The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-18 00:00:00

• • be for innocence •Wbere there was Such anxiety to iii ' -,ch 1%,, the case, Aid it not he- Ci) tilt t at a crisis 30 importailt, as fathers, as in as Members'of that House, for the sake:. tit the Government, for the sake of the constitute' edatithol•i . ties, for the sake .of the, Princess her , Self; did it not become • theM to stand up and de ciil: either her guilt or her innocence ? Could any pet'son remain unsheeked •by the stories that were' abroas? 'Could the -hiteselt be . wish - ticked' fit'thenh; or' tiny branch of-;'thy:' • fa mily on the. Tiivone Could-,RovallY through- Out:;•F l urope- undrocked .such sto-, riesi•• •Neta7ithstanding the - acquittal of " the Princess by tie,e'who bad examined the charges against)ter;Thotwithstanding her hi.tving visited, and been received by her Royal Father' Undo the la t period Orbit, mental existence, 'there .rvere persons•to whom the Princess might appear sus pected,. though in his : estimation very undeserv adly, v suffering with a part 'of' the h- hoped every small part. He thought it his duty to arrest the progress of such opinions, and prevent any 'further teKposure. In 1795 the • Princess of Brute -will-. mei married to the Prinee of Wales. In twelve months after .she brought forth diet daughter who teas the rightful hope of the country. • There . was uo imputation -then up oh her character: in 179," that is . :in . fifteen months 'after marriage, .the public saw her Se- Tarated from her husband, arid it Wasibut justice • to her to say, that in every thing which the public could learn, there was not the least ground for aecusation. It •'was true the Prince , said that their' tempers did not agree, but from :the period of separatiOn, for a considerable time, • calumny bad not eve;,: breathed upon her. Separated from the fimily to which she belonged by birth, and . in a great measure from that to whit li she was joined by matrimony, left Without a fiiend, .Vithout a protector, without a guide:, a foreigner removed from intercourse with those who might direct and advise her, she yet cOriductO herself up to 1802; jn such 'a inimitee as not to leave room fu r jug the slightest impropeiety. ' He would Ttate what would be the case of n common.person who hatlanarried foreigne6 end who for, very jtiSti,i able reasons had beenseparated from his wife. if 'this Wife,. after • a :separation- of some yeaes, had been guilty of all that with, N. l!lich the PeinCess . of Wales bad,, been charged, mid of all which he sieved her to be itumeen't, and therefore . viShed the. subject to be gone into.; but in the' case of a cohimon persoe, it this Wife, aftee a namiber of years, had been guilty, what would have been • done? If it cooler be-said of the husband, that he tad uhiformly-condueted•biroself with the great telt propriety and decorum, bue had tint during that • time afforded , his proteethei to hie Wife; if under • 6 076 circumstancesl,c accused her of such niis -theds as the Princess !ithi r be ' tn clorgeil with, ire Would be told on carrying the cause into Court; thathe ought to have acted with' a greater degree of caution; tlitet this young foreignee ought'not tar have been so: left to herself ; that the husband ought to have- taken more care. But what was the. cast. of a person in the situation of the Prite 7 . Cets•of• Wales, depri read or the common amhse- • Mentaof life, and Of the - solace . which nnrestrictH intercourse with her child might iitforrl,%---What Was her sititatihn,if that which Lady Douglas had deposed 'was true, for,she had