The Sun. — London, England, 1807-12-08 00:00:00

LAW REPoirr: c(xtlitT e)t: vs! s ur.tsrcit, DEC. 7. BErOtE LO K.9 (Vr . il) SrXCIAL' lURYi A r w si t rll .l O 1 tit • 'IHI KING AGsCIN.2'r "ESQ. , . Thiv'was a caie which excited a more than ordi nary d grel , of interest, and hijed tie:" Court, with auditors at, a very,early, hour. It %vas an indiEttneut for perjury, ;preferred, by Mrs. Charlotte Mutts, of Ketteringitain, in Norfolk (formerly the Miss Wal pole - , who was the original Nancy ill the Camp), agninst,Thornas Graham, of Lincoln's-Inn, Esq. a (;entleman of. the fir4,t eminence in .the profession. Mr.Cuawnon ofwned the incliOnient, by stating that the l'foseent ft:, upon the death or her late hus band, Edward Esq. 11l :NA a Bill in the Court of Chance'ry, against Mr. (;rahatuand John Atkyns \Vright, Esq. as Trustees tbr her deceased husband's caking upon them, and uppn Mr. Graham is particuhr, to account to : . her for all,,Monies receiv ed.with,ref.erence; to the trust, The iudietment al 'edged that Mr'. Graham; in his answer to this to the truth of which he swore, omitted to bring forward the verities/sums of p‘2201. 20001.. 18901. and 10001. which-he was stated to have received upon the trust account, .and it was upon this omission' the different assign Aleuts of perjury was founded. 111. GAR now addressed the Jury oft behalf of the prbsecution. Hs; felt it unnecessary to do more than, render the fa&s.of the case ititeltigible,to the Jury,' In order that they night apply the . eyidence he should_ submit to them. He stated that this lady, upon her husband's death, bad confided her. atf-tirs to the ma nagement of Mr. Francis Plowden, a Barrister of the Coprt of Chancery, by whose advice she had insti tuted a suit against. the Defendant, her husband's trustee, to obtain im account of the manner in which bebaleltecuted the trust reposed in him that,after .Mr. Graham had put in his answer, the banking boot of the,, deceased was discovered, by which it appeared . that large sums - of money bad been paid to Mr. Oraliarn, respecting the trust, which he had not brought to account, or mentioned, in his answer. Upon this Mr.. Plowden had advised his client to prefer, the - present indiaiment,. He should now sliew'by the banking book, that the Defendant had ieceiyed the slims Mentioned in the hick:l . lll6M; iftid it would be proyed,hy the Pefendant's answer, that arts had not, stated any of the sutras in question. If he ,made out t,h'ts case, the Jury would have no hesi tation'as to the, verdiat it would,betheitduty to . pro twunce. The preliminary proof on the part of the prose cution :01.1,isted,of the answer of the Defendant, the h inking nook referredto by the Learned Coun aud s,:yeral other documents but upon cross- examining the. Witnesses who produced them, jt appeared, aitnast in the outset of the cause, clear,. that the Defendant, had not, received any of . 1 he sums contained in the ihdiettent, on the trust account, but that he had received them on distinct acAnuits, duly paid them over to Mr.Alkyl:S., and had,kegkilarly received ,his taitce fur them. The Lt arneLt Jnkinuitnated his opinion, while Alte , Prosectnrix's Witnesses. were uuder examination, that there was nott he slightest pretence fur the pro secution , but the Atm.): ney-Qcnetal requested it might proceed, in order that he inii.,ht . have an 'op4, prttinity doingtu.stice to o,K:injured character of Met Graham,' than whom there was.,not a mote honourable:matt hi the profession. Lie'added, that a l t h oug h, t h e r e v.vre innumerable objeCtions oft tl.e face of 'Vie , italiament, 'he should not,take advan tage of one of them. Mr. Plowden,,the Barrister, was examined on the part of the Prosecutris ; and upon, : his,',cif'§ . 