The Sun. — London, England, 1837-08-25 00:00:00

of its members support Ministers) and say this is England. There may be more sound political know ledge in England than in France ; but every English man may not be able to trace efrects to their causes so well as M. de Tocqueville has done in his profound work on the United States. So much for the absurd attempt to discover a reason for distinguishing between the Irish and. Btitish part of the representation. It brings into stronger belief the fact that Ministers have not only a majority quite sufficient to enable them to conduct the Government, but that they are supported by representatives returned by a vast majority of the thinking, the best ii!formed, and the most independent part of the people of England, of the people of Scot land, and of the people of Ireland. Under such circumstances we should think the Tory must have a wondrous aptitude for building castles in the air who entertains even the faintest hope of the return of his party to power. We do not mean to say Sir Hobert Peel is less willing to take office now than he was last Session, when he generously ad- restised himself ready for his old place ; but the readiness to accept cffice does not, as we have seen, imply the possession of the power to obtain it. Th e Thnes, however, tells the Tories not to despair, and it boldly grapples with the difficulty which it owns has been a stumbling-block to many of the party. The difficulty is thus stated by the Times, and it is put into the mouth of a Reformer : "If the Whig Ministry shall prove unable to conduct the Govern- inent by reason of possessing only a small majority, how can the Conservatives, who actually form a minority, expect to he more efficient than their rivals." Ay, how indeed ! " There are two facts connected with the new representatives nhich afford a strong presump tion that a Conservative administration will meet with their support." Anti what are these two facts ? " They are net, pledged to the contrary." But why should they leave a Reform for a Tory Government ? Not pledged not to run over to Sir Robert Peel is not exactly synonimous with a motive for running over to him. It used to be thought that rats instinctively s'..lek the Ministerial side of the House. Should the Par liament last its full time, the chances are that many who found their way into the House of Commons as Tories will become supporters of Ministers. The second fact of the Times proves, we think, satisfactorily that the Times can make nothing of the first. But we shall let the Times state its second fact in its own way. " Their minds are comparatively free from unfounded prejudices. When Lord Melbourne was abruptly dis missed by his late Majesty at Brighton, a suspicion was extensively entertained that the Court was treacherous to the cause of Reform, and that Sir Ro bert Peel's Ministry were to be the instruments for giving that treachery effect. But now the matter is wholly altered. The Whig gentry entertain no doubt whatever as to the soundness of Court politics at pre sent." Court politics being sound, why should Re form Members desert Ministers for the Tories ? They may not be pledged not to run over to Sir Robert Peel ; but does it follow that they will therefore sup port the first motion made by the Right Hon. Ba ronet to turn out Ministers ? The logic cf the Times is, that a pledge is the only security for a man's adhering to his opinions, and that the probabi lity is, if not pledged to them he will desert them. The Times here generalizes on its own case ; but because the Times is so ready to abandon prin ciples, and finds the task so easy, it is rash to con clude that this Jim Crow faculty is general. The contempt into which Sir James Graham has fallen, treated with contumely even by those for whose sakes he was anxious to degrade himself, affords a proof that the abandonment of principle and party is attended with hazard. Besides, the Times conveniently forgets that though it, perhaps inconsiderately, deserted the cause of the people, it did not desert them without a consideration. But the consideration for the sake of which the unpledged Reformers are to fly over to Sir Robert, merely to enable him to turn out Ministers, is not very distinctly shadowed forth. Master Barnar dine did not come up to be hanged, merely because he was invited to come up. Notwithstanding the two facts of the Times, we do not exactly see how Sir Robert Peel will be able to convert the Ministerial majority into a minority. We think we may safely conclude, then, that the Reformers will not avail them selves of their privilege of notbeing pledged to run over, on the first favourable opportunity, to Sir Robert Peel, and that the Right Hon. Baronet may wait a long time for office before he is elevated to it by the Reformers. Morning Chronicle. We were quite sure, that when the first pang of dis appointment was over—when all the elections were finished, and there was no possibility of getting any thing by any effusion, however copious, of abuse, or mystification, or fiction—the Whigs would have too much spirit to hang whimpering over the irretrievable past, and would manfully direct all their energies to the future. We will come better prepared, say they, to the next election ; we will put forth our resources then in earnest. The first of these resources is announced to be a more decided determination of Government patronage to Whig recipients. The conception is a noble one ; but has not the most been made of it already ? Is there anything which patronage could effect which p a t ronage h as not actua ll y effected? They do themselves injustice in allowing it to be imagined that there has been any lukewarmness or carelessness on their part in this particular. Their great merit, an ill-natured observer would say their only redeeming virtue, is the adhesiveness with which they cleave to their partisans. When of late years any Tory applicant addressed himself to Tory Minis ters upon the vacancy of an appointment, there was always some troublesome inquiry about the man's fitness for office, or about the practicability of reducing the pay. But 'Whig bowels yearn at once to a kinsman ; he gets the vacant office, if vacancy there be ; and, if there be no vacancy of any existing office, a new office is created to suit him. And this last ex pedient is excellent, not only for the private friend, but for the public service, be's.,ause the offices beii , more plastic than the candie.ates for them, it is a much neater operation to fit the suit to the man than the man to the suit. On, the whole, we think there is nothing fresh to be made by the Whigs in the field of patronage ; the crop is well harvested already. Near akin to the resource of patronage is