The Sun. — London, England, 1802-03-20 00:00:00

1... This Day was published, Price 4.3. bound, The Eleventh of MHE REAUTIES of HISTORY ; or, Pietures of I Virtu.) and Vice, drawn from real Lifc ; designed for tlic tr.struttien and Entcrt:.it.mcnt of Youth. py SyItETCH, M.A. Victr twvford and Ouseibuiy, Hampshire. tortilon Printetl for T. : I ,la-wman, X. N. LoLgman, j. Soatzher,:l. C. Law, R. I). Ziymonds, T. Hurst, and Lackington, Alien and Co. This Day 1, ,, 3;; published; in One Volume Svo. rf"FiE NTcessity of the ABOLITION of PLU_ RALITIES and NON-RESIDENCE, with the Em ploy ilium of SubstitUtes by the Beneficed Clergy ; &mon strated in an Inquiry into the. Prir.;iplea .and Comsequences of the Establishment of Cur:!tes., London : Printed for J. Nlavi•man, in the Poultry. 01 whom may be had, price 3s. sewed, The Church of Lagland Vii3Uiat,;d from Alisrepresenta, tion ; shewing the genuine Doctrines as contained in 'her Articles, Liturgy, anti Homilies, with a particular Reference to the Elements of Christian Theology by the Bishop of Loixion, by a Presbyter or the Chnrcih 0: -. Er gland. rove all-'things : Hold fast - that wif3cii is Good.. This Day was published, 13y Bunney and Gold, Shbe-lane, Price 21. r2s. 6d. The l'irst Volume of RURAL SPORTS. By W. B. DANIEL. Embellished With Engravings from Paintings by Stubbs, Gil, in, Reinagic, Cndlon, S., Elmer, &c. • To Gentlemen going to .the East and West Indies, this Work is strcnzly recnmmended, not only t . 9r the: Amusement it attbrds the Reader, but also . avail Artidle psculiaily well s'.!..iteh'for an Investmeot to those Countries. 'Chose Noblemen and Geiltleineit who have patronized the Work .are c respeatully informed, that the Second ti olume svill be plablisikr the first Week in Junc next. A RCHER and HAUGHTON, from Dublin, CA. Irish Poplin and Tabbinet Manufaciurers a. d Mercers to I-fer ivlajtisty, their Royal Highnesses the Prince and Prini;a:;s of Wales, Dukc and Dutclids of York, lYutchess of Wirren - thcri;; and the Princesses, No. 8, Henrietta-street, London. _ The elevated Patronage of Her Majesty, the different Royal Family, and Ladies of the first Rank Brauchz.; of t: and 1 , It is noped has : sntliciently established, in the , . opi a opinion of disceriung Public, the nocided superiority of Archer's and Haughton's Poplins and Tabbinets, Gold; Silver, ,rizurc:(l,. and Fain Chamberry Muslius and Italian Cambric Sarsenets tbr Court, Ball Dresses, Turbans, &c. to rorr'er it unnt.:;:eFsar,7 for that House to reply to the Adver— tiscolents vim lers; whose chief pretension to the trade is the Copying of their Aclve:tisemcnts_ - , , f () CAUTIN. : , _ . Whereas Archer anl 'Naughton have been credibly in, formed, that a great many . people in this kingdom Are now and have i-xen,, tor some time past, manufaduring and scl. ling Poi"tins and TaMinas, as Irish, of an inferiSi quality, uadcr Viz name of Archer and }-I2.uzhton's hlanufadory, with a view to discredit and injure their House, and a gross impo sition on tisk! Public in general ; they are determined, aS tar as res in their power, to prosecute to Conviclion any person ' cr persons so `ending' Poplins and Tabbinets, under the Mama of thc;: - Manutaaure, that was not actually bought at their House *.* Merchants supplied to Arnbunt They have the honour to acquaint the Nobility and Gen. ti-y-, that their Warehouse is stocked with a greater v ar i e ty of I,lourning Goods than is to be found in any of her HOuse in Town, which they are enabled to sell (for ready money) at prices much lower than they can be had elsewhere, the whole being of their own manufatture :—they consist of white and black Bombazeens, Chamberry usliris, Cambric Sarsenets, Rasdimores for Widows, Armozines, dress Bar celona. Serges, Lutestrings, Cyprus Sarsenets, Poplins, Modes, Crapes, Scarf Silks, Handkerchiefs, Bombazets for _ Servants, etc. also a great choice of Patterns in grey Poplins and' Sarsenets, for slight Mourning. English yard-wide Poplins of a superior quality, at 3s. 6d. per yard ; Velures, double black Serges, and rich Tabbinet in different Patterns; plain; corded, chain, and striped, for Clergymen and Gentlemen who always wear black; they never grow rusty or greasy in wearing,. being of the very best triple dye. - No second price ever asked for any article bought at their House. • N. B. .Latlies own Spinning rnanufadured into Poplins or Tabhinets ; Tabberays for Furniture of the. ditlercnt able Colours, manufattured on the shortest notice; DR. NORRIS's