The Sun. — London, England, 1807-11-05 00:00:00

:•.(-4A4,4 .1.,-11P: REPORT. couter. I , C N C FRY * Nov-4, f FV;°.' : ; . :'‘l( FE' ARE° Ct' :\ ITTH, IHE MA TEM On u 4. This was tire re-hearing of au order issn4)(.l by Lord Chan Cell& tlireaing• the Petitioner: to pay the coStshicident to tlitsAupersetled'connms sion, and furthCV the costs of a prosecution fur "a conshiracy, 211essrs. Btowtiis and Mutt said, that Mr. A.Y•. • rowstnith, the Attorney to that cointnission, had, 'been ren,leted liable to these costs, under the/order,' from anotion which was entertained by the late ellancelfor, that be had been guilty Of groSi and' criminal 'negligence. Among the charges on which the accusations were grounded was one, that he did not exeiiiite . his chit)! as Solicitor to the Ctimniksici, bs making protwr inquiries into the Petitidning Cre dttoCs debt. 'floe Learned ContiSeltad 'never un-' • &rimed that it, was the duty Of the Solicitor to as 7 certain 'such debt , by legal evidence, - k% it h alt tleat precision and accuracy' which was required Of the CoAmnissioners 'or of the .Cutirts before which e question :of this nature' would be decided.: Iti,"Wits, true that there Was a conspiracy to defraud 'one'Of the creditors under this cetmnission ; but . the - pre ,. sent Peritionerhad no knowledge of.sucle cdminal: conduPi lunch less was he to be puoished'as• it he. were 'a party to that conspiracy. Tile exaininatieu of Watts before the MagiStrates'was the foundation of the'preseeution, and 'of the stibsequent . Ment and convittion. Sir SA'OEL RONSILLY resisted the prayer of, this Petition, as Counsel for Mr. Jett.“ He observed that his'client was a bona fide creditor of the bankrupt, and in that character had obtained judgment and taken out exeautien. After • this proceeding, there was a contrivance between BUrbridge end Walsh to . get rid of the execution. Ile had successfully as serted his rightS, alter having been Mon grossly in— inrod; mid if his Lordship were to reverse the older, his client would have done more ~ , viaely to have , submitted to the injury ; and all hottest creditors, in future, would do well not to expose themselves 16 ruin, Cry endeavouring to oppose trauJulent bauk , mpleies. catty not alledged that Arrowsmith was a party to the conspiracy, but it was sat icirttt to Kt/VC, that he had - idled With gross negligence, and that in consequence of not having properly discharged his duty, as an officer of the. Court,. he had become the instrument of fraud upon' an. honest. creititer. In such eases, in a- legal and. equitable sense, negligence was a crime. What were the,uncootroverted 'faEts ? A commission was taken' out fraudulently, by a man of a character so notoriously bad, t hat,•he. had been rendered infa mous by being exposed in the pillory, in the county. , where Arrowsinith . pradised.' It turned , •out, that in truth there 'was no petitioning'eredner's debt kand! are only aet of bankruptcy committed, was - ovate& at the time the commission was applied for; bye con trivance in Walsh's house. • Then Arrowsinith Atli& • that the security to Jett was an at of Bankruptcy. , What was it ? It was a warrant of attorney, to con- . fess judgment by a lona lids' creditor. What was 14 excuse ? That lie made no inqUiry himaelf,.buttrust-', ed to the iMormation of Watts and Walsh ; yet in his own bill of costs•it appeared that he was aaive in - pursuing theusual examinations ; and it must be acC knowledged, most uetive be - was' in seine part of the. transattions, tor- . he even advanced the intioey to the pillory-man to strike the 410tket. By andther part of the bill.of Costs, it was evident 51r. Arrowsniith • was most reprehensible. It lays,. To my bill of leies for proem Mg Borbidge's certifictue,.by your press 'order, so .had been previously' agreed' between us, 121. 