another, which coarse peor::te call bribery. Of this no boast is made ; though - eve are bound to admit that we have heard of very poweiful effects produced by it in the masterly bands of the Whigs. With great delicacy and pro priety, they abstain from taking credit fur what tl: Av are likely to gain by their judicious and liberal, appli cation of this popular stimulant; hut we are not the less disposed to do them justice on thi k h ea d b„, u , e they refrain from vainglorious Taunting. With the same judicious reserve ',.ne 7 omit intimidation from the list of their we,-,,p(e„,: unlike the people at the Tower, who, in, exhibiting the armoury, never fail to show you, the thumb-screws. But the great items of all will be—Ballot, annual Par liaments, and an extension of the Suffrage—first, to houseliolflers in general, and after a little while to all ad'alts, with the exception, perhaps, of a few oh no:dous classes, unfit to be trusted with popular rights, :such as magistrates, clergymen, lawyers, landlords, leaseholders, yeomen, and possibly the freemen of towns. Should the constituencies once be purged of these corrupt interlopers, it might fairly be hoped that the B a ll ot an d the annual recurrence of the appeal to the soverei gn people would bring the whole affair to something as like perfection see in any human institution . as we can ever expect to of the What becomes, then, People's favourite and final measure —..the th Bill, ° the Wh o l e Bill , and nothinebutthe . Bill ? Fro that meas ure , t h e B a l lot, the abridgment of th e Par liamontary term, and the extension of the Suffrage were not only omitted, but purposely excluded. That Matters nothing, if they are now become necessary to the due representation of the people. Very true ; but the people, at least of Great Britain, have hinted by their recent votes, that they like representati on better without any of these devices. No such thing ; those voters are not " the people," and do not speak the people's ' mind. Indeed ! why how came you then to tell us, as the ground for supporting the Reform Bill, which invested them with the fran chise, that they were the classes, and absolutely the only classes, to whom the franchise ought properly to be trusted? Are they worthy or unworthy of the trust only as they select members to your mind ? Or was the great national compact of Parliamentary Re. form to lose its obligationas Boon as it ceased to sec-. e ►e turn of the disturbers ? We remember a half-wit- ted hid, a sort of rogue too in his weak r ay, who, in the days of our youth, used to gamb! , : with the village children for nuts, by tossing up tt bent farthing-, which he had hammered for- the purpose, and which he per suaded himself must bring him luck. When he wcti, he was strict in exacting payment, and btAIA - ed with all the composure of a prolessimal gamester; but if he lost two or three thmws, lie would begin to mutter and show his teeth, find fault with his own farthlbg, pro test there was something unfair in its `bias, and insist on being allowed a fresh ilance with a brass button which he had A knack of twirling. That varlet was the type of our present Liberals. The coin was struck after their own die: and, for the first chuck or two it came down as they cried it, " Tail." But now fol lows a reverse. " Heed" happens to come uppermost upon which they angrily refuse to abide by the event, and bluster for a new way of setting up the game, by a twirl of their B:rmingham button. —Times. A distinguished authority has observed that when the most solemn dictates have failed to make good counsel respected, a precept may be effectively conveyed in a parable or talc. Under sanction of this recom mendation, we would most earnestly direct the atten tion of the Tories to the fable of the " Three Warn ings." The supposed case of the old man who by one excuse and another twice escaped the grasp of that Prince of " Destructives," Death, and was on the third occasion remorselessly smitten by the avenger, is peculiarly applicable to the position of those who have twice evaded and repelled the claims of a people seeking rights as impossible to be per manently opposed as the mandates of the " fell tyrant ' himself. For two sessions of Parlia ment the claims of the British people have been ur gently enforced upon the attention of the Legislature. These claims have been put forward by inisters, sanctioned by the Sovereign, supported by the almost unanimous voice of the people, and contumeliously rejected by a corrupt and decrepid faction. To the result of the third "call " is the attention of the whole empire now directed with an all-absorbing interest ; and, like the old man in the fable, the Tories, by a number of plausible devices, endeavour to flatter themselves into a belief that they shall again be able to put off the day of retribution. But the fiat is gone forth. In the last two Sessions of Parliament the demands of Reform were spurned by the Tories with the most marked expression of abhorrence. In the Commons attempts were made to give this igno minious treatment the semblance of a justification, but in the Lords the sovereign will of hereditary law givers was esteemed in itself an irrefutable reason against the concession of those rights which the people so justly claim from their oppressors. Twice has this outrage against the national feeling been perpetrated— twice have the respect for existing institutions and the hope of gradual concessions induced the people to re main tranquil under their aggravated wrongs, and now, for the third time, they are preparing to knock for ad mission to the temple of the Constitution. They make no claims which are not strictly consonant with the spirit of our so much lauded Constitution— they seek only to embody in practice that which hitherto has existed only in name—they seek to con solidate the Union with Ireland on its only tenable basis—the equalization of rights and reciproca tion of interests, and to wrest from monopolists of every denomination those spoils which have been plundered from the people. These are the pur poses for which the people are a third time preparing to besiege the doors of Parliament ; and, without meaning to imply any threat, we would calmly ask the Tories if they consider it probable that the nation will again quietly submit to see the legitimate expression of its will quashed by the tyranny of a faction ? After all the election villanies of the Tories, the people still have a majority in the House of their Representatives. To this majority an objection is attempted to he taken on account of its being " exclusively Irish." One Morning Contemporary involves itself in the most elaborate absurdities, endeavouring to demonstrate that Irish Members should not have the same influence in the House of Commons as English Members. An other worthy Tery journalist swears to make it " re sound through the political world that the majority is exclusively Irish." An " exclusively Irish majority" seems something not to be tolerated amongst civilized Legislators—it seems a thing not to be endured that these " alien" Irish should become " exclusives," and cut all Tory associations. The title is, however, an appropriate one, and in future when we may find it necessary to expose the " inevitability of a Conserva tive Government," we shall refer to the majority of " Irish exclusives."