DROPS. ' ' LN exciriria :he public attention to these vallable Drops, an ::. - nimetatiot: of particular cases would be un fiec-,ssarY ; s:cosstni experience for more than • half a cen tury, navinB 6,lllicientiv established tlicir reputation, in the clue nf e\Pery of 'FEVER, especially tile YELLOW or PUTRID tor which they arc eminently distinguished. The Proprietor, from then- increasing celebrity not only de_ lives the 14glIestgratifi,:ation, but is enabled with confidence to recommend a trial of their virtues. The asthma, inveter ate coughs. scurvy, all impurities of the blood, colds, sto. mach, and :30 , vel complaints, yield to their benivn, yet ppw erful influence, and as a salutary cotdial in those'discomforts attendant on advanced lite, nothing car. surpass their Innefi,- cial etkcis. The Family.E,ottle, 2.25. is.only to he had at the Do&or's House, Lower Brook-strtet, Grosvenor-square, where Books of Cures arc delivered, gratis, alicl all Orders for Exportation executeo. Smaller Bottles arc Sold Wholesale and Retail by Nlcssts, jeboult and Co. and Retail by all Venders of Medicines. Also Dr, 'Norris's Anti-bilious Pill, celebrated as a Safe, and eiiective aperient, may be had at all the aboye pieces, in Eoxes at as. 9d. BILIOUS DISORDERS, OBSTRUCTIONS, HEAD- • ACHS, &c. DUBUC Testimony of the Efficacy of DIXON's .11.. AN T I 111 LIOLIS PILLS, added to the successful and extensive private praidice the Proprietor, as an Apothecary, has experienced in tne higher circles in their use, point them out as the most site and convenient Medicine for the removal of all Bilious Complaints, and for thosedisorders which arise from an irregular secretion of bile and free living ; during pregnancy they are eminently serviceable in preventing Cos tiveness, Sickness at the Stomach, Nervous Head-achs, Heart-burn, anti those rineasinesses which too frequently at tack the Fair Sex at that delicate period. Cases of their ex traordinary efficacy, attested by many of the Nobility, are wrapped round each box, with directions signed ". G. Dix on,"'. and sealed with his arms. • Sold wholesale and retail at Ching and Butler's, No. 4, Cheapside, London; also by Yielding, No. 76, opposite the Pantheon, Oxford-street ; Wade and Swiney, ; and by one Vender of Medicines in every Town in the United Kingdom, in boxes at ss. and ?.s. gd. each. *** Also may be had as above, Adams's Solvent, an ef feaual cure for the Gravel and Stone ; to prevent counter feits, Ching and Butler is wrote on the outside cover. Mrs. VINCENT's GOWLAND's LOTION, Is proved to he'the only safe and certain. Specific ever yet discovered, for removing all Eruptions from the I ACE and SKI N, and improving the most delicate Com plexion ;' but as Counterfeit Preparations are offered to the Public, it is necessary t o guard th em against purchasing any Lotion but what has the Name. M. E. Vincent signed on the :.abet on ca^l Settle; all not so signed are counterfeit, and One Hundred Guineas Reward will be paid on convic tion of a Forgery of her Signature. .A.fßdavit sworn before tlid Lord Mayor at the Mansion- House " W. Nicoll, formerly of St. Paul's Churchyard, in the City of London, many years . a dealer in Patent Medicines, Maketh oath and saith, that he was'applied . to and empkved by Mr. Dickinson, of Long-acre, to treat with Mrs. Yin cent, of No. 4, Davies-strixt, for the purchase of her pro inrty and in Oowland's Lotion, and that he was, em.. powered .y'Dlekinson to offer her an Annuity, a s a considera. ton to ir;duce her to relintruish and give up the Rreparingand vending. the said Li;ti7i,n to him . ; which oar th i s Deponent accordingly made, but the siche was rejeacd by Mrs. tiu cent with disdaial, she declaring that she would•not •p - a 4 - with or disclose the Original Recipe on any. account, as she was the, on:y Person pilssessed oithe true Secret of properly pre paring the said Lotion ; and this-Deponent further saith, that t.r.: :aid R. Dickinson bath sever it times acknoWledged to is Peponent ' that the Lotion, as prep a r e d by M rs . Vin ccut, is the Genuine Gowland's Lotion.' . . Wholesale, Retail, and for Exportation, by Mra,.. 'fir - Icent, ,ft No. 4; Davies -street, Grosvenor-square, Lon don. !2 . .;rt4,g".:.'brti Pints ss. 3d. Guinea Cases; containing rive Pints, Carefully packed, and warranted to arrive safe to try part of thu Kingdom, from No. 4 Davies-street. it is !rt.:wise :Did at bacon's, Chhigandß.Utler, Newbcrtis, Tutt, ".1 4 .ither-,;on, Wald, and 5 all the refutable Medicine Venders and k rriE trturs in t uropt IMPERIL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF PEERS, FR; DAY, MARCH 19. Thz ltnyal Assent was given by. Commission to the- t. 51.