The Sun. — London, England, 1846-03-30 00:00:00

THE CARRICK COAST HERRING AND WHITE FISHERIES. (From the Ayr Advertiser.) Shortly after New Year's Day those fish of passage, sod, ling &c., oame, from far away seas, in large , and , tip to liarch, increasing numbers to our shores. In their wake came shoals of herrings, and in pursuit of ' both, the porpoises (delpliinus phcevena), locally called the herring-hog or stmur, a large fish of the whale kind, and prized by the fishers for its oil. Over all, the sea birds swarm in immense numbers. They are among the first to descry the approach of a shoal, and from Ailsa Rock, their old ocean fortalice, sally forth to share the spoil with the fishermen. The wild ducks and sea gulls will float along the sur face, and with a rapid, off-hand impulse, dive down upon their prey ; but the gannet, or solon goose, re quires to gain a sufficient impetus by darting Gown from a height, when his keen eye detects his glittering prize, the herring. So also does the scart or cormorant. The shoal of herrings has now left the bank at Ballantrae, after having been upon it for about a fortnight, during which, as the weather was highly favourable, an immense quantity has been taken. There was a ready demand for them upon the spot by Irish smacks, so that the money realised must have been very great—moderately estimated at 2,0001. About an hundred boats were en gaged in the fishing, some of which had two shots per day, with 100 hundreds each shot. Such a day's take at 2s. a hundred would amount to 20/. The Irish smacks roil the herring s, and fi nd a profitable market for them at home, where Lent keeping makes a virtue of the ne cessity which little money imposes to use the cheap fish diet. It was one of the absurd encouragements of the old grotecting bounty system to make Lent-keeping coin pursory under civil as well as church penalties. It is encouraging in the present attempt to remove such injurious props from another branch oj e our national industry, that since the withdrawal of Bounties-Only some twenty years ago) the produce of our fisheries has doubled. Few fish were caught, when men trusted to the bounties and not to their own exertions. Indeed, the vessels were many of them rigged out to catch the bounties, and not the fish. ,These vessels would be fitted out with an imposing apparatus of old barrels, rotten nets, &c., and although few or no fish were caught or looked for, the bounty being paid on the ton nage, together with what smuggling could be done by the way, made the trip pay well. Now that there 15 a fair field and no favour, the wholesome and invigorating effects of self-reliance are seen in vastly increased exer tions and produce, and improved methods. In the teeth of these and many more such facts the Government may and evidently do feel sperfectly satisfied with their wholesome measure of letting the landowners lean to their own weight, of not allowing them to persist in being the national cripples, propped by or carried on the backs of ...very one else. That wholestune self reliance Oich has been so good for our'fieheries will also stireulato our farmers. When the boinitha were m aintained to enable our fis hers to compete with foreigners, esp-Tially the Dutch, the complaint was, " we fish intole rably dear, and the Dutch exceedingly cheap," so that really protection is in all its phases a stale old fallacy of hich stout men should be ashamed. Now that everybody se es that this protection and all its sophisms are blown off, and its naked partiality and selfishnes, its direct variance to the common sense, interest, and experience of tie nation are palpable to all, it is surprising that shr( wd men don't quickly throw it overboard to save refl , eons. Wo are now civilised enough to repudiate extron 3 selfishness, and to subscribe to the hearty cos mopolite maxims—" all true interests are one"—" self love And social are the same ;" and Christian enough to see the fitness and general wholesomeness of looking not solely to one's own things, but also to the things of others—all approaches to those golden rules of love and duty, not yet attained to in our age. COURT OF COMMON COUNCIL. On Thursday a Court was held for the dispatch of public business. THE CHARITABLE TRUSTS BILL. Mr. HARTLEY (the Chairman of the Parliamentary Com mittee) broug up the report for presenting a petition to the House of Edecis against the Charitable Trusts Bill. It stated, that the'Coniiittee having deliberately perused and considered the bill, were of opinion, that it was unjust in its provisions, and unconstitutional in its operation; that the authority . thereby proposed to be given to the commis sioners and inspectors was too extensive, and without ap peal ; that no provision was made for the publicity of the proceedings of the commissioners or inspectors ; that all charities which came under its survey would be obliged to contribute to the expense of the commission, whether abuses in the administration of the funds existedor not ; and that the power of the commissioners to remove trustees was greater than was necessary, and might be applied to party or political purposes ; and that the Committee, therefore, directed the Remembrancer to prepare a draft of a petition to the House of Lords. A short discussion, in which strong opposition was ex pressed to the Bill, took place, and the report was agreed to by a large majority; as was the petition which was drawn up by the Remembrancer. BLACKFRIARS KEE, V. THE CORPORATION AND WATERMEN OF TILE CITY. Upon the the motion of Mr. T. H. HALL, the report of the Navigation Committee, on the frequently discussed subject cf the Blackfriars-bridge Pier, was taken into consideration. The report, after describing all that had been done by the Corporation for the accommodation of the public, concludes with the following paragraph : " Your Committee have anxiously exerted themselves to carry out effectually the wishes of this Court, that a safe and commodious pier should be erected for the accommodation of the public, and they are desirous that the access thereto should have been equally and fairly secured for the general benefit. Your Committee regret that the eagerness of com petition, and the pursuit of private interests have interferred with these intentions, and prevented in some degree the general advptage which was proposed by the Court. 'Your CoMmittee cannot close the report without expressing an anxious hope that the differences amongst the steam -boat proprietors, at present impeding the realization of their desire to afford to all, without distinction, a great public conve nience, may at no distant period cease; and that the object of the Corporation, having been ob v i ous ly t o c h ec k i n dividual interest. and solely for the benefit of all classes of the public, may yet be fulfilled, and afford that satisfaction which your Committee confidently anticipated would result from the liberal expenditure involved, the consideration given, and the exertion demfed to the attainment of the object in view." Mr. HALL stated that the alteration which it had been found necessary to make in' the newly-constructed pier, for the more complete protection of human life, caused a con siderable increase of expenditure; and he was happy to be able to state, that within the last two days the City had arrived at a perfect understanding with the company, which had before departed from the arrangements at the pier, so that there would no longer be ground of difference of opi nion. —( Hear, hear.) The report, which recommended a grant of money not exceeding 1,1001. for payment of bills for extra works in erection of the pier, was then agreed to, and sent back to the Committee to be carried into effect. A report for providing funds for the improvement of Smithfield-market, by the sale of stock in the Court of Chancery, applicable to the purchase of freehold property, was brought up and agreed to, and sent back to the Corn. niittee, to be carried into effect accordingly. RAILWAY TERMINI IN THE CITY. Mr. R. L. JONES brought up the report of the Improve ment Committee in relation to the London and Birmingham Railway Company, and the Direct London and Manchester Railway Company, having abandoned their proceedings, in the present session of Parliament, relative to proposed rail way termini within the City. The report was agreed to without - discussion. WARD SCHOOLS. . _ _ A discussion tosk place upon the report of the Coal, Corn, and Finance Committee, recommending the granting of 5001. for the expenses of the ball and concert, for the benefit of the Ward Schools, and the report was carried by a very large majority. THE RAILWAY MANIA. Mr. Lo•rr brought forward, on the last court day, a motion tt the effect that no member who had any interest on rail way speculations should be eligible to Committees in the Tirt on the subject of making railway termini within the City. He considered that it was necessary, in order to main tain in purity and integrity the acts of the Court as a delibe rative assembly, that their conduct should be placed above suspicion. They had the example of the great council of the nation for passing a self-denying ordinance. He trusted that, for the power and dignity of the Court, they would pass the resolution. Mr. Bum! seconded the resolution. The resolution, af,er a short discussion, was passed by a large majority. CITY VRUIT-METERS. Mr. Pneoa brought up the report Of the Coal, Corn, and Finance Committe upon the subject of fruit-meters of the City of London. The office of fruit-meter has hitherto been purchasable, but :without alienation. A vacancy having recently occurred by the death of one of those officers, the stbject was referred to the Committee, which, in its report, recommended that the Court should fill up the vacant office by electing a proper person at a salary of 2501. per annum, who should be obliged to give security in 500/., to pay the amount received by him for metage into the Chamber, and that the sum thus received by the elected meter should be employed by the Common Council or Committee for the relief of trade. The Corporation had no power over the amount received by the other three meters, as they have purchased their offices, with the right to the profits. The in come received by each of the four meters, according to the report, was 1,2881. 10s. 101 d. per annum. Mr. Bowie's condemned the practice of demanding a tax upon fruit and vegetables adopted by the City of London. Mr. Fitton said the matter h a d already occupied the atten tion of the Committee. Mr. HAmnisoN particularly detailed the advantages de rivable from the labours of the Committee. The report was then agreed to. TlxrmsnittE Pics.