The Sun. — London, England, 1807-06-18 00:00:00

Li IP 1-11.7 PORT. COURT OF CHANCERY..Jv'x.r.,I7 THE ARCIIBiS:TO? OF YORK V. THE MAYOR AND COR- r.nA110,..1 OF THE CITY'. OF YORE" In this case the Archbishop filed his Bill for an Injuntti. n a4ainst the De.teociants,to.restrain them fro n detnoli.hing or pulling down the gates of the . City. of York, by which the' Plaintiff apprehended he would sustain injury or loss of property. The . Plaintitf claimed a prescriptive right to the toll .of a _great annual fair; called 'Lammas . Fair, in which A great ;lumber of cattle were sold, in the city of York. It was the usage fur the-Mayor, from . time ',imme morial, on each fair day, to deliver up to the Arch-, bishop the keys and gates of the city fOr the day, in order themore advantageomly to cone& the toll, and prevent the cattle from : passing without payment of. such toll ; he aliedged by his Bill, , that he would stiffer lo6s and inconvenience by 'the want of the gates. and would find difficulty in . coneding:the toll, which would not be - So produ&ive to hitn, if the ateswere taken down, as tile Defendants intended, and - had adually commenced such pulling down, at one of the gates, previous to the Bill being filed last year, when the Plainti& obtained an-injunction.— This Itijim&ion was this day, after being in force seven months - , moved to be dissolved,t he-parties con 7 senthig to try the right by a feigned issue. This issue' was found difficult to be framed, as the terms•of it, when made some time back, were,- that the De= fendants had broken "down the posts of one of the gates, by which the Plaintiff had sustained loss or injury.; but, -on consideration, it was found that such an issue could not be proved in any .manner, being in fad a falsehood, fur that .no fair had been. held there since the trespass was commenced, nor could any be held before the next AsS'izes. It was much urged upon the Court to di , sblVe the-Injunc lion upon the terms offered by the Defendants ; but the CILANCitiLOA stated that. be could. Jit:coMply with the motion, nor dissolve the Injunaion, : on, the. - grodndionted he, however, a ;wish that the parties might agree-upon Some.tean.s a - an issue, and desired, at some future tune, to see whit issue could be framed for this I r an pose. At the' rising of the Court, it was sUggested to his Lordship, that the Mayor and Corporation' were willing to agree to the terms of al , y issue ;' but the Counsel of. the Plaintiff said,,nothitig on thiS.occa si.m". Thus the matter seems now to rest as Unsettled as ever. GREY V. THE DUKE OF NORTHUMBERLAND. The Plaintiff in this case filed his Bill for an in juntlion to restrain the Defelidant , fiorn searching .for or digging coals upon the Plaittitt's estate at Backward, in the',lVlartor of TynemoUth,.,in the County. of Northamberland. the Doke claimed a prescriptive right to enter upon, search.tor„ and dig coals upbn the Defendant's estate, a well as. on se veral other denominations,- to.o‘ns, and lank' in the Mdtior of Tynemouth, of which his. Grace is the Lord,•alledging, that no:copyholder bad ever before denied- or reJisted such an usage, on being paid for the trespass. committed .or' done to the soil only. " Air. Grey did not wish to see • his copyhold estate convened into a colliery," said Sir SAMUEL R 03 1 .4.04 and although his (;race's . . . answer, which. came in , i only two days ago, was taken upon Lis honour, it did not appear positively -- stated in it, that .he had such a clear prescriptive right as was cnntende4 Our, if ..such. right had in :'fat existed in the plat:4 •in question, his grace '"o•iivonld t.ot-, 'as adlitittesl by answer, give any 'coinpetialiOtt 'to any tenant, `for the damage done to the soil ;' f*br the right to-the mines or- minerals, if prescriptive - or undpubteo,would, of necessity,Carry alon th 1t the. libel:ly of damaging the . soil, in. working , the Mine's, or in : searching for such Tak.'.'