The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1820-02-16 00:00:00

... . I At the present moment, when every thingsno. ciatetl with the memory or our late lamented B*. 'neeign is full of interest, however intriusichlly unignitieent in itself, works of real merit ishish here Shot recommendation must •he considered s of inestimoblu votive. Of this description .le the splendid portrait of his late M iron% its' shitted gloss, th st adorns the room of '3lr.'"Ctiiuss, s the St. »nil. near Temple-bar. lije l n full-length portrait , f his Majesty, seated in hie coronation olio. The splendour of the coloariog. the grace jut fall ..1 the drapery, the eorreetnees of the pro ',rutin. s, Aid the boldness of the design, all coin. hilt, in sl,..ks , it a moot beautiful and finished pine. llt is [to s. the original painting, by BARRY, and execuie'! Ity Mr. PEARSON. 'IIII.VAILS ARRIVALS sad DEPARITIRSS. 11° , ' : •• • •• , ......—.10.-- c ..• AItIIIVALS. The Wirquis sad Marchioness of Anglesey and family, yesterday minor, at their hem is Old flutliogiun.stroet, (ma *vs. .tot ' proudest'', Staffordshire. The librl ,d . Chatham, as Irsueday, at Cosh's Hotel, Al. benmeleasmei. faun his seat iu Cambridgeshire; her Lady. 'hip at 11.. r Masher's, Lord Spheres seat, Frogooll, Lim. The Earl of Cardigan, at his frame in Portinan•sgeare, from his eat, Dram Psirk,Asear Awaked, Northampton. Lord Althorp, at kis he... is ffall.mall, from Spencer House. Northampton. Sir G. W. Osmoiag, Bart. and fonsily, at !heir buses in Sinrille.rue, from their seat, Mortis Hams, gear NM* moon. .;pct At Thomas's Hotel, Berkeley.square:•—•ffec.'ihr ilejelal from a tear ; W. A. Harris, lip. from his meld MilMlSMsall; an d Harlots, Esq. from' a tsar. At Kirkham 's Hotel, timer Bsoohotreet :—Sr Wyncl. hsiti Dailing, Bart. and family, from their seat in Norfolk; and the Hots Mr. Russell, from ..tour. „ At Ole Bilk Hotel, Piccadilly t—Litril Northesk, from Ibis sent in Hants; Hareems Le Despeiseer, from her seat in Bunks; anti Colonel Bullkeley sad falsity. from Bath. T. T. Eters ~,,, Esq. M.P. at his boom in St. James's. sou are, front his seat, Tattoo Park, Cheshire. - 1 DLPAITURBS. bird St. Helen's, Cr.in his boom is Graionatirtet, Emig street, for 1.0,11 Bulkeley's seat, Eogirlieldireen, Berks. Lord Gruver, free Urdwidge-Misr, for Windsor. T. Papillon, E.q. Sad non, from Kirkbanea Hotel, Lower Brook-sti eel, for Frolkotone. (CIRCULAR.) (Corr.) Whiteball, February 14, MM. SIR-1 ion directed by Lord Sidmouth to acquaint you, that his Lordskip, Wring received several applications ou the subject of the oaths which °tight to be taken by Jus tices attic Penn., in consequence of his Majesty's Accession, has consulted with the Attoroey sad Solicitor.Geoeral there. 011 ; and thinks it right to acquaint you, for the isfurmation of the Justices of the Peace for the of that thoueh not strictly necessary, it will be right that the !static(' should, at their first Sessions, take the oaths of Allegiance, Snpreisiacy, and Abjuration; but that they need not take any other oath, until a new Commission of the Peace 'hall be issued by his present Majesty; when every Justice, intending in act under such Commission, must take the oath of office, before the Clerk of the Peace or bis De puty; and taut also, within the time required by law, receive the 'arra men t, and take the oaths of Allegiance, Supremacy, mid Aljoration; and such of the Justices as have not pre ciously taken the oath of qualification as to property, must take that oath likewise; bid those who have taken that oath under nuy antecedent Commission, will out he obliged to take it again. 1 am, Sir, Tour most obedient humble Servant, (Sigurd) O.ILOBKWiSE. The Clerk of the Peace for the The Duchess of You, we are happy to say, was ,esterday pronounced by Sir H. iiALFORD to lie better. Tl'e Duchess of MONTROU and the Ladies activist have arrived in town, from their seat in Scutl.ind. The Marquis end Marchioness of CAwDew snd &Indy ure expected in toren 10-morrnse conk Mats son, from their seat, the Wilderness, Kent. The Earl and Countess of ARRAN and family are expected in 'own to-motrow for the initials. Ifrom ti fir seat in Sussex. A N StDOTS OF HIS LATH MAJIISTII.