The Sun. — London, England, 1846-04-21 00:00:00

13ILLS in PARLIAMENT , ItAILWAY AND PROCEEDING'S THEREUPON. The following are the railway Bills that have been re ad a second time in the House. of Commons up to the a djournment of the House fur the Easter recess, with the dates of the second readings : Aberdeen, 1 3 ant 1, and Elgin—March 30 Airdrie and Bathgate Junction—March 6 Alford Valley—March 4 Ambergate, Nottingham, and Boston—March 11 Arbroath and Forfar Ashburton, Newton, and South Devon—Feb. 16 Aylesbury and Thames Junction—Feb. 20 Ay rehire and Galloway—Feb. 26 Ayrshire, Bridge of Weir, and Purt Glasgow Junction —Feb. 23 Ballochney (Shott'a branch)—Feb. 25 Ban tinhire—nlarch 23 Birmingham, Lichfield, and Manchester —April 8 Birmingham, Wolverhampton, and Dudley—March 27 Birnaingliam, Wolverhampton, and Stour Valley (Bir miagliam, ‘Volverhampton, and Dudley lines)—March 23 Birmingham. Wolverhampton, and Stour Valley (Stour Valley line) —March 23 Blackburn, Cho; ley, and Liverpool—Feb. 16 Blackbi rn and Pr.-ston—F , b. 16 B:aeiburn, Clitherue, and North-Western Junction— April 2 Blackburn, Darwen, end Bolton—April 2 Blackburn, Fre,ton, and East Lancashire (Railway Amalgamation)—F&s. 24 Boston, StaKitord, and Birmingham (Stamford to Wi , bech Line)—Llo , il 1 Bridgewater and i&neb , ad Rail way and Pier—F- b. 25 Bridgewater and Taunton Canal, Railway, and Har bour—April 1 Brighten and Chichester (Bognor and Littlehampton Branches)—F , . b 18 Bristol and Birmintzharn svr,rl i i t i n n t hl l_ Li F r e c h h . 2 2 ; Britt ~ 1 a,,d Exeter (, rywk Tr . '" lit -in,ng,a.m and Glnucen. Bristol and d ter— NI •rch '7 (Glnuc_.ster Sr, mehuute Bristol an,d tiirmiu,e,hana Junction) —March 27 oand Wales Junction — Feb. 20 1 1 3 3 ritl ue s kint , ain (Oxfofd and Bletch ley Junction)—April 8 Buckinghamshire Railway (Clang to Banbutn ) March 27 Caledonian (Dumfries Branches)—April 8 Caledonian and Dunibartunshire Junction—Feb. 25 Caledonian (Carlisle Deviation)—March 23 Caledonian (Clydesdale Junction Railway Deviations —March 23 Caledonian (Dundyvan Branch)—April 8 !Caledonian (Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge Branches)—April Caledonian (Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge Railway Purchase)— /a rch 23 Caledonion (Glasgow Termini and Branches) March 23 Caledonian (Langholm Branch) —March 23 Caledonian (Leith Junction) —April 8 Caledonian (Mid Lothian Branches) —April 8 Caledonian (Northern Direct)--March 23 Caledonian (Polloc and Govan and Clydesdale Junc tion Railways Amalgamation) — M arch 23 Cambridge and Oxford—Feb. 24 _ Cameron's Coalbrook S tea m Coal and Swansea and Loughor—April 7 Campbeltown Harbour, Waterworks, Paving, Light ing, and Watching—April 7 Carnwath and 'West Linton—Feb. 25 Chard Canal —April 1 Cheltenham and Oxford—Feb. 23 Chichester and Bognor—March 19 Chichester, Portsmouth, and Fareham—March 9 Ciitheroe Junction—March 4 Cockermouth and Workington Extension—March 5 Colchester, Stour Valley, Sudbury, and Halstead— March 2 Coagleton and Crewe—March 9 Cornwall—March 26 Coventry, Nuneaton, Birmingham, and Leicester— March 11 Deeside —March 4 Derby and Crewe Junction—March 9 Derby, Gainsborough, and Great Grimsby Junction— March 2 Direct Birmingham and Leicester—March 17 Dover and Deal—March 9 Dudley Canal and Birmingham Canal Companies Junction Amalgamation—March 23 East and West India Docks and Birmingham Junc tion—April 6 East and West Yorkshire Junction—Feb. 23 East Coast—March 2 5 East Dereham and Norwich—March 27 Eastern Counties (Epping Extension)—March 6 Eastern Union and Harwich—March 2 Eastern Union (Ardleigh to Colchester)—March 9 Eastern Lancashire (Deviation and Branches) — March 3 East Lincolnshire—Feb. 16 East Lothian Central Tyne Valley—March 5 East of Fife—April 8 Edinburgh and 13athgate—March 30 Edinburgh and Glasgow and Scottish Central— March 25 Edinburgh and Glasgow (Amendment and Branches) —Feb. 25 Edinburgh and Glasgow and Forth and Clyde Navi gation Junction—March 25 Eliaburgh and Glasgow and Wishaw and Coltness— March 25 Edinburgh and Glasgow, Isionkland and IFEArkintilloch, Ballochney and Slamannau Junction—March 25 Edinburgh, Leith, and GrAnton A mendment—Marcb 23 Edinburgh and Leith—Feb. 20 Edinburgh and Northern (Branches from the Dundee and Arbroath Railway, and Tay Ferry Improvement)-- Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Northern (Dunfermline Branch) — March 4 Edinburgh and Northern (Kinross, Woodmill, and Newburgh Branches)—Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Northern (Lochgelly and Leslie Ex tensions)—Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Northern (Newport and St. Andrew's Branch)—Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Northern (Pettycnr and Perth Har bour, Branches and Deviations)—Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Northern (Strathearn Deviation) — Feb. 23 Edinburgh and Peebles—Feb. 25 Ely and Bury—March 9 Enfield and Edmonton--March 4 Epsom and Dorking,—Feb. 16 Exeter and Exmouth—Feb. 23 Exeter, Topsham, and Exmouth—Feb. 23 Exeter, Yeovil, and Dorchester—March 13 Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding Junction— Feb. 27 Furness and Windermere—March 25 General Terminus and Glasgow Harbour—Feb. 20 Glasgow, Airdri', and Monk land Junction—March 30 Glasgow and Belfast Union—March 16 Glasgow, Barrhead, and Neilston Direct (Branches to Thornliebank, Honsehil!, and Hurlet)—March 9 Glisg,ow, Barrhead, and Ncilston Direct (Branches to Paisley) —March 23 Glasgow, Dutnfrie,=, and Carlisle—Feb. 23 Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge Extension-- March 23 Glasgow Harbour Grand Junction (Railway Termi nus)—March 11; Gla,gour Harbour Mineral-I'th. 25 C Issgow, Kiimarnock, and Ardressan—March 2 Glasgow, Paidoy, and Greenock (Bridge of Weir Branch)—March 23 Glasgow, Paisley, and Graliotk (Harbour Branch) — March 2 Glasgow, Paisley, and Greenock (t'olloc and Govan Branch)—March 2 Gl as gow, PaiAley, Kilmarnock, and Ayr Amendment and Bran ;has—Feb. 23 Glasgow, Paidiy, Kilmarnock, and Ayr Amendment and Branches—Feb. 23 Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock, and Ayr Amendment and Branches—Feb. 23 Glasgow Southern Terminal—March 26 Glasgow, Strathaven, and Lesmabagow Direct— March 23 Gloucester and Dean Forest—Feb. 26 Grand Junction (Anyton and Aston and other Branche,) F,..1 ) . 17 Grand Junction (ilayton.!ind Warrington Branch) Feb. 16 Grand Trunk or Staff.rd aim% Peterborough Union— March 13 Grand Union—March 17 Clravi-send anti Kock:ester P.Ailway and rorchase)-I‘.l::rch 9 and e° 4l ' , l (.ale G re „ Grimsby and Sheffield Jane ion Extension (No Great Gr:msby and Sht.ffiuld Junction Extenni n (No 21)—Ma'e,l' 9 Great GritnslV and Shall:4d Junction Extension (No. 3)—Feb. 27 Great Grimsby anti SheffiAd Junction Railway and Grimsby Dock Consoliett:tion — Marcb 3 Great Grimsby and t3heffield Junction (Humber Ferries)— March 3. Great Grimsby. Louth, Horneastlo, Lincoln, and Mid land Junction—March 23 Great North of England (Purchas.e)—Feb. 24. Great North of England (!;dale Branch).--Yeb. 24 Great North of England and Boroughbridge Branch— Feb. 2-1 Great North of Scotland—March 2 • Great North-of Scotland Eastern Extension—March 4 Great Western and Wycombe—March 2 Great Western and Uxbridge—March 2 Guildf:3ri, Chichester, and Portsmouth—March 23 Halesworth and Norwich, April G Harwich and F,a3t. - rn Counties Junction (Railway and Pier) —Feb. 27 Hertford and Hatfield—Zylarch 4. Horbury Bridge and Calder—March 30 Huddersfi,ld and Manchester Riilway and Canal (Bradford Branch)—Feb. 27 Huddersfield and Manchester Railway and Canal (Huddersfield Diversion and Cooper Bridge R - anch) March 2 Huddersfield and Manches'rr Railway and Canal (Oldham Branch)—March Huddersfield and Sheffield and Manchester and Leeds • Railway Companies Amalgamation—March 9 _Huddersfield and Sheffield Junction (Darti , Id Branch) —April 2 Hall and Barnsley Junction Hull and Lincoln Direct—April 6 Mill and Selby (Pure!aase)—Feb. 25 Inverness and Elgin Junction—Aril 6 Ipss‘ • and Bury St. Edmunds (Norwich Exter • own ) Kent Atmospheric--March 5 Kilmarnock and Ayr Direct—April 1 Kilmaraook and Troon—April 3 KinrosiNfrinetioli - "ition . 2 " irkintifloch and Kilsyth—Ftb. 18 Lancashire awl Neigh Takshire../Ivaii 13 Lancashire and Yorksbire North-Eastern—Feb. 23 Laribaster and Carlisle (Es tension. to Caledonian Rail way), and Lancaster and Preston Junction Railways (Amalgamation)—Feb. 17 Leeds and Bradford (Alteration of Levels in Bingley) —Feb. 13 Leeds and Bradford (Junction Line at Bradford) — Feb. 28 Leeds and Thirsk (St. Helen's Branch)—March 25 Leeds and Thirslc, North-Eastern Extension (Wath to Ha,rtli4oOl)—April 8 Leeds i ond Thirsk (Knaresborough Branch Extension) —Mardh 30 Leeds ar.d York—March 4 Leeds Central—April 3 Leeds, Dewsbury, and Manchester (Deviations and Branches)—Feb. 17 Leeds, Dewsbury, and Manchester (Wakefield Exten sion)—Feb. 25 Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland Junction—March 13 Leeds, York, and Midland Junction—March 16 Leicester and Bedford—March 11 Leicester and Birmingham (with a Branch)—March 25 L?ieester and Tamworih Junction—March 6 Dalserf, and Coatbridge Mineral Junc tion—April 8 Liverpool and Bury, and Manchester and Leeds Rail ways Atnalgamation—March 9 Liverpool and Preston and Manchester and Southport —March 13 Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle-upon-Tyne Junction—Feb. 18 Livi•rpo .1, Ormskirk, and Preston—Feb. 16 Llyr.vi Val'ey and South Wales Junctior—March 4 London and Birmingham Railway and Birmingham Canal Are 9 London and Birmingham (Aylesbury Railway Pur chase)—March 25 Lee 4 and Birmingham (Birmingham Extension) — M. reh 27 Lond.in and B;rmingliam (Camden and Euston Station E.l;artlement) —Feb. 27 &union AIM Birinihaliam, Grand Junction, 11,1anchi. ter. pind Birmindlato Railway - Companies Am tlgamati.n —II ,rch 25 London and Birmingham (Leaminton Extension and Coventry and Rugby Stations