— A correspondent of the Gar dener's Chronicle says—" Berkshire is proverbial for its breed of pigs; and, as the present season is a fit time for rearing them, a few remarks on the qualities and extraordinary di_ mensions of this peculiar breed may be interesting t o some of your readers. The Berkshire breed, which is reckoned one of the best in England, is perhaps more celebrated for its fine qualities than its dimensions, al though these are often considerable. One of the Berk shire breed killed is reported to have measured, from the nose to the end of the tail, three yards eight inches, and to have stood four feet and a half in height ; its weight, when killed, was eighty-six stones eleven lbs. avoirdupois, according to the old stone of fourteen lbs., the weight being 1,215 lbs. Another instance I know of ; one reared in this country, and recently killed, was found to weigh thirty-eight score.. Examples of the Berkshire breed were given at the late Smithfield show, which were highly praise!, and successful in competing with other breeds. Size, however, is of minor importance ; and, since the in troduction of the Chinese race, which has tended to the improvement of our own breeds, we less frequently hear of instances of enormous magnitude than formerly. The most common weight of the Berkshire breed is from twelve to fifteen scorce, although many fattened at two years old weigh twenty score when killed, and some even more. Two primary qualities are, that the bone is small, and that they fatten at an early age on little food. The true Berkshire breed is known to be black, with white spots, but some aro quite white; their snouts are short, jowls thick, and ears erect. A mixed breed, by crossing the Berkshire with the Chinese breed, possesses improved qualities, though susceptible of cold for want of hair. Ex cellent, however, as the flesh of the Chinese hog is, and of the breeds crossed with it, preference is given, by competent judges of its qualities, to some of our native improved breeds, as yielding, what is most essential, the best bacon ; is of these, the breed of this, as well as that of other counties, 11 4 1 113 - esteemed. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, March 28. IN RE DYCE SOMBRE. This was a petition to confirm the Master's report, approving of the manner in which certain portions of the property of Mr. Dyce Sombre should be appropriated. The Master had reported that certain fees and small debts should be paid, and that the linen, plate, carriage, and harness should be used by Mrs. Dyce Sombre, and also a certain part of the books, but that another portion of books should be placed in the possession of Mr. Dyce Sombre. Various other trifling arrangements were also suggested. His LORDSHIP confirmed the report without prejudice to any question as to the rights or the property. ROLL'S COURT, March 28. • GRAY V. THE LIVERPOOL AND BURY RAILWAY COMPANY. This was a motion for an injunction, to restrain the defendants, the Liverpool and Bury Railway Company, from proceeding in the construction of their railway over certain lands belonging to the plaintiffs, who were the owners of cotton mills situate at Darcey Lever, in the county of Lancaster. By the 93 d section of the Rail way Act, it was enacted, that the Company should not, in the construction of their railway, obstruct, or in any manner injure, the goits belonging to the plaintiffs con nected with their mills and works at Darcey Lever, under a penalty of 750/. for each day of such obstruction. The Company, without the consent of the plaintiffs, had en tered upon ,part of their land adjoining that on which their mills were erected, and had marked out a line run ning from west to east, which the plaintiffs contended was contrary to the provisions of the Act. The defen dants contended that the line which had been marked out would lilt interfere with the full enjoyment by the plaintiffs of their mills and works- This case came up on the 14th of this month, when, at the suggestion of the Master of the Rolls, it was arranged that the motion should stand over, for the purpose of effecting an amicable arrangementif possible. This was, however, found to be impracticable, and the arguments were continued this day. Mr. 'Cinderslex, 114. Turner, and Mr. Bacon ap peared for the plaintiff; ind the Solicitor-General, Mr. non, and Mr. R. Palmerfcir Ole defendants. LORDSHIP considered thct what the defendants intended to do was contrary to the provisions of the Act. They were bound to content the plaintiffs in the line which they had adopted. This they had not done, bet had taken possession of the land, and marked out a line which the plaintiffs thought would be detrimental to their property. He should therefore grant the in junction. The Courts of Chancery will not sit again until the first day of Easter term.% VICE-CHANCEL iR'S COURT, March 28. SIR GEORGE LARPEN V. THE RICHMOND RAILWAY. Mr. Dethell applie., or an exparte injunction on be half of Sir George rpent to restrain the Richmond Raikvey Company om taking possession of his land at lidiney. It appe: d that the railway company had con tracted to purch = certain property, part of which was attached to the •laintiff's mansion at Putney. The ab stract of title . d been delivered, but the conveyance of the land had not been executed, and the purchase-money had not been paid. The Vice- Chancellor granted the injunction to restrain the railway company from taking possession of the land until they should have completed the purchase and paid the purchase-money. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. NORFOLK ClRCUlT.—Norwich, March 27. CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice M&uLE.) THE YARMOUTH MURDER. _ _ _ _ Samuel Yarham, aged 29, was charged with the wilful murder of Harriet Candler, at Yarmouth, by inflicting divers blows on her head with a hammer, and cutting her throat with a knife, on the 18th Nov., 1844. Mr. Palmer and Mr. O'Malley were counsel for the prose cution ; Mr. Dasent defended the prisoner. The case having been fixed for this morning at ten o'clock, the avenues of the court were crowded at an early hour of the morning, the greatest anxiety being evinced by all classes to be present at a trial which had for so long a time occu pied the attention of the county, to the exclusion of almost all other matters. The prisoner having pleaded to the in dictment with a clear and determined voice, Mr. PALMER proceeded to open the case .n behalf of the prosecution. The first witness was Mr. Worship—l am a surgeon, at Yarmouth. On the 19th of November, 1844, I was called up to attend the de ceased. I went, and found the deceased behind the counter, in a sitting position. This witness then went on to give a minute description of the injuries which the deceased had sustained from blows on the head, and to describe a cut in her neck, from which he should consider about two pints of blood had flowed. The finger on the right hand was cut obliquely. He should suppose that she had been dead about two hours. The wound in the throat was inflicted before death ; the wounds on the head would not have caused death instantly ; she might have survived the wound in the throat, if the wounds had not been inflicted on the head. These wounds were minutely described at the former trial. By the JUDGE—She died from the loss of blood produced by the wounds. Examination continued—After the infliction of the blows on the head, she was in the state of a person in a At of apo plexy. She might have opened her eyes after the blows on the head. Cross examined—The wounds on the head would not have caused instant death. I have seen instances in which in juries to the head had been greater, and the parties had recovered. Mr. W. S. Oatchpole, solicitor, Yarmouth, deposed—On the night of the murder the prisoner occupied a part of my louse ; the prisoner's wife was my housekeeper, and the prisoner was a shoemaker, and had a room for that purpose. On the Saturday I told Mrs. Yarham that I was going to dine at the Angel on the Monday, and the prisoner took my dress boots to the Angel. I went home about half-past one o'clock. I rang the bell, and the prisoner opened the door directly; the prisoner was dressed. I had a Scotch terrier in my house, which was a very watchful animal. When I went back the dog was. with the prisoner. There was a light in the passage ; there was scarcely time for him to have lit the candle before he opened the door; the pri- sonar assisted me off with my boots, but did not say anything ; the prisoner afterwards came and called me up, as the police had just rung the bell. I was in the Black Swan between five and half-past five, when the prisoner went in, and I sent him to my room for my snuff-box and some money. When he returned the pri soner said his wife was frightened, as there was somebody up the chimney; the chimney was searched and nobody found. The prisoner repeatedly said he was quite awake, and never heard any noise. The next morning I went back to the house. The prisoner and his wife were conversing about it. The wife said she had been twice into the shop f)r candles for him at night, and had not heard or seen any thing. Cross-examined—The prisoner and his wife have lived in my service from July. They were recommended to me by a tradesman in Yarmouth, to whom the prisoner was foreman. I placed confidence in him, and he never abused that confi dence ; he was an honest and very industrious man. George F. Knights, private watchman to Mr. Harvey's tan-yard. On the night of the murder I was on duty, and heard a row about twelve o'clock. I went towards the spo , , and saw two men going in the direction of Beverley's Mill. From thence they crossed to a sand hill. One stooped at a sand hill, and then they both stooped at another sand hill. They were about forty yards from me. The moon was going down. One man was taller than the other. The prisoner was not one of those two men. I got upon the hinges of the gate to see what they were doing, but could not. Their arms were moving. Hooked towards the bleach pales, and saw a man going towards the north, which would lead to wards the Market-gates. At that moment 1 heard a noise, and could not see anything. I returned, but saw no more of any of these parties. I could not say who the single man was, but ho was about the height of the prisoner. By the JUDGE—That man was very much like Yarham. Examination continued—The next day the money was found near the place where I had seen the two men in the night. After the trial I saw the prisoner when he came from the Castle, and they went to a barber's shop, and from there to a public-house. I heard Yarham say, " that though they were clear of the murder. they ;were not clear of the robbery. It would linger and linger on till it was found out." Cross-examined—l was not asked at the last trial about the single man. I was asked about the two men. I then said I saw the shadow of a man. By the JUDGE—I saw the shadow of a man first, and then I saw the man himself. The man had a great coat on. Re-examined—When Yarham came out of the Castle, it struck me that he was the man I had seen. George Taylor, publican, formerly a policeman deposed— On the night of the murder I was on duty. About half-past twelve o'clock I was near Mr. Tooley's buildings, near the Market-row. I turned my lamp against the Farmer's Arms to trim it, and as I passed the corner of the road to the Market-gates I met the prisoner. I have not the least doubt of it in my own