The Sun. — London, England, 1813-02-24 00:00:00

EN even on the legislature itself in tufferin; nJi disgr ace f u l evils so long to exist, witho u t a timely l• and adequ a t e exertion of tliat authority, of those they were at length repressed.,-, would not be said there was any , Len the spirit of those times and . esent. In the pres en t eas e, it considered , under - what circum ;t ioners came fat ward. It was qed that the great bulk of the 'e in favour of these claims, and Ice, until lately, conclusions to drawn, and now that part of JjeCts came forward to !ipeak for. e Petition was ordered to lie on if LONDON presented Petitions to first, from the Minister, Church hers, of the parish of St. Olive's, secondly,, from rite Minister, he French Protestant Epistopal lon.---Ordered,to lie on the/able. MISCELLANEOUS. MACCLESFIELD presented a Peti- President and Members of the lture, praying their Lordships to a into their consideraton, and nrei thereon as to the House t, 4 HUNTLEY presented a Petition alts, ship-owners, and others, of deen, against the renewal of the ;es of the East India Coat any; he same effect from the Royal in,. whioh documents, with that were ordered to lie on the table. LE notified his intention of mov 'ending of the Bill for the Relief DebtiorS in England,upon Friday. to-morrow. ROUSE OF COItMONS, THURSDAY, FEB. 23. WHITBREAD presented a Petition from . cer- Rriuns, hrOu g ht to London by the Speaker's t o attend the' Committee on the Great 'Petition, who were now left without the of rcturuing to their homes. The Pt t tion 4/ r ead. It set f ort h the hardship of their ' havin g been summoned to town, and not 'lle to get th e i r expellees paid), and prayed afford them relief. WHITBREAD ...hought the House would not ,ersoa-, brought up to-London by their or sbeh a situation, 'without inquiring into ; he would therefore Move, that the Pe be referred to a Committee. `SPEAKER described the course pursue,' in ,illeltqlat similar, but stated this to bei in lrespeets, a, new case, an d t h ere f ore one I the decision of the Bonse would form a cut. Petition, after a few • words from ME. l ea r d, was referred t o a Committee. nerbanAn presented a Petition from eet.;• tvistitetS, 41 layout. .01 the Catholics.— : Ilie persons sigoing W , was th e • -I • hie .d, whom be had d h u f ore. , , occal.on . to • coma take epou himself to lc persons signing this Petition, bad read, duly'coniidered, and thoroty-,hlv tinder ., and he Wished this could he said, of other presented, to. that House more lan the present. The Petition was or lie on the table presented the names of the Com- . " the TtegonY PetitiOn. They' were as .1 Vitcoant Clive, .. J.;.t...r,4Mr, r t‘t• • Browsiow, lisq. • .! .I,V. s: Poiiko, F.,t i . '1,,,4i. Dovetoa, W. It I.).ringlO, l'''''l . ;;. u radst,nv, -.04t.r, Esq. ,Wyatt, i. , :sq. i; '..rtiorlit,ln, Esq. (4, Tivyaey, E.i,( l . , . i:•. ,, hitiv rzt t li Culrett Esq. 311 !), Esq. - . '. le . HickY vverc cuiled to the table awl', z,w0 " 1 .• 3 0 il'ioz,.. Evros' pvesentex ;t Petition from . 41' against, the .Catholie Claims, signed by ik ' d ' of 3,6oo .persons..—Orderecl to he on the • . . LONDoN PETMON'. , .- . . W. eu x .:lll3 Presented a Petition from the W . of London and Westminster, signed ' 4. h 7'4os• of 60 , 1 )00 persons. fie conceived a 45 ad been cast . on the persons signing thion by an lion. Gentleman (Mr. Whit t?: He .(Sit W. C urt i s) would say, this Pe- W, signed by thOse who could read and un kilt W itirear,,ko denied having cast any reflee '4 t hese Petitions', and repeated. the Nvords se ( t, . .. 4.lderman C. SMITH said, every precaution ' te n tak en to guard againstits being signed ~:t s 't le who h a d not .read it. By every nine brit of twenty lie wus confident it had been • , 11: 11 rtti Well. understood. ....I ..