The Sun. — London, England, 1813-02-16 00:00:00

it, under the existing tritetti,!almost to exercise th e i r functions. • Theii were aware that by law, - no proceed to :India without licenses from ay. ; who, lie observed, were not in- the Taming them to such except )t the established Church. of NORFOLK remarked, it was the-first learning that the Directors of the East 'any were so zealously, attached to the Church as not to grant licenses to any but et th at persuasion. tion was then ordered to lie on the ta med: iiUUSE OF COMMONS, MONDAY, VEIL 15 . 'ls presented a Petition from 8000 of thita:As of Bristol against the Ca was read and ordered to lie upon Presented a Petition from the inha !eltryn, against the unconditional Re Laws atfeeting the Roman Catholics. to lie on the table. 'IIUQUTII presented a Petition from be .sild 16;000 of the inbabitauts of. the 4.4ol :inty of Lancaster against the Catholic Orde,reci to'lie upon the table. WENNIOUTII ELECTON. kiderinqu ATKINS informed the House, that ;)y .the; Committee sitting upon, Eketion, to inform them: that a ihme, of Lu ce was, in the course of found guilty of gross Prevarica" teport being delivered in, and the u n ti tqlo the Luce was ordered Th 'tttd to his :Majesty's prison.of New- . , BRE:VI! OF PRIVILEGE. ' II, R Legged leave to call the attention of , e to what he considered a gross breach _re' and he 'lainented that it became his leake complaint of such a nature; but tell a seat in that HOuse he would not indulgence giantecl tet the public, of Je deb ates of that House, to be converted lean s of abusing any one of its Mein ' attack of the same nature of Natibich he lind been made two or three upon him. Indeed, he seldom rose to !out giving ncc . asion to the Gentleman not,v complained, t o attack him (Mr. m the same way, The paper to which be • 'As The British Press. Oti Thursday lust 7t;tl to deliver his ()Pinion upOn the Vice ' • then before the House, and in a llinicd to, it waS represented, that he n wi t h arrogance of his own exertion s a reirtedy for the evil, towards Yinie" w " directed. It was also insinuated ,bservations were received by the House 11) ri at iglltei: and ridicule. (Lud ies f Mr.. Ta ylor erv l° ' then obs o cr ed, that It ts Wish to prosecute the business any fur " 411°1114, upon afilture• occasion, utly feel iihwielf called upon, in 116 ownto en ai lu # trig -or d ers forc e the t o f 'the the 'question being put f rom the Chair, the n an- Alt. Taylor meant to proceed, 4 0 nega tive, lad ou t -bujitiess uf lii I O' 4 of,-; AoniNGTO :4 obtained leave to bring xplalo kind amend the Loe4l Mil itia Bill to explaio aid amend the Local for Scotland. . stnumy CANAL 81L7... 4 11 01,... 1 ~. sd t ' 4 4. sir moved the second reading of the q uitr oi l / 4 3 , 4 ,reY Canal Bill. . After a tew . observa- Ilklfr 1 1 , t4 e nature of the Bill, . tt'Cei‘l44 SumNR ft inpved, as an amendment, t itiitp d , if "" ,l 3. !•` this day six months" be sub - Af tt t 'l4 the word " now- left. 41d, (1.11117:4:ie !,ilserratiOns from Mr. Baring! Mr. !1141,1„ At.kiits, Yir. narrytit, Mr. Peter Moore, ' 41 ' 5 e, tile flo * use divided— ' Po r tile Recued reuditig ...... ..32 Agoitist it .. 45 • . ! i ' Ti i , I, ' Ma.jurity....- ,-.-I3 ,' ` l , !.• 11111 r , , wiliv. 14 Was OE weer k• thrown out. ittlf. . 113 e will, ou :Wi.dr..esdny next resolve ir Into , .• , , tksi 4 :1 ,. 4 Committee on tkke Copper Exporta• ~, 18, 1 ititHrli , s , . ' j -.}Pf P - moved, ti t there be laid Attnrra, la i re !Is i t b 'le 11 0lre % , A , 1 ,,„, 1 . 4 ..11.4,..,..c0u n.. . t of all Foreign Grain te tt ito , i r°l) . _ (4- ted intk :, Great Britain and Ire,- ill a n- - .'e year 1 / 9 2' to 1812 ; ; ,1,„ . ,, 41 4 Flo . „.. as also of the .. ag Ne t In Lxported during , 3. 1 ( t o , the same period. ~,,, ,. .t Il i ' ' 1 4 gllve notice that be would, on the 4th ~t , ;trell ''. 344 11 nex t. 1 11 0ve for a Committee of the . . false on the Irish Tythes,. VICE-cit. NCELLOR'S BILL. 4 );Sil l . g O eStion being p ut t h at t h e S PEAKER i t o . 4 1i-, Chair ::,il•-tv,Aelt s ail, that in rising to -oppose the, :1441)4mi: the House, he, at the same time, 1 41.1 ta ., 1 4 itsfull extent the existence of the evil 1. tl:,rikiw.