The Sun. — London, England, 1805-04-30 00:00:00

atTe/sary. Rig Hon. Viand had' nut stated that coy nt , rsfin wAs ihqiiry, as indeed inilivi:. wss, or ought to oe above inquiry in this Cmrory, but ::.oat. the Whie Litd will beyond the te4elt .f by any inquiry. the letter of the fi n. Baronet Coils , riot kvotiii notice till the other documents should :be had. In moving for .Papers, the lion. Boronet ought oat least to have given a At....' , lptiort ref the documents he called for. The Rom, he thought. had .gat by the omission into a difficult state 4:41 . proceeding. VICKii.VS2N stated, in a few words, that the "Motion which had, been made, (by Mr: Klnnsitri) fur the ,produlion of the• letter of Mc. Tucker to . the Mmiralty was precisely the same - as that then nutlet by the Hon. Baronet. Mr. G. PPNSONOY shpuld.not vote. for re ad ing the Papers. It was not lair to the,Noble Lord. rite Papers: were inten4eil not only as a justification of the lion.. Baronet, but a new, frerdt, distind, mat. to of crimination against the Noble... Lord, and„ , in candour he was entitled to on c !x l iitv,,iol,.ol Th e °hied, and of the documents. This he was entitled to claim frnas the justice of Parliament, leaving its generosity out :.f the. question, or without resting on his ,ch.rader end service , , or on chile feelings towards him which pervaded every part of the coin. munity. ArTORIVEY.GENER AL. •obsetvctl, 'that if any other person but Lord St. Vincent were the ohjett of the Motion, nu ohjetlion.would be made to laying the Documenteon the Table. But Wei there o pt a Report on the Table charging the Hon. Barr. with haying. omitted to have iitifornied the First Lord ,of she Admiralty of certain important tranitatitorts He had looked into the intr6dudory Weer-linos the comencement of the discussion, by which it aptecared that the Hon. Bulnet; when he Inond that hie conduct had been reflected on by the SII4O Report, had tendered to, be re.examined ; which the Commissionete had, no doubt, on sufficient grounds, refused. The Hone Batt, had then addressed himself to the Admiralty, inclosing the. documents. Inconiseqtience of which they were no longer in his potter:44in, and that had been the cause' of his moving for the Letter and its Incitsures..At to the observe. .soon . of the:Learned,Gentleman that this was a fresh and distinti charge agaiost , the Noble_ Lord, Was not there already upon tho,.Table a charge against . . the }ion. Baronet Ways'ihere.na hardship .in that A Learned Srejeant ,(Best) had given notice of .a Motion on the subject of - the Eleventh Report ; Sod in adverting to the change tif..Notioea. that had itaken.place, his Right Honnurable Friend had only laid, that it_ was impossible for the llotite to know, *hither the. Motion would be made Or a Commit. tee of not. Mr..GNEY felt it iivpossible to suffer the House to bc..lied away by false impressions. He was sure the statement from the other eide was not carted relative to the order of the Makin* (on Thursday). HOW himself stiggensted to move.' for the Cont. mittee fires and for the, Ptosecution after. 'But he observed:ln uniform endeavour to mislead the House ; that they who supported him opposed the produltion of Ducurnents,—God forbid it was to the man n er of moving for the Documents they olije&d. He ' moo happy to,firiti that • no Gentleman attempted to Pratify the manner in which the Hon. Baronet had IPlight ,fortv ard.his M ition. The Report had been printed on the r tth March, and it Was not till the yid of April !,hat the Hun. Baronet wrote the let. ter to the, Admiralty ; Whale ;sth he gave his no. tree, and an the,a6ili he moved tot its produltion.— What was to ke_concluded, but that hei.had written the letter for the porpose , of having it, produced to ferliament if Sir ANDREWS. h'AMOND had lost no time. It was extremely late in March .when the • Report had beers printed, anti the next, day he wrote to the o,ostrtirsionere of _lnquiry. As he held a high office, it was nip slight matter that lie should stand ,eight with his lultarior,Board. He had written his letter on the tilt of April, and delivered it with his own hand to the Commissioners. On the 17th he received iheinswer, and on the 2ad he wrote to the Admiralty. 