The Sun. — London, England, 1862-07-17 00:00:00

711 E BOUHE.R BANQUET. A very magnificent entertainment was given last evening, at Willis's Rooms, St. James's, to M. Rouher, the French Minister of Commerce, which was attended by about 150 members of the House of Commons, amongst whom were Mr. Milner Gibson, Sir G. C. Lewis, Mr. Cobden, Baron L. Rothsehiid, Lord Henry Lennox, Mr. Liddell, Sir David Dundas, Alderman Salomons, Sir Robert Clifton, Mr. J. C. Ewart, &c. Mr. Milner Gibson presided, and on his right was Vile guest of the evening, M. Rouher ; and on his left, M. Michel Chevalier and M. Dufour. A sumptuous entertainment was placed upon the table, and the wines were of the most recherche and costly kind, a different wine being served with every course. At the head of the bill of fare the following intimation appeared—" It is hoped that the order laid down may be adhered to, and each dish partaken of with its particular wine, fruit, and vegetable." The wines that were successively served with each course were Cham pagne, Rndesheimer, Moselle, Sauterne, Claret, Hermitage, Romanee, Chateau Yquem, Tokay, and Vin de Constance. At the dessert the Chairman proposed " The Queen, coupled with the name of the Prince of Wales He then proposed "The Emperor of the French," and in doing so said that for nearly half a century the relations between England and France had been, on the whole, of the most friendly de scription, but at no period during that time had those relations been in a more satisfactory condi tion than at the present moment. The monarch who ruled over France was animated by the most friendly sentiments to this country. The animosi ties which prevailed at a former epoch had been softened and subdued by the lapse of time and the enlightened policy of giving greater freedom to commercial intercourse between France and Eng land proposed by the Emperor of the French, and promptly and joyfully acceded to by the Govern. ment of the Queen, must tend to draw still closer those ties of amity which bound the two nations together. He proposed to them to drink with cor diality to " The Health and Long Life to the Em peror of the French." (Loud cheers.) The toast having been duly honoured, The CHAIRMAN proposed " The Health of our Distinguished Guest." (Great cheering.) They were assembled to do him honour and to give him a hearty welcome. Perhaps there was no instance in our history in which a large number of mem bers of Parliament had invited to a banquet a Minister of State of a Foreign Govern ment. This fact was significant of some thing. We were a nation above all others re markable for being the slaves of precedent, and when we stepped out of the beaten track we meant by that to signify something unusual. They desired on that occasion to express their approval of the commercial treaty between France and Eng land, and to express the strong feelings which they entertained of the importance it was to the happi ness of the people of both countries that the two peoples should be bound by the ties of amity— (cheers) —and they wished also to express their recognition of the services which M. Rouher had rendered to the cause—the great cause—of com mercial freedom. (Cheers.) It was he who had carried out in Paris the details of the treaty, and had effected those supplementary conventions which were within the spirit of the original agreement. He had had to encounter the jealousies and pre judices of interested persons, but spite of them the treaty had been a great success—and in the next returns of the Board of Trade it would be seen that there were only two countries standing higher with regard to our exports than France. He concluded by proposing M. Rouher, and the toast was received with great enthusiasm. M. ROIIHER spoke in French, and was received with prolonged cheering. He said,—Never before have I so keenly regretted as I now do my ignor ance of the English language, for community of ideas, impressions, and sentiments is never complete unless they are conveyed in the same language. I wish I could express to you in your own tongue the emotion and the gratitude I feel at the signal honour done to me this day by the representatives of that House of Commons whose debates may be said to occupy the minds of the whole world. It is not without a kind of astonishment that I find my self in the midst of se many statesmen, practised veterans in public affairs, renowned for their great oratorical conflicts and the eminent services they have rendered to their country, and whose praises rush to my grateful lips. (Loud cheers.) A just ap praisement of myself counselled me to decline this testimony of sympathy, but this important occasion was designed to pay homage to the great principle of civilisation which dictated the treaty of com merce of 1860. (Great cheering.) My scruples were overcome, and my presence amongst you was the fulfilment of a duty. This act will occupy an important place in the history of the two nations. (Cheers.) Permit me briefly to recount the ob stacles which opposed its negotiation, and the motives which determined its realisation, the results obtained up to this day, and the legitimate hopes to which its execution must give rise. In doing so I shall at the same time be able to reduce to its modest proportions my participation in this inter national work. (Loud cheers.) Commercial liberty had eloquent defenders in France in the eighteenth century. The barbarous theories of isolation, those barriers against the intercourse of nations, were victoriously attacked. (Cheers.) A great Minister, Turgot, made his convictions triumph in the eco nomic acts of the Gover nment _ y treaty of 1786, the existence of which was so short, and yet so ca lumniated, was inspired by those liberal tenden cies. The commercial legislation of 1792 drew most of its resolutions from the same source; the de crees which soon repudiated those measures of pro gress did not pretend to create a new system. They were weapons of war forged for those gigantic con flicts which marked the end of the last and the be ginning of the present century. (Cheers.) Why were the traditions of Turgot neglected after the return of Peace; why was the road deserted that had already been opened, and the science of the 'circulation of wealth suffered to fall again into obli vion after the light lavished on it by the genius of Adam Smith? (Cheers.) Did the backward legisla tion of other nations exercise an unhappy influence over ours ? I cannot tell. To my thinking the commercial laws of the Restoration were I determined by considerations of political economy, was tormented b y the idea, not reconstituting the territo devoid of pr es tige, of fictitious elevation of which had been crushed rial aristocracy by the The French revolution. the of the soil, that flagrant -violation of all the products -violation of the rights of the. mass of the People, Imo that direct cause of general p.. peered to it a precious eleraen t 0f success. . i mportation o f bitant duties were imposed on the ce reals and of all articles of food. F r ench industry ferred to obtain ought to have protested , but it pre . ntenance as the price of its adhesion the blind ma' of all those prohibitions which prevented the Irn por t a tion of manufactured produce. (Che ers.) The government of July manifested at intervals so me tendencies towards enfranchisement, but the bur den was too heavy to lift. Its timid e ff orts were destined to remain without effect. The political and electoral organisation of the country placed power in the hands of those who were directly in lerested in the restrictive system. IL nce for many yeers, thanks to the co-operation or the weakness of government, to the coalition of the adroit, and to the credulity and indifference of almost the whole public, prohibitionist views had become sovereign, and exercised that-power with that in tolerance which is the attribute of an illegitimate authority. (Cheers.) If anv ray of light pierced t hose artificial combinations it was extinguished w ith as much eagerness as is shown in extinguish ing' a conflagration. If an economist of matured con fictions had the courage to raise his voice he was attacked with indignation. He was but a Utopia or a traitor; he Wanted to sacrifice the in dustry of the country to the cupidity of England. ) To these economic (Cheers, prejudices and ter r ^ po litical tertained wer e superadded Iry passions and anim ositie s which im sse' pro 'dent min ds nu n so easily excite between two pow erful nations, each of w itself. (Cheers.) How werehi which is justly p r oud such obstacles to be >~~~ .