mind, as I have known him before. By the JUDGE—It was about a quarter to one when I met him. Examination continued—On my way home I went to the Feathers Inn, where I saw Hall lying on the settle. Cross- examined—l was discharged from the police for neglect of duty. J. B. Bales, sergeant at mace—l went to the house on the morning of the murder about four o'clock, and assisted in taking the body up. Underneath it was a half-ounce paper of tobacco. I was at the Black Swan the morning after, and went to search the chimney, but could not find anything. Sarah Dick, the wife of John Dick, of the Town Battery— On the morning of Tuesday, 19th November, 1844, I went to get some linen. At half-past two I carried some linen to Mr. Shipley's, and on returning home, I said to my daughter, who was with me, "Let us see, the boys have been hiding something here." I put my hand down, and there was nothing. I followed this marks a little further where the feet stopped. I said there is something here, let us see, perhaps the woman's money is here. I went down on my knees, and begun to poke the sand away, and I found a bag buried, and which jinked as though there were coppers in it. Mr. Tooley's man came over from the mill. My husband pulled the bag out of the hole and said it was the woman's money, because the ticket was on. Royal said there ought to be more yet, and he put his hand in and pulled out a small bag with some gold and silver, and he wanted to count it. My husband said it should not be counted. My husband said he would carry all, but Royal would not let him. We all then went to the inquest together, and gave them to Sergeant Williament. There was a brullen bottle and mug near the place, as if for a mark. I was at the battery in the afternoon after I t ca e m p e l f a r c o e m wh t e ll i e .a c l oart ; a man came up to me, and was at h found the money • he was poking at the hole. He walked up to me and began to talk to me; he had dark trousers and a b lue co at buttoned up to his neck, and a high hat, and I did not know him then, but have since ascertained it was the prisoner. The man said it was cold here, and you need have a good fire. I s a id I would keep better if I could afford it. He said, " Your nameis Dick !" said, Yes." He said, " You found the money." I said "I did." He said, "All you have to do now is to find the murderer." I said, " I wished to God I could : I would walk twenty m il es to do so, lame as I was." He then said (moving his foot) am the murderer." I said, "If you are the murderer, you would not tell me." I said, " What is your name ?" He said, " You know me." I said " I did not." He said "Yes, you do." I said "If he would tell me I would tell the gentleman ;" he said, " You know me." He then walked away as far as the hole, then turned round and looked at me again, then pro ceeded towards the town. I told the Mayor what had passed, and the Mayor said it was only some person tampering with justice. I said I should like to see Yarham. He said it could not be him. I was afterwards examined before the magistrates, and when the other persons were examined I looked at the dock when before the magistrates, and thought I knew him, but could not recollect who it was. There was a young man named Seamen in the battery at the time the man spoke to me, and he told me the man's name was Yar ham, and that was why I asked to see him. After the trial, I and my husband went home by the train, when we saw Yarham and his wife. He tried to shake hands with my husband, but he refused. I said, "Good God, if that be Yarham, that is the man that spoke to me." After I get in the carriage, Yarham's wife asked me if I thought the people in Yarmouth would think she was the guilty party if they stopped or left Yarmouth ? I said " God knows, you know your conscience best." When the prisoner first came up to the railway station, he said to my husband, " Don't you know me, I am Yarham, but call me Mr. C.," and offered to shake hands. When we were going along, Yarham said, " Mrs. Dick, say as little about the money as possible, for my solicitor told me that the pri soners' solicitor wanted to fetch me in the murder, and you as the person that helped me to hide it." I said, " Dick, do you hear what Yarham says ?" and my husband came up, and the prisoner told him the same thing. On getting to Yarmouth, the prisoner said, " Mrs. Dick, if I see anything in the paper that would affect you or yo ur husband's cha racter I will let you know." my husband said, "Don't paper." come to mine, I don't want you, I t ake a I saw him again on the top of the market , on a Tuesday, e ither a fort night or three weeks after, it was between nine and ten o'clock. He came up to me, and said, "How do you do ?" I said, " Who are y ou ? I don t know you." I did not just that moment recollect his name. He said, "Do any of these fellows interfere with you ?" I said they did not inter fere with me so much as they did with the girl. I said, Do t he y interfere with you ?" lie said, "No ; they know better, but the people plague me so much that I cannot stay here. I have been to the workhouse to get money to go away with." I said, " I think you ought to have spoken the truth at first, and things would have gone better. I think you are either the murderer yourself, or know who did it." I thought I had no right to say so, and I turned to leaye him. He said, " Stop, and I will tell you all about it." I stopped, and he said he was not so much to blame as they were, for they never let him rest after they heard that Mrs. Candler had got the money. He said he heard Mr. Catchpole was going about amongst the " angels'." I said, " Where is the house ?" He said, " The Angel Inn." He said they came to him and asked him to let them in ; that he made a bargain with them not to hurt the old woman, for they bad time enough to get the money in the time she was getting the beer, as she was generally a quarter of an hour gone. He let them in at the back door, except Royal, who watched about the time she went for the beer. He told them to go into the bedroom, for that was where she kept her money. While they were there the woman came in sooner than usual. He was up stairs, and on hearing Mrs. Candler come in, he put out the candle, and sat on the bed. Royal went in. She said, " What do you here? I know you." Royal asked for half an ounce of tobacco, and as she was going to get it, Royal and Hall knocked her down with the pincers. They thought she was dead. Mapes ran out to a woman on the other side of the street, and said, " All's right." He said, "If there is any noise at the Swan, I will go and see who is there." She said there were several people there. They all went up Meek Swan-row, end eaw several people there; one of them was a young man who they thought mast know them. Mapes then ran home to the Feathers' tap. As he was going along the Market-gates, lie saw a person turn a light on him, who afterwards appeared to be Layton, the policeman. He then ran home, telling the others to bury the money, and to give him a signal when it was done, as his house was sure to be searched first. When he went home he saw the woman lying in the shop. She turned her eyes on him, and he, seeing a la; d knife lying by her, took it, and cut her throat. I said, " You are the murderer." Prisoner said, " No, she could not live, she had been beaten so much by Royal and Hall." Royal did give the signal, and he opened the window and saw Royal going down the street, and pliceman Waller coming down the other. There was a man come up then and hit him on the shoulder, and said, " Are you going ?" and they both went away together. Cross-examined—l went about my business, and made my purchases, and went home. I did not mention it to a police man till it was mentioned to the magistrates. It was some time after. I cannot tell how long it was after. It might be three months before I mentioned it. I was at Yarmouth all that time. Yarham was not, to the best of my larowledge. I did not see him. I saw Tatham at the old Gaol Hall. I asked the mayor to see Yarham that I might see him, be cause I wanted to see if it was him. _ _ _ Witness (in great agitation)-34 Lord, am I obliged to answer these questions? JUDGE—Ye', indeed you are. Witness, I thought it was not right to give the man in charge after what the mayor bad said. I saw him'when he was before the magistrates. When I saw bim there I thought I knew him, but could not recollect for the moment who it was. _ _ Re-examined by Mr. PALMER—I did not expect to meet Yarham. My husband told me not to say anything about it, for he said they should get into trouble, as no one could put an ounce of weight upon 'his (Yarham's) evidence. I first told a married daughter of mine about it, and she told me to tell the gentlemen; and it was she that told the gen tlemen about it, and they came down to her about it. Sarah Dick, examined by Mr. O'MALLZY—I am daughter of last witness. I lived in 1844 at the battery. On Tues day, the 19th of November, I remember a man coming and speaking to my mother. There was a boy in the battery who told me that the man's name was Yarham. The pri soner at the bar is the man. I remember going to Norwich after the trial. Yarham and his wife were there. I know him to be the same man that spoke to my mother. My mother told me the conversation she had with Yarham, and I told Mr. Wm. Yates, the magistrate, about it. There was some disagreeableness between my father and my mother, and I asked her the reason. She then told me all about it. I told the magistrates, because I thought it not a proper thing to. be kept a secret. Re-examined—l had heard my mother mention, speaking to Mr. H. Palmer, who was then mayor, and I di d not think it was necessary to mention it again. _ _ _ William Seainen ' examined by Mr. human, deposed—l remember the 19th of November, 1844. I looked out at the gate and saw a man whom I knew to be Yarham. I had known him before. He lived at Mr. Catchpole's. I had seen him them when I swept the chimneys. John Dick, examined by Mr. O'MALLEY, deposed—l am a gunner of the artillery, and I remember flading the money. I was at the trial, and in the witnesses' room, but I did not see Yarham then. I saw him down at the railway station; my wife said something to me. I told her to have nothing to do with him, we had had trouble enough. Some time after my wife was going to tell me some conversation with Yarham about it, but I refused to listen to her. Cross-examined—l read the account of the trial in the newspapers to my wife in my own house, and read over her own evidence. at her request, read out the trial. Re-examined—My wife was busy about the house. It did not take me long to read it. James Kemp governor of the workhouse at Yarmouth— On the 18th of March Yarham applied to the board for some money to go away. The board took time to consider about it, and he was to call upon me on Tuesday the 22d. It was to enable him to leave Yarmouth. I gave him 31. William Shuckford, keeper of the borough gaol—Yarham was in my custody in December, 1844. The paper pro duced 1 received from Samuel Yarham ; it is in his hand writing. It was given to me to give to the Mayor. I also received two other papers, which I received from the pri soner, or one of the assistants, while they were in my cus tody. I delivered them to the borough magistrates. On Sunday, Dec. 8, 1844, I went into the prisoner's room, and he felt very uncomfortable, and said, it was very hard that he should be shut up there for what he did not know any thing about. I said if he was innocent ho had no reason to fear. It was a serious matter, and I had no doubt the truth would come out, and that the reward that was offered would help to get at the truth. Prisoner said if he knew anything about it he would freely tell. The schoolmaster then entered the room, and the prisoner asked him to pray with him, which he did. I never held out any inducement to him to . confess. Joseph Jackson, schoolmaster to Yarmouth gaol, held out no inducement whatever to make him confess. Cross-examined—The magistrates several times saw the prisoner, but I was not present, and cannot say what passed. Henry Worship, surgeon to the gaol—l remember seeing the prisoner on the Bth of December. I held out no induce ment or threat whatever to draw out a confession. Mr. Holt, clerk to the magistrates, was present when the prisoner was committed the last time. There was no induce ment made to him whatever. These are signed by him. in terviews with magistrates had many with the prisoner on the Bth of December, and before too, and they put questions to him. None of them said in my presence that it would be better for him to tell the truth, and then he would be admitted as evidence. He was com mitted as principal at first, and was not examined after he was committed. He was committed on a charge of murder. I do not know that the magistrates sent men to try to get out of him what they could. Some of the magistrates came and examined the prisoner nearly every day. I can not say whether much impression was made upon the pri soner by the questions that were asked. He always seemed collected. Sometimes the magistrates visited the prisoner three times a day, and sometimes as many as six magistrates examined him at once. I was present on most occasions, and Mr. Palmer, the solicitor, was there too. He was very busy about the case, but did not ask any questions of the prisoner. I suggested to the magistrates sometimes. They used to take their friends sometimes, but I didn't think the prisoner was made a " show" of. Their object was to elicit the truth. He was questioned and crJss-examined by them. I have known prisoners questioned by justices in public court. These interviews were all in the gaol, and were privately conducted. Re-examined—The visits were made in the justices' room at the gaol, to avoid the necessity of taking the prisoner through the streets each time. Mr. PALMER then offered to put in evidence certain writ- ten statements made by the prisoner on and after the Bth of December. Mr. DASENT ebjected to their admissibility after the ac count which had been given of the treatment experienced by the prisoner before those statements were procured from him; and His LORDSHIP said that he should only receive them sub- ject to the opinion of the judges. The prisoner certainly appeared to have been dealt with in a most extraordinary manner by the magistrates, though it is difficult exactly to say that they acted improperly. He was subjected, at all events, to their visits for several weeks, and often three times in one day, there being sometimes six magistrates present, besides other parties. If the statements were pressed, he should receive them, but it would be at the peril of the pro secution to use them. Mr. PALMER then declined to put them in evidence, and then closed his case. Mr. DASSWT then addressed the jury, confessing that be rose to do so with great fear and trembling lest the interests of the unfortunate man at the bar might have suffered from the peculiar circumstances under which he had been called upon to defend him, coupled with his inability as an advo cate. He had only been instructed at nine o'clock on that very day, and but for the feeling that, having been present at the former trial, he had a general idea of the case, and that it was his bounden duty not to refuse his professional services—weak though they might be—when they were required in aid of a man accused of so heinous an offence as that of murder, he should certainly have declined to under take so arduous a task. The case of the prisoner was one which had attracted public attention to an extraordinary extent. The peculiar circumstances which formed the groundwork of this charge had found their way not only into the country papers, but into the metropolitan preos ; but he hoped that the jury, in coming to a verdict on the case now presented to them, would discard all rumours and prejudices which they could not but have imbibed when abroad, and would bring to the consideration of the important questions about to be submitted to them the firm determihation to administer justice with impartiality, steering a middle course between the desire to shield a murderer from false Symeathy on the one hand, and that blind rashness which hurries to a conclusion of his guilt, simply because the offence with which he was charged was that of murder. The case now ripe for their verdict was one which was perhaps unparalleled in the history of crime. Never before had a charge been brought forward under circumstances so extraordinary, so exposed to suspicion; and it therefore was the duty of the ju r y t o watc h an d scrut i n i se t h e ev i dence with which it was supported with the utmost jealousy, for if it should appear to them to b e a c h arge capa bl e o f proofi to a certain extent at least on the former trial, and yet kept back most sedulously from public vi ew on t h at occas i on, i n order that the evidence of that day might tally with the TieW then advanced by the prosecution, it did strike him most forcibly that they ought at once to acquit the prisoner. It was idle to conceal from himself or the jury the notorious fact that Yarham had been examined on the first trial, and had then made certain statements implicating the three men, Royal, ➢iapE.s, and Hall, in Cala m urder, under very peculiar circumstances. Mrs. Dick was then a fallow-witness with Yarham, was engaged with him, and acted in support of him in the attempt to take away the lives of those three men, and yet she was then, if she is now speaking truth, in posies. sion of the astounding and conclusive confession of that very fellow• witness, made to her and her daughter too on the day after the murder, that he was the murderer, while he then denied it on his oath. That fact she kept back from the jury ou that occasion. So did her' daughter. Seamen was not called, and yet the mayor, according to her statement, knew that she had that information ! Was such a case to be readily trusted? If such important evidence was kept back then, and the proof was then dressed and trimmed to suit the peculiar theory of the prosecution, and that, tco, with the sanction of the magistrates, who had so conducted themselves towards the prisoner at the bar, when they wanted to extort a " state ment " from his lips, what might there not even now be in the back ground ? This case to-day might be as vicious as that, and it was the imperative duty of the jury to interfere and put a check upon such conduct by at once declining to act upon the testimony of Mrs. Dick and her daughter. He left his client's cause in their hands, satisfied that they could come to no conclusion but that which would lie favourable to him. Mr. Justice MAULS then proceeded to sum up the case. The jury retired for a quarter of an hour, and at the end of that short interval returned into court with a verdict of Guilty. The Learned JUDGE then, proclamation being made, which scarcely stifled a low buzz of approbation consequent on the verdict, passed the awful sentence of death upon the wretched man, whom he conjured to apply himself to the task of pre paration for the future world in the most solemn and im pressive tones, aolding out no prospect or hope of mercy from human laws. The prisoner received the admonition of the Learned Judge and the thrilling sentence of the law with a subdued but indifferent demeanour, and at the conclusion of the scene in which he had borne co prominent a part, was immediately removed by the gaoler from public gaze. Mr. Baron Parke has been trying prisoners during the greater part of the day, and so has Mr. Sergeant Byles, the civil business having terminated rather abruptly. SATURDAY, TWELVE O'CLOCK, P.M. Both the Courts sat all day, the one to five o'clock, and the other, the Crown Court, to nine o'clock, by which time, with the aid of the Learned Sergeant, the whole calendar was disposed of. Many of the cases tried during the day were of a serious character, but the length to which our report of yesterday's proceedings have carried us, must plead as our excuse for their unwilling omission. On inquiry this morning, it was stated that the convict Yarham was low and dejected, and that he had had frequent and casual interviews with the worthy chaplain of the gaol, but no indication had as yet been given of any desire to give his sanction to the verdict of yesterday, which he had met with the solemn expression. lam innocent. so help me God." NORTHERN ClRCUlT. 7 Livcrpool, Maich 27. CROWN COURT. The Court opened at nine o'clock. MALICIOUSLY WOUNDDIG.—John Kirkham, Samuel Road hurst, William Savage, Charles Dakin, and James Clarke, were indicted for having feloniously assaulted and wounded with a sharp instrument James Jones, with intent to maim, disable, or do him some grievous bodily harm. The jury returned a verdict—Kirkham and Broadhurst Guilty of assault ; and Savage, Clarke, and DakiniNot Guilty. The former were sentenced to eighteen months' imprison ment and hard labour. Mr. WILKINS intimated to his Lordship that ho had been given to understand that it was the intention of the counsel for the prosecution to prefer another indictment for inter ference with the officers of justice in the discharge of their duty. His LonDsutp granted him time for consideration. FORGERY.— Wm. Henry Chapman, 22, was indicted for having uttered a bill of exchange, with intent to defraud Samuel Aston, Mr. Drinkwater prosecuted, and Mr. Tindal Atkinson de fended. Samuel Aston is a capsule-manufacturer, at Bordesley green, near Birmingham, and received by post a letter, dated Lord• street Chambers, Liverpool, 23d May, 184'4, signed William 8011, ordering ten gross of copaiba capsules. Sent the goods; and afterwards received another letter, dated 28th of the same month, inclosing a bill for 291. IBs. 9d., purporting to be signed by W. H. Norcliff and Co., Liver pool, and addressed to Mr. E. Williams. This bill was a forgery. The jury found the prisoner Guilty, but recommended him to mercy on account of his youth, and the belief that he had been an instrument in the hands of other parties. His LORDSHIP NI as of the same opinion. Sentence—Two years' imprisonment and hard labour in the House of Correction. CIVIL SIDE. Mr. Justice Coleridge took his seat upon the bench this morning at nine o'clock. LIABILITIES OF SHAREHOLDERS nr JOLT-STJCK BANKS.