The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-11-14 00:00:00

„......4. 3 ) • TelM? • ' , 0 .4 1... ... , 4z 4 e. ; -- .. . '. I t: 4 e niscEgy dy- LEI'S Ftr,vEluL. solemn and iNreki , ...; eereasony commenced ht tit ebht o'clock, end was not cepe c t o l i n ;le tired Iret,:rec. twelve end one this The order o.i proceistoa,ais it, the priuci i.v4 compo.logit.e ittitioutterti last week. ,t 1 it tuts entiti.:teil It* 4 privets fishers), yet o f perverts who ettendrd wets very great. r and nli its sociuily love been crowded tbr.e two ( Intl with bloaters of the must doserilitiow. thy all tho Minister, let town to attend offal or the Princess ANIMA. state C . lir .1 the Pt tueeas AY{Lt• was lined ,te oacio. _ t h e wl;ol+ t,f reatetiay. the ahem' and Wln•lror atiJ Eton were shut as close as Sunday. ,„" in wide% Otte reottios of her R o y a l Pirtner+e wee covered with s t . (;.urges Chapel. where the eeremowy we, w . s o ho coveted with the nude. St. JA.SIi.S'S OALACk. alliance of inquirers 'venerates diiie, to ta nte love, of !Phi r...wt's health. All !so resort 14 the Palace appose extremely fa his wet lire. following were among the uumeromi iu. who Ipri their 1111111 v .t btitits %WOW Lady Hmtzersiona Mr. VillitY Mr Bramwell • • "Worcester Mat(ini. du l 31areSiotala of Blaudfurci Sir C. Price Mr. Eden Caiitaiu C. Edmutssioa• Mr. K. Williams Avis uf Stafford Mr. Ileneace .Cuksiaa Mr. W. Ellis Mr. B. B. Acworth Mr. Serjrant ()taloa Cameral I)elsnery a a Londtigi Lord Elleraturough Jaa Plower °corral Ogilvie Bambara Sir W. BeilMaham %limns sod lonians. Ca:sitstn W it ulacll et Heat.' Clyt.tin rotklorr Sir F. Baker Sir T. June' Dr. Muds C I. Mr. Haanuatd ~urntuu liming -4 aireb cll Dakimplo The Attorney-Getter/II Swart Cash M. p. m,. Cory th,,,,,,.....t NI .1 Weed Mr Spjvaitt Co. buill i ?mg Mr Justice 11.4 th ik i rriafk Mr. Banta Gratisin &Amen Mr Berm Mn d Lesitary Mr flfacusosars (...,, plisse Mr. Greevs Ile The Consul General of the nets Pam Two Sic' WA 11 Dr. tree Carlvtoe Colonel A. toss Gordon Earl of Mascarene raii..to Anitiarsidoe The Bishop of Load's 'Arad-sac Front Lady F Compton ‘WaY Mr. EVetattl Haas ` Proid Dr. Posen 5.,,,ri Dr. Pemberton ssa Hairiest Ape. Air /oh *Ogee Monsieur Comte D'Arteif Petry Mr. Heaviside ~.. Timms key Dr. Carey +` , e we Mr. FIVENISD Hestheote fowl, Sir James Peltatcy 114k7 Dr. Fotbsmill .ie Goateral Macleod . Lard Illadstrak Laity Cruitut, , kriessek Ittijor Stratton COWS! 4 Me Sas grant ' &bay ll'Leal Lads 3. Tly . rnue ""Le.4l D r Y earsoo 111.1.e..4 Mr. Serjrnist Riana:nghis Denier Lord Ruhvrt Fitszersld I C Smith Mr. Strjeant Clayton ..rue Markham Sir Johe Alaepberost blur Mr. R. C. Plowdeo Tiptoe Mr. Kiel; '.•sktt Mr. gad Mrs. lin:lett la of Mehemet Dowager Lady Grantham a! themes the Doti Dowager Co:lotto of fLoaslya mariner lard Crewe I Led Balkans Earl of A ltabory !oilf Geuetal Bruton oiy Demist Sir S. Cottrell key 'he Man of Winchester rrys Sir James Cantp!ocll Sir .1 end LaJy T. Cra.kreit Mr. Swarth Mr. Wharton Colonel Roberts Lord Napier Mr. F. Swim tad Monchollo ire sae The Chief J nsi.eo of Chanter CANIMitI4 Of Us:VC I I. y d %L.! 184Ittr Lady 8 Perry patois Mr. Rate Atli .1 II Counterre fatreouberg Prsorzess Castel. MM. Walpole Dr. Fisher .