-..An •ISSTS lion having been made in the dress of the Guertin, in which round hats were introduced, hie MAJtste observed with surprise, mixed with dissatisfaction, to the 'Duke of RICHMOND, the author of the new fashion--" What ! RtatisoNDl who ever saw Guards in round Hats ?"—" 0 yes, Sire !" answered the Duke. " my hat is toned."—" Aye," rejoined his MAJESTY, "and so is my night-cup." We have sincere satisfaction in hearing that his MAJLSTY, with the munificence of a Sovereign, has declared his intention of fulfilling to the letter all the intruded bequests of the late KING, his revered Parent, though the settlement was not executed. His late MAJESTT'S intentions were hilly set forth, and though the deed had not received the signature and seal required by law, the present KING feels that they ought to he sacred to a Son and Succes sor.—( Peening Paper.) Palaces take their names sometimes very inappro. priatelv. Carlton-house was named after those who once .resided on its site, of whose dwelling no exter nal vestige remains; yet it is now Carlton-palace. Sir W. E. WILEY declines Grantham. A must singular advertisement appeared in the LiNeohe Mercury of Saturday, being an 'Wren to the elec tors ul Grantham, signed " fl. MANNER, ' " re questing them to elect Mr. FELIX MANNERS, of the Foot Guard., at the ensuing general election. The reasons given why they should choose him are, that " an artful, profligate. infamous married wo man" has eloped with hem to Marseilles ; and, if elected, Mr. li. MANNERS rays. the Speaker's war rant, on a callirf the Douse. would be the means of restoring him to leis egotism. friends. On ouch national grounds the worthy electors can certainly do nothing less than elect him. • • ' ' • •,' Arrivals tot Edinburgh-- The Blosequis and Illigrahisasses of Bate, and Edmond Livingston. Esq. Departures—.. I The Earl awl Opealess of Morton, and Lady Pringle sad family. - *l.l rri • Captain Rolltßrilli t iruttuLD ( son of W. PITZEBEALD, Esq. or Affitaid-sle-Causp to Admiral Bill/Ns is +WPM' • r in the Patriot Army. Another letter hat lateeseerevierd from him by his frieride, dared. Novestehee 4. at which tisue he and all hie apqosisitosirce front Ibis 'city enjoyed excellent health. ,and were highly de lighted sslth, their eittatioto.l--/LimeroitAPaper.) ......... Irv , •eV I M.. MO Ad= .11 , MN 411 , .II i• COURT OF RINQ* 111124 CH, CutconALL, . . To !mai, .reIIOVART • • • Sittings spar Tens, Were the Oust .Lusttsx •N Cowmen Jarriest HARVEY'S SAUCE. LAZIpIIT 11. llMatta. CAMS. l This six* an .action brought by the Plaintiff, Mrs. Elizabeth Lazenby. against the Defendants, for an injury done to her in her trade. The derla ration stated, that at the time of the injury, hell's. * Lazenby was the sole proprietor and refiner of a certain sauce, called Harvey's Sauce, which was sold in bottle.. with lobe's setting forth the same, and that the Defendants having been aware of the prethisei, joilited • number of labels in imitation of theirs, sod sold thein to Messrs. Harvey and Hallett, droggists, to be affixed to a spurious composition in imitation of the article prepared by the Plaintiff, by which the latter was greatly in _imps!. not only in character, but also in the sale of the sauce. • .Mr. Scapi.zre. who stated the case, said, that „it, was one peculiarly well adapted, and of peculiar --interest, to • Jury of the city of London. He hoped that every Gentleman of the Jury he was address 'big aspired one day to lie an Alderman of the isle. tropolis—and it *SS with great deference he 'laic , that nothing; was of more importance to Gentlemen connected with the city. or ambitious of its bomb*, than that a sauces* celebrated as Harvey's. and so celculated to add to the enjoyments of a citric board and the Lord Mayor's less% shook' be pre. served pure and unuilulterated. The inventor of this famed sauce was a Mr. Honey, who ' kept an inn at Bedford'. It was found so grate ful to the palates of epicures, and so much to improve the flavour not only of fish, but also of beef-steeks and mutton-chops, that his