The Sun. — London, England, 1846-12-04 00:00:00

RAILWAY INTELLIGENCE. DEPOSITS WITH THE RAILWAY COMMIS SIONERS. Below is an enumeration of the deposits with the Rail way Commissioners and Private Bill-office. It approxi mates as closely as can be ascertained at present to the precise number of lodgments Ambergate, Nottingham, and Boston and Eastern Junction—Aylsham and North Walsham—A.xholme. Bakewell, Chesterfield, and She ffi eld Junc tion —Bar ks and Hants—Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Chesh ire da Bjt• Junction; Deviation and New Branches _e Lancashire, and Cheshire, and Chester and Birke nhead Purchase and Amalgamation —Birmingham and Oxford Junction and Amendment —Birmingham and Oxford Junction, and Birmingham, Wolverhanpto a n n , and Dudl y Str a df o Stourred- Amalgamation—Birmingham , upon-Avon—Birmingham, WWo l v erhampton , arwlckl and Valley Deviation and Branches —Birming ham, Wolver hampton, and Dudley—Blackburn, arwen and Bolton; Amendment and Branches—Blandford and Burton—Boston, Stamford and Birmingham—Braintree and Halstead—Brandling Junction—Brighton and Chi cheater, South Coast and South-Western—Brighton, Lewes, and Tonbridge—Bristol and Poole Harbour— Bristol. and Exeter (Branches); Crediton to Launces ton Extension; Taunton to Castle Cary (Branch) — Buckingham and Brackley Junction, and Oxford and Bletchley Junction Amalgamation. Caledonian (Branches and Extensions): Branch across Clyde ; Edinburgh Station and Branches to Granton; Lease or purchase of Glasgow, Barrhead, and Neilston, and Glasgow Southern Termini; Glasgow, Neilston, and Barrhead purchase—Caledonian, Glasgow, Garnkirk, and Coatbridge—Caledonian and Glasgow, Paisley, and Greenock Amalgamation—Cambridge, St. Neot's, and Bedford Junction—Chard Canal and Railway— Chelmsford and Norwich—Cheltenham and Oxford — Chester and Holyhead Extensions—Chichester and Bognor—Clarence and Leeds and Thirsk Amalgamation —Clarence and York and Newcastle Amalgamation— Colchester and Stour Valley—Colchester, Stour Valley, Sudbury, and Halstead Extensions; lease to Ipswich and Bury St. Edmund's—Cornwall, Amendment of Act amd Deviation—Cornwall and Devon Central and Plymouth —Coventry, Banbury, and Oxford Junction—Coventry, Nuneaton, Birmingham, and Leieester. Derbyshire, Staffordshire, and Worcestershire Junc tion—Direct London and Portsmouth, Amalgamation with South Coast—Direct London and Portsmouth, Brighton and Chichester, South Coast, and South- Western Acts Amendment—Direct Sheffield and Mac clesfield—Dover and Deal—Drayton and Bognor— Duffryn, Llynvi, and Porthcawl, and Llynvi Valley Amalgamation. East Coast—East Indian—East Lancashire : Burnley Connecting Line ; Bury to Manchester Extension ; Cli • theroe, Milton, and Padiham Branches; Deviations and Rawtenstall Coal Branch ; Southport Branch and Preston Extension—East Lincolnshire : Deviation at Boston ; Branch to Great Grimsby and Sheffield ; Louth Navi gation Purchase ; Louth to Lincoln—Eastern Counties (Braiqtree to Halstead) : Cambridge to Bedford ; Cam bridgeN: Royston, and Ware Line ; Enlargement of Stations ; Hertford to Hitchin ; Ilford to Tilbury Fort, &c. ; Maldon, Witham, and Braintree Purchase ; Peter borough and Folkingham ; Purchase or Lease of North Woolwich ; Somersham to Ramsey ; Spalding to New ark, &c. ; Shalford to the Victoria Park, &c. ; Totten ham to Guildford-street ; Wisbeach to Spalding ; Lynn and Ely, Ely and Huntingdon, and Lynn and Dereham, Purchase or Lease—Eastern Counties Coal and Coast ing Dock and Junction Railway—Eastern Union (Ips wich. to IK . opdbridge) Manningtree to Harwich— Eastern, I; and Bury St. Edmund's and Ipswich Amalgamat4an—Eastern Union and Hadleigh Junction (Sale to Eastern Union)—Edinburgh and Glasgow (Amendment of Acts)—Edinburgh, Leith, and Granton —Enfield and Edmonton Extension—Exeter and Ex mouth (Act Amendment)—Exeter, Yeovil, and Dor chester. Falmouth and Helston—Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding Junction. General Terminus and Glasgow Harbour (connecting branch)—Glasgow, Airdrie, and Monklands Junction — Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlisle—Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlise, and Glasgow, Paisley and Ayr (No. 1) Act Amendment—Gloucester and Dean Forest (Construction of Docks at Gloucester)—Gloucester and Hereford and Canal Purchase—Great Indian Peninsula—Great North of India—Great Northern (Hertford Branch)—Branch to Horncastle—Branches to Sleaford ; Deviations be tween London and Grantham; Deviations between Pe terborough, Boston, and Doncaster; Deviations between York and Grantham; Extension to Leeds and Wake field; Isle of Axholme Extension ; Hertford, Hatfield, and St. Alban's Branch; King's Lynn Branch; Pur chase of Ambergate, Nottingham, Boston, and other lines—Great Western (Cheltenham to Oxford) Amend ment and Extensions ' • Branches to Egham, Staines, Brentford, an d Twick enham ; Branch to join West London; Extension to Barks and Hants; from Yeovil to Exeter, with Branches ; Monmouth and Hereford Deviations —Guildford kxtension, and Portsmouth and Farnham. Hartlepool and Stockton Junction—Harwich and Eastern Counties Junction—Herne Bay and Canter bury Junction —Horsham and Chichester—Huddersfield and Manchester (Branch to Aston and Guide Bridge); Deviations ; Deviations and Alterations in Oldham Branch, &e. Ipswich_k_sid Bury St. Edmund's ; Branch to Wood bridge; Extension to Thetford; Extension to Newmarkdt and Ely; Extensions to East Dereham and Aylsham; Stowmarket to Sudbury ; Yarmouth Extension—lpswich and Reedham. Lancaster and Prestos. Junction Amendments—Leeds, Dewsbury and Manchester (Extension to Wakefield); Ossett Branch—Leeds and Thirsk Deviations: Branch to Northallerton and Junction with York and New castles.. Eaglescliff and Shillington Extension; Leeds, Durham, and Newcastle Extension; Harrogate and Pateley Branch; Knaresborough and Boroughbridge Branch—Leeds Central Station—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland Junction—Lincoln and Grantham—Liskeard and Caradon Amendment—Liskeard and Launceston Branch—Liverpool, Crosby, and Southby Branch— Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle-upon-Tyne Acts Amendment Junction—Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle-on-Tyne and Northern Counties Union Amalgamation Llynvi Valley Extension London Bridge Termini General Enlargement—London and Blackwall Improvement—London, Brentford, and Great Western Junction—London General Coasting Dock, cennecting Railway with Eastern Counties—London and NorthsiWestern : Purchase of Showhill Branch and Amendments of Acts, &c.; Lease and Purchase of Huddersfieli and Manchester and Leeds; Dewsbury and Manchester; Birmingham and Lichfield Line; Bescot and Wolverhampton Branch; Ormskirk and Rainford and other Branches; Lime-street Station Extensicn; Branches from Coventry and Nuneaton Line to Mount Pleasant and Victo r i a Collieries, &c.; Kenilworth to Beckswell, and Leamington to Warwick; Branch to Midland at Whitacre; St. Alban's, Luton, and Dun stable Branch ; Newport Pagnel and Wellingborough and Olney - :Branch—London and South Coast and Lon don and South-Western Participation in Portsmouth Direct between Dorking and Portsmouth—London and South coast (Kent Branches) ; Extension to London- bridge ; London-bridge Station Enlargement and Ar rangement—London and South Essex—London and South-Western, and London and South Coast; Confir mation of Agreement relating to Tolls and Stations— London and South-Western Acts Amendment ; Wim bledon and Epsom Branch ; Widening, Stc.; Wimbledon Shoreham Extension—London, Oxford, and Chelten ham, and Branches—London, Salisbury, and Yeovil— London and Southend—Lowestoft, Alteration near Reedham—Lynn and Ely, Ely and Huntingdon, and Lynn and Dereham Amalgamation —Lynn and Ely Ex tensions; Deviation and Lynn Docks. Manchester and Birmingham, and North Stafford shire Junction—Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midland Junction Deviation—Manchester and Leeds (Alterations of Levels) ; Branch to Barnsley, and Extension of Holmfirth Branch ; Branches, Devia tions, Alterations of Levels, &c.—Manchester and Lincoln Union Deviation—Manchester, London, and Birmingham Manchester, Sheffield, and Lincoln. shire ; Branch at Bagsworth ; Junction with Midland ; Louth and East Lincolnshire Branches; Branch to Old ham; Louth and llorncastle and East Lincolnshire Branches—Manchester and Southampton—Manchester and Southport, and Branches Manchester, South Junction, and Altrincham—Manningtree and Methley —Midland, Branch from Maryotfield to Bath, and al teration of Gauge; Cheltenham, Warwick, and Lea mington; Extension from Leicester to Hitchen; Exten sion of Nottingham and Lincoln Branch ; Gloucester and . Stonehouse Juncti on ; L e i cester and Swanningten Widening; Line from Erewash Valley Line to Not tingham and Maryfi e ld Li ne; M as b rough and Norman ton Station Enlargement ; Systoa an d P eter b orough Deviations; Sheffield, Barnsley, Doncaster, and Goole ; Worcester, llereford, and Cheltenham Lines Mold Junction—Monmouthshire, Sale or Lease to Newport, Ab e rgavenny, and Hereford; Amalga ma ti on w i th New. port, Abergavenny, and IfFroford. Newcastle-on-Tyne, Edinburgh, and Glasgow Junc tion—Newcastle and Berwick, Crawlington, Percy Main, and Killingworth, and other Branches—Newcastle and Berwick East Coast Line—Newmarket and Chester ford Extension to Thetford ; to Bury St. Edmunds ; Amendment Acts—Newport, Abergavenny, and Here ford ; Extension to Taff Vale Norfolk, Thetford Branch ; Aylsham Branch ; Yarmouth Extension— Northampton and Banbury North Briti sh Amend ments—North Staffordshire Branches; Churnet Valley and Trent Valley Junction—North-Western Diversions —Northern Counties Union Deviation. Oldham Worcester, and Wol rer ham pton Extension and Amendment. Parkgate and Chester and Birkenhead Junction — Preston and Wyre Extension. Reading, Guildford, and Reigate—Regent's Canal, Paddington and Limehouse Branch—Royston and Hit ehen Amendment, Sale and Lease. Salisbury and Yeovil—Sheffield, Rotherham, Barnsley, Huddersfield, and Goole—Sheffield, Rotherham, and Doncaster Junction—Shrewsbury and Birmingham— Shrewsbury and Chester—,Shropshire Union, to lease to London and North-Western; Shrewsbary to Worcester B ranch —Southampton and Dorchester, Blandford Branch; New Forest Deviation; Weymouth Branch— South Devon Extensions—South -Eastern, Croydon, and Bromle Branche s; M a id stone to Charte r Mid-Kent and 721IceP Toobridge ; Stro u d t o M a id stone; North Kent and in n g '101;Ydon- 1 er G ' Arms J unct i on; North Kent line; Widen . Lon . I nwich li ne ; Enlargement of Termini ; 01(1p Station E nlargement—South Stafford obire—South Wales Deviation Branches and Amend ment--South Yorkshire—Stoekton, Clarence A Hartlepool, and malgamation—Swansea Junction—Swansea Valley and Branches. Taw Vale Deviation and Branche s rnnbridge Wells, E ast G rinstead, and B r ightonendment— Vale of N.eath Branche s and Amtio Junction. Wear Valley and Weardale Valley Amalgamation Rest Cornwall Branches—Wharfdale Amendments— IV 'fits, Somerset, and Weymouth Amendment—Windsor, Btr tines, and South-Western—Windsor—Worcester, Tes abury, and Ludlow. York and Newcastle, Hartlepool and Great North of England and Clarence Purchase Act; Improvements; Wearmouth and Dock Extensions—York and Newcastle, and Newcastle and Berwick Amalgamation—York and North Midland, and Manchester and Leeds; Hull Station and Branches; East Riding Canal Purchase; Harrogate Branch; Beroughbridge and Knaresborough Extension; Knottingly Branch. RAILWAY SHARE MARKETS. BRISTOL, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCHANGE.--The sales are—Bristol and Exeter, 80—Ditto, New, 8 —Birmingham and Oxford Junction. 83j—Great Western, 130—Ditto, New, 7 1 / 2 —Manchester and Leeds Extension, 1% p.—Midland, 126—Ditto (Bristol and Gloucester), 69%—Yorth Staffordshire, 31. 18s. 9d. p. —Shrewsbury and Birmingham, 2% p.—Taff Yale (5 per cent.), par. LIVERPOOL, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The sales are—Eastern Counties, York Extension, 1 3 4 p.—Edinburgh and Glasgow, Halves, 10 p.—Ditto, Quarters, 18 1 ,4 —London and North-Western, i 194—Ditto, Quarters, New, 13% p.—London and Manches ter and Birmingham, Quarters (B), p.—Manchester and Leeds (late Huddersfield and Sheffield), 5 1 4 p.—Ditto, Quar ters, 5 p.—Ditto, Fifths, 6 p.—Ditto, Halves (late Liver pool and Birmingham), 4 p.—Ditto (late Manchester, Bol ton, and Bury), Fifths, 6 p.—Ditto, Extension, 1 1 4 p.—Mid land, 125 1 A—Ditto, 401. Shares, 8% p.—Ditto, New, 4% p. —Newcastle and Berwick, 14 p.—North British, Quarters, ex new, 2 1 4 p.—North Union (A), 221—Sheffield and Manchester, 95—Ditto, Quarters, No. 3, 1 4 dis.—South- Eastern and Dover, 38—Ditto , New, No. 1, 2 3 / 4 p.—York and Newcastle, 38%.—Ditto, Preference, 5 1 4 p.—York and Selby (East and West Riding Extension), Preference, 10 p.— East Lancashire, New, No. 2, 4 p.—Ditto, New, scrip, 38s. p.—Great Grimsby and Sheffield, 3 1 2 dis.—Ditto, Quar ters, 14 dis.—Huddersfield Canal and Railway, 4 3 / 4 p.—Ditto, Extension, Ifs. 3d. p.—Leeds and Dewsbury, 11 3 / 4 p.— Leeds and Thirsk, 1% dis.—Ditto, New, 1 4 p.— Shrews bury, Oswestry, and Chester, 1% dis.—Ambergate and East ern Junction, IA p.—Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Cheshire Junction, 1 3 / 4 p.—Birmingham and Oxford Junction, 6 1 / 2 p. —Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle Junction, par—Mat lock and Midland Junction, VA p.—Newry and Warren point, 2 1 4 p.—North Staffordshire, p.—North-Western, p.—Shrewsbury and Hereford, 6s. ad. dis.—Shrewsbury, Wolverhampton, and South Staffordshire, % p.—Shrewsbury and Birmingham (A), 2% p.—Ditto (B), 21s. 3d. p.—Shrop shire Union Railway and Canal, 3s. 9d dis.—South Staf fordshire Junction, 1 1 / 8 p.—Trent Valley, Midland, and Grand Junction, 1 1 % p.—West Riding Union, 1% p.—Manchester, Midland, and Great Grimsby, 21s. 3d. dis.—Manchester and Southampton, % dis.—Dutch Rhenish X dis. MANCHESTER, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCHANGE.—The sales are—Ambergate, Notting ham, and Boston, 3-16 p.—Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Cheshire Junction, 2 p.—Birmingham and Dudley, WA p.— Birmingham and Oxford Junction, 6%—Blackburn, Cli theroe, &c., 275. dis.—Blackburn, Darwen, and Bolton, par— Chester and Birkenhead, 52 1 / 2 —Churnet and Blythe, I/ dis. —East Lancashire, No. 2, 4 1-16 p.—Ditto, New, Scrip, 2 p. —East Lincolnshire, IA p.—Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding, I s dis.—Goole, Doncaster, &c., p.—Great Grimsby and Sheffield, 3 1 / 2 dis.—Great Northern (late London and York), 1 4 dis.—Huddersfield and Manchester Railway and Canal, 32 3 / 4 —Lancaster and Preston, 10% p.—Leeds and Thirsk, 1 dis. c. all—Ditto, New, N p. c. all—Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle Junction, 1 / 8 dis.—London, Man chester, and Birmingham (C), 6 3 / 4 c. p.—Manchester and Leeds, 27 p.—Ditto, Sixteenth, 8 1 4—Ditto, Extension, 1 5-16 p.—Ditto, Halves (Liverpool and Bury), 4 p.—North Staf fordshire, 4 c. p.—North Union (A), 220 1 A—Ditto (B), 150 1 4—North-Western, 1-16 p.—Oldham Alliance, 38 p.— Sheffield, Rotherham, and Goole, 5 / 8 c. p.—Shrewsbury and Birmingham (A), 2% p.—Shropshire Union, 1-16 dis— South-Eastern and Dover, No. 4, 9-16 c. p.—West Riding Union, 2 p.—Wharfdale (late North-Eastern), % c. dis. LEEDS, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCIIANGE.—The sales are—East Lancashire, 5 1 ,S p.—Ditto, No. I, New, 4% c. p.—Ditto, No. 2 (late Orms kirk, &c.), 5 p.—Ditto, New Scrip 2 1 -/ s p.—Huddersfield and Manchester, 5 1 / 8 c. p.—Huddersfield and Sheffield, 5 p.— Leeds and Bradford, 45 1 / 2 p.—Leeds and Dewsbury, 11 1 ,4 p.—Ditto, Branches (blue), 7% p.—Ditto, Extensions (green), 1 1 / ‘; p.—Leeds and Thirsk, 1 n. dis.—Ditto, New, 11s. 6d. n. p.—Ditto, Preferentiale, 31s. p.—Malton and Drillield Junction, 1 1 / s n. p.—Manchester and Leeds Exten sions, 28s. 6d.—Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Mid land, 245. p.—North British, Thirds, DA p.—Ditto, Quarter Shares (late Carlisle Branch ), 2 1 4 p.—Ditto, Extension (scrip), 21s. 6d. p.—Sheffield, Rotherham, and Goole, 20s. p.—Shrewsbury and Birmingham, 2 1 /, p.—Wharfdale Junc tion, 12s. 6d. dis.—York and Newcastle, Preference, W I p. —York and North Midland, Preference, 10 1 % p.—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland, 10s. dis. new scrip —London and York, Es. 6d. dis.—North-Western, % p.—Northern Coun ties Union, 1% dis.—West Riding Union, 4/. 2s. HULL, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCHANGE. —To-day but a limited amount of business has been done, which is owing to the scarcity of stock which still prevails in the market. The better kinds of stock were much inquired for, and at improved rates. The sales are—North British, Quarters, 3% ex thirds— Ditto, New Quarters, scrip, 21s. 6d. p.—Ditto, Thirds, 2/. 11s. p.—York and Newcastle, New, 5 1 ,4 p.—Malton and Driffield Junction, 18s. • —North Western, 14s. p. SHEFFIELD, DLCILMBER 2. STOCK EXCIIANGE.—The sales are—Ambergate, Notting ham, and Boston, 3s. 6d. p.—Leeds and Thirsk, New, 3 j p. —Manchester and Lincoln Union, 19s 6d. dis.—Manchester, Buxton, Matlock, and Midland, I►% p.—Midland (Sheffield and Rotherham), 3334—North-Western, 12s. p.—Sheffield and Lincoln, 14s. 6d. dis.—West Riding Union, 24 p.—Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland, 14s. 6d. dis. YOUR, DECEMBER 2. STOCK EXCHAN GE. --The sales are-Eastern Counties, York Extension, 3%-Balton and Driffield Junction, 3/. 2s. 1 -North British, Thirds, 3%-Ditto, Quarters, 3% ex new -Ditto, Extension, li. 135.-North-Western, 31. ls.- Sheffield, Rotherham, &c., 4t. Is.-West Riding Union, 41. 3s. 6d.-York and Newcastle, New, 12%-Ditto, Prefer ence, 71. 3s. 9d.-York and North Midland, Preference, 12 1 4. EDI SIBURGII, DECEMBER 1. STOCK EXCILANGE.-The sales are-Aberdeen, 231. 55.- Airdrie and Bathgate, 41. Bs.-Arbroath and Forfar, 281.- Ditto, Halves, 151. 55.-Armagh and Portrusb, 6s. 6d.- Ayr and Galloway, 11. Bs. 6d.-Belfast and County Down, 35.-British and Irish Union, 2/. 35.-Caledonian, 28/. 15s. -Ditto, New, 2/. 45.-Caledonian and Dumbartonshire, 11. 17s. 6d.-Clydesdale Junction, 341.-Cornwall and Devon Central, I/. los.-Deeside Railway, 31.-Direct Northern, 11. 195.-Dundee and Arbroath, 401.-Ditto, New, 281.-Dundee and Perth, 2.51.-Ditto, New, 101.-East Indian Railway, 12s. 3d.-East of Fife, 1/. 155.-Edinburgh and Bathgate, 21. 15s. -Edinburgh and Glasgow, 761.-Ditto, Halves, 211.-Ditto, Quarters, 191.-Edinburgh, Leith, and Granton, 20/. 108.- Ditto, Preference, 21/.-Edinburgh and Northern, 151. 15s. -Ditto, Newport, 4/. 55.-Edinburgh and Perth, 1/. 155.- Glasgow and Ayrshire, 691.-Ditto, New Stock, 381.-Ditto, Quarters, 171. 7s 6d.-Ditto, Halves, 81.-Glasgow, Dum fries, and Carlisle, 51. ls. 6d.-Glasgow and Dundee Junc tion, 1/. 165.-Glasgow and Garnkirk, 411.-Glasgow General Terminus, 11/. 12s. 61.-Glasgow and Greenock, 17 L -Ditto, New Stock, 8/. 55.-Ditto, Preference, 8/. 55.-Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ardrossan, 1/. 18s.-Great North of Scot land, 11. 195.-London, Bristol, and South Wales, 1/. 3s. 61. -London and York, 2/. 7s. 6d.-Ditto, Halves, 1/. 17s. 6d. --Midland and Eastern Counties, 155.-Newcastle and Ber• wick, 34/. 10s.-North British,3sl. 12s. 6d.-Ditto, Halves, 151. IN.-Ditto, Thirds, 3/. 125.-Ditto, Quarters, 31. 9s. 6d. -Ditto, ditto, New, scrip, 11. 12s. 6d.-Ditto, Fifths, 61. lls. 6d.-North Staffordshire Si. 7s. 6d.-North Wales Mineral, 191.-Ditto, New,lol.-SCottish Central, 221.-Scottish Grand Junction, 155.-Scottish Midland, 131. 10s.-Shrewsbury and Hereford, 125.-Shrewsbury, Oswestry, and Chester, 6/. 10s. -Stirling and Dunfermline, 31.-Stirling and Midland, 21. 103.-Strathern Junction, W. 18s.-Wishaw and Coltness, 481. 10s. THE SUN, LONDON, FRIDAY MORNING, DECEMBER 4, 1846, produced was correct, and the charges were those of the I house. _ . _ _ Cross-examined—A bar book was kept by Miss Saunders, the barmaid ; 121. 