125." Was it thus the Court would, perniit hanlaupteies to be cotsdittied,• t ha rhy contrivatieesbe t ween the parties, certificates s hould' be. obtained ? .bait this wlts . not all., There was an ,ortler of the Chun, that no commission should issue which was not spittle; tioried , by the name,s Of two :Barristers.. With this order Mr. Arrowsmith had not: complied ; but.„the business was so managed as to elude the Clerks at the Bankrupt Odice ; and to this partings , tbe addi tion of Esquire, instead of Gentleman, was sub joined to the name of one of the' Solicitors, I%lr. i'vlatlJtatn. The orders of the Court were copied into the books of pratlice, And even circulated by every proper expedient, so ill3t it was impossible that m r . Arrowsmith, who was an attorney in extensive praettee could be ignorant of the order to which the reference had been made, This, then; was an 'es ample of 'the grossest abuse of the process - of the Great Seal, of which the petitioner tklll !be instal ment under the proceedings ; and it would be most mjschievuus 'if sueh , tilen were pem'udtted to escape •with impunity,. ~~~~!~ i The Liar ? CitA'sc.l4.Loit said, that, the import was this ! Burbidge hod his certificate procured neon the undertaking of Watts, the petitioning creditor, pie yiously concerted. Then the commiSsion was taken out qnder circumstances suspicious both as to the petitioning creditor's debt and the aft of baa.ropt,:y. In the sequel tbe certiticitte Was'obtained by the so licitation of Artowstintli, and paid fOr to the,extent of it) guineas out of 1 4 2, under the ogreenTlit• in Ininary, tttoj,, 'six weeks- alter the commission, 'rite difficulty seemed to he, to make, Arrowsmit h liable to pay the costs,. f o r the criminal prosecution but he ought to ltnow, that he put himself in the power of then Court, to dti all it could do in sO,ll a vA4., in the fur and proper exereise of its Sr' SAUTJET. ittiMtp,Y %aid? 11iat,,15 Po the msts, the Court, itt &mean% Got they shoula b e pa ktoy Arrowirnith, sectutd to thint; tigit, under the cirr cknotancets, they •• vvere in ia!:!.t incident to the pro. ceediugt b:lttio.uptcy, tuid thus constituting n part of them, they might, .to,he discharge 4 by the peti tioner. • • • Mr. Ricall.llllB, ill reply to Sir SAMUEL BOMII.'• entered into 4erai) of the, vgiotth lad*.conned ed %Vial the,ie trailiaaion's ; from I,vioich h e LOU_ tludetl,' that although the Petitioner was ,cliargeable with negligence, yet that ite h,een guilty of uo ,plich heinous otfence its to sttlie4 hituielt to, the dimplea*ure of tOe C'ofait, -on which halt an or4er plohe cutild be. Icallikdi mid that, ;my event, the ctionit'aP Ax w it protution matter, perteOly tint, w i t i ch he could pot,be liable, s under - the ordinary principle* of equitable= (~aol6st...Loit said ) that when this matter came before. hiru e the :thought • it, right , . that tilry Atrowsmith should. haee eeportunity of he- Mg heard.; lie had now made a lime atfidavit, to meet the übjeetioea stetted to hie coedua. ; and it , did not furnish a sufficient answer to thetn; it would. net heitniveudid to say,,:.l4oll!lhOrivool4btfinsuver blet. !Jett: bed.takee out eeirtlatiavalgaitiSt Burbiage• He had levied neon his • etretakineaning to devote the, produce exclusively to the, paymeet, of his own debt., It occurred to others that this object might be defeated by a commission, the eonimission over reaching the etfeet of thetxecetioti.. It is without all doubt that such a purpose might be legally' and , honestly entertained and'aded upon, other creditors haVing a right to avail themaelvea of the rernedy,by, defeating they execution for A . Jeg;tl and legitimate purpose. But if This were founded; only on - Aaiun anti fraud, it was imp6ssible to , say that a Solicitere who was a Miuister of the Coort, did not thrget his duty if he lent hiMself to fulfil such a frendulent; in-, tention..; Yet them was n differenesebet)%een lend. ing himself and mere, negligence. ,This exele.itie ep, peered to have Wee levied upon Monday, the alb of