The Sun. — London, England, 1813-07-17 00:00:00

done; anil goOds sold and delivered, on account of the defendant. c ~,eivEy-GENEuAI... said, it was' rather in the city of Wi•NtUlin:.tcr, -he should have to ask, who were the IVii , u , bers 14 the city at Westtitinster fot th: t was literally the questioll whic.ii his Lord ship und the jury had to try. ' lit any other place in the country, uny person would have no hesita tion in saying; that Lord Cochrane and Sir' F. Burdett were the Representatives - fir Westwin ster; unless, indeed, they chose to reverse. the frames, .and say', Sir P. litirdetrand Lard Coch rane. Ihe demand this cash for 225/. being - a moiety. of 450/. the whole suni charged .to the Candidates for expense-of hustings and other necessary things, at the election for Members of P-ir{lament for Westminster . , although not near the amount of the expense which .the plaintiff ' had iecurred. Ily en Act formerly passed, the candidates at county elections were made liable to pay to the Sheriff the necessoy expences of the election ; this Act had been lately extended to West minster. Who hut the candidates Might to pay the expellees ? BeSides the expellee of the hustings, it was, necessary,to employ 26 poll clerks ; and would it be just and proper that the' expellee 'should fall on the litigh Rdiiiff, and he could not 'levy the Innottot on the electors ? it would pro bably be said, that the defendant in this case was not a candidate ; he hint great respect for the Can didates, alchongh he had not the good fortune to to bare: Often agreed with them, and not at ail latterly ; indeed, on several great occasions they were chummed one to the other, and had no other person to ugree with them ; but, however, they mast pay. •Ilere, then, WgiS R purity that belonged to no other place ; all was love, all was purity ; such was the purity that the member must not be.a candidate. There was, however, a good axiom in law, that he who does a thing by another, is to. be considered as having done it himself. If there was a good active Committee, 'and a strong-headed Chairman, there could not be touch difficulty in saying who were the candidates. 'There was an old custom. that every Member, on taking his math at the table of the Howe, should pay two ; and he was then congratulated by the Speaker oa taking his seat. To such an ex tent. WUS purity curried, that in ,order that the Meniber might be able to say he was returned free of experiee, Sir Francis _Burdett was waited upon in grand procession' and had two shil lings deliveredrtabim to lay upon the table'. He wished that such purity was carried all over the country ; for byithe should have saved four shil lings, the fees he bud paid during this Session 'of Parliament, on having twice taken his seat. The best friends would sometimes differ, and a very ' statmelt patriot had threatened an opposition, and every body expected a strong poll. After the can dictates are nominated, and a poll demanded, the Bailiff only adjourns for two hours, to pre pare the books. If a contest should be expected, it was necessary for the High Bailiff to prepare the hustings and poll-books before-hand ; and .unless the hustings were erected at a considerable expense, anti of great solidity, ~persons would be very .onwilling to tart their lives upon it, in the contest every persen knew it had to sustain, dur ing the fifteendays. The High Bailiff deserved greatcredit, not oqly from the candidates, but from the country, fur having put an end to that scene of riot, which was known to have always arisen at the election for the city of Westminster. Before the Candidates had returned their thanks, !:. , 'fore the election was ended, the mob rushed forward, kind, at the hazard of their lives, draged the bustings.,,which they claimed as their per dikite ; this the.plaintilf had prevented, by ealhug irr the assistance