The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1820-08-30 00:00:00

:- • ~~ r .~ • ^r".••••;*.• eoneome4 be woo ottaated by the purest imelims, hot it aeceesled to him why his Noble sod Lammed Friend had given his vole me be did roe the last question, hecames it would lead their Lordships inter dilkulties. If the Noble emel Loomed Lod was series. in tie tootles, of which he Foe satire us Someday, it ought to have lakes prey:e demas- of every other questioe; until be had heard some better rooter fk eihoorlefflid Moieties Mies he bill•hrird,be would takiret to it. He would ask his Noble mid Leaned Prised why belted allessed two sr three hears of debate to go ow this *my, without his prolamin . (lie . weetima which he heel gives meliee of? It was an old adage, I' get am inch, mid we will Wets lake • yard." lad Erato, said, the reason be did not claim the proem dame lot bile motiots, wee, that he onderstood from the Vol* Eat' (Liverpool) that Counsel agates* the dill would Welk exassinateas of witnesses they wasted. ' 'rho Earl of Liverpool (across the table) -0 I did wet pledge that the Hone would do so." toed Erskine certainly did not understand The Noble Earl as having done so, but what was proposed by hies wee tweet itiventageom to the accused; and was that a resume that he .Mold sot vote for that which was useful ? The motion he hail -before made fur a list of witnesses had been read; it mil*, therefore, be necessary fee him to stile what be • isitatirhy On rimmed resolution of that motion :it was, that IbeCtirte4l fur the Crown might have the opportunity of bnegin forward other wits/roses than Hiner in the list deli veries', the memeerel, with the approbation of the Hawse. the/16006g the adviee of the Jodree. He wished from his **art that that emotion had been carried, •• It would have prevailed the Evolution in their Lordship,' proetediep which bad taken place. Karl Broknirst—lt was tree that the Noble and Leare ed Lord had voted for the last queetiort, which he said was goosing • soinetbilig towards the administration of justice, sad then hrtook advantage of it, by making a 'notion Mimi. tar loth" owe had made before, sod negatived by their Lord- Mips: The objections them op the greeting the list of wit. “esses had not been removed, Modred of which it had become more objectionable on account of the last vote or their Lord stilmi, which mad* it unnecessary. He did not 'hank the :Noble and Learned Lord had any authority for his present mottos ; if their Lordships were to come to a dilf-rent vote from their former me, and the list of witnesses milted on the arrival of the widener' is this country, they 'weld be vilified in all the libelluwa vipers of the day. If a list of oilneese• was granted, moil a necessary witness, if not won t.orted is that list, would not he allowed lobe prorhiceil by the nuoset m, favour of she Bill, they would be prevented trop the beuefit of the evidence of the witness. Ii had been stated that when their amendort hail passed this Act, which had been so meet. commented on, from that lime it hail out been acted on testi l the trial of oed George Gordon. Their Lordship: mast remember the riots which took place pre. .uus to that trial, which he might say at least took place u...ter the name of Lord George Gordon. In a trill for high liesson after that time, where a list of witnesses was given, the lint and principal witness, resign his name having been staled in the list, it was well knowit that he was assassi. haled. On the late trials for high treason, it was well known that It was with much difficulty that the crime was primed; but after a list of witnesses had beeii given to the prisoner', • witness bad been found that would have proved the 'rearm al once; but Counsel Cm the prosecutium was debarred from reducing him, localise his name was 104 in the list a witnesses furnished to the accused. the only ground on which it ennid be contended that a list et witurwies should be given in cases of high treason was, th it 55w accessed weight inquire into the character of the wit messes ; bat it was only in that description of case it was grassed. If gestated MI the present OCC*BIOII, it would be come a precedent, sod could not be refused is any other ease; therefore it was nut necessary that a list of witnesses shimiel be furnished. The motion of the Noble and Learn. ts4LuittlwrUid;;;lmale the inquiry come to a more early close, for if there was the necessity to inquire into the cha racter of every witness, the same inquiry would be necessary as to the character of every witness that was Blot included in the Ito, sod might be brought to give evidence iu support of the 1611. Lord Holland said, that it had been his anxious wish not to have been obliged to have said one word on this sub ject. soil oolong "'old w,ve compelled him to have de. parted from that determination, hut the extraneous matter syntrh had beau introduced by the Noble Earls (Lauderdale act aailturst). He thought they ought to have considered