Nov. 178 e, when Mr. Arro*smith had. left his resi dence to go to Leicester, from whence he returned our the 17th. When he was come back, he wais: applied to by Walsh, who was , known to him only under the name of 'Williamson. It then appeared; that he lent him four gOineas ; and this might be material to enable Walsh to take out the:commission. Then as to the aa't of bankruptcy, it tittle:next that. Burbidge was denied to several creditors at the house of Walsh, to constitute that ad. Did it never, occur to the 'Petitioner that Walsh's house was a very ex traordinary place for Burbidge to reside in under such circumstances ? Whether, he had abscondedi: and was 810 denied in the manner stated, was entire-. ly unexplained. The depositions of Watts, his Lortl, ship presumed, were prepared by the Solicitor under the commission, .or they .ought at least .to devolve under his immediate observation. Thence arose an-. other suspicious circumstance : it was known that 1001. was the exad sum by which a commission seas, ft) be supportede if by onirone.petitioning creditor, . 'lle words .of the deposition were, " one hundred pounds and • upwards." Here. Ahoy had struck out. the words " and upwards,': acid that deposition con.' tamed no intimation of the existence of a promissory note, When the bankrupt wait, examined, he said, that he was indebted to fife: petitioning creditor, tin money lent, in th© sum of 1021. 105. Oting for the principal sum and interest up to that. tittle: Then: came the athd.tvit, varying the eirenuistanees, slate ing that he was indebted eweLlos.,and to account for the 21. t Os. there was introduced the explanaiiter ) that he had a security or setisfaaiore which was fnund to be dated 'in 4prile se..4a. le make 21. 105: interest upon the very day when the act of bankruptcy weetcominitted. There %yeti ,somewhat of me e e r ee . tnre in all , this. It was.a difficolteask, itt sume.cases; to execute the duty the Court required. .Althouglf it. wOuld• repress tc4tltlulent commissions,: yet the Court must not impose upon the Solicitor so far as tot. makelit dangerous for him to. _ make out a cone , mission. Btit the question was here, as in all cir-, cutpstances of the kind, " Can you represent this as a case of mere surprise .1" It did astonish his Lord- ship, that Solieiners of great name and high Characie ter wetild engageellemselves in duties so difficult to execute, as the three charadera ;involved, of Solici tor to the creditors, nethe assignees, and to the back.. rupt ;::Such. a three-fold relation was not easily aceemmodated to the interest Of each and all, parties, ,which they ought attentively to promote. • Another Circumstancedeserved particular observe. tion, If a party engage to pay for the certificate of the hankrupt e and such eertili(mto was obtained in the short inter Val of six weeks, no man conid say but that there must: be coosiderahle doubt of the fairness of. the, crocettliog. His. Lord approved of this ore degas far atvii-respeeted the paymetteolcosts Mt:Went to the proceedings oe , the beekroptcy. ' Taking it as negligence, it was negligence so mischievous that, tuts person ,gtaill yof it ought lobe responsible. As Lathe other pat, he; hadittlitticult) in acceding to the order.; The &editor indicted thenarties,mnfor taking out the commission of b‘mkrupt,but for wicked ly conspiring to defraud him oldie, reined)tthelawgaveltim,by apply ingagainst .him'a..proceedieg All9law, never intended, should be se employed: , two petty to the indiatuent, :and he couvielel them t Writ seemed to be strange ; in .this Court; , t,tt Wake enieey, to, say that it was a proceeding "in the courses of its.justice thus to affea an individual not to party to such indiament, As:to that part of ;the order, he should think it must be varied, and that, the:Pee thionef stiottld the sofer relieved upon the payment of exists. Although 'it , was not in his Lordship'sNiew, illegitimitteproceeding' for t he.Coert to charge penal . costs.