The Sun. — London, England, 1805-03-13 00:00:00

LI3NIENT. DOUSE PEERS. TUstirJ Y, 14ARCH 12. M. AID 4t2 was heard as Counsel in the Appeal, the Earl of Kinnoul, Lord Gr:ty and others, against the Hon. Mr. Maule, of Paumurc, and others. The. farther proceedings were postponed till to-tilOrroW, - I*4:e Royal Assent was given, by Commission, to the Loan Bill, the Postage Duty Bill, the Quarantine Bill, and seven .Yrivate Bills. JUDGE Fox.: - A •conversation of some length arose on a point of form nonncded with the_roceeding% on the Corn. l taint against Justice Fox. It appeared, from what pa'oed, that the only written complaints before the Committee ivere the Petitions of Mr.H3rt, &c. and that.the ©trier for appointing the Committee re. (erred to their consideration,in getteral, the mat. uts alleciAed against Mr. Justice Fox." It was. necessary, thecefore, before evidence could be re ct•ived aft },Brits not - included in the P.etitions, that the severel matters' alledged siMuld be specifically referred to the 'Committee. Ti•ie Marquis of A tiattcoit br began the cow/m -.3.460n by stating, in Consequence of the general understanding which prevailed yesterday, he should read the arieles of complaint, against Mr,' Justice Fox.. Noble Marquis then, read P:iper con., taioing tits.: same charges he had before' stated to the .1 ~,sty/ /LUC:ELAND olnerverl, that he was en. itietl to - consi,ler this its •an Original proceeding, a lid, tib:ri.'t to Ole mn.lct of condueling the inquiry, in the sinie.manner as lie Would have been at Itl)erty• to do had the. present ,beer the htst time the' ques. • tiara WaS i)gl(;tlC.,s in'the klouse. The Noble Lord then urged . , that : on a cotnplaint of this 'nature it ~ t vOuid always be preferable for Parliament to' proceed by wIIY of impeachthent. A Judge ho placed in a very disagreeable situation were 'the pretent proceedings to estaldish this prece. drit, that any N?ble Lord might stand up in his place, Ord, merely ut ri dn general - 1010rinItion and hearsay, , rencier it iiec,:ssary for their Lordships to investigate Atte persona tilling SO titnt a situation. wr re abOut 160 •Mernhers of that Ilio.pot, 6944 of cclwm 'might - at any time bring, forward 1,.4<r0h e-Int.tge, ; aid as the other Ilouse of ~Parliat rent bo called- upon to concur in.any, Ad. ttcms t.rr removing, or tnight vote an Aeldress'in the first instance, it followed that each ant of 658 per. sous who compused the House of Commons, could also at pleasure- promote a proceeding of this kind. His Lordship thought this was a'situition,in which Magistralea, having inch important duties to . perform, ought not to be plated. observed, that ,the :Ad oi:' , Settlement had given Parliament - the. option of, prpcceiling by the mode of Address, and , th3t, according to the princifiles cm 'which the N,:bie Lora argued, omit:lnk .sZiort 01 the repeal of t h at Att 14. , .1t1id satisfy Intl). • it the mode' of. Address Svtio .11rOCICLVOWS must be commenced in one liont.e of Parliament or the+ other. , Haetilie. ~t , r oee edin g ; in the resent c.:lse conatnenced in the, if„, ) „,„ haii•their Lordships been etdl,!ii upon ,i';,;:cor.'in an ,A:!citess, it aeenaed that' their 'Lortimhipti could .not have adopted any other mode of investigation' „than .that which they now putsmid . . The paper read by the Noble Marquis was merely the,':;ubstance of. what he had stated in antl.thz Noble liaron.would recolleel that. lie oifereti in that Speech to prove the charges by evidence.. Lied ALICkLANr. Way rising to explain, when St...ilk:it:. observed, that he wished' to-speak to order; _for, if he did not mistake, there was 00 . 'Motion,before the Uprise. The Ik:hatpin of Alit ItColl.t.t said, the , Noble .lialon c,Aranenced his speech before lie had riale tic vat which he should 04w sub m i t to theist Lirdshipa. He, then, in the form of a ltesolu. cion, moved, that the Articles he had read be re. , , fated to the conimietee. 