The Sun. — London, England, 1813-06-26 00:00:00

'came before them for an offence comparatively venial,- then their privilege's were asserted, and that person was committed to Newgate, In the. present SeSsiiiii; When g►ea"t charges were prefer _ red 'against the Diikes_ of Cumberland and. Leeds, and - positive - protif offered to be adduced , - 116 pro ceedings were instituted against them ; but when - Mr. Crogan was charged with a similar offence,. be was committed to prison. The things made him jealous of the House in matters of privilege, i►i.t lie was not jealous of any Member explaining he had said, when lie had been miSrcpre sewed. • When Mr. Horne. Tooke. prosecuted one - Wright, a bOokseller, for publishing a report of the proceedings of a Secret Committee, charging - him with High Treasou, a rule Nisi was granted, on the supposition that it was a. false report ; but when it was proved' to he a 'trite One, the yule ►was discharged, it being the opinion of Lord Kenyon,_ that in such a case there was no just ground fur complaint. Mr. Justice L►wrence, on that ocea • sion, stated that though the publication of w 14 4, • passed in the Courts of Law might be- inconve nient, • yet it Was so important to the pabli6to, know what passed there, as well as'what passed in Parliament ; that if a true . report Were pUblish ed, it could not be a matter of complaint, By t his precedent he ought to have been judged, and not of the King v. Lord' Abingdon. He concluded by bun ing a resolution, reciting the proceedings -Which had taken place in the Courts of LaW, - the 'defence he had put in, and setting forth that lie bad been most unjustly and illegally pronounced to be guilty of a crime for which he had not been .put on his trial. It was his intention to follow. this up, by moving for the production of the records • of the Court of King's Bench. The SrEtataa said, hips memory did not furnish any instance in which the House had been called upon to assent to a proposition embodying a long string of facts which had not been proved be fore the House in evidence. He felt it his duty to state , this, at the same time the question could be raised. Mr. Wytcstk.: did not' approve of the course taken by the Hon. Gentleman. He thought there Vere no grounds for a complaint of a breach of privilege, and could not agree with the mo tion. Lie had been surprised at the Hon. Gentle man's postponing it su long. Had he (Mr. Wynne) felt himself called upon to draw their at tention to a breach at privilege, be Would have brought it before them within 24 hours: Now that the Hon: Gent. had submitted his case to• the Houie, be was not surprised that he' had delayed it so long; but, on the contrary, be was sur prised that he had not delayed it till after the close of the Session. lie prot.eeded, at consider able length', to J et forth the evil effects to be ap prehended from such 1111 extent of privilege as that claimed by the Hon. Gentleman, - and con . eluded a speech replete ‘vitl.v legal and Parliamen taiyiknowledge, by declaring, that it' he wished to destroy those privileges, whichhe regarded as the strongest bulwarks of the freedom of Parlia ment, he would take the cosn'sc pursued by the Hon. Member (Mr. Creevey). For Ids part, how- . _ ever, as rib precedent could he found for such • application, and as he was content that their pri vileges should remain - such as they had been for thelast. 200 years, and such as their forefathers had thought it wise to establish, he should vote . against motion. Colonel O'HABA contended, that the lion. Member had a right to . expinin what he hail said to his constituents, and, ought only to be held amenable 'to the House. . Mr. WESTERN spoke, but from his expressing himself rather in a low tone, and standing with his h lel{ to the gallery, was not distinctly beard. We understood him to say, the 1 - lon. Member (Mr. Creevey) b ad -a right to submit his case to the consideration of the 'House, though he could not altogether approve of the Resolution before them. He maintained the House bad a right to be jealous of the Judges, in matters of privilege. The privileges' of the House had, up to the year 1763, extended to cases of libel, Lord A. H tistwroN thought, after the decisions which had taken place in the Courts of Law, the point of law was settled, and he moreover thought, th .t that which the Judges