The Sun. — London, England, 1805-06-04 00:00:00

B.arsroL ..rusT, 3. 03 Saturday lUst the whole of the Garrison of this city, including the Rbyal ilristol Volunteers, were reviewed. on Durdhain Down, by Gen.. TAALETON. Ibr ten o'clock the Troops were ,on the ground, and the line formed in the following order : Sir John Jervis's Rifle Corps. Limit' Rifle Corps. Shropshire tyliliti4. South 14von , ROM Carmarthen Fusileers. voi.vtrrt.tis. . . • ... -,. Royal Monm out h . Wells and Bruton. —Chipperadni and Warminster. • A bergovenny. Royal II istol 'Regiment of Infantry and Artiliell. Clifton, Westbury, and lienbitry. Bath, and Bath Comfit. The Royal Bristol and ,\Vaterbourne Cavalry k ept the ground. About eleven o'clock General TAaLETOZT dild Suite arrived on the ground, passed down the line in front, and returned in the rear, when , iew. ,• they formed into conipanies and p passed, in Rev Prder both in ordinary and quick t i me ; . a f ter which the line swas again tbrmed on the same ground as before. Th e ßegiments then f orme d a close column in rea r ,of Grenadiers ; ,and afterwards in front of Light Infantry ; each resp6aire Regiment mancetw . ring alike. The line being Agniiiforttted, each Regi , rn ent charged from right to left, and then retired in t) rderly t i me. The Regiments then adVanc e d a n d a gain formed in close column, whenc;en.TARLETON addressed t`, .11i in a.very appropriate and energetic , 61seecb, and complimented the Roy: BristolVoiun • tee ns on their very - steady and soldier-like Rppeai ,,C,e, and the great improvement - they had made in Ten: dLeipline since last he reviewed them—The ',wits remarkably fine, and an iinmense concourse 67 gmtators (as might have been . expeaetl)•atteded to g,, --, at) truly grand and gratifying a sight. ZSSEX dGRICULTLTE. os I'luirsday. last a selea party of distinguished ligiculturists, of various distrials, assembled at Fe 7 fIX 101 in this couiltv, to view the Farming Ira il."veatents'of C.C. -I,Va.s TER N, Esq. After inspeaing et..; e., apital Stack of Devonshire Cows, South Dow . n , Pialittict4tl celebrated, Pigs, they rode over hp , and viewed the Improvements on his Ilew NMI, which were deservedly admired: the t law a three-horse cozve.k,breastect Wheel-plougn, at W(lrk, called the Old Esser Pletkgh, fit, p Ploughman crossed a still piece s of land so 6161- with which I ,Y, that. the Gentlemen made a subscription for rt on the field, as a - reward for' his merit.- , !- 7 e4ttlP(atg the Gentletnen present Were; the Duke of . 'llo, Lord AVILL.I.I% RUSSELL,. Lord RoBEET ..,;&,'Ell, Sit Mr.p.owLEy, Sir ROBERT HAR . -, i.l), Mr. B. ProwAnD, Mr. CuRwEN, Mr. Butch o Ne., 411)er (Or Thetford), Colonel 'IV Fl' N ELL, CO -Itoriu,el 111440-yxg, AIL KORTWRIGHT, • mv , J. . 6 il.l.tY, Rev. H. B. Dunr.r.y — , Mr. Vm.r.c , ,, Mr.. witf:4"uall Mr, IN T AkEFIELD; &c. whO dined _ L, the Hospitable Lord of the Domain. The next ..,,-.01.111,48, they went to the Essex. Agricultural ,:. wet,'"ing at Chelmsford, Where the Cattle, &c. i..i. the e,i, eldlibited ~.fur the Prizes of the year. Here ti t , ( 4 ', rt Y N• as joined by .Lord PETRE, Mt. 1. FAN It , hie,,,-()th,a,Mr.. P• L. Wardtrr, &c. &c. His.. to 1„ the iiuke o tltta)FoE O very kindly consented cow 1 - ' 3lll e one of .t ho Umpires. on, this occasion, 114)11t11Yit,l1 Sir Wm, Itowlzy and Mr. WEB te sh irr 1.7 ,Seiety, &c. Afterwards adjourned to' hen ~,._," tali; whore more thaw a hundred lk tem ;()1,,,t14 7 t,,i, oir Oietidi sat down 'to u plentiful dinner, adjwie;tinutuioyls'a in the Chair. After dinner the , i4 , , ds iria ` (l :ll of Prize s of the Society's Silver Medals I - tit `~, a.. • 'r duc *%. and M I . * ~. had a very P--€k , •rs. kl. JotINBTON. The )I'l' lienetit last night at ...nrury-Enne T..heatre.. upon an 1 lt*:'l John Bull They are go ing ir H tAli . ' '. Scotland. Ars* H. (/ . 1 d engagement into ss..‘vriten,, for' ,f . h e., ()i lk ., , ' l °N SpOke 1 farewell addre. ew,c441.4 by Mr. 'Li:Ny.ls. was ti 404,.. •. .. ,which., ...„, ' . '4. r. an ll\ ' It ' ' ' 't.COvent-Garden .• very N:ifell it 1. 