of a great number of peace, of ficers, The Cientlernao who acted for the plaintiff thonght ho•had nothing to do but to ask, the Can didates for thesoloant : he, however, was obliged to bring two actions. Lord Cochraue suffered oilgumut by default ; andayou a writ of inquiry,lie examined.must minutely all the charges. He sapposed that the Honourable Martinet, itt conse queare of o ,rae agreemeut with his constituents, found himself under the,,rlecessity of not yielding until lie• had retired to the last ditch. The jury 'had only to decide, whether the defendant' wa.s odidate. ble had, MI a former ueclugou, the ibis:tests of „the present detimdant entrusted to •ale merely , pronounced the very words of his in structions, but he made, no way in persuading his Lordship and the Jury. Mr. Morris was admitted to be the High Bai liff of Wesiuinster. Mr.Ontp:ion, Clerk to Devon and Took, produced office copies of tlic precept and return u` ttie igeotion of Members of Parliament for Westminster. I'tlr. Whetham, Clerk of the Journals and PI- Teri, produced the .test-roll, and swore that the Haute of Sir F. Thirdett was written under the ,name of Westminster. Air. Took, Deputy to plaintiff during the last ilectiuni swore that the proclamation was in in the usual manner : the precept %VHS thittd evt ember 1812 ; the day of election oral : 11 , 0 Hth of Octob er , a t tl ic 'hun t place. Alt...hirm dis; jun. called on him, and made ensptiry as to the cloy tin which the day of election should IA c place. Ile was the sou of 'Mr. Brooks, of the Strand, Chairman of the Westininster Election Connuittee—(Lord ELLEtoottooon—" I know nothing - of the Committee,")--the usual hustings were built, and poll-clerks .were retained, poll books and the i.ecessary.stationery were procured contest was ex pected by him in particular. It was necessary to make preparations beforehand, as, by the general Act, the !lig') Bailiff, could not adjourn for a longer period than the next day. It was the custom in Westminster for the High Bailiff after uolnination, and poll •demanded, to adjourn for two ttr,urs, in order to swear in the poll-clerks, and ur rangq them. in their [,lures. ,T.l 1 e carpenter comp that the seven or 'eitiht -i days . usually allowed net Ntflicient, and that, he - 'g I.e;d to ());,,,ecre oriel and sii. byo n T e !i t 'll t l : v ;h i e ' election Cochrane. were , oleo T c n i . 0 -1: tt and L or d withdrew on, the mornin g o f tli, !e i e , ) ,, r tt " e "4 "- tierrieri olYercd theiwelyes u a d vers , nient , , r ` l vho u had Sheri if took evei'y precau n tio t o fr i .„ 4 , the lit , . li g 4 ,and surceecied, (Lord ELLENBOIMFGH- Thset:ltligt;:: Lion only . suppo3e; as to whether delen i daut he liethle to any thing, trot as to th e amount ?) I The 4-6w:a colpl.oyed ; , .11..lanviih: Ca' verve , and Mr. Inwood t9...31,11 , :ey. Lord EILLTINDOIkOUO;I.----lqr. BrOlyl!aill, derstaml th v at oa do, Hut dis'ptite the aalociSs., that the only vet:tion 6 whether delemdaut at all Mr.' Blow Gil ANI.—It is tilt ovly queey . sm. Tool:, on cross-examinittioa, swore, ti.ot he did not see Sir V. Burdett dorir:.-4 the, whole time.. Mr. ~ArioittilLY-GENLIIAL said, that was his case. _Mr. Bizonotuact submitted, , that the plaintiff must he nohsuited. It had.notheen proved that the deletaant Was a candi‘!ate: Lord r. UMW did !mt see that they had "t' •ty - 1 • - - •- 1 t provr4 su...uneut.y v‘as necessary he should: at feast be assent lug, that he should b e th e ohjeet of voting for at the election. The Arror.NEY-6ritAt. said, that would go to at great.exCent ;. if a person were sick, and not able to attend,. he would not be liable. for the expellees. Lord ELLENannoup,H.