The Sun. — London, England, 1835-12-07 00:00:00

F` : -- , • ,• _ e LJ N -- se f : e ; 0 1 1 i .e ' ,.. 5 1i , ii ) ., , , , ,.. t i ii L ~ ,i , : :a s:. : :n i .rt i si 7 THE 4LO DON MONDAY DFCEMBFR '7 1835. , ,-- , , _4 . . .- .• - ---- _ -,,---, .......-,,—_ . ~,-,,.....„......,... . __ matter. Plaintiff had no interest what- lie had tried to break open the door of•one of the rooms, THE SILVER CRADLE -0031 - 11, IT.T.iii .......------- ---- SPIRIT OF THE PUBLIC a. . .1 0 UltNe'llaS. Poland be once moaae raised age:lost him, which cx- tithe.; ie Ireland under their existing nit rage and i i . 5 be, lost in the attempts to en- Ninsierous lives have a and m had been abused in it. theto plunder more effectually. : .... -© I ) * ''" "‘ • ' ‘ force them, but to Mr. Ulan-Yin recalled—Proved ss, 5 - the printing of the Alfred The LORD MAYOR— •_ . . 1 - - kin - - what nothr. g else could explain, Our observations, on Saturaay 'N (*A ,on elic sub- bloodthirsty spirit of Ilene-sauce the natural effeet (e no e4et. A reform in the system Wh y. did she make you go to the On Saturday the Committee appointed to inquire into • extreme terror which seems to have dictated every ex -canalone present 1 i e the tsetablisoment ; but the Church 1 ' house so early as four o'c,oek in the morning ? The Boy— the most appropriate and complimentary mode of expressing undermine the present - jest of the Tory intrigues to - I Cross-examinsd-Plaintiffacted .. e e •of the Muscovite. The Journal de Frank- faction would rather bazard civil war than yield a par- - felt by- the Corporation at the birth of 3 Government, and bring about another coup a'etat, pression . tide kindness for the family of witness, after the death of wit- The the Court of Russia, taken in con- of its usurped possessions to the demands of jus- H ess's female prisoner said that the boy told his master she son of the Chief Maeistrate duringthe M met id e vl . Art, an organ of .,. ~ father. An application had been made by Noyes was innocent of all she had beenchargedwith. The boy Guildhall have brought upon us much correspondence and , , .Wric Lice andsound ~ • • w are nexion with the speech, never once attempts to s.. - - particularly anxious to prove • • • that plaintiff was the editor of the Satirist. Wit- made out the story to excuse himself • and as for the. plates: Deputy V' ;D. WIRE, Esq., in the Chair. . • . , , rictus communications. These generally coofirm our e-r-ation of having violated the treaty of Vienna, to caution th e p u bli c ag . a h ist t ii, attempts w hi c h . are ness was asked whether he wanted the situation of reader. and other things aes, .e, tine tha and information respec e ~.. the . she was accused of having stolen, the dermen should in their. scarlet robes, and the Commol 1 eists for fleiss , a had better behio• made to im ose on its credulity. We erceive Witnes .• 1 '. preaiouS impressions a f ._ 1 so that future political apo,o, . . a _ a , y -. . s said that could not be . proved, for it was not true. daughter of the old woman had taken awav, promising to Council in their violet e•Owns present' Address to rl ic o the genera stir•, an tiatrenic activity of the enemy an„ 'hop that sort of special pleading.. The Frankfort that several meetings are about to be called for similar Mr. Hantsmen, a person in the house of Messrs, Long- bring' them back. , Lord- Mayor, coaeratulatirie his Lordship on the hal)1 ) , 1 •ve - amonost the Cossacks and Sutlers of the Conservati article insists on the fact, that the " Poles have at all purposes to those which we have noticed, and to what- man, the publishers of " The Literary Souvenir,". proved • The LORD MAYOR cominitted the - boy for stealing the event' ; and also present' a r ' • - of b' e .ss same time, happy to . 'ent the sym iath m , vil it vur of the that Mr. Watts the editor of that work :he said that silver out ' piece of plate considera , camp, although we are,. at the , i I ; ei i i _ times shown themselves averse to any Government, no ever ex, ~ . 1 y ay pre a Ifa o • it had been deer • in decreasing sale while he d .. . .was c . onnecte plates, &c. oi. the drawer, and the girl foe stealing the value to his Lerdship as a further testimony of their rat, reel a ssured that the mines laid . with so mu ch i. what, which placed them under a foreign Irish Clergy, let it not blind the people of England to w,ittheficatiom at Court have exploded without, the matter nu ; late period of the publication injured it. There . sceptre." What is this but an aggravation of the the machinations by which the common enemy is en- 211.ARY LEB ONE: It was stated that the records had been searched;foril lo Bence and shill 1 were opportunities of shipping which were lost through the courtiers nor courtezans have ... ._ _ . . another argument deavourina to mar the progress of Government i A young man, about 22 years of age, of very stylish ex- slapose of ascertaining whether it was the practice upo n slightest effect. Ne e itoer it would be cruelty charged againstßussia, and a goodate period of publication. • •kind c succeeded in making out their case, that i _. .n favour of the wisdom of those restraints imposed in both countries. The whole affair is a Tory trick Cross-examined—Witness knew that for some years past • terior, was charged with stealing five sovereigns and some occasions• of the to get ready a silver cradle. for tli lis- ' trinkets from Mrs. Mary Spicer, atleast double his age. • ' reception of the child ; but the Town Clerk informed tit lient or wise, or safe, to run the nisi{ of a t u-on her by the neaotiators of Vienna, who knew, to cast odium on the' Melbourne Administration, for the plaintiff had been attacked in " Fraser's Maeazine." • ex pee , ification of v e , The lady whose evidence was re eatedl • broken bI, Committee that he was not aware of en • resolution for lutiou, and a second re-action, for the grat . acknowledged, and thus far respected, the patrio- attempting to do that which justice, sound policy, and A youth named Williamson, from the establishment of • ' p 3 y her ~., , babe . . • a soplacing a mayoreety in,silver. sighs and sobs, stated that she was possessed of some or for the sole promotion , of their ex- Mr. Hulmandel roved th• ttl t •• tl •'. t• ? 1 I es. iit tic spirit of the Poles, and their inherent love of hoer y. i Lei • .y, as well as the voice of the public, called ,• . ~ p ala b en ernan had engrayed their revenge,littl , .t • 1 • CI - 1 s, proper y, an( resided in ler es-street., 1 m tman s , . . Alderman T. WODD lind 110 t tl l• II • • • t ° le s ig test objection ell NN , e are safe from , • elusive interests. So far, so w .els for the monstrous notion promulgated by the Holy upon them to do. It is •the last trick which they have the ,l, rint of Mr. r I W i Watts which was published ia Fraser s market. In an evil hour sbe became ac ueinted with the go the whole length of the vote of congratulation, and 0 b t eche oyes . had nothing to do with it. Wit daircer. Still the calm may c re, ii - Alliance, at the instance no doubt of Russia, that the any chalice of.winning. People of England ►! it is for 1 immediate Hess delivered . eirisoner, who represented himself as acquainted clerk to a. present that vote in his Aldermatlic robes ;but he real' l 1 the look-out for squa s,the copies to Eraser. One thousand four ' f rous, and we must be on . y v partitioning Poland would prove the best recipe for your good sense to determine whether they shall have .hundred prints' were delivered. merchant, of Camomile-street, in the city, and she had no could not see why an occurrence which would in the cameo roaching session. - e ' • the centre of it or rot—whether Reformhalt on the thresh-reason to call in question the truth of his story, as he al- almost guy during every hour of the appdestroying a focus of confusion in . . . . shall Cross-examined—As far as witness knew, 'Moves had ' ; - ance of the Reform - Association ton as not at allrei i es E It us as k, has the event confirmed any such hold, or enter the dwelling of corruption, ant. saeep n o thi a a t 1 ways conducted himself in the most. gentlemanly manner. upon extraordinary, should be marked by rely upon the a LI e Europe, e , , o( o with the printing of the letterpress. for action on ni• I Their acquaintance soon ripened into love, and sheexpensive testimonial. He was sure that id a greater nag keep their machinery in order, and read t anticipation ? Has Poland ever been tranquiizec, out o f it the unclean things which have fattened so Sir F. PoLLocic replied with great force upon the eve- passed v‘oola bliss with theprisoner hours of heartfelt - impose be *(.l tothe feelings than to him pal_ . o . f the Lord Mayo . r the.shorteet summons. Reformers of all classea mast by ti le crue lties practised against her ? Has the peace long on your miseries, wrongs, and sufferings.