The Sun. — London, England, 1807-12-01 00:00:00

LAW REP )117'. ,C .)Ull.l' OF CHANCEkV, Nov. 28. . , 'oPERA .Alre FONIILANQUA, in bringing this case again be - • fore ; tl)4 Lour) c#A,zitcgia.on, referred.to °leers t •- `l4de . by ; kri tlient,4lr, Waters, to Mr; Taylor, in ,conse tjuenFe of what, had fallen from he r.,ordship oo a torkter, cloy, to refer every point in dispute a to rbitra tipm The points Mr, Waters ripecially, alluded to wi4Fe,, 'IA, hether s he, Mr. Tnylor, had given . such permial attendance, anti `had so fully de votCairikOtchtioo to the affairs of the concern as by tlr,detii,of 1803 lie,-wa‘ r6qPired ? d, If by that deed 4,413 d a right to deWgate his authority a; ma nager,t4imother 3d, If Mr. D'EgVille was a pro- . pgr,ipersorr to whom,to delegate that'eharge ? 4th, IfeAse •Luid a right to : crigge performers not only viltiropt liis (Mr, NY's) concurrence, but even con tcrtryiat4iis inclination ? It, in the sallltS , ,be was entitled to cl,iwtiss Mr. .Jewell from Doing treasurer, and Mr Kelly 'from being Assistant manager; and whether they ought not to be, restor er! ?• . Generally, to refer the whole plait of the en suing! season ; : and finally 1101641 g to him tha,t, he baci the permission of the Marquis', of, Headfoct, to ripe that Nobleman as : the arbitrator on.hiS W's) part. To this offer Mr. ',Faylor had : sent . an answer, which, the learned CounsH the Plain tiff was at a loss to.comprelicnd ; out he trusted, his , LardsMk w,ouldtte ! far pt s i s sttri the general walk, Of his jildiciaf eharaCter, as to direct the prii,, for, their own benefir,. to emu, _into an arbitration.en' such terms as •. should be likely to bring their differ edesstnin issue Mr. Itlcnsans, fur Mr. Taylor, said, the offer of Mr:-Waterti seemed' so utterly inadmissible, that the Delenclant s could not possibly listen to it. His Lord; . - try do with the tei'ms of reference. The question brought befOre his Lordship by, the" her party was, whether Mr. Ta' -. ) 'lor should be re rniryed Irina the managernent, (1 attiith r Person pot ill ,his stead ? The statement of this question, on the one side and the other, was already before . his I,ordship, and 'he was now 'called upon' to decide betiYeen the two partiei. • The Loan CHANCELLOR said, he lord thorighti gteat deal on the ' subjed since it was last • before him, and he was the more convinced it was a (106- tioti, which he must deteimine on the dry , rights : of parties: 'These rights were not left open to tie chn.i enured, but 'were defined by a deed, by which the eidixe,'and ex.clusitte tnanagement of'the Opera douse Were vested in !'lr. Taylor. On the death of GoOfd: Had the party displeas&l with' the Migetnept, the dunes of which, it was :igreed, it` ins disputes concerting; them shottld arise, to be referreil to 'arbitration, come to the Court after the decision Of the artritrator, and represented that s'tich a 'breach of duty had been proved as, amounted to a. forfeitUre of hi s Covenanted right of management,- the Court would have felt itself bound to interfere.. Here his Lordship was eallecton to do by interlOcut ory judg inent, all he cuuld'do by a decree. This his Lord ihrp eottld not' do. The mortgage could be no tea ifOti for - cliAurbing the pre-existing rights, ThereAvaS illi:eady a caw! et to t h e concern a receiver