Enlargement)—March 25 London and Birmingham (Newport Pagnell Branch) b. 23 Lend , n and Birmingham (St. Alban's and Lutcn Branch)—Feb. 23 London and Blackwall—Feb. 27 London and Brighton and London and Croydon Con solidation—March 6 London and Brighton (Dorking Branch)—Feb. 20 London and Brighton (East Grinstead Branch) — Feb. 19 London and Brighton (Wandsworth Branch)—Feb. 18 London and Croydon—(Thames Junction Branch) — Feb. 23 London and Oxford—March 6 London and South Essex—Feb. 27 London and SoUth-Western Railway Acts Amend ment—March 13 London and South-Western (Chertsey and Egham Branch)—Feb. 16 London and South-Western (Epping Branch)—Feb. 16 London and South-Western (Farnham and Alton Branch)—Feb. 19 London and South-Western (Hampton Court Branch) —Feb. 16 London and South-Western (London-bridge Exen sion)—Feb. 16 London and South-Western (Ramsey and Redbridge Junction)—Feb. 25 London and Windsor—April 6 London, Bristol, and South Wales Direct —March 13 London, Hounslow, and Western —Feb. 25 London, Newbury, and Bath Direct —March 2 London, Salisbury, and Yeovil Junction (Salisbury to Yeovil) London, Salisbury, and Yeovil Junction (Basingstoke to Yeovil)--March 19. Lowestoft and Beccles Maldon, Witham, and Braintree—Feb. 27 Malton and Driffield Junction—Feb. 24 Manchester and Birmingham—Feb. 16 Manchester and Birmingham Continuation and Welsh Junction—March 13 Manchester and Hyde—March 17 Manchester and Leeds (Railway Extensions, &c.) — March 13 Manchester and Leeds and Leeds and Bradford Rail ways Amalgamation—March 20 Manchester and Poole (Luggershall, Salisbury, and Poole)—March 17 Manchester and Southampton—March 20 Manchester and Bury Canal Navigation and Railway, and Manchester and Leeds Railway Amalgamation-- April 8 Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midland Junction —Feb. 20 Manchester, Huddersfied, and Great arimsby Direct —March 11 Manchester, Sheffield, and Midland Junction— Feb. 19 Midlani and Eistern Counties (Cambridge to Wee don)—March 4 Midland, Barnsley, Sheffield, Dewsbury, Leeds, and Bradford—March 27 Midland (Birmingham Extension)—March 25 Midland (Burton-upon-Trent to Nuneaton Branch and Ashby Canal purchase)—March 23 Midland (Darfteld to Els , _'car and other Branches) — March 25 Midland (Erewash Valley, Branches)—March 27 Midland (Erewash Exiasion)—March 27 Midland (Leicester and Swanning Alteration and Branches)—March 23 Midland Railway (Purchase of Oakham Canal)— March 23 Midland (Syston to Peterborough)—Feb. 23 Mitcham and South-Western—March 9 Mold Junction—Feb. 20 Monkland and Kirkintillock—March G Monkland and Kirkintillock (Chapel Hall Branch) — Feb. 25 inipouth and Hereford—March 6 unmouthshire—March 9 orecombe (Harbour and Railway)—March 24 Newcastle anti Berwick—Feb. 17 Newcastlet-and Darlington Junction and Tyne Dock —March 2-' Newcastle and Darlington Junction (Durham and Sunderland and Wearmouth Dock Purchase and Branches)—Feb. 18 Newcastle and Darlington Junction Railway (Pontop and South Shields Railway Purchase)—March 18 Newcastle and Darlington Junction (Thirsk and Mal ton Branches)—Feb. 17 Newcastle-upon-Tyne and Carlisle Branch—March 2 Newmarket and Chesterford—March 4 Newport, Abergavenny, and Hereford—April 8 Norfolk Extension (Dereham, Wells,. and Blakeney Branch)—Feb. 23 Norfolk Extension (Stowmarket, Wymondham, and Attleborough Branch)—March 13 Norfolk (Norwich Branch)—April 3 North and South Junction—Feb. 20 North British—Feb. 23 North British (Hawick Branches)—Feb. 23 North 13riti-h (Carl'sle Extension)—Feb. 23 North British (Gretna Branch)—lcb. 23 North Kent—Feb. 16 North Kent (City Extension)—Feb. 16 North of Norfolk— March 27 North Staffordshire (Churnct Valley Line)—Ftb. 16 North Statfurd-hire(Harecastle to Sandbach)—Feb.l6 North Staffordshire (Potteries Line)—Mareh 13 North Union—Feb. 17 North Wales—April I North Wales Mineral (DaviAion and Branches)-- March 2 North-Western—Feb. 23 Northumberland and Lancashire Junction— March 30 Nottingham, Mansfield, and Midlauds Junctiou— March 18 Oldham District—Feb. 26 Perth an - 1 Crieff District—Feb. 23 Perth and Inverness—March 30 Podooand Govan and Clydesdale Junction Railways Amalgtations—Niarch 23 Brand Wyre Harbour and Dock Company (Lqh JUnction)—April 3 _ _ _ • Preston and Wyro Railway Harbour and Dock Com pany (New Deck and Railway)—April 3 }feuding, Guildford, and Reigate—March 27 litb:rhy and Huntingdon—March 9 Rugby and Stauttbrd—Ft-h. 27 Rog by, Le3n3ic7„ton, and Warwick—March 6 - Runcorn an , l Preqt..n Bro. k —Di irch 17 Richmond Branch)—March 4 St. Alh4n's, Luton, aryl Dunstable —March 1 27 (Canal and Railwav)--VVr2lt Scottish Central ( Branch) —N(at . ch 23 . Central il ((ileernunlyTßerrainnicnti)s—titNitiu.,rncsh)fma. mil 23 Scottich Central (Cricfr Branch) —March 23 S SZt ts t t. i s slt h u r h e teh h s) 2_ l 6 nl(l; sSs:o(o)tttittiiiihh,a Nill4),liiiddidllaa,naldjEuxjnteuetnniocaritl Scottish Grand Junction —March 3 h lar o ch f 2 verth Junction l a s n o a c Branch)—March 2 Scottish Southern—April a Sheffield, Ashton-under-Lyne and Manchester Rail way Company, &c., Amalgamation—March 24. Sheffield, Ashton-under-Lyne, and Manchester (earns ley Brareh)—Feb. 27. Sheffield, Ashton-under-Lyne, and Manchester (Won. bortoighßranch)—March 25. ShetUd. Ashton-under-Lyne, and Manchester (Du kinflehl, Worsborcugh, and Glossop Branches, and Shef. field Station)—Fb. 27 Sheffield, Ashtnnttunder-Lyne Railway, Peak Forest, and Macclesfield Canal Purchases--March 2 Si: offi:dd, Buxton, Leek, Potteries, and Crewe—April 6 Sheffield, Rotherham, Barnsley, Wakefield, Hudders field, and Goole—Feb. 13 Shrewsbury and Eirmingham—March 27 Shrewsbury and Herefordshire—March 30 Shrewsbury, Oswastry, and Chester Junction (Crick , heath and Went Lines) —March 2 Shrewsbury, Oswestry, and Chester Junction (Extent. sion and Deviatiens)—March 2 Shr: wt,bury, Oswestry, and Chester Junction and North Wales Mineral Railway Companies Amalgama tion—March 13 Shrewsbury, Wolverhampton, and South Staffordshire Juic:ion-114.r , 1 26 Sh ws! , urv. lolverhampton, and South Staffordshire Jurc.io:l(CJalbrook Dale Branch)—March 26 Shrops: - drJ C anal(Chester and Wolverhampton Line)—Ftb. 27 Shropshire Union Canal (Newtown to Crewe with Branches) —Felt. 27 Shropshire Unt , :rt 1 tila•ays anti Caual (Shrew bury and Stafi . „3.(l)—Match I 1 Slatnannan and Borrowstoune,is—reb. 23 Sksrnannan (Balltgate and Jaweraig Branches) — Feb. 23 Sontereetshire Midland—March 18 SAitla Lute:a (Canterbury to P`Mr>."l k. 23. South Eastern (Ashford Stations Enlargement)— March 6 South Eastern (Branch from Reigate to Dorking)— Feb. 23 South-Eastern (Chislet to Margate)—Feb 23 South-Eastern (Godstone Station to East Grinstead— Feb. 23 South-Eastern (Greenwich to Chart, near Ashford, with Branches to Tunbridge and Riverhead)—Feb. 18 South-Eastern (Greenwich to Chilham, near Canter bury, with Branches to Sheerness and Faversham Creek) —Feb. 18 South-Eastern (Maidstone to Strood, near Rochester: —Feb. 23 South-Eastern (Rye to Rye Harbour)—Feb. 23 South-Easteru (Waterloo-road to Greenwich)—Feb. 18 South Midland (Huntingdon Branch)—Feb. 23 South Midland (Northampton and Bedford Lines) — Feb. 23 South Stafford,hire Junction, with Branches—April 8 South Staffordshire Junction (Bilston and Priestfield Branch)—April 8 South Stafford (Showhill and Portabello Branch— April 8 South Staffordshire (Willenhall and Bloxwich Branch) —April 8 South Wales (No. 2)—March 23 Staines and Richmond Junction—Feb. 16 Stamford and Spalding—March 11 Stirling and Dumfermline—Feb. 20 Stirlingshire Midland Junction—March 23 Strathsay and Bredalbanu—Mhrch 23 Surrey Grand J unct i on — April 8 Surrey Iri•in (Company Di sso l v i ng )—M arch 26 SAa!iea Vale—Feb. 25 Taff Vale—March 17 Tenby, Saundersf "or, and South Wales—Feb. 27 Trent Valley (Alrewas Branch)— March 13 Tring, Reading, and Basingstoke (Tring to Saunder ' ton)—March 16 Ulverston.., Furness, and Lancaster and Carlisle— Feb 25 Vale of Neath—A pel 8 Wak, Pont. ract, and Goole (Methley, Askern, and 0 ikerishaw)—Feb. 13 Wakefield, Pontefract, and Goole Railway and Port, &c. of Goole—March 6 Wavenev Valley and Great Yarmouth—Feb. 27 Wear Dock—March 13 11 est London Railway Improvement and Extension— March 27 West of Scotland Junction—Feb. 23 Whitehaven and Furness Junction (WhitPhaven Ex tension and Kirksanton Deviation—March 17 Coltness (Bathgate Branch)—Feb. 27 Wilsontown, Murningside, and C.ltness (Caledonian Junction)—Feb. 27 Wilsontown, Morninm,ide, and Coltness (Improve ment and Branches)—Feb. 23 Wilsontown, Morningside, and Coltness (Knowton Branch)—Feb. 23. Windsor, Slough, and Staines Atmospheric—Feb. 20 Wisbech, St. Ives, and Cambridge Junction—Feb. 19 Wishaw and Coltness (Greenhill Branch)—March 20 Worcester and Porthdynllaen—March 27 York and Carlisle—Feb. 25 York and North Midland (East Riding Branches— No. I)—Feb. 18 York and North Midland (East Riding Branches— No. 2)—Feb. 24 York and North Midland (Leeds Extension)—Feb. 18 York and North Midland (Whitby and Pickering Extension)—Feb. 16 York and North Midland (Widening and Enlarge ment)—Feb. 18 Yorkshire and Glasgow Union—March 5. BILLS READ A THIRD TIME. Brighton and Chichester (Steyning Branch)—Mar. 30 Brighton, Lewes, and Hastings (Deviations and Branches), March 30 Direct London and Portsmouth—March 13 Eastern Union and Hadleigh Junction—April 6 Great Western—April 2 London and York—March 13 Sheffield and Lincolnshire Junction—March 13 South-Eastern (Tunbridge Wells to Hastings and Rye)—March 30 The following list includes those Bills that have been read a first time, and those which have been with drawn : Axholme, Gainsborough, Goole, and York and North Midland Junction—Feb. 4 Ayrshire and Caledonian Junction—Feb. 6 Brecon and Merthyr Tydfil Junction—(withdrawn) Cork, Bandon, and Kinsale—(withdrawn) Eastern Counties, Cambridge and Lincoln—(with drawn) Eastern Counties, Hertford to Huntingdon—(with draw) Eastern Counties, Lincoln and Milford—(withdraw) Eastern Counties, March and Lincoln