—Morn deuce, and commented severely on the a ttempt t o ma k e ou t many - _ recollect that the eyes of the country are upon them. „ , ot Europe been promoted f)y this horrible invasion of ing Advertiser. the evidence this clay of the plaintiff's connection with the den e, as a lover. At length they were asked in church, andthe , Satirist, when the defendant Moses knew most perfectly and Tuesday last was fixed for the day on which they were compliment, by offering him a piece of plate in commemor There must be the same cordial co-operation, the most sacred rights ? Has injustice or oppression s to be united. On the Wednesday preceding the day time of the birth of a.sixth or seventh child, particularly 1 1 same disinterested sacrifice of individual views and opi- ever proved a peacemaker? God forbid it should I CHANCERY that no such connection existed. There was no COUIIT.—SATURDAY. - - • evadence he was likel •to heve a f am il ynamed, theprisoner visited her as usual, and stayed with . Y , of considerably greater , er of the 'Govern- whatever to support the defence of provocation, and the• 'lions, to a genera , . and hearty support . . will hate Then for the ingratitude of Poland to Alexander—the - • . Jury ought to mark their reprobation (4 the system of per- tent.—(A laugh.) her till the evening, when he took his departure. Soon . . ment, which we have no doubt the Ministers ingratitude lof a captive towards his gaoler I How is IN RE THE BARONESS xinKwALL. sonal attack which had been adopted against the plaintiff. • afterwards she missed a small box from her apartments, Mr. ALDERMAN (Deputy of Cripplegate Ward), 315° a right to claitn from the undivided popular party, by the charge made good ? Alexander, forsooth, in 1820, The LORDS COMMISSIONERS heard Counsel in their L • Iler , • e objected to the proposal of the plate. ' containin g. five sovereigns and some jewe 3, which non ..,... . .ord DENMAN summed up, and told the Jury to con -of their measures of relief. private room upon a petition in this matter. but tne prisoner could have taken ; and she subsequently Deputy PEACOCK said the town had got hold of the terse • an early announceineet made a speech to the Polish Diet ; for under the treaty seder whether the publication of November, 1834, was a , mature at- EVANS V. HAZALDINE. discovered that the prisoner, who knew from her where silver cradle, but he believed that there existed n o prec°' Nothing would seem more unwise than pre • of Vienna Poland had a Parliament ; but the Autocratlibel on the plaintiff, or a criticism on his works - or wile constitution of the tempts to interfere with the present . _ " the happy accident "—eeproached the Parliament Upon this petition comineon to be argued, which related titer the - me publication of June, 183 a, was or was not a libel ' her money was placed, had attempted to obtain 10/. in her dent for any vote of the kind. At all events, if there eve r to the appointment of a receiver of certainpropertybe-name' from her banker Mr -Shrubs • 1 of o e . , . Kingston. On existed any authority for supplying an expensive article j° House of Peers, on the part of Members not possessing of Poland with sedition—too common in our dad longing . on the plaintiff's person and character. if they found both • lunatic,l defendant' • to a wlo was in the suit, and or either f tlt b rb it 1 o iese publication s o e lei ous t ley would - • • 1 • •the * • ' meeting him in .street she taxed him with the robbery, commemoration of an event of very oommon, and to map • sufficient influence to insure a majority on any motion —and for what ? Because, in the exercise of its in- to the payment of • C money into Court, an objection was and gave him in charge to a constable. She had inquired very disagreeable, occurrence, the march sof intellect bP abandon theirthen declare the amount of damages to which the thou ht - y for that pnrpose. The Peers must either herent and undoubted rights, that national assembly taken that the petition was informal, inasmuch as it wasthe plaintiff entitled. g in Camomile-street, and found that no such person as the surely raised up such a dust as completely obscured its pre' • -- opposition to the principles of measures .sent up to tad rejected some of the bills proposed by his Minis- not entitled in the lunacy as well es in the cause, and thatprisoner lived there ; and, in fact, she was sure be Was no- sent application.—(A laugh.) The Jury, after half an hour's consultation,. returned a them by the Representatives of the People, or they , tern, and were 'thus accused of sedition for having the part of it which related to the appointment of a re- verdict for the defendants on the first count, and for the thing but an imposter, whose object in making love was to It was then agreed that the congratulation should n otirr must be rtfornicd. Heap cinders on their heads . acted on laws which Alexander, in words, had ceiver could only be granted upon a petition addressed to plaintiff on the second. Damages, 150 L 'plunder her of her property. In answer to a question the elude the piece of plate or silver cradle, but should 10 the Great Seal in the matter of the lunacy, complainant stated that on the day she lost her propertyverbal compliment, merely a . drawn up in the most select al' Dispatch the Bills in the House of Comthaa , . 5. Use ' acknowledged d • . ever with the best these a ;an SOJS it Sir L. SHADWELL directed the t• t• to be pe i . ion amended the prisoner appeared very fidgety and uneasy all day. She appropriate language. no threa•enine• language to be taken advantage or barbarians---there is no reliance to be placed upon any b ~. . men and artists. Among those we noticed -Mr. Lockhart, • " b •---, . y entitling it in the cause, as well as in the lunacy, and Mr. Crofton Croker, Mr. Panizzi, Mr. Wilkie, • 1 Mr. never saw-him so much so before. an Prisoner—And by the Lords as an apology to the country for then' nromisc they make, or one syllable they utter. For that another petition should be presented in time matter of Goodyear. no wonder, after the sweet kisses you THE MARKETS. conduct, and leave their Lordships to reconaile to their • ten ;'ears, during" the remaining reign of Alexander, the lunacy only. bestowed on me, and now you turn round and bring this fellow-subjects, as best they may, a continued hostility the Poles endured a constant succession of encroach- EXCHEQUER COURT—SATURDAY. charge, which bas no foundation in truth. • • tiOUNTRY CORN MARKETS DURING LA rEEg. . ST li --- , . ___ to the progress of .improvernent, and to the Dings ments ard tyrennies upon their acknowledged rights. . e. , ROLLS COURT. _..,__......---. . The complainant blushed, but made no reply. Wheat. Barley. Oats. - -------- 1 '.leani. Ve3s , The prisoner was remanded. _ G o vernment—that Government having the support of They buoyed themselves up with the hope that in ' ---,ea-- IMPORTANT TO THE TRADING CLASSES OF THE Per Quarter, s. to s. s. to s. s. to s ----- to ,• the House of Commons and of the people. If this some gleam of intellectual and political sunshine that TREZEVANT V. FRAZER. . METROPOLIS. . ' ' MARLBOROUGH-STREET. ()ROUGH- STREET. Catlisle----... 40 -28- 21 •4As" 4i Ilexham...-........., - ;.: 33 40 25 26 16. - 22 - -.....-- ' -,- 4 course be followed with temper and patience, we yen- Prince would return to the professions which lie had This case came before the - Court nearly a fortnight ago, Mr. Leslie, the foreman of the Jury, stated to the Lord Dennis Holland, a porter, was brought before Mr. DYER 111.irpetli-.......-....... 28 25 23 25 15 o u 32 - '- 30 P mrith —......