The Sun. — London, England, 1846-11-04 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, NA,. 3. IN RE PENDER. The arguments in this cas2, which were part heard yesterday, were resumed. The case came before the Court upon motion and petition, and related to the taxa tion of a solicitor's bill. This case came before the Court upon appeal from the decision of the Master of the Rolls, who decided that an unsigned bill of costs might be the subject of taxation, and from that decision the appeal was brought. The LORD CHANCELLOR , at the conclusion of the argument, said he ,A ould endeavour to give judgment to- morrow morning. The Court then proceeded to hear lunatic petitions, taking the unopposed. IN THE NATTER OF DICE SOMBRE. Upon this case being called on, which came before the Court upon the petition of Mr. Dyce Sombre, pray ing the supersedeas of the commission of lunacy that had been issued against him, Mr. ROLT stated that he had been requested by Mr. Bethel', who was engaged in the Vice-Chancellor of England's Court, to request that it might stand over till to-morrow morning. The LORD CHANCELLOR could not allow the ease to stand over to the prejudice of the other business of the Court. He wished to know whether any proposition had been made, or was likely to be made, on the subject of the petition, or any arrangement come to among the parties ? Mr. BOLT was not aware of any proposition for an arrangement. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought it most desirable that some attempt should be made to come to some arrangement, as he thought it must be evident, from the report of the physicians, what course the Court would think it right to take unless some arrangement was come to. He thought the best course woulsl be to let the case stand over for a few days, to see if counsel on both sides would not anticipate what the Court would do by coming to some arrangement. Mr. CALVERT was with Mr. Bethel], and was anxious to hear what suggestion the counsel on the other side would make. Mr. ROLT said that of course, if the case stood over, everything must remain in statu quo, and no further affidavits must be filed. The LORD CHANCELLOR—CertainIy. It is at my suggestion that the case stands over. I think the case had better stand over for a week to see if some arrange ment cannot be come to. Mr. ROLT hoped his Lordship would appoint a par ticular day for hearing the case. The LORD CHANCELLOR—Let it stand fur this day week. The COURT then proceeded to hear bankrupt petitions, but no case of any interest came before the Court previous to its rising. ROLLS' COURT, Nov. 3. COTTON V. COTTON. This was the petition of Benjamin Cotton; one of the parties in this cause, and who had obtained his majority, praying for the payment of two sums, of 2,9211 4s. sd. and 1,9581. 18s. 11d. Consols, which he claimed under the will of Joseph Cotton, his father. The testator had left one-half of his estate to his wife, after her death to be divided between his children; and the remaining half to be given them on the attainment of their majority. Some of the children had become of age, and accordingly received their respective moieties. The report of the Master had been made, and the petition was unopposed. Order granted. There were several other similar unopposed petitions, none of which possessed any public interest. THE MARQUIS OF HERTFORD V. LORD LOWTEIER. Mr. TURNER presented a petition from the Countess Zichy, praying the payment of arrears of certain life policies to which she laid claim. From the statement of the Learned Counsel it ap peared that the Union Company of Asmrance at Pans had agreed to pay the late Marquis of Hertford en an nuity of 22,750 francs, in half-yearly payments of 11,375 francs. In the codicil to the will of the Marquis of Hertford there appeared the following, viz. :—" There is a green box at Milan, with my name, containing letters front Naples, &c., which I leave, in case of my death, to Charlotte Stracklan, and desire that it way be given to her unopened." The codicil also bequeat hed, after pay ing certain bequests, &c., all the goods, chattels, &c., of which the noble testator was pos sessed, to Charlotte Leopoldina, Countess de Ziehy. On the 29th of March, 1843, the Master made his report on the administration suit of Hertford and Lowther, and found that the green box in question contained, among other things, a life annuity bond, dated Milan, April I, 1837. On the 4th of April an order of was obtained for the purpose of confirming this report. Exceptions were then taken to certain Polish and Austrian bonds contained in the box, which exceptions were allowed. Several other legal steps were then had recourse to, and the object of the present petition was to ascertain whether the Countess was entitled to the amount of the arrears due on the French policy at the testator's decease, as well as the arrear due on the Milan policy. After hearing the arguments on both sides in extenso, Lord LA.NODALE went through the case in detail, and having expressed his opinion as to the impropriety of bringing forward the case at all, dismissed the petition with costs. VICE• CHANCERY COURT, Nov. 3. (Before the VICE-CHANCELLOR of ENGLAND.) His Honour the Vice-Chancellor of England took un opposed cause petitions, motions, and petitions to-day. THORNHILL V. TIIORNHILL. This case came before the Court upon the petition of the infant, Miss Thornhill, praying that her mother might be continued her guardian, notwithstanding her subsequent marriage. The mother was appointed the guardian of her daughter by a codicil to the will of her late husband, and the petition prayed that she might continue to be so and receive the allowance. The VICE-CHANCELLOR made the order. Mr. B ET - H ELL , who appeared for the petitioner, stated that provision had been made on this subject in the mother's marriage settlement. FERMOR V. POMFRET. This case came before the Court upon the petition of of the present Earl Pomfret, praying for a reference to the Master to inquire whether it would be for the benefit of the petitioner's estate, that certain timber should be cut down, and certain repairs made. The VICE-CHANCELLOR made the order as prayed. IN THZ MATTER OF THZ SHREWSBURY ESTATE ACT. This was the petition of the trustees of the Shrewsbury Estate, praying for a reference to the Master to inquire whether the funds in court should be laid out in the purchase of certain lands. The Counr made the order for the reference. vaairir V. MINCIN. The Court was occupied the remainder of the day with the arguments in this case, which came before the Court upon motion for the new trial of an issue directed by the Court to inquire whether certain persons were trustees under a local Act, passed in the reign of George IL of certain premises in the neighbourhood of the Acielphi, between Villiers-street and Buckingham-street.. called York-buildings, and whether, as such trustees, they had a right to levy rates on the inhabitants of the neighbourhood, for the purpose of keeping those build ings in repair. The issue was tried before the Lord Chief Justice, and a verdict found for the plaintiff, and the present application was for a new trial of that issue. Mr. Walker and Mr. Elmslie were in support of the application, and Mr. Bethell and Mr. Schoenberg ap peared to oppose it. The arguments not having concluded at the rising of the Coart, the case will be proceeded with to-morrow. (Before Vice-Chancellor WIGRAM.) CAMPBELL V. THE BRIGHTON RAILWAY COMPANY. This was a bill filed against the Brighton Railway Company to test the question whether the holders of notes, issued on the loan of 300,0004, can claim the conversion of their notes into shares, if due notice be given of this intention previous to the year 1847. It appears that the company in 1842 resolved to raise a loan of 300,0002, and issued 40/. loan notes for five years at five per cent., and on the back of the note was an endorsement which gave the acceptor the option of converting his notes into quarter shares of 104, upon due notice being given before the 15th February, 1845. The defendants contend that these stipulations were -ele.arly embodied in t h e advertisement for the loan, the tender, and the endorsement on the loan note, and that while the option to convert was given, it was yet limited in time to February, 1845, and that the holders who have allowed this period to pass have thereby lost their right to shares in the company. Mr. Romilly, Q.C., Mr. Rae, and Mr. Adams, were heard this morning for the defendants. Mr. BETUELL (with who:n was Mr. Goldschmid) re plied for the plaintiff, contending on his part, that all that could be viewed by the Court as a contract, was that stipulation which appeared on the face of the loan note. The arguments having been finished, judgment was deferred. COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH, Nov. 3. (Sittings in Banco.) RAILWAY SHARES ON WHICH A CALL IS DIJE.- IWEIVEN V. WOODS AND OTHERS. Mr. KNOWLES, Q.C., applied for a rule to show cause why a nonsuit should not be entered in this case. The case was tried at the last Liverpool Assizes before Mr. Justice Cressweil, and a verdict was entered for the ,plaintiff with the permission of the Learned Judge sub sequently to enter a nonsuit. The acticn was for money had and received. The defendants pleaded non assumpsit. The ground on which Mr. Justice Cress well agreed to the application for a nonsuit was the dis puted question, whether an action for money had and received, would lie under the circumstances. The defendants are sharebrokers at Liverpool, the plaintiff; a gentleman, residing at Aberdeen. On the 13th of August, 1845, the plaintiff wrote to the defendants, re questing the m t o p urc h ase f or hi m 20 or 38 s h ares A the Limerick and Waterford Railway, and abarY the amount to the next account. Mae defend an t s , w h o were b roke rs only, purchased the shares from other brokers t in Liverpool, which they notified to the plaintiff , the same time sending him an invoice, and on th e 24 a 1 of Au gust, a few days before the account day, whi c h took place gust at the end of the month, the plaintiff remitt e d the de fe ndants 1461. 