The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-01-07 00:00:00

i I, 1 f } ~ l 1 F r 1 a II Waimea*. The wend trameser wassJobn Monaghan ; he w not an attorney ; he was, however, all but an attorney ; he was the confidential ernissery of blegulte„ and was the very soul of the pre sent aeIIITIVIICV. Bennet and the other male traverse's had been niameiled errant" of the Noble Marquis; they had eaten his bread, god betted of repaying him with gratitude, they had been only ready and active to betray his interests, and " bear false witness against him." Mts. Anne Connell. the other traverser, was of the lowest are most degraded clue of female society—a wretch, who did not shrink from the revolting degradation of assuming shame and infamy to herself, for the purpose of accomplishing bee wicked purposes. Her own confession, as cootained in her depositions in The defensive allegations made before the Consistoriel Court, would be sufficient to 'wiles= and to convict her. You, Inentlernen, are im doubt surprised how the Marquis of Westmeath could come into contact and collision with such persons as three; it would be, therefore, necessary to explain the circumstances that led to the kernation of the present conspiracy, and the causes out of which it grew. In the year 1812, the lllarquts of Westmeath (then Lord . Ravine) was married* Lady Emily Cecil, daughter of the late and sister of the present Oterquis of Salisbury. This union had received the approbationeof both the illustrious house"' of Cecil and act Nugent, and rarely had a union been formed with fairer • prorpects, sad under happier auspices. She was a lady then gay, young, and beautiful—full of life and spirit ; and he was then at a I cried of life, and in a rank, which rendered him in every respect suitable partner far such a lady. His attachment for her was as deep and sincere as it was permanent ; aiid if wealth. honour, power, and lolleenee, could contribute to render the marriage mate happy, they had every reason to ealettlate on continued and uninterrupted mutual happiness. For lee years they did lire happily together, during which period they were in noseeseion of domestic enjoyment, interrupted only by occasional diffeeenete which he might term slight breezes , that ma y be Laid to vary wit hout' disturbing the general serenity of domestic life. For a cortelderable time he was on the Centir.ent with his Lady. ' They also lived in the society of the Marchioness of Salisbury, in Lehdon, and at the country seat of her family in England. In 1814, the Earl of Belville inherited the_estates and titles of his tither. The fruits of the marriage were two children—the one Lady Ruse Cecil; born in 1817, and the other a son, an only son, who, to the uncxtinguishable grief iris parents, was swept away to an untimely grave.. I am unwilling to allude to the unhappy differ ences which I admit to have existed—they were, however, perhaps not attributable to the faults of either of the parties, but to a diver sity of tastes, tibiae in the fashionable phrase, might be called ea cessive sensibility of temperament , b ut which we would more Val. pry cull irritable temper. The co , sequences were. lam satiation, equally unpleasant to both. Lord Westmeath was an Irish Noble. man : he loved his country, he delighted in country sports, and he wished to en ioy them at his country residence. Lady Westmeath had been differently educated : she had been in the gayest circles of society in London, of which she was the idol and the ornament, and it is not to be wondered at if she preferred the eplentli i glories ToT Sr. James's to the seclusion of a remote residence in Ireland. The Marquis of Westmeath was an easy and forgiving man, but, lake most men, he bad a wish to be master of his own twine, and was an advocate for the .eanyire law. On the other hand, his Lady ens a descendant of the celebrated Cecil, the favourite of the • Virgin Queen, and It was not to be wondered at if she entertained a partiality for what was called petticoat government. (Laughter.) Amongst other feelings she entertained was a strong feelieg t.f jos. lousy. This was rather a foible than a fault ; but it inclined her • to attend to the representations of the busy and ill.natured persons who surrounded her—those half-listeners and half-inventors who fasten upon f a milies t., and strive to breed dissension in them by idle tales and false stories. By such persons was Lady esimeatli -surrounded ; they exaggerated the gallantries tif he hod any )of her Noble Lord. It was painful to allude to those demesne differences. Suffice it to say, that towards the end of the year 11317 they became violent Indeed, and thus a union was inter , tamed, which had commenced under retch happy auspices. About the year mu it was suggested to her, for he knew it could not be her men idea, tnediandon the father of her children and the hus band of her choice. Accordingly she left his residence suddenly, without Ille s turaletlee, and against his consent, taking with her both her children. In a moment of fondneess or of weakness, herd AVesttneath had executed a deed, by which he made over a part of his property to her Ladyship, which she conceived to give her au exclusive turisdiction over their children. This fact of being reflected independent of her lewd, prompted her the more readily te take this step, by which she threw (41'11 subjection to her hus bend ; and this conduct of hers, I am instructed to inferm you, eras discountenanced and disapproved of be her mother and all the . members of her family. Lord Westmeath was naturally anxious to recover his children, particularly his son, who he expected scull one day be the inheritor of his titles and estates. In order to effect this purpose, the restitution of his children, he was ae. vised to have recourse to the law for redress ; and accordingly writs of Heber Corpus were resorted to without number—suits, both in law and equity,were inatinited without number ; arbitrations and adjustments were entered upon, but they were invariably broken off by the influence and intervention of the unshaven' by horn Lady Westmeath was surrounded. In the source of Wigs. tem which was here opened, a field presented itself for the exer cise of those talents of Mr. Bernard Maguire, for which, in the earlier part of his statement. he gave him ample credit. He was Lere quite at home—as much so as a salamander in Ins own native element of fire. Lord Westmeath was advised to institute the only mode of redress open to him, which was. a suit in the Consistorial Court. The Civil Law does not provide relief for the abandon. mon of a husband by his wife. The case is one belonging to the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Court, which obliged a woman ehe forgets her duty to her husband to Main to him. Ace onrdingly, about the commencement of the year 1821, a suit was instituted by the Noble Marquis for the restitution of conjugal ' rights, the effect of which would be to compel her to return home, and to place herself under the protection of her husband. I n a suit of this kind, two species of defence can alone be Fe: up: firstly, the cruelty of the husband; and secondly, the