bilker they argued against one of the best laws in the coon t. y, anti nut to have attempted to depreciate that glorious Act of Parliament which bad been acted tot for the last 40 yeses_ It was to that Act of Parliament that he (Lord fiollstid), and all his ilisjesty'e subjects, owed their 1, oet t y and the protection of their property. The e , ,:-.erving of that Act inviolate was of more come v.senee to the nation than the proceeding they were pain. tcii, called on to discuss. What did the Noble Earl (Fat:torsi) meat, by snyinz, because a moo accused of filo treason, and was not eituviettd, did he mean to say on seseunt of his acquittal the law was defective ? He had cosy.; understood that in cases of usury, whether it was r gi , t or wrong, it was not for him to say, that a list of wit. trial-11 was gives. He would media repeat, that that glut,. ci s Act which bad bees so mach cuniplatued of by the NAle Earls, hail, for the last 40 yeses, secured to his Ma jedy's subjects their liberty and their property, and this he s-id without the fear of contradiction. Much credit cer ts.uly .was due to the Noble Earl (Liverpool), Cum the man ner to which he bad introduced the subject to their Lord. si spa that morniug, when be said, that he saw greater t•suitirenience in withdrawing any promise which had been made, or disappointing any expectation which hail been reasonably formed, than in yielding an advantage. It had been said by spume Noble Lords, what signified promises, and rt st w3s held out, es we are obliged to act according to justice. He would tell them they were not a law iribusal, but that they were Lrgislatoes, acid as such they must act f.sm their own breasts. When be was told that this was an tididgence that the Judges in a Court of Law would not grunt, he is reply would tell them tint it was an initial grace that their Lordaltips could grant, and by doing so they would show the Royal accused that she should have every thing from their bands consistent with justice. lie would not say every thing be thought of his Noble amid Learned File.c4 (Lord Erskitie), because be was present; but when be cm hint in his old age with renovated vigour, instruct ing their Lordships, and skewing them the only way to put us (Cul to this disgusting busioess, it only confirmed him to the high opinion Le had of him as a statesman and a lawyer. East Ta r of Limerick was of opinion that the present no floe was onaecessary, as the Royal accused had gained as -equivalent by the last vote of their Lordships. Loyd Calthorpe said, he would support any motion that weti.d rescue the Home from going further into the inquiry. 'Floe Lord Cimacellor observed, that be was bound by the 11:•!Ci111011 their Lordships es to the former question ; sold ttiesr loorieg come to that decision, he wished it might not 10 , followed up by the evils which be lied foreseen. lie was staid it would lead to interminable didieulties, as it gave the accused inure advantages than um ever before kuuwu in the history of the country. He was of monitor they ought it. go through will the ease against her Majesty, and then show her as much delay fur her defence as she might think pmper,G.Thielleing hi. 'pintos, be could sot say " Con kat" to the motion of his Noble and Learned Friend. Laid &skim observed, that the intention of his motion WWI i 9 4wearai delay. Their Luedships then dirk!. Conteuts us-,Cou ten la MajoriSy-apinst Lord Erskine's a mioe.. 108 Wiles Ise were re•admsstrd below the bar, we found the Earl of D•rtthry em bis legs, impressing o■ their Lordships the eintemity of • rigid adherence I• future to the rule of cros•Maminalion ohm* had been resolved on. Lind Volta m' observed, that without wishing to east the slightiat imputalimi us soy of their L or d s h i p s , he should be extremely sorry indeed tiler thought that soy of their Lordships could vote so or so es this snomentous question because soother Noble Lent did the owe. The Marl of Darnley explained. The Emil of Darlington recalled.° the recollection of the Hoare Mato. Friday lest they had beim obliged to adjourn their peameselieci at so smiler hour tbs. they would under other Circumstances Isswe thought ♦wiper, is consequence at' We Majesty's Counsel sot baying then patent • German littotreter. It Iris se Is he dueled to NNW ot Mane to thine Come, that they hod not begs as powided, 'bey ✓ot lassie( has aware before hind AM • alines if thee laaguage was to be ~.mined. Mow he WNW Isom to see. gen i is order to obriotethe rororratios of • Is ar isms. usiukaue, mut so secokama. or rather facilitate. their lard. ship' proceedings, that they should ogres IS haw Inetrue- Woos given by the Mohair turd Lesasod lAIVEN Mt onallaelt N the Coosisel oat both aides, that a list of the witnesses is be examined rich day is mappers of the Bill should bo wished the preteding ceasing to her Majesty's Comad o is order that they might be prepared giro their Irdeepralai in whatever laoguage the willossors weight give their Matson whether they should he Eppel's% Afahll4ll4o, Alhessassi or Arabs. The Earl of Liverpool thought that the LAOIS* IM omit it rule would be attended with extreme ihcaressiesos to both parties; besides. he did not see how it was at all prnetiati Me to lay it down, for the production of gammon at psi• titular time@ depended very albeit asta riecussiattcos car lineally happening. The suggestion was areartliogly dropped. Cowart were them called to the bar, and informed by the Lord tioarkellne, that the Howse coomented, under the spa cial circodostances of the ease, to allow the Comsat for the Quet'h to proceed with their crentexaminations in the au laer ropused by them at the her of the Illoase.