The Sun. — London, England, 1805-07-20 00:00:00

Lordship permit me to 'say .1 few words as to the thanieter and situation of my client?!' Lord ELIA:l4l3OllOl7.filiT4-7“ I must putltri . end to ther.,.e speeches to charlteter, ‘-,hen t4oy, Interrupt the buAiness of tie The Tipin.tiff 24'6%310n-suited. ' • ' VEAXXLS. , DRIN-tll5. The Plaintiff is a Surveyor, the Defendants ate ,NurServinen in the neighbourhood of I s raidon. Thi s waS brought fora compensation for. drawing , :certain- plans of : tA . vo estates in Snssex, ,and: one in the vic:inity Egharrt. Mr, (-IARROW.:Said, thrit the Plairitiff' was one of 'the mnst,dist...ingiiished. artists in lii profession, acid that he luld drawn bleats in compliance with the or- dt- of the Defendants,: who employed in making extensive surveys for Government, under dir t eion of. J. :Fordyce, Esq. Surveyor-General ,Of the Crown Lands. One estate. v.'4,,s called .Pang- - „dean Farm, consisting of 1,053 IR. 39P, ; ano ther Poynings, A. 01..9,1 and a third, .comprisinginorethan double that extent,vi Z. 4,808 k. For :these draughts., the Plaintiff ,had only charged .three halfpence and two-pence per acre; and yet • his modont demand was not satisfied. On the I laity being produced, they were exatnin cd by Thomas, Cubit; a Land Snrveyor, who depos cd to tlie , exquisite skill of this Artist ; and said, that tOr plans se : iiiter cxecutd 3d. - an acre would bcaicely be an adelnatvrennineuttion. D,l F;t:: N in reply, said, that what the Plain irt was merely copying tlie n.ctigh plan of Cie ; that he had nothing to do with ti:e surVey itself; and for thii be should she w express Agreement had been. made, which had been •fuliii!ed. by the Defendanti. , • :;t•d Driver waS called, ...m . hp said, the tv;;., Joe employed to draw a fair plan up-: 00 'The survey itself waa p prolix opera ti , lvzei performed by the theodolite, by chains, the angles of every inclosure with flambe anti by perainbelating each field, , ;1..,g the hedge's, ponds, gates, paths,' and ; one question, my Lord, I !:Titbit C • ause." . tin:v.... any agreement .with the Plain . t %speaing the !:.i - rms3 . op.: which be would prepare plans `r"—A. "He asked two-pence per acre ; propOsai tic a., Objeeted to; and be positively en . f,;. : y to excet.tte the plan i Which 11:1Ve been exhi:;.:- C:1 of that cum. I made a memorandum of the • , is now in Court." ELL;ITIOItOUGH. , --" Here is a positive ac;: ,' : ,to which there is no answer. It would be eNtranrdinary if the Plaintiff Could support the CharLe Made on the,cuStorn. Supposing he were to prepCrea . m 2p of Europe, and to ..eharge in this way, what would be ; the mapitude of the expellee r The Plainta was nonsuited: 011N11.17ANEY AND WILLIAM HUTCHINSON, V ozotior UVNM:as. The Plainfiffs 'were. wine and spirit-ineraants, to, whom Sarnuel Saunders, the brother of the Defend ant, On the dissolution of their partnership?a6ted in the , capneity of ws,agent . lhr closing their concerns , This aiEtifu was brought on a bond far wool. given by th e P.:l.Adant for the faithfhl discharge of this duty by hit brother. 