The Sun. — London, England, 1813-03-06 00:00:00

t , Jl' !Ls EIIBA.G it s a id he must .treglAss on Lididgcsie e of the House, under the._ very im .oot eire w uqauce of th e qaestion, to make tome ohservatiaus in reply to the. Honourable_ Ile, was extremely glad to find the tp,eiiioit in his hsrals, making, as he had;done, the • Ititsle force of his speech ; a - direct, manly, and isid attack on his Majesty's Government. however, say there never was a more unjust than that of sconfounding'his Ma of 1807, with the legal advisers of Perceval, so far train ..iden if with the Cabinet, studiously ab 'Ping any document coming from it fit that period. Ile would disclaim with Mr. Perceval in the transaction; )een it part;; in the counsel of her ss . „ and he would say, to involve the was unfair and .uninst in argument, tits candid in the Hop. Member, The ltd, lie would now. come at once to er Royal ,Highness ; • and if he spoke, uness it Wo u ld b e as t h e l etter of her well won't! it hive been for her it telt advisers as she formerly bad.* complaint that was • made of the refused to read her letter, it was !use to judge of the merits of the par t long and settled separation which, • was a matter of private arrange tg .ago the'trince had determined )ondenee should take place, and he the Honse that this was not the telt had been, sent hack. •Bat this founded on a supposition that some , ad been inflicted on the Princess kilts that were placed on the in— tween her and her daughter.— ' t 'its to the, Lionse flow the case 7 " it would see that no such punish ' q ; ite aded. Wh en t h e P r i ncess Ch ar l otte ' na sal', the Prince altered the arrange- . 'hick the Princess had been aecus , "et front o nce a wee k to once a tort less intetruption of her stadia Might e quent journies to London, ttnt it was (-) require the alteration to continue during the Princess's residence at was the whole of what wits inag- ‘ great infliction of punishment. and, guilt, and he wits sure the House as lie did, to be a- matter -in no it to justify Royal the letter of her respec t to the condoct of the Prince, lily in his ,power to secure sound :died in all the heads of the Law, .ch, to advise oierely to one p o int Is should , be placed on the inter- nil the Princess and her daughter.--. vas a stronger imputation cast on was' cast on the Prince, by the - legal le letter of the Princess--it .-waS an Country against their Prince, and ' the, child . against her Parent.-- Par,agraphs o f the letter that the clinting pais!graph about the most r eprehensible.; - tor lfbrr tee.stulfloartl,eoyie trslp ' olsen to the Bi4 l OP of Prin cess no the sub -411 t , n her ie part t o have ;he ceremony e eould have told her that it Was Ma ts wish it should not _vatic p ;4 lace till bad attain e d her 18th : Year. The. ' Sure, would feel. the Prince had duty ;,and that his consultation with edncation of his 'child whS a P ro Q f people, by referring for advice to tail that he had s hewn an anxious de e the. prerogative of educating his Aka just S'ense of its great importance. utility !athy any m eans just to infer that any cri i,,was imputed, to the Princess for the sePa'' the a me was su lti, i i ent to justify the restraints, ss "104 to be considered, merely. as 1""t -an-ft:4g"ktiOn' arising out- of the unfortunate sh e c i t i ( '''"f the separation.' He would IMO -141, " ( itt s Nlemher ,hads not 'laid any Parlia she'4°";ladsv for 'hi s amendment, not -hay ;l.4 ‘that course ot s pr ocee di ags he vrould 01.(..tha Report WU laid on the table ) , and 4 he' should'. o ppdse )14 motion. The,. "I euer a l I n alluded t o personally, he ° .oit to make.a few-observations ; he did 041,1‘‘: kit to he was called upon to defend' 4 'ast - Charg'e having been an ad :. 4) l e'Prineeis ~ f , or for Itaving given . his ad -fi4r. not being 'alp/longer her adviser. As' ", st. Point, he had t() say he, ions. cam hs:1111806, to attend h er Royal Highness , ilea th, to assist. in defending' her Royal itiBjrain the 'charge at 'th at time made . 