The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-11-11 00:00:00

it 1 air this face of . tibiawnerd mitt a case as amid entitle him to relief. Ile wished she so sehrert to what had fallen from his Lordship respect ing Omani's inserting matters in bills not furnished in their in structions. The LORD CHANCX.LLOR desired he might be undevittood on the point When tint he came to the Bar, an ninino.t S° ll e it "r brought to him instructions foe a bill, the whole of which he elated were the coinage of his brain. He (the Lord Chancellor) 1-hem to have any thing to do with it, on which the Solicit* told dist he did not understand his duty ; tha t it was necessary far: ; yetang man to begin with firing off a great gun, and making au e Women: • Be told him that he might then take his gun to sun* o ,e else, and get him to put the poker to the priming, as he was set the person foe his purpose. lie must here repeat what had 0 ., :e been said by Lord Thurlow to Mr. Madox, that it the abuses it! !he Court of Chancery were to be !chinned, they could only be sefk tined by the honour of Ceunsel who attended him, by not stir. feting allegations to be introduced into a hill which th ey knew had ) Maeda/son in fact. if a Solicit* gave improper instructions to Counsel, 4e *mild be acting in a way that the Court, if it detected !t, would take a method to prevent his repeating. His Lot4Ship then proceeded to give his judgment. In the cam thin betote him, nothing could be inure clear than that the plain. iiirr bill. might be amended ; though bills of this nature usually stated thOli(le. which, if truly stated, would skew how the heir at Jaw was entitled, though at the saint: tone he took it as a rule of Court, th:.tjhe heir at law ought to know how be had become Ills. iPhtfited.,:aa the quieting of titles was one of the favourite objects oz the She, of the law. The plaintiff ought also to she* the t none of the wellies who had been in poesession as heirs had so dealt with the property as to bar his claim, as these estates were of such a narree 0,11. tae whole of them might have passed by will or bin it should be remembered, in the present cue. that wes a &Murree to the whole bill, which could not stand unless u.c whole otltlre bill be bad ; aid there certainly were some definite distinct allegations in the present bill which were clearly good. and w%ich ought to he answered. The general nature of such bills was, that ss heir at law had a right to know how his title hail been dhispgointed, be suggested that the defendant had in his pos. session seenellceds which, although they might defeat his title in a /.cart of Equity., yet they would not defeat it in a Court of Law. It had happened in his own time, that the gentlemen of the Coins neon I.ww, judging from King's leneh pleadings. had tiled bills in tars Court. and had got answers which enabled them to procure an interlocutory judgment, that such terms as were contained in the a-swers shsuld not be set 119 a Court of I Ali. For his own part, 1% had always refused such' applications. In the case before him them was an allegation that the plaintiff was heir at law; he Ovught it might be doubted whether such allegation were perfectly tut. The dMieulty in the case was, to discover what was truly set mit he was happy to hear that the bill was drawn consonantly 'frith the imstemttions; that being so, he eerminly thought that there weer parts of.it that required answering, and that the demurrer ceald not stand ; he therefore decreed that the plaintiff should be ali_uwed to amend it, coctinning the V iee-CLaticellor's decision. VII3E-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, WEDSTPDAY, Nov. 10. • WEALL V. streE. Al Ilaiints stated the nature and the pleadings o! this use. A 7.1 r: theme, whose daughter was about to b: married to Mr. Henry Rice, entered into an agreement, and contraeted to settle, either by a cOrveyance in his lile.thite or by will, property to the amount of 2,01/oi. as a marriage portion fur his daughter. The agreement stipulated that the money should be settled on her foe her life, and attex her ditath to go to Mr. Rice and the children of the marriage, their attaining the age of 21. The sum of 3.0001. was not set- Cid by Mr. Greene in his lite-time, but the interest was regularly gad by him to Mr. Rice and his wife. Mr. Greene was now dead, and bad left a will, in which, among other things, he devised an estate therein mentioned to trustees for the use o f his daughter, biro. Rice, during her life, with remainder to her husband during :ire, on condition that he should, out of the profts of the estate, ••stain and elucite the children of their marriage: with remain dcr to the 6311:1 children on their attaining the age of !A : with re resieder to their issue living at the latter period ; and with remain ev to the testator's right h ei rs. This devise, the Learned Coen , el argued, *as intended by the testator, and must be considered Ey the 0004 p) he a satisfaction and performance of the covenant contained in the agreement. Mr. Rice, however, had been advised that is had a right to compel the specific performance of the ag,• - inent, and had therefore brought an action against the executors. fin: execu tem, foe the purpose of defending themselves against the the claim, had filial a bill in Court to restrain Mr. Rice from pro ceading with his action. To that bill Mr. Rice den:erred, and that demurrer was for the decision of the Court. Mr. SILIODEj: appearial in support of the demurrer. Ile con tended that the will of the testator was not intended to he a per formance cf the covenant. lie argued that it could not be a SSW. :oaten, for that implied an intention on the part of the testator that his bequest shoe:d satisfy his covenant: but no such intention wan a?parent bete, The Learned Counsel supported his argontesta by Oa wiles of ,3fat..eres v. Mathews, Faulkner v. Faulkner, and Rases. v. Zlycoo, 1:,-usen's Iteperts. PARDEII Was heard in reply. • TLe stud that there were many cares in :hose qumeti respectine the circumstance differ. erica, shich the Court would call slight. Pe should take some time to look into theme cases, and take an early opportunity to give 4 11d7nlont. VANNE L. CALEI(DER. 31r. 0/IDLVITOXI: tinted that the plaintiff applied for an In ..',l:etion to torreist the .defendant and two other persons. named Fleming and Charity, from passing certain bills of exchange, which i:e alleged Isere given by him without rcc:iving any value, but merely as a gambling debt. :t appeared that an iiiirertinent allegation had crept into the bill, and leave was therefore given to amend it. CATT OF KING'S BENCH, WEDNESDAY, Nor. 10. sitars' AND CARIE, ASSIGNEES OF C•IIIS, V. JACKSON. 1!r. BROUGHAM moved fix a Oil how cause why the verdict ie. tide case should rot be sat ult.!, And a nonsuit entered up. The point sought to be established Ey the Learned Gentleman was, that a receipt from ore of the co.plaintiffs to his client (Jackson) MSS binding on both, and an eatoppe I to an action, as Ira as the wain for which It had been passed. It appeared that the plaintitfi sera a certain stock of the assignor, and that defendant got into his pactiwision part of the produce of the sale, and other soma, to the amount, in all, of %Of. At the trial a receipt, pissed by ('arla, uric of the assignecs, to defendant for 12IL, was set up, and the moat satisfactory evidence, under the circumstances, way givcn of aottienticity.. Tie handwriting of the subscribing witness, and the Let of his beicg shipwreckof on a voyage to the 11" tat were mimed. lie 13Ir. Brougham) submitted that the receipt must be considered valid. Iktendard was, ab Ir:ilia. indebted to plain. lift's, as partners, and therefore an acknowledgment from one n:ust ie nod as •gninst Ina+. 