The Sun. — London, England, 1846-12-02 00:00:00

3. .11. -.0 wk.. LATEST PRICES OF SHARES, I N BANKS, ASSURANCE, AND OTHER GOM PANIES' STOCK. From tie Official List, PUBLISHED EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVE.NING. LONDON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1. JOINT-STOcx zusiess. I Dividend I Amount Name of Company. : per of Paid. Price Annum. Share. ------ ----•••-• ...--..• £ s. d. l Z s. d. Australasia .......... 161. per cent. ,40 0 0 40 0 0 - Britsh3lorth American j 51. per cent. 150 0 0 50 0 0 - Commercial of London 151. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 - Colonial. • - Londn and Westminstr , 61. per cent. 1100 0 0 20 0 0 - London Joint-Stock .•• ! 61. per cent. 150 0 0 10 0 0 - Metropolitan . - 125 0 0 710 0 Provincial of Ireland- 181. per cent. 100 0 0, 25 0 0 - Ditto, New. , .........Si. per cent. 10 0 0! 10 0 0 - • - National of Ireland - 1 51. per cent. 50 0 0! 20 0 0 - Nat. Provincial of Eng. , 51. per cent. 1100 0 0 1 3.5 0 0 i - Ditto, New. •••• • • • 51. per cent.l 20 0 0 1 10 0 0 Union of Australia.. •• , 61. per cent! 25 0 01 25 0 0 I - , Union of London. •••• 1 51. per cent.; 50 0 01 10 0 0 .- INSURANCE COMPANIES. Dividend Amount Name of Company. Per of I Paid. Prier. • Annum. Share - .1 £ s. d. ! X s. 0. AThion ............., 3/. 101 500 0 0 50 0 0 75 Alliance Erit. and For. 6 per cent. 100 0 0; I I 0 0 18% Ditto Marine ... . 61. per cent, 100 0 0 5 0 0 514 Atlas ....... .... ..... 13s. 6d. pr sh. 50 0 0 5 0 0 15 IA British Commercial .. 7s.per share 50 0 0 . 5 0 0 7% ClerieLMed.&Gen.Life 5/. per cent. 100 0 0 ! 210 0 10 County .... -•••. •• • • 31. 100 0 0 10 0 0 Crown --•...•• •• . • 10s. 50 0 0 ! 5 0 0 - Eagle ...... •• • • 63. 50 9 0 1 5 0 0 s%xd Eng.& Scot. Law •• .. 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 ! 2 0 0 3 European Life ••• • -5% per cent. 20 0 0 All paid. 20 Freemasons' .• •••• • • • 5/. per cent. 20 0 0 , 3 0 0 Globe ............. •. 6/. per cent. Stock. 1 - 135 Guardian .... •••• • • .• 5/. per cent. 100 0 0.36 10 0 47% Imperial Fire ........ 6/. and bonus 500 0 0 150 0 0 230 Imperial Life •••• • • • • 12s. 100 0 01 10 0 0 - Indemnity Marine •• • • I/. sh. & be. 100 0 0 ; 5 1:1 1 31 Law Life . 1/. as. 100 0 0 i 10 0 0 , - Legal and General Life - 50 0 0 1 2 0 0 04 London Fire •• ••• • • • 10s. 25 0 0 ' 12 10 0 15 London Ship •.••• • • • 10s. 25 0 0 12 10 0 1514 Marine.. ........... 51. per cent. 100 0 0 15 0 0 - Vied. Invlid& Gen. Life 4%1. per et. 50 0 0 2 0 0 - National Lean Fund• • 51. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 - National Life • 'Collodium Life ...... Phoenix • - - 205 Protector Life.... ... 5/. per cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 - Provident Life --- .. it. ss. 100 0 0 10 0 0 23 R)ck Lifc• •••••• • • . • . 4s. 500 i 0 10 0 4% Riyal Exchange .5/. per cent. Stock. I - - Sim Fire ........... - - 210 Ditto Life . • .. • ... • - - 49 11.iiversal Life • - .• LIST or SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PRICES. Dividend Amount Name or Company. per of Paid. : Price. Annum. Share. -- - £ s. d. £ s. d Ttaillc. of Scotland - 100 0 0 I : 175 Royal Bank of Scotland 67. per cent. -- 100 0 159 British Linen Company 81. par cent. I - 100 00 . 220 Commercial Bank .. • • 61. per cent. - 100 0 0 ~ 162% National Bank 6/. per cent. f - 10 0 0 114/.140 Union Bank of Scotland 7%/. pr cent. i - 50 0 0 1 91 Western Bank ••• • • - 50 001 85 North of Scotland Bank 161. per cent. - 5 0 0 1 7% Clydesdale Bank. •• • - 61. per cent. 1 - 10 0 0 43'. 8s Eastern Bank •••• •• . • 5/. per cent. ! - 10 o o 1 itq Caledonian Bank - • - 210 0 ' 11. II s Edinb.& Glasgow Bank 6/. per cert.. - 5 0 0 i 71. Is City of Glasgow Bank . 51. per cent. I - 10 0 0 ' 13/. fee Scottish Union Ins. Co. 51. per cent. 2O 0 0 1 0 0 253. Od Hercules Insurance Co. 71. per cent. 1 100 0 0 10 0 0 14% Incur. Co. of Scethid- Si. per cent. 10 0 0 All paid. ; 10 North British Insur.- 5% 1. pr cent. 200 0 0 10 0 0 i 271.; Caledonian Fire Insur. 101. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 1 22!t Edinburgh Life Insur. 161. per cant. 100 0 0 12 10 0 1 IS 14 Edin. &Glasg. Railway 1/.100. pert. ;50 0 0 50 0 0 1 75 %4 Ditto, li Sbares• •• • 7s. 6d. p. s. 'l2 10 0 All paid. 1 18 Edin., Leith, & Grantn - .20 0 0 20 0 0 18% Glasgw & Ayrshir /tail. 71. per cent. j5O 0 0 All paid. 69N Clasgw&Greenek Rail. 2/. per cent. !25 0 0 .511 paid. I 16% f.liegw& Garnkirk Rail. 5/. per cent. '25 0 0 All paid. I 39 Dundee& Arbroth Rail. 6!. per cent. :25 0 0 All paid. 37 Standard LifeAssernce.l U. per cent. 50 0 0 I 210 0 I 9 CANALS. ,; .I' Dividend Names of i 2 Dividend Names of cie Companies. , t'l per Price. Companies. 2 A a nntun. Price. i 7: 1 Annum. :c -----t- Ashtn&Ohlh' 57 5/.55. p e 70 Morunouthshi 100 8/. I - Ashby-d-la-Z113! 4/. 70 Mntgomrysh 1100 51. - Barnsley.. • • ;160 121. 180 Macclesfield ~ 1 00 - Basingstoke..loo - ' - Neath ••• • • • 100 17/. 340 Brknk&Abrg,lso! 51. 85 Nottingham . 150 12/. - Cromford -• . ,100 141. : - Peak Forest.) 78 31. 40 Dudley ;100 4/. - Regent's -.• 33 11. ss. 20 Derby ..• • • ;100; 6/. 73 Rochdale ..• . 85 41. - Ellsmre&Chsl33' 4/. 55 Shropshire ..,120 81. i - Erewash ;100 321. j - Somrset Coal Ico 71.105. 130 Forth & Clyot 100 41. - Do.Lk Fd St' 12 61. p. c. I - GrandJunc4 100 71. 83 Stffrd &Wore:l4o 28/. 270 Grand Unionloo' IL 10s. - Shrewsbury.; .125 15/. - Glamorgnsh. 172 13%1. - IStourbridge..'l4s 201. 315 tlistr&Brkly ; 'OO - - IStrtfrdon Av 79 11. 105. ' - Grantham .• ,' 1501 121. - !Severn and I , 96 1/ Se. 9 Huddersfield.' 57' - - 1 Wy e Rail. - 3 "I Kennt & Avn , 39 7s. 6d. 51i Trnt & Mr-1 5 Lancaster 47 . 10s. Leeds&Livrp' 100 341.! U 5 - 20 /T s h e a Y n ' l l s 4 & B .l ll le i di i 19 0 - M. -- Leicester .•• • 140, 10/. 105 rorestr &""/ ' ~, , 7 Leicstr &Nth' 83 41. , 52 Binning j *" "I - 43 Loughborogh,ll2, 701. 850 jWllts& Bi:ksi 67 11. I 11 MOCKS. ividnd Name of Company. D per e Annum. Amount Share. Paid. Price. X s. d. X s. Commercial •••••• . • • 31. per cent. Stock. East and West India... 61. pr cent. Stock. East Country T mdon •• •• •• St. Katharine •••• • • • • 5 per cent. Stock. Southampton •••• •• 11. per cent. 50 0 0 WATEIC-ixroRXS. Name of Company. Dividend Amount per I of Annum. Stare. 0 0 Paid 14134 Price, X s. d. East London.... •• • • Si. 100 0 0 Grand Junction •• •• •• 3/. 10s. 41 13 4 Kent—. ••• • • • 2/. 10s. 100 0 0 Vauxhall •• • ••••• •• . • 57. per cent. 100 0 0 West Middlese . . . 51.5 x. pr cut. 63 12 9 LLOYD'S SHIPPING. LONDON ' DEC. I.—Wind this d a y a t noon S . W., f res h breeze, and hazy, with frosts RAMSGATE, Nov. 30.—Wind N.W. to N.E.—Arrd. Devon shire, Godfrey, Batavia ; Amelia, Cuetto, Brazils. DEAL, Nov. 30.—Wind N.W. to N.E., squally.—Arrd. from the River and sld. Elizabeth, Curven, Algoa Bay ; Wil liam, Cape of Good Hope; Ellen, Taylor, Bahia. Down, Nov. 30.—Wind N. to N.N.W.—Off, Fanny Anny, leaky, with bows stove, from contact with a schooner, off Beachy Head. LIVERPOOL, Nov. 30.—Wind N.N.E., light.—Arrd. Cicero, late Graham, Savanilla; Margaret, Laguna. Sld. Henry Gardner, Kemp, New Orleans; May, Cuthbertson, Africa; Woodbine, Skeotch, New Orleans. MUMBLES, Nov. 28.—A boat, marked " Arab, of Bide ford," was picked up, 24th inst., near the Skye Sands. LIMERICK, Nov. 28.—The barque Triumph, and the brig Jane were in contact in the Pool this morning, and both re ceived damage. NZWPORT, Nov. 30.—Wind N.E., strong.—Sld. Amy. Robsart, Nixon, Hong-Kong ; Lady Douglas, Retson, Fer nando Po ; Anna Christina, Matson, St. Thomas. CAERNARVON—Arrd. Royal William, Francis, Quebec. Dumax, Nov. Wanderer, Jenkins, Trinidad. WATIRFORD.—Sid. Reindeer. Trindall, Rio Janeiro. OFF Exmotrru, Nov. 2 9.—Madagascar, Speight, Cal cutta for London. FAL - NtouTa, Nov. 30. —Wind N.E., strong.—Arrd. Pearl, Burrows, Maulmain, and Mauritius. GUERNSEY,NOV.27.—SId. Laura, Le Memrier, Havannab. PLYMOUTH, Nov. 30.—Wind N.E.—Arrd. Rothschild, Cornforth, Moulmein; Don, Muir, Quebec; Gentoo, Lake man, ditto; Viola, Wilkinson, ditto; Venture, Tollerton, ditto; Mahler, Beckett, ditto. DUNDALK, Nov. 27.—Arrd. Fowler, Brotlinell, St. John's, New Brunswick ; Dundalk, ditto ; Pelican. Sanders, ditto. HULL, Nov. 30.—Wind N., sharp frost, with heavy snow. —Sid. Ceylon, Crisp, St. John's, New Brunswick. The Sofran,Calson, from Gefle to this port, was driven on shore near North Somercoates, yesterday morning, and is likely to become a wreck. Crew saved. Cargo discharging. A sloop, in ballast, went on shore on the 28th inst., crew saved. A fire broke out yesterday morning on board the Caledonia. Good, from Bombay, but it was subdued towards evening after considerable damage to cargo. Sotrrnworm, Nov. 28.—The Falcon, Robinson, from Shields, has arrived here with damage, having struck the Pier last night. Pra - peourtr, Nov. 29.—The Enterprise, Davis, from Glou cester to this port with salt, got on shore on the breakwater and filled.- 30th.—Th e F r i en d s hi p, Evans, from Gloucester, ran on the breakw a t er y ester d ay, has been floated off; cargo ' all washed out. BRISTOL, Nov. 30.—Wind N.E., fresb.—Arrd. Governor Douglas, Hyde, Quebec. Skl. Adelaide Dovell, Tobago ; Sir H. Pottinger, Crowell, St. J o h n ' s, N ew Brunswick. MARRIAGE OF CAPTAIN DALRYMPLE, M.P. On Friday last, a meeting was held in the Town-hall, Stran raer, to devise measures for making a public demonstra- tion in honour of the marriage of Captain Dalrymple to the daughter of the Duke de Coigny, which is expected to take place 02 the 9th proximo. Sir John M'Taggart, M.P., was in the chair. The meeting unanimously re solved that measures should be taken far the purpose of making a public demonstration, and a large and influen tial committee of the inhabitants of the town, and of the tenantry of the Rhins, was chosen for the purpose of carrying out the resolutions. At a meeting of the com mittee, held on Tuesday last, it was resolved that , on the day of the marriage, there should be public dinners in Stranraer, Glenluce, and Kirkcolm, and a grand ball in the evening, to be held in the spacious apartments of the Stranraer Academy, where efficient arranges enti are in progress for the accommodation of the very large com pany that is expected to attend.