house was made a resting place by all who had any pre. tensious to science its the eating way. and was visit ed by numbers not only from the east but also from the west end of the town. Mr. Hare;, after realising a comprtelice. retired froth boss 'WM and estob6slied his sister, Mrs. Lazenby, in the inn. Previous to tins time a home had been spewed in town for the sale of the article; it was sold in bottles with labels annexed, the con eluding words of which originally were—" li'.' B. None geibuine except signed by .we, Hires;." — At his death, that was altered into—" Nose, &e. exceptaiigned by me, Elizabeth Lazenby." Mrs. Lazenby camel on the business for some years, arid then transitory' it to her sous, who now conducted it. They had an extensive trade in the article, by wholesale and retail, many dealers in town and in the country being glad to purchase it fur re sale ; but they had to complain of most serious injury front the great number of imitations sold, as the original IMUCC, which both lessened their sole and let down their/charecter. As an illustration of this fact. lie might mention, that on one occasion five bottles were brought in to them 'to ban the lii -liels altered, which bad become very old, and thtir discovered them to be spurious. It was accident which at length had led to • discovery of the fraud to:a certain extent. A boy came to their wareticnive, No. 6, Edward-street, Pontoon-quart, with above 300 labels. which lie said he had been ordered to deliver there from Messrs. Cocks, in the Borough, but of which they knew nothing. One of the sons examining,: found them hot to have been done with their plate, but in most respects a close . imitation of those used by them. They then di rected a gentleman nf the profession to call on, _Messrs. Cocks, and inquire into the circunistauce.l He saw Mr. Benjamin Cocks, who told him that the boy seeing them in the shop with Mrs. Lazenby's' Name, had taken them to her by mistake; that,the r r ' hid not been designed for her, bat had been ddue . for a gentleman who promised to call for them. 'lle , even justified the p - •:ig of them, stating that the plate had been done for Messrs. Hallett and Harvey, and that he saw no harm in it. The Plaintiff there •cure charged him, that bring possessed of a plate 1 similar to hers, he had, without her authority, and to her prejudice. in trade, printed these false labels. He (Mr. Searlrtt) was informed that the Messrs. Cocks supplied a great proportion of the chenSists and druggists of London (for they too, it was to be regretted, now manufactured sauces) wish labels, from which fact an idea might be formed of the extent of the injury the Plaintiff hail possibly suf fered from the Defendants. Mr. Benjamin Cocks was not indeed so communicative when on a former occasion he was placed in the hox.—(ln an action 'gallon Harvey and Hallett.)—He had proposed to make retribution to Mrs. Lazenby after the com mencement of the action, but it was in a curious sort of way, for he stipulated that she should pay the costs. Ile trusted the July would now give such a verdict as would not only preserve the palate, of the Corporation of London (ruin being offended • by spurious sauce, but also give a protection to fair trade. Mr. Lazenby was then called and examined by Mr. GURNEY—Ia son to the Plaintiff, who carried on the business of preparing and selling fish sauce, at No. 6, Edward-street. Portman-square, and was succeeded by himself and his brother, in the latter end of the year 18IS. Ile was the proprietor of a sauce called Harvey's Sauce ; Harvey was brother to witness's mother, lie kept an • at Bed- Isford : the property war given by him to her in the year 1793. She has been the proprietor as long as witness's recollects. Witness thy' proved the mi. ginvl form of the label till the death of Mr. Harvey, in the year 1813 ; and also that from the second plate, with the logeature of his mother. The proprietorship waa very valuable; for some years past the sale has eitecitled ' tiro thousand pounds a year; they were aold at tisOshillings a bottle retail, and one shilling and sixpence wholesale; recollect ed a •boy