.';;l:n addition to. this faCt, it.wasstatecf, that no .sucbjet i te'ral right existed - in. she Mapor .of,Tpr e .. :rnonticii—and.e%en.ifsuch,a right-11;d existed,. it bad • mot .ext ondect. to the, town: of Backward, .the 'focus in quo of this trespass iv and.ifit was a. well-founded it,would hace.been earlier resorted to and as serted: learned CohnSel 'contended; :that -the issue before tried .in this - cause; 'N'Olic. - asti6 in 180, .was rendered impro'Rer, by the persons con cerned for,. the Defendant, and 04'4. was imputable . to them i.as also the impossibility' of put.... ting ti) any proper replication to the Defendant's . issue at law, which was tried an'd .found for the -Defendant, being. an, immaterial issue, ' an d a case not triable by any issue.., ,It was mentioned, that . the. land in question was in the:possession of Sir Alatthew. White Ridley, who -was foreman of the jury who tiled the -issue. The Court of King's Bench, upon a motion for a new trial, retnseil.to set aside the verdict ; and it appeared, that stables, afid other- apparatus for the Colliery, • had. been ereded on the Plaintiff's land ; m and. his Counsel suc cessfully argued, that phis-motion for'dissolvin the injunction upon "his grace's answer, must _b e e -re fused-5 as, at a!1 events, the injunction must Stand, on. account of the- stables.and other eredions.- I•he Lox') CHANIcELLutt said, he well knew. both parties, and was very sorry that they could "not agree upon this matter. The • injunctiou stands•tu force against his Grace, and the works must ,s be dis continued. For liis Grace it w-as'.stated, that his' reason for not sooner exercising this right, was his not sooner ,having wanted to cm.encl the collieries tu.that•quar ter. . CCU RT OF KING'; B N Cli, W. iesTurNsrait, Ttitar. 17. WELSPOUD V. TODD. This was -a question_ between- the. Excise Office and Horse-keepers, to decide the question whether saddle horses let out to hire for the day,, or,to : go to a certain stipulated place and back, Were liable to. the duty Upon post-horses ? The action was brought (as we. have stated-in former Papers) by the:fartner of the 'Post*orse Duties for the Distria of bath, aoainsta stable 7 lceeper, for• duty upon ct•Vo horses, • let out by. the latter for the' One to go from Bath to Erandforct, .a.„5,06:4. about - seven the other from Bath to Hinton Bruit, Vi miles distant. The ljetendant - contended, ' that 'these% hiring; did not come ‘Vithin the meaning Of the '2 sth and 44th of the King, commonly called the -Post horse Duty Ads. The Court gave foal judgment this day, an-d their LordjiipS were unanunoutly of opinion, that whatever doubts had arisen in the caret of the King v. 'rooky, and, the King r. Swift, which- were cited in the worse of the arguMent, were fully excluded by the provision 4 of the',subsequent Sta tnte,of the 44th of the King, - in 'Vvhich the 'words " travcilim; post" had been omitted. heir Lord ships therefore thought, that the Plaintiff was en titled .to recover the duties upon the last count in . the , Declaration, respeding the journey to Brand-' ford.--4udgment was accordingly entered for the The ATTOP.N.EY-GENERAL made . the xiSnal mo tion upon the last day of Term„for all persons under rcoignizance.to_the Court, to appear &e. THE KING - 1". THE REV. RICHARD PAINE. Mi. GARROW sh e aved cause against a Rule for a Vzio Warritnto, calling upon the Defendant to skew by what authority he exercised the office Of one of the Capital Burgesses of thellorongh of Banbury: The affidavit, on. the part of the application; spoke of the fads' of the regularity, or irregularity of the Elekc.fidn, merely upon information and belief., :Mr. Serjeant BAY LEY, on the same side, observed, that as he had considered - the.several charters of this Borough . with great attention, upon another occa 7 , sion, he was requestedlo 'assist Mr. GARROW upon the present ocOsion. After stating, that the Corpo ration * consisted of the Mayor, t I Aldermen, and (originally) Mx Capital Burgesses, the Charter re~ quired, thatin case of a vacancy, a majority should be present at the ele&ion of a Capital Burgess.