The Sun. — London, England, 1812-06-25 00:00:00

LAW REPORT. CqUR T OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE 24. READ TAYLOR. This Was an action to recover damages for a ma : - ikious proSecution; The. same defendant having charged the plaintiff' (a clerk to him) with gross perjury. , The perjury charged being what he swore in affidavit in a case before the Court of Chancery, in which Waters was the plain tiff. In that affidavit he , swore, that certain sums paid to a 'Mr. Stones, Mr. Bestini, and veral other persons, were paid on the private account. of Mr. Taylor, and not to the joint ac count of the Opera concern ; Mr. Taylor denied in his answer to be the fact. Upon the indictment which was tried before Lord Ellen borough, the plaintiff was acquitted. A great number of witnesses were ,called this day to prove that the money was paid on the pri vate account of Mr. -Taylor by the plaintiff, and consequently that what he had sworn Was true. On the part of the defendant several witnesses were called, and the Chief Justice having sum 'vied up the case to the I - ttry, they' retired• for up- Wards of an hour and a half, and then returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 9001. FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE, JUNE 23, 1811. DIVIDENDS. July 21. W. Sharp, Bradford, York, calico-Manufacturer, at • two, at the Dog Tavern, Deansgate, Manchester. July 3. T. White, Liverpool, merchant, at twelve, at the Globe Tavern, Liverpool. July 48. It:Friday, jun: Isleworib, Middlesex, corn-dealer, at eleven, at Guildhall, London. - August 1. W. H. King, Fleet-lane, London, cabinet-maker, - at twelve, at Guildhall. July 13. R., Hamilton, Stalbridge, Dorset, linen-draper, at ' eleven at the 4.1 - ig - el Inn, Sherborre. 7 ,July 14. R. Saeiders Croydon, Strrey, cow-keeper, at eleven, at Guildhall, London. -Julyl4r T.; 'Freeman, Bury-street, St. Mary-Axe, "London, t...iaragra.sa-maker, at eleven, at Guildhall. • July 18. J. Hill, Peterborough, Northampton, draper, at elevyn, at Guildhall,' London. JUIY - 121'. IL Carter, Stephen-street, St. Pancras, Middlesex, carpenter, at., eleven, at Guildhall. July 14. B.- Boardman, Ipswich, Suffclk, shopkeeper, at twelve at Guildhall, London. • ' • - Jely 14. 4 ; Rowaey, Hatton-garden, Middlesex, perfumer, at twelve, at Guildhall, London. July 14. D. Robertson, Finsbury-square, Middlesex, wine - merchant, at eleven, at Gizildhall, London. July 14. J. Adams, and J. Spragg, Great St. Thomas Apostle, London, stationers,- at ten, at Guildhall. July . 14. J. Twibill,,.lllaccledield-street, Soho, Middlesex, -- e builder"and carpenter, at eleven, at - GUildhall, London. July 10. J. Forster, Whitehaven, Cumberland, merchant, at eleven, at the Black Lion, Wbitehaven July 14. G. B. Lansdale, Green-lettuce-lane, London, insu rance-broker, at twelve, at Guildhall. July 14. J. Spraggon and W. Spraggon, Gravesend, shop ,.keepers, t* tWel vr, at Guildhall,-London. • July 14. A. Lanchester, St. James's-street, milliner, at twelve, • at Guildhall, London. July 5..>5. C. S. Dudley, Gracechurch-street, London, mer chant, at one, at Guildhall. July 4. J. de Prado, Lime-street, London, lead merchant, at len, at Guildhall. July 14. It. Smith, H. Chesmer, and J. Down, Great Win chester-street, merchants, at twelve, at. Guildhall. July 18. S. Knight, Whitecross-street, clothfactor, at twelve, . at Guildhall. , Juiv 30. J. Maim, sen. Westleigh, Lancashire, butcher, at the Pied Bull Inn, Leigh, Lancashire. July -11. P. Lock, Nails - worth, Horsley, Gloucestershire, yarn maker, at eleven; at the Clothier's Arms, Nailsworth. July 28. It. Rippon, W. Lees, and T. Wilkinson, jun. Liver _ pool, merchants, at ten, at Guildhall, London. CERTIFICATES—CyGY 14.' J. Coles, Hannav-street, Oxford-street, jeweller. J. G. 