The Sun. — London, England, 1807-06-04 00:00:00

- LAW REPOR7. COURT OF CHANCERY, fuNE 3. ATTOR:CEV GENERAL og - cilia NEWCOMBE, VULLAEVy • AND OTPIERS. In this case, which excited very great , public . 'Wrest, as well as uncommon anxiety in the Parties, the ArroteNtY GENERAL, on theinformation-of the Rev. Richard Lendon,, and - several of the parishion • ers or the parisb'of St.. James, ClerkenWell e was Mintiff, and the Churchwardens, Rich Newcombe, Jeßtillard; the Rey. Hen. Foster, and other inhabit ' iints -of the said parish, were Defendants, - The mai- . ter iteissue has 'been sitrenuously litigated for near three years, in this and the Spiritual Court; the ob- Je t!A:being to try - the validity of an eleaion in that paris!i, had in the year 1804, between the two cler= . gy me a abovenarned, for the vicarage ofClerkenWell. Mr. Foster was returned by--the Church Wardens the successful candidate, and the information and bill in this case were filed to try the validity of that elec tion, and praying an 'lnjunetion against the Rishdp of London, to restrain him from eraming a licence to Mr. Foster for officiating as the Vicar, .purSuanno Such eleoion. The modes ainvestigating this elec tion were very unusual , as suggested by the bill ; they Were to go before the Master to examine the validity of all the votes,•or to try , by a Jury each vote.sepa rately ; which must have been attended with infinite expense, delayeand inconvenience to the parties. • It appeared; that at the dissolution of monas teries, .the property in dispute came into the hands of the Crown ; and on the-2d of June:; 1651 i, a deed of ptirchae was obtained by the parishioners, and • inhabitants of the parish, in. trust, to five several trustees named therein, and to their - heirs for ever, who were at all times to - eleta a Vicar upon every vacancy, with a sum/of 41. 18. s. 6d. yearly; as a sti pend for the Curate. It happened that in the year -1770, in the case of the Rev. Mr. Sellon,a similar case to the present had been agitated between the pai'ishioners of the same parish, and . a Decree pro,. uounced by the Cdurt of Exchequer in favour of the Plaintiffs, which directly applied to the present case; as contended for by the Plaintiffs' •Connsel.-- The Churchwardens were' charged with pirtiality and corruption in the Election, and much turned -on the true meaning of the words " inhabitants" and parishioners," which, tOe CHANCELLOR observed, would, to an ing idotis mind, admit fifty diderent constructions ; but the word " paying," not hereto-. fore much disphted ainong LaWyers; became here cu riously interesting. Mr. Rion ARDS, for t hePiaintitis, contendin;., that paying did mean having paid.. The CHANCELLOR observed, that that might beta Welat conStruction of the term, while MreßtexAans con« tended, that, like the casein certain Boroughs paying scot t and lots, to entitle a voter, he must have been six previous months a resident, and have aaually paid ; it did here mean, having paid the Church and Poor's rates, so thatit did admit that 'construction in Eng lish_ as well as Welch, and in Latin likewise. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY, for the Defendants,.on the contrary, forcibly argued, that the term " paying" only signified here a liability to pay, or to being as sessed ; and humouronsly . reftited Mt. RICHAHDS'S construetion of the term, by stating, that if the term " paying" could mean " havi% , g, paid," the CHAN= - CELLOR must prepare his mind, if he could, to,con •sider hint (Sir Ssmuitt.), then in the midst of his. argument, 'as not• at all speaking, but as having al ready. spoken ; a circumstance, he thought, which • it would require Muth ingenuity in any counsel to.• persuade his Lordship - of. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY, followed by tour other Counsel, two of whom sub stituted his argument for theirs,to save the time of the Court, congratulated the parishioners of Clerken- , well upon the near approach, he hoped, of the final termination Of a long; vindiat i ve, and litigious con test. carried on under the semblance or eolourof.re ligion, like other cases of the kind, upon their lips, without the slightest the;:fure of it in their hearts ; he added, that "no proof of partiality or-corruption what - so,Ner appeared against the Churchwardens in the eleetion or return ; and that even if there had, t C9lrt had no jurisdiction over that question, as It could not act , as tt 'Committee of' the House- of Commons; that this was not /1 case of a charity or donati{kii, tareet . private 'purchase, •t: - ':to the stipend ; and that the election was condueted not only with the utmost fairness, but with unusual caution; that the Decree of the Court of Ekehernier was unintelli- • and should not he deiried a precedent ; that the Defendauts should Have their costs ; and that, if any ground had existed-for the - Plaintiff's to come to this Court, under the Deed of Purchase,• or the trusts thereof, such ground had been colupletely waived by theMselves, previuns to the election, by. certain reso lutions regulating thciele,ttion, passed at a Vestry, composed of • above todo persons, and which both candidates unanitnottsly sent 'wand to every pa rishioner, without a single individual finding fault with, Or obje.eting to any ono ofthetii. The, CHANCELLOR being of this opinion, dismiss; - ed the Information with costs. COURT OF KING' BENCH, luriz 3. 1101.YtiEAU PACKETS. THE KING U. JONES, COLLINS, AND OTHERS. This was a reserved case upon an appeal against the Order of the Court oi Session of W.des,-assessing certain Poor-rafts to the Defendants, as inhabitants of the parish of nulybead, in the 'lsland of Anglesea. Mr. 1-161-aoyl) . , to support of the Order,proteed ed to state, that the Defendants were . the Captairis'of the Packets which carry the mail between Dublin and Holyhead, and were 'assessed to 'pay Certain Poor's rates upon persoml property' producible within . :the said parish. The main questiOn was, whether the: ships were of -that description of local and iisible Vroperty within the. pariSh,l as carne within the theati in,g of tile Statuteof the.43d of Elizabeth ? He, there - fore, meant to contend the point - upon the principles 'of the c<e e of the King v.:White.. . . Lord -. E N -. Er observed, that there bad . e . been midi extraneous and coiLiteral matter intro duced,:ifito this Case;'such as these captains Meeting with.bad \veather at sea, the - wind at such a point, and their being obliged to turn back ; of some of them going out of their track to Parkgate; in Order' to take up some great personage or another; of their going to take Mr. Lem, Secretary to the Post Of e . . . tee, and !W ay °trier circUMstantes wholly. irrele _ OM to the question, before the Court. ' His Lord ship wished the argument to be confined - solely to the qtiestion before them'; _and, as the case of- the King v. White Was .relied Upon in support of the Order. of Sessions, he wished to hear the other side aS to that point. Mr..PAattE, on' the other side; contended, that from,a recent case of the King v. Collisson; although the Court did not come to any final decision, they seeinkt to throw out some observations Which went to sh,ike the case of the King v. 'White in a con siderable degree. In the present case 'dr De, fendarits entirely considered the Post Office as• their master, they being bound to sail at their express - desire for a stipulated Salary ; and as the Principle was adtnitted, .that all salary for persqiiel labour is not rateable, so in this case the party were - not rate able. The way in Which any profit arose from these Packet-boats ;.vas from a there casual adven .., . tare, in carrying \ passengers froth Dublin to Holy head and back, whiCh i 'the 'Government 'mightre Strain at any time, by suspending or disniissing,su c h Commander froth their service. With eespecl to the Register Ad, it did not it - fe& this case, as none but tracking Vessels cane under the meaning of that