The Sun. — London, England, 1829-05-16 00:00:00

I I ~'~ oL- ...e...-K.,...,) ,tt-5 4-_-_,-,e_ef__-, ... .„ . . . . T., . . ~. .., • , . i,... H 44 .2 ., ,, ::),„, ~., , ,•!, ,, .”..r-, ,,-- ): , i'llo - , . I •k^t.tn ..,,,- e'''' l lll'. l " , / .3. , 4 , ' . ' - • ---....,,,,,,...../ - 11% , 7. - '- - :; - c - _ „..9i, ''' ghNS• shk 7 ,' ' - i V *.vipe W . ~,,,. 0.17 - - --77,4111 Pf, - - 77,4111 Pf, ilk-",,,..• .- •,.. mici), il- -- k""Ri'"A4' •was , . -- 1.- - Enk, ~,',,, .':V i .10 II , , •'t C I &?-- I AP t 7I-- --.---- • - - ---:-...: '"i'i / . 1 . , ; ' .• ~ . .'-, V IT lep rp44L, . .., , -,--: -..ll4 ztuvol ;- - ':, S . *" • , ~ :ip , :tit la , . ... 4. - -' - ' . I. ,liitckle 21, -b::,, ,, y,,:ii , t , . lii sjo vtlf, _ _ __ CTS.frOit . wa s AND CANDLES. -cmil lusAMAT DEPA RTIHE NT TREASURY ) CHIMISERM S''AY 12, 1829. S:UCH ERSONS. asp are desirous of Con -4 :47acting!rith,,tite Agent for Commissariat S Ipplics, Ifflth!it for Tl " l l l agonths, from the 2.5 th of jns next, ( 'Pk1 : 4 1 14 1 2 *in of COALS an d . CANDLES as may from ~!j 41 .4 1 . ' e . be Fe wired, f or sundry Eatracks and. Stations „ !mentioned Counti es and Islands, may receive —.cluati 4 42 Coniaan4 . 6n zipplking at this Office be of Ten and Four ; and to the respective "" 77 0faaters •in•the Islands of Guerns e y, Jers e y, and follo !•itsid et ., 43 , 6 , and• deliver . their' Tende rs a t thi s Office, as w s , „ Tiludert ibr4ttpplyiiig! Coals, 'sealed up, and marked until Twelve o'clock on TUESDAY, eft eaders ~`°r Supplying ` Candles, sealed up and marked Candles," until Twelve o c l oc k on T HURSDAY butbut'no piopcisal, either for Coals or Candle's, noticed, unless made on, or annexed to, a printed And- the Price* inserted in Words at length ; Letter be subjoined to such Proposal from two inloWn Property, engaging to become bound r ` Pity tendering in the sum expressed in the Par -4.--'4l7a'fPr the. due! performance of the Contract. Tenders to be made for the several Counties, and sepa -3 t 4.ll4T rickti and Station s , as s p ec ifi e d i n the Particulars ontreeis. ..'! LONDON, SATURDAY EVENING, MAY 16, 1829 No. 11,442. PRICE 7D. fordshire; Williams and Bethel], Lincoln's-Ina-Fields, London. John Baker, Hockwold, Norfolk, butcber, May 25, at at four, 26, at ten, and June 26, at four, at the Angel Inn, Norwich. Unthank, Foster, and Unthank, Norwich ; Lythgoe, Essex-street, Strand. John Coster, Gosport, Southampton, baker, May 29, June 2, and 26, at twelve, at the office of Messrs. Minchin, Gosport. Minchin, Gosport; Afinchin, Harpur-street, Bloomsbury. IMYIPE PARLIA MENT HOUSE OF LORDS.-(LAST NIGHT.) The..LoiD CHANaLLox entered the House a , Five minutes past Five o'clock. Seveial Bills were read a third time and passed. SALE OF GAME BILL. _ _ This week will be published, in post Bvo. price 7s. 6d. The Third Edition (with Additions) of James Wickenden Robinson and Henry Martinitohin son, Walbtook-buildings, London, May 22, attwelve, 29, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Commiegionera. Gale, Baginghall-street. John Bennett, Manchester, earthenware-dealer, May 28, 29, and June 26, at Wipe, at the York Hotel, Man chester. Hurd and Johnson, Temple, London; Wood, Manchester. tietii lo 4 wear etornotidi 1 ' 4 A: 111 )04a ibevou sia COUNTIES, &c. Gloucester Hants Isle of Mau Isle of Wight Kent ' Lancaster Middlesex Norfolk Northimberland ids of Guernsey, Jei Northampton Nottingham Pembroke Suffolk Somerset Surrey Su sex Warwick York and Alderney . CARPETS- C I . tivAltimousE, N o .,g, TOE OE CHEAPSIDE, NEAR ST. PAULS. CARTER and Co. respectfully invite the b eatassort e d public to inspect ene of th e l arges t, c h ea p es t, an d Stock of CARPETING in the Metropolis. BR USSELS, of s the most splendid new Patterns, and of 4theirs* rate rtianufacturert. Old patterns from as. 6d. r yard. Yard wide Kidderminster and Venetian, from • Per Yard. Stair Carpeting, Hearth Rugs, Druggets, and Floor Cloths in the greatest variety, at exceeding low prices. --- ,‘• TO 13E SOLD OR LET ON - T.RASEs 4lesen Miles from London only, and One Mile Westward A- of th e N orth Road, VREEROLD MANSION and Suitable Offitxm, Two Lode; fine grown Plantations, ex- Nlal walled forden, lawn g s, and small park of Thirty Acres , r , r :,,- I r eth fit for immediate occupation, calculated for a • -"Kloace of distinction , p ub lic seminary, or other larg e elt atlish rnent. ' or • miloticulars may be had and a plan seen (if by letter, V 441(1 ) of Mr. Richardson, surveyor, No. 7, Upper °rth-Place, Gray's Inn-road, London. 'nth Y Waspublishecl, in Bvo. 12s. with a Map, LIFE OF BELISARIUS By Lord MAHON. John Murray, Albemarle-street. Thja a Y Was published, price 2s. 6d. boards, or bound in roan 3s. 6d. f i 'C n TU RESQUE GUIDE to the RE ri„, "'ENT'S PARK : with accurate descriptions of 111 - _,'""tinl, the Diorama, and Zoological Gardens. N . ; v'ated with upwards of Thirty Engravings : corn- Ir111"' Wg a. Plan of th e P ar k ; Vi ews o f t h e T erraces, ZIPV• It c.; Exterior and Interior of the Colosseum ; "the Zool og i ca l Gardens, and Sketches of several The MIRROR of LITERATURE, Vol. I. to XII. 51, boards. London : Printed for John Limbird, 14.3, Strand. ,tl4 day vras published, in One Vol. post Bvo., price Bs. 6d. .pugrrlvE PIECES and REMINIS CENCES of LORD BYRON : A th _staining an entire New Edition of the HEBREW p~hwith the addition of several neve r b e f ore ; the whole illustrated with Critical, Historical, _'Moat, Political, and Theological Remarks, Notes, Interesting Conversations, and Observations, t il s ,l l.tb a t illustrious Poet : toge th er xvi(E. his Lord al _Autograph. Al so some Original Poetry, Letters, Recollections of Lady Caroline Lamb. ke or of By I. NATHAN, -. Essay on the History and Theory of Music, A'y*Ltondoik `lll lilted for k li c iiit c. aker, Tiedcher, and Co., ,Maria -lane. `l4 Saturdays. the 2d of May, was published by Mr. • COLETim, WEE KLY the FIRST NUMBER of