The Sun. — London, England, 1813-06-03 00:00:00

:•..,'ZLt - !_,; ; - ;4:::,' . L - ':."..,:..-.);.,.:: . : 't,'.i:: nodrycw to to-Inprrow se'nnight, in the hnri that the Noble Lord Castlereagh would, in the unea” time, .take measures for affording Them lief, r. licNricK postponed the Insolvent Debtors Bill till to tnorrow se'nnight ; as did Mr. R. PEELS the Irish Insolvent Debtors Bill to Friday se'imight. The Bill to preserve the Scotch Bridges front the floating of timber, was read a second time, cue mi - red to,thorrow. The Cox .c.Et.t..tat of . the EXCHEQUER brought in a for the mote effectual provision for the sale and redemption of the Limit Tax, which was read a first time, atitf ordered for a second 'read ing un thi s day se'unight. Mr. WiLugaFoncE gave notice that be would to-morrow move for leave to bring in a Bill to re githite and amend the Acts for the Abolition of the Slave Trade. Lord. P.keigensToN having obtained leave, brought in a Bill to provide. for the Punishment of Soldiers detached front head-quarters in the Peninsula, and guilty of excesses ; it was.read a first time, Second reading on Wednesday next. On the motion of the CH ANCEL L6R o f the Ex - CHEQUER, the House resolved 'into a Committee of Supply to which various accounts:mil estimates were referred. The Bight Hon. Gentleman, after Stating the grounds of his proposition, moved that t.:5,000t. be granted to the sufferers in the Island of St. Vincent, which was agreed to ; as was it vote of 4,000,0001. to make good the.de heiency in the Army Extraordinaries fOr the year 1811-12. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER then stat ed, that the amount of :the Army Extraordinaries he should have to propose for the present year, would 'be 9,500,0001., the particulars of which he would explain more fully on a future occasion. Be would now content himself with saying, that there was required 4,500,0001. over the vote for last year, and that for the service of the present year, he should move for 5,000,0001. with a *mo tion for which sum he concluded, and the same was agreed to. A variety of small sums were also voted on the Irish Miscellaneous Bstimates, after an observa tion from 'VI. Ponsonby, who complained of the lateness in,the Ses3ion in which -the. money busi ness of Parliament was now transacted. The Irish Sessions House Bill was read a second time, and committed for to-morrow. . AFFAIRS OF INDIA. On the Motion of Lord CASTLEREAGH, the House went into the Committee on the Affairs of India. The question 'being put on the Third Resolu tion for Opening the Trade to India under mit tail' restrictions, Mr. RICKARDS, after expressing the interest be felt in the question, laid it down as an axiom, that a rich nation could not derive great benefit from traling with a country of beggars. He then pro ceeded to spew that tills was the situation of In dia) and entered into an interesting historical view . of the Zetnindar and Moondar system in Bengal and Madras, to shew l that these systems had ruined the proprieiory interests of the coun try, reduced the riats or hushandriten to a state of extreme wretchedness, and destroyed the springs of an .advantageous commerce, by tendering the produce of the lands valueless, and ineapable of heingexchtinged in return for other commodities. The riches of the *Empire were confined to It few good trading ports ; , and the cultivators of the soil round them ,vere in misery, only.labonring for, so much as would sustain their own actual wants. Nothing, he contended, but a change in the revenue system could do any effectual ser;. vire to India, or cause that fine country to be be neficial to Britain. Yet the system which had . caused the whole propeity of Bengal, to change masters, and reduced the population to beggary and wretchedness, was that which the House had heard boasted of, its conferring unspeakable bless 'ings on millions ranks were dissa tisfied with it, and Zernindars and plats alike ready to join tin! standard of any disaffected Chief.' It had been said that the culture of waste lands would lighten the pressure of the revenue--but where was the . demand . for the produce of such lands that must be created before the rea soaing was good, for. at present the' production a . double quantity was of no value to the cultivatOr, since the only consequence of his in dustry was a 'diminution of the . price of his goods. Lie adyked, the Muse - therefore to allow