The Sun. — London, England, 1846-07-31 00:00:00

feurtbMfttion SUN OFFICE, Seven o' Clock. LATEST PRICES OF SHARES BANKS, ASSURANCE, AND OTHER, COU PANIES' STOCK. From tie Official List, UNWB:II.D EVERY TUEADAY AND FRIDAY EVENING• LONDON, FRIDAY, JULY 31. ?DINT-STOCIL 33.8.708.13. 1 Dividend Amount , Paid. 1 , Pr. , ce of Name , of Company. per 1 Annum. Share. -- ------ t --- - --- ----- £ $. d. £ s. d. 40 0 0 40 0 0 20 % Australasia •.••• • • - • • 6/. per cent. 0 50 0 0 44 Britshlr orth American Si. per cent. 50 0 Commercial of London 5/. per.cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 I 23% Coloniai.. . ...... .... 51. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 16 Londe and Westminstr 6/. per cent. 1100 0 0 2 0 0 0 27% 0 L on d on Joint-Stock .•• 61 . per cent. ' 0 0 0 10 0 14% 2 0 0 710 0 Metropolitan • • • • • • • • • Provincial of Ireland.. 81. per r . it 110 000 0 0 25 0 0 4 9 8 Ditto, New......... SI. per c,ent. 10 0 0 National of Ireland .. \x 2 51. per cent. , I 50 0 0, 20 0 0 20 Nat. Provncial oi' Eng. 51. pc cent. 1 ,100 0 0 35 0 9 I 26 Ditto, New......... , 51. ~ ier cent. 20 0 0 t 10 0 0 I Union of Australlaw . 61. er cent. 5 0 0 25 0 0 26 Union of London. ••.• I p ~./. per cent. 50 0 0 llO 00 1 , 11 1 A --------- _ IN W.-MANCE COMPANIES. -------- Dividend Amount , Name of Comipany. 1 per of 1 Paid. Price Annum. Share. 1 ...--,-------.-..-.-,-. _ - £ S. d. 1 X s. d. Albion ••••••• • • • • • • • 31.10 s 1500 0 0 50 0 0 74 Alliance Brit. and For. 6 per cent. 100 0 0 11 0 0 19% Ditto Marine:- -• • 6/. per cent, (100 00' 5 0 0 5% Atlas •••••••• • • • • • • • • 13s. 6d. pr sh. 50 0 0 5 0 0 16% I British Commercial .. 7s.per share 50 0 0 50 0 7% Clericl,Med.&Gen.Life 51. per cent. 100 00 1 210 0 6% County Clown •• - - - .• •• .. los. 50 0 0 5 0 0 - 6s. 50 0 0 1 5 0 0 5Y Eng.& Scot. Law .. .. 51, per cent. 50 00 1 20 0 24 European Life Freema 3ol,6 ' ••••• • • • • Si. per cent. 20 0 0 , 3 0 0 6/. per cent. Stock. , - 134 Guardian , 5/. per cent. 100 0 0 36 10 0 48 Imperial Fire •• • Imperial Life ..... Indemnity M'Arine•• . Law Life.. ••- • • Legal and General Life - 50 0 0' 2 0 0` 6% London Fire •••• • • • • 108. 25 0 0,12 10 0 1431 London - Ship _. Marine.. ......... 5/. per cent. 100 0 0, 15 0 0 10% Med. Invlid St Gen. Li; 4%1. per ct . 50 0 0 20 0 3 National Loan Fund- 51. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 2 31 National Lite- .• • ..• • 81. per cent. 100 0 0 , 5 0 0 9% Palladium Life. ..... .. 51. per cent. 50 0 0 , 2 0 0 2/. Os. Phcenix - 1 - 205 Protector Life •• • • ... 5/. per cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 1/. 3s. Provident Life• •••• • .. 1/. ss. 100 0 0' 10 0 0 23 Rock Life •••••• • • • • • • 4s. 5 0 0 010 0 4 1 A Royal Exchange ...... 5/. per cent. Stock. - 198 gun Fire • • ••.• • • • • • • 61.105. - - 210 Ditto 111 e _ L I 6e. 49 - - Univerf.al Life CANALS. *I Dividend Ilames 01 r; !Dividend Names of y tt - Companies. ,1 ' per Price- Companies. a per Price. 4 Annum. 2 ' Annum.. .------, X X Ashtn & Oldh i 97 51.55. p c 70 If onmouthsh 100 81. 160 Ashby-d.la-Zlll3 4/. 70 Mntgomrysh 100 51. 98 Barnsley.. • • ;160 121. - 180 Macclesfield .1100. - 38 Basingstoke..;loo , , - - Neath ••• • • .100 171. 340 lirknk&Abrg , lso; M. 85 Nottingham. 150 121. - Cromferd .. • . 100; 141. ; 150 Peak Forest. 78 31. 40 Dudley .•• .• • !100, 4/. ; - Regent's .• • • 33 1/. ss. 25 Derby .• • • :•1100, 61. i 73 Rochdale .... iB5 41. 77 Ellstore&Chs , l33! 41. ; 55 Shropshire • . 1125 81. - F.rewasth .• • •100, 321. i 300 Somrset Coal'lso 71. 10s. 130 Forth & Clyd 100 4/. I - Do.LkFd St 12 61. p. c. 11 GrandJunetn IGO 71. i 951 i Stffrd &Wore 140 28/. 295 Grand Union 100 1/. 10s. - iShrcwsbury.. 125 IN. 230 Glamorgnsh. 172 13%1. 210 IStourbridge -.145 201. 1 315 Glstr&Brkly, 00 - - Strtfrd on Av: 79 11. 10s. 1 - Grantham • • 150 12/. ! 100 Severn and I „,,. , 7. ~„ Iluddersileld. 57 - - I Wye Rail. 3" - - 32 Kennt & Avn 39 7s. 6d. i 9%.Trnt& Mr- 50 30/. - Lancaster .• • 47 1/. 10s. I, .- ; sey, sh. Leeds& Livrp 100 341. I 520 ;, Thams &Med' 19 - _ Leicester .... 140 101. 105 ;Worestr & .., 2L 44 Leicstr &Nth 83 4/. 60 i Birming. d Loughborogh,l42 701. 850 WiltsBz, Bits 67 11. 11 Paid. Price. nocr.s. Dividend Amount same of Company. 'per of Alinum. Share. X s. d. £ s. d. Commercial • • ••..• 3/. per cent. Stock. East and West. India... 61. pr cent. Stock. east Country .... • • II. per sh. 100 0 0 I 3nd " • • 5/. pr cent. Stock. St. Katharine, ........ 5 per cent. Stock. Southampton •• •• •• 4/. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 141 21 113 10i1,4 27% :Name of Company. WATER-VITORILS. Dividend per Annum. Amount of Share. 0. d. 100 0 0 41 13 4 100 0 0 100 0 0 i 63 12 9 East London.... •• •• .. 8/. Gran . Junction •• •• •• 31. 10s. Kent • • • • • • • • 21. 10s. Vauxhall West Middlesex .• .• 51. ss. pr cnt. LIST or SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES. Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. I Price. Annum. Share. X S. d. £ s. d 1 Bank of Scotland ••. • • 61. per cent. --- 100 0 0 I 171 Royal ank of Scotland 61. per cent. 100 0 0 , 158 British Linen Company 81. per cent. 100 0 0 224 Commercial Bank 6/. per cent. i 100 0 0 1165 National Bank 6l. per cent. 10 0 0 ' 14% linlotB Bank of Scotland 7% /. pr cent. 50 0 0 9•2% Western Bank. North or ~ cotland Bank , Cl. per cent. 5 0 0 7 l;, Clydesdale Bank •. • Eastern Bank.. ••• •• • 5/. per cent. 10 0 0 j 11 Caledonian Bank .•. • • 7%1. pr cent. 210• 0 : 4% Edinb.& Glasgov,- Bank 61. per cert. 5 0 0 I 7N City of Glaagow Bank . 51. per cent. 10 0 0 ' 1314 Scottish Union Ins. Co. 1 51. per cent.: 20 0 0 1 0 0 245. 9d Hercules Insurance Co. 71. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 i 14% Lamm Co. tit Scetlnd Si. per cent. 10 0 0 All paid. i 9% North 114V.811 Incur s%l.pr cent. 200 0 0 10 0 0 28 Caledonian Fire Insur lOl. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 22 Edin'kurgh Life Insur 6l. per cent. :100 0 0 12 10 0 181 i Edin. &thaw. Railway 111.10 s. per c. f5O 0 0 50 0 0 75 Ditto, '4 Shares • Edin., Leith, •It G • • 20 0 0 i 0 0 0 16 Glasgw & Ayrs • ' 7l.per cent. 50 0 0 All paid. 75 Glaser y& Gre• 4 _..... 2/. per cent. 25 0 0 .511 paid. 16% Glsgw&Garn 1 ''''. -' 21 51. per cent. 21 0 0 All paid. , 40% Dundee& Arbroth '6/. per cent. '25 0 0 All paid. i 37 Standard LifeAssit - , 51. per cent. 50 0 0 210 0 i 9 BANK OF ENGLAND. ( From this night's Casette.) • An Account, pursuant to the Act 7th and Bth of Victoria, cap. 32, foil the Week ending on Saturday, the 25th day of July, 1846. ISSUE or.p)atrm.ENT. X. 1 X. Notes Issued ..... ... 29,312,944 Government debt • • 11,015,100 . Other securities • 2,984,900 Gold coin and bullion 12,875,243 Silver bullion .. .. • • 2,437,702 29,312,945 X 29,312,945 M. MARSHALL, Chief Cashier. Dated the 30th day of July, 1846. BANKING DU'ARTHEN T. Proprietors' capital.. 14,553,000 Itest, .............. 3,508,37 S P4blic &posits (hi chiding Exchequer, Commissioners of National Debt, Say info-banks, and Di vidend accounts) • . 3,438,101 Other deposits .. • • 14,305,311 Seven day and other bills Government securi ties (Including Dead Weight Annuity) • • 12,962,560 Other securities •• • • 14,583,107 Notes ....... .••• . • • 8,562,695 Gold and silver coin.. 636,482 '340,024 4 30,745,144 Z 36,745,144 q. MARSHALL. Chief Cashier. Dated tP.e 30th day of July, 114 i COURSE OF EXCLII Amsterdam C.F. 12 8 Ditto, at sight 12 5j6 Rotterdam .. .. 2U. 12 9 Antwerp• • 28 15 Ilahiburgt 1 3 15 % Alton . I'D .......... ..... .0.73, 3 days` sight .. •• THIS DAY). Gibraltar .. • • .... .. • • • . Leghorn ........ • . 30 60 Genoa .. ••• • .. •••• 26 20 Venice.. .. .... • • • ..... Naples ...... • • • • 39% Palermo, per oz . 119% Lisbon. ....... Oporto • ..... ••• • • • 5314 Rio Janeiro • • ...... • . 24 Ilahia ....... . Buenos Ayres .. •• .. New York, 21 days' sight Philadelphia .... • • - - - Ditto, 3 inntiths...... Varstilicl • . •••• .. • • tourdean.x . • . • • Prankttrt cu Maine.... Petersburgh, 3 Us • • • • • • Berlin •• • • •• • • • • ••• • • Vienna, effec. do Trieste, ditto.... • • • • • • Madrid ...... • • • • Cadiz .. •.. : .•• • • • •••• • • • • Barcelona • • • ..... • • • • • • • • • • • 25 85 26 15 26 20 26 20 1221; 10 14 10 14 35 3 4 36!fi PSICBS OF BULLION, PIA OZ. Foreign Gold in bars ...£3 17 9 Portugal Gold Coin .. 3 17 5 New Doubloons . 0 0 0 New Dollars • • ...... 0 4 9i4 Silver in bars ........ 0 4 111,‘ NX,WRY, ARMAGH, AND LONDON DERRY RAILWAY COMPANY.—(THIS DAY). A meeting of the subscribers to this undertaking, the Company having been dissolved on the 25th of April 'last, was called to have an account laid before them of the affairs of the Company. Earl Charlemont was called upon to take the chair. The SECRETARY read the advertisement convening the meeting. The CHAIRMAN then said it was not his intention to detain the meeting at any length; had he risen to ad dress them on the prospects of the Company, and the public advantages likely to arise from the line on the fulfil ment of their intention, he . would have done so iii great elation of spirit. Yet even now, though they had failed, not through miscon duct of their direc tors, 'or they had exerted themselves to the utmost, but tender circumstances and events which they could not control, he addressed them by no means under depression of spirit; for nothing had been neglected which could have advanced the interests of the Company, there wa s no c hi ca ne in the con ecru, noshing to conceal. A report would be read fully de tailing the patticularo and a minute statement of the ac counts submit ted to die shareholders. Dlr. OGLE, the solicitor of the Company, then read the report of the directors, which detailed the history of the undertaking. It stated that the capital of the Company was pr oposed to be 400,000 L, , o that 13 09- s hares had been allotted, and 6,555 paid upon, producing 16,387/.llos. ; that the directors, considering the small am , :unt of capital compared with the estimated cost of the line, and looking to the deposits to be paid into the Aczountent-General were inclined, on the 2d of December last, to stop . proceedings before serving ,•,. ,•• • that s intention of their's being the nc,..1,,.; Ins and was deprecated generally by tt knowa in in consequence of which the - directors , . elarenoluers encouraged as they were to do h* determined to proceeo t Irish itne, would meet with facilities in the the hope the standig oers of the Rouse of L ' ,7‘ r relaxed • their favour; that an unexpeaed ine,-Idrlli.enit..,.c.f.