The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-09-08 00:00:00

(.o+l+ll2llles lead sot coat ■p + they would ►are killed tLe "Hirer. The Officer corroborated this statement, and declared it ita,, his isteutioo to iodic& Mr. Rutledge at the &salon' fur the The Worthy Magistrate recommended them to retire anal tattle their didireuees, which they complied with, but soon ret u nice" greatcr enemies soul more vociferous than over. Mr. Afarritiais SCJIOLVY declined interfering any (indict. The parties %I ere at liberty to bring thus. ilia:lent ems, F.:mints ta•Ciri• the Giaiad Jury. He accwiliugly msrti, td thews and I heir charges. CORNWALL 4151ZES. Tiomrstirtte e. HARRIS AND ANOTHER. T11:11 .I% an action imainst Mfr. Harris, the 'tido.* of late Her. William Harris, of lieneggy. and Mi. John Beard, :kr brother, for puldit.hin4 a libel, in the form of au eflillavit, to ide by said Mn.i Morris, and her sister, Miss Elizabeth Beard. &Oast the Pi 'if; to which the Defendants pleaded their geneitil issue—not guilty. It was proved that the libel had been publooied by Mr.. Dorris and by Mr. Beard, each separately, but not Om it had been pialislied by them jointly, and the Plaintiff was therefore obliged to make his Are taun against which of the Defendants he would pee s:suit ; he elected to proceed aping!. Mr. Beard •oly, and it appeared that he had nut received any specific iujnrv, by reason of the puhlishitnt of the libel by the Defendant Mr. Brard.—Verdict for the PLisitiff. 40s. damages. Oa summing up the evidence to the Jury. the Learned Jwige, Mr. Jusice Ball•Flf, expressed himself as follows Gentlemen of the Jury.—T4tre are three ques tion,* is this case for your consideration. Plain tiff lias acted in the fairest manner. and in the way best calculated to support his character by omitting Misselleard. Plaintiff brings the action. and gives Mrs. Harris an opportunity of stating on the record, that the paper is true; and does not join Miss Beard. by which he gives tier an opportunity of calling Mies Beard, and provinf, by her testimony. that the fact' contained in it were true. You may therefore lay out of the case the truth of the facts in that piper. . . . . . The 'affidavit made by the Plaintiff is not stated. It was competent to Defendant. to have clone it, and thereby uncle it material : but whatever it might have cootaiived. it would not have wars:.n:erl Mrs. Harris to publisbing her affidavit. The de claration import. that the rneauin4 of the libel was to impute to she Plasma. th.t he loi.l toi.repte- Grated the circumstances of the robi l ery to Mr. Banns. Toe Jou here commented on the affidavit. and the words" a datuti'd trick."] If this was ootbinz but true, what right had Mr. Harris. in C 0.1 1 ,11. it line, upon this letter, to say that it was "• d '1 trick." Tur libel therefore phelfll. that th • meaning Mrs. Harris fueling to it. ff pole was, that Plainti repreaesite.l he liad been robbed, and that it was a mere fabrication. • Mr. Arundel) vm is said toilette weed tier words .• little tasenl:' Thew. words must I.r intended to impute dishonesty, and that the robbery *as • mei , cation. This is for von to consider-1 Plaintiff bad 'really the 7001. an.l had been robbed, I.e would am have been liable to repay it. unless it hid appeared to a Jury that he hod lweto guilty of Bow negligent r. The affidavits further it its Mr. arrie to hat e sin! 4. what eau I do ? If I ntalie him Kiley it lo tweilie will he ensued." Greta etrere bean laid upon theae words by the Defendants counsel, as if they qualified the inein;tig. and •• if Mr. Hawes thought be had been robbed, at:d that if he tirade hint pay it, it would h.....tt