Act, all 4ng's Ships, and Vessels employed in the,King's 4erviee, being exempt. - Mr. ABBoT, on the same side, contended, upon . general principleS, that Ships were not rateable, as they certainly, were not peritimetitly Visible Within . the parish, and as it was alone by 'voyages on the ' ocean that they became. produttive, !or its long as they remained,in - port they must be unproductive ; and being toneh oftener absent from port than in'. Oa, they were not that description'of property which - could he considered local and visible property, rate ' able in certain proportions. It also beingslear that all Vessels belonging to the Crown are not- rateable, ; 'and . these Ships inquestion being free froM all bar beur dtities, all' port duties, fight-hOuse; &c; for ,l whiCh exemption the Post Office alloWs a certain sti pulatea salary ; and, therefore, under all these' cir cninstantes—first, that Ships are not property rate ablesecondly, from the particular service in which they are employed for the public benefit, he sub mitted they were not lotal and visible property, such as WaS subject to pOor's rates. -' ' • - • Lord ELLtigliollOUGH, in giving - judgment, ob served,"that he could not see any thslinetion between'' this case mid flit ce,e of 'the . King v. White : the question being whether the Defendants are inhabi— 'tautseof the parish . in question --and whether the se vessels are-local and visible rateable prepertywithin the meaning of the Act ? The pointofregiStration ,was entirely out of the case. - It is evident it was local and 'visible property, within the parish, .fora great • part of the year. . The party here makes .hisecon trael with his passengers at Holyhead ; he- is -paid at Holyhead by the passengers Coming from Dub . lin ; it is therefore a personal,prtiperty; producible Within the pariSh e and therefore rateable under the Statute of Elizabeth. The rest of the Court concurring in opinion with his Lordship, the Rule for setting aside the'rate was discharged, and the Order of & v isions affirmed. ne GOES. THE LUNG V. SARAH SEAL. This was a conditional Rule, on behalf . of the Defendant, to qua s h a conviCtion for. keeping a • Little-Go, or Private'Lottery, contrary to the Act. MAit HYATT, in support of the Rule, objected to' Me conviction upon these Bounds ; first, the conviction did not set out the names of the,informer, and‘of the person -. apprehending the' offender, ac cording to the - ACt, ,so that the party could not know to whom the. penalty was to be paid, in order to 'her enlargement; secondly, the copviCtion did not set out that the Magistrate before whom it took place was' the Magistrate belonging, to that• parti cular Police-OtliCe, ; thirdly, ,that the , Statute re quired that the person againA whorn the i . pformano n was granted, should be hnutedlately- taken into cus tody ; when, in the present case, sne"Was not appre-. headed. utitil three w)eeks after; and, Estly, that .it did not appear that any Little-Go or private Lottery • was discovered. The COll/MON SElOZANT,irl'support of the con viction, stated that, he had only received his brief as lie lett home for c6urt, this, morning, and was not prepared to argue the points as he could wish, he therefore. requested the induigende of the Court for luture play ; Which was accurdingly'granted. THE KING 'THE COMA ISSIONSH; OF SEWERS FOR THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET. This came on upon special argnment before the Court, upon a return to a Mandamus directing the said Commissioners to 'appoint a tieW rate for the support and repairs of certain parts of the sea wall, in that County. Instead of obeying the Mandamus, the CoMmisioners made .a return to the Writ; that they could . not comply. In ConsequenceOlsome necessary, documents being wanted today before the Court, the'special argument was .PcistpOned to a fu ture day. r . - At -one o'clock Lord ELLENBbROtJOsT sat at nisi PriUs, when the following, among other Ca 146.43,. was disposed Of : • WILLIAM