The Sun. — London, England, 1852-06-03 00:00:00

FEARFUL SHIPWRECK. (From the New York Tribune.) The barque Josephs, of Gloucester, England, Captain Cawsey, left Bristol on the 19th of March, 1852, with a cargo of railroad iron, s white-lead, kins, &c , bound for Boston. Her crew, all told, consisted of eighteen persons, and all young men. Up to the day of her wreck she bad a short and pros perous voyage, and made Cape Anne Light at twelve o'clock on Monday night, April 19. The night being thick and foggy, and an easterly gale blowing, the captain stood off on a south-easterly course, and, when he judged himself far enough out, tacked, and ran in, intending to make Cape Cod, and so up the bay. The fog was extremely thick. The vessel had approached the coast so nearly that in tacking, after sounding and finding 15 fathoms, the ship was on the edge of the breakers, and struck on the outer bar, about half a mile to the northward of the Highland Light, Cape Cod. This was about three o'clock in the after noon of Tuesday, April 20. She probably struck her bows first, then healed off and lay on her beamends, and, after a few seas had struck her, which, after a long easterly storm, run with fearful violence on the outer bar, her starboard quarter broke off. In the meantime the pinnace bad been got out, and lowered from the starboard side, but this boat, as well as the longboat, was instantly stove and swept off by the violence of the seas. Her decks now gave way from the stem to the foremast ; her main and mizenmast went overboard, and her larboard side fell in on the railroad iron with which she was freighted. She was six years old, of about 600 tons burden, built chiefly of larch and other north -country wood, in a heavy and substantial mode, and ironed with heavy braces, iron knees, and other iron fasten eiings, which, added to the enormous weight of t h e railroad iron in her, made her almost a complete anchor in herself ; yet, such was the terrible force of the sea that runs on the outer bar, she was carried over that and brought up on the inner bar. In this situation she lay, so thick was the fog, without any one on her seeing the shore, or being seen from it, though only about 300 yards distant, until about five o'clock, the sea making a breach over her, when three boys who we re walki ng the beach, the fog now lifting a little, saw her, and proceeded to the Highland Light and informed Mr. Hamilton, the keeper of the light, of the fact. The cries of persons were also heard from the wreck. The keeper of the light got out the articles belong ing to the aumane Society, such as life-preservers, india-rubber coats, caps, and ono of the rockets de posited at the light for the purpose of throwing a rope from the shore to the vessel, and went down to the beach opposite the barque, where the people from Pond Village, in Truro (about one mile from the beach), were soon assembled. The men could be plainly seen clinging to the larboard aide of the ship, and their cries for assistance are represented as being heartrending beyond all imagination, the spray flying over the foremast, which was still standing. The people of Truro are distinguished for their hospitality to strangers, and their sympathy with those in distress, and the only feeling. was to render assistance to the persons on board. But it was plain that not only must succour be speedy, bat it could be of no ordinary kind. The lifeboat of the Humane Society for, this town is kept in a boathouse about one mile from the spot where the ship struck, and preparations were now made to bring this up to the spot, and also to fire the rocket. In the meantime, at about seven o'clock, two men from Pond Village, in Truro—Jonathan Collins and D. H. Cassity, both young, the latter 23 years of age, and the former about 35—procured a fisherman's derv, so-called, belonging to the lighthouse, and avowed their intention to peril their own lives in an attempt to save the unfortunate men exposed before their eyes to immediate death. The resolve was a most hazardous one, and the experienced per sons present entreated them not to ge. When a heavy sea is running on the outer bar the in-shore surf is a little diminished, and there was little doubt, as every Cape Codman le a master of his boat, that their frail dory could be successfully launched and carried over the shore wave; but, as aNr an easterly storm, long continued, the current at this point sweeps with irresistible violence to the north, and the sen was making a breach over the vessel, it was considered certain death to approach the eddy near the ship; in spite of all remonstrance, however, these heroic young men went off through the surf, and approached within about 15 yards of the bark, near enough to speak to those on board, when the dory capsized in stantly, "like a baeirs,” to use the expression of a by stander, and nothing more was seen of the two men in her. The rocket for throwing a rope over the vessel was now got ready, as the lifeboat had been brought down, the plan being in such cases to get a line to the ship, if possible, then to ply between the shore and the vessel in the lifeboat. The rocket has a much larger stick than the common rocket, to which a line is attached, and a heavy charge to carry it a suffi cient distance. It was now fired by Simuel jun., and G. T. Lewis, when the charge exploded, and burst the chamber, instead of carreieg the rove to the ship, thus endangering the lives of those who fired it, ae well as the bystanders, the stick going over the bank to the leeward. It wee almost a miracle that no lives were lost by the explosion of the iron chamber, when the amount ef the charge is consi dered, and the immediate vicinity of the persons. It was evident now that nothing more could be done from the shore, unless the lifeboat could be got off. But it was evident, after the experiment with the dory, which had ended fatally, that the attempt would be in every probability pertectly ur'successful —the cnly hope of safely carrying off a lifeboat being by the aid of a rope from the vessel. The lifeboat at North Truro is a large and beevy boat, and ,difficuit to manage, in the inshore, sure, where facility of execution is indispensable, and one half moment's delay might sweep off• boat and crew, and, as it was now dark, and breezing up, no further attempts could be made to communicate with the vessel. Fires were built on the shore to show the unfortu nate persons on board that they were not forgotten, and companies f)rined to walk the beach. The awful cries of the crew for aid, and the cracking of the large timbers as the ship tinnily broke up, were heard at a house about half-a: mile from the beach, in spite of the terrible surf, which crashed like the heaviest thunder on the echoing shore, and the remorseless beating of the tempest. At about eleven o'clock the lightkeeper returned to the beach, having gone at ten to the light to trim his and sew a man kneeling before one of the fires, who proved to be one of the crew of the barque George Chetnay, and, on being asked if any of his companions had been saved, be informed the light one other wee lying near the water ; k th e e eoe la r tt t er, t oJasper, was in a dying condition, much bruised about the feet, and would not have lived ano ther halt_ Both of these men were taken to the lighthouse, on e ur. atile off, in about two hours, by the exertions of of itlilton and his companion, the Rev. Mr. Lord, h Truro, the bank above the beach being 100 feet hi 'of yielding sand, and Jasper unable to help himself. When the foremast gave wa the two men who thewere saved went over with broadside • and, though washed off two three ortimes, and although the rigging caught in the mile the wreck, and kept them for an hour and a half by from which they saw their fourteen companions eweoff, th tually went ashore nearly opposit e t t e t Wreck ey elen cared for at the were most ample? l ighthouae b They Hamilton and his wife. Six bodies of the y Mr. crew have been since recovered and buried at ? remit , and also that of D. a Cassity, at tee uce-town, irth Truro. rished in this t e • Thus sixteen persons Pe , usable ship wreck, and two of our own fearless and h ero i c ce Cod fishermen, in a bold attempt to save the lives of their brother sailors THE LORD .HIGH COA TyRO OD. S CEPTION AT Comm is s i on er , Lest night his G race the Lor d Leigh held a reception in the Palace'.of oI Y rood, which was n d o attended by 1,400 o f t h e nobility an entry, including as exeep. of course, a vast num b er o f c l e rgy. with the tion of the similar ceremon i a l s t h a t took place daring the visit of Georg e th e Fourth, it i the old walls of Holyrood witnessesci ver y brilliant $ long since - 0 scene. The reception took place in, thu Picture parties on arrival being conduct e d th rou gh the corridors in the court to the south-east s t a i rcase t o the ga llery. The throne was placed in the south end of the gallerY , and the company, on passing b e f ore hi s G race , moved down into the body of the room, and through the small apartments at the western elle, w hi c h we re also thrown open. Between ten and twelve o'clock, when the greatest numbers were present, the appearance of the antique hall was brilliant in the extreme. An im mense number of handsome chandeliers poured a blaze of light-on the dim (Ad walls—the grim effigies of royalty with which they are panelled contrasting strangely with the gay crowd that moved ceaselessly to and fro beneath them. The sombre dress of the clergy and laity was amply relieved by the brilliant robes of the ladies, and the gold scarlet glories of unifor ms , o f "thigh there was a largo proportion, Through the deeply recessed windows the music of military bands floated up from the inrer court, micgling with the thousand tongued hum of conversation murmuring within. In short, leavin g out of view the brief preliminary cere mony of presentation, the gallery presented all the ap pearances of ft crowdqd assembly or