1 , . ( V irg, 11. Sinnoms qut •, . ,. Katie.. -,leatre at ille.end' fth nesent season, ano , Iliterod • . ° ,/ • 1.- . into articles witn the Afanagers of DrnrY , ~tae, ' b‘,l:4(', representation of Shrewsburylf4, i., 4g-ta warinlyclisputed. The ") lip e , crag th 'IIILI. family 100,0001. it is said, to last contest i 3 stated , l a-Ster RE ~ of n H Ttl late blaster of th e . 4TII, son .....r. EA . A , 1)r„ School,- has the Montern at Eton this year. if ~••:,.e 1-fon. WILLI .•011w1.F has of Ilirnse. Auv''vsluli,date .tbr P o .4 rfsli -s ire, -' in the room of Si r " CARNzorx Bart.ased. • Yesterd .) kii Q • aY 18 Prisaners were tile and fonc Y ' 4 of whotn were convieted of felony, , were ae9uitted. the s , tenee ,f• d . i : arae day the sessioni ended, wbensen for "',.,. -,14i we 3 patsy(' • on Joseph hreilliam• Aldrich, 1 ..; ...,;-: 1 11. g s:ii. 73. in the dwelling7house of Ch f arf a C." I N ' in Gartivzil and John Davis, alias Irkitiry i ()il. Aill. Tr(,y for forgery; • Ann Percy, ' ' ' to the viii h for stealing in a .1 dwelling,h°use tie rt 61 . d, for evSes:sva,teen were ordered ' to be transpree h4nt." years, iiiz„ catitorine K e i ty , Gmrge D u ck - . Ptio.„%,„_•4l4er Aferriman, ,belt Karl.'!, James • k:ii,,,,,;-'s,) Charlotte 114*(0, eiWre'V Qsbnrne, Barnes, 41144-‘l4' 41144, Robert Farr, lsobefiri k I`474lticr Pia 'k' AT r -' William Costal, ' Ctit h • ' r ? . O ' - ar In' . ' e Tot- Aiii , , rza/lt) -1041: ICecne lane Mix, iani . Charl e p , " IN III , 3 'or ter, haid Cotterell. liG h fo(1:tt? 1-4.1 hniirisonect i n the i - rouse e of . Co .rx rr e e , c i: li.:Ad_ ilk terrn of one year ; . fOurieen an- § • '14 e l i• n1111 - i r t ils ill the same ,_,;'raol; ten to be imPri" le b e 1 9 I's ew flate for varions' terms ; (iiklia.prtely NvilitrPed! ""d nine ''af them were ' Ibur of thorn , juliraerft4l hy proclamation. r ili6 : Cott then a "Ilia to the eth of 'July. . Ifily 1.1.7.-„A• Meeting lately took place in the vic:- i, 'I n ' between Joiix ,DArin Mou.ta;s,,, triottt ;4111town, and ROBEAT BuritKEi Esq. ' 4 tfiQ iitit7-11iii, both in the.Connty of Dublin, 'llea 4r *4B 'evenly wounded. .a ve, 'ti Je, ,g(xkl• fight was yesterday determined bY. !IN a 1;11:ttlarp R'Astse, bet‘vet.....t l a im„, , nisti, , , s r awy er , • 11/e .trt:h'ler of boxing cotihriti,, at Paddington. ire I:ii-iltarits, after invince a di,;uute at the Mi. ~,„I'lclii ;,1,,e1;11.e.).;0.(... agreed' to 'tigh t , ' t'or t A,..'o' tuille`ts' his , Ille. t Li ,t4A.41, itud the butcher L'oat • molts, tit., iv' r('lttida of t . 1 .i. • - . T 1 •, \ ;ere both 41)1 i. •Idr{. ooxing. it) X ~. Y ' l'fitnr.d. • P 0 • . .- rßon, , t • THE SELECT COMMITTEE OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS ON THE TENTH REPORT. (Continued froise our Paprr of resterdaj..) The Examination of A. TAQTTEII, Esq. taken befOre the Committee on the Tenth Naval Report, 4th I May, 1803. When did your private agency . begin with Lord - Melville ?—I do not recolle&; I had 'no regular appointment as private agent. Were any a&s of private agency performed by you for* Lord Melville previous to your appoint ment as Paymaster of the Navy ?—Not any. When did the private agency cease ?—lt has not , ceased:: r. , Have you performed any aft of private agency since the execution of the releases in 1803 have. What Zia you mean by members- of Lord Mel ville's family ?—I mean his domestic servants. [The Witness wishes, to amend his Answer of yesterday, in page 20, ndMay.--4 have already amend ed my Evidence of yesterday, so fat as to say, that I had made advances for Lord Melville to others be-. sides Mr. Tweedy; and I have now further to amend my answer of yesterday, by saying, that some of those advances made to others than Mr. Tweedy, but constituting the somas I said yesterday of 20,0001. and to which *to-day I have added two or three thousand pounds, were, advancedfrom fundi exclu sively of public money ; and I. wish in this to re fer to my Evidence given before the COmmissioners of Naval Inquiry, in 'page 220, as an explanation to an answer that I then gaVe on tha subjea, and which, as I did not recollea at that time the cir cumstances now mentioned, was then perfealy cor-. re& ; and I must further amend my evidence of yeSterday by now saying, that I do not think Lerd Melville gave me verbal, or any instruaions, in some instances wherein I had advanced sums 'of money for his Lordship to Mr. Tweedy.] Upon what authority did you make such ad vances ?