The Sun. — London, England, 1846-11-26 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Nov. 25. Ile LORD CHANCELLOR sat in his Court at West-rain to day at ten o'clock. NEW QUEEN'S COUNSEL. The Right Hon. C':-axles Buller, the Judge-Advocate coral, one of the Under• Secretaries of State for the Colonies, and Member for Liskeard, was called this morning by the Lord Chancellor within the bar, her Majesty having been graciously pleased to appoint him one of her Counsel learned in the law. The Right Hon. Gentleman, having received the congratulations of the members of the bar, withdrew. CHRISTIAN V. FOSTER. This case stood on the paper to-day for judgment, but his Lordship postponed giving it till the first seal (Tues day next). COOTIE V. LOW.NDES. Mr. BETHELL replied to-day in this case, and The LORD CHANCELLOR postponed his judgment. The hearing of the appeals of " Walford v. Adie," and " Bartleet v. Green," were postponed; and his Lordship, having thus disposed of all the cases in his paper, rose before twelve o'clock. Thia was the last day 4 term, and his Lordship will not sit again till the first seal, Tu"sday next. ROLLS' COURT, Nov. 25. THE HENSAL-GREEN GAS WORKS.-ELLINTES V. TAYLOR.- JUDGMENT. Mr. KINDERSLEY having replied today, His LORDSHIP delivered judgulent. He said this was a motion for an injunction to restrain the defendants from proceeding with works which they were erecting near the dwelling-house of the plaintiff. The question involved in this motion was one of great import. ance, for the public had the greatest interest in the maintenance of such I, gal rights as were contended for in the present case. The plaintiff was possessed of a house in which he re sided, and which was situated a short distance from a piece of land possessed by the defendants, and upon which they proposed to erect a gas manufactary. Their works were now in progress of erection. The only mis chief that could ensue to the plaintiff was from the ma nufacture of gas, and he had nothing to apprehend from the works considered in themselves, and without reference to what was to be manufactured in them. The manufacture of gas was not to commence till March, consequently the mischief apprehended by the plaintiff was future —speculative —and if the description of works were of that character which would produce unquestionably those effects feared by the plaintiff, the Court would give the relief here sought for. Bat, looking on all the cases any way analogous, he could not find, with the exception of one particular case, that the Court had granted an injunction before the matter had been decided by a court of law. The principle upon which that (the Rolls') Court acted was clear. It had no jurisdiction to determine what was, or what was not, a nuisance, but had a power to prevent a nuisance when mere legal orders were insufficient to do justice. If it were clear that a court of law could not give those adequate orders, the Court would be right to interfere. The question then really to be con sidered was, whether there was any instance where carrying on gas works was to be regarded as a nuis ance, and no legal proceeding had determined such. It was, no doubt, very disagreable in any case to be sub jected to the effects of the volatile products that arise from the distillation of coal, but whether these effects were necessarily such as would consti tute a nuisance was a different question. He considered that the plaintiff should have given a notice to the company before they had proceeded so far with their works, and incurred the consequent e xpense. Looking at all the circumstances, it was not in his power to grant the injunction. He should wish to refuse the application in a way that would not preclude the plaintiff, in the event of obtaining a verdict, apply ing again to the Court, or of bringing his case before another judge. Mr. KINDERSLEY applied, on the part of the plaintiff, that the case should be allowed to stand over. His LORDSHIP said he had no objection, and the case was accordingly ordered to stand over. VICE CHANCERY COURT, Non. 25. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.) This being the last day of Michaelmas term, his Honour the Vice Chancellor of England took motions to-day, but none of any interest came before the Court during the morning. Mr. Charles Buller, M.P. for Li,keard, having been appointed a Queen's Counsel, was in the course of the day called by his Honour within the bar. It is generally understood that the Court will not sit again till Tuesday next, the first seal, when his Honour will hear motions in his Court at Lincoln's Inn. (Before Sir J. WIGRAM.) BLAIR V. BROMLEY.—JUDGMENT. Judgment was delivered in this cause this morning. His lioNoua said that at the conclusion of the arguments he had expressed an opinion, to which he still adhered, that he must decide upon the liability of Bromley to pay the amount claimed by the plaintiff. The only question was, as to whether the act of William Bromley should be considered the act of the firm of which he was one of the members. The false repre sentations of Bromley must be admitted at el taken as the act of the firm, to raise money for the purpose of effecting the mortgage. There were some points raised in the discussion into which he did not enter, such as whether or not the defendants were injuriously effected by the act of William Bromley, which act un questionably constituted a suggestio falsi. In order that his decision might be placed on as broad a basis as possible, he had looked into the Jaw on the question to see how this 'matter could be treated at law, and he believed he was correct when he stated that there here no means by which the plaintiff could have had a remedy at law, in consequence of the intervention of the Statute of Limitation, for the evil effects that had re sulted to him from the misrepresentations of William Bromley. He considered that this was a case which came legitimately within the jurisdiction of that Court, and he would make a decree that the defendant should pay the money with costs. JORDAN V. JONES.—JUDGMENT. His 110 NOI7R also gave judgment it this case. A decree was made to enable certain parties to make s conveyance, and one of those parties being a married woman, who had refused to join in the conveyance, the order applied for was, that she should be directed to exe cute the deed of indenture, which the Court granted. PENNINGTON V. BUCKLEY. His HONOUR delivered judgment in this cause, which ca-ne before the Court on Saturday last. The will of the testator directed that an income of a given amount was to be paid to as many persons as the interest of his stcck would admit. The question was who were the objects to which the in come should be given. They were described as being such unbeneficed curatos in a certain deanery in Not tingham, whose salaries did not exceed 35/., and who should be recommended by the beneficed curates of that deanery. It was contended that this description applied to one class of persons only, namely, these whose incomes did not exceed the above sum, 35/. per annum. It appeared to him that these words re ferred to two classes of persons—namely, those of such limited income as was specified in the will, and those who obtained the specified recommendation of the bene ficed curates of the deanery. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Nov. 25. Mr. Edward Strutt took the oaths on his acceptant e of office as one of her Majesty's counsel. Mr. Charles Buller, M.P., Judge-Advocate, was called within the bar, he having been appointed " one of her Majesty's counsel learned in the law." THE QUEEN 5. WATKINS AND OTHERS. The defendantshadheen found guilty on an indictment, at the instance of the Navigation Committee, of creating a nuisance in the Thames, at Garden-stairs, Greenwich, by persisting in maintaining a pier there, after repealed notices to remove it. The matter was brought before this Court, and an order was issued directing the Navi gation Committee to abate the nuisance. It appeared they had misunderstood the order, and at once directed the "water-bailiff to remove the pier, and he accordingly did so on the 28th of July last, the defendants assisting him in its removal, believing that he was empowered to do so by the order of the Court, but subsequently, find ing they were in error, they forcibly replaced the pier. Mr. WORDSWORTH now prayed the jedgment of the Court on the defendants for transgressing the order of the Court. Mr. Sergeant Sums., who appeared for the defendants, dwelt upon the fact, that the order had been misunder stood by the Navigation Committee, who, it was under stood, were to appoint a properly qualified person to see that the nuisance was properly abated, not absolutely re moved. The pier could not now be considered a nuisance as a stone pier, which was objectionable, had been re moved, aad access to Garden-stairs might now be easily obtained. After some discussion, on the suggestion of Lord Denman, it was agreed between the parties that Mr. Walker, the engineer, or a properly qualified person to be appointed by him, should be empowered to adjudicate and abate the nuisance with as little injury to the pre perty of the defendants as possible, the defendants to pay all reasonable costs. THE QUEEN S. THOMPSON. In this case a rule had been obtained calling upon the defendant, who is an attorney of this Court, to show cause why he should not be struck off the rolls. Mr. WHITEHURST, Q.C., showed cause against the rule. His objections were—that the offenca imputed to the defendant was clearly an indictable one, and, on ac" count of the time which had elapsed since the offence was stated to have been committed—namely, December, 1844—whereas the rale was not applied for until last June. The defendant was ch irged with the concoction of a scandalous conspiracy to obtain money under false pretences. He was charged with temspirine: with a person named Luke, who, in August, 1344, oc cupied some property in Noithamptonshire, to concoct a fraudulent title in his name to some land, for the purpose of inducing a solicitor named Pell, or a client of his, to lend him (the defendant) 82/. or Tool. upon ~ , ,them. mid that the defendant well knew that Luke hail DO title to the l an d i n quest i at, and that the whole matter . 