The Sun. — London, England, 1802-03-20 00:00:00

shere he will. How we 7.'ere respelled when first lye came to &Amhara, and now how we are de spised ; but it is not my fault. He is as fit to be a Minister of State, a a Manager of a. Parish. He should try -to make himself respefted by the rich as well as_rhe poor ; but that is impassible. The pa rish went on quietly enough till he came. He has set every' 'body togethei by the ears. He is noisy and - ove;bearini; in his manner, and only fit to be a c mstable or a :ttriier at Baw.street.'' Th.;mzeis D cry said he was an oilman, and .had knOtv'n the D,!tendant litany years ; he served his family, and was pet fatly acquainted with his writ ing ; the writivg produced did not, upon the whole, look like his, but there were certain letters extremely like it ii he could think him capable of disguising his hand writing, he should believe these letters were written byhim ; he had no hesitation in sty_ ing there were many parts alike. Qn-his cross-examination he said, the more mi nutely he. looked at the i lecers, the more he was convinced there were many of them exactly alike : if he had received an order from him in such a hand writing, he should shave executed it ; he should have supposed he might lh.ve had the gout in his hand, or that he might have been unwell when he wrote John Bonnor, an . in,speffir of Franks 'at the Post-office, statett, that lte eras by habit capable of ascertaining whether a hand_writing was a natural currency, or an itnitation by some other person, or an attempt by the writer to disguise his hand ;'he had looked at the letters carefully—they were cer tainly written in a disguised hand, he had not the smallest doubt of it. He was then asked whether, by comparing these letters with the other writing, admitted to be the-Defendant's, he could state with certainty that the perm who wrote the one wrote the other ? The ATTORNEY GENER AL_Objeaed to the ques tion ; he had approved the admission of such evi dence recently in the case of Foster and Mellish ; .but in consequence of not being fully prepared, he. had not been able to urge those reasons which he should now offer. The Letirned Advocate in a speech of great ability contended agaisist the prin ciple of evidence recognised by the modern practice of comparison of hand-writing by a witness who had never seen the Parry write—it was a practice peril ous and dangerous to the life and liberty of the Subjea, aid never till lately admitted even in the wort times and the worst Judges. Ho then re ed the cases •of Algernon Sydney, the 7 Bi- _ . shop', and in short every case upon the subjea down to the lasi decision of :Mr. justice LE BLANc, in Foster and Mellish. He insisted that the novel dOatine of evidence was in violation of that prin ciple of evidence by which the people of this coun try were secured in the cnjoynient of their rights, proyerty, liberty, and eery thing dear to them. He was followed on the same side by Mr, ADAM, Mr. CoNsT, and- PY. I\ll-..GARRow, Mr. Serjeant BEST, Mr. MAR _ _ movr, and Mr. REYNOLDS, were Neard in an_ ewer ; after which the ATTORNEY GEiIERAL re. plied. Sir BEAUMONT HOTHAM delivered his opinion at length, and decided that such evidence was not admissib!e.. Mr. another of the Inspeaors of Franks, deposed to the letters being written in a disguised hand. Mr. Greenv.,:od, the Clerk of Messrs. Lee and Co. Bankers, said the Defendant kept his cash at their house. He well kritv his hand-writing, laving paid his drafts for the last twenty years. He had looked over the letters, and had hardly any doubt as to their having been written by the De_ fendant : there were many parts of them not dis guised at all, particularly the words hypocritical villain," which were exally his charafter. If a draft had been presented in such a hand-writing, he-would have paid it without any reference or hesi ,tation whatever. Wm. Faller lLtd lived twenty years with Mr. Cator, knew his hand-writing perfettly ; believed the letter it, b.! his hand-writing ; he bad not •the .mAlkst particle of doubt. • Samuel Heard, a Stationer at Bromley, said, the lettt•r:i produced were all written upon paper of the manufeelure : the maker's name was Taylor, and thc• date in the water mark . 