'File: Sontt:nron-Gr,t4F:a An, for Messrs, Thirbey and Butchinsen, said, that he should; prose a balanee due from Samuel Saunders, the agent, to the amount Of 4t 31. i os. and he, should produce the bond Which rendered the Defendant liable for the defitult of, his brother. , The Defendant had put . three pleafi,upon, the record; the first was, non ilte,next, that he had not received fife, money ; and the third, that no money remained in his hatkli:', Cilarles Autietsun was called to prove the signature to tliL bond. 11s said that fie saw it signed by the Defcnctint. On his' cross-examination by Mr.G....8-'• Ito lie said he did business for !lot and that • lte y...ts vulgarly called a Hack ilev He ad - ndttel.l that he :was riot sober When he s•aw it exo entel, pud that he had Said he had ;lot seen it• exr , c , .: , 11. , .. , 1; yet, on mature retletion, after the re- 7 of the Shbperua to attend in this cause, he re inf.g!,:bsled distitiCtly that ltc had seen the signature e 'Oda aiThced to it. .1.1t , :y g:ive Llckr u, •rtad ' w;t4 intaxic;ited, bat t Itree dayn,, ;is was repreAliteci, \cow long glasses,' 'lint they chef riot drink On 'Oat ig:.(4lliion by the yard. Beira-;: presstd hrthts, )v! , • iaL't that he had repe.ttedly ileelitred:that he was , too drunk to g6,te thc.hot•tse of t Defenclant,. 'and did not str tat itistrtu.nent exectile4„ 'for be .waS too snitch in 114. 1 ",i0..-lii 'c at all. Ile had, hOweVei, re, tiet`tAl t Intti,iietitni, tent: 119 W convinced evp,..yated deehtratiotts vik'2 , re.t erfOneOils. Said, 'klildcr th o se eir.. h:ad .ro oh:jet:lion:to refer the whole t.;, , , , ,.acro'Th.iit the Rir, to , arl .A.ttotoey, to ttt porson th4t :h4a Eicquired the -:eh.A..7iaor Mau. ► 1 !,., • vordilA WaS till en till: the Defend-. t.) tcicietit:e. II ?P. 'r Ito Ns rsoN. , , ; nt:111 by a ( - Arpe.-nter against /;,. , „, , .itt(.)l"Allg3-strect, ;11.1d lit i I. 9(„ ;,inlc)ratt claimed wi • 'of the larger sum of I,:ltent. tract oottp this of his trade : anti that ! L. , 164; t; Was to be, ;A (,Ih....rpersc.m ih tlacl , , . • • , that ilny set-of (in • j ,i.• i,;, caned, Cri,Ritow, .! 1 41.; pi"opu. - ,eti tt teferellce, f ,i:),:!)1.2: the, advice Of Cimnser, 1.11!' ;,i ; AttQriley purtimiclotiily resisted. ~(::' ~ . j'a::; ll i.ia 1 • ...: of the AVitites.ius was ;heti brouglh forward, 8.11,1 11.0111 di.sfvkl:tive evid , :lifT, Mr. EItbKINE \cos 111), 0 11 thePlai:itiff to 4....,.et.!de Co..the Coun 3 cl on the othe.r side . wls .c...(1 withdraw. His Lori,Lhip stu'J ii fv.w that it apparedto Ii 1 a iit case br. tilt! f. , l)titi:l,:(7 Cif t 4 party sLvniecl in anclt.rie cause CtiOr{/11CA.i. hst dlenvery v.rai made, whiclt ter itilwiit-J .aifair. appearod that witio:l - 1110 !c • 1 ~ 4i. i:~ `lt . , ti) , LONDON : l'Ontj.c.l by d,t the SUiV-Chil i! _ r, }`it ncir 1112' Attorney'uilJerstoo(l.tstte 'meaning of the - tehri rfferiftice; but 'l,vhen, it 1,-i'ts V9petly ex •plained, by the 1 - tsistapre of Mr. Ertilmi-i; they •immediately coneurred` in what had been tecom, mended. JULY 19. DR. 111111 TON V. PRICE, BART. Mr. PARKE said, that the Plaintiff, was-a Welsh Physician, and the 1:) - efendant a Welsh Bafonct,and, :•singular as it might serin, the dispute between them 4..espeCted the tide to zt•.ship. . The Plaintiff's inerit as a Doctor was,undonoted, but he had noskill itt law; and the Welsh Baronot was equally, ignorant upon