—Morning Advertiser. The investigations which the new Parliament will be required to pursue, as the first of its duties after it is called together, into the manner in which several of its Members have been elected, or at least returned, will, if we are rightly informed, lead to many instruc tive disclosures. They will, or we are much deceived, completely open the eyes of the people at large to the hollow insincerity of the pretension which the Whig- Radicals so constantly and ostentatiously put forth to a peculiar, if not exclusive, reverence for the freedom and purity of election. It would be impossible for us to mention a twentieth part of the instances which have been supplied to us from what we cannot but be lieve authentic and faithful sources of information, of coercive tyranny exercised by the partisans of the Administration—of tricks and inameuvres of the most disgraceful character, practised by zealous and important Members of the Ministerial faction—of bribery, unstinted and un di sgu i se d —of frauds pal pably illegal, as well as desperately wicked, which they have not scrupled to commit in order to obtain the fallaciou s appearance of a majority at the first meeting of the House of Commons. We do not stop now to remark on the kind of majority which they have been abl e to o b ta i n, even with all the aid they could derive from the most unsparing and unscrupulous employment of the means we have inadequately de scribed. Our purpose is to present one or two in stances out of the countless multitude which have been brought to our knowledge of fraudulent impositions upon returning officers, of such a nature as must ren der any election at which they were practised with success a mere nullity. The first example we shall select of the election management by which the Mi nisterial patty have acquired the mi g hty ma j or ity o f which, they boast is an Irish case. Having said this, 7,e need scarcely add that it is a case in which the management was successful to the extent of ohtaining the contested seat, and adding one to that effi cient Mini s t er i a l ma j or i ty which the organs of the Government on the other side of St. George's Channel prof ess t o thi n k so muc h t h e more va luable that "it is exclusively Irish." We are credibly informed, and have no doubt of the per fect accuracy of the statement, that the return of Mr. Mahoney and the temporary rejection of Col. Thomas at Kinsale were produced by the introduction of fraudulent and fictitious voters. The Conservative voters of that borough know that they have won the election, although, in consequence of the admission of fictitious voters to the poll, the O'Connell candidate, Mr. Mahoney, has been returned. The legitimate constituency are, indeed, so entirely convinced that on the removal of the names of the fictitious vote's whom the Roman Catholic priests sent to the poll, the seat will be adjudged to their candidate, Colonel Thomas ; that, although by no means a wealthy body, they have subscribed among themselves a considerable sum to wards defraying the expense of a petition ; and have earnestly appealed to all the friends of honest and genuine election, to the enemies of perjury and fraud, in the three kingdoms, to make up the necessary amount. No doubt is entertained or pretended by a single individual of any party at Kinsale as to the means by which the return of Mr. Mahoney was secured. The only hope upon which the O'Con nell party rely is, that money will not be found to defray the cost of the investigation necessary to unseat their Memb er . That thishope will fail them „there can be no doubt, since it involves the supposition that the Conservatives of the United Kingdoms are deficient in the energy and zeal with which a cause like theirs ought to be supported, The second example of dis graceful fraud which we shall take from the long file before us occuried, we lament in that part of it w h ere the electionslosay, a be not altogether ind e p en d ent of the in influence England, wed and to hi i c h the Earl of Durham_ derives from hi s large. and valu- THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, AUGUST 25, 1837 able possessions. The object here was not to gain a seat : for, v:ith all the artifices, lawful or unlawful, to v,..hich the Durham party (Amid resort, this was seen at an earl . , period of the electiAl to be utterly hope less. The linvardoejs it,ititity we are about to record is withntit Even the bad apology of a great temp tation. The danger and the, trirrikt tt•tre braved, ror the sake of the ttiA:e childish triumph of placing the candidate Who enjoyed the support of the Earl of burham at the head of the poll, instead of Mr. Liddell, who, but for the vile and base e xpedients to which the Whig-Radical party had recourse, would un doubtedly have occupied that position. At Sunder land upwards of 40 had votes were polled in favour of the Durham candidate, many of which, we are as sured, were those of persons hired for the occasion to personate absent voters. One case of a peculiarly re volting character has been detailed to us, with full particulars of the names, residences, and occupa tions of the voter, at that moment in London, and of the wretched hireling, the instrument and victim of men by many degrees more wicked than him self, who borrowed for the day the name of the absent elector, and made oath that it was his o an. The party must have lost all sense of shame, as well as all regard to morality and religion, before it could have set up as it did, in the face of two or three hundred persons fully cognizant of the fact, a profligate and reckless dependent to swear to a manifest and no torious falsehood ; and this for no higher purpose than to gratify the vanity of the Earl of Durham. When the bribery oath was put to this sham voter he hesitated for a considerable time, but at length took it. The hesitation of course could only have arisen from the civeumstance that the voter, having only been paid for one false oath, did not at first quite like to take another gratuitously. Is it, we ask, by means of such transactions as these that the local influence of a Li beral Nobleman, or the political power of a Liberal party, either can or ought to be sustained ?