The Sun. — London, England, 1813-05-14 00:00:00

fent, acting in the name and on behalf of his Ma levy, do:that for liar, *hid' had his : reasOrt been Snared, he would .not have done himself?. After tome fin'ther observitilous On the difficulty, if not the ImpOssibility,,, of getting a sure hold on the 10y:thy of the Catholics,:and on ilte ease with which they could desPise the obligation of an oath • in stippOr.t of., which 'be anotedD?, Milner, Pr. Laming,, anti' Thomas ,:Aegainas, who • ted that oaths, in many cases, were . not binding; he noticed' theinannefiiii which the Pope had dis , • solvcd the treaty coacb.tdeirbetween the Emperor of Germany and his It ingarima subjects, - in 1712, by rcleasl ui., one of the parties from the necessity of Observing" the oaths taken. lie then conJ mented the..initrobability pi' the - arrangement no* proposed :proving satisfitctory to the Catho lics; us in a paperreeeived in town that day, it ' appeared that Dr. Troy, had. primonneed,that which h a d Leen, called for instead of the. Veto, to be worse than the Veto itself . ; and ccnicluded a boll g and aninutted Speeeli; woiiing as an amendment, that instead of, " now " the- Bill should he'read a seCond time kin " that day three' months." r ' Mr.C. Gaitti'T. Conceived that in `approaching this great subject they ought to approach it with u feeling of anxious : desire to do that which was for thecnmmon good, and exert themselves to find means for Temoving those obitaeles,, which might stand ii\ their Way rather than seek reasonsior op - posing the Ineatittre:hOore the Ilouse..; That suite of ihings, which divided those who ought to be closely united., he Shinild have expected, would ra- . then have been palliated as an evil to be endured:, which could not be avoided, than maintained and hr Id up as a positive blessing. Was in itself a de'.iation 'from. Conititattional priaciple,'and (trust therefore be defended on'its own ground. As An . evil, ji,might, be preferred to a greater, bUt lie had not expected it would be panegyrised its one of thoSe privileges of which Englishmen had rea son to he 'proud, and defended in the Same tone which might properly be taken by an'adveteate, when speaking for the Bill of Rights and Magna Charter. 'file present. System made : a .broad Unction hetween ,those who Ought tO'forth but one people ; it ,erected a dkunion'of interests, which it ought to be the object of :t wise Govern ment to avoid and it Must neeessurily'elreek' the progress of moral improveaterit. It eadsetl' a feel big of depression, which Was not now known for the first tittle, Ina' which had been lou . ex perienced by the : TO:ill people. It was natural.that the wars which lael so long distracted - the two countries, sho'uld have lefia feeling of alientt-' tin a on the part of Ireland, almost amounting to animosity, 'from the period' of the 'Revolution.— Nt'a glad the atteation of Parliament Was turned to the subject at latit. He hoped it"-ivas not tool:Ate elfPctitally tit remove all existing dif ferences. He regretted that the same degree iif attention had not beet paid to it before. How could,they hope to fiteilittite moral improvement, tvltilts.the) left rifneour. glowing in the hearts' of the. people ? England had proceeded in a Career varied, yet brilliant, while the - course:of Ireland was, only spai iced by monotonous:oppressions, 'or Ivorritd by persecutions, The reign of Eli-z.atbeth gave us glory—the Restoration was to its a day of joy. The Revolution follotved, to Which we oWed our liberty : the SticeessfitV reign of Queen Anne, ' the treeSsion of the 11runswiCk Family' to the throne, the war of 1715, 411 tended o exalt the glory of 'Englind, while Ireland remitted in a state of degradation. They were not admitted to ° tin; Constittitioa. They hearil