The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1820-06-21 00:00:00

ed In rescind : the principle Nisi!, applied, woad =n ;n truth than In r. iil4er'the parties in the retailer 'jun in oi %iv% thy y e10p...1 immediattly before her 'arrival. slid tocCire the kin g .. Message was wet down lv hulls iloniges ill Parliament. After Niftier discn.ihan spun this point, it was agreed that the Duke of WeWeirton and laird Caostlereagli 'should result to the Cshinet what hail posed, and curse prepared with their ileteithiaatins le the west conference. Her Male.- ty'ss Islar Onicere theu asked, whether in the event of the above priirwitties not tweet adopted, sue tither prosodist coals' be issiggestel un the part of his Majesty's Goveraniest, which might render her Majesty's rthislence abroad consaistent with the aecognit• of her rights, anal the vindication of her thanactri ; and they specially pointed at the official intro- Anomie of her Majesty tes Foreign Courts by the King's Ministers almst. Vision this it was observed, that this pro pesiiiirt appeared open to she sante difficulty in roam of principle it was adhere opus the King le retract the deci sion fortuilly sakes sail avowed on the part of his Majesty,. alt risitas a 'reedy acidified to Ferrite Coolie, sod to resider the position of hia Majesty's repethentatives abroad, is retaliate or her Majesty. isenasistent with that of their Sovereign at home:—That the purpose fur which this was sostellet by the green's Advisers was inconsistent with the principle adansttel at the coasupencensent of the conference, and was one that could sot be reasoaably moiled to he tweaunplished ht the art of hit Majesty, namely, le give leer Majesty's toe sloct that sorntenanee which t h e states( the ease, as at pre. sells bel%re Isis 3fajeSty s altogelleer precluded. A , the yams v.e is was stated, that while his Majority, cisia‘issa. oily wills the steps already adopted, oasts' not autho rise the oolitic reeeptioat of the Qesee, or the istrodtictlnit of her Majesty at foreign Courts by .isie Ministers abroad, there wits nevertheless every diapositive to see that branch of the tar.h.rs already gives faithfully and liberally caccuted, which, enjoined the British Ministers as the Ceelifteet to flicubtate within their respective missions her Majesty's Sc. cuoneeedalina, sad to cootribule to her perorate& comfort and cuovetsituice. Ilrr Msjesifs Law Officers gave the Kist's &mots lie eIM.II wbalerer 40 think that Ow Queen could be induced 1, , 4, wort front the propositions above stated, unless wane •s. rmitided sus the saute principles, were acceded Se Ow tht past of his Majesty's Government. (Siguird) WELLINGTON. CASTLEREAGH. H. BROUGHAM. T. DENMAN. • • • Nu. If. Piotocol of the Sreostrl Conference, hold et the Foreign Office, Jaw 166, 1820. The King's Sere Ants begun the conferences by dating, that they Al , l not failed to eerie, with fidelity to the King a Go. v, 'omens, the proposition brought forward by her Majesty's I.on Univers, that the Queen's name should be expressly included is the liturgy. in order to protect her Majesty azniteo any disconstreetioo of the grounds us whits tinj,sly might conduit to reside abetted; itztt they Cr , tpd deceived, for reasons already sufficiently explained, in anti. ipatiog the sir prior of thee colkageses, nt the pro. doctont treoion for the 61.1 time WI the part of htr 1 1 ,, j• t.t v. more especially iu the pressed advanced state of 11., The they were Authorized distinctly to state. that the K ig',Servasts could on no account advise his M ajoity to re. • the derision already Pikret and acted sumo in this is. at zoce ; and that, tit prevent stiscoocept ion, the K lag's Gower.. 'went had charged the Doke of Welliagtow sad Lord Castle ,. IO explain, that they most equally decline to advise King to derirl frost the principle already laid down by I' • If ...jest, for the Airectiou of his representatives shroud, • th tegsrd to the public reception by the King's Ministers 5'0r..r.: , 1 sod introduction of her Majesty at foreign Courts, 1,1 that they were not only ready, hull &violets, to guard is • by renewed smilers agniiml any possible want of at. I...tiort to her Majesty's comfort ur convenience by his ✓ i•-•ty't Ministers abroad, tend that wherever her Majesty n ‘:l4 think St to eidahlials her residesoce, every endratrotar • ~.1•1 hr made to desire for bee Alajesty front that State the 1 • !1.,1 protection, and Ilse utmost remiss, contfort, attes t: ti, convenience. iinplanation of the position is which the King actually stood upon tin.; invidious iu hia foreign relations, the in iitrucli,ins limier which the Mioisters abroad wow seledowere (• , :itleiiiiicated tell* Queen's Law Oaten, and their ad.