The Sun. — London, England, 1805-06-07 00:00:00

r 1114 P ER 14 L PAR I_, I/. • /MUST OF PEERS, TEUIZSDAY, JUNE 6. Linghem'S Marco Till, and Weston'S Divorce Bill, were Tea& a secend. time.-e-Moereg Divorce Bill was ordered to be Teed a second time bextweek. • • • ete. itisTicE, FOX. , • Upon the Order of the Day being moved for their :Lordships to resume the examination of witnesses relatke tothe Charges preferred against. the Hon e Mie Justice Fox, the Learned and -Venerelale Judge:vas called in, and.Jelr. Rom e e re-cOmmenced the exa. mination of Mr. Armstrong, the Foreman of the Petty Airy of Ferthanagh, upon whose petition and coM , plaint the present inquiry was instituted. The Wit- ness.wae firet asked, ewhethere.efter_ he had heard the evidence upon theindiEbhent which had giyearise to the COndlla of thel e ekered Jndgc, he could consci entiously have found any of the Prisoners guilty ?, Mr. Adam objeaed to. thi,e enestioti as too general,. and,it was waived. me Witness, on being cross examined by Mr. Adam, stated, that .theetrial in question took place on the. a 9th of August, • t 8.00 tii4.additiOnal evidence woe gone into after the Jury had been changed ; that the WitnesS, as the Foreman, delis ered the verd ofacquit tal 'teeing beefi Out Zibout half atthour. On the , f,2ptli of Aughst, the day after the 1;41, Mr. Justice Fox desired;the Clerk of the (;,rayon to deliver to him a list of the,.Peity jurors. When he leidreceiVe'd the. list be desired: the Grand Jury to be called, and . he stigmatised the . Petty Jury • es unworthy of being believed ore Oath, ' and unfit to act in the capacity of Jurors, He itl4a prdereel the Clerk of tl Crown to deliver the list to es.'ery suc-• ceeding'Jndge ' e as consisting of me unfit to aEt as Jurors ; also that theHigh,and Under Sheriffs should have lists 'delivered to them, ,in order that it might be known the Jurors were branded with infamy by the verdi6t they had given, and furthee, that their names should be posted up 'in the Grand Jury Room. , The Witnetis stated, that ,he had been, examined this sUbjed below a Committee of. the Hotise of Lords. He added, : that shortly after the circum stance to which he Was deposing; he and his brother Jurymen, applied to,, Counsel for advice, Upon be . ing asked, wheelie first MSC' the-present Petition; he said it was as long' after the trial, 115' the summer of 1804 ; one of the Jhry brought it to him for hiS sig . nature. He belie' ed the name of this Juror was Fawcett. ~ He admitted, that in the part of Ireland is which he•and the rest,of the Jury resided, though they did riot receive the newspapers, they had means of knowing what paised in Parliament. - He-knew, befbre he signed the Petition, ehat a complaint had been made in the House against • Mr. Justice Fox. He said Fawcett and Weir brought the -Petition to him ; more of the . Jury were present .at the time., It was at the house of Mr.' Reid, an 'lnn-keeper ; they met hi .4 parlour ,of the inn. He 'did not know who drew up the .Petition.' Mi e ßoeueev subMitted, that the Counsel foe the Learned .Judge had no right to press this c o urse of inquiry. - , . Mr. ADAM cOntended, that as the Jniy, by pre , ferri rig. a joint complaint against the Learned' Judge, were nhited Plaintiff's in the same cause, what ever any of them had done or said was capable of being proved, aiid Was eqnally applicable to all. Lriid ELLENIiOROUOII said, there could be no ytest ion with regerd bi the competency of the evi, thrice. Li all prosecutions carried on iu Criminal Courts it wits ttie ordinary and constant course to egliniine . into the motives by which the Presecu ork.were .aaiiiited. if it .appear 4 .that they held .)rivitte astieniblies, and consulted secretly., together,. it wait a most e pregnant and important fat% in the consideration ot the charge, as it might indicate the motives the Proseeutare had in view,. Not only the assenibly or rneetinglof the Proseeutore, was an material to be proved,' but the declarations of any of them accompanying such ad, were important, The oteedion to the evideece, therefore, would not bear an argument. The Witness proceeded to state, that he did not kneve who drew up the Petition ' or who gave in-. stmu tiotis for it. They employed an Attorney, who sometimes lived in Dublin, and sometimes in Fee . managh. „ This Attorney was the father of one of the jurors. The Witness was asked, whether, he had ' given the same kind of evidence before the Commit tee of the House of LordSe . Lord HeWeesee LlU,Rigilt . it, irregular to refer to the evidence giVen -before the Committee.: The Doat of Ceeatece intimated; that, as the question , had been objected `to by a',Noble Lord; it would be proper for the Learned Cohnsel to with draw, it. Mr. AILOA contended, that he hada eight to ask the question ' in oi.ler to compere the evidence given., by. the Witness now with that wbich had been given before. It was a course, of eeiimihation which went to lie credit of the \Virile:33's teStirnony. ;rye there tole thought, with submission, that their Lacciships would allow him to proceed. Mr. NOLAN supported hi 4 arguments. Mr, Reeeieve s heard oh ehe other side. Thd LORD PIANCELLOq said th L ord V‘, t• • - ships were ;called. u?on . by tin Counsel for the l,,,, , earried Judge to eireet that to be' done which they,had paid shottl4 not he ( .16Ae. Their Lord- shpts had /yelped to communicate the evidence taken befote the Corrnnitt;:e, and yet they were desired to suffer Co:tinsel - to ask , ttliestiorie.whieh would oblige the,'Witness to repeat 'his ..evidence • overagain. Lord,AMV7 IO observed, that he was net aware their Lordships had evertornelo arty such deeisiere He did not knovi they hid ever passed any vote u )on the subjeet. He certainly recoile4ted a Noble I s moving a question' of the kind, but their Lordships ecejoemett without' agree inee to it. _lt was b ro ught on again, but no r e s o lu tion was adopted,. Ho eras of opinion that it was it question which r further deliberation ;it was,,importapt to substantial justice tnat it should be re-considered ; net to do so would, he conceived, be a . sacrifice of i to tico to, forros, The • enly ground of argernent for m e eeng publish the evidence before the ComMittee was, that it .was.a- Secret Commit Committee tee. Why was - it, called 4 Secret • , Sur he was, it dia not hear 1114 charade'.; .nor • leas theme in its proceedings, arty circurnStence (rem .which it COW, - with . propriety, have been SO ti: lOMitifittd; Jig WO far e eecret, diet out ot not to publish the evidence. before their Lordrhips had detertnineA.upon tile Inquiry at their' liar ; but 'the .ships for :;cerecy' teased the moment .their Lce.shitis NA . 