1796 ; it was call ed. uncut foolscap. He dealt 'in paper of that sort, and many other sorts ; he had not sold any of it to more than two ,persons. Mr: Jackson applied _ . . . to him for some, but he had none left ; he could not mention any person he had Sold a single sheet to, except the Defendant and the Bishop of Roches ter ; their servants usually came for it. and paid him ; the Witness said he had seen the Defendant last week at hi; own house e he went there to take a little Bill ; the Defendant said to him, " You never spld me any paper ?" to which he " No, Sir, not diredly to you, it was not for me to know who the paper was for." He was not surprised at the question, because the business had been the subject of conversation. This was all the evidence fur the Plaintiff. Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL then addressed the Jury in behalf of the 'Defendant. He commenced his Observations by congratulating the Court and the Public upon tlle . decision of the Learned judge upon the point ct law respelling the admisSi . bility of the evidence--a decision which, in his opinion, had reiieved the country froth one of the most • grievous oppressions it ever had suffered : for if such evidence could have beeni.eceived in the case 'of Mr. Cator, for a misdemeanour, the same ob scure, dark proof, would lie a ppli ca bl e in, every case of felony. Men would be condemned and punished with death opOn the testimony . of persons who were not familiar with their writing from havirnrseen them write, but by strangers who had no other medium of proof than the hare comparison of riling. With regard to the Case itself, it was of the deepest importance, not only as it affeded the Defendant but the Public ; it was a question wheth e r 'a'Gentleman of fortone,charilder, - aod honouelli - a done an ad which, if he was guilty of, stamped him as one of the most weak as well as the must wicked of mankind ; an ad which render ed irt doubtful whether his folly or malignity most • predominated ; an at .which 'aimed at the destruc tion of the peace of a family. If he thought the Defendant was. not perfectly innocent -of the fnu: • charge imputed to him, he should most readily co'e.. • sign him to the criminatory observations •of his Learned Friend, li-wever severe. they might be.- -The Jury, .before they could pronounce him guilty '• of such a crime, would retied upon'the char.o of the nein who was supposed capable of haying coin -mitted it. The Defendant was a Gentleman who had passed a life in the service of the East India Company, uncontaminated liy the suspicion of any vice. 'lt was not the demerits of his brother, John Calor, the Jury were to try, and therefore he was persuaded they would discard from their minds any prejudice they might have entertained in conse quence of their opinions with regard to any part of his - conduct. Could it . .be imagined -that so malignant and vulgar A' libel could have proceed ed from a man, Wilt's& life•had been charaderized by qualities of an opposite nature. He was a man uniformly spoken of in terms of. resped and kind ness by those whose good opinion was most.valo able. :He '• had, at an early period, gone to the . East Indies, where, by his industry, he gained -a respectable .fortune, and had retired to Beckenham, near the residence of his brother, to enjoy. it. He did not mean to infer that the Prosecutor,. -Mr. Jackson, would have imputed such an offence as this was to the Defendant, if he had not persuaded himself into a belief that he was the author of the libels ; but it was perfealy natural for persons, . when they had - once adopted a notion, to persevere in it, however mistaken ii might 'be. - He could not helpeahinkin4 Mr. Jackson would have acted with inttelt 'mOrti pro.: priety,, if he had, investigated the ground of his suspicion before he had attributed to the