The Sun. — London, England, 1812-05-23 00:00:00

tore age, being awed so far back as Pseril, tat t, bat in 2 manner purporting. to be titiSVCT to hi= jesty's Deebration issued a tvaelveinontli.afterwarda. 'This was an occurrence which, tioAvithstapding a ll the talents oft he French GoverauSent, it tas not very easy to anticipate. Seine attvibuted. the St imgcness of the date to a clericel error. Bat let the crtcrun stances a, teeding the birth of this document be what they might, it did in faai contain a reyocationot the Berlin ail & Milan Deetees, as far as .ihey related to o America. There were some &fficulties as to the construetion witidh was to be put upon' this proceed • in', and it was for the purpose of ebteloing a satis factory solntioh those difficulties he trespassed on the L.:tention -Of the Hon=e, One difficulty arose from the,eircurastanee tlfart'is INfejeity'a Declaration lotimated, Ilia! the Oiders in :Cooneil would-be an nhiled on the revocation of the'Bealin and 'Milan Decrees, at any period subsequent ,to the date.of the Declsration.. This however appeared but .a ttifl'ng obstacle. It might easily be removed brpubliahing in the Gazette a fin tiller declaration, abet the spirit and not flie letter of the former Declaration should be attended to ; for he' took it for granted that his Majesty's Ministers did not care a farthing for the time at which the Decrees were:revoked, .provided the deed of revocation was ;legitimate. Another and indeed the only real difficulty arose from :hat phrase in hisalVlajesty'a - Declara t ion, which im ported, that the revocation of- the Berlin Decrees, on the part of Prance, must be unonalified and unconditional. What was the econstruClion to b© put upon this phrase ? Was it intended that ,it should or should .not overate to e revent the imme diate repeal of the Orders in Council, - as a necessa ry eonseqnente - of the French' revocation. On this subje& brie was most anxious to gain information, and he most heartily trusted that the -Noble Lord would be able to afford him such as might be sae tisfaelory to the country. But even should this be the case, it w as necessary that some further step should be taken on the part of Government offici ally -to notify the repeal of the Orders, in order to prevent many embarrassments that might otherwise .arise ; and here he could not help lamenting that his Majesty's Declaration, to which he, had Blinded, was couched in terms which to him appeared pun-, posely obscure, and which it was diffiaiilt for any trader.- to understand. The only conscouerice of . ibis unintelligibility would be to give employment to Courts Of Lassie and to involve a large portion of the commercial interest of the country in tedious, expensive, and harassing suits. He would conclude his observations by mowing, that there be laid be fore the House an account of the Sum; issued fo'r the clothing of the army and marines for the ten years 'ending Feb. 5, 1-8;2. Lord CASTI.tREAGH declared that he was always desirous to afford such information as his public -duty permitted on all 4uSje4s of public interest, and ahhough the Honourable and Learned Gentleman bad been'rather diffuse and argumentative in his questions,:lie had no hesitation in replying to them. Within the last two days a decree of the French Go vernment, which it ,was alleged had passed fifteen months ago, had been communicated to his Majes ty's Government., Jr had been received with ex treme surprise by -them, for they knew that the Go vernment of the United States had been pressing the Government of France for a more explicit declare ..tion on the . subjed of the Berlin and Milan Decrees down to the present' period. It undoubtedly was a feature peculiar to Ihe diplomacy ef France, that the Government of that country should remain silent on a subject of such importance to a State to which they owed- the most distinatexplanatian ; and hav ing refused any information for fifteen months, Should suddenly, at a period coincident with his Ma , aesty's Declaration, promulgate a document purport ing to be &led fifteen months ago, by which the Berliu and Milan Decrees were repealed, not gene rally, but exclusively and pointedly only. as they af fected the United States. If the Honourable and Learned Gentleman wished to know what effete this French- Decree brought under the . notice of his Ma jesty's Government