The Sun. — London, England, 1813-06-19 00:00:00

Russia . As to thettecnnd consideration, be sb 6 uM maintain that as a question of morality, Great :Moth' was justified in acceding to the Treaty, between Russia and Sweden ; a's to the poli(4y of agreeing to it, that would come to be argued af terwards. Was not G'eat Britain at War with Denmark ? Were not Danish seamen on hoard of French ships ? Were Jtot the ports of. Denmark shut against this country ; ami did she not em• •ploy every means in her power to annoy our trade Being at war with 1) nmark, we had as much .right to conquin. ,Norway, as nny part of the do minionsofany nation witim whom. we might he at war; and of course we had an equal right to assist any of our allies in making such a conquest. On the subject of the claims which Swelea might he supposed to have on our co-operation, 110 would retci to the way in which she had lost Finland. ,She lost it on account of her refusal to agree to the treaty of Tilsit. It was not auy,new thought to have Norway added to Sweden, for troops had been sent, tinder Sir John Moore, to assist the Swedes in taking Norway as compensatiou for the loss of Finland ; so that Great Britain had for merly entered into an engagemeut to assist Sweden in obtaining possession of Norway. Ile did not mean to say, that subitquent ceents had not released this country from that engagement ; but he would say, that the attaelunent which had beets constantly evinced by the Swedish people to wards Great Britain, was a strong claim ,upon as to renew tile engagement. He could nut conceive that any loan would. main tank that Great Britain was not Justified in malting common cause with Sweden against Denmark. • As, to the importance of Norway, be believed that next to the Penin sula there was no country on the Continent which it Was so desirable should be kept out of the power of France ; and this on account of its ex tent of coast, its numerous harbour's, and its other. maritime resources.—He stated this, be cause if the question was as to interest or policy, it was certainly the interest of this country that 'NOrway should- be in possession of that power which was most independeut of France. If they were to consider the question as one of policy, what would of necessity be the policy of Denmark ? As long as the power of. France should re Bala what it was on the Continent, Deurnark would inevitably be dependent on naoce, and consequently Norway while in the possession of Denmark, would likewise bent the disposal of :France. Time inclination of Sweden was to be independent of France.- But what was the case with Denmark ? She had shewn herself to be so much attached to her German dominions, that, in order to preserve them, she enters into a league With France. Although Swedish troops ,hatl not been engaged with the French army during the last campaign, they had been so disposed as to keep in check a large corps of the French. By time Treaty, Russia was to place a corps at the disposal of Sweden, but. at the very moment when Buonuparte was advancing to Moscow, the corps, under the command of Wittgenstein, was set at liberty by Sweden, and bad joined the main .army of Russia. The safety of Russia was certainly owing ti, the spirit of the people, but•the destruction of the French firilly on the Beresina was certainly owing to. the junction of the corps Wittgenstein. It was to the disposition of Sweden to make common came with Russia, that the successes of the Russians were in ii great. degree to be ascribed, and he line:w that the Itossian Government flit that it was so, and wished that the British Government should become a party to their engagernents„ tinder these eircurnstances.negociations were he gun last whiter, and the priilelpie on which Government mUrreed to treat with Swede's was the stipulatioa that the first operation should he on the Conti nent ; and it'was on this ground that they coo ccived that the measure was warranted .by soon(' policy Denmark lead never manifested any in clination to throw off the French yoke, even when opportunity offered. Unites these circumstances was there any reason why Government to have refrained front assisting the Allies of the country ? Were they to have done AO front rim tivesm of tenderness to a Power acting as Denmark had done ?