The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1806-08-04 00:00:00

ode to :longing hurbak [le M.ie LZ day luta the tut prisor.c, will la i‘Odando Al Lit 1,1 sranl this on. Ma. °Tx, :Kt ag titlS* o ▪ benefit. led inaz anznts nci M;- applatue. • pssadlt ant, in a TUOI:rn , .w.l .4 ration fcr K gs ow ratourr,tn 1141 fuf eagatifi &el Q KTt.• renovoU Is benteur• I 'Air Irom .tho arVel:lt ci.Suiroad Esq. go.' at (4. n•e' Che Less l:rnir!,: situateu• such tote els-Lauri levee. vie R.Cllll* . r S . of 114:-- rowdu -,--- YORK ASSIZES. Gorr Ifcrnjh, (late of Manchester, calico-dyer) was indicted fur forging a bit of ex,hange, value purporting to he drawn byJames Hastings of Liverpool, on Sir James Eschnle and Co. bankers. , London. There was a second count in the indict wi6n, charging him with uttering the same bill of exchange, knowing it to be forged, with intent to defraud John Ceren, copperas manufacturer, at Hipperholme. near Halifax ,her the Cuunsel had opened the case for the Prosecutor , John Green was called ; he stated, that he was a manufacturer of copperas, and that on the 14th of I.:btu:try the Prisoner came to his manufactory, and wished to purchase eight tons of copperas, to be paid f or on dclive. y at Manchester : the Prisoner tit?sepreented himself as a calico-printer, and said that copperas WAS for hi own use. The wit ness sieclinod selling it upon any other terms than that of r •ady-money. Tile Prisoner said it would be inconyeaient for him just then to spate the m'- softy, f o ci fe %iris g-ing to Bradford to buy aqua fortis. and, on his return, if he found it convenient, he writ:id call the following day and complete t to purcliese, on the terms proposed by the witness. vext day the Prisoner celled again, and the Witness sold him about four tons or copperas. at 1 il. 10,. per tits The Prisoner tendered him a bill of exchange for 981. This hill the Witness ob. lected to, both on account of the largeness of the sum, and his ignorance of the drawer and endorser. The Prisoner assured him it was a very good bill : tsar t he drawn, James Hastings, was a merchant ut Liverpool, and that he did not know much of ; but that the endorser, Peter Higgins, was a cott on merchant and manu facturer, at Manchester ; teat he kept a urge warehouse, and that lie hao sezahred the hill for printing goods for hum. On tl.is representation, the Witness, after consulting several pc: sons in corneaey with them, consented to take the bill, and he gave the Prisoner the ba lance in small bills and notes. On tb• dap follow. but our, (Monday) he gave the bill to his bankers at Halifax, desiring them to get it immedi ately presented for acceptance; and (fa the rfollow ing Moaday it was returned to him dishonoured, being retused acceptance, the drawer having no ef fects. The Witness immediately went to Manches ter, but could not find either the Prisoner, or the pew:" to inborn the bill was made payable. (Peter Higgins,) though he used his utmost endeavour for that pin p The Witness concluded by staring, that be delivered the warrant he had obtained for the apprehension el the Prisoner, to Mr. Nadia, chief constable of Manchester. Mr. Nadir; stated, that he was chief constable of Manchester, (which office he had filled for 17 years,) upon rece ivin g the warrant trims use last it ness, i eused his utmost exertions to apprehend the Prisoner, hut without success, until the 7tn of Jane ; he was sure, both from his own knowledge of Manchester, and the diligent inquiry he had made respecting Peter Higgins, that there was na such person either a cotton merchant or manufac turer in Mai.coester, or even any person of that Dime; the Witness added, that some time since, a Peter lirggins. a weaver, resided there, but that he was now is the pal at Lancaster, on a charge of forgery. Its answer to a question from the Judge, he said, this Peter Higgins was • poor man, and, he believ ed. did not get the pieces he maturfafturrni printed er dyed. Tins witness din sated, that he made the mast diligrot inqoiry at Live , p -nl. for a per win of the name of James fiasti..gs, out without surcess. James Thom:non, Attorney at Law, stated, that be alio used every means which could be suggested to hill of discoveries,; the drawer of the bill, James _ Huang,. hut without so, _-cess. Mr. Hadin. Police Officer. then produced a pncliet-hollkond three Bills at Exchange, found on tie