`was ell of sach.a nature as to demand it, b 5 remedy. The ;round- upon which ( :te edtl ied this Bill was; that in its consequences I :itar rt , ol , l 4s it appeared to him, to disengage, the f-tide i . ii ` ,. ' ll ' from a portion of his duties, and to : ti cil, t ;' Q trtee, which . was both judicial and po ;tktpli t o aS it ought to be, primarily judicial, (!lpo.lZ3nri‘ly.,: political. Another ground for his - P th e e.v btu. berause it appeared to him that a t, d,v.,,5,i,i 44/eipinitted of, another remedy may t ' 4 ,,i g e : ~1 19 t 1i.,,b1e to any seriou s objection. ' In h'ler, : ‘i. ,,,,. 1 .!! ttid, that time Bill, if carried into tt I ,i ,:%'ll,l_ tikeriage the Chancellor from a t i ! e t , 1, 4(1 l it t -citifies there were two things which I ,,tt be an e,„°,ll,lelnplation-1. 'Would such un ti lt tr, f, 11 ,2: ',t,. and Idly, Was such an effect like (ti et ? s ' o w 6:l the measure were carried into ef ,iiP,.4 the „ ws - „,a, 8 he hatl attended to the debate ,IPuted „ n i e r t ,"{m, it did not seem to be mach - , okad be , 0 , tier side, ' th at tilt effect of the Bin tang be ~ renclerthe office of Chancellor pri htive 1/ ' 6ll tielli, a d tu r y 113 p o „ ibie n . he wattlit now state, as stilt from that betel. ,ver office beeosning-primarilY Pa th.„t , Y Person who heard, whether u lawyer v‘ittx.... 'elcilW tilut ill I tilt o tie r were modern times the, duties of L_ li , cor,nuorelely satisf.actory but spleptild. 141 NI 414 1 his ,judicial, bad a cha law racter of another nature, He was .the fir. . patron in jiitlicial appointments, and bad great v•eight in the selection of the puisne judges, and he could not but think the manner in which that power WAS ,exerted, to be the main reason why the seats of justice were filled in this country, in a manner unknown to the other parts of Europe. The selection always made of such fit persons to fill the seats of justice, could not arise from ac-, cideut. The effects of accident were varying and uncertain. It could not therefore but arise from some inherent cause in the character and consti tution of the Chancellorship. lie would ask what that cause was ? The person called to fill the , place of Chancellor was at all times the most eminent Lawyer in the country, because other wise it would be impossible to di'scharge the dit ties of such a situation.. tie must then have lived in habits cif intimacy with person:; most eminent in their profession, and his feelings as well . as his duty would naturally direct to recommend to the seats of justice such men as were fittest to till them. If such were really the, case, be would ask ,whether, if they hazarded a change in that office, they would i:ot also hazard a • change in the results that followed front it ? if that which should be primarily judicial were rendered pri marily political, he would ask whether there was not a probability that such would be recommended to the seats of .Justice as were best adapted for the discharge, not of legal, but political duties ? And when a laWyer saw that he teas likely to ar rive ut the head of his profession, not by legal learning, whether it would not lie an inducement to turn aside his attention front legal to political pursuits ? 'Would there not be reason to fear that the choice of judges would beintlitenced too much by political considerations ? The next inquiry to be made was, Whether, .in point of fact, it was likely to happen that the Chancellor would be so disengaged from his jadicial (hides, as to lead to such evils The object of the present Bill was nut to render the office Of Chancellor less la borious, but to provide some assistance for that part which' he was not able to perform. The Bill had in contemplation the relict not of the Chan 'cellar, but of the public. He. would now say 4 few words as to the question of the increase of business in the Court of Chancery. Until within the last twenty years the Chancellor was found to be 'fay adequate. to the discharge . of all his , du ties: Now, if the business was supposed to be doubled, it would follow that an assistant would not have sufficient business for the employment,of leis time. `The Chancellor had, not only to per form judicial but political duties ; and until the last twenty yearit he found time for the discharge of them both.; it followed, of course, that an as sistant, discharging may half the jtidicial duties of the office, must be in a great measure unem ployed. the truth, however, Mils, that the busi ness in the Court of Chancery was not doubled.