Erse..' nt the commission of adultery by him during the venni coverture. And here it was worthy of remark, that tee plea of adultery had, in the first instance, never entered her bead .Some defence was, however, necessary to be made, and a defensive allegation was accordingly fileti,in which s as a justification to: leaving him, cruelty, on his part, was put forward. Now it was not • very easy thing to define what cruelty was, or rather it was definable by each person's respective notion of it. This lady, lie had no doubt, was convinced that it was a cruelty to confine a per son, who had been accustomed to the society in which she was wont to move, to the retirement of a secluded part of Ireland. In the lan guage of a lady, it would be an indiscreet exercise of authority to oblige her to live where her husband pleased ; bt.t the Jury, as husbands, would feel that they had a right to control their e :yea in these points ; so determine whom they . should, and wheat incy should not visit; whom they should receive and whom they elineld exclude from their society. This the lady might think cruel; but when the questior: came before the Judges, with long robes tied flowing wigs, this cruelty was found merely to be a proper CUT case of authority. If the charge had rested on this plea alone, Lady Westmeath would have been restored to the society and protection of her husband ; but those under whose influence she was were not eaticied here ; a new effort was to be made—it require! a masterly 'trokr—and who wet to achieve it? No less a person than Benign! ileguire. Here was a dignos rindicc rodeo, and Bernard I-iagoire was the guardian angel to step in and extend his protee tien to the Marchioness of ll'estmeath. lie was ready with bold end eeeperate advice : the charge of adultery wcs to be sustained, and he was to provide facts, &tee, witnesses, and all. If they bad been prepared with this ease of adultery in the first instance. a ould they not have brought it forward, without allowing the interval of a year to elapse after the failure of the first charge, before they pro duced it ? A person, too , was found to dep ose to the adultery, in Arum Connell. who was taken from the stews of Dublin, and who seas reedy to falsely testify to her own shame and dishonour for the purptaa cf sustaining this c h arge. She was ready to swear that so early as 1815 she had had adulterous intercourse with the Noble Lord; that she Itad criminal intercourse with him at his own house in the country, and at the Leinster Hotel in Dublin. This low, degraded, miserable creature went so far as to oily, that he had made a settlement of lee a year upon her; that he had two children by her, who wets born at the Lying-in Hoe ; and that she was to have 101. • year additional for every child she bore him. These children, she said, were a boy and a gel—the one named Henry and the other Frances. A more erourellees story—a more Use invention, had never been faliti. vetted. Let this woman be edged of by the coninulictiotis and im probabilities which abotend in her depositions in the Ecclesiastical Court. The defect of her examinations there was, that the wittiest have written, and not oral testimony, as in our public Courts of Justice. She deposed there, that at was a servant in the Leinster Hotel. It woeld be proved that she never had been asertant there. Wm further swore, that she used to open the door of his Lordship's house in the country t that he used to give her tea in the evening ; that she used to steal up to his bed-room ; but that in the morning lrc tired to give her spirits to maks her intoxicated, in order teat she might not know the wen she got out. As to her going in ey the door, and opening it from the outside, it would appear that that ciedd not be dove. Sn far front being a servant at Elridge's Hotel, she never had been in it. Tile Noble Lord himself would ap. pear, and swear that he had not, to his belief, ever seen this Anne neinnell—this infamous abandoned woman. T he war in which this plot had been detected was, that a man, named nlicbael Corcoran, by trade a tailor (who, although he was VaalleClCli Vith it at the commencement, yet had virtue enough not to prose cote it to its final completion), made the disclosure which mainly sustained the present prosecution. He had been appointed in find out this woman, and to arrange her ieformatitne lie was entrueted to take pesseseion of the supposed deed, making pro vision for the children ethic!' it was alleged she had by Lord 'West tonsils, but no such article was to be found, nor were there any such children in taistence. By this means also, by community. thine, principally anonymous ones, he was unable to become ac. (painted with the whole of the circumstances of this eofispiracy. It would he further exnoscil by u witness of the Dime a Mar. gsre• Shields, who shruld he produced, and whom an attempt had been made to bri b e. Large sums of money had been offered, which she had had the virtue to decline. 'l'o this testimony was to be added the publicly-avowed declarations of slaguire and3lonaghan, teat they were hostile to herd Wastmeeth. Maguire went so far as to threaten pot to leave him worth • shilling of money, or an sad ref ground. I anticipate a ground of defence will be set up for :Bayne. different from that vet up by the other traverser"'—that i: will be endeeveured to establish his innocence on the ground of hie Laing • professional man, and the; he was entitled to believe that these agents he employed were incapable of perjuring theinstiree. Awattorney certainly had an arduous duty, to discharge to his olittat ; but no attorney bad a right, or was justified in bringing forward a ease which he knew could only be sustained by take sweatitigeand by depositions which he himself knew to be false. Idiom genttlerien, are of opinion that Maguire was not aware mat convinced that the whole was a fabrication, diva the ithoie ii\b. Mi as crSusinfiice We, as applicakle to him, mast fail. One word So the law - of the case, to show that this was • cot It had been laid &Oro by the present Lord Chief (Beebe) in thecaseor the King v. Forbes, that a conspiracy was ahem " two or node, persons confederate for the purpose of effect ing au illegal purpose by whatever means, or even of effecting • USN purpose by illegal iseans." This answered both parts of the definition. The oltlect was illegal: the destruction of the domestic happiness end reputation of the Noble Marquis—the means were equally so—corrupt and false swearing. 