The Sun. — London, England, 1802-05-08 00:00:00

otter Power in Europe. it Ut, the Hot. Gentleman, though he did not much insist upon it, had asserted that in this War we were the aggressors. He .would not repeat what he had said on that subject, but he would alledge, that by every party that had suc ceeded-in France, it had been acknowledged among them all that France had been the aggressor. The mode, in which it had been considered was obvious ly fallacious : he did not deny, - that in some of . the Provisional Executive Governments there might be some pet - ions,. desirous of avoiding a War with this Country. He was indeed convinced there were such persons, but all these persons thought, as well as all persons now think, in that Country, that die sririt cf a National Convention, in whom all e the ' pci ‘ wer resided, and not i n t h e P rov i s i ona l Execu tive, had determined upon . a War with this Coun try, and it was impossible : for. any Provisional Exe cutive in France, with such a disposition in the Convention, to prevent a War, or in any measure to .avert that calamity. - He felt no difficulty in saying there was_ no inconsistency in his conduct upon this subjett, no subsequent condua of his, in any share he had in the late Negotiation for Peace, had subjected him to the imputation of any change oh sentiment. The War arose from necessity, from the principleS that were prevalent in France previous to its commencement, disposed as Frlince manifest ed itself.to be, to receive 'the Seditious .of every country, publishing as it had, principles utterly sub. versive_ of all order, de s tru&i ve o f a ll p r o p e rty,, - of all moral obligation, of every thing that - was dear to man.; with such a Country, professing and pub. lishing such principles, it was impossible to be long at peace : the ,War was a calamity in such circurn; stance's, that was unavoidable : it therefore was not only difficult, but impossible for this Country to avoid. that calamity, without surrendering its own rights and independence and Without being accessary to t he ruin of every Power in Europe. ' But, the Hon. Gentleman asked, whether-the ground of argument, on Jacobin'. principles, does .not now exist in the same-force and degree against the' Government of /France, as it did when this Country first opposedit on that account ? ,To which he would answer, that Jacobin principles not only did not exist in the same fore& and degree; but, ir, the s way in which the Rm. Gentleman stated, that matter, they did not exist at all.. The Hon. Gentleman had asked, if Jacobin principles did not give birth to the present Government of France ? That was not the mode of considering the question ; 'it was not material. to consider_ what gave birth to the pre sent Government,—the question ; was to us, what were its- professions now ? And in that respect-, there has been a.c . omplete change in tile' Government , of 'France. The present, Government of France has published .to the world a recantation of every principle of Jacobinism, and of every other - principle from which -danger was apprehended, in . a manner as satiSfadory,-as far as profession could be such, as the most sanguine friend of the war, or the most decided enemy of Jacobin principles, could desire. .However he might regret the fate of the House of Bourbon, without Considering svheiher that House was likely to_ be restored or nor in the. course of the war,-yet if it- had been for il9thing4nore than a change of the Dynasty, the contest would not have been carried on ; but the Contest :here, was owing to the entire change of principles upon, which, the Government. had been earaietl on ; all principles of Established Govern ments had .heen.overturned„ and - it, would have ' been at . any time sufficient ground for other, Countries to adopt measur es f or the resistance of ; such principles, as being utterly- hostile to all Go- 1 Verurnent whatever, they being in their nature cal culated to_ overturn .all Constituted Authorities ; and they had been declared incapable Of maintaining peace and amity with other Powers, not because they were a, Republic, but because they were a Go. vernment, the like of .which never -before existed, on which no Republic even was. ever formed, pro ceeding upon a, system that was truly subversive of every maxim, and every rule of action that had hi therto been found to contribute to the happiness of Mankind. He might be asked, .however, .what he' thought of the recantation v,hich had been made-of those principles, and whether he thought they gave evidence of .a, recurrence to ancient principle? To which 2 - e answered, he was aware that whatever Would be the desire of persons in France, after such a conclusion, it would . be impossible for them to set up an establishment upon the best of models, for they must take their materials as they found them. In the mean time, he thought credit was due to, their profession, as far as it ought to be respeCted by Foreign Powers, for they had publicly asked,par_ don of God and Man, and done every thing they could to revert to the ,antient established principles of Government, and their measures, in every point he had been able to view them, had that tendency. thought it an important consideration. with refer.ence to. this Peace, or to any Peace that could be concluded, when some of the ob_ . . jedions which had been started to the Peace, were removed, and it was then a question, if no cre dit were to he given to these recantations, how far it would be prudent in this Country to•drive them again _to revolutionary measures, where they must abandon the system which they had now adopted, 'and proceed in the very same course which rendered them incapable of maintaining peace and amity with other Powers. He Was now come to that part of the argument in which the Hon.• Gentleman had asked, what period of the War it was in which we might not have had more advantageous terms of .Pt ace than the pre sent ? To which he again ~;,os. l vered, that he defied the Hon. Gentleman to Slicw any period -What e V er from the commeneen;ent of the W ar t o Jan. z 8 00 , in Which we had any chance whatever ofany Peace. The Hon. Gentleman had complained that no proposition came from us at any time for Peace, when we our.. selves, or our Allies, had been successfid ; that our attempts at negotia.ing were always in the hdur of Our distress. The Hon. Gentleman had forgotten that a proposition to negotiate been made by his Rt. Hoo. Friend, the late Chancellor of the Excite- quer, at Basle, which Was at a period when the Austrians hail been successful. He was not now stating, whether Government was right or wrong as to the terms which were insisted upon, but he' was stating it, in answer to the 9' bjedions of the Hon. Gentleman, tor thz. puiposs„of, Av i ving thin do Peace otAfti be 'made with kranceat that period.; anki it was not a question of terms, but of principle, which principle was, oa the part of France, to make, no Peace at all ; and he bad no difficulty in saying, that had there been no alteration in that principle, it would have been impossible for this Country to have succeeded in negoriating.in any manner whatever. He then took a view of the observations of the Honourable Geatleirnin On the subjea-of the Negotiation in rBOO, and maintained it was trot probable that we should have had better terms at that time than the .pre sent. The French being then in possession of va-, rious . places which he enumerated, Genoa, Malta, .Egypt,,SEC. and which they . afterwards lost by_ the fare of War ; and observed also that- Austria and Russia were at' that time wiliing to continue the Confederacy and to prosecute the War; and he con. tended there was at that time a chance of ipprov ing the condition of Europe by its continuance, and. therefore it was prudent .in us to decline the proposals ivhic`h were then / made, besides which, it was to be remembered that France had gone on in a ten years revolutionary career, and had ten Revo lutions in that time, so that there was no reliance to beplaced on the stability of its Government.--- Having stated this much upon the circumstance of the different Negotiations proposed at that period,be ing satisfied that the'VS T ar arose out of the moral effed of the French Revolution, that no human pru— dence.could have prevented it ; being .surethat from the commencement of the War to January l'i4oo, there never was an ,option given to this Country as to War or Peace ; he would admit that in January iBOO there was stated a different ground, but still it did not follow, that it might not have been prudent to prefer the chances of War to the chances of Peace'. He shnuld now come, in its order, to consider, the conduEt of the War ; but before he did that, he would say a few words on the observations which the Honourable Gentleman had made on the Definitive Treaty of Peace. He would not - go at large into the arguments upon that aubjed, partly because it did not ; necessarily form a part of the real question .now before the House, and partly because there would soon .be afforded another op. portunityof discussing . that topic. He certainly felt that, . upon that subjeet,, there was not the satisface tion, or the security to-'Europe that could have been wished, or might have been once expeaed ; but it did not thence follow, that any blame was - imputable to the late Ministers for their condua in the management. of the War ; nor did •it follow, there, was any blame imputable to. the present Mi nisters for the conclusion of Peace. The question of War orPeace, could o n ly be d ec id e d by l oo ki ng at the alternative of Peace or War, by looking at the advantages and disadvantages of both, for there were advantages and disadVantages to both, and making achoice between them n and he did think, that whatever might be the security of Europe at this time, there was, at the time of making Peace, no chance whatever of Europe being placed in a better stare of security, by 'this Country refusing to make Peace. He