The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-06 00:00:00

M.MS. A11111VEI)-1 74Tr.ita', I Guernsey, 1 Jersey, G Outtenburgh, t Gneinsey, I Jersey, , 2 Waterford. pituln: OF STOCKS THIS•PArAT'tivrNE o'cLockc. Consols ~. ...... • . STIN. FMAUM AUDEAT ? e () I) N, SATURDAY, MARCH 6, 1813. Strangers were again excluded last night from the House of Conithons, during the very interest ing-and important discassion that tool; place re lative to the PRINCESS of WALES. WC have, howeVer, been enabled to obtain the principal points of the debate, to the detail of which we have only room merely to refer our Readers. , A. vessel arrived at Deal yesterday from France, in sivhours, which, brings a report. that Dantzic was in possescdon of the Russians. No official intelligence of tbi , event lqts bey' , re-1 ecived ; hut, from the silence of the Illonitour, there is no doubt of the victorious progress of the Russians, and prob Ably the whole of Prussia is now iii their possession. His Majesty's ship Apelles arrived at Leith on , Wednesday, from weruize,during which, in Lat. 57. 10. Long. 5. 30. E. she cdptiired 'the French privateer Le Ranisseur„of 11 guns and 51 men, out from Dunkirk q days", without making any captures. , The , CoMmander of the- i/pelles, Cap tain CHARLES R,osit, Was unfortunately washed overboard, in a storm, *on the 27th ult. and the Apellei was obliged to throw overboard twelve of her guns our of fourteen. r. The Channel Fleet, consisting of t 1 Poyne, nogalSoveeign, Duncan, iThercrarabie, Coaquesta. dor, and Magnificent, which had put back, sailed again . from Plymouth on Thursdq. Lisbon Papers to the 21st ult. r,eachcd:town this wrning, A 'Malta Mail also arrived. 'lt appears by a dispatch from the Marquis of ‘VEL- Lt - HGToN, that no movement of importance had occurred in the armies. Acconnts from Badajoz speak of several detachments of Fvench trooPs being about to march for France, together with a number of horses; nod again mention, that Jo sr.rn had given notice l of his' intention to, go to Paris. The folloWing are extracts. Lasnox; Fun. 17.—8 y a dispatch from hii Ex cellency the Miirshal General, the. Marquis of TORRLS VCDRAS, dated Jerenada, the 10th Feb. oppears that no moyement of importhuee has occurred either in the army of, the enemy, or in the Allied Armies. BADAJOZ, F. 9.—They write frnm.-Talavera tie la. Reyna, under the date of the first of tills , month, as follows : The detachment's, which pre go ilia' to France, taken from the 27th, 73d, 88th, and 94th regiments of infantry, have arrived. "They cansist each of 18 officers 'and men, aid 30 sub alterns, and are going to Toledo, where they tvill he joined by other detachments' from the regiments that are in that city and its They are all proceeding for Madrid, where they expect those which have been taken from the other regiments which I f ‘rent to Valencia,in order to join and uutrch to France. These detachments are token from the army of Soknir,front that denominated the army of Por tugal and of , the Centre. .thC rq4linenttl 03 and 94, go a did of bamdion, and a coanandant of the staff. We are assured that the .General :of Cavalry VENNIMECUM. of divisiOn of go - )ikewis'e for France, yOith 2000 horse. In consequence at , an order froni Sour. 7, on the 30th January, 'all the horses taheit in Talavera, as nseless, torn theCommissariesiof War, the Com initoaries cif Mapzineg, and otherT;omtnissaftes, an d from all the Officers : of . infantry uprto the Chiefs of battalion, are to be delivered -to the J'!!atinandaut of Dragoons of regiment No. 4. By order of the intrusive King, notices wete affixed lip Mddrid of the arrival of NApor,toN, at Park, .and that it was necessary that Sbotlid proceed to that ctpit4l"to visit his brother, and confer witli him op the important affairs of Spain. GIBRALTAR, FEB. 6.