'appointed to consider of the Petits. of Mr. Hart, complaiiiing of the contlAct of Mr. jugicc: I ,l ‘,ixi one Of His Nisjesty's jitilg SPANCAR then rose, and stated his rea_ sons f,? preferring the' mode of Impeachment to .that , As ilk, pr4:4:cC4irigt. in the present ta..,e, ii:r.vcvcr, -gotht so hi, he should not op. pose the pet c' Itelottoo, being , con Virieed apt it was abintotely neossary to cirme speedily to sortie COntitaon, many ohjeotioos to establish. stag p't‘CtJelt, by v. inch the iipeech of . a Mernlicr of the: II Attie tnight be put into 11 4 6 kind of s u b_ uric, enacted upon the Journals; but, for'the t ea , ,dos had. stated . , he should wave these obj:.e.tic . no. He thought. fluvserei, that the articles of 60,11 ; 4001r ought not , to bus/iglu! before the Cot o:it:et: in a double form r both in the Petitions and she Re.4.olut tort now moved. Lord I••;JiWKaseUttli. suppOrted the Motion, and uriied the I .;ropr tari of ley it all the trtatteti, alledged agati,st Mr,: justice Fefrx. in a specific form befare . thr Coanni t te.c. i„,o r d ELLE N4'0;1(.1(14111 would have'preferred the meek of feripeachwent had not the present course' Leen ad' 'rlie Way in which their Lordships • proCeeden was, ' however, pi'lletily legitimate Older the Ael referred to, In order to meet art oh, j ction stated by a .Noble earl, he moved as An tha: only bUch part of the matters al. 4.4.,...ain5t Mr. Justice Fox, as were not con. t,,=inert in the Petitionsi should be -referred to the. C:orntriltlee , 1..0ti1 A UcxLAND explained; after which, the Ms amended by Loll] Et.i.ENBOROUCti; W. J::icezi I‘).—AdjuUriled. HOUSJ 0 dOfrimoNs. TtlitiDAY, M/111C1 . 1 12. Ttie Al' the Committee On. the Letacy Duty Bill was' raazt, anCt ortttcri to be pov purled till Friday next. Mr, Ga El/ witihett'that the EMI shoithl be [nutted, which Mr. ;;T oases Dot) ecN t was rcAtlY.to agree to, if the stiittY of tin. trade could aliosv it to be tioislied in any reaso u v,hic t i me . 'fbe Deputy. Usher of the Bllek Rod appeared a t t h e B ar , act d suhinifolext thc I louse to the Homo of ficers, in order to bor kl is ;vla . je:,l)"4 , Commiction read. St e.. 4 ix, on his return, declared, that the Royal As hJhcari Aiven to the reilowirg Imo •I'he wemy :two T.0,30,11iii, the PeAage Duty Bill, the Quarantine the Manches,ter Cabal and Surrey Railway iffils; KNARE'SI3OROUGH , ELEC T ION , Lord ikt.t. Russsw. observed, that as the Report Of the' Conuninec had only beet) i priated that Iflutnin4, this clay would be too soon to call upon the House for, any decision the business of the Knaresborough ' 1 " , *OO 4 , moved that the-Order for taking the KetoottintbeonsiderktiOdC' .thisdav should tieditelnirgecltand fixed for triursday: 'ite.g4ste • notice that on that day he would move that the several•per sonti.who had been accused of riotous priidices, with s view to prevent the Election of a Member of Parliament for Knares borough, should be prosecuted by the Attorney-Geueral: • Mr. S. Bourtos wished to know if Counsel had been hearti before the Committee, and whether the Committee Ind coitus'. to any decision ? , Lord WM. Russitt said, that they had aded exactly as a Grand f ury. The Strtmcza said,there W 36 nothing irregular in the Mode of proceeding proposed by the Noble Lord. The Order was accordingly postponed till Thursday. Sir JOHN ANDAJCSON brought up a'Bill to regulate the Baking and Assize of. Bread. Mr. FRANCiS moved, that the Correspondence between our Indian Government and the Nlegul of Delhi should be .printed for the use of the House.—Ordered. . Mr. BAG w std. gave notice, that on'Thursday he would move for leavelo bring in a Bill to regulate the Elections for Members.of. Parliament in Ireland. 1. Z . v ' a Y Postponed tilt Tuesday_ next his Motion re. lative to Mr. Fordyce. MUTINY BILL. ' On the'Motion that the . Mutiny Bill should bo read a third time, •Sir Rosetta BurroN complained of Jim hard. ships under which the Proprietors of Canals labour ed, in being obliged to carry Soldiers and their Biggar along tbe Canals. The SECRETARY at WAR oserved, that they had been freed from the buithen of carrying stores, and thettfore he thought, that unless in cases where it might be of serious injury, to their trade, they might very well agree to carry chi . Soldier's anti • Baggage. In cases where it was of material injury tit) them, he, for pee, would