The Sun. — London, England, 1846-08-13 00:00:00

assuming it to be true, showed that the parties were in a state of great irritation, and that Mr. Williams had used very improper threats, but alone it was not suffi cient to found a decree. On the 22d July differences re specting some very trivial matters took place between then parties, and on the 24th another conversation en sued, in which Mr. Williams insisted upon his wife re canting the expression " hypocritical fellow." That she declined to do, and he then used words, if Miss Tides well was to be credited, which no one would attempt to justify. According to the same witness, his conduct on that occasion was very outrageous, and he threatened to destroy everything in the house, but it did not appear that any act of personal violence towards his wife was committed. In consequence of that occurrence Mrs. Williams became unwell, and was confined to her bed and room. These circumstances might be material, as showing th e probability of future conduct more intem perate and violent, but did not call for particular inves ti ga tion. The Bth article charged a threat of personal violence on the 10 th of August , and adeclara tion said to be made by Mr. Williams, that he hoped he should be able to keep his bands off his wife. Miss Tideswell deposed that Mr. Williams desired the footboy to bring a bucket of water that minute to throw over his mistress, and that rvas confirmed by Sarah Jacob.. Whether Mr. Williams really in tended to commit the act of violence he threatened was a question which no tribunal could satisfactorily decide, but the inevitable consequence must have been to excite great alarm in the breast of Mrs. Williams, and naturally and justly to occasion apprehension of personal ill-usage. lie (the Learned Judge) was of opinion that that charge was proved. After that occurrence, Mrs. Williams re mained in her bed-room, or Miss Tideswell's, until the 17th of August, when the circumstance took place which ended in her quitting the house. The evidence of Miss Tideswell as to the commencement of the transactions of the 17th of August was not very favourable to Mrs. Williams. It was not very prudent to have a door locked which was to be opened immediately on Mr. Williams knocking, and still less so to renew the former quarrel, by reminding Mr. Williams of his threat to throw the bucket of water ; it savoured rather of resentment than fear. Mrs. Williams quitted the sitting-room and went to the bed-room, which was then locked, but on Mr. Williams coming it was opened, and a scene of abuse and swearing followed. Whether Mr. Williams actually struck his wife, and whether he did so inten tionally, had been matter of much discussion. If Miss Tideswell was to be believed, he grasped her neck with his hands, and she heard a gurgling in her throat. Both their faces were covered with blood. He (the Learned Judge) had no hesitation in saying that, even on the supposition that Mr. Williams in tended the violence for one of the servants, and that Mrs. Williams only incidentally partook of it, there was no thing appearing on the face of the evidence that could justify it. Such deficiency of self-command rendered future personal violence more than probable. Accord. ing to the evidence of Sophia Neale, on interrogatory, there was no violence towards any one; all that hap pened was, that Mrs. Williams slipped off the ottoman, and Mr. Williams tried, but could not succeed, in lifting her up again. The Court could not understand why that witness had not been examined in chief, and from her very limited cross-examination the Court was sub-. stantially deprived of her testimony. Another witness examined was Sarah Jacobs; but he considered her pre sent statement to be deliberate perjury, and her evidence must be blotted out of the case altogether. It was not the law, and never could be, that, because a party produced a witness, they should therefore be bound by it, what ever it might be. Miss Tideswell deposed to her and her aunt going to the window on the 17th of August, and screaming " Murder murder." Whil s t th ey were thus screaming, M r . Williams pulled Mrs. Williams violently away from the window, slammed it down, and, turning round, said to her emit, accompanied with oaths, " I'll give ityou for screaming murder," and he then struck and knocked her down, after which the man-servant John came into the room. The men John had not been examined on either side, and the Court had some right to complain of it. Mr. Williams had given no responsive plea, and examined no witnesses—a very singular course in such a ease. Was Miss Tideswell corroborated as to the main fact, that of personal violence? If the evidence of Thomas Cox, a servant in an adjoining house, and who deposed to seeing the blow from a window, was to be believed, the proof of personal violence, and of the grossest kind, was undeniable. An exceptive allega gation, however, had been pleaded to his evidence, which pleaded that it was impossible he could have seen what he had sworn be did see, from his own house, and the part of the house he described himself to have been in. In such cases it was necessary to show that the witness was perjured. Mr. Cotton, a surveyor of no very great experience, being only 24 years of age, had made a plan of the premises, and sworn that the statement of Cox was in part incorrect ; that it was impossible for him to have seen Mrs. Williams on the floor or Mr. Williams strike her. On comparing the two statements, however, it appeared to him (the Learned Judge), that there was only an apparent contradiction between them. He was of opinion that Cex was not in the slightest degree dis credited ; but when Mr. Hardwick's evidence was taken into consideration, there was really no longer room for doubt. It appeared to him (Dr. Lushington), therefore, that the acts of violence charged against Mr. Williams on the 17th of August were established by the evidence of two witnesses, both entitled to credit. These acts of violence were of so gross a description that they tell under the definition of legal cruelty in the strictest sense of the term, and they were not justified by any provo cation proved to have been given by Mrs. Williams. Enough was proved to entitle Mrs. Williams to the decree of that Court, separating her from her husband. CONSISTORY COURT OF ROCHESTER, August 11. (Before Dr. LUSUINGTON.) IVEY V. IVEY. This was a suit for a divorce, promoted by Mrs. Ivey against her husband, on the ground of cruelty and adul tery. It appeared that there was a great disparity of aze between the parties, Mrs. Ivey being many years older than her husband, and possessing a handsome for tune settled upon her for her own use. Dr. ADAMS (with whom was Dr. Bayford) submitted that the adultery was fully proved. It was true that up to a certain period their had been condonation on the part of the wife, but the adultery, he argued, had been revived by subsequent acts, and also by acts of cruelty. Dr. DEANE rested the defence on the alleged condo nation of the adultery, and the impossibility of bringing the cruelty cha rge d w i t hi n t h e l ega l definition of that term. The Learned JUDGE intimated to Dr. Adams that he considered the adultery proved, but he was of opinion that the acts of cruelty were not sufficient to justify him in pronouncing for a divorce on that ground. Dr. ADAMS admitted that the acts of cruelty per se were nut sufficient to entitle his party to her prayer. He would therefore abandon that part of the case. The Learned JUDGE then signed the sentence of sepa ration on the ground of adultery only. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, August 11. (Before Mr. Commissioner GOULBURN.) FOX V. COLLINGWOOD. This was a summons under the sth and 6th Viet., for the purpose of getting the defendant declared bank rupt unless ho paid the sum claimed. An objection was taken to the heading of the sum mons, which was simply Court of Bankruptcy. The COURT was at first of opinion that that was suf ficient, as all the other courts were district courts ; but ultimately held, that under the 24th rule, made by the Lord Chancellor, it was necessary that it should be stated that it was the Court of Bankruptcy, London. His HONOUR also decided on a second objection, that the initials, or the abbreviation of the name of the plain tiff in his signature, was not sufficient, although it fol lowed, " I the undersigned William Fox." The summons was therefore discharged. CONTEMPT OF COURT.—AISTROP V. SOLOMON. In this case the defendant, who had been summoned under the Small Debts Act, was committed for contempt of Court. The summons was originally returnable, on the Ist inst., but the defendant, on being served, said he was " too busy to attend the Court.', The Commis sioner suggested that a notice should be given, so that he might not be ignorant of the consequence of not at tending ; but, on receiving it, the same answer was re ceived. The Learned COMMISSIONER, therefore, ordered the commitment to be enforced. SECONDARIES' COURT, August 12. (Before Mr. Secondary Pops En.) ASSAULT. -- NEYLAND V. PE.ARsoN. This was an action to recover damages for an assault. Mr. 12.5 land appeared for the plaintiff. and Dlr. Sergeant Jones for the defendant, who suffered judgment to go by default. The facts of the case, as elicited from the plaintiff's wit nesses, were these : —The plaintiff is a dealer in Bass's Indian ales, and the defendant a licensed victualler, keeping the Mitre, in Chancery-lane. On the 6th of July last the plaintiff took six dozen of ale, and charged it at six shillings a dozen, which the defendant objected to, and said that it was agreed when the dozen was sent as a sample that it should be only ss. 6d. per dozen, and he would not pay any more, and plaintiff might take it away again, on which plaintiff called him a d—d humbug, &c., kc., and said he would not do so. Defendant told him not to repeat the offensive words, which, however, he 'did, and defendant then went round the corner and struck him in the face. It was act pretended that the injury was severe, but plaintiff went to an attorney a short distance away, who immediately sent a letter requiring com pensation for the injury and an apology, also payment for the beer, an d t h e next day writs were issued. Defendant paid for the beer, but determined to take the opinion of the jury as to the assault. Mr. Sergeant -JONES contended, that although the de fendant could not justify the assault, yet that, if the jUry sanctioned such conduct by their verdict, they would be encouraging actions of this kind, and no tradesman would be safe from insults and imposition. The jury retired for two hours, and at three o'clock gave 51. damages. