The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1820-08-31 00:00:00

The Lord Chaucel:or olmerted, that if the Noble Lord had considered the interpretation incorrect, he should have en &wowed to elicit the tree mese of it by potting questioos. lard Herniates spologieed. u How lino; did her 3lajesty female at Naples. A. About duce or four months. a Hid the witness make any other *bewail.** 'seep. * kat she has stated, ms the saisinal condect of the Princess set Fiergami at Naples. A. Only that they were very faun. use with one "mother. u. How early did that familiarity COIIIIOnIet. A. The m oment they reached Naples. 44. Were the sesvaists in general in the habit of gni.; into the wpm of her Royal Highness without knoctileg. A. No. Q. Did she obeerve how Deegan. conducted himself in this respect towards her Royal Hither..; slid he go is with rut biocides/. A. He motel koneked. Q. Diii soy part of her Esiglish smile leave bee Royal Highness at Naples. A. Not during oar stay, bat why. we went away front it amuse of them remained there. Q Where ilia her Royal Highness go to from Naples. A. T. , (tome. U. Which of the geotlemeit you have neeetirieed aces.- roiled her R.iyal Highness to Rome; did say of them. A. D.telor Holland. Q. Did the English Ladies *hot* yne mesetiosed amen. pan, her. A. Owe of them remained sit Naples. • Q. What Lady was that. A. Lady E. Forbes. Q. Hail her Royal Highness say English Lady lo her suite when she arrived at Rome. A. Lady Charlotte Lindsey. Q. When did Lady C. Lindsay join her Royal Highoess. A. As far as I can remember, the latter end of the . time we were at Naples. Q From Rome did bee Royal Highness go to Civil* Vecchia, autl from theme so Genoa. A. Yes. Q. Does the winless recolket the house its which her Royal Highness resided at Genoa. A. Yes. Q. Was there any other Englishman its the suite of the Finless. at Genoa besides Dr. Hollaad. A. Yes, Mr. How. nun. Q. Was there any other Englishman. A. No. U. Where did Lady C. Lindsay leave bee Royal Highness. A. At Leghorn. Q Do too recollect the situation of the Princess's and Hei ram's moms at Genoa ; were they *ear or disteot. A. They were very 'sear. Q. Whet separated them. A. A single MOM. • For what purpose was it used. A. The lowingeomid kept there. Q Was there a tl ugh that room. A. There was. Did they continue to sleep in those rooms the iamb time they were at Groom. A. They did. Q Did witness observe were for Royal Highs's* break at Genoa. A. Yes. Q. iYhere WWI it. A. In the small cabinet. • Du you know whether she breakfasted aloof. A. I kite se. n :Honsieur'Bergarni twice breakfast with her. Q. Was lie a currier at that time. A. No. (4. Who waited at breakfast. A. Luigi Hergansi, brother of the tithe r. Q. Does witness recollect any shrubbery belonging to the house at Genoa. A. Yes. Q Did Tow ever see the Norms walking in that shrub h.+ y. A. Very often. 44. Alone, or was any body with her. A. Monsieur Bee. canii was always with her. Q. \Vert. they walking separate or together. A. Together. Q. Was it any part of the witnesa's business at Genoa to make the Print-eat s bed. A. Yes, till my sister came. You have said that after you went into your owe bed. roots, the door between your room and that of the Prisms' was always sheet ; how do you mean that it was shut ? Her Royal Hielisteiis turned the key inside. What was the situation of Bergami's bedroom, with re- What to that of the Princese--were they opposite use between the bed-rooms auut her ? Yes. When you went into her Royal Highness's hed.roons in the mornings, who let you in ? The Princess herself called me foam my own room. Did you make any observation of the appearance of the Princess's bed, as to whether it bail been slept no rir nee !Hoer Arts not slept its. what do you meats by more ones not? It generally ap. ;wooed not to haws been slept in. You have told us that after you went into your own bed room, the Princess locked the dour on the other side; did sou over bear soy noise in the Princess's room, after she. had locked the door, like the opening of another door? The Interpreter (the Marchese Spinelli>) made a pause iu ' the epistolic of this question, when— The