The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1809-02-23 00:00:00

Q. Did Capt. Sanden give you to understand that the letter was foreod ?—A. Certainly. not. Q. 'Marti Capt. .4 - aittleis first chewed you the note. did you conceive it was forged. or genuine ? —A. I thought it was the Duke of York's. Q. Do you know his hand.writing ?—A. I nesse saw him write; but 1 have seen what purported to be his writing. Q. Did you desire him not to destroy the letter? —.l. Repeatedly. Q. When rot made your communication to Mr. Achim, did you-believe toe letter was its existence? —A. Curt:Holy I believed so, as Captain Satiden promised toe he would not destroy it. Q. Dol Capt. Sanden say he thought it would be hest to destroy it ?—A. NII. (4. (By Mr. %V t Lsom.) Did Captaiii Sandra ex press am: wish to destroy it?—A. He expressed nu such desire to me; bat said he had designed to dr strny it. Q. What subsequent communication hail you with Captain Sanden on this subject ?--sA. With your iwrinission I will state the particulars. After 1 had sera Mr. Attain, I made en appointment with Captain Sandell. to not Min on the same day at two o'clock, at the British Coffershimse, wher e - 1 intimated to advise him to have Ina coinmunieu bon with ;my one upon Abe business, but alie.l lie rime before the Colgesittee to reveal the whole truth. When I saw lion at the from the number of peewits present. I tlimiLfht it was not al tit place to mike any eorutituiii , :ation. I thi-...!fore asked him tit walk aids um into the city, which he agreed to. When we were neer to "Isciii ple-lbar, Cast. Sainlen said. lie feared I should semy ato.cry witia !Mu. to he laid destroyed the let ter ! ailviiica him to preserve. I afterwards saw linit on the use aaa it ig of the Ilbly 01: Winch, lie aas c tted, when he told me lie had not de sir,..• • the letter, that he would not prd's' e it, and that, as it aas his owe). he couceivril he had a right to do what he pleased a ith it. Q. ',By Lord :1111.1`11C) Dili he agsi..zo any reason slay ha we al.l not product. it ?—A. No. Q. (8 . ,/ .Ideraera Comet.) In his hist couversa tion with t nu. did he say that thi-y had for4ot Ire had this letter it his imesereion F . —A. He said los WA% not aware that they knew !le hail it to his pos. suasion. - Q. (By Mr. Touorwstr.) Did you not say that in your first conrersiiiio.l w ith Cepciin & ol d en h e promised he would nut de.triiy the letter ; that in the sec:m.lhr said he hail disittnyel it ; and in the third that ha had net ?--s.A. No. My first con venation with himat l'ivtontnutli ass griwrol ; in his second he had advised hi.n to act with truth and caution; and ou the third, he advised him Ur livaisl all coluinuukation with either Cul 11 Wardle or Mr. Lowtco. Q. Then a fortnight after he had said he had destroyed the note, ate said he hail not, which was tie day of his ettantinutioo ?—A. Exactly so. Q. When von took a ropy of the note, was it in an envelope or cover; and if so. dill you ob serve what was the direction on the cover ?- 2 -A. It o a s not ender rover, a. well its I can renteuiber. Tile direction was Fon' tiliar, Esq. I think George Farquhar, Esq. I oliset vet] that the direction did u .t appear in the sante inlaid as the inside. Q. 11 i .t in ale you' destrou., to copy the note A. I was to do so by Mr. Aglaia. Q. i lly .ur. C. W. WYNN LI 11 'hat nalsteeil yon to rive such advlce to (:opium ?—A. I t.onsittered lino as one :4.Ling athsee from a su perior officer, and I gave him such as I thought due from one qentleinatt to another. ' Q. Then nothing had been said by Captain Sadden, which raisin! a doubt in your mind as to the truth of hie assertions ?—.t. Nut in the least. Q. When did you fin* discover he had 11.1 t spok en the truth ?-1. Ou the day of Ins commit ment. Q. What did you Ao in couaepo.skr , ?-- 1. I un formed Mr. Adam. Mr. ilarro...o. cud I.owten. Q. At what thine did )oit 'sake this roion.o niration was probably shout her ..'eteek tt was at the time Mr. Adam and Nlr. I carer down to this boos*. soil I weia uh st3lts to Mr. Lowtrn. Q. (fly al►. Ananl. Are yen Tutor certain 3,1 r. Adam was pre4•ent ?