7 :{../r.voiciF. wal i n i a pie" of fraud; but then the 1: moved and-obtain e d on hearsay evi sse take -raw he appr e h en d e d t h at t h e C ourt wou ld not Y',lYrPeeedloo.s in a case i n w hi c h t h e o ff ence an charged " s' one, and conseque n tly indict , able. Beat*, if the case was allo we d t o procee d i n i ts • present femy the defendantmtztili)e betrayed int o might e be used use t d o the admisiglita of statements against Wel on his tri a l. The when proper mike stleYi an opposition was , pr oceedin t ga had been completed. In the ult er i or a c ase r roiled i the sth of Barnwell and Adolph us, Mord Denman was reported to have said with re •spect to * rule calling upon two solicitors to show cause 'why they should not be struck off the rolls for improper 'conduct, that the offence was an indictable one, and that the defendants should undergo the ordeal of a trial before such an application was wade to the Couet. The THE SUN, LONDON, TIIIIRSPAY MORNING, NOVEMBER 26, in g s in obtaining an Act of incorporation; and that the mere fact of his lx:ing a co-promoter was evidence to go to a jury, that he had auth.)riseil the contracts to be entered into, and insisted that if there wore no other evidence than the mere fact of the defendant hiving joined the provisional committee, yet that that was sufficient evidence to go to a jury to prove the liability of the defendant, and his being a party to the contract, and that authority was given by the defendant to every other provisional committeeman of the same company, to bind him for any contract connected with the Company, and that the solicitor in the suit had the power to give ail orders, and thereby bind the defendant. We think that no such consequence follows as 'a matter of law. The mere fact of the defendant being a provisional committeeman, such agreement amounted to no more than a mere promise on his part to the effect " I will act with other persons for the purpose of carrying forward some scheme," it may be in a committee or in any other body who have taken upon themselves to perform that duty subject to the approval of the general body, the acts are to be confirmed by the great body whom they propose to act for. The agree ment to he a committeeman is an agreement to carry out a certain scheme under such circumstances as may have given rise to the scheme. The objects of a provisional committee may be various, it may be to establish an hospital, or any other charitable institution, to which persons are to su bscribe, either for a charitable motive or any other, it may be to establish a school, or a place of meeting, in which the persons subscribing are to have beneficial interest as shareholders. It may be that a provisional committee is formed for the purpose of obtaining an Act for the construction of a bridge, a canal, or a raiiway. Whatever the object may be it makes no difference in the relations of a member of the committee, whatever be the object ho seeks to obtain, and the legal consequences are the same in all cases, and if the object of the party he charitable or not charitable, according as it is—if fer improper motives it may excite upon some occasions improper prejudices in the minds of the jury who may have to dispose of the facts of the case. Such associations as provisional committees constitute, how ever, no agreement to share in the profit or loss of the concern, which constitutes the real essence of partnership. It would be absurd to suppose that such a relation was meant to be made in any case in which a provisional committeeman consented to act as such. Now, applying these cases. in some cases there is evidence, beyond the mere fact of the defendant being a member of tbe pro visional committee, there are some instances where the question does not seem to rest upon the same grounds, and where there is evidence that the defendant has not only consented to act as a provisional committeeman, but has actually authorised his name to be inserted in the prospectus of the company. Now, in some of these prospectuses there are certain persons described as the acting committee, and in which there appears also the names of the solicitor, and the secretary to the company. In some prospectuses it is stated what are the duties an d functions, and what the objects of the provisional com mittee; such prospectuses have, in many cases, been circulated by the defendant's express consent, and the jury would presume that if such prospectus were taken to the plaintiff, and that it had been sho wed to him, and that he had acted upon such prospectue in the per. forrrance of his contract; and the question. therefore, is, what inference should reasonably be drawn from the contents of such a prospectus. This would of course de pend entirely upon the terms of such prospectus, if it stated the mere names of the committee , and nothing more ; and if no light could be derived from it with reference to the intentions of the committee, then it does not alter the liability of the defendant, and he can not be responsible as a mere member of the committee; and the publication of the fact cannot therefore alter his position or relation. In some cases, however, there are acting committees, who take the whole management of the concern instead of the provisional commit. tee. The functions of the provisional committee having ceased, or in such cases it may mean that the provisional committee have appointed an acting coin mittee to act on their behalf, and to be their agent. In that case the provisional committee would be clearly liable for the acts of the acting committee. Again, do such prospectuses mean where the solicitor or the se cretary's name is inserted, that such persons are regu lady employed or appointed by the provisional cow mittee, or by the acting committee, on their behalf ? Then, again, another question rises, what bu siness should attach to the solicitor or the secretary in question. In all those cases the results must depend upon the particular terms of each prospectus, and the reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. Now, applying these observations to the two cases which have alone been argued before us, Reynell a. Lewis and Wyld v. Hopkins, we are of opinion that in the . first case there was some evidence to go to the jury, we think that the manner in which the question wai left to the jury was perfectly correct, but we think there should have been a new trial upon payment o' costs, but we think that a new trial should be had in order that the jury may have the opportunity of considering the facts of the case, according to the view of the Court. In the case of " Wyld v. Hop kins," we entertain much doubt whether there was any evidence to go to the jury; and we think, therefore, that in the case of " Wyk' v. Hopkins," a new trial should be had generally upon the whole merits of the case. --- I:earned Gentleman cited a number of other cases vihich favoured his view of the case, and trusted the Court would discharge the rule. Lord DEN".AN suggested that the matter should go before a master of the Court. Mr. WurrEnuasT opposed the adoption of such a course, as the defendant preferred to have the whole matter brought before the Court, and as an investigation before the master would be most expensive; besides he anticipated that a private investigation would not be so effectual as a solemn investigation before a judge and a jury. Mr. JAMES called the attention of the Court to the fact that the defendant had become a bankrupt, and that he had been examined before Mr. Commissioner Fon blanque, who had refused to certificate him on account of his improper conduct. He apprehended that the Court ought not to dismiss the rule until further inquiry was made into the defendant's case. Mr. WBITERIJRST explained that the money was lent on a bill at two months, which became due on the 20th of December, 1844. the title deeds being given to Mr. Pell as security. The bill was not paid, and the pro. perty to which the title deeds referred was put up to auction, but an arrangement was made between Mr. Pell and the defendant, by which he was to pay 101. a month until the amount of the bill and some other debt, amounting altogether to 1301., was settled, but the pay ments were stopped on account of the defendant becoming a bankrupt. The defendant, in the whole transaction, had acted as the attorney of Luke, who set forth in his affidavit that he purchased the property referred to in 1803 ; that his name was feloniously entered in 1826, and the title deeds stolen; that ho employed the defen dant to frame new ones, which he did ; that the pro perty was his (Luke's); and that the reason the deeds were renewed was, in order that he might place them with Thompson for 82/. 103., which he had agreed to obtain for him for two months. Other affidavits set forth that it was well known that the pro perty did not belong to Luke, but to a person named Wyman, who only allowed him to occupy it on account of his poverty ; that the defendant had admitted that the deeds were fraudulent, and asked Mr. Pell not to take proceedings against him, which it appeared he indignantly denied. The Court should bear in mind that Mr. Pell was a solicitor in the same town, and that he did not take prooeedings until the defendant became a bankrupt, and long after the circumstances had taken place. Mr. FLOOD followed on the same side, and urged in support of the discharge of the rule that Mr. Bell did not come into the Court with "clean hands" as he had brought actions against Mr. Thompson, which increased the 82/. to 126/., and when an arrangement was made between them it was on the express understanding that, if any interruption took place in the payment of the instal ment, his claim should be increased to 150/. The whole profit made by the defendant, out of the transaction in which Luke was engaged, was only 3/. 