—Dun fries Herd 41. DEATH OF SIR G. MACPHERSON GRANT, BART. —On the 24th ult. this honourable baronet died at Bal lindalloch Castle, in the county of Elgin. He was born Feb. 25, 1781, and married, August 26, 1803, Mary, eldest daughter of Thomas Carnegy, Esq., of Craigo, rorfarshire, and has issue three sons and three daugters, the eldest, John (born 3d August , 1804), succeed s t o the titl e an d estates. Sir George represented the county of Sutherland in Parliament for 17 years, from 1809. In 1806 he inherited, as heir of provision to his father's maternal uncle, General James Grant, the estate of Bal lindalloch,. assumed r t , he surname of Grant. He was creat e d naarnodet in 18..8. The present baronet mar of man ia g September , Nutter 836, Marion Helen, eldest daughter shire, and has a numer ous El" of Ballimore, Argyll secretary of l egation a T L f.ami y. He was sometimes Invereshie are chiefs of tribe which for ages has been distinguished by the adregose'fignation of " Slio , h Gil considerable fami lies," and which is composed Gil lies, not only of the name of Mamcpallyrson, but of others, as the Gillieses, Gillispies. &c. MANUFACTURERS OF PERTH. —We unders tand the gala trade is very brisk here a t p resent, and the worsted tartans generally. The m anu f actur i ng houses , hardly supply the demand for th e E ng li s h markets cean ; ad Perth tweeds and galas hav e now got a name in the South. Several houses, formei ly exclusively in the cot ton trade, are now largely engaged in the mixed woollen and cotton goods ; and we have little doubt that in a short time the latter will divide the staple trade of the place with umbrella cloths. , —Perthshire Corer.' THE SUN, LONDON, WEEIN.ESDAY MORNING, DECEMBER 1546. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Dee. 1. The Lord Chancellor sat in the old hall, Lincoln's Inn, to-day, it being the first seal after Michaelmas Term. His Lordship took appeal motions and appeals, but nothing calling for a particular report came before his Lordship during the morning. VICE-CHANCERY COURT, Dec. 1. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR Of ENGLtND.) This being the first seal after Michaelmas Term, His Honour the Vice-Chancellor of England sat in his court In Lincoln's Inn to-day. NEATE v. PINK.-lUDGMENT. His Hortoun gave judgment to-day in this case, which came before him during last term at Westminster, upon petition praying that a reference might be directed to the Master with respect to certain funds in court, the produce of estates in Jamaica. His Honour directed a reference to the Master to inquire and state to the Court whether any and what sum of money had been paid into court in the cause by William Horsley Palmer, the receiver, and whether it had been paid in respect of the profits and proceeds of the moiety of the Bindley Halt estate ; and his Honour further ordered that, until the Master should have made hi 3 report, no money standing in the cause should be paid out without notice to the petitioner. The Master was also to state special circumstances, and any party to have liberty to apply. May. Saw Mr. May forcibly turn her from the house. Cross-examined—His mother kept a tavern in Shef fiFld Recollects Mrs May going on one occasion to Manchester, but not to Cheltenham. She went to the plaintiff's, who is a bookseller and printer in Bristol, before she ultimately left her husband. She went to these places during the time she was living with her husband. Had heard that she was a servant of all work to a Mr. Turner before she was married, but he believed this was untrue, and that she was a governess in Mr. Turner's family. He did not know whether she was mulled or not. No person of the name of Levick was in the habit of meeting Mrs. May at his mother's tavern. Re-examined—Mrs. May went to Manchester because the defendant had ill-used her. Mary Ann Wright, who had been a servant in the plaintiff's family, deposed to the residence of Mrs. May and the condition in which she lived. _ _ _ Mr. Aird, the plaintiff's solicitor, detailed the various transactions which took place in the matter. Mrs. May came to Mr. Jefferies at Bristol in April 1843, and stated that he would not be responsible for her maintenance in she continued from home. - - - This was the plaintiff's case. Mr. MARTIN then proceeded to address the jury of behalf of the defendant. Ho said great stress had been laid on the value of the defendant's property, and that he was in a fit condition to allow his wife, who was es tranged from him, 255. a week, but the very contrary was the fact ; his whole property was not more than 1301. a year, out of which he had not only himself but his family to support. Mr. CROWDER said this was not correct. He could prove by Mr. Aird that the defendant's property was annually worth 278/. 10s. Mr. Aird was called, and stated that he had made inquiries at Sheffield, and stated that the property was of nearly that value. Mr. Martin and Mr. Compton appeared for the de fendant. Mr. Martin proceeded—He said Mrs. May, who Ira S a handsome woman, was not a governess at the time she was married to Mr. May, but lived on intimate terms, and in a menial situation to a friend of his. In the first year of their marriage, when the children were very young, some words ensued at dinner one day, and she left the house, obtained 501. from Mr. May's banker and absconded. She returned in 1836, and he allowed her to remain. The children had grown up, and he took another house for them, and from 1836 to the time of their final separation the children lived in one dwelling and the defendant and his wife in the other, She was in the habit of going at night to her sisters against her husband's will, and returning late at night. On one occasion her husband returned home and found her absent and the bed unmade by her orders. As it was not made by the time he usually went to bed, and as she had not eome home, he slept in the house his children occupied. The next morning she took part of the fur niture and left him. Mr. Justice ERLE considered that Mr. Martin ought not to advert to circumstances anterior to the time Mrs. May first left her husband. If a man and woman sepa rated, and then again lived with each other, " by-pones should be by-genes," as it was evident they must have come to an understanding. Mr. MARTIN was content not to trace the history of the parties further than the occasion when Mrs. May last left her husband. He admitted that he could not adduce proof of the alleged adultery of Mrs. May, and therefore he threw that part of the case overboard en tirely. He said he should call a number of witnesses be fore them, to show that no undue violence was used by the defendant, who was a quiet, inoffensive man towards his wife ; that she was not justified in leaving him, and that she now remained absent from him against his wish, and concluded by trusting that they would return a ver dict for the defendant. He then called the following wit s,es Mr. King, an attorney of Bristol, proved that he, Mr. May, and Mr. Unwin, went to the house of the plaintiff, on the 18th of April, 1843 ; that he demanded his wife ; that the plaintiff denied she was there ; that Mr. May offered to pay him up to that time all that was due, and he told him if he kept his wife after that, he would do so at his peril, adding " Why do you bring actions against me for the maintenance of my wife, when you know I want her to come back to me ?" The _plaintiff declined to tell him where his wife was, and refused the tender of the money offered. Pointed out the advertise ment respecting Mrs. May in a Bristol paper. Mr. Unwin corroborated the last witness's evidence. Mr. May was about 68 years of age; Mrs. May was 15 years yoanger. The property of the plaintiff had been mortgaged. Should say he was worth about 120/. a year. Never heard any allegation of cruelty until this action was brought. Eliza Jones, one of the defendant's daughters, deposed that Mrs. May left her father soon after their marriage, and returned in 1836; on her return she and her father lived in a separate house from the children. Never saw her father at her feet or strike Mrs. May, and never saw her with black eyes, though she was in the habit of seeing her every day, Recollects the altercation referred to. She went into the house with her brother in consequence of hearing Mrs. May cry out " Murder," a cry she fre quently used without being struck or ill-used by her father. her hair was hanging about her neck and face. Her brother asked her father what he had been doing, to which he replied, " I declare to God I did not strike her." She ran out of the room screaming " Murder." Did not make use of the expression about the " pie meat" imputed to her. Mrs. May often visited her sister, and came home at ten, eleven, and twelve o'clock at night, and when her father asked her whero she had been, she used to say, " That is my business—where I have a mind." She left of her own consent, no violence being used towards her. Harriett May, another daughter of the defendant, cor rollorated the principal part of her evidence, with this addition—that she had heard Mrs. May call " Murder" three times ; on each occasion her father was absent, and no one gave her any provocation. James. May corroborated the evidence of his sisters, and said the business which his father transferred to him was worth 1,5001. Other witnesses having testified that they never saw any violence on the part of DEr. May towards his wife, and having spoken to acts of violence and passion on her part, - Mr. CROWDER replied. Mr. Justice FILE then summed up, and explained the law to the jury. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, damages 78/. 155., the jury being of opinion that Mrs. May had been treated with personal cruelty, and that she had no reasonable ground to justify her in supposing that she would have met with better treatment from the defendant had she returned to his house. The Court was occupied up to half-past six o'clock, when the jury returned their verdict. BAIL COURT, Dec. 1. ZLANDERS V. SIR H. BUNBURY. This was a special case, the alieCiOf • which was to ascertain whether certain lands in Suffolk were tithe able under the provisions of the Tithe Commutatien Act. The arguments were not concluded when the Court rose. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Dec. 1. CUSTOMS FRAUDS -THE DIAMOND TRADE-THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. ALLEN. This was an information filed by the Attorney-Gene ral against the defendant, for having in his possession a large quantity of diamond rings and other articles of jewelltery, alleged to be of foreign manufacture, and upon which the duty had not been paid. The defendant carried on business as a pawnbroker in Clare -street, Clare-market, and the goods in question were seized by the Custom-house officers upon two se parate occasions, in consequence of information given to them by a female servant residing in the house of the defendant. The Attorney-General, Mr. Watson, and Mr. Pearson app aced on the part of the Crown ; Mr. Montagu Chambers and Mr. Wordsworth for the defendant. On the part of the Crown witnesses were called to prove the seizure of the goods from the house of the de fendant. Several jewellers were also called, who gave it as their opinion that the articles were of a foreign fabric, and got up for the purpose of "rigging" the trade. At the conclusion of the case on the part of the Crown, Mr. M. CHAMBERS addressed the jury on behalf of the defendant, and proceeded to call, Mr. Hickman, working jeweller, of Rawstorn-street, Clerkenwell, who proved that he had himself made the articles in question. Several persons employed by him also gave evidence of the articles having been made upon the premises of Mr. Hickman. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that after the positive evidence which had been given on the part of the defendant, he should consider it his duty not to proceed any further in the case. He considered, however, that there were sufficient grounds for the seizure of the articles, and requested the Lord Chief Baron to certify to that effect. MS LORDSHIP took the same view of the question, and the jury accordingly returned a verdict for the defendant. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 1. WAREHAM V. PRANCE, NASH, AND OTHERS.-THE GREAT WESTERN ROBBERIES. This was an action of trespass, brought by Thomas Wareham against Mr. Vaughan Prance, Mr. Nash, and Arr. Collard, who had been connected with conducting the prosecutions of Alaynard, Garratt, and others last year, for the robb er i es comm i tte d on t h e G reat W estern Railway, to recover damages for an alleged false impri sonment. Mr. Sergeant Wilkins and Mr. Foster appeared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Sergeant Talfourd, Mr. Sergeant Murphy, Mr. Sergeant Channel, and Mr. Hoggins were for the defendants. Mr. Sergeant Muctss having gone over the particu lars which he intended to prove in evidence, proceeded o call his witnesses. George Gardner Dun, a waiter at the public-house in . Foley-street where Thomas Wareham lodged, deposed that on the 20th of August, last year, three persons, answering to the description of the defendants, came to the house, and took Mr. and Mrs. Wareham in a cab. Hannah O'Connell evidenced to the same apprehension on the day in question. Mr. Seymour Clarke, superintendent of the Great Western Company at the Paddington station, said ho remembered the plaintiff, Thomas Wareham, calling at the station about the Ist of August last year. Maynard was then in custody in reference to the property lost on the railway. When he called he said he was ac quainted with Garrett, and that he could give some in formation about him. Witness sent him with a messenger to the solicitor of the company. A man called Chilman was sent with the plaintiff to Mr. Nash. Nash was then clerk to Messrs. Maples and Co. Cross-examined by Sergeant TALFounD—He could not state precisely the day referred to, but it was soon after Maynard was taken into custody. He could not state how long after. Mr. Nash had the charge of the railway department of Messrs. Maples and Co. There bad, previous to this time, been many depredations com mitted on the Great Western Railway. Mr. Vaughan Prance had: complained of the loss of his property. When that gentleman first lost his writing case the in quiry came to witness, and he communicated the fact to the solicitor of the company. Cross-examined by Mr. Sergeant MURPHY—Ware ham did not say he was mixed up with Maynard. He only said he bad some information respecting Garrett and Maynard in connexion with these robberies. He did not say he lived in Maynard's house, or that he was in timate with that party or Garrett. Davy, an officer of the police at the Pad dington station, was here called to prove the fact of the plaintiff on the day of his apprehension being taken to the station, and kept all right, but on being called three times in Court, he did not appear. Mr. Sergeant TALroutry wished to explain that he understood the witness was ill, and could not attend. He wished this to be known, that it might not be sup posed the company had anything whatever to do with his absence. This was the case for the plaintiff. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD addressed the jury on the behalf of Mr. Prance and Mr. Collard. His defence, as far as Prance was concerned, was, that on the day May nard was taken up, he was at Nether Stoney, in Somer setshire, and could not have been one of the three in the public-house. He was prepared to prove that, and also to prove that the one of the three, supposed to be him, was another person. Mr. Prance had nothing whatever to do with the conducting of the prosecution against Maynard awl Garrett, out of which the apprehension of Wareham had arisen. Those prosecutions were con ducted on behalf of the Great Western Company. The only position in which Mr. Prance stood in the matter, was the fact that he had lost property worth 2,0001, and that he originally entered into negotiations with May nard to recover his writing desk, which ended in the apprehension of the latter, and the matter being taken up by the Great Western Company. After that he had nothing whatever to do with the proceedings. With reference to the general defence of the two defen dants for which he appeared, the Learned Gentleman called the attention of the jury to the robberies perpe trated by Maynard and Garrett. It had been clearly proved that Garratt was the principal thief; that May nard, though ostensibly a house agent, was extensively engaged in these felonious transactions, and had been convicted for the same. When this was known, and they found Wareham living in the same house with Maynard, mixed up with his transactions, and actually offering to give information respecting the felonious pro ceedings of Garrett and Maynard, did it not furnish a strong presumption that the plaintiff was also connected with them. This view of the question was further sup ported by the fact of Wareham endeavouring to act fur Maynard in several suspicious particulars. The Learned gentleman recapitulated the principal facts of the whole proceedings taken preliminary to the apprehension of Maynard and Garrett. He considered id would have been wiser to have taken the plaintiff and his wife at once before a magistrate, so as to be relieved from all responsibility on account of the apprehension; still, under the circumstances, there a ere strong reasons for justifying the course taken by the defendants. If dameges were at all to be given he submitted they should not be more than a farthing. Mr. Sergeant Munpisy addressed the jury on behalf of Mr. Nash. He admitted that his client was present at the public-house at the apprehension of the plantiff, but contended that he did no more than was absolutely necessary for him to do in the case of a person suspected of felony, which was to keep him in safe custody till the following mornirg, when he would be taken before the magistrate, and when the charges against him would be fully investigated. Witnesses were then called for the defence. Three witnesses severally deposed that on the day on which the apprehension took place, the defendant Prance was 150 miles distant. George E. Evans, oire ---- ofihe turnkeys of the Giltspur street Uoripter, gave evidence of interviews that had taken place there between the prisoner Maynard and the plaintiff, accompanied by a person whu gave his name as Smith. Wm. Springet, another turnkey, gave evidence to the same effect, and deposed that on the 7th of August Wareham came with a person who called himself Smith, but who turned out afterwards to be Garratt. On that occasion certain proceedings took place at the interview which led witness to suppose that they were connected together, and that they gave addresses which subse quently turned cut false. Thomas Tricker was examined by Mr. Ser geant TALFOURD as to the circumstances under which Wareham and Maynard lived together in Hoyland-street. On some occasions Wareham ap peared as landlord, and on others Maynard. On most occasions, however, when he called at the house, Mr. Wareham appeared as the managing party. Wit ness recollected Maynard being taken up, and saw Ware ham two days after. He then told witness that " May nard was taken up, poor fellow, and that he did not know whether he was guilty or not ; but that if he was, there were many others also." He lkewise told witness about the writing-desk left in the house by Maynard, which he stated to contain a great deal of property. May nard bad told plaintiff to take care of it if anything happened to him, and that when the officers were in the house the plaintiff and Garratt took it away and left it at a public-house. The desk was stated to contain many duplicates and valuable docu ments. He promised witness, who was acting for the proprietor of the house, that he would deliver up what documents he had any claim to, if he gave him some money for them. Witness subsequently was shown a large handful of duplicates, which plaintiff said he bad taken from the desk, and which he offered for sale. lie had some conversation with Wareham the day after he had been taken to the Great Wetern station. Mrs. Wareham was present. He said "he did not care a - about it. He had had plenty to eat and drink, and a half-crown when ho loft, and that was more than he would have earned at home." _ Examined by Mr. Sergeant MURPHY, for Mr. Nash— On one occasion, when speaking to Wareham about the papers in the desk, plaintiff said the property in it was of great value, and that if the officers got hold of the documents it would play the greatest mischief with him. Cross-examined—The property of Dr. Rogers, to whom the house belonged, was furniture, and china and glass ; there were also some duplicates belonging to the doctor. He had told the story he had stated that day over and over again to Mr. Nash. He had been with that gentleman four or five times. Arthur Spencer said lie was a dealer in marine stores in Paddington. Had known Maynard for two years prior to his conviction. Did not know Wareham till he went to live in Hoyland-street. Maynard had lived in Hoyland•street about four months before his apprehen sion. On several occasions when witness called there he saw Wareham. On one occasion he met with Wareham at the King and Queen public house, and the latter then stated Maynard was only a lodger, and that the house was his. He had some conversation with Ware ham after Maynard was