The Sun. — London, England, 1813-12-24 00:00:00

. - - LAW INTELLICiENCE. COURT OF CII.NCERY, Th:C. 23. OPERA-} OUSE.-..-WATRRS V. TAYLOR. Mr. HART, as leading Counsel .for the plaintiff in this cause, addressed the Lord Chancellor re specting the minutes of his decree; which were delayed by the indisposition of Mr. Johnson, his colleague, with whom he wished to . confer on the .subject, and which had now taken place. His Lordship desired to,be informed if ,the mi nutes had been shown to the adverse Counsel, and was answered that they were shewn to Mr. :Shadwell, and approved of, except as to the cir cumstance of having directions given for a sepa rate report ' to be made tipon. the subject of the plaintitisS'nmagage, with the interest thereon, but which he (Mr. Hart) deemed unnecessary, as there would be a general direction to 'the Master to report on the accounts and dealings de die in diem . The minutes were then handed up to his Lord ship, who promised to consider C.em this night, `and deliv;:r his sentiments . upon the obiect of the future inanagewent of the Theatre to-moreow. KEMI , TON, ESQ. V. EVE. The LORD,CITANcELLou, again menti9ned this ease to.-day, and asked Alr. Agar if he had any .other cases to refer tu, on the subject of a tenant coltinuing to hold over after the lettie had been r it an end to, except the case to which he had already referred in Ist 11. Blackstone's Reports. Mr. AGMs said he had other two cases to which to refer his Lordship. Indeed he might have had many more cases to cite, where the doctrine for which he had to contend bad been recognised, but he and his Learned Frieads who were .with hitn had been prevented from arguing theimint as they should otherwise have done, it having been HO. ;flitted to them, on the other side, that the princi . ple for which they contended was, the established law. Ile now referred his Lordship to the case of D 66 on the deniise of CO,llins v. Waller, in .7th Durnford and East, p„. 472, which only went the length of holding that the notice to quit as at the term of the expiry of the lease was good ; and svhick case again referred to a case at Nisi Prins to be found in- Ist—Tertn ,Reports, 1611. Wright v. Derby, in which mention is made of another case of Margatroyd v. Willts. The LORD CHANCELLOR said be 'should look into those cases, and give his judgment to-mor row, though at present he was poi inclined to ad omit the doctrine to the full extent. to which the reasoning which he here found would carry it, and that for reasons which he should mention. Mr. AGAR gala it Was not. ncy.Fssary for the plaintiff in this case to ask of his Lordship to •cart y the doctrine to the full extent tti.which the prin- ciple had been • carried in the cases referred io.— The Vice-Chancellor had admitted the principle of • Law for which the plaintiff contended. to be one which erns recognised in every day's practice, and yet had decided against thatprinciple. • The tour) CIIANCELLoR again said.. he should give his judgment to-morrow... LANGtuppE U. NELL. Mr. Li ACII moved„ that . , a 'receiver should be Uppointed in this case, to uplift the debts due to the plaintiff and defendant,, who had for 16 years carried on business as co = partners in the proles- , Lion of attornies at Lewes. The plaintiff, in con sequence of some misunderstanding between the parties, gave notice to the defendant of a disso lution of the partnership between them, to take place as on the 24th June last'; and with a view to this dissolution the papers relative to their business had been divided between them. The plaintiff had offered to the defendant to refer to any respectede person the adjustment of the ac counts, between them', butothis the defendant re— fused to agree to its the mean dine, the plaintiffs being satisfied that the defendant was - considerably indebted to him, with the view of preventing him` from adding to and increasing `that debt, by drawing out of the hands of ,their bankers the Joint funds, cm his separate,account,. had - giVen notice to the bankers not to pay any money out of .that jo;ut account, unless upon drafts or orders having.the signatures of both the plaintiff and defentlant. The defendant, notwith standing, bad drawn ,out part of this fund, and had applied part of it, and also part of several . sums of money belonging to the joiot con cern, which he ltnd