-under 6LICh ciretatustetteo in ,bankraptcy,„yet lie begged it to.bedistinpiy understood that lee in timated no. Opinioe as to. what ;wield ht: the if to comprize sech au °Weed, another form undue; Ceedine were. instituted ,in this Court or elsesshere. , Mr.iticiteuvis requested to know it his Lordship intended that the costs of this. application should be paid.by.the Petitioner ,• . . . ThieLottreCmiteceteort replied, that. he thought they ought trt beeOpaid,;; Thoother petty Lid been put to all the eXpence 19 which they Would have .betm exposea,lied they Proceeded in another way. Of about . , sixty Petitions,. the Court had advanced in the prugress of its nusines3 to tl4e sixteenth. The (sit was 114 e, case 91• Er 7 parte Hurt, in the matter of Portritige, which involved.several quebtions of con viderable. importance in.. mope& to the ,pey;ers of abSiglict;s. , , SAutitt. and Mr. Itnt.J. were heard on the, part of the Petitioner 4, Nlr. HAAT, on the controxy hitte,; wAs.thoirgd to proceed tu-morrow (this) morning. ocrougn at. •,, t,Eitlil V. .51T . OUGHTON.--..STOI , IGIVITIN V. LEIGH. This . case entne on under wceeptions to : the.ll,4g ter's Report. The matter has teen before •the Court -for tunny years,' and involves ;,it question which hits heenlitated . by the present I,auD,CHAsice,t.Lon to . be of the- highest interest to real property. In, the course oflecording the particulars of the .proce7e4ings iii this cal ;se, it lias been- said: to arise.on esta4l. in the, Principality of Wales, in some of its most t 1191111•. Pinotis distrias, Ajr. J 910) Haithury ,died, seised this propery, in the year 173.1. IN principal LONDON .. o r .'r,;iircc, by iNI i c,HAR'D Moroi:tit, Of No. 4 , Martlett-cpurt, tiow-ttteel; At SVN-OuPtGit i 12, Strand . ; whorl.' Alto tuentents, Orders Valve comisted in miwes' of iron anal ceat ;.a , fT4 ihe method' of obtAiahlg these, at that period, was, VFolleain apro(!igit,us quantity of water in thq and giving if a raging - current into the vallio, by which all the light. luaterials of the soil were.removed, and the minerals were laid bare a the surfliee. Since:that period, the estates devolVed.,,, into the hands of his Widow, whu was , entitled to third of them for her doWry,-and who subsequently married 'Mr. S . .rouglitou. For upward.; of 20 years they have,eontinued under her tnanagemcnt, 'and that of her second husband; and during this inter 7 val they have learnt •wisdotn' from their Eastern neighbours, and have - introduced shads, 'levels, Ste,am-engines, and all the other modern iminove -,•e• ittas ; by which' these minerals have :become a proditrinus source of opulence. The question befOre the Court Was, whether mines could be subjed dowry ? Tenant in dower is, .where the husband of a woman is seised of an • estate 'of' inheritance, and dies: in this ease, the Wife shall- have the third part of all the lands 'and tenements whereof he was seised 'at any time during the'coverture; to hold for herself tbr the term of her natural life (Litt. s. It the Mines were,6ohje6t to dowry, Mrs. StouglMrn, would be entitled to one-third of the produce of' the rnines ; if otherwise, the whole 'would go to the' heir at law. The Master had- repoited that Alm was' so entitled, and to this Report the' exceptions taken. Sir SAMVP.I. Itomtay and Mr. LEWIS spoke in support of the exceptions. They said, that a diny, by her dower, wets not entitled to,the produce of • mines. She was entitled to one-thirckoNhe produce of the estates; but mines were not the pro duce, as,grain and herbage, bUt were the ;t&ual toil of the estate. On the same principle, she could not have the timber, and, perhaps, not the underwomL Supposin g immense works had been raised tbr the m anufaCtnre of bricks from the 'soil; she could not• be •entitled to the produce; on precisely the same principle. The widow could be entitled to.nothing, if she Were, under any circumstance, to have one ,third of the Mines, tdeo.s: the intnes were worW, during•the life-tithe of hcr husband. •Tbesermines were not worked ;' by an experiment of :Welch.lin petuosity, the, bowels of, the earth were-exposed to. the ligln of. 4eavtii ; 'but this violent method of hy . dtostatic discovery could . not be continued consist ently with any notion af.working the mines.