sworn - not only to the statement which she' had repre:iepted the Prin cess to have made to her, and which was inere dile, but to her being pregnant in tht year . lßo2? Why, according to the laws of Englaud, sho must expiate her Offence with her blood. While talking of blood, be would ask . what might . t hit he consequences of t credibility. of Lady Douglas being ,eatablished; 'as, _from her' have • trig recently been examined as a ' witness ,by Ctiltallt ) it seemed was- admitted by the Lord Chancellor% What was . the conic:- , finenee, if that Which she bail deposed were tree., t at the Pfiricei of \Vales had given birth, to a male child i• Why if this were true, the PrineeSs Charlotte-of Wales could have uo•• right to, the Crovva, till it lout been proved that that child Was • trie ofiSpriag of an ,adulterons intercourse.. , Not only the Princess of Wales,,but the• Princess ChM , - lotte of Wales, the Prince Regent, the Throhe, and the Country, were all interested in this ques tion, as Lady Douglas hove came forward and as serted herself to have been caliithniated, at the same time doelariug ner readiness to re-swear what she had lase depo,ed, and that before any tribunal eand if her evideace• was taken in a Court of Jas. , tire' she could not afterwards.be set aside as a, witness not-to be credited. The Princess was ae— etudd,oe, having in the year 1812 been guilty of $ nth improprieties that she became 'pregnant, mid gave birth to a male child . This was swortt to by Lady DoUglas, In 1805 Lady Dpuglai made, this deposition, relating to facts which she, al? leg'eal to have taken place three years before, and w orb, during . all that HMO it td 'kept .8 -aced. ThC 0 . 1 of Wales, bad, at that time, in con , of the representations mXtleto his ftoynl thou ht it riht (aotk no one - could titt h c is omi . &Ict) to wake it comtiodoi coirm on the eatbitet. to his Miije6ty's confidential The Sling waS then 'advised to appoint a t:o a naission to i nqu il o i n to the eOnatict of the Princiesi: -of Wales. , persons namrtd in the C oininisition to einulnr:.t his i t tquir wee Lora skivx, Lord Lilenboroogh, 'Lord Grenville, and Speneer, For the Noble Lord ek , pressed the highest respect, and:thought no, pet'- si ns could have been 'selectecrruore ,competent to t le task, more honourable is med,,more acute as biwyei,s, than the two I:),:iner, mote . ,thstin, gokhed for dispassionate reason and discrintinat tag sense than the two latter. ' In their report they acquitted the PrinceSs of what she was ,charged with by Sir John and Lady Douglas,.,but not wholly of those set forth in ,the •evidenee,, given by persons of the names of Wm, Cole, It. Bid good, ..grtnet.s Lloyd, and its. ;Eti,5114. e deuce of thetif . pe'r3Ons, it was, stated; did not go t t attach cr;tuinality to the Princess 'Ole did , tyt ioiciertit wad to distioetion between erititinality„ sod what - imputed to hcr) 14tit they uccits‘d bet of •wllat, in the sileiety in tiliich We 1 : 11 7 . e; Would, if tr,e, cOnstitute tt great erhrie - on the: tuthoi the- Prhicess of Wales. Ott the I eStirnotty of tyse foAr persinis, rt lticlt w,AS 110 W , XOrks, 411 ct c o w piled L fur toe.' purpos , e of 'tott,tie,og the teikeSS of Wales, the public here: now called upon to`decide on her conduct, He had that -bought a pamphlet which Was, porapoti:ly p forth an published '' by authority, from the giant neniuscripts - Ile had :lewd when . ..buying it, " by what authority it was published, - . and . - was answered, " by Royatuuth,ority: , IL had asked , some further questions, to whieh the had only received evasive, unmeaning