• chequer Loan Bill, the Annual Indemnity, the Expiring ' Laws, the Cinamoh Iluty,and the Greenland Whale Fishery Bill, a: - ,d to r 4 Bills of a privateer local description. The Lords Commissioners were the Archbishop of C. N. TER IlUitY, the LGHD'CiIANCLY.LOK, and Lord WAnsiNo... n A M. The varc,,t3 Bills before the House we:e forwarded in their respective stages, among whicit was the committal of the Mutiny Bill. Mr. ALEX.% zp. b: .:gilt up the Marine Mutiny 13111 from the Corm - aens, which was forthwith read a first time. The Irish Taxes Bill was also brought up, together with two Private Bills. Lord PE L p rOp Wed a Motion, the effed of which was; that a 2sles,4 ; e be gent to the Commons, requ'esting a communication to their Lordships of a copy of the Report of the Committee of their House, to whom the. consideration of certain papers relative to the Civil List was referred. Lrrd UOLLAND took the opportunity to inquire (and could rot avoid expressing his surprize at the same time, at what bad already taken place respecting the Kt se's Mes sage relative to the Civil List), of the Noble Secretary of State, what )ine of Proceeding he intended to propose, with regird to the business in question. kie - observo, that the Message had been-sent down some time since ; no sort of notice was yet taken of it, farther than to declare, that it should be considerd. Howe.ver, '.though he disapproved of this conduct, he seemed to think it preferable to following the very improper precedent of 1.767,, when business of a si- Milar nature wa , i hurried through the House in the course of a few days. in the present instance, he ellought neither the sense or dignity of the House had been consulted, not to say any think of a seeming . want of respeet to a Royal Message.— The 'only reason he had heard assigned for the delay a reference to the proceedings of the other House of Parliament upon the subject, which he; in such a case, did not think a _sufficient ground to-regulate the proeedingS of that House. Not a step had as yet been taken in the business, no attempt at inquiry, , or entieavour to obtain information on the sub ject._ _ _ . A few words. took place in the way of explanation. be tween Lord PELHAM and Lord KOLLA Nth on the question of the regularity of the proceeding now proposed; respecting Which, it appeared the Noble Lords, in the first instance, Misunderstood each other. Lurd PLLII4.II then observed, that a reference to the proceed.ings of either House respeCtively, was ip most cases not only strictly regular, but in some instances a great con venience to the dispatch of public business.—A proceeding was now proposed,' .the object of which was, to attain the report of the Committee of the other House of Parliament, which had sat for the investigation of the subject--I t was undoubtedly open to their Lordships' House to appoint a Committee for the consideration of the papers laid before their House.—The proceeding, in question was not only re gular, but likely to prove of considerable utility, as from the document called for, some important intimation may be colle6ted ; we understood his Lordship to say, that at pre sent he did not feel it necessary to suggest what line of proceed ing he proposed u;son the .occasion ; when the subject should come :regularly under discussion, and opporttinity would present itself; and when the desired information should be laid before the House, their Lordships would be better able to judge what line of proceeding to adopt. Lcr.d HOLLAND spoke in explanation, but in which he little more than recapitulated what he had advanced in the first instance, The Order of the Day for the further consideration of Crewe's Divorce Bill being read, Lard AUCKL4ND suggested the propriety of question ing the Agent for the Petitioner noon certain points resped ing the Evidence produced before the Court of Enquiry—ln observing upon this matter, his' Lordship referred to some details of the Evidence, and explained that the Witnesses produced at the Sheriff's Court, were of a very different de scription from those brought forward at the Ecclesiastical Court—nor was there adequate evidence produced at the Bar of their Lordships' House respecting the tact of the Adul tery. He then pressed the idea of examining the Agent, with the view that proposed. T LORD CHANCELLOR concurred