-olio* ~,a s .1:r-ticker well to the principles therein bud doorstostil front which his Majesty could not be exiled tiro. to depart, Ca to 1111,i branch of the instritelinns which wee studiously t•stned to provide for the personal comfort and coseveatieace of it...Moven when Princess of Wales. The Quern's Law Officers them stated that they mad sot mrbarstuod to sow at the giving of • genesis' power to 1.. r Illayisity to establish tot Cosset in soy foreign cossatty, ::.111 to be there received sod presented! by the I:siglish Mi rdrdss, because ressoons of stale might reveler it issexpe sedit that swim cordials circurnstsoces sorb aa establish inert striold be made; but they wished that her Majesty e•ort I li-re the poser of beings.. received sod treated by Minister, alsere no such mesons of state inter ; 11,1 they inquired whether the same objection wonlil •aiss public introdoction of her Majesty at some one s here she might As her residence, if she waived Ilse la introduction at Foreign Courts generally. To this it was answered, that the principle was in fart s' e some whether at osse or more Cowls, and that if the h..•E could be mossisteutly advised to meet the (Wren's • in this ismo would suce al ill, it wou he snore dignified fur 11..jemy to do so generally sad avowedly, than to adopt st:y psi toil or covert proceeding. The Queries Law Officers, referring to the decision of the Jokes in George • would be • scowls more smeteeptionable enercim of it a lloi:.1 pr. rogative, were the King eves to prescribe • re see Majesty should reside, but to order her there to bi- treated as (Altera by his Minister. The King's &mania, is consequence of what had parsed ei a former conference, dire reverted to the node in wh ir l s had *trivet in England, and the pais her Ma. ji..ir moot experience, were she eutsused to leave England in mr Ur inasorr. They acquainted her Majesty's Law (Mimes that Ihey c,.alti VlMillie to aseuce thew that this difficulty %soak! not I he Qneen arrived in England contrary in the King's ' , hr. , and repieureetations, but, wrre her Majtmy new in IJ-sire to pass w the Continent, whether to • port in the Lliseiorl, or if it should mure accord with her Majesty's rt. vs, to petard •t oiler to the Mediterraseas, • King's yacht is the one Oilstone', or a ship of war is. the other, might' be urrlrred to co owe, tor Majesly. After receiving these esplanativas, the Qneetes I.aw Officers recurred to the points before touched upon, viz. the insert ice the Queess'a name iu the Liturgy, or the devising some. bong in the slalom of au calisivalessf, and intimated their e hit her hlajesty soak! feel it necessary to prism ore or Wilt of those uhitetr, ur some other of a similar mafioso*: and tendency. The, them asked whether a resislenee one of the Roped Pastes would be secured to her Majesty, while in this t , nut. y. and observed that her Mrijusty had 'sever been de. poised sir her aparements is Keil-m.l:ton Palace, until she v•Atoutatily gave them up fur the ,reonsanodatioaa of the late Duke of Kent. It was replied that the King's Servants bad no instruc tions on this point. They however observed that they be. Hewed the spertments which her Majesty formerly occupied, when Princess of Wale,, erre at present actually in the pro- P.a.:ion of the I/lichees of Kral, sod that eery considered 1:141 ill.. point had brew already disposed of, by supplying to Majesty the food. which were necessity to furnish her 31ajiyie wails a suitatile residence. li. r Majesty's Lao Olken then imparted whether, Yuppie iiig lus stcaugrnseut nestle, the mode ofoiadiog op the hone scLiou, soil withdrawing the infirmities, referred to Pasha. mem had bees ceimintered, sett whether the Kin(/ Sertniata saw any objection is the present inotaoce tether Houses of Poliinnent repressing, by imitable Addresses both to the K is.g and Qweess. their grateful Shashi for their bbliesties hiclug acquiesced in au straugetocat by which Parbriairot " 1 bre u sowed the paialUl duty of ea dedicate sad alkali • pr °cr.