—if his agent does it, it isthe saute as it he did 'tiniscli . The ATTliftNEy-GEN - 4RAI, cited the case of the saute parties in 1 camPbell; 218, as deeic;ing the - Lord ELL UN /40110 ii Git did not distinctly reCol lect that ease, but he thought he had left the question of agency to the Jury : but in this case there• was no connection proved between the de fendant and the son of the Chairman of the Cont-• mittee. • The . ATTORNEV-GYNERAT, COOtendetl, that by taking his seat, the defendant had talopted the acts of the persons who had acted in his favour, and niade hi:ll:self liable to the expenses. Lord ELIA NnoitouGusaidi he would reserve the point, ‘rticther by taking his seat; which seat be was obliged to frtite, 116 was then to be con sidered as a candidate, and liable to the e•xpenses ? Suppose a person abroad, t:leeted without his knowledge, was be to be inaealiable for the ex penses ? By candidate he understOf:l a person who solicits votes, but in this case 'it 411:1 not appear that Sir F.'Burdett took any part. The ATTORNWV-GENERAL said, he believed: there was an instance. of alslonher never takint his seat. Lord ELLENBOROUGII.—In case of a cill lie would he obliged !.(-) mteod. The ATTOI=Y-GENERAL Said, that in order to avoid a call, he had delayed his scat for two or arce days: - • _ _ Lord ELLvt.sottouon could not take notice of the emtnnis of Parliament, but by the word Candidate he understood a person ,who offer ed himself as an Object to be voted for. Mr. Took was again called,lic swore that he waited on Committee. Lord Et-LENRonou.on.--"Vou must connect de fendant with the Comtnittee. Took.- . --Tbe members vi , ere pearly the•same as the members of the former Committee. LOVIELLENBOROUGIio----That will riot di) ; God forbid there should bc a continuation of the pro ceedings ,from election to election, • Mr. Took was proceeding to state, that Inc bad given tickets to the Chairman of the Committee to admit Sir 1?. Burdett's friends. Lord Eti.Exaoßoucii.---It canfiot be received. What is the Chairman to the Court, oniess you connect him with the defendant l: . The ATTORNEY GENERAL said tie would call 'Mr; Brooks. _At r. Brooks was called. Mr. litiouGuAM objected . , tba c t he wouid . ,:bave gone to the jury wheu the Attorney Oenerul closed lis ease, had lie thoirgltt the litturney-tieueral Ivould have called more witnesses. • Lord ELLENnonou(in thought he could not al low the plc;i►till to call farther evidence, and,di reeted tl►e plaintiff to be nons4ited , With leave for the defendant to move to set aide the non suit, and enter a verdict for the 225/. his Lord ship'theti said, that there might be sonie stances attending his taking his seat, Which niit;ht hiu► to the expences 3 but the ground on which lie had nonsuitcd the plaintiff Was, that t h e naked fact of taking his seat dia not make the defendant liable. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JuGY, 16. :SITTINGS sEroaz JI 7 STICE ASP A SPECIAL J V 11Y. DUNBAR V. lUTCEICOCK. This action was brought byibe plaintiff', a Lieutenant in the London Ali against Major liitcheock of the same , regiment, to recover damages for false itupriSonment. It appeared from the evidence; that on the 24th of October last, the (Akers of the reginient dined *together at the Ship Tavern, Greenwich. ,The defendant took the chair, and they . had nuvit conviviality. They had been drinking together aix or seven hours before any thingpartiettlarhappened. At near eleven o'clock,. a dispute occurred between Danbar and another oilitera the name of Shaftoe, in which the defeMboW threatened Mr. Dunbar with an tr,:rest said;'Mr. Dunbar, I desire y - oft will hold your toofoire„ or pit the room, A'Tr, D— . said, l olv6t,::Aktienoil trotted Croft tin suug.a song; ;t'iter whieh rose to addresis President, wht; tarid, bar, if you say any thing More, it is my otder, that you consider yourself . tinder im arrest, and go 16 quarter*. Mr . . Dunliar then' abused the Major, .called him'a scoundrel and a coward, a nd said, it he Wonld meet him the :next day. Re would give biM two' shots' for OUC. —lie was going out at the dmir, and the:de fendant cxelnimed,—Stop, Sir, yon shall not gO. without a file of men. The gentlemen present then got up; turned Mr. Dunbar out, and n . - co veved him to nu adjoining room, where lie was placed till the file Of men sbOuld arrive, but before the-latter came, be leaped out of the ,window, and went to town: The file:of soldiers' went throngh Greeniriell in search. 