6.„ 4 „mi... nation he admitted ,that drawn the draft of tale indidukent, and.J b util '., gone before eth GraniWnry as a.wituedts,: to : get t ,found, , and that • the iithorpey eonee tined land ticen..his clerk, If e h a d advised The inoasure, bet - cruse seen no accoUnt' of the sitinsho, oed in the:bnuking-hook, to hat heen .received by the Defendant, He had heard that Mrs. Atkyrts bath after hechusband's death, defivered a . large quantity..ol papers! tl4 : i.iyelinion, but he bad ; never inquired ,whether atining those papers there was any tiling• which: woutcLliave t:11)1ilioea how Mr. Graham had:atmounted for the money. Irle ad-, milted also thin he ha,d had liiJiis poy, .ssion, before Ile preferred thq.accouht which shitwed t h at m r „ bad accouttiFtl . for the List three stun s Mentioned , in the indittnfekkt. Mrs.:Atkyns, y:as,,also t he' uw rely, stated that t h e had tlittlt,ted her I;t;iis to Mt. Plo - 0, , den, and Iciti ,icteti by - his ativice. r:•SirNLCAtiy (;)1.1135 - said, 41,141. , , it tV;V; ro, , itlicr his duty, ;..or prnyttio,:, c , tr , inclimition, to 0:, the propriety or'inipi,trio.ty: of any Gl :I[Lttl . tii '. . 9)0" . toi.t.J. Mr. Plots Was at tiocrii ,to aS pleased, but he t'dinigh; it 4 tatty he: ow,;(Ltl:e pro; ks6ion, , to State pitOcly, tsiitt t Was COII4IIOII tor Cietttlemen so to iuix t!i2iny;,!ivei 1.1104 I.:Vt4yis'• Colleerns as he had done. ,I t oat conniion for . a, barrister., .alter : 114,drAttliati indi&tnient, te, g. .befOie the Grand Jury :6'; a witn;::is in huppoA of it; 'wither 1011)11“ , n but lan& lily 1.)11 Of all atnirney, as Mr. l'fowdi ; :u had done o n fi lo , c'oct,v;.try, dutlei of a b3rri!tter :ma i.ittortte":, were 'kept separate. li t then' dirt)' the fit Cll'..- ral deletwe of hit chtint, the tnuircut wihcit made it evident th.tt tli iii wait'' not the sirallest orroupd tor the roficentiofi helittetred in the po l u recl te , .1115,' that Mr. Plow.den knew ,Mr. Graham had tulHy accounted v/ith Mr. Athynti, A nd ,that he iivd , (.1 by an ilitft6on to intimidate Mr. Grahap jilt , ' a ( .)I'lll,l-i,:ii(ci with Certain proi)o- biClOll 5, 'LAW A,TTORNEV (i:!,'.":1 , ,11 A 1.. df:.1111nellAt.:11 the pro fieQui 'tort .. 1 / 4 ,;1111i11 1)1 . 03 . Ca.thatp having for thirty ycal . , done evtly thirp,t; to pi ~,,1 6 e0 the i n t e rest of 'Mi. aokl Mrs. Atkyoq, anti t.avirlg tti - fad iteett tho coemis io the elf ~(.lyeFic lit 0t , • t thyir tic! coi,rge, said, w,is 04. 01,s1;re 11141,0 It; he had never n turtained a doLOit .1 , , to there , ,iktl.t, 'tut he was i - obt • ansti on i about an ;.:ctiutttiu--01 t object was to p4.tce, his cli.;:tit before =the oald, 'as he destrved to sttutd.. ".. Ile wafi persuakl that no inzi:o vvt r went clearer Ott of 4 Court of iusti(..re Ili ut Mr. (.ittt.aln would do . b ;he VCRYIL:I of the Stify uptol t;ceasion, ent»awiltea tcrs s trt ! t)o'y on the - accuracy t f (..;rahatiA's aeCotllitS late hilt. Atk3;ptia, awl of his friendship and kindness to - him, add the Attorney-General was