was therefore tinuccessary. On these grounds he saw tits reason lit preSCLIL for interfering, w h a t eve r Might be; 41s. opinion on a final discussion of theeatise. He s tinift convinced betbre the parti es were dayi OhleOiey l wpiald thank hint for his P - 0 •• t 1 Cll CUSIOII. COURT OF . KlNG's' BEN CIL; Nuv.,.'2.8. MANNING AND CO. v. Tim WEST INDIA DOCK. COM-.: PANY. , The Court gave judgment in this 'cause, which Was; that the rule of estimating the damages sustain ed by the Plaintiff shOuld be according to the value !, of the profits of the Plaintiff's warehouses on an averhge of :three' years immediately preceding the -passing of the Mt, and not, as the Plaintiffs contend cd, on the three years iminediately preceding the . openitigiil the Docks. The opinion of the Record er, hi point of law, was' accordingly sustained, and the rule for a new trial was discharged. • Tau KING V. wzwAits. The Defendant was brought up to receive the judgment of the Court, , having been,cOnvikted of assaulliug a Mr. Abbey, on the DOneaster, ; Race Course, in. consequence of the following circum stances : The Defendant, Mr. 'Williams, had betted the Prosecutor fotir to six on the horse'Yesta, which lost. The next day Mr. Abbey saw Mr, and. offered him four guineas, which he had. lost. Mr. Williams insisted on twenty guineas, saying he had'neVer betted such a sttni in his life. ;The Pro- seentor said he fur he had heard him bet that sum the day before with a Mr. lirow tie. . Oif the lie direet being given, .\lr. Williams knocked Mr. Ab-. bey dewn, and 'for the assault tic was convidedat• the last York Assizes. Counsel being heard, Mr.. Juitice GROSE pronounced the sentence 'of the court, 'which was, that the Defendant shotild pay a floe of v)1. I'IiEINC V. DODD. It will .be remembered that ..criminal information Was filed by the Attorney-General against Air. Dodd, the Engraver, fbr publishing a prospedifi era Public Dis'tillery • Comp:toy, &)iitrafy to the 'Statut e o f George I. 11 0 fitx.,tion to he decided in die case io, 'whether - the many Public Companies . Way tsta blished are legal ?, and the Attoftioy,General' was about to proceed day in arguments ;in behalf t$ thb proi;ecovicifi; v,itc'in GAlirlyW, on the :other side, signified that he Was nor int:pared With suffi cient intbrimitiOn in gupport .of ' , the DefendaitiL— Th.e. Court thi.tretere ofLiercerAlidasti: stand"net until tie'xt Te:m. I . . . wILLIziN if4nrg. Mr. JEKY I f‘!"! i :.SIIICe,,IIIVVett f4s Mat4.ld- IIIO S to be di tVatt' , :i tit y.. Lord 111AyOr Litu.l. Aldcr men of the City of Lohtluii, coitiiimoiliiig thvin to discharge this. pprs'on,.! who is au .insolvent debtor, under, die.46t...4,4.i , .. • '‘ , Vgliatn Diet& said 'he W 33 for .tour years,a.'pri, loner,-for 'detß 4 do to Thomas Ark, of Cold 13ath fielda, to the atinOnnt of 7021. fig hartcauseil the groper Advertiiernents to,"be made, and conformed i every particular to tins Statute; uuid fin Eller, that • l,O-NDON by. fti 41 ,* i.clarlig. afOr.tt,,cour to 1 .5 ( 'W..1 1 .1 att.! puhlislit:d by► . `J.lt.Lt 5,4 R 1.411.4 Sc al pea, of South M, - "l ti ! tr . 4 . Aft the ! lititothi licg NU: 1 i,2,'Strand ; Vittrti 4 dves iisernena .0f440 - tar the' 'Editor; &s, (W- r 1 44: illakt be addressed.. when he appeared ~neither the tlaititifr, Thomas Ark, nor nny:igher person, opposed his clischargp, l yet hejtaf,ternanded. The, court inquit;ed for what rause he, w.rs irn prisou,ed, and upon being told that he Watii I execu tion for damages , for an aCtion of 0 1.