that : subjeCt. The Baronet, somehow or other, to6k it, into his head that he was entitled:to 3.:4t.bs_of.a shipealled. the Fanny, of 'Swansea, and the Plaintiff thought he might become s purchaser of those shares. He agreed•to do so'at,the prieeol , t3ol. he paid 4001. but refused to complfe the ba6 , ;0,i.n., till the title to slid ship was duly. made ~ The Baronet brought : an action for the reniaiffing 301. and whena ,was ready for trial, the part IN agreed to' rthrit, not, as theyought Vti have &lie; to a Omtleman at the Bar, who might have .known something7of Lord 'Liver pool's Aa, but to a Nerch3nt- in Wales, had • fteve; rd of it. Ihe'relk..rence was Made a Rule of Court, and the award dite&ed • that the'sDo6tor should pay the 301. and that the Baronet should make a good title to the Fanny of. Swansea. The money had been paid ; and it was adMitted by the Defendant that he never LA a Bill of Sale of the Fanny, or any other iit , ti,tnu 'of conveyance re..- citing the Cortiticat , , , NOW, the Mi of 34 GOO. Lord Liverpoors,A6l, ennaed, that no .trino,P.T of :t ship -shoUld be - valid unless it s.'tot.ld be nrat'2 by a Bill of Sale, ' . oritaining a reeital of the Certificue. of lt,%ltitry• 1.4)0n thi4 ilefeet 'of title,: the Plaintiff had brought_ Insaaion for money had and received. • Lord Et.t.i.:NloltOUC.!T WaS of opinion that an acs ticin for money hactand rm,ived coal(' not be nutted. lit e reference- had been made at little of Court, the I';aintiff might either move fZir an attach» , nient for the failure of making out a good ,title, pur. » Aant to the award, or ha might king a special •ac, tion on the case. • The Counsel for the Plaintiff went into proof, to slew that the Defendajit had not that interest in the Ship which he had sold ; trait his Lordship ad hering to his opinion, the Plaintiff was nonAtited. ANNE. READ P. T. Jo liN30::". The Plaintiff fer.ides at London-place, Hackney the Defendant is a young Man who had paid some attention to 11 , 1iIss Franices Stewart, to whom the for mer was, guardian.. This Aetion was litought to cover the stun of 01. lent, under circumstances which will appear in the cause. Mr, GAtiaow 'observed, that the Def4mdant : eng,aged a house., toward:4 ad - i nking the 1,. o f,H which, the Plaintiff bad' lent hi LT) AM.. M. joht; son; , ,by paying hiS addresSes,to the young Lady; had got into the good grat:eS of the old one, .biat prise;•sing somo.vcrSatility in hiS disposition, he ohobe now to rejea the female,--and retain the money. • MisS trances Stewart proved the- hand-writing to a bill for the amount stated;drawn by the ',Defendant.' On the Plaintiff, and paid by the latter. :Ent; tippji catiot) of this 'stun Was to the lea3e of a house lately occupied by. Mr. Blaarnore, in Fleet-Market, in ,' which it was slut Defendant' and 'Witness • should reside., She. then proved the sigoanir of her .late lover to the following letter, .ad.lressra, on the 2tith of June, I/304, to Plaintiff: n Am—l have considered regardinl4' the Lease of the House, and if you think well of it, I Mil YOl.l a Bond ;pinny vith'euy father t for the LeaAe ane Fixtures, -and pay it in five yeara, The interest to be paid. half-yearly. (Signed) " TKOS, JOHNSON," Mr. P .11. a. the Defendant, remarked,_ that hi. Learned Friend had not proved leis case. There wan an =Count for money lent, another for money had and received, and a'third for au account stated; but, there was no proof of the payment of the bill. Franos Stewart wa , i then, by his Lordihip's pen." mission, re-called, whelt shodeposed, that she al ways understood that the money was not paid to the Wendant, but was given aim Blackinore's .ktndS.