-4 aced in those instances from my own judgment in the management of his Lordship's con cerns. You had at times Verbal instruaions from Lord Melville ?—Yes, I had. Of the sums advanced to Mr. Tweedy and others, for the use of Lord Melville, stated by you yesterday to amount to the sum of 20,0001. to which you have added a tUrther sum of 2 0r,30001. to-day, can you now, upon recolleetion, state how much was public and how much was private money. ?-1. have no means to viable me to state that circumstance with accuracy., Please to state it generally.—As nearas I can state it, about one half public and one half private. Do you mean to say one half exclusively public ? I do. Do you _mean the - other half exclusively pri vate 1-4 mean the other 1131 f to have been prin cipally advanced' fi•om my account at the .house of Messrs. Coutts and Company. Of the advances from to to 20,0001. mentioned in the Tenth Report to have been made by you to Lord Melville at different . times, !lave you now any means of judging what * part was public and what private money. ?—I believe the whole to have been advanced from' my.accounts at the house of Messrs. Coats and Company. . . Was interest always paid by Lord Melville to you on. thoge advances ?—.lt was uot. Was it ever paid ?—No ; his Lordship paid the no interest for those advances What was it that induced you to exercise your judgment in making payments to Mr. Tweedy, without any, dlredlon from Lord Melville so to do; 'was it'frona any knowledge of the manner in which the' monies, so paid to Mr. Tweedy were to be ap plied on account of Lord Melville ?—I allude to the private tmnsaaions in the management of Lord Melville's private business, in which .1 had general dire6tions, although.not specific direalions on every occasion. Are the Committee to understand that some of the payments made to Mr. TWeedy, on Lord Mel ville's account, were made to Mr. Tweedy as to p person who had the management of tord Melville's private affairs ?—Mr. Tweedy had not the manage ment of Lord Melvillosa private affairs. Explain to the Committee what circumstances tould induce you to pay to Mr. Tweedy money on account of Lord Melville's private atbirs, without Lord Melville's aireaion, and without considering Mr. Tweedy as being any.private agent of Lord ?-1 . have already said that I had general diree.tions from Lord Melville id the management of his private affairs, though , not specific ones in every instance ; and when any sum of money,came into my hands upon his Lordship's account, I have taken it upon me to apply that money without di reaions from his Lorthlop. What were those general clireaions?—lt was a general permission to ati tore Lord Melville pa I thought proper, in his private affairs. The ; urther Examination of Alevander Trotter, Eq. taken the 6th of May; 1606. , • Can you rccolleet any thing about the re-payment of the specific sum of 10,001. which, at your com mencing Paymaster, Lord n •Iville acknowledged to you that he owed to the Public do , not.' What sums did yon annually receive, as my Lord Melville's private agent, from other sources, saving those of his salary as Treasurer of the Navy do not recollea any regular 'annual payments tirade to me upon his Lordship's account, although I have re teived considerable sums, and in many instances. Can you form any opinion of the average ?—r cannot. Did you receive, as far as you are informed, all Lord Me'vines private income in the capacity of his private agent believe 1 received all his in come arising in . this Country, but 1 cannot speak with certainty. Did you receive for him his salary as Treasurer of the Navy ?—I did. The N.‘ bole of it ?---As far as I recoiled, I did. Rave you brought the date of the rowses ?-4 have.. What are they ?