12s. was charged for the three servants, including the chambermaid. Mr. MONTAGUE CHAMBERS—I am afraid the cham bermaid had little to do, as there was so little sleeping. Mary Knowles, the chambermaid, said the party oc cupied six or seven beds, which they used by turns; some sleeping in the day, and others in the night; when one got up another took his place, and she had to make the beds at unseasonable hours of the day and night. This was the plaintiff's case. Mr. M. CHAMBERS held, on behalf of the de fendant, that he was not liable to pay the demand of the plaintiff, and he should show that the surveyors who used the house were sent there by Mr. Higgins, who had contracted with the company to defray all the expenses of the survey, and those incidental to it. The ordering of the champagne by the defendant, and its ommission from the bill, showed, at his request, that he did not wish it to be confounded with the bill of Mr. Higgins. When the surveyors first went to the house, the defendant was in Staffordshire, so that it could not be held that they were sent by him. The plaintiff himself had admitted that Mr. Higgins was liable; he attended a meeting of his creditors, and claimed the amount of his bill; so that it was quite an afterthought to turn round and demand the amount from the defendant, and first of all he claimed only 671. Bs. 9d., then the amount for which the action was brought. He then called the following witnesses in support of his ease: — Mr. Boyman, the secretary to the railway, examined by Mr. JAMES—He said Mr. Higgins was the engineer of the line, and received about 1,000/. from the com mittee for the purpose of paying the survey and sur veyors. The committee had nothing further to do with the expense of it. The plaintiff called on him on the 3d of December, and stated that Mr. Higgins had informed him that he (Higgins) had enclosed his (the plaintiff's) bill to him for payment. The account was received with a letter from Mr. Higgins, requesting a cheque on account of the expense of the survey, The bill he sub sequently returned to the plaintiff, telling him that Mr. Higgins was the person to look to, as he had contracted to furnish the survey. The plaintiff, in reply to ques tions, stated that Mr. Higgins sent the surveyors to his house, and that the articles charged were supplied to his order and to his account. A few days after the defendants called with the plaintiff and told him (wit ness) that he was very apprehensive that Mr. Higgins would not be able to pay his bill, and hoped that the committee would pay it for him. The bill was given back to him in order that he might make out two sepa rate bills, that the board might know what he had sup plied to the account of Mr. Grey. The whole of the first bill was made out in the name of Higgins ; he made no claim in my presence upon Mr. Grey for the bill. Cross-examined—No authority was given to Mr. Hig gins by the committee to incur tavern bills on their account. Mr. Bickerton, railway agent, of Cannon-row, West minster, deposed to a conversation taking place at Gerard's Hall between a Mr. Hill, the company's solicitor, the plaintiff, and the defendant, in which the defendant offered him 10Z in addition to the 61. lent, and 31. for champagne, to give him a discharge ; but the plaintiff declined to accept it, saying that if he took it where was he to look for the balance of his account. Both Flint and the defendants admitted owing some thing for themselves and their clerks. Mr. Illidge, the defendant's partner, deposed to having been present at a meeting of the creditors of Mr. Higgins, which was held at the Law Institution, Chancery-lane, and the plaintiff claiming 1201. from his estate. Mr. Nichol, an engineering surveyor, living in Duke street, proved sending several persons to the Boar and Castle by Mr. Higgins's order. Murphy, he thought, was one of them, but he did not send him by Mr. Higgins's order. Mr. Wilson and Mr. Gagent, surveyors, gave similar testimony. This was the case for the defence. Mr. Sergeant SHEA, in his reply, explained that the different sums applied for by the plaintiff arose from his being induced by the defendants to believe that Mr. Higgins was liable for part of the ac• count, and that finding he could not get any part of it from either—that, in short, he had been misled, and that the defendant was clearly liable—he now brought the action for the full amount of his claim. He held that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict on the evidence adduced. Mr. Justice ERLE told the jury that they ought to find for the plaintiff if they believed the contract was made between him and the defendants; and for the de fendants, if they believed it was made with Mr. Hig gins. It was for them to say whether there was or was not a reasonable presumption to believe from the evidence, and particularly from the personal conduct of the defendants that he was liable for the refreshments supplied. The jury, after deliberating at eat half an hour, found a verdict for the defendant. BAIL COURT, Dec. 3. THE QUEEN V. ARNOLD. In this case a writ of mandamus had been issued ordering the defendant to register a certain vessel belonging to the Pacific Steam Navigation Company. To this the defendant had demurred, on the ground that the vessel was partly owned by foreigners. Sir F. Thesiger was heard in support of the demurrer, and Mr. Hill in support of the mandamus. The LORD CHIEF JuslacE, in giving judgment, said that the object of the mandamus was to compel an officer in her Majesty's Customs to register a vessel be longing to the Pacific Steam Navigation Company. That was a corporation by charter. It was not attempted to be denied that the corporation was a British one, but the question was whether it was qualified to own British built vessels under the statute 8 and 9 Victoria. It had been stated that several members of the corporation were foreigners, and not British subjects, and consequently the vessels did not belong exclusively to British subjects, required by the sth section of the Act. These persons, as individual members of the corporation, would not be enabled to have privileged vessels registered with their names as the owners, but being only members of one corporate body—a British corporate body—the Court was of opi nion that the presence of some forei g n ers i n th e corpo ration was not a su ffi cient ground to refuse the regis tration, and the mandamus must therefore be made peremptory. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Dec. 3. C R w o hc R ich D a s t, V. o in p R a D r M h A e l a D r fi d T OmE yesterday, was gter, who deposed that the defendantresumed g m T h r s L e a a t w h s h e i r had a dnme had a morning the u g cellar - w ai ter, e b wl y l aar c rd a - so f forty dinner s , an d th a t wl upon every occasion he had wine with them, and a large quantity of wine was also sent to Bolton. street, by his Lordship's orders. John Hunt, who had lived eighteen or nineteen years in the employ of the plaintiff, deposed to th e f ac t o f th e dinners and wine be ing sent to B o lt on street, and also that his Lordship directed one shilling to be paid upon each occasion to the person taking it. He also stated that the lady residing in Bolton -street, whose female servant took in the dinners, gave at Christmas a Christ mas-box of five shillings to the waiter. Mr. Langham deposed . to having rec e i ve d f rom L ord Maidstone an order for six dozen of sherry. Other witnesses were called, who gave evidehce of a similar nature, and it appeared that the dinners were supplied to Bolton-street three years aft er th e p er i e d o f his Lordship taking the d i nners at th e c l u b-h ouse. The case for the plaintiff having been brought to a conclusion, Mr. JAMES addressed the jury on behalf of the defendant in a most eloquent and forcible sp eec h, con tended that his client was not liable to pay in the present action, and that so far from d eserv i ng to experience severe regret, as intimated by his Learned Friend, he was entitled to the greatest credit for having come forward at the head of a number of young noble men to defend the present action, which was only one of a number of similar others. It was admitted by the Learned Counsel for the plaintiff, that the house in question was a gaming -house. According to the rules of the club, persons who played did not pay the subscrip tion, nor was it ever intended that it should be paid ; no application had been made for the subscription during the life time of Crockford. The jury would not be led away by the high sounding names which had yesterday been paraded before them by his Learned Friend. The splendid house which Crockford used significantly to style " his hell," and over which might be inscribed the language of Dante, "Farewell hope to all who enter here," fitted up with all the allurments and fascinations of elegance, was equally a gaming-house in the eye of the law, as any place which was devoid of those extra neous adornments. And if the Duke of Wellington or other noble personages should play at unlawful games in that house, he was in the eye of the law an " evil dis posed person," and was equally guilty with the poor wretch who, at Epsom or at Ascot, staked his last shilling at thimble rig. Lord Maid stone had lost immense sums in that place, and it was as "false as dicers oaths" to say that he did everything there but pay, as the Learned Counsel for the plaintiff had asserted. There could be no doubt at all that this w as a common gam i ng -h ouse , w i t hi n t h e meaning of the Act. The rules of the club stated that the proprietor should find, at his own cost, a cold supper, the choicest win es , an d the choicest fruits of the season, every night. Who then was to pay for this ? why it was clear that, as at the booths at Ascot or at Epsom, where the young and unsuspecting dupes were called in to take a glass of sherry for nothing, the victims of their fell de signs paid it. Ile wou ld therefore l eave t h e case to the jury, trusting to th e i r good sense to return a verdict for the defendant, who had been already nearly ruined by his connexion with the club. The LO RD CHIEF BARON , in summing up to t he j ur y , said, that in his opi n i on the house in question was not a " common garniag-house" under the meani—; of the Act, there being no evidence to prove it, the only evidence going to show that several mem b ers o f the club did at various times play among themselves for a considerable amount, and that the custom existed to a most deplorable extent. The questions for the jury to c onsider were, first, whether th e y were of opin i on t h a t the plaintiff was liable to pay his subscription of ten guineas as his entrance fee, and t en guineas for hi s subscrip . tion for s l e B n 4 t l: o t a h n e d h s o ecuosnedimany,re and whether they were sent ,by his Lordship's orders. l n y, ,Bo Bolton - street , whether t ree the t d a i n n d n e i r f s The jury retired, and after a short consultation, re turned a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount. The Court was crowded to excess during the . trial by so, and wine ewe interest in the result. a number of persons who seemed to take considerable Upon the jury giving in their verdict for the full amount in the above case, The LORD CHIEF BARON said that he thought it a duty to call the attention of the Counsel in the case to returns The verdict was for the full "Punt; but for the very loose manne r i n w hi c h the verdict had been a great number of the items in the bill of demand there was not a tittle of eviderce in cupport they-not: He would, therefore, advise the Counsel upon both sides to strike out from the amount of the verdict such articles for which no evidence had been given. The saint reck lessness appeared in the jury in an undefended case yes terday, where the jury returned a verdict for the full amount, without a particle of evidence in support of the majority of the claims of the plaintiff. The proposition of his Lordship having been acceded to by both parties, the verdict was entered by consent for the reduced sum of 541. 