of'trial by jury,' bet they Were exchtded'front being; grand jurors. They beard 9e au elective franchise, but when • they tried to avail theinselves of it, they were • thwarted by the rules laid down by that 1-. louse. If thiS Was a system. it was one . east to a broken nuoull of the Constitution. TheHOn. Gentlentan their proceeded Veil i Sllo . l'd to review the ancient 's•itectisations whicit Ir.t l this ttight . bei:UreviVed by the; last speaker. The :Learned Gentlenian bad- Citthalics'did not keep . their oaths; yet • their oat.4s were received Courts rof'Lawi:as eiptal to those of Protestants, - It was fatthertaid • they, did n9t observe treaties' ; yet the treaty; of AVetitpluittia ritrordeo - ata, : .'example of thet • lte by Protestants, evert after the; disc' It:ttiSl;ietion of .the Ptitie had bee. ll exP"'ed. With re3pet to ihp Bill . , he was not so'well read on thodagicat subjects as ti sappose hintself-ea , frible of adding to thelitfornattiott of the House. t seeiaed to hini to Oynceell on the initiciple that the "tairt it titian was stlfe so , long as the civil and eeelesia , A ascendancy of Protestantism Was 'se cored. Ale denied the existence- orany danger fro% the..power Of the'Pope. Such ,auth - oiirY ~could have no influence oier the atrength olthe • ila ti a a—a peasantry, sensible: at the blessings ,they enjoyed. As-,the reign:of. . the present Mo narch commeneed.witly opening the Constitution to the Catholics, they &mid not,' in bit mselan ,choly situation, erect - a prouder : monument to his me fa tlom t.o enmplete,in the same ,reign that which had,beenlio'glarionsly heguit. - Tirty Irish Cut Indies were not long since officers inahe Alts-' trivia service, ; -and, he 'pot it to:the - House if we could spar theire *men. Was 'it 'not' lamentable and disgriteeful to theeountry, that its children could nut achieve high rank,- but as exiles ;- that they Hulse' fight the battles of Other -Lando, and thought they, might die. heroes, that they could not die patriots ? On thesirconsideradOns he •called on the house to perform theitypitrt'of the gOod work, and then indeed they might boast of the stability and excellence of the doustitution. Sir F eooD warmly supported :the All,' and entered into arguments at some length, in order to Prove that it was-consistent with-sound policy amt . wfsdoin that it should pass into a law. die rebtatted Sev'eral of the pogitions down by and expressed his surprise that, after emtir,wi l ig as CathOilie for sixteen ve:irs, the : lino. (Lindeman should.he sci severe , aprtinst a body Of troi . aiteang whora'he had as as snecimett ' • ") ) ...5;,F,E.Ep.A01.14 though aware that the Cantalittee Wa4 the ie.pt oper p..tet. WSCUSISW i of thisitnetture, trusted the II rise • hini in biasing' tits csliitoir,n On ) the gent:3.4 scow"; sit (! rendeneY taf the:3AL 1h: would east t ill p[al is tentran to•theliill;avithont. reference-to the clauses of the• Right Hon, _Gentleman (Mr, Cam icing). In hi,4 opinion theitight Hon,Gentletnat\. (Mr. Grattan)• had taken a discreecand sop iitkviey of the ineasure lee had to peopbse.. • At fIYSI the . Right Hon. Gentleman hati,seemed disposed to proceed liy a much more general repeal than lie bad now followed,out in his. Bill. In, departing from this course he had strewn his, usual, ability, for it' he had pursued his other plan. be (Lorii . C.) could not have consented to revoke all. the Acts of Parliainent implicated, which could not have been done without agitating the mind of, the country. / wai, thefefore that he,so much approved.of the wiser-course taken by, the Right _Hon. Gentleman, to see what objects the Catholics had in view; and what could be granted consistent with the fit se- . cfirities for Church and,State, He agreed that we Ought to give all' we could, and ask no