The Sun. — London, England, 1813-02-12 00:00:00

, . treating any new finite. :Thit with - out sacrificing r.ny part of their independence; it would be right to look at the weighty reeonsmendations with. wb;ch tlikliilLeame thernfrom the other House It was firanded on a.most elaborate investigation, entl had the conetirrenee,of not only all the high legal:authorities who sat in that •House, but also of the'liigh leading politicld eitarlicters of every description. 'All parties agreed in . the principle, and in theActail,- and therefore it camoto them s:;netioned by all the weight 'and consideration due :to the other House. It had beet' . suggelted, tt o t the Lords, by some new distribution of their (hales, might get over the arrear causes now . before them, and prevent the recurrence of sintilar arrears its futur.!, To do this, it was thought they might sit.after the Session for political business was closed, androutinue for a tittle to discharge their judicial. funetiOns. But in resorting to this, in order to preVent•the innovation of creating a new oftioer, they would be guilty of a still great er innovation upon the Constjtution. It could not he done without trenching opon the prerogative of the Crown, in the important privilege of pro roguing Parliament. It must put the Crown into the delicate and tilvhward satiation of either per mitting,Parliament to sit after. the national husi tress for which it hadheen assembled was finished, or of doing injustice to the •claimants tit their bar. Neither ought they to expect from the House of Lords, that they wonid depart fro:n their usual habits of sitting. But even were this acceded to, it tv,ould lie' only' exchanging one evil. for another, unit traniferring the arrears of the House of Lords to the Court of Chancery, by occupying the tune. of the Lord Chancellor in the former, which, during the reees's, he non , ' occupied in, the latter. With respect ro ale project for withdrawing the Lord Chancellor from presiding in the appellant juristhetton, it was not necessary to go into de tail. The first statesmen who had turned their attention to this point, had unanimously agreed in opinion, that such an alteration would derogate from the dignity of the House. It. was also evi dent that no other individual could he found to discharge this laborious duty. Igo doubt there Were several eininen j Peers capable of 'performing hut it was too much.. to think of building a permanent numittre upon the existence or convent ency of Peers, not of accessity bound so to devote themselves to the public service. The question was, (there being a necessity to provide.some aid in . the Court of Chancery) if it could be drawn 1:oin the other Courts. of Laiv, or if they must: be erec~ ti new ofiker. {ln the Court of -Chancery iv , ,elfebere . was a great, if not:a growing arrear, 4"great rillainity for which - there eppeared no re “by ineri.s.tsing a correspondent evil N,-mue of the other Courts were in a, wi rtr airodr . d help, but were all• so pressed • 411-I, , in‘.i,is that the., udges, with all tire diligence. t ~. d, could not cope with the, excess and dis :.tr their duties fulls% The Court of Chanetry ,could only fitly tir:lw aid from a Court, the (144.1 , ii0nS of mhiCii re4text pa'sitular principles of 11 the Court of 'Exchequer could nut 1;oplq the want, no other Court in Westminster- Itt.ll , could, l'mt.front the Cotirt of, ; l'2,S.cheipier no • a ss could spared. On.the Contrariy, the ar-,, reat Of bminelo was here more pressing than Oren in the, Court of C fir)hancery.,. ,'ouch ;19y illaCafi 1016001)0 .!1“ : 44C tlFai wonted to get throtigh t; itla ifild itc elf called. more for a remedy than of fered resource.. It 'was thought ,inspossible, th cre f u rii, that the remedy could. be expected from tny of the Courts its Westminster-Hall, Was "f:2ly generally supposed, quit the, measure noiv e F o I O,-,.ed .woald be the means of eausing innOva ous in time modit condocting lisinessin the (: , )n tof Citatfceo.' Nothing' could he more i:Jeut e.oh the principles oh which Ale Bill • founded t suppoiitiou .