The Sun. — London, England, 1846-12-21 00:00:00

RAILWAY. PARKER v. 510RELL. VICE CHANCERY COURT, Dec. 19. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND SNOW V. HOLL.--- WRITING LETTERS TO A JUDGE. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Dec. 18. A HORSE CASE.--SPINKS V. BARDELL. (Continued from our Saturday Morning Edition.) The Learned JUDGE summed up the case at length. He should ask the jury to decide two material questions in the cause; first, whether there was such a misrepre sentation as to make the sale void, so that no property would pass to the defendant; next, did the plaintiff know the horse was unsound when he sold it. Jr Spinks con ducted himself fraudulently in the sale, and Bardell was induced to purchase the horse by such fraudulent repre sentation, then the contract would be void, and the pro perty in the horse never passed to Mr. Bardell and never was his horse. The jury consulted together for above half an hour in the box, but could not agree, and they at last withdrew to consider their verdict. The jury, at a late hour came into Court, and by their Foreman announced—that with reference to Lord Den man's first question ' they were of opi n i on th at t h e f a l se renresentations alluded to therein were made by the plaintiff ; but they were not agreed that the defendant in making the purchase of the horse was influenced there by; and, with refercnc to the second question, they did not find that the plaintiff knew of the horse's unsound ness at the time that the sale of the horse to defendant took place. In effect, therefore, the verdict is for the plaintiff. December 19. :.*;PINKS BARBELL. In this case, which wa; reported in our late edition of yesterday, the verdict was entered for the plaintiff. The finding was tantamount to a verdict for both the plaintiff and defendant, as the jury found for the plaintiff on one count and for the defendant on another—but the verdict was so entered. ELMSLIE V. BAXTER AND OTHERS.—THE MSG AND REIGATE RAILWAY. Mr. Crowder, Q C., was for the plaintiff, and Mr. Sergeant Allen for the defendant This was an action to recover 110/, being the balance of an account for work and labour rendered by the plaintiff to the defendants under the following circum stances :—The plaintiff is a civil engineer, at present engaged under the Government upon ord nance surveys, and in the autumn of last year he was engaged as the engineer of the Tring and Reigate Railway. The defendants, Messrs. Baxter, Dixon, and Co., were the solicitors to the company, which was only projected six weeks before the memor able 30th of November, but finding they could not com plete the reference-books by that day, they called the aid of the plaintiff into requisition, and he and a stiff of 12 assistants were engaged for some days before the 30th in making eight copies; the company were, therefore, enabled to deposit the plans by the proper time, but as the " panic" had made speculators fearful, and money, consequently, " tight," the project fell to the ground, in consequence of its promoters not being able to deposit the requisite amount. The plaintiff and his assistants were engaged almost night and day upon the work. The assistants were employed at the office of the plaintiff, in Abingdon-striet, and were boarded by him during the period. Ile charged 2/. 2s. per day per man, a small sum the Learned Counsel said, considering the t'me and the great diffi • culty experienced in getting persons to perform the work. Ile charged 1-171., but the defendants had charged the company 4604 for the work. He had received 301. and 40/. had been paid into court, thus reducing the claim to 70/. The defendants denied the liability beyond the above amount. The defence was that the charge was exorbi ant, and that the plaintiff had charged for the work in a bill sent in by him to the committee of management. Even tually the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for 50/. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Dec. 19. In this cause, BA.RNARD v. C 01.1.9. Attorney - General, Mr, which w i a i l a part heard yesterday, the rtin, and Mr. Cleasby ap peared for the plaintiff ;Mr. M. Chambers and Mr. Bramwell for the defendant. This was an action in which the plaintiff sought to re cover the sum of 457/., alleged to be due under the fol lowing circumstances : It appeared that the defendant was formerly the proprietor of the Rainbow Tavern, Fleet-street, which was subsequently taken by Mr. Isaac Argent, who was, prior to that, a waiter at the tavern. This person con a.Vi ; ( j usiness of the tavern for several years, until, • 44, he became a bankrupt The plaintiff - arge amount under the bankruptcy, but for e ''' 4.--L- :- - - x a - a h' -. py,-.. oust, due to tin as a balance upon some 1V. 4 6 " 1 * . 10 - Jig. sbe preferred to bring his action against IP 1 fr ?' •.... V n , 0 4. tC .1 '' li • ---"- ;t: i "F.: 4 ...,, j LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Dec. 19. The Lord Chancellor sat in the Old Hall, Lincoln's Inn, to•day. BREYNTON V. THE LONDON AND NORTH-WESTERN This case came before his Lordship by special per to day for the purp .se of discharging an order made by his Lordship the Master of the Rolls, a few days since, by which he dissolved an injunction obtained ex-parte by the plaintiff restraining the London and North-Western Railway Company from lowering the turnpike•road at a particular part, and taking the railway over it, and also ordered the plaintiff to pay the costs of a motion of which he had given notice to extend the injunction. The facts of the cas e out of which this appeal from the judgment of the Master of the Rolls arose may be thus stated :—An . Act of Parliament having passed for the making of a railway from Stafford to Rugby, the railway was commenced. The name by which it was usually denominated was the Trent Valley Railway ; but being afterwards purchased by the Lon don and Birmingham Railway Company, it now goes by the name of the London and North Western Railway. The plaintiff, William Breynton, being in possession of three acres of land, used for brick-making, in the pa rish of Armitage, on the line of the railway, the com pany required about a rood and thirty•eight perches thereof for the purposes of the railway : and on the 26th of July last they entered into au agreement with him for the purchase thereof, and the price of the land, as well as compensation for severance and all other damages settled by arbitration. By the agreement the lands were stated to be purchased by the company for the purpose of constructing their railway according to the plans and sections representing the manner in which it was to be constructed. After crossing the plaintiff's ground, the railway had to cross an old turnpike road, and then it entered on land belonging to one William Robinson, with whom the company had on the 30th of Jnne last agreed for the purchase of so much of his land as they required for 701., if they should make the road pass under the railway, and not raise it up so as to cross the railway on a level with it; but if they took the latter course, he said he would not take less than 1001. The company resolved upon sinking the road so as to pass below the railway. By the Railway Clauses Consolida tion Act, no line of railway can be constructed, so as that any road may cross it on a level with it, unless the special Act contains an express enactment to the con trary. In this ease there was such a clause in the special Act. It appeared that the plaintiff bad himself bean desirous of having the road to pass under the rail way, and made affidavits to that effect. However, he was now dissatisfied, and wished the Company to make the road pass the railway on a level, as was origin2lly intended. They refused, and in September last he filed his bill for a specific performance of his agreement, and the very next day he moved for an injunction, which was granted, with leave to apply in four or five days. The injunction was to restrain the Company, their agents, servants, and workmen from lowering or excavating the carriage road so as to interfere with or affect the plain tiff's land in any manner inconsistent with the provisions of the Trent Valley Railway Act of Parliament, or the plans or sections therein referred to, or the agreement of the 26th of July, 1846, in the planitiff's bill mentioned. The plaintiff having moved to extend the injunction, the defendants moved to dissolve it; and both motions came cn to be heard. The motion to dissolve was heard first, inasmuch as, if it was suc cessful, the plaintiff would then have no locus standi. The Master of the Rolls took lime to consider his judg ment, and in a few days his Lordship pronounced the order that was now sought to be discharged. Mr. Cooper and Mr. Cooke were for the appellant ; and Mr. Bethel!, Mr. Follett, and Mr. Bazalgette ap pared to support the decision of the Court below. The LORD CHANCELLOR, without calling upon the Counsel fur the respondents to address the Court, gave judgment, refusing to grant the injunction, and thereby affirming the decision of the Court below with costs. The further arguments in this part heard appcal oc cupied his Lordship the remainder of the morning. The VICE-CHANCELLOR Of ENGLAND, 011 taking his seat this morning, stated that Mr. Snow, the plaintiff in the cause of Snow v. 1011, had occasionally favoured him by sending affidavits of letters from Brussels. Yesterday o❑ leaving the Court, he found a printed letter from the same individual, in which he talked about the fraud, con spiracy, and corruption of the bar, and in which also a statement was made that certain persons, among whom he (the