wealth to Clow into the country ) as the only means of giving employment to active indus try and encouraging the produce of commodities Which Might be bartered for artieleS ofßritish ma , rinfacture. .India, he said, would prosper, did the Directors adhere to the pure political principles of Government they laid down, but he was afraid they too often sacrificed these to commercial spe 7 culations. Internal commerce not having in creased, was a proof that the condition of the people had not improved, and the reduction of the reve.tine generally was the only remedy for the existing evils. Ile had said this much to excite the benevolent attention pi the house to the condition of the poorlndians,whohad no able advocates here, as other parties had. One ray of hope gleamed upon theta in the event of a perfectly free and un shackled trade, which would give a real value to Zemiadary estates, and improve the condition (.4 the mint in a way he despaired of theonglt any other means. This would be,the case wheat the Com pany ceased to pursue the course to which they were wedded by their prejudices, and consented to adopt the more liberal system, which 'wOuld be as advantageous to them as that they now adhered to Was ruinous, He trusted, therefore, that the re newal of the Charter would not extend to twenty years, and concluded a very aide speech, by ridiculing the idea that the habits and wants of the people of India were incapable of change. — They flesh and blood like other men, and Ifs 11 , 7er ,iw ; one hutilit yet, -who, if ins eireum , atford it, had not many wants to ' to gratify, which Bri- (n 1 to pro • ;'. '• ti,j) p . ^ -;: in .necessity a which he would' deinisustrate more fully hereafter, in a view of the accounts of the Compimy ; in the mean time he he',.;geti pardon for trespassing: so long upon the and for intruding any considerations personal to himself upon their notice. . • Mr. C. GRA.NT was unwilling again to tress upon the time of the Committee, but he felt him self called upon to make some remarks on the speech of the lion. Gentleman who had preceded him. If all that had been said by the lion. Gen tleman Nvas true, it - would be necessary to allow, that all those great men who had been supposed to have benefited the country by their services in India, had acted upon mistaken principles, and', their mistakes the Hon. tientleman had taken upon himself to correct. Ile would, hywever, -venture to say, that the lion.'Oentleman iias singular in his opinions, and that no person who h,ad ever been in the service of the Company would support such doctrines as he had On that night iicivanced. The scope of his arguments had been to prove, that unless the biliabitantsof In die, who were known to he an agricultural people, were transformed into a commercial nation, they could never be made happy. Proceeding upon this principle, the Hon. Gontleman had said, that all the reformations made by Lord Cornwallis, instead of tending to make the natives hi:ppy, had in reality made them more miserable than ever. In reply to this,. lie had only to 'say, that he be lieved he knew all that had passed in India for the last twenty years, and from this knowledge was enabled to•stateit as his firm belief that the Hon. Gentleman, when he made this affirmation, was completely mistaken. To flud ysliether the con dition of the native Indians bad been improved by the Company, - it was only netessary to compare the present state of the inhabitants of India. with -that in which they were before any measures weiss undertaken - by the Company for their improve 'merit. The Hon. Gentleman hastcontended that the Zemindar tenure had been made the sciurce of misery to the possessors of it s owing to tlisi sue s. sures pursued by the Company in exacting rent for landed settlement. In opposition to this he coif. tended, the the system of land payment porsned by the Company was not only the Most ancient, but the most politic and the tu4st expedient, be sides being that which was most conducive to the happiness of the Zeminclars. He wished this mat- - ter should be referred to the consideration of a Committee above stairs, to establish the truth of this opinion. If the expectations so generally entertained and encouraged by, the commercial • people of England, could be realized, it would •afford him much• pleasure ; but the more he in quired into the subject, he .was convinced that the' fulfilment of such expectations was