--- . Upon the Eledioty in question, it appeai'ed;•that the Mayor, seven Aldermen, and two Capital Burgesses, attended the 'election oft his Gentleman, from whence, the. Learned Serjeaut said, the objediOnsarae,*that there was tiot a sericient.majority present ; he con tended, however, that there was sufficient to: answer the pnivisions of the Charter. The CoUter, howerer, being of opinion, that the Charter required not a majority of the whOle Cur= poration alone to be present,•but a Majority of each integrai*pan. of the Corporation- , -the Rule made abSolute • • Tin KING t'. JOHN CRUNDELL. This was a conditional rule, dbtained- by the AttorneY-General upon a former day, for certiorari to remove an order %if Sessions of the 'Magistrates of the County ofMiddlesex, dismissing the Defendant, ,as Surveyor of the district of Paddington, St. Pancras, Rzc. into this Court, as mentioned in *l_,..ioutter Paper. _ Mr. TOPPIN,q, on the pzre of the Alagistratei,`bb sered, that he could not sustain the Orddi of Ses sions, di,rnis.sing ,this Gentleman. - The Rule .was accordingly; !n'acle absolute. JACKSON V. PONEY .ANP ANOTHER. This WAS a triotion for a new trial, upon an aiEtion of trespass against the Defendants, tier building up on the Plaintiffs party fence-wall, when a nonsuit was obtained for-the Defendants, upon the Building Ad, as - fully s - vated, in a tOrmer Paper. .Afteritearing the arguments of Counsel, on both sides,. at-great length, the Court was decidedly of opinion, that this was not a party fence-wall. but a party-INa% upon which both parties had equally a right to • build ; and that, therefore, .ani action' of trespass against the Defendant could not be main tained. The \nil Was originally built only 14 inches, and 'was carried up by the introduction of a flue, to 18 inches, which should have been the dimensions of the wall from the foundation. The Court ex pressed a wish that both parties should be.punished, and that :builders, in future, would comply with the 'provisions of this necessary and-useful A& of Parlialaient,i which was chiefly enacted to prevent exCessive.ravages, by . accidental fire. FICKMAN V. ROBERTSON. Mr. NOLAN moved fctra Rule to detain' the,De fendant, an insolvent debtor, - in the custody Of the Marshal of theMafshalsea.. He stated that, the De fendant had come up this morning to take the bene fit of the Insolvent Ati, and obtained an orderior 'his discharge upon an affidavit of service-of notice upon the Plaintiff, by her -maid servant, at Rotifer hithe. By accident the Plaintift's brother heard of the transaction, and, having examined the otfice, found the filet to be so. From his affidavit it 'appear- . ed, the Plaintiff never had a servant maid ; she lived with him as his 'house-keeper, and they lived at a place half a mile from any part of Rotherhithe. The Defeudant had -come up both to this Court and at Sur ry Sessions, to take the benefit of the A&, but was remanded, for having made a fraudulent conveyance. The original action was forthe maintenance of the De fendant's wife, whom he inhumanly assaulted and turned out of doors, and , took in her place a little, servant girl, whom .be afterwards made a most shameful and disgraceful. exhibition of, upon the trial at Guildhall, as his 'Lordship . (Ellenborough) recolle6ted ; the particulars of which trial we fully reported., The Court gfanted the Rule to slew cause at the Judges' Chambers. Mr. JERVIS--.k." Lord, merely to make the entries, and so' it appears upon the affidavits..'! 'lle Counsel, resisting the Rule, said, • that the objet of BarloW was probably to keep the book in his possession, or to give it over tO - Mr, .Gaboreau r who pretended to be the present 'Mayor ; and this was the more likely, since the very same personi . M.r. Barlow, had before applied to the Court to or der the bock to be put into the hands of Gaborean; and not stiCceedingAn that experiment, he had se courSe to this new contrivance. Among the entries' be intended .to make when he obtained the book, was the eledion of this - intruder. He said, "I am the Town Clerk. You are an usurper olthe office of Mayor ; Mr. Gaborean is the legal Mayor, and I demand the custody of the book." Mr. JERVIS, in support ot' the Rule, observed, that the single objet •of Mr. 