-dirt. rdig Thc Kist's fterveatt aeltoteerkdiad this paint had bee letwa rowKid t re r vik hut reser, thellisebue tit report llye akar • " 6.41 * M lew _ fe frff B,ootetkuita. bee Ant ogriew e mas, epee every view of *ay awl pew • prietr, the final deri•inn should not be protracted beyond M ht, in which if", it stoned ho peur' ,l 6 ol that the liru reedtsig+ un ihr lime, MerlMgriu the House a COM- M Jlnr alloWl4l hr istkimortsrtl,n“ a 1111.1illel rxß l6 salios to III" ; sod eh•l a coed• reisee should lake isfisee its-lo 'Troy. is ...sire to twitte OW busiest ss Ina COnellition, sod to armor s by Met u4I cnterctit, the Prot cuts of conference. (Signna) WE.4,LINGrox. CASTLEREAGH. H. BROUGH AM. T. DENMAN. No. 111. Protocol or the Third Conference, hphl a t the F or eign °lke, Itowe 17, lete. The confeemwe wee-opened by her Majesty's Law Officers intimetiog. that, advertent to what hail passed 1.6 the ore raiser roaferenee. they had nothing to propose, but to pro ceed to the adjustment of the protocol. The Kisses Servants Stating. that, before they entered into (hie %ossifies• of arranging the Protocol, they thotetist it their duty to advert to the points discussed in the preceding coo. Greece, TIMM which un explicit opiniems had been expressed by them on the part of his Majesty's Government ; they then declared, that they were authorised in inform the Quern's Law Officers, that. in the event of her Majesty'. go ing to the Continent, a yacht or skip of war would he pro. vided for the conveyance of leer Majesty, either lit • port its the Channel or to a port intim Nledilerronean, a. her Ma jesty might prefer. That every pendent attention and respect would be paid by the King's greyest, abroad to her Majesty, and every en. &avow made by deem to protect bee Majesty atainrn any pimailek immovenience„ whether in het travels or residing net the Continent—with the understood reeerve, however, of poli tic reeeptioe by the King's MilliSlerlP abroad, and ietroduc hien at Foreign Courts. It was farther stated by the King'. Servants, that leaving weighed the steggerstiois communicated by the Queen's Law Officers in the preceding confereace, they were new pre. pared to declare, that they saw no difficulty (if the terms in which the same were to be conveyed were properly gniedeel) to a proposition being made to troth Holum, for expressing by address to the Quern nee well as to the King. their Crate ful acknowledgments for the facilities which their Msjestan might have respeetively afforded, towards the accomplish relent of an arrangement by which Parliament bad bees saved the itecemity of no painful a discussion. Theme observations not appearing to woke any material difference in the views taken by her Majesty's Law Officers of the result of the conferences. it was agreed to proceed in the arrangement of the Protocols. Before however the Protocol was flier-note& the King's Solemn' desired distinctly to know from her 'Mak My . * Law ftlficera, whether the introduction of the Quern's name in the Liturgy, and her Majesty's introduction at Foreign Courts, were either of them a condition rise gat/ won of an ar rangement on tier past of the Queen ; to which it was re plied, that either the introdnetion of tier Majesty's name in the Litiorgy, or an equivalent, *hick would have the effect of protecting her Majesty against the nnfartinrable infereoce to which her Majesty millet lie liable in 'ermine the conntry wieder the eircnnist sores in sibich her Majesty was placed, vl4 a river gall non The Qtiern could not he advised fierily to consent to any arratirement which was not amistac. tory to her Majetty's own f. sling% however her Maj. sty, with a view to meet the gapselerptend wishes of Pin liament. had kit it her clot) , to propose to leave the wk.& question to an arbitration. No proposition on the part of her Majesty, other than those already adverted to. wa‘ t.rought forward ('.i4.84/ .1) WELLINGTON. CASTLEREAGH. H. BROUGHAM. T. DENMAN. No. IV. Protocol of the Fourth C;tife;enee, belA at St. J3111(91.6 fepuire, ISth Stine, 1820. Before proceeding to Ankh the disenssioss of the Proto col*, it was suggested, on the part of the King's Servants, if possilele to meet the Queen's wishes, and in order the better to assure to her Majesty every suitable respect and attention within the particular state in which she 'night think R t to estaltli.h her residence (the Milanese or the Roman States having been pr. vionsly miggested by her Majesty's Law Officers, as the alternative within her Ma. jeitty, andemplatittn) that Ike King would eause official no. tification to be made of her Majesty', legal character as Qween,to the Government of suck Slate. That emsistently, however, with the reason. already stated, it 11111101 rein with the Sovereign of setch Slate, what reception should he given to her Majesty to that character. The