%.,rwards produced an almost Vniversal deaire on the pa. of the s hareholders themselves that the 15111 should be witildraw--' i ••c ht he tbe 25th April. 6reda g l Y 41 4, and dissolved the Company the A stateMeni. Itc=rits la k; before meetin„ showed receipts amountingto 18,356/. 3 s. Pd., from -1% stag deducted, for di s b u fs emen t s already made, 4,7041 • • 9d" stag whtch leaving a balance of 11,64.3/. Es. to !Aleut outstanding ac &ors. which have been given in to the amou nt of 10,520/. 7s. Id., from which, however, the directors hope to tie.able to make considerable reductions. y t ylsoNs wished to know why the directors had heat prElTapital so far short of 400,0001. rectors were-urged on by the share the report had stated ;_ and the • the expectation of meeting with ware..disappointed . in Parliament. id that by making a single line the ,t be attained and the undertaking /, it:lW; awn - feell ' , • ,-"iiredtort ware lad' P-,l ___,..44,ciatifig, of 1.746fi=-:' P- i :711f, egiglieerbol . ino,outk)- p 4 plio.- . " 4411 4 -..,.. .-- -.. K 11 S Mr. PARSONS asked whether there had been any reserve of shares for the directors. The CHAIRMAN—No, not one. Mr. FORBES, in answer to a shareholder, said that the directors had generally paid upon their shares, but five of them, three Irishmen and two Englishmen, had not paid up. These parties had been written to, and would be again, and the directors were in hope they would pay without recourse having been had to harsh measures. Each director had taken about twenty shares each. Mr. CLARK moved that the report read be received and ap proved of. Mr. PARSONS seconded the motion, which was carried unanimously. Mr. GALT, after some able observations on the merits of the line, and the attention of the directors to the interests of the shareholders, added his hope that on a change in the money market the undertaking might yet be carried out. The NOBLE CHAIRMAN, before putting the motion, adverted to the observations with which the motion had been intro duced, and expressed his hope that so good a line would yet be carried out—that he, at least, would be ready to aid in person and in purse. , The motion was carried non. con. Mr. PARSONS moved, and Mr. HOWARD seconded, that the the accounts received be returned to the directors, and that they be empowered to liquidate the same, after every possible reduction, and to return the surplus to the shareholders in the proportion of their shares. The motion passed nem. con. The Earl of CIIAI?.LE3IONT having left the chair, Mr. FORBES moved a vote of thanks to Earl Charlemont for his dignified conduct in the chair, and his unwearied zeal in the interests of the Company. This motion having been seconded, was pnt by Lord CLAUDE HAMILTON, who bad taken the chair, and carried by the meeting unari:nously. The Earl of MARCII3IONT acknowledged the honour, and again expressed his hope that the line would yet be taken up and completed. ;The meeting then adjourned. GOODWOOD RACES. (THIS DAY-BY EXPRESS.) (Continued from our Third Edition). Produce Match for 3001. Lord Glasgow's Emilia filly beat Mr. Gully's Buckskin. The Chesterfield Cup. Mongrel Ledger Connaught Ranger Thirteen ran. unE LONDON GAZETTE, (THIS EVENING.) WAR-OFFICE, JULY 31, 1846. sth Regiment of Foot—Second Lieut. A. W. Palmer, to be First Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Sleigh, who retires; G. J. Stewart, Gent., to be Second Lieut., by purchase, vice Palmer, July 31. 6th Foot—To be Captains. without purchase—Lieutenant J. C. Mansergh ; Lieutenant E. Staunton, July 31. To be Lieutenants, without purchase—Ensign W. L. Pen nefather, from the 19th Foot; Ensign P. A. Mosse; Ensign T. F. Puleston, vice Staunton, July 31. To be Ensigns, without purchase.—F. A. Sandwith, Gent., July 29; C. H. T. B. de Ruvignes, Gent., July 30; H. King, Gent. vice Mosse, July 31 ; G. Clarke, Gent., vice Puleston, Aug. 1. _ _ 19th Foot—J. G. Anderson, Gent., to be Ensign, without purchase, vice Pcnnefather, promoted in the 6th Foot, July 31, 26th Foot—Brevet Major J. Paterson to be Major, with out purchase, vice J. D'Urban, who retires upon half-pay; Lieut. C. Cameron to be Captain, vice Paterson, July 31. 40th Foot—Capt. G. A. Stanley, from half-pay Unat tached, to be Captain, vice R. Norman, who exchanges; Lieut. A. A. Nelson to be Captain by purchase, vice Stanley, who retires; Ensign A. R. Rundle, to be Lieutenant by purchase, vice Nelson ; The Hon. W. C. W. Coke to be Ensign by purchase, vice Rundle; Lieut. J. W. Thomas to be Adjutant, vice A. A. Nelson promoted. July 31. 51st Foot—Lieut. H. S. S. Burney, from the 25th Foot, to be Paymastmer, vice J. Gibbs, who retires upon halfzpay July 31._ 60th Foot—Second Lieut. G. Warburton to be First Lieut., by purchase, vice Robinson, who retires; F. C. Fletcher, Gent., to be Second Lieut., by purchase, vice Warburton, July 31. 68th Foot—Capt. M. Mulkern, from half-pay iUnattached, to be Captain, vice J. E. Dyer, who exchanges ; Lieut. P. C. S. Grant to be Captain, by purchase, vice Mulkern, who retires ; Ensign J. E. L. Gower to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Grant ; W. G. Stevenson, Gent. to be Ensign, by purchase, vice Gower, July 31. 74th Foot—Ensign W. K. M'Leod, to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Mayo, who retires; J. C. Taylor, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice M'Leod, July 31. 80th Foot—Ensign F. F. De Quincey, to be Lieutenant, without purchase, vice. St. John, who retires; W. H. Kerr, Gent., to be Ensign, by purchase, vice De Quir.cey, July 31. 85th Foot—Captain B. Taylor to be Major, without pur chase, vich 11. J. French, who retires upon half-pay; Lieu tenant T. E. Knox to be Captain, vice Taylor, July 31. 87th Foot—Brevet Major F. H. Robe to be Major, with out purchase, vice T. O'Brien, who retires upon half-pay ; Lieutenant W. P. Lea to be Captain, vice Robe, July 31st. UNATTACHED.—Brevet Lieutenant Colonel S. R. Warren (Major on half-pay Unattached) to be Lieutenant-Colonel, without purchase, July 31. BREVET.—Captain M. Mulkern, of the 68th Foot, to be Major in the Arm, June 28. STAFF.—Major - 'l'. O'Brien, of the 87th Foot, to be Deputy Adjut,!nt-General to the Forces serviing in the Leeward and Windward Islands (with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army), vice Lieut.-Colonel Hart; Major W. J. D'Urban, of the 26th Foot, to be Deputy Quartermaster-General to the Forces serving in the Leeward and Windward Islands (with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army), vice Lieut.-Colonel Archer; Major H. J. French, of the 85th Foot, to be Deputy Quartermaster-General to the Forces serving at Jamaica (with the rank of Lieutenant-Colonel in the Army), vice Lieutenant-Colonel Warren, who resigns, July 31 MEMORANDUM.—The appointment of Mr. George F. Fletcher to be Assistant-Surgeon to the Forces, on the 21st July, 1846, has been caucelled. The Christian names of Ensign 111‘Leod, of the 42d Foot, are John Chethem, not Cheetham, as previously stated. OFFICE OF ORDNAOCE, JULY 30. Ordnance Medical Departmen.—M. Combe, Gent., to be Assistant-Surgeon, vice Savage, promoted, July 30. Commission by the Lord Lieutenant of Berkshire. Royal Berkshire Regiment of Militia—Lieut. H. Pole to be Captain, vice J. B. Bulky, resigned, July 21. Commission by the Lord-Lieutenant of Brecknockshire. Brecknockshire Militia—lL M. Williams, Gent., to be En sign, July 27. WHITEHALL, JULY 27. The Lord Chancellor has appointed William Frankish, of the town or borough of Kingston-upon-Hull, Gent., to be a Master Extraordinary in the High Court of Chancery. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. Charles Murry Williams, ironmonger, Bristol. BANKRUPTS. Isaac Bird, grocer, Harrow-on. the-Hill, to surrender, Aug. 11, at half-past one, and Sept. 11, at half-past twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Alsager, official assignee, Birchin lane ; Lawrence and Flews, Old Jewry-chambers. Joseph John Such, auctioneer, Bolingbroke-row, Walworth road, August 11, at twelve, and September 4, at half-past one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Whitmore, official assignee, Basinghall-street ; Smith, Basinghall-street. Jonathan Wragg, iron merchant, Melina-place, Westmin ster-bridge-road, August 11, at twelve, and September 9, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Belcher, official assignee; . Miller, Sussex-chambers, Duke-street, St. James's; Hunt, Wednesbury, Staffordshire. John Palmer, painter, Worthing, Aug. 8, at twelve, and Sept. 8, at two, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Follett, official assignee; Palmer and Co., Bedford-row ; Reed, Worthing. William Elliott, corn merchant, Aug. 8, at one, and Sept. 10, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Follett, official assignee, Sambrook-court, Basinghall-street ; Hill and Ilea Id, Throginorton-street ; Daintry, Petworth. Ihoj imin Clark, porter merchant, Kingston-upon-Thames, August 8, at one, and September 10, at twelve, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Green, official assignee, Aldermanbury ; Lawrance and Ploys Old Jewry-chambers. Edmund Burke lapin s il ver smith, Ryde, isle of Wight, August 10, at two, and September 7, at eleven, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham, official assignee, Coleman-street,;- Watson, Basinghall-street. Atkinson Wilkinson, merchant, Camberwell, Aug. 11, and Sept. 18, at one, at the Court of Bankruptcy. Graham, official assignee, Coleman-street; Espin, New Boswell-court, Fleet street. Joseph Came, jun., groce', Falmouth, Aug. 