Duke of Hamilton rose, anal said that it was with great reluctance that he offered any objection, which Wright, perhaps, have better proceeded froin the Learned Counsel at the bar ; bet iu • ease of such deep importance as the pre sent, with the tree of the whole country fixed on the pro. ceeditsgs of their lArdships' House, he dial think that an In. serviette ought Iso be provided who ass sole to give • more explicit translation of the witarsa's answers. It was for their Lordships to decide, but as an isdividesl he triunity tl ght that the mode in which the present examination had thus far proceeded was very far (mom satisfactory. The Earl of Liverpool said, that the Gentleman now offi. rinsing as loolerpeeter at their Lordships bar, was, as their Lordships inittlit have observed, an excellent Itsliau scholar_ ; _ but it reitaioily did nut thence follow that be should be 51nally akillyd it. the idiom of usher latiqeages; and it per haps would be advisable that ilie A ey and Solicitor- Genrial should be instructed to procure the attendance of all Interpreter more accomplished in the French sod Eng lish languages, although he could not allow that Pity fault was to be found with the anode iu which the buiduess had been alone by the Geutleman at present in attendance. The Solicitor•Geurral hoped their Lordships would allow him to observe, that is very accurate Interpreter was in at. tendance un the oils. r side, who had only once objected to the iisterpietattun given by this gentleman. Mr. fironeham stepped firs wail, to the bac, but was pre. vented from speaking by loud and repeated erica of " Order! order A conversation then ensued on the %abject of another In. trrpreter, mute conversant with the idiom of the French and English langioares, being procured, in which Lords Essex, Harrowby, Giry, sod Erskine, severally look part ; all agreeing that it would he inure satisfactory, although they could not in juodice but - acknowledge the fidelity tool atten tion with which the Marchese Spinets(' had acquitted himself. This MR, also acquiescril in by the Duke of Hamilton. Mr. Brougham then said, that in justice to the Marchese, lie had to stale, that neither he our his Learned Friends had any complaint to make of his want of fidelity, nor, Mitred, of his LORI prieure, as far as regarded the Italian; but it certainly could nut hut lot 111111.11 enure satisfactory it Ilse interpreta tion were given by Wait Gentleman more skilled in the idiom of the French Ast.l Eraglnds, iw she rendering of which it was rout to be %sundered at that this Gentleman should find considerable difficulty, but rather that be lead out ucoosoutered mere thou hell hitherto beeu observed, as neither of those languages was has own. The Earl of Lives pool said, that as he sends rigour] the Solocitur.Gruesal would be provided with a Gentlernau pro. ;wily •ktlisal of built languages to-morrow, perhaps, their Lordships 055a0 . ..1 nut obj e ct Sc, the Gentleman wow in at. ',octane,' coons...iso. to act for the short remainder of the lorsiircss of tin , . olay—.(`• on:" "Go t " ) The Solo:slur Co.orral tiny proceeded wide the exami- PIMIIIM You have stated, that after you had retired to your own la.ohoonom the Princeus locked the Moor OU the utho . r aide; after thi;diol you ever hear any noise on the Princess% side of floe clout I somortisnra 'ward a noise like the upeosiu: of a dour; but I olos root kuuw whether it was the door of the met .e'tt room. Do son remember any other Motor un that side beside the ilor doors of the Pritoctss soul Dergaisti's lord rooms? There was • third Moor tutu the PrlllerSO%lll3.6lllllg lowa. Is that the room you have 100 fore tlebef il/Cll as being be tween the Po lie: as 's and Bergamo . .. tat.l rooms! The room tort wets the Iwo 'mosso had a third dour solo the Princess's After the wise like that of upeuiug a door. did you bear ly olbel noise to her fluyal hi:liana's bed 11111)11111, or was all quire ? All was quirt. %is. it your bodies*. at the per iod at which you have 10 " , OPenkitar, to make her Royal Ilighiress's sal ? y It was. Wes rubs what you were io the habit of doing to the bed? I laid the pillows *sal no