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. OXFORD CIRCUIT.— Gloucester, Aug. 11. No case of any interest whatever occurred in the Civil Court to• day. The indictment of the Queen against Robinson, clerk, is appointed to be taken to-morrow morning. CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice MAULE.) Eliza Cross, aged 24, was placed at the bar to take her trial on an indictment and a coroner's inquisition charging her with the murder of ber newly-born illegi timate female child, on the 17th of May last. Mr. Skinner appeared for the prosecution, the prisoner was defended by Mr. Symons. The prisoner, who was an ironer to a washerwoman named Mrs. Rowley, sl e pt on the night in question with her fellow-servant, Sarah Young, who had long sus pected her of being pregnant, but had received denials to every question she had put to her on the subject. The prisoner, on the morning of the day in question, got up 6 , 4weeia four end fire o'clock, and went down stain, and - The prisoner, though unmarried, had previously had two children, one of which was still alive, to which she testified her mistress was very kind, and which she supported. The defence was, that the child having been born suddenly, as the prisoner was going down stairs to the kitchen, Lad received the injuries causing death by its mother accidentally stepping on its head. After an address to the jury by Mr. Symons, and an able summing up by the Learned Judge, The jury found the prisoner Guilty of concealment of the birth only. His LORDSHIP sentenced the prisoner to imprisonment for three months. NORTHERN ClRCUlT.—Appleby, Aug. 10. The assizes for the county of Westmoreland commenced here to-day; Mr. Justice Wightman presiding on the civil side, and Mr. Justice Cresswell in the Crown Court. Five causes are entered for trial. The calendar contains the names of thirteen prisoners, the greater number of whom are charged with petty thefts. The charge of rape against four men engaged on the Lancaster and Car lisle Railway has caused a great deal of excitement in the county, as well on account of the respectability of the persons who suffered from the outrage, as of the peculiarly brutal circumstances by which it was accom panied. (Before Mr. Justice CaxsswEnn.) Thomas Burrows, aged 18, Geo,ge Lees, aged 18, John Smith, aged 21, and William Smith, aged 19, were in dicted for a rape on the person of Jane Dover, at Shap, on the 19th of April last. Mr. Matthews and Mr. James conducted the prose cution. The prisoners were defended by Mr. Ramshay. The prisoners were striking specimens of the class to which they belong, strong robust youths, but evidently utterly ignorant, and who conducted themselves through out with apparently a total indifference to their position. Mr. MATTHEWS opened the case, and called the fol lowing witnesses : Jane Dover, a delicate-looking girl, about seventeen years of age, stated that she was the daughter of a farmer at Scarside, near Shap. He is now dead, but the farm is still kept by her mother. Her brother Mat thew and her sister Elizabeth lived in the house. Her sister Mary lived at Haeltinthorpe Hall, and on Sunday, the 19th of April last, had come over on a visit to her mother. The witness and her sister Elizabeth accompa nied her part of the wa;. home, along a footpath leading from a place called Bampton Grange, past Scarside, to wards the high road leading from Shap to Penrith. On reaching the high road they parted, the witness and her sister Elizabeth returning home by the footpath. From Thrinaby Grange, where they left Mary, there was no house in the neighbourhood of the path except their own home, which was about a mile distant. When within about a quarter of a mile from home they met four men, whom they identified as the prisoner!. In consequence of an elevation in the ground, the witness and her sister did not see them until they were within thirty yards, and on their coming up the young woman went off the footpath to let them pass. Two of the men, the two Smiths. seized hold of Elizabeth. Jane at tempted to run away, but was caught by Burrows and Lees. She was thrown down upon the ground, and Burrows attempted to perpetrate the offence with which he now stood charged. He called to Lees to hold her feet, and succeeded, notwithstanding her screams and struggles, in accomplishing his object. Lees then com mitted the same offence, being in a similar way assisted by Burrows. During this time she was aware that her sister was struggling with the other two men, but one of them now left her and came to the witness. He also perpetrated the crime. Both the young women were detained in this struggle for upwards of an hour and a half ; and before the witness finally succeeded in get ting away from her assailants, one of them, she could not tell which, repeated the offence. Another of them then took her up and carried her towards a plantation, at some distance from the path, where he again attempted to violate her person. While he was struggling with her her sister, who had finally got away from those by whom she had been attacked, came up to her on her hands and knees, on which the man left the witness Jane and went to her sister. Jane then got to her feet, and ran home, where she gave the alarm to her brother. He imme diately mounted a horse and rode off to the spot, where he found Elizabeth lying insensible ; she also having been repeatedly outraged in the same way as her sister. Both were in a dreadful state when they reached home, their clothes torn to pieces, their faces bleeding from blows inflicted upon them by the hands of their assail ants, and their persons severely bruised in the long and desperate struggle which they had maintained. Early the next morning the police went in search of the pri soners, who had all been together drinking at a public house at Bampton on the evening in question, and had been seen very shortly before the time when this out rage must have taken place proceeding from Bampton along a path leading to the spot, and in its immediate I neighbourhood. It was found that at a very early hour on the Monday morning they had left the " barrack," a cluster of temporary huts in which they lived, and they were traced step by step across the county of Westmore land, and finally into Durham, where they were taken into custody near Hartlepool. On examining their persons it was found that Burrows had but one of his braces on. It was of rather a remarkable pattern, and corresponded precisely with one which was found in the field the morning after the outrage. The spot, it was stated by the witnesses, was so 1 trodden in the struggle that it was some weeks before it was again covered with grass as before, and it was strewed with portions of the dress of the young women, crushed fragments of their bonnets, torn gloves, and broken combs. According to the testimony of the medical men Jane Dover had suffered extreme violence from the persons by whom she had been assailed. The particulars of the injuries sustained by her sister Etiaabeth (whose case was the subject of another indictment) did not transpire on this trial ; but they were understood to be of a most serious kind. The prisoners were convicted. His LORDSHIP, in passing sentence, said they had been convicted of a most aggravated offence, under circum stances of such atrocity as reflected the greatest disgrace on the country in which they were born. When men at their early age were so brutified any observation would, as to them, be thrown away. There was no possibility of exciting in such minds either regret or shame, and he (the Learned Judge) had never seen four men apparently more lost, more shameless, more dead to every manly feeling. As an example to others, however, it was ne cessary to refer to the fate which awaited them. They were about to leave a free country fora state of perpetual servitude, without intermission of their toil, without wages, without any reward but that daily bread which would enable them to continue their daily labour, to spend the remainder of their lives in suffering and de gradation. The Learned Judge concluded by content:. mg the prisoners to transportation for life. ESTERN Aug.lo. CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice ERLE.) John Gaudfield and Thomas Gaudfield were indicted for breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Ann Champion, at Curry Rival, on the 18th of January, and stealing therefrom upwards of 601. Mr. Edwards was counsel for the prosecution, and Mr. Stone