The Sun. — London, England, 1807-06-06 00:00:00

-.- ~~._- --T LAW REPORT, COURT OF KING's BENCH, TaNz44. THE KING V. DANIY.L LOVELL. Mr. GAtutow moved the sentence of - the COurt ripnthe — Delendant, who had. admitted Judgment " to 4 . 0 by defiult, on an information filed against him for a Libel upon Peter, Cazalet, Esq. a Co ' .p.irtn,Y ill the firm of Messrs: Langston, ToWgood, and Co. of Clemetit's-lane. The affidavit of Mr. Cazalet stated, that the De 3 lendatit-was. an insurance-broker, and ltaing re instroalions ffoinsa tureign house; of the name Provitte and Co. in Coe year 1794, he presented a pol'cv upon a 'cargo of sugars shipped in the Darne :\ I , tr!ha, for the signature of thrpefndant.' With tin: request Mr. Cazalet complied to the extent of 500 i. The cargo of the vessel, in its way to this cotintry,Jeceived damage„! and an average loss,was claimed of the. persons who had underwritten the - policv, - by the owners. Not , of tbose - whose names appeared upon the instrUment, satisfied the demand, among whom , :vere the executors.,of the Prosecutor's h: - other, llr. Cazalet., When, however * the Prosecutor was called upon to pay hid propor tion upon the sum which he had nnderritten, he . *refused to-satisfy the . claim, assigning as his reason, -that a settleinent had takvp .place between him and a Mr. Dubois respeeting the insurance, and that his name ought , to ha' - e been erased from the policy.-=- 13y this non , coMpliance; the Deten_dant conceived, that the house for which headed was injured, and a correspondence was entered into bet Cveen him and the Prosecuti ; r, ,thelbrriter Ahinking that Mr. Cazalet only Imployed the alledged_settleMent as a pretext to avoid the payment of the average: After nu . tnfrous letters had been written by both parties with out any ultimate explanation being given, the De fendant addressed the following Note to the Prose cutor ' - - " Six--Previous to a geneial circulation of the inclosed Papers respecting the insurance,•( think it proper to send one )or your perusal, and shall wait •for your reply until Fiiday next. . _ _ • " I am, Sir, your humble Servant, " 78, john street, Fitzroy-bquar,... " D. LOVELL:" o;ie of the inclosed papers alluded to in the above note appeared 'to be in, the form of a hand-bill, 'which had likewise been inserted in one of. the Daily Neirspaper3, and purported to give notice of a sale by 'public auJion; if not disposed of sooner by pt iv Ate con traci, at :Garia way's coffee , -hOuse, on a day 'mentioned, of a'claim of 1461. 2s. exclusive of intere,t from the year 1794, upon Peter Cazalet, Eq. Atter stating, at length, the nature of the de mand, it concluded with the‘foliowing expressions: " The above claim arising out of a policy of insur ance upon a foreign merchant vessel, settled by all the underwriters but Mr. Cazalet, who has hitherto. evaded payment by resorting to the meanest subter fuge and chicanery." The other papers contained in the-note were general printed, statements of, the na ture of the transaction, representing the condu'd of the -Prosecutor in a light highly derogatory to his character: • . The Court ern - inked What were the words charged to be lillellous• ? And. it was answered, that the words charged in the information were, " who has hitherto evaded payment by resorting to the meanest subter fuge and chicanery." • • The affidavit of Mr. Cazalet likewise contained various other letters, written by the Defendant, to 'different Gentlemen in the:City, which. also were intended' to injure the Frosectitor in the opinion of the world. One of them, in particular, was ad dressed to a Gentlemen of the name of Weston, in i,vhich the Defendant; after having given a general outline of the transaaion, wrote as folloWs : If Mr. Cazalet thinks to vindicate