoured to be heaped upon him, and casting it back to its original employers. I remain, Sir, Your very humble servant, Alfred-place, Bedford-square. THOMAS CLEARY. Not a week passes in which we have not to record one or more flagrant instances of inhumanity and neglect towards the destitute poor in some of the metropoliten parishes. In our paper of Saturday two instances are recorded, as having occurred at the Marylebone Police office, both of them, but one especially, reflecting any thing but credit on the parish in which the wretched sufferers alluded to were found. The parish in ques tion is that of St. Pancras, one of the largest, if not of the wealthiest, in the metropolis ; and over whose parochial legislature Radicalism delights to revel in uninterrupted sway. We were many years ago among, the first to advocate the throwing open of parish ves tries to the votes of the rate-payers, at large, in lieu of that self-elective system which had so long and mis chievously prevailed ; nor, in spite of some disappoint ment, do we at all regret that our labours were so di rected. That disappointment, in a great measure, consists in seeing that, as the care oflhe poor has de volved upon persons many of them in a class of society much nearer their own grade, that sympathy for their wants which might have been expected to increase, has evidently diminished. This is an unaccountable and unnatural state of things, and as such a source of regret and disappointment to all who, like ourselves, had expected directly the reverse. But we must be permitted to ask, what are the gentlemen in Somerset House about, who appear to suffer to pass unnoticed such instances of inhumanity as those we allude to, though occurring within a mile of their own official place of meeting ? Those gentlemen (the New Poor Law Commissioners we mean), besides the usua channels of information which are open to the rest o: the world, have the means of knowing, inquiring into, and remedying such things, and which, as the law now stands, nobody else possesses. With the opinion which we are known to entertain towards that novel species of legislation under which those gentlemen are installed in office, we would the more sedulously guard ourselves from too readily assuming blame, where it is just possible that there may be none. But if the Poor Law Commissioners are not to blame in not having noticed and remedied the numerous outrages to huma nity to which we allude, in what state are the poor left, with the Magistrates deprived of power to assist them, and no other persons possessing it ? In addi tion to this, we must repeat what we have more than once before remarked, that if such scenes as these can occur, and remain unredressed in the metropolis, to how much greater an extent are they likely to occur in the provinces, in distant and obscure parishes, where all fear of exposure is unknown, and want and sickness are but too often, we fear, doomed to pine in hopelessness and wasting decay.—Morning Herald. The confident tone assumed by the Ministerial or gans would induce many unsuspecting persons to sup pose that the Whig Radical candidate for the vacant seat in the representation of North Northamptonshire had really some chalice to succeed in his attempt. It is complete infatuation to entertain for one moment such a belief. In addition to the assurances of the Northampton Herald as to the brilliant success of the Conservative canvass, our private information from well-informed sources--from 'parties thoroughly ac quainted with the localities where the tug of war is car ried on—leaves not a shadow of doubt on our minds as to the triumphant return of Mr. Maunsell. If the electors remain true to their promises, Mr. Hanbury must be again the rejected of the northern division of the county. The returns from the Regis tration Courts are conclusive, so far as figures and pledges are concerned, and we cannot believe that the electors will stultify and disgrace themselves by sending as Member to the House of Commons a man who will truckle to the servants of O'Connell. North Northamptonshire will follow gloriously in the wake of South Devonshire, South Hampshire, and Inverness shire. Mr. Hanbury, if he must get into Parliament, will be compelled to resort to some obscure borough left out of schedule A by the carefUl and prophetic Whigs. Lord John Russell, Lord Palmerston, and Lord Glenelg, three of his Majesty's Ministers by the grace of Mr. O'Connell, have been ignominiously ejected by large constituencies, and their nominee will share a similar fate.—Morning Post. , The letter of Sir F. Burdett to the Members of Brookes's Club, impugning the conduct of Mr. O'Connell for having employed improper language in speaking of the Duke of Wellington, the Duke of Cumberland, and other individuals of less note in the eye of society, and—generally (in court-martial phrase) for having conducted himself in a manner unbecoming a gentleman, a man of honour, and a member of Brookes's—will be found elsewhere, and will deserve a perusal on three grounds—first, its general eloquence, manly spirit, and beautiful delineation of the conduct which becomes a gentleman, both in his private and public appearances and speeches—secondly, its denun ciation of the Irish Agitator at this particular juncture of affairs, and this particular moment—and thirdly, the sort of government, or principle of government, which it would establish as a sine qua non among associations formed for political, and not merely social purposes. The design of the latter will come out as we pro ceed. With regard to the first point, we can see no - reason for the charitable shield which some of our con