The Sun. — London, England, 1813-02-26 00:00:00

the very next S, stliath Parhattlentgmttel t..-en more than had bee,i az;keti, Prejudices twit ~, time yield to reason. On the 406-Catholic Pe 'titions he should obserie, that their views of the Catm.lics wtte mistalett. Ile Avila aware, that th mention of these Petitions was good, but they were the offspring of ignorance. The way • in which *Telly of them b tl been drawn up anti f slirned, w , , ,, , by ordering t. .' Sheriffs-to call meet ings of the Protestant Wm. ;tants of different dis tei,:,s Be objected to a w:blic officer calling' to gether people by sects, ni ttTt especially by religioli sects. It' was calling; ogether one part of . the subjects to petition .againS\t. another ; or rather one portion ofthe inhabitants ofa country to petition ' against the rights and interests of the whole. In desiring Parliament not to concede to the tlaiinS of the Catholics of Ireland, they desired them to pass oh treland the perpetual sentence of being a divided colony. They did more, they, ))y dew ing Parliament to pass such a sentence, dirt iiii pose the necessity of causing Great Ililtain to be tor ever .t divided Linpire. The petitions, might be considered as consisting - of three clauseS : the Ist, Praying that the Catholics be excluded from certain offices-2d, That Ireland ht, for ever a di vided Country-4d, That Great Britain be in pi:r whin a divided Empire fie begged the House to consider to what conseq u such a sentence Ayoub{ lead. The tone in Which the Cutlin\i6 had urged their claims' had been ,objecced to. To this he answered, that the question was not about the tone. The question %vas not Wile titer Mr. A. or Mr. 11. spolae‘ to this or that person in a. tone which . Wal tniteption 7 able or noxious. That wits tint the quesCon',-- The. question was, whether the great hod) , of 4.-i , , , tholics were to be enianc.iptited ? Tlie qutist,itip. was not whether the Catholics were, or were tnet.:, out of:temper ; hut the question was , whk*, . . ito Catholic! . _ in atiy.of their proceedings the -0111iM could 'be taxed with a want of allegi`mice ? If there tholic was alwavi tile setae, hut not the Criminal was any thing inconsistent With loyalty in their Ca'helic. The Pe . titionera s . cOntiory• to all the proceediogs, be would he the last man to propose evidence of experience, contended, that no change' that their claims should be gritured, But, if the. l could take place in their conduct, that they !mist da4a n . ot so—if the n coe d e cattolaes eintld . be enemies to th..: realest at tCh ch. They Were not he charged •'with any acts of disloyalty or at enemies of the Protestant Chinch. But wit.; it. went of allegi;:nce, than they should he allowed natural t hey alwttld feel' irk ne's hip for a Churchtbat tb have that, which by the cornthon law they Scorned hostile to them, that seethed Thecontider bays it right to posSete,. D'',d they riot for poli- theinterests of bOth taS I'lmill-el/Ude Thee..w:ere tient power, and was that the cause, why they not the entaniva of such a Chiireli•,bittthat Church were to be eimderneed to be iheprived of their was their enemy:. wiethl ask . who part of th e , Civil rights'? If it was its4(..al whilt the 7 did, or doctrines of the. Roman Ciithoties was subversive did not wish for, he would answer, thty did trot of the Ptotestaut religion Was it purgatory, Or wish for this or that hut tor tlijrVierties. 1 absolutiott, or extreme unction 1 The petitioneis The Catholic Petititioners as , ked fro - prott'et:!on, said that they were encinies to the State ilnitto the the prote,stallt Pialtioners aslital for power. The Onvernmeata 'that they were enemies by wine', Vrotestants desired in 'aseititiliniey to govern art°. ph. he could not understand how the same then sect; the 6itholirs Okired not to • . be go- sons couhl be friends in fact, hut eneertie4 in prin.