The Sun. — London, England, 1805-07-26 00:00:00

irw ....•.,-. -.LAW REPORT. CCTURT OF KING'S lIENCII, fucy 25. THOMAS ATKINSON V. WALTER 'SUMPTER. Bith the Plaintiff and Defendant are brokers and auftioneers. This was an :action for Slander. Mr., G.Nanew, for the Plaintiff, said, .that" there was nothing - which had given more satisfatlion since Lordshipin, had presided in that - Court, than die aire.stibnhe bad given tO,Juries on subjeas. of this nature. hi a late cause of "jenant v. Ruffin," (see our Report on Tuesday last) the . damres of 5001. had been given, ,and the present case bore a very near resemblance to that in which the Jury had ex ercised their wisdom and moderation. The Defend ant thought proper to insinuate, that the Plaintiff .was guilty of felony. But this was done covertly. It was said; that a glass or mirror was lost, and that the Plaintiff would have been . accommodated at a great house in . the neighbourhood of Smithfield if had not been thr the good offices of a Mr. Daim- Son, in the saMeline of businesS: ThiS Was not all: The Defendant added, that the Plaintiff. had not cleared some lots at Dawson's, and that in come- 7 (pence he r °Lila be permitted to . buy nothing more at Dawson's sales. When much was alledged to the discredit of any person, if the Whole were not believed, it was thought generally, that there could not be so much smoke without some fire. The subsequent to these calumnies, went to bid at Dawson's sales, when he was taken isideliy the clerk, who Said to him, " A Yeryunpleasptit &cum, stance has happened ' • Mr. Sumpter has - spread some ,disagreeable reports of you, and therefore Mr Daw-;. son cannot permit you to'clear arty lots until you have paid for them." The Learned Counsel rei , marked, this was not the:Maximum but the m nimant of the damage. No man could discern how deeply . that, forked tongue of calumny had penetrated. His Friend (Mr.,.EitsKita) might, in reply, Aeliver Pindaric ode; he might, by his fertile invention, in fluencesfor a moment the imagination of the Jury ; but they would not be permanently dazzled by any brilliant display of his,powers ; they would recollect they were upon their oaths, and bring his clitint to a reckonin Peu c 'dy 'deposed, that the Defendant had said at a sale, bean.° about twelVe persons in the same way of trade, addressing himself: to the 'Plaintiff; " You know yur;:elf, ifithad not been for Dawson; you would have been in Nowgitte." L'he Defendant also said to the Witness, ", Go and tell Atkinson, if he dews not clear his lots away from Dawson's, he will get no_more credit at the sale," Qn his'eross examination, he.said it Was customary for the Brokers attendingat. sales to receiyp. two and six pence; five sltill of s, half-a-guinea, and: sometimes a gninea each, fbr their company, from the Auaioneer. I.le said he did not like to deliVerthe message from the Defendant to the Plaintiff; because be thought it would *ound the sensibility of the latter. Another Withess 'was Called, but the words in the de chuttion not being proved, the Plaintiff' was nomuited. PHILIP AND CHRISTIAN SPLIDT V. WALKER AND SONS. . . - signed by the parties ;" and I calm )t exclude the of of the term Signed, in the St mite." - The Plaintiffi were 11 onsuited. LADBROOKE ANDVPQ. V. O. AND J. MORGAII, The Plaintiffs are Bankers, and the Defendant, -George Morgan, is a Gentleman residing in Bucking. hamslnre : James Morgan is a Dotor in Divinity, his brother. • -This a&ion was for a bond for 12,000]. Oyer of the bond and of the Condition was prayed, and the first plea was non mkt :cram the second, a corrupt agreement between the Defendants and the late Mr. Alderman Newman, whom the. Plaintiffs represented ; and a third, a payment of usurious interest. Mr. DALLAs, for the Plaintiffs, said, he Was great ly astonished at the pleas which appeared on this Record. The Defendants had enjoyed the free use of this large sum of money, to devote to their own purposes, for the term of ten years, and they were now required to return it, by. two Gentlemen, Mr. Tate, a merchant, and Mr. Caswell, of Hertford. shire, to whom the property devolved, in conse ,. quence of their intermarriage with, the daughters of - Mr. Newman. Instead of conforming to thecondi. (ion of the bond, Messrs. Morgan thought proper to resist the dbmand, in a way, he thought, not very honourable to their charaaer: He Was provided with their letters, professing their willingness to dis. charge the engagement-, but pleading a temporary disability. 