The Sun. — London, England, 1805-02-12 00:00:00

on tile 26th or December, altireited .:11 1 10re to M. Cevallos, couched in terms of unarcntintable bold: n ese, in 'which - he repeats Hi demand's,' • In Mr. Freres Noie'of the Stts of February, though he knew The Stibsidiary4reaty of Spain 'with France avat eoncludeil in September, he couples it with the armaments, and demansis an ultimatum on these.sub. jes'As in the most decided langoage. In 'spite of the' 4o phistry of . the Right Honotteable Ge ntleman 'who had'cohsavooredO'o shew that - there" was no egrets. trek between Great .Britain and Spain, recognizing the Neutrality of the later .Power, yet 'what is there.that , can constitute an agreertiert this shies not .? If in discossirso you state certain conditions without which yoo will' not agree, it iS surely irn. plied, that if those coniiitirmi are not ViOiated the s corripki formed,' Now in t h e s con fet e nce t h at Lord I'hswkesi)ury hid With M. D'A oduaga, this was, precisely the case. In a subsequent, pitch •Mr. Frere gives An itecoma of two conver. sations With the Prince of Peace. II pressed stveral paints, which' he afterwards Made the subject of a fotinal.Note to the Spanish Court ; to - which he received' no answer, aril . on whch. the Right HOO. Geotleman had commented most severelyi-- If this was -SO ..ditirftklAt(lty, why disi'not Lord H wkesbury• set. M. D'Ahduaga t+ml` tail hint , and repeat to Mr. Frere his poSitive instruc. tions ? In ois Note to Mr. Frere, from M. Ceval. los o 'dated olie !sod of March, 'IBO4, he adopts the langisilseof Mr. Freres Note of the 18th of Feb. Boa intimates that the PritiSti Goferothent.had re. capsized the. Neutrality'of Spain on .etarrain terms. ~ln the dispatch from,Mr.. to' Lord Hawkes. bury, of the iSth of .April, in which. this Note. is inclosed, he.. " At there , is ..nothing. • " in any Note of mini; which could be brought for.. , " ward as a foundation for ..sucb a _conclusion,' I " have noi thought it .worth, while :to' enter any protest • in , answer to. Ms CevallosN insinua. 6 ' titan." It certainly was Mr. Ftere's duty to protest against this assertion ; it was his duty", for the Baked his own credit, for the honour of his Country, and for the security of Spain.. Mr. GRItY COUld not express hit indignation at his conduet in. not so doing, in language .sufficiently strong to do j ost i ce to his feelings, fie compared it to the cite of a man who having quarrelled with his neigh. boor, allowed him to imagine that the breaCh was LcAled, and, of , caturse, to meglett the Be. ccssary provigion for his defence, while he him. self .was busily employed in feeicg Counsel, suns.. moning witnesses, and using every means .of suring success. But, to, this • remissness, '.which in this case attached to Mr. Frere,, and during the whole of the NegotiatiOn to Lord Haselsesbuty, was to be attributed the ‘V;IC- in which we were is • plunged; And .the dishonour by which 'our national charader was stained, in M. IMnduaga's Note she terms on ,which it was imagined the British Government would consent to the. observance of Neutrality were distintily Stated ; if to these, terms Lord Has kesbory made no objctiion, the infe. rende was clear that they were coosentedto. Front January 2i,` to the time Lord Hats keshury went out of office s no dispatches appeared. At that period a tattion, .'as it had been called, combined; the Administration was Amended mach in the same way asi bills were sometimes artiended in that House, and tat carry on the simile, ,he loved that. House would soon exercise the power of ropealioxisjhus did Lord. Hawkesbury rerrotve; - wittier 'artri 'ter Word, retaining; no doubt, io