a NEW THEPAPER, called . COURT JOURNAL. The leading g hat Peculiarihiect of this Paper will be to supply %, 0 1 , hnig been • felt as a desideratum in the . High er 4,. the British Metropolis. Its pages will furni s h R ecord anti Review of all matters and events, :odtical subjects alone excepted), which are calculated to Id e rest that elan of readers who come within what is c°lerstood by ,‘ The Court Circle." Such will be the 4 1' but 'by no means the sole object of the Court o i 4l . It will in fact embrace every feature which rably distinguishes the most approved Literary Jour of the d ay . Ole COURT JOURNAL is publish e d every S atur d ay i7ningt contai handomely printed on a q uarto sheet of sixteen s nsing forty-eiht a column s , price St], or Rped for circu g lation i n t h e Country free of postage Is. LOrders received by all Booksellers and Newsvenders, and the Clerks of the Roads. L%rornunications for the Editor may be addressed to the 11 7 of Mr. C o lb urn. Advertisements should be sent to Office, No. 19, Catberine-street, Strand. /W 4• FIVE POUNDS REWARD. EREAS, on Saturday, the 9th of May 1?p„, inst., a Gentleman, describing himself as Mr. tRICK ROBINSON, obtained a ot ti th . SE AND STANHOPE e Red L H ion Oß Livery Stables, Foot of the Surrey Side hib estminstee Bridge, which he hired for the Day, and g, tO return by Four o'clock the same Afternoon, that not • • . sw ee been heard of. a Light Chesnut 'Jorge, is 15 Hands and an Inch ag Le ed ; with a large Substanc e Over th e F et l oc k s o f , F!; one of the Hind . Legs White up t o the To an d the other with a White Heel ; as lost Ittlieroni the Off-sid e o f t h e M out h ;i s of h ood Sha p e and a littl e affected in the Wind. gp ~Vi ,ftr oess is Brass mounted, with a Stag's Head on jke nk ta e ri rk t. . v B l . - .ope is Brown, with whole round-panel Body, L'ight Ora', Linir; • Mail Axletrees, with Brass fe Ott a nd the Dation . Iron, Lining; a Brass Bead over the tor. 4 REWARD OF.FIVE POUNDS 11 o 4 tio;; . offered to any Person who will give such Infor- L t lti k , t t : °lay lead to the Recovery of the said Horse and ~IC ' : 1 4 ? he paid, on recovery, b y applying at the rvery Stables, as above. 04At The Gentleman is a Young Man, about 25 Years k' Pive Feet Seven Inches High, with pale, long o,"; itlger-coloured Hair, and a few Pock-marks on t l ie was dresse d in a Dark Blue Cut-off Coat, h rah Tr and Military Boots, and had Yellow 1 1 "t° ° s on h• • th 1g h i x 1829. tklllLiot S a . S AND LIVER COMPLAINTS. . Di, 41 , 11 d and effectual remedy for all those 1.4. -ortiers which : • • i ph . 414 tii. or ginate in a morbid . action of the Iplota*, T. oary Organs, namely, Indigestion, Loss of ti i ' ead_ ac h e Heartburn, Flatulencies, Spasms, 'lsllllLal'u.Affection's of the Liver, &c. &c. DIXON'S 1i, 44 9 oh 8 PILLS (which do not contain mercury 'T tthe ) k raliN_ Ivive met with more general approval than " i t'lli.i h'.le(licioe whatsoever. They unite every recom 't r ; t).- 411iiiil operation with successful effect ; and re 4, it' restraint or continement whatever during their ‘ l4,l 4 4tnat‘sryie.al. climates, where the consequeuce_s . of .nre fY k re ai". Vttiated bile are so prexalent and alArmi g, NI, „ ' Invaluable and efficien: protection. They! are o.exer"uliarly. calculated to correct disorders arising tili r e "" of th e t." , to restore the tone • f the stomach, t b l 'e bo-e:lte loo lt a f r in 'e plaint s occasioned by irregularity 'Nlil i n '._'' L ' t i l kr, 6 r z.ex, itiVs. 9d., 4s. 6d., and 225., by Messrs. . tlYille.:ir4llBt,, Cheapside, corner St. Paul's, London , 'g a p • eet, Dui4i n ; B; .‘il Prince's-street, Edinburgh ; kk 14-..tinoipal Alediekts, P.senders. 1 "• tt. tliikeo i 4. 2 ...- - sxievi. heretofore sold are discontinued, s e e"Autsolelyd in their place, by which a con laYinz will arna' to the consumer. - - "MONTGOMERY'S UNIVERSAL PRAYER ; DEATH; A VISION of HEAVEN; and a VISION of HELL." Also, uniformly printed with the above, price 7s. 6d. The Eighth Edition of MONTGOMERY'S " OMNI PRESENCE of the DEITY." Dedicated, by permis sion, to his Grace the Archbishop of Canterbury. Printed for S. Maunder, 10, Newgate-street. This day was published, in One Vol. Svo. price 15s. in Cloth, MISCELLANIES, in Two Parts, PROSE and VERSE., By WM. MAVOR, LLD. Printed fur Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green. Of whom may be hid, by the same Author, The ENGLISH SPELLING BOOK, Is. 6.1. bd. SELECTION of CLASSICAL ENGLISH POETRY, ss. 6d. bd. The BRITISH NEPOS, ss. bd. ELEMENTS of NATURAL HISTORY, '7s. 6d. bd. ABRIDGEMENT of PLUTARCH, ss. 6d. bd. UNIVERSAL SHORT-VIAND, 6s. bds. DR. PARIS'S •PHARMACOLOGIA. 2 vols. Bvo. New Edition, was this day published, price 30s. Dv HA RMACOLOGIA ; comprehending the Art of Prescribing upon Fixed and Scientific Principles ; together with the History of Medicinal Sub- stances. By J. A. PARIS, M.D. F.R.S., In 2 vols. Svo. Seventh Edition. This Edition contains the Medicinal Dynameter, or Re volving Seale, by which the absolute and relative strength of any quantity of a medicinal compound, as well as its several equivalents, may be immediately found by bringing the substance in question to the figure representing its dose; also, the Analysis of upwards of 180 Quack or Patent Aledicines. Printed for• Thomas and George Underwood, Fleet- street. Also, by the same Author, A TREATISE on DIET. Fourth E.lition, Sao., price 10s. 6d. FROM THE GAZETTE OF LAST NIGHT. Whitehall, May 14, 1829. The King has been pleased to present the Reverend Ro derick Reid to the church at Hillin in Waternish, in the parish of Kilinuir, in the presbytery of Sky and shire of Inverness. The King has also been pleased to present the Reverend Alexander Ross to the church at Ul!spool, in the parish of Loch Broom, in the presbytery of Locharron and labile of Ross. Commissions signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Somerset. Thomas George