The Sun. — London, England, 1812-02-25 00:00:00

Resottitions of that Home. Acting as he had ael:s.d, he bad taken a middle course, than which he !stew not how he CO Id [ratio taken a oettvr. ETF:iintorr stlmtly supoll , d "In- gram. Mt - . BATHURST thought the sun', hich had been usual ) , voted for the (Alice in question ought still to btied till the otii,-e was ab4•l'sned. He therefore rthon;d:v..te in I.lvour of the grant, wir.out giving ho...ever, that he should vote-for the con tinuance of the office 'itself, when ;hat question came to be discussed. He thought Govelitment might p.iy too ::tuck attention to such subjects, and at nditig to them, neglect savings of greater im portance. • _ . M , ..Al‘DoNAtn was of opinion that the grant went to tt.iow otioquy on the Government of his Royal Highness the Prince Regent, and that, Low. rt,r vairrol ;t .as not for Paaliament to eontirm nt. 11 i gall', scrificing their duty, and r - iterests of the country, personal feelings and tale , t; Mt. Moa Errs said, he could find no Resolution for the, onytaiiti t , d ion of sinrcnres; and the of fice under discussion at preseot• was even, by the ackno‘A led t ,ineut of the Right Hon. Gentleman on the floor, not so area, of a sinecure as others.— 'Ebert. .were at present above twelve hundred per sons ..t - t this fond. fie mould al:ow . ; that it was an establishment which ought to be regulated ; but the grant was inn .e in such a way as to I,:y it open to those c•rnditions. Right Hon. Gentleman was, in his opi ion, fulin, tos!ifie , ,t in making the grant unzler suci clrcutnstances. The question was not wire; her there existed any clamour out of dbors on this subteet, but whetter such clamour Was 'well or ill founded; of w L.ll founded, it was cowardice to yield, a cd.wareiice which might excite the 'eon temp. of the people, though it never could win their confidence. - Mr. HoMe SUMNER did not .i4leo in the opinion that toe mode of rewarding servi, es should he esta blished before the abolition of sinecures took plact ; on the contrary, he was of opinion that the siee cures should be abolished immediately ; the reward of meritorious public servants would certainly be provided for, and might without any condition be entrusted to Parliament. , Mr. W. FITZGERALD sari, he hardly thought it fair in the Hon. Gentleman who just sat down, to call upon the House to agree to the Resolution all along alluded to upon an understanding of his own. He was surprised that' his Right Honourable Friend (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) could be ex pe6„ted.to come down to the House with an inlet'. tion to abolish the grant in question, especially when be recollected t.tis was a reward for services per formed, while the Han: Gentleman opposite (Mr. M'Donald) enjoyed a sinecure from the time that lw was as school-boy. Another Right Hon Gen tlemau (Mr. Banks), he thought, would have none . well to do justice to the motives of his Right Hon. Friend, and justice ;;e h ! (.1 not done them, when he gOppi,sed that the objeet wi ft which he had recom wettJed to the nitree It ii, the appoini!l,eo: of Officer, was that 0f divldolz the otiloipty w: icli must an. a iipon the tiletlre. He believed that lttsßi g h: Friend was the only Minister who had Lot recomincnled otlices in reversion. An H n. tit-oiltmati Tierney) had used an ex res,..on on a lorrner night, wloci:, he believed, he ou',,t riot again br; inclHeo to repeat he ha, dinged Ministers with chaing the, Prince Ittgtut throo 6 n tiediet; but oierlaoking the c, i pression, and corm g to the argument that it uas inht:ting to the Piicce, to Parliament, tk) the ItidiViLltl.A sho was presented with the once, he must s. ,v to time first place, that he was -of alto& L.er inclined - to adopt the inter pretaton of these :o 'were ioo much in the habit of oalstdering t_nemselves the i.; , .f•lusive legislators of the country. As to its being insulting to the Prince Regent to advise the rewarding -an Hon. Officer, wh?) -bac: long ati,i faitaully served him, he could riot comprehend it, nor did he think it'any nisult to l'arlntment to presume !ha; Parliament was not the source , of reward ; as far was it from insult to the individual to remunerate his services. The motion" ul the Hon. Gent. was not u healer they would de em& 20001. from the Wicows' Pension List, but whether they would mark with their: disapprobation the first step of his Royal Highness in favour of a deserving servant. Mr. M'DJNALD, in explanation, said, that though he ileld a swecure office, he was ready to give it up at any time in which a regulaliOn should be made on the subject, and he would assure the Right Ho nourable I, , qct of the Treasury, notwithstanding the unassuming manner to which he had addressed him, that-tie should never be prevented by 'the pOs sesnon of any place, from doing his duty to his con sti uents. Mr: W.