lii• own money. I cannot ezortly till v.,ist iiijAht, br his meaning, if he used the-e surds; 1 +agree theY create • little ddScull its the meaning put tivois this •letter. VO4l will consider whether t;:r fair meaning is net srlt*t them:eta itritsitted. VIZ. %%holier it teas not that the rubbery was not committee,. • kttrr was lying no the table, and tietLr after. wardsappennal, and therefore Ite concludes that he carried it away. The airtstion to the affidavit by Mios Bear I is mAtori .1, blcatt , e it shove that if I.):fess lams could base felt this was true, she was a com pete:lt wanes.; who could priv.e it, and tiler...- Uwe not callun4 husr is 4 unroog fuct aulsisist the - fendaisto. Next question is. whethor the publiu.a.lous of '24th Auga.t was a pu!dication which had the a 'nelson or concurrence of %Ins. II vela ? joint poblicatton is proved, Plaintiff has a right to talt• tale verdict egotist Mrs., Morris Or Mr. Beard: neither is answerable for thus putslicaion by tit e other. wafts the publication by 13.mA had Mr'. Mama's simelion. The publication of 20th Aug might have been presumed as a separate publica tion by Mrs. Rims, because she put Beard unto a situation to dioeittinste il.e contents of the 1.3;1tr ; but they are not liable for it jointly without gust maacurreoce. The damages ahoul.l b e to the itopression mode as Close who ;word it ; If she bad pot the libel into Beard's pc...session, tli..t be might 'hell it to whom he would. esery strus. of it afterwards by Beard would hare burn her act ; bat without this she is not ausw. ra'ole for 15... stets. We are left in the dark a'. to this—Ma:mull bas given no evidessce th it it huol her 'auction sod concurrence; therefore, unless y nu can infer it. that publication is not a Joint ouse.—lleard di.' not cott ers,. in the publucotion to Price ; therefore the tar. prolusion bade on him miss? now lw left out of tt..- question.. It is unnecessary to enmaie•.t n Harries letter. for that was an iict iu of-i.:!) Beard did not concur. If both could have bean inipticat eth that letter would have increased the damages ; became her putting it upon the truth. and not dar iag to put the truth in issue, by callutig her sister, it ought to have increased the damages. But as Beard did not coucur in that puhlication, and Beard is selected. at must be laid oust of the question. The damages should he such as you think ought to result from the impression made on the mind of Mr. Michelle. Toe pohlicatiose to Oznaro may ahm be laid nut of the questions es that does not appear to have been voluntary on Beard's part. Then the question is, what damages the Plaintiff is eult:th.,l to receive for the impreviiin made he Mr. Filch:um? 'Lichens conti 111 l rd to em ploy Plaintiff from that Inn.• to the present ; there. lore. *hooch at the time it might create a d-soSt and anspirio t, it scrims to have berm dote away by his coutioning to ent i oley hull. Papers of this kind are eeruioly calmul•ted to make an illorr.o.ro h an ilia mini, if YO'l ••elsr.it .Or is. It is Out ellteht:Al fur the Plaintiff's character that you thoold give high damages. The bringing the paver forward. and giving an oppoitulitv to try the fact.is proof th.t the libel had no foundati .... ; and PlAtotiff ought to go fron t hence.. nith the impression on every one's mind. that the libel haJ tin ground to afect lum, &art' doe,, not altpeer to be the firt.t innvvr, 1441 nmMY !we beets duntd by Mrs. 1-1.4m4. act' have be.ieve.l that wild she representvi haJ sollll * itiltildlitloll in it. Verdict fur the Plato' iff against Beard.