The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-18 00:00:00

Itted to' lie sent. In the news -! Sind • uldle on .41ie head; of those:. .env thing to do with those 4',..‘thich they had ric.en, He ws~ts' It should• be so, and !‘ liti•e;* Said: entleniati, wilt great animation ! C it; .of the Princess of %Vales, i "cities, and 'let us go to the proof 1, they brine; agaiiict her. I do not 'cent,- hut the law says,; she is inno he proved guilty." I.le then com ic imfortunate situation of the Prin • whom lie described to he the most :he niosi unprotected. -. Ile then ad case of the King's Sister, the late ; •ninark, and Shortly .detailed the sufferings, her 'wrongs, and her . : ,Princess of Wales, like Caroline not in her, natiye country. In the ;he Matilda it was. said she had no appeal to for jut ice, but had she tud,she would not have wanted de tribunal to which iiITIOCCIICe could peal. This had been said at that it should seem, in the case of the ales, she cou ld appea l to no tr ib una i ix gallant father had lost his life at Jena ;• his great ;heart *burst with . tilts of the successes of the French. had however the Satisfaction to -e died in thorough; coisiplete, en 14tPrerki,oasiira of her innocence. s e h . e t ooi ` l ' l l3 ow n a few nionths tret ot laitiv protect .; her. .What p jj r r otection lie '1,,,`,()"‘3/4,(lti.iii defenceless . 14144(1. the law ? .11e foreigner . seek b rit that .. atu. who protected • ~ " 4 , 41t1it, (George the could no I:erfer- di Mailf of the PrineesS of %Vales ; her 'l', Withdrew liis• comitenance 'from her ; and It they ,•• the Represent a t ives o r t i lt people of t . ) refus e her their •suppo.rt in this crisis She emildretire-to time house of her was satisfi e d of b et ' innocence. -Her .4"utlier too, who wits here, but unable to }l'as also satisfied she had..heetruspe,s -c'4l(l have wishedshe had not sent that ; lttler to the King, winch ;she. had °cell advised to send; itti d the the let ter . Which lie hail written, to be 'NI with that dietated by Mr. PerCeval: On tip 'llr Initeir, but he would not execute, I)(,:rcevill but if he could lie Would . on Laird Eldon, on . .wboin he J"'tie: might to be clone ;. and lie would lar.its lay iii• id pow s ?r,' if Ike ,could ( 1 9' .;cHyttl. if 4 . an act o f severity: to the .nte,liory of this : hitsine3 s ( ' hr(nlght 0)1.4.. Qll. F v e" now, :with the operations of good ..sides, tt, dune. A o f . )Le' I 1..)1j1 cOnclii'Ottol.lcx,islt~lon one . sl( l, *- similar...spirit re der, one , of the b y rood advice on ; : that gieatest boons that could be ( . 4 ..w_lslled 'for, unight he given to •this Ile isi,tated ire his intention to "I making the illotiott lie had iiitunded teq'N.\,,,,ak: .., "11111.1"ar Y JO the iti,,tl•oo With "tit tO Cuuell,:!e, he would pat in )) Lle•tirs • 1'41)08, containing, t h e depositions.. Ityituess.e :pit the beirtlti vestigation• -Ole ds " 7.71 e NOrning .1)0Ni of the data° and ,The Aloe (tin o f , e. Ile concluded lay Inswing 4(1.- " Itegeat, e xpressing:the - deep Concern with-which that 1/oust! had seen lon of ttocuments; so offensive to de 'n°rals, 'and time feelingt of 'his loyal,. atld praying his Itoy,al Highness to give to take suell uteasures against all the "Incerned in publishing the same is Might , try to prevent the repetition or continu ttelt art offone e. ~ trAtTlieltEnOtt knew not what good p.ur -1(1.1re• answered by . .what had falien , froin ~. Gentleman, though( it cOttld•not thntieti- that • there had i n Publishing those documents % " " . ."nder4t. , tical t o be favourable, to the 'lle 6 nt ' referrell ,the ,corre.ctness of this , the papers Which' had : appeared• in the 11 P . ri nti• 'lie agreed with Atte " e " t , k ," :\l'oliarchy- was .cOncerned 'i" t ilt s "tbat it le a s at present in Parliament,• , , ,at course w h ic h its wisdom ought to die-. it:lPresent occasion. The . courqe taken _ll. Gentleman, by thmi . ght it 1‘,1,"° Practical reSnit, but to that otc.pro ,.!etlles, like that - which he had this night "WV' " • »inion, to paiii,,,oug it, it 3 t _ ". It appeared to that under the , Wakin g .a d e f ence - for •the 'Princess of te t i ge Hon. Getithanan had indulged in a tinfair, and nnparliamentary attack i t , Ilighue,l3 the Prince .Regetit• al here begged thot,..the words Lord might he taken downs 1- ' l4-I 't.r.au.).llit was proceeding to speak, called to order, and sat down. 