The Sun. — London, England, 1813-02-27 00:00:00

oo tic same sohject, which was read, and oricrul to tie t.t) the table, Lind PALmegsToN poitponcd the inoiion of *hit h be had given riotiett for that day, on the sub ject cl the Anny Estimates, to Fliday next. On the !nation Mr. LocmtAßT, the Petition the English Merchants trading to America, presitted.to the last Parliament before the Ante—,, dean war, *as ordered to be referred to a Com mittee._ • Mr. SHANIr Dublin„ on Wedncaday,•present ' ed Petitions from the Freemen, Freeholders, and Inhabitants 01 Dublin, professing the Protemant religion, and trout the Grand Jury of that City, agiiiitst the Claims of the Rotnan Catholics of Ire laud. On presenting these Petitions, Mr. Shaw toid: occasion to observe, that the - Lord Mayor ofbublin, to whom 04 had been entrusted by the Petitioners, to deliver at •the Bar of the House, finding: it to be contrary to theirnsage to receive l'etitions (except front the Corporation of :Lon don, an', and now of Dublin) otherwise than ti,oufgh a Member, had committed them 'to him to present. ' They were, he most respect- . ably and numerously signed, though he admitted be did not wholly concur in the prayer of then). lie would vote ,for Committee, but would not concede any thing that could enchinger the Pria-- testant FenabliThment. The Petition Of the Dissenti l w Ministers rcsin dent in and about - London, which INtr, W: Booth pre , ient ell on ‘lrednesday, in common with the two others ivhich that Gintleman pre<ented, was...for the repeal of all penalties lud,di3ibilities on :ac count of religion, of themselves, or any oth , er subicrts of the rea!nt, and not against-the Catholic Chums, as :tats d by mistake. The Ordc',• of the Day was then lead for resum ing the adjourned debate on the CATIJOLTC CLAIMS. Sir j- C..litk , isz,r,Y did not at that late. hour intend trespassing long :on .the time, of,the House, hut he felt, on tilts occasion, his cluty'required f." him that he should not, give siteat vote.•-• Ile then call the attention of the House to a pro • testation made by the Catholics in the year 1783, abjuring certain tenets Which had been imputed to them. That they ha,) avithdrawn their names from this protestation had within these few days been denied by the ;',/r)rai,V Chkonirte, in answer t 6 an assertion' made by: the ?darning .Isnst, in I,vhieb it had been stated, that those who had given their signatures to it, had withdrawn them at the instance of their Apostolic Vicars. To re fute this, be read a copy of a memorandum, which Sdt forth, that the document in qme:tion having been signed by the Apostolic Vicars, had been de posited in the British Nusemn, D. 30, 1 , by Mr. Butler, Seeretary of the Committee, as 41 Itlooolnent ofpolitical integrity, The protetta lions had been extensively cireulatedamong the Clergy, atid indeed among the, Catholic laity, and not more than six or seven persons had related to sign it, None Of those who signed it with drew their signatures from the paper, or but very few, :Ind those not : through rialuctance .to sub scribe to-tire protestation', but.becattse the [sort=, which was Coupled with it (and. which had not been drawn up by' CathOlics) was not worded in a Satisfactory manner. This oath the Vicars had recoutinended to the Catholics not to take, though it had aniong its Aippurters seine ot the greatest Itoniitaties of the Church, Here lac quoted se veral c;;ii:ieit men in prow; of what be had ad vanced. lie inveighed against the part which the public press had taken id this' Controversy, and • asserted, that such was the strong bias ot itome ot the NewsplperS, that they would not even ad mit advertiseinent4,against the side they esponscd. ie snot that the Illornyo; Post , Was the £'aper 41- holed to lie then gave some account of two letters