taken up, and he stated the facts about the writing-deik, and said there was the deuce to pay at home. After Maynard had been examined at the Guildhall witness was told by plaintiff that he had received a letter from Maynard, wishing him to act as his agent and look after his wife and fancily. Wareham said he would not do anything without money, and that he would not give up the writing case without a sum was paid him. The witness gave the details of other inter views with the plaintiff which went to show that he was intimately mixed up with the proceedings of Maynard and Garratt. The cross-examination did not materially affect the evidence in chief. Joseph Halfpenny, landlord of the Bell public-house, in Tichfield street, deposed generally to conversations with Wareham about Maynard's affairs, of a similar nature to those referred to by the previous witness. He also gave evidence that Garratt, on one occas i on, left a leather portmant e a u i n his custody till he or Wareham called for it, and that about three weeks after the plaintiff called and took it away. , . John Davy, an appraiser in Union-street, gave evi dence to the same eff ec t a b out conversations with Ware ham. On one occasion the plaintiff mentioned the writing-case, and said Collard and Nash were in search of it, but that he would take very good care of it. Henry Avery, clerk of the Central Criminal Court, produced the convictions of Garrett and Maynard. Mr. Serjeant WILKINS submitted that these convic tions were irrelevant, as they only proved the conviction of Maynard and Garrett, and could not be taken as proof of the felony as applied to the case of a third party. Mr. Sergeant TALFOURD contended they were not irrelevant, and should be taken as evidence of the felony committed. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE referred to the case of the Irish Society, on behalf of which he appeared before the House of Lords. On that occasion a similar point was raised, and it was decided that such could not be re ceived as evidence against another party. The con victions, therefore, might be received as proof of the fact of the decision of the Court, and for any collateral purpose arising out of that, but not as evidence of the fact that felony was committed by the parties in question. Mr. Vandyke Lawrence, deputy• governor of Millbank prison, deposed to Garratt being delivered to him, and to taking him with 199 others to Woolwich. Henry Masterman proved receiving Daniel Garratt on the Bth of December, and placing him on board a convict ship then bound for Bermuda. Mr. Evens, a clerk in the criminal department of the Home-office, put in a return from Bermuda, stating the arrival of Daniel Garrett there. The Clerk of the Court here read a rule which had been obtained, empowering the Master of the Court, or commissioners, if that were not practicable, to examine Garratt, since his conviction, in relation to the whole proceedings. The examination of Garratt was next read in extenso, which embraced the whole proceedings relating to the stealing of the writing-case. The substance of it went to show that Maynard and Wareham had acted to gether in the transaction about • the writing-case. In other respects it corroborated the evidence of the wit nesses examined on this point today—that Wareham was privy in a great measure to the nature of the pro perty, and that it had been feloniously obtained. The case was then adjourned till to-morrow COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Dec. 1. (Before M r . C omm i ss i oner F ONDLA NQUE.) CLOSING THE CO URT -- IN RE RAy—TTIE TORBIY RAILWAY COMPANY. This was a case of i nso l vency . Th e insolvent bad been a director of the Torbay Railway Company, and to-day was appointed for the examination of the secretary and others connected with the company, and the production of books, &c. on behalf of Mr. Whitmore, the official assignee, to investigate the liability of the insolvent as such director. _ _ It appeared, that the railway 7 ..13 formed in 1838, but subsequently, the money raised not being sufficient for the proposed scheme), some of the directors allotted other shares, and the question now was how far the insolvent, or his estate, was bound by the acts of the other directors. It was alleged that insolvent was not present at the meetings, and that, in fact. no such meetings took place as those entered in the minute books. Mr. JAMES took an objection, in limine, to the exa mination of the company's officers or books in this case. The acts of the directors were the acts of the company, and Mr. Wray was one of the directors ; indeed the proposition was "suicidal," for if Mr. Wray, through Mr. Whitmore, the official assignee, succeeded in provi,g that the allotment of the shares was fraudulent, he made his own estate liable, for it had been held in a recent case, that if any allotment was mane in fraud, the di rectors were liable. It had been urged that the proceedings had been Toided througa the non-attendance of some of the directors, otherwise the whole object of the Act might be thwarted by the deliberate non-attendance of some of the parties. He had to contend that the act of some of the directors sitting as a board was binding on all. Mr. COOKE denied that the insolvent had ever sanc tioned the allotment. The Learned COMMISSIONER said, if a co-director, co partner, or co-trustee assented to proceedings, diri;ctly or indirectly, he must be bound; but if there had been any fraud committed, he w:is not, and in equity was entitled to an inquiry. It was now at issue whether there had or had not been fraud, al d he was of opinion the examination should go on. As it was to take rlaco in the Court, every one was at liberty to take notes as far as they went, and in any way they wished, but it must be understood no publication of the examination should take p!aee until after the proceedings had concluded, or he would close the doors, whi-h he had the power of doing in that Court. This discussion arose on the question whether the notes should be taken as evidence if perjury was im puted. The examination was proceeding, but, under the cir cumstances, cannot of course be given. POLICE INTELLIGENCE, MANSION-HOUSE. Thomas Johnson, porter to Messrs. Chaplin and Horne, carriers, was brought before the Lord Mayor, charged with having stolen a truss of silk of considerable value. Mr. Riches, manaeing clerk to Messrs. Chaplin and Home at the South-Western Railway Terminus, stated that the prisoner had been engaged by him in the middle of June as a delivering porter for the town, and that on the 24th of November it was the duty of the prisoner to deliver parcels which came by the railway in different parts of London. There were 36 parcels altogether to be delivered by him on that day to various consignees, and amongst them was a truss addressed to Machin and Sons, Twisters-alley, Bunhill-row. On his return to the station he said he had met with a bad job and lost a truss. Witness said he did not understand such a story, and desired hi'n to send the boy in a ho had accompanied him. Finding that the prisoner di I not go quickly, thd witness went out and saw the prisoner talking to the boy. The witness, upon questioning both, found a great discrepancy in their statements, and suspecting the pri soner, looked to the delivery book, and found that the missing truss was a truss of silk worth 125/. Further inquiry confirmed the suspicion, and the prisoner was given into custody. Joseph Webb, porter, residing at No. 7, Little Lent street, Borough, stated that on the 24th instant, as he was going up Blackfriars-road, he saw three parties whom he knew to be bad characters, and he followed them to Smithfield and into St. John-street. After he had watched them for some considerable time, he observed one of them go through a lane leading into Charter-hot:se-square. Upcn getting into the square he saw a green cart with a brown horse in it, and in that cart were three persons, and the cart was draw n up to the waggon which the prisoner drove, and witness saw the prisoner put a small bale into the cart. It was some where about five o'clock, and nearly dark, and the three parties in the cart drove off. Witness came down into Smithfield, and the driver of the cart whistled to his horse, and it went off at a handsome pace. Inspector Wocdruffe requested that the Lord Mayor would remand the case till Tuesday week. The prisoner said he did not know at all how or where the robbery took place, and that ho was equally ignorant of the contents of the truss. Remanded till Tuesday week. Charles Cotton was charged with having robbed James Finnis of a watch. It appeared that the prosecutor went into a clothes exchange for the purpose of making a purchase, at twelve o'clock in the day. The prisoner suddenly whipped the watch out of the prosecutor's waistcoat pocket and ran, but handed the watch to an accomplice as he went along, and it was lost sight of. Barney Aaron, who has ascended from the character of a fighting man into that of a constable, stopped the thief with skill and effect, although threatened by some ruf fians in the neighbourhood for interfering.