1 have now laid the case before you ; and I will rail my noble client, although . l anticipate theierutiny that will be instituted into his whole file in the cross nalaination to which he will be necessarily subjected. But I have every confidence that your verdict will be • just one—that it will be an exemplary warning to deter other% front similar conduct, and that it will lend to the restoration of harmony and of peace to this illestrious family. The fallowing witnesses were then called : John Thompson examined---I am an Officer of the Consistory Court of London, connected with the suit pending—the Marquis and Marchionera of Westmeath. The suit commenced in 1021. Ole here proved the depesitions that were made in this suit by Anne Connell and the other traversers.) Mr. Sergeant GOOLD, on its being proposed that these docu ments should be read, contended, that they were part of the pro ceedings in the Consistory Court, and could not therefore be read. They partook of the character of a bill in Chancery ; in such a case it was necessary to produce the bill to which the answer was pot in. It was submitted no the other side, that these defensive allega tione might be regarded as a fresh suit. It partook of the nature of an original suit, on which the Court might pronounce a decree. Mr. PERRI ER, after a few words from Mr. N 0 RTH, submitted, thaathey might he read , not as proof of the matter th e y contained. but of the fact, that the parties subscribing to them had made depo sitions in the Consistory ('ours in the suit referred to. Mr. Sergeant Gootn said the Morning Post ought, with equal accuracy, be regarded as evidence against the traversers. Mr. O'CoNaioaa—Siaturrakrs's Ye-se Letter (the paper which trunnion' the speech of Mr. U Connell, for which the Learned , Gentleman was indicted ) would be better evidence. ' Mr. PonEBTY remarked that the Grand Jury were riot of the same opinion. (Laughter.) Mr. O'Corraota followed in support of atr. Perrier's ergo. mem ; anti the depositions were admitted, not as forming evidence of any subsisting suit, but hi the point of view required by the Learned Counsel. The following witnesses were then called : Michael Corcoran-1 know all the travernera Monaghan ap , plied to me about Anne Connell, and requested me to get from her a document which she possessed of Lonl Weratmeath's, settling upon her an annuity of 151. layear • his object being , as he subsequently stated, to enable body %Westmeath to obtain a divorce, by proving adultery against him. I went frequently to ;Maguire's, where I fount' .Monaghan. These two persons urged me to obtain this document from Connell, and I procured al. from Maguire to giro to her, for the purpose of bribing her; but finding she only eluded my attempts, and believing she possessed no such document, i returned the money. I afterwanis went to Anne flannel'', brother in the counter, but could not get the document. In a conversation which I had with !Monaghan, he told me, I can prove that I saw Lord Westmeath commit adultery with Anne Connell. I then remarked, why then are you so uneasy to get others to prove it, if you can prove it yourself? How can you prove it? alonaghan said, " I was coming home one morning before day ; hoed Westmeath was shooting ducks, and he had Anne Connell with him in the woods." 1 asked him then, `• what made him out at that hoar? Monaghan replied, I was at Pat Rooney's. drinking. I got drunk, and was unwilling to come home before that hour." 1 suet Anne Connell on another occasion. with Monaghan ; when she saw me at first, she ran away. I asked her why she ilia so? She made no answer, but a ft erwards joined Monaghan and me. We went together to a tavern, where we had some broth and meat, and spirits. She said, after we had taken re freshment,, that she should go and see the childieu at Vrilliams town. She accordingly went, but when she came as far as the canal bridge, she complained that site was tired, and that she should have sonic more refreshment ; she had some more spirits there ; when she came to Williamstown, she refused to tell them whore the children were, and said to Monaghan and me to the d-1 with you all." 'Monaghan further told her, that if she had ten children they should be ull provided for as gentlemen's children, and that ought to make her easy all the days of her life. I have seen Feely. I beard hlonaghan say he was told that Lord \Weromeath turned him sway in disgrace, and there could not be a greater villain found any where for his purpose than Feely. I in formed Lord %Vestmesth of these transactions, in October, 11122, in the presence of the Duke of Leinster. I know the hand-writing of J. Mongolian and Bernard alaguire. Several letters were here handed to the witness, which he identi. fled to be in the hand-writing of -Maguire and Monaghan. ' I have seen all the prisoners at the bar. I saw them going into rs. Maguire's ; on the day before Anne Conned went there, she was decently dressed, but on the day she went to Mr. Maguire, whath was the day before she went to England, she wore a new mantle and feathers; she was dressed quite differently front her usual apparel, which was generally very mean. Crostnexontined by Mr. Sergeant tiooto—l have been a tailor twenty years. I did not make a fortune in that trade. Since the 10th of November I have been residing in Roscommon, in a small house joined to Lord %Westmeath's house. I lodged in the dairy. Lord Westmeath sent me down there to protect my life. Ido not pay Lord AVestmeath for lodging there. I have worked for seve ral persons there. Sometimes) worked in the dsiry and sometimes not. Front October 11122 to 1823, I lived at No. 9, George's hill, Dublin, until :Hay, 1629; meanwhile I was in London until Fe bruary. Whilst in London I had an allowance of 17s. 6d. a week for subtleence, and 7s. a street far lodging I have said what I mid here unday for the sake of truth. I had a great regard for Lord AVestineath's father, and have some regard for himself. I bear no malice to Lady Westmeath, but entertain for her particular re gard. \Viten asked by slonaghan I consented to make inquiries. 1 did not do so voluntarily, but consented after great persuasion. The persuasion I received was a promise of 501. and he afterwards said it should be 40/. He raid me it would be decisive evidence to procure the settlement of laird Westmeath, or Anne Connell would be decisive evidence tgainst him. 1 know what adultery is. I also know Margaret Staines. (A laugh.) I do not know, nor can I guess, who was the father of her last child. I cut out of the transaction ten days before they went to Erg land on the 25th of October. She told me the article was with her brother, and Maguire told me to go down to her brother for it. I objected to go with her on the car, anti upon my word, if I were offered 501., spick and span new, of the Bank of England, I would not have gone on the car with her. ( Much surprise and laughter.) On my oath I would not. ales Sergeant oo —Would a hundred tempt you ? Witness—Perhaps not. Mr. :sergeant Onoar—Would a thousand tempt you ? Witness-1 don't know what would tempt me. Mr. Sergeant Goon's—Would ten thousand tempt you ? Witness, after a long interval, which was occupied by the Court and spectators with much laughter. replied in the negative. I have drank with he: at a tavern, near the Custom-houtle, and at the Canal. I walked with her to the Rock ; I went there by by-toads. ' I never would be seen with her in my own country. I have lodged at different place,' in Dublin, and have always borne a good cha racter. In the first conversation I had with Monaghan he told me that he had been applied to by a respectable person to make in. quintal, and had received 50/. toe making them. I was examined at Holyhead ' • the evidence 1 there gave was generally the same as I he given here to-day. I do not deny that I