Extension— (withdrawn) Edinburgh, Leith and Granton (Extension and Branches)—April 8 Forth and Clyde Junction—(April 8) Great North and South Wales—Feb. 25 (withdrawn) Ipswich and &try St. Edmunds (extension to Ely with a Branch therefrom)—April 6 Launceston and South Devon (No. 1) withdrawn, (No. 2) presented Leeds and Bradford (Guisely Branch) (withdrawn) Liverpool and Leeds Direct (withdrawn) London Knd Birmingham (Weedon Branch)—April 6 Midland (Claycross to Newark)—April 7 North Union (Harwich Branch)—March 9 Oldham, Manchester, Liverpool, and Birkenhead Junction—April 6 Oxford, Worcesier, and Wolverhampton—April 6 Potbury (Pier and Railway)—April 6 Preston and Wyre Extension and Darwen Tunction (withdrawn) Rochdale Canal, and Manchester and Leeds (with drawn) _ _ Scottish Central and Caledonian Junction—April 6 Sheffield, Ashton-under-Lyne, and Manchester (Sta ley-bridge and Hayfield Branches—April 6 South Devon (Tavistock and other Branches) (with drawn) South Devon Amendment and Branches (No. 2) — April Taw Vale Extension—Feb. 16 Tean and Dove Valley, and Eutern and Western Junction (withdrawn) West Cornwall—Apt il 3 Wilts, Somerset, and Weymouth—April 7. METALLURGIC INDUSTRY OF AUSTRIA. (From the Alining Journal.) The mineral resources of Austria are but very little known in this country, although the Austrian empire is very rich in minerals of every description. The greater portion of the metal, the fossil fuel, salt, earth, or clay, for the manufacture of porcelain and the other potteries, pyrites, nickel ore, cobalt, grenates, &c., form, by their union, an extensive list of minerals, rarely to be found in any other country. The following is an official return of the principal metals produced in 1845, namely;_. Iron and cast metal lb. 306,000,000 Lead and lead productions 16,000,000 Copper Zinc Antimony Mercury 370,000 Productions from co b a lt an d nickel 240,000 Tin 190,000 Silvers . • 56,000 Gold Austria also possesses very extensive coal beds, but the working of th em h as not yet b een carried to any ex tent, although there is a great abundance of wood, and at low prices. At the List exposition about fifty of the exhibitors sent to Vienna numerous supplies of coal, anthracite, and lignite. The proluction of coal in Austria during the last few years is estimated at 600,000 tons, which will, no doubt, rapidly increase. It is well known that in Austria the working of mines of every description is a prerogative of the state, which some times, under particular circumstances, cedes its regal right to private individuals. All the provinces of the Austrian monarchy, with the exception of the provinces of Venice, Meng the coast, and Dalmatia, are productive of Leon, and we can divide into three large zones the countries which furnish this metal. The most im portant of these tor iron, as for the quality of its metal lurgic productions, is Styria, as it furnishes annually 336,000 cats. of iron. According to the statistical returns of the iron industry in Austria, it appears that in 1341 there were 226 high furnaces throughout the empire, 32 furnaces at Kupul (Kupolosen). 835 forges for iron and steel, with 1,955 fires, and 1,538 hammers or anvils, 15 puddling forges, wsth e 4 puddling ovens, 38 flattening apparatuses. and 32 retseatine ovens, 40 flattening machines, with 112 pairs of cylinders, 94 reheating ovens, 9 steel melting ovens, and 31 mechanical establishments. The produce was as follows;—Rough metal (roheiseu), 2,192,540 Austrian cwts.; cast metal, 3 64,130; iron in bars, 1 ,375,659—0 f which 182,459 were flattened iron ; tin, 11,056; iro!.. plates, 111,644; and steel, 209,379. In 1843 the pvoduetion of east metal was 9,351,980 owls.; and moulsied metal, 369,342 ewts. The total production of cast iron, or metal, is estimated at 14,000,000 florins (2s. 3d. sterling); and the whole produce of the iron industry is sated at 39,000,000 florins. Although the production of iron in Austria presents each year a considerable increase, it is far from being in proportion, according to the abundance of iron are of excellent quality, which is found in nearly every provir.ce of the empire. The admission of iron into Austria, like many other products, is only permitted under especial permission ; therefore, the imports of it in 1841 amounted only to the value of 400,000 florins. The value of productions exported was 4,500,000 florins. The chief trade of iron in Austria is c arr i e d on w i th the states of the Zollverein, ia i nn t s ye s yn c el y or • scythes e p s aacr a tti n lo, ti ef uloituer,aal and d twinstruments o he ul n o steelsa doubt 00 uo soughtcost notwithstandingagricultural afomr; transactions, if the Custom-house system of Austria did not throw an obstacle in the way. The manufacture of scythes and sickles is one of the most remarkable and ancient inclusti ies of Austria. Styria, the classical land of scythes, has for a long time supplied nearly all the markets of the world ; and, although the fabrication of them has greatly progressed iu othe r countries, parti cularly in France, Prussia, and Russia, the production of them in Austria has not at all diteinisl led. The follow lug is the number made.-3,965,000 cythes of different sizes, 1,159,000 sickles, and 83,000 1 , .nines, or shares for cutting straw—the weight of thee' s implements being 83,226 ewte. ; value 2,200,000 flor ins. There are no less then 1 7 cu 5 in ITN h scythes are made without i , establish ment can only make a limited nueel .er of them —must ldingthose establishments, ot ' lliinga2 v. Each only have four fires, the first of whi - i 1 serves to purify the iron and steel ; the second for 'tor a fling the scythe by a large anvil, which is worked gesise 117 by a hydrauli c wheel • Ilia third to work it small hammer , the . make t hel ridge, and mountir,g it ; and the last one 'to gist; it the tewper roquirc4, , owg eggblighaeafor it • can by law only make fifty tons of scythes per annum, each ton containing from 1,000 to 1,800 different pieces, according to their size. They, however, can double this quantity, by having two brigades, or change of workmen, and by adopting in their work more methodical order. They attach a great importance to executing the work in each shop in the same manner, and by the same work men. The Austrians complain very much of the manu facturers of Prussia, who make inferior scythes, and adopt the best marks of Styria, causing a great injury to that part of the country. The above will show the progress making in mining industry in that rich country, which promises, in a few years, to be a most prosperous resource. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, April 20. The SPEAKER took the Chair at Four o'clock, when there not being Forty Members present, the House was adjourned. LAW INTELLIGENCE, ROLL'S COURT, April 20. AR3ISTRONO V. STORER. Lord LANGDALE, in delivering judgment on the petitions in this case, which was tried last March, said, it appeared by an order, dated the 12th of January, 1841, ma d e w i th respect to the petition of James Grant, now deceased, the receiver of the rents of the estate, as well as the plantations in Jamaica. There had been a reference, to ascertain if Grant had any lien on the 3,6541., the balance which was due to the receiver, Mr. Williams, who had committed an excess in the payment of his account. It was found by the Master that Williams had a lien und er a deed bearing date August, 1845, which had been entered into by him with Grant, Theodore Williams, and Baragletti deceased, and under whom the present Baraglette, the representative of his father claimed That lien had been assigned to Barag lette for a sum of 1,7001., which was paid to the representatives of Joseph Storer Williams. The Master found that, under the agreement between Grant and Theodore Wil liams, Baraglette ht.d the lien far 3,6541. 25., the principal, and for 1,8591. 12s. 21. i n t erest. The report was net excepted to, an d was confirmed. Mrs. Aim Catherine Storer, th widow, had obtained leave to present a petition against the report, which she ac;ordingly did. The report also prayed fur a reference to review the same, upon two grounds, namely, that the Master was not autho rised to do more than simply to report on the alleged claim Elf Grant, and also that his decision on the claim of Baz,lg:!tte was made without authority, and that liazalgette having filed bills on behalf of the testator, Anthony Gilbert Storer, could not be allowed to enter into any compromise with Williams's executor tor his own benefit, but for the common beneit of all the creditors. As there had been no exceptions taken to the report, no questions whatever raised upon it, and no excuse offered for the matter not having been brought before the Court in a proper manner, and that it was not even pre tended that there was any error in fact or law committed by the Master, these objections could have no weight whatever. The petition set forth that the profit coming to Bazalgette was gratuitous, whi c h assert i on was unfounde. Bazalgette filed the second bill, which was a bill of review. If it had been shown in a proper manner that Bazalgette was bound to protect the interests of the creditors, and that he failed in his duty, there might then have been grounds for the appli cation. But the petition did not allege that Grant was not entitled to what he had obtained. The petition must, there , fore, be dismissed with costs. The case was directed to be spoken to on Saturday. NELSON V. DUNMIRE. His LORDSHIP gave judgment in this cause, and went in extenso through the details. It appeared that the plaintiff Nelson was the residuary legatee of Mrs. E. Nelson, for whom Duncombe acted as personal representative. Mrs. Nelson had appointed Mr. Nelson as her sole agent, but subsequently, in a codicil to her will, she joined Duncombe with him in the executor ship. Duncombe administered to the estate, and was pre pared to settle with Nelson, claiming, however, the ex penses at which he bad been for sustaining the plea of unsound mind, and in obtaining the commission of lunacy. Mr. Nelson objected to this, and filed a bill. after which Mr. Duncombe filed a cross bill. The alleged lunacy was not sustained. His Lordship here went into all the circumstances of the case, which have appeared before the public, and decided upon granting the reference to the Master to ascertain the state of mind of the plaintiff; and to make a report with respect to the expenses incurred. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, April 20. (Sittings in Banco.) TILE QUEEN V. PARKER. Mr. Sergeant SHEA moved for a rule to set aside the ver dict in this case. The case was tried before Lord Denman at the sittings after last term at Guildhall, and a verdict re turned for the Crown. Sergeant Shea now moved upon affidavits. Lord DEN MAN intimated that it had better be brought on when the defendant was brought up for judgment. In the case of THE QUEEN' V. LEWIS, the same course was directed by the Court. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, April 20. (Sittings of Banco.) FINLATSON V. PILBROW. Mr. CHAMBERS moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict for the plaintiff should not be set aside and a new trial be had on the ground of misdirection by the Learned jury. The who, in f ac t, gave no di rec ti o n at all to the The case was tried before Lord Chief Justice Denman, at the late assizes at Maidstone, and was brought by plaintiff, a railway surveyor, for the recovery of 44/. 17s. 6d„ for services rendered by him 'to the defendant, Mr. Pilbrow, of atmospheric railway celebrity, on the projected London and Gravesend Atmospheric Railway, now defunct. According to the statement of counsel the evidence in support of the action consisted of the prospectus of the Company and two witnesses who deposed to the fact of the engagement having taken pine and the reasonableness of the charges. The Learned Counsel commented upon the evidence at great length, and contended that it was totally inadequate to connect defendant with the engagement, and that as one of the witnesses was not a secretary or clerk, as he had represented himself, but a mes senger, in the employment of plaintiff, who paid him occa sionally from 2s. to a guinea for the services he rendered, his testimony was worth nothing. The COURT was of opinion that the whole was a qaestion of fact, and as the Learned Judge and the jury who tried the case were of opinion that defendant was liable, under such circumstances the motion for a new trial could not be granted.—Rule refused. HUTCHINSON V. EAST LANCASHIRE RAILWAY COMPANY. Mr. KNOWLES moved for a rule t o s h ow cause why the verdict for defendants in this case should not be set aside and i f ve d rP eb e t ° , brought to re cover certain penalties forfeited by defendants f or a b reach of cer tainl' before Mr. Justice Coleridge, tried r a new trial had, on the ground ,of mi s di rect i on. The case i,igo, a ta and ae waslate ali assizes actionat Lo provisions of the Jl.ct . empowering t h em to construct their railway. The plaintiff was the owner of certain land which the Company . required for the purposes of the rail way , • and the question of compensation was submitted to a jury who assessed damages. The defendants paid that amount into the Bank of England, and then proceeded to take possession of the land. The plaintiff subsequently brought his action for ejectment, and obtained a verdict. Mr. Justice Cresswell, before whom th e case was tried, ruling it in favour of the plaintiff, on the ground that defendant had not complied with the terms of the Act in not paying the money over to plaintiff. A motion was afterwards made in this Court for a rule to set aside that verdict, but it was refused, as the Court agreed withlSfr. Justi ce C resswe ll i n the view he had taken. The action tried at the Liverpool assizes was for the recovery of damages forfeited by the Company for entering, without consent, into plaintiff's lands, for doing which, according to the 159th section of their own Act, they forfeited 25/. a-day for every d ay t h ey kept pos session of the land after notice was se rve d upon them to give up possession. The verdict was then given for de fendant, which the Learned Counsel proceeded at great length to contend was at variance with the 159th sec ti on of the Act for the construction of the railway. The COURT was of opinion that no such construction as that given by the Learned Counsel could be put on the section, but would confer with the Judge who tried the cause. LORD MAYOR'S COURT, Aprii 20 (Before the RECORDER.) THE CHAMBERLAIN OF LONDON v. STURT AND OTHERS. (Continued crone our Afternoon Edition of yesterday.) After some discussion it was ultimately decided that the Solicitor-General might if he chose address his Lordship. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL accordingly proceeded to answer the objection of his Learned Friend, who he said must not suppose that because he happened in this case to appear as counsel for the City of London he had it in his power to stop every one's mouth that might appear against the interests for which he appeared. (Laughter.) He ( the Solicitor-General) appeared there as Counsel for one of her Majesty's subjects, and as an interlocatory question had arisen in these proceedings, he presumed that he had a perfect right to address his Lordship upon it, who, he hoped; would treat this subject with the seriousness and attention which it deserved. He had no wish whatever to occupy unnecessarily the time of the Court, because he happened to be concerned in cases which demanded his presence else where at that moment. Wh it was the allegation which he had submitted on behalf of the defendants in this case ? That the array has made by Charles Sewell and that in stead of the complete list ofjurors liable to serve on this occa sion, only 48 had been returned; andat was from that paper and that paper alone which lay before the gentle man that occupied the seat underneath his Lordship, that Sewell or his deputy had returned the jurors who hail been called into the box. lie wished 'o ask, if the paper which had been produced was not the array, which was the array? If th it paper had n t been produced before the Court, there would have been no other Mitt ument. The second objection to the array was, that it was made by a particular individual who was interested in the issue of the trial. Now, if the paper before his Lordship was not the array, there was, in fact, no array at all. L was fr , in that paper that the jurors had been called, and in all ordinary cases that was termed the array. He apprehended that the question whether the officer , the sergeantsat-Ni ece, had me le the array or not was per ' fectly immaterial. The officer received the list of 150 parties liable to serve in ordinary cases, but as the number was so great he reduced them to 60, which 60 constituted the su . me that Sewell array, and in the selection of those 60 individuals he was at perfect liberty to exercise his discretion. if he saw any that the list, iu s case, o was the parties amongst the 150 parties liable to serve who might be favourable to that party against whom he entertainedld some dislike, he might refuse to select them. t At o as in the present case he (the Solicitor-General) had aright hadhe names returned having jurors prejudicial this case, had an interest in the result of the action, to that of his clients. And he must not be told been th party chosenwbhs: lessen into ab II tt' b itenough for his a o mg- ox ;was (tile Solicit by h or - General' s ) purpose t h at S ewe ll was the party v otn the list had been returned, and he contended that the party returning the panel ought to have been an unindifferent In delegating to which he submitted Mr. Sewell was not. egating to the Sergeant -at-Mace. cant -at-Mace. the power of selection snowed that h e was an • t officer of the Corpora tion of London, becauseuniu d'ff re e n enabled to choose a small out of a large he was number of jurors. That officer had held his office sixty years, and had no doubt discharged his duties in a proper manner, but that was not the question. The ques tion was not whether this officer conducted himself in a proper manner, but whether he was an indifferent or unindifferent officer of the Corporation. He know that he was the person entrusted with the list, that he reduced it, and that he made the selection, and conse quently the array, sometim es f or o ne cause and sometimes for anoth er . At any rate it was this officer who made a list front the large list which contained this panel. Thus the Ser g e ant - at-place had the power to omit the names of par-. tie s who might entertain Peculiar views and might give a desired decision. It was enou ,, h to say that he had the power, 'whether It properly or not. He might either rejset or retain a considerable number. The question then . vias,_ whet( r he was unindifferent or not. He submitted that. le he was not unindifferent, 41114 tiiereforoVast the Pau volt aside, juaamurdll " musts e Charles Sewell, the Sergeant -at-Mace, was a freeman of the City. Sir Tnoßras - WanE was - astonished- that his -Learned Friend should have devoted his talents to argue in the way he had done. It was perfectly evident that the piece of parch ment which his Learned Friend had christened a panel was a legitimate instrument. It was returned by the proper officer, and contained the names of forty-eight persons, forty four of whom were summoned. He had only to summon those on the list, and had no authority to make it a panel. The panel was made by the wardmote, and the officer had no power over it. He, therefore, submitted that the objection was not tenable. The RECORDER then proceeded to give his decision on the point. He said the issue was that Charles Sewell made the array. Now he was of opinion that the jury list was made at the inquest during the wardmote