= verned by arts sect, .but by the law , they desired eiple.. Could they be considered enemies to the tint to be tried by jeres of partizans. Though State and to tile Geyernmeut, who had obtained the Protestauts knew, that if the chitlins of the l the th,inks of the house, for their In avery in de- Ottliolies were Kr anted, and if p 4 sorb of tat fending both /It theylvero comics, Oleo let their religioa were allowed to sit in ParliarAent, GI , - Petition he referred to a Committee, and let the though Protestants knew that if this tvcre the. ' petitioners al; tinst them support their ellegationa ease, evert tlett the major part of the .1.1011, , e in that Committee. Their comics produced against would he Proteatants, and would make laws for . them'the. Councils of Lateran and Constance, and the Church a;.(1 for the State ; yet they, leaved '.rant, in support of their iictuisittions; he, would that they should be governed hy,CathOlies,. The produce a strouger mid a better anthority to re- P ro te s t e uts asked for the ascendancy ()fa sect t the Att.. them ; he would produce their practical loy . for the the law. the alty against nil this infamous and abondeable ae- Protestants desired to I;Overn the:Catholic Clow* cerations unjustly thrown upon them, It was said and property, and to exclude the Catholies them- thet they and their principles were unfriendly to selves from did .blessings of the Conitituion.— liberty / Was Alagint Chamt no proof of at- Their arguments were, that lleinbers of the tachi! , :ent to liberty? Did the Declaration of Rights e urc b o f4 o glarol alone should have seats in ellataiti 130 principles that sliewed ct love of Parilionent, If that were the ease, it would be liberty I The. Deekration of Rights established necessary to have all the Scotch Members, and all no new laws ;• it (oily cotetirnieti hews tang IS e forF those who Were Dissenters excluded ; yet the .established, and established by those very tabu- . donstitution admitted them ;ill. Such was the in-, lies who were deelaredeneinies to the state and to consistency, of the arguments Willa the Calm- liberty; They were not the cite:ores, they elwatis lies,. The Protestant Petitions stated, that by shewcd themselves the ft. aids of. liberty. , After the Constitution the Parliaments were. Protestant. such proof ttl their ettachmeat, it svits, still said Isiit could it be supposed that the founders of the Oaf they neist continue,eneaties„ because •they 'Uonstitittion erected a fabric, upon principle 3 with were swayed by the. eintons of their Church.— which it was ioconsistent it V. tvi true • Unit the Those catons, and the doctrines they inetticated, Coostittition required a Prote.stapt ascendancy were ,fin•esworit by -Catholics.. What was the het the aseinilaecy was to be derived front the' alumna of the doctrines said, to be contained in King being ri.otestitot, that was the trite Protes- these canons That the Pooches! the right of de- Vint aseendancy, in Parliament the. plurality of posing Princes, and thet no faith was to be kept Protestants was a sufficient ascendancy, and that With lieretieS, ..The deposing IIOVVeV wars treason plurality would allow a coustitatiotial co-exist- the regicidal poster was treason and Murder. Ile enee of Ci t tliolicsan, Parliament. In that manner, denied that stub deetrilies helonged to Catholics. by•the plurality ot, Protestants, the true Ile. iletied those. Wito mailtethe c. arge to support proteittaht ascendancy would be preserved,' While it by any other eVidetiee, Onto by canons which the country would be strengthened. 