aad the clothes. Did you in treatrul minsake the hell entirely? *nisi,. Q. Why not. A. Because there was no used to make it; it was already made. Q. Did. the witness observe whether the had was Is that slate always is the moraimr, whew she lest went into her Royal Higher's'. Ised.ruois., A. Gassmilly ; almost always. Q. Has the witleffe• 4014,1111 h loolrher Royal liiihisess staid st,Gruoa. A. Nearly two satioths, Q. Deriag the time her Royal illulsoess was at Genoa, did any relatioss of Hergaini enter er service. Yes; Luigi, the brother of this Hergsmi.i. , • Q. Du you reassmilwr rawsliaa. A. Yes. Q. Did she enter the merrier 'flier Royal Hi .* A. She irattlle4 with them, but whether she was in bey I Hichrimes senire wr out, I do not know. Q. Di.l she live in the looms of her Royal Highness,. A. She came expressly from Rome to her Royal Highest's. Q. Did she live in use house. A. Yes. U. DO pun know litriumai's mother. A. Yes. Q. HOW was *be called. A. La Dimon. Did • all the time Q. __ oho remade with her Royal Higherr .f he r beim% at &woo. A. Yes. Q. Du Too reelliteher asp chill of Itergasai's coming to her Royal Highementatems. A. Ye.. Q. What was the nowt EIS the child, and how old wee it. A. Vittoriee; it woe about two or three years nbt. Q. Do you remember ber Royal Higbeess while at Grows going to look at any boom in the country: A. Yes. Q. Did she say fur what purpose she weot to look at that Moir. A. Because she wished to take it, as it was removed ROM the English. Q. What do you mean by removed from the English. A. at said it was dislaut from the Wire, where there were too mi. What was her reasons fur sayisg there were too many Realists — Mr. Williams objected to the question, as the winners could trot be supposed to know say thing of her Royal High. Nese" motives. Q. Did her Royal Hie!mess say any thief more on that subject. A. Sbo only said she wished to take that home, because it was far from Germs and out of the way of the English. Q. Where did her Royal Highness go to from Genoa. A. To Milan. Q. To a house in the Plazz► Borromea. A. Not imme diately. - Q. How soon after her arrival at Milan. A. Two or three days. Q. Did say English perinea joie her Royal Highoen at Genoa. A. Yes, Lady Charlotte Campbell. Q. And her daughters. A. Yes, the olaughters alto, but they lived in a private house. Q. Did Lidy Charlotte Campbell aceompany her Royal 'Highness to Milan. A. She did trot go at the 114111 C time, but the day after. Q. Who travelled in the same carriage with her Royal !lighten from Genoa to Milan. A. William Austin and myself. Q. Did you see Bergami on the road. A. Yes. Q. Did you see or bear her Royal Highness say, or do, or give ally thing to Bergman during t►e journey. A. H. r Royal Highness often gave him sonsethieg to eat, and asked bim if lie wanted any thing. Q. Was that at the Inns or on the road. A. On the road. Q. In what capacity did Bergami serve at that time. A. He was on horseback in the dress of a courier. Q. Do yea remember the situation of the bed.roorns of OK Princess and Itergami at t►e Pisan Borromea. A. Yes. Q. Were they near ur distant from each other. A. They were sear ore to another. Q. How long did Lady Charlotte Campbell remain at Milan with her Royal Highness. A. Nearly a mouth, as far as I recollect. Q. Whets Lady Charlotte Campbell left her Royal High. mess, was there any English Lady rewiring. A. No. Q. Did any other Lady come in her place as Lady of hoarser. A. Yee. Q. How mows after lady Charlotte Campbell had left ber Royal Higbee's. A. Two or three days. Q. Who 'was jbe person that came. A. The Conutess 0141. Q. Before she came, did her Royal Highness any any thing to witness on the subject. A. She told me she Coun tess Oldi wished to come into her service as Lady of Honour, and that her Royal highness wished to take her into her service. Q. At the time of this conversation, did her Royal High. nets tell the witness who the Countess Oldi was. A. Only that she was a noble lady. 11. Do you know what relation the Countess Oldi is to Bergami. A. She is his sister. Q. When did you learn that. A. About two months after she came. Q. Did her Royal Highness give say other