4(1 ?er:---did he - do wrong in n o t w i t hh o ldi ng ; Ic e ? As to th e. s e c o n d point, was it ex he should tell what advice lie had given ? ti n 't• think he onghtla I . l,,ealled upon . to 'rc na a defendant, tilt(' he certainly 1-4 act very p ro f ess i onally if he disclosed'lee lie haa.given. He had„ h owever , the • ot being..able to'say, atilt his opinion iplete unison With . that of Mr. Perceval, ant at. that time, in the Cabinet, or. in •deal situation. lie also had the ,consola- Niti",,Y, that his advice laud been successful in 4,4, her Royal Highness against the charge i . tt i''lt!d against her • He would not, how to ea tempted to commuttic' ate what that • u nte , .e agieed with_ w h at h a d b een pub is di (1.1)? •PerceVal, that thro u gh out t h e cwl',ll,n4l ession he could notdiscover any thi ng t"r t' , uk there was any just jounda isipoiittu, cha rge - that was preferred. On the eould 'only s a y it Was frinn no act ite*wa s no lon , -er a legal adviser of " ' Slhad • d - , doubt vo un :tioice of per Sons intich better able to give her advice: tp.s. - Las szrt 1 4 , 11 . h e was' Oappointeci, in the, Std 1, a just heard ; expected to have 4 r t rent y i t° th, ,illusions made to the less icl ' ,4et nan. In hislit opnion, "ate tint which'was made, him think 61; The „,iO4Posed to much difficulty and' dan -I)tii:lS' tite l l l ! le'I-4 014 had made no satisfactory . 1 1 4. 41 ) lt ,.;,")- MeMber below hli n oh . t "tongh to si . iy the Reg ent h a d tv„, 1 n 4 ''ktS of edtkentang his► atigh. ~h e en handed about, in d w 1 kit ter it ittic ° -4"er sv._.,s• accused by Subo rne d . the 'natter to rest here il { _~~~~ was a denidi of justice to the Princess ; .for thin re ►soil he would stippori the amendment of his llon. Friend. Mr. WoaTLEY said, he felt very'warmly on 1 - 1 k oceasion, as a man of hohour and a Gentler:;! but he conic( not vote either for the original tf,. : - tion or the ameridment. He must at the_sz:o! thiie say, it was 'hot the speech of the Noble Lord that induced him _to 'come to this detertnination., for he had left the points which are the thest ma terial 'in the discussion without any answer. He considered this a most-gallindand disgt aceful snb-. ject, no less than dragging the Royal Family be fore the House. The true question was, whether Ministers had done their duty, first to theicKiag, : and secondly to their country. In his °pintail,,. the four Commissioners appointed in 800 had gone farther, than they where rciinired to do.—The Commission were to eXamineinto a . charge of ou , e kind only ; but from the 'evidence brought to - sup, : port this, they formed another, and thus.exceeded their jurisclietkon. If their Repok was only to go to the. King, this circumstance would not have. been mattThal ; but tu;it was to go to the Princess, it mt.; sure to be productive of such difflettlties as no woman could submit, without complaint, to the imputations that. were cast upon her. But, passing by this Report, the next to be considered is that of 1807, which'is a complete acquittal a s to every point! This the Nobk Lord has not de- Aied in. his speech ; but the Ministersof that day ont o only acquitted her Royal Hightte4s, but went farther, and adsised his Majesty. to.. receive the Princess at ,Co:.irt. With such a Report in exist ence, ;why was it necessary now to ransack the -evidence of 180(1, and to rake together the docu- . ments of that period, to found a•Report,upon,. what regulations were necessary to govern _the in tercourse between the Peinceis and ; her Daigle- ter?' Ddeuments, in 'critshint; which. the 'Noble. Lord had formerly 'been a party - . ff,: instead of such an unjustifiable proceeding, his Royal ness the Prinee,Regent had been advised to say, am the father of this child . , and I will act as a fa-. thee is 'empowered to am' Prince of these realms,. and I Will exercise my piirogativeof edar eating the successor to the throne- 7 -the country, would have been satisfied, in