• H Walrn,le Colonel Narrate i s .44 Lady Trialt Mr S. IVeylait4 Crafter Mr: Talbert e. 4.lyerey General Mr. Ingram I Lady Curable Lady ue Creepigay rt.! Mr. (I Dallas nui sm Mr. Wilke 3 1.u4tet Lady Wettingtorr Lord *nil I ndy GlP:thereat ti Euut of de.bnrult.ito Mire I blethers Lady Sailstorlt Mon t Fir!. Lady. and Mira Nichol! Clial utne Caesuras Dowager at Seliou C 4 0( 1 / 1 inll )laetbia. Coratror of Malone Alt. Polley Mr. 8. Borne Alatchroure. of Stafford Sir Starts !that Coont.s• of Itoubt try Ludy Punsautty Lady Paget ip a Loot C. and Lady Ile UUea k Mr 11.0.1auou , tea ye *ritual Lard Sir W. Sotylb ' l4 / 1 4 hq , if closer- bake th Drrri Mr C. Steqtb Mr Earth. y 44 4 r :tan Hon. .1 Dunzlm I elemeriroarr Dike nf Qweensberry 414 heater RAM Mau* a.w'4 LW" VeeiLay theerepoor ibny R IlareLry 144 1 9 Yareere I. .rd sad Lady Pembroke 1 -ael %ikon A. A nom leyeteee De. )liana Eliot nikett Pater l'euniugtea Inkde Mn gt . biro RC R. [W[! CURT OE JUI)ICATURE.--DinszA,N6r.9. av GUT HO% ISLIZ• OgIIALII AKA, DIMON Gill •I•ctNcunitr. Arrr.t.LAlrr—THs 'wart non. VACENTIN L. BROWN E t LOUD MAROS GLONCUItitY, 11011rONDL NT. Joulgra • _ _ Sir W. Ihrtva. Bart., Mr. Justice Oasestot, Mr. Justice I'Leradat.rt, Lu's Asp Warrant and TitiratAi 1.7a.4.11, Tow canoe eras brought by the Appellant, open u 4 , mbie,anpcol--Tout from au :ilk zed grirva ',Le; mot usinthei from the tine] ' , entente of the Cuuatl arm] Can. t of the Litutese of Duhlia, %%loch adjudged the lirspumlent entitled to a divurre and .euarn tion from Appellant (on account of the clear and eqahhahed adultery of Appellee!) front bed and board. The Libel in this cause wits exhibited by the Re spondent on the day of June 1808, and cue. laths the following facts • tt stated the marriage of the Respondent and Appellant, according to law, in the year 1809— their and the issue of their marriage —the uniform guotl and exemplary etilidnet of the Appellant, until their Prrival 111 this Itairgrlym— stud subsequent intrualliction of Sir John Liennet Piers to Appellant, in Lute year 1804—the manner and time of use introduction. .—.iid a criminal act of adultery commitied by Ap t .. Vont OM the Bth day of A prl. at l a ymis, the residenee e; Respondent, and In the absence of Appellant'' arriv a l and stay in Dublin, timing the mouths of April and May—the tier:neat visits of Sir John Piers to Appellant, duria.: the occasional and un k ernJable olisente Of Rer;ionilein —A linen,. nt'a eon -61104 eorrespondmt c, by letters and notes, with Sir John Bennet Piers, and i .mediate visits to her in CUl:ltMtpelr.:(! of ouch letters said note., during the absence of Respundent—Sir John 11. Pions 'nitric constantly iu private with kiordlaut, and fur Several boars at a time. in the draaing. room. with the doors close and bolted, and the positive larders of Appellant nut to admit coin- PtioV-Appetlant and !lir John Piers tieing sur priced in the drawing-molt in a most indecent situation. and other !ear and tr.toset tuslsoce4 of her guilt—the frequent disorder of her drew —c o ntinued acts of the must indecent l,berties taken by Sir Jilin Piers, land permitted ny Appenat—her great and visible grief at leasing Dublin for Lyle., and parting with Sir John h. pi. rs-a Sir John 11. Piers's orhaeg went visit at Lyons relos..l to yelik it t!li IteMpOlM:ent and his company. and i.nirlerhan ly U rea . omen by wailting e Sir John B. Piers in a retired part of the datuesoe, sad hanging on in s arts is a mad familiar 111.1111 MT, the first cause of Respondent's suspicion—Resirotitlent's earliest eonunnoication with Appellant MD the sob jee!, si.d her immediate, free, and roluotery eon f. of her crime—Appellant's tietirm to the Respondent of the picture of Sir John B. Pier!, a locket set with his heir, the litters of Sir John B. Piers, and other dear proofs of her crime -..Appellant's removal to Shelled, and her conti nued ocknowledgm• fit of her crime, freely and volont:tree mentioned and confessed. and in its con , equ.i.ee. severely lamented in Appellant's let. tors, written from thence to Respondent, and to other friends of Respondent and of Appeilatit. . . . tune