impossible. lie did not exactly say that it was impossible that the consumption of goods of British manufacture, by the natives of India, could not be increased; but from the inverate attachment of the natives to their ancient usages, their habits were so deep lyrootcd,. that any considerable change hi them could only be effected after a long course of years. Besides this, if in the process of time it should happen that the native Indians acquired a taste for European articles, such was the ingenuity of the Natives, that these articles would speedily be , manufactured by their own artizans, and of course this would of necessity put an end to the impor tation of British manufactured goods. Iklr. Ricissans, in .explanation s said, that he was not singular in the opinions which he had stated. For a confirmation of the opinions which he had expressed on the subject of the Zemindary settlement, be.would lineal to no less authorities than 'Lord Teignmouth, Lord W. Peutiock, Mr. Colebrooke, Col. Willis, Col. Macaulay, and Col. Monroe. Sir EYII-17. COOTE said—". I tun aware, it is pre situiption in me to rise upon a question of so much importance, and which involves the interest . of our Empire in the East ; but being prompted by more than common feelings, I trust I shall be allowed the indulgence of the Committee to tres-. pass on their patience fur a few moments.--- To 'man can read the history of -that great Empire, without admiring the talents, valour, and industry: y which it has been acquired to this country ; and -we must all lament to see a chance of the fruit of that labour awl that industry being impaired Or„ endangered. We learn from a great Statesman, that " to innovate, is not always to reform." - Innovation is . not reformatiOn : of this truth a neighbouring nation h.as taught us a me lancholy example, Impressed with this idea, 1 for one must, in common With many Gentlemen around: Me, pause upon- the subject now before the House. I have, given this great ; question every consideration my limited understanding will admit, :and the more 11. reflect, the -more I 'find myself involved in intricacy and difficulty. This, strengthened by a . conviction that British India has'greatly flourished under the superintendance of time - Company, would persuade me to hesitate and withhold my assent to measure of political experiment, which, in pursuit Of a doubtful ad.; I vantage, might destroy, but certainly endanger the benefiti ,arising from the &Orions and iminor tal achievements- of the heroes of Plassey, Wan diwash,. Pondicherry, Seringapatam, Ass-ay, and Lisswani:?!." Mr. Ttaio4.s7„ after a suitable exordium, la , -limited the course which had been pursued by the advocates for free trade, who had not brought forward any evidence in favour of their system, before the Committee, where such evidence would have been minutely sifted and examined; but. they came forward with their faCti in the de bate, where there was not any opportunity af forded for having them examined with that accu racy and minuteness which in sucb a case was so necessary. This system had been followed by the 'Honourable Gentleman who had on that evening opened the debate. No evidence came from that quarter front which in justice -it ought to have come ; for it behoved those who were inimical to the renewal of . . the Charter, to prove why it ought `not to be renewed., But when the Company came out, supported on every side With evidence, all that wins to be set at. nought by assertions boldly made in the debates —they were to be met with the lissertions that the. acts of- the Company, in their c•lpacity Of Sovereigns, are prejudicial to trade; • THOMAS WOOD, of No. 11e, Strand; and Publish( No. 112, Strand, wbere Advirtiminents Orders fi thotigb he di,a not believe there was a single wits ness who could be futon' to give testimony to this effect, in sleds' a shape as to bear • exanti settion and minute Inspection in all its -bearings • Feeling as lie did npon that great question, he could not for one moment allow any Consider ation ef party allegiance to weigh for a moment, in a measure which involved the cvelfare and the safety of so cousiderable a portion oldie British Empire. The evidence produced by the Commit tee was so very comprehensive, ,and entered into details so copious, that every Geetlenian would feel that it was•diffieult •to digest it; or to select the more important points on which more parti cularly to