~ ~ ... ~ ~..d_~a-..1w~ encountered, obstacles accumulated by selfish in terests, but consolidated by time and general indif ference. What reason was there not to dread the unpopularity that would attend that courageous reaction against inveterate errors ? How eagerly would hostile minorities misreprese t the projects of the French Government, accuse it of weakness and calumniate its honest intentions. I am not afraid, therefore, to confess that when Mr. Cobden, supported by the powerful aid of my hon. friend M. Michel Chevalier—(cheers)—laid before my Sove reign the expression of his profound convictions and his vast experience he appeared to be under taking the defence of a desperate cause. The par tisans of prohibition, intoxicated by some secondary successes, had adroitly taken possession of the avenues of authority, and believed the citadel im pregnable. But this was to confess a doubt of the superior views of the great man to whom the des tinies of France are confided and of the cause of truth. Now the eminent member for Rochdale had learned in the long conflicts which have distin guished him that truth, like prayer, if it sometimes marches slowly, yet never fails to arrive at the goal. The Sovereign who, in his period of solitary prepa ration for the high mission which he fulfils to-day had been an attentive witness of your economic re volution, and of the development of prosperity and greatness which had been its fruit, knew all the fecundity of that great law of exchanges which Sully, in his conversations with his King, called a law of Providence. The Emperor had meditated on those salutary doctrines of competition which for the good of all, and especially of the least favoured parties, kindles courage, exalts the faculties, in creases to a tenfold degree the effective powers, and summons at need genius in its aid—he called to mind those noble words pronounced by one of your great statesmen, Sir R. Peel, cs I hope that my name will one day be blessed in the poor man's cottage." And so he disdained that ep h e mera l authority with which priviliged classes surround thrones, that he might await that popularity which time developes and which posterity consecrates. (Reiterated cheers.) Uninfluenced by any other considerations than those of public good, he did not hesitate to take upon himself the direct personal responsibility of that reform which had cost the statesmen of Great Britaiia ten years of toil and conflict, and in doing so he justly estimated his I own strength and the affection of his people ; for, after a moment of astonishment and uneasiness, the phalanxes of French industry began to range them selves with confidence under the new flag he raised. (Cheers.) As for the puerile charge of weak sub servience to a foreign nation, he well knew that all —and you, gentlemen, before all others—would see in this treaty only a pledge loyally given to an alliance necessary for the peace of the world — (loud cheers)—a fresh guarantee offered to civilisa tion. (Renewed cheers.) Such were the obstacles, such were the motives, which caused the signature of France to be affixed to the commercial treaty of 1860. That treaty had to encounter stubborn ad versaries in the House of Commons, but placed under the high protection of Mr. Cobden, defended by the incontestable experience of the honourable president of this banquet, sustained by the engaging eloquence and powerful reasoning of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, it was approved by Parliament. (Cheers.) If I am not mistaken, it now meets among you with nothing but unanimous adhesion, since this entertainment is offered to me by the rspresentatives of all political shades. And now, if I have not wearied out your kind attention, allow me to mention some of the results obtained by the treaty in France. The first, which I name with sincere delight, and with a pride for my country which you will pardon, is, in spite of some bitter recriminations, the resolute and courageous attitude of French industry on the morrow after the facts were accomplished. Dazzled for a moment by those new and unexpected horizons, our indus trial population soon regarded them with calmness and serenity ; casting aside antiquated processes and material, they have demanded from mechanic art its most perfect machines, from science its most novel applications and boldest methods. They have flung themselves into the conflict with confidence and vigour, inspired by that profound idea of Roger Bacon—" The youngest are the oldest, they profit by the experience of their predecessors." What a grand and noble spectacle is that of the application of all the living forces, all the intellectual faculties of man to those fruitful struggles which issue in public wealth and prosperity. (Cheers.) And what more striking proof can there be of the benefits flowing from the treaty of commerce. Without it would not those activities, that productive power which are destined rapidly to increase the well being of the nations, would they not have remained inert and dormant like those precious sources, ne glected or unperceived, which flow unproductively into subterraneous lakes. This transformation of the economic ideas of French industry has just re ceived its ratification. Your august Sovereign, plunged in sorrow by the premature loss of a Prince not less eminent for his high capacity than for his illustrious rank, and inconsolable, notwithstanding the pious sympathy tendered to her by Great Britain and Europe, was pleased, almost as a hom age to him who was no more, to open the great arena of the Exhibition to the industry of the world. Disdaining the policy of abstention recommended to some by precept and example, our manufacturers flocked to it with eagerness, and have made their rivals judges of their efforts and their progress. Certainly they have admired the successes obtained by English industry under the incentive of liberty, but with feelings of noble emulation, not of narrow I jealousy—(cheers)—and with that religious convic tion which God everywhere reserves for the activity and labour of his least favoured children. (Great cheers_) The second result which I have to state is, that in spite of the recent date of our commer cial reports there has been a reciprocal and profit able development of exchanges between the two countries—a development which has mitigated the painful perturbations caused by the world's com merce by that fratricidal conflict which is raging beyond the Atlantic. Gentlemen, I have not yet sufficiently indicated the most striking feature of 1 the convention of 1860. That act was not merely a commercial regulation between two countries. It was the proclamation in the name of two great na tions of the principles of free trade—(great cheer ing)—of which you have been the leaders, and which are destined to penetrate all legislations and to stimulate the activity of all peoples. Already the public authorities in France, following the ini tiative of the chief of the state, have broken through our old legislation on cereals and raw materials, France yesterday signed treaties of commerce with Belgium and the Zollverein. (Cheers.) To-morrow she will sign that which she is negotiating with Italy. (Immense cheering.) The banner of econo mic reform will thus continue its triumphal march. Those exchanges which we see growing in extent, t hose relations multiplying in number, those inte rests that are becoming intermingled and mutually , ide n ti identified, augmented wealth that is increasing among na tions,its gmenthd welfare of the masses which is esteem day renders o f political inevitablevilieh s prings sequence, the high reciprocal (cheers) are not all the se for a cheers.) Wings from relations which every more tt frequent, the extinction durable peace between tb Are they not sure _ and ancient animosities