collected since the dissolution of, the partnership, to his own . priXate purposes ; not only7so, but he ha) opened a new account in his tiWn name, into which he' had paid „mottles belonging to the joint eoneern. In these circum stances, the present t i pplication fora receiver and .forati injunction agaite,t the defendant, restrain ing hint from' interfering with the joint funds, till, no account should b 4 taken, was made to his, • Lordship. Mr. EbwAans followed'on the same side. Sir Saittict. ltomit.t.,y, end Mr. flows resisted this application.' An unfortnnee dispute having arisen between these two gentlemen,' who were both. highly respectable, and who had long been connected pi business together ; the plaintiff had given to the defendant notice of a diss.ohttion of . piirtnership which the defendant denied ha hail a right to do. That was a . question still to be set tled. . But. before it could he settled, The plaintiff came into that Conn and called upou his Lordship fo appoint a i'eceiver of the fonds and effects he hmgig to the joint concern, in which the present plaietiff and defendant lvere, equally interested.. ' an application tvlo ch therLeamedCoeitsel. were satisfied his Lord:014) %You'd:l.o'6e, uniess„ iudeed; the law '(-)f the Court Was, that where ever, in 'any case, a • partiwrship was at an CIO, a Treelrer Ilitht , by appointed. There was , not,,.' they. submitted, the least pretence, for this motion, es there was nor even an allegation miscOndnet, but what the defendant 'tech done: was inaiter of absolute neeess;ty,. and wbielt he was compelled to do 'hy the stet of the 'plaintiff himself, who 11... d rendered it impoisiblethat: he . should co'ritinue to pay the jointAnoncy into an account, out of Which be conl , l net again draw it,. fin' the purposes p 1 the joint concern. Having, hOweVer, lax:wailed on the bankers, to pay Wm, :It the end of the quarter, money Atifficient re an swer the ogiceexpenditure, and a144'100/. ftir his awn private use, he Lad had the delicacy to trans fer a sin4aar stall to the private account of the plaintiff': The' acenan, tfo, which•,hc had . open ! etl, and into which he liak paid the sums collect ca-by him belonging ; to the joint fund, was not an account ft om w hich lie drew any sums for his own private use, but solely on the joint account. Mr. LRACH baying replied, . The Loan Curolcm.toa said, if he were certain as to the facts of the case, the principles by which the Court would be governed, in disposingot such tin application, were clear and undisputed. The fact of the dissolutiol of a partnership was, of itself, no ground for a'receiver. All that the dis solntion meant was, that no new business should be entered into, but, with that exception, the par ties were to act together, and to be governed, in , regard to their conduct towards each other, by the None principles as hitherto, till such time as their' affairs were completely wound up. No contract between the parties themselves (particularly where they were of the prOfession to which these parties belonged) could put ait end to the hasiness iu whiCh they were engaged, but such business must go on to a final conclusion : and, thilu4h it was Common and might be convenient, as between the parties them selves, ivhen a partnership such as the present was dissolved, that the papers should . .be • divided be tween the two partners, and that they should each go on in future, each managing the business con nected with the papers which be had separately kept to himself; still, as to their clients, they could not do so ; they.lind retained the services of . both, and, if they insisted on having them, were entitled to avail themselves of those joint ser vices, till their business was concluded. lie did not say that there might be such peevishness on both sides, as if made nut satisfactorily might call on the Court to interfere in such at case ; but the Court was not, without satisfactory proof; to suppose that parties were of such tempers, that they cauld not meet together without coining to extremities. if there had been an agreement betweer co-partners, that one should draw money out of the joint aceount,, in the joint name, for the purposes of rice joint concern, that understand-. ing or agreement could not, by notice froth ontrof time parties, be altered ; nor was the Ctiort, with out distinct proof of