person of th: Prisoner. It was argued by the Pri-ona's Counsel. that no use ought to be made of these VISA to the preheat:* of the Prisoner, because it could not be sorposed that he was repated to rebut any charge but that set torah in t.,e iodoa * en-nt. The Learned Judge admitted that there wet cons;derable weight in the vi jefiton, and that be 'et-wild take a now of it a last wt!ness examined, on the part el the pro- PECUtiOn, was Mr. Smith. Chute in the house of Sir Imes Esdaile and Co. Hankers, London. The hail being *hewn t.) the witness, he said they had no account with the drawer, nor with any person of that name, and, of course, it that bi.i had been pre vaned for acceptance, it would have been refused: Ise cnuid not. however. say, whether that bill bad 'aver neza presented for acceptance or not. The f:.rned dodge said, that he should take this oppor tunity of ass-enaining whether the ,!nee bills totted on Or :terra of the Pri.oner, and which were drown on the sone house. wan drawn by person. who had ace•-unts with the house. The querion being put, the witness said, that the drawers of :hose boll. %vete Sot cos:consers or correspor.dents of theirs, and were persons not entitled to draw upon their house. The examination of this witness closed the case an the part of toe prosecution. The only Wi:a-ss c-lied on the part of the Pri soner. was Mary kinekley, who sated, that she lived a: Stan chester, and w.s acquaintid with the Pr sitar...whom she 'represented to be a dealer in dyers' dings. and had loasserly ban a cotton :,:rinter and dyer $ .he always understood him to be a very in 44:StriPtlf man. Doling the c'nrse of the trial, Mr. HoUock urg ed many obit:lions. on points of law, which he ar gued with great ability. His Lordship. in his address to the Jerry, stated. tloat they had to 'agate, lit, Whether the Pristine , paid the bill in question to John Green ?-4d, Whe ther the bill wus really forged ?—and .td, Whether the Witness paid it, knowing it to be forged ? On the first point. he thoul,ht they could eatertain littli et no doubt ; it was, therefore, us the :w3 latter flirt their at:en:Lon *mold be principally directed: and to constitute it a forgery. it was not necessary to pore that the d: Jur e r and endorser of use boil ex isted, and thtt their Egnatores were put to the bill without their wrought. it wo.uld be equally a forgery if so sods persons 'listed ► or, even if s.s.b persons did eaisr, ye-, if they were in totally different slue th.r.s to those represented by the Prisoner, and that eu.; ::er }mew this, it would . ilsofy them in • finding the Prisoner guilty of. the seeod count in the indictment, which was the only count on which there was any evidence. It would, therefore, be their business to inquire, whether, in the representa tions the Prisoner gave of .lames Hastings and Peter Higgins, h: did not know they were utterly tape! , The account he gave of James Hastings, was, that he was a merchant of Liverpool, but that he did not know much of him. From the drawer, therefore, perhaps, no strong presumption of fraud could arise ; but of the endorser, his account is circurn stantial. He stated him to be a cotton-me - el , int and manufacturer, at Manchester, in a i.: , :lsikierable fine of business, ar.d that he had r:•cciez•d :he bill on account of wor k done for him. Here, then (if they could depend on the accuracy of the firs: witness), there could he no mistake. They would, however, take into consideration the evidence by which this representation was negatived. it was by a man who had an intimate knowledge of the town, and who had used great diligence in his inquiry. But it had been suggested, that Peter Higgins ought to have been brought into Court, as the most com petent Witness in the case. 