—there would have been neither sense itor policy in sparing a Power whose disposi- Coos were such. At one time a' disposition• to peace had been manifested by the Danish Minister at Stockholin ; but when the Court of - Stockholm immediately, in consetpience of it, made:a com munication on the subject to the Court of Copen bagen,-it was.foood that the intentions of Den mark were by no means altered. At last a serious offer of peace was made by Denmark to this cumin 'try ; but at the time when Count Bernstorff's miss aion was matter of notot icty, at that-very time Den,. mark, in all the papers, was mentioned as the ally of France. Would it have been for the interest of England to have thrown aside the advantage of a power who had opposed the ants of France, for the sake of one that had supported their efforts, and that wished to reserve to itself the power of snaking peace with the successful party ? He .would takeupon himself to say, that the propo sals made by Denmark to this comiotry were such as no aunt of sense; would,.lmave beenauthOrisettist listening to. It would he animist if he shonld omit to ;my, that it was his _ belief that there never was its aity,power a more anxious desire to fulfil its en pigments,. than there was on the part of Swe deo. The delay i lauding the Swedish troops on the coltioent was owing to the length of time which had elapsed ere the news Of the ratification of the Treaty had reached Sweden; for during the ' whole.t:ine the Swedish troops had been in readi- oe6s to einhark.---‘l'ith respert to the conduct of th e swvdes, ►at the time of the capture of Haul . btyh, it was to be recollected, that the fate of that: to depended on the rnovilnentS of the grvat araii:is; and if the. Aiiies were obi g- eci to rctn.c.' upoti the 011 , 2 r, the . preservation 1-.l,:taihttrf. c h \lra:4 impaisthle. 11 , 0 c(}ndlit:t t-Ar tfie swykle:i that i4stance WAS 110 t to he , scHt),-,1 to any tyant of zeal,. t.ut Ivtli 1 . 1 e t :lit ;I coastirt!niate 'prudence , for whatever : I PP- - 1'1.41 , 4 , 3n may hereafier Enke place, Coe Siverj' , 4 3 eorfoi e.-al that time 'exactly in that sit,,atiot: w':n4,:l4 it cold& orwrate most c.ti;!cttlatly ngailiSt the F r e n ,As to the ce:,:iiott Ctiadatottpt,-- pus bess ion of a West Intlia Ishold Sts alwavit heel) , wit h any f ore i gn considered 'AS material in a treaty 1 „,,, vt , T; and there t 1,13 110 colony, (ht. tit gp ; i oo o f which was less exceptinable. than that which hall been given . to Sweden. On the subject of the Slave Trade, it had always,beett deemed higlily important to obtain the concurrence of other na tions in iLs abolition, and : this had accord hig ly been provided for by the mesent Treaty. By the Treaty theliade of Europe Was effectually opened to es, by making Swedent he entiepot for ly;tidt goods. He had begun w . th viewing the. stun* of Europe about the middle of the last year ; he would wish their Lordships to compare it with the state of affairs at -the-present time. They Ie seen for the last seven years the attempts whieh had been made by theltuler of France fo vxd!)ide thei r tain froe t the rights of civilized nations ; they had sere the effects of the maritime systein,-and bad got rid of it. His Lordship concluded a. very 'able speech, of which our restricted li mits have prevented us:from- giving even s per fect outliae,' by movieg an Address to his }top ! Highness th e niece Regent, which- was r ea d i n so very low a time by his ;Lordship, that we call not state anythingfurther of it, than that it was in approbation of the Treaty.' Lord flot.e.tku was sure there was in the Ilouse a feeling not only to express abhorrence, not of the Treaty only, but also of the principl es 00 which it was foende(l. Ile laboered under a disadvaotiwe in arguiag with the Noble Earl, be cause he found that they attached different !neat,- leg s to the same ,words. The Noble 'Earl had described the advantages of the Treaty in gener a l terms ; but he had forgot to .say any thing about the million of nomey which was to be paid to Siveden. . They bad agreed to cede Guadoloupe iii perpeteity.to Sweden—they agreed to assist Swe den •in despoiling-one of her neighbours with whom till lately Great Britain had been at peace ; they agreed to pay a million of motley ; and t h ey engaged not to make . peace the counnou enemy until . the stipulations of the Treaty we're fidßlled ; that is, moil Sweden dweld have taken Norway, al,i4 until we should have ceded Cuatia loupe. But what (lid Sweden - do, for all this—she agreed to send 30,000 men, to the Continent, an d to give us Stralsund and Cat - Ist:alit as entrepots for British goods ; Guatbdoupe they ceded in perpe tuity ; and they were to assist in the conquest of Norway, which was to-belong to Sweden in per petuity ; but Stralsund and Carlsiram were to be entrepots for British goods only, for fifteen years. When the Noble Earl had ,justified the Treaty by saying, that we were at wet with Denmark, on what principle did be justify the conduct of those 'Powers that were at peace with 'that kingdom ? 