thought the Peace, under all crrcumstan ces, wise, not only ;or our own security, but for the security of the rest of Europe ; for it was the iii tersst of all Europe, that we• should husband our resources and keep ourselves entire, and not to waste our strength, upon that pursuit 'which, under all circumstances of the contest, was not likely to be very useful, either to Great Britain or the rest of Europe in general. He thought the state' of Eu rope was not - so secure as could have been desired ; but when he came to think of the advantages and dis advantages of Peace and War, and compared them together, there was not much room for-doubt re maining with - him as. to,the course which this Coun try. ought to pursue. He . was, however, willing to admit tthere was uncertainty in all opinions re_ spewing future events—human opinions of the tune, deserved no better title than conjeaute ; the best formed of them frequently turned out- to be ill founded. Hd had seen, when Peace was talked'of - as bleasing likely to be enjoyed for many years, War !)roke out ola-sudden. And when States were threat ened with- a long continuance of the .calamity of War, Peace was brought -about ; and he had read in history, of instances, when War was -thought to be inevitable, a long and uninterrupted Peace wa s enjoyed. He was not stating -thiseby• way of en. deavour to diminish the comfort of the prospect -of security to a Nation for the continuance of peace, nor to say that the thing was not always-matter of great consideration. On the-contrary,-he thought it a thing which we could never forget, and it was an °Ned which we ought never to lose / sight of in the consideration of Peace and War. The use-which he intended to make of it was, only to remind the House how very inconclusive all reasoning of this kind must in its nature be. Now, -as : to the other part of the observations of the Hon. Gentleman, on what he had said on the relative or comparative si tuation of this Country and France,he would not enter into itate.;aege at present. He was prepared however, to maintain, that-there never wasa period inavhich the IVlaritime and Commercial strength,- the. Colonial strength of Great Britain, when compared with- that of France, was so great as it was at the present mo ment ; nor was there ever a periodin the history of the two Countries, when the means of increasing all these Powers were in so advantageous a condi tion to Great Britain, and Sq much superior to that of France, as at the present moment. This he only asserted now, professing, as he felt, a readiness to argue it hereafter. The Hon.. Gentleman had then gone into the conduit of the War, and he had enu_ me rated what he considered failures, and certainly some events' deserved that name, for certain Expe ditions had failed of their intended obje&s, in the course of the present War. That they had done so, neither he nor the Hon. Baronet, who had spoken on the same • side (Sir H. MLLDMAY), attempted to deny : but when Expeditions were undertaken, they must be so under considerations of success and of failure; for among the wisest Expeditions that were ever yet attempted, howeve.t skilfully they may have been devised, whatever knowledge, or whatever va lour there may have been found in the Officers who were to execute them, and whatever readineis there may have been in .the Troops to obey orders, still there must be some, nay many failure;; but he would say, that as far as regarded the separate conduct . of this . Country, there never was a War which was more eminer* successful; there never was a War' in whichmore was acquired by us,---and what was acquired, contributed more to the credit Of_thc trakittt of our-Fleets and Armies.; or gave a better, proof of. wisdoin in Council' than the present ,War exhibited.—He believed that this was the first War in which Aio British Colony had been wrested from the British Crown—where we were so triumphant in the West and in the East,—in the Mediterranean every quarter where the British force had been separately employed—in all which the British force had been eminently, and in every instance successful ; and he contended it was impossible for the House to consider of these things, without not only admir ing the skill and valour of the British Force, bet with out also paying a tribute of praise to the wisdorn of the council by which they were devised. To say, that there had been no failure in any plan, Was/What he had no intention to: do—No man ever could as sert such tithing of any War ; still less was it to be expeded in 'this War, which was, on many _ac counts, the most extraordinary War the world ever saw—But what he insisted upon. was this, That if we looked at the result of the efforts of British Force, when separately exerted, there never was a War so brilliant as this had been to Great Britain. As to the other Powers, he should not at present say much ; but if the condua of any Administra tion was to be tried in the course of a great War, it was not fair to try them on those