6s , a sum so insignifi cant, that it forbade the inference that a professional man would destroy his character for it ; besides, Luke's name was in the list of voters as proprietor of the land, pretty strong evidence that he, and not Wyman, was the proprietor. Mr. ROBINSON submitted, in support of the rule, that the defendant alone was to blame for not having before now appealed to the proper tribunals if he could prove his innocence. He cited cases to show that the Court had interposed its authority, and struck solicitors off the rolls some years after the offences with which they were charged were committed, and held that this was a case in which the Court should so interpose, because it was incumbent on the Court to see that none but respectable persons were allowed to practise in it. Lord DENMAN stopped Mr. Robinson, and stated that the Court considered the case ought to be remitted to the master, before whom additional affidavits would be necessary. The Court had given its opinion with re' pect to the first objection in the case of " King," and considered that the second with respect to time was not tenable, inasmuch as the proceedings before the Com missioner of Bankruptcy justified the re-opening of the matter. BAIL COURT, Nov. 25. (Before Mr. Justice PATTEsoti.) THE QUEEN V. THE TREASURER OF THE COUNTY OF CUNBERLAND. Mr. MANISTY moved on the part of the Keeper of the Queen's prison, for an order upon the treasurer of the county of Cumberland, to pay a sum of money towards the maintenance and relief of poor prisoners, as directed by the Act 53d Geo. 111., chap. 113, sec. 2. By the 2:1 ection of that act, it was enacted that every treasurer of every county mentioned in the Act should, on cr before the Ist day of August, in each year, pay from the public stA ck of such county, a c.rtain sum of money, according to the terms mentioned by the Act to the treasurer of the county of Surrey, to be applied to the relief of poor prisoners in the Queen's prison. On reference to the schedule of the Act, .it would appear that the treasurer of the county of Cumberland, was to pay 101. towards the Queen's prison, and 51. towards the Fleet prison. Then came the Act, 5 and 6 Victoria, chap. 22, by which the Fleet prison was abolished, and section 8 of that Act enacted that the money payable to the account of the Fleet prison, should be paid to the Queen's prison. By the 53d Geo. 111, it was also stated that in case of non payment, this Court, on the affidavit of the keeper of the Queen's prison, shouli have the power to make an order for the payment of the money. This was the first appli cation which had ever been made under the statute. Mr. Justice iI'ATTESON-As it is the first application, you may have a rule nisi for an order. The rule should be absolute. WAITE V. HARDING. In this cause, which was tried before Mr. Baron Platt a'; the Middlesex sittings at Nisi Prius, a verdict for 501. was returned for the plaintiff, for a series of assaults committed upon the plaintiff, who was a process server. Mr. K.NowLF.s a few dais since obtained a rule nit.i for a new trial, on the ground (.f surprise. exAmnEus and another Learned Gentleman har ing been heard against the rule, and Mr. KNOWLES in support of it, The COURT ordered the rule to he discharged. BUSINESS; OF THE COURT.—The clerk of the court gave notice, that on Saturday next the Court would pro ceed to give judgment in ail the causes now standing for judgment on the new trial paper. FAULKNER V. WALLER. Mr. Mu. moved for a rule to show cause why the proceedings in this action should not be stayed until after an indictment, which was now pending in the Central Criminal Court, should hive been tried. The Learned Counsel stated that the defendant in this case was an inspector of the City police, and in the month of March last the two plaintiffs were given into custody upon a charge of forging railway scrip. When they were taken to the police-station a very considerable quantity of paper, in the form of railway scrip, was found upon th( m, and also the sum of 1,025/. in notes. Mr. Justice PATTESON—Do you mean genuine notes? Mr. HILL said that the notes were genuine Bank of England notes. These persons were taken before the magistrates, and were remanded from time to time, until, in the month of June, they were committed to take their trial upon the charge of forgery. The Bank noes and railway scrip were handed over to the defendant, as being one of the inspectors, to be produced upon the trial. Mr. Alderman Gibbs made that order. The trial was post poned, for some reason, until the month of October, and during the interval the plaintiffs were admitted to bail. At the October sessions the plaintiff Faulkner surren dered to take his trial, but the other plaintiff; Fabian, did not surrender, and his recognisances were estreated. Faulkner was acquitted, but the Learned Judge, after the trial, directed that 3601. should be paid out of the 1,0251. to the prosecutor, as he was enabled to identify that much of the notes as his own. The police were at present in search of Fabian, but Faulkner had com menced an action against the inspector to recover the railway scrip and the remaining bank-notes, both of which it would be absolutely necessary to produce on the trial of Fabian, should he be taken. Under these circumstances, he (Mr. Hill) was intrusted to apply for an order to stay proceedings in the action until Fabian was tried.—Application granted. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 25. LIABILITY OF PROVISIONAL COMMITTEEMEN. REYNELL V. LEWIS. WYLD V. HOPKINS. Upon entering the Court, the LORD CHIEF BARON pro ceeded to give judgment in these cases, as follows : In these cases which have lately been argued before us we think the plaintiffs seek to fix upon the defendants the liability of contracts, expressed or implied, and the question for the decision of the Court is, whether such contract was made by the defendant himself, or his agent, with the plaintiff, or his agent. This is a flues tion of fact for the consideration of the jury, from the evidence before them, and it will be for the plain tiff to produce the proof in all these cases, in order to show that the defendant had en tered into such contract, expressed or implied expressly by making a contract with the plaintiff; im plied by giving the order to him under such circum stances as would warrant the plaintiff in concluding, by reasonable inference, that he was liable ; and if the con tract is not proved to be made with the defendant per sonally it must be proved to be made with an authorised agent on his behalf. In the case of a number of actions brought against provisional committeemen it often happens that the contract is made by a third party, and in such cases the point to be decided is, whether such third person was the agent for the defendant for the purpose of making such contracts, and whether the plaintiff entered into the contract as such. Again, the order may be conveyed by an express authority on the part of the defendant with such third person to make such contract on his behalf, but he may not give him a a general authority to make general contracts on his behalf, or it may be enough to show that a general rule exists. In point of law, this would be sufficient to prove the affirmative on the part of the plaintiff, as, for instance, in the case of a partner, when their relations are complete, one becomes, in law, the agent of the other in all purposes, which are necessary for their mutual interests, or the relation of husband and wife, in which the law considers that the husband makes his wife the agent, and in all cases the husband is bound by such contract. This agency may be constituted by the immediate action of the parties, that is, by merely giving authority to the agent, or re presenting any relation to exist between the parties similar to that which the law recognises and makes, or by representing the defendant to the plaintiff as the party making the contract, and that such third person .1 , 13 hi; recognised agent, or that he had relations to create him such ; and if the plaintiff really makes the contract upon the faith of the defendant's representa tions, the defendant is then made the party to such contract, and the represewatives of authority upon the part of the third parts pro ad hoc, assumes that the re lations of agent are established between them. These reeresentations may be made direct to the plaintiff, or wide so public as to have reached him, or it may be made by word or by actual contraet. In all such cases it will be for the jury to find upon the evidence with the assistance of the judge who may try the case. There are Few, if any, of the cases which have come before us in which the contract is entered into directly by the de fendant, but they have been enti red into by other par ties. In one case it was attempted to be proved by a conversation in which the defendant expressed his entire satisfaction at the expenditure which had been going on, he said the expenses were moderate, and that was evi dence to go to the jury, and entitled to more or less weight according to the circumstances of the case. But the chief point of Mr. Martin's argu nt was, that th e re l at i on o f a prov i s i ona l committee man constituted an association or quasi copartnership, in which he w a s an agent f or all the purposes , andliab le for all the expenses in c id en t t o t h e preliminry proceed fendants vexatiously pleaded non-acceptance, without having the slightest ground of defence. A verdict was given in each case fur the plaintiff. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. CLEreKENWELL. CENTRAL CRIMINAL C?)URT. OLD COURT. Joseph Jokes was indicted for forging an order upon the Bank of England, for the transfer of 3/. 10s. Bank Stock, the property of George Edwards and his rile, of Ebury-street, Pimlico. Mr. Clarkson was retained for the prosecution ; Mr. Prendergast defended the prisoner. George Clifden, one of the Bank clerks, testified to the stock standing in the name of the prosecutor pre vious to the transfer. Mr. S smuel Stephen Lowe, a clerk in the Lone An nuities Transfer-office, witnessed the transfer on the of January last. George Edwards, a retired coachman, of Ebury- street, Pimlico, deposed that his wife, whose name before her marriage was Sarah Swift, and himself, purchased the long annuities in question on the 6th April, 1840. This stock he had never given authority to any one to dispose of in any way, and on the production of the Bank book declared that the signature in it was not his. He denied that the letter purporting to give the authority, which was also produced, was his, and said he knew nothing whatever of the transfer until he heard of it through a communication from his daughter. Cross-examined by Mr. PRENDERGAST—Cannot read or write. The four first years after their marriage they had lived together, but since that period they had been separated, and had not received a letter from her for more than three ears. He had given his wife the money from time to time to be taken care of, but what afterwards became of it he was not able to tell, though he believed it was to be put into the Bank. Mr. Thomas Crumpton, a stockbroker—Occasionally officiated for Mr. Baillie, another stockbroker / who hat an office on the same floor with himself in Lothbury. In January, 1842, he had transferred 31. 