The Sun. — London, England, 1812-06-24 00:00:00

Lord CASTI,,REAGH assured the Honourable Baronet, that all communications from Ameriea were attended to with that care which the itn portar •e of , the -subject required, and that: a list of all American. seamen in the service was obtained from the American Minister, for• the purpo:ie of adopting such steps as would be Satis factory. .Mr. PONS 713 Y declared that,, so far as be un derstood the Gatette, it was to him perfectly sa tisfactory"; if America should persist in unjust and unreasonah!e demands, though he had constantly opposed the o:ders in Council, his vote should not • be wanting to the enactment of those measures which might be 'neeesisary to the dignity and cha'- racter of the country - . - Mr. WHITBREAD expressed his heartfelt satis faction that the revocation had. taken place, and he had no doubt that it would be successful in pre venting a rupture between the two countries.. It was impossible, to notice the joy of the manufac turing districts , on.the present occasion-, without congratulating themselves on what had beep done. On returnihg'to their estates, they would find the people' quiet, peaceable, and employed. It was unnecessary to .pay any complimentto the manner in which his Honourable Friend (Mr. Brougham) had conducted the invcsti2-,ation—the country knew it .When one's own country was in the right on any disputed question, there could be little doubt as to the part which they ought and would adopt, .but he was unwilling to anticipate such a remit, and therefore should say nothing on it.: He hoped that the differences with America Would be immediately settled, and that some at tempt would be speedily made towards a peace with France. -The Orderfor a call of the House s on Thnrsday next was,then discharged. TITI-IF,.S IN IRELANp, - Mr. PARNELL rose to make his promised - mo tion on this subject. ..He began by observing, that- no. -fewer, than nine counties- had expressed, either. by petitions, or through Graiid Juries, the necessity of some alteration in the tithe system of lrelbnd. He was confident that a very general couviction prevailed of-its being a great grievance on -the lower orders of 'the country, and that the Clergy themselves, would be glad ,of some commu tation. The maienitude of the evil was admitted bv'the late Mr. - Perceaal himself, who had pro, neeted a Bill for an alteration in the tithe system, but who dropped it in consequence of supposed diflituities In Me. Pitt's speech -On the Union, that important authdrity confessed that tithes were a great practical evil in Irelanda• and from the zeal with which that speech was circulated by the Noble Lord opposite, itavas reasonable to ex pect that some arrangements, as to tithes, would have been the consequence of a Legislative Union. The tithe system was ,by no means the same - in .England as in Ireland. In the first place, the people who paid tithes he:e were of the same re ligion as the Clergy to whom they were paid.-- In Ireland the proportion of Protestants to the rest, of the population was as one to ten, comput- . ing the population according to Bushe, Chalmers, and Newenham, to be five millions. -With- this extraordinary fact before the House, it was very much to the credit of the Catholics, that they were not the petitioners against the tithe system. Their policy was not to ;rive offence, or to embar rass their great cause, by meddling with the affairs of the Church. The next difference between the tithe 'system here- and in Ireland, was - the unsettled rates in the latter. ,There was, in fact, no uniform system through the different counties; a great deal was left to the- - caprice of individuals in levying them, and much of the oppression under which the dandholder laboured was to be traced to th:s cause : The next difference was the Collec, tion. In England the farmer had recourse to' a jury, in case of dispute with the clergyman ; in Ireland, all such disputes were , settled by citations before an 'ecclesiastical jurisdiction. The Hon. Gentleman then quoted the case of a Mr. Battersby, a eleagyrnan, who made a new demand, - of What be called family-money, in his parish, and actually sold the kitchen pots of a po o r co tt a g er f or thi s family-money. A ,court of justice, however, O af aterwards disallowed the clergyman's claim, and prayed how unsettled was the . system on which .he . haled: every consideration, in fact, which be could give to the subject, convinced him more and more how necessary it was to relieve the lands older .11. Ireland froni the pressure of this system. His plan was to appoint Commissioners ,to compute the value of the tithes throughout Ireland, and then to substitute a county land-tax for them until lauds could be obtained for the , clergy.