- 42 - tune to predict an utter failure of the hopes' and ex abandoned—that he would rule ahem, not like serfs, and the arguments which, from time to time had been de- Chief Baron that be wished to make a representation to and Mr. CONANT for final examination, charged with having setileie -41-gd•" ' 21 - ' 3 , 1 ; 5 pectations of the Tories, and a peaceful and speedy but citizens—and, moreover, that he would fulfil ferred, were only concluded to-day. The case came before the Court on the subject of summoning Juries. He stated robbed his masters,' Messrs. Ridgway, booksellers, Picea- Winchester ....-.. !3241 , 27 34, I 2; g - 4 , 11 --_. -, the Court on two sets of exceptions to the Master's report, that be_had e named_the matter to Mr. Baron Bolland on tli dilly, of books to a large amount ; and Mr. Peter Mudie ca l r ' n e i r ar il ti ir e t n lei. s 4 l sti o : 1 . , d 6 , . 41 .„, i . , 0. „ 0. .. 0. , 0 , s: 0 accomplishment of the objects of all rational Re the assurances repeatedly given of re-uniting the whole 29142000 00 00 :' 0 taken by the plaintiffs, .Fr. and Mrs. Tresevant, and by 3 .. ,d 91 .k •ariber, but was not aware whether that Learned and Christopher Mudie, sscond-hand booksellers, in Prin- i 3eierie e e..- . ....-- o o t! o 3 C . formers, even with regard to the unreformed institution of Poland, as • she existed before the first partition,o 0; 2 9 O5 6 000 0 . l o a the defendant, Mr. Frazer. Both sets, though they dif- Judge had had an opportunity to mention it to the Court. ces-street, and Mr. Jolly, second-hand bookseller, of War- . N ewcastle '' Stall • ) 6 ' 0 ti 93 6 40 3 0 3 4 5 0 53 0 0 1,; 0 of hereditary , legislators, without qualification either of to the territory of the modern duchy, which act, by feted in point of form, were the same in substance. The Lord. ABINGER—I have not heard of it ; perhaps it is a dour-street, were also charged with having received , ' I . l o o r n t e liallerton ....... ,tg 7 ; , a t g 4 6 3 3 4 0 5 a n i 00 - a s o brains or estate. Our correspondents send us amusing combining tog 12,000,000 of Poles, would have facts, as they appeared from the statement of Counsel, w ere. matter that should be mentioned to some Member of Par- of the property, knowing it t o h ave b een stolen.ea part L 48 30 34 00 0l • 0 0 ‘ ," O ansea-=.— .5 6 5 9 2 9 3 0 2 6 3 9 00 , 0 0 0 0 ill . Warwick ,80903046"03 • 3 5 6 6 1, . 0 0 • descriptions of the means and devices by which been itself the guarantee for a system of government as follow :—The question which the Court had to d ec ide liament. ' Mr. Phillips attended for the prosecution ; and Mr. ' Per 8011. • i - the Carlton Club faction have been paving the way compatible with their freedom, and productive of their was whether certain transactions between the late Mr. Mr. Leslie—There will be no difficulty in that ; because Clarkson for the two Mudies. Barnardeastl,..... •90120808 (i 4 6 7 0 - 8 6•• 'OO °6 Durham ---..... '9 0 10 37 0 80 4 9 6 6 7 0 1 1 ) ; 7 6 - ; i li a of their announced advent to power. It seems national contentment. That illusion vanished—error F arqu h a r, o f Fontbill Abbey, and his nephew, the late Mr. in the vestry of St. George, Hanover-square, there are , Mr. J a mes Ridgway, on being. sworn, said 'he carried on Richmond —........ 9011 it 7-0 .804680 9 6 10 0 0 0 7, 0 they have had their- emissaries and agents . in every ander died—and the reign of Nicholas and of terror George Mortimer, were in the nature of loans or gifts? 25 vestrymen who are Peers or Members of the House of the business of bookseller with his brother, at No. 169, 5t0ckt0n..................... 86 9 0 8 - 6 904050 8 (1 8 c 0 .0 - ____ —A The intestate, Mr. Farquhar, died in July, 1826, and upon Commons ; but, my Lord, I consider this is the proper Piccadilly. •The prisoner Holland lived as porter with them • WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET-Dee .4 ___. . .-.... . • ••• • ' -at. -a-1-- i NT -..- —L.... al. ----: _ 1 __l t. _ Wheat, Red, Norfclk and Suflblk ...... ... -3. 365. to :.... 43i . fine ~.: Poland be once more rased against him, which ex plains, what nothing else could explain, the rage and bloodthirsty spirit of liengsanee the natural efnet of extreme terror which seems to have dictated every ex pression of the Muscovite. The Journal de Frank- , fift, an organ of the Court of Russia, taken in . con nexion with the speech , never once attempts to shirk the accusation of having violated the treaty of Vienna, so that future political apologists for Russia had better drop that sort of special pleading.. The Frankfort article insists on the fact, that the y " Poles have at all times shown themselves averse to any Government, no matter what, which placed them under a foreign sceptre." What is this but an aggravation of the cruelty charged against Russia, and another argument in favour of the wisdom of those restraints imposed upon her by the negotiators of Vienna, who knew, acknowledged, and thus far respected, the patrio tic spirit of the Poles, and their inheront love of liberty ? As for the monstrous notion promulgated by the Holy Alliance, at the instance no doubt of Russia, that the partitioning Poland would prove the best recipe for destroying a focus of confusion in the centre of Europe, let us ask, has the event confirmed any such anticipation ? Has Poland ever been tranquillized by the cruelties practised against her ? Has the peace of Europe been promoted by this horrible invasion of the most sacred rights ? Has injustice or oppression ever proved a peacemaker? God forbid it should I Then for the ingratitude of Poland to Alexander—the ingratitude I of a captive towards his gaoler I How is the charge made good ? Alexander, forsooth, in 1820, made a speech to the Polish Diet ; for under the treaty of Vienna Poland had a Parliament ; but the Autocrat —" the happy accident "—reproached the Parliament of Poland with sedition—too common in our days —and for what ? Because, in the exercise of its in herent and undoubted rights, that national assembly had rejected some of the bills proposed by his Minis ters, and were • thus accused of sedition for having acted on laws which Alexander, in words, had acknowledged ; and sois it ever with the best of these barbarians—there is no reliance to be placed upon any nromisc they make, or one syllable they utter. For ten ;Tars, during" the remaining reign of Alexander, the Poles endured a constant succession of encroach ments and tyrannies upon their acknowledged rights. They buoyed themselves up with the hope that in some gleam of intellectual and political sunshine that Prince would return to the professions which he had abandoned—that he would rule ,them, not like serfs, but citizens—and, moreover, that he would fulfil the assurances repeatedly given of ra-uniting the whole of Poland, as • she existed before the first partition, to the territory of the modern duchy, which act, by combining together 12,000,000 of Poles, would have been itself the guarantee - for a system of government compatible with their freedom, and productive of their national contentment. That illusion vanished—Alex ander died—and the reign of Nicholas and of terror opened upon unhappy . Poland. That reign we need not describe, nor the incarnation of delegated barba rity under the atrocious Constantine. The first act of Nicholas was to dissipate all hope of rational or tolerable government—one specimen of cruelty was succeeded by a worse. He had been .deemed a savage too unmitigated for the Russians—was indemnified for the loss of his hereditary throne, by the vicarious sacrifice of Poland to his ferocity. He left the de spairing people no refuge but in revolt, and that last agony of nature is now cast up to them, as a justifica tion for heaping on their bleeding country fresh and unmeasured cruelties. Of these the most horrible is the deportation of thousands of Polish children, yearly, monthly, nightly—torn from their paternal homes, and degraded into a military slavery, through which they are destined by the brutal oppressor to become hereafter scourges of their native land. But of this devilish system we shall give some details at another opportu nity ; in the mean time let us make one observation. It has been always understood that to respect the free institutions of Poland appeared to the Russian Go vernment a policy fatal to the maintenance of the despotic principle over the inhabitants of Russia her self. " Therefore," say -the minions of the Musco vite, " we are excusable for enslaving Poland." " No," says common sense, and she is echoed by humanity, " it is a reason for not laying hands on Poland at all ; she never invited