ituswers% . --: 'The publication of which he spoke - had a running title, which set forth all with which the Princess had been charged, assuming all to be true, that' every one might proin sentence on the Prin cess of Wales. Ile knew not 'at whosc . instance this was done, 'nor who'paid for it, but he tended it would' have the effect of Misleading many ; and this running title appeared, 'nOtionly in the book, but in front: of the - house, where it was sold, in large diameters.. He moreover oh- - served, that at the end of No. 1. of this,work, there was a - note in ivlLicii it lyas,,obserVed., "1 hit iu t he Appendix. to the - Report of the Connuis sioners; the Depositions of ? Sir. John and .Lady Douglas stood first, but it had been thotight pro `per here to give priority to the other deposi tions, as these alone ..vere• connected , vtith the Itesent cinestion." On the great. charges, the evidence of the perjured witnesses ,was to stand for nothing ;' but in the ev.idence by the four persons he had mentioned, the Public , were called upon drunk or sober tQ decide.— Of these four witnesses, one Wits completely dis credited by the'oaths of respectable witnesses - .-- Frances Lloyd deposed that Dr. Mills had told her, that he believed the Princess of Wales ti) be pregaant. Dr. Mills was examined by a Nolike Earl (whose incredulity on this point he could not , but lament) and he positively swore that lie had' said no such thing, upon which Frances Lloyd was, again examined, and she ' , then thought that she might have made a mistake, (having sworn that Dr; Mills had,said he believed the Princess was 'pregnant, She,might haVe .made a ll mistake !) and she then 'swears it must. be his partner, Mr. Ed- , !facades, who told lierso.- Mr. Edrocades, on this, was,Sent for, who also swore he had' not sstid'any thing of the kind.Bitth,these Gentlemen had repel led the chur,se with it degree of spirit which did them infinite honour; and satire nOt only that they . had never used such words, but that they never had suspected the princess to be pregnant, and: that they.had always treated tire story altoglether as the infamous lie of the day. Ile . ,felt. ,surprised .that the evidence of Lloyd, so disproved., should still he regarded as entitled to any attention. There was abother evidence which had made a gre,at impression ou the pub is mind; and be hoped '..hat he should hurt the :eelings of no one by referring:to it,'as he felt it his duty to do so:— The House would anticipate I .c s. meant, the 'evi-. deneeof Mrs, Lisle. This witness, who was au lady of high rank and character, had been about the Princess of-Wales from the 'time of her ~first: ,airival in Enimid. down to—and he wished the lion! -- ,e to Mark this—down to ;lie latter end o f f the year 1812, during the whole of which time, tho' -riot greatly in the confidence Of tint Princess, she had been toast...ltaly about her, 'From , 'flut (icon sitlon.of Mrs: Lisle, an inference lad beers drawn which ought nOt. to be drawn from it, acid he was only surprised; not that Mr's.. Lisle had signed this'• deposition, but that such a deposition 'had beets drawn up for her to sign. A Gentleman on that •morning had Coomniiiieated to him the exalt - dints : tion of Mrs , , I4isk lie 5 , 1 r. ,knew 'not hoW it was procured,. that NhS not for. him to„ inquire, but he had been assured that it was correct, and had been requested to,cimtrast it with the depo- Sidon of Mrs. ,Lisle. Every person knew that Mrs... Lisle, it the time. he Was. brought for Nerd on this ores:Nit:in, was a person , it‘tfering under a a great family