The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-16 00:00:00

Oireo' . in the Naval Service of the East inr,1.11.. Company, and from the Chairman, Directori &c, of the East India Dock Company, in iavour of the Company'sclahns. ..:I\ll% , Alderman Co MBE presented a•Petition to the ittirie effect, front 10,000 Merelm»ts, Manu factufers, and others, concerned in the Exyort Trade to China , and India, from the Port of London. The Marine Mutiny Bill was brought in,•read first and ordered to' be. read a 2d time to morrow. .The CUANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER, in con sequence of the wish expressed by Cientlemenoh the other sicle Vriday last, postponed his mo tion for the House resolving itself,into 'a. Com mittee on his Finance Resolutions from this day till to-morrow. / The SPEAt ER took occasion to inform the House that two ballots -stood for to-morrow, and that it was also• the day appointed 'for calling over the names of the defaulters of last Thursday. The Sinecure Place Bill went through a Corn maw ; the Report to be received on Monday. ROMAN CATHOLIC CLAIMS. On the motion of Alt. Gailtot,, Mr. GER and another Member, whose num we could not heat, were added to the Committee, frit pre paring and bringing in tbe.Bill on'this important subject. , Mr. M.linurn- inquired of thc Right Hon. Gen tleman when it wits likely that the Dili would be brout,ght font , ird, aii-1 what , eourse of proceeding v,ds intended theyenpon Mr. GRATTAN said hii,intention wait te? bring it in, in order to nave a firs.t.and 4cC.611( 1 4 rending be fore the Baster recess, and the dkcussion in the Committee to tac..pface after that peril d. Sir J. C lirve.estnyv gave, notice of his intention to move fin- its being referred to :a Seleet i Com- Mit tee. Mr., GRATTAN again stated what-hiii intentions were,, though they might he altered by circum stances. Thc Report ef the . Supply was brought in, and the Resolutions on the Navy LAT - mates agreed to. Mr. CRrRVEY postponed his notice relative to the Paymaster of the Forces' Bill, till to-morrow week, On the Motion of Mr. GRANT, a statement of tliepure silver &Ind allay in all Tokens issued by Ole Bank siocc the restrictions from paying in Site de were iniposed, was ordered to be laid before the kloll c. The Petty Larceny Bill went through n Com nittge, the Report to be received to-morrow. Mr: Rose presented a PetitiOn - frOrp the. Boyal College of Nhy,sicians n London, against the Apo thecaries' Bill, which was referred to theConimit tee thereon. _ _ Tbe Bill is to he react a second sin= on Friday senpight. THE VIUNC,ESS or walts. who, at a preceding period ift,the evening, had 'inquired if the -Noble Lord (Castlereagh) would be in his plate in the course of the night, as ha had Imporra.nt questions to `..put to tiiilw, nu* rose, on seeing hjiryin his place, and • rr I a n de,,iroits to put one or two . rptestions to the. NOble Lord opposite, on a nubject which, I had hoped, the diseliss.kons which took plitet in this flow,ie oW the week before hist, had set for ever at rest. ; Bat the titrunit and indignation excited *. thinp*eptly oublished.--the djs,guit created' . by dieelosiires made ,iii two .Newkpapers under the influencli •of the - 6gteernment—tbe rumours • and COn liltuications respecting me and the Nohlb.L.Ord, which luive'coine forth, leave no ground fo the stippoSition, that matters. can- rest' where they now itre, but QII tht!,Cfltrill'imil ' elV that they must came ti) a crisis. ratter these cirettinstaeces,l rise to ask the. Noble` Lord, whether the Prince Regent, under advice ,has given anynotiee to the law-officers of the Crown, to proi.e.eute Lady Douglas for'perjury? I also desire the r Noble Lord to inform me, it lie • knows, and if b.