from the list presented by the inquest jury, and that the duty of the officer was in that respect ministerial only, and that omission to furnish the names of four persons who had moved out of the ward, and whom he consequently was unable to summons, could not vitiate the only array—namely, that presented by the in quest at the wardmote. He did not think he was anything more than a summoning officer, limited to the array. That was the object of the presentment of the inquest; and if they were to enter into the history of the practice, they would find that it was of the most popular description. It was comprehended in every presentment to every ward mote that a return should be made by the inquests of all those who were liable to serve on ju ries within each wardmote, and the entire City constituted a large aggregate number of wardmotes. Of this process they had a return of the inquest from all persons throughout the City who were liable to serve as jurors in the City. Then came the Act of the Common Council, which directed (the number being far greater than was required for the City Courts), that they should take in rotation a return of two wards fur each month throughout the year ; and as there were more wards in the City than m mths iu the year, it frequently occurred that t ev had three wards in some particular month. Eve wardmote contained within it a court leet, at which sue proper officer presided to see it rightly done, but almost everything was dune by the public, empanelled as a jury. It wss a most ancient and popular institution, and what were they charged with? With having resorted, according to ancient oust' m and by the law of the city, to a most popular mode to arrive at the names of persons liable to serve as jurors; thus, instead of being referred to the nomination of one officer, they had the coilscrive inquests of the City re turning from their respective wards those liable to serve as jurors. The duty of Sewell's deputy was simply ministerial. The only defect was this, that be had not signified in the list which he returned the names of those whom he was unable to find. He was, therefore, of opi nion that the array was not made by the Sergeant at-Mace, but by those who elected the jars?. The objection, therefore, was not, in his opinion, tenab'e. The Recorder must insist upon his right to be rererreu to as fryer and not as Recorder; and he would put the matter in any way whi,:h should not inculpate his successor, but he could not sign the bill of exceptions in his character of Recorder. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL then handed in a challenge of the array, on the ground of unindifference in the Sheriff, Al dermen, and the other members of the Corporation, and cer tain of the instruments of making the array. Sir T. WILDE objected to the challenge on the ground that all the challenges could not be taken at once, on the ground that the precedents of the books were decided on that point. The SOLICITOR GENERAL must ask for his Learned Friend's authority, for it really appeared to hit that the terms of the decision were, that all challenges should be taken at the same time; that is, that the challenges must be made not as one challerge, but that all should be taken before the other party proceeded. The RECORDER conceived that the challenges were to be taken in succession like a number of counts, for if one suc ceeded that was sufficient to destroy the array. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that the points of the chal lenges were under different issues. The RECORDER conceived that although the whole of the challenges had not been put in upon parchment, yet that they were to be considered as so many different challenges. But they must consider the confusion on the record. Sir T. WILDE was of opinion that although the pointe of challenge might be different, yet the whole of the reasons ought to be stated on the same paper. After a little interruption the SOLICITOR-GENERAL re sumed, and stated that he had challenged the array on the ground of several individuals acting from indifferency, and if he succeeded on one, that was sufficient, and it was certainly new to him to find that because the parties were different, the cause being the same that he was to be precluded from his challenge, and he apprehended that some sufficient authority ought to be given instead of the vague intimation, and if his Lordship gave any erroneous intimation he slu,uld be entitled to an amendment in the writ of error. The RECOREEE—Then I will take the matter in this way. I will take the parchment as diverse challenges, but not on double challenges. Sir T. WILDE said that his Learned Friend had stated that if a second challenge would not be allowed he would be taken by surprise, but ho very much doubted whether he had not a long consultation with those who he had instructed him, as to which of his two challenges against the officer who made up the array and the party themselves he should submit first. His Learned Friend had also stated, with his characteristic courage, that he had not quoted any authority in support of his opinion, that the defendant could not now put in another challenge. He had quoted the authority of no less a personage than Lord Coke (than whom a higher authority could not be quoted), who stated, that " if an adversary wished to make any challeages, he must make them all at once." And if that meant any thing, it meant that he was precluded from putting in chal lenges in succession, and he submitted that although those challenges might be tried in succession, yet that they must all be laid before the Court at one and the same time. It was ridiculous for his Learned Friend to say that he was surprised by the objection which he (Sir T. Wilde) had made against the second challenge, because when he informed him at the outset that he would not be permitted to make a second challenge, his reply wa , , "Oh ! we shall see about that afterwards." which showed that he feared he should be unsuccessful in his second attempt to interrupt the progress of the trial, and that he could not therefore be now surprised at the objection taken against the challenge. It was plain that his Learned Friend wished to have as many strings to his bow as he possibly could. The language of Lord Coke was clear, and decidedly against the course pro posed to be taken by his Learned Friend, and he therefore trusted that his Lordship would not sanction it. The RECORDER sail that it was perfectly conclusive to his mind that the passage quoted from Lord Coke was against the Learned Solicitor-General, but he was disposed to admit the challenge, although he had no right whatever to make it. The challenge and the return of the inquest having ;been handed in, the Recorder deliberated, and Sir. T. WILDE stated that a serious question arose as to the interference with the law of the wardmotes. The RECORDER conceived that the question would hinge on the way in which the juries were removed. Sir T. WILDE thought that that question was already dis posed of, and the only question was, whether the further consideration should come on in the way of challenge or de murrer. The SOUCITOR-GENERAL conceived that the right of chal lenge had been substantiated, and after considerable delibera tion it was decided that the cause should be adjourned till Monday next at ten o'clock, the right of challenge being left to the Solicitor-General, with a power on the behalf of the plaintiffs to question the extent to which it was exercised, the understanding being that the exceptions should be several, but confined under one statement. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MARYLEBONE. Mr. Henry Cowne, a pawnbroker, carrying on business in Salisbury-street, Portman-market, was charged on two war rants with having committed assaults of a most violent and unprovoked nature. Mrs. Ross, a lady residing at Moscow-cottage, Bayswater, deposed, that some time ago her servant, unknown to her, pledged a quantity of her stair-cevering, and that she ob tained possession of the duplicate for the same, the pawning having taken place at the shop of the defendant. The twelve months had expired on the 10th instant, which was Good Friday, and on the following morning she (complainant) went to the house for the purpose of redeeming the property, at the same time presenting the money and ticket at the counter, to a boy, who told her that his master was not at home. She waited for nearly half an hour, and was then told by another 'female that defendant was probably at his other private dwelling, over the way. She went out, and returned with another person, to whom she had communi cated what had taken place, to the shop, and seeing defendant there, tendered again the money, when he stated that the things were sold, and consequently she could not have them, and that it she was determined to do anything more, it must be by " due course of law." The defendant further told her that he would place the covering which had been pledged upon the counter, and that if she took it he wou ld g i ve her into custody, and perhaps cause her to be transported The property was accordingly laid upon the counter, but fearing ulterior consequences, she refused to take possession of it, ex • cept in the regular way, viz., by the payment of the proper sum advanced, together with the legal interest. She turned to leave the shop, when the defendant abused her for going across the road to look for him, and knocked her against the dwrpost with such violence, that she had suffered therefrom ever since. The second charge was made by Alfred Thomas Oliva, 19, Salisbury-street, who stated that at the request of Mrs. Ross, he went with her to the shop, and that on the money and ticket being tendered. defendant told him to walk out of the shop. He (complainant.) said he sh ,, uld not do so; upon which defendant collared and shook tlim violently. He also struck him a blow upon the neck as he was ping out at the