being joined on this plreding, sod no excep tion taken thereto. Respondent proceeded to the examination of witnesses, and other evideuces, in support of his libel, and proceeded therein nrerly to a dom.. when the Appellant. on the Oth day of June iso9, exhiblted a pleading in this cane, called a matter contrary and defroster. • In this plea lug Aunthaat ieleged. that Re. spondent had heron perfectly aup-4-4, and coma. ba" of profligate conduct of Su John B. sod particularly with respect to married frOilleti. be fore his introductiou to the Appellant ; and that with such knowledge of his character, he had in troduced him to Appellant...and iodirectly at tempted to refute the charges of her crime, as al leged, and afterwards proved by Respondent ; and sought to do away the effect of her crime and her confession, by an allegation that it had been ob. Word by • promise of forgiveness, and that her crime had been forgiven , by roma f Respondent's having permitted her to remain at his house until about the 13th day °limit, when she went turbos do,,, under the care of Col. I/Ad ; and ma allega tion of the Respondent having had a connection with her, subsequent to his knowledge and her confession of her crime. The personal answer of Respondent was required to this pleading. In this an.wer, Respondent. on his oath, denied the truth of the allegations of this pleading, and swore that Apo-Danes confession of her crime was free, full, slat voluntary. A second pleading was eghilnted on the part of the Appellant, on the 24th day of November 1009, of nearly the same import of the first pie/Ming; and on ktrrpoodeist's personll onaser Leirs4 re quired thereto, it was immediately mid fully au. suered. The Appellant produced ar.4l examined some witit.s.rs to certain articles of her pleadings, but in no wise to the roof or establistimo,it of her 4,. restaive matter. or any thing connected therewith or (siding thereto; and publii anon having in the cause. the Manse Cann en to be htard the iith dAy of Alay last. On the neat Court dny an appeal on writing front the allevrd grievance was exh,hitail an th.: part of the Appellant; and the Judge, in the Court below, It.vitur required the Appellant to pro ceed t. the ClllOll and on her defe..re the Appel lent drained statiii4 her case, as f , ondrd on ill,. Ik within of the plcadiaga or evidences produce , to sane, or any other grouud of defence. as spinal the co.e *toted soil established in evidence on the part of the itespoodent; end Overtop** the Jiolge plOllO Mileell his sentence in t hi. cause, in 1 4 . nor of Respond...it. and adjudged him ra titled to II sentence of Divorce m u d se.porstio, from ►p;:ellaat, on account of the clear owl esrairloshed adultery of Apnellont, from bed en.l board. until they are rec..nc•led. The All hl.i-latop of Doilhot prevo,sty troorentsJ ti. ; an d s,,,f t . the Respondent's eroetor. hatiog esbibitott iJte o:n.tl bond. with ti.e sirprotneion nod coast to PPIP seuteore •. ceettiogly, .ot the of Ni.y la.t—the Appellant protesting at ,e art, mud avilesling fro= the weutiate. L-. 111( !N`Tl+I.L IG ViCE: COURT O! ItINGN 1J CM, !Off. It . , Wit FIS4/ICI4 11111/liilNiTlr COLE/1149a • Mr. Sim/vent aHcM b skewed c aus e a g ai as s . the Rule otonin•ri Mkt to Attornet•-Cieneral for past pon'ing the 'hid of the issue in this cam*. 