Defendant a deed of so infamous a nature. The Learned Adv o _ ' cate then proceeded to comment • upon the evidence, and observed, that the- Defendant had never mixed in the controversies (tithe parish; that he had never had any difference with the Prosecutor, except the trifling dispute in the carriage respediog Ik-dormers, 'never doing any good ; that lie was a mad of - mild,- good-natured and inoffensive manners, and of liberal. education ; and, therefore, thai it was absolutely improbable he should have been the author of such infamous libels : he inferred, that the very circum stance of his having furnished the Prosecutor with the means of substantiating his charge in the mat,". ner he had done,. by writing to him those letters which had been compared with 'the libels, were a proof that he was 'conscious of his innocence, and was not aware of any pi;ssible way in which those letters could he employed to his disadvaetage. He then stated the nature of the eyidCnce he meant to lay before the Jury, and concluded by trusting they would not by their verdiet hold up the Defendant as an objeet for - the finger to point -at fOr the re mainder of his days: He then proceeded to.call his Witnesses. . The Biskv _of Rochester said, -he had known the Defendant. nearly eight years. The Defendant's family and his own were in habits of intimacy.. His opinion of him was, that lie was a pl a in, hO nest , good-natured Gentleman, A very valuable neigh bour, and, he believed, incapable of c om po s i ng t h e libels-in question. His Lordship said, he was well acquainted with his hand-writing, and he was of opinion, the libels had not the least resemblance to ' it.—Upon the cross-examination of the Witness, it irppeared that his knowledge of the Defendant's hand-writing was derived from letters written sub sequent to the libel, Mr.. Burwell, formerly of the Supreme Council of Deogal, , said, lie was 'Well acquainted with the Defendant's hand-writing : he was surprized that any one should haVe supposed him 'the writer of the libels ; he had examined them narrowly, and, the more- lie looked at them, the more he was convinced they were not the produdion of his pen ; from his long knowledge of hint, he did not think him a man likly . .to - have done a 'thing of the.kind ; he had been in. situations of considerable trust in India, and he believed incapable of a dishonourable action. , Upon his cross-examination, he admitted he had, as one of the Members of the Council, signed an or_ der for the dismissal of the Defendant, in conse quence .of an imputation of perjury, for having sworn that a debt, which he well knew avas due from the House in which he was a Partner,- was not owing front' the firm, a n d f or en d eavour i n . aft „.., the debt upon anoth er House. The Wit - at, gip tempted to explan- t hi s , by s a y i ng , thane was averse to the dismissal of the Defendant, •- but that he was compelled to sign the order because the ma- _ jority of the Council were against him. He said he was restored after a suspension of several years. Mr. Smith Bagwell, the brother of the last Wit, ness, said, he had long been in the habit.olcOrre , ponding with the Defendant, and was perfedly ace. quainted with his manner of writing. The libel had not, in his opinion, the least resemblance to . it. . Mr. Starke!, the Defendant's Solicitor, deposed . to the same area ; hut, upon his cross-examination, admitted, that the words " hypocritical villain," did•very much resemble his. hand-writing.. Air. Farmer, a Gentleman, of Wickham; in Kent, said, the Defendant was an inoffensive-man, and totally incapable of writing the libels imputed to him. - - Mr. Grote, of Beckenham, said the Defendant was a man not likely to have written angnymous letters : he was a quiet peaceable Man, bringing up hiS fa mily virtuously', and exercising all the proper duties of a father. Mr. Jenner, of DoelOr's Commons, said he was intimately acquainted with the Defendant—he was a man of most inoffensive manners, fulfilling-all the duties of life—as far as his opinion