4r. Justice LIS T DALE—izupploe You owe two llY.diVidatlll leer. and get front one a receipt fin is the faith of your paying the. money on the following day, and that you break trust, du yott tack on nub a receipt as a bar to a 7: action ; or suppose he gave a parnic ackrowliwigmoit. Mr. WWI/ GRA IL did reit corisider the cases in point: v. ill: respect tv the parole achnowledgmer , t, it was quite distinct, as that might be :nark wittiest due 4:Admire:kin ; but a person giving a ieceipt must Always be mere or less on ,;unit. LOBO Chief? JUST IC the receipt were fraudulently had, whit would be its vidu„ ? Mr: Bitoooytax conceived is validity could not be affected by ti ;a s, c ircumstance, as it was not competent for a party to set up his own fraud in a .s we: to :dm document he uiigh:. have execute'. In support of this point. he cured a variety of caws, among ethers, one tried before Lord Elio :borough. and reported in lit Campbell, 3:01. and the case of Iltinderson v. Wilde, 2d I. ampbell, Cl s ; and further. if plainttais intended . to impsign the receipt on the pound of its bring obtained by coitus:on, the true way to proceed would be to call as a Court of Equity, Cr even on this Court, for its inter.- Fus.tion to prevent tleferthints from ufferire it in evidence. 'll/e Loan CD I t• J t sine: E—l'hough the receipt be good against Carla, it certainly cannot be to against the ciliar plaintiff, and be of necessity must join Canis in the action. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALL-11e3rly ; a man cannot vet up Iris awn fraud to relvemtage himself : but in this case is no eel. dente to connert hkaif with the collusion ; the panics tlicreh , re nut 4a J ustice Mr. Justice BAY LEY—Upon what grounds can defwtiient evil foi a sonssit ? There TCUlaill 3111. Stirs due, without considering tha 1211. for which the receipt is pa3001.-31ctiun refused. THI;III.3TONE V. TIERSOV • Mr. Scan LETT moved for a rule to slow cause, why a new trial almuld not he premed in this case. The action was brought •tor•Brapasa, and was tried at the last Anhres for Appleby, before AB -justice Bayley. The verdict was for the defendant, a"d the preSent application was grounded on u misdirection of the Learned Loge.:* The plaratiff: was a tenant et' the defendant, and the trespass consisted iu ti:c plaintiff er.terinh his bait! against his i rriU and threshing out his oats and selling them. Si: weeks prenatal' Is the trespass, a etistrms was levied on the premises of the 'plaintiff; and an agreement was then entered into between the lain tiff and defendant, that the oats shoul d he threshed .•.t, that they 'aisould be sold to a mobster to be named by the plaintiff; and that. tiff proceeds of the sale sh o u ld g o to the defendant to ' the distress. The principal alines? for the plaintiff, on tieing re called. bit the 'Atoned Judge, described the contract to he O:TC br which the plaintiff was to have remained in possession of the cr.lis upt;l they were threshed out, and that they were then to be sold ler the satishictim of the distress. The point of misdirection of whi,ll he conipleine I, was. that the Learned Judge del; it to the Judy to consideei.wbether the plaintiff omitted to thresh out the oats within a realionable time, and if he did so.ro tire: fur the defendant. There ,vas no evidence risen on either side of such inntision. and the Jurj trete thereby di:cried to found their decision, riot upon the evidence, but on a Cotecture of his one supgestion. Th e ' A nis jUSTICE referred the Learned Jialgrds noir,. and was of orinior. that the direction was warrantei by the rireurustances V the des:.--Rule refused. PARTLY PRESTON. Mr. Sergeant Cans; moved roc a rule to show cause wit' juttp. Trent 'timid nut be arrested in this case. The action was hrourta the slander, and a 'veri:e: for I. ag:iitist the defendaat. Tile voids 'timid by the defendant were, calling the pleint.ff ri , gt!e, a rascal, and a !estop." iy innuendo eons eyed by the era. • was not. The further expressions ungifted the Mtintiff from getting be would have hot were it ne• for ,von 111 oil:t.r roar; uf3r. t::. , in the tfati-at• ... r Mr. J mane BAYLES'IV an - thet, " .1 gamy .” Mr. gergsant l'neat , raid there of the deftwilmit were, that he pre hundred wary; to Aim, which 1111 ihterferesce. and his IM.Tbuivi tompley Win. The UWIT CO' I t having called the defendant a thief, unaccompanied by any inn endo. The anteing of the damages was inconsiderable, but the costs were not so, and he therefore was induced to move for a rule to show cause why the verdict ahoyld not be set aside, and a new trial granted.—Rule granted. THE LING V. MONT AG l'E AND OTHERS. Mr. RNEY moved for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be had in this ease. The action was tried at the last Surrey Assizes, when a verdict was found for the defendants. Ills motion was founded on the tact of the rind in question not being a public highway but an artificial ime, and in itself a nuisance. The question involved the right of the Lord Mayor and Corporation of London over the river Thames, which he (Mr. Gurney) main. seined was fully established, and snared by the statute of Henry the Fourth. In digging lately time. however, it appeared suf. fieiently clear that a bridge had previously existed there, and that no ground whatever subsisted tor. at sting that the causeway had been there front " ancient and immemorial time." It appeared satis factory that a bridge hail been there—that a very large bridge for. merly attend there, hut that it had recently fallen in. Plans were drawn both of the bidge and of the causeway, which the Counsel presented to the Court. lle was desirous of presenting these, for they would clearly establish the right foe which he contended, of the City of London to make the improvements. for etticting which the City of London hail been complained of. The Learned Counsel proceeded to detail a variety of circumstances, that the opening of the creek in the manner required by the City of London would be most available for the navigation of the river Thames and Med way by large vessels. It had been proved at the trial, that in one instance a revenue vessel wax in pursuit of a smuggler, and that in cinsequence of the impediment which was given by the causeway, the Captain of the vessel wait obliged to have the barge of the tete nue vessel dragged over the en ? . k. The Learned Counsel funher grounded his inotifin for a rule on various taints of misdiree non in the dirge of the Learned Judge to the Jury. Hole granted rt7TTEII r. RING. Mr. Fergearo VAVOIIAN moved for a rule to show cause wh► • new trial shoukl not be granted in this CAMe. The action was one brought by an ont.gning against An in-coming tenant. It was agreed to leave the case to arbitration ; the arbitrator decided that ISU/. should he given 11 the in-coming to the nut-going tenant for his interest in the lease, and in eot.sideration of the improvements which he had etude. The verdict at the trial was for the defendant. He ( Mr. S,rgeant Vaughan) submitted, that the verdict was founded on the ground that the real and hand-writing of the arbitra tor were not affixed