'e -St eit.--..!‘ The flail. Cletitlernan will are the words which lie alleges to. have b Y the N o bl e Lord, anti the (Clerk will la down." • I .4IIIII tEAD-7.-`" That the. Hon. Gentls rll the mask of defending the. PritteeSS of -ulna 4 intlidged hiniteif in a most 1 Itice I te . unparliantentary attack the } 4 , 1 11, 4 (~ erit,n ,o'',erk,,havilqr, taken down the words, read ,I r tle. 'v l i rs R EAn . called o n th e - N o bl e Lord to Ti le 4 e '". ~• , 4 'PR AKJ : , said, th e course now to he purs ue d • r tri dtiti "- fir4t.piace for the - Noble Lordto.athuit • Words itiipoted to him. • 'Y ti. had nothing to offer in the t(Tatiol • i t 5., p, „ , , “I d inciiiired if the Noble Lord. ;401 .1 "'id 'ti t • -11 hire rvor,, , , to otter? '; '1 1 •'.ft .e q, s • say , %%mild ;;'trite le ~c!) et t f itit ? !',e thought the lion. ' . ..ifemlier had !Jul ( ) h ' 'l' AN e • Lou, L "Ylle#ll, that lie 110'1. i\leniber's woidtt have restrained him 'froin into tilseussion theTersolial w(, re AnoWn to exist hetiveen her 1 " t ; T 1 1'11 . '1.) • ' • 1 , t he lance ot. ales. .13th ""uer had -O • y cone il lino trtUt conek‘‘,y4l, m oshe‘v tire t even '41.7 arguent, t 111 •' Is • been a co/1641er- I 4 iteq - pcsr i. be t 411 , ri it v ' 4 i : proce,,,lii i ',o ha 4 had .1 totlrsl4l','; 0,,t ~,!.1 al, int tha i i ~, , lion, G e : iii ~. ere, in the. ti all l ier. ~ 0 ,, ', .C, 4.; 4,,e charges itile .s-,,nna lb . : tilt she. b 'ltd the ; 6 f.Wales, ii , ett, arid t 1 , to the c fi , , etl' of D e I: ... 7 of her . aril, file ,i ~ 14414 * in ,„ et , URS. I il, '‘'' Gir i• ,4, tt,r4, f (1 ill j i , , l ' 1 ? 4 , 4 :4 tt, ap ;dr; 4 ,0 : 111} glail - ' kt , $ tor a t to ti t 4 htly api ) o d! Ol hilt p„ w 0:144"5' ill AV't elq i t ' l l" ic e , n, a tele of ttet, kt the rest , i t) Priacess 4 i t;t :*, th at he ,a -Doh- . 01 c,„,, 1 . 1 111 14, ~fir ihtcrtelit ::''' tlititiii)aii:ll:;l t Plight they, o }' 11. 4 1, 0 , 0 '9') ill tt', ,ti '"er fate 'tier . iv ; $Ol- ikit,h,„" • ' t 116 , t ' 1 it t lie Cc,' I 4 ' ,44,1 i toitig. r ,Z e 'lY h et I t r.t(?C., t . 4 tin 0 , ared %%, • ' . th ' ' c t ite ~ lit . ~, .. 1 11•• v ,.,, , i '` ,h u t Jus 1) ;) . i l . ' Itvi. WA ( 1, -• 1 "it i ' evt • ' to 4 , d eti6i s e , ;, 1 e on. fb ;i' , r ` t Cu°l LI , . l o t ~,- ! slut il c. other, IA- po or , C "t fi . on t , I e ...1 / ~ tittt licia lie NI. :1 411 N e ~ ,:.: Will (;i1 )(to( '4 '," , 1)4 1 li'' t flu 44 1 be ' 0 .q 4 Ro i i td 4 4 1k 7 1, klit It ibi * S' l Jtt.(, ' l' ' ' tf " ill fP. ia l 4ii t „ -' t 11 40 " cont t's c ilk, 413 sithi '. 1, 0 ' ttei 1 1 td,c 4t, , ' t it! I , tti i ttl, q 4 ti) c, l I, .►1 4, 4 i 1, Yal) I " N ‘'re. 'g. iice ss i tn , 3 a 14 jik'''"enr lie ,' i 4 ti firini 1% 1 , l at ttki I P" i I '; :14t ll t titat th ' lle I II oo i f n . gu t ' s' 110 # iN t tl ,t; sp ec . lit h " with I f' ""ke4l ,' of . A 1 1 ,4 It , 4., ,• the. ~, ,f il A()61 i C4I Lie 1.:1%,1., I 4 at ; ke t I Nd I] 3 r .11., 11 i Si r Wli 1 ' ii. ' 4441' able portion 'di- - blaine- yeti aid ljave been'attached, to herToyal Hu ' WnITBREA'n denied that he had imputed, blame td-the-Prineelleger.t.' Had het een•s , :i Un wise as to act thus, the Noble Loed ought interrupted him ; as he-had not done so; but uuw .accused hiM, he blight 'to mhke it meniary proceeding: . He sppealed:t6The Spe:tker. if he had been-guiity, of what was' asoribell' him. Tlle ' 'SPEAKEß , obserVed, that was noW . fitthat the Noble Lord should infer What he chose to state upon the subject ; it wmild then be for .any other Member. to propose ivliatever course they thought ;groper. • Lord UASTLERENGII repented his : statement, and added, that' , the attack upon the Ptince , , appeared tO'bhn to be the r.rors'e, being made iu his ab sence. He did not 'NVdi to impute the design to the Honourable Member, but he declared ‘vhat be .had uttered to be the impression made upon his mind bythe view of the Hon.