10s. Long Annuities for that gentleman, at the desire of a person whom he believed to be the prisoner. He had sold the stock to Mr. Clement Smith, a stockbroker, and paid the money over to the person who represented himself as George Edwards, the owner. The Learned JUDGE reproved the witness for his want of caution In identifying a person at the Bank whom he had never seen before that time. Carlton Anthony Goring, now a private in the 31st Regiment, stated, that in 1842 he was clerk to Mr. Baillie, whose business Mr. Compton was in the habit of transacting when he was away from London. He ' confirmed Mr. Compton's evidence, and identified the prisoner, and also the paper which he had produced, as being Mr. Edwards' authority to her husband to sell the stock. Charlotte Arnold identified the writing of the pri soner. She had known him as Henry Clark. Mr. James Hunter, of 34, Bloomsbury-street, had known the prisoner under the name of Henry Hitch cock Barrow. The document produced, purporting to be the authority of Mrs. Edwards, WAS decidedly the prisoner's writing. Mr. George Cowldrey, a goldbeater, of Eccleston street, Clerkenwell, stated, that he had known Edwards and his wife, the latter for twenty years. Knew the prisoner in January 1842. The la , t time witness saw him was on his apprehension on the 9th of September last, when Mrs. Edwards was with him, and they gave their names as Mr. and Mrs. Jones. He had seen Mrs. Edwards in 1845, when he went with her to Mr. Peppercorn's, a stockbroker, to purchase some stock ; and, in consequence of what passed then the Bank porter was sent for, with whom Mrs. Edwards communicated, and to whom she gave a de scription of the prisoner. After that witness and Mrs. Edwards went to Mr. Baillie's office, and told that gen tleman what had passed. Mr. Edwards immediately afterwards went to the Bank. On the 4th or sth August he saw her again at his own house, in company with the prisoner at the bar, when she introduced him as her husband, under the name of Joseph Jones. Witness then immediately recognised the prisoner as the man who had, some years fore, called with a message from Mrs. Edwards, and who then represented himself as Mr. Handley's servant, of Newark. Some conversation then ensued on the prisoner's change of name. At that time he saw a gold watch in the prisoner's possession, which he knew belonged to George Edwards. Mrs. Edwards at that time told him that her first husband hal been dead for twa years, and showed him a ring on her finger, which she said prisoner had put on. He identified the handwriting of the prisoner. The autho rity was then put in and read. Mr. PRENDERGAST addressed the jury on behalf of the prisoner, who found him Guilty. He was sentenced to be transported for life. The policeman said he had ascertained that the pri soner, young as he was. had been in the habit of visiting the house in Henrietta-street for a considerable time. The prisoner was fully committed to take his trial. SOUTHWARK. A case, which excited considerable interest, and which was adjourned over from the previous day, came on for hearing, in the shape of a summons against Miss Emily Mitchell, for assaulting and obstructing two persons, one a tipstaff of the Common Pleas, and the other the officer of the Queen's Bench prison, in the performance of their duty. Mr. Ballantine appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. J. 11. Parry for the defendant. Mr. Sturgeon, also a barrister, attended to watch the proceedings on the part of a gentleman named Herring, interested in the case, and an inmate of the above prison. The complainants' statements in support of the charge were to the following effect :—On the morning of the 19th inst. they were employed in conveying Mr. Herring by a habeas from the Queen's Bench Prison to the Arches' Court, Doctors'-commons, where he was a party in a cause. When they got outside the walls of the Bench, Mr. Herring was joined by Miss Emily Mitchell, and they all proceeded together to their destination. On their return to the prison, when they got to the corner of Holland-street, Biackfriars-road, the tipstaff and his colleague insisted that the person they had in custody should go down Holland-street, and by that route to the Bench. This, however, was resisted by the defendant, who urged Mr. Herring not to proceed in that direction, but to go down the road. The latter, acting under the in fluence of that advice, expressed his intention not to pro ceed the way the officers wished, and a cab was called off the stand, in which it was intended to place Mr. Her ring. When the vehicle drove up for that purpose, Miss Mitchell placed herself at the door so as to preclude the possibility of placing Mr. Herring within it, and she at the same time collected a crowd by her extraordinary conduct, and, as alleged by the officers, she threw such rash impediments in the way, that they were under ap prehensions at the time that the mob, excited by her behaviour, would have attempted a rescue, and enabled the g ntleman they had in custody to make his escape, he at the time being under heavy liabilities as a debtor in the Queen's Bench. At length, however, and after a gentleman was called to render assistance, Mr. Herring, finding matters assuming rather a serious aspect, got into the cab with the defendant, accompanied by the officers, and was safely lodged in his old quarters. For the obstruction that ensued on the occasion, originating in the conduct manifested by the defendant, the authori ties of the Queen's Bench Prison considered it requisite to bring the circumstances under the consideration of the magistrate, in order that those officers, having an important duty to perform, should not be obstructed in the manner above described, but protected in the due and proper execution of it. Mr. Parry stated that he had several witnesses in at tendance to disprove the statements made by the com plaining parties, and whose testimony would thereby show that it was a trumpery charge altogether, and got up with a view of persecuting the parties, particularly Mr. Herring, who had somehow rendered himself ob noxious to the prison authorities—that, in point of fact, that gentleman had actions now pending for assaults committed upon him by officers of the prison in which he was incarcerated. The Learned Gentleman then proceeded to cross-examine the tipstaff and the Queen's Bench officer as to whether they were not influenced by ill-feelings against Mr. Herring to adopt the present proceedings against the defendant. The officers, how ever, denied that such was the fact, and Mr. Parry was about to call forward the witnesses for the defence, when The MAGISTRATE suggested, that as a case of common assault was made out against the defendant, he should therefore adjudge her to enter into her own recognisance of 201. to appear to answer the charge at the sessions, that when the case was regularly before a jury the de fendant could then have all the advantage of her wit nesses' testimony in her behalf. The magistrate's suggestion was agreed to by Mr. Parry, but his client expressed her disappointment, say ing that she was convinced, if her witnesses were heard, the magistrate would decide the case by dismissing it at once, without sending it before another tribunal. An application was afterwards made by Mr. Sturgeon, ou the behalf of Mr. Herring, calling upon the magis trate to compel the two complainants to enter into bail to keep the peace, as he was really afraid of them, and that they threw every obstacle in his way, and, by ths it conduct. tried to persecute him in every possible way. Mr. SECKER, however, refused the application, and Miss Nlitchell having entered into the required surety, was then discharged. WORSHIP-STREET. A young man, named Edward Blundell, was placed at the bar before Mr. Bingham, charged with creating a disturbance in the street, and assaulting police constable Montford, 210 K, in the execution of his duty. The constable stated, that while on duty in Globe lane, Mile-end, at half-past one o'clock that morning, the defendent passed by in company of several other persons, one of whom accused him of improper conduct with a woman, and asked him if he considered that to be his duly. He desired them to go home and not create a dis turbance. when one of the party uttered an exclamation " to give it him," and the defendant immediately struck him a violent blow, and knocked him down, in which position he was also kicked by one of them. On re • covering his feet he drew out his truncheon to defend himself, and the defendant ran off, but was ultimately captured, and, after considerable resistance, conveyed to the station. When called upon for his answer, the defendant em phatically denied the charge, and stated that he had nu merous witnesses in attendance who would prove that, having detected the policeman in an act of gross impro priety, and threatened to report him, he forestalled their intention by taking him into custody, in the hope of escap ing the consequences of his own misconduct. The defendant then called his sister-in-law, Mrs. Isa bella Blundell, the wife of a plumber in Chester-place, Bethnal-green, who stated, that after spending the evening with a family party, she was returning ; home with several of her relatives, and was about to bid them good night within a few doors of her own residence, when they heard voices down a dark entry adjoining. On looking down the court she directed her husband's attention to the constable and a woman, who were stand ing there, and observed to her husband, that it was a po liceman; on which the first witness instantly turned round, and, adjusting his dress, which was in a disordered state, asked her what business it was of hers, if he were a policeman, and, assailing her with a most infamous epithet, told her he would serve her in the same way. Her brother-in-law then intimated to the constable that he should wait until the sergeant came up, in order to point out the woman to him, when the woman instantly ' darted out of the entry and disappeared. They then told him that they should take his number and report him to his superiors, when the officer immediately pulled out his truncheon, and after flourishing it about like a madman, made a rush at her sister-in-law, who had just come out with an infant in her arms to learn the cause of the uproar, and knocked her and the child down with such violence, that after trampling upon them he over balanced himself, and fell forward upon his hands. On recovering his feet the constable, who appeared to he in a state of great excitement, then commenced springing his rattle, and on the arrival of another officer charged the defendant with assaulting him, and he was forthwith carried off to the station house. Both the infant and its mother had sustained great injury from the violence to which they had been subjected, and the latter, who had been confined to her bed nearly ever since, was unable to attend and give evidence. John Blundell, the husband of the last witness, and George Delaforce, the defendant's brother-in-law, de scribed the transaction in similar terms to those of the last witness, and positively denied that the defendant, or any of the party, had either assaulted the officer or offered him any other provocation than threatening to report him for using such gross language to their female relative when she directed their attention to the im proper conduct of their accuser. On being asked by the magistrate if he wished to offer any remarks in reference to the inculpatory statements he had just heard, the constable declared that he had not been in company with any woman at the time spoken of, and that the whole of the testimony against him was entirely false. In reply to the magistrate it was stated that the officer was a married man, and had always been considered a steady one, but that he had only been about nine or ten months in the force ; and Mr. BINGFIAM, without any observation, immediately ordered the defendant to be discharged. HAMMERSMITH. Francis Smith, an Irishman, wai brought up for fina, examination before Mr. T. Paynter, the sitting magis trate, on a charge of having stabbed with intent to mur der another Irishman named Redmond Rory. The evidence taken at the previous examinations in the case has already appeared in The Sun. The offence was committed on the night of Sunday, the 27th of June, 1841, in Penning's-buildings, a colony of Irish in the High-street, Kensington ; immediately after which the prisoner absconded. He was now fully committed to Newgate to take his trial on the charge. THE lIADDINGTON BURGHS.