I,4llietion, and was so inuchdistress- • ed in her mind, .when called upon, that he had no doubt, had it not oppem et! to tin Comm; zlion'that datyhaperiously required them to proot;tvl without delay, they would have postponed .the examina tion of Mrs, Lisle. I e wished to explain her de positiim, and in this case it Was inoSi desirable that the public should pause belbre they decided on the character it hi; cc. On this-he vvislied , the public AO, suape id their judgment till the :moment arrived at which they could properly decide. He thenproceedeth to contrast the depositions with the exaniinations, The part to which he parti ctilarly referred, was that where it was stated that the Princess appeared to take greater pleasure iii talking to Captain Maltby than to her ladies. She beim% ed to him only' as any Woman who likes flirt ing Sh,e. `,IIO Old not has c thought any married 'woman ~ x oniti haVe behaved prbperly who shOuld have beliaricit as her Royal llighness did' to Capt. 'Manhy. l cannot say whether Site was attached to Captain Manhy, only , that 'it was a flirting conduct. Never saw stay gailautrieS, as •kisS= ing bey' timed, or the like. It then went: on to Speak of Mr. Cilester, Mr.' t [hod, AC: 'The evidence given by -Mrs. Lisle did rot, stypnrc thedeposition. lle icis not Stir prised to find .her name to it,, afflicted as she Was' at that 'particular thee, he could easily cor,oive intibrrectness„ when it toilet'. might . escape .her oh ,scrWatjoni but be Was quite surprised to find that feinting questions Intil been put to' tier by the Lord Chancellor- (Loyd Erskine) such ns' be would haves, expired rather than have stifiered them to be pint iit a Court of justice to a witness in the box, by the party opposed to him in any cause which he might have bad to conduct, One might suppoSe front' the deposition, that - -all it contaitted came- twat - Mrs. Li as what she Firth:ill:* noticed.' It might, he thou . Oit Whitt site deposed crime spontaneously trout her but lon the; contrary, it was obtained with difficulty and did not bear that charamter which at first appeared to , belong to it. was asked.---Q. Did Cantaiti ~smelly usually sit next the Prineess tit Watts at dinner A. He did. Nr3s ndthing rettlailiabil this, :When it was knOwn how.the stattaii ,. .,:at had been nuitle . , but frOlll reading the depositious it 'might, seem that there was something out of the contittim wa,y, in it, which Mrs . . Lisle had ntiticed its.sindh, Th e Lord Cintncellor (Lord . Ei'skiiie) then asked,- Onestion , Mrs. Lisle, can yon say you were all sitting there just its we Are at present. This isa.s' really ludicrous. How %vas Mrs, Lisle,. to'answer such 'a wiestion, Whieh require! her to state, whether at the Princess's they intd all been seated e ti:ac t ,sr. as the. (....:OnnifissionerS 'tad Mrs. ~ care; then at the table is As then asked as to the conversation 'Which took plate. The arii . Wert was, the she '!Auto Sly it Waz Would Lord &Able IliVe: . sitircri,ql such questions to he put in a Court cif Justice Lisle era:' then ztriketl;"" Q. Wlnit, tii'e-PLincess" !and. Copt., Manby sat apart. - ?-••-=A. They did.' Tie begged 'the House to attend to the next notable , qUestion---"' What \do you suppO4e they talked about ?"--Re would asE, was it fair that such questions 'should beput :lhe answer to the last - question was--A, '' did not listen to their con versation."