astonished that any man, or any child, could have possibly imagined , that the sums stated in the indiatnent could belong to the trust account. He was proceedingto call WiinesSuts, when Lord Ellenborough, addressing himself to Mi Darrow ?. stated, that if he thought his titpu 'could -be profitably occupied in "addressing the Jury, he—would willingly hear him, but having seen the accounts, and what they contained, le was On .vinced no two persons in Court could entertain two -opinions upon the matter. He had interposed less in. this case than he otherwise would have done, in consequence of the great importance of the inquiry to the Defendant, but he considered it that to pro ceed further in this case, would, now be an unneees." sary waste of time. Mr. GARROW said, that if after the cause had pro ceeded so far, he .had not received impressions simi lar to those of his Lordship, he should think he ought to retire from his professional duty on the ground of incapacity.. 'With the impression he en tertained, he was convinced, that if he was to address . the Jury with a view to any different result than that of the Acquittal of the Defendant, he should exhibit only his own vanity and arrogance. lie should re gret to 'make any address that •could by possibility, Atave the etli-a of throwing the slightest stain on thd chtiratier of Mr. Graham. . . Lord ELLENEOROUOU observed, that ,tlie Learned Counsel for the l'rosecutrix had behaved very can didly and honourably. He had discharged his duty to his Client in seeing the case made out to the ex tent of the materials. 'His Lordship then censured in severe language. those who advised 'ilk prosecti• lion, and observed that if common pains had been taken to investigate the accounts, it would have ap 'pared clear that Mr. Graham had condwled self with honour and integrity, and with the greatest and most successful Ittentiotl,,to the 0-K i iis an d in terest of Mr. and Mrs. Atkyns. . lie conceived, it unnecessary to detain the Jury, but should dismiss the case with this observation, that Mr, 'Graham had b.en most hardly treated.,. The Jury, without 'an instant's hesitation, pro-, tiounced a verdiLt of acquittal. . , . . The trial continued nearly five hours, and was, during the whole time, crowded..to excess. On the Bench were seated, as friends .of the . Defendant,, the Earls otDerby, Macclesfield, and Carhampton ; Lord Henniker, Abel , Moysey, ,Esq. and Master Stanley, and a great many Gentlemen of distin&ion, friends of the Defendant, were present in CoUrt. SMITH V. HEADNELL. This was an aajon against the Defendant, wito is principal Clerk in the house of Smith-, Payne, and Smith, upon . theitat. & Geo. IL which enaets that all persons who.shall have received any money or per, sonal estate, from' or in trust for any Bankrupt, and WhO shall not give an account .thereof. „to the QQm.,-, missiotters or Assignees of 'such Bankrupt, wijhiu forty-tvva days -after the 'bankruptcy is publist.' ed in the Gazette, Shall frirfeit i,OOl. and also., double the sum, or double the valued the proper. ty so received... The. Plaintiff was? Assignee of perSon , Of the natne cif Parquet, a reelifier. Of spirits, and the Defendant, who had some acqnaintance ,had received from • him 1501: and also 2001. upon trust to transmit it to Madame Parquet, -kis mother, 'at. Asque, nett; Lisle, in Flanders. Par quet becoming a bankrupt, it