King's Servants were particularly ermine:4 to impress upon the Gamete's Law Officers therddie ground upon which this principle rested. The general role of Foreign Courts is to receive only those who are received at tame. The trine could not with propriety require any point, of Foreign Governments, the re fnsal of which would not afford his Majesty just grounds of reseuiment or remonstrance. It would he neither for the King's dignity nor for the Queen's comfort, that she should be made the subject of Both a question. To this it was replied fur the Queen, that with respect to this new proposition on the part of the King's Servants, it should he taken into immediate consideration ; hnt her Ma jesty's law Officers 011eettell, that her Majesty Well not in the situation referred to in the above reasoning, having heen habitually received al Cowl in this country for many years, awl having mainly ceased to go their in !RH, nut of regarJ to the peculiarly, delicate .itumiom in which the nnforluuatc elifforesees in the Royal Family placed the late Queen. The latter ofiselvatmomm waa met, on the part of the Eiellee frmervanis, by * re•as•ertioa of hi• Majesty'. undoubted so. Homily 441 this point, whether as Kinm,te, or as Prince Regent 111 the esetrive of the Royal authority; that the Court held In her late Majesty was in Get the Coors of 'he Print... Regent. Ono acti or in the name amid ON the behalf of hi, late Ma jesty, and that the present Queen, Theo Primness of Wales, was eselsokd from such Court. <Signed) W MAIM:TON. CASTI.F.REAGH. H. IMOUGII A M. I'. DENA] AN. No. V. Protocol of the Fifth Conference, held rol the Foreign Office, Jane 19, 1920. The protoeo% of die preceding conferences were read and agreed upon. tier Majesty's Law Officers Mated, that the proposition of yesterday had kern sritiniiised to her Alsjesty. slid that it bad not produced any alteration in her *qrs.'''. sentiments. In order to avoid any misinterpretation of the expression used on mentionitic their belief that her Majesty might over. come her reluctance to go abroad, vii." under all the cir. rwtwst•eces of her position," they stated that they meant thereby, the nubs ppy domestic differences which crested the difficulty of her Majesty holding • Court, and the under. shied sense of Parliament, that her Majesty's residence in This country might be attended with public inconvenience. They also protested generally, in her Nlsjesty's name, against being understood to propose or to di sire any terms inconsistent with the honour and dignity of the King, or any which her own vindicative did not seem to sender absolutely necessary. MEMORANDUM. The second and third point.' as enninerated for discussion In the Protocol of the first (Indere:ice, were toot brunght into deliberation, in etniseinence of no satisfactory understand. Jag bruiser taken place upon the points batmen forward by bee Majesty's Law °ricers. The five protocols were then respectively signed. (Sped) WELI.IPti TON. CASTLFit PAWL H. TIRAINIHA M. T. DEN/lAN. Yesterday the remaiiip of the Lady of .losarm BUTlrluilvoaTH, 11.9. M.P. Were removed with greet iissersi treap frame her late residence in Pertnesominare, foi interment in the fiddly tank, at ttie POW tho Pet. City-road. ~ ~ LAW ti+iftLIGENCE: COURT OF CHANCERY, Lzscours 101, TUUDAT, Jou 10. The LORD CusacELLon came iato Court at ten o'clock. cotineaous v. LUG& The two %sots Colehrooke„ the infants into. rested Mu this suit, 'sited on the Lord Chancellor in his private room before be came into Court. His Lordship held a long conversation with them. They are beautiful and interesting looking young lathe% MISS KELLY'S BENEFIT AT THE LYCEUM THE YOUNG QUAKER. MORRIS AND OTHERS, PROPIIIIITORS OF THE HAY.. M ARISE? THEATER. O. MIN HILLY. AND NOILM• ESQ., raorairro IL OF THE LYCEUM THEATIW. Mr. HEALD, at the rising of the Court, moved for an injunction, ow the part of the Plaintiffs. to 'retrain the Defendorits from perfo►mtng the play of the Yorwir (tanker, for the benefit of Mies at the Lyceum Theatre, as it was one of those plays which had been assigned by Mr. O'Keefk to the Prop►ietors of the Haymarket Theatre; and if the Defendants were allowed to perform this play, it was alleged that the defendant Arnold intended to get op and perform other plays the production of Mr. O'Keeffe. Under those circumstance*, he had no doubt but his Lord ship would grant the injunction. The LORD CINIANCIII.LOII swished to be inform ed whether the amignment of the playa by Mr. (Mee& to the Haymarket theatre, was made in writing . ? . _ . Mr:l - IEALD answered in the affirmative. The LORD CHANCELLOS asked if the assigns meat was in Coon. and being informed it was net, he observed, that it was necessary that it should be certified to the Court by affidavit that the assign- Meld was made ut writing. as it had been held. and 'properly held, that a mere verbal assignment was not sufficient. The Solicitor for the Plaintiffs stated, that an affidavit to the purpose mentioned by his Lordship should he made. The LORO CHANCELLOR. Take the order for all iojuncti tttt t on your producing to the liegnitrar au affidavit that the essiginneut war in writing." Injuiiction granted. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WEITIIIIISTEMP, Tuns LT, June V. THE KING V. SIR F. BURDETT. Mr. Scattersrr resumed his argument at the point where he broke off on Saturday, when he was eitileavouritig to skew the little authority which the ewes cited by the Attorney-General ought now to possess; and lie argued that Lord Holt, and the whet. Judges of his time, had given opinions in some cases unfavourable to his view of the subject. from the remains of a prejudice which considered the King as the licenser mid comptroller of the pretty. The opinions of the Judges just after the Revolu tion, might not, for this reason, be regarded as of that authority which they otherwise would command. The Revolution did not at once endow men with correct opinions on constitutional points, any more than the Reformation did imtnediately give correct notions on theological points; they were both to he considered as only sanctioning the principle of free discteoiou. The Learned .Counsel here reviewed the cases of Lamb and Pickering, the latter de cided in the Stile Chamber, nu the authority of which Lord Holt had decided in the King against Beare, and contended there was nothing in either of them to support his Lord hip's application of them to that ca•e. He now proceeded to the modern authorities on the point of publication, and must conceive that the opinions of the Judges in the year 1789 were quite as good as that of Chief Justice Scruggs in Charles the Second's time. — At the lime of Mr. Fox's celebrated esinctinent re specting the law of libel, the Judges gave it as their deliberate opinion to the House of lords, that the crime consisted in publishing the libel, and that intention was no part of the definition of the crime at mon law. This was the recorded opinion of ten of the Judges, among whom was Lord Kenyon; and were we then to go back from that period to the era of Chief Justice Scruggs and Sir George Jefferies, and on their authority will the Attorney- Getter:if come and pray judgment on the writer of a libel—on the writer, as writer only, presuming his intention, and not proving the publication ? His Learned Friend had admitted, that in a civil case of libel, uo action could be maintained with. out publication. inasmuch as no damage could have been sustained, and yet it is affirmed that this wrong. for which au individual cannot have an ac tion, the King may prosecute for what in fact wet:only growing out oldie individual wrong. The caseofJohn de Northampton. he thought. was too loosely report ed to be much relied on; but in the Star Chamber case of Dr. Edwards, it was doubted whether send. iug a letter to an individual was a publication, and as such punishable there. Now, how absurd would that be, if writing /dour was an offence, ar the At tortiey-General had affirmed, and heetted it to forgery ? but it was sufficiently diptinguisitable from it. In the latter there must be au Molt to de fraud capable of proof, and to be proved by the Prosecutor. The act of forgery also was distinct and specific. If writing alone was ■n offence, where was there any work of literature which lashed the vices of the age, and which now formed part of our intellectual wealth, which :night not, according to that rule, have been the subject of a criminal prosecution? Every second line of Pope's Duacidul might have been prosecuted; nay, further. all history, if the h:stori■u possessed the primary qualification which lie ought to have—a Imre of truth—would be indictable. But what then, was all future history to deal only in pat.e. germ? IVas all future poetry to be written by the Poet Laureat ? Ile trusted that their Lordships would not be called upon thus to fetter Rettig's, while engaged in the great work of human improve. meut. The Learned Counsel weld minutely over the cases cited by the Attorney-General. to shew that where the wntiug and publication were in dif fervid places, the party might be prosecuted in either. The King a. techin was, he cootroded, against his Learned Friend; end for the kne,if the King 9: Nell, decided in 1748, be ahoirMiOleno taut to oppose the °pillion of the Jodie% wind► he harl before mentioned, in 17149; to niiich he would add the atttluirity of Chief 1i411)11 Cummin, who had defined a libel to be " a contumely or re. 