—Da- In re. es 40.. .1 r B mention. for Mr: Tronen !were% sAto,f4etints, that it he ba.l proceeded vg Mr.. llama, the damage* ought to•have been touch lar;.;er. LCUT ra G.ar: I' re EX rIttuRDINARY. SLONDAY. 11Alt1.11 1), 1310. GENERAL ORDERS. RY THE RIGHT HON. THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL. Fort St. George, March 3, IR In. The following eatritta of lettr 7 r; front the Hon. the Court of Direetera to the lion. the Governor in Council, dated the 15th and :291h of September. 1809, ore EPTEALT OF A LETTER FROM THF. HON. THE COURT OF DIRFCTOM. DATED Isrit .EPT. 1809. Pare. 4. We have receivei your letters of the t2Oth and 31st January, 31 and 14th February. I$01), together with their several inelosurrs, sod we view with the deepest concern the transactions thus brought ander our consideration. 3. - We have ut all timer entertained a just reuse of the merits and services of the Officers of our Arnav, and have take., every proper op9ortunity to Matee that sense, and our consequent regard and attachment to their in.ere.u.. 4. or tivs habitual and deep looted sentiment, we had repeatedly triven the most ti. , ftplieucal proofs, and particularly in our late ins.' ortiolis to our Goveruineut ahre.al. in support .11 ite fair pit!- tensions of our o:licer. its of honour and com mand-; thus entle.tvourilo , to voider the periods o f thri, !it India h , th honourable and silvan tageioa ; ahil a t the a m ple provision made for their r lire to. of in Europe, at an imin-mie and indefinite expen.o, afford+ au ins two of the regard and li bera!•ty of their etnplover”, mot to he paralleled in cue outer service. In aid of this bat-mentioned oh- jret, yr have very recently (in mn4w,r to vomit of the List dogutthev t.. Machav Hod livisiol) wade liberal rlo••ationv to ti.• funds evtablishe 1 at those Prroi demi•-• for the MtIIIIPIIIIIICC o ,,_ d vo/e)ort of tbs . termed Officer*. 11 cot wove*, and fanosties. 3. bow, Ter. or are tbi• attentive, on the one hand, from sentiments not of justice and li berality only. ~nt of *ttochtnent and avian 10 the iiitcrests pretesminne of nor offi , e , s : we must nut. on the othrr hand, lose sight 1.1 the 1.,c -eessity pararthsisist duty inflamed upon us, of roppoiting the authority of the Government tai.der which that* officer's rem.. 6 rite *uppeirt of the annreme authority of nor eieverdl Governments in India i* cssent;4l to the preowi Talton of those Governments, to the forint... fiance of civil order, to the protection of *oriel) , and even to Ilia well-being and existence of the army itswlr. 7. We are sit all fifties desirous to pay due regard to Cie representations of our officers, and extremely unwilling t o impute censurable or unworthy mu- Pvt.,' to any of their acti.ms ; lust it is impossAde for us to consider th-ir conduct, in the transact $ now brought hefor.- us, otherwise than as highly improper 1,11:1 ii• 8. 11 Sr •e ire from the p triers now brought nnder our coin:trier:ohm, that ationt the month of Jmie, 1807, your Qctart..r.ll.lstei-G nrral„ Munro, iu olted.ene - to ordert.i.f our then Com mender-in-Clio r rid George, Sir J.Cialock (which ~rd-r. wer- clonniinie4terl to the Quarter- Mister-G-nerAt, by a triter of th e 7t t of Fehrunry, marked private and sulunittrd to h s clinderation, and •p:ir PM a psocr, porportin4 to be s plan for the Provision of lent.. and the cm.- t•n! tents and stores of native corp. ; w Lich attach , h.el born .upplied by a con:rart Commanding OlELers of those corps re spectiiely. 