12, and Sept. 9, at eleven, at the Exeter District Court. Hermanan, official assignee, Exeter; Jones and Co., St. Swithin's-lane, London; Bull and. Tully, Falmouth • Avery and Son, Exeter. Daniel White, potter, Baptist -mills, Bristol, Aug. 11, at twelve, and Sept. 7, at eleven, at the Bristol District Court. Hutton, official assignee, Bristol; King, Bristol. Saul Samuel and Walter Samuel, tailors, Birmingham, Ang. 30, and Sept. 17, at one, at the Birmingham District Court. Bittleston, official assignee, Birmingham ; Messrs. Linklater, Leadenhall-street, London. Thomas Wilson, grocer, Sheffield, Aug. 14 and Sept. 4, at eleven, at the Cutlets'-hall, Sheffield. Freeman, official assig nee, Leeds ; Fernell, Sheffield ; Duncan, Featherstone buildings, Holborn, London. James Jamieson, stockbroker, Leeds, Aug. 10 and Sept. 3, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Young, official assignee, Leeds; Upton, Leeds, Few and Co., Covent-garden, London. John 11 eaton, clothier, Henley, Yorkshire, August 11, and September 1, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Hope, official assignee, Leeds; Landau and Co., King-street, CheaT, side, London ; Brook and Co., Huddersfield ; Horsfall and Harrison, Leeds. Richard Gill, grocer, Richmond, Yorkshire, August 11, and September 1, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Kynas ton, official assignee, Leeds; Meggison and Co., King's-road, Bedford-row; Langhorne, Richmond, Yorkshire; Atkinson Dibbs, and Bolland, Leeds. Thomas Ingham Rayner, apothecary, Birstal, Yorkshire, August 11, and September 1, at eleven, at the Leeds District Court. Kynaston, official assignee, Leeds ; Jaques and Co., Ely-place, London; Battye and Co., Birstal; Bond, Leeds. PRICE OF SUGAR. The average price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar, the pro duce of the British possessions in America, computed from the returns mad e in the week ending July 28, 1846, is 375. 2 Ihd. per cwt. MARK ET INTELLIGENCE . (From the London New Price Current of July ) S I: GA n.—To-day importers of West India si ga 3 r l- - g rally refused to further reduce their prices, but there was a limited business transacted, the quantity sold not ex as ceeding 360 iihds, making the total . sales for the week 1,200 hhds and rrcs, and the decline in prices Is to 2s per cwt. REFINED.—The refiners are still free sellers, and submitted t i d m. f lni u : : a i ti • exb reduced waAntli.Th r: g tes for avert' hind of goods . , s t i 1 1 th horae. trade have purchased with reluctance, especially of the better qualities, takin only sufficient for the supply of their plied with all descriptions amounting to s afternoon . the market Was better sup. s,769.p a rio s ns of Bengal Sugar, three parcels, and not abiosvteo l\ as w 6 , sac le d re submitted . to public competi tion,pe, r at ew a t dechne on the rates of the Importers of Sugar the a produce of slave las k t ,o a t u z c s t l i G o N ns ._ of labour have displayed more firmness, an tnar lh e e t re has been a , although exceeding the f a iling oil' in the quantity brought to arrivals are again to a fair extent and the stock that of last year. MAcitiTlUS.—TheFe has been .eery little desire manifested to operate privately in an): description, and the small parcels disposed of were at prices in favour of buyers.. Mor As sEs.—Further p arcels ' of West India have arrived `sus there 3 , ;;G eelea upon lower terms; still the busineag; done has been extremely limited in all descriptions; the tendency of prices is still downwards. TEA.—Although there are sellers of Congou of all kinds upon previous low rater, still the trade operated with paution in all descriptions. For Pouchong prices do not improve, although the stock is small, and the demand good. There has been little desire manifested to operate in Twankay, although there are sellers upon easier terms. Of Gunpowder, the parcels disposed of were upon easier terms. Imperial has been sparingly dealt in. There has been little passing in Scented Orange Pekoe. Hyson has been sparingly dealt in. Other kinds of Tea have met with a dull sale, and in most cases rather lower rates are taken. COFFEE.—Althougli - thereieare sellers of West India upon further reduced terms, still there has been little business transacted, and none has been brought to public sale. COCOA.—West India of low quality is little wanted, and there are sellers upon low terms, but the better kinds are in demand, and bring firm rates. RICE.—To -day Bengal Rice was much sought after; at public sale 3,624 bags 2,400 pkts were offered, and nealy all sold at stiff rates, fine white bringing 16s, good 15s 6tl to 16s, middling 15s to 1.5 s 6d, low 14s 6d to 15s. SPICES.—To• day Cassia Lignea met with attention, and 100 boxes at auction sold at very full rates; 67 brls Jamaica Ginger only partly sold at 42s to 70s, and low 37s to 58s; 115 cases of cultivated Bengal sold at 28s to 325, it.ferior 21s to 26s ; 45 chests of Malabar fetched 27s to 28s for middling and good, and 25s 6d to 27s for damaged; 10 chests of Macc sold at 3s to 3s 6d. STMTS.—There has been much activity in the market for Jamaica Rum this week, and prices have furtheradvanced 2d per gallon" Leeward Island has been much sought after, and further advanced rates are offered. Calcutta has been pur chased with increased freedom, and advanced rates are paid. In strong Demerara several purchases have been made, and prices have advanced. In Brandy little variation has taken place, but the market ht a a dull appearance. CociiisizaL.—For silvers the demand has improved, and in some cases stiffer rates have been obtained, but black has met with little attention, and prices have fallen Id to 2d per lb. SALTPETRE.—To-dav the market was better supplied with Rough ; 2368 bags of Calcutta were submitted to public compstititi in, but the whole sold, in consequence of rather lower rates being taken. OiiB.---The demand has at length improved for Olive Oil, but any material advance in prices is prevented from taking place by the heavy stock. Linseed Oil has been purchased with caution on the spot, but the crushers are unwilling fur ther to reduce their prices; for forward delivery few buyers. In Rape a good business has been transacted, but at the low rate of 293 to 30s for pale, and 28s to 28s 6d for brown. Palm is wanted, and the parcels sold were at 27s to 28s for fine, 24s to 26s for middling to good, and at 21s to 23s for low quality. Cocoa Nut has been sought after, but there is yet little to be had. Of Fish Oils further parcels have been received, and the tendency of prices is still downwards. 'l'ALLow.—Russian has been purchased with caution by chan.llers and soap makers on the spot, although there are sellers at further reduced rates. For delivery there are few buyers to be met with, and prices are going down. For home made the market is however firm; although the supply is plentiful, a good demand has prevailed. Other kinds of Tallow have been only in limited demand, but at present little variation has taken place in the value. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. (THIS EVENING.) HOUSE OF LORDS. Their Lordships asembled at Five o'clock. Messengers from the Commons brought up several Bills. RUGBY AND LEAMINGTON RAILWAY BILL. The Earl of STRAFFORD moved the third reading of this Bill. v. Lord KINNAIRD objected to the motion, on the ground that the parties residing in Leamington had not been heard before the Committee, who decided against hearing them before they had had an opportunity of opening their case against the Bill. He concluded by moving the postponement of the third reading until Monday. Lord CAMOYS defended the Committee, and detailed their proceedings. No appearance was entered upon the petition from Leamington, so that they had no right to be heard. It was true an application was made to be heard, but the Committee decided against hearing them. But the case of the petitioners was fully heard on another petition, and therefore, whether they were beard or not in their case, their opposition was virtually heard, and was fully before the Committee, who were not guilty of any injustice. The parties had, however, no right to be heard, because their petition was not pre sented to the House until the 17th. Their appearance was not entered in time. He therefore should support the Noble Lord the chairman of the Committee (Lord StrAfford). The Earl of STRAFFORD said, he concurred in many of the statements which had fallen from his Noble Friend who had just sat down. Lord KINNAIRD said, after what had fallen form the two Noble Lords, who were members of the Com mittee to whom the Bill was referred, he must persevere in his motion that the third reading be postponed till Monday. LOrd MONTEAGLE said the question was—a Bill was referred to a Select Committee, and the parties ap peared, and they were to be deprived of the power of being heard. If the case was as stated by his Noble Friend, and that the parties did appear before the Bill was taken into consideration, he did think it was unjust if they would not allow them to be heard. What earthly ground was there why this demand should be refused?—(Hear.) Except what he had heard in the House that night, he was not acquainted with the matter before their Lordships ; but, as a matter of justice, he thought the parties had a right to be heard. Earl GREY said it was very natural that the parties should appear in the first instance, because it would decide in what order the Committee should considar the Bill. Lord BEAUMONT said he was himself chairman of a committee when the landowners were permitted to be heard when they came in due time. He did not think that any rule existed on this subject ; but it did appear to him that parties whose land was to be taken foreiby away, they had a right to be heard to the last moment.