The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-18 00:00:00

• ice J 1 " . 0 - • .., jr , ...., ' A k . o l , , ' '' ''t• ' .. " -' 4‘ • ii C.l 4; • 1 A • • ' i i: , ,,, ::, -, , \ ~,A '• I, 7•-• , I . C ' ~ , J • Ph, • ?, k 4. ., i: rt a 4,4%4 t, •. .1 , A 'J . , .41. • • 1' r of , w Ntimptit 6404.] T 11 URSD A. Is; 4.1. it Cll 18, 1813. EkRICt StX.PP,NCE-1-IAI:VP/Ornr. THEATRE ROYAL, DRUII.V-LANE. r I S PRESENT EVENING, March I 8, 1813, Majesties' servants will perfoi•ni the Opera of THE DEVIL'S BRiDe4l;l. t)t , ;Era time at this Tjseatre) the Musical , entertain . f • 111:11E C II II,76REN ment IN o THE WOOD - . s' "" nd P vice Ss. (;d.—Pit, 3s: t',41.; Second Price, N•th, . 13 . 1 l ery 25.• S econ d Price, Is Upper Gallery, Is. - .rice, 6d. - • ORATORIOS. ? HE ATRE R)YAL, COVENT-GARDEN: '1011.R0117, FRIDAY, . March 19, 1813, 4t performed (by particular desire) the sacred PrA -TitE MESSIAH. • Aning.efil v G. F. HANDEL. i".T.1311,411AA1 Will sing " Comfort ye my people," 44„ . 1 ,1 i rttliAe," and " 'non shalt break them." ,"• lintwho "Ray abide," '' Why do the Nations," Ml l 4l '"rtie trumpet shall sound." rINNEY, .4 For behold darkness. G Altil EFT, " 0 th ou . that* tellest." ibot t Ir ON, " Ile sh a ll feed," " He was despised." A44,1,11.t!UNG, Ilaw' beautiful," "If Grid be for us." The Pasto r al Scene, "There were shep -411'4 1 " te k'ice ••ti • " Come unto him," B 4 lt • • 1 h„, 10" •)i 4bt p." 4., and " I kauw that 'in_ y , Redeemer liveth ' " , WEsLEY will 'rep eat the Con whittisli'/pll'on in which is introduced the Fugue from I t 3 S4A ! Principal Performerts, N'T .t • • KIN(' and Miss BOLTON I ZIS (1 a • . *qr' IIItAHANI, GARRET'', Mt. TINNEY, and Mr. LACY. ~43„.41er of th e Band, Mr. ASHLEY. 4ne r, 1114 4 ;,,tu, h.. r SAMUEL WESLEY.. t''t•fl N il .'" of Bend and the Cliornsses, by the most, utt t 0 t ormers,. Niened at Sii, and commence at Seven pre -7zl. Pit 3s. 6d. Gall. 2s. Upper Gall. Is.-- fPorle, commences at Nine o'Clock. (ties to be taken of Mr. Brandan,.at the "ct, from Ten till Four. IMVE4IAL :PARLIAMENT. HOUSE Ole LORDS, NyEntrasfinv, NAucn - The second reading of the Bill to dissolve the Marriage between Fleury ChainbeAayne, and Eliza his now Wife, being moved„Counsel and Evidence accordingly appeared at the Bar in sup— . port of the Bill. Mr. Nolan was the Counsel ; but some of the Witnesses, as to one of the es sential preliminary proofs, not being in attend mice, the consideration of the case could not proceed. The LORD CHANCELLOR, ir s i'llte course of tlie: proceedings, observed, that in . a case where only one shilling dhmages are awarded in the Court below, very cireiunstantial evidence would here , (wired, as to the important facts.,. by their Lord ships.. He also observed, that with respect to the marriage register, the hand-writing of the parties must be proved by one of the attesting witnes ses, and also that the Lady,was of - uge at the . period of the marriage, otherwise - she could not be legally married without consent and license. The farther consideration of the 'Bill was ad , journed‘ till. Wednesday next. Mr. Aldworth, from the Commissinnerr of the Thames Navigation, presented au ,A.ccount of the Receipts 'imp Disbursements of that Cow. pany for the year 1812, which %vacs laid upon the Earl TALBOT pregented a Petition from certain manutaetureri alulsother lnhabitants of the sown of Birmingham, in favone of the renewal of the East India Company's ChArter, / under certain Modifications, • His Lordship also presented a Petition from' 'hest Bromley, and certainother perishes in Stuf fordshirt to the sum! effect. . Both these documents being read, were order 7 ed to lie on the t4hle. _ 777.-41,414 V G- OFFICE, March . it, 1 812. SSIONERS for • ,1 " ' C '':4VYdo hel4ky give Notice, Taat .iOth invant, they will be ready . , to re " ritiV (waled up ), find treat -for Two ATME Al, and Sixty Tons of VIRGINIA deliivred tlie space of Six Ireek.l won t tit the .poita and in the pioper. . • • Oitmeal. Tobacco. ........... 