temporaries would throw between Sir F. Burdett and his letter. There is no mark, so far as manner and -style are concerned, of the drivelling and incapacity of age. Both are eloquent and forcible —nay, we might almost say, bold, energetic, and uncoiopromising —worthy of the best days of the writer, and not un worthy of the per. of any public man, who now figures in the political arena. What is thus forcibly expressed, , cannot have been otherwise than forcibly conceived ; and it follows in consequence, that if the matter be of a different description—if it do not bear the stamp— if it exhibit Sir Francis Burdett in a different light-- the cause must be sought for elsewhere than in the decayed, or decaying, intellectual energies of the Honourable Baronet, and may, perhaps, without any circumlocution, be traced to sympathies which have ruined other Anthonys, and other popular leaders, as well as the Representative of Westminster. That we are not wrong in this guess, however oddly it may sound in the ears of our readers, we are somewhat more than persuaded ; for what in heaven or on earth could have persuaded the " man of the people"—at least he once was—to delay until this eleventh hour, his attack, on the one hand, upon O'Connell, or, on the other, what would have been the more appropriate course, a demand upon him to know whether he had or had not been guilty of the conduct. for which he at tempts to chastise Trim ? The language of O'Connell with regard'to certain persons was notorious to every man; woman, and child in the kingdom weeks ago, as well as his journeys and 'dinners in the north of England and south of Scotland—and' yet the Hon. Baronet was silent—took the affront of a member of Brookes's having been guilty of misconduct in silence, if not in- good part, until the Raphael and the O'Connell came into collision ? Why, also, bring forward his 'charge at this particular moment,' and at this particular juncture, when, as he must be aware, the Tories are using ail their efforts to prejudice the Melbourne Administration in the estimation, not only of his Majesty, but of the country, and thereby to pave the way for their own return to power ? Is Sir Francis ignorant that such is the fact ? Does he not know that more than one Tory intrigue has already met with a deserved fate—and that another has just exploded, which had for its object the destruction of the present Reforming Administration ? If he was ignorant of these things, why did he send his letter for publication to the chief of the Tory journals, instead of to one of the liberal_ journals ? Why, finally, did he not bring the matter of dispute to the knowlege of the managers of Brookes's Club-house in an authentic shape, instead of presenting 'it to them in a manner and form which prevents . them from taking the slightest notice of it ? Ought not the stickler for de corum of manners and behaviour in others, been him self the first to show the bright example ? We men tion not these things as tending, or calculated, to de fend the language or conduct of O'Oonnell. God knows we have no great opinion of either. Few things could be more gross than the one, or more unsuited to the society of gentlemen than the other ; but, on the other hand, however similar that of Sir Francis Bur dett may have been, at one period of his life, and under similar circumstances, to that which he im pugns, we must protest against the doctrine that it is the business of a Club, be it for social or political pur poses, to take cognizance of the out-door movements of its Members in any other shape and way than the practice of society generally authorises. Grant, for an instant, that the principle were established, tha Mr. O'Connell, having misconducted himself, oug to be expelled from Brookes's or any other club-house, and would not the public immediately, and with just reason, turn round and say—why not, also, expel the fornicator and adulterer--the gambler and the black-leg--the corrupter of voters, and the sub orner of perjury ? Why condemn one man for the use of gross language, and absolve another for the habitual practice of gross acts, infinitely more mischievous to society ? We do not mean to insinu ate for a moment that such characters are to be found at Brookes's, or any other Club-house—quite the con trary—our only object being to show that if Clubs were to exert the inquisitorial out-door power advoca ted by Sir Francis, and not confine their "regiment" of their members to' their in-door conduct, no Club of any magnitude or importance could possibly exist, in a political capacity. To conclude, the great aim of Sir Francis's letter seems to be a division of the Liberal in terest, and thereby a strengthening of the Conserva tive cause—but in that be will fail, as well as in the obtainment of a seat from the Whigs in the House of Lords. The Liberals know their own game better than to open their ranks to the charge of the enemy ; and, if we are rightly informed, the electors of West minster are about to do that with the Baronet which he has shown himself so anxious to accomplish with the Irish agitator—Arcades ambo, et canere parati.— Morning Advertiser. RUSSIAN SPIES ABROAD.