Vice-Chancellor) was one, were directors of a society which was called " The Legal Insurance So ciety." Now, he begged to state that he had never had anything to do with that society, but as the letter was a libel on the bar, he thought he could not do better than make them a present of it. His Honour then handed the letter down to the registrar for the bar, to make such use of it as they might think fit. Mr. BETHELL observed that the Court would recollect that Mr. Snow was unfortunately connected with that wicked scheme, called " The West Middlesex Insurance Company." - (Before Vice• Chancellor Sir J. K. BRUCE). WORTH V. WILSON. This was a motion on the part of the plaintiff for the production in Court and restoration to her custody, of three of her infant children, who had been abducted by the defendant, who was their maternal grandmother. It appearM that the father and mother of these children had, for two months before his demise, frequented a Roman Catholic chapel, from which it seems that the defendant, who was a Protestant, was apprehensive that they would be brought up as Roman Catholics, and upon the occasion of their being on a visit with her at Hastings she removed them secretly to London, where they now reside. A habeas corpus was granted, which had been served upon the sersant of the defendant, at her residence in Portland place, London, she refusing to appear. It was contended in support of the motion, that as there were no testamentary guardians, the Court could not refuse the application. It being stated on the part of the defendant, that it was her intention to present a petition on the suit, His HONOUR directed the case to remain over till Mon day, stating at the same time that he would hold those who had the children in their possession, answerable for their production when such was ordered by the Court. the defendant on the ground that he was a partner with the bankrupt. In support of the plaintiff's case a number of wit• nesses were called, to prove that defendant sometimes gave orders for goods for the use of the tavern. On the part of the defendant Mr. M. CHAMBERS con tended that there was not the least ground for the pre sent action. The plaintiff was not in business at present; he formerly carried on business as a wine merchant in New Broad. street. Mr. Argent, the late proprietor of the Rainbow Tavern, had been in the habit of discounting bills to a large amount for the present plaintiff; these transactions extended over a long period of years. The defendant in the present action made an agreement to let the business of the Rainbow Tavern to Mr. Argent at the rate of 101. per week, but the business was to be carried on as formerly under the name of Coils, and there was a further condition in the agreement preventing Mr. Argent from discounting, accepting, or endorsing any bills of exchange without the previous consent had and obtained of the present defendant. The defendant never ordered the wine, the payment of which was now sought; never knew of its delivery, and, further, the account was kept in the books of the plaintiff in the name of Argent only, the invoice was made out in his name, and beyond all that, the plaintiff knew perfectly that Coils had given up all con nexion whatever with the tavern; there was not, there fore, the slightest ground for bringing the present action against the defendant. Mr. Isaac Argent was then called, who stated that he was the brother-in-law of the defendant, who formerly waited at the Rainbow Tavern; had been in the habit of discounting bills for the plaintiff and others to a very large mount. By the Loan CHIEF BARON—He had formerly been in business, and had saved a considerable sum of money. The INDRR-SHERIFF—This evidence appears very co. ncluiivo at present. TIMIMAS admitted it was, anl that he c )uld not p ress the di , fence. The ~'PrY found for the amount chimed. BAGOT L. SYERS. •or I ls, of it. Yates was then up against the wall, per haps tko or three yards from the men. I was standing beside Catherine. Yates gave a groan out when against the wall. They all went up to Yates again, and there was a big splash in the water. The water was very rough, and Yates was gone, but I do not know which of them laid hands on him. I heard no noise from Yates after I heard the splash. Catherine said, " What have you done that fur ?" and Ihik,r said. " If you don't mind yourself you'll get the same." We all then walked up towards the bridge, Raine and marker at the side of us, and Breckun in front. When we got to the middle of the bridge Barker asked me if I would tell about it, and I said I never would. Barker asked me that down the sills. I then also said I never would tell. He asked Catherine, and she did not answer him. On the bridge, when he asked me, and I said " I would not," he said, " So help you God, you never will." I said so after him. He then asked Catherine, and she said, " She would be if she didn't tell the police as soon as she got into the town." I lost sight of Catherine not over a minute after she said she would tell the police. I never saw her again alive. I saw where Catherine Raine went to—she went into the river. Breckon ar,d Raine and Barker went with me after this. Barker said, "If he thought I would tell, he would fling me in too." Bteekon said, "If I did tell, God would strike me dead in a minute." Before that Raine and Barker swore rue On the bridge not to tell. They swore me a second time on the bridge, after Catherine disappeared. I parted with them that night beside our own door. They then went on to Briggate end, towards Thorngate. I went home, and went to bed. This wag at 1 action on a bill of exchange. Defendant pleaded that lit 3 did not accept, nordid he promise to pay. Mr. Maw A ppeared on behalf of the defendant to pro test against the trial proceeding, on the ground that there were two issues, and the notice was to try the " issue." It wa 1 contended for plaintiff it was all one issue. The UNDEIR-Sh 'mans said he could not refuse to try the cause, but wou.'d take a note of the objection. Evidence was theil adduced to prove the handwriting of the defendant, and. on that issue a verdict was given for plaintiff. WINTER ASSIZES. NORTHERN CIRCVIT.—York, Dec. 14 , (Before Mr. Justice CRESSWELL.) MURDERS AT STABO'FORTII, NEAR BARNARD CASTLE. —George Barker, 19,. John Bream, 24, and Thomas Routledge Raine,l9, against whom two true bills had been found for the murder of Joseph Yates and Catherine Raine, at Startforth, on the 10th of August, 1845, were charged with the wilful murder of the former. Mr. Bliss, Mr. Pullein e, and Mr. Overend. were counsel for the prosecution. M r. Matthews and Mr. Blanshard defended Barker and Re ine, and Mr. Pickering appeared on behalf of Breckon. The prisoners, who appeared cpite unconcerned, pleaded not guilty. Mr. Buss then stated the case to the jury. Gentle• men, this is not a case which depends upon w h a t i s called circumstantial evidence. It depends on the tes • timony of an eye-witness, who was present at the time the crime was committed. Yet a good deal of circum stantial evidence will be offered and brought before you, not as creating a case of itself, but as affording reasons from which you may think that it will be safe for you to trust the testimony of the principal witness. The name of that witness is Ann Humphreys. The crime is charged to have been committed on the night between Saturday, the 9th, and Sunday, the 10th of August, in the year 1845. The place was near the bridge of Bar nard Castle, on the Yorkshire side of the river Tees. The person who was murdered was Joseph Yates, a tailor, and residing in Barnard Castle, in Galgate. 'The prisoners belong to Barnard Castle. Some time is the month of August, 1844, Barker came to de ceased with a coat, which he desired might be altered for him. Barker gave this account of the coat, that "it was Cotherstone clip, and ranter fashion," and that he had bought it at the sale of Captain Bainbridge. Captain Bainbridge was a person who occupied a house at Cotberstona, and in his house a seizure had been made of his furniture in August, 1844, Barker being the person left in possession, In consequence of that seizure instructions were given to a solicitor named Coulthard to commence an action, and Yates was examined and subpoenaed to appear at York Assizes in July, 1845. Afterwards it was determined to proceed criminally against Barker. Yates was in formed of that determination, and he was told that he would not be wanted at those assizes, but would be wanted on a future occasion. The same information was also given to a person of the name of Walker, and Wal ker communicated that information to Barker, telling him that after the assia-s he would be criminally pro• ceeded against respecting the coat. From the fact of Yates having been subpoenaed respecting the matter, Barker conversed with Yates with respect to his account, threatened him, and inquired of him whether he intended to appear against him. You will hear the conversation that took place, and you will hear also the threats made use of by Barker ; and evidence will also be given by a person to whom Barker spoke, viz :—that he (Barker) desired that person to go with him in order to give Yates a good "milling." That took place on Saturday, the 9th of August, 1845, the very day on which the deceased Yates was killed. And now, gentlemen, I come to the detail of what occurred on that day. At about eight o'clock on that day Yates was seen in Thorngate, a street communicating with Briggate, which leads down to the bridge at Barnard Castle. He was seen to have a sovereign in his pccket. From eight o'clock in the evening until about half-past eleven or