door Mrs. Ross corroborated Mr. Olive's evidence. Deflulant in tach case called his boy, Albert Drew, who denied that his master had acted with any degree of vinlen A either to Mrs. Ross or to Mr. Olive, the latter of whom, as alleged by him (svU ness), applied opprobri ous ep i t h ets towards his 'luster, who ejected him from the shop, but with no more force than was necessary. • The MAGISTRATE further questioned the several witnesses, and being satisfied that the allegxlms of unjustifiable vio lence had been fully male out, remarked that the cases brought before him were of a very disgraceful nature, and for the assault upon Mr. Olive, which was the more violent of the two, he should inflict a penalty of 31. ; for that upon Mrs. Ross, 2/. WORSHIP -STREET. Five athletic Irishmen, named Dennis and William Regan, William Genghan, John White, and John Suißyan, were placed at the bar before Mr. Broughton, charged with having resisted and severely maltreated several constables of the H division, two of whom were confined to their beds from the injuries they had sustained. It appeared from the evidence that between eleven and twelve o'clock on the preceding night, as police-constable 193 H was on duty in Spite Melds he was called upon to quell a violent uproar in a court at the back of Commercial-street, Whitechapel, on proceeeing to which he found a large body vet] of Irishmen, 3 had just left a wedding party in the neigh bourhood, engaged in one of these general encounters which form among them the usual conclusion of such ceremonies. On interfering to put a stop to the disturbance he was forth with knocked down by the eldest of the Regans, and several others of the Irishmen immediately set upon and kicked him terribly as he lay upon the ground ; when another officer came up, and while springing his rattle for assistance was also knocked down, and his rattle wrested from him and dulled to pieces upon the pavement. The noise of the rattle, however, brought two other constables, named White and Doughty to the spot, but they had no sooner entered the court than a joint attack was made upon them by the prisoners White and Dennis Regan, who finished by felling them to the ground with the truncheons they had taken from the other officers, and with which they had been laying about them in the most merciless and indis criminate manner. One of the prisoners in the course of the encounter suddenly drew a clasp-knife from his pocket, and declaring with an oath that he would rip up the first con stable who attempted to secure him, made a desperate lunge at one of the officers, which cut completely through his belt and part of his clothing, but the man was fortunately over powered and secured before he was able to carry his mur derous threat into execution. After a desperate contest, which WWI is the whole for nearly all hour, a strong re. ... . : . ...»:. , . inforcement of police was dispatched from the station house, and the whole of the prisoners were eventually taken into eustedy. • - - - Nearly all the officers who had bee n engaged-intire dis turbance exhibited marks of the severe treatment to which they had been subjected; and a certificate from Mr. Mears, the divisional surgeon, was handed to the Magistrate, which stated that the constables White and Doughty bad sustained such serious injuries on the head and other parts of the per son that they were confined to their beds in a dangerous condition, and that some considerable time would most pro bably elapse before they would be able to attend to give evidence. The prisoners made the usual defence in such cases, mu tually throwing the chief blame of the transaction upon their companions, and all of them expressing contrition for the violence of which they had been jointly guilty; but Mr. BROUGHTON considered them all equally culpable, and having intimated his intention to commit them, ordered them to be brought up again that day week, to allow time for the result of the injuries the constables White and Doughty had suffered to be ascertained. THAMES. Santyel Standen was charged with stealing three chests of tea, valued at 75/., a pair of boots and three hats, from the hold of the schooner London, of Dundee. It appeared in evidence, that on Sunday morning, about three o'clock, Inspector Griffin, of the Thames police, and his boat's crew were on duty on the river, off Banksige, when a skiff; containing threa men, passed them. The in spector and them in conversation as they shot by him, and one of them said, "Let's get the things out and put the boat away." The suspicions of the inspector were imme diately excited,.and he directed his men to give way and row after the skiff, which was rowed alongside the coal barges moored near Southwark bridge. The police galley soon boarded the sk►ff, and two of the men jumped out, got upon the barges, and made their escape. As they retreated they called out to the prisoner, who was not so nimble, " come on yeu -, come on, the police are upon us." The pri soner also attempted to make his escape in the same direc ti in as his companions. The police gave chase and over• took him before he had proceeded many yards. They brought him back to the skiff, and found it to contain three chests of tea, three hats, and a pair of boots. The police took the skiff in tow and proceeded towards the station at Napping. On their way down the river the prisoner said " It's eh up with me, I shall get lagged for this, I may as well tell you where we got it from." Griffin asked him where, and the prisoner slid " I will tell you when we reach the place." When the galley was abreast of Hore's Wharf the prisoner pointed towards the London, moored there, and said, "That's the place we got it from, and if you go on board, you e ill find a hamper ai.d chest on deck, and a small case near it, which we had to take out before we could get at the tea." After the prisoner was lodged in the sta tion-house, Griffin went on board the London, and found things in the situation described. The after hatchway was open, and the hatch itself was found on the top of the com panion. The inspector immediately aroused the captain and crew, who were not a little astonished on hearing that a rob bery had been committed. The after-hatch was put on over the hold on Saturday night last, but was not made fast, and the thieves had no difficulty in removing it, and raising the tea from the hold. They could not have done this without making some noise, but none of the crew were disturbed. The thieves were armed with a crow-bar, an iron bolt, and other instruments, which were found in the skiff, but which they had no occasion to use. Mr. BztonxtuP said the case was complete against the pri soner, but in order to afford time to the Thames Police to look after and apprehend his companions, he should remand him till Monday next, when he would be committed for trial. He could not let this opportunity pass without com mending the vigilance and alertness of the Thames Police. It was quite clear they were vigilant and active in their duty, for the property was recovered and one of the thieves in custody a very few minutes after the robbery was perpe trated. _ _ William Beamont, a youth about 18 years . of age, was charged with assaulting Margaret Beamont, his step-mother. The parties live at Cottage-row, Poplar, and on the night of Sunday, the 12th inst., the prosecutrix, a young woman, was quarrelling with her husband, when the prisoner, who was present, interfered, and beat his step-mother in a very savage manner with his fists, and threw a glass at her head, which was cut open. Several pieces of glass were taken out of her head, and she bled profusely for some time. The pri soner followed her from room to room, and continued beating her for some time, and also struck her with a sharp instru ment. He had beaten her on several occasions before, and her husband had also ill-used her. Mr. Broadwater, surgeon, said the woman was brought to his shop on the 12th inst. She was then bleeding profusely. A branch of the temporal artery was divided by some sharp instrument. There were several contusions on the back of her head. The prosecutrix did not wish the case to proceed farther, but the Magistrate insisted on its going before a jury, and committed the prisoner for trial. HAMBURGH MAIL. VIENNA, APIL 10.—The Austrian Observer declares that the account published by the German Universal Gazette of the suicide of the Prince of the Ligorians at Vienna, is " a scandalous tissue of falsehood." (From a Berlin paper.) VIENNA, APRIL 10 —The correspondence from Lem burg rasp. cting the late events in Galicia, published in the Journal des Debats, causes a great sensation here. It is probable that the sale of this paper will be prohi bited in the Austrian monarchy after the Ist of July next. It not unlikely but that between three and four hundred copies of the Journal des Debut. have been sold in the capital alone. TreEvEs. APRIL 9.—The women who were drowned at Saar Louis on the 27th of March have left above 100 children ; in the vilav of Puttling• n alone, 60 childrenconsequencehave become orph a n s in consequence of ;his accident. Sub , criptions have been set on to, , t, which already amount to 600 dollars. FROM THE MAINE, APRIL 10.—The affairs of the periodical press will, to all appearance, undergo a change in the course of a few inoritli at least in Prussia, where it is expo eted that regulations for the press will be issued, which will abolish the censorship, as far as the affairs of the interior are concerned. On the other hand, the excesses of the press are to be prevented, as tar as possible, by a very stratuent law on this subject. The German periodical prt ss will thereby assume a new form, since the Prussian ordinance must have an influ ence on the other states. VIENNA, APRIL' 9.