10s., t o defray the purchase of the shares , therefore j this was not a transaction between them a s priaci rd not , sell them as they pur 'chased the shares for the plaintiff, and tto him. If they had been the sellersth s e im e p a se would l have been different, but the money was full a contract into which they had entered ony antto be half. It is true they made themselves personally li a bl e to t h e .brokers of whom they purchased these shares. Thv s h am s were to be delivered to the plaintiff by the and. o f A u wust, but between the day of the purchase and the Jay for their delivery they were cal' Led in iy the promoters of the coni the' purpose of being registered , preparp pa ay for THE SUN, L tory to the payment of a call of Si.per share, it being understood that no transfer would take place until the calls were paid. The persons who had to pay the cads were those who sent in the shares, and a., they were sent in by the brokers, they were the parties looked to. The plaintiff, it would appear, was well aware of the call, as in two letters which he sent to the defendants, bearing date the 22d of September and the 14th of No vember, he expressed his belief that a call was then due. A month or two elapsed before the shares were re issued, and on the 19th of December the defendants ap plied to the plaintiff for the calls, and enclosed him an invoice for 1511. 10s., they being paid 1501. for the shares, and 11. 10s for the stamp. lie refused to pay the call, repudiated the bargain, and applied for the re payment of the money he had sent to them, stating that he had expected the shares fur that amount. Now he (Mr. Knowles) submitted that he was not in a position to repudiate the bargain, and that he could not sue the defendants for the money, because there was no failure of consideration, inasmuch as they had fulfilled their part of the transac tion. The plaintiff knew that a call was due, and that unless he paid it he could not obtain the shares. The defendants had paid 1601. altogether on account of the shares. The call was unpaid. Rule granted. THE NEW JUDGES.—The Chief Justice of the Com mon Pleas (Mr. Justice Erle) and Mr. Justice Vaughan, were sworn in in this Court shortly after its sitting this morning. BROMAGE V. VAUGHAN AND BEVAN. Mr. WHATELEY moved for a rule to show cause why a nonsuit should not be entered in this case. It was tried at Gloucester before the Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, and the jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff of 1641., with leave to the defendants to enter a nonsuit. The action was brought upon a bill of ex change, drawn by one of the defendants, Philip Vaughan, accepted by, a person named Beaumont, and endorsed by Vaughan in his own name, and that of the other defendant, they being attorneys in partnership to the plaintiff. The grounds on which a right of nonsuit was granted were simply these—whether the acts of Vaughan was to bind the other defendant (Bevan) and whether a proper notice of dishonour was given. The bill was made payable at the London Joint Stock Bank, whereas the notice of dishonour made it payable at the London and Westminster Bank. However, the two banks are under one management, although situated in different parts of London. Vaughan, it appeared, suffered judgment to go by default, but Bevan pleaded that he was not a party to the endorsement, and that he did not receive a proper notice of dishonour. It appeared, however, that bills drawn by Vaughan in a similar manner were paid with the cognizance of Bevan. Lord DENMAN intimated that he would consult Chief Justice Wilde on the subject. tuft, a few miles from Yarmouth. Remembers getting r to Yoxford about thirty miles from Yarmouth, and there I his attention was called to Mr. Lacon, who had been on the box, There were some words between Mr. Lacon and the coachman about an excels of luggage and passengers on the coach. Mr. Lacon sent for a post. chaise and left the coach. This was the plaintiff's case. Mr. CROWDER having addressed the jury, and called certain witnesses to testify as to the loading of the coach, I and Mr. WATSON having replied at some length, The Learned JUDGE summed up, and said that he certainly did not consider that the contract for the seat meant allowing a given quantity of room abstractedly from all other considerations, for much inconvenience might arise from such an interpretation. The question for the jury, after al!, was, whether the coach was so overloaded as to render the travelling in it of a dangerous character. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, Nov. 3. ;Sittings in Nisi Prius, before Mr. Baron PLATT and a common jury.) WELSBY V. BROWN. This was an action brought brought by the plaintiff, an attor ney, in the county of Stafford, to recover the sum of 571. 11s. 9d. for professional services rendered by him to the parish of Abbot's Bromley, during the year 1839, and following years, up to the present time, against the defendant, who during the years 1839 and 1840, was one of the overseers of the parish in question. Mr. Martin, Q.C., appeared for the plaintiff, and Mr. Watson,' Q.C., for the defendant. It appeared from the evidence given by various wit nesses, culled on behalf of the plaintiff, that expenses had been incurred by the plaintiff ht the removal of various paupers, attending orders, appeals, and sundry other matters of parochial business. It was contended by Mr. MARTIN, Q.C., that the de fendant had rendered himself liable to plaintiff for the payment of his account for services rendered to the parish, inasmuch as he had himself given the order for the performance of such works or services. Mr. WATSON, Q.C., on the other hand, contended that the defendant was not liable, and that even if he were so, it was a debt contracted prior to the time allowed by the statute of limitations. The case was one which would involve a great hardship upon the de fendant if he were ccmpelled to pay debts con tracted on behalf of the parish, and which should . properly be paid out of the rates levied from time to time for that purpose. It was the duty of the plaintiff to apply for his account during the year in which his services were rendered, as the parish had not even the power to make a prospective rate. The account rendered by plaintiff to defendant was not made out to Brown the defendant, but to the parish of Abbot's Bromley ; and in a note sent with the account, plaintiff stated, " I send you my account against the parish of Abbot's Bromley." With reference to those portions of the account referring to periods not affected by the statute of limitations, it was proved in evidence that Brawn, the defendant, was not the overseer, nor was lie in any way connected with the management of it> affairs, his year of office had expired. and other persons had been appointed as overseers. The plaintiff had not a single item in his account in which he stated that he had either insisted upon or received any instructions from Brown, since he had ceased to be overseer of the parish ; on the contrary, there were several charges made for attending upon the overseers, but those everseers were persons of the name of Chambers and Woodroffe, and it could not, therefore, be supposed for a moment that the defendant was liable to plaintiff for his attendance or professional advice up , n and with parties with whom he was not in the least degree connected. If such a practice were to be adopted, then, any person who had for on. 'year filled the office of overseer would be held liable for all expenses for ever after. Mr. Baron PLATT said that, with reference to the question of liability, there was no doubt that if the de fendant had given instructions to plaintiff, he would be clearly liable to plaintiff if those instructions were acted upon, even though the services rendered in con staluence of such instructions were for the parish; and the real question for the jury to consider was, whether the plaintiff did actually receive from the defendant those instructions under which he had acted. If they were of that opinion, of course a verdict must be given for the plaintiff for the sum claimed for those services, but he did not think that the overseer could be held liable for any work done, or services rendered after he had left office, and had no control over the matter. He would therefore recommend the jury to find a verdict for the defendant for that portion of the Maim set up by tht plaintiff for services rendered by him during those years in which defendant had ceased to be overseer. The jury accordingly found a verdict for the plain till for the sum of 181. 10s. 3d., and for the defendant the sum of 391. Is. 6d. Leave was given to move to enter a verdict for the plaintiff for the latter amount in order to raise the question, which was reserved by Mr. Baron Platt, as to whether the account rendered by plaintiff had or had not been properly delivered by plaintiff. FOXFORTH AND ANOTHER U. KING. This was a case tried at Newcastle at the last assizes, before Mr. Justice Cresswell, to recover the amount of a policy of insurance effected on the ship Helena, in which a verdict was returned for the plaintiff. Mr. WATSON, Q C., now moved for leave to enter a verdict for the defendant upon the first and second issues, and also for a new trial upon the ground of the verdict being against evidence. Upon the first and second issues the Learned Counsel contended that as the plaintiffs had parte , with their interest in the ship, by virtue of a bill of sale Nhich they had effected in favour of a Mr. Hutchinson, to whom the plaintiffs were indebted for sundry repairs done by him to the ship in question, in which bill of sale no mention whatever was made of the policy, plaintiffs cou!d not, therefore, have any claim upon the policy originally effected by them, they having parted with their interest in the ship upon which such policy was made. The ground upon which a new trial was sought was, that the verdict was against evidence, inasmuch as it was proved that the ship was not at the timeit was insured in a seaworthy condition, and also that a number of augur holes were discovered to have been made in the ship's side, and that in consequence of these holes, combined with her bad condition, the ship went down in still water, and not " in consequence of storms and tempes tuous weather," as set forth by plaintiffs in their decla• ration. The COURT stated that they would take time to con suit Mr. Justice Cresswell, in order to ascertain whether he was satisfied with the nature and amount of evidence given upon the trial. DROWN AND LANGSIDE V. PROUB. In this case which was one of that very numerous class arising out of the "railway department," and which was tried at the last Kent Assizes before Mr. Justice Coltman, a verdict was given for the plaintiff for the sum of 5441. lBs., being the amount claimed for work and labour done as an engineering surveyor for and on behalf of the Direct London and Hastings Railway. The defendant was a member of the previsional com mittee of the said company. Mr. Sergeant SHEA now