'roach pahlisheri." Alluding to ths case of the King o. Reuse, he said, that it was important to distinguish that where a misdemeanor consisted of several misdemeanors, it might be laid where any of them wer e committed. With respect to the ay. gurnents from eases of conspiracy. be begged the Coon to recollect that conspiracy Arms as anossisloul Cringe. governed by peculiar principles, and so ad. witted by all lawyers in all lionea--. 'rise ann.'s from the wiirltntelo in the Hell here became quite uverpuwerfsig, sad Mr. &mien pawing.— Titer - Oar Jurrice infatilediiim-they bed sent to 'see if the Court of Exchequer had risen, in order to retleie him from the exertion he was obliged to use to he heard. Mr. ScanLETT said be had hoped it would have been effected lov a shorter process. The CHI EF Jurrtce—" There are great ditScul. ties in the case. Mr. Scsrlett." Mr. Sckat.trr resumed.--In Ai/ 'aim of chal. lenges, it had been held that the challenge being put in the pest, war a sufficient proof of publics tom, but there writing the challenge was the cri minal act, mid that was full sod complete, and publication added not a jot to the offence ; bat is libel, publication was of the essence of the offence s that is, if writing was not a crime per se, which he contended it was toot. Putting a letter in the Post-office was not, he coutended, a publication, and it was not only • warped and violent ititespre. wino. but a perversion of language so to call it. It might be evidence of a de:•igti to publish, but was no more evidence of puhlishiug thou getting into your carriage to go to dinner was evidence that you had dined. Mr. Jastice BAYLIT stiggiated a me which had occurred at the Uld Bailey in 1811, the King e. CsMu:hat', which hid not been printed, hut which mi c ht he considered in deciding on the pre *rot application ; in that case. which was referred to the twelve Jn ht es, there had been a difference of opinion on part or the cave. Mr. SCAZIATT said, possibly that apse sight be governed by the particular words of the Stamp Act, or some other Act of Parliament. In conclusion. he submitted that the case of the King v. Payne did not rest on such cases as were now considered of authority, but that it was overruled by the opi nion of the Judges in 1759. He submitted also, 'that the crime of libel consi.ted in publication, and that the word publication was to be understood ou its popular and vecuvtotited .rose; that there could be no coistinuation of the crime, because publica tion was. • stint& act ; and that in all cases of mis demeanor, except in conspiracy, the indictment must be in the place where the act was committed. He aubmitted also, that the place of publication was essential in cases of libel, and that iu this case there was no evidence to sheer that the publication took place in the . coanty of Leicester. The Learn ed Counsel, advertialy to the language of the infor mation, contended Mire was nothitig in the paper published by Sir Frant'is Burdett to chew that the acts on which he costhented had any relation to. or, in the words of the information. wera of and concerning the King's Government. On all there grounds. he contended that there ought to be a new trial. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE iutimatrd, the from the pressure of other Inosiusis, this matter most stand over till next Term. The ATZOILN EY -G EN A L pressed on the Court the nece►sity of dibili sing of this one in the pre sent Term, on the ground of its great public tin. portance, stick the expediency of avo►ding keeping up that irritation of the public amid which gene rally arose to such caber. The Loins Culler JUSTICE said, that their Lord ships would broil together to- 11111 l TOW, when it might he mentioned again. lie abio wore notice, that the Court would sit on the 223 , 1 October next, ■t SeT. P.11111.'1/410, and iu the interim his Lordship would himself Kit at n isi After some unimportant motions the Coon ad. journed. The following Gentlemen were yeuterday ratted to the degree of 13,irrister at Law. by the honour able Society of Lincoln's-Inn : George. W Ohms SalOderg, Eli. William