twelve, the de ceased was seen at several public-houses, drinking and dancing, and apparently in good health and spirits. Yates was a small man, with an effeminate voice. After he was seen at Lofthouse's, the last public-house he was at, he will be taken up from thence by another witness named Cooper, who walked with him down Briggate, across the bridge leading from Barnard Castle to Start forth, went to Startforth, returned again, and left him standing on the bridge ; thi s wou ld b e about twelve or one o'clock. The night in question was both dark and stormy. We shall find him next seen by a person named Robinson, who, in a little lane called the Lonning, lead ing from Briggate to th e r i ver , saw Catherine Raine come out of a public-house kept by a person of the name of Procter, and go into Briggate, where she and Yates met. Robinson then went into his own house, and the next we hear of him is by a witness named Dub son, who lives further up to Thorngate in Briggate, and who, being before his house smoking his pipe for some time, saw Yates and Catherine Raine pass , and repass towards the bridge and from the bridge. Dob son then went into his house, and this is the last we see of Joseph Yates and Catherine Raine until they are taken up by that important witness Ann Humphreys. We shall show that all the three prisoners were in Barnard Castle that Light, and in Briggate and the neighbourhood, and at last a witness named Wanless saw Barker and Breckon and Raine together, going down Briggate towards the bridge. And now, we come, gentlemen, to the testimony of Ann Humphreys. She was a girl working ut a factory at Barnard Cas:le, b( ing about 21 years of age, having had an illegitimate child, liviag in a house on the left hand of Briggate as you go down the street, with her father and sister and child.—(The Learned Counsel hue detailed the evidence of Ann Humphreys, as it will be found sub joined.) On the following morning (Sunday) Mrs. Alice Galland, wha resides at Startforth, and goes to Barnard Castle to Church, went, according to her custom, along this road to the bridge, and when she got to the place which I have mentioned, abut nine o'clock that morning, she observed a young man looking over the wall ; she als o noticed his movements, and was particularly struck with him. As she went along she saw blood upon the ground, and also observed blood on the stones of the wall. Both it and the young man excited her attention, and she spoke to him. In consequence of what he said she looked for marks of horses' feet. She saw none, but saw marks of human feet, as if apparently after a scufle, and saw the mark of a knee upon the soft ground, as if the knee of a person wearing corduroy trousers had been pressed against it. She went to church, and on her return she found that some mud had been put over the blood, and mud on the wall so as to obliterate or conceal the blood. She heard afterwards of the death of Yates. The exa mination took place in the month of July in the present year. She felt a curiosity to attend that examination, and whilst she was there she was struck with the ap pearance of Raine, but how far you think she identifies him will depend upon her evidence. On that same Sun day morning the parish clerk of Barnard Castle was proceeding to church, where he likewise observed the blood. A female named, Mary Ann Dalkin heard the cries on Saturday night, and the windows command a view of the place in question. On the Sunday morning she saw the three prisoners looking over the wall, and apparently busy with something there. Two days after this the body of Yates was found at a place about three or four miles lower down the river. It was observed that he had bruises on his body, and wounds or cuts, and at the back of his head there was a considerable injury, with coagulated blood, and blood in the nostrils coagulated. I consider that efferds some probable inference as to the cause of death, for unless it was coagulated until it got into the water, it will be for you to say whether the water would not have washed it off. Gentlemen, on the night in question the prisoner Barker went home to his lodgings, where, as will be proved by a person with whom he slept, he arrived some time. after the period I have spoken of. He will speak to you as to the state in which he appeared to be, and he will give you this further important evidence, that the next day, which was Sunday, before he (the witness) had heard of Yates being missing, Barker told him that Yates was gone. Add to that this circumstance also, that afterwards Barker cautioned him not to mention it; and, I believe, on more than one occasion, not to di rulge the fact he had mentioned to him. And now, gen tlemen, I come to another important stage of the case. Ann Humphreys made no disclosure of what she had seen that night, from the time it happened until the 26th of July in this year. Before that time she appeared to be in a state which will be described to you. On that day she had some conversation with a friend of hers, of the name of Sutcliffe. The result was, that Mrs. Sut cliffe took Ann Humphreys to a constable naniedPearson, who took her before the magistrates, and the prisoners were arrested, examined, and committed. The Court then adjourned till nine the next morning. - Decenaier 15. The Court sat this morning at nine o'clock, when the examination of witnesses for the prosecution was re• sumed. By Mr. BRANWELL—Purchased the Rainbow Tavern, and carried it on from the time of taking possession until his bankruptcy, in 1844. Defendant had nothing whatever to do with the business; he never slept in the house once in a twelvemonth; he resided in the country, and upon every occasion► when he came to ton n he used to come to the Rainbow Tavern. He always paid for everything he had in the same manner as any other customer. He did so to encourage witness. The plaintiff, and his clerk, Mr. Hayes, used to come very frequently to witness, and request him to purchase wine of him. He said that he could not purchase his wine, as he was bound by his agreement not to do so, without the consent of the defendant. At the time of his bank ruptcy, defendant obtained execution against him, and took possession of the tavern ; since that time he had been living as a waiter at the tavern, having no other interest whatever in the business. The case for the prosecution was not brought to a close until halt-past two o'clock in the afternoon. Mr. MATTnEws rose to address the jury on behalf of the prisoners Barker and Raine. As to Barker, he should prove an alibi. He should prove that he was in the house at the time assigned by Ann Humphreys f o r th e commission of this atrocio us d ee d . He could not trace Raine in the same way, but he could trace him so far as he hoped would insure his acquittal also; because if Ann Humphreys' evidence was false as to Barker, he asked Low could it be believed as operating against Reim ? Mr. Pickering also addressed the jury for the prisoner Breckon. The witnesses for the defence were then examined with the view of proving an alibi in behalf of Barker; also that the evidence against Breckon and Raine was too conflicting to be depended upon; and that Yates and Catherine Raine were tipsy on the evening when they met with their deaths. Mr. MATTHEWS—That is the case for the defence, my Lord. The Court again adjourned. December 16. This morning the prisoners were again placed at the bar, after which Mr. Buss replied. Mr. Justice CRESSWELL then summed up the facts of the case most minutely, and in conclusion said, respect ing the testimony of Ann Humphreys, if they believed her story, they could make the crime no less than mur der, but if they disbelieved her, then they must acquit the prisoners, because whatever noises might have been heard, whatever appearances might have been presented at the spot where the murder wa, committed, they would be no proof that the prisoners had been guilty of the awful crime with which they were charged. If the jury, on a full investigation of the case, were convinced that the prisoners had committed the murder, then they must perform their duty, however painful it might be, and return a verdict of guilty. But if, on the contrary, they entert Lined any substantial doubt on the case, then they must give the prisoners the benefit of that doubt, and acquit them. The jury then retired, and at half-past ten o'clock at night returned into Court with a verdict of Not Guilty. Mr. OVEREND, on behalf of the prosecution, said that it had not been decided whether they should again ar raign the prisoners for the murder of Catherine Raine. York Courant. Cross-examined by the ATTORNEY-GENERAL—Re ceived a letter a short time since from Mr. Hayes, threatening to bring the present action against Coils. Had offered to pay 100/. out of his own pocket to plaintiff, rather than have the affair brought up again. The name of Coils was kept over the door; the license was in hia name, though, previous to his bankruptcy, the name of witness had been joined in the license. By a juror—Defendant knew nothing whatever of the wine having been sent by the plaintiff. Several other witnesses were then called, and The ATTORNEY-GENERAL replied. The LORD CHIEF BARON, in summing up, said that, in his opinion, the agreement between the parties was nothing more than an agreement to let the busi ness a kind of agreement totally new to him, which he believed altogether unprecedented, and, in his opinion, was altogether a fraud upon the re venue • d police laws applicable to taverns; and, there fore, so far as the agreement itself was relied upon as a defence, it Ras clearly altogether null and void, With respect to another part of the agree ment, namely, that part by which he was to receive 101. per week, if the jury were of opinion that such a sum was to be considered as a portion of the profits of the business, then the lessor was clearly liable; it was nothing more nor less than a partnership. The lessee had no powers whatever to discharge a servant or order wine without the consent of the lessor, and he was not at all surprised at the disastrous results which had occurred to Mr. Argent at least. The defendant had named 10/. a week for six years, and 50/. a year for six years, which amounted to the large sam-of 3,440/., and then he stepped in and took possession of all again. The jury, under all the circumstances, would censider whether the defendant had really parted with his interest in the business, and if so, whether the plaintiff knew of his ha'ing done so ; if they were of that opinion it would be their duty to return a verdict for the defendant. Tt e jury retired, and, after a short absence, returned into court with a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages, 457/. 