—(Hear.) Let them suppose a case of a bad Bill which was to be pro posed. Before the parties opposing that Bill entered into the expense incidental on opposing the Bill, they might wish to have some certainty on the question, and therefore he thought they were entitled to indulgence. The Earl of RADNOR said he thought that the rules of the Committee should be adhered to ; and, therefore, he conceived there were no grounds whatever for these allegations. (LEFT SITTING.) THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY EVENING, JULY 31, 1846. HOUSE OF COMMONS. The SPEAKER took the Chair shortly before Four o'clock. On the motion of Mr. GREENE, it was agreed, after a short discussion, that the Lords' amendments to all Bills brought from the House of Lords should be con sidered without notice, provided such amendments should have been first submitted to the Speaker. The report on Lord Kinnaird's (Sir John Webb's) Estate Bill was further considered, and ordered to be printed. THE STOCKPORT IMPROVEMENT BILL. Mr. BROTHERTON moved that the order of the day for the third reading of the Stockport Improvement Bill be discharged, in order that a new Bill might be intro duced. • • _ _ _ Mr. T. DUNCOMBE presented a petition, signed by 5,096 inhabitants of Stockport against the Bill. The petitioners stated that nine-tenths of the inhabitants of Stockport were opposed to the Bill. He would now move that the Bill should be read a third time that day three months, as he never would agree to the third read ing of such a tyrannical measure. Mr. BROTHERTON said that the motion he had made was tantamount to reading the Bill a third time that day three months. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said that unless the Honour able Gentleman would agree to the proposition of postponing the third reading for three months, he should feel it to be his duty to make the motion. The measure was a most atrocious and ty rannical one, and no person approved of it except those who were to benefit under it. The parties who opposed the measure had asked the mayor to call a meeting, which he refused to do, or even to lend them the Town hall; the result was, the meeting was held in the market place, and resolutions were adopted against the measure, which he believed to be a complete job. The parties had been deceived with respect to the Bill, and did not know for some time who was the concoctor of the measure. He wished to know whether the Hon. Member for Sal ford would consent to the withdrawal of the Bill with out the condition which he had stated, viz., on the un derstanding that he should be allowed to reintroduce it on a future occasion. If the Honourable Gen tleman would agree to that, he (Mr. Duncombe) would abstain at present from entering at any further length into the merits of the Bill. The fourth clause proposed to give to the town council of Stockport the sum of 10,000/. out of the public funds ; and in the distribution of that sum the ratepayers would not have the slightest control. The proposition contained in that clause was one of the most disgraceful proceedings which any body of men calling themselves liberal could make. _ _ Mr. BROTHERTON said that he certainly should not consent to the withdrawal of the Bill on the terms proposed by the Hon. Gentleman. Mr. DUNCOMBE said he would then go at length into the objections which he had against this Bill. Mr. HUME trusted that the Hon. Member for Finsbury would allow him to suggest, that as the promoters of the Bill were anxious to have it withdrawn, he (Mr. T. Duncombe) would be saving the time of the House by abstaining at present from any remarks on the de merits of the Bill. Of course he would have the opportunity of making those remarks which he intended now to make, should any attempt be hereafter made to re-introduce it.—(Hear, hear.) He himself had received several letters from some of the most respectable ratepayers of Stockport, in confire mation of the statement of the Hon. Member for Fins bury, and should the Bill be attempted to be re-introduced he should heartily join with that Hon. Gentleman in opposing the Bill, but he hoped that nothing would bo at present said which would have the effect of inflaming sntoheobtejermetison proposed to con• the excited feelings of the people of St oc kp or t. sent M r tO D th U e ilwietViralWEal oafitdhe he Bill on by the Hon. Member for Salford. Mr. BROTHERTON refused to alter the terms of his proposal. Mr. MARSLAND said that, as he was interested in the question, being one of the representatives of Stock port, he might perhaps be allowed to say a few words on this question. The Honourable Gentleman the Member had accused the mayor of bein g p ersonall y q uestion. He could assure the Hon. Gentlemannsburiyn t at the the mayor had been r e p resented as for e hostile to the measure , b ecause he had kept aloof, as he had himself. They never were consulted as to whether the waterworks should or should not be pur chased, and they did not know that it was in contemplation to do so until he saw the announcement in the. Guardian. With respect to the observation that this was a job, it was very far from the truth, as he was positive that there I was no job in it. lie had with others objected to many of its clauses. The town council of Stockport wero far more liberal than any body of the same nature to be found in Finsbury. It was composed of rate payers, and all were admitted from the highest to the lowest. It had been characterised es a gross job by one of the magistrates who was not a ratepayer, and who wished to make it a gross job. He begged to say that, having objections to some of the clauses, he had consulted as to the proper means of opposing them. Sir R. H. INGLIS said that the Hon. Member had offered to withdraw his opposition, provided that no other Bill were brought in. He (Sir R. H. Inglis) thought that the late period of the session would gau rantee that no other measure of the kind could be brought in. Mr. ESTCOURT said he had been drawn into this mat ter, and he had had a good deal of correspondence on the subject. He did not think that if the House were to appoint 'a Committee—he was satisfied that it would not, in the opinion of the Hon. Member for Montrose, be such a Committee as would be satisfactory. But he w ould further observe that if the Hon. Member were to bring in another Bill, as he trusted he would, he should have his support. Lord GRANVILLE SOMERSET was afraid that, if another Bill were to be brought in containing the same clauses, it would be equally unsatisfactory. Mr. BROTHERTON would emphatically deny the charge s that had been made against the inhabitants of Stockport on this Bill. If the motion of the Hon. Mem ber for Finsbury fir the withdrawal of this Bill were acceded to by the House, he should certainly bring in nother Bill to the same effect. It was only the cot ton-spinners who wished the smoke of their factories not to be stopped, and the publicans who wished to keep their houses open on Sunday, and persons in a similar position, who were petitioners against this Bill. The Bill was for making parks, improving the streets, and making other sanatory regulations. Great numbers of Bills of similar character to this had been passed this session without a word ; and if the Bill were thrown out h. should certainly bring in another Bill of the same kind. _ _ Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said that one division would do, and he should, therefore, move that the Bill be read this clay three months. Mr. HUME was anxious to have for Stockport fair play. He thought, under the present circumstances, it would be the best course to allow the order of the day to be discharged. That done, he hoped, before the next sossion of Parliament, some general measure would be introduced for the regulation of police in all towns, and also a measure for market improvements. He hoped that at present the matter would be amicably settled without a divisi.n. Mr. B. ESCOTT wished the Hon. Member for Stock port to give some information of the meeting respecting the Bill which had been referred to. Mr. M NRSLAND could not give any information respecting the meet ng. He had left the town before the meeting took place, and he had not had any com munication with the parties to it since then. Mr. BRIGHT wished to bear testimony that the pro moters of the Bill had no other object in view than the welfare of Stockport. The real difficulty ex perienced in that town was that the promoters Of the Bill were desirous of having power for the levying of rates for the improvement of the town, while the small ratepayers were against it, and at pre sent refused the granting of any rates for that purpose at any meetings that might be called for that pur pose. No danger could arise from the passing of the Bill, because the power was vested in the town council, which represented the great body of the inhabitants. He had risen merely to give his testimony in favour of the promoters of the Bill. Mr. DUNCOMBE said he would withdraw his amend ment on the understanding that the Bill would be with drawn. . The amendment was then withdrawn, and the order of the day for the third reading of the Bill discharged. Mr. BROTHERTON then moved for leave to bring in a fresh Bill on the subject—the Stockport Improve ment Act, No. 2. Some discussion then arose as to whether the Hon. Member was in order in giving notice of a second Bill the subject. The SPEAKER said that it was competent for the Hon. Member to move for leave to bring in a fresh Bill. Mr. T. DUNCOMBEihOtighttheHorise should know something of the nature of the Bill about to be intro- duced. Mr. BROTHERTON said he did not know what the Bill would be; if he had leave to bring in a Bill ho thought it would be one of the same nature as the pre sent Bill, which had been approved of by the Hon. Chairman of the Committee of .Ways and Means, Mr. Greene. Mr. T. DUNCOMBE said that the Hon. Member the Chairman of the Committee of Ways and Means had informed him that he had nothing t:, do with the Bill; if, therefore, the Hon. Member for Salford proposed to Oring in a Bill similar to the one approved by that Hon. Member, he did not know where it was to be found. Sir G. GREY wished to explain to the House the part he had taken in this Bill. Great obj ctions were made to several clauses of the Bill, and it was suggested by the Hon. Member the Chairman of the Committee of Ways and Means that it was a subject which should be brought under the consideration of the Home-office. He had accordingly examined the Bill, and had struck out several objectionable clauses. Mr. MARSLAND said that he had objected to se vi-ral clauses of the Bill, but he thought it a very anomalous state of things that the Bury and Manchester Improvement Acts shoud have been passed with pre cisely the same clauses as there were in the present Bill, and yet that this. Bill was not allowed to be proceeded with. _ _ _ Mr. GREENE said, that on a former occasion when the Bill was before the House, he stated his opinion that several., of the clauses were of a highly objectionable nature ; he was still of the same opinion. Mr. lIUME hoped the Hon. Member for Salford would not press his Bill at the present ime. He was sure that the Bill would not be allowed to pass with its present objectionable clauses. It was impossible for any man to suppose that it was possible to carry such a Bill as this through the House, and he, therefore, as a peacemaker, begged of his Hon. Friend the member for Salford not to persist in his motion.