14s. 6d., exclusive of the sum paid into Court. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 3. LEES V. NICHOLSON-SOUTHERN COUNTIES UNION RAILWAY. This was an action brought by Mr. Charles Lee, a surveyor, against Mr. William Nicholson, a gentleman residing in Manchester -street, to recover 1001., being the defendant's proportion of debt, which, it was alleged, as one of the provisional directors of the Southern Coun ties Union Railway, he owed to the plaintiff, who sur veyed the line. The whole bill charged was 3,2501., which had been reduced by the payment of 1,3501. the defendant pleaded not indebted. Mr. Sergeant Byles and ..Ir. Lush appeared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Martin and Mr. Atherton for the defence. Mr. Sergeant BYLES having stated the case, called the following witnesses George Pullit, a clerk in the employ of Mr. Wells, the solicitor to the company, deposed to the receipt of a letter from Mr. Nicholson, accepting his appointment ai one of the provisional directors of the company, and also accepting a number of shares. J. B. Wells, the solicitor, gave evidence as to the origin of the company, and the appointment of a surveyor. The company was first formed by himself and a Mr. Gadsden. They were the company for a short time. Several gentlemen met together at his office, conducted the company's affairs, and issued a prospectus. There was no regular committee of management formed till the 2d of October. Prior to that the surveyor had been arranged with. There were eleven gentlemen present at the meeting. The provisional and management com mittees were then definitively appointed. Mr. Sheriff Chaplin being nominated chairman, and Mr. Alderman Hughes Hughes, Deputy-chairman. Power was agreed to fill up vacancies. Mr. Nicholson gave his assent in writing, before these proceedings, to be one of the provi sional directors. He had nothing to do with the actual engagement of Lees. That was done by Mr. Lucas, another provisional director, some days prior to the first regular meeting. Cross-examined—Mr. Lees, the plaintiff, was witness's brother-in-law, as was also the solicitor who brought the action. In all there was about 250 provisional directors; out of which 100, along with Mr. Nicholson, gave their consent. About 150 paid in their shares. Joseph Lees, a sharebroker, of Manchester, deposed that the firm with which he was connected were share brokers of the company, and that he had showed Mr. Nicholson the prospectus with his name on it. The note produced, with Mr. Nicholson's name written in it, was filled up by witness, but he did not see that gentle man sign it. George Street, el( rk to Mr. Charles Barker, of Bir chen-lane, advertising agent, prod u c e d severa l London and provincial papers, in which the prospectus, with Mr. Nicholson's name, appeared. The secretary, Mr. Gadsden, gave the orders. Mr. Bennett, of Manchester, proved that all the prin cipal papers of the kingdom came to the Manchester Exchange, and that Mr. Nicholson attended there, and that there was every reason to suppose he must have seen his name in the advertisements referred to. Dugald MTarlane, of the Register Office, Produced the registery of the company. The first registration was in the name or Gadsden alone, but, subsequently, the names of a number of provisional directors were regis tered ; among others that of Mr. Nicholson. The names were written all in one hand-writing, that of the secre tary he supposed. lir. Lees was recalled, and deposed to his having been present at the allotment of the shares, and that 100 were set apart for the defendant. It was, he believed, in pursuance of the letter received from the latter. He understood that letters were sent to all parties to whom shares were issued. Mr. Jacobs was at that time pro. tern. secretary, and it would be his business to send the letters. At this time Gadsden had ceased to be secre tary, having been dismissed. George Adam Jacobs said he was acting secretary in November last year. On the Bth of December he sent out the notices of the allotment to the app:icants for shares. They were given to a clerk to be posted. The capital was fixed at 2,500.0001., but out of all the shares issued there was but 1501. paid up. Not one of the provisional directors had paid anything on their shares. Cross-examined—The panic had taken place before this time, but he could not say what the reasons were that caused an allotment of shares under such circum• stances. He was not aware that the provisional board of directors were the real parties who were conducting this prosecution, in order to place all the expenses on the ge neral provisional directors. John Johnson, clerk to the company, proved the post ing of the allotment letters, and among others one to Mr. Nicholson, This being the whole of the case for the plaintiff; Mr. Justice CRESSWELL, on the application of Mr. MARTIN, ordered the plaintiff to be non suited, inas much as there was no evidence as to the responsibility of the defendant. The decision of the Exchequer in " Wyld v. Hopkins" was the ground upon which the ap plication of Mr. Martin was founded. Mr. Sergeant BYLES tendered a bill of exceptions to the ruling of the judges. HUGHES V. RASTRICK. An arrangement was come to in this case, and a verdict entered for the plaintiff by consent. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Dec. 3. (Before Mr. Commissioner Eva/is.) IN RE DONALD MACLEAN, LATE M.P. FOR OXFORD, Mr. LAWRENCE this day applied to his Honour for a further postponement of the hearing in the case of this bankrupt. He read a letter from Mr. Maclean, who is at present residing at Rome, accompanying a medical certificate from his physician, Dr. Carey, attested by the clergyman of the Protestant Church there, that the bankrupt's state of health would not at present allow of his returning to this country, and he (Mr. Lawrence) therefore prayed his Honour for a further postponement for two months. Mr. JORDENSON opposed on behalf of the creditors. There was a large sum involved, not less than 70.0001, and no assets of any consequence to meet it. It was necessary, therefore, that some measures should be taken to command the attendance of the bankrupt. Mr. Commissioner EVANS did not see that any object would be gained by refusing the enlargement of the pe riod for his appearance. Mr. LAWRENCE would undertake that his friend, Mr Jordenson, would exhibit interrogatories, they would be transmitted to Mr. Maclean, and '`answers would be returned to them. Mr. JORDENSON still opposed the postponement of the hearing. The creditors were most anxious to obtain possession of certain properties believed to be in the hands of the bankrupt's friends, and for this purpose the attendance of the bankrupt was necessary. Mr. Commissioner EVANS thought the creditors wei e not likely to be benefited, if by refusing to enlarge the term, the bankrupt were declared a felon. He should, therefore, postpone the further hearing for two months. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION-HOUSE. A young man named Henry Ford, was charged with having committed a burglary in a public-house, into which he had been taken as a pot-boy from charitable motives. On Wednesday morning, at a little after seven, Knight, No. 437 of the City police, saw the prisoner pass along Bread street with a box, of the possession of which he gave so unsatisfactory an account, that it was found necessary to take him before a magistrate. Upon a little inquiry it was ascertained that the fellow had been about a fortnight, employed by the owner of the Castle public-house, in Little Trinity-lane, who, as he was taken in unrecommended and unknown, except for his necessities, did not allow him to sleep in the house, and that having left the house at half-past ten on the night before, to go to his lodgings, he returned, got in at the window, and stole the landlady's work box, which contained some silver and receipts, &c., and was kept at the bar. The prisoner made the old excuse, that he had received the box from some benevolent person in the street, whom he had never seen before. The prisoner was committ.d for tho burB l .l7 "a robbery. THE ROCHESTER OYSTER BEDS.—Burford, a Mem ber of the Rochester Oyster Fishery Associat i o n, n was violated the charged before the Lord Mayor with having associa tion, Act of Parliament by dredging in the beds when he was not entitled so to do. The foreman of th e association, w ho had been ac quainted with th e fi s hery upwards of 50 years, a nd several of the principal members attended; the question being one which interested a great number of poor fami lies in Rochester and its neighbourhood. Mr. Wire appeared as so licitor to t he company, and stated that they had been at infinite pains to establi s h the beds of the oyste rs native in the Medway ; and that by m e mbers had certain app ointed t by the regulations t times for dredging, and that no membe r was allowed to dredge out of turn, so that the benefit was properly felt by the whole number. It had been ascertain e d t h at the defendant, who mus t have been perfectly cogn i sant of so n ecessary a rule, had violated it ; and four bushels of native first-rate oysters were yesterday morning seized by Mr. John Goldham, jun., in Billingsgate Market while on sale in his possession. The LORD MAYOR—The breach of a regulation so necessa ry for the protection of the fishery, is a serious offence, and I am surprised to hear such a charge against a member of the society. There was no proof that the defendant had been seen dredging. The defendant said he had not touched an oyster in the beds, for he knew his turn had passed by, but he had caught them out of the limits, where every one w as allowed to fish o r t o dredge. ' The company could not show that he had been amongst the beds, and he was therefore entitled to a full acquittal. The LORD MAYOR —The Acts of Parliament says distinctly, " that if a person accused of such an offence do not prove satisfactorily to the magistrate that he has possessed himself lawfully of the goods, he is liable to two months' imprisonment, as well as to a penalty of 5/.. It is not necessary for the company to prove anything but what they have proved, that you are in possession of a quantity of the native oysters without having legally dredged in the beds for them. The foreman said, in answer to a question from Mr. Wire, that it was quite impossible for a man to get a large quantity of oysters out of the limits of the beds, although a few were occasionally to be had in the sea or the deep water. Here samples of the oysters found in the possession of the defendant, and of those which were just brought up GLASGOW, DECEMBER 1. STOCK EXCIIANGE.