his dying moments; the most pacific disposition; at least there did not exist a single line .farther to slisprove such a • dispo. aition, and 'it was probable:that the old pro Verb,: " silence gives cansent i os veltiftiA in this c ase . Then began Lord llarrowhy'a . Administration, in the first 'part of 'which a similar remissness pre's4i l N , ), whids was afterwards aggravated by steps of the most. unjustifiable haste and vio. fence s With regard to the order given by :Lord' Harenwhy to l‘thaire4l C ou hran t , • fin hi s ..receiviqf inrclligen6e that' the Sitsnish Fleet wits arming to 'semi, 'td• blockade. that port, it was perfcitly joatinable. Two dispatches existed of ale date of 39th . September, -from Lon Hatc raivby- to Frere one . containing oseensible, the 'other private,' bistros . ..lions; - both warranting him to break off: Negotiation, and' Olt Madrid, If his oitirtands fir the disattning the ls;panish s ships Were not. complied with. ,To the Note which Mr. B. Frere a'ddr'essed on, this-aobjest, to the Spanish Goseromenr, he' received what he chooses to term 411 IliNtiettkloktitY answer,'hut which certainly contains as conTlete a satislakflinn; 4it language can convey. It stottd, that .„ whate 'oer information' the British Governrosnt might have received, yet that the ar. ITtaiW:n t hut been trifling, aitd- that• it should' Io fad. it had ceased ost that time.— That Mr. B. Frere thought thisloply 'satisfactory,' apio;ats dearly from bit remaining at Madrid, , tY ilk h ooier wise he could pot haVe dune without dis. obeying his' instrations. On. the ,29th September mi.-Fete received iristruCtioos to make further re pre tenta t ions tni the tnt)jed at the Armarnents, that is on whit. no longer existed. lie ditiXo, and the re. ply was an utterdi,selalming of all Armatoent jto.• tritttts tt)Grat Britain', stating the improbability of out+ a thing ie:ter the agreement by which the Neu. tiality hsti been acknowledged by Gteat Britain. Mr. Fiera, than, for . the first time, denies the tx,istence of any stick agreement, or recogrozancts, thcmgh in a letter to Lord Har. xowtiy hail spolssn of it, and he asserts the enormous, propo,ition thst Gress Britain has tight to declare or tiny Armament that SpAi n tittiy ri6ice, for Whatever toroose. He theo required `'that the Slianibh hO j'laeed on the 3ame footing on which they were be.. fore the, Coovetation, and'Ort . no .o..conot that any thould tie. afterwords mtle, to theiili In tfic cf !.!ipaits to compt ; , ilr:toanded Iris PESpOttl, Safely Mr, :Prete roust liaise etveetleo the boutois toovidch instroftians aOthositedbiin , . to proceeds, - there was- no - cat tar nis oirirs ! pt TOCtiouing, noless o , irr theinteritirosha received advice of the, tinfOrtonate emit of theseizore of the Spas ; rriimtes t event indeed' don'oiy tinfortmate ; sit the loss of so no . '.'or knots of Hunan beings ; - lid, inAhl flfaiii on'Britith good . e ! faith and honour s r4,titngth Rtsiports w'el't granted it, Wit; Ft't re's bigertCand 'tCfibitt:rtfeTte4o;' and so t he ,lc,ilessinia t ion hiolefsL be , lit:try-With • It'ratos Iffitdrid t s a n d thelt'otvii r liogrieirs he! ssitoixd . S*9 ittcOissc further explanation, ren4od. ell Mr. C,Or it scene in The 71;eoth, where Sir Lticiits U'rrigger,ll) a disputi in which his friend 4cr-44 i§ engaged; shuts his ears to all aceornmoda lion, exclaiming; " It is a very pretty quarrel as it Stands, motif you say any more you will only spoil it." He 'had sheten how much, blame at.. tached. to Mini;eters for their indecision, in an early part of the Negotiation, as to their, .po. licy' with regatd *to Spain, and for the shameful reserve to that Country with respect to