amidst the extraordinary cir cemstances which he had described—circumstances unparalleled in the history of the' world—had pro duced on their mind, he (Lord Castlereagh) had no difficulty in- stating, that in their opinion it was in no degree satisfaalore, as considered with reference to his Majesty's Declaration. This must b'e evident -on the very face of the document. His Majesty's Declaration proclaimed that the Orders in Council should be consideted as annulled as soon as the Ber lin and Milan Decrees were generally and uncondi tionally repealed ;—not as soon as they sh9uld be repealed with respect to one nation alone for sinister • and hostile purposes to Great Britain ; but -that as soon s as they were generally and unconditionally repealed, ipso far to the British Orders in Council should las-se into disuse. With respect to this spar tial and limited repeal which had taken place, it had certainly occurred under - the most suspicious and disgraceful circumstances that ever attached to the "conduCt•Of any civil-sed nation; He entertained the strongest hones that the transaction would awaken America from the trance in -Which' she had long •slumbered. If any a& could more than any other copal& the French Government of duplicity and fraud, it was this spurious decree of revocation, brought forward at the present moment, for the purpose of ascertaining whether the British Govern ment, adopting the sentiments of the Honourable and Learned Gentleman, were dispose.o to consider it as :he kind of revocation to which his Majestra re cent Declaration was intended to refer. He trusted 'that he had distinCtly answered .the questioos' Which had been . put to him by the-Honourableand Learn ed Gentleman. As for the date of the French De ctee, that proved nothing but the fraud of the trans adion. If those'commercial persons to whous the fltartourable and Learned Gentlismso alluded, were of_opinion that hiS Majesty's Declaration bare a dif ferent cunstruSlion, it .was at their option to seek redress in the proper Court; although he confessed, that utaier ire circumstartes of the case it was impoasible for him to suppose that they could obtain any rensedyaw Mr. iiItOUGHATrI, in explanation, • allowed that if the date of the French Decree, was not a clerical er ror, it was.a trick most unworthy of a great nafion. It was an attempt to get rid of a professed principle of anion without undergoing the shame of retra&ing ir. It seemed he was to understand that his Ma - -ies , y t 's Gorcroment did not cdnsider the revocation, LONDON : Print s d by T HON ,At the SWN OFFI';E, as far as it went, suilicient to warrant them in put tingan end to 'the °filets in Council. - Heimplered them to mnsier t;:e lathers,‘ than the letter of his MAj , ,-ity'4'reee:.t cl-eiararion on this Subjtfo, and at lyagt repeal the . o! - ders; as far'as they related to-Am,erica; the ueces3ity of retaliating on that coun try the Measures of France haV7e. ctrased. The saute *son exis'tvd !ur repealing - the 0-ders as far as they related t„ A.Th'eitea, as wotald have existed for their genet: lepeal, had the rcvocation- of the-Berlin and Decv ees been total. • • Mr. Rest; slated she grounds on which he wag persladect , hat ihe 'date of the French Decree was not. a clericale;r9r.. After ;(1 tew observations from Mr. Stevens, Mr. Bating, 'and Lord Crairreagh, the conversation dropped, and the ritoriOn wai agreed to,.as well, as a subseqUent' one for a ,p.ri er of 3 siniihr nature. Lrrd CASTLEREAGH. exPro!sed his hope that in the present slate of his Majesty's G tvernment, an Hon and 'Learned Gentiepan opposite (Mr. H. Martin), would not presi forward the Bd!s which he had in,conduet through the Hodse. `Mr. MARTEN aciluiesing, the Committee on the Admiralty livgi3trar's Bid, and the Committee on the Exchequer lle.'inembrancer's 13,11, were postponed to Friday..' -• MR. PERCEVAL. Lord CASTELREAGH observed, - that in the absence ,of the . Chancellor of the_ Exchequer, he of course, did not intend to propose making any grant of raoNey to which the slightest objcdion could be raised ;- but as - .the House had already resolved unin-imonsly: to‘give the sum of 50,0q01. to the family of Mr. Per ceval, perhaps •be permitted him to move a Resolution to that etira in the ComMittee of Supply. On the motion of Lord CASTLEII7'AGH, the House then resolved itself into the cuonnatee