'The Learned Counsel would, however, decline any.s'everity of observation, until it should be rendered necessary by the mode-in which the de timee was conduEted. , After the bond had been proved by I.Vr. Michael Panther, . _ TheiSol,iderOa-GENAL addressed his Lordship and the Jury on behalf of the Defendants, He . as• serted,,that they had been very harshly treated, in bei i ng _required to raise so, large a sum as. 12,0001. on a short notice of six months. It was true, that his -clients had had the use of the money ; but a noble' estate Constinited the ample security of the bond ; • and.it would appear, in evidence, that not only the, legal interest, but something more than. the legal in terest, had been paid tar the loan, and the efle6t of this extortion must be fatal to the present Ailion.--L Notwithstanding this advaittage, so honourable were the Defendants, that they did not wish to take ad vantage of this circurtistance to 'defeat the claim of the.POintiffs : all they wanted was, an interval of twelve months from the present time to raise the money, aft:l7 which the whole account should be faithttilly discharged. As this proposal was not accepted, it became hiM,. as Couhsel for Messrs. Morgan, to chew in eVidetice, that the plea olusury on the Record was Well Ibunded.. The money was to be advanted by Mr. Alderman Newman on the security alluded to, in the month of March 17c95. It so happened, that the title to the estates con!d not • be. substantiated according to the 'forms prescribed by Jaw until - June of the, same year. The Al derman' had agreed, that Whatever difficulty might arise abr.ut the title, the• interest should be es, timated from March, and hence - an - excess Of in tereSt4as paid from the toth of March to the 28th of June, amounting to a surcharge of 1741. above the legal interest. This had been ' paid ; and this alone furnished a competent ground of defence. The Defezidants saw the inconvenience, and desired Mr.Newman' tu invest in Exchequer Bills the amount of the Loan, until the title-deeds could be prepared; but he, had not only &dined doing this, but invest ing. it in any other form, Or:depositing it in the .Bank or elsewhere, in a mannor that could be denominated an ascription of the, money to the purposes of this loan. The faEt wars, that he had -been somewhat too mercenary in the transa6tien ; he had -applied a considerable portion to the purchase of India BOnc4i, and thus had illegally obtained double in terest for the same thoriey After this explanation, the SOLICITOR-Gl.tisiEßAL 'repeated his proposal for the full payment in twelve months, which was immediately accepted.-4 Yer do teas takenjbr the, Plaintiffs, ty consent, in ale sum. V 12,00,0/. and the costs in rite Courts'of Law and Eqiiity were refiyred to Mr. TorriNo. TheCause'of Lubbock y. Clagget was postponed, • The Plaintiffs are 11emp Merchimts, in Cable street ; the Defendants are Rtittsia. Merchants and Sack-makers. This Action was upon a contra& for about twenty tons of hemp, at per ton, which 'were stated to babe been bought by the l)cferrdants, but they not itafilling their contra& the goods were re-sold at :doss of 14.41: I.os. I id. and of interest, • 171. 