you, she never wronged you : your pretence is like that of a man who murders his neighbour, because simple robbery might be more embarrassing to him in the management of his own concerns." — Tries. The loss, and that within so short'a period, of three vessels bound with convicts to Van Diemen's Land, on each of which occasions nearly the whole of the crew and passengers have, perished, seems to call for some investigation. Had they been King's ships, rigid inquiries before successive Courts-martial must have taken place. As ships in the King's service— even-on that ground only, laying out of the question the common claims of justice and humanity, it is surely fitting that a similar investigation should take place. We are far from assuming or imputing blame to any one, when it may turn out that no blame whatever attaches ; but the feelings of the country, we appre hend, will not, and indeed ought not to be satisfied till it has been publicly shown that due care has been used, both as to the sea-worthiness of the vessels and the professional competence of those to whose charge they were confided. Those vessels are, we believe, generally, if not uniformly, taken up by the Transport Board, which we trust, be able to show that they were entrusted to competent crews and commanders, were in every respect sound and fit for service, and furnished by the Admiralty with proper and authentic charts. We repeat that we have no reason to suppose that in any of these respects the fact has been other wise ; but where so great a sacrifice of human life has taken place, and that in vessels of a country renowned for its maritime skill, it is surely incumbent upon those in whose department it lies to satisfy the public that no blame attaches anywhere.—Morning Herald. There never was a time when the cause of Reform was in greater danger than at the present moment. Under pretence of exciting sympathy, and raising sub scriptions in behalf of the Protestant Clergy of Ire land—left destitute, be it remembered, by the rejection of the Irish Church Bill of last Session—the Tories and their partisans are converting, not only their taverns lint their temples into rostrums, for pouring forth the most virulent denunciations against the Mel bourne Ministry. We alluded on Saturday to the meet ing at the Freemasons' Tavern, where the old , unmean .ing, and hypocritical cant of " Church in danger," was pealed through all its variations on the tocsin of Tory ism. Yesterday the alarm cry was re-echoed through several of the Churches, and .the ministers of the Gospel, following the example of their Graces of Canterbury and London, in appealing to their congregations for commiseration for their suffering brethren, in Ireland, endeavoured to awaken their fears by the assertion, that a scheme was in progress for the utter extirpation of the Protestant religion in the sister kingdom. The insinuation was broadly urged that the present Ministers are parties to the plot, and ready, for -the sake of- maintaining- their ascendancy, to fall .down and worship at the feet of Popery. - Such assertions are too monstrous to need comment, and we mention them only to show that, in the criminal zeal of perpetuating oppression and fraud, or the equal criminal desire of usurping office con trary to the national will, there are men who will not hesitate even to desecrate the temples of God by poli tical harangues and utterance of intentional falsehood, for we cannot believe any rational man so besotted as to believe it possible, that Popery could ever gain an ascendancy in this country, which constitutes the bur den of the High Church declamation. With regard to the Irish Clergy, we entertain the deepest sympa thy for their sufferings ; and in proport;on to the ex tent of this sympathy is our indignation, loathing, and abhorrence against those men who first rejected a most just and necessary measure, calculated as well to se cure them an ample provision as to tranquillize Ireland, ant who next inflict further injury on that same Clergy by identifying their cause with that of a faction whose countenance alone is so associated with evil that the holiest cause would, in the eyes of the nation, be dese crated by a connexion with it. If they could gain an ascendancy what would they regard the risk or sacrifice of human life, whether lay or clerical, in Ireland or England? Nothing. Every impartial observer must be aware of the utter impossibility of continuing .to levy . . .Our observations, on Saturday week, on the sub ject of the Tory intrigues to undermine the present Government, and bring about another coup de tat, bare brought upon us much correspondence and va rious communications. These generally confirm our previous impressions and information respecting the tietrerne activity of the enemy and of the general stir amongst the Cossacks and Sutlers of the Conservative camp, although we are, at the same time, happy to feel assured that the mines laid . with so much intelli gence and skill at Court have exploded without the slightest effect. Neither courtiers nor courtezans have tucceeded in making out their case, that it would be expedient, or wise, or sate, to run the risk of a dis solution, and a second re-action, for the grat.ifieation of their revenge, or for the sole promotion of their ex clusive interests. So far, so well. We are safe from immediate danger. Still the calm may be treache rous, and we must be on the look-out for squal ls, during every hour of the approaching session. We rely upon the ,vigilance of the Refor m Association to keep their machinery in order, and ready for action on Reformers of all css `ae must the-shortest summons , recollect that the eyes of the country are pon them. There must be the same cordial co-operation, and the same disinterested sacrifice of individual views and opi nions, to a general and hearty support of the Govern ment, which we have no do ubt the Ministers will have a right to claim from the undivided popular party, by • an early announcemeet of their measures of relief. Nothing would seem more unwise than premature at tempts to interfere with the present constitution of the House of Peers, on the part of Members not possessing sufficient influence to insure a majority on any motion for that purpose. The Peers must either abandon their opposition to the principles of measures .sent up to them by the Representatives of the People, or they must be reformed. Heap cinders on their heads I Dispatch the Bills in the House of Commons. Use no threatening language to be taken advantage of by the Lords as an apology to the country for then' conduct, and leave their Lordships to reconcile to their fellow-subjects, as best they may, a continued hostility to the progress of _improvement, and to the King's Government—that Government having the support of the House of Commons and of the people. If this course be followed with temper and patience, we ven ture to predict an utter failure of the hopes' and ex pectations of the Tories, and a peaceful and speedy accomplishment of the objects of all rational Re formers, even with regard to the unreformed institution of hereditary legislators, without qualification either of brains or estate. Our correspondents send us amusing descriptions of the means and devices by which . the Carlton Club faction have been paving the way of their announced advent to power. It seems they have had their- emissaries and agents in every Court and country in Europe, from Kalisch and Prague to Madrid and Lisbon, who have been employed to assure all foreigners of influence to whom they could obtain access, " on the autho rity of letters from the Mike of Wellington" (Sir Ro bert Peel is rather chary of his correspondence, and the Duke's name is a greater tower of strength with Autocrats and Carlists), that the King had made up his mind—that public opinion had changed universally in England—and that the dismissal of the Govern, merit and a dissolution of the Parliament would take place before the end of the year. Letters were simul taneously despatched to their Members of both Houses, and to friends who were to be started as candidates for new elections, to hold themselves in readiness to set off at a moment's notice. The Times, that veracious ba rometer of public feeling, announced the astounding fact that a reaction had taken place in favour of its new allies and proprietors. Sir