things so many firm bases e nations ? (Renewed without reaction of progress reaction ? (Loud Ai l , gentlemen, let cheers) '4% not disturb these onies without convulsion, and by our faults a n d o ,lr wayward nascent harm a respon sibilityand man. (Cheers.) / impulses ; let us never assume so terrible Propose, emotion of a soul profound' with all the emoa alliance of the g • - - Y eon - before God British (Loud and long continued and the French nation. con vinced, a toast to the close cheering.) had called up on Mr COBDEN said the president M. Mull er him to reply t o th e toast w i t h which had concluded. H e h a d the honour and pleasure of acting with M. R ou h er for a whole twe lvemonth in ar ranging the detail s o f th e treaty, an d he should not be doing justice to his own convictions i f he did not take this first opportunity in public, and in the presence 'Allis late colleag ue , M. Rouher, of beari n g his testimony to the great services M. Rouher had rendered to the cause of commercial freed om. Until this moment there had not been an oppor- i I i tunity of M. Rouher speaking to Europe and the THE SUN, LONDON, THURSDAY EVENING, JULY 17, 1862. world on the question of the deaty and the subject of free trade in general, and there never had been an opportunity of doing justice to his eminent ser vices in that case. He had taken a more enlightened view of the interests of France than most of his countrymen had hitherto done. M. Rouher had spoken of the Emperor as having originated the treaty, and he (Mr. Cobden) could bear witness to the fact that the Emperor initiated the treaty, and he believed that the Emperor had the sincerest desire to unite not merely the governments, but the people of the two countries. (Cheers.) He (Mr. Cobden) had had better opportunities perhaps of observing than most Englishmen, and he was con vinced that the Emperor in all his acts had been actuated by a desire to unite these two great nations. That, indeed, had been the corner stone of his policy. (Cheers.) He (Mr. Cobden) would go further, and exp r ess his belief, founded also upon some oppo r t u nity of judging, that there was nothing that he could imagine that would induce that potentate to be a party to a rupture with this country short of an attempt by any Government or any minister of this country to inflict a humiliation on his country. (Cheers.) Their would live in history , a nd he had done i t under a guest of that eveningeighand than a n e Le g u r i e s at x w v o i rk, . I w f h t i h ch e more powerful sever aristocracy of France had eighty years ago allowed Turgot, as he desired, to do the same thing, there would probably have been no revolution, and the d ynas ty of that day would have remained to this. Unfortunately, the inauguration of free trade in France had been attended by deplorable convulsions, with regard to the manufacturing interests, arising from causes entirely unconnected with free trade; and the opponents of free trade would no doubt at tempt to fasten those effects upon the commercial treaty. The great reforms of Mr. Huskisson in 1825 were followed by a commercial crisis, and the Spital fields w eavers o f those days, i f they couldhave had their will, would probably have hung Mr. Huskis son as an example. His memory was now honoured throughout the land, and the manufacturers of France would yet do justice to the guest of that even ing. They were that evening celebrating the cause of free trade. The refrain of one of Beranger's songs advocating the alliance of nations was " Lon nez-vous les mains." Free trade said " Shake bands; give each other the hand and something in the hand." (Cheers.) That something meant the superfluity of the giver and the necessity of the receiver. (Cheers.) Such a meeting as the present had never been held before, and he had never sat down with so many Members of Parliament at such a meeting, and he had never yet sat down with Members of Parliament of a different party from his own. He saw in that reunion a proof of the universality of the senti ments to which they had been listening on that occasion. They were doing honour to a man whose merits were not sufficiently known ; but under their auspices their guest had had an opportunity of de livering a speech which would be circulated through Europe and the world. Sir G. C. LEWIS proposed " The Health of M. Chevalier and M. Dufour," and in doing so said there never was a time when the prospects of peace were so solid as now. He believed that the Emperor of the French entertained the most cordial and ear nest desire to maintain pacific relations with this country. (Cheers.) Several other toasts and speeches followed, and the company did not separate until a late hour. LAW INTELLIGENCE.-Aly 16. COURT OF CHANCERY. (Before the Lord Chancellor.) REDDIN V. METROPOLITAN BOARD OF WORKS. This was an appeal from a decision of Vice- Chancellor Wood. The plaintif f was a contractor for the removal of dust and rubbish, which he afterwards prepared for brickmaking, and also for agricultural purposes. His business was carried on at the Grove, South wark, in certain premises, including a dwelling house, engine -house, " tot shop," or sorting room, slop shoot, and an extensive yard, occupied by dust and manure heaps, which were subjected to various successive processes before being rendered available. The defendants had given the plaintiff notice of their requiring a small portion of the premises, viz., the " tot shop," for the purposes of the Covent garden Approach and Southwark and Westminster Communication Act, 1857, by which a new street from Blackfriars-road to High-street, Borough,was one of the works required to be made. The plaintiff refused to sell the portion required by defendants, on the ground that the whole of the premises in his occupation, and used by him for his business, consti tuted " a manufactory" within section 92 of the Lands Clauses Act, and claimed the right, under that section, of compelling the defendants to take the whole property if they required any part of it. It was contended by the plaintiff that the " tot shop," or sorting shop, was essential to the carrying on of the plaintiff's business, the most important process of sifting and sorting being carried on there. The question was whether this part of the premises came within the meaning of the word " manufac tory." The Vice Chancellor held that it did, and made an order for an injunction to restrain the de fendants from taking any steps for acquiring the premises except on the terms of taking the whole. Hence the appeal. Mr. Rolt, Mr.Willcock, and Mr. C. Hall appeared for the appellants ; Sir Hugh Cairns, Mr. Giffard, and Mr. E. Bury were for the plaintiff. The Lord Chancellor, without hearing the reply, said he did not concur in the opinion of the Vice Chancellor, that the business carried on by the plaintiff constituted him a manufacturer within the meaning of the Lands Clauses Consolidation Act. Such being the case, the " tot shop" was not part of a " manufactory," the taking of which by defendants would render them liable to take the whole of the plaintiff's premises. The plaintiff was a dustman, contractor, and scavenger, and the use of the " tot shop" was incident to that business, and did not in any way form portion of a " manufactory." The order of the Court below would therefore be reversed and the injunction dissolved. Appeal allowed. COURT OF PROBATE AND DIVORCE. (Before Sir C. Cresswell.) ZYCHLINSKI V. ZYCHLINSKI-EXTRAORDINARY CASE. This was a suit for judicial separation brought by the wife against her husband on the grounds of cruelty and adultery. Mr. Macaulay, Q.C., and Dr. Spinks were coun sel for the petitioner ; Sir F. Slade and Dr. Swabey appeared on behalf of the respondent. The learned counsel, in opening the case, said that this suit was surrounded with peculiar features, which are detailed in the following evidence : Adeline Kate Zychlinski stated that she was the daughter of a clergyman of the Church of England, residing with her mother, who was separated from her husband, as was intimated, because of the lady having some years since become a convert to Roman Catholicism. In the year 1860 the mother of the petitioner, with her two