—Committed for trial. John Johnson, a man employed on the Ipswich Rail road, was brought before the Lord Mayor, charged with having robbed a fellow labourer, in whose house he lodged, of clothes and money. Inspector Todhunter stated that the prosecutor charged the prisoner and his own wife, at the station house with having robbed him and absconded from his house, and the charge, which it was clear could be estab lished against Johnson, was entered against that person. The wife, however, who was willing to appear before the magistrate was, as a matter of course, discharged. The prosecutor said he was surprised upon returning home one day from work to find that his wife and the two youngest children had de parted by the Orwell st , am vessel for London. As no time was to be lost he took to the railroad, and arrived to catch the party, with the addition of the prisoner, who had evidently taken his place in his wife's affection. He did not exactly know what money his wife was possessed of when she eloped, but he was in the habit of supplying her with money weekly, and when he apprehended her she had not a farthing about her. The prisoner had between seven and nine pounds about him. The LORD MAYOR —How long did the prisoner live in the house with you ? The prosecutor—Upwards of two years,and we always worked together. But lam ready to give her all if she'll come back with me. The wife of the prosecutor declared that she merely came to London to see her sister, and the prisoner ac companied her as her husband's presence was necessary at home to support her two elder children, and keep things straight and comfortable in her absence. The prisoner never induced her to come away to London, and her husband's clothes were merely borrowed for a time. The LORD Maroa—Then you are willing to go back with your husband ? The prosecutor's wife—Certainly I am. I never intended to stay away from him. The LORD MAYOR—What could have led you to such an act ? The prosecutor's wife—My sister is married to a miller somewhere in London, and I wanted to have a little conversation with her. The prosecutor—'Tis true, your Lordship, she has a sister here who is married to a miller. But I'll think nothing of what has taken place if she'll only come back. I'll forgive both of 'em. The Loan MAYOR—Then you don't wish to prosecute the man any further ? The prosecutor—No, I won't hurt either of them at all. The prisoner —I didn't take any things of his, I wily took care of them for his wife, and I'm sure we're as in. nocent as the two children she has with her. The LORD MAYOR (to the prosecutor)—Well, as you seem to think that no harm has been done, I don't wish to disturb your tranquillity. As for you (to the pri soner), if the charge had been pressed against you, the probability is that under such circumstances, transporta tion would be the penalty you would have paid tor your baseness. The injured but forgiving husband then took his clothes and his wife andchildren, and a sovereign, which it appeared his wife had handed to the prisoner, upon d their departure ; and Johnson, to whom the woman said all the rest of the money belonged, pocketed the rest, and the whole party walked off to settle the affair more com pletely in a public-house. It was stated by a gentleman who had experierein railroad tnatters, that the ancient British system o com munity of wives was fast reappearing with therailroad system, and that such scenes as the above described were frequent upon the c various LEß lines. K ENWE LL. George Wilmot, alias Smith, was brought up on Mrs. re mand, charged with having attempted to murder Susanna Haines, wife of Mr. James Haines, when glacier, Islington, of Paradise-row, Liverpool-road, w the Court was crowded to excess. Mrs. Haines was brought to the Court in a cabriolet, in a very weakly condition. Mr. Haines, surgeon, who was called upon to attend her after the murderous attack, now attended and said, that she was not yet in a fit state to give her evidence, and it might lead to a dangerous result if she attended at the sessions to give evidence. The prisoner stood at the bar, pale and dejected. He said nothing, and he was remanded until the 1 4 th of De cember. He was taken to prison, and Mrs. Haines was conveyed to her residence. MARLBOROUGH-STREET. Sarah Brook, and her two sons, Alfred and Samuel, who were remanded last week on a charge of robbing Mr. Deare, a tailor, 1, Leicester-square (the boy Alfred's master), were brought up to-day for re-examination. Several pawnbrokers attended and produced articles which were identified by the prosecutor. None of the pawnbrokers could identify the prisoners except Mr. Syers, Drury-lane, who identified the boy Samuel Brook as having pledged a piece of satin with him. Mr. Loma said there was no case against the mother or the prisoner Samuel Brook. He therefore discharged them, and remanded Alfred Brook till this day week. WORSHIP-STREET. George Galloway, a youth, about 17 years of age, an apprentice to a Mr. Wells, was charged with refusing to work, lac. Mr. Herbert Wells, ivory turne r , N o . 8, Britannia terrace, deposed that the defendant, who was apprenticed to him abaut two years since, had out of that time ab sented himself for the space of five months, and on one occasion witness was obliged to bring him to this Court for his bad conduct, and he was sent to the treadmill for a month. Latterly, when any work had been given to him, he merely laughed and jeered at witness, and said that witness and the magistrate had done what they could with him, but he cared neither for magistrate nor master ; and rather than work, he would spend the whole of his time in prison. It would be a charity if the nrigistrate would cancel his indentures. Mr. BINGIUM—Yes, to you it would b 2 a charity no doubt, but not to the rate-payers. You are under a bond to keep him. However, I'll take -- Here the defendant's courage entire!) , forsook him, and he blubbered out, " I will, indeed I will, do the best I can in future. Mr. BrwmAm—Very well; I will give you are chance have given perfect satisfaction to your master, I'll try if I can't bring you to a proper sense of your duty. RUSSELL V. SMITH.-JUDGMENT. His Hosourt also gave judgment in this case, which was heard during the last term, upon a motion on the part of the defendant to dissolve an injunction which had been granted some time ago, restraining the defend ant from singing certain songs, which formed part of the musical entertainments of Mr. Henry Russel►, the celebrated vocalist, and in which Mr. Russell claimed an exclusive property under the Copps right Act and the Act with respect to Dramatic Performances. The Court, upon a previous application to dissolve the injunction, had directed the plaintiff to bring action with respect to certain of the songs, and had dissolved the injunction with respect to others. The plaintiff had brought no action with respect to several of the songs, among which were "The Ship on Fire" and "The Sea King's Burial," Szc.; to the others the record had been so shaped as not to be calculated to try the question which the Court was anxious to have tried. Under these circumstances, looking at the course that had been pur sued by the plaintiff, his Honour thought that the con tumacy he had displayed in not complying with the order of the Court, must be followed up by dissolving the injunction with costs. The Court then proceeded to hear motions, none of which possessed any point of interest except to the par ties concerned. (Before Sir J. WIGRAM.) KNIGHT 2'. KNIGHT. His tloNoun delivered judgment this case to-day. This w.,s an administration snit, and there were two questions at issue between the parties. The first, as to whether a gift claimed under a will had not been liqui dated by another gift subseqeently made under a mar riage settlement, and whether a portion of the answer of the defendant was net impertinent. It appeared that the testator, George Knight, who was senior partner in a business in Foster-lane, had left to his daughter, by a will bearing date July, 1840, an annuity of 1001. per annum in case of her mother's death, or of her (the devisee's) marriage. This latter event took place during the lifetime of the testator, and a sum to the amount of 3,333/. in Consols was settled in trust for her use, to afford the in come of 100/. ayear. It appeared further, that early in 1845 the testator died, and an assignment between the devisee and her husband of theirtestarnentary rights under the will took place shortly afterwards. A paper in the handwriting of the testator had been found in his cash box after his de mise, but without a signature or date, and this document purported to be his will. A devise of 1001. a year to his daughter was specified in this will, and it was contended in her behalf that the intention of the testator, as evinced by this document, was to give her an additional income of 1001. per annum, which she set forth in her answer, but the M-!ster did not consider this paper peitinent, and therefore would not allow its insertion. Ile (Sir J. Wigram) having read bath bill and answer, considered that the better way would be to decide in favour of the exceptions pro forma, though he felt satisfied that the Master was partly right and partly in error in his deci sion. lie considered it better also to defer the further consideration of the case, together with the costs, till after the hearing of the entire case. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Dec. 1. LIABILITY TO MAINTAIN A WIFE.-JEFFEREYS V. MAY. This was au action to recover 781. for necessaries sup plied by the plaintiff to the defendant's wife, namely, board, clothing, and lodging, for a considerable period. The defendant, who is a retired tradesman at Sheffield, denied his liability on the ground that his wife had left him without his consent, and that she had committed adultery, and consequently forfeited all legal claim upon him. They were married in 1826, but bad had no children. Mrs. May was a governess before she was married. Mr. May had been previously married, the issue of which was three children. For some time be fore the end of 1842 they had lived unhappily together, they frequently quarrelled, and on these occasions Mr. May often struck his wife. On one occasion he turned her out of doors. In conseyience of repeated ill-treat ment on his part she left him in September, 1842, and took up her abode with the plaintiff, who is a relation, at Bristol, and who, up to the present time, had sup plied her with nee( scaries. The venue was laid in iiristol, but had been removed into Middlesex in order to obtain a speedy trial. The case had been tried before, but the verdict was not satisfactory to the plaintiff. Mr. CROWDER, QC. (with whom were Mr. Butt, Q.C,, and two other Learned Gentlemen), having stated these facts, proceeded to deal with the defence s.et up by the defendant, and with the law on the subject. No doubt it would be set up on the other side that the de fendant had inserted an advertisement in some of the newspapers, cautioning persons not to give credit to his wife, as she had left him without his consent ; but this would not avail, as it had been expressly laid down that if a wife was compelled to leave her husband on account of ill treatment, and against his will, that such an act on her part did not remove his liability to furnish her with necessaries. In the case of Harris v. Morris, which was similar to the ono before the Court, Lord Kenyon held that where a man sent his wife away from him, and could not prove anything against her which would remove his liability, he was liable to furnish her with the necessaries of life. In that case the wife was turned out of doors, and the defence set up was, that she had eloped, and that her husband had advertised her in the newspapers, and cautioned the public not to trust her. If Mr. May really desired his wifz, to live with him, and she had left him without his consent, the proper mode to do so was to sue in the Consistorial Court for a resti