and Mr. Saunders defended tie prisoners. It appeared that on the 16th of January Mrs. Champion had about 60/ in her house ' • she had placed it in her pocket-book, and th en locked it up in a box, which she kept in her bed-room. On the following day (Sunday) she saw that the money was all safe. On the Illonday morning, about seven o'clock, she discovered that the lock of the box had been broken, and that her money was gone. The prisoner John Gaudfield lived in a cottage belonging to the prosecutrix, and almost ad joining her house, and shortly before this his brother, Thomas Gaudfield, had come on a visit to him. Thomas Gaudfield had a house at Glastonbury, and William Russell occupied two rooms in that house. In the month of January Thomas Gaudfield was absent from his house for a fortnight, but returned one evening ac companied by his brother John. On the 22d of January, about 11 o'clock at night, both the prisoners came to Thomas Gaudaeld's house and called up Russell, who opened the door for them:; they then appeared to be very much agitated. They went into one of the rooms, and shortly afterwards Russell heard them quarrelling, and one of them said, "Don't curse and swear so ; we have broken into Mrs. Champion's house, every d— farthing, and we m ust hid e iatn tilld taken a the n anoise ay is over." Russell, upon hearing this, went down stairs and saw them counting money on the table. They remained in the house about a quarter of an hour, and then went out, the prisoner, Thomas, hav ing a small box under his arm. Russell told this to a woman with whom he cohabited, named Mary Ann Rus sell, but he desired her not to mention it to a soul, be cause he had heard one of the prisoners say that he would murder any one who split upon them. Mary Arn Russell corroborated the statement of the former witness as to what he had told her. She had named it to twenty people. She had never been in gaol for thieving ; but she had had a bad husband who had sent her for some cloth which had been stolen, and she was taken up for " finding" the cloth. She was tried, and bentonced to six months' imprisonment. Her husband had been trans ported two years since. The prisoners had been seen with large sums of money in their possession shortly after the robbery. The jury found the prisoners Guilty, and they were sentenced to be transported for ten years. Susanna Joan Morris, a respectably attired woman, was indicted for stealing ten pairs of gloves and other articles, the property of Mr. Dight Gay, at Exeter. Mr. Phinn conducted the prosecution. and Mr. Stone defended the prisoner. The prosecutor is a tradesman in Exeter. The pri soner lived at North Curry, where she kept a school, and Mr. Gay's child was boarded and educated by her at 2/. 10s. a quarter. In July the prisoner went on a visit to Mr. and Mrs. Gay at Exeter. At that time Mr. and Mrs. Gay were on a visit to Miss Yarslake, at the vil lage of Ede, near Exeter. The prisoner accordingly wen‘ there, and after staying a couple of days alto wei4 after staying there some time returned into her room and threw herself on the bed, and after lying there about twenty minutes, went down stairs again, and while below called out, inquiring whether .Sarah Young was dressing to come down, to which the latter replied that she would be down in a few minutes. Sarah Young when dressed went down, and observing some stains of blood on the kitchen pavement, made inquiries of the prisoner as to what had occurred, as also did her mis tress when the fact was communicated to her. On being questioned subsequently, she admitted that she had mis carried and thrown the child into the privy, where, how ever, nothing was found on a search. Afterwards, in the course of the same day, the body of a child was found in the prisoner's room, wrapped in a gown near her bed. It was proved that the child was full-grown. The surgeon described the injuries as of a most grievous nature, and stated on examinatio❑ that this must have resulted from extreme violence. On cross examination, however, he said that a person treading accidentally on the head of a newly born child might possibly have inflicted them. to Mr. Gay's shop, where she remained three days, and then the prisoner made a communication to Mr. Gay, the import of which was that Mrs. Gay had been un faithful to her husband, and she named a gentleman to him. Mr. Gay immediately went to Ede, where his wife was staying, and there he found the gentleman who had been named to him by the prisoner, and he instantly commenced an attack upon him, which ended in a con flict, and Mr. Gay was rather severely punished, and was not able to attend to his business for some days. Mrs. Gay returned to her shop in a day or two after this, and then saw the prisoner in her shop, in the act of turning over different goods. She also observed that the prisoner's luggage wee packed up. An altercation took place about what the prisoner had stated, and the prisoner was told that the sooner she left the house the better. Mr. Gay did not pay the prisoner what was due to her, but said he would send her a post• office order for the amount. The prisoner then left. On the 20th of July, in consequence of Mr. Gay missing some gloves and other articles, he went to the house of the prisoner, at North Curry, and he there found a carpet bag, containing several articles belonging to him. On the cross-examination of Mrs. Gay, it appeared that she had sent and received several letters from the gentle man who had been named, and that she had also received presents from him. For the prisoner, it was urged that she had merely taken these things as a security for the money that was due to her, and witnesses were called who spoke of her in the higheA terms. The ju - ry found the prisoner Not Guilty, and stated that there was not the slightest imputation on her character. Edward Williams and Abraham Michael were in dicted for a burglary in the dwelling-house of the Rev. Robert Haynes, at Coomb Hay, and stealing a large quantity of money. Mr. Stone was counsel for the prosecution, and Mr. Saunders and Mr. Cole for the prisoners. On the morning of the 9th of May it was found that the prosecutor's house had been broken into and the money in question stolen. The prisoners were drinking together the whole of the previous day. Some con stables had information given them, and they took both the prisoners into custody at Williams's house ; and, upon searching them, many 5/. notes were found upon them, together with a gold watch, chain, and seals, which the prosecutor identified as belonging to him. Williams immediately started, but was followed and detained, and in his pocket the constable found a jemmy. The house of Williams was searched, and a centrebit was :ound, which fitted an aperture in the prosecutor's study shutter. Afirhael pleaded Guilty, and the jury returned a ver dict of Guilty against the other prisoner, and they were both sentenced to be transported for life. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. Numerous complaints have been lately made against persons to whom bills have been entrusted by individuals desirous of obtaining cash fur them. One case, which came before Aldtrman Gibbs three times, and which shows the tenacity with which a certain class of bill discounters grasp what they have not the least claim to, will serve as a sample, and, probably, operate as a warning. On Thursslay last John Singer Sydserff was brought up in the custody of a policeman, charged with having stolen the acceptance of air. Lewis, one of the Society of Friends, for 127/. It appeared that Mr. Lewis gave the bill to a Mr. Dixon to get discounted. Mr. Dixon applied to the prisoner, who said he could get it cashed after having seen a copy of it, and obtained the original upon the un demanding that he would produce the amount or the bill itself within a certain time. The prisoner laughed at the repeated demands made by Mr. Dixon, who, of course, informed the acceptor of the difficulties in which he was placed. Mr. Lewis, apprehensive that a danger ous use might be made of the instrument, gave the pri soner into custody. The prisoner voluntarily entered into his recognizances to appear next day, to answer the accusation, Alderman Gibbs advising him, at the same time, to settle the business by delivering up the bill to the person from he had received it, there not being the shadow of excuse for its detention. On the following day Sydserff appeared before the Alderman, accompanied by Mr. Woolfe, of the offices of Mr. Flower, to make his defence. Mr. Lewis having represented the particulars, Alderman GIBBS asked whether the prisoner had re ceived instructions in writing to get the bill discounted? Mr. Lewis replied in the negative, but a receipt, signed by the prisoner, for the bill was produced; and it was argued that the receipt was quite argument enough of the obligation of the prisoner to return it. Alderman GIBBS said that on no point could a felony be proved against the prisoner ; but if the acceptor had taken care to deliver written instructions with the bill when he gave it to be discounted, it would be in the power of the magistrate to commit the party detain;:ng it for misdemeanour. Mr. Woolfe said that his client had beer apprehended as a common thief in the street and was very iguomi niousl% treated. Alderman GIBBS—Why does he not give the man his bill ? Mr. Woolfe—My client does not know Mr. Lewis, the acceptor, at all. The only person who had any deal ing with him is Mr. Dixon, and how would ho be justi fied in handing over the bill to a stranger ? It is most monstrous that a person