- does not know, 1 require the in. 1 format ion Iron' any other Honourable Nlember who may In ii tie to supply Inc %vial it ?—I desire to' know if Ltdy Douglas has, between the 12th of irefirattry and the lith of March, been exionined by the f.inlieit or of the Treasury, and before it Ma giitrate, .tife presence of Sir John l)unghts , I de6ire . to fri)in the 'isioble Lord, or feinn any . other Ginitletnan who may know the fact, whether or not theme examinations have been ,continued, and are still going nu'? 'and I pot these questions' with the • view, if 1 ant 'answered by t'..e Noble . , Lord „ or by others, of giving notice of the proceed 'lugs which 1 may deem it right to institute on the sitbject." Lord CASTr.ftßtgAan said--" I am sure the House would feel that I was guilty of a derelie tion of my 'Duty, were I° answer to the Hesnotir abie Genllentan, .unless I knew the nature of thn proceedingswhirl' it may be his intention to pur site; decline giving such answers : and the' more e•pecially nOw that the Honoitrable Gentleman' 'has informed us that be ifuresees • mat• tern must be brought to a crisis.' I wish to know frottitlik Honourable Gentleman what is the course of proceeding he intends to take %," • , Wirrorane,tet.,... ,, I have no objection to in . - li:ty the,Noble.l.eurtlpprin Ibis point. I think the Pyineess of Wales 'must either - be Iwought to •trial or Lady Douglas be frtisectited for perjury,-- hear 1)--1:11'e.Prince of Wales came to this House, and threw herself. oh, the ivistlom of - Parliament, , and notwithstfinding the means taken to prev,ent it, the whole discussion that en- • stied lipotr that occasion has gone forth. and is kpown to the tvorld, The declaration orher in nocence by the Noble Lord is knOWn. Sir John n ot M it s in consequence of this, Waited upon me, ittla upon the Noble Lord, and his application and FlL.wt M' . (not troth p me, f or 1 rurnisneu 110 copy id it to any one) have been published in, the public vipers. When lie called upon me, Su J. Douglas, t old mar that he coucci'vcil he and Lady Douglas were trcarkal gr'eatesthardship, as Lady DoUglas had been examined 'as a witness on the very eve of t.htw day r ill wvllicit nit! Noble -Lord had declared •, her iti this llowiti - to be a perjured -- and degraded woln.in. John Douglas alto told use of the 4epotitions before the 'Magistrate to which lisive. alluded 5 arid that himself and Lady Don ghts: still pt4Sisted in the truth or,thvir statementi respecting ilte . PrineeliS of Wales. Ile also in. formed ate that ba,,titikat. to approach this house, upon which I observed, that I was SUE no Mem ber of Parliament would reritse to present his pe tition. As to the second question, whether- the Prince Regent, under advice, has instructed the Law °dicers of the .Croivn to prosecute Lady Douglas for pcdury, I am, sure the Prin cess of Wales -must he uoividered. to be inno cent by all the world, and by the 'Noble Lord and the Prince Regent; but if not,' I am stioe that her guilt might not to. be inade apparent through newspapers, but by'a Message from the Throne to Parliament.' This, under any. circum-, stances, would he incumbent on,Mintsters, but it would be peculiarly incumbent upon them; placed as the Prince: Regent was in being Regent, if guilt-can he inarted,•' to come With the charge directly to the arliament.. If I lind that they do not prosecnte*Larly Douglas for per . jury, I shall deem it : my duty, to move, that an humble, Address be . presented to the Prince Regent to give. in to his Law Officers to found that pco ceeding on such part of her testimony in 1806 as May appear jastly liable to that accusation. - Lord CAStLEREAGII