of Supply, , and agreed to a resolution to 'graiit Ins Majes.y sum not exceeding 60,0001—for the Family of Mr. Perceval. Toe Repfurt was ordered to be received ,on Mon day. . On Lord CASTLEREAGH'S moving that at its ris ing the Hour should adjourn to Monday, Mr. PaOUGHAM expressed an earnest wish, that in order to complete the exarninatiA of the. wit nesses which he thought it necessary to call, the House wooki consent to sit to=morrow in the Corn . ._ -Mittee oh the Orders in Council; Alter-some coliversaton beween Mr: STEVENS, Mr..ROSE, and Mr. BROUGiIANI, Lord CASTiEREAGH consented to withdraw his [notion, on the umier standing (we believe) that Mr. Bioughato should endeavour to complete the examination of hi! . wit nei%es on that night ; but that`it it were found im practicable to do so, that the Committee should sit to...morrow.. Khe House then resolved itself into the Corn , atid proccOed with the examination of wit- nrssei. *,,* We find that in the hurry of sending to the press the Report .of the Debate .of Thursday "night, in the House of Commons, We omitted to state Mr. Rv DER.'s explanation, in reference to that part of Mr. CANN IN o's,gpeech, which represented him as travelling, as i he called it, out of the re coid,,and as having, as he thought, unfairly referred to some conversation between Lord LIV'!RPOOL and Mr. CANNING, regarding the notice which Mr. C, had given of a motion upon the subjed of the Roman Catholic Claims. Mr. RYDER said, that his Right Hon. Friend had entirely misconceived his meaning : for that, so tar from intending to refer to any thing that might have passed in conversation between his Noble Friend and Mr. CANNING, respeding the notice, he had not Sven known that the subject had ever been mentioned by either of•thein to the other. . - There were some very exiggerated reports in cir culation yesterday, reSpeaing disturbances in Yolk shire, and about the conduct of the Lt)cal Militia. We have reason to believe that they all took their rise from a slight disturbance at Wakefield, which is thus nientioned in the York Paper " On Tuesday night last there was a fracas at Wakefield, between several of the Agbrigg Local Militia, passing through on their return from York, and some of the Wakefield, on duty there. The parties were'in liquor, and quarrelled respecting the superiority ,of their respective regiments. The drums of .the Agbrigg beat to h arms, a party of Hussars were out, and, of course, great crowds as sembled. -Soon - after ten o'clock, however. all was quiet,. two of 'the Wakefield corps being taken into custody. In the town, that day, there were (in cluding tile Morley, who passed through) ,upwards of 3500 .soldiers." Bow-sTECEET.- 7 —Yesterday catnevn before Mr. GRAHAM and Sir \Vivi. PARSONS, the hearing of the information respeoling - the Pantheon Optra-,House, which stood adjourned from the Bth instant, against Carlo Lnwini, for , perfortn,ing in.a certain entertain [tient of the stage; called Diaveto a Qaatro o sia Le* Donne Ca7nbiate," withcut being duly ceased. Mr. POOLRY, as Couns:l for the prosecu cution, stated the.nature of theoffetice which the defendant stood charged, and to prove which he' called witnesses. - On the part of the defendant it was contended, that the case had not been - made out on the part of the informer, as. it bad not been proved that there was no licinse, or thA the defendant did perform for hire, gain, or reward. These objeaions were over-ruled by . the Magistrates, who conceived that it lay. with the defendant to shew he was . per forming under a proper license, and that the proof of money being taken at the doors, fox admission, was sufficient to support the charge of perfortlli7g for hire; gain, and reward. 