—The Arch-Duke Governor- General of Galicia arrived here yesterday, and will stop several days. It is affirmed that the reforms which the Government intends to introdt• e in Galicia are founded on the plan of taking from the Nobles all the patrimonial rights which they have hitherto enjoyed, as well as the police authority which has been ex.:lu sively in their hands. Great changes will likewise be made with req)ect to what are called the Robot days, (answering to the French C0r4,1). Num erous pro posals. made by persons high in office, who have been acquainted with the province for yearA, will also be taken into consideration. Among them is one for the dissolution of all the monasteries, and the abolition of all the privileges of the Nobles. The author, who be longs himself to the highest class of the aristocracy, proceeds in the conviction that almost the whole of tht Polish nobility, without exception, may be consilered, as conspirators and deserving of this punish. ment. According to his views, the citizens and pea sants should enjoy the same rights as the noblemen. POSEN, APRIL 9.—ln consequence of orders since yesterday, the fifth division of our troops will entirely leave the Grand Dutchy to-day. That this order is now given and executed, is a proof that our Government is convinced that every spark of the fire, which threatened our province, is extinguished, and that the manifold apprehensions which some persons still entertain are wholly unfounded. HA OVER, APRIL 14.—This is the birth-day of her Royal Highness the Crown Princess, who complig. - A her 28th year of her age. In the course of the forenoomthe Pr:ncess received the usual congratulatory visits, and afterwards went with the hereditary Prince, her son, to the parade, where the garrison were drawn up to re ceive her. The Crown Prince seldom visits the parade, and was not present t '-day. He is said to be still suf fering, and has been iibiiged during the winter to abstain from his favourite anvisement, music ; n r has there been any concerts at Court. The King was not at the parade. BERLIN. APRIL U.—The Consort of Prince William. the King's uncle, died last nig t, after long suffering. She was the fifth daughter of the late Langrav e Fri deriek o f H esse Homberg, stnd born on the 13th o' ne Ociober, 1785. The charity and devotedne..s shown by her in the disastrous period from 1806 to 1813. caused the late King to place ber at the head of the order of Louis, founded by hint—Hamburgh Papers, Aprill7. DISTRICT Number of casual poor relievAedSv, U d:in l : . food, cloth ing, and other necessaries in the trl comprised in the asylum districts torM il e s ti at;dthPeailosh,ers law Commissioner. in the . year ending Lady-day, 1845, with the l ) cost lstn ( e )f t u e c o h in reli e f prising the following unions an Central parishes • Holborn, Strand - London (city ), London (' Le, ; (east), London (w‘st), Sr. Giles-in t' F. d St. M. e-_ ie:ds an .t. Geor PI poeor relieved, 57.593; St. Jame , '., - Clerkenwel; St. Luke; d St. Puncris. Numb2r of the total cost of such relief 4. 7301. 85. North-Eastern D:strict—G•ainr;sio:4 fla.pliney, Pop lar, Stepney, West I-11m, Whitechapel. St. George-in the-East, St. Leonard, Shoreditch; and St. M,,tthew, Bethnal-green. Number of poor, 30,996; cost of relief, 2761. 3s 6d. North- Western District —comprising St. George, Hanover-square ; St. Jame*, Westminster ; St. Mary Abbott, Kensington; St. Luke, Cheliea ; St. Margaret and St. John the Evangelist, Westminster; St. Martin in-the Fields, Marylebone, and Paddington. Number of poor, 21,465; cost of such relief', 2931. 101. South-Eastern District—comprisEg Greenwich, Lew. isham, St. Olave's, St. Giles, Camberwell ; St. Mary Magdalen, Bermondsey ; and St. Mary, Rotherhithe. Number of poor, 14311; cost of relief, 1641. 14s. . - South-Western District—comprising St. Saviour' : ; Wandsworth and Clapham St. George th e Martyr,, Southwark ; St. Mary, Lambeth ; and St. Marv, Newington. Number of poor, 42,020 ; • cost of relief, 289/. Us. 4d. Western District—comprising Brentford, Fulham. d Richmond. Number of poor, 7,430; cost of relief 911. ls. 6d. FAILURE of THE BANK OF LATHAM AND CO.—Tho exact position of the affairs of the bank cannot yet be fully ascer tained; but an approximation to it may be gathered from the state ment made by Mr. James Worsfold, the confidential clerk of the company, at the meeting of creditors on Tuesday last. From this it appears that the liabilities of the concern ar soewhere aut 100,0001.. and the assets from 50,0001. to 65,0001. e The m failure willbobe felt very severely in all the ramifications of our traqing anti merest tile pursuits, not only as regards present loases to individuals, but also on account of the closing of a banking establishment that was ever ready to aid and assist the honest and industrious tradesman in his laudable endeavours to raise himself in the scale of credit and re spectability. For nearly a century the house of Latham and Co. has been the fostering parent of that enterprise which has raised Dover to its present prosperity and surpassing eminence among the towns in East Kent. —Dover Chronicle. A TUROSTLE'S NEST IN THE STEM OF A TURNIP.— Monday last, as Thomas Thwaites, Esq., of Holesfoot, near Applesby, was inspecting his stock of fat sheep on the grounds of R. Tiukler, prise,' ,of Eden Gove, near Bolton, he discovered, to great sur a throstle'sr nest, containing four eggs, built in the his branches of the flower stem of a turnip, a proof, among many others, of the scarcity of sheep in this district, as, in a locality so favourable to tur nip-feeding, the crops would all have been consumed long before this Now of We year, hail Ilaceg,t9eu plautlfal.— Westrilerekra4Votege•-• J . • Y ‘. c:+ , • . ROYAL NAVAL BEN E VOLENT SOCIETY. A Quarterly Meeting of this Society, instituted in the year 1739, for affording relief to officers of the Royal Navy, their widows, and families under circumstances of misfortune and consequent distress, was held yesterday, at the Thatched House Tavern, at twelve o'clock. The Chair was taken by Captain Sir Charles Ogle, R.N. - Th:Te was a very numerous attendance of members on the occasion. Among the gentlemen present we ob served Lord Radstock, Sir H. Baker, Bart.; Sir Edward Codrington, Captain Dickenson, Lieut. W. Bedford, Captain Bradshaw, Captain Drew, Captain Larcom, Commander Payne, Captain Kelly, &c. The Secretary, Mr. Dickson, proceeded to read over the minutes of the last quarterly mf eting of the Society. Letters were also read from the Earl of Haddington, Vice-Admiral Sir J. A. Ommanny, Captain A. B. Beecher, and Cap. F. A. Schaw. From the report of the Society's accounts it appeared that the total amount of monies received by the Society, since Jan. 13, to March 31, amounted to the sum of 1,1361. 10s. 2d. Of this sum there had been received from Life Subscription £2s 0 0 Annual Ditto 442 18 6 Donations l6l 19 6 Interest on invested property 506 12 2 The expenditure of the Society during the above period had been on account of grants voted at the last quarterly meeting, 4321. The other expenses, including rent, printing, sta'ionery, investigation charges, and other in cidental expenses, the sum of 232/. 18s. 7d. The thanks of the Society were voted to the auditors of last year, and fresh ones were elected for the en suing year. ASub-Committee was appointed for the purpose of examining the memorials of applicants. The nvicting was addressed by Sir Edward Codring ton, Captain Bague, and Commander Payne. A long discussion took place upon the subject of Miss Hoare's application. It appeared that at the last quar terly meeting of the Society it was resolved that no further relief should be afforded to her. In consequence of that resolution she had published what she had termed a manifesto of her grievance, and had, to a very large extent directed public attention to the Institution in question. The present discussion arose upon the ques tion of re-affirming the decision of last quarter. It was at length moved by Captain DREW, seconded by Admiral M'INLoN, and carried unanimously--" That any further relief granted to Miss Hoare from the funds of this Society would be injurious to its interest, and contrary to the pledge given in the address to the pub lic, which states it would exclude the undeserving from participation in its benefits." The Committee then proceeded to inquire into and decide upon the merits of the applications made to the Society. The number of memorials presented was 86, and the sum proposed for voting was 4801. The cases having been disposed of, and grants of money to the amount of 5131. (being 331. over the sum originally proposed) having been voted to the various applicants, a vote of thanks was given to the Chairman, and the Committee rose at five o'clock. RAILWAY SQL ARE MARKETS. L, AP RU STOCK EXCHANGE.— B The RISTO sales are—Caledonian, s%—Great Western, Fifths, 34—South Devon, 30—Wilts, Somerset, and Wey mouth, 2.3 t. LIVERPOOL, APRIL 20. STOCK EXCIIANGE.—Much change cannot be noted in the Share Market: since the publication of the list of the 16th. To-day, although the business has been limited, there is an evident tendency to improved prices. The sales are—Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Cheshire Junction, 14 p.—Birkenhead and Holyhead Junction, 9s. dis.—Chester and Birkenhead, 49—Ditto, 201. Shares, % p.—Derby and Crewe, 1 p.—East Lancashire, No. 1, p. - Ditto, No. 2, %p. —Edinburgh and Glasgow, 71% —Glasgow and Dumfries, % Grand Junction, Quarters, New, 27% p. ex d.—Huddersfield and Manchester, 2 dis.—Huddersfield and Sheffield, 2% p.— Leeds aad Thirsk, 5% dis.— Ditto. 50/. Shares, 2%,dis.—Liverpool and Bury, 6% p.—Ditto, New Shares, 1% p.—Liverpool and Leeds Direct, 3s. 6d. dis.—Liverpool, Ormskirk. and Preston, 6s. p.—Manchester and Birmingham, 76%—Ditto, Quarters (B), 84 p.—Ditto, Continua tion, 19s. dis.—Manchester and Leeds Extensions, 1% p.—Manches ter, Midland, and Great Grimsby, 4 dis. —Midland Stock, 401. Shares, 11% p.—Northumberland and Lancaster, 18s. dis.—North Stafford shire, 1% p.—Rugby and Huntingdon, 183. - 6 d. dis.