—The sales are—Aberdeen, 18 1 A — Caledonian, New, 435. 61—Caledonian and Dumbartonshire, 38s. 6d.—Clydesdale Junction, 341.—Direct Bombay and Madras, 6s. 9d.—Dundee and Perth, New, 10t —East of Fife, 35s.—East Indian Railway, Ils. 9d.—Edinburgh and Glas gow, Quarters, 18 1 / 2 —Edinburgh and Northern, Newport, 87s.—Glasgow, Kilmarnock, and Ayr, 681.—Ditto, Quarters (5 per cent. guar.), 17% g —Glasgow, Dumfries, and Carlisle, 51. ls.—Glasgow, Airdrie, and Monkland Junction, 40s.— Great Southern of Madras, Bs. 3d.—Manchester and South ampton, 28s. 6d.—.North British, Thirds, 725. 6d.—Ditto, New Quarters (scrip), 31s. 6d.—Scottish Central, 19 1 / 2 Strathern Junction, 78s. THE MURDER BY POISONING. SUDBURY, DEC. I.—ln The Sun of Monday last was a notice of an inquest held on the previous Friday, at Acton, near this town, on the body of John Foster, who was deelared by the verdict of the jury to have been wilfully poisoned by his wife, Catherine Foster, three weeks after marriage. By many it was thought that the evidence was far from being conclusive against the woman, and that it did not warrant the returningof such a verdict. Since then, however, disclosures have been made which tend to strengthen the presumption that the poison was intentionally administered to the deceased by his young wife. The coroner, Mr. Wayman, met the jury yesterday for the purpose of having the usual criminal inquisition document signed by the jury, when the superintendent of police intimated to the Court that the boy Morley, a brother of the accused, who had been examined at the previous investigations, was in posses. sion of more facts in reference to the death of the de ceased than he had stated at the former inquiries. It should be mentioned that at the last meeting of the jury this lad made it appear that his sister only made one dumpling on the night the deceased wes taken ill, of which he ate part with his sister. On the boy being re called, the coroner proceeded to examine him in very pointed terms, and it was elicited from him that on the evening his sister's husband was taken ill she made " two" dumplings. She gave one of them to her hus band, and the other she ate with witness. The one they had between them was a little one, and was made of the rubbings of the pan, of which deceased did not partake. He added that when the deceased came home from work he and his sister had nearly finished their supper. After the deceased was taken ill and had been put to bed. his sister desired him to say that he had ate the same victuals as the h da t h e aa c dt e ;hsetel that d haa h t day was ate s I It ob w ri s a t s hr t ee o a s p s oa l e lmi a es foredh u i s trae : s lp i l s il n t i e ng r o t s h un a cs t h I a t ah e ne h a du d ene s ter t a a us t te e hd d . Neither he nor his sister had any of the dumpling the deceased ate. The deceased asked him to have a piece, but his sister said he should not, and he bad not. The CORONER directed the boy to lee placed under the surveillance of the police of the district, it being evident that he had been tampered with to a considerable eutent. It was with much difficulty, and after great reluctance on the boy's part, that the above important facts were elicited from him. Mary Ann Chivery, a fresh witness, was called. She said she was a single woman, and lived with her grand father at Acton, next door to the house in which the deceased resided. She remembered that on the day after his death, while the surgeons were opening his body, Catherine Foster, the deceased's wife, came into the house and sat down. On coming in she said the doctors were going to open John's body, and she could not bear the thoughts of being within. She asked if she might sit there while they were doing it ? and on being told that she might, sat down on a chair by the fire. After staying some time she observed to witness, "If I had gone to Bury before I married I would not have married him at all." The inquisition was then duly signed, and the jury dismissed. As yet it is difficult to arrive at a motive that could have induced the accused to destroy her hus band. As before stated, she had been married to him only three week exactly on the day of his death. She is not 18 years of age, her appearance is somewhat good looking, but very simple. Her countenance pourtrays not the slightest hardihood, or anything indicating her to be a person likely to commit such a crime. On being informed by the coroner of the verdict of the jury, she Seemed not th e least affected by it, and on leaving the roam mer e ly sa id , " She was sure she did not do it." LAW INTELLIGENCE. PRIVY COUNCIL, Dec. 3. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Connell sat to-day at the Council Chamber, Whitehall. The Lords present were Lord Brougham, the Master of the Rolls (Lord Langdale), the Judge of the Admiralty Court (Dr. Lushington), the Chancellor of the Duchy of Corn wall (the Right Hon. Pemberton Leigh), Sir E. H. East, and Sir E. Ryan. /MIMI RAM AWASTY V. SHEO CIEWIN AWASTY._ The further arguments in this part-heard appeal from the decision of the Supreme Court in Bengal were re sumed and concluded. The appeal arose out of a suit originally instituted in the Provincial Court of Patna by the appellant, suing in forma pauperis, for the recovery of 85,135 sicca rupees, the fourth part or share of real and personal estate, the joint and several property of the respondents, bankers in the town of Shahalead, in the presidency of Bengal, which the appellant claimed as a member of the respondents' family, which he alleged was an undivided Hindoo family. Their LORDSHIPS, at the conclusion of the arguments to-day, gave judgment, dismissing the appeal with costs. REWAN PERSAD V. BIISSIMAT RADRA BEBEE. Mr. C. BULLER. opened this appeal from the decision of the Supreme Court of BQngal, the arguments in which occupied their Lordships the whole day. COURT OF CHANCERY, Dec. 3. The Lord Chancellor sat in the Old Hall, Lincoln's Inn, this day, at ten o'clock. RIGBY V. THE GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. This case, which stood on the paper to be spoke to on the minutes, was, upon the application of Mr. Wood, ordered to stand over to Monday. The LORD CHANCELLOR, after disposing of several short applications, proceeded to hear appeals, with which he was occupied the whole morning. VICE-CHANCERY COURT, Dec. 3. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR OF ENGLAND.) HEATH V. CHADWICK. _ The arguments in this case were resumed and con cluded to-day. The case came before his Honour upon a demurrer put in by the defendant to the plaintiff's bill. His HONOUR, at the conclusion of the arguments, gave judgment, overruling the demurrer. JARROD V. MOOR. The arguments in this case occupied the Court the remainder of the morning. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Dec. 3. A RAILWAY TAVERN EILL.-BASANT V. GREY. This was an action to recover 131/. 18s. 9d., the amount of a tavern bill. The defendant denied his Ha bility beyond the sum of 201., which he had paid into Court. Mr. Sergeant Shea and Mr. Wills were for the plain tiff. Mr. Sergeant SHEA stated the case to the jury. He said the plaintiff, Mr. Thomas Basant, was the landlord of the Boar and Castle Tavern, Oxford-street, and the defendant, Mr. Aden Grey, was a solicitor, and a mem ber of the firm of Messrs. Grey and Illidge, solicitors, of Great Tower-street. Mr. Grey was solicitor to the Derby, Uttoxeter, and Stafford Railway, which was thrown out by the Standing Orders' Committee. The action was brought to recover the sum of 131/. 18s. 9d. for refreshments of all kinds which were supplied to the defendant, and to a large party of clerks and surveyors, of which he had the management, from the 26th of November last until the 15th of December. At eleven o'clock at night, on the 26th of November, several persons came to the house of the plaintiff, and asked for an apartment and accommo dation for the night, representing themselves that night or the next day as connected or employed by the Derby, Uttoxeter, and Stamford Railway Company. They were received, and next day had breakfast, occupied additional rooms, and denied themselves, during the whole of their stay, none of the luxuries and comforts which the house afforded, and as if they had abundance of funds at their command. On the next day the de fendant arrived upon the scene, and brought a number of assistants—namely, surveyors and clerks—with him, and at once assumed, from the way in which he con ducted himself, the management of the party. They occupied four of the best sitting-rooms and six bed rooms, and they breakfasted, and lunched, and dined, and had refreshments at all hours of the day and night. Twenty or thirty visitors came from time to time, who were invited to take refreshments, and the orders for all were) almost given in every instance by the defendant. The party were engaged in preparing the plans of the railway for deposit at the Board of Trade, on the me morable 30th of November. 5/. ss. a day was charged for the apartments, and 21. 