-011 Friday last it was officially announced in Haddington, that at the first general election the opponent to Mr. Balfour of Whit tingham, the present representative of that district of burgh; is to be either Lord John Hay, brother to the Marquis of Tweeddale, or Lord Melgund, eldest son of the Earl of Minto.—Ross-shire Advertiser. IMPORTATION OF VENlSON.—Venison, imported whole from Hamburgh, was offering in Hull shambles on Tuesday at 6d. per lb. for foreparts, and is. for haunches. MARKET NEWS—(YESTERDAY.) conahr-Exciusava E. Thomas Whitehall, whose head scarcely could 'be seen ' Although the arrivals cf English Wheat since Monday above the bar, and who stated his age to be only 15 have been moderately good, the show of samples of that article years, was charged with robbing his e:npl o yer. M r . here, this morning, was small. The demand, therefore, Thomas Dobell, linendraper, 38. r-elther - lane, Holborn, . was very steady, at fully the improved currencies obtained Police•constable 153 N stated that last night about . o ff n last market- day, and at which a good clearance was twelve o'clock as he was passing the door of a brothel n eevcetretdh.elesTshtehisaaalute for yr it was free f _ breign Wheat was good; o rm,iLt extreme doio in Henrietta-street, Shoreditch, he saw the prisoner , In Corn under locknexttonothig was ho had a large bundle with him, standing inside , talking high pretensions of the importers. Maltingg'aningto the v. grinding to a female. , Discovering him to be an apprentice of Batley was quite as dear, with a steady inquiry. In Malt, Mr. Dobell's, he went up and asked him what he was only a moderate business was Join; at late rates. Oats, doing in such a place at that hour, and also what he had Beans, Peas, and Flour supported previous figures. in the bundle. The prisoner replied that he was taking • ARRIVALS. the parcel to a lady at Lansdown-terrace, but not be- Wheat. Barley. En - ril h Having the story the constable took him back to Mr. Eri : h s .. :: :: :' 1,410 qrs. 7$Q 0 qrs. Dobell, when the property was found to have been stolen Forei g n .....: 50 4 , 110 from the stock. Malt, qrs. Mr. Dobell said he was knocked up out of his bed ViTITITECHAPEX. We had a full a t v h e e ra t ge i supply of Meat on sale to-day. that morning by the constable, who inquired after the toe was 3s heavy, on somewhat easier Generally speaking, apprentice, when he said he was in bed, as he had no Beef, from 2s 6d rat terms.6d; Mutton 3s 4d to 4.s 6d ; idea he was in the habit of getting up after all the rest Veal, 3s 4d to 4s 6d; and Pork, 3s 4d t o 4 s 8d per lb, by the had retired, and letting himself out with a second stre-t- carcase. door key, of which he had possessed himself. Mr. Dobell identified the property, which consisted of table cloths, napkins, and other articles, although he found that the private mark of the firm had been partly effaced I with some kind of acid. Oats Flour. 30 qrs. I 1,230 As 150 I -- 870 I RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS. BRISTOL, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK ExclitANGE.--Tlie sales are-Bristol and Exeter, Sl-Birmingham and Oxford Junction, 8% p.-Caledonian, New, 2/. 6s. M.-Leeds and Thirsk, New, 514-Midland, New, 31 14 -D it to, Birmingham and Derby, Cl, 3s. 9d.-Ditto, Bristol and Gloucester, 50-North Staftbrdshire, p.- West Riding Union, IX p. LIVERPOOL, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-Chester and Birken head, 201. Shares, % p.-Eastern Counties, 22: 1 4-Edinburgh and Glasgow, 76-Lancaster and Preston, Quarter Shares, 14'4-London and North-Western, 193 1 / 2 -Ditto, Quarters, New, 13 p.-Ditto, Fifths, 16 1 4 p.-Ditto, Quarters (G. J.), 20 3 / p.-Midland, New, 4% p.-North Union (B), 152- South-Eastern and Dover, New, No. 4,11 s. 3d. p.-York and Newcastle, Preference. 5% p.-York and Selby, Pre terenc,, 9% p.-Caledonian, Halves, 1 4 dis.-East Lanca shire, 5 p.-Ditto, New, No. 2, ex add. sh. 4 1 -l t p.-Great Grimsby and Sheffield, 4 dis.-Ditto, Quarters, 34 dis. - Ditto, Extension, 1 1 / dis.-Huddersfield Canal and Railway, ex int., 5 1 4 p.-Ditto, Extension, 1% p.-Leeds and Dews bury, 12 p.-Ditto, Branches (blue), 8 p.-Ditto, 'Extensions (green), 2 p.-Leeds and Thirsk, 21 dis.-Ditto, New, 1 4 dis. -Ambergate and Eastern Junction, % p.-Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Cheshire Junction, 1% p.-Birmingham and Oxford Junction, 6% p.-Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding, % dis.-Newry and Warrenpoint, 174 p.-North Staffordshire, 3% p.-North-Western, Bs. 9d. p.-Shrewsbury and Hereford, % dis.-Shrewsbury and Birmingham (A), 1 1 4 p.-West Riding Union; 1 1 / p.-Goole and Doncaster, % p.-Dutch Rhenish, 1 1 /s dis.-Demerara, 1 p.-Glasgow and Dumfries, par. MANCHESTER, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-Ambergate, Notting ham, and Boston, 3-16 p.- Churnet and Blythe, 1 4 dis.- Eastern Counties York Extension, 1 11-16 p.-Ea s t Lanca shire, 4% p.-Ditto, No. 1, New, 4 5-16 p.-Ditto, No. 2 (late Liverpool, Ormskirk, &c.), 4 1 4 p.-East Lincolnshire, 1,4 p.-Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding, 1 4 dis.-Great Grimsby and Sheffield Extension. 1% dis.-Great Grimsby and Dock Extension, 2% dis.-Huddersfield and Manchester Railway and Canal, 5% p.-Ditto, Thirds, 1 3 / 4 p.-Leeds, Dewsbury, and Manchester, 12 3 / .p.-Ditto, Branches (blue), 7 1 / p.-Ditto, Extension (green), 1% p.-Liverpool, Man chester, and Newcastle Junction, 1 4 dis.-London, Man chester, and Birmingham, 74-Ditto, Quarters (C), p. -London and York, 5-16 dis.-Manchester and Leeds, Fifths, 5 p.-Manchester, Midland, and Grimsby, 21s. dis.- .danchester and Southampton, 1 ,4 dis.-North Staffordshire, 3 9-16 p.-North-Western, 9-16 p.-Oldham Alliance, 1 1-16 p.-Preston and Wyre, 33%-Scottish Midland, 1 p. -Sheffie:d and Manchester, Quarters, No. 3, v i dis.- Shrewsbury and Herefordshire, 7s. dis.-Shropshire Union, 7-16 dk-South Staffordshire _Junction, 15-16 p.-West Riding Union, 1% p.-Wharfdele (late North-Eastern), % dis.-York and Carlisle, 1% p. LEEDS, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-East Lancashire, No. 1, New, 4% c. p.-Ditto, No. 2 (late Liverpool, Ormskirk, &c.), 4 p.-East and West Yorkshire, 15s. dis.-Hudders field and Manchester, 5% p.-Huddersfield and Sheffield, p.-Leeds and Dewsbury, 12% p.-Ditto, Branches, 73 / 4 p.-Ditto, Extensions, 1% p.-Leeds and Thirsk, 1% dis.- Ditto, New, 2s. 6d. dis.-Malton and Driffield Junction, 20s. p.-Manchester and Leeds, 10.-North British, Thirds, 535. 6.1. p.-Ditto, Quarters (late Ca p rlisle Branch), 2% p.-Ditto, Extensions (scrip), 20s. p.-North Staffordshire, 3% p.- York and Newcastle, Preference, 4% p.-Leicester and Bed ford, 6s. dis.-North-Western, Bs. p.-Sheffield, Rotherham, and Goole, 2s. 6d. p.-Shropshire Union, 10s. dis.-West Riding Union, 31. 12s. SHEFFIELD, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-Ambergate, Notting ham, and Boston, % p. -Great Grimsby and Sheffield, 3% dis.-North Staffordshire, 3% dis.-North-Western, Bs. 6d. p.--Sheffield and Lincoln, 16s. dis.-Manchester, Sheffield, and Midland, 21. Bs. dis.-South Yorkshire Coal Railway, % dis. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Nov. 25. The Right lion. Charles Buller, M.P.. was this tnorr ing called within the bar as one of the Queen's Counsel RE lIEMSWORTH. The defendant. who bad been attached for contempt in refusing to deliver up certain wine warrants, in com pliance with an award which had been made an order of Court, was this morning brought up for judgment. The LORD CHIEF Jusuce said the present case came before the Court on the report of the Master, in which the defendant was taken up on an attachment for a contempt of Court. With regard to the interrogations on which that attachment proceeded, it was shown that the defendant, formerly the plaintiff in the case, out of which the present proceeding had arisen, had been in repeated instances guilty of a con tempt of this Court, acting on the advice, it would appear, that he could defeat the award the Court had previously ordered to be made. The defendant, how - ever, would find any attempt of his impotent to defeat the enforcement of the award, and that he was utterly mistaken in supposing the Court had not full power to vindicate its rules and orders. It was their determina tion to render the law effective in such cases as this as far as the Legislature had given them power to do so. Though it was to a certain extent uncertain whether the Court should fix a certain term of imprisonment, or order the confinement to be continued till the award, for the contempt of which the defendant was in custody, was fulfilled ; still they were strongly of opinion that any term of imprisonment they might order would not liberate the defendant from the contempt of the Court, but that he would still be liable to be brought up and committed for the same. The defendant was charged not with one act of comtempt, but for continued contempt, and any term of imprisonment would not ex punge the liability, which could only be removed by the completion of the award, or by the payment of the value of the wine, spirits, warrants, sic., with the costs incurred, Looking at all the facts of the case, the Court were of opinion that the defendant had possessed the means of completing the