insist. The system introduced in 1784, and improved in 1793, lie - believed to be one which was most calculated for the support of 11). dht, for the welfare of the natives, and for the ad vantage of Great -Britain. This opinion was. op posed : by those Who argued that all governing power should be vested in the Crown, and that all trade should be free. It was opposed by an other class, who would preserve the Company as a political body, while they would destroy it as a mercantile, corporation. They proceed upon some such principle as this ; as you twenty-four have ,made good merehents, I presume that you must also make twenty-four_ good Governors. And here again he would say, that they should have brought forward something to prove the goodnesi of this proposed system,- Or at least it was in. cuinhent to have proved that there was some de fect in the existing system. This, however, was . not attempted, and certainly it was the interest of the advocates of the new system to have made such n charge. But as the charge had .not been made, he concluded, prima facie, that it was not pOssible ; or, at least, if it as made, that it,could trot be substantiated. It was said, that when cer-. tain restrictions Were removed, for the purpoSe of ',ambling private merchants to trade to India, that t'lis was done by way of experiment ; and that, if it was found to succeed, it was meant that it should be extended to a free trade. But he would 'ask, was this experiment meant for the benefit of the inhabitants of India ? The Hon. Gentleman . himself, who had opened the debate, would say that it was not. The Hon. Geotleinan-adMitteds that the Country had . s'tewn every disposition to - do what benefit thy could to' the inhabitants of. India. • Whether they succeeded or not, was a mere matter of opinion. The fact, however, was, that 50 millions - of people were never governed more accoeding to their own happiness than the people - of India. - Yet it had beeu said that the Company had not traded With profit. In this point olview, this was of no consequence, the i,treat ob ject being the proper government of the peeiple ; and any failure was not without good cause, and was no matter of Surmise, when the almost con stant wars which had been carried on in India were considtn-ed. But to return to the' private trade : if by the Act of 1793, a fair inlet was given to the private trade, thew there must be an end to theclamours about exclusive mOnopoly. The system of Lord Melville was, that the monopoly of the East India CoMpany 5110u141 be a regular one ; that is, that it should admits() moth of private trade. as should be considered consistent with the securi ty of the Government of Oa British possessions.- hisCompeny had now a revenue of 16 or) 7 millions annually ; it had an hi - intense and valuable army; that it had what to all intents and purposes %yes to, it a fleet; that it had a set of servants who had character for integrity and leithfuluess in the dis- Charge of their duty, which ; was not to be match- .. ed ; that the Company stood high in the reputation Of the country in general, and scarcely any man in that House would deny that the Government of the Company had been managed with justice,.aud with a regard to the happiness of the people of India ; yet .all this was to be Rushed down, to be overthrown, only to let thecountry have a little more trade. He would strenuously insist, that regulated monopoly was the best way to conduct the trade with India : and Parliament had no right to take, without evidence,• from the Port of London, to give to the'out-ports, that which bad • been„ V) advantageous, and which to them was at best dubious. It would be highly impolitic to, throw down that Which they knew to 'be good, for the purpose of Teising up that of which they knew nothing. Suppose a man Were asn enemy t 6, India, what better plan could he propose for the ruin of it, than to remove from their employ ment the many thousand's now employed in the . manufacture of .cotton ? When the renewal of the. Charter was proposed. in 1793, to what did the appliCation front Glasgow go, but •merely tci crush the Native NN- savers of India. The only thing now proposed, or proposed for the- last 30 years, was in effect nothing more than the im:ortation of the raw material from India. He did not see any good likely to arise from the: plan proposed. He did not mean any reflection upon British traders, but with respect to. Liverpool, I e shoeld' be sorry to see any ship from that town, or any commander of a ship, formerly emplOyed its the trade to Africa, go upon any commercial expedition to the East. Indies..