bail, with the im portant excepti on of then being no dancing, end with the added interest of the hi • • I g roun d whic h k s.oriee on it 00 place—the Picture te ery of Holt rood being no ordinary or modern hell-room. It was all as bright and gay. however, if it was an erection of yester day, gloom s hro u di ng t h e day, and it *as only the indomitable heavy outer walls and towers, and lurking in the moon light shadows of the pinnacles and archea of the ruined chapel that recalled the genius and meories of the place. A strong feeling of gr,at,i.tade to' the - Earl of Mansfield for having SO hilecP3s.lnY revivei something of the ancient grandeurs of Holy rood, wos the unani mous sentiment of those who witnessed the -ery striking and animating display • thq reception "Wm - [The following appeared in our Third Edition of last night:—] FRANCE. The Paris correspondent of the Times says in his letter of yesterday (Tuesday) evening The re ports in circulation this afternoon, or rather repeated for the third, or fourth time, but for the correctness of which it is impossible to v ou c h, turn on a reduction of the army to the amount of 50,000 men, a compro mise of the Orleanist confiscation at the instance of M. Fould, and the return of that gentleman to office, and the abolition of the new Ministerial department of General Police, and a consequent saving. I give the rumours with all due hesitation as to the truth of the greater part of them." The Corps Legislatif met yesterday at two o'clock, under the presidency of M. Billault. After the adop tion of the proces•verbal, the President observed that the labours of the Assembly would shortly become extremely important, and invited the Deputies to ab stain from demanding leave of absence, in order that they might always be in number to deliberate. M. Vernier next laid on the table the report on the Bill relative to the repression of crimes and offences committed abroad by Frenchmen. The report was ordered to be printed and distributed, and the di sc u s sion fixed for Friday. The next order of the day Was the discussion on th e pro j ect f or t h e definitive settlement of the accounts of 1848. No Member having asked to speak on the subject, the different articles of the Bill were read by the Presi dent, and adopted without opposition. The ex penditures for that year were definitively fixed at 1,746,660,504 f. DT. Brohier moved, before the bal lot should commence, that the remarkable report of committee charged with examining those accounts should be inserted in the Moniteur. "It is neces sary," he said, " that France should know what re volutions and the fallacious promises of revolutionists cost; it will be a useful warning to the country." The insertion was ordered by the Chamber, and the ' Bill was subsequently adopted by 180 to 1. The President next announced that, on Friday, the As sembly would hear the report on the accounts of 1849, and that, previous to the public sitting, it would have to appoint a special committee to verify the ac counts of the Corps LegislaY: The Chamber then adjourned at three o'clock. Letters from Marseilles, dated the day before yes terday, state that M. Joachim Murat, son of Prince Lucien Murat, had arrived at that city on his return from Florence to Paris. It is added that be is the bearer of " important" dispatches for the Govern ment. He had a long conference with M. Sy Train Blot, Inspector-General of the Police Department at Marseilles. Letters from the same city announce that the Louqsor entered that port the day previous, having his Highness Said-Pacha, hereditary Prince of Egypt, on board. The Louqsor had not entirely complete its quarantine. Various causes are assigned to the visit to France of Said-Pacha. The Firebrand, English steamer - of war, also ar rived at Marseilles the same day, proceeding from Port Mahon, and bringing dispatches from Admiral Dundas, Commander-in-Chief of the English squadron in the Mediterranean, to the Government. The Fire brand will await at Marseilles the arrival of dispatches from Londfm, which she will take back to Mahon. It is remarked that this is the second extraordinary express within ten days which arrived at Marseilles with dispatches from Admiral Dundas. The Tribunal of Correctional Police is frequently called upon to award damages for injuries inflicted by dogs and other animals, for which the owners are civilly responsible, but it is rather a novel thing far it to be called on to do so in the case of a lobster. Such, however, was the case on Saturday, when a dealer in shellfish at the fish-market was summoned by a Mme. GaEBUCHST, who. claimed 301. damages for the in , jury caused to her nose by one of the defendant's lobsters. It appears that the plaintiff, wishing to re gale her husband with a tit-bit for his dinner, went to the market, and was bargaining for a lobster, which she took up in her hand, but threw it down again, saying it was. not fresh. The dealer protested that it.. was alive, but Mme. GEBBITCEIET asserted the contrary, and that it even stunk. To satisfy herself that such was the case, she a second time applied her nose to it, when the lobster, ES if in defence of its owner's veracity, seized hold of Mme. GREBUCIIET'S' proboscis with its claw, and held it fast.. She screamed for assistance, hue, instead of iinriaediatidy giving it, the dealer and her compan:oos %mond bUrst out into a laugh, and it was some little time before the nose of the lady could be released. The fishwoman in her defence main tained that she was not to blame, and that the mischief was solely caused by the imprudence of Mme. GEE BUCHET, iq applying her nose so close to the lobsteek claw, when she had been told that it was alive; and the Tribunal taking the same view of the case, the complaint was dismissed, and the plaintiff ordered to pay the costs. S UN, GERMANY. The Nassau Gazette of the 26th ult., states, that apartments have been engaged at Wiesbaden for the Count DE CHAMBORD and that he is expected th ere in a few chys, and will stay two rnontb3. The Engli-h congregation at Wiesbaden hare just presented to their chaplain, the Rev. J. A. LEICESTER, A.M., an edition of Scott's " Commentary on the splendidly bound, and upwards of thirty volumes of the best theological works, as a mark of the high sense they entertain of the zeal and efficiency with which he has discharged his duties for the two years th a t h e h as b een th e i r minister. The junior members of th e congrega ti on , g ratefu l for Mr. LEI CESTER'S unceasing exertions for their religions in struction, have also spontaneously subscribed to offer the Reverend Gentleman a token of remembrance upon his resigning the chaplaincy. S WITZERLAND. The Swiss journal, the Bund, asserts that the ac count given of the signing of the protocols in Lon don relative to Switzerland is incorrect. This journal pretends to know that the* great powers have not recognised the rights of Prussia over Neufchatel to the extent implied in the accounts in question. - SIR HARRY SMITH AT PORTSMOUTH. PORTSMOUTH, JUNE 1.-A second address has been presented to-day to Lieutenant-General Sir Harry;Smith. That presented yesterday was from the corporation; the one presented to-day aas adopted at a large meeting of the inhabitants of the borough generally. It was pre sented by the Mayor in the Guildhall, a large number of people being present. Is was as follows:- " To Lieut.-General Sir Harry Smith, Bart. " Gallant Sir,-The inhabitants of the borough of Portsmouth approach you with their warmest congratu lations on your safe return to England after a service of unequalled difficulty, which, by a rare combination of political sagacity and military valour, you have brought apParently to a successful termination. It was with feelings of great confileace in your abi lity for that arduous undertaking that they addressed you in 1847, on your departure from this port for South Africa, to assure you of the sympathy and ad miration with which they regarded you; and they now welcome you most heartily on your return home from that harassing service, and congratulate you on the sub jugation of that desperate horde of savages, who had ao long carried on their desolating warfare against her Majesty's subjects in those parts. And now, gallant sir, in conclusion, we express a fervent hope that the same Almighty power that has hitherto protected you in so many and varied dangers, may still be vouchsafed to you in your honourable retirement, regarded as you ever will be by your fellow-countrymen as one of Eng land's brightest ornaments and bravest defenders." The Mayoa, is presenting tho above address to Sir Harry, said he did so with the greatest pleasure. It had been agreed to unanimously at a meeting of the inhabi tants, who desired to empress their sympathy with a brave and gallaut officer, who had been withdrawn at the moment of victory from the scene of his triumph. Sir Hanear SMITH, in returning thanks, said he did so with every feeling of a grateful heart. He had many years since embarked at Portsmouth on the first cam paign he had ever been engaged in, when he was not only unknown to the world, but to himself. For no youth r 3 aware of the latent qualities he might hereafter e l s play, and if he (Sir Harry) had, in his long eventful b ' e r e eer, done anything to deserve the encomiums that had that 041 1 Passed ca him, he could only say that he had do, e l jad what was every man's wish and endeavour to e __Elec e ple reward in the approbation of the country which g,_ . him birth.-(Cheers.) The position in ever stouderY One i n 'e ev ead been recently placed, was an arduous respect. Ile believed few men had hear.) g ut ul h a more difficult position. - (Hear, au 0 was proud in being able to say he h cr e r i eLful in rescuing the colony corn dmbaaindttgeedrbsebeylnn ha to his government from the boldly said ha had it a Was placed.