The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-05-09 00:00:00

cs,by a contiraction oTtliat word. would retitle, hit* liable to the punishment ofthis Bill. Supposes man were digging potatoes, and a pig were to approach and est them at the time, he might he indoced to throw his shovel, atid rut the animal.—/A lauch. ) l And their Lordships would perceive how it might be contended this came within the moan ing of the law. He wits for from putting any thing ludicrous, hut it was au occurrence likely to hap pen. Again, supposing the words " otherwise abuse" were to remain; sod a poacher, in the country, though vigilantly watched, could not be detected, because hese. used hittisOf by the flight of his horse, ohich he abused by extreme riding of the onimal ; when it was found they could not punish the into as a poacher, it was determined to send him to prism), under the provisions of this Bill. Such had been his refleximis upon recuttsi deletion, and he was more nodose(' to doubt the necessity of the measure, wittily these few cloys, •; y ? having consulted those learned permits with whom eh he was in the professional habit of toosultitig upon the ndministtution of the criminol law. They *ere - not couvinced of the necessity fur this new act of teigisiatirm. But such was hew deference fur his Learned and Noble Friend's; object its the measure, that he certainly should toot divide the House upou it, when these alierat IWO should be introduced. The LORD CNARCLLL9II had a few obbervations to Make upou the Bull, as it appeared tit its preseut shape. He Oswald reserve hiruself to see what akerations were 'aide in the Committee, mid when it came for their ultimate decision, be should say content, or sot content, according to the opinion he should then form of its effects, if carried into a law. If the principle were admitted, he thought it should be extended to other animals as well a. those men tinned in the Bill. He saw on reason for paying at tention t., the ox. and totally neglecting the bull. (A laugh understood an alteration was in troduced tutu the Bill of last Sessions, whereby all animals were omitted, except beasts of &taught and burden, and his Noble and Learned Frieoti, (Ers kine) bail stated this was the same; but how came it that sheep and swine were mentioned ? If they were beasts of draught or burden, he never bad the opportunity of witnessing them in that character.— (A !meet fl—The Noble and Learned Lord (El leolorrungh) hail very well observed, that the words used in the enacting pun night to be cautiously in troduced, and for that puroise he had substitiated the worth, " kill and stab." Thesvoril " maim." it was contended, admitted of no etpiivorel con struction ; but how would it apply under the Bill ? If a into were to cut his horse's ears. it could hardly he said he bid *aimed the automat horJe, hut if he had done so to his fellow -creature, there would be no question of his having torah:red the animal mos. (A laugh.)—fie certainly considered it a subject new in legisiat ; sad, therefore, he should re serve his decision till he had au opport entity of form ing his °lnuits'' upon the Bill, after all its alter ations. The Fin of LAVDRID 41E had not Irefore ex. pr-ised his opposition to the hill, lier.iinw he was usiwilling to wooed and maids the 11,1011.hdese his Noble 41141 Le 'flied foetid. Ile depitcwed the idea of legisletitig upon h 1111 l because it Was contrary to the eta for which 1. sibilance Wino con. st.tute d. Upon the principle of the bill, all who killed animals in this country might be said to kill them with summon cruelty, unless they adopted that method, introduced from S o oni, of perforating the spine, by which morons the animal died withieta self ferias any pain. Such was bus opiiiion of tit.. mis chievous tendelecy of the Lill, that he should ems sister it his deity to oppose it, and for that purpose to divide the house opus' all its successive stages. Lord RLDLSDALE observed, be had considered it his duty to oppose the principle of the PA last Session, and he saw no reason to adopt a different &tee mination. 111 the principle were at all to he defended, it ought, w his ittut.ion, to have included other annuals, equally.ll4llle to oppressive cruelty. There was one aillinal perhaps wore thou others subject to this *mow, and vet it was omitted esstire. Iy', he whim the bull lie supposed thus h a d b rew done, on account of the uppositimi %heist' in another idace, by Mil nhdividual siert• pants! to the sport.— ut this was that species of cruelly, which tended to injure man, by its exhibition ; on that very account, was a tit object of legislation. In the neighbourhool of its residence, i 1 the country, this sport was practised, and a bull was, at stated times, let loose, to the terror of all peaceable peo ple. As to the other objects, embraced in the Bill. they were not fit fur the interference of the Legis.. ' Lenore, as they did not concii it the odvaistage or the injury Of lain. lie was ready to allow the pore.