addressed to allobler,arl,w inch he liadpublislied;n. the Catholic Tie:aims ; but in this, as in other parts of his speech, he was so inaudible nettle Gallery, that it Was with difficulty we could aacertain even the leaning, of his opinion on the . various topics orl, hetonehed. We, hoivcver, thtder stood him to state, that he hail viewed'this as a great que;:- rim, of civil policy, and considering the value and services of the Catholics, deemed them Wortlly of admission to. a participation in the privileges be stowed by the British Constitution, with proper provisions and securities, Which might he devised" by the Legislature, and would be accepted by the Catholics. Oct the, subject of the Veto, he con tended, that the Catholics ought to yield that point. They could not stew hint attar in Europe in, which the Sovereign hail not a MI and perfeCt nomination ; and herr, where only a negative was claimed, he could see no good reason for its be ing refused. Unless this, was done, there was great Cau,e to fear dauw.r to our establishments from foreign inlinence. Without the right to in-, specs hulls, briefs, and rescripts, be could not con sent to give the Cataolics political power that cult°tit be incurious to the State.. He did not wean that such docutnents should be scut to the Secre tary of State's Offie, but some cif their own Ec clesiastics, in whom they and theGoverument had -icirtfidervai, Might lie appOilited to perform t dAty. Even Our Catholic 1-111Ce8tOrS were in the con“ant praCtice of in oviding guards and 'ties against the encroachments atilt Pope. Mag, tea charta, the Statute of Vrentunire, and' several oilier enactments, he instanced as proof of this lhit all these things a Committee alone roulil arrange and digest.. Not a Committee of the whole House, hut a select Committee, which wean the best adapted to carry the matter to a right eimelusion, to discuss the: extent of The privileges that ntiOt be granted to the ''clitholies, and tilt nature of thb securities and guards against the Influence, he - would stay; the growing influence of t.lie Pope. ,- For this reason i.e gave the iitotiddhig cordial suproi t. Mr. 't itne, said :a few N) : ° . ords, in explanation ot some point‘ott .which the last,spealter had an-scon- cei vett it i m • thlteroi Nj A viltr,w thont4 . ht little remained to be added t 6 tbe spco.,:bv made by Mr.Grat tan Ad l'iunLett. The Litter `!ia<i, diiplayed on thil subject liktorical facti, * Were lie% el' belovo i..orsvni . country, and )vied t 4,11%c' f re , e tm . Ere 'was diger rt 2 (4 fll A.! rrom that. Hon. Gentle MBll' MI6 or two points. Ire differed from him as to. the grant of emancipa tion to the Catholic's, with athple.securities-to the Church of England. He asked if ever ~ tny man had Made out in his own mind. what, these .4ecuri ties were or could be. He never could learn, and now wished to know what were to be the words in the bond. Hewes convinced that no securities should be asked beyond the oath of alleg.ianee— that was enough ; for if the Catholics would. break that, they would infringe any .securities. — He also (lidera from* the Honourable Gentleman (Ms. flunkett).on the 'subject of provision being made for the Catholic clergy. He_ was sorry that had been brought forward, as it Must be known that the question had been (liseusted by this Ca themselv(is, end thetishOps intdpnne tra a determination not td - nreept of any provision from the Government,' laity to depend esitirely on flock.