ackirowledged that thelion.. Gentleman had candidly stated his opinions, and added, '' This statement has confirmed me in the determination, that it is duty not to answer his question,. nor to afford Nailer information on the topfes he, has urged, until they are regularly brought: sander the consideration of the House. WHITBREAD Stlid—r." The Noble Lord has satisfied, himself that he has done his duty in re fosiirg to i.nswer me. I addressed my iptestiotis to °Eh& Gentlemen, if there were Tiny present capable at giving ine' infornnition. The Noble Lord has - declined answering me. I now re peat my.trtestions, and put them .ttA others. I ask, fist, tht Prince ; Regent has,: under ad vice, given instructions to 'the Law. Of to prosecute Lady Dougl aS , for pt rittry ? condly, if Lady Donglas has ,been 'examined by the Solicitor of title Treasury, and a Magistrate, from the 12th of Fehruary to tbe.tith of March, that very.day on which _the Noble Lord, in his phice, declared her to hey., perjured atnd degraded wo:nan And I ask, thirdly, if not of tite - Nobl'e' Lord, (as. I am übt sure ,he possesses a competent know, ledge - on that point, Si. John Douglas having in- • formed me be stated to him he was not acquainted with it), of others, td whom 1 put it, whetlier,Sittee- .1 the, nth of lq•ctrch, exutninations into oldlnatter, or new proof of cria!itutlit)i, have., or have not been.' instituted ? recei..eqto answer,frOrn the Noble Lord, who thinks it his duty t 6 deny me, or from any Other Ilutiouiable person, I will content My self with doing toy duty, .and will on:Wednesday ; next execute tzryptirlsose of m(,viug for an Address; to .the effe`.44 have' already stated . , to. the Prince Regent.: I dm .certain that the, public mind 'can-, not hear to, he contaminated as. it has been; 6r,, endure 'the ferment that is excited, V ant ceriatti, that it wilt deinand 'justice On tfIC P.ripcess of Yialet; if. guilty; or upon those who havo'aocusecr her, if she'lleJonoctint.'! Lord Ciiier,LEßrA4a saitl-#.-`,' see no reason, oar will any reason,: ran' will any remarks of the. :Hon. Cientlemati force me to depart from the , eau:-se I have laid down for my conduct, .Which would not be warranted. in doing- by nny reports adthsted; by the Hon.. Gentleman. respect,, however, to disclosures, and the . Willey . done .to public feeling, the: Hon. Gentliman will ' permit inc to say, that the resporiiihility.of illl rests upon those win{ 'first . origiliated 'the produc-, tion of these documents.!--The Gentleman hithself has. deeply to answer for these things • which he thuS condemns. He was the.first to read and publish prole& extracts and statements of thicinnents which ought never to have been read at all- , -but which being read, and making a partial itnprcssion on the !Odic, the whole injury resulting from them, and other productions ,crin 7 sepient•epon them, Is to be attributed to the ori gloat authors.. of any, clielosures." Mr. :Ylrflivetteo-; (who evinced 'considerable' agitation ;throughont this conversation, .with warnith) , --." I read the minute of the Cabinet, the Penland Cabinet, the minute to which 'the `name of the Noble Lord is pills:Cdr.