--s- Accotalingto the „measure proposed, persons could settle in or go. to India, even against the %visit of the Directors, which must in the end effectually destroy their power and respect as a Government. the wish of Ministees was to give the Gover n of ,into the hands of the Crowe, it Was' better to do so at once than actin this man ner ; but the fact was, that they were now only yielding to the clamours of certain. merchants. Lo rd COTLEREAGLI said, that the Right lion. Gentleman bad very properly alluded to hint (Lord Castlereagh) in the course of his spee6h, and he felt it' his duty to obviate the misconceptions which that stleech was likely to produce. • The grounds of the itteastire were wierepresented. The Right Hon, Glentieman (I‘ll-. TierneY) seetneitto think that it Was necessary to prove the delinquen cy of the Company; bitt sturdy there was no oc casion for this. If the notion of a limited charter Conveyed any meaning, it conveyed - aut acknow ledgment of the power of Parliament to deliberate upon it. It - was not necessary- to make out , any case against the Directors. The thing resolved s itself into three questions ; whether the former system should be- observed, or an entirely new one adopted, or a middle course pursu- Bank Stock, Navy 5 per Cent. 87i 88 87i Irish. 5 per (2% , nt. 4 per Cent. 7141 43 vur Cent. Red. !Vail per Cent, cons. 584 Z;i3 Batik L. Ann.-14 9-16 7 -16 1 linint SWOT, . ed by WILLIAM ARMIGER SCRIPPS, South Nloltnn- street. Grosvenor-sywc, 'or the Paper, Lclt&rs for the Editor, Sze.' (post pa!d) , melt be addressed! . . • i , ed I lie did not thiuk• the preiwr ':‘l" r ' ..41 in either extreme; awl it was stolg e, Y''' the anathema the Bight m flou'Oorahle (;e"t'- an (Mr 'Tierney) Lad nu proonced upon the met mdle c o urse, that he fell upon - it afterwards 0,- liitt lt • This was a proof orthe poverty of his argo v i eat The truth was, he never 'heard a more unstdritii: tial speech• front that Right Hon. GentlerniOi• It was prepared to argue, ' , that the changt. contribute to the general pro%reritv of botli coal); tries, and that no profit, However greit, to t,, private merchant, should induce the fro,' ~ adopt the plan if it was not consistent %v . " ' !„ happiness of the .Natives o f I n di a , . Evcil shoo;,:! it were admitted that it INCuici introduce a g i:' `'''.t.i., number of Europeans into th e interior, th,.,,,. not sufficient cause for alarm. ii !I e question; was as to the s ystem that was beSt for th e real 11' -pines& of India and the trade of this country, ,,, argnment drawn from the habits of the peop ,e ' cx ., far as it concerned trade, was pushc,l tO"Ta..y . c treme. Even the article of cotton alone, 0... ported in a manufactured state front this,eq,, try, had increased within the last t-ventY Y"' ) less teas it was . re elated upon unwise priacl l ''''', t: l l l e e ni o l i d si nl a c t e a sk r b s ita e c t i o t i t: p s ll ; o l o , f l i c t l d i r. ; ° i i i:ia l t i i ,l : ll e vY t h r ' i tl i ll i tec 7, t v t e l r -. .: appointed by . the Company or not ? Na 'ir4k". imient was brought : to prove the danger or: rij'*" - ,1;:, ttood of Europeans settling in the intc, 14° ;;,,:1160 was a country in which the nature dr" ` 17 7,, .. was applicable to this case., in which 11 ° ' .° , 4 . , pean could stir without being su bject to the, 1:0 N S P ‘ P • a e e t r . c l e i t a i :to l n e ti o i l l l f t a t fi b o t e o n e , l a o tr p t ii p e iy a ,::% y g v . ha n t i :v t a e s ve t il:eirfeatt:)YPa:e:.;l;.l. a tti g itiee ai:: u st t_ t i v , a o s r , ts ty n i: o lg uli t i tp the a lt r a e 11 1 :1 1 : (1 0 Y f ? I ll ' Ill ' ileu:elir.g;: : ;:' Parliament front intei l . i f a eri e n (I/saf, hear!) lf the danger w ere found to ao- , l' an attempt on the part of those who trel'ek i g' l ',',' , hear) the F,iround of chimerical lear p ., lan x t .v t . ) i t t i l e i r i e ti: p t e h c e t htlointststuoufg.Piaitiir:lig:iai:gltellctl : I : , ;: i : e f oe ; l : it i l - r: g n . o C(llio;artie.tr) toTOilfiscT..,.l:l't, was a mere pretence. There wits no cotoltrY t '‘ th , rs:,:iinrle,i,ceisi,:it.,:hnleigy:irit;r:aaigcnieitiii,taittriyalarto:vea,s„onio.et. fartotienti,d;dit:,:iits.'elcier... than from their own (bear ). lle 