'The rule applied equally to the rioted Su Preneit Bur dett iht:olemen. and also that easiest Lord Moire. The latter of these he should sittn4e to first, as it would save their Larilybius trouftic. The,grotind of that tuthim he septelrended, was the same ea that ',gotten Coleman); hot at the same time there was oleo a totally ecpareve and &ohm , ground. In the case 9f Lord &Wm, the applica.ion had been made upon an affidavit ssiatinia. that Mr, Chlernan, the D:lensirtit in the other action, was a necessary and material wither*, cud that he is absent bi Pot.. tagml, upon the service of his country; be, there fore, should agree, that in a rause an Mips - insult as tin. one. where the Defendant's Attorney Stated that a aetoerr,s wa r threat. it would tint ts-come the Plrititiff to thing on the trial it the aliseoce of that witness. Although the same facts 'night perhaps be proved by other witnessises t ,et the Plainti ff was nut entitled to say that the Defendant shodld be deprived of thin oitnen upon whom be portico ler ly rattled ; and upon that ground he should not shear cense against the rule, but shoal agree to it. being made ebsolute. The tape of r. Coleman. however, stood upon no such gronint. The founds tMst of the motion, he apprehended, Must be upon the connection wherh wiserupposed to exist between the two cruse.., Now the Ptsint:ff lied already state 1 the history of these two causes, and hid pleaded within the common and ordinary rolee'of toe Court during last term,•when he flied a de murrer in the Speaket's.cate ; but he saw no lessee for postpo n ing the trial hi the other action agonise Coleman, %Men there was so default open the pan of the Plidatiff. There had been no delay in either of the reset, as their Lordships had laid dtiwn cer taut rules of practice with whirl, the parties are hound to comply, and the plaintitf had strictly complied with the peri-xls allotted fur the isurpoliet of justice. if, then. the Plaintiff had not infringed the Rules of Court, why should he antleipute the arguments upon the Dethurrer in one of these eases, before the time when the Court had eft it down 6e atriment ? His not pent-ee9eg in one • action csatild he so reason rot csmetraining him in the other, before the common and ordinary time 'dinned • by sh e Court in such cases. It was true that the gee*. hone that would arise upon the retard in these causes, must necessarily appear in some teepee's the some ; but yet there were points totally separate and distinct. Some of the questions that would *rite upon the Ina! of Coleman's case. upou which issue was joined upon replication. and which would be to be tried before their Lord sl.ips and a Jury. very materially differed from the other; but it was also true, that according to the event which might happen upon tile trial of one of these actions, the others 'night depend 7 fir instance. in the action of Sir freshets Burdett against Coleman, the same arguments might arise Gem the case against Mr. Abbott; as it certainly raised the question as to the privileges of the House of C0mm..,,, the Validity of the Speaker's War rant, and as to that which had hero done tea cer tain extent in consequence ..r that Warrant. One of the pleadings in the action ordain Mr. Abbott did adunt,dliat the dime-of dinr•Pliuntifrs home being brelt• n open isms the consequence of the Speak r'a tt'Arrent ; but supposing the warrant to be legal, and the privileges of the House to be Whit they weer said to be, it remained still to he argued, whether dr nit there was I cause for breaking the doot ; and the question would be, how far Mr Abbnit skull be responsible for the acts ms of Mr. Coleus in ; sad it was raised in con err:acne, of the ins:ificesion ptit upon record upon that plea. If the verdict should be for the De r-ottani, he should apply to their Lordships for a Huh- in Mew Cause why the judgment should not be .11 .