Diekinr. Esq. Thomas Stead Carla, E.q. Joh.' James Pemberton, Leg. We are requested by Mr. RAYSIOND to state, that he sent Mr. SANS (the defendant in a ease of assault upon Mr. RAYMOND'S sister, as stated in our Paper of Thursday last) a mild and gentle manly tortrimsittott to settle the affair privately and amicably, and act an abject apology. to be tab. scribed by Me defendant (us asserted in our Paper of Saturday). A very melancholy accident happened in the Little Cumbray on Monday se'maight. Some boys went out with a gun to shoot at birds ; in the co►►rae of their amusement they sat down on the side of a hill, laying the gust alongside. Frog this posture, however, it ►lipped, and one of the Goys caught it by the u►uss-1 to pull it tip, whets tinfor innately the shut went off, grazed and est the sleeve of his coat, and, passing over his shoulder, entered near the eye of another boy sitting behind hint, and lodging in his bruin, killed him instantly. %%gist renders this occurrence more melancholy is, that the boy was the only dot. of Mr. ADAM, Calton, Glas gow, and had gone there to iiints.e himself for a few necks, during the vacation time of the Grammar School. COURSE OP EXCHANGE. TelliaMlß 11. Anuiti Mum, C.F. 12 4 Geom. . Ditto at Sight... 12 1 Venice Ital. V6O Rotterdam...". 12 S Halts .... . . 45 Antwerp .... 12 7 Naples.. :••• 301/ Hamburg\ ...... 37 1 Palrmo, per 114 Altona ..... 37 2 Lisbon ..... SO Paris 3 day's dote 25 70 Oporto .. 8 6 1 Ditto Ruardeaux ditto.. 28 r Rabic BO Frankfort ou the Dublin... • 111alue 155 Cork .. 9 Vienua Ea.tot.flo. 10 11 nut.uon. Trieete ......... l• II Pectoral Gold I • E a. It. Alladaid Codes ..... ,. ,- 41•14 in 8an.....• 3 IT 13f Ifilboa 34 New Doubloons... 3 14 0 Daroeloss • mlifi. N,few DoDers.••... I II 1 Orville ..•••••••• .4: liar is 11 , 4!•• • •• •I' Gibraltar.. •I. • a N. Loth. 6.14.... • . • 0 Leghorn •. • e«.•• 47 FROM LAsr IVICHrS GAZETIT. (Won Otter, .hit, 111, IMO. ■RIIRZR/ itirruans. TIP •tars 1W Ton r REI IC NT 1P5111.181111114 Ildwimigh of dialte4-4elta Fleevaiech fileecester.plare, Is the cosset, ef Req. le the room of Michael Getter Feeedergeet, Seq. Who bele, edema • Ilergrea fee the seed borough, sad else a Bergen for the testa sod essay of the tame of Gahm, hall" used" his clectiea to sem foie the 1544 teen mod comely of *Sloss of Golsay. if Oishissaptou-Alie Hoe. Jolts Comort.ii, soit v ai: h ryealled Lord Glesoraiy, of Tapsostli • She sagely of Perth, Is h«th Britain, is she Albeay week, Neg. *be Mae accepted the Chalices How deeds. BANK RU !WI MI ENLARGED. Wi11,.. Trodgett, of Berry IS. Edatmads,/iiiffuilt, m from July 11, to Jot; 20, at tem, at (he Angel Iwo, is 4ry IS. Eilmaads. Lake &male, of Weybride, Seam, baker, (nom hilt .4 , to Anted 12, at tea, at Gaildhall, lasidoo. BANERtYrrs. James Martin, of Umrpoot, onerektmet, is aorre , July 2,3, sod Angast I, at mie, at the Georg.- ;;, Street, Liverpool. Attorneys, Mr. Radcliff, ~„1 Meson. Adliagtoe and Gregory, imidard-row Leade q. JOINI Illiddleburst, of Bleckbure, Lootesier, grocer, t.. .reader, July 11, at Ave, lit, at einem sod Anga.t I, at twelve, at the Legs of Mao Iwo, likeekbens, Attorney., Mr. Henry Blakelork, Serastasses.l.4, Street, Loudon • and Mr. Robert Dewburst, Blank, a ru . James Heosll, of NevressOmopos•Tyise, Itoro-draper, le senates, Jose 24, July IS, sad August 1, at times, the George lon NeweaollempamTpme. Attorneys, Bed and Brodriek, Boor Ctiorelt.yaril, London ; anti m r . Abraham Dawson, Resesaary-lace, Newcastle.opou-Tyoe. John Jackson, of Liverpool, sailmsaker, to eurreuder, July V 7, IS, used Arrest 1, at osse, at she George lou, street, Liverpool. Attorneys, Messrs. tiered sod Exchasige-alley, Liverpool ; sad Messes. Low. and Bowes, Southamptoo-buildings, Chaneery..lasor, Loudest. Thomas Giles., of Nottingham, 15M..., to survvinler, July 4,5, and August I, at skyey, al the Pandit Oust, Peek•latie Nottioglnas. Attorneys, Messrs. Lo ig Ind Amtesi, Lostikea; and Mr. Percy, Nuitiuehun. Thomas Batt, of Soothamplea, shoemaker, Is saree...lrt. Joly 4, at three, 5, at elvers, and August I, at tine, at the Coach sod Horses lua, Southemptoo. dttorans, M. or.. Stale awl Jones, Joke -street, Bedford-ruw, Landon ; Mr. Bryant, Southampton. Jobs Casten, of Water-street, Middles..s, etrprorr, sorrendor, July I, 4, aod August I, at ten, at Go•lins/I, Loudon. Attorney, Mr. Plait, New Subirell.rourt, cola's litmlieles. Thossaa Davis. juin. formerly of With...magi., hest late of Little Baddow, Ems:, pig-dealer, to surrrsaeltr, June 24, July 1, and