7of him, but co n t i t t l i t t l .n . i n_ot , , n t: e f next morning he course, find a g s as i ' l e e l l i l i f m ld s -g el o i n t e ip t t o o i tlie coin.tuand ing officer, and was put , under close arrest. lie continued a prisaner front the 25th of October till the 23d of January, during which he was tried by a Court Martial, and by sentence suipended , from ra,ok. and pay for:twelve months. For the inipri sonment which the plaintiff - considered ilie%all, he brought his action, anti it vas contended that be was eatitleti to lame darnafres. All the 'witnesses ahaitted that the conduct of the plaintil era , ey.- treacty indecOitons at- the dinner. col. Sir C S. :3anler said particidait- thaChe - Co - risrde`redM! . .. Do . nhar's Oifcrice, a military point of view,. so had, that he could not consent to enlarge his ar re,t when applied to for that t ,purpose. Mr. Serjeant LENS, for the defendant, la mented that the plaintiff 'had brotht. the action, because it,would doubtless add to the unfavour able impre.ssiOn made by his present eouduct. The Learned Set: east then produced the Military :Zr ticks-o;' War, atid contended that the defendant was hound by the .20th article to do as he had done. It he had not put the plaintiff ! under ar rekfor intleeent, mutintrus langungc, he would- have been unworthy -tine character of an . oaicer and a Gentleman. The Learned Junge e left the Jury to decide whe ther the plaintiff, by his behaviour,' bad given the defendant a right to e).atitie him. If they thought he had, then they would find a verdict for Major Hitchcock. His Lordship expressed sonic regret that Subb an action had been brought into a Court of Justice, as it could only tend to expose to the world matters of insubordination, which the Le gislature had Wisely confided to the judgment of a Court-martial. The Jury, without the least hesitation, found a verdict for the defendant. Mr. Dunbar' asked the .indge, after the trial, whether he might indict the parties for a con spiracy to injure him by their conduct ? Sir J. MANSFIELD Mid, in answer, that if plain tiff took his advice, he would have no more to do with law. COXSISTORY COURT, DOCTORS' CONLMONS, JULY 16. WARING V. WARING. This was a cause of divorce, or separation, pro moted by Mary Ann Waring, the wife, against James Waring, Esq. r her husband, by reason of cruelty and adultery. It appeared front the libel, and other proceedings exhibited, that the mar riage took.place between the partic, on-the *sth of October, 1800, at the parish church of St. Bartholomew near the Exchange, with tbe con*- sent of the tather, the ;wife being at - the time 'under the'age of twenty-one. That the parties cohabited together in Coram. , street, till the 23d of January,'l6ll, during which period there was the bb - th of five children, fotir ot which are still liv ing; when Airs. • Warint , - quitted her h u sba n d's • house, 'and went to live with her father. That soon after the marriage Mr. Waring begau to treat his wife %vial great et itchy, sw.earmgat her at dinner time, etind would often take the things off the table, and throw them under the grate, and also restrained her, front seeing her father without his knowlege. That on the night of the 6th April 18:j8, without any provoction, Mr. W. put hint self Into great pass:on, swore.that she should go out of the Lottse; beat her head ai4ditist the marble of the chimney-Piece,. Avi,erc:by, the teeth of the comb in her hair were forced into her head, which caused it to bleed very touch, and that the wounds continued .sore for a ennsiderable time afterwards. That on. their. going down to Sandgate i .,he took his female servant, Am: PoWelr, .::to the eat-1.111'2-e with'him (with whom adultery is alle . lsed to haVe been committed);, and ranged his - wife and that while at 'Sandgete he treated his wife with great cruelty. 