his opiniOn,. as he did not conceive the Princess was so popular as'to fear thatsuch advice ‘vould not have been noiver-, sally approved of. The Hon. Member said,, he had athigh feelings for ,Royalty as any man ; hitt he must say all proceedings like these Contribute to pull it down. He was vc.ry sorry we had a fa mily who do not take warning from what is said and thought concerning them. They .eemed to be 'the ouly persons in the cduutry . who were wholly, regardless of their oUrit welfare and .re spectability. He 'would not have the Regent lay the flattering unction to his soul, 'and think his conduct will hear him harmless through all these • transactious. He said this with no disrespect to him or his family : no•alan was more attached to the House of 'T;, - oulswick Olen he was ; but' if he bad a sister ia the same situation, he would say she was exceedingly ill treated. Sir &mutt, RoNIILLY:said, the Hon. Wlnher wag,:niiittike,trns to flee nature of the powers gi ven to the Commissioners iii !SOO. He had no an • • .thority forsaying the Noble Lor ds lad of4crtmsty entered on other points besides thOse whiCh were 'referred to then. He" Wouldask the Hon. Meth,- her', if he had ever read the commission ? ..ffe (sir Samuel) had seen it,, and if be did not very !olds' forget it, it went to. direct the four Noble LottiP to intjuire into all the facts contained in the state ment of the Princess of Wales, which had been submitted to his Majesty ; among which there were other matters, beshies those forming the grounds of the principai charge against her Royal I lighnes,L Mr. SMITII fully participated in what fell from the ,Hon. Member wlio spoke lait but gm; if his sister ha j d been treated its the PrinCess had been, he should feel extretncly sdre. He regretted he could tint see his,way clear how Justice could be done to. the Princess., and therefore he wtslied his Hein. Filelid would explain what further pro ceedings he had in Contemplation. :. Mr. PoisrsoNny could not agree to. the mf.nion of his Hon. Friend, yet he. was plmOst inclined :so to do, frOm the admirable, incomparable, resist- , less elriquence with Which he urged it. He would .ask,iS if com p etent for this House to grant the prayer Of the Princess's Letter 2. The Report of 1806 aaght not to be laid hefote the , House. Ts there any thing.. in it thatought to be, stC.initted to thir consideration ? Suppose the Repqrt on the table, what "could they do With it 4? could: they address the . Regent for a trial ? Could. they con demn Could they ; acq uit,?- This i trit4 an at tack on the Government ; and the defenee 7 of the' Noble Lord worthy of the :newspapers ,which ad vocate his 'cause. He denied that any. person in dppositiOn'lptd had any connection with the pub lication of the .papers, •or with any part of the transaction, he disclaimed MI knowledge of all proceedings therein, and he should despise any one who . could make the Royal,. quarrels a source to prove a stepping-Su - me to Office : he liad meter so done ; .those be acted with bad never-so done ; and he wished he could say at:H . l)9Ol for the living and the dead, an d that all co u ld - l a y th e i r l ian a s on their hearts and say the same. • Ile despised such . base arid desitictible coniluet from the bottOrn . of his 8661. _ . 'l‘ll. WILITURPAD said, after the question asked .1 Of him by his Hon. Friend, Mr. Will. Smith, he naghtf,' perhapi, be ailbwed to make good a defi ciency in his former speech, by explaining what. 