• The ob ject of the Bill was to afford to the. Lord 'Cint o ceitor a permanent, instead of. ti teulPorarY' assist— ance in the tr;thstteti;m of the business of the . Court of Chancery. The athoding assistance it. the trateraction, of holiness certainly did not any inn - ovation in -the mode of transacting it ; widths. :very reverse of innovation was the oblect Of the measure ,then uoderdiscuision. The func tions of the officer whom it was proposed to appiot were not different !eosin those whirls wereappomted Commissioners. If the Master of the Ilona was able, natwithstanding t 11V pressure of his. business, t Lord !he 11:1-llor,the assistance which he aq ., :lrdelt was not dii . :!.rent from that' given by .eoironissiini, The obi, ('drill which was minute, by eOtnparing time evil time Bill Would 'preduce sVith that which it would rernedy,instead of really Operating agaitist the Bill, .was a powerful argil - inept in its favour. For after a fair comparative view of the tut O oils, the magnitude of that which it l'emcdied,‘vas strikingly contrasted with the dimi nutive nature, of the evil which it would produce, • that there was little room for hesitating , to 'de cide in favoer , of the . Bill.. He had formerly' men that tiut present measure , %smold not cause additional -expense to die public, though it he ,prOductive of So great .henefit to the Chmicery. Otte half of the eXpense of 7 400 - 0 Wotil4 be charged on ptntits of the .14Ord' on the • business , : of the • Court the whet. half was td he taken from 'what`was called ,the de i 1 Cash, or Suicors 'and, the annual re entic of which, at that 'trine was 9,0001. The , ,Te.t.enue of that Fund coulal not certainly be : A pplied to arty better purpose th;tu the 'support or that ()11 - leer whose . appointraent was in conternplation— Thtli, at far as related to ecu twitty, the could be Ito objection to the 13i11.-- ' It had lieen said, that there were other weans 'by , which the object of : the 1341 could be PlOre effectually .ti . .t.,tiued, than by the, adoption of the measure which it proposed. And olte of those WaS• To t'lle aWaY the. A;anal ellletit the .V•ankruptcy busittens the - . Lord Chilli . ilrithout intoconsideration the fun- . pi iiii.:;iplcs . „ that this business shotV h;' frOot the Lorti Chancellor, - and e.,en alio xiogthat.- it tibil.cltt with propriety be a...v . ayieoto hint, still it would be uceesary 1.0 lave a Vic,c-Citancellor. For us to the peal. color joi.;:ollct iou of the Ir.itnkruptey business, none rt•tiqbeil. greater attention on account of 48 diffi , 1 4 1 4 ur, intritary. IL 11118 0 partieuiltrly 4 1 1- , 4 11,)1Gint, hi a clo oolcreil couutry, that it would be highly dangerous to trust the decision, on uess of Stich weight, to any authority sullordinatt,:, to that of the Lord Chancellor. It had been said,. that in 'the distribution of the business in the Court of Chancery; the Lord Chancellor might al low the Vide-Chancellor to decide upon matters of such difficulty, that, no authority short of the Lord, Chancellor himserf,.. should -have been al lowed to make a decision. This arglintent was untenable, because it went upon the abuse, and not the use of the measure proposed. It the principle of arguing on suspicion Were car riedsto any, length, there was no, reason why Lord Eljenborough should not wit hdraw front the exe cution of the duties of his situation, and intrust the functions of his office to his assistants. Cer tainly Lord Elletiborough WS only bound to the performance of the duties . 6f his office, try tics similar to those which hound the Lord Chan cellor.. If • wo,uld, be wrong in the House 'to legislate on such Principles. 