his innocence by his fortune, he Will be 'most egregiously mistaken ; but ,I know full well that lie will preserve his fortune at the eXpence of his honqur." The affidavits of Mr. Joseph ;Kay, the Solicitor for the prosecution, and Mr. Peter Hyatt, confirmed the statement made by 'Mr. Cazalet : • ; , The first affidavit read, on the part of, the De fondant, was his own. It entered much at length hito the general nature of the, transaction, and tra-: versed the statement iitido by the Prosecutor. The. - obje&-of it was to prove, that no-settlement had 'been .made by Mr—Cazalet with Mr. DuboiS; but, on the contrary, that the average loss upOn thesurn un.:erwritten by hire was still due to the house of . ~ ' Provitte and Co. . . . . .. _ . Affidavits were likewise read from James Dubois, , Esq. and Mr. Wm. Cazland, to corroborate the statement made by the Defendant. The ATToitsEy GENERAL telt it .a painful task to address th,_. Court on the part of the prosecution.--- It wOu:d, however, be his duty to take some.ob- , . servations upon-what the De:'endant had said, what he had written, and hat he had sworn ; -for they w were all contradictory to each other: It' thOLearned Counsel might be alloWed to judge from the con- dna of men in the Ordinary intercourse of life, he must sappose that Mr. Lovell had a deep iflierest in _... . the recovery of' this' money from Mr. Cazalet, for hG was sure' that: no good man would have conde-: ,:ieended 'to conduCt himself as the Defendant had done; and he was r °minced that none'but a bad man, .-unless he had been granlyinterested,• could have ventured ,to, place himself in such a situation. It appeated.that a policy had been subscribed by the Prosecutor, and some others, and in consequence of a loss; a demand thade - tipdh"fhosei.cho had un derwritten for a per . centage. This claim Mr. ta zalet had. 'resisted,' on the' ground' of a' settlement with a Mr: Duboi,, about mhich there could be no because, happily, it was in writing, and sigued",by that Gentleman. In favour of the De-. ,fendant, Mr. Dubois was riot unwilling to go as far :!:1 truth would petmit o , in the at: he had made. Even the libel, already published did not seem to have satisfied the mind of the Defendant, fbr in the , yeAr‘ i 804 he professed"his intention of publishing ,t;uch calminny as would g'ffecttially ruin the charac ter of the .PrqSecutor. The.present information was not 'exhibited for the purpose of injurin g ; in the •-•iniiilest degree, the Defendant : although Mr. Lo v,..q, object, vas to • . t.raduce the Pl'osecUtor, Mr. .azalet's to vindicate his own, without as el'4,n44 daratter of another. - MreCwlßow, on . the same side, contented him this single observation " The 7 1t4A , aggrav)iting fat in this case was, , that,after th e De..4eu,iaut found that he could not enforce his ~• - - •, I ' LON DON : Printed by Ric"! A R )1) . H ARRIS , o f No.. 4 , Martlett-court, Bow-street; awl ptib,i,i)ed by WILLIAM AR:wlbe R SCRIPPS, it Swath Niolton-strcet, Grosvepor!lgtUre; tte - Sini-C.hvicts No. Hi:, Strand; where Advortisements, Qrders for the I,'afrer, I etters for the Editor, &c. (post-paid), iuust be addressed. mand in a Court of4ttstice., - he resorted to the ex pedient of attacking the, Prosecutor's-charaCiter, to extort pfiyatent by intimidation." Mr. 