'she documents were in the regular form of dicoments from one 101rei to another, and num. leered Irvin t to to, being letters from the 'Secretary ,of State, anti ,from Earl St. Vincent, and if the Secretery of the Admiralty did not produce them with the proper titles, it was not his fault. ihe eisedips the Papers would not take tip ten minutes, e should therefore vote for the Motion. M r. 41C aN,./4.11V D should nut have risen if it had root been ha a personsl allusion to hire. Previous go she Motion which had been observed upon, he )lad,prettentetia Petition front Mr. Tucker, explain. Sig the nature of his grievances anal the Motion. The Letters 'vat then read. The first explain. ed the circumstances, of the Hop, Baronet's situation nil coltilutt, and his application to the Commis. clusters of Naval [Aug. The enclosures were Let. sers from Lord Hobart, Mr.,Sullivan, and the Earl 01 of. y t t icent. No, 3, the principal one, from Earl st. Vincent to Sir A. S. }femoral, mentions the re. ceipt of his cootrounieetion respelling the Stone Ex. redition, which he has no doubt will he well caeca,. ed; hut as the wholeexpenee was to be defrayed by the Treasury, he _saw no ()cession fur giving any of the iletaits to the Admiralty. On the Papers being read, Mr. TIERNEY said, that the Hoare was aware that for ,some time back the mast base, malignant isisinaationa, were circulated that Laid St. Vincent had been guilty of the must grosi perjury. Every Member of the Houle, particularly the friends of the Noble Lord, mutt have been deeply stetted by such a charge, It was not surprising that those who had been themselves eonvitied of delinquen. try, should wish to bring him, the author of that detection, to their own level: Every exalted charatter, when he undertakes to ref o rm abuses, must expeil to be subject to such charges. He had beard, if le coedit regularly advert to the (-intim. stance, that the Noble Lord had never either di. redly or italiratly countenanced the application of • the naval !stoney to other services. He defied the Honourable Baronet to prove that the Noble Lord unit' tmly and sedui,,usly protested against ~Jch application of the naval money to svcret ser. tr era. N 440 OiECer was to have boa) etriplOyed tile Sitikine, ut the vet eta; the wtwi lc was to have 'vett Cothitae,te.i by those belier a cquaitited with the klatch Coast. The ohjtot of the Commissionets wee, to discover whether the money pante& for Navy Service• had been applied to any othel. set t vice ; and one of the documents, the Letter. from Lord St. Vincent to Sir A. Hamond, rendered that cleir. No man could suppose that LW.. St:, /Vincent would swear that he had not known lipy thing of the Secret Expedi►ion, In his Letter the Noble Lund stated, that as the expence was to be defrayed by the Treastiry, • there was no occasion fir giving details to the 13:ard of Admiralty,— He asked the House whether any man could more clearly wash his hands of the business ? As a hinet . Minister, he must have known of an Expeili: tion projetted by the Cabinet. Here then ended, in the Isce of the Hnuse, the first charge brought against Lord St. Vincent. This was the situation in which nu man of hotiour could submit to. The Noble Lord had acquitted himself as a Naval Officer, by not employing any Naval Officer in . choaking up the Harbour of Boulogne; and as a faithful servant of the Public, in nut allowing the application of the public money to services - fur which it wa• not voted. ,He had only to return his thanks to the Hon. Baronet for having braight forward the Mo. tios which afforded the opportunity of vindicating the Nvble Lord's eharader. _ _ Mf. CANN! AG.--At the Right Finn. Gentle. man had thought it proper in title stage of the Masi. nets to take that view or the Papers, beheld it right in any man to state his opinion as to the evidence they contained. The Hon. Dirt, had moved for 'these Pa. pets for the purpose of repelling the charge of having applied the Money entrusted to him to other pur. poses than those for which it had been voted by Pat. liament, without the knowledge of the First Lord of the Admiralty. The Papers afforded the fullest and most complete vindication of the lion.'Bironet. What cffed they may . have collaterally, to warm or do away any thing'thst had been asserted else. where, he should leave to the Public to 'determine. Mr. FOX thought tha produttion of these Papers entitled to more thatiksliuto Lord St. Vin. cent's friends than