'Weddell; Fen -court, Fenehnrch-street, corn-factor. J. Bryant, Ipswich, Suffolk, maltster. W; Reeves, Great Witcombe, Gloucestershire, corn-dealer. A. Davidson and J. Davidson, Jun. Smith Blyth,l Northum berland, ship-builders.. J. Jacobs, King James's-stairs, Wapping, victualler. t S. Atkins, Bridgewater-square, Barbican, watch case-maker. .1. Binns,Middlesex-strect, Somers-town, founder. A. Robe, Bristol, Soinersetshire merchant. W. thunphries, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, carpenter. J. Carter, Stratford-green, Essex, victualler. - T. L.. Bellamy, South-crescent, Alfred-place, Tottenham court-road, music and mus'cal instrument-maker. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. T. Farnworth and W. Nickson, Liverpool, shipwrights. A. Charles, G. Dickin, and - J. Badger, Old Jewry, London, wiile-merchants. S. Fiather (late Susan Newton), and E. Edwards, of Hanway street, O'xford-street, Slatter, T:.Wallington, and J. Mullett, Dye Mills, Ilmin- Apter, Somerset, tow-spinners. SILVER TOKENS. • The following table of the weight'and value of several of the- pro,vincial tokens, which at present form a part large part of the silver circulation, Las been drawn up by Mr. N(V.h, of the Assay OffiCe,.York, from the assays made by him. The intrinsic value is' said - to be calculated according to the present price of silver, (but the price is not mentioned) and-the weights. on an average of several pieces.. ,The 4th column states -the in feriority in every 12 oz. to standard silver :-- tvelight.r.WOref.intrin. • ,t. d. duls: gr. du is. 2 , 711(e. The Bank Dollar of 5 6 17 8 9 Ditto - 3 9 11 9 ll' .1 , The Gloucester - • The Newcastle , 2 6 - 7 3 The Hull 1 6 314 Ships, Colonies, & Commerce 1 6 318 The Doncaster 1 0 2lt ~The Leeds 1 0. 3 1 Thp Newcastle, by Robertson ...:1 0 222 The Newcastle, by Kelty l. 0. 218 The York I. 0 , 2 16 The Lincolnshire . ... The Whitby 1 '0 216 'The West Riding ...1 0 216 The Scarborough' - 1 0 '2.16 The Stockton..... , ' ~ 1 0 • 2 16 The Newark 1 0 2 12' TLe Sheffield • ' 1 0 - 2 23 'The Shaftesbury The London .(Warren's) 1 0 215 The Bristol 1 0 .2 16 The Bridlington • 1 0 210 The Derby 1 0 212 ,;The Lincoln 1 0 213 The G-ninsbroo r ;il 1 o_, 3, - 1 The Charing Cross ) London 1 o' ' ' 2 7 'I he Stamp Office - , The Beadford 1 0 220 The rozely T . York . !The Britannia . The Hall. • 'I he Derby • 10 2 8 06 1 5 0 6 1, 7 06 1 6 06 1 2 A most excellent arra.ugement has taken place, a - nd will be notified:officially . from tlie War Office, f )1. granting Pensions to Officers wouinled severely, or who haire lost•an eye or limb in the service.— Vile scale of pensions 'will be frorn 4001. per ann. -the.highest to a General, and 501, the lowest to an EtiNign, and intermediately according to regimen tax rank. LONDON: Printed by THOMAS WOOD; 9f N 0.35, MtiEicri-lane r Covent-garden; anti At the Sus Okrzcz, No.. 7'12, St ra nd, e 1 4(tvertisoniants, Onkrs fo. the thoffeeileolleCtihg tith's, and afterwards, that they -were to be. attributed to the : landlords, and not to tie tithes. Certainly he (Mr. is.) did state what he had now no difficulty of , repeating, and What he had. formerly . so artell stated, that the Clamours athong the lower orders of the peo ple in - Ireland against the tithes, arose from their not understanding the subject, and from not knoW ing the . nature,. of the tithes. For he did think, that•thet system must be ranch more convenient to the Irisli peasantry, and much more popular, which' only took - from them one-thirtieth instead of one-tenth of the produce of their lands. He . . was' warrented, therefore, in saying, that the common people of Ireland were - ief . norant of the nature . of the subject, and thateteey were not aware thet be removing wlit. they were pleased to call their present grievances, they would make themselves liable to a greater burthene becease., as he observed hte.fOre, if the House were to make any regulation upon this subject, the foundation. of it must be the