exertions which they had not the whole condua of themselves, but in 'hich their efforts were in con . innaion with others, and where, from the very nature of the thing, they' 'had only a subordinate_, part to perform : and yet, it would appear, that even in this view of the mat ter, if other Powers had been as true to themselves, as we had been to ourselves and to them, - there would have been less failure than there had been, and no fault was to be imputed to the Government of this Country on that account. The Hon. Gen_ tleman had adverted to the financial state of the Country in the course of ..the present Wid, and to the conduit of his Right Hon. Friend, in that part of the War in which he sholild have expefted he would have !net with the approbation of every man in this Country, that of adhering to the system which had been adopted for the reduaion of the National Debt, The Hon: Gentleman had said, that by this War, the National Debt had been doubled—that might be true; but AN National Debt had been doubled by every War since the *Revolution, But when the nature of that Debt, 'and of the Taxes laid on, was considered, there would be found no blame imputable to his Right Hon. Friend ; unless they could shew tha t th e W ar cou ld h ave been con cluded with less expence than it had been; on the con,. trary, he considered this a proof of the merit of his Right Hon. Friend, not because the debt was so great, tlyiki was matter of regret to him and to every body, but because the burthens 'to support this debt. had been so laid on, as t o aired in so.slight a degree only, the comtnerce, the -.prosperity, the comfot t, - and. the _domestic happiness of the people of this country. He did not mean to say that burthens ,were imposed without affeCting, in some degree the domestic hap.:' piness of the people of the Country, that would be impossible, but he said they had been laid in such a manner, as that no person beforehand could have conceived to be possible, and for which reason he would undertake to say his Right Hon. Friend de_ served praise instead of censore, upon this occasion. It should never' be' forgotten, that there was a pro digious difference between this Country and France; he had indeed always thought there was a great dif ference between a country ailing under a Revolu tionary Government, and One that aced . upon regular and established principles ; 'and that in a con test, the advantage, in the way of finance, was greatly in favour of that country which wad aaing, under a revolutionary government, while the con test lasted ; because a revolutionary government had no rules to check its career in the way of property,' they laid hold of it wherever they found it ; whereas a regular government must regard property as sa cred, and would touch only according to the rules of Jaw ; and in doing - this, and at the same time pay ing large sums sufficient to support such a contest, without materially affeaing the happiness of ,the community, was a task which required very great and very rare talents. It was indeed that wherein the excellence of a Minister chiefly consisted. His Right Honourable Friend had done this, and for which his 'talents must be admired, and the manner in which he had exerted himself was a fit objeft of praise. With regard to that part of -the Ho nourable Gentleman's speech which related to the Sinking Fund, he confessed himself to be surprized that heshould have endeavoured to'detraft from the merit of his Right Hon. Friend in that particular. The plan for that purpose was wise, but it. was not the wisdom of the plan that !testi much admired, although that was great, as the determination to persevere in it under all the circumstances of the most extraordinary War, which was indeed an ad mirable perseverance. -If this plan had been adopted soon after the period when our National Debt commenced, and persevered in as his Right Hon. Friend had done in this, we should at the comrnence ment of each War have had little or no Debt upon our hands. Let Gentlemen consider what was the situation of this Cowl- - try . arthe American War, how we had not only a Debt in creasing, without hope of fedudion, but which of itself tended to diminish our capacity to bear our other burthens, and was the' subjed .of observation in 'other Countries who wished to see our prosperity diminished ; .but his Right Hon - . Friend had the merit of adopting, and the still greater merit of adhering to the system by which the whole Debt now standing against us, will be annihilated in half the time it had been accumulating, from its commence ment to the present time. This, under all the circumstances of the last most extraordinary War, he considered as very -extraordinary merit in his Right Honourable Friend.— There were some other points on which it was impossible for him not to say a few words, because they were points, the consideration of which gave a strong inducement to him to agree to the Motion made by his Noble Friend ; he meant chiefly the means adopted for the internal security df this Country.