- • These observations. applied to the t wo . ..first excep-: tions ; the third was a mere question of fact, whether any new veins were opened : for the resolution of which the Learned connset referred his I,ordship.to the Affidavits on which the determinatimMost de pencL: Mr 4 RicaAtius and Mr. Aortal,- for the .widow, °U tended, that she % . Vflti entitled to one-thir& ot the, produce of the mines, and that the Report of the Master was correa l'hey assimilated - the case of dower to that of tenant for life, who was alWars , entpowered to work: the -mines which had: been' opened upon the estate prier to its devoh4ag into. his possession ; and to which he was as clearry,rn 'titled as 'the , grass or grain that vegetated upon the: soil.• :No (Witt could possibly arise, If :tenant in dower were in the* same situation as tenant for as to those.whieh had been opened in the time of the 'husband ; the only question would be, :as - tis. those which had been opened since ; and -if thoser new ones were continuity of the same veins,as the fbrmer ones, the widow ,Aottld be entitled irvright of herdower. Witethr they were, in Ntl,• a pro longation of the veins, must be de:Wed the Atli davits. ,The Loan QuArJett.Lott saki, that. the subjeia'of mines, and the rip:W.4" on which the produce was conveyed, , had oecaSioned mach difference of dpi= Mon 'between great . Lawyers. Lord ,Thutlow and Lord Kenyon dispute& warmly these questions ; hitter said, that in countries where they carried burdens from the mines • upon little-Welch:hews, and:thti mode of conveyance , wits alterett.to cants;' it wan; hicumbent on the country to;inalioahe breachefi evroads wiclelinough . for the latteni—lie (the Chan:4 ceilor) heard : Lord Iflturlow reply to this.do&rine Lortf,Kenkott . .,. t if -the question( Were to comeon the House -.of l'eerg, he would die before he would submit .to ; A-great part :of- the property in coal, his Lordship remarked, belonged to families, who; centiVies:• . ag' cr,lreserved blicause they could not 'sell it, and to4hotu new it was an immense source of wealth • • • ,„ :•' , biir Samaitt. AomiLLY; in reply, said) that in the absence Of :ill authority, he could not isiilievelibat . his Lordship would determine), that mines were siibjeet' tb "dower. 'ln this peculiar case, 4lietabietice of authority was din fait 'the highest :authorit.S.'j it .fcia showed that. it. had .never been• claitOed.it" tne . were many herediternents besides mines whickiVere not the subjet:t 601%doWers. A Lcommon stint, mid a castle fttirthe dine a the reaped,"' *tre excluded., Lord Coke had 'enunieratedall Afte_art“ ales to Which:dower:extended,. and omittet iMin pSntniy esi, because they werei'not' liabletedoWeLvlit witg,true, that Lord Chief Baron-Comyns had-said, that mines bV ctistom miglakz be isubjua to: dower. The ease referred to iii support of this doEtrinelWas in n-bookiirely;elted; Mr.,Justieeauntague theme ;inquired, Shalt . a . ;womtin be endowed of-Mines of tin .?" Yes,":rreplied' Harris, the Counsel, " :if it be olthe custon.k Ihe astonisionent expressed by the learned Judge on the occasion:of such an.anus= 'seam' propokition, was a .strong argument iii :favour of his (Sir Sainue) •Romilly'h) side_oLthe que4tiOti, mint a nb custom- was here pretended. it was ado mitted‘,Ahat the widoW would .not be entitled) to Rey mines; . - or oink, but such as' were Worked;:thiring . , the lifetime ,Of her husband. - tin'this Part of, thq caw, tin ininertnntquestiOu Whether pOuring down at vast' inundation, competent root up and bear