11 • r 1 amounting to . sum; taerbfore,. of 14s. 4d ; was depending upon this cause. Mc. Easic4Nt;', for the Plaintiffs, observed, that on the t sth of Otlober, .1 Hoa, Mr: : Hugh Atkins,. a iro ker in the Russian trade, applied to them to lokurphase hemp ibr account of the Defendants, and, after some altercation, the price Wit'S agreed at W2l. per ton. The negotiation hung ctirited on !Change, .the ,Broker did not at that timedeliver a Contra(t, and his• Lord-, *hip had very lately ruled, in the Case of Farmer v. Robinson, on a •.'.oiltrtia for•Britmvone, flak un til a memorandum it) writing was 111:tde, the author rity given, to the Paroker by the buyer ,or seller might, be. re-called, because the trama.E*l3, above a certain small amount, would be ranged under those prohibited, by' the Statche of. Frauds. 'Fortunately the present comma would not devolve within that class ; for the Broker had made an: entry . , in his . boas of - the pnrcbasehy the Defendants of the Phil : Thai , 5 after Which, jhe Learned Judge, he trm-t -i..;a, would admit that it could be neither .cotinter matutedby 0411 nor by the other. His Lordship had further ruled, that there might be a suppletory, cod trati which Was not, within the Statute ; that is„ tuft, place, and circutuarinces, , might be tdded to a contnid, as f i t as'thee sliould - be cohducive . to; and consistent with, die Original engagement • ,i)ut a contra& could not in the same. way be made ttb.. Statue, which Was beforel condition:a. :Ho under stood it WA to I)e' said. that the article was deficient , in quality, 'lids difneulty, in point of fa&t, he should be able to remove \vitt). as much success as the jeftion in point Of law. • Mr.tfugh AiLius deposed to the time and other of the c.antrn!ft and, on his ni, lit admitted thAalthough he had made an (. 11 5,6, in his liiiVnot. sent a broker's eon - tra& itt the cwitomary form, either to the Phtintiffs or Defendants, Mr. U tin o u Albirlitted to Ilia Lordship, that the memorandum in the aecounthook. Of the witness was not Such as the Statute of Francis my :tired to constitute a valid contra .l:;- The exprk!ii %Verdi of the Suttute were these, " to be Made .ind signed by the parties." The contraet must, therefore, be sign ed either by ti:e parties, or by seine other -person, Li folly aitt! , orised. This private entry of iNlr. At kins was thi.i.her signed by himself.nor tins' person. Mr. East; When a,Broker has a regular authority to purchase, and lie makes a memorandum of it, with 11 . 1 Otitis hand, , 4lns own books, it will satisfy the Statute of Frauds. On the principle. to , which I now advert,: a will, in the hand-writing of • the test rtor, without-being stgued, is allowed to be valid both in law and equity." , . lord lf the Learned Conn= sel for the Flaintiffs can produce any case wherein this doctrine has been adopted in commercial con traets, I wiii endemour to giVe it its due weight ; Lt the words of. the A& are, " to be made and 'on account of the' absence of Sir James -Sadmarcz. &fence, disthetly itaied, that Ie was ady, bra Cle part of, his Client, torefer the bus tress to any'o'y of the jury; or. airy Gentleman at. the Bar, •arid - tb , abide hy . their decieion; and not take up the thrice of' ,the_ Court any farther.. This . proposal was rejedea on the part of the Plaintiff; who refuSed to refer the matter, unless ,the Defendants Would agree to eve. This Officer had obtained leave from the Admiral in Command, and from the 'Board, to quit his sta tion oti Guernsey, in order to attend this Court. His arrival is expeaed on. Saturday,, for which day the Cause is-entered. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GutLunn L. SITTINGS AT NISI PRIUS , BF .FOR SIR jAhigs StANSFIEI•D , up the commission "they had made, as Grokers, on the - different transaaion9, relating to the disposal of the 15,0001. This befog, withotil he,itation, refits ed by the Detimciants,- Serjcaut SHEPHERD pro ceeded to address the Jury. He said that, as the offer made by him on the part of 'the Defendants had been refused by the Plaintiffs, it became his duty to state the case 'of his Client, and, though he 14eliei',. ed it would be the better way ,to refet l- _the business to some Gentleman of sense and honour, yet he had not.the smallest doubt, from the evidence he had to produce, of obtaining a verdi6t. There was•no evi deuce, he'said, now before the Jury, , to prove that the Defendants received 1 . 