-FITZGER ALD said he imputed no political or moral guilt to the holding of a sinecure office, but lie thought, that in his general declaration on that tkuhie. - 1, the Hon. Gent. seemed to overlook the eir -tuinstance of having heldone. WiLnEavoacE deprecated the principle of supposing that a i\lembet of Parliament who held a vrICCLITe pkett, was not competent to deliver his tan opinion on the Ftibie.ct. He remembered the ,appointment of the Commissioners who had recom mended the , abolition of this office; id thirteen years atter.vards, when it arrived at double the Va.- hue, the people felt it. The great point in his mind was, t!;at there was something in the nature of the office which rendered it more liable to public obloquy than any other, as it was often con ks! leced in the light of a dectection from the WI- dotes' Pensions. In times of peculiar pressure, like . the present, they should lighten the vessel of the State. Fie knew the pure and honGurable mind of his Right Hon. Friend (the Chancellor of the Ex chequer), but. regretted that he dim not seem - par kct ly aware how necessary it was upon some sub jects to guard against misconstruction, and particu larly to wipe away such blots as this., He ,(Mr. Wilberforce) would rather have penSiOns than things of this kind, which could only be defended - by the merits of the individual. He must allow Colonel MsiVlahon merits, atter all that he had heard, but they were such as the House could not take cog, cizance of; and if such a principle were to be acted upon, there was no knowing to what extent they might be carried by it. Lord CASTLEREAGH thought that the Resol ition via: very far from containing any thing which NirtmA controul or bind the Parliament, but it was_ right it should obtain consideration and respea. Parlia ment did not appear to him to have intended it for the dirthion of the Executive Government, but as a ;zeeral rule for their own body, which they had fol lowed up by the appointment of a -Conimitiee on the subj,e6t. He thought it most unjust to expe& grorn his Right liOn. friend that, he should point out the offices to.which the principle applied ; that was the business of Parliament itself. The subjed should not be treated in an unparlilmentaty man ner, nor should the individual bedeptived of elm); lumeot. Without giving any opinion as to the pro , pr or impropriety of sinecures, he should oppose the motion. Mr. BANES General TARLETON said he knew the Colonel for thirtysfive years, and knew him to be an estima ble man. He thought it unfair that he'should be now placed in a situation which drew upon him the obloquy of the House and of the public. It was not the proper reward for, his military or civil services. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he would make but a few obsenations, having already stated his opinions on the sUbjed in the Committee. The Hon. General seemed to think that bad ail ed an unfair and unhandsome part by Col. iVl'Ma bon, in appoeiting him to the office of Paymater of Widows Pensions. For his par: he 'was at a loss to discover any hardship in the case, as Col. M‘Mahon 'was perfectly at liberty to refute the office. But there mtght be something unkind in appointing Gentlemen to situations which he was not aware of. His Ho nourable Friend (Mr. Banks) fad visited his in dignation on Ministers for . daring to advise etbe Crowe on the instance, now urZier discussion. All he could say was, that from his conversa sations with his Honourable Friend on tint sub jeel, beethought he had dune that which by a sort of compel with him, he was bound to do.