securities but such as the Catholics would notoriously grant. It mustbe• Observed, that by admitting. time Catho lics f.to the . Legislature (one of the greatest , ad, . vantages - of this measure) -they not only admi t t o a te,l 'them to their .contmon rights, but also power in the Protestant Church, in so far as the. Church was inseparably connected with the State. In return for this , we ought to be permitted as great a privilege in regard_to their foreign hierar chy, anti as a cournerpoise:for the authority thus given, and a security against encroachment. For this purpose the Right 'Hon, Gentleman had de vised the ge nkral security of oaths, He felt, no distrust of the oath of a Catholic, hut on the con trary thought it entitled to the . highest confi dence, since itwas their regard to its. sanctity alone which impeded their progress to .political power. But he' objected to this species of security, not only as applied to Catholics, hat to Protestents. 'Po meet all dangers. ,by barriers of oaths, shewed' great poverty of legislation, and want of knowledge of human nature. It was only by • estimating indl acting upon the prejudices of mankiud, they . could be- enabled to draw out a - desirable re sult, He wads, hostile to oaths, generally as a se curity, and mote especially in a political Inea • sure. where separate interests .were concerned, — With respect to the oaths, themselves, 'he found no fault with.them : set far as they could he .rens dered binding and conclusive, the Right Hen, Gentleman: bad ,; succeeded with those lie, he'd ; framed ; but he opposed, himself to the,generak principle of placing 'all their reliance in any case on' oaths at all. Upon another point, he begged leave to suggest a doubt as to the propriety of the measure, and to inquire whether the Right . lion, Gentleman had not , here gone a little beyond the bounds, of prudence, Ile alluded to the repeal generally ofancient oath 4 and Jests. If Dissen ters were excluded: by,thcexistence of these,AetS, • nothing could justify their ,continuance; , but as they 'were admitted , by an annual Bill of in deinnificatiOn, -he thought the seine. course might be adOpted . towards . lie This would inure, worthy of the Right ,Ho-: nourable Gentleman's prudence, than by a revo ' 'cation of the test laws to agitate the public mind. With .respect to the general. power of the Papal. See ; produced by ,causes not appareut, be could entirely concede to the principle of a Right Hen. Gentleman '(Mr. Cenninu) in the clause be had produced; and which might be takett ,as part of the Bill. Though he differed from the Right Ho tnntrahle, Gentleman on some pthiCular. points that .respected the,foreign relations of the Cacho-, lics, yet he thought that they 'must, come to an understanding on that subject. • On the subject of , the disposal of.hishopries in the Roman Catholic Church in this eountry, it was not "his intention to claim on the part . of ,the Crown any direct no-' minatiorts. His Views on that subject included not merely the appoiamcnt Of but a distinct temporal interest which4m Cat Folic Clergy could not fail to have with,the See of Rome, and which it , was necessary to counterbalance. 'The means by wh this , was.to be effected would be, by butane lag their interests in the sovereignty of the kingdOM egaitsis, that- which.they had with the See of Rome r ; 9h the subject of the appointment of Copunis. 'stoners to approve of ,the election of Homan. Ca.- , AtiOlie Bishops, as op•dered by one of the clauses -proposed ..by the Right; Hon. GentleMati,, he thought tttt. the' .Right Honourable Gentleman could not) but feel unwilling to impose' upon Ahese person the 'exereiSeof'fituctions, the dis charge of which. could not :in ruby cases, be otherwise.than most, ungrateful and unpleasant..