went, he was a most worthy member of society. - •,. Mr. Foster, of Beckenham, said he had known the Defendant sixteen years ; he had a rising family of his own, and thought the Defendant and his fami. ' , ly the fittest for them to .associate with ; his family was a patern of domestic harmony ; the Defendant was a peaceable, friendly, inoffensive, acid valuable neighbour; he conceived him the most unlikely man in the world to have committed so infamous an action as the one imputed to him. t' STOL KS, ' friv. Lee, the banker, states, that the labels had not the least reseinblance to the Defendant's hard teriting. On his .crosg.examination he said, the Witness, Mr. Greenwood, had been his Paying Clerk , 2 5 years. Mr. ilobart, stated, that the Defendant'was in. capable of writing letters of so libellous a tendency. The Counsel for the Prosecution entered upon his reply. He maintained that the evidence for the De fendant, so far from controverting the fart of his guilt, establiethed and confirmed it. He said, he little thOught when he seleaed . his witnesses from the tradesmen whose means of existence, in a great measure, depended upon the Defendant and his bro ther, that he should haVe been able to have extrad ed from them evidence of so strong and unanswer able a nature as they had g. yen. They had, however, afforded a proof that English tradesmen were as inde pendent in spirit as the higlrest Peer or Prelate in the land. He enimad vetted upon the arguments used by the ATTORNEY GENERAL, and observed, they only excited his pity that so great a. man. should have been driven, by the weakness of his case, to the necessity of using them. He referred to the testimony given by the different witnesses, which he contended,. amounted ro' next to nothing, corn. pared with the decisive evidence on the part of the Prosecution. With regard to the argument founded upon the improbability of a man of the Defendant's charader• writing such libels, it was ridiculous. It was-the constant course of persons "of education, who condescended to the infamy of writing libels, to un derwrite themselves, and adopt .a -style suited to the meridian of Gru'l-streer. The. Learned Advocate having commented upon the evidence on both sides, finished his observations by expressing his firm con viethei that the Jury would . not .besitate in pro nouncing the Defendant guilty, painful as it was to consign a man who moved in an honourable and re_ speelable sphere of life, to infamy, contempt, and disgrace. Sir BEAUMONT I - foil-IAM said, that after the labo. ribus attention of the Jury .for so many hours, he should deem it extremely indiscreet to occupy their , time many minutes by_his observations. The case was reduced to a :tingle question, namely, wheiref the Defendant Mr. Joseph "Cator, had been guilty or not of the scandalous aetion imputed to him there was- no legal pOint to be considered, it was a plain matter of fad. The Learned Judge -recapi tulated. the evidence, and observed upon it ; .he stated that those letters could not have been written by any person w . ho was indifferent to and unac4 quainted with the politics of the Parish of Becken.. ham. If the Defendant had written them, as had been, justly rein:irked, it certainly was a very un fortunate coincidenee of circumstances, that the libels should have been written upon the_ palter which had'been sold only % to himand the Bishop of Rochester. The Witnesses for the Defendant had allowed there was a strong resemblance of charaaer between the libels and the Defendant's ordinary tnanner.of writing, but they had at the same time stated their conviction, that a Man of his charaaer was inettpable of so ban. an aCtion. It was a ques tion which entirely belonged to the Jury. Nu merous and'respe&able as the Defendant's friends, were, yet, if they were ten times more numerous and respeftable, their evidence ought not .to weigh a moment if- the Jury were satisfied, and felt no difficulty in determining as 'to the fa6t of his being the author of the letters. If they were not posi tive as