• He would therefore move, " that a Committee be appointed, early, in the next Ses kion, to take' into consideration the state of the law with respect to tithes-in Ireland." Mr. POLE said, he should not trouble the House at any considerable length, on the nresent occa sion : and he -hoped- that his Hon. friend would not think that be meant any disrespect towards him, if he did not again deliver nearly the same speech which he had delivered to "the House in the last session of Parliament. This he must do, if he-answered the speech of hiS -Hon. Friend, in which there was not one new argument, nor one topic which had not been over And over again An swered in that House. The Hon. Gentleman had done him the honour to make some reply to the observations which occurred to his (Mr., W's.) mind in the-course of the debate is the last session of Parliament There 'were, however, only one or two points of his Hon. Friend's speech to which he should direct bis attention. The Honourable Gentleman had - alluded, in the early part of his speech, to what he alleged his (Mr. W.'s) feelings to be, as expressed in that debate upon the subject of tithes.. He would meat to the Hon. Gentle man-'s memory what he did really say on that Oc casion. lie (Mr. W.) had stated, that When he first enteead into the corisideration of the subject -of tithes in Ireland, he had a communication With Perceval, and - other members a)f the 'Govern ment, upon -that subject, and that he (Mr. W.) bad deelareci - to the House, that if he could thiel or - discover any practicable _ mode for remedying the inconvenience alleged to exist in respect to tithes, he should feel himself to be the Most for tunate- man in liii Majesty's Government. " he (Mr. W.) stated : that aftce a full consideration of the question, he fOund that, in the first place, upon inquiry into the merits of the subject, that the gri&Vances alleged were by neemeans so great' as supposed ; and, in the second place, thl - it he found it impracticable, by any means which then presented t eniselves, or could be devised, to re medy the grievance, : ,without material injury to all parties. The House, he hoped, would bear in !mind, that, in the session before last, when the Honourable Gentleman brought forward a motion similar to this, that in concluding the speech which he (Mr.: `V.) made on that occasion, he declared that he would make it his, duty; in the Vacation before the last, to investigate the question com pletely, respecting Irish Tithes : and be then pledged himself to tome down to the House, in the last session of Parliament, prepared to propose a plan for ameliorating-the system of Tithcs in Ireland, or at least to state the grounds upon which his conviction -vas founded, that no. such plan could be properly enNrtained. When his Honourable Friend opened his speech in thelast Session, Which was the very same speech almost he had just now nowedelivered, he. felt himself calle I upon to state the grounds ,why he op posed the motion his Honourable Friend then made ; and the Hon. Gentleman most recollect, that in so doing, he had.kept- the pledge he het]. before given ; anil that he did go deliberately through the examinations of every system, and every plan proposed upon the subject of tithes in Ireland,- commencing with the plan of the Right Hon.; "Member for the City of Dublin (Mr. Grattan) proceedingnext-with the plan of his Han, Friend, then with •Lord andi af terwards with all the'varions plaos.eversuggested' for the alteration cf the system of tithes in Ireland, - and he 1111, on that occasion, humbly state, thet he thought that not oee Of those plans could have any, other effect than to aggravate the alleged,sul ferings of the lower orders of the people by eom- Telling,: them to :pay a greater propor!Lion.of Tithes - than they did at this moment. He (Mr. P.) Stated,. that when the system with respect . to Tithes was altered, itnvould'be calculated perhaps-for the be nefit of a few, but be manifestly inaurious to the many ; andhe thoughthe had proved that there _was no neW plan proposed,hich, if carried into execu tion, would not be found manifestly unjust in its principle, and in its operation . would make the