-(Chcers.) This he had now left a ht as r e ' - (Ranowed cheers.) And ha commander, wh o 1,,,, iv Irmy ucder a veteran and able trluttbm,igthatat soldiee not i ;a at to turn that army to good quite right to say it, but it o wnaandera tha n wi r t l l were better satisfied with successful in • others--(Hear)-and if he had boon seceess he Jais career, itthe gallant , was to British army that °wed that Souser Vati the n e t . 1, - iit' sit bad pleased Al . 'eceeas rather than to a n y v-IL le i a ) He did r 'ghtY God to bless him d inapositiotnooefsneoinanatterthetrhocusivatshantevhaer with. ,_,(Appasus. • . . - s a a ~,, an army placed obstacles greater danger and diffi culty, w ith liiver them -n fro - us had lately for they vre ) r. Not c i f . m or m e . andeci.(Hear. Weil hat but that they suffered hunger or privation, 11 d to be out they were compelled after fter niah s i the wag but a blan -1 1 l e: bush without anY; l e weather • the inclemency 'Enna eared to' fe.--I'they rallied bravely around isino P y admitted it to contend with their that they would ultimately meet w" dAI approbation of have a ruell in their country.-(Hear.) w as somewhat painful to a veteran and satisfied and -- • e d from ia l v i l li s l ib e an army triumphant in itself an applause.) Bat airate-btcd with its general.-(Loud iec-bae'en'nharemittilvtoet p ro udhr : e recalled P heaving feel her Majestyre7P2n. high and public situations must f el they representatives to perform as advisers d if those ploc d a - as representatives of the country; en e over him (Sir Harry Smith) by her .alaJ -asty thought it th eir duty to panne towards him the c o nduct they did, h e bowed with submission.-(Cheers.) Bu t he felt pro u d ~ in being able to gay ho had left G Viet ono; army . THE LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, JUNE (Renewed applause.) He had left the colony of the Cape of Good Hope—alluding to its civil administra tion—without one particle of its public business left un done, and he had left a treasury without a debt—Hear, hear)—a people improving among themselves, and only in want of the active operation of the constitut ion he had so strenuously endeavoured to get for them. But he must admit that her Majesty's late Government were very desirous of giving to the Cape the advantagf as of a constitution. Therefore, whilst he submitted reedily to the position in which he was now placed, he cou'ld with safety state that he had done all that lay in his ptwer to lead the army to success, and to the good civil admiinistra tion of the colony committed to his charge--so as to leave matters to his Gallant Friend, his successor, in a. fair position as regarded bringing to a termination that con dition of the Cape which had been of so much mischief to itself and expense to the mother country. The ad dress presented to him breathed a hope that Provi dence would still vouchsafe its protection to him. This reminded him of the past, that when adjutant of three companies at the storming of Monte Video, he happened to be fast asleep when the regiment was ordered to fall in. He was called up by a brother officer, when his first ejaculation was, "Oh Lord, in Thee have I put my trust, let me never be confounded."—(Loud applause.) And he came out of that terrific storming unscathed; and ever since those words had been his safeguard and guide. In conclusion, he said, that as it was Ports mouth that cheered him on his departure to the Cape, he felt bound to be more explicit with them on re turning triumphant and victorious from that plane. Ho could assure thorn that any trouble in which be had been involved had been amply repaid by their kindness. PRICES OF SHARES IN BANKS, ASSURANCE, AND OTHER COM , PANIES' STOCK. From the Official List. PUBLISHED EVERT TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVENING, L9NDON, TUESDAY, JUNE 1. SOINT-SIVOCZ a& XS. MORTALITY in the METROPOLIS. NUMBER OF DEATHS FROM ALL CAUSES REGISTERED IN THE WEEK ENDING SATURDAY, MAX 29, less. Epidemic, Endemic, and Contagious Diseases —. 4 '205 Diseases of Uncertain Seat ••• ••• ••• ••• 44 Tubercular Diseases ... ... 177 Diseases of the Brain, Nerves, and Senses... ... 104 Diseases of the Heart and 8100d -vessels ... 40 Diseases of the Lungs, and other Organs of Respiration ••• ••• 4r•• .........115 Diseases of the Stomach, Liver, and other Organs of Digestion... ••• .1••• .•• ••• ••• 50 Diseases of the Kidneys, &c. •• • ••• ••• 11 Childbirth, Diseases of the Uterus, &C. ... 9 Diseases of the Joints, Bones, and Muscles ••• 10 Diseases of the Skin, &o. 0 Malformations... ... Premature Birth ... 3 ' ( 5 :1 Atrophy ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• 20 Old Age ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• 41 Sudden ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• ••• 5 violence, Privation, Cold, and Intemperance ... 15 Causes not specified ... DEATIIS FROM ALL CAUSES ... Population Deaths in cone- Enumet aled, sponding week 1051. of 1851. West Districts... 376,427 153 North Districts.. 490,396 177 Central Districts 3 93,256 157 East Districts ... 485,522 ••• 218 • South Districts.. 616,635 ... 285 ..... 2,362,236 Males ... Females ... ••• 990 883 Deaths in tile Week. 138 ... 883 ... 477 ... 406 ... 776 ... 640 in God." No doubt this was a clerical error, but so far as the Court was concerned it was a fatal error inasmuch as Mr. Giadstone was brought into the court upon the prohibition, or upon what purported to be one; and upon which the Court was called to give judgment. It was anti-Christian, it described the Bishop of London as anti-Christ, and was the epithet formerly applied to the Bishop of Rome, as appeared from Gregory's Deere • tats, where the title given to the Pope was Dominus Deus nester pater. It was an error that could not be alloveed to remain on the records of the Court. Dr. BA.YFORD would remind his Learned Friend that Mr. Gladstone had given an appearance. Dr. SPINKS had no more to say upon it if the appear ance had cured the objection; but he submitted that, for its own sake, the Court must take cognizance of it. The citation had been served in the diocese of Winchester, whereas the letters of request were from the diocese of London. The Church Discipline Act required that the Court should proceed according to its law and practice; and antecedent to that enactment it was governed by th© Statute of Citations of Henry VIII., which provided that no person should be cited out of the diocese where he dwelt without letters of request from the bishop of the diocese in which he resid e d. The Learned JUDOM inquired whether this was not the court of the province? Dr. SPINKS replied, that the archbishop was the ordi nary of the bishops, not of the subjects of the bishops. Dr. Addam3, in his reports, at page 18, had appended a note to the effect, that if the citation had de scribed the party as resident in Ireland, the error would have been fatal. Ho also objected that these pro ceedings had been, if not against the letter of the act for the correction of clerks, yet against its spirit, and, as this was a criminal proceeding, the accused ought to have the advantage of it. In the case of a preliminary in. quiry being directed by a bishop the defendant must have at least 14 days'notice of the proceedings; but here the offence was charged to have taken place on the 25th of January, and the citation was decreed two days afterwards. There had been the greatest hurry, and Mr. Gladstone had been obliged to appear without knowing the law applicable to his case. He now ad vanced to the articles themselves. The article which pleaded the general law made no mention of the build ing being unconsecrated, yet throughout the whole of the proceedings that fact had been prominently put forth. The charge was indistinct, and he could not now tell whether or not it was intended to charge the want of consecration as an aggravation of the of alleged to have been committed by Mr. Gladstone. The citation did not appear to him sufficiently to raise the question which was really at issue in the cause. The instrument of revocation said, " We revoke, as far as in us lies, and by law we may and can." Mr. Gladstone thought that by law the licento could not be revoked; the pro moter presumed that it could. The question was, whether doing duty on the £sth of January was made criminal by the service of the instrument on Mr. Glad stone, and the citation did not raise the question as to whether it was a valid instrument or not; the whole question turned upon that. The articles, in fact, charged no crime, for they did not allege that the instrument served on Mr. Gladstone was served either with the knowledge or by the directions of the bishop. Those circumstances ought to have been pleaded in order to constitute a charge of disobedience to his Lordship. The apparitor in his evidence merely steted that he received it from the registry, without stating from whom. But, supposing the service to be good, then the question recurred, was the instrument valid or not? Por se, disobedience was not a crime; it must be disobe dience to lawful authority. That was laid down in Hooker's " Ecclesiastical Polity." It was assumed that Mr. Gladstone had been acting in defiance of the bishop and somewhat obstinately, whereas it was not his inten tion to oppose lawful authority. He (Mr. Gladstone) could not satisfy himself that this was a lawful exercise of authority; hut, it the Learned Judge confirmed the instrument, although Mr. Gladstone might appeal against the decision on the point of law, yet ho would submit to the sentence of the Court, end wait until the judgment of the superior court had been obtained. It eras with him merely a question of conscientious duty; he thought that the bishop had assumed a power which ho did not possess, and he had not yielded to it. The onus rested on the promoter of , the suit to show that law ful authority had been exercised. There was a marked, difference between never having received a license and a license being revoked —between non admission and expulsion. The insertion of the words " during pleasure" would be nothing unless the bishop proved that he had the right to insert them. That prin ciple VMS laid down in Sir George Lee',e cases, and also in Oughton. Propzietary chapels were recognised in the Ce arch Discipline Act, although it was pleaded that Mr. Gladstone was without preferment, and this pro ceeding must be forbidden unless it came under the 26th section of the Act. Could the Bishop have power to dismiss from an office to which ho did not appoint? His Lordship had accepted the nomination of Mr., Smith, and the consent of the vicar, and had allowed Mr. Gladstone to accept it by granting him a Emus , . 