in the idea of its being proper to sift the case, as far as was prat-lit:able ; but he begged to observe a degree of misconception, or rather irregu , Luny, which appeared in what had fallen from the Noble Lord ;- and this gave him occasion to repeat, what was his fixed and decided conviction, that in nine cases out of ten, where judgment was suffered to go by default, there was an understanding between the parties. in these cases, the De fendant confesses the offence, and no special proof is neces sary. In what had fallen from the Noble Lord, with respect to other parts of the Case, he seemed perfectly to concur. L a rd MULGRAYE male some observations upon the '• line of proceeding which should be adopted. lie seemed to say that the evidence already adduced, and then before the House, was sufficient to enable their Lordships to judge of the merits of the case; the necessary verditts in the Courts below had beets obtained by the Petitioner; and upon the whole the Noble Lord appeared to think it was neither con sonant to the gravity or wisdoni of the House to proceed further in that respect. Lord Au cm. AND spoke shortly in explanation. Lard C4TEICART seemed of opinion, that, the House should be principally guided by the evidence given at their Lordships' Bar. Mr. Richairdson, , the Agent for the Bill, was then called to the Bar, front whose testimony, and front that of his Clerk, it appeared, th i t..Mrs. Crewe was served with a Copy . of their Lordships'Order, on the teth of February, and that the witnesses produced at - the Sheriff's Court were, as we could collect, Dr. Hind, Dr. Moseley, and Cul: Macmahon. The above proceeding was interrupted, While their Lord ships received from the Commons the Irish Taxes' Bill, and the Felons' Transportation Bill. Lord CATHCART made a few observations upon the na ture of the Evidence adduced ; and stated, that he saw no reason why the Bill should not pass. The LORD CHANCELLOR then quitted the Woolsack, and entered upon the general subject at some length.-IWe regret, that our confined limits preclude, us front giving but a very brief sketch of the Noble and Learned Lords' ex cellent Speech, as well as of the remainder of the Debate]. His Lordship displayed his usual abilities, profound know ledge of the subject before the House, and evinced a warmth of feeling on the occasion, strongly indicative of a virtuously directed mind. He replied with great ability and efiett to what had fallen from the two Noble Lords, who took an op posite part on the occasion. He regretted, that the para mount consideration of duty imposed the paint - 11l task on him of urging that, which must be hurtful toNnclividual feelings. He made a variety of observations upon the evidence, tending to shew that the Petitioner was not entitled to the favourable interposition of the Legislature. To grant the 13111 he con tended would, under all the circumstances of the case, go to produce .a facility which would be of the Most dattgempus consequences, and set a precedent of that nature which_it ivas thC duty of their Lordships, as ewer guardians of the morality and religion of the nation, to set their faces against. The precautions required by their Lordships, for the safety of their proceedings, were guards little enough—they should take care not to make them less. He regretted to hear the idea of the damages being as a compensation for the injury in flicted; dwelt upon the crime of secludion ; in such cas, when increased by the consideration of its being perpe trated by a friend, no damages could be adequate. The higher orders of society should be as corred as 'possible in their conduct, and from his heart he believed that the shock which this Country was enabled to stand for the last ten years, was principally owing to the effeels of the example set to the people, by the Virtue, Religion, and Morality of their Superiors.