award, and his not doing so, but acting in continued contempt, called for no consideration on their parts. With the object, therefore, of vindicating the authority of the Court, and giving effect to such awards, protecting the civil right of the parties interested therein, the judgment on the defendent was, that he he imprisoned for a period of two years, or until such time as he bad paid the value of the property made in the award with the costs since incurred. _ _ _ The defendant was then removed in the custody of the officer of the Court. EDWARDS V. SIIAW. This was an action brought by an attorney resident at Birmingham against the plaintiff, as Vice-Chairman and provisional director of a railway company, for work and labour done on behalf of the said company. The action was to have been tried at the last Warwick assizes, but before the case came on, it was arranged between the parties that the bill of particulars should be amendei, so as to give the defendant credit for 5001., which he had paid. The action would then be for 3001., the balance alleged to be due. The defendant denied the liability, and through some mismanagement, which the plaintiff; in his affidavits, attributed to the neglect of the attorney of the former, the case as amended, was not entered in time for trial. A rule was moved this term, on behalf of the plaintiff, to change the venue to Middlesex, and to have the declaration and issue amended. Mr. Sergeant Byles and Mr. Mellor appeared this day against the rule ; Mr. Sergeant Channel fur it. Rule made absolute. JACKSON AND ANOTHER V. MAGNAY-HEREFORD AND MERTHYR TYDVIL RAILWAY. This was an action brought against Sir Wm. Magnay, as one of the board of management of this line of rail way, to recover for goods sold and delivered on its be half. SlL)rtly after the action was brought a note was sent from the company's attorney to the plaintiff's at torney, intimating that if a fresh bill was made out, with the costs incurred in bringing the action, the company xouli discharge the same. With this understanding the record %vas withdrawn, and now the defendant moved for a rule to enter a nonsuit on his behalf. Mr. Lush moved for the rule on a previous day, alleging that plaintiff was no party to the arrangement with the com pany, and that he denied his liability. Mr. White was heard to-day against the rule, and Mr. Lush in reply. The matter was arranged that the rule should be discharged on the plaintiff giving a peremptory under taking to proceed to trial in the next term, and the Court so ordered. SECONDARIES' COURT, Nor. 25. The whole of the cases this morning were undefended, chiefly on bills of exchange, and none were of the slightest public interest. The Learned SECONDARY said that much unnecessary trouble and expense was saved by the plaintiffs obtain ing ajudge'sorder on the defendants to admit their sig natures to bills, as in a great number of cases the de• NEW COURT. Thomas TVathins and John Hill were convicted of stealing rags to the value of 10s., from the warehouse of .John Beamish, the master of Hill. Watkins, who had been before convicted, was sen tenced to seven years' transportation ; and Ilill, who was believed to have fallen into the hands of an old thief. to six months' imprisonment. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. Ann Davis, an old offender, who had been already convicted about twenty times in this Court, was in dicted for stealing a quantity of meat, the property of Joseph Smart. Upon the prisoner being placed at the bar, the police constable, who had charge of the case, was not in at tendance, and the prisoner was consequently ordered to be discharged for want of evidence. The Learned ASSISTANT-JUDGE commented strongly upon the negligence of the constable, and ordered his recognisances to be estreated. Thlnias Monipmery, another well-known thief, was indicted for stealing a handkerchief, the property of some person unknown. Mr. O'BRIEN, who appeared on behalf of the prisoner, took an objection to the form of the indictment, on the ground that the property was described as belonging to some person unknown to the jurors, while in point of fact the depositions showed it to be the property of a person named Frederick Martin. The Learned ASSISTANT-JUDGE coincided in the ob jection. and remarked that this appeared to be a parti cularly lucky day for thieves and pickpockets, as it seemed fated that the more notorious they were the more likely they were to escape—no less than four of tho best known in the calendar having e*caped that day without even entering upon the merits of the charges against them. Elizabeth Beazeley was indicted for robbing her fur nished lodgings of a quantity of bed clothes and furni ture, the property of William Hales. The prisoner must have been carrying on an extensive system of plunder, not alone in the lodgings where she was detected, but also in other places, as upwards of seventy pawnbrokers' duplicates were found upon her when she was taken into custody. A verdict of guilty having been returned against the prisoner, she was sentenced to four months' imprison ment. J ame s Wilson, was indicted for stealing a quantity of metal piping, the property of Henry Murray, his master. It appeared that the prosecutor was an extensive plumber. The prisoner had been his foreman for three years. On Monday week he was observed by a police. man to enter the shop of a marine store dealer several times with a bundle, and information of the fact having been conveyed to the prosecutor, it was ascertained that the prisoner had stolen a quantity of lead, which he disposed of at the shop for about a quarter of its value. He was found guilty, and sentenced to six months' im prisonment with hard labour. DuNmow. TILE DODGE ARTFUL. Last week Mr. Valiance, the governor of the Dunmow Union Workhouse, discovered that the scales for weighing the paupers' bread had some clay fixed on the bottom of the weight side, so that each pauper had upwards of an ounce more bread delivered tee him than was allowed. On Friday, James Hatley was taken before the Rev. J. P. H. Chesshyre. and the offence being sworn to by one of the inmates as having been done by him, he was committed lbe a Express. JUPITER AND ills MOONS.—There most beautiful and interesting grouping of the moons of Jupiter on the evening of the 2d of November at nine o'clock, when all will appear to the eastward of their primary in rare and close companionship ; the second and fourth moon occupying a position nearly parallel with the belts, and once his diameter from his limb; the first and third parallel with his equator, and distant two and three diameters. Owing to the rapid and now op posite motion of the first and second satellites this con vocation of worlds will be of short duration, and the beautiful group will separate; but not as a distinguiihed lecturer has said " never to meet at the same time on the same side of their magnificent primary ;" but again, on the evening of Dec. 30, at 7h. 16m. mean time, as if by mutual concert, they congregate and occupy the opposite or western hemisphere of Jupiter, where in bold and beautiful relief they will exhibit the same triangular configuration as described on the 21. The belts of Jupiter, which for a series of years have exhibited marked inequalities of distinctness, this year are strong and well defined.—New Bedford (United States) Mer cury. _ _ THE LONDON CITY MlSSlON.—Tuesday evening the fourth annu a l meet i ng o f t h e mem b e rs of the North clergy London Auxili ary to t hi s A ssoc i a ti on wa s h e ld at the Music Hall andDih dsienv,etrhael other Rev. c E ig) Bic men Store -street, Bedford-square: The Re v. Lord Wriotesl e y R usse ll , M.A ., pres id e d, and was sup ported by th e R ev. Th omas M ort i mer , the Rev. W. R. keernstaend ge th,R n . tl C em . L eo ..Be l v,a r n o , m Es t q h . e , annual report it aeared that during the four years of its existence the auxiliary association had remitted to the parent society the sum of 1281. By the London City M;ssion 160 agents were employed, who devoted their whole time to the work of visiting the poor in th-ir own habitations. The report showed in detail that the church accommodation of the metropolis was only for 351,290 persons, and the chapel'accommodation 601,415, of a p,pulation of 2,103,279 p er sons. The report was adopted, and resolutio ns expressive of confidence in the mission, and pledging the meeting to its support, were passed. ROBBERY AFTER ATTENDING A FUNERAL. —George Day, a lime burner, was brought before the county ma gistrates at Rochester, on Monday, on a charge of hav ing robbed his uncle, John Day, of a silver watch and 295. in money. On Friday the prosecutor had been to the funeral of his brother, the father of the accused, and in the evening accompanied the prisoner to the Lower Bell public-house, on the Maidstone road, where they sat for some time drinking together. The prose cutor, stupified with liquor, fell asleep, and when he awoke, about half-past one o'clock in the morning, dis covered that he had been robbed. The next day the prisoner pawned the watch at Rochester, and afterwards disposed of the ticket ti another man, and the same day was taken into custody at the Nag's Head public-house. He was committed to Maidstone Gaol for trial at the next Quarter Sessions. HULL, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCHANGE. —To-day hut a small amount of business has been transacted, and though most of our quotations remain the same as yesterday, a few showed a downward tendency. North Staffords were in demand, and improved accordingly. The sales are—North British, Half Shares, 164 ex int.— Ditto. Quarters, 78s. 6d.— Dit to,:New Quarters ( scrip ), 19s. 64. p.—Yoi k and Newcastle, Preference, 4 3 / 4 p.—Blackburn, Cli theroe, &c., IX—Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding, 3s. 64. dis.—lpswich and Bury, l% p.—Malton and Driffield Junction, 15s. p.—North-Western, Bs. p.—North Stafford.. shire, 31. Its. 3d. p.—Northern Counties Union, 24s.—Leices ter and Birmingham, 3s. NEWCASTLE-UPON-TYNE, NOVEMBER 24. _ STOCK EXCRANGE.—The sales are—Leeds and Thirsk, New, 3s. 6d. dis.—Newcastle and Berwick, 14 p.—North British, Thirds, 2% p.—North-Western, 12s. p.—North Stafford shire, 3/. 6s. 3d. p.—West Riding Union, 383. p. YORK, NOVEMBER 24. STOCK EXCEANOE.—The sales are—Direct Northern, 2 Great North of England, 236—Ipswich and Bury, Exten sion (Norwich), 2J—London and York, VA—Newcastle and Berwick, 33 7 / B —North British, Half Shares, 1 / 8 —Ditto, Extension, IL 12s.—North Staffordshire, 51 12s.—North- Western. PA—Sheffield, Rotherham, &c. ' 3/. Is. 6d.