'ere of ppinioil there ought to be A public investigation. -wrts a proceeding con neEted with tbz adniiniStration of public justice, thechariEter of publicity naturally attached to it. He hoped therefore that House - Would,deliberate on the. propriety of publishing. the proceedings of 'the Committee. It 1%74' obvious that it it was not Intb: Hied, the Learm,i Judge • would have to defend himself at a very great disadvantage ; while, on the Other hand, every advantage would he afforded to the Petitioners : while the evidence was kept se- Oet, it was difficult even to know who the Peti tioners ,were, or whether it was the cause of the Petitioner's themselves, :or'of other parties. lie ah, particularly. to a NObleMirqtais who was an accuser upon this. occasion. Their Lordships could not but he sensible that 'the accusers and the ae- cused did not stand on equal grounds,, because the former were acquainted with 'the whole of the evidence given before the Committee, while the latter was entirely ignorant of it. Their Lordships too were placed -in an embarrassing and delicate sitmtion, from which nothing but the publication of the evidence could relieve them; they had the evidence, but irshould he recolleded that it Was given ex, parte ; it was the evidence of the accusers who consequently had never been cross-examined. Their Lordships came to the, investigation with that impression which three weeks evidence, not cross examined, was calculated to produce. The objec tion in this case was not of the same force a.; in ordinary cases, for ,though the evidence given be.. fore a Grand Jury was fX, park, they did not cAu inunicate it to the Petty Jury who tried their Lordships, as Grand July, first. heard 'the.ex phrle evidence, and then, with that previous impression, proceeded to try the accused. This he conceived wrong,. and therefore he hoped their Lordships would take the subjea- into their serious Conside- ration. - • Lord SIDMOUTItsaid; the House was . at li berty to deliberate again on the subje&of the.NOTale Lord's eech, as 'no, formal decision had taken sp place. had understood that a general admission had been made, as to ,the difficulty of publishing' the evidence, not .arising 'merely on . the point , of form, but other obstacles . which stood in the. %Tray. He was however of opinion, that an adherence to forms would ultimately= be attended with intik' sub stantial justice. The eVidence before the Com mittee had been .taken in order . to enable their LordshipS to judge of the propriety of pursuing the inquiry. . It was now proposo to use that evidence fora different purpoze., - ..As to the . eireutostance of the Learned 4t,dge , h ing, ignov.int of. facts known to the Petitioners, it was an inconvenience to which every person accused wns subjea. was of opinion that there was tiOt - sufficient ground to induce their • Lordships to publish - the evidence. • ' ' • , LOrd CARLISLE Observed, that the evidence on the Inquiry : beihre the Committee ought to !be as . , public ;as the Sun at, noon-day.. Why were Short hand m.:riters employed to take down the; evidence,. if it was aftermkni to be' kept a profound 14.0 was of opinion that t beir'l,OrdshiPS', in j , Astice to 'the Learned and respeaable.: Magistrate at the Bar, ought to allow hini the •bnefito' Counsel having, the whole of the evidence before them. The Earl of iItTCKIGII4NISLUAR onsiderca the : . Publication . of evidence, so entirely ex park as, that taken before the , Corrunittee, to be extremely im proper. Earl Si'l',NC,Ett urged the measure of furnishingtho . Learned Judge at the Bar s.with a Copy of the evi.. dence taken before the, former Committee. He also thought, that the pref:ent evidence nhould be printed for the use of the tiou6e, Lord V A WKI , ,ShI!RY bad no of jeaion to the: evidence: no‘xr going on. being . made public. was not, like, that befcq*e the thrther CoMmittee, . Merely an eLaniinition in chief. The WitnesseS at the liar were . snbjea to 'weross-examination; and therefore theirevidence would git; to the world with all the cohairing the parties