The Sun. — London, England, 1802-04-26 00:00:00

ie.:o take.the whole case ;nto their cOnsi,?..er.ltiiiti, ,ecide upon the whole of it ; all doubts- upon • thit teatier, having been removed by the late ACI PAriatnent, pas,ed for that purpose. He ;n rin " 'ix:Red, that the doctrine of Truth being a Libel, origin :teal in the :itar-Chamber, where there was 411 • Jeterinining upon the Fact, and leaving to the ~.Cblirt 'are question of Libel or no Libel, had arigin also in die star-Chainber-- 7 -now, thank God, • abolished. That nu suds doctrine was to be found in. any of our ancient Statutes, 'from- the first of Westminster, to the present day, nor in any Law Book, of any authority whatever, except such as borrowed their dostrine from the Stars-Chamber, Arum the earliest dates of the Text Writers, down to the most modern Commentators upon our Laws. In all these good authorities it was constantly held ' that nothing could be libellous, unless it be false. That whatever was written, wish the true spirit of History, could not be deemed a Libel. 'He. referred to many authorities in the books. He maintained that the jury bad nothing to do but to pronounce on the Detendant a verdict of guilty or not guilty. That, before they couid find the Defendant guilty, they mnst, in their own minds, be satisfied that the Defendant was a person of wicked mind, &c. disposed to injure Lord Clare,, &c.—Unless he wits a man of this mind, he could nut be guilty, , for all . guilt arose our of tie mind of man—and to find him guilty, merely because he was the Author;would he fro i;,,rl a r4tige veidi4indeed : it would lie to' fill:.1 a man guilty or innocence. The Jury must, ,therefore, dive into - the mind of the, Defendant before they could find goiit ; had brought about him no ekternal maiks of 'it , for 'this' purpose - they Must take the raper and look at the winne of it, and then they were to say %Ai-ether tic afendant had that sort of guilt about him which was imputed to hiin 'upon the sate of this information i aod if they did : ry.;t, they were bound to find him 'oat gUilty. _ He had a complete answer to this charge, and be would tcli the Jury chat that answer was ; " That t he wh o l e of the two P.:pees which the. jury hat/ heard read, and which were cinTrged in the Information to be Libels, were written in the true spirit of History." Thar these remarks on the, condud or Lord Clare and the affairs of .Ireland, w ere an History of the Transadions ofthnt Country. He then expatiated on the use of History, which, he said, consisted..in re&Ctions on events, as well. as a recital of them; and commented On the paragraphs complained of; for the purpose Of shewnig that they were the re reetions of-the Historian, and not t he , calumny of the Slandeter. He had described some events in Ireland strongly, but that arose from the nature of subjed ; for many persons there had been tortured. Here he recited the discourse of Fortesque, Chan cellor of King Henry VI. on the subjea Torture, by way of sheaving the, inefficacy of it as a means to ,obtain confession, it leading men to accuse inno cence, &c. and maintained, that this idea produced warm expressions in any one who had to discourse of it. He then took a view of the effed of the Press, and the blessings'whieh, its liberty brought with it to the Community, anti maintained that the Jury could not convict the LYelendant in this Case, if the words in this publication were not - such as could possibly. have no, meaning but such as flowed holy) a guilty mind. That if the words were capa ble of another meaning, the Jury were bound to annex that meaning to them. The substance of his defence was this : " That 'this Publication was a Work written wish the true spirit of History ; n t faithful representation of what past in Ireland ab ut the time when it was published ;" to prove which, several Nnoble Persons were now in Court. With these observations, nathich might have had a better effect in abler hands, he should, leave the Cause to the Jury, conjuring them not to, proceed hastily to their Veldid, 6ut to give it the attention which the importance of it required. He was of opinion that if the Jury found, the,Pefendant guilty, they.. would, in some measure, saniftion Torture. This, he said, was a Cause which. involved the dearest Rights that Englishmen coUld,,possess. , He left the Case with them, and tie lipped they. would.give it the deliberation, it deserved, and deliver . such a Verdidas should be sailklasttory -to their own Con_ sciences, to . their Countrymen, and to. their'God. Mr. Snort . then proposed to examine Lord Cain den. His Lordship being sworn, Mr. Sco - t - .1 - pro. ceeded to examine him. Q. believe your Lordship was Viceroy in Ireland in the year 179,•? A. 1 left Ireland on the ztst or zzd of June, 1798. Q. Will your Lordship have the goodness to tell my Lord and the Jury, whether or not any Torture for the purpose of• extorting confession was noto. riousiy infikted in that Country.? The ATTORNEY GENERAL said, he was sorry that his duty compejied him to interrupt this exa- mination. .Nly Lord Camden need not be told, that he was to relate nothing but what was the Subjettt of Ids own knowledge, - He submitted, that in this stage of proCeeding, , or indeed in any stage of such a proceeding as this, it: could not be com petent to the Court to hear evidence.of this nature, for that was going into a justification of the libel. Supposing such a thing as Torture having been used by somebody in Ireland, upon some Ocea,,ion, . that could not- be given in evidence in 'justification of a libel upon my Lord Clare. • _ _ Mr.•justiee GROSE said, he. did not apprehend . that the Defendant's Counsel would attempt that. • The ATTORNEY GENERAL said, there was nut a word abont Torture in the information ;• and so the question was abandoned. Mr. Sc orr then asked my Lord Camdep,- whether his Lordship did nor know that therewasa. system of Coercion adopted in Ireland ? _ _ Mr. GARILO%V objeetect io this question, and begged that the Noble Lord . would - not answer it, until he had the leave of the LeArned Judge to do so. He was aware the Noble Loid, and other Noble .Persons now in Court-, were very desirous of en tering into a fll detail of the circuinstacces in trelatid to which this qucktion pointed ; and were this a fir and placimlte,should be glad, as the Public would he glad; to hear the recital which these Noble Persons would make, which .would, he had no doubt, redound as much to their honour as it .had produced - aZ4aotrige to their country ; but in a Court of Justice rules must be abided by and kept inviolate—to deviate from them would be d an _ gerous, in point of precedent... ...He must theretore resist this question, because no answer to it could Ise evidence. Mr. Justice Gaosit said, the question, whether a system . of Coercitio was adopted in Ireland, he did did, not know how my Lord Camden, or any other Person, could answer such a question. The Learned hidge said, the question was so general, that noboAy could answer it si-eciflealiy. - The Aremestey..GE74tx t, said, if the Learned Gentleman meant nothing more than this, to ask, whether there were such means used in Ireland, -as were supposed to ke best adapted to ihe suppression of Rebeilion, he would have rerajection to his ask_ tog my Lord Cabden any question whatever—but it he was to ask my Lord Camden to disclose the Secrets of the Privy Council, by declaring what advice my Lord .Clare gave, and the adoption of which-led to any measures whatever, such a course of examioation was not only illegal,. but likewise so-very improper, in other respects, that the fist and most prompt resistance to it, was absolutely de_ mantled from him, according to the sense he enter tained of his duty. Mr. Justice GRoSE said, he did not believe, that Mr. Scott would ask of my Lord Camden, a question with a view of calling of him tredisclose the secrets of the Privy Council.