legal demand of the clergy to one-tenth of the produce. That, he repeated, must be the foundation of the measure if any al teretion were attempted. But his ,Honourable Friend hild stated that he (Mr. P.) had maintain ed that the tithe system was a great grievance in Ireland, and' then:that lie (Mr. P.) was guilty of an inconsistency in stating that the whole cause of the'diffieulty lay on the-landlords, -and not on the system of tithes. Now ilk! would beg leave to state his own explanation upon this point, , in the outset of that sptech which was the ,subject of the Honourable Gentlerrian's animadversion,- he did take the libaty of7stati4g, that. if there was a reasonable degree of-foundation for thostealleged grieveoces, it was an object riorit near aed dear to him (for that washis ea:ln.:en:ion). to put the people of Ireland on a better condition ie that respect ; but he (Mr. P.) found it utterly impracticable; for when he came to consider more nearly the state of thOse people, he did abSekve, that un luestionably a great part of the misery they suf fered was owing to What were gilled the middle men, These were the observations to which the Honourable Gentlemarnha.d Made so much' objec tion. But, neverthelesS, he still mainteined the same opinion ; and ,first, he Would'undertake to shew why the system of tithes -in Ireland Was less obnoxious to the people • than other sinirceetf complaint ; and he would stew that they oppress ed the people in a less degree than seemed to be" imai.eieedj and that they were by no means the cause of the real harship of Which ,the common people of is at country complained. Of this muel, however, , he would again assure th e Honourable Gentleman, that if he would point out any meat sure at all commensurate with the object he had in view, he would most cordially support him.— With eegard'tn these Middle men, his • Honour able Friend stated th a t it was a most extra- , ordinary thing that any Irish Gentleman shetild find anj*. fault with the persons call el the Middle Men. Now there vas an other terin ...which naturally . arose out of the system of Middle men, and to which, in fact, their conduct had given rise. Did the Hon. Gentleman' ever hear of the Land Pirate-men ? Surely the Hon.. Gentleman could rot deny the existence of such persons. These were not the persons who were to be considered as the respect :able land-owners of the country, who gave their tenantry fair - play. He would ask, was it to be supposed that such landlords as he now saw in that House were - the sort of lendlords of which complaint was made in Ireland ? The' supposition was so offensive that be would net venture to en= tertain it. But what, he Would - ask, were the distressing cireumstancee which accrued some times from the Leasing systeln, as it bad' been called in this country ? There w ere f ew I r i s h Gentlemen in the House ignOrant of its effects. He wouldju.st put it to the Hon. Gentleman him- Self, for he could _not be ignorant Of that system; suppose he were to let a farm or three or 400 acres to a Solvent tenant, ti: - inch :solvent tenant, though a very good man, lets the same faun for three lives to another man. He (Mr.T.) would not suppose that the Hon. Meinher would in these times let such a farm for, so long a period at the same rent. 13nt he would suppose that such a farm vas let for one life or fora term of years this person then lets the same fArnvat'an incireas ed rent, subdivided into other farms for different periods : these minor tenement! are perhaps hand ed over to other landlords; till atlast they come to what are called the Land Pirates and it often 'happened at' last that the actual occupier of the land had to pily two, three, four, five; Or six . rents. Surely then, the complaint of the tithe systeni must be a matter of very inferior consideration Unconnected With any other cause of complaint. fie thought it necessary to state so much respeet ing what his Honourable Friend had. said on the subject of What•he (Mr. P.) stated as. to the land lords' system in Ireland. In - fa`t., there was no one subject that his Hon. 