—.I. No, ule m recol lection, I cannot say lie was. ( J. DA you mike that cort,roinwatiow to me? —A. I cannot pa.. I .1141. 1 iiiti mica to do• Al. It nu toy Ii 1 d . d nut I requested 31f. Ilto risen to to form you. cp. Did von cntmauuu•.rtc these particulars to 31r. Wardle r—A. No. not to my knowledge. Q. What was ;nor rra•eu lot cotoomocatiug to one party sod not to the other ?—A. Because I knew 3lr. Allem to be a num of houosse. nail I thought it any dot,. to inform Inio of what! knew. Q. (By Mr. I.l.M.torts•) 1 world wish to ask the Witnes, what was his reason for rollisog the not. ?—A. Because it was the oaly note 1 had seen ol'troe Duke of lurk's. But the ‘Vititeaa must have had some rca-nu, I should be e 1.41 ti know what it now 4. I haul no particular re.t..nt. I 'Mil as Opi UlOll 111% !WIDOW was roucerned, sin] I thought 1 could trot do better. Q. When had you theinteriiew with the Chou. cellar of the. Exchequer 1. It was lifter I had told Mr. Adam I bad area the note, and he diaes.:t ed me to call ou Perceval. Q. Did you tell Mr. Adam or Mr. Put...firm' that the note was tie.tioyed, and wheu 1 timer saw Mr. Pereeral aftcrwards ; I caa't way the game a. to Mr. .itlatu. 4 4. (Hy Mr. Mita.) Did the IVstee,s come fin se Crovelon on Suudav, tith Feb. ?--A• I wag 111 11111 1 on that day; 1 called at the Horse Q. 110 you remember having any conversation with me au that lay /—A. 1 reeullitet 1 had n kw wordy. Q. Do you remember telling Captain Sullen rut to de.troy the uute ?-21. Yes, I do. Q. ( 8., Mr. %earns.) When did you first herr the note ?—A. I think it better to state the whole of the roriveniatioi.i. Captain Sandell i•ifoirmPil rue, that on his arrival in WWII he had seen his name mentioned in the papers, and asked my advice what he should do. lie tootate In me, he had met with a gentleman, who 44%1E431 lain if he knew any owe who had money. an I was wanting protwotsos to which ha replied, he would inquire. That he afterwards met with Mr. Dusiovan, who was endeavouring to negociate eissuinissions as au army broker, who mentioned Colonel French's levy to hint, and for wlach .Soul. was paid ; thst 'spoil that occasion an commie' was muulissied, but merely that the *millennia was regular, and the channel regular. That after wards applicatio n s was made for Major Tmiyu; that Major Tony ii wanted to withdraw ens security, nail that upon that occasion lie had received the note iu question ; that afterwards a second note was produced, stating, that the promotion would go on ; and he added, Olt both these notes were in his imissession. I thick it necessary to add, that lie ..aid that intleroce was asserted to be used on that 04:101 ttttt t iu winch he was iullasaeJ on. [ Witness was then ordered us withdraw.] 1,11111 rinlihrl.,/ r• iliforined the noose, lie hail just icceised n mite from Mrs. (lark., stating she was very indisposed, and wished to be exinuined. Mrs. CLARKE was acri,rdilig:y i:4lleLl in. and examiutil by Mr. l'imck:v A Q. I iii%e yon lanuAlit with you the two sad notes you rc...:t%esl from the Duke of York, tilliCe his se parat luti trout you ?—A. I have 'fluor, fifty or more. papt.r was produced to tier, end she was asked, " D u you recollec•t re.!eiving a mite to flint effect —.l. (.tfter exi 111 l i l nog it,) 1 do nut recollect. I ought, or I might not. 1 hove locked over all on ties day, suit there ure none ouch. '!'here was one by tue Duke hitsitylf t mud mother by Mr. War the one by Mr. Greenwood the sante ? it 1, so longue. I In not revollert. It was :f snort nue from the Doke. end a long one written by Mr. Greenwood,. which the Duke copied anti ►ent in the evening. _ . Q. Who told yo - u so ?