9. This pier was slon afterwsr3. lai.l h-fcre the Governor iu Celincili by Sir John Crarek, who wily., in the tttttt ute whirl) ist:: - ornp.mie.l it, that " it would he sup. rflionis in the extreme to urge at any lentr ' ih the validity of the aretunt nts set forth iu theQuarter-Alsster-General's Report, is. he might say they conveyed the refiiit of their . i.. t at m g, e t iwus upon the •ulijert, mud were the issue of that experience whicis arose from their re. -pet. love sintatiwn." It approved by ;11r. Petne. then President, whn observed in his ttttt inte. on ente.tilerii, l4 that paper, t'lat the nt.ult of mine of the sratrinents which he It td delivered in 160.4 when hr oppose.' the opini tas of General Snw. who "itrougnt forward the measure of the Ten Co.t trot a, had brew, by the e•perience of past years, as the appreltei,i:ei+ hr expe:'sited, that both the pnblie and indati.:uals soul•I sager by that arranzestienr. In. The plan. KO lipllforcii, was, together wi'h the report which stated the groomt of it r tel t,. t h e Government or th-opo ; and, lo !Li,: re turned with their complete arproliatam and 'mu tton. was a•lopitd by t' e Geite7ninviit of Purl Si. George, mod tat in Cnii+etilleibee plliallehtti to the army, and carried into effect in MI% lAOI. 11. On the lath cf Sept. Ihni, a charge woe transmitted to the hen 1-. pi irters of the army n4aiiist Lieut.-Colonel Munro, signed by the Officer. then in con3tuatid of tire regiments of Native Cavalr, and 2.1 butttalimm of Native Infantry. fur conduct unbecoming the character of an Officer and a demist. in having. in his propo.e4 plan for the ails:, linos* of the Tent Contract. lately held by Officer. commanding Native COfikS. ma:le SIPP of false a Id infamots in.inuattrio% thereby tending to injorr their character as Officers. and otherwise injurious to their reputations as Gentlemen ;" and upon this charge. Lieut.-Colonel Munro aa., on the 20th J.noisary ISI4. ordered into a:rest by Litut.-Gene ral I 2. Ti.e 'cr thus preferre.l suzainst the Quer ter-‘ll.ter-Gener.l. aplwar% to !: t.e I.ren fottlithil expa .... 1 ., 1 ., i s; . ye t , ..t, who h had re ill the •utho-• ' r...e• I- 1 .1 ••, :e 1. • opine it. Ad inittitig for a tivnitent, that theta eepreAohs had been exteptiolable, deference to those authorities ought to hare impured forbearance.—Otheers who thought themselves aggrieved by them, were it liberty to adopt A hue of comlact which might have sfrord,ll Altus ate upporturriry of rigid eating their own ii ii,idoal char4orn, without trr i mriitig 6 43 ,u their respect 14r wince authorities which they were buirnd to nivy. 13. It any Ctific.-r thou:Ott himielf ii:ltided to or agg.iikui by any thing that Col. Munro hnd sa:d, he might eitei;y have repelled the snip -Hod aisputa lion b•: deniJudiug that, it he were vitapecied, hi rlwnld lit brought to trial upon it. (join ritairu; he n rinser have granted a Court- ILI .1" at‘u d hove .d&• laity and publicly declared that au imputation rr►+rd upon each Officrt. 14. Ea. h Officer would have hat aii undoubted right to have densandtel such a clear ance, or trial for hiante:f ; but au Officer in cum. or out p.irtiettiar cocoa caunot. in the it dare undertake to answer for the conduct of an officer in c sssss mama of another corps, far re inore.l, perhapr. from his possihile ohserratiusi, much fur a %bolt bialy ail such otTicers so eirCUIII. stanced. 15. The character of each individual must be distinct and partielihr ; and a c Windt tttt t there -10;e, of wally °dicers to repel insinuations (sup• ptuntig s.i..it to hare• been advanced) 'leftist nu onlividuals of heir body or class, respect. tug n i t Sc, CO/MUM the periani.l knowledge or the 11.