their intentions ; but the last violent. outrage committed, 'in the seizure of the frigates, filled op the mta sure of their ioicittity. On the, very day that Government :bed received advieet. from Admiral Cochrane, soiling the" arenarneets Ferrol, did they give :Eerie • unjust and infantries orders,' He was far from, insinuating any thing ag e tiest the gal lant AdMiral, -but a number of ,causes might ieflu. ace his opinion ; eontradiaory information was received trot - 104 Edward Pelle w Duff. There could be no'dotibt that the . preparations.ar Ferrol -,vere intended for Biscay i Certhagena was ravaged by disease, and at Cadiz, 'there were no stifles of any description. It the. armament, was hostile, why was it discontinued''— Feance would not willingly have consented to the discontinuation in that. case. A wide distieEtion'ekas to be noted between justifiable precaution,' such A - that • at •Fer. rol, and unjustifiable precautioe, or rather hostility, such as the detention of the Spanish frigates, a pro. ceeding which afforded the most flagrant instance of a • violation 'of every Law of Nations that the annals. of yiolence and outrage could furnish., After several 'more observations, which our limits will .not permit us to detail, Mr e Ca E.Y moved an.Aanendment to the Address,: which. contained a recapitulation of all 'the. arguments and assertions which he had used in his speech against the. conduit of Government in tbe Negotiation with Spain, and which therefore it will be unnecessary to repeat at .length. Lord C AST‘4I REAG II felt no ,necessity to fol. low the Hatt. Gentleman through all his details and arguments, when he recolletted the able and ani mated .speech made'by his Right Hon. Friend:who opened the Debate. Of whatever blame could be lin puled to the Government for their conduit. towards Spain, he was very ready to take his full share. . He was.happy to find the Hon. Gent.'agreed with Go. Verplll4:llt on the construction to be put on the Treaty of Sr. nektons°, Indeed, he went .as far en this subjea as could be wished by any one ;, he allowed,. that no Treaty going to the length that this dues 'could ,be called inoffensive, When fhe Hon.. Gentle.. man had made this allowance, lie was surprised to find hihe follow it up by 6liscr ving, that he coneidered it tyould have been highly equine for this Conntry to have obliged Spain to come to some distinel ex. planation. He was more surprieed atehis, because the Hon. GentleManagreed to the policy .of keeping Spain neutral, so much so, that he ceneeived a sub sidy of three million" annually not too gteat a price to pay :for Spanish Neettelity. Poo, what increased his surprise to its greatest height was, that . the nourable Gentleman, after commiserating the uutor ornate and dependeoe.eituation of Spain, could think it expedient. to press for an expknatieu which moat have driveo her ,into a war with one Power or ano— ther. The Hon. Gentle t n e eseeorneteenso cher when Lord Hawkesbury sent his first instruteiens Frere he should: have. been prepared to eklYe whether, if the pecuniary eucceurs svereeffoeded.we should deceit it a just causo e feran,imetteeliete war hot this Would depend orecircumstarices-which could only be ascertained it rsiledricl e and could rtes bet-un seen. Among other omissions with which Govern.. ;Tient had been charged, was that of the No.ces of M. Anduaga to the Secretary of State ; they were of little authority- 4 being without date and signatur 4 *** Nothing :too ~was so fa;al to, the cause of peace, as a, double Negotiation, Mr. Frere having been instructed how to stn, Madrid was tile. proper thee. ire for the discussion, The Hon. Gentleman had in timated, that in the eunfereeces, whieleLordHa Niece bury had held with M. D . 