— The measure of the increase was to be. taken from the actual accumnlation. In the first pear in which the accumulation of business commenced, there was only a small excess, which the Chancella at that time was not able to discharge. The next year a like measure took place, and there being no . opportunity for extraordinary exertion, the year being fitly occupied by the ordinary exertions ,of, the Chancellor, the accumulation went on to a greater extent. The csertions made by the Chan, cellar last year, were beyond any former example ; he sautetimes sat till tea o'cloi:k at ni'At. was no satisfttetory information in the repo'Aqs,. Whether the accumulation ;ad prOcceded for ten or twenty years.. He was disposal to think that the acenandation hod commenced twenty years back ; frig argument's sake, however; he would admit that it had been going on only for ten years, and Isa would ask, what time was likely to be oc cupied, in subduing thiS accumulation 3 In the: Court of Chancery the causes depedding were 130, in the noose of Lords 270, in. all about 400. If. one Judge was.called in to assist, the Chancellor could subdue this accumulation in one vein'; then the increase was as one to ten. His opinion was that and Judge could effect this object in the course 'of 'a ,year, even admitting that he were only to sit on juridical days, of whiph there 'were .abort two hundred sin the .year. The four hundred causes depending could not be all efficient causes ! There were, perhaps, „Gfty out of that number that were proceeded in for the purpose of delay. The Master of .the Polls, in the years 1810 and 1811, had heard: upon the avera.4-it three hundred and seventy causes, and six hundred .1.1. a fifty petitions. Ile satbut 120 days.in each year, and in fact not, so many. It might be said he had hut twenty juridical days in the year. •The,tother hundred nominal days were but' frictional parts Of days, as hew' hutfro.m six o'clock iu the eviining till ten. Now, supposing they could 'make 21)1) juridical clays in the year, in which causes should be heard by the Lord ChancellOr froni ten in ,the morning till four in` the afternoon, taking days of six hours each, if sueli an arrangement Were ' made, three, times time number of conies at present heard could be disposed of in the year: if -then 'he might assume that' four htindred causes could. be heard in the year, he was justified in saying, that were the change he proposed effected, instead of four hundred; twelve hunUed. could be got throngh With. But then it might be said, the cases brought before the Master of the - Rolls ‘v ere less difficult than those on which time Lord Chan cellor had to decide. Supposing, however, s three of the former to be only equal to one of the lat ter, even in that case four hundred might be dis posed of in the year; and theassistanee the Mas ter Of, the. Rolls might be entibledto give, Ina.king every allowance for the increase of business, would be ampl9 sufficient to remedy the evil. The arrear once subdued,,if the assistant Judge gave to the business. but . one tenth Of his time, it might be effectually kept down.. lie might be thought by some to be out in these calculations, but ad mitting thut . lte'svas, and that instead of a tenth part of the time of a Judge, which would not otherwise be employed, a fourth part should be required, what necessity was there for the present measure 3 The Lord Chancellor, if be bad sucli an offieer put under hint us this Bill went to en &jet,. Would he likely, with the best and purest motives, occasionally tea. sitmlc into indulgence, till ultimately his.. judicial character becutae a most forgetter. The piaster of the Rolls was an offi cer appointed-by the Constitution to render as sistance, to the - Lord Chancellor. , If the rd Chancellor wanted more assistance than be at pre sent lied, was it not natural for them to turn their eyes to this officer, to see if, by another dis tribution of his time, he could be made equal, ,to the task of affording tine assistance required. By the Coastitution, the Master of the Rolls was not required to attend the Prize and Plantation Ap peals before the Privy Council He might. then be withdrawn from these, and his place might be supplied by the Lord Chief Parbn of the Exehe- - quer. To 200 judicial days which the Lord Chan cellor might, have, the Master of the Rolls could be enabled to add 110.; and such assistance would be' not only ample, but out of all proportion more than was required, while the Master of the Rolls would not hew more of his time occupied than the other Judges.' It ought to be made as efficient a's possible. Additional services would of Course call for additional emoluments, cud •if .the arrears at present complained of at first encroach .ed on his time and east, he was sure he would be amply rewarded by the consciousness of having served his country.' In two years, the arrears might be effectually got under, and the business from that time could be met. without difficulty.