The Sun. — London, England, 1837-06-30 00:00:00

sincerity whether or not he really means to betray his '.acted trust. The people of England will see the im mense importance of having this point cleared up ; for 'A-hat an awful business it would be if Lord Mel bourne were really to betray his sacred trust. The poor, unsuspecting Princess of 18, if Lord Melbourne's con 'science should really be touched, and if he should confess the horrid designs he meditates against his Royal Mistress, can never sufficiently repay the ser . • vices rendered to her by our Contemporary. What a I bleseing to a nation is a vigilant Press conducted by inen whose very slumbers are disturbed by their pain ' , jul apprehensions for the dangers which threaten roy :,alty ! What a load of guilt must he on the soul of Lord Melbourne, if after so solemn an adjuration, lie .Ishould dare to betray his Royal Alistress ! 0, most virtuous and disinterested Times ! How much the p eople of England owe that journal for the watchful 'care it bestows on our unsuspecting Queen !—Morning Chronicle. 1 The Times took much pains yesterday to persuade Ache people of England that in consequence of the ac cession of the Queen, the Church and Constitution eiof England are exposed to the most formidable dan hers, from which they were comparatively exempt prior To that event. Our Contemporary must, it is clear, '`=have utterly lost his senses, or have deliberately re solved to ruin in public estimation, if he can, the party "Aand the cause which he pretends to support. Which . - i [-'r'! )f the two suppositions is the true one, is, however, e. a matter of curiosity rather than of interest ; for if the object be to damage and disgrace the Conservative , cause, and to injure the reputation of the statesmen by :i:.. whom that cause is upheld, the failure must necessa- I e',-- :ily be complete. The scheme is neither so wellima '4ined nor so skilfully pursued that it can have the •, _slightest chance of success. There may be a few , 1 persons in Great Britain (we suspect the number is r. mall indeed) who entQrtain a mean opinion of the l; emiaent statesmen by whom in the two Houses of i Par r- , qia 9 m ° ent the Constitution of England is viLilantly and rivierotously defended. There may be in Great Bri eitani, and we fear there are, a greater number who Lles:re the overthrow of the Constitution, and who, ' Mintier ' l ~.. ntier the influence of this dc3ire, are anxious, above e, all things, to depreciate the character and talents of : .those who stand forwaul most prominently in its de- fence. But we venture confidently to say that not a -lsin ,, !e individual of either of these sections of the liWhig-Radical party can conscientiously say that they 14suspeet their Conservative opponents of any partici pation or any sympathy with the silly and disgusting trash which the journal we have mentioned put forth --yesterday about Queen Victoria and her illustrious .yesterday Our Contemporary, it seems, has a corm- Pispondent in Dublin, whom he vouches to be a man of 7ennimpeachable honour and character, alleging confl- Tend.; that any facts stated on his own authority are en titled to explicit credit. Now let us see in what man- Uer this correspondent "of unimpeachable honour g fan(' ele.iracter,” this correspondent " entitled to min fillie.:t credit," is permitted in the columns of the J limes to speak of our youthful Queen and of her 'lvirtueus and honourable parent :-- - i ‘• I attended Divine Service this day in the largest ecn • • -trojatiott of Protestants to he met ‘vaii Dublin, ao, from 'the 1. ,, h.5t to the lowest, in tlrecnt mourning ; and when put of the Litany was come to, if our present Queen 'lh:A :ward the andthle sobs of her oxn sex wherein her iearns was substituted in the place of a Protestant King, The would have !earned ,t better lesson titan ail the %%ad i.heorii.s of the Radicals and infidel's could have taught her !.vorldl-rainded mother. , A * 4: ~::: :: 4 ' 4 ' " As to ..shat I have heard I cannot of course Le so :nn -1,. j oden:. But this I wia tt'll )ou, as I am informed, that .. .hoze tvas not to be seen t! ii (1:1-: a person in mourning in iay. 11.,inun Catholic chapel in Dublin ; that there xure :.0 . pr,,.), rs offered up for the late King as, aceoroing to ~ . .lieir creed, there :Aiwa) 4; are ; that the Priests have for , vfluoct, mourning., and tiott not only prayeis, but thanlci -I,ivings, are offend up froin the Popish altars that our iroung Queen is inclined to embrace the old reli,,;ion of her ; -3 loreliithers, and immidiately the religion of her uncle Leo ; ~old and her own n.wher the Duchess of Ketit, who has 1 i w i ;- en Long a secret but a trusty believer—witness her re ,i p , ..a.ted largesses to the erection of Roman Catholic chapels • Ireland, and her having Mr. Shea so often at her t u lle, . ~ . . lind who has repaid the banquet by eulogising her in the i ilouse of Commons. * * They insist upon it, ,Isof-1;lt, that the yr,ung, Queen must marry a P,,pist ; that 'the Radicals and infidels laugh at all idea of religion, and ?rare not %l:om she marries ; that her present Ministry are ialike indifferent to religious motives, and that the genuine ..!ptinine Protestantism which once placed in the hands of :17:1;zabeth a sceptre which neither the Devil nor Popery . - -,:could w res t from h er , i s now fallen prostrate, broken, and - din ruins. Wc, Protestants, deny it with all our hearts and ':'souls ; we rely with implicit confidence upon the vital energy ii . ilof that holy religion which has made England what she is— ire!igion which essentially abhors perjury, loathes all deceit, ;evasiveness, or .double-dealing—thc religion not of Priest craft-tyranny, but of perfect freedom—the religion not of idolatrous ceremonies, but the religion of the heart ; that lreligion is now prevalent amongst the old and young of Pro 6testant Ireland, and it is not to be put down—all the Lord , - 4Durhams that ever came from that civilized region of Russia could not do it. We call upon the Protestact -Queen of England to protect us, her Protestant subjects of Ireland ; if not, we shall try to the uttermost to save her rand her Throne from evil councillors, aud we value our own lives only as they may be conducive to our holy religion." ;r. This might be regarded as pure unadulterated non- L Isense, but that its design and tendency are too ob : iNicusly mischievous to admit of its being treated with l'??the indulgence which might be granted to mere folly. It is more than folly. T i here s desperate and aborni- Llnable wickedness in the attempt to instil into the {minds of the people of England a suspicion th a t reli :4 ?igious principles are entertained by the Duchess of Kent, and have been instilled into the mind of her l - Idaughter, the avowal of which principles are, by the - ,Alaw of England, incompatible with the possession of the Crown. We do not stop to point out the thou `?sand circumstances of universal notoriety which give [lan effectual contradiction to the insinuated slander, :jar any attempt seriously to refute it would be ;little less absurd than the slander itself. It Ats difficult to conjecture to what class of readers ;the trash we have quoted is addressed. To the lowest, the most ignont, and the most credulous V m lwe arc bound to presume. But we have yet to learn 747 . Ithat there is in Great Britain any class so low, Li so ignorant, or so credulous as to be prepared for its reeeption. The Times, not content with d es cribi ng 'lithe mother of the Queen as a worldly-minded person jand a systematic perverter of the mind of her (laugh :,lter, treats the Sovereign herself with more than ra .l lAlical contempt, for the silly purpose of fixing upon Lord Melbourne a deeper responsibility than that ' . which the Constitution of England exacts of any Mi nister. There needs no such absurd device to fix ''.