'The Lord Chamber lain's license was , then produced by Mr. Austin, a Banker, in Henrietta-street, Covent-garci2n, in, whose hands it is deposited, and the terms of which license the Magistrates judged to be full authority for the performance orthe piece in question ; which was held to be a Burletta, a species of entertain ment•particularly describeckin the license. The.in formations against the defendant were therefore dis missed, and those against Moreau, another of the performers, for a similar offence, withdrawn. There are several other informations against the same performers for performing in a certain piece, a copy of whirl) 'had not been left at the Lord Chambeilain's Office four days previous to its being brought on ;he stage, and which were ordettet to stand over till a future day. MINZITIS._OF EVIDENCE, TAKEN BEFORE THE COMMITTEE OF THE W}IOLE HOUSE, TO WHOM IT WAS REFEREED, TOCONsI DER OF THE SEVERAL PETITIONS, WHICH HAVE BEEN•pRESENTED TO THE HOUSE OF GoMMONs, IN THIS - SESSION , OF PARLIAMENT, AGAINST , THE ORDERS IN COUNCIL. MeKeurii, 29' die Aprins, 1612. THOMAIi /34131GT0N, Esq. in the Chair. Mr. WILLIAM WHITEHOUSE called in and examined. LCoatinued from our Paper of Thursday.,] • You were not in ,the eotnitry - during that time ? , I was in America three or four months in the year 1800, at, the particular time when things were at the highest. Do you know whether the present high_ price of provisions operates, hard against the lab wring people in West Bromwich and the neighbourhood ?—I believe I need' not state that every body must be aware it: must be very oppressive. Do you recollect any other period in which it was really oppressive ?—No, I do not recollect any pe rig(' so bad as ;that, excepting the present tin se, but the nail trade was not 'near so bad then as , it is now. During the time of the last" scarcity, you mean that the nail trade was not is the state it is now ? No,. by no means: - You are at present going on accumulating stock in the exile ;cation of the market improving ?—We hive been till lately, we have reduced our hands from twelve hundred pair to five hundred pair : we •are not adding to our stock now, - many have ruined themselves, -and those who continue in that way are likely to do so ; but now we employ no more met - C.-an we can vend the commodities in. the mar ket, or perhaps a little more. Then you will turn off some of the bands you have at present, if the market does not impr6ve ? I do not think we car) keep theM m full employ; they are not in fell employ at present. Do you kn . = at all - what the difference of poors' , rates is in the parish of West Bromwich from the August of 1810 to the present time ?—I should think they e about ten per cent. higher now than they were. What do you suppose they were in the pound in the August of fain ?—I have observed that the poors" rates this rates this year are above ten per cent. higher than they were then ; but Ido not . charge my memory with what they were then, or what they are now. _ Have you no property in this parish, which is.yated? —Yes, I should think so. .You do_ not. know at this time what you believe t obe the mount Of the poors' rates in the parish of \Vest Bromwich ?—No, I do : not, .for I have, been journies for these two or three months; my active partner at home pays the levies, and 1 Ilave not, looked into them ; I am the travelling partner, and am always out on journies. lon do not believe that the difference of -the poors' rates between that time and the present is more tlin ten per cent: ?—No; from ten to fifteen per haps. You state that a man cannot earn more than 12s. a week .d present, by Making nails.; whole 13MilieS are employed in making nails ; worrier). and child ren are employed in making nails , How much will a woman or end get ?--A we woman will get nearly as much, as a man, and. a child half wages; a reao,, his wife, five or six child ren, we sometimes pay two or.three pounds a week to, so that it is better for them than,' single handse the single hands have deserted us very much, owing to the prices beirtg,redoced;' a man cannot main tain himseKand most of the young men have gone for soldiers; it is not natural to suppose we can get so good work from old men, and from women and children ; -the desirable part of the manufacturers are de,eiting us. Ydu do not mean to state twelve shillings as the average of the family, but the earnings of an able _man ?—Certainly. Have not,your exports to America fallen off in consequence of the invention of machinery'---At the time I was over there in 1 sou and 1803, there Was a pressing ipa'chine for pressing nails at New York, that I understood,manutadured fifty tons per week. Since - the time you allude to, that niaohinery has' been brought to considerably greater perfe6tion, has !it not ?--11 may.; I can only say that in- ten days of a considerable cargo of nails I took-there, I had sold every one, and made my remittances home ; it was a shorter rerhittance titan I could sell my nails for in the London market, notwithstanding those worse Then the_greater perfection of that machinery has not reddced your trade .?