-Member's.whole argument; " TIaI(NEV, atter his Hon. Friend had denied any intention of the sort, akcd 'if it was the Noble Larr's desire to affirm that he had so in- -tended to attack the Prince . For his part, and he spoke without partiality on eitlior side, he Was tree to confess,, that he did not - remembe.r.any expression iyhich bore such construction. ", Lord CAS7LEREAGII said, the Honourable Gen tleman liad riot denied atilt the faerence drawn by him tVaS correct. Mr. WHITBREAIi again- declared, that in any , thing lie had Said he had no.dispositio„ to attack the Prince Regent, ana theNOhle Lord was t»iS taken in drawing that inference. Lord'•cAsTmEttssort professed himself satisfied with this disavawal,, and then proceeded to ,the question before the JliMse... lie called on Parlia; ment to look: at the Ilonotirahle Member's sition, and see if they could agree with it upon; anyprinciple consistent Nvith expediency or los t ice For, what was it tlia• this. elnimpion of the liberty of the press .asited them tO do for the Pur ,pos.e of..rindicating the Princessof fronias persions sari had heed cast v4)olt 16. 7 - 7 . why truly atthd distance of about it.o'rtnight to Ira nisirtvo newspapers for hay ingpublished the whole evideoeF on amatter of so much i t crest to tiu•Lcou'n. 4 try. Ile contended against adopting such a course. that . thedis . closUres made were dirt painfnl and di4gustin!,; ; he wished they had never been, Seen, but7btCause they werii . called for . hy those Ivho 'both inand , ont of Parliarne.nt had begun the. system of diselOitires. They. kin 4 the other do.- contents were not in the hands of thestate., bnt of others ; and tuat it was not, possible for them to . select for publication only such parts as suited their w:vii purpcises instruments ; either against men in,ti,at House or agidost persons nut Of it. rl ktiew well that this was not in their power, and that though they might;hegin (as they 'had begun) . ,a system of disclosure, it. was not likdy they shOnlclbe able to stop short withe they pleased. After. the Hon.. iNieniber's not And nil speeeh , !Attie ifiuse look at the conclusion to which he come, to' take tip these two papers; 'fol.' the purpose prosecutiag titettl. wit this charge a . proofpf'the eih;et attf.uoed any, attempts on their parts to interfere in this Matter 7 The lion. Member; wih ,all his knowledge of bit siness, and of tiles extent to which the ! could go in milking chaff es, set out with the de -1 ; sign to bring Lady .Douglas to trial. for ; but, after ,long •sp.eeches, with his own partial comments uptin every thing, he condludad with a . motion so ridiculous; that it coul4 - .hbe meant for no- .thing else but a 'vehicle. to ihis harangne.—Viedr!) The Honourable Gentleman professed that his ob ject was to conciliate; in his : opinion, 'all lie had said Or done this :night -Was of fin opposite ten dency: aitilUovV;after stirting Up the evil: as much as , he conld,he 'was , compelled to shelter hiloself in retreat.