—Morn b'n a Post. THE NEW PARLIAMENT. Those ►*narked thus are New Members. ENGLAND AND WALES. Liberals, Conservatives. Etwgll, R. _S•antcy, W. Lushingtoti, C. C. Rickford, W. Praed, W. M. Tonere.% H. W. Citieliester, J. P. B. Paget, F. Rtmell, Lord C. J. F. Pusey, Philip -Winnington, T. Attwotict. T. Scholetield, J. Turner, W. Vivian, C. C. A insworth, Peter —Duke, Sir James Lister, E C. —Eustlekt, W. intfiel.l, T. n Pollen, Sir J. W. .Hodgson. F. .towerpcourt, Lord Bruges, Alford, Viscount Polhill, F. -Steuart, R. Palmer, R. -Rat ingtati, Viscount -Holmes, W. -Hodgson, It, Hogg, .1. W. -Fox, G. Lane —Feilolen. W. Spry, Sir S. T. -Bo ling, Brnwnrigg, J. C. Wonfl, Colonel T. Morgan, C. M. R. Whitmore, T. C. Broadwond, H. THE BRIDE'S OUTFIT. A young girl of about twenty appeared last week upon the criminal bench of the Court of Assizes at Versailles. She was weeping bitterly, while those around her were endeavouring to console her. The following is the simple narrative of the poor girl's offence, as related by her advo cate :—Marie Montel, a sempstress, inhabited the com mune of Sevres. She is the eldest of five sisters, and for eight years her industry has been the main support of her family. It may easily be supposed that her savings had not been considerable ; nevertheleis, she had won the heart of a young man at Paris, of the name of Marcel, and the 15th of May last was to have been, as people are wont to say before marriage, the happiest day of their lives. The perfidious spirit of coquetry, unfortunately, took possession of the poor girl, and persuaded her that a muslin gown embroidered with pink flowers, a silk scarf edged with a little lace, and a smart cap with a wreath of anzez would harmonise admirably with the maiden garland that was growing for her in the parterre of St. Cloud. Her heart also told her that the muslin cravat, tied on the wed ding day, by her own fair hands, would be for her dear Marcel a token of fidelity. To obtain these braveries 40 francs in ready money were wanted, and how were they to be raised ? She had still fifteen working days before her, but her mother was to have one half of her earnings, and the other half would never amount to the required sum. Poor Marie thought when once she became Madame Mar cel she would soon be able to save the 40 francs out of her housekeeping, but she felt that it would be impossible for her to obtain credit for the longed-for finery ; and under these circumstances, after having for some time hesitated, she at length re4olved upon the commission of a crime. She went to a mercer's elop in Boulogne, where she handed in a letter, purporting to be written by a Madame Langlois, re questing that the articles therein specified might be en trusted to the bearer, her servant. The mercer himself was absent, but his wife would readily have delivered the goods if the embarrassed manner of Marie had not awakened her suspicion, and she accordingly said that sbe would send the articles ordered by one of her own people. All the fond illusions of the poor bride were at once dissipated. Her arrest followed, and already by an imprisonment of three months, while awaiting her trial, she had bitterly expiated her error. The advocate concluded by demanding an ac quittal, on the ground that Marie Montel had already been sufficiently punished. After an hour's deliberation the jury returned a verdict of guilty, by the simple majority of 7 against 5. The Court inflicted the minimum of punishment —one year's imprisonment. Every one was surprised at the apparent insensibility of the poor girl on hearing her sentence ; but the fact was that the technical jargon of the law had been unintelligible to her. When apprised of her fate by one of the gens d'armes near her, she screamed and fainted in the arms of her afflicted mother. Her cries and sobs were heard for some time after she had been removed from thebench of the accused. NEWSPAPER COVERS.—It cannot be too strongly impressed on the minds of parties wishing to send news papers abroad, that the directions must always be written, without any printing whatever. We have now several covers before us which have been sent to France, and merely because " The Leeds Mercury," and " Mr." was printed thereon, they have been returned, having written on " printing on cover." This Post Office law applies, we believe, to all parts of the Continent.—Leeds Ilfercury. [And it is in our opinion a very absurd one.—Ed. Sun.] Last evening, about seven o'clock, the City Arms public-house, at present unoccupied, in East Harding-street, Gough-square, Fleet-street, fell down with a tremendous crash. From the opposite windows several bricks were seen falling from various parts of the building, then the shutters of the apartment usually occupied as the bar gave way and fell into the street, but ere a few persons could be collected to render assistance, the whole front of the house fell into East Harding-street, and the rear into Featherbed-lane. Happily no person was passing at the time ; but although considerable danger existed of the old buildings adjoining sharing the same fate, a crowd assembled, and remained in front of them till Mr. Savage (Common Councilman of the Ward) prudently sent to the Giltspur-street Compter for the assistance of the City police, who were promptly in at tendance, and, without doubt, prevented loss of life, for the crowds were no sooner removed than a brick wall fell down into the street, on the very ground they had occupied. The house opposite, in the occupation of Mr. Lewis, a milkman, and also a chandler's shop adjoining, have sustained consi derable damage. A report was spread that a man was buried under the ruins, but - up to eleven o'clock last night, the truth of the statement could not be ascertained, although it is feared that the report has a somewhat likely foundation, and persons are employed digging in the ruins to clear up all doubts on the subject. SUDDEN DEATH.—On Sunday evening, Mr. William Taylor, of Rochdale, clerk to the magistrates, having been walking out with his children, was returning home through Balie-street, when he was seized with a fit of apoplexy, near the Association Chapel, and expired in a few minutes. He was also Clerk to the Commissioners of the Police, as well as to the Halifax road. Several can didates are already in the field, for the respective situations which have become vacant by his death. A GOOD EXAMPLE.