the necessity of such a mea sure, on the application of one partner, to subject the other to the expense and hard Ship of having a receiver imposed nn the joint effects. -If,-or, other hand, it . Was :shewct that one partner had improperly interfered, and had employed the part nership funds to any other purposes ; if, for in stance, being aware"of the impropriety of which he ni'as guilty, it could be shewn thatbe had em ployed those funds in'earrying on any new busi ness, on his own account, or so as to procure fa vour for himself=—in such a case as that the Court • would interfere. Those .principles he should 4ipply to the present case, and should accordingly, alter reading the allldavits• on both sides, refuse, or grant, the present application. • COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Di:a. V. DOBSON V. wir,noN. In this case, plaintiff, who is a considerable woollen-cloth manufacturer at Leeds, sought to recover from defendant, a dealer in cotton twist, part of an average loss, sustained under the fol lowing circumstances :-1n 1807, plaintiff made a shipment on board a vessel called the Rochdale, bound from. Hull to Elsineur and St. Petersburg)), of a quantity of woollen cloths, amounting is va- • lue to 10001. Defendant, iVilson, put on tioard the same vessel 325 packages of cotton twist; of the'value of 151. for each package. The vessel having sailed, met On her voyage with very heavy disasters, and was finally obliged to put into Co penhagen to repair. ;Here the goods on board were taken out, and warehoused ; but. on the . completion of the repairs, the vessel was seized AS n lawful prize. UNn the subsequent capitols. tion of Copenhagen, however. she was restored to the captain, upon whom a demand was home- • (timely made for the value of the repairs. Not being able to pay . thls demand,. he was 'arrested ; and thrown into prism!, from whence he liberated himself by selling ten hales.of-thecloth belonging to plaintiff. By this sale he 'was enabled to se- Cure the remaining property on board; and not being able to proceed on his voyage, on account of the war, he returned to Hall, and delivered back hisfreight to the proprietors. Plaintiff, on ascertaining his loss, applied to deendant ,for his Share of the average loss, which it became . neces sary Co incur for the safety of all the goods , on board. Defendrint . .refuseu to comply with this demand ; and hence the present action arose. Mr. Toevita , .; contended, that .according to a variety of cases, in whieh, for the preservation of a whole cargo, the property of-one individual had • been' sacrificed, the whole of the property. thus preserved waS afterwards' considered liable to an average loss. Lord , ELLENISOROUGII held. however, that in the ,present instance, the loss complained or by the plaintiff had been siistained, not for the pre servation Of the cargo, but, for the emantipation of the Captain from prison ; and as this did riot come within the meaning of the eases , of average loss, which had been derided, the plaintiff hoist be nonSuited.—A. nonsuit 'was , accordingly en tered. CARSTAIRS V. ALLNUT. This was an action on a Policy of Insurance on goods . shipped oti board. the Simon;from Jaina:ca to Leith, capturckin her, passage homes by an American: privateer. Thedefenee was under the I.3tinvoy. Act, that the-owner knew she was to. sail witliont convoy, which w as " illegal, :and .COnSe. quently the insurance void. To prove this, Mr. ATTOWNEY clENia,tcsalled the broker who underwrote the Tolley, and be stated., that the agent of the assures mist he wished to pay a medivat remituu, .as it wits unc.,:rtein whether thc.ship would sail trout Jamaica with convoy or not. Lord iit.t.t.:Nnottouot said, this did not carry.a knoWleilge of the fact to the principal, so. its w charge him with having procured her Sailing with'. out convoy- 7 -Verdict toe plaintitamages 500/. Early in December, the wellAnown I►orse Sta ely, the property of Mr. (*.Alum., of 'Blythe, NottingharosLire, was fonuel dead in the stable by the groom:. Ile is sapposedito have been p.ii soa .. etk, but,by what meato,isltot Iv:9oEll4nd, rus nftt; DONOUGUNIORL'S nkm,y. To iiu: SECOND LETTER OF THE CATHOLICK 110-11tD. Knoalofiy,eilk- 8,15 i 3: . " the letter which I had the.honour of receiving under your signatore,,by last night's post, three distinct propositions