•:nli-rii generally of that Ludy could nut enable t.i spell:. does not seem to be founded iu any priwirle of. equity ; nor would it be justified by all fling that general histuu•ttinns against the whole bodt slamming to no Oth,,er by name, (mild no t be met in any miser manner: for the obvious course to be follaweil in that case would still lie, that every ind•vn h tal Officer who conceived his chi rat ter to se brunt:lit into question should (Lair, to Lave his uwis cooduet separately investigated. Hi. But we are the snore astonished at their pro retoil.l4, when we consider the expressions which hove been assigned as the ground of the charge.— t iched as they have been from tit/it context, they still appear to us to be coached in the usual stile of official discussion. and to lie as fir from con veying auy iinpot•lisrm signing individual characters, as the intasires of Sir John Crailock 11111 i Mr. Petrie, by which the plan was supported. But when they are coussilere,l as they actually stand in the paper' prepare f by Colon. t Jlnnro, focusing a part of the chain of reas•suiog upon general principles, it ap•trsrs to us th it no inference can fairly be dram from theta unfavourable to the character of th e ;11.1dras army. I 17. While, therefore. we cindemn the conduct •of the Officers who preferred this charge, we ap priove of the terms to walea you have stated your o f .imon of the groutels of it iu your General Orders of the lith of February. ft was a proper attention to their feelings. sill more to the feelings of • Ow,. Officer s . w heel nu thine in that irregular and ; is -li:heists. piroce , ,d•ng, to declere in a public do. *lilt co injurious imputations upon their pc:•v tins C01141:1:•Z, Wt.f.• CollCellied 10y the Guvernor ' tit (.moil, to hare berm iiitended so the report cf Colonel \loom. IS. N e cannot dismiss this part of the subject without observing. that the circumet aliens of the case lie fore us involve a nuestiou of floe gieatest itu . patience—the claim of iiiihrobials who may think them...elves attvieved toy the opinions or frilel.llolll9 of a;s 016 er of the Goterninent.cotninunicated by hint in obediences to the eirdeis of his superiors, and in the d scoarge of his duty. Sc terilig such Officers to trial I.r t:.os e cimiinuoicat• . If per loolihng responsible situations were stile e%pll,cd 10 Cm. vesatiou and ignominy Si pahlic tiial. wheneves they in.,. in the discharge of their rofieial duties, have delivered opinions ad verse to it): erste amts, or teen the interest of any part of the 'entre, it will be impossible for such persona 10 de their duty to the public in any instance wh:cli may 'Portiere a ills these sentiments or into. rests; er to giie upon nay question, a fair and honest op Mini, if that opiuiuu tsar, by inference or con ; strained spittle:4ton, be construed iuto a criminal ' i , ..iiisiatioli sgaiest the character and conduct of in dividuals. if such a claim could be maintained—if the pract.i e which it iuctileates were to prevail—it would put ins end at once to all official confidence. mid leave the Governmeut *nitwit the memos of ob taining information respecting existing error., de - feet% or abaft.. or of forming 'flans for I:le correction of auy arrangenieuts which have a tendency to pro duce them. We thought it necessary tootate these principles generally and broadly, because we are deeply impre.-ed with a sense of their tr•th and importance. With respect to the particular case of Lieut.