—No, it has not. When you speak of Orders now in this country for shipping nails to North America, do you speak of orders to youtselt, or to other persons ?—To other persons more particularly than to myself. Have you seen those orders ?—Yes. Does it-fall within your knowledge, that some of those orders have been countermanded iii conse quimde of thecheapness of nails in America ?—No, it does not; -none of the friends I have been in the habit of supplying have named that ;. tlwreiset Gen tleman from Boston, one of the most respe&able importing houses there, who is in this cone try, and we have 'nn order from him, and be complains more than any man I have ever heard, of their presoss in - jilting the nails; that there were an iihmerise quan tity made at Boston, and that it will i: jure the ma nufaCture of nails in this. country ; 'but he has left us a considerable order s Do you know what is the present state of the manufaCtore of nails - in America ?—Net, I do not; not having been theresince the- year' 1803, I can not say to what perfaion they are brought, 'but labour is so much higher there than here, that they cannot irpure us ; when there is a free intercourse we must have the trade. A common labourer gets his dollar a day there, consequently' they cannot tow to the manufaauring part ; we can always-cut them out when we have a free intercourse. Last Saturday's Gazette contained the Certificate of Mr. COLNAGHI ,and, Dr. MlLNrs', stating the value and perfeaion of the works forming the Prizes in Dr: THORNTON'S Botanical Lottery, which the, - A ' ctof Rirliament 'diretted to be done preparatory to -the drawing of that Lottery. /IA S WOOD, ofiln• 35, Maiden-lane, Covent-garden ;. and Published by WI I LIAM AR MI GE R SCRIPPS, South Mol N o , 112, Stracd, where 4slvertisements, Orders the Paper, 1 otters Lpr the- Editor, &c. (post-paid; LIIW REPOR COURT OF itl_NG's BENCH, NIA? It. ,THE KING'U. GRANDER -AND OTHERS. This was an indtanientat the in osecution of Sir Wrn. Curtis, Bart. ligainst aCoal-mercbant, a Land" meter, the Coal-tnetehant's Clerk, a . pd Several of his waggoners and servants, for a conspiracy' to cheitt and defraud the - prosecutor, by delivcii;;g him •.::.;'?3 bushels of itoead of 282. It appeared that - trio, Baronet had 'ordered two score of coals (2 1 chaldron each) to be 'sent to house - at Southgate, and that one, score was sen;! „ fist, accompanied by land 7 rpeters'. tickets, to whichy, , the prosecutor oh:rcn-d, be having ordered, poo/i . . and not wharrineasure. The tickets- described q sacks, whereas there we re only 93, and . upon mca - surinti 2 or 3.0 f the sacks, they were found to Coil taut only 2i busbek, whereas they ought to havA contaiued three each. These eircumstances induce!' Sir William to have the whole quantity Measured' when the above gtOss deficiency. was d ,, tested. The defendant's Counsel took legal or,j , eaions all the counts in the it - Khan - tent, which Lord Et,- L F'NBOROUGI-1 would leave to be discussed upon [lid ; record; but being - of 'opinion that' the defendants. could not be fixsd with a conspiracy, which tequirca an identity of guilt two persons, and that to cheat • and deli - awl Sir Win. Cuttis, no crirninality attach ing to Mr. Granger, who arrived in town hite the. night before the coals were sent off, and did not rise in time to see theM, the coats, having been fiu l c away without being-meashred in the presence ofthe land-meter, who was tsAci his . presence was n.. 4. cessary that morning; and the Counsel for the pro secution having no doubt of his honesty, and the guilt seeming ,to attach only upon the detendant Deacoll', the Clerk, 'who suffered the coals to be': filled in the absence of the meter, and either used old tickets, forged the meter's pame to n4Av on6s., or Used those which had been signedby him in , blank, it was agreed that a verdict of not should be recorded, the defendant's entering into a_ rule to give Sir William Cortis his full measure cr coals as a civil t!medy, and to discharge all his set vants, except such ag Sir William, upon examinatiou . as a Magistrate, should bepleased,to revere. THE KING V. THE INHABITANTS OF ST. GEORG 6, - HANOVER-SQUARE. • This was An indktment for notrpairingthe way . from Bond street to Hyde. Park. Corner. •E' verdi& of guilty 'was taken, with an understanding , that the dJendants would not be called upon I 'g judgment, provided the inconveniencies were•re' FRIDAv, MAY '2 2 . THE KING V. CROSS, RAWLINSON, AND MATV' t.r. - These were three indi&rnents by Mr. Droning ). 