moved for leave to enter a verdict for the defendant on the ground that he was not indebted to the plaintiffs, and that he had never employed them to survey the line in question. It appeared that the plaintiffs were employed by two persons of the name of Smith and Ryder, who were described on . the prospectuses as engineers tothe company. On behalf of the plaintiffs, it was endeavoured to be shown upon the trial that in the case of persons so employed by the engineer, it was the general usage for them to for payment from the company, and not to the engineer. The witness, however, called- to prove this " general usage," could not state or particularise any case in which such usage or . custom pre vatted, and in cross-examination stated, that "it pre vailed in large companies, but not in small ones." The Learned Counsel now . contended that such evidence should not have been left to the jury, as it was rot sufficiently explicit to substantiate the fact. The plaintiffs had also sent their account to Messrs. Smith and Ryder, and in consequence of its not having been paid, they had threatened them with legal pro ceedings for the recovery of the same, thereby clearly showing that they did not consider the defendant in debted to them, nor was any agreement produced in which it could be shown that either the defendant or the company were at all liable for the payment of the plaintiffs. Upon these grounds, therefore, it was contended that leave should be given to enter a verdict for the defendant. The Court stated that they would take time for the purpose of referring to Mr. Justice Coltman's note upon the evidence given at the trial. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Now. 3. (Sittings in Banco before Lord Chief Justice Sir Taos. WILDE, Mr. Justice MAULE, Mr. Justice PATTISON, and Mr. Justice V. WiLma)ls.) OATHS OF ABJURATION AND SUPREMACY.—O n the assembling of the Court this morning, the oaths of abju ration and supremacy were severally administered by the Clerk of the Court to the Lord Chief Justice and Mr. Vaughan Williams. WOOD V. WIT LIABIS AND ANOTHER. The plaintiff is a cab owner, and the defendants linen drapers, carrying on business in Oxford-street. The action, which was tried in the last Trinity term before Lord Denman, was brought to recover damages for in juries inflicted on a cab belonging to the plaintiff by a cart driven by the servant of the defendant. The jury gave a verdict for the plaintiff. It appeared from the evidence ad duced at the trial that the cab was on a stand, and that the cart, which was driven t,y a man named Phillips, came in collision with it, causing the injuries for which com pensation was sought. It came out, however, that the cart was only hired by the defendant from a person named Gamp, who employed his own driver, but on the day in question Phillips drove it, in the unavoidable absence of the driver; bet', ,re doing so, pri soner Gamp cautioned him, that if he did so it would be at his 0%4 n risk. The else had been twice tried, each time a verdict having bren returned for the plaintiff. Mr. KNOWLES to-day applied for a new trial, and contended that the ♦erdict was fallacious, inasmuch as the cart was not driven by Phillips on the authority of the defendants. Lord DENMAN turned to his notes, and held that the evidence proved that on the day in question the man Phillips was acting as the servant of the defendants, aq he had received directions from their foreman, named Collins, to drive the cart to a certain place. Looking at the whole of the evidence, he considered the verdict warranted by the evidence, and refused the application. WESTON V. POTTER. This case was tried at the last summer assizes at Ips wich, before the late Mr. Justice Williams, when a verdict was found for the plaintiff. Mr. O'MALLEY moved for a new trial on the ground of misdirection. It appeared that in May. 1845, tb plaintiff purchased a horse from the defendant for 281. The horse was ultimately attacked with lameness, which was supposed to result from a " splint" in the fore leg of the horse, which existed at the time of the purchase. The defendant had given a written warranty to the plaintiff as to the soundness of the horse. The question, therefore, at the trial was, whether there was a breach of warranty or not. It was shown that the plaintiff had exam'ned the horse before he made the purchase. One of the witnesses of the plaintiff said that the horse had no splint at the time, whilst all the others said that 'it was distinctly visible in the fore leg. The Learned Judge thus put the case to the jury. If the horse had a splint at the time of the contract, and afterwards produced his lameness. then the warranty was incorrect and the contract void; whereas, he (Mr. O'Malley) contended that the " splint" turned into lameness in consequence of the improper treatment of the purchaser, and that the " splint" was well known at the time of the contract, and was, therefore, excluded from the terms of the warranty. Lord DENMAN took time to consider the application, and in order that he might have an opportunity of con sulting the late Mr. Justice Withanas's notes. BAIL COURT, Nov. 3. (Sittings in Banco, before Mr. JUSLICP PATTESON, COOKE V. SIR W. R. TONKIN, KNIGHT. Mr. PHINN moved for a rule to show cause why the verdict given for the plaintiff in this case should not be set aside and a new trial granted. The Learned Counsel stated that the cause was tried before the Under-sheriff for Middlesex during the long vacation, and a verdict given for the plaintiff for the sum of 17/. 18s. 9d., and he moved for this rule on the ground that the verdict we.; agai , st evidence, and by misdirection. The action was brought for advertisements and prospectuses for a railway company called the Oxford, Thame High Wycombe, and Uxbridge Junction Railway, The plaintiff was the proprietor of the Oxfonl Chro nicle, and he sought to fix the defendant as a member of the provisional committee. It appeared on the trial that some meetings were held previous to the formation Df the company, at an office in Regent-street. The de fendant had acquiesced in a proposal made to him to become a member of the provisional committee. The only evidence adduced on the part of the plaintiff was, that the solicitor to the company had, through his clerk, given orders for the various items in the bill for advertisements, &c., to be inserted, and for papers con taining them. It appeared on the evidence, that on the formation of the company there was a managing committee, as well as a provisional one, and that ma• naging committee were entrusted with the affairs of the company. MI the items in the plaintiff's bill were for November, and the evidence only went to show thht the defendant, in October, attended two meetings, which were not, regular meetings, but meet ings held before the formation of the company. The managing committee had been appointed Wore the debt for advertisements had been contracted. When the defendant was a member of the provisional com mittee, it did not appear that there was any company for which they could act. The plaintiff's right to sue after the appointment of the managing committee was clear,but did not show that after the 10th of October any act was committed by the defendant, identifying him with the managing committee which then commenced. H e (Mr. Phinn) had submitted to the Under-sheriff that they were entitled to a nonsuit, as the managing com mittee were prima facie the parties who obtained credit. The presumption certainly was that the credit had been given to the managing committee, if, indeed, it had not been given to the solicitor. Two cases had lately been decided, viz , Lowe v. Wilson, and Banker v. Good. -- - Mr. Justice PATTESON—The cases have been cited frequently. In the Court of Exchequer yesterday, a rule was granted on that very point. There were two cases tried before me at Derby—but then there was some evidence that the provisional committee had au thorised the managing committee to act for themselves, and, of course, the Learned Counsel made the most of that, and it went to the jury on that ground. In this case there does not appear to have been anything done to connect the defendant with the managing committee. It, however, is not intended to be laid duwn as a matter of law, that on the appointment of the managing com mittee the provisional committee are freed from all liability. - The Learned JUDGE said that it was clear that the case must be discussed in full Court, as a great many cases of this kind would arise, containing nearly the same points as the one in which the rule had been granted in the Court of Exchequer yesterday.—Rule granted. _ _ _ (Sittings at Nisi Prius.) PICKFORD AND OTHERS V. LACON. This was an action brought to recover the sum of 3L 45., the sum which the defendant had contracted to pay in consideration of three seats being reserved for him in the plaintiff's coach from Yarmouth to London. Mr. Watson, Q.C. (with whom was Mr. Archbold) appeared fur the plaintiff, and Mr. Crowder and Mr. Montague Smith conducted the defence. Mr. WATsoN stated the case briefly. The plaintiff was a clerk in the Customs at Newhaven, and in June, 1345, went to Norwich with his wife and servant. On the 16th of June in that year he sent to 'engage three places in the plaintiff's coach to London for the following day. They eut?red their places, but on the coach reach ing Yoxford he got out, saying that the coach was over loaded, and proceeded with his wife in a post chaise to London. On the coach arriving at London, application was made to Mr. Lacon for the money for the fare, but he refused to pay it. lle stated that the coach was overloaded, but he was the only per son who seemed to entertain such an opinion, fir his servant proceeded to London without expressing any desire to leave. II;s clients had been anxious to try the present case as cheaply as possible, and therefore would have brought it on before the Under-Sheriff; but the Learned Judge was of opinion that the nature of the case rendered it siesirable that it should be brought forward in one of the higher Courts. Mr. C. J. Powell proved the license of the coach, which contained the names of the proprietors. Mr. Cooke stated that, in 1845, he was book-keeper fit the office at Yarmouth. Has seen all the plaintiffs there, and he has transacted business with them as pro- prietors. On the 16th of June in that year the man servant of the defendant came and took three places— one inside and two out. Directions were given that the passengers were to be taken up at Mr. Lacon's, on the quay. A pound was paid down. There were twelve people out.ide the coach. Mr. M‘lislarnara, a railway agent, proved that he was on the coach on the 17th of June. ile got up at Lowes- PATER V. BAKER. CHARGE OF SLANDER.