'The pi2ople Were futile in themselves, which were an insult were identified by privilege, and fleet liteittific:t- . to reason atilt society, anti whicil they c,,te„ecs tion made them a part of the State, iron Would theltiselveS , abjured upon oath. In opposition to go to kat:et the Church. The Protestants sorb proof, arttllO the persons who brought them wawa to thitilt that a few Catholics in Perlia- forwerit, he .would quote the opinions o f the; rntstlt would be formidable,. but four millions of • cipal Root ot CathOlie I,lxiversiti.es of Europe, of C A tholles out of the :Parliament were no to be re- Satalllaitem, of Donxy, of Paris, of Linlyaile Ti t e . girded. He 41ellied that these islandi litut grolvn till(6tioti was put to then; with respect to the de to a great etiipire•unrier the 'pains end penalties posing yower•of the Pope, and the doctrine of no imposed upon the Roman Catholics. Wlieri the faith with - hereties, They all not oolydeoied and COntirittltioll urns 1110“) St lost, l'tCOqr ; •;. rejected, but scorned the iniiitttation , of snub 00e. • ed by in eking; coceessions, at different tunes,- to trines. And with respect to the 'deposit% power t tl Catholies, ; kite pains and penalties by Which ' ii particular, it sties •so abominable, that they t e e c a th o ti cs we re ;e2 ; e;r ieved, bad beert inipo,,el said they were , almOst ashamed to refute. it. To after the lloreolution, anti the toinbiess weicli thew that the ,simte scat du; opinion mailitahlecl eattaed these, Was what . the Protestaote wished aml inculcated at the.Rotnau, Catholic 'Seminary e'lottld he made the tale by which their procail- at Mayrfooth, he would read some extracts from a lugs should be r regulated, Ilot hook eoitled Tractatto c c Eccksia, • which was suede some persotts silt, that the coiv.:essif)s di' re- pat into - the .hands 'of! the Students in that,Semi moval of these naini Lon! pcualties oidilhe sub; miry, Vert: .the Right liou. Gentleman read an , ve , !fs iee of the Constitetioe. vo.,te,ika poi , extract, 'denying that Christ had giveit to the see tioners said that.in lii laud ,telprttti6ii w4s pee- cesSors of St.'-',Peter any power-over the tempo. feet ; it evens tile reverse, ' J Catholic countries ral concerns of Kings, Or that‘ the Pope had a Oroad, the toleration of Protest.4.its was - right.to free.subjects, from their allegiitilLe. In perfect than the toleration of Catholics in this the same treatise it was remarked, that though . Protestant,kingdom. The case Stood übilied t some Popes 'had put much power in practice, they there was toleration for Prototants with gnali;= ne*er asserted it asat doctrine, of the church-, and . , fications ;in this country there was nro,cei tOkTii- it was sh4Wc. , (l, that in earlierages the Popes 10. don, but instead of qualification, pains aryl' penal- tolerated the doctrine °of obedience to the. Litt tie -Yet this was' called perfeet'toicr:ition,-7 the Emperor, because in thi.in was vested by The Diet of Unngfll y provided thattlie Protestants, ri4ht all temporal authority. lii this bOolt also should -enjoy the. n o tate e.s.crciSe`saf,' their leligion, tlie doctrine of the infallibility of the Pope eves with. the tibertyotibuioing churches with , :;t.te acid it Was asserted that, no Pope ever • • . it as an article . of the Roman Ca alsOthat all public: charg!s, offices, alter honours maintained i should be opera tO natural bout Atthitlet, high and tholie faiths There , w s another ; docoment which -. o f so me . Importance the 1.10-•' 14vr, withotit any .respect 'religio" - b. the resolution of a Popish diet. It Wag asked Avhether the law Of this country did ri9t grant as much. toleration to Catholics p.s the 141:v, of any Catbolic country did grant to Prote;tants, ‘vith the acqUiesceuce of the Catholic Chttielt ? Sane Catholic Got!erainents eve not only qualification but tree toieratiurtio their Protestaift and the Catholic Lhurch acquiesced in the saint: was man Catholic . Prayer-Book. In this book there was a passage stating, that if a Gene. ral Commit., much less st papal consistory, SiTQUitt Tiresume to depose al Kiug, or free hi.is spbjei;t3 From their' u ll u ii kume , no tlioltc W as bpulid to suli mit t o it, n od that Catholic's may renounce nport wtth thc dotarine of deposing power as sabyer4;y 4 of the fundamental laws, and destructiie of d i : . . , . . the taW of this eouatty only gav - e toletltion ivith pAr.'t and ortier.a society. Ili this tool; .it was ,p 4 ins and penalties, nut merely a privation ofci\iil: ' allf,..wed that the Pi,p, wa,.; spiritual Held of the i;,% a b e