— Having said this, it was not his intention to put his negative on the Bill, but us he thought it very desirable to pause Lelcire they committe4 -them selves to a MCll3llle o such importance, he would move, " That the House shoold resolve itself into the Committee on that day fortaig-4." Lord CASTI4RtAUIt persevered in the motion be had made fOr the Speaker's leaving the Chair. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman, it he succeed ed in convincing the House that the plan he (Mr. Leach) had suggested was Inner than that now before them (when the provisions of this Bill were fully developed in the Committee,) could put a ne /gative on it on a future day. To adopt the Man of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman before the . present Bill had been in a Committee, -would be to treat the Bill unfairly. In persisting in the. Anotion he had made, lie desired to be understood as in no way putting a bar to the consideration of the Hon. end Learned Gentleman's plan, but as • acting.from a feeling that the Bill before theta had not yet been put fairly in competition with it. In justice to his own opinion, be, however, felt it necessary to state, that he did not apprehend the j)lan of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman would. be found to supply ati adequate remedy to the evil acknowledged to exist. Ile objected to the argu ments used to show that the Judges would have a large portion of their time unoccupied. This was stated as if they were never actually and usefully employed but When sitti.ng in their respective Courts. He apprehended they were often quite as usefully employed elsewhere in preparing their judgments, as they were while sitting in their Courts The lion. and Learned Gentleman's ar guments had, not carried conviction to his mind. He thought, the,ehanges he had proposed would not furnish au adequate remedy. The House, he trusted; would not suffer their conduct to be at , all influenced by the lion. and, Learned Gentle man's plan at present. He hoped they would let the Speaker leave the Chair, that he might offer the clauses he wished, - to propose. It on ; the reading of the Bill it should appear that the lion. Gentleman's plan plan waa bett , T, the Bill could then be negatived, and the plan of the Hon. and Learned Gentleman brought, forward in a more rege,lae, and Reetise shape. Mr. Leacit,expliineil. • Mr. WEATIIEIIALL objected to the plan ,of the Han, and Learned Gentleman, as be was satisfied the Mastet.of the 'Rolls would not fr o nt eonsi det;t6olls. of his own personal eonyenience, with hold any service it might he in his power to ren der the country. He objected to it, as it would preclude the Master of the Rai from sitting in that House, andbenbjected to it, as it went to td:te the Master of the Rolls from the CoChpit, and to send the . Lord Chief' Baron there in : his plaee. The presence of that Noble Lard was required in the Exchequer, where, if be were removed, there would be two Law Judges, :led one of Equity.-- Such an arrangement would • make innovations, which would be found a greater evil than that Which was at present the subject of cnnipleint. With this view of the subject he coidd not vote for the motion of his Hon. and Learned'Vriend. `Mr. ABERCUOVW.f noticed, and, answered the objections made by the last Speekey, to the plan of the Hon, and . Learned (lentleman. He ex pressed himself happy to find the objections urged to it were of such a nature. as they were, and that no other grounds, appeared on which be thought it,his duty to oppose the plan:. He con chuloddibrimitaling to the.candmir of the Noble Lord , (Cuatlereegh) for time between the Com mitteeand the Repnrt Lr a mature consideration Of the meesure. • Mr. WE:ATM.:RAU. explained. Mr. IIoRNR, in a low tone of voice, signified his approbation of the Bill as a remedy for an it of great pressure and magnitude. Lord CAsri.vitE&Gil Najd,. he hid uo wish to lttwry the measure through the tiou,e. The coute of proceeding he should propose to adopt, if' the house allowed the Bill to go through a Committee, would be to delay the Report upon it till rriday, or this day se'unight, when it would, as amended, hive been a sufficient thin), in the hands of Members, • Mr. PoNsoNay signified his approval of.Altmtlay next for this purpose. Friday, he