The Sun. — London, England, 1805-04-09 00:00:00

seek security by going froM a place where alone security could be found. If the Bank at England 11.4.1 failed, no responsibility would have been incur. red by Lord Melville, because he •.w justified in placing the eublic money there ; but the moment he wen: even co the most respidtable private Bankers his reseonsibility commenced. Events might hap pen not possibly lobe anticipated, the money might . be lost, and . then Lord Melville and, Mr. Tiotter would be overwhelmed with destruCtion. Atter all, however, the money had not been lying at Couttes. It had been , employed in discounting private bilk, and in apeculating; in the funds (hear! bear/ I). The House would be appalled when they relPeted on the extent of the trust reposed by. Lord Melville in \ Mr. ,Trotter. In the course tut Mr 'Trotter's continuing in office, . Lord M e l. ville States that a hundred and thirty millions of the public money had passed through Its bands. ,It had been proved.that, of this sum, fifteen millions had at different times been placed at a banker's. That Lord Melville should have suffered this man to go on in such a manner was of itself enough on which to rest his accusation .(hear: hear). It was infamous that the pittance wrung from the necessities of the poor should he sported with in the hazardous game of atoele.jobbing. The Only defence that Lord Melville could have set up (if any thing that he could say on the subject deserved the name of a defence), was, that he had inquired into the accounts and proceed. ings of Mr. Trotter, and was satisfied with their regularity ; but no ! he knew nothing, he had examined into nothing. The Hon..-Gentleman exposed at considerable length the absurdity of 'l4r. Trotter's attempt to render his accounts at Court's complex and confused ; but at the conclusion he is sufficiently, methodical to feel warranted in telling the Public that they are no sufferers. He „confesses he has had at his disposal, five or seven hundred thousand pounds in the year, but he cannot distinguish the pub, lie from his private funds ! When the Commis sioners called on him to explain, he telused to utter a word. What ,then must be the . inference ? They then proceeded to investigate, and found that NIG Trotter had had money by draughts on. the, Batik of England. to the large.amount before stated, with which he hid purchased stock of various kinds, and a number of Navy Bills, at a time when the discounts were considerable. He never tirolesses bringing to , the account of the Public any of the profits gained by these speCulations. is not Lord IVleiville heavily responsible for all this ? „Ought he not to have said tp Mr. Trotter, tt, You arc not the person to embark in such speculations ps,tilese, even on your private fortune. Conneaed as you are with me, the PUblic will not believe but that' you avail yourself of superior information, by Which to regulate your movements in the- Funds t desist, therefore, or leave my service ;" for. a servant he certainly was, and as such, his master was com. pletely answerable for his behaviour, The sums w i t h w hi c h Mr. T r o t ter speculated in the Funds were enormous, even by his own bobk, which of course would not contain a tenth part of them, Mr. Mark Sprott, who, by the by, ought to have been conTelled to answer all the questions of the Com. so i al o o nera, purchased for him in one day above 300,6001. Another Broker transferred upwards of 35,0001. Was this fur the sake of security t Lord Melville acknowledges in his evidence titer he knew all this ; and yet when Mr. Trotter denied having made any use of the public money, he never came forward, as lie oug ht to . have done, and exposed` the falsehood Paym..atet—i falsehood, indeed, t': 3t might have remained undettatd to this day, but for the praise-worthy vigilance of the Commis. stoners of Naval If there was any who yet doubted that the 'I reasurer and the Paymaster shared in the spoil of the Public, he would proceed to ad. Vance still more convincing proofs of their collusion. io the firstplace, the large sums of money paid to the account of Mr. Dundas, and which it would be difficult to explain in any other manner, and then that certain complexion which seemed to pervade the whole of the speculation, They were all lucky : this was a most suspicious . circumstance, and indi. cattcl very strongly that an understanding existed between them, to which Mr: Trotter was ire: event y indebted for secret ititelligence. Not to mention again the private - agency 'of Mra .Trot. ter, or the