Auguyt 1, at tea, at Gaildhsil, Land,,,,„ tornsys, Messrs. Riehardsoo mid Miller, New luo, Id , sodon. Jobs Mickinsou, of Chareh•passage, near G 1111,111114 Loodon, warelsumensao, In surrcuder, June 24, Jo 4 I. stid August 1, at ten, at GlHdball. Attorney, Mr. LA.., Calm' eiswtreet. Milian, Anat.!, of C,anthridge, upholsterer, to terrendrr, Jesse 24, July 4, mad Aleppo I, at ooP, at Gaildb•ll. I.uu. dun. Attorowey. Mr. Smith, Alderananbury-pusteru, I. ruduu, Ralph John Aosta*, late of Thrugntartun-pireet, Lon,ht, and tale of Rotheshithe, Serrey, tnerchaat, tu surrroadro, Jesse 27, July 11, aad Audeat I, at tees, at Gash At te:Nays, Messrs. Ceppage and Cousins, Old Bruad..4ert. DIVIDENDS. 'use 24. J. Wilkins's, of A ppledure, Keil, miller, at twelve, at Guildhall, London. July 29. C. A. 'Wheelwright. of Cullom-street, bololoo, merchant, at twelve, at Guildhall. July??. J. White, formerly of Ftsch•lawe, and late 01.1 . . Broad-street, Loudon, but row of Windsor-terrace, City. road, Middlesex, merchant, at tea, at Guildhall, 1.41t1,10f1. July 21. R. Ahram, of Liverpool, merchant, as rt. rec., at the Star and Garter Tavel's, Paradise-street, Live r p ou t. July 38. J. Stevens, late of Che Urethane, Gloucester, vie. Inane?, at eleven, at the Royal Hotel, Cheltenham. July 14. C. Cawthorn, late of March, Isle of Ely, Canihridze, chemist, at clown, at the GritSu Inn, March. July 11. M. Noble, of Laurance, chemist, at two, at the Cross Keys lan, Lancaster. July 211.6. %Verdi& sod F. Wordale, Isle a Allhalluus wharf, Upper Thames-street, Undue', ull-cruiliers at twelve, at Guildhall. July 17. H. J. Hunt, late of Esping, Suffolk, miller, st twelve, at the White Hart lien, Newmarket. Jody elk L. Steplanewm, of Beverley, York, grocer, et thee., at the Tiger Ins, Beverley. August 19. P. sod H. Le Meaterier and Co. of Austix•friars, Landon, merchants, at twelve, at Guildhall. July 11. R. Peacock, late of Charing, Kent, miller, at ele ven, at Guildhall, Loudon. July 29. E Dampier, of Prionrove-street, Rishopszate-With. out, London, aeeffcrusher, at twelve, as Gs1;1.1;111 July 25. D. Phillip, of Fencburch-street, London, atatonwe, at ten, at Guildhall. July 22. J. Holland', of Romney-terrace. Hnrselerty-ru.•!. Westminster, builder, at eleven, at Guildhall, July IS. S. W. Wirohick, late of Staffued, druggi•t„ eleven, at the Seas Inn, Stafford. July 22. W. Bamford, of Houndstliicli,Nu, timber snerchant, at twelve, at Guildhall. L.milou July IS. J Coulthred, late of High Melton, mow y scrivener, at eleven, at the King's He.l lon, I:4rlmirp. CERTIFICATES.—Jutv E. Tory, late of Christchurch, Soo tit...nylon, grocer —W. Birmingham, of Manchester, mtatt.t.tcherr.-1 Wooti, of the Yew Tree, Suldlrwursh, York, collo* spiont r —B. Fayle, late of Dyer's-cutirt, Altlerinsuoory, London, fatter. —S. Minot, of Philpol-lane Loudon, oterckaus.—L. lb. Edwards, of she Memories, I.oatlon, meter-mariner.—T. Norris, late of Ramsgate, Kent, Ivor. r.— Cluark, ttf Braman, Leeds, clelhmetoefachwer. NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. P•RTSMOUTII, .11:417. Id. Arrived the Assiut, Black, floss Zanir, II w eke ; vise evoke um the 2SM May, is let, 37. .23. twig 11. an. she William, of soil from Luudua for Bahia; the oce lo t. Black, front Gibraltar; Harlegnia, trout tn: ; and Auu, Dray, from Pallas, oat 71 days: she spoke on die nth Ilsy, the lieutiett, from Messina, and uu the 13111 Mt!, the Thrle Frieuda, from Bristol. The following so . ' ,p o k es with is the Clusultel : Doris % (ono Baltosioir fur R:dov. dam; 111arasius, (ruin New (hl. um fur I...whma ; Sp. rifir, tom Cadiz fire Loudon; and SLausuri, frosts Loudon fur Tobago. Sailed the Pa!ladiern, Pal lisou, fur St. Pelersharck sad the Grecian or a cruise. DTA!, JUN% 19. Arrived last night and sailed fur the River the GeinTal Kyd, Nairue; and Windsur, frarhliu , flout Iladra. arid China. Arrived 10-day sod satird tir the River, the Rridgewatii, Trisiurs, from China q tar Rarrusss was to DIVIDENDS At OUILDUALL Tu-.V'RRuit' J Yaleo, late of Wartiford.ceart, merchant I J. Grist, Gokaass.-strect, merdiest l.l mica tUr 3 per Ct. 8ed...G0/ki l l 31 per Cems...• • 7t► 4 per Cents 86 per Ct. N. A. *crop. I pr. Bk. L. Ann. 171 13-16 Lodi. 80nd5.... 10 pr. 41 YESTERDAY. OW Rossi,'two. yid Ex. Bolls, 4...3 1 J dm. Dittu Commirocial Y pr. Lott. Tickets..29l. 10s. °alumna ... /it pr. Cons. fur Ac. 69fili 70 HIGH WATER THIS DAY AT LONDON BRIDGE. 11161, f. I &win SS atter IL MOW sad P4llmbed at Two Ihmins Peal sea Tim Owes Oaqty Ns. nr, stria, b C. a do ellead.