-..ausuiy, that immediately after the nominate** of the witoteases in chief should have bees finished by the Cianellel fur the Bill, her Majesty's Crionsel should commelite their entos.exastion tiow, sod carry it ea to such extent as they might *eon St ang, with a liberty to call bock any witness or epitomes at • rotate period, and crusa.examtisso than a setsed lime to whatever extent they should desire. The last witless, Barbara Kr-we, was thee immediately called to the tsar, soil her croosexasinatiom combated by the Queen's Attorney-Getters,. Where do you live now? In a private house. Where ? leash ray How far is it from this! I cans in • coach; I doet brow bow far it is -.-. —.- Which side of the river is it ! We nate over a belittle. Who lives is the house with pm? Chili the people of the house. Wttere dors your brother livet With me. In the same house? Yes Has he given you any money? No. Did he never give you any mosey! No. Never. at any time! Nu. Did he never promise you any at a (stare time He sever promised me any Meg; how eon be promise me soy thing' Do you mean to my he had no mosey of his ow.? Osly that which he took from home. What trade is your brother! He makes pots. Is be a workman, or does be conduct the looniness! He is the master of the mannfactoty. What is yunr father! My father was • setjeaat is the •rmy, but he is dead. Is your mother alive? No; bat I have a father.imlaw. What is your step father! Ha was a sa•ster weaver, bet be no longer carrier on business, beanie be is two old. Did no person give you any money ►efore you cams over here? No, except the ducats I spoke of. Did nobody promise you mosey! Ni,. Did nobody promise to give you any money whets you went back from England to Carlsrshe ? Nobody. Will you swear that nobody promised to give you any advantage of any sort after going back from England! No body pl omis ed ine any thing, but they said I should have a compensation when I returned. H .w mooch compensation can't say what I shell get. Who told you you should get a compensation! Oar Minister. Which Minister ? I said to hint, " I was to be compen sated for the loss of my situation." (The other Interpreter translated the last answer- 4 I stall lose my place, and I should get some compensation.") What Minister! M. Von Berksted and be mid that if I did not go I should be forced. Who is 31. Von Berksted ? As far as I know, a fdlluliter. Whose Minister! I don't know. _ _ _ IP he :Minister to the Grand Dube of Baden? Ido •ot know whether he is Minister for Foriepi Affairs or the Interior. _ _ Do you mean to say you do not know whether he Mose of the Duke's own Altuisters, or a Weisser from • foreign Court ? Yea, Ido not know , 1 bad any besieges with that gentleman but just this. Did M. Von glerksied MIA for you? Yee. Did nut M. Von Kaden come to look at the room which the Princess had occupied in the ion ahem you lived? did nut see him. you know that be was there for that purpose? I easel tell ; I nerve saw him. After the Prince*. left the inn, did any other gentleman come to look at her room ? I saw nobody but M. Vim Grimm ; he came in there and walked about. How long bad be lodged in the into? 1 can't say this; I paid no attention to it; I bed other lousiness. lo what part of the home dud he live? In the rooms Nos. 13 and 14. Before the Princess arrived he lived in Nos. 12 and 13. Did he not give up No. 12 for the accommodation of the Princess? Yea, so far as I have seen. Did he sot retort. to' that room otter the Princess was Roue, to look shat was there ? Yes, be ran about and went through the room. Was there any hotly with him when he came to make this inspection? There came two other gentlemen, one of them his brother. What was the other gentleman? I can't tell. Was he an Englishman, or a German! I never heard him speak English, but I psid no attention to this. What is M. Von Grimm? As far as I beard, he is She Ambassador from Wuriemberg What is his brother? I caul tell that r Mier. How often brd you' seen the Princess before the day you say you went into the room and found her with Kerman! I had peen her very little before; I had tun much occupation to suffer that. Did not you wait on her at breakfast in the morning? No. Did you never see the Princess as breakfast in the morn ing? Once I came la, when I was Intake a mantle to clean, and saw her at breakfast. Was it after that time that you saw her in the room with Dereami in the evening ? Yes, after. Does she mean that she was called in and saw the Princess at breakfast after the evening in the room? Yes; they had spilt something, which 1 was ordered to take away. Was it after she had been called in to wipe up that slop, that she saw the Princess and Bergaini together in the eves. ing ? Yes, after. Where did the Princess dine on that day, on the evening of which she saw her with Bergamot? 