WILLIAMS 11. MARY HARRIOTT, WIDOW. This was an action upon a Bill of Exchange of 1771. and for work and labour amounting to 1471. The Plaintiff was a carpenter formerly residing in ' tathboneplace, and the Defendant a widow, keep ing a public-house in Oxford4load; The Bill of Ex change was not given hi evidence; but the other paft of the charge was proved. • In answer to thIS -case,: it appeared that the Plaintiff, soon after:the death ot. the-Defendant's hutiband, insinuated himself into her good graces, by the way (as she was now a single womanYoflook ing after 'her property for . her. He came to reside in the ,house, used comitantli to serve the customers with liquor, anti was in the habit of using the. house AS his own,.going to the till and taking the contents to pay . labourers, &C. 'He Went so tar as to otter marriage to this Lady, until some inquisitive friend of her's • disCoVered that he ha.: dwife and family'resici ing in Rathbone-plaCe; bin - being separated from these, he proposed to live with the Defendant: At one time she gave him the note in question, upon couditicu that it was not to be' demanded until otter her death; and he had almost persuaded her 4 tb cinit her. house in town, and go with him to re-: • • sicie .at 'the Golden Lionpnblic-nblise, ttattsgite, when he was arrested for debt, anci thrown into pri son. These parties bad frequent bickeringsabont -coming to a seqlement of accounts ; and when she accused him of being - in her debt, his constant answer was " Where are your vouchers ?" Lord El.f..F.Nßonouott 'left it to . the Jury to say, under all the circumstances, whether they believed this . was tretn the'Defeudant to the Plaintiff? or whether,"by the latter residing entirely in' the fortnels hOuse, and h'aving deceived various sums of money„at different times froin.,her, the debt might not 'have been liquidated ? - . . _ . Tile Jury, after 'a moment's besitatioiljound. verdi6t • fp r the .I)e' ferfciant. Th 6 other cases ‘v ere of ,no public ItioinOlt. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WESTNIIN3TEr;kb • ' JUNE 3. DEAN V. BRETT. Mr ;:.Serjeant SAEPLUEIIII applied ,for a Ruie to show cause why a Mr. Sinith,,,arr Attorney, should not pay ,to,the Peau„khe sum of 30001. which, he liad received for the release of a bond of annuity. From the statement made, it appear l . ed that,. this Mr. had been formerly em ployetl, in his, .official capacity, lo .purchase an annuity for 'Mr. Dean, from Mr. Brett. This business he performed, made out the deeds accord ingly.> and received the annuity as Mr. Dean's At torney-, which he remitted to his Client. After a considerable time had expired, Mr. Brett proposed to release the annuity. Mr. ,Smith, as his Attar-, ney, made out the necessary instrument of assign ment, and received back the -30001. from Mr. Brett for the re-purchase; and 5001. of which sum he iMmediately re-paid his Client. ' Some time afterwards, hotVevery when applied to by Mr:. Dean,for the remainder of the sum of 3,0001. he . re fused to pay it to hitn, alledging that he (Mr. Deat - ii' his Client,) was tint ,in his sound "senses, and Was therefore incapable of manao - ing his own affairs. Rule granted. 811371 a. On Tuesday, ,the Lady of Thomas Brown, Esq. of New Grove Mi'e•- Eni 'of a Son. - - YeAenlay . —rnciniini, in Hill-street, Berlieley.S . quare, the Lady of Thomas Read Kemp, Esq. of a Daughter, On•the 3st at Woolvvi,ch y Mrs. Cleveland: wile of 'Captain Cleveland ; l the Royal Horse Artillery, of a Daugh ter. MARRIAD. Yesterday,. at Newington Church, Caprain R. H. Father— ingharn, of the'. corps of _Engineers in the Ilan. East-IndiA Company's Service, in Miss Robertson, eldest daughter of the late lames Rot4ertson,. Es 'of Throgrnort,,n-street. In Oebruar) q. at St. George's, Hanover-square, B. Starr, Esq, of the King's Wn Staffkit Militia, to Miss Ben nett, of Clewer-House, Windsor. DIED. On . thq 25th ult. at St. Ancli - eves, Scotland, Nic'hoTas Innt, Esq: Vrofessor Nfath,inatics in the