had decided to be the law of the land, ought to be the law of the land. He would uphold as firmly as any man, the right of freedom of speech in that House ; but if they were permitted to publish what they pleaSed against any individual, this privilege might be greatly abused: The Hon. Member had said, it would be bnr,l if every one out of that House were to be allowed to publish a report of what a Mem ber of Parliament might say in his., place, while the Member himself was not allowed to do so, nor even to correct that which others imperfectly reported. This, however, was not the fact. Ile had as much liberty of publishing what r passed in that House as any other person, and he bad no right to' more. if the question were pressed to a 'division, which he hoped it .would not be, be iihould feel himself obliged to vote against the nehh tou,. Lord C...AsTLitimmin thought it would be more convenieot to get rid (4 the motion, by moving the previous question, or by - passihg to the Order of the Day, than to put at once a direct negative on it. The, arguments used by those Gentlemen who had taken part in the debate were se . . very sa tisfactory to him, that he hadno what to add any thing to them. He wished, however, to offer one single observation on what had fallen front the Hon. Gentleman under.the gallery, with respect to the jealousy with which that House ought to re , ard the Judges in matters of privilege. His argument %vas u ve • r good one as far as it referred to the futkes of - former days, but it did not apply to the Judges of the times in which we had the happiness to live', When the Judges were the creat iires of the Crown, it might be proper to re gard them with jealousy ; but . at the present day. Nvheo their decisious were marked by purity and imieretitlence, he thought they - need feel no alarm, at the itlet of their pri;ilet,res g g. before them, their eonntry shoiiia.p ," to the ~titer t wEi;,Trtor, in explanation) a" s • not ineautto east oxiy.reitertions o n the,i tt i f i e , es hi: :: i f; the present day. _ tjt4lo eNplanatOty conversation ensiled. het weeu Lotll tatit4anAtni ailtt I.it. W. WYNNE. After which, Mr. Witeratte.th abl be should vote for the motion proposed by the Noble Lord, and he was glad that he hail submitted such a proposition to the House, as he could . not Vote for, •and should feel sorry at being obliged to vote directly against •the imition of his Honourable Friend. Some Gen tlemen were very violent on the subject of filch privileges, and others bad been. disposed to hold them very lightly, He had endeavoured to take a Juiddle course.' In any question that.might aria between the House and the country,. as to the publication of debates in Parliament, lie was 'con-, vitteett the House would laii, as it ever had and he must be permitted to say it . ought to fail, when it attempted to prevent their going forth to the world. This was decidedly. his opi nion, as he was convinced that nothing was bet ter for the conntry, and if this were lost 4 - ti the public, every thing would be lost. A question - arose, as to whether the words contained in the alleged libel had been spoken in Parliament. Ills Honourable Friend, .however, bad guarded .him self on this point, by bringing forw:a‘d witneises in Court un the trial, who .proved that the were actually those' .which he did speak. This, therefore, made the case of the Ilonourabie Gen-• tle,man that of a Dian who had been misrepresent ed, who was anxious to give a true _ representation by correcting the erroneous statement which had gone forth. He was surprised to hear the [lon. Gentlemau reproved for delay. Ilis Honourable Friend (lid not require to be: vindicated on this N.) re , as itinust be remembered that it arose from his desit a to consult the convenience of the House, and he thought he was fully justified in bringing the sohject under their consideration. When. the :tioble Lord spoke of the purity . of The Judge s , he would wish to ask how his Honourable i.‘rielid was protected against any unwarrantable state ;Dent which they might make.? Ile knew . notiioW anything could be more offensiVe than the lan guage, which hind been used in Court when the Honourable Gentleman receive& his sentence.— I He was there told, that he had been found guilty of a libel on the late Mr. Perceyal, and that he was disaffected to the Covernment. He %visited to know what protection his Honourable Frieil.