- LUCAS V. BUTCHER. In this case Mr. Martin and Mr. Robinson appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Watson for the defendant. Mr. MARTIN stated the facts of the case. Mr. Lucas, the plaintiff, was a gentleman living in the Isle of Man, and the defendant, Mrs. Alice Butcher, was living at Bowness, in Westmoreland. The action was brought to recover 5001., and interest, from May 1843. Mrs. Butcher was sought to be fixed as a partner in the Isle of Man Bank ; and the manner in which she was sought to be made liable was this: —The bank in question was a joint-stock bank, in which her husband was a proprietor, and held fifty shares. He died in 1839, after which time she received the shares, and drew the dividend upon them until 1843, when the bank stopped, and his (Mr. Martin's) claim was that Mrs. Butcher thereby became a partner in the bank, and was therefore re sponsible for its transactions. Mr. Martin then proceeded to dilate upon the law bearing upon the case. The joint stock bank was formed by a deed, in which Mrs. Butcher's husband was a partner, and the Court would lam that an executor, before coming to a dividend, was bound to give satisfactory evidence of title ; and this lady seemed to have taken the usual course, by sending the probate of her hus band's will to the manager of the bank. It appeared from the documents that would be produced, that in 1839 the de fendant was required to pay a call ; and on the 28th of De cember of that year she again wrote to the manager, re questing the dividend to be paid to her. In August of that year the dividend became due ; and upon the Ist of Decem ber, 1840, the dividend, warrant was made out and sent to her. This was transmitted to her through the means of Messrs. Wakefield and Crewdson, of Kendal. Upon the sth of September she wrote to know what price she could get for her 50 bank shares, supposing she sold them. On the 9th Mr. Forbes wrote an answer, stating he considered the shares at that time would not fetch more than 61., or 61. 2s. each. On the 26th she wrote again ; and on the Ist July of the following year another dividend was declared, and sent to her in the ordinary way. In the January following she again wrote, wishing to know if she could sell her shares. From this correspondence it was perfectly clear that she was a partner in the bank. Witnesses were then called to prove these facts. _ _ . _ Mr. WATSON then addressed the jury for_ the defendant, contending that Mrs. Butcher could only be considered as the executrix of another, and not a partner in the bank. The Learned JUDGE then summed up, and the jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 559/. 7s. 3d. MONEY CLUB.—DEBT.—HOOD AND OTHERS n. LANGFIELD. This was an action for the recovery of certain sums of money borrowed from the members of a money club holding its meetings at a temperance hotel, in Portland -street, Man chester, which had been stipulated to be returned by instal ments, but some of which the defendant had failed to pay. Verdict for the plaintiff for 231. 10s., subject to a rule nisi applied for. MIDLAND ClRCUlT.—Warwick, March 27. CIVIL SlDE—(Before Mr. Justice TINDAL.) ACTION FOR LIBEL—SIBLEY V. CHAPMAN. Mr. Whitehurst, QC., and Mr. Hayes were for the plain s tiff; Mr. numfrey, Q.C., and Mr. Miller, for the defendant. The plaintiff is a coach and omnibus proprietor, and, on the occasion of some steeple chases that took place in Southam, in February last, he engaged to carry passengers to and from the ground at the rate of ss. per head. The races being over, an account of them appeared in the Sunday Times, and at the end of that account was the following para graph, forming the libel complained of : " But we cannot close our remarks without exposing as gross an act of coaching rascality' as was ever perpetrated. A fellow of the name of Sibley chartered a coach for the occasion, and was engaged by a party of nineteen to con •vey them to and from the ground for ss. each. The fare was paid at the time of taking places. On arriving at Southern, however, the fellow stopped at a small inn, and coolly observed, that he should stay there about an hour, al though it was then close upon the time appointed for the first race to come off, and the ground was a mile and a half beyond that place. Expostulations being useless, most of the party proceeded on foot, and expected, of course, that at the conclusion of the sport the coach would be in waiting to convey them back; the fellow, however, sneaked off with a fresh load before the second match was run, and the party left behind had to hire other conveyances from Southam to Leamington, a distance of nearly eight miles. We feel it our duty to call the attention of the local magistrates to this gross case of cheating, and trust they will do their duty by punishing the fellow as the law directs." The evidence showed that besides two steeple-chases, which were alone marked on the card, there were two matches, one being between Sir William Don a n d M r . Mitton, for 5001. aside. It was contended, on the part of the defendant, that the coach was not to return till the last match had been decided, while the plaintiff said it was to return after the last race named in the list had been run. The coach leaving at the conclusion of the second race was the occasion of the writing of the paragraph in question. The jury found for the plaintiff—Damages 501. CROWN COURT.—(Before Mr. Justice COLTMAN.) ROBBING A BANK. — Elisha 'George Blaney was charged as an accessory after the fact in the robbery of one hundred 101. promissory notes, stolen on the 4th of January last, from the Warwick and Leamington Bank. Mr. Waddington and Mr. Mellon were for the prosecution ; Mr. O'Brien for the defence. This case, and another connected with it, occupied the time of the Court the whole day. The facts were these. The prisoner had a brother, not now in custody, a clerk in a branch of the above bank, at Warwick. In the month of July, two parcel, containing a number of notes of the above bank, were made up and delivered to the prisoner's brother to put into the pest; they were addressed to Mr. Smith, of Southern. One containing one hundred ten -pound notes, the other three hundred five-pound notes. Only the latter parcel reached Mr. Smith. From the evidence of a man named Archer, it appeared that he formerly lived at Leamington, in Warwickshere, though now residing at 13, Trinity-lane, London. This man stated that the prisoner came to him in April last, at Isling ton, and said he bad something to say of a money-getting concern. This turned out to be an intended robbery of the bank. A man was to go to Leamington, and the prisoner's brother was to hand over 8001. or 1,000/. This was subse quently done, and the property was passed to a firm of the name of Myers, and 1501. received for it. During the time the transaction was going on, the prisoner went by the name of Brown. Archer admitted that he had been in gaol several times. The prisoner was found Guilty, but sentence was deferred. George William Jenkins and Joseph Myers were charged with receiving the notes, knowing them to have been stolen. The jury found Jenkins Guilty, but Acquitted Myers. Sen tence deferred. WESTERN CIRCUIT.—Bodmin, March 27. CROWN COURT.—(Befere Mr. Baron ROLFE.) Joseph Willeock was indicted for having, on the 4th March, at the parish of Lanreath, unlawfully and maliciouslystabbed and wounded Thomas Meitch, with intent to do him some grievous bodily harm. Mr. Oxenham conducted the prosecution. It appeared that a quarrel had taken place between the prosecutor and the prisoner, and that the latter inflicted upon the former two severe wounds with a carving knife. The man was laid up for a fortnight, and the surgeon pronounced that he had been in considor4ble danger. The medical officer at the gaol said that the conduct of the prisoner had been so extraordinary, as to lead him to think he was insane. He was still of opinion that the man was not of mound mind. Mr. Baron ROLFE left it to the jury to decide whether the prisoner was guilty of the charge, or whether he was insane at the time. The jury having consulted for a few minutes, the foreman said—" Our verdict is' Insane.' " The Clerk of Assize having construed this into a verdict of "Not guilty on the ground of Insanity," The Learned Junta ordered the Prisoner to be removed to the gaol. Thomas Pearce, aged 17, was indicted for burglariously breaking and entering the dwelling-house of Thomas Eva, of Truro, and stealing a coat, waistcoat, and trousers. Mr. Oxenham conducted the prosecution. It appeared that the prosecutor was absent from home with his family, and that he left the key of his house in the pos session of his son-in-law, who examined all the doors and windows on the 20th of February, and found that they were properly secured. On the 24th of February he again went to the house, and he discovered that one of the windows had been broken open, and a variety of things were scattered about the floor of the front parlour. The rooms upstairs had also been entered, and the drawers ransacked. Two days afterwards the prisoner enlisted as a soldier at Devonport, and on the following morning, being desirous of paying the "smart money," he pawned some clothes for that purpose. These clothes proved to be the property of the prosecutor, and the prisoner was apprehended. Whilst in gaol, he en tered into conversation with a sailor lad, who was incar..e rated for deserting his ship. The prisoner told this person that he and a man named Coutts had had a spree ; that they went together, between nine and ten o'clock, to the house of Mr. Eva ; and that he (prisoner) was the first to enter. They took away several things, and drank a large quantity of wine and spirits which they found on the pre mises ; and what they could not drink they removed from the house. Mr. Baron Ror.sm told the jury that, as there was no evi dence, except the prisoner's own statement, that the house had been broken into at a time which would make the offence au act of burglary, it would be better for them to consider whether or not he was guilty of the minor offence of house breaking. The prisoner, not being aware of the importance which the law attached to the particular time necessary to be proved in cases of this nature, might have misstated the hour through heedlessness or inadvertence. The jury found the prisoner Guilty of housebreaking, and he was sentenced to eighteen months' imprisonment; the Learned Judge observing that he should have inflicted upon him a more severe punishment, had it not been proved that there was no person in the house at the time the robbery was committed. (Before Mr. Justice ERLE.) Thomas Laing was indicted fur the commission of a rape on the wife of a man named Westlake, at the parish of Davidstow. Mr. Moody prosecuted, and Mr. Slade defended. The prisoner and the husband of the proseentrix were small farmers, living on terms of the closest intimacy, and fib! Affonee was :chid to bovo boon oomtnitted nitiht Mrs. Westlake and the prisoner were returning from market. The trial occupied several hours, and the result was looked for with some anxiety. Mr. Justice ERLE having summed up the evidence, the jury turned round to consider their verdict. After the lapse of about ten minutes, the foreman said, "We can't agree, my Lord, here's one sticks out fur the capital offence." The Learncd JUDGE intimated that the law h"ft abolished capital punishment in cases of rape. The jury then retired, and after an absence of an hour, re turned into Court with a verdict of " Guilty of a common asaault."