—A. The Linker qs-rvilist told mime. I waited (Loner for hills that and sent to his house, when I was info..ined iherr wits no diuuet ordered sat house. I sow hint arttraards at Isis own house. and he esti irony. Q. Did you burn the letter I tliJ many ; they were love-balers. ' Q. Repeat how long since you turned them ? A. I ens ',et certain 1 buruuJ that. until 1 kink over the letters. Q. (14 Sir C. Asu ro Did you receive any list from Capt. SALK •WMan Yea. taro or three name, ; I stark it :tit ut tae bead of toy bed—the Duke of York took it d.nv n. Q. Do you abide by that ut.im;cs• Yes ; might have had others. Q. flow lour bell you that list ?—A. The sc enuil the Duke took it dim.' ; I after. *arch; sew it with oilier proaitgionss Q. Was that list w•cri by ail other than the Duke of York?—A. 1 beliet e by the marmot who wade the bed. Q. Are :you sure the Duke of York read it A. I am. 'He drew op the curtain, and said lie nould do it by &grecs. Q. Did Mrs. Favourite see it I dou't know. Q. ( Ily the ATTORNEY-CENELAL) Did you ever live with Mr. Ogi!vie ?—.A. No ; 1 never lived with any one but the Duke 01 Vurh. Q. Did hit live with you No. Cenral Claveriug asked Mr. Ogilvie to steer my altimeter. be 1111114 itistig.otad to that by Mr. Lowiten. Q. Now lung have yen kuowu Mr. ogilvie >— A. 1 can't rt•Celtret. Q. About how long, was it xis years P—A. No. 14. You say you ui4 not kuuw him%la years ; how long a.o; it?—A. It was before I knew the Duke of York. Q. Did yon know Mr. Ogilvie before he failed ? —A. It wa, just truant that Q. Did lie owe you any thing ut the tune of failun ?—A. did not. Q. Were you eNauthied upon that occasion ? A. No. I %v.:A then living with the l/uke of York. Q. (fly Mr. WIIITAKEAtio.) Cali you produce any litter from the Duke of York since your sepa ration ?—A. I can ; they are not very eiril ones. Q. I should wish you to suladainiate thew ?—A. I I.dieve I have some b sulrstantiate the note. (4. Are they dated?---A. 1 believe they are. Q. Are they signed ?—.A. One is. Mr. ‘YNITWIWIAD ber a t eds rd that on or more of tho,e to Mr s . ke's received by her from tbo-Doka of York juice her separation, might be read-to the House as evdritee. On examination ?Idaho, however. it appeared that none of those sit her nand had bets' written stilioequeut to the rA•Parailuts she had merely brought tiieni down to the Howie, in consequesier of gisestions asked of her during her last examiuntion. She said some seals or other enntirunitiou bud bern asked her, cud she hod pkisty. Q. Look at the outside of dial raper ?—A. There iq no date to it. Q. Mr duff the first note written otter the iievi raitt,o) Thr iiitwol.• will kik w that. Q. rat in ull the letters you wish ?-- 1. I %rill put them all ie. (Sloe here handed a smaii Lautiale to the Clerk.) . _ Have you ,•'aminsd them wWI to slly they nre wll of the Duk.. of 'flak% hautl-writir..; They re. Q. Look at that note--AVas that written tarter the iirearatioti It wus. Q. llavt you any uaore i . —.t. Only sae more at home. Q. b. that note dated ?—A. No. The note was read. Directed to (7eor'.• Far quhar. " I fend you the tleu:lvy fur 4tattr journt v. I 14,‘ r au thorised no use to pkitat• ur tioulale you co my I dun t kiWW )uu mean." Q. (11, Dlr. Tttomesos). Dil the Duke of York matte lore with [military or corleviestic fain?—A. I !lenity k ore:, what you menu. Q. flave you not panted t oil rec.' ived several you called lore-letters Yes; nod any frietekt have then). Q. Was any persist' present when yon lenked over the impure relative to thi% impose). ?—A. No. Q. %Vnv any one prevent when you examinell other paper* ?—A. Yes ; hut uo ear looked over sue. Q. (By Mr. FlLoottor.) yew while von lireil in Ginner-Ater-oam poy yonr dill your h. tnekeeper Sunni II the one, curl ~ ..:oetioier the other. Q. Who was sour laonselteriwr ?-1. Mrs. Fa vorite. • Q. Did-she ever tell you your creditopi neve claniorou., or that they acrit,ell her Of Itopping their payment ?