-haa against this libel on his chariwter i If no one rose to defend the ►nanner in Which the character of his Honourable Friend had been thus at►i- niadvertcd upon (and he thought no one there would d e f en d it), lie shodhl suppose that it would be admitted such conduct should be arraign ed soniewhere... He wished some of the Law Of, ficers would rise mid tell him where his Honour able Friend might look for redress. If a Member of. Parliament were to be punished for giving a, correct report of his speech, ct might ic'contend ed, that considerable inconvenience ivould arise from the difficulty of his explaining, in many in stances, his conthict in Parliament. He however could not consent to place every man in . England in that predicament in which he would stand if a Member of Parliament were permitted to publish, without being amenable to the laws, any thing which he might think proper to speak in place. Under these difficulties, lte would be glad to cote for the motion of the Noble Lord. The ATToasmy-GENtut.s.t. said it was not his intention to hove troubled:o . c noose oo Oil, oc casion, as every thing • constitutional and legal, affecting the question, lhind been completely an swered by the Hon. Gentleman (Mr.;Wynue) and the Noble Lord (A. Hamilton), had he not, been called upon by the Hon. Gentleman who last dressed them: He noticed the distance of time at - which the motion was brought forward on a mat ter of privilege, and yet the Hon". Mover was not prepared with any specific proposition to offer to the House. This was a sing uhr situation for them to be placed in. What did the Hon. Gentleman 4ean to do ? • Did he mettif to impeach the J udges; o petition for their removal ; or merely to have tis narrative submitted to Parliament ? ln the way which he introduced his purpose, Whatever it (night be, he had not spared those whOM he ap proached. But it was not necessary for hill' (the Attorney General) to vindicate the memory of the great Judge, how dead (Lord Kenyon), or to defend the character of him who was hut a few hours retired from filhitg, the arduous ,situation: (Mr. Justice Grose), a character for which he need only appeal to every man in the profession ho had had Opportunities of observing his con duct on the bench, on circuits, and at assizes, while, during a long life, he had shewn that a more upright Judge never sat in any Court iu any time.. itc would now do that for which he rose----state his recollection of what that Learned Judge.- had said. Previous to this he entered.into it detail of the' course of proceedings in the trial of Mr.CreeVey, which it is unnecessary for us to repeat.— He affirmed that there had been nothing done in the Courts of Law, to question or abridge the freedom ofspeech in this House. All that was done in the House • (which there was "no danger w,iuld be neglected while the Chair was 0 ably filled), .was to see that, due decorum sty debate was observed, 'and that every latitude Of observation, consistent with right, should be per mitted, But this should not be understood to de= termine agoinst, the miserable subjects of this state; that; a MeMber of Parliament should. pro nounce an injurious libel against whom he pleased, and publish it, gratis, to the detriment . of a member of the coMmunity. These we.re in 7 juries which no man would submit to ; and if the law was not open to redress the person so wrong ed, they would have recourse to per orail violence to staisfy theirown resentment. Lie asked if this were necessary for the preservation of the' priVi leges - of the House, ridiculed the idea that this, could be'rotitended, and maintained, that 'what ever latitude of debate Might be allowed .in the House,it was impossible to sanction the publication of libels out of doors. He then alluded to the gross and calumnious observations in which the Hop.. Gentleman had indulged, even in his ,statement 'in the present, occasion. He had Said,he believed, hat in Wright's case Lord Kenyon had refused , stice because Horne Tooke Was au obnoxios No man but the lion, Gentleman would iive ventured such an assertion respecting a de ceased Judge, whose integrity was never question ed till this night. tie had gone further, and also libelled the existing Beach, with Lord EUeld their head, Lou'in )- rotob at every came 111 