---After this•the following 41v6Stion was. put to her in these terms. Q. " answer ine.as.a . Wowan of reason, character and the world,, can you say before Cod and this COrn mittee, that the conduct of the rrincess,was such as was proper 'for a married wCintan - l . He was sorry to dwell on - this. subject,'.but• . ,this was a question wb pht town evidence in the.situatitin it►‘vhich Mrs: L. stood at that time, roust make: every-chord of, ,tier heart vibrate. e did not doubt but it was with anguish and difficulty that she bad been able to give an answer. Her answer, which was given with much collected dignity,spoke the feeling of her • heart... A: "-My Lord,. my daughter lived well with her husband. - The question was repeated by the Lord Chancellor, ." Whether the conduct- of the Princ:..ss was that - ,which beecame a marfied woman, with respect t.O ber'coruhret to Captain :Hanby Loyd borough then " I suppose you put the ques tion, whether line -conduct was such as became any married . 4 - ornan ?" To thisquestion, no an swer. was given:- When asked- what she had thought of the .flirting of the Princess v she bad answered that she thought her conduct improper. He was sorry, .for the cause of justice, that this inquiry had - been so conducted.. Mrs. Lisle. was then asked----`"Q. But, Mrs.'Lisle, did:you never think what could be the reason of tilt!: Princess's preferring the Conversation of Captain Manby." A. She war; &W Ays free and condescending to every !May."' ," Q. That was not My question.. You say,' e Princess preferred the conversation of Capt. ThiS was admitted by Mrs Lisle, and it WaS not unlikely that-sothething breaking in on Royalty, or radar the mock . Royalty, 'should Make the Princess prefer the conversation'.of a gentleman who Was .new to her, . to that uf her ladies.----Y.ct for this an imputation was cast on her oharacter. Let them loop at home, those ,who had wives and .daughters,..and let those who had not, took at their sisters, ant! say, whether, if such imputations were broUght loimvurd' against them they . vould not repel them with scorn, or prosecute those with Whom they ori4inated. .The - examimAtion' then pioceeded, and trout Captain Manby they , 'went to Mr. Hood,' and the following important gullies were made Dia the Princess ride out with Mr. Hood Q. in what carriage ? Did Mr. hood drive Whose servant attended , limn'?" and . the .answer to this last •ques,tion was "Mr. Hood's servant." Th44n canto this notable ~c.inestiOn—" Was Mr, I-leod's servant ,a mica or a boy 'i" For What pin-pose could these . questions • ;be: put, and 'was- it fair *ti 3t a viitne,ss should ,he thin interrogated'? He glow came to that part of Abe deposition Vi hiidi spoke - ,0f. , '..V.fr.... Cheste'r, the Princess - having been taken -from ,Capt. Munuby to Mr. -Hood mud front Al-. Hood. to i\ir.,-Chertter. • INlrs. Li Pc was represented to have said, that Mr. Chester 4 as ft pretty man.„ ~T,he inferenee at tempted to be drawn from this.waS , too. ludicrous, to lit, serious, if it were not unhappily .too,serhans to ,be Indierous. Mrs. Lisle w:1, asked, " Mr. Chester is a Very bandSotne Man, is he not 7 ...'!.. The all6Wcr given was,;" He is a .very pretty man. - - It ‘vas disgusting to go oil with The o:aiu,illatious, but he felt it tti be mecesiary. The Lord Chan cellor asked *Mrs.Lisle the following quiestiOn, " Have ypu any recoll:.Ttion of the. PrineeSs get !hut up in the night, and going into ivuther room , 16t` her tic ht ?; 'Mrs. LiSle said, ',I have. .Ad to ,the question, a fine. - que , niou. to .bc put ,luy' two lawyer,: ! ‘, Why did the Prince.o.; . get, np in the nigla i" The answer Was, '4 I. heard her Royal Highness sw!