•• - . Snikw spo k e i n f avour of the 'Petition, $ 4,1 .: • ended this was a question in which el ii ei l tn t he higher, but 'the middle and lower qa , "111 were much i n t ereste d . I t was signed ll y of th e most enlightened persons in the 4..' • IN N ,A. . 11 .61tsici said, the Petiti on b a d -b een ,hlid ti 'l ecrtai n persons at a n obsettre tneeting, riistll'e City at l arge k new nothing at all of the qtlt,l.ef till the reso l utions of those persons came t„Rdneginning with ". We, the inhabitants of ti t 911 and W estminster,"as they had some ,it a t ,... e t i: 3 i eit the resolutionsof half adort`ti persons ii t ( , _ ef :E "•'"wo and Anchor begin, "We the People ntelati -I . . ei.. , • . . . b,:,: • I \'' • (-iYvris asserted the Petition . to have.' tiledll.4t'illv?ie at a meeting' publicly convened,' and. huger iy, described by the' last 8 ticaker, bati' retie' 131 "Y knew of no public meeting l Pf West'ir',laVing taken place of the inhabitants k ve,, , iu '.'nqr:l:. That to which he alluded, was tilt ik',m,..,rterons: meeting in Palace yard,- and in • ..iati ot , t k _ l ,_ . • . was s. c l aw _ ,:ke,e, voted, he remembered there Fyll,„ 1 , 0 7, I n i tay.ou r of the Catholic Claims. 5 1 .,, .it, I °_ was then „brought up by Sir W. }fort, uaro,Lwas of an immense size, and the A 1 ,ir,...0.4,1e: cotili l not carry it without difficulty. n lon s ih e At i _'`PPearanee excited nitwit. laughter M r 11, melee 41 fear .. ...EAD tinied Is. ' Itrit• • f if this Petition had not vitr ns k gnatures at other übl ic - honses"and ta -4414e t'll'e London p Tavern Sir. J. Straw was not info rnied that it bad, lint be could say that it ,was . signed bynames as re spectable as that one which had been Mu. by tbe Hon. Gentleman (Mr.%Vhitbread) on brin ing forward a petition of a difi'erut nature. o were 10,000 as respectable names as any that co aid be produced. After some further conversation, in which Mr. Bathurst, Mr. C. Smith, Mr. Gipps, and Mr. Whitbread, participated, the, petition was or , tiered to lie on the table. Mr. WHITE brought up the list of the Corn mince on the Stamford Petition, who were called to the table and sworn. The names were - as follow : J. Lowther, Esq. Lord G. L. Gower, W. Howard, - Esq. L. D!inda.s, Esq. Lord C. Somer,O, W. :N•tettih, Esq. F, Robinson i,sq. The Earl.d Yarmouth, Arthur tiouhion. Esq. Lord Palmerston, James Lowther, 11. Swan, Esq. • C. Yorke, E. D. Giddy, Esq. R. Wharton, Esq. Sir Wtkt. CURTIS presented Petitions against the Catholic Claims from several pirislies in this City. ' Lord Ithr.ToN inquired if these Petitions were signed in the time of service ? , Sir W. CURTIS wished he could answer the question, but he ; ifad not been present. Lord MILTON, from what he had heard, felt disposed to.complain that' the altar of religion was made a receptacle for political Petitions. These Petitions were ordered to liL on the table. Mr. Framty presented Petitions from Dom barton and Glasgow against the - East India Mo nopoly. Ordered to lie on the table. Mr. BUTT'ERWORTII presented a Petition from Aberystwith, ih Cardiganshire, against the Ca tholic 'Claims. Sir H. PARNELL presented a Petition from the Queen's County, in favour of the Catholic Claims. Ordered to lie. on the table. Lord KtaKWALL • preSented a similar Petition from Denbigh. Lord CASTLEREAGII presented a . Petition from the County of Down to the same erect. Ordered to he on 'the table. Mr. D. Ginny presented a Petition, fi-oin Bodruin, iti Cornwall, against the Catholic Ordered to lie on the table. Several other Petitions were presented, .and ordered to lie on the table, the particulars of which could not be beard. The following Members were ordered .to he discharged from► the custody of the Sedeant at Arths, on paying their fees.