an either side could give to it! Ti.e LORD CIMATCELLOR stated, that it was absolutely necessary their Lordships should, come to' some deciitim can the sub) et under 'con4deration but it was his opinion, tlit in the mean time the question proposed by the•Cotmsel should not be put. If the Learned Counsel were permitted to Put such que4tions, it WU evident, that, with his active mind, he would easily draw from the Witnesses every thing they had stated in' the former Cornmittee. .In or der to enable their Lordships to ,ciaine to a decision on the main question, it was necessary that some Noble Lord should make a 'Motion on the .subjea, - , • it , and he felt very difficult to forin an ' opinion as to wilat the purport of that nation should be. — It had-been proposed on a former occasion to re.. wive the Committee, and 'whether that was :the mo d e , N hicir ought now to be taken, ,hedid not pre ~trend to decide. He reminded their Lordships, how liier, that in coming In a decision on this . case, they • wOule.l establish a prectdent which would apply to all ca ., ( . g e n e r aily Every word of the evidence taken before, the Committee might ll'ave tedoimded to the honour arid credit of Mr. Justice Fox ; but in making this supposition, ,their Lordships were aware. .that the rule of ftirnishin evidence might be ap 7 plied to cases of a very different nature.. L or a E LL zgi- 3 0:t oi;G it agveed with the .No and Learned Lord, that, the queAtion !:nould not 110 W be, put; hilt lit' WiVi of 01)1111011, ll la t, iltlie:iti the.forms ' of the House precluded stich question:;, the general b w o f vv id 6nce ati m or ised the Conn.iel to pat them. lie thought that the Committee had already come to it decihion on the que:ition of furakhing .a copy of the evidence ; but, is that was not the CifiC, he hoped they wo,uld.detenaine it without further de lay. ' • . , Lord I\llNTo , obser...6l,' that the propriety of tor . nishiur', it - copy Of the evidence . hetbre the thriller Committee,: And - the right of the Counsel to put su-I. que.4tioll,4 ai that noNV- under con , ,ideration, forined, 'lll ill:, opinion, tWO separate points, of t ii i ,.. cusgiou. • fle ' now 'moved, tilat the 4,2'11;1 irioi-in do i letivQi the Chair; and g:e.e notice, that he. woitid to-morr OW Mtho `,l I.‘lotiou for renewing the Conner Committee. ' -.- ,- ' A 'tier stunt convey.,ation this Motion v•q,ls ag wed to, The .1 C;-1A NC EL. 1.0 R IlaVillg tAken the ‘yeol i' . ' ' k 't comTro,:t ion arwe on the (torn of t he_ Motion. °3.l,,ord,'HAv,',K-r- BURY WaS Of opinion, that the oh -1 !_..f... ~.e....,..;..;,,,,' Ow tomtuittee bhould lit: expresred • in .the Moti NOlether it was to be. for la3lpg the eviatince on the Table, or communicating it to the Learned - Judge. If it WAS produced at all he thought it should be priqed. Lord Et:LENDC RQU' it suggested, that e evidei • ) ) • e should lie on the. Table for the inspeaion - and refer ence of the Counsel on both sides. Lord ..Mit,:TO, was at present inelined to make the procluetiop:of the . evidence,..and the future - applica tion of it:, the ground of two separate Motions, The Earl of CARLISLE gave notice, that to-mOrrow, presenta Petition from Mr. Justice Fox, .praying; that the evidence taken betbre the .former Committee might be printed. - •Oil the 'Motion of Lord Au o K Nri, the evidence hitherto taken at the Bar of the House was ordered to 'be printed.