Francis Bur dett was, induced—by what influence we will not say, although we have a shrewd suspicion we could point it out—to publish opportunely his let ter respecting Mr. O'Connell. In short, the plot had the appearaece of being so well got up, that we had some fears, at the moment, the main link of -it had been well secured in the purlieus of the Court, and we thought it our duty to sound the alarm to all ranks of the Liberal party. Although it seems there has been more smoke than fire, the one seldom appears without danger of the other; and we console ourselves with the reflection, that if we have ascribed more importaece than they deserve to the wretched tricks and intrigues of the miserable band of Conservative place 7 hunters, who are eternally busy in endeavouring to work their own ends through mischief and confusion, this is not the first time we have foiled them in their schemes, by a timely exposure of the mean and base arts by which alone they can aspire, in the present state of the representation, to a momentary usurpation of the powers of Government in this coun try. The Times may persevere, in its plaintive efforts, to ring in the ears of its readers Mr. O'Connell and the Catholics—the preponderance of Scotch and Irish Members in the Administration —and the various points of division and distraction by which its patrons hope to embarrass the Govern ment, and disturb the happy and peaceful condition of the country ; but we hope it will permit us to draw the distinction between its lucubrations—and .the effect produced by them upon the admirers of its consistency, and the real feeling and opinion of an honest and in telligent public. The Tories are what they hare ever been, in all times and in all ages—servile courtiers— or panders to the worst passions of the ignorant and uninformed—as the worship of the high or the low was most likely to promote their views ; unprincipled and unfettered by any rules, or any considerations, save those of self-interest and public plunder—over bearing in prosperity—mean and cringing in adver sity, and, when the good sense and restored power of the people have reduced them to their natural posi tion in the ranks of opposition, as little scrupulous in this age as their forefathers were in former ones, as to the dirty paths through which they would pick their way to the " crib and manger" of, we had almost said (though a regard for his former services to the people scarcely justifies us in using the term) their new ally, . the Member for Westminster. --Morning Chronicle. There was never a question on whiCh the minds of men were more unanimous, or their better feelings more excited, than on this which has now become a staple subject of alarm and discussion in every family—we mean the terrible series of crimes perpetrated by Russia s• against the Polish nation. It is not merely because this catalogue of outrages has been a disgrace to the age, and an insult to every civilized commonwealth in Eu rope, that all people of every rank in society, and every shade of politics, are now inflamed against their barba rous and unchriitian authors;—that moral ground of hostility to the Russian Despot is not the only one. The people feel everywhere—the people of J Great Britain, France, and Germany—that the faith of treaties has been tramniad on with as little seeming compunc tion as the laws of hu man ity an d re li g i on . The.people . feel everywhere that it is not alone the wound thus in flicted upon the cause of freedom abstractedly, or the reinforcement gained by that of arbitrary. power, in the utter extinction of a martial and independent State, which affects the welfare of all surrounding countries, but that the honour of each particular Government, a party to the peace of Vienna, the safety of the nation represented by such Government, and the general maintenance of law and justice throughout Christen ' doin, are all concerned in the repression and puniSh ment of au attack upon an illustrious race of men—an attack so fraught with wickedness, and so menacing and dreadful as an example. The speech of Nicholas to the municipality of Warsaw, the truth of which, at first, few persons thought ill enough of human nature to credit—that speech, which the benevolent speaker nas• since had the frankness to authenticate—that speech delivered in the blindness of imperial wrath, has by a just dispensation of Providence been most benefi cial to the cause of Poland. It has powerfully strengthened and corroborated the deep moral impression existing throughout the world in condemnation of Russia, and in favour of the Poles. Had no other This case came before the Court nearly a fortnight ago, and the arguments which, from time to time had been de ferred, were only concluded to-day. The case came before the Court on two sets of exceptions to the Master's report, taken by the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Trezerant, and by the defendant, Mr. Frazer. Both sets, though they dif fered in point of form, were the same in substance. The facts, as they appeared from the statement of Counsel, were as follow :—The question which the Court had to decide was whether certain transactions between the late Mr. Farquhar, of Fonthill Abbey, and his nephew, the late Mr. George Mortimer, were in the nature of loans or gifts ? The intestate, Mr. Farquhar, died in July, 1826 , and upon that occasion administration to his estate was taken out by the defendant, Mr. Frazer, one of the next of kin. Mr. and Mrs. Trezevant, who were also next of kin, subse quently filed a bill for an account. In March, 1830, a decree was made, which, after ordering the usual accounts to be taken, directed that a reference should be made to the Master for the purpose of ascertaining what part of the intestate's estate was outstanding, and whether any, or what, proceedings should be taken for the recovery of the same. Under this inquiry a state of facts was taken in, charging the estate of Mr. Mortimer with sums amounting to 40,0001., which it was alleged he had received from Mr. Farquhar. The result of this inquiry was, that the Master reported that a sum of 20,0001. was only due. Mr. Frazer, in his double capacity of administrator and next of kin, being dissatisfied with the Master's finding, filed exceptions, and the plaintiffs also filed exceptions. These exceptions were now before the Court. The case mainly turned upon the evidence as to the sig nature and handwriting of Mr. Farquhar, and upon this point the evidence was very voluminous and contradictory. Mr. BEAMES, on the part of the representatives of Mr. G. Mortimer, contended that Mr. Frazer could not avail himself of the evidence put in issue by the plaintiff. His Honour the MASTER of the ROLLS overruled the objection. Mr. PEMBERTON was heard at great length on behalf of Mr. Frazer, in support of the exceptions. Mr. BICKERSTETII appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Trezevant, in support of the exceptions. Mr. BEAMES and KoE appeared for the representatives of the late Mr. G. Mortimer. Mr. Leslie—There will be no difficulty in that ; because in the vestry of St. George, Hanover-square, there are 25 vestrymen who are Peers or Members of the House of Commons ; but, my Lord, I consider this is the proper place to make the application. As one of the vestrymen of St. George, Hanover-square, from which parish this Jury, and also the Jury for the Court of King's Bench are summoned, I know that a very great deal of time, care, and expense, are bestowed every year in fram ing (according to the Act of Parliament known as Sir Robert Peel's Act) a list of men qualified to serve on juries, all the other parishes in the county are required to do the same. These various lists of jurors arc eventually placed in the hands of the sheriff, and form what the Act terms " The Juror's Book for the year." The parish of St. George, Hanover-square alone have this year contri buted 2,138 names, and as the custom of the sheriff is and has been to summon 48 jurors for each of the four terms in the year, it follows that, for the Court of King's Bench, the Court of Common Pleas, and your Lordship's Court, St. George's parish alone could supply the whole of these juries for nearly four years. Your Lordship will bear in mind that all the parishes in the county are also required to make an annual list of men qualified to serve on juries. To