to his decision, but it would be tbuod that both were attached to it, as the seal was placed upon his decision, and his hand-writing would be found bath over and under his de cision—an:fee the decision as subscribed to by him, and 91-er it, in the superscription. I laugh.) The other ground on which he moved for the trial was., that the Learned Judge who tried the ease, in his arldnits in the Jury, kft out of his consideration the evidence of the arbiter (Mr. tsalumn) in cooseqeenee of a contra diction which appeared in his evidence; the arbiter (Mr. Salmon) now put in an affidavit that that apparent contradiction arise from ■ misconception of the question. propaunded to him by the beamed Judge. Ili% evidence, if admitted, would have fully sustained the case of the plaintif as to the propriety and fairness of the defendant cisinied by the out-going from the in•cutt.ing tenant. Rule granted. RICARDO r. LONG. Mr. Pot Tors moved the Court that judgment in this case be arrested. The plaintiff was a resident in wn,e part of Italy. He purchased earthenware goods from the . defoidant. The delentlant consigned these goods to Mason and Ca. ; they afterwards con signed them to tie shipper of the articles. Whilst on the quay, about to be shipped, the goods rolled into the sea, and were unlit hoe use; and the ground on which it was moved that judgment should be arrested was, that the action was not brought against the person liable. Mason was the person liable--the gocals were consigned to him: he only procured a mate's receipt bir the goods, but lie was legally in prissession of them until the mate's nteript was exchaeged for the bill of lading. The Learned Gentleman proceeded to cite the cases of Craven and Ryder. and several others, in which it had been derided that it wet necessary to prove the exchange-mate's re ceipt for the hill of lading. in orate to maintain an action against the shippes of the goods.—ltule granted. lIVL LES T. AND It9FE. Mr. Anotritrs moved for a role to show cause why a new trial should rot tic granted in this ense. it way tried at Chelmsford, hetore 31r. Justice Ilarrough, and a verdict ' , stut for thidefendant. eiretinisi.incrs were these defentlato.'s wife came to the plaintiff's hoese; he was not at he ne wh . dst the servant went to look fur him. ,he rettir.ieed in his room, and destroyed a picture in it on which he set considerable value. That she destroyed it was fully proved by the witnesses for the plaintiff at the trial, and the Judge kit it to the Jury to consider whether they believed the o:in:fir's witnesses : and if they did (which they had no reason to disbelieve). they should find for the plaintiff. lie therefore grounded his applica;:on en the verdict being contrary to the evidence at the trial, and th, d;reetion of the beamed Judge. _ . . The Lunn Ctztrr JCSTIC r—lhe Cont use of opinion that thtrc should he no new trial. The costs to the parties would ex acd icy thi , ti; to he recovered; and out of mercy to than the Court dir,cts ;hat the rerdiet should not be disturbe d. yot I' 11 Es applied, that the plaintiff should ba allowed costs, but which was refused by the Court. Tilt LINO V. EVSSELL! Mr. Bain:Guam renewed an application which he made in this ease yesterday, fur a rule to slow cause why a new trial should not be granted in this case. It sell an action tried at the last Assize for York, before Mr. Justice Easley, in which a verdict was re turned fur the defendant. The question was one of great im portance, as it affected the imptirtant navigation of the river Tyne. the trial was to have taken place at Newcsatle. but in order to render the declaim mere impartial, and to divest it of local in fluence and partialities, it was ttansferred to Yurk. This gave rise to considerable inconvenience, as it was with en small difficulty that a Yerk Oury was made acquainted with the nature of die nuisance complain:6d of. 'Die nuisance of which the plaintiff com plain:id, was the erection of large wooden buildings, called '• Ours." These buildings were two in number, and were placed at the distance only of Itill lea from each other. They were erected for the facility of loading yeuels with coal. They occupied and obstructed the navigation of the river. Their dimensions were 33 fret in breadth, and 7.6 feet in length. There was besides a spout for the conveyance of coals, whereby, ou certain ()tensions. those •• Gears," with the spout be alluded to, occupied the space of 192 lett ecross a part of the channel which did not exceed in •ieltli 542 yania. At high water, it was estimated that the intrusion thus tic. taloned by tit -.se great wooden buildings, as he would call them, was lit yards, which was unieu hat about a preportiou of the oteu patien of one-eighth of the channel at high wart ' and one-ninth at low water, eccrniieg to arcuate calculation. The question at the trial was, wiwther these erections amounted man obstruction to t;.e ef the river ? And hereby would take on opportunity of remaking, Ow the evidence of nune of the •6 keel.men," who were most iO the issue of the trial. was tendered, but the I tesiitrun) relied upon was that of pilots, and priiripally of King's riots. sulotanee of their tesoime.ay was, that the tile., both lon the fie and the ebb, principally sets in viiim the" Gears:" that they protrude into the deepest part ei the channel ; that I opposite to them is a send haul, where even small craft ca::tiqt nryigate, and that, except with a leitiling wind, and etc:: then, at coin:Arable risk, it is dar:rerous to navigate round •hem. in the apt rehension tit tilling fuel it them. It aas further roved that they occasioned oinstructim not only to keel-men, but ter al:or:ea.—to the f wiser. which- ca-ried coals only, and to the Meer, which carried all sons of goods. Further evidence was mt.:tn.:A ti , show. 01:3 in many instances the vessels were obliged to delay Mr a tide, or to return back to the reaper:ire homes of the owners. All these cireitinsiances, in his (Mr. Ittoughaties) mind, en obstruction to the Kine's subjects. able!' 71(119,1111Cd to II nuisance. AN, he aAS here eci•trous ot nothing the conduct of his Learned Friend (3lr. Searleit), who put to a plan of these minions ipiite ddli•rent trout that which he put in. It in. des reed to be described rather as a picttt:e Than a plan. Ilia Learmal Friend, with an ingenuity worthy of hint, afterwards told :he to wit!tdraw• this picture front their considcratitm, in order to deprive the prosecuting Counsel ot the privilege of reply; and he (Mr. Brougham) was accordingly deprived of the right of commenting on the evidence. fie had now to notice the direction of the Learned Judge (Mr. Justice Bayley) who tried the case. In dif.etion to the Jury. he bid them that they were to con sider x!u:hers public ben..tit had been rendered by the erection of these building , . equivalent and pin:mount to the Mconvenience which the public experienced by the obstruction atid further, whether a reasonable !TA' C wan allowed fur the na%igation of the river. Mr. Justice BAYLEY certainly admitted Ow he had 101 l it to the Jury, whinlier the benefit was mie to countervail any inconvenience that ini.;dit arise from the existence of the ereettim. Ilia opinion was, that, with judicious manannuent. both parties might have gone oft satisfied. Mr. naottA it f there hail bees a set-seat the public advan tages obtained by the erection of the " Gears" on the one hard. against the obstruction and inconvenience on the other, it would then have been proper and fair to submit the question in that way to the Jury ; but here the advantage was the advantage of indi viduals; it was a privaie and out a pubic benefit; the profits a ent inter the pocket of an individual. Mr. J usticv BAY f A Y.