—ais Lordship .dwelt copiously upon spine par ticular parts of the Evidence, in order to shew that the con duct of' be Petitioner was not such as should entitle him to favour at the hands of their Lordships,- and some of his ob servations went to establish the point, that no proorof the fact of Adultery obtained previous to the separation that took pike betWeeu the Petitioner and his wife; abstradted from these considerations, such a case should he decided upon general principles, no respect to individual hardship should ever be suffered to stand in competition' with the public Though he did not mean to itnpute,collusion to tire.v.; i titio t.w r, yet he could not help recolleCting, that the . * . iit*ient was obtained in the very way, in which it ain eases of collusion} of the worst kind. He thought also, that there was ad a e of intimacy suffered to take place - on the part of the Adultorer, which looked at least iike negligence on the side of the Petitioner, and which should not he suffered—on the particular grounds, :is, wel‘ as the general principles which he had laid down, he telt it his duty to vote against the further . progress of the Bill ; and though he did not deem the Petitioner entitled to thelavour he sought for, yet he molt do that Gentleman the justice to say, thasi he coftid not withduf einotions of satistatt I on, comfort aria delight, read that part of. the evidence whlch related his con'tki as a careful arid ait.:titewte . parent telii children. • Lord UMW? ohs:md shortly upon what had fallen from the Noble and LearmYd Lord on particular parts of the - evicktiCe. • Lord MULGA.4•VE spoke in favour of the Bill at some lenctli,,and in commenting on what had fallen from the Noble Lord on the Woolsack, went into sonic details of the Evi dence, from which he ingeniously, and with his accustomed talent, contended for the propriety of the Petitioner's conduct, whom, he thought, clearly entitled to his Bill. His Lordship concluded with a feeling appeal to the I louse, with respo,t to the situation of the parties in the event of a re*tion of the Bill. Lord REDESDALE, delivered his sentiments, at some length, upon the subject, and which seemed to be nearly similar to those entertained by his Learned Friend on the Woolsack ; in commenting upon.-some particular points of the evidence, he expressed his opinion, that the Petitioner had manifested an extreme indittirence on the o cca ion. His Lordship concluded by saying, that the Bill should have his ,decided negative. Tbe DUKE of CLARENCE, on the opposite side, argued with a considerable degree of ability in favour of the Bill. His Royal Highness referred to some points of the evidence, which he insisted were in favour of the Petitioner ; and as to the fact of Adultery, the evidence was as strong as circum stantial evidence.could be ; from that part of the Petitioner's conduct, so deservedly the object of the Nobl , and Learned Lord's panegyric, that which respected his conduct as a fa ther—he seemed to be of opinion they should infer his con duct as a husband, was also proper; of the latter, his' Royal Highness observed he had had aft opportunity of having some personal experience, by knowing 3lr. Crewe's family some time since in the country, when he never knew a more at tentive or afti:aionate husband. The Biskip of ROCHESTER spoke at some length ag•tinst the Bill, and cited various parts of the Evidence in illustra tion of his arguments. fie did not consider the Petitioner as coming to their Lordships' Bar, clothed with a •good and perfectly pure domestic charader, -as such Claimants should dos Among other points, he blamed bins for what he con ceived to be a desertion of his wife ; that a. separation took place between them, appeared from what he articulated in his Libel or Allegation before the Ecclesiastical Court, which set forth, that a separation took place in the latter end of the winter, or in the beginning of the spring of 1799, indepen dent of which, his Lordship conceived, there was not suffi cient Evidence of the Adultery, to justity the passing Q f the Bill. Lord Mu I,GR AVr., the Rev. PREL A Tr., and the DUK E of Cr..% v. CE, spoke severally in explanation. .cord AUCKLAND delivered his sentiments upon the sub ject, which were decidedly against the Bill. lie regarded all suCh proceedings with anxious jealousy ; but the present was one to which he could by no means reconcile himself. Its passing would furnish a precedent of the very worst and most dangerous kind. And in illustrating these positions, his Lordship - c;:patiated upon some parts of the evidence with great ability and aid. Lord C4t !WAR T, in arguing in favour of the Bill, took a de tailed view of ,o►ne points of the evidence nothing in which, he contended, slimed a neglect on the part of the Petitioner. No Peer could be more open to convidion tha❑ himself. Under that impression he had attentively listened to every thing the opposers of the Bill could tirge ; but he must say that - he still remained by his original opinion, and should vote for the bill being read a second time. The question was then put, when there appeared, Contents, - - - - 