- Mr. (4,tanoxt.---" It is perfeCtly clear that 'the young , Lady 112 s , rnoro for her sweetheact, -than for her guardian." Mr. Pal;,Y.t.„ for the Pefendant; expressed his con certi that the far witness should hc , , placed in a Atli , ation o;;;. exhibiting herself to the Court under such delicate and painful diCtitnitalleQS. it AS' duty to she* that this demand was wholly xmfounded,and that the lease for -•which:this money was given was not the.property of the Plaintitr, but the Defilv.i.aut. le should produce a letter -which would minus e all uncertainty, if his instructions- were correct,, and which would entitle his client to the verdiA of the Jury. Thu letter: was read by tli o the Court, and Couched in the following terms. It wall ad dressed from the Plaintiff to the Delend:ult, and was dated on the 2 1 .Jd of Junk', " —I received your latter, and have, in enneeituince s consulted Fanny'tisuardidlir, ibt.nlit'd hic.wbuld bring an adieu against You, it J 3 itt: could 4ive suilkitto tutnd (Oen promisor of marriage}. We all undeistood yOtt !Milani; to it-tarry her. I canto forward -on her aceotint, and to nay cu. gagement I will solid on her account', I.Ait n ot 00 y our , ;; w itk, Out her. I will hove liatidot to do with your fath er , or auy other person unknown to rue. 'I think Sour father and you a re both not tio good as You stuitild be, She Cart bring for. ward tool. 1 like Ito default, nor will make nune. Conic, 'parry the girl, site can pAY 1 .;51. Toward the Le.:o,e, ana 1 haverraid 561. If yon Lout itme th cc - mit:R.l, I tYped mti;ll - 4entity as I'approvc,"-- tier sonic obs...;sva awls the letter conalltdfsj 4 " if your own friends will not server you, how caa uyo ex pe,:d it fron t stranaer ~* ANNE It 17, AI)." The Lelr i ned Counicl contended; th at. froru the to rtn3 of thi.; and the 'other tittFts in evidence,. the Plaintitf had tal ,- -cn the lease-upoa herself, and thatAherefolv , She could not kruand .the (l the Defendant, which waS a part psyrnent of . suelt • • :Lord This defence i neither supported' in law nor in- mora6 the Defendant had :cheated the girl, anti now he wants to cheat the ,Guarclian also." • Vertlid tot' 'IR, Plaintiff, 501, JEFFgO4I V. BREWER. Mr, akurtow - operted.tli'w its d common.case -of an :idiot - 1,11pol) a biii e);cita.ng,! f©r 301. of which the Pl:thitiff holder. att,t..theleattata ac-, I.IIA I) 1.1.A12.111, of Nri, ':,!: , rtktr-cplirt, 116w-sty:et ;,40( 4 Y , 1 1 2, i NN'Lere-'4,il4'74griniitS fc, .eeptnrciinitY tlie•ciic. was ilobctuded 'for tht: raintitY, by proving the acceptance to be in the hand-writing of tliej)pferldnit. GA4taow said, the answer to the case was a very conclusive, one; 'that the, bill i tainted with usury, to prove whichrhe'called Centletuan of the name ot• , r Downs, *Wip swore, that the Plaintiff discounted the bill, 'and thok for it. a 7s. piece and four or five shillntgs, and that he only received a check for 291. • I SS. so that 11 the w;tness - wasbetioved;there was' clearly usurious -interest taken. On his cross 7 erzuninatitin by Mr. Easz.itir: this Gentleman gave an accotint of hiinself:..