—(Here a, Menther raid No !) The lion. Gent. was mistal“ni'; he meant the state of things in 1799, but all that was done away now. For his part he thought the Government ought 'not to have4his influence over the Catholie' Priethood. Their infleeisee over the l'ote.tailt 'Church tv:ts great, and with the addition of the 'Catholic Choral at their back, they would Soon become des potic. Neither could he agree with the Honour able Bafonet below bins (Sir John Cox Ilippis iey) respenting the Veto. If they ,. gave up, the V eto , therk, 3l3 l,l b e no longer Roman Catholics, but might he c:;ited reto 7 men., by‘v'hicii name he hoped they would - be etslied it ever they surrender ed that principle.. He recommended conciliation; and the removal of all hostile kelings, by a full' grunt - to the Catholics o;',what theyrequired. Au Hon. Gentlenian on the ii(u,r, • (Mr. Bank(-.„), and Gentlutnen on the. otaer side, by;acts mis OSsertiol), hfld argilvd, tkr:7 thi,; ytu f hoer. the Chnrch and Stiae. !int goi . i4o the Committee to see what eoeld he done, though the preservation of the Country dk t ;eritled.epon, 0 matchless ignot'ancel“ 0 matchless intolerance ) But nine-tenths of Ireland was of a different way. of thinking : , and in favour of emancipation ; indeed except the Gove;nment, which was' there treated with the contempt' it deserved, for its eon tinned intolerant imbecility from one end of the year to the other. In this it was, that every County Aggregate Meeting was anxious for it s overthroW. Tais Government' excluded .5,090,000 of . peciple fare the purpo.c of exalting a few Vl:mita persons already too much aggrandize ad. , lie neN • t alluded to • the Anti-Catholic Petitions, end affirmed that they bad all h,:en car. ried in a clandestine way. The South of Ireland, and particularly the great and independent county of Tipnerary,, which he hatl,the honour to,,repre sent, proved this fact. .The Catholics of Ireland (leucite(' well of this Countr ;, they furnished more men for the • defence of. the _Kmpira than England, which was called the Mother Country, and"did not merit in' be governed as they were now, by pains, penalties,,, and the bayonet.— Take means to unite them, and there woitlti be no.need to employ foreign soldiers in our service. lie would even state to them how they might do away with.the - whole of the impressment service : enrol ciae or two ant, of every faMily, and, estite Wish parish,hundred, and eoutity schools, and a depot af some considerable isavol town. Thus, and by giving . a bounty, they would 'have their Navy completely manned without recourse to that odious measure. They w.ould also have no need of.,Potrugtrese, Russian, or German troops, but have plenty' of brave Irishmen to fight their bat ties: lint they pursned an opposite and bad po licy, which hail within these 8 ur 10 months put an end to recruiting the army except through the for the lower orders of people had now been taught then. degradation hy the Catholic boards, and would not enlist as formerly.. With. respect to the tone, violence, and intemperance imputed to some bodies and itulividuils among the Catholics, it appeared to him, that this afforded a good yea son for' coucediog, which would take the tools from the hands of factious demagogues. 'Doaway the 7h:lf:snots' affect,ing five millions Of people, and they would be for you, instead of being,,to. the aggrieved always were, diseontented., Hilt he defiled the, fact. The speakei.s might hays been violent, but they Were never unconstitutitinal, or they could not have escaped the vultUres, the tellites of the Castle, who Watched over the ta t o detect any error they mightsominit. , He declar ed, that in his opinion, the Catholic Hoard had not gone far enough. :They had gone on pe titioning since the time of the Unhin, instead_ot demanding their rights l, and he would say, that in Tipperary he had tried to get. them to petition as a right, and not to deinand as a boon.) A lads at tly!. lien. Goalentio's trao,sposrd,o4d inis applh!ci his ivords). He then, concluded hi;i, speech by going into a curious, history of ,thei.wars of King James 'the 2d,.the Amttle,of the Boyne, and