was some time betore he disclosed this fad, and upon • being., applied to, Mr.'Beadnell immediately rendered an account, and paid 'the :money over to the..4ssig,nees. Lord ELLF I NHOROUGH said, he should be sorry it shotild gt, abrOad that any'persun shotild remain un punished fur conniving at a concealment of a Ltni•- •rupt's etteds, an& therefore be would prupbse that a verdia shOuld be taken for the I°4)l' penalty, with it: nominal penalty for ,the double. amount of the sum received. Tois case, be observ ed, was an extraordinary one, and there cobld.not be ale, 'Slightest supposition that the Defendant meant to connive at any trawl, but. nevertheless he had incurred the penalty of , , . Mr. GAuttow, for the Plaintiff, readily acquiesced, and stated, that it roust not be understood, that he meant ie:insinuate a»y fraud on'the part u t the De fend:nu. Thii is the first klion_ ever brought upon the Statute.---Verdict for the. Plaintiff. • Ditcotiau# x• • THE LORD MAYOR AND'ecHiPORATION OF LONDON V. MAT ON LONG, ZSQ. TREASURIR Ol THE LON- DON DOCK COMPANY. -- ' Ti ii iw a ; cis .1,1 i dn: brought by the , Corporation Of Loildon iwaitist the LandOn Doelo'Obtrtpittry; dalin- Mg, in various eolints, the • privilege'•Of optiointing iln officer to fulfil thy' oectip:ition-of' glinger of all 4 . ities, oik, and oiher gisng(-able articles,-rioting. ‘vjihin the Ciiy of London, the Port , of' said City, d'ol6.liberties tifereof, alledging that the said •1111:1( Cbitilflitly l'ild takh fri)ny them this their tight i - ; :fiyr this deplivatidn' they claimed nominiti.-darnkiteh;•in order to entitte t he'll' Yl , fort hey recoftipense' from die Coininissioners• ot'Compensatioth : ''• ' Air_ 'AvronNE:t:-Gi.:NvitAt,, Mr. GAlutoly', Mr: NNOWLYs (the (;ciiiiinoty Serjeani), and 1V1r,..-DAnf ,' Olin 'argried the ease on , ' behalf of-the Pittitnitt's ;r 1 7 1r,ISerjensit ilr.Tr i Mr. l FloutoNifil,' 4 and Mr.-E-I•Aii ritio:;; -, A fppoiled tt rights'of4iie'DefendantS ; nod 3 fatinn the m u lti o a' ty tkatic*,' iiand the exainitin thin of :in t,T 4 eieti 1•t tit ii'itillMfi•ot - Parliatiteut, the Court it.ve re' Oiaillied In titis; iiiireAtAtlon 'ft - din 'Milo iit the morning till twciiif the nfternSoti: ' ' !' Lord ' Et;r:r, NE 0 1106 Glfi l in ' lidditiW rttg• the 'ltityv OW:erred' the Plaintiff,' • fileaCWsifrtlint ' theiri rigthu t he' ex e cation of this offree'w4t fotifyil elf - Ay pon 4 Chs rt ter . u,ranteit ttf them in the -time• of itclw int the IVtlt; When thetorporatiorfot 'London iPaid the 'midi Of I'oool. :Wiiir;ll, no - doubt, in former times'. VkiaS . ibCkOrii:d very Colisidirable; for that ' and , 'ether iifiyilttes, all contained in ,the same - charter': j'lle worth of that Charter certainly only mentioned the Office of gauger " within the City of Landonf but Other piiiits of it expressed dick intended privileges in different ways, such as '' the libertie3 ;hid 'fon ehiSeS of the City of . London," withotit mentiWing the City itself, and soinezirnes " the City, and Port 'of the City," without mentioning the liberties and franchises; the question, therefore; *as, wl.ether I - the Crown, by these different phraies, meant one and Ithe same thing ? . Under these cirelithigatiCei, it wzts important to consider what' had been the usage and t custom in reg4rd to the execution of the office Li Lti ; Tinted y ItscoAip Hivalis, of No. 