- It was an improvement in the modoefla,l - vessels, and would tend to render coals cheaper, arid 11:vre!, publicprove a pub lic benefit. 3/r. - I:taort:HAm:lltut the TeVerse W3S here the c h , r the proprietor (Mr. Russell) charged a higher pH..., htr his v conveyed to the reamtla with them loon, v.! and in a less brofien owe than they could otth.ziene ur a xh h, : procured. Mr. Justice PAYI.CY—Yet this Inman improvement in thy e15:.14. of lading vessels. and had a tendency to a public benefit. Mr. ILlNov o f AM-1 an: ready to admit that every pullic hit. prevenient tends to the public benefit ; but here. 1 CUlltele.l. 'hist the :ItiV nu cage old:tired was merely private, and that the profit ut i. v:ert to the pocket of the det - endant (Mr. Russell.; .s ptibliew might crest a house, and say it was for the public benefit, bolt if In en, roach"! on ill; premises of another person, or of the 1 , 111,14% b,. 1 might lie oh!iged to clitiiige iir remove it; it would truth,: 5011i..i.: I for him to say that he was ready to accouriatxlate the pubLe at all Ina s,inalde hours; this would not :testify an illegal encroa , Inn:tit 0n pelvises that slid not belong to lino ; fur it was marl:is: liii. own profit. and rot the public interest or advantage, irdured hint to esta'Ar•ii a !Lome there. It was fully purest at the trial that this was a stinil ir case ; ro public advantage was alleged t. be deg ir:.!:!.: trout L. The defendant ought. therefore. to hay, sx,..o.3ted .1 basin. which it would have been allowable for hint It lia%e dart:. Mr..iumice BAT LEY—That suggestion arose in uty wind at the 1 Irish, but it was said re! excavation of that kind would be soon tilhal .., , m•' to ash 'vita and rendered useless. ,) ~.: - .s, iti•A of 3lr. I.4tV 4 G HAIM I , MVO:Jed tu contend that a:: its:'i'aa': t -•cv.-!. THE BRITISH PRESS. venience should not weigh with a public grievance arising from the obstruction of the tree navigation of the river, and submitted on these grounds he was at least entithll to a rule to 1110 W cause why a new trial should not be granted. The LORD CHILI' Jusrict said (after their landshipt had consulted for a tew minutes together), that as Jostice Bayley vms of opinion that the question was one of great importance, he wished the fullest investigation lobe given to it, and the Court were therefore disposed to accede to the application of the Learned Oen. denten. Rule granted. At the rising of the Court, Mr. IluonEurcx obtained • rule to show cause, why a new trial should not be had in a case of a prosecution Mr perjury, which bad been instituted against a 31r. Hughes. The extraordinary circumstances of the prosecution formed the ground for the application. .I.llr. Hughes charged two men with the robbery of his house at Epsom, in Surrey ; they were acquitted at the trial, and they ',value the principal witnesses at the prosecution against him. Several witnesses came forward to show that the witnesses who appeared against Mr. Hughes were seen about his premises on the night of the alleged rubbery, and that strong apparent grounds for suspicion of the theft were tendered iu evidence against them Rule granted. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WEDNESDAY, Nov. 10. CLARKE V. MORSE. Mr. Sergeant PEEL inured tbw a rule to show cause why the ver dict had in this case for the defendant at the last London Sittings, should not be set aside, or why a new trial should nut be granted. The Cuter Jusrien—l have received a notice certainly in this case, but 1 ant at a loss to know on what grounds you make your motion. Mr. Sergeant PELL-1 more i: on the ground of a record In a hrevious case having been received in evidence, such record no t aving been pleaded. The Cuter JUSTICE—The record was received, because Its admission was so strongly urged by in; Learned Brother Vaughan, and apparently supported by such a shower of authorities. I have since looked into them, and I find they do not bear Man the length to which he then pressed them. Mr. Sergeant PaLt.—Truly, my Lord. one of the cases so cited makes directly against my beamed Brother. In Campbell and liittchins, Ist Amer/rill and Creswell's Reports, the reeved Is pleaded. In .Mr. Phillips's book, pp. 367 and 398, it is said, that where the general issue is pleaded, a record of a former acquittal of a pany sued a second time, may be received, but at the same time with cettainqualifications. Mr. Justice Boanmenn—What is the form of your first action ? Mr. Sergeant Pat.t.--in trover, my Lord, to recover certain promissory notes, which, as assignees to the estate, my clients thought themselves entitled to. Mr. Justice Bustrouc - u—SVell, and a Jury tell you that they think otherwise whin all the facts are benne them ? What was the form of the second action ? Mr. Sergeant PELL—In debt, my Lord ; and we object to the verdict, because the record of the acquittal iu trotter was received as evidence without being pleaded. TheCIIIEF JI.STICE-1 know there are cases, Brother Pell, in which yen can only recover certain things in trotter, and that you must resort to action of debt for the remainder ; but that is nega tived altogether in this case. Mr. Justice OszErme—What authorities are there to support the doctrine, that, pleading the general issue, you are nut allowed to give a remrd in evidence without specially pleading that record ? Mr. Sergeant PEEL.--Several, my Lord, and there is a recent case in which the Lord Chief Justice Abbott laid it down, that where a mconl was to be given in evidence, it must be first specially pleaded in other to give the other party an opportunity of being prepared to answer or to explain it. Mr. Justice Be RROUGII.—M hat ! let in patole evidence, do you say, to explain a record ? Mr. Sergeant Per. L.—Lind a some circumstances, most certainly. The Carte JUSTICE—There scans to be 'Dawdling in the case, and you had therefore better take a rule Nisi. Mr. Sergeant PELL expressed himself satisfied with this order. The matter, he begged lease to assure the Court, was cue of very considerable importance. PROCTOR V. SYMONS. Mr. Scrpesnt TARDY moved tor a rule to show cause why the verdict in this case should not be bet aside, although the damages were only nominal. But yet the Court would please to consider that the verdict carried costs, or why a new trial should not be granted. The case was tried at the last Assizes for Guildford, before Mr. Baron Graham. It was an action for assault, and much contradic tory evidence tied been adduced. The daughter of the plaintiffwas one of the principal s itsesses ; and two women, named Saunderson and Bell, were called to corroborate her. The Learned Judge, in addressing the Jury, olaservi.d that there 'must be perjury at one side or the other, and left it to them, upon a mature conatderation of the case, to say which side they believed. The trial lasted nearly half the day, and the Juty. atter some consultation, returned with a verdict for the plainte—damages one shilling. The defendant now made affidavit that he was taken by surprise a the trial--that he was not then able to meet, as lie now was, the ividenee adduced on the part of the plaintiff; whereas be had now affidavits to ',Low that