1 can't say this; don't know. Did she dine Ist the inn! Nu; 1 bid slot sews It; she had nut dined with us. Did they ever dins at the ion the whole of She days limey were at soar house! I hail 'hewer seen it with respect to dim mer; 1 ouly know it respecting breakfast. Did she never dine the whole of the time they were there? I can't swear to that, hi coos, I never saw it at the time. Will your swear that Itergaon and the Princess did not dine every day at Court, while they were iii your house? I can't know whether they dined at home, ur where they lid you see the Princess and Ftergansi and the rest of her Royal Nightie's', sour gu lo Court while they were Own? I hare seen them 'wire gine% away and returning, hut wheihrr to Court I don't know. Had you seen the Grand Duke come to the to wait on her Royal Highness? I hsre semi the ("mad Disks and several other Gentlemen come op to the Primers'. [Another hitermeter who stood beside the witness, having suggested some alteration ia the translation ,( the last assailer, end occasionally Infuse was asked by Mr Brougham whether he had ever examined the evilness befure ?—wiseiher he had ever before interpreted hetweea her and another per son ?—or wheliter be had seeu her since stile bad been last at the bar ? To all of which questions the reply was is lbe negative, and the cross-examination proceeded.) What do you steam by corning tips—was it to pay their respects to the Princess? Yes, probably. Did you kappeu to ace the Gantt Duke come to visit the 7. Meals waft Am gi t=r; *A l l rim dare asinithall the INN Where did her Rost Highness reeekeo the Net they woe upstage. aw a Doss she aeon to al that the Grand lONm Is Nit the Prises at she maw whew she out of her INGO ! 1611 SI MIMS 1 110 . I .ll. lll gull Boll tr 1 watt down. _ -•- Dees she ones* thet the &sod Dote sod hie giallo, lassedistely alter she IA the room where MN Mews was! I ens% say Shaba it was Nesanse day, se Nam at late. Will she weer that the Greed Deke did es seas on that dap Oe pay his respects? I a.sR Mr; I was slow is the hoes, and hod ocespetions ' • I did net pay atteation. Who gave ' , es the order la terry water to that sew! Nobody told as to do so; it Ina ay busiwas, which I knew, and I did it every evades. When you saw Si. bed the fret snorsisg, as yes INA se, wee 11 ea the ties yea were states; the bed ? Ti., whew it was to be made, feet bad sodas' otherwise to de wish the bed. Had yes wade any of the ether beds is the house that searaise ? No; lbw was she Ara made when they left it, esetpt the bed Noy waste wad his wife. Wham else says, N what they left it," does she mesa what the Princess sod Searsoi left it! Yes. • The wilier den stated that it was the roost No. IS she want. Was any body is the rasa whew she wade the lord ! No body except a sass with a Ames coat, who ease WM the MM. When you were esakieg the WV Tee, whoa I was ask ing the bedoe miaow in tersiog the mattress. Who was that sensed ? This way two of thew, but I did not observe vast they woe closely. Ned you ever men then before! Neva escape when the Princess was there. Have you sect sees then ante! No, not sisee she left the Wiese. Did you ever see diem at say tidier time whew yes were amities the bed in that roofs! Ido sot kilow; they sewer rens iris tbe roues except is the sinewisi, wires 1 woe wok keg the bed. Did you wake the bed is No. It every Neornisfr! Yes. Did yes see woe or Will of ahem perms' every seersisg! Now sad dies I have pees use of them is the roost. _ Did any of them waist you re inside, the bed me any other day? Yes, awe and thee awe of them came Woe the room and assisted me; sommiwies be remeneed, sometimes be west out agues. Have you may doubt that they were the Priem's% str eams? Piebebly, they came with her. Did not they p away se well sa they came with her! As far as I know, they weal. Wee ore of them a Yager? I dotal know; oar of them wore a poem coat; I bed sot gnestioned them. le that COOTIMNIOOII with Mr. Ireksted about a wiespew ration for aiming here, what did you say to him ? I said to him, must I gu ? fur that if I am not obliged, I censor leave home, es I am a married women, and have other Wei. SKIN to attend to. [At this period of the preceediags, • Peer (we usiderstond the Part of Hardwieke) was taken suildeely ill, is mew (tome., we presume, of the hest of the Heine, and was COO. wryed into as adjoining room.] What did he say is answer to that ? He said Ilast if I did not go willingly, I should