—Now, whether the War was necessary or not, was a question which he need not now argue, it had been often decided by that - House; arid he believed that at this moment, not nine-tenths of that House, but also of this Country, were not only,of opinion, that the War was just an4necessary, but also that the internal 'Peaee of the Country would not have been preserved, nor could we have been able to contend with the difficulties which . the French Revolution imposed on us, it' these measures had not 'been adopted. No man regretted those measures, or rather the necessity of them, more than - he did, for he - should always regret the ne cessity of laying any restriction on Liberty as it had been re cognised by our anctent Constitution ; but it was the praeti- . cal excellence of our Constit u tio n , th a t it h a d t h e m eans o f applying temperate remedies for evils as they arose, and - that was one reason why we had in reality so much liberty irtge neral. A country which did not possess the power of mak ing temporary restraints on Liberty, it was impossible to have much of it at any time, because whenever a State be came endangered, by the excess of - Liberty, withoul the means of. checkhrg that excess,' such a State must be over turned ; 'but a.poWer of checking it on an emergency enabled `us to have Liberty to its utmost extent at other periods.-- It was ovvit% to this, that provision had been made' to check. ties irit of raeobinisrli in this Country ; "r 4 gnci ave due encouragement to these 14116 were of sound Prj 'pies, for they saw they were .protected. The elle- 1.5 were visible last year • a year ofscarcity „with many c' r eiate , but which to,shew the . general loyalty of the p e n,Pff, olthis . country ; and if the laws which had been enacted val uals, stances of caiairnity I.;esides, which be need not . enunl e check the spirit of acObinisii.; were severe on ale win th e se they deserved it, and the mass of rn Laws as . protettion to the Loyalty of the People , E d t hen preservation of their Constitution. The Noble Lor nt . 2 ,_ proceeded to take a view of the Union 'between Great and Ireland;and Made many excellent observations 01 great event, which . made an important feature, be trend: of 'the Administration , - of his Right Honourable n : . and for which he deserved the highest cornmendatwit/hieA which had already produced many good. erects, but ~x d auk Ind considered d the posterity would regard with admiration, as t e nishment' s his gratitude to its authors. Under -these eireultlsla nce u ty Lordship said, he himself Called upon by a sense of d or " .04 to agree to the A men d m ent proposed by, his Noble a Motion which did not originate with hinl„-bn-t cvltuh made necessary by the Speech of another gun. -vas call and he thought the House, for its own consiSt&i - e)'; ed upon to agree to this Zmendinent of his Noble t 7 riend • 'Mr. POLE supported the Amendment. • itii" Mr: FOX, in a speech of great length, entere.d iOt o a mite - investigation of the conduclof the late Admirlist"T at e he paid some very high coroplimentsto.thetalents of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, but' as he shit retained his r o he titer opinion of. the measures of the late Administratiotl! Could not consent to give them thanks for that coodutt", of which he had always disapproved. He then proceed e ' s f argue at considerable length upon the state of the Einar' s c f,ifh the Country, and particularly upon the Income ax , `"1 to he condemned in very strong terms.—tie then advert.% Genticina„,. those Bills, which - he considered es infringing, the liberlYbui the Subject, and contended that they were net called t° ,, r v ere the state of the Country, because the dan i ger which th e y ve ry trfeant to meet was, if not entirely imaginary, at d le as „ t , s ion much exaggerated. He declined enter i ng into a ic eo o.• respelling Ireland, but he telt t oo M uc h horror at 0% t ook dud of both parties during the unhappy struggle whiic;sob place in that Country, to speak with temper UFO, i er °o b t y fo lt t . he H ori e g c i o n n al cl is u i d o e t d io w n, it n h o s r lt r in t g i , ze th A a m t h en e d w in o en ul t d p l o l p tl ; c .d the Noble Lord. Lord Br Loa Ave and Mr. WI LBER FOR C S eXPlain ed. h Of The CH4Ar4LLOR the EXCHEQUER, a SP eeC ..,atit great ability, replied to Mr. Fox (VI e la men t that our ~"00 of room prevents us front giving his Speech in detail.] said he should give his most decid e d su pport to the A" len n T e jt mehit of his Noble friend, and then proceeded, in a -fen eloquent and animated manner, to comment upon the sP oat i did talents and great services o f th e Ri g h t Hon. Gentleiod who was the object of the Motion before the . Houma' pf who, he said, was not dismissed, but" had resigned ""„): otIT &T.. He admitted, that during the late War, some r t i l eY Expeditions had failed, but contended, that in gelle,'A2lere°l - been attended with success. It was not by thei . ",,; a tion one or two Expeditions, that the Condud of Adrill."