The Sun. — London, England, 1807-11-24 00:00:00

Pleas should try an appeal of murder upon a writ out of Chancery, that would be a great misprision. I Hal. 498. 1 Haw. e. 7 . 2.6. and c. 28. lib. 2. g 5.26. He shewed also, that Governor' ..Colonel. Pic ton could him no right or power to aet as judge in that case. • And lastly, he cited Cowper, p. 173; and. the opinion of Lord Mansfield there . stated, the casoOf Mostyay. Fabrigas4 to chew that if no otherledge in the Island was responsible to this country, yet the Governor must be, because he was Judge in the last resort there, and if he could not be punished here, he was answerable to none but to God, and was ab solute in his authority. The reason why Judges - of record are not punishable for judicial mistakes, is, because their acts are upon ,record, and there is an appeal ultimately to the King, hi Parlianient—Who Can do ho wrong. He then touched With great feeling upon the eau tion,and 'anxiety with which 'Governor:Pam should have undertaken to exereise'the Spanish law, when lie must know th,tt he took the 'office of Judge iri that respea voluntarily, when he 'sought • it.himstilf, and must take it with all its retiponstbility. • He concluded an address of considertibtelettgth; by apologizing for stepping in some sort citit,.of the dry forbear4nee of a legal argument; far he said, there were some cases. in which no advocate could avoid expressing what he must feel as a man, Oldie British ContinerorT of the Island of 'Trinidad, the groat tthercromby, be would say, that " he came lilac the Angel who, visited the Apostle in 'prison— be came to with the sword, .but be came also • to bid his chains fall from him." Lord Er.Lmtrioticitrott , - 7 -ExpreSsed his satialaklion at the propriety of tit.: argument. Mr, H A a was heard shortly on the same side, and tiA.! Court rose, 'hlr. Ua c.r.AS will probably be heart! on Wednes day for the Defendant. • TUB KING V. FRANCIS JOLLY. The Defendant had been :convicted at the last Carlisle Assizes, before Mr. Aaron Wont" ) of a libel upon Itoberf-Robinson .and Matthew Matthewson, Guardians of the Pim for the rarishof Bongate, tits Westmoreland. 13y the report of , tbe proceedings Ott the Trial, it appeared, that the: two prwtouters, and. a person natned. John Atkinson ; 'had. W4ll j 11... dified at the Quarter Sessions for barbarity and cru elty to an unhappy pauper, the last stage of preg nancy, by having her removed - . from the Parish of Bengate to that whereshe had gained a settletnent. The Grand Jury returned' thoebarge L to be a true Bill ; and,- between this period and the time of the trial,'We Defendant, as PropOor of The Carlisle . Journal, inserted a Letter, .signed “ A Friend 'of the Poor," which stated, that, at the 'fast Ruarter Sessions held at Kendal, .a Bill was prel4red, and en,,,wed by the Grand Jury, apinst / Robert Robin son and others, Guardians of ihe lippr for the .l'a rish of linngate, for illrg lly. nd cruelly causing' to be retuo'Ved a pauper in the Kist stage of pregnancy ; and that neither the tears and intyeaties of the mo ther, nor he decided, opinion of a Medical Gentle man, Could prevail in preventing it. It concluded by..obscrvingohat it was to' be.hoped, for the sake of humanity, that these monsters in human shape would, me e t with -the punishment due to their cru elty, and. hat they