01 the cases cited ho was only concerned with two, " Hodgson v. Dillon," and " Barnes is. Shore." The question as to revocation of the license was never raised in tho latter case. Mr. Shore, in fact, revoked the license by regis tering his chapel as a Dissenting chapel, and defended the action on the ground that he was a Dissenter. In the case of "Hodgson v. Dillon," with all deference to the Learned Judge, the sentence was founded on a fal lacy—that of calling on the accused to prove his in nocency, and not on the accuser to prove him guilty. Mr. Gladstone said, "Do not punish me without a trial;" but the Bishop said, " No, my will is the law." In Dr. Dillou'a case: there was an exercise of usurped power for good, but Hallam, in his work on the middle ages, showed to what gzievous abuses such an exercise of power was liable. The doubtful precedent in " Hodgson is. Dillon," where it was assumed that without a trial, without a charge, a bishop might debar a clergyman of his profession, was growing into positive law, and unless the Court interfered, and showed that clerks" were within the pale of the law, for protection as well as for punishment, the most serious consequences might result. By the ancient law, as laid down i n Gregory's Decretals," a bishop could not had been a I clergymen without giving him a trial. to the l said that proprietary chapels were unknown d law, for that the ministerstad a nondescript andtitle, that was the reason why they were under the arbitary po l i ter of the bishop; bat he contended that the law was so exp o _ sive in its nature that its circle enlarged by the aele applica tion of principles to particulars. Thera w ana logy between the office of preacher and lecturer s n d the minister of an unconsecrated chapalnl had a. cases the license was the same; w b a no it as an admission o f the qualification of the party, an d, as the bishop a ice Onrahinabids. tures tp, so power over the license granted to been erf ho had no power over th l a v t h g er r e an a t p e p d lie to st a i an unconsecrated chapel. compel a bishop to grant a to made for a menden:l ns refaced, but there license it bad been invariably he i were no o r or at common cases in the books, either and discussed aw, where the question had been raised as to whether the bishop could revoke a license. In the 11th art i cle of Archbishop Laud's impea chment he wa s c h arged with silencing orthodox preachers, to which he rep l ied that he cans© proved i n had not done it except upon just that he did court, and according to law—a proof not Claim the Mon gave 447 forms of proceeding, but right. single •revoking a license. That, for nse. ...hat, was not a single term argument. Ayliffe gave long chapter strong negative a chapter on s uepension, but he never Spoke o f the power as being exercised arbitrarily and without process. The 's case et , on in Mr. Gladstone as, in fact, suspen susponsi b neficio. The promot sion ab officio of e or must prove h . b . el ©remoter that be had power to pro it ac er yman from doing h le of the diocese, as was at.. duty case, and, unless he did, th e instrument was bad , tempted in thi s for it could not be good in p ar t and bad in part. ( Rex is, Pa ge ," 5 E ast, 3430 given by the Th e e vidence apparitor afforded a str ong that the power now claimed b y t h e argument Bishop policy. $® stated was against public that he attempted to serve the instrument on Sunday morning just before t h e service, whereas the Legislature had passed a law to prevent the arrest of a clergyman on his way to do duty. There had been no witness examined to prove that there was any report or fame against Mr. Glad stone; yet it was expressly laid down in " Gregory's Decretals" that a bishop could not proceed without it. The service of the instrument was proved by one witness only instead of two. It was pleaded that the service took place on the 19th of January, whereas the witness proved that it was on the 18th. It was served by an ap paritor of London in the diocese of Winchester. It might be said that that was done by the authority of Mr. Gladstone; but according to the decision in "Ho mer and Jones v. Bloomer," 9 Jurist, if a commission issued, the inquiry m u st b e l i mited to what took place in the particular diocese. The service, therefore, was bad. He trusted he had brought forward sufficient to ' raise a doubt with regard to the law and also the facts , of the case; and if there was a doubt in the mind of the Court, accordi ng t o a ll t h e principles of criminal proceed ing,i t must be given in favour of the party for whom he appeared. Dr. BAYIGED, in reply, said that he hoped the Court would scrutinize the evidence for the prosecution in every way, but he could not admit that Mr. Gladstone had acted in ignorance of the law. He was not inops concilii when these proceedings commenced, because a proctor appeared for him in the first instance, and, if any objec tions could then have been taken, they would have been insisted upon. The license had not been brought in, therefore it must. be assumed that it was in the usual form. It was inherent in the grant of a license that the same authority which granted it had the power of__ revo cation. The way to have treated the case would have been to move for a prohibition; if the bishop was acting without authority the temporal courts would have said that there - was no crime for which to proceed. Theo:mils sion of the word " in" occurred in the recital of the let. tors of request, and it would be going a long way to say that that rendered the proceedings null and void. Mr. Gladstone, however, had appeared to the citation. The same remark applied to the Rev. Gentleman being cited out of the diocese; bat he contended that he had been duly cited according to the requirements of the Church Discipline Act. This was a court of appeal, and its ju risdiction extended throughout the province, It was i m possible to contend successfully that M r . Gladstone held preferment in the diocese of n Londo T • had given notice to Mr. Glatisto _ . he Bishop ne or the revocation of his Loewe' and he immediately, entered denying the right of the Bishop to do it, and th en , on a formal prote s t, the following S un d ay, conducted p the service as usual. What necessity was there whether he p er f ormed the se for a commission to inqui re rvice on that day ? Mush had been said as to the building being unconsecrated, but it made no difference wheth er it was consecrate d or not. H e di d not depend upon that, but upon the power to revoke the _license. It had bee n sai d t h at t h ere was n 0 proof that the instrument had been served with the knowledge and under the directions of the Bishop; but for whet purpose did his Lordship put his hand to it and affix his seal, if ho did not intend it to be delivered? In " Barnes v. Shore" the proceedings took place on the assumption that Dir. Shore was still a clerglinani the 3, 1852, ease, therefore, was not open to the distinction which had been drawn. In " Hodgson v. Dillon" it was said that the judgment was based on a fallacy, but before he could assent to that statement he must hear stronger grounds than had been urged by his Learned Friend. That decision merely carried out the principle which had been adopted in other cases. In an unen dewed lectureship there was no reason why the bishop should not withdraw the license if ho deemed it neces sary. Archbishop Laud said he never punished without good cause, and Mr. Gladstone would not ; be punished unless there was ground shown for ft. The tact that Oughton gave no form for revoking a license only proved that no form was required. In "Freeland r. Neale," a private letter from the bishop was held to be sufficient. The Duke of Portland, as lay rector, cited a clergyman to bring in a license granted by the bishop, The statements made as to the effect which would be produced on Mr. Gladstone by revoking the license were based on the supposition that he intended to persist in such a line of conduct that he would never be able to obtain his license again. The sentence, after prohibiting him from doing duty in the diocese of London, would go on to say, " Without li cense first, had and obtained." Mr. Gladstone would only have to put himself in a proper position, and again procure the license of his diocesan. It had been said that a clergyman could not be arrested when going to church, but ho (Dr. Baylord) believed that if the officer had been content with the Sunday service it would have sufficed. It was directed in the Prayer-book that citations should ha read at a particular part of the service. Sunday was selected because the parishioners were supposed to be all at church. As to the celerity of the proceedings, Mr. Gladstone had been allowed a week between the service of the notice and the period at which it was to come into operation. There was only one witness as to the service, but it had never been held that it was necessary to do more than prove the principal matter by two witnesses. The service was a point of minor consideration. It was no hardship to Mr. Gladstone whether he was served with the notice at Brixton or elsewhere. It was the Persona' act of the Bishop, and if the service had taken place at Paris it would have been perfectly valid. He trusted that the Court would consider the articles proved; that it would admonish Mr. Gladstone to ab stain from officiating in the diocese of London, and, as he before said, condemn him in the costs of the pro ceediege. The Learned JUDGE raid that he would deliver his judgment on the next court-day, June 12. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS, June 2. (Before Mr. Sergeant ADAMS, Assistant Judge, and a Bench of Magistrates, at the Guildhall, Westminster.) The Court today heard the bailed cases. Daykin, William Blackmore, and Charles Dobson were charged with assaulting three constables o f the metropolitan police force in the execution of their duty, Mr. Cooper and Mr. Poland appeared for the prosecu tion, instructed from the office of the Solicitor of the Treasury; and Mr. O'Brien for the defence of Daykin. The other prisoners were undefended. It appeared that Dobson was fighting with another man on St. Herman's-hill, Westminster, with a crowd of people collected round, on the night of the 19th of May, and the policeman went up to put a stop to it. Shipp, one of the policemen, went up and took Dobson in custody, when Daykin attempted to rescue him with some of the mob, and got Shipp down and kicked him about the heed and body, saying that he would tety him out. Some of the people also throw brickbats and tiles at them from the tops of the houses. During the affray Daykin assaulted the other policemen, and Blackmore struck one of them with a bludgeon on the head. He became insensible from tho blow, and Shipp was so in jured that ho was taken to a surgeon, and was bleeding all about his head. Dobson, it seemed, only attempted to get away and threw down the policeman who was holding him, and th en D ay ki n came up and kicked and struck him. Mr. O'Bunie said that he should call a witness to prove that one of the policemen struck Daykin on the head before ho interfered at all, and that this unprovoked assault on him made him commit the offence) he was charged with. He then called Marianne Florent, who stated that, seeing a crowd, she went up to see the row. Dobson was fighting, and was taken into custody. Daykin was standing by, and only asked the policemen to let the man go quietly and ho struck him over the head with hie staff. Day kin asked hire what he did that for, anclhit him again, and she then wont away. The ASSISTANT-JUDGE having briefly summed up, The jury returned a verdict of Miiman, a police-constable, • was then called, and stated that Daykin had been summarily convicted be fore for an assault on the police, and had also had two months' imprisonment for breaking a plate glass shop window in Oxford -street. In 1849 he had twelve months' imprisenment for " ringing changes" at Wool wich (this., he explained, was gcetiug change at a shop, subsituting a bad shilling for a good one among the change, end insisting on the shopman giving another in its stead), and six months pr ev i ous l y f or a felony. The woman who was called as a witness he knew as a bad character. The ASSISTANT-JUDGE said that Daykin was evi dently the ringleader in this assault, and had aggravated his offence by bringing a woman to tell a story that no body could believe. On him, therefore, the Court would pass the heaviest sentence, without any reference to the character he had just received. He then sentenced Daykin to eight months', Blockmore to four mont h s ', and Dobson to two months' imprisonment with hard labour. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. WESTIIHNSTE It. The public sympathy, at all times alive to cases of distrees, has been considerably excited with regard to an application made at this court a few days ago by a person of ladylike appearance, who represented that she and her two children, by a former marriage with a merchant, bad been totally neglected and deserted by her present husband, late an officer in the Dragoon Guards, and a member of the Army and Navy Club. Her tale was of the most pitiable and heartrending cha racter, and went to show that after a tour on the conti nent with her husband, he had left, her at Liverpool to go to a furnished house he had taken for her at Brompton, while he paid a month's visit to his pa rents in the Isle of Man, but that she never saw him afterwards, and, having maintained herself and chil dren by disposing of her plate and jewels, she fell step by step into the most abject state of poverty, and, after wandering the streets hungry and houseless, was indebted for a meal's victuals for herself and children and the temporary shelter of a roof to a poor la bouring man named Gibbons and his wife, who had known her in her prosperity. Although she had re ceived affectionate letters from her husband, mho was a gentleman of property, he had in no way contributed since ho loft her at Liverpool to her support, and her last communications apprising him of her wretched con dition had been unanswered. She referred the magis trate to the solicitor of her husband's family, who trans mitted the income of his estate, and declared her con duct as a wife to have been must exemplary. There was a speciousness of manner coupled with her appearance, which, added to the favourable report resulting from the inquiry of the moment, was strongly calculated to im press the hearers with the truth of her statements, and Mr. Arnold, having afforded her some temporary relief, suggested to her the expediency of again visiting the so licitor in quo itiOD, with a view of obtaining the support to which she was entitled from her husband. The re port of her interview with the magistrate was detailed in the papers of Thursday last, till on the following day, in cute,equeece of certain communications the public were cautioned against contributing anything to the relief of the applicant until further inquiries had been made!, Mr. Bishop, of Bond-street, gave such private informa tion as afforded the worthy Magistrate an oppor tunity of judging for himself by the most conclusive tes timony of the character of the applicant. Mr. Bishop's account having been confirmed in the most minute par ticulars, Mr. Arnold sent for the applicant, and it having been stated that she was a kept mistress up to the time she was united to her present husband, the worthy magistrate interrogated her on this point, when she de clared that her former statement that she was the widow of a timber-merchant named Eveleigh was true, and that she had been married at Christchurch in the City; but she had no certificate, and her treacherous memory pre vented her being able to state the date of the marriage, though she could procure the certificate, and would take as early opportunity of doing so. Mr. ARNOLD, having inquired what the applicant meant by stating in a letter she had written that there were two or three little things she wished to explain? Applicant replied it had reference to th e c i rcumstance that the labourer's wife who had given h er s h elter was a fetchingt h et he r spirits for h er f rom a (appli cant ' s) children d m r i i g n h k t in h g av w e woman, and n e d n fr pu d blic- she: house in d she herself, unwilli ng to lose the only ien had i her misery, and thus lose the shelter of her humble roof, had on twooer three o ccas i ons herself procured cordials for her. Although a drinking woman, her hostess had been very kind to her, and had afforded her children shelter. Mr. ARNOLD intimated that he had heard applicant was in the habit of drinking, and received the visits of common soldiers. Applicant burst into tears, and declared it was a most nny In fa us scandal. She had make an application to the adjutant of the Life Guards on behalf of a poor laun dress she was desirous of serving, and she supposed the calumny owed its origin to an orderly bringing two notes to her upon the subject. Page, a police-constable of the B division, was called in and asked whether he knew the applicant. The officer replied ho did. Mr. ARNOLD inquired what he knew of her. occasions drunk; r e pli e d t h at h o ha d seen her on severa l 0 f tl3O drunk; on one occas i on so d run k t h at she fell bad seen out door of the Globe p u blic•house, at Chelsea. her with Lif e G uar d smen , an d about 10 or he saw her g o i nto a b r othel with a man in Hooper's i we eks ago court, Keightsbriige. l -a be had frequently and said Wright, 39 B, was called, seen her drunk. Mr. ARNOLD said the inquiry ; was a very painful one, wished to mike any reply to i t. Applicant, who had and asked whether she so bbed considerably during these s not a particle of env h in th em. She said there " the streots four or five - e ve w e.. She had been wander in g d imputed impr ener had before stated, and they ho • as sire m otives to her in conseq uence. She neither k new the Globe, nor uooree e e -court, and f e l t quite shock d at said. what had been .d th e applicant ino• • Q) stout l y dt -.lntim her innocence, 1.- ; d ec lare that she could disprore the allegations, that an< Mr. ARNOLD said he should be extremely sorry to " m e to a hasty conclusion, and, a; applicant leadheeen taken by surprise, he Would adjourn the ease for fui.her inquiry. Applicant expressed a hope that she should not be P reiLicliced caI oIDY Or adataken identity, and en- BIRTHS IN THE WEEK. Dividend Amount Name of trimly. per of Paid. Prico, Annum. Share. 4 e. d. I. d. Australasia .......... 51. per cent. 40 0 0 40 0 BritshNorth American W. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 Oommercial of London 61. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 Colonial.. Gloucestershire • • lonian 6/. pr cent. 25 0 0 25 0 0 Landon and County .. 61. per cent. 50 0 0 20 0 0 Lowin and Westminstr 61. per oont. 100 0 0 20 0 0 London Joint-Stock .. • 61. per cent. AO 0 0 10 0 0 18N Provincialof Ireland.. 81. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 45% Ditto, New. •• • • • • 8/. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 National of Ireland .. 41. per cent. 50 0 0 22 10 0 20 Nat. Provncial of Eng. 61. per cent. IDO 0 0 35 0 0 Ditto, New. • •• • • Q. par cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0 Oriental Bank Corpora. 