111 Ireland bu siness was so arranged '..that the Master of the Rolls afforded assistance to the Lord 'Chan- . calor, and this arrangement was made, in conse quence.of a_ Bill which he had brbught into that House. When he brought that Bill forward, oh= jeetiOns :had been made to it, similar to those started to the Bill then before the House. The object which .both the Bills had in view was simi lar, nanicly;to provide nu anxiliary instrument to the Lord , Chancellor. , Experienf - e proved that the object ,had been attained in the case of the former so 'that it was but rational to 'conclude, that the,object should be effectually accomplished by the Bill 'tlien under the consideration of the House. persoha had said, that the expefices of the office of Vice. Chancellor should he charged wholly upon the emoluments which ,the Lord Chancel lor derived from the business iu OIL% Court of Chancery. 'When the importance and dignity oft he office werikconsidered, and when the magnitude of the labour attendant on the execution' of the duties of it were Ally estimated, it, would he found 'to be bitt reasonable ,that the Lord Chancellor should, reap the 'fruits • of his honest labour, and should live with becoming splentlOar..L--IroWertaittly should have the means 101: providing for his family, for it Was to be itftnetithered, that there was much risk and mreertainit in the bite during which it ini , 4ht be his, fortnna'4o continue in office.' - There were many distfrigifished Noblenwn, who owed the origin of their Faith, and the wealth of their families, to the provision which their ancestors had been able to derive front' their dig- &fled laboUr While they had tilled the: office of Lord Chancellor It seemed to be reasonable that this office should ba'endowed more liberally than' any other ; and that its income should not upon with jealousy. Under these cir cumstances he hoped that the House would not think of making any. encroachments •itpisn the re, 'venues derived by the Lord Chancellor from his office. His Lordship concluded, by moving- the Order of the Day-for the second reatiing 'of the -* • • Mr:BA' tilt as thought that the evil which Called forthe remedy, which was professed to be found . in' under the consideration of the house, d: was on of very great magnitue, but that the Bill dill by no means 'tend to ree l ove it.' The de toys -Which tack place in the execatioii of business in the Upper house, were prodigious and, Most vexations. , The Hotise might recollect 1104 long alniserableintin (IVIr. Hastings) had been kept in • a:State Of the most terrible,snspense by the delay in the proceedingis'against him while the prosecti tion •hting over him. Ile (fi.:13.) thought that 'the case Was not 'so desperate as many 'persons seemed:to supposeit.- As to having a Speaker in the Ifouse - of.Lords, althimgly he considered it as a -measure which ought certainly to be deprecated, yet in a certain degree, it might be henefiCiiil, as by creating a temporary Speaker, the Lord Chan ceLlor would be very much relieved, nod of course able to bestow a greater portion of his time, on the more important branches of his duty Ile .concluded by moving' .‘" l'hat the Isi,ll should be read a second time nit that darsiii weeks." Mt. JAmxs MwrioNALO said, that he should not make any comparison of the number of the de crees during the time of the existing Lord Cjian- Cellar,' and at any former period ; but he, woubl go into a comparison of the remedies which had been . propo,sed. The measure before the' House was not one ,which shelved any profoundness, • or-any depth of understanding in its contrivance. Any tradesman Who should complain to his next door neighbour of the magnitude of his badness, .and. of his inability •to manage it all, the answer of course would be---get 'a jour iteruan.