should be seize d upon in the street as a robber by a man whom he never saw before, and in a case in which there is not the slightest testi mony that an offence has been committed. Alderman Glens asked whether Mr. Dixon, who had handed the bill to the prisoner to get it discounted, was present, and was informed that he was not in the jus tice- room. Alderman GIBBS read the section of the Act which directs that written instructions are necessary in cases where persons are employed to get bills discounted, and said he regretted that he could render no assistance to the prosecutor, who must bring an action as the only means of procuring restitution. He again advised the prisoner to restore the bill to the owner The prisoner was then, very much to his satisfaction, discharged, but made no promise. On Monday last, however, Mr. Dixon, who had be en accidentally absent on Saturday, an d who considered that he was called upon to make every effort in his power to get back the bill, caused Sydserff to be appre hended in the county of Middlesex, on the supposition that the magistrates at Wosship-street Police Court would find out some Act of Parliament better adapted to his taste. He was, however, mistaken. The Worship street magistrates sent the prisoner back to the Man sion -house, where Mr. Dixon, in: tend of Mr. Lewis, ap peared as prosecutor. Alderman GIBBS again heard the evidence, which presented no new feature, and again recommended that the bill should be given up to the owner. Mr. Woolfe, for the prisoner, said that his client had committed no offence, and called upon the Alderman to discharge him. Alderman GIBBS (to the prosecutor)—You have no remedy except by action. The omission of the written instructions to the person intrusted with the bill has put you out of Court. I discharge the prisoner for want of evidence. The prisoner was then, evidently to the regret of the respectable persons present, discharged. TRAVELLING THROUGH THE CITY.—The Lord Mayor has for a considerable length of time dedicated the in terval between nine and twelve o'clock on every Satur day to the hearing of cases of complaint against omni bus drivers and conductors, and his Lordship's activity in causing the removal of obstructions has obtained for him the warm thanks of the inhabitants of the leading streets in his extensive district. His Lordship some times hears from fifty to seventy complaints on the ap pointed day. The plan adopted by his Lordship has been exceed ingly efficacious. Instead of fining the violators of the law the largest amount of penalty, he inflicts no higher fine than 10s., with the alternative of 14 days' imprison ment for each offence. That sentence subjects a delin • quent to very low diet, so that if he refuse to pay in pocket, he must pay dearly in person, and he cannot upon leaving prison boast of a triumph over the Beak. The offender, on the contrary, upon whom a large penalty is inflicted, with the alternative of a longer period of confinement, is not subjected to the pinching diet which is measured out to the former, so that he willingly ac cepts the imprisonment, at the end of which he resumes his occupation, after having escaped the pecuniary inflic tion, and been supported at the expense of the City. In most of the former instances the masters pay the ten shillings for the misbehaviour of the servants, and com pel them to pay back the amount by instalments, so that the efficacy of the law is by such experiments most completely tested. BOW-STREET. Mrs. Blewitt, the widow of Blewitt, the unfortunate victim of the youth Graham's carelessness, appeared to-day to make an application to Mr. Henry, with respect to the money sub scribed for the benefit of her child, which, it will be remem bered, she endeavoured to obtain some part of a few days atter the conclusion of the case at this Court. She stated that Mr. Le Raux, a Catholic priest, and a person of consi derable influence and authority at the Catholic school in Clarendon-square, Somers-town, had undertaken to get the cbild into that establishment, on payment of certain fees of trifling amount. She was, therefore, anxious to have the money, or some part of it, given up to Mr. Le Raux. She herself intended, as soon as she could get the child provided for, to go to service. If she failed, however, in getting her ' child into this school she would be obliged to have recourse to parochial assistance. _ - . Mr. HENRY was perfectly willing to give up any part of the money, if he was convinced that it would be for the benefit of the child alone. He feared, however, that the ap plicant only wanted to get possession of the money herself. However, if Mr. Le Raux would call at the office and satisfy him that the money would be applied to the uses of the child alone, he would be willing to give it up; or if the applicant should determine upon applying to the parish, he might perhaps give it up to the parochial authorities fur the purpose of placing the child at their school. Mrs. Brewitt preferred having the child at the Catholic school where she " would know tlee child would be taught as she should wish," and it was therefore settled that Mr. Le Raux should be requested to app ear h ere on Saturday. _ [Mr. Le Raul is the superior of this school; he is cele • brated in the neighbourhood for his benevolence and un ostentatious charity, and is universally esteemed and re spected by the inhabitants, more especially of the poorer classes, of the vicinity.] LAMBETH. Ann Lynch, who had been remanded on Saturday last, on a charge of having savagely assaulted a female, named Mary Ann Perkins, of Marlborough-house, Peckham, in the month of February last, was placed at the bar before Mr. Elliott for further examination. Mr. Cochrane, the chairman, and Mr. Jones, the secretary, of the " Poor Man's Guardian Society," were present, with Mr. Humphreys, the solitor, to prosecute ; and Mr. Games was in attendance to watch the proceedings on behalf of Mr. Richards, the proprietor of Marlborough-house, where the assault had been committed. Mr. Humphreys, who attended on, behalf of the "Poor Man's Guardian Society," which society had humanely taken up the case, stated the particulars of the murderous assault, and called the following witnesses to prove it. Maria Dennis deposed that in the month of February last, she was an inmate of Marlborough• house, Peckham, and also a nurse of the casual ward. Early in the morning of a day, the date of which she could not re collect, she heard violent screams of " murder" proceed from the ward, and upon going to see what was the matter she saw the prisoner violently ill-using another woman. The prisoner had her hands entangled in the hair of the young woman, and pulling it different ways. She also knocked her head against a wall, and pulled a handful of hair out of her head, so that there was a large place bare, and she bled profusely. The prisoner threatened to do for the young woman, and the latter appeared anxious to get out of the place so as to be out of her reach. Mr. Humphreys—Now look at this young woman, and tell me whether she is the person who was ill.used in the violent manner you have described by the pri soner. Witness—l cannot say she is the same person; if it is, she is very much altered, but I have some recollec tion of having seen that perso n b e f ore. The witness further stated that many trifling robberies had been committed on the paupers about the time of the assault, and that she understood that the cause of the prisoner's attack on the young woman was her being detected in stealing some money. John Dennis, the husband of the last witness, de posed that he had much difficulty in disengaging the hands of the prisoner from the hair of the other woman, Mr. Humphreys—Look at this woman, and tell me whether she is the person who was ill-useCe Witness—l cannot swear she is the same person. Clerk—You did so when a warrant to apprehend the prisoner had been applied for. Mr. ELLIOTT—Is she the same person to the best of your belief ? Witness—To the best of my belief she is. The witness proceeded to say that the young woman was very much injured, and so violent were the threats of the prisoner, and the terror of the other woman was so great, that he was glad to get rid of her, so he gave her some dry bread, and let her out at the gate. Mr. Humphreys—And kept the prisoner in. Wit ness—Yes, sir. Mr. Humphreys—So that the person who was treated in this savage manner you turned out, and kept the assaulting party in. Mr. ELLIOTT—Did you send for the police? Witness —No, sir. Mr. ELLIOTT—WeII, I mast say, that it was a very odd and extraordinary proceeding. Were there no per sons in charge of this place at the time ? Witness— Yes, sir; Mr. Richards was in the house at the time,. but not present, and I did not consult him or any body else before I let the young woman out. Mary Ann Perkins, the complainant, was next called and sworn.