—The excitement of the elec tion is over in Bradford ; and if any bad feeling had existed during the contest, we are glad to find that it has died away. The town has assumed its usual quietness, and the tradesmen arc engaged in the important concerns of buying and selling without reference to party distinction. We believe that less petty animosity was exhibited during the late election, than was shown in any of the preceding elec tions since Bradford became a borough.—Leeds Mercury. TATIIANI V. WRIGHT.—The referee in this case, it is said, is Mr. Robertson, Barrister-at-law, who will hold his Court in Lancaster and Hornby in a few days, for the purpose of examining witnesses and documents relative to the amount of rents, &c., for the last six years, with sum mary power to compel witnesses to give evidence, on pain of imprisonment. He will be accompanied by Mr. Peel, junior Council for Admiral Tatham, and by Mr. Martin, junior Council for the defendant, Mr. Wright.—Lancaster Guardian. PRESTON.—We are unfeignedly glad to be able to follow up our report of last week, by a still more favour able account of the trade of this town. There are at pre sent very few•hand-loom weavers unemployed, and there is a steady demand for goods at improved prices. A consi derable stroke of business was don• at Manchester on Tuesday last, and our manufacturers and• spinners appear to have gathered fresh hopes and buoyancy from the •pro mising state of that market. The factories are running full time ; and on th, whole there is reason to expect, that we shall speedily return to the wonted prosperity and ac tivity which for some years past, allowing for intervals of gloom, the cotton trade has enjoyed.—Preston Chronicle. Yesterday evening, between five and six o'clock, a shocking accident occurred in Regent-street to Miss Som merville, a young lady, 17 years of age, who was knocked down by a cab, and the wheel passed over her arm, which was frightfully fractured. It appears that the cab-driver, who was a mere lad, was driving at a frightful and furious rate, being much intoxicated. On his discoverin g what mischief he had occasioned, he galloped off into Oxford street, and effected his escape from his pursuers. The un fortunate lady was carried to a surgeon's, who reduced the fracture, and she was afterwards conveyed in a coach tq her residence, in Sussex-street, Bedford-square. —Tracy, __ Warburton, 11. I_Jervis, Swyn ten Pechell, Captain I Berkeley, F. IL Verney, Sir H. Walker, R. Fitzroy, Lord C. Shelburn, Lord Townley, R. G. Rice, T. S. Prprie, 0. Conyagleam, Lord A Pryse, P. Howari, P. H. Marshall, W. -3 , lorriii, David .Eyng, Berkeley, C. Stanley, E. J. Wilbraham, G. Grosvenor. Lerd R. Jervis, J. Lennox, Lord A. smith, J. A. Fort, Jihn Aglionliy, H. A. Ilersraan, Biwaid Vivian, Sir A. Lenula, Sir C. Penslarves, E. W. Ellice, Rt. Hon. B. Williams, W. —Agliouby, Major Jamas, W. Seale, Colonel Cavendish, G. I. —Evans, W. E. Strutt, Edward Ponsonby, Hon. T. Dundas, J. D. Csdrington, Sir B. Grey Sir G. Ebringtos, Viscount Strangways, J.S. —Nice, Edward Lanabton, M. Peace, Joseph lowan, J. Harland, W. C. Dirett, B. Dunconalle, T. S. Wakley, Thomas —Dundas, W. D. Ripper., C. Talbot, C. B. Moreton, Hos. A. H Berkeley, Hon. Q. —Pailpotta, J. Heaeage, E. Clayton, Sir W. Barnard, E. B. Wood, C. —Protheree, B. Leferre, C. 8. —Mice, Captain Robert - Sir E. P. B. Honkies, K. Price, Sir E. Clive, E. B. Alstee, newlaid Cowper, W. F. —Stewart, Hurst, R. H. —Stausfield, W. R. C. _ . ?if u el ft g h u e wl, Lord , - -Wood, IL W. Hedges, T. L —Rich, - -Langdale, Hon C. D'Eyncourt, C. T. Hawes, B. Baines, E. —Molesn'ortis, Sir W. —F,a4tliope, Job* —Duckworth, S. —Greenaway, Chula. Blunt, Sir C. Anson, Sir aleerge —Paget, Laird A. Woraley, Lori Handley, H. Bulwer, E. L. Buller, C. Wood, Alderman Pattison, J. Grote, G. Crawford, W. —tialwey, Colonel Pinney, W. Brocklebnrst„T. Andover, Viscount Childers, J. W. Milton, Lori Thomson, C. P. Philips, M. Hall, B. Whalley, Sir L Guest, J. J. Byng, George Poyntz, W. S. Williams, W. A. •Blewitt, Reginald Edwards, J. Leveson, Lord Wilde, 'T. ()nil, W. tlawkiw, J. If. —Blake. R. —Wrightson, W. B. Smith, Vernon Currie, Makes Howwit. Lord —Blackett, C.: Ferguson, Sir Ronald Hobhouse, Sir J. C. Fieldea, J. —Johnson, General —Earle, Rolfe, Sir R. M. Heron, Sir 11. Fazakerley, J. N. J. Bewes, T. —Stanley, Massey •Courtenay, .Dalryreple Sir A. J Miles, P. J. Chatidos, Marquis of Young, Sir W. L. Harcourt, G. V. Fremantle, Sir T. Jermyn, Lerd Yorke, E T. Eaton, Richard J. Geulburn, H Law, Hon. W. E. Mradshaw, James Nichol!, J. Powell; Colezet Trevor, Mtn. G. I. —Jones, John .Gore, J. N. a •Hughes, Egerton, W.T. Ere. ton, Sir P. O. Neeld, Joseph 'Solders,. H. G. .Hose, Sir George Cripps, J. -Master, Colonel Saidorsoo, li. Smyth, Sir H. .Elliot, Lord Neeld, John •Geddard, Ambrose Stanley, IL Irton, S. Wynn, Sir W. W. fagot, Hon. W. Jonos, Wilson Crewe, Sir O. .Hurt, Francis Eateetut, T. S. D. -Arland, Sir Thomas Parker, M. E. N. Buller, Sir J. B. Y. Cooper, Hon. H. A. Williams, Robert Ashley, Lord Bruit, H. C. Reid, Sir John Rae •Packington, HAwk es, T, -Liddell, Trevor, Hon. A. Vernon, Granville Duncorobe, A. -Round, Tyrrell, Sir J. Brewton, T. W. Palmer, George Bowles, G. R. Borthwick, P. Follett, Sir W. W. Kerrison, Sir E. .11Flynne, Sir S. R. Shoppard, T. •Adare. Lord Coirington, C. W. Hale, E. Slagdos Hope, H. T. Welby, G. Earle T.llentache, A. 0, Williams, T. P. -Attwood, Wolverly Wall, C. B. .Scarlett, Major J. Y. aleathcote, Sir W. Fleming, Admiral Compton, H. C. Herriee, J. C. -Planta, J. -Cantalupe, Loa Foley, E. T. -Eirr, Higford Griroston, Viscous' Smith, Abel Mahon, Lori EAillie, Colonel H. —James, Sir Walter —Wilberforce, W. —Felloweo, Edward —Thornhill, George Peel, Colonel J. Pollock, Sir F. —Gibson, —Holmes, Knatchbull, Sir E. plumptrr, J. P. Geary. Sir W. -Godson, It. ➢entinck, Lord O. Causing, Sir S. Stanley, Lard Patten, Wilson Egerton, Lord F. Wilbraham, Hon. B. Greene, T. —Marlin, G. R. Hardline, Sir N. Somerset, Lord C, —Farnham, ILdford, Packe, C. W. Hatboro, Lord Fitzroy, Lord H. —Christopher, Ileathrete, G. J. Sththorp, Colonel Sandon, Lord —Cromwell, C. Clive. Viscount Stewart, J. Mackinnon, W. A. —Grimeditch, W. . - Lewis, W. Benjamin Dick. Quinteu —Round, J. Brun:, Lord E. Bat ing, H. B. Ricbards, Richard I—Woad, Captain Somerset. Lord •. Wynn, C. W. Gladstone, W. E. Miller, W. H. —De Honey. Hulde, J. U. Wodelsouse, —Burroughes, —Bagge. - -Chute, .Maidstone, Lord Maun9ell, T. P. Cartwright, W. L Knightley, 'Sir C. Ossuliton, Lora Bell, M. Scarlett, R. C. •Douro, 'Marquis of Houldsworth, T. Knight, K. Lincoln, Earl of a°Union, Colonel Harcourt, Norreye, Lord .Parker, Maclean, D Inhe, Sir R. H. Eetc•urt, T. O. B. Owen, Sir J. Owen, H. O. Freshgeld, J. W. foliffe, Sir N. Manes, 11.?q4iTd Places. Portsmouth Preston Ft.lnor,hire Radnor Reading tte , .gate ItiChinor.4 .".. Ripon Rochdale Rochester llutlandAire... ..... .. Rye St. Alban's St. he's Salford Sal kibury SMichvich Scarborovigh shAllosbury 51Ptiticid Shoreha - n Shrewsbury Shropshire., North , Saropshire, South Somerset, rest Somerset, West South Shielis . Southampton Southwark Staffordshire, N •rth. Staffordshire, Soutis , Stafford Stamford Stockport Stoke-on-Trent Stroud Sudbury Suffolk, last Suffolk, West Sunderlan& Surrey, East Surrey, West Sussex, East Sussex, West Swansea Tamwoith Ti. v ist sek Taunton Tewkesbury Thetford 7hirsk Tiverton Totnes Tower Hamlets Truro Tvnemouth Sirakofielst Wallingforsi Walsall Wareham Warrington Warwickshire, North., Warwiekshire, South. Warwick Wells Wenlock Westbury Westminster Woetai•rela*d Weymouth Whitby Whitehave■ Wigan.. Wil'on Wiltshire, North Wiltshire, South Winchester Windsor Wolverhamptos . Woodstock Worcesterslaire, East Woreesterskire, West, \Vorcester Wycombe Yarmouth Yorkshire, Nut Aiding' Torksh ire,North Riding Yorkshire, West Riding York Libcrals, . —Pousonby, C. ,—Phillips, G. . 