was a conspirator in the beginning; but I pulled against them since the end of Sep tember, and determined to expose the whole to hoed Westmeath. From the 111th of September, I disbelieved that there was any such paper as the settlement spoken of in existence, from the different accounts I received of it front Anne Connell. as being at one time told it was burnt, and at another that it was torn. 1 did not speak to Lord Westmeath to-day but fOT a minute. I saw him the day before yesterday; the Dowager Marchioness Westmeath was pre sent; he then merely told me not to spenk about him; but I told him on a former occasion, before the Duke of Leinster, all that I have deposed to here this day. (Witness here read a letter from himself to Maguire.) Jr did not contain my sentiments. I wrote it to strive and get my money from them. The sentiments did not come from my heart. Mr. Sergeant ootn—Titer you were writing a lie ? Witness--I was. The Learned Sergeant then read the letter sentence by sentence, and at the close of each asked the witness if each was a lie ? Ile replied that it was all a lie. By the COURT—If Maguire thought I was writing him these lies Ido not think he would give me the money. As the Learned DiTgLlOlt was reading tire letter— 'fhe witness interrupted hint at • passage that was somewhat obscurely phrased, and eaclairned—" I believe I was tipsy when I wrote that letter." (A laugh.) Mr. Sergeant Gooan—`Were you drunk? Witness-1 was not altogether warm (Much laughter.) The cross-examination here closed, and the Counsel for the other trimmers for the present declined cross-examining him on the part of their respective clients. Margaret Shields examined—l know Anne Connell ; she is row in Court. I was acquainted with her three months before I went to London. I saw Lady Westmeath in London, and saw Lord It' est menth, but not until after my return ; eke told me if I would say she saw two children of mine in the Lying-in Hospital it would make my fortune, and that it would do me no harm to *ay so. I was nut told I was to swear scything, but that I had only to go to the King's Palace in London, to tell the story to the King, and the 51archionests of Westmeath. (Much laughter.) Lady %Westmeath lives in London, at St. James's Palaceal Mr. alaguire met me there. Ile wanted me to say that I handed a glass of wine to lord Westmeath in the Leinster Hotel, and desired me to stick to what 1 liad said in Dublin. lie handed me two sovereigns and a half. Anne Connell was present: she made answers to the questions he proposed to me. I scented dumb to the questions lie put. 1 did not swear to the answer*. hlaguire further told me that I should have a guinea a week to support me, and that I should be always welcome there. 31oneolian also told me tint Lord %Westmeath could not go oh with a suit, end that he would no more be let into Court than a sweep. He told me it would do me no bunt to swear; that it would make my fortune, and that I ought to stick to it that I had been a servant at the Leinster Hotel. On all these occasions I invariably refused to swear, and said: there was no truth in what they wished me to aw.sr. Anne Connell told me that she had neither hand, act, or part, with Lord %Westmeath. She took her oath on a book to me she had not ; and told rne that I might as well swear that she had the children, as she was ready to swear it herself. Cruss'cia u l ined by .Me. WALLACZ.o-Thla last cormation, BRITISH PRESS. which occurred bete/um Anne Connell =dyne, took place at Palate row, In London. The first time I saw Illr. Maguire he wanted rug en go to London. The purpose for which I was to go to Lanett/ill was to say that Anne Connell had two children by Georg* Nugent (Lord W witmeatl*. His then gave me a sovereign and a pound note. I only saw Maguire twice before I went to England. I was then a servant; I supported my father, and it trephined he should receive ten shillings a week foe his euppott. After this arrange ment was made I went to London. I - remained there eight days altogether. I saw Mr. Meet* 'hardy after my arrival there. I saw Lady Westmeath Avg MI6 with me, and told me she had several friends comuli e ssa c rAid whom she did not know ; ihe asked me if I knew and if she was married. I told her I did, and that ems neeriad ; fbe I then thought so. There was a strange gendarme than. Monaghan was also them. Monaghan said several thingek and ma If it was net so and to. I said '` yes" wall he suggested, but at thahanie time I knew what he said was not true.. On my return from Lady NVestrneath's I met Corcoran near Pimlico; he was known to me before. Corco ran told me that Anne Connell had been examined, but that I ought to say or do nothing in the business, and that I ought to go home, for I knew nothing about it. Accordingly I left London a few days afterwards. Corcoran at that time was, to my knowledge, at variance with Monaghan end the others, for they told me not to meet Corcoran. The only excuse I made for leaving London was, that my father was ill, and that 1 wanted to go home. I also sold John Monaghan and Lady NVestmeath that 1 knew nothing of the business. I said that I was afraid to move in it. She told me not to be afraid, for if I were inclined she would take mj , part. After my return to Ireland I got a letter written to Lady Ntestaseath by a person of the name of Brie. Two letters were addressed to her Ladyship from me. The object of my writing to Lady Westmeath was, to get my discharge from her. I never made three attempts to induce her Ladyship to bring me back to hoodoo, nor did I intend to return there. I wrote to Monaghan for the money that was due to me. I never said to Blaguire that 1 lived as a ser vam in the beinater Hotel, nor did I meet a servant who confronted me, and denied that I ever lived there. I never recollect to have given authority to Mr. Brie to write a letter respecting a disappoint ment at the coach-office. The letter further expressed a disap pointment at something not having been left for her. The Learned Counsel here read several lettets, which the Witte,/ deposed she bad not, to her recollection, given authority to any per son to write. The letters containcil a statement of the ex treme distress to which she was reduced, as she was obliged to pledge all her clothes. Since that period 1 have been living at a house of Lord West meeth's, in Roscommon, or at a house of Mr. Hogg, his agent. I received no money from Lord Westmeath, nor do I expect any. Lord 'Westmeath pays the allowance of 10s. a week to support illy father. I do nut know how long that allowance is to continue. The only money I received was that which was sufficient to defray my expenses to town. I never went with my husband to the office ISIr. Gerard, Lord Westmeath's proctor. I was at Mr. Ala.. guise's house in Paradise-row on Friday, but I did not see Maguire. It was not last week, but the week before, that Mr. Keegan called upon me. Henry Wm. Spinks examined.