be very so give them . compensation. The'Bill was then read a third time. The SlcitSTAItY at WAR brought up a Clause to be added to it, which wens to give the power' to Reg imen:a 1 Courts Martial to take evidence on oath, and to have their own Members sworn. "The Clause being read a lost Cline, and the form of the oath stated,. General FITZPATRICK obsirved, that if the Clau;e in 'question had had the smallest 'tendency to telax military discipline, he would be the last m to to propose it ; hot he was sure, on the con !pry, that it would only . give more inlemoity, weight, and authority, to the Courts Martial, and promote the ends o f discipline. The Mutiny laws ~ were severC; Dot in proportion as they were severe . . . it was necessary that they should be Wein* - anti impartially administeyed. When all should be con s vinced that they should have it fair trial, 'the laws would be more cheerfully obeyed., This principle : was sustrungty felt in the Austrian, and,he believed, in the Swi:.s servi;•e, that even Non.c:onmissioned Officers and private Soldiers were admitted to 'sit on the Courts Martial. He defended this point also on. the ground that Regimental Courts Martial bad de.' . v wed, in bottle measure, from their original ptiwets, • and tried higher crimes under different names, which were propfrly cognizable only by General Courts anti also upon the protetlion which the Soldiers would derive from having Suttlers and others, who might bring vexatious aceusatiO'ns, agninst them, examined on oath. There was an. other point which he was sorry he could' not carry, which' was, 'that none should preside at any Court Martial who was nor 2I years,of age. 'He thought that no one ought to be a Captain in the ..Army fore that age. Sir y,nri S PULTE2VEr opposed the Clause, on the grounds' that the long established prsttfee in the Army ought not be altered without the matureet . deliberation. The Sh:CRET44I,I' at WAR defended the Clause on the,grounds that an innovation had been made by the Courts Martial taking cogni zance of higher crimes under different names. It was time, therefore, that the evidence against the Soldier should he examined with : the solemnity of an oath, that the ponialuncot , for perjury might fol. low doss upon falsobtoti. lie had consulted several, General Ofiicers, who .were, lor, the mu9t, part, against the Clauie, but they had iillidged: nu suf. frzient - reasons,' He could not agree to have none as President of a Cour't Martial who was not 21 years of age, on 'account of the inconvenience which it would produce. Lord TEMPLE opposed the Clause, on the ground th,ll, , as thr Regimental Courts Martial wertt not Courts ofßecorda, the punialtment for perjury could oat follawit the wittiesseg EN ore falsrly , The SECI% ) .IIT4RY at 4 7 4'R Oltservett, that if there wai•any-dahibt 'un that point, an Amendment ought 10,1)e..,enade, • • Mr. STU,RGES BOURNE said, that they might certainly be intlttAttl for INrjury. Sir Ll' RE coot E &Eluded the Clause, because it gave greater solemnity to Cotirts Martial. The bl-1;.:& was the discovery of truth, and how could truth be mare efreaually discovered than by putting , the witneasea on oath ? 111 r.; FULLER was of opinion that' the Frei"dent should be of age, but Minded the Clause.. Gen. LOFTUS' spike . in hiltuur . of the efavie. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER agr?•ed in the propriety of the Clause, though he regretted that he differed in ()Onion from so many able Officers. He could not conceive how the oath co►uid be prejudicial. The discretion of the Qffieer was the same, and the evidence, would be the same. —He agreed, that if the pratlice4 of the CoUrts of Law, with reaped to evidence, was tube followed, it might he dangerous. He agreed to the Clause, because it was just in itself, and not because there was any complaint.; Lord DE BLAQUIERE wished that the powers of Regimental Courts Martial should be mote li. Sir tr ATKIN WILLIAMS WYNNE was of opinion that none should be ?resident of a Court Martial who was not two years in the !,crvice, or who was not at years of age. Col. FRANXL-AND thought that the Chute would have