destruttion of Lord Melville's papers, it must be recolletted, that in the course of a few' years upwa rds of a hundred and sixty thoOsand pounds had been paid into Coot lei, in ihe names of the Right Honourable Henry Putulas, 1-lenry Dundas, anti Mr. Dundee ; now, whether these were all one and the same person, did not seem very doubt ful. Allowing, therefore, that the whole amount di Lord salary for that space of time bad been paid into - Coutts's, it would have bottle but a small propor.ion to such a sum as a hundred , and sixty thousand pounds, Mr. ,Trotter was the most 'improper Verson , that Lord Melville could have seie4ed in the whole kingdom for his. Agent. What I make his , Paymaster his private Agent ! receive sums of. money Ittial that Agent in advance, and then tell the Commissioners that he really .did not know. whether %ASCII ' advance was from the public or from a private fund, Let us inquire a little into the histoiy of this Mr. Trotter. , When Lord Mel. ville first became Ticasurer of the Navy, he watt a Clerk in the Pay.trflice; he was a man of tn. Icrably good connexions, .but by nu means rich. Lotd Mcivlde makes him his Paymaster, and soon after (knowing his 'poverty) hurrtaWs considerable ems of money from him. Why, he must know that at WAS the public money from which these advances were made---(hear! hear!)--:-Mr. Trotter had no other money to lend. When Mr. Trotter is asked . whether or not lie ever derived any advantage from t h e use of the public money, he replies, " I wort't tell you." What was Mr. Tierney's answer to a • similar question ?- 4, No." Mr. Bathurst's Lord Harrowby's ?e-" No." Bur when it the same r e t ort churlish is came to Laid iVicl r tile , med, tell you. Mr. Wilson too wile equal:y tato!o:o ; but Ire ought to have been corn. relied t k. lie had no doubt been influenced t • ',relic:. icy the thi eats and promises of his au. 1;Y1 , 1 , . When Lord Melville gives his evidence t L o tol o,ooi,ooers, one should have thought he vv, , ul,t have cline by the de. of his 1-a:,era, fortified . d by a previ. sat I%ti~rn 044 knOWlCtip ,of the questions thus in all, rtu- bability would be put 'to him. But alien lie c requested to account for the deficiencies, .evith the cause Of which the Treasurer of the.Nevy ought certainly to he well. acquainted, he gives a long equivocal answer, and rekrs them to. Mr. , Trotter for inform'ation on the subject. But did Mr. Trotter afford this, information O, no!— When he came to . Lord, Melville's affairs,, he stopped short at , once and wisely held his tongue. Could there be a stronger proof than this of their partivination in guilt ? And yet Lord Melville pretends that it was only in June last that he became acquainted with the wai , ie which Mr. Trotter used the public money. Lord Melville was by no means remarkable for the weakness of his me runty, perhaps rather the reverse : but when asked, if he had derived advantage from the public money, he replies, " not to the best of my recolleftion." /t was somewhat strange, that hisrecolienion could not assist him better in an affair of such importance. As to the Salary of the 'Paymaster, it would be better to increase it to a thousand or two thou. aand 'molds, than to allow such unlimited depre. dations to be committed on the Public. Could it be supposed that the Legislature would remove from the Treasurer the temptation of hazarding the public money, and leave it at the mercy of his sub. alterns ? The Honourable Gentleman alluded to the case of Mr. Jellicoe, and contended that it was an a dditional proof of Lord Melville's 'sharing in the spoils of the Public, as he had forborne to press the payment of jOiir• je'llene'S balance, apple. hensiye, no doubt, of making him an enemy.—, These suspicions were much confirmed by Lord . Melville's last letter to the 'Commissioners, an extraordinary produnion, and produced at an extra. ordinary period,. four months after 'the delivery of his first statement, and on the eve of the present dis. cession. In the outset of ,this letter he thinks it neceasary,to re.state the grounds of het former an. ewers, with which the Cpmmissioners were suf. Wendy acquainted. He proceeds, and again complains of his want of recolleEtion. He then asserts, that he never " knowingly " de. rived any advantage from the public money, either directly or indirectly, through the medium of Mr. Trotter ; that is, he borrowed money from a man, who, When he first knew him, was worth nothing, and whose last dividepd exceeded eleven thousand,pounds, and yet . did not " know " that such loans