of the name of Hooper corning to his shop, tie believed in the year 1816 ; lie brought a parcel of labels, above 300 in number, from Mr. Cocks's ; the imitation label was then handed in and proved. Witness hail known that there had been pieacies of the trade. but could nut trace them out before. Cock.'s bootee seat then known by the - mime of Elizabeth Cocks end Co. printers mud engravers, Thoni mi-st net, Borough; they had nerve been easPlOjed by witness's house to print label*. . . • Csala.esamisted hy Afro MARIMATT—Priw to - mow your mow, sum roar p . m!, varsonausso sum rw gars lona, bat not sinee. t ite-ezespiefoi-41inIngirik Mel ly from h4ll uncle, INA he had given Inv godlier the receipt for making thowelichs. , e, • • Henry Powell' eastislistal.4,4llgeol in the trade' a iootee. Mt* plelfles ; of The isiiiiJo• called " Haraey:a ,Mateo,' . it it its, t'ilikVieqpicif ;l i it its the property of :Wm. Lazenby ; atwaykls n egbili it of het; know her to well it for 15 or 16 yogi;. remembers both Mr.. 14..34 labels to he• in nee. ' Witness Yrold her ihoset'3ool: r year for the loft eight or n i ne y ew s. The hoe spurious bottle+ were then abeam to ailness, which he pronounced ant geruient by the appearosice; these were muddy, the genuine, transparent. Mr. Greenfield, Attorney for the Plaintiff, stated, that by her directive. be called on the De.'j fendants its April, 1817. isroduced the 300 labels to Mr. Benjam n Cock*, and asked by whose di. rectinws he had printed them ; he said fie had engraved the plate by the direction of Harvey owl flatlet*, chymists. in Queen-street; theitiseide, three or roar Yieery befqre, aid had stiock off labels as their trade required. The 300 hr had struck off for • Gentlemtm who hod br4 in their etriploymelot, and who was to call for thefts. and that the boy by mistake had taken them io Nit.. Lossenhy',. lie offered to give op the plate. %Vitoria would not •iake it ; Cracks said be laid done it without Mrs. Lazenby's consent : it was die custom of the trade ; ittirgo fiat* in it, Ind would d 6 it again. cillEll .Imm:a here remarked, quit the 'befeadatit could make no legal defence against sits irvidence,.and rooscoutooded kith, Counsel on both sides to consent to a verdict being taken far the Plaintiff, to show printers that they had no right a Lo do what the Defendants imagined they might. This was .{;reed so. His Lordship then told the Jury that there was no doubt a printer wa• not at liberty by law to enable or soist ally person to com mit a wrong, by aching ins Article of his own. IIUCCIII 11. wirsatons. This was an action to recover 288/. the price of •tfro acres and a huff of land. ihiCh the Plaintiff, • Gentleman of !otiose, had been compelled to as sign, so the trustees for mokiog a certain read. The Defendant was their sole treasurer, and the action was brought pursuant to the directions of a special Act of PurliaMeot. Mr, 0,101)01f examined..—ls solicitor to the trmtets --!Mr. limby a o . ! ge is sole treasurer—Mr. Grantham . ~ . was surveyor to them—does not know whether be was lewdly authorised to intake purchases fur them, but knows that the trustees have in some instances confirmed his contracts.' - Witness then read an entry from the militates of the trustees, describing the contract, and cootaisting a resolution of the trustee., approving of it. Mr. Tieker's surveyor proved that the land was taken possession of by the truiteriisitheyeur 1816. fly the conseut of Mr. Guitoirr. the Defendant's Comore,. the Jury gave a verdict kw the Plaintiff, with 2001. damages. . - . * WATKINS v. IitITTBIESS. This woe an scion to recover t(omages for on as sault. It took place so far back as June, 1816, and .-the Plaintiff wit content to relitiqdish further pro -teedinge, its the Defendant was insolvent, but had been compelled to come into pour;, in cousequeuce of • ride obfaiiied by the Defendant. The Plaio- Alf kept • yobbo-Wm it Hackney, and employ ed the Defendant todo souse work for hint, but Me latter delayed completing it or long, Wha t be was Obliged to employ another person: • Stutters them came to his horde. Died very obuiiee language. and made - a bloW itirrstot. but utuntentionelty struck his lige in the figig ? „ Under them eiromerleamas o the Jury, under his Lordship's dimolioooffPoOff s'verdict for the Plain tiff—Damages ls. sttiTB V. Durres. ' This was an actiou to recover 461. 