the woman Saunderson was not present at the circumstances to which she swore, and further, that she was heard to soy she was resolved to be a witness. In order to punish or conquer the defendant. Under such eircucustancts, the Learned Sergestit sibmitted that a mew trial should be granted, and the more so as the defendant felt particularly anxious to remove the imputation which the consuit had cast upon his reputation. The Conn - Jurrrict, after consulting the other Judges, observed, that the court, in returieg the rule, did not wash to cast any imputation on the defendant ; altogether the contrary ; they, wished to extend the shield of their protection wherever they found it was required. But what did the affidavits state? Certainly ncthing which ntight not have been brought forward at the trial ; and how then could the Court be fairly called upon to interfere ? The occasionally granting new trials was a wholesome practice; but when the ends of justice bad been already satisfied, as in this case, the rule must be refused. POLICE. "‘! SSP/hi-HOUSE. l'ecerday, the new Lout) M AYOR. on taking hiss:at, said, that being the first time be Nit there as Uhler .Magistrate, he thought it necessary to state, that he should take the chair every day punc tually at twelve o'clock, unless prevented by illness, and requested the Officers would be in readiness by that time. S. Din.at, charged with tiring a pistol at his wife, was brought up. The woman being sufficiently recovered, attended, and stated that on the :inth. October, about nine o'clock in the evening, the pri soner came to her, and calling her by name, picented a pistol, which he immediately fired, the contents of it did not touch her; lut he instantly struck her a violent blow with the but-end of it, hie t knocked her down. lie repeated the blows until the watch. nuo came to her assistance. The prisoner was fully committed. 7'. Rai cult, who hes been several time% examined on a charge of bigamy, but no additional evider.ce being adduced, was dis charged. J. I.ce, the man who struck his wife with a knife, about a month since, was admitted w baiL ROW-STR I:}: T. Yesterday, Benjamin Born, the well-known pugilist, and land lord ut the !tieing Sun public nouse in 11 - indmill-street, Hay market. wets brought before the Sitting Magistrates, Sir B.lttnxii: and 'l'liciatas I'sq. by Morris, charged with violently assaultieg and beating Jaws tiardner, one of the patrol of this eatsblislititent, nth rescuing Janus Burn, defendant's nephew. It appeared, that a warratft had been issued at Newcastle-upon- Tyne, for the apprehension of James Burn (who, as well as his uncle, is a professed boxer), as the father of an illegitimate child whirl., with its mother, had become chargeable to a pariah in the' town. Mr. Atkins, one of the constables of Newcastle, was sent to London with the warrant, with directions to take dames Burnt Atkins applied at this office to have the warrant backed by a. 31k:dig:sex magistrate. and to procure its execution by a constable of the same county. Gardner and W. Smith, sen. received ethers to execute it ; sod they went with Mr. Atkins to B. 'turn's house on Tuesday night, where they found the nephew sitting with his uncle, steel a par y of their friends, of the same rest: with them selves. James klew Mr. Atkins, and said civi:ly, " Now do you do? I suppose von have called to sax me." Mr. Atkins and Gardner called him aside, and intuiutial hint of the nature of their business, which he communicated to his uncle, who immediately said that the business tEllbt he settled then, for his nephew should not be Liken away. The tilii:ere said, they had ins pow.e to cot.• to any arrangement, and JallieS 1113,t go with thou. It. Burn, upon hearing this, juntpad et, and exclaimed, with an oath, 6' lie shall not go;" and he and the other* barnal all the doors. Gardner and Smith retiinstrawd, and said they must take him; at the name time observing, that a eettlentetit might probably be made afterwards ...Hi the parish olfeers. This remonstrance had no alket ; I:en:Amin Burn repeating, with tremendous oaths, that his " boy Jew," 'Mould never go. Gardner prodnced his warrant and stiff, and said he must take away his primer but when the con stahle attempted to seize.J atnes Hutu, resi:aance was made; a ge iirri.l scuttle took place, and B. Burn sttuelt t:ardmer in the eve, this tacer FM severely lieatcn by him and tavern' others. f lac le the as,ailante, but which of them could tart be sworn to, W 33 tee sey that the oliicers should not go out of the house alive. Cardia r, to hi, hid a black eye, iu giving his evidence, °blench, it v. as a.ll that he happened to be without his pistols and cutlass at the time, fa.r he felt Itinirelf in w much danger, that he should, in all pre bald y, have used ore or the other. dj- , ner, said he was merely anstioua to settle the matter. %yellow his nephew being dragged all the way to Newcastle, anti art.,,- I tee p a y any thing that was reasonable to have it •• si.:-',eit"--; a sling tern, Mr settliag or bushing up a matter.) I 'X hat tile on . ..ices litt said chum being locked in and rasaulted was ti Ice all false. ~1., a. r It. t: said, the defendant might rely upon it, that, de:.• .iny I.:de:Wings for the w.sault and tlitt'lle, the fats 01 tile . a:.- menstili•tell to tiw Licensing 3lagistraitai of t;...t the) 1111141‘t whether ho was a proper have a i; at :dl. !I r. I I SO; , I, that as iar as he was iediyillnally concerned, he ohjeeka! Lc. gr.tiiiitig a pudic-huusa licence to boxing-then at all. Ile not e.ws.der it roper that liceticin should be granted to turn w: , 11 were notori.nisle in the practice of breaking die peace allene‘.t it ao;•,d their I I..anive or their profit. Burn was the: wilcred find bail. himself in Wt. and two stire l'e t, in 2.;:. , ach, to alan,r dtr charge ui assault and reacce at the 3!r. /*:•?, of ..`.lv arre. - rc.l t? :..nswer te &r. Ir.ortna..v exhibited against him by Mr. Stutely, the Surveyor of Pavements, under Mr. 11. A. Taylor's Act, fur the parish of St. Martin, fur refusing to remove a certain iron railing in front of his dwelling house, notice to remove having been properly served upon him. and the railing being an obstruction to the free passage or the King's subjects. 'Phis case occupied the attention of the Magistrates nearly the whole of the morning. Mr. I'itt, as usual, was his min advocate. Ife took several ob jections to the information, which were overruled, and then put a number of frivolous and irrelevant questions to Mr. Stuteley. Mr. Pitt, at length, on being checked by the Illagistrioes, refused to say another word, And was convicted in the penalty of ars. MARI4IOR(WCIISTREET, Yesterday being the day appointed for the final examination of Jana , : Hairy, charged upon suspicion of having set tire to the premises in Argyll-place, this office was, as on the last occasion, thronged to a great degree, previous to the commencement of the examination. Sir George Farrant, the magistrate, Mr. Alley, who appeared as eounkel fur the prisoner, several gentlemen belonging to different Firs °Aces, and a number of neighbouring trades.peuple, pro. ceeded to take a view of the premises, which are situated very near the office. The shop and kitchen armoured almat entirely consumed, but the parlour, in which there stands a tent bedatead, was but partially burnt. After additional evidence had been gone into, Mr. ALLEY said he did not choose, in this stage of the