description of the Countess Oldi before her arrival, then that she was a noble lady. A. She wily said she was pretty. Q. Dirt the witness afterwards see the Countess Oldi. A. Yes, I did. Q. Could she speak French. A. Not at all. Q. Could her Royal Higher' speak Italian. A. Very little. Q. Did the witness ever observe the writing of the Canseten Oldi, so as to enable tier to say if she appeared to be& wo man of good /Aeration. A. I only observed that she wrote very vulgar Italian. Mr. Brougham observed, that Italian was sot the wit ness's own language. Lord Lauderdale made some observation which was not audible lelow the bar. Q. Did the witness make any observation of the manners of the Cosiness Oldi, so as to soy whether they were those of a geutlewomau---- The Interpreter observed, there was no such word in the French lauguage as gralleicossan.—(General laughter.) Mr. Brougham remarked, that it was a strange question to put to this Q. Did you make any observation of the manners of the Countess 0141. A. Nu. Q. Does the witness remember a gentleman of the name of William Burrell hiving with her Royal Highness at Milan. A. Yes. Q. How long did be remain in the family of her Royal Highness. A. Nut very lung; Ido nut remember the pre cise time. Q. Tell ns about how long it was. A. About two months. Q. After he went away did any other Engli►h gentleman come into her Royal Highness's service. A. No. Q. Whim did Dr. Holland leave her Itoyal Highness. A. At Verity. Q. MIS that during the residesee of her Royal Highness at Milan. A. Yra. Q. Did any Eng'ish person, except Mr. Hownan, remain with her Royal Highness after Mr. Burrell's departure. A. No. Q. Where disl her Royal Highness go to flora the Piazza Durmasts. A. Tu Como. Q. To the Villa Pineal. A. Tee. Q Du you remember stein at auy time before you left Milan, say gall. ry at the house in the Piazza Burromes. A Yes, round the louse. Q. goes the sitar.* remember being in that gallery one muraitig and Bergami. A. I did sot see him in the gallery. Q Where slid put see him. A. At his window. Q. What was hr doing. A. Opening his wiudose to call his servant. Q. What dress had he on at that time. A. A silk gown ; it was lame silk—a gown which the Princess generally put too in the Q. Had you area the Priacess wearing that gown before that lime. A. Yes. often. Q. How near to that time. A. Some days before. Q. After Mr. Hanell lea the Wage uf her Royal Highness slid any alteratiuu take place. A. What alteration do you meats Q. Did you observe any change take place is the family. A. There war more freedom, nsose liberty. Q. What did you oboes we. A. They played in the saloon ; Res genii and her Itaysi Highness played together sulks evening. Q. At what dial they play. A. Different games; frolics; blirdnean'a.buff.—(.4 laugh.) Q. Did the Prelacies play. A. Yee, aloe did. Q. To the best at witoreie reteilketion, did this happen Were Mr. Darrell left her R.ysl Higliwese. A. Afterwards. Q. Dad the witness stake say pesticides observation of say this; is the cooled of her Royal Highswoe sod Ber gson at Hulas or at the Villa Vißaal. A. No, wily that they were very free towards use somber. Mee did the Prisons go to the Villa d'Este. A. la the beginahig of &pee/saber. Here the Bart of Limpool sewed t►at the Hosea should adjsors. Adjoanied a few Wastes before Ave, till tea o'clock to immoral"' wooraiag. THE DUCHESS OF NORFOLK'S CASE. The great rase of the Duchess of Norfolk, which was briefly noticed in this Paper on 'Tors.lay, the St2d of this mouth. has since attracted very general attention, Isiah in Parliament anti with the public in Th e s i iii rkeiiy whicfi it bears in many of its circumstances to the Bill now pending id Par. figment we then remarked, and recited the points wherein the similitude was observable. The in teresting nature of the cue itself. end the circum stance of its having formed a very prominent feature in some of the recent debates in Purbameot, induce 'us to believe that a fuller notice of it. and of the parties concerned. than we then published, 'night toot prove unaceertible to our readers. The D itc he.., whose maiden deluation was Lady Mary Mors'aunt. was