—(Hear, hear. Mr. ESTCOURT approved of the suggestion of the lion. Member for Montrose. There could be no ne cessity for pressing this Bill forward during the present session. The Hon. Member for Finsbury, as well as the Chairman of the Committee of Ways, and Mean , , had inspected the Bill, and pronounced it to be an unjust measure: - Under these circumstances he should vote with the Hon. Gentleman the Member for Finsbury. Mr. BROTHERTON said he had no personal interest whatever in the Bill, nor had he any strong feeling either for or against it ; but he did hope that the House would exercise its discretion in this matter. Whatever their decision might be, he should cheerfully bow to it. No tice was given of this Bill in the regular manner, and it proceeded as far as this, the last stage, without any opposition. No petition was presented against it, with the exception of that presented by the lion. Member for Finsbury. He did think that the town council of Stockport had been harshly used in this matter. He felt bound to divide the House on this question. Mr. DUNCOMBE said, that one of the Hon. Mem bers for Stockport (Mr. blarsland) had presented a peti tion, signed by between 5,000 and 6,000 ratepayers of the borough, against the Bill. Strangers were then ordereered to withdraw, when there appeared— For the motion Against it Against the Bill being brought in —8 'METROPOLITAN SEWAGE MANURE BILL. The report and further consideration of this Bill was postponed to Monday next. The British Guarantee Association Bill and the Sligo and Shannon Railway Bill were read a third time and passed. TENANT COMPENSATION. Mr. S. CRAWFORD presented a petition from a large body of the inhabitants of Castlereagh, praying the House to take steps to provide a permanent measure for providing compensation to tenants, after having regularly paid theirrent, and were about to be discharged from their farms. Such compensation to be adequate to the out lay made by the tenant whilst in occupation. Mr. HUDSON presented a petition from Sunderland against the union of the sees of St. Asaph and Bangor. CONSTITUTION OF THE CHANNEL ISLANDS. Mr. CHRISTIE presented a petition from a gentle man of the name of Duppa, residing in Jersey, praying for an extension of the British Constitution tri Jersey, and the other Channel islands. IRISH LANDLORD AND TENANTS BILL. Mr. S. CRAWFORD gave notice that on Monday next he should put a question to the Noble Lord at the head of the Government, respecting the Bills now l ing on the table for the direction of the Irish tenancy, and that he should also at the same time ask whether it was the intention of Government to issue any com mission on that subject during the recess. SURVEY OF IRELAND. Sir DENHAM NORREYS moved for a Select Com mittee on the progress of the trigonometrical survey in Ireland. ASSESSED TAXES. Sir DE LACY EVANS moved fora copy of the list of defaulters in payment of assessed taxes for the year 1845, ending the sth day of November, 1846, and pay able (in order to election qualification) on or before the 2oth day ofJuly, 1846, or two following days, furnished in compliance with the 12th section sf the Act 6 Vic. c.lB, by the assessors or collectors in the city of Westminster; and, if any reasons for non-receipt of these taxes in each or any case can be assigned, the same to be stated. Similar copies of the same list for the city of London and boroughs of Finsbury, Brighton, and Southampton. THE CHANNEL ISLANDS. Dr. BOWRING inquired whether the Government will consent to extend the inquiries of the Channel Is lands Commission into the general state of the laws and their administration in those islands. Sir GEORGE GREY said that he did net see why the criminal jurisdiction as well as the civil should not be extended to the Channel Islands. The subject was at present under th e cons id era tion of the Lord Chan cellor. Mr. CHARLES VILLIERS moved that the petition of Robert Maule Gillies and George Horne, respecting the duties on rye, peas, and beans, be pr inted. ADJOURNMENT OF THE HOUSE. On the motion of Sir GEORGE GREY, it was agreed that the House at its rising adjourn till Monday, SPIRIT DUTIES. Mr. MACKINNON said he had a motion for the equalisition of duties - on colonial and British spirits. He wished to know from the Chancellor of the Exchequer 1 whela wouktin tho most, ougivtaiezat glue 14 hi& PJ dual_ The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said the most convenient time would be at the time that the House went into Committee on the Customs' Dutios Bill, and when they proposed the amount of duty to be imposed on rum. Mr. MACKINNON—When will that be? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER—AII that he could say was, that it would be as soon as pos sible, but he could nat say exactly when. FLOGGING - IN THE ARMY. Lord JOHN RUSSELL said that as notice of motion had been given by an Hon. Member respecting flogging in the army, he wished to inform the House that he had caused the subject to be brought under the consideration of the Commander-in- Chief; the Duke of Wellington. The question was, therefore, at present under the con sideration of the Commander-in-Chief, not with the object of abrogating the power of inflicting corporal punish ment, but with the view of regulating it. He thought, therefore, it would not be advisable, till the result was communicated to the House, that the subject of flogging in the army should be discussed. Dr. BUWRING was willing that his motion should be postponed, so as not to interfere with the proceedings of the Government regarding the question. He would, however, wish the Noble Lord to understand that if the measure the Government submitted was not satisfactory, he (Dr. Bowring) should be at liberty to bring forward the whole question. He was bound, before the end of the session, to bring the subject before the House Mr. B. OSBORNE said the intimation of the Noble Lord was so tar satisfactory that he should not, under the circumstances, press the motion of which he had given notice. Mr. WILLIAMS-wished to know if flogging in the n , ,vy was also to be brought under consideration, and whether anything was to be done to regulate court martials in that department of the service ? Lord JOHN RUSSELL said the subject of the army, as he had stated, was under the consideration of the commander-in-chief; but he (Lord John Russell) had not had any communication with the Admiraly on the sul:ject of the navy. He would, in regard to the Hon. Member for Bolton, take care that, in case the Govern ment measure was not considered satisfactory, have an opportunity of bringing forward his motion. After a few words from Mr. HUME, __ Mr. OSBORNE said be pledged himself not to press his amendment, if the Commander-in-Chief recom mended that the number of lashes should be limited. The Noble Lord had not given any express pledge that the Commander-in-Chief would recommend a di minution in the number of lashes. Now, unless the Commander-in-Chief did limit the number of lashes, he should press his amendment. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHECUER having moved the order of the day for the House resolving itself int) a Committee of Ways and Means, ACCIDENTS ON EASTERN COUTIES RAIL- WAY. Mr. HUDSON said he was anxious to take that op portunity of making a few observations, in reference to the statements made the previous day by two Honourable Members, with respect to the Eastern Counties Railway. He wished to make this state ment, for the purpose of allaying any public excitement that might have been occasioned by the re marks of those two Hon. Members. He had made in quiries from the secretaries of the company, and he thought that the result of those inquiries would satisfy the House that, as far as the ma nagement of that undertaking was concerned, the public had less cause to fear accidents when travel ling on that railway than on any other. Since the opening of this line, which was in 1840, 11,000,000 people had travelled upon it, and, with the exception of the late accident, there had been only one death during the whole time. There had been only twenty one passengers injured since the opening, three of whom had their legs broken, and one a dislocated shoulder. The remainder of the accidents were of the most trifling description. He felt confident that this state ment would be most satisfactory to the House and the public. He would not as yet say anything in reference to the recent accident on the line, but the state ment which he had made he thought was but just to the proprietors and the public. There was as much if not greater security en the Eastern Counties than any other line in the kingdom. Mr. HORSMAN wished to know what was the in tention of the Government in