—Sentenced to two years' 4rnprlsonment. Saturday, March 28. Henry Barrett was indicted for killing Ann Barrett, a'ias Ann Fowell, by throwing a poker at her head on the 10th of December, at Saltash, Mr. Saunders was for the prosecution ; Mr. Whyte for the priFoner. • The prisoner and the deceased lived together as man and wife, and the present case was one of the numerous in stanees in which death has been the result of a quarrel be tween persons in their condil ion. The man, it seems, was drinkir a , at a public-house a n d th e woman went to fetch h i m home, but he refused to go, and desired her to leave him. In the course of a few minutes, however, they went home together, and shortly after a scream was heard by people residing In the same house, and also by the landlady of the public-house, which was opposite the prisoner's lodgings. Several persons immediately entered the room, and seeing that the deceased had received a very severe wound on the head, they exclaimed, " Good Good ! who has done this ?" The prisoner replied that ho had done it, but he aftewards appeared very sorry fur what had passed, and on a subse quent occasion he stated that he did not intend to strike the deceased with the poker, but to throw it at the crockery on the dresser. The woman died about a fortnight after the occurrence. The deposition :made by the deceased before the magis trate was put in, and it appeared from this statement that the poker struck her as she was in the act of preventing the prisoner from destroying the crockery—that the blow was the result of accident, and that her husband was tipsy at the time. Mr. WHYTE addressed the jury for the prisoner, and the Learned Judge, in summing up the case, left it to the jury to decide whether the prisoner intended to strike the deceased, or whether the blow was accidental ? The jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. (Before Mr. Baron Rocrx.) Mary Pearce, a widow woman, of most respectable appear ance, was indicted for having, on the 18th of July, whilst in tl e employ of the public service at the post-office at Strat ton, embezzled one penny, which had been intrusted to her in her official capacity. Mr. Rogers and Mr. Poulden conducted the: prosecution. Mr. Slade defended the prisoner. It appeared that the prisoner was deputy-postmistress at Stratton, and evidence was given to show that in three in stances, besides that mentioned in the indictment, the stamps had been removed from letters received at that office, and affixed to other letters for which a penny had been paid to the prisoner ; and it was inferred that she had appropriated the money to her own use, Mr. SLADE, on the part of the prisoner, urged that it was most probable the frauds in question had been committed by some other person who had access to the post• office. Several witnesses were called to speak to the prisoner's character, and the Learned Judge summed up the case. The Jury having returned a verdict of Guilty, Mr. BARON ROLFE said he had a painful duty to perform, but it was absolutely necessary in cases like the present that the offenders should be severely punished. The sentence was, that the prisoner be transported for seven years. The prisoner was in great distress when removed from the bar. It appeared that she was the mother of three children, and her husband had been dead eight years. Bethuel Hutchings, aged sixty-nine, was charged with a similar cffence, at Bude, on the 14th of July. This man was said to be a cousin of the prisoner in the last case. The Jury retired to consider their verdict, and after an ab sence of about half an hour they found the prisoner Guilty. The Learned JUDGE said that, notwithstanding the ad vanced age of the prisoner, he was bound to sentence him to seven years' transportation. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. GUILDHALL. Mr. Thomas Reginald Kcmp, of No. 11, Abchurch lane, appeared before Aldermen Gibbs and Farncombe, in answer to the Joint Stock Companies' Act, for un lawfully acting as director on the 19th of December, 1845, and the sth of January of the present year, of the Metropolitan Railways' Junction Company, not holding at the time in the said Company a single share, whereby he had rendered himself liable to a penalty not exceed ing 201. `Mr. Wire appeared for the defendant ; and Mr. George Jones, the chairman of the meeting of the shareholders recently held at the London Tavern, attended to conduct the case. The court was crowded by gentlemen inte rested in the decision. Although the inquiry lasted from half-past twelve o'clock until four, the facts adduced in evidence are very brief. A clerk from the Register of the Joint Stock Companies' office proved that the Company was regis tered on the 10th of July, and on the 25th of October a list of provisional committee-men, signed by the respec tive parties, consenting to act in such officei, and to take a certain number of shares to qualify them for such duties, was alto received at the office, and duly regis tered. In this list was the signature of the defendant. The proof, however, of the defendant's being a director on the day mentioned in the summons, solely depended upon the fact of his having sat with the directors at public meetings of the Company en those days, and ad dressing the meeting in the terms and language of a director. After a lengthened and wearisome discussion, which gave rise to many objections on the part of Mr. Wire, and which were chiefly overruled. Mr. Alderman GIBBS consulted with Mr, Alderman Farncombe, and Mr. Tesgue, the chief clerk, and then observed, that although the inference might be that the defendant was in the capacity of a director at the meet ings alluded to, still there was no legal proof that he was, and accordingly the summons would be dismissed. It was understood that the subject would be again tried in a superior court. WORSHIP STREET. Frederick William Zabell, the elderly German who was charged some time since with having caused the death of his wife by a continuous course of ill-treatment, was plaeed at the bar to-day. It was originally alleged that he actually caused her death by certain blows ; but since the last examination, a post mortem examination of the body has taken place, the result of which shows that typhoid fever carried her off. Under such circumstances the mag;strate said, although it had been proved that the prisocer had adopted a system of brutal ill-usage towards his aged wife, still, as that did not actually cause her death, he felt it his duty reluctantly to discharge him. He was then released from custody. A DESPERATE Unctini.—A youth, twelve years of age, was brought up in custody for having Attempted to bang himself. It appears that his mother, who is a poor widow, has doni everything in her power to bring him up religiously and morally, but that, unfortunately, all her efforts were perfectly useless, inasmuch as he pursued a course of viciousness quite incredible for his years. He contintfally stole from her, as well as from the neighbours, and had actually attempted to stick a knife into her person. 'A few days since he stole some pigeons, when, in order to punish him, his mother locked him up in a room, telling him, at the same time, that he would be transported. Fired with the spirit of contradiction, he fastened his handkerchief to a hook,, in the ceiling, and suspended himself to the other end of it, where le was found in a state of total insensibility, and it was difficult to reanimate him. _ In an to the charge, the little rascal stated that he was determined he would not be transported, so he had tried to hang himself. Mr. BuounuToN considered prison discipline might be beneficial, and consequently remanded him for a week. CLERKENWELL. Several collectors attended with about 900 summonses, to be sigaed by the magistrate, against housekeepers in fur refusin g t o pay the poor-rate. Clerken well parish, A peculiar question was mooted in reference to the legal liability of the parties against whom the summonses were issued to pay two shillings costs of the summons, if the amount sued for was tendered to the collector or col lectors prior to the process being served. Th. presiding Magistrate offered it as his impression that if the party came for.vard to tender payment to the collectors before the summons was served, they could not be legally called upon to pay the costs of the sum mons. The collectors said they were obliged to pay two shillings for every summons signed by the magistrate, and if parties came there to pay, they (the oollectors) would be great auffmrs. Magistrate—Some one may come and tender the money whilst I am signing the summons, which, not being served, they would think it a great hardship to be called upon to pay 2s. costs. lie could not legally call on them to pay if they demanded the strict administra tion of the law. lle suggested that the parish of Clerk enwcll should do as some other parishes did, apply to Parliament for an act or clause to generalise the sum monses, so that the single signature of the magistrate, would have the desired effect. The Clerk said that some parishes did not adopt that course in consequence of a jealousy of compromising themselves with the Poor-law Commissioners. The Magistrate urged the collectors to use immediate means to kave the summonses served upon the parties, who would be legally bound to pay the co , .ts if the pro cess were once served upon them. It was an important question, and the officers ought to be supported in doing their duty. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. A fireman. named Thomas Blntcl•, one of the Well's street station fire brigade, was requilsted to attend before Mr. Hardwick, to explain shy he h , ad called on a foreign gentleman, in Berwick-street, for 2/., his re ward for attending to put out a fire in a chimney in the house. The complainant said he believed a fire did take place in the chimney, but certainly not in any part of the pre mises he occupied. The defendant, however, called on his wife, and asked for 21., which he said was the reward he was entitled to. Complainant sa v the fireman, and the fireman then produced an Act of Parliament, and said that it was his authority for demanding the money. The defendant Blatch denied that he called on the complainant to obtain money. He only wanted to• get at complainant's name, that he might give it to the churchwardens of the parish, whose duty it was to allot the rewards. Mr. HARDwecte said he believed all that the com plainant had stated, and disbelieved nearly all the de fendant's explanation. He was determined to set his face against the system of obtaining money from house keepers by firemen under colour of applying for fire rewards, because he was satisfied that this proceeding was nothing less than a system of extortion. He hoped the churchwardens would take care to disallow rewards, for at least six months, to those firemen who were proved to have been guilty of such conduct. The, parties then retired. •if AND S WORTH. SUPPRESSION OF WIMBLEDON FAIR.