--That. he had been Minister in many chapels, but that he was not a Minister in any leas lcular chaperat cular :he had preached in ber ; that some of them wgre ehapcis supported.by voluntary, contributions', but he was now away from them all, or he could not now be in,Cotirt; " He ;said he was informed that a great deal of in'salence would be direeted to him oh that account: Lord Et.LENßottotlon Observed, that nothing had hitherto occurred to justify that apprehension ;_ he should an sWer any question tha t littd a tendency to try the issue in . the cause in. which he was a witness . „ but .not to: miter into any histOrical account at the ad ventures of his life ; tmy thing that was not intro duced for the purpose of the Cause he need not..an- SW'Ci.; but it was proper that the Jury should km* Who he wlis. Tne' Witness then said, he had Served appren ticeship to a lAtanber and glazier, and that he now ke4lis a Staffordshire warehOnsc: in Bloomsbury : he theit . g'ave an heeeviti* of the circumstance 3 of the Bill in cdnfirthation of the ease of usury. Another Witness was eLtnined for the porpose of corgradiaing but Lord ,ELLEN4IOIIOUGIE observed, that the tendency of his 'evidence was to confirm the testimony of the last 'upon which. the Plaintiff was :notthuited; TONES V. -lIRADrORD. Mr. ERSKINf stated this to be a case of-a till of Each Inge for 981. 33. drawn on the Defendant, and signed by a person of the name of Popkins, and ac ,tqt6d fol• the Defendinit by Hopkins, who was the Defendant's, Partner, and or which the Plaintilf wa3 the holder for a valuable consideration. 'The ch.-feace set up by Mr. G.malbw was, that Hopkins, the Partner ufi tim DetZ ‘ liciant, h,id, been induced by a Person of , the name of - A.lfiVingan, (a considera:_l3 rogub,.whb would not inake:his aopear, ance, fbr be 'Alight 'heref.tfttir have to orisi,;, , er f c ,z at the 0n , .1 of it rope), to go Into parthe - rship,:with hiln in tb,2, j:ipaaning trade ; Hopkins wt:s.an hotte, man, biit a ntisentllle scribe., and .:\l'Mag..in kct~t Otis books :ind dt.cw this Bill, but tbe) never were in faa. in partnt:rsitip„ this rogne no' more right. to use the natne Of ID:pkins t17::14 any man viac...nt lie never sits . Jut Lord, ElloLNßOßOtffilf Said, that z , ,s. the Bill vas dra;vit in the name of:aced; and accepted, onhoth: He thought that on ese of the part „n having a right to accept, lue hat a right to in dorse the kill over, lbr neither Was done by the.Pc 11!ndimt. The last point, although. riot very doubt fist, ii Lorilsltip sai , ed 'to . :the . befendant„ in order that he may have the opinion 'of the Court upon it, if th parties should be so advised. Nth Y AND ANOTHE. 4 II V. LEE. FAISKINE Said, that , the Plaintiffs, :Messrs. Noy and Templar, were Attornies of respeththility„, brought this iEtiOtt against the DefendOts,•' whom, he was informed was a tertutle-toller and 'A beg 9r, whose fortune he should Cell in a minute ; that be would be subje& to the debt and costs hi this abut from his own absurd vehemence and j4lPetil osity. 