— The Member tosAroi kshire had thought differently, and expressed his regret at the part which Govern ment had taken ; but if he (the Chancellor of the Exciequer thank with him, that ail the danger _of the country arose from sinecures, be should have tided a wrong part not to have advised their abOli lion as they dropped, but being diredly of the op posite opinion, and thinking that there was more danger in the declamations on those offices than in the offices themselves, he thought it his duty to leave the whole argument to,Parliament. His Right Hon. Friend, who always voted consisteetly, he thought, was rather inconsistent in the )reseto in stance. He 'wishes that all should be 1,41 to Par liamenteand yet that the Minister shouldi roerfere ; out sshatliad he done to 'preclude the consideration any ousrelnanif the granehad not been made at all ? *lsere was another point on which he wished to ascertain the le.ling of Parliament. His Hon. Friend had brought forward Resolutions which he (ihe Chancellor of the Excheqeer) had opposed, but whiCh . were carried. Was lie to consider those resolutions as binding, and was he actually to pro ed he abolition of such offices himself ? With iegard to the other resolutions, and to the reports, be wished to know hew long a resolution was to be considered binding at law which was not acted on in the mean time ? He should think, that so far from its long standieg being in its favour, the parlia- Mereary influence was direetly the contrary ; for if the resolution was forined twenty years ago, why shotald - not a bill haVe been brought in to direct the abolition, as in other places ? Instead of draw ing an argnment from the length of time, they should be led to suspect there was an indis position in Parliament to carrying them into effed. But it seemed that he ought to have granted the office to some former_ connedion of his. He should say that he ought to grant it to the person most fitted to have it, and he conceived clearly that 11 the law admitted of a -grant of-this de ierietion, there was hardly an ottice to which the Individual was more entitled than that. It was an unconsitutional doctrine to maintain until it passed into a lasv, that services should be rewarded by .Par liament and not by the Crown. For the advice be had given he was pettedly responsible, but be could not agree with some Gentlemen that there was any thing disrespedful in this debate to the feelings of Colonel M‘Mahon e Entertaining the opinions he had already delivered, be had ads ised the Crown to make_ the grant as.a proper reward for faithful services. Mr. WHITBREAD declared that he had never heard a sarcasm more misplaced than that with which the Right Hon. Gentleman commenced his speech, and in justice to his Hon. and Gallant Friend, he must say, that he had never known a more conscientious proceeding than that on which the Right [ion. Gen tleman had attempted to fix so unjust an odiuM. The present question was one of a very different nature. As it regarded the individual concerned, nothing was more evident than that a feeling would exist different from, that which would have been excited had any other individual person been the subjea of discussion. If the Right Hon. Gentle man should have a majority of votes on the ques tion (which fie Mr. W. doubted), the public would be fully aware of the influence which the considera- tion tfiat Colonel AVlVlabon was the personal fa vourite of the Regent, must have occasioned in the decision. A Noble .Lord, who he had expected wool] have spoken from the lower benches, had charaelejised the amendment as unparliamentary. Their opinions differed on this . point. For hi; pact, he conceived that the Crown possessed many pre rogatives, which were adually controlable by Par liament. The Crown possessed the prerogative of making war, but it rested with Parliament to grant the necessary • supplies. The' Crown pos sessed the prerogative of appointing, a Paymas ter of Widows' Pensions, but it rested with Par- liament to ratify such an appointment, by voting a salary, the Right Hon.' Gentheman contended, that because Parliament had not followed up the re ports of the Commissioners of 1783, and of the various Committees, by some legislative proceeding, that they thereby gave a silent negative to the re commendation contained in those reports. Thus it appeared that Ministers, having by their dexterity defeated in -the House all those measures which every body out of the House declared would- hive been_ generally beneficial, when it came to a pinching vote, on such a question as the present LONDON : Printed by 7 HOMAS WOOD, of No. 3S, Maiden-lane, Covent-gar,fen; a n , At the SLIN POICB, No, 112, gtpatip 'Olen averliwnents ) Oftier endeavoured to persuade the douse_ to agree with them, lest Parliament should incur the ; impu tation of inconsistency. This argument was most unfounded. When The report of the Commis sioners of 1783 was made, the interest of two persons was . vested. in this place. The present was the very period when the public might have begun to derive benefit from its abolition.