ob.,erved, would be occupied with other important businos. Sir S. Itommtv spoke in favour of the plan suggested by Mr. Leach, which, he said, had nothing new hi it, but simply proposed to have recourse to what was already in existence to remedy the evil in question. It would create ao alteration in the official functions of the Lord Chancellor, or of the Master of the Rolls. The attandance of the latter at the Cock-pit, now alleged as a reason against this arrangement, formed no part of the original duties of tat officer. it had only hecatne a Custom in late times. Lrt them t. 13 t tente a judicial officer to preside at the Cockpit, Nui re lease the Master of the Rolls for the performance of this new duty. Why might not the Members of the Privy Couaeil, whow early habits of life rendered them competent, why d.th not they at tend and fulfil these functions?. Why not the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster? Of 120 Privy Couttsellot*, it was strange that some one could not be found to do this. 'the Master of the Rolls, he maintained, had quite a different of in the time of the present chancellOr from that in any foriner period. lie nUkti diseharged doubitt the atiti, nailwheat the increase: of 'business in ., the Court of Chancery . wits spokn, of, tl:i fa, :t ought to be t liken intoeonsideration. cd tientleman then yomplinleut to Mr. Horne, from ‘vitOfe talents - It! antieipated , that he would hereafter soaks; a distinguished figure in the House. He went on to say, that, his real objection to the Bill was, that it would produce evils; not to be remedied in atttemptin,; to remedy a tentporary evil. Lu.. Lis up„inion, the salary attached, to. the office ought to he fool"e than 4`,000/. per, annum. It was true that th* kvits the amount - ofthesrilary of the Master of the Rolls, and it might seem that Vice-Chancellor ought nut tit have more. Nit- it ought to be Ft collected, that the reason why tha_Maitter of the Rolls bud not inure, arose entirely from the disinterestedness of that eminent' persou, who declined an augmentatkin at the dine an isz crease was granted to the , other He also objected to the power which till. C114:1.- cellar might give to the Vice-Chancellor to re verse the decrees of former Chancellors as' anoma lous, isnd greatet them the power possessed by the- Master of the Rolla. He acknowledged hirns,:if the author of the pamphlets alluded to as written by him. The subject he considered as insufficiently discussed, and he deemed it to be his duty to de• vote a portion of his time, occupied as a Was, to this "parpose. Some Honourable Gentleman had . asked, would they not have Masters in Chancery or Judges in that House? For his part be most say, that he had ever thought thi.t being.,Membera of Parliament rendered men the worse, Jiidges, and being Judges, the worse . Meinhi:rs of Parii4- ment. When the present arrears Were trot through; the office of Vice-Chancellor wo,ild sink into a sinecure, and thc way to it, instead of ' being through the rugged and laboriou paths of the profession, would lie throu;ol the more plea sant paths of this House. Before they created 'such an office, they ought to ascertain tlidt the Lords would do their parts towards getting the arrears of business discharged by earlier fftteUd ance in Appeals. On every account he was of opinion that the Coinmttee should be Sitspetti.!ed for a fortnight. Mr. Bxruurtst 'said the measure si9ol4: t he lowed tillfheitillt diSeltSSitn in all its sta;-:,. es, ;L:d then went into an argument of solne length., sheav ing that the services of the Master of the Rolls were not available for the purposes desired . 4 the Hon. and Learned Gentleimin opposite. By cus tom he was established' as presiding at.the pit, and as for calling for the Chief Judge front another Court (the Exchequer), where the*buSi ntss was nearly as much in armor as in the Court of Chancery, the scheme appeared to hint to be absurd and incapable of application. He gene rally defended the principle upon which the was founded, and gave it hit warmest support. Mr. .TErlllOl complained of the iniputation against the practisers at the Bar of the Court of Chancery. Nothing could be more unworthy the eharactet of these Barristers than the suppositfOn that the servile deference which they paid to the Bebch was so great, that it prevented thew from haavirli the matiliness to protest against any abuse which might. exist in that Court. To think that Minister •. woithi ever appoint any person twthe Bench