the treaty of Limerick, to rote that the Catho lies had st right to `c entails ipatnin untrudifie'd, unrestricted, and unrestianued.) Sir EYar, COOT spoke in favour of the conduct of the Catholics. Their loyalty had been shown.on many occasion,. As one inntance, be. adduced the conduct of the expedition n hick sailed from Ireland irr 1793,,, under the command of Si: Charles grey • three-10111.0s of the men employed in that expedition were Roman Githolies. ,But why should he mention any one instance, when so many were to be found, which proved that the Catholics Of heland were at least not inferior in point of loyally, to any body of men in the Bo oth dominions. To be , assured of this it was only necessary to refer to those places where their loyalty bad been proved by their actions. in Egypt, in Holland, and at that time on the Pen insala, the Catholics, (who formed so large a proportion among the British troop) had partici pated in those actions which kad been so glorious, and the fame of which had spread far and near. H e concluded by observing, that he abstained from giving an opinion upon their claims but be wished for a Conunittee to investigate their claims, that it might be seen whether any, and what, measures for their relief could with safety be adopted. Sir N. COLVIURST said, that,he should certain- ly vote for submitting the Claims of the Catholi cs to t h e eonilikratinn of a Committee, pursuant t 0 d Tl-10MAS \MOD, of , Nft. 112, Stratul; ! eard rti Lti r i g, No. I 12 wl,cre iiiive , rtiselnen‘v, o r d er , fo, • the Resolution of the late Parliament. Although a Resolution of the last Parliament was not absb lutely binding on their succesers, vet so lone as the circumstances which had ted to it remained the same,—so long as the import ance of the.mnt ter was unimpaired, they were :certainly in duty bound to carry. that Resolution into effect. Al- . though a good deal -had `heels said about the tone in which the Catholics had pressed their clams, be did not conceive that to be of consequence, as affecting the nature of theCmicession s - which they req u i r ed. E ac h po in t of the question should be carefully and seprately investigated by' the Committee. After the investigation, Parliament might say to the Catholics, ‘f we have exami ne d your Claims, ;In d we have iissigned to you so and so.“ Thus the matter might be finally adjusted to the satisfaction of all parties. lje voted for. such an investigation, as he had said,- because he thought ,that justice tit a it. But he gave his vote with the reservation of forming what opinion he might thin]; proper, on any future measure. . , Mr. :HART DAVJES could not consent to the House going into a Committee on the Claims of - the Catholics, without those safeguards which were necessary for the' security of Church and State. These resolutions ought to be not only proposed; they ought to be carried into effect., Another objection which he had to the House go , . iog into a Committee on that question was, the disposition of hostility which had been mintifested , by the Roman Catholics in Ireland, both in their speeches and in their writ:l)gs; The object of the ,Catholics was not toleration ;.,-that they had a right to, and had of course obtained ; their ob ject v.-as the.possession at political pn,wer. That Could not' be graided to theta with safety, on ve count of the incroaching disposition of the body. Oispositiou to incroachinent had , beeit mani fested by their conduct on insist occasions; and, pioticul'arly, in the Claids which they had made. a consequence of t'hose. Claims, many concessions had been granted to them ; but every concession . had engendered s ome new d elnan d . These were the grounds on Which lie should give his vote against the Committee. • 7- Sir ball' STEWART spoke in favonr of the mo ("crate measures which had -been proposed by an Ivlember. 