'Friend had touched upon, relating to any remedy that 'could be pro posed on this subject, that did not apply to one or other . of the arguinents that had been hereto fore urged upon the 'question, and that was not anticipated by. every poison who gravely Consider ed the subject. For his own part, he had un questionably looked at it with the utmost anxiety ; he had considered, with the most cautions delibera- / . - • tion, all the circumstances - that had been urged on every occasion the subject had been discussed ; he had bstowed a patient. investigation on all the plans and views that had been suggested by different Gentlemen : in short, he had examined the subject-with the most minute attention, and the result of that inquiry, in his , Mind, had been a conviction that any change or alteration in the condition of the . people' of - Ireland on the parti, cular subject, founded upon the propositions hitherto maintainecl, would put them in a . - worse_ situation than they were a t this moment. For one, it was his firin opinion that if any such plan were attempted to be carried -into execution, in stead of ameliorating 'their condition; it would aggravate their alleged grievances. In .so saving, however be did not mean to admit that the people of Ireland were in a bad situation for lie would say, that with - respect-to' tithes in Ireland, com pared, with th tithe system in England., the result would be found to be 'greatly in favour of Ireland. tet any thin &Oznpare the tithe lawa Of the one with these of the other country, and h would, iScon seethat there was a large :balance in favout=, of the Irish. The' Irish IlleW nothing of Sit% tithes ; and in a large proportion of that country they only knew the tithesupon hay by name ; anci „above all, the whOle of the pasture land of the country was exempt from the consequences of that institution, This, he thought, it was necessarY to have stated upon the subject of tithes.in the two countries. 'He bad also ventured to state that he thought It would be found that any person who looked - narrowly into this. subject, would find the difficulties opposed in his - way insurmountable. Tre had used every argument in his power to in- . duce_his ITon. Frie n d t o turn his mind to the subject'. butlie could net help"regretting, that his Hon: Friend after having taken so much- time to 'consider it, had come down to the House with.; out producing any other effect from his Cogita tions than the very same propositio n w hi c h h e had heretofore on . former occasion laid befoFe the House,. and to w hi c h th e sense of Parliament had been decidedly, opposed. He would now re peat as he had often repeated, that as long as.he shOuld have the honour of _a seat in that. House, and- his Honourable Friend could find or desire any measures whie'a he really-thought equal to the objects which he had in view, and should bring them before the H ouse in the sh a pe •a Bill, lie pledged himself to meet it fairly anu dispos sionately. He would in all events be ready to debate clause by ::.louse, and if he could, he would . sup port it in its. last enacting stage - : but he should not act fairly if he did not state his hUmble opi -Ilion that it was impossible to bring forward an of that kind ; and i lle thought the Honse would agree - with . him iliac there was wore difficulty in , the matter than. at first struck the, view, because his Honourable Friend, w4l. all his talents, assiduity, labour, and knowledge of the subject, and all the systems and plans over devised upon the 'topic before him, _and with the aide as sistauce Of the Right Ron. Gentleman, the her for Dublin, bad not been able, alter three years consideration (this being the