'BarloW was, to ob taw the temibrary possession of the book, thitt tie .might make in it' the entries it was his duty to in troduce. Lord ELLtNI3OROUGII-.." Do you with to have the Rule enlarged ?" _ _ Mr. SF.Rvissaid, - that this would not answer the purpose of the party for whom he appeared.* The sither side had attempted to 'prejudice his client, by interposing faeis- not substantiated by the affidavits. It was an endeavour on the part of Mr. Buller to unite in his own,,, person two offices perfeOly dis tina, the one Miniiuerial and the other judicial; which he could not legally- conned. The'Corpora-: tiOti - Of Saltash had'a right - to . see ,that the entries were dilly inserted; and that:they were made by the proper Officer'; and, ,by the condua of Mr. Buller, they ~ were precluded from discharging this duty. The • Learried Counsel 'said he was content that hiS client should be , boand ,to deliver the book into •the hands of the - Mayor as soon as the entries were .made.' . • Lord ELL'ENBORQUGH."" YOU might have said, in a few teal words, that the Election of A. B. ik necessary to be, entered ; bht upon the at& da6ts, there is nothing but generality;•.and 'we do not know kit .you May intend to inserrsomethirig improper ; you al - e the regular - Officer; let' us know the particular duty you want 'to perform ;4-;- 'you triu,t not shroud yourself wider theSe gene,. • Mr. JERVIS. 7 , -" Perhaps you will think , it tight to direct, that Mr. Buller shouhi not inkike entries in the book." Lord ELLENBOnOUGII.—" may introduCe a certain calumnious imputation, and you in4hsuti 7 poe, if' yort please, that he would tear.opt 1.4 p leaves of the book." The ATTORNEY-GENERAL.—" Your Lordship will deem it prover that they should file their atfi-'; davits before the next term." . . Mr. JERVIS.--" 'Ana the other party also." Mr. Justice LE BLANc.---f‘ You .may. file them one month betbre, and . the party which has to an swer, a fortnight before the Term."—Rule enlarged. The business of the Term concluded with thedis cossion on the grounds of the last new trial ap plied for. Tv-Morrow the Chief Justice will sit at Nisi Pries. SHERIFF's COURT.—AssAULT. POTTS V. THE HON. GEO. MURRAY. This was an a6lion of .Asault. The Plaintiff was groom to the Defendant, and on the 16th of April was charged with the care of two valuable horses, on their way from Edinburgh to London. O the 3d of May, he arrived at .Bartlett'S Livery Stables, in Oxford-road; and the Defendant .was informed by his valet, that Potts had lamed one of the horses.. The Defendant went immediately to the stables, and taxed the Plaintiff with the fat. He denied it, and said, the valet 'had told an untruth. - Words ensued, and the Defendant Struck and kicked-the Plaintiff in the side, and gaveJihn a wound over the eye, which separated the skin near an inch. - The Plaintiff had remained ill ever since, and was at that moment attended by Surgeon Armstrong;. the blows hating produced a spitting of blood; which'it was feared would produce a consumption. •• It appeared 'in defence, that the Plaintiff had strained the back sinews of the horse's leg, by in. cautiously leading him down a hill; and persisting to deny the fad, the Defendant was vexed at the circumstance. It vas contended that the spitting of blood was occasioned by the Plaintitf's consumptive. habit, which was made worse by his being a racing groom. .. • Th e S HERI FF said-the Defendant was not justified in beating him, and the Jury would say wh:it da mages he was entitled to for the injury he had re ceived, considering his loss of time, and the proba ble amount of the Surgeon's bill. . • The Jury retired