7 - 7 (We unde6tood that he meant Mr.yltinkettY. Mr. WART) spoke in favour of referring the Claims to the consideration of a CoMmittee. W. - Fitrzoer,ALto was glad 'that the state of the question was such as . it was,: at. that time, be canicit gave him and many, othets' an opportunity of, expressing pehlicly ,their sentiments .on that great .question, which was the sobject of the tiro•:% tion then hefore theHonse. it fortunately waS not con4dered as at Party question : although it bad been treatedrs ouch for many years„and.bad in Consequence remained so long undeeided.--;-- some persons, who were iniuneal to the Claims . of the Roman Catholics, had referred to the Acts of former Parliaments as the means of judging of the danger of yielding to the claims which were pressed upon their consideration. He pro tested against invoking the inbtries of for iner ' rarliaments to terrify persons, against the, concession of those , claims "which were made by the Catholic; of . irclaud. Think ing, .as he did, that I'4i - timer - it were bound at least to consider their claims, be . , should give his vote accordingly. But, when h e advised the matter to be considered by a Comiiititee of the. House, he did not think: that It was the duty of Parliament—it would not become them., to imp - date or to treat with the Catholics ; When con cession ghouhi he agreed npon, it Wchild tae for Parliament to make.the term* and,stipnlations of that conces,ion When be voted ...for a Commit tee, henid • not bind himself to any specific act. But be wished the horrie to ga o into Comthittee, because lie Was atkiinated with an stn ,ion desire t have' the inatter finallwdetermined. While KU would be.granted to the - Catlidlics, that could be with sa,fety: conceded, pi:4er means would of course be taken to securA the Protestant estit blishments. He said that he Should not have par ticipated in that debate, bad it not been that, con-, sidering the office which he had the himour to hold, he conceived it to. be. his duty 'not- to give 4 silent vote On a. question of bitch import ance and interest. The et:induct of the Catholics had More than once been entitled to ; no - ithre eaf popularity should Make hint conceal his opinion on that subject ; he. thought, that their conduct had been,tnarked. by a degree of arrogance and intemperance almost intolerable. But, however IntemPeritte their conduct had been, they had suffered for it. Yet admitting that' the cwt.- duct of ,the Catholic Committees had been nutragttou3 and presnmptuous, was Parliament hound to visit the transgressions of a few in temperate individuals 'upon .the NVIIOIe body of Caiholies? Besides, the proceedings of tbcau person§ could not be considered the elm racteristie of thediSposition of the C a th o li cs ii i general. It had been said by some Members, that the PetitionS Which had been presented to the House, did not speak the "Sense of the People. Stroug a; his opinions 4 i . trib, l s ebuld . not refraM finin saying that duringlhe, last 'year there been matiiietited by the Protestants of Ireland a greater indisposition to the Claiins of the Catho lic -8, than had been STIOVII 4)3 any, former occa sion. 'But he could not 'help thinking that the tone which had been assouied by the Catholic Committees,' had been - made use of to inflame the minds of the Protestants against; them. It had been said that the Goverument of Ireland had, by means of publications endeavoured to exasperate the pub lic mind against the CatholieS,± That unfounded' and caltintnious aspersion, had been on former oc casions openly refuted by the different Members of the Irish •Government. He hoped that. the Home would adept of his vote: in tavuar of ,the . Committee, as aproof of , the falsehood of .that calumny. Respecting