Urrited College of St. Andrew's. On Saturday morning, in IVillirri -streot, Dublin, Alder. man William James : he r de•out on Frithy forenoon, re turned in apparently better health Om he had experienced for a considerable tine, and eat very hearty /lamer • after which; while in the ad of takinglitglass of wine, he all into a fit, and never alter uttered a sentence. On Monday last; at her seat at Glympton Park; Oxford shire, Mrs. Ann Wheste, in the 76th year of her age, last r surviving d4ughte of the late Sir Thomas Wheate, Bart. of that County. The same day, ,suddenly, Mr. William Kitchener, Tea dealer; of•VinsbuO-pla.c.se. On Tuesday evening last, at his fathers house at Old Ford, Mr. lioltwood;kin. in consequence of the bite of a mad dog, whic . :hhe sustained four months since. _ On the 26th ult. Mr. Thomas English, of the Temple, youngest son of Walter English, Esq. of Kingston. ()n'the 274 ult....at, .Anerdeeil, Mr. John Davidson. Gold' smith. Mr. Davidson has bequeathed the surn sterling, to be vested, on security, in the hands . of the Trea surer of . Aberdeen, until it -accumulate to the principal sun' of z 1001. the annual rent whereof his Trustep were appoint ed to apply in founding a school tur the'education, gratis; of the children of the llibite Fishers and Pilots, in and about Footdee, as well - as the 'children Of such seafaring peopleirs the neighbourhood as cannot , afford them proper education.. PRICE 0. STOCKS Y EST E Balk Stock-, shut Navy ;.pet Cent,. shut 5 per Cent.. 1 797, Irish 5 tier : Cent. - p;,.; Lent. Sat 3 per Cent. Red. 63 tit 3 per Cent. Con. s'out bank 1.. Ann. 17 15-16ths Dino Sizort Ann. R DA Y. India Stock, • India Bonds, 6s. 7s. pr. South Sea Stock, Exchequer Bills, 4s. zs. Oniniurn, Irish ditto, Imperial 3 par Cent. Ditto Ann. Cons. for Opening,. 64 i vITHEN Professional Men of Education .and Y Responsibility deviate from the geneiai System ty the selection of a peculiar branch, the sa n c t ion o f l o n g con tinued success is the best criterion of superiority. Thirteen years have I devoted my practice to the exclusi ye treatment ut ' Three Disorders, and the•suCcessful result of my plan gives :ne additional ardor to oppoSe, as tar as I am 4ble, , the ravages of those complaints. which Are the. most important in the Catalogue Of Human. Infirmities. After initiation into every Branch, as' an Army Surgeon, 1 formed a wish at an early period of Practice to -rescue in dividuals - from • the ignorance of uneducated men, or the 'equally dangerous precipitancy of general Praditioners. • The Three Disorders, -to,the Cure of which I- have de. voted - my attention, comprise every . species o f VE N Al. I -RENF gCTI.O.N, whether of a recent or long du.• ration zdly, All kinds of debility, whether arising frog) the habits of school -boys, -or the indulgences of mature age : And, lastly, tiat derangement of the _system in wo men, which is called 13A.K.R.F.NNESS, or STERILITY. Numerous' I )iseases are the result of ignorance, or haste in the treatment 'Of a Simple Gonorrhoea; . .and, it not un frequently - happens 'that • the- seeds of Life are poisoned try the indiscretion of an unguarded - hour.—By a superior me thod sueh Complaints are easily cured; and, even where others have failed, • L trust that I may presume to otter A radical re-establishment. • • hew,' itowevcr, are the cases •of complicated chstrear it) • this disorder; compared with the calamitous situations of Men, who, fr,,in• an. indulgiince m a solitary vice, or. the prevalent gaieties of a •fashionable life, acquire that state • at Debility, which lathe unavoidable consequence of such pernicious habits. - • Where the 'atiliappy sufferer broods over his misery, bog carefuily conceals. his 'misfortune, it may be sWne consa. - lation:for han.to know, that although it be an ehjeet -.. doubt tf)r uncertainty with other Practitioners, the removal . • 'of. these I.)er;:hencies. by the .gradual progress of Renova' lion, is the acquirement of gay Expenence. If the