81. p. ct.& bs. 25 0 0 25 0 0 4631, donth Australia ••• • .. 6/. p. ct.& bs. 25 0 0 25 0 0 Union of Australia .• 61. per cent. 25 0 0 25 0 0 42% Ditto • • 61. per cent. 210 0 Union of London. •• .• 71. par cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 Union of. Madrid .•... 40 0 0 40 0 0 _ INSITUANON COMIEPANZZa. Dividend Amount Name of COmpaay. per of - Paid. Price Annum. Share. -- -.............--. A a. d. £ a. d. albion .. ............ 81 . 108 . 5,00 0 0 50 0 0 86 Alliance Brit. and For. 71.145.6d.b5. 100 0 0 11 0 0 22 Ditto Marine. ••• • • • 61. p.c.& be. 100 0 0 25 0 0 41A Atlas ..... •........ •• 135.6 d. DO 0 0 510 0 18N, Arhus Life ....... .. 41. per cent. 100 0 0 16 0 0 - British Commercial .• 7e. 6d. 50 0 0 5 0 0 6 . 1 i Claricl,Med.&Ges•Life spr ct.& bs. 100 0 0 10 0 0 10ii 41. 100 0 0 10 0 0 101 148. 80 0 0 5 0 0 16 1 4 Eagle ....... ..... •• • • 55. 50 0 0 - 5 0 0 7u Egity and Law .... •• 4 34 per ceat. 100 0 0 50 0 5!.i ~ l oropeas Life ••• • • 10s. 20 0 0 All paid. 12 General •••••• • • • • • • - 5 0 0 if 5% Gl-be Guardian •-.•• • • • • • 51. per cent 100 0 0 45 0 0 56 Imperial Fire -•••• •• 121. per cent. 500 0 0 50 0 0 256 Irnperial Life •••• • • • • 125. 100 0 0 10 0 0 19% In _len - nifty Marine •• •• 11. sh. & as. 100 0 0 20 0 0 50 Law Fire ... .... .... 25.& 2s. bs. 100 0 0 210 0 4 Law Life.... --- .. - 100 0 0 10 0 0 46% be,s - al and General Life - 50 0 0 20 0 5% London Fire ........ 105. & be. 25 0 0 12 10 0 25 London Ship . •• •• 105. & b 3. 25 0 0 12 10 0 - t!farine.. ............ Iss.per share 100 0 0 15 0 0 15U lied.lnvild &Gen. Life 4341. per ct. 50 0 0 20 0 2% Monarch ••.•-.. - •• - 5 0 0 1 0 0 19s. Cd 'Tattonal Lean Fund- 51. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 2 34 Plliadium Life 5l. per cent. 50 0 0 90 0 234 P . ..aix • - - 160 Profeiselonal Life.. •• - 51. per cent. 6 5 0 010 0 155.0 d Provident Life .... -• • 11. 55. & ba. 100 0 0 10 0 0 36 Rock Li fe........ .... 50. a 0 0 010 0 7% Royal Exchange 6l. p.ct. & be. Stack. all 2253 4t171 Fire.. - „ 213 Ditto Vfe ••• - United Kingdom f TRiversal Life-. .. Victoria Life - 412 6 5% 38047Z.110. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. ............................... ...i...... ~........,, .1•••1.1..1••14 ••••••MMM., 8. X Commercial - 90% East and West Ind , a ,, 6341. pr cent. Stock. - - East Country -.. •• - - London ... •• • 5l. pr cent. Stock. - 12834 Ditto Bonds 4l. par cent. - - - St. Katharine - Ditto Bonds 43(1. pr cent. - - - Santhanapton .....• i 11. per cent. i5O 0 0 50 0 0 27 117 it Xl3 OBS Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. ...... •••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••ry......... ......,, X. a. d. .C. a. d. Efangerford...• • • .. • • - - - - Southwrk •..... •• .. - 100 0 0 -- - Ditto Nw of 4 2 p.c. 700. per cent. 50 0 0 - DE Waterloo ............ - 100 0 0 -3% Mtn Old Ann. ofBl. 21.85 . Od. •-• 60 0 0 24% Ditto liw ditto 0f.71. 21. 25. Od. -, 40 0 0 22 7auxhall •• .. •• • Av. 21. 70 10 3 - - vrammst-worms. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. ..........1•VINNIMI ••••••••• .................... X 8. d. A a. d. East London..•• •• •• -81. per cnt. 100 0 0 - 155 Grand Junction ...... 4/.'per wit. 50 0 0 - 6534 Zeta...-. .. ........ 41. per cut. 100 0 0 - 83 Lambeth - 97 .... Now River Company 21.103. - 60 Southwark & Vauxhall 51. per cnt. 100 0 0 - W..at Middlesex ••• • - 161. Os. pr ant. - - - Males Females ... ... ••• Total ..,1,416 *ln this number are included 41 by Scarlatina, 3 by Typhus Fever, 13 by Diarrhoea, and 2 by Cholera. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, June 2. (Sittings in Middlesex, at Nisi Prins, in Trinity Term, before Mr. Baron PARKE and Common Juries.) PARKE S V. MAYER. Mr. Sergeant Wilkins and Mr. H. A. Simon con ducted the case for the plaintiff, and Mr. Edwin James, with Mr. Bevil), represented the defendant. This was an action to recover compensation in damages for an alleged fake imprisonment and assault. It appeared that the plaintiff was formerly a partner in • row, but had som e ti me sines failed for a sum of 45,0001. rti the firm of Parkes, S m i th, and Co., solicitors, Bedford ! On the Ist of July, 18M, being pressed for money, ha made an application to a person of the name of Barnard, , 34 a clerk in the Royal British Bank, to whom he was known, to discount for him. This application, how ever, was refused, beiug contrary to the rules of the • bank. Barnard wishing to assist the plaintiff gave hint a card of introduction to the defendant, a plate glass manufacturer in Great Queen-street, Lin coin's Inn-fi e ld s, at the moment supposing that the former had a good account at the bank, although it afterwards tea turned out th at that account was overdrawn by about 121. The d e f en d ant was in the habit of discounting bills. The plaintiff, when at the defendant's, pr o d uce d three accept ances by different persons, one for 1201., one for 401, and one for 301. At first the defendant refused i t to comply wi t h the reqaest to discount, but subsequently, upon the pl a i ntif f depositing with him fifty share, in a lime quarry i n Cornwa:l, the deltridant made an advance of 501, vehicle such was either to be repaid in three days, ;m or the discount was to be completed with a deduction of 101. The plaintiff, however, having obtained the 501., did not again visit the defendant, as bad been agreed % upon. Upon this a corresponds:nee was opened between the parties, the defendant demanding the repayment of 6 the 501., as he had discovered that the bills were unsafe. 9% And so it proved, for on their arrived at maturity they , 0 were dishonoured. The money for the 401. bill was af -4 was walkin g a l ong , terwarda re covered. It happened that as the defendant Cheanside on the 4th of October he met th o plaintiff, whereupon he gave him into • custody up on a charge of having obtained money from him under false pretences. This was on the Saturday; Cd and on the Monday, having been brought up before !tte 234 magistrate, the ease was dismissed, upon the ground that 2 :4 the false p retences had not been established. The pre• I.od sen t action was therefor e bro tion for thi s imprisonment, dght to recover compensa is •1,0001. and the damages were laid at The plaintiff, having been called, proved the original transaction, and added that ho banked at the Royal British Bank, and that he had applied to Mr. Barnard, the chief cashier, who eventually gave him a card of intro duction to the defendant. Cross-examined by Mr. JAMES—At the time of his application his account was overdrawn 121., which ba lance against him had not, up to the present moment, been diminished. He had not told the defendant that the clerk at the bank would endorse the bills. Of that fact he was quite certain, and would swear it. He had t 34 deposited some shares with the defendant as a sort of security. Those shares he bad purchased of a :34 Mr. Pace, but he had not paid for them. He gave a bill for them, which had not been paid. The bills he had deposited with the defendant were bills which had been accepted for his own accommoda tion, and they had not been honoured. He took the benefit of the Insolvent Act in 1849, when his liabilities were as much as 45,0001. In the course of his ere- Paid. I Price. fessional transactions large sums had come into his pos session, but had not afte rwar d s been forthcoming when required by the parties. Hence the large amount of his liabilities. Further evidence was given to prove the custody and It 6 the Lord Mayor. jury for the defendant in e i d he re p p l u ai t n a t t i i ff oa, and by practising frauds t v h e e r M y dr a i : j lt ia iP sEl e s e o c at h dtd : lr e ee tl s l ae m sde ee bt t yh i e ng in terms of great severity tea a respectable practice as an attorney, had subsequently who, having once been in on the unwary. He would leave the matter in the hands existedo t he conduct h d iuscrtuoi ruined of the jury, by whom he felt assured due justice would be done. after a little co nsultation, returned a verdict Mr. Baron PARKE then summed up the evidence. e t 4 laintiff—Damages. One Farthi ng . I 97 A 3 for T t h he e pjury, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, June 2. (Sittings in Ban co. - --Trinity Term.) GREGORY v. THE DUZE OF BRUNSWICK. In this case a rule has been obtained, calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the record should not ba amended, by inserting in it the judgment of the Court f pay the costs incurred subsequ en t t o t h e j u d gment. it a ppeared, h ad been carried to the Court of Exchequer gave judgm ent far the plaintiff on the de murrer,W o T E h x e c c he afi q e n ,er Chamber, Chamber, andan d thaty the plaintiff should not h Court, in the absence of h the demurrer, and for the do ii fendant on the issues. One of the defendant's counsel present, by mistake , endorsed on hi s b r i ef " J udgment for the defendant, with all the costs," and on the brief being handed in to the Master, this endorsement was e with the costs of entered on the record, whereupon the plaintiff's atter afnactookither inquiry, immediately ' issued a the case to the Rouse of Lords, judgment. g i ven b elow was affirmed. The Master having been r equested to inquire and re port when the respective attorneys first knew of the where awerYi o fwt error, mistake, now reported that n e ith er o f t h e attorneys knew of theovrit of error until a few d a y s b e f ore i t was argued, but that the defendant's atto rney fi rst k new of it. On this report, Mr. M AN/STY, f or the plaintiff, in showily, cause against the rule, contended that the de fendant ought to Day the unnecessary costs which bad ice. been incurred, 'the mistake also having originated with him. Mr. ATHERTON, Q. 0., havin— g been heard in support A of the rule, 16 The COURT made the rule absolute, and ordered the defendant to pay all the Costa, including the ooata of the application.- 1300 absolute. t 7 vaNii.x.s. u; . ''Dividend Names of ~.. Dividend [ P r ice. Names of . \ per Conaltanies. 