'that on their- return frc.m Sandgate to Cora M-street, Mr. W. contioned treating his wife, and that on her miseerriaire in 1810, be compelled her to get . up, having c.om patty tai dinner, consequence of which she be came extremely "Phat in January I he put. himself into a passion with his wife, dragged her by the arm, threw her over the back ot a chair, and after Wards pushtd her into a back par lour, and locked her therein. That on the fol lowing morning she made her . eseape r to her fa ther's house, where she has continued to reide • ever.sinee. • The defence set tip was a general denial of the acts of cruelty on the part of Mr. Waring, and further stated them to have been occasioned by hei. resistance to his attempts to restrain her vio lence, when any thing occurred to rouse her na turally irritable disposition. Sir WM,' SCOTT MI § Of opinion, that this de fence Was, satisfactorily made Out; and that the provilcation in all the contests was given by firs. Waring) m id the undue violence used principally by ber, the husband acting, for the MOS:. part, on the defensive. He therefore disthissed the prayer for a divorce. • na cosra, rar,sgts caux.irtavor: nyri:. This ,i•us H., suit fin a nullity - of marriage, by reason Of minority promoteA by patio:rine Da. Costint, winstet, tbe ot Geo. Hyde, the younger of (Ad Butlingtou-share, ligaimt him, tin the ground of ins minority, he being at the time not in than 19 years of age. The birth of the minor in February 1;81, and the marriage in June MO, were proved by the itai errtitieates, and the father and motherol the Minor proved the non-consent of the 'former.—No defence hying offered, • Sit. WM. SCOTT vrnnounaced the marriage anti and void. ' NFU. V. NEIL. ....... This was .a suit fut• a di rot ei. promoted bylifary'Atin Neil, ,against her bushand, Felix ui Pritie.,'s-street, 1. - lanover- StitrarC, by reason -of cruelty and adultery. :it appeared that the purties . e..er tom-lied in. ,Vent , and tutd, . ill-treataiort.eorriplaitmt: cotnine,ncf.:tl in the ye•ar 7 tJS, and Consisted of iSia th:priviag ,if the aurnisgeter-titot the house rind F .fi Molt to 4i:rt.-alit., her loud, and ettrouragnig them to root -qt berj swearing ut iter in the grossest and most oppronriGns laiigua,,;e, rtttti beatingend otherwise ill-usrug . ' tier. Various arts at mitittr,ry, \Vail dltturtstit; servants in 1 1 ) w " e likewise spoi , Am to by the witnesses. No defence er...s oifertr4 and Sir Wm. St:Grp, after recapitulating' the evidrnet 01) k"'"d , it'fully a ease ut the ulusi aggrav ted a erueity and aliutidoticd pruSigitey against the hiuneitil. anti therefore, pronounced fur, the remedy which the wire proyjo, with .1,11 5t11 , 311111 . 2.11t having heard /wilier erideace as to the ))11s lialtWt prup,!,•ty) 4)1 . 2001. per annatu to the wife fur A bill of indictment was on Thu day found by the Grand prosecutio n o f ',Lidy Jl.4tY, .at the Sessionsllonse, ou the PEacEvAL MITFO44, for an alleged charge at pedurv, in ailltiavits which he swore respecting ,a motion recently made in the Court of King's Bench, . relative to a mutter of .1141.—Mr. ,PooLcv, for the P O ' is m si o le vc a t g l ,a t i h u a s t t the tite 7. 4 1 4 11. 