„ , she was ill; • soil- that her own light going'tint,, She re,lighted her candle. •in the ser-,, vaut,'s room." . :This, as stated in. the exlumina tion, wore - quite a different complexion from that 'which it had in the deposition. . Was it' lint .cicar that ,the . Priltet;SS, like every other' person, was . likely to be ill ; • and was there, in,- fairness, . the. ' ,slightest scintilla of guilt to be inferred 'from this answer ? They no w came - to Captain . 11 atire.; trot Coitent with. Captain ManhY, Mr. I-, i'uod,. and. Mr. Chester, Captain Moore must be, brought io. Here 'it was' asked.---Lbiti- he dine there i. Ile did' And ~subsequently, was she (Mrs.. Lido) in the room at the time he, Captain Moore, W:IS Wit() the Princess ? The answer was no ;,,Ise had left the room twice. How long- was she abSeilt, was then asked. This, he thought, seem .ed like 'throwing an imputationpu Mrs. Lisle, atilt' She heir g aware`of . something wrong; had •gone . purposely out of the way. : She „stated het , - - • •" ;eft' to. have been 'tibsent: hid an !tout out of the toom and. this she ,ueeotthtect , for natur ally, enough, by' statinff, that she had been 'looking-for a volume to Complete a Set of books, Willa the :Princess 'was abOut• to lend to . Cap tain Wore.. She further stated, that the Prin cess had•given him an inklhorn ; And when asked hoW hitehe,stayed, she atiswer.ed that 'he Went before the tadies.' elute Ir. • Law rence ; but he thought he , had gone, far enough With this. 'Let the notes be examined corn-•• • pai'ed with the depsition, and the former corn ph ely took the sting out of the °hitter. Of, the four witnesses then, Frances,Lloyd Was proved to. have perjured her,ell; the evidence of tfrs. Lisle proved pothingAgi l idq, Itr, anc} the evidende of Cole, and BidgOod must he Subsuintiatedhefore he could sligistOst‘ inwutation nu ht to be east on the conduct octhe Pt incess. .I:Tie then de -scribed her Fe , ;crit situac'on. She lu. , ;(1 .he , n eleven year.i under this persecution-; hip c::11 ~ d it pei!secntion, for' if she were guiltv, ttfose Who it in their pOwer to, make cowl the Cbarge.. s pre ferretlinpunst her, did a t justice to ,Let nor,t6 the. Country in withholding them so .long. She had, during the period he had ritentioued, been , the situations delerihed in lie f letter, e x posed to charges -of . friends turned enemie3 , --of servants -who seemed traitor:: 'and- 'bpiraey, of s.>e ha anti dorne9tie treason ; she could -look to 11 ,- • security f o r he r ;l, - ~:tour', but to the 'PriaciPle of justice which reonstwlttyacttikelthe conduct hii.Maj'es!v. All 'the 'talent of the land had been combined to itiquirejnto her e.'.nt- . . tt, , attJ 'site,iimi be,,:ii bikeii hy sarpris! with an t idri-er; . Old . haa only been' sestainei by bet Own native Colliag,Ni-bic,ii he tirally lieliev.:(l,4, -only be s-upported by conscious l,1:loccil He then took a .view of the sit aitioa in 4ic ll WI Charlotte.PrincesS . She 1; act st t) ofl had hail.r ith , .t . n ep i e n u t t ii t n ( i ' i t: o ' e r, t i ' t r an ci i charge had been given .by the King' , tnu l ' lesl iii declaration in writing, that . it was his lloYA''.l,`.; and pleasure, that'the Pr.:aces-1 giarleite P,..1!,19: not be eonfitmed till-She had coniletea lieregv.: i c n i c i a c i t t i t i g i e t i l k:l . te t ' l i . : iii r it t . i : ::::,rl,le!t!,!al;6aidsli';'o,ll3i;l:'-il.sf'erecti.natcecile.t:'''!itYPi ' 1 and. 1807, during' the whole p l e B t tl i( 4 )d ) oirlii - ;;,.. - i',. ::, tigation, and subseqifently tlowil to ISlt Y i ° . (l , restriction was given. - . .