100 Tons. 30 'rons. ....... ... .50 Several privati•Bills were I:ought up from We Commons by Sir H. V, Tempt.st, J ‘ Graham, w: Rowley, and othei Members, and respectively read a first time. . A Petition. was Presemed, on the part of the London Wet Docks Company, by Lord WA S i NO^ }mg, praying that the India and. China Trade may, as beretoforg, be con6hed to the Port of London, which., was ordered to lie o),1 the. table. _ ...... •50 • by bill s, 200 Tons. h hte Tons. """1 ' PaNable witreet, Ninety the Contra c t m a y 5 G • 4een at the Secre ie Ana wards ~.t to any rtntiferlin 14)1iich .the Price te,t th ,ll net be " e i" " One o'Ctock'O!'t th; 7t eta tha Tal'sdaY, noe niaN,ty• p, 4 , 64 1060 ate the Tender, 164 64:4411, al,tende, when relied On tbe motion of the Earl of Ihanom'eN, the Stipendiary Curates Rill was ordered to be re-cons mined on Tuesday•next, and their Lordships sum moned on the occasion, ?Irljourfiecl till to-morrolV. 7111.441.14VG-OFFICB, March 17; 1313 ' ,SSIONERSJOr PICTVALLM,; virs N.- /PIT do hereb y Bio° A cc the 2014 instant., they unit be reaa.V to , 00d rreal tq l 799 and treat One , lomat! ne , yelsantable RICE; to be an. of One Pound Wei ht each, to be pia' ndera ; to b e deliverea, in the se" ,of afajest y ' s - P ictualling Scores at VePti ; Bille, payabl e *la /uterefl, riitecty .0!/- _„ the Contract may Le lien at `the Secre- • had to any ,l'esodor iu whi . oh the Price , iii words at icoglh, or,that shall 11 ," Board before 0,,e o'Cloth,ln the said 20th Instant, nor nntess the Person who or some Person on his Behalf, oltendi firr. I4VD!4 110LIS.E. March 171 18 1 3. qDIRECTORS of the UNITED of IIfERCII4X7'S do heriby ;Five Notice. .13IiLY If: NE C()VRTgf the said 'to be held at thiqr House in Leadenhall ntxt, the 24th Instant, at Eleven:o'ol°c* ,p nade.SP.ECI. , II/, upon matters respect 'he Campanys Charter. r d'illl4S CLIVE, 44,ssistant Sectvtary• 11 COMMODIOUS MERCANTILE or RESIDENCF,, on the Nast side of KING'S ROAD BEDFORD-ROW. F. SOLD BY AUCTION, SMALLWOOIj, aolomew-lano, on Tuosslay the 23,j of ..1813, at l'w.elvt • ' LEASE of a tlesiitable HOUSE, 'street, King's-road, Bcdford-row, held 41 years and a half, from Lady Day next, tamable for a mercantite or professional ;Watd far the accoitimodation of a gen ming a laTge Emil light .kitcheq, haulm ''house, pantry; extensive wine hid coal -room, brealifiist-parlour, handsome' en- 1 Atore-room and yard, lofty drawng ( lbors, spacious charabers, with crosqs, iy prv,Psses%ioo may he had, and - the premises viewed i tliv i!o e us to the sale (with Ticketb) which, with Pas b had of Mr. Smallwood, Bloomshury-sijuare. . _ 44,14---- r 014 lIESIDENC, SOH-SQUAItEI ' Wirrii IMMEDIAP EPE POSESSOION. ..-...,.... TO B • P SOLD DV AUCTION) ..., • lit the Auer4`3ll IIY . Mr, SIiA LLWOPD, Mart, Ba rtholomew -lane, on 'Tuesday Sad tr? .. March, it ia, at TwelVe o'clock) . , Tl'PrJrulY Val' bit .LEASE of a commodious '94,1,11-t, No. ,121,40 u• the west side of Soho Squaie,_ in Iva, i„,.. gutiatantial and he repair (,a eutisideitr,ahcl. 4te ii"ell,114,11 been recently expended upon the premises) t il'islot! 4 4 4 ;1 : `." 1 ; a term of twelve years , at a moderate fen_ , lan d I f " the t''4l.l3' suit for a prdessionel or medial!' .11 1 .41„,. ,ittmniodittio n o f a genteel family; comprisin g . a ilttr'4i'',lrmice hall, excellent (lining and brealtf4t . parloins, 144tti,,1Z,N1) light atair.e.a;e, sp4cious drawing-room! I'kli rto,,,Y I:,ll'ej.td Ind bor4ercii, with gilt mouldings ; a a n ni t i intiattit%, *iii"lilig, cheerful chambers dressing- n it Vry i , t , t terraCed -Hours, convenient ki.tchen7putt_ntry., t 4" e . I tt lAte 'ofbee lar,,e yard, with a, building in Uenn 4,414,4 41.4.!);irrrted il'ita aricoacl4..hunse and stahl b i a ne. at 0, t 'th V e . ‘et i- till the sale, arid particulars the 4%.4'114,444414-411kin tiardou Chainbers, and , of Mr. Small. uaiultic. • • . HOUSE OF COMMONS, 'WEDNESDAY; Nakcit 17.. General MATHEW said, that as an Hotiourab Baronet (Sir T. H. Cox) had, on a preceding. night, given notice that be would move for a Se lect Committee on the Catholic Claims, he (Gen. Mathew) if the motion was persevered in,. would