—We learn by the •Malta UM!, that another expedkion is fitting out at stud that Lord Wm. BENTTNCK . is not tO prOCAWCI to Alicant, as was expected. The Pitszczi RLGENT has been pleased to ap point Viscoant LAKE a Lord of the fiedelyioer.' yn,terclay Viscanstit CAOTLEREACH, bad an au diencv of Ike P4II+I6EII.EpENT at-Carlton HOuse. COvENT-GAttrozs,:- . --4;:,,gread sele (Amu of saered Music WiAttperformetthere last CATALANT 'and linAnAm, were the ebief'singers. Mrs. 4At MON', Miss DOLTON, and Mr ! LACY, also acquitted theinselvos very weII., IMPERIAL I):VIILIAMENT. ' 'IIOII3E, °F . -LORDS, • FRIDA,T, MARCH',S. , The Duke of A-rnor. and Lord Kixo took the oaths and their seats. in the, Appeal (:Inge, the "Bank of SCotland v, Watson," Sir S. Romilly, and Mr. Leach .a ere heard for the appellant, and the Attorney-General, as leading Counsel for the reSpondent. The LORD CILANCELLOR in °posed Tuesday for the next hearing i dit on account of the interven ing bqneSs, that day was .not definitively settled on the part of his Loruship., The Crown Dabtors' Relief,- the :',alt Excise, the Cornish Millers Enlislment, and a few other, chiefly private, Bills, were brought upfront the Commons by Mr. Lushington, Mr. Adding ton, and other Members, and respectively read a first time. EAST INDIA AND - CATHOLIC QUESTIONS. The Earl of I •,Dtattly .preiented a Petition 'from the Merchants, Trade i rs,, , others, of tile' . Borough of Preston, in 'Lancashire, agaiiiit the cOntinuance of the bast India Company's nrono poly, and *observed, that the Petitioners wished to• be heard by their Counsel or Agents, in support of their allegations. His Lordship.presented another Petition to the ssuue e,ffeet, froin*:-.hton-udder4,ine, in the said comity, ivhich tijo4 read, was, with the I;re . .; ;aid,,, ordered to, laic on the table. Lord Viscount by ebnumwd of his Royal HighneSs the Prince Regent, presented tists of the names of those RoulAn Catholics vrho taken the oaths Linder the, . I .l.ele'vaut ActS, pur suance of an A...ddtess of their Lord hips. These documents were, ou the motiOn o!' Lord Yos, ordered to be printed for-the use of the House. • -Lot d HOLLAND presented a Petitiim from the Protestant Dissenters'of the City of Exeter, in &your of the Catholic Claims, and praying for the establishment of full liberty of conscience. . Lord Rous t , who bad on a former evening pre sented a Petition' of a.contrayy native from .the saw, city, observed:, that the Meeting at which 'that .Petition/was votel, ‘vas one of the largest ever known in that* city and. that tivehundred 'Dissenters signed - • • • Lord flou...A:Nn stated, that With respect.tathe individuals alltukd they had been opposed. „to these Ch.tiins, under'the mistaXen notion that the oaths reunited by the Acts., which .the Catholics of both • Vingland. an' Ireland tow freely to9k, Were those which they } ratted to get rid of. • • After, a few farther words in the 4q of ex, planation between thes Noble 1.40rd:3, she Petition