—Sheffield and Lincoln, % dis.—Shettield and Manchester, 106—Ditto, Quarters, No. 3,4, dis.—Shropshire Union and Canal, 1% dis.—South Eastern, 36% -Ditto, No. 1 (at 18 dis.), 1 % p.—Belfast mil Ballymena, 5 die. —Ulster, 8 (—Dutch Rhenish, % p. MANCHESTER, ♦rttiL 20. STOCK ExertAlcoa-The sales are-Bideford and Tavistock, 20s. die. - Birkenhead, Chester, Mold, &C., dis.-Birkenhead anti Holyhead Junction, 20s. dis. -Blackburn and Preston, 3% p.-Bos ton, Stamford, and Birmingham, 148. dis.-Cheater and Manchester Direct, 22s.dis.-Derby and Crewe, 1% p.-Eastern Counties, Per petual (N o. 2), 61. 17s.- East Lancashire, No. 2, % p.-Edinburgh and Glasgow, New Quarters, 4 p.-Glasgow and. Duunnes, dis.-Grand Union, h c. d.-Huddersfield and Sheffield Junction, 2% p.-Lanca shire and North Yorkshire, 1% dis.-Leeda, Dewsbury, and Man chester, % p.-Liverpool and Bury, % p.-Liverpool and Leeds Direct, 1 4 dis.-Liverpool, Ormskirk, and Preston, % p.-London and Manchester (Remington's), 1% dis.-London and South-Western. 76%-London and York, 3-16 dis.-Manchester and Birmingham, 76 -Ditto, Quarters (B), p.-Ditto, Quarters (C), p.-Man. chester and Bury Atmospheric. Bs. 6d. dis.-Northumberland and Lancashire, 19s. dis.-North Staffordshire, 1% c. p.-Preston and Wyre, Halves (B), p.-Preston and Wyre Extension, % dls.- Sheffield, Leek, and Crewe, % die.- Sheffield and Manchester, Quar ters (No. 1), 4 p.-Ditto, ditto (No. 3), par-South Eastern and Dover, Halves (so. 4), 7-16-Teen and Do,* Valley, 13s. 6d. dls.- West Riding Union, 255. Gd. p. LEEDS, APRIL 20. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The sales are-London and Croydon, 21 cash —Manchester and Birmingham, New Quarters (8), 7% p.-Ditto, ditto (C), 6% p.—East Lancashire, No. 2 (lade Accrington), 2s. 6d. p. - Huddersfield and Manchester, I% dis.- Huddersfield and Shef field, 3 p.-Leeds and Bradford, 25 p.-Leeds and Dewsbury, 1% p.-Leeds and Thirsk. 5 14 dis. Ditto, New, 60s. dis.-Liverpool and Btu y, New, 1% p.-Newcastle and Berwick, 7% p.- Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhampton, dis -)London and York, 235. ad. dis.-Gla,gow and Dumfries, 17s. dig. • west Biding Union, 31. 75. -- Birkenhead, Chester, Mold, &c., 275.'dis. —Leads and. Liverpool Direct, 45. 6d. dis.—Manchester, Buxton, matlock, and Midland, par — Northumberland and Lancashire Junctlon,; 4l o :a s itm . dis. no -- dn N , Lm or eea th nkeid. Staf fordshire, 2 p.-North Western, 9s. dis. I 1. S 6 T s o . _ c a s heiId EXCHANGE. and i n h E c e:s; s a h E e i r s L e D , a leirssahronettritrn Pot teries, and Crewe, 13s. , 20. STOCK EXCHANGE.—Great HULL difficulties present themselves in share holders being brought together to call upon promoters of new schemes to wind them up, and unless the Government plan be well matured and so made as to avoid all further unnecessary loss and expense to the unfortunate seripho' ders, it will be use,ess ; the promoters of the worst lines showing a tenacity to their own projects utterly unac countable, except it be for the purpose of genii tg as much as possible out of the deposits. The demand for scrip at low figures continues, although not in large quantities. The sales are—Armagh, Coleraine, and Poi trash, 12s.—Bandon and and Bantry, Ga.—Chester and Birk enhead, lie. 3d. -- Derby, Gainsborough, and Grimsby, 13s. al— East Lincolnshire, 17s. 6d.—Essex and SurfolOt, 12s. td. -Clasgow and Dumfries, 30s. 6d,—Hull and Barnsley Junction, 235. Lon don and Manchester (Remington's), 17s. 6d.— North British, Carlisle Branch, 345. Rugby and Huntingdon, 233.—Welit Riding Union, 39. 6d.— Yorkshire and Glasgow Union, 235. NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE, A:mu. 20. STOCK Excuazicz. , - The sales are--Durham and Sunderland, 24 East Coat, 2Js. 6d. dis. —North British, Halws (Carlisle), 9s. p.— Northumberland and Lancaster, 225. YORK, Aram 20. BTOCK EXCHANGE. ---The sales are—Grand Union (Nottingbam to Lynn), 1 0s.—London and York, I%—Marches ter, Buxton, Matlock, and Midland, 21. 28.-- Newcastle and Darlingt on Extensions, B!. k i North British, Carlisle Extension, I/. 14s. —N urth Kent and Direct Dover, 14 —Welsh Midland, 1/. 3s. 6d.—York and North Midland, New (East and West Riding), 8%. = SALE OF THE LATE DUKE OF Suss F.."I'S COLLECTION OF Mustc.—On Monday the sale by auction. of the extensive and valuable collection of manuscript and printed Tangle, the property of his late Royal Highness the Duke of Sussex, look place at Messrs. Christie end Manson's auction-rooms, Ring-street, St. James's. The manuscript music was divided into 108 lots, consisting of arias from various operas, with Italian words and parts for the orchestra, scores of single pieces, cantatas, and sacred oratorios, all Works of the most emioent composers, and which fetched good pric s. The printed moor. comprised operas, with German wordsy of Mozart, Handel, Gretry, &c.; Italian words by the Caine composers; English, by , reach, by Gluck, Picciui, Isnard, Rouriseau, Haydn, Aubcr. ,Stc..; Italian arias, sacred music, glees, Englih, Scotch, and Irish songs. &c., &c., forming altogether several hundred volumes. I'IIoTECTION.—A special privilege for oils class or portion , nt the co mmun i ty to rob all the other classes; and for ti.eir robbery, are protected by Act of Parliament. [AI)VERTIsEMENT]—SPLENDID AR.RANGEMENT OF Lo oxisa - GLAss, producing the effect or a long arcade, and so bewildoring as to cause a doubt whether you are in London or in old Rome. "Arch follows arch, and pile succeeds to pile." This unique apartm nt is devoted to cuttin,; and arranging th e hair in, an d w i t h anot h er h av i ng a beautiful view of N.ples, are on the ground-floor. In ealln.g attetiboa to their establish. went, Ilihs and Sons beg to notice the advantages of their system—viz., they never take apprentices nor young men from the country, nor object to cus om-rs asking for the same man to wait upon them ; every person has clean brushes, they never being used twice, without being washed ; and parties are not pressed to buy things they do not want. Address, Ross an d Sons, 119 and 120, B shopsgate-street. - - [ DvERTISEMENTI-- iiiaii,way% Ointment and Pills are producing immense sensation In the Bahama Islands. A letter received recently from Mr. Frederick Williams, of Nassau, states, " I know of many here that have tried Holloway's Ointment and Pills, and who have derived the greatest benefit from their use. One case in particular, a lady, whose foot was in such a dreadful state that, to save her 'ife, amputation was deemed necessary, and yet she regained the complete use of her limb by these celebrated medicines." Any wound, so:e, ulcer, abscess, or bad leg, even if of twenty years' standing, will readily boil by their application. Sold by all dealers in medicines, and at Professor Holloway's Establishment. 244, Strand,-London. lIIRTIIS, sth 4o t of inst., 10 ' t . , • the lady of Captain Yorke, Royal Little Ormeshy, Lady Lacon, of a daughter. he 9th inst., at . O.ni the Pak inst., at Chichester, the wife of S. G. Cockburn , Esq. 0 of a son. the " r ife of 31r. Albert, surgeon dentist, Ludgate hill, of a son. On the 15th inst., at Norwich, the lady Of Captain Cockburn, Staff officer of l'ensiowers, of a daughter. On the 15th inst., tit Rowdell Rouse, Sussex, the wife of Captain E nO O gn i i i i It t el l i te r 8 1 ' Chester, 9 th Light Infantry, of a son and heir. On the I f•th inst., the lady of the Rev. J. G Gifford, of a daughter. maiOncotihm%l6nt,liElst,orttat Caanltigehdteenr: Hyde-park, of a son. hill, Kensin g t on , th e l a d y o f James On the 17th i list., the l d ady of floury Adams, Esq., of Radnor-place, On Thursday, the 16th instant ß , al i thTUnitarian Chapel, Chowbent, Lancashire, henhe Rev. Dr. Harrison, Walter Maberly, fifth son of terthe late Step Curtis. EA , of London, to Louisa, youngest dough of T. B. W. Sanderson, Esq , of Atherton, Lancashire. ...Psq., of Cambria, Great . Swan Port. On the 6th of November, at 5 . wansea, Van Diemen's-land, Lieut dith,neat J. H. Wa. " --, • Lb N., F.R.S , to Maria, daughter of George Mere- On the 12th Inst. at Philadelphia, United States of A mer i ca , M r. Sli R obert Waller, of' Luton, Bedfordshire, England, to A n n Eli za , d aughter of W. R . Thompson, FR . of that city. °iThomast the 1 " lost, at St. James's Episcopal Chapel, Gl asgow, of rli.! 1.1 Beghte, of Gl asgow, to G ertru d e D uvernet, daughter the late Lieute nant -Colonel Henry Duvernet Grosett Muirneaci, of Bredisholine, Lanark. On the 16th inst., at All Saints' Church, Southampton, William Stephens, Esq,, to C a th er i ne Saunders, second daughter of the late Captain W. it. Smith, R.N., of Southampton. On ihe 16th inst., at Leamington, the Rev. Piers C. Claughtort, Rector of Elton, Fellow of University College, Oxford, to Fanny Sarah Clarke, daught er of H. Clarke, Esq. On the 16th inst., at Alverstoke, Hants, Henry Ensor, Esq., o f Sherborne, to Louisa Jane, youngest daughter of the late Mr. T. Paul, of Gosport. On the I.M6thungo inst. LIED. brother, at Milton, next Gravesend, Adam Park, surgeon, of Park. On the 17111 inst., at Preston, Lancashire, Septimus Gorst, Esq. On the 18th inst., Miss June Murray, of Conduit-street. On the 16th inst., at Cheara, Henry Thomas, Earl of Carrick. On the Bth inst., Mr. Richard Robinson, of Myddleton-street, CLOD• kenwell, aged 72. On the 13th inst., in Rodney-street, Mr. S. 11. Samuel, aged 41. On the 13th inst., at Tunbridge-wells, Lieutenant-Colonel Jame* Lewis Illgtlns, late of the 6th Dragoon Guards, aged 71. On the 14th lust., at Moor-hfl, near Southampton, Sophia, widow of E. R. Rarwell, Esq. On the 14th inst., Mr. W. Dobson, of Worcester, hop-merchant. London: Printed and Published by ?(1111D0 YOUNG, of No. 112, Strand,Printer, at The Sun Office, N 0.112, Strand, in the Precinct of the Savoy, in the County of Mld:oex, Ttleeday, ;April 2:i 11146. fiaA44 14.74 A .. ; , :~:. a4~ ; , . ~.~; ~": ;~`<%:~ . ~~:,,, ~\:. . ON, TUESDAY EV.ENrNG, APRIL 21, 1846.