take the sense of the House upon it. Sir J. 11. - Cox expressed his ,determination to preseveyc in this motion. , The Member for Youghat ,was declared, duly elected. DOGDALE presented a Petition tram some merchants of- Birmingham, praying a renewal of the East India .Company's , Charter. The Admiralty Register Bill was ordered to be rend a third time on iNionday the 29th. The Order of the Day for the third reading of the Shop Lifters which stood for Friday, was put off . tit Friday se,nnight. ' The Marine Mutiny Bill was read a first time. The High Treason Amendment 'Bill was order ed to be read a second time on Friday se'nuight The Mutiny Bill was read a third time and passed. Lord A. HAnit.ToN gave notice, that be would on this day se'rinighr, move foi the remainder of the evidence that calme before the Committee on the Weymouth Election. 41', "- commie , ro.r the iiox, ,ve 5,............_ticel liart-treel —"---..------ .P P/C7' I.; tilE C OMMiS k ?Mt 111-IJZSTY kik 4 L . 1 44 ,k 014 41 14:.ehdere in t or s i f'd rtoik of nit TOII4CCO ; t o ' 4,.°4 Pictualling;: Olderotentionedt lteptford ..... Portanlntltil .. Plyiltouth. •• -. , ifo be ;told fir b ' . t otter date... . he Co °4 nditi a q ' i Office. regard will l ic 4 ‘51 ,re iovertest ~ red !t, the Ito* 413111 illaZet4, 'me oftwPrrion 44 ki, ~- 1,„ • - , ~.. I' lC7 0,.., itt iti,..hth:S2 I f 4 t.,, • • aturrlay vea.., , i4:it, ,„,/,,,,, ii 4 1 r :tl ~, Ifttl :rwts of go ` , '' 4l , 1,, V si ,e L.,, k. any es 01,,,:,,,t0i1a the Tema c . y ' ,'&4l, Into his 3? 0, :- !4 j,y:.;)!aitifor by ~ t, . . I.,,tplfe e`' r,ohditiotte of ‘ , l dk: u.llice. r ; 4 " gerd will he , , kt be inserter, , °, detiz;crol to t4 e ' • i' ' i tiav 7 A , , 4, "n, the' 2 ,444:"! Pottier, or .e. toltru trilled --_,... [ .E.-1,1 4 ; lit CO tilt Tc , ,,, t„,..0 11,11.1.14 Ar ), ', lfrnt in 14e 4;48' t:aki th e 9 f 1i117.1: .114'4Y: ttkooinisel t i ti4'l' l ‘ 4 4'ditesdhy C7oloon, 4, yl, en ovoi of . tt, iii1ict , i....„„...._....._.:_f, j. „!1;s11‘ % il , : IAL uric i 'INSI()NiI.I. , 'titN•sTicie.iil., h . " TO BY g , 4t Ey lJ Ol e . N4rt, Barth 0 i'l iltal*ii, ri, ‘,lll'. Vititlabig t'4,,,,,k (22, Jtkhrk.: 4 itt ~ I"tk - 11 of silsteitC 11444441 e eelit, h 4.,, , and calet ' ( te'llY; enulthris 1 ~ ~littni, v5i,..%1)-1 i I ' , 4 ! 1;1.04 (lining. kokt, 'K.tter-cloitet, 1/4,44 i With fotllit)g ,1444ttiok, &e. ' 7911."41te p0g5...,1 1,,. 1 11 , .. PETITI)N OF SIR JOHN AND LADY nouGbAs. Mr. Wittypaann said, that a Petition had been put into his hand by an individual, Major Gene ral Sir John Douglas. It was signed by. Sir John Douglas, and Charlotte his wife. Th e re tition was then brought up and read. It stated that it had been represented to the Petitioners, that the depositions made by them on of about the Ist of June, 1806, were not made befOre such a tribunal as would, if they were false, subject zhem to a proJecutinn for perjury. That confident of the truth of that which they had deposed they were willing, and wished to re-swear wli;at they had then offacd 'before such a tribunal, as would subject them to the penaltiel of pnrjury, -if preiv. : ' ed to be false. In conclusion, it prayed the House to order such proceedings as might enable them to , renew their depositions, it being their anxioni wish not to be sheltered from prosecution by any forms, of law. The petition was ordered to lie table. MR. WHITBREAD'S MOTION.. Mr.,WftyrDREAD said, that when-, on a former night, he proposed certain questions to the Noble Lord opposite (Castlereagh), which questions had been allowed to pass without- an answer, he then stated what he wouldnow re-state, and what, be fore he sat' down, be would shew from internal evidence" He had sour hopes that in the discus-, sion which took place on the Friday preceding, an end would be put to all the nauseous stories and painful circumstances that so ling troubled the public mind. He said then whit he now again repeated, tkat fiom every thing vatieh fell from the Noble Lord opposite (Castlereagh) , from every thing which fell from 'Ministers on the'subject, Iron, every word uttered by th e M em b ers ot that House, who had spoke that; sentiments upon the question, the impression upon his Mind, and lie . belieired upon the minds of the public, wits. a ver dict of acquittal for her Royal Highness the Prin.