daughters, were re siding at Rome, where the respondent was also living in style, moving in the best society. He de scribed himself as a baron of the Russian empire and the relative of a Russian ambassador. The peti tioner made his acquaintance, and after a short courtship they were married. They proceeded to Hyeres, in the south of France, where they resided at first very happily ; but rumours got abroad that he was not a baron, that he was not even a Rus sian, but that he was a Prussian, a private in a Prus sian regiment, and a deserter, being, in point of fact, an impostor. Petitioner's mother was about to give a party, to which some Russian friends were invited. The respondent objected, he flew into a passion. He went to Marseilles upon the pretence of getting credentials to respectability, but he did not bring them. When the petitioner told him of the rumours that he was not a baron, but a deserter from the Prussian army, he threw a brush at her and threatened to shoot her ; and on one occasion, during a ride on horseback upon the ledge of a frightful precipice, he said he would hurl himself and her down it, because he said " he knew she be• lieved the rumours circulated about him." She was reduced to a very low and nervous state in conse quence of his repeated threats. The petitioner bad £3OO for her trousseau ; but the respondent charged her father with being dishonourable. They were married according to the rites of the Roman Catholic church, to which the mother, as already stated, and her two daughters had become converts. Some days after the ride on horseback, when he threatened to hurl her down the precipice, he was asked ver ngr Y. He drew up a kind of separation and wltuess to sign it. He laid it on the table, end t oo k h Ile the e threw it e t r by the wrists and made her sign it. it iighed at her, tore the paper, and mother, and her face. He laid hold of her wards dra gged e t TY strangled her. He after room. , lie ad: l e nges in Fre n ch the respondent tore th em man or Polish. Count D, the challenges was sent, wrote challenges, but , r o d wrote others in Ger , tor and commissioned a servant to inform ritione e r tt in: ctou th wm e thehno d etm r r a iesn w onpt i e n wo g noo - ..f, sh wife write several chal dent that be would not accept any challenge from " him." Respondent beat the servant's head against the ground. He was moaning and walking about the room all night. Petitioner could get no sleep from that time till she left. He dragged her bed into the middle of the room, and threatened to shoot her. There were no servants as they went home at night. Petitioner left her husband on the 22d February. Captain Arthur Lowe, a cousin of her mother's, had been sent by her father to take her away. Petitioner was very ill at the time. She wee in a weak and nervous state. A child was born on the sth August, Cross examined by Sir F. Slade—Petitioner did not believe the rumours. Capt. Lowe came because her father was ill. Sir F. Slade—This was a love match; was it not? Witness—l believe I married as most other people do. Sir F. Slade—Did you not live upon him ? Witness—No ;my mamma received some money from Cardinal Antonelli. My mamma never re ceived any money from respondent. The respondent was moving in good society, possessing means, hav ing money, and in every way as a baron and noble man. Sir C. Cresswell—Supposed to be so. Witness—Mamma received a thousand scudi (£220) from Cardinal Antonelli. M. Zychlinski was very kind to mamma, who was in Rome with out money. Zychlinski pretended to lend the money, but it was really given by Cardinal Anto nelli. Mamma was a convert to Roman Catholicism. Zychlinski was employed. in procuring the money, because papa would not repay Cardinal Antonelli. It was made to appear that Zychlinski lent the money. It was agreed that Zychlinski should go to England, to papa, and represent that he had paid £4OO for her. Did not recollect that the respondent ever said he did not marry the mother and sister, and that he would not keep them. The respon dent represented himself, when I became ac quainted with him, as a Russian baron. He said he was acquainted with several distinguished people, and that the Princess d Galitzin, wife of the Rus sian ambassador at Mairid, was his cousin. After the separation the petitioner applied to Baron Mar tin for a writ of habeas corpus, which was granted, and he was very anxious to get his wife back again. Mary F. 'Maltby, sister of the petitioner, corro borated the above statement. She further stated that several Russian friends had stated that the re spondent was not a Russian baron, and the papers which he was sent to Marseilles to procure were vouchers from his amtassador as to his respectabi lity, but he returned without them. Lord Henry Kerr told Mrs. Maltby that the respondent was not what he represented timself. M. Pallatin, a Rus sian gentleman, also reported that he was not a baron of the Russian Empire, but a deserter from the Prussian army. She also remembered his having written 11 challenges. Sir F, Slade—Ther, he had plenty of people to shoot. Sir 0. Cresswell—No, Sir Frederick ; they would not be shot. (Laughter.) Sir F. Slade—Was it when he ceased to be a baron that you ceased to call him mon cher Louis Witness—Not for that particularly. Had he re mained amiable— Sir C. Cresswell—Having discovered the wolf, as long as the wolf remained quiet — Sir F. Slade—Or retained his sheep's clothing. Capt. Arthur Lowe said he received a letter and subsequently a telegram, requesting him to take Mrs. Zychlinski away from her husband's cruelty. Cross-examined by Sir F. Slade—lt was one of the charges against the respondent that he was an impostor. Witness did not go to the respondent, because it would have been useless. The French authorities were not applied to, because the con sul represented that several things had happened to English residents which were treated in such a manner that the consul recommended the wife to be removed. Lord Kerr also advised the proceeding. The respondent followed his wife to witness's house, at Nottingham, where his wife was. Witness gave the respondent in charge of the police for threats. Mrs. James said she kept lodgings in Talbot street, Nottingham. Respondent brought a lady there other than his wife. She noticed on several occasions the impression of two persons in the bed. The respondent had had a bad throat, which wit ness poulticed with linseed, a portion of which was afterwards found in the lady's bed. This person's linen was marked "Adeline Baroness Zychlinski." She also left behind a pair of boots, which had in side the name of " Maltby." The petitioner was not the person who resided with Zychlinski. Heard the respondent say that he was charged with ob taining money under false pretences, or something to that effect. Mary Anne James, daughter of the last witness, proved having heard the respondent go into the bed-room of the woman who came to him at her mother's house and remain there. This concluded the case for the petitioner. Mr. Macaulay addressed the jury'. He contended that the case was clear, and lest it should be said that he was afraid to put Mrs. Maltby in the box, he would simply state that he did not desire she should be tortured in cross-examination. She had acted perhaps unwisely, and had been grossly de ceived, but that vas all that could be said. Sir Frederick Slade said she was the only person who could tell the jury the relations which subsisted between these people, and the circumstances under which the money was obtained from Cardinal An tonelli, or whether the respondent had obtained it for the lady. He sympathised with the young lady, but the jury had to discharge a public duty and do justice between the parties. He could not deny the adultery, but he would deny that any cruelty had been committed. _ His Lordship said that a great deal was made of the mother of the petitioner not being called. But why was not the respondent called to give evidence ? He was equally able to speak to th ese matters, and he had an obvious interest in the issue. Lord Stowell had said it was not easy to define what was cruelty. It was to be constructed out of all the circumstances surrounding each particular