would' he taught that tender ness and kindness` were .the indispensable requisites to persons holding such Situations. of Atust and con. ; fidence. The affidavits of the .Defendant, his son Jeremiah Jolly,;tand a Couipasitor of the name of, thomsen, deposed, that, they had no malicious motive in in serting the Libel in question ; but that it was sent to them for insertion, and:-in order to render it less offensive, some Cvords were altered in the original man user iPt. . Mr. fluatiocK, for the Defendant, observed, that this case caa before the ,Court under .ircurnstanees of considerable-mint:o6On. Nro i ntal;rinus dodgn existed an the part .of the Defendant. ri the thin: it was inserted : through negligence it. had obtaiti , A adinission'into the 'Paper, and he trusted the' Court Would not bear too heavily upon an . individuai who had unintentionally.otrended. ; Mr. PAKKE, for. the prosecution, .eorigldOred the libel in question of a most.dangerous tendency. The object of it •%,;:as, to influence! the minds of the Airy -I. , ainst the Proseentors'betWeen the time of find -. Mg the bill and the trial. .The Learned Counsel Very touch doulatedvif It were beneficial to the cause justice, that'statvnents in the pliblio prim of any proceedings previous to the mile. , determination stkotild appear; rate, if. tlicrdid appear, fli t ,. Were to be fair representations of the fact, and not, like'the of a mthu s libelleusand injurious tendency.. , It was. obvious thatirit did' nth obtain adniisskin• into the . ' Defendant's iNfevspaper through carelessness or iogteutiou, for ;natty of the ex*sslops , against the Proscuters were sof teueci down by the Defendant himself: 'rho Defendant wail comtnitted, and orderea to be brought up for judment , On Friday next. MANDAMUS TO TILE:II3ISHOP - O,F F.I.Y. Mr. Frtette applied for 4 .liiwitlitiSits,,to . be direct- ` etl to the Ridtop,.of.Ely,, as ,Visitpx 5t . ,../ohn`4 l college s - Catuhritlgo, direOittg, lthit to hear •anit - de-, cidit upon the claims. of the Rev. -- Wood to rt. sinecure Reetory. 'IE appear,i'?d, however, IlishOv of Ely had alread y given" his" ()pinionthe poiUt in favour oftlie Ntarsh, nrArthe' Court' therefore refused' the applic a ti o n, imviE4 FADEN, . . . , Thli person was now brought up to. lie` baled on the char6e of a rtv upou ,1.,,1z; het IT Stapleton. He himself entered. lute gectilthy to the ainonnt :of 4001. and two suretio the amount •of tool. 'each. COtnyr OT . ,.y.xelly.QUEß, Noy. 21... BuyoliV, to The Judges sat to thoZs.chetitter Chamber to bear ttgalnOts 0 0 I:44t;s i'aiwrYea lot their opinion. • • TUE KING AN forth DEVAII99. The Cage relietvea Ytt Ltii.i I)efetiaant was * Spaniard, taken prisoner of rk „I on board a Data) s hip captured in the ELIA Inthui. At Ptiki comnanly 'called the Prisico of Wales I4land, he volunteered front 01) biord the ..131eithehn ,to 'i~avi atutliel ast Cot npulys t Ala w ick,C4st lining rated as one,ol her crtW., :tad roi tivi lig pay ;'e corctingly,_he prrived ,it tilt! rivcr.