----Mr: Bouireric, W. Clive, Mr. Edw. Cook, Mr. Hanbury,Mr. C. W. Taylor, -and 14 r. J. Warton. LOUD MAYOR AND . COR.PORATION pp DUBLIN. The Slif.Al{.l.;it bad to acquaint the douse, that he had received a letter from the Lord Mayor of Dublin, respecting the manner in which he should 'present a I'ctition to the house. 4e read the letter to the House; it was signed A.B. King, Lord Mayor, and stated, that the 'Corporation of Dublin having voted a Petition on the subject of the Catholic Claims, he (the Lord Mayor) was deputed to present it at the Bar Of the two Houses, and requested permission to present it, at the Bar of 041-louse of Commons ; ut the-same time ex , pressing a hope, that this privilege would be con ceded; and that the Petition would be received in a manner analogous to that in which the flOuse receivedpetitions from the City of London. Mr. CiIIAI"PAINT dial not concur with the object of the Petitieur, but waiiankions to (19 every houour to. the City of ..Dublin; and therefore Moved, <<That the LordThyor'of•Dublin be :admitted to presenr the PetitiOn of • :the said City'at the . ILI-, of House.— SHAW - , of Dubiin;seconded the Motion: Mr. WYNNE, in 01)*tilir, to the motion, meant Tie dist'espeet the City of,Dublin;bUt , he 0196;4 it incumbent upon the House to goyerned by the preeedents they had laid down. This privilege had never been conceded to any Corpor4iim that of the City of London. It had never 1 , 4 e. n 7 claimed by the City of . Dublin, even when there Was an Irish Parliautent If this were'conceded, on any subject of importanc'e, the Lord Mayor of Dublin must he dispatched over here with the. Petition of the Corporationis, 'or .else it wohld ye wilt---" Ott, this is a snhjeet which they'd° not take Much intcrek, as they do not send the Lord Mayor over to present , it, as, they did When they petitioned Parliament on the Catliblie Claims." PEBLE bnped, that, undeh the particular circumstancea of the case, the House would be induced to accede to the Honoorable entietuan's propositions,--particularly as the Chief Magistrate of Dublin lead art tially arrived in town. The Cor poration of Dublin had no the motive in trans mitting the Petition, in the. manner they had done, than a 401" C, to give ,it eVery weight in their power; and he did think the House would be act ing too strictly, if they rejected this application; He Wished particularly to observe, that he was by no means indueid to accede to die Motion, on account 'of the nature or seutiments.of the Peti flan. lle was sure, in de; . 'iding this question, it was quite unnecessary to k:low what they were-- it , was sullicient to state; that request was ritade by the Corporation of the second City in them pire,. which it Was easy for the House to gratit,. and which wotild be received by those seeking it with every . proper acknoWledguienL Mr. TIERNEY objected to the motion . FrrzsERALD: spoke in favour of it, ' - He thought it a comollment which ought to be paid to the Qiiief Magistrate of the. seconl'Qity of the tnipire. Mr. Witt TB lipAD asked if they hint • enjoyed thii privilege when they hail i Parliament in Ireland Mr. W. FrrzOuttm.o could not find any proof that they had. - Lord CASTLEREAGH said, in the Irish Parlia ment no petition could be presented hut by the hands of a 'Member. This W 45 OM of their itd'ilding Orders. The House in the present instance was placed in some difficulty, but as he thought no par ticular consequence beyond the immediate con sequence could be apprehended from granting the request, he hop;cl it would be, granted in a spirit of conciliation and good humour. Mr. TIERNEY understood, in the Irish Parlia. matt they bad a standing Order, that tSo PAition . should be resented but by .a Member. He ap praentleil it was much the same, with one ex ception, that in favour of the City of London. The SPEAKER said, they had no standing order. on. the subject. The question waS always nut when on admitting the Lord