2s. a day for ser vants, and it would be shown in evidence that the whole of the charges were perfectly correct, and such as were charged in all taverns, and consumed by persons who got free quarters in the way this party did. The defendant had paid 20/. into Court and would no doubt contend that he was not liable to pay more than this sum, and that the provisional committee were liable and ought to pay it, of whom the plaintiff knew nothing at all. Pro visional committee men who drank none of his wine— who did not sleep in his beds. Of course he did not look to the provisional committee. The defendant was a respectable man, a member of a respectable house, and a solicitor to a railway, but when applied to for the amount he said, " I am only the solicitor to the Com pany, you must get it from the provisional committee." He borrowed 6/. from the plaintiff, and gave him a I 0 U for the amount, which was cautiously worded. It was headed " Derby, Uttoxeter, and Stafford Rail way," and was signed " Aden Grey of the firm of Grey and Ellidge, solicitor to the railway. No doubt he in • tended that the amount of the loan should be covered by the 301. he had paid into court ; but, no doubt, his Lord ship would tell them that if a number of parties went into a tavern and had refreshments, and if one assumed to be the master and manager, and ordered refreshments which were consumed by the party, that he was respon sible, and ought to pay the cost ; that they were all equally liable, but that one person ought to be sued ; and if the defendant considered it was unfair to sue him alone, he must get rid of his sole liability by a plea of abatement, giving the names of the parties who were jointly liable with him, but there could be no doubt that he was the principal of the party, and was clearly liable. The following witnesses were then called : Mr. George Murphy, surveyor, living in the Kent road, deposed that, in November last year, he was em ployed on the Derby, Uttoxeter, and Stafford Railway, and went to the Boar and Castle on Wednesday, the 26th of November, where he was joined by the defendants on the 27th. He came with others, who were clerks and surveyors. With the exception of about ten minutes he was employed with him at the house of the plaintiff until the 30th of November, when the plans were to be de posited at the Board of Trade. The defendant was constantly there superintending the work and giving instructions. The numbers there varied from 15 to 30 during their stay. On the first day only one room w as occupied, but afterwards three rooms and the coffee• room were used. They slept there, and many of them worked all night, and all had re freshments both day and night. Mr. Grey par took of the refreshments, and generally occupied the head of the table. If the party wanted anything they ordered it, but the defendant had the management of the party, and sanctioned all the orders. After return ing from depositing the plans on the 30th of November, which was on Sunday, the defendant stated, in reply to the plaintiff, who made an application to him with re spect to his account, that it should be settled. (The bill was handed to the witness, and he said he believed it was correct, with the exception of one item, namely, 5/. ss. for apartments on the first day they went, but on that day they only occupied one room.) An application was made on Sunday, the 30th, to the defendant by the plaintiff respecting the charge for servants. The plaintiff asked if he should include it in the bill, and the defendant replied in the affirmative, adding, on the plaintiff inquiring the amount he felt disposed to give, that he might charge 21. 2s. a day. By Mr. Justice ERLE—No previous arrangement was made by him with the defendant to meet him at the Boar and Castle. Cross-examined by Mr. M. CHAMBERS—He was sent by Mr. Higgins, the engineer to the company, whose house was full, and he understood the party were sent to the Boar and Castle, to remain until they were re quired. He was one of the four who first went to the plaintiff's house. On seeing him he stated that they had been recommended to the house by Mr. Higgins, and told him they required one private sitting room. Took no plans with him. The ten minutes referred to were devoted to the plans of the Oxford and Western line. On the 27th from four to six surveyors connected with that line came, but those who came first were con netted with the Uttoxeter line, and were in the employ ment of Mr. Higgins. Those engaged on the Oxford and Western remained about one day ; but whilst they remained those connected with both lines enjoyed refreshments in common. Never heard that the de _ _ fendant had anything to do with the Oxfordand Western line. The defendant said if the plans were prepared in time, with the aid of the Oxford and Western men, that he should divide 50/. among them, and treat them to champagne. The wine was ordered, with the consent of Mr. Grey, and it was received, and he (witness) drank part of it. Never heard that the plaintiff made any ob jection to supplying it. The defendant told the plaintiff not to put the champagne in the bill, as he should pay that himself, as he did not wish it to be seen in the bill. The plans were incomplete, and full of errors ; they . were deposited, but the Standing Orders Committee rejected them. Mr. Higgins had become a bankrupt, and had not paid him his claim in full. They had a very good dinner on the Sunday, after depositing the plans, and th a t was th e occasion on which they were treated with the champagne.—(Laughter.) He was paid a certain sum per day by Mr. Iliggins with so much for expenses—eating, drinking, travelling, &c. His engagement terminated on the 30th of November. Re-examined—The room they were shown into was the best in the house, and looked out back and front. The defendant used the room like every one else. The defendant went with the plans to the Board of Trade. Edward Knuttley, examined by Mr. Sergeant Simi. — Became a waiter at the Boar and Castle on the 29th of November, the defendant and about ten other persons dined on Sunday, the defendant occupying the chair. The defendant gave him orders, and said on one or two occasions to him that the gentlemen were to have what they required. He was led to believe that Mr. Grey was the responsible person. Brandy and water, cigars, and slippers for the young surveyors were supplied on his account.—(Roars of laughter.) Cross-examined—Was not in the habit of receiving orders from the chairman, because those who filled that position had frequently nothing to do with the dinner. except in their official capacity. He generally received orders from a wine steward. Many of them had soda water, lemonade, and some preferred gin to brandy. A party dined on Monday afte - r Mr. Gre — y left. Horatio Knight, head-waiter at the tavern at the time in question, deposed that the defendant took the head of the table. He always understood that he was the bead of the party. He generally gave him orders. The bill from the beds by the Company were produced, and ih,y were all doe'ard t 9 he of the nrd worth two guini3as a busnel at the present, mouueut. The LORD MAYOR asked whether the Company suf fered much from the unfair dealings of which they com plained? The Foreman—Your Lordship would be sur prised at what we have endured. We are obliged to keep perpetual watch, and the most desperate attacks have been made upon our men by the plunderers of the beds. Perhaps four fellows would steal a boat with which they would row to the beds, and one would dredge while the fourth, who is armed with a sack full of stoues, would pelt our men and desperately injure them. In one instance one of our men was almost killed. The LORD MAYOR.—WeII. Are you disposed to pro secute this man to the utmost, or will you be satisfied as he is the first person who has beers brought before me, and you seem to have no reason to think that he has been engaged in any irregularity as a member of your body if I a hnonish him. Mr. Wire, after consulting the eornpkinants, said they were satisfied with what had taken place. and that in every future case they should go for the whole penalty in b. , th ways. The Loth) MAYOR—You may depend upon my rui,st prompt at,,*istance. BO W-STRE F T. John Clark was charged on a summons with assault log William Jolly, under the follow.ng circumstances:— The complainant stated that the defendant had made a charge against him of stealing half a sovereign, which charge the insp, ctor at the station house refut..ed to entertain, on the grom - e! that it was not a theft, but a debt, for whieh a summons must he taken out. The defendant then went away, and he (complainant) followed in a few moments, and overtook the deteudant at a shun distance. The defaidant, as soon as h« saw witne,s, ran towards him, and struck him in the face, without the slightest provocation, witness not having spoken a word, or taken any notice of the prisoner. William Morgan, aho was with the complainant at the time, ettrroborated this statement. The defendant said, that after he had left the station, he was standing in the street talking with a friend, when the complainant and his witness came towards him, and said, in a loud tone, "That's the d—d vagabond who said I stole his half-sovereign." At the same time he lifted his hand, and attempted to strike him (the prisoner), but he warded off the blow and struck the complainant in the face. Tile person mentioned by the prisoner as being with him at the time gave evidence in support of this statement. The prisoner's employer, in whose service he had been for fourteen years, gave him an excellent character, and said that he was a remarkably quiet and peace able man. Mr. JARDINE said that he suspected, even when the complainant was giving his evidence, that some such ex pression as that spoken to by the prisoner's witness was made use of. These sudden attacks were not made without some provocation, or something to excite the person at the moment, and though the complainant chose to deny it, he himself believed the witness, that the com plainant called the defendant a " vagabond." Taking this into account, and also taking► into account the pri soner's previous good character (which, in all cases, had considerable weight with him), he would inflict no penalty, but defendant must pay the costs (25.) The defendant payed the costs, and left the Court. John Orchard, a drummer in the Coldstream Guards, was charged with stealing a watch and a sovereign, the property of Captain Charles Grinstead. It appeared that, on the 26th November, the prose cutor left his gold watch and a sovereign on the table in his own room, adjoining the guard-room (to which no one but the prisoner and a corporal had access), at eight o'clock in the evening, when he went to mess. At eleven o'clock he returned and missed the watch and sovereign. Nobody but the prisoner and the captain's servant had been in the room. The prisoner was apprehended on Tuesdcy last by policeman 11 17, at a public.