---They were signed by Lorcl Melville upon the isth of Februafy 1803, and by myself upon the 234 of that month. You having stated yourself to be still private agent 1 ,, Lord Melville, what circumstances then led to 'the execution of mutual 'releases between you. and Lord Melville ?-1 know no c:r,curnsthnre, except * that of his Lordship having left this Country, and, as thought; without' any intention of return ing; and I conceived that-it Would be a s.itisfaaion to Lord Melville as well as myself that our heirs, in case of the death of either of should have as little trouble as possible in arranging the set - eral at couds which had exited so long betsireen us. Were the Niels of account deFtioyed before Or after the execution of the releases ?—lt was after that date. ;Who preceded you as' Paymaster ?—Mr. Douglas. Is he dead ?-41e is. When did he die ?—ln December 1785. - I Have, you any Means of knowing how long Lord Melville bad had in his possession the sum of 0;0001 , . which Lord Melville acknowledged to have had in his possession ut the time you became Pay master ?—I have not. How did Lord Melville describe to you that lie had become possessed of the 10,0001. which he then described himself to owe to t the Navy Pay-office ? I do not remember that his Lordship explained him , self to me upon that subject. , Had you any mear.c; of knowing whether that had been applied to a public or a Lordship having express ed his apprehensions that it might ultimately be pre judicial to his interest. In what manner I—He did not enter further into explanation with me on the subject. Mien you described this sum of 10,0001, to, make part of a stun of 30,0001. which had been ad vanced to Mr. Tweedy for theiise of Lord Melville, did you mean that you had been informed bypr. Tweedy of thii sum being SQ applied ; or was it from Lord Melville only tint you derived•any knowledge of this sum of 10,0001. I—lt was from Lord Melville only that r had any information upon the subjea Of this 10,0001. ; and if I have conveyed, by 'my thr iller evidence, the idea that this Sum of money had been sdvanted to Lord Melville ththugh the means of Mr. Tweedy,. I must beg to COM& that statement. Has that :0,0001. been re-paid`?--That 10,0001. as well as every other sum for which Lord Melville has been indebted e to the Public, as Treasurer of the Navy, and which has accrued since the year 1786, when I was appointed Pay-master, has been re-paid. The further Examination of Alex. Trotter, Esq. taken 7th May, 1805. Where were the releases executed between you and Lord Melville ?--The release was signed by his Lordship at his own house in Scotland, and by my self in London. Did any conversation relative to the account= books, or their de3truEtion, take place between you and Lord Melville previous to their being destroytd ? —The subje& never came under consideration be . - tween his Lordship and myself, to the best, of my recolleftion. Has any subsequent convergation taken place on .that subject -?—None ; • except of my having inforth ed his Lordship of , the lila, and tue regret which we have both. felt On the circumstance. Has any communication byletter, before or since, taken place upon that subjeft ?---None whatever. Can you give to the Committee any more precise explanation , of the conversation which you related yesterday to have taken place betweeu you and Lord MeMile, at the time he acknowledged his debt of 10,0001. to the Public, when you commenc ed Pay-master; or can you •noW recollea: with more precision what the words were used by Lord Melville ?—.l am sorry, from the distance' of time when that conversation took plate, that I - have it not in my power to give any 'further explanation upon tliat subjel. Please to repeat his words as near as you can re . collca, that you before mentioned.--His Lordship' expressed .his apprehensions that the circumstance alluded to might ultimately prove prejudicial to hint, and which I concluded to be meant in a pecuniary light. - '4Vhat circumstance ?