-I read it en tirely, and garbled no part—r Alined no sold in it—l read it because I. thoughrit necessary ; neither was it -a secret document, it was; : , printed by Ir. Perceval,. and was in' the possessint) of hundreds ; I garbled not • but I recorded tbever. "diet of acquittal which lied been given:. And rill ' the Noble Lord draw nay lietv4en the. publication of such documents as those'tb I have alluded, in thepublie newspapers, and the, reading, by a Member of this House in h s place,j .61 a declaration of innocence ? These . (l4kt , meets come forth to the etnintry through the (limn of two Papers . known to be welt lan:Ards the existing Administration : they •0% published in. The, arming :Herald and in Minwing Post upon the sameday, with comments in the latter, as if the Princess of Wiles vrhs brought' 'before the tribunal , of the Editor ; :, , the other is 'the property. of a person who has lately received honours - from the FrineC,Regeot, teal is knOwn to hOld frequent intercourse With Carfyiti House. But the Noble Lord now cietrges, inc with reading the Cabinet Minute---be made ,no 'complaint at the timel read it—(Lord Caitlereagh said tteross the table -" I 'did"): Did yon? I"heg - your pardon--I tb not recollect it=--it bad escaped .stit he that as it may, there is a Main tiff- % ference between this recital of a declaration Of innocence, and such pu blieatiOns as thoSC,'Which, after acquittal; load 'the itindeeut with igninniriy. I am not the adviser of t6' publictition..of 'the Princess 'of Wales's letter, Or 'of . any of the Sub-' sequent publieations, !nit ]`' know, if a person hai no other sesource.frorn orpression, it is no mis demeanour to resort to .this; I know that it ‘iqts :, the last resource of that oppressed person; who is -so till she is convicted of being guilty. Her Itoyal Highness has : declared that she' was not aware of this publication: All that I know it,. that this. illtistrioo person comes to Parliament; and calls upon it to pronounce lier guilty or tisat herias innocent. I know that there is no me4iage. sent to Parliament from authority; which ivuuld and ought to havebeets done if guilt could the „ Lord CASTLEXOAOII INOW know - the Hon. Gentleman's view of the matter, am the more coarrned in the propriety-of deeliniug.to, rply to his questions. I did charge him/Ci-do• not men the word iu au oftessive Sense), did complain at the time be rt!atl tfieminute, not that htiAillYled'. that ilo.tttue4; - bnt -'that 'the. reading of that4iOcnment itself,:nneyunci:ted 'with Others,- eau veyedTh: garbled stareme i ati 'n the ''eonstita -tionat Sense of the whOlc:cQtirse of ther-proceed inp.' complained his reailing the minute of the Dnke of .Portland's:•Cabiltet, without . also tinting into view' antecedent proceeding's, as cal= ciliated to make on the public mintl-'an impression 'not proper, it the docutnents were considei•ed al together. That. minute is only intelligible with a reference Co the. Minute or Lord' Grenville's Ca binet, ,card yet thp . Hou. Gen Oman; fo rjhe 'sake of his.own argument, brought forward only that. .which suited :himself, and afforded a partial vie.o of - the whole case. 'The . IJon. 'Gentleman unfairly :charges the. Government, or any other quarter, because these inattcrs have appeared in particnlar Papers. I say ' it was quite impor.ssible for the Hon. Gent. to read one part of t hi; documents ill his place, without calling out the others, which form the context of that part. I refer to the initiate' of the Portland Administration, and only be the House tO'bear ip mind ,that it confirmed the evi;- deuce .of the former Cabinet, in so far i t s- it did :not bring home the charge of legal criminality.. The lion. Gentleman cannot read one minu,te.with out my referring to the other. If he did not mean • that the whole should come out, he oqcht.not to have read • any part. Whatever has been done since. the publication of her ItOyal Highness's un fortunately advised letter, and the 'ulterior pro ceedings thereupon ; previons to this 'uneitir at tempt, by partial' disclosure to create prejudices, I' am intrepid in.stating'that nothing Was ever di,-; vulged . from any 'other quat'ter and whatever niay.be now the coimsequence, however injurious 'to the pnblic, are answerable for it Who ,brought gadded matter for the' purpose of makinga fa inipressiOn.: The lion Gentleman is not correct •thinkirg ti • soh, docu ment was prAiied bydVlr..rerceval----the Book con ,ovititnee - and strictures upon it, gird the thitenee of the aeete;ed. It contained act of State,: and the MA. t . : ientleman is the first., p 6n 'whos'e.'4e*tlie responsibility rests, of h av i ng , 10"a'r),y' act of the Goi , ernment in .this"affair." 