- -The Right Hon. Gentleman had very improperly taken credit to himself for having told Colonel INl'Malion that he must hold the situation subje& to the pleasure of Parliament. How could he avoid this ? the Regent had conferred the place for life it would, have .been the duty of Parliament in stantly to interfere. But in what way did the Right Houourable Gentleman follow - this intimation to Colonel M'lNlalion ) "Why, by . using .all his pre ponderating influence to preva'l on Parliament to confirm the grant. It might re asked, why not make this grant ? because it was not decent to _the House of Commons to do so. It was true that a small ma j,rity of the House had decided agaiust carrying the Reports of the various Commi:tees into effe , l in the shape of law.. • The Right Boni GentlemHn was accustomed to small majorities. He had even, , continued Minister against a majority. Whether he would base a majority on th,! present ,r cca•ton— what would be his future tale--Jihat ‘Aould be th.e fate of his colleagues—Ahether they would form a Cabinet j4rring differing on all the vital' ques- tions of th E - a - I,,ire—whetfier this Cabinet. would hold a single common principle, or whether, on the contrary every Member of it vrouli be scrambling •to maintain his own opinion ? Tuese a ere questions which time would solve. But it would• have been the duty of the Right Hon. Gentleman 'at least to advise the Regent—at least to suspend the grant. He must know, tkat the source from whirl: it flowed 'was obnoxious to the people. Had the 27001. been voted among the [6,000 persons, who, having lost their natural protectors, were the ob jects of the . fund,, the public feeling 'would have been gratified, and the call . of humanity would have been obeyed. Were there no other offices which would have been fit for Colonel M , Mation ? Was there not an office, lucrative and honourable, at that moment vacant in tha! Hou se, which had been held by a distinguished Officer, recently deceased Why not give that office to Colonel M‘Mahon ? But even if the Prince Regent had been tenacious on the subje6t, and had set his heart upon the ap pointment, a good Minister, would have freely re presented to him how obnoxious such an, appoint ment as that under discussion must be in the eyes of the people. , This appointment had indeed stamp ed the-charader of the new reign. From the pie sent moment to the latest period . of the life .of the individual now exercising the Sovereign Authority, it would be remembered. The Regent would ever have to lament thit he had had a Minister why had so misconceived his duty to his Royal Highness and to the public, as to advise his Royal Highness to do that, the memory of which would never pass away, even were his reign to proye.longer than that of his revered father. Mr. SHERIDAN admitted, that if it were expeEled hat the people should proceed with passive to, titude to bear the burthens necessarily imposed upon them, an example most be set by the highest authority, ofd di , po:ition to abolish &l unnecessary drai►:s on the resources of the country. Still, However, be must think that a great deal of warmth bad pervaded the present-discussion, which did not properly be- long to it. The place in question had certainly been condemned thirty years ago, as an useless sine cure, by a very respectable Commission. That con. demnation had been since confirmed b) Committees of the House of Cominons. But he must agree with the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite, that as no Parliamentary proceedings had followed the Re ports of those Committees, the Right Hon. Gentle man would not have been authorised to say the place onght,not tO have been given. He lamented that the tone of his Hon. Friend who 11:la just spoken, seemed to have been changed with respect to Col. M'Mahon. Although there had been many