rite, of Bacchus or` Vends have began to reduce Manly vigoutr - Much' anxiety will-tie prevented by an early Counte7;ic tion of thiS .languid State ;: and in Oiese •cases, no groa t . d;l'icuity, :till occur. but where . t.r.is lialicTenev has for ''cars CXistey, a prOP er nerseveritice is mcc.spensably •!equisite :to revive the slew' - . bering Sparks of i.if4 , cad to re r anirnate the C,onstito don. MtA 1( I E :;%1 N , who have' been di sa ppoint' ( I 'in their e:tpeetations of a Family, May be assured, that IT 'most ilitatit...cs,..Sili.li'defeas are curable bp MediCal TheT . ,se4;resy which js so essential- to my un•ieriaKing , thequaliticart ,, ns which 1 hivepresume , .. 4 ., to state, (orT i. the bass or 1:4 Fetensions, and in coinciden, suc A this . intmuition is•giveri, that Mr. litre nay be cor.suj c : :personally, or py Letters (ir.closing ..I..sniztl Note), ct notisc,, N. Arundel strew - , Strand, ne.:.; T em ple 1 3 a r. • '—" here is tut addition:3 I Entrance in- IN aref-stree' r a:l; u ming, and the Name is on frith the doors. ' R NAI R tE , Member of the.ltnyal I.::ll , rge ()Burg- 4 ) 115 A LA UT lON . St)lne Persons who falsely assert t.i Selves ti) be Nieinhers of the Royal Cbllegi.-,•having for setts a; . t ral months past.eopted my Adveitisements 'ainiost wott - rr y , :word, and inserted them as ,p or. it an d duty to mention, that those Person-; are not Member; of College in London, EdinhliTgh, or els, -, :ytti:re, uor have tbel • any' rtgot to pradtse Surgery In London. LONDON ; Printed by R ICHARD HA RR is, Of No. 4, Mortlett-ccurt, Bow-street; and Published by WILLIAM ARMIGLR SCRIP PS, of South Molton.strett, Grots‘enor-squacc ; At tl.e Sum-OFFicH No. 11:2, ;:tra.::d; where Advertisements, Orders for the Paper, I etters for the Zditgr, &c. (post-paid), must be addres•.ed. LAA 7 LER. Mr. Serjeant VpGiIAS; moved fora Rule to shew cause why capif....s should . not 'be:.set 'aside, his Client having been, taken in .execution upon a writ', for 661. i Os. alledged to be: the sum awarded to be paid . by him, 'in cOnSequence of the decision. of a cause tried last term, while the : utiuti sum fonnd due was only 561. ins., being , I 01. • less than that ,now demanded. It could . be sworn that the sum of 561. los. had been regularly tspdered in payment, but had been refused.,—Role granted. Tie COURT was engaged most of the day in hear ing legal arguments of no general. interest. CEYLON.-A -±- c,ia War has. again . broke out in . .Candy, .The Kinghaving rendered hithselfVery..uh -.pOPtilztr by some severe k;ditis, , two of hiS principal .othcers reolted,. atidWere - joined'bY a large body, of troops. ,Some skirmishes had taken place in the jungles,- at the date of the lasi accounts, between the opposing - parties, without, hOWever, producing 'any results of moment. The Commission appainting Sir O. H. BAnr.pw to the GovernmentOf, Madras, and the other P a p ers connected with the recent arrangeMents in. India, were trade upon, Sinurdar.4t. the India House, "in order to besent on board the` Charger Gun-brig, by which theyare to be taken out. Mr. PEpitiE, SeL cond in Council, is ultiMately to succeed to the • Madras Government. A Dispen - sation has :passed the Great . Seal to enable the Rev. VicEstmus KNOX, a D. to hold the Re6tory qC Runwell, in Essex, 'together with that of Ranisden Crays, in the 'same C oun ty ; b ot h in his _own patrbnage. • A family as well known as any in the kingdom, - which now moves in the first circles of fashionable drssipation, has been very lately plunged-into a most distressing situation, by the unexpected appearuce of an hitherto considered'illegitithate son, who has returned from 'a far distant country, where he has bens isolated for years, to claim his 'firth-right.. This denouentent, which is en-train; and nothing can prevent its publicity, will estrange •a very fashionable Lady from all her dearest interests and conneCtions. It will astonish and place in, a very' aukl.vard situation a favourite