are advanced on the part of the Catholic Board ; under the influ ence of which they appear to consider themselves still bound to persevere in those expectations which were already communicated to my Right Hon. Colleague and to myself; and to which we thought it our duty to express—With whatever reluctance —our inability to accede. " T 6 the first of these propositions I answer, with great respect, that I cannot recognize the utility, notch less necessity, of receiving instruc tious from the Petitioners themselves, for the di rection of my Parliamentary conduct, in this ad vanced periOd of the discussion, upon a subject which has so repeatedly engaged the attention of both !louses, and in the progress of which I have fought the best battles 1 amid, for the last 20 years, again and again, for the complete removal of ,all existing disabilities. "With respect to th'e secondgeound o*: argument which: has been relied upon, , l answer, that, in the mere circumstance of the preparation of a Bill, by one Ur more distinguished members of the Catho lic Board, in exclusion of their ParliaMentary ad vocates, to whom has•been reserved, according to the norm:Aimed ,mode of proceeding in all other similar cases, the province of effectuating, by suitable provisions, the principles and the details .•of their • own measures, I cannot discover that quality, thef powerful, ratency which ap pearetreo have been attributed to it, which are to gratify and to enlighten their jelloW subjects in Great Britain, and to remove, even front the minds of their opponents themselves, all injurious jea loosies 'and groundless alarms. " Still less ant I enabled to acquiesce in the soundness of that reasoning which would estab lish the necessity of an intermediate Deliberative 'Body between the Catholics of Ireland and the two Houses of Parliament, to avoid, as 'the Ca tholic BOMA is pleased to express itself, in the do~:iiiiic ifs t 0 altielt I am now endeavouring to reply, that perplexity and general disaprointment which are therein awed to hav&marked the pro ceedings of the Lower House; 'during the late Sessioo. An acquiescence in such a doctrine as this would seem to sanction that, than which nothing can he, in my maim!, more unconstitutional, the notion of a Representation of the Catholic niunity, separate and distinct front that of the Protestant part 'of the State—whereas it is to the Lower House' of Parliament, as representing his Majesty's subjects of all descriptions and religions persitasions, and to the Hereditary Counsellors of the Crown, that all deliberative powers are con fided by the Constitution of these realms, to whom it accordingly belongs exclusively, to regu late. and adjust all those details which will be. come necessary, whenever the wisdom and jus• tice of Parliainent shall incorporate into one compact mass of loyalty and good citizenship the' subjects of the sane Sovereign—the inheritors of the same rights, capacities and privileges. '' Your authorised disclaimer of the authenticity of those reports—Which have been, notwithstand ing, so widely circulated, us the 'proceedings of the Catholic Board—necessarily .closes that subject against all. further observations on my part. May I not, however, be permitted to express my regret, that the same great consideration for the feelings of those, who ,were not themselves present, to repel. aggression —(which then, us at all times, marked the conduct of that distinguished Mem- Iser—the energies of whose talent and mind, entitle him to so great a lead in illy popular as sembly) had not repressed some observations in the late debate, or' rather the publication of them,'as they must necessarily contain gross misconcep tions of what is supposed to have fallen from the person into whose mouth they have been pat— inasinneh as they are', so far as they afict to al lude to me, 'not less unjustifiable iat the insinna riot's they would seem to'convey, than unfounded in fact. I am not a cold composer of libels, or fabricator of injurious seggestions, against any man or number of men. My former feply to the Catholic Board, was the , creation,. of : that. day, at , the close of which it was dispatched, through toy Right Honourable Friend. To state it, in any other point of view, or to attri bute to it, any political motive, of any, aort or kind,, would be a cruel. mistepreseosation of the