5,,0n01. in stock, from the AND A arzolAL JuPY, BIRD V. NITALSII AND NESBIT. This was an a&ion brought by the Plaintiff, to re cover from the Defendants, ernitient , Stock-brokets in the City, 1 5,0001. stated to have been lent to thou in 'Reduced 'Stock. Serjeant- BAYLirt, on the part of the Plaintiff; stated; that the Defendants had been employed as' Brokers. for the Plaintiff' a contiderable time back, . and that on account of a great intimacy Which sub sist&l between them,' the amount of Stack stated in , the Declaration had been lent, which when' dis (ally proved by an acknowledgment signed by the Defendants, with other strong evidence to corro borate ;it,, he had no doubt would so iM press d i d minds of the Jury as to induce them to give a ver di& for his Client. The Note, or MemorandUrn, signed by the Defendants, and bearing date the of April, 180 j. WIN then proved, and put in, It stated Simply, that the Defendants were indebted to Mr. Bird .; 540001. Reduced. The gerk in the R:ank then proved the transfer of the 15,6001. made at that time, 'and that the Plaintiff itppeared from the BankßoOka to be on that' day possessed of 26,0001. in real Stock. 'which had been, written to the Defend ants, was then read in evidence ; it was dated 24th 01.Tarinary, t 805, and demanded the payment of the I 5 ,000 L; the, contents of this not being complied with, the Athon was commenced,: The Phaintiffhav ing dosed his case here ; Seii2Llnt Stici?ittotn, on the part of ,the Defend ants, submitted that the Plaintiffs sliould be nonsuit ed, as the evidenee did not support the, Declaration; but Counsel being hear,d 'on both sides, Sir JAMES MAN svi cm) was Of opinion that the, third count 'Nvas stffieiently supported to let the ease go to the Jury. Serjeant EPHLIID then, before he entered can the Plaintiff; far the; purpose' Of replacing it. .He cer tainly alloWed' that they received so much stock, but they received it for the . .purpose of employing it for the use of. the Plaintiff; this they did ; and the ac count on the :face of their - books, which he would prodnce; would appear to . thts.Jury to be perfectly correct. ; He - would' be able to prove, in .the most. satistaaory manner, that the Plaintiff had been se veral: times. at . the 'counting-house of the De fendants; and had as often looked over the books, and. examined into , the accounts between , him and the Defendants, without making the slightest 'objection to any item which related to the bay ing or • selling of stock. On the : contrary, -he would prove, what appeared to him to be a dire&. acknowledgment of the fairness of the accOunt, that the Plaintiff had been ono 'day examining into the accounts,' for • a considerable time, and seeing that the Defendants had debited' themselves for a small sum for jewellery, got troin him, . he desired that that item should be taken out,' and that the Defend ants should pay him in . cash, instead of putting it in the stock account; which was accordingly, done. The Learned Serjeavt dwelt with 'great emphasison this particular, :which, to.his mind, he said, was a . plain admission that the remainder of the account was correCt.. Itwas a tad worthy of the greatest attention, that this account .had been closeds2 years and a half, without thef Plaintiff making the slightest objeetim.i until'the present time,, when, finding that it was' ne, cessary hp .shonld pay the : balance against ,hitn, , he picked out this one item in the l.account, on which he .conceived, in point of- lay.i, he COuld - succeed, and thus endeavoured to pick the. pockets of his clients of this large suns ofdrtioney, for the purpose of re ,imbursing himself for. the money he,hadlost in his speculations. However, if by any chance the plain tiff should obtain'a verdict, which he, tor : his