—Mr. Sergeant CHANNE L moved for a rule in this case, which was tried during the last sittings after term in Middlesex, before Mr. Justice Erie. The rule sought was to set aside the verdict which was then obtained for the plaintiff, damages IEI. 125., and to enter a uonsuit, or else to grant a new trial, on the ground that the verdict was against evidence. The Learned Judge on the trial thought there was just enough of evidence to allow the case to go to the jury, though he (Mr. Sergeant Channel) believed the Learned Judge was not satisfied with the verdict. Leave at the same time was granted to move on another point, and to obtain leave to enter a nonsuit. The action arose from what is called a slander of title, and originated in the following circumstances:--The plaintiff, Mr. Pater, was a solicitor, and residing in a part of the paritl of St. Pancras, called Agar town, and had been for some time agent and collector for the gentleman from whom the name of the district was derived, and in the course of business he had erected twelve houses. While in an unfinished state, he adver tised them for sale, and a Mr. Kennedy was employed at the auctioneer. On the day of the sale, the de fendant, who is district surveyor under the Metro politan Building Act, attended the room, and before the business commenced, addressed the company to the following effect:—His object, in attending the sale, was to inform the purchasers, if any present intended to be such, that he would not allow the houses in question to be finished er occupied till the roads in connexion with them were finished. lie could not compel the roads to be finished, but he wished to inform purchasers that they would have to keep the carcases till the roads were made. This was the main count in the charge. There was another, which stated that several persons, in con. sequence of this intimation from Mr. Baker, declined to purchase. The plaintiff denied that the roads were in oNnoN, WEDNEsD_Av MOItNING9 NOVEMBER 4, 1846. the state represented , and that they were sufficient for conformity with the Act, and an action was accordingly brought- to recover damages. The plea of the defeedant was not guilty, and in his defence, he went to show th a t the roadway to the houses was not such as the - provisions of the Act required, and th a t t h e d ra ins were in a most imperfect state. In regard som e time sifter the di?) , of the s a l e t h e matter was re to the charges of M r . Baker re;pecting- the property, f - erred to the Commissioners, and they caused a view of 0 the property to be taken. The offi c i a l re f erees d ec id e d th a t the drains were in an imperfect s t ate, b ut t h at there was a roadway to the front of th e h ouses wide enough t of the Act ; but that it was pass, and therefore wide enoughallw fora in a very roug h and unfinished st ate . Th e defendant, however, in respect to the road, ca ll e d attent i on to t h e fact, that since the time he had atten d e d the sale it had been much impro ved ; a nd further, th at t h e w h o l e pro perty of Mr. Agar , of which Mr. P ater was agent, was in a most ose t a h v e engers cart requirements to imperfect state in regard t o d ra i nage an d roa d accommodation. The defendant, in th e course h e h a d taken, acted from no malicious moti ves , b ut f rom a s trong sense of his duty to the public, a fact which the judge had commented , on when summi ng up . H e (M r . Sergeant Channel) hoped, therefore, that their Lord ships would grant the rule to show cause against the verdict, and that they would consu l t the j udge as to whether he had considered the verdict satisfactorily. Rule nisi granted to show cause against the verdict. D AWSON V. MORRISON.—LIABILITY OF PROVISIONAL DI RECTORS. —THE OXFORD, WITNEY, CHELTENHAM, AND GLOUCESTER INDEPENDENT RAILWAY. This action was tried at the last Surrey assizes, before Mr. Justice Coltman, and a verdict given for the defen dant. A rule was now sought to set aside the verdict, on the grounds that it was against evidence and for mis direction. The plaintiff was Mr. Dawson, the advertising ag nt, who sought to recover 4961: for advertisements in serted in various newspapers, announcing a cer tain railway scheme, called the Oxford, Witney, Cheltenham, and Gloucester Independent Railway; the defendant was Mr. James Morrison, of St. Mary-at hill, one of the provisional directors of the said company. In the first prospectus of the company, advertised by the plaintiff, the name of th e d efendant was found as provisional director, and it appeared subsequently with a number of others. He had also been seen on several occasions at the office of the company, 58, Gracechurch street. The latter point had not been much depended on at the trial, as there was another company which met at the same address, of which the defendant was a shareholder. In answer to the action, the defendant denied his liability, and pleaded that he was not one of the com mittee of management, though his name had appeared as a member of the provisional committee. The allot ment of the shares, it was alleged in the prospectus, was placed entirely in the hands of the managing committee, as also the receiving of the deposits amd the application of the funds; th ere f ore, t h ere b e i ng no d ut i es or powers specially conferred on the general provisional committee, they could not be made liable for the account of the de fendant. Besides, the plaintiff denied that he had allowed his name to be used. The plaintiff, on the other hand, affirmed that the managing committee acted under the general committee, and that the latter were equally responsible ; that the applications for shares were addressed to the provisional committee ; and that it had been proved on one occasion that the defendant, on being referred to as a director to give informati on as t o th e res p ec t a bility o f an application, wrote against the party's name, " Vero good." This was an admission, though not in express terms, that he was a director of the company. If he was a director, then the plaintiff maintained that he was responsible for the debts contracted, though the Learned Judge had instructed the jury otherwise, and that from the terms of the prospectus, the managing committee appeared to b e t h e res p ons ibl e p ar ty, th e y b eing ad vertised separately from the general committee. A verdict was accordingly given for the defendant. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said the present case did not turn simply on the construction of the prospectus, but received aid and effect from the document which ha been referred to, and the letters addressed to the prose sional committee. Though the prospectus might not bear the construction that the provisional committee were the parti es b e f ore w h om suc h applications were laid, it w ou ld appear by t h e l e tt e r w herein the defendant h a d b een re f erre d t o a s a director, that though he had not signed expressly as such. he had made some admission of it by signing against the party's name " V ery goo d." Inasmuch as the question of the li a bili ty of the prov i s i ona l comm itt ee d i d not arise from the legal construction of' the terms of the pro spectus, but was to be taken from its effects and other facts in relation to the transactions of the company, th, judge had properly left the whole question to the jury, and the rule for misdirection could not go. But on ac eount of the great general importance of the case, and in order that the question might be fully considered by the Court, the rule to show cause that the verdict was against evidence would be granted. Rule nisi accordingly granted. KENT V. GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY. Mr. Sergeant CHANNEL moved for a rule to show cause why the costs in this suit should not be subject to taxation. He made the application on behalf of the de 4mdant, which arose out of an action brought by Mr. Kent lgainet the Great Western Railway Company, for over chargesfor conveying goods along the line. The action was tried before Lord Chief Justice Tindal last assizes, and a verdict for the plaintiff given for 1951. 12s. 4d. The print now at issue was the amount of costs; the plaintiff lid not oppose the taxing of the costs after the issuing o. , he writ, but objected to the same before that p' riod. Ihe charge made for costs before the i-suing of the writ w•as 1791. 3s. Gd. ; while the master had reduced the Amount by taxation to 1331. 12s. Tie Court took time to consider the application. GILES V. THE RYE HARBOUR COMPANY. erenbisu:sttiayed granted. Mr. BnamwELL applied fur a rule to stay proceedings in this case, on account of irregularity. The applica tion arose from Mr. Giles, the civil engineer, having in mtheemsabmeres directors of the Rye Harbour Company for the recovery s o t f itu l t , e s d oo a l. serz o p f la z i e n t t i i o ff ns h a a g d ainst several provisional ae the tly p o ro f ee th ed e ed com in m di i v u id ec ua f l ly going forward at the same time. Eleven of the defen amount, and they were defen tants for whom he appeared, as the cases were the same and the settlement ( f one would involve r a ' nd in order to avoid excessive costs, prayed proceedings might be stopped in all the cases, or at such one to be selected by the plaintiff ir ( t n o le' show cause why all the actions but one the i r n e s c t o recovery t o y f exactly shouldiaherl beal BABKER , V. THE PROVISIONAL DIRECTORS OF THE EASTERN AND NORTHERN JUNCTION RAILWAY COMPANY. This action was tried last assizes at Maidstone, before \Er. Justice Coltman, and was brought by Mr. Barker, the advertisine; agent, to recover 910/. from the provi sional directors of the Eastern and Northern Junction, Railway Company. A verdict was given for the plaintiff Mr. Bovit now moved for a rule to set aside the ver dict, and a nonsuit entered on the ground that the plaintiff had not produced the written orders for the insertion of the advertisements in the newspapers. Leave was given to move on this point at the time. The plaintifi was not a newspaper proprietor himself, but he received an order from the secretary to get the advertisements Inserted in certain newspapers named. The advertise ments certainly did appear in the newspapers, but no evidence was adduced that they appeared at the instance of the plaintiff. They 'right, for any proof to the con trary, have been inserted by some one else. The written orders to the several newspapers ought to have been produced to prove they had been inserted by the plain city; in failure of this, he submitted Mr. Barker could not recover. It was on this ground that he moved. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE thought there was no ground for the motion. The secretary of the company had given a certain order for the insertion of advertise ments in several newspapers. This, it appeared. had been done. There was no complaint on this head. The advertisements had appeared in the news papers, and there was no evidence whatever that they had so appeared at the instance of any other person that, the advertising agent. What might have passed be- tweet, the advertising agent and the newspaper proprie tors was immaterial to the case. The order was exe cuted in the manner prescribed by the defendants, and the Court, therefore, sissy no reason to disturb the ver dict.—Rule refused. The Court shortly afterwards rose. CENTRAL CRIMINAL COURT. OLD COURT. (Before the RE CORDER and Mr. Al d erman G xnne. ) Peter Hogan , a carpenter, aged 27, was indicted for stealing three hundred and one sovereigns in a dwelling house. It app eare d th at t h e prose cutrix, a widow named Welch, had saved somewhat more than six hundred pounds. 'rite prisoner, who was her cousin, and engaged in the building trade, was requested to look out for a house to purchase, and in the course of executing that com mission he became acquainted with the amount of her money, and the fact that it was in gold, packed up in rouleaus, and deposited in the bottom of her clothes that of which e_ hest. One evening, after the prisoner had visited Mrs. Welch's apartments in her absence, she found upon her return that her chest had been opened, and three hundred sovereigns in packages, and one sovereign in a silk purse, had been abstracted. She at once communicated her loss to the police, who took the prisoner, and found in his hat, wrapped in brown paper, 170 sove reigns. In his pockets were a few shillings. He said - t " mo ney was all his own. The sovereigns were packed in paper, which the prosecutrix swore was the same as she had made the packag es fir her g old. The puree was also found in his box. Mr. R oDrstsoN, for t h e d e f en ce, contended that the prisoner was about to get married to the prosecutrix, and was autho r i se d b y h er to l a y out the money for her ad vantage accordi ng to his best judgment. The R ECORDER su mmed up, and the ju r y , havin g deliberated some t i me, retur ned a verdict of Guilty. Whilst the j ur y were in deliberation the p risoner address e d t h e Court, an d b egge d to be allowed to call witnesses to pr ove th a t Mrs. Welch had p er j ured herself in swearin g to the purse , an d that he had bought it at Mr. Morgan's, in Middle-row, H olborn. Mr. Mor g an, however, proved that it was not so ; and the onl y thin g elicited f rom the witnesses was, that one of them bud been paid four sovereigns by the prisoner for his trouble in going shopping with him. Proof was then given of the prisoner's having been convicted of felony, and The REcoRDER sentenced him to be transported for fifteen years. The grand jury, in returning the remainder of the hills which had been sent up to them, made a presentment complaining Of the great want of accommodation for witnesses in waiting, and the difficulties of ingress and egress in all parts of these Courts. They expressed a hope that the proper authorities would remove the in conveniences complained of. The RECORDER said that the presentment should be attended to. POLICE INTELLIGENCE. MA RL BOR 0 17 GII- S TR b: E John Carrol, a respectable looking old man, was charged that morning with s! aling a p.uind and a quarter of shag tobacco fr , m his mulct' r. John Rogers, tebaceenist, Oxford-street, said this man , who was an old servant of hi•-, was preparing on Monday night to leave his work, hi, hat already on his head, when witness went round behind the counter to speak to him on business. The defendae t put off his hat., and the complainant, seeing something of bulk there, asked him what he had got in it. " Nothing," was his reply. But the complainant, not satisfied. p , llled np the handkerchief in the hat, and found below it a quantity of shag tobacco, hot from the pan, whi c h weighed more than a pound and a quarter. The de fendant positively said he knew nothing aboutits being there, and that it must have been plated in his hat by another. The complainant said to him he mu't at least have felt his hat heavier by a pound and a quarter than before, so as to be' apprised of the tobacco being there. Mr. LONG—Unless held un by the lining of the hat the tobacco must have fallen down upon the head when he put on the hat. The complainant said, it was pressed down in the hat. and. being hot, would adhere to the crown The prisoner said he had been now three and twenty years a servant to Mr. Rogers, during which time he had not had occasion to suspect him. He positiNely denied having any knowledge of the tobacco being ;11 his hat. He had been absent lately five weeks from his employment, in consequence of 'having had ore of his fingers cut off. and during that time ancther had been taken on in his place. When he was ahle to return that man was discharged, but was taken on again for a job last week. That person was in the shop with him lasi night, and prisoner's hat was set under the stair near the pan. Mr. LONG, to the complainant— Have you had any occasion to suspect him before? Complainant —W. Mr. LONG said, considering the long term of service which the defendant had completed in his empLyment, and the fidelity and known good character of the man, the improbability of his committing this theft was great. As far as any suspicion arising from the weight of the hat might affect the case, he thought it was very much diminished when it is considered that the man on the moment lifts the hat and immediately puts it on his head, and again immediately after puts it off, out of respect for his employer. On the whole view of it, he would dismiss ;he charge. CLERKENWE LL. Six Irish labourers, named Duignant, Gat, Malony, Towers, and Thomas and James Foley, were charged with creating a riot, and violently assaulting several constables of the S division, and a number of other persons, It appeared from the evidence, that at seven o'clock on Monday morning the prisoners attacked indiscrimi nately almost every person they met in Clarendon square and the streets adjoining. A policeman coming up, endeavoured to protect a gentleman whom he saw Thomas Foley assaulting, when l'e was knocked down twice, and the whole of the prisoners endeavoured to rescue Fo'ey, and it was not until a large reinforcement of police came from the station-house that the riot could be quelled, and the prisoners locked up. Mr. COMBE ordered each of them to pay a fine of 205., or be imprisoned one month. Wm. 'Skinner, driver of the cab, No. 1,764, was charged with gross cruelty to a mare. James Douglas stated that he owned the mare, and entrusted it to the prisoner to drive on Monday. On bringing it home at ill& t he (Douglas) found upon ex amination that it had been most cruelly ill-used. All under the flanks she was raw, from the effects of con tinued lashing, and one of the nipples was completely cut off. The prisoner. in his defence, stated that he was obliged to flog her to make her go. Mr. ComnE said it was as gross a case of cruelty as ever came under his knowledge, and he should commit him for two months to the House of Correction, with hard lal-our. The prisoner was then locked up, swearing vengeance against the prosecutor. SOUTHWARK. William Sncw, a well-dressed man, was charged before :11r. Seeker with stealing three whips, the property of Mr. Matt iews. a boot and shoemaker, near the foot of Blackfriars-bridge. George Grey, a diminutive person, shopman to the complainant, stated that between four and five o'clock the preceding day, while in the warehouse, he was in formed that a tni-n had been observed to take some whips which were exposed for sale outside the shop-door. He pursued the pri-oner and charged him with the robbery, which he at first denied, but he afterwards burst out laughing, and exclaimed that he did take the whips, but it was out of a " lark," and that he had hidden them in • doorway down Holland•street, where they were subse quently found. When called on for his defence, - the prisoner said, the fact is your Worship, the man who has given me in charge, as you perc ive, is a dwarf, and on that account all manner of tricks are played upon him by the boys who pass the shop. As I was passing the shop yester day, seeing the whips, I took them out of a " lark," in tending to have brought them back again. Recollect your Worship, that I pointed out where the whips were concealed. Mr. SECICER said the prisoner's defence was a most extraordinary one, and that h;s assertion with respect to boys playing tricks upon the dwarf did not justify him in taking that away which did not belong to him. lie (the Magistrate) should not commit the prisoner for trial, but he should adjudge him to a penalty of 20s. for unlawful possession ; and, as a piece of advice, he would :dyise him in future not to practise such " larks," as he termed them, again. Major-General Sir Henry Pottinger, the newly appointed Governor and Ct inmander.in Chief at the Cape, will not, according to the latest arrangements, leave before the middle of this month. It is expected that he will embark at Southampton. The last intelligence received from Admiral Sir W. Parker was dated the 26th ult. He was then with his squadron sailing for Lisbon, with the view of afford ing protection to British subjects and property there, and, if necessary. an asylum to her Majesty and the Royal Family. His mission would not authorise him to interfere in the internal dissensions of the country, but only to protect, as far as possible, British interests from any danger to which, in the course of' the insurrection, they might be exposed. Colonel Wylde, who left Ports mouth yesterday in the Cyclops steamer, will in the first instance touch at Oporto, the principal ieat of the insur rection, and thence proceed to Lisbon. On Monday, the 2d instant, a general assembly of the Academicians was held at the Royal Academy of Arts, in Trafalgar-square, when Mr. Edward Matthew Ward was elected an Associate of that institution. We have much pleasure in stating that the health of Mr. Colquhoun, M.P., which has been seriously im paired is daily improving, and that all darger is past. The Hon. Member has been suffering from a violent attack of gastric fever, and at one time he was in a very dangerous state. He will shortly, with Mrs. Colquhoun, leave his seat in Scotland. for Brighton. AMOUNT OF NUTRITIOUS MATTER IN THE FOLLOW ING ARTICLES OF ANIMAL FOOD.