their , erson. • , tarn for censure. Lord Cllcubtirough had neverns -1 sated the di;cl rim! asseribedto hint that a Member of Parliament w.u; to ee restricted in his intercourse with his constituents. The NO . ble Lord had said, that such a as that,see.up for the Hon. Gen tleman, that under the pretence of •a necessary freedom at dehate, itul'a right to state his senti ments to his thmttituents i all the Kihg's subjects might be ,libelled, Was'nat for a moment to be endured. it was in fact a claim - to impunity to publish misehievotis aini injurious libels, without remedy to those• individuals who smarted under . them. With respect to what Mr. Justice Grose said, it was matte!: of opinion,.on the motion for a new trial, and not 'a part of the judgment.— For the sentence all the Judges Were responsible. The observations ;accompanying, it, were addressed as correction for the person receiving it, and a warning to others to avoid his 'offence. He ac knowledged that the sentiments of a person so far advanced in years ntight not be so clearly and per spicuously d'eli‘Tred, as. to preclude the, posstbi lity of theit being objected to as they had been: 7 - Ilat he contended that they Were correct in sub stance. in stating the grounds of the mitigated severity of . the punishment, the Learned Judge had mentioned that they were the suspicion that the prosecution did not proceed from motives of public justice, liut for election purposes, and that they considered the speech rather as an attack on Air. Percevaland the Government, than-as aimed at Air: Kirkpatrick. This w;ls the explanation that every feeling avid liberal utitid would attach to the address delivered by Nr. Justice Grose,-, 13y this or any other thing done by the Courts the privileges of the Hous.e were "not trenched upon ; hat the Hon. Gent. was taught that ;tootle, nuder pretenee.orexpressing their sentiments there, and then explaining them out of the house, ,should have the power of libcllinnwith impunity 4 Mr. Ca REVEY replied very shortly, 'amid said he wonld..do 'the same again ; Its he deemed it a fair exercise of hiSzduty. He maintained that what had been done, as the first step in prosecuting Mem bers of Parliament for what they wrote, would be followed by prosecuting them fur what they said. \ir. GARIlf* and Mr...WittrrzariAn Mr. 111 , ,NNR . ,:rTsiOirmed, 'that the words INCII by . 1 0t1; , !;4'Urtise, its he had taken them flown at the time, Were, that the :speteh (If his Iloa. It'riead %raii ‘.‘. bottomed on disatiection to the Govern meow' whkh Words he considered to be a '/ . .;r0 - ss aod,scandalowi The Motion proposed by Lord CASTLEREAGH for passing to the other Orders of the ,Day, was then put, and carried without oppositfon. ' EAST INDIA BILL. On °the Amnion of Lord CASTLEREAGH, the East India OW %vas read a, second time, and cow-. mitted for Monday: After sonic eonvekation with ,Mr. Tierney, the'rvnit of which was, that the debate' on the pri»eiple,should be taken on the motion for the tlpeakq:leriving, the Chair. Mr. T. wished it to 'u he nderstood, that the com m it ta l should not take plitee on the Same night i but this Lord C. said would depend upon the circumstances of the case. The I-louse Then proeieded to dispose of the other Orders of the Day, ;mei dropped Orders. The further consideration of the Reports on the ItOcers Bill, and Lind4ax ltedemption Bill, were postponed till Monday, • in a Qominittee of Ways and Means, on a mo tion, of the Chancellor of the EXcheqUer, a Reso- Intion was agreed to for raising one.million by Ex chequer Bills tor the service of Great Britain. The Report to be received on Monday. !the Deputy Iternembrancer of 'the Exchequei., arid the Ccnumissioners of Land-tax Bills were thrown out for this.day three months. The Duty - Free Goods, Funded Debt, Local Tokens, Peninsular Courts Martial, and Militia went through Committees, to be reported on Moutlay. Mr. W. Smrrn presented a Petition, from Nor wich, against the torn Bill. • A Bill to continue the Irish Fees Commission ers:; and a BM to expedite, &c. the auditing of Military Accounts , in- Spain and Portn t ;ll, were brought in by Mr. LusnitioTox and Air, ANsrr ras T, and read a first titue.---They were ordered to be rend a second time—the former on Monday, the latter on Tiresday.