part, could not for a moment think possible, _he, wont& it is true, get his Money ; but as:to his character, , he certainly must be a loser, and under thesecircum stanceS,, his greatest enemiesmight congratulate him. He. their obserVed, that :s;Vhen this auction - was com menced, the Defendants . had callt4 for a bill of parti culars, and in that:Which had been furnished by the Plaintiff, the entire debit side of the account had been given, amounting to a sum of 10(40001. and not taken into consideration any items at tli4 credit side; he was very sure that' the Plaintiff wonld,,iflie - Wukis recover all this ; . but he was rejoiced that the same law aliti the same justice, whichprevenhed . him front succeeding 'in this palpably unjust 'demand, might also interpose, and prevent 'him from succeeding in a more dangerous, because a more subtle;piece of in justice.. The Learned Serjeant then made some-ob servations o'n the - proposals Which had , been made by the Counsel for the Plaintiff, and concluded by say ing, that; when the evidence was gone:through, he would allow the case, to go to the Jury, with perfea contidence that they would do justice, and in doing .that, would give a vei did to his client - Mr. Henry Sherer, clerk to the Defendants,' proved the Plaintiff's hand-Writing, in a •debit and credit ac count b r etween him and the Defenclanta, . ending the , 20th of April 1802. This was put in for the:pur , pose of skewing that there were Stock transadions to a large amount between the Plaintiff and the Defendants up to that time.' this account included a 1 sum of 10,0001. but not .the 1,5,0001:and was Set- , fled,' without any question on the part of the Plain tiff as to the Defendants transacting business tut him. A. lettet'of the Plaintiff's to' the DeteLdants . :was also proved, in ,Which he _requested the loan of i 0001— and desired that it should not be. put . in the ' Stock account: The draft of the Defendants for sQ much was also proved. . ' . The Defendants having closed their case; ' The Ledger of the Defendants was then prOdUced, from Which it appeared that the account between the Plaintiff and the Defendants closed on the debit side, on the 22d of January; '180,3, 'and on the credit side, on the 21 - st of February, 1903, and that there . was a balance of six Imndred and odd pout* in fa- your of the Defendants.. The witness farther said, that the' Plaintiff had often looked over - the ledger in -his presence, and taken particUlar notice of the itims; and . never had made an objection to - aw,, except to t;,vo for the' articles of jewellery, which, he said, he should receive,cash for, and did accordingly. r.l'he witness • then underwent a very *Mg cross-examination I,y Serjeant 4A . Yi.g, but nothing material appeared. f ' ' Sir jAmys MA's:lOlE6 Said, :it would . be .much: better to refer the business to some Gentlemen of sense, and -they might-then have an Opportunity of xamining the parties on oath.. • . Counsel for the Defendants immediately agreed to a reference, but the Plaintiff's Connsel would not. Upon - the consultation between • the Counsel, Ser jeant Ban. (retained for the Plaintiff) was for agreeing to the reference, WldCh was oppoSed by Serjeant - BiiyLEY ; on which, Serjeant BEST said, 'the other might go on, but he would not. ' . , r . ,Serjeant 1.1/YLEY then spoke to evidence at. COn , Siderable length,. urging strongly, that the acknoW ledgment -of the 45,0001. given by the D fendarits, would not have remained ►in the Plaintes hands ifit referred to any particular ' transaCtion, and de clueing, as a necessary consequence; that the origi nal intent was, to let it remain with the Plaintiff, as a Security for hiS property. ' Hi then went through the various - points of the case s and concinded_by saying, that it way his wish to refer it to arbitration, if the CounSel 'for . the Defendants had agreed to • pito' ~..u6vena, 4 4 1.01 , 1D0N .: ; I'rinivd.by,R I (=HARI) HARRIS, of No, 4, Martlett-cpUrt,.lloW73treet ; and PubllSl:d by Wi.t.l AAM ' srAGZ Staid) Moltell.Sfeet,,,4%.i.,,.eti. ig LUC SUN-01;1'4CE, No, 111%j Strat4d ; where AA ertisemenis ardeis for.the P aper , Leiters for thefditor, ezc, (stost-tail.), must . . . . ins p:-opusgi ~A,,,hi,h vc .t 4 .5, to I.crit3AO.tli Pra'Lr,tii the c ).