-11the mace of the great seal were dismissed from the Court of Chamiery, would any • man say that it was not datigeroni? But woidd it obtain the object in view?. Was' there to be an ultimate appeal to the Lord Chancellor, or was there not? If there Was, what would become of the Measura before the House? Could it be.sup posed that suitors-in the Court of Chancerywouhl be contented with any thing' short of the decision , of-the Lord Chancollor himself. Mr. STENTENI said, that from the eposideration of the facts contained in the reports, and.which 'other Gentleman hard not perhaps brought into a proper focus for their observation, it appeared to him important to draw the attention of the House to the maguittide of theevil 'which it wits the ob ject of the present 'Bill to remedy. It appeared ,from the return, that the appeals 'entered in the "louse of. Lords amounted to not less than 305, and that an increase of 204 had taken place within 10 years, If the business Were allowed to go on in -this Manner, it wotild have this effect, that op.' peals Would never be hroaglit upon fair and rea sonable grounds, but that any party, who- were - desirous of , delay could adopt no bettertheans f at . . 'that object, than by baring recourse to an appeal. It was impossible to state a case which - called more loudly for it remedy. The ev it was allowed to exist ; 'rind yet the rettiedy proposed for it was opposed, all no other offered as a illstitute,- With reipect to'a remedy - alluded to, at •separat ingti'ie'ditties of 'the Chatieellor, - the ineonveni mice o f b oth ai tnettstire, he thought, was very obvithis; and' the separation of batikrupt Jurisdie ! don WaS the very lasi that should be attemptett Ike regretted that the taw establishments in the country were insufficient for the mass of busi ness, and that the time of J udges were too much occupied in their duties. A's matters stood at present, there was reason to apprehend,. that cages would be hastily decided, and haste was ge nerally, .or at least often, the parent of mistake. It Iras trot asserted by any person that there was not a great increase of business in the Court of Chancery. The commercial business depending in that ,Court did .not• amount- to less than 25,000,0001. therefore he hoped the House would see the necessity of oppointing an assistant to dis charge a part of those hurthens. which had nearly doubled since the time of Lim! IlardWicke. Mr.' COURTNEY said he had very serious objec tions to the Bill. did not deny that the evil existed, and that a remedy should be applied ; but he thought it should be more effincioUs than that proposed by the Bill. He would now assume, whether justly or not, that : the : remedy proposed was two-fold . ; title for the evil said to exist in the. Court of Chancery, and the other for that said to exist in the House of Lords. lie did not see how this Bill would wend the de fect in the Lords. lie thought it introduced an innovation not merely in practice, but in princi ple. Ills great objection to Bill was, that it did not provide a sufficient remedy for the evil com plained of. Mr. SMITH said the bill was prematurely brought forward. Two acts bad been passed which must contribute to lessen the number of appeals from the Court of Session of Scotland. The operation of these acts could not be•vet known, and it was on this' Recount that he considered the bill premature. He could not look opt' the bill as tendiug to less than a dissolution of the first judicial officer of the country. It waS asserted; that •no mischief could arise from thos withdrawing t part of • his duties from the Chancellor. It would at •least lessen: his intercourse With the politic; and that daily and - hourly intercourse- was, in his. opinion, One of the most effectual means for preserving him in the discharge, of those duties. Mr. Serjeant BEST thought there was no mea sure more likely to product: the desired 'effect than that now before the House. 