-red for the Plaintiff. notwithstanding the verdict so given. Under these circumstances he could not see why it should not be deemed neces sary tsi postpone the trial of the issue till after argument Open the demurrer. Supposing, that in cornea:lence of the trial of soother question having been brought before their lordships upon * writ of error. se where the same questiou of law was pend ing in another Court. their I.ordahipe might very properly postpone either their judgment or the ar guments of Counsel. till the other tribunal had de cided the treatiou before them. Hs appreheuded that that Court might be justified in delaying fur ther proceedings. till the Court of !Nei trigger. or the Hoene. had decided upon that other writ of error; but that was not the case here. The apinication to their Lordships has been nothing more or less than desiring their Lordships to pestpcnie the trial of this question till they had decided the same quer bon upon the trial of another cense. He could not see the slightest te . A.ote why the Attorney- General should thus desire to have the benefit of their own jusli. : in-nt in the trial against Mr. Abbott, in order to deride the same question In the cruse of SO Francis Burdett against Coleman ; for cup. posing the trial at liar faint. on at the time aced, and the verdict for the Plaintiff as far as fetal,* to Sir Francis Burdett and Coleman, the trial. he ap rehended, would be at ir-st ; if the verdict vs. ror die Defendant, the qitestion would not he at rest, as it might lie raised stain by a motion to enter a verdict far the Pl•isitiff. 'lucre would he suit the 'sine questions depending to the is u causes tai hr .r e tard aii.l decided by their Lordships ; and for what reason should the Dslesolaist i 3 —6* No, di, not hike the usual music of trial, hot let me have the ques.inn as to Mr. Abbott tioissed tiro. esthete &lien that us to Colemal ?" The 1'1,1'04 had un doubte di; a r.ght to marshes' the proles - dings. st. far ati the rules of the Court a mild let him; and therefore. um lets their Lordships mull percints some iodate of justice to the proem...lines. the pracice of the Coon gave the (limpid a rs t Oit to teri;ore hi. own actio.ts. Wh.tltrr the eporatnm were to be decided by the Court bets re the Trirl by. Jury, would make no differs:ver al, ll' easiii. for is either (see the decisioos wuu;'t br isqu.l4 solemn, and the couscquencess Were ibis presets' question to be 'in-cussed Ly a motion to eider a vrrdi, t ter Ili:: Plosistif, 4 w of error vls•uld Noally Is+ in dint instance, as well in else 04.6 " , agai n st Mr. Abbott. 0 ....ae1d be equally the auhjett 01 etteetaiustlyt: or • writ it: V error, mid therefor:l :here rout lie no reason Ili , Plaintiff %hi. .iii Sr, deprived ut tvc right of setting down fur (oat the cause Col, mast, before t h at •ganst 31r. A; hots. lit cswq forever, ahem tixre waiilsi lie. a Isoore of fus tier, Gad forbid that their Lorit,sops hat here the power of iiitr- , uptiii/ more pro tect/logs. as the rules nut • practice . of the Court for the etlrantiige of obta.rtine je..tice for all 'unties; hut •no adiaiiinges nor ditadvamsges in the „mils ut iosta. c: to induce their Lord.hips to N ay that use d-n.urrer in Mr. A1,1,011.'16 cc.. should br argued before the trial of Coleman's case ; there might be cease a here there ini g nt be a dranurier upon a itt.llit NM,. sad also • fact to be established, in which the P.antiff might, if he chose, set deau the tri4 of ibr tact hature the demurrer ceina.te beargued ; arid there might also he'cure of an opposite nature, to which the que,- Cities likely to arise. might hr more intimately con nected ; but that %twilit not apply •in Out present case, because here the causes wel'e totally &Olivet. • Mr. Justice La i 31.4, :c here inquired if the Learned Serieant meant to recover dimages for