---The circumstance of the 'balance put under my charge being about to,oool. less than the balance for which he was accountable to' the Public. Do . you know whether Lord Melville has attested and returned to the proper Officer the general state trent of •his accounts transmitted to him to attest, c but which, as /appears in the 134th page of the Tenth Report, had not then been returned to the Ae comptant, which prevented the account from being delivered into the Auditor's Office ?---:1-ck Lordship has attested and returned the account, and it was detained at the time which the Accomptant men tions; iFom the statement which had been' sent to his Lordship for his' attestation having been found incomplete. Are the drafts drawn upon the Bank from the Navy Pay Office, when paid, returned to the office at stated periods ?....-They. are always returned when the book is balancpd, which ,has 'been generally, though not invariably, once a Month. When returned, are they preserved ?--They have not been preserved, us they are considered to:be of no use when the balance is agreed. During .the 14 years you • were Paymaster, did you receive in all, upon Lord MeliTille's private ac count, to the amount 'of twenty thousand pounds ? .--1 certainly have. What were thesourees of income in England . of which you described yourself yesterday to'be in the receipt on account of, Lord Melville have, I. believe, uniformly received his salary as Treasurer of the Navy ; but r do not' recollect that any other receipts, which have come into my hands of his Lordship's income Were derived,from any public si tuation, but have been confined to sums which I may Lave received in the management of -his private affairs. What was the largest sum you ever had in your hands of the private account. of Liird MOville at opt time ?--..-That appears perfectly impossible for me to aseerthin, as his private transactions passed through an account current, in which his Lordship was ge nerally indebted to me ; hut at other times the ba lance`was in favoUr of hiS Lordship, hen. I 'neither charged interest - w upon any balance dile by his Lord ship, nor did I charge myself 'with any liltei4St at times When the baLmee may have been in his .Lord ship's fivour. Do you recollea the largest balance in the ac . x . count current that ever appearedln laVetir Of Lent Mel\ iite ?----lii an account comprehending so lung 4 pried it is very difficult fig in to gird an ac- , ear..lte an4wa tco that qutstiou ; but it cortAitily has at some time been as large as between i? 0001. 30001. in Lord Melville'i faVoue.- Do y 61.1 recolleCt the largest balance in the ac: 'count current that ever apt eared in your favour; with the same degree ,of accuracy ?- 7 I do not reL cello& with the same degree of accuracy, but I have upon a former occasion declared it had never e:eceeded froin 10 to '20,0001. Do pill now allude to the •sumS mentioned iii your,evidence before the Commissionet:s of Naval' Inquiry to have been advanced by you ocarionalli to Lord Melville, to the 'sums mentioned by y o u in rent. evidence before this CoMmittee to have beqU advanced to Lord Melville 'through the hands of Mr. Tweedy, Messrs. Drummond; and bthere, or to • Any other sums ?—/ allude to the surds which I had occasionally advanced to Lord Melville, as stated hi the Tenth Report ; but some ofthose occasional ad-, vanceS may have been 'made through the l:ailds br, Mr. Tweedy, Messrs. Drummond; or others; Are the Committee. still to understand that yeti mean the advances of from 1 O to 0.0,0001. as rnen.;. tioned in the Tenth itt.lport, to be distinet and difte:' rent from the advances of 23,0001. made by yoti in the Whole; as stated by you in eVidehco before this Committee, ?—They are still to understhnd Did these different advances all sass through your a'ccount current with. Lord Melville ?-They did not. Distinguish which did and whith did hot cannot do it from )nembry. Have you any dm-nitwits to refer to I have al wady stated that I have itone, and my regret for that ciretirrstance. Why were same, of the advances plAced in the. account current, and others not only - pkteed tht sums in the atoount curry lt of which I knew of the appropriation ; of the tippropriation of the other sums I ,was ignorant. • Do you mean by appropriation that you had the payment 'Of such sums on behalf of Lord Mel ville ?