they had any moon to think they should owe to the quarter whence the produe. Lion originated. It was very rip' that the Hon. Baronet should have the opportunity of producing every thing that was necessary for. his defence I.hur his objetlivn was, that the Motion was made' to stand on this ground, that Lord St. Vincent's evi. Hence was, incorrect, Whether the Hon. Baronet's ecneltid was reprehensible •r otherwise' would aft.. petit at a future time: when that time came, and all the dur.tonents were produced ) whateyei :nay appear' direaly, or come out edlaterally, he had not the smallest apprehension that any thins would appear which eoeld establish the smallest incorteetness in the condnei of L o rd Sr. 'Vincent. Tie t.;II4NCELLOR .af , the EXCHEQUER said, that this much at least indisputably appeared en the face of the Papers that had.iseen read, that the t , tnsaition that had oecasioned the expence was known to Lord St. Vincent, that he had no objet. don to the Expedition baing carried 'on, or to the manner in which it w as to be concluded in any - sense, but that the expence omitted for it should nut come. out of t h h. Navy Money. Mr. Giiii,Y said, u was most certain that Lord St. Vincent knew of, the tratisitelion„ When the question was put to his Lordship, it was only in re. harrier to the application of the Navy Money ; and in that sense, which was the only rational one, the evidence Stood unimpeaclied, Mr, WALL ACE said, if he recolleatd the con. tents of the Payers just now read, there was one in which Lord St. Vincent avowe d a distinct know. ledge and complete approbation o f the Expedition, and in which Sir A. flame:trot was not only direeted to superintend the preparatioos, but also to procure, the funds. . Mr. GREY thought this construction direttly eon. wiry to the fair sense of the Papers alluded to. Sir 4. S. II AM)IV D.—Lord St, Vincent three% the Comptroller of the Navy to issue the funds tar the preparation of the Expedition. I beg to know whether his Lordship, or any h ot ly else, could sup. pose that I was to furnish these funds out of my own pocket ? Lori St. Vincent writes that he is sarisued the preparations will be well perfedeti. k was to suppose, that with lay letter he had read what I inclosed, and given the approbation he cx. pressed to the whole arrangement. (Here the Hon. Baronet read the iliCinAllt i which was a letter from Lord Hobart, in which he was (Hutted to superin. tend thr e reparations of the Stone Expedition, to ourchase vcssela, coiled materials, arc. and to issue the necessary sums, which were to he re pl ace d by the Tre.aststy.) When the preparstiutel were eons. pieced, Lord St. Vincent expressed his readiness to provide a convoy, and to write to Lord Keith to give t-,tay assistance and facility in his power.— Tlie answer of Lord St. Vincent to him soiclobed Uoll Hoharths letter, saying, that as the expence as to be defrayed by the Treasury, it was not necessary to state the details of the pl an or prepa. ratio's to the Admiralty. M r , trA LL UCCA asked whether, after this ex. - plana'ion, what he had asserted was direttly con. trary to the fair construction of the Papers. It Was, obvious that the money was to be advanced, in the Ars' instance, by the,Comptroller of the Navy, to he afterwards replaced by the Treasury, Mr. TIERbitY said, it was evident Lord St. Vincent would not allow of the epplieition of the Navy-money to this Expedition. , ' Mr. GREY contended, that Lord Sr. Vincent on. detstood that the whole captivee was to be defrayed by the Treasury, and his Lordship protested against applying the Navy money to it. He had the au. thority of Lord Sr. Vincent to say, in his own cm. phasic language, he would have put his hand into the fire before he would consent to any such sip! li. cotton. Mr. WALLACR said, there vos nothing in the Papers betas the iloose to chew this abh9rreucc of the application such its tt was. Mr. SULLIVAN was now loudly called for on every side. He began by lamenting that he bail bed the misfortune not to be in the House when this discussion had commenced, and that, therefore, he could but imperfeftly reply to all that lied been But he was clear that the Expedition was perfeCtly known to Lord St. Vincent, and he thought it but juiiice to.t it fatties to say,. that he was pettedly .4eCIII , 41111( d the whole tranbanior4,......L„,d