-Col. )lour., it rosy he sits-erv; d. t h at the communication was not i cily official ltlit colifelen. tail—its insertion in the records of 4;w...reorient was no act of Ili., but the act of the Ceminsioiler. its-Cteief. By whit mem o s the paper he amt. pub lie, we h .ve uo authentic seiformation: Ho reason vituttever 11.1.1 appeared for supposing that its puoG city waf o.lllg to the quarter-Master-General. Were we acipilioteel witn the channel through whien it became public, rod was afterwards circu lated through the thfferent stations of the army, at the psoseili!e 11..vird (thou,th we trust not with the direct of creating discontent, we should hick it nece--try to mirk touch a breach of coofidente with our lit2h disapproleation. .it,. It further, from the 30th paragraph of your ',dui , of the 39th January. lon% that the " 011ie -r. who load preferred the charges against the crier-Nlaster-General of the army, had, in cons•Ote•iire of the declared sentiments of the Judge-Advocate-Getiertl regarding then illez.slity, reept-oed thu the Cuminimden-in-Chief would sus. pend the proseefetio n of them." We are induced, from this stater nwes s, to iiiiloilge ■ hope that the Officers &i.o had gist a 1.1 those charges against the Quarter-Nla.ter-G.-neral. hail become sensible of the iinforopriety of haviteg preferred them; and this considerate ~,., if it should turn out to he well found ed, may relieve us from the disagreeable necessity of filosig further notice of their misconduct in. this 111.14.0._ it. !laving entisigl•re4 the procee ling or the er. w l.n profs rreri Vie rhugro orlon Lieut.- Col. Munro ; nnw to notice the conduct of Lieu r.-Gener..l %twangs'', our :ate Coon .ninoter. in-Chief bt Furt St. George, in triaition to t:.is Raitieb Lottery ickm Colo foe T. 81 4 11, Stock 4, Conduit, sea% BIRTHS. At Hill-Plortsr, Esaro►th, *Pax, the Cimphelt, Esa. R N. of a •.m. In Orchard.•treet, Mt-tuna's...ware, the Cold>traani Guards, of • dittabler. I/LAfII. At Alai rarenny, Wm Ferdinand 'limbo late of the 17th re4,intc,,t of foot HIGH WATrIt. THIS DAv, VOA Wm. MI lam. oall.r e I F.ro. 3; ir I.ANDON --Printrd 111 C SMITH, 7io re1Y,.1.c.1111 v,. Back a ( st , ind J IV!!! 1 r .I some Our POP.T.;mi ll I li ~ Amer.)ri the Hornet A Wel 1. WI 1. ' ''.- '. paienes relative ii. Ihe titilorio,, • t .. ,•. 1.4. , i . :' ''s. Mose& %loop of war auto the J . ... . ,i . :".• .• ' ; e t' :::Y r . ri e u s l i J . ll t e r b h l a r (l i r , g o a r e r m s r:i t r a a l ti l a a.:tit ' o l . t i 1 ., i : d i : 1 4 - 1 t . e . t .63 • (101 l ' et... . : ....: '-'l. 'i i ii • ••.l. iii r. . -- C `i Constuissiouer Puget oi, liooril for Alad ''')."„,4,Lth to Sr. lielriell 111.6.611 • ra''' actor--• ortvogi the %owl his „ roi A lit r d itt t . : , ;li t6 e e N ii k , V o . :tia ettia bhip, funn t ' . l . 4 ;e ( t - 5 : t, : Pasted y 5 , of the °port, • io by' • • .I,i i PIA 51131; fli I) r; ,-„, Arrived th- sci !,. Capt. ihil,ill* " .' :4 s , , 114..I 14.. 11 i • ott th ile e freh i ~.,s, ; a ilk the Morro:sat II . 1 ' lit , ', I key curl Polle, front T „., eiteritre, for 1.0 4. " - , 4i l a k .. --' by u Fr:tieii priiiiteer, witch - 'bei:kj, mh.l , 11;• (liken by ti.e Seibe. Skiird the .1. r orriston h;red t u rne d bnz, 1115- et - m . oy Ih . lei .• 11 1* 1 • fur So , wires ; Nair/ape- h I • .i er, for ...ilde Ro.itts: Ali:a anti Jone letii.icr ...l . ; Lurk ; au .: I:4e Arno ti oder, for Klis. o l . ''. glICU::11:11::.:1C11011"::::aut the glo6cs, c l ' o ° 6 ll.f.' i ;'. ii '::.. h• DEAL, ILA 6 ~ Arrt •al several ships from the Kiser, aim iri..' Arrived mid willed for tile Were, si sh . n. i ji:!..''' 1 I f lieJfierl , aisrl the Tiro Alin's, (rota 0 , 411 the John Sr.iiit irmeriffe, itotil llie Stif ' I' "' . 4/;: from 119, tiuitiue.-Witul N . . rk,. N'. I a...-.z.. - ..;._. - ..,...,„..,as ~ hie 1 JutsTS. • • CORN EXCHANGE, Sser.7. CL'alle:NT PRICE OF GRAIN. Wheat 7 5 ,, 9,,,, Inns Beans ........... sag -k Fine ditto .. ..... los, 11..1 Tick ditto - ........ 44s • A Rye. Seed ......... ;..i. j Barley 34. 444 F4 8 111•41d1D4 .....,,,,,, ~, Malt ; Je. FAO I Potato/ il,tio ..... .....js (Shoe Peas 1 • (b.olats; S' •••• 4U.