a had tendency, lay rendering the in. vestigatii , n of smaller faults 41111011 r iMp11)111ble. Col. STEWART thought r the' Courts Martial' ought to - he fuller, and then the Oath, might he of ad vantage. General STE WieRT rose merely to state, that he did not wish to take. credit for the Speech which his ;Hen: Friend (Cul. STEWART) Made op a termer occasion, which many supposed to .be his, ,on 4C. count of the similarity of the name, He could not agree to have the Courts fuller, on account - of , the Ikcpnvenience that would attend the bringing tnge, titr of the ()Ricers., SiriAtlf ES PULTP.ATE'fihnught that in stmller matter no Oath would be required, and in greater crimes, His MAJESTY might grant a Warrant fur examining. on Oath. Sir 1011 V WROTTESLE I Y opposed the Oath, oh account of , the'vexatious proceedings which it might giye ro pettyfogging Attornies: ,Genera FITZPATRICK spoke alew words in reply. , After which the Clause was read a second and third time, and ordered to be added to the Bill by' way of ikider",—The Bill was then pasetf. HUSBANDRY HORSE DUTY BILL. 'rho CHnrcELLOK of the ExcHr.contit moved the Order of the Day for , the second reading of the ilusbandry Horse Duty Bill. The Oilier being/read, Mr. PLOHEIC_ apposed the Bill. Relined to 'say that the Right Han. Gentleman who brought in this did it with the best intention ; but if he' took 'his information frOM thoie who were hest able to give..it to him ; be would find; that the class of per. sons on whom this Bill was intended ' t o o p trate were really not able tri bear it, for chi boayof Far. mess taken collUtively was by no means such a rich body as had been often represented, and. particularly in .that House. The Duty now propOsed'of 75..6d. • each Horse would 'make the wholA acis..esch Horse employed in husbandry. The great inc r ease iri 'rent genetally throughout England, and the Other charges attending the business, wets ;nth that he" had no scruple to say that the mass of nirtncis•were , not able to bear this impost.' It was true; !kat the price of corn was very high, but if it were not, so, the small Farmer could nor live;. an d did not scruple to say, that when corn was sold at 8 of 9;. a bushel, instead of its present price, the tittics Were altogether better for the. Farmer. This Tax, it was said, would'fall on the consumer ultimately,; so it might, but the learinerfmight be undone be_ fore things would find their level in. that way. He knew that Taxes must be imposed ; he ought .to be ashamed if he did not feel it ; but he must resist that, which, in ,his opinion, might crush a whole glass of men ; for these reasons he Was obliged to oppose this Bill. CibiNCELOR of . ..the EXc REQUE4 most•ably defended the Bill. He really thought it '.would not produce the pressure . , which some.Genile 'trier, apprehended. He believed the „Tax would fall on the Consumer ; and the increase • it.would create in the price of the article of corn would amount to a sum so. trifling, that no one could think it any inconvenience to arty body, Ti n s whole of the Duty Was estimated. at 300,0001. one-third of which would he borne by those who kept' 'Horses for trades in large towns,,.Brewers and the, like, so that the whole amount of the . thity Husband ry was only 200,0 00 1. The amo u nt of the rental of England, atone wi!s thirty,.seven millions ; 'including Scotland it was foity, millions sterling. The pro. duce of land had been calculated 'under the mark many years ago, and since which great improvements had been made; in no case was it calculate d at ) ess than three' time s t h e rent ; i n m a n y i t was five and six,times that amount ; but taking i ttnuderately; at ' four times the rent, the annual produce would then -he one hundred and sixty millions sterling. • •i‘row, this Duty was only one 7soch part of that produce on the whole, average of the Kingdam 'l, and taking the bill in the most objedionable shape in which Gentlemen chnsed to put it, that was, distinguishing the arable from pasture land, and coking it ,to lfe snore on the arable than on the pasture, it. would then i?