—West Riding Union, 33p —York and Newcastle, New, 12 1 ,( ex new —Ditto, Preference, 6%—York and North Midland, Prefer ence, 111 A. EDINI3URGII, NOVEMBER 23. STOCt EXCHANGE.-The ;ales are-Aberdeen, 191.-Air drie and Bathgate, 41. Bs.-Arbroath and Forfar, 281-Ditto, Halves, 151. 55.-Ayr and Galloway, 1/. Bs. 6d.-British and Irish Union, 2/. U.-Caledonian 23/. 153.-Ditto, New, 2!. 75.-Caledonian and Dumbartonshire, V. 55.-Clydesdale Junction, 341.-Direct Northern, 11. 195.-Dundee and Ar.. broath, 401.-Ditto, New, 271.-Dundee and Perth, 251.- East of Fife, 11. 9s. 6d.-Edinburgh and Bathgate, 2/. 155.- Edinburgh and Glasgow, 761-Ditto, Halves, 21/. 10s.- Ditto, Quarters, 191-Edinburgh, Leith, and Granton, 22/.- Ditto, Preference, 231.-Edinburgh and Northern, 151.-Ditto, Newport, 3/. 165.-Edinburgh and Perth, 11. 145.-Glasgow and Ayrshire, 691.-Ditto, New Stock, 381-Ditto Quar ters, 17/. 7s. 6d.-Ditto, Halves, BL-Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlisle, 2/. lls.-Glasgow and Dundee Junction, 1/. 16s. -Glasgow and Garnkirk, 411.-Glasgow and Greenock, 161 12s. 6d.-Ditto New, 81 55.-Ditto, Preference, 8/. 55.- Great North of Scotland, 1/. IN.-Great Western, 136/.- London and York, 2/. 7s. 6d.-Newcastle and Berwick, 34/. 155.-North British, 37/. 155.-Ditto, Halves, 17/-Ditto, Quarters, 3!. 145.-Ditto, ditto, New, scrip, 11. 128.--Ditto, Fifths, 71. 10s.-Scottish Central, 191. 10s.-Ditto, New, Mt -Scottish Midland, 131 10s.-Scottish Grand Junction, 155.-Stirling and Dunfermline, 11. 10s. GLASGOW, NOVEMBER 23. STOCK ExcmittGE.-The sales are-Aberdeen, 181.-Ayr and Galloway, 28s. 6d.-Caledonian, New, 45 5. 6d.-Cale donian arid bumbartonshire, 38s. 6d.-Direct Bombay and Madras, 7s. 6d.-Dundee and Arbroath, 401- Dundee and Perth. New, 101.-East Indian Railway, 123.-Edinburgh and Glasgow, Quarters, 20/. 18s.-Edinburgh and Northern, 11.-G!asgow General Terminus, IDA -Glasgow, Kilmar nock, and Ayr, Halves, 71. 19a.-Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlisle, 51s. 6d.-Glasgow and Greenock, 8 4--Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ardrossan, 325.-Glasgow, Airdri e , an d Monklaud Junction, '425.-Great North of Scotland, 395.- Great Southern of Madras, 9s. 3 d.-Manchester and South. ampton, 265. 6d.-Midland, Halves, 6 5 A-North British, New Quarters (scrip), 335.-York and Newcastle, Prefer: ewe, 7%. NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. PORTSMOJTII, Nov. 24.—The Admiralty have or dered the Retribution steam-frigate to be tried under steam by the officers of the dockyard, to ascertain, now she is light, where the weakness in her construction pre vails, and what is the cause of the very extraordinary and dangerous rolling motion which always takes place when she is at sea. Messrs. Maudsley and Field, the contractors, who made her engines and machinery, have been informed that their work has been executed ac cording to the agreement, and it is now the object of the Admiralty to find out why the Retribution is not fit to be trusted at sea. The inquiry on board the Emerald cutter relating to the catastrophe which happened to her by running down a sloop, has been made, and terminated by a full and satisfactory report that no blame was attributed to any one on board her. Her defects will be made good in a few days. The Recruit iron brig, now in dock at Devonport, has been pronounced to be an unsafe vessel as a man-of-war, rigged . and sto we d as s h e i s at present. To render her f i t tor a packet it will be necessary to reduce her masts and yards, land her guns and ammunition, and add twenty tons of sheet lead as ballast. On her passage from Ma deira to Plymouth she was very nearly swamped, having got stern way in a gale of wind. Part of her hammock nettings were washed away. From her buoyancy the most particular attention is obliged to be constantly paid to her helm and steerage. It is quite evident that neither brigs nor steamers, constructed of iron, are safe vends as men•of-war. The Polyphemus steamer is to have her defects made good at this port, and to be taken in hand immediately. When she quitted Carthagena, her Ma jesty's frigate Spartan was lying there with the Van guard. The Penguin packet, from the Brazils, has brought accounts of the departure of Commodore Sir Chas. Hotham, K.C.8., in the Devastation, for his command at the Island of Ascension; and of the arrival at Rio Janeiro, in two vessels freighted for the purpose, of the officers and crew of her Majesty's late brig Osprey, wrecked on the coast of New Zealand. They are ordered home for an inquiry by court-martial to take place. Woo',Amu, Nov. 24.—The "Eolus store-ship was towed down the river on Saturday, on her way to Ply mouth and the west coast of Scotland, with meal for the inhabitants. Commodore Sir J. Gordon Bremer, K.C.B. and K.C.H., arrived at Woolwich dockyard at three o'clock P.M. to day, and was received by Rear-Admiral Sir Francis A. Collier, Knt., C.B. and K.C.H., Commander Smith, of the William and Mary yacht, and the autho rities of the yard. At the time of the arrival of the Gallant Commodore, Sir Francis Collier, Sir Thomas Hasting, Knt., Rear-Admiral Sir Ch as . apier, Lieute nant-Colonel Dundas, C. 8., of the foundry department of the Royal Arsenal, and Captain Dalyell, of Green wich Hospital, were on board the Sidon, with Captain Henderson, C. 8., and on landing were introduced to the Commodore. On Friday morning last the early railway train between Kendal and Latica• ter ran over and killed a fine black cat, which was crossing the line with a mouse, and was too intent upon her prey to notice the approach of the engine. The cat was afterwards found completely cut in two, with the mouse firmly fixed between her teeth.—Carlisle Patriot, SPENCER'S CHINESE CHINESE LIQUID HAIR DO The thousands of individuals who for upwards years have used this celebrated liquid, pronounce it to be the ma article extant which effectually changes, in a few minutes, red of grey hair, whiskers, moustaches, 80., to a dark brow❑ or bile , without trouble (by simply combing it through the hair), and 11 . 1; duces by of twelq one application a pleasing and permanent change ; so u __, can be incontestibly proved, that while many dyes tend to deem the hair by their pernicious properties and dangerous process of ar rlication, that this article promotes the growth of hair, nourishil_li the roots till the latest period of life. Price 3s. Gd., 65., and IN per bottle. Fl e idgate l To be had of the Proprietors, 29, Nottingham -place, street, Whitechapel-road, London ; also of Mr. Johnstone, 68, Cal: bill ; Butler, 4, Cheapside ;Trout, 229, Strand ; Sanger, 150, OxfOru,. street; Barclay, Farringdon-street ; Atkinson, 24, Old Bens ° Finnig i , street; Hooper, 43, King William-street, London bridge ; 51113 m-street, Bath ; Elmore, Bull-street, Birmingham; sod°f ens Per:tuners and Medicine Vendors in town and country. Seat any part of the Idngdom by receiving a remittance, pest-Pai. 0 Please to ask for " Spencer and Co.'s Chinese Liquid Hall Ms' Observe, the Proprietor's address is on the wrapper. WORKS ObyneßsOunußE:gT e.Ta.,..h.flll,LiVuTcttWolL.L.. 4314-11)4,31•01'"'S. 446 N SINGLE and MAR ItiED LIFE (An Original Medical History., CONTENTS: traffit-3° Analysis of the Affections —Early Conventional Res . e __,.„, direction—Marital Anticipations and Realities —Laws ofeluaci.n..",4 Maternal Influenee—Phevomena of Gestation —On Int i i_r,'":„. Infertile Unions—lncougruous Alliances —Late Marr!.!gese..4o,, Matches—Curiosities of Twenty-three Years' Medical 11,1 P tc. &c. 2. fo FRI On CHASTITY and its INNGEMENTS (An Essay r 1846.) "Of human ills and frailties I discourse, ... Those taught by nature, and by art acqui k een. lO T Thf he rie l . In kindly spirit, herein counsel's giv'n. _ ~s ui. , , How health, how hope, how happiness is . Contents :3. ionenf young l c y ° a n e , and the i id 'di gentle , i a u n u d t e die i rh :P:°,:nu maturedtis'l: t il d s . good night's rest, a clear head, aud a contented rnindofbe osk __. W 0 W H AT wit to h t D e o u l esEtuAreT Tabl es,per fect B oirNlLCussontrit and o p: A l a , N i n r :t s a l .: u I. I r.t...lifa ~DI servanee of the instructions herein containeZ the fee ble eal Touchy deuce e, even to the most shattered constitution.,.ololll greatestpernTioloe we m eeh lifeuallotted amount o f thee i physicalto man. h a tt very delicate import, as their titles implY, wil l These interesting little volumes, although beari n g uP1 . ) .1 et /0 3ei. silitio healthed live f—What threescore hTietarsdriannka, t w o n i. lt ii : blecti happiness, and reach in e _ curable and general utility, for they tell ef matters ei°Yeu,_ll,l7o.l-111,clore's i titre able t" understand ought to know, but which 'I A Witt these enlightened times. except that quality Prun tillgs e hanuels, Is at a ver discoun t. ..... tro ti l °l questionab In the exposition hereby offere d o f the terrible till now' Ina',, gis ~ nature, if human disappointments and their skier way relir.wiicis_.; contended that every r..der shall become his or e po ''''' n 'to; 7 0 any more than their own lawyer', 1•--ft. II IS insi ste d utton, is sheuld know the simple principles •I' env ova organiz, __, k ol ci whereby our existence and the issue thereof in their Se er i 7 o l,-id _s!, states depend, the duties that are expected of us in fu!,„ l ta/P . capacities in the family circle, and the terms on which the t • rel_,lol. happiness of the present and future race of alankll2,d„,,,i l i bAl f inli ,i '' „ine s wheißalthytihn such tW il le l otl attainmentn found o to f a n a b l d l e ; winbhiyochur 150wwureepf----7-)inlirul'-iirilisl our duty to ourselves, we secure the like a e T ad anni vs enntagt .. he i;; l: e : s n + lcul i__A l.:' : 4oi:l to follow, and finally by the cultivation if our consistent with degenerate health, the mind as h i nes tile " be exalted to the summit of perfection, as bol t ' ec° .., fri_ t t' of God's creations. , „ of his 0- 0 , The author's justification for this seeming en t "„,'' ;Ist he „A, the hags, and the avowal of their integrity of purPose, 'tee by their perusal—his accredited qualifications gni4 la, topics broached involve his legitimate study sni p C . 11 1411' ...ill; ' r To be had of Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-r cern. _, te „ „ n 3v, „,,iles , Fleet-street ; Hannay, 63, Oxford- street ; , i a " 'et l' tilos' ~t stre o direct from the Author IO Ar. le-place Ilege - , - „ - ~.i a . „,1 - 4 1 ;fie. Great Marlboro 1t ' ; ' Y b ' dvise u r e ta n" - ~ u,g 1-s reet , who may e a _ .„ g a matters daily till Three, and in the Evenings fro" ,c,OC P Li E • 114 f' , fw3cell.lt. s the p.`:.,,, ot A POPULAR TREATISE en the HEALTH, - -F . jes , s l of the BODILY FUNCTIONS. pest (In s NINETEETII EDITION, price 25. 