was orderetl to lie on the table, and the Hous‘ adjourned. till Moliday, • 110USLI Ck COMMONS, FRIDAY' MARCH 5. • , Sir C. rotE bronght up the Report of the Peni broke Committee, which declared ,Sir J. Owen to be duly elected for both the County and the 80 , rough. jt.stated the Petition! against his return • neither frivolous nor vexatious. Mr. CARTWRIGHW,, from the Liverpool Commit tee, reported th,u G. Canning, Esq. and Geniral Oascorgne (the Sitting'Members,) %Fere duly elect-; • ed, but stated the. Petition to he neither frivO 'lolls nor vexatious, , A new writ/was. ordered for tbe. Borough of Pembroke, in the room of Sir .1. Owen, who having been elected to represent bot4theßorough and the County.of Pembroke, has made his elec-, tion to serve for the„County. • The SrgArati thought it might be convenient to the liouse to be apprized, that as Mondbyoext was - the last (1 ty of f reetiiving_private Bills, it was his intention to come to the House ou that day at three'o'clocki then to take the Chair if enabled to do so': • • • Mr, U. MORNTON brought in a Bill to relieve certain perSons.confined in the , King's Bench and Marshalsea PriSons,.wl o being natives' of Ireland had not the same advantages aftbrded'tn them at' present as, frotaexis‘ing arrangements, were en joyed 6y other'pri.soners. Mier a few words from Mr. S. Wortley, the Bill wilA read a first, and ordered to beyead se cond time. • • . Colonel 1% 'moved the second reading of a the object of which - was to alter a Clause in ;the Breeknoek ean'al Bill...lfewishtAjhe Bill to snifered-t4 go fo a Committee, Where its Me rits might he discuoied., If, when before a. 0071- IH;a6C, either of the•partieS COneerned could prove 'a disposition on the part' of the other to establish a monopoly, against. such monopoly he should vote. I , Sir C. MORGAN 'moved as an Amendment, that the Bill 5110111 d - be read a second time can, that day six months. • After a discussion,- - in which Lord 'A. SeymOur; Mr. Prirtheroc, Mr: Harvey, Alr: Lewis, Mr. J. P.. Grant,. and other 4loliourable Members par ticipated, the - . Gallidry was Cl'eared' for a •,diVi-- sion. We understand, on dividing ; the. hers w.orer-- , • For the'Amelidment,..a....... ... 164 Against it . The Bill was*therefore lost. When the division was over, Mr. LYGON moved that strangers should not be admitted, and Mr. BENNET moved an adjourntnent, to establish his right (4 meeting the clearing of the gallery on such ground. He did not, however, persist in dividing upon the question. Mr. COCHEANE .JonNsToisix then rose 'in pursti once of his notice, and said, that it was the un doubted right of the Hon. Member (Mr: Lygon) to act as had done, in clearing the Housed strangers : if, however, this preca utiun had been taken under the impression that any thing he had to say should be unbecoming the respect he owed to that,House, .or inconsistent with what was due to the feelingto - of every branch of the Royal such ap prehensions were utterly Untounded. He thought it a duty be owed, in the first instance, to the Princess of Wales, to declare, that for the motion be was about to submit, he had no authority from her ; that be had had no, communication Avid) any person or persons whatsoever, and that the pro. ceeding originated entirely and exclusively with himself.' !rue Tiononrahle Areinherproeceled to obFerre, that it well , knOwn that a Commission-had been granted by