31. 6d. for money had and received. Mr. ScARLETT stated, that the Plaintiff having been iti 'business as a shopkeeper, and having be come embarrassed in his circumstances at the be ginning •of last year, sod desirous of doing equal justice to all hi. creditors, proposed a composition to - them of stern shillings, ist the pound, which was agreed to by them all except the Defendant in the aedoi. ' Hearrested and sent him to prison, in con serkuence of which quay others of them did the same. 'The Defended was • cheese-factor, and . had sold groodstopthe Plaiatilt in his own name to the amount of 580% which war comprised in five ;-ditreient sums. The arrangement respecting two of these, he said, he shoutd 'leave to his principals, on whose account he 'had sold the property, mid that he was authorised to settle for only three sores, viz. 3071. I Is. 841. on account of a Mr. Edwards, 87/. 3s. 9(1. and 64/. JO., fbr property of 'his own. 'After sometime, the property having been greatly reduced'bflitigation, the Plainti f f could only offer 4r, in the politic! ; Defendant consented to agree to this with respect to the -two latter sums, but pro tested sgaiost doing so for the •nionefr doe to Mr. Edwards. But he propoied Ihat Smith's Wife should meet him at the chambers - of his attorney, and pay him his dividend; reckoning at 7s. in the pound on the 307/., and 4ki. sin theta* Other rums, together 'with 171. hit total id the legal proceedings. and that tken he wolildotibieribe the corupositiou paper as at do. in the pound _op the - aggregate 4591. ss. 541. beiug 01/. 17e. This arraugentent was accordingly curried into eifiet. The object of the action was to trompet the Defendant to refund the amount of 3a in the pound on the sum for which lie had secretly received 75., which the Learn ed Counsel stated it hod been settled in many cases lie was bound to do. Fe ederiek W. Carter, Solicitor for Plaint fe; era mined. —The Plaintiff stopped payment in February 1819; there was a meeting of his creditors on the 13th, which wrs adjourned to die 16th. On the 13th a Mr. Ray gave in his name as attending for Dutton. Smith was sweated by Dation in loot Easter Terns for 4004 and upwards. Cross-examined—Defendant is * cheese-factor, Never heard Mr. Smith say, that part of Dutton'. debt Was . due to people iu the country. • Br-ezannisted—Tiro at, the creditor*, refused to sign the compositiousgaigai t till sewing" seen Mr. Dutton'. digitate* - ' ''" • • • Nr. Runty, ' Defe: something had bet . .' fi u l {. 178.00. and 171. the costs of the beit. was • t .how smash: -Outlaw said in hispeasenee, hod 77' , 7 . that la load ff . 494 . au 0 chose. NI•01;01•4 1 . 'Outten ten d ` iss him he was tie . fictive 7s its the pourril ON La Witness weut out of the tom , o zyipiffainu* ;le ; payment, knowing it to be illgg 'nee dursil : te l .iornimsition wire three put it, end reptl e susil the pow ; of Dutton appeared as a creditor compouudnig r u e! Sews witwen nosperwatned.—Dation said, e+ i wards would not eniur iu on • lower terms thati"o.) in the pound. Mrs. Smith thanked Dutton for , . 'perittoding Edwards to accept that. Mr. Cuirtv addrehed the Jury for the Defend ant; contending that the action was a eery shabby one, since the sum claimed of Alr. Dattou had been pant to Edwards. Mr. Beckwith, a goo•malter, was then called, for 'the purpose of sheaving that the additional throe, shillings had been paid to Edwards ; but his evia; dence did not go that length. • One or two other witnesses were called, but thee', 'proved nothing material. The Jury, tooter his Lordship's direction, found *0 verdict fur the Plaiutiff, for the sum laid in the declaration, with ens. units. INsoLrgsvr figRTIIRS' COURT, Tuespartr, Feestua,nr 15. • JUDGMENT. COoDa V. annattaii( Jolt. *soya. The circuinstences artists ease tie nopertall op Thursday and Friday last. ' The CommisSionEit this day observed, that there