1g per Companies. A Annum Price, R Anntini. an ...„,.................. -....- .-.—.......... ....6......- ~.......,- ......... A X Ashtnl Oldh 98 71. p. ct. 140 Macclesfield. 100 21.105. 50 narnsleY. •• • 160' Neatb •• • • 100 161. Rrkuk&Abrg 1501 51. 85 Oxford.. •• •• 100 13/. 135 Birmingham 40 41. 101 'Peak Forest. 78 31. 183. 70 Coventry...• 1001 251. 200 Regent's •• •• 33 11. 3s. 16% Derby ... • • 100 61. 63 Rochdale.... R 5 21. 42 EllsmratChs 69 , 2% p. ct. 33% Semrset Coal 1 50 GrandJunctn 100 3/.pr.ct. 4814 Do.LkFd St 12 Do., 6 pr. Ct. 10'61. pr. ct. 1134 Stffriil &Wore 1 40 281. 405 Grand Surrey 100. 21. 08. 33 Shrewsbury— 1 45 _, wyeita Grand Union 100 11. 10 s . 24 Stourbridigi.i 26 21 . 03 . 24e.. 145 201 • 290 Lancaster . 1001 Kennt tm Avn 39 48, Od. 5% Severn andl Leeds&Livrp 100 201. 455 Warwick& Leicester ...• 100 Si. 66 Birming. J 100 41. 40 Leicstr&lTth 83 1 41. 44% Warwick/15i ,; .., rioughboregh 142! 701 s_lo N m a r p in to in n g ...3 l 1 : 8 0 " 3 1 3 2 3 8 Monmonthsh 1001 Worestr Iml lintzemrysk 100, I IfeltnMwbry 100 Wilts & Brits lls. 6d. 7u 111. 6d.1 OAS-LIGET AND COZE COMPAN7ES. Dividend 1 Amount Name of Company. Br D it i i t s t h o . i. per of Paid. Price, Annum. Share. , ___..• ~ ,----- ........... 11. Bs. 20 0 0 20 0 0 18% 'X. a. d. Z. s. d. Provincial.... ..• ••• •• 11. ) 40 0 0 18 0 0 !0 4( Brighton ••••-•• - •• 51. 20 0 0 - 16 G City of London ...... 61. 100 0 0 150 6 0 125 ' , Continental Consolidat. 50 5 . 75 0 0 31 5 0 45% Equitable -. .... .. .... no s . 50 0 0 50 0 0 27 1 Great Central'.. •... . 51. 0 0 0 10 0 0 131 A I Imperial .• .... •• •• •• 31. & bonus. 5 0 0 0 50 0 0 70 - Independent ......... 61. 40 0 0 40 0 0 46 London.• ............ - 50 0 0 50 0 0 -- Do., Parl. Preference 61. 25 0 0 710 0 25 Phonic ....... •..... 31/. per Cent. 50 0 0 49 A 0 26% Ratcliff •• •• • ........ 51. 100 0 0 90 0 0 - United General ...... 1/. 50 0 0 50 0 0 20 % WeStztinster Chartered 51. per cent, 50 0 0 - 39 Ditto, New 747Z3T or SCOT'X'XICEIt COISTP.A.NzEiS' PEXCES Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. - ...NM a• O. ...., ...... ....... ....... ....... ..... .....• .. ........ ............. X s. d Bank of Scotland British Linen Company 81. per cent. 100 0 0 100 0 0 206 Caledonian Bank City ofGlasgow Bank il. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 10 % Clydesdale Bank-- •• 64 per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0 12115 s Commercial Bank •• •• 7/. per cent. 500 0 0 100 0 0 150 34 Eastern Bank.. -•• •• 61. per cent. 25 0 0 10 0 0 10 Edinb.&olasgow Bank 31. per cent. 5 0 0 s 0 0 8% Faehangeßnk of Scot - 100 0 0 38 0 0 5 l'ational Bank 634 percent. 60 0 0 10 0 0 1544 Forthof Scotlandßank 51. percent. 20 00 , 210 0 2; itoyalßank of Scotland 5/. per cent. 100 0 0 1 100 0 0 13334 Union Bank of Scotland 81. per cont. 100 0 50 0 0 9 2 Western Bank.. -•• • • 71. per cent. 50 0 50 0 0 6936 Alliance Fire and Life 84 /.pr cent. 10 0 10 0 0 21Ni British Guarantee Caledonian Fire Insur lO/.per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 25 1 ,4 City of Glasgow Life 6l. per cent. 25 0 0 2 0 0 41. 6s Colonial Life ...• .• • • 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 1 0 0 2% Edinburgh Life Insur. 61. per cent. 100 0 0 15 0 0 22 Eng.& Scot, Law Life 51. percent. 50 0 0 217 6 3% Life Assoc. of Scotland 6 /.per cent. 10 0 0 110 0 31.158 National Fire and Life 5/. per cent. 10 0 0 1 0 0 285.0 d North British Insur. - 61. per cent. 200 0 0 20 0 0 3434 Scottish Unionlnsrnce. 741. pr cont. 20 0 0 1 0 0 310.6 d Standard Life ........ 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 7 0 0 1234 United Dep.Assarance 51. per cent. 10 0 0 1 o 0 203 od 21IIESCEL3 ANZOI7O. Dividend Amount Yam) of Company. per of Paid. Price. Annum. Share. ....... X . s. d. X. s. d. Assam Tea .... • • .... - 50 0 0 20 0 0 10 kactimn Mart.. -•. .. 21. ss. 50 0 0 - 26 Cistralian A?Ticalturl 11. 100 0 0 35 0 0 16% Australian Trust .• .. 6/. per cent. - 35 0 0 21fs ingio-Mexican Mint.. 11. 10s. 10 0 0 10 0 0 23 Ditto, Half Shares.. - - 210 0 - British American Land 15s. - 38 10 0 25 , Canada ......... •• .. 6/. per cent. 100 0 0 32 10 0 56 I Do. 5 per cent Bonds - - - .- = Ditto, 6 pr ct. Bonds Si . per'cert• - - 11434 City Navigation Bonds 31 per cent. - - 57 I Gan. Revers. &Invest. ,5 p.c.&;ba, 0/ 100 0 0 ,100 0 0 94% 1 Equitable Roversienry 151 pr, cent. 1100 0 0 100 0 0 117 Ditto Wew . - ... - 50 0 0 710 0 - I Gen.SteamNavigation 10 p.ct. 15 0 0 14 0 0 2834 Hudson's Bay ........, 206 f. - Stock. - Hungerford ..., ..... 21. . 55. - 100 0 0 47 1 London Institution ... - - 78 15 0 5 I New Zealand Company - 25 0 0, 25 0 0 - Ditto. New ........ - 25 00112 10 0 - r It/sseli Institution.. .• - - 1 26 5 0 - a eaninslr&Orient.Stm. 81. p. c.&bs., 50 0 0 r 50 0 0 r /loyal M a il S tea m-. 41 . p. ahcaeruet..' lieversionery Int. Soc. -1143. pr 1 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 106 Ikoth Australian .•• • • " 5 Lper share 25 125 0 0 24% 1 0 T Dialnall'a Land.. I - • 0 0 190 0i 29 0 0 :- 0 ARCHEs , COURT June 2. THE BISHOP OF LON DON v. THE REV. J. E. , GL ADSTONE. ( B efore Sir J. Donsose) This case having been called on at ten o'clock this 1% morning, Dr. Bayford appeared f or the Bishop o f L on don, and Dr. ,Spinks for the Rev. J. E. Gladstone. F Dr. BAYoRD, havin g detailed the proceedings in the case on former oecasio see that the greater number d the articles of citation had tee. been admitted by M r. Gladstone and that his substantial as objections were against the 4th and sth articles. The x s. d principal objections of Mr. G l a dstone were that the pro too 0 0 ts', niaition of the B, hproperly ns, observed that the Court would d too 0 0 206 The .a op had not been duly and of Mr. Gladstone, and 210 0 31.155. served. prohibition had been served by an officer to 0 o 10% the court upon to 0 l2/15s with that gentle The officer, George 100 0 0 isot4 man s request. The wont on the last, being a Satur to 0 0 10 day, 17th of January so 0 sli to Lon the Chapel, and made an attempt to serve 38 0 0 5 the prohibition. li ' se Mr. Gladstone, nor 10 0 0 1544 could he learn . e could not S. resided. On the in due accordance 210 0 27i. Where that gentleman next morning, being Sunday, the officer called again at the Long-acre Chapel, where, at eleven o'clock, ho saw ao 0 0 6914 Mr. Gladstone, and the prohibition it was to o o 21 Ni objected to be upon offering Irr Gladstone, 15000 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 3% 0 172 6d , received on that dfly• --A. • 10 0 0 25m nowever, asked 41. ss on the following d ay ta the officer to conic to his residence 2 0 0 at Brixton, where ho would m -10 0 2% ceivo the prohibition. This done, and it was therefore s o 0 22 idlewas now on 6 3% the part of Mr. Gladstone to object to the 1 1 1 ; 7 3 6 31. 155 due service of the prohibition. After some further ob oe 0 0 sss.od servations, the Learned Doctor concluded by calling to o o 306 1 0 Co 315.6 d upon the Court to confirm the prohibition, and prevent 7 0 0 123 4 Mr. Gladstone officiating in defiance of his Bishop. 1o 0 1 203 o,' Dr. SP uircs said he appeared for Mr. Gladstone, and, after some p re li minary observations, remarked that his client had, in ignorance of the ecelesiestical law, pro ceeded erroneously before the Court on termer occa bad b 2 en adverse sions, and consequently upon such proceeding jud gment to him, because it is The Junoa —Do you me an to contest my j u d gment— Dr. Snrs irregu ar? the law on th e ues intended to r a i s e the wh o l e quest i on o f case. The Junoa—lf you intend to raise a n y o bj ec ti on to m y judgment I h ave nothing to say aga i nst i t , more th to inform you that it is not regular. Of course Mr. Gladstone has an appeal against the judgment (.") this Court, and to argue against that ju:l, , nont at this - a moment i 9 most informal. Dr. SPINKS would net at that moment go into the mat ter, though there were cases of precedent for his dc ' in a g so. So far as the Thshop called his license a license t the plealtlre, he (Dr. Spinks) denied. The liecr?sc to ° wa3 Bishop allos s i n e a Mr. Gladstone to ciffi with not a license ta% Pleasure, and to be revoked t out good cause aE , Biened, but was to all inten,s .. an d purposes a license i, full and without Pra.:t. There was also a most important objection to the validity of the prohibition, w hich w as wor ded as the prohibiti on of the ".Eight Itor. father God," instead of ",Father treated an scljonrnment, as she courted the fullest irquiry. It hiwing bsea arrang?d that the whole matter should be kept in abeyance until yesterday, at a little before the closing of the court applient again appeared, as did also Mr. Bisbop, with a string of witnessea. Mr. ARNOLD, advtxting to two letters he had received from applicant, the one soliciting him very politely to pay a cabman who had driven her about all day 00 Sa turday, and the other int4nuting that she left any money received at tho office on her account to ba disposed of as he thought fit, observed that the question simply was whether she was a deserving person, and asked whether she wished to have this inquiry carried any further? Applicint said she would rather not for the sake of her family. Mr. ARNOLD thought that was the very reason that , with her assertions of innocence and propriety, ho should, and wEnt on with the case. Mr. Bishop obaervEd that the distress of the poor children was true, and they had been starving about the streets. In compaczion for them, and knowing that her husband had left her, ho had given them as much as 10/, but, finding she was a most worthless person, be had considered it his duty to come forward and protect the benevolent by showing her trim character. Mrs. Large, with whom she had lodged, pro►ed that a soldier and a young man visit ~ d applicant (who °co bionfdly get drunk) for improper purposes. Applicant told her she had been living wi'h a gentleman at Putney. She went away with the man