be (weed, and then I asswered— thew I will go, mad God may settle the business (eraft the moult) se he pleases. (The witness having here manifested symptoms of weak. arse, a glass of water and a chair were piovided her her, by the direction of their Lordships, and the cresowasination wee seepeaded for a few minutes.) Has her family received the promise of any thing? Ise. Wilt you swear that no preemies has been gives to your husband or any of your family? lan swear that *Wring has he.. promised-to tile, sad I Iliwik snaking to my fwaly, or I should have known it. Wm the 16 or IB ducats she received got for going to Hanover? I can't say. Mich do you recluse the ducat was which the gentleman pee you is the morning—was it ■ present, or for your trouble ? He gave it one for my trouble that I went shore. How far was it that you went to the inn It rosy be half of a quarter of an hour's walk, but she caul exactly say. How tong did you remain with him--the detest gentleman! The ant time I did not stay long. How long did you stay the second time? Not long at all, for I was just order the stairs when be gave me the ducat, and I west away. . , Were any of the gentlemen you sw called Mandeville, or Man-Devil? I do not meow. What do you usually get from a person who sleep' a night ■t an ion and goes away in the morning It was cosnaion ly given to the wailer, and went into a common purse. What is your share fur balf a year? It was divided every quarter. How midi for the quarter then? Sometimes 18, 20, sad 30, according to the clamber of strangers coming to the inn. 18, 20, mud 30 what? Florins. Do you know a place called the Glass-house? Yea, she does. Is there not a place which goes by that name near the gate of earlsruhe, visited as a pleasure-garden ? Yes, many pervious go there. Have yon ever been there? I have been there with my husband fu► pleasure. Were you ever there before you had a husband Yes ; with the permit' who became her husband. Was you ever there with any body else, or alone ! With bee ►usband, other servants, and maids. Have you ever been there without your husbaad or alone ! Never with any body else. Did she ever go ■lone before she was married ? Never, except with hrr husband. But beru►e you knew your husband? I went with my brother and mister by days— by night. About w bat time in Ike morning used you to make the beds et the Mu at Carlsruhe ? I went when the Gentlemen rose. Do you swan that ye■ always went into the room wham the Gentlemen ruse! Sometimes l weal in earlier *miaow,. Uses later. Alter you had seen the person whom you took for the Primers' to Hergami's room, did you not go to see if the Consilium of Oldi was in her room ? A. No; I took water, sad went to No. 5, and they were standing there. Did she nut go to No. 5, to see if the Countess of Oldi was there? I went first there. Did she hut go for the purpose of seeing if the Countess ofOidi was there? I went and a. aril that it war the— Some rtimht bring brie expressed as to the cur►eclne+e of the interpretation of the avower, it was proposed to repeat the que►tiur. M.. Brougham submitted that if there was any doubt it would lee Is ufficieri for the witnesss to repeat her answer. The question below again pot, the answer civet, waste ho; . 1 first carried the water there. Mr. Reportbent appealed to Noble Lords even who did not understand Berman, it its the answer first gives there was not aline mention tattle Princess? The loterpreier—" She callused ber reply by repealing half a Petitroce se►eral times." The Lord Chasmllor, addressing the interpreter, informed him that is was out his duty to collect the meaning of the witness, but merely to repeat her words. Mr. firoughani—'. And if she repeat the words twice do sou sio Itkewm." Will you Raresr that you did Rot go to that room to see if the emulates' Oldt wee there' I weal first there to carry the water. That is no answer to toy qesestion. Will you swear bat you did out go in part for the purpose of seeing if else Camases• elldt was abets! I email say this ; I did sot go fur that purpose. I ha►a sever thought I should be asked about it. Will you, upon the oath you have takes, swear that re never told any pennon that Too did so to the mina' IM C0e191 , 08 te see of she were there or rot ? I eases recollect. I hare no 'booed •rose it whether I have said ilea say body. 11;111 you swear Astro. newer bad any coweentatitte with awy penes' about pi wig into the Cawatesa Ohio's roam that sight ? l can't owesr that leaver had say coawcraatiwo with any body. Mr. Llreeghem mid the treaties pot by the ImerpreMer . , ▪ • you moat lot Ism - mesh shies pis same I. ersentsp bed ainismersatina with say body about gums So the CassokeseOldes Amass! Nis • with stobotly. lattorproter—lbe sor t " ... eines Ik/roman has any body embed Me Mr. attleflttas-- a Ayltralfliso Amt r Ye., two Gentle men Isere asked Parr. Nee she bed boy cotiolimitiois wish any body besides those Ins Gentleman Mount 40 happened withal ought ! Yes, at Hoooree