'his further views and intentions were, provided be should succeed in his motion df to-night, and oh- Hip the Report alluded to in the Letter,of the. Princess of Wales to the Speaker. it certainly was his inlention, in the event of success to his •fie,t motion, to have followed it up ,by motions for such Papers as might appear necessary for the fur ther elucidation of tin: business, and for the jus tification or conviction of the person who haft thrown herself., as a last resource, upon the justice and mercy of the Uouse. But the fe* hours which laid passed since he moved his Amendment, had so entirely ‘altered the state of the me, 'that , lie should not now even press a ,d3"vision., The most complete defiance on the part of the. Princess 'of Wales had been thrown out, in the presence of those persons who had the fullest opportunity of inquiry, and whose duty it was to inquire into every part of her conduct—who have the mcins searching her Very heart,, So completely. did she flow - appear aeoOitted Of all possible ituF;Lita tion of blame, even . , by the re - csmrs from whom the aspe.,ions tverg, by the would, siviios,2d, t!:: I t. ;It:port, to baV been thro;Vn up:yA her, IC:1S ip Lis - mind lIIIIICCeSsary to i3r:'s; i-olttur to a Vision Her blow ...core was aeknow: entire—ecimplete: To such restrictions as t Iss-I.nm! 1.?..:, - ent in his capae4 of father to the: Princeiis'Clarlotte, or by the advice of his Mini-' stern; might ibink proper to impose upon-dief tercourse,with her daughter, she.)nost submit. it was her lot. But she hadThesatistatlion of know ing.that her reputation henceforward was, , by the confession of all, without imputation or reprOaeh. —From these considerationt he should not press a division: Mr. CANN/NO enuld not suftizient4- praise the honest and manly warmth them) by Mr. Whit bread : but all motions similar to the present he should resist. He never wyuld 'Consent to sup port that which, however plausible at the mo ment, would endanger the peritianent interests of the country. Besides, the necessity Of Such mo tions is lessened, if the object be to declare the entire acquittal ,of the Princess ; because, froth the tone of the Noble Lord, as well' as his 're peated deelarati»ls of her Innocence, further pro, cecdings are unnecessary. lie was prepared to assert anti maintain, that the words and meaning of the Cabinet Report in 1807, conveyed a com plete, satisfactory, and unlimited acquittal. He would not have supported the late Minute of the Council had he' been in the Cabiniet ; he should have been content to say that his Royal 11;glineis was,the master of his ownsfamily ; as Father and Sovereign lre had a right to direct and cantroul the conduct of his daughter, and to regulate whom she should see, and whom she should not see.— • The Minute, he was "glad to hear owned, left . ac quitted innocence, as it was, before the Council made their Report. it is hard to stop these dis cussions here, but it is better they should be so done, than left where it would be difficult to con trout their etrculti.tion. . ,Mr. disapp'roved of the origin 11 ',pub lication of the letter us the cause of all the mis 'chief. world not :have raised the flame by calling in the aid of other persons to assist 'the Cabinet, which has given to.the proceeding a cha . racter of uneasiness and anxiety, that has been very injarions, . The SOLICITOA-GENEAM. maintained that the Prifu was phieed, by the appearance of the letter In priilt, in• a sithation that forced bi'n to take the .opinion of grave and hononrable per-. sons, as.to the line he was to take bpod this sub ject.. He denied being a party to the publication of the extract which appeared in a newspaper some days. back. What took place was this, be' and Mr. Adam, and Mr. Sekvll, were not Caliel to revise the: proecedings of tie Council in 1806, but. were commanded by the Prince to 'giVe their opinions' - upon, ,qtiestions propoted to them.