'llse Jury would, how ever, take all the circumstances of the case into their consideration, and pronounce such a veidia, as should both satisfy the justice at the country, and the rights of the Prisoner. The Jury were about to retire, when the Counsel for the Prisoner begged lestye to suggest an objee , tion, which appeared to him of consider able import ante, which was, that no evidence had been ad duced to thew that the bill was not drawn by James Hastings; and he contended, that, should this be the case, it might be a E ra's frAid, but could not be a forget-Q. He also observed, that, with respeet to Peter Higgins, all that had been said of him, amounted to nothing; for the Prisoner was not charged either with forging the endorsement of Peter Higgins, or with uttering the bill, knowing the endorsement to he forged. His Lordship said, the objeCtion was of great weight, and materi thy altered the case, and that the Jury ought to lay out of their consideration all the evidence this related to Peter Higgins, as well as all the observations he had made upon it. Alter some Midler observations of a similar tendency, the Jury withdrew to consider of their verdiA. aad in about halt an hour returned into Court. The Fore man was about to pronounce their verdiet, when the Judge sa;d, he had sort: tanher observations to offer to their consideration, and which might pro bably induce them to retire again. His Lordship said. !:is doubts as to the sufficiency of the evidence, respetting the knowledge the Prisoner had of the sirower of the bill, appear-d . t i hen in a stronger light since they had left the Court, than before; there Seas one circoms aice which he wisaed particularly to point out to them ; that the person woo took the bid if the Prisoner, aid not take it on his represent ation of Hastings, but of Higgins, aad which part of ease they were entirely to lay out of their 11111.811ution. His Lordship concluded a ith re minding the Jury, that in all cases, where a teas •n -, able doubt remained upon their minds, it was:heir duty to acquit the Prisoner. kier the Jary need been nut of Court a considerable ti tie, a Jurym begged permission to ask some questi ins of ins Lordship, which brag granted, .n officer 0: the Court cooduCted him into the jury-box, when he proposed this question : " Supposing a James Hastings drew the bill, would th • mteitnx of it in that case be uttering a forged billi" he said, "they were all convi-cecl, that it was a case of great villainy; but he wis.red to have this doubt re moved." His Lordship, 'n reply, stated, that if a James Hastings lad really drawn the Bill, yet if he was a totally diffs-rent person from that represented by the Ptison-r, and that the Prisoner had so represented him for the purpose of living a fietitious credit to the bill, for Lie purposes GI fraud, in this case the crime laid in the indiftment would he proved : as for in stance, it this James Hastings was a ploagloboy, and that OA; Prisoner, knnwi g this, had teptesented bias to be a merchant " i lie Lots:ship added, " that when the Pricers ci spook: of Hastings, it was in so twee and general a manner. •hor t was more likely to 'operate as aca eflQll tha as an inchnceme.a to t he Prosecutor to take the bill. ' His Lordship again repeated. •'• that in all cases of reasonable doubt, it wa. their duty to find a P:isiiner not guily." The Juryman theta withdrew. and in about half an hour the Jury returned into the Coma with a 'm aid of—Grilty. ['he Judge, previous to passing sentence upon the Prisoner, said, he should respite the execution until he had an opportunity of consulting the other Judges, both upon the proof and upon a point of law, which had arisen in too trial ; and thoegh be thought great credo was due to the Jury far their patient attention to the case, he doubted of the proprisrty of tlicr ver dia andthought the evidence was too silght trajtortiv • terda f gasky. Under all the circumstances of the case,. that they ought to have unrifled Me Primmer. His Lordship acknowledged that these observations *Pouted to trench upon the peculiar province of the Jury, and therefore it was on the point of law that be principally justified to himself the respiting of the execution. His Lordship then posted the sentence of the law upon the Prisoner iti use usual manner. W. Tcrrtatt, Esq. has offered himself a candi date to reeresent the borough of General Mack has published a DecLuation, iu which he requests the public to withhold their judgment. all his trial is finished. lie remarks, that sa the late unfortunate war, he was not the principal in command ; but that he managed the aff.irs of the campaign simply as Field-Marshal of Artillery. The Olive BrameA, Rten•ans. from Baltimore arrived at Cork the 117 ill ult. On the 20. i, in lat• 50. 