to his guilt, then certainly it was a,case in which they were bound to take into their serious consideration the very high charaCter the Defendant had received: That their verdict would be con formable to the justice of the case, 'and satisfa&orY to the Public, who were materially : concerned in the question, was what he entertained - no manner of doubt of—they would weigh the evidence on both sides, compare the letters, and give that opinion. which, .as honest men, would justify them to the world. The Jury retired for about a quarter of an hour, and returned a verdia, pronouncing the Defend ant Guit,TY. When disorders of the mostmalignarit nature hive either from hereditary causes, the luxury or dissipation of the age, crept, as it were, involun tarily into our frame ; it is of the . utmost importance to thOse.afiliOed with them to know where to meet with a permanent and radical cure. This having long been the objeCt of Dr. Soto tote, of Liver. pool, he has atiength consented to mike public his Anti-Impetigines, a Medicine founded on a Chemi.: cal and philOsoihical basis, for the cure . of the Scurvy, King's &c; &c. and which he has administered during a long course of private prac tice With' . the most complete and never-failing- suc cess, in the•mosti,;bstinate cases. The powers of -this Medicine are of the most gentle and invigorat ing nature, gradually cleansing the blood from every impurity, and restoring the. Patient .to his pristine health, when every other has entirely failed, as may be fully seen in the Pamphlets delivered gratis, by all the Venders in most Towns; ENGLISH STATE LOTTERY; SFIIENT EENT H I)AY.—The following NTLimbm were drawn 'Prizes. No. 34,445, a Pri;e of zooOt. . • No. 56004, tor, Prizes of sol. each. SHIP NEWS. CRAyESEND 7 Mn.RCN J. Passed by—the Stag, --, from Guernsey; and Hendrick, Norton . , from Pillan. Sailed —the Dalrymple, Shed, for Cadiz; Mentor, —, for Antwerp ; Mediterranean Packet, —, for Guernsey ; Hope, Lad, for Rotterdain; Mary Anne, —, for Havre ; and Guete Erwagting, —, for Hamburgh. PRICE O . IttLY. Bank Stock • India Stock Nary 5 per Cent. lota E xcheg. dills par :s. prem. par ; per c ent. 1797, shut ' Fundable ditto prem. I rislt ; per Cent. , shut 3d Exchequer Bills par 4 per Cent. Con. shut . .New S. S..Shrek per Cent. lied, shut. Onininin • , , 3 per Cent. Con. 69i 9k !timer. 3 per Cent. 68 Ditto Scrip Ditto Ann.- 12 7. i6i • - Hank Long Ann. shut - dank foroopcning Ditto Short Ann. India for. ditto ISO . • . Ditto Scrip Consols liir Account 691 - VLSI LONDON t. Printed by ti u NA N .NPNI I LLAN, (ot Low-Street, Covent-Garden),; and Published by' W z lAmAR MI o R S CRIPPS , (of Horse. At the auN-Orrlct, No. z, Strand ; wh,cre Advertis eme nts, Orders ier the Paper, Letter] ,for the Editor, Sc c, (pyst-tai NAVIGABLE CANAL, SHARES, NIONT'HLV By Mr. SCOTT, ,v's, On Friday, April -2, ve &Clock, at Garra‘ ,, . Change-Ali:: , Lo.:don N V jG'- LMARES IN TH E . .FOLLOWING TrONS, viz. HIKE The - STAFFORDSHIRE and WORCESTE Rt, ro s- Canal ;TW SHARES in this 'lOng established a nd p perous Navigation : the Profits are now at ,the r;:::: 1 / 4 ,1 per Share per Annum, h increasing prospects. l' The GRAND JUNCTION and ,PADDING'IM NA L, Original Subscription Share, Halt Shares,- and ( TION,AL LOAN, bearing s per Cent. Interest, Fl)ilL' Half Yearly, convertible into whole or half .Shares. The KENNET and AVON CANAL, Or2g l "/ to and New Shares, payable by Instalments. Also Shar,:s the MO.NNIOUTH, ROCHDALE, and the ASHI 3 Y -1) LA , tO UCH Navigations, Particulars Hatehett's Hotel, Piccadilly; at Garraway'st and of Mr. Scott, Ludgate-hill, who is• tomnhissio ncd sell Part ot the above, and Shares in various Concerns an Estates, by Private Contrad. () THERE are are no classes . men of greater w it' id Lance to society tls.n those which devote. their time:lcl3, talents to the pre7sertiatiOnof the health of their fellow tures: How eminently successful • the late 1; KA N CI S P I LSBU RN was in this truly laudable employment , Ij it ed pletely evinced by the' rapidity of . sale which' his ceic""i,j,, A NTISCORBU TIC; DR.O PS hf L ye invariablyinntr ix ' ( d As a pufitier of the bleu f, r:•storer of the -constitut bracer of site system,' their etkets - have - bedn May be seen by.thc Surprising'curoi. of persons Mu' o at, hided with SCorbutic and Nervous Comp:4; l,l. s! Rheumatism, &c.. and the deteztion of those lin pOS tar - hoc brineans of forged bills and ()Ole' . pretended credotials, vended a spurious compositiop of Alis truly ex‘cllent cine, must be a satistacticn to all persons wl n i potent idea of the absolute ileessiry there is ill being o r sr i p g. to pureha,e the genuine Re k nedy, a s w e ll as of prie g , r . i .ir,c. personal property from illftinOment. The rittLE AA c 1;31, is distinguished by the Patent, on the. bettle,f and wrapper ; and as a fuither guard; by . levour t; .1.1 " - ',fils.- jesty's Commissioners of the Stamp thev'hav4, *I a staitip on each bottle, printed MN:It:LK N"-:• on o:et, Prepared anti sold at the Disperislry, - No 'N. 15 Soh ( ' — ' l • and by the general venders of patent medicines iii t`' t - country, in bottles . ss. and . 11 . . e. 4. duty included. To WILLIAM BRODC A,- - I, - • . • Author of " to Old .1 '•• .3r- WHEN . an init victtla, liiis exilateliccd anY titular mark of Jr,indtie.s.;, his • v"j":.., j uo:e happiness have been promoted, hatural than to see 4. out the persoriby Vt•boiri .vre served, fir the Purpdse,of expiessing.otir Vrateful.:ens 1,,,ve - favour b,...stowLd: Bid, in cases 01 llealTh, i iit ed been recd. led 'from the last denial:able riotri Patur, , , and reiffored to the.foll enjoyment of a n the v , p si.• blessings of lite, .are fOrciblicalled on by c.,,,cry.:o"We deration, to acknowledge it it the inc)si owe this kn:illy to our own feelings,•vvi,Lliiiirtist. on the occasion, to the skill and, talents of."-t '' tor, 'which merit every er.coiniuni, and to the public I . in order that those who. maystaild.in need of sfflltli ti. . 7 • May know where to ,rective neral observations,4 shall p-roce et. to stato the pal ric„ u that ltas occasioned them, andlo lay before the Pu 3 i ,; , ro o,t lig wade [titan; effects tine. I have experienced under the "ti' k i o tect afflictions that can possibly beat us. I was born and cd_ W inclic:iter, arid at scvonteen versity at Oxford. Prior to'' lea'•-ing- Winelicstetiole,t more particularly at Colleee., I - w. t s r ,uneed to the grievous state, by, the horrid'and unnatural plaetices too .. " at ciclent to youth, and which ale not baneful W i6 li to j health, than shunt in the eYe c:i" God.. I was , at first, t.k'' • with a dimness rif sight, a W•Jiakiies s in Inv ar '"Bar'r,' pression of spirits. 10 this situation I appba" t `' ~cde" Wenzel, tile fainous Oculist, who informed me it pr° (; ,,,f,jeer from the optic nerves. for some riffle foliowed IPS 3 till one returning froth shooting, -,„; zed vcats of age-went to thit numbness in my limbs to such a oegree, as to leKi . 1, 00 concl•-!... , that I should entirely lose ?be use of theol. f Os' • indu ' . to put myself under the hands at Dr. W • ford ; uut neither his aid, nor the watets at B i iiii; ,rits place I visited, afforded tie e the least relief ; ysi iz ' t , f joij length were so seriously depressed with violent of the hoart, ai.d my flesh so much. det:ayed, that I ;', o) ,:rs! a mere skeleton. Observing, however, in trfs Age," detticatel !Us Xlalestv, I was induce(7. ro 10 ,1 t ri br n tu r , 3 :a i t u el n y ' discovered tlic 40; 11 1' " I Inive the happiness to so long labbured under. • ni.E.l, that 13V fo ,;„,' ie vice contained therein, and g o i ng through ..a : „"i., - tlll of Dr. Broduth's invaluable ervous cr • , i l° \‘ • thank Heaven, perfeeill• recov N ered, and as well ",-L; e V - in my lite.. oijt3 r6' I have since quitted the University, arid enter into the:holy aotw of matrimony, Nvitll a . the never to be without " A Guide to Old ge ;" 311 "', / jen saute time,. I think it illy duty, to. adviseril youn - o k. follow my example, as a perusair of this excellen t l io aill('3 happily prevent toe afflitted from being preci to:an untimely grave, which, 'bus , for 1)r; fir 6 d aill • most inevitably.have been my case. • stc. if' " I am, Sir, your'.', A• Oxford, 4. A. - r Ofk•'. pitated. ,•• . • The - BOTANICAL SYRUP and NEK v Alo' w l, ; ,- DI A 1,,,t0. be had at • the DoCtor's House, No• 9 ' - street, seven doors from the Lever;,aii Usetill'. , 6l• AA .