the dau ghter of the Earl of Peterborough, and was moored to the Duke of Norfolk on the 13 h of June. 1677._ The Eirl, hrr fithrr, presented the Duke on Imo morrinKe with 10,0001. as the leti)'s fosiont ; anti, us the Ouches Astro, rettled tut him for life tondo to the value of nearly 1,000% a year, with the reversion► out the failure of issue to the Duke's right heir. This circumstance, however, is denied by the Duke, who in his statement, acknowledges the receipt of the 10,0001. but genuses his lady of an. bounded extravagance. They flied together until about the yeti. 1685. the year e•f the accession of James the Second. when the Duke having re. ceived some account e•f die Duch's**s ga ll on . trim.. took her with him, as the Duchess states, to Frai,ce. and put her, although a Protestant, into * nunnery. It is certain, however, that the Duchess did go to France. *lore it seems she changed her religion, end became a Roman Catholic. Her Grace returned to England in May, 1689, and it is at this peraed that her edul. reruns intercourse with Sir John Germaine be comes apparent. She lodged with Sir John at the Cockpit for two month.; after which, think. lug it conveiiient to be somewhat more in privacy, she gave out that she was going to France, end removed to Vauxhall, to a house token fur her by Sir John Germaine. She there took the name of Lady Beckman, and Sir John was represented to he her brother. She lived at 'Vauxhall for two year., and then removed to a house on Millbank, where the Duchess end Sir John lived with as much freedom se if they had been married. Their servants here frequently paw them together in bed. The Duke being apprised of the Duchess's course of life, brought a Bill, in January. 1691, into the House of Lords. fur a di• vorce, but the Duchess end Sir John Gernasine contrived to keep the witnesses out of the way, and the Bill was thrown out. The Duke attempted second Bill in December, 1694, which in the is. unary following experienced a similar fate. chiefly, however. es it would seem, (tom the circumstance of there having been no previous proceedings for a divorce, n menet; et thoro, in the Ea:leant-bail Court. The ill success of these two Bills gave such confidence to the Duchess, that she placed very little, if any, restraint upon her intercourse with Sir John Germaine, and her familiarity with him became at length so notorious end undisguised, that the Duke caused ii third Bill for a divorce to be submitted to the House of Lords tau the 16th of February, 1699. The Dill sets forth that Henry Duke of Norfolk, and Earl Marshal of England, did some years sister marry the Lady Mary Slordannt q that she had for divers years lived in separa tion from him, sod hail unlawful familiarity and adulterous conversation wiit Sir John Germaine, Bart.; that she was guilty of adultery on her part, and had broken the bond of matrimony. Auld fur as much as the Duke had no issue, nue could hope fur any hut spuriuns issue to @peeved him ill his honours and estate, unless the said marriage were declared void by Act of Parliament, and he were enabkd to marry steam, he prays that the said bond of matrimony be, s a d i t is thereby enacted and declared to be dissolved, vacated, and void. The Act then enables the Duke to contract another marriage, and makes some arrangements respecting the pro. pert) , settled upon the parties by marriage settlements, &e. The Bill was read a first time in the House of Lords on Friday the 16th► of February, 1699. It was ordered that the Duchess of Norfolk should be furnished with► a cup} of the Bill, that the Duke should be hews" by Counsel to make good the alle gatio►s contained in it, end that the Duchess might have Counsel to attend at the same time if she pleased. We stated in our former brief notice of the Bill the orders made by the Howie, that the Duchess should he furnished with a list of the witnesses who were to be produced against her, with an account of their places of residence, and we also publish ed the singular order of the House respecting the mode of taking and authenticating the evi deuce of such of the witnesses as were foreigners. A specification of the charges