third year the subject was brought before Parliament), to - bring forward any measure which _ the -wisdom of the Parliament could adopt. Upon the grounds,. , therefore, the Honourable Gentleman 11h-itself bed; stated,, and after a' p a ti en t cons id erat i on of the by which the question was_ environed, he felt that he, must giVe his vote against' the motion. LIST of the MINORITY on Mr. CANNING's MOTION 'oct Tuesday last. Adams, C. *Fellowes., W. H. I Peel, R. Addington, rt. bn.J. *Ferguson, James' Plutn.er, Sir T. Agar, Capt. E. F. *Featherstone, SirT Price, Sir C. *Apsley, Lord Finch, Hon. Gen. Rainer, Capt....l. Artshdall, Gen. M. Fitzliarris, Visc. *Rochfort, G. H. Baker, P. W. Fitzliurrh, W. Rose, G. H. Bath a - rst, at. hon.B. Glscoyrie, Gen. T. Ryder, rt. hon. R. "Beau:::::ont, Col. T. Giddy, Davies Shelly, 'F. Pt . :is - on, R. Gbulboura, H. Shitinzill Beniinck,LordC.W;,*HarveYJ Admiral Sloane ,:XT'.. *Bernard, Visc o unt *Heatheote, T. F. *Sue-yii , N. *Blackburne, J. *Hirichingbroke, V s *S omerse t, L or d A. Mackburne, J. T. *Hotablon, J.A. Stewart, It. Pouverie, C. H. Jenlainson, Hon. C. & - erlitl:4, fir W Burrell, Sir.C.NI. Kenrick, W. ' Shaw, S.r J. • Barton, F. King, Sir J. D. Strutt col. J. K. Calvert J. *Leslie, C o l. C . *Sumner, G. H. • Chaplin ) C. Leycester, H. Spies Sir M. Chaplin, C. inn. Lockhart, J. J. homson, *Cholinondeley, T. Loft, Gen. Thynue, Lord J. *Chute, W. Tioftus, Gen. *Tremayne;J. , *Clements, Col. H. LoWther, Viscount Verelker, Col. Clive, Viscount *Lowther, J. Vyse, Capt. R. Coke, D. P. *Lowther, Col. J. Wallace, rt. tin. t: • -Chmoton, Viscount LuShington, R. S. Walpole, Lord Curtis, Sir W. *Lygon, Hon. W. *Wersycs" Gert..• . e Davenport, D. , *Mac Naghten, E. Wi gram , W. Davis, Hart Magens, M. D. Williams, R. Drake, Thos. T. Manners, Gen. Yorke, rt.. hon. - Drake, W. T. Mexhorough, Earl Yorke, Sir-J. *Drummond Milnes, R. P. TELLERS. *Drummond -• Monta.oe, M. Nicholl, rt. ha.Sirff , Dufferin, 'Lord Moore'Lord H. Yorke, rt. hon. C. Egerton ' J. Morris, It. - 'PAIRED OFF. ,Ellison, Col. R. Nicholl s rt. hn.SirJ. La.seelles, hon. IL Estcourt, Thos. G. Norton, Hon. Gen. Lefevr?, C. 5. *Fane J. . , his. T. R. Newark, Vise.. 'Farquhar, James Onslow,•hn. Col.• T. * Those art County Members. It is generally admitted that the most ‘listiff guished speeches in the late debate on the Catho' lie Question were, on the one side, Mr. BA" THUIIST'S, as a specimen of 'close and powert4. argument, and Mr. CANg.trro.'s reply, as.a ‘pf.tc-e of brilliant eloquence. From the latenesS of the hour at which those Gentlemen respectively rose, those speeches have, of course, been ina.dequatelf reported.' .• On Monday last, in Loiver Brook-street, the Lady of the Right Hon. Lord W. Beauclerk, of a Son. •• On the 9:.;;ql . . t .inst. at he:e father's house in Bloomsburg sqnnre, :the Lady olltalph Deane, Esq. of a Son. On. Tuesday, at • their •house in Weymouth-street, .111:rs. • Charles Bevan, of a Son. at; MR. W. Pat. the value of tithes is different entirely from- the value of lands in their relative mode' of purchase. IU this last year, •the value of tithes 1n Ireland his in&nne. He would be remunerated in the first instance by forcing him to commute his tithes, and in the .next place robbing him of above a quarter of his,- property. : And he would beg the House to look to the operatidn ofthis system as it respected the Statute of Mortmain ; because by this means free and unlimitted permission would be given to the aggregation of lands in .11lortnilain, in Ireland. These, he thought, were sonic of the circumstances which would be produced by the intended ,plan of his Honourable Friend, - if carried into execution. Having said so mud!, he really felt it was unnecessary for bilis to trouble the House- any more at length on the present oc casion : but there were one or two other obscr- ✓ vT 0 -8 0 •q, O 4 * O 44 O :3+ vation of the