burthen of Tithes injurious and insupportable to the great mass of landholders ip lreland e 2 In closing his speech, however, he had railed upon his Hon. Friend, after stating how very much.he felt interested in this question, to exert himself in the course of the recess,-and to.nse all the ener 7 gigs of his own ingenious- mind in deliberating and methodizing his thoughts ; and that he-(Mr. W. P.) pledged himself, if he brought in a- Bill founded upon any thing like an eligible plan, be would give his assistance in the fair and candid discussion of it ; and if commensurate with its object, that it should not want his support. — Now the Honourable Gentleman, after hav ing had frill twelve months' time .to deliberate on this subject ; after twelve months have elapsed since this statement . was made; he came clOwn, not with any practical measure, but repeated almost the very same speech with which the House had been before indulged, and closed - with the very identical motion he made in the last Session of Parliament. Now, under these circum stances, he (Mr. 'P.) should not,—because he thought it quite unnecessary, —go through the ar guments lie took the liberty of urging on thii question hist year : but, in point of couttesy, perhaps, he wes bound to make a few observa tions upon what the Hon. Gentleman had °tiered respecting the plan which he.conceived would af ford relief to ,the persons alleged to be aggrieved by the Tithing System_ in Ireland. Ile (Mr. P.) ,thought it necessary just to state what the conse quences would be if that measure were adopted, which the Right Hon, Gentleman seemed to think would be a remedy for the evils of which he com plained. The proposition of. the Hon. Gentle man Was, that there should be Commissioners ap pointed for valuing the livings of the Clergy of Ireland as they now stood ; and this he under stood to be the Hon. Gentlenian's proposition.— " I don't Wish to deprive the Clergy of Ireland of whit they now enjoy ; brut I wish to ascertain how, upon inquiry, I can remedy the evil com plained of,' without any injustice to them, and for the benefit of the people of • Ireland." But the first thing the HOn. Gentleman would do was this : he would call upon the Commissioners to value the present receipts of. the Clergy of Ire land. Now, he (Mr. P.) took upon hineseW to state this, that, upon the average, the Clergy of Ireland, in some districts of that country, do not receive more than one-twentieth of the produce of the land ; t and that, in almost all other parts, they did net receive more than one-thirtieth. rWe hope to he able to gli'e the remainder of Mr: W. Pole's Speech upon this important que,tion to-morrow.] Sir .TouN NEWPORT declared that •he had the authority of one of the oldeSt resident Clergymen in Ireland; to state, that if the Clergy were to collect their own tithes, they would , petition for leave to commute. He complained that the : promise held out to the poorer persons in that kingdom at the Union, had not been carried into 'effect. In order to shew the hardship which the peasants endure from the present mode ofcollecting tithe's, he read a letter from a Gentleman in the - county of Wexford, stating the case of a man named Murphy, who was compelled to pay a great in; crease, the Clergyman of the parish demanding nearly double. Another case-was that in which the Clergyman in New Ross gave notice to one of the parishion4s that he would not receive his tithes of potatoes till the whole was dug out of the .ground. By these Means this person's income was increased from 1000/. to 30001. per annum.--, The Right • Hon. Baronet recommended most strongly the necessity of adopting some measure which should give - relief to the poorer classes, and warmly supported the motion. Lord CASTLEREAGH entered his protest against the principles of legiSlation laid down by the Right Hon. Baronet. He maintained that the prOper mode of applying relief in any case where grevance 7. as stated, was for the Hon. Member who brought it under the consideration of Par. For the, Motion 36 This liament,. to point out a remedy. The Noble Lord deprecated the practice of stating insilated acts of What was deemed, oppresslon, as cruel to the individualand inArious to the public. interest. The Right Hon. Baronet would have' done his Letter . if he had brought the particular laws , within the 'view of the House; and submitted a motion for the repeal of the laws.' He denied that any particular pledge had 'been given . , by