—The unfortunate woman presented a truly wretch( d appearance. She had a large bald patch on the front part of her head, and it is very doubtful whether she will ever recover the effects of the pri soner's brutality. She deposed that she was the wife of Thomas Perkins, who had deserted her. She was in the habit of going to Marlborough house occasionally to sleep, and was there in the beginning of February. She (witness), prisoner, and a third woman slept in the same bed one night, t end on the following morning when they were getting up, the prisoner accused her of stealing lid. from another pauper in the ward, and instantly com menced an attack upon her. She seized her by the hair of the front part of her head, and knocked the back of her head repeatedly against the wall. She also drew a quantity of hair from the front part of her head, so as to occasion the bald places then perceptible. While the prisoner was ill-using her Mrs. Dennis came into the ward and called out to her to let her (witness) go, and not kill her outright. The pri soner was so furious that it was with much difficulty she could be released from her grasp, but as soon as she was she was anxious to avoid her fury, and asked the man Dennis to let her out of the place, which she did. She might have been to Marlborough-house as many as three or four times in five years, and had always to the time she spoke of received all necessary protection. Upon leaving Marlborough -house she was bleeding very much, and very faint and ill, but she made the best of her way to Guy's Hospital, where she remained about five weeks. She left before she was at all recovered, andsubsequently went into the Westminster Hospital, where she re mained for some time. She did not give her real name at either of those hospitals, nor did she tell the real cause of her injuries to the rne , lical men who attended her. There was nothing whatever the matter with her up to the time when she was ill-used by the prisoner ; but since then she had suffered much from her head. and was not well yet. In conclusion, the witness said she did not wish to do anything to hurt the prisoner ill as she had behaved to her. Evidence was here given of the apprehension of the prisoner, and the discovery of the complainant, who was for a long time supposed to be dead. It appeared that the "Poor Man's Guardian Society" had oTered two guineas for her production, and Mr. Richards two guineas more ; and this circumstance being made known to the complainant herself, she went to Marlborough house and gave herself up to Mr. Richards. Mr. Humphreys, after a few remarks, said he would leave the case in his Worship's hands, to deal with it as he might deem proper. If it was his Worship's opinion that it should go to the sessions, the respectable society he had the honour to represent would do its duty and prosecute ; or if it should be the wish of Mr. Games, on behalf of Mr. Richards, to prosecute the pri soner, then the society would withdraw from the case altogether. Mi.. Games said he had received no instructions in the matter, and being there merely to watch the case he would not think of undertaking a prosecution. Mr. Humphreys observed that this being the case, he wished to say that, if necessary, the society would pro secute, but the ease was altogether in the hands of his Worship. Mr. ELLIOTT observed, that if the case was sent for trial, there were one or two other witnesses who would be required to complete it, and be should therefore re mand the prisoner for another week. Mr. Humphreys thought it necessary that the attend ance of the surgeon at the hospital, who had first seen her, should be procured, as it would be desirable that the extent of the poor woman's injuries should be known. Mr. ELLIOTT did not think it necessary that a medical witness should be bound over in the case, and here the matter dropped. The unfortunate complainant, who had been accommo. dated with a chair wt3ile giving her evidence, was so weak as to require to be assisted out of court. RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS. BRISTOL, ArorsT 11. STOCK ExmaarmE.—The sales are—Bristol and Exeter, New, 10% —Bristol and Gloucester, 51% —Caledonian, 1 1 4%--Cornwall, 1 Eastern Counties, 23% Great Western, Quarter Shares, 21 % Mid! tnd, New, 37%—Newcastle and Berwick, 2 7%—North Stafford shire, 3% p.—Oxford, Worcester, and Wolverhampton, 8 4. MANCHESTER, AUGUST it. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The sales are--Ambergate, Nottingham, &c., dts.—Blackburn, Darwen, and Bolton, New, 4 dis.—Blackburn and Preston, 8 p.—Boston, Stamford, and Birmingham, 4 dis.— Eastern Counties, York Extension, 1 9-16 p.—East Lancashire, 8% p.—Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding Jun c ti on, % dis. —Glasgow and Dumfries, % dis.— Grand Union, 11-16 di s .—G reat Grimsby and Sheffield, Huddersfield and Man c h es t er Rail faz, and way and Canal, I 4 p.-- Ditto, Extension, par—Leeds and Thirsk, Bradford,2dis.—D it 2 to 4 , Quarter cp. _ Shares, dia.—Hudd ers fi e ld , Hali -44 dis.—Leicester and Bedford, 3¢ dls.—Liverpool and Bury, New Shares, 1% p.—Liverpool, Ormskirk, and Prest on , 3 1.1 6 p.—Liver pool, Buxton, and Matlock, hester,andSutlP°rt dis.--London and Y or k, ' P.—Manchester and o d l Preston,.-3iaii stc Birmingham, Quarters (A), 1036 p. — Ditto, ditto (II), 10% p. —Ditto, ditto (C), p.—Manchester and Leeds, Fifths, 94 c. p.—Ditto, Extension, 2% p.—Manchester and Southampton, 3¢ dis.—North British, 39—North Eastern, 1% dls.—North Staffordshire, 3% p.— North Western, 1% p.—Nottingham and Mansfield, p.—Oldham Districts, 34 dis.—Preston and Wyre, Halves (A), p.—Ditto, ditto (B), 34 p.—Sheffield, Leek, and Crewe, I Is. 6d. dis.— Sheffield and Lincolnshire Junction, 3-16 dis. — Sheffield and Manchester, I 1 I —Ditto, Quarters, No 1,:,4 p.—Ditto, No. 2, 14 p.—Ditto, No. 3, 3 16 p.—Shrewsbury and Birmingham, ti 7.2 P.—Shronshire Union, 11-16 dis.—South-Eastern and Dover, Halves, No. 4, 11-16 p.—South Mid land, 11-16 p.—Trent Valley, Midland, and Grand Junction, % West Lancashire Coast, 18s dis.—West Riding Union, 2% p. LEEDS, AUGUST 11. Sirocx EXCHANGE.—The sales art—Eastern Counties, York Ex tension, 345. p.—Huddersfield and Manchester, 1% p.—Ditto, Ex tensions, rar—Huddersfield and Sheffield, 64 c. p.—Leeds and Bradford, 42 p.—Leeds and Thirsk, dis. -Ditto, New, 4/. Is. dis.—Manchester and Leeds, Filth Shares, 838 p.—Ditto, Extensions, 2% p.—Newcastle and Darlington Junction Extensions, 10!.‘ p.— North British, Carlisle Branch, 395. 6d. p.—York and North Mid land, East and West Riding, IS p.—Ambergate, Nottingham, and Boston, 1% dis.—Clitheroe Junction, 18s dis.—Glasgow and Boat fries, 19s. dis.—Lancashire and North Yorkshire, 10s. dis.—Lanca shire, Yorkshire, and North-Eastern, 28s. 6d. dis.—Leicest er an d Bedford, 10s. dis.—Liverpool, Ormskirk, and Preston, 3% p.—Mal ton and Drlflield Junction, Its. 6d. p.—Manchester, Buxton, Mat lock, and Midland, 16S. p.--Manchester and Southampton, 10s. dig. —North Staffordshire, 3% p.--North Western, 6d. p.—Sheffield and Lincoln, dis.—Shropshire Union, % dis.—South Midland, Ih. p. —South and Midland Junction, 17s. 6d. dis.--West Riding Union, U. l7s.—Yorkshire and Glasgow Union, 2 dis, SHEFFIELD, AUGUST 11. STOCK ExciirAtiox.—The sales are —Eastern Counties, York Exten sion, 1% p.—Midland, 40/. Shares, 14% p.—Ditto, Sheffield and Rotherham, 343 —Caledonian, 5 dis.—Grimsby and Sheffield Exten sion,BCouxalt°n'Leek, Potteries, Railway, 133. dis.—Ditto, Quarter Sh a res, 10s. dia.—L on d on and Wind sor, I6s. 6d. dis.—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland, 17s, dis.—Man chestwr and Lincoln Union and Canal, 185.—North Western, 3s. p.— S t e t fli er e i l es d and a L c i n r c e o w l y e t s , ll 25. .6d. ou d t ish.—South 11s. dis. _North British, 36% c.—Ditto, 625. 9d.—Blaekburn. Dar -11• incolnshire, %—Grand STOCK Excissisoz.—Th iliTh e sales Half Shares, 13—Ditto, Carlisle Branch, 6d.—Derby Da:rdb y ßolton, aints — or A ouingbhe,rg i a s Aa t s e r l . ,coitingham , and Boston, 335. Union, 15s.—Leicester and B e df or d, 9s. 9d. — Leicester and Tam worth, 325. —Liverpool, Orm s ki r k, and Preston, 3 % P.—L on d on and York, 214 —Londol and Manchester (Re m), %—Malton an d Driffield Junction, 13s. p.—M anc h es t e r, Buxton, and Matlock, y. p.-- North Western, 245. 6d.—North St a ffordshire, 3 p. — South Midland, 15s. 6d. p.— Shrewsb ur y an d Bi rm i ng ham. 3—Shr opshire Union, 1W —West Riding Union, 4% —Yorkshire and Glasgow Union, 12s. YORK, AUGUST 11. STock EXCHANOL.—The sales are.—Eastern Counties, York Exten sion, 2%—Leicester, Tamworth, &c., 1/. 10.—London and York, 21. 4s.—Newc true and Berwick, 27—Newcas tle and Darlington, N ew, 111. Is. 9d.—North British, Carlisle Extension , 31. 3s.—Nor th Staf fordshire, 51. 4s.—North W es t ern, 11. 6s.—Yor k and Carli sle , York and North Midl an d, East and West Bidi n g Extension, 13%. THE ACCIDENT TO SIR CHARLES WETHERELL.— We understand that the valet was dispatched to London to procure the attendance of Lady 'Wetherell, who arrived last night by the mail train. We need not say that the unfortu nate gentlemen met with every possible attention and kind nos at Preston-hall which the sympathy and hospitality of the kind-hearted owner or the skill a the medical gentleman scold suggest. The latest accounts from Preston-hall are of a very unfavourable nature. Sir Cherie?, who is labouring under concussion of the brain, was unable to speak, and the wsmorasrtdreensutlotssese an refeaersetda.teThheehLaedarnpuerdchassd, Gentleman and w h a a s d i b n ee te n nc t i ! ing to return to town by Gravesend. —Maidstone Journal of yesterday. FIRE IN TINE SOUTHWARK-DRIDGE-ROAD.-011 TUe2- day forenoon, between ten and eleven o'clock, a fire broke out upon the premises in the occup a t io n of Mr. James Har court, a corn-dealer, carrying on business in Norfolk-street, Southwark-bridge -road. It ccmmenced in a building termed a stove, in which a large number of cane ribs were under rgiobisn gw were ee consumed e o ri f daybi‘lnugt. two-thirds re men and the men em ployed on th e p rem i ses succeeded, after some trouble. in ex tinguishing the flames, but not before several g ross of cane of the reeks in the building destroyed, and the roof pulled off. The outbreak was caused b a sack having been left hanging over a coke OtOVe. Ur. Uarcourt WWI tiLlialiared. BANK RETURNS. 