tution of conjugal rights, when the whole matter would be investigated. In the case of Emery v. Emery, it was held that if a husband required his wife to return to him and she refused to do so on account of the ill-treatment she had experienced, that the husband did not get rid of his liability. lle should show that the conduct of Mr. May to his wife compelled her to leave him ; that he had been bound over to keep the peace towards her ; that after she had left him on account of his personal violence, she offered to return, and went to his house for that purpose, but he pushed her out of doors. Unless adultery could be shown, and that she was not ill treated, and had no ground for leaving her husband, he apprehended that the pl a i n tiff was c l ear l y ent i t l e d to a verdict for such a sum as they thought she was justly entitled to for keeping Mrs. May in clothes, board, and lodging. The d e f en d an t was i n good circumstances, and was well able to support his wife ; 255. per week was spoken of on one occasion, and the plaintiff charged at that rate. Mrs. Mary Wrang, wife of Mr. Wrang, a draper, of Sheffield, examined by Mr. BUTT—She deposed that she knew Mr. and Mrs. May, in consequence of residing in the next house to them in Pond-street, Sheffield. Heard her one day in January, 1842, cry for help from the parlour. Saw her two or three hours after at the kitchen door, when she observed that her face was swollen, and that one of her eyes was very black. Some time after she heard Mrs.. May cry "Murder," and call her by name for assistance. Went to the kitchen and found Mr. and Mrs. May quarrelling. Mrs. May was crying; her cap was torn, and her hair hung down her back. Heard Eliza Jones, Mr. May's daughter, who was present, say, " Many a man would hare cut you up into pie meat before this for less than you have done." Mr. .Tames May, his son, in coming across the yard of the house, said, " Don't murder the woman." She did not interfere. They did not live long in the house after that. Sometime after the occurrence in the kitchen Mrs. May cam', into her house, about eight o'clock at night. She was composed, and said Mr. May had turned her out, and asked permission to stop until Mr. May became less cruel. She remained until ten o'clock, when she left. The next night she heard a disturbance, and found that Mrs. May had brought a policeman, in th e h ope that hi s i ntervent i on might obtain admission for her to . her husband's o ho b r e ( e t . thSaht e n ( i l g i 11 1 t n . o t She e o wm might h h e t h h e o r w s e h v e e r s , n c h c a e v e e d e o d b t i a n i n h e e d r admission, as a short time after she loft the house and never returned. Cross-examined by Mr. MARTIN —Did not know the name of the policeman, or whether he was in attendance. Mrs. May did not break any windows on the night in question. She left in September, 1842. She had a ser vant part of the time, but she could no t reco l lect her name. Did got think she was in the habit of going out at nights, nor that her sister, Mrs. Wortley, kept a public house in Sheffield. Ite-examined—Had known Mrs. May for nine years, and never knew anything against her character. Mr. John Arnold, of Sheffield, deposed that in Sep tember, 184 9 , the defendant and his wife lived at home, and that some talk took place in his presence with re spect to Mr. May allowing her some maintenance. Mrs. May said, " Thou knows that it is no use putting thy name to this paper, as thee does not intend to stick to it." He said she might either consent to it or not, as he should not live with her any more, and she consented. She upbraided him with cruelty, and with turning her out of doors almost in a state of nudity. lie accused her of leaving him, and of going to places against his consent. Tho agreement was to allow her 201. a year, and he paid two instalments to him (witness) which he handed to Mrs. May. Mr. May was a man of considerable pro perty; he had been in the button trade; he lived re spectably, and like a man of property. By Mr. MARTIN—Knew that he was a man of pro perty from himself. He believed he did not keep a servant, and that his daughter did the household work whilst they lodged with him for about a year. They appeared to live comfortably. He saw no ill-treat ment, and no thi ng am i ss. When the recrimination al of luded t toteovoikeu. o place, j he aid heard nothear Mr. h May t e mention name a n a m m r e . Porter. - Mr. Bingham corroborated- the conversation with re spect to the agreement. Mr. John Wortley, Mrs. May's nephew, deposed to re ceiving his aunt with a black eye and a contused face, and her saying that the injuries had been caused by Mr. I 43 ii WESTMINSTER. Wm. Smyth, 191 V, was charged with the following gross misconduct : Mr. Anthony Maggs, of 28, Yeoman's-row, Brompton, stated that at about half past twelve on Saturday, he was walking along Grove-place, Brompton, when he was suddenly accosted by defendant, who said, " What have you got about you?" Complainant was surprised at the inquiry, and asked what he meant, upon which the defendant said, " I know you very well; you're one of the swell mob." Complainant inquired how he dared to make such an accusatittn against him, and gave him his name and address, and also that of his father in the same neighbourhood, in order that defendant might satisfy himself of his respectability, at the same time furnishing him with a pencil that he might put the address down. As it we: , in the middle of the day, and in a greni thoroughfare, a crowd of persons soon collected, com plainant felt very much hurt at the eonduct of d f.-nrlatu. and requested him to satisfy hung If inqunies some of those around them who know itim, whether was not the person he represented him elf to he. D fondant ; however, did not ay....1 himself itf this oppor tunity of setting himself rieht, hut upon the entratt - f the complainant accompanied him to the re=idonce of h s father. at 7. Lloyd's-place. Defendant was introdneed to complainant's parents, when he said, in reply to in quiries put b 7 them, that a gentleman in a gig. " whom he did not know," had pointed complainant out as a member of the swell mob. Complainant's father recom mended him to accompany the constable, and relieve himself at the station of the aspersion upon his character, and he accordingly went with defendant to Ebury-street, Pimlico, where Sergeant Forster, the acting inspector, said there was nothing to justify complainant's detention. and discharged him. Complainant was determined not to let the matter drop in this way, and as the station in Ebury-street belonged to the B division he requested to know where he could find tha superior officers of the V division, in order that they might be at once ac quainted with defendant's misconduct, and Sergeant Forster immediately sent a man with him to the nearest station of the V's, whore, for the first time, the defendant said that the charge against the com plainant was for taking a purse from a lady. The de fendant further observed, at the V station, that Colonel Rowan was the person who gave the complainant into his charge. The defendant was then asked whether he knew Colonel Rowan, and said he did not, but de scribed his appearance. Defendant - -LI told him at his father's house that he was not in my custody, and he went to the station of his own accord. Complainant—He told me about ten minutes after I left my father's house, as we were going down Sloane. street, that I might go ; but I WEI 3 determined to go to the station in vindication of myself'. After some further proceedings, Defendant, in answer to the charge, said that a-gentle man in a gig pointed Mr. Maggs out to him as a member of the swell mob, and the gentleman stated himself to be Colonel Rowan. Mr. BURRELL observed that the case was clearly made out againA defendant, who had conducted himself in a most unreasonable way. In his opinion, the story about Colonel Rowan was a mere fiction, defendant having, from some inexplicable motive, taken the complainant into custody. lie should fine defendant 31., and, in default, commit him fora month. THAMES. Edward Lock, alias Laughtdn, alias Locklee, a man about 30 years of age, described in the police- sheet as a theatrical hosier, was charged with breaking out of the dweliing-house of Messrs. Martin and Co., linendrapi-rs, %Vhitechapcl-road, and stealing money and securities to the amount of 310/. Mr. Pelham stated the case for the prosecution. On Friday night last Mr. Thomas Martin, one of the proscutors, &posited gold to the amount of 351. in his cash- box, below which he placed securities and I 0 U's to the amount of 2251. more. The box was placed, as usual, for security in a desk in the counting-house, a small room in the shawl department, at the rear of the rxemise;. On the following morning, at six o'clocic, Mr. Martin's attention was directed to the state of his shop and the fastenings. Tho street door was open, the box of the lock was off, and two bolts had been drawn back. There were two locks on the shop door, and both had been removed. On further search he ascertained that the cashier's desk in the shop had been forced open, and the slide of the drawer or till torced away. The counting-house door was not made fast on Friday night, because the lock was out of repair. The desk appeared to be all right at the first glance, but some chips on the floor caused Mr. Martin to institute a more rigid examination and he soon discovered that the bottom of the desk had been cut away, and the cash-box and its contents removed through the aperture, without disturbing the lid of the desk at all. There was a pane of glass taken out of the window at the back of the counting house, where the thief had entered from a lobby, and, after removing the bottom of the desk and stealing the cash box, he found no difficulty in retreating by the door into the shop, in an opposite direction, and left the premises by the street-door. A ball of wax was inserted between the door and the door-sill,which caused it to stick fast after it was slammed to on the exit of the burglar. The police constable of the beat pushed against the door several times during the night, while going his rounds, and it appeared to be fastened in the customary way. The suspicions against the prisoner were founded upon cir cumstantial evidence. _ _ _ After some further evidence, the prisoner said he was not in Printing-house-square on Friday night, but this assertion was regatived by Mr. Tipper, who said the prisoner did not sleep at home on Friday night. On searching the boxes of the prisoner the police-constables found three files and a knife. They also found in his sister's room a mask and a hammer. A piece of the wood cut from the desk was produced, and the indenta tions upon it corresponded with the size of the hammer head. None of the cash, bills, &c., bad been traced. The solicitor requested a remand for a week. His re quest was acceded to, and the prisoner was remanded till Monday next. Charles Woolmore was charged with committing a murderous assault on two police-constables, named John Earl, 13 0, and Hugh M'Kallan, 47 K. . _ After hearing evidence, Mr. BRODERIP sentenced the prisoner to one month's imprisonment for each assault, the last sentence to com mence at the expiration of the first. MARKET NEWS-( YESTERDAY. COLONIAL. Suoan.