-oinissiOns on ,tiltlosing ;.iccounts, on Oich - condi: is he wwld gi , ie op his claim to the I 5,0001. Sir JA:g rs MAN,SFIELD, f,t-Ler triAitiOnotho in- effeetual- effort' have the matter refenA, ob.; serveri to the. Jurr, that as ,the Counsel coold Pt agree - among 'themselves, they must determine ia a u t:t a e i r i a the tl) e t the best manner they could. - 'This' aEtion, he ai4, b b ee nd - n bi l t d c e odiuurminegnced- in 1 80idupwaircis of two years rP3:7l:ll::liii:attilliatC")k phiCe, 110 darlialld bVi..l4 of two years. It; had been tt.:terniined, tlLit if a (til:aitiet.isiiielep,tsooiithiattiov!ibtabices.peeridi,e)d -man pays the difference dile by his lags in a stock: transaaion, he Cannot r,!cover it back-again; 90 ii, appeared to him there was very little diilCfCliCe b, tween . a man looking over his ace(iunt, and ina oil. tier approving; of it, as paid by - his broler, awl-ry -log it himself; but they were to ton, wheilitr he did approve of Alle :lockout of the ledier or nut% Ilis L o rdship then \vent into an el‘pltiaon of the law relative, to the evidence on the part,of tile Plaia- AK,- giv'en in -support of the counts in his 1e ,lira of tion. The. letter groin the. Plaintiif,to the' Deict i " ants , reiitiestjng the loan of 14)001. !-.lic,,vc(l, that thew whichNstlol(ll4llgir:reii),llotaiulidtrigeitaibiltiegO:joofon(eo Irletiadseotilie 0, i 1) ,1. Lt t t 1 11 S: Z:. i l 1 1 0 t t e l 1 e a it!. k a l r i L o i e \‘,.. : led,ging the receipt of fifteen thottoaa paaPd 3 B' of the Defelltiftll6; inipekion of the account, as: pelt it bevon,a,3 d11,',. havetl i i e I)c,l'aitil:ii'c:Y‘i°Nl-‘t-e.'d'i‘,ll)t:ll)lr)POl3v elltil:cil;ct:ll!.llle7'rikl thql lii...s intention must have been called ta t)7; case, bt t sat r i litii i ,oliae eottsi r lty e shoni;aceo; 11sra N tzti t nthtiq ' a itoiiti s sit :Ni sufficientlyi sums, and to the 'balance. This ticeou!it 0.% the ,Plaintiff debtor above 6001. ; so, tl???."'„ sbee t e i l • ii i ii i gi n i t tl e oi t o t \tvisivt4wi t4loiceysoetEistisiittill:trine:?ll:i bringing his action ? SiK months transaction took place, he had not been . 6: 111d 0 ,. ) allowed by law for commencing :1 6 ti" t " uf r it• ttshihttiesol)yitithbli:lieuNteb,,,r.es:j_i.t,r.tealileoalatinocielitb:obeise:tvbasabeb3::rrt:vtie°:(l;ii.;:ti.::tri.. 1tii,r11,(0:::,,,,,,,,,,,,,,rt,i3.i.t,.,t,,:i,,,,,i:,iti,;. triturc., However, t h e y were , to t:ll:::titile:c,ltiti::;' I.:1-s into consideration, .and dkerinine on t. ,. g:',,.., far his part he did' not think it . in the sligh.tLslo; gree,creditable to, the Plainti if -to picl‘. o'. t'"' o f . item in the account at this .diStance of tini , ol ), , ,ii i s . bring his aaiori on it, .11s to the Dote notc.ccts . thand it bacl h :, is demanded. by the Defendants when the 3 .c,),, o i were settled, for that before,- and he - 1 - 1 t tl'e Oetco-"" also twig i i Ili° de. might at soon, if not, Sooticr,,lijl e flot,tt,.; 0 (11 0 Plaintiff forgot to_ brit'''. iLfOtrhaesp.thatiCit lie lisi a , ,', iti of two ' •( ' . 1). . ' . 3 ears, 1.,' in reality, the !non ,‘l ; ct e if they Nin. Flis Lordship concluded by 5!„,v2 4 1 0 . ,it , teel were of opillimi that thin accOunt li.lit b ~,,, _: 31 4 to, by the Plaintiff's loog over the le i . fir 3 ast ~. not obje6tiner to the items, they Avo"l',`. h ' ~, t ha;io' 11;ins;dii,,atiroingloitnujit it , t L l : e , dtis?:.;o for the Defelidants ; on the contrgy, 0 ' l ,- c - i f e i st , od it was not, and that this note r`> sot i would find. for the Plaintiff. >ttlrf edi • The Jury then retired, but beforq Ille): r o t ', w i') .. ch the parties had entered inw an agrColllll''ol to the _ the DefelldantS evert' to.plfy die stun 01 11 : 1 ,i, i00 , •R,lailititr, together With the.co,ts in this • ' varf iei also in an a6tion peadina betwcen Lb° .311 ' hoti in the Court of King. 