and Frnablast. las massif tabeeinse. At Hammer who upoke is her abets it ? As Ambassador; she does sot know h s same. And at Frankfort who ! It was • Gentleman ; I don% keen his nerve. How bag bare you been at Frankfort at one lime ! Fire or eis slays. Hate pm bees at Frankfort et any other time ! No, we. ver„ ' , seep( when we west to Hanover we passed through Freakier.. Who have yes spokes to so Obese relereb in this coun try ! Two gessiesses have come to use me, but who they are I dos% boon. Have you ever 'pokes to say one besides doom two restle ss,. ! No. Do you know a Captain or Major Junes in this country . ? No, 1 brow nobody. Du yes boon of either of the two geollemen you talked Mesa speak Gamma ! Yes, iaassms..h as I did hear use of them speak German. Do you koow his name ? No. Was he • German ore as Englishness ! I don't know ;be spoke Gemara. Besides Om house you are now !ivies at, have yea ever been is say Miser home in London ? No ; 1 have been so where the Enteert here. When wee the Arm time she was in this house? Friday, lea week. Rd yen never been here before? No. Wks von soy you have never been in say other house to this cousin, du you mean that you leave never edt. d ■t any Niter, rte neve► been in say other at all ? When bike ar rive✓ she went teas betel for a few boors. Willy.. swear that except is those two houses you have sot bees Jollity other fur ever so short a space of time ? Nu, so vrbere else. How many servants were the►e at the inn at Carleruhe where you lived? Two waiters, a pvithey, a groom, and a howeessid. Was theme., other chambermaid besides yourself' No, I was 'homely we. How many maids came with the Princess! 1 have sees may two sad the Countess Oldi. By la rd IllaissieW—When the courier came forward to order isoadet bads, did he give any reason fur the elle. ratios flr. Browhaul !submitted that Ilse reasons of the courier would at be evidence, and the question was withdrawn. By Lord Illamifield—When the witness made the beds in the morning, sad observed the stains, had the bed the appear. awe of hawing been slept in by two persons Nu; the cushions lay seem, the other, so far I recollect. By teed Falmouth—Whet the witness in a firmer part of her canalisation said, " I went to make the b d ghee they bird left ;" what does obi mean by "they ?" When she west there was no one in the room; she could see nobody. Had you any conversation wish any person respecting whet you had observed of her Royal Highness and Bergman I wryer mode observations to soy body. The Ptincess, she says, jumped up, sad witness was frightened; after that recut did she communicate it to any *se! I spoke to nobody about it, (mein to M. Von Grimm, who imbed ms about it. Mew hug after the Prisons had left the iota were these question asked pie' V 8000 at they VIM sway M. Yea Grimm asked mae. Asked you what ? He asked me into his room, but then I was unwilling to say; he asked the again ■ml them I said it. I waist to know what the witness was asked? He asked me, " base you seen any thing?" A Noble Lord, who spoke from the gallery, said, that it appeared to him the House lost pint of the evidence from Ike Interpreter's imperfect knowledge of English. Mr. Brategbani begged to soy, that lie Interpreter who had yet stood at that bar, hod a better konseledgeof the English language than the gentleman now at the bar. The Lord Chancellor asked if there were not two of them ? Mr. Broughams said there was, and though in the course of this examination his Interpreter had been on duty, the other bad stood behind bins and had nut dissented from his interpretation. The Earl of Lauderdale said, he had not hitherto put a single gantlets in elicit ary fact which he bad learnt from his situation as • member of tbeir Lordships' Secret Cont. miller. The Noble Lord made some observation on the highly irritated state of public feeling, the purport of which escaped us. By the Earl of Lauderdale—When the Princras was at breakfast, wise was with her ? They were all there. Can she state what gentlemen, and what ladies> The Countess, and the tither gentlemen who were with her. When abeearried water to the chamber No. 12, and saw the Princess there, did she the next night carry water in a similar manner? No; it was then abut, and 1 placed it be fore the dyer of the room. Did she, after finding the Princess in that room, generally find the door shut or open when she curled water? Shut; many times shut, nod many times open. Does she mean by shut, merely closed or locked? I in. tended several times to gu in, hut it wee locked. Mr. Brorgbam begged to put a question again through the Lord Chancellor, as there were some doubts as to the answer which the witness had given. _ _ By the Lord Chancellor—Did the witness 9ey she found the door locked twice, or several times! 1 did not think so exactly twice, as several tunes. 