'Anduaga., n kind of agree. 'tent was tacitly allowed with regard to the condi. tions of Neutrality; but this idea originated in the misapprehension of the Spenish Ambassador.; With regerre to ;the substitution of, pecuniary sue court, for a ettntineeot of troops one vessels, tweiould by no ine.sl.» agree, .that a nation w hich Itad, covenanted with another to afford moderate 800. Court, Was at liberty to convert chest succours into money, without.. the consent of the Vuwer against Whom the btleemtllS Were ' to.be employed. B y con 'vetting the aid into money, : those against whom it was to be turned were deprived of those means of attacking:and aeizieg it which they would .Itae& if it were applied in the:shape of:ships tied men, It was alloWed.by the.iineeCeentlemen, that in.the first instance there :was ,sufficient ground. for brioging mattees, directly to the point ,at Peace pr War.: Con sequentlyt if 00.G : ovum - tient had. done. nothing. to give up this 'tight, it still remained. It was clear, that as far its related to the coudutt of the Guettn. men; at home, nothing: had been dune that,could be construed into . a resignation 'of the right. ,In the whule,of the, transactions -with Simi's, the tight had never been., suffered to emerge ; ,s,)d ~ , rd Hartaw. by, in ; his iestroCtione to feet. 1 to tiring the question, to the last trial, showed clearly that he eorteidered the right as ricver once 103 c sight of. It', therefore, Mr, Frere had dine any thing ilt 41 , 44 drid, any thing amounting to in egteemeorof this nature, ,he.. must have doe: •scriri direct violation of his instruC'eimes...' 'He ',wet :proceeded. to thew from leIG - "Etereis pielpetches, that he' had 'con. etantly kept in.vieecethis pair of his inetroelions, and ibac:,he ,had. altvays considered, it oil A. inu q essential 'point to givc no pledge or rogagmimt_ which would bind his -Majesty, to tOVett. what be always considered as an.uneertain and unsub. ;Waal Neutealiiy. , He then proceeded to thew, ehatie wati equally wromg•to E4potie that Mr.' Bi Frete .aeknowledged - suett act egreemeni'eor Con» VentiP ' n. Ilk 'his 'Natter to M. ccV41103,. an : winch 4161;$n1 , thi word. Qnnvention, It expreatlY denied cheat; the Neutrality- of , Spein had ever isereag teed 400,pr even mentioned itt day ot the communications :IrOco Mejoesty.! a. Minister, 34,-al to giv etrceoutO 133tflal is would lee trio/nixed. ell 00.114 d-heat, Igo, pt.ts4ll , !tOr our pArt, t,tntsutylvtt to' nothing none than ethe l seretement ?of leehtlontlit toes em wlt t icta we, ee ten el „coriseeat foibeseence e from We( foteehe peesent, ieniiktc enter tout Negoeietioes on Otiter .4ut neNer, h a d 4n y thing been sain t that r0r,11,1 vtintemenee to tire hope or seer teipening a Ncutr4. llty sn nearly Con-idled with our mortal Enemy. Mr. B. Frere considered the of" between. us'and Spain only,a suspension of hostilitiea ; and, ehere fore, when he used the word COnvention,.it was in , a very different sense, from that .which some Gin. ; tleitien opposed. The mere assent, of Spaio .to these primary conditiOns of forbearance was not . ..suffieieot to constitute ,an, agreement . of Neutrality,. npr could it be enetled by Spain that,we,would give so great a boon, for such inadequate conces shine, _if. silence were to be construed into can: sent on our part, it Might es well be argued that ; ,Lerd Hawkeibury's sllence gave consent to M. Anduaga's construaion, of the 'Treaty of St. Ilde. ,fonao. Surely it would not be said, that every thing that was not formally contradi"Cted, was there.e fore admitted and recognized.' But even if a formal , agreement