Fitzgerald, Esq. to be Deputy Lieu tenant. Dated April 10, 1829. Thomas George Warrington Carew, Esq. to be ditto. April 12. Edward Ayshford Sandford, Esq. to be ditto. April 16. Commissions signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Flint. Charles Blayney Trevor Roper, Esq. to be Deputy Lieutenant. Jan. 20. _ Edward Pemberton, Evq. to he ditto. Feb. 9. Commission in the Royal South Lincoln Militia, signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Lincoln. Levett Landeu Boscawen Ibbetson, Esq. to be Captain. May 9. DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY, Richard Holmes Taylor and Henry Walker, New-eourt, Tlfrogmorton -street, wine-merchants. BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. John Baines Bond, Windmill-street, Haymarket, ♦io tualler, from May 19 to 29, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. BANKRUPTS. Henry Tulloh, Gloucester-place, HGxton, merchant, to surrender May 19, 29, and June 26, at two, at the Court of Commissioners. Burt and Drummond, Car marthen-street, Bedford-square. John Goodhand Parkes, York, wine- merchant, May 22, 25, at eleven, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Com missioners. Leigh, George-street, Mansion-house. Fredet ick Wyatt, Marlow, coach-proprietor, May 22, at ten, 29, at twelve, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Goodman, Tokenhouse-yard, London ; Ashley, Watford. Dennis Batt, Hazel-Down Farm, Penton-Mewsey, Hants, corn-dealer, May 22, 23, and June 26, at eleven, at the Lamb Inn, Abingdon, Berks. Ford, Great Queen street, Lincoln's-inn-fields ; Frankum, Abingdon, Berks. James Garner, Woolston-Mill, Warwickshire, miller, May 25, 26, and June 26, at eleven, at the George Inn, Hi n ckley, Leicestershire. Jarvis and Power, Hinckley ; Jones and Horton, Holborn -court, Gray's Inn. William Janson, Stockport, cotton-spinner, June 1,5, and 26, at two, at the Star Inn, Manchester. Makinson and Sanders, Middle Temple; Makinson, Manchester. Mathew Brumfield, Croydon, coal-merchant, May 22, 29, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Hyde, Ely-place, Holborn. Samuel John King, S tratford-upon-Avon, upholsterer, May 22, at twelve, June 9, at ten, and 26, at one, at the Court of Commissioners. Smith, Chancery-lane. Andrew Cosner, Bridge-road, Lambeth, carpenter, May 26, at nine, 29, at ten, and June 26, at nine, at tl:e Court of Commissioners. Alexander, Clement's-inn. Richard Hawkins Ottway, New Sarum, Wilts, coach maker, June 5, at six, 6, and 26, at eleven, at the Spread Eagle Inn, New Sarum. Dew, Salisbury ; Hicks and Braikenridge, Bartlett's-buildings, Holborn. Nathaniel French, jun., Oxford -street, draper, May 19, at eleven, 29, at twelve, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Brittan, Basinghall-street. Thomas Hollingsworth, Goswell-street, butcher, May 19, at twelve, 26, and June 26, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Hindmarsh and Son, Crescent, Jewin street, Cripplegate. William Blatherwick, 13ceston, Nottinghamshire, lace manufacturer, May 25, 26, and June 26, at eleven, at the Flying Horse Inn, Nottingham. Wadsworth, Nottingham ; Capes, Raymond-buildings, Gray's-Inn, London. Thomas Atkerton, Manchester, innkeeper, May 29, 30, and June 26, at nine, at the York Hotel, Manchest r. Chew, Manchester ; Adlington, Gregory, and Faulkner, Bedford-row, London. John Benson and John William Wesley, William.. street, Bridewell-precinct, coal-merchants, May 19, June 2, and 26, at two, at the Court of Commisiioners. Maddox and Sidney, Austin-friars. William Williams, Lombard-street, merchant, May 22, at eleven, 26, and June 26, at ten, at the Court of Com missioners. Nicholson, Dowgate-hill. Robert Levens, Drury-lane, coach-master, May 22, at twelve, 29, and June 26, at eleven, at the Court of Com missioners. Bruce and Sons, Surrey-street, Strand. Richard Winnall, St. John, BLAwardine, Worcester shire, miller, May 28, 29, and June 26, at eleven, at the Hop Pole Inn, Worcestrr. Cardale, Buxton, and Newton, Gray's-Inn, London; Parker and Smith, Wor cester, William Best, Wolverhampton, factor, May 28, at six, 29, and June 26, at ten, at the Whiston Cross Inn, Salop. Tizard awl Blower, Lincoln's-inn-fields, London; Holy sake and Robinson, Wolverhampton. Joseph Phillips, Bristol, builder, June 3,4, and 26, at twelve, at the Commercial-room s , Bristol. King and Whittaker, Gray's Inn-square ; Cary and Cross, 13ristol. Lewis Lewis, Cwmsychan, near Pontypool, Monmouth - shire, grocer, June 3, 4, and 26, at one, at the Commer cial-rooms, Bristol. Bigg, Southampton -buildings, Chan cery-lane, London; Bigg, Bristol. Thomas Walter, sen., Wilstone, Hertfordshire, baker, May 22, 29, at twelve, and June 26, at eleven, at the Court of Commi*sioners. Williams, Berkhamstead, Hert- DIVIDHNDS. James Woodford, Melcombe Regis, Dorsetshire, iron_ monger, June 4, at eleven, at the Antelope Inn, Dorchester. John Cooper, Nottingham, lace-manufacturer, June 9, at ten, at the Lion Hotel, Nottingham. James Thomas Barham, Bread-street, Cheapsi4e, lace dealer, May 26, at tea, at the Court o f Commissioners. Henry - Foulds, Queen -street, Southwark, carpenter, June 2, at eleven, at the Court of Commissioners. Edward Pletts, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, ship-broker, June 5, at ten, at the Turf Hotel, Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Peter Geronimo, Bristol, looking-glass-manufacturer, June 5, at eleven, at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham. Thomatl3arnett, Kendal, Westmoreltad, June 15, at eleven, at the Whitehall-buildings, Kendal. John and Robert Christie, and John Stewart, Mark lane, June 12, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. William Matthews, Crooked-lane, tin-merchant, May 26, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. Charles Howard, Shacklewell, victualler, June 5, at twelve, at the Court of Commissioners. Thomas Wyatt, St. Paul's Church-yard, warehouseman, June 