the King.in.lB96; to four Noble - Lords, Grenville, Spencer; - Erskine, axd Ellenborongh, to,eXamine.intO certain allegations' that Inuf been preferred agaiiiit the Princess of Wales. _He then, react the whole of the Report made by the Coln mit;:ioner,, above stated, containing the. most. un qualified opinion, that the.tharge produced by sir John and Ludy Douglas against. che'Princess of Of having been delivered of a child in the". `year 1E302, Was, utterly destitute of truth. It add ed, that the birth and real mother Of the child,' said to have been horn of the PrincesS,, had beep proved beyond all possibility'of ..doubt. '.i,she Re port concludes with some 'objections made by the Commissioners, to the manners, or to levity of manners, upon chtl'erent occasions, in the Princess.' , • The Honourable Member next proceeded to state, that the paper he should now read was a document which lie was ready to prove at the bar of the Voase wits dictated by Lord Eldon, Mr. Pet - ceval; anti Thomas,Plomer, though'Signed by the Princess of Wales : it was a letter written, 'or purporting to he written, by her Royal Highness to the King, on the ilth Oct. 1806, as a Protestagainst the-Report of the CommissioneiS, just detailed : the letter being read at length ap peared Lobe a formal and elnbi,rate ciriticisut upon the nature ofthe Commission under which het con thtct bad been re;iewedi it asserted '-fu the most nnqnatified terms her own innocence, and called the charges of her accusers aloui and false-con .svirney, made ex parte, and affording no. appeal. Unnn this letter .being read, the' Honourable Member observed, that lie fully concurred in the • SPiitil . llVMS it extrvssed Upon the subject of tire Cominission, and he' insisted that the charge againit the Princess before that - .Tribunal, by Sir 'John and . Lady Donglas, was nothing short of treason ; that if the COntinissionerS. had the power to acquit bur Royal. Highness neF,s of . the crime charged, th,ey had equally the power to convict her : what was, the state of that country in which , retch a thing were even poksi .. ble ? B'esides, he inquired, what became of, Sir ....1611n and Lady Douglas'? ,If lie were rightly in formed, they still persisted in the same 'story ; if ,all inaiimiined Were so:nOt'oribuidy false i why .wero not prosc`cuteto = The lion. Member went do to rein^o, that he', understooa jlo pro- ceedings of the late Pr'sry Connell, cxecpt the Re-• port, 11.1 d been tyitiv;initted to, the Princes:; cif Wale 3. This was the '(iaie in 1806; hut he stqnnitted that c'opies - of aill.tlloscxexamivationsShould be given to. her.. 'the Honourable Member then entic.lad .e4.l by inoyin , r,.firvt, a, vety ions Resolution, cni vitining'nearry the.whole. o the ii.eport of the Cominiesionet.in":lBo6, with his own reasoning ifpnn the illegality of such. a cominiSsion,,utld ter minating w!th expressing the‘expediencyot a new and different trial of,. or inquiry into, the same subject ; ~ the second motion was, for a variety of PaperS . connected with this subject, from 1806 to the present time. Lord CastLearaxin opposed the Motieo, and began .by observing upon thesifigular line of con duct adopted by the Hon. AioVer,. in first calli t ig upon the House to agree with him in all the facts stated it his lirst resolution; and theti asking for. inforuiatioa tin the same ,snhject in his'seCond mo tion f, at. all events, the information