Mayor or Sheriffs Of. London. It . was therefore optional with the House to admit them, or refuse admittance, and on one occasion in 1690, it had been their plea sure to refuse to receive them. Lord CASTLEREAGH, as a matter .of courtesy to tbe'Corporation of Dublin, wished its Chief Ma gistrate to be admitted to their Bar, as he had actually come to England for the purpose of pre senting it. Mr. TIERNEY recommended, that the present Petition should he put into some Member's bands to prs , sent, and that the house should delibe rately decide bow to act when the. next petition arrived. , The CHANCELLOR of the EriCHEQUER contend ed', that by receiving this,- they would not hind themselves to receive ail future Petitions in the same manner ; and therefore under the peculiar circumstances of the case, thought the request ought to he granted. Mr. PoicsoNßy differed from the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Ile thought if this Petition were read in the mduner proposed, they would bind themselves to receive all others in the sauce way. He saw nothing in this PetitiOn, to distinguish the particular case to justify their doing that which was not to, be made an universal rule. The CHA,NCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER wished it o he .received like the Petitions of the City of London, The question beinff nut on the particular case, Mr.'gROKER hoped the !notion ►voutld be acceded to, and that. Ireland would not be stamped, through Dublin, with a sensation of inferiority. After some further desultory conversation, Sir J. StlAw, adverting to the comparisons made be tween the Cities of London and Dublin, claimed the privilege of presenting their Petition at the Ilar of the House, as that to which the City of London had a right ; and he knew of no au thority that could refuse to admit those whom they sent. 'the SITAKER said, no One had a right to knock at their door, and enter their 1-fouse, but the Crown, who . was permitted by them to open their door. _ _ Sir J. SnAw felt he bad expressed himself . too strongly. He had only a wish to ciaitu the ancient privilege of the City of: London. • , Alderman Comnt could not go so fay as fhellim. 'ort. had gone, in claiming the privilege 13 ques tion as. a right. Mr. GRAT'rAN milde An addit;on to' his motion, with made it a, proposition for 't•e:ceivirig. the Lord Mayor " accordin to the wage observed in re ceiving a Petition from the City of London.' Mr. W. WY NNE again opposed the motion, burl considered it tohe wrong in the nouse tO give any, encouragement to the Miagist rate of a City to.leave his charge. Mr. Ptrt.E observed, that, by an'Act of Parlia ment of his present Majesty, in ease the Lord :. Mayor of Du4.4in was obliged to proceed to Eug-. land on Official business, lie ,was empowered to elect LI locum tenen.; from amongst those who had filled the office of Chief 144giktrate. • Sir W. Cnalls obllerved, that the Petition of the City 'of London were not ..presented by their Ma gistrates, but by the. Chief Officers of the Corpo ration. lie should be glad to pay any mark of re spect - to the City. of thiblin. Lord COCIIItANE moved, as an amendment, that the'lvOrds and the Lord Provost at Edinburgh.!' should be inserted after the name of the Lord Mayor aDublin: lle saw . no reason why both cities should not, he placed on the same footing 4 ThiS gave rise to some disentsiOn, in which Lord Castlereagh, _ Lord A. - .Hamilton, Mr. liatilurq, Mr. Tierney, and Mr. Ponsonhy. participated ; after Which the amendment . was negatived, and the original motion carried vithoot ft dIVISIOII. Mr. "WpurNtoitE was discharged from the cus tody of the Sedeant at Arms, upon payment of his fees. - • . _ Mr. D. GIDDY postiumed his motion on the sub ject of the Copy. right of Books till to-morrow se'nnigbt. PLIOVISIONS FOR itEGI.N r I Sir. FRANCIS Bunn; TT rose to make his.pro mised motion on this subject. He was sorry to be compelled to trespos upon the House, after the large call they had already bad upon their pa tience. 