'The' Noble Lord concluded his speech by moving, as an amendment, that an bumble Addresa be presented tti his Royal Higheess the Prince .11e gent, in condemnation of the Treaty. Lord Hattaowev made an able speech in favour of the Ti caty, which 'our confined limits preclude us from giving at length. He remarked that the indemnification which bad been proposed to Denmark for Nora ay, was Swedish-Pomerania.— Sweden had also acted a most . important part, and performed a signal, service to the cause of Russia, by assisting in setding the differences between the Court of St. Petersburgh and the Porte. • Thu Marquis of BucKlNCutsai spoke against the Address'. Lord CLANCARTY spoke in tavotir of it. The 'Margins of . Douoeisa spoke against the Address. Earl GREY pointedly censured - the Treaty with Sweden, whieb aothorised the spoliation of the territories of a friendly• nerd unolfending Power, as a sine gnu. non, as an essential preliminary ; there WriS .110 coOcCti . sloll Ott .the part of. Defi ne:la whi,ll - could have avoided that spoliation. Whatever the origin a l cause o f -war with De nmark may have been, it was impossible to jus tify it, excaitt on the plea of necessity, and by the law of nations, whet) ;hat ceased to operate, am ple reparation should be limie for the injurks tlicted. The aene..,:atiou of Nor Way to Bwedest tvacilcl eventually prose highly injurious, as Res sot would naturally he connected with this Coun try, and ,Stveden with France,. With hiteNtible Friend be ',greed an opportunity had been lost by ministers, never to be recalled. A disposition towards peace might have been shewe with dig nity and •effect, shewing equally the moderation and justice of the country. • 'Moderation in suc cess wits an infinitely superior policy to solicittt;. Lion after failure. Lord BaTttuitaT observed, the Noble Earl had displayed, , nay exhausted, a great deal of ingenuity and eloquence ; but, in his mind, had advanced little of argdrncnt in applying to the real merits of the case. -With respect to. the ships which wvre detaieed by Stveden, itnd not liberated Mail tines were imposed, as mentioned by the-Noble Lord, the fact.wits, that at number of British ships were driven into Carlsham and other of the .Swe dish ports ; the countries were then at peace, but before the vessels could sail they became hostile, and the detention was the conseqaence. This country had acted so in similar circumstances.— He granted that if our acquieseence•in the Treaty was morally wrong, i, could not be truly politic ; but that it was the former, not one. word of the Noble Earl's :tended to prove. We were at war with Denmark at the time, and therefore, without moral reproach, we might have: attacked Norway ourselves, and kept po , setSioll of it, as well as we had done.in the rase of their Vest India posses sions, or the Lie of Heligoland ; and in that view an attack, if necessary or expedient, in concert with our Allies, was equally jas tifiable. In treaties of alliance; no one of the parties could fairly treat but in Con jenctiott with the rest—a consideration that operqted with others 'in the late oegnciations at Denmark. An acquiesoc. cc intheTreaty in ques tion was fotitided in political expediency as morality. it were withheld,-in what a sitea tion wduld' the country be placed. The Crown Prince mAit then have deinanded the thirty-five thonsand then front Russia, and with all the forces of Sweden iit addition, have attacked Norway.