obje:- tions.made to the grant itself, yet until the speech of his Hon. Friend, no objection had bee)" adduced against the person on whom the grant was con ferred. His Hon. Friend also accused the Right Hon. GentlemSo of selecting that person, with the view of gaining an undue influence, by humouring an undue prepossession on the part of his Royal Highness in favour of Colonel M'Mahon. He knew nuth'ng of the motives of those who adviSed the R - gent on this subject ; but he. confessed, that he doubted whether his Hon, Friend really believed that such was their Object. He certainly did think i hat' the place ought Co have, been abolished; and he sincerely wished "that Colonel M'Mahon had never accepted it. But the present proceeding appeared to him to be nujust and unfair. Why not bring for ward a direct motion against the place, and not make a proposition which seemed to be as much direded against Col. M'Mahon as the office ? With respeat to, Colonel M'Mahon, no one had enjoyed a better opportunity of knowing that Gentleman man than himself, and he was persuaded, that a more sincere, a more disinterested, artd more inde pendent wan, was no where to be found. Even in ihelprestri s t question, Col. MlNlahon had no interest; for it was not to be supposed that if the decision of Parliament compelled him . to relinquish the util.e conferred upon him, his Royal Master would tail to !mullet-ate his faithful services in some other way. Mr. WEITERgAD, in explanation, distlaimed passing the slightest amputation on Colonel hon. On the contrary, he had pointed out a lucra tive and honourable office which in his opinion might have been with propriety conferred on thai Gentleman. His Right Hon. Friend had mistaken his obserYations on influence. What he had said was, that the yutes of that House .wonld be mote influenced by the consideration that Colonel :M 'Ma- lion was the person filling the obnoxious situation, than they would have been, had any other individual been so circumstanced. Lord COG/MANE expressed his decided opinion against the great mass of sinecure places and pen sions ; 'but as he thought it invidious to select this particular instance, be would not vote for the Amendment. At the same time, as be could not bring his mind to support the Right Hon. Gentle man oppobite, he had determined to quit the House, a nd abitain from voting altogether. The tictise then divicled— Vor the Amendly.ent tr;' • - Against it _ _ 1,2 Majority The remaining Resolutions v.rere sei=eralfy agreed to. 'Mr. BAN-KES gave notice, that on Tuesday, , 4 1, e r, - th of March, he would submit to the House a proposition for carrying into effea the Resplutiont of the Coin mission of ItB3. On the motion of Mr. BitouottAyr, - anaccount was ordered to be laid before the House, of tyre number pf CoMmercial Licenses granted for the ten; years, ending the sth of January, 1812; distin guishing the number in each month during the last three years; as also those granted for Exports, from those granted ("or ImportS, Btc.. The other Orders of th e Day , were then dhposed of, and the Hone adjourned. 111RTI1S. On Thursday the 13th inst. at Bennington 'Park, FlertF7,- the Lady of t..harles Montzumery Campbell, Esq. of a San. On'Saturday last, in Montague square, the Lady of ail Hon. Lieutenant-Colonel Brand, of a Daughter. On Sunday last, at his house•at West Mailing, the Lady of William Bowles, Fsq.. of a Daughter. MARK lED., On Saturday last, at St Mary's, Newington, Mr. W. D. Slater_ only 59n or Michael Slater, Esq. o f -W a l wort h, td Miss 13ess Wheeler Thring, only child and daughter of lohn Thring, Esq. of the New -Kent-road, and niece of Frederia. Gibson, Esq. of the Customs. The same day, at Petersham, Surrey, R. T. Moore, Esq. of Portsmouth, to Mary Ann, daughter of the late William Backhouse,. Esq. of Devonshire-street, Queen-square. DIED 130 Quartets at 13os od I '59 --- at rz6s od at tz4s cci at 123 s cd at izts cc I at 121 s od I at tas od 1 at 4,175' c d $ 2 9 593' Zo7 65 ---- 7 At 1136 od 48c, ...-----... at 112 s cd 199 --...---. at L I !. , S od I 07 .- at itos od Total 7375 Quarters. oN. 94. higher th 112 213 81 236 SEEDS PRICE OF St. James's Martet 4s. loci. Clare Alarket 4s. to::. Alarket 4s. per stone of Stb. t 4 . Average price 45.. 9til • Yellow Soap, gas.