must have come out of the public purse. The destruction of Lprd Melville's pri. vale. papers was a must suspicious circumstance, espe. cially when corroborated by that of Mr. Trot. ter's ledger, in which 'the accounts of all his em ployers and connexions must have shared the same fete ; but when to 'lleac were added ,the loss of Mr. Jellicoe's writings, it was impossible not to feel complete- conviefon. of Lord Melville's guilt, Having 'dwelt for some time on this topic, the Honourable Gentleman proceeded to comment on his Lordship's Letter, and contended, that it left him precisely in the same situation in which he • was placed by the Report. There were n.any points which he hid left untouched, from an apprehension of exhausting the patience of the House. If, by the trimmer in which he had concluded himself on this occasion, he had departed from that modera tion with which he proposed to , regulate himself, it was master of sincere ,regret ta t him. But he trusted the House would at in a manner con. eistent with its digpity in dispoaing of this ques tion. Not only, the charaner of Patliament, but, of .every individual Member of the House,. was con. cerned. It was due, to the Gauntry ~to prove, that no man in pewer, no person bigtvin office, ur placed in a situation of trust or responsibility, could with impunity violate the Lew, or prove, un. taithful to their duty. He had no wish, to wound the feelings of any Geptleman ;,but he was confident he should appeal for support to every Member in the House except those relatives of the Noble Lent who could not he expeted to vote for hi s repositions. kie could nut ..ceneeive it pos. allele ter any ()Oleo 'description of persons to op. pose them. The Country Gentlemen, ever dis. tinguiahed guardians of the public money, could not lend their assistance to shelter from the yen. geance , of the 'House any persons guilty of great malversation in the management of the public money. Neither would those Honnorable and dis. tinguished Officers of the hriby and Navy, who were Member's of that Howse, give any encourage. merit to transactions inconsistent with the noble len. 'intent of honour with which they were animated. They vvouli be the first to stigmatise a flagrant vio. letion of the law.. What would the Commercial Mem. bets of the House think of the transaction, if their confidential 'Agents should think proper to destroy their accounts ?, would they not regard it with hor. rur ; and - had not .Mr. Trotter speculated in the Stocks with the public money so as materially to in. jure trade P Would they be satisfied with this gross violation of law Would they be contented with_ such praftieet, merely because it was stated that no l oss h a d 'accrued to'. the Public? Would it have been a justification of Mr. /Weft, or of Any other person in the same unfortunate circumstances, to have said, Here is your money : you have sustained no loss through my malpractices ? Would they be satisfied, when calling for ievestigation of accounts to their Agenti, ,to be told that all vouchers had been de stroyed P, They certainly could nor; and lot had every right to presume that he should have the bee refit of their support. With equal confidence he could appeal to those Members of the Learned Pro. fession whose peculiar province it was to 'assist in the picsecutioni and trials of public offenders, and who every day' Witnessed the'exemplary pueislunent pf culprits fur offences far Ices criminal than those which formed the matter of his charge. Could the flight Honourable and Learned Gentleman opposite '(the MA . Stitit of the Rowe.), who presided so ably arid impartially in a Court of Equity. urge any thing with propriety in justification of a palpable and direct violation of law 'Ceuld the Right Honourable and Learned Gentleman opposite, (the ATTORNEY GENERAL), whose proviece it was more than of any ether, from the dotiereof his office, to bring offenders against the law to jeatice. rettentet to palliate e r r jthfily this illegal conduct P fee was CnniLlent he could not ; bet rather in the seitir of impartiality and uptightriesa, which . charatterised t he Admittistra tee! ot j es tice in this C s iuntry, and rait,eil out Civtl Jurispitelenee to such mime. , tion in Europe, would vote for bit 'propositiolito He called opon the House to recoiled, before they should come to the vote, the circumstances under which the offences he charged had been committed. He called upon them to contemplate the magnitude ut the Taxation with which the Country was bur. thened, in consequence of which the rich were