had ; existed, it must necess ar ily follo w: that any deviation from the terms of that Agree.. meet would.leeVe us at liberty to go to War. The coodua of. Spain with .resPeti to the Armaments in Ferrol was a area breach of • the Agreement, if such an Agreement had existed, inasmuch as it was contrary to the first condition required. He agreed, that, Spain was forced into the transaaions we corn. plained orby France._ That consideration was the cause of all our forbearance : but when there was, reason to think that France was about eo exit its tyrannio influence further, to drive Spain into a general . War against els, and that the ar mament preparing Iby Spain was deinged to carryereinfarcements to her Foreign Possesaions, to render them snore secure from us in the event of a War, it became our duty to take care t thit if we were, to go to War with, Spain, , we . -should, not have to commence-Hostilities under circumstances of such disadvantage. The arguments .stiltich. the Hon. Gentleman used on'this subied Went counter 'to the whole language of the Spanish Govetriment. That (lovernment allowed the existence of the, Anna. 'tient, and the disturbances in Biscay were assigned as the cease. to, which, objet the forces were .ap., .plied, when, . from the condua pOrsued by His -11(Nesty's Gevernnaent, it became necessary. to. abandon the Expedition. Repeated notice had laeen ; given toS4)ain, •and every cart had. .been taken on, our side ,to prevent the effusion of blood, and to avoid laoatile .collision ; : notice had been giveli of the removal of ships of war from- ooe port to another ; and if notice was, not, given of the intention to detain the treasure ships, it was, as Lord Harrowby . very properly, said, becauae the 'corn. MoDiCeitiOn would be useless to Spain,,if,it did not reach that Country in time ; and. the design would be rendered abortive if it did, The•tvhole essence of the instratiens given to Mr. Frere was to oh. taro security the condoa of Spain, and endea. Your, b y a ll consistent means, to bring the NegOti. ation to an amicable issue. But while Anduaga prornlsed a strit and:faithful Neutrality here, Bei. f i s h Ships were seized in the,Ports of Spain, and „a Declaration. of War published at Madrid. [ 4 laud cry of bear krar! from both sides.. Indeed, through t he wh Ile Negotiation, M. Anduaga did nothing more than .go over what had already been diackeeled with Mr. Frere, at ,Madrid, with thia diffoTnee, that M. ,Anduaga fell into some or'eatakes. Thus, whatever reasoning was contained in his,Note, War was declared. by Spain on the ground of her al. fiance. with France ; and on e that, ground only. The substance of her Convention ,with Franoe was, that the should put the Government of that Country.in,possession of all her Resources ; and no gr'eafer proof need, be required how much Spain is under the dominion of France,' than the apprehen. • elan which she had of the danger of disclosing the terms of the Convention. He therefore . thought himself fully borneout, when they sat downin the full conviction that the influence of France was ,tjia cause of 'the War which this Country had most studiously and perseveringly endeavoured to avoid. Lard ?'EMPI.E allowed that-. this Country had a - right to-demand a disclaimer of the Treaty of St, Ildefonso, or to declare War on the refusal Of that disclaimer. But the point ought to have ha m , brought tOll decision. If the ditelaitper had been refused, and a War had,arisen in conieqoence, we should ut least he at Wat upon just grounds, with the consideration of policy superaddedi and ha trusted that in every. War between this Country. and Vrance, in which , it would be a ,question whether