-41. Ycr ; but I did nut wind it. Q. Uul ate tvprerreot the tiece,ity of applying to the !lake of York for the pu:oirte of tupplyiug money to pay them Vt!.. ►he Q. Wa, this 011 e., Q. Were nut the sum,. r ..esitletaNe ro tarivoutcod? —A. I•dmr't know they were eutilirlerable. Was were not IllWl. so urivitticed?.....A. I don't know there aap. Q. Dma‘t pm know Ilwre Aas money to a large amount auvaticutl on aut:it It prvz.eiptaitiesi I oh) not. _ _ _ The letters delivered itt by Mrs. Clarke linen returned to her, and promised to wail to the House such 'utters as she hail a the Duke's, which were doted p o sterior to their separation. Q. (Hy Sir TIVOMA4 . 1 . 1./KTUS.) Did the Duke of York eVer in the presence of Miss Tailor talk of military promot A. I canlitn. ;Ay t he did ; he did not w hut lie witti beh,ic bar; he V% % cry rend . I* her. 14. illy Mr. Yookr..) The Witness has suit there were letters of the I of York*" in the hands of hr r friend., I desire I,:a. will state oho they toe? Lord Fouts:woes conceived he shwa date purtieularly who he meant. Mr. Voaar. said it woe but right every thing .hould be brought forward. and nothi n g kept bock. Lord FOLK LMIOK it observed the argiuseut went too far us warranting the production °revery thing for the pin-pose of sewrehing for evulence ; bot be fore any Arndt, by produced, they were hisaud to define Wind it was that all., Wanted ; and therefore he ohiected to the question? Mr. C. Auras wished to know. wee she to be allowed to hand over papers, and then refuse to produce them. Mr. I'alt4:VVAt. conceived such random examina tion only tenile.l to delay, inultipbing a uselksts moss of evideoce. pervien was then vrithilrown, snJ him Clarke aaA told sloe might illep.irt. (Cokietii !lAA ILTON recalled.) Q. (hg Lord I: oLkirro SE.) Dia Captain San dell ' , tote to you that lie ever receive:l au) tolKi of tiiiiney from Major Touyn No. Q. Via he plate to you troll) whom tie received the note !--A. To the Led at my reco:Leiieo, he stated that he had received the not•• from 31r.... C►nrkv, o► that it had beau curve; et) to kilo from hire. Clarke. Q. Was that note wrapped up in a piece of pa. pre, eke accompanied by • piece of paper, itli similar direction *pow It 1 do nut recollect w:ietharr it was wrapped up in a piece: of paper or not, but Captain . S•ondeu bhenril u part of ktter, with Ow Doerr port-inark upon it, mod dewed we to feo3ll/VCIC rstnilaiitr of the, two letters. Q. It'heu you web. informed that that note vs* destroyed, are you ctstain whether or nut you se yueinu d Mr. Adam ?—A. I can only reireitt the answer I hare alre..tly gi.en to• that qiieutioia. At lir.: lay mind wits that 1 bail iliforrned .Ir. Adam ' • but I now tliiiik I loot talked to ethers s Ito men Mee informer) him., Q. Vir.yo did you inform ,}lll•Herri:ou I knew that Mr. Ilarrison wets employ cd a. Aw.tit for His }Loral Nishiume hi this bus Mess, by stem; him to ettendaaceuri this House. Q. Of whom did you learn that Mr. Harrison was ratiotoyed upon this matter us Arid fur the Duke of York ?—A. From Wl' pli - rtirtahlt penmen: but it was imprwrible to br Ale the room. and MA observe that Mr. I iarrieriii was esuployed. i you observe that Mr.Lowteu wasetn piny rd —A. les I did. from olisErving.what passel dia the reran where Nit.. Loaten was. •, . • Q. Were you referred to any one to apply to• Mr. beaten :—A. 1 rreeirtil wiener from Cul. t;ordoit infonnilig me that } ehollld.attend at OM; Noose. uud that I was to cell-Via - Pdr. Louisa. ' i‘orn I should Ilaii by ineikiug inquiry here. Q. Did C,.pt. Sondra, when he *hewed you the pu l ler with the Ihover pod-mirk miens it. gate bow 11. e log:, arid that paper came into :Us liumessirm t A. I do lint recollect that Ire ihd, but Ire skewed rue th-ns merely to impress my mind that they came from the same person. Q. How long hove vim been acquainted with Captain Sande', ?—A. I have know.' hieia si ova the Year 1793, hot Ire has oat been known to me as my •uclumititenee; it was merely by leis being iu the army. 114.• (By Mr. &SAW Ler[olloo6.) Did Captain Santlea chew tiny rtinetanco in alloying you to take a ropy of the note I—A. No.ne whatever: Q. (By Mr. BATsuan.) 