—(A laugh; Whittead haying ifit his ,place, and being on his way, tawards the Bar But what was'the line of arguthent phrsued by the Honourable IV)ember itrorde,r to,get the I-louse to agrce , with hint in the propriety,ot prosecuting these papers ?, the course anis whole speech, ; he '(Loril '0) thought that 'instead 'Of illustrating the triumph of the Princess of Wales,, his intive exertions were directed to try, the four Noble Commissioners.who had Conducted the Inquiry He put it to the candour of the Hon. cThitleinan ::Whether. tie :ought , not , to 'have cniployed Lis (Sir S.Atomilly.), on this business, he 1 having assisted, the fotir Cominiss'ioners,„-and acted as their confidential Seci'etacy—as it- had '.been his duty to take down the depositions of•the, witnesses, to read them to the parties, and to take Icare that they;Were legal, correct, and Just. H It was 'a pity that Hononrable,and Learned Gently!. man was not in his place to contradict the statements"' of his Honourable Friend, and the Moreqtd, as4he Learned .. Lo`rds iniplicatell in the saute ch?Wgi.., Lords Ellenborongit and • Erskine, WeL:e from their situation, as .Peen s, precluded front .the pOSsibility of defence. It was not for him to discOss - the merits of these noble Persous,nind rite L‘earnedGentleman w - hOwaS,, attite period alluJed te, Solicitor-General, neitherwaS it for him, to' j. talter . into or pronounce a judgment upon these de , Nish ions The House was incompetent t ithisduty;' it was not within the stopeof their . functions; and, I.in - his opinion, vi'liatever the honourable Member might think of 'it, neither the act nor the attempt was,calculated to produ6epeacein the, country, or tranonility in minds, which deseryed.to be trampti 7 lized.:lthe Hon. Member had, on a former night, charged . hint With having pr(inotmed a . sentence . 1 of acquittal upon the Princess Of Wales. 'This hi had never done. Asia gioisw of the Crown, or as a Member of Parliament, he was not competent - to'i)i'onotinc'e any s'entenee Upon hc.i. Royal llfgh; He n's a Meniber of the 'Cabinet', had given an opinion upowthe subject,. , to widely opi ; rriori he had invariably adhered, 'and declared the sante in that 'louse., when on a Kite disc . :U.3Bkm- he , i said, that theyAtlie Cabinet) had. before theta pa ev id ence , Aga i o st the Prink.ess, which MIS Mit Sn it. ritority CiOlitra'dietlM, Or froillsCrtaiii 'Clit!sqS not,entitled to credit. This ecitrviction.-lie 7- still in a intitirtekl,:andt he-also remuit eiLol. ii)pinionT that the Princess of %Vales should continue under re... t reglrd to the ,visits hi=t. da'. t t ‘ liter ; -but, not. 'fr'orn any ,Irtipniation Ulainctly t 2 ,ble tindOS,rdOiL as 'O4 xis any.ftinetiOnS uluien didd - not 't dot% to .In' he Portlarrd.Ciabinet there Itadibeen no exercise of judgment oir the guilt or innocence of .; theptincess of.W bet t he, delivery.of an opi oihthe dOcuhi,hits i before them: They ,khev the law better tli in to pronounce such sett-. - T,tence..• P,Very, Subject in'tii.e realm had aright. to ,be eches'ider'ed innocent, till guilt was proved in ' 1 due cotirse of law. If, instead (4 Coining to a con eltisiet. that no fiirther proceedings w e re c alled for, they - h•ad thought that she ought to be tried -for treason, it would .nor, 'even in that case, have been a jiidieial sentence to rob her of that wiliCh eVery other subject poSsessed—the_right 'of being deemed is docent tot proved guilty. Here the 'So .ble Port! tilluiled •to the minute of the Grenville Cabinet, to the principle of whic) - 1 the seceeeding Cabinet had -adhered—hot tryiog the Princess , in a judicial sense, hot looking at the documents he fore them, in order to advise whether not further proceedings ''should ht , instituted. Upon this they came to the decision that it was ihexhedient, and this being the,Cuse, it was indi-yensable to justice to have recommeieled that her Royal Highness 'be receiNcd at Chun, .since, a cchttr;tvi coere would have subjected her to thsnspicion guilt upon all the grave matter of charge urged 4-,, , ,inst her, and upon v.hich it was thought !hat no proceediogs: should be instituted. The Ho noiwahle Member had stated that they must conic to -a decisive step—and whr t t was the decisive ..teat he advised them to take ?