Si. VtGeent resided at that time chiefly in the country, 'itoti,''therefore, the communications with him were , entirely by note.. His (Mr. Sullivan's) letter to Sir Andrew Snape liamond was dated 9tli February; on-the loth Lord Hobart wrote to Lord St. Vin. eent.that for Security and expedition Sir" A. Ha mond was to take charge of the whole of the prep, rations, and to AdvAriee the funds, which were to be afterwards replaced. Sir A. Hamond prop.sed to raise the money by An issue of Navy Bills, which were to be paid off when the money for the Expedition was is sued from the Treasury. The funds thus created, were paid into Messrs. Hammersley'a Bank. He did believe, in the beginning, that Lord St. Vincent was acquainted with the whole of this arrangement. But he acceded to the declaration of partial know. ledge, because he was sure that the NJble Lord would not say that which was nut. But till he knew that hi.; Lordship had declared himself so entirely, ignor,int thise particulars,. he did believe that he was perledly aware of them. He did believe the • Hon.. Gentleman opposite, when he stated that Lord St. Vincent declared he would have- sooner put his • hand in t'Ae fire than have younte. nanced this alylication of the Navy Money. 'But certainly Lord Sc. ,Vincent did not chew any such aversion to it at the time, he supposed, from what had been said, because his , Lordship did not know it was, to be 4iolle. _ Mr. Y ANSITTA RT thought he couid, throw some light on this transaction, by stating what he knew of it ut. , rn his official situation at the time (Secte. Lary of the Treasury). Great difficulty : orate from the,miwillingness of Lord St. Vincent to apply the Nagy money to this Expedition; and there being at that time no vote of credit, the only resource that remained was, that the Comptroller of the Navy should provide the funds in the fir , t instance, and that they should be replaced from the Treasury as soon as the vote of credit passed. He was glad his Right Honourable Friend, who was then Treaauter of the. Navy,, had explained the matter in the manner he had.done. • He was sure Lord St. Vint ent was a man of honour, but without that explanation he. should have found it difficult to re. coneile the evidence a'! at he knew of the fads, though he could nit immune any improper design in Lord St. Vincent. At the same time, it was ob. vious that the Hon. Baronet stood fully acquitted by the documents on . the Table, so. far as any charge may have been male agrainst him of having acted in this business without being frilly authorised. The CHANCELLuk o f the EXCIiEQUEK supposed the House must now he satisfied from the reading of the Papers that there was no inten. tion to take the House by surprise, nor to advance any other unfair objed, and that any surmise of that kind was absolutely' unfounded. Wha , ever construdion may tut? ue put on the words of the evidence, the obvious impression they were calcu. laced to make was, that contrary to the inten. lion of 'the Noble Lord, Sir Andrew Snape Hamond had issued Navy money for services, of which the First Lord of the Admiralty knew no. thing. This eves the impresiion they had made on his Hon. and Learned Friend (the Attorney Ge neral), till the Matter had been explained. He asked, under these circumstances, what would have been the consequence if the inquiry had been stifled in the manner that Itad been proposed ? What in. jury would mot have been done to Sir Andrew Hamond, if it had been only known that he had advanced the money to be replaced, but, without the First Lord of the Admiralty having any ac. qnaintance with the t ransaction for which it was advanced ? Now it appeared that it was advanced for a iervice known and approved of by the 'first 'Lord of the Admiralty—that there was an arrange ment that it should be advanced by the Comptroller of the Navy, to be replaced by the Treasury. It now appeared, and it was a point much relied on, that in a transaction which was purely Naval, and which was approved of by the First Lord of the Admiralty, there was no objedion on the part of that Noble Lord to the plan going forward, provided the expence was not defray et) out of the funds for Naval Service, This was a new light, in which the transaction would not have been ' , laced if this discussion had not been institoted ; what the circa of it was, he