-., upon Lord Melbourne and his colleagues as mu c h Aresponsibility as they or any other human agents can _bear. They have, and will have, enough to answer • : i for, without exaggerating the responsibility by speak ___ -in , irrevercndly of the Sovereign as " an innocent and --, Ounsuspecting Princess of 18," as "an innocent and , ''ilinexperienced child," as one who "can have no intellec ?' tual or moral restraint over the actions" of her Minis ''l-,ters. The Constitution of England knows of no such dif lference of responsibility between the Ministers of one ~?,Sovereign and those of another. It holds the respon . lsibility of Ministers to be at all times, and in all cir -1 cumstances, perfect. To this responsibility no addition ... :..an be made. And the attempt to make any, now, is equivalent to the assertion that the law is wrong, and ought to be altered, which permits a youthful female M ascend the throne. It is at all times desirable that , lthe Ministers of the Crown should be worthy of the •71,:onfidence of the country, and should possess it. Lord . _ ,INlelbourne, we believe, ;wither mei its nor has obtained this confidence. It is a calamity that we should at .the ipresent time, or at any time, have a Minister so little -.;worthy of trust. But let us not, in the vain idea of . .oppressi ng L or d M e lb ourne w ith a res p ons ibili ty f or Awhich he is the last man in the world to care anytbing, ,',lorget the respect and reverence due to the Crown of . 7Enoland, in the name and by the a uth or ity o f w hi c h 'l, i i ne is for a short time longer permitted to act.----illorn ilia Post. Yesterday evening an inquest was .held at the Lou do:i Hoapital, Mile End-road, on the body of Emily Bryson, ...aged six years, the daughter of Henry Rapson, one of the ,messengers in the Bank of England. It appeared that the child had been slightly bitten by a puppy about three months since. The wound, which was a mere scratch, healed, and the .child continued in perfect health until Monday morning last, when decided symptoms of hydrophobia exhibited themselves, end she died of that dreadful malady in the above institution on Wednesday. The jury found a verdict to that effect. COURT OF CASSATION. (Sitting of June 22.—M. de Portalis, President.) DUELLING.—An important question, namely, whether duelling is permitted under the present laws, came on for discussion this morning in the above Court. It was pre viously known that M. Dupin, Procureur-General, arid President of the Chamber of Deputies, was to deliver his opinion on this subject, consequently the different parts of the Court appropriated to the bar as well as to the public were crowded at an early hour. Shortly after the President had entered the Court, at half-past 11. M. DEHAUSSY, the Counsel appointed to draw up a re• port of the circumstances which led to this inquiry, ad dressed the Court, and submitted the following facts for its consideration : On the 29th of January last, two gentlemen—the one M. Baron, a solicitor, and the other M. Pesson, a Deputy Solicitor at the Chamber of Commerce—happened to be supping at two separate tables at a cafe in the City of Tours. In consequence of some words over-heard by the one, and supposed to have been meant as an insult to himself, a quarrel arose, the result of which was, that M. Pesson, the Deputy Solicitor, received a box on the cheek from the Solicitor, M. Baron, who ima gined himself the object of the sarcasms of the former. A challenge was forthwith given and accepted, and on the following morning the two adversaries met on the ground fixed on the previous evening. To M. Pesson, as the offended party, belonged the right of choosing the arms : he decided in favour of swords ; his adversary, however, having declared his total inability to use this weapon, having never handled one, M. Pesson agreed to fight with pistols. It was then agreed to send for pistols, which were soon pro cured, but on their being brought M. Baron said he should prefer the sword, as with that instrument he should at least have a chance of protecting his life. One of the swords was longer than the other, and, upon drawing lots, the former was declared to belong to M. Baron. After an useless effort at reconciliation on the part of the seconds, the combatants took their stand, and after a few minutes' fighting M. Baron fell mortally wounded. The fatal blade penetrated to the extent of several inches through his right breast. At the expiration of a few seconds he ceased to exist. M. Pesson, his antagonist, was also wounded, but slightly, in the shoulder. Proceedings were commenced by the legal authorities against the author of this deplorable event ; but a decree of the Council Chamber of the Tribunal of Tours, followed by a decree of the Royal Court of Orleans, declared that there were no grounds for prosecuting M. Pesson, inasmuch as the Penal Code was silent on the subject, and consequently the fact imputed could not be legally considered as a :crime or an offence. The Attorney-General of the Royal Court of Orleans ap pealed against the above decree ; Ist, upon tile ground of an erroneous application of article 364 of the code of crimi nal proceedings ; and 2d, on that of a violation and false in terpretation o. articles 295, 296, and 302, of the Criminal Code. At ti!e conelu.ion of the licTort, The President, addressing the bar, inquired if any coun sel was rad' ned in this case, and on roeckin7 no answer, infora.c.l M. Unpin, the Proeureur-General, that it then devolved on him to :address the Court. M. Dupin then rare and spoke as follows Gentle men—The question relative to duels is one which Las ex cited anti still excites, nest anxious and general attention. As yet of Lions are divided upon thi.; subject, which has been differently viewed according to the varying- forms of jerisprudence, the change of times, want: s, ideas, and the several degrees of civilization. By some it has been consi &red as a sort of palladium, a safeguard of their honour ond Co: tame ; but by others it ices regarded in quite a dif ferent light, and stiginntized as tin bra:it:le pr.judiee and a remnaet of barbarous ages. Tiles various opinions have passed from nee to age, have oceupied the attention of tie most conseientioes and profound lawyers who espoused different sides of the question. It must, however, be ad mitted, thit the wises, amongst the number always con tended that ilueEing eas in itself a culpable act, a real erimit, and co;ht as south to be stamped with the .broad letters of the Petoil Code." The learned I'n - tett:cur- Gerterui havie; vont:I:Ilea the above exordium, oltservud, hat althon:li 1 eo! authorities and cases of jori,pru dehee Of late years seemed opposed to his opinion, he shoal:! (with fall confidence in the independent spirit of the Court) role tvcur to prove that duels followed by iffir sion of bided came within the application of articles 2L5, 29fi, U 2, 30=', and 811 of the Penal Code, which de crees punLhment