'FADDY wished 'no *more than that justice: shoull be done to 'the Prosecutor. FrOm 'the year, 1794, to the present time, ;Mr. - Cazalet had been sttbjectto the libels of the Defendant, a,specimen of "which had been l'ead to the Court -14 . a letter to Mr. Weston. The offence offered to the ProSecutor had been public -and all that was desired was, .that the vindication might be as public: as the aspersion. Mr. DAMPIER contended, for the Defendant, that at least there existed gt probability that no settle- went, with resped 'Co the policy, had .taken place; for it — was the known custom when any payment bad been made, to strike the name. of the Under writer from the policy, whereas lib canciation of: it, wish respect to,the Prosecutor, appeared upon - the. face of the in t stitiment. At any rate, it Was evident, that a claim did sexist, and in.the opinion of the .Learned Counsel, the demand for the payment was just, and the,refusal improper, especially when all the co-subscribers had settled , the loss. The-con, duCt of the Defendant was not to be justified, but he hoped there were some circum,tances of mitiga tion,7` Lord ELLiwaoitou4r,-- 7 -"To be sure, it must not be endured,- that thy` tnan sh3ll . be drien to the payment of any demand, which- could not be en tOrCed,in a Court of - Law, •by the lash of a libeller. I..ct the Defendant stand committed, and be brought up on Saturday, the 13th instant." • JUNE 5 The Court was occupTed the earlypart bf the day in hearipg.arguinents upon special law cases, reserv ed for .that purpose ; the following of . which was the only one of any - public iwportance-:., MR. PITT's GOODSALL V. BOLDtRO AND °TITERS. This was a question upon a policy Of insurance, on the life .of the laic: Right Hon. William Pitt. The case stated, that Mr Pitt being indebted to the Plaintiff, the latterhad an insurable interest in his life, and effeced the policy of , insurance in question, with the Defendants, for the sum of 5001. for, the space of seven years, at a premium of 15 guineas. Mr. Pitt having died.within that period, and the Plaintifi's interest continuing, he brought his action, upon the .policy, to recover the whole amount ; - but previous to the adiOn being brought, the original, debt was discharged by Mr. Pitt's exe cutors. The Counsek on the part of the ,Plifintiff, argued, that, notwithstanding the original debt had been paid, the interest of the-Plaintiff still continued in the policy, and he was entitled to hisa6tion upon that - policy of insurance. . ' On other hand it was contended, _that the Plaintiff's interest in ;he. policy. of insurance ceased upon payment of the'debt; hy the executors previous to, bringing the action, and, therefore, ; it was un tenable. Lord ELLE 11011QUGH observedo hat the case stated did not contain some fads which were necessary to be before the Cburt, viz. whether Mr. Pittdied in solvent or otherwise--out' of what fund the Execu tors paid the debt—the nature and amount of it, &c. He•therefore wished the parties- wok:ld consent to turn it into a special verdi(..t, that all the Pads might be before them. The case. was accordingly post, potted for that purpse. THE EINS- V. ABRAHAM HEARN AXE' ANN CRANN. Our-Aeaders may recoiled . , that the Defendants in this case were tried and found guilty at the last Lent Assizes at Chelmsford ;- the man for as , aultlng a,girl of the -name of Harberton, with intent to-ra vish hei, and the . . woman fix aiding and. assisting him. A full report of the trial will be found in our Paper of the 14th March last. These persons were this day .brought tip to receive the judgment di the Court. After the report of the Learned Judge w h o tried the cause had been read, The Counsel/liar-the prosecution said, that no ob servations he could make ut)on, the heinousne s s of the, crime of which these persons stood convided, could add any weight to the report of the Learned Judge. Mr. WIGLY, for the Defendant, Ann Prann, said, that if the report was correct, of which he had no doubt, he had nothing to say in mitigation of pu nishment, except that this unfortunate woman had been already iwelve .months -in prison, during the whole 'of which time she had conducted herself with g eat propriety. • Mr. GURNEY, for Hearn, urged the incredibility of the