the whole injury, supposing the warrant to he ilk.. gal, or only for time alleged excess cominitted Mr. Serjeaut Sueinitan answered, that if the party were found gUilty or the civets, it would still be io the choice of the Plaintiff whether he would rest satisfied with limners merely for that excess; betathat arould not eutttlie the Defoudent to my that the muse should be eeayed, as the rules rod Oriente of the court et.'itled him to this trial; and theti Win thi'Mason eleven that it shobld be postponed to seseer the cause of jo nice. The Partin* . shrub' have a right to consider whether he cho.e to go on with his case against Mr.Abtro.a. even after he had obtained atreedict ie the Case against Coleman. He Might, perhaps, be 'wieder{ aftei obtaining a derision in Coleman 't case • but •yet sotto(?) , hart • right to ask him the got:etibn whether he would still -go on against Abbott. if privately asked, he should answer that he did mean to goon with it; but at the dime time uothilip was to be inferred from his not answering the question. If the guesteou of leo and of fact more opon the sole record, the case might be others/is:L. ; bin bow did it at all apply in the present case, where there were he distiact and separate queetions. altisengh they atom out of the same circinn. wares ? lin therefore submitted to then Lord ships. that, - unless the Aitorney-Genersel could slaw some cogent reasons for breaking in upon the taloa and practice of its* Court, :he Plain tiff had a nein to sissy he tied bteu guilty of no de fault nor deny, hut had acted cons-stently with the rules of justice, end therefore intatit mike ifis election as to which of the comers he Otould try firth The necessary coneequence of putting off tilts trial would be, that it timid not he tned at all during deo Term, but most be postponed in the next Term, or to gaoler Term. 'l'%e •Plalutiff bed prepared hammers in a certain cootie which the law had marked not to hint', end ilseeefere he had aright to say. lido net deprive me. of the right of trying that canoe whirls I son prepared to.try in all its points, by making me try another, which I not prepared to try in the mime way." Setting down this Demurrer for %Virility or Tuesday is no answer to tine application, for the conse q uence would necessarily he the pristporsesneut of th e trial ut this odic! question to treat Term, or till Enter Term. Mat evitemitted, that the Drfetirlant wishing to ;agile the Demurrer first, was no reason for their Lontehips* altering the common course of proves iliac, and therefore that this role must be ths. charged. . The Arrnanalt-GRllltaaL, in answer, seated, that he appeared in support of the Rule lie had ob tained ; and it now become his duty to eniortrivert upon the statement which his Learned Friend Mel made of the groaods upon winch he resisted it. Ile was glad to hear it admitted, that the Defend ant had been guilty of no delay; so far from it. in. deed, lie had not even availed himself of those op port ~,, ides of procrastination which every Def al'. out hail a right to do. Neither had the Plaintiff been guilty of any delay, such as he had any right complaiti of. Ile dui not desire thud' Lordani pa td impede his (the Plaintiff's) proceedings, nor tit advance his (the At ~.ney-tietieraPs) ; but he booms bly requested their Lordships so to arrange *hi proceedings as not to he prejudicial to the Plain tiff nor to the Defendant, by merely admitting of such delay as was necessary. Tim Learned N.J. jeant hail said, that it was a proceeding which would produce neither tuiviiiitage nor disadvaotage ru htui. nod it Was upon !List saying that he (the Atnerisey.Cernierall renal, for it' lie could .he