obliged . tooetreoch their superfluities, and . the Coen. try was injurea, as the poor. thereby lost the em. p o t : 2; 11 7ot which they would have in providing It should be tecolleded, that they had came at last to tax the subsistence of the poor, after having exhausted all the other sources of Taxation. They were told that these severe burthens were necessary, and he did not deny that that might be so ; but they were peculiarly called on in such a case to shew, ,before they came to be colleft ed, that the Administration of the . Revenues of the , Country was purely and fairly condufted, and that there was still coolish of vigour and virtue in Parliament to make an example of 'public de. Unguents. The. Eon.. Member concluded with reading. his Resolutions, thirteen in numGer. The .first was merely a .repetitien of the ResolutiOri of the Committee of the whole House on the 18th of June, 173 z, approving of the condud of the Corn. missioneroaf Accounts, and adopting their sugges. tion respecting the ,grant of a permanent salary to the Pay.master of the Army and the Treasurer of the Navy, in lieu of all fees and perquisites ; the re maining Resolutions were founded on the loth Re. port, corresponding in substance with the charges opened in his speech ; the two last, which went to charge upon Lord Melville a participation with Mr. Trotter, the Hon. Member declared his in. tension not to press on the House that night. On the question bei ng put on the first Resolution, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could not Wit admit, that the Hitt. Member had, during the former,part of his speech, adhered striElly to the observance of that moderation and temper which he had promised at the outset. Towards the end, however, of his speech, he had departed altoge.' ther from the tone in which he had begun it ; and in the Address, with which he concluded, to the House, appeated to endeavour,' by an appeal, to the passions on topics not appliCable to the subjed in discussion ) to excite an undue imoressien favourable to his'pro. position. The lion. Member had adverted to the, hurthens which the exigencies. of affairs had rendered necessary, and appeared to insinuate broadly, ,that the trans:talon, whiCh was the objed of his MOtion, had been the means not only of augmenting those burthens, hut a considerable aggravation of them. It was important to have this matter 'investigated, as, if the fad were so that the public burthens had been aggravated to any extent by . the miecundu# or rualversation of any perso.n or persons in office,•there was no man, in the House would deny that such.praatces were a fit objet of accusation in that House. But that ap. peal. to the feelings of Gentlemen, and with refer ence to irrelevant topics, was by no means calcu lated to promote a just and impartial decision on the merits of the . case, according to any ,principle of 'equity or fairness. Whatever opi nion might be entertained tespeaing any part of Idle materials contained in the 'Report, it.was dent that it did not cootain, a single allegation of any ridichiet liaving arisen to the. Public, or of any loss haiing been adually sustained---(A loud iymul• hover) of " Hear hear from the Opposition.) This indecent attempt to prevent the ,freedom of speech by clamour was little suited to the dignity and solemnity of their proceedings, and he looked upon it as no good omen that the moderation professed by the lion. Member in the discussion had been departed from, if those Gentlemen who approved, of his 'arguments should interrupt those who' might undertake to reply. to them. He was, one that would' nut be interrupted by clamour; and he would repeat it, that such an appeal to the passions was little consistent with the professions of temper and moderation with which the Honourable Mem ber had set out. This would be the more evi. .dent, 'when it was recolleded also With what in. duster similar Misrepresentations had been pro. pagated „without doors, and on subje . tts the most dangerous and inflammatory, for the purpOse of rail.' ing a prejudice in the public mind. It had been re presented abroad, 'though not charged to the same extent by the Hon. Member, that the pay of the Seamen had been delayed in the Navy Pay Office. .