more or less severe in cases in which blows or wounds pave been intentionally hiflicted, or volun tary homicide committed. The learned magistrate then drew the attention of the Court to the ancient legislation on this head ; lie showed that in the feudal times the sa tisfactioa afforded to the offended party by duelling could only be claimed by persons of noble Mirth, and whese con duct in such cases was not altogether screened ficm all lege' observation, hot, might be submitted to a tribunal spe cially appointed for this purpose ; that a plebeian (villain) who Inn! the insolence to challenge a nobleman was almost sure to meet with an itidignant refusal from his adversary, and if fortunate enough to find a champion who consented to measure a s:vord with his, he was subsequently prose noted and Lanced for his contempt of nobility. The Re voletien of I 789 abolished nobility, and with it the special enactments upon duelling ; the community then parted un der the du:ninion of the common law which is the law or right of villains. The Procureur-General next took a view of Coe legislation of 1791, of the code of the third Bru maire, year Four, and of the penal code of 1810 ; he maintaitied that es the general terms of those enactments specified pur.iebriwnt in cases of murder, or of wounds vo luntorily ibllicted, the same provisions ought to apply to duelling followed by similar effects. After some observa tions in opposition to the decrees of the Court of Cessation, pronounced in April 1819, and December, 1824, M. Un pin concluded his address by calling on the Court to annul the decree issued in the present case. The Court, after a deliberation which lasted nearly two hours, came to a decision which completely alters its juris prudence in this point, and adopting the arguments urged by the Learned Procureur-General pronounced tile follow ing decree : "Taking into consideration articles 295, 296,297,302,309, 310, and 328, of the Penal Code, as well as the fact that the special legislation upon duels had been abolished by the laws of the Constituent Assembly, it cannot be inferred that this abolition made a tacit exception in favour of mur der committed, and wounds and wilful injuries inflicted, by duelling. ‘. That according to the code of crimes and offences of 1791, those particular kinds of murders, wounds, blows, &c., remained under the power of the common law ; that the decree of the Order of the day of the 29th Messidor, Year 2, only referred to the military code, and only related to mere provocations of soldiers addressed to their superior officers. " That the code of the third Brumaire, Year 4, was drawn up, with the same view as that of 1791. " As much as the provisions of articles 295 and 296 of the Penal Code are absolute and without exception, that persons guilty of crimes specified therein should be prose cuted in every instance ; that if in cases laid down by arti cles 327, 328, and 329, of the same code, the council cham bers and the chambers of accusation were at liberty to de clare that homicide, wounds, and blows, did not constitute a crime of offence, because they were authorized by actual and lawful necessity of self-defence, or that of others, it could not be admitted that homicide committed, wounds and blows inflicted, in a single combat, the fatal result of a previous agreement between two individuals, were autho rized by absolute necessity and lawful self-defence, for in this case the danger was entirely voluntary, the defence without necessity, and the danger avoidable without combat. " Considering that if no legislative enactment made a crime of duelling, properly so called, and the circumstances which led to or accompanied this act of homicide, no legal provision included these circumstances in the number of those which render murder, wounds, and blows justifiable. " That it is an inviolable maxim of our public legislation, that no one can take the levy into his own hands, that justice is a debt of the whole body of society, and that all justice emanates from the King, in whose name this debt is paid. (Art. 48 of the Charter.) " That it is another equally sacred maxim of our public law, that any agreement contrary to good conduct, contra bonos mores, and to public order, was null and void, and consequently ought not to paralyse the hand of justice, or suspend the course of public chastisement, by excusing a crime against morality and natural rights. " Considering that an agreement to fight a duel, entered into by two persons who assume the right of setting aside the laws, and of disposing of their own lives, thus doubly usurping the rights of society, comes precisely within the description of an agreement or convention, contra bonus »IG-• res, and contrary to public order ; " If, however, notwithstanding the silence of the law and the radical fault of such an agreement, it could be compared to a legal excuse, it could only be appreciated in a court of justice, and decided by a jury. '• That it results from the above, that whenever a murder has been committed, wounds or blows inflicted, the judges called on to examine into the facts are not required to as certain whether such murder, wounds, Sze., were the result of a single combat arranged between the parties, and dis miss the case upon this proof, consequently that they can not (without usurping the power of juries, especially under the authority of the law of April 28, 1832) decide in such a case, which'must be submitted, even upon ground of pal liation, to the dictum of a jury. " And as, according to article 1:•6 of the Charter, no cl.ange can be effected in the institution of juries, except by an express law, the law courts cannot take upon tlamselves to pronounce in the above cases without infringing the rights and privileges of juries. " It, therefore, appearing from the above decree that the individual named Pesson engaged in :a duel, and caused the death of a person named Baron, that notwithstanding the proof of the fact, the Chamber of Accusation of the Royal Couit of Orleans declared that there were no grounds for a prosecution in the absence of any special penal law against duelling, that the judgment so pronounced was an express violation of the articles 295, 296, 297, and 302, of the said Penal Code. " Upon the above ground the Court annuls that decree, and refers the case to the Royal Court of Bourges : " The responsible editor of the Europe has been cited to appear on Saturday next before the Assize Court, to answer for an article relative to the fatal accident in the Champ de Mars. M. Plough°lm, Advocate-General, will support the accusation on behalf of the Crown.—Courrier Francais. IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF COMMONS, Jrra 29. The SPEAKER took the Chair at the usual hour. Mr. Campbell, from the East India House, presented returns which were laid on the table. LONDON AND BRIGHTON RAILWAY. Lord G. LENNOX brought up the Report of the Com mittee on the London and Brighton (Rennin's) Railway Bill, and moved that the Report be taken into further con sideration to-morrow.