son. • A poor AC - tor, at Norwich, per sona ti ng Grazuger, in the Farce. of Who's the Dope' on his' benefit night,: which turned out a Very wet evening,and occasioned a bad ,house,in reply to' Gradus'sri:•ek• quotation, where' Ohl . Doily sits as umpire, ,began thus, "-0 raino nighto! spoil() bentfito (pito." A curious circumstance took place-last Monday, at the Duke of .KENT'S apartments on Windsor Ter race :—the day being remarkably fine, the windows which lookod into the garden were thrown up to admit air ) when a swarm of bees from the garden entered at :the window, and ,alighting On an arm chair in the room, gathered in a cluster, where they remained Until a servant Caine in to adjust the room, who, finding them . on the chair in a lump, went and procured a hive, and having it prepared with 'milk and honey; gave.thrn a fre,li abP4e. _ RESTAURATEUR.—The, ibllowing account is given of the origin of this word :—" About the year 1765,: a man named Boulanger conceived the- ludierous idea of obeninc - a shop for restorative-soups ) and ac: cording!)' place d 3 the fbllowing inscription over hi 6 door :—Venite, ad me binnes:qui.stamacho•labol et cgo restaurabo Come unto me all ye that , labour in stomach, and I will restore you: The singularity of this inscription, the novelty of' the trade, and the dearness of the provisions, soon put Boulanger into the -possession of a tolerable fortnne„ and in a short time inanyother -shops - were opened on a similar plan, till at length the tertn of mitaura-,,. teur has completely superseded that of traiteur.7 • . , ROCK . . BELL_ c LionT-HouSE.- 7 -Preparation§ are now in considerable fbrwardness for .carrying into' execution this important Work, solong the sy.biezft of 'Parliamentary • discussion. It i i ,s to he erected Utider the diredion of Mt. RENNfh, who uses the Aberdeen gratlite, as the,Most durable stone where with to construLt the foundati o ns a nd outside course of the building. , , , , Several of the bodies of the unfortunate persons, of the 7gth Regiment, lately lost near .Landguard Fort, have been washed on shore ; among _ Whon. was that of Captain DAWS 0 N . It, was carried to Abe Regiment at NVeely, and there interred with mili tary honours. ' iespolc Numbers Ate in much the rage in the present Lottery; in consequence of three of the Capitals ; in the last Sch&ne, falling to fancied num bers, it may not be unim - portant to notice the subse quent events that took place from the Purchase of seleaed;Lottery Tickets on .:_the King's , birth-day. On _the 4th of June, 1803,__No. 7,686 and No. 13,747; the first gained 20,0001. the latter a 10,0001. .Prize.— And on the 4th of June 1806, was drawn, Nro. - -12,710; which turned :up- a 'Prize of 10,0001. ; all of w;iich,Capitals : .were sold in Shares. From these striking .aud undeniable, - ,oecarrences, willsthe votaries of fortune not pay•Fpecial devotion to the present 4tll,4nfjune ? The period hemreon: the annokincernent of the present Lottery Sclreme: and cointhericement, of its drawing, is the : Shortest • ever experienced. The principal reason:mtus, to-be, ti-om only of 20,000 Tickets. This is a reason, : ,however, esl p:ciedly when the consequence of the Scheme is con sidered, that oughtn't) , prove a strong inducement to Adventurers to i be early in their: purchasesy is it eau= not but be sttppoi4 Lcitry of so few num , ' bers will very soon ,lie disposeci.of. • SWF NAIVS: POOL T, ..TUNE . 2. Arrived —the IllesSing, Walls, frcsM London • Symmetryi Duncan, from • Teigninotith ; •Hal4on, Lamb, from Sun,- derlind ; Dart, Harvey, •ACtive, Nev.' Hope. Manelavvs, from Portsmouth. Sailed—the Anna. Andrews, Maria; Montze), and. Three Sisters, Pledge, for London ; Industrious, - Aldridge, lot Southampton ; and Aftred, Pack, for Liverpool. GRAY PS END,' it.rs/1"3. Sailed—the Venus, !ohnstone r for the ,Cape of Good Hope; [oho, Ritchie, for kisinore ; 'Scott, for Co penhagen; Kinirmn, for Bost - ill; 'Pan, Twe Sisters, and F4vourixe, -Conraris, for Touningen.