—The market for British Plantation continues heavy, 250 hhds having been sold at rather lower prices. The public sales have only offered 402 bags Bengal, which found buyers at 49s 6d to 563 6d for strong chrystalised N ellow, being mostly is lower. The quantity of British Plantation landed last week at the East and West India Docks was 343 hhds 2 tierces 9 barrels, and there were taken for home consumption 1,083 hhds 104 tierces 293 barrels. The stock in the same place is 6,650 hhds 788 tierces 2,040 barrels. CoFrul .-3,944 bags Ceylon were nearly all sold (except ing about 500 bags common good ord. native, which was taken in at 375), chiefly at 52s to 66s 6d for fine fine ord to mid coloury British Plantation kind, which are about pre vious rates. Rum.—The quantity landed last week at the East and West India Docks was 140 puns 8 hhds; there were taken far home consumption 245 puns 47 hhds, and exported 227 puns 16 hhds. The stock in the same places is 11,762 pulls 1,271 hhds. RICE.-931 bags East India was about half sold at 18s 6d to 14e 6•1 for low yellowish Madras, Bengal grain ; yellow and mid white Bengal were taken in at 15s 6d to 16s, being previous quotations, but at which there were not purchasers. SALTPETRE.-400 bags Bengal sold at 25s 6d for 5 per cent. refraction, which is barely the former value. TALLOWY.—P.Y.C. is 48s per cwt. on the spot, and Town 52s 6d. TZA.—The market is rather duller. dialt STS SMITIIFIELD.—Meadow Hay, 215 s to 3 1 183; Clover ditto 315 s to 4/ 18s ; and Straw, 11 10s to 11 13 3 p er l oa d . T rade dull, at the above quotations. CumnERLAND.-111eadow Hay, 2/ 83 to 41; Clover, ditto, 3/ 5s to 41 17s; and Straw, 11 lOs to 1/ 14s per load. Supply moderately good, and trad e ra th er d u ll . WHITECHAPIL—Meadow Hay, 21 5s to 4/; Clover ditto, 31 10s to 513 s ; and Straw, 11 lOs to 1/ 14s per load. A full average supply, and a heavy demand. (From the London New Price Current of December 1.) SUGAR.--Today although importers of West India Sugar of every kind were desirous to realise, and submitted to a re duction on the rates of Friday, of is for brown, inferior yellow, and grey, and 6d per cwt for the better qualities of yellow and grey, still all kinds were purchased with caution for the scale and pan, the private operations amounting to only 250 hhds and tres. The parcels offered at public sale were only in part sold at a fall on last week's rates of 6d to ls, the decline being more apparent on the lower sorts. REFINED.—To-day there was only a limited demand for Refined goods from the home trade, and lower rates were taken, that is to say, 61s for brown melting lumps, 62s to 62s 6d for brown grocery, and 63s to 635 6d for standard lumps. Bonded crushed Sugar was purchased with increased freedom, and prices advanced from 335 to 335 6d per cwt for first quality. MAunmus.—This afternoon the quantity offered at public sale amounted to 5,437 bags, but little desire was manifested to operate, and a part only sold, although a reduction en former rates of 6d to is per cwt was submitted to. EAST INDIA.—This afternoon three parcels of Bengal Sugar, amounting to 5,201 bags, were b rou g ht to p ublic sale; merchants were inclined to realise, and submitted to a reduction on former rates of 6d to Is per cwt, but nearly the whole sold. This afternoon, at public sale, 74 puns of new St. Vincent's Molasses were taken in at 225. FOREIGN.—This afternoon there wa.: little desire evinced ' to operate in F o reign Sugar, and 123 2*- eases and 10 bar rels of Bohe a a t public sale were only in part Id at rather lower rates, middling greyish white went at 508, 48s 6d, fine yellow 47s to 47s Gd, good 465, middling 45s to 45a low 44s to 455, good brown 43s 6d, washe4 35s to 45s 6d per cwt. CoFF2,l3.—This afternoon Plantation Ceylon Coffee met with increased attention, and 2,051 bags 81 casks at auction were sold at full prices, viz.—mid greyish Demerara kind at 58s to 645, low mid 54s to 575, fine fine ord 49s to 535, fine ord 46s 6d to 48s, goed ord 44s to 45s 6d, ord 41s to 42s Gd, pea berry 50s to 62a 6d, triage 36s to 40s, and damaged 35s to 495. Native was only in limited demand privately, and 300 bags at auction were all taken in at 37s for good ord pale, which was the former value. TEA. —Today there was only a moderate business trans acted in Black or Green Tea, but holders were firm, and in sisted upon previous rates: common sound Congou for cash was not to be obtained under 10d per lb. Letters have been received from Canton to the 25th September; the shipments for England up to that peri•id, in round numbers, were 8,000,000 lb, against 13,000,000 to the corresponding pe:•iod last year ; the deficiency consisted of about 4,000,000 lb in Congou and 1,000,000 lb in Scented Teas. Rica.—To-daythere was no public sale of East India Rice, and the few parcels sold privately were at barely former rates. FlWlT.—Although the quantity arrived has been immense, still prices rule high, the trade operating largely. Patrss Currants 568 to 578 Zante and Cephalonia 555. Of Musca tels there are f r ee sellers , and of Turkey Figs some of the im porters ECOM determined to force sales at almost any price. Valentia Riisinq of good cp , ditv in tlem , ind at 469, hut for : INDI(.IO.—Eur _LAIL 11Ma there fl ueell gwil C.XFVf. demand for all sorts, and the home trade have been pur chasers to a fair extent. The rates paid show an advance A...--, ...... ~n those of the last quarterly sales o f 2d to ad for Baal -al and 1114dras. At public sale 68 serons of Guatemala 11)41 partly disposed of at fully former rates. . ~, 1 . !Inge Co • nugLAA,.— A ;.1, art noo . the Inant-itv ooero : td, L .. ~. , but sale was large, and amoutaed to 165 bags, ;411 116 ' 1141 ' former the demand Wiis less active, and a part onlj'rsokt st• ' rates. SAL r -- PETRIE.—Rough has attracted attention, o were an d th e ar: eAs disposed of privately were at rather higher prices. bagsl4l' supply at market is less tltau it was. At. and ion 400 Calcutta were disposed of at 25s 6d for good ) riddling 14ceri rather damp small chystal, 7 per cent refract ion. I %°g " Refined h;: s 1,,,, ;,, ~,,,, 11,-.0 , P kw; are firm for Nitrate of Soda p tial lee g r,e l e i nsh a ,to n la d del p arsr 2.l4a:cers:::'le rule Refined and the ills.t,toileo(2lM-0 to realise, p' tradeiper r t u n pu laa re sit h th a tio , ku i e ii n g h all descriptionsdofSou ie ..a.ippi) tio.• ,t•g 1...1ea5?. with caution, whilst there are few export orders, a decline in . the value of .r here ~,, -4, d the consumption being good. At auction 10 , ) tune wier isposecrot, fine quality at 29/ to 29/ ss, and g ood 281 Os per tun. s,evlel l' er A ,rs L a L o o lfi N r v ii4 . , — ieedP l:nporters of Russian are still desir It s s t l : o ) s 3 l l o, i , s v e ., : . and have submi!te.d to a further reduction ; on the . e m t :I I u h r,; s h 3 b - e ee ll?,w eg e r fl i t t : C a e t d4.7bsll)::43 CW t. For forward delivery very few contras .s ha re d there a entered into. Town Tallow is ' - supply, ' in ood at - onsumptioa sellers at 49s to 49s 9d nett cash, although . the c is diminished. twt::lerS'sb e.l)::nr V...... 1..W° /ILIA datORRIIMMIIIIMPO7 -------- .-------- .... , ~,,. 0 ,40 WORKS by ROBERT .1. fIITLYERWELL. AS.D. I& ' One Shilling eseh. loy post Ono and six )4aat 3 r IFt ON SINGLE and MARIt}7,9 (An Original Medical lllstory.' 10- --3111 CONTENTS: ~ .4, ra Analysis of the Affections -Early Conventional ..-„ pa t o pniti direction-Marital Anticipations and Realities -La wa fu ltous o trite' r ov Maternal Influenee-the,orriena of Gestation -( 0 ., 3 r d a ges Infertile Unions-Incongruous Alliances - Late Js gxp e- 4 eno ° Matches--Curiosities of Twenty-three Yea rs' Me aci" kc. S. , - 2. s , - Off' HASTITY and its INFRINGED!' -11118 ,i• , (An Essay for 1846.) i " 44'. urnan ills and frailties I diSeOtlrSe , _..., A _ 711 taught by nature, and by art a' Itleut2,;,. ..„,.. 7 \ l O wb f h :' e gl i lefitonceard, and disappointme an g T s sge, Ch lc. 3; , ' l o y un an g d an th d , f in en a t t l e e d , - th a e i r s a us tu tai red n. ' sg"' lit'lluilly spiit, herein counsel's gain: VOW health, r how hope, how haPl 9l6O ° te .''. ' 1 . 1 . - 3. iIIAT to EAT, DRINK, and AV Z 1) 'With Diet Tables for all Complain . Is- a foliar , : Contents :-lIOw to ensure perfect digestion , t ra6l , 4 d BY a n i : e r good night's resf.i h•clear head, and a contented feelvle. ° talcs servance of the instructions herein contained the 4nn oaf . 1, -- ale vously deice . e i even to the most shattered conea ~1 " i, Is be''' .- the greatest amount of physical happiness, a nd r full period of life allotted to man. „t shun , " How we should live-what eat, whit drink, • ,u a To reach in health full threescore years and la ~„,-,Th, , suble cig ; These interesting little volumes, although bearif lg i " - A 0 , WO_ very delicate import, as their titles imply, wil l '''' 3 . tr7 11.4"---g a c aTo 4 curable and general utility, for they tell of matte fs e w f0rm,,, ,1- g o ture able t,,, understand ought to know, but 1, IW' t i 'd g ated ''''" these enlightened times, except that quail P 19 co ot questionab e lutnmels, is at a very terrible disco , att . hi dden Va li ii ,t In the exposition hereby offered of the till n na „f relief , , it ‘ cirsa nature, of human disappointments and their IV.; ref', o wn P' l „.'„ t We contended that every reader rhall become his or "I" u pon t h e Da , any more than their own lawyer, , '. - It Ris ins i stet ~., •zation , r„;uallY should know the simple principles of our own or if , " -- „ o wl's' "- k ilo" whereby our existence and the issue thereof In t belr , _ ur tudfs..,,a ... i • ...ultil• -- states depend, the duties that arc expected of - - ..,:the ..