for a short , time, and found for the Plaintiff—Damages, One Hundred and Fifty Pounds. . Sunday night, about eleven o'clock, a dispute arose at a public-house, the sign of the Unic•.iru, in Scale-lane, Hull, between Thomas Riggs, MasWr of a Wakefield Sloop, and Thothas, Parker, also a mariner, in the Knottingley trade. The parties in Consequence agreed to adjodrn to Scale-lane Quay'to fT2fht when. after - a quarter of an hour's conten tion, Thomas Parker lost his life in the affray. SHIP NE /YS. POOLE, JUNE 16. Arrived—the Ocean, Rood, Dart, Harvey. William and Mary, Buynes• Atlive,: Brown, Active, Williams' ' 'lndus try, Brooks, 600 d Intent, , Thatchell, and Lark , 'Spurrier, frorwrortsmotith; Industrious, Aldrige, and Ann,...Hollo way, from Southampton. sailed—the liZieyon, Saint, for Sunderland; Three §is ters. Bangor, for Newcastle; Hope, Stanworth, for Liver pool • Aaive, Brown, for 13ritfport; Busy, - Russell,:for., Soutliainptun; and Neptune, Payne, for Chichester. itiNt ts. 'Arrived—the Maria, from Tarcelona • Andrdw and Eliza beth, from-Norway ; Thomas, from W hitehaven ; and kly,•• and l'homas, froni•Newcastle. r. STOCKS RDAY. India'Stock,' shut Indiaßontts, 7s. pr. .. South SC& Stock shut. New Ann. shut Exchequer hills . , is. :pr. tits gmniutn, •i Itnperial 3 pefeent. 6,4 Cons. tor tl pening,.Er4 • tml'publisbed by WILLIAM AR2.4lnv K SCR I rps, Soot!" Molton-sirect, C:rosvenor-squate; or. the Feper , letterr for the Editor, &c. (p)st !must be.act,:re34;.o: THE KING .V.. BV-LLER. 'Qtr Readers will recollea, that we hare-several times IM=occa;lon - to niention 7 this case during the preent Term. -Mr. Jgavis now moved to make the Rule, for wialeh he lad applied; absolute. • The ATTORNtir-GgNERAL and. -Mr. GARROW spewed cause against this Rule,the 'obje6t of which was,:that a writ of ltfundattia should be-dircaed to the:Defendant, calling himself the-Mayor of Saltash, : to deliver'Up what is called. the Constitution Book, containing an account of the proceedings of that Cor-: pciration, to Mr. Barlow; the-Ty.vn Cit rk. The,uf -fidaVit:of the latter stated; "that, on ihe•lBth Decem her Wit, made app;icati'on'to Mr.- Mier, in flie Guild .of tlie . Town, for the deliveryof such book, and that - this Gebiletnan refused to resign it. • An affidavit Was produced frotn Mr. Buller, statin4, that lie had-been frequently Mayor of Ate platfe, and that in I'Boo he was Zleaed -Recorder ; and further,Jhat thellonk Of the Constitution had alwa y s been delivered up to him --when he was so ele.caed MayoOnd ,that he had uniformly sur, rendered it to'his successors in that'office ; and he idded, that the Mayor had -always. had the custody 'di it. Lord ELLENBOkouGa" Did.;Nthe Town Clerk . demand it to retaiti it.permanently)inlis,custody:?", I.ON DUN ?tinted •by fl rctrA.tro Urn RA s,.of No. 4, •Matriett.cotitt, Ilow-itreet ; At the Sux-Orvice No. Strand; where Advertisements, Orders PRICF, .01; Y ESTE Bank Stdck, 234 Navy s per Cent. shut 5 per Cent. 1797, Irish 5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. nil 3 pert . tr Fent. Red. 63 i 3,peN tent. C9ll. .thtlt Bank f . Ann. r 7 15-16ths Ditto Short Ann. • I:l3tral, Yesterday Morning, in Pitl;'-street, GrosVenot-ttlUate ) the COunteis'inl.ianbry, 'of a Daughter. ---• _ • - • On "rhursoay. last, at the. Pars nage, Hampton, _the Lad, of the. Rev-. T. Morgan, of a Daughter: AIdIRR IE 11. . On Saruiday morning, at Clanthire -Church, neat:'Critic; lames Maitin, Esq. •of Killehora, to Miss. Wakehani, se cond daughter: of. the late Joseph E. Waketiain, Eaq. of Spring-Hill. 7 OnTUesday last, at St. Mary: le-hone the Rev. Alexander Cotton; Reelor of Girton; •Camblidgeshiie, and of Meesden, Essek. second son of the late Sir lohn 11% I,de Cowin; Bart. to Miss Houblon, eldest daughter of Mrs, oublon. orCoOpersile-I-louse, Essex, and of the late ja eertrHositTltin, Esti, of liallinbury- place, in Thesatne County : Yesterday, at Mary-le-bone Church, .Captain Stone, -to- Mary, second daughter of T. Berners