proceed. sag, to urge anything on the part of the prisoner. Sir °Knew: F T said, there was quite sufficient evidence to send die prisoner fur trial before a jury; but if he could make out a good defence, there could be no doubt he would there have the advantage of it. The prisoner was then fully committed for trial, and the wit nesses all bound over to prosecute. Yesterday W. "Ivory, apprentice to Mr. Dennison, a tin-plate worker, In Chureh.lane, Strand, was charged with assaulting his master and mistress. The complainant stated that he, on Tuesday. sent the defendant on an errand to Piccadilly, and the !actives gone nearly two hours; on his return, he being justly incensed at his long stay, remonstrated with him ; defendant became insolent, and seised a stick and aimed a blow at complainant's head, which tin. fortunately struck that of his wife (who interfered to prevent mis chief) and her comb was broken in pieces. Defendant said the master provoked the first assault. The mother of Avory, in vindication of her son, said he was moat cruelly used, and had a large water-butt threatened to be nut through him. The muster said thatwhen parents interfered in the manner which Mrs. Avory did, the apprentice began to think himself deprived of the comforts of home, and being discontented with the treatment he experiences! from his master, be became abusive. The Itlrcristmte said, it certainly was so, and ordered his mother to find bail ter her son. The parties afterwards came forward again, and it seeming the wish of each that the lad should be turned over to anew master, it ws agreed to. ATTEMPTED ASPAIMXATIOIL—reIterd3y, Mr. Jarrin, the confectioner in flond.street, attended at the office, to state sonic further particulars which had come to his knowledge relative to the atrocious attempt that was made on Saturflzy night list to assaasi. nate 3lrs. Jarrin. From his statement it would appear, that the net was committed by a tall and elegantly dr.:,•,ed man, who was observed on the opposite side of the way with a large stick in his hand, which. it is since believed, was an air gun. lle was ob. served to raise the stick tswardv his breast, in a parallel direction towards the window, and immediately after the bullet pa..ved within an inch of Mrs. Jarrrat's person. The man then walked off in a hurried and agitated manner. At the moment. another person. tall in stature, dressed in a dark coat, stood near the window, and when the shnp.gitl ran out she questioned :iim, after which ha went off quickly in the unit direction as the other person. Front the descriptions given, it is hoped the police will, in a few days, bring the parties to justice. HATTON-GARDEN. Tun CIIELSE• 111111:11Y ASYLI:X.--An in teresting looking girl, between fifteen and sixteen years of age, was brought up on Monday last, by Calton, a constable, charged with stealing a silver spoon front the house of her late mistress, Mrs. Creswell, of No. 11, Southampton-street, I'entonviUe. The pri 30fler was then remarried until yesterday, in consequence of a re presentation being made that she was apprenticed out of the Chel sgg, Female Asylum, and it was deemed advisable to have some dlllNfication made on the subject to the Geyesnots of the Institution, with regard to former character, &c. The prisoner was again brou ght up yesterday, before W11.1.141M Roomts, Esq., and the Orderly Serjeant attended, and stated, that during the period of her residence in the Asylum, there had never been any particular complaint against the I F ; she was the daughter of a pensioner in the establishment (since dead), aryl was apprenticed, at her own request, as household servant, to a man named Thomas, who appeared to have made an assignment of her to another person, a 31r. Bullock, from whom she went to Mrs. C'resswell, her late mistress. The Magistrate observed, that In respect to the charge of felony made by the privet:rig, it was not at all sustained, and it was, therefore, a great pity, that a young, sr.(' apparently innocent, female, should, through the whin) or caprice of her master, be har.ded about in this sort of way, a prey to temptation and vice of every sort. . . The Sergeant intimated, that so far 41 the Governors of the Asylum were concerned, they bad done their duty by her, because she was bound at her own request; but. however, they would be most unwitting any ill should bcfal her, or any of the children bound out of the Institution ; and he was authorised to say, that any recounuendation from the 3lagistrates a ould meet with i:.•stant attention. The poor girl, with tears, protested her Innocence, and stated, that her orlginal master transferred her to Mr. Bull ock, only be. cause be eniild not give her sufficient employment. At Mr. Bud. lock's she received the most serious ill-treatment, and accordiney songht another situation. The Magistrate said, that Thomas, the feat master, had no right to assign her, without permission of the Chelsea Institution Board, and was therefore still bound to protect her, and rtcum. mended the Sergeant to take her back to him, with his (the Ma. gistrntes) injunction to do his duty by her as a master, unless the Board thought proper to have the indentures cancelled. CAN N INA L !SM.—Nance Skllivan, a lady from the Emerald Isle, who is another Nagy in appearance, was brought up by Kelly, a Bow.strest patrol, charged with uttering counterfeit coin. Kelly, who is himself a son of Erin, and a most powerful young men , semcd c ompletely worn out, from the violent struggle he had to bring this virago from Battle.bridge. where she had at tempted to pass oft' some bad shillings at a baker's shop. Calton, a constable, who is no very great friend to the " smashing association," stepped fors and. and having eyed the fair culprit as she stood at the bar, ptonour.ced her an old, and wog daring, offender. -- - This roused the half-smothered home of Neerr's revenge, and despising all foolish etiquette, yr respect fur-the Magisterial pre. sence. she roared out with Stentorian fury, " You lie, you riatio, I an't—only let me get at you." Presuming that a few hours' co' .finement would cool the fervent hem of the lady's temper, the Magistrates ordered her to be locked up in the strong-room. when she was, with some difficulty, searched ; and whilst Calton was standing within a few paces, she made a spring at him. and with the certainty of a tiger. contrived to bite a piece out of his check, whidt there is no doubt she immediately swallowed, evert without submitting it to the process of mastica tion. She was ordered for re-examination on Wednesday. The man's cheek bled profusely, the wound being inflicted a little below the eye, where a number of small arteries see situate. QUEEN-5441...tRE. Jam f•s 11,) , !re, landlord of the Prince of 11 - ales public-house, Kensington iiore„ seas brought before 1). W. GuEuunte, Esq., for an moonlit on s person named 31anning. It appeared that the complainant, who is a lie macd hawk:-r. en. tered the house to vend his goods, when defendant took up a pair of braces and offered to purchase them, but they could no: agree to price, and defendant insisted he would keep them. sorne time after he called again, to request the article to be returned or the money, when defendant seized him by the collar, .rd violently kicked him nut of doors. The warrant was put into the hands of Weide and Woadberry. The defendant behaved very abii‘iyely to .'tent, and laid hold of %Voodberry by tlw cellar, saying he wra doe:mined not to go. Weale Crding his partner thus assailed, interfered, and by force brought him to the otiiee. He was held to bail, to answer for the assault. and to give 24 hours' notice. Vuterday the had being approved of, he was libe rated. SUICIDE.