7 But the proposition he bad to make, lip pearetVto him to be so plain, so simple, so easy, and sh intelligible', that he rejoiced to sav it would "require fetv arguments to enforce, tkliti no lengthened eulogy to prevail on the House to adopt it., ,Re conceived , that it was, nevertheless, of the highest importance;. atiecting in every point viov conatitutional' principles of the country ; and involving the safety and interests of the Throne, as w(;11 as the legal intereitof the subject. 11c bad not brought it I:orwaTd with Out having repeatedly endeavoured to get other Alembers of that House, pop , ,essinß- more' weir:lit than hirnsell,•to undertake the task ;: and it ‘etild be recollected, that he Irld twice emlea- wowed to hare addresses voted to his Royal fligh tless the Prince Regent on the subject, though he bud been unable to procure either of them to be adopted. Finding length that the subject was not likely to be hi ought forward by any other person, he was compelled to execute the office himself, even with the small pretensions he had to the consideration of the House. It seemed ta him, that violent encrOachments had been made on the legal institutions of the country by the proceed ings in 1788. They were a great departure from the Constitution, and though it was not his wish to recur to any thing like personal allusion, or say any thing likely to beget acrimonious opposi, tion, he would say that those proceedings origi flitted in a viol en t faction at the time, to preserve themselves in office, without regard to the < Con stitution of the country, In the 'debates upon that question, it had, in his opinion, been justly maintained on One side, that when the Crowr t WPS incompetent to the discharge of its functions, the exere.se of the prerogative ought of course to devolve on the heir Apparent. On the other, it was held, that the Heir Apparent had no right at this kind more than any Qther subject. Strictly tvne ; for law on the point, an:i where re I there could he no riglit. But, (-I ovely pi, ' . Of afralOgV end. esxpedieney, that iine oegl.r. to;, e e e been followed e nnd the mote so, a; :Le ,e - tithed at the gloribes period of the Revelineoe. - - If this had been the ease, theywould not levee :eel Minister; exercising the regal - authority teee month. , ; ; but On the centeare, the ,order ('4'; , - verninent would have been at onee restored. Thh depaetnre fermi the Constitotion, however, W?7'3 justified on the pea of necessity. Now, be bed ever thought the exercise of tie. functions of the Crown were essential to the interests of the cone tr3L The prerogatives atteehed to it by the coln. Mon law were chiefly these:—that its , desceet should be hereditary, without election or inter - ference with the order of Snecession ; and thet it should never suffer snSpension. But in the in-: . stance to Which be had referred, these grente i nee - - - tildes had been departed 'from. The donee we;eld' :See, 'then; the. danger of departing from the.n'•in ciples on the plea of necessity. In 1810, the ter - •mer usurpation; which should haVe- served as a beacon to be avoided, was`taken is an ex' enple to be folloWed; They kne‘v that %iris Mujestv, fro in the state of.his mind, had been unable to fulfil the fenefions of •Royalty e how far Ministe:s had taken upon themseivesto exercise this autherity while in this situation, it , waS impossible 'for hien . to say ; but from the evidence of the Physicians, be had strip; grounds for saying that- they had acted in the name of theitiing, when- the King was personallyunfit to discharge the Royal duties. This was a second violent' departure from the Con stitut!on of the country, subversive