Spain should he made e party, it would not be merely a question of right but a question of po. licy Also. Lord Hawkesbury did not say to Mt. Frere, that the, grant of, the stipulated succours would be made a ground of War, he.only instruaed Mr. Frere to inform the British ..Catnnumders' of the sailing of those succours that they, might,be in: ..tercepted. It was said the reason for Lord Hawke*. bury not 'arrayering the. Notes. of lA. Anduaga' was because the Negotiation was carrying on . at 7 Madrid ; and.how was it carried on there ? There were four dispatches, from the Secretary of State to ,Mr. Frere at Madrid, the first 'of which said no. thing ; the two next contradiaed each other• - and tire fourth amoonte4 to a declaration of war. Thui the Secretary had done his duty at Madrid,' not in . a more commendable way than he had in Londtin,-- lie denied, that when . .pollc,r did a.coun. try to aa irr,iii4;4tok; that country was at liberty ;o withohl its ,decision on the principle, and to keep the right, of w.sr in its pocket. When conditions were, proposed, the non.cempliance with which wai to be followed, by immediate hostilities, was it not naturally supposed, that to comply withtheiiwould oisore forbearance and Neutrality ? likagreed th'e Subsidy, may 1;g a,cape of war, as it was in lieu of the soccours ; but he 'contended there was - an agree. mertt, ,and ,that the voluntary 'mention of the tens convention by Mr. B. Frere, boUnd tes to resped the Neutrality of. Spain, ,He maintained, :Oaf the diet armament in Ferrol nuglft to, have removed X ll M4rtJsictrs, and .he' : e c e Qr. :t n t:e ' J 1 : 1 of :tilt leigates..aod the preaince of keqing the I\iegntiptiorkitill open. He thought ,the pvineiples -Couottli gbitotlontil, anti its chatilti.,l ' grace‘ by. the .manner in which th e Ni had hew Cornleded., 7 t e l e tau.) ,st;lFett - ti law 44 . ita!'i.uos Vt alEistEP:44, j .11iPtieti ~1441,fue. %V irs there Wei no Cribunal to .` - 9 t o appeal w for juc e , . . far_ther.than, as every natlan Wal eapable of tlc>hig juitice , to itself:: The. rules Qf . these laws ar - 4 from natural: justice; but _there Was no statute. book of thorn,- no rectird, farther titan as they were found in the writings of learned men, and the praftice of civilized nations. This law of every case arose from ,the circumstances of the tr3tlSaaloo taken altogether. It was admitted anal! sides t h at the Treity of Sr. Ildefonso was a ground of War , if it shotild not have been relinquished on demand. Th e : Qoptingent vacs equally a ground of war, particu larly as . the Convention was entered into Without on knowledge, and was nevercommunicated to us, Lb° its amount is now pretty well known through other. channels. The Learned Gentleman went on to ef* gue.the departure of Spai n from the system of N a. trality in a multitude of •instances,' partieularlyiii allowing to France the use of her ports: and ar sena '' and . in permitting the passage of ,French But what bee considered the principal feature of the case was, the repeated and particular notice had been.given of Our intentions is the conditioits we required were not complied with: argued'that.such notice superseded the necessity of a i, claration ; and that a formal Declaration was seblora waited for in the recent wars of Europe. Mr. WINDH44II wished to deliver hit se l' timents ; but in consideration of the late ness of the hour, and the, number o lGentieitien wh'' In tended to speak ; be thought it would be better 3 0 • journ the - Debate ; he moved the adjournment acd cordingly.—(llere there . 14:a$ a mixed et, a d s immad i -our Ge on I Quextieg, f uestig The CII4,Nogz.GOR •of the . 