's liel,wl). 1 w ith o' ati“ dl.• - Shortly after the Jury came ollt,,ley w erc .. : mentioning what theii,ciecWon, Ava). ", „o'ct,.o ilw . reefed to give a verditi as - zigreed on I) parties. : . : • ' • ~, , . ' . stilt' A h tf's. , , . , c i,telit pou I r , JULY 24. Thrce ',O. . IBnio'Aurtrii:rd—the Fancy. Sc)',, ZtiolV,lilis"ll/riont"4:9eilicty tike' t"itra,7:.itti!)::lll'``)n t e r : ll P ‘ r "ritlV (-1.:17t-tle':Qr.bt•toi;arkCcrituifirec);.in h% vr la.):Ii :terillcYd'i il l fi tt. Saited -is le Agesinria lie IA 'sae, ' y,,,,,q,:111 i 1 1 ,, rhollal Winewav tbi• ii.iv..:, 0 ,11 t N''sl`);'hoilly, ,; c d 0 . , nor, Jac:l:lion, fur SUuderlau ; 11.oiouic"-...iiic:r I '' , ' Cowlter. for 1101 ; zunt-Vitilid''' 'lna • N:1ft1e.L.............................„_.......... * ' Lib: 1 lls lon. ql • she 1 1 , ..,On Wetiiieshy the: , i 4; ii iir.it. ill 11,11.stoct, 1 . , lor'' , I f Barnard, 4)1 a cull-Low culla. 2 t florsq,,w, ii.iot Lstdy, of a ,:liild, in her sid Ye,...3r,,, at r • rs i ° ."; I - e r, aldWal, Aria ::, ,Viti.: 0.1 .10....01' ''' .1 ,;, , 1: - (°ill ti'",,,,.t i ; ' IF Slit !LIS teed 13 ciiiqii-en St: ,kris vv. l, ' 1 " . `" -d r ugnt "'" ' a ' o f her age, aiici in l ' ile la s t ,-.-!veii ye.us Pi b 0 r. ~ 110 issue. li.o:::::sLit:lidil.2)..F., dt!zitia:be:tlll3;il; l e g ' c L. railk'il'i:tal i.l.t..:1.1::(1.:-°1'fil:11:1"(1;1: . 61''' ,i ' : MARVA') • . ~,',.. D . uhl:t„ Sir 111". II sPci'l li'c'''e' 'llart. t„ tio , law D uk e of Lcinstcr. • ' ' . . s - 1330kr , EA, ,;s0 "awsfatet to Miss licwicke only dlliP"'t t - lanhant. Peter 13lackbuttlet 11,1,1 C YZtly llovicit. I': I_, ."-- -------22---t----1. - —...------4----'"-- . ' , , Lately, the 401..),Rtohiagnnril2pll. Sir lohnittVii)ll„n, .oft, ai'd.._:,...„.„.„.„3 '1411: ----r, '' • . . , s e pt• ,), i l l • isto;-19,' Arundel,stiee t, i,),1 A il 0 A F°.,R- V(l4.ls•tai..YearS 1 .11.3.8%...e1itieni:1160,,,,i14 r rite:lice loc. the Treatment of.Venerea I L01,1,,!,,,,i the cure of tiro deficiancie*,,,Witich are the cot& ,t i, a destruCtiie habit. • The undoubted qoalifications. which 1 irvi)iesr77iiis',:ti,4.ol; bee of the Royal College of Surgeos. .11-.)„,9e 41 tit!' / l iir o the Army, and the extent 'of my, expecte r.,..,. vo,„/ linii cohstitute my claim to that ttlp:lll,.°looit rerliTift be "attaincd by .the illiterate, or ev 0 b.Y til`.,,,i py Attatily Aencrat Is raCtitloher , whose m ild is li.Lroo,— • , ~ an ilitrriense variety of Disorders. • ind pv,billild, The vety iittgular complaints of Viscaosect, .....10041 4, which fro -very rut of the World lI % ~ut',,,,,ortt' .It 4. , „,,,,fe !TAW aft COOSidera ly con,tuced ,to eny l' , , i 0 9 Sioll Of Ilie tnost cknPlicated CaSes, ~ t• 311 UllgtOraV I f Piscases are trout the intliscrellu!ir mem, and if such CASeS Of. LiOtroltil'.i!'.ijorrtial;ll:l'l'fi:44l exist, as those which arc the Conseti„: ,I;:,:treor olit.,l,.roir vice, ran any MO ilSitimc a better tititc,,l,„ ter t i 1 ,, Lilo , a regular Surgeon, resigning all otltercireiLlw.7 o t $ rnent of 111,25 e, and concenttating ►tits .ti 'l' . Id ft r . this particular point ? still io.l pAngert ''i tt , • In recent Cases 'of rnfeelion, al. .. 40,3,i0,,, tress May' be avoided, and in tit it i s 1)1.04,t14 leirosti . i We.iltes much AMIN iniztery 111,411:,1 to and st. . , rrurans of ranimation A Wirt r e ' t°l4 1 „ 0 1 ' r OW ``-'eli. thc Constitution.- , le,,iiiilteot.. e egjte,v, Throngh inconsiticrate neglect t . .x..,,i,,, 0 ~ :imintirif;Ttitci tt)4')lt;vel'a iltll:,:ti.e.Cltll:l'l.l,4•C'flito:'l":')l"lc' °.'rel)in :pc.6:: w ken other et..tctiriottera ltavc i-01‘1.1:,:ociy stit . ,; J o; 6 0 ' 'rhe terms of rCtlitillerltl9ll jr , C 1',.:.1 uorciti .4 + 1 ntervirvv, but no letters arc attoo(-4. inclosed. Memb of the Ri;iti‘ti!:l,:tlr.4:lllt,,telr'',,'ooics_Li.,ll,rl:l7::::,,,,4 No. 19, Arundri-,treer, Straii,i, it enr0.0.4 _r~ .. _~ .~~~~