'it' was said truly , from the opposite side of the Muse, that the num ber of Appeals amounted nearly to `a denial of justice. One :Cri a attlemn (Mr. South) thought that a . permanent remedy was not'necesiary, be cause there was a prObability that the Scistch Ap peals Would, be considerably lessened,• but he did not consider the great number'' that was already depending from that country, ' and that those train Ireland v.-cre to be added, which 'amounted at peesent to 5'2. He saw no - likelihOod that appeals' would decrclise, because elways atig wentsti with the augmentation of prosperity. It %vas that this Bill 'would alter the character of the Chancellor ; and that he would 'become, itc consetpenee 'Of it', 'nOthin . g more than a Stat e 'Officer. They sho u ld not forget the'weights of legin tlntiel that would retrain opon hiM— that he would sit for the discharge:of businesS three days daring the Session et' Partiainent; and every day when Parliament was' not sittim!,.. if ' his bankruptcy jurisdiction were to be sssitharaw n ,- no•great innovation could . be . ititroduced; bank ruptcy proceeded from the great str.A, and to change it would be tointroduce a change in the original. jurisdiction. Another ' reason against such an innovation was, that its eases 'oF' bank ruptcy there ought to be no appeal, from the ne- . : eessity there existed of distributing as Speedily as possible the property of the bankrupt. li e thought nothing better could be at presant pro posed than the Bill before the Houae, he would therefore give it his support Air. M. A. T.istt.oa opposed the Bill. C ANN/N o r contended,' that with all 'due re , spect to the -House of Lords, that House would not be justified acopt.ng a measure merely, be• 1 • cause it CROW down to them from the other. It was . ngainst •argunient and 'common sense to as sume, that because the eviroriginateil 'with the 1 , 44', they (the Commons) ought to haye'the loose -confidence in the remedy they proposed. His Hon, nod Learned Friend had complained that the subject had been treated with 'tab much levity, but he (Mr. C.) Maintained that' there were eitcumitances which might make ridicule: not in compatible with serious • and sober discussion. There were two ways at removing the evil com . plaioed of—one was to empty the reServow, time other to stop the chanhel : the one to.get rid of the causes- already on hand, the other to, prevent newones coining. This measure, he was of Opi nion, would increase the evil, its it %mild oblige: the'Lord Chancellor to try' the causes twice in stead of once. It Would be no degradation to the illinse of Lords if they were to resort to TheaSures similar to thOse form,erly adopted by the flotise of COmmoni, in order to insure' a sufficient attend ante to facilitate the• dispatch of business. Such a determination would 'soon lessen the evil corn plained of and make any other remedy unnecessary. The present measure was perfectly inadeettate, 'and it Was ridienhAS to talk o•f ietuling it to a 'Connititteelo be made what it ought to be.ar-- To go into a Committee Ms it would be to throw :Lw:ty their labour and their - time, and lie'there fore thought the HOuse ought to stop; till. they could supply a more - fiatklantory remedy. He could assure his Honourable and Learned 'Friend under the Gallery (Mr; Stephen), that he had no wish to provokelevity ; but the thuse could not but laugh to see the mountain bad produced such. a Mouse. The unwillingness of the Learned-Gen tleman (Mr. Stephen) to countenance anything like levity on this 'occasion, breniglit to 'his recol lection the language' of itfaster Stephen, in -Everg, • Mon in his Humour, who v as of opinion that every thing . . u4al4 a41 .1 0 3; u 1 r n d ttl O : et c h e a grav e ly li : l ). lg :st e t tt i te n ds a ottl gentle- :Is, :: should pi evail." length on the restrictions tinder- Which the new labour. r 4.Z( l 7u s b ad i ri t ht " 8, pl c ii i. y e , tt i e l ( f l ic ' rit n this 'l t 3 l! e ll ' ‘' f ' a { ; ( e lf e, and Saacho Puna, compared with him • were 4 .11 a 'si ts f definite isd et ion. Like Sancho, the Vice-Chancellor .would haVe thts'eaSeS prepared and laid before him, amid Isis j us li s S a l aut ith r i ty would afford iiatter of inerrimeut to alt mankind. He o{}jetted to this MCA:Aire in tote s on this yourid, :lot it went to creote 1 Mag:.' trii , te , rots' not fit* to be introdnced into Br,ti"' Ayes Noes Consols, ,t... _a,,._.... tosnos • Printed Ir k TltomAs NA'001); of 1 12 , Stnruig and by WILLIAM ARMRiLIi Moltni;t . Grolirt,nor-tplart, ~At t h e . iaN )rvice, No, 11.2, where ddvcrtirements, Orden f o r the A' oper, Leven tot 1 s!'