alleged. made out with extraordiary precision, was also ordered to be supplied by the Duke's agents; and witnesses for the Bill were COlllll4lOl to undergo a preliminary examitiation by the Counsel for the Duchess, to authenticate the list of names, and of places of residence, previously furnished to the agents of the Duchess. This was done by the House because it was not thought to be just that the Duchess should be brought to' answer • great variety of charges, extended over aft imirfittite space of time, without being apprised of the names of her accusers, and enabled by sufficient notice to meet, and, if pos.ible, refute their allegations. By this proceeding.. the Counsel for her Grace were unaided to proceed with their crowetainination and defence without interruption, and the trial was conducted without the occurrence or difficulties or embarrass- merits to the House, in pursustice of the oulinsry course of judicial proceedings, sud in a manner tunas conducive to justice. %Ve shall not repeat the evidence adduced. It' is Iblifficiralt to say that it was couclusive of the alw legalisms continued in the preamble of the Bill, so that the only ques oat terminating the evidence, arose upon the propriety of Parliament,grantiog a divorce its the lint isistaiicee without the intervens lion of a an t in the isiferior Coon,. This question was, however, finally decided by the House of Lords in favour of the Crake;. but Meerut "Peirs entered solemn protests against the principle of such a met sure on every stage of the proceeding. Thit; Bill war.theo seat down to the Commons, where, in the it.Sth of March, 1700. the evidence was repeated, and the Couniwl ou both sides being heard. after some debates is the House the Ball was Buell, • •1r , fp s ”blt.l" SUPPLEMENT , I r". 417 TO THE LONDIPN GAZETTE ' OF TUZSDAT, AUGUST 49. Tot somowtso ARB ItITGACTS. Extract from a Report from Brigadier-General bovetort to the Alerts& General, dated Camp, sew Boorimapoor. Apia 16, 1819. 1 have Mr Mown to transmit, for the information of his Excellency the Coulimaisder.in.Ckief, a general rehire of killed sod n0.'11410110 the form under my cumasmol, daring the operations against the fortress of Ameersttur. together with returns of captured ordaswee sad military Mores. General Return of Killed and Wimoded daring the opera. glans against Asarerglior in On Man Nader the Cumulated of Brigadier-General Dovetos. Camp, Asseerghor. April 11. 1819. Killed —Bowerman-1 Laeutewast.Colowel, serjessis, drummers, 5 rook and file. Natives--1 subidar, 2 havildars. sagas,, 34 sepals. Wome4aid.—Ewrupeass-2 Majors, I Captains, 6 Lieute nants, 7 arrjesois, 66 rank and file. Natives-3 jemadars, 5 itavililars, 174 rank and Ole. Nantes of European Officers Killed and Wurandril. Killest—His Majesty • Royal Scots--Lieuteaaad-ColOwel Fraser. Irowisded—Major Macleod, Deputy Quarter-Mauler-Gene. rel. and Major A. Weldon, Madras Artillery, slightly. Captain J. W. Frith, Madras Artilleri,suil Captain Borman, Ist Battalion 7th Regiment Native lnfaatry, slightly. Lieutenant James Bitted, his Majesty's Royal Scots, mod Llestesant J. Adair mud Juba Haomsh, her Majesty's 67th Regiment, severely. Lieutenant S. D. FAILITC, Madras European Regiment, Lieutenant Coonsill, Bengal Artillery, and lieutenant Lies, llainiMsy Artillery. slightly. J. DOVETON, Brigadier General. • Return of Killed and Watioded is the Field Division under the Command of Brigadier•Geseral Pritsler, C.B. during the operatious against the Fort of CupsularuoT. Killed—Europeans--I go,iga, 1 serjeasit, 3 privates. Natives-1 private. IVostuded—Europeans--t Captain, 2 Lieutenants, 1 sea ' jesut, 3 corporals, 16 privates. Natives-1 'abider, 1 jemidar, 1 havildar, 25 privates. • Nantes of Officers killed and wounded. Kilted —Ensign Elliott, Rase corps. Wound ad--Captain Din, Assistant Quarter-General. Lieutenant Taylor, his blejvidy's 22d Light Dragsters. `imstesain Silver, Ms Majesty's . 63i1 Regiment, Sauk bat talion. .. 1 . 