5, at ten, at the Court of Commissioners. A ugustin Clarkson, Arbor-terrace, Comniercial -road, ship-owner, June 5, at one, at the Court of Commissioners. William Field, Nutkin's-corner, Bermondsey, plumber, June 5, at ten, at the Court of Commissioner,. Edward Jones, Reading, canvas-manufacturer, June 2, at one, at the Court of Comtnissioner% Thomas Johnson, Cheapside, warehouseman, June 5, at tvn, at the Court of Commissioners. Edward 'William Garbett, Hercules Hall, Lambeth zinc -manufacturer, May 26, at ten, at the Court of Corn. missioners. CERTIFICATES-JUNE 5. Williatia Payton Suinmerfield and William Lloyd Sum , merfield, Liverpool, met chants. Thomas Friday, Boughton, Kent, grocer. Morris Jones, Brenmawr, Brecon, ironmonger. Duncan Erhard Lewis, Bath, surgeon. Thotnas Tonikinson, Leek, Stafford, tanner. James Clark, Kensington-Gravel-pits, victualler. Thomas Nelson Hirst and John Wood, Huddersfield ; merchants. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. Elizabeth Pummery and Richard Pitcher, Chester-street, Kennington-lane, Surrey, stone-masons. Catharine Jones and Mary Ann Jones, Hereford, dress makers. James Holding and James Morris, Swan-mead, Ber• mondsey, carriers. C. Woodward, Henry Bedford, and J. Blizard, Stanley, dealers. Joseph Ashton and William Nicholson, Whitby, York shire. confectioners. William Plackwood, jun., Thomas Dimmock, and James Keeling, dealers. John Cathie and James Carlile, Leeds, Yorkshire, snuff manufamrers. Humphrey Chamberlain, Henry Chamberlain, Walter Chamberlain, and John Lilly, porcelain-manufacturers. Joseph Middleton and Samuel Middleton, Hyde, Che shire, ironmongers. Gray,.William Gray, and Robert Brown, Bromp ton-park, Kensington-road, nurserymen. George Worrall and Henry Gold, Bristol, bankers. Avery Fletcher and John Fletcher, Stockport, brush manufacturers. - Lucy Shapton and Sarah Shapton, Bridport, Dorset_ shire, haberdashers. Robert Millington, William Milnes Millington, and Samuel Youle Bailey, Manchester, dealers. Paul Catterall, Thomas Ainsworth, and William Eccles, Over Darwen, Lancashire, cotton-manufacturers. Mr. JAMES BLAZE, landl or d o f th e Turk's Head, in Harley-street, was yesterday fined 5/. at the Mary-la-bonne-office, for allowing the game of " bumble puppy," to be played in his house. FRANKFORT, MAY 3.—The fair has been very favourable, especially to the sellers of English manufac tures and French calicoes, but the demand fur British manufactures in particular so far exceeded all the new consignments, that many wholesale dealers have been able to dispose of stocks which they have long had on hand, at very good prices, and those who have had several descrip tions of goods, for io.tance waistcoat-pieces, conveyed by the post, have been amply indemnified by the advance in price for the additional expence of conveyance. Among the English manufactures, the woollen cloths in particular deserve notice. There is at present a great rivalry be tween them and the Flemish manufactures of the same de- scription. Even good judges of these articles find it diffi cult to decide which of the two, paying regard to the prices, deserves the preference, as the English manufactures in this point of view are of very unequal quality. Yesterday an inquest was held at the King's Bench prison, on the body of Mr. JOHN PYTCHES, ag e d 55, a prisoner, who was formerly M. P. for Sudbury. The deceased entered the prison on the Ist May, 1813, and had generally enjoyed a good state of health till within the last six weeks, when he was attacked with a violent inter.. nal complaint, which caused his death. The Jury re turned a verdict of—Died by the visitation of Gon. The deceased's election expencee, and various law-suits in which he was concerned, were stated to have been the cause of his insolvency. He has left a widow and two children. A question of considerable importance came before the Insolvent Debtors' Court yesterday. The ques tion was, whether an annuity bequeathed to an insolvent would pass to the creditors, although the testator had di rected that it should not be subject to any bankruptcy or insolvency. RICHARD BEST, Esq. in 1826, became in solvent, and shortly afterwards took the benefit of the Act —his debts then amounted to 14,000/. In 1828, he hid bequeathed to him a legacy of 4,000/., and an annuity of 4001. a year; to his wif e 1001. year , an d to their on 100/. The testator, however, had directed, in his will that the legacy of 4,0001., and the annuity of 400/. should not be subject to any bankruptcy or insolvency, but should be appropriate' to the support of the insolvent and his fauily. On the death of the testator taking place, the assignees applied to the Lord Chancellor to appropriate the legacity and annuity to the payment of the insolvent's debts, and his Lordship then referred the matter to the Commis sioners of the Insolvent Court. The matter was argued by Mr. Koff and Mr. CHANDLER, of the Chancery Bar; and Mr. HEATH and Mr. COOK argued the question with great ability. The Court said, that as the case was one of a most important nature, they should postpone judgment for a week. On Tuesday an occurrence took place in the family of a tradesman at Deptford, arising out of a fit of jealousy, which bad nearly terminated in the destruction of two persons at least. The tradesman' s wife being ill, the wife of a mechanic was engaged to assist hi m i n t h e s h op. One day after dinner the tradesman having got a little ine briated, put his arms round the neck Of the mechanic's wife, and a prating servant girl immediately conveyed the intelligence to her mistress. The mechanic's wife was instantly ordered out of the house ; and on returning to her husband, she informed him of what bad taken place, and be immediately flew into a violent passion, and used epithets of great harshness towards her. The poor woman, driven to a state of distraction, owing. to the unjust suspi cions against her, withdrew