(A try of No, No, from theOpposition.)So far from such a circumstance having taken place, he had the satisfadion to state, that that gallant and ruerito tins ,class of men had not suffered the * delay of a single day in the discharge of any of their demand.. But he had not only to complain of the lian.Gentle. man having deserted his moderation in the latter part of his speech, bet also of the manner in which he. had represented the transaction and stated his charge. The Hon. Member load told; the House that the Noble Lord, and the others implicated in his charge, bad had an Opportunity of being tried, and informed their, also of the manner in which this trial was condtined. ,Qudstibits had been put to them, and they might have answer. id, They undoubtedly had the opportunity of answering to such and such questions ; but what ever might be the eharader of such en in. terrogation, it , was not a trial. What trial was there in which the party accused was not made acquainted, with the change against him, had not an opportunity, of hearing the evidence to the charge, and of cross-examining :that evidence ; as also of adducing evidence in .his favour ? But in a trial a man was not .bound to cri. inmate himself, and, in -this case that was the 'only feature, whilst every other charader of a trial was absent. The partici had no knowledge of the charge aga i ns t them,, could nut confront nor cross-examine the witnesses, nor w are allowed to call evidence in their defence, but were examined to crimin at e themselves by their ev idence. He stated, this only toe the purpose of having an opportimity of adding, that it WWi illlr)SSlsie for the -111 , nse to accede' to the Honourable Metri:)er'' s piop o . sitions, • beciuse the: materials bcfol , :! thein were not officient to enable them to c in:.! to a fair, lalp4filiti, and final decision on the tra•firt, tit the case. He admitted that the enntenol nl Eiie R,- t Were of a grave' 0(4 o.7rious natter , a rld t h at irrioortant to have. fully ii,ve,lt g 1,-1 ; and he w as ready also to allow that the actua,. 1;:t, had been in. catered by the Public, tltoUgh nn mischief had heel produced ; with reference to any instance of itregnia. rity, it was the great duty of the House to set !kir m•ttk upon the transaction, after a full and fair consi deration of all the cilcuotstances of the cave. BO that ( 'l3 the case of the preset , ' Report, he contende3 there were not sufficient msteeilts, n pr in su ch 3 Otape as .to justify. thell use in a vote of Censure( om r to enable the to determine h ow far it ms) l 4 necessary to follow it bes-with furilo.r proceeding:. He contended,. therefore, from the documents on the Table, that further explanation tvnuld he fleas -3;ly proceed. they should before the Houle c'iild be justified in expressi"i any opinion on the tnerits, Or to state Ow lengti)r opinion before he came to . the House, the arii uvele of the Honourable Dll-mber, I ended not on ihe Port, but •on .a statement of numbers ehic 14 had found in the Appendix, on coeutstions 13.:, from much intricate and &Ricoh accounts, wool° have excited it in him. Fie had also observed, 04 If he had sue evtertmiled ti,at the Hon. Gentleman had gradually cha,geti ihe grounds of his charge, which he had mowe d I t 'esti° an intention to take the sense of 'he F l ' u : s i ort one particular point. The Finn." 11,1cmhe 4 ' ft divided his charge at fi rs t into tl rec. heads, btl" c , he then reduced to two, and Jt present he el r I"” to cosine himself to one of them, resereitgilli4e;* cund for future elimination - and in urgi..l, 1 "', I . charge the Hon. Member had stated, Ow oil:itt it formed but one of the several heads o f elorget i t Was impossible for the House to form a i' 4l g snrn. fich es upon it without considerieg the whole case. ,t at the conclusion of his speech left out itit,ge"lice the suspicion which he had so won I ic ii ' I g y to , ei u ble Alen ) preceding parts, of the particip. • ti " 4 li .;. I ._ • Lord in the profits that had aectsied from t"7 O , cation of the public money to private serdlid„'l;ls ith rard to this suspicion, if the 'Li ihe Gentleman thought that it WAS borilt; O M hc o a Report, he ought not to have brought ir i l " f ro st• with a view to giving a complexion til till ' e• a d ti ters of charge; but be made a , separate g r la o ot critninatinn. It was impossible that it Ow' trig 3 be revolting to the feeling' o f every person coolood. with the Noble Lnrd, either by blood or b) Tr i m with al ship, to have such a charge brought Ag.itn't,3,l,oo such a • Way. For Otis own part, he was '" e ' s t o that the House should 'look at the whole ° „el vase, in all its circumstances an& h e ' r"' Cit ' 1 then do, without delay, whatever die i"'' r. ol the Public, a just sense of their .own th-,' , / . ' i i,i, the nature of. the case may require. I' ' 1 0 ,1.c .PurPnges he thought the best