6 and other re4idtras at Charing-bois, against lb : proprietors of Greenwich and other coacl , es fof nuisance committed bj- them in plyiog Ti; first case (a; the weahe4t) . was' the only one trio' ' and verdicts of gulity p3ssed 'aglinst d.7waick. ants: - The nuisane,l' ani,t thelefore be teinoved• . SMITH E E.E) NI A MAY zz. This d.ly's. Market was but thinly. supplied wit 4 (Efferent. kinds dt cattle ; 'Veal and vve r° • cheaper ; . Pork is dearer; Beef and Mott:AA su1)1", ( 1 , Fast prices, and ihe trade in genera? W , , 3 , ` ,,, t ferent. The sans in the ilayinirket were . not Clover ha's dropped in price ow ; Flay and St tained last prices. The undermentionedprcefi- ,3 • numbers ate a correct statement att Beef, is. 4d. to 6s. 6d. Mutton, is. 4d. to 6s. .4u• 6s. od. to 74..6d. Polk, Is. od. to os. Bd. Lamb, v 5. to BS. 4d. „; $ 1,4 Beasts, 4eo. Shpep and Lambs, 7;400. Gaol' Pigs, 210; SMITHFELD HAYMARKET. Hay, 51. os. od. to 61. I os. od. Straw, zl. ss. ed. to S 3E Clover, lA. os. od. to 71. ss. od. - CORN-EXCHANGE, MAY 22:—The mark et to day has few fresh arrivals of Wheat, ipkt 80 111 ec t, W -. lerable remaining supplies, some foreign e 3-. 1 ,, sales dull, and hardly support list quoted print , Barley in good supply, also again lalling;, st re 34 most withqut buyers; Malt at less; Wilit e o cri pearly at last prices, scarce any G•ey, pric e ;o ri; urinal; Beans • each kind, at little vari 3t ' o nil there are tolerabl e suppliesof Oats on Pn' i t i ut7 this trade is at length - qnoted full is. lOwer. remains at late quotations. Wheat 8;s a r los a 13os Fine ditto - x 324 a 133 s Rye - - 75$ & Szs . , Barley -55 s a 65s Malt - - 84$ a 93s WhitePease(boil.)Bzs a ms Grey ditto -74 s a 7Ss Beans - 7os a 76$ , !.1 1 Tick Beans -67 S a 74; Ditto (fine old) 735 a Oats -47 s a 4; 05 a 5 5 '. Poland ditth - 5 7s ;a Potatoe ditto 5 9 ', Rape Seed - 74' Fine Flour - f 0 55 a 105 i Seconds - . - . BIRTHS.• The Lady of Mr. Serjeant Rough, of a Datighter.ro 114, • On Thursday .se'nnight, in. Leinster.strect, Lady of Major Kirwan, of the Gal M;.;itia, or a ter. -° s n• iji At Rosstravor, the Lady of Uclonei Ross. of a 'Ca . On Wednesday last, thaq...ady.of Captain Lascel lzs, stream Guards, .of a Sen. of °- The same day, at Barston, Warwickshire , the vv i • -1 , • ward Barber, Esq. of a Daughter. i_ ' M 65 At Walcot Churn, Bath, the Rev. Dr. ST.ralsti. , 4 Blcattar NetVcome, daughter of hia Gracc the late mate of reland.' . • E 4; On Saturday last, at Lambeth, Williartt Whiti n° i c : ol " t of Oevonshire.-street, Portland- place, to Miss Lambeth. - • - • Weil' On Tuesday last" at-St. George's, 1-13:10Ver-Seittarei'NWP limn B-Ttchamp Pr 'I or, ...sq. Captain t;- . L o t , and eldest son of. - S,ir. T. Beauchamp Praetor , 0 ' C idc"'" Park, in the County of Norfolk, Bait. to , Alln c • to ille daughter of Thoznas-c; regory, Esq. niece ird C°u6 iy late Thotnas Brograve, of Springfield-place, in th°, of Essex,. Esq. 'ort ° " ( - On Thursday, at St. Pancras Church, Mr. in-a l l 10 - Thring, of Warminster, Wilts, to Hairier, elg et of loseph Walker, Esq.. late of liampton, Wrior d , s ,. ll , l ; e Co , On Thursday; Mr. S. F. •Yockney, of Bediord-5.,..--d-t'fs‘i' vent garden, to' Litetitia, daughter of Luke 1 - 1 4,1 5 i1 of Gower.street,43Alloid-square ri ce i A.)1E1% On the 16th inst. in Devonshire.street, at the ad`l3%,,ler'' age of 79, MrS. Fo‘' , . - l-!r, relict of the Rei-. ilernard I' , late Reetor of Wornilry, lidits , Oe On Monday.la4, Mr, jOhn Hill, of AlderrnariourY' , fir, 59 years. On Wednesday morning, after 'a few days kiln esl i4 Peter Lawson; of Old Broad-street:. 1 . street' 0' On Weqr.esday, at her house in 1,0,.Ver Beiic&e 3' ; c cl the Z6th year of her age, th; Countess Dowager ' '' v ' field. ~ fise . The same day, at Bath, in the 78th year of his ag C, A son Ilan Boddain, Esq. late Governor of BomPaY• ~ is leti,'; ‘ , On Thursday morning, after a short illness, at i iit , t4'' ings in Great Mary.le-bone•street Mr. Woci ll ; . , . brated Piano Forte Player. , . _----- ton-F,Vect, C;rosveror•square, ), must be addressed.