hi se. n e wou ld b eg leave to ask, whatiwtre , (lilt ti, but his infillibility and jurig;liction over . ' ihiqual temper an d p r inciples o f t h e c at h o tir,,lfi o ,:. th‘3, temporal pow er .of Pyinces were denied ; rind !. dy 1 IVlany of the Petitioners against those lithos . miner; it ; c oncluded, drat if the Pop e s h o t I t pre seemed to he totally igour:tot of the fi tt o,;,Jtie. ttpitl-to wirhdrarT subj e cts fronv.their alleg!nnee, Anti•Cetholic Petitions, many of then' atl,t , : - ` - ‘lll,tlie - u grond of heresy in the Prince, suet: ,:13- : stated, in general terins, that the principles terhe-,:Mutati o n oil the p;tr,t of the Pope wv.s yain ; and Catholics were the stir. now OF ill th e Worst of • :Sii6111(1 have no effect, and tit it Catholics itCre times,, as in the tout, clthe massacre, or any other bound to defend the. King er en" against the Pope i attempt to Invade his domi leriod at which ti ,oe priaciples were supposed to himself, should he hare presided. Was this r e t tsonahle.l was itinst? nious. As for the King-kitling- power, it,wisad 7 I - VHS it fair Or ettildiki to 6 . ay,,, that after the pros. witted by the Roman Catholic Church to halms tration ofthelthinhjition—kafiv;the;Vnion which pious . , and it was declared to be contrary to the Europe witnessed, of p r , Ae ly, ll .4 4 iiici c A tb o ii es , laws of God and nature by the Council of Con stance,- There was an o th e r fk t rong proo f t h at t h e le;igiied in the same cause;--after - th't; . fall of the Pope—aftcr toleration had been etitahliShed i n Catholics 7were not destitute of allegiance, he every grefir country in Laropc, except Great 1111- tne:nit the oath of the 33e1 of his. 11 . 1:1jesty. Here tail) ; was it fair to aszett, as the Anti-Catholic this Right Hon. Gentleman read the oath. He Petitions tiiiiv OW ' their principles were still the would Flow ask what further answer was neces sfunel The Pet.itioners asserted that, the present sal to the eharge4 brought against the lloniAn Catholics find their fathers plitertained, and must Catholies ? The fietitiOns might itslert wil , q.. they ettertoin the same opinions.' This Was a monstrons i •pleirsed., lie was eertahr therwere goo;I in Vela— mis-,tlternen tof the tact. The 'Catholics had es 7 tion, though not good in tirguttient. If Lo r a I,; in tahlishrt their allegiance by nßth, atilt abjured by gal - , or any other Catholic:, w.ere tolndier the Ott that oath every prmciPle k atributed 'to thtnn thut thor of tt pamphlet accusing him with•prioriplrs cou ld b e ;tli p f ,. e .l, da n g,srous to the Constitution. Gangerous to the Constitution, would Lord Ellen- Th, i t o ath w a s ',formed by Prottf;tants, and by that borough, or any other'Judge, starer him to quote oath the principles of the Catholics were finer- , j the Council of Constance, and say that he did not t ; rined. Basities the disatOwal upon 'oath of such , i ine:.lo to direct the .charge ugaiußt the individual, principles, the C . lttholirs said further, that' they but against hill) as one out of in m illi,s. professitig .felt. ealleti-npon to definifther uncest,os on .whoin - snob thingerous doctrines ? PersolliS such as the saeh imputations were nnjustly thrown. :T.1.1t Ca..: Catholics wilt representcd to be, would be desti antics denied di theit ancestors were sttoh'frai:.• Itote of all the principles hy which society was held . tees as they were repl.esente;l to he, that they . t9geth'er. The charges against thcin.were such as maintai I net:. t i lt: doctri .es charged upon t hem,:to the . could not exist in the., nature of thingS., lit a tic troction of all order an_ II le.w. 'l'll 'e petitioners contention for power, however, such alleges, loy.i ~,,,; : l i nii t their Claims . supposed them to protess such accus::ttions, NVCrieXtrClTlely miturai. There mineiPle , , which principles , the Citholies,denied was anoth er an s wer t o a ll suc h c h arges .— 'n 4.1111, .It was said that their Church always Mt answer was; the Christian religion it ntinue.l tht same its its thictrines.. The true Ca- self. 