Plestow, Esq. of Lower Seyniou'r- street. On the tst inst. the Rev. lames Phillips, of Churnside, Berwickshire,..,ta Miss. Todd,. of Tocistown, in the Cuitnt3r of Down.. - Lately, Edwitd C laifo'we; ' Esq . . of Dublin, to 1 , 10: Sweettnaw, •relict of -the late lames Sweet - man. hug.: bat& ristee : at LaW. . • -, DIED. On Monday last, at her residence in Charles-street, Man. chester-square, alter a long illness,' the Right Hon.. Vad!" Kirkcudbright,• relit of the late Lord, _whom sit,: survived only five years. On Ttlesclay evening, at her house in St. James's-square s the Right Hon, the Countess of Darlington. Last week, at Cork, Alderman loitn Shaw. Yrsterday, at Mrs. Tllotn,. Chaplin's, in Graft On-street, Lady Webster, widow . of Sir Godfrey Webster, Bart. A few days ago, in Bolton-stteet. Dublin, in the zsth rear of her age, after a short illness, Mrs. Newell., wtie of Ro. bert Newell., Esq. Arorney at Law. Lately, Mrs. Came, relict of the late Rev. Edward Cante d Vicar of A btrtOrd On the - tst inst. at Sherborne,_ near Malton, after a shO,i illness, Miss Miicah . Thompson, daughter of Mr.. (ohs Thompson. • s Lately, in the 24th year of her are, Mrs, Ma3on, wife 'cif Mr. Ralph Mason, .of Cundail, and youngest daughtir tot Mr. John L'Anson, of Melinerby, -near Ripon. EIIGH-WATLR AT LONDON BRIDGE-TO.MOR- ROW Moining, 21 min. after t. I Afternooli s 49 min. , after 1. - , . To THOMAS TAYLOR Es q . , c- t . Sir. No. 9, New Ilridge-street. London. T CONSIDER it but an a& of.justiee'due td , tilt, AL merits of your , LE AK E's PATENT PILL, to cons. municate to you the following clue - which has reCeutly. been . . pertbrmed by theitii--Au Acquaintance of mine,* by the breaking nut .of. an. olri Venereal Complaint (at;ended by a coinpl , chion of disorders arising therefrom), was refu dai ny,st to a ikeletoh; land all Ifout,4l he hid , tie best' adviArewixichecin Id be obtkined, and tried vari;.:cytef Pnetit Medicineso.4l 4 l4*4;l:.ott Idi.be„ procured w suit his case, or to do hint any service: he remained in a 'host tz duc.eil,Utt Oft nible-Situation for. t wo. t ears, unable.: to follnw hts.priiti;ssilu,„and scarcely able-to walk or even to and stn his leg's; in tad no one who knew hir:i ever steoliosed pc, I . ole tor..hint to recover lie was advied at i•st.to , try. yni u r tes.kei-Pilts---h t e 'did adtier.lng to • the dire ions '.givtuaiith them. •I-Ie had. inn taken inore than two boxes fore he. totind ,:tu alteration tOr - the better; this endiutaged him -to proceed, and by taking a few'bdXes intire 11C-found his appetite and strength gradually return, and: is now u healthy and stout as-any, man 1 know You are welcome, Sir, to :der any Vetson to me fora confirmation of the above account if it slitnild tleclophtett. • . 1 am, Sir, your obedient humble servant, Library, Folkstone. - THOS. RDAY. - Prepared' and:Sold by the Sole 1 ioprietor, v Loa, NI ember of the Itoyal, C ' , I . 4lgeot.Surgeons, London, at his /louse, No. g, New lirqlee-street ; Where, after a constant residence of more than Forty Years, in a practice particularly directed ,to the Care 01 Vette. real Complaints,. and those incidental to the Parrs of :Generation in both Sexeg:, with that Arivi:ilable sec recy which Men of- his' Profession should always observe, ha flatters Itini*clf, :the :advice and,a.s'sistame ha anituitous lv • administers to, Persons taking this Medicine, will ha etantethed by a discerning Public, as an advantage teldotta to be. nbtained, and void of ambiguity. Also sold, by his Appointment, for the convenience of . those living at a distance, atthe Perftinier's ' No. 35, St. Al ban's -street, -P3ll - Mall the Toyshop, No. • to 3, Oxfinvt. street ; Mr. ,Disborough's,, No. 7, Fish-street-hill; Mr. Baxter's, South-bridge, Edinburgh ; Donald's, Ctn.. gow ; Mr. Bull, Dame-street, Dublin; Mr. Billinge's, verpool ;' Mr. Atkinson's, Manchester ; and by one Person in every considerable Town in Great litita;tl and Ireland, in Boxes of only as. :Oc1:- each, sealed 