6d. ; Fr ee bf ' ~ The h b e an lo e s f s ul or .1' 1 / V C'fl4 tion THE SlLENTE7iliolVkstri. " A geu le2 . r ests W condary ~, ,0 ani . ; o es 5° gravings S ; Ym foll p o to w m ed s' PERRY and Co , Consulting Surgeons , betcliveeeu.:rbsepeurrrodf aiutuciodtinuvsiegepo:ule:urriegicisge.Liec,..,o-edt:trtirtce.,. prafiple are fully pointed eat. . $1 g, A ; ,e, Pahl' * street,tpretreneTihmee The CORDIAL s qsta a c,e n rpoudil and 3i , I IR: tshed by the Authors, and may be„t:n.l 46, L c: 0/' l.°P*. Sold by Stra stree •t , Purki s, Compton.street Soho • Hannay an. ~„ srs Part I. of this Work is particularly addressed I .l , ti fesrf t jo is yagabler;),d. oef Part 11. treats perspicuousls upon atkOSS fOrtlig upon th , :m in their how numbers who neglect to obtain , comps -1 ec`" - t° di ,- nit' ties arising ssirm3seDifyofn:::::,prfAn ic e nyeeft , r faLoolvoik yearsr p:reernmpßea e n e: etl , iAe,tnaEi i otrica, Si ,afcliddPhi secret Matrimonial secondary aFis e gte : :::, stsbe,etaao: t t sefn e nnnteu r dodi , aar - o r snlacr, o 3udilitm L n a ust,:i . s : ae3nina ; ' ,o onriigi address du. toi ail, ° Bpfrg o o n e et. . ~n lee.i. si: vial . , ctes, 111 _ , r 5. t .:...1 thA , ;$0:::_e t 1 i t ee cd h cdo, ,tet. e cstlii i i ae, ei t ro:‘ ,po 5: 1 : :. , 0 : 1. on eddi;:ei, d,o, ,feco i . . i c er;fLp fi cosi i iti , I :,r,l the. The Five- pound the cure of nervous and sexual debilit - irregular"gbits- a t ' n ui ereal contamination, scurvy, al. -e, The CONCENTRATED DETERSIVE ,o ';,. til Pf 0 1 ,, syphilitic remedy for searching out and purif) l ” . ..- e r ''' 'it ; casesex m ce a s y se b s e , ti asiurlst,_,„o„,...„,sairrolo jeittly; anent, and those painful affections arising fr° ll:is' id secondary symptoms, and all eruptionSoft he 41, "' 0.• .. is' and 335. per bottle. r ice .-i r itilr',' PERRY'S PUR Ben fee, if by Letter, IFYING SPECIFIC PILLS. ~P ter s hiu jras' and 11 e. per box. are the most effectual re out ''.- i lianunation, irritation of the bladder, SO., ss e "'°*. business. o tsil a f c 13en c4 blotches on the hes.. oi l 0 ;1 res A ai Censalta cessary.i,i Messrs. Perry are in daily attendenesepeen fly rners-street, Oxford-street, London, fr . . d ani ,oells' e till eight; and en Sundays from eleven u. '' H. A minute 0 tbeir,,,, too AS P -------10VT11 THE SECRET INFIRMITIES OP f r,fos , o lio MATURITY. (1/C' t e loP e l.,e` pl. . c .D E! , .0 1 / 30.- - WITH TWENTY-FIVE COLOUR. 01 - 4 4 g, Just published, Twentieth Thousand, In a t e d i n ro- dill 2s. 64., or post paid, to any address, for 3 5 . ' A iffelo direct from the Author's residence. s gedi eD' ,l3 l,° oif .Q,., ELF. PRESERVATION -ci. , v „th s' AuW e ef Li on the Secret Infirmities and Disorder , ?'," e n t l l t ple ° ,leie; Illustrated with Twenty-five Coloured r l a ,,` e fte prod u ' ej - 11 0 ' 0 0 ,4 t r pth h eeeui s i O ,l i N olny, and Diseases of the UrniarY a r r ewi ction s !,, se` 1 0 0 0 explainingiirj Matriculated tetiy tr,hi e t Localh that eir . are and Constitutional various pr o structures , d uced in them, Ni: 0 ; nso::: i , . tTlr ye a bt, an b e 1 off..- , 0 di ; 0, 0 e I excesses. With Practical Observations on fee ." otb Member h h eEe os: e ti t: Memberß 3 , of 9,thSAMUELen.Bedford-street, on r i i L d O A' vit aEOS , n• 11 10 .. n: d rl Hall, London, &c., l ee . Apothecaries' ce‘ lir° ~ ~,, 11 1 , 1 „' ,• it, CONTENTS OP 221 E TREATISL.Atti , I, .. i :,,cf , , CHAPTER 1. On the Philosophy of Marriage , ~,,,i''' u tl Ye Gee e ,"erea . and° bligations, and on Infelicitous and linP l— . t • ' O 4 tlie, ids' CHAPTER 2. On the Anatomy and Physiology '',..firil i pp .' l,ll B Organs, their functions, structures, and secretion& P — ,,,Devi e 0 0 ,04 Mental and Physical Power are dependant upon til e . ," efl c- IVe c f - tlis —CHAPTER 3. On Solitary Habits; their vane` 0,5 i '' a t) Animal Economy ; the concealed cause of Debility ' , ,, e 0. 11 ` o f 1 , 0 of the Sfoniach; Lungs, and Brain, and general. or jere l ves o oa Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On the Secret V i to' ji' 0. and Matdrity, and the Treatment of Nervous fted. le i i l li ose rticg Mental Debility, and Premature Decay.—CrtAr_T'c's, " the Disorder? arising from indiscriminate 1%.,, „oil', (Beet, Strictures, and other Diseases of the Vretb 4 "" ,Df 4 ,, o ILI REvirive of WORK. „, o ell. 0 0 "The author of this sinoular and talented wor k ibis e f olll e ed' fled medical man, who has ' evidently had consider ' tos..o,bleot the trr Atment of the various disorders arising 41 ' 0 107 1 0 4 `;,,isl frailties of early indiscretion. The engraving, ar ce ese ,, ,,,, it 4 P e ., sr dacitti°asn'sociElinnetb";e:ritb,ccoliooio a by salutarydemonstratingw arning ycoountsi andenc es ot ,! • e •' s it 1 ' many questions may be satisfactorily repri _ 4 oeo r ,',e peal, eves to the most confidential friend. --- _,.'.'i Dis '''.; cud ` .1 4 r riatur,rlJi;at ,pa Published by the Author, and may be b"" 'llsoo'loord o ;fee'' from Kent and Richards, 52, Paternoster-son' , I,l ll ' Oxford-street, Starle, Tichborne-street, 4 2, , u , ii . e D-str ee , i d fie, Leadenhall-street, London; Newton, ii, e — ifF , L tliil d ''' and by all Booksellers. ~,, 01 1 1 u cc i ; 00' At Home for Consultation daily, froln ie ' — ;;PSY SF- ir Five till Eight ; and all letters immedig t ;%..S lll the fee of IL, for advice, &c...-9 impFo.." SQUARE. LONDON bi l r e tsu Lord runp p to R Brougham EEsnslol asnd. left et 41% 1 ,,, ..-1.-- chi .- , DvCC'', t he Y ell' OF GAMBLING 4k r Bigit ei- bich 0, g v all of a letter from Italy.)—His Rof 3 ; , h , rum- tA vi t hs h - se o b r in i - g x t e a c b a le h s a h vi a n v g e h en ad ta e ii x e p d e o ri n en ni c s e n o l , h ors T her s d ei pmei bli o of Lucca, has by a royal ordinanot e ro t f "Iret e e ri , vember instant, suppressed all coin° w oe, 0 dukedom ; and has directed that t he of I thi P the Baths of Lucca for the c be converted into s p reading roo ° 017 111e ' l:11aseewell 66-4; P 4 10-r.; °l i ViareL:gio. . AO fllel itt eli [ADVERTISEMENT. j —DEAFNES.• . fr oert if P Id, VISION MILIEVED , No. 39, A.LHERM IS" „net. --sel A nc lefl er g• —Sent into the country free, bY post. is, o l P 6t Ile l e acoustic tubes, for relief of extreme then e are .. ,,,jle ~cll,. inserted n the ear cannot be perceived by ; 10 . e the !' o fee; eoP t , they are entirely different from all others, An" Qu artei tio el' feo ing instruments constructed —measuring 0111 Y s te d in t o cili t i;c o° ,lf their widest part ; they may be securely adjii:a_ 0 1 ,„ De „es A served. an removed therefrom with as reat o 7 .l D e :. e rf: distinctly enabled i n a o t a o c join s i o n f iwnorgeneral e., congers what tn.: 4 ' l .'4y pr !. Pl y a" , uP'" Alr 1.D 5 —a thickening or contraction of which in 11,_ the u d, _ ii ,00, considered, a natural expansion of the caanvltYot..lineft'n:l:o'.l°ieir tially the cause of deafliess—and by their u_', 000_ 8 e fiS!` l ,f sation of singing noises in the ears is endire.L,. . r f e c; , e n proved hearing trumpets of every descrifr o 'i or e ile , P;icli ~.i ` roP„. t newly-invented spectacle lenses are place a t u d apes g o fightso 7e, either by day or candlelight, that everyll ._„ t Deco . e Dr, o tA A before the eyes is at once removed. distinct, so that the most aged defective 5.,F . " ai. and '' ,011 0 ,e ~ 'l , op) ,--, bee oc g intti o , ~.,,, brilliant, and is brought to its youthful, Ile:_'_ r g, oper A _„ilo'; ' l ll '.l Also the most powerful achromatic telesc p_ .. „, 0 ,e, vLipe fi ef le ' microscopes. Caution—Messrs. S. and li.,.So!Torns ovine P"..0 1. not in any way connected with a person ofthese f h untloow ir Immediate neighbourhood. nor in any part 0 . h o at i 4 v(0 0 a mistakes, be cautious, and observe —only to 0 P Daoro- Pu •co '0 tle-o ut s" 1 " o wu si street, Piccadilly, opposite the York Hotel. _.,... 0 ;no , 11 ,4 11 ' [ADVERTISEMENTICURE V. WAY'S PlLLs.—Mrs. Langley, residing at , o e _.,. e du ~,, e he pP , been suffering from dropsy for the last tw Yei7 t h 0,.., o f ! io g ; g ri e oe o s v h e e r hadt;hboeweielytearp,pebdy slievvienig*aloth iimscosi i , do 7 ebl , lei & s P o l ,i r w i t o j e y el t ; ; )L . c li o e or ' e food, abstaining fr om the use of all vog L A u t seYgi,,,ol).o4jl p/ lif t e ,c; tiale 3 11 ,,eroa ~i i i/ dropsical, would do well to take from time v ,.,,,, e ii d!!„„i6ta, ' pe cou rc r e s: tly of e. H r o e l d io . Holloway's aiceelseabtrattheed t p u i r l i lf ofofr af wiic , fre!l tie of , 0 00 generating medicine, thereby —Sold by . Rondos toms attending this critical period . y 4, str ew, Profe , lsor Holloway's Establishment, 244, speedily remo .I_lL. all drut...j. 07 ".".."""............ .t1 0 e r 2 a 2 s d on i o n afn st ds . Jocelyn, W O es n t In th d e ies l , 7 t t h h e wife of the Rev. IlolCirantiggo Virt(liaSt;cle4llSY of a daughter. On the 13th • lad -of inst., at the Downes , Vines VD ), Andrew Saunders, Esq ,of a daughter. ~, Ire. theolliathe 19th inst., at Kilmore, near Alonagbalt: '- 4, dy of Captain H. Schomberg, R.N., of a sl sci. _ iortr On 0 _ the 21st inst., the wife of J. C. Atkinson . 1- ' ' it, &street, the flse- jtlceteo: f Romney-terrace, Westminster, of a daughter., , e so. On the 21st inst at E ing-place, the lady ot v" taiti Sale, of a st• 11 b " PP f CO" 1 - orn son. On the wif O. Ar 2lst inst., in Susses-square, the ,j, ooraom, of a son. f r ig , On st PhD the 22d inst., at Wharncliffe-terrace. • the wife of Burton Archerburton, of a aughter. r SoutbsniPtolit °SI ,ehpeitinern:BaSbietßarr:lffha.gotp. MARRIED. CYleerl-BCF;fili On the 20th inst., at St• George-the-gartyr,,_oo, the Rev. J. A. Coombe, Fellow of St. John 6 td (j _ i h s+o oo6 bridge, and hector of Alburgh, Norfolk-, to Saw' daughter of J. E. Wilson, Esq. t ye () Gu the 18th h inst., at Cathcart ri.ouse, near 80 hßegiment. DIED. GlAse 0 5 ' Lady t Augusta Indies, Lieutenant George Carnaby Robe so Deg, 11;jestil tot September last, 9- ahet n of loafr o_ dn i a : pE t t l as i n.2,oC:.ll.l3lFile:scatd.c.,:eanatallSd7a,.lizt vr . s o o.d, near 1 1 5 4134 e Wi fe gent, O Dg rie_ocoekintlii lijeleeuen2,w2lssttinisets.,t.C,talatrltehseYacteems, estecoony 22idEfeisiglosf.:.t:hga.eedRt vesaysi.s.tJooisl,ethieTti;ingsgrietr:r. oesi.dege: ltd,firos On the 22d inst in Queen-street, COW° EE ise3 u a. n n, o t o l rf le ut h2oe3llisaioinsnto..ra, IgAieondinssees, w i3 i r f i t o o f n , F a r g a e n d e s l 5i1.3.1313ett 'ply .l' gr' s ' Co'lle On the 23d inst., at the Royal irettinti., 1 1 ' 0 (1, 1 :;69 0 you'O'itio 0' -__ London: Printed a nd Published by vidtllll ljeStrur-112"4‘11. Strand. Printer, at The Bum Odlce of .- ddici ory 00 of the Savoy, ill till, COO' Yoraber 26, 1846,