--A Correspondent of a Morning Paper writes as follows :—" A foreign board, making a part of the secret Police, existed at Warsaw, or ganized and directed by the Grand Duke, of which no less a person than Colonel Sass stood at the head—the same who fell a victim of his hateful profession in the late Polish revolution. He was shot. At the revision of his bureau, a list of secret emissaries abroad had been found among his papers, in which the leading members of that leading band were Baron Von Schweitzer, Pietreff, a Russian, called abroad M. Toussaint, and M. Svevois. There was no country—Germany, Italy, France, or England—without those spies. The principal cities and watering places, wherever the Poles sojourned for pleasure or instruction were infested by them. Money, with which they were abundantly provided, and letters of recommendation, paved them the way to the most expensive resorts of amusement, and even the society of the highest circles. The conduct of the young Poles was a particular object of their vigilance, and wherever they went for study abroad, a young spy was regularly sent to the same University, and immatriculated as fellow-student. They kept up a connection with the Passport -office in Poland, and were informed of all the Po lish travellers abroad. They had a carte blanche on the Russian embassies to draw personal passports for themselves, and blank passports, which they were at libery to fill up with any names they thought proper, to insure incognito to those whom they emploped, and who often were sent by them in pursuit of some unhappy victim of Constantine's persecution. This branch of the police was also connected with Post offices in the Duchy of Posen and Galicia. By some arrangement which Russia succeeded in makin g , let ters of su s p ec t e d an d p ersecu t e d persons were se n t t o War saw at its requisition. All letters coming to the country were opened." THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 1831 NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. (From the Hampshire Telegraph.) PORTSMOUTH, Nov. 21.—The Cleopatra, 28, Hon. Captain Grey, is expected at this port, from the eastward, on her way to Rio de Janeiro. The Madagascar, 46 guns, will be commissioned in a few days at this port, by Captain Bruce. The Pearl, 20, and Nimrod, 20, will most probably pro ceed in a few days to reinforce our squadron on the north coast of Spain. The Lark schooner, Lieutenant Edward Barnett, arrived from the eastward on Sunday, and sailed again with super numeraries for the Rodney at Plymouth. The Quail cutter arrived on Sunday, to complete pro visions, and sailed on Wednesday to resume her station off Brighton. The Raven yawl has this week been commissioned as a surveying vessel, and is to accompany the Etna. The Jupiter (with Lord Auckland, the Governor-Gene ral of India on board) arrived at Madeira on the 13th of October from Spithead. The London (Turner), and Tulloch Castle (Briggs), ar rived on Tuesday, from London for Jamaica ; the Mary (Beachcroft), • for Van Diemen's Land ; and the Charles Brook (Bell), for St. Vincent's, on the same day ; on Wed nesday the Apollo (Milne), and, on Thursday, the Emerald (Nelson) both from London, for Grenada. At Spithead—None. In Harbour—Britannia, Royal George, Excellent, Etna, Sulphur, Starling, and Raven. Appointments—Lieut. T. R. Sulivan, to the Speedy cutter ; Lieut. W. Blount, Mr. C. T. Doyle, mate, Mr. Alexander Paterson, Assistant-Surgeon, and Mr. H. Ma pleton, Second Master, to the Hermes ; Lieut. W. Robson, to the Phoenix ; Lieut. E. G. Fanshawe. to the Hastings ; Lieut. R. Morgan, to the Rodney ; Mr. J. Shaw, Assis tant-Surgeon, to the Lark ; Mr. J. Paul, Second Master, to the Quail ; Mr. Barnes, Assistant-Surgeon, to the Ranger ; Mr. Thomas Bellett, Assistant-Surgeon, to the Leveret ; Mr. John Coulter, Surgeon, re-appointed to the Etna, vice Mr. Mitchell Thompson (whose appointment is cancelled) ; Mr. Benjamin Heather, Purser, vice Archer, and Mr. A. W. Quilan, Master and Pilot, vice J. T. Dor mer (whose appointment is cancelled), to the Sulphur ; Lieut. Ingledue, Supernumerary of the Excellent, and Lieut. A. W. Jerningham, to be Lieutenants of the Ex cellent ; Mr. G. F. C. Bateman, Clerk's Assistant of the Quail cutter, to be Clerk of the Clio ; Mr. Charles C. Grey, Midshipman, to the Cleopatra ; Lieut. F. J. Nott, to the Etna ; Mr. C. F. A. Shadwell, mate to the Excel lent ; 4r. E. H. Weale, to be Supernumerary Assistant- Surgeon of the Britannia ; Messrs. W. H. Pike, Second Master, J. 0. Goodridge, Assistant-Surgeon, and Thomas Littleton, Clerk in Charp, to the Raven ; Mr. R. T. C. Scott, to be Assistant-Surgeon of the Etna. We intended it to be fully understood that the Admiralty Board desired, ,in an official form, that their approbation should be expressed to the Captain, Officers, and crew of the Pique, for their exertions and seamen-like conduct, in con ducting that ship across the wide Atlantic. From circum stances, however, we fear that it is not so generally under stood —we, therefore, give the letter of Admiral Sir Thomas Williams to the Hon. Captain Rous, on that occosion : " Britannia, in Portsmouth Harbour, Nov. 3. ' SHI,—On the paying off of the Pique,`the Lords Com missioners of the Admiralty are desirous of expressing their approbation of the conduct of yourself, and of the Officers and crew under your command, in extracting the Pique from the perilous situation she was in, when on shore on the coast of Labrador, and on her subsequent voyage home, under circumstances of great difficulty, and such as required skill, and exertions - of no ordinary kind ; and you will, therefore, receive and communicate their Lordships' senti ments to the Officers and crew of his Majesty's ship Pique, under your command, accordingly. I am, Sir, your humble servant, (Signed) " THOS, 'WILLIAMS, Admiral. " Captain the Hon. Henry John Rous, H.M.S. Pique." PLYMOUTH, Nov. 19.