of the prero gative of the Throne,. an&the rights of the side hject. The fiction or phantom, as ithad beeli deli- eel, by which this vas done, and the great Seat . applied to the non; nation by Parliathent of 1-4:;..! Executive Magistrimte of the country, was equal:: ly indefensible. Ile Wished the House to come to , a decision, and to provide for a' vacancy, while, though not likely to happen, might again happen', and compel them to a like' deviation frinn the Constitution. To preverrt this, and the plea eft necessity in.futurc, (a necessity Which, in his nion, never existed) Was his object., He wished to preveot that which he must condeum--..--proceed. ings - by which Parlinthent norninated to the regal office, and did still more, for they took upon theta' selves to restrain the prerogatives which the z)oio mon law attached to the Crown so much so a 3 to render the Prince unwilling to accept the re. , stricted office offered to him, to which he at last only gave his consent, as appeared by his letter, because he thought the evils of baying no Goverze ment at all would be greater than those of a con fined Government.' He bud stated that be had 4 reasonfor peculiarly calling on thelitiase to adopt the present Measure. He would,' however, leave if to Gentlenien"s own minds to suggest what .it was, and only , hint, that as the greatest evil that ever bactarisen to this country, grew out of ached ptiterd succession, so a disputed claim to the Re gency naight lead to evils equally to be deprecated- They were called on to guard against this, veld to secure the Minister of the day from subvertinet the Constitution under the plea of necessite. Ifi his motion were adopted, his view of the subject, and the measure lie Aotild have 'to propOse, would be to do this, but he nad so. worded hisairopesitioo. at notto tie them down to any specific form.- - -- From every reason suggested by analogy, it ape peared right that this matter sliould be, settie,t, and the' saute pro vieiens made for the case tit: the King's insanity to for a case of his natural ite:i It was an established principle, that . 'the t:,:eneet knew nothing' of infancy, or of any thing to ince pacitate it from discharging its trust fOr the bene fit of the people; and whenever any Incapaelte arose, it ought to be transmitted to a successor without interference. As this important case prcurred, he SOW no reason why the principle, l should not be extended to other •possihie contin gencies. It would be idle to notice many 6( the: reports to his supposed views in bringiogethis sub ject forwfglif Some had aCensed ofeloinfre it out of hostility to the Peinee Regent. Upon thef he had only to shy, that it had always 'been wish and endeavour to place the Throne on it safe and glorious basise—the affections' of the people at large. , . had .alWayi thought th;:ft hie Royal Highness lited beeneill treated, and en tertained the hope, that he rosSe4ed .a feeliee of a public : kind, in Considering his interne: exit in common with those Of, the nation, zinct wishing,to unite them together- He bad almiYl - ., hoped. that Uis Royal Highness loved the . prim pies *Web seated his Family on the Thronei:and by rtcting upon them would secure the affections of his people; and the veneration •of pesterity. Ii a still hlied so, and' on the authority of his Royal. Highness's own later to Mr. Pitt in 1765. This letter so fully spoke his own ideas, th:it hr could not resist reading . a passage of it to the 9 . " The Prinee hOwever, holding as he doe 3, that it it undoubted and fordamertfah principle of thin J 7 • 'that th.te powera and pre t - 47,ativci of the Crown 1.1;e:e, as a trust for the benefit of the People ; and , that they are sarred only as they are vecessary to tint pohe ;sit• lanoe of the Constitution, whieloenperience has proved to he the true security of the of the fazhji.