Honourable Gentleman, of ‘Vhich it might be necessary to take some notice. His Hon. Friend had challenged him, he thought, with some feeling of rebuke, for the apparent in consistency of his conduct on this question—That he (Mr. P.) had first stated that Abe, grievances complained of by the Irish peasantry. arose froT. [Concluded from our Vaper of Yesterday.] To what extent Avonld the proposition ,of his Honourable Erica. go ? Estimating therefore, as he- did, that the, average profit of the Clergy was one-thirtieth of the produce' of the land, to what an alarming extent would the measure of the HonOurable Gentleman go, if it were to be adopted. Became, in making his pronosed esti mation, the clergyman must have the full value of his tithe. He dust have a tenth of the, prodnce of the .land. The fi rs t difficulty, therefore, that presented itself would be, how the Honouiable Gentleman could reconcile tle,se wfio have been. accustomeg hitherto to pay only one-thirtieth port of the produce:of their land, to pay in future one-tenth. And this must be the necessary con sequence, if that was given which was by law . due to the Clergy. But the Honourable Gentleman set out upon . a false principle ; ,because be stated that he wanted to do strict justice between the parties ; but to do this, the Honourable Gentle man was not to; set . mkt, under the present cir cumstances of the case, to estimate by what the people had a eight to pay, but by what they now did pay., , And yet this was the Mode by which the Honourable Gentleman Would remedy the evil complained of, and alleviate• the distresses of the Irish peasantry. This was the first proposition, and the House would - judge of its , justice. ,The next proposition which the Hoilourable Gentle man suggested was to tithe the value, Of every acreable tithe, and this was to be done7 : without any reference at all to the value of land, or any alteration in the value of money. The Comais sioners were, in the first instance, to look at the value as he (Mr. P.) had stated it to be, on the average, one-thirtieth ; and in order to remove from the people of Ireland the burthen i)f tithes, and in order to do justice to the Clergy,thiS objeet was to be obtained by compelling 'the former to pay one-tenth e instead of one-twentieth, or one thirtieth of the value of the produce of their lands. But he would call the attention'olthe House to what he-would term the injustice of - this acreable tax or tithe ; and that it, was unjust:-was to be in ferred from the circumst an ce of its having been formerly tried, 'hut given up. The propOsition was, to,--take the tithe, as it is called, from the Clergy, and remunerate them by an acreable tax. Now, he.would ask, in what a situation would a large portion of Ireland be placed by the substitu tion %)f this system ? One quarter •of the whole of,that country was completely exempted from tithes ; and by the Act of Union it is declared that those lands which were so exempt at the time of the - passing of that Act, shouht be for ever tithe free. " [Sir John Newport expressed soiree _ surprisehere.] He would tell the Honourable Baronet that what was law in Ireland ;11 . 1800, was,continued to be the law of that country by the Act of Union. He must suppose, from the surprise the Honourable Baronet evinced, that this was information to him ; but .he was always happy to contribute to the illumination of his mind . (a laugh). • But the first operation of this proposition was to remunerate the Clergyman, after taking away his tithe by an acreable tax on his parishioners. what,, he would ask, must ; be the effect of this ? He would suppose that one quarter of the land of the parish was pasturable land, and the other three quarters arable and mea dow lands. In the first place, this acreable tax would he an act of the grossest injustice to every man who held an acre of pasture land ; because, by law, that sort of land was utterly free and ex empt from tithe : and, in the next place, it would be just as unfair to make the man who has the worst land in the parish, pay the same t a x With the man who had the best. The man who had the finest field of wheat would pay no more than, the man who had the worst field of barley. But this was not all.. By this propositioh all the hay in Ireland would be to pay this tax. Now one half of Ireland by law pays no hay tithe to the Clergy. In same parishes the tithe on hay was given on very small proporti on , an d i n o th ers no t a t all.