-4hopt th.it ,five" r .: hints had been_thrown. ( j u t o n . .tlu! su,bitt . t.t.,, ^str;ezions,_ am! - these were conialcted- iifilleiTn: autumn. A letter writteii on tl,e :;tibio t i g i, Billet!" Regent, had been twiee reurne,,,i4; ortelled , ,and-at last returned with the „coy, austere answer, the' Pribce Ri!..,,elit'layi I:ifri., 111 '. 1U to give on the - sabjcct. ' "rh'is ffl ' i ,tAt . c i llll e l t il . t e ils il t l i , t s l : : . ll4l l i.s. ' i t t l h: : ' ; 'l l l e ttil a ‘:t : i '7 , et e llt : ''e s : C f ) i . (;'. ii: i a lbi t rn .ii i. 'l lit gi. t si e ti r ligeiebii'i: i iz e:a t i ds : object i( i ) .( l ) l l.;o b e u r t iy t , o s , . e fi l i l e t a t ( . l7' ) l i t e l i i . c s' :( 1 ) ,: f i ' n ti g le , , 1 ?; e .' t1it , ,i ,4 4 .lect, autl. :from being - the tulvisza. °l,:,,..iitti pasf;.ages ill that letter, .- which h ,..;,',A.-- ; by Mr. Pereeval; :he ceitainly .sliutilj'i":tdril The Noble Lord (Lord, Qirstlercii,l l4 ‘ , ll 'o' . i , y..c - ii ln'a former debate, that.the letter of 1 "‘ 4 , 0 0,71,e' was returned-in consequence of a priv' e i.",a 40 11 went, which, it was very well knovoi " t o, b Made when the Prince - and ...Princess Seetli.,lo6l the Prince was' 't:oettittlievdiseill.isti,t his Itor' ,l , j t ti,Pe should hold no intei.cotirse with her, A t 4 0 , 01110. _of a private Gentleman, tindielii.stlilieecsiaslit°cltil)..iYl:" King. .Thea , if aciy thing improper wel l : j ' ec bii eil with the.Prinee6s.Cha'aotte , wit° " ls ( i ) iiiit l ' of the State, the King cOuld i n t e rfere , 01 05 1 . 4. J the reins ot-Gbyerinutnit, - , he w as . surr i ,"`,,O od a that a ,priv4eat'rangement was to stand', ~A 1 a% t .r.'i % l e i, i .i si i i , ° l c e , i n ti r t i l : te n e s 4 '°' C ii rs e ete s t 're s dt l 'i t i r i ) f it f . o lel iwis s l t . :9l l : ll : Pu i et v i a ''''lt s 'l : l l .::ll ) ll e llteldieliis::teilbill:bere:ll:l.ol: ; lll'-iel! which - ever ystiblect had, that of Pe titi° ; ll . l r 0 1 ' Sovereign. l'here,vast - no. offence i°;.',:,,,51,, publication of that. letter which call e.. " -e fftb ' ceedlngs to be set on foot. On the I' 2 ° y i e IS t i) i t i . : le r a y . t s ,t ( b ti u l a i i d: to . i t l a t k l w t e e n : s t eB2'-:SeeiX:11:1:::111bril°111111CCISIIC:ICee.:(111lie):114i:1:1C11: el:1:11(ri.31;if::i.j;.:::15:(1t: C 1, : s k ),( 1 11 0:: b ( i ) e f ::: e t s b e ie, ii ix el l e t ) t e :ll nati o it i ? f ie v i, e- teli c;, Noblet,. Lord (Caatlereugh), did. no t,.. but ".,,,, 1 ' r d ~ out 'his knowledge. ' l i .. 'a i ) - gn : d3 lN litiThe : l l ..C.:::l : ti° : ll:7*-'11:1 1 'r I ii It, ~. (1 ) e t e .', if critninAlitr had been traced ° ~- „ l 'i frito. eels'; her intercourse with lter:deililtte!''it_ollit'. been intertiketedeltegt - ;ther. ..11ThYq, b ,%, " ' 1 14e ' it was ele?..r there was no erimitunit,ootir saht ; if t h.: Princess bad. not been s ° ,,', ll , l e * te ..-'' the r;:. , !trictious which ha.tl-been.thoug," cot, v° 111 ( 1 only. have litste.4 tilt the' Princeis ~,„ C3llle to town. .Why, if, so,. the P r iti t ri Ho r t ,?, ), 1 1 have b e e n soothed, by au answer statill,.)eip' !„ta,,iiing'"lsO what tad liesit.the %visli,..° .ll .oq - the . ' spirit 'l p ° l .l l l i i cl ll ;tE r i ;e l ( ru t:i f ti : tn ( o Pe l s i t n eet ll tit t l ; i t t l i (l l °l e t srt i l o l.' e l n eel ; en . y . :l°tl s ni' l - - :g e t:;:g'bsl::ritel:ieliililtsleii illtia.ti:C7:l ' :t: crtncess appea ' red t , , kiln . actuate(' by . 4 0' ).C"t. °ettoian, and he had , hoped the lftbos,V ueen.arrived‘vltetithese differences foil.S"en ft the result of what passeltile.iinr‘'ktliffirl4.