—A few days since it was publicly announced that a fair would be holden at Wimbledon on Monday, and two following days. That the inhabitants of the village might not have to complain of any nuisance arising from it, it - w „ arranged that it should take place upon the ve:ge of the common. A fair was held annually f'7,-. -. a full century in this village, but after the pao:,,in of the amended Police Act, which gives the r Lommiss g ioners of Police the power to suppress o down. An ter thah chartered fairs, it was put P !. ' , ern pt was made about two years since to revir- it, but on application being made by the paro „dial authorities at this Court, the sitting magistrate (Mr. Paynter) declared it to be illegal, and co:lscquently it was not holden. On Saturday, Mr. Moson, senior churchwarden, ap peared at this court, and made a statement to Mr. Clive, the sitting magistrate, to this effect :—That a notice had been extensively circulated within and abut the parish of Wimbledon, stating that a fair would be holden on the common on Monday next and two following days. The clergyman and resident gentry were averse to this spe cies of amusement, as they considered it only tended to debauch th 3 minds of both sexes, and create a scene of riot and confusion, as well as bring iato the neighbour hood many loose characters. He had, therefore, been requested to wait upon the magistrate, and solicit his aid in its suppression. He would remind Mr. Clive that, two years since, his brother magistrate decided that the fair was illegal. Mr, CLIVE said he would give the case his fullest attention, and the applicant, having thlaiked the Bench for its courtesy, withdrew. _ . Subsequently Mr. Busain, inspector of the V division, had a private interview with the magistrate, the resalt of which was the issuing of the following instructions to the superintendent of police of the V division:—" I think that the fair held in Wimbledon parish is unlawful, and has been duly declared to be so, and may be dealt with by the police accordingly, without further notice." Mr. CLIVE subsequently stated that it was for Earl Spencer, as lord of the manor, to show that the fair was legal, and as his Lordship did not choose to attend and do so, it must be understood as a tacit admission that there was no claim. GENERAL LICENSING DAY. On Saturday the adjourned general annual licensing meeting for the division of the parishes of St. Paul, Covent garden ; St. Clement Danes, and St. Mary le Strand, was held at the office of the Strand Union, for the purposes of granting and renewing licenses to keepers of inns, ale houses, and' victualling houses, and also for keeping public billiard and bagatelle tables, heron Lord Montford, as chairman, and other county ma gistrates. The several licenses in the parish of St. Clement Danes were renewed without any exception. The Court inquired what steps had been taken by the police in this particular parish to prevent complaints of any magnitude being made against licensed victuallers. Mr. Superintendent Pearce, F. division, replied that whenever he had occasion to summon a licensed victualler before the police magistrates, if the complaint was even dismissed, he caused the officers to make visits more frequently to the establishment, which he found generally attended with the most beneficial results on licensing day to the parties concerned. The applications for licences to keep billiard and bagatelle tables in this parish were granted, the terms of the Act of Parliament being complied with, and no ob jection being made. In the parish of St. Paul, Covent-garden, billiard licences were granted to the Cider Cellars, in Maiden - lane, and several others, some of whom were not licensed victuallers, with the exception of two persons keeping coffee-houses in Upper Wellington-street, against whom complaints had been made on various occasions. The Court then adjourned. EXECUTION IN-ALGERIA.. L' Akhbar has the following graphic account of an execution that recently took place in Algeria:—The de linquents were two Arabs, and their crime assassina tion. The 26th was the day fixed upon. At eight o'clock ♦.31. a guillotine was erected in the place Babel- Oued ; a curious crowd pressed around the red ma chine, which increased as the fatal moment drew nigh. At half-past ten o'clock the vast esplanade was taken possession of. The weather was magnificent. The guillotine, with crossed arms and gaping mouth, awaited its food in the centre of the crowd—a circle preserved with some difficulty by a company of Zouaves. There was something frightfully solemn in this spectacle. The mountains on the horizon were exhi bited in bold relief against a sky of wonderful clearness; the sea, which oscillated between their feet and the shore, was calm and blue; on the other side of the square the garden of Marengo bloomed in all its spring verdure ; and Algiers, crowned with timid spectators, commanded the scene. The two culprits at length arrived, guarded by mounted gendarmes. They walked with firm anti equal steps, without braggadocio, or apparent spasms ; they mumbled their prayers. It is asserted that ose of them several times interrupted his orisons to protest the inno cence of both, but the facts adduced at the trial fully established their guilt. On the arrival of the "patients" at the foot of the scaffold, the executioner made one of them turn his fare towards Algiers, that he might not witness the tragedy about to be performed behind him. In less than a quarter of a minute Bel Hassem-ben. Mohamed has ascended the scaffold, been bound down to the bascule, and lost his head. It was a frightful legerde►amain. " Where is my comrade?" asked Mecaoud-ben-Amed, whilst he was in his turn bound to the plank; and no doubt he found a solution of the terrible enigma, when he saw under his own head, already fixed in tile socket, that of the decapitated Arab grinning at the bottom of the box into which his own was just about to fall. This indescribable moment must have been horrible, for Mecaoud made an attempt to extricate himself ; but a second afterwards axes and heads had disappeared, and the executioner's assistants remained alone on the platform, with their shirt sleeves tucked up, hastily buckling the straps of the basket into which the bodies had been thrown. Six vigorous biskris, in rae•s, then conveyed the basket to the cemetery at a double quick march. A few drops of blood filtered through the osier hurdle, and the guillotine vomited through the fissures of its joists that with which it was gorged. The eager crowd rushed to the instrument to examine it more mi nutely, but the gendarmes kept them at a respectful distance. The Arabs generally die with a stoical in difference. The doctrine of fatalism, " God has willed it," is unanswerable. The other day ten Arabs were hanged (there being no guillotine) at Tltncen, and in the following way :—There was no gallows, and the want was supplied by thursting outside the ramparts the mouths of ten cannons, to which ten ropes were fastened at one end, and the necks of the ten mea to the other, by a slip-knot. It was only necessary to " launch" them into empty air, but the Arabs saved the execu tioner the trouble, and bravely leaped into eternity of their own accord. We most di , trust people who die thus," adds the 'Mbar, " for they have the faith of martyrs, and they sleep in hope, until the voice of a marabout comes and awakens it at the bottom of their hearts." EXPORTATION OF BEE -W ith reference to an order issued by the Lords of the Treasury in September, 1842, on the subject of the exportation of strong beer, the revenue authorities have received a communication from Mr. Cardwell, secre t ar y to the L or d s Commis sioners of the Treasury, stating that he has been com manded by their Lordships to acquaint them that they have authorised the Commissioners of Excise to permit the exportation of bottled strong beer on drawback; in cases containing two dozen quart or two dozen pint bottles, provided the case be properly secured and the quantity of beer exported at any one time be not less than 36 gallons. This order has been communicated to the several departments in London and to all the outports et the kingdom, for the information and future government of the officers of the revenue with reference to the Com missioner's general order, of the 3Cth of September, 1842, founded on the previous order of the Lords of the Treasury on the subject, which, on a memorial, praying for permission to pack strong beer in eases, instead of in casks, authorised the Commissioners of the Excise to permit the exportation on drawback of bottled strong beer packed in cases, provided that the same should be properly secured, and the quantity of beer exported at any one time should not be less than 36 gallons. It will be seen that the former order sanctioned the exportation of the article in cases, instead of only, as was previously the case, in , casks; the order now issued referring - to the quantity only which is to be so packed in each case, no alteration being made in the total quantity to be exported at any one time. with Mr. A. Hope, M.P., had an interview the Chan cellor of the Exchequer on Saturday, at his officicl resi dence in Dowaivg•street, FLANDERS MAIL. BRUSSELS, MARCH 25.—The official part of the Moniteur of this date contains a royal ordinance, by which the Cham• ber is adjourned till the 20th of April next. The ordinance is dated the 24th of March, and signed by Baron de Anethan, the Minister o gustice. ' The average price of wheat in the week ending on Saturday the 21st of this month was 23f. 34c., arid that of Eye 17f. 16"'• BRUSSELS, MARCH 24.—The list of the Ministry has been placed in the hands of the King, together with a pi' , - Eramme. It is thought that Ws slnjesty will receive ?t. Rogier to-day to acquaint him with his determination. Tha IndTendence rays—" It is assured to-day that the Honourable Member for Antwerp (M. Rogier) has agreed with the persons who are to tale office with him on the principles and bas• of their policy. What is stated en the aubjcct allows us la say that those principles are calculated to satisfy all the friends of liberal opinion, and at the same time to be accep table to all reasonable partisans of tht, Catholic opinion." We (the Conrrier Beige) heartily desire that the Indepel?