— That force was now; otherwise. employed ; and -,s'ithout its /diverting powers, the Allies might have been driven front the Oder to the Vistula! If raw had garrisoned the dominioes of Den mark, this country might have. heen ere now in a state of war with Russia and Sweden ; or have placed ourselves its a situation, in which, whether either Russia or France were victorious, the loss would be to this country; whereas, by acceding to th e Treaty, these complicated difft,:...alt;A were led ; and they would be . enaliied to.bring.a for-e Of 65,006 men to aet against Prance in the present caminkign. The whole thne the negocia tioo waq Carrying On, the i.'ct was known to. Prant,,e, who, not withstandin, l , continued to style mark its good and. faithful Ally, and to,keep, ins Minister resident at Copenhagen. This maybe considered with reference to the sincerity and ob jects of the Court'of Denmark in the transaction ; whose real design, however, in his opinion, seem ed to he to keep well at the same time with both France and England ; .but in all situations of that kind it nitipt naturally be expected - that a little falsehood might be told to at !east one of the par ties. Recurring to the conduct of Minh , ters in acceding to the Treaty in (ine , ,tion, the Noble Earl eonteritted it was justifiable in point ofjus- - flee and morality, NVarrillt ed by. calledfor by the -particular circumstances of the case After a few rernarlts front Lords GREY, LIVE, - Pont, and, fIoLLAND, the iflause• divided on the original question— Fin- the nitioo . of Lord Liv er p oo l, •Conleok , 78 Priixies • • , . G 2-140 Not Conte ,to Proxiri 27—G7 Majority iu favour of Mini,tevs— 73 AdjoUrned* TWO &Clock. HOUSE 'OF COMMONS. The Naval Pensions Bill, and Irish Malt Bill, Irish Militia Clothing Bill, - went through a COM mittee, the Report to he received on Monday. Un the. Order of the Day for a Committee of the whole House, on the Irish Distillation Bill being i•eail, Mr: W. Poe gave notice, that he in- . tended to tzi!:e the sense of t; e House upon this measure, on the bringing up of the Report. The 13;11 was then committed, and the Report ordered to he received on Monday. The Irish Tobacco Bill, Irish Road Bill, and the Irish Sessions house Bill, were read a third time and passed. G.ILWAY TOWN ELECTION. icE6K broaght up the Report of the Committee, appointed to inquire into the merits of ti.e Galway Town Election. It stated, that The Hon. Frederick Ponsonby was not duly elected ; that H. Blake, Esq. had been duly elected for the town and county of Gal way ; but that the Petition of Mr. Ponsonby Was not frivolous nor vax'ationi. Mr. Itosn moved the Order of the. Day for a Connnittee on the Victuallers Relief Bill, - - Mr. DAvrEs Grunt spoke against the Bill, and Mr. Rosa defended the Bill. After a few words' from Mr. CROKER and Mr. Wuritat.tn, the House divided—. For the Committee For the Amendment_ Mnjority The Bill.then went through aConunittee, the Report to be received on. Friday. The Spirit Duty Bill, the Funded Debt Bill, Local Token Bill, and Potash Bill were read a second time, and ordered to be committed on Monday. TREATY WITH SWEDEN. Mr. WlnTattEAn said, that as he observed in the second Article of the 'Pretty with Sweden, that the 'Vreaty.between Russia' and Sweden was concluded in March, 1812, he wished. to ask the Noble Lord opposite, when a communication was made to the Government of this country respect that Treaty Lord CAsmr,RP,Aon replied, that the communi cation was made in July, .1812. Mr. PoiNtsONnY rose. The most Convenient way for proceeding upon the .subject of the .Treaty, would be, be believed, by delivering his semi- Mews before the Speaker left the Chair, because In the Comniittee of Supply 014 could do notbing more than come to a vote upon the stipulations Of the Treaty. They could not in the Committee come to any resolutioa of presuming art AddreSs upon it. It Was his :wish that, such an Address should be.presented to his Royal IlighnesS, lug, that so . far as it was consistent wit!. 1 . !;.e good faith and honour of the Crown, he would . suspend .the stipulations that had been entered into with Sweden, until nitch time as be would en ter into engagements to withdraw himself from them. This, be believed, was the first instance of a Trea:y containing the cession of a valuable pbssession, being laid upon the Tm,ble without the the Minister being desired to take the sense of the House upon it. This Treaty was not Merely a Treaty of concert or siibsidy, but it a Treaty of 'cession—of the cession of. Guadaloupe, one of the most valuable. of the WeStindia Islunds. He did think, when .such was• the case, when a surrender of such importance was to be . made, that illinisters ought, at least, to have move d an Address upon it. I n the other House Ministers , could not pu rsue t h at course, but it was not the case there ; and as they forbore to 'pursue that course, be felt himself obliged to adopt rather an unusual mode of proceeding for taking the StOISC Of.the House upon the merits of the 'stipulations. The first and nmost remarl , othie thi ng -to w hi c h b e would call their attention, was the Ti eaty between Sweden and Russia, on the 311 of ?tlarch, The object of that, Trenty, as , professed by those power, was the reciprocal security of their respective States and possessions against time cotimmon enemy, meaning France ; for France was at. the time of the Treaty, the only enemy from which they could expect any danger. 