6s. 2d. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MANSION HOUSE. Edmund Webber, a person of very gentlemanly appear ance, who has been some years in the employment of Messrs. Giles and Co., coin-factors, of Fowkes's-court, 'rower-street, was charged before the Lord Mayor with having embezzled the sum of 7001. and the sum of 2004 the property of the firm. Mr. J. Kirton, corn-chandler, of Charles-street, Mid dlesex, hospital, stated that he dealt with Messrs. Giles and Co., and that on the 11th of December he paid to the prisoner, on account of the firm, the sum of 561. 6s. 3d. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 19 , HALL V. GURNEY.-THE CHINESE EXHIBITION. This was an action brought by William John Hall, a wharfinger and general merchant of the city of London, against Mr. Samuel Gurney, jun., the son of the well known capitalist and money broker, to recover 5001., which it was alleged the defendant, as one of the executors of the late Mr. Dunn, the proprietor of the Chinese Exhibition, owed to the plaintiff, bcing the balance of commission still due on certain bonds to the Treasury, executed by the plaintiff, to allow the free importation, for the purposes of exhibition, of the col lection in question. Mr. Sergeant Byles and Mr. Sergeant Dowling ap peared for the plaintiff ; Mr. Sergeant Channel and Mr. -eeacock for the defendant. Mr.. Sergeant BYLES opened the case, stating that the present action arose out of the well-known collection of foreign curiosities at Hyde Park-corner, called the Chinese Exhibition. The pr , prietor of that exhibi tion, now deceased, was an American, who, having been engaged in business at Canton for some years, had selected a rare and valuable collection of articles, illus trative of the manners and customs of China, which, in the first place, were taken to Philadelphia, from whence it was transported to this country. Mr. Hall was the agent to arrange with the Custom House authorities. It resulted in the larding of the goods, and after some negotiation with the Custom House authorities, they were allowed to be taken out tbr six months, duty free, for the purposes of exhibition, on condition of a bond being given for 20,000/. to restore them at the end of that time. This was in 1841. At the end of the six months the bond was, on petition, re newed. Altogether the bonds were renewed five diff.rent times, half par cent. being charged on each bond as commission. To this was added 521. 125., as brokerage for the landing of the goods, and three guineas for each renewal of the bond. The articles were ultimately ad mitted by the Government duty free. Other payments of sums of money had, it was alleged, been made by Mr. Hall from time to time on account of the deceased. Mr. Dunn, while alive, had paid several sums towards these debt , , which reduced the amount claimed to about 5001. MP. P. M. Shepher 1, cashier at Messrs. Calvert's, the brewers, stated that he handed 99/. 18s. 9d., which was due to Messrs. Giles, to a per-on named Robinson, porter to the latter, on account of the firm. Robinson proved that he paid that sum into the hands of the prisoner. Mr. Henry Aste, corn dealer, proved that he paid, on the 7th of Decembar, into the hands of the prisoner, on account of Messrs. Giles, the sum of 7001. in a cheque. It was proved that riot one of these sums had been enter, d on the books, or received by the firm. Mr. Hobler, who appeared for the prosecu'or, sub mitted that there was no answer to any one of these cases. Mr. Ballantine (for the prisoner) admitted that there were undeniable grounds for committing the prisoner. The LORD MAYOR directed that the prisoner should be brought up on a future day, to be committed for trial. The prisoner, whose connexions are very respectable, wui deeply involved in railway speculations. RAILWAY SHAItE MARKETS. BRISTOL, DECEM BER 18. STOCK ExcnAsGE.--The sales are—Bristol and Exeter, New, 7—Great Western, New, 7—Midland ( Bristol and Glou cester), 49 1, 4—North British, 3 6 3 4—Ditto, Half Shares, 16— Ditto, Third Shares, 2T4 p.—North Staffordshire, 31. 13s, 9d, p.—Shrewsbury and Birmingham (A), WA—Ditto (B 1 p. LIVERPOOL, DECEMBER 18. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-Ambergato and East ern Junction, par-Birkenhead, Lancashire, and Cheshire, 1 1 / i p.-Birmingham and Oxford Junction, 8 p.-Boston, Stamford, and Birmingham, 'r4 p.-Dundee and Perth, New, 6 p.-East Lancashire, New (scrip), 283. 9d.-Edinburgh and Glasgow, 74-Glasgow and Dumfries, 1 1 4 p.-Glasgow, Paisley, and Greenock, Halves, 81 4-Leeds and Dewsbury, New Extensions (pink), 1 1 / 8 P.-Leeds and Thirsk, New, Preference, 1 p.-London and North-Western, New, Qiarters, (scrip),p.shrewsb,ry 12' p.-London and Direct Northe in , 1 ,6 dis.-Ma nc h es t er and Leeds, Fifths, p.-Manch es t er and Southampton l% . 3v s IL -North Staffo r d s hi re, 3 % p.-North-Western, dis.-Midland, 401 . Shares, 7% p.-North British, Thirds and Herefordshire, dis.-Shrewsbury, Oswestrv, and Chester, 11/8 dis.-Ditto, New, 1 / 6 dis - 1 L 1 ,4 p.-South-Eastern and Dover, 3814-Ditto, Shrewsbury and Birmingham (A), 2 1 / 8 p.-Ditto, 91. 124. 3d. SharesNe No. )4, West Ridin g U n i on, 1 % p.-York and Newcastle, Preference, 5 p.-York and N or th Midl an d (East and West Riding B 7(4 p- Extension), 114 p.-Ditto, Preference, 10% p.-Be Ballymena, p.-Belfast and Ball 6 3 / dis.-Dublin and Drog heda, ,4 18 1 dis.-Newry and Warrenpoint, p.-Dutch Rhenish, 1 1 ,4 dis. BLANCHESTER, DECEMBER 18. STOCK EXCHANGE. -The sales are -A m b ergate, Notting ham, and Boston, IA dis.-Birk en h ea d , L ancashire, and Cheshire Junction, 1 3-16 c. p.- Bi rm i ng h am and Oxfoi d E jn a n st e er ti r D 7 3 C ' Junction, and Bolton, p.-Blackburn, Clith eroe , 11 , 1 dis.-Black burn,lk p.-Di rect N orthern, 1/2 dis.- Counties, 23-East Lan cas hi re, New (scrip), 1 7-16 p.-Fleetwood, Preston, and West Riding, 1 4 dis -Glasgow and Dumfries, 1 3 4 c. p.-Great Grimsby and Sheffield, 3:y i c. dis.-Huddersfield and Manchester Ri , ilway and Canal, p.-Leeds and Thirsk, New, :)1 dis c. a.-Ditto, Pre ferential, 1 1 / 8 p. - London and South-Western (scrip), 73 p.-Manchester and Leeds Extension, 1 3 16 p.-North -O Bri tish Extension, 1 p. - Ditto, Thirds, 3 1 A p.-North Stafford shire, p.-North-Western, %p. ldham Alliance, %c. p.-Sheffield and Manchester, Quarters, No. 3, 3 1 / 2 p.- Shrawsbury and Birmingham (A), 214 p.-South-Eastern and Dover, No. 4, % c. p.-West Riding Union, 1% p.- York and North Midland, 10 1 4 p. LEEDS, DECEMBER 18. STOCK EXCHANGE.-The sales are-East Lancashire, New, 3 1 ,4 p.-Ditto, New Scrip, 1% p.-East Lincolnshire, 12s. &I. p.-Glasgow and Dumfries, 1% p.-Huddersfield and Manchester, 31. 19s. p.-Leeds and Bradford, 45 p.-Leeds and Dewsbury, 10 1 4 c. p. c. n.- Ditto, Half Shares, 51 p. c. n.-Ditto, Branches scrip (blue), 3 p.-Ditto, Exten sioas scrip (green), Ij s p.-Leeds and Thirsk, 2 c. dis.- Ditto, New, 1 dis. c. n.- Ditto, Preference, 21s. p.-Man cheater and Leeds, Half Shares (late Huddersfield and Shef field), 4 1 % p.-North British, Thirds ' 3 p.-Ditto, Q uar t ers (late Carlisle Branch), 2% p.-Ditt o , Extension (scrip), 20s. 6d. p.-North Staffordshire, 3 1 ,4 n. p.-North-Western, 10s. p.-Sheffield, Rotherham, and Goole, 19s. p.-Wharfdale Junction, 7s. c. dis.-York and North Midland Extension, 18 1 4 p.-Ambergate, Nottingham, and Boston, 2s. 6d. dis.- Leeds, Wakefield, and Midland, 11s. 6d. dis.-Liverpool, Manchester, and Newcastle Junction, 3s. 6d. dis.-London and York, ss. n. dis.--Northern Counties Union, 1 1 4 dis.- Shropshire Union, 53. dis. HULL, DECEMBER 18. STOCK EXCHANGE.-Our market to-day has not been quite so active as yesterday, and North British stock declined slightly. Our other quotations remain almost without alter ation. The sales are -Hull and Selby, Halves, 52% North British, Quarters, 78 5.-Ditto, Thirds, 21. 18s. 6d.-York and and West Ridi ng , Newcastle, P re f erence, 5 p.-York and North Midland, East 1 7 1 / 2 -Ambergate, Nottingham, and Bos ton, 3s. dis.-Ely and Huntington, 13 1 / 2 . STOCK EXCIS IA II N E GE F . F3E rh L e D, sDalEecszsairnetßEßliBrm. ingham and Oxford, 7 5 / 8 p.-East Lancashire, New, No. 2 (late Orms kirk), 3 1 / 2 P.-North British, Thirds, 565. p.-Sheffield, Rotherham, and Goole, 17s. c. p.-South Yorkshire, Don caster, and Goole, par. YORK, DECEMBER 18. STOCK EXCHANGE. -The sales are-Ipswich and Bury, 10 1 / 2 -London and York, 2/. 4s. 6d.-Newcastle and Ber wick, 34%-North British, Halves, 16-Ditto, Thirds, 3/ 195.-Ditto, Quarters,3/. 172.-llitto, Extension, I/. 133. 6d. -North-Western, 31 . 33.-Sheffield, Rotherham, &c . 