conduct pod the feelings of as old and as true a friend of the cause of any Catholic coniArymen, as any other now in existence, and such a calumny as this would pass throligh the lips of any Member of that_eiumunity partieelarly bad glace. If such is, then, ! the sort of authority which we are to a Seribe from henceforth; to the detailed pro ceedings of the Cathialie Board, to what, let me ask, does the Itublication of those proceedings tend, but to; lead!ttstray the public mind to lower ,and degrade, as far as in them lies, the motives and the conduct of alt those who daye to thir( for themselves ; and to disseminate, ntoun'gst a warm; tit jealous, and an irritable population, error and . mrsrepres'entation, in place of sound reasoning, temperance, and truth ? " If, however,-it is not true that any Bill was ever prepared, as the specific measure for he re moval of religious disabilities, and to be pre sen;,eil •as such to your Parliamentary advo cates, It the communication - to which I have been invited, was not to be considered in the nature of an instruction, accorling to which should be expected to. regulate my conduct in Parliament, there no longer exists any difference of opinion, thus far between Myself and any Member of the Catholic Board-- 7 t heir sentiments, on t ho le o f any individual' or body of Men, of whatever' religious persuasioo. I shall, always feel it my ditty to receive, with all due.atteotion Pod respect', upon all questions , of a public no-, titre.; more especially upon a subject, of which ant fully aware of the great magnitude and portance, tired which, oo that,aecount, demands,: in a peculiar degree, the deliberate, uncontrouled consideration of the High Court of Parliament, w h ere i n o l o ae the principle and the details of so ,0 1 11•16 X Ili eante can b .tuitat,ii temperately drratigett. 1 have the hollour to be, with much truth,, :It, your faithful humble servtiiit, " DoNoUGI-DiTtis. ; t. To Nicholas IVtahun, of the Cathulie Board, 4th 11ee." . . . • IloxfNa.---A. pitched battle, for fatty gniOcA4, took place on Lea Gammon, or Marshes, the . "' tame of Major - MEIN, near Cimobbam, on TeesbYt, bet tvelo 4/era/tiler Crossby, a.gardeuer, and Tims , . - Thggs, a coachman, twelve stone emelt, of repii'efi, coorage, and some science. ' t i m e roothatious set ~ to in "'l' London style; in an eighteen fret rortij -' ring, '-'ith professional seconds. Snow hendreit i, of spectators assembled to see the combat, tvi:idi lasted two hours. During the first quarter of liti . c l e .iLi i ir i l t et i . b l l lo i etri i i s i . ) a si s t; tit ti r e l len' , ll b ; elF tc h il l i l t 'i t g ; t r s" . :I i t I. :I v : : : sa a ud i: :) e ll " Y : gi r i : sl : . however, parried manY well. intentioned Ilit s * -- : At the cud of half mut hour both were !touch reduced, and severely hurt, but they :miternatelyil;' covered second wiml, and front ( 4-iigliting'. 1- commenced some manly and tremendous rallies- No men. were ever worse beat', amid .13ig:.;s tv"," l. innately declared the victor, his adversary l ot " 4 been beat out of time. Fooreans.--On Saturday evening, Ir t ' vec : t seven and eight o'clock, as' Mr. Bettis , 0°1 1: sides at a farm near Edmonton, , A as troll- 41 ' 4 ,4 a single horse-eltaise, between that I) l3 c e n '' Southgate, he was stopped by two footrai I one them seized his horse, and the other preseati ed a pistol, and with violent threats, tleto" nd ` 4 f his money. Ile delivered to them the contents o his pockets, amounting to about. 171. its -1 L1 " ... notes, and about 31. in silver. Th e robber.; "SI peered to be labouring men, and, from their tail , are supposed to be Irishmen. CO.' : . CORONER'S INQUEST ..--.011 Satilllitty last 0 - i • roller's Inquest was: held in 13road-street; 0.101,1 Market, upon the body of Mr.. hie ii Lewis , ": I ' 4l . was found dead . by his bedside, appareotlyliavTit, fallen in a fit, while dressing himself, to go to tsyq-penny post-office, Gerrard-street ,wher` ; and at Coventrystreet, in the time of tie! peoi, post, he had attended to take in-letters tot` tiel"l... atirtY.years. The verdict was , D ied b y the-116' ration of God. I',101!:' ) L P NGEVITY.—A man, named Samuel 1 . 40 ..- is now living at nigh HAM, near .Lengpor t, .. 