'llllB a6iion had been 'brought against turn some time ago, and the 'Plaintiff's had wished to drop it, but he goaded them, on With application to,' the, Court. 'l,* Ia Defendant had a son-in-law of th 4 statue of Godolia, a ho: being onbarrassed in circlet).- sta !ices, his tatlior-iti-law, the Delodaut., employed' to e. jiaiiltitis to do the business of Attornies in 'draw ing a deed of composition betWeeti•:GVlolia and his creditors, which they did, and for which their charge for all' the trouble they had was only 41. 95.. „ Cso dolia engaged to pay his creditors five4rillings.ln. the `pound but he l'iliseended, .and paiil them nothifig. The Defendant undertook to pay the ,Plaintiff's bill. This case was proved by. a Gentleman of the name Staples, ;who recommended the 1 feri4at to the Phihitiffs as.,nien 'of Mr. PA was instru&ed . to call the Defendilot's three daughters to prove that. Godolia.wits the poriixti who undertook to pay the Plaintiffs, but they 'inv . :9' nothing about the matter,- , --Nerdiet for the Plaiuta —Damages 41. 1 - 0. • -,Policy ef insurance, to 1,,.,,,, of the lo is sustained by the ship and trgo. The policy being prov ed, it appu.ired from t. 1,4.,, evidence of C:;pt. Kerr, that he sailed at the iar,g, that fro:n Nexvcastic, for London, on the 4th Joey-- Vial' he . got near Yarmouth lloads the weather, .vcas sQ bad he was oblige,d to reef all the sals.-, The sea ran so high that it made a deapsagieever - his ship, and prevented his taking off the jih, 0. he was obliged to cut. it away, 'ley were is very great danger for a considerable tirce, and wad obliged to set a storm-jib to make the 1-,ei wad the land, and' prevent her Trash loan2citrz, 11,,,q gate' eohiinued,. and lie, with difficolty; rata Bell Harbour. While he was moored tilt:re, as. direct el by the Pert Captain, a Datti3b Str)w ran dos on ~ the biana:Tand stove in . two of her plxilcs, in tba, ddle:enplagit.:(J:tehreccaal:igno, l a , e t r i y d .inrcuinc:ht i . n . e Course of a very short time the water NOS Mt) fel eS.ertioll was made . for the space of two liouri,' .. j , h'D On cross:examination, it a re PP jot was not aground - * t‘i c h had been 31 !nage, in the declar. tioi. damaged, of course so, though Did way. The nes.: the Plainti'" the general average but not being able li~. r ____ , 81,1? f fiS, ofs °. r0..z.:1..t:234.a0410,31...,....„....,........(L)gtne,1,Yhtuai1d1aiyat:1-11,0trlitieullg.,:d s y jort..o ..,,,,,) 1 1 . , j o, i ) ti ' l, o u r ...._____......0f1i:;,,,,,11, .....,,)'' tter. I - tIAR alb P. 1 wi e 1 4 ' ~,,On .Thursday rnorolag tical-v Samu' aril ' Captain vi i i tlie E• • INI vI. fvl 1 i to %1,,,5 PIO* „! baseor,u clll , ..........:„.......,...,,,, 1 . 1 r t 1 .0 i ( * l4°) illa a n d Little i t c li h c ° a rc i i t i o .' e l t :h c.., : a lli r a l s .s .Le i .. a. slt i 1 t 1.2 .ythf::: I: : : .:; c i I , ir t4 : f;s3 , l r i 0 , ' ' ; ; l t r . : l l , l .(l:'' ' ''l';'l ;:i (0101-I",voroottoh. tcehnOryi:inLsitv.titti:nr,.t cl,..o.