(dCoutol), it) Ci t h ) A, when:, in an atira) - , he Englialt sailor of the LUNDDN : I'tintotl 1;1 At -thi name of Barn. He was tried for manslaellitcr at the, last Sessions at the Old Bailey, and found guilty ; subject, linwever, to. the opinion of the Jodges, whether he, being a Spiniard i onbl ..lie tried tg , the said offence in (hid country.' Mr. Bututewes argued, that he was in no sense of the word asubjed of this country, and owed do al legiance trieui Sovereign, and therefore could not be tried in our Courts.. He was' a Spaniard ''and an alien enemy, __ and it was not in his power, by any . ael of his own, in volunteering top on board a mer chanunan, to divest himself of the allegiance which he- ovred to his ewn Sovereign, the King of Spain, or make ._ to himself, by any construction of law,;a Bri tish itibjed. The A'& of the 33d of - Henry' VIII. lot: trying niurders'continitted in foreign ceentrie's,. re lated only to, otlintees cominitted by Brill* sehjeds ; anti the AR of the present King, which extended the principle to the cases of •matiSlaegliter, went iro' farther. If this offence had been.dommitted either in this country or even at' Prime of Wales's rsland,'in such'case the. Prisoner, though .4 Spaniard, would be responsible to our . laws,, because every man .owes a temporary or local allegiance to,that Power in whose doininibtis he reiideS. This offehce, however,' 'vas. - conunitted in China, where the local allegiance Was due only to the Emperor of China; If hi< had volue- teered on board a king's, ship, the-case. might have been'different; or. at all events he would he cogniz.L able by. a Court-Martial. If the offence had bet!en committed oe•theltigh ;seas, he would not take:Opp` bins to Say whether the Admiralty Court would have jurisdi&ion or not ; but haVitig been 'committed'in 'China by a Spaniard; he must contend that - it could r not be legally tried before our Courts. This point appearedle hirer of the most serious importance, and • deserving the greatest attention, inasmuch as the lives of many, British subjeds in foreign countries 'night depend upon it. The principle of temporary andlocal allegiance to the State is whose territories a Mal) resides, was e principle easily understood and universally assented to ; but foreign Nations would • ' be very much at a loss to know upon what principle an alien enemy could be tried by our laws, for 01'7. fences committed in another country. . - Mr. ABBOT,' on the contrary, argued, that as. he: enjoyed- the protedion of the British laws while he was on board,the merchant ship, lie must necessa, rily owe au obedience to that Power whose protec tion he so enjoyed. , ..,. • Lord ELLEN/301(0176m qlsked"Mr. ABBOT, whether lie thought the British laws would have enterced the couttir..,, if' the owners of the merchant ship hedoot .paid him the stipulated 'wages ? s 2 ' -- ' ' Mr. Arsaor allowed, that during the war they • would" not, as he could not sue while he was an alien enemy, arid his property might be confiscated by the Crown. He must, however, coutend, that his,lite would have been proteded by the English laws, 'end that if, instead of killing Burn; Burn had killed him,. he would undoubtedly have been liable to ,be tried here, although . the offenee . Vias, eOrniiiii- ' ted in China. (Seine of the:JudgeS expressed di's- sent.) The Aet of Henry the Eighth hltiodueed no new principle in our law, as bet - ore the paSsing,.of it, murders committed in fOreign Countries were triabie hqure the Constable and . Earl Marshal. It appeared to him, that the Prisoner, in Chatting his, situation froth prisoner of War, to . a mariner ori beard a merchant ship, had dooe an net greatly