1)0 Captain Sun den chew you the ether note to which he had re re:red in one of your former couversationa with hits I—A. In Isrodueing the note in question, I recalled tolls recollection, that he had said hi our (oilver.tation at Porthinosith there were two notes. on which he replied that lie must have been mis taken. or if slot s that lie must have given the collar to Alojor Touyu, iu mike' to convince him that the business was to go on. Q. Did Captain themlen state what the con tents of that note erre, or by whom it ass written i• —,t. He stated thin it was to coutinee Major Tonyn that the pr iiiii ution would take plare, lint he never stutvd to me lay whom they were wrett.n. Q. Wily them Ilid Curtain Sstmlen ele.ire con to compare the note with the other letter It oi finly to convince in.. that the note soil the letter ware %%num' by the same person. Il e its sign' d ran other reason. 9. (By Lord MircoN.) Have you not stated, tlest tuts note was known by you to be relative to the hopoiry now ;oilier uo ?—.4. 1 !urea/ready btu t ea, t..at upon eyeing it I declared I bulievesi it to be the hood-writing of hi. Royal flightless, and therefore it wits istspossilsie but I should attach rent importance to it. Q. After you communicated with the Clieneelkr of the Ezehequer, did con know he did initial to produce this rate to the Ilonae for some clay. : A. I had no knowledge whatever es to the intentions of the Chaticellor of the Exclitspier, npou this subject. Q. (By Mr. THOMPIION). Drs you know whet new ehannell of rrottw.tiow Capt. Soggiest milliard to atom lie said, thot -.hook toe usual chassnii. .nether was tyro to him, but at ow stitlititemi expense ?-4. I b,lieve that 111,011 reference to the tontine., nothing of that c art wail appro.. In s cumequcher of Mi.. elotka . ' ti- s:stling, after cost.iglerable bums of notary hod I b e en &yen, other eloinnell were talked of, but se mentioned. Q. (By Air. IncKii.titr.) Did Captain &paw ever mesilimi to )u.t tiny 111 Juve for Inv euilduet A, \u, he never did. Q. Did lie ever mention that the emscealrnent ei th e ho l e could lip a Isisessefit is any person, or that its production would prose prejositesal to on rid ua ?—A. Cuss 110 t Mr. H ISHISON. Q. (By lord Fut.►.To►l.) Are yoll'Aient or Coommal to the Duke of York in this bunnies,' :-- A. Certainly not Aeriitoror can I culltuyself CounseL If. Are you employed by th.t Duke of York in any way in this kusinels ?-7A. 1 was dea'strl iu the early stage of it td moist iu tidy may 1 either by advice. or otherwise ; but I thd net uodt rstead that I star employed iu the capacity of couia.el, nor that airy euuuarl could appear fur the IJuke of York. lam orcasioually consulted upon inilitsry affairs by the IVar ()Jive, Ulld tire Barrack I{lke, in eousetiatiice of a know - W.l2e I our thouvia possess upou wilitury , slit/jerks of ii al 0u5i0...: titm. Q. When did Colonel Hamilton itifortai thin the note, j,urport►ng to b written by the Hoke of York, said to have beets dvetrme, , it Ili cot de stroyed It was towards four or tat,• o'clock the evening of the day Captain Sand. is was called to the Bar* I met Colonel Hamilton in /Parlia ment-street, when I war walking in emniminy with the Solicitor-Cencral. Colonel Unions:oil then took• rue made, and told sue he had heurd that morning the note was not destroyed, but still ►n r.l.stenqP. • LW you tnl::e ant• steps in ennsegnet►ce of that information —A. I very shortly afterwards came down to.the House, whin I believe the Com. 'Mitre Um ►ittiut;, and I informed Mr. Huskiuson of the information 1 had just then received. Qi Was you in the House, during the proceid- Mg. of that slight after giving such inwrisa Awn A. l• rms. Q. Wall this piece of information so Oren by you previous to the statement made by the Chd,l evlior of the Exchequer?-4. It war, certainly. MR. 1117sKisSON. 9. (By Lord FOULEST° N E,) Did you receive in. fornnition at to the note riot being destroyed from Mr. Harrison. and when ?