\lol;:iicif,ce„, ilv.ic:r:cl3:l:l vils;,oV z) daughter 01 Sit Henry .14, %Worth, ,I, 10,,,aiti" ke I6th tint. at Marg•ite, Mr. (0,90,, viol. rr On mosiday, ;it Path, in her gait) year, Mr': s$ t 5 a . r . the ibtliot March, at ticywood.gt3ll. :'1.;,,i',01, tilt, lairmic4, Mc I oho Armour, 000 ot A LI • '. Ecitnburgii. * 11111.1 E OF SrOCAS. vislcitoar• Bank Stock, ~, a v ~ 'Y 5 l'er C.'..• go A i go?, 1 ltlii:l Ift>ici,iatt:.'.ls;ailvi:l/44irli. S Per Cent. [79.;;.. ' i I..Nchetoicr Dili:, , per Ct:rit. 7S ! . 'r 4 als. fa 3. to llt ; per .C*, t. Vxd. tr:. , . (ntimutii, 5 i , „ c e nt. ,' Cent Car. cg ,i, ':- 1 olveri,ll 3 Ve, 1 i t s , i n T,, Ann: i 7 s-Ji,g,i, ; 01110 Al''' 9 l a, (:) , Ditty} Short ikon , - I:;Ains. tor ()L''' ,' ......„,„--.......‹' j'‘l; 1 ': • - I .N. ; . '.',...:%. _NI . • .'ret,BlE 5t,)1.1., t. t. -,tsc ' 1-:•,..', ibr, el-T.ALF, i,, i , ,•:;.0 ' , 1 ' ~,,,i Oly. arder ~.. !tie ,Proiti,l,?; 1/,‘ Wednesday; I.lly itr it tkt Nnit,:,; ~,, ,i,,b I.l,kidavv, ;It • 'l'weive o'clo, ~ ..... , ~ :1 , , , : 1, ' 1 Oit ,_ " Tglif:S.troiy of ork , ', ~ ill l a Y te l d ' tkolir Iltli'llel-c:;:r .:;l":1(:; : : l'- ' : OAK..K.r.; Ft ...;,.. vv4ll wortti ii..;.-: .ut.,,,,, • ara a mint .: :' 0 :to,l le,:t. (I A.E. A. 14.11::- , j , t ;:r • 'II:ma:SOA 11,111,,,,e i:., ilili.d, :10 her' il ,' ... , : . ~'' for WAter.c4cri-,.;;;,;.., 1,1,;03 the l'olit”Vjog L., 1:.,1.,. , 4.:‘,.l"'nees riiv C ; re, Sir, riugiws, O , A , ~,,,,,.. Mr. Tbotat.,,i :.lariage, t,v.ao.. . . .1 till ; -'‘' lel Difto upon ~:igh lit;adJ, veal' .It 9) ',t , p jVi (;ilint3,l, towur. , 2 , 'Alt, 1"I' 1::(; 1)1I1Zi ;It Bult:,bury, war itig:itttal'' ~,,, tempt. '-.-.,. r, la 1:;1P1',,,,0,0, ' . I.c 1.,7iTt0 at %lint) ; lkir. Oho —':-..'"1,,t`,,' c'eil.:'l.lol i .1. i-c vi,z,vo.ll, api.,,yo4 111 , i t ' c r--) ' t . 'ttiJ il , Ittrth;,l 13.11 tioul-r.'s way tn: iiio‘vit 0 1 ' '.,.'llelnistu rci.* A., Oi.w;er will .bc Provids4d l ''' r ~....- '11, .r . ,,,, - - --I"'el' ....."."..".., • Sk . ; '-; -_ Til'f l l{ ;',...:.,1 No.! ;,,,3 :i:1..,, ~it, ,/ \JABS. trait ~ ._ ; -., 1m; ~, t: ,o, JAL t 0151,., ::,- ,i • .. 1 ~:, , _ '"'.,„, 3 .'.! ~y 0 4 : I f, aciie ;fre., . , ,-'l.• ~. ~ , ~ ierl:,,J.:4: '' ' ' ' fryer)) i•I ' 1 ~ 1.1::u oir'. ILO: of *lie Nviv.)lc i • i... ; „- to'al„,, ~ , , 5i,,,,, ,„,,,,,:,,,,. tit A, by' r;ailar 1.--41 'C` .1 i 1,,, ~ 1, ti.,.1:f,,, - 1:1Vi;Tly it'prvst hrr itr.',1,"kir4.,;....,,---.!, , i ,idilto'c'oe'vP, si),: it 1CC,11111411,1 ,' % ~.., ~, ~„ I . ..; , I 0 : :,f, ;; 1 6,r.ltzteitop:,:, ~. 1,1 ~,,, V.lllOll ' :, ,, , 1 1 , P,' N.cclt, at ,:. - , ''' ' ,, '' ,` 1)i.v.,,;tr•,..ef ~, ...-;:: .• :. , rt, ~ '`.l. 10i,. -o,i, 4i, I i'llirt i a ~..v• :• , i:;:..c0.,„,„,,,...r''''e' • . . nwlaalissenn,octrZ3re-eurandimalluatljuti'l^n-cct.hicli had Dal , -- , in the deelar, tion aS the cii.h.,e of the varp.lgill; damaged, o f - course the.eifea of that cootiilX4i(lor: 1t ay. The next thing the Plaintiff went l e ' r ,.!, the general average of the dantiqe doac to I; but not being able to prove the tunoaat 01 11 ' .' the Plaintiff was no, , isuited. .....--. . . SANSEURY V. aIIiTTIIEWS AN D CO, - 'This was an action: on a breach °fauna., to It appeared that 'the Plaintiff had agrec ll 4 3d of January last, to purchase frail) tile DeN72-„,„ I I 6 hags of Sinyrna cotton, at one, shilling ai pence4Lattpenny per pomvl) bus this 101(1.! ton beginning at that: tint, , , to l'oe, the 1. never could get the Defendant to deliver i 0;,...