to hiS own hretit, and that as he did obtain the prottikAlen of our WO, , lie ought to be responsible as a British Subjed ter the breach of them. The Learned Coun sel concluded by citing I hree cases in Support of the dodrine for which he contended.. The first was of 11 VIVIIO . II prikoper Of 'war, whO, in 1799, teas found • guilty :::ill punished for manslaughter committed on hoard the "Triton East.lndiatnao ; the second Was, that of Jean, Prevost, a 'Frenchman, who was exe cuted for thot. Murder of Captain Wilcock's, of the Lady Shire packet, on the eimst of Africa; and the third wits of a Chinese,, of the tame; of Acow, who was tried,hist year and executed for - themurder of a Lascar, on board . one of our Indiamen. '. Slt . Bentiowes, in reply, obserVed, that those Cases had never boon seriously argued, .as the lire. , sorters had Counsel ; the point was, `however, new-made, and.would, he trusted, be deemed worthy of the not `serioes consideration. As to the pris diet ion which the Admiralty exercised 0n..-the, high seas, he ccinceived that it did not depetWon our common law, but on a right 'which the country had so long possessed of a sort of sovereignty on the seas. • • Lord ELL4NittilitWOU and Sir JAI , 4ES MANSP;ULD observed, that this country teener-elaimed any sove reignty except in the Narrow Seas. . . . . , ...[As far as . we could celled from the observations thrown out by the different Judgtet,, it appeared to ens, that the inclination of their minds was, that. this . Spanish prisonercoutn:not bee tried here for' an. 01.! tenev committed in China. The Counsel were, • however, informed, that if the Judges should think: thilt *lt 'Was nieessary to argue, the point flirt her, their i destre wohld'b, , signified to tbOArroaN tsar-1414liaAL ' and Mr, Boattowes.] :1 COURT CIIANCERY, Nov. 23. HUGUENIN V. HASELEY. The Loan enANGELI:on to-day-gave Judgment in this case., After. stating the riature.a the flues by which' the Defendant, Thonias 'llasOey, his , and childreti,'.and also Messrs. Buck, and Mr. William Taylor their': managing Cleik, were called' on to deliver up a deed, dated r,th May, 1804, ton- . veying the estate of - Hampton . (3ay, in the county of Oxford,. to lir; Baseley and his wife, in life-rent, with rernainderte,the children, as heirs in com Mon, in tail, for the 'purpose' of having the same cancelled, his Lordship adtuittedthat there was no ground for tilerdgin any' such, "personal . interposition on the part of the wife or Children in this case,as could *arrant the, Oburt, au that'aeLonnt, in settinftiside the present, 'deed; so far - as they Were. interesttd. tris Lordship, lieWever, should be very sorry if any. dOubt. eoUld he ettiertained iIS In the cotnpetenr:y of the Court to reach a 'case' of 'fraud evtta where ;the grant was' nbtained by the ititerterencti - of .third litistitiettion 'had been decided by Lord lierdwinke, whCi laid it Own its a clear position, that interests so - adolt:ed could not possibly beoutintain. ed, aivt'the principle . 