4 . WitrrnattAo. On my head be it.. On. • my:head.be it tbati - madethe first }ittempt to rin ileate. the' Pri4CeSs Waft's:: ',On my head be the ha.veilitne--on the-head of othrrs.'ibe they have done atid on the he a d at the Noble Lord the responsi. • bility,for refusing to irritwer the questions ',have put to him. I tssstire ihe , Nloble Lord I' hill not take'offence at any of liisexpressions;•tor.l am snre. they are not,neant personally VV ; hower MitelOY we. wily feel' ,inters i , ..!1.1 in arguing cose4 • ,But I wilt ask• lain; after ihe'deelaration itiaileja the innocence . orllio X•Yales Mi.''Peicoral); alter 'What was sty tell the . Other-night by the tiltrite},;(neral, in his plitee . ; after tiOtling. the .Aninitte 'of acquittal,,,,..are , ..those' words to. be re ,tratited.,l;?•,' I bave.nti,ltifil,iition imphtingerimi .ntility ti . ; - "the Princess . .'of Wales:" - ef ,feer of what has sitiecpasseilis to 'iinpute eihm ,TheNObletOril wilii . .however; gi-Ve Ani.:4imittion.. triisihe . Will';; on. Wednesday, be . prepa . i..ed do .; and it.tlin Inotti tithe I pregame, from his • sileuce,''' that -no directions •-bave been hivets for,the r rosecirOon' of Laity Douglas." • • Lord CASTr•EIIEAGII never'made any declaration either.of guilt or.intuicetree i 'as I did not cortitldr' it to he within our competent juris dictiOn. I distinctly stated that the evidence sub'. initted'io the Portland 'Cabinet, which' went to crintinateJter,anyal Iliglicis„ , was either contra.' die i ted or net entitled to credence. •••• 1 did not . it. tempt to pronounce on gui4. or innocence, as this. House is not a competent. tribunal. I. did not' o:implant of the lion. Gentleman's-partial reading of garbled parts, as caletilultil to 'convey a Gime imyressieni on. the public Mind, Having repeated tbisl. will reserve further explanation till the sub , . ject Is regularlybefore the tfotige.'', 1111'. 111142ik4J--" I did not. desite'to make . a false impression, but an iinpression rf inno cence by what I thought a complete acquitfal• ~ Alto minute hi the Cabinet,, •Pare the Cabinet Ministers of this day' deny, my . .."statethertt ? tie Right Hon. Gentleman near the Noble Lord (Mr, Canning), who ocanikied a place iii the Cabinet when that minute waslinade, avowed that p it was an acnaittal.. I put it to 'you, .64r,. .(the Speaker) if the Noble. Lord did nat deity that, dritninality, .attached to the Princess' of Wales. • I put it to liedid not impute any ,erintinality.Stire'x arts,, if —.. guilty,'Sbe ‘,7011111 not only-have heen. restricted:in 'her intercourse with liar dough-. ter, • bat' prevented train that ;intercourse - alto gt.tt4r." - . Lord CAsTt.irmk.;tl—":The Lion. Gentleirom has said, i l e will take his'own - responsibility an himself) but it is hard to charge future.diselo sures, conseque9t upon his . Orst disclosure, on others., after IIC hiinself had laid the foundation I,vlfich lid to then)," ' . •I • • • • Mr. AViirrisne,u)—" 1.4ay,t0 tyvike tic iii pies. siou oaf lunoeenee•,wherit innot be unfair." ' • -," , . • • • • Lord 'CASTLZREACIII- 7 f . ‘ Tile Cabinet (lid not pronounce or innoteat, but of ihe legal imputc(l"-- , -- : . • • The SPEAKER here interfered. He reminded the House that a notice was