to another room, and swal lowed a quantity of oxalic acid. She then informed her husband what she had done, and he became quite frantic, and seizing a sword which he kept in his room, vowed vengeance on the head of the tradesman. He then pro cetded to the tradesman's house ; but not meeting with him, smashed a great number of the windows. He was then taken into custody ; and on Thursday was taken be fore the Magistrates at Deptford, and having paid the ex pences of the glass he had broken, he was discharged. On-the motion of the Marquis of SALISBURY, the committal of this Bill was postponed till Friday next. • The Duke of NORFOLK presented a peti tion from the land-owners of a Hundred in the county of Sussex, complaining of the law price of wool, the cause of which had been assigned by many to its deterioration, which the petitioners denied. He (the Noble Duke) con curred most cordially with the petitioners, and in that concurrence he was strengthened by the ob servations he had made on his own flock. When the motion with respect to the wool trade came be fore their Lordships, he should take the liberty of making a few observations. The Duke of RICHMOND also presented seve ral petitions to the same effect from Hundreds in the calmly of Sussex. He had a small property in France, and had also a small flock there, and he ac tnally got more for his wool th e r e ;ban in this country. — Vae Noble Duke likewise gave notice that he shiitild move some resolutions with respect to the subject on Tuesday week, for which day he requested their Lordships to be summoned. Those Resolutions were so moderate, that he (the Noble Duke) apprehended no opposition could be made to them. If, however, there was, he should certainly take the opinion of the House upon them. SILK TRADE. The Duke of RICHMOND presented a petition from the Silk Manufacturers of London and its vi cinity, complaining of the Bill that had been read a second time before their Lordships, and stating that, if it was suffered to pass into a law, it would be their utter ruin. It was most respectfully signed, and certainly deserved the serious consideration of their Lordships. MESSAGE FROM THE COMMONS. Sir Alexander Grant, Sir NVm. Rowley, Mr. Davenport, Mr. Egerton, Mr. George Phillips, and Mr. Green, brought up the Navy Treasury Bill, together with several Private Bills. Mr. Johnson brought up the 17th Report of the Commissioners of Accounts in Ireland from the Chief Secretary. Mr. O'Neill brought up an account of Tolls and Rates from the Commissioners of the Royal Canal, Ireland. Mr. Pearsall, from the Coal Market, presented returns of the selling price of coal from 1807 to the present time. Lord DELAWARR presented 'a petition from the county of Sussex, agai nst the importation of Foreign Wool. MILLERS AND MEALMENS' PETITION. The Earl of MALMESBURY presented a peti tion from the general body of millers and meal men, praying their Lordships to take into considera tion the state of their trade. They asserted that the importation of foreign flour had been carried on to that very great extent that their mills had become - a burden to them instead of a source of profit, and that in consequence of the export of machinery of late years to the continent, they had no hope of being able to compete with the foreign producer in the market. They stated that the raw produce should be alone allowed to be imported, and lb= the restriction would equally serve the trade and the consumers, the public; for they added, that in these large importations of foreign flour we lose the offal, which might be employed in feeding pigs and poultry, and devoted even to purposes, if he might use the expression, of a nobler nature. He (the Earl of Malmesbitry) would not go the length with the petitioners of placing a prohibition upon the importation of an article of the first necessity, but he thought their petition well worthy of their Lordships' attention. Lord KING presented a petition from the Sur rey Anti-Slavery Society, praying the House not to emancipate their dark-coloured fellow-subjects.— The Noble Lord also presented several petitions against the Corn Laws, from the neighbourhood of Gloucestershire, stating the distress under which they laboured, and praying for relief. Lord FARNHAM begged to call the attention of the House to a subject of vast importance to Ire land. The Grand Jury laws were extremely oppressive and inequitably distributed. An ord. dance survey of the counties of Ireland wat now in progress, and as far as this survey had gone, the Noble Lord believed it had been found to be extremely accurately performed. He understood that as soon as the survey was made, the valuation was to be applied by the Lord Lieutenant in the place of the taxation that had been so much complained of, and he wished the Noble Duke at the bead of the Government to say in what state this subject now s:ood and was to be regarded. The Duke of WELLINGTON was glad to have the testimony of the Noble Lord who had just spoken, as to the accuracy with which the work of survey had been performed by the Ordnance Officers. It was a work of greater magnitude, and required more time to accom plish, than was at first anticipated. Ile was not aware that any one county had yet been completely surveyed. A Bill %vas in progress in the other House for settling the boundaries, and as soon as that passed no time would be lost in render ing every facility to forward the object in view. The House then adjourned. HOUSE OF COADIONS.