-- ei. capacities in the family circle, and the terms on 1 en •••,,,,,e to r n otel happiness of the present and future race of want in d l ily il n • • es By such knowledge, and which is herein Laittignd n• roes health will be found to be in our own keel Hereof in 0..0; within the attainment of all ; by tha availmen t , b on o ur on la our duty to ourselves, we secure the lit e advant fg e ''. whic h uall ~,,, ties. ~ay to follow, and finally by the cultivation of our b s• - __ , a s the:: k ip's' consistent with degenerate health, the mind as v re' ', n oes la' - be exalted to the summit of perfection, as best be - ~,, 0 ;41' of God's creations. , of his a . „ a sa.; The author's justification for this seeming era' 'g• uust ranted that tli. ings, and the avowal of their integrity of purpoSi s. ' „owe by their perusal-his accredited qualification/ 3 gn: -suit 141. topics broached involve his legitimate study add P"" . cjirral l ta; of To be had of Sherwood, 23,PPaternoste r, is• 3 9, Cori i 0 ta Fleet-street ; ll4nnay, 63, Oxford. street ; Maw !,,. vet ( le 7, the s dimet from the Author, 10, Argyle-place. Rege n v-- 'o ll3ll f:si° Great Marlborough-strew), who may be advised PI, oeo t• , ~ matters daily till Three, and in the Evenings fro Se- --- -- 0 116° - A POPULAR TREATISE on the HEALTH , L rt. ro sole' of the BODILY FUNCTI ON. 3- rest a NINETEETU EDITION, price 2s. 6d. ; Free SY Wo nt Envelope) 3s. 6d-, ‘ A'ecliClP ro tora' T HE SILENT FRIEND. A en the loss of the reproductive powers; w Bed 11, A— tion. The baneful effects of Indulgence, negl r'evioltrsg condary Symptoms, &c., are fully pointed out. ` • PERRY and Co., Consulting e Surgeons, Loudon.s Beg . Published by the Authors, and may be bad., ' I. 0 6, 00 r Sold by Strange, No. 21, Paternoster -rosy ; Gory' , n 1 i v`" street ; Purkis, Comn-street Soho ; street, and 37, Ro 3 al pto Exchange . and all 1)0 0 kS ell to il l t s „r of ce tn HanneY O r ; ;. e w bo Part I. of this Work is particularly address € " .00gly:ciotioa prevented from forming a Matrimonial Alliance, t 2 RAN" Uhl disqualifications, and will be: - eund an avail oPi' c od- o ei l O r the means of perfect and seas. restoration to ero ' P o i ( 11° 0 , 0 0° 1 Part 11. treats perspicuously upon those forms loc tio e ntst in their primary or secondary state, arising fra: oedic & cted nrhow numbers who neglect to obtain competent dire upon themselves years of misery and suffering. ss The CORDIAL BALM OF SYRIACUM is e% c vrea k a n n e d :10 11 t i. the cure of nervous and sexual debility, irregula r- J oß bits. ne r reneess, loss of appetite, indigestion, consumPt -iY , e O,lV' ties arising from venereal excesses, &c. Price 115 " and' tie. The Five-pound cases may be had as usual. CE, „r ata Yr The CONCENTRATED DETERSIVE ESSE blood " d boa/ ;12 4 ce ill , syphilitic remedy for searching out and par.,i n g fa tre Ate nereal contamintion, scurvy blotches on the he'-'" , im prelN' ~iIS front ulcerations, and a those pallid , affections ads. ng ' went, secondarysymptoms, and all eruptions 9-f the .sue and 335. pe S r bottle. 20- 91. reO Y PERRY' PURIFYING SPECIFIC PILLS, tu. , ea str ictu d tO and I Is. per box. are the most effectual remedy to r h iodr o flammation, irritation of the bladder, ice., withou t peel/melW business. 0 , ,-- riel Consultation fee, if by Letter, 1/. A minute deut.,,stt cessary. Messrs. Perry are in daily attendance At ter. , 19, liemers-street, Oxford-street, London, from siege! five till eight; and on Sundays from eleven till tv !eive. ON THE SECRET INFIRMITIES OF VOUTH 21sv MATURITY. v it,lo s ' 0 6 WITH TWENTY-FIVE COLOURED ENGIIA , --,c, P,,, ' . Just published, Twentieth Thousand, in a sealed enve'y6tawr 2s. fin., or post paid, to any address, fords. 6d. in l'o' is. ,e direct from the Author's residence. e l fr ost !' y SELF. PRESERVATION : A Mlaitd ikis t tei lt y on the Secret Infirmities and Disorders of Youth ''",,,- l,f,' o ,as Illustrated with Twenty-five Coloured Plat's en t „'"tice v b tvi o g, Physiology, and Diseases of the Urinary and ltePrct - t aid '1" erne; explaining their various structures, uses, and ft) ucti° l ',4o, ii i , s i e rvoU; the injuries that are produced In them, by solits II l ia r et of "' A O °' excesses. With Practical Observations'on the T rcatinther discos Debility, Local and Constitutional Weakness, a vdt ° , the Urethra. ( 00 ,,, roll , 0 ,1 6 ., i t eo By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONSULTING 13-1 '.:• - - , o 9, Bedford-street, Bedford-square , - 0 bur p. ~n,ite Matriculated Member of the University of E' ii n ,,, Lic e " Member of the London Hospital Medical Bode"' ArsO l Apothecaries' Hall, London, &c., &c. Sin - s CONTENTS OF THE TREATOV%.,,,t, 10 ceioli t io CHAPTER 1. On the Philosophy of Marriag e, ":,, i ,etive ne eet 3 , o t and 0 bligations, and on Infelicitous and 1 -InP ly- i. the - oat P o . Cnarrza 2. On the Anatomy and Physioll'a ° p roving t hyse t 'oe Organs, their flinctions, structures, and secretio. ns A 11 " 31 0 °a , we' Mental and Physical Power are dependant Up O AZ • eil -- foci, e i c —CHAPTER 3. On Solitary Habits; their va " to . 1 til° e o °. Op of the Stomach, Lungs, and Brain, Animal Economy; the concealed cause of DOW , w ain o f 1 9 .. ,,, an d g eneiTl io rders i volltio6; Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On the Secret 1 r , ,0ci 4 od 6 ' 0 6, and Maturity, and the Tr ea t men t of Nervous all:"ja 6 cos or Mental Debility, and Premature Decay — "l;• . oo' the Disorders arising from indiscriminato -- t i v s. g olf ' ti T y li 3 ha • ci .; .ing_ wor fro. b un ie l e:::;i:7 o; Gleet, Strictures, and other Diseases of the t rre l e gall y of went xIS A , riClie e _ n p fled., Th me e di a c u a th m or an of , w th h is o " s h in vi tts g E al e w v i d O an e f n d talen w- „,,,isider a -.. the I°-- bie 841 ; the Ur Itment of the various disorders 8 . 14 , • ars --,,, vvu l- , e ro o ' act as a salutary warning to frailtie,s of early indiscretion. The engral l ",t, eaSe 6s- Aiy it 4, is le Or dition, by demonstrating the consequencesv•,/, annAt , evesuestions may be satisfactorily reped to wee 63, Peal to the most confidential friend.' --: , Er „ a t - 110_,, re6 and C°" l 46 ' Published by the Author, and may be 11 %. - .aa jamv iar ,fol a ol Leadenhall-street. London; from Kent and Richard.i, 52, Paternoster - r ow; t+ ti " - Divew - Oxford-street, Starle, Tichborne-street. Qu a “,_ r est er ' t fe eon ) sat o oli N y e o w ut t h on a . nir n , o, and by all Booksellers. Nine 0 0 l'il it 000 At Home for Consultation daily, from n , „,sp Five till Eight ; and all letters immediately re.,, to P - the tee of 11., for advice.&c.-9 BEDFORP-R" ISQU A 11E. LON no to 3:Thlm:ll° s''- sl'' peasant, SfixouLArt, BIRTH.—On Monday las e .: , —;_ ea„,44 ; •••• -7 , e _title ---- - _r" - -- --''-'-''--___, -- ---- t i o. at L i . of i/ r, -- - s h i a x nd n , g w p ri , s " , near Charleville, Mrs. M'ffanraha a, th le chi 0 three hweaasdss,afpeelyrfedcetliyiver'oer'lmeOdf, tialfdertit;:ihtelireigibeilti which was more than double the sif , e ° .,d wAS f '! it born, ' fingers . It was at first supposed the el' l ' E d, stV, E , t u o rL do tim we e ll a : a (i)n s hg b a e tdi e , f a i hF i li constantn seenxoer mrtoiounss a ht she is nixn:c::,,onsllsdi L I :: i e e a... 7: ovate rie od t 1 0 : 41 . - 0 t.isoli jay.9.oPnruorif of00b00;00, ger. On a previous confine inert she was ilell tia • tb e son vineda tw,hwt b i presen t u t afterli like l y i 3 ~ ,h WEST INDIA PRODUCE. --A ve:,sel 00'1 fidelity-4' St. liatherino's Docks from Nassau, No v I , l ,foo ds ~,,P " has brought, besides an extensive variety °' ; of P' . manufacturing and deing purposes. 707 W e t) ip 01; served turtle, and 70 barrels, containing 17,9„°,•s her f ber, of the forbidden fruit, as it is called. 1124,0er ° used for the purpoe of preserving, After the c o al ill illr orange marmalade, which it much reset:obis' pearance and taste. $O O/1 i t pl3°, 00: [ADVERTISEMENT.] —TAE EARL OF J' i ; r tlai p, iti:s o ' colons HOLLOWAY'S PILLs.—An astoanding cur e . ~:j. S'ee; Fat'D ts t i ii n s edicine after every other means had fa. l- vg no!i, O . from 21, Lordship ' s letter, dated " Villa Messi:l4:o,lootori' 1845. To Professor Hollows Sir, I beg to ~,,r 0.. 41 ;yet t t1 „1 your pills have effected a cure of a disorder in re) , i- and 00 ". - t a's "" which all the most eminent of the faculty at hoi ae t he "" i feir Continent had not been able to effect ; say, nit 5 1 ' 5 1, The'', OW Carlsbad or Marienbad." (Signed) " ALDBOROIi On• ~ ..„...,,,01,, 44. 0 rful pills will cure any disease of the liver or stonitcL,oo;ostl Holloway's Ointment) at Professor litaDADe al Strand, London, and by all medicine vendors tiro 1.0 world i On Saturday last, at GrZiliLe, near Lee: ls ' ti° 11 ' cliu. Joseph Middleton, Esq., barrister -at-law, of a LlVlnatoo, ° gilt° oli' On the 25th ult., the wife of Mr. Ralph POO"' it citor, of a son. lis,4 jam Ot e i s t G he am 2s b t i l e i r u , lotf.,aaston7dogan• place, gm r- I el 13 Ol e& of a daughter. Sa °l° On the 26th ult., at Boulogne, the wife of th eP I ' it , y O re, Ethsrie.,2o6ftandau.ultg.htealt..County-terrace, Carn " t3r s e til l— P t , ic 11 N h o e re. road, the wife of Mr. 'John M'Alpin, of a (laugh ter,George TaOttietrtshaell,2E7,tshri.u,lotf.,,ainsoLiTndes-square, the it .° Georg ° REeOidn, o t f he a 2 8 : n th . ult in Cadogan-place, the w ile of E . 911 4 WI. On the 28th ult., at Carlton -villas, Maida-v it" , 3/f.3. On the 28th ult., at Oxford -terrace, Ilyde-par G. Ward, of a daughter. ~ til e MARIZIED. Hano ver- On the' 28th ult., at St. George's, nanove A lion. Beilby Llwley, eldest son titer Lord Wenlioscrtik,titoliefeEt- Elizabeth Grosvet?or, third daug of the , Pr i ' minster. Dr. iniatrhdene2rd, to,f)Amuagurnston.livasttiauagthttheer Britisho f Coi E e IlinSbpaiscer. DLO. jaOn the 21st nit., at Inverness, Diary, the Wife of vf meason, Esq. On the 22c1 ult., at Kensington, goy, relict of the rg C. Dyer, M.A., Rector of Abbess Ilocling, Essex,,°ge ittelf On the 25th ult., t I'V estop-suner-Mare, aria, if the late J. 0. Good"tbard•, gni! 90. . • Ospistet On the 25th ult., at Ne'svq.NVeindsor, rilr..aldeoniin „loot HiltnonthiT.26th ult., at the Priory, Great Dialver , ' On the 26th e I:l:llcl.;antg(e3dijl9dford, Surrey' llisl7'"igficle.f' : Sigh t tl l hi le ew 2 2l. s sL t : 25th nit., at Milifichl ilouse, Vork, il I h, Esq. agcd 66. 00g-1101156 B,,,,r?linteni:23.l7.[Nuriict. ,ait,Glt.ellgeorFoaogteciG6osa;rds : Se 0 dt)l,ltli.,lizaatbeGtrhoN,:,7.,:filtoburesae,d,l%ogensTo-Pte.........' tll ....,. _., 410 of the Savoy, I 4 I.he COLIatY of 'mid 0. oember 2, 1846: ;. -1) 0 . • ' .. ;1 14 ',# on IV