3 1 4- York and Newcastle, Preference, 7-York and North Mid land, Preference, 123/ 8. This is an outline of the defendant's case, to which the defendant pleaded the general issue, and that he was not indebted. A great number of witnesses were called in proof of these facts, and to show that the charges were fair and reasonable. The majority of them, however, stated that the transaction was of such an extraordinary character, and so much out of the usual nature of Customhouse business, that they could not give a definite opinion as to the charges. Mr. Sergeant CHANNEL, OR behalf of the defendant, said his client had no pecuniary interest in the present action ; but he had a duty to perform, as the only acting English executor of the deceased, Mr. Dunn. That duty prompted him to resist the claim, which he con sidered exorbitant a.:l‘l uncalled for. With regard to the brokerage, he maintained that the plaintiff had done little or nothing to effect the passage of the goods through the Custom-houso, but that it was mainly done through Mr. Langdon, the curator of the exhibition, assisted by Mr. Gurney. At the outside, all that Mr. Hall cs.uld cl_ im was the ordinary Custom-house agent fees, not the extraordinary charge he had made. On the matter of the commission charged on the bonds executed as security to the Treasury for the re-delivery of the goods, he submitted that the sum of 5001 was monstrous. lie would say nothing of the commission on the first bond, which was 1001., but he protested• altogether agsinst the four subsequent commissions. The renewal of the bonds followPd as a matter of course, and the first commission, he contended, extended over the whole period the security was given, the bonds being treated as one continuous security. This was the usual course of Custom-house business, the only charge beyond the first commission being some fees to the cflicers fur the preparation of the renewed bonds. The Learned Gentleman also objected to several other items claimed, which, he stated, were paid in the lifetime of Mr. Dunn. The jury, hav ing retired a short time, gave a verdic for the plaintitT—Damages 991. ss. COURT OF BANKRUPTCY, Dec. 19. IN RE JOB ELLIOTT. This bankrupt, who had carried on business as a ship smith, in Beer-lane, Tower street, City, came up for his certificate. The bankrupt passed his last examination about twelve months since, when the Learned Commissioner with • drew the protection, and gave him very little hope of ever obtaining his certificate, on the ground that he had made an assignment of his property, to the preju dice of his creditors, and that he had not kept a cash account. A great many witnesses were then examined, and the corroborative points spoken to by the Learned Counsel were established, but the details would occupy several Mr. DUNCAN now appeared on behalf ei the bankrupt. He said he did not attempt to exculpate him, but to ex tenuate. The Learned Gentleman here stated several circumstances calculated to extenuate the bankrupt's conduct. The L?arned COMMISSIONER, in giving judgment, said that he wished it to be undentoood that in all cases where there was a preference given to one creditor, or where books were not kept, he would always ma. k them with severe censure. Under all the circumstances, he would suspend the certificate for six months, without protection. SHERIFFS' COM?T, Dec. 19. BOLTON V. LOVF.JOY. , [ADVERTISEMENT.]--A CURE OF A BAD FOOT AND ANKLE BY HOLLOWAY'S OINTMENT AND PlLLS.—Extract of a letter from N'ssall, New P rov i dence, date d A ugus t 11, 1346. „ To Professor Hollow ay —Sir, It gives rue mach pleasure in adding my testimony to the many who have been cured by Your ia"ltiabl' Pills and Ointment. F or a long time I suffered with a diseased which at last g o t so bad as to spread all over the foot. I applied a great many remedies, but I never found any relief until I used yours, which soundly healed it in a short period. I am now as well as ever. (Signed) Sold by all druggist s , and at Professor Holloway's Establishment, 224, Strand, London. "J. F. ATTENBURROW, Veterinary Surgeon." This was an action to recover the sum of 7/. 104. for goo.ls sold. The plaintiff is a zinc merchant, at Ham mersmith, and the defendant, is a smith, at Turnham green. - Mr. Rubinson appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Timms for the defendant, who pleaded that he was not indebted. It appeared by the evidence of a Mr. William Bolton, who is no relation, but a neighbour to plaintiff, that he was present when the goods were ordered, and that he delivered them, and afterwards demanded the money. and promised to pay. The witness was cross-examined, with a view of eliciting that the business belonged to the defendant's uncle. The witness said, he could swear it did not, for he (witness) had carried on business in the same shop, and when he took the Ship public-house, he let the shop to defendant. Another Witness was called who was in the habit of making up the books of the de fendant and the last witness, and knew that there were no one else in the business besides defendant. The Courner of Lyons of Monday states that There was a heavy fall of snow in the prece di ng n i g ht, w hi c h froze and became so s li ppery that severa l persons f e ll an d had broken limbs. BRIGHTON COLLEGE.—The New College at Brigh ton is to be publicly opened by the Bishop of Chichester, the Patron, and the Earl of Chichester, the President, on Tuesday, Jan. 26. The Rev. Arthur John Macleane, B.A , cf Trinity College, Cambridge, has been appointed Principal of the New College, and the Vice-Principalship with the Theological Tutorship. has been conferred on the Rev. Henry Cotterill, M.A., late Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. THE SU-g3 LONLION, MONDAY MORNINcI, DECEMBER 21 1 H 46. columns. Ann Humphreys, the principal witness, was examined by Mr. Mass.—She thus described the murder —Raine dot his arm round m 3 3 7- wai;: s and said, " We'll away, and have a walk ju s t as f ar as t h e b r id ge ." We went as far as the bridge, all of us. Catherine Raine and Joseph Yates went first, then me and Raine, and then Breckon and Barker. Yates and Catherine Raine were both very much in liquor. I can't say how the prisoners were in Raine said, " We'll go over the bridge," and we went down the sills. I know the tram-wall. We had not got down the flags when Raine said to me that " Yates had some money—how must they do to get it from him?" Yates and Catherine Raine were then going down the sills also. I said, " Poor little fellow, don't meddle of him—he will spend it among you." We went a little further down the sills, and then Barker came in front of us, and he said, " Noow, Jos, does thou intend to go to York against me for that coat?" Yates said, " He could do no other than go agoinst him." Barker said, "He should never have the chance of it." He said no more till we got to the end of the tram-wall, e.nd then Barker asked Yates for money. Yatea said he would not give them a half penny, but he was willing to spend it amongst them. He then asked him again if he was going to York against him, and Yates said he could do no other than Ko against him. BArker said, " Then you -, you shall never have the chance." Yates cried out, " Don't knock my eyes out." Raine and Breckon then went up, and there were heavy blows struck, but I don't know which of them struck those blows. Yates then cried out 6' murder," and Catherine shrieked out too ; and Barker turned 'to us and said, if we did shout out again, ho would throw us into the water. I did not cry out. Catherine and I were standing together, up against the wall. We had got past the flsgs then. Yates cried out, " Oh dear, oh dear, is there no one to help me ?" I knew Yates before. He wai like a woman shouting out more than a man. Barker said, " Yes, he could help him." Then they all three came a little distance from him, and Raine reckoned some money over and said there Was 10s. BANK RETURNS. • (From the London Gazette of Tuesday.) kn Account, pursuant to the Act seventh and eighth Victoria, cap. 32, of the Average Amount of Bank Notes, of the several Banks of Issue in England and Wales, in Circulation during the Week ending Satur day, the sth day of Dac., 1846 : Average PRIVATE BANKS. Amount. Abingdon Bald:, Abingdon—Knapp and Co.. 24,112 Andover Bank, Andover—Heath and Co 14.433 Ashford Bank, Ashford—Jemmitt and Pomfret 10,953 Aylshuol Bank, Aylsham—R. and E. Copeman 5,440 Aylesbury Old Bank, kylesbury—Rickford and !Lunt Bablock Bank and Baldock and Biggleswade I;aric, 7. l aldock—Wells. 1 1 .! - .,crg, end Lindsell... 35,119 I 3 n dapie Bank, Barnstaple-:D:alte and Co. 12.1157 Basingstoke and Odiham Bank, Basingstoke— Cole. Seymour, aryl tte.l(oid Bank, Bedford—T. Barnard liedford and Bedfordshire Bank, Bedford— 'f't app, Halfhead, and Co. Bewilley Bank, Bewdley—Nichols, Baker, and Crane 3icestet and Oxfordshire Bank and Oxford Bank, Bicester—Tubb, Wootten, and Co. ;:zirnitrigham Bank, Birmingham—Attwoods, Spooner, and Co 23,076 Birmingham and Warwickshire Bank, Birming ham—Lewis, Moilliett, and Co . 16.635 Bland ford Bank, Blandford—Bastard and Oak. 7,384 Boston Bank, Boston—Garfit and Co 67,164 Boston Bank, Boston—Gee and Co 13,227 Bridg .v.iter Bank, Bridgwater—E. &J. Sealey 8,664 Bristol Bank, Bristol—Miles, llarford, and Co. 38,913 Broscie . , and Bridgnorth, and Bridgnorth and 13roseley Bank, Broseley—Messrs. Pritchard 24,546 Buckingham Bank, Buckingham —Bartlett, Parrott, and Co. Bury and Suffolk Bank, Sudbury Bank, Market Bank, Bury—Oakes, Bevan, and Co.. Bant . ury Bank, Banbury—Gillett and Taavney. Banbury Old Bank, Banbury—Messrs. Cobb City Bank, Bath—Moger and Son Bedfordshire Leighton Buzzard Bank, Leighton Buzzard—Bassett and Grant 1 3irmingham Bank, Birmingham—Taylor and Lloyds Bradford Old Bank, Bradford, Yorkshire—H. and A. Harris ... Brecon Old Bank, BreCon—Wilkins and C 0... Bridport Bank, Bridport—S. and W. E. Gundry Brighton Union Bank, Brighton—Hall, West, and Borrer Burlington and Driffield Bank, Burlington— Harding, Smith, and Co Bury St. Edmunds Bank, Bury St. Edmunds— d. and Co. Bromsgrove Bank and Stourbridge and Broms grove Bank, Bromsgrove—Rufford, Biggs, and Co. 