1 he witness ass then ordered to 11 ithdraw, and the Attor. vary-General was desired to call another. . . . . . G uisepps Bianchi was theu called, and being placed at the bar was sworn. Mr. Deumau thee objected to the Merl hese Spinetto being allowed to act as interpreter of this venues 'a evidence, us the ground of his having seen sod:conversed with him he. fore, the Marchers bowleg in fact interpreted the deposi tions of the witness on the occasion of a private examination which he had undergone previously to being called upon to give evidence before their Lordships. The Eael of Liverpool said, that be saw nothing in the °Nevins' which bad bees stated by the Learned Counsel, that he thought could by any means induce their Lordships to order that the Marchese Spinettu should no longer ma tinee to net as interpreter, or that he should not be permit ted to interpret the evidence of the witueas now at their Lordships' bar. He acted in this case, and it was well un derstood to he so, as interpreter on the part of those who supported the Bill; and it was therefore perfectly natural, suit as fisr as be could see perfectly nuolijectiouable, that be should be employed by them to interpret ally previous state. meet which the wittier might make of such facts of this case as he could speak in cvideuce. Besides which, there was an Interpreter in attendance on. the other side as a cheek upon him, and he (Earl of Liverpool) did not think that any sub stantial objection could he grounded on the fact of hie hew ing been so employed, against his confine ing to perform those duties ass interpreter, his ability, attention, and fidelity, in the discharge of which their Lordships had had such ample opportunity of wituessing.—( B Hear, bear, Amsr!"— " Goes, re on.") Mr. Peek tiles proceeded lo the examination of the whom, _ _ Whaicepositrynssis are you ? Aa Italian Swiss. In what part of Switzerland were you burs ? I■ the de pertinent of Viciso. Whore go you live? At Venice. What is year occupatios—what do you do at Venice? I sea porter (duorkreper) at the Braude Brdagna Ise at Veslee. dam len have yen been in that employ ? Fourteen yam. 1m,411:. .'gplevrtib l tma* fa% see Ire elaiimki se • mattet shiest Elll lauJostodoti owl Writer inn loth Wand; oat if els alsort. writer's! wiles. , yew swear Not you sever Isero hod soy rowowestion ylotroso shoot piss ism tire Gomm OW. wow Illot WON? The Geotkosess whom 1 waist d upon bad . b. Pels ossearor waist PrieteeS ii Wales at V e Bi c ,' I de ; Settee. Whee wee the lest lime gee sew her Regal Higbee's... l whet year? About Av. years .g.. Wee she as she bromide Besieges! the wee shire ant days, end shoe she removal fete she Ismer egjeistieg. Whet peruses seeetepeeiesl bee Royal Hestsess. at that Vim! Thew wee t Rost tbambertair,a etteeed dumbe. !sae, end three couriers. What were the Names of the coterie's? C 11111•111 wee one, Beribolumert Bergs& soother, and Theuelere aleimei n the third. After We 1160 lambs had ►emoved into the next Wow, bad yes Me, why oreemoios to p these! Ti.; every day.. *hilt was *imam or your foist there every day? B e . Cline it slurs,* lopposawal SW I alwald have Weary/ avow thing there / o r he. Royal littlitirse. Do yew ►member to hove seta a .ievietler there one Jay 6 Yee. - Ihs you know whetlwe her Royal Highness betlght ar• thing of him! Yes ; she boned ■ Venetian amis. Was that at dieser time, or before or after dinner' Vie jeweller rime when they were pin 00 rift' from d in „,,. Did yeti ore Rerpsai is the more as that time , H e 'i f always near the choir of her Royal Mob Hess How was he dressed? He worr his courier's drew. Did you see She Princess sad Retried towhee that Ire after the misplay had left the dialog-rooms ! Yes. What passed Mitweere them at that - time' She, after Ilny had got np , took the Amite froth her neck and placed it on the courier's week, he took it off, sod pot it *gain reload En sick ; and Own he took her by Ike hand and mcompamet her isle the wiloom where coffee was prepare's. Vol they go mit of the town together' Yea; hot let. genii afterwards come hark into the room. Did yes observe any Otitis chw? No. Alter Bergamo had pot the chaise round her Hord Hitt, newts Deck, did they remain any time is the moos? lbey went sway immediately. Did you see Bergamo, when her Royal Highness was at Irewee the second time? Yea; the second time 1 did ste him. It oaf whew aloe came from Naples, sad lodged three or four days at the woo. Had Bergamo, any ordere tto at that time? He had a vein of orders and jewels; sot pereions stone., Mat order,. . . . Did you hear by what 'tame he was called at that time. They called hint Berms Bergami. When they went unt of the room on the occasion which you have spoken of, denial the first tome they were at h . . nice, Mow did they conduct themselves before leaving the room! lie took her by the hand, and they went to the Jour of the saluou, abe went tutu the saloon, and Retrial welt away. Did you are the Prior's, and Bergaini lo!ether the second time of their being at Venice! I sw them go in sad oat of the tweet Sucellier every day. Hues many times did you see that ► They went