'on which he proceeded Was this, that it: evade the intarferrnee .of that - Colin,. by taking such benetieial interests to their fainily,;or'other third parties, instead . of' them seiVCS; it would be Itnpos'iiible that frauds should ever • lt totai t o f la I t 11, or Pit), ' 4, urt, itow.sitt; a No , 1 12, Strand k Arbere //drat ti,setnergis,,olliers lae reached. This tase 'raffle' -7'to - be Mitred beTfir4 'the. Lords Conunissioners, after Lord Wardwickg, , had quitted the 'Seels, and the judgment of that *ilearneiLLord was affirmed Mr: 'Jestice. Wiinlet laying it down, that • let.ahe hands:takinatheya able' interests he ever so chaste ; comitek its. it through a polluted channel, such altansa6tion could never beaustained, but that the i origioal fraud, kesi' be understOtidte contaminate any person •whoi'pro-' fited by it. 'Lard ThUrlow 'had carried this &Aline still jurther. On this part of the Case, therefore,l', was enough to say, that if the Plaintiff was entitled. to relief against Mr. Basely) , hitnself, she must be equally entitled to relief so far as his . wife and children, were interested. He agreed that. it was the duty of the' Court to jadge . of-tbe case. as it was . alledged and proVed; and he might be. allowed to say, that - the Bill, in the preserit instance, , was not so clearly stated as 'it 'might have 'been He - was alsa satisfied /that it contained a 'great deal' of fout , d alletration'Which not only had not been madeottiH blit had . even - been 'disproved. howeverVll6e was of opioion, enough had been statechon' thW're.;. 4 cord oi enable his bordship to say, that, if •aftioo, takenas a . ; whole, could not stand; - the'deedH in quegtion could not stand: . His Lordship 141,W „ceeded - to take a view of the situation of the parties' at theltithe Mr. Bascle.y introduced himself to Mrs. H. in °dotter, 1803. It was in evidence, that shortly after this; nainely; in 'January, 1804, Mrs. IL shewed a dissatisfaStion 'With the condi:4of her At tornies, 111esrA. Shaw; which she bad never former-. ly manifested., It would be too much to—say • that 'there was evidence that.this dissatishiClion had been prodked by the interference of Mr. Baseley, but that he participated in that sentiment of dissatisfaetion was apparent. As, to the letter written to' Messrs. Shaw, discharging them from any further concern. its her affairs; the weight deviance went to this ; that the Plaietiff called on Mr. B.' and asked' hic assistance in writing t hat, letter. He.. ifintsell stated that' he did•write •the letter in' her presence, and by her sanfaien and direStion, but though it was' his language, the suggestion was hers,His,Lordshlii, conceived; however . ; that : the fast of his havingWilr fen the letter, even although it was at the arkess desire and' suggesiibn of the Plaintiff, was `tai Mt. sueficient notiticatiun that the Plaintiff estAtfied bins that friend, raised up to her by. Provid64ibtii which she so much, needed to. adviie" her, andl' don me 'tier.affairs to the Fl best advantage. OweVer such a_doty might be viewedoSeveliere, tffet Court required that a person, ktfoWing, himself to be thus . celitidentially reposed' in, if he•did not chose town-' ddrtaicer the trust, should at once decline it, The Defendant had not 'done so, but by emb,toklying in writing the suggestion ofthe Piaintllf gave: her event 11 , 45uraheo that ''he had undertaken the trastiraho esteemed hint so completely go:dined to discharge.-:« The question was, had this confidential character which the, Defendant had undertaken, ceases:Li:to exist ?