— They met at his 'house, locked by all, ttie papers While the ~abject was in discussion they!destroy ed all the copies but cue, and he had not . seen the papers 'since, till lie was shown the extract that was printed in one of the innvpape,rs the cuter day. Mr. NrOtt'kE requested MA'. C. Johnstone to with draw his motion. :ITr. C:J/Thiy:toUe'refused' sO to do, adding, that it u - a , . a proud day for him, be cause it Batt completely established the innocence of her Royal Highness the Princess of The vestion was put, and Afr..C. Johnston e ' s maul) was neguti*erl without a division. The House then adjourned. LAW aE PO COURT OF CHANCE.R.Y, MARCH 4. in the Court of 6hancery yeiterdair, WATEtis v. a motion made win; by Mr. ILAuT, on be half of the plaintiff; for an order to remove the\ defendant from the sitnation.of General Manager of the Opera -House-, • and for an order or injunc tion to prevent tke defendant from further receiv ing the monies or Ole Theatre. Mr. 1 tcnanns, on behalf of the defen;;Ant, de sired the motion might he ordered to stand over till the plaintiff'S Counsel could be furnished with the copy of an.afli(hVit this day made by the defendantow his behalf, without -which this im portant :notion could not by possibility be heavl. The Counsel for the Omuta consented to the motion standing over, provided a copy of the de fendant's-affidoit in answer to those of the plain tiff might; be this night furnished , to thein. This arrangement was acceded to, and the ,mo tion ordered to stand over. _ . ,ate:;, "presentation,. 1 0 ~, ty's tabinet -lie Princess. tiie,llll.ying himself pr,„ti Oltiiiie:l from si;2, 1 t,' tti.tliis subj ect t Lip) i } i!i, 0g a party w orj,), i;44101 never ht 0 ,13:. -'' l oPil High ii es , o d e .,t '" tin eliai avters , i ,i, , tail 1 ) , 1 , ~,,„:„. aik„.. , , I (.. I, 1/4,t ie' liable Lor , l sal ' tl l 1 . - c go rtter ot he I ' d 3a . , °lttiitli plain IV3lo'' ' :1 4 Ilvisc z i, I d . tr •440 iv11 4( 1 Slll ` ,l,c 0 prince to t lie i s e l ' , rnitee haring , N O tot fo r th e Li ~,,,,, ';', wit. ti es antler t'Lli! ienl,p ttineil. •ThiS 14, il,ilittlt; sail. lonl : 4 cot, , ,' that no eorre4p ~a 7 , totilii acquaint i,,t letter w hi ( ilitii 41,1,/,t, int ‘,,,,,y, 41k, tiistinient hi },, rat, it 3' the restrail halts, orci.ourst :it lit,. li t **tout :it tripe` , Vial, DWI ti,eD Goal;l . Nein Was ihtei .t, ll'ent,to Irindi It ; ! ni ent tinder ivIJ 0 0 . , ; •:. °41 ,l to set hi :10) itgbt, th at l e , : 1 ,P 6t peit by f reci do er : 'it tt 1 0it 5 .,' Zger than at .vo,r l ; :,,11)(Ist)r. l'il orrij,..!'fied into ot irt k a 1 erence t , t , 0 ,!otild Qt se e i t ~,,gif .114,Y1 ,hatileient , io x 1 Ighatis. I l i rht ,i. , 1 e (lid all that r ni o ' 'l4ite. Ife 0 6' , ' 1 , 4 , 1 Oei he ''hurt jet a : 'irat restraint the! pel'll'se bet weei 0i,. ; ,- 4 ere nev er tv Or " i , I Y otte than % rot 4( "iser s of tII4 4; 1 % ,I PPeal to tle. 1 i,,,e1 t appeal ttl oeir 'lt •of al! i 1 :tic,ig Mticli relates co, :I tafir inaticin, 1 It i())7',li lii, A ,iitle 3i)t 44bill**T, till! t , '''t, witii a w, )., f ormed, he ;;4,,,',,y's express 0 Vrincess 1 i,,i'l'ill',l y, lie W.; iitil % t . get) his (! 11 , 11 ;, , , of P 44,, il On ; 1 i ):? '!' 11 . 'ove of li fit, i ";'. 't (, to, t he tititi., al : 1$ i;') t ° xe •,' , ii . !List_ toy igh t , tii.,10,..5,. i lt wat i:ri with iv, 0, , ' 45 N it I Vii.. :ll Haiit, ' t,11. 6 'iti / IAV i i 'koe : i i t lqj t i 11 ): V i 11" I ,p , ;, I' 1 (1,1 '►i ,, lirl - I. qci lilt, ln itt i ~ri the •-,-1 Ot .t4t 4t . 1 r° ' 4 1 . 1)t ,' i 1 t rc !' ~, i )h ;e o . C ~ ,, p i , 411 0 , 1 • pb• :I - ` kll ow - ' 0 1 ., % 11 " ; 1114 01 a : a. ' 0 :-. Al. r 0 ,„ )e l , (4 the 01' ., t 4 7 t o r f 4, i' d ifi k lil ' fir, 1 ,0 4 , Ilit e ., -, it f t , 4 1r )1. - " 1 kh , ~,, 14 c e; ii- ! , .: 4 1 , 1)t,, t Alt , : 7,itisl L ., -,': ( M v • er )1 t (1 1 ice i , : i s , 15 , ‘,..!. t ,i• , 1 1 si S tdi 11 1 10 d' ' i , 04; 4,1 ' the t 0 11 : : '"il k „ i ''', l 'l•ti o . t ,: 1 1 41,,, [ l r iii \ '‘.l'io n t 4P A ' /I 'l l tf p lit. , I , ( ; fiet:ito Ate I . 14 i iiii 'lg I } l ~,,,, 4 e ,, 4 1(: ( 1i t , 4 . , 111 1 . 1 ) ti ~.,.' A i t - ,:i IS Ai Y Ni it "' ,i, A:4l, ni p d •ed ' l t' 1, 1 , 411, i1 -ell 1 i . .44/ 1 v l. ,:4; ! iiir l ir ir 0 1 ;',, : -. 4,1 - Poio t $ 1 Ili s , .. i . f 4 t i . i ., o wn N , ftik,:, vOy ti i 1 i ii ;,,,:ily 111411. 11 I ' l h e t I , .