—Me. Scott would eecolleet, the Noble' Lord's.oich as a Privy Couocillor. Mr. Storr said, his only Objed in calling my Lord Calnden was this, that the truth of,'w;hat he had addressed to Itia Lordship a;td the . jury, " that the ptiblication was a fair history tut transabions, might aypear."—tie would ask. my_ Lord Camden to. sta t e w h at h e k ne w, indtverldent of his charac ter-of a Privy - Councillor, of a system-of Coercion 'tieing abed upon in Ircland'previous to Ale Hein breaking Out in that Country. 'The Arro RN EY GENERAL said, he / submitted' that a - question - to be propo.uoded to a Witness in a Court of -justice, should assume a more distinct share than this, befo r e i t c ou ld b e put at This was a, question which could .not be answered without detailing the whole-affairs of -the Govern_ meat of ;tat' Country while my Lord Camden was in Leland: -Mr. Justice GRO3E said, that the question must be much more definite .before it would be-legal. Mr. ScOlt-submitted, that what. my Lord Cam den knew as . -an individual,. he might disclose, but he would not ask him to say any thing he knew as a - Privy Councillor. Mr. GARR ()NY objected to the whole of.this ex amioatiOn. He . was aware that a desire existed, not in the Learned Gentleman who was of Counsel for the Defendant; but there was a desire entertain ed that an impression should be made on the Public by this examination, that if the Noble Lord was to relate all he knew -of Torture, and so forth, in Ire_ land, the Defendant would be acquitted. But the Matter should not be so understood. The truth was, that the Noble L :rds now present (Lord Cam den, Lard Castlereagh, and other Noblemen) were very desirous'of explaining this matter, but they could not be examined according to the Rules .of Law upon the trial of this issue, to prove what was done by others, Mr. As noT said l " That which is now propos. ed to be asked of my Lord Camden, was either done by the . authority of Gover nment , or not. If they were dpne .by the authority of Government, the Noble Lord can only know them -as a Privy Councillor, 'which,. by his owl, oath as Pivy Coun_ eillor, he cannot disclose. If they were done-with out the authority of Government, then time whole matter, be it what it may, is ,irrelevant to this issue, and therefore cannot be evidence.' . ! - Mr. - COTT said, hiS object - was to chew there-was znfoundation for the ;assertion which was made by his Client and to she_w that he wrote it in the-spirit of - an Historian. tie therefore wished to know o f the Learned Judge, whether he .mig-ht not put this question to niy. Lord Camden—Whether a system of Coercion, by means of Torture to- extort conies_ sign, was pradited in Ireland, whether. my Lord -Cairiden ?id not believe that such a system - took place ? and-then he should' propose, to, follow that tip, by asking if my LordClareapproved.it _ - Lord CAMDEN said, he was perfeCtly really to answer -that - or any other question_ on that. head, if he Was-pertnitted to do -so'. Mr. justice' GRosr said t that the manner in which Mr. Abbot -had put the objeCtion..to this examination, struck him to be very Aorcible.. 