was no strict obligation on him, in giving his judgment, to do any thing more than to give his assent or dissent to the dlseharge of the 140 0 1- vent ; but looking on iris u : efiWe of gr;wl' pildsc importance, as there must on either one side ei the other be evidence as infamous us ever came before any Court of Justice; he would allude to the leading features of the case. As' to the objection to the story of Mr. and Mrs. Coode, respecting the identity of the Defendant, he did not think it de served much attention, for if the evidence of Coode and Anderson was not true, the question as to idtti. tity was of no consequence. Mr. Cootie' if his story was true, must have thought the Defen dant one of the most arrant thieves on erirth—:yet how he could proton! to him to become an inmate of his house was most singular ; to bring him under the roof with the same woman the Defendant' was said to have defrauded, and he, Coode, was now married to, seemed so contrary to the general feel ings of mankind, one would suppose .11 could nut be possible. Yet Coode in his evidence admitted It to be the fact. On the other hand, it was im possible for him to believe the story of the Defend ant. He could not believe that if lie gave money to Coode for his protection, he would not have used it when he was arrested, or that if a fraud had been•practised on him by Coode, that he` did mit inform any person of it but his S olicitor. Ills otitis witness, Bardine, contradicted him, and said he knew of it in Atignst. Then supposing flardine'did know of it, such he not have known it was a considraCy on the part of Coode ? he knew the lies of Enand, and must have known it wale transportable o ffence. The ivory told by the Defendant and Bardine its to the proposal mid, by Coode in Whitecross street prison, to make the Defendant a book - ripe, -a ~Bardino sidsply 'muffing that it was not passible, could not he credited. For rusty owe, whether Jew or Christian, educated or un educated, had • similar same of feeling wheat they received an injury, and if the Defrodoset's story was true, be must have considered Coo* as great a scoundrel as ever walked, and could not hive re ceived such a proposal so quietly. Sardine also cootradicted the Defendant as to his changing the ducats for hint for a ten pound note. It was a natural quevtion to ask. how did this infamous transaction come to light ? did the Defendant bring it forward ? would be have 'ltemises:id it if Coode had net opposed him ? they had ever, reason for supposing lie would not. Then, on the other hand. if it was true, would Cootie have volunta rily come forward to upon it, for he• MOS. have known by his opposition, it would come to the knowledge of Goveramert, and that they would institute proceedings against hint and Mr. Ander son, sad if it was true Coode could have ow de mand against the Defeadant. On the whole of the evidence, he had come to the eonelusiou, that the story of Mr. Coode was true, egad the evi dence of the Defendant an outrage on every thing in the shape of troth. He would think him self justified in finally remanding the Defendsut ; but as another person, who was at prison out of the country, might have an iiiteirestie examining him, he would allow him to be brought up *pin on the a pplicatiou of any of the parties. The Defendant was remapded. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. CIIIIIENWILL. 111111UMIT'15. FRAUD IN COALS J. Bomptos was Indicted by the Coal and Corn Committee, for having on the 4th of November last delivered at the house of John Heideman, New. road, eight bushels of coals, without a meter ticket. Mary Hardeman proved, that the coals were de livered according to order, by the Prisoner, on the 4th'of Novetpber, and that at the tinte of delivery the ticket wis handed to her, and . 