„u1,:jr, the %%tit .was relused.7—Tertn ended. • SERtEANTs'INN ItAtt. Nov. jp. ' HI, KING This day the objeEftaiS taken by' the Defendant's' !Counsel to' his convittiOn for embezzling.his effeEts; the ' being & l ily declared tt4lenkrupt, were argued by IM 'llOr.eorii, Wore L'oftEctexilottc:tlon (Chief I ,litstice), the Chief the CI rts of Cotii 7 ithin Pleas and •EiChe4iierl.atitt the rest of the .Inci;es, Sir Git.tS BoOi 'E'd4c4fed. holicht abs ( ilf throegh indisposition, The Learned; Counsel Said, his objections Were feturiennmber, and contended geliAlifty; that - ,the infliCtMent - must be . sieashed, sontOf the material atlegatThit'r not tiirefeg Made Out: itfevid6 i nce. MrSt,' - it was alledged, "'that a Cottii mi§sion nnder the Great Seal of the United Empi(e,. etas" tlttly awarded ligaitist''James Bullock." The: piendigtitin 'of the insfrUinetft hoWever,.pro‘ ed !it to have' been issuecl tinderAte' . .Qrearqeal of Great . The . allegfitiott,',he•lSitl, being a material one; the variation 'wa'S 'falai. *Neither . cbuieithe ComrnisSion itself be' supported, 'as the Great Seal ‘e:e; impreperl degeribekif IS•Ling, - since the ifn ion ‘('t h fieland, the; Great'Silit'ofttle , Vnited tnpire, no %Os - a parrt bf that . Etitpire second obje6tion was, (v that it proved at the trial t hat the Petitiohing‘Creditor'4 dAit arose after' an r:.e(::t o f . Lianitruptcy had •beenconi"- Mitted;' and _Lords "l'albet and Hardwiche, and Other itidges', had laid it doWit law, thet no per den was authorised to sue' out a Cominission of unless' he could be relieved. iinder' it it ‘vaS therefore that the debt must arise prior to the Commission, and that not being the case With the ' Commission - nutter enquiry, the Defendant could not 'be said to have - bee , ddeclared a , Bankrupt iii 'One form. third•etijedien was, 4 ‘lb:it the Pifelehint had been' deaintd . tt Bankrupt "by , the •C(3linnisioner4 upon this'evidenee of an ioconipetent Withe , 3," indiametit . itliedged, that the ladant was in due firm end manner, and:upon good'proef, detlared a Bankrtipt ; nuw upon the trial it appeared, that the 'Witness who gave evi dence, befoie 'the Conunislsioners of the' att of, brink' ruptcy on 'Which the.Counnission isStied, was a Cre ditor of ihe Defendant's', consequenitly intereAed in the matter he? was •deposing to,' 0110 hrthe. law of the land- wits an incoftVetent Witness.' :'By' the 5111 a 'Geo. 11. C 30. the eVidence of an interested iWit ness could not be receitied its a' Court of Justice; it was the same, hevauld-contend, before the Com missioners cif Bankrepts;and' the evidence a 'hided to having -been' 'reeeived, attd a. CoMmisSien issued thereon, the Defendant had :not been declared upon good- prOlf. His fourth and last objeetien was, " that the'Cottituission was not duly stamped,"'in*inuchr . as it had only an e4liteen-pehny stamp, .tviietiqn point of' legal propriety it should have been a hiailip:" • 'He knew it might be said that the Connuissi,citirecipired no stamrat).lll,.that aright, be. true, but iitrtheplirties , whh had concluded the Presecution, t hough t 'preper tb atiji stamp, they . ‘c ere bound to