—In 100 parts: bones, 510; mutton, 290; beef, 260; chicken. 270; veal, 240; pork, 250; blood, 215; cod and sole, 210; brain, 200; haddock, 180 ; white of egg, 140 ; milk, 72. On an average, the nutritive matter in a pound of meat is not more than fonr ounces. This, however, applies only to raw meat, for when dressed a considerable portion of its constituent matter is dissipated,—The Plough. RAILWAY COMMUNICATION BETWEEN LONDON AND EDINBURGH.—A contemporary states, that when the line of rail is completed between Berwick and Newcastle the journey from Edinburgh to London will be a matter of fifteen or sixteen hours. It is questioned whether the journey will be of such a duration by several hours By the present speed of the Great Western express trains the distance between Edinburgh and London would be traversed in about nine hours and five minutes ; and by the speed of the London and North-Western express trains in eleven hours. But beth the broad and narrow gauge companies have proved that the present speed of heir express trains can be considerably increased. The working of the broad gauge engine called the " Great Western" shows that with trains of 80 or 90 tons an average express speed of fifty miles per hour may be easily attained, and the recent private trip on the North- Western line between Birmingham and Manche a - er, the working of which was conclusive that with light passen ger trains the narrow gauge engine can run from Lon don to Edinburgh in ten hours. There is reason to be lieve that some new narrow-gauge engines that have lately been placed upon the North-Western line would, with moderately heavy trains, accomplish the journey in less than ten hours. The mail from London to Liver pool (203 miles) was about twenty one hours en its journey. The Great Western express train would tra vel to Edinburgh and back in two hours' less time. There is little doubt that a mail train will, upon the completion of the railways to Edinburgh, run the whole journey between London and that city within ten hour:. THE ARCHDUKE PALATINE. —W e h ave great satisfaction in copying the following paragraph:— " Pestb, Oct. 22.—The Archduke Palatine is not dead, as reported in the papers of yesterday. The medical bulletin issued this day respecting the health of the Archduke Palatine has excited general joy, inasmuch as it confirms the reports which were afloat yesterday of the great improvement in the state of his health. His Imperial Highness Archduke Charles, elder brother of the Archduke Palatine, left his august brother this morning, which is considered as an evident indication of the confidence with which the recovery of the Archduke Palatine is anticipated. The Archduke Stephan is still here, and many touching scenes are related which be token the deep feeling of the young Prince at the sick hod of his fathe r . Th e b ulletin states, His Imp er i a l Highness enjoyed great composure and throughout th e w h o l e o f yesterday. quietude He has pass 'd a very tranquil night, and his recovery proc . v e l eds gr iduatly. —W B 1 en, Oct. 22, n i ne o ' clock, A.. ll URLEM. Dr. Steintnapler, b o dy p h ys i cian to the Archduke Charles, set out with that Prince yesterda y, " DREADFUL ACCIDE NT IN THE DORCHESTER TUN NEL.—on Wedneiday last, soon after one o' c lo c k, a labourer, wor ki ng i n a portion of the tunnel forming for Southampton andas walking Dorchester o a the Rallway, i n th e E ast Mag dalen's Field, w iron rail at the m omen t a loaded wa ggon was approaching powerful h orse, w h en the shoe of h l rs left foot , which drawn w by a very defectiv e , caug h t in the rail, andhe fell l with his s leg across the iron ; the wheel of the loaded wa g gon passed obliquely up the poor fellow's his heel to the calf, lacerating; the flesh, ad leg le fr r i g the leg frightfully. He was picked up,' but had fainted, and was conveyed in an insensible state to the South Hants Infirmary, when it was found that amputation was in stantly necessary to have a ch ance o f saving life. The poor sufferer w as warned in the morning, it being his first engagement in the works, to becareful in walking on the me ta l s ( as the rails are : his bad shoes, and h e had called by the men) with promised to be careful. The poor fellow's leg Was araptitqted, MARKET NEWS-(YESTERDAY.) tr.e:Y IVIII.M.ILE,TL, SMITHFIELD.--Meadow HaT,2/ETst(73l 16s; Clover ditto, 318 s to 4/ 16s; atm Straw, 1/ 6s to 1/ 12s per load. Trade dull, at the above quotatioLs. Ctimßnin.A.my.--Aleadow Hay, 2/ 8s to 4/ ; Clover ditto, 318 s to 41 15s; and Straw, 1/ 8s to 11 13s per load. A toll average supply, and a sluggi4l demand. WHITECHAPEL.—Meadow Ilay, 2/ 8s to 3/ - 17.5; Clover ditto. 3110 s to 51; and Straw, if 7s to I/ 12s per load. Supply goud, and trade dull. (From the London Yew Price Current of Nove nber 3.) Sueratt.—To-day prices declined for several descriptions of Raw Sugar available for tnine consumption, the demand being less active and the quantity - brought to market la. ge. West India was purchased with cllitinn for the sca4e pan, and the rates taken were 6d per cwt under those ..t Friday for brown, grey, and the low. r kinds of yellow, but goid and tine generally sust 'hied the former value. REFINED.—To-day.refiued goods were in excellent request by the home trade, but no further improvement took place in p ices, although the price is small. For Bonded Crushed Sugar the market has a firmer appearance, a good deal has been done, 'And 32s 64 per cwt paid for first quality. MAURITIUS.—This afternoon at public sale 350 bags 336 casks 16 trcs and 11 brls of Mauritius Sugar only in part sold at a fall on last week's rates of 6d to Is. per ewt—tine yellow went at 51s, gout! 49s to 50s 6d, middling 47s to 48s, low 45s 6d to 465 6d, fine brown 445 to 455, good 435, middling 38s to 39i, low dark 34s to 365, and very low 33, per ewt. EAST INDIA.—This afternoon the; quantity of Bengal Sugar brought forward was extensive, and consisted of seven public sales, containing 13,017 bags; nearly the whole was actually disposed of, but at a decline on former rates of 6d to is per cwt; superior grainy white sorts, however, sus tained the formed value, arid white Benares brought prices nearly equal to those of last Friday. FOREIGN.—This afternoon at public sale 78 cases 1 box and 38 barrels of Bahia Sugar were all taken in at about the former value—fine yellow at 475, good 465, middling 455, fine blown 44s to 44s 64, good 435, middling 42, and low to 41s. 10 hhds Cuba Muscovado, low yellow, 46e. 188 Ipackages of Savanilla, good y e llow ol s , d amp 4 9 5, an d l oaves 54s per cwt. Csicoi.—West India has met., with little attention pri vately, although there are sellers upon rather lower terms, and at auction a part only of 521 bags Grenada sold at 39s for good middling, and et 40s for good red. The value of grey Trinidad according to quality is 35s to 425, and red 36s to 46s per cwt. COFFEE.—This afternoon Native Ceylon was only in limited request, and of 1,838 bags at auction a small part only sod at about the former value. Plantation was in go 'el demand, and 33 casks 41 barrels at auction sold at stiff( r rates; ordi nary grey at 45s 6d, good ordinary 491 6d. fin*" fine ordinary pale of a favourite mark 60s to 63., di at g d 453 to 50s, / es berry sound 655; 11 casks Jamaica sold at 35s 6sl for triage; 86 bags of Penang sold at the full worth—fine fine ordinary brown at 35s to 38s, fine ordinary 30s to 30s 6d, and damaged 23s to 32s per cwt. TEA.—Although black can be obtained upon previous low terms, privately still only a limited business has been trans acted, the heavy stock causing the trade to purchase only sufficient for immediate wants, large as the consumption is, and moderate as prices are, common sound Congou being obtainable at 8d to Bd, good common 9d to 9id, Pouchong 43 to 73, and better quality 8d to 10d. Notwithstanding the low rates that prevail for green, still there has been little desire manifested by the town or country trade to operate. In Scented Orange Pekoe there has been little passing, although good to fine can be obtained at is 6d to 2s per lb. At the public sales of 27,640 pkgs, the trade evinced little desire to operate, notwithstanding the low rates at which some of the merchants were sellers, and the total quantity disposed of amounted to only 1,800 pkgs, nearly the whole damaged, and in small pkgs; a regular break of low sound common Congou brought 8d to Bid per lb. Merchants this year have already experienced a loss by importing of Tea of half a million sterling. SPICES.—To-day the market was well supplied with Nut megs, and the quantity offered at public sale amounted to 129 chests 6 boxes 4 bags; the demand was good, and the whole sold; fine sorts fetched full rates, but other kinds de clined in value Id to 2d per lb. Mace is wanted, and 38 chests at public sale sold at stiff rates. Cloves met with little attention, and 40 chests P enang so ld rat h er lower. In black Pepper there was little passing privately, but 137 bags of Penang at auction sold at full worth. • Sztarrs.—There has been a considerable increase in the demand for Leeward Island Rum since our last Price Cur rent was issued, and a rise in prices of 2d or 3d per gallon has taken place. For Calcutta the demand has been brisk, and an advance in the value of 3d took place. Demerara has been in good request, and prices are rising,3B 3d to 3s 6cl having been paid for strong sorts 30 to 36 per cent, over proof. In Jamaica the operations have been upon a more extended scale, and it is difficult to purchase at former rates. The value of Havannah and Brazil proof strength is is lid to 2s per gallon. For Brandy the demand has been good for all descriptions, chiefly from the home trade, and prices are rising. Geneva is wanted for exportation, and the parcels sold were at 2s 8d to 2s 9d for common, and at which holders are firm. COCHINEAL—This afternoon there was a good demand, and the parcels offered at public sale, amounting to 364 bags, which all sold at 4s 6d to 5s 7d for low to fine silvers, and one bag black at 6s 4d per lb. SALTPETRE.—To-day Rough met with attention, and 554 bags at auction were sold at full rates. English Refined has been in good request at 29s 6d to 30s. In Nitrate of Soda a fair business has been done at 16s 6d to 17s per cwt. OrLs.