'Front the Clergy who, petitioneo 9gainst the Catholics, it would appear,• that the opi nion they entertained of that religion was ;litter eat Moot they prayed, and when they petitioned. theirprayers they say, that their 'Deity, in hu man shape, hod come into the world, to teach and to reform it'; from, their petition it would 4p, pear, that he had ;Abandoned his revelation ; and that in all the countries of . .. Europe, the Chris thins' were in a worse state, with respect to -moral feeling; even than savages themselves ; that in fact the Deity had fled from every.part of Ettr . ite, ex cept perhaps Holton d oiOd the Colleges and C o itora lions of I,3igland.—lt was but natural, however, that those Gentle:nen should suppott a system by which all PO . ker and profit was' given to them selves. The God they preached in their petitions did not .upoear to be the same to Whom they pray,-;, ed, 61 *otherwise; their, charge+ against the Ro -I.Dati (iatholics must be false. fie entertaioed the gretite4tresPeet for the petitioners against the 11 0 than Catholics. He did not at all dispute theii. 'Motives ; but he helped, however, the time would come when they would feel no unwillingptsi , act in concert with their Catholic brethetittiagaitist a common enemy, and in a Common conic. The proposition %Vas this----to exclude for ever from civil franehiseS suob as professed the Roman Ca tholic Religion. And what was the argument ? Why, 'because Itornan Catholics were :traitors and Joardetere. if Stich argtimeots were suffered to contiiiite' in force, if the) were suffered much ',longer to mak their appearance in speechei ; 'nod parophiets, and 'petitions, he , feared the ' conse • apienee would be, that the two countries Wedd seold each other ont of their connection. If such arguments il%!re too frequently . and too stretiu ously pressed upon the Catholics, they mnst'be, at length forced into a belief of doctrines which they now denied, and what would be much WOrse, .they may he forced to ail upon Ahem.' In his opinion' they had the elements of concord before' them. They saw the. great body Of t'e 'Catholics ,petitioning for liberty, and a great 'part of the, rank and property of the Protestants supporting their tit:mantis. It was objected that the C.Mtlio. , proposed no condition. They bad no ocea- , siou to do so. It was the business of that House. to legislate for them, and propose what .eimolitions they thought necessary.' The Catholics Said, the, thought no . eonditiOns necessary ; that they likabefore given every security it was in their power to give. They bad, hoWever, no indispo sition to 0 reconciling step, to the grant of a ny thing that was not essential to their Church ; they would not, however, coniii.tion their liberty.-- They would grant every security necessary to the 'Protestant Church, provided that seenrityivas not derogatory to their otim. And it was the busi 7 nets of Parliament to find out that, by which both' may be United. A great proportion of the PrOtestatit Petitioners did not, say to that House,. exclude the Catholics for es r; day 'ill ty NA id,' take care of our church at the sante time that you legiinate for another. Such language I.'itS wa3 rational: It shankl be attended to'. lie would not however believe that "the Church of England was an enemy to the liberty ofthe'Catliti lie. He :could not believe that the, poople of lard ' were enemies to that liberty; He would Have Very little to fear to repose liimc'elf:and his caiiioon the gOOd sense atubthe integrity 'of that people.. There were some petitions' that went poiot blank against 'all concession to the Cobb lies:, and told 'the linuse that their bhjeet viitS the security the'ProteStant Chttch. In the imporC ot 'that object he fully asreed With'thein; but he differed in,theAneans of Sectithig it. They would not say to . Parliament that such' security could.be only gained, that that ehureli . .cotild be . . only noon .arced by the th 'and exelitsioo Of their u,taolic brethren, lee would tneet the wishes of all the Petitioners, ho tvcittd rerticive all their apprehensioM shoot the 'Prbtestant Church, and stir to thew, you shalt eniov even after con ecisslOoidi the - iidviiiitageS .you petition ftir--the soceer:sioit ot 'a'PrOtestant 'Mike, an episceop , ,il Church hoth unit , li-eland, and ,the. 