'He was of opinion that this question could not be put., Mr. GARROM contended that this question could not-be put, nor cou:d•any question tending to chew what system of coercion or otherwise had been adopted in Ireland be asked - of•any witness whatever. upon. the trial of this issue. • Mr. Justice GftosE said it was not necessa,ry for him to deck4e that ; it was enough for him to say that-this coestion could not be put to this witness. Mt. Scorr asked whether Lord-Camden knew that a person of the name of Shears was put to the torture in Ireland ? It was. decided that this 'question could not he put., Mr..SCOTT said, he had another witness to call. Lord KJNGSTON was. then .called upon his sub pceria : -his Lordship did not appear. Mr. SCOTT said, he had other Noble Lords who - attended as witnesses for. the Defendant; but the same 'ohjettions occurred in examining them, as had omer.ruled the examination of my -Lord Camden, and therefore he' should not oall them. . The. Defendant then made a speech to the Jury, in which he solemnly protested against any intent ' whatever, to slander the Noble Earl, but that he, published these observations, as his Learned COML. sel had said, in the spirit of au Historian with some little colouring, &.4- The ATIOAN,EI' GENERAL ,made an able . replY to- all the leading topics. brought forward for the defence,. but of whith we could not, withoUt tale. ing up too much. room .for.the Report of a Trial, give an accouot ; we: 4114 therefore proceed to ' state what was addressed to'lhe Jury by Mr. Justice Qgntletnen of the jury, After having heard so much at-yod have, froth 'the Lerned Cotinsel, on the one Side and on ,the other, I am sure that when you are to 'recollea what the simple 'question in this case is, you will not expect from toe that - I should detain, you' This is an Information filed by His Majesty's late Attorney General against the attendant, charging him with having traduced the We Lord Clare, and likewise' forhaving, by these publications, excited evil- mind. ed persons to acts, .of violence - against Lord Clare, a person of high rank in Ireland, and a Privy while my Lord Camden was Lord' Lieu tenant of Ireland. ,In the support of this Prosecu tion, it was necessary that these faas should be proved, "and they have been proved ; namely, that my Lord Clare was a person of_ high rank and a ' Privy Councillor ; that my Lord Camden was ',Ord Lieutenant of Ireland ; that this publication ok place at the time stated in tlie information i ; and lastly . ., that the Defendant published the Paper in. question ; and if he haspubliThed this Pa. per for one or other of the pUrposes stated in the In formation, as has been stated'to you, it is riot neces_ sary for you to be of opinion that this was publish ed with intentiok to excite. others to 101 Lord Clare. If you are only- convinced it was published with a view of traducing his chit:after, that will he sufficien t to 'call upon you 'to conyid 1.4 u on th.s ainatiOn. ..Iris nut necessary' that saiild read dl the in t.erial charges in this you have heard read inure than once. The 'ques tion is, Whether yoii are satisfied that the publica tion you have' heard, over and over again, is pi. is not . a Libel on my Lord Cia're ? A point on which, I think; no man of common sense, bestdwing ;my: .attention upon it, can form a doubt: The words to which I advert - now are these, " You say that the Irish Peasantry are vintiietive and blood-thirsty." Here -the Learned J l idge read the whole of the passage recited by theAttorney-General, by which it was said that Lord Clare's heart never over. flowediwith beneficence; nor head devised any coup. sel that was not cruel, .Bcc. ending with the ac .eount of the fate of the Duke of Buckinghini, and applying., t to the case.,•el my Lord, ; Clare, by saying, "'Perhaps the public hatred is not the, only circumstance in, which your case may be simi lar to his." " Now Gentlemen, read .and reflect on these words, as any cotnirion man would read relled.upon them,, and then task yourselves, whether they are or are. not, an aspersion, or intended to bean asper sion, on the charader of my Lord Clare and whether it is not more, or intended to be more, to . - excite those ill-mind e d o,r intemperate people,, into whoSe hands such a publication might fail, to do him an" injury With respect to the publication, it •is proved; more than in the common way, by -the person, who gives you the account of it, who tells you that he-saw the:Defendant set his name to the very papers that are/produced to you. To . he sure, a- clearer proof, or a more decided ad of ppblioa tion, cannot be _gi‘, 7 n. Why then, if you are sa tisfied that the Defendant Published, the next point is, whether there is a rational around for What you have heard stated on behallof the Defendant ? You are told that this- is•• to be considered as a true his tory of the transadions.it relates, to I Is telling 4. man that his . .heart never overflowed with benefi cence : that he never gave any tounsekhatswas not• cruel that his' mouth never Opened but -with 'mt-• invidiyelike telling a story, or giving a charrittr ? 7f it 'be like one or the other; then the Defendant is no guilty ; but I think yOu cohsider it a waste of-time in nle to liken - it 7 ro either of these cases. Whai then is' there iri this case on'be half of the Defendant ? in truth, nothing at all.— You 'are - to say, whether he ha's published- this in-, vedive upon my Lord Clare ? If he did not. mean to asperse :-the - - charader of that Noble Lord, I wood ask, 'what he Slid mean ? Could it possibly occur •to any man to publish such a thing this i without intending to libel the charac ter who was the 'object of it, after what you have heard ? However, 'all I will say is, that if you entertain- a- doubt upon the matter you should. find your verdid in favour of the De fendant: - 'We are fold the. Liberty of the Press is concerned; upon that subject I have had occa sion more than once to say, that the Liberty of the Press is best supported by suppressing the licentious ness of -Ole Press. But when a man of common fair reputatiOn cannot find a remedy against the: licenti ow:ness of the PreSs, for fear of eheckint , the Liberty of the Press, I think there will be an end soon of that veryliberty, and of every thing else that is valuable in Oa raeter;for so. it will be, tivtier► fair fame CiIII no protdftiolin a Court of Justice.. I do, not mean , to'petsuade you to any thing : aetoiding to your own common . fee,lin& and common sense. If you have any doubt of the evil intent of the Defendant, let the Defendant have the- benefit of that doubt, for that is the constant rule- it. -Courts ofjudic:utire ; but, if - as men of common sense- acid common feeling, yOhiiiave no doubt of his evil dien the god of rhe Countiy requirei you should find him'gtfilty. 'Mr..GAiRow said, that under die Libel Aa the Learned Judge was called upon to declare his opinion, 'whether the Publication in question Was a Libel or not. Mr. Justice GaosE.. 7 .--‘‘l am aware-of the pro vision of the At of Parliament upon Libers Ido not kohl that Lam bound to state my opinion: to the Jury in the way you mention, because' the Ael , says, that the Judge shall, at his discretion, ,state what his opinion is, to the Jury.—But now that I am called upon to give niY.opinion, I ani bound to say that I think this is an abtaminable • The same Defendant was tried for. another Libel publi . shed in the same NeWspgpet, reficaing on the Proceedings. of Parliament fur iVlartial-Law in Ire land, .and found Guilty. MARRIED. On Thursday, at St. Georges, Hatlover-square, William Treacig,old, Esq,. of 'Cliestertiold-street, to Miss Russel, of IfilMtreet, Berkele)-squ.ire. DIED. On the nth of Februaty last; at Kingston, .jamaie7a, of a fever, „Mr. 