4, Mattlott.court, tioW.stfeet; 4 At the StIN-Oritiert No. 112", Strand; where 4dver tisements, Orders question, since the time of - granting that Charter, either by written documents, or by the testimony-oft those who had long executed these duties, i'irbe oath,. of office which these gangers Were accustomed 'to take expressed that they were ' td'give a true ae c nint of forfeitures on all tuns or pipes of wine, honey, oil, &u. imported within the City Of Lyndon and Liberties a the sante. - It was, to be suppo'ied, therefore, that this oath had been originally impo:fed at the time of the creation or the office, so that it was . a contemporary exposition tea the part of the Crown, who granted that office, and tended to skew what they meant-in the Charter. Then, as to the usage; it had, perhaps, gone 'rather further than ,their right was maintainable, but .it was material to ,consider it in regard to their various :privileges, in order to sheW the distinoliOn between those to be exercised Only within London, and those within London and the liberties thereof In re gard td one of their rights, that of package of woollen cloth, skins, &c. which was extended to the Liberties, franchises, and suburbs of the City, no particular extent was assigned 'to those liberties, and therefore they were left to suppose that it was Co-extensive with the functions of those offices, not only without the walls of the City, but even beyond the place in question, where the Docks were ereCled. No argumeet could' be drawn from the 141st clause, 'in the Compensation Aa, saving all the rights of the City of London ; the words of which were cer tainly drawn up very , generally,'and did not allude to the right in question along with others ; but in i deed it might be deemed unnecessary to look' for saving words, in an ACt, ito part of, which divested them , of their right. t'hi'st'hi'sappointment to the office of gall ger seemed neter to have meant by the, AO to have been, taken away, for it would have trade particular mention of it, as well as other offices, such as that of tackle-porter,. ticket-porter, &e. The ,firat.witeess (Mr. Fowler) had produced the oath of office, which he had been long accustomed to take, and which ap : - peered, contemporary with the creation of the otlice itself in the time of Edward IV. and seemed to giVe the grant a larger construCiion than the charter; but he (Lord Ellenborough) ' thought it was not suscep tible of that broad constrnetion. It was true that the 4,:t of the Uth of James gave ikdescription of the beuedaries elate city, and also described the boun daries of the port 'as extending from Yelden to Staines, but the Liberties of the city bad yet no dis find boundaries assigned them. Another witness (Mr. Strickland) had told them he had been employ:- ed as city gauger at the• Greenland Docks for thirty years, ar.d no person had ever claimed that•privilege, or obje6ted to his officiating in that capacity. An other witness had said, he had been in the custom orgauging for many ycat% between Blnekti kirs bridge and Greenland- , Dock, on both aides of the river; without ever experiencing any interruption.