52. long. 13. was boarded by the Brithasit fri gate. who said, there were two or three Frenca fri gates in that quarter. The Surinam, &Alice. and Demerara ships (about 30 sal), sailed from Demerara the 16th June, un der noavor of gen-goo ship, for Grenada. Koutsford Races. which commenced oa Teesdar, premise to be more brilliant than hare ewer been remembered. as His Royal Kgliness the Duke of Gtoncestsa honours them with his presence. liia Royal Highness arriveJ. on Wednesday, at Tabiey, the magnificent. beautiful, and IWSpotabla scat .4 .sir Jong Latcssraat It. LAW' INTELLIGENCE. , —......._ COURT OF CtiANCFItY, I.lacosa's4ms, Aseusr 2 BODKIN and MARY hi, vrtre V l3ltV condemn and tire ATTORNEY.C.E.ritAL. Mr. R l ea & not, oa the part of tae Plaintiff, moved, that Mr. Langden, the Defendant. be compelled to rbring a certain deed of feoffment, executed by one • Henry Holley, in the ;tar 164. i, into Court, for ti.: inspection of the Plaiiitiff The grounds anar whirls he made this inetion„ as stated by the learned Gen tleman, were as follow ; la the 221 year of the reign of Charles I. Henry Hanley, to whom the present Plaintiff claims to be heir, being seized of an estate in fee, the value of which was then about I`.lol. a year, executed a deed of fenffinent, by which he vested this estate in the hands of trustees, for divers charitab:e uses ; one of those sa ri, the !....01. a year should be allowed to a Minister, for pet form ing Divine Service, once ever y Sunday, in the town of Nottingham. The ocher grants in the deed, were of a similar nature as this, and in case the ser vices were not performed, the money of course would remain in the bands of the trustees, for the benefit of the heir. The Plaintiff. therefore, alleging himself to be the her, filed a bill against 'ilex Longdies, who is heir to the trustees, appointed by the deed, and prayed information with respell to the nature of the grant. The Defendant, in his answer, stated, that it was not the estate which Henry Hanley vested in the hands of the .trustees fsr chat itable uses, but merely a rent charge on the estate of 1201. a year. The Plaintiff, however, queltioning the truth of this answer, now came into Court, and prayed that the Dlfendant should be compelled to bring the Deed of Feoffment, of 1646, into the Master's Unice, for the inspection of the Plaintiff. Mr. Ricira ens futther stated, that if what the Defendant in hi; answer stated, was clue, namely, that it was only a rent charge which was vested by the deed in the Trustee., he was aware, that it would be impossible for the Plaintiff to recover the estate ; 'he Defendant and his ancestors being in possession for a period of l t;0 years ; but the deed itself tumid show wh-ther it was not the estate itself which was vested ; and, in that case, the heir would be entitled to the difference in the value at the tine of the feoffment and its present value. There was also another point to which he wislid to call the i t attention of his Lordship, and that was, that even if what the Defendant stated in his answer was true, still the Plaintiff would be entitled to the different annuities forfeited by the non-performance of the services direfled, and, in point of fed, he beneved none of the annuities had Seen paid for many years back. From these consid‘rations, he hosed that the deed would hr produced, as by the wording af that, every thing would be sett:ed. Mr. HEALD, on the same side, said, he was aware that the Court would not, in general, suffer a deed to be produced, for the purpose of picking holes in it, as the term was in the looks ; bur, in the present case, he did not think this Rule could obtain, as the . Defendant was merely a trustee. The LORD CH ANC ILL° a observed, that he thought when the Plaintiff called for this deed, in order to turn the Defendant out of possession, it was picking a pretty large hole in the deed. Mr. Cu c c en, on the part of the Defendant, said, it was impasible to put a man 03 the proof of his title, who had been in undisturbed possession for a hundred and sicty Tears ; the heir at law, he said, had not a spark of equity left after suck a length of time, and he therefore hoped the motion would be refused. The Loan CHANCELLOR said, a Coon of Equity could not compel a man to shew his title-deed in destruction of his own title, particularly as he had 1 shewn in his answer, that the Plaintiff could have no claim on the property. He therefore refused the motion, but riot with coats. SWINTON'S BANKRUPTCY. Saturday last, the Bankrupt, A. Daffy Swinton, underwent another long examination at Guildhall, by Mr. %%resin, as counsel for the