{) 'one zoooth part of the produceof flip; pas. turage, one sooth on the arable land,' and this, coniputing - ooe quarter of corn to each individual in the kirrhinio . the year would amount only to an additional charge of three.halfpence per annum, a sum, he apprehended, not so alarmirry j norany thing likely to check the growth of corn. 'Mr. PLosac it :explained., • • •,` CO.A.'ff,. of Noitiilk, 'opposed 1.7,e Bill .as a very impolitic measure in discotirigi!.g aggicol. ture. Sir IV, W. WY NNE opposed the Bill very warmly, as- tending to check induary and improve. m:nt in the art by which life was most immediately supported. Its inzquality was otlioui l. because where Ole, l an 4 was hilly an d barren double the number,of Horses were necessary to tharof a rich so that the Tax rose in proportion to the in. ability,of the party to_beat it. Mr. P/IT observed; that all Horses under thir. teen, hands high were 'exempted, and email Farms below a given value were not touched 'by 611 Inca sure. Mr. PDXoPposed the Bill as en additional tax on land, with the additional objeCtion of its being a Tax on arable Land, in contrudistinaion to pasture. `lt was not the intention, but it certainly, would be the effra, of the Bill to di4courAge industry in the tiltage of the earth ; it was therefoie impos. sible for him to do otherwise t han oppose the Bill. Air, PIT(' said, it was p ot regular for him to re peat the reasons he had alledged for the Bill ; t h e Honourable G ent l eman who had just spoken l% had not IttOrd them; for he was not in the House ; if he had, he should have been glad to bear his answers to thorn, • Mr. 11. WILLIAMS opposed the Bill, as most partial and oppressivr, Mr. DICKENS thought the Bill a severe addi. dun to the Property Tax on the Farmer. Mr. GILES considered the Bill as a breach of faith towards the Farmer, whose p ro pe rt y T ax vv " estimated on three-fourths of his rent. Mr. CANNING thought this last argument was oile of those which, by proving too much, proved nothing, tor it went to chew t h at h erea f ter Parlours are never to be tax e d at all, whatever burdens may fall on any other classes of the comm. tity. rs, GR AY opposed the Bill as most il i arterous to agriculture. The ATTORN4Y GENERAg, supported the Sin, and observed, that it was nor merely alledg. ing was dangerous to aviculture that proved it to be such t he thought it much too moderate to have any bad ereet on husbandry. Sir RO.BERT BUXTON professed 'Lis inclina. lion to support Government by assenting to all ne cosary TAXO3 3 but was under the necessity Of op, • posing this ,measure, being convinced it was partial and' oppressive 'on the liguied.jaterest.. • Mr. 'll AST AR D 'wished to support Gnvernnlerg with .'l'aes to: meet the exigency of a nts. but NI .by raising the price of bi'read an d starving the Poor; he wished to see our . Military F tiro well Supplied, but not by making men soldiers beeole they could not sexist %slalom enlisting. fie wished to seek large'rifiny iarrecrib this co untry, but not out of the distresses of Isis countrymen ; arld Eick would clad of this Bill he therefore o p. posed.it, • • Mr. FULLER„ said a few words on thcprice ci corn... .. Mr. SP ENCER ST ANI,IO PE did not Pre .with man y of the arguments be had hoard but objeaed to the Bill, 'beeause it would lobo an .unequal pressure on ropleOf the same &scrip, lion; 'operating. mars severely upon poor land than . upon rich, ibeCatise 'the tillage of •the one required' greate-rnianher of horses than the other. . cl J c V l u r ia . t il io qj o K f / . 3 l l l o .R N ig idefended the Bill, *HI the Friend tilt CON . C ELLOR' or the EXCHIQUER. Mr. Corr explained. ,Mr. opposed the till, from s 1 04 , ° ' t ion it would .be - highly , injurious to agriculture; tir forjnei duty of f2s. 6d. had, 'to his knovvictigli could not ready an injurious - 14 Ra. . ' • i s t oppose)ir. BAKER oppose) the 13114 0 . o n the gro4n3t. it would diuriite :twit severely.onsrnallF4rlnlfi, 11° . elitild ' not ~ p 3 f . their rent, ,ant . therrbre t he l t cou ld not wait to. .ipectllAteon the price of ill a rj,icit.: leep, heir Corn,,..but 'must s ell it, 0 , o f The House divided.—For the second reaalg the Bill 73 —AVinst it . 