illustrate the complaint I make, I submit to your Lordship the number of days the forty-eight jurors I represent on this occasion have served ; the 3d, 16th, 18th, 26th, 28th, 30th of November, the Ist, 2d, 3d, 4th and sth December, in all eleven days between the 3d of November and this day. I need not point out to your Lordship the great inconvenience and loss of time the gentlemen of the Jury are compelled to submit to, with some of whom their time is the only means of deriving their income ; for example, professors of music, who can not perform their business of instruction by deputy. I now, my Lord, call your attention to the Act of Parliament, the 6th of George IV., cap. 50, clause 15, which directs the Sheriff to summon any number of jurors not less than forty eight, nor more than seventy-two. Now, I beg your Lord ship's attention to these words which follow :—" Unless by the direction of the Judges appointed to hold the assizes or sessions of nisi pries, or one of them, who are and is em powered to make a greater or lesser number." , Lord ABINGER—Then you wish that seventy-two should be summoned, instead of forty-eight, so to divide the duties ? Mr. Leslie—Not so, my Lord ; I go further than that, with your Lordship's permission. Lord ABINGER—To every writ of venire a pannel of Mr. James Ridgway, on being sworn, said be carried on the business of bookseller with his brother, at No. 169, Piccadilly. The prisoner Holland lived as porter with them for nine months, up to last November, the period when he absconded. From certain suspicions which witness was led to entertain, he was induced to ask the prisoner if he had stolen any booksbelonging to the stock ? The prisoner re plied he had not. An investigation having taken place, wit ness discovered that the firm had been plundered to a large amount. Witness went the next day to the auction-rooms of Messrs. Grimston and Havers, and there found a quan tity of the property, which was subsequently traced to the prisoner. Afterwards witness went with a police officer to the shop of Messrs. P. and C. Mudie, in Princes-street, and asked those parties if they had bought any of their publica tions ? Mr. C. Mudie produced a number of books and said he had purchased them from Holland, who had represented to them that he .was a bookbinder in Messrs. Ridgway's em ploy, and that he received the books in payment of his labour. Witness asked if the books then produced were all that they had, and being answered in the affirmative went away. The next morning Peter Mudie produced 89 numbers of a work belonging to prosecutors, which he hadpurchased from Hol land, but which he said he had overlooked the previous day. Witness afterwards went to the shop of Mr. R. Jolly, but that individual was not at home. The defendant Jolly called in Piccadilly on prosecutor and said the reason why he had not called before was, that he had been waiting for his solicitor, who was at that time engaged. Prosecutor asked him if he called about that parcel of books which he had sold to a dealer named Mason for 31/. The defendant replied he had, and added that he had bought that parcel of books from a person in King-street (Holland) ' • that he had given 24/. for them, which he considered to be a fair price. Prosecutor answered that some difference would arise on that 'point, and defendant remarked that if he had done anything wrong he was responsible. Prosecutor then asked him if he had bought any more books from Holland, to which Jolly at first replied he had not, but afterwards admitted he had. The prices stated to have been given for some of the works were as follow :—Six volumes of Canning's Speeches, new and uncut, 305., selling price 3/. 12s. ; Sweet's Hortus Britannicus, Bs., selling price 21s. ; Colling-wood's Life, 65., selling price 16s. ; and in like proportion. The parcel of books bought by Jolly for 24k was worth about 65/. at selling price. A parcel bought. by Peter Mudie for 4/. 'was worth at selling price about 141. When the officer succeeded in taking Holland, prosecutor told him not to say anything if he objected, as all he chose to state would be used against him. The prisoner however said he wished to relate the particulars of his offence. • WAKEFIELD CORN MARKET--Dec. 4 Wheat, Red, Norfolk and Sullen( ...... —s. 365. to —s. fine 435. .--.Lin. and Cam. -- Yorkshire —a. 375. to —s. fine 4 3 " ----- white Foreign, Ited —s. —s. to —a. fine --'• White —5. —s. to —I. one --_-?' Barley, Norfolk and Suffolk Lincolnshire Yorkshire Wold 29a. to 31s. fine 3d Foreign Beans, Old 335. to 41s. fine ---.' •-•--..-•••• New Oats, Potato —s. to 245. fine =Qs' Poland —l. —a, to 24r.. fine 2tO• Friesland and Small —s. 16s. to Ifis. fine '2o' Mealing Shelling Malt —s. 365. fir.e 425. per 1 ,03c1 " Rapeseed —l. Os 361. Os. 401. Os. per Lsit" • SCOTCH MARKETS. Wheat.- Barley. Oats. !scans. tiatine, Aberdeen 25 to 30 21 to 25 14 to 10 —to 21 1 0 :3.2 Berwick 24 2; 15 .20 13. 18 22 21 2' 3 ~ Coldstream - ~ Cupar (Fife: , 4 1 8 56 26 31 16 22 22 26 -- ~ Dundee Elgin 4O 50 24 26 16 tit) 23 30 -.. ' 1;1 Inverness 3B - 40 28 20 21 24 32 33 -- .., Kelso 125 29 17 21 14, 16 19 21 -- 4l Kirkaldy . 1 37 42 23 31 20 23 45 48 43 - Perth IL -- , - ,, The size of the measure varies throughout the cottntryt.e/ EDINBURGI We had a middling supply El CORN of all kind RKET. ; of Grain tc —Dec. `..1. .day, and thi te sales oe't rather heavy. Oats. Pease. Bean c 4 22s Sd. 345. (Al. 31 , •„ 20 0 30 0 311 0 17 4 :.6 0 23 Wheat. Barley. First 42s. NI. 30s. Second 0 .23 0 Third 30 0 2:1 0 Average price of Wheat 1/ PRICES OF PROVISIONS, &C. Beef, per 1b........ Os. 40. to Os. 6d.' Freshßutter, 10.1. to.s. iq Mutton 0' 4 0 6 Salt Ditto... 0 s 0 0 Veal 0 5 0;9 Ditto, per cu 0 S 2 33- 0 5 Eggs, per dos. 0 0 1 6 Lamb, per qr. —0 0 0 0 OatStraw(kpl.)-- 9 0 9 0 Tallow, cwt.......... 33 0 37 0 Wheat Ditto—. 8 6 y 6 Quartern Loaf .... U5l 0 6 Barley Ditto 6 6 . 0 Potatoes, 141 b. ..... 0 :-f, 0 0 Hay, per 0 9 ' 15s. 0,1. Mr. PEMBERTON replied. His HONOUR reserved his judgment. THURSDAY. THE LION ALE EREWERY.—BROADWOOD V. GORING. This was a motion for the purpose of obtaining the sanc tion of the Court to the sale of certain partnership pro perty. In 1815 Mr. Broadwood and Mr. Goring entered into partnership as ale brewers, and upon that occasion articles were drawn' up, but not executed. By these ar ticles it was provided that the shares of the partners should be equal, that both parties should give an equal degree of attention to the business, and that the partnership should continue for twenty-one years. Up to 1824 Mr. Broad wood continued, in conjunction with Mr. Goding, to attend to the business ; but at that period Mr. Broadwoed pro posed residing abroad, and to allOw Mr. Goding 1,0001. per annum, in addition to his share of the profits, out of the trade, for the trouble and necessary confinement in super intending the concern. To -this Mr. Goding acceded, and by his zeal succeeded in nearly doubling the profits. Mr. Broadwood, in the interim, resided on the Continent, and remained abroad till 1829, when he returned, and a settle ment was called for, but Mr. Broadwood declined making the stipulated allowance of 1,000/. per annum for management, and no settlement had since been come to, Proposals were made for winding up the partnership concern, and Mr. Goding expressed his readiness to refer the matter at issue to arbitration, but to this Mr. Broadwood would not con sent in the form suggested, and filed his bill to have a de= claration that the partnership was dissolved, and that the accounts might be taken. Under these circumstances the present motion was made to have an immediate sale of the partnership property. In opposition to the motion it was contended that as in the course of things the partnership would dissolve on the last day of the present manth, the motion was unnecessary and premature. His Honour the MASTER of the ROLLS thought that the best course he could adopt would be to let the matter stand over to the first day of next term. EDINBURGH MEAL There was a middling supply of 04 sales were rat her heavy. L MARKET.—Dec. 1 . tij e atraeal at this day's market, a& Per Sack of 280:1). Imp. First Oatmeal Second ditto Per Stone of 141 b. Imp. g First Oatmeal X () I Second ditto Barleymeal 0 ; 4 Peasemeal P25.—.3t1,14.5.--4th, 16s.—pea1)!_:/ Barley m cat 1 3 0 . .. ... Peasenieal I 3 0 Pot Barley—N.. 1. per cwt. 10s.