— Anothpr witness had known goods gauged as low .doWnaS beTtford; AVhiehlwei certainly even beyond s t - V es h t t t o n i i i g y h t o b i e o t t l i e w e r me v t i l t - ri et e i s e s l e i s be h r ti t d ies s o i v f e t il he e c g i t t?r. oiy , ex tensive boundaries to the liberties, and the charter, irtipeaking of the privilege of Weighing'coalS, !had alla.:exteede(l it from the-Bridge of Staineki,.to.wards the west, to the Bridge of London, and theece.to Veit* towards the sea.----On the part of the De felaiht, izitiny observations had been made that we're lit tor Consideration, such as that the Docit3 vere not itteindol in• theb, extenis i'tkia"oriheat by tißprelkarte.r.,--- Tfeit the Ai:t of Henry 111. I)lnited the privilege tot be gauging wines and Oils hidtight tó the eityof London ' for axle; and itsucli a 'r'o'wer as that elMmed had '• been granted by, the Crown, it would entirely Oeteitt t he.oltie6ts 'of itubsoluc_nt Aa,„ which went to alio securing of private property two, melestation and in trusions by ereaing these Docks, atidintosn'tdther ree,elatiOns. It.waa true that the.Char.t, r. did nIA giVe' more extensive words than applied to such goods as were bought' Within the city . but then the eon teMporary oath and th,:- subsequent usage seemed to eXtend the pia% iLge to 'the liberties- Of the:eh); ; which liheilies were proved to Comprehend the place in question. . Although the statute of tjett,.: - pnly 'went to oils and wines, yet the grant ext,.ended„to all gangable articles, and there did tint ileent to exist any impediment iti ihri ertala4l:td. replete the Custam- Jennie and Excise-44P0 in this Nowa% whei . e,,lta poweritad never been questioned. As to the power of the Gown to interfere thus with private property, it might Ikia said that the Cro — wn ••• a1a9.011 . • in aerest.in that property, had the priVilege,.tn Ace that itio fraud , was commuted, and theretne. it mess sary-they should bite a right to appoint per:4ollS to - o.lter into. all..aicks ',arid legal Quays, In under to igange all gaugable corutnedities.. 11, however,. they were of opittiou that the office in question becaMe extintruistred I the suriseqnent ACfsbf Parlitireent,. thieu the Raint moonlit lose their right Of coMpun sande-. Nnthing its the Dock Act seemed to militate' against then :existing right ; and :therefore it' they (the .Fiery) milted with him in thia'.Ppioloo.. 44 1 as It, what he had stated regarding the contemporary:: oath, and the prole evidencelhr theetinstradien of the contradietory clauses of the - Charter, they Urould . tint' a'verdia in tavnitt c , f the' P1;611013, for : as, as nominal damages, .with,costs. Verdict for the Plaintilf, damages 1)1:,,,q905,495. which entitles them to lay claim to ednaPensation under'the bock. 44, . • • ; - ' . iiNtr.rnA:v ttimPsosr.-_ •. • This witi an action against the ptioprietor of one of the Metingham stagecoaches to London, to recover eutopeosation for an injury onstined by the Plaintiff by reason of the coach .oVertnrniug. Mr, to,tixa.-for the Defcndant, .made two objec tions ,toright o I?litintiff's f nelion , Tirst, that he had uot OfticieptlY pfovcd the. accidr..l4 tool place duo' fiat negligent:o.pr inattcntion of the drier and. ti l at,thy' : Delettdatit ba c i Already paid 7001.,pn account of lhis accident. . Jury, hOwev,er,jotiod a- verdict of 1.501 da magces for the Plaint& , Bank 'Stock, 22,5 Navy S per Cent. iier Cent. 1797, resit '5 per Cent. 4 per Cent. Soli 3 per Cent. Keit. 62i 3 per:.t. Con. Bank L. Ann. t 7 Ditto Short Ann. QUEENIS-SQUA it E.