• • 1- ' lAN'. Gust vatiti, must be atifil - CSie • rudence. Mr. SlntrlrEN explained. Sir S. liomILL Y said, there was an evil° icdied of very serious nature. The roposed was also of a very serious net ;wild, in his opinion, prove a g teater tL fiat at present. complained of. The prese:i l t ! oweyer great, was of a temporary natiu! 1111' before the House would, if carriek aem one which would lie permanent. le, Lords, though the arrears had long , ig upon them, had never taken any arcs for removing the evil. They had t Unusal hours for the purpose of 3 get through with them, an d they. ear& an appeal in the absence of the 140 1 pilot% This it had been the practice (All ) do in foriAer times, and' in sowe eases c better that the cause should be (t. bsence, as appeals from his decisioas tine before them. He thought there ()difficulty in procuring the attendance lent number of Lords to hear catises,,it !nee of the Lord-Chancellor, and,b)' lone the evil might gradually be rc id not think any other remedy W as ad at least he thought what he had. light to be tried, before 3 measure li)ti roposed were adopted. In conclusi, as his opinion,, that a greater of be done to the Court of Chancery: e done by this Bill, if it passed, as it rely alter the constitution of -the Coe Mr. WEVIERALL StrOligly 111 1 1 le3Stlre, If two years discussion a nd on of it were not sufficient, he, did 'bat would be reckoned • a reasonable squiring into its expediency, nor tv` ie tientlemen on the other side. D e 3 E the Court, he Maintained, , had iflehvfl, inch, that since the year 170 Ow eals had been - not doubled, but tr e ble ; roved,that the evil compl+tincd Of wits 11° . ' orary evil,'and,. therefore, it w , s. 0 11 illed•for the remedy now proposed. ad Learned .Gentleman spoke et c ' . , and defended the 14 with lauep on and success. The SOLICIT6R-GENERA I: (Sir api W. In G n ! admirable speech, gave hi aion r the Bill, and-against 'the Amendrnent:ce, :;ted on the necessity of providing ju st ' in s dijects of the Realm; n ow - exposed t° mveniences, by the delay in the COO ui concluded.an dpen and manly ell' cry part of the measure, by giving 1) , ?probation 'to the Bill, as soun d 1)1 . 11 ' edy foi a. great evil. Mr. Pinisni/ny, at some length! °Pl)_.` • Ale Tile house then divided upon tiO + l' - 4 l ' . 90 1 rni Majority. - e se'' a ?fl y, ft, 4ne original question tor th" d •oetkt. cNJl,wr.r.s thP.n carried without was committed for Monil 8 : 1 * Adjouri,ed Three o'Cloc'. • ••., „, tion,.l "L".O, 'rri Gues. 1 Jose:, c4WLit 4 PRICE in.' S()C18 • vr:s ...Vy• AT '4AV 411•Vr . C 1 4 1, .. .. .. . ........ .. •• • Til A ''".E't (41 , 1 i victim.; I,M.qtot ,kor,o X. 0 . .INT D• 0 N. - r „, i .I.anAy , FE,BRti Arty .12, ,„ e itc) New. York Papers to the 17th . t ot. :- his mornin. We do no t fiud 0)0 1 . 1 c , rthatloo of the relicirt o f 'th e teriioo° 'll leetion . for nor o f The 111; i.9o.ricaksi corps having' obt3lo.otl Ast The ~ tory - of the 1 3. view' rs havin: kirmeerlcatLelc'rig:iit hie t . e, a r p i p l e a a v r i s og t ti ras vaseton the 22d of Deteinlicr. Generatilm asTuoNG had been ,1 1'1' 4 ;,,0 f ary, ut War, and Captain Ar :LOA M . 