ought to have preceded the conehtsiotiS from it.ltis 'Lordship could not conceive,/from any reilsons titat had been given 'by the LI on.Metnber,tha t the FUonsewotilitentertain any serious doubt that the paperS calledfor by the lion. Alo4r . were at necessary. to remove any apprehosion us, to the.successor to the throne of tliese kingdoms., The Cominissioners of 180 ti had not been Commissioners for trial of thePrin , cess, lnit as Privy Counsellors, ComniissionciS of Inquiry, and that the appolutmeut of such Privy Counsellors for such purposes was the, eon - soot practice in all periods of the hiqory of this (Irian:- try. if‘ howetier, the Hon. Move,' was setioes in his opinion that the Comtniss;on of.ISOG improper. tribunal to have reviewed the conduct of the Priueess of Wales, did he think the [louse- of Comnions a proper place to try either the. PrinCeSs of Wales for treason or to sit in judgment. upon the levity of her manners ?,:; It was rather extraor dinary in the tion.Xember to call -upon the those a Commons to' clear up the doubts oh a sub ject when he had . expressed no doubts 'of his own; the two Learned Judges who were. part of' the CoMmission, Lords Erskine and EL-, lenborough,, had entertaified, no doubts : they, with their skill and legal habits, had been able to trace the whole transiretion to its source ; it was flot•a judgment ,upon credibility of witnesses only, tint noon the inconsistency alone of Lady Dou glas's testimony, but th e r ea l mother • of this child. Ann Austin was adduced, and its birth, with every .circumstance attending . ..it, had been clearly proved . to the Conimiion. This.ltel port, toa, of Commissioners, with,all Eli t e evi • derice on which: it was founded, ,had been re. ferret! to his Majesty's then . Ministers, and they, upan . oath, had unanimously confirmed that Re port. This was: noralf, the same lteport antfevidence had been referred.:to.the:sabsequent and they,,.in 4ke manner, on their oaths, bad tutu-, niwously:declared the innocence of i luer Highness. his Lordship did not mean to 6ay, that if ty great doubt could-be eutertaineel by his Ma r .'sty's subjects on this important and thgt cate question, Some declaration from Parliwnent, as to the succession, !flight not become necessary, but. when they have been so repeatedly'vegativeo, would it not, he asked, be giving as sort of weight ,and authority t o the Ovidence of Lany Dpuglas ? -If the affidavits of profligate persons were thus to be sanctioned, where would he 'the end of such attempts, ? Fortunately there never was a case that could , excite se, little hesitation.. A more p rm . ) g st l i n •i s i , t s is p v i id e ize it ; ion, wan to legislate on Lady Moyer had complained, was never heard. Th e H olt . plained, that. no proceedings had been instituted against Sir John and Lady Dkuglas. His Lordship . had to state, that the first Cabinet ' distinctly recommended a reference to theithen Law ()lbws of the Crown; to eonsider of stich a prosecution.; and if it had 'not been institut ed, it did not arise from any doubt in ,the minds of those Law Officers as to the punish ment that would be brought down upon them; but it' Was fru% a wish to avola biiotriug . , . such subjezt.s . befo . ..e the public, rfae)lsle added, that he did no? wish . to push the sa further ; lie w as treading.gn delicate gro unl thought the, onlv effect , of. the rata av sVoulil be t o - niake the 1-louse of Counnoo 8 r tiel for poisoning the public: inind. .81)1 subject of the late }et• e:., the Noble Lori lie:'' _saying any.ttling at pres'....