case. The Jury having deliberated, found that the re spondent had bean guilty of cruelty and adultery. Sir C. Cresswell granted the decree, and the costs of the suit as against the respondent followed as a matter of course in cases of judicial separation. —• if they had any doubt the high character the defen dant had received ought certainly to have consi derable weight. The jury, atter deliberating a short time•., re turned a verdict of not guilty. W. Brown, 25, pleaded guilty to three charges of arson. It appeared that the prisoner on the same day, and within a very short period, had committed all the offences to which he had pleaded guilty. In the first place, he set fire to a barn in which there was a quantity of wheat ; he then set fire to a stack of straw, and afterwards to a stack of hay, the whole of which were destroyed. Mr. Baron Bramwell, in passing sentence, said he was of opinion that no crime was more hateful or detestable than the crime of arson. In ordinary offences the person who committed them had some advantage, because he obtained possession of the money or property of another ; but when property was destroyed wilfully by fire it was of no benefit to the person committing the act, but was an injury to man kind at large. It appeared by a report that had been made to him, that the prisoner had several times enlisted as a soldier and that he deserted, and then re-enlisted and obtained the bounty, and he appeared to be an incorrigibly bad fellow. On the present occasion he appeared to have committed the crime of arson three times in one day, and it also appeared that he stated when he was apprehended that he should have done more mischief of the same description if his hicifer matches had not gone out. It was necessary under these circumstances to pass a sentence that would prevent him from doing any more mischief for a long time to come, and he should therefore order him to he kept in penal servitude for 20 years. Simon Child, s. little urchin, stated in the calendar to be 11 years old, was charged with feloniously placing some stones upon the London and North- Western Railway, with intent to obstruct the en gines and carriages passing along the line, and to endanger the safety of the passengers. Mr. Clark prosecuted, and the prisoner was de • fended by Mr. Codd. It appeared that on the evening of May 27th the down train to St. Albans, upon arriving near Wat ford, ran over two stones that were placed upon the rails, and the driver giving information of the cir cumstance upon arriving at the Watford station, the signalman at the spot was directed to keep a strict watch. He did so, and on the following day the prisoner and two other boys were seen to go up the line, and the prisoner was observed to stoop and place something upon the rails, and it turned oat that two stones were placed there. It also appeared that at the time the engine ran over the stones on the previous evening a search was made, and it was discovered that stones of a similar kind had been placed upon both the up lines of rails. When the prisoner was apprehended it appeared that he denied having placed the stones upon the rails, and said that one of the other boys had done it, Mr. Codd made an earnest appeal to the jury on behalf of the prisoner, and, while admitting the act imputed to him was one very likely to be at tended with the most serious consequences, and which m erited severe punish ment when it was clearly established, he submitted that in the first place it had not been proved beyond doubt that the prisoner placed the stones upon the railway; and, secondly, that, supposing the jury should consider that this fact was proved, there was nothing to show that he did so with any of the intents charged in the indict ment. He then called the attention of the jury to the law regarding offences committed by persons of tender age, and said that in the case of any one under 14 years of age they were not responsible for an offence of this description, or any other, unless it was shown they were aware of the probable conse quences of their acts, and were at thaasame time ac tuated by a malicious intention to do mischief. Mr. Baron Bramwell, in summing up, said he did not think there could be any doubt that the prisoner did place the stones upon the railway, but the next important question was, to consider with what intent the prisoner had so placed them. In the case of a grown-up person the law considered him re sponsible for the probable consequences of his acts, but this was not so in the case of a child under 14 years of age. In the present case therefore, if they should be of opinion that the prisoner was merely actuated by a feeling of mischief, or to see the effect of a train going over the stones, that would not be sufficient ; it was absolutely necessary that they should be satisfied that he was actuated by one of the intents imputed by the indictment before they could convict him. The jury, after some deliberation, returned a verdict of not guilty. Mr. Baron Bramwell told the prisoner that, although he had escaped upon the present charge, he was still liable to be proceeded against under another section of the act of Parliament. He might have caused serious mischief and loss of life or broken limb by his act, and he hoped that he would be punished. The criminal business was brought to a close in the afternoon, and both courts will be engaged to day in trying causes. ASSIZE INTELLIGENCE. HOME CIRCUIT.—HERTFORD, July 16. (Before Mr. Baron Bramwell.) George Farr Arnold surrendered to take his trial, for wilful and corrupt perjury. Mr. G. Denman, Q.C., was specially retained, with Mr. Willoughby, to conduct the prosecution; Mr.. Serjeant Parry, also specially retained, and and Mr. Woollett, appeared for the defendant. This case stood over from the spring assizes, and it created some interest, not only from the nature of the charge, which was rather a peculiar one, but from the position of the defendant, who carries on an extensive business as a builder at St. Albans, and who is one of the town councillors. The alleged perjury was contained in what is called in legal parlance an affidavit of increase—an instrument which it is necessary to execute in order that the the successful party in an action at law may re cover his costs from his opponent. It appeared that last year a person named Proctor, who was the prosecutor of the present indictment, brought an action against the defendant in the present Court of Qucen's Bench, and upon the trial the latter obtained a verdict, and in due course the defendant sought to obtain his costs, and he made the affidavit in question before Mr. Annesley, the commissioner appointed for that purpose at St. Albans. Tho total amount of the bill of costs was £ 3 B 16s. ; and among the items the defend ant alle e a that ho had paid 15s. to three witnesses named Perkins, Beau, and Wright, and 225. to two other nitnesses, and also a sum of £3 16s. for rail way fares, cab hire, and refreshment for the same witnesses • whereas it turned out that at the tim e the affidavit was made he had only given them a f ew shill i ngs . It appea re d, h owever, that the affidavit w a s a joint one by the defendant himself and hi s so li c i tor; and Mr. Annesley stated that at the time he swore to it the defendant did not read the contents, and that he said he saw it was signed by his solicitor, and he supposed it was all right, It also appeared that the sums mentioned in the affidavit were subsequently paid to the seve ral witnesses. Mr. Sergeant Parry made a very able address to the jury on behalf of the defendant, and he urged that, although be might have acted carelessly in swearing to the affidavit without reading it, still this was all that could be fairly alleged against him. He submitted that it was extremely improbable that a person in the respectable position of the defendant should have been guilty of so serious a crime in order to obtain a paltry sum of a few pounds, and that there could be very little doubt that seeing the instrument war signed by his attorney, he thought it was a matter of course that he should also have to sign it, and did so without intending to do any wrong. A great many respectable witnesses were called to speak to the defendant's character, and they all described him to be a man of the highest honour and integrity. Mr. Baron Bramwell, in summing up, very important that affidavits of this kind should b e correct, and h e cou ld no t su b s cribe to perjury the doc trine that a man did not commit sa id it was ry because he professed to he unacquainted with the contents of the instrument to the truth of which he w as sworn. The jury would, however, take all the eir camstances of the case into their consideration, and POLICE INTELLIGENCE.