—l reside at Carlow. lam at present a farmer, but understand the dyeing business. I was at Holyhead in October. I there met Ferly. We lodged together. After a few days stay there, lie asked me if I had known anything of a law-suit pending between Lord and Lady Westmeath ?He said it was a case of a singular nature. This made me anxious to inquire into the circumstances of the case. He then told me that there was a quarrel between them—that there was a suit pending between them, which consisted in his Lordship requiring her Ladyship to show cause why she lilt him. (The witness here de. tailed the circumstances of the case in the Ecclesiastical Court, as stated by the Counsel for the prosecution.] Ferly further told me that he was a witness for Lady Westmeath, and that she was pre paring a defence which would ruin Lord N{'estoleath both in cha. meter and property. One of the charges against his Lordship was adultery with a woman named Nancy oEonnell, whom lie knew to be a woman living in Dublin by prostitution. He said he had three reasons for opposing Lord IVestmeatii—first, because he had been his servant for twelve years, and that he dismissed him, and injured hie character—secondly, he was well paid for his trouble and time—and, thirdly, Ids reason of hostility against Lord W. wiss that one of his ancestors, at the time of the Reformation, had destroyed the monastery of Ford. (Immense laughter.) Ferly further told me, that he expected, by means of this lawsuit, that Maguire would be in possession of Ins Lordship's domain. Ferly and 1 were intimate; we smoked a pipe often together ; we used to go to see the passengers land and embark. Ferly told me that Lady Westmeath was ,31. in his debt for his services, and he was to be paid in propnrtion for whatever future service he might reader. I spoke to Lord Westmeath on the subject of what 1 heard front Ferly. Lord Westmeath offended me very much, and told me if I hail any thing: to say in the business to go and communi cate it to his agent.-IThis witness underwent a long cross-exami. station, but nothing material transpired to shake his testimony.] Mary AI-Daniell examined by Mr. O'l'o NWT L L-1 know J. Monaghan ; he lived at Loed M estineath's house ; he wanted me to bear witness, and to go to Lady Westmeath ; I told him I never knew any thing improper of my Lord with any woman. Nancy Connell was named, but raid I knew no:hing improper between heiand my Lord. lle told me to come to Lady Westmeath, and that I would be provided for. Ferly spoke to me also on the sub. jeer: he said the same as Monaghan, " Come to Lady West niesea, and she will keep you up for ever." I replied, I would not go to perjure my poor soul in the latter end of my days, if I was to get the living that Lady Westmeath herself now enjoys.— Lillis witness was not cross-examined.] John Green examined—l have known Anne Connell these six year... I know Mr. Ferly and Monaghan. I saw them leaning against a ditch. I had a communication with Feely. They ob. served me. Feely left Monaghan and addressed me, " You are now long enough doing business for the Marquis of Westmeath, and you have got nothing for your trouble, but if you came now and help Anne Connell, you shall get 2001. for your trouble." 1 said I would not join in any such thing, and asked him how did he know what I got for my treuble ? He told me, " I was a d—d fool." and that if I would only go to England, I should certainly get the money. Cross-examined—l came from Westmeath last. My father was imprisoned. Mr. Ferly told me that Maguire was the occasion of it. He was put in gaol on a charge of riot. There was a censure thrown upon him on suspicion of robbing Lord Westmeath, but it was not proved. Ido not know who made the charge against him. klichael Hope was called to prove the hand-writing of Fcrly, but failed in identifying it.-1 know Anne Connell and John Monaghan. I heard him speak with respect to the part he took to. wards Lord Westmeath—Lord ‘Vestuteath asked me, " Why does Monaghan Persecute me ?" I said I did not know ; he de sired me to inquire. I did so, and asked Monaghan why he did so? 3lonaghan's observation was, " {Why does Lord Westmeath persecute me?" George Elridge—l am proprietor of the Leinster Hotel. in Fre derick-street. A servant of the name of Anne Connell never lived with me. Lord Westmeath often stopped with me. I will not swear that it is impossible for a woman to have been introduced to him without my knowledge. Colonel Osborne was next called, but it was ruled that his evi. deuce was not admissible, as he had heard part of the proceedings; and at the commencement of the trial a consent had been entered into that the witnesses on both sides should withdraw from Court. Colonel Osborne had not heard of this arrangement, and was pre sent from inadvertence. Mr. Thompson was re-called, and gave some further evidence on certain documents connected with the suit in the Consistorial Court. Richard Gray examined—l know Richard Bennet. I resided at TuUamore, in the queen's county. I saw him often there. He said the Marquis of Westmeath was wronged; that it was a d—d unpleasant business, and he wished he had had nothing to do with it. He owed me a small account, and said that he expected a re mittance shortly, with which he rmuld be able to discharge it. J. Egan examined—l live at Kilbiggin. I know Anne Connell. I recollect on one occasion she was ill. She asked me last March, when she was ill, to go for a Priest for her. I said I would go to the Minister for her, as I had seen her going to the church. I heard her say, on that occasion, " By the living George, I have wronged Lord Westmeath." Henry Barry was called to prove the hand-writing of A. Mackenzie, one of the traverser,. Several letters were here put in and read. They described slight differences which arose between the Marquis and Marchio ness of Westmeath. Some of them also referred to the proceed. ings In the suit pending in the Coneistory Court, and evinced the zeal and activity with which the agent. of the Marchioness welt prosecuting and forwarding her defensive allegation in that suit. After these documents were read, the Marquis of Westmeath was called. The Marquis of Westmeath examined by Mr. O'Cowsrixt—l never recollect to have seem the female traverser, Anne Connell, in my life. By virtue of my oath, I never had connection with bee— never had any conversation with her on such a subjec';-never ;tad any communication with her whatever, consequently never had a child by her—never gave her a written paper—never promised 1.51. • rear to her—never admitted her to Elridge's Hotel—and never pissed any time with her in a bed-room there or elsewhere. The Noble Marquis contradicted each allegation as the questions were put to him by Counsel, from the depositions. Cross-examined by Mr. WALLACE.