4 Non-Contents, - - - It Majority against the second reading of the Bill, —7 The question was. then put on the Motion that the Bill hi rejected, which was ordered without a division, and at,af quarter past eight their Lordships adjourned till to,rudrrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS, EP,IDAY, MARCH 19. ME USHER of the BLACK Roo summoned the House to the House of Peers, to hear. His Commission read. The SPEAKER attended .by several Members, went to the House of Peers, and on his return, in. formed the House, that the Royal Assent had been given by Commission, to the One Million Exche quer Bills Bill, the Cinnamon Duty Bill, the In demnity Bill, the Rum Drawback Bill, the Green. land Whale Fishery Bill, and several private FINANCE OF IRELAND. • Mr. N. TrANSITTARis moved the Order of the Day for the third reading of the Irish Revenue. Bill. On the question for the third reading, Mr. 7ONES objeded to the Bill, on the ground of its confirming the Bill passed in July last, for re_ pealing the Duty on Places and Pensions on the Irish Establishment, held by persons absent from Ireland, but said, if it was the sense of the House that the Bill should go forward, he would not op. pose it. _ Mr. ROBSON urged the same ohjeaion, and said he could not give his consent to the Bill. The Bill, was then read a third time. On the question that it should pass, Mr. ROBSON persisted in his opposition, in consequence of which the House divided. For the passing of the Bill, 81 Against it, The Bill was passed. After Strangers were re-admitted, The Transportation Bill was read a thitid time and passed. TRINIDAD. Mr. CANNING postponed his Motion for cer tain information -relative to the Island.of Trini. dad. He said a few words in a low tone of voice which we could _not distinctly hear, but we under.. stood him to say, chat he would take an -early op. portunity of bringing the Motion forward. A new Writ was ordered for the borough of Petersfield, in the room Of WILLIAM J R LLIFFE, Esq. deceased. Mr: N. ITANSITZARD moved for an Account of the Deficiency of the Duty on Exports and Im ports, and the Tonnage °of Voccoto for the Year 8o I .—Ordered. Also an Account of the txchequer Bills issued in pursuance of the. Ads of the Thirty-ninth and Fortieth George 111. and now out-standing.— Ordered. Mr. N. V ANSITPART . shortly 'afterwards presented these AccOunts, which Lweie ordered to lie on the Table. COUNTY BRIDGES. Lord GRANVILLE LEVESON said, ;s the sub jet had been before discussed, he should not now enter into it, but merely move that a Committee should be appointed to consider of giving Power to Justices of the Peace, for the more effetual repairs of County Bridges, and report their opinion thereon to the-House. This Motion, after a few words from Mr. SHAW LEFEVRE, was agreed to, and a Committee appointed accordingly, all who attend to have voices. INCOME TAX. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he rose in pursuance of the Notice he had given some days preceding, to move for cer ,tain Papers relative to the Income Tax. He then moved for the following Accounts, which were severally ordered : An account of the Gross Aisessment and net produce of the 'lncome Duty in Great Britain for the vrar 280 i, distinguish ing the Returns made td Commercial C,.,m.nissioncrs.. n An Account of the - Gross Asses;rnent of the Income t: i t for the yeauoiding the suit of April zti:o r, „1.; number and amount of Assessments on Incomes beloW2 7 to from zoo!. to cool. ; from soul. to wool. ; from t wads ; ; from zoom.. to soool. ; and from pool. up and also distinguishing the deduCtion for children. amount of An Aqeount of the number of Persons and the am" - ois Income contained in • CAC h Class, distinguishing the Su collected and the amount assessed. • Or th e An Account of the Gross Assessment upon Income Tod year ending the itii of April igot, distinguishing .Eng' s from Scotland, and distinguishing the amoun t of Asseiso mcnts on Incomes below 2001. from 2001. upwards, ands;. 