-house in Whitechapel. He said that he had taken the watch and sovereign, and had taken a cab to Ratcliffe-highway, where lie got a man whom he knew to pawn it for 31. The policeman, after leaving the prisoner at the station, went to the lodging of the man mentioned by the prisoner, but failed in apprehend ing him. He afterwards made inquiries at the pawn broker's, and found the wat(rh which he now produced, and which was identified by the captain. Mr. JARDINE remanded the prisoner till to-morrow week. SOUTHWARK. William Bearde, alias Donovan, a young roan, with a cut over his right eye, was brought 13.-f, re Mr. Seeker, charged with entering the Dun Cow public-house, High street, with three other men, for tht purpose of com mitting felony. The prisoner, who is suspected of belonging to a gang of thieves who plunder public-h uses, walked into the Dun Cow that morning about half-past eight o'clock. They went into the tap-room and called for a quartorn of rum, and while the bar-maid was serving them the prisoner took an opportunity of slipping unperceived out of the room. In about five minutes afterwards he was seen coming down stairs, and endeavoured to make a " bolt" out of the house, but was prevented. On exa mination of the rooms up stairs, it was discovered that three coats belonging to the landlord had been taken out of his bed-room, and were found lying on the stair case, dropped, no doubt, by the pris.ner, in his anxiety to escape detection. His three companions escaped during the confusion of the moment. When before the magistrate the prisoner asseverated his innocence of having any felonious intention ; said that it was all spite, and that he obtained his living by honest means. A policeman, however, said the prisoner had been frequently in custody, and that ho belonged to a gang of thieves who had succeeded in committing extensive robberies on licensed victuallers. The prisoner was committed to the House of Cor rection for three months. He left the bar uttering loud denunciations against the parties who had given him into custody. CLERKENWE LL. James Brookes was charged with violently assaulting police-constable 141 G, under the following circum stances : The policeman stated, that on Wednesday night he saw the prisoner in the New-road, in company with a drunken female, whom he knocked down and brutally assaulted, and when he (the constable) interfered for her protec tion, the prisoner struck him three times in the face, and attempted to trip him up. When he was taken into custody he resisted violently, and it required several constables to take him to the station-house. Mr. CO3IBE said he would not, in the present case, inflict a fine; he would take the more effectual remedy of ordering the prisoner to find good bail to keep the peace. Not being provided with sureties, the prisoner was locked up. W✓ ORS HIP-STREET. A portly, respectable-looking man, named John Phillip Western, described as a gentleman, and residing at Frimley, in Surrey, was placed at the bar before Mr. Bingham, charged with having committed an unprovoked and violent assault upon a respectable young woman named Mary Mackintosh, living with her married sister, in Buck's row, Whitechapel. It appeared from the statement of the complainant, a delicate-looking person, whose eye was much swollen and discoloured, that between three and four o'clock that morning she was hastening to procure the attendance of the family surgeon for her sister, who had been su ldenly taken with the pains of labour, but had scarcely gone 20 yards from the door when she was met by the defen dant, who, without uttering a word, seized her by the shoulders, and shaking her violently, threw her heavily upon the pavement. He then commenced kicking her in a savage manner, and as she attempted to rise struck her a violent blow in the face, which again knocked her down and rendered her insensible. On recovering her consciousness she found the defendant in the custody of a constable, who appeared to have witnessed the trans action, and by whom he was at once conveyed to the police- station. Police- constable 254 K deposed to having seen the complainant thrown down in the manner she had de scribed, and i—stantly hastened to her assistance, but was too late to save her from the second attack which was made upon her, and on reaching the spot found the young woman lying upon the pavement, apparently stunned, from which a considerable time elapsed before she sufficiently recovered to be able to go to the atttion house and establish the charge. When called upon for his answer, the defendant, with great coolness, deelared that the transaction originated mi sapprehension nntfor on a w hi o s ma p n art , , )f as th h e ehl same ac cotire mista ly in a k..nthecomplaia class who had just before left his company after rob bing him of his ring and purse, and expressed his readi ness to make the complainant any pecuniary recompense the magistrate might suggest for the treatment she had received. Sergeant Graves informed the Bench that there was no foundation whatever for the insinuation the defendant had cast upon the character of the complainant, whom he had ascertained to be a person of unblemished repu tation, and to reside, as she had stated, with her brother in-law, a man of property and respectability. The complainant here intimated that, in consequence of the delicate state of her sister's health, notwithstand ing the unwarrantable ill-treatment she had sustained, it was with the greatest reluctance she had come forward at all in the matter, and hoped therefore that the magis trate would himself dispose of the case, as it would oc casion her the greatest inconvenience and annoyance to attend elsewhere to prosecute. Mr. BINGHAM said that he regretted his powers were far too limited to deal with a case of such a description, and he should therefore certainly carry them out to the utmost extent, by ordering the defendant to pay the maximum amount of penalty he was able to impose, namely, 5/. to the Queen, or, in default of so doing, he must stand committed to the House of Correction for two months. Mr. Broughton requests us to acknowledge his re ceipt of a letter from Lady Fraser, of the Manor House, Exmouth, enclosing a contribution of a sovereign for the relief of a poor man named Michael Halliday-, of Milton-street, Cripplegate, the particulars of whose sin gular case we mentioned upon a former occasion. Her Ladyship requested that the safe arrival of her contribu tion might be noticed in the papers. THE STRIKE AT KEIGIILEY.—WQ understand that the woolcombers' strike at Keighley has terminated by an amicable at rangement between the masters and the men.—Leeds Intelligences. [ADVERTISEMENT.]--ASTHMA, SHORTNESS OIF BREATH, COUGHS, AND COLDS.—A. TRULY SURPRISING CASK.— The Rev. David Williams, the resident Wesleyan minister at Beau maris, in the island of Anglesea, states, in a letter dated the 14th of January, 1815, that he " recommended Holloway's Pills to a poor man of the name of Hugh Davies, who at the time was almost un able to walk tor want of breath, that he had only taken them a few days when he app:ared quite another man; his breath was easy and na tural, and he was increasing daisy in strength." These wonderful Pills will cure any cough, cold, or asthma. Sold at Professor 11°1- loway's Establishment, 244, Strand ; and by almost all respectable youdori pr madloine throughont the ciTilind Road, ---- MARKET NE WS.— ( Y ESTERDAY.) ; 7. :.„ ~.:e.-*:, . T.f..i, SMITIIFIELD.—Meadow Hav, 2/ 55 to 4/ ; Clover ditto al 8s to Si ; and Straw, 1/ 10s to 1113 s per load. A mode rate supply and a slow trade. CUMBERLAND.-111eadov, - Hay, 9/ 8s to 41; Clover, ditto, 3/ 8a to 41 17s ; and Straw, 1/ lOs to 1114 s per load. Both hay and straw sold heavily at our quotations. Clover WHITECHAPEL.—Meadow Hay, 21 5s to 41; ditto, 31 5s to 5/ ; and Straw. 11 lOs to 1/ 133 per load. A full average supply, and a sluggish demand. DVS ~ .1 1 TGE1"2." AMD ILZADZNIAAS.L. Prime Beef and Mutton sold freely ; other kinds of me a t slowly, at our quotations. Beef, 2s 4d to 3s. 6d; Mutton, o 3s 44 to 4s 6d ; Veal, 3s 4d to 4 s 6 d; and Pork, 35 4,1 t 4s 8d per 81bs. MEAT ZA a RICETS. SOUTH A Li„ DEC. TY W 2 —e had steady sale for prime Beals. and Sheep ; but all other kinds of fat stock hung on lsr_, Beef, from 2s 8,1 to 4s 2d i Mutton. 33 6d to 53 2d; yeah 3s 64 to 4 , Gd • and Pork, 4s to 4 s 4 d per Sibs. omFoun, Dix. 2.—Altough the supplies were n ot l& the gentral demand was h in a sluggish state at our qu B 7 l tations. Beef. from 2s 10d to 4 s 24; -Mutton, 33 A j to 5a 24 ; Veal, 3s 8d to 4s 44; and Pork, 33 8d to to sold Ptr Sibs. Suckling Calves, 18s to 295 ; cluhe arterlil store Pigs, 16 3 to 18s ; and Milah Cows, with tir ema il Calf, 16/ to 18/ e,ch. Mutt LEWES, DEC. I.—Beef, from 2 s 10d to 4s 2d; ,A 33 10d to 5s 4d ; Veal, 3s 6d to 4s 2 d ; an d Pork, 49 to 4 S dr " per 81bs. A moderate supply and a dull trade. CORN AVERAGES. CSR' GENERAL AVERAGE PRICES OF BRITISH - 0 00 For the Week ended Dec. 3, 1545, .nade up ;rout the Returnmae3 Inspectors in the different Cities and Tow ns in Enland gnu per Imperial Quarter HE 0 0 4 M WHAT. 1 BARLEY. °AVIS. i RTE. i"A NS. 9d 50 9 ICE .. I 63i 9,1 46s 8d 27s 6d 46 5 Od 453 2s 04 DUTY 4s 114 2s Od Is 6d 2 s Od 2s 02 WORKS by ROi3ERT J. PULVERWELL. D •PeC it • C .kc On e Shilling each. hi post Goo and Sixrai , L D I N SINGLE and MARRI (An Original Medical HistofT.' CONTaNTs: Analysis of the Affections—Early Conventional n.e...."FaterniPl_l direction—Marital Anticipations and Realities — L awS ,n e licigo 9 l4 Maternal Influenee—Phenomena of Gestation—Onm.ll;riages-.4;a Infertile Unions—lncongruous ..Alliances Lat e )11.1Pa' Matches—Curiosities of Twenty-three Years' Me dical &c. &c. 2 ESTS On CHASTITY and its . INFRINGEM (An Essay for 1846.) " Of human ills and frailties I discourse, led. Those taught by nature, and by art aeq .- eon, Of griefs conceal'd, and disaPpointMen,.. Which young and gentle, the matured n" The lonely and the mated—all sustain. In kindly spirit, herein counsel's gien_ , ;sin. How health, how hope, how hapPine'" 3. ~_,p WHAT to EAT, DRINK, and AVO rt. With Diet Tables forall CoMplainti• ti n feellore Contents :—How to ensure perfeet digestion, tranquil 13/ an o good night's rest, a clear head, and a contentednee bier tb• a lts servanee of the instructions herein contained t" nialto veusly delica 'e, even to the most shattered constitua ija 101 the greatest amount of physical happiness, and r e cu full period of life allotted to man. sli tab " How we should live—what eat, whit drink, •• • To reach in health full threescore years and °L o a Suni: a jigele These interesting little voltunes, although bearing fo ' i r ia d of ger very delicate import, as their titles imply, will be T oryll fi° llo lll surable and general utility, for they tell af matters. e o fordiL as slt ture able is understand ought to know, but Win eh ..,,,ated these enlightened times, except that quality pronump tw o( questionab o hanuels, is at a very terrible discoun t ' l ades t r :gsao t In the exposition hereby offered of the till now relie f .