—The Rodney?, 92, Captain Hyde Parker, bent sails yesterday morning, and soon after eleven clock went out of the Sound. She will sail on Saturday, it is supposed, for Barcelona. The Waterwitch, 10, Lieut. Adams, arrived here on Thursday last, from St. Andero, whence she sailed on the 4th inst. She came into Hamoaze the next day to be docked, to have her bottom examined, having touched the ground near St. Andero. The Arab transport arrived from the Eastward on Friday, and em barked troops next day ; she sailed on Sunday for Barba does. • The Hamoaze lighter sailed on Friday for Falmouth, with stores for the ships in the Tagus. The Lark survey ing vessel arrived on Tuesday. The James Watt arrived on Tuesday, in four days from Corunna, whither she had taken 1.5,000 stand of arms and ammunition, for the service of the Queen of Spain, from London. She took in a supply of coals, and started again yesterday for London. She brings no news. In Hamoaze—Royal Adelaide, Nimrod, Pearl, Water witch, Falmouth, and Swail lighters. In the Sound—Rodney, Lark, and Diligence. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MARYLEBONE. A young woman, who gave her name Ann Johnson, was brought before Mr. HOSKINS. She was caught in the act of attempting to drown herself, and was sent, with the Ma gistrates' respects, to the officers of her parish, Hendon, re questing that she might be sent to work immediately, and the harder the work the better. The dispute between Messrs. Ayres and Cloughtman, the rival clerks at the Tottenham-court-road Chapel, again came under the notice of the Bench, the parties not having been enabled to arrive at an amicable adjustment of the question as to which should give out the hymns at the Chapel. In addition to the information against Mr. Clought man for disturbing the congregation, but in particular Mr. Ayres, the " old original clerk," on the 25th ult., there was a second charge against him for a similar offence at a sub sequent period. Messrs. Adolphus, Phillips, and Clarkson, were in atten dance, pro and con., and after the examination of a number of witnesses, the first complaint was dismissed, and in the latter Mr. Cloughtman was. held to bail for his appearance at the sessions. THAMES- OFFICE. James Wright and Thomas Field, watermen, were charged with stealing a portmanteau from on board the Columbine steamer, containing property valued at 1001., belonging to Philip Akerman, Esq., and James Sanders, a chandler's shopkeeper, was charged with receiving a portion of the stolen articles. The prisoners Field and Wright assisted in conveying the portmanteau on board the steamer, where it was seen safely deposited ; but after Mr. Akerman had arrived at Hamburgh he could not find it. Information was sent up to London, and Fogg and Evans, of this office, proceeded to make inquiries. They ascertained, on a visit to Sanders's house, in Back Church-lane, that various articles belonging to Mr. Akerman had been purchased by him. Wright was seen standing near Sanders's house, and on searching him several duplicates were found for various other articles which bad been deposited in the portmanteau. Field was afterwards taken into custody, and several witnesses proved that they were seen coming ashore at the. Custom House about an hour after the steamer had sailed, and that they both went the same night to the theatre attired in new clothing. Several pawnbrokers produced various articles of linen and other wearing apparel which had been pledged the day after the robbery. On the part of Sanders it was contended that there was no case against him ; but The Magistrates thought otherwise, and all the prisoners were committed for trial. Q UEEN- SQUARE. James Allen, alias lames Abbott, who has for some time past been proprietor of the Deptford Theatre, was on Sa turday brought before Messrs. GREGORIE and BURREL, for re-examination on a charge of embezzlement, preferred against him by Messrs. Sherwood, Prett, and Sharpe, Par liamentary agents, resident in Parliament -street. It appeared by the evidence of Mr. Sherwood that the prisoner had been in the emplopment of the firm, as princi pal clerk for some time. On the 13th of June, he gave him 'a check for 171. ss. lid. on Messrs. Drummonds, drawn by witness on behalf of the firm, to pay to the ac count of their law stationers. Shortly afterwards he ab sented himself from their employment, and information which led to his apprehension was given at the station-house of the A division. Charles Otway, police constable, 42 A, deposed to ap prehending the prisoner, on Thursday evening last, at the Deptford Theatre, of which establishment he was sole ma nager, under the name of James Abbott. The prisoner declined saying anything in his defence, but appealed to the Magistrates to remand him to a future day, in order that he might have an opportunity of employing a professional adviser on his behalf. Mr. GREGORIE said that he would have sufficient time between the present and his trial to consult with one, and he should not object to his perusing the depositions. The prisoner was then committed, and the parties bound over to prosecute. Mr. Prett stated that the firm had two other cases of embezzlement against him, both more extensive than the present, but they could not be gone into now, in conse quence of the parties not being in attendance. It was stated that the prisoner, immediately on abscond ing, had become proprietor of the theatre at Deptford, which has lately been fitted up at a great expense, and under his management with great success. He was appre hended by Otway during the performance, and was obliged to apologise to the audience for his non-appearance before them that evening. The prisoner then transferred the ma nagement to a Mr. Hughes, a party connected with the theatre, and was conveyed direct to London and lodged in safe custody. CHANCERY COURT.