creditors. He again went over the same grounAs as he had done the day before, of whieh we have already given an account in our paper of Saturday last. He con fessed that all he had sworn upon former occasions was false respecting his b.icks. He admitted that the profits of the sale of Dalf a 's Mamie" of which he was sole proprietor, amounted, on an 'average, to from 12 to 1,4001. per annum. His daily accounts, he said, were kept on slips ut paper, from which, at the end of the week, transcripts were made on sheets of paper, but what became of them he could not tell ; they were also transcribed into the ledger, but by wbnm he did not know; sainctimes by Wallace. and at other times by Miss Moore, (a lady who lived with Lim as his companion, and hy whom he had some children,) who chiefly managed his busi ness and kept his accounts He also produced a book, which he had received from Miss Moire, through her son, but neither the Bankrupt nee the boy could tell where she was. This book he admit ted wholly to be a fabrication, from which the ui t rust leaves had been taken out, and blank or ruled ones substituted ; these now leaves contained fabri cated entries of his deli transactions in business, and be assigned as a motive for making ose cf it, that was without any regular accou.,ta, and being assured that he most produce some book of attrutes boors the Commissioners, he Laureate. ibis, lo: Oat purpose. He caul,' not recollect who brought it to the book-binder's, nat. for some time could he recol. legit what became of the original leaves, but at last,- he said, they were burnt or destroyed by himself ; and be swore positively that they contained n.e. •ng more than rezeipts for horse medicines, and some memoranda of the addresses of persons who be spoke medicines, and other trifling entries of Me nature. OW of the creditors having t'-ea pees the book, dee:area he bad n• - es seen it in its oeiginee state, when it contained ell M e.dries rf the Account, and isles, and was regularly posted up at the Slid of every week. After some further examination, in the coarse .1 which the Bankrupt contrail' :tea most of his former statennans, Mr. Watson übrerved, that the amok rapt having so constantly contradreed himself. it would ba with the remelt pain he s!muli proceed in the further examine on, as it w.m1.1 only be en trapping Lim in still more perjury ; he therefore m, on t - - • --_ ;Assisi tiser.erttnisiloner's tft proceedings already befcroinem Mr.,WArren, the Senior Commissioner. f o r himself ; aid brethren, observed, th.it If long as the rupt ,:tended to be examined, end swim red vs,- j tions with appareo! readiness, hc-_,:everkorirradt. r 7 j they might be. the Commission rs would ;eel clrunselves justified in committing him, in al' u they might he obliged to wade throue ,of perjury, they might conic to the truth at lass, wnich . was the great objen. At the same time, he th,ught there were abandact rounds for an indiernent for perjury, w!.ich he strongly recommended. The Absence of Miss Moore, who took so large a part in the Bankrupt's affairs. was so extraordinary, that • nether he, n r the e: her Commissioners could agree • to pass the liinkospt's final examination, 'till she' j should make her appearance. The Binkrupt, he .. observed, could easily find her our, so as to pt./veils the books w th facility, although be denied He knowledge of where she could he found. He ad vised him to bring her forward, and at the same time directed summonses far her to attend the nest. private meeting, on the 18th inst. and a public one on the 19th. Mr. Swinton declared he did not know where to I find Miss Moore, there was a misunderstanding between them, is ti- was the occasion of it. The meeting then a..j surned until the 18111 inn. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. • LEWES RACES—CONTINUED. FRIDAY, AUGUST 1. The County Plate, fir all age. ' the best of three two silo and a half Mate. Its It. IL tits Prince at Wales's Moon. U yrs. old 1 1' Lodi Sect:cites h. li Lies Andrew'. aged Lind Egremont's 4...erimow, 4 )11. oid dr. 4r. Mr. Modiati's Tra.aigar, 3 rt. obi Won eal. A Sweepstakes of 'Pis each, for hooter', rode by gentiedats, one four-mile tie.it Hon. C. Lannorie b. g Bayard, rode by Kr. Dclree . 