36,268 Birmingham Bank, Birmingham—Taylor and Lloyds Bradtord Old Bank, Bradford, Yorkshire—H and A. Harris Brecon Old Bank, Brecon—Wilkins and Co 13ridport Bank, Bridport—S. and W. E. Gundry Brighton Union Bank, Brighton—Hall, West, and Borrer ••• • • Burlington and Driffield Bank, Burlington— Harding., Smith, and Co Bury St. Edmunds Bank, Bury St. Edmunds— .J. Worlledge and Co. Bromsgrove Bank and Stourbridge and Broms grove Bank, Bromagrove—Rufford, Biggs, and Co. Cambridge Bank, Cambridge—Mortlock and Sons Cambridge and Cambridgeshire Bank, Cam bridge—Messrs. Forsters Canterbury Bank, Canterbury—Hammond and Co Carmarthen Bank, Carmarthen—Morris and Sons Chertsey Bank, Chertsey—Messrs. La Coste Colchester Bank, Colchester—Round, Green, and Co. Colchester and Essex Bank, Witham and Essex Bank, and Hadleigh Bank, Suffolk, Colchester —Mills, Bawtree, and Co Cornish Bank, Truro—Tweedy and Co ...... Coventry Bank, Coventry—Little and Wood cock 39,623 11,647 68,209 24,909 30,276 City Bank, Exeter—Milford and Co Craven Bank, Settle—Birkbecks and Co Chris tchurch Bank, C h ristchurch—Tice, Welsh, and Co Cardiff Bank, CardatF—Towgood and Co Chepstow Old Bank, Chepstow Bank, Mon mouth Old Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Chepstow—Bromage, Snead, and Co. Derby Bank, Derby—Messrs. Evans Derby Bank, Derby—Smith and Co. Derby Old Bank and Scarsdale and High Peak Bank, Derby—Crompton, Newton, and Co Devizes and Wiltshire Bank, Devizes—Hughes, Locke, and Co Diss Bank, Diss—Oakes, Finchana, and Co Doncaster Bank, Doncaster—Leatham, Tew, and Co. Doncaster Bank and Retford Bank, Doncaster — Cook and Co. Dover Union Bank, Dover—Latham. and Co Darlington Bank, Durham Bank, and Stockton on-Tees Bank, Darlington—Backhouse, and Co Devonport Bank, Devonport—Hodge and Nor man Dorchester Old Bank and Dorsetshire Bank, ' Dorchester—Williams and Co. East Cornwall Bank, Liskeard—Robins, Foster, and Co. East Riding Bank, Beverley—Bower, Hutton, and Co. 44,880 b:ssex Bank and Bishops Stortford Bank, Chelmsford—Walford. and Co. 50,235 Exeter Bank, Exeter—Sanders and Co • 32,047 Fakenham Bank, Fakenham—Gurneys, Birk beck, and Co. Farringdon Bank and Bank of \Vantage, Far ringdon—Barnes and Medley 8,189 Farnham Bank, Farnham—Messrs. Knight 13,285 Faversham Bank, Faversham—Hilton and Co 5,294 Godalming Bank, Godalming—Mellersh and Keen . Grantham Bank, Grantham—Kewney and King 15,882 Guildford Bank, Guildford—Messrs. Haydon c9O Grantham Bank, Grantbam—Hardy and Co 28,101 Hastings Old Bank, Hastings—Smith, Hilder, and Co. 31,113 Hereford City and County Bank, Hereford— Matthews and Co. Hertfordshire Bank and Ware Bank, Ware— S. Adams and Co. 15,832 Hull Bank and Kingston-upon-Hull Bank, Hull ' —Smith, Brothers, and Co. Huntingdon Town and County Bank, Hunting don—Rust and Veasey Harwich Bank, Harwich—Cox, Cobbold, and Co 5,815 Hemel Hempstead Bank, Hemel Hempstead— Smith, and Whittingstall 22,601 lloniton Bank, Honiton—Flood and Co. Hertfordshire, Hitchen Bank, Hitchen—Sharples and Co. 35,935 Hereford, Ross, and Archenfield Bank, and Ross and Archenfield Bank, Hereford—Morgan, , Hoskins mid Co.. _ 26,415 Ipswich Bank, Ipswich—Bacon and Co. Ipswich and Needham Market Bank, Suffolk, Hadleigh Bank, Manningtree and Mistley Bank, and Woodbridge Bank, Ipswich— Alexanders aid Co. Kentish Bank, Maidstone—Mercer, Randall, and Mercer Kingtou and Radnorshire Bank, Kington—J Davies and Co 22,876 Knighton Bank, Knighton—J. Davies and Co 7,432 Knaresborough Old Bank and Ripon Old Bank, Knaresborough—Terry and Co 20,003 Kendal Bank, Kendal—Wakefield, Crewdson, and Co.. 73,700 44,222 Kettering Bank, Kettering—Gotch and Sons 8,645 Lane i~^d Staffordshire Bank, Lane End—C y and Son Leeds Bank, Leeds—Beckett and Co 51,657 Leeds Union Bank, Leeds—W.Williams, Brown, and C Leek and Staffordshire Bank, and Leek and Congleton Bank,Leek—Fowler,Gaunt. and Co. 3.635 Leicester Bank, Leicester—Pagets and Kirby 24,419 Lowe, Old Bank, Lewes—Molineux and Co 41.130 LichFeld Bank, Lichfield—Palmier and Green 19,146 Lincoin Bank, Lincoln—Smith and Co 77,991 L;z.n.lovery Bank and Llandilo Bank, Llando very —David Jones and Co. Loue:hborough Bank, Loughb oroug h—Middl e- , t. and Cradock Lymington Bank, Lymington---C. and S. St Barbe Lynn Regis and Lincolnshire Bank, Lynn Rt•gis —Gurneys and Co. 40,895 Lynn Regis and Norfolk Bank, Lynn Regis— Massey and Co. Macclesfield Bank, Macclesfield—Brocklehurst and Co 12,0, . Manningtree Bank,Manningtree—Nunn and Co 5,972 Marlborough Bank, Marlborough and Wilts Old Bank, Marlborough Old Bank, Marl borough Old Bank and Hungerford Bank, and Hungerford Bank, Marlborough—Tanner and Pinckney 13,827 Marlborough and North Wiltshire New Bank, Marlborough—Ward, Merriman, and Hillier 11,639 Merionethshire Bank, Dolgelly—Jones and Williams Miners' Bank, Truro—Willyams and Co 17,409 Monmouthshire Agricultural and Commercial Bank, Aber,gavenny—Baileys and Co 27,071 Monmouth Old Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, Chepstow Bank, Chepstow Old Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Monmouth —Bromage and Snead 15,460 Monmouthshire Newport Old Bank, Newport —W. Williams and Sons 7,949 Newark Bank, Newark—Godfreys and Hutton 20,865 Newark and Sleaford Bank, and Sleaford and Newark Bank, Newark—Handley, Peacock, and Co Newbury Bank, Newbury—Bunny and Slocock 35,045 Newmarket Bank, Newmarket—Eaton, Ham mond, and Son Norfolk and Suffolk Bank, Diss—Taylor and Dyson Norwich Crown Bank, Norwich—Harveys and 6,003 13,708 2,95 . 41,600 Hudsons Norwich and Norfolk Bank, Norwich —Gur neys and Co 7l 601 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire B an k , N ot- , tingham—Hart, Fellows, and Co .... . Nuneaton Bank, Nuneaton—Craddeoek and Co 5,643 Naval Bank, Plymouth—Harris, Mudge, and Co 25,325 New Sarum Bank, Sarum—Hetley, Everett, and 107 Nottingham Bank, N o tti ng h am —S mith and Co l4, 28,078 Oswestry Bank and Oswestry ()Id Bank, Os weFtry—Croxon and Co . ............. 16,830 Oxford Bank, O x f or d—j . and R. Morr ... ell ...... 7 Oxford Old B an k, Oxford—Robinson, Parsons, 12,57 and Thompson... ................................... 31,033 Old Bank Tonbridge, Tonbridge axd Tonbridge Weil , ' Old Bank, Tonbridge and Tonbridge Wells and S evenoa k s B an k , Tonbridge— Beeciaiug sad .. . ........................ . 9,950 • 8,621 (From the London gazette of Tuesday.) An Account, pursuant to the Act seventh and eighth Victoria, cap. 32, of the Average Amount of Bank Notes, of the several Banks of Issue in England and Wales, in Circulation during the Week ending Satur day, the Ist day of August, 1846 : Average PRIVATE BANKS. Amount. Abingdon Bank, Abingdon—linapp and Co 24,746 Andover Bank, Andover—Heath and go 16,445 Ashford Batik, Ashford—Jemmitt and Pomfret 11,191 Aylsha.n Bank, Aylsham—R. and E. Copeman 5,225 Aylesbury Old Bank, Aylesbury—Bickford and Hunt . 41,665 Baldock Bank and Baldock and Biggleswade 1317.. k, Baldock—Wells, Hogg, and Lindsell... 31,663 Barnstaple Bank, Barnstaple—Drake and Co. 12,445 Basingstoke and Odiham Bank, Basingstoke-- Cole, Seymour, and Co. Bedford Bank, Bedford—T. Barnard Bedford and Bedfordshire Bank, Bedford— Trapp, Halfhead, and Co. Rew dley Bank, Bewdley—Nichols, Baker, and Crane Bieester and Oxfordshire Bank and Oxford Bank, Bicester—Tubb, Wootten, and Co. oirmingham Bank, Birmingham—Attwoods, Spooner, and Co 23,742 Birmingham and Warwickshire Bank, Birming ham— Lewis, Moilliett, and Co 17,662 Bland ford Bank, Blandford—Bastard and Oak Boston Bank, Boston—Garfit and Co 61,266 Boston Bank, Boston—Gee and Co 8,153 Bridg - vftter Bank, Bridgwater—E. &J. Sea!ey 7,697 Bristol Bank, Bristol—Miles, Harford, and Co. 40,682 Broseley and Bridgnorth, and Bridgnorth and Broseley Bank, Broseley—Messrs. Pritchard 22,146 Buckingham Bank, Buckingham—Bartlett, Parrott, and Co. Bury and Suffolk Bank, Sudbury Bank, Market Bank, Bury—Oakes, Bevan, and Co .... 75,486 13ant:ury Bank, Banbury—Gillett and Tawney. 31,992 Banbury Old Bank, Banbury—Messrs. Cobb... 45,417 Batn City Bank, Bath—Moger and Son Bedfordshire Leighton Buzzard Bank, Leighton Buzzard—Bassett and Grant .. 8,315 3,749 8,79 6,177 5,995 4,895 2,794 26,457 6,835 22,832 2,19 8,533 9,775 0,102 2,836 9,465 6,806 22,057 10,056 26,360 5,155 45,293 3,590 25,882 5,822 6,282 6,370 Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton- Good riche and Holyoake. Worcester Bank, Worcester-Farley, Lavender, and Co. 12,526 Worcester Old Bank and Tewkesbury Old Bank, Worcester-Berwick, Lechmere, and Co 85,939 Worcestershire Bank ? Kidderminster-Farley and Turner Whitby Bank, Whitby-Frankland and Wil kinson Walsall Old Bank, Walsall-Charles Foster and Sons Warminster and Wiltshire Bank, Warminster- Everett and Co. Wrexham Bank, Wrexham-J. and S. Kenrick 2,018 Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton- Messrs. Fryer Yarmouth and Suffolk Bank, and Halesworth and Suffolk Bank, Yarmouth-Gurney, Birkbeik, and Co. Yarmouth, Norfolk, and Suffolk Bank, Great Yarmouth-Sir E. K. Lacon, Bart., and Co 9,668 Yeovil Old Bank, Yeovil-E. and J. Batten ... 