—to prosecute two ..Newspapers %t eat not ne me,hu Uy the,. he think it necessary to institute.. this. trial for Abe . purpose of proving the imiocence of •the PI ineeSs of Wales ?: %Void(' a mock - trial of this 'nature have that• effect ? The .very idea .was alisur(l. With respect to recent examinations ,alluded to bythe Honourable 'Alember,,he, would neither admit or.deny that such examinations were going oh, He had on the other might declitted an swering the LlOnourable.Meniher's.questions, till he knew if the Parliamentary course he Meant to • pursue was righttoldproper. Nothing thathchhad heard front hinethiS night liad satisfied bite that in propriety oi' wisdom, he ought to depth.t from that deterthinatiori. would therefore, not kniSWer the qttestions of the Honourable .A.lember, but he would Say, with perfeet decoruth,hhe , would not answer•his questions as to v% hat hanpeneti out of, that House. Ile Wotild tit t submit fais.public-i.!ow= duct, or as a•Minister Of the Crowil i to he cate . chisthl ,hy the , *Honourable - .Member to see if he approved or il-isapptoYed, of its . He Must lay' Parlianientary grimnds `for his propositions . , aehl on the: present important occasion, thot.,, , h on matters of minor con4egitellet:, it might be con- . venient for the 'dispatch of business to 'allow in courtesy of qtieqion and answer, he saw enough Of this subjat tti resolve him not` th rehas:. 'rhe Hoponrable Geritlenfau had said, that in his...,opi nion, Parlianietitotigltt i,titertere to giee the Prineess. t.protection of rhe his part, lie kneW of nothing that . deprit•ed het' of this pro- tection.lf any proceedings were instituted against her, ihnnistbe through, the law, and she .wotild have all, ththprotection of the law. Bet now. it w not the law, but a defence of clamour that was set ep•—the worst . defence thatconld ,be devised. lie was sure that every protectiow the law could WAS., desired tulle. extended to her on all y a , sides, and b ll patties interested. 1k wold not trespass longer upon the attention of the Hous.e— he hid "said enough to put Parliament upon its „ , -guard tigainst going further into things in which their interference could he prodwctiVe of no gooti; '•and Must create further ,lertneut In the public hibui. He dicl expect koinething better - frouithe. Member, who was so inual : ettuched tO!the liberty of the press; than a oiotioti of the kind he had Jost oiferetl. Ai all events, if that llouour able Member were determined to make a'saerifice, it odght to have been on a liberal scale . , and he -ought to have prosecuted all the ,I . eiv::papers, and not selected two which had beep . tai•dy in resort ing to Pnblicittions - on this „subject. ile con eludedTbystating us his ;opinion that .Parliatacut coital not, interfere with any ,prospect oladvantage to justtee,', or the repose ain't ti'atitiiiiiity of the country. Let fhein look solo i erly zo the state of th'e , qite;tion, and riot allow their ppssions' to be Misled by the Hon. Memher. Instead Of their agreeing, with hinh, they would take no stethek cept they Saw that it wmild,he ii i t the tvelfaie and peace-, of the country, and with the' honour and . d4.;oity of piirliantent. Ir. roNsoNyri stall he must confess that some parts Of the speech of Unit: Friend (Air: Whit. bread)...had .very„ much surprised him. - Till this, 'time he 'had oot 'been aware that any blame-was' itnnutahle to the four NahlthCotninissioners who, had gone into the Inquiry ; but if what . the-Hon: Gentleman said "was true, he could • not . acquit theta of blame in subinittint to the ,Crown dep0 . ...- sitions not, warranted by the:evideuee. tie could not impute a greater bknre tha9 this, is hick he might call ajtulicial forgery. But he trhsted his • Friehtl . s zealthad been deceived by the per son whO put the Copy of Mrs. Like's evidence into his' hand, and that it wohld . 'he. found the four Conun;ssioners hail donethe most ample justice to all.