• dance may be right, but we just learn that the programme is drawn up in such terms, that it compromises a combination, in which we find, with pleasure, names which offer all desirable pledges of mediation and capacity. At four o'clock Messrs. de Bi ouckere anti Delfosse entered the Hall of the Chamber of Representatives. They were immediately summoned by a great number of their col leagues, who learnt from these two Members of the proposed Cabinet, that the King did not accept the Ministerial pro gramme of M. Rogier, and that it was all broken off. is, said that three of the conditions of the pro gramme submitted to the King were—the dissolution of the Chambers, the withdrawal of two laws voted by a parlia mentary majority, and, it is said, the dismissal of func tionaries, in case of need they occasioned his M •iesty's refusal. In the debate in theChamlier yesterday, the Minister of P,ub lic Works made a statement which is worthy (:)* notice, as shoe - ing the progress of useful public works. In the year 1835, Belgium possessed highroads of the total length of 73g . leagues, and, in 1845, 1,073 leagues. Two years ago we had only 50 leagues of canals, we have now 183 leagues. We sax nothing of the railways already completed, much less of these which are projected. AUSTRIAN FUNDS.—VIENNA, MARcit 19. 5 per Cent. Meta11ique5.................. 112 1-16 4 per Cent. ditto.... .. .• • • • • • • • . • . 101% 3 per Cent. ditto.. • • ••• • • ••••• • • • • .. 7534 Loan, 1834 154 Ditto, 1839 . 123% Bank Shares •• •••• • • • • • ..... •• • • 1572 • Estcrhazy's Loan ••••••• • • • • •• 57 RAILWAYS. The Northern, or Ferdinand . • 1921( Gtoagnitz •• ••%.••• • • • • • ...... •••• • • • 139 % .• ••• • • • • 11934 Leghorn ..... ............ . • .• 11334 Pest, .. 103% Sienna . 953 y Grosetto ••• • • • ...... •. • ••• • .• ........ 9634 Pestoja • Apenninen Pesth Bride .......... ..... --.lllgemelne Zeittuus, March 22. DUTCH FUNDS.—AMSTERDAM, Mateen 20. Money. Bills. Actual Debt, 234 per Cent .. • . 60 60% bitto, 3 per Cent ••• • • ••• •• • • ..... 72% 73 Ditto, 4 per Cent.• ••••• • • • • •• • • 94% 95 Antort Syndic. 436 per Cent ••••• • • • • . 693( 99% Ditto, 3% per Cent...... Commercial Company, 434 per Cent 165% 166 East India Loan, 4 per Cent.......... Exchange on London, at sight • • • •• 12 25 Two months..• •••••• • • • • • • 12 15 On Hamburgh, at sight • • 35 62 Two mouths.•. ••• • • • .. 35 31 —batch Papers. March 21. HiIIBURGEI BORSENHALLE, Meitcn 20. Bills. Money Austrian 5 per Cents ••••• • • • • ••• • • • 113 Bank Shares • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 1600 Anglo-Russian Loan • Russian 5 per Cont., Hamb. Certificate. 1023( Ditto Ist series Inscription • • . • • • • • . • • • 103 Ditto,flopa and Co., 3d and 4th series- 98 Ditto, in Certificate ••••••••• . • • • • .• • • New 4 per Cent., Hope and Co. ••• • .• 89% Ditto Stieglitz .•••••••• • • • • • • • • 8834 . Spanish New 5 per Cent ••• • • Ditto 3 per Cent .. Anglo-Portuguese Loan, 236 per Cent.. Dutch Actual Debt, 234 per Cent ••• • • 59 Ditto 3 per Cent... • Polish New 4 per Cent. Joan, 1844.... 81 Anglo-Danish Loan, 3 per Cent .. 8 734 National Bank Shares • • • BELGIAN FUNDS.—BRUS2ELS, MARCLI 28. Actual. Debt, 23% per Cent • - Rothschild's Loan, Five per Cent .. Loan of Thirty Millions, Four per Cent• •• • Ditto Three per Cent.. ..... ........... Ditto Thirty-seven Millions, ditto • • . Ditto, ditto, 1840 .• •• • ..... • • •• • • ••• • • • 101% Ditto,ditto,l842. Ditto, 1844... •• • • 99% Ditto, 1836- ••••••••••• • • • • • • • • • • • 28 14 Ditto, 1838 Ditto of the City, 1832 . . Ditto, 1843 •• • • •• • •••• • • .• • • 100 Bank of Belgium ...• ••.•••• • • • • 905 —Brussels Papers, March 25. PRUSSIAN FUNDS.—BERLIN, Miacn 17. Bills. Money. St. Schuld Sch., 3 1 ,6 per Cent •••• • • • ••• • • • 97 34 97 Pruss. English Bonds, 1830, 4 per Cent.. Foreign Exchanges. . . . Exchange on London, £1 Sterling, 3 Months. 6 25% Hamburdt, 300 Marks, 2 Months. 149% Paris, 300 fr., 2 Months • • 803 Two months. • • • • • • • . . e -Universal Prussian Gazette, March 18. 10E3 DUTCH MAIL. THE HAGUE, MARCH 25.—1 n the sitting of the Second Chamber of the States General to-day the two projects of law were agreed to ; Ist. for an extraordinary advance of money to the Charitable Society, by a majo rity of 49 to 1 ; and 2d. that for increasing chap. ix. of the budget of the expenditure for 1846, unanimous'''. THE HAGUE, MARCH 26.—1 n the sitting of the Second Chamber to-d,y, the report of the Committee for revising the standing orders was discussed. It was resolved that the report should be agreed to by a majo" rity of 46 to 7, and the debate on the several proposed modifications is fixed for to-morrow, and each sepa rately. NIMEGUEN, MARCH 24.—We are sorry to observe en increasing desire in the inhabitants to emigrate to America, the motives for which we will not inquire into, but we think it our duty to warn those, who intend to leave their own country, of the danger to which they expose themselves, and the privations they may expect to suffer. Hundreds of every rank have reached the place of their destination, with the loss of all their re sources which they possessed, and are plunged into the greatest distress. ZWOLLE, MARCH 24.—We learn from Zulpben, that a baker of that town had purchased American flour to the amount of 1,000 florin 4; the American wheat-flour cost him 12c. per lb., free to Zutphen ; while our own flour costs there 16c., and h're 20c. per lb. TURKEY. AUGSBERG, MARCH 24.—There have been fresh coin' bats between the Montenegrins and the Turks in the neighbouring district, Antivari, which have been occa sioned by an attach of the Montenegrins on the village of Tabre. We shall give the particulars to-morrow. THE INDIAN PRESS. - - The conduct of a portion of the Indian press cannot . be too strongly condemned in reference to the r ecent actions on the Sutlej, as well as in connexion with the fearful disaster that befel our arms in Affghanistan sous time Since. There can be no doubt that the statement s made in these papers—many of which have an enormous circulation among the natives--have been indirectly the cause of several of the reverses sustained by our troops , and it may be also the cause of the Seikh invasion. Ai l anti-English spirit pervades the whole tone of the jour nals in question , and it might be d o ubt e d w h et h er they are wr:tten by natives of this country, so violent are their attacks upon every act of our policy, so e ager are they to point out to friend and foe the week points of ou r territory. It is stated that these journals are the pro perty of native merchants and native princes, and 01 14 that they are concocted by renegades or Americans, av sisted in their wretched task by the egotism or the anger of British-Indian officers in actual service. If so, the anomaly is explained, and the treachery of the writers accounted for. The last thing that should be done in a free countrf is to fetter lite expression of public opinion ; but whe n the mischief caused by these anti-national publication s is taken into account, there is hardly a man in the cool' munity who will not look on a check upon them as th e least of two evils offered for adoption. It is time for the India Company, therefore, to bestir itself in the matte r+ to let indigo bags and bales of cotton lie s ide by slu e for a while with sacks of sugar, chests of spices, and Wi ll their attention seriously to the modification, it not t e extirpation, of that canker in the very heart of their so: vereignty in Asia. The Marquis Wellesley made soc u stringent regulations as prevented much ill from Iva!' ing through these organs of intelligence. The Indus Company have not, therefore, to establish a precedent 13, the case ; and, consequently, they need not, in surpre; ing tlis moral and political nuisance, incur any Pu ba t odium in the matter. At any rate, it were well th. something was done in regard to it, and done sPeec li ., l ii The risk is enormous, and the injury that may reg' from inaction is incalculable. Observer. ROBBERIFS ON CIRCUIT.—A reat many t he robberi it is said no less than eleven, have t een committed at re One town of Dorchester during the star of the judges the. One person lost his seals, a second his , Watch, a constable of Swanage had his pocket picked of above 3/ • a traveller of the name of Kennison, who resides at Sherbo ' rne, was ro b bed by two women of 404 in cheques and cash ; and the cler k v Air. Hodges, barrister, had his pocket picked on Me nd ,‘ s '. night shortly after the rising of the Crown Court, of 39/..1 u 0 i 18/. of which was his own maney. The vigilant policeho the town have not yet succeeded in detecting any t offenders. BIRTHS At Cardiff, the wife of Mr. D. Tieodrnatt, of a daughter. of SOD. On the 27th inst., at Futney-heath, Viscountess Chelse a, On the 16th last., at Dublin, the lady of G. Poulett Bingham, ..." 4 " of a dauhter. On the g 20th inst., at Brixton, the wife of Mr.Moutmorency Vivant Stokes, of a son. On the 23d inst., at Brighton, the lady of Capta!n W. C. Stather• Bom On thbay Army, of a daughter. e 25th inst., at Clapham-rise, the lady of George Simpson , Esq 0 ., of a dauhter. dnug n h t t l e i r e . 2sth g inst., the wife of Dr. Ogler W ard, of Kensington, of A On the 26th inst., in Wimpole-street, the lady of John Bea, Esti.. of a son. On the 26th inst ,in Radnor place, Hyde-park, the wife of Ed war Houndle, Esq., of a daughter. .AfARRIED. On the 2Gth inst., at Kendal, Herlizrt Broom, Esq., of the Inner Temple, barrister-at•law, to Ellen Thornthwaite, eider daughter at the late Jahn Thomson, Esq., M.D., of Leeds. PIED. On the 25th ult ., at Santa Cruz, Teneriffe , Emma , Wif e -re llolo T. Thomrson, Esq., surgeon. On the 20th inst., at Marseilles, Mary, wife of E. Hayes, EC; Ou lb. 20th inst., at Cheltenham, the Rev. Thomas B. laget A.M., Vicar of Evington, Leicestershire. On the 21st inst., in Leadenhall•street, Mr. J. T. Grey, aged 56 ' On the 21st inst., Mr. James (Ailine, of Loudon. On the 25th inst., Elea nor , r e li c t of Thomas Hopkins , Esq'' ° Hans-place. On the. 25th inst., Price Wiims, sq., of ShrewsburY• e On the 26th in.it., at Upper Tootin E g, the Itc. Satnu 1 Beckwith, Rector of Holy we ll- cum - cum Rants, aged 44 On the 27th inst., Mrs. Wayte, the wife of Mr. W a y te, of / a e church-street. ------- - .ondon : Printed and - Published by 3'URDO YOiIN4, of No. 1 19 Strand, Printer, at The Sun (hike, No. 112, Strand, in the Preen' of the Savoy, In the Ceuta , of juidi gcscx, zd ow i ji y, garc N. ISO. t • A t 4 Tire a2d be mad o thlock,Trail at 7 o'clock Tha Trah o'clock. The Hell it 2 o'clocl The lirer Rut at 21: The Trai The 2'30 7 The Trai 10 I , T he T 1, 10 r ' „ 4, 11 addit "11, at 6 The T ra j 1p 4 0 A.m. On and s , anibridge e lited, and sent, parti, AanYr tiro itatiuns, o litter the General R ~( 311 and + rain, for t UA dail y, Past 6 0 , , t i , lll l , l)etiti Exeter Itillous, 2 In cons Will leas, Il aidenhe jurtlle 11011 day ,_ 8 ° D reeeiv Itor 1 , 4 r rent Applie 4kilWay' __l7th I? ---______ NA This K The ass AGese ( )lee tab of 4t. in for tern The the NI Elkin s ,ach t\ p g 4.100( The 410 Let Tel Gri 1 Int THE SUN, LONDON, MONDAY EVENING, MARCH 30, 1846.