-- -By the'clattse of the Right Bon. Gentleman, theSe Commissioners, were. Oiled Upon to exercise their authority in approving or dislipproving of persons :elected as .Bishops.. n . these cases , in which the :•. , Commissioners would be calk upon in ciniScienee ..-to disapprove Of the persons, , they Were Obliged to intlict upon him the, disability exercising - the episcopal duties, and, of course, Would either ba nish him from. thelingdom, or deprive him of the means:of subsistence, The, effect -,would 'necessarily be, that the ex creiscof the duties of Commissioners, would fall into disuse, from the unpleasant nataire• of their functions, and these necessary antics would not be executed hat in cases of gleritx nO toriety.- lie had, not. made these 'statements with the intention of combating - the principle upori which the )tight Hon.'Gentleman had proceeded; it was the mode and not the - priuciple to which he objected. His objeesion to the mode consisted cimicity in this ; that he conceived. that it would he better gone by the known laws of the Constitu tion than by the means suggested by the Right Hon, Gentleman, The clause propoSed by' the Right lion. tientleinan gave so great a discretion to a power not known to' the Constitution ; and went to give a power to persons, Whick, if they were disposed to abuse, . might do it in such way as to be dangerous to Ale' country. Adverting to the second clause proposed 'by the Right Hon. Gentleman, he. doubted whether be' perfectly understood his view,„„ Ile conceived it to , be framed with air view of ; protecting the State against, any acts whicli,Might mix temporal with .spiritual power. lie thought that the : -clause was deficient in that it did-not _profess to submit the instrument itself, ,which ought to be examined, but therely, ordered that a copy of the instrument shoidd be submitted to the inspection of the State,. if the: catholic% w ished ti.i.inspire confidence in the Protestai;ts', it did not, behove: Ahem' to give imperfect security when it was in their poster to t.ois I )c,N Iha. •‘;)» TIJONIAS WOOD, of 'No. Strand; and . I , llblisCr CU, NOA ii 2, Strand, ihtere ildrarlisementY, Orden' . . . •• • Tat which was compute.*With .respect to the temper (I C the ( great body of 'Vr.k) - teSeant.i, did believe - that there was an andient refmgnaned to the principle in the niajor part 6t . nation , but chiefly in the - lower chtsset ; vet, even under all the disadvantages Of the,Cathnlic Loaf in lire= land,; . tbe prin . cijile of emancipation had `rapidly gained ground; and fheie teas ati:auxiotiS desire to find the means .of solving the diffichlty'hi a way )% - iicti Should be conSistent with the thireq.o 4 : tbe Stuie ; and he 'ditlin his conscience - believe, that the prinalple which actuated the Hot - ISe in that de bate would scion beeotne'•unlversah • . . A Mgmtta, whose panic we could tat-4 spoke a few words ,in 50 low a iOne as not' tO':he audible in the' gallery. wouldnOt presume to say that ite tWertood all the Opinionstf the Noble Lout' (Castlereagh). It would however -he improper (according to the opinion. of the'Noble Lord) for. hitr't to bring' forward proposdi for alteration . in the Bill upon the table. All that could be done was, to`erinic forward to those concitizitory area surer ,Proposed by the Noble .Lora. Having said thus nwehdie 'thought it was nOt. - necessary for .hint to saranother wOrd.—(Hear, hear'!) Sir J. HiPrismti• then rose' amidst loud cries of gur.!...tion; question- 7 -mA the lion. Baronet; al though' very perseVeringt, was thwarted in his en ,dustvours to obtain a hearing. • Mr. li.vnutt then rose, but. his 'efforts to-be heard were likewise fruitle3s. A motion for adjournment was then proposed. 