—Mot Palm Price of Candles per dozen, Published by WI I LIAM ARM IGER SC RI PI'S, South Mutton-street; Gmiveror-square, or l'apqr, Letters tor the Editor, s‘:c. (post-paid), 1111:15t Lc ucidsesed., On the 15th inst. at Loughrea, Mrs. Daly, wife of Arthur Henry Daly, Esq. % She, was dauOter of the H,n. PaJl Gore, and Cousin of the Nlarquis of Abercorn and the Earl of A r ran. On Thursday last, after a most painful and lingering i ill. Hess, Mr. Josiah tienshall, sea. of Wardour•street, agea 57 yeass. - On the zoth inst. at Beaconsfield, in his 86th year, Robert Crook, Esq, nearly co years an inhabitant of that place. On the 2 in t. Augustus Lesage, Esq. of Craven-place, Kentish-Town, aged 77. On Sunday, in Spring•garden, after an bour's Fanny, youngest daughter of Pascoe Grentell,. E. M. P. aged two years. The some day, at Clapham, 111 r. Samuel Franks, SoU.., citoi', Hart -street, Bloomsbury. HIGH WATlilt AT LONDON BRIDGE "CD -MOR ROW. Morning, 57 min. after I. Evening, zz min. after 2. LONDON MARKETS, Sec. RETURN OF WIIF.AT IN MARK-LANE, By Messrs. Cnitn and MALrAs, Induding only from Feb. to, to Feb. Is. Agreeably to the A. 563 Quarters at lAS 0(t 134 at 107 S od 443 ---- tc6; od .5 2 4 63 237 230. 141 -at loos od 4g9 • at 98s c 4 73 221 at '4ls oci. 24 , 1 --- at 905 cAI 500 st. bas ed. 10 at, ass C —Average top.. In last Rolm,. RETURS'OF FLO From Feb. 8, to Feb. 15. Front the Sacks, s. d. Sacks. s. to too o to 916 12 ! 73 , • 95 0 4tt 901 2 76 ---- 94 0 83 91 o 54 1 —93 0 1 rS37 —9O 0 1 Total— z 5,963 Sacks. —A verage is. 9111. higher than last r ket..(7lfice. s. d. 4 2 - Rq • is SS Li 20 - A 7 4 2 S) • t. iyer Sack. return Red Clover (new) - - - —s. Soc. to r3os. cwt. Oil ditto - . --s. 4 .',, to tons. White ditto . -- , —s. to ps. tsos. do-- R ye-f;rp.,:s - .. - —3. 2,85. to cos. quarter. Turnip , White -.- —s. 20S.' t , / 28s. od. bi;sll... Red and Green - - 265. od. to 3os. White Mustard Seed - los. cd. to 14s. od. Brown ditto - - igs. od. to 225. od. do. Carra way seeds - - 655. od. to 7os. od ~. Coriander do. . - 355. rd to 4 s. Cinque Foin - -70 s. cd. to 6os. per qr. Trefoil - - - —s. 20S. to 70S. per cwt. Cooky - - - - 755. to S o s. o d . per qr .. Oil Cake at the Mill, 171. 175. per thousa..d. • UXBRIDGE. Corn-Inspeaor's Return.—. THURSDAY, FE.B. 20. Wheat,pr,ld. 231. los top'. iss Beans - s3s od to 63E oti New do. —J. cs to-1. os Rye - —s od to -sod 13ariey,per. qr. 46s act to sss od Pease -58 s od to 64s ad 0.a5 345 od to 41s od I PRICE OF HOPS. um BAGS. NEW POCKETS. Kent, 41. os. to 51. us. Kent, 4!. Jos. to 61 iss. Sussex, 31. 155. to 51. ss. Sussex, 41. los. to 61. os. Essex, 41. los. to 51. 1 zs. Farnhamool.'os. to ktl. os. PRICE -------- OF LEATHER (per lb.) AT LEADENHALL Butts; so to 561 b. each - 210. to 241. Ditto, s 6 to 661 b. each ' - - 251. to .26d. Merchants' 13acki, - • - 2011. to z?.:1. Dressing Ilides - - - t 71.1. to iSid. Fine Coach Hi des, - - -19 d. to 1964. Crop Hides, 35 to 4olb. for cutting -17 d. to 591. Ditto, 4S to solb. - , - tgl. to ltd. Calf Skins, 3o to 401 b. 281 L to 3zil. per lb. Ditto,' so to 701 b. 36d. to 44(1. per lb. Ditto, 70 to 801 b. 36d. to 4011. per lb. Sinai! Seals (Greenland) 335. od. to -s. od. per lb. Large ditto, - izos. to 17os. pe'r dozen. Goat Skins - 345. to 625. per ditto. Tainted Horse ):-fideS ' I7d. god. • RAW II I DES. Best I leiters & Stecrs,(per st.) Ordinary 23 nd to xs. 41. 3s 41 to 33 tid Maricct, Calt 17s ad.-each Middlings. 3s a l to 3s 21 Etig.HOrie 13:3 0(1. to iis 0(i. Sheep Skins - -36 d. to 6od. I , IIIIVGA FE AND I.EADENtiALL By the Carcase. Peet - 45. od. to ss. 4d. VeA ss. oil. to 75, sal. Mutton 4s. od. to is. 4d. I Pori: 5,, od, to 6s. 81. __— TA L LOW , Town Tallow 82s. —s. Yellow Russia —s. Whit:: do. 745. od. -s. od. Soap do. 7 2, . od. Stuil 645. od —s. Ditto moo 4os. od• 435. Graves zos. od. Good Dregs 9S. od. puled, zo2s.—surd, ro6s. 3 925. 13s. t4s. t. St. lAMLS's HAY MARt.E,T, 1 - En. 24. Hay, 31. 3s. od. to 51. 175. od.—Aver'. 41. lob. 6d. Straw; 21. s. Sod. to P. 63. od.—Aver. Zl, 17g. 6,1. ‘VIIITECHAVEI, HAY MARKET. flay 41. 4s. to 61. 6s."od.— Aver. 51. ss. Clover til. 6s. od. to 71. 7s. od.—Aver. 61.165..6d. Straw al. to 21. Os. ca.—Aver. at. z is. od, COAL MARKET, Fa.a. 24. Ships at Market. Ships sold. Price. 59 Newcastle . .3o . 4os. ad. to 535. od. Sunderland • • Si . 425. od. tO 445. 6d. I Stood Coal . i . sss. cd. jo —s. ad. 2 Cinders . L . . v 585..0d. to —s. od.