101' 1 ,,„, ),,,: he f . t b e t e l t a t c t e a r l i s e t i: l P l i . ::t . i i i l i i l t e n t a i l l i t t e , o testEt.rtnieilislel,tir;cecgerlei. i.:sghferAtiv;rititislistec,:.:etilt:::3i;l).,:ivil ill l' il ) : c e e lt ,: c E o as n t ip l a t t i l t y lia Company. used their power with honour? - f t! tll' t discretionto uld ttot g u i , t_ i • l e i c t i i; 3 t o - i t t h li r e i i t e n v ' es t h i l;e: i es: l e: 1 ;;;;:i 'li- „ I t i na l t r f i l i , ll 4 ; ' t i li 'l e le t i t r n c c ° le l r le st e a r n li t s li ‘ n v g e s re o li t c!iv iti l l i, ; " b c o h d t y °lo) t f ‘l:ll:el)ll ' i ' ca'; i ( i i pl i e iri' . must say that the Company Were lall",k iri t cow a weight which Oppressed t h en , Daring ---. 10 , tinuance of their late Charter, 00' e , jl..r L i el oseAl their affairs with inadequate fUndS, an" e o 'b o rt themselves to commercial losses, 1":11,',1yeb,;:,r1.,.,er; I:tan of men should be ikposed to. f k i t ) : l l lt o i li t ls v i c t s t t il t o : e h y e ( e r ff iAl e : : le t it ri l r ee , e r v t .h el e ll s e a e t: a o us , o::: l ,... te ti .r :; p : t .ll. o ll l . l e .4.t t l.' 1 ; 1: ?, :e:( 6 )). ; c . 1 0 411 , ' e 5 : ; : ,, : mot , • . rsahogoueltiluietnftdschl,eihttutitepereosps:)tsrey(r a p ,, e , r l " i f::, l ::,:i n d :e'nifo'.o. .to say,• that if the Cornpan; the 1 " mereial system of the last 15 year'' , could HOZ. sin ors them. cacti tlie Mr. . FL N•L A Y aud Mr. FOO3O sup Aeri Resolution. bist sr — d. . . , ' ' P Mr. oNsoNay agreed With tile i , k„ n replr e ,. that but few lgenibers present'cot.hu,—ii `,6tli w e to give an opinion on this . I.teOl uti° l4„.fe ba eight or tine premises attached•to it• "t thot 1 they went the more satisfied he 1" 5 ,t till ill" persilted in),t01.1.t..:,iiii1.111,7 not fit for Parliament finally to decide ` ) . l .gent so' . portant questionin the course of' lli f e T i t e to bri! sion. He thought it would be: s tag of t biog in a 13111 to continue • the pres.ent ,stat e t „ r opet, fir one Sear, in order to oive earliaolcll r .i r. • t h i e ni f e el t t o it di l s v p a o s s i e ni of this subject. t dio ra, to s l Lord CASTLEREAGH, WRS Willil l g' -6 a 'ogle r pOssIOIC Jur i .• satisfactory conclusion that nigpt• p„ c oo !, s b o ro to u ;u ht nt i l l e i r , st t at o ttling on the bosi ne ' s ' anil l:t t riP J. Sir J. N Ave p oßT w i s hed t he Clods ~-, . Thoo gr ~ state t f l :r l o a t s t t e S v el e ): a la r lt , kien t ri' l l i e at titi til it e :gst:eilailllii(tri!lelin.ll:bes'civii' , . . Oda' properly discussed. 1 ' Righ t te - Lard CAszo...ERE%G.H, throight Baronet premature in. obEerving tha t r } l ' ha li ,l3,ll, i tions Would not be disposed of be, f 9 re ; t- t e olo utii i t the 1 L I wo . the 5. .. ; 0; 1 1 3 ) 0 1 :S o u t4 , l3 c( lt i S c l o :i l . t ) * .t t 0'.131. continued t b t o l l e e cp u n i tile i s t is n i : c- 0 : - caorr :: :, „ i ll o lf . decision on this great question. 10 tb e e of 1 11 the present Session, to take the sell'erid. (lose on that point at no very dista l ' t P „I.( Mr. CANNING was against delay. : in n 511( : - . , The Ignestion, ,`"fhat tbe• report proress," was The liOuse resumed; anal Mr: .itoshi t *. s ,,l i o f, ed leave for to sit ~ again to''' • . 1.° 1 ;,p05c 4 . The other orders of the day •Wirr` - ' 4 o '„e , _...... and the - House adjourned at half-pa, :„,..... 2 ,06 • tlit i P i then put, anlltoo dal • MitftP.llit). " i ,bo - g il d On Tuesday lad, by the Ilex. Dr: Lloyd, Mr' "i- OP "' of Ayl.,,bory. Illichz . , to Jane, third 4:n :ig ist cr 0 ....„,....„,-*/ sell, (.1 tbat pla,,,t. -----u - DIED. I Yesterday, after a loti, :rid piti'nful illness> -ti ' ... c V ........? ,..--' Simmons, Esq. of Pathlitigtou-Houia. . ---.--------.7' ' •I• , . . • COAL MARKET, Syria 9. rtic , ?4 , , Slay* at Ntarget. 20i Newcastle ... 5h.i.p1537.1d......:..4,t2:' 0 ( 11 t t ‘ :,... ; ') :' 96 1, (1: 2 . Samierland.. .... . 1 • .. • • ''''''' od t" ..,, .... ' ''' .. 264% ' 1 Cinders, ' - • 11.1wri,;Itl), A oo;' °" In di a . 13010 3..5; Suutb S ea St t -New Ann , . 4!L re jF:fri • r el9A : a 'I I ' t 141 1 , 1 ) I r i n i i ' u l _, ,,N , V 5 A nTit i ti t tp A s T ali r jr )N161!)INII:mliit;:::1;11171:1°1.:4e;11°61:111)' • TO-) PRICE OF STOC d'‘,:.d P pir ' I L 'lli, •After e hidPr bew iflbepr T 9 Which lOUs 7 uptett (in ,hoi t , (ik i r i t ; t‘ Pe I) .4dy 0 'Picket! %litre PI VI 11 ~"'^- NU 1 111:5 ‘,/!11