1.40r4 CAVI;LEREAGII said, that the motion ,for adjournment had been made merely for the pur pose of procuring- a hearing for those who were disposed to speak. That motion may be with. drawn with the same facility with which it W:f:4 made. Mr. BATHUiST said, that iu rising lie bad no other intention than to withdraw the motion. Mr. livnEn then rose, and after considerable, difficulty obtained a hearing. if it were the wish ot those who brought forward the measure that it should pass, in sued a way as to give general sa tisfaction, would it, he would ask, at all contri tribute to that desirable end, that. those persons who did not entertain the same sentiments with the friends of the Bill, could not obtain a patient hearing Ile must remind the House of the situa tion in which they stood with respect to the The Bill hack how) introduced upon the ground that security would be given. It went to the remo=al of all disqualifications, but it proposed no new se curity. The oath now proposed was nothing more than a combination of the t'wo.oaths that were before in (.!istence that appointed in 1792. 'for English Catholics, and the oath. of 1793 for , Irish Catholics. it was important, to*Consider as little the nature of the clauses proposed by . the Right Hon. Gentleman below him (Mr. Canning-) For his own pita,. he must say, ti he would 'pre fer incurring the. dangers ,of the foreign influ ence- of the Pope, in the way in which that in fluence could he now exerted, to the admission of those clauses.—He could see nothing more iiiii chievous than such a commiSssion as that which his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Canning) proposed a commission, it was• true, to be appointed by the Crown, but neittier . removable by the Crown nor responsible for its conduct.--(Mar , hear .)---Even if the commission were to Consist of Prkestants, he would hae nearly the *One objection- to it. No sufficient securities had been yet proposed, or seemed likely to be devised, after the greatibili ties that had been so long employed ineffectually fOr the purpose of diScoverinethem. .said, that notwithtranding the im patience of the House at that late hour, he trusted that; considering the situation which he had the honour to hold, he should be indulged for a few minutes, while he stated his sentiments upon' this most importaAt question. i e ~ bould, fesscd, be very . unwilling tO let this Bill pass •the Second reading ,without entering .his` . , protest against it: lie protested against the principle at this Bill, hecanse it conferred on those who ad 'minted an, external jurisdiction; the tl i ght 'of legis lating Qll all Matters . conneetekWith the: Church of ;England; he, protested againSt'this Bite, he cans: it was not confOrmable to the resolution of the Rouse, on 7,s t ;lllch it prc,lescd to be fOunded ; that resolution did certainly adopt the, principle of ColleCSsioli to the Catholics but it was conces - don connected WAIL the !strongest and_ most, dis iinet securities for the Establidied Church. He wished to ask, Where Were these securities ? The House, he should:think, Would not :he satisfied with the promise of At'lkieniherl however respec table, that some clauses, which were printed, ,Shoul,d.be. hereafter added in: the Bill. 'Upon a question of such viral importance,lhe'securities • • ought to .accompany the Bill , OotOf 'the great ditlicultiei Which appeared . to 'stand in tire, way of proposed concession was'tht:. state of the population of lf - the',Prti-' testants exceeded the arria'n Catholics in man ber--4 the popnlatimi of the two eotn'itries 'Were mixed up, together, lie',Sh9nld haVemireli les•s ob jection.. But it ,was impossible to IoOK at the situation of' frelami, Where the RoMan so, greatly ,preponderated in ninbef, without teeling alarmed:. at•the 'onsetitiences of quell' utili mitesl concession. his Noble Friend