off the element of nature,'• were Au be coniider• ea working the mines ? Suptiosing the husband, for the convenience of his ftimily,, had a .stitilva: well -to the depth of .I . oo ,, ieet:;- and, in -the. ceurse elfthis operation, had cut through twenty ,or .fifty strata of ralua4Jetninerals, could this! be,denominated work ing the tune. , so as to give tenant in duffer, 4.1 ,tenant tor “e, any prirkteges or advantilies with regard to subterraueuus property. On tne r hole, lit conaledvit, that mines w,,ece notthat soy ;If pro perty to whieh Mrs:. Stoughton in dowry. could in q 4 waylo t;s 9uldhesue(natitash 1 1wi,. 4 1 4 110 tniue.~ Ii id not been worked a claim ; and that under ,any and every cousiruc;tion • . which his learned' opponents should apply y , hit cool • . • -f r~." , i~ti)UblitillCti by . WILLIA aFt SCR l 'l osollh, Mot SA-Orett, cirwirata,wwm; for the s hipui, Tft teif fot' the Editor ) tkc. olsoetii4; riikast be addressed.' not guccessruily 4tipph . t Ler claim; to the new veins that had been disco:ereci siuce the decease or bet . .... •• ..... -, ' hus*aist -.. . - ~ . . . y e , hi i'l ole - C.ll AN CELLOR said he should atten!ig7 v Y, liatw. Ike iiiii.tiviti, is the du trine was tit - grCjic ..ittpuitzwitid he iihould deliver juilgrnent T.l Oil, :Alyoie*.unight. . His Lordship inquired if the' k"F:r+ C9phisel 1114 ,fctopsi that ; mines were Apsiii(49s l 4it any - ofht.v.\Vrlits . of Dower in the ISogl . ci of *gift, Aod:wis,linswe t recl.py N . lr. iticHAuosiu du; tiegi EX-PARTR MACKIE; • Sirs. Rosti'LLY'said, this wa4 the PetitiOn of.'s Bankrupt / voider very peculiar. eircutnitalleet. M t Nl‘Michael; and . Messrs. Crowder laid -Lavie werti the only creditors who had koved then - debts:on the estate. !Mr. M'Alichaelbad been nominated assignee , and when he had paid himself and the oases ants, 20s. in the pound, a considerable balance .‘titild remain •in his hands. He had cbvenanted to pay the' • ntotieY into, the hands:or:Messrs.' Hoare and Co: 10 41/ had not complied with that engagement, 7 • The Loan tHAN . CELLOII-=" . Niiliat:is the sum ?.,". Sir 5. RomiLLY--" The sum is 741. Mr. APMi. chaaadmitted before the Commis.ioners that be ha'i . received . that surn,,:which.fie had *td into his bank qrs, Messrs. , Butler and Co. Lombard-street. He boa • • proniked to transfer it to Messrs. Hoare and Lo. 90 the 15th• Oaober, but had not done so." Th&Loan CHANCELLOR said, that, the Ord".' • should be, that hethould par 1t into the handsofthe: because, if the cOmtrlis" l ". were' superseded, there-might be a diffi cu lty iti . ex - traaing it from the bankers. • Sir 'S. -iloratLi.Y 'obstened, that Mr.-M‘Michnel 1).••• debt toot. and hqmight;perflaps, stop - that in'its passage. • Thirtoitb CRANCELLoR replied,- that .he sheto order him to pay the whole ; he should-not-be : re' mittod first, to discharge his own debt. lihOttld be paid to- three d4e after serving null c ; and 05 t° luntil that • .est, it might stand over ay be . llo the applicatiou,extended further. • tn Traivis, who Wa 3 mined otrSacurday tast,•oh Suspicion (if haVing ripb,l?. Air.-Beck.et ot'a quantity of 13.mk 'England RfijillS(/ :;litilreiv Armenia and his . pp su os,i .!, be accomplices, were again briiught up ye,;terdaylbs:7 fore P. BROADLEY; ESC) : tile Sitting M:l ; isteah,:!,.. • when, 111 tonkvence of the noii-a`ttetidahce of p'erson through whose hands part of the. notei,l l 01. , , • been traced; they orticnil bail; fo/yrisi?, are to be' brought up again on 'Eues,tiy 11!:•t• gall whs . alsa brought 'iv fileite'"l'";; frau , . the shop of :qr. I.‘'ar,l,iii iil.tc.i r u.lntit(of articles, and is &Yalu rein Pri,on 1: - .11 San rifay. .•i„ , A Eire French Prisongro, w h o t ri tely brae 146( p,.14 . role at Launceston, and took,' e ti.ilittg-twat . froP in. which they. put Cu hint, were drive' . : hy .: f9el.weittlf•i - , have ,PeeA committed to.thet.•,z, county prison at .