•nt, that not bell :gm the lious.e. ' . Sir. ,S.ANwrt Rom,t,T.IN shorttY lindilt :L 4 charaetes.-s (lithe four (:::nuni ss ioners in ir well as the legality of iliAt Coininifsion, 1 IVIr. WiltnlttEAD rose awl said, dot flit' Alernher who made the motion had inforl floOse be lin.-: catinnunicAte:i his Otatit ) n .t . i ' he had done .:o ; and Mr. WI; Aliread toldlo he could not support it. illie.isinbi e L' ir , d , l) , l site . yjastlereae,ll`)On a-former occasioniol,''. that when the lion. , Meuil,er should prod:"' Motion to-night,' he won't! 'then furaoh altate formation that' was necessary regardlog `„* l ,, letter. lie had not -i.)''f,ir favoured tVi'ii' and therefore, if the motion went nif, 04 , 11 ,,, V.%13 Suitt Of thi; - letter; the Princess of 0 .57 , most unhappily.ani oufni tunately sitioict„ Noble Lord . talked of poisoning by publishing - the cast and inst doll o p Princess of 'Wales ; be only knew by viii"': 0 that the letter 'written by the Print:6s ' 4 , 1 0 in Sept. 'I 806, to the King, calling : ' h ,, ' i ' cally for publicity, and a Lance fair tr'''",:dd been, dictated by Lord_Eidon, by Alr.re lc o e ' ~/, Sir flios. Monier. This 1:! , ....t ha.l °r o of" serted iu the . in.,...,..e . , , .t..: ~i .)Ir. Pereol4/I\' the FOP; denied 1w him. 'file laSt person toil,',,to • 111 4( I-limner), now . sat opposite, all' ' ) ;t it i h it4 i G l r l id , f i ' l Ch l: a i s i tc a le° ll ruel t a4 l g :r i t ' t ? I :ll l i tt if d r. .l .t .ie V e7 ll.lait3 s s a rilei°l / 1 YrItlhl : r! Mover, aye more, inuclimore, I.nitl bc61,1).0 1 ! : y 1- ‘ 1 " . Pt=reeval - .tror - 1 Eldon, and th g 1 1 , •. , 0 which he, ;fie Noble Lord„ wai one , i '°- ', t t •tfl faction, not onlv of England,,blit 01E111'00 WI i red 'i t garble?, accounts of this Ono' i d o i r i et c . :_t t:: ll : o l: :: : : si t ic l l b no l ti l ) S ec i t l ia e eb d di i to e t t I , : e N ‘it r . o .. Ar,vi,,,lhai itibdiecr„t,l:ll6:tl:lolo ed into a narrative relat ni to the recen t ' so d Regent from the Princess. 'This leo' r iv or that his Royal 'Ugliness. This favou r ` i a. di grairted, and a cold answer ti . ;a'' se , ' 1 , i : f r l il ' 19 !..),i,. l 'ter,, st , .a.ing., alai the Princetiihealettit-e-r-:11:?; inen, after twice returning and refusing ta say air; thing in rel'l',' % ii ' „isar t ( t t %) l . l l ll ol l : t i e t ' eti l gt t :C fil a t t e t Tl i '' l, l : li t e e tt er i t l i g e l : e C i e r y ill l S l th t J t e (n e s ) lo : . : l : t l ' i ! e l : il it i : l : p i r i ,l e : ri a u,,B l) (. : ), L i .l 7 ,l st l . l l, lc ..ic i ii it , ie es i i rrY r,o y , i . er l4: 'Y , c ,,lo :' ) 6 l ,o ' i t , '.) l . ,) ll.d i., .t il ci ii i , l i t t) ic e e r i l l part of Lords Castlercarli Inul Eldon ;,ilio but to her eondnet i I •41ni . '"' d 4fi conduct she i s t ,; ' . " 1,•4 ' r d to - ' :subsequent year.,,.--- '' Then, (,',,,,) ' IV . ; 11 7 .) tinder what ' cireimistances t'''• : . ' I I ,I,,p= I n i ° oy " :1 P ll l. ;l e i e n t t i .l7i: t tl O f bC lB l l ) ) ll i il . ...ic ‘ : ::l;Vh:t-C:11 . 