had talked . • Of providing for the, clergy' of the ltoniarr Catholic • Church ; but, if they.'were. maintainedat the . eit- Tenet: of the State, how conld the Protesiant he. called the Estahlished . fteligiOV? Thebnly.diffe renee between the two" religions in Ireland - Would then bi::;,:.that a Itotßan Catholi . c l could not be Lord Lieutenant. It should be' recollected, that Ireland had a distinct hierarchy, that she had the same panther of Bishops that 'there 'Were: in thii country, and-that/she had 2000 Clergy; now, •if by this . Bill the two religions were equalized 7in lrelawd, %l ad(' noe,Pailiament-SoOn:be called to put 'the professors of both the same toting When Parliament had deelared,'that there was no . reason why one religion ishonlci have'any • prefe. roce over the other,: was it to bh , supposed that the'COolic, of Ireland w o uld consent willingly to Maintain the Clergy of a religion not professed by more than one-fifth. of the inhabitants of that, icountry l 'He would'not detain the House much longer at tins late hour, hit Was anxious to yin . dicate himself frOttithe charge .of inconsistency, ' rqr by WILLIAM ARNIT6Eit- smtlips,-i;outti motton-trret. or the Paper, Lefters for the Editor, &c. (post paid),, Lutist be atidiessed. : • ';" • . . tvliich bad been preferred by a Ibli , rlit II -% G'"" Sielitim (ik.rr. ..ttining) against those o f t !, t ' whbote -- this Dill, because, though they din. proved att:iple of this measure, they hail yetlowlf`l the proposition of_the I-Ioti: Ilarouct 'Oir Ji iiir P6IeY). it as w tri:iii th a t last Suasio n ht ni)", p u tl r ixt . ' c i a b: i, - i i n u t o , ' ) ii ; on t 1 I t: , f . ,..q - the ile st li k, i l f .. i t l ii t e l t i l if: 3. ,. s ( , 4 e o l , ll i i : t r i , . C die - 11011 Se shoithf res i s t the. :litirits . of the '.. t c l:-.l n i c i t ts s s ,,' i o o n r . r,rhictit:ol4.thititqs:io.ar,tiufli:tre(ith.e Peruoe;io,:,, When, therefore, lie, and those who, tioil.:. with him, were driveir• {torn their -stcunglt""f' there was • no - incons i stenc y ill Aril' the next strongest that' offered., Though iIJ) might have preforted resistance to. in e'; YPt" 'they might prefer , inquiry. to rooccs''',' , 4 H Ile, was thel- more inclined to " obiat c°, lira 1 Bill, beeause; even if it were .passed, its'e .s '' t . . i ;object would'not be•obtained, for Irian, would 'still ;main behind. 'fliers witb' 114)111 ,, said in.this Bill about the liws ill csi° dfice Ll e i. speeting,i hequestS of ftoniait •Catholics for t I , r l schools and plate's 'of trashi y nothing ilbu ut i t s d d education of the Catholics. It Was then avortioi represent this Bill as -colcalatect to ell'oct 3. ,. t , attjustinent, bccause titere;wer t raany 1 ,01 : i i .,„ ing upon our 'Statute Books, which ilo tii ..„ pealed if this Bill.shoul i pass. Air. rEs".c ' 'i elude I with- statintr i al i 1 I nor t" sl9 ' 14; MN ;7011 l • , , •• b u r timt it., . ,_ . on t g o e ( r . upon the House at thaCtirad, j•I ta/e thel!u -I, at some future stzigv of the I ' l ' at opportunity of s"tin" le i s timenti OR large. b' seli ipritAlla':: Mr. WILBERrCIRCE did not . clearly oak- . t .f he i vieivs of the Noble Lord (Caitl'i"ltb)it' Uri;,.l 1 . e b e meant .to propose any aitiondmeor" --1110Y41.' b .an itidueetnent:to ni.itty. to vote for,t k 51° reacting. - . •ettlY •La .1 r , r; tO give his_assistanee, as Aft iliii i ' Vi'lli"i; ' l b co . Pc'°l7GlF:etunr:hte.et);:ilas.l7-:::-RI:REeiGmaieltu-Ites:ru:iir;:i t i cti ;lt : 1:1 : 13311;J:1)°1it-i't '1: '1 ilro ... %_vngd in the aids of" 'Question!" nst of e Mi % CAktititd -rose .ilierety for the r l i r r'nor xpressing the-sinctere disposition wb bil I : ',f lola' . the Noble Lord (Castlereagh) eutertlijoelit (gr.. i t;h _l i t a g rn a lin l g te ) ly ‘ i v n a g t; l r ia e n ai t i t ir; 4 to . etith:ernif:sute, 14 4 t he N ouse, to compare - his ideaS kvith Otrl ' °ustiet ' ' f ili tll)lti utile Lcird:utkci' to adopt !those atir,k'l i bc e?nsideratintt,"•shottict .uppear' hot. Lr,,,fuf Veto }xe entertained doubts. If :illy prov''llo t d, the Roman Catholic' Clergy %vas f't b e 144 ' that pinposal shOiAd cope front t he Croclij".g Qi The House then' divided on 'site 1.1 te 9 " - P the Bill. I . J ir or tt... ••••. • • • . . .... • , 2 , , Against ..... Majority ............. • J'f T T , RE KI NG et: . • , r( .i 11 . 