'Cambridge Bank, Cambridge—Mortlock and Sons Cambridge and Cambridgeshire Bank, Cam bridge—Messrs. Forsters Canterbury Bank, Canterbury—Hammond and Co Carmarthen Bank, Carmarthen—Morris and Sons Chertsey Bank, Chertsey—Messrs. La Coste Colchester Bank, Colchester—Round, Green, and Co. Colchester and Essex Bank, Witham and Essex Bank, and Hadleigh Bank, Suffolk, Colchester —Mills, Bawtree, and Co Cornish Bank, Truro—Tweedy and Co Coventry Bank, Coventry—Little and Wood cock City Bank, Exeter—Milford and Co Craven Bank, Settle—Birkbecks and Co. Christchurch Bank, Christchurch—Tice, Welsh, and Co Cardiff Bank, Cardiff—Towgood and Co Chepstow Old Bank, Chepstow Bank, Mon mouth Old Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Chepstow—Bromage, Snead, and Co. Derby Bank, Derby—Messrs. Evans Derby Bank, Derby—S m ith an d C o . Derby Old Bank and Scarsdale and High Peak Bank, Derby—Crompton, Newton, and Co 26,067 Devizes and Wiltshire Bank, Devizes—Hughes, Locke, and Co 19,391 Diss Bank, Diss—Oakes, Fincham, and Co 10,548 Doncaster Bank, Doncaster—Leathaw, Tew, and Co. 12,271 Doncaster Bank and Retford Bank, Doncaster— Cook and Co. Dover Union Bank, Dover—Latham, and Co — Darlington Bank, Durham Bank, and Stockton- on-Tees Bank, Darlington—Backhouse, and Co 82,626 I)cvonport Bank, I)evonport—Hodge and Nor- 8,117 79,993 50,655 46,826 3,300 35,118 37,206 12,098 66,770 22,895 31,940 12,623 3,134 16,738 22,485 48,591 32,733 22,364 3,255 21,114 40,099 49,360 7,749 19,036 72,126 2,650 6,838 man Dorchester Old Bank and Dorsetshire Bank, Dorchester-Williams and Co. East Cornwall Bank, Liskeard-Robins, Foster, and Co. 107,835 East Riding Bank, Beverley-Bower, Hutton, and Co. . 51,839 Essex Bank and Bishops Stortford Bank, Chelmsford-Walford. and Co Exeter Bank, Exeter-Sanders/ and Co 28,977 Falcenham Bank, Fakenham-Gurneys, Birk beck, and Co. Farringdon Bank and Bank of Wanta.ge, Far ringdon-Barnes and Medley 8,258 Farnham Bank, Farnham-Messrs. Knight...- 12,563 Faversham Bank, Faversham-Hilton and Co 5,985 Godalming Bank, Godalming-Mellersh and Keen Grantham Bank, Grantham-Kewney and King 18,081 Guildford Bank, Guildford-Messrs. Haydon... 13,357 Grantham Bank, Grantham-Hardy and C 0.... 29,574 Hastings Old Bank, Hastings-Smith, Hilder, and Co. 36,094 Hereford City and County Bank, Hereford- Matthews and Co. Hertfordshire Bank and Ware Bank, Ware s. Adams and Co. Hull Bank and Kingston-upon-Hull Bank, Hull - Smith, Brothers, and Co. Huntingdon Town and County Bank, Hunting don-Rust and Veasey Harwich Bank, Harwich-Cox,Cobbold, and Co 5,355 Iletnel Hempstead Bank, Hemel Hempstead- Smith, and Whittingstall 23,920 Iloniton Bank, Honiton -Flood and Co. 14,615 Hertfordshire, Hi tchen Bank, Hitchen-Sharples and Co. 38,578 Ileroford Ross, and Archenfield Bank, and Ross and A_rchenfield Bank, Hereford-Morgan, lfoskins, and Co 24,541 fpswich Bank, Ipswich-Bacon and Co. rpqaieh and Needham Market Bank, Suffolk, fladleigh Bank, Manningtree and Mistley Bank, and Woodbridge Bank, Ipswich- Alexanders au 3 Co. centish Bank, Maidstone-Mercer, Randall, and Mercer Kingto3 and Radnorshire Bank, Kington-J Davies and Co 23,861 Knighton Bank, Knighton-4. Davies and Co 7,087 Knaresborough Old Bank and Ripon Old Bank, lintresborough-Terry and Co 18,926 Kendal Bank, Kendal-Wakefield, Crewdson, and Co. Kettering Bank, Kettering-botch and Sons 9,020 Lane End Staffordshire Bank, Lane End-C llarv.y and Son Leeds Bank, Leed s -B ec k ett an d C o .51,101 heeds 'Union Bank, Leeds-W. Williams, Brown, and C.). Leek and Staffordshire Bank, and Leek and Congleton Bank,Leek-Fowler, Gaunt, and Co. 1,177 Lentester Bank, Leicester-Pagets and Kirby 28,779 Lewes Old Bank, Lewes-Molineux and Co 39,450 Lichfield Bank, Lichfield-Palmer and Green 16,685 Lincoln Bank, Lincoln-Smith and Co 88,093 Usbniovery Bank and Llandilo Bank, Llando very-David Jones and Co. ou'.hborough Bank, Loughborough-Middle t..ns and Cradock Lymington Bank, Lymington-C. and S. St. Bathe Lynn Regis and Lincolnshire Bank, Lynn Regis -Gurneys and Co. 41,003 Lynn Regis and Norfolk Bank, Lynn Regis- Massey and Co. Macclesfield Bank, Macclesfield-Brocklehurst and Co 13,088 \{anningtree Bank,Manningtree-Nunn and Co 6,727 Marlborough Bank, Marlborough and Wilts Old Bank, Marlborough Old Bank, Marl borouo.h Old Bank and Hungerford Bank, and Hungerford Bank, Marlborough-Tanner and Pinckney 14,153 Marlborough and North Wiltshire New Bank, Marlborough-Ward, Merriman, and Hillier 11,457 Merionethshire Bank, Dolgelly-Jones and Williams Miners' Bank, Truro-Willyums and Co 17,318 Monmouthshire Agricultural and Commercial Bank, Abergavenny-Baileys and C 0........,, 26,748 Monmouth Old Bank, Monmouth Bank, Brecon Bank, Chepstow Bank, Chepstow Old Bank, and Ross and Herefordshire Bank, Monmouth -Bromage and Snead 15,295 Monmouthshire Newport Old Bank, Newport -W. Williams and 50n5..... Newark Bank, Newark-Godfreys and Hutton 27,652 Newark and Sleaford Bank, and Sleaford and Newark Bank, Newark-Handley, Peacock, and Co .................................. 48,641 Newbury Bank, Newbury-Bunny and Slocock. 32,763 Newmarket Bank, Newmarket -Eaton, Ham mond, and Son 19,080 Norfolk and Suffolk Bank, Diss-Taylor and Dyson 3,099 Norwich Crown Bank, Norwich-Harveys and Iludsons Norwich and N or f o lk Bank, Norwich-Gur- 46,060 neys rnd Co ............... 70,439 Notiingham and Nottinghamshire Bank, Not tingham-Hart, Fellows, and Co 10,538 Nuneaton Bank, Nuneaton-Craddcock and Co Naval Bank, Plymouth-Harris, Mudge, and Co 23,405 New rrum Bank, Sarum-Hetley, Everett, and Co Nottingham Bank, Nottingham-Smith and Co 29,141 Osuestry Bank and Oswestry Old Bank, Os westry-Croxon and Co 16,963 Oxford Bank, Oxford-J. and R. Morrell 1 2 ,663 xford Old Bank, Oxford-Rubinson, Parsons, and Thompson... '.)lf.! Bank Tunbridge, Tonbridge and Tonbridge VV Tonbridge and Tonbridge Wells and SeveLeaks hank, Tonbridge- Beeching and Syns ,.......... 10.548 9,139 6,888 5,145 Average .4. , noun Oxfordshire Witney Balk Witney—Williams, Clinch, and Co Pease's Old Bank, Hull, the Hull Old Bank and Beverley Bank, Hull—Pease and Co Penzance Bank, Penzance—Batten and Co ?eterborough Bank and Oundle Bank, Peter borough—Messrs. Yorke Peterborough Bunk, Peterborough—Simpson, White, and Simpson P , :_:e.brokeshire Bank, Haverford w est—J. and W. Walters Penzance Union Bank, Falmouth Bank, and Truro Bank, Penzance—Rickets, Enthoven, and Co Reading Bank, Reading--Simonds and Co Reading Bank, Reading—Stephens,Blandy, and Co The:imond Bank,Richmond—Stapleton arid C 0... Ringwood and Poole Bank, and Town and County of Poole Bank, Ringwood—Ledgard awl Sons Rochdale Bank, Rochdale—Clement, Royds, and Co Rochester, Chatham, and Strood Bank, Roches bur—Day and Nicholson Romsey and Hampshire Bank, Romsey—Foot ner and Son Royston Bank, Royston—Fordhm and Sons Rugby Bank. Rughy—Butlin and Son Rye Bank, Rye—Curteis, Pomfret, and Co Reigate and narking Bank, and Reigate, Croy don, and narking Bank, Reigate—Nash and Co 10,293 45,289 10,695 8,548 8,40 10,125 12,654 11,932 36,004 3°,541 6,609 9,732 4,305 9,808 16,233 12.644 22,280 13,270 Ross (ild Bank, Herefordshire, Ross—Pritchard and Allaw ay Saffron Walden and North Essex Bank, Saffron Walden—Messrs. Gibson Salop Bank, Shrewsbury—Burton, Lloyd, and Co.. Scarb rough Old Bank, Scarborough—Woodall ant Co Shrewsbury and Marko Drayton Bank, Shrews bury—Adams, Adan.s, and Co Shrewsbury Old Bank, and Shrewsbury and Ludlow Bank, Shr. wsbury - - Rocke, Ey tons, and Co Sittingbourne an.l Milton Bank, Sittingbourne —Valiance and Son Southampton Town and County Bank, South ampton—Maddicon and Son Southwell Bank, Southwell—Wylde and Co St. Alban's Banlc, St. Alban's—J. S. Story Salisbury Bank, Salisbury—Messrs. Brodie Shaftesbury Bank, Shaftesbury— Brodie and King Southampton and Hampshire . Bank, Southamp ton—Atherly and Fall Stone Bank, Stone—W. Moore Stourbridge Ban c, Stourbridge —Rufford, Wragg, and Co Stafford Old Bank, titafford—Stevenson and Co Stamford and Rutland Bank, Stamford—Eaton, Cayley, and Co. . Stourbridge Old Bank Stourbridge—Bate and Robins Shrewsbury and Welstipool Bank, Shrewsbury —Beck, Downward, and Co. St. Alban's and Herts Bank, St. Alban's—Gib son and Stuart Taunton Bank, Taunton—Messrs. Badcock Tavistock Bank, Tavirtock—Gill, Rundle, and Co. Thornbury Bank, Thornbury—Rolph, Yates, and Parslow Tiverton and Devonshire Bank, Tiverton—Duns ford and Barne Thrapston and Kettering Bank, Northampton shire, Thrapston—Yorke and Eland Tring Bank and Chesham Bank, Tring—But cher and Son Towcester Old Bank, Towcester—J. and S Percival Union Bank, Cornwall, Helston—Vivian and Co. Uxbridge Old Bank, Uxbridge—Hull, Smith, and Co. Wallingford Bank, Wallingford—Wells and Co. Warwick and Warwickshire Bank, Warwick— Kelynge, Greenway, and Co. Wellington Somerset Bank, Wellington—Fox, Brothers West Riding Bank, Wakefield, and Pontefract Bank, Wakefield—Lea,thana, Tew, and Co. Whitby Old Bank, Whitby—Simpson, Chap man, and Co 14,169 Winchester, Alresford, and Alton Bank, Win chester— Bulpett and Co. Winchester and Hampshire Bank, Winchester —Wickham and Co Weymouth Old Bank and Dorchester Bank, Weymouth—Elliott and Pearse Wirkesworth and Ashbourne Derbyshire