• They were till Peers, and be was sorry to say,' could nut in that place answer for their]. selves. liehadalso to lament that his . .Learned" Fried (Sir S. Romilly) had eptirted the house previous to the charge lade; 'because he tests sure • if th e e . eire was such as represented, that Learned Person must be as culpableas . any of the Noble Lords, But Ife felt a.petlect, reliance on their knowledge an di probity, and was sure they had submitted nothing tolhe Crown, but what was warranted .by . the evidence they htid eaten. With regard to the motion, he Would hive it his tupport, o but for reasonS.diaerent train those of the Ho ', nourable .Mover„" lit, beliesed no man Would sevt that he had interfered improperly, of it all iii thennfortunate this. ensigns Which subsisted in the Royal Ili!' Lad viiihCagainst the titles-. tihO the otlfer night, and wouht.this night have , voted: hgfiitistth'e question •for the trihl of Lady Done-las hailithee - lir 01 But it hat s'. i ," n the .liresent, Morton? to - proseettte certa,n , It' Ghntlenien on theother side thought all the Printers ul who had Cottin-itted offence,..NhwiSpapers should be in he ivad noohjeetiort to *the proposition st.) • ex- .1 teuded. • lair. BATH 1111ST-51,41, the Right Hon.flentlentan. Al4l — 'eerte.inly-,t4en a very teu didet view of the question from that urged in itsslipport by the Ho. „ tw oral?) AlnVer, And : had 44.gkied .w it Ir soine s (if 'reason. fie Would not •e,.t•cr 'Mt° that - Soil. Gentlentan''s attatk — tiptin :the .four :Peer : 4, but merely notice that the Whole course of hisi.speexh led to aconclusion to which in a parlianientary :View that speech, had not the slightest tefereace, When the Honourable Gentleman. talked of a crisis, his motion had little inure connexion ;with it than the motion for t(ljostrine..ent. For would he the result of the ; prosecutions he pro posed to institute liow could they accomplish his avowed-. object.? . BeSides what were they for —nom t fur calumny,. as the Newspapers .were not the IsithOrs ofthe documents. offence, .it seemed, in the eves of the 11 0 q. Gentle man, that they had pub . kshed the- whOle and not partial extracts., to prejudice the public lit any way.. Their "cinly 'offence was that of : presunt ing to publish all the evidence, ltud, if Convictod of this, wisat could it do towards justifying the yrincess c,c 'Wales ? These documents were, not the inVentions of the Printeis ; they might 9 . !tee lit 4e been published by. the rrin of cess Wales berse4; and if they had beet s s O isa4lished in her defence, the anthor would then have: be to cipoilly lia,f4e with those it was now Wished ;is. punish. These papers too, were tnatters •of • history, and not productions il - girte;i for party or of /PAN poses', 10.gratify.filacipity, • or coavey mischier 7 ous impressions.''*Tice Lit st door to these iinbl,ca tions was opened by those who printed .ttie • •.‘ a4eb • , step, it was not to s h-:.!. wondered at that persons po:.sesion Of the whole should fitel.themselves at, liberty to inake it known to the public, upon ,s ham a false impre ss i on ni , glit belt - lade, by the pr;»unlgution of partial extr4tcts. Under an the* circumstances of the case, he consid , :Ted laying the whole IKfore the public 'to be 'no,,offence.• . Lord i\lit.Tox took{ the same line of argument widt t IR , last spcake , e, but one. Ile con4fiercd ene high situation of the parties of eeted by th.ese pub-' lications to be a sufficient ground for their prose ctrtiOtk i ~and 01 . 2,;,0“ an illexample would. be .4t(o ‘vere they . ; anti,ered to . escape with inintmity, ;iftt. , r committing so grow a breach. of corliat. . . . . . . .. ".