course tu 1 0 ,,e1 would he to refer the Report to a Select Co.otie,',,,c inasmuch as there were m any poi!'" contarec,;lo, which required further explaratio• ' b N ool mittee might be appointed previous to th e w , 0 1 so as to proceed in the business withQ ur ` I ,„' t isik g to be able, a short time a fter the hn•lideq"' niiiiil their Report to the House, upon which difY ilog to I. i come to a decision on the whole case, Jce"i',..,a„si the rlidates of iin • ' ' lice and ' s cl(r . her partial.jus 1 Me''' regard to their duty. The lionutAb'e A . p lic'' had dwelt with much ea ' on the -I ' . l a • (fleetness o f e t. . *ton of certain sums for the accommotylatio . o on jo los branches - "t thc, public se rvice i but , f itst• ill P view -of the question, the House was not pit i t he (inn to. decide upon that traneadi'n':,ogitie uf Hon. Gentleman mean to say, that i t s J i ' e " l „tot ts this transaaion, the House was tv , c "3 tai: ciollll# consideration the excuse'', them' live :: 41" ? ‘ : l4 stances, and tha necessity of the tt.'"-,4;31' lite site the House, knowing only the hare 1 " " tie , of ° application of the money in such 2 Was ps 10 111 : violation of the law, to cleci.!e ur fi bei bet '' e without taking into consideration ' 4. me se: loss had arisen from it---whether the att' L Ale. ti ts ' O'll'' 1 0" iqStifiable, wanton, or necessary ; t a l p P I t o circutnstances were such as to oarr4cl4i w At 1 1 , cure from the letter of the law, raid %, 1 13 s' t ,g, magnitude of the transac tion?' i t v ie) , of 1 0 ( necessary for him tct argue the Int.l.4didoit"'; R , milting such a latiiude will' riq ' 0 1 i'' l' a With persJoa o f liberal • :ma .enliehie_r'otio sg,', for he was con fi dent that all such wilerobe‘",:t with him, that cases might o ccur ' iit 1 1 14 cuthstances under which such :‘ 1 " / . 4, „‘ t is 0... f, take 1 • p aLe Wtill t make i. I 1 .. meritorty Aot,, ei puov 11,0 Public Officer to incur the he avY r tre=ss Oil % This he stated, With a view 1 0 th ct s . t . r u l,r to'l l) t e ° o been laid on the application of a P2111,1‘ it ! I da o i l different service from that for Whicilteoooo6o, 'fated. There was an allegition in tit' atet i j .e.i r j ) nead, and the Hon. Gentlctson Kad in S t h i, wol") i , , kr sum aal , ~ ccti i 1 i 1 having been au vein ,„ . A /iv ra 00 r n en. , , ) 0 afterward ' i repeated by his Han. . risA tto . 0 He haahituself be. that t r 4 110 4 / 4 CIS a par ty to the a le he ehould be.- ashamed to siddre° oott en 4 the subject if . he could not eitnlain,riledie Willelflie'i'l asrelafed to the share he had bo 0 ~, ~,vef 1 ~e, their entire satisfaction ; so chlorite ' ''• te o sl i Ur' . • the 4PPlieatiOn might have he_ ri sta b It dflo nod he was ready to take that fli f g rA il i u ns etitv appear ta. have a risen from con red loin tie ie interest, and to have been tranerettnly far l' IP vice for which it had been vote' l . r , cd or Icili;clor and, without either any incenveotele (0 li d; placed afterwards. It WAS illIP": 5 0 i t)CC(I Prfle,oll' OM CirCUlTlitanCiS under which it ' l. pull ih t ~,it' but if the House would consent to sioroiriorg 1.:, mittee,he should prodUce the was `concerect , 4. 1 : rnents, so far, at least, " h s ed t'' I.; ":' ' '' whole sum particularized ernoun of 4,0,00 g;,;;.", out of which two different aut"' Set it Le',l hall been drawn' with his Pti v ``.. s' f i s o the f , u!'',.. pot stances which he could fully .tester l i • ,00 '', ek I F and as these sums made the muolig.'every r OP r II N I whole sum speci fi ed, there wag ' lita i n- o . i ? . ha d ' „„. think that the whole had hee° , a .04 ' INT hie L ar s' 10, ; 1# equally justifiable. The --°;„ t ion't d P,I t il j time, Other high official 3 " -$ 1 1 ° ) aO O • I ‘..ui f a. have had oecastoo, and Alf s , ' .! ca ds i on or ; as e vity, have 'applied SUM oto Cil . A rt'pH ferent service friars that la ,flie 1 "11 the l'''' itr f pir beet) voted, with a view t ' p u l l fic ,031'" 't a t l e and though he was clot in p"s i , ot e ,: i) J , stances', he had no &OM" 11" ( he oar' e D",,,, . t' ir ti. 1 0 i ' t pjUla SittibfilaOrily aCCOI.I'" 10,10 b. jr -1 i of the "or ' As .to the oth:r pit, -1 iv i e tel 14'., ii item toil C hat g e. . t 11/ t l'°f" 1 4 ' VI ( 1, ! t ,'' Ot t he LItY . 1 l' no/e at t!:c e.tytTl .s'te r '-, yi.l Or 1 p°i , t''' ~i 1 , ;-•4 ittt+tiq 1" ,e' I,o ' , i , 4 . ~,. .11 riq io .., tic c on' , s ip i pqrpthes tai ors , Ate ,profil. epti-' " 1 c ' • lof 4° Joo:ar:,1 to ilia} J. ie.. ...,,V. • ~ a .~«~* T I I. y~,. '~, q~'e~~ 4 . ? 4 , mss ". ma-