Bank, Wirkesworth—Arkwright and Co. Wisbech and Lincolnshire Bank, Wisbech— Gurney and Co. Wiveliscombe Bank, Wiveliscombe—P. and W Hancock Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton—Good ricke and flolyoake. Worcester Bank, Worcester—Farley, Lavender, and Co. 13,268 Worcester Old Bank and Tewkesbury Old Bank, Worcester —Berwick, Lech mere, and Co 79,533 Worcestershire Bank, Kidderminster—Farley and Turner Whitby Bank, Whitby—Frankland and Wil kinson not reed. Walsall Old Bank, Walsall—Charles Foster and Sons Warminster and Wiltshire Bank, Warminster— Everett and Co. 45,519 17,140 24,700 37,614 15,305 13,357 2,788 21,808 16,439 12,594 29,235 18,075 24,406 2,155 29,088 11,619 11,254 11,200 12,894 16,177 21,466 9,506 25,758 5,949 21,403 Wrexham Bank, Wrexham—J. and S. Kenrick 2,215 Wolverhampton Bank, Wolverhampton— Messrs. Fryer Yarmouth and Suffolk Bank, and Halesworth and Suffolk Bank, Yarmouth—Gurney, Birkbelk, and Co. Yarmouth, Norfolk, and Suffolk Bank, Great Yarmouth—Sir E. K. Lacon, Bart., and Co 14,116 Yeovil Old Bank, Yeovil—E. and J. Batten York Bank. York—Swann, Clough, and Co 45,406 JOINT-STOCK BANKS. Bank of Westmoreland, Kendal Barnsley Banking Company, Barnsley Bradford Banking Company, Bradford 48,547 Bilston District Banking Company, Wolver hampton Bank of Whitehaven, Whitehaven Bradford Comm rcial Banking Company, Brad ford .... ... Burton. ULtc,xeter, and matiordabire Union Barking Con - pany, Burton-upon-Trent Chesterfield and North Derbyshire Banking Company, Chesterfield `„„. Cumberland Union Banking Company, Work ington . Cheltenham and Gloucestershire Banking Com pany, Cheltenham Coventry and Warwickshire Banking Company, Coventry 32,105 24 714 Coventry Union Banking Company, Coventry 14,970 County of Gloucester Banking Company, Chel tenham Carlisle and Cumberland Banking Company Carlisle 23,846 Carlisle City and District Bank, Carlisle 19,367 Dudley and West Bromwich Banking Company, Dudley 34,014 Derby and Derbyshire Banking Company, Derby 19,8 97 Darlington District Joint-Stock Banking Com pany, Darlington ............ East of England Bank, Norwich .............. 22,634 Gloucestershire Banking Company, Gloucester. 149,370 Halifax Joint-Stock Bank, Ha1ifax....,,,, 18,187 Huddersfield Banking Company, Huddersfield 33,297 Hull Banking Company, Hill . ................ 26,450 Halifax Commercial Banking Company, Halifax 12,367 Halifax and Huddersfield Union Banking Com pany, Halifax ................. 38,600 Helston Banking Company, Helston ............... 1,350 Herefordshire Banking Company, H ere f ord 23,308 Knaresborough and Claro Banking Company, Knaresborough Kingsbridire Joint-Stock Bank, Kingsbridge 3,245 Lancaster Banking Company, Lancaster 58,853 Leeds Banking Company, Leeds Leicestershire Banking Company, Leicester Lincoln and Lindsey Banking Company, Lincoln 51,726 Leamingtol Priors and Warwickshire Banking Company, Leamington Priors Leeds and West Ridine , Banking Company, Leeds 405 Leeds. Commercial Banking Company, Leeds... 1,607 Ludlow and Tenbury Bank, Ludlow 8,526 Moore and Robinson's Nottinghamshire Bank ing Company, Nottingham 29,929 Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Banking Company, Nottingham Newcastle, Shields, and Sunderland Union Joint- Stock Banking Company, Newcastle 77,202 National Provincial Bank of England, Birming ham, Head-office, 112, Bishopsgate-st ree t, London North Wilt!, Banking Company, Melksharn 56,398 Northamptonishire Union Bank, Northampton 79,287 Northarnptunahire Banking Company, North- ampton v North and South Wales Bank, Liverpool 54,665 Pares's Leic2stt rshire Banking Company, Lei cester Saddleworth Banking Company, Saddleworth 2,432 Sheffield Bankiitg Company, Sheffield 35,772 Stamford, Spalding, and Boston Banking Com pany, Starmbrd Stuckey's Banking Company, Bristol Somerset shire Bank, and Somersetshire Bank, Lang port Shropshire Banking Company, Shiffnall Stourbridge and Kidderminster Banking Corn pany, Stourbridge Sheffield and hilL..mshire Banking Company, Sheffield . Sheffield and Rotherham Joint-Stock Banking Company, Swaledale and Wenileydale Banking Company, Richmond,.~,,,, Stockton and Durham County Banking Com pany, 5t0ckt0n.,..... Storey and Thomas's Banking Company, Shaftesbury Sheffield and Retferd Bank, Sheffield ... Suffolk Banking Company, Ipswich Wolverhampton ai 1.1 Staffordshire Banking Com pany, Wolverhampton 35,166 Wakefield and B arns l ey Union Bank, Wakefield 12,915 Whitehaven Joint Stock Banking Company, Whitehaven . Warwick and Le,, nit gton Banking Company, Leamingt e n, West of Englane awl South Wales District Baukßristol. ........ 79,128 9,801 600 4,134 Wilts and Dorset Banking Con pan) , Salit y m er r i y ge .4614 West Riding Union Banking ..":ompany, Mid. dersfield Whitchurch and Ellesmere Banking ComPanY , 6 021 Whitchurch ...................................... Worcester City and County Banking Compaq , 6, 70 Worcester.... .. .... . . ............•• 27 York Union Banking Company, York ............ F.:641 York City and County Banking Company, York n . 9 19 Yorkshire Banking Company, Leeds ............ 117_ P. DEANS, Registrar of Bank Beturn'. Stamps and Taxes, re ember 12, 1846. ~.......___-_,_,..... MARKE T N E WS.—(SATURDAY') COVENT-GARDE N. i l , . per Pines, 6s to 8s • Hot-house Grapes, 4s to 63 per n ', igs sert Apples, 3s 6cito 83; Culinary Apples, 2s to 4s i pears. to 16s per half-sieve; Oranges, 14s to 183 per 100; Fab . 85s to 90s; and Cob Nuts, 95s to 1003 per 8310011)3; Cab .... 9d to Is; Red ditto, 2s to 3s ; Brtcoli, to 14s per doSt Artichokes, 3s to 6s ; and Jerusalem ditto, Is to 2s PerA i n g sieve; Carrots, 4s to 6s; and Turnips, 2s 6d t o g p 1.00nc4 dozen bunches; Sea-kail, 3s to 35 6d per punnet; Mush Is to is 6d per pottle. Huwazuronv. sale - to-0 Full average supplies of most article s were o rates. Generally speaking, the demand was heavy, at late NEWGATE AND IMADENIII'I' thie t m ra o d rn e i w ng as ; N y .e e r t ) , , i i n w a l e n t g ive to :_ ll2 B e eef e , h f a ro n There era; a most excellent display of Meat here ,„ od th ; i l l u a d l: ton 3s 8d to 4s 8d; Veal, 3s 6d to 4s 8 , 1; and 7i to 4s 10d per Sibs by the carcase. Turkeys. , 5 frbbit e, Geese, 4s to 7s ; Ducks, is 61 to 2s 6d; Tam 1 0 10 d Is to 2s; Wild ditto, 104 to is 2d; Pig e°ll9 ' - 6,1 to 6 3 ; each ; Surrey Fowls, 6s to 9s; ditto Chickens, 4 5 f o r and Barn-door Fowls, 2s 94 to 5s 6d per couple. Egg s ' , l b; i g u e 2s in Bd t t h o e3:el lish, 13s to 17s per 100; Fresh Butter, is to Is 1 per 49; D P ls t u a B c r d: , t i g o Pheasants, 2s to 4s ; Partridges, is to 2s; Hare s ) s Gro ase, l a s n 2; 9; 1 s d s 2 t d noi t. p o 2e 8 1; 4 16s t d 1 ; t; 0 11 w2 ' o s oi; Widgeon., g co c e o Teal,kri 3 : 6 1 g s d : dttoiiiol44sll;B j; Wild Plovers. is to is 3d each. ' NEWPORT. 45 8a i Beef from 2s 104 to 3s 8d ; Mutto n, 3s r Bl hs. Veal, 4s to 4s &I; and Pork, 3s 10 d t o 4s 10c1 pe BILLINGS GATE. 111 W Ag supply Most kinds of Fish, the - ' held at very high rates. WHITECEAPEZ. „ t 8 d . VIA 33 Beef, from 2s 10d to 3s 8d; Mutton , '5 ' 3s 8d to 4s Gd ; and Pork, 3s 8d tc 43 84 pe r 8119 5 . BREAD. Per 4lbs lo b 94 to 9 1 / 2 d ; of Household ditto, 7d to 8d The prices of Wheaten Bread in the metropolis 1141 5d V t d ; do. 721 b tt 801 b, 3d to lt, g d ; do-, B ,rt 1 041 N 7- 11 t. BIDE DIANSV I Litb 0 721b. thd Market Hides, 561 b to 641 b, 3d per lb ; d°,1,1 - 0 881 6, 4d 3i ' to to . 4 3 d ; do. 881 b to 961 b, 4 1 / 2 d . , 1 - • d 9 """ -° 13; .° ed a S n h d ee p p, o 4 w s ns 4 , d 2 t a o 8 5 d s t 6 o d 3 ; s Kent 6d. and 6d ; Calf Skins, each. s 6ti to to 6s 5671; Hoo.rni--11i,desi; to 31 9d; SawrxFutLl3.-1117. -a do ir w }Ts!. fialf.breuso Si 8s to Si ; and Straw, 11 8e to 1112 s Pe r '- average supply, and a sluggish d d Clove r entail - 4 1 ; loo' CUMBF . . .11LAND. —Meadow Hay, 21 83 t° P e ditto, 3/ 8s to 4/ 18s; andS 8s tu 11136 r Straw, 11 . Clo ver Supply but moderate, and trade rather dull' 411 olds WHITECIIAPEL.—Meadow Hay, 2/ 5s to „ 4 . I ditto, 3/ 5 - - 's to Si 3 s ; and Straw, I/ 8s to 11123„v -312715frtioN1 ; inCarertftaljt°' Both Hay and Straw moved off slowly, at late rat WORKS by ROBERT .T. CITLVERWILL. 3 t -1 1.... - '11;0 • i g CP . One Shilling each. by post Ono aud gir.v.- - li in I , FP Infertile i ea.t i 8 ,ceMatches—Curiosities e.s _ c l 0 N SINGLE and—MAERIE (An Original Medical liistorPl , t gis co N TENTS : direction —Marital Anticipations Old R e alities — L a .!' t ° I it s :st un : e n 01 1 11; Analysis of the Affections—Kw* Conventions _ t rots _of Unions —lncongruous Alliances—Lam edic e Plw' 2. INCIEMENT6 11Inurnit:litelee—s oifhTe:emnetyn-athorfeeGeYsetaatirslz3lf;ull"6g::4° ,t 1 fa the body On CHASTITY and itsINFR " Of human fl A ls n an E d n i a r y ttil fo ti r es i Those taught by nature, and by art2 e 7 d , t eem Of griefs conceal'd, and disaPPlr re d A nd SO' Which young and gentle. them m. The lonely and the mated-- 31 ; ." •, , n, In kindly spirit, herein CO unsel's ii i ,..., to gala? How health, how hope, how baPP."' - 3. A AV °lll WHAT to EAT, DRINK, ar P laint , f e elloo With Diet Tables for all CoIIP . tr ootill ~.,* 0 0 184d6i2c0,17-7....", eirl. Contents :-How to ensure perfect dig , o estw n n ted rn ind 'i " fh , 111 good night's rest, a clear head, and a ,_.--nt, the fee ice.... ,o4 , servance of the instructions herein C0 11tal" est u o tion, 0 ;0 veusly delica e, even to the most shattered .