reference to the Com mission that had been appointed at the com mencement of the session in reference to rail roads. He wished to know from his Right Honourable Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether the Government intended to do anything, in order to allay the public excitement and confusion which prevailed on this subject ? Sir GEORGE GREY said he was not prepared to make any statement in reference to this question. He hoped to be able to bring forward some measure during the present session, for the purpose of removing some of the inconveniences complained of in the report of the Committee lately presented to the House, which he hoped would come into operation before the next session. On the motion for going into Committee of Ways and Means. Mr. SPOONER said that he wished to state briefly to the House his reasons for giving his vote in support of the proposition of Government. He thought it the duty of a christian nation to lay aside every consideration of profit and commercial benefit or advantage, if they were to be purchased by anything tending to increase the slave trade. He did not think that the proposition of her Majesty's Government would give the least stimulus to the slave trade ; if he thought it :would he sa id he would not givehis support to the proposition. After the very able speech of the Noble Lord the Member for Liverpool (Lord Sandon) he would n©t have risen to enter on the subject if the Noble Lord the Member for Stamford had not risen after and made an attempt to invalidate his argu ments. That Noble Lord bad characterised the speech of the Member for Liverpool as one that could not be comprehended.—(Hear, hear.) He (Mr. Spooner was of opinion that that speech was the most concise and the most complete answ'r to all the argu ments on the opposite side. He said the demand for sugar had grown till it was more than the supply. If, however, they excluded slave-grown sugar from the market that only opened another market for it elsewhere im mediately ; a greater consumption of free-labour sugar at home was the consequence, and that created a vacuum on the continent, which was again supplied with slave-grown sugar. He begged they would observe what the effect of this had been on trade and the manufactures of this country. The trade between this country and the Brazils was an important trade ; but since the treaty had ceased, the Bra zilian Government bad raised their duties. The merchants there bad sent over their agents to the Continent, and there they were buying German goods in the German markets with English capital, and cam ing into their markets slave-labour sugar. It was a fact which could not be disputed that their efforts to do away with slavery had failed, and it was therefore completely uselesss to persevere in a system which pressed so heavily upon the comforts of the people. Their plan had also given the greatest offence to the Brazilians, who felt that their interests were wholly neglected. He was an advocate for protection, upon which he believed was the foundation of the prosperity of the country ; but if it were to be maintained, it should be so as a whole, as otherwise it would be the source of endless injustices to different parties. The question had already been so fully debated in the Home, that he did not hope to give any new argument for its consideration, but he felt that it would not be consistent with his duty to give a silent vote upon so important a question. Sir R. INULIS rose, and was (LEFT SPEAKING.) ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORFOLK . CIRCUIT.---Ipswich, July 29. Their Lordships opened the commission for this county, the last on the circuit, yesterday afternoon ' after which they proceeded to partake of the hospitality of Sir William Mid dleton, at Shrublands-park. This morning the courts were opened at twelve o'clock. There being an entry of eight causes only on the civil court, and thirty-three prisoners on the criminal side, Mr. Justice Williams presided in the Nisi Prins Court, and having disposed of two undefended actions, took next a " horse cause," which was only part heard at the rising of his Lordship. In the CROWN COURT.—( Before Mr. Baron ALDERSON.) Edward Juniper and Christmas Patteson were indicted for a highway robbery at Bungay, accompanied by violence, on the 15th of May last_ Mr. Cooper prosecuted in this case. From the evidence of Susan Baxter, it appeared that she was walking quietly about the fair at Bungay, on the day named in the indictment, when she was addressed suddenly by the prisoners, one of whom, after a little parleying, robbed her of her pocket-handkerchief, and then dealt her a blow which knocked her down. Having accomplished this manly feat, the two men quietly walked off; but the prosecutrix, on coming to her lege, pursued, and, overtaking them, gave them into custody on the above charge. At the close of the case for the prosecution, His LORDSHIP, addressing she jury, directed them to ac quit the prisoners of the more serious part of the charge, as it appeared that the abstraction of the property had been fully accomplished before the blow was struck, and the case did not therefore amount to one of highway robbery. When called on to make his defence, the prisoner Juniper protested that there had not been any larceny either, for it was all a practical joke, such as was usual at fairs, and be accused the prosecutrix of encouraging him and others to take the like and far more serious liberties with her on the night in question. Mr. Baron ALDERSON having left it to the jury to say whether they had any doubt of the prisoner's guilt, They, somewhat to his Lordship's surprise, returned a ver dict of Not Guilty. Walter Goddard, the bill against whom for the man slaughter of John Brown had beenrontherro,swainoquutisbityjotnh,elgyrhaicnhd jury, was arraigned on the charged him with f e loniously killing and slaying "a man un known, now here lying." Mr. Keano appeared for the prosecution, and Mr. Power for the defence. From the statement of the Learned Counsel for the pro secution, wascu t a m i 0 n it appealed that the unfortunate deceased, who 'an of intemperate habits, was singing, quite drunk, about the streets of Bury on the 15th inst., at 11 o'clock at night, when he was overtaken by the prisoner and another man. The prisoner either pushed or tripped up the deceased, who fell on the pavement; but, being lifted on his legs by his assailant, he resumed his devious course. From about that time he was not seen again till 2 o'clock, when he was seen by a policeman lying in a beastly and helpless state of intoxication under the window of the Assembly-room on the Angel-hill. Strange to say, no steps were taken by that functionary to remove him to a place of safety; but at 9 o'clock on the following morning, when the sight of such an object might perhaps have offended the lite, ati of Bury by coming " between the wind and their g en tili ty, " as they r es paired to the reading-rooms, the poor wre t c h was taken to a station-house, where medical assistance w as ca ll ed in, though too late, for he died at 4 o'clock. The Learned JUDGE, on hearing this statement, interfered, and asked the Learned Counsel if he could trace the history of the deceased more fully on the night i n question after half pastii2v'elcrck, and up tol - o'clock? &lag iaswerod is 4110 negative, . Mr. Baron ALDERSON said, that he did not think there was sufficient evidence to go to the jury, to connect the pri soner with the infliction of the injury -which led to death. It might be that the prisoner had tripped up the deceased, and he might then have fallen, and so have received the blow which led to death ; but it might also be that the de ceased had fallen down elsewhere afterwards, or received some other blows which might have produced the very ap pearances on which fhe surgical testimony was founded. He therefore thought that the case ought not to go any further, and, besides that, it appeared to him that the inquisition was bad, as it stated the deceased to be a " man unknown," whereas he was well known. Mr. KnASE then submitted that the finding in the in - qui,ition referred to the period of holding that inquisition. At that time the name of the deceased was unknown. Mr. Baron AuntasoN—Yes, but that is not the question now. 'The petty jury are now called on to find that the' prisoner killed a man unknown, i.e. to them, the petty jury. which is not the case. Under these circumstances, I shall direct the jury to find a verdict of not guilty. The jury, therefore, returned a verdict of Acquittal. ROYAL BENEVOLENCE. The following is an exact copy, verbatim et literatim, of an epistle sent, in 1804, from a poor woman in Scot land to the Emperor Alexander:— " Unto the Most Excellant Alexander Emprore of that Grat Dominion of Russia, and the Teratorys the Unto Belonging &c. &. &. " Your Most Humble Servant Most Humbly beges your Most Gracious Pardon for my boldness in aprotching your Most Dreed Sovring fur your Clemency at this time. " My sovring the Candour of this Freedom is on the account of your Sovrings goodness, in the Serving and Inlarging of My Soy, whose Name is John Duncan, aged 20 years, who was on a Premce, who was prisioner ‘vith Robert Spittle his Master Captain of the Han Spittle of Aih at the Time of the British Emborgo in vour Sovring's dominions in Russia, and is the only - Seport of me his Mother and Besaid I have no other fraone for My Seport and on the account of your Gratious Benevaller.ce Be Pleased to accept of this Smal present from your Ever Well-wisher whilst I have Breath. " The small Present is Three Pairs of Stockings for Going on when your Sovring Gos out a liuntiag, I would a have sent your Scvring silk Stockings if that My Sam Could Go in serch for it, but the press being so hot at this Time that he cannot not go for fear of being pressed, "if your Sevrin will be Pleased to axcept of this and faveour me with an anseur of this by the Bearer and lett me kno what Famely of children your Sovring has I will send Stockings