gifen,..for the :future dis.eusSion of the !Subject, and'submitted to them 'Were could be any 'convenience, eert'ainly there could be no regularity, in. conkinning the pre sent conversation. tie called on LOrd P a l m ers t on e: 'Lora IYiu...rON rose at the sarile.tilne, anti the House divided in cries I'or hint and for Lord 1),11- merstone. ' - . • . Mr. WYNNE spoke to order, as to the right-of pritipity iii speaking-- 1 / 2 * • The Stfilmizu rej • oined—" WANT' to say 14, this that' 1. waited in pain to see a cour`e of great irregularity pursued ; irregularity AVhiph, on particular occasions-like the presenr, is some tames permitted.—l then larded to the Noble Lord (Pahnerstone), whose 'name stands Arst. in my. paper In the order af :business; My eYe wandered to no other quarter. It is for' the House to decide Who shall speak next."--4.(trniversai cry of Chair,. Chair!) Lord FAtmeaSToris moved the 'Order of. the D4y for ,the If nuie' resolving-, into . a Committed on the I'i ittloy Ul, . . ~( . I,t . 4 Loral - Airt..,Tols - , was -Proending to -oil"' ' ' I upon the conduct of Lord 'tt. 11.-oixs spoke to order. ', - , 1 ~ Mr: \Vat-x.BIIEBD conceived that 'nothing ,59 11 , be' tuore Parliatnentarylhan.that the Nobkbor(l, if lie iltOught,- that Ake- - (Alr. Whitbread) lad. 0 . 1 ) 3 ' , pointed - a day.-for,hringinrr. forward. hii rart,'), which was too distant, tFtat be (Lori i‘l''',",'. , should make a ruOtion upon the subject. f i; Veit lereagit, }Oleo therefore, thought that the procce'l in g ° Noble:Lord., in , resisting the reatling,of d ie only: of the I),.iy, : kVas perfeetly proper. Lord - Mu-Tote said, that -lie rose to prOpoie - acttendrnent. He thought that it ‘145 aEa sequence. who the commencer of the busi9css‘ every roan oust have- been disgasted: Wan,'' ,publications which had a ppeared. fie a( 16 0 suns inhig,h stations to beware of tangoing the public feeling.- As thelnaWr s too'l' ff ! convinced that the ptiblic , itioli o f tbe°‘ 4.' documents had not taken place 'withou to,— sent of persons •in power. Was the 61'. '' ..., (Castlereagh) really serious when lie c t , 6 ic 4 - the act of reading . a 11111111te WitwiththeP inD e ,. of :the whole train of evidence ? Illef e . .: not possibly exist' any core a rose :,^ pletely unjust. He had heard of liliette(l,l cations instilling -poison into the ulint, , s ‘ c b., people, but he charged the'publisheri ottTeky effluents with instilling into the minds flert,„ ple poison :of .the rankest kind; rit4 i t ' Ile sponsibility rested on their own bea tis s `h o phl moved, as an amendment, that the.o o. adjourn. . • ' t• ' Wg s • The amendment of the Noble Loriln't condecl, the original gaeltion was 01110.'411 lilt. . house resolved itself into a - _,.... ,e! ' ttO . - COM NI ITTE E 'ON TH. MX TIN Y .-- d s o - • Mr.: BENNET, iti ' a low tone, prufl,t • .clauses regarding the ahOlition of floggl 6 i oo o. Lord PALM ERSTON *objected to the,",, c ,„ i i flog: 1 - Sir E. BuitoarT said he understoOa '"' 2 s' ging was by no ineans so 'fregnen" l '' 'had been some years ago; he there the diminution would lead to - 10 He wished to know whetfier the; great it diminution of the ptinisior Fepresentql to him.: The Judge given. it as his opinion,, that it W. I t a h i o s a t u t t 1 4 6:f: i t i h l :e: t n n 4 t s u l l:e ° r l ,7 l O timei iash t e o s - c t r have.been sentence.tl; tie - wished t had any IntluenCe. that, in, the Army, there - should wards as well as of lnttiihments , out, ntit, only. the terror of ptmis 4 tiers, but also the eneotira emen t4e .iNlr ic . ic ....lt i li v .t ir 3l g iki ' F:lis 8,;-.rr-r nx s g aid, wander, in Chief had_broitght int which -had long ,existed, but %Oil used for a considerable, time, tile' WE*, t 4, c - :IV . cetses of such 31:i seemed. 