-(LAST NIGHT.) The House was opened this day soon after Three o'clock, shortly afterwards there was a very full attendance of Members. The Gallery was much crowded, arid all the passages leading to the House were thronged with persons, anxious to obtain a view of Mr. O'Connell. The SPEAKER took the Chair at five minutes to Four o'clock, at which time the House presented a most animated appearance, being crowded with Members. Mr. Peel entered the House at Four o'clock. Prayers having been read, The SPEAKER, requested, if any Hon. Member was in attendance who had not taken his seat, that he would come to the table and be sworn. At this moment all the Members rose, and the anxiety and curiosity manifested, exceeded every t hing we ever before witnessed. In a few minutes afterwards, Mr. O'Connell was introduced by Lords Ebring ton and Duncannon, and immediately came forward. Mr. O'Connell then had a short conversation in an under tone, with t h e pr i nc i pal clerk o f t h e H ouse, The SPEAKER t h en said—lt i s my w hich the latter communicated to the Speaker. duty to s t a te to the H ouse that the course the Hon. Mem b er at the table intends to pursue cannot he complied with, and I must consider I am right, un!ess cor rected by the authority of the House. The Hon. "Gentleman claim s to be admitted to take his seat under the authority of a recent Act of Parliament. If I properly understand that Act it contains two points. The first is repealing the oaths of Transubstantiation, and the second appointing an oath to be taken by all Homan Catholics, in lieu of the this condition tha t t h e Hon. Member thus app l y i ng Abjuratio n an d S uprema cy, but with returned af ter t h e pass i ng o f t h at Act.-- (miules o ta a rb, t e ha of hear.)--Now —Now the Honourable Gentleman at the table was returned long before the pass ing of that Act, and therefore it cannot apply to any person thus circumstanced. I think I have put the proper construction upon that Act. It is, therefore, necessary for the Hon. Gentleman to take the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy before the Lords of the Privy Council, and those, in conjunction with the Oath of Abjuration, here, the same as all other Members, before he can take his seat. t feel it my duty to state, that the Honourable Gentleman must now wit hdra w.—( Hear, hear, hear.)—lf I am wrong in my judgment, there is an appeal open by petition, or any Honourable Gentleman may he entrusted with the case, when, if I am wrong in my opinion, it may be corrected, but at present I feel it my duty to request the Hon. Gentleman to withdraw.—( Hear, hear.) Mr. BROUGHAM then rose, and was about to address the House, when he tvas called to order by the Speaker. Mr. O'Connell then withdrew from the table. Mr. BROUGHAM said he was sure that no person could bow with greater deference to the Chair than he did, but with great submission, he thought, he (the Speaker) was in error when he came to the conclusion that the Hon. Member for Clare, according to the usage of Parliament, had not a right to be heard. The first difficulty in the case did not present itself until the Hon. Member for Clare was ordered to withdraw, and then he (Mr. Brougham) endeavoured to obtain a hearing, but was called to order by the Chair, until the Hon. Member had withdrawn. If it was doubtful whether he could be heard on the floor of the House, he thought he might have been at liberty to raise the question then; but as he had now withdrawn, he should state his view of the question as it stook]. According to all precedent and principle, and accord ing to the construction of the law upon the subject, he thought that the matter ought to be so far sub ject to discussion, as to allow the House to satisfy itself that the course pursued was the correct one, and also to allow the Honourable Member to be heard as to his objections to take those oaths. It was a question of great importance, and the opi nion of no single Member ought to be taken as con clusive, but the opinion of the whole House ought to he taken on a question of such moment. What he wished now to contend for was the right of the Hon. Member for Clare to be heard in his place, or, as he had, perhaps, no place, at the table of the House, without taking the oaths, in order to state his objection to taking them. There were two or three precedents directly in point, and he there fore thought that this preliminary point should be decided before the principal question was entered upon. The first precedent he should quote was the case of Sir H. Monson, who was re turned in 1689. He was called to the table, and asked as to his objections to the oaths, and he stated that his objections were of a personal nature. It appeared by the Parliament history that he had spoken a few sentences by way of explanation at the table of the House. The House was not satisfied with the reasons he assigned, and he was reeted to withdraw, and a new writ was issued thereupon. What, however, he wished to Ball the attention of the House to, was the fact, that before the new writ was issued, he was heard at the table of the House.—(Hear, hear.) — In the case of Mr. Archdale also, the same course was pursued, and he was heard previous to being ordered to withdraw. The Speaker had prevented (Mr. O'Connell) from being heard before he with drew, and his object now was, that the Hon. Mem ber should be re-called, and then let the House deal with the question in its ulterior proceedings as it might think proper. lie admitted the great import ance of the question, and thought each step that was taken should be taken with the fullest deliberation. (Hear, hear.)—The lion. and Learned Gentleman then moved that the Member for Clare be recalled, and heard at the baT of the House.