— Therefore it was he said that the Honourable Gentleman had grounded his argument up'on false principles of justice because be would make those Who were exempt by law from paying tith'es, p`ay, a tax which in justice they ought not-to pay : and again, he would make those pay large tithes who were now subject only to pay very small ones.— These, he confesied, were some of the difficulties whiCh threw themselves in the way of this altera tion in the system. An Hon. Gent. who by the way was rather irregular in his observations, suggested the expediency of remunerating the clergy by land. " Then;" said ; the Honourable Gentle- man, ‘f you.have it : this is the true way of re munerating them." ,But he would beg leave to doubt that mode of remuneration also. He would tell that Honourable Gentleman, that in Ire4nd was at fourteen years purchase, and the value'of land was at twenty. How, then, was the clergy man- to be remunerated. In the first place, he' would be forced to sell his tithes at Totirteen years, and to purchase land at twenty years :.and by that means he would be robbed of near a third of MARRIED, On Tuesday the lGth lint. at St. - James's Church, Captain Arthnr Blake,-.of his Majesty's 24th Regiment of Foot, to Charlotte the youngest dal:A:liter of the late John Knights Esq. of Ifilary-House, in the County of D.C.."471.1.. The same morping, at the Ch.pro-li of St. Mary-le-honves Major Eetward P.lrkinson, of the :32i1 Rf. , glinent of Foot; to Eliza, daughter of Charles Bunny, of Ilowland-wefts Fitzro7-square: Cu Saturday last, at St. Clement's Cl;nrch, in the Strand, Francis Paget Watson, Esq. to Miss Melody Royston, of 10' 7 barn. Ori Simday last, .at St. Catharine Cree, Mr. James of the New England corre2-pause, to Ann,. daughter og' , Mr. NO'hert Anherry, of St. Mary-Axe. On i‘londay last, at St. Margaret's, .Westminster, Mr. JG''' seph. .Iphn Shelton, of Flurse-hiN, near Reigate Surrey, to Mary Ann, second dangl.ter of jnalCs Fittler, Esq. 01 Upper Charlotte-street,Fitzry-squai-e. , - At St. George's, Hanover-vot , i.re, by spe.ciol count Asithroolc, ,to el - dea. daughter of Sir . Theophil ts Nlctehlfe, of ,Pert-hill,' Beii s.• On Wednesday, in the Parish Church cif-St. Paneras, listen Croome, t.U. of On reeester, in •Gloucestershire, to :Niis 4 Girdier, of CUpper Chaklette-t,treet, ••Fitzroy-stitiare. Mr - Greenwich, this day, Mr. W. Poyner, of Cannop-street , to Sarah Stapleton, of Lodge, Greenwich. ntEn Published by WILLIAM ARMIGER SCRIPPS, South Molton-street, - Grosvenor-aqua; ,r the Paper, Lttters forlbe Editor, &c. (post pakl), must be addressed. On Tuesday the 16th .inst. at - Clasernont, near Slyansop Henrietta, the wife of Sir John Morris, Bart. 'On the IBth inst. at I-Ja6ley, in the year of her ace, 'Mrs. Hopegood, relict of Andrew ilopegood, year On Friday - last, at her house .in Upper Grosvenor-street, the 6411 year of her age, Mrs. Boller, the widow of Jaine 9 Buller, Esq. late of Downes, in Devoush:re, and Shelling-- hero, in Cornwall. .• • On Monday last, in, College- Green, Bristol, Mr. N Surzeon.' • the 22d inst. at Windsor, the infant daughter of the: Rev. fingh'Pears'on. ' , Yesterday morning, in Clement's-lane, of a decline, Mr' Thninas _ - • Lately, at Clinden Town, in the 4701 year of her age' Mary, the wife of .\if. Jackson; of that place.