-SATURDAY. SHAW V. RHODES. Sir W. HORNE said there were some peculiar circum stances connected with this case which rendered it necessary for him to ask their Lordships to put it in the paper of re hearings. The whole matter had been very fully argued before Lord Brougham, and his Lordship gave judgment in it ; but unfortunately the minutes of that judgment were in such a form that they could not be shaped into any decree to which that Court could give effect. Mr. BEAMES, for the other side, admitted there was a difficulty with respect to the minutes; but he thought the Court might so construe these minutes as to render them available without putting the parties to the expense of having the whole matter re-argued. Sir C. PEPYS said that this interference of the Court with respect to the minutes of the Lord Chancellor must depend solely on the consent of both parties ; without that consent the Court could exercise no discretion in the matter. Sir W. HORNE observed that all agreement between the parties was out of the question. The question could only be settled by a re-hearing of all the points at issue. After some discussion it was at length arranged that the case should be re-heard before Sir C. Pepys and Sir J. Bo sanquet on Monday week, and not before the Vice-Chan cellor, whose judgment is appealed against. , SITTINGS OF THE COURT. It is arranged that the Lords Commissioners Pepys and Bosanquet are to sit on Monday (this day) ; the Vice- Chancellor and Sir J. Bosanquet on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday ; and the Master of the Rolls and Sir J. Bosan quet every day afterwards till the First Seal. KING'S BENCH-SATURDAY. THE KING V. JOLLY AND ANOTHER. Mr. CRESWELL called the attention of the Court to this case, of which he said he thought their Lordships' paper might now be relieved. In this case he had applied for and obtained a rule to show cause why a criminal information should not be filed against the defendants for having pub lished, in their paper called the Carlisle Journal, a libel of and concerning the Rev. Mr. Fletcher, Vicar of Dalston. The libel imputed to Mr. Fletcher that he had behaved with oppression and injustice towards a Mr. Farish, one of the parishioners of Dalston, on the subject of tithes. That libel the defendants did not justify ; but, as he understood, had instructed his Learned Friend Mr. Sergeant Talfourd to apologise for. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD said that his clients had in structed him to express their regret for having published a statement reflecting upon Mr. Fletcher's character ; that they now believed that there was no foundation whatever for the imputations which that s ement conveyed ; and they therefore begged to apologiT for having given cur rency to them. They were ready to pay the costs which had been incurred 'by Mr. Fletcher in appealing to the Court, and thus, with their Lordships' leave, to put an end to the matter. The' COURT consented to this arrangement, and the rule for the criminal information was discharged. COMMON PLEAS-SATURDAY. WEBB V. MOORE. Mr. Sergeant TALFounn moved for a conditional rule, calling on the defendant to show cause why he refused to deliver up to the plaintiff a certain agreement alleged to have been entered into between him and the plaintiff, on the latter consenting to enroll himself in the Staff band of the auxiliary corps raised in this country on behalf of Donna Isabella, Queen of Spain. A similar application had been made to Mr. Justice Park in Chamber, but his Lordship declining to make the order required, it became indispensa ble to appeal to the Court, inasmuch as the production of the document referred to was essential to the plaintiff's case. In support of the motion it was expressly sworn by the plaintiff and six other individuals, not only jointly but severally, that they repaired to the defendant's house, No. 1, Bond -street, on the sth of August last, and there signed a paper read over to them by his foreman, commencing " This agreement," and containing the conditions upon which they embarked in the service of the Spanish Government. Mr. Justice PARKE—Is there not an affidavit on the other side ? Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD replied that there was. The foreman of the defendant had made an affidavit, in which he denied that any agreement or other document was read over or signed, except a lithographed paper containing the con ditions under which the service of the auxiliary troops of her Spanish Majesty was to be regulated. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE observed that as no evidence of an agreement could be adduced at the trial of the case after the existence of such a document was so flatly denied, the application became unnecessary. It was clear that the plaintiff could not betaken by surprise. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD—But, my Lord, the defendant has called upon us for particulars of our demand. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—WeII, how can yoti give an agreement if none exist ?