• • 011 Q of 'the female cliihlren of the Foundling. Hospital. on. Sunday, t'eli dow ti .1:0# 4111 , 4.01 Awl was fortunately nut klk•kt,,por ,hari,sbe a, wild foroken,.but was severely broi4etl. Ye!terday morning .early ,ttig.liottse.of..Mr..D tat4 Linqn-ArN).er'ill Cl.ll(#olvell;Green, was brolnli OPVI' 83,1 rs l 4oeit. at ail, 11 1 0. family luiwi, , and rues of the wearing apparel. Nowt:Lot* thu goods in al. warehousc were clg w.y touclio.;_ o.t . A , You% .1114n.',in a fit ,sponde, himself frptp,;bo Nies of the Tv wer et' Laum,eitto • Ca-itle, one ilay atlclAtirviyed but, a . tim e r • lietote the: present, petiott there never was, 6 11 4,. Dever' rbe again, 'Most "probably, such an.iffir mense •Ptele 'as 40,0001. in any tottetylScherrie r only. 20,000 Numbers.- Can this oily oilpiiitnairi r , then, ?f.poisessing Chances for obtaining . so -nieiirksn'q a Capital be suffered to escape by even. the 'Adventurer 3 To-morrow , a neronines- this great event. •• , "-• '''- '' ' stifii'Elvs, ' .. . . j . oicti4., Nov,iitesst+.2., ',. Arrive,---theM line id Ka4gtta TrapsPOrlst.pnd TOAtigr pitr;' , ftuin'Col! l :lo l . l Ken 4* and Selk)'; 7--. I(ain Yaritlift !I . Git,Al43END,.No,Vtaitta 3, 1'A55.,..4 by — the Novo . Wiitneril fiat 1 C9peilli t igcti. ' __ A r 152044-4110 Elizabeth; Ikupilgnson, and Britihts ' iltic°"' tkart9uw fur 11111141(a. • • . 4 ~• 41/ , ‘ 7 //. On the rsti'nstr. itad Lady of Lieutenant-Colone t ;; Gc ;t l4 ii oftlw ith Dragoon Guaidi, of iSon4 MAR'm iJ pN Yesigrtiay, at St. P ~ attcra cHurch ,. 11)}1 acv. C. Katy of tie,roard-sttcet Russell souaite lvir • wilanuot; b l i c) t ) ,rtdussd , ay: tad.. • TaY es, to MattrikiV)ite4 Of On*O.Y WT. ''— On Sunday last, at Litchfiefil,' TI-lahr . fi tirrowes, 0f dui.e, County of Catan, litlitut, to tllias iewara, at o' 4 • .. • • .peev, Ott Tuesiliy, at l'lumsteati eiitirt)h . in Kent, • 'lO Cliatle3 r311144.0r5t. I.aurcAtce, Clui,Urburr, E ihatieth eltitivC‘, 7 4cood4auelttatiAtt ate lato"tiltattl3l4ri . Colotwl PiOktPit=4 , e , I , J • '" " • Ott Thurstl.l the wit ttli. thrist's 4 7 1,1 1 frcilt, ' Pools R. lexarttler, P.sq. of the Island of 14 4 '1140i:6r Kach:1111:-:, youngest tlitogntet of the inte-klol , wel 1 4 - 4 "'" at tlut S : t, 4 noor!4 49, ,t lie !ilitipti Dit . Sunday. the tStli ult. at Rev. Came, "Ctiiate CieditO(P l io 'iNl di •ItL t.44b4.t It " ''' thit&daughter I. 4,1114. r: . Lately, F lett - stiret, 1; 11 -4, 4 1 0 1 1 ., ;or Dundalk, ,to Iffiekids, elcleot ilAngtiteA kffis, 54. of Stra torti,l tin 't t Ctiulfer Art, ate' 11.111 Monday last, art ltetßittislt C.hilit.lb dt B.aohunt , els,lames 44tiqp, 1 itt 411 1 446 f pq,, this couple a:munt tti outriba,to t e ° , O-• „ • . _ ~ , . .: : ; .' ' - • 7.7.771-I.', rir *7' (7 ' :4 9h i Tuesday, the Rev. losph _Williatniiin, ROO' ~ thakeham, Sussex; mid 7,lorlitelir Vs44r7 - lif - Si;D iii4l° , ' , Viett.streer, neat 40 years.. i . • '..! 4,itoriil:4.,,;"o't•''',4l ~.. YeoTrd4q# . 4 - ►LIS AWLOC :111,,43A4LIfintit911#940, 007 Edwards, L.,q. 141 the ti yraf:iif his, ag . . ta . ,. s A iglii 'Oh the 23d ult. ill the gist ye ar` erf'hetve, 4....., t of Birmingham. . 'Jar i'=, !;. r ' r.i. .. : ' ~...,..,i , On the 15th at. at 'Baltimore, - 4,n, America. .N.'l ii i fi l sitkiiy, 414erOant„Nrmerly Ai 2.gpratat.-114 tr ' • Willi a Piliq or (*hi HinZfr,,,g4i.iticlitile*thiotth tte s tr y, a t (W.-various ,wdo Amusing theSiIiCITIV Awde die k f lir.", at a mark t and v;hile oneAt.ttieknyau,p.ulih4fAr pp_ ,„,:r of his plsint, his runt srli);led a 4slditiril ti,, , e;7 1 „.„,. , u r iti:. fire towattb' The. 4)9t where Mt, Mkt(tby WO r - ,,.,,0i1g in t tic: gArden ; the incbticholy ociklAirttehoc. WV . 1 ,7 0, 01$ fall ‘Neltr rl4roviv,ll hi:. hcut. aigt.tr: ptinrca .4 1, .fiq" l ' ' attFrwalUs witiiout utter L 1) a , ciiti.2 .... t`jf t :,..... - ------ -",---- ~,„ HICK W ATE R AT. 1.014,0014 Olildi" L ' ° •-.- i MAW, , 111:' '' itter IS I.lr,tiling,.?.£l win. a(rer,ii. i..4.ttyipcio.,, s ; ',.. - . ;'. •