'ise cttrity of toe Church of Scothrtid. wOold'es stablish nPcotestant ChUteli a weft ns 'Protes tant Crown H would root to the foundation of the island the principles upon 4•lich their se curity wai rested: 'Mt iligerenee Vas that the Petitioners would secure . - those blessings by pa tronage', and he would secure thew :hy.ittenggea tibn. That principle. should ..be titat,te tito.grot support bflh 0 the Cluvch and stge, brill & in a Will,. open to sany .. provision, proylAcit the Protestants: would not condition the liberty of • " , their fetid* subjects, and disgrartt 4- . '„ were about to bestow. Such n Itiessare ticahle, in the preatable he would ear absolutknetiesitv of putting ma en d to sitics, religious and u olitical. The sects too long. in a stets An end I The liberty of do, put•to that _itistwty. . ought to be unrestrained, but it should not ployed w abuse sects out of th eir outcry of religiOn should be . tio toilet suppress the voice of n atu r e and of rr first step he should wou ld he to Committee, and if that moti on were he should then propose to tile - Comatitto )(ming Ilttsolation.:-- • " That witik a view to kdiustm'fAt 3 4, cire to peace, and strength, and security l'..,:t.stunt church, autt is tLe ultimate coot tish it is highly ailTisabl-e froride Of the ''..r.verul civil and disqualifr- Rernan Clattkolic sunjccts at providiofs tba ntalnten.nce and setutity 'succe., , ,,,ioa to this Cru.a - u, iteckulling tt, t. and .se.earin; invi;htbly the Pr.)teltant. Eng !awl. und,.the L'llltrdi of St:di:and , and government, as by law v 4 . 4 ,.. Mr. GeivrrAtetlion moved --a . " tl4 House ii.' resolve itself intd pursuance of a Koolution of last Session, laws attest ing the Roman Cathonee: / ' Mr. PONSONOY seconded the Mdtion . Mr. TomLINE then. rose. Impres l with the importanee of the subject). consider himself as having ilischargt lie , allowed it to pass with a silent`, few observations he hail tomake, he every topic that could excite irritath lameitted to say, was too prevalent. mem, usually .hrought forwent when of the Catholics were discussed, was Mr. Pitt. He should state the t easel peered to him to takeaway much frei of that argument. In the, year I SOO, tion of that great Stateintatt pis' to the 'proposal of any inefisillie rest . thOliCS. .1I --e never umile a nv ( Velem. precise iittention upon tarot itlkiV et he lived five years after, he never tho' to bring the subject f o rw a rd. The Chancellor declared. that he nev k er "" Fittohintcotion being entertained by , Every person knew that he afterwards such claims. claims. No communication of " ft tention was ever - made to his friends. . repeal could not, thetel9re4 , Mr. Pitt •frs favourable to that measofe . , allow, that no argument from authorit,' I t bt t r i t l i c ieteart;tention. v inery apply their at • The c o lie believes!, ors iii i u !et They were possession .of joyinent of their religion, and lea cile l 4 I p .c O l t i.g te k tr a i t h t n i: t e 'pu seminary-for lalicecp nse t . t11 ; 1 : 118'"7 no small shrive oh political Power tive franebisc. If the law deter' tans conditions were necessary tof .he (IA not see why they should co 'ftised to fulfil those conditions. was OA important -one, in which suffer themselves. to be gail d „ b t ; ever 1) . k:1i-title. The priticiPl„„,it - i the 4 maintenance of the amid his .deposing, posVer their 11 were things that should be guar& the utinost caution. Their mained the sstae. The number benefited by ,the tenter', even If. tic vet small- It wo uld be bad r muc , h for the parpo..,e of gaining triumph of Popery seemed to be s leet of the Catholics a s any tai events of the lust years, and Part hellions