—Adjourned till Monday. CATHOLIC BOARD STATI9NERS' HALL.. A meeting of the Catholic Board took place on Saturday last. .. Tllg REGRNT'S PLEDOIt Mr.:FINN read letter from the giarl ,of "gal,. respecting the Regent's Pledge. Ins Lord ship stated, that lie had never had an audience or interview:with his Royal flightless in the presence of Lord Clilden and Lord l'etre, as had been Sup posed. That he thought conversations between individuals of whatever rank, or even the written report of such conversations, could not form just grounds for the proceedings of any public body. That if he was to credit the report of th e pro ceedings of the Board, which had been published in the newspapers . , and the speeches attributed by those to certoio resr;ftttble indiFittuals,, an extraordinary niisconception lad taken place— that he had not the. ,pledge which was -suppos ed, Sie.. • The ne%t was front Lord Clifden, eneloSed iii the preceding, and addressed to Lord Fingal:7 7 Lord Clitden said, that there Must be sonie mis takein the bnsiness ; that lie never had the: 4111101 w of an audience Avith the Prince in the presenee of Lord Fingal or the late Lord Petre, as scented to hi. snpposed, and th at w i t h respect to the ivr i tten pledge, , h e b a d never : seen The nett letter was front Sir Francis Gould, and stated that lie fonnd his name had been men tioned in the debate at'the Catholic Board respeCc nig the :Apposed pledge of the Regent—that lrc -had not the nmit militate recollection of the cir 7 eumstanees of this supposed pledge—tlrat frooi his not having the least trace of it on his nieniory, lie did not think it could ever have 'taken place, - hut that he (Sir . Francis) ever had a strong inpreSsion upon his mind that Itis Royal Highness:the - Prince Regent had always - expressed hiinself in very favourable terms Cowiirds the Cathollts of Ireland. Major I.IBYAN collet :Mt - 1g that the letters . which hail been just read Involv e d a co nt ra di ct ion' of wiigt r _ad. said oti a t:Ornier day it ' L . - t . . , respectia!, ti,! pledge, felt himself Called upon to say a ti . ''' words. He declared upon hi, ' honour, Oat: about five years sago he was called into Mr. fita , patricies inner shop, * w here Lord Fingal stlit("l in the presence of Sir Francis Owl(' and P'f O'Connell; that atter the rejection by rarliain!A, of . 4 Catholic Petition; he had seen the Plirr, Regent, in presence of Lord Cline!) awl j expressed himself in fal'our of late Lord Petre, *heti his Royal lligline.s' b ' in terms so extremely strong; that his 1, 1 ,, ship had thought proper to rominit them to paigti and that after he had done so, he waited WI .Lord Clifden and Lord Petre, to inquire wheto:,` the minute he had matte was correct, and that ttaf. had both declared it AVIS • Major - Bryan (li d I , i t Pledge himself as to the words of the conn'i , tion, bat with regard . to the substance lie st ii i. positive. He was not certain either, thatii: ring; I had used the word audience, nor We s vi i - courtier enough to know the distinction bet'" j ! the li d -audience and interview anti conversation, ct i ~ Air. O'CONNELL gave the same pledge w",,l;ti, Major Bryan had done, respecting what pass"' Mt. Fitzpatrick's' shop. Ile also kiVOlVelltlieilatv.l ra cy of the report of his . speech which 11•01''?: Pe4rea. • Lie %vas glad* to pi reel ve that Lord m ot gal's letter, when attentivLly )erused, (ha 11 1 ceedings Of a contradict what he had said. His Lordoii'ltl.l. ther e was no audit ace 3 - but he goes tin to 83yt%'.. conversation§, or the vritten report of c`;''' t „ t o. horns; Atc. cannot form a jnst ground for tne - . 4 1 con versation,asd a writi en report of it, A" ... t , o, cell thought this paragraph would not haylifj, public body: if there 401 not h, c 'e,„ l ,lt i.i introduced. Ile.professed niuch•respeci f" .I ,' ringnl , but declared that he should take an ,P; portunity of retineSting a distinct answer froini:t`l Lordship, w healer Ii:, re is : or cvec tea b y lig writ :en report of the.. sent.imints expros e ! ''' I Peince to his Lordship. COUNTY OE iiIONAGIIA!;. •tret Mr. o•Cos:Nct.t. reported from the ColT ' i.i ., appointed to consider the hest mode of obtl . ; c 7, legal protection for the Catho:i,:s. of this c ' i er ,i,A against Orange Persecutions. • ile r" u i l i n i i i;.cci• conciliatory measures to put an end to a.: 1,1 04 1, ing, and lioped that much ought be effecit"' I , ~ 4 bo the channel of some Protestant ikila,4,irjr.:::tßo- % . vere favourably disposed. It w , i ' s ne c'''; ll • l 6oii, ever; in order to give the Catholi" LI TI h e lia' l ! , protection ot the law, that money slicW'' . Air 4. r ol tu and lie - therefore moved, that it be rc'''' on, &t C"ulnlittec of Accounts to consider. the P I • of contributing a sum - for :this Plirl''' se " b i 4 l l ' Mr. CAROLAN seconded the 1110C1011, %; unanimously curried. 