-- , Adjoutned. • • • • .. • HOUSE OF COMMOArS. THURSDAY, JUNE 6. Sir LAWRENCE PARSONS was sworn,_ and tOok his. seat, on his re-eleaion, after accepting- th; Office of one of the Commissioners of ,the Treasury in Ire land. • ' • Mr. BROOXE presented Petitions from 39,000 Clethieti of the County of York ; and from the Clothiers of Somerset, Glouceiter, and Wilts, in favour of the Bill relating to their trade now before the House. Mr. BitoottE observed, that the con tests now existing had lasted for three years. What he,wished was an equitable arrangement between Masters and Workmen ; he wished the law to be reduced to a. compendious system, so that- the Mas ters and Work Men may - he atx)e . to understand it, Mr. H. LASCELLES th.ouglit the present perioti of the Session too late for introducing a Bill of such magnitude . ; he thought' arrangement necessary, and the subjed of sufficient magnitude to engage the at tention of GOvernMent. Sir R. BUXTON and Admiral TIBIIKELEY spoke to the same cite& ; the latter obje6ted to the Bill, as put ting a stop to the use of all machinery.---The Peti tions were ordered to lie on the Table. • On the Motion of Sir C. PRICE; the Report of the Committee on the Bill for the Completion of the Idondon Pocks was ordered to be re-committed to a Committee of the whole House. On the Motion of Mr. TIURNE,Y, the further con sideration of the Report of the Committee on the Camberwell Water Works was put WI till Monday.On the Motion of . Mr. BAXZR, the BID for fle plating Contra&s relating to the Poor was re-com mitted. Some amendments were made in the Com mittee, and the Report ordered to be received to- morrow. Mr. BROOKE moved that the Bill for regulating the Woollen Manufadure be read a second time on Monday , next. Sir loaner Box'rori moved as an amendment, that the Bill be read a second time this day three months: Mr. BaooKE hoped the Hon. Baronet would withdraw his Motion, in order that the , opinions of Gentlemen may ,be colleeted, for the purpose of preparing a of general arrangement against the next Se ion. Mr. H. LASCRIARS wished the Amendment to be v than wit, mith a view to turn the attention of His Yi.ljeity's Government to this subjea, for the pur -1)04 of a . complete arrangement early in the next - Session. Sir R. BUXTOIc consented to withdraw his AmeN, ment. Admiral Br, RK F. LEY consented to put off, the se cond. reading tin .71onday, with a view to ascertain the Sentiments of Government, but With the de termination to niove,,,that it . should:then:be• further put off till that day three months. Mr. CR Envuir movitql , that the Qrder for taking into consideration the Petitions. complaining of an undue Ele6tion in the County of Middiesex be put off from to-morrow till to-Morrow se'nnight.,Ordered. Mr. Hunt issow wished, that, in consideration of the absence of the CitANCEO.OR of theBxcnEmisa, - from . indisposition, the discussion on the . Duke of Athol's claims, with respect to the Isle of Man, should' be put off till to-morrow. After sorne•stab servations from Lord TEMPLE and Mr. CUICtiVEN; as to the length of time this affair had been pending, the further consideratiOn was fixed for te-morrow. On the Motion Of Mr. WittvittEAn, soiree tional Accounts relative to Balances in the hands of the Receiver-General of the were ordered. Mr. WurraßEArt also'moved, that there be laid be fore the House an .:account of the PersonS--M Whose . names the Navy and,Viaualling Bills funded in 110' and i 796 had been written up at the Bank ; but on the suggestion :of. Me; LONG and Mr. RosE, he changed his Motion into a notice forlo-morrow. , • Mr.lloSz.brought up, the. Report of the Corkimit-' tee on the Fish Bounty. .On the Motion of Mt. VAN§ITTTo this Report. wit.B. ordered to be taken into further consideration