in Ireland, showed, ti could not conciliate them. Tit ( than any Roman Catholic's ever et they' re. not Y s itt i til i Itrd r;itliculty t i e uo l s r: (s)ontm whonate' wereh.tSaVl (01 chtims•were in u a greater . tin too- no ok any study, came forward with no speed''orot'l!ewhen they i' ,lle wished t iu time soiree :81.11113.11aitt)iiilthtitt:1'4:StslYenlet°N11)11'na;r1t.IP'ttliri(lell(1:111:::1')rie!1:111:1111.111111t'et.:.114iritill)11:014:(1:1 the country forgot their differcere?, t i or in an 'Cillint.to free themselves . frof" Popery. Having this view of til e insist oppo..e the Motion. Sir R. ft EltON ;aid, the iion• spiike. last :would have them belie- authority of Mr. Pitt in, faVour of . . cipation, yq he thought 'he ha s 'kitoWledged that Mr. Pitt brut, 01 gone out of 'office because he cos Hostile ter iiitacileinfntielelitsdtpotiliro;.l: but an iii :,tnnce of. tlrpbasee,vi to oltltion. Then Wink! o posed to it . r in ati c ° o l ; -' l 4 2 l mo il i b l e i r i; ! i Y tit tr.iand. The rebellion in Ireland, arms Lad been merle, was MA lien. It was the rising of a emu the native Jrish agaiust the Oi the principal Jeadeti of that 'eVi test its. guelt onnecessaty a; spread about the 'PopP , .. of li temporal por.,eli, arul ro 4. eneC ptt the Continent, yet suc h t g v i a y s ei r l ep t r ° eic h n i red in gs th ro!t ti:ll"l ' :4 l °l' There it was, in ctfer.:t, 3e.t ,the, disloyalty of ourrpeopte, st!, of our soldiers :e% ;l l . l l d o, s tr uc i l: l6 , talc 'navy; that-mat , „„„rt tilat ot -se - eare us from , alurul• Among the .Multiinsle sented to the 'TlOnse he believed that not more dcj.: , Bic l{ o. Enghincl -been. vivre:! at ut ; igholitnirts of the (14Tc:rent c() 9t Tl . He held iii his Owl been pablished oppoicitnt,,:;,o'ed! aod which had •,bec'l c , c e,ol!..ii 0 tone that it might ha ve r it.t tit), bate, before it was posvl.l..e. o it , pro 4 ud from Ireland. - This • Society , which gave itscli i e4 i tili '0 164 ' .‘, Leasure*o,l,7,l i 01,1(1 s q p"rtt., . ,; ~. „,,to ail in , he sects 101 4 .0 , A n en d shatim ~., I f the ?No- 1 irty ° uld not 11, :n E 4 1 hoo a n e uiancet 4' 1 , ei . et longer "" it - of reaaou , 1 - s f C 4 b O I e 21 1 11 1 : e i tt na e le; Ce4lrd:4; 3 l ,‘ 1,4 , Plq :nt as ma No; 1' tray of toc tit 0, ''. cotrord of fel • ;ovide torus` I 0 , 1 orations ulkriiiq, 1 t 4 at 1, 0 ' 0 %441 pigoP' l ,, ef izolg, p ' b l t i e t I b A r e Q l i : o t o l: 1 : ' ' i : l4 3: . - 5 0 , 11 1 . ,! abli)Ject. 1 i rota a e c° 7o l, In, to tsar! ~ • Matioil. ,gO.l prosetiVkOt . t I be -' i( jec . .1 1 a rge d 111$ f l en t vu . irj, id cs bee, . I,V i ta tion,7o4 4. A t ilt., 0 co s, when the, o pi was 04 ol 4r,r reitsous for , l A it ,, Ai from ti , 1 , 100 t heir" 1 , , tk P hic° til' ti r espreti"l" ®t 0, ticclaratioo•A • t i atl , o t lee . alt?_ re r tho u 11 0filri, 'The l'Ec' e o f A ,vcr ,010. v sir' t ea I l}, kc ool4 / rwards toio#, Litt of Iv! lends' ro t 1 !teltircP ' 4 e , I 1 wow' ' , y,t4 tstborit , 1 0 ~ the eq, h c ' u . i ii 1 os ~ ..in . t o ' 4 7' 'bey - alsol :c f i r :: ; ii fro l l i . . r o 1 , . , r c erou t ,t o 1 noir' 68 rho ti l IL l, ,,.tir t .l:it i ci l yt. e t ,:h. :l , : coi f fi o ,‘ h tc :rl ) ,. ' :' vjoji, ' . 5, i,i,401,. ... 1.1, -: . ,. , ..! ,. . t l , . 1 f , ct l l l . ie iintici! ~,, a i i SO IA 1 . i r l:i S i ni u ; ll l : : l , l l l . . ; tlt; ., '. . that col. . 4 ley enjo):0 . ~ 'int! IJ• re ° e to ' l , t i t rtsP', II ' c d of, ( 7 0 ., . ' 114 1 ' '. l I nii ra to, '• .1 _......,:t. ..--.:, ':. 14f;";:4'0.' f " ())i(• $ 4 1,4 W: -it .ftor- . '.i a- 0 . PA I e l ,)ri .014 1 e r 1 iil o' l .-i , '..': ou . t o. ,• . Cat il it, , , : 1 hit( ) ":'• . t O tt tV - i - r- -tlit 100 i ll r- 1 t t i,‘ .1 . i . os. pIA v‘ f -, . 1 ITN: - ' 4 q 1 ' lere" ' ;4: A IA v.: .111 0 6- , ti: ' • % 1 cliiq ll tJitfj ii zitlr l vlt,'., '. It ll i i)oie. 14 va a i I 0 • ~ .41 pn)iftiq) f,, .1 o tl ii4 it--I,H= - ~ !I ) h . Cl !;''' , -' :it c 7 0 :. ,44 I t4 t4 „ '2e i;,. '' lll c it til ( !' . 44 I