1 Carter, J. B. Baring. F 'l'. Fleetwood, H. ..: \Adkins, W. 'Falco:in?, T. N .-I*.ilmer, C. F. Ditncir:s, J. C. Alexander Fenton, John Bernal, it. '—tiobhouse, W. H. Ileatheote, Sir G. ?laves. AblUiddn • Andover Angesea Arundel Ashburton Ashton-under-Lyne Aylesbury Banbury Barnstaple Bath Beauraaris Bedfordxhire Bedford Berkshire Bernick-upou-Tweed. , Beverley Bevrdley Birmingham Blackburn Rodmin Bolton Roston Br, dford Ereconshire Brcco• Bridgenerth Bridgewater Bridprt Brighton Bristol Buckinghamshire Bueki•igharx Bury Bury St. Edmuusts Caine Cambridgeshire. Cambridge Calabriize University.. Canterbury Cardiff Cardiganshire . Cardigan Carlisle. Cinnartkenshire , Csrmarthos Carnarvonshire C.rnarvon Chatlt m Cheltenham Cheshire, North Cheshire, South Chester Chiehostor Chippeahan Christehareis CiresseEter Clititeree Coskarinentl Colchester Cornwall, in Cornwall, Woot Coviettry Criticlade Cumberlani, Zust Car►heriari. wat Dartmouth Denbighshire Denbigh Derbyshire, Nertls Derbyshire, South , Derby Devim Devonpert Devonshire, North Devonshire, South Derehester Dorset hire Dover Droittvich Dudley Durham. North Durham, South Durham' bast Retford Essex, North lbsex, esuth Evashars itt eter Eye Finsbury Nlintshire Flint Burghs Frame Gateshead Glamorganahire Gloucestershire, Gloucestershire, West, Gloucester Grantham Groat Grimsby Grant Marlow Greenwich Guildford Halifax Hampshire, liortk Hampshire, Souris Harwish Hastings HaTerfordwest Heisten Herefordshire Hereford Hertfordshire Piertford Honitoa Horsham Huddersfield Hull Huatingionshlre I untingclea Hytlie Ipswich Isle of NVight Kendal Keit, Dust Kent, West Kidderminster King's Lyn' Kraresborougi I araboth Laaooshire, North I Lancashire, Santis Lanearster Liuncegten Leeds Leiscstenhire, Nortb...l Leicestershire, Sentis...l Leicester Leominster Lewes Lichfield Liooolnshire. North Lincolnshire, South Lino.ln Liskcard Liverpool London Ludlow Lyre Regia Lyneington IWacclesBeli Maidstone Ma'don Malrnesbury Malton Manchester Marlborengli Alarylebeno Merionethshire Merthyr 'rydvil Middlesex Midhurst Monmouthshire i i Monmouth Montgomeryshire Montgomery Morpeth Newark Newonstle.unner-Lyne Neweastle-on-Tyue Newport NorfoUc, na.... ....... ... Norfolk, West NortitaHerten 1 Northampton. North Northampton, South Northampt•ii Nortikumborland, North Northumberland, South Norwich IsTottinghamehire, Nottk Nottinghamshire. South Nottingham.. Oldham Oxfordshire Oxford ..... Oxford Ur ',may Pesobrekeahire Pembroke Penryn and Falmouth Peterborough Petersfield Plymouth Pontefract ........ ",",”.. Places. Aberdeenshire Aberdeen .... Argyishire Ayrshire Ayr District Banff:hire Berwickshire Buteshire Caithness-shire Clackniannenshire Dumbartonshire Dumfriesshire Dumfries District Dundee Edinburghehire Edinburgh Elgin District Elgin and Nairn Falkirk District Fifeshire F.rfarshire Glasgow Greenock fladdingtensiure Haddington Inverness-shire Inverness District.... Kilmarnock District Kincardineshire Kirk Ody District Kirkcudbrightshire Lanarkshire Leith District Linlithgowshi re M on trose District Orkney and Shetland Paisley Peebles-shire Perthshire Perth Renfrewshire Ross Roxbarghshire St. Andrew's District Selkirkshire Stirlingshire Stirling District Sutherlandshire Wick District Wigtowhire Wigton District Places. Antrim, Cc Armagh, Co Armagh Athlone Bandon Belfast Carlmv, Co ................. . Carlow ........................ Carrickfergus ..........••• •• Cashel ........ . ............... Cavan, Cs. .................. Clare, Co. . Cloimel .. Coleraiue .......... .. ... ark, Cc ................ . Cork Donegal, Co Downshire ...... ...... I Downpatrick Drogheda Dublin, Co. Dublin, City Dublin University Dundilk Dungannon Dungarvon Ennis Enniskillen Fermanagh, Co. Galway, Co 1 Galway I I Kerry. Co. Kild4re, Co. Kilkenny, Co 1 Kilkenny ... King's County 1 Kinsale Leitrim, Co. Limerick, Ce. Linierizk t Lisburn Londonderry Londonderry, Co. Lonterd, Cc Louth, Co Mallow Mayo, Co. Moatla, Co Monaghan, C• Newry New Hoes Portarlingto■ Queen's aunty 'Wm-amen, Co Sligo, Co Sligo Tipperary, Co. Tralee Tyrone, Co. Waterford, Co Waterford Westmeath, Co Wexford, Co Wexford Wicklow Youghall. 0.4•41 I ,—Maskett, Brotherton, J. Brodie, W. B. Troubridge, Sir T. —Carnac, Sir J. 11. —Style, J. Poultur, J. S. Parker, J. } —Ward, 0. H. Goring, IL 1). .!—Slaney, J. Langton, Col. G . Sanford, E. A. i—Duncan, Lord I Humphery, .1. Harvey, D. W. nutter, E. Anson, Hon. Colonel Chetwynd, W. Marsland, H. Russell, Lord John &rope, O. P. .White, Andrew Donlan, W. J. Cavendish, Hon. C. Lennox, Lord G. Surrey, Earl of Vivian, J. H, Russell, Lord W. Rundle, J. Bainbridge, E. T. Laboudiere, H. —Martin, J. Euston, Earl of Compton, C. Heatheoat, J. Palmerston, ViBCOLII3 Seymow - , Lord Parrott, J. Clay, W. Lushington, Dr. —Turner, E. Young, G. F. —Finch, Francis Collins, W. —Hayter, 6. W. —Briscoe, J. Evans, Colonel —Leader, J. T. Potter, R. —Standish. Charles Long, W. Renett, John I—Mildrnay, P. St. J. Ramsbottsm, J. —Gordon Thorneley, Thomas Villiers, Charles I'. Winnintou, H. —Davies, Colonel Smith, Hon. R. J. - Dashw•od, G. H. ___l , umbold, C. E. —Willshere, W. Cayley, Morpeth, Viscoun t (e St r ickland, Sir . Dun(las, J. C. SCOTLAND. Liberal➢. Bannerman, A. Campbell •f Islay Dunlop, J. Stuart, Lord James —Duff, James Adam. Admiral —Colguhatm. Sir J. Sharpe, General Parnell, Sir H. —Craig, Gibson, Sir J. Abercromby, J. Campbell, Sir John Hay, Sir A. L Gillen, W. D. Wernyss t Captain Hallybulton, IA D. G, Beatinck, Lord W. Dennistoun, J. 