1 ' adelphia, Secretary of the y • , The 13ill for raising au adflitioio' nen had pas , ;ed to a third reading teprcsentutives. . , • :10 Paris Papers reacted tow lest : 1 0 14 2 t 1t 4 :11 t t ' S ' . W i e ly il t a i l l ' e e 1 9 6 11- o l g Y ' ( l. l Q et L) t ill l iis i A t4 l tt:"4'll' )osed Regen cy it will be eeen tlje !coronation of the EinpreSS-iii,tatA 1.")'1 'vi! ittle King of Rona, is to htc ", 1 1 1 )edition, and sand:oiled, we 5uP1 166 ,; of the Port, for whic.4l porli`; - e ' )f the late reconciliation tictisceP EILTONAPAATU took - place. are The accounts from the . •endered • vague - , but it will iie .tussia_ns had advanced ne'rly iling of PRUSSIA hvd gOile' to i1r416, .11,) oily of the French Itinit;ter, 10 0 9 :ion at lierlia to exercise the IMP AI Our Port Letters received to-(10'# hint: isf itnpettance. - r be new Farc'e of )1 The ithsent .1' ri,tf,n2el so ninch ,oppot4tion WO Jane Theatre, that 013. Au thor th°" l withdraw it. rfhat. ;ouch of this 00;, 1 yutable to privlte re,entibnt etollaio e,!, ns many writer-; hnti th frill lie , eir fritt strrirtcd under the ..v it 41na ball°ur .datlres:..es, ietle r ` TI:':. "iartinis of Btfotrgat'g . tli IA ) 1115111 div , night, bt Stt.twe. ......s ( 60tha i$ s' 4t. tt , year o f ta Too' I°"s ;toe. H,,, eitfelt III), Earl Tealrs,v, ~, , N. AI keV I 1 • ~, . 4 , 71' ground, tl-.at it went to creote am. :; was not tit to be introdue3 into Bt:tiA11". prudence. . . Mr. SlntrlrEN explained. s- .1 tl,to Sir S. RomiLLY said, there was an et 4.f: medied of 'a very serious na ture. The r '' i , proposed was also of a very serious nato l , t 4 : would, in his opiti:on, prove a gteater to I t:, that at present complained of. The 1)1 11 ' 4 i however great, was of a temporary natiliA.: Bill - before the H o use would, if corrital,,brit -,,,,, them one which Would lie permanent. of Lords, thongli the arrears had -long het° -, ing upon them, had never taken any actl 4 sores for removing the evil. rfiley 10( 1 ° 1 ' 6 ' , at unusal hours for the purpose of encle.y j - , to get through with them, and they 11 0 , ~ heard an appeal in the absence of the 1 - 4 r i f o o,' cellar. This it had been the practic e oftbr i , t col l to do in foriner tittles, and in sowe easesitlii be - better that the cause should be ticci deu i 7 '4 l absence, as appeals from his decisions Ito ~Z! came' before them. Ile thought th ere , A no difficulty in procuring the attendance tittri in cient number of Lords to hear causes,io il 'Po V sense of the Lord - Chancellor, and hY °l t .ti alone the evil might gradually be reuicil i did not think any other remedy will !1° ,;;( . and at least he thought what he hall In d ' 0 1 ought to he tried, before at measure like ;pa, proposed were adopted. • In conch :'ll' 1 usia it as his opinion, that a greater niist,"' r , not be done to the Court of Chancel . i .i! ~0 be done , by this Bill, if it passed , as it ' , l '" 1. 4 tirely alter the constitution of - the Coal' ilk '..... Mr. WEVIERALL Wll3 Strollgly in 11 , 1 , 11. '„ uf :e.' measure.. If two years discussion and 7,4'1.° Lion of it were not sufficient, he di d /.-I•44ojuti what would be reckoned • a reasona ble !: ~,,, 4 inquiring into its expediency, nor , v'n lL, ,,, j .'.t . #l l ' , ' 4 , 1 the tientlemen on the other side. rye -i,"a'---, of the Court, he Maintained,• had iiic fe '",i J much, that since the year 1750 the nolu e : , i ,,,,. peals had been - not doubled, but treble', i .'" (1 , 1 1 proved,that the evil complained of was' not ;0 4. l l ' e lt ri ° . i ( r i gi B e t r (.. l3 l ll_ , . , , f e o: a r r v in t i i , l e i l: d e . : are .Gentlemanenf ti e ti l n e . d cl e t y d h e t t ) r t f i e ) f ‘'4 (jr p e r ' ol i)t u :ve ' is * . :lb% ; .IN' 1411 thin and success. • e b s i v spoke th e: iD eL l l i t s ~,. '.',. - • The SoL * tcyrtia-GENERAt (Sir IV. G a , r ,„ /1 “ , I in admire speech, gave his OPIII on " l ir' )f the Bill, and-against the Amendment.. e fit i , ;isted.on the necessity of providing i n stic tn el ''' ttilijects of the Realm; now - exposed t°„4-1 t'' :!onveniences, by the delay in the C" nr ,!ltisi ' ind concluded.an ("pen and ratmly eT': .: -.. every part of the measure, by giving ) ., ' ,titPt. • t 3 Approbation to" the Bill, as a sound p 174 - - •,,,,, ' I.)] tletly for a great evil. • • • oel : k 0 Mr. PONscii , ray, at so m e length, °Pi, • '1) Bill. -' - - - . , - 7, A i rt elills ' / ' The House then divided upon tits "-- 4 0 1 .