'up with full and ; plain diredions, ,whereby -persons of 'either sex may cure themselves with ease, speed, secrecy,, and safety.. N. If; Every Box sold in Great lintainjs .. cale(t'itti with a stamp, on. which, by lave ur -of .COtrunissioners; 'fa prizt ed at the Stamp-off - lee. " T. Taylor, No. 9,, Newllriige, street," to imitate which is Felony, and 'all ethers are court tetteits. ..:VATHEN Professional Men of Education and Y Responsibility deviate from the generai .'yste,:r by the seleetion of a the best criterion of superiority. . • Tiiirte.:34yeir's have I devoted my 'practice to the cite I nal IC treatmem. of Three Disorders, and the successful' result of my planlyes,rne additional ardor to oppose, as t ar as am able, the' rh‘fili;es of those CoMplaints which are the muit 'important in 'the Catalogue of Human Infirmities. Atter. intleation into .every Branch, as an ii.rtny Suroo-e.,. I formal a wish at an early period of Practice to rescue in dividuals lion. the ignorance of uneducated men, or the equally dangerous precipitancy el general'Praditioners. ,The Three Disorders, to the Cure of which I have de voted .my attention, comprise every • species o f v ENE _ KILL I. E A U Y n N us , N o v i ! L-: i t e h b e i t o y !' a w r h e e c t e h u e r r a or ri s l i o n g f . r it o u r; 'italiteionha:brtistYo'f school -Ixfrys, or the intinig:inees of mature age: And, lastty, t tat dera . ngement of toe system in wt.,- -men which - is caliat I3ARRENNESS, or STERILITY. . Numerous Diseases are the result of ignorance; .or haste in the treatment of a simple Gunorrhiea; and not :in frequently happens that the seeds of I.ite are poisoned by the indiscretion of an ungttardej hOur..—lty a superior me. thod such Complaints ate easily coral : and, even :Oleic others have failed, I trust that I may presume.to otter radical re-establishment. ' Few, however, are tho cases of comp.icated .distress this. disorder, continual with the calamitous. situations cf Men, WllO, front an inzlul;;ence in a solital-,.• vice., or Ito. prevalent 'gaieties of' a fashionably-Cite, Jell:ire tiv.it7.itate of Debility, which is:the unavoidable •c o nsequ enee.:o f i nc ti , pernicious habits. ' ATltire the unhappy sufferer broods over hs Misery, lint • carefully conceals nis tnisfortinne.• it may be'some conso lation fur him to ktiow,.that 4101:nigh it be ;in ob'ic:l of doubt or uncertainty with other I', ra=ti:•ners, the removil `of these .I.)e,riciencies by . the gridit.il pro4re, - ,s of Renova tion; is the acquirement•of asy , Experience. If the ri; of much or Venus have. •bag'ait to reduce:Manly, vigour, much anxiety will be prevented by an early Couuterie tion of this languid State ; and - in these cases, no great difficulty will occur. • lint where this 1) ••eiencyhas. for years exsred, a proper perseveranee is'ininspensabLy - elnisite to rev tve the z•lirtn bering Sparks of Lite, and - to re-alinn•.re the Constitution IVIARR I Ep WalviEN, who have long been disappointed in their expedations of: a family, may . assured,. that .0 most instances, such deteels are curabie by .Medical The secresy which is su essential to my '..ndertaitnig• and the qualirications'which I have presumed to state, tbrns the basis or my pretensions, and in cou:-..-Ainice with such this-intimation, is. given, that Mr., .Lree alay. be consicted personally, or by. Letters . 0:It:losing a stn::/1 notel,,at his house, •No. 29, Arundel. street, Strand, near Temple bar. •There is an- additional •Enr k ranee. in- Water-sties', '4l)c t ining, and the Name eh both the doors. • BILEE, Member ot rtin Royal Ccdirge ofSurgeons• A Caw -rtolv..:—Soine Persons .who falsely assert them selves to be MeMbers of the - Royal College, having fix sea nil niontifs past copied my Adlertisements •word•for and inserted them thei r own pied actions, it is 0 1 Y duty to mention, that those Persons are not Mumber,; of ant Collage in London, Edinburgh, or elsewhere, nor have diet .• any right to practise Surgery in London. .