—Rule refused. EXCHEQUER CHAMBER. At the rising of the Courts on Saturday, the Judges proceeded to the Exchequer Chamber, to hear arguments upon reserved points on the trials of prisoners at the late assizes. THE KING V. JOHN GROVE. The prisoner in this case was tried at the Central Cri minal Court, and found guilty upon a charge of embezzle ment. An objection was then taken by his Counsel, and Mr. Mahon now appeared in support of it. From the notes of Mr. Justice Williams (who presided at the trial), the prisoner, it appeared, was cashier at the house of Master man and Co., bankers ; that it was his duty to take the money paid at the counter, and each night to insert in his book the amount received during the day. Upon the 29th of August there appeared in his handwriting the usual entry of moneys received, amounting to 1,7621. In con sequence of some suspicion having rested upon the prisoner, he was next morning called to pay in that sum, when he could only render an account of 1,309/. That he admitted to a person named Oxley that he was deficient 9001., which he stated he had lost in a speculation with a Mr. Gibbs, and besought forgiveness. The prisoner was indicted upon two counts, one charging him with embezzlement, the other with larceny : the latter the Jury negatived, but found him guilty of the former. Mr. Mahon contended that the evidence in the case was not sufficient to warrant a conviction, and objected to the finding upon three grounds :—First, no particular person had proved that the sum which was alleged to have been embezzled was received. Secondly, it was not embezzled, even if the crime had been committed ; and thirdly, the time when such embezzlement took place was not specified. There was no statement how or when this deficiency origina ted, nor was it proved that a specific sum had been received, from whence it might be shown that this had been taken. It was doubtless accruing from year to ye ar , as th e p r i soner was not called on to rendr his accounts at any stated time. It might have. been lost by the many errors incidental to the keeping of books ; in truth, it was but a mere statement of accounts and moneys, which latter might never have existed, and if the principle ex nihilo nihil fit at all avails the prisoner could not be said to have taken that which was not in existence. Then, as to the admission, it was vague and indeterminate, and such as ought no t to be hld sufficient for conviction where it had not been shown that some moneys were received by the prisoner which he subsequently could not account for. If he could have been found guilty at all, it must have been of larceny; the money he received at the counter he deposited in the till, which, being his master's, he could not be said to have embezzled the sum charged, but to have abstracted it. Had the money so received at the counter in transitu been taken by the prisoner, it was unquestionably embezzlement, but under the circumstances, if taken at all, the Jury could have only found him guilty of the larceny ; upon this he had already been acquitted : and as legal guilt could only be established by legal evidence, that which would go to prove one thing and proves another, differing from it, would be er roneous. Under these circumstances he claimed the of the objection for his client. Mr. LEAHY, for the prosocution, argued that the convic tion was a legal one, and perfectly within the provisions of the 7th and Bth of Geo. IV., under which the prisoner was indicted. By the 47th section those requisites which his Learned Friend, Mr. Mahon, deemed essential to obtain a legal conviction, were not set down. It would have been different, he admitted, by the 30th Geo. 111., but that was repealed by the statute to which he alluded. Mr. MAHON shortly replied, and the Judges retired. Judgment postponed. ARDENT PROOF OF AFFECTION.—On the even ing of Monday last a house was discovered on fire in the street of Baldoyle, and had it not been seen in time, and effectual means taken to prevent the flames from communicat ing with the adjoining cabins, all of which were thatched, the entire range in the street might have been destroyed. Upon investigating its cause, it was ascertained that it had been committed by a young man named Edward M'Cabe, who had been for some time paying his addresses to a fair lady, residing in the place, and whose disinclination to en joy " Love in a Cottage," with him, had so stirred up his jealous anger, that he would have sacrificed her house, and all that it did contain, to tine disappointment of his wounded feelings. He has been taken into custody, and will most probably be sent to stand his trial at the next Kilmainham sessions, for his rashness.—Freeman. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. HUNTING APPOINTMENTS. th . The King's Stag Hounds meet on Tuesday at Ascot Ilea ' Friday, at Slough. The Burton Harriers/on Wednesday at Beaminster Down. Mr. Mure's Hounds on Tuesday at Ixworth Abbey ; Thursday' l Branches Park—half-past 10. The Royston Harriers on Tuesday at Whittlesford ; Th'i rsda " ' at Reed Hills—at 11. Mr. B. Fretwell's Hounds on Tuesday at Beckford Hall, to 11: i r , the birthday of T. Wakeman, Esq., f a th er o f the turf arko ' e „,, fi being in the 98th year of his age ; Thursday, at Winckeomb ; a'"" day, at Hawling Gate—at 11. The Somerset Subscription Fox Hounds on Tuesday at Bag rough Plantation ; Friday at Buncombe Hill—at half-past 10. " red , The Brighton Harriers meet every Monday at Patcharn ; nesdays, at the Race Course; Fridays, at the Dyke. talc; The Thanet Harriers meet on M o nd a y a t M on kt on Sea io. Wednesday, at Minster Mills ; F r id a y, a t N as h C our t Hill- 3 ;V, A , The Brookside Harriers on Mondays at Newmarket Hill; 71, nesdays, at Lewes Race Course ; Fridays, at Telscombe Tye past 10. Mr. Farquharson's Hounds on Tuesday at Holnest House ; d a y, nesday, at Buckland Wood ; Friday, at Melcomb Park ; See r at Clifton Wood. 12. The Essex Stag Hounds on Wednesday at Whappl e 's Mill Mr. C. Brock's Hounds on Monday at Upton Snodsbury; nesday, at Bishop's 'Wood—half past 10. Mr. Browne's Hounds on Tuesday at Acton Green ; FriclaP Bishop's Frome Village—at 9. The South Wold Hounds on Tuesday at Tower-on-the- 10r; Friday, at Burwell Village—at 11. Mr. Leche's