6 ' - VI . '' ' y aPia il ` 7 „--.. aptly . Hill, 3. . . On re_admission of S S t A r!'in T iets, , Ai trl The CILINCELLOR of the EXCilEleiwwl was stating. certain Regulations in the Doi s'„' Salt, and of his intention to nuke •a ce rldi(lVt‘: l; rrtinnate -allowance for that which was Oti de , i , Scotland, :reserving to himself' the power of Pr ° /,, i sing further regulations i n th e., cours e of al' ne- Sessinn if . upon , irluiry, that should be dccalc dt ' c ' Ct9sary. it nf• . Mr. KINN AIRD observed, that this exP og on had rendered it unnecessary for bill' I° pun thenytice he,had given upon the subjea. ,61 . Sir W. YOUNG made g ime o b ie ryation , "" ( ii , policy of abandoning not only, this, but , al l 9 ,:rini Provisions, the' articleof Salt employca "y i , f lit Provisions, especially of Fish ; he 00140 i v k ri - 01l . whole of our coast Miht thereby ber' in i : cal b p e re ts se e , r t n e urs . Ar e ies for our s Seamen than .61 "„, e i r otto of ilB5, 1 79 1 raontdedi 8a o lie t , I s e t po a ti r n t s s , of tb t a ls t e s Cf.: o , not a proper objeft of taxation. - . , being Sir ROIL BUXTON supported this 13:1, s' o p a Bill which laid, the Tax on QonsittnPlii°ll; - let' appeared to hito the most equitable Ptilic , P -- l major): -- . a . statement Mr; ifi YN i Ar o rrne E° r P ; P y o m ml a d de in c ite 9•Eniti"CsCrt:tifh4Cliel4 ° I l i: i amity of the rich t itan consumed more S Alt 'i ; 111) portion thin that of the poor, ' , ~,,f tol l ;11r.ROSEinsisted on the accuracy 0 ' "" statement, _ b 0 111$ „... . . A. lung ' c"'Persation Ahen.took place V„,bo operation of thi s n e w Doty in Scotlan d. ' q ,cgi: Mr.' Ki Nva i n , Mr. Toßsqiisit, t lie w l , t o -TARy at W mt, 41 . 4 ,;„," ~,,., , , ~,e pr ior t ria . A 03.114 LOOK 1,. part. . ' . . . 'tp, 0 tli g The CHANCELLOR ..,/, the EXC L i - ,',3t' a ' 'p a r i o d l o:l3 h r e t t h i t e o i n e in e: c s i r e e t d o a i se v i l i t p h o e n E D y: 1 e ln Y ri n I l i i i n .- SC b oi t n y i a u e ( i - 9 : ;„ e g‘Hr S si 5:I. — Majority fur the Bill. • . 4 On tbe a ue r a l t r on il TAX 13T" :Ibi" 11/141111 being kyllt tor. t he , of the Bill, . 'nit 11It 3 I Mr• 10X rase, to enter hi , Pr ote4 t a gr.o ,, g l principle of incre as i ng t his Tax by a P er „ - a sel L I : ci wh u ie n ,h u l y n . ight' in future years he so far In ' in l' to , stiike at the stan( i l of ail the pnverty.oo,o He thought that 'Tag, ta n ug d! h e t nbotignionWgto°blethinecWrea3sreklil.' it ‘wllia'ichlivll:ll)i c°llr: late advai l s i d d b A y iCELL°R V. the 41C"- ak at) ,, li ci t P h lli c a v in e e r, rit a t i o was M s. r ta . k s l that il was i u 'Pent° The nci,ilico l rose C° cut er his Counter-protest agsina t I , wal l , tie itself up, in .the coinag" ein i a tit a War.by'thq'arnount of the-'l%,x that $ 11611 ,01 113 ' however sufficient for a War Tax. Parliairefildoll were riot . imposed than 'c t a h r e e required. '' . Oil IP ' The Bill Was then read a third tillie. „ 0 Lord TEMPLE brought up It question that it should ras3, iter" t ' l ing Subaltern Officers from this TaX on / 141 , toy Incomes. • : • . . The 'CIiAItrCELL OR i h EX - JA °' e 1 e CloD e disapproved , pproved of this exemption, and thc, „oil , negatived. The Bill then paseed.--AJP Zigtyreaotferititic tiougi , MAILS, n 1 l i s aiw- Altßiv zu—ri Haroliarglt, a Dublin wur - ‘ 1 ~, f „ r for . zGottenburgh, 1 Lisbon, .4 " 4.-- .ClaUSe:_:l,rak,iii;v,i:,llpoli, PRICE ()F THIS ',AY AT rw COnS9IS ••• 48 k Oroniurn T 1:1 F SV N. ~ SOLES; Qu DiCUIOALSOI -- ' .---' ___,...-- L,O N D .14r, "Dx l lBDttif, • mARCII 13 , I°s' ‘ llt b°J'e: d,iii ;V : a ifity y o : t t r ii r l ' i d ei p a y t h a e n n c ou e :e r d ;on t h: aryl" vv c d ::: 1 i ii i i l l : W ,,, 4rd.'"lti'll East Intliamcn wider the cu"il,l:lll'i' figigi' f i itoin Madras Citizen" Extriiii" ite0 ,,1 6 , 1 ' , private —'qters, to lay before oat tt% the it'articular; f the . • en 4 •- ° gAliAnt Attion feet'" o t. : tigr;ori and Admiral LiNor., in the 1111/ti , si t l' et ''', l gone, . an d two Frigates, - o'' 614 in urns s o. Q 0 mrelltil to rettcat wol) dlipice. s a le th r o II ti • C At 31n ta r ,