11 1 merset, who is in the 108th year of his ;lee, ' t, " . ,.. enjoys all hiS faculties ; he never lust a to . ,‘,P , since he was a boy.; he is able to read time s,o , '" f est print, and shave himself without the Oic '. spectacles„ and goes to work every day at s"'" L ' employment in husbandry. Yesterdayoutatni;irr. ninwg:is,oatn,ss,evaen jionseerib!tellii,pear, firi: broke 'er; the spot within a t the engines, which were on cifjoueigibstereoebtt,a.Nifniendo,rieeist,hearnfdrobneitotti.pee aniumvigahsi;oisotiasnar. b rn i i i n a t , i i t in es g, af a t n e d r stork of trapery, w .entirely consumed. li , ;- lon i z two men were r, • kirily op j:d e ' dn Y ",. ---1 n- i o d i e set:vire of the itthbeevgatituua,btliciesytt•le (~fithe extens.eitt*: . covered by t he game . e- keel of destrnyiii&; . Jog Earl 'of thist-Bpreserve at West Clandos).,. near pheasant% in B . at t acked, one of, them lea- Guildford. On being . letic your; fellow, of . the !tante of llAltets, snap ot• the keepers, which • : pecl his blunderbuss at one crate I .end after a most desp , !.e' happily misset !ire, • me(liately and committed for t sistance, he was secured, . made off ; the other, a remarkahly atit-, 'Sessions under several charges. . .._ , . , I the Monmouth .‘Ji leap, where a small party of ~ . , 1 _ ~‘ . it by son e ~, litia are now stationed, was fired . t h e th : en Mondayt ilt el s t eveninga t io t l etl but lie was slightly wonnde the nightly assassins. On returning tlie splinter front the sen last,at f B o :t e r r s t:c % it e 1 1 1 1 t t) l L I lo°rcsjce -! fire io the direction front which the: shot cant` , and ii" try 'rl; o bs x a t. i ll titillisstti!ltel tllticalsvoil.:bli.ycr4 a second assassin missed tire at the sentry, . The and vigilant are not insensible to their duties, but are ac i ll the system which has .spread so much evil in P : 1 1 1:1:: e g r i t s b t e r i a c e s y s of so t 1:: .e I n i e . i i ) g r i g lo t :m i m 4 r e l o u : l : e t c h , e itt li t i t ._ ry, iu t ) h b a t t ii t i h j e o i n t i fs n t a tr i, geD4ntseciosn.tintte to elatlG tit :f 1 Magistrates and the Military in their pandit '•• • ____—'---------- DI RTH. • . . ;f e ut On Saturday last, at his house in Brompton, tbe vb W. itur,ley, M. B. Oxon, of a daughter. rIRIVED. " jijor On Tuesday last, at St. Margaret's, Westtaainsitert (tcr Drake - , of the With Regiment, to Mks Flue, Mo t of J. rane, k:sq. M. P. and niece to the Earl of F am;o3a DIED. On the 19th inst. at Trafford Houst, Lieut. , l''• il o severe illues, brongl:t on by fatigues ii; , 414 , 6 1 '"' Trafford, of the Ist or Royal Dr3goons,• ulcer a ,tediv t l e ,Te• nittsssia.• Its hint bis'faniilrh Fi Vt.l tAki41:44114 1..0, 'elusive- . #;: a f mo.it einiable di•lposition, and his frien6 to regret 1 1, u "" !. 4 mOst promising yotstig. Officer. - • Whir" In the month of October last, at Smyrna, Thomas .; tenoont, Esq. of Southampton. .' , 11, • Olt Satin :lap. the 11th inst. in the prime of life, No.. Scot, Army Clothier. , • ' ti; r. On Sunday, the 12tli inst. Nirs, Brooker: wife of ;‘,r. Brooker. of Dorsetiartlezh, BriAliton :solicitor • ' .f r . ' ; lit I' c ..• ' On Feiday•last, in Leinster-street,llubliii, the 1 1 4 Alexander Croulfliatilz. . ~,,, - • 1•1'001 4 .'" in tol„:_ie, - - Ott S,..turciay !warning last, at his residence. :. street, Charies Lae of the H. :e;. 1.0) 1 4' 11-. vice on the Bengal. Estnbll,lol,elet. ‘rY , On the inth jolt. at the Rev. 3. Eelte M 3 ' 4 ' a the Itl rear of bill a4c. On Tuesday I..st, Tt .qalitew, of a typhus fe.er, ye ars, Captain Andriw ,It • Neill C the B a ttalion !NAV , ~e 1 mutt. The same: day, ni Seyntour-place, }lrs. Vander ' e r lict of the late. iienkttnin \ .en tier Gtte;ht, Lirook-atte,:t., Grms.eitor-- thz W' Gt Ler 11 , o . ..“: P.,rtman-street. wile uf 'att.! ',.lategitter a I belate CuirlartAtit,Uieri. Yestere.ta. morning; ifter a f6v days at bi s "b otz IVelterbana in -nt 11-4 ho; 'llin; •'‘et ) 7 3 11 Yi n th e ti"' f nit age. :_t: , e ,;t PRICE Ok , Si-0C :S I,.STIIII.I)AY. dis r par, Is • Ex. IR.t. 1;111,•-., tis ;is. pr. Nvw 0'1111414., 1 i 014.4;'" Olcrdii.to, 164 114 Ingerial pri Opotiq, C,',.;.41 vs 3 Bank Stuck, • Nary 5 ptr Cent. stint b 5 pc' (ent. 4 per Cetit. 7i14 . 79 79% ('cut. tic.t. 62 6.35 H n per Cvnt. shut . !Intik 1.. .ITIII. , judi:i Studs, '•(,)N1„)0N • vriuta I ) v n . C • St., , r i ; am( :1 at th e . • • •'•• • 2. I "' :l i, t! , , , t • altlfot , t . g. 4°. T, A J