attikisbeh - stamp Alk-Lekis lature had pointed butes , ' proper for Instruments in the i nature of Letters 'Patdnt passing the Great Seal. I.:he.Courisel concluded, by apologizing for the titn6 be had consumed, and hoped' the great anxiety the Unfertuitate liven his represented felt to hav'e' hiS•case fullethtted.lo 11)4 Lordships, would tarnish his excuse., bIIRNiY, on thepart or.the:Croven,;addiess ed' their' Lordships n support of the indittment, and contended generally that:the Learns& Counsel`, Mr. tioLeovn, had apt sustained his. objet. ions. Wish to thetrht, - "' that the Great Seal was in ,rudierly diseribed,"llie Sthinte th of QUeeti Ann, wind) had been mainly -relied upon, did not warrant the assertiom — Mr..HoutoYD, he said, had insisted that since the Union with Ireland, the Great -Seal., was no longer the:Great Seal . of Great, Britain, 'but-of the United 'Empire : yet in tee subseqtient stattites, the. Great Seal had been described as. the - Great, Seal of Great Britain ; nay, the last Commi ssion-signed, authorising certain iNoble Personages to exercise the office, of Lord High Admiral, was de scribed as'being issued under the Gieat Seal of Great Britain. In point of lad, it would, have, beenje,t4.. dent to have .alledged, that a, commission, under the Great A S'eal„ was del) , awarded against the De fendant, and anyi thing further was, unnecessary.. At all events , , the variance could not vitiate. the indict ment. As to its being proved on the trial, that th e Petitioning Creditor's debt arose subseqeent to an ael'of bankruptcy committed, which was the second ebjedion, if that was to prevail ; theliaekrupt Laws . would beCome a dead letter, as no Commission could in thture be sustained. It •is true, that prt?of of a prior docket having been struck was given in evi dence, but it was not, followed up by the proof of any existing Petitioning Creditor's Debt; and in point oflfaip the transaatoti was most glaringly frau dulent.. That objeCtiqd, therefore, must fall to the ground. "With respect to the third objeCtion, name the inadmissibility of the witness who prayed the ad of bankruptcy. before the Commissioners, • should reply, " that it was only averred, _that thee' Commission issued upon good proof, and it was net material, to them upon what grounds the Cgrnmis sioners had'- , .formed their judgment, provided they ; were duly authorised 'hut the prosecution did not rest upon-the act of-the commissioners, as they had 'Most satisfaCtorily proved the net of bankruptcy on ithe trial; and.the result was, that though they , 'alledgedAhe 'Cemmissieners to have duly found. .the Defendant a Bankrupt; they, upbulhe bad '.dots proved him to have .been, respect tothe fourth and kist.objthion, that the Cemmission , was'not duly stamped, lie should re)iy sr one sen 7 .. tenets, Unit it require d ,lii , ,e ; stiltup at all', and without lookingtack for a century„.llP would refer their . Lordsbips , :to the 44th of the *resent:King, , 0, 04, whiehe, rein ala all s mops:- 'Whattore imion eovutuis-' siousTol,l3ankrupts: liorthese.reasons lie wottl.dAbt. snit,that:the objeffians.,were nOt'sustained, and tlialf the tdificpent; N!qseever good in %Lama. 'the decision and...opinion of the Judges will tie :made ktowliettiefirsti,daY OF' - the,Olil sei ,Siolls (t9.liiol.llAiefiailVticaurt. was crowded in, , ,the 'extretue..' 