—There has been an extensive demand for Linseed Oil for home consumption on the spot since last Tuesday ; several export purchases have been made, and a further ad vance in the value has occurred. For forward delivery a good deal has been done at 27s 3d to 27s 63 per cwt. Rape Seed Oil has been in good request, and prices are moving upwards. There has been an extensive demand for Olive Oil chiefly from the home trade, and advanced rates have been paid. Cocoa Nut has-been largely dealt in privately, and a further advance in prices took place. Palm has been much in re quest by private treaty, and quotations are yet rising. Seal has been disposed of to a large extent, and at prices showing a rise on those of this day week of 40s to 60s per tun. Southern of every description is much wanted, but few par cels are to be had, and a further advance in the value has occurred. Cod has risen from 271 lOs to 28/, and and at which many parcels have been disposed of. In Sperm large purchases have been made by p:ivate treaty, and fur ther advance rates are'paid. Lard Oil has been purchased with caution at 38/ to 441. TALLOW.—Prices have assumed a downward tendency for Russian, there having been large arrivals since our last re port, but on the spot the demand hes been good from the town and country trade, and 49s to 49s 6d per cwt. are the rates accented for fine P. Y. Candle. For delivery in spring months qu dations have fallen to 495, but thereat many pur chases have been made. Of other kinds of 'fallow several parcels have been sold, but upon rather lower terms, and a larger quantity has been brought to market. LATEST PRICES OF SHARES, DT BANKS, ASSURANCE, AND OTHER COM PANIES' STOCK. From els Official List, ÜBLISIIED EVERY TUESDAY AND FRIDAY EVENING LONDON, TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3 JOINT-STOGIE BANKS. Dividend Amount 1f Narre of Company. per of Paid. Pricy ) 1 . Annum. Share. -- w £ s. d. X s. d. australasia .......... 6/. per cent. 40 0 0 40 0 0 - h itritsh North American 51. per cent. 50 0 0 50 0 0 _ , :omrnercial of London Si. per cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 '- lolonial .••.•• • • • • • . 51. per cent. 100 0 0 '25 0 0 - t. '.ondn and Westminstr 6/. par cent. 100 0 0 20 0 0 it ndon Joint-Stock .• • 61. per cent. 50 0010 0 0 15% , i t radon ••.•• • • • • - 25 0 0 710 0 . 7. Provincial of Ireland•• Si. per cent. 100 0 0 25 0 0 - 1, Ditto, New B/. per cent. 10 0 0 10 0 0 - National of Ireland .. 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 20 0 0 _ „ Nat. Provncial of Eng. Si. per cent. 100 0 0 35 0 0 Ditto, New•• •••• • • • 51. per cent. 20 0 0 10 0 0 - 3, Union of Australia•-• 61. per cent. 25 0 0 25 0 0 I; Union of London. •• •• 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 10 0 0 - I; INSURANCE COMPANIES. n It Dividend Amount Name of Company. per of Paid. Pric . o Annum. Share. £ a. d. X s. d. Anion •• ••••••• • • • • • 3/. 101 500 0 0 50 0 0 75 •' tlliance Brit. and For. 6 per cent. 100 0 0 11 0 0 18 3 4 .. .. 13s. 6d. pr eh. 50 0 0 5 0 0 r 11:b4 e Ditto Marine ..... .. 6/. per cant, 100 0 0 50 0 5.% r • c • i • al •• 7s. per share 1 5 00 0 0 0 0 0 , ~ 0 0 4 0. I rt e li r at i is c s I l i , hiC m e .o d .m. . B‘ .. Ci e. en.L i fe 51. per cent. 100 0 0 210 0 - 10 0 0 t 3/. 10s. 50 0 0 5 0 0 is ICagle •• • _ Eng.& Scot. Law .... 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 20 0 3 European Life . ..... 5% per cent. 20 0 0 All paid. 20 )' enemasons' ......• • • 51. per cent. 20 0 0 3 0 0 is ' .;obe ••.•••••• • • • • • • 6/. per cent. Stock. 36 10 0 gs IA i . imperial Fire . ...... . 6/. an d b onus 500 0 0 0 0 23 i - 11 .50 rnperial Life • • ...... 12 s. 100 0 0 10 0 0 e indemnity Marine.... 1/. sh.& bs. 100 0 0 513 1 31 it Law Life l/.55. 100 0 0 10 0 0 _ Legal and General Lif e - - " 50 0 0 20 0 61A i•Jndou Fire e :.ondon Ship 4 54. 1 p. e p r e c r e e n t t : 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 _--‘ 10s. 25 0012 10 0 151 : Marine..red.lnlld • &• •G • • e • n • . • L • fle • Fational Lean Fund 5l. per cent. 20 0 0 210 0 - National Life... .. •.• • 8/. per cent. 100 0 0 60 0 8 1 i alladiuin Life..,..,,, 51. per cent. 50 0 0 2 0 0 2/. 0A _ ''hcenix . .. • . ....... 205 e rotector Life.... •• • 5/. per cent. 20 0 0 1 - 0 . 0 , 'i ovident Life •• • • • • 1 ,:oyal Exchange ..... . 5/. I, :ock Life.... • • 1 /. 55. 100 0 0 10 0 0 23 per cent. St ck. -" •••• • • • • 4s. 50 0 010 0 4 3, iiii - 61. 10s. o - Ditto Life ... • . ••••• 1/. 6s. - - 210 1 ~,i v.Tqai Lif e - - 49 ' - LIST or SCOTTISH COMPANIES' PILICLS D ividend Amount Name of Company. per of paid. Prig. Annum. Share. , ----------- ------ --- , : 3 1. r o i y t a i s l i hank : L a i n n k e n ot e . Scotland 61. 8 6 1 1 . . pr cent. e n t . !lank of Scotland ..... £ e. d. .£ s. d 61. per cent. - 100 0 0 176 ...= 100 0 159 100 0 0 220 I Commercial Bank ...• 6/. per cent. - 100 0 0 162% National Bank .. ..... . Gl. per cent. - 10 0 0 141.14 s Union Bank of Scotland 7 , il. pr cent. - 50 0 a 92 1 A, IVestern Bank .....• • • 6/. per cent. - 50 0 0 8414 North of Scotland Bank 61. per cent. - 50 0 7% Cl ydesdale Bank.... • • 6/ . per cent. - 10 0 0 1:11g Eastern Bank... .. •.. 5/. per cent. - 10 0 0 1.1 1 / s Caledonian Bank - 210 0 41. 4s. Edinb.Bt Glasgow Bank 6/. per cert. - 50 0 71. Os. ~:Ity of Glasgow Bank . Si. per cent. - 10 0 0 13/. 6, Scottish Union Ins. Co. 51. per cent. 20 0 0 1 0 0 245. 6,1 Hercules Insurance Co. 71. per cent. 100 0 0 10 0 0 14.,5, lnsar. Co. of Scetlnd 5/. per cent. 10 0 0 All paid. 10 North British Incur 5% 1. pr cent. ,200 0 0 10 0 0 27) Caledonian Fire Incur lOl. per cent.'loo 0 0 10 0 0 24 Editi',urgl i Life Insur 6/. per cant. 100 0 0 12 10 0 18 ►i Edin.&Glasg. Railway 1/.los. pert. 50 0 0 50 0 0 72 Ditto, C Shares.... 7s. 6d. p. s. 12 10 0 All paid. 18 Edin., Leith, & Grantn - 20 0 0 20 0 0 18 Bawer& Ayrshir Rail. 71. per cent. 50 0 0 All paid. 6914 Glaagw& Greenck hail. 2/. per cent. 25 0 0 111 paid. 16% G:sgw&Garnkirk Rail. AL per cent. i 25 0 0 All paid. 31”.4 Dundee& Arliroth R lail. 6/. per cent. 25 0 0 All paid. 37 standard T.iteAssarnee.l 5/. per cent. 50 0 0 I 2 10 0 9 DOCILE. • Dividend Amount i Name of Company. per of I Paid. I Price. - Annum. Share. 1 I I X a. d. j £ s. d. Commercial -•••• .• • 3/. per cent. Stock. i - 80 0 East and West India... 61. pr cent. Stock. ' I - 142 Fast Country - 21 ji I andon ...... - 113 '.t. Katharine .... ••• • 5 per cent. ' Stock, - 9 9 % E 4outiiampton ••• .• •• •• ' 4/. per cent. 50 0050 0 0 - WATER-WO RKS. ...- Dividend Amount , N,ime of Company. ; per a I Paid. Price, ti A.mium. Share. -----_. - -- tl • £ s. d. I East L0nd0n.........• 8/. 100 0 0 -...- 204 - Grand Junction ...:.. 3/. 109. 4; 13 4 I - 90 Lc Kent.... • • ,. ~ , 2/. 101. 100 0 0 - - Vm41 1 §11............. Si. per cent. 100 0 0 - 57 nit Midal9so,X • • • 4i• 56. pr Qt. 63 12 0 ..., - In ------,-------_____..---•- --- WORKS by ROBERT J. CULVERIVELL, M.D. 11314.8' One ;shilling each, by post One and Sixpenea 1. W SINGLE no d MARRIED Lill (An Original Medical History.' CONTENTd: rit AnticAffectii;ati ; l a and Alaternal Intluenre—Pbe,oniena of CEstation—Oo In e lc trurs d i I h rA t e e cn r i t all i ° l 3 : Ls ‘ol at i C i et:llT gl i t . Lo I L I 11 , l o i ( 0 1 t rrasitteltici)tandilS; Alatchee—Cari,,,ilio. ot 'l.,,itt • 1 Y'" .' )1(""} Pe Uhions,—lncongruom AhlanceA-Late 31arrull000, y-t irew t..r , - • ite. :ix, 2 On I es.‘.--, VI 1 , L ,," iLs . lyynl , cil , ' sll,Nr"" 011 . rib;ay io r '646.) -I 1, 1;1, -:: I; 1115 LINO mottles 1 discourse. . !. 1i,,,,1u0,bs by nature, a nd by art acquir'a. 01 3: , t , :, ~,,,,I'd, and disappoint/oats keel', :.,,o,•, .-,, :.. 1 :: '4. II ‘ 'natured au.: ogg , at:. 101141 y aliti iii, 11.“1,.1—aii ,tisttiM. .__ t. i s i iV . ll, latpp'lleSa - - 3. Wii AT to EAT, Dial\ K, and AVOID With Diet Tables tor all Compla tranquil p dot oingal Contents : - -How to ensure perfect digestion, I py ~ : , ,0 , 1 i,ight's r.-et, a clear head, and a contented it5,,.....i on % servance 01 the instructions herein containe: the te-f.incell; veusly deitca e, even to ti.e most shattered consfltution.f;4oT the peatest amount of physical happiness, and reach In full period. ot life allotted to man. lin t; DP I " " How we should ilve—what eat, what dnnk. w „ To reach in health lull threescore years ands en. ...,. 1 , t o . These interesting little volume:, although bearing V'„ i i l a y. very delicate biped, as their titles imply, will be ever!living curable and keneral utility, tor fluty tell ot matters n o O S , tore able ti understan I ought to know, but rdlich nig il a ll t ° e d ' l'v't. these enlaft% tened times, except that quality prom 0 ( question:llo,e hannels, is et a very terrible discount...,,,en trut.vi In the exposition hereby oftured of the till now f in r u e l iv i, itil i : o , nature, e t It anoan disappointments and their wil o ,_ ° ,. o vn Ob ' t 0 contended that every reader rhall become his or "e'.,,,0a Olio any more than their own lawyer, hut it Is should know the simple principles of our *WO niste,l_...i-on, tlis e '4 oreiv i 7;oo. l whereby our existenee and the issue thereof in !De in o n irsi t ori states depend, the duties that are expected 01 u ,,!,,i, t heb eel ,i/. , capacities in the family circle, and the terms on wai' io n to ino. happiness of the present and future race of wali i ' M . ' waif i' DP 0 By such knowledge, and which is herein fait . 0 nat!i oia t health will be found tbe in our own keePill'„nt in l or iitS within the attainment of all , by the availnient ne'.'„ or s' iar t consistentbeo exulted follow , and w itot our duty to ourselves, we secure the lit e advantages,,re," wh!ciiignit,l t h: e de s ie re n m er t a t te et he per alth fe , cti th o e n rn : dually by the cultivation 7t our la t he D' i ii,Dei asndre es P o f„ , r , t, j , h .t Deco la of God's creations. ,„,,e of h l9 . es o The author's justification for this seeming en''''otst be ' l ot t/'e ings, and the avowal of their integrity of purPose,__otes , by their perusal—his accredited qualifications g....... 0. ... 0, i t , Fl t-strect ; ll A tt u n t n ite ty r , , topics broached involve his legitimate study and LIT: corvsfn ( li; °,, T e o be had of -herwood, 23, Paternoste-ro: ' 3 9, 04 INlan!',,,neet Ovelione direct from the Begs:T:000o :410 Great Marlborough-stree.), who may he s /i irn ' W l° 6 10 3 , ,Otxrgloyrdle•pt e c e e t , ; matters daily till Three, and ill the Eveldags."-° -----------1-----------• ' Ollll 'isl) ON THE SECRET Im.NAFTIRAIIITTIIF.S :::.:00,,,,,i.ei5et;t,,,, WITH TWEN TY-F IV F. COLOU Itt: , _ se ool %,,,0 • Just published, Twentieth Thousand, in ° a . 6 4, in 1 ' a tiA 28. 64., or post paid, to any address, ter '''' „i Tre:, 4o direct from the Author's residence. . m ec liCo ,,,i y o: 00 , SELF PRESERVATION : i ", t youo „ Al6O on the Secret Infirmities and Disorder si, . i , t coo ..