1.1; itsr t ah i .lc bi wt :e ,. o fig r c g i :e t 7 Dartiel liarv tlt ey, b ► y PI oi,d 3csr a4 oNo l l i ° : 1 O view ref fP offence of bon buting to him' and his lql3.4llerg 70'1°1' .usal.i Mr. H. was placarded. , , Be a n r o be ituprigooed in to.ororce months,ch ~tor three . to give secutriiet); eyears, ach. II '1)1.2001. and two surF his -propert from his . .., for . after ni • Ba n vas -- -- himY ttoufilloSandtli' with . t h e intent of Ilive,',o. tor — t io' e i ; lll . (l-t o l r lg e t;s'i t ni t i T ' AlllY : l j :°l.l'r a t : i lluS°l t t dt i l llK' g i:tuat ,o nva n liil fl ug.: l 3 ..e h e r—ulGti t e li : e u s t dEfl ' ivi d ta t l'4'l l 4ls t w: I..l o :llllfit s i'cli h rtdi t er i .t :: :: : :::l l lsl;ls. : srlll: i Ycl t l.9 l ::: : il° l ll4ll's' e lliQll:;:jl ' l )9L l :tt i lict i :l t ' l lri : slv i lirir.'cilibil''''' l :ll l 4l l lll:l 4 l::' d;---d swindlibg roeil l ,q. ,ocVi' r P t o .reundiytaapnaapltoegayretchl that should * 0 t ti ► e 1 , 1 . 11 i (I a :17 ,1 ' 0 : : 11 ° j ::. indi ettuent for Jibe Wog 50,.,,01,ii1i, -ni lamented e- ° l n k: e ti tipg I°' abide any' title' ''''ltt ill ( table I Mr. Ju§t'il): '! . il l, o . cati on .- c' . : ~0 joie' i ice _Ro--, obsei ~' . ~,_ ~ A 6 d," that the svortis which toot bo i t b ' e .lo": t,i"u defendant he had thous, 041 !got no '11 .: ( " "-% iu ,pronoonad.r .., 'Ol O i % ) :11.1'41Y Ge,titientan—till 11: had soe ll tll O OO , 1 ;f might . be gives., Tile 6 1 11 for t.i : l if le_tlifeht, ' be had 110 t S qr.'s Cd t 11 .';Ii 3t!' A :any rnv tientlemaii to use such, eipression''toice Ir.ti,; for his s, . a fill° empter. )ell,ad ;101db.be:artelreuvrt'ictillY°13'' ImoiPurtii:onm eat .-lo the Niugss, 130;4' d 4c 6 ') to the King of iliv-ioui aire ti ' tui , 0 good behuvi9ur, himself io iC ~ **sureties - , .in Ow 01: each. • , .40 ' ti .' ~ loti , rP , ' 1 hiC-,.A,i".:'", 8, Charipg.. cross, .Lc't w 0 00' e.,:' I to , Puy probaLle that ...before the wit'll'ilitOrijrt Pu.TuVsday next, the Cuatiat:oo 14',Iii3O;°olil', 'Poell of every Ticket in their yo'"', s c,i'lli i '', o'' rate,' those who w i s h . to 4) u r .Cll ~6 e S Pi s i 0 i: i ' t : 0 ,0 I"' it, as the Soating.Caiiitali Inlty W ll it" .0 11 3..20)0(1010 PriZe must aCCOIL/i4I) ) 1,1:111Ce0i. Inll,i::::ait'il:iiitiautbr;Viiie:u.::e‘::%:.lell'illSti. 21.:11::::11;:e1:1::1111',1:;141-;::. ....,-: 1/°' ,71, 1 : Shares'soia 1 c ' ' , ...tit ed'PP J 'Ho .*, .piti, ata Sou fin __,---- iro, .......—.........----, , co ~,o, 0 0 Tueadai-la4, the ItiAesl.l:l‘tV"'illil:ltft 131°.1>L711# Chapel, Ciairch-streetc Bethaal-greett-Pr? illluotut, of Qaeen-stieet", t iii i i a l p i s ' id . °-•_._:,-.-- ; h : t'' ../ .---- ..• , ~,,,, v • DIEM Oc‘ r f On Monday lid, ia GroVe-alece gala, ► ii , sisd William Ncww" 4•;s Of Co;a1a1.1, 031)1°'" of her age. ' I. ---------'-----iv. , KS V E,STOAV.- 'il, Jo' 10(0 90110, P• Old At oil, 0 , 1 r Exchequa Pitt I , 4s, do. pr. i, 4, luipqri4l 3 per v P Pa° A ttu, 40,0 c.o. fa ot 4 ' PRICE. OF STO Bank Stnelt, Navy 5 per Cent. 884 88 1 Irish 5 per Cent. 4 per Cent 47414 3 per C'eut. Re 4 13 00 .„ 3 per Cent. Gans. 59* 59 w Bank L, Anu. 14f tl-16t s India Stock, 1119 It1,11_: WATER AI COSPO N w iou -"mini, 49 :mina atter 2. NIT' tell hay Lirg, C the i Th