'COU4T '()F. Cy i i4 . 4 "olZ. • EY v. I?l,,svoNTitilig. This was :in aeliott.for 00 gUiThias," as the ()rice of - . a horse, alledgedto have,, been sold under , the fol- Pnwing vircumstatE:e :---The Plaintiff left the horse at fitlit..3 Livery Stables : the Defendant called on Hull, on Stinday.i he I eth of April, and asked leave •to try. the horse for an hour, which was permitted. thetntisked' HUH, if he Might take hirn 'io Ma ijor 'Mackenzie, -of Tower-hill, who waited such fa horse. _•,fittil,'perinitted him to do so, with . this i „, 'positive njunction---“ must either bring me the horse,.or 1001. by two. o'clock at farthest," The horse was ; taken upon ;these terms, and not returned. till eight, !,Hull hen.:refesed to,take hint,, and con 7. sidered the horse as sold.. The case at•the trial was home out entirely by the positive testimony vf,Hell and the Jury believing that evidence,found a Nerdit*. fur the Plaintiff. Mr. Serjeatit SEMPAIERD. had obtained a eon : - chtioual Itide to ,set .aside • this verdict Oa two !goods That.- the !evidence of 11 oil was most. improbable in itself, and (L; i. oet_s-uppert the declaration as to the sale and , 2dlv, that if there was a sale, such sale would be void. by Ole statute of Charles 11. • Mr. Serjeant. Best SlleWeacsuse against this As to the credit of [lull, that was a question for the Jury, and if they believed bisfPvitict)(;e, 1 here was no. doubt. thatthere was a sale, The second objetion he conceived to more. inipprtantl: but agitinst that jeelion Ice ,must 'c )attend, that n:it her the common last'; rgnitit)l stOtute,' so Mille all sales made on a Suntlay.,, - This At of Charles li, cmikagtl,.‘‘ That. ttadesmen, nrtifieers !Jabonrers, or other pe:..sons, shotdd not , exercise their ordinary .avocat iotis,on the. Lord's Day ; hnd,that tie , person should cry, chew forth, O'r.. expose to. sale, ;Tapy *args , or, wrchandize on Sunday, under the; penalty. of .tor, leitipg. the , The 'statute La conVeiyett ‘O apply merely to the publia exercise of trades, Hot to private sales. There was.a cake in t'st Strange, 702, where a per i son,had been indided fer. meat Suliilay, , atidit was rifled tiOi to be an of fence indidable at common law. The,ecelesiasti= . cal ,law„, indeed, required that 'eVerypersou should Iftend divihe . service on a Sunday, and 'it WaS Otinsextuently exPeaed tint they were to iiehavti With deeency and deCoeum at church, and it would evidently be a great breach of decency to make con- tra ,7 ts about buyJng horSes when in church, and when one's mind,ought to be dire6ted to other tub- Jewish JAW indeed ntade void all con traEts 'entered into on the cpHy' pl . their Sabbath, but the Jews obscene& their Sabbath with u rigour that had not been adopted in this col tntry. 'Whether or not the Plaintiff had been guilty of any Offence o;;;iinst the 'ecclesi;lstical law, in selEng the horse on it Sunday, still that would not 'annol tlic contract.' Sir JAMES AIANSFI.ELI).