- The Wheleevidenee in the cause - wenorao prove that it had not. His Lordship then projecill ed to take a view of thee, two deeds-aecuted by the Manua, and prepared by Mr. Buck, as an arrange ment of the whole of Mrs. H's property, and Which his Lerdship conceived tube ..so utterly improvident, that the should - not have been suffered! to execute then}. 'She was not without friends in this country. Wad Mr. Buck gone to,.,either of the Meaars. Hills, her lirethere-inslaw,and 'desired them to remonstrate 'with her on the impropriety of her conclea . ? • Had he gone even to Mr. B. and told him that he was : t‘.) Winne iu . accepting the.gitt? !'his latter ceremony Mr. Justice Wtemor thought necessary, being olopittion. that la such cases both Grantor and Grantee consulted: His Lordship was fir from saying that the Court would interfere' to overturn the pure voluntary. - acts of a party. But if they were not the pure, voluntary' and 'well-understood acts of a party, then the Court was bound to interfere. Having pointed outirsevee' ral, • inconsistencies and imeroprieties in thei,: two deeds, particularly the waot of a clause of revaeation in the deed in question, and the inconvenient- alailc, in which the power to revoke was, reserved:in. the other .deed, and shewieg • that Lord Hardwicke, considered the want of that lower : as amounting to a atroog suspicion that the party did not understand ' what she was about, his Lordship declared himself to beihoroughly satisfied from the - whole 0-ctiin atancea ofthe case, that the Plaintitiip this case could not poSsibly have been a mil eof the i:iikt,frtof the deeds she wasexecutieg. He was peruaded that Me. .B. was notconscious . Unit he had undertaken a Wahl' the, nature which the Court was called on to Vii4Lthat with which lie h:id invested himself to be, (they . he would not have Suffered the, plaintiff to es ecafr'ei deed in his favour,; nor, he was vise coat inCti W e 04.4 1 Mr. Back viewed the matter in the light, in fal by his greater knoWledge of the praSlice of that Court, he had felt himself bound to consider it. His .Lord ship therefore ordered the deed td -be given upi costs, following as a matter of course. Mr. Buck was also to deliver up the 4'o, without regird to his bill of CCOS, for .which however with the exception yt the . charge for the two deeds' alluded to, for which no alleivances was to be made,. he should have a lien on thebt her papers in his possession.. It 'was agreed, that a minute as to the matters to be referred to the Master relative to bygone rents, improvements, deterioratians, IV.c, should be dtavVn up fOr'after consideration.. BoxtN'a.--It will belvmembered that a desperate battle' was fought 'a few weeks since in klatnpshire, between a celebrated Chatppion in that eoonry, Oft he naine of ,Flowers, a coaChmanVc*bo had won all his foriner battles,'„and achair-thant of the'name of 'Jonas, also a n*c't professor, VAo tra vels the 'cortritry, and that 'after 'nearly twit'hoUri contention Jotyas was declared the victor, tc T, who since file 'above contest has Made boiling his,,prolisSion, tact his' death on Friday last, at,. Knightsbridge, by the' rr blnws' he received in a pitth red" battle, at IDresden;.green, - ItuCks, with a.paviga- ! for of the natne Courteney, a fOrti4ht ',4och was the obstinacy of-this btitoe, which lasted an. hour and 4 hall,. thnt' the parties were taken off the, ground alike punished, rind to such an extent 'that tile ) ; wer e una bl e to W a l k . up to meeteach othcrlr they-were to have foirght the bathes over r again iit but death decided thu'inatch,. as' Svc 4 4 %74 .dre;i , ly stated. Jonas had . been turablq to tan . in hiq bed`sinee the conflict, and th e survivor ''is' x r et unable to walk. tsti ptibi6hcti by I VILL'i4N4 Antutioaa Scit lira, of St,tVi Mai Far the Paper; , iloitt'f . F.tin the Wive, titc. !P W4u . 