-• fid.• friars-bridge, in'llottles, at 11. as. its. 6d. au ,l j;. of Golding, No. 4z, Cornhilli' Je6oult and (-liketit,e ' con), No. 1 . 50, Oxtoni-street ; Tutt, R o val EXO- i;nufwyes Newhery, of St. Paul's Roy;tl ; 'Mr.' Cockell's Medici No. 22n, Strand s ; and by most Booksellers ana Venders 'in Atte three Kingdoms,_ • ' • \ V do . HEN Professional Mcn of • Exit n bi ic ' t cc steo l ,.,:, Responsibility-deviate from the genera' ' t lor;; the selettion of a br3ocit the sanct.tolt o:- lie Untied success k the best criterion of superiaritY . Eight years have I devoted my practice to tb. c t c5",,.. 1 1 treatment of Three ' DiSorders and the slicces sf ` l my plan gives me additional ardor-t,' oppose, • ~, the rl.l. whichable, the ravages of those Complaints which a rc important in the Catalogue of I luman sagel! After initiation into .every-- branch, as an ••=r :;•* t eset' e r oe I formed a wish at an early . period..ot Practice or Clivi4uals from the ignorance of unechttlate(Q".' ii ers• S EC equally dangerous precipitancy o f genera l Pratit ti ' 1 1av e 1.- The Three Disorders, to the C ure o f . Which , v voted my attention, comprise every species , - . joili;‘,7 o l l REAL INFECTION, whether o f a receilt u rr; ration: idly, All kinds •of deb i li t y' , whether no t va , the habits of school Aioys, or the iiiduign' e3 ,lll i n , f % age: - And, lastly, fiat derangement . the ; 5 0 men which is called BAR RENN E SS, or It or 11- o ry Nurnerous Diseases 're the result of ignoraq':i vo i d 0' in the treatment of a simple . Conorrin:ca; a"" o iso oe al e' frequently happens that the seeis of Life 3r43? ietlorre the indiscretion of an unguarded lionr.--;2>y tbod such Complaints re easily cured ; and, e_ w others have failed, I. trust that I ma y prestio'` if! radical re-establishment. • d i s ire••• os Few, however, are the cases of c o mplicate rl oo tie t hc tills disorder, compared with• the calamito"s that °( rate Men, who,. from an indulgence in a sOJitare vi , b at 5 ,01 'e 5 1 ' prevalent gaieties of -a fa s hi ona bl e life, acqui t re or of Debility, which is the unav o id a ble conscqtr en- bu t ' pernicious habits.' • mis ejl 'o l3s l Where•the unhappv sufferer broods over his s o rtie o carefully 'colic eats his misfortune, it ;nay' obi c ; 0 0 1 forliim to know, that although it he I"e" . o v3' doubt or uncertainty with other Practitioners, „ t I" rit es of these '. Deficiencies by the gra d ua l progre ss 1 - f . the al it, o in f ile S t a , c d c n in x i i s et o y r 6011, is the acquirement- of . Experience• f ; o ly i ri g r aC'' will ti i)e il p a r V e e ve b fl e t g Cd an tion of this languid State ; and in these eas es ro per difficulty will occur. • 3 is te./ But where this Deticierscv - has for years ex ive th.-: perseverance is indispensably zequisite to NY , t i t oti n t l i ted berinx Sparks of Life, and to re-awn - late the t ° ,n i apl' pa t 'M A R IE I) WOMF N, who have long het:rows, in their expectations of a °Family, may be a ,Jf e dical most instances, su‘lidefeif4 arc curable by o de. t all , by Tin du c tr a e ri fv y i‘f in ti o rit gr ear • The secresy which is so essential to star e t ; and the qualifications which I have p.resurne! twe wir suit lire '34s's of !" ,, Y pretensions, and . in coincia. be cr ;t 131 this mutilation is, given, Plat Mr- 1i.11: 11 N° tC ' ' ,lC 141' personally, or by Letters (inclosing a still' r i oir% o cet , house, No. 29, Arundel street, Strand , fl ea _ 1 There is an additional, Entrance ,11 5 ' adjoining, and the Name is on both the floor", s u rge' M.. It Member of the Royal -ferry-road, Westminstdr) ; mash .b 9 aiicireSSed. A I f I i t , , . 5 1 .4. 1,0 *-N