—On Monday evening Mary Wray. lately a housemaid in the service of Anthony Brabazon, Esq. (.'l lector of Excise, terminated her existence by taking a quantity of arsenic. She went into Mr. Fogurtv's shop, in SI:op-street, on the above evening, and &lea for two penny worth of arsenic, which the shopman declined giv ing her. She appeared annoyed at the refusal, and said she was servant to Mr. Brabazon, and that her name might be entered in the book as having bought it ; upon which she was told to bring a note from her master, and it would net be refused. The unfortunate woman succeeded in obtaining the fatal potion elsewhere ; and when her death was ap proaching, she acknowledged what she had done, and said • she lisd been driven to it by the upbraidings of Mrs. Reid, ' the latter having accused deceased of being improperly con nected with her husband, William Reid, who was also in the *orrice of lir. Brahazon, as butler, and by whom, it is supposed she was pregnant. She expired in great agony. An inquest was assembled by Richarthan Huey, Esq. Coroner, and after examining some witnesses, an ad journment took place to the next dav, in order that the con tents of the stomach might be analysed in the mean time • Surgeon Pentland having opened the body for that purpose, ascertained that she was three menths gone with child , and it is most probable that the apprehension of the ex iporaire which must S9Oll follow, combined with the up. braidings of Mrs. Reid, affected her mind so much as to cause her to commit the rashtat.--Dro! , !ieda Jez;77.al. BARBAROUS MURDEItS IN LI. A few days ago we gave an account of th e b o di es of two didd'clt believed to have been murdered h av in g b een f ound at Boston, and we now give some further particulars of this mysterious affair hoe, the Button Gazette. It appeared that a child was missing is t h e month of February last, and never since beard of, although r etr y possible means of giving publicity to the circuminuict was reaorte4 to. thi the 26th Wt. as previously stated, two children were wand in a barn. An inquest was held on the bodies on Saturday W a night, before J. H. Holloway, Esq. coroner. The body of thedifid which lay on the first Boor of the granary w a y insiceted by t h e jury. The long time it had lain had obliterated every feature ; o i vermin a hich infested the granary had eat part of the body, puts. elderly the fingers on one baud. Several marks of blood were oy. served on the clothes, fully proving the committ a l o f a rapt. this was not the only marks of cruelty discovered ; round the seek and rather inclining to the extremity of one of the ears, it was eery easy to dimwit a mark caused by the tight pressure of a cord w other ligament. It is highly probable that the villain whu pep, tested this atrocious crime pulled his victim up by the cord mow the neck into the Lille roof where it was found. Jainea Thomas Tester, and Robert Hall, deposed to the findip t of the body. Both thought it impossible for the child to have go t to the creitng, or for a man to have carried it up in his unit, b uil , might have been pulled up by a rope. Mr. J. It. Rogers, surgeon, stated, that from the very m in d state of the body, very little medical opinion could be offered. The marks of blood on the under clothes of the child led to the conclusion that violence had becn committed on her person. Thew also appeared to witness a fafrow round the neck of the child, ma a coed had been tightly applied. seawall Smaller, mother of the child, identified the bonnet sat pattena found in ti.e granary as thane worn by her daughter on the 26th February last. the was eight years old. Deceased left h ome a few minutes before nine o'clock in the morning, with the Um tion of going to the National School. The granary where the b ody was found is on the road to the school. The extreme agitation of the wimess cannot be described. p ee of her children was burnt to death sonic years ago; and she ear truly appeared a Rachel weeping for bet children, and refusing to be comforted because they are not. George Smaller, husband of the last rituals, also identified the dress of the child. Did not miss the child until night ; it au s very rainy day, and thought she had stopped at the school, but found, on inquiry, that she had not been therm Witness dragg e d Boston river fn a fortnight himself, and n.ade every inquiry, b et could not find or hear ofhis child. James Chanttey, clerk to Mr. Sheppard, who occupied the gra. nary, deposed as to the grain in it at diderent periods ; did not re. member the key cf the granary being taken from the office of tee Nth February ; it was not cub:ornery to ask for the key ; the po. sons who want it take it from th e nail ou which it hangs h. d:: office. - . Harriet Jackson, Mistress of the National School, Roston, d e . posed, that Frances Smaller was one of the Scholars last lama; deceased was not at school on tile .6th; en Or 2.ith she was; tal not seen her since. She always came very cheerfully to school, st- 4 , wimeas had not occasion to correct her in any manner oc Oc in preceding her death. Robert 3laydwell was elarnineil several times, hat his emirs " was a mass of contradiction." Benjamin Benton, who lived with Mr. Sheppa:d at the that, said Maydwell used generally to open the granary windows • some. time. they were opened by hinisch. Did tint know that he tad el conversation with Maydwell about the child being lost. The Inquestst was then adjourned to Monday ; in the manners messerger was despatched to London, to procure the snag. ance of Thomas Parker, whose nave had been inentiored is tbs proceedings. Richard Taylor, a shoemaker deposed, that about a wetk afar the child was lost, Thomas Parker, who was frequently at sit. ness's home, told him that the child wu found at the Dui of lira Sheppard's granary. Parker said he had seen the child, and the it had ben pulled out of the river. Witness mentioned what Parka said to .Me. Davey. Parker was always in low sp"m, cried much, and once said he had something on his comic= Oat morning in June last, Parker had got some essence of sugar in s cap, and was going to swallow it, but was prevented by atticser wife. Parker took witness's cutting rut knife with him. Thomas Davey corroborated the last witness, as to the =res. don between them. Wits. Hayes, waiter at the Dolphin Inn, deposed that Porker slept theta in slay last, and also about Suter six weeks since, wren he pulled a knife out of his pocket, and putting it to his ova body, said, " I hope this wi.l do the deed ere long." Several other witnesses were examined, but their evideere is net of importance. The Inquest was then adjourned to Thursday, to wait the snivel of Parker. On Thursday morning the Jury es. amined the premises ; the general conviction was, that the ciLl bad been enticed into the granary In the morning, the rape con. mitted in the first floor, and the child niunlered to prevent deer. tiou, and the body put in the third floor, which was rsr.ly cues. John Pooks, waiter at the Still inn, deposed that Parker ad be bad something heavy on his mind, and would be hanged. Hannah Tavlor gave similar evidence, as to Parker, to ittt of her husband, Richard Taylor. Thomas Parker, who bad been apprehended on a Slags it warrant, was brought in and examined, but rot on oath. lies about 38 years of age. Ile stated that be had lived with IL Robert Sheppard, as groom. He positively denied that Le tic over told Puoles, or Taylor and his, wife, that be should be hop:: his low spiriu and unettincu was in consequence of his wife haring left him. There was In Porter's appearance none of the confirm: artiste of discovered guilt, or apprehended punishment. In a calm and composed manner he walked up to the coats, and after looking to a tea moments at the body, he exelainiod in a distinct and Wel tered tone.