111 the course of the last war, which . was terminated by the 'Treaty of Tilsit,' negoeiations were ear tied on between these Governments. Russia af terwards attacked Sweden; and obtained posses sion of Finland, the dominion of . which being an acquisition of much importance to her, she had long desired: that domieionaussia obtained by the connivance of... France herself. Russia t , fterwartit perceiving that a war with France was likely to, take place, sought by other means to preserve her dominion over the province which she had ob cludetainedd., t an hat d - the consequence wai, that she con Convention whiCh the p. r a was contained in men upon the table. By that Conven tion Norway was to be secured to Sweden, either by treaty or by force ; .and Rusqa, if force be came necessary to give Sweden the possession of it, undertook to Supply her with from 15,000 to 35,000 men, for the purpose of 'effecting, if ne- c e a es t ! t, ary, the subjuzation ofStorts.ol. L o l ,l C' th the British Minister; at the Control ::•''t• l'' -tersburgh, was . present When this fre;ay a•j! agreed to, and must thcreltae have been coa3ei. oily of the step proposed to be taken, for the P ur pose of procuring the junction of Norway to Sat , den. Russia undertook not to procure for So' deo an exemption froth the attacks of Norwu_r r i Denmark,. bet to proettre for her the Pe r P' l3g , cession of Norwav itself. The Tr e aty %s` ll say, that troth p a rties would ; so far as it u'ni't their potver, avoid 'making an enemy of tae 11 of Denmark, with whom liejther Intl men ' quarrel, and that they would ;roeare on in:lco e , ty by .territories more convenient to the tico.: l possessiotts of Itia•Danish Majesty. lici e v '', t the deliverers of Europe, the men wl") ,iced to , tree - the- world from the oppresiive cent''' a Vrance, agreeing by Treaty to nlke ''.,) from an utrotlentling rower a p 7 .irt of l' c . (14 :,'' ' ,; Ikons, and promising compt nsation by th e 1 ;;;:e of possessions made •contiaalotts to the t ( ri , 1 dottlinions of that tinollending l'ower. It ` . l ,_ in this manner that Germany was 4 ? be i t ' :', liVered tip. It was thus that the Emperor of L.'',' silt, who signed hirus - elf iti his l'roclainat,o , Alexander, the deliverer of Germany, it . 0 35 , !' r ; he_was preparing to dispose of the Germos v , '' ,4 , became to deliver. The policy of this stcl ) " . , equal to the justice of it ; and how "L'Y Cjb % . 174 in this country, how any M.inis:er of a !Linn, ',I had, from the opening of his reign, be e ' l la f r or a for justice, and for every virtue. that, could ' d ' i:or royalty, who had been for many vcars strl ti s g`' : to in war, commenced with na Other view t ' li dv prevent such a spoliation as this treaty saur l ,: :, ., el ; how the 'Ministers of such a ; ing 0 ) 111 ' 11 :ii the hardihood to propose that the couutrs'sh'll.o become a party to such an agreerneut, ‘va r° ,o a a matter of surprize_ and regret. if I. l lle ti ), of Lord opposite (Castlereagh), was all "'''' ' ) . " the establishing the authority s of France , this ',", 5 a. .... most effectual wens he coahl, pci3s . iiq ` l `; ° '; v iti a F n r;tn r e eg e al t . v d a t s o atchetei rights d, and justly a eet°cr ' s i aerd treading down the rights' of nations , h" l ' w ,` ls ,,„ar 1 They indeed w e re a g e: l :ci t e s of to i s l a a y ticl it i i is tl i :e i tr r ili r se ' \ ' ' ' ,; l)L i . f „ i !, c li Y i had entered into, that the traosier of il- t a.. 0 to t h e s!totilti be made with all possible ree;"?,1! ..... 4 i liberties of the people of 'that countrY., o za ties ntocksry,' it was an insult to flak of ti le l a w ~ta of a people under sorb eircteastauces. . 11 a a pulations of the T raa ty were conce ived i It :: same spirit, and would be executed hY t" t .