--(Hear, hear.) Mr. Secretary PEEL said that he need scarcely. remind the House that the question before then► was strictly of a judicial nature, and they must therefore uct according to precedent in such cases. He could not himself entertain a doubt but that the Hon. and Learned Gentleman was not entitled to be heard on the question ; because, in that case, every man who was returned to that House, had an equal right to state his objections to taking the oaths. By law a Member was bound to take the oaths before he took his seat; and before taking the oath, he could not exercise his functions as a Member. With respect to the precedents quoted, there had been no time to examine them, and if there were any doubts on the subject he trusted that the House would not upon that occasion come to a decision. Until this point was disposed of, the dis cussion of the other would be premature, and lie would not therefore pronounce an opinion on it on that occasion. As the point at issue was of import ance, he thought they had better postpone it until Monday, or some other day. Mr. C. WYNN said that he thought the precedents of the House v ere in favour of the Ho nourable Member's being heard. He agreed that the Hon. Member ought not to be heard as a Mem- ber, but upon his light to be admitted as such, which was a sufficient line of distinction. As precedents had been spoken of, he begged leave to refer to a third case which had been decided : he alluded to the case of Mr. Wilkes. That gentleman having been returned as a member of Parliament by a large majority, the House would not receive him, and declared that he was incapable of sitting in Par- liament. He presented a petition to the House, complaining of a breach of privilege as a member of Parliament, and the House decided to hear the petitioner make his defence. He asked the House, " whether situated as be was, he would not incur the penalties prescribed •by different acts of Parlia ment if be came to the House for tha k furpos ?" and the Speaker said, " It has been customary for a petitioner to state the allegation of his petition without taking the oaths, and, in so doing, he is not guilty of any offence within the intent and meaning of the acts."—(Hear, hear4--Now it was the same thing here, and he maintained that every individual having a wrong to be redressed, should be heard either at the bar or at the table. In his opinion, however, it would be much better to ad here to the former course. It would be better to allow the Hon. Member, on his application, to state at the bar his reason for believing that he was en titled to take the new oaths and to reject the old. It would be proper to hear him at the bar on that point like any other petitioner, or like any other person claiming any right of that House. He thought that there was no question as to which way this should be done. If a petition or application were made, setting forth that the Hon. Member wished to state to the House the grounds on which he con ceived that he ought to be admitted to sit in Parlia ment on taking the new oaths, (supposing the House not to know any thing whatever of the printed document which had been put into, he hands of Hon. Member.), he was of opinion. that the House should hear the iippiicant in some shape or other:—(Hear,).—,H e did not care whether the Hon. Member was heard standing at the table or staoding at the bar, but it was a principle, founded on all reason and on all precedent, that when an in dividual asked fur this right, he should be allowed to state the grounds on which he claimed it. Mr.SUGMN considered that before the Hon.- Member could be heard in that House it would be necessary to repeal the sth of El4aheth, as that Act Appl;ed to all Members. before tbey entereil t i" fr. It stated that if any Member should Nr sz.vere to address that House before havii:g take,i ihe oaths, he should by such an act cea s e to be Member. If that Act were to be en"oreed; !louse was bound to enforce it, he did not ,Ce It were possible to allow the Hon. Member to a,!- dress that House. Mr.BROUGHAM said,that at present the How:0 knew nothing that the Hon. Member had to ad duce. Here was a Member presenting a certificate from the officer of the Lord High Steward, auti;o rised by him to take the oaths, and signed by the two commissioners, but the House knew nothing of his reasons till they heard him. What ever his Honourable and Learned Friend might he disposed to say on the subject, he. considered that. the House could know nothing of his objections till they heard them. He did not know Ivhether his Hon. and Learned Friend might be allowed to ' put questions to him on the floor of the House on the point of the certificate. That was quite another thing, all the House then knew was, that the Hon. Member had refused to take certain oat hs, and agreed to take other oaths, and he would not say whether they were not bound to allow him to take those other oaths to which he did not object —(Hear.)—if they were not bound to hear him upon those which he did object to take. Mr. PEEL did not think there was any material difference whether the Hon. Member was allowed to address the House .at the bar or at the tahle. The whole subject was of such importance, that it was useless coming to any decision upon any part of it with precipitation. The Hon. and Learned Member having made a motion, however, it was tic .• eessary to have it discussed, but he hoped he would see the propriety of postponing the motion till Mon day next, to allow every Metnbcr to come to the discussion after a deliberate consideration of the question. Mr. SUGDEN observed, that the Honourable Member could not have taken-the proper oaths before the - Lord High Steward, because he had stared himself prepared to object to them. The Hon. awl Learned Member therefore might have spared him self his observations. Mr. BROUGHAM But I had better not have spared myself the observations.—(A laugh.)