oh Monday. On the Motion or Mr. Vimirr:r.strir, the Com ' mittce on the Dublin Police Bill was put off .to- . morrow. : It was ordered that the 'House should to morrow resolve itSelt into a Committee, to consider of certain Graint; for Seciet'Services in Ireland, STuitoas L'otiatti•Lbrought up the Loyalty Loan CoMpensationtill, and the -Bill for Completing the Crinan Canal ; which were read a first time, and or dered- to be: id a secend titne to-morrow; alSo the Bill .for defraying the, Chines of Pay and Clothing of the Militia of Great Britain and Ireland, the Bills for IoWaTICS to Sulialtern OffiterS of Militia in Great Britain and Ireland, and the Bill for the better col . le6tion of the.dUty on Paper in Ireland. On. the Motion 411*. Fos.rEtt, the,,House : went into a Committee to - consider of the bet means, for unpros ing the Ilarhotir of Howth, near Dublin.--A stun not exceeding in,6001, Irish, was ordered to be advanced out of the Consolidated Fund of Ireland fir'this . purpose. - -;--411e Report to,,be,-r6Ceired morrow. , . . The Trish Horse and Dog Duty Bill was reported, and onith-ed to be:read a third time on Monday: .• On thr;,Motion of Mr. HusioSsoil, the House \vela hitot Committee on:the Spanish Wine Duty Bill. • ryfr. Ibtooxn wished the adcliti9nal Duty on Sp'e/iill Wine to bo reduced froni 121. to 101. a ton. \ii 1 - 1111 , RIE-,o'l (s , ..ittld not agree to this proposi f.o;), IA-11;..11 gay it... out by Sir C. i 1 o, utif, , ,,ourable to the flit- tracie.r. BROOKE Prop w 6it'ton as negatived, and the duty fix,ed Rt. 121. a ton. The Rvort was ordered to be received_ to-mor-, Iwo a Coininittee on I.iz AB5 re l3l-in g ta Se3s4a e.;:ellOrblitilinhliellY:ggl:C'd4:-tiOnilVittl'a:iti:i':°. s an t C ib t°°' j°eta::ristle:ia'l:::::dese::6lll :i: 1311°:5e°""114t: &tr rl . .' ed lie a elleco•prdo.rtiugNi.cy-as.. br0 .,, 411 , t up, and 3 B ill WIS °r‘'..: .ITA.F.M AN WaS =strutted to -010Ve for lace , •,1 Mr. flosKissoN moved the. Order of the Ply elm' ing into' a Cornthittee o n the l'.. ep . N t of th ittee - on the Coal rrrade. Sir RALru 1111LBANK disapproved of 034 thing ' that tended to diminish the working of the North; ern Collieries.. A diminution - of the Shipping an' Seamen employed in conveying coals coastvAse M..ct f0110w... This trade was the net nurseryof Se•arnel' 2 t n iai n Cl e. e - N th r a C o::: 4:) ,al s il e l a o e :s lga e a d nd g . ed c i o riaittt's,bev,i-nergeapcc•arlicfilarl;;tel for the most arduous services, as tLe best 03ieell 0 I . ; l e l ar cii : ° N . l f 'Hass°ul:3l°).Ktel°:ds°t:lll iota .ttyerd.:lbbit:l.l;tptfilactieliiarigtorLoi.: Judgment whether the procuring alrn° F,,, e ' rtaln • kr tot ' • ply of Coals to London, in this way, il likely '6 0 ,4 • attended with any mischief to the Coasting , li se teci.C t ‘ o ac1741 1oll ote):43 Trade. Sir 14 . 1. W. RIDLEY said, the friends Oftlo44* ing Coal Trade were obliged to accede tO . ww .L l veyance of this limi ted quantity Severer resit , = the fealLrai Government would imp ose ultor them. CO Mr. Bunnox c onsente measur d to go in ld W Igo' ---,,,0, mittee, but w as sure this e I,voti tiblic A pletely inadequate. noll Mt. SPENCER :STANHOPE 110ped ~ s: - sign wo uld take place in the negt SCSSI: 04 die not think the*re would be a disposition toe illo,gets,c,f quantity to be imported in this way, at " 11 i lqs. ed. per ton. ' tong °l_(' Mr. I-Itrsnis SON tnoved, that .50,00,9_ l a. , lowed to be brought by the Canal, paYll„,,,a7cV.' 10s. ..d..per ton, being the duty uow VIP l''' dron on coals brought ccrastways. • In answer to a question from Husitissox stated, that the re:Jsou of 6 31 '4 ° 0 duty in this instuice by the ton was, th 3t `` o ci. brought in this way were too large to be raei, to Sir M, WHITE RIDL. t ho u:, via the tea rricre EY the chaldron. . 