1 ALES • THE PRINCESS OF- W . — • ' ~. i n a Mr. O'CONNELL stated that, upon r iert . •,, . 14 al 1 / 1 0"` the numerous addresses to ber -- O Y-- i ~',l i 1 heel! 41. ' that they had been uniformly signe" O r % od d ( hie lie, therefore, pwelyrrl.l4 froth public bodies in England, it ,:aLr. ,hectolir, man and Secretary. the Address to her Royal Highaess Thr, 1 1`,` ,, -1 ,, the Chairman at vi Secretary ot the late A ' "I. Meeting.—Agreed to unanintousl3r. SLTADIEIt ASSIZES, HOME CIRCUIT, L or d ELLENiOROCCiII and Mr. Justice I. ism u. . . • NOO d Lo OLK. , , • LORD CHIEF JCSTICI. anon Otir,F ll . lgos.. • ~ MIDLAND. Mr. Baron plObiliPorcragiulold;:lusticeLr.B.t-V.A. Woo". Mr. Justice CHAMBOXnOd Mr. Bar o n WESTF , BN . Mr. Baron GRAHAM and N ~,At is. Justice Otir• OXF ORD. in ,i `. • Mr. Justice BAILEY and Mr: Justice 'i. ........----------...............-- , ,j, 4 An ixtraordinary circumstance took plra.Pato . alilandford a few days since : --A cat belonbil,7;o.o p"r person, came into the house, aml pot ',l ibel from her mo uth a young „partridge; s he s ie r t • and' the room, and soar brought in aot:itie, " 11 so cdptinnei till she hull brought iroo is si house nine, .nll alive and Well. On e I t I . P o ltal: tulittee d ea d ; • the i est are placed t uolcr 3 hc 9 ' l a ow e , s_; , is much care of them as if they Nll.' ll.‘'E°,ll:.ll)yrittilgie..Robbins, is derived 1°1" .1):::1).:r; whichl,-c signifits t i., prattle. The first ivoin,oloir, had created) for the • following reason : n'll''..llo, ven ,tr,reated the world, he threw t on 1.1,:" ,„ in..., .eive baskets tilled ‘vith prattle; o e i io d i. _"_:Pic.licti tip nine of thou, ‘i'llil st • A D ' t : 11 tiy time to collect the other thrce• . . . ~ ;11141.1s(3:e):k:iiiir:.eiliiiot:ijuidiesat.ii;)i-itrtat:..l%•teir,ai 'l Y :id :l e:-ItiV1)110(jut:11:41!)if:C. I LI : I t l i C :.. i' " F 1 . 1 1 1 ;i 1 letC.:ll,u,eilsllll: , in the County of Northtailln""' . , . a: . , l e t e (' ll )' :: l" , ::: "l " , l ,.: ' :i d" i a lt:r int S th I : e r e 2(7ilset:hrigYnecsi:tnr'l-ul°i74sufns e li'74 l e :: .r'l64.hiteA't;:4 : d? i )9.er h i: : :blf' ri tler t rti::4:uhl:4;;;l I[. ` t a tai i‘:,..t:i,,11,37 of Lochs,. Milt formerly ?Ile. °' l' . /. . to her !loyal I fighnes'the Prloreis Attie If! Lig .,, 4 1,, lico :, n tt Ei t dl c .E - ,. e ...:ii t itit e il o st u h - a e ,y s iu , i: l e ti : t i i) 3 e ,,, l i s ti l. l) e:_ i f , is,v.-4,14,kvittr!,:.... s it : i r f f:,: t )" ? :, , ,, 01 7,, „", .4. A kir , . ~4t lif ° :; a"vfir neu;itt, L's.i. of Coventry. 1.. - c w..- .nr:tr"fr,l ell e r tn the late Jants Lord Viscount Litford, loi n - f ‘ 0 -0 , Chancellor of Irelottit. : tIP fi.:.o' thi the i itli inst. at Whitby ' y voire pets 0 .. 31 . 0 ~ in .I. k- f ‘,...100 . , 1u rears, Mrs.-11.titiyerd, . relict of Lieutenantiv'f tbe yea, aunty years Town-Major of Gibraltar, 4t! n4 ° 0 lit:giintalt of Foot. , , no iti C ti l l :e• On Tlintsday, after a slort illness,' at l'is r°Q 1 tt'' '' (:tic (ti College; Sir C. Willoughby; Batt.' of lial'- ° Cambridgeshire. - ". Prie',. plis qltips at r.Target. W . AL l ISAltitipls‘;Esoill:l.juNF. 25. i i t „ ' 0 ,), mi- Newcagtle iS Sulitlerlawl ............. 4. ........ 4Es. Ou' '' .„.....--!** _-. PRICE OF STOCKS Ind y li g i . 13 5T 01 .0 1, R 1;, 9 1 / ".,! ‘ iis , Bank Stock, " - N4ry 4 :per Cent. shut • Old Ann. a Off b ptr Cent. 1797, • NOV di hilts, ~,,, ". °N. r 4 put CNit. 71 7O i "Zit Evelieq, ek dis• es , Pr' 3 per Cetit. Red, sr. i ‘9l 8 , 61 -- ,-4 0 f :3 per Cent. Cons, abut Owniuni, Jg :4 flank L. Anu. 14 1-16t 1 1 k Imperial Aont.. g,qi n. 4 • InAia Stock, ' Cow. forOpew I.ONDOti litt11)(01'0•11(1(:rAt':1* e , ioimates after I. I F.vtlting, 6 0 Wino l r , (f . 4 00 1, molts, Order*, Lette: s LONDON : Printed by J. B. c,k13...417A1i.t5, ', i t' , iiso 4 building: : and Ft:Mill:et by . .A. S:CILIPPS' at the SuN-Orr cr, Ne. 112, Str and : i' s poit paid), etc, lati*t. ' 1"