—" Certainly, according to tho ecclesiastical VieW of it, 'a Man's mind could not he supposed to be: abstra(stf.d from worldly at fairs, and 'propel ly . engaged 'in ion ? ' when i lie W:l4 thMking about .sullin;; horse for tod guineas. The old cases in Ciook, Eliz. declaring that, anionsmight be illegal, and yet nut void, would not be Considered as law at present, a 3 every day's experience proved, in the case. `W . ' sales of struggled goods." • Mr, Serjeant Baser said, he meant to contend that every thing was 'lawful which was Mit prohibited expressly by some law. The Act of Charles 11. could not he meant generally to embrace all pro ; Ihr. the Lord Chancellor may n.)kv excr ijsethe important duty of putting the ;x:it Sal to „it Patent on a Senday, and he did bet conceive that the confirming a new. title conlil be' said to bean ai:t Of moot) greater necessity than selling a horse:. There was an Act passed in the reign of James I, to • preVent shoemakers from exposing 'their goods to sale on a Sunday, and imposing - severe penalties bn them for so doing. ~ ,This Aet,.Lowever, as the Act to prevent drovers front driving their cattle: on that day, slimed that' it was not an offente at common law, or otherwise there would have 'beeti no occasion: for the Statute. Formerly fairs of cat tle used to be held on a Sunday. lhe Learned SO jeant then argued at considerable length, that what thosu:Statntes meant to prevent, Was the indecorum of the public exercise of trades on a Sundajr, and the 'disturbance that it might occasion to those who wisneil (Nisi theied;ly for those purposes to Which it is peculiarly set apart ; but that it private 'sale did not Coin within then . inc!lning, and that the goods so sold could not be' said to tie expo,en to s a l e , as Mentioned in the Stattite., Mr. Serjeant SgEPHERD said, that. that part of the Jewiati Law which was contained in the Ten Commandments was completely adopted in the Christian Oode, and that Ow Fourth Commandment vv.ot4lti always be considered obli gatory in every .;;liripiatt country. His Learn ; ed Friend Jilid appeared to . censider; that, until the pas Sing of those statutes, no: other offence existed. The words of the granite , were, how ever, different, for it begah . by stating : " Where;is abominable Offences are committed against Almighty ',.God aud.the Saints;, by;the profanation of the Lord's Day, 'therefore be it enacied,"'ac. Althaugh' the Act enatted -additional penalties and • prohibitions,- yet the. praaices which it meant to suppress were illegal;before that time. If the law was against ex 'posmg to sale, and all the other. things which were to bring about a sale,' they must be against the sale itself., The Learned Serjeant therreentended, that Hull, the horse-dealer, was, in the strictest sense of the word, a tradesman eetereising"his trade upon the - Lord's Day, and that the 'lerviingthe horse out for trial, and then .selling hitn, i Wal, to, all intents and purposes, exposing it fbr sale, and direaly within the meaning ol the Words cif the statuteolCharles IL {-I)ultltitillele7ethledl'epnocein,C)foHf utlilledieditit.°Jiperoavlse9a°s°aillete.U.,edj: 'Mr. .Serjeant Butt tollinne&on the'Sarne'side. JAME'S MA Nrsi , ri,ln said, that as 'to the Sale.!of the horse, it Hull's .test imony was to bebelieneil (and the Jury had believed' it), there, &did be no doubt flue sal t lei i tb 'e was a oiigvcii s ci a , le a ; I b tbt ei lle li r d p e oi o n t t ti i , a sl b .in t! day ! 'that was a ne:4 poilit, • acrd the Court .would Consider of it. Tlic City Seisioos yesteradY - .before ()rdy thre,e trials took plac - :e, of them tilfictcialy, ititere . 