---Agreed to. Captain PECHELL gave notice that to-morrow he would present a petition from 80,000 inhabitants of Brigh ton, in favour of that line. LONDON AND SOUTHAMPTON RAILWAY. On the motion of Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE, the Lords' amendments to the London and Southampton Rail way Bill were agreed to. NEWCASTLE ON TYNE IMPROVEMENT. Mr. ORD moved that the Lords' Amendments to the Newcastle on Tvne Improvement Bill be agreed to. Mr. HODGSON II INDE said the House was not aware of the nature of the amendments that had been made. The SPEAKER said the amendments were of a very important nature, and it would be desirable that some plan should be devised for putting the House in possession of the amendments made by the House of Lords. In one case no loss than 17 clauses had been added to a Bill in the other House. Mr. HUME thought the amendments ought to be printed. The SPEAKER said the best plan would be to refer these amendments to a Committee. The amendments were then agreed to. MANCHESTER GAS. On the motion of 111 r. BROTHERTON, the Lords' amendments to the Manchester Gas Bill were agreed to. DUNDEE POLICE. On the motion of Sir HENRY PARNELL, - the Dundee Police NU was read a second time, and ordered to be committed. CORK AND PASSAGE RAILWAY. On the motion of Mr HAMILTON, the Cork and Passage Bajw.ly Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed. BISHOP AUCKLAND AND WEARMOUTH RAILWAY. On the motion of Mr. PEASE the Bishop Auckland and Wearmouth Railway Bill was read a third time and passt.d. DURHAM AND SUNDERLAND RAILWAY. On the motion of Mr. TOOKE the Lords Ammdments to the alrl;,;n1 and Sondeillnd Rtilway Bill were agreed to, Mr. DILLWYN broLOit up the reprt of the Com mitt,e on the Duke of Beanfort's Estate iiill. YORK AND NORTH MIDLAND RAILWAY BILL. On the motion of Mr. LOWTHER the Lor.li Amendmen! to this Bill were agreed to. LOUGH SWILLY AND LOUGH FOYLE DRAINAGE BILL. Captain JONES brought up the Reput of the Corn. mittee on the above 13i:1. BLACK WALL COMMEIZCIAL RAILWAY EXTENSION BILL. Mr. A J.STON moved the third reading of the above Bill. M. C W FORD t. as sorry to disturb the equanimity of ti,e House upon the sul:ject of Railways ; hut the one then !refore the licue was one of a large and important nature. Ti:e question was, whether Railways were to be brought throu , lh the very heart of a city like London, at .whatevc.r expense it might cost ? He know that it was no use his detaining the House with arguments ; he would, therefore, simply mote that the Bill be read a thi; d time that day three months. Mr.GßO'f E suonded the motion. Mr. P. MAXWELL STE W ART said this wa3 a nicst extraordinary proceeding. Mr. H. lIIN DE—He does not divide. Mr. CRAW FORD did not know how any one could answer for him. mo3t certainly would divide the House upon the question, which was very important to his con stituents. Mr. P. M. STEWART must then repeat his surprise at. such a course. The Bill was in Committee for eighteen (lays, ood the division on the preamble was 14 to 4. The House had affirmed that decision last night, and he trusted it tvould not allow its time to be wasted in such a vindictive pursuit of a Bill. Mr. CRAWFORD did not see why his right to make the motion he had done should be called in question. In his observations last night he had ver3 distinctly given no tice of his intention to oppose the Bill in every stave. Mr. ANGERSTEIN had most closely attended the Committee, awl, in his opinion, the Bill would be most in jurious to the interests of the public. He was perfectly certain of that, and, therefore, he hoped the House would reject the Bill. Sir S. W HALLEY thought the Bill would be con ducive to the best interests of commerce, and therefore he would support it. The House then divided, when there appeared— For the third reading of the Bill Against it Majority in favour of the third reading —3O The Bill was consequently read a third time and passed. GRAND - COLLIER DOCK. On the motion of Captain ALSAGER, the Grand Col• tier Dock Bill was read a third time and passed. ADMISSION TO PUBLIC EDIFICES. Mr. H UAIE presented a petition from the c )ffee-house keepers of London, praying for the reduction of the duty on tea and sugar ; also a petition from a parish in Fifeshire, praying for the abolition of the Corn-laws. Ti.e Hon. Member also presented a petition, agreed to at a meeting held at the Freemasons' Tavern, praying that St. Paul's and other public edifices might be thrown open for the inspec tion of the public without any charge whatever. It was his intention, bad time permitted, to have moved that the petition should be printed, in order to bring the subject regularly before the House, but under existing circumstances he should not do so. With respect to the Tower, lie understood that there would be no difficulty whatever to the admission of the public, as the officers of that establishment were most anxious to givd free access to the placo ; and with respect to St. Paul's, it was but just for him to state that the city of London had agreed to adopt measures for the preservation of the monuments there, if the public were admitted free of any expense. The Hon. Member presented a similar petition from Tunbridge Wells. Sir E. KNATCHBULL presented a petition from Dover, approving of the manner in which the affairs of the harbour had been conducted by the Board of Directors. Mr. DENNISTOUN presented a petition from the in habitants of Glasgow, complaining of distress, and attribut ing it to the existence of the C o rn Laws. Captain ALSAGER presented a petition from certain rectifying distillers against the IMprisonment for Debt Bill. Mr. M. STEWART presented a petition from the prisoners in Lancaster Castle in favour of the Imprisonment for Debt Bill. SWAN RIVER. Mr. HUME begged to ask the Secretary for the Colo nies a question. He had received a letter from Swan River, dated the 10th of January, and he held in his hand a newspaper, confirming the statements in the letter, by which he was informed that notice had been given of a law to be enacted there which would destroy the Press. The measure purported to be for the suppressing of blasphemous and seditious publications ; but he had received a newspaper from certain persons in that colony which they stated would be the last they should publish, on account of the proceedings adopted by the Government. One of the last acts of a Government in his (Mr. H.'s) opinion should be that of interfering with the Press, a n d therefore he wished to ask whether that measure had re ceived the sanction of her Majesty's Ministers ? Sir GEORGE GREY said the last information the Government had received from that colony was dated the 10th of November last, and that no such measure as that which the Hon. Member had referred to had come to the knowledge of the Government. IRISH MAGISTRACY. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON rose to present a petition i'rom the Deputy Lieutenants and three other Magistrates of the county of Kerry, complaining of the conduct of Go vernment in Ireland. They complained that a chief-constable, M‘DJnogh, hal grossly insulted them on several occa sions—that a memorial had been addressed to the Lord- Lieutenant, and after repeated applications inquiry was promised. After very considerable delay an Investigation took place before the Hon. Thomas Browne, Vice-Lieu tenant of the county ; and a Mr. Shea Lalor, a member of the National Association, was sent down by the Government to conduct it.