for them for the Winter betore Winter Comes on, as also what Sons and what Daughters yott might have. " Most Breed Sovring I am your Most °bait. and Humble Servant Till Death Elizeabeth Wilcox. St. Neunsons by Sterling April 2d. 1804. Please to Derect to Me to the Care of Robert Raunce in St. Neunsons by Sterling. The above production does not stand in need of any comment, but the reader may be gratified in knowing that the illustrious personage so addressed ordered Eli zabeth 'Wilcox a remittance of 1001., which was paid to her by the Russian Minister in London. Unfortunately, some interfering literary character took upon himself to correct her second Letter to the Emperor, thanking him for the money, whereby it was divested of that origi nality, the loss of which is greatly to be regretted. IMPERIAL PARL lAMEN T. HOUSE OF LORDS, July 30. Their Lordships assembled at Five o'clock. Messengers fr. m the Commons brought up the South- Western Railway (London -bridge Extension), the Dub lin, Belfast, and Coleraine Junction Railway, and a number of other Bills. WEST CORNWALL RAILWAY. Lord BROUGHAM moved that the evidence taken before this Committee be printed. He made this motion in support of the prayer of a petition which he presented, and which set forth that the Committee had improperly rejected evidence with respect to the property of certain landowners. The custom in the law courts was to hear all the evidence offered, and then to decide upon it. This the Committee had not done. Lord TORRINGTON defended the decision of the Committee, of which he was the chairman. No evidence was rejected which had any bearing on the case, and he considered the Committee bad ful filled their duty in a proper manlier. The Noble and Learned Lord asserted that the Committee was not to decide upon the evidence that came before them, and the Noble and Learned Lord stated that upon his legal knowledge. Now, his opinion of the Noble and Learned Lord's law was not quite so- high as to inducel him:.-to agree to his opinion on this subject. The Noble Lord stated that the evi dence of the landowners was improperly tr. atcd. They (the Committee) had gone through a great mass of evi dence with great patience—(Hear.) The Committee having heard two or three gentlemen give evi dence on a particular point, thought it was unnecessary to hear any further evidence on that subject. They had also refused to hear evidence with respect to the Tamar river. They did so because the Admiralty had fixed the size and span of the arches of the railway where it crossed the river at Saltash. Now, that being the case, the Committee were unwilling to hear the evidence of a junior member of the Admiralty on that question. He had also a view to prevent ing further expense to the promoters, after the expenses they had already incurred, and to the recommendation that had been given by the Com mittees before whom this Bill had been tried —(Hear, hear.) Taking all these matters into consideration, they thought they would be justified in taking the course they did.—(Hear, hear.) lie could show their Lordships that all justice was rendered both parties, and that the Committee had endeavoured to dis charge their duties to the best of their abilities. They had no objection to adduce the evidence, which would convince their Lordships of what he asserted.—(Hear.) Lord BROUGHAM said he should like to know what possible interest he could have in this matter. He was neither a shareholder, a president, or a vice-presi dent of any railway, and yet he was treated as an advo cate. The counsel to whom he had alluded said that he had never seen so unsatisfactory a statement as the re port of the Committe— Viscount TORRINGTON—Name. Lord BROUGHAM—Did iot the Noble Lord know his name ? He was there some time ago, in his wig and gown. Viscount TORRINGTON—There were three or four of them. Lord BROUGHAM—One of these gentlemen had waited upon him that morning, and, made his statement. With respect to what had been said by the Noble Lord as to his (Lord Brougham's) knowledge, the charge then preferred was brought after four years, against a judge who had occupied the highest position on the Bench. He (Lord Brougham) had disposed of 2,300 cases, out of which there was only one reversal, and but seven appeals. The Noble Lord might know what an appeal was. If a party thought fit to object to a judgment, an appeal would be made to that House.—(Hear.) They rejected the evidence, and decided against the Bill. Now, as for his not knowing anything about the Bill, why in the title of the Bill the term west had been omitted. Lord TORRINGTON begged, a.; the chairman of the Committee, to say that the evidence had been heard. The Earl of DENBIGH, as one of the Committee, would assert that nothing could be more fair than the decision to which they had come.—(Hear, hear.) They had heard Mr. Brunel and Mr. Hubshaw on the one side, and that of the engineers of the opponents, and the decision was unanimous in the Committee. Lord BROUGHA NI said that they were entirely at issue on the point. It was not likely at all that the pro moters of the Bill would make a statement contrary to their own interest. The line-wars to go from Falmouth to Exeter, and the other was to go by pl y . mouth to the same place, overlooking altogether the navigation of the Tamar, and crossing the river at Saltash. This petition was from th e landowners, and they petitioned on the ground of the demerits of the line which had been approved. Lord NELSON denied that there had been any overlooking of the merits of the Bill. The only evidence of any importance, as it appeared to th e Committee, and the only case in doubt at all, was that of the town of Bodmin, into which they entered very fully ; so fully that he had himself taken an immense mass of notes in order to hear what the counsel on the opposite side had to say against it, for the Committee expected that they would make a great point of it, when, to their surprise, not a word was said upon the matter. The only point on which they had rejected evidence was one in which the assent of the Lords of the Admiralty was necessary, and which they had referred to the decision of the Board of w T h r a o d l e o . st T th h e e c e a v u i s d e ei w l c a e s a f d a d r ulacergdeornththaen part that o t f ak th en e i p e a r r t t i l e i e s promoters. the notes taken in the ca use. The Earl of DENBIGH pro duced four folio sheets of Lord BEDESDALE said that although the Noble decideLwas a very proper person to House of Lords, yet h© had not ord a (Lord case Birnougthheam u ) quite so much exp erience in Committees as other Nobl e Lords, and he thought that some measures sh ou ld b e taken to prevent the very reprehensible practice of counsel of adducing evidence on a matter which they never intended to prove. He did not support the opinion, that when the Admiralty were of opinion that a certain portion of water should not be interfered with, that the Committee on Bills should take it for granted , p they ought only to take it as the o pi n i on o f a public body. There were cases in which th e Admiralty had done The injury j p u e r t y i t insteadion was tohfegnood laid b o y n t t h h e e i r table,decisions.and the motio n for printing the evidence was understood to be agreed to. S L A i V t h E ri I r t e Y. w w his m Lord BROUGH A Mmotion on the slave trade, reser v i ng hi s observationsuntil o a ti future of the Sugar D u ti es Bill. stage CORN WALL RAILWAY. e E r c a h r l a u S t a G n d E R t dAerssSof presented Falmouth a petitionit u f r r from th the e Cornwall Railway Bill. TAW VALE RAILWAY. Earl FORTESCUE presented a number of petitions from several places in the county of Cornwall against the Taw Vale Railway, and praying that the petitioners might be allowed to be heard against the Bill. The petition was then ordered to be referred to the Com mittee sitting on the merits of that Bill. SMALL DEBTS BILL. Earl FORTESCUE also presente. 1. a petition from certain inhabitants of Torrington, in favour of the Small Debts Bill. Lord CLARENDON said, that it would be in the re collection of the House that a petition was presented kirk and Preston Railway, from the Liverpool, Orms praying that soiree indulgence be given might to them. AL OW MOP. he old tba" 646" wo ohy &Wiwi from the standing orders there were many c: . .her Bills which had also a claim upon their indulgence. Ze was for adhering to the strict orders of the House, if the House had given proper notice, for it was not until th:' ith of May that they made it, and only two months be fore it came into operation. A totally different state of things existed now from that which existed at the time they made the order ; for they never contemplated thaS the session would last to the third or fourth wet k of August, or they would never have made it.—(Bear, hear.) He did not perceive the public utility of sending these Bills back again to the House of Commons, at an expense of 'some 50,0001. or 60,e01;1., which he was assured was the case with the Liverpool, Ormskirk, and Preston Railway. He would, therefore, propose that a Select Committee should be appointed to examine the case of these Bills, the labours of which Committee would not be very severe. He would, therefore, move that such a Committee be appointed. The Earl of WICKLOW was surprised that the Noble Lord did not move some proposition more con sistent with justice ; he was of opinion that it was their duty to rescind altogether these unjust orders.. The session was likely to last until the end of August, and it wi old be most unfair if they should neglect to perform the public business whilst they did sit. There would be no difficulty in obtaining an attendance of Peers, and if there was why they should enforce one. He was sure that if the matter was placed before such Peers as had net attended upon Committees, they would at once signifi their willingness to attend. Lord MONTE AGLE considered that the p - oprsiticr made by the Noble Lord (Clarendon) was the bes t " which could be adopted, and he did not in any means agree with the suggestion of the Noble Lord who bed just sat down. There was a case of great hardship made out for these Bills, and he did consider that they would act most unjustly if they did not give these 3ills some indulgence. But he did entreat their Lordships rot to countenance any proposition which would allow those Bills to stand over for another session of Par liament ; the greaest inconvenience had already resulted from such a proceeding.