-2d. GLASGOW CORN jurors is annexed. Mr. Leslie—l am aware of that, my Lord ; but I can see no obstacle in the way of the plan I propose. Sup pose, my Lord, this Jury had served ten days, and a sufficient number of jurors for three Juries were sum moned for each day the Court has sat, there would have been 360 names on the pannel instead of 48 ; the first 36 names on the pannel would have been _for the 3d of November, the second 36 for the 16th of November, and so on ; each juror would have then only had one day to attend the Court, instead of the whole 48 being required . to attend the whole time. Then, my Lord, there is another very great grievance to the common jurymen to be required to attend the Court when Special Jury cases are ap pointed to be tried. If parties are anxious to have, and go to the expense of having a Special Jury summoned, that Special Jury ought to be compelled to attend, and the Common Jurors set at liberty, to pursue their own business. in no one case during the present sitting-of the Court, has the Special Jury been made up without a tales being prayed for ; in one case eight Common Jurors went into the box, only four out of the twenty-four Special Jurors summoned answered to their names. Lord ABINGER—SO much the better, for the Common Jury and the Special Jurors are liable to a fine. Mr. Leslie—No, my Lord, the time of the Common Jury is of more importance than any pecuniary considera tion ; and I know the Special Jurymen are liable to a floe ; but in point of fact, have you fined any of them for non-attendance ? A moderate business doing in C Wheat, per `2401b. 8. d. B.d. British, old 210t0210 -- new l4O 190 Canada, free 2:10 25 0 Irish Barley, per 3201 b English 23 Q .26 0 Scottish 2O 0 21. 6 Irish A long argument ensued between the Counsel as to the admission of the prisoner's statement. The Bench observed at present it would not be received as evidence. Mr. Ridgway continued—The prisoner then said that he was walking down Princes street, with a parcel of waste paper to sell for his uncle, when he was accosted by Chris topher Mudie, who said to him if the parcel had been books he would have bought any quantity of him ; the next day he stole a book, and sold it to Christopher Mudie, and from that time continued to sell him stolen books ; while in Mudie's shop Jolly came in, and remarked, on seeing the publications, that they appeared to be excellent works ; Jolly then went out at the same time as he did, and asked him to take some brandy and water ; while drinking the liquor, Jolly said, " Don't let them (meaning the Mudies) have all the advantages, give me a turn ;" and lie would take care nothing was discovered, as he would send the books to York, or words to that effect ; prisoner accordingly got some books, and sold a parcel at his lodgings to Jolly for 24/. Mr. Mason, book-dealer, said he bought the parcel from Jolly for 31/. ; the books were afterwards sold to another dealer, named Cooper, for 36/. The prices marked at the back of the works went for nothing in the trade. Publica. tions could always be bought much lower in the trade than they were marked. Scott's works, published at 9/. 95., could be had for 2/., and " Lodge's Portraits," published at 20/., for 6/. In witness's opinion the prices given by Jolly for the books were very fair. He had known the brothers for son - 14_ time, and they had always borne a respectable name in the trade. . Air. Cooper, book-dealer, gave 36/. to Mr. Mason for the books. This was a long price, but. he gave it because some of the books made up sets of other books which he had The prices given by Jolly for the books were as much, in most of the cases, as he should have offered. After the evidence of Mr. Havers, the auctioneer, who merely pointed out the parties who had sent the books to his rooms for sale, Mr. Clarkson proceeded to address the Bench on behalf of his clients, the Mudies. In the case of Peter Mudie the evidence appeared -so slight that the prosecutor consented to his discharge. Christopher Mudie was committed, but the Bench con sented to receive bail. The other defendant (Jolly) begged to be allowed to sLy a few words in defence. With regard to the conversation stated by Holland to have been held with them, he declared it was an entire falsehood. The transactions with the pri soner were purely matters of business, and he had given fair prices for all the books he had bought. The Bench intimated their intention of also accepting bail for Jolly, and then fully committed Holland. • Lord ABINGER—If you place in writing the objections and the grievances you complain of, and the plan you pro pose to remove them, I will take care that your statement be laid before the twelve Judges, who no doubt. will be anxious to do everything in their power to render the ne c2ssary attendance of the gentlemen of the Jury as little inconvenient to them as possible. Mr. Leslie—Then I have the permission of the Court to make the statement to the Judges. Lord ABlNGER—Certainly, and it shall be attended to. Mr. Leslie—l beg to thank your Lordship for the kind attention you have favoured me with. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HO USE. A boy named William Nicholls, and a young woman named Lydia Burgess, were brought before the LORD M AY on, charged with having robbed Mr. Kelly, a printer in Houndsditch. The circumstances were remarkable as stated by the witness. The lad is only fourteen years of age, and was e mployed as an errand boy by Mr. Kelly, and the young woman, who is about 22 or 23 years old, was servant in the house. The former slept out of the house, but was in the hr.bit of going to his work at six o'clock in the morning, when he was let in by the latter. For some time Mr. Kelly has missed sums of money from his drawer, but could not guess how it had been stolen, as.the lock was patent. He, however, took various precautions. In the meantime the servant girl was discharged for laziness. Some money which was marked by an officer was left in the drawer, and soon afterwards it was found in the pocket of the boy, who at once confessed that he had been plundering his master from time to time of gold and silver ' but solemnly declared that he was in duced to co mmit the depredations by the fe male prisoner, who showed him how to open the drawer, and took a very disproportionate share of the profits. Upon one occasion he stole a sovereign and a sixpence, and she took the sovereign, and he was obliged to be satisfied with the sixpence. Mr. Kelly, upon hearing this account, caused the woman to be taken into custody, and succeeded in discovering that she had robbed him of some trifling articles, but could not get any evidence confirmatory of the statement of the boy. The old woman who nursed the illigimate child of the fe male prisoner, and who had a quarrel with her about pay ment for nursing, produced two plates, a cup, and a pair of gloves which had belonged to Mr. Kelly, and which the nurse said the girl put into the hands of her daughter. The LORD MAYOR asked the prisoners if they had any thing to say ? The boy said that he had been urged by the female pri soner tO 4is master 1.1.144§119iu412.4 thA A WALKING GENTLEMAN.—A person of middle stature commenced walking from gate to gate in the town of Cowbridge a few days since, and accomplished the dis tance of fourteen miles in one hour and forty-nine minutes, the roads being much against him in consequence of the rain. On leaving the town, the next day, he walked into a public-house, and called for a pint of beer ; after drink ing which (in the absence of the landlord) he " walked" off with a great coat. The public are requested to be aware of this " walking gent." . _ 4.7 Wednesday evening, between six and seven o'clock, two coaches, one going out of this town, on its way to Leeds, and another coming, in, met at the top of Wade-street, and came in contact. The pole and - Splinter bar of one were broken, but no personal injury was sustained by any of the passengers.