of the Court of Chancery wile) Wits not fitk. ted . to such an otEce.was abintrd ; it was next to impossible, and was a phantotp which could exist only in the imagination. No man would ever gd. cept (at such en office who was incapable of per. formin: , ,the duties of it. Sir S7.OIt.TF.L 1t0411.1,Y explained. . After a few:wOrds from Mr..SttiThen, Mr. M:u. ryatt, and ;fir. Simeon, the question being put, the amendment was negatived, and the original question carried. rite House having then resolved itself iuto Committee on the Bill, ‘ Mr. Courtenay in 6% Chair ; Lord CASTLEREAS4II prOpOsCit. several CIRLISCI to the Bill, which were tarried. ',they were, that the salary of the Vice-Chaneellor should be 50001. per annum ; 2tool. of whieh to he paid 14 the Lord Chancellor trout the emoluments of. his Office, the remaining moiety to be paid out of the Suitors, om Dead 'Ca4li Fund ; •that 600001. be invested for the purpose of covering the latter moiety. Mr. R. GORDON here observed, that it would. be better that the salary . of the Vice-Chan cellor should be paid entirely by the Lord Chtrn. cellor. The other clause propwed by Lord. Castlereagh was, that neither the Vice-Chancellor nor any of his Officers should be allowed to take any fees ex* cept salary. Mr. PONSqNB" Y expressed the pleasure which he felt at the different- elanses which had been approved of. He thought that matt r..r.s had at last been arranged in a,.vay Which could not fail to command the approbation olthose who had at firt opposed the. bill. Ile 60;14 ftilt the ju risdiction would be, so excellent, in consequence of the manner in which the buiiness had been concluded, that it would certainly put an end to all litigation,—(.l/widt.)—There . could only re trilliLl a little innioble corittnyessy about who had a right to this, and Who had a right to that. Ije congratulated thUse C-..ntlimien who had opposed the bill, on having it last bad matters adjusted, in a inanner.so completely satisfactory to all,coa- cerited. Mr. PaasTQN, adverting to' the Suitors` Fun;l, out of which it was intended to pay one-half of the salary of the Vice-Chaneillor, thought that some meninres Should he taken to restore the property in that fund to those peOems.who had a right to it. For tkci purpose 'it Would be proper to appropriate part ut the fund to discover the per sons who had a. claim to any part of it. Mr. Simeon , said a few words, exprelive of his stir .e that the Hon. Gentleman should not know that such a plan as that which hp propo3ed -vas impracticable. Mr. PRESTON 4:epliqd. Mr. COURTZNAY agreed with his Iron. Friend (i%lr. Preston), in the opinion, that as the pto. petty of the Suitors' Fund was unappropriated, a great proportion of it might be distributed among ,hose who a right to it. Mr. Samos ti4t4i4 that only the interest arlsilg latlia, found it 1 ItipOlisibie to krdshipi 'seti t \il i alCollltl proc e COMpaily ; 4 bit Of grantit Itt'i were of th 001; fikeDiike of ,qo l c t ile of hi 3 lea • A 1114 Conl ' :rip tan I .oMlbliAle i d Chi 40° 0: 16 gy.4a tin , but If u tile Peti t i on 1 1 'ilk 'ildjo„r lle. )Iy , ' 44 . lICY !tit ' LO :i :•-• „,‘ 4 1,104 LitVIS Of if iL lie i n babiti t i 'k ' ' 117, 1't Cl ailnS..". i Alilt. . ' li. lir ' SW AM ' Atir ' lti Of 1 - ) . : 1)1 IN, ellt p(,• :, o u i r the i . „, 0), : ,r,,ereil to ti ~14,:nd Y4,41;t0 ( t '' , el p e ktl4 and 1 Il li , tilkir 4&, t tn,int i 0 , .Ortlei 0 1 - ,4,i , !,, l t , wa : illermq HI ti,, sv d ilect, , 1 ta . t,Yttio ut i, ~,. , kit tot fif e nail ,Al.io xaltinLitit) ' f it 1. Oa t ,Itt ll''..ttio,, rite of . t,, F. vat 1 io ..,...,tee. coutrnitl iii . ',. -: , Air, p„ bii fe , i VI, : i 1f. : (1, 410 a 1 00'.•4 4 ( iiiilii eu ` t ' ) I d i e 1 .4, hty to 1.1 ,e , a i i , 4 ,. it " he l h a e k i t e i ' I ' .1 }kV the ill( at I. i 111 r) the ii 1 , en .., --1, 0 the ale ri 01 , t'4, lit :t'ti: . 1 i ) . l t , en tilfdain ' I *M3 Litt up o r, lk with ° - ( ,tiki - 11 , 0„ ,s , tit .inn : t v h,'", 'rt: II 1 OS li', ' / In a l( 1 1 ' 1 i i: i ' 4s ed w A ., ~ '' vvutared ti -I Ileellor. 1 ~ -.. , 4 T - 4 all a , ' per a: , it , l „'lli 0 ,' . 1 4) 11e11 % ' ' '..t)en re a 1 lit „.4, , I ' ll wai . r tt , i l ;is Qbz3el 1,, in solid lap , s,re:c(l!) 4P, ,' 1 wit hi s ,„ Or , ' 4 , h ''t II '( .''..if t‘ently el. e , to t I li, ~ , i ', 94°H the 1 j 1, i tA t ,` l 111 tile .If le ' ' e i ,` . ..ZAtopp e h r•A Y: 14 I j:Ak t y it",! h et wIll„ - :t liii:' a I till .- -get -- tJ,Ii., ,: 10 MI) It r • i ~ 01 . et,;,.; ' ,, 44., ~