-July 16. MANSION-HOUSE.—A young man who gave a name known to be feigned, and refused his ad dress, was brought before the Lord Mayor, charged with robbery. Complainant, a widow lady named Locke, was walking on Ludgate-hill on Tuesday afternoon, about three o'clock, when it was much thronged. She passed the prisoner, who stood on the edge of the kerb with a bouquet of flowers in one hand. Without knowing it, he was then being watched by Edward Hancock, a city detective officer, from the opposite side of the street. The prisoner turned round and walked on the right side of the com plainant after she bad passed him. He then put his left hand into her dress-pocket, and withdraw ing it clinched thrust it into a pocket of his trou sers. On seeing this Hancock, who had crossed the street and was following the prisoner, threw his arms round him and carried him piniobed into a shop. There the prisoner made a desperate but useless effort to escape, and in the struggle he dropped a purse, which, with the money it con tained, the complainant afterwards identified as be longing to her. A few days before the same con stable, who had seen a lady dogged for some distance by two known thieves, and felt sure that they had robbed her, asked her before attempting to take them into custody if she had lost anything. She replied curtly that she had not, apparently re garding the question as a liberty. He was obliged reluctantly to forego apprehending the two men. Presently the 'lady, in a state of great excitement, returned and told him her purse had been stolen ; but the men whom he had suspected had then dis appeared. The prisoner made no defence. Hans, a detective officer, said he had seen the prisoner in custody for a high way robbery in Mary lebone-lane about two years ago. The prisoner challenged him to prove that, say ing people like bim would think nothing of swear ing a man's life away. He added that he had been seen that morning by several constables, not one of whom knew him, though they had evidently come with a view to his recognition. Finding he was about to be sent before a jury, he pleaded " Guilty," saying it was his first offence, and asked to be dealt with summarily. The Lord Mayor committed him to Newgate for trial. WORSHIP-STR,E ET.—George Fortescue, aged 42, residing at No. 21, Pendegrast-villas, Stoke Newington, was charged with cutting and wound ing, with intent to do grievous bodily harm. Herbert Led:mu, a quiet-spoken boy, about 12 years of age, said—Last evening I was passing along Bridport-piece, New North-road, alone, when this gentleman, whom I never saw before, came behind me. I felt a sharp cut on the back of my neck, and then I saw him put a knife into his coat pocket. I bled a good deal. Evidence was given that the defendant shortly after the injury had been inflicted had been found in a public-house intoxicated. The sharp-pointed penknife produced was seen to drop from his coat pocket. A certificate from a divisional surgeon of police s t a ted that the wound was superfi c i a l and about three inches in length. It had been caused by some sharp instrument, such as a penknife. The defendant declared that the injury was o_c casioned by him with a k e y, an d not a knife. He recollected nothing of the assault. A friend of the defendant said that when the latter was inebriated he was incapable of control ling his actions. Mr. Cooke declared that he had not the slightest doubt of the injury having been inflicted with a knife. The defendant was ordered to pay a fine of £5, half of which would be given to the lad. CL ERKENWELL.—John Burns, aged 35, who described himself as an author end a public lec turer, having no home, was charged with attempt ing to commit suicide. Police constable Lillierap, 409 A, said that about eleven o'clock on Tuesday night he was on duty in Co pehagen_street, Islington i , where h e saw t h e pri soner lying on a doorstep n the act of taking a bottle from his m outh. lie spoke to hini t , and endeavoured to lift him u p. receiving no a nswer! At this time his legs were rigid, his eyes were protruding, and he seemed on th e po i n t o f d eat h. With assistance the witness got bim up, and then found under hi m porti ons of two bottles which had contained laudanum, one of them being labelled " poison," and the other " laudanum. The prisoner was taken to the hospital and the stomach-pump was used. It was found necessary to employ the galvanic battery io keep him from going to sleep. At the workhouse the prisoner said he had been very well off; he was sorry he had not been allowed to die, as he did not wish his friends to know, through the papers, how he was placed. He refused to give his address. The defendant, in answer to the charge, said that some friends had paid for him while he had been at Malvern under the cold -water treatment. He had no right to name them, as he had lost all claim on their kindness. Drink was the cause of the attempt he had made to destroy his life. The magistrate might lock him up as long as he liked. He should never mention the names of those who were his friends. Ho had better lock up the public-houses, and not the people. Mr. Barker said the prisoner was very foolish in not stating who his friends were. He was remanded. _ John Willford, a cowkeeper of Highgate, w as charged with attempting to commit suicide by cutting his throat. Mr. Barker remanded him for a week. SOUTHWARK.—EIIen Sweeny, an old woman, was brought up charged with obtaining 2s. and a cap front under false and fraudulent pretences. The prosecutrix, Mrs. Sparrow, a married woman, said she kept a bonnet shop at 131, Bermondsey street. On Saturday afternoon last the prisoner came in and asked her to purchase a stay lace. Believing her to be a very poor woman she bought one, but the prisoner instead of leaving lingered about the door, and at last asked to look at her (witness's) hand. When the prisoner had looked at it she asked for sixpence, saying that she had good fortune in store, and she would tell her all about it. On getting the sixpence the prisoner told her her husband would die by accident, and that she would then marry another man, have several children, and be very rich. Mr. Combe asked her if she had any children by her husband ? Witness replied that she had two. After she gave the prisoner the sixpence she wanted another, as she could then tell what sort of a man her future husband would be. The witness thought she should like to hear what more the prisoner had to say and gave her another sixpence, when the prisoner told her he would be a dark man and a prosperous man. After that the prisoner pulled out a pack of cards and shuffled them, and the witness picked one out, when she was told that she would have four chil dren by her next husband. Mr. Combe here expressed his surprise that any woman of her age, and more especially a trades.. man's wife, could be so foolish as to be imposed upon by an ignorant hag like the prisoner. She ought to have turned her out of the shop there and then, or given her into the custody of a policeman. Witness replied that the prisoner would not leave the shop, but told her that she wanted an other shilling to consult the planets for her, as she had no doubt she had a lucky star. The witness gave her a shilling as requested, and then the pri soner pointed to a cap-front and said she must have that to wind up her nativity. She gave her the front, and then the prisoner left the shop. Mr. Combe asked her if she had any desire then to lose her husband ? The witness replied that she had not. She was so frightened that she was glad to get rid of the prisoner, thinking that she should never see her again. However, on Tuesday afternoon she was surprised to see the prisoner walk into the shop, and in the coolest manner demand 4s. more to com plete her horoscope. Witness told her she had no more money, and requested her to leave the shop, when the prisoner turned round and said she knew she had money, and money she would have before she left. Witness then sent for a constable and gave her into custody. The prisoner here said that the lady told her to come on Tuesday. She never told fortunes. How could a poor ignorant old woman like her do such a thing ? Sergeant Pearce, 7 M, said he took the prisoner into custody, and found upon her an old greasy pack of cards. The prisoner accounted for this by saying she picked them up in the street and put them in her pocket. Mr. Combe, after again expressing his surprise at the foolish conduct of the prosecutrix, sentenced the prisoner to two months' imprisonment and hard labour. LAMBETH.