554,... ,witlire corp w .,ll -. pia tried by_getterill regimenfal (instef, gimental) . Cottrts martial. 'Die the re-ea . of 'that statn'te tiara] Nnishateut had'grentlyal;at s il !il 1 , - 11 1) ; t i l er n! i l ct i le g i i tl i h g. g 'l t v s tiji z i t li y t'ec: htdllvii the e l: 11 j e enr i etH ; d : uja u ?: r l . n t e. l c r in : 1 1:-. : 7 : 1 1. l i 'i l ' L:Sl'il't. ii I' 1 ts9'Severe had been sobsii" : "' I ed that a number Of .Chose . c . .vit tat-P( 1 to the which House, l'ad - o ( t j t a i n .( l: l l . i a, y ie h rl ' li t ia ttbe' have It been greatly exaggerated. r° s ,c re w!i''. 4 ,'s' o r Baronet had stated-,Rout a scale 'i, c i t : i ici -I Cillght be supposed that there vitas li' .0 . , ,, , , ,., , .110: ' tiny reward b es tow'ecf - apon merit ia '', l o, of Ai n i ) rt 'Y e . O in ß 4 s t ol vt ei l i a et e - I s i- P a er nd s" s u A s il c o. 79le4l:sl'el v 4 :' s l lllref tA l: the streets and begging , he would 11$71iivosiV Collect that. theit-was:sticfi 'a thing ' 45 : b e e C r , a n i t T i t: d c t i t . i t i e l a l i a a i r t ors rn i' y l a, because a rr z t i v l s t r a n , .:p:u v l t i l l i ° o o . o v il g : l : l l : t e t i l i e t c ) : 3 r etl ii., ,i t ' l et f e e r s ' Q l? I : :would have the effect of exciting a-gi .e ..„ . r i to. '9f compassion- Allan the rags of, coan n " ro se '. cants- The eilieiency of itnprisonuWnt t.:-,v3,,., the„ fear of corporal punishment, Th',, 1 0 11 difference -between' friaking the P' 1 „ 1 ,; - : to 7 V flogging illegal, and taking taia, s `; i t ' ~ other ptinishments- to-lie SLIIII tit tit 0 )17 ' te 4 . e ' 'C O l ; Evii . dx LT aud M r . ilENNx'r said i P A . t i Oil s, . • Mi: Witt - ma:An was coiiviitelA . t :',, - ,,d:W; A s" . .i ,punishment might be entirely disPv n ,;, i ti o', 'lle hoped, that so long as it was c-- d : t al c ili woi ! Itl .he diseased in the Llouse i I ' l t otA" l discussiim bad led ,to. its diminution, i l e g t, ti 6 1 , 1, 0. would finally : he the means of its t0t 3 ' 1‘ir ,...‘, 1 ',4 After sOme.conVersation, in kyljc li o f 1 C ,i3 0 top, Lord kaiiiterston, and Mr. kleyherh:Nfr, r j , participated,: the 'clauses pror(Yo f t he (. net-were, negatived'; and the Report' ° •,y,' 0 - mittee:orclered:to, he received 10 -Ili fl i rr , ; ° ,l l 6 ol '. Tlye. s,ecpptl reading of the ,Iri'- --1 !-, i , t , twos postponed till Wetincsilly su'rolq , - . • .AdjOurntiff till to-morrow. . .. 7 i—.:- f --..... - 4...;—.....w....:.....A......•••••"''' '-- '' i Art.tivED—:.l D,11,1;„, mdcrforti, Consols PRICE OF , Tills oAY AT TWiILVIi t,611,00'"' .•••. Ut / 1 "" N . 1 1 2it1 4 DI tr.itg t LONDO „, TingnA.y MARC H for - • C3eneral IloPvig said to have brougil or 10' linlina-FtgS of a heW Treaty with Ssv e ' le'l ,- , the foil - 41' awing are the principal out""-. 10'1. iy That .Colonial prOduce und rii.,b ;1011,1i het"r6 sbait. aiimitted into Sv/e4e" cis 114 same'dutiei and aTrangeinents AS I Cif t fl tt i ot d , GUSTAryt DOLP HUS.' 2.' TioL -' c A Britain shall be re3pectad Its th l af t f - ii °l4 .4 Youleti nations. .3. -That er AstibildY°)o thousitad pa w ußds 'per att sh bc .1.4 Tir den, as tht con4ition of lier.zal are P1'11,;1110 t'r.'- 0 1 1 $ to 4ct im the fto uthern sh" attimt the cuinteoll 11 4, f 13tL, nt dill rer Fore 4 t OVA 1 'e °11 : ; cd: t 19(1 'ri men , bo o ottif %Is illeg 3 "iitel mv iete %chick to ki icor lie prof bet"', o ho in , '1 • ;boleti( tooit nt of 're° • 1 tha t t h - ,, Stiltl J•' lett tw is obic c°l , ,i t ed g r.. to . llilllii'tl ,!G rettfc c()o°i4 ast " r 1;41 11"- " 14 31,0 L 1,.. 0g S C a lo itervu l th E [lc 111 0 o v; 0 f jtg; I't' ,oce sf q,dt , tt