10 0" Mr. Hu sitisso's argued for the accnraci° I ciliation. - -• , ~, cl , m ai, Atter some 'further conversation, ll , e ' j og Mr. H d th ltepc Col. NlToll',s,rilifltilif; usatssON was agreed to, 01 •• dered to be received to-morrow., ,iQrict,' On the Motion of Mr. I. I-I. Bitowst, it '`' ii i idio be Ill tr hi the Highlandsof Sc codand should ,• . ed, that the Committee ter making ftoadi. 't• , e 4t l make a further Report to'-rricrrovl. st 4on 0 The Bill for .A.rnendino the ACI of last .• tiftitej . the better Prosecatien ofcbrfenders in th e r e olt I recei'ved to•rnOrrow; Kingdom went ttuough a Committee, ll'e to be that to ~no ;a ssitaloCtill:do. of, His HRo.4lie:.,fmtilrnai.seporns't,g,ea,svfu:srilitlit)Li:ree. P '3 - 1 " 81 1 , ' ". :: -#l i ll' o ti ::,: t :sJ . . , A Message from the Lords •rer:6'", baollir, • Sox N 'STITAET end Sir J A' its' S'rt , Arr , c) ~t , 0 13; , 7 ed before .their Lordships, on iriall4,,`l'a,„l, ',I:A to the conduet of Mr, Justice F . 016 ' 0 1 Airiod 0 1 ' 1 " ' Niessetigerz; were informed, that Ol e ..p. ►0 send an answer ti-y.-Aresserigers:of its 0. , 0rr,,,,y, Mr: Hossctssos gave uottee, ttlar.itt(lb-Plrejtabh4tii; should move for leave to bring . I" ' 1 111 ' t° l Barrack-A , faster General. et' D:l:nr uli css eli rean, ' ing certain itegulations in ' the '• A i s e# The Commissioners of•Talce's s ' l ' ‘ , e d 1 0413 4 cond time, and ordered to be cVs""'' Dill . 1 :1 row.• ; Th Irish Oilice Fees inqual,„ re c ell,' through a Committee, le lteport to [,- of l'' . to-morrow. • 41 gePat 00 :Mt. SLEXAr*DER brought up i.e.l iteolii le ,04. Committee of ENpirin,,o 1,:0r5., , aingly . were agreed to, and Bills ordered accoi jaunted. Altit!__l H MAI Ls. r,,,bot, ,r; fo,,t. 13..._......a_tributgli, r I.ist.Pn, .1 ,1,1_,., i pti 1 ,t,rl;l A tiaLAlOurgli, A tiott4.o 4', C Tti 1 s P01,,t ly4t:f. 0.3.‘t; SI.:1; Os (.0, „o , ~ • 47 gss 1 Oini,itioi - , , 'I: I I , soLi. Q..u_s Pl.;;:t4 FALSV:4 agtAT' LOIC D 0 AV , ! , rf, S S 7) FF.IDA.:, .Itr___,,,,,-"" THE Ilarnturs,h 21,1 ail due an Saatili gt°' Dight , ' ax, thlt 1,41.4 A.civioes nowt Arnsterdarn illfarrti ~,05, g,P2nish Squadron which sailed fr`'sl,.°' w it; 11 ', tilt: 27th Of April met on the nest "4 ,0 14,1.` NELsoNis Fieet tit the sight of NOLO) tP „,,,,(fi'l S• * ) lto CrlP"'d Spaniards took fright, atid returotr‘ re 0, in such haste, that some of their Shipi 0 1 rd in getting ilito the garbour,. , v..' i t ' Live ry e ' 4t A private Letter which ~.: w ith r Gottenburglt; dated the 7th ult. sts' , It 1) , ;' _r.st, peterabii,t, ~,,,,,,,, confidence, that the Court v 1 tti l le. ' ~. lenath -,._ • • Fr • 1 „:, 7 r. entirely prokett wi t h ,' - ~ .05.11)- is determined on in conjunajori''cl'a w i0c,..0,' Sweden. ..wi . ~ ate preetlt '„ Ot e are xilltiOe , tJ" ceejo tV A ' w,heth....er this communication % ,Diiiirip it. ij sWe hope we shall soon he er3blea t° ‘ be eCie Itussi"n -Allu • ' i. -tated shordY t° ) 1,, 1a a 1 14 0 in l'ortierattia. , 1 (,) he l''' of ii Ccingregsi ~,, The old French story - Le•pz/..' Bruisel, is A. letters fr°il/ ' .4eo : , repeateu in , 0- --"'"'"°*-- fit to ‘)j.° lyv 'Ws are this day t,•natle-1 to '-Ti:: i q Coo' p, rho ale' ,C,-,' a correa Copy o f the it pert L'i '' , ,i,,,tioglii' ; 1 tee of the Ifouse of c0,,0,00, ic,i,,,0 ilit,":4, dui of Sir Tiogr port:,.``.. It i' ,t- /eitc#'' satisfaaion we find our ti,,,t.:11-..cat , 3