—Yesterday Mr. Denton, from the office of the Messrs. Freshfield, solicitors to the Bank of England, accompanied by Mr. John Coe, superintendent of the Bank-note Printing De partment, waited on the Hon. G. Norton to re quest advice and assistance. Mr. Denton said that the governors of the Bank of England had deter mined to use every effort to prevent the circulation of " flash" notes, and to prosecute and punish to the utmost rigour of the law all persons assisting in their circulation. Now that so many foreigners are in England it is necessary that something should be done to protect them from sharpers making use of spurious notes. He might mention one instance of the frauds committed which had been brought under the notice of the governors of the Bank of England. On the Bth of the present month an Italian gentleman came to London to visit the International Exhibition. He went to the Crystal Palace, and, while looking at some Italian casts or sculpture, was addressed by a per son of respectable exterior in English. A foreigner, who said he was a Swiss, joined them, and made himself understood by both. They talked of Spain America, and other countries, and while comparing them with England the Swiss said he had been robbed of £5OO. He remarked how necessary it was in London that foreigners should take parti cular care of their money, so as to protect it from English pickpockets. The Italian gentleman spoke of the money he possessed, and produced 20 napo leons. His companions then drew from their pockets bundles of what he believed to be bank notes. The Swiss took the 20 napoleons into his hands, and at the same time handed to their owner several. notes. He then went away, saying he should bring back a bottle of wine. The gentleman was told that he need not be alarmed, as the notes left in his hands as security were of much greater value than the gold intrusted to the man, but in order to remove his suspense he (the second sharper, for such were both) would go and bring the gentleman with the wine. He entered the building, and it was scarcely necessary to say he did not return. The Italian, thus plundered, still under the impression that he held security equiva lent to his loss, presented the notes at the Bank, and, to his utter astonishment, was told they were quite worthless. The Governors of the Bank of England, in the event of the apprehension of these men, would feel it to be their duty to prosecute them for the felony. In the course of inquiries that had been instituted it had been ascertained that a person named J. W. Peel, a printer in the Lower Marsh, had been in the habit of printing and circulating these notes. This person had been dead for three years. He was succeeded in his business by a Mr. Knowles, who was understood to be a re spectable man. If he was in possession of the plates from which these' "flash" notes were pro duced, he was a party to their circulation. Mr. Denton said that Mr. Knowles, if made acquainted with the law, might give up the plates and flash notes; and, as he resided in the district of this court, he considered it the proper place to make an application on the subject. Mr. Norton observed that he was very glad in deed to find the Governors of the Bank of England coming forward to suppress the evil of " flash note" circulation. As Mr. Knowles was a person of respectability, there could be no necessity for issuing a summons against him, and he (the magi strate) should send an officer with the applicant to hear what he had to say. On his return, the officer informed the magistrate that Mr. Knowles was out, but that his clerk had undertaken, as soon as he returned, to forward all the notes and plates to the Bank of England, and not circulate a single note again. In reply to Mr. Norton, Mr. Coe said he was quite satisfied with this, and so the matter ended. THE RUSSIAN PRIESTHOOD.—The clergy are the lowest in the world out of Thibet. rho bishops are the most slavish of courtiers before the nobles, and the most vulgar of tyrants among their clergy. The clergy are a suffering class,—not only ignorant and oppressed, but pain fully abased. In a Protestant country, where the clergy of all sects deal with ideas as the basis of sentiments,itis scarcely possible to conceive of th e wa y in which the minis ters of a purely ritual religion a re regarded, as in the Greek in Church or in Buddhist society. Perhaps clergy the Russia aro less affected by recent events than class. Nobody thinks of raising them : they make can hardly sink lower in fortunes and repute. It must,however, a ny other some difference to them whether the landowners are keep ing open house, or shutting up and goi ng away; or whether or mutinous and the peasants are in their or dinary m oo d, inune is prosperous and menacing ; or whether the merry, or full of gloom and strife. The clergy, theref ore , are not much happier than o th e r people just now.—O nce a Week. ~ —Sick Headaches.—Thousands suffer ADVERTIsEmz — T n . o yanee when the body and brain aro from worrying r a m n dam p weather. Holloway's purifying depressed by warm ready means of cure for indigestion, bilious- Pills t a presen s, an d fl a tulency. I n debilitated constitutions floss, fai n an d nerv° t rh a bits, these Pills are the best restorat i ves, all the unpleasant conseen nces of toridity of they corree remove d' t • - e fail to b ' the liver' th9y of ts ension, and never o vi a t e obstructions the bowels and to induce their regular all n For all abdo minal ailments Holloway's Pills aa tio • are the safest possible Medicine : they a t once give ease aid comfor and naturally strengthen the whole series of orga ns concerned in the process of digestion, and will bo found useful in every household. LONDON : Printed and Published by JOHN CHAR- I ' ll'l n ' of No. 112, St ran d , P r i nter, at THE SUN Office Fio. 11 -'1 Strand, in the Precinctlof the Savoy, in the. County °4 Mid dlesex.--Thursday, July 17, 1862. • PV G. 1 LLS'.3I. --0------ PATSEY REARDON AND ROBT. TRAVERS (THE BLACIO , ron £2oo.—These members of the P.R. met on Tuesday, when, in the seventh round, hostilities were suspended, owing to the arrival of the police ; the battle, which had been fought in favour of Travers, having lasted exactly 37 minutes. The combatants were ordered by the referee to meet yesterday for the renewal of hostilities, and when the selected spot had been reached, "all right" was given by a "friendly p ower ," th ere f ore th e commissary and is satellites lost no time in making the ring arrang elnen , ° complete. Neither of the combatants had any strong mar of their recent meeting, for although Reardon had had the worst of it, still he had been able to " rub " it off in a ear prising manner—a proof of the excellence of his condition. Bob, who "looked as fresh as (black) paint," had for his seconds the gallant Job Cobley and a respected ex-member of the P.R., while Hicks (who is matched to fig ht Ge ' t lagher) and George Crockett did the requisite for Reardon. All being ready the men were conducted to the scratch, and at 31 minutes past 2 o'clock were left to resume the contest. The few rounds fought on the first day bad been sufficient to show the determined qualities of the me n. 112 the first round there had been on the preceding day w are of caution exhibited, as neither man would throw