---With iegard to the account current I do. You have stilted to the Committee, in a former part of your evidence, that you did receive interest on some advances made to Lord Melville,, on others none; 'you have to day stated, that in the account current you had neither charged interest to Lord Mel Ville, when the balance in that account appeared in your favour, nor paid it when it appeared in fa vour of his Lordship; on what advances thou did you charge interest ?-1 . alluded to a sum of money which his Lordship directed me to borrow, and for which his Lordship paid a regular interest of 51, per centum. The furthet Eraminat;on.qf Alexander Trotter, 4:sq: taken the 9th rf l rats, i 805. 'Were you the lender of the money'bqrrowed t r Lord Melville,- and tier which he paid an interest I *as'. What was the amount :tee/alien:ion d!,:es E:7,t enable in to state this With accuracy but I bt.ilieve, to the Set of my knowledge, that it Ava:: tacit exoteding from to 23,0001. 1 that'stirr 'repaid ?--It long since': ? ., .-;-I.4'our or nit years. , Was you a&ent for the whole of Lerd income ari.iing from private sources. in England A::farasTl.iiOW Wil3 Were you in rile of the whole tn . any part of .ord Mali lI&s inc.oine - arising • froth pril ate sources' in Scotland ?— , -His Lordship has neade frequent renatances frbin Seotland ;. but I do riot know from what s ou f ces t h ey arose, ' Yon Were not. then 'reguinrly in the ; - eL . vipt'of Lora Ale income aripipg , from private sp•arce;.t iii Seotland ? - •=--f was hot. Do you knoW of tiny instance between Angust 1796, and January 17.0, of . any Navy Bill Or Vic.; tualling becoming dm; and 14• escnted for tent, not having ixen paid wlien presented, Ming to tho wbt of etfeas for the payment of such .Navy :and Vie tualling Bill ?—That certainly is not within my knowledge. .114jist you haye . ktiO‘Vn it from your situ; tion its We Navy Pay. Office, if such an event lia(*aelually happened ?-4 think I must unquestiombly have known it. During that period, in a former part of your deuce, you have stated that you wore in Scotland ; had such a circumstance happened doting yo'ir ab sence in Scotland, would it havel r )etn co-tmuli- sated to you officially,' either by Mr. 'Wilson oi- Mr. Swatlield, 'Cashier of the ViaUgllingsills a Undoubtedly a circumstance . so singular would Imre been communicated tQ me by one or other of those Gentlemen, espeelllhr :15 I do not belioveor recol . • lea that any Knelt circ - sunistanee had occurred during the .whole tithe iveled as Paymaster of the. Na:q. .WIIA is the Ic4est period at my one tune of alisence froth Lint* during the time that yens ryas Paymaster„ during ivinh pwod Mr. Wilseti 'tY.l4 drawing money from the Bank with blank chols signed tiy . you Was absent froth the Pay , °ince, I believe, liet\i'eenthree bud four months iit ~, - --- - • i I.> • 1110 year 1797, upon I hcoeeasion of my marrl.44 la Si othold;' but I have very itelclom been abient froln the office for any veriod of time nearly tipismacLitq, to this. , .' .. , , rmr, Trotter produced releage bttweeh hht and Lord Mavilie,—lteleasit feada Tiii? further Eramin.ation of dliexandt'r rawer, E. &keit-the: 10th (I Al* - 1805. Who drew, releatid between you and Lord Mel ville SVottiswoode, of Sac kydie-street, Solickar. • ' Is he dend?--;l7es.- , \Vho ,cttled t ?----I (la 1....n0v,- if any one.. Who gave ,r . !I. !! t fOf ocetika, from the adviee i,! " ; who' Ivought-nie d ',wed, -without In) particular instra::l: cite. Ociri or did ;r:ly . : place uptnt, t piirtlC Ili Part it ite4 to the givlllg )4.1, strtic, or other u i ..:(.-ept Mr. Sp(attiswc.odo'll (.),„ ;ilfl he nu iriftg - t:l° to prewrc 1 - rchtiiiig to ',lo4:•uuliti I>oLvvec,il 7 1 Y:ot to*, Eq, ' I (ith (+f 141(), , ,.. Youlrivt r.)ur ktvidthicit fro tl,lt: 111 ssioilers ik;,l;-:11 hcluiry, that upo:itll tlecitli of ,Achim ,JC`•~~i<()y pos - ehsiun. EiE soul: • • o f bi t s. prlvate pareil; ail tdose thought neceisary toi , iiio , 7 to sticure ~„ balazTcl ; lialik; any of , bo%•!ii