Hounds on Tuesday at Handley ; Friday, at Gr es ' ford—half-past 10. tb e Sir R. Hill's Hounds on Tuesday at Sundore ; Th ur sday, at Kennel ; Saturday, at Petton—half-past 10. The Albrighton Hounds on Tuesday at Cosford ; Thursday, Worfield ; Saturday, at Hilton—half-past 10. The Herefordshire Hounds on Tuesday at Berrington; Friday' Pool Cottage—at 10. Mr. Vyner's Hounds on Friday at Hockley House ; Wedne 9(l3 ‘ at Thickthorn ; Friday, at Hampton-in-Arden—kialf-past 10. The Essex and Suffolk Hounds on Tue s d a y a t Tattings s o " . White House ; Friday, at the Park Lodge Hou se , Mistley—at 1 a t The Norfolk Fox Hounds on Tuesday, at W ee ti ng ; Thursda);''. Marham (Mr. Winearl's) ; Saturday, at Lang ur :B r id g e ; 31onelY: the 30th, at Pudding Norton ; Wednesday, Dec. 2, a t Hought e ,`i Inn ; Friday, the 4th, at Litcham Common ; Tuesday, the St ll4 „, Beeston by Sherringham ; Thursday, the 10th, at M e lton ~ stable ; Saturday, the 12th, at Elnaham Hall—half-past 10. The Knapton Harriers on Tuesday, at East Ruston Chile' Friday, at Southrepps—at 11. Sir C. Constable's Stag Hounds on Friday at Lelley Village" at 11. The Badsworth Fox Hounds on Tuesday at Red House ; Thc day, at Ackworth Park; Saturday, at Wormsley Mr. Hall's Hounds on Tuesday at Dillington House; at Hatch ; Saturday, at Norton Clouse—half-past 10. The Langport Harriers on Friday at Pathe Bridge ; Monday , till 30th, at Somerton Hill ; Friday, Dec. 4, at Lite'u Cary—at 1 0 . The Burton Vale Hounds on Friday at Marsh Coppice. The Devizes Harriers on Saturday at Candon--at 11. Mr. A. Smythe's Hounds on Tuesdayat South Grove—.at 1 1 ' jr Mr. W. Horlock's—Hounds on Friday at the G eorge I n n, Ss° Lane—half-past 10. Lord Petre's Hounds on Thursday, at Woodham ; Saturday , ° Mountnessino• Hall—half-past 10. 0. The Cambridgeshire Hounds on Friday at Childerley Gate-- 1 It The Puckeridge (Mr. Dalyell's) Fox Hounds on Wednesday Scales ; Saturday, at Sandon Green-10. Sir R. Sutton's Hounds on Wednesday at Midge Inn; Thursin at the 9th mile-stone, Newark-road—at 11; S a t ur d a y, a t PIO Gate—at 10. Lord Yarborough's Hounds on Wednesday at Wroby Mill; Vi dal ' at Elkington ?,ow Pasture; Saturday, at Chase Hill—at 11. ~e The Tiverton Hounds on Thursday a t G og l an d near Witheri"s Moor—half-past 10. x, Mr. Meynell's Hounds on Thursday at Ed nas t on L o d e; Sa tur dab , at Henhurst—at half-past 10. Stan The Marquis of Hastings' Hounds on Wed nes d ay , a t S Park ; Saturday, at Cavendish Bridge—half -past 10. The Easton Hounds on Thursday at Kyrewood--at 10. The Cottesmore Hounds on Tuesday at Barleytb.orpe ; Thursday at Hollywell—quarter befOre 11. Mr. S. Owen's Hounds on Friday at Aston Gate—half -13. 10 ' t Mr. Wicksted's Hounds on Thursday at Trentha.m ; Saturday, 5 Willowbridge—half-past 10. The East Kent Fox Hounds on Wednesday at Trenby Park ; day, at Elham Park. The Tickham Hounds on Thursday at Norton Court—half-P. 10, rm.._ The F. B. Hounds on Thursday at Roskeymer 'Wood—at The Cheshire Hounds on Wednesday, at Brereton Green LSt,„'''', f• day, at Oulton Park ; Tuesday, at F our L ane E n d s, near Tarr-: ley; Wednesday, at the Black Dog; Friday, at Norton; SaturriaP at Appleton Hall—half-past 10. Col' The Oakley Hunt (Mr. Dansey' s H oun d s ) on Th urs d ay , at C worth ' • Saturday, at Lidlington Kenn e l— quar t er t o 11. Mr. Muster's Hounds on Wednesday at the seven mile stone, - le; ton-road ; Friday, at Halloughton town—half-paz ,t JO. The Rufford Hounds on Thursday:at Rufford Keanels ; SaturdaY• at Winkbourn—half-past 10. Mr. Errington's Hounds on Thursd a y a t Gureley ; Friday, a; Widmerpool—quarter to 11. 11 Mr. Richard Bagge's Harriers on Wed nes d a y at M r . Rocks e % , Chosely ; Thursday, at Thornham Hall ; F r id a y, a t Mr. Marste rs Lugden Hill—at 11. Sir J. Flower's Harriers on Thursday at M r . Heart's; Breeeles : Monday, Nov. 30, at Winfarthing Pound—at 11. Mr. H. Villebois's Harriers on Wednesday at Bil ney ; Friday, sti the Swan, Methwold—at 11. The Wa:v,ickshire Hounds on Thursday at Durichureh; Sate ° day, at Haiford Bridge—quarter to 11. The Atherstone Hounds on Thursday at Normant on Lodge Gat e ; Saturday, at Combe—quarter to 11. The Sandbeck Fox Hounds on Wednesday at the Kennels; Friday,. at Renishaw—half-past 10. Mr. Foljambe's Fox Hounds on Wednesday at Darlton ; Fria* at Gringley—half-past 10. The Heythrop Hounds on Thursday at Tar Wood ; Friday, ' 4 Gawcomb—half-past 10. Mr. Drake's Hounds on Thursday at Waterperrli Wood; Sato!' day, at Wyfield Toll Bar—half-past 10. The Berkshire Hounds on Wednesday at Coombe! Wood; Friday' at Sandford Kennel—half-past 10. The Wynnstay Hounds on Wednesday at Overton Bridge; Sa - turday, at Knolton—at 11 The Hon. Mr. Moreton's Hounds on Wednesday at Alveg ° , Village.; Thursday, at Cricklade ; S a t ur d ay a t F a i le f or d—hf.-p. l O Mr. Payne's Hounds on Wednesday at Arthingvvorth ; Friday, a t Misterton ; Saturday, at Great Hanowden—half-past 10. The Duke of Grafton's Hounds on W e d nes d a y a t S to k es Plain , Friday, at Whittle Wood—half-past 10. SUICIDE.—An industrious old woman, in the pa• rish of Libberton, Glasgow, had been engaged through the harvest working for the neighbouring farmers- Last week' finding no more work to be got, she ended her d a ys by 3 rope. She was known to have had .a strong impression 1. 1 0 11 her mind of fear of want, though it was discovered, that by sides a few pounds of cash in the house, she had a consider' able sum out on interest. (ADVERTISEMENT.) POWERFUL MUSICAL BOXES, in WOO cases, 12 inches long, by 5 inches wide, each playing Four Al'; with the music finished in a very superior manner,. are offered .