* motives to the Noble sod Li:trued Lord, but perhaps he bud so long contemplated this subject s that his mind had become so heated, as to prevent the exercise of his cool d,scretion. Lord &tsetse said, if his motel had been too much heated, he thought the mi-sts of ether Noble Lords had been too long cold, in the expression of thew opposition to Ilse principles of (hie Bill, lie thought there Wail considerable inconsistency, when Ise recollected the sonetimoes support the Bill had received the last Se.sion, alien there were present In Peers. No one ha i intieneted his objection, exclit the Noble acid Leorned Lord who had last addressed them. In the Holm of Commons, though opproitton was made. it was read the second tune with the consent or a large m sjority, and would have passed. if it hail not been at the end of the Session, when there were squicely Menthes% in form a House. He was surprised to hear what had fallen, 111111 the revolution which had been •ffemed in their Lordships minds; awl he was more surprised ti m e his Noble Friend (Lao 'eolith+ should Inti mate his dividinz the Ibns.e, at thr preaent lime, wli-n tie was in the Ilouse, yesierday, and ease nu opposition to the secreted readitii:. His Noble Friend had not tweet present • list session ; but if lie lead left ails owes hobhy•isor.e at that time, moil at tended to 405 y in that fl , vist., it wiittl•t b to hatter fur Oosi of xreater t o tit.. (minty% ,—(.4 /4444:14./ Ti.ev had hero seilfice ...att., told 'of *Spree, and his Noble Friend had troduced the Spanish mode of perforating the ache; brat in the arguments used, lie was sure h., Noble Friend could not he actions. at I. of botcher* (mold fall under the costiorsic "."" of, this kill. If their Lordships should now alter t h eir 4, it was not leis fault that he had iirnotzitt Ilse eddied, ureter their eousider ilit4oll; 1.44 they estettilcd to him every encouragement to beticie, dill concurred vith him in the propriety of the measure. For himself he tied hot alters ti his mind ni the smallest degree on the prinhiple and necessity of the Bill, and he &list ed their Lordships would not take thii omiortunitj of dividing . the House. wheo it was not su 11111 l trued, .„a had not thought proper to oppose the second reading. - Lord 1101,140l1) WAS sure, that his Noble and Learned Friend metal not have justified his conduct I fur whatever might be the difference of sentiment on the Bill, there must be attributed to that Noble and Learned Lord every good and honourable mo tive. It wee with diffideoce and great pain to Lis feelings, that he differed in opinion from him On the present question; not only front his per sonal respect for him. but from the esteem he entertained for his •talents and good qua lities, and for his past services in maintaining the law of thi s eountry; for which. in his humble judgment, without invidious distinction, the Coon try were more indebted to him. tam' any lawyer, for a number of years. Every one must tick non It a,e., that if all acts of cruelty could be prevented, it would be a most desirable object on the part of hu manity. But it MOS in his d, questionable, how far the interference of legislation would , accom plish the desired ends of the best motives. Many attempts had been made, at different times, to enforce the laws of God and morality, but they were generally productive of effects opposite to the wishes of humanity. It was on the same ground that intolerance was the usual re s ult of religious Ile should be the last man to permit acts; lie viewed them with detestation; but he doubted of the benefit of legislative interference. —lle should rather recommend the Reverend Prelates to impress the people with a sense of their moral duty. and au aversion to all acts of cruelty. His Noble and Learned Friend was entitled to thanks for his exertions in this cause, and the speech which he delivered, last sessi in, but which he had not the pleasure of hearing, though lie had the satisfaction of reading it, had done honour to his abilities and feelings, and must hate been pro ductive of beneficial effects upon the allude of the people, The LORD CHANCELLOR said a few words in explanation of his conduct; and concluded by recommending his Noble and Learned Friend to move for the re-commitment of the Bill on a certain day. and that the Lords he summoned fur that purpose. Ile would move. " That Lord Wel sinham leave the Chair."—Agreed to. Lord Eitsstos then moveJ. " That the Bill he recommitted this day se'nnight, sod that the Lords he sutnancoed.—Ordered.—Adjourtied. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Lnr4 Es ex's Estate Bill went through o Committee.— Itt port to be received to-morrow. Tim Committee on the Foreign Linea Bill wan postponed i ill to morrow. The Irish Stags Coach Bill west into a Committee, in •hich the smendiseots were ordered to he printed, and the Hill recommitted on Minotay. Ins Committere on the Expiring Laws, a Reso!ntion was 'erred to, to renew the Herring Fishery Act, which had ex pired. CAPTAIN FOSKETT. Mr. LUTTOLTOII postponed his two notices connected with this subject : the one whirls stood nir to-day, 'll - hursilay, amid that which stood for Thursday, till Thais day sennight The Ota•sr Coach Regulation Bill went through a Com mittee • the report of which was receiv e d, s ad th e f ar ther eonsid;rstinn postponed till Monday. The Clerks of the Court of Session Conipematioa Bill •ent through a Coniniittee.