7,r / 1 T! process of t h r e t said defendant tumid give 48. hours notice of bal. —The Court granted the motion. -J. Farmer, lately .convicted before the High Court of Admiralty at Edinburgh, of-having cuts,. his. ship, with intent to defraud the Underwriters, has been scatence4ito seven years transportation. OLD r, T.4E Y. p, p h, an (:1( 1 ,1 , 01 1 tookin , r NVOGItell }C'g, ‘" i with the wilful itturtidr of his wilt!, 4416 : Spit a}fiehjs. It ii,,pearcd in cc:A:et:cc, foal. ' ling; but thtre :to proof, *a! who examined the hf., , : t y,of the had cOns:cferable dittoltatrati,ri :!. blocil, and h.:r tenliffs: the ncri., jk !cir r ‘. •• • • ,;. ; i* pi.. • 1.41 t! • t: • circulatio:. !•• death in c • • • • said Lbw. - it wit:, . ; : • • , been • : ing Iro n n: t... , , , , , • t c • The •Stu."lt teat: a Loanter, the Javy, after « filature defihcrali , Not amilly. C • hariesStaulry sttod over ft .r:n A that time in a state of indiipusititio for felony and, forgery. It u*,,pearecl that on thz• I Z.ll a noteP to a con4itierahle amount, war bon:fe of, Mesiis. Giant ac,il t.o. td. I t town ; among them wki a iI2LI-: Pusi •"-This u7c.s namh;:reil and back of the bill was forged. Cliarltr• ot . f ifgastreet, pai to hi...house on tfv: 1:•t of June, an. gold coin, for the payment of *hit Pint Bil(menti.atd the indictit: it was quite sate, as he received pool. >mantel Rietairdson said ho knew parcel of nutes were seat to Itobert the Lank Post. Bill, but that the the metes in the Bill had, - by a ct withdrawn, and others substituted. as l ite priune eai r. Justices ti p th E s s ed ' n Iris seiu,witt being forged, the Jury could not find cordittgly Acquitted.. • Samuel Itobeits was put to the bar Simon Cope. It appeared by the evr was imputed to the prisoner tending drr upon him, Lb tt he and the de-ea: street, and that this quarrel atose tt of the deceased, who struck the Pris' had an infant in I,;s arms. The" and attar seine scuffling they we sel body to prove that ,the prisoner had be was immediately Acquitted. Y e ti' C.X.Cbtford, isgenteel boy. I , 3, t hrii examination at Dow-street, va t G li time ago, Was convicted of ,tea hog go 7 spoon, the property of - Mrs. her iodgings. It may :be reinviiih e ced. o 9 k _ ise _ad Ailed to the lodgings of the prosecutor great hospitality and litidnesA, which lie te" o t, her property. The Judge ma de a dint"tiv early profligacy of the boy. gANSION-Holl'SE.—Y est erriziy Wift' underwent a third examination before' MAY:OIt, Chtirgea by several anct ionee.rs c l 3! ing proper:y front' sales he had At .iir attended. !Hs comMitt,il Wit 9 illadc otrt *tug a , vnivable Bible., and se veral (Shrl fromh. , m c salc-roo of. aneti M neer, of. r. Saunders , : street. Mr. Moore, 0.1.1. road,' stated, that snqeeting the pr isoner bad cliarizeter, he was pi-oct ediug fo',.''''''. Tien he fund a. silk veil lying o f 11-. procured his address, and sent vi: hi 4 locrgingsi , Who found 109 ti. , tire G I. u filch turned out to 1:. ..-! -•.. 5t01...1 frOliittle. .1115 c, , • i:!.., '- :. ,'. '. for t'.lo coy.uty, but he I', ~ ; ..'.. id, connuit him to \rev, piti.., ils : )i.. ‘\.l-.; a . muell less exvence. 1 t l is reti,...1,,,t wv ..TAn Mokes ties ci1.,....4,e(i. 'it..l ilf4 Jane Lilywhite, a little girl cat „..„ ! Intl with assaulting a hide .girllt..l:tetio4l°;,r7 iive years . of ~,.ge. fle was C.G1111:11 The eilara;:ter of the. 11riti! .., h Ink °3 , the unticraoinir an alarming change. 0 0 crime of assassinat]on VS' OS' 31(tio) t !,1, , . 0 England ; but tie murders of the 1.,:a1:.14:10 Marrs and the Willfims.ons, of 31r. Alto( MI. and Airs , Boner, of ;qrs. Ste , plnnr:., Iriiiy equally atrocious, though of a le 3S • 101, kind, that have occurred wit'llin 0.' 4 , i;0 1, yeart, shew that theborror of itabrain&-;.0; in human blond has ilinlitli' l '''''' ' 111(1 wtl ' ' l° .pidly diminishing. To what alt! is ti l „ s ,oli .s ic a pm a ied g n ope t:l n)i i it l s ee i , i ' l o i 1 00. f i lt . : Y toehr g wi t P s; , % e ic l o i l iiieteilds:h:;t°,.irfie%ys,rel:iivell:ll,l3a,a'g.,:ai.v,ei'vt.ctil IlgiriilYeob:esiti.l,..l:fiolt'i,iitit(c;l;t ment and Legislative. , Is all this thew, WI I 10:1 no remedy can be appliede“o7:i'il! le I, '`• 111L.D. I, This Intoning, •in 13c-tztol,ti•t-ItittiOi . )!: ,, te.lcue, z4i,..4tr of John, 111-11.2,tin. • , • , Lady, at Pentatiet, in' Coral ,- r aCt . . the Iterelietilf ItOun't , • St. John'. CJlt.eti,v, Suntl4 last, ia G et -ge..4tl-"it, ..A.