out very frequienily ou the different canals in a gondola. Were they alone in the boat, oe did any body elm accom pany them! Tbere was always some other person will darn exerpt twice. When you ram them go out, did they walk together nr separate ? They walked arm is um ; also be gave bet his band to go into the gondol., se I did. The last caption; was 'Pokes by the triers while the Interpreter was delivering the preceding pert a the answer, which being noticed, the Interpreter desired hint inn to say any thing whole he was speaking, as by that mesas part of the maswer would be lust. The witness was th►■ asked what lie meant by the words" ea I did!" but he did not seem to understand the inquiry. The last /nesting was therefore re peated to the wares., ea also his answer literally, mad he was then again asked, What did pow mews by the wends " As I did ;" did you also walk arm in arm with the Pi ID irefie! No; I never took her arm, but I have often taken her hand to hand her into the gondola. Crose.exasinell by Mr. Dentnan: 1" hen you sew that affair of the chain which you mes. tioneil, were you looking through the key.hule? I was in the sameettom with Rent; the room where Obey Abut 'rhea the Princess sod Bergemi could see you quill plainly! 1 was there. Hare you ewer been at Mao to he uxanoiard ? Ye.. Marts was the first lime of your eoalg to 311 tall to be ex amined! 1 left Venice about Christmas. Was that the that time you went to Milan gni this bat:. peas! Yea. What reason bad you to go there t I was sent for. Have you received soy money, or have you paid your eel expenses ! A commissary fetched me from ileauct, and ',ay.! the expenses of the jourory. Have you been promised nothing fur your loss of tint.' Nothing. What have you received for costive here ? Nothing, bat the travelling caprioles have been paid. W hat Itarliaia . have you suede; *hat pay are you to haat /or coming here? Nothing. Will you swear that you have not received any thing, sect that you do not expect to receive any thing for your lots of tirue in cumin here? They wly told Inc when 1 case bat 1 was so tell the troth. Whoa are yun to be paid for telling the truth ? 1 have made No sinew/vat; if they give me any thing Isbell take n. Do yun expect anything? 1 respect owthinz, for this rea son, that 1 Lave brought money with me to take me beck again. From whom did you receive Itt From Colonel Brown, at Milan. Did you see any person at Milan of the mime of Yam3r esti ! Yes. Did you never say any thing to Vilmareati or to Culor.el Brown about some compensation for your loss of time and your trouble! 1 said nothing, but that I would not come, because 1 was afraid. Were ibry the oily persons who said any thing to yen about your coming herr And Andrrossi, the commissats who friched me from Venice. How long have you been in England? hest a fortnight to-day. Du you still belong to the inn, or what is become cf your situation there? If Igo back again quickly, I shall return to it; if null shall be obliged to bud a new master. If !fun do not return, and thereby lose the place, do you not expect the loss to be made good to yea in money ? I expect nothing, because I know nothing. Vo you mean to say that you have made iso bargain, and that you expect nothing fur your Kos of time, and your trouble io this business ? lam come here to speak the truth without any pay. Has any body lately told you to give that answer herr ' Nu. With whom have you lived since you hi.. be.. in Eng land ? With five ur siz•aad•tweuty persons, of whim I hardly know oue. Is Theodore Majoechi one of the number? Yea. Awl will you swear that you have hail no conversation with Majocchi about the evideoce you were to give here ? I swear il. Did rim remind Majucchi that you had seen him ith't he Pi Meese at Venire The Alai time 1 saw him, because they canoe together; but the armed time he remained behind. 1 nit-au to ask, whether upon seeing Majucchi here in Enc.. land, you reminded him that you had known him at Veins. ' Yes; 1 told him so, because we west to drink together slit , dinner. Here you breakfasted with Majocchi during the last fort night ? Yes; se breakfast and dine altogether. And do you sup together? Those who want supper, take supper; and those who do mot, take ■one—tbase who are present and want supper, sup together. And do you peas the whole day together? Not the whole day, because Alsjoectii is with his wife; bat sometimes hi conies out, sad we walk together. Do you ►ember the name of the jeweller of who her Royal Higbeess bought the chant at Venice ! Yes; his MUDS is Fain. Is he wee of the tweaty-five that are with rpm ? No; he is always at Venice. Where does he live at Vestice ! He has • shop la the oIJ city, near Sae Marco. Had the jeweller kft the room when the Priam, sad Ber• pint remained together! He was goose away wise tome. Had all the company who had diaed left the room ? They . . bad, How lout had the etwapaop left Ibe rouse Th.y ware just guae , about (bre* or four minutes. UM '‘ TIFT