111illiel nesses ,agait or hor perjured and hV,, u }, e Ai) 4l ' admit RAI byibe Noti'le Lord, and ) I ‘ 6 ' ' 3. ) El(1011111iN Up ,iii , f ,',,i 1 ; :c,11 of evido cs: !, . tc!stirnony - that could be. lotmit to lif:' i:ess. , of W i ties.. 1 ,, 1 t was - nut thi s 1.311) : 40, in I t3t;ti laid before the Pri 3ce s a i f. * ~M,,r" ,Adatu., Mr. Garrow, ancl.rtchisiclinl ' () tud be glad to know Low tfte,!t,,, OA M 1 Ilgraph of that opinion. came be' ° '', ~, o , i.V.lit,'Lher it WaSllotOlatle pllbile, ti').,1,,, t , 's, Llwyers, .1 jo".,000 e.-.Tiitlentititl,l,iliennoilit .flsioc6,Ct)beiriti,cret , ( 1 1 i 1 ,1 : -- ; .r r tt t? to : L l i, ' i , . • z o ft. 0 ttlie;, (41 1 : 1 1, i , n , i t ( i 'l l t e l ( 6 ) -- t a . , t g li t e li 1 1 1 3 , r .5 i t t: , ;::: : . : i L. ,,;,,. - v erdict' ° .' t ., acquittal was giVen ?. From this vtoi!oi seem to shrink, 'because the. evids!t', oje I°:rgouin..7-41r. Whitbt Cad then retocji of Council of )807 ; it was sig lAA 11 : 1 4 10 ' c"gb and Lldn. o, and` doubted ale 'ljoi ..t2m4ol;i:itiion that i:lt 111)00 the 0- 14111 , 1 ,00 Yktt (Ade(' Alr. ,:Vuithread) thes e tw o m'bo . in Iso7 doubt t Ire ieu;,lity of I lle o ' r oo of 1806, now go back to. 1;24”e 5 " `, to of. 1806; as their . only gttide. /I° tbei 1)4 4 Batt or the .i\li.rutc of 1807,- th: ,l It' it .,, j' . , 1 ) acTiits the I , r in„,, s o f Av a l ei a f cv.l.;„og erminality broualit n anhat ber bY:" l ' e , 404 but e.-Keolpates her lik b ewisc ti . i.u" , cr' l,:. 61 ' guarded levity b sio.ners in' I 806 . . o' do then," 101"/,,,01' read ' - " 11 ° Lord CasJereagb t' r , fol' thean, to escape from their worjs `, Si eras a verdict of Not (Itilltv Elie '"'..,.. tl'_. ki % ‘ e B n it bof ti2 nre bt . ! t 1. 1 : it:rus't.i!ttittedir.ctet) t" 1-4 f ::: : ' ' ;' : i tt ' ' ' } i'' ' Pronounce a new verdict: of gt'''' o lici t , c' .,, IVOnt' , . i dot no il l t l i t i ,s lB : % t e.l :l‘ b. n Slt a- Princessur e etllll:actof.i t l: 1 1N: 1 1111 : i:1: 11 I :Te l l : se' t i?:s e :-.:1e1 i la;Ll Z: s t le . isi i eti . i ; lt ) :riil art ' :::;.::;' (1 .1111.. i' r l':it).; '' '' 1 1 ‘ ) clbserVe, abut the NOW , ' I I) 1 : 411111 L. i , . e 5 P i ll less, that t'...tu Princess . o f 11 '' ! i t i c -,:e:- 1 , less, some legi. adviser, or .5°19c,1 to , :f those rvall, who wee!d lie fullii i . ; tl .1 :11" sure. Jr had been so. „ SI".; ,', 1 ,-, ,'. ' 5;4 adviser in rliat Houie la The • i ii:,. . val. Alanv too 01 tits »}o , t 31) , Ie , I t n‘li' iL i l i t . : , :l , e ' r :: :. l ,l:. d l i 5 1 3 .1 1 ; i t li t i r:r uo d e cn i a , i t d: t4 v7i: tis t e i .. l, l le . s: ‘ . ; lll, l la l lii. : : ::: : (l ,e ,tl r, g y, i' : [: sr..ti,,r,teci;:kitabin 'taleih i i i s noc ri vin ',-; ,.,1 ,,' • :- , i i. . • ~ tor her other .urvi.‘, fog ilia jj" ) i''''' 1 ' j*-\,(' duubttbe. Prineez,,s 1101 her 1'::,,,,.',', Who %void() never .slirinl,i, Irvin ri i t', ', , ,:i , ;:i . ' the such of his situfrtion, or ‘ I '':; 1 4 1 ;: 0 4 such adviser, to hint who 1-13 e ci r t a 'ij iiet :' 0 1 tion him ; for hini,cie, in per'"': 1 1 °' cussd not Call himselffrlrrttire• , - dof i 1 0. " 1 Of Wales, but the:it-W. ~t no.. .f , 4 Was her Itoyml klignes at It: , vr ; 0 , . :the common, courtesy r helongio.g::eo ~tlti. she Ktempted more than liatlurigthi,7,!; more brinal reign of IleorY th r ke d tit ilO cc i, fc'irtunate Anti itullen,' 8 v 11° : 5 0 3i , r ,i'''''') inoocent emproved to be ru— , id, A l O conchided a - speach- of great lonli t itliel ,.,,' Amendment for the product -On' jectO ' Is 5g : . --': ccntly made by the indivith.' Privy Council,. '• . . . . .. . I~