story itself, which was so extraordinary for singularity. That the woman had been the object of abuse, he could not deny but there was consi-, derable doubt at the trial, whether Hearn was the guilty person. The poor woman's testimony was atmoSt incredible; he did not, however, mean'to impeach. her veracity; but it was possible she might have erred from the imperfect state of her mind at that time. , . Lord ELLENBOROIJGH—" It is clear the Woman was infirm in .mind, and that infirmity • was in creased by,having drank strong liquors ; and of that this Defendant most basely an cruelly took advan tage,ll - Mr. austice GROSE, in passing the judgment of the Court,' observed, - that these Defendants bad been convicted upon the clearest evidence. It was a case of such force and violence,. as scarcely ever happened to, any unfortunate and unprote&ed fe male. The aggravation was the, greater as to Atin Crann, whose sex alone ; shouldhave dielated other conduet. As to , Hearn, it was his duty rather to have protected than insulted an unfortunate woman, then under his care; and he, .had a very narrow escape of atoning for his offence by the fOrfeiture of his ilk .% " When ,we consider," he added, " the interesi of those persons who are obliged to travel in waggons at bight, whether as a case for publiC ex- Ample,. or of singular depravitY, we. are equally bound to pass such a sentence as will . prevent a repe tition of such crimes." ,' • The woman was then sentenced to three months impfisonment, in addition to the twelve months she had already undergone', , and the man to - twelve months further 'imprisonment in . Chelmsford gaol; , both to stand together in the pillory once in the Market-place of Chelmsford, within that time, upon a. tparket=day. • TUE KING, t'. .101!N MACKCOWLE. The 'Prisoner in,this .case, was brought up from Newgate, to be admitted to bail, having been Com.- mitted:by the,Magistrates of Bow-stree4, cm suspi -cion of forgitig Indorsements and negotiating . Bills, to,theainount of 440001. which had been sent, to Lon don by din'erent - Merchants and Tradesmen, "from Pisherton,. in Nottinghamshire, by the_ conveyance of the Edinburgh coach; and taken therefrom. It appealed ,from the. exaruhlations taken before the Magistrates, that about the 13th of March : last, ,the seitral Notes in question were, by Some secret means, embezzled or taken out of the coach before mentioned, and - many of them 'negotiated at diffe rent Bankers' in Derbyshire, Staffordshire, Chester . a d Nations other' places. These 'Noteslwere indorsed by a person calling hitngelli. Warren. The Prisoner wcs apprehended by Adkins and Anthony, two Bbw•istreet Officers, and was four or five times brought up and recommitted for fUrther examination. Fourteen or fifteen per Sons 'ere exa mined, but none of tberii . could identify the Prisoner as the person "who paS4d himself as J. 'Warren, and . .negotiated these ,Bills, except three, who could-only speak as to their belief. Upon these grounds he was Committed by the Magistrate S.. In stipport:ot his _present' 'application - to he : _ad-' mitted "to:bail,* the Prisoner produced , an affidavit, sworn by liitbsell, Louis Bologna, of Covent- Garden Theatre, Mr. - • George GriMaidi and his wife,, of the sarne", Ann Thoma - s, Susanna Stewart son, Letitia Harroway, and several ~Other persons, who clearly and circumstantially described the Pri soner to have' been in their company; or transaaing business with them in or near London, from the 13th of March until after Oe 20th, in the course of which time the bills in question had been negotiated in the counties of Stafford-and Derby, and at . Ches ter, and other places, upwards of 130 miles from London. Smile of these witnesses (Grimaldi and Bologna) had accompanied the-Prisoner one