2ang for detail. Two vrere far assaults ;‘ and the third. xs - -ac an ind lB ! meat against the -noted /Wald and his wife, for keeping a . disorderly lionge.at No. 3, Copt all Throgrnarton-street: . The prosecution waitarriid on at the instance of the Parish OffiCers, nti:l the Pt isone.ri were both conviaed, and, sentenccd to one inonill's imprisinnuent in ~Giltspur-greci Compre6 and-the husband to py at fine of 501. . . The ditferenceln the specific Weight , of salt , ..and fresh Water has br.ext strongly exemplified in case of vessels whose draft has hecti fautid progres sively, to. itivreass 'as they-come Up. the. Parti cular attention was lately paid. to the susajeo; we PP-. lieve by 'order of the Trinity douse, in ' respea to We:st 'lndiainan,. which,' on accurate adrneasnrr - . went, was found to draw a foot more water in the. West India Docks than she did in,the'Dow4. • . . . , B.lRnis. • • ,•. , . On• Saturday, the Lady of William Sims., Esq. of mite'- , gio, of a Daughter. • . ; , 4 •• Tkit ; same da Mrs. R. Scrafton Sharpe, of Fenchurch..: S - frcet, ()Fa Son. _ • •r On tile i6th ult. the 'Lady of Captain and Adjutant Eld derdale,ot the ;First . Rerks Cavalry, °fa Son. , •DiStinclayldst, at his house at Charlton, Kent, the LEI)? of lobo Atkins, ,Esq. nt a Daughter. _ 4 . - . - '-. .I‘.. On sAculaJy ti 4: 14th ult. at the Castle of Chester , 7= lady of Lieutenant;•Colonel 'Young, of the 80, or. 1 0 6 0" Regiment of t;opit, of 4 Son, . • • 4 ,.. On Saturday sennight, the . Lady of Lord ViscOunt Here, 'ford, of a,Son and Heir. hI,IR a /AD. On Thursday last; William Bowillr, Esq. of Cheapsido to Miss Siiiip:pn, eldest daughter of the Lite John Simps(wb: Esq. of,i - ontefrael, Yorkshire. (4 " Sltild , 9u. at. • Blacimlufe," Essex, Charles F, of the 13th Light Dragoons,_io L•wisa, daughter of I.lte lute Citadels Alexistder Crickitt,- ES.4. of.Sinyth's • • C• - 1 - 1 same day, Aswarby-l!ousc. Lincolnshire); ,„), Attv, of the Royal North Lancola.Militia, ,to Miss How' . ‘‘'llreliCUte... 7 • .. e . DIED. . ~ On oaturtlay Morning lot,. at his house. in Grosvenor.. place. Sir folut.Thiantas Stanley, Bart. of Aldersley I'r k ', tiheshire. '' • ' . - The same eveni:ig.„ at his house in Punderson'S-pitc:.:! Bet!mai-green, Thomas 'Browne, Esq. Secretary to illg L' r leant Company. . - h t z e l 1 ( 1:;:r t el . : 1 i t i c l a:u t t g ' er h i . t n cr t h o e r , 1 % 44 / t ilt i y a e n a t rf Tustin, il e E age,sq . of i t , l s ti i iel• street, ru()sitii 1 Si l u V —Lately, at 'l3 . llodand-flotiie, near Barnstaple, Mrs. VV,b . : - bet t Wife of Philip Rogers Webber, Esq. daughter of 1 ` ) /': Incledon Esq. and granddaughter of the late Sir a cal Northcote, Bart. ; # . , • 1 1 1 1 . 1-1 Al' F. R AT_ LC) f‘i 131211)G T 0441011.- - ROW. • t 4 ;an. after 3. Afternoimi after 41; 1.0 N DON MAIM E,Tst 0. • t' IN MARK-LANE; . ' .. , ,Leos, Meal Wei'gheis; Noll, to h of Nov. to the 213 t of NOTh e to the Ad, , 635 Quartets at 65 01 ', ' 161 -----;• ..it. 6 4 , C 4 45 ---- at 6.0 61 ' 13 --,---- at 631. ‘4l' , 0 s$ — 7 -,-- at Ozs od f • • 6 at 6 is, 9( 1 1 479 —;----- at fci od :I --•—•-.. A . 99 —O,-t 50' 0 1 i , ZS4 -.