- ceSs of Wailes. It was possible that, front the particular ?tile of the Noble Lord's elocution, he might have misunderstood him ; be did, however, suppose that-Noble Lord to have stated, that by the Cabinet of .1807, her Royal ,Highness stood completely acquittedeof the eh arge - broiaght against her. He was informed the other night, that the Noble LOrd, in what be stated, added a word which, if it were at all used, certainly escaped his recollec tion. i he words said to be used, and arhiCh ,es , eaped his recollection, were, that her Royal High ness was freed, in the mind. of that Cabinet, et•all legal criminality. He did not remember to have beard such words. On the night in which the aubieet was ; tinder consideration ;before; it was *aid, that no .verAct.of guilt or acquittal had been pkonouneed• by the House. No verdict was cer tainly pronounced by the House ; but that verdict of acquittal was ,pronounced by the , Noble Lord himself) that verdict was recorded in the Cabinet- Minutes which had been read; which appeared to Aim then, and did stilt, and Must ever appear to him, a verdict of complete acquittalfi-Mn all charge, - of criminality. NottVithstanding any family diffe rences that migh.t have existed, notwithstanding the stories, nauseous and disgusting as; they were, whiih had gone abroad upon the subjed; notwith standing any trifling occasion for dislike that might have existed, he did hope and conceive, that Jsy judicious advice to both parties,by wise and early interference, an end would have been put, he was certain, an end might have been put to circuit'- stances so unpleasant to the persona more imme diately concerned. ~.1-/e thought the breach, such as it Was, 'might, by snch interference, have been So far healed as to prevent the disturbance of pub lic feeling. To questions which he put the other night, lie understood the Noble Lord, to say . , that te would ahswer when this motion 1... as brought' forward. He would now ask 'him, whether the Persons whom he had stigniatited as perjured wit ' besses, lied,. not been examined upon the same Subject. atter this stigma was thrown Upon thern. He WaSinforme'd by Sir Jobu'Doug:a3, that since the 13th of February, the tune in which such lan guage was used; both he any Lady Douglas had been examined as compez.ent Witnesses, and their exaMinations• taken before a Magistrate. Sir :rob n • declared that be was under spme infatuation frOm this apparent cootradiction, not 'only thinking tikt-ht.was believe,T in his former depositions, but, that be . was to be examined He said that , be waited upon 'the Noble Lord (tastiereMh)', and when the. Noble Lord said that he did' not know. 6f . hisseaatbiblat ion. sir' J. replied, 4 ` if you do not, the Lord Chancellor does." Was it then a fact, that one part of the Cabinet knew nothing of what was done by'another part? Did not the right hand, know what was done by theleft I Could Lord Eldon lend himself to an, exantination that• was unknown 'to the rest of his Colleagues ?.Sir J. Douglas said, that he' must have redress; that he himself knew enicli .Mort—that Lady Douglass' knew much more ithan they had yet disclosed.— .When application was made fo hint to present the petition, he informed Sir John Douglas that no Member of the fibti*e of Commons would refuse such an applicatiOn ; that it-was the duty pt every' Member -to present . any petition not epntaining improper 'hatter, and he willingly undertook the charge of,presenting it, more particularly when he sv . aS informed that the investigation was notyet asleep ; tbpt it was yet going otr, under the sane . tion of the Lord Chancellor of Englimil. When , • he discovered . this, be became - convinced that some step must be taken in the business ;. that it was utterly impossible it could be allowed to continue in such a state um: longer. He knew that advice had been giVen