1 Return of Casualties is she fusee under the etionnsaad of Major-Geoeral Sir N.G. Keir, K.M T. during lb* oper alums against Kaselkbeinta, fruits tho 4111 la the 6th December, 1819, inclusive. Camp, at ftssulkheisiss, December 10, 1819. Detecbomot of Artillery-1 drummer, I rauk and Als wouaded. Hie Majesty's 47th Regiment—Major Miilmwortli, 1 rank sad file kilted; 16 mak sod file +goaded. His Malady's 65th Regiment-3 rook sad file killed; Cap tain Juba Misted/tick, Lieutenant J. K. !Mersey, !I rank sod Ale wounded. Ist Balletic)* Id Regiment Native la6stry-1 Deviant or harilder, 4 rush mod file, wounded. Detail Bananas-1 aerjeasit or bewilder, 2 rash sad Ale, wounded. Slippers attached to the Eagimer Deportment-1 r a n k an d file irgauded. E.G. STANNUS, Deputy Adj..Gea. Reform of the Killed and Wounded of a detachment under the Command of Major Warren, his Majesty's 631 b regi. writ. during the operations before the Fort of Zyah, from the 18th to the litd December, 1819, both Jaye inclusive. Flank companies his Majesty's 47th regiment-1 private killed; I privates wounded. His Majesty's With regiment-1 officer, 2 privates, killed; 1 corporal, 12 privates, wounded. Pioneers -1 private wootided. Total-1 officer, 3 privates, killed; 1 corporal, 15 pri vates, wounded. Name of Officer killed. Ensign Jobu M his Majesß.tyW's 65 ARR ENlh regiment. SA VEL , Lieut. 85th Regt. Actiug Line Adj. to Detachusest. FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE. DUTCH MAIL. BRUSSELS, AUGUST 22. We learn from the French frontiers that several penions who belonged to the'ohl French army, and have been lately taken again into the service, have made use of ►editious awl injurious language in respect to the Royal Family, but they were itnnse. diately taken into custody and delivered over to the hands of justice. AUGUST 94. The late occurrences at Paris, and fluctuation in the public funds theiehy occasioned, have caused numerous courera to be sent to Holland and the Rhine, many of whom have prim e d through here. This circumstance and some temporary measures of precaution adopted at Paris, gave rise to alarm ing reports, which were, however, soon dispelled. BERLIN, ♦UGUST 19. The news of the death of the Duchess of York (a Princess of Prussia), has been rtceived here with great regret. The arrival of personewho may be supposed to have some connexion with the diplomatic negocia lions now on font, continues to be frequent. Among others are Lieutenant-General Hope, from Dres den ; Colonel Von Alinckwitx, the Saxon Ambas sador Extraordinary to the Court from Dresden ; the Privy Counsellor-Count Hittsfeld, from Pyr 'Dont ; and the British Cabinet Messenger, Daniel, from London. , OZNOA, AUGUST I. Au English frigate has arrived here which left Constantinople ou the I9th July, and brings an account of a dreadful massacre, arising from an affray between the janissaries and other troops, re• Wive to the war against Ali Packs. ANISTEGDAM, AVOUsT 25. Lewis from Constantinople, dated 26th July, rece►ved here yesterday, made no mention of the off ay between the jantesarieit and other troops ; and the article from Getios of the 1.4 instant, must be considered as false.—(Ditch Papers, Anus 26.) E ft Si tE SS. . .11 -1 4 ak.o* LONDON. • THURSDAY. Assert 31 . , 1820. The easminstion of the`witnesses was con.inued yesterday, but Iv; circumstairee hos as yet tiovspireit iu evitleiice suffie iced to raise a preamble prest.itt::- bon of the act• of i•riminality imputed to tl r QUILEN. how , / n it with what freltsigs ATTORNEY-MX ERA le and his rinplu)ers look to it3e putemeui made by the Learned Grille:nisi' et the bar of the House of Lord.. wlon they co:u. - pare it with the esidesire t h at has been brought fur ward to substantiate it ; but we can *Mae theta very sincerely that the public iii gesirral now luoJc to that statement with sentimsn s by no means favuuwble either to the Lsarned jute. grity or uoderststiding. IVliat has now becuti.e M A HON er's obscene exhibition,? Ttiry hates dwindled iuto the playful and inoffensive faitilaiigo. Where is the kissing braid by Nlaiocciit in Bra. GAM'', chausber. at the moment when the poor Chamberlain w.ss labouring under the effects of a kick from a hones and incapable of walking or e.t making any extrtion ? We presume that the Signor forgot this important particular. fir l.:a very singular