—(Hear.) All the charges brought by the Magistrates against Mr. M•Donogh had been established satisfactorily, and all the charges which Mr. M‘Donogli alleged against them fell to the ground. -It was then stated that tile notes of the investigation had been mislaid, and that no opinion could' be pronounced by the Government upon the matter. - It subsequently turned out that the notes had been carried off by Mr. Shea Lalor ; and up to the present time the magis trates had received no intimation from the Government as to its decision upon the investigation. He should be exceedingly glad if the Noble Lord could justify the course that had been adopted ; but, at all events, he would submit that, under the circumstances, the magistrates were entitled to the investigation they now prayed for. Lord MORPETH did not mean to follow the Hon. and Learned Member through the long detail into which he had entered, but he thought he could shortly and simply meet the statements contained in the petition, by merely reading a letter which within the last few days had been ad dressed, by order of the Lord Lieutenant, to the Hon. Thomas Brown, Vice-lieutenant of the county of Kerry. He thought he should also be able sufficiently to explain the delay that had occurred, and obviate the objection that no result had been communicated by the Lord Lieutenant. The Noble Lord then read the letter in a very low tone of voice. We understood it to say, that the Lord-Lieu tenant regretted the long delay, which he accounted for by the fact, that the first copy of the minutes of the inquiry were destroyed by fire. The original was in the hands of Mr. Lalor, who could not furnish another copy for some time. Then, again, public business interfered, and the vo luminous nature of the notes of the investigation, which required much study, fully accounted for the delay that bad taken place. His Lordship, upon mature consideration of the evidence, was of opinion that the admi nistration of justice in the district of Listowel, con ducted as it had been, did not merit the respect and confidence of the public, and with respect to the conduct of Chief Constable M'Donogh, his Excellency considered that he had been guilty of great want of respect to the bench, and that his conduct was repre hensible, and lie had commanded him to be severely re primanded and removed from his present station. His Excellency, however, was glad that nothing had been proved respecting his moral character, and as he had always con ducted himself with great zeal in the discharge of his duty, his Excellency regretted that his judgment had not always been equal to his zeal. With regard to two of the magistrates, his Excellency thought that they had shoWn much indiscretion on the bench and with regard to another, his Excellency considered that it would conduce much to the peace and quietness of the district of Listowell, if the Lord Chancellor were advised to remove his name from the Commission. His Excel lency also intimated the intention of the Government to ap point a stipend to the magistrate of the district, and he greatly deprecated the practice which had been proved to exist, of Magistrates receiving gratuitous labour from the poor. It would appear from that letter that the delay arose entirely from accidental circumstances, and he was sorry to add that the Report, which was so anxiously called for did - not at all amount to an acquittal of the Magistrates. Sir R. INGLIS begged to ask by whom the letter was written, and by whose order, and to whom it was addressed ? Lord MORPET II had set out with stating all these circumstances. The letter was written by the Under Se cretary in Ireland, by order of the Lord Lieutenant, and was addressed to Mr. Brown, Vice-Lieutenant of the county of Kerry. Dr. LEFROY said the petition upon the face of it af forded grounds for a very grave imputation upon the con duct of Government. From the document which had just been read to the House, it might fairly be presumed that all that was sought for was some grounds for the ac pointment of a stipendiary magistrate. Lord MORPETH begged it to be remembered that the charges against the Magistrates were not sought for by the Government, but were made the subject of investiga tion by representations addressed to the Government. As things had taken the course they had now done, he felt that he could not object to the production of the evidence. only cbjeetion was to its very voluminous nature. Mr. o'CoNNELL defended the conduct of Mr. Shea Lalor, who was a gentleman by birth, wealth, and educa tion, and who was the equal, if not the superior of the Learned Sergeant. The Magistrates, he was happy to say, would gain little by having the evidence printed. It hal already been printed, day by day, in the newspapers, and the charges made against them had been clearly proved. Mr. Sergeant JACKSON had stated only one fact that was not in the petition, and that was that Mr. S. Lalor had belonged to the Association, and he did not think that they were proper people to be employed by the Government. With reTect to the insinuations of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, he received them as he did any other coming from the seine source. Mr. O'CONNELL said, the Learned Gentleman was perfectly welcome to receive them as he pleased. With respect to Mr. Lalor, he would receive the insinuations of the L,..:arricd Sergeant as they deserved to be received by any r bonourable man.—(Cries of " Order.") Captain JONES could assure the House, that however it might be ith Magistrates in the south of Irdand, no Mag;strate of the north of Ireland ever received gratuitous Ltbour from the poor.—(" Hear, hear," from Mr. O'Con nell.) Mr. WALLACE presented a petition from the Ma gistrates and Town Council of Greenock, praying that some means might be adopted for the better conducting of the private business before the House. The petition alleged that according to the present mode of conducting the business the expense was enormous : and there was no com munity in Scotland who bad not suffered by it during the last three years. He (Mr. W.) was aware that a Com mittee had been appointed to investigate the subject, but he felt convinced that no plan could be devised for its im provement, unless the private business was transacted before the measure came into that House. The Hon. Member also presented a petition from Greenock, in favour of Uni versal Suffrage ; also a petition from a parish in Fife for the total abolition of the Corn Laws. Mr. SHAW presented a petition from the diocese of Ferns against the Irish Tithe Bill. On the motion of the SOLICITOR-GENERAL, the Lords Amendments to the Shire Hall Bill, after a few ob servations front Mr. Grote, were agreed to. SUGAR DUTIES. On the motion of Mr. BARING, the Sug2r Duties Bill was read a third time and passed. The Rolls Estate Bill went through Committee, and was ordered to be reported to-morrow. The Civil Bill Courts (Ireland) Bill was reported. The Court of Exchequer (Scotland) Bill went through a Committee, and was ordered to be read a third time to morrow. A Message from the Lords brought up several Railway Bills. IMPRISONMENT FOR DEBT BILL. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved the Order of the Day for the House going into Committee on the Im prisonment for Debt Bill. . Mr. SHAW could scarcely suppose that the Hon. and . Learned Attorney-General anticipated the Bill would pass into a law this Session, and, therefore, it would be better to postpone it for the present. He did not mean to offer any objection to it himself, but there were several Gentlemen who generally offered objections that were absent, and who had not received any notice of its coming on to-night. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that his Noble Friend, the Home Secretary, had stated distinctly the other night that the Government would press the Impri sonment for Debt Bill through Parliament this Session, and he himself had yesterday announced that he should bring it on to-day. He regretted that any Member should be absent, but he could not for that reason postpone the further consideration of so important a measure. Sir E. KNATCHBULL hoped the - Hon. and Learned Gentleman would not proceed with the Bill this evening. He thought it would only be a waste of time, because he believed there was no probability of its passing the House of Lords this Session. 'I he ATTORNEY-GENERAL felt there was a strong probability of its passing the other House ; because some of the clauses of the Bill were so framed as to meet the views of several Noble Lords who had opposed it last Session. Mr. Alderman COPELAND considered the House had not had sufficient notice of the intention of bringing on this measure, which was one of immense importance, its object being the alteration of the entire law of debtor and creditor. It had not been forwarded a single stage since the 6th of April, and they were now to proceed with it, having had only one day's notice of such intention, which he was bound to say, as a tradesman and a merchant, was monstrous in the extreme. Sir It. INGLIS did not know whether the Hon. and Learned Attorney-General had come to any understanding with the other House that the Bill should pass this Ses sion. He saw no use in the House of Commons proceed ing with the measure, unless there was a bona fide expecta tion of carrying it through the other House this Session. The ATTORNEY.GENERA.L would not boast of any under Standing with the other House of Parliament ; and he was happy to say that he had never had any mis understanding with that House. All lie knew was that the Bill would go up to the other house in the fair expec tation of its passing this Session. The House then went into Committee on the Bill. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said that last Sssion there had been some objections made to the powers given to the Commissioners in the 13th clause, and he should now move an amendment, the object of which was to limit their power of committing persons for creating any riot or disturbance in the Court to one month. Alderman COPELAND objected to any such power Leing granted to the Commissioners. In the event of an unfortunate debtor remonstrating against any order of the Court, it might be construed into a riot or disturbance, end the party might thereupon be committed. The ATTORN E Y-GEN E RA L—lf the Commis sioners acted in such a way they would be halite to an ac tion of trespass, and a jury would award heavy damages against them. The amendment was then agreed to. Clauses up to 32, after a short discussion, were agreed to. On clause 32 being put, which gave compensation to gaolers, Mr. WYNNE and Mr. PEASE objected to the clause. Mr. HUME moved its rejection. Strangers were then ordered to withdraw, but no division took place, and the clause as amended was agreed to. The other clauses were then agreed to, and the Report was ordered to be received to-morrow. On the motion of Lord J. RUSSELL the Offences against the Person Bill, the Robbery and Stealing from the Person Bill, the Burglary and Stealing in a Dwelling House Bill, the Burning and Destroying Buildings and Ships Bill, the Transportation for Life Bill, and the Tithe Commuta tion Act Amendment Bill, were severally read a third time and passed. The Beet Root Sugar Bill was read a second time and ordered to be committed to-morrow (this day.) MASTERS AND WORKMEN -13 ILL. On the motion of Mr. P. THOMSON, this Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. FINAL REGISTER OF ELECTORS BILL. Lord J. RUSSELL moved the Order of the Day for going into Committee on this Bill. Sir E. KNATCHBULL said that on the eve of a ge neral election, and on a subject with respect to which there was so much diversity of opinion, he did not think it proper to proceed with this measure. The House then divided, when there appeared— Ayes Noes Majority -53 The Ho❑se then went into Committee, Mr. Robert Stewart in the Chair. The several clauses were then agreed to, and, on the mo tion that the Bill be read a third time, Mr. Sergeant GOULBURN said that he could not but protest against the disingenuous method of such a proceed ing. The Noble Lord had said that no Bills of this nature should pass this Session. The business of the country was alone to be attended to, and he did think it most unfair that a measure so essentially and vitally affecting the interests of the people should be now pressed, and he thought it was done for electioneering purposes only. He would not make such a charge jibe thought he was not borne out by the fact. Sir R. H. INGUS and Sir E. KNATCHDULL repeated their objections to proceeding at the eve of a general election. Lord J. RUSSELL said it was not easy to decide which were public Bills and which were not. It might have been said of the Common Law Courts Bill that it was not a public measure.—( Hear, hear, and laughter.) It was sup ported by the Learned Sergeant. The Learned Sergeant said his Bill was one of public interest ; so on that side of the House it was said of the present. These were matters of taste ; but as he thought this was a good Bill it ought to ho pressed. Mr. GOULBURN said that it might be a very good personal argument of the Noble Lord, but it did not in the least affect the merits of the question. The Noble Lord had practised a delusion upon the House, and after assuring the House that business was to cease, except only as concerned particular measures, this Bill was brought forward. After a few words from Lord STANLEY the Bill was ordered to be reported to the House. JEWISH MARRIAGES. The Jewish Marriages Bill went through Committee, and was ordered to be reported. MILITARY COMMISSIONS. The Military Commissions Bill went through Committee. A 'Message from the Lords brought up the Registration of Births, D,aths, and Marriages Act Amendment Bill. REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS, DEATHS, AND MARRIAGES. On the motion of Lord JOHN RUSSELL, the House resolved itself into Committee for the consideration of the Lords' amendments to the Registration of Births, Deaths, and Marriages Act Amendment Bill. The amendments were severally taken and agreed to. BILLS OF EXCHANGE. Mr. GROTE moved that the House resolve itself into Committee on the Bills of Exchange Bill. Lord S A NDON objected to the Bill. The CHANCELOR of the EXCHEQUER said guch a measure was absolutely necessary, and that if the lion. Member had not been there to move it he would have moved it himself. He, therefore, supported the motion. Mr. WA KLEY opposed it, because it went to abrogate the Usury Laws. After a few words from Mr. Hume, Mr. Robinson, Col. Thomson, Mr. Foster, and Mr. Goulburn the House went into Committee. The Bill then went through the Committee, and was or derA to be reported. The Coroners (Durham) Bill was read a second time, and ()Tiered to be committed to-morrow. The Freemen's Admission Bill went through a Committee The Reform of Parliament (Ireland) Bill was read a se cond time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. Tile Summary Conviction (Juvenile Offenders) Bill was read a second time,. and ordered to be committed. NEW SOUTH WALES. Sir G. GREY moved, pursuant to notice, for leave to bring in a 13i11 to continue in force for another year an Act passed in the 9th of George IV., to provide for the adminis tration of justice - in New South \Vales and Van Diemen's Land, and for other purposes relating thereto. After a few words from Mr. H. BULWER and Mr. HUMS the motion was agreed to. THAMES TUNNEL. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EX CIIEQUER the following Committee was appointed to cons;der the papers now before the House respecting the Thames Tunnel :—Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Viscount Morpeth, Mr. Walter, Sir Robert Harry Inglis, Mr. Hume, Mr. Alderman Wood, Captain Alsager, Mr. Grote, Mr. Bramston, Mr. Baring, Mr. Warburton, Mr. Goulburn, Mr. Hawes, Sir Thomas Fremantle, Lord Vis count Sandon, Mr. Thornely. Adjourned at Half-past Eight o'Clock. HOUSE OF LORDS, Jm 29. Lord SIIAFTESBURY, in the absence of the LORD CHAN CELLOR, took his seat on the Woolsack at Five o'Clock. Mr. BERNAL and other Members of the House of Com mons brought up the Blackwell Commercial Railway Bill, the Yorkshire and North Midland Railway Bill (stating the Commons had agreed to their Lordships' amendments), the Newcastle-upon-Tyne Improvement Bill, Taffvale Railway Bill, the Blockairn Canal Bill, and several other Private Bills. The Duke of BUCCLEUGH presented petitions from Dundee against the Dundee Waterworks Bill. DUBLIN POLICE BILL. On the motion of Viscount DUNCANNON this Bill went through Committee, and was reported. FOREIGN OFFICERS ENLISTMENT BILL. Viscount DUNCANNON, in moving the second read ing of this Bill observed that Foreign Officers could not at present be promoted to the rank of Major-General, and the object of the Bill was to obviate this. The Duke of WELLINGTON thought there could be no objections to the Bill, as there was no doubt under the present law great injustice was done to deserving offi cers, when it was desirable to remove them. The Bill VV3S then read a second time. MARRIAGE ACT AMENDMENT BILL. The Earl of SHREWSBURY said that in moving the clause he had given notice of yesterday, it would not be necessary for him to say more than a few words? The Bill was framed for the purpose of removing the grievances which Dissenters laboured under, and amongst the rest Roman Catholics. In the Bill of last year it was pro vided that the Bill should only apply to separate build. jogs, but the places of worship of Roman Catholics were not generally so, and in the clause made to obviate the difficulty this Session, the words " consecrated or blessed" were introduced, but these were objected to ; he would therefore move that in place of these words should be introduced these " Roman Catholic chapels, licensed and used as such." In fact, were not the amendment made, the Roman Catholics would be placed in a worse condition than they ever were in, for the marriage ceremony would be little more than a mere civil contract. If there was a Will to alter the provision, so as to render it satisfactory, ac cording to the old adage, there was a way also. He trusted, therefore, that the amendment would be agreed to, which was, " that any building licensed amused as a Roman Ca tholic chapel for one year, should be taken as a separate building." The amendment was agreed to. The Bishop of GLOUCESTER then moved the inser tion of this Clause :—" And be it enacted and declared that nothing, in the said recited Act shall be held to com• pel a Clergyman of the Established Church to solemnize a marriage, if the banns have not been published according to the rubric, or unless the parties have obtained a license." Lord ELLENBOROUGH said that he apprehended the House could not agree to the clause proposed by the R! ht Reverend Prelate, as it would leave it optional with the Clergyman when to perform the ceremony, and to thus favour some parties would tend to disparage the Church ; he trusted therefore the House would not consent to the amendment, as the principle of the Act was that every facility afforded to the Dissenter should be afforded to the Clergy of the Church of England ; but the proposed clause Would have the contrary effect. After a few words from the Bishop of HEREFORD, Lord MA L MESBURY said that the amendment of the Right Rev. Prelate would be offering a premium to members of the Church of England to become Dissenters ; or, if a difficulty to the performance of the ceremonyt arose in the Church of England, the party would have it performed by a Dissenter. The Bishop of GLOUCESTER replied, saying he would leave the whole matter in their Lordships' hands. .' Lord ELLENBOROUGH suggested an a mended clause, in order to supply some words which had been omitted List year. The Bishop of HEREFORD thought if the Noble • Baron's amendment were carried, the House would afford every facility for clandestine marriages. The Bishop of EXETER thought nothing could be more loosely worded than the clause as it then stood., Its effect would be to open a door to all sorts of clan destine marriages, and it contained no sort of security whatever, by which a proper protection could be afforded to the public. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said in the present as w 4,11 as in the Bill of last year, they had done every thing in th eir power in the framing of the clauses to prevent clandestine marriages. The Bishop of EXETER would rather leave the evil in all its deformity, which would be in some degree a pro tection than attempt to patch it up by expedients like the present. The Bishop of HEREFORD denied that the clause would have the effect stated by the Right Rev. Prelate (the Bishop of Exeter). The LORD CHANCELLOR said the object of the clause was to confine the marriage within the district to which -the notice applied, and contended that the clause was in its provisions and operations a restrictive one. The Bishop of HEREFORD then proposed that these words in the original clause be left out, " in the district in which the supervising Registrar re3ides ;" and that. the word!,, " the Church in the parish in which one of the parties shall have resided for twenty-one days." The Gallery was then cleared for a division ; but as all the lay Peers left the House and the Rev. Prelates were left to themselves, they seeing such a majority against them, withdrew the clause. On our re-admission to the Gallery we found The Bishop of HEREFORD moving that the words, " Provided that such Church be in the parish in which one of the parties resides" be added to the clause. Strangers were again ordered to withdraw, but, as be fore, no division tcok place—the words were withdrawn — and the Bill was read a third time and passed. POST-OFFICE MANAGEMENT BILL. The Earl of LICHFIELD said that by this measure no party who had any claims would be excluded by this Bill more than by the present law ; the tolls which were disputed by the Post-office would not be affected by it. Lord LYND HURST said that he was aware of a disputed toll, and this Act would decide it in fa vour of the Post Office. The words in the Bill were " except such tolls as were excepted by this Act ;" but the title be referred to was not excepted, and he was sure that the House • would not do such an act of injustice as to deprive the party of his right to dispute the right he claimed to the toll. He would therefore move the insertion of the