—Yesterday three young men, belonging to the Chimick Volunteers, were sum moned by ,their Commanding Officer, before P. CoLourtoult, Esq. for negle6t of duty in the said coups ; when they were fined the sum of is. lid. tbr each of their non-attendance, , according to the regulations amongst them, and the penalty besides. f_T:; H N ALL.;—Yesterday a person, tytnied Glad- I win, was bro,iJii before the Sitting Magistrate's, I h irged With 'fobbing his 1118$1Qr, Jameii Stars, a res:Jint it t ItherViiite, of a riniiltity of bid cuits, and Avas ,omtlred to be sent on bod..d the,:; • Sarak - 'Pa It er was. ali o charged with havittg rubbeciLßinfiniiiiLimitarn of 164.iind is cOntatitted for.re-exatitination. . - . . John I:ii 4 , , g wai likewiie brotlgilt up to the aboye 011 - ice,.-f( - )r triOng . ,On Sattlr‘i.).,. ::,:ilt, robtyed W 0). ..: tioadbarti; residing at N.). L6o, fl,.a.l,:irii Iligh-stidi',.' of: a piece.of pork ; :Ind' iscuintoitt:4 till Molicia-Y--' ne%t, when he will 13,1 brought .up a:,iiii for re-etcu mipat ion. ~ - NEII S. ' HULL, iIIiCEMZER Arrived—the Peter:44d Ma%nus, tr,ll; Merpel ; from Gede ; front IZig. ; COk t win St. PecCrOafgh; and Drabwell, from the ' I:ARTfIS. . • On Werlarsiby last, lit Nlacibarough-street, Dublin, the Lady pf C.ptain Lytet, Drajkootti„ at a.Son'und licit. On Suaday LiSt, Ilarlyfard-plate, tienainAt(ih. rill 7 . Lady or Captain Naton, or the Madras - Artilltry, at a Son aud Heir. . • On, Friday the with tat. near 'Waterford; the Lady tic ' AlqicAntWr Ifawk, Esq. of a Dtaughter. Lately, ia lkume-stze..:t, Dublin, tit.: Lady at Nlsjor lia• bars, of d-litugnter. „ MARRIA . n. of Le u t k el e y w , C h h it zle ac. b E ci v : clausMet:;f ' - ' ' • On Thursday the 26th ult. at IVis•ttiorpe, lames WotsleYl Esq. of Worksop, Nottinghamshire... ' • on Wednesday last, at Bath, in the .ostlt yeaitor her age, Mrs. Minshalt, wire of John MThstiall, -Ea.q..aS ( sjan .s ` l , l sister to the tate Lord Craven, ant aunt to the preszot On'the 2.lth ult. at Carrickinacross, aged is )•ear; eldest daughter of,litninnry Evalt, r 3 q• I '- Lately, at C;arravactint, In theQueeies County, liel atu, Mrs. Fawcett, )vite of George Fawcett, Esq. • On Sunday, in Boswell-court, Anis We), aged so, all't. ti free days sickness, i r l o a t ao l t ' g a h t i e ; b l i :u 4 ;i t l a r d , l i t t c :l t g r 4 s 4 , 4 . ti t ti e tr w h, d grs si . ) : 1 13n i e gt, j t re. i l t i t' c r t ho7';'2ltei a.'%tie3rGif)Qr. PR IC E. OF STOCKS Morning, 7 min. 53 3b? Ships at Market. Nov. jo. as Newcastle z Sunderland Dec. 1., 4S Newcastle S Sunderland z Cinders 14. I NewLastle i S u nde rl anti Cinticil tp:ll,l)ett by WILLIAM A Rkil Glk SCRIYPS. South Multon-stAtet, CroiVenor•squar4; or tite Paper, I Alters for. tilt: Milor, &c, (post-paid) • wait be addressed; YESTEIDAV. :144 Stock. I Exchequer VIII% 3s. 1S• ASS pr Ornitioin, pr 3 per Cent. Oeferrett, Imperial 3 per Cent. 611 Ditto Mtn.. Con. for,Openhig, 63. E 64 , NIGH WATER AT LON)) ()N liitlVGE, To. Nit) ROW. after 9. j Afternoon. 35 min. attcr 9. -.v04 LONDON MARK.LTS, RETURN OF %MEAT' IN MARK.LANE, Isy Nlcssrs. Ca sLo awl NI ALp4 4, Meal Weighers. • .-; • Including only from the 23d of Nov. to t!la 2 Sth of NO . • agree: 4)404 Att. , Z QtlartetS at, 74i °EI igs Quartors at 655 04 2 59 --- - - -at 7 04 .76 ---- at 4)0 o i' ' / ------; at. 710 od 26J -------- 1 . at 634 Oi& ------ at ,vs chi 12S ----L-;- at 62i ddi lr ''' at 7,is od . 