—A. I did receive it from that Gentleman a very short time before my Right Mon. Friend (Mr. Perceval) rose to mak. , his stateaseut of what he had heard from Colonel Ilrmiltdd 111,:w the sub . ' ‘• t of the note. Q. Did yon inform the .Chancellor of the Ex cheytter, of, what you had heard from Mr. Harri son t—A. 1 did inform him of what Mr. Harrisou had stated, as to hill iseitig told by Col. t'htt the note was nut destroyed. and added that he 1 / 4 011111 be able to snake the di;cuvery• of the truth of dn.,. during the course of the examitiatioa of Capt. Sintlen. MR. PERCEVAL. Q. (By I.oreli : t;i:kiitrioni.) I wiser to know from the Hight Hon. tientlemin, H Lether be wishes to filter ally part of Lis evidence ■m not :mate of aws part that it is necessary for ine to atftr. Q. 11 hen you wade your statement to the House, hwl you heard that the note questite. hail hero ilestreyed When I made the state merit to the Committee, I had heard ■ud received the information winch hos been mentioned, and f stntad that I by no isie:insituew whether the uut was destroyed or nit. That statement 1 certainly did make, in xonse4ltenceof the information I had but se ently received foe. excepting that inform:l.- non, it laid been strongly imp:lased ou my mind that the tame wasdrotmved. • Q. L Irish to know who were the persons to wham Feu gime 'information as to this . note'—A. 1 vim etii4 mineral of tiwui ; the Sulicitor.Grorral, the Attoiney-Gailerai, Lord Custkroigh, Mr. Cunning, and Mi. Yorke. I eta pretty confident that I mentioned it to other. I woottoooti it likewise to the Lord Cremes:lbw, Earl of Liverpool, stud alas to Mr. Admit, to ahem I stated my opinion, that lie communicate it to some of Isla friends on the other %id.% I Istkove I mentioned it also to Mr. Lowten. To every ow of those gentlemen, ahead names) have ineutiossed. I did state at the same time my that, trots the dist nionietit I had heard of the exiAtcnee of this note, 1 felt it lie eleiuly my duty not tube the depositary of sash a secret. I harmed that opinion upon the lint day that the circumstance of its existence was commu nicated to me, mod as soon as I did hear that it ass destroyed, (which was the aezt day) seaanicated it to my Learned friend Mr. Adam. awl the lord Chancellor. When I had reason to believe that it was destroyed I determined to cous in **** irate the feet, in order thin it might nut he ex tructed solely by evidence ut the bar. to the cuui,e or the examination of Captain Sande'', 1 had iw my mind during the whole tune the various polo.. or fact which the Witness had communicated to 0,4.1,0 Hamilton, if the Witness had not at last confessed that the note was not destroyed, I should unquestionably have asked him wile:her he had lint ceminiiiiicated to Colonel Ilautiltou thin very mumnun that it was not destroyed. Me. lkiintsvox corroborated the frets stated by the la-t Witness, mud added, that %%heti he made the communication to him, lie di I not tic, so iambir the impression that it would ma t‘e any dif ference to the transiietiiei, as previonaly Commoni cateol In (:01. lielltilit01:. ..... 801.11:11011.1 . iLNKRAL also confirmvd tin testimony of Air. Perverts,. He stattil, that whim the c 'cation n made to Lou, he did not di•wover in his !tight lion. Friend Huy purpose hot one, w as a determined resolution, that the fact be pithltely known. He perfectly wt.ll re membered him ra 3 ing, tit was due to his own h 0... nom. ie. well us to juqice, to ascertain milauther that dounnient was real or a forgery. Mr. C 411 IS I N ;lm) cantinaea th. above state• meat. MR. ADAM. (4 7 By I:ord FOLIMSTON6.) Did you receive any usfursa.ition from Col. Hunailtunoliat this note :;11 s irolu smt h dret ioh rn h Y u t.d t I?:fnA:f 1 v doubtful ul v 4 thrt d is i .- d r li r re r i. e r '. iTed ". .tech informati iiii from Ali-. Ilarrioui or Mr. Hits. LliPsoll. It WM much about the atone time when Mr. Illokpowm het...ne acquainted with that in formation, that I al.o bessuae acquaint, .1 with it. maY isiso ater:Jo adtlaiun to what ha, iIeCII anA Mr. Percecal, that out only did he dcttraulue to coursounicot o sill dolt had pawn! ou thio subject, 1