—Halifax Express. The celebrated Siamese twins, who landed at Dover last week from America, after sojourning a few days at Worthington's Hotel, embarked on board te Firefly packet for Calais, on their way to Paris. St. Martin's fair com menced the day after their arrival ; but the young gentle men, it appears, are already in circumstances which place them above itinerant exhibition, and consequently no offers could induce krn to delay longer than was necessary their ....... rump to fulfil an engagement at Paris, evidence of the fact been forthcoming, it has attested the :truth of every statement the worst and most iroproachful to Russian character that had ever t , Before transpired. It has done-more than this, for am! threatening tone of the discourse r i4m4:-,proved that there is a consciousness of in .aiiietinty -in the heart of Nicholas, a dread of re action, and a doubt of the result, should the arms of KING'S BENCH-SATURDAY WATTS V. FRASER AND MOYES. (Concluded from The Sun of Saturday.) • Mr. Richard Allen, a clerk in the Stamp-office, produced the Alfred newspaper of the 6th of January, 1833 ; the United Service Gazette of the 13th of September, 1834, and the 30th of August, 1834 ; and the Old England of the 9th of February, 1834. An affidavit of the 29th of January, 1833, was, put in. It stated that the plaintiff was the printer of the United Service Gazette. Mr. Henry Quin—l was at one tine connected with the United Service Gazette. Mr. George Hyde was at one time my partner. Mr. Watts applied to me to unite the Alfred and the Old England. I understood that he was the proprietor of the Alfred. We made printing arrangements with respect to the United Service Gazette, of which he said he was the proprietor. He was the author of the article of the 20th of August. I believe he was so of the article of the 13th of September. There was no proof•of the authorship of the other articles. Sir F. PoLLocx then objected that the article from the United Service Gazette could not be reod, on the ground that the Act of Parliament which required affidavits. and papers to be deposited at the Stamp-office only made such papers evidence for " the plaintiff, informant, or prosecutor," and not for the defendant., Mr. EuLE insisted that the paper was evidence, since it was deposited at the Stamp-office in the performance of a public duty required by the statute. Lord DENMAN was of opinion that the purposes for which papers could be given in evidence under the statute were limited to the plaintiffs, informan ts, or prosecutors ; without the statute the paper would not be evidence at all. The evidence must be rejected. The same objection afterwards prevailed as to the other papers. Mr. H. B. llanshall was called to supply this deficiency in the evidence, by proving the identity of the copy of the paper deposited at the Stamp-office ; be was, however, un able to prove this. Cross-examii.ed—The plaintiff never had anything to do with the Satirist. It was at one time printed at the ina chine, but. he begged witness to leave off printing it. Wit ness did so. Little, a printer, who had been in the plaintiff's employ ment, proved that one time he had occasionally sent the proofs of the Satirist to the plaintiff, who objected to some of the articles, and they were expunged. The articles were those against Mr. Divas.—(A laugh.) Cross-examined—Witness applied to plaintiff only as a friend who happened to be under the. same roof, to look over the proofs of •the Satirist, and to advise about the articles. The people at the office were much annoyed by the applications about picas, and that led to talcin :A RKET.—Dee. rain ; little alteration in prIC!S• d, lOats, per 2641 b. s. d. Irish l5 C le .10 British l7 6 Beans, per 2601 b. " 0 English Scottish Pease, Scottish l atish Oatmeal, per 1401 b l3 0 4;0 Flour, per 2solb 2O 0 '' CORNWALL MARKETS. Calculated at 24 gallons to the bushel.) Oat 4 Wheat. Barley. i 0ata...4 a. d. to s. d. s d. to s. d. 3. d. to- t u Trur0...... Helstone St. Austell... Bodmin 0 16 0— 0 8 6 .... 0" 1 , 41 Liskeard 1 0 13 o. 0 6 3 . 0 ~ 6 Launceston 0 19 6 0 9 0 ._ 0 ; 6 Camelford l4 0 Id 0 8 6 9 0 6 0 / ° Penzance l6 0 16 6' 0 8 0_ 0 MINING INTELLIGENCE. Tons. Cwt. ti li Quantity of Cc,ppei Ore sold 2 685 21 Quantity of tine Copper 026 3 " Average Produce 614 ~, Amount'of Sale, 18,5 M. Is. tat —Average Standard, 1141. 10, LA' MEETINGS OF CREDITORS TO-MORRO\ ,t T. C. Greatorex, picture-dealer, Charley-street, Grosvenor-square I f. Arnell, corn-merchant, FAlward.street, Hampstead-road ....... 5 Hutchinson, lodging-house-keeper, Essex-street, Strand ..... • g H. It dhead, linen-draper, King. ton-upon-Hull B. Angle, licensed-victualler, Moortields J. Taylor, coal-m•rchatit, Charles-street, Grosvenor-square It. W. Stephens, warehouseman, York-street, City-road M. and W. King, millers, Kingsley, Hampshire P. Cutler, s_n., miller; Ewell, Surrey MERLIN THE ENCHANTER.—M. Hersart de eri Villemarque, a student of the Ecole. des Chartes, has late discovered, in the sacristan of the parish, of MontaPr Noires, the precious Ossianic poems of the b a rd 6tl le , Clen, supposed to have been the famous Merlin, so l e g s brated in legendary romance. M. Guizot int en ds ;0 L I " those valuable relics translated and published. BIRTHS. fP . On the 4th inst., in Great Cumberland-place, th e l a dy o Basset,Esq.,of a son. On the 3(.1 inst., the lady of Thomas Brue, Esq., of a son." On the 29th ult., in Bruton-street, at Lady Elizabeth , Mrs. Robert Palk, of a son. On the sth inst., at Woodberry, Stoke Ne w ingt on , the 13 J. T. Berkley, Esq., of a son. On the 4th inst., in Church-row, Hampstead, the lady of CI , ' F. J. Lord, Esq., surgeon, of a daughter. l° On the 3(1 inst., the wife of John James Wilso n , E s q., surg e Northampton-square, of a son. MARRIED. t° l ' On the 24th ult., at Paris, Captain Picozzi, to Jane A. lc ,b, second daughter of F. Alfeston, E sq ., o f West-square, Lam,,,be," 01 0 On the Ist inst., at Straloch, Ab er d eens hi re , C apta i n 110' i Shepherd, of the lion. East Indi a C om p an y' s S erv i ce , Barbara, youngest daughter of the late Alexander Innes, Esl Pitmedden. Ore On the 3d inst., at St. Marylebone new Chur c h, J. lerr„ g le Esq., of South-street, Manchester-square, to Mary, second cla" ter of Mr. George Whitefoot, of Fulha m . Jo 4 On the 26th ult., at Christ Church, St. Marylebone , 4 .0" Smallpeice, Esq., of Guildford , to D. Palmer, w id ow a nd re d the Rev. N. Palmer, late Minister of th e E ng li s h Episcopal Chs at Honfleur. On the sth inst., at Trinity Church, Islington, Thomas L° borough, Esq., of St. Thomas-street, Southwark, solicitor, W Miller, of Woodside, Cheshire. DIED. Tz b 4# On the 4th inst., at the house of h er aun t, M rs . G o df re y =-° Richmond, Surrey, Miss Sarah Bacon, late of Norwich. c eP On the 4th inst., at Aston Hall, Yorkshire, in her 84t 1 " Ann, widow of the late Ha rr y V ere l s t, E sq . ,'' ' On the sth inst., Anna Maria, wife of Tho mas Vi gne , Ds' Wooiford, Essex. JP On the 30th ult., at his daughter's, in Bi s b opsga t c - s treetZ i William Smethergell, aged 86, professor of music, upwards years organist at the Churches of St. Mary-at-Hill; Billing'', a and Allhallows Barking, Tower-street. On the 3d inst., in Great Russell-street, Bloomsbury, 31.a 14' wife of Mr. William Pulfortl, and daughter of the late Charl vester, Esq. Londonl tainted and Publi6hed by MURDO YOUNG, .°f• 112, Strand, at The Sun, Office, No. In, Strand, in the c° of Middlesex. G R. The ti iii r titi3 tatio n at !uld Four 2 Whi ___ 2 _____ TH' That pointed IlEsnay, noon, i s Pr opr i et , Director: Honoura therei n s Tll e II gether w 1, 411 fon house. Til4t 1 to Le hel 16th Dt 8P CI, whereof to make dain a 11 tonsiden co'iei prieters The General tion of t th e :134 " if cornl) tains Ne 2 001. p c of the la the ta9tli Court ei in ' " the The Oren nt subjact to thy F Mons, it whom n That Under t Ithich Factory • _Lo'N Sc NVII Additioi A r at Ulu ralict, 3 c Lond S C( 4 Thor Char J.c Jam( John S. Z The TIoN and a c to the Tabl Comp & At t on th e Cent. tddiiio Pro i lends Insu days fr 449, prieto i town and 1,1 dated or oth, titioni tent, c th e p ( tern p for a Coon( Lo t Dr. VA• NEI the OF 1; Voi . vent the • , 1119.g1 Of c M S kre( M emit 2 a 1 .11,; nt. - ------- (ADVERTISEMENT.)—T. COX SAVORY, Goldo ° o &c., 47, Cornhill, London, informs the Public, that be °o) DESSERT FRUIT,KNIVES "and FORKS, with plain !,et) handles, silver ferrules, plated on s t ee l bl a d es , at Three (-;'?',, t ,e' dozen pair, or with solid silver blades, at Eight Guineas and Half per dozen pair. N.B. Carved ivory handles at 13s. 61 extra per dozen 14_;•>, res u l ......-___ s Ilesa an ( .L zitt 110, tb , .14,e 1 ) I I hi /II ' ;,, ti . S A