• I Fibs 110111 •.. . Grey Peas ..... UXBRIDGE. CuritArispectoe• F:tl.4nl, TIII.34IDAT, ate' A. Wheat, per load. (MI. -4. to •, , y!.-.. Barley, per emartee ta5...4. to rtia -4. • Oaks •,es. -41. to CAL -a. Bess. ~ so. -4. to 622.-4. Old Ditto .... Peas .Gus. -.1. to 6311.-4. .1 -- -- -- • NMI OP MOPS. •4•s. roglitis. Kest. 41. .4. to SI. Ists• Kest, 41. toa sir Same:, al. Isa. to sl. M. Seem 31. tae. bit.* Essex. AI. DS. to 51. ea. Fandiamol. es. oink m Old Duty laid at 90,00n1. • ..-__ SMITHFIELD, SEPT. 7. ___. To sink the offal, per tonic of sib. 8eef......m. it& to sa 44. Heeded Cattle, this 194, . • Maten...4a. ed. Is 56. 44 i1 , iat5........ ....... .0i Lamb.... 4s. et tw Qs. ed. Sheep and Lambs.- 344 h Veil se. udi. us 7s. O. I Cave , Its . , Pink 3S. 04.1075 mi. Pat IA 1. HAY-MARKUS. , I 111 v "SI. el. rai to tot es. od. Si( .I ft..... ..21. 103. 4.1. IA 31. AO 54. elterer 6l. TO.. 41. in 101 IDS ad I- . , NEDWATE AND LEADENII4I.I. MAI:KE,'I's. (By the Corrs , r ) Beef a. od. to 56. od. I red 4s. 94. is St. 41 r= Ma 4s. at. to ss. ad Pork in. .1. is 7s. M Lamb - - so. od. to Oa. 44. '' . PRICK OF RAY AWD STRAW YESTERDAY. 1 ST./ 4441111 . 11. WIII ...... it. H 2 ) 51 .1 44 ad. to t01.104.0d. Hay 01. es. ts is:. • . Strims,2l.l7cod. WM. ps ed. New, el. es. mi ii. a IClover, eh 44 1.151. is kitraw, el. iss.. to 3. 4 RAW HIDES Best Heifers sad Steers (per (A-diary is. 011. to el- of stunt; ot.ct to 31. od. Market Calf IS'. ed. rid Middlings its 4d. to RA Gd. El4l/ H0,111156.0d. 14 is. id kbearliocs - - - is. 6d to - - Lamb Skims - - - - 3•. aid. to 39. 34 . PRICE OF TALLOW. St. James's Market a old I TowaTalkur yns 64 -19 Clare Market is id I Yellow Rlllllllll 705.4 7111 Mbitechapel Market 44 id White ditto .. Ws od 07 , • Per s 4. of elk. ---- Soap ditto.... &is ud 4;11 ISa aid Melling Staff 6.4 cd -a 4 1 10 9 Average.... as id CDuitatroe.rougli 421 04 ..4 6 Good Drees lll 4 Yellow 8•440,90,--Maillkd Inns-Curl, 1044 Price of Csadles, per doses, igs 6.1-Moulds, :30 od , COAL MASK ET, Sir( 7. Ships. Skips gold. Price. - 39 Neweastl- Coal 311.,.., 476. 6a. to 59• e • a Sunderlauil 365. .4. to -i .. 4 11 Cinders - r COURSE of EXCHANGE, FRIDAY, Ste t 5. i Aratirdsm.... 33 •4U. I Oporto • Ditto at Sight .. 33 9 ItioJaaeiro...• 7 5 Rotterdam .... to .. g V. I Malta Hambergh.... 31 0 911•. Gibraltar 3l Alton. 3l 1 211,... Dahlia 5l Parisi .My'sdaie et 6 Cork .. Ditto Boordeass I Madrid - -io paper J Coin said Bars I . •i• Ditto P3lrl - 11. l.l iiii ,tir•r Benign Gold • Ditto Vellum ..... Leghorn G.•no‘ 54 &I...win Bars .... 0 " • ~ Vallee 59 New Louis ;rack. 'I 1!1', :, Naples 45 Agio on the Sauk*, ~i ' • Lisbon 6Bl ' 4 per Cent. -------.----------- - 40•8'mi- . PRICK OF STOCKS YESTERDAY. 3 per feat. Consols (.4 7i $ s per Cent. Navy ‘. IMrl6ll 3 per Cent. Dll4O Annuities 6 15 'ft 4.1: 4Ammissa India Bonds R4 53 44 1 ^ n '' • 3 3 3 Itt•^ l . Egehesser Sills , 31 13 seem L i Rsglish Lottery/arta I. L ' 0 65 I 1 Caliwools for - _ _ _ -•-- 4 BIRTHS. T. 111 4 11, . _ ,_ of pied At flill•Woose Eisaartk, rasa, Ike ••• ' 7 h Campbell, F 49 fe N. oils !.'n. ,f C.:1,441 II In Orchard...meet. P.,rtman..qoare. the Lady i i Barr, Coldstream Guards, nf• dist bier. DEATH. • ~,i rig- •, 4, combo,. 0,6419,...c.kibbr0w1..,40 t,. ,c,....., __ pal te m the he ,i l a 7 r t en h ti ,, y ,, , ,,,,e,,t m a iV ",,.______ Ferdonsed Iltubory HIGH W4TrII , THIS o .ll', sT 11l •• 9 ":% ,, ,, , _ 1 . I 51.irn 59 nun. AA. r 9 I F... 0 3; "'!___l_ ~........! , LONDON --Printrd 11l C SMITH, N " i.cii -. _ ~‘ . IRA rt1Y,.1.1 - .1 as N ,, I''.. Back .4 4 l'i, ••••• 0 ° ' 1, 1 ,1 . he .1 iv!!! Ir. A some slur • N . oi l :: : 1 ,v..z .1.