1 Mr Ilurreirs b. it.lllslldriver, rod • by Mr. Bomb W. burgh's c. h. le:viathaa, agez, rode by the Hum. Mr. • Mackydie. The two tart ran rut of the en urse. HR • Rothe Prince of Wales's Orville, Mt.. againet Sir Jahn Shelly'l Houghton Lass, 710.101 b. 4rn des, .i4bga Had virfeit. Houghton Law paid f.i'teit. The Town Plate of 101 for ail nee, the bed of three two mile and a half heats. 1 l Lord Seek:l6lles h Enchanter, aged . L-rd F. G Othor:l:*g eh h. Su r es:a:win, 5 yrs 2 Mr. hielbsh's hr. li. Norval . dr. 7, Never was there a more inatiapicioos mefrning it rained incessantly ; however, a quarter before one, His Royal Highness the Prince Of We Les arrived on the Course, and the races commenced. 'Mt ground, from the rain. was so extremely slippery. I that many horses i.ll with th-ir riders, tar - we hart ' not heard of any material accident. The Prince of Watts and Party retired to Lewes ; to dinner, after the Sweepstakes. and did not return ' to see the last race, in consequence of the rain. The Ball, at the Star, Last night, was not so full as was eape&ed The Dowager Countess of Cutenes s ta. and Lady A. Pi:C.II4M, the Earl and Countess of CHICHESTER, Viscount and Viscountess G•os, Sir Hcita and Lady Pot a, the Earl of Eoa c wove, G. Cittrui.a r , Esq. and Family, Tiros. W. Pare TiIIOGTON, Esq. and Family, Timis as KCIIP, Esq. and Family, Jous Horst, Esq. and Family. Si Wu. and Lady Rusu, Lady F. Ossoast, Hese SHELL V. Esq. JOllll Futt.aa, Esq. Ge ieral asbi Lady CRAti OTTL LIRNOI, JCIFIII T. P. Minima Esq. Faarrcis NEWSLIT. F.sq. CAlottel Tstomat and T. FISITA THo es 44. Esq. were present. 'Fbe dancing commenced at ten o'clock. At two, above. three hundred pi.tir , ilC sut down to a most excellent supper, after which dancing re-commenced, and th• company did not separate until five this morning. The Theatre was crowded to see Mr. Cosssast i a admirable Comedy of The Heir at Low. Mr. W. PLNL IT was an excellent Pangtou, and Mr. 'ulnas performed Steadfast with hi s usual eacellenee. After the Play, a Nlr. Re •D pretented the sadiron* with Imitations of all the principal male Perform" in both the winter 'Cheat. as, and was en extremely successful, as to be honoured with repeated brews. Thera is strong reason to hope that th • other French frigates, w hich have been commiving dation% in the Greenland Seas en our commerce. , will share the fate of their consort Lc Guerr.ere.— . His MAlrbTs's frigate Le I seas as the Irish station, was ehaced a few d:Ts ago be three: French frigites coming from the northward i Loire, by supei icr saihng, escaped the enemy. and' fell in with the Saper6, of 74 lons, and die APO& fri. gate, and they all immediately joined in pursuit of the enemy off Bel:aisle. The Kiss. has herr pleseed, in considerrion of the distinguishes services of the Right Honnorahln WILLI/kis Earl of NO(11111111. Knight of the Most: Honourable Wintry 0-41er of the Bath, end Rear Admiral of the Rod Squadron of His MAJCSTII . I Fleet, on various important occasions, trod more particularly in the recent glorious and deceive sic. tory off Cape Trafalgar, to grant to him His Rf.yal Licence and Authority to bear certain bonourahis augmenrations to his mood .1 The:r Royal Highoesses toe Dula and Dachas Yost. Duke at Caseation!, the ti k e Aussiao Princes, Dukes of &incase, mid Bott.ann. Mat trines of Lasisoown and Wastassan, Marchi fatless of Larisooivn, Lnrds W.STlteletailtf, STASI KLNIItIbOTOP, Cnt.rsattte, PIICTY. How IC. Cater, CCl:Jfelk. Peruawew,keWeft Ai lb noble per.orages who' 0-9 ml-A the %Talisman Ga tit of the last •reek. As the Rowi-sx Match a ili;s evening (sr several Prte.s given by th spirited Pt apriet ar of the Garden , has been gwrierall esp.riencei as a most iet•vestirg in attr.e3ove 01 canon. the grand Fete afterwards at this popish segue of dronseme.... bid. I.4ir to have as thicogr and fashinn stile at. a:terniance as any it can boa this Si A.V.O• S IttltdAr ' the Loan MAYO. itettel a Precept a Common Had to be held :o• n, now, to choose Shprif, in the room of P E. Mt ta' s, E.q. WI has paid the fine. be ete,nne.ni ti in the office. Asti.:tev SINOLCIOIB Hater% sea+ ridieg Wcdnebdiy se'nnight. in de vicinity of 101..e1 town, rear 1 . )0•11,;. hew•is •of-itonarely flue trot his horse and killed by 'halal. It.hrinn Is l ea in Mai a most pious and roe, itorisasidi 144 i amid the pony of every description a laUfl46lllo start factor 14:4 mi zealous advocate. rft n e w r • eon. "Ixle v 1 r lo x ig f ~C.~v 4 401 OS, •I 4. ct tlkt d a gn bey eat, 110 tr.d Li* t, attar l MtUt