of those days to Woolwich, ..where they performed in. the .Entertainment of Pon Juan, at the WoolwiCh The- • atre. -Other witnesses spoke of. his drinking tea with them, ,going to the play in - the 'evening, pur chasing goods, &c. , at , snchtimes.as made it impos sible that he could 'be absent from London, so as to be able to go to those various distant places for the purpose of negotiating the bills in questiosh--At further appeared, that the Prisoner had been for many years in the habit •of keeping a diary, from which he was able to account for every moment of his throe. Mier hearing Counsel on both sides, the Court 'Considered it a case in which the party might be admitted to bail ; and the Prisoner was accordingly enlarged, upon entering into security, on' three several incli6tments, :himself in 2001. and four sure ties in 5 or. upon each indti;lment. CRIMINAL INFORMATION, Mr. GA R ROW, on behalf of Gen. Gwynne, mOved for leave to file a criminal information against Lieut. - Col. Richard Watson, now Major of a Regiment of Dragoons, for an accumulation of libels, and also for a 'gross and violent personal insult. The Counsel stated, that it unfortunately happened that General Gwynne was Presick - tnt of a Court Martial on Col. Watson, who, among other, offences, was charged with lanoffieerlike and .ungentlernanly conduel, in drinkin . g,in company with same oon,commisiioned Officers, &c. He had beeen found rsuilty upon "all the, charges, and suspended until his Ktojesty's pleasure should be known.. His Majesty afterwards confirm.; ed the sentence of the court Martial, and he 'got leave to sell out. This was the Only provocation Oen. Gwynne gave this Gentleman, who had, since continually - persecuted 'him with - the most gross and scandalous• libels, accusing:him of turning his b.ick in America, and acting as a traitor to his coun try ; repeating various opprobrious epithets, all of which were utterly. unfounded. _Rut ail this, the Learned Counsel_ said, his client .did, not mean to trouble the Court with, until a. few days ‘ ago, when he received a gross personal insult. He was. walking. down Oxford-steeet, conversing with a brother Odi, cer, when the Defendant.came up, and' pointing a stick-at him, said, in a loud voice, : “ you. are General Gwvitne, you robbed me of my property, by de priving rue of my commission, and ruined my fa mily; you are a scoundrel and a rascal, and I will go into this shop, and . pnst you fora coward." Mr. GARROW was then proceeding:to state more of the circtimstances, when Lord ELLENBOAO,U9H told.ltim he liad..--stated Pule, accordingy granted. . _THE,K.ING V.- BARNETT, ATTORNEY. Mr. MARRYArr applied to enlarge the time for estreatiwg the hall in this , case, The'Defendant had been convicted of perjury the Sittings after last Hilai-y Term, in' a transadion between hint, the Marqravine olAnSpach,•and I,ady:Granard, as men-_ tioned in a former Paper. The Learned counsel said, that immedizt,tely after his conviction, Mr. Bar nett left this country, and his bail .had not been able to learn where he was, ever since. They had made diligent search for him, and expeded he would surrender himself for judgment next November Term. The motion being in due course, the Court granted' a conditional rule. COURT OF CHANCERY, idea 5. cHuacif v. BARCLAY. This was an argurnenrupon, a Demurrer. The Plaintiff filed his "bill in this Court against the De fendar r, a quaker banker; praying a discovery of evidence and relief against a verdia obtained against him in an action of ejeelfnent, , tried in Cambrido - e shire, in which' he claimed certain premises, called Cambridge 4,eath, as a freehold. The bill, chared, that the Defendant had obtained a verdi& on .the trial, by fraud, so gross and criminal, as amounted to forgery, _perjury, and