'Wallace, X Steuart, R. 11.Lecil, IL —Ferguson, Robert Fergusson, R. C. Murray, J. A. ChalinerE, P. —Dundas, F. Hastiw, .A. I--Kinnaird, —Elliott, Captain —Ellice, Dalmeny, Lord —Howard, E.G. CI. Loch, James M'Taggart, J, 'arkcr, R. T. Price, Richard Eastnor, Viscount Pemberton,Thomtte —Supicii, Sir Edward Nod, Sir Gerard .Moneypettny, Capt. Grrimstone, E. H. liaise, James Wyndham, W. H. Trench, Sir F. Burrell, Str C. M. Jenkins, Hi:l, Sir Rowland Gore, W. O. Darlington, Earl of Clive, 11. H. Miles, W. -Acland, 'l'. D. Ingham, Robert Dottin, A. ft. •Baring, •Ingestrie, Lord Farrand, Robert Ch 131 in, T. -Granby, Marquis Marsland. T. Davenport, J. -Copeland, W. •Barnes, Sir E. .Hamilton, Sir J. Vere, Sir C. B. Henr.iker, Lord Rush Smoke, Colone .Logan, Thompson, W. Meager, Richard -Kensble, Henry -Perceval, Captain -Darby, George Peel, Slr it, -A'Court, Capt. E Dawdeswell, W. Baring, Hon. F. Vivian, J. E. —Lasceles, W. S. Blackctonc, W. S. Calentil, J. H. Slaokburne, J. I. Wilmot, Sir E. Dugdale, W. b. 1117.rdaunt, Sir J. —Shirley. E. J. —Douglase, Sir C. —lilakernore, Foreiter, Hon. G. Ga%kell, J. M. Lowther, Viteettat Lowth r, Colonel —VilHem Lord —Hope, G. W. Chapman, A. Attwomi, M. —Baker, B. —Burdett, Slr F. Heckert, Sidney Bast, J. Buller —Peyton, Hairy —St. Pa.4l, Horace —Barneby, John Lygon, Hon. Gen, Bailey, Joseph lethell, R. —ireadley, Duncombe, W. Lowther, J. N. Conservatives. Gordon, Hon. W. Campbell, Sir H. P. Rae, z,ir William Sinclair, Sir G. Joinistone. /lope Grant, Colonel F. IV —Ramsay, Lord Chlabobn, A. W —Colquiuntn, Arbuthnot, Hu. H. I—Lockhart, N. M. Flops, MIL J. _Mackenzie, - -Stormont, Lord Houstous, G. Mackenzie, Thomas Pringle, A. Forbes, W. —Blair, C. IRELAND, Liberals. C A u c r h r os y7 it, v. Viscintu t O'Ceitnell, J. —Gibson, lieblast, Lord Visors, N. Yates, J. A. I—Maule, W. H. \\foul* ficigeant Macnamara, W. O'Brien, Cornelius Ball, N. Barry, G. S. —Roche, G. B. —Beamish, _ p'Calla g liain, D. —Scrnettiite, Sir W. Evans, 0. Brabnzon, Lord cyconi,;!ii D -Hutton, .Reddington, •Northland, Viscount •O'Callaghan Hon. C. Bridgman,Dewitt Martin, Thomas Bodkin, John Jailed Lynch, A. H. Blake, M. J. O'Connell, M. J. O'Ferrall, More •Archbold, Butier, Hon. P. •Bryan, George Hume, Joseph Fitzsimon, N. Westenra, J. C. •Mahony, Clements, Lord White, Samuel Fitzgibbon, Hon. R. O'Brien, W. S. Roche, W. Roche, D. Ferguson, Sir it. A White, Luke .White, Colonel IL Chester, H. Bellew, IL U. Jephson. C. D. 0. Bralrazon, Sir W. J. Browne, R. D. O'Connell. Morgan Grattan, Hoary Weetenra, H. IL Talbot, J. A. Coote, Sir C. —Fitzpatrick, John O'Connor Don French, F. —Somers. .1. R Shell, R. L. Cave, Otway Power, James Stuart, W. Vi Hors Wyse, Thomas Barron, W. H. Chapman, M. L Nagle, Sir it. P. , wer, James Maher, John Walker, C. A. Howard, R. Grattan, J. .Howard, VV.; Conservatives. O'Neil, J. —lrvine, John Veruer, W. Jackson, J. D. Kirk, r Young, John Maxwell, H. Litton, Edward MEMBERS Finch, George Finn, W. F. Fi;zsimon, C. Folkes, Sir W. Forster, C. (Laken, O. Gistpttrz, 'l'. Ghlstone, T. Goodrieke, Sir F. Guulburn, Serjeant Graham, Sir J. Greisley, Sir u. Gully, John Hamilton, Lord C Hamilton, G. A. Haunter, H. Hanmer, Sir J. Hardy, J. Flay, Sir John Hector, C. J. Hodges, T. T. Holland, Edward Hoy, J, B. Hughes, H. Hutt, William Johnston, A. Johnstone, Sir John King, E. B. Knox, Hon. J. Lawson, A. Lee, J. Lee Lees, J. F. Letloy, A. Lennaid, 'l'. B. Lewis, D. Lopez. Sir R. L ngtield, R. Lushington, S. R Mandeville, Vise. Mangles, J. Martin, J. Mathew, Capt. Mimic, lion. Fox Maxwell, J. Alethuen, P. Morrison; J. Mi.:tyn, E. Mullins W. F. North, F. O'Connell, :Maurice Oliphant, L. Ord, \V. H.- Palmer, General Parry, J. I . P. Conolly, Colonel Hayes, Sir E. S. Castlereagh, Viscount Hillsborough, Etrl of Kerr, D. Shaw, F. Lefroy, Dr. T. EJECTED or /grow, Sir Andrew Angels, tit), John Astley, Sit Joeo Ila7,stlaw, John Baltitrai, Dr. Thuinas Barclay, David Barham, J. Beauclet k, tjor Beaumont, T. oi Bellew, Sir Ilercsi,rd, Sir ohn Berkeley, F. B. Blab, Thomas Bonham, F. Bowring, Dr. Bradshaw, J. Brady, I). C. Bruce, C. L. C. Brudenell, Lord Bruen, I' Bruce, Colonel Buckingham, J. S. Bulwer, t. L. Bunton, W. W. Burton, H. Buxton, 'l'. F. Charlton, Chichester, Arthur Churchill, Lord C. S Clerk, Sir G. Colborne, N. W. R. Coukes, T. H. Crawford, W. S. Cuteis, E. B. Lurteis, H. B. D'Albiac, Sir C. Denison, J. E. Dennistoun, A. Dillwyn, L. Vs. Dobbin, Leonard Donkin, Sir 11. Dunbar, George Elley, Sir J. Elphinstone, Howard Elwes, J. Entwistle, J. Ewart, W. Fa,cour , Major Fector, .tohn Fcllowes, lion. N. Fergus, Joan Ferguson, George Cole, non. A. Cole, Lord Archdall, General THE SPECTATOR. —Blennerbassett, A. RESIC-NED. Peel, W. Y. Peel, E. Pelham, Joh, C. Penruddock, J H. C. M. PigG', Robert F,Pli,igton, Lord 'Price, Samuel Crave Iticlia.rds, .1 Bohan's, A. W. ti~binsa n, G. R. ItotNieh • J. A. Booper, , J. a loss, C. Rus.di, Charles • Ruthven, Ityle, John Scott, Sir E. D. Scott, J. W. Scott, Lord Johrr Scourtield, W. IL Simeon, Sir IL Smith, B Smith, T. A. Somerset, Lord R. Stanley, H. T. Stewart, P. M. Stuart, Lord Dudley 'imps G. W. Tennent, J, B. Thomas, Colonel Thompson, Colonel Thompson, P. 13. Tooke, Withal* Townshend, Lord .1. Tracey, C. H. Trelawney, Sir W. Tulk, C. A. ace Tynte, C. K. Tynte, C. J. K. Vyvyan, Sir R. Walpole, Lord Wagon, Rigby Walter, J. West, J. B. Weyland, Major IVigney, I. N. Wilk., J. Williams, Sir J. Williamson, Sir 11. Wilson, Henry Wortley, J. S. Wrotte.ley, Sir J. (From the Edinburgh Pilot.) Most unwilling have we been to entertain a suspicion of the fidelity of this once efficient advocate of reform. We can hardly yet credit our senses or our conclusions. What confidence can the people henceforward cherish in their most zealous advocates? It is better, now, however, that the Spectator has avowed his adhesion to the Conservative (?) party. His calculations and quibblings will less dece4e. Till a change is manifest in the spirit and objects of the Spectator, we must class him with Sir Francis Burdett. the Times, and tl,o Deserters. We write these comments in literal anguish of mind ; it is with no design to malign or pervert the opinions of our once trusted and admired contem porary. Our admiration of the Spectator was sincere, and our vexation and disappointment are not less genuine. The people must henceforth work without his aid. The follow ing is his manifesto. Let him no more be called a Radical, but a Conservative (?) : " For our own part, we are humbly of opinion that I Conservative Government, however composed, will be found very much preferable to a Reform' Government, merely so called, existing upon many pretences, and the one reality of its alliance with Mr. O'Connell. Almost anything better than being cheated. A Conservative Governmeat will make no dupes, but will pass for what it really is. Under such a Government, the Reformers, no longer duped by fake pretences, must rely wholly upon their principles and themselves, which will be a great point gained. Joseph Hume will not pat the back' of a Conservative Ministry, but may be himself again, in his