—I know the neighbour hood of Castletowntlelsin very well. I do not recollect any one from Mulroe applying to me to swear a child to some person. I have heard that Anne Connell's family live there ; they live in a miserable cabin. I know a family of the name of Burke, because, when a youngster, I used to travel by the coach from their house, as it is an inn. I know a Jane Smith ; it has been alleged that I com mitted adultery in London with a woman of that name. I never knew any Jane Smith but the one who was my daughter's maid in London. Ido notrecollect any one of that name at Lady Glen gall's. I acknowledge to have had two illegitimate children be fore my ma:ritige by a person of the name of Irving. I can't tell precisely how long it is since Corcoran first communicated with ins on this subject. I forget when Margaret Shields communicated with me ; it must have been in October or November ISM. I hare those feelings that every man must have, who has been deeply wronged, end falsely accused. I have deep hostility to Bernard Maguire ; he was the attorney through whom I Marto psy 60001, to the trustees of her Ladyship. I owed the money, but the man ner of proceeding was harsh and oppressive. It was vexatiously dune, considering thcluarter from whenc.: it came. I have not a good opinion of Maguire. Iles rot the hostility to Maguire caused ibis mosecution ?—He, I believe, has been a means of getting We this plot against me ; and I appealed to the justice of my country. I w.v influenced by those feelings in getting up this prosects ion. A certain letter showed to hun COL= me ex tuom2imous latcs . The Noble Ilercitne .4* 1 J 6 -,,MOiIM• further said, that he woe only anxious foe the development of truth, and the vindication of his character. The case for the prosecution here closed. The defence will com. mence to-morrow, and is likely to occupy the whole of the day. The Court did not adjourn until ten o'clock at night. •.- - WESTMINSTER SESSIONS, TlittllDAY, JAN. 6. The noted el-decant Captain Patten, otherwise O'Hara, was tried on a charge of fraudulently passing a note for 101. of the Weald of Kent Bank, which stopped payment in 1814. The prisoner was found Guilty, and sentenced to seven years' trans portation. POLICE. GUILDHALL. A gentleman of the name of Pearce was brought before Mr. Al. derman Cox, yesterday, under the following circumstances : It appeared that Mr. Pearce had lately paid his addresses to • young lady named Paddle, who had, until within a short period. lived with 'his sister ; she was, however, taken sway by her brother in-law, Mr. King, residing in IV eil.yard, Little Britain, and very soon after Ilfr. Pearce was informed that Miss Priddle was excel livery iii, upon which Mr. Pearce made his appearance at the house of Mr. King, on Saturday last, and requested to see her, but mastoid she was not there. Ile called again on Monday, and saw Mrs. King, who said that her Riker was not there, and hers the cause of the present charge originated. It was stated by Jane Thompson, the servant of Mr. King, that an Monday morning, about 11 o'clock, she heard a knock at the slow, earl upon opening it, she saw a boy there ; however, the pri soner almost immediVely came tip and asked if Miss Paddle was theret"She said, " No.' He then rushed past her, went into the two parlours, and not being then satisfied, he ran up stairs and searched the upper part of the house, having sent the boy into the kitchen to see if Miss Priddle was there. Mr. Pearce, she con. tinued, using very gross language, saying, " Where is Mr. King ? I don't care for twenty Kings, neither did he care for blood or slaughter." Mr. Alderman Cox wished to know whether she knew that the prisoner was paying his addresses to Miss Pridd' ? IVitness had since heard that was the ease. Mr. Pearce had also called on the Saturday before to see her. The wife of Mr. King deposed to the same facts as the servant. Mr. Buthrx, Mr. Harmer's clerk, who attended for the pri soner, in the ewes-examination of the witnesses, elicited these facts, viz. that she was the sister to Miss Priddle. but dld not know of the attachment formed between the parties till very lately. Thomas M. King, in answer to a question from the worthy Al. derman, stated, that he most certainly went in bodily fear, and added, that last evening, according to appointment, he had gone to meet Mr. Pearce, and was locked up in a rooni with his sister dur. ing the period of the execution of the warrant by Hurdsfield, the officer; that the sister came to him and wanted him to come out of the room, saying, that her brother had nothing with him then with which he could hurt him ; he, however refused, until the of ficer had taken the prisoner away. Hurdsfield said that he had never experienced so much violence in his life as in the execution of this warrant; and he was certain that when Mr. King pointed out Mr. Pearce to him, as the person upon whom the warrant was to be served, had the prisoner been in I possession of the means, lie would most undoubtedly have commit ted some most serious injury on Mr. King; at last, when he got the prisoner into the street, and was getting him into a coach, he en deavoured to jump through the window. In this attempt he was defeated by the skirts of his coat being laid hold of by Hurdsfield. As they proceeded the father of the prisoner tried to excite a mob, which had collected, to a rescue, by saying that his son was being carried off without the least cause whatever—this was in Piccadilly. Mr. Alderman Cox said he should advise Hindsfield to apply to Sir K. Bimie upon that subject. Hurdsfield—Thank your Worship; I most certainly will. The prisoner, in his defence, said, that so far from having ran. sacked the house of Mrs. King, as stated, upon his not ap pearing satisfied as to the answer given him about Miss P.'s not being in the house, she bad told him he was at liberty to go over the house; this, however, lie at first refused, but finding from his feelings that he could not go away without more certainty respect. ing Miss P., lie quietly walked into the various rooms, wit ho ut uttering any of those expressions attributed to him. lie totally denied any violence towards the officer; but when lie wanted to put him into a coach he objected, and so far from bearing any ill will to Mr. K., he had never seen him before, and it was not probable he had any malice towards a man to whom be was a per fect stranger. That Mr. K. war averse to the match between himself end Miss Priddle he was aware ; but even that could not have been a sufficient inducement for such conduct as that imputed to him. Mr. Alderman Cox ordered him to find bail to keep the peace *cowards Mr. King, himself in 801., and two sureties in 401. each. HATTON-GARDEN. THE ROBBERY or JEWELL—Since the first examination of holland, for the robbery of jewels at the house of Thos. Downes, Esq., No. 31, Great James-street. Bedford-row, as stated in the papers of Tuesday last, some additional particulars have tran. spired, which are likely to lead to an elucidation of this mysterious transaction. On Wednesday night Mr. Downes, accompanied by Mr. J. S. Taylor, appeared before Mr. Laura to prefer some charge against a man named hip, who was found on that day at the prisoner Hol land's residence, 25, Hackney-road, under circumstances of a pe culiarly suspicious nature, and whom he (Mr. Downes) was inclined to consider as an accessary before the fact. The examination of this man was conducted in private, and luta for a considerable time--Read, the chief officer, and W. Lee, who took him into custody, being the principal witnesses. Ile was or dered for re-examination on Saturday. The cook, whose testimony was taken on Monday, in regard to the prisoner Holland's visit on Sunday, was then questioned