subornation' of perjUry, as Mr. HART, one of •the Defendant's Counsel, con tended the charges in the • bill amounted to• , ; 'he, therefore, trusted the Court would not interpose its authority in a case stated totleso,flagrant as amount ed to incredibility. Mr: HART contended, that if his Client had pro cured false or forged deeds and evidence at the trial, it was a crime at common daw,•and there pu nishable only. That if the Steward of the Manor had produced, on the trial, a forged copy of a Court floh, to chew that the premises were not free hold, but copy hold, which could not be recovered . . ;by ejeatnent, tbat .Steward vitas- sultea to-ail • dielmern at law, and thfit the - proper mode 'for tii ° Plaintiff . to proceed WAS .- by a motion for a Ile' ,trial in a Court of Common Law; .he_-tontende. d, I that it was not the practice of thecourt to, intertoe with other jurisdictions, as app ea r e d i n the case Johnson, the bankrapt, 'a , few days ago, where the Court refused to-interpose in his arres during h;S, at tendance on the Commissioners.' It was c o nten d , likewise,' for the Defendant; that this was not the case of an unfair verdict, obtained under art - is' sue direEted 'from this Court,_ where -it will alwai 4 grant relief ; .and; in some cases, even against tip Most fair and impartial verdict,. if a , party injur shall discover material evidence, subsequent to th° trial ; as where a party found a receipt. of his - 2'4' versark for the identical demand recovered 2100 him by the verdid, or books containing a clear ac: count of such payment. It was finally submittO ,to the Court, that the eminent atrornies,' Messrs' Lockart and Smith, concerned for the Defendant i 0 this cause, would not lend their names, to any anigi C proCeeding. The LORD CHANCELLOR stated, that the bill cow tained sufficient matter of equity 'fat relief and dio' ccivery, although, on his first perusal of it,. he lutclai l doubt ; and even if it had not contain,:d such mg' ter, he would grant liberty to amend it, in - a 61 4 where it appeared that forged and false. evideni:e was procured to pass a copvliold upon -the Judge:3o Jury instead of a freehold, to the injury of Plaintiff, who not `ordy suffered, hr the verdi°' again:it him, the '1055-'Of the land in question; - 40 1 likewise darnnes in an ataion for the mean rate'; under another instance of . the .name fraud, it- ap peared, that different lands were des , :onated by lb° evidence thus procur9d„Oom the . latids; compfised the declaration of ej:tament. It .was clear, said tlrc CHANCELLOR, that tire charges in the bill were trues as the Defendant had demurred to, instead -of an' i swering t ; the demurrer _admitting the fatts de' marred to be true. The. Defendant did net apper, at first to support his demurrer, but, by favour of the'Court; was - let in to re-argue it. His Imds-lv? disallowed the demurrer, and directed the Bill to. t) answered. THROCKMOIITON V. TODD. Sir John Throckinerton being an incumbrancer , with divers other persons, upon an estate, by mort . gage, and there being a . very tedious lawsuit re' speoting the mortgaged :premises, Sir John entered into a contra& with a*Mr. Todd, to - assign or made over to him all his right and. claim, binder , the mortgage deed, tbr a sum much less than that doe by the deed. The other creditors of the estate have obtained ,a decree fos the sale of the landS ao.d clividendS of the - original mortgager. Sir 1;0 petitioned - to be allowed the remainder of hi 4 debt), i over and above` the &uni paid by .Todd:to: hii -under the contraa, and that Tpdd may be .paid :of the dividends in question the sum by him- " 4 ' vanteci : to Sir Jahn. It WaS contended, :that ( 4 ! contra& between Sir , John and- Todd _wat; binding ,upon Sir . John, .acid that heshould have