9,318 York Bank, York-Swarm, Clough, and Co 44,282 JOINT-STOCK BANKS. Bank of Westmoreland, Kendal Barnsley Banking Company, Barnsley Bradford Banking Company, Bradford 49,166 13ilston District Banking Company, Wolver hampton Bank of Whitehaven, Whitehaven Bradford Commercial Banking Company, Brad ford Burton, Uttcaeter, and Staffordshire Union Banking Company, Burton-upon-Trent Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Banking Company, Chesterfield Cumberland Union Banking Company, Work ington . Cheltenham and Gloucestershire Banking Com pany, Cheltenham Coventry and Warwickshire Banking Company, Coventry Coventry Union Banking Company, Coventry 12,367 County of Gloucester Banking Company, Chel tenham Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company Carlisle 22,340 Carlisle City and District Bank, Carlisle 21,267 Dudley and West Bromwich .'3anking Company, Dudley Derby and Derbyshire Banking Company. Derby 18,195 Darlington District Joint-Stock Banking Com pany, Darlington . 23,036 East of England Bank, Norwich Gloucestershire Banking Company, Gloucester l 4 -,211 Halifax Joint-Stock Bank, Halifax 17,468 Huddersfield Banking Company, Huddersfield 35,942 Hull Banking Company, Hull .. . 24,732 Halifax Commercial Banking Company, Halifax 13,725 Halifax and Huddersfield Union Banking Com pAtiy, Halifax 41,603 Flelston Banking Company, Helston 1,474 Herefordshire Banking Company, Hereford 20,514 Knaresborough and Claro Banking Company, Knaresborough 23,392 Kingsbridge Joint-Stock Bank, Kingsbridge 3,944 Lancaster Banking Company, Lancaster 57,131 Leeds Banking Company, Leeds Leicestershire Banking Company, Leicester Lincoln and Lindsey Banking Company, Lincoln 47,397 Leamingto t Priors and Warwickshire Banking Cocnpanv, Leamington Priors Leeds and West Riding Banking Company, Leeds.. 11,463 Leeds Commercial Banking Company, Leeds 11,378 Ludlow and Tenbury Bank, Ludlow 8,424 Moore and Robinson's Nottinghamshire Bank ing Company, Nottingham... Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Banking Company, Nottingham Newcastle, Shields, and Sunderland Union Joint- Stock Banking Company, Newcastle 71,250 National Provincial Bank of England, Birming ham, Head-office, 112, Bishopsgate-street, London 404,176 ------------ 52,590 North Wilts Banking Company, Mea ksham Northam p p t t :) , i n is a h h i i r r e e Ü B n a l o n n k i ß r i g a n k c , o N m o p rt i n h y am , m , North t o o r n t . h . - 74,402 ampton North a nd South Wales Bank, Liverpool 50,379 Pares's Leic3stcrshire Banking Company, Lei- 4 cester 9,515 Saddleworth Banking Company, Saddleworth... 3,695 Sheffield Banking Company, 5heffie1d........,,,. 34,475 Stamford, Spalding, and Boston Banking Com pany, Stamford. Stuckey's Banking Company, B r i sto l S omerset- 44,877 shire Bank, and Somersetshire Bank, Lang port Shropshir e B an ki ng Company, Shiffnall 16 Stourbridge an d Kidd erm i nster Banking Com pany, Stourbridge .................. . Sheffield and llalh,,mshiro Banking Company, Sheffield 22,419 Sheffield and Rotherham Joint• Stock Banking Company, Sl-.4lioid Swaledale and Wensleydale Banking Company, Richmond 41,155 Stockton and Durham County Banking Com pany, Stockton Storey and Thomas's Banking Company, Shaftesbury Sheffield and Betfercl Bank, Sheffield Suffolk Bankin , Company, Ipswich . Wolverhampton amd Staffordshire Banking Com pany, Wolverhampton 35,518 Wakefield and Barnsley Union Bank, Whitehaven Joint Stock Banking Company, 28 845 Whitehaven . Wakefield 12,865 Warwick and .......... 32,261. ton Banking Company, Leamington Buk,Bnatol. West of England and South Wales District Bame 9,778 961 Aver Oxfordshire Wit ne y B an k Witney—Williamsa,ge Amotat Clinch, and Co 10,173 Pease's Old Bank, Hull, the Hull Old Bank and Beverley Bank, Hull—Pease and Co 45,70$ Penzance Bank, Penzance—Batten and Co 9,853 '.i. ) &erborough Bank an d O un dl e B an k , Petek borough—Messrs. Yorke Peterborough Bank, Peterborough —Simpson, White, and Simpson lOl2B Pa:abrokeshire Bank, Haverfordwest—J. and W. Walters 12,409 Penzance Union Bank, Falmouth Bank, and Truro Bank, Penzance--Rickets, Enthoven, and Co 17,790 Reading Bank, Reading—Simonds and Co 37,525 Reading Bank, Reading—Stephens,Blandy, and Co 41,535 Richmond Bank, Richmond —Stapleton and Co 6,315 Ringwood and Poole Bank, and Town and County of Poole Bank, Ringwood—Ledgard • and Sons 11,261 Rochdale Bank, Rochdale—Clement, Royds, and Co Rochester, Chatham, and Strood Bank, Roches ter—Dv and Nicholson Romsey and Hampshire Bank, Romsey—Foot ner and Son Royston Bank, Royston—Fordham and Sons 15,:80 Rugby Bank, Rughy—Butlin and Son 10,756 Rye Bank, Rye—Curteis, Pomfret, and Co 21,119 Reigate and Darking Bank, and Reigate, Croy don, and Darking Bank, Reigate—Nash and Co 13,247 Ross Old Bank, Herefordshire, Ross—Pritchard and Allaw ay Saffron Walden and North Essex Bank, Saffron Walden—Messrs. Gibson Salop Bank, Shrewsbury—Burton, Lloyd, and Co 16,375 Scarborough Old Bank, Scarborough—Woodall and Co 24,215 Shrewsbury and Markel, Drayton Bank, Shrews bury—Adams, Maros, and Co Shrewsbury Old Bank, and Shrewsbury and Ludlow Bank, Shrawsbury--Rocke, Eytons, and Co Sittingbourne and Milton Bank, Sittingbourne —Valiance and Son Southampton Town and County Bank, South ampton —Maddiraln and Son Southwell Bank, Southwell—Wylde and Co. St. Alban's Bank. St. Alban's—J. S. Story 2,902 Salisbury Bank, Salisbury—Messrs. Brodie 20,956 Shaftesbury Bank, Shaftesbury— Brodie and King Southampton and Hampshire Bank, Southamp ton—Atherly sod Fall Stone Bank, Stone—W. Moore Stourbridge Ban Stourbridge Rufford, Wragg, and Co Stafford Old Bank, Stafford—Stevenson and Co Stamford and Rutland Bank, Stamford—Eaton, Cayley, and Co. Stourbridge Old Birth., Stourbridge—Bate and Robins Shrewsbury and Welshpool Bank, Shrewsbury —Beck. Downward, and Co. . St. Alban's and Harts Bank, St. Alban's—Gib son and Stuart Taunton Bank, Taunton—Messrs. Badcock Tavistock Bank, Tavistock—Gill, Rundle, and Co. Thorn bury Bank, Thornbury—Rolph, Yates, and Parslow Tiverton and Devonshire Bank, Tiverton—Duns ford and Barne Thrapston and Kettering Bank, Northampton shire, Thrapston—Yorke and Eland Tring Bank and Chesham Bank, Tring—But cher and Son Towcester Old Bank, Towcester—J. and S. Percival Union Bank, Cornwall, Helston—Vivian and Co. Uxbridge Old Bank, Uxbridge—Hull, Smith, and Co. Wallingford Bank, Wallingford—Wells and Co. Warwick and Warwickshire Bank, Warwick— Kelynge, Green way, and Co. Wellington Somerset Bank, Wellington—Fox, Brothers West Riding Bank, Wakefield, and Pontefract Bank, Wakefield—Leatham, Tew, and C 0.... Whit by Old Bank, Whitby—Simpson, Chap man, and Co Winchester, Alresford, and Alton Bank, Win chester— Bulpett and C 0.... Winchester and Hampshire Bask, Winchester —Wickham and Co Weymouth Old Bank and Dorchester Bank, Weymouth—Elliott and Pearse Wirkesworth and Ashbourne Derbyshire Bank, Wirkesworth—Arkwright and Co. . 31,067 Wisbech and Lincolnshire. Bank, Wisbech— Gurney and Co. Wiveliscombe Bank, Wiveliscombe—P. and W. Hancock 4,920 9,718 4,159 9,140 6,516 2,009 6,658 21,450 49,134 28,938 22,686 2,621 21,717 35,820 46,611 7,954 21,797 71,852 2,527 6,887 8,567 11,762 33,642 26,065 8,221 0,147 2,700 54,709 78,856 .0,620 5,510 Average Am ount' Wilts and Dorset Banking Company, Salisbury 67, 10 West Riding Union Banking Company, Hud dersfield Whitchurch and Ellesmere Banking Comp an y, Wilitehurch Worcester City and County Banking Company, Worcester. . . , 5, 763 York Union Banking Company, York 68, 909 York City and County Banking Company, York 88,9 0 Yorkshire Banking Company, Leeds P. DEANS, Registrar e f Rank Returns. Stamps and Taxes, August 8, 1846. MARKET NE `VS--(YESTERDAY) CORN EXCHANGE. We have again to report the arrival of a very moderate quantity- of \V heat of home p ro d uce f or our markets, 01110 wise as well as by land carriage and sample; yet the gentr .l quality was good, e s p ec i a ll y t h e new parcels ( which so ldl t prices varying from 46 s t o 56 s per quarter), which fonn a the bulk of the supply on offer tc-day. The weather bel ' somewhat changeabl e , and the attend a n c e o f b uyers good, ta demand for all kindsofEnglish Wheat w as very steady,i fully, but at nothing quotable beyond, Monday's quotation* and a fair clearance was effected. The show of Foreign Wheat was, owing to many of the large importers havii withdrawn thei r samp l es f or t h e present, small. Fi ne qualities were in goo d request at very full prices, but other kinds were m uc h neg l ecte d . The show of B a rley trifling. The best grinding parcels were held at qu ite ss much money. In a ll o th er ki n d s comparatively l i tt le t doing. Although the supply of Malt was limited, the trade was in a very sl ugg i s h state, at Monday's curreri—A e f, The best English feed O a t s move d a l steadily at late ra„, but the foreig n p arce l s on offer commanded very little 014 a. tion. Beans, Peas, and Flour, as last advised. ARRIVALS. Barley. - qrs. English ...• Wheat. • • . 1,070 qrs. Irish .. .... Foreign ...... Oats I Filo, 540 qrs. 870 9,940 I ---, 5,990 ..--• 5,430 I 2,520 Malt, 1,890 are. . _ A ---- WIEXTECR PEX. mar Prime Beef. Mutton, and Lamb commanded a steady at full prices ; otherwise the demand was in a sluggish g l i ta ° , Beef, fain 2s 4d to 3 s 6d ; M utton, 2s 8d to 4s ; Lamb, * to 5s 8d ; Veal, 3s 6d t o 4 s 4d ; and Pork, as 6d to 4s 6d pe ( 81bs by the carcase. THE MURDER AT DAGENHA M" EXAMINATION OF SUSPECTED PERSO N S' ILFORD, T UESDAY E VENING.