6 ^-7----"-, at 614 pt, at 61,ji a 223 -- at ( os o • 2i:7 . ---- at 05 od . 54 ------ at 4 SS) qd r• 38 6 ----- at 675 od _ 24)-------- at 55s od , lig ----!--- at 6os od Lia -----•-••••ist••s4 14•04 T0te,,39.0 QuAttuti.—,-i , vengl, 6,55. Is 4 -it'.l, . , ' ' os. fti.loyOtt. thini 4 litbt - ItetuTti:' ' t . . . . , , . A VETtikNI OF 'FCOII R, • ' Frain' NOV. 21; so Nov. I.7)lrcorci tturepchgt..(4ol.7e:,l,' Sacks. s. ti.. Sacks. ,s. ii. Sacks. ,2,.., •18 -6; o ‘-, it'd' ---:a 5/4 2,t) ;, - ;'• :.i -t.,.) a , . tr 59, 7 -- 55 (.) i ) .....,..44 43f 354) ---- st'o . ISalt ---55 a t 72 , . ql4 l -.).- 5 , Qi . : i4?•i: - Tr... S4'9 I .. 10 „-: 23 ---. 'sl) 6 1 4'.), - 53 0 I 15 ---- 41 -," 664 ---• , 5 , 0 'a' 1 i 3c:m•-;-1 - sz ti I, . ; ~ ,,,: i , ...g-Ir Tut.ll-14,4zi Sack's. -.-tvera)., , e 56N. old. pet Sucii.' 03. 4id. per Skck higirer than last. wi:L:k. .i ~i ce r 0 ' tV EST r. RN COUNT,/,..,Y MARKETS (last Sveg.hll -, 7- 1.. Wtfat. - ' t):Ats.. Newbury I ;:s to 73i I 32 $ 0 :t to 4o i e. I 1 2cS od to 34. ;SAltsbury lOs to 68s Os od to 30 od 1 2 51 i °l t° 3 , 4 1 1 •BasingAt9ke 1 535 to 7 93 I 37*. od•to 4,15 od [ 495 *Lk /9 li- Winctititer I b;,, to 68s 1 375 . 0(1 to 49s o:i j3os 9d to 3 Devizes i 54s to 7os 114 v od to 4os 0(1 , ' l 9s o d t° ts l i "hulliastif l'bo. 10 ps i 30s od to 4os ad 1',;,05 , 0d , tti'V. ~...,09 PRICE Or IMPS. a.os. rocKt:rs• Kent, '5l. 0). to 61. is. I;.ent, 51. c.,. to 71. as. ,5t.14,1x, 41. t ss. .Lost. tos. Sussex, Si, os. tv st• 113 1 1. 1 ;' Lsseig 41. los. to 51. SS. I FM - 11114111, 71. o>• 1 0 9 1 . 46!t . , ~. .N VG ANL) 1.E.-NDENiIAI.I. .I'lA Iti,El' , . , :! liy,ttie,Carcasc. t '6(l;' . ',Peet - , 2..i'.4.4. to 4s. otiv vo.il , 3s. o d. 6 ss. Qi. . Mutton as. LA. to 4s. 2d. I Pork 3s. 4.t. to 4i•P-'...., (.904 t)f.LEAcritsit-tpq W.) AT LEADIOIii. Butts,,.; 0. 1 b• eacA - • "`"`l ' ' Dila) ci:to b's th . caelt ` 2. 0;• - to Meitiabts' 1141;k0, . _ to 0 7 117 tV , 13 t 1 esil+,, ~lulgs 7 , . t• 1.7134C11 • 170. ,to 3> ,416. tbr cutting ty,t. Ditto, 4; to sons, - Ci l lt ; kitts, to,-,440). ;cid. to jet,. uFr , r.' ' so 14 b lu.• I. to per Ib.• Dal°, 7o to 30. to 30, itcr ,` 4eals (Crete:and:l i. to ,att. t I pet DOJO.' • TatinzA /tone Hides I ) • ) ; 3• •,., RAW tit ohS, Best Heifers - And StAerslis. st. o r- I '•s iry,ts. 30. 04. to p. iittiwn; 3s. 44. to zs. 64, I too. 0. l‘ *„ ' • shtt`p•Skins .2a od {to 3'' RicE O I TALL,wbv ! ,; • St. James's Market 4s. SO. TownTa,ll7gs''tqrL f r Clare Market 4s. hi. I Y'ettow Russia - 4'•° y . "thilvd"Pet Nuek et 43. 7 d. I W hite. do. —s. 04 1 J, 9h , pet stone of -------- Soap do. - -4. 695. 4 ' 0 2 • 4 • t3s. td. Melttok Slut' Average price 4s. ' Ditto rough 1 --a. Pi* GraVes 116. Od. Good Dr4o, 12 . 6 . od• Velkni , Soap, tins.—Ntottled, gos.- -(..urd, 94 3 . t . Price of Candles per dozen, tzs od.--141oulds St. lAAIES's 11.N.Y AIARKET, Dec. S. play, 41. I$S. : to 61., 6s. oit,—Avec. si. O'i." Straw, 11. od. to al. 2s. od.--Aver. 11. 193. 41., --- WIIITECHAPEL HAY MA'ItItLT. Hay, 4L od. to 61. Si. pd.—Aver , 51. 04..4 Clover, 51. los% od.- to 61. as. 61. 41•_,,c i' Straw. ti. oil. 'lO 21. .IS. rd.--. Alien. 11, 19i. our ' New 144 01. es. ficr COAL.AIARKLI . S ' id. 15 4t 47 5 od 6as o ti I ,tt 47$ 6,1 555 °A 36 at i 2, rql its 6 a d 7 at os 611 5 4A O I at 2i oit 4 0,1 IS ,at 51) 0 41 57.$ u-I, I at 5r s iict --5 0.4 1 at 26i od .—sl b --...-#' rM~i:, ti'