3 distinguishing the Returns made to Commercial Corr sioners. titre, The ar Parish ,(lco nlr An n N i f tt ) e r ( e i n f t o ie R rc Thursday. ,hur i .s ll da w read a se cond y. as THE PRINCE OF WALES. had M g r i ' ve M n il o N t :: , : i z m ßs o S tit.:, r l r r o ei N ati sv , i e thdrevi the notice His 11 5 tr a p. Royal Highness the PRANCE Of t? W th A e L Cain Eslflors nesday, and gave notice that he should bring the Motion forward ou Monday sennight. INCOME TAX. Mr. ONES asked whether the CHANcF.LLI of the EX - CHEQUER intended to ground any IVl° 6° , o on the Papers which he had moved for relative i d the Income 'lax, as the Papers he supposed I f ° o r be very speedily produced, having been moved on the other side of the House. p s id s The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEUE— Z„, Gen he knew of no ground upon which, the Hon• tleman could found a supposition that for for would be more speedily produced because mov e d es on that side of the House. It might sornei' to happen that notice might be given previouslY moving for a Paper, in consequence of whi ch isc might be produced more speedily than it othe rc d v i s „. could be, but he would safely aver, that n°, - eg tinetion whatever was made in any of the Ont_ c er with resped to the produlion of Papers; they were moved for on this or that side cif t o, House. As to,any Motion that he might think P r o per to ground on the Papers he had moved ib r i thought the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. j oN Es), ha d quiesced, and that he should have heard no upon the subjeti from that Hon. Gentlernar i %ha the opening of what was called the Budge!! of until that Hon. Gentleman was in the posses s '% p i. his intentions with resped to the 'l2ax. 11 , i5 a nd nion had been long formed upon the subje",,, re nothing that passed in any other place, howeg - 1 , - , a ld speaable, should , influence that opinion. He s ', to state that opinion at a proper time, and leave I- 0 3 wbetn he the House to decide upon it, He had understfor, that the subjeft would not again be brought co ward until the Ways and Means for the ye ar we stated. observations relative s r e l l v a a t s i v p e r jek. stopped by Mr SPEAKER, who observed that the all° c ing of Questions to be asked was an inciulscricri but when it was carried farther, it became a Yr neteoedtihneg.stuovnia,tke,,svohmere) fhltivhse: great inconvenience. gi 05 4 A Message from the Lord's informed the PI ) that their Lord.,hips had agreed to the CAlerfirge, Non.residence Bill, the Bencoolen Bill, the 7, be y rican Treaty Bill, arid several Private Bins also requested a copy of the Report of the CO tee upon the Papers relative to the Civil 1 41,4Eil The CHANCELLOR o f tb s . .E4W l44 'i. an ti moved that the Messengers ,h ou ld, be called ALn or j,. acquainted that the House would send thei r ships a copy of the Report as desired.O rder e e The Messengers being .called in, were imo% c ir by the SPSARER that the House .wq,12.14 sc na t Lordships a Copy of the Report. CORONERS. ingMcre.r certain t a x d vi di A ti ß o i n N b a lo Fees s g a h n t up a dAilo ß w i a ll n : r s t g o ra c t p ropers, which was read a first time. On the Question for its second reading , ~ for Mr. HOBTIOUSE said, he did not then ri'd to the purpose of opposing the Bill. It all' e ' t r r c ,rice4 him, however, to be a measure of great iirlP°;i; tr but he should suspend his observations up o n the second reading. , c cona The Bill was then ordered to be read a - time on Tuesday, and to be printed. deans The Committees of Supply and Ways 91 ' 11 were deferred till Monday. Adjourned at a quarter past five till moriaa'' ,04.‘ ow° THE SUN.. taLlm QUIS D,SCZk rns.sum AuDIAI LONDON, MARCH zo s igo2l Lor a Tits morning a Messenger arrived at ca ve HAWKESBURY'S Office from France ; but, vie rreasonlO . Tielieve, has brought nothing deci9ive ccop. Tii Dutch Mail arrived this morning• f t he tains a very important article from Milo * ° of 22d ult. which states that the VIcE-PREs iiil : bi the Italian Republic has published a De_ i cre :bed, which the use of the French Almanack , is 21/%lsl,ce and the Gregorian, or Christian Calenda r, is "coo, forward to be exclusively recognized by ge ed e for vernment and People. The motive assig f t he this - measure, is, a respeet for the wag es 'flit People,' and especially for Religious Wcr shiP• v C i e ha s same article insinuates, that the French st i i r Go , been already tacitly revoked by the onsg`a AcCounts from the Hague, vernment. • . cit e ' of March 14 ' 5 Of rn that the Legislative Body have orderedthes': olit 05,99;549 florins to be appropriate d to P‘trtiCoo h services . of the current year. Citizen 1.', E5 : .0 , asybeesl-115 —...---- e i g ht, MA y orning, at a 'cluarter past cin :nrchosen as . Secretary of the Council ot ..c. ” ST r set off in his post-chaise trohn 13 `! j tile h_am. House for Windsor. H F . AL YI A J E. 6 Tl` 3 11. I . P AINC iSSP followed in the fotenoon. • .