‘ Illustrated with Twenty-flve Coloured I ilr'; ite prod! 011 end Physiel-gy, and Disease s of the Ur art & d futia rio; o , 1 40 0 . ; exping their various structures , uses ' . n a elitari 1 ',„,',0t e l ' st , the injuries that are produced in them, by ~, Trea' - o tler " excesses. With Practical Observations on ` es ,. and . 4, .Debility, Local and Constitutional We al " ) 10 0. t o , n St the Urethra. 0 Tli' don: 11 10 il By SAMUEL LA'MERT, CONS '„,., Lon . . fa a, si os Matriculated 9,miteemdbfoerrd-osftretheet, ultednivfoerrsdg,cin; 14U le l t er , 1,10 0 Member of the London Hospital gedicin 11 0 75 ' Apothecaries' Hall, London. Sce., ke• ~,roit• . 4 ,10 00 di CONTENTS OP THE . 1 1, . , Wl` t iff e nell i • 1111fr iSg ' r odll , C gf( CHAPTER 1. On the l'hilosophy of ~, vop c the oot e s and Obligations, and on Infelicitous an.„ 010 0 e' ..0 ,14 . ,,,,0,,, CHAPTER 2. On the Anatomy rbY ' ro iong, P; r 1 ,c0:: 0 ',O Organs, their ftinctions, structures, and see . _ .. ..„, a the. e fic' , ,,,,as'. - „, Mental and Physical Power are dependnet,.,.'carions_, i at 7,0,5 —Cnarrzx 3. On Solitary Habits; thel i pe bitie o ! e atri r d 1 1 . : 0 An Economy ; the concealed cause oi . ~,ever s, l _r d e 0 of"." 0 of the Stomach, Lungs, and Brain, anu,.' era t 11' 0. 41 , 4 i• o a Mental Faculties. CHAPTER 4. On the "" u , and , 5 t a soP and Maturity, and the Treatment of Ner /° , s arls7:,,. Mental Debility, and Premature DecaY. ,`'.. f%co"' sY the Disorders arising from indiscnininalyratare• A i a' Gleet, Strictures, and other Diseases of Or o. i * 4'o9 REVIEWS Of THE Vio d woe' ' ble e $P f e oll!1 4 J. "The author of this singular and talen . , te eta sider', th.,,,, - ,,,g0 fled medical man, who has evidently luta riog O ceane vili„:lo,;,‘ the trr xtment of the various disorders a vi .,,,, 0 ' 1,., re , k w frailties of early indiscretion. The engre ;'7 esce, o 4 Pi t 10 ° dition, by demonstrating the corisetinenCe,,taritY.,lpll,3l s:,‘ act as a salutary warning to youth and I', 0 , el , oft' il. many toothquestins may be satisfactorily reP 1 ,; ...... " vs s, _,,resi 6 o jefr'ri peal, eves e most con fi dential friend. b, : i a t ; a r r en:i Published by the Author, and IneY o b_e . :ie ..rse l lps l ..e; i f :r Ol, from Kent am' Richards, 52, Paternoster- 0 ,,,.,,,1r5tn,t, 0 Oxford-street. Starie, Tichborne- street' jc ura pl"' 0 1", Leadenhall-street, London; Newton , 16, ' lll 6o up 0 # and by all Booksellers. ~,, Nin B ,l 1 t At Home for Consultation dailf , Five till Eight ; and all letters irurned!'" the fee of If ., for advice, kc.-2 BFP F°Iti) ll' SQUARE. LONDON AO ) I,IF . ifr „, T,fl. - , , (P l ' k A POPULAR TREATISE on the H.f• c iiiol 4 ,•=l Ivo' i c4' of the BODILY F UN ~, Free d ~, f NINETEETH EDITION, price 28 . ew e , i ; ..reaic , ,, , , Envelope) 35- e"" A pi tot f,,,,,,,v THE SILENT FRIEND. , 4 "' off, ~tri,,7o!, ',, on the loss of the reproductive powe';':oeiti7"ol, 0 4. tlon. The baneful effects of Indulgencee'd o ut , , 0 .. z, , f;i• condary Symptoms, ace., are fully Poin t y a rrisg ' A r l e o> graviings ; followed by observations on - c i ro 1 t 1": ip,,, , PERRY and Co., Consulting Surgeons , I t ' ° POI 5 ,, 1 1th 0 , " ,4 Published by the Authors, and Mai -- Gorap . ,,lC, o 0 . ,. Sold by Strange, No. 21, Paternoster •reig a nsf,r., A rsiro '''o street; Purkis, Compton-street, Sohe; m . O O -- iteo.d t. ; 0 . ,.. 1 , S•, street, and 37, Ro3 al Exchange ; and '''', ( jdre ,s- t orctti ' , Part I. of this Work is particular l l, - ,,,0ce , ,,„ - ole ." ''; ' 4 prevented from forming a Matrimonial /" a s' 10 .. " ,D 0.4) lain disqualiacations, and will be found 9" to m s dr ets' 0 the means of perfect and secret restoration woo 0 .40, ,ii Part 11. treats perspicuously upon ti , i().' „ l' ¢ fr .° :ine lf ~,' ihnowthenirupnirbimergarywohrosenceogrlieedatrytostiabtetai, n ar.: o ` . o3 - 4 , el a ci ' olye a voi ? j ;: , upon themselves years of misery and 11,1fier .d 16 es,.; I. W ,,, e fof • The CORDIAL BATH OF SYRIACv, - „eole', j i,s%'").ll , the cure of nervous and sexual ' debility, " i - ptic i ; sr 04 renness, loss of appetite, Indigestion, co pre 1.-. , 'eV tie. t sy i eps syphilitic arisinguT t l i l e e Fl remedyfromv e - Five-pound f e l o n i r'cle searching excess es, e c s h m i g a c ' 1 " '. 'cll $ I . c**; C • I' # I *j a m u l d na t t h l os on e , p sc a u ,n rv f y i , ulcerations, n ereal a et The CONCENTRATED DETFIisSl"ri g ust t h e A, f o o rc, ' nta u affe "tent, secondarysympto . , „ N ina). - v, „oi 4 and 338. per bottle Ins, and all ' , n rice, ori',y, fiamrnation, irritation of e ril ,l; ' 4.9 111 O r O r PERRY'S PURIFYING SPECIFIC , re ale ~,,s1 ,d 4 ' i and I Is. per box, are th . t effectusi., pi , at c. , ,, , ,,' business, Consultation fee, if by t L mh e e :t yb e bo r lbu:cla . ttl:l7lll:o/11 ' 1!e1. 4 :1$ : itil o ire°5.411:4:: : ji' ¢ta ll:-.4::':.'"::''::'; i piPl it : o' o o l c i e2B , s H ar enter M s- eB str s e rs it, P O e x il lo y r, a l- r s e t r i e n e t a , allll,ll(7 ii f r ilit'llelle. five till eight; and on Sundays from efeve Norfolk etl-1 _.--- '' - rsoir „c o Pt ovo / 4"! contribution lif ~),000/ p t a o n w y ar I the ere° •Iof e'• al -i l rt i c t j a t i 1 waCom EXTENSION e ITS oot ed n( 00 . pre.- .0- laallet new church, Norfolk Sli ti ll' v lO r i • , ..-0 0 tatikfil Ii EMIGRATION TO AMEBIC', ber% 0 ; 10 , r the New York packet -ship Northu tn poe'i i l i i wold commander, left the yipLona°l/c, geottotd sengers on board and a cargo of s ettl e 0 0:0 7 tin. The emigrants, who intend V....ec1 01) jc7,01 4 States, are principally farmers anc" P t ,nke n . a na r 0 and the metropolis. The ship was to ‘, 0 steamer. and was enabled to reaeu - r e go o,j tog e. , mrnenced. A . f e doi g o r il l i e d WANTON MISCHIEF ''''''' --W 0 1 ti ll t ' r chymist at Maidenhead, was quietlistljetoploi) avocations at home, when be v " s kitig r A ° hearing a violent crash, and on loo viiiv iew - 0 9 ,4 that one of the large plate•glass br olte lj ' l ot i of the value of seven pounds , w a ? ve d 0 P j 3 oo l o i ff # instantly to the door, he rr eel t . - it, 0 11 0 : 1 )060 / , i ' respectably dressed, standing nee iet terhed ')5 who had broken the window , th,,b o s b e l t/ V e , near the spot) at once adtnittea 1.. 4 , „st/, order that he might be sent toe r!...;0(10/000,Zi was given into custody, and th "00 0 94 Mr. C. Williams, for two month% 01 000 or c. , rrespondent suggests that rout tbeeofocp v i A meat should be inflicted, to pre e bo o° . f o r ,r, ll outrages of such miscreants. 'l; h oire l b ee o or medy than that which is adopteu, hbot ir A 0: 0 ,0 day violence, where the whole ney oet 10P indemnify the injured party og' 0 4 impossible to guard against' As se. 4 0 0°11 ") pool , DISTRESSING ACCIDENTP--(305, s i ior 6 , r were fishing for whiting on M° a ..., re aTto 0 4 Bay, near where the steamers l e boa_ o ile .d 0 party got on the mast-head ofhol'uoebehrett brie while another was getting ja,_ t t he 64 , 0 0 P P 4 1 0 / upset. Three were saved uy oat II- 0 fo l o tv # 4 11) ors arts 1 bay, but the fourth, Sarnue. - a t r e - hi- / son, butcher, was drowned. _"• . ', 0 3 for , steady youth, and so much resPet`olo tow' .. , 0 4 attention to business, that the t in . 05, 1 untimely end. 'vOt e leP r of• 1 , Pr' ai lkl 4 , SIR THOMAS MITCHESITrP"-Tboto._: optolitli received on Saturday from 0 n evotbe 4 . April 19; but they contain !I eve n _ 1 . 4 ifv o y i/ have not been able to ascertsitithe lo be q 6 ) longitude of his camp wh el l 0 of he t a. : d o / Ile had received the dispntu"edes ret d e r In i, giving an account of Leichhof ob jects i o dir ,/./ considers one of the prineir l u l te t o 0 ° f lOl to be to trace a practicable ens n. el) ." 4 1 0 , f d i l, Sydney Morning Herald, JuneilEoVe:soolL ,4 [A DVERTISEM ENT.] AL L 0 .0 0 t of4 AND APOPLECTIC SYMPTOMS INfla i :loge r : ofkl o r nor, WAY'S PlLLs.—There is ofteat rouch w heo o , o o o ,cOl„/ // , attruks of paralysis or apopleS3%,., Ott , 0 011 0 110 ,1// symptoms hang about the systenlo"..,,,,at ~.,ja f 0 9 state of things indicates much deraolgro-rporotrost;hif, i and clearly demonstrates a great wa i l t r o to"I t , jil t this is the case, not a mom out shon 01 ~ t 10 , 1 0,0 0 3 0 0, doses of these celebrated Pa% w set Orrigtil bowels and ston,ach, while the," to it s P so il , " orals, and thus restore the blood , Or o rlk Professor Holloway's F,stablishnielirrowetl all medicine sellers throng t he e 0 -------_ — ___-_-- - , - , s 000;a1Vi ll e t t i Blia ll e ' 0 01 11 of _ILA 10 the Se i g n he n ' P" .0 . 01t On the 9th ult., at Canadao On the E 2 as 6 t t , i t i h o e f lady' juiyo,f oalt fiisOer,cCuvllisdaePriraito4;oo6,6lll ico,i' wife of Captain Thomas Ditllla i : vo icle O P O. On the 28th ult., at Me a id, of o 9 11/. Il e "V Gla , gow, Mrs. David Macdonaf sr. j, 10 ..1, , On the 30th ult., the wife ° . ~, lin,,Ofiloff, tors'-cominons, solicitor, of a VlZire.roeu..,,hte;o4forsi, On the 30th ult., at 'llevens,',,iii dagrilel' , Mrs. Hugh Lennox Mortimer e a r c t"org li oll _ g ot I " On the 31st ult., at HarnPete s treet' Y O r' ' On the 31st ult. , in Lowndes- e e oltt' I V) Bridges Taylor, of a sell- s rober il '' V ll l On the 31st ult. , in Upper i SO ,4° Salt, Esq., of a daughter. ~A 6411; 1 11„ ° O p t; C b arle lit'4e atti ..l4 '" On the 31st ult., 0 Is-ens'-.lgelcoe• - 5 ir-ylpi. Woodward, Esq., to Adore Dla): , . in gtee' o ver i osktO r r ot r. ur g e' :Ot t/ 0 0° A , e N e V i O o i l t l i c t i i n t t s o l; i e i S e 31: Shaftesbury ult„ at a l o t i f S ° S a e •-•:' n ell :; , : o f t :1 ' a n i t i; . : a l t li v til g j 1 r : o f , 9 1 / 1/ the South Division of the sarui'ate Mr viipil i i DI ED. rab ild ' ) 144, ) t SecOL, cle itl ol ')o 4 ~ft surviving (laughter of the . hest ( o On the 24th August, a Elibennat,hteh 2e6mlllfenoift .C , a a p t t u ti pt i ai n rerds T osAi l ut i a ;p n ir, i l t e;, os 7:; l3 ;f ' o6 of O li oji., : liii ; ,btoef co" Ira tit of liugh Ba rn ett, Esq. Crir-V int ' Ore ° iii On the 29th ult., a t . . Kinefoanntn,tattigllaeeud2g96ht7th,erist.f,Pithiteclhile.nikdioaor..gpiireoigibteid,:teoo:o, ;:iiilli On the 20th ult., Ann I;.„igli i r As, 000 t L h i en (RI ue:. of i:Gro:n.vvr , t hoirtae - t : el r .n a c i y e .. 00 ;e , e t r o ~.,,. : ‘,l, f On the 29th ult.. On the 31st ult., at 1if.r.nia.„,..,,,,ge ~,,,,,::00, i Lour 'Tinted and 1' ~,0 01 0 0 ,: i fixof ff Strand, Printer, Al. The _'o'.oty of 1 1, the late ___ , Colone l itr°bertb;:iv I :,;_i ii ______ :i _ ll) : it iiiiii) ,_ , -- - 0,610 - 0 0 : o r i p of the Savo'. In the . roger 4, 18461 __.