should .not say. Mr. FOX argued, that Lord St. Vincent's evi. dence must be understood to be meant relatively, for it was impossible to suppose the Noble Lord to say he was ignorant of the bet of the Stone Expedition. He denied that there was any disposition to stifle inquiry, though there was a reludance to let Papers go to the PoWlic without knowing what they con. tamed, or in what they were deficient, He was positive that when the proper time came for investi. gating the matter, the Noble Lord's evidence would be found pettedly comet. The CIJANCAiLLOR of the EXCHEQUER in. ferred, that there was a disposition to stifle inquiry, because the Hon. Gentleman's Him. Friend (Mr. Grey) wished to prevent these Papers (tarn being printed or read, and even proposed to rescind the Order'fur producing them. tie did not know what the Noble Lord meant, nor slid he ascribe any mean. ing to - Mole—but the impression his evidence, would have made was, that he knew nothing of the trans. aelion, and that the step was taken without his knowledge. He cited the letters, and contended, that the Hon, Baronet had a right to coned an cr. roneous and unfavourlible impression. Mr. Gary said, the Right Hun. Gentleman had been guilty of wilful misrepresentation (a cry of Order). The SeitAxeit felt it his duty to inform the Hon. Gentleman, that the expression he had Made use of WAS not justifiable. Mr. Gut sr was very sorry that any improper ex„ pression should hive escaped him in the warmth of the moment. He contended t h at t h ere was no ev i . inquiry--on the icontrary,identeo n e very f document :c a unh Baronet,yen eh n d a t i od e r p t s an i tyt e x press ly o an couldt t to a c declared eidc stifle oa tt be dee i I m r l t i e a s t d e e d n c e o e s i n r o e o l t i l t a t d e t St. Vincent, should be produced—only wishing to regulate the manner in which such documents should be allowed to go forth. He contended, that the questions put to Earl St. Vincent were only vela. tive to the applicatiun of the money. Exc RQUalt stated, thaltlav'ehaetuliAew "Lt' hadaaidiL o , was, that there had att s e i m r p c t . t . o pu ti i. ifi l e w tl a i s es i e lo P vv ap c e a r i s ic , s f a to id m w a i ll st s il 4 l. o, been an d upon ite stated, that the obit& of the questions !IL Earl St. Vincent related solely to the apparel.: itreC gularity in the application of the money. —hen his Lordship answered th at he knew ;lathiitng of itmight .. His Lordship was then asked, whether not have been ,applied to the Stone xpeditioits n ? 00 s H t e on a e n n sw x e p re ,d d i , tio it n could g l l d dell , for the because E there w authority for such an appli cation, the money The CHANCE LLoft uftotchemEe 'it extraordinary that this explanatory q uestion, anti: )f,croHmEQtuheait'rrtehausti ira. the . answer to it, were omitted in the Repoit. • .. Sir C. PULE said, the qeestion was asked ler die purpose of assisting h is Lordship's meottOrway-.s, The same general nega tive being given, mo lt w a g " } thought unnecessary to insert the costitan in thitH'. Report. .. Mr. Honitouse called the attention of the. I•l war, 'f' to the deviation from the question, which whether the Papers sho uld be p rinted ? H e had i high opinion of Lord St. Vincent in every station; bu t before the explanation his impression was, theta he absolutely knew no thin g of the purpose to which this money had been applied. i, Admiral MAaxitAto allowed, that he and Lora 01 , St. Vincent, and Sir Thomas T tir roubri knew _ the Expedition, and once when he-expresed tow disapprobation of it, Lord Sc. Vincent said, 0 " W and I have nothing to do with it, the maney att from the Treasury." . . Lord Duti Lot t hought it strange. that the explaes. don given to Lord St. Vincent's mind by a pall' cular reference to the Stone Expedition, W40'61 1 inserted in the Report. If the question via! 1 . .- why .was it not in the M inutes ; if it was . 1 —O l Minutes, why was it not in the Report ? ~.. Sir C. Pore said, it was not put down, hee' ll6/ ,, c il en h t a ' d s mbeeemn o t r ti y t . eded merely to assist Lord -St, Via.,.' any knowledge oiTtaheb.tericaatut'eer in t hilsa'Ll onrodtshipir;sdl: ' 1411 dente. A The nTTOI.Y-GPN ERAL said, t he inistli fil : hension arose from the unhappy e circum stan ce thi .l ; the witness did not u nderstand the Auesti n of on, wh 4" i, ; , required some explanation for the dtrettio mind. The question was put down ► without expl,t,' nation, and the answer was recorded withottt quo"' fication. Thus the misapprehension W 3! in ifte I"' I). rr s without that w Itioh in,d sonic tenaen c Y 16 cbri ' feet it. Mr. 