memory could supply it the moment alas examination wily a recollection sat having heard whispering in the unfortunate invalid's apartment. What hoa become of the ATTORNEY-GENERAL's voluptuous tesit.seene. on board the polacrr ? GAETANO PETA;ZO, the mister of the pulacre, effectually destroyed ull the chitlins of the Learned Gentlrunut's poetic fancy, by intimating that ti... ee existed a countiunicution from the of tPe tent with the cabin tantler the lira, wbt re the PRINCESS'S suite were lud 4 eil., and that in the moniieg, when the nett Was opened, lir occ:isionally saw some of tise suite within it. The uniforM proxi 11l ity of the chambers occupied by the PRIN. CESS and her principal domestic, is not !wised ia all the instances specified ; and even in those cast where the contiguity was shewn, the singul a rity of the circumstance, as it was represented by the AT. TORNEY-GENSRAL, vanished, ei•her by a easiside. ration of the nature of the place where the Pitts. cue was lodged, or by its appearing that the spa's mews of other persons iu the suite of her Rises( flightless were no less contiguous to her chain. bee than that of her principal domestic and at tendant. The peculiar situations of apartment's with relation to each other on board a ship, where the space fur the accommodation of all, roust necessarily be very limited, ought not to be too nicely scanned, as those can sufficiently feel who the course of their lives have had the t&sfortune of being on board even of large and commodious vessels. If contiguity of resting-place on board of a ship be a crime, God forgive the thousands who annually leave this country fur the various pil lions of the globe, whither business or pleasure may chance to kid them ! When oct•arionat!y resting at Mile, the apartments of BERGS/At and of the Countess OLD!, her two principal itb~ tendante, were of course the nearest to that of their Royal Mistress. It is likely too that such apart meats were better and more commodious than others more remote, and they were naturally appro. primed to the chief dumesties. We find, hoWever, that at Trieste, the Chamber of the Countess OLDI was nest to that of the Mincers, and was between the Chamber of the Pii:scess and the chamber of BERGAIII. The misstate particulars tit wiliest the ATTORNEY-Griwelat. stooped to raise a presumption that the Princess here shared her bed with Bseaeui, prove nothing but the desperate nature of the case. To those circumstances se crustiest uisfurtunately refer as minutely as they were stated at the bar; but upon one of them we may be permitted to rentarlt, that the use of two band basins being common to all persons of cleanly habits in this country, and in Trieste also, as the witness admitted, unasked, no presumption can thence be raised of the Princess's criminality. The effect of the filthy observation made by the chamber. maid at Carlsruhe, was removed by Lord MANS. YIELD'S question to her on Tuesday, for she then admitted that the bed presented the appearance of its having been used by wily one person. These were the points ' upon which the ATTORN EY. GENERAL chiefly rested in Isis statement, and although several days have now been consan, ed in the examination of witnesses for the Bill, nut one of these averments leis as yet beeir supported by the evidence. Even the win:estate for the Bill, protected as they are from the effects of a cross•txsininatiou by the delays and einbarrie ments occasioned by diversity of languages', lies.. up to the present moment, disproved the statement t•f the ATTORNET•GESERAL- in its criminatory piss. sages; and we appeal to the common sense and good understanding of men of the world, whether . there be any one circumstance of an equivocal sta ture, not only in the statements of the witnewses, but even iii the ATTORNET•GENSILAL'S opening mooch, which is not capable of an interpretation ' . .very different from what has been affixed to it by tie Learned Gentleman, and exculpatory of the illustrious Princess named ? There is sae point in the cooducting of the case on the pelt of the Kiev's Caused which we can not forbear to notice. It ie weal in all whimsy f ~. I 111 ~ti • 1 EMil