hint on the subject. He admitted that evils certainly do exist, but he could not suffer the property of the Church to be conshrered in an inferior light to any other species of property held under the Crown. At 'thetithe of the Union, much pains had been taken on the subject, but the difficulty which then Was presented arose front the objec-; tion tb interfere with the religious establishment, and its consequent pecuniary benefits. He had not. been able to discover any proposition.likelYto remove the cause of complaint, yet he was dis posed to give.his assistance to the Hon. Gentle man, or to any other person who would prOduce to Parljament a project, with a ViCNV to allay the. discontents upon the subject. Until then he must object to take the subject 'under consideration, and therefore must, vote a,. , ainst the motion. Mr. BA ZEIAM supported the motion, convinced that any remedy must be attended with less in venience than the evil Mr, M. FITZGERALD, adverting to what had fallen.from the Noble Lord; maintained that his Hon. Friend had made out a case sufficient to call upon the House to ,accede to the motion. He denied that there %vas any disposition to.enttench' upon the -recogniied rights of the Church. He enforced the necessity of.giving - some pledge, that the subject sliouid be considered during the re ceSs,.and of e.xtending to lreland the same laws which the f%; , wr in England. is under the prO tection'of, in i - e.spect tcohis.tithes, and which the unfortunate peuantry of the fortn,er country so much requite. • . SislITH declared: that he should be glad to-sec a total ; change in the principles of tithes, hut not without an ample - security to those who had property in theM. If-he cotOd state to - the 'Uouse the -instances of oppression of which he had heard and .read respectiofr, tithes in. Ireland, it would make the feelings of - EnglishMen revolt. Convinced that there 4vaS n 6 subject of greater importance to the _Empire, he should certainly support the inotioa. Mr. TIGHT asked, to whom were the,people of Ireland to look for redress bet to their Repre sentatives ? The grievailces with which the sys tem of tithes abounded were_acknowledged by all parties, and he could not therefore perceive any rational objection to the mition. Mr. WILBERFORCE was astonished at the diffi culty of obtaining information on the subject of the tithes in Ireland ; but it was evident that in many parts of that country the peasantry were much oppressed. It was a great advantage of the Union, that it brought the condition of the lower orders of the people of Ireland more completely under the contemplation and consideration of the Empire. Mr/PARNELL made a short reply ; after which the House divided-:- .Agaiast it. , 31) • . Majority On our re-adiriission to the Gallery, we found Sir-J NEWPOAT on .his - legs, adverting to the thirteen Reports from the Commissioners of Na tional Education in Ireland, and urging the ne cessity of a pledge an the part of Parliament, that they would at an early period enter into the con sideration of that most important question.. He moved three' Resolutions ; the first stating the importance of the subject—the second expressing high. approbation of the labours of the Commis sioners—the third cleairing that the I-louse of Commons would at the .coinmencement of the next Session proceed to carry into effect that great national work. Mr. W. POLE opposed the motion, on the ground that the fourteenth Report of the Com missioners, containing much valuable informa tion and opinion, was not yet quiteprepared ; when it was so, it-would go .to the Executive Government, who would prtpose: a plan accord ingly. Lord CASTLERiAGH trusted the Hon. Baronet would withdraw his Resolutions ; otherwise be should be compelled to move the previous clues . - tion on them. Sir J. NEWPORT', hOW#Wer, persevered. Mr. WILBgIiFoRbE said a few words against, and Mr. W. SMITH in favour of the motion ; after which, the previonequestion was - carried on all the Resolutions. Mr—LocKHART, postponed his motion respect ing the Marshalsea Court to Thursday. Mr. WHITBREAD postponed his "notion on the Toleration Act from to-tnorrow to, to-morrow se'nnig-ht. Lord CASTLEREAGH stated, that the subject Isms under the innnediate consideration of his Majesty's Government. . - Adjourned at half-past twelve 'o'clock. TRISH CATHOLIC.