`, •r , _ "111 J TKr, scoußT OF KING'S BI NC: I GU I SLL, NIA Ay .5. TUE KING 11. JIM • This was an information filed by his Majesty's Attorney-General against the defendant, .for gross, setintialotts, and wicked libel, published 01 two distinct days, viz.. on the 30th of .1a4a,t., 1 -1812, and on the 27th o f Svtetnher in the same year, reflectirrg on -the Character of his;.. /Loyal Highness the Duke of 'Cumberland ; to v,-Yrch in formation the defendant pleaded Not Guilty. Sir WILLIrM Gm; Row (the Solicitor-General) ohserved, that this was a prosecution for an offence o f that description, wherein one man has libelled another, and that most atrocionily, and with the intent too 'of depriving that other of his pod name.. 'He liad long and often heard of cases of libel, but any thing so base as thetpresent he never knew. file Gentlemen of he .;jury would understand that' the object of this lianderOus libel was no other than one of the, sons of the Monarch, his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland, awl the sub . pet of it was the eir'etunstancc.. of the attempt made by a desperate menial in his service, to as sassinate hint, and whose self-destruction was the consequence of it. Here the Leirned Solicitor- General ewunerated the facts respecting that hor- Able attempt, in 'which his Royal Highness was miraculously saved, front destruction. He theu proceeded to state the libels which appeared in a Sunday Newspaper, of which the delendint was the proprietor, since the imPrisomactit of his fa flier, 'the late proprietor; the . purport of which wCre), 'as charged by the ti , tormation, that Sails, the assassin,. 461 not tall by his own hand; but that lie was slain by another, meaning the Doke himself. For the Defendaiit, Mr. •StAHLETT addressed toe %-onrt at considt:nble length. /-.l,!coumw a f.- ed on the language and en.h tit large, that no inuendo coutd be drawn whereby any imputation could b cast upon Date of Cumber, tad, to the eifect which the forma...ion set f01..h. He argued vv-itli :7,insi :lc r.! !t; ingenuity, that ,it did not (evi-ii if it true that , Sellis lid I not cn.mnitted th.ij; therefore the Duke at Combed:lntl I td eatiied t: iii death. All he contended the nublicati . on was invely that rumour had announced sonte.sns:-• picions that m Selii3 did lint destroviiiinself; it never went the length Of asserting that the Rohl Duke, was ppivy to his de , itruction contrary, itmeiTly so stated Cle'runiour, and ...x.- preSsed nothing, that could give it the colour of imputing 'so foul au act to that, Illustilons Pet.- sonage:_ Sir Wm. GARROw made au urimate'd reply. Lord ELLENBOROUGH St1111:11ed LIP t!;!! and commented upon the case, leiving it to the Jur y ' to decide, who, without quitting ti.e box, hro:Thr. in a verclidt of Gui/ty—The trial lasted five huuri. , There were two or three inaccuracies in the Report of the Privy Counsellors relating to,,the Princess of WALES, Which We iu ier tUd yesterd:v. In line 70 from the head of the Report, for re§e- . floes aud restrictions, read, " regulation and straint." The latter part of 0 , 9 sentence:begin . - ning line 3 from the top of the 2dcolumn, should be its follows " respecting the conduct of- I , et Royal Highness the Princess of WaLEs, appears to have been pressed upon ;he, dttent . r:i of your. Royal Highness, 41nd to have been tr.:1:;- initted by your Royal Highness, in attic advice of Lord Liu aLow, and upon grounds of public duty, to his Majesty's confideutial.ser— vants, by whom they were submitted to his Ma jesty's consideration." instead of " .114ble to misconstruction ".iri tllc 9th line of the last p',4ra-, graph, the word's should have been ''liable to be understood." Lord CASTLERE AGH:B- mine wee omitted in the list of the Privy Connsellors tvho' signed the Report ; his Lordship signed it imatc diately after Lord Smuourn. THE C.).II4TORICkS. The Oftwiait' with MOZART'S accompanithents,. was lust night performed at Drury-lane Theatre, under the direction of Sir G. SMART. The Band W3S ample, and nothing could be More correct than tite whole of t)e perfocir.