14 purported to be a meter ticket. The witoml suspecting tbit there was some deficiency in lite ratty of coals, mentioned the circumstance . lOtter,1 Otter, who wedtatisy, and shortly returned stit "%Atm, whom htirepresented to have been the pet*a Whir signed the' Meter ticket. She then sent her dough', ter to the' Meter Office, for a person to re-uiemorr the cools. This girl wee also produted, end ptuved that she delivered the ticket et the office to a Mr; Gardner, Who imMediately told her it •was a fatal. cater) ticket. Mr. Gardner, of the Meter.office, confirmed the statement of obis witness. He stated, Lirse•it was aaveleary, when tests ore delivered from sbr Past at die coal eeereiseati to • have a Psahmeadeee Otilltir 'yea the delivery. If the'coale *fie ik-soidl it telif;,Ptiltomry to produm a relideni ticket, eS wittee n s i intoerruckeo. ',,tk•- • * :11110411111 having 'been fatly prommile , the , Jtorvet • sera et gado* of 8. 1 ' • *64' dig Me lel 4 1 .• l• ---- "TlV — iiWilluttitet s Is h•i , diettnent, was not to injure IV en example, which he t proper effect. For an offei was tree, than there was I Sun provided by Statute, but it Common Law, end aii rue The present indirtittent wa ever willing the COurt was views of the Prosecutor, in tpepresetit instance, they c considering that according tc fendant,had no more to do ic to retitle the pay mint orate ' Count:l:ices, the Court ewer of IS/. W illeam . *Mt was indict 23d if October last, the I known, with eu intelatio Gel dissection. Robert Tisdale, a butcher, of Si. Pancras,, prOsed, ilia her lost, he saw two men, the kit, •and the other it bag, fle immediately suspected w / 1 in " pursued thew, he apps .. I. brought hint to Si. P.in sernining the bag and bask they contained a dead bud , Prisoner was theo conductej garden. Upon the cross•exarnittati said, he directed the body 1 geotr's Hail, Lincoln's ha &Jived the 'stab of Sixteen el He denied haritig propose the porter that the body silo that he should have hi. Aare denied • hiving expressed dist of 16s. being given to him, I have beeu made it pound—ri, trary, he had on expectation i The porter of the College corroborated so much of tie et related to hint, and adder Meted by the Corporation of shillings for each piece. The 'evidence having been said, that the Jury must hat had been Proved against tl he was in possession of averments in the indictme stolen the body, end tin it. Neither of • three haw ed, they were bound to He trusted that the Jury a they would decide on this i that their judginent Should feelings, barrettes strong or might IsiV; M itr!sumpt the Prishier Alb intentil but yet itothitet of that kin( The Jury immediately ri Aeimittul, end the Prison! monition, was discharged. Levesdale and Swarm; twi men, were indicted- by Ja Jacob. for ad asmult, on t November; ' Esther Jacob kept a boo 1 Commercial-toad, end cohel es his wife. On the above. late hour, she was alarmed 1 the street, apparently at hi down stairs ont of bed, and which a gang of persons, Prisoners at the bar, resin moat violently. John White, who had b ran down stairs stripped, • extricate Miss incob from who held her, he was himse by the same persons. Esther Jacob deposed fu her crosioexaminotton t she White, but was not learn she w•a married. Mr. White also lolly dep his crosa-examirratioa he a son of ;slew of the name o his Majesty's service he viler He Will about to explain Coors• stopped him, sayini was quite unnecessary, as n moo than for came to •aite Witness t known all his line under a that he had taken out his DUMP. The Prisoners having bet pies ' tiny setoriwicdged th brought in • verdict accordi Ou the interposition of C coespremise eno entered in and an juvilgasent , was &live . B. W. Pmts, a respe gealleman, was potato the ing written • ford end inj character of his owe 'nadir -resided in Chelsea. The all in • letter' written by iintliord of the Furtive where resided, and described *ea probrinse that he peribly ci the. Defendant recootatend and not by a public trial tors, which it aright be parties to COSOSOL - The De mu the request 1 the Pr *imps& by the Counsel th 4:nest might be: as •snoderi peewit. • • CMAIIIMAII slid, the saslarsisaiers the Uefenda Of Abe Promote. , 'mined 11 Wass siereisaef justice, the gamut tu bin ea . the indulge alismiskdaseelbse:insaly nu ..twister him's* eduarlis at say limb iousilse Oath., @sight bit paprolospow Pager ettb•6ll4 gime eon *4. assuLd•lie sesseitti s i m pc a lbees ear much riti# tO y,6