\:r. CA,tyrwßio nT conceived that nd good tould remit, in this instance, from Parliament.ary in tererefice, Ile lamented the nature of these pub lications,. hut . hlattked thow . e whose first pUblica tion of the Priiniss'sletter had tiece:isirity led, to .them. • I-le.. linveu. these would be the last, dc. it ,it i irnpossilife, to see that any goydeould,Fesult from tlJem. t r.:::yritr.ift.s.:arlinowledged that he had read these_ papers not-only-with pain hnt with grief ; hal. he had read documents equally disgusting in other. papers, . and in some' of them before iast i*-..;aturday. lint he rose to speak to another point. He ro,e in consequence of an attack on the me nory of an illestrioterifriend of his, the revered and lamented Pert;eval.. .When the Mover took . merit to Itiniself :for not doing ju:.;. 7 Tice on memory of that virtuous 'hen he talked of /..nirinz his character by not drawing a comparison between leis conduct on a,. tanner occasion, and that of the Ho minable, • Gentleman himself - now, it mtas oarlev possibh to listen to ,him with patience and inotieratiim. Mr. Parceval had undertaken to su, perinteral a Bonk containing the evidence in the - caseof the Princess of AVales, for her nes*,ond it as her advocate• he had omitted. any passages, to what would he have exposed her and , I—to the charge of hating omitted and withheld parts,of the testithony, mid thereby in- Ai - dictated the wwhole.. He believed that this was We first time the mention of iunnorality had ever , been connected with the ,:qtame of Percevai, or that he had been accused of disregard .to the Cencies of • life, Who had been so'emilieut an eit ample of respect to .theta all. liat.did the 1 - 10. nourilbk Gentleman mean to say, that as the Ai n - - cess-of Wales's Courisei,in an -,appeal she was abut t to Make to the public, he had any ennicein entering - or abt r idging the evidence on which that appeal was founded ? And what was the letter Which had -been called tbreatepiagi" It was written upon% the- supposition that by. ,bets exclusion fiwi t 'Court : being enforced, sanction would ht. conferred not only ulion the charge of levity, but - - upon the More serious accusations which been brought against the Princess—that she ought not to - acquii;see,in this ignominy, but awllurd the pub, • lka an opportunity of judging Of her conduct.—, Ought Mr. Perceyal in this ease to have garbled the evidence? Even the lion. Gentleman, with all' his predilection for garbling,. woald scarcely say that ought to have been 'done.. It a li,ne .had, • been suppresSed,: the argument would have -been against the Princess. He . deeply deplored that her itoyal. Highness had not. such ativThers now as she had at that time, ,It would have bectr..werl, for her sad tiir the 10)4 ; and her defence would, ,i not have fallen into such injudicions hands as into those of the Hon... Gentleman this night., :it Was ,trkAly said, An open foe may prove a curse, imprudent friend is woit.e.' • • (4 laugh 'from the Oppoqiiipn .bench ' i w as glad to iwe nom. , ,c,„ientleinan so jocose now. . • He had tried to be.,..yery , pathetic hi 4, speech, , almost tpupting..him (1.1;r.5,) to take out his, handkerchief,- anti beguile himself v ith the,.. idea that there .1 . 6 s really. a tearin the Honour able Gentleinait's • ;le. His present Met proved this to he a, mistake, .Not. being rithetic„ he might by alloweWfo the 1'1:d:1111W-1 torr argument of the Ilonountlde hat turned entirely on this, that: the of Waie' list not now ix ,aetplittal. 1k ridiculed the kni ;lit-Crrrtntrr of evidence to he rev 5% i‘aporateil..in all te t choupon two Eilicors. As for thitt Lielonged to the lr,ttit.elil l vail.writ-; teat tot the Prinveti.,s; anti rend to the I.lfA i le., Ite, (Ih% ,s,) did not see,. all„ tha,t,ctmeiliiivory fentKr. hi if. To him it looked niore like a ..triumpi l ,, trx‘ Nv,lllt. fixed passed in-that House. Jlnt hitt fthielly ;- relinquished the subject, 'havingftllttll4l the ob. jeet tar which be rose, •to Vinditte frwii the as persion of waut.of a reeoncillatory spiy,it,fn,:t‘tixtt wait and in Mr. I.'erceval, 110,4 4 ,.„ . •self ornament to titrgoikitigal - iii SANIUEL ROMILLY 'ant,. that he understood .thatrigniccirtmiristatti - x4 which had occilyred since he hid let) - the House,. rendered explanation on