-A, inu,t Inv."ed to oh-a:rye s that the plan of lotb!ic t ht.131)7:,, .tUditn;elT", 1 . -, thi4:‘ call , . for the c;,tinet', or stoaperr.:3oo of any one or doise c9.;eritial right iZ ti.;,.; • 1 prelim power, or its representative; or which cim erine.e. in consenting, that, in In termer*, iili Nreciot , ,t:Z. LW. made to soteertaio with how :Antal& a portion of piyANtr the, Executive Government of this: i;onntry ma 1.;, vied on." • It then'went on to state the mitchiel that won!ti ensue from such a scheme in mutilating the nye :rogatiye, and only to .put_an end to the state of tinlirel4 his /loyal flightless submitted 'to the e%- pertinent, to be tried in his persoo, with ht., ,W power the Executive could be carried on. Ijotoy tnnately ,he had since been Compelled to submit' to ti second, disrespeettal to him, and injuriont: the public. to prevent the recurrence of violations of the law, and the usurpation. of power by the two branches of the Legislature Con trary to 4tatute---0, prevent the counterfeit greit seal, by miserable chicanery, being applied to dti 'cuments not sanctioned by royal authority, helniA been impelled to bring forward his present propo sition. It was necessary 'Una . , the CroVni-shnuiti not be made the 1)0i1 of fileitiorL Ilsrthtluld there fore propose,. that the potters now exercised by the Prince Regent should, in case of his dem st.: before the Kiod, be vested in his royal tiaughter, 1' means by which i But, surely, it IA kr to CODIpaTISOII betlti, that of the prc o; `haul( b e well , re( lo' itauces the Veti I confidently assert y rote stalits were ~, d I, fora their s il eni c o at ''lliFtt effect were e i tio' - 'stir fellow stibj oaf s ' illeniselves,--The ,' Ilk tabl e , the ;; he iliOtoo of I, t.ti::•4l same effe ct , f Ce r r ' T deos, Rod otb 1414-street oil itlul Vders of tl e ro 1 ' 4t veli, ill Land( NI 10, 1 . The Earl of orP i t i , t k% from the 1 ,op zioard of kg•rietilt ' t iiiV , ek e the hrq.hises 11. 1 r t `- li4j, — 4l'. suen meat Titeri ' ihp uld seem meet eolt The Alargois ol t fror 4 h th. t rilerenall t i t 11'4 21c,eitY Of Aherd Ili ce,l 4titttive pi' iv i1e,0.1 t,,'; Ititt atimbe r to 1.11 o'l 4*k th 0 Et.it 'lllicki pteettl' 16 14()Iii ''' tb ~l' ing tllttEn A 1 Ita ,o. of ,„ e , - scoltd rt Intoirtnt 1 :11 ' nj°llloed tiil ' Ipfl,' i , .. i A O j t.. 11r . Wri of'' ' , qta u er:3 11 c oot c order t n s ,o '.. Orile ; a 1, ° ~, ~ ti t , Y Pel IN; :' tali of. ret WO , ',‘43 then, yet ! ~,, , ,,,,i),, ti 0.,,, ~,!ou*,.. t i,do . Art, \v it .,. sep3 , , .kilr e ~e t, s , . b; 01 kr, i' '; ,ai t, l i _ a . stleil '.. ('N) :ir c 'At ; Ili ''''' . i ~ )( Ms be il I.ol l ' ' The 8, 11, l'e (110,s sonieli iii,, ~.,rte;„ res idt l ,la Wiiie ) i 6 1 PP1); li ?retell,: ce.l ~. ...tit. „y, 4,, , l 't Pet ttif NI,. Av II 1 too , 'n' Clll isl C iC, fqw; the Lirl ' ~ ' e 61 Vi; ir '. - 4, ri t i:,11 be . tire. 1)1 hett, di ' it, ani 1 .'..0,,,,,, ' 710 i• Ici ' ', . 4 . 1 4, w kf t ;,_ tit t oll c on. .„).,.4 v. t o e . ~,E,,,:, di "I.(i i,' it. nr • 0 c . lya,(i 0 1 '. '.-• turt Y ' t AO sh li-"' f' f I hey w h ' ,0 , 4 ~, li r, ii. e! t ''eq e , . I I , , IP% av,f --- g' .0 * Aiil '43 Qf 1 .! . /t • ' S. , I t 11 • W . c C l k a bitantil , „ IPPIVal,di iretiOit• li 4 Nth. t eal') If ~e;` - ti.,,, 11 ,. II t 1 , 1 , ,, t aK hi/ ,;Iliti i t ~ ~,4 , N r. ,,,—. • „i t 'f , t vvll l '. '' (l u tli ~, i,, , ( 1 ..1 / ' 'kei , h '. AA t , ' 1 t e ' ty l l ' ' e u tE i E " u 'e wl ~: 4 ,4 Out f 0 anti I N ,J s r ' l ',l fi,,,lit el t 145 4 1 / tit 4g , tr 'et %,,, C , t. nriti 1,,,, 4,.. ~' C I 1 ) i!, , 'ld ti ye, ' i h 't Cii E L "i!le titit „ - $ 4 ti] - 1 . b e , I ' l r, t , o n „, ei 911 E3 ., , zit tft Celti ti t of t- :,,, , :tri 0 1, ' 8. n gittii. 1 , , 1 ir Av 1 1 ut: ely • I ~ t . Vqte, . 4i9k ill the li t ir I% but ' I A , fic ~,:_•.e,