-- The Hon. and Learned Member seems to think that because the Hon. Gentleman in question has pub fished a pamphlet out of doors, declaring that lie had objections to the oaths that it was impossible for him to have afterwards gone to the Steward's Office and prepared himself for taking them. It is clear, however, by the certificates which he produces, that he has been there and has taken some oaths. It is admitted on both sides of the House that this is a is a im nd pco c r o ta n l sT( e ie ' ra l t i e nd al atten tion. table or the b ar , how etictiavosenrere; o qu f ii rtEe t si h ti e hst eh re m c ae o mrt s to t asittn s h e e r grave t o hat we must hear the Honourable Member for Clare. Suppose he was a petitioner, we have a right to hear him, and in such a situation any man may be heard here. Why not hear him now, if he is to be heard at all ? I certainly consider that the de sire of the House ought to be to hear - trim. The only question will be, whether he is to be heard at the bar or the table, and I have no objection in com pliance with the wishes of the House to postpone the discussion till Monday next. After a few words from Sir F. riceomr, who was inaudible in the gallery, The SPEAKER stated that before he put the thoughtqtlstn to the House, he trusted botlld it put themwould niont fullb be unreasonabletha that he s possession of the considerations which h a d deter mined him to take the course which h e h a d, an d question which he had before intended to take. The House on all sides admitted that it was a subject of great importance, both as to the consideration of the law, and its application to the person. All I have to state to the House, continued the Right lion. Gen tleman is, that though it is impossible for me to differ from them on the great importance of the question, and on the consequent necessity for delibe ration, it was for them to appoint the time for deli beration; and not for the Chair. The course which I pursued, under the circumstances of the case, was to take that line which the law of the country pointed out to me: knowing, that if I were in error, the House would set me right without prejudice to this gentleman.—(Hear, hear.)—With respect to not hearing the individual at the table, I found my self on this,—that I know of no instance where any person has been heard, without a decision of the House that he should be heard, short of being a member of the House—(hear, hear,)—and it was obvious if a debate were going on, with a person thus situated standing on the floor of the House, that he might subject himself, not to the provisions of the statute of Elizabeth, but to those of the sta tute of Charles ll.—(Hear, hear.)--This is the ground on which I stand.—(Hear, hear.)-1 do not advance any thing to prejudice the case itself, but merely state the ground on which I proceeded. There is one other subject on which I will make a single observation—that is, as to the oaths taken before the Lord Steward or his Commissioners. The House are well aware that the Lord Steward and his Commissioners are not the officers of this House. The certificate received from them, that the person has taken the oaths, is put in by the pre.- son receiving it; therefore, it is impossible for the ' House to know, in its aggregate capacity, what oaths were taken ; and when no evidence is give-, that improper oaths were taken, the preettmlltion is that the oaths taken were proper.—(lier.r.) Mr. TIERNEY said, the question simply was, whether the Hon. Member for Clare should be heard at the table or at the liar,—a question which he thought ought to be settled at once. Because, in point of fact, if it were not decided to-day, another day would be lost, which he considered to be a very great hardship to the Hon. Member for Clare, who would not be able during that time to know how he ought to proceed. Now if the motion of his Hon. and Learned Friend were adopted, the lion. Member for Clare might have been 'allowed this evening to state at the table the grounds on which he hesitated to take the oath proffered by the clerk. It would not be necessary for them to de cide hastily on the argument which he might adduce, —nothing would, indeed, be more proper than an adjournment of the discussion, after the lion. Meot ber for Clare had been heard. (Hear.) But to adjourn, without knowing what the Hon. Member for Clare's argument was, appeared to him to be perfectly absurd. The lion, Member for Clore could not be heard at the-bar, or at the table, with out an application, The motion before the House was a preliminary step, and the sooner it was de bmCeil g a b r h eetad wasstill a tb h te e h a t : i d mil o r r e;n n o o at t : igd a fi t ttb t o h e e ma t ae a xk b et l table. If p i a f p n p de cided the better. He confessed that he saw no n difficulty in the case, whether the Hon. Member for wouldGlieaatilibooe;r: allowed o d to be heard at the table by a decision this evening, he fix the day when he should be so heard. Hear.) This was the most direct and consistent mode of proceed ing. It was, he contended, a question on which they ought to be prepared to come to an immediate decie sion, (Hear.) And if, as the Speaker had said, n o precedent could be found,—though he understood from his Hon. and Learned Friend that there were some,—that circumstance must render delay still less nece,sary, But whether the precedents were more or less, or none at all, some opportunity ought to be given fee explanation to the person refusine to take the oaths, He believed in three cases which bad been quoted; the reasons given by the pn - ties were very short,—and for any thing that he knew the reasons of the Hon. Member for Clare might be equally 50,.. (Hear, hear.)--But after a Member had been reported, as regularly elected,—after he had taken the oaths up stairs, the House, in its wisdom, said—" We know not what to say or do." --(A laugh,)-..'They ought, instead of putting off the discussion, to decide at once to hear the Hon. Member for Clare at the table; and if they decided differently,. why then Ire might make his application to be heard at the bar. If they proceeded differently the Hon, Member for Clare, wliQ bad come end Just published, the Third Edition, in crown, Bvo. price is. 6d. of MRS. G. G. RICHARDSON'S POEMS. " Mrs. Richardson adds another to the female authors of the day—to an aggregate of talent among the fair sex, which has never been befora witnessed in this Country."— New Monthly Magazine, Oct. 1523. London; William Crofts, 19, Chancery-lane; and Co., Edinburgh; and Sincla:r, Dumfries.