—" This is a shocking spectacle, but I had no hard :2 it, 00(1 knows." He was then asked if he bad any objeetioasto touch the body. Ile said, " Certainly not; I neva injured the little innocent :" and then firmly placed his right hand co dif ferent pens of the body. The (:Droner summed up the ev:dericer and the Jury, aftet a short deliberation, returned their verilla—" Wilul Murder against some person or persons unknown." SEt'OND INQUEST. Another inquest was held on Tuesday, on the body of another child, seven years of age, found in a pit adjoining Maud Forest Dam. Several whmsses were examined, and there was no doubt that the child had been murdered ; and it appeared from the en dence of Slr. Hollway, the surgeon, that there was some reason to suspect that a rape had been attempted on the child. Alice Hattenborow, the mother of the child, deposed to the fact amassing her, and identified her clothes, but no clue was obtained as to the individual who bad perpetrated the horrid deed. Verdict --" %l'ilful murder against some person or persons ac known." SPORTING INTE I.I.IGENCE. We are informed that the excellent pack of harriers kept Was. Paull. Esq. of Truro, afforded a numerous party of grit, men much tine sport last wed:. near Il'ainhouse Corner, hundred of Stratton ; three brace and half of hues were mu! out, and every one of them killed by the harricrs without a chat. —Draan Pa 1 1 / 4 7 . SILIPPLit, TUC riDESTRI•lf.—This man, there is very errs doubt, will accomplish the arduous task ha began last witt.of walking 50 miles for 21 successive days ; up to Friday night, beisg the twelfth day. he had completed his daily task, returning e‘cy day between eight and nine in the evening. lie creates a cend.tr• able degree of interest in this town, crowds assembling ever; evening to witness his arrival ; to add to his notoriety. lie but band of music who usually meet him mar the turnpike-pre, an.l accompany him to his quarte s. llis receptinn at Ilitigeway. new, &c. in going thrt.ugh anti returning, is very warnl—/:—: Paper. CORN EXCHANGE, Nov. 10. Our market ha► been well supplied with an Grain since Mr , day. In prices of Grain we have no alters:Am to note; Lot t:.. trade was extremely heavy to-day. FISli MARKET, TCE3DAY, Nev. 10. s. d. Cod, each . S oto DI 0 Turbots, each 111 oto 30 0 Wills, each 3 0 to 12 Haddock. (large) per half-do:en 10 0 to 12 0 Ditto :soiail) s. d . s .! Sloths, the % 3 0 tot: Flotanders,tho IT. 2 6 to 4 t Dabs, per basket 1 ti to 5 C ditto 3 0 to 4 ( Berrings,the led 4 U to 7 d Bloaters, ditto 0 otolo e Lobsters, each 1 6to I I Prawns, pet lb. 3 oto 3 t Stoimps,pergall. U U to 2 k Cottonton Oysters dozen 10 0 to 12 0 Sohe, per pair I 0 to 5 Wlaitinga,the hi 5 0 to 12 0 Skate, per 15. 0 6 to zi.,l4ton(aitoped) per IL. 4 0 w 5 0 - (various): per bushel - 10 oto f 4) Natives, ditto lie t. I):).(dried)pe.- lb. I 6to •! 0 Eel*, per lb. U 9to I U MARRIED. On the 9th inst., at Stepney Church, Mr. Joseph l'olet , attl.. • the lllinorier, to Ilias Franeei llopire, fourth daughter of the la:. John !Immo. Esq. On Tuesday, at Kensington, Robert Hamilton , Esq. of Nor• wood, surrey. to Mary, only child of Mr. John 3lau.warteg. ' Chichteter Rents. Chancery-lane. At St. George's, lianove.r-square. Mr. Amb. G. Camt,hell. t•• • gem, eldest son of the late General Charles l'aini•htil, to !t. Anisitick. DIED. On the sth inst., u Margaw. the Dowager Lady Dryden. tons..lslib v, Northamptonsh ire. On the thh inst. at Sandg.ite, in Kent, aftr'r nn illness of ten dart. Sophia, wife of Henry Merria Hoare, of Yurk-p:aeo, square. Esq. On Saitifdly last, suddenly, M. Butt, Esq. of :11,dri;:c-Ila . near Bideford. Lately. nt Kindy, of remittert f, vet, might on an otSeial toot it thr Seven Korles, the lion. Sir .1.1 . ,u1 D'oyly, Merrha7 . si hi o s n :t e l r a t; i t es .i t i y;: m C l i n su a n n e t il in in t t h 'nL n o , dy n an tid Fits: Comm: , _ - • -•- - MGll WATER THIS DAY AT I.4INDoN BRIlx;E• Morning 1 min. af:r 50. I Afternoon 13 mm. idiot PLinted 'I . 11 I'. lilt ill! , It l' HESS Office, by J. W. I•it In. ..,:rand, by B. Ca.: a r> • (11PL y~~~ NO. 6, Tr. Ott nc)mil,‘ Ship AMITI TOGE lying in the excellent accommod Serzoon. For Freight or Pa St. Helen's PI:. attelt ; " to THE La)Nix) , THE Proprict( fermi,' Steen Vowels have diseon of which due leaky , 9th November, IA 1 - IINING ROI ing of the fi `that' value :-- 4 iis Chairs, with scarlet 1 r3p;4l ftr-atolu Las ,},:hoar but Datti To be aim at l iar WIC!! AND T 1 [SHE "First 1!;. — rem — ived at C. I D A late partner Kananculus. Anion hundred to 20s. the c A supply of New Hamw aids and lat Rs. in packets, Is. Cameos Liqueurs.. I 'ENTY-SE r 1 .Money ready Tradesmen, and pri in Sums not less th .iinndred Pounds. Tradesmen and 0 still find this a favou upon moderate term mhos persons .p r y to be disoout at 7EO . tes, pone paid svoot, Goaimatial4 CHILBLAIN AJEPUT 01 the basis of ti Continent as a rem( feettans,Chilblains, Sprains, Bruises, an .1 Engbud. proves t ire mast eminent in Being combined in euving, and cons application. Rubbe s•tnn Land, it ails, absorbents, and aced Sold in Bottles, ur Cheapside. St. Paul itoonao London; al out the United King, Ofvhoec gen tna — y excellent Keened! fin N;b. Be gleeful to bilis Cerate. Tbta di NARRATIVE FACTII RI N , INOS of °OVER? to SCOTLAND. tl• pension of the Hab count of the Smoot goir and its Neiebl ceedings in other Pat wood and others, for BT London: Printed . friars. Early in Noi RECOLLECT BYRON. fro the PTOCKSO of his I the English Bards, f ing his mit charartei menu, in Ite possessi By ill . . To which is pi -, e'fiv the suppression of L and his Letters to I Also, a Report of Hobhouse and Hon London: prin Ver %hortly will t T HAN-ELS in u lums the u.ost pnpu pity, upon the physical a s upon aeothe n te t s, h . csgricultutt I utina r s designs of the leadei des Debut. London: pni I s e jtiv T (lcernii.::),,,,u lt igraciou.ch.. l beiliutu.ibenci d vreptahn,rs a cywer3.d y eaTor___pxizrpuTh i biriTA,l2.ey,:sierse:lmarii i : a b , Tyressim lia l .ela : re l njoronw, h it. R. Weida, Esq Murilln, Claude. VRIENDSHII membranter, I Igro ; fitted up i Virgil, esPresely fin Copies with Proofs c Shillings. The ►er► fiatteriN e h e It f __Gat henimit"ilar.:":4,3Pme,:ltilf.fintova;intriPtbdshonnlilme:Lia) e.ierfd.r.sres");Ettcehyot.untrf'3elffewte.al.llll': i p E D. J lSl P i , . ,lit. n etet ,. ir tii a b oromy lu ard li t r e lt h g , m e lt , T fro y ss ße :o an: Sophia,. ;s i xn Thomas . a}L:lc ia onisg . eie tas, b . e rn ifb a , phit by :..°oahntr Mrs. }'• —1 n l t iEst: oo nirigted d ho o ~,n,moto to toot v ( enids—The Year 11 LIST or }:sort. l 'elnents-2. Press 4. Fanciful Dedicati of St. Petersburg 7 good Shepherd , frc b► Claude, in the N Four Seasons, from h ouse. January -1( Rochester Castle , 21. Tunbrid cernber, idled 7:4"111,PN:°"1-bir;istnobtrert' i 14