° Five Guineas each. Also a few of the same d esc ripti on , with SAS Airs, price Seven Guineas each, at T. Cox SAvt) ay's, Workia Silversmith, Goldsmith, and Watchmaker, 47, Corrihill, London, N. B. The small musical boxes, 3i inches long, continue sellinr in tin cases, price 19s. each, or in composition shell cases, at YR' each. 13 IRTIIS. On the 20th inst., Mrs. Tegart, of Pall-mall, of a daughter. On the 20th inst., in Upper Harley-street, the b.dy of Charl o James Bevan, Esq., of a daughter. On the 19th inst., at Shacklewell, Mrs. Harrison, of a son. On the 20th inst., at Holloway, the lady of hir. Thorna 9 Kemp, of a son. On the 20th inst., Mrs. Alexander Graham, New Bridge-stree t/ of a daughter. On the 14th ult., at Southery, Norfolk, the lady of thy Ee l ' James Kirkpatrick, of a daughter. —.O MARRIED. On the 19th inst., at St. Giles's, Reading, Rupert Clarke, Egq;: of the above place, to Susan, eldest d aug ht er o f t h e l ate D . ver Esq., Homerton, Middlesex, and niece of Robert Lloyd, Esq . ' Albion-place, Reading. On the 18th inst., by his father, the Rev. James - Roe, rector of Newbury, Thomas Roe, Esq., Major in the Hon. East India C Ol 5 pany's service, to Lucy, daughter of the late Willi am R oe, E s q., Liverpool. On the 17th inst., at Aclam, the Rev. T. Watkins Richard " ,1 fourth son of the late Right H on . th e L or d Chi e f B aro n, ' Everald Cathena, only surviving daughter of the late Wit Hustler, and sister of th e p resen t Thomas Hustler, E;:q., of Acito 4 " Hall, Yorkshire. DIED. On the 18th inst., Captain Sir John E. G. Parker, Royal A", tillery, in his 47th year. On the 19th inst., in Conduit-street, Sarah Maria relict of th e Rev. Charles Booth, l a t e o f T wem l ow H a ll, Cheshire, aged 89. On the 18th and 19th inst., at Ham, Charles, in the sth yeas Urquhart, in the third year, and Lushington, in the second year ° their ages —sons of Gordon Forbes, Esq. On the 19th inst., at Exeter, Mrs. Roliston, eldest daughter of the late William Nurse, Esq., of Pinner, Middles...x. On the 14th inst., at Wood's Hotel, Furnival's Inn, the Ro r ' John Harvey, rector of Finningley, Nottinghamshire, aged 70. On the 17th inst., of apoplexy, Lieutenant-Colonel James T 00,.: of Cumberland -t errace , R egen t' s - par k, o f t h e H on. East Ina' Company's service. On the 15th inst., in his 39th year, William, third son of th e late Mr. John Holgate, of Manchester. On the 12th inst., at Ryde, Isle of Wight, David Stark, Esq•' late of the Ceylon Civil Service, aged 48. On the 15th inst., in Bawtry, the Dowager Viscauntess GalwaY , in her 81st year. On the 16th inst., in Sherrard••street, Piccadilly, James Smith; Esq., Deputy Storekeeper of his Majesty's Ordnance at the Island of St. Vincent. At Barrack-street, Taunton, Thomas Phippen, aged 104. Th e old man u s ed t o say , th a t h e attr ib ute d t h e preservation of his healt;', in some degree to his never having taken any " doctoring sta. He drove the first post chaise introduced to that town at the Sue r Loaf Inn. Lately, at the house of Mrs. Preston, of Barnwell, Cambridge shire, Mrs. Merry, aged 86. At Leeds, aged 86, Henry Cusson, formerly a banker at Thirsk• On the 15th inst., at Belvoir Castle, in his 54th year, Major- Goneral Lord Robert William Manners, C. 8., and M.P. for North Leicestershire. Lord Robert's death is a blow that comes unmiti gated by the warning of previous ill ness . H e was i n t h e fi e ld with Lord Forester's hounds on Thursday, and pursued a hard day 5 .hooting on - Friday, apparently in his usual health. On SaturdAY morning when his servant entered his bed-room, he found his Lord' ship labouring under evident and alarming indisposition. On the 18th inst., aged 91, Elizabeth, relict of the late John Hare, and mother of the late Rev. Edward Hare, Wesleyan Minis ter ; she was nearly 70 years a member of the Baptist Church's meeting in Saithouse-lane. On the Ilth inst., in his 64th year, the Rev. Thomas Young, M.A., rector of Gilling, Yorkshire, and formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cam',ridge. London : Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG, of No• 113, Strand, at The Sun Office, No, 112, Strand, in the count"' of Middlesex. TO THE GEN THE of v has render-o as Electors. '3 d by m i 73r anythint ' u m clear tc grclt indeed i 0 Under e mngenial tc offerinf, * great came gelled me, I you. My politi constant air f avourable I attachment *nee ; an d s titution a , sc givl: my ' aid In accor& 'support to tl tY's present principle, di Your enlight 'My own Atrriculture. 'no class of tl the cgonri Aculi clut for this Divi tent of my i„,.lTing Inc a his, togeth Place of you tamely to h to which I a I shall do carliea poss: 'l .eltnarsh, T Hanl Lollse, Cock p. E N ALTE The Pen v() OL, of REPRURT a nd from Fa FC Returning. ..... . The Rate 'With Wines, on board, ui Which will 1 From o From a From a From c W. and 4 FIVI size, eonstri abov e line z. A WEEK V essels vvill t he Varda of Young, viz. ! ) teain- s hip 20 horse These wit} t hemeantin 'SIGHT as \TOTI of at of his prest tinder the n Carriages, ; otherDutie laws relatin /til l put up hire, a t thc the Eleveni ' l ,^ o ll, subje4 ' 0 Farm, fi bext, inclus is to —2' c. • o. 1 . North 2. North! Cun Yorksl upot 4• Lamas Staf Tan 5 • Lincol witt shin Nortiv 7. -woihrelre the shir 8. Norio' brit' 9• Redfoi shir 10 . Surre' 11. Middi the 12. Kent, Sus 13 • Ham 14 • COrniv) tisa.AuNtirdeo t dr l n i tto e i teiiei i: 1 6. S out h The P ei Per C en t. Th e F, onree or t the Stamps i ' L e Paym t All Pei notify thei at th e S ta pre v i ous t i th e i r Nam Dist r i ct of r use, EA IR COT and light: Possibly bi tentees,