11 said, it was Certainly his wish td bring the q ues ,, ", 0 , to a conclustorr this night, but fiom the number w, were prepared to offer their sentiment's; and vvl7o the tiouse was anxious to hear, - he ‘vau l d c onsent adjourn the debate till this'ilay.—Adjuurnal a ss ,quarter past, two. MAILS. Alt R. c Dublin. Du:t_3_ jam b urc - ; 1 1 , Dublil l • z Waterford. • ~ . , --....„---- .. , PRLCE ot: sTocKS • . , 'llus DAY AT TwaLyit o'4s..oc l K, a 'Consoli - - . - -- - - . - ,: . * •. ' YT HE S U At'? SULEA rxr...su:q L 0 N D 0 K, • TtiESDAY, rrc%umtv 12, c lot A report is in cir cu l a ti on , chat tl'e 1 ` * -1 t he Squadron has been s een, full of 'rrno}" , I° , r southward of Cape Finiiterre, by a Spanidi :!eturi ill to Ferrol from SoOtli America but ni t l c credit i not. attache) to the report. to LLI3 11)5 again P ilt '- from Torbay. wit witAhnspi:::nrtetosolenplrai ic , "."."4""...e cuslion relative t 4 .Ea:llit 14,e54:11;;D. ge tob fawt was t ie Peers yesterday 3ebive Fe oHouse of in :t i ll I th s t mi to : 0. : : l esi e r. bt:ot j uutnc.4 to this day. On Thursday last, t all bydecided, o g f iv en in the Itish Court of - Exchegurr, 1 " r ''.; : ia the 7th inst. jtsclgrnh, ass Mr. Justice JoHNsosr. The adjocation ',jere. favour of the Crown ; but the question is not 1 `viii taken " Ut of Habeas Corpus in the Common Pleas. , tn 4 The as House t he Defendant to his Ben Benefit. d t . r4 ' Young • ii4pc;Nl had last night a Wil l° overflowing te r,i 3 O'' The Hertf r B cndshire Elediun commenced Y e ' 10 1 l ivi . AKER was proposed t:y Si rJoHN S" ij ,10 3 and Mr. IRAZID by Mr. HALL. At the coal° 0 of the Poll yesterday ay evening * t he * nurn bcrs acre follow ; Eto majority for Mr. IEAKsa. - :11717 tO l ---- a2r y se o ' f n n s if a h n t ho t l i l l e e :R j3 ig , r h t t . ITV' s . m Sir j g c s i tl; imA 0. 0: 7 It4 oZ, n / d E advocate. for Scotland, was nnanimouslY reyckiej. Member of Parliament "far the County .of re 4" f. 's . c f Last S ut 1 6 ,, i ' - - -n -ar the first of three. dil'itwns ;00 from 7 ' ! Inf a ntry, matched into Lewes, on ''' ,-, oil I Rye to Portsmouth, where the it'g lin'. ' IV s arrival, is, to embark for t he East Inch rh 111 ,t two other divisions were expeBed to tak e ' JP , quartets there - yesterday and to.day. ,., a ll', The Court of King's Bench yesterodU, ,' ri judgment r, against the Defendant, to t he e i ; o f IND: sentenced for' in e :Cti.olelnfllit formertiiig ; fraudsisix , n i f i t: o ir n ) f l i t ::: , r o s :: c r : i rlii il e, t ! t_.-fliAttri aRs v. Cm; i d F 1 / LE).—...EpcvA It On d I" w all tlt .. ctr, and to atand in the pillory opposite S''', o ot o House, On a c ertain da y the latter to Or ; I ff , st PoaTsmouTu, r EU. I 1.-...iirri ired we 0 4 ;,,,1 it liii 'Majesty's Ship viivitiewo, off , o to --- : 1 0 : ou tw a rd ci e : b S t : a : e u 'rif f rj ,:cil i y:i e :l 4 , as isr ti t a ia l , i & sn y f i'd r o o :: m u l: ::::::e ll : o l ;l l) s : ti ' lf n i'es i c r ;:4 :::::: i li f : . .. ArDaba,AiLsurFig:::ilgieliiTiv---S:iTleidgrgessis• GMrsii.ij c e s r t : v fi.: o l :, il t nd ,114°..'"ind ` Gun-brigs , fOr their stai" ..,uniognes . . , hI " w it .., Also sailed the Bonita sl o op c f W.iff - op?. xrilf-41,0/‘ and Charlton East India 5hi11! . i,„,`,.,1 Sl if ' vfoy Transport, anti all the 4.,001,,irdiv0-. chant Ships, under Convoy for i'ortsni,4"ll: 0 Ib ir A fire 'broke nut `a - few eveni i g: T i o cc s t° : t ili o lil ', • f i i m nary O. Sir j libt -II --ANSFIELD. 1 ‘ 14 ' $0 - 6 (pare, which unfortunately dosiroYe d I part of -: coo Folio Volugies• For Mr. BAK&X Mr. la A. ND - Mao LotliON rrinted R: f to 13Uyittotreoj, and. published by %V. A• Meittiu.street), a t the Suu.-01fice, tz,