very minutely as to her previous knowledge of him, and, at the conclu sion, Mr. Downes said, that he had subsequently obtained such information on the subject as authorised hitu in charging this wo man as an accomplice. Mr. Lat s o wished to know what was the nature of those grounds of suspicion ? Mr. Downes then replied, that he charged her on three distinct grounds:—the first was, that he had evidence to prove that she had 'missed two rights in Holland's room, when he (Holland) slept in the house; the second was, that she had connived at Holland's wife sleeping in the house, contrary to the known regulation of his (Mr. Downes's) establishment; and thirdly, that, upon her first examination, she had denied ever having seen or heard anything of Holland until the evening of the robbery (Sunday), whereas it could be proved that, on the preceding evening, she had been in his company for above an hour. She was then removed from the witness-box, and, being placed at the prisoner's bar, the Magistrate observed that, under the cir cumstances just stated by Mr. Downes, he felt authorised in re manding her for examination with the other prisoners. -feudal& Holland, the prisoner's reputed wife, was then examined (not on oath) as to her connection with him, &c., and prevaricated so materially that she was also remanded. The Magistrate observed, as it was necessary that all communi cation should be prevented between the parties, he should send them to different prisons, and the gaolers received strict orders not to suffer any intercourse whatever with them. Yesterday Mr. Downes and 51r. Taylor attended again, and two other persons were brought up for examination, the brother-in-law and sister of the prisoner Holland, who keep the house, No. 25, Hackney-road, where he resided at the period of the robbery. This examination was also taken in private, and, at the expiration of nearly an hour, they were both discharged. It is understood that the jewels stolen arc estimated at between 5,0001. and 6,0001. value. AIRY-LA-BONNE. Yesterday M.. hill,, pawnbroker, of Upper Rathbone-place, appeared on a summons, for having refused to deliver up a shawl to a female named Robinson, unless she paid more than the sum charged on the duplicate. Mrs. Robinson stated, that some time since she pawned a shawl at Mr. Hills's for Lls., and after it had remained in his possession three weeks, she went to redeem it, and tendered is., with the inte. rest ; but on the shawl being produced from the waremom, it was labelled with a duplicate charging 3s. as having been lent, and on consulting the entry in the books, that sum was found to have been entered. Knowing this to be incorrect, she positively refused to pay it, and reminded the pawnbroker that she had only received 2a., which was marked on the duplicate given her. She imd repeatedly applied for Iter ;haat, but the defendant refused to give it up unless she paid his demand. Therefore, to recover her property, she had adopted this course. Alr. Gnirrtzet, on examining the dupliatte, said, " Why this is a very good figure of 3, and it is much fairer than that generally written by pawnbrokers on duplicates." Mr. do assure you, sir, it is entirely a mistake. The woman received 35., and the shopman, in making out the ticket, made a mistake, and wrote on her ticket 2, and on the other one the aunt given. Mr. Gitirrtrzi—Oh, sir, this is very improbable, and you know it. Mr. Hills—lt may appear so to you, sir; but hero is my book to prove it. The article was immediately entered. Mr. °RIF r Frit—Don't tell me that. Your books are no ay'. , Lience for you. Mr. Ilills--Indeed, if that is your law, pawnbrokers may as well not keep books at all. Mr. OretIFFITH—You are stating, sir, that which is opposite to c nnmon sense, to tell me you gave a ticket for 2s. and paid 3s. It is net the fact. Mr. Hills—Oh, yes, it is. My shopman will swear it. Mr. GRIFFITH—Nu, sir, he shall not do anything of the kind, whatever you may wish on t hel subject. What !amlto be told a man will deny his handwriting? Mr. Hills —Why, sir, the books will prove it, u I said before. These mistakes often occur. Mr. Ontemu—l don't think so; and I do know that no man conducts his business so badly u you. Mr. Hills—You, air, cannot know anything of that kind; can conduct my butanes, with any man in Europe. Mr. Oilier IT If —You are a very ignorant man. Mr. Hills—No, lam not an ignorant man. I again repeat, this is a mistake, and you ought to look at my book. Mr. Gat reit u—No, sir; your book is no evidence. I believe this woman, and desire you to give her up the shawl on the pay. mein of the is. only, and the three weeLs' interest, as you cannot demand any front the time she offered you the money. Mr. Hills—l will attend to your directions, sir ; but rest as. stared the business originat.ll in mistake. 11:.(liturrrus made .49 reply : and the parties left the Once. V. __ ._. LAM INTELLIGENCE PREROGATIVE COURT, Tuaaspar, Jas. C. {Before Sir - Jong Nicnovi..) CAMIIAZO V. WROROTTO. In this case, as formerly reported, administration had been sough ; on behalf of the Marquis Cambiaso, Genoese nobleman, t o the goods and chattels of the deceased Mr. Negrotto, who had died !erratic. Before granting an administration on a former occasi on, the Court had expressed itself averse to permitting letter s o f 0. ministration to pass, without the parties applying entering into the usual security, viz double the amount of the property sought to b e administered. This was an application made on behalf of the Mat. quis Carnbiazo, that the Court would restrict the amount of security to those sums which were the property of the deceased lunatic, au under the control of the Court, viz. a stun of money now lying in* Court of Chancery. Dr. STOW/ART was this day heard in support of the applies. tion; and after enlarging upon the peculiar situation in which t h e property of foreigners was placed, as respecting the funds, of any interference in which the Legislature had, even in times of war, shown the greatest delicacy to meddle. the Learned Advotate said, the demanding security for the whole property in this cue would have the effect of causing a heavy tax on the property, as it would not be possible to procure persons in this country t o justify, as orcziriel, without :pitying a premium of live, and pro bably ten per cent. This, he contended, would be a great hard. ship ; and he prayed that the security would be permitted to be , taken in Genoa before the Consul, or other competent authorities, where the respectability of the parties applying for the ads inistra. tion might be known. Dr. LUSIIINGTOW followed on the mine side, and said that the statute of Charles 11., respecting administrations, did not apply to foreigners dying *brad (which war the cam here), though it might apply to the ease of foreigners dying in England. He emended that there 11114 no other person entitled, or applying, to obtain ad. ministration ; and that, from the practice of the law of Genoa, all the property and matters respecting it would be decided there by its own laws, and not the law of England. This was always the rase, except where there are foreign attachments. In this ease there writ not any attachment or any lieu whatever, on the property in the Court of Chancery to make it necessary for this Court to adhere strictly to its rule,, the effect of which would be of the almost penal nature described by his Learned Friend; the general rule in cases respecting personal property were to be governed by the l er loci domieiiii , the principles of which applied to this case. The Learned Advocate concluded by praying the Court would grunt de administration in the way prayed for, or permit the ball to justilps Genoa. Sir J. '.l lc NOLL said that the question was one of much Import. snce; that hetwould take home the different papers in the cause, and give judgment on an early day. Letters of administration were granted in the goods of Hem Doddendge, who died on the Vol of May, 1824, and of Anger() Parmegiano, a foreigner, who died on the sth of September last. ts butler in the service of the Duke of St. Alban's. There had beta ' no executor or rendering legatee appointed by the deceased, and 'IT nand notice calling on the next skin. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. TATTERSALL'S, JAN. 6. The Room was well attended today, and some business wa done. For the St. Leger, Cleveland has gone back, and 31emne. again become first favourite. The odds on the Derby and Osu have not experienced any material change. DERRY. tle to 1 apt Muleteet 25 to 1 apt Diana (taken) 10 to 1 apt Ruh, 25 to 1 apt Nigel 13 to 1 apt Webb 26 to I apt 51acduff 14 to 1 apt D. of York's colt 25 to 1 agst Bohan ;a 17 to 1 apt Bolero 25 to 1 apt Sister to Nectar 20 to 1 apt Canvas 30 to I agst Jenny 20 to 1 apt Legacy 30 to 1 agst Harriet OAI 9. 5 to 1 apt Aline 10 to 1 apt Attica 8 to 1 agst Sorcery 13 to 1 apt First Fly 9 to 1 apt Waltz ST. LI 11 to 1 apt Memnon 12 to 1 apt Cleveland 14 to 1 apt Redgauntlet 22 to 1 agat Cow Boy 22 to I apt Homer 25 to 1 apt Crowcateher :GEL 30 to 1 apt Ilia Grace 30 to I apt Mandane 30 to 1 apt Androgens 30 to 1 apt Mule,eer 40 to 1 apt Rosamond 40 to 1 apt The Alderman. YOEK SPRING ➢IEETING. 11125. For the Handicap Stakes, for four-year olds, 0 Subscribers-. Sweepstakes of 20 Boss each, all ages, subs—Sweepstakes it three-year 01d5,•9 subs.—Spring SL Leger. 9 subs—Filly Stake. 8 subs.—The Shorts, 3 subs.—Gold Cup, 11 subs.—Two-year ad Stake, 14 subs.—Constitution Stakes, 15 sub:. YORK AUGUST MEETING, 1825. The Great Yorkshire Stakes, 7 subs.—The two-sear nld Stab's 16 subs—Filly Stakes, 11 subs.—The Thirty SoveTeigns Sakes, 27 subs. DONCASTER. 1825. Doncaster Club Champagne Stakes, 31 subs.—The four-year old Stakes, 8 subs—Doncaster Club Stakes, 5 sobs.—Osseo gne Stakes, 9 subs.—Filly Stakes, 20 subs.—The 2-rear old Stakes, :11 sub.—Thirty Son. Stakes, for three-year olds, 26 subscribers. On Monday the East Sussex fox-hounds met at Clayton Holt. There was a capital &id of sportsmen, there heins upwards of ISO horsemen prevent. The hounds threw off at II eydown Bill, near Clayton Hill, and almost immediately unkennelled a for After a short but brilliant burst, the hounds ran in at killed hin in tine style, near Clayton Holt. A second fox was soon after watt found near the foot of the hill. Reynard made first towards Keyme, at a rapid pace; from thence he made for Friar's Ord:. At fins the greater part of the sportsmen, with all due precaution, managed to keep in his wake; but by the time he reached Friar'a Oak not more than about half a dozen horsemen were able to keep with the bounds, owing to the heaviness of the country, from the late it. catmint rains. After leaving Friar's Oak, the fox made to Hine, leaving Palms' to the right ; from thence across the Cticktield tad, near Clayton Hill. In this distance it is impossitle to convey cy idea of the state of the country ; it was with much difficulty th' few remaining horsemen, with " horses panting and robbing,' could keep with the hounds. The fox now dashed through Claroa Holt, over the hills by Standean—skirted t he north side o f the Earl of Chichester's Park, to Mary's Farm, through Stortmer Park —leaped the wall at Palmer—when the hounds ran in and kiEed him, after a sapital burst of one hour and thirty minutes. withea a check, being one of the best runs of the season. Duot.—A meeting took place on Tuesday on Meet Heath race-course, between a Mr. Micklewhit and Lint. Yearns, now or late of the 3311 regiment, in consequence pi' a quarrel at a hunt meeting at Ilagshot on the preceding day. The altercation produced an exchange of blows et the time, when the meeting was appointed. In the fair fire Mr. Yearns was wounded in the fleshy part of the arm, which was bound up, and he was conveyed to Sunning hill, weak from the loss of blood, but it is said there is no danger. A Popcorns:4 FEAT.—The crossing of the different bridges within a certain period of time, has very frequently attracted the attention of those pedestrians who, indepen dently of their professional skill, pride themselves on a knowledge of the short cuts, alleys, ice. throughout the metropolis. On Wednesday last a bet, upon which a coo , sidtrable sum of money is pending, was made at the Whits Swan, Doctors'-Commons, that the young man, beter known by the name of the China-man, and who has al- ready been tried in this effort (merely walking de ground), shall run this curious serpentine ground within •5 minutes. He starts on Sunday morning at a quarter put seven, from the Surrey side of Vauxhall bridge. His destined route is as follows: —gross Vauxhall briagt; along Milbank to Westinlister-bridge, cross the bridge. along Pedlar's-acre to the steps of Waterloo-bridge, cams into the Strand, through the Temple to Illackfrirss-bridce, cross to the Burley ride, along the wharfs extending from thence to Southwark-bridge, from thence along Thames street to London-bridge, and then cross London-bridge to the Borough side. Notwithstanding the fame of the Chi na-man, betting (taking into consideration the ur.cert:in state of the weather) is 6 to 4 against him. MARRIED. On Wednesday, at Kensington, Alexander Forsyth, Esc. e; Buenos Ayres. to Hannah Isabella, youngest daughter of the Alexander Smith, formerly of Aberdeen. On Tuesday, at St. Jllartin's Church, Birmingham, the Rev. 'tlatthew Davies, M.A. of lack. Salop, to Hannah, daughter of John Linwood, Esq. of the former place. Tuesday, at Hereford, John Sherburne, Esq. of that cf . tty. Mary-Ann, eldest daughter of Edward Beavan, Esq. of liuyo:!• Hsrefonlshire. DIED. On IWedncaday. at her bourn in Duchesy-street, Porfiand.Placc, Mn. Mary Novell, a: a very advanced age. 3121148 At nnP lian sell."erl if ie r .s . ead vi.e ilqa a tt. y hiei gi ohtwh m orning,auy tilt. 1' .a g edi c, Dunn, irooo ', l .v e ? y e . i ! rs l a ' n es atne t ,d, u Cliff, raw i f f l rea r iftht),fe Th e founder .t' the Charity School in the Sea-town there toe the «.oa• Lion of poet children. On Monday night, at Chialehurst, the Rigat Hon. Lady 1127 fling. _ IlltHi WATER THIS DAY AT LONDOS BRIIPOIL \ Morning 3?, min. after 3. I Afternoon It Nana afro , Printed at THE BRITISH PRESS Office, by J. Wearier [ 181 : Strand, and published by R. VAX 119 X, fiat ilbce• . • VINIMI ., " --- -. , •-- - V .....--r-S. f'. - s - . 1 lt# 6 a ' • R.