'WAtto.contended, from the time, that LO, ti been aware that St. Vi n c en t must have been perfectly aware that Or. Expedition was . chewed it; The Noble -Lord must hesid" //a i ., the Comptroller of the Navy, I to be replaced by N. . of the Commission, Treasury. state' General CAsCOIGN It, from what had bien -- 1 'the hsag by the Honourable Baronet, who was 'it C ol o was to be dvance 7,7. L tTi o ,o, r ui d yg s I t : w i t p asso well; d eb:;:evginitolnr:yod, and dist the lel missionets conceived the Noble 10 13 ' )6/6 111 1 wanted assistance and diratioti. TlieY ~n t.c. r e:I Nobl e t o admit ii)e.tilitie:rsoit'cinhttorilyielttdycG:°:eirciv‘te 'l l ia:l°6 ' 3:l;e' g't hh P he::6llel)ll'cucjil: leer of • ing, as he himself had been a Mel;,,encisi the ,gallant General eneral Court Martial on a very meritorious u d op Officer (General Innes), in which it appeii",. thin memory w ,t had b ti u l e g , tat tlY• N )hie 'Lord, for having anal upon o rdert I ° . by himself. He could therefore conceive vcrild,hlis why persons so well acquainted with his . ' - ': r ight as the Commissioners, should have thotight 1 ,4 to to assist his memory on the occasion noW a till'. ordered(a'll.fiilleigqbtu)::.sbt ques t io n p r % t . r c i a t s e dn.("v put, " t ' and tile I Yarn a ° re dhthintlo 6tc'rilit:lucbiri t ea Silt HOME POrtlAlq. , f Mr lop e ,, Mr. lINNAIRD moved, that '.., „ y d . OSP Letter be, printed ; and as frOM the tillentitiLe 030 liebti at the Printer's, he feared it the ' 7 1 0 hi, early enough to allow him to bring ro,rf It po vr Motion on the subjed on the day' fo r ,stood, the .7th of May, he should, theft° g' ' cave to fi his notice tor the tsth of IVititetheg Nlr.S, B oycele represented the Length of ti_tn obt 53 1, charges had been hanging over one of the ° l to , f e. last and meritorious Officers io the servicac old mained unemployed in onsequence. . " la „ vi a whether it would he fair to defer the bottle I.' v than the day for which it now stood ? , fathe r which r ,, be; Mr. Kit N NA! R 0 di.ClAillted the fi cal r' than in .the instance of this single rill' er • , 1 ,005 Sir li. l'OpH Aid lamented the hardsl'il' 61 0 i i litc' these charges hanging over his heini on' n t ,, , c tor . years since his return to England Iron) . a t er e " flie . which he did nut deseetie such A og v ' e w oe" B,)atd of Admiralty at the tittle Inig hl hi t " ' At / IVI ) , r : the matter tti a decision at once, by it `•;:i. Opt " 631' He begged it also to he coosidcr 'l'm JeCi. was ab _emit front his CurtliNivir 014iong.1411e 0_ Sion of this 1 IJuse, and that hip ryn_ . :,ti o oio ` further, c s l i ; \v, Pr sea without hint. After some it was agreed, on the suggeitiOn O r t 0 fbe I,,!' i 'i rowes, that the M:ition filltlttiti tir.l, ~.. ,git 05 _i With an understanding before 0 e IP that should alyear necessary that day. t hat it biIQUILI V . IP _1:-.;tivoi, ill It il [0 CORN LAW. ~, ;otic°, Lora A . H ~ on an Autt,Tras gave not,ca of nt , io , I corn early day, to move ihe HtillOC to igl'ociof relating to examine the matter of the rg L ."F to the Cure Law of the last SesgiOnsio: of 'r" Hasty POTTY &feted, tilt the ,topl May,COn his intended Motion relative to thr_r: jto not. nett in Kilmainham Gaol, Dublin. 11'01;0 Accounts lee, thou on Wednesday next he sll'old nnlj,ol4 relative to the Civil List of Scotto') particularly the Grants by f A rent. :A The c tlQ WRY. #or i t w HANCELLux efthe IiXCIINCIPOIIOvist firs Quid be recolleeted that when the VI," a „, Itt t ut to him, he stated, Oat if it 00'7 nig ttit foundcomnecessary, h e ,hould nos wish to pro;!,,opi bat i ni r issi" oh Navas Inquiry beyond dos : ij 0 ,,,t it should be found necessity he °pod willingly continue it. Finding, at thii, ', 0 ,0 , of the s c3 • h .1 ► t'ent4lo"),,,t, oHon; t At 1111.14, I dune by the C • - h h olkl 01‘)411 e' ncwal tionnistionere, e b 0., ~rd hhiji , duc , of the Cononiaeson, as the ttitito 7 otei 7 might eu much valuable information, sold* 40.. gilt disaPptove f - ht in Ill" g'' , the Com u mabr ir . °tt. ottestonere, lie shooing it ilvat