-ti mit: ti.io Wnt4tr-,IA ci tlso6 o, On the Istl, iuo.. at Walwarth, w,4-4:4,1$ son of :Nia: e pt It.tittringhaw, of the 11,4 41 l• , ;:1 ii;), lt 'Mar Act. sirrw, 101,1 ''. COAL ;Ni..11%.1,:i'7 Jen. Ale r• g 4 1 .1. 1 0. 26i 'Newc..e. , 4*- ' . . ' toi. ~ ..... 4 , . o A Lo '"'". --- --- ------ ', int.;e F. OF 5'X'.0::,1(,,.; yir:, ri,f.",1),*,, o_4. q.. Imliti 11 ,110 i Swath SeliStoc" ~ ? it .N v w .Art 0 4 ~ ,94, 0 ' ' 1131 :i 11 : . .. ii : ':- . tt : 1:11: ;: cit t ri:CC71 4 1 .. 'cl:I; :;; .; : : : .: 21 CF; 11')i4414.. • ' t . '°nK 1... Ann. 14..;1et,,,1* -. Con•'. l 'or . LW i a StOd; , .' ' '' . ........ 0e ~,zz...,,, .....z----......--..........:-..--....—" ~..., , --,.............. i0i,.,..... GR., . ........ ~:ro , is ~j r s LONI)()N I Pillitc , l by J. 1.3• tiAllgrAlit'4",,;4, 4f,le '' "ihiings; atilt pul.lished by 1"G'• A. SCllii:i.'.cre ua at e ti l t ' s! ('..;)ruL-r°s:Le::.lcf.terglii,:a-iltii.?iLdS)t,raStic't.l w i : 15.' t;be' ~41 v,-,1-e. eont;J:ittllliio in. :e Iv or 14;r. Ili Er ' -••_, ~ .1, ~;.,posed, it, _. ;:sie f.. , . , i, ter er d; Le ~penrtl ific,•:. it) a: vii) lot:ad iAkts!l Ile I,,iieved that it , : ~!. a s,;;;;titsiot T 112c...a.ad livi iv e l •i, c:..),,,,,,,,, ;' .4, : i a Ott re!. I. ,)i.,4 Li ~.: i,ig of i f ! i •:,, i; :le 1+54 o di 4 ;1•;:t0yottell. ' -11; .:‘,...",•,, !! ki(t,i;s1.0110! at:, , ' ...:.: 1 :. ~...•.. ....:,,,. 14.1.tAd v.''''', I i,:il Seisir*„2l 1, ' ',,, Li ..1 , ..3 v. tt . :011. , 4 ; 4 ..: , Apj!, 1 ~;iil tt P,,. b.x 10 , ..1 i fv.itu.4ll4.or 1- i',.,;-!•,1,,,,1c0.11);5.,, Ttt, ?'l:t, a: Ihtt v ~'" Ili i I '4,.! jpedtle,eitev r• , 4, 41( C , I, th3t tiit,iscil(7,`-'. td vu, ckascd 1 graiti? H2lt he riiPdzlis 1" -,,, r;.a,sor ~, ~ leak, riff -, !,, , 1 . , , ; it rd irou. p., zo .... 4 , it,a i..i the pli'.'lltft ' • y , t pr,,if, vtlitit L.l rris ,uo. did tot V. I t Ltioic.,l rrepOtl.o4,4 ' ag up th l e tOteria boat a knosodifi ',I. Ilia d him 4uilty. i'' o Nitre 11'4' 11' r upon ac • ! , fit: . is vilieoce, in 41;°!-I., Ma 1;* to by t',l. OM ; : a d had tt i*,lrni." ...' frow Ott riale4t ',,,,, Xi, i Ltit,lelici;(ttteetij, tillit,leto, 'you iivivr ili the bit g',.,; 1 i.i....):“..1 retaid s!,ere . 1 t , 4.,),!,(.1, ii,l3, ,tha.ll.l4viddrs,:irr,%, , , C L I: it gold vottO attd 1, 'II, of 10i,43'.51,0 )111, A ,th;ittiii,.: yotiO,", , lii tt,r,lo tre•lte,l PI ~:. hhr reAnvil iiy's`. hi lex caouzicid* r Al it , •••••-....--,:•—•• ' 11 • • c ii ly I'l /+n J. 1),./4,..„ th,,, „,t ,v11...4 hi , ati At dark reilt ~ (A, $ Illftdc Ii" 1.. r". 4 i) 41 e..veral ()thr ',, I n , SakklidtkrS, ': s'.' n: cer, o f i::: ',*. ,' 4 0 (he pr:, !, i ,''' I i s: ''lill,g tcy,,c H: v.' 7 't ying o f 11. (..I,eT J'1.,,, , • .', , ~,i t, I, . , k 11 14;4,-. 0 k i ''' • It, ' Toll A!t1..14 ~. ' - ..st 100. (0 . J . J J I, . impllteil w tug., gach....••• liarized to scenes of blond ? Sunday se'nnight, n w•Onlan 2t Cifel l lC t e rl 1 ed 'Mary Beaconfiebl, put .01 aid . " ') of (I to by lninging herself ; hbe beg c , 10 1 0 - triunity of Anabaptists in that tow!! litlif et! the meeting three times oa the aDg; i tit was frequently Iteat(l to say, verYil lf : ' hi d i t'' 'there was :in t alvatian For bet', all t " ; te' tlettell a lost soul. , , r the An antiquarian at the west end oi t 1 v ,:O, in 11OSSCSi011 Of a' wig, %rhich, he sl)'= i ",, ( worn by Augutitus.,Ciesar a t the lisu' li tie It h. rawcr is. - , f Tl''' mornlmr, nt Seruetset-pLi.v, the , lioolton 11,irtv.ell, of .i scat. On the 14t)vin3t. to Iluvon,stre,44ti Ed il ' t 1 ' iltn. 1.,:t1y Antr‘Vart t iox, of tk koa.