- -,' though he several times sent an ordl lot `! . a s :lotto .ven at one time t e ndered him ': in, n. England Notes as payment. The Defcfi (6 / 1 11 :-. stantly evaded the deliver}; ott different p;1171, and finally said the Plaintiff' Fhotild act. 11; 0 , A t o , less be took his wad fur the \Night, ot ,AS's exPetx:o Pf weighing. ' Thi. , the Plitintilf v‘tr".llo agrpe to ; but having disposed of Me ,cl;* , : e ili h en ini t he so eln.nt.,elirevd.ibi:ii:so, the contra6t wit! ) ;;I'lfsr ; leudants, he I.Vas obliged to eniploy a lirob.Fr;tel , cut torn at tlu3 athranctxl- priN:;oll7obic: itit1,5111:1'4111)°1r144,..:' the pobrid. . - ,s'ti ;e Serjeant BAYt.r I - , ,on the part bfoe I. ; '' det; attempted to set Up an irrcgtilarity 'ill illeeitiSji.t! I:+tit not being able to soLgantiate it .1) Y r oki .. the Jury gave a verdij.t. I.)i - the Plainoff--P dy e, ' Thovai , R• / i'l i• r 'I.. ' a bof ..,0 '.:::.sasrtsisatp;cte,,,,:‘l.c,,..:is'flLibe).:oeal;kfiticlio.' iil'i:ti,t:te' t a h t e . o ( 1 1:: 1 1 ,_ " : ) ,. ti e i c! , 'i i n' t ;', .I,,kisi Es W.% t..Krut,..(.) Illailhall 'Lill, Ile° ' 1 , 1 11 ( 1 stealing:several ortielo thercin• ‘ SHIP NEICS.. ' fo ll i cgAi 1 wrtp, ..Itio' : v . t,toti Passed by—the rrederick, 6:llccr, Iltill <; i e, i ,,,, i; ,,owi , way; R egulus, ill:r.ius Christiana, and c l l ., r t 4 1 1. 1 . 1, pr e ! , t l e t ..,•?;:.1,.1,i0"`1,' 1 1 ,.;. j:;;(i ro , 1:- ward, Good Intent, Cu),lx,'l,'.b ~11:1,1,ixo: P;l''''''Y' 01. men.. Ili .a S n : l,s ,il:d i.o — r ? n e e C%iye'usteriantdile.;2d, N.I.:IVCII, 1 .....„,„ 1 l'''''' ibi :.... , - r.foo roxiv.L V. CITATrat; Mr. Eitsmtstit stated this to be a Setio:lc - an i‘ss:ault, the, Plaintiff being Chtirehwat - o,qt . ;Ind 0% erseer of the, Poor of Allkillowe , ;, anti a rt,l-, - lor by trade. 'rhe . l)e.f . efidatit, a perk::: k.f. respeetable circumstance , . in the Gl:ih4 Tr:ttle. It appea:ed, that Ow Piaintitf had called at the Det'Ondant's .-wll , ll ite wag alw..,nt, and his Clerk. paid thePoor-)%ites to the Plaintirf. fondant when he heiird of it was displeasm. i .,bccanw he intended to dlspUte The Assevorwtit and the tuiloWillg day went to the Piit ttttt ti home , and insisted on it' . '111" the 13..i0 of thP hate- wtir was slie‘frn to hitn, and the Defendant observed; tllat the charge was wrong ; that the Plaintiff was paid by a young Clerk; if The 'old one liad b , ...1 pre se.nr be would have been up to it, upon which words Biro --the Defendant threw . the boo!c in the PlPintiff's ftee;:but no further act" of vioieme tool; pace. Mr. GAltgow observed, that the Defondant had been .Churchwarden, hut had Of-woutitioA al- I thiblecustom of 'baying p4bli'Cl ditILICTA at the Lord Llll,ENiallopcni oh Heil, that this sh iulcl 'not he stated, unless evidenco %T..; to be c.!lled. ifehlieldbr the Plaintil:--Dani(vs 401. COURT OF COhtMON PI,.KAS, Cu IL,}IALI,iIIII,Y IS, bITTIV6 9 At NISI PRlUS t nErorex 5144. jAmEsuaNsfisLo • ~ • AND A,,VEtI.II, luitY.• S"?1ITT V CORS ' oN% anti aion against the Underwrite s, on PubliOectbk Arvt ARMITAI:k Scums, of Soo th Motton4tMet , Paper, Leiters. for thQ Szc, (tiGsi •-i4l' / uL..t't. be adde" . A - -