___. e n d reach La the greatest amount of physical hapPulr"'" - w hat O ng ' full period of life allotted to man • hst drin k ' “ " How we should live-what eat . W ears a nd tell- o bit,- e , ThesTeoinrteearcehstiinnghleialtuteh,ful,ollatmlirese,escore ._ ....ming elnr! _ i mune very delicate import, as their titles alirn!Pli7rnmwiliattebe_rs et?gueriellYainvinirotteeni surable and general utility, for they tr'', but vnuch ioatu d throuP ture able ti understand ought to an °- ;ojity Pr nin °' these enlightened times. except terrible discotuit. questionab a hannels, is at a very -- i and ale' .. her awn pbY l 's f nature, cf human disappointmen.s - _,. his 0 , . upon that tai In the exposition hereby offered a t , r ;ger rdedlieentrUitiell contended that ever; roader shall tec n t "'c t 1 , hoisteu -.-- p the ..." 0 0 any more than their own lawyw. :'n'' _— orgit isation, to ol should know the simple principles of our ow. fin th ei `n e Ver ' t yiliO_A whereby our existence and the issue thereL, ~i. us OUr . _ s ub OW states depend, the duties that are e xp ected ''' mankind have tfter'"oitod happiness of the present and future race o f in faitan ni l pp a ha il ioo By such knowledge, and which is capacities in the family circle, and the terms on here . _ an .A health will be found to be in our own keeptup _,,, hi nim,w ment here' - 0 0 1 7 within the attainment of all; by the avail _,,„ o u r . ~ 1 our duty to ourselves, we secure the l ik e advantage:7:; se hical o sf to follow, and finally by the cultivation consistent with degenerate health, the mind as well as t he the i''' be exalted to the summit of perfection, as best becow. - op of God's creations. . his 1 o'r I . .fle.O rli j i b n y g s , and the i r perusal -his which the n e -it. . The author's justification for this seeming en. 0. ., ° ...- u t :11l of study feati o i d purpose, purge! guaranteemust ,: j t t 1 ''° ! 1 i t i FltopicseTeot. broached Fleet-stree t; f, ehta;dici f fa n n v sn o ha l ey v r e , w h r 1 1 3 s , -street; -r n o n w , ; 39 C , a r t ' iv „, nesar pllil l o j o t ) direct from the Author, 10, Argyle-place, Regent-street.„',..' 0_,..„,0° integrity Great Marlborough-street), who may be advised persen"".al' liw a w matters daily till Three, and in the Evenings from &a. - - ....Ses 11°v A POPULAR TREATISE on the HEALTH, LIFE. a n d 0- of the BODILY FUNCTIONS. oil S , NI.'"ETEETII EDITION, price 2s. 6d. ; Free 1 ).3' P as ' i foll‘ Envebapc) 3s. Cal., gi treats' O°V T HE SILENT FRIEND. fi A Med i ° neglecte:a_7ood p?A lion. powers, T o i n ie th b e at s f s ul of e t ff h e e cts rep o ro f d l u t ct l i u v l e geiic, with nle'snirictSreg'- li: condary Symptoms, &c., are fully pointed out. N IP , 11. IP' . gravings ; followed by observations on Marriage. '''." . 4 ,/,01: PERRY and Co., Consulting Surgeons, London. ) ,„,1 t the l i .s r I Tl n t i' l Published bj the Authors, and may be,.." - ,, -- „ 3 „ 146, ' -- , s . tP'" Sold by Strange, No. 21, Paternoster Tow; Gordon 146, co., °"' 0 street ; I'urkis, Compton-street. Soho ; Hannay a"... 8 obe c e street, and 37, Ro3 al Exchange , and all booksellers th f i o s rail Wo ng rk p reverted Ptrt I. from o f UM disqualifications, and will be( ound an avai s lS_Tl,d, , eltf,; ( the means of perfect and secret restoration W in nfraleSoo l ";:g Part 11. treats perspicuously upon those (OW i 7 fec tiOn' si d, CV in their primary or secondary state, arising fre wa des' ,A 0 ho .v numbers who neglect to obtain competent 1.. dir °Cl" bsf' upon themselves years of misery and suffering' , c lusive,,..l o o- 41 : 0 0. The CORDIAL BALM OF SYRIACUM is c- 'if w-- fid " - oat' aisMpaatrritinicounilaarilyAlaldiadlrleC7,e;te:°ll:S%festi,gri° . ~.,ulsr',l,,its. a ..r -- rtheei:4caeurisrsselsloiogfssfrnooefrvmao,puic a r n tee d a,l s i e ei fi xd u cit a es l sseti d s e o, b iia i , li ec t .o y n , si i ii r cisi : mou ; sl:; : o; :i anc .. s - , 3 3: : f r o r - - 01 lip: An O r tie. ti The Five-pound cases may be had B° . - E'S' .- ... bl o4 ' ,110' . .. The CONCENTRATED DETEBsli r r , ,,,,i n g LP' (ft al t . vet syphilitic remedy for searching out and Pa'4, - Dead , c pr e' oPel - lis nGreal contamination, scurvy, blotches en "- from ~.• ulcerations, and those painful affections aris i ng, the sssil• id. _, 44. /o r ment, secondarysyinptoms, and all eruptions° 26. Yu reg , '- and 335. per bottle. LS P ile° o° oo 14 PERRY'S PURIFYING SPECIFIC PIL- ' d Mr a h hoir and I Is. per box, are the most effectual reln . „ ° t i i r o a t --- o r flaramation, irritation of the bladder, B g , ' , ". le ° 006 Consultation fee, if by Letter, It. business. A minute st tbe ti o tit ' dets ll 1r re sl o d Sig i cessary. Messrs. Perry are in daily attendan ee e wen 19, Berners-street, Oxford-street, L on don, froth 10, five till ei g ht ; an d on Sundays from eleven tin i" so ~, ' Tryii ,o— . ON THE SECRET INFIR MI TIES ~.. •13* prO o ill ) a. MATURITY. ...,;(10.- sielOrl, WITH TWENTY-FIVE COLOURED .'',,s er",,e $ Just published, Twentieth Thousand, In a rti ii p.— d if 2s. 64. Jr post paid, to any address, for 3s . °'''' Trei' te ilf direct 11 om the Author's residence. M ealia VO,Ol SELF. PRESERVATION: A llt sfid I YO.- hhe o re, 1,,, on the Secret Infirmities and Disorders ° n o i" aye ~,f l ll ' Illuerated with Twenty-flee Coloured Plates L r oue ,, ,,"d /DWI Physiology, and Diseases of the Urinary and,.!„,ljoin4l-111°_,010° explaining their various structures, uses, and i" .- b5191..' I: 0 0 0 the injuries that are produced in them, by solltarY. o ent °, l excesses. With Practical Observations on the Tre' o dic ( Debility, Local and C ons tit ut i onal Weakne ss, And ' the Urethra. svitaS°o,oo By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONSULTING don; Milts 9, Bedford-street, Bedford-square , If in n burk i be ce Matriculated Member of the University of _, E "rity a" Member of the London Hospital Medical zw - - ' o r i l Apothecaries' Hall, London, &c., &c. dr fli n I ,4 CONTENTS OF THE TREATISIL:,+h 11$ tfOft,tl CHAPTER I . On the Philosophy of Marriage , "'„,; c ove m pari c ost ands) bligatiens, and on Infelicitous and VriP ru f the obi poS* CHAPTER 2. On the Anatomyand Physiology 0 l ing ..10 0 1 .pro te/ Organs, their flinctions, structures, and secretions, 0 1,0 , 0 no. Mental and Physical Power are dependant unnni h n e s Oaf fill/ ie i , —CHAPTER 3. On Solitary Habits; their "s l "`. ° , of 0 2;00 00 7 Animal Economy; the concealed cause of DebiL,.. , wes ) l'of o ipda,., of the Stomach, Lungs, and Brain and gan a " .- ,,wrda, ri if 4 P Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On ' the Secret ."-- o cja I 'roil , L p i l o t and Maturity, and the Treatment of Nervous and b Mental Debility, and Premature Decay.—cnirr ai ra a ° the Dlsorderr arising f rom indiscnminate El c ,,. - ' .011: Gleet, Strictures, a n d o th er Di seases of the Urethra' of s' 0 5 leg 00100 REVIEWS ON THE WORE. 0 $ pc k " The author of this singular and talented wor k considerable el 1011 1 , 6 101, fled medical man, who has evidently had m he Agiri3OP the trr stment of the various disorders arising fre lp ,010 1 :31/ 0 00/ frailties of early indiscretion. The engravings are ,sses , ,,"lo ..o 0 dition, by demonstrating the consequences a "'"- diV E 1 '`. . act as a salutary warning to youth and maturity , I n o ttat' o r many questions may be satisfactorily replied to, th at Ae ice; OZ . peal, evea to the most confidential friend." — E"; ho rest art - (I C° l 4 ' Published by the Author, and may be had a'„.:,,nsf,;:l si , 00 1 from Kent and Richard .;, 52, Paternoster-row , .' -I-.,""i ; Li _A Oxford-street, Starie, Tichborne-street, Quadrant: ,r- Leadenhall-street, London ; Newton, IC, Churn n--- Sla t l oolai ewes and by all Booksellers. i in .• „ c on... n jOr At Home for Consultation daily, from Nine ,-d-to, it Five till Eight ; and all letters Immediately replied the fee of 11., for advice, &c.-9 BEDFORD - ST am- SQUARE. LONDON _.-,/' ~6 0 81 1 BIRTH& On the 16th inst., at St. Martin's RectorP ml 0. 10. the wife of the R ev . J o h n C . Mill er, of a ,d ugl ite ll ;;1, On the 16th in s t., in Abbey-road St. John ill k I. Pe l , George, of a son. or, the v 1p. 4, A t i ll . e p., l o 6 f th a s i o n n st a ., n a d t h i e V ir in . Windsor, wife:of A.. 0+ Es O q. n , On the 16th inst., the lady of Thomas Ch b aP t r , Montagu °place, Bryanston.square, of a daug da d() ; AfARRIED. , MO' Afr „ On the 16th inst., at Abbot's Ripton Churo".-jitsrigiptoill" shire, William H. Moubray, Esq., R.N , to Sel in h ' ho tt's, e 7 P D . / fourth daughter of J. Bonfoy Rooper, ' Esq* , A.-- th Bj-I ° tl ' l On the 17th inst., at York Chap-el, Walworth, 4100, R.. Reynolds, B. 1, of Halstead, - to Louisa ff...l>/ daughter of Silas Palmer, Esq., of Newbury. V . DIED. n e w Cad On the 7th i ns t., a t F en Ditt o n Rectory, ne— '' f ' Mr o s. n S t u i s ie an l n 3 a t i h i Berkley, aged aged 71. 0 Po e es a ick - e lf infant son of the Rev. Joh S n to C k . e E P ya ° o g s e . s' GO jet 1 gorse „, On the 15th inst.. Major Trent, of the Boy a' - Coill'-111 0 On the 16th inst.,. - S h Id the wife of bec , at out wo , Charles Rayley, aged 45. our 1° ii , Bright 6 ir J , On the 16th inst., in Brunswick-terrace , Martin, only daughter and heiress of the late 000 .4 A Martin Lloyd, Bart. rrhotti" - Fre er On the 17th inst., Allen, the eldest son of A bO O Shuter, Esq., of Hooley House, Surrey. f sr.l) St 4 On the 17th i ns t., R o b ert, f our th son o Walters, of Wilson-street, Finsbury-square. lisvaie'.4oc" On the 17th inst., On the 17th inst , in Woburn-square, John Il e gr P' ll ° Hicks, of Lower Tulse-hill. f p# 4' - --- - _ _ _--- __ _ _ ______-- _,.. c0. o „ei 7,0n- , ob: Printed And Published by NATI{DO 0 u .. 0 tl ie -et Y- Jane, the infant daughter of ' Stralld, P(l,itc,r, at The Sul: Office, N 0.112, straw' , ' OO OO , et' the SsvoY, ha the County of siddmoz' cember 31, IS4C. 8,502 3,34 7,275 5,757 5,661 9,876 4,430 5,429 30,5g 9