that what lie desired was ulna conveni e nt for the old. mate mini/mt:dor joetwe in the proceerdiugs berm c the Court. for cleaning the puirste id the awe, and Ittistalog the matter se is preemie gantlet); theirs would De tutfis lent mamas (heed's them tugs by the trollied Serirwsst) for there Lowish:re greeting whet he raked. he might, however, rainy the ar. : utneist *sill • further, and soy, that it was ass rationing, to tio.stis parties, for each thought. Nowell in the right, and it was study the object of each to bung the matter before the Court in the moot perspicuous way for decision. arm catch WOUNI notice the benefit of tatting it su biVagilr, It apoeared from the terms of the ester; that the Plaintid went only for the exteme but Lr had a tossrive se Saw, though not tu word.; for he might say the whole of the jurddlcotion is bad in Whilst the Learned Sett-art was proreeditig lewdly in substance. In forme has seer-cried the litre *loch tlw law had pwintr,l out. Could it be said that he was lint reo:itlid to a iffLrent moose,. of il•iiiageo s.. Sliest two case* The whok proceed thug u.e. either illegal. or it WAS oOly as rave.* to the 1110.4 Or 4101144. d. inlet Nrr)'tug the warrant rant:) caesium,. "he Plantar stainer{ to lune this its bete. that whilst he 'engin only to race•ier fur the excess. he atilt had heinnil,han Ibis reser - varion; if the Jury found that the- - Deftintsat• had out been guilty of is omen, tees the Keiw.ite would have recnorse to the plea that the whine sit the jusnfiersiern was had, and tent that the wee still entitled to damages. Or tire l'iaintif might find honselt is the situation. n a mely. abut alciuugli It were fund th a t the Dekvaiggi i ts thr cow hurl been guilty of en recess, yet if the Conn q u it. va t out hearieg the demurrer. that Cie inserting/rim was bed. then tie egoist tome' again en d e t e m greeter domains Seers was the state of. case:hens earl socertaiety ia %Lich his Ls arseett i,t cv, TII E pal, onltlgg 'gist fit c le poN . .4 parti. 4 i: 701.001 it g -41 0,, • ,:r awl ohm tbcgc • • Opens' tr y...is .t, thr (w toN e y al 01 4:, Tt.r ottte c , ut,tc 1..., IN Wn • WO Sow t: , The mm ▪ HighorSi r i ll 1 . 1:14 R. ;it. hie k plater Si The wort] errata Its g rr!sn • usiour The folio' optteri. •liri I lid Chide:BSl Tie Hur. Mr. Brief et I tti .'r. Di titeS ai beg )fir P Therein 1r R VLunitu Lord &folk F las pis el Ms S. C9ltisi . Spew ▪ lir ()mitt Magma Mad rr Irreurria • Mt anr:se led lagetty liege'. t toed IWO J Coltber Earl id its.in ASiveral Gary* aniLCl • . Sem Ssr 11 Saari Cu r 11 Corgi .1 Mew S' mbar Yowl rt 1 0 1 1 thoryeigt 110 Bs.‘vell Ip iris( Lyra..., tioril C.,r pbse 111 VYbu•n.r O fi , erilki Pi i . t Carktc Gucilion 1r SYLir.. WI A s j . GcsArsa di la tw ay 4r 16 . J KAKI talon A.A.111 • .dittid IA afar • ellj.••n Petry Deg it 13 -ton ri es Ce• I Is Lard *wool, rrica 0N 4 aL , 11.4147 Mr C r .,. le tort' hisrira! I.rwri I uitt' 1.3.1? Soloed scr Mr liege* x ;at LW, Eerily II &tun NPLetril Ur L IPLe Lye. Demi 3. I . siminme s 1.14.nre Imo W 7 V. Multi re t; 64 1‘' Thisit bitP.iett te • bilkinaf R. '4)11 Mike* a! Met fiGionce.llll et Moot Lad 11,8 Wolff ' a*" &acts I uly ■• Sr 1.....5fay .us. a ism Ike eiri if b a el 'foam itti " Moe e r r he 1.. itsuni .r 4 , 1. , :ft I; IT a mud qt r St !G 114A4 L) VIM Id t. 11,1 11 A ;: Luc It r •''S Pr 11 .• Ft V 1 g • 1 ..1 ...id itch r • e triln ihrti;in to from • hat 4 " Mal' ~..4 : 1 1/ ' es I I , rd (Niel ;71 cosy Goo ft..) 's -• • ark* '' r4u . • PA uigit N "Sal' - 11.46 0 ,. Fear 10 t • t • IfrAikJe 1,1114 I°9 I /Ut 141' Co in h 111 • t••••• k li b.t.i vdMn 0, • ta.,14 fi r , teed. t•••• r wi., R tc4 .1 f.r 'ln v , T . " 4 14.d' Lad%