'Peter Thomson, eldest son at John Thom son. of Burntisland, North Britain. LONDON : Printed by .14,U;(2tiA NA N , tollio%y-Street, Coyunt-Waicti ) ; anti l'ublisned by WILLI AM Axi.4.l Gr: ft SCR pr 3, (of Horse, AL the SVI4..OFFIct. No. 1/2 4 4tritnd ; where- 1 41avertzsemiats; Ordirs . tar the Paper, Letters for the. .Edifor, (p..g.lta) SIiVP CR A.VESEND, APRIL 23. flora' Past hy;—the Eiizabeth, , from . Cartagena; ,- tersburgh Cum'3erland, —, from ianlaica.; thy, Willis, from Alicant ; York, Thompson, .from Pee ironi Lis'aur. and frwo --, from Ari iel. ' dam Acivatur Sailed—the Atias, Jones, for Venice F , rtit n ` ie, - for -Grenada ; Strenshall, Heslop for Viac entisi L. an-i H bion, —, for Watertbrci, ' or " burgh ; Britannia; Robens • ; Lai a tar;,, Elsinore. 4' It IL' IS 0 SiIli:A:J. SATU &DAY. Bank Stock Navy 5 per Cent. roji. roc • ; per C eht: 1795, lojt 64.0 Irish c pc; L7eht. ; per Cent. C'on. ; per Cent. Red. 75! - -„:1 Con. to z Dltt Scrip liAnk long Ann. 214 9-15 Ditto Short Ann. 54. 1-16 Ditto Scrip India Stock Exeneil."l;i!ts 75. SS. S. P reill ' i'lintiaine ditto prem. Exaiequer I;iUEter • Wew S. S. Stock - ()minim' helper. 3 per Cent. Ann: tlanl tin opening I nth a tor opening Cons9l.s for Account 770.2 THEATRE ROYAL, LIVERPOOL. NOTICE IS' HF.REIsY GIVEN, • THAT the present LEASE o f t h ese ?reliv e : • 4.:')e will expire, on' the rst of January next, and that op i.riiprietors are rea dy an d willing to receive PrdP°6als i. any Person or Person s i nc li ne d to treat for a new Lease. , e d, The Theatre is intcri.idd to be new-Modelled and eidarg.ri an explanation of which, togetrw'r with all Othe;* by' infortnation, relating t o C on di t i ons, &c. may b e knzsv l - .: ' aii.plying to Mr. I.ohn roster, No, 5, Newington -bridg e. Liverpool, 'Maids 24, tgo2. ESSEX: VI rTHE SALE o f t h e MANOR o f S O UTH BF FLI2ETand . JARVIS lIAI.L, with. 1.'" , :v0 aroT s Sold' :ed pirvisliall and Hopes Gree n - P arni, a d vert i se d to . 1 - - 3 1, r ii, at G'arraway's Cotree-bOuse, on Tuesday tlid 27th °1 f l ag '1802., is ukavoidably POSTPONED u n t il filit NOTI CE. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, •}i Mr. CHRISTIE, .• - At his Great Room in, • On FRIDAY, May the ph at T welveo!Clocki (for the ENDOW-NI ENT Of a PARISH SC HO uv . • BOLDRE, 'near LYMINGTON, HANTS•I, ltly HE- EX TE - NSIVE,_ \TALUABLE kind 1 1GS, .INTERESTING W COLLECTION of ketches, and gooks orDrawings. 'By the Rev. WWI. CILPIN, M. A. : Redor of I3oldre, Hants, and Prebendary et Saru ui rks irt! Tli&: 'greater part accompa n ied w i t h va l ua ble R"' j fs , the, iiiuStrative Of 'Picturesque LandseaPe Sceheq, iron , above Collealorl arc includedthe Original Dr4sv l A 'rcv o kk. which -the-i..llgravings w e re ma d e f or t h ose adrnire" the P.iduresqu.; Tours and Essays of , the Author. The entire amount the above Sale being desTgn'", t i o no‘ unc Charitable Purpose above mtnitioted, under.the dirc` - '•s t ..d to' se rat di.st/rig reserve.-••• F ti e w r( s )n u s ne wl l i v o i h b a c v without • ' • • NEAR LUDLOW, SHROPSHIRE. TO BE SOLD. BY AUCTION, ' . By Mr. CHRISTIE, At his Great Room in Pill/ MaII,. • On MONDAY; the loth of May next, at One A VALUABLE an d DESIRABLE ki t 0.- o' l ' _CI HOLD ESTATE,' consisting of a SUBSTA', A I3I , ' ELEGANT ERICK-BUILT MANSION., with 5 ,,',.45 , 'NG, kir ELEVEN HORSES, TWO COACEIIgu - ,,,cW,- : numerous attached and detached OFFICES - of e`;',! ; ',ilf , ' scription,. suited to a large family, excellent K ll , - 51),,C" ; GARDEN; Walled, and'riehlv'ldnted, PIN ERY a t ,; ( , ti O4 „" CESSION. TIOUSE,, MEL T ON GROUNI', PLEASURE GROUND, of near Six Acres, disl 3 P s- ilipe r TaSte, 'and liing e d: w i t h r i c h P LANTATIONST , lithed with - SHEETS of WATER stocked with i l l Or surrounded by...a Lawn, and sundry rich 11 - ,..lusuri i whole about • S UNE HUNDRED' and SIXTY-SIX ACR Tithe free, Land . Tax . R,therned, about too acr Meadow, the r est A ra bl e, about ac Acres of w hich q . '„l t waL•red at pleasure, by a River, in which a valuabl e