'CR AI/LSE/IN ,NOV EMBER - Vs laivary's • Ship,. T fivp,l-1)14 nivel Plata ; N'lo9rei tri;nl th e Saaiirla ; (;everal Alevl 'l4 ll = a !'au; .trinn Satita ;004 — ilt"irri - r Marla, Dqbari.ACtive, Spell! t..ery Agentffi4;-ilat-,.• Ogles, siov e t l i oit A n t l ,g a w49ll, NW . '" 19 1 14 loci .sAs sy , • Oy,ers : LACCIO CartraCil, and salsa, t;°4114/1 trairn 4ri F ixtrwtk. ; • ) Sailecimitte -s4undeTs, for Africa ; Woodrup Site , tiaS'as* - fatt. Cl4l4Lestuavra ; Carron, • Ma.eici 10r.A11 40 . A•uxion, 047015 d, MOrjirC h,Kllttj, •- • tirade, itin Airgustrr Kirby, • C.:Vila/me tiaveDa 41 ...4ce Witt kh.q.i-isvraJYa Plait, iv( larpwcAs t~rR t)ft anditlf.toornW * lft Lower ‘V 411 I)PkositoritOtV 114-1411 Of Cjilßtill llgn'ty , t)gslow, of tin: Ktiyal„itrtijlery,, of piughtet. • of C?Pla YAstPritiay, , Ricjipouct. Surrey,. the . J t 4ity,,ia. of the 2 Surrey. of a Son. , The:same. day, .at- his hutibe L.incolies-inn-tields, PTte „t john Fete; Cyaht, ltscl , of a S".•' Lately... l'aztt.place, St. towel's, Wits. WilljtOPWAtli fDta Son, ittaticap. pOn the ilth inst. at kitteir, Staffordshire, Capp4S_i.V., ate of the Royal. Marines, to Mrs. Leaky, ut•Tavisw'' I PUV II • t rid.ay, at St. Michael'i Church Bath, Capta in lips, of' the..itioyai.Navya to Miis Altirecsits 01 Ni1e°4"4444 .• DINA OR hintulay . the 'nsth'inst. at Cainshorough, of a 111 , declin e , - i n hOrit9t l X‘YfaTs Miss Trevor), ti.inglacr of, 14 10 * Trevor, Esq. On Thuratarluk, thmigth inst. a fter a reyi ) 1110 1 1t 11 $ I W'S. L4Wittli hewis, 4sq, at his tionse, Rodili47 l " c4 . • Pentonititio. Viii On Friday morning last, aged,74, ~the Right 1400 . countess Ifwitly rett of-the Tate Right Hon. Viscount l r win, of Temple Newsom, Yorkshire. - Yesterday morning, alter a long and 'painful Hines!, Miss Ilwer: Patrick; sister. to Mr. John PatricAs,Q 4 ' 11 " 41(7-. street. Lately, aged 67, Mrs; Smith, wife-of. Mr. Thonies&inttht, Catwick, nearileverley. PRICE OF STOW. YLSTILAD4T. • Ita,* Stock, InditiStptiti NaM5 per Cent. 9S 1 1 India Bonds, rah ' I#' Per-74ent• 1 797. ,Exghe94o Ifill,4sl s ' Itt4t. 5 per Cent. })rem. 4.pa' Cent. Ila JOlnnitirth 1,1 3' per Cent. Red. 6z; 63 3, per Cent. I)efer.-1 3 per Ct. Con: 63.1} 3 pet Cciit. 62 Rank L. Apit,,l7,iis.l6thSi Di”QAnn• DIM Short - Ann. Con. for ioth inct, Or. HIGH ‘VATIiR AT LONDON BRIDGE T(i..MOR: Row. rrninr. Alta iv Murnjig! s!a, migr. - arlci 9. i LONDON. bl,ellucj - Asr 4iq Is 111 NIARK-I.INIEi i 4. t- F 4 it NI c 4 .1 " i '•-. 4 otittliii of Nov. to the 1014 tattle Act. A •t 6 o 4: 3r9 eudirrer);. 227 -,---,-r , -, , At, cif? t 9, , •—•--.....—;„ a t i . ; ss 0 4''' 2kt, ..---.--.--. at 5 rA t 1 238, --,,,,---..• at. 54 oa 1 4 , 27; --7,---,—. at, !:,$.. 0 ~—rtverage ois til. !tan last liggiuo. , , RETURN OF WitEA iiy Niao4.ls., 4 t 46. arid M itcluding only (rum...the 9 . th too, ttCri at 6g act t 6ts cul S 610;04 4 6 -1-- at 063 61 at 66* ci S i, 04 5 4 i. 3t ept. biz. It 64 . ,.q.ct 594 at ( 2 b 4 ts 64 Tot 4: its; witai lit 1 ....._ A It E Tti ItN Hi , i 1.0 04 . FrQui Nov. 7. to :';Ov• 1:., i(iiiii the t:ixkot,OttiCti .: &aks. —a; (IC Sivt:J. • ' a. d . ' Savks. '-,a. a , 2, —•—• 4 4 .1 . ) --5 j li iv ..