irom high legal tiothii • rity, for the prosecution of -her Royal High ' -nesas accusers; and he still heard that examiiia tiona were going forward, that agents "were tat work in every direction, that the same Soli eitOrs were eniplOyed, that in every corner where' a scrap of intelligence could be gathered, in every part of the metropolis, and its neighbourhood!, • investigation was going fOrward. , This he 'heard, this lie believed 'to be the fact. He woald ask whether the Noble Lord opposite (Castlereagh), err whether the Lord Chancellor, had any know- , ledge of, or any concerti in, these:investigations ? If they ,were not condected withtheir knowledge, ' Were there then any secret advisers %of his Royal Highness ? • Any7persons enkeoWn to his " tern secret agency behind the throne that' advised or conducted stisli investigations ? If that were really the cat e, and' that the , Noble Lord or hit colleagues were conscious of it, they were bound in duty' to their country to declare it He would now advert to Imue of 'the circumstances which atZomptinied the publication of the docu ments by which the public feeling had been lat e ly sa emelt occupied. After the . lapse of .a.: week the timethe Minute of Corincil bad been read in the House, the same' depositions came Out in taro Morning- Papers. The Morning Herald' wits that to which he more particularly alluded. in that Paper tvere published tke dep o siti ons o f Si r John and Lady Donglas:' To him it did appear, he might however have been mistaken, but it did appear to him, from the language used by the NO hie Lord (CuStlerh4ll) on a former night, that he meant - to justify that publication by the complaint he uttered of the garbled extracts that bad been read in the House. In his Mied nothing , could justity The publication was.alike injurious to the public and the Royal Personage to whom it referred. It could; not be justified by the minute of evidence he (Mr. Whitbread) had' read in the Hoassit. It was not a garbled extract. It was a minute delivered to the person whose ac quittal wais tironotinced in it. He was accused ' with being the first_peCson who read in that House Minute of Council. Such COnduct s he *butt' contend, seaer, parliamentary stud justifiable. read the whOle,'of ... the minute. 'The -Noble Lord accused bini•aergarbling it. Neither was he the. first person 'whoaead.it, The lion. Gentlemen behind him (Kr: Johnstone) - hed the priority. It any blame, therefore, could attach for the first ,reading, it belonged to that Hon. Getitleenlie and if there was any - credit, he willingly roii ned. it to him. This, laowever, was not the first time in Which Minutes of Council and gurbleskixtraete weere .read. It was the origin of the Portholl 'Cabinet. At that tithe ,things were peblisho 'which could only come from the Minutes of the Council Book. The letters of a Prote;tant were at that time ascribed to, a period in friendship wish the Noble Lord (,Castlereagh), He read the nti. nute for the purpose of Shoving that it declared the complete acquittal of , her Royal Highness, ant that the preselit Cabinet disagreed upon that sehe , ject, with the persons in concurrence with whore .. • , they formerly acted, vtith the persons who pub' fished her innocence ;in that Minute, who were her advisers and her defenders, and who at leugtb., after every effort that had been made against her reputation, led her triumphantly into the pre sence of his Majesty., There was another Minute which went as much as the one he. had read to hove her innocenee. It was that in whi c h h er oyal Highness desired that an apartment might be allotted to her in the Royal residence, for the greater convenience of attending the drawing , rooms of the Queen. The Cabinet of that time gave it as their opinion, that such an apartment should be assigned to her,- but left it to his Ma jesty to determine. After ell this it was thong:lt necessary, for what reason he would not proopst to say, to publish the Morning Herald such do , currents as appeared ealculated to criminate the Princess of Wales. Whoever observed 'the