the securities which should, be required of the Catliolics lit thought that the donlestiol-noruination of Bishops would be one very good security, by detaching the Catholics front the connection Which they hail with foreign powers. The mo'st effectual Security, however, would be to conned the Catholics to the conntry, by interest, gratitude, and pride. ' How that-was by WILLIAM AIIMIGETI SCRIM'S, south Melton stmt, Grom'"°r"'""Rr"' tie J'aver. Letters fur the Editor, &v. (post pc/4), must be addressed. Barr 01) tlondav inorninz, at his liouSe in 0 of Lady of J. f Massy 11itse4col, Eqq. of a Sv c i l , On the 1, , . - 31 inst. the Lady of rin'rcnl street, Itussell-squate, of a l he — o l liter '0 On Monthly Ihst, at I).,wlish, in Der""i' t1 11,0 , 100 . George. Eiq. of Bah-Jai:es, Ken! , °, p oi Late.iy, in Mount joy-square, f t - I• Esq. M.l'. of al/aught el Lostely, at Holyin ook,' iti the Count!' pf • 0 , 1 f t C 3 % h:te a n iter 14:a d i ta i r g7 in , (if t' &JARMO , . „ At AVaymouth, on •Tbarsday, the I , '" yr ota ti r Frederick Beadoia, Canon of t‘',. 11 3 , .fo l.ll the COLltitv Lt . :llilit-:;,,,each :OCI the South Hants 10 0-1 Mil' Buchanan, only daughter of •• 1 • 4 " U t i tigs, Pr. ()11111 V 4 0 1 11141. at St of Cants Collatv, ; rat Rey. Thoomi Jut ell, it- of Fret' . lOW Of (:,)rpits College, Comb'. On Ntoriday last. at Lyousba,ll, kir 1, • son, Esq. of Lincoin's-itni, to ?. i.- of go ll 6ll White>moe, lasq deceased , P'' that Parish. O W , n ednesday, at St. Cleorge's, Somers Cocks, t a A giiete, • Non. It. PpleCiir, P. of AntonY'4`; On Timrsdv. cs, i!l4 . rinnple, Es -Gen, e l I t 1 .1 es aug.iter - otin - Wee% In IN.9ernber hist.. ill the 1. 1 . qeet ht. d, of the ft0),41 d ull ' Esq. 9111. at 0:1 Ttre,!”,. , taorning.. III,;Itonse after„ t .1.)1r; tr.r , ‘. tin, ( ;Jorge , o r the ult. at tilt; b e d-:ittart c z ! 4l , * ft( the llriti4ll mt. Poittmail th c L. lO omte, (Fl:4)l4in to the En e ''' do.n,l;rry, . C(l..tia NIARN.Ia:VxkI" 01' Ships at Marxet. Ship* sold. a si i 14JI Newcastle..... • 10 1" • • •• . 51° ' - I Si110C:441141 .. .. . .... • • • PRI(E. OF STtX Bank Stock, 2191 lilt) MI I'4:avy 5 per Cent. Irish 5 inir Cent. 4par Cent. 75 3 per Cent.lted. .19 591 59 pei• Cent. Cthii. tktak L. Ana. 16 9-11thst India Stock, • )ri f i,r It ' iti P', A .C °l' cli, . KS 2. 1;01/ *F , indilkagillfil4 Old 1 4, ii,tchr64, Pro 4°".,00. „ei 40 1 - i 3 , Of er :B I, ~01 foil) Atil 3m gati, $. me tl 1 ' . 40 ) 16% HIGH wATEit tosuos 0 11 P -, - 4,6 Alurning.lo mimutrs after 0. I :vl.,""' ~.; :. .. ~.rntl to he effetle•l, uhether,- .he :tipen3::, Or Parliament , it wonld be tiie bt . iik o ' dth ! lj .i. ' . m a at soe Gtli tinte, lo deter !dine: to-lit: ine: it , si? " ,.. '',,, to knot - aim suO.cient rr..:-an were , ile.woultl not, t that titae, dwell efi til t .' ~ t n i t o a r i t y p re i 2. t , : r ie d ii l l , ; .;: t i.11 ) islsit.?,(;,:t.,i,)!liiel s ic 13 n i t:r ca o t a t., ( !_ r i i f. Should leicre'l7is -cmintry awl coniat o i '2 f - I l e had always thought that peopiew6e •A' . I to conS'Aler the tlan4er of the cloctl; l C s ca , ~.` Chilreli of Itozne in au exakgeraterl poiut_olt., Tile tenets of the Presbyterians.of SO tll3 , sprung from Puritanism, which hat( tit whichnany i.:,,:tvlearienit:)ers ;,ilieLii;,gilslttiu,li,,anagnecil,(t)littse Li d :4 , ..., ~., i t i Yet no dangers , had, enineti if ow, thee Went of Presbyterianism in Scotland, , ` ,:,: ...i. protected by . the Crown. 