- --- -•-• a t ) 7i —A ierAge 665: ;id. , • lan last Return. . . Iticri/RN OF WIC A' It y Me3sl-1, tt Nand N 1 Including only from the *Of agrot;:ll)i) '42 , Quarters at 73, A jrz at 4,i , ) , i 171 ----• at 7ts cid 66a at 7as (34 4a 6 ^ --- 1 69 —a. ,s ort tbi at 68 611 -Po --7- 4 at bBs oil szit at 67s ad 448 --- :It t) 4(1 • 1:15t3: 5i.436 7(t. ut,giter th A RETWA.N 0t: FLOUR, i From NOV. 14, to Nov. 2,), 111)111 alt. COt:kot.()Mc;e: Sacks. s. tt. Sack.). s. .d. Sacks. : 1 4 -34 ,- f.. — ,63 o• • 75 —54 ig '...--".. - 60 oI ' -- 587 —36 ~ o st 6 --' 5, 5 ~—,- 52193 --- L,‘ t o ) , 9333 •-- Sts o 1 - 14794 —•55 o i Pot --;.-7,.144 i. ; ,: ic6 f ) .....—.... $ 57 7 6 1 1 _,1 7 3 3 4 4 4 --- s i! 0 . 1 0 2 1 ....---.: , j , .. And to Sacxs at 475. per Sack. . S . ~ Total-29,481 sacks. ----Average sss. Bcl. per Sac!•• , 1 to. 3d. per Sack 'higher than Last week. W EsTE it N COUNTR VMARK ars (last Wa 4 t) Pe r Wheat. ~ Ba t l e y. - . 04ts. 04 Newbury szs to Sca •3 t• od- to .ps od 1 2 28s od 0 34 ry Sitikbu 5S,i to 66s jS.odto VS ad iIS 0 fOli, Ilasingstoke 1 ..os to 7r:i'. 1 s .6d. to 4,is o d 1. :4 8; o il to 44 Went:nester 1 6zs to 64 - f3Rs ed tip 4a, al I 3.' 0 1 i'l &I l i Devizes, to 3 , Sts to 7,-.,, 1 34; oit to 4os od , 29, •1 • ia Warminster I uos to 7,,, 35, iid to Ors o d Ips od 1°• PK I ( )1 HOPS. RAGS. Kent, 41. tis. to sl. SIISSeI, 41. 10S. 10 SI. 6., Essex; 41. los. to ci, 6.. r ocK art.. • Kant, 51. as. 40 61, Os. S"","•• it. os. to 51.. 10 5 • 4 . * ; F.troh..ni), - til.las ‘Qt.-°',..; NtitVGATE AND LE.‘DLNII.NLI. lid tier Carcase. Beef A 2s. -fid. to 41i. oa. Veal 3s, ed. t 0 )7 . I. Mutton 2i, Sit. to 4S, 41. I Pork 4s. c d..to s'' • PKIC It 0 r. A Tit Elt '( per lb.) AT , IXAI)I ,, Ni• •A Botts, go to ;61b. each r zit!. t . 4) ;0, Ditto, bo to b 01). each . . - aid. ;At. Mercliailts' !Licks, . . Dressiog . • . tbld. t 0 "1 Flue Coaclt Hides, . t 4) Crop Hides, 3; to 4olb..tiir cutting i; 2 0, 45 to scib. - r 2,(1 * to 4.311"4,ki115, 10 to 4014. 26;1. 'to 324. per 16. Ditto, •so to troll); 364. to tfoit. per Ili. • Ditto, j 70 to Boll). 3V. to 3sd. per 10. Snail 4cals (Greenland) 3 , J. to AO,l. pi!, lb. Large ditto, rooi. to tios. p..ir Dozen. Tanned Horse Hides, Os. to . 23a. each. • RAW HIDES. 140 Heifersand Steers (p. Sr.) Ordinary, is. rod. to Sd.- to 3s. • od. •Mark.:t Cid f t 'is. 0d;1240.,' Middling, - is.' 4d. to ts. 6d.. Eng. Horse r4s.to ‘e• Sheep Skits - 2s OCI to PR ICE OF , 3 li...A. r t ot t y ' n O T lV al . lo . vv6o.6d.7l4,o l4 St. laros t s Market 4s. it of , Clare Market 4s- ' • 3't• . Yellow 1i.u55i4475.0-', ~,I, Whitechapel Market 4s. att. t White-do. —5. (AI. b;*' . - Or stone OfBlb. --",-.- t ' Soap do. ;-5.62 ~ ed . !' o s, . • 3 is. 8.1 . , ( Melting „Stull —a. 51. Average price 45. zt,il. ; Ditto rough --$. 36) % . 9 waves las. od, ... . .. . , • I Good Dregs 125. od. Yeliow Soap, Bos. —Mottled, gos.---curd, 94 9 . ~,a, Price of Candle:i per dozen,, I is. act . •--Mouldy. I" ; - - • • _-__:.--•- .. Sr. lANIES'i, 114 Y, roARKET, sav, Is. Ha, to 61. los.vts. od. P _, •Ara y w, tl. l t 63. oci. to 11. r, s, 6d.-11yer.11. 18 ' . ' wiriTECHAPPL , HAY MAR 1,11.1 .. flay, 41. tos. od. to 61 . tos. 5 1. tos. ot 1. Myer, 51. tos. od.' to 71. os. 0(1. -...Aver. 61. 04 Straw. 11. to. oil. to 24. 041.-4 Ver• ' l * BS. ad. New Hay 01. os: per Load. COAL -MARKET. S -T ili — ps a: Market. Nov. :3. 8 Newcastle 3jsid'at 4 1€ od -co t t Cinders .1 at 26s od fed Novcastie Sa y 2s . 4 2 at s if 27. 23 Novelistic 4IS od 541. 2 Cinders g 1 6 $ °Li,