words " or any other legal title." The Earl of LICHFIELD said that the Post Office dis puted the right to the toll, and the law would not be altered as respected the claim, as the Bills were merely a consolida tion of the Post-office laws. Lord LYNDIIU RST said that the Bill would decidedly take away the legal right to claim the toll from the pa► tics, he alluded to—William Grant of Chattesley's Ferry. The LORD CHANCELLOR said that the Bill should not have the effect of taking from any individual his legal rights. - The Earl of LICHFIELD said he would have no ob jection to the insertion of the words, if it would not injure the Bill. Lord LYNDHURST said he was sure the Noble Earl, had no intention of injuring any of the parties. Lard HARDWICK Cs:Lid - that he "would risk the loss of the Bill rather than injure the rights of any individual. The Amendment was then agreed to, and the Bill read a third time and passed. Mr. BARING and other Members of the Commons brought up the Sugar Duties Bill, the Pillory Punishment Bill, the Shire Halls Bill, stating that the Commocs had agreed to their Lordships' amendments ; the Wills Bill, the Chester and Grand Junction Railway Bill. IRISH MEASURES. The Marquis of CL A NRICA RDE wished to know wbatV was to be done with the Public Works (Ireland) Bill, and' the County Treasurers Bill, which was one of importance ;1] and the other Irish measures, the Tithe Corporation and Irish Poor Law Bills. He believed the latter were to be postponed Viscount MELBOURNE said his Noble Friend had not merely offered a question, but he had also given at answer. In the importance of the three measures referred to by the Noble Marquis he entirely concurred. He cer tainly very deeply felt the importance of the Bill with re spect to corporations in Ireland, and therefore he could not admit the propriety of postponing it. He considered it of great importance both with respect to its own pro visions, and with respect to the opinions which were enter tained of it in that country ; but when he recollected that in a former part of the Session, upon the motion for going into Committee, that the opposition to that motion way' made, in order to wait for certain other Bills then before i the House of Commons, and considering the advanced pc riod of the Session and the present state of the publi( business, he certainly should not think it expedient to pm aced with that measure. It was, therefore, his intention' not to propose going into Committee on that (Hear, hear.) With respect to the other two Bilh‘i mentioned by the Noble Marquis, he had the same anH swer to give, for they were both measures which required more consideration than they could receive in the present Session. The other Bills were of less importance. Thee Public Works Bill was only waiting for the Roy a l Assent,' and the Medical Charities Bill would not be proceeded' with, but the County Treasurers Bill would be pro-1 ceeded with. The Duke of WELLINGTON said that in the for - , mer discussion he had expressed his opinion as to the connec-, tion between the Irish Corporation Bill and the othei measures depending before the other House of Parlia-; ment. He now entertained the same opinion, but it never- 1 theless was his most sincere wish and desire to see a conH elusion put to that question--(Hear, hear)—to see a settlement of the 'fithe question—(Hear, hear)—which ori ginated in that House about seven years ago ; and it was i also his wish to see some arrangement made for a provi sion for the poor, and he must say that he was perfectly ready to concur in a measure for the establishment of Cor porations in Ireland upon a representative system, if an arrangement could be made in the three other Bills. It was also his wish that these subjects should not be brought, into contest in every ses s io n o f P ar li a ment.—(Hear, bear.); He cordially concurred in the propriety of postponing these questions during the present Session of Parliament ; and lie would say if he were next session in the same relative situa tion as that in which he at present stood he should be pre pared to concur with the Noble Viscount in all those sub jects in any reasonable measure for the settlement of these questions.—(Hear, hear.) EDUCATION AND CHARITIES BILL. Lord BROUGHAM said that after what had been: t stated by his Noble Friend and the Noble Duke as to the! - , present state of the business, he had come to the resolution ' of not pressing the Education and Charities Bill, even 0f . . , . that portion to which, as he before stated, he saw no ob-t jection to passing this session. In postponing the Bill''. therefore, it became necessary for him to state the reasons,;. which had induced him to depart from the determination; which be had stated on the former occasion. He had . .I . ' hoped that the House would have proceeded with that part 4. of the Bill which referred to the matter of education, leo-it' ing the other and more important part for future conside- . . ration. He had, however, reflected that the Government g:, would probably abstain from the appointment of Commis -. e sioners until the extent of their duties had been ascer- b,f, tained, and for this reason, therefore, he had now come to. . the determination of postponing the Bill. With respect to education it might be sufficient to say that Prussia and Saxony were far before us. He said this to stimulate the sluggish, and to show the necessity of Parliament passim* some legislative measures on the subject. By this Bill it j? was intended to appoint some officer, called Minister, or*' what name was pleased, to sup er i n t en d the department ()IN public education, and a Board of Commissioners—paid Commissioners—to hold their offices for life, but to be re-E movable, like the Judges, on an address from both Houses ( A of Parliament. By this means, therefore, it would be seenl that no undue influence could be exercised in the educe- tion of the people, and the evil obviated of having a changeable Minister. use Marquis of LANSDOWNE concurred in the judgment of his Noble and Learned Friend in postponing`'` the measure, and nothing could be more. j us t than the oh - . .r servations whieli he had made ; but it would be impo ssible 4L e as the Noble and Learned Lord had stated, for th e Go-. vernment to deal with one proposition without being aware of how far it was the intention of Parliament to comply,. with another object, in certain respects of a totally different,: character. He should be sorry if the Noble and Learned . Lord had thought that the measure was p o etponed on .. accoun t o f any hesitation to affirm the prin ci p le of the Bail as far as related to the subject of education, and as far ash;,. it related to the creation of some State authority to pe e r was a system of education. He had risen to state thatreho..l.see quite prepared to affirm the principle of the measure of hi e Noble and Learned Friend, and that in another cogs ... h ~,e! t s i l , i 3 c ;l l.: itl with he r a ent . t , o t o applythe l e i i x m i: !..:: , l s f i • zealous) on 0 f a c ? o f n;i e d ne i r a oa - -1 ',.-;:;.,:; j vernment. educat:on, und, r the proper and caccessary authority of G 4: ,, t!. The 8.11 was then withdrawn. Y fe‘ t s o te i i t n 6 '-'-'cct Committee app i _ Lordships the Report of the . e Ti.e Earl of SHAFTESBURY had to present to thtecii,;•24 ,~*~~ THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY, JUNE 30, 1837 1'