'There was, t° , , .. f r! r ° on r i eas r a ti n titi :. ; asPitiiiiriclahreaidiniiiinniTiithi:sli t e o °tllst;: ''.ll Catholics in Ireland, as,thelloctrines of t' ,2 :: . of Rome bud not in them those terra L, ~: Church of .ScOtlaud had, at the t irae , 1 ,,10,4, 1 hlishmeot• Ile concludbc f b y saying, ""100. his vote for a Committee not to Te !; 1 0, - : pled .e wljeli he had given b\- '064 1 - 0. , solution passed in the former Parlisole°ll . tia to . I gave. •M it from conviction. . . the I , , r PROTH.CROE is adT.inSt W 7 enintnittee. t, t,2l3 i l :S i fliuirrrit'l.,)3.l'‘):4u..r}::l-11on:stiPloieolisuknalea,iirdiinb., be c a h:a ti m t a i t ) i i i i i e:: 7 l4, :t it ° l l l, Yrnul p l i ek °l ::::: r !DO' i ment of the late Parliament, which IA 4 ii ,i i that he saw an Him. Gentleman of ' coming with 'a caveat ag ainst it, bat l' e ,l* probai to that. will, " w n i t e d li illic'atilubleteillta‘t.t ; t 's l i i : g l e ie l . i n e l:a l i s v t bY Pl 3 4 B ia . ii P te e n rli t (i n n t ' ig r iit n h c e l ! Ititirttuct ol 4ll4l But there was a great proportion of ¢" .r, Parliament, who had 4001810;, J of the old, and whom 'llc would cto ll[ cl i quantity of grain thrown into _ 4 I I 01)4 ,re l 0 1. ti' W(ill Id bCOOIII the more pure from the t el% had Undergone. Fie hoped that these ( , ` , ( IA would consider themselves bound to l'ill'.o* r he Catholics, both by land and se a, ' , i e loit r ding their blood fur their Prtilestaut fc .• '''', t 01 ,° i . I t jests. The troth was, th;re svere nO ,'o -§ •to ~,- . diers in the ‘Vhole world, nor d id he t°91,1,!t because he W;tS an Irishman himself. t ,;' , , ,,'', testants and Catholics were swiP lf° l, l k l. ; same Boat together, arid they ought to „A fi 11 the Irish had any errors at ail, i ilv2 „ o ' l -.1},,,. V ieir own country; out tif it, there y. 34..,, i set of fellows in the world. - Upon e'' '' ';! , ' ' ,' ha felt hirnself obliged to sup Fort th'“ -(1! - . IVIr. Roty.vo opposed the motion. i 1 ;' On the motion of Sir do.ts .Nit'i r ' ''' ' i i bate - was then adjourned until Illoll',,", ~ 4 adjourned at two o'clock th: ,, ~-. • . if E I'EUR 0L 0 Grczer, .100.:'''' . BY. r.. BANKS, '• it :,.. mittosoPlitc.u. INsTRUMENT MO l E- '' 1 i,.0g.:. ........ ~.........._..... .. ~ , TilermoMin• . r. .....,. . •-- ~ 6 '''. . - • I " ; 2 ,0 -, .,,, ;.. ; .Q *C p.: ...4-, - bd . ,ii -, , ~'' 4,4-)- '' •-•.. .., ~,,, 1.. NI CI 20 - 44 45. 64) - 4 , 1 i 9 CC I , Pd. ~ 2k 45 ,r.,., 54 . 4p .36 ' 0 oor , .''' „ ~ , 1. = • 50 4N. I 54, 43 .76 ' ''' .. gaol •., , . 42. 47, f., - :30 lt. t., 46 46. .4 5 ' 23 .07 I) ''' l i 30.0 0 ~ • . ! i 7 ' i I __,-----7-------- ,! t ,•!s!' ' natTilS• . . ,r , :i•r' • ~, , ,,,,c, . . - ~ k kt . Waymouth i •on •Tbanday, 1 ! 4 erick Beition, Canon of Welts, ' • Part',ai bans to the Count. , pi SY ant -Co:o:iel 4tl the South Haut , : Tl•thliimattt, only (hkitg•llter t7l '• , ' ' 114-alt. )n 111- Init. at St.. Georxe'4 Chi itiarknne Francei't :••• ,r of ren'"' I°Q. ..• • t , •,•: '1 It )11 ;rtttotl ' r, I .• • , Esq. of L , , R- 4 )4oit Whitetrolue, Es(; doceaie d, ! • ; )n IV...dr:cid:re, at St. • fern cocks, ..t. , f;fti• ' n. R. Pple 51. p. : )11 Tivir , flity, , tl-. Ni arv . , , • ,•,, ' ''" Ei e4t tlangtitcr .!otitt , •tet. .t n 11,tcetnber last, id the. ) ;:i : a% )l '. 4' ,;r qtzet la! tl, of the Itoyai N". ti, Iskißl. • 171 We :kw A.ty tn,trnitig . , hi , ' rr John Si;nltio,k:,,,gl•ol, !te,4' wt his ri•turn to 1:4,14"ai fO7 1 , 8.1 1 ). I'JII/Nti of St. Johl tii tlijege'' '.it ult. at tie. bel..i...joarte‘rovv bt t'• linti4ll ..I.rmw l'ottioral, I ` on i 3n /* Avne, (tatildin to the Fort''' A ,. , ia Ireland, •to ' ps at Niarxet. 101.•••• Newcastle Cf):I,T ., NIA111(1 7 ,:r•F' 0 . 4 , Satstlerl.tml .. . ............... • .. t I , lk Stock, P 2 ll l 1 9 ( 1 ,; F: 94 1 :3 )P 41 S ;I: tICI( I SIldil k il O i .. 1‘1", old I ry .5 per Cent. 88,1 a lh 5 iter t 40' ent. (4, pr . -fi j tr• sr Cent. 740 . ' , Jan °mot 4 . er Cent.ltett. 59 591 69 echo ' er Cent. f 011" AO- to i Ilk L. Mu. i :1-I.ttaS I" Coo lia Stock, . Pi 00 , UGH wAT.Eit ,\'t' L os r.)0 1 v' ;4, i „g, risn)g, mimutes Hfter 12. 4 , rettor-vttotrt. be addressed.