°s2::es,,,,(l°l:cttliltic:i put at rest fpr ,exer. _ Ile . bad . vv t l itr r, Which he bad thought,: sent 'from ' the the Prince; ini lit -.insure a 166(110300. I, House ti4iiik. l i e trespassed t o o ulna) ( n ) . ' if he read the substance of t hat tel r. read ,i the letter,. Which Was n eorly in ( i II I once ino,te am 'encouraged t° li t i ' lt ps: l l l%,le% v l ll,cllti i: jett l tigi : l l ;iii. a y , ilit t i i • iti l e tiiide ... so t i 4 ,,..i : is l :stt i ci, it g :i i)i s tinejittcy:iti,)Lli,ietititel,td:::::t.s.t,''i9iei.x,i:a.ner:cei_rfo,lsj;iyrpl:'i-t't.‘njit'bbi:taeeleteeilb:NcNil.:sttlier:i'otititi,el(itriljik):itf,'iin:bS:iste:st.":):'i.r;),lCij,bu':eitl:_ite,,t,idtleibtieliil:') ie Wrlidi, after..nOficingthe receiPt of tit .e' ; ',l - 1 mans. ' The •.- ItUra Chancellor lo t a 1. ,`,. c , letter ; - but the .Spertker of the, 1 1 °. il ii i i t t °ions had announced to the Hou se ' t received*, and -read it, toltor.grF" lirplace,--chicleuence Of this, certai n p r' ' „ l" taken place, - -liplace, - -chiclebad terininated acquittal., It went on, c` Al , 1 "., e 4 ittlaress•yott, ;relieved front a 10a° u / i le ti confident in my .innootince, n° w " t been. publicly acquitted, and a ill,O r ' tingilished title d : hear. The liing:l`l, &Ire sacred, and I ain satisfied ircie°i, .catisc why the confirmation of "IY.,, i i , been tielityo. To the r estrietioo tlionght necessary. in my intereti"lile submit ; but I throw myself ,on . your Ila,yal Highness not to ahritl4tl is nceessiiry, tily.greatcst,. ( . 10 , my nay ph' of being with the i'riffeess . Char t i Royal flightless May be sssiired, ilia ..v Of her society is lett to rne; I shall , t Inlvf: been, ' most careftil to 'f t ` k°-'v ii able. I will not trespass longer' at ' ~ Highness, but in the tiapPY fe.°l i " g I t o imcv'nee, I retnain, &e. This le.tr eT ,i i t , ed. eagerly; at the time the ti‘n;:',liie tit l ls, - .l : e : " ti i e h !: a i i rk„ l ' a g ji. i to tt ei c :l e )ip Di b e e ttt, e ili ti i,:i a v - : , s i t it .iiii t , e ili t ii.i l .r. t o tt l! :os t ii11e1. :: : : ,0_,. to setid :if to the PO nee Itege'at? . 1 1 ,0.. ts 34 . ' • t ;:. a tlit ► 'I, by the Lord Chancellor, ‘l ll ° 3 T i eto.- - him .to be a.credilile WitnesA, ,‘'•'..l,'-;., tllis,. 'and of the effot'tit: 1.1141.. ~..2 . 0 .4 ,. eititlenceat I)over,anit.othe..,i. ii,:t.a"4ll, eel ! t er --design., H e b a d tltol,i,.diks, might - have. been at i0 .. ,,et. ,,,,1 ) '- j ,ir 1. , rttiq l -0; the- P.rillcess':iiiiglif, .41. 1 .ve -;--, i i gt4 j ! ' tioti 2 ' IOW IV -.t.IS C01111i111:Cti•.1"' .: - if 11P . d . O font . ti l sl . ll..rself .ntit. :16:01.c!,-io* o rft Of i v iito' ty of-tvriting this .. faits' Ilc oreliol'' aria pilt. it to the lins': fot o it might not have .beep lloPe`a le lip- 4 1:4 -, 1 lo• Ilt V lett ( i g 0 t ) 1 1 oc r ' s ii ' e I , 00 1 ~ I‘ , i leolil i thf" i : Cer ?• ,', i'l to II m i eii . / ei 618t .;,.4tii be , .'tli t' ll af t4 ' I or t bor t 1 1 d t!I P ' r e t i ts t o 0- 1 ~ , , 10 it Q''' ot . i it ,li'e3'' o o f( lui, o d' 1 i r ut , - „ i 41 wise f' ~ i; t t ho ' , ie i 5 lll ' , i t Sl'‘ t , i ai 1., , , i 'CO' her r eir , ill " I I 'at . 1 `iii; .' 1 kl" , ) 111f octli) ,i - ` ' -' , ‘ i o 'c' il: 3 i9:l l 'l l l , : l c' : l 4 l4 ; ' d,it v l i, whi ch ' If CSC . I 01 11 , I tre, - iii otteit 1 , if I et ? ' It 0. ) ' ll i be./ ei ''-' t 11 /1 a ..oi it t, Y a ie J 4' I 0 1i 04 .1 51 , ,,,/ , , kt 1 v v i ~•,,, hc ij i 3 : 4., , ztr, 4/ t AO," be 1 j iPs it • V, JO ,- e 1 i f • ~11i, i 1 it - - • prr ill h tell f,j i!, 05 I , jitTe r i r (! ih" frrt 1 ii-ll' l teol q ,i ,t;0; ; I; ; :, r .fr.=',:- t re;' , 11 x Y , 'v( 4 6 1, A . re, -"' I, filth ` ce ' • I‘ , ' ,