Gibbons, spoken of; for fortnight. Eliza Layers said, applicant lived in her house about Christmas last. She represented herself as a private soldier's wife, and a private soldier of the Life Uttar& cohabited with her as her husband. She distributed ber favours among several other men. Other persons were in attendence, poor people, whom she had defrauded, and another of whom spoke of her liaisons. Applicant at first endeavoured to prejudice the wit nesses against her by declaring they were not respect able themselves, but at last hung down her head, and appeared to feel that it v; is useless to attempt to carry the imposture any further. She neithsr produced the certificate of her alleged first marriage, nor offered the denial she had promised of the charges against her, and it will quite clear that she had speculated with a friend, to Mrs. Robins (a governess, who has been a recipient of mue't bnenty from the public herself, and who very improperly endeavoured by letters to the magistrates 1 0 prop up her assumed respectability), upon receiving 0 large sum in the way of donations from the benevolernt• Mr. ARNOLD, after thanking Mr. Bishop, in the nate° of the public for the great service he had rendered it, regretted very much that he could only come to one conclusion, and that we., that the applicant had bee s leeding a most absudoned and profligate life, and altogether a person most undeserving of public sycel ) ° - thy. He had received some sums from benevolent per.. sons, not one farthing of which he could for a moment think of giving her; but it was a matter of consideration with him, although the amount at that moment yin° inadtquate for anything like the purpose, whether they might not be applied to rescue the two poor children from the contamination of their mother. Where they had given mules and addresses he would write to the donors, and he should feel indebted by the press ex-, pressing his view s , an d ac k now l e d g i ng t h e rece ipt et other donations by initials, &c. Hs had no power to take the children from her, but if she consented WI night by some means be provided for; and, if to be rescued from infamy and vies, he had no doubt sufficient means would be added to what be had already received on their behalf. The woman solicited the evening to determine wile' ther her children should Fie niened from pollution. THE COUNT ICY MARKETS. NEWCASTLE CORN MARKET, JUNE I.—lt being holida y time, there was a very thin attendance at our market to-Mr. Everything held firm, and no change in prices. NEWCASTLE CATTLE M ARKET , J UNE I.—Supp l y d beasts, 82U; cows, 825 ; quality good ; trade brisk at former rates, and all sold. Number of sheep and lambs, 5, 97 " mutton slow of sale, at former rates ; lambs sluggish, bat 13 0 alteration in value. Beef, 4s to 6s per stone; mutton, 4d tO 5d per lb ; lamb, 6d to 6id per lb. EDINBURGH MEAL MARKET, JUNE I.—There the meal market to-day 6 sacks oatmeal, each weig hwe 2801bs. imperial, whereof 4 sold thus :—2 at 11 13s Odi and 2 at 1/ 12s Od ; average price of the whole 11 12s 6 0-12ths. 1 sack pot-barley, which sold at 28s. EDINBURGH HAY AND STRAW MARKET, JUNE Oat straw, from 7s Od to 8s 6d per kemple of 16 stones trop; wheat ditto, 5 s Od to 7s Cd ; barley ditto, 6s Od to 71 , • Hay, from 9d to lid per stone. DALKEITH MEAL MARKET, MAY 31.—There Were is the market t o -d ay 57 b ags of oatmeal, and 21 of barleyrue,, which met a rea d y demand ; no pot-barley in market. 1 Oat meal up on th e top an d second qualities tid per bag ; barleyoes the same as last week. Oatmeal, per sack, of 280 lbs. First Mir imperial .. ••• 31s 01 29P Barleymeal, per ditto ••• 231 Od Peasehteal —s Od Flour —s Od Od Pot barley ... —s Cd Od I •""9 Second Third. 30s 6d 29s 6d 22s 6d Od — 43 Od --s Od Od --s Od COAL MARKET. -YESTERDAY. Prices of Coal per ton at the closeoithe;arket: --. , Bate's West Hartley 13s 6d Joh ns o n 12s 9a C D u a r v r iso 's 1 15: o °l nfi'saWrtelesYtfia—rt. Hartley 14s 1 1 4 4 : it North av enrweorrctyhllwar.tilleya rt 14s s s 0 61' 8Areatdt0dny11........................ i 01d.... ....... 1 665 4s ssa 0 2, d Howard's W. H. Neth. 14s Od; Belmont T ra y n n fi e o b i l d a m in o - . Moor Butea 128 6d;Lambton . ........ T vi o e w s nl_ey.. : ..... .. ..... ll l2 ss ..... .. ....... . 158 6d . 14s 6d ... .. .... _ los 6d West Hartley l4s Od Russell'sH tton .•. e .... 155 Od West Wylam Wylam Wall's End, &c. !Hartlepool . ............. 16s _ GOBforth „... 6d Harton Hedley ..... 14s Od Thorn .... 143 6d Lawson lds 3diSouth Durham,, ........ .... 15, , 9 1 Northumberland Riddell Welker l3s 3clSeymour Harvey Coke 22s Od Harvey Wylam (ens.) 12s Oil! Ships at market, 251 Sold, 50. 60°IdddillLaLEadmenbtAlonairnrinuo.....s.e.......: :1 Lumley .......... RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS• .BRISTOL, JuNE 2. STOCK ExcitArriir..—The share market has been firm to-day, but there was very little business doing. The only sales reported were—Great Western, 92—Caledonian, Prefer , ence, 9—North British, LIVERPOOL, JUNE 2. STOCK EXCHANGE.—We have no improvement to notice to-day. The transactions have been very limited, and prices varied little from those which have been quoted for the last few days. The sales reported were—Caledonian (Greenock guaranteed, 16 Eastern Counties, 9 Lancashire and Yorkshire, 713x—Ditto, Fifths, 6I dis.—Leeds and Brad ford, 104 1 4—London and North-Western, 122 Ditto, New Quarters, 5 p.—Ditto, Fifths, 356 p.—Midland, 6734—North Union, Half Shares, guaranteed by London and North' Western and Lancashire and Yorkshire, 9% p,—South- Eastern and Dover, 20 5 / 8 —Whitehaven and Furness, 6% c. tnioeSos transactionsciia 6 K n—d E itha c A rse? bLouirairstnGAjis:. s—ed : s . :T rrdee h E o: c l e r e6 r s haEjaeharde_s' o,j -Caledonian, tcloseded Theto-day only i t ham (C), Quarters, 2 p.—Midlands, 67%. JUNE 2. t—Blanchester STOOK EXOHANGE.—A considerable amount of business was transacted in our share market to-day, without ma' without material alteration in prices. The transactions were as follow :—North Staffordshire, 6% dis.—Shrewsbury an d Birmingham (B), s%—Chester and Shrewsbury, 16. MONEY MARKET.—The quotation of gold at Parrs is about 5 per mille prem. (accordi ng t o th e new tariff), whic h , at the English Mint price of 3/. 17s. 10/d. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 25.291; and the eX change at Paris on London at short being 25.45, it follows that Aoki is about 0.61 per cent. dearer in London than in Paris. By advices from Hainburgh the price of gold o is about 430 aper mark, w hi c h , at the English Mint price n' 3/. 17s. 10d. per ounce for standard gold, gives an exchange of 13.71 ; and the 'exchange at Ilamburgh on London at short being 13.8 1 , it f o ll ows that gold is about 0.58 per ou t ' change at New York on London for bills at 60 days' dearer in London than in Hatnburgh. The course of " : 1, 110 per cent., and the sight .; Par of exchange between Englan" and America being 109 23-40 per cent., it follows that the exchange is nominally 0.42 per cent. in favour of Englan But, after m a ki ng allowance for difference of interest and charges o f transport, the present rate leaves no margin 4:t profit on the importation of gold from the United States. [ADVERTISEMENT.] Holloway's Pills Si mos t d effectual C ure f or Dropsy.-- Extract of a letter from Edwa Rowley, Esq., of the Indian Walk Estate, Tobago, dated April 8, 1852.—" To Professor Holloway. Sir,—l deem it a duty,_ I owe t o you and the public at large to inform you of a mos.', miracul ous recovery from that dreadful disease' Dropsy,' am which, under God, was effected by the use of your pills. was tapped five times in the course of eight months, and ail fully treated by two medical practitioners. Notwithstanding which I got worse, and my strength failed so much as to leave no hopes of r e cover y. I t h en tr i e d y o ur pills, whi c h in Si Professor Holl owa y' s E s t a bli s h me nt, 244, Strand, London. months perfectly cured me ."—S o ld by all druggists and at AN EXTRAORDINARY ANIMAL.--The following ad' Liverpool Mercury l a t e ly and house connexion att with ached‘l;eFrotrisesmalee,natneepxpceeelrleednt in the cart-horse harness, an established and extensive public• thereto." BIRTHS. OF A 80N. At Tunbridge-wells, on the 31st ult., the wife of R. N• Shore, Esq.. Bengal Civil Service. On the let inst., the wife of Edward L. Webb, of Eliza beth-street, Eaton-square. - OR A DAUGHTER. Armstrong, at orio k E! c q. escen r On the 31st ult., at Richmond-t errace, Clapham-road, the Ii de- ark, the wife o wif T n n o o ft m hEe a d s ard 31stnit.,Carfrae, MARRIED. On the let inst., at Pa!grave, Suffolk, Stroud Lincoln, second son of Robert Cocks, Esq., of Ladbroke-terrace, No t " ting-hill, to Lucy Sophia, second daughter of Martin Howe, Esq., of Pal grave, Suffolk. At St. P e t er ' s Church, Marshfield, Henry, eldest son *of the late Willi am Brook,E. , of Gledholt, near Huddersfield, o Frances Elizabeth vont) . gest daughter of D. Wait, Esq., Marshfield, near Bath. D Killed on the 11th April, lE at D the storming of Rangoo n, . Alexanderln "antry, aged g. N. Armstrong, of her Majesty's 51st L i g ht 21 years. He was the eldest son of Captain Armstrong, of her Majesty's :30th Regiment and Paymast er of the 7th Dragoon Guards, and grandson of Lieutenant - Genera! Armstrong, Royal Irish Artillery. On the 29th ult., aged 57; James Ellison, Eaq., of Bronlfr ton, second son of the late H. Ellison, Esq., of North Bank. On the 29th ult., at Hoddesdon, Herts, Anne Charlotte McAdam, widow of John London McAdam, Esq., aged 66- On the 29th ult., Mr. J. Foster, of Turnham-green. On the 30th ult. ' abed 50, Elizabeth, wife of Charles Ilan" cock, Esq., of Oxford- terrace, Upper Holloway. On the 31st ult., at Exeter, Mr. T. B. Tanner, aged 65. London Printrd ald Published by MURDO f Ku. L a , b u ., l2 d, Printer. et The Sun 011ie% 'So' 11 ,4 5. Strand, in the Precinct of the Saw, in the mutt" itiddleaex, ThunicUY, Awe; 1.602.