only proper place on the Speaker's left hand. Perhaps Lord Durham, excluded from a Conservative Government, may resume the policy lately called his ; but if he should not, others will' appro priate it. We mention these names in order only to indi cate the probability of a watchful, vigorous, and highly use ful opposition. Lastly, it will be strange if a Government avowedly Conservative, and, therefore, destitute of pre tences wherewith to gull the earnest Reformers, should not bid for popularity by promoting administrative improve ments. Practical improvements, we are satisfied, will be more attainable under a Government ostensibly opposed to Reform,' than under a Reform Government' merely so-called. The sham at en end, some some reality of good must needs occur. We, who have constantly regarded practical improvement as the end of all political exertion , and organic reform as a means only, can rejoice, therefore , at least as truly as the Melbourne Whig prints, at thenol obvious necessity of a Government essentially Conservat ive. CLOSE OF THE ELECTION. (From the Dublin Evening Post.) The General Election is now over ; and the general re sult is an ascertained majority of forty. During the progress of the elections we did not allow car partialities or our hopes to interfere with our calculations ; and we now find that we were perfectly right throughout , The Times and Standard, Chronicle and Globe, state the majority at forty. We think it totally superfluous to add a word on the mawkish and slobbering trash through which the Evening Mail, with the aid of a London Radical paper, is trying to puzzle for the purpose of showing that Ministers are in sa minority. But, with regard to the same Radical paper (Spectator), without which our Dublin Contemporary could not get along in its arithmetic, we have to observe, that it has been all alone an impugner of the Whigs, and quite as much in opposition as the Times and Standard—and , fighting under Liberal colours, it has, to its utmost, sought to damage what we may be allowed to eall the Liberal cause. Hence the use which Slop makes of it—hence its use to the English Tories. The cry of the Spectator, and of that section of Tory Radicals of which it is the organ, has been, and is this that Ministers were not Radical enough ; and that if they had been more Radical they would have the support of the country. Well, then, the General Election is the test. And what is the result, as regards the Radicals? Why, that, with one or two exceptions, the Radicals have been been driven with defeat from the hustings everywhere they appeared. One of the most able of them, Mr. Roebuck. was beaten by an immense Tory majority at Bath. The people of England are more Tory than Radical- - but they are more Reformers and Whigs than either. The constituencies of the towns have rendered this a demon strated proposition. Had Ministers taken the advice of the Radicals, there would at this moment be a Tory Admi nistration in England, and an Orange Government at the Castle of Dublin. God forgive us, if we be wrong—but we do believe, nevertheless, that this is the object of all the fine patriotic writing we see occasionally. With regard to the majority —we have said repeatedly► and we reiterate the assertion now—that the present is 11 better, is a more working, a more Ministerial majority than the last. It is a majority, too, we may fairly assume, that will increase. We have no apprehensions as to the determination of Ministers to do the needful. Their course is certainly as clear as it can be. After passing the Civil List, they have only to re-introduce the measures cushioned by the House of Lords during the last two or three years. With re gard to one of these measures, the Irish Corporation Bill, they will not, we suspect, find much opposition in the House Of Commons—and, indeed, we do not see why it might not be sent to the Upper before Christmas. In respect to the Church of Ireland Bill, it may happen that Ministers will find more difficulty in passing it through the Commons—but pass it they will. The Lords, perhaps , mny again throw it out. So much the worse for the Church—but we cannot see why they should resign, there fore. Nor will they. The Church Rate Bill will be so modified that there is every likelihood of its passing through the House of Com' - by a considerable majority ; and considering the moo.. straits to „,,, , t;eli the i Church is now reduced, by the almost the . rate, we imagine that the Lords general f t 9 o " r i e a t o go ' e -e‘ l 'Y t ►a..st• LADIES' GOLD WATCHES. -- A variety of excellent and carefully fluishe.i Ladies' Second-han d Gold Watches, many of them in accordance Hint the latest tast e, with Gold Dials, Awelled, &c., are offered for selectisn, price from Six to Eight Guineas emfb, at T. COX SAVORY'S, Watc h " maker, Gold and Silversmith, 47, Cornhill, London. N.B.—Second-hand Watches purchased in exchange B TB S. At Ilfracombe, the lady of Geo. Ilerbert, Esq., Commander of 11. M. S. " 'femeraire," of a daughter. On the 22d inst., in Gould-square, 11Irs. Ruts.ll. of a son. „ f On the 23d inst., at Q ueen - s quare, Guildford-stoet , the wire " R. Heathfield, Esq., of a son. Mz . On the 22d i ns t., at Trinity Church IRRIED ~ Sloane-street, Mr. Ji T V. Hardy, of M oru i n gton-crescent, to bliss G. A. Hurlstonet Chester -street, Belgrave-square. On the 22d inst.. at the Superintendent Registrar's Mice, Can" berwell, the Rev. John Dy er , Secretary of the Baptist MissionarY Society, to Mary, daughter of the late Mr. S. Jackson, of Dorki n i' On the 24th inst., at the Parish Church of St. biarylebonea Lodge, Esq., to the Right Hon. Lady Harriet Manners Sutton. On the 24th inst., at St. Maryiebone Church, George H enri Richardson, Youngest son of R. Cox, Esq., of Spondon Hall, Der ' byshire, to Suliana Mary Berners, youngest daughter of the ol e t, Rev. J. D. Plestow, of Wathington Hall, Norfolk, and of LO Berkeley -street, Portman-square. On the 2.3 d inst., at Newdigate, Surrey, Henry Thos. Lee, El' Dynas Powys, Glamorganshire, to Catherine Frances, fifth ter of J. S. Broadwood, Esq., of Lyne, Surrey. DIED. On the 22d inst , at Haileybury, Herts, Georgians Heniett4l° youngest daughter of the Rev. J. H. Batten, D.D., aged 13.., t a On the 21st inst., at Moor House, Limpsfie'd, Surrey , ' 4 l,d Admiral Robert .Gambier Middleton, one of the 11P— sioners of the Navy. On the 23d inst., at IA e, in Kent, Mr. Charles Courtengt is his 21st year. London: Printed and Published by MURDO YOUNG+ 112 ,Strand, at The Sun. Office, No. 112, Strand, tio of Middlesex.—Friday, August 25, 16.37. bleyo ell, H. Bateseg, Sir IL Jones, 'l'. Lucas, E. —Ellis, Dauer, lion. G Cooper E J. Perceval Colow t —Bateman, - -Alexander, Lord Corry, Right Hon.