% bisioir,, nature, ef human disappointments and their way s °e 010 r e hlt ^- contended that every reader shall become his or .... A u pon ••• pi i • any more than their own lawye, it IS inol° te ",,,gloii , 3olthi, should know the simple principles of our swu organ is 'a v ert ac jiasi whereby our existence and the issue thereof in th e _ la oaf IngliSn w states depend, the duties that are expected of ta„,, gulf , capacities in the family circle, and the terms on win h ave to ',Too happiness of the present and future race of mankin_,,fdiy tr a a r pgio° . _. By such knowledge, and which is herein fa'r - s ed health will be found to be in our own keoPin h o e ' re of lu n 'impru. within the attainment of all ; by the availraen t oa our duty to eurselves, we secure the like advan _,ities, indy to follow, and finally by the cultivation Df our fa e "., ; the consistent with degenerate health, the mind as Ow" be en ' 00 be exalted to the summit of perfection, as boot of God's creations. f 1 119 1011- 0 2, The author's justification for this seeming eld - 0 5 . t at ings, and the avowal of their integrity of PPrPnae,'„arifiltee 41, by their perusal—his accredited qualifications bi • 00, • o f topics broached involve his legitimate study an d P • Car y obill; go To be had of Sherwood, 23, Paternoster-I'o o ' 39p 00og . „ Fleet-street ; Hannay, 63, Oxford. street ; Mant atr eot tln" - direct from the Author, 10, Argyle-place , Iteg'a, t ,„.o•o l 7oll lo6. Great Marlborough-street), who may be advise" Y - sseell matters daily till Three, and in the Evenings f rom ~; 00 11n Sa d . 11 A POPULAR TREATISE en t he HEALTH ,LIFE 0 03 , of the BODILY FUNCTION,' ri g V' NINETEETH EDITION, price 2s. 6d. ; Fr ee bY Work Envelope) 3s. 6(1., , itlecliCo n , es torw T HE SILENT FRIEND. cant res, 9e. with en the loss of the reproductive poivers , ipc g e d P ie d DI, D. tion. The baneful effects of Indulgence , nq - o zotra. s . condary Symptoms, &c., are fully pointed ou.," age . By gravings ; followed by obs erva ti ons on 3la r ' . f r PERRY and Co., Consulting Surgeons, LondoT j a t the Published by the Authors, and may b e 7 '00 1 , 146 ' 63. 01° Sold by Strange, No. 21, Paternoster row fgy an d " o ,a ss street ; Purkis, Compton-street Soho ; theSe street, and 37, Ro3 al Exchange p addies ,.•' — e d to •„- fea r of "i Part I. of this Work is particularly ~, thro n ,g - tr odtteti eg prevented from forming a Matrimonial Allio , ' - 'lable in" tain disqualifications, and will bet' ound on al4l oo d ' rim sse a ' the means of perfect and seers' restoration to .1 dig -130 Part 11, treats perspicuous] ; upon those fortes inieetio%isd, tafsa in their primary or secondary state, arising m edical te t tad ip how numbers who neglect to obtain comP e-- Ore ° we upon themselves years of misery and suffering- leafy The CORDIAL BALM OF SYRIACUM is weillta A ew' the cure of nervous and sexual debility, irregularikna,bito. bos' rem - 4es% loss of appetite, indigestion, consumptive 3 35 • pe r ties arising from venereal excesses, &c. Price 11 , . SS" SO P tie. The Five-pound cases may be had as usua l. .An ye ffOt The CONCENTRATED DETERSIVE ESS syphilitic remedy for searching out and purifying the nir-oridnd o p nereal contamination, scurvy, blotches en the head , fa' ro es l tg ulcerations, and those painful affections arising from 1 C ment, secondary symptoms, and all eruptions of the SP.' and 335. per bottle. 41. PERRY'S PURIFYING SPECIFIC PILLS, price 2 9 .1 . Maio' and l Is. per box, are the most effectual remedy for fi1 , 4010 . flammation, irritation of the bladd e r, & c ., without 11 1 ° business. ,0 9 aw -- Consultation fee, if by Letter, 1/. A minut e d e tail O. - r 0 00 cessary. Messrs. Perry are in flatly attendance at their pro, 19, Berners-street, Oxford-street, London, from eleven v' m fl . --. lye till eight; and on Sundays from eleven till twelve. ON THE SECRET INFIRMITIES OF YOUT"'" la P MATURITY. O C* P ill. WITH TWENTY-FIVE COLOURED ENGB- , ro loloill' Just published, Twentieth Thousand, in A sealed tT mig e 2s. Gd., or post paid, to any address, for 315. 6d. ill ru - is , direct from the Author's residence. &SI l re ttoi tilt 4a ELF. PRESERVATION : AMe o d !t o ol KY on the Secret Infirmities and Disorders of YOuth. be AP - 0 00:, Illustrated with Twenty-five Coloured Plates in_L o tjes_„,f l P! Physiology, and Diseases of the Urinary and Rep , 17, 0 '', 0 070117 g explaining their various structures, uses, and fun eP ha bits,_ l fl i fejt the injuries that are produced in them, by solitary ~...,ent s t i o aSO excesses. With Practical Observations on the Tretyw ot o , Debility, Local and Constitutional Weakness, and 14 ...ft the Urethra. dinu sooso By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONSULTI NG _don: IfoS°P 9, Bedford-street, Bedford-square, Lo",_.„. a. _..dit• es.- Matriculated Member of the University ei Member of the London Hospital Medical SOnietY' n,t O n° Apothecaries' Hall, London, Ike., Ste, SD' ADO" CONTENTS OF THE TREATISIg'.., 4 O 111 1 (101- of CHAPTER 1. On the Philosophy of Marriage , actif e ctenel t sst and Obligations, and on I n f e li c it ous and UnP o f the t hat CHAPTERthe Anatomy and PhysiologY „ o rrilli t eso t o A—nCi man T l: E c n on t ray o ; n Organs, their functions, structures, and secretions' O to s Mental and Physical Power are dependant nPe n c os e we Atn ° to th S e °l c i o tar nee Y y ori f of ai ll eci ab e i a t u s s ; e t o h f eir gpoebti ii ralp tf lowrdea.le r , y00,0 3'0 10 : of the Stomach, Lungs, and Brain, and Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On the See rg a nd DO c s ''' t old 6 01 , and Maturity, and the Treatment of Nervou s . Li /00 00 2° Mental Debility, and Premature Decay. —up lzyeeS S, the Disorderr arising from indiscriminate 'lva. e ll' Gleet, Strictures, and other Diseases of the Ur affil O f ,i, leg foos e REVIEWS Or THE ig" 7 .. .,.,,r1, P , - per.... Or ~ The author of this singular and talented v".' er able,,,`; olli..T e si; fled medical man, who has evidently had COnt; f r oll r n ; 11 10 , .i .A' 0 , the tre AttneAlt of the various disorders arisln.'Are an in frailties of early indiscretion. The engraving: .., - ..aess e l, it , oOr dition, by demonstrating the consequences at `"' and n, t De act as a salutary warning to youth and ulain ritY t i;at O P- l l l 4O , ~ a to, acne' many questions may be satisfactorily replied L .,.,, ..4,..- . COo peal, even to the most confidential friend.' -- :;',: t " hiSi" .. ., t oia th I* Published by the Author, and may be h i ' . - usinn' v oof o ipsi l from Kent and Richard. 4 52, Paternoster - r ew ..:drot; 4 1,1 1 Oxford-street, Starle, Tichborne-street. Q u nrc h-stre e d OP' Leadenhall-street, London; Newton, lit C " — ' SP,AoIO 1.- and by all Booksellers. N e ti ll 7 c 15 .0511' At Home for Consultation daily, from - in „Ded t ° ' or.- Five till Eight ; and all letters immediately re,;•OT the fee of 1/., for advice. Sce..-9 BEDFORD -81 —o , '!•- ---' BOTTA RF.. T,0NT504 On the 15th ult., the laltdylßoTfirth.e Rev. F . P. 1 711::; e cl : daughter. wife s n daoalfn t u h get e hhde 2 tae 6 yßr t r h e v u . I James t.,at BLlaatinddyfoßrdr-place, e,O of C oil 7:111°13 ;* o th f e ° 3 r ceCil AO On the 27th ult., in Upper Brook-street, '"'" 5. tlir w O ilin n , t ,t h , e l: 2 s B q t . h , o u f l a t. d , aiungChtheers.ter-street, thewi t° °f 111°° °f Oaf A s , the A On the 28th ult., at Grove House, near L ee— ov ' Joseph Middleton, Esq., ofa daugilter. leaf t the pLe. O nLn n i ee t : l h, ) do e rj 2 :l 9 ien t , e h ;: u , : U. :go. f. a t ae f S a r. e Bees, Cum b e r ILI od, - of • - leg °f On the 30th ult., at Elms-court, Highg ate ' the P ir- On the 30 h " eon. t L aal t ult. in Grosvenor-Street, , Jones, of a daughter.' Op MA RRIED. N o On the 14th ult. at St. Mark's K e nningtl; gr. daughter of Matthew ' Dallett, Esq., of PutneYt Pass, of Nine Elms. ----------------- fjorl li° DIED. Job! , a On the 21st of September last, at SingaP ~ the " h Whitehead, Esq. ore, ~ife ,- n oo.-• A p. On the 21st ail ,at Inverness, Mat/ v` ~ 1 0 ' Mr. John Jameson . . E a On the 28th ult., at Lothian-road , 'O. O. Willson, Esq. On the 29th ult., at Blackheath, Mrs. Mirirdi:n°,llll4oolleit°. On the 30th ult., at Ramsgate, J. r" And f e orro efif 54 4 On the 30th ult., Arthur Greville, Es ( l• 9 obit - in Sun-court, Cornhill. BO ' 14 Pl if the late On the 30th nit., in Portman-square, -I°ll° M.P. for East Worcestershire. of _.....," - 0 ... On the 30th ult., William, youngest so: Cameron, Esq., of Northaw-place, Ham- Lieu l t l . l -Colonels ----- wirAfir• do° usA— Phillott, half-pay , 35th Foot, Kensington. , VI Maj • ' or—Ldmonstone, 81st Foot, Edinburgn.„o,oooll, p2olftlitg4ll6l7ren°adflielrid --IA- Captains—Guille, Unattached, Guernsey; pate pay sth West India Regiment; William Fre9e" oh eteran Battalion Lieuteitants—Kershaw, 80th Foot, Lahore; 1 o t A fi rp Foot, Fort Cox, Katirland ; Luyken, Rog o , h i t al' 3d d ominica • Martyn, late 7th Battalion; Ji',, c '''' ss icls; jf.P% Foot ; ' Plidlipeon half-pay Ist Dragoon 00 Vso let, half-pa • 11th foot, ot , Lurgan, re an , ba it. N t 44th ) 1 ,16 ' Foot; .51‘.Nahh, Unattached; Lledding, Foot. a eadie;oo Second Lieutenant., Cornets, or Essign---t• CO r elit o , ija Foot, Agra; Lawles., 2d West India Regn,.,coec ,o, 50th Foot, Loodiana - b ; Coney, 73d Foot, . 1- `:. Geior A if - Gloucestershire ; Mamie, half• pay 28th Drogon,r;piog,P half-pay Artillery German Legion, Hanover ; r di; GO pay Royal Marines. l orse„, ) , 1;1' f Quartermasters—Cart, ball-pay Roy ( ' f y . 7 "" If-ri Barrow, half-pay 10th llussars; Reid, hAI p a t n, b il goons; Smith, half-pay 28th Dragoons; .I , a Col li' Lanark F •Ll enci . e Cavalry. Per il half-paY Comm - • issariat Department — B o y ee, i ,Oll , mandant General. goo r a tthe ° Medical Department—Deputy Inspector y ot' Chambers, S taff, Jamaica; G. Stewart, 18th , half-pay, Apothecary. Oa : --....••••••"'.'""if 141 191 - Os •-..„aisC - L0n..1 • 'rioted and Published by AWRDO - irand, i'rbiter, at The Sun (Mice, No. 112, Stra% of tran~l, in yriaPi t the Savoy. th e County of 04141010, ecmber 4, 184.