„ 1 ., nteatis as the partition of Poland. l):, 148 1 4 ~i titian, which opened the rune! to e'lm's'sigtft...:;4 injustice, the established , and halanciug .._ot Ett rope were subverted. l'he liiw of the 41° ; 00 , was substituted ,in their rootn. Tii , Trentt(, tlit under their consideration' spoke t'ohohe s . 0 ~f Poles ; and When i t was r e a d by the Allots t. 4 li the i'lni)ic any Power in Europe, 'how e( ' l ' r; : 10 Lord (Castlereagh), talk ,to hitO of the it, 4 o , o of nations ? IViott no‘e, he veci uld 1 s ti p, the object a this Treaty of occeSsiOn int.Olivitice 'fix Prl'P''' r e ,`, l on ce 01 this couotry had' entere,d. ttihfeitttitis independence a elt:s of fticert tilt the ril l ilh:.- 'collo its'tfcei r er ° l: l e t 4 n: i p ' nion l from one o f' d i e Northern 1 0 ,.. ,ei , woald lit' faiiir. what, if Val' before existed, . cool' , . po ‘ The Treat,/ ; ttlopie):ceeLisbolithhaef(llbieyi:ii.,,fileillepsetNet;rtr:.eri tillitgt)!Ca,ti)r:ad.l.l.l;.e,l,:tiii:(tol:it(ihi,o:ttinri prudtice no - b ene fit to Great . 13rit , t,"!; 44441 a, waa in its f o r t f union with. J AI . r eqs of titer stu e 0 to )r isitr - as advantageously situated tor . p oa aal , this country as she could pos sibly he . „a 'lle lens ati • ti.1:11:ledesotl.1111iS Was . f,Nlitori::::' hgwever, %%as, it seems, to be cowl t ., t , t h e tiq,'?, tootle a MutiOn Some few clays bat J i tbis sal ) " elation* that had been:,carried on or' could iect i n t o h i I % ) v e i n t l ' i ll s .a a i' t k "ei y to il e the lTa s p t i i b"ll.(ji c r l e ' c r t 'i l i t c e l ; 3lt) :i t4l :ll .)r a • closed, From whence could the d3 n , rl ,: t ; g-r .:l th3t I' l.' l l7i: t i t e r ; tv r a e : ‘ t i t l i t t ? cti ta l t l i r i iatsed it i t t l7l . I . b i e c s ' e s : :cr g '.:esi'l l i' e ) ' l .l::: from the relation in which Fiance i. Denmark, it could not be suPP nse( "l 1 e I ' 6* p,_: lrt %%tt)l‘l,l,lt)%luft:iic*ia'acsii:trit);sitilli'lsse.tllislininirsliootwlsttooltitillnlt'°ltolscliseltritftl,':,isNitiiN.t‘ici°tti.:llo}ltiifi;:s'rci:le.igi.litltliecitlrsti.ll(..ktiisii%:).s.eeti:l4.or(itlicl.is,elyit°:).lesii:•%:',.):;c3l(s.l,:,ti,ll:c'. ' I lie— In the second, r ee of in u. p tLi ns l a tol . to _ it a, e .pll she that all Optip !l was ~;‘,.,„ to -Denmark wit ' t ,... 4 , ~ ay wust go E 0 .atvet ~. , r --." • Delllllol* was leasedn', . to it " P "' le From , ,„, e lt). agtta. :;It - .; a Pa.agrapit iii the Treaty a person. - .t i x ,l led to a lt. sus l )ect, that if 1.)11 alien It joined tlicN`)l,.4 lance she may ret a i n N ora -ay, but thert. ":`,,',' of such „ thing. Even: in the erelit ttiat the I %';' ?- :,,ty between joined in that allia(le, still, LLlCiii:l23 to ' Rtissia and 'Sweden would cOlnP e `, " Ih r bil part with the subjects who had been lona t0a.1,-': it, tint. Ile and were oven Persotially att 3 '.';',,lo. hitn. Ile would defy the Noble Lord (.‘'' 1 , 4 4 . reJigh) to contradict this statualent. N°t lii , l ;t l i ,;i , i than t_lie cession of Notway cool(' satislY i;.,. or .and Sweden, and the only alternative fe'`,...... the Danes was to opposa force •Ir; ,- l' irc ;:ta Ile knew not. what could unlace this et'"° l. :,Jc.-, aagpraeretytotoSu it; a treaty of partitioii. No c°l- ia" ration of profit should have coducedher to he e ` v , but even if profit could he I' ll t aar - cuse, what profit was to arise from it ? Ikt ; it once, anti co-operation of Swede!). Bet tilcill, must also give ocatision to the hostility d ~1 , ,,;, mark. One power was nearly eqa.d to the (); o r e so abet, there would be nothitta - vsined fr" Tl a .e friendship of one that would not - be 10't L P " `..1 1,. d" enmity of another. It wodld, perliaPs , '; ~,ta that being at war with ,Dertmark, it wa , ' .1 1i 'irt i e adopt against her every .mode of an noyance- . * cr i only legitimate •enti of a"r r ifti N'o6s, by ail xri t , • 1) uprat the subject, • .allo . ived W to be p ea ce, a o ve s vernment at the presant day would, he he" e 4ll „,r admit that it wuged war for the purpose Jo : extinction. Every Government when connu, ll oo ,.. It war, at least pretended• present causes oi . C fax plaint, or apprehensions .of - future danger ; stiCKl which it-roust provide. In d o steaf almtl: 11 7 ' d i t r ie Treaty as this, ti wise staterhan would " 3 " „pa to unite all - the PoiVers of the N or th in 9.1 0il .11;t. , interest. The only justification of the Tr ea )1 ' l . ' rieti war with Deanaar.k, but as that war VV. I " X 7°l C4'. 1 I