— T h i s afternoon D ee .. of Flynn, John Hennessy, an d Ell en R ank i n, the fonder whom were describ e d as agricu l tural labourers, were broom up from the Arbour-square station-house of the K police, and were examined at some length before the mob' o f htraa,r,einsgforbetehne concernedßeacontr in eedityhise murderion ofEss o e f x, Ge o o n rg a e charg e ar police-constable of th e above division, o n t h e 30t h last. Octavius M as h e t er , E sq., presided. The follow lag . evidence against the p r i soners was gone into:— Michael Welch, on bei ng sworn, sa i d, I arrived in E ng land nr , from Ireland on the sth o f February last, and hav e To Cl o a f rk j ej to regular place of living. Th e l ast place I worked in was Mr. Giddins, of Cudham, in Kent. On T ues d a y afternoon, i , last I was at w or k h arvest i ng, when the prisoner, Dente Flynn, came into the fi e ld an d got some work to do, the wheat. On the next day !Ellen Rankin and two P e t sons named John an d F e li x S weeny, came and sat b2efid, fire made for the p urpose of cooking food, in the fi e Whilst sitting there, Ell en Rankin said that they (r • and herself) had no necessity for coming out there; that her husband was earning good wages in Lond e ; but having the misfortune of assaulting a policeman in i le th o don, they were forced to quit th e pl ace and go down int o t o country for twelve months. Joh n Sweeny asked h el/ assault occurred, and she ans were d it was all on ac count ete an Irishman who came into a room where they had bed, drinking and was going to sing; that the Englishman t - 6. jetted to it, and a r ow was cause d . S he then said thao,. sergeant came on horseback, and he was struck with a ef and she saw it ; that Dennis Flynn and John nenn o, assaulted another policeman, an d h e was found dead fag field in the morni ng . J o h n S weeny ' remarked that 't ot ,n foolish of her n o t t o k eep t h at a secret. That is all I'- about it. n ot The Magistrate asked the p r i soners i f they desired r" ° ;IP any question to the wit ness , to wh i ch Flynn exclaitneu:oot is all an untruth w h a t h e h as b een stating. lam as itle about this murder as a man in Smithfield." tren t? Hennessy—l wish to ask hi m if h e ever saw me in Welch—Yes, I saw you drunk in the beer-shop, hav t 7 t ee row, and at the barn on th e morn i ng Ellen Rankin Ina" statement about the murdered policeman. Hennessy—Don't go too fast, my lad, or I shall 110 1370 Why, I was t home at Straford at the time. the Welch decl a ared positively that he saw H e nnessy at Smith's Arms, at Cutiharn, in Flynn's com. Hennessy—He is stating that which is pan untrue, 9_ ° ,, e f i r worship ; I never w a s a t Cudham my life, and never 0' this lad in Kent. The female prisoner also denied the statement of the wit' ness both as to what he' swore she had stated in the t oo and also to Hennessy being the man who came to the madu on that day. She persisted in stating that it was.a_ e. called Jemmy Daisey, and not Hennessy, who came there. Hen, _r s ,-;, Flynn admitted that he was acquainted with but denied that such a statement as Welch detailed had '• been made. r to the The Magistrate said it was a very important matte charge prisoners themselves, and also to the public, that the Ir lie b es should be; fully investigated, and he reminded the witness Welch of the obligation of an oath. ken the truth. Welch declared most solemnly that he bad 81P-ec,onrt, Tooley- Felix Sweeny examined—l reside in Ball -court, m t. Giddens, street. I was at work on Wednesday laet. at Cudham ; and in the afternoon I was with Rankin and Flynn, who worked on to be harvesting when Ellen Rankin said she had no occasion row with a police only for beating a policeman, or having a , etbin t f She then said som man, but I cannot say which. the same fa rw eitteing round afi_re t but I aid not pay much attention to her, nor do I recollect about a policeman being found in the field with his head..eo_i saying anything to her in rep,y. Ido not recollect ask' Flynn or Rankin, when they came first to work, where they came from. When Ellen Rankin spoke of the policentgli being in the field with his head off, John Sweeny, my co usillf said it was very foolish to talk of such a think before peopl e : She had better keep it a secret. The boy Welch was prese o at the conversation. Before the conversation took place , ,.,, had not heard of a policem an h av i ng b een murdered. T"" prisoner Hennessy was not th ere , an d I d on ' t th i n k I ev" ,, r saw him before. Police-constable Edwin Horsefall sworn—l am constab._l6, 53 of the R division, and stationed at Woolwich. From i_ a „ formation I received about half-past eight o'clock Saturday evening I went to a lodging-house in High- tr ee .; Woolwich. I requested the person who keeps the la ti o n te til i e call Dennis Flynn, who lived below. She did so, and toe prisoner Flynn came up, closely followed by the fe e '" An prisoner. She endeavoured to pass me and get into street. I stopped her and asked if Flynn was her hu s° , o au 0 and she replied no. I asked her then what her ! i f e ee was, and she said Ellen Rankin. I then asked her knew Flynn, and s h e d en i ed that she did. I as k e d bet a she did not go by the name of Ellen Cotter, which t s „ n er first denied, but afterwards admitted that she did. der tioned them separately, but the women refused to an any questions. I ascertained from Flynn that he had e ilor working at Footscray, and other places; and also that a ..oti o time ago he had been employed on the Eastern C e , u at ioe? Railway, and lived at Stratford. On going to the, s tet oa Flynn inquired, " Who he bad robbed or injured?' a e f his arrival there the inspector told him the na ture ecte d. charge against him, at w hi c h h e appeared much Flynna froln Yesterday after noon I conveyed the prisoner to he Woolwich P o li ce - court to Ar b our-square station, yr, vi stcP said, alluding to the murdered p o li ceman , " Was hA'Sacidech and money gone?" He said that voluntarily, and " WAs lie very much knocked about ?" Flynn—No, I asked you was he much disfigured? ora Horsefall—lt might have been. It was either a' disfigured or knocked about. d a - Police-constable Edwa r d P a l mer, 23 1 R , dep - eyed prehended the female prisoner. On her way to th e i e ddel she asked me what I was going to take her for, S hea 80 eal. she was not going to get into trouble for Flynn. the tell all about it. After they were placed in the ce v , a olcias station, I heard the prisoner Flynn say to the woman "*".; Oa " Keep your mouth shut, and they can't hurt ~I . l 9o , e ere" searching a bag I took from the prisoner Rankin, 1 l e y ar e the two white gloves (odd ones) new produced. such loves as are worn by the police. e, 0 female prisoner said the gloves were given to " female residing at St. Mary's Cray, Kent. Mr. Superintendent Macquard remarked that the 1 3 81 Hennessy was apprehended by a constable, who had,an fer an assault warrant w hi c h h a d b een out against h i. considerable period. e a to The constable, Horsefall, stat e d th a t Flynnt, ini olle t/ him that the prisoner Hennessy w as d own in ,i c with them. ev i ; The Magistrate here in qu i re d if t h ere was any IL "a t ' 8 ' dente? when Mr. Su perintendent Macq uar d state- l atc hed the present m oment t h ere was not, but be had d i t s e Pd their officers in search o f certa i n information, and exPeetheretb,,l arrival at Ilford shortly. If t h e magistrate Wowernand adjourn the p rocee di ngs for a short time, o r I r a be fort prisoners to a future day, f ur th er evidence W Oll but the y coming. s the i r The prisoners here desired to make a state r :, that a ot bing were checked by the Magistrate, who told toter position was a very serious one they had lest they criminate(' themselves. 'Under 100 day. .;med circumstance he felt it his duty to remand them to a future day e IDs (pointing on hearing this, burst into tears ".! 113 / (pointing to the witness Welch), " That boy 13 life away." .—your worship, I as , o and said—your hurt the hair of a 113 Flynn also shed tears. b ed The then remanded for a week, and ti l ed poor hard-working chap that never The prisoners w bee cirsCluYrulls n forth" go at large lie would not be agai n allowed to that Welch was ordered be detained, suspicion bei g coming. ed in ; Mr. Cobden, whose ar r i va l in Paris we reent-°l3avita yesterday'3 impression, i s stated to have received an i don to visit his Majesty Louis Philippe. .yliTllB. On the 3d inst., at Kilbr • lady of Captain Alcock the On the 4th inst well, of a son. P the wife of W. Parsons Esq., f a daughter. shire, . Berger,, at Pontardawe, near Swansea, it s ta ta in Castle, near Bandon, Glamorgan- On the 6th inst~ at ' of a daughter Bromley, •On the 7th inst., in Gloucester-road, Hyde-ruk_gar-e ri IA Mrs. Joseph Bowstead, of a son. s onby , On the 7th inst., at Cosgrove, the Lady Maria Pon of a son. el Ellig' Ireland, On the Bth inst., at Dalston, the wife of Mr. Saran of a daughter Bth . inst., B tett On the inst., at Weedon, the lady of Cap tain of a daughter. -------- ARIED. F W' On the 6th inst., at St M . Jameßs's Church, Piccadilly, S. Luck, hosier, Strand, to Eleanor, eldest daughter ca Bryan, merchant, of Somerset-wharf, DIED. 11t h of At his residence, in Blackfriars'-road, on the August, George Turnbull, Esq., aged 59, most sincerely a gretted by all who had the pleasure of his friendship or quaintance. On the 30th of May last, at Bog o ta, C 1 nel John /Arvin t"Ohriatgheed3so2tit ult., at Nun-green, re cha ° n:rYet de, Esq., aged 84. On the Bth inst., at Norwood, Surrey, Mrs. Nisbett. On the Bth inst., at Briton, Robert Browne, Esc- taw On the 9th inst.,Richard Esq, of the NV• r ri e ' Fryer, sq, Wolverhampton. On the 9th inst., at Remington-gore, Thomas Fr aser Barclay, Esq., aged 24. John Wade, y Strand, Printer, at The Sun Ofti c a, : Printed end Published b ArtfO YOITNG, f ecni ct London NO.lliDl2, strand. in the Pr, of the Savoy, In the County o( Middleses, Tlausida's 13, 1146. 6,757 2.321 28,717 9,80 UN, LONDO , THURSDAY MORNING, AUGUST 13, 1346, N ( h 4t p tiq„,ll °t Tw4! 7 Th, The „got b e '4e 261 ,so ut t o ecc nd rt 14.11,1,11 to kl