-- si f It --- ii o 212( —i3 0 361 --- 4011 a ....-•..- St. 0 2,2i1 1 4,7 - .r". :-. s ..; 1 6. , 3 -- •sx 0 1 1,;co ---- iia 1 347 —r — ,S 4 u 1 , i x *-- i• 6 I 3 - , -re 0 e mai SO =4Cir-iaL 4 3 5. IV ' act. ---=Averigc 544. st. per Sack , , l'otal—t4,B;,; JcicS: Q .l. 0 4,1, - per Sack. Iptver than List %,.. 4:k. . .........." ................11.0141........ WESTERN COUNTRY MARKETS (last Wo,ek)per • Wheat. *barley. ()As. liitittaty cis Co 76s 12'0 ort to jcp; .27* pit CO 3 0. Saflinty 5 . 6, to 64s 361 od to 380 21is ct to 3 01 ilaSengstuke I 5 ,2, 7, 113 ; oil t 9 394 Wilichs;cr I DAS t? MP I 3hi od to 4os ad 126,0 u Dcvitei to boa 364 od 42s:ed el to .3' l ; Warnivitcr,B> to 7os • 37s Ott to 4 0 s Ot t •2 f , CO 34 1:+ - ! •' • VRICE (L HOPS. Ken sset, 41. to. tp 51. 165." Kent, $1.'0.. to O. t 6i. Sux, 41. los. to 51. Suistx, 04, to Si. P% Ib , ex, 41. to Si. 6s. - V.trolUtu tit. os. to RA NIiWCA ri: ANP 1-11 , 4PE;Nadt - C.,1. 4.14,10 0 " llxtlio Carcase. .. a ll IS. 61. to Eit,O.l. 1%/ CA 3s. od. to Ss , o , s . zs.. Sct. to :Ni. 41. I l'ork. 4 s, ~}l., to y• _,-.....---' Beef - -14 i A 01 ' 1 PRKIE:OF L.EATMEIt (per lb.) AT 1.1;41).1i ..... . ~,1 ,- I 414131. t to 561 b. cid' . . . irt i., t 0 .g17 , P,4l,pe q c ub slb. eJCII .. . • 20,' tfl i t . pke.tt;tots' 11A,:lis, . . ~ . 2 0 4. 1 0 AI ,; /11 1 d1 !Ode s, • - - . Att. to i 4. 1 ACCosklll Hides, . _ . . I) ,I. l ip t ,l9, . - lot i • ,3u. top lit 4, 3i to 44 1 b..hr Qtitting 1° " 0, Ditto, 45 to sans; • 7 . C4lf Skills, JO to 401 b. 464. tO,j;(1. per lb. VittO. So tO:6 Oti. to .Pd. pe r lb• Ditto, 7o to 3341... to 30. per 14: : Sm4ll:SeAls . (S;rocolattti) 3s,i. to 404. per Large ditto - • toos. to los. iter,Doten• Tarissoci liii4cs, 13s. to. 235,. cacti. RAW II IDL4. ' d, 1 Best HcifersandSteers.(p. st.t Ordinary, rs. gd, to ts• l a d ,. ss. Sd. to is. Ida., mirvii.oz.it, J4*... 4 ,4' to, middling,4zs. 04. to :0. Ad. Eng. Igo rs , : i 44. (0 ii) , q''' , r Sheep Skins 4 . 2S ou to __4:3 ...., 04 .„....mre„,, OF 'I St. Jarrtcesillaricet 43. Clare Market 43. 34 - ', IVititeettapgl Marlctt 4s. oil, per stone of Slb. 'ALLQW. , : T0 e r ir? 0 w, 1 1 , 411 4 0 4 w69 y 4 White do. 6 5. SOal) tto. 6 ts. 'is. 6Ad . , Meltinti Stutrsnte. Average price 4s. '2d; • Ditto r ough l'Grawes as. od. GRod*Dregv cgs. ou • Yellow SimiP'44L-r-MatlieSio.9os.:•—•:C4itis 94 4, c o, Price or CaniiitA per dozen r. is ad. —4ioulds, I As• • r. l l St. IANIES/s: &I A 1.(1(gT,; PloY4F.l* li 3y, 44 0. Jo 61.44. —Avcr. si• 35.. ai1 . ,t , straw, 11. t 6.. ott. to at. 2s, it:AL—Ayer , . 11. J 9 WIIITECIIAPEL kIAY MARK Vr` A Her, 41. LOS. ca. to 61. 66. oil. --Aver. tos.oul, Clatter, St. os. od. to 71, os,, pd. --AXeri, 6 , 1 . s,_,P"',ld, Straw♦ it. sgs. 6(1. rti II; 10 $'• New Hay Pi. GS, I),Cr. LOO, e()AL --.IARKET. SOPi. 6 s 9.1 cis 61 -i At ;1 i A O P ' 4 1 : ;', al 40 od 06 9 l ' 1 at .476 ,/ a ~ -0 =" ..4...., co 2. Lt ::,pi 041 t 6 at ci eti i4.' r ., ........--',.. ; Ships at Market,.. 16. 6; Newcastle - 4 Saila:A.ll4 !c iJoi. 'Ne ,, castli: ,• - • Siintlerland • -) Cfficipts 23 Newt:3;ex -1: r , ,2,Cinfjyrs 10114trett, VC; mint-130 • ;;~"'