- ance.. Mrs. DICKONS, Mrs. BLAND, C. SMITH ; SPRAY, and BELLAMY, particularly diltipplidie . d themselves. A Concerto on the violin, V:at= per formed by Mr. VAcCABI,' in a yery capital style. The appearance of the Theatre as .we noticed be fore, was in a style of. Gothic Architecture, up-, pcopriate and.impressive,• EAST DAY.-ASSOCIATION FOR THVA ELIE' , OP TITS "MANUFACTURING AND LABOU POOR. , e *re authorise!" to say, that at a 'Meeting of t :imilee of the Asociation of the People cal eel ~eetnodists, late in connection 'with the Rev. John '%Vesley, at the City-road Chapel, London, it agreed to make a public Collection op the cuing 'Fast bay,-- the 10th inst, hi behalf of the Ase,o. elation for the Relief arid Benefit of the Mantitac tuTing and Labouring poor, 'and it is . hoped that the principal .eo4n!;regations In that connemou, lind of other religious deniurtinittions, twill . follow their exturqde: • An Inquisition was taken on Tuesday, - at the Pigeons at,Eastote, no the Oxford;road, the bo:ly of an unknowd persdn ) who di,!,l (pence of a wound he had received on the prece;l- tug day.- The deceased ;had been hron : . , ,ht to the house by two friends in a po3t-chaise; an.' they lett hitn, hut sent a medicul man to his assistance. 1r nidtieared that i 4 dnek had taken place betwixt the deceased aMI another person, but there: vvaiz evidence to slim who the sin vivor wa4. The ceased had been wounded in the left side, ball 'which bad., lod4d, could not be eNtracted. The Jury had ~no evidence to diseuver who parties" were, and a verdict of murder, some perBpll . 9ryersons . unknown • STAMVORD, Felt. 19.--4111r0i441 'the 111:1Cfl ble exertions of, the Magistrates of the county of kutland, assisted by thoselor , this bornqg-h, and the eXcillertt offiecrs'of the corporation, live per tsons have already been fully coin:bitted to the 'castle of Oakhtn . , to take their tr)als at the-as sizes Qn the 4th of March, fai' a burglary at.ens7. ten on, , near this,, town, i n the dw.elling-house of the Rev. Richard Lateas.----The 'prisoners William Almond, alias Black Will, and Eilevarti .Hare, both blacksmiths at Wakerley, in -Nor thamptonshire, (the former manager of rthe btesi ncss of Widow Hill at that, place), John Holmes of Stamford, mason, .Henry Millington, a well known seller, of Banbury cakeS at fairs and mar kets, (which calling he folinsved to disgnise , Svor&e pursuits), and whosir wife' is: now confined in the common gaol of this borough 101 shop-lifting; aal Ann Hill; widow, of Wakerly ; the last--moued on ,111,ieion of receiving goods knowing them to , be ~vies apprehe n d e d at L-43Orti on 11 , oriday, by Mr. the, Ciaoler..fOr Itornogn ; the. other Offenders have. , been appre hended chiefly tin oukb the !Attivity Serjeant, Mr. Reed. All the plate stolen from the Rev. Mr. Lucas's house was dkcov,ered Saturday night, through. the information •al One of the ptisoners,in a corn-stack at' Wah.criLv :rod at, large quantity of drapery and hosiery gor;ds al SO have been `found in a stubble-hovel iat u - dock of James Torkington, Esq. near this tikfT. The latter goods 11101 been . stolen .. front a sh:y Beiltoti, iai Rudand, on the night. of se'dnight. )an riesday Penelope Watson hilly committed .to the ga,..d of this liornah, strong suspiciOn 'of :being acct!sysiry to a burglJvy on& robbery lately committed in the (twe:Co house of Mr. john Cunnington, of lidl.oa, and having received severat of the good; froni the sa'...d itwelling-honse, knowing the s‘.110; ; f to have been .stolen ;.,and.with having: &y eti 4eve ., ; :. - nary to the barglarylit Mr: Lueto's,.of Casteroni and also with being in this porougtt ai cuntm:ti receiver of stolen goods, knowing the s..tite to be stolen: • On Thursday night a tall man, genteelly droi , - ed,- . WaS found hanging on the iron rails of SPBNCER'S garden, near the Green Park. LL.: hun b , r himself with a new cord, In the agonie , . death he had kicked the loose.stones which wer, under him to a considerable HIGH W ATEIi• AT LONDON BRIDGE:TO- Nl. ) Morning, 11 minutes after S. I Evening, 46 4111114 re: alter