`„ , ar. -- ' was to be decided, but by the whole Condud of the the Even in that War, which was su pp ose d to have most successful ever carriedoo by this Country, Ina''„ia - ExPeditions failed, and the talents o f t h ese who that War were never called in question. i 5 Mr. If. SMITH Said, that in 1796, when there ot Vote' of Approbation on the conduct of the Chancellnr.ty, the Exchequer,, it was preceded by a ComMittee 1 ;1 '1 , 1 ' 4 Lord .GLENRERk le said, that the Committee o t . 11 did - not necessarily precede the Vote of Approbation. 0, Mr. CJILCRAFT said, he thought ierkliighly of the Qn,, t dud ofthelate Chancellor of the Exchequer, but he OOP this Vote of Approbation was too g enera l . on - Mr. FOSTER said, that if the An ten d me rit had Igo c War' fined to incasures.of the - late Ministers relative to the t i l er he would haVe supported it ; but it embraced rnenY objects, particularly the Union with Ireland, whic aced could not praise Ministers for,beca= be had always 0P P ° this Measnre, though, as it W 45 now irrevocahlY six tiff did not think it rii-ht to enter into arty argumennTi o the colidod'he luid'aclopted when that Measure was in ago -tion, because the discussion of that subjea might be pig' (Waive pt Much ntisehicf but could not be attend P'` - • any good Consequence& a did ferenec of opinion had taken place relative to a Lora CAS "I 1. 1.4 EACH tho),;girt it unfair, that point with the late Ministers, that therefore the /.. I .n r • e d• tieman should refuse to thank them. for having Country from danger. ostta and Lord Br I.cai.v severally exPl a jr,,ton t „ Mr...,TxritrieY thought Motion of the Ne u 4, o islek would; in its, e.tted; either take the part of the late Ma"- I,gainst the or be an intzlied cen,s,sure, upf.4 l nstY for dismissing hint. • - - . ro• The ATTOitNEY-GiNE,R.AL observed, that t he.? _the Noble Lord was confined to the condud of the l a . t .' o r l i4 flusters during the War, and could by . rio possible reat'ionaill be made to bear the inference drawn by the Hon• ~,t tl lO (Mi. TURN '1 • The Strangejs were thett ordered to withdraw House continued in"debate for half an hour afierwal ' c is ia o tiol? A Division at length took place on the original ' -when the numbers were , "Xj t • Against it - 2.24 s , 11 1 : ' kW' The Amendments of Lord 13E Loa.% 1,-,E and Sir r 'vo s c: iteLau i,ltt.roun,v were Then withdrawn and divided into "' ' vs's P a Gen' parate Motions i when there appeared on Lord I3Al• ° Motion, , . • , For it - iaz • • - • • M , jortty 17.0-, , Against - ' On Sir }lt rca Y Mt LOMA X'S M911.0n there w ere ' For it - 211 • 0. • • • Majority 1 Against - sz „ • • A., About Six;o'Clock in the Merning . the Llousez•wou • . • DA . THE ANN' IVERSARY of the Big I."' nom* .of the Right Honourable - memorated ou Friday the -25th of May. • Barl•Spencer in the Chair. • • • Stewards. ' • MarquiS of WOrcester, •W. Egerton, rici t Earl of Euston ' W. R. Cartwright , Earl Temple " Hans Sloane, Esq' Viscount Morpeth C. R. Ellis, t. 5 • 4 1^ • Lord G. Levison COwer E. W. lobtle, Esq• . Sir W. Lavvther, Bart. R. Ellisbn, Esq• Sir H. Mildmay, Bart. Lt. Gen. Egerton.. Sir R. Vaugl4an, Bart. S. Thornton, Esq• Sir 1. Wrottesly, Bart, W. Manning, E SC I . Sit S. Stuart, ,Bart. T. Raikes . , Esq. Sir R. Peele, Bart. N. B. Frencii,. ll- . W. Dickenson; Esq . . J. Turner, Esq• „ I. Pane, Esq.' It Stunner, • Francis Gregor, Esq. J. Dovrne, Esq• f Tickets at one Guinea,each, to be had.at the Bar o don Tavern'. ' • Dinner on Table at Five o'Cloek. THE SUN-. • ? SOLE:VI QUIS DICF:RE FALSUM AUD• LONDON, MAY 8, I S°l* . . 10' • Th l e Ve S t p hi ani f s o lf e Spain. A Corvette sailed on the zSth ult. for Arnorit",,,elo. Fleetnoon rseacieleidvedfrortnrenßchrePstapoenrstg t i b s e t a t l.,s h at, : i fori A Protest has been published at Berne . road' d i , :l l e O til ' MeArbers of the Senate, against the proceedings- th titg of — April. „ ni Neither Mr. PITT nor Mr. DUNDAS were present House of Commons last, night. ' An Especial Court ;as held 'esterday at 6 " - -e svillc _,,., polc-, consider of an Address to Hs s IVI/A 1 JEsTv on Imi.. I was unanimously agreed to. , f by I P ' s Yesterday the 42c1 R eg i men t was revientesse MAJESTY on Ashford Common. Their - Royal 1F0.04,..Lt: the PRINCE of WAIEs, the DUNES of Yoar -, .... e r of --. LAND, KENT, and CAMBRIDGE, and a great nuinv the new Lac: neral Oflicers, Were presents , to coli 6ide i r E hotil a iir 5.- was unanimously agreed, that a Memorial shpuld tented to the Treasury, requesting that no be made from the established custom, of a T ° reign Post in the week. d e part pay , s fO - Fortheui&r!ns(l a M Y' " ij s ' I,'%eq3prill,'" PRICE OF sTocKs, mis -DAY AT• TEL O'CLOCK. 75a i Omniurn - - ondon: P;nted by 13. WIVIILLi N A0 0 ` .1. 4 ( . : c o .it vent- - Garden) • and Published by WILLIA m No . 1 14 , "I'S Of 1 - 14se-terry-road , Wvst in i ns ter), at Striutd. Consojs. —7 _ - -