Fishing,Fishing,Alt:lli:fitfully situate sAithin two miles 0, 1 , st seven from Tcnbury, a beautiful and Sporting' P ar ' , County or Salop ; and other Coaches pass dailY from London. OV e S :g7 • • A P.,•!rehaser maybe accomm o d ate d w i t h thereat I , OI(NITURE; LIVE - and CROPS 4 ,&c. at a fairs Valuation,-and immeziiate PP f i rt ibl 9 may he' had of 4 most gentleinanlike, as well :is P lO • thc • situation, A Person attends at the Mansion who - wih, ifiP fe.' t Estate, and Printed Particulars may be had of th e e of the Shrewsbury, Birmingham and Worcester ValL'" Y the A.ngcl Ltidlov i; and in ls by. Mr. CH , RISTIE is imp:Ai/erect to receive Fr°r °Sa • Private COntrad. 1 40 3 ' A. XTANOR, with a RESIDENC E and FA RM i . .,1,1; ( - )- • TYTHE FREE, and ADVOWSON,- ne ar U G .in WILTS. TO BE •sy st. N )L ir D :s ß c lt ic i i y i C , TlON, :,4 v e the ztali Garraway's, 'Change-alley, London, on Fr' - ` 3l ,.disP°' - ot May, at TWelve o'Cloek, in One Lot, exceP` A uf bcvAPprilaiteA- L Eittsa..arAbyit,E the m he , 3otliof A % - ir o il, of F ST KENNET T, :with the Royalties; Advowsont & , a rt • 4 . 1 santiy situate in a healthy', sporting, and faVottri t e thZ... County of WiltS, - on the bord:zr and withidhall 3 the Bath 'Road, 46- Miles from Marlborough, 8 ( N u ' oi 7 . 9 9 froth Devizes, 27 aom Bath, 25 from' SalisburyLiiionl. troia e: Loudon, comprizing a handsom, modern,. wo.,,11:: weli-erected *Family Flotise,* and Offices, spacious,,c,,,,-lig Garde!), „Orohard, Lawns, 4ce, witivsB7. 'Acres ef good Arable and Pasture Land, with rich Water l'" ro nicli t i , tic River Kennett , rtnming by. part of the Estate,' ing and enriching the Lands, part of which are iiicle.s`l2,,,rns, the whole.compad and adjoining, with Farin,-Yilf` l ',l l lt ( I ' s " DaVe-house,,•tinti ample Out-building-s, coos•tovosvi. tanceB; And six. Cottages in the Village. Also t ) s( l in and, Right c Patronage. to the. Donative or P 0 .0 ,0 Curacy of the Pari s h Ch u r c h o f E ast K en nett ; t lt , Ineumbctnt is middle-abed. • This intefesting Property eminently merits a , Th by plea, restdeuCe is judiciously seated in a vale su rniunde r nig and ya,r.ed . ;:ultiv at ed horn?, capable. 01 .1 1 . c P atet dating a - Lit';;;e and in a very' n eat state • fish er ,' in good . . order, he whole. forming a cornp l t g lees afiottn:fing w iii Game, excellently su pplied i ' 1 . ) 111 3 Tythe..Free, including also the great and siva ,vio g L a d , of the remaincLr of the Parish. The valuabl e g r l ia ic and Ash Timber will also . be included in the Pli„ r `,..idenci; possession may be had both of the 1"5 . • Zinn • ted • ' Th.: Bailiff will show the Estate (Sunda.!'s ex c l: Avr"' ci , ; * Printed P‘irtiettlars; Will b‘..reatly by the .14th ° catli tio rt the Castle, Marlborott4h ; the Bear, llzvii es ; or. ori g ; Wheel, Lahn.t • Angel, Chip penham ; 'Talbott ; bastle add Bait,• Bath; •Crow." , 14' ' a Pelican, Specniiani L an d ; 0/1 1.1.e _at' G'artaway's ; and • of* Mr. 'Scott,' Ludgate-li," Plan of the Estate may be seen two of jN(u):E o iiieeng P xi l t _:l l - eil ß t i - o i g i ------- n i, , i i n n W ti o ie rc c e o t u er n , t.y on l'hur' d4 t" C SOLD isY AUCTION, tl At thedll o• A t;i:on:Usieub:itli, n mous Sale o • duced . • V hin wt rich . Nleadow Pa rt ' v QitLTLIe, :it S. 1 : 1 : 1 1 :t sff i n t i o n , P n c ( r i t ; g . Garden, end Shrubbery neatly laid Out, and itbout tlyl4 1.1 5 ce re ster s to Co d' •t be the at i. e .o t r li:P he ro r p: a r r ty t : e a tt_ i i d ? lately i, been planted . vs, itli choi ce Fruit Tiees. Til e. • froo i L and, Ariniaes - the - TurnpikeLondoiwor - •are - „,k of ;ng Cololtil ceased. • r rs, apply to Mt IStril ' Liet►wn ty Wor,:este4 or anjv A • eoinans, N 12 and .F,eenoid, de sirable 131"44J' : te:rry,Naci, ,Westinins.ti r) . ; rd), must be addressed.