nO • furthe l. claim 'on the estate in di s p u te ; f or that his claito _was certain, although „stiisje& - tb of the contra& with Todd'; .ati4; that-his - ref - Pet -1 Y was only against.'fodd, had grounds equity. The•LORII C4A NC:F.1.1,3R said,to Agent, that he thoug - ht the int - end i t:d suit a,;;-ai , r ,Todd, by Sir. Johin,'...worbld -prove difficult ; Ertt - . granted so much of the prayer ot't he petition as +W. titled TOdd -receive front c.he - djeidentis tliestea, by, hinl paid under the contrae, with.ikbe.rt y - to.S 4( John to file his up- or; betive- the first „i f •Ailchaelmas - 1 4 fm; buebteifier. It was suggested by Sit - ARTHiJIC 'PIGOTT, ,a 4 SUCII libertysh.oillci - wttiont prejudice to the ?O . ' ceeilihgs of thecreclitor at lArge:-iirille'eStat.- • Sir Szt.murL tom-iLLi'lire'dbjeacci to the word!' " without preyudiee" rnak . ..ng any part (if the order; words which he said ‘i'ef-c- - never any other view than of creaCrs . soine construction adopted bythe Court, and such wordy wete rejeaed.. Still? NitiPS., -` • ' , . . . --....... , . . . . , CR AY?SlifiLl e j y •:: z 4. 1 , k ., Passed bk—ihe: intent;"Pettrs`,.. rt tom it' Co;` -Harirlr , Sly, tram Wat e rfc, , d ; Fikderendt.ncei; :—..._, ti or ,,r,h, vv ,,y o d:; Fair American, Davi,.-.4nacct. Baltininre l ; ..karvry i ,.• F'ci s nsott and Pour Broiliers, Pattctsun, from NOnyay„, • Sailo—the Ducken6etd, Dunbar, 6r, Siribgll% Am" Britton; 1:4 Mal tar; 14:-...11.-„ . Davidson, thr-Ardiangtil i -,llarYr Scrivener, aini Poulowl, Doug! .ti, jor S. l'4.,trsbury,n. ..., KIK; VS On.Tuealay last ‘Va§ safety delivered of a Scil and Wit. the -Lifty of Tiin)inal' Goodlake; E6 . q. of ,iknhiria.;•,:.oea', Wastage, in Berkshire, and only daughter. of. W. G. 11110.• Es 4: of Wadley-House: • On tiie4th iust. at Dover,. the Lady •oi 7 Cal..ita s in•jettlar": • of the Royal Cornish Miners, of a Son. MARRIED. ; -` . On the Ist inst. at Edinburgh, .Cliar‘ef 50krig, tic' countant, to Miss Tod, laughter of the . rale' Thomas 'l' o 4' Esq. of Drygran ge ,- Wiiter to the'Siper:— On Tuesday last, at St. George's, lanover-square.,:i'l speciallieence; the Rev. C. Savage, or.Kitc ston curn.Ricintionl, _Reilor of St. Maty.'Al4crnary...: l " 4;. . &C , to 6:lrs. Aylitfe, of Stirbiron Lodge,`Ktrigstoo m Sorrel,. Lately, at St, George's, l - liniover,stin:tre, Nri- Wi11 11144 Ed. 'Bradford, of.Wallingford, Ber4s, to Iliss • eldeSt daughter of Mr. Williain'Eat t le,' 13Ooksci:er, of inarle-street. . On the. 2.24 ult. at Edinbufgh•;,.the Rev. john Minister of Fyvie, to Miss Alargaret Touch, youngest tiatig7,: ter of the late Wiiliant Touch, Esq. late of His 41ajestY Navy. Lately, at Britford, near Salislaury, .the Rev.. Frank Ellis' Reefor of Long,COmpton, Warwickshire, - to Miss, lervoj ir daughter of the late Rev.•G.,T. jervoise, and sister t0.c. 014P Act jervoise. • DIED. On'Sunday last, at Clifton, ,the Righi lion. Lady A ri l Maria Pelham Cotton, daughter of the late, acrd sister to 0 present, Duke of Newea4tle, ' - • tb On Tuesda) last, James Wliitt;ngstall, .Esq. at 1 - lit-k0 'Herts. • On the'22d ult at Spittal-House, n parish--Of -Storeliot Gavin Haddow, Esq. of spittal, .in tire-69t4t.ye•tr of his a#' On Ihe zsth ult. at Abroatlk, the Rey, William Urv° l late Minister of the English C napei there,• 01) the aßth' ult. at l'unbridke Wel;S,' of a decline;'' Catherine Harvey, youngest dausliter of Samuel tiarvi' ,ksq. of Sanchvich. PRICE' OF YESTEI STOCKS RDAY, India Stock. India Bonds, South Sea Stock, Exchequer Bills, 3s. 2S. pr. Omnium„ 2114, Imperial 3 per cent. 62 Ditto Ann, • Cons. for U p. ring, 64! fa' Bank Stock, z 3; Navy 5 per Cent. shut 5 per Cent. 1797, Irish 5 per• Cent. 4 Per Ce 3 per , Cent. Cent. Red. 63 1,.• - 3 per cent. Con. van • Bank L. Ann. 17 i5-16ths Ditto Short. Ann.