--All -Aggregate . Meeting of the Catholics of Ireland was held in Dublin on the lt3th inst. The object of this Meeting was -to receiye the report of the persons 'appointed to Manage the late Catbolic Petitions to parliament, and to present their Addresses to the. Prince Re gent. Several Resolutions tit ere passed, by - Which the Catholic Body continues to pledge itself to the pursuit of the , repeal of the-whole of the e disabilities.—CounsellOr O'Gorman begged it might be distinctly uddeistood; that any ra rangements or conditions which -might lie con— nected. with Canning's Motion in the House - of Commons, would have no in - Kan - ice on the con . - duct of the Catholics. of Ireland, as they were de termined to obtain their freedom uncondition ally. • (Loud applause.)-L-A Resolution was passed for calling another Aggregate Meeting, on Thurs day se'nnight, and that the Board, thus autho rised to prepare the Petitions, shOuld have the same leady for the cons,ideration of the Meeting on that 'day. A Gentleman named CORTY peformed on foot 28 miles in five / /lours and ten minutes, yester day, fur a wager of 100 guineas: PRICE OF STCC Rauh Stock, 216 3151 Navy '5 per Cent. shut LONDON rated b TIjON,!AS WOOD : ot . No : !35, Maden-line,_Cov \ ent 7 ganlen . ; and Publisb , ed -by WILLTAM ApIICiER SCRIPPS, South 11101 ton-street, Grocretiortsquaies FROM THE •LONDON GAZETTE, JUNE 23 Trar-('dice Jane, In consequence of the gall:xi:Au. displayed by the 2dl3.atta• lion of the 47th Regituent in the defence of Tariffaihis.Royak- Highness the Prince 'Reg•clit has been'pleased,' in the rtin,: and on the behalf of his Majesty, to approve of the word Tarifa" being borne upon. th e c o l ours ' and. appointnieut4 of the 47th Regiment. MILITARY PROMOTIONS. .111 fir. 23, 181'2. Ist Reg. - Dragoon Guards, ('apt. James B. Mimi, from the Regiment of Aletiron, to be Captain of a Troop, vice Her; ries',7 who exchanges. • Cornet R. Bakington to, be Lieute nant, by Purchase, riee'Delap, Promoted. in the Wegimeat. of Meuron. - 3d Regiment of Foet G:zards—David Baird, Gent. to be Ens'`,! sign, by purchase; Moorhouse . ' promoted.. • s sth Regiment of P:::)t---Captain Nieholas, Hamilton to be Ma-j . , jor, lice Ridge; action. 45th Ditto--Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel Hon..G.A. Chetwyni Stapylton, from the 6th Foot, to be Capt a i n o f,a C ompany vice For;ter, W h o . Menron's Regiment. —Captain W. L. Ferries, from the Dragoon Guards, to h e C a pt a i n o f a C ompany, vice Delapt who exchanges. COrsican Itan6crs.—Major A. Schummelketel to have permal neat rank in the Army. BRV_VET:—To be Liciitenant-COlonels in the Army, INT;t7oi John Bacon Harrison, of 50th Feet, 'Charles Cother, of list (Foot, and Edivard Currie, •of 90t4 Foot. To be - Majors the Army, Captains Charles Cornet ,Bacon, of the Gotif Foot, G. Hewett, of :lid Foal, and' He rman St apy l tou, o f both Foot. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. Richard Chafrey, Maudlin, Devonshire, clothier. Charles Cox Bartlett and John Burt, of Nortoii-dader-Harni-' den; Somersetshire, tininen. •BANKRUPTS.. 'Thomas Nightingale, Watli ii;-•street, London, Ware!' ou em to surrender June 27, July 4, at twelve, and August 4, at' . eleven, at Guildhall. Attorney, G. Adams, Old Jewry. John Newton;Stockport, Cheshire, grocer, July 3, at three, B;and August 4, at ele ven , a t the - Warren Bulkelevy Arms Inn, 'Stockport. Attorni e s, M essrs. Cooper andLowev Southampttm-bnittlings, Chanceiy-lane, London or Mr. , , Cheetham; Stockport. ' • John 'Mason, 'Liverpool; merchant,. &ay 15, 16, and August - 4, at, one, at the Globe Tavern, John-street, Liverpool Attnmies, Mesiirs. Cooper and Lowe, SouthawPion-huild. (lAm:cry-lane, London, or Messrs. Orred and Baine4, . Russell, Ipswich, Suffolk„ maltster, July 14, 15, auk 'Augnst,4, at elev'en, at the Griffin Inn, Ipswich. Attornies; Mr. E. Lowrance, Ipswich, or' Kr. Samuel Taylor John.'. street,.Bedford-row, London., • ',' • James Pitt, Swan-street, :Wineries, butcher, - June 30, at , tw.!.We; Jaly 4, at on and August 4.