• , 4 l • t l ie, was ß; l . I . , C_ 1:4111.Irtilsle . b ar s r: r t i s I ) i ll , t i li 1 e:_ii l'a , l:ji° ,2 -efrc69. l 3try t ir t !" -A. 1 31 : 1 : 11 / 1 1 -71 , -- . 1 1 , 4% .1 1 . ..: i * t, -'l' r. 1 1 2 .1. i k w r ti t it u tt 'i t ' v i l l Y : it :: :3 '' ''' I':: f ' , '' , ; °: ! ..1 Ayes The 0 ' • 1 -. • ~... the se t . :‘ ,11. i i,„ , , s Adjoumei a-. Three o'ClOci l * ' __,,......-.Y...te:- ° •! -l ' •• ......,,......„... •-........._,:-.&.7.,....0,...,.........r.T.--, ..---1 • , ~ bu f •h, :_.--- •,r-' i WO , , piticE OP S; -- % , f - ' ,, • 5 1 L. "" ''Y t•i• TwiliSr. ct .;lC . ~..., wri .Consuls.. . ..... ".. . '.:' .. '" .... . ......... •..• • . -,'" ''' VI -_____.....,.... ....,. ........._ ' - ..„__-.., t --••••-- -----' -:l4 ti 1 Gue'rnsev 1 3CS',.'';'l :t.l:ll(4l,lis.Eviciirtt; v7kt.1 1 :1. 1.),11 ' • ' .N: ~.....yarbyy, vu,l3ittimly .I`2„ 13 1 ...„, ~ X. 0 . 1%; .1)• ON. - . 1 , ', • ----..----- ----- --- ---- ' 1" 1' Y ork Pa ers to the p lith ult. r ''' 46l' ''' 1 / 4 ' l New t fi l i t uul is r t n i t o ir o n o lt f tg ;!he I r V e e o d l t . : o n f ot th fit e ul te i r i l i ni t i l `l ll '''' , ‘ ' ; ,i election for President, 'for of 11, ' 11:: ' '1 ' C '' ' knO.rican corps havi n g •t. ' - 1 P G ''' '' ,' 0..t0n-t ~,,. E ' 7l 4‘ t he lil s ' to ri r t 'l lii. o ' f the P oictpiers' lii-Lin.r..;r,'ii:: 'ls ; Ameilcan frigate, circumstance of' herhav' ' itird l'' , 4,- , ingrAP o t. 'i vessel-on thc.22d of Deeemlier. i ' l te''il 4 , [ •! • General' 4 101 STUO X ; had been ;il'l''',,, l ,i,' )4;'' tary ut War, and Ca *V - ' • jc. ' ' 1 appears to have Cilt' L ., :t e:: , " lilt , ptam 4I L 1.1.01 . r ladelphia, Secretary of the :lit -, y• , . ; , .# l4 ,J';'' • 'Vile Bill for raising an adtlitiol l '''''''.,:• P i.' men had passed to a third readitvz, io 1 " --)4 Itepresentatives. - • . • •. , 1 . • 4.... , Vl',2 -• , 1: , J• t e e '' contents.i 1 u 1 t ? :; t r i i t s . l . ) 14, 7 e e 7 1 a r l e ,e a i. ( .1 . 1 :1 1 . y d t r o o -. 1 v )1 1 bust jit s .., i t l .)' ' 1, ,,, i f:;i ii,74, 1 , ! By the lOng details rel- , !',' 'iol'tX4 . - posed Regency IL will b e ge en t. 4., . ,: ;° e ,,,,J.ri k tkl Coronation of the liMpress . TalAttiA "'',..ith , ',,.( 1 1 141 little King of Itona, is to lie got " e l' `tyr. .. 11 41 petlition, and sand:oiled, we snll n) ''.; tI. : 'ill SClce, of the Po"a, for which I/01 1 ' 1 1 ; c j of the late reconciliation betwecii . ''.. ‘BtrowafiaTa took - place. • ` , ire r The accounts from the Ara);e s . 0 • tti, .. • rendered • vague - , lint it will i) `,e'''' ‘ ),Y ( ' R4 l Russians had advanced nekt.ly to t ' e ,,, io .i . ,.!4t King of PausslA 11 , ... , 3 gone' to ilrt•W: l 0 .:', l ', to3y of the French Minister, 10.10.::• kilu at lierlitt to exercise the IMP ° 1 ., . '. coo ` 0 • - 'Lltsj Our Port Letters recs' ved to -,. ,i .. . .. . i ~ , 11 , thing of itnpot twice. , - ' -:, I P 0 —.....fti0 , ..r: - 1 -- p t , - ~ 1 1 The new Farce Of The elkent A Y, o tot ' i Li t !et '"lt - , - ' rieveed so much opposition 1 oti pl,-' . Ili lane Theatre, that ttic Author t i ~,6 4 1 4 ii 'la ‘ p ‘ t 'i it t a b l d tlT w to tr 'tb c ' 4 4 rt ,?,!,,as many writers toil their a at , tip, smarted under the wit ;n }ee l huty. o o', i '' 'l4 o n : 7 - „...ib t ,dui dr Isset. . a v lll,wrie ' ~ . „...„,,il.)Li i I i t p . i.i wrft!:.,:itlt..e!,tei t i l l c t l ip i eonf: Iti,iil:ll:,:e!,:lid,il 11 : ,t,,,: ,i,,,, : tt i: , The. Martinis of ptici-o - . fp r ~, ~.k to , 3 , LK( o .,t i le,si. , slay night, at t 0.,-,..e. 43- 1 . s ac( . # 1 , 1,1 6001 Year Of his aoe. I4e i s s ac t 1 , 4 {-1 4 ) .. ~,otv •-'• - - At v 41 14,,