—(Hear, Lear.) Lord REDESDALE said that there never was a rule made which gave greater satisfaction than the order complained of. The parties promoting Bills had ampl e notice upon the subject. He should propose that the . rules should be strictly adhered to. Was a Bill to be admitted because it was one, two, four, or ten day.% ° c a . late ? The t erm o f d ue dilli gence wa s too vague, 613 5 . the only means of securing due diligence would be, tbeb the promoters should be ready with their Bills by a ter' taus time. There was somethi ng wan t e d i n th e consti tution tution of a Committee more than the selection of five ab le members. There should be some person, at any tet e ' able by experience, to direct the others. They might a s well call five persons from the corner of the street as Pr point five persons who did not know anything of the sub' ject to decide upon the merits of certain Bills. Il e ' stated that the necessity for these rules was borne out by the fact, that at the present moment he, as chair' man of the Committee, had the greatest difficulty to obtain Peers to attend to the Committee. There were some Peers who, no doubt, would be quite ready to • serve on Committees, but really there was looking after required in these matters, there was no use in mincing the subject. He should oppose any departure from the original plan, as laid down by the House. After a few words from Lord DEVON and Lord CIA' RENDON, The resolution was agreed to. THE GAUGES BILL. Lord BEAUMONT thought that this Bill s bouldl be proceeded with at the present period of the s esst- The effect of this Bill would be to perpetuate the bres_ll't of gauge, and leaves an immense quantity of the Wo at gauge in existence (the narrow gauge). He would oppose the measure, if the Government would pled . • themselves to bring in a Bill, next session, to secu r e e , uniform gauge throughout the country. He nsaintaie.i; that the narrow guage was a dangerous one. It give him the greatest pleasure, if the London and Yel • line were to he laid out on the medium line. Earl GREY said that for all practical purposes 0 1 1 colleagues were of the same opinion. be present, 13d was only intended as a temporary measure. "r e - n y this Bill would pass. There was a sufficient argq 3 for that to be found in the aspiration of his Noble Fri end ',. o that the London and York Railway should be laid out _Lo a medium gauge, thus increasing the number of ga.e,l in the country, and adding to the present difficub., the question. He thought if the Bill were to pas s ja • would prevent much increase of difficulty, even clu the ensuing recess. the The Earl of WARWICK was understood to pre s• narrow gauge on short lines of railway. Lord REDESDALE said he entirely agreed in n3 tl3 .sr tl principle which had been recommended, as to uniformity 0, 7 0 of gauge. He thought, however, the narrow gaug e _ so , sufficient for all practical purposes, and while it was o f it ought to be kept in view that many thousandsco., strutted,miles were gauge he thought they would have to resort to a ern _i:o either this gauge. constructed ,ln ns tit o u r tin a g bo a u tunbieta. of gauge. He trusted the attention of the Goy t would be early next session directed to the subjec . The House then resolved itself into Committee. a „, The Bill passed through Committ ee without ante" ment, and was reported to the House. SUGAR DUTIES (CONTINUANCE) BILL- , 0 This Bill was read a second time, and ordered to read a third time to-morrow. PORTEITRY PIER BILL. This Bill was read a third time and P"se RELIGIOUS OPINIONS RELIEF BILL. This Bill was read a third time and Pa "eta' the House Several Bills were forwarde d a sta g e, and adjourned. ROUSE OF COMMONS, July 30. a POOR REMOVAL BILL. „ bit , On the order of the day for the third reading ok ' Bill being read, this Bill, and he hoped that after he sat down an e r ic sue l, Mr. V. SMITH wished to make a few observatienve,t! nation would be given of the course intended to be pe. on s t His object, he said, was not to provoke diocuss si t ote present on this important subject, but he vieSt t t he this opportunity of expressing his regret tZ‘ P . ,l.4ect recommendations of the House on the !" - ,,, 1 t5, of the Poor-law had not been carried - tl e late Government, The two other Bills which had been introduced hi be , I w v i n t u h ld the beef Right t H h o e n g .B re a a r t o e n s e t t, b t e h n e he regretted, were likely "' o o dropped. Indeed, the Highway Rates Bill be i ; e yed withdrawn for the present session. That Bill, be u e L - e rtb. f e or s T g ff eu tt classes. The other Bill, to empower the Govtrn:-0:of to advance money to landlords for the improvere` 1.0 their lands, ertemtobetrh , 'on. was at present under consiaerati ..sure, his opinion it was a most excellent .133"„iight and he hoped th a t th e p re sent session "'feel. not terminate before it had passed lent PI The recommendations whi c h h a d bcen made 'i r st met with any attention by that House. The 0 tbe those recommendations, and the most important ,se t th i l consolidation of rates. It was stated in that repel. Os there were 24 rates then existing in the countri',ur.' they were applied to nearly 20 0 different _ roe po,es. Excessive inconvenience resulted frl o re 0 trouble of levying these various rates, and 0 1 .7 . Th e re general consolidation of them was recomme nd t° e rt legal way of levying them bad degenerated o f the illegal practice, and the House was aware 0 l' lf4 great difference between a practice an° , is co t o; and the illegal practice in use led tom allfirlec.itho veniences. Another point which was recontni.oo of ~' ,; the consideration of the House was, the tats si- rceee'e holder instead of occnpier. They %101 the substitution of paid officers in theplace of 1 lu eterY ones. There were then in the country 180,00 0 v ° _Olaf officers, and if the House woe substitute wassim „Ire number, with some small payment, he ;_,, that it would be found beneficial to the ps pi., he Noble Lord to the' lie had called the attention °t t ke • • points, because now was the time to raa . . s i the regulation of 1 ?!', 4 ; great change affecting taxation throughout the country. • They had .I` eo ife arrived at the close of the angry contest bet s ol two of the great interests of the country,..,piti the Noble Lord should seise the e ppor r fe. 41 0 of doing justice to one of these interests fowo;1 protection they had lost, in doing which ke d oe. su pport of the whole $m re ceive the willing i' sn He wished to know whether the Right Hon. Genie te who had charge of the Bill did not think it :Idri s ; role which had been pursued o 4 pursue the course - ~,o w ,. Committee in t-e .- tu uce occasions, and nominate his C • . h p session? The Committee might not be able to P et ure. this session, but they would be able to call for r ed iao w hi c h might considerably expedite their preee _, next year. n id, 61 The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQU eh " - sii _A glii °I to the statement made by the Noble Lord at "•-e be co 0 the Government, almost all had, more or less, be en t hat mr th into effect. He had but to remind the thelletzsesht Bill was before theother House' Removal Bill had been 0 13 a n il read a third time Mitteet,7 e rs the improved Drainage Bill had been in COfrig' was to be recommitted ; the Maintenaneeneinies,7 t he had been voted ; so had the Relief for the Prosecutions measure _ sse d; _ du e had also been r intru h ich Police in Ireland measure would be ro ues , early next session. st i o as „ Th e o ther que Were 1 t ee the Honourable Gentleman alluded to lif tions of , 1 wort „ t or great importance, and well 1 ,,,, ape" 1 consideration of the Government. . 1 • 1 '" • a ore l°o went made by the Noble Lord of his inteoti° b e , the question e POOI ,ern' 11 of the poor-rates and the flee. Committee next session would prePer e e cos'n it tlemen during the recess to enter upon the _. 3301 , , e tion next session with increased advantil l y tte e Oil w would not be of any avail to go into Coo? Sa e hassubject so near the end of the present ses , ~,,e n sl ~t Mr. BANKES said if any complaint lie.o a _ t hongt'_. as to the measures named, he would. ch_lestattoweinr, it very improper, considering the would . 1 17 0 p° _.„, which the Government had come I ' - ' ',GO: 4-J ' Majesty t 11 , The measure as now taken up by her than lta GO :4-J ' ment was decidedly a much smaller one _l o t, pi, duced into the House by the Right Hon. -1.0" - _Y,, te cl is h r y t t' considered that the country would be disapfilTie vis if it was so blame could not justly fall uP h o tbo I ltte with which be acted. It was not true t i with V v with regard to the poor were PasS e con t ee The te attention to their wants and sufferings• up ied a was the case. The subject had oe4, it b me at attention of able and eminent men- passed wit an MO to the measure offered to them, if it Orettefi t. any alteration he did believe t h a t the P b 60 a , ...,bo would receive an injury rather th fa n le Ic e his, In Dorchester an immense number of peot: .a _ diu g t did not belong to that town, but, n otwith !_u_ ; „ e air,. his constituents were not opposed to t h e %Tail ligh t be dustiial residence. In many cases an ivjYt ree°g ; done if the principle of irremovability Were poor 10%; nixed. When in a manufacturing tovvn,.c _,..,,, e r aig who had been formerly employed in agri a r,, ;district, have remieiseenses of days that were E.. , 1 .,,,ixt0 • , which it, Re taw it will aow ''. Paid Price, t ''~ o