„ at ten; at Guildhall, Loadon. Attorney; Mr. E. A. Wilde, Warwick 7 squaret Newgitte.strert. ,James Fowler, Portsmouth, mere cant, - July 2, at -one, 4, -4 eleven, And August 4,-Pat one,-at the'Crown lan, despoil , • ''AttOrnies, Messrs. W. and J. Allen, Clifford's-inn, Londull , •or Mr. Winkworth, Portsmouth. • • Thomas. Holmes Warwick, grocer, July 1, 2,'.a.nd Au gus t 4' 'at eleven, at ;he Black Swan, 'Warwick. Attornies, Mr: John Sinart, Staple-inn, London,. Or Messrs. Tonle; ow' Ilerdon, War - Wick. Thomas Carter,, Charles-Street,. Northampton-s4nare, .dlesex„ .masher , inariuer,june i, July 4, and Att;u;t 4, t tat Guildhall,. London. Attorney, Mr..F. W. Carta , Lant-street, Southwark. George Haley, Plymouth Dock, Devonshire, china-mcv_liwit• June - 29, July 3, and August 4, at e.leve,n, at t, t: Nu, Fore-Street, Ply mouth-Dock. zOl - IViinborn, and . Coliett, Chancery-lane, lemdon, ,Peers, o r Mr. Bozon, Plymouth-Luck.. • 'Molnar; Pott, 'PalmyOat:, Warwickshire, Lin -keener, at five, 8, and AngtiSt 4, at eleven,..at the litch of Pr4:(:r, Wielinyr Bridge, Staffordshire. - Attarnies, Mc! - ,. ; ;T:;;- and Flicks, Baytietes 7 builthags, Ilulbora, or 1`.1.r. Nevill, Tannvorfa. Thomas Tron3, Bil: - ,ton, Staffordshire, woollen-tiroTer, B,•and Aii,gust at t - w,dve,-at the Swan Tavern, Buil-op:ter. Birninghwo. Attornies, Messrs.. his;- , in, Stevens, 111..ti,it. 4 1 and Pears - e, 'Old Jc7.7:7, - London, or Mr. NVltateley, mini ) lai)I. • RiCkards, formerly, of Newgate-street, warr hoGseruan, and l a t e o f Fetter-lane, tov,tun-ict:eper, June i t 2 ,:r July 7, and August 4, at t•ii; at Guildhall, ILoudon. tornev, Mr. Parton, WaN:look. • dohn Titomas, Bristolptailor, June 23, at twelve, July 7,, n August 4, at one, at the Greyhound Inn, BroadweP' Bristol: Attornies, Messrs. Wiliteornbe and King, jeant's-inn, fleet-street, Landon;or Mr J. H. Fraiilo l St. John-street, Bristol. [thvidends, &c. To-marrow.] South End, in Essex, and the neighbourhood for several miles round, were on Sunday mai-nil/4 visited by a very :severe storm o f th un d er .ito' lightning, accompanied by a shower of hail-stone s of uncommon size.' The thunder was trenico" dous, and the lightning extremely vivid and Be' were. It came on so suddenly, that several ladle' who were 4thing at the time, could not• ret.re:a t quick enough to - escape the " pelting of the pits' less storm.". The s pi re . o f R ay l e i g h Church Oh' struck by - the - electric fluid, and th e l ea d W it h which it was covered was stripped oft, and th e rafters were le't BIRTHS. On Wednesday last, at Hampstead-Hall, Staffordlhice, t" Lady of Wysley Birch, Esq. of a Son. On Thursday last, in - Red-lion-square, Mrs. Williams, 0f ,Son. On the 20th inst. at Clifton, the Lady of Lion - tenani-CoW Alorgan, Royal Glamorgan Militia, of a Danzirter, On Saturday last, -Mrs. Bramwell, of Lincoln's-inn-fieb ) of a Son. On Sunday last, the Lady o f Mr. Willi am S eymou r, of Stamford-Hill, of a Son. On the 21 s t inst.. at Hull, the Lady of Captain John ,• eholls - , of a Daughter. ' Yesterday moimitir,, at his house in Sloane-street, the L' 4l of Vincent - Stuckey, Esq: of a Daughter. , ' " • MARRIED. • On Monday last; at St. George's Church, Hanover-sqll r e Joshua S. S. Smith, F.,;(1. of Hampton Court, to Mrs. tletlivayte, of the saint! place. • --• 1 1 Yesterday, at . St. Mary-le-honne Church, Adolphw Dalrymple, .Esq. ,M.jor of the 19th Regiment of Light - 1 9( iy goons, eldest son of Sri Iftw.Dalrymple, to Anne, the ° • daughter of Sir. James Graham, 'Dart. The same day, 'at.lluritham; the Rev. Townshend Selo , ,j to Charlotte SOpiiia, eldest daughter of the Right Hon..l'' Right .Rev. Lord George Murray,. late Bishop of St. David • - DIED. ... On the lath inst. at Southaairion, Thomas Russell, E s t Captain in the ; East Essex.Militin, - pf.red.e i younest 5 0,3 , 0 r the late William Russell, Esq. of Barninghain:Hal, folk. ' t i j e On thelEth inst. of a consumption,' at Hampstead, 2ath year of tier age, Hem - letter,, the wife of Mr. W. A. Nctriman—ltreet, Ott Friday the 11,111 inst. at Lady Ahereromby's Richmond; in _the 9th ye:tr of his age, • Ralph Aberes ( '''„ Cameron, second son of Donald Cameror, of Lochiel,.E s 4,ier On Saturday last, in Mitldox , street, Hanorrr-smare, 3 ' . a long and painful iilll..!sS, Mrs. Stanley, sister of the Itec,lo J. Grrevilie, and of thle. Rev: Greville, Rector or ton, and of flonsell,:near Matlock - Bath, Derbyshire.- 03 • On Sunday afternoon, Mrs. Pallier, of Sloane-street, st advairced age. • • On Monday, suddenly, Samuel. Manesty, Esq. late RG 0:1 at Bussora, and Aml,assador to,the. Persian Court. KS YESTRDAY. , India Bonds, 3s. 9s. dis. ENChequer Bills, 3,4 d•P ~ r . .. 4 per Cent. 7.214 i , 3s. ss. 4s. dis. . , 3 per Cent. Red. 56U Ditto, 3y. per day, 3 3 . P', , 3 per Ceut. Con. shut Ontnium, '24 ; li pr. ,4 Bank L: Ann. - 15 1-13th 15 Cons—for Opening, 5 8 ` C " India F.toek, / —/ n 8 • HIGH WATER:VC LONDON BRIDGE TO-NIORJ: -- Morning, S 5 min, after 2. 1 Evening, 59 win. after_i