awaY chance. The lead, as on the preceding dav,was taken b Travers—the Darkey again and again putting it 6 6 there with the left with stinging severity, while at times, as °C. ' casiobnody. T served,hhe first of theefollowedu three eventspthesamef was mthe right on the ga i ne d by Reardon, and a long first round was brought to a fine fini s h, in 50 minutes. Th e D ar k ey st ill h a d t h e l ea d, a nd so d ie ' ho " perform " on his antagonist that his friends beca me more than ever confident, and Bob remained as strong a favourite as he had been at the first meeting. There we re five well fought but long rounds in two hours and twen t y minutes, during which Travers had still the lead ; but new the rain and hail coming down in a deluge, had a depress ing effect upon Travers. He became extremely cold, an d the features of the contest completely changed, for Reardon began to take the lead. Bob, however, struggled agiii nst his difficulties with the most unyielding pluck ; he o w " not (although there were momentary fluctuations) chang e the tide of battle again into his favour, and Reardon wa s finally hailed the winner of this well fought battle, there being 53 rounds in four hums and five minutes. TraYe ra was much mortified at his defeat, but his friends felt no man could have done more than he to secure a differen result. THE CONFEDERATE CROMWELL. " Stonewall" Jackson is everywhere described as a " al° man" intellectually, even dull. Some say he was a tedion: professor, and all agree that he has a creeping look. And yet, if you ask them now what they mean by that, they sal they do not know; all they do know is that he is obstinate as a mule, and plucky as a bulldog, which means Jus t nothing of a man whose prime quality is celerity, qui c ..." conclusions, and startling execution; who, as a soldier, W as rapid as he is wary, abounding in surprises, brave almost to rashness, and inventive almost to romance. for his outer man, he looks at least seven years older tha he is ; his height about five feet ten inches ; his figure thicl‘ set, square shouldered, and decidedly clumsy ; his ga it very awkward, stooping, and with long strides. He o ften walks with his head somewhat on one side, and his eye d fixed upon the ground, imparting to his whole appearanc e that abstracted quality which young ladies describe as absent-minded. A lady who has known hit, long and we ll has told me that she never saw him on horseback withou t laughing, short stirrups, knees cramped up, heels stuck out behind, and chin on his breast—a most unmilitary pheno' menon. In society he is quiet, but cheerful—not loque" cious, but intelligent and shrewd; in religion the bluest kind of a Presbyterian, and extremely strict in his church observances. In Winchester he took a very active part in revivals, and habitually led the " Union" prayer meet ings, To illustrate the popularity of the man :—For solve reason, which has never been made public, the expediency of removing him from his command was at one thne freely discussed in the Confederate Cabinet, and all but two members favoured the motion, those two arguia that a man of such exemplary modesty and yet of such intense religious enthusiasm and indomitable firmness* must possess those moral elements which, combined with his military education and experience, s hould constitute a great general. Their opposition served to pot" pone a decision, and the motion was held under considers" tion. Meantime the people of the valley got wind of the affair, and with a great outcry of indignation and threats se assailed the Powers at Richmond that the question We e dropped "like a hot potato." It was about this time that Jackson sent to Richmond his rebel-famous despatch-- " S end me more men and no orders, or more orders and no men." Such is the Rebel Napoleon, for whom his people venture to claim that in four weeks he has marched 3 5 ° miles and won four victories—that he has crippled or dis persed the forces of Milroy and Schenck at M‘Dowelly Banks at Front Royal and Winchester, Fremont at Cross Keys, and Shields at Fort Republic—that he holds M'Dowell in check to take care of Washington and Marl° land, and monopolises for the amusement of the world the attention of six distinguished generals.—New York Tri bune. COUNTRY MAIIRE26. . !, NEWARK-WEDNESDAY. In this neighbourhood the wheat plant is generally look' ing healthy. Barley varies. .Beans and oats are fair crops. White wheat new, 56s to 60s Barley, grinding.. 28s to 308 Red do. sls to 56s Oats, old, .. 24s to 300 Old white 568 to 60s New do —s to —s Red do. 51s to 56s Beans.. 41s to 46s Barley, malting.... 36s to 40s Beans, new to — 0 Peas, ....40s to 42s HULL--TUESDAY. A moderate supply of English wheat at market to-dap. with a fair demand. --- Wheat.... Old white per qr. sBs Od to 60s Od Old red 79 New white New red ... . . . 7, „ 0 0 0 : 59 sg s 000 ' l l Dantzic Konb , &c. old white 55s Od to 60s Od Dutch, Belgian, and French. 58s Od to 62s Od Baltic and Hamburg, red ..., 508 Od to 55s Od St. Petersburg and Riga, old. 508 Od to 52s Od Barley.... English malting 34s Od to 37s Od Grinding 3ls Od to 33s Oa Saal and Oderbruck Holstein and Danish 34s Od to 36s Oa Grinding 3os Od to 31s 01 Oats English, new 23s Od to 25s 0 4 Archangel and Rig-a, per st osl2 1d to 13a Friesland and Dutch o Bl3d to 08130 Swedish and Danish osl2id to 0813 a, Beans ....English, old, per qr New pigeon . 42s Od to 44s Od New tick. 4os Od to 42s Od Egyptian .. 38s Od to 40s ocl Peas Foreign breakers Grinding Tares .... Spring Indian Corn Linseed, feeding crushing •• 4os Od to 52s 0a Linseed cakes (Hull) • 19 00to £9 5 0 t) Foreign Bl5 oto 9 0 Rape cakes 6 0 oto 6 5 0 Bones 5 5 oto 510 MELTON MOWBRAY —TUESDAY. There was a short supply of wheat to-day, and we had a moderate trade, at about late currencies. Barley ruled dull, and late prices were supported. White wheat, 6 0 ° Od to 63s Od; red, 54s Od to 58s per 36 stone; beaus sold at 08s to 46s for old ; new sorts, --5 per 38 st. barley, 36s to 39s for malting, and 29s to 33s per qr. for grinding ; oats, 22s to 34s Od per 24 stone. Colonel Colt, inventor of the revolver, died worth about £BOO,OOO. His manufactory at Hartford/ United States, employs 1,100 hands, and the wages Pal a there amount to £lO,OOO per month. A few years since the very lowness of the figure would have been enough to condemn the sample. People novh however, may be induced to try a Wine, the quality of will& is quite extraordinary for the money, and that no man need be ashamed to put on his table.—Mark Lane Express. [TWO Xeres Comida Sherry is imported by the Vintage Wine Com pany, 14, Bloomsbury-street, 18s. and 20s. per dozen.]—AdV BIRTHS. BATH.—On the 16th inst., at 1, Stable -yard, St. James's► the Marchioness of Bath, of a son. 14th inst., at Grafton, Underwood' the lion. Mrs. Courtenay Vernon, of TROUBRIDGE.—On the 15th inst., at Hampstead, Lady Troubridge, of a son. V : N it s° N or nt o h : VERNON.—On WITHALL.—On the 16th inst., at H am - common, Mr s . C. E. Withal', of a son. Mmon, in — p O t Northamptonshire, alt e r e , MARRIAGES. Tryr—Scom—On the 15th inst„ at Holy Trinity, South HKensington, Major-General Hutt, C.B. (Artillery) l : brother of the Right Hon. William Hutt, M.P., to Mi S i Scott, daughter of Lieut-General J. Scott, C. 8., Colon J Dragoon Guards. JAMES—GARDNER.—On the 15th inst., at St. George's, Hanover-square, John W. James, Esq., Lieut. 11 ..N.t, e , Eleanor, only surviving daughter of the late Major ta Hon. Herbert Gardner. errace, lteg BuDtliinetricgbityoT,nra:_gLeoiceinu4t9.th...ceoll.s DEATHS. BRADDYLLe--011 the 10th inst ., at Woodcoto House, Lil tßhradinsdtY,ll'a t ag h e e d r B r 6 esidence, 2, Yor k ; Esq, ent's park, Ann, relict of Miles Burkit t Cox. —On the 14th inst., at Colehill House, Fulham, G I . Henry Richardson Cox, Esq of 17, Ashbourne.roa I .) LANo.--On the 16th inst., at East Moulsey, wi dow of Ch ar l es Percher Lang, E sq ., an d d a ughter 1 the late Si r J o h n Owen, Bart., M.P. l'/DIARD—On the 4th in s t., R ear-Admiral G. Axr C. ir• 14 Ydiard, of Shalf or d, S urrey . R 0 GERS ,—On th e 14th i nst., Robert Rogers, E 561.9 of Abercrombie Villa Hampstead, and 30, King - street , Covent-garden, aged 62. Elizabeth,