crest that was displayed upon that paper--...whoe er' considered the character and circumstances of the Reverend Gentleman who was the proprietor of distinguished as a divine, well known l4y his theologieal as well, as his- political productions; raised to church dignities and to other honours out of the usual course —whoever considered all., this, must naturally .conclude, than what appeared _in that paper was - not disagreeable in a certain quarter. The Princess of Wilk^ was' deelared by two Cabinets to be innocent, o be completely ace quitteel'Of the eherge brought against her, and in consequence of this acquittal, it. was, thought nee • ceslary to give again to the world those deposi ' tions which were deelared to be a perjury. He . '-did not mean to say that the Noble Lord detArell them to be a pedury, but supposed him to have made such 'a declaration. But after the publica tion of the Minute, which seeated to declare thein a perjury, there came out upoo the world, all • those nauseous and, dissgusting storks con. : tamed in a volume which he then 110 by .bun, and to which,. whatever. might. have been their political hostility, he %A* sorry to see the name of the Right Hon. Spencer rerceVal ; andto per ceive, that the_presi7, in the printing thathook, was corrected by him. That Right Itonattret! Gentlentan told her Royttl Highness, that she must submit to such ri publication, that it was ne- - cesSary to her defence; but now when he was dead, and when documents were read in that House, ' that went to shield her against tie.t hook, the book it se lf 'Was published,' not for the purpose of. defence, as Mr. -Perccval intended, but fin. the purpose of condemnation. Whet we:- 'man was ever so cruelly cirCurnstaneed lie was not the Advocate of the Princess of Wales. He did not bring forWersi his motion for that pur pose. He walk the advocate of justice.' • • the bounden, duty `.of, the Ifouseto cope to l . speedy decision up o n the Subject. It should no longer be allowed to remein in tincertaitity eleven yerirS.had now elapsed since the come thencernent of it, Mid it was not yet brought to a decision. Her Royal Highness had always from the beginning Celled • loudly for trial. lolSOti, she' called for' trial. In 181,3, she threw herself upon the-Prince,' declaring her innocence ; she wrote a letter to that ; House, chtiining not pro! tcction or forgiveness-, but claiming trial, anti. disitvoWing guilt. Try me, says she, before competent tribunal ; no, say you, before a tribe- nal unknowteto the lawS.of the country ; tryolei . Says she, before., my Peers ; no, say you, bot'be, fore every alehouse throughout the country,, ti subject for every fon!,tne, c,Fpcised, enprotectect, undelended.—He clainied nothing for her Rori Highness byway of mercy . , but he called npreethc, - House to bring the mutter to a crisis, and not ar4 low her longer to con;intie in such, a state of suf fering. lie' demanded nothitni but Theie were' various mwles ot procteeditor by which.the Howe nt'ight C1)111C to some decision. if such .was not the case, he was misled hy the Reprt of the Commissioner's. He thought this conclusion _might be come to by such an Addresl, for the prosecution cif Sie soul Lady Dost, , giro, as he had intended. Ishese ,persons Were iu tire sauna state Of suspense as the Prinve,es her self. If they were innocent,. they were much in . .. were guilty, they, should br' prt ni:laiecr? ( :, 11.i f difficulty thiey witsy: not hie against them. Ile was ineline,d therefOrt: to desist from the , motion of ii7lrith he had giveit. nonce, and to shape it son/ to get rid tech nical difficulty. T . ll justification to the Vrince.s, he would state a circumstance of conduct against which, if trite, the puica innocence could be Do protection- It appeared that . the aeposition of one, -of the witnesses against the Princess bad been contradicted upon oath, and yvt an insinua tion was said to have been thrown out that 501 contradiction, even ,upon the oath of a respect able person, might not perhaps have been true. If such was the case, what protection could there