—Repurt to-otorrow. Mr. CliiillsOTo4 brought up the Report ens the Bill to sholish the iuferior Commissary Courts in !Scotland. The Resolution+ were agreed to, sad the tuncodunents ordered to be engrossed. The consideration of the Flax (expiring law) Bill was post putted till Monday, and the West India Insurance Bill, nod se.eral urdrir which had beer dropped, wue renewed for to-morrow. LONDON PETITION. Sir W. CURTIS held iii his hand a petition from the Lo►d Mayor, Common Council, and Livery of Loudon, in Coitintoa Ilan assembled. This petition cares ed their grievancia, and the opinion they entertained of the proceedings of the Muse of Commons, on severs; late occasions. From what had been generally acknowledged the other night, that the doors of the House should he thrown wide open to the complaints of the subject, this petition might in hi. opinion be received. Ile might, while presen.ing it, in fairness state, that though it was the petitioli of a great body, it was not the petition of the whole of the Livery of London. As it was however, the priition of a large body of his comootitiolially asoembled, he felt it to be his duty to pr,..ent it, though in wanv parts it differed very aid, ly from what were his sentnuents on the matter. there touched upon. The petition was than brought up, and read by the Clerk—(for %hie!' see our Paper of Saturday.) Sir W. Craws moved, " That it should be laid on t' e •ally." Mr. Secretaiy RTDE/1, had the less difficulty in discharging de duty he felt lie owed to t!,e. !louse id Commons. and to himself. is oplowiliz the re ceptio t of this petition, in consequence of the staiemen of the worthy Baroort alms presented it :- 4. that though passed by it 11111.111.irf of isSlllOllll Con &titbit:ol.4lly Coonciled, yet it was not the petition of the great body of the Livery of London." But 'veil had it heel, the act of eve ry individual of that large and respectable body, lie, as our of the Howe of Coininoto, would not consent to permit it to be laid on the taide ; for though deism up with great ail, to avoid smile of the ollectimis which cawed tlir rejection of the ltleddlesex petition; yet, in mai 101 l insult, it was neither leas strosig, nor less iihyeeiimahle. It was not neves-my for hiia to tlinsr elle , heard the iwtilion read. rosy ob jrrtwn to particular parts. The imprrasiou upon r van rn.na's I must he the same. that in its g••11.1'41 trlior awl * wrist, it *Vstn. put .is an inault. Whitt did the Petitioners b) a Whine i• • Is. justice, where the di4lo) of the House r wlirt dal they area. after aseersing that the ilisuom acted illegally , by say nig. that '• the totairllC• of the Blouse preseened their sot prise at that conduct 1" Without esiter.ng into details. however, lie mutt say. that if the ilouse 'could consent to receive such a pelmet) as this, it would ioderel he dr g mill-11 in the eyes of the cimaitry. lie, tlerefore, invented most strews... ti ty to th e present motion. Mr. Alderman Comae win sans there should he any oi.jection to the raseeptimi of this petition, par. titularly such an ebjectitio as the urged by the Right Hon. Secretary. As for the petition's not coining f the whole body of the Livery, such a thing was impossible; as, how could they -expect 12,000 men, of which it consisted, tu be con vened in one place together, or to be unanimous ut their opinions ? At the meeting which did take place, there were present, as far as he could judge, übout 3,1100 person*, and out of these not above 30 held up their hands against the petition. Unit% this, then, be drained its not the Net of the Livery ? II so, the votes passed by insjoinies in that House, by .the *gine rule, might be said not to be the acts of the House.' Since the Common Hell, lie under stood a counter-ineetiug hail been held, and other • resolutions agreed to. (H the signature* to these resului ions, which he had seen in the duily papers, he ackuoeledged there were wetly of the greatest respectability in the Livery ; hut is also saw sic or eight names of persons whom he could point out as having been at the Hall, without holding up their hands against the petition. Ile might he told that they found it of no use to endeavour to speak in it popular assembly, where they could expect little attention to opinion's opposite to those of the ma jority of the meeting ; but this excuse was nut sat ticient for not at least expressing, by a spew of their hands, their shs,rut fount the Resolution*, &c. which were proposed. Sir Wst. Cuter's, in explanation, said, he had never expres*ed himself that the petition was hot one of a _rout body of the Livery of London. Sir C. PRH;F:, as one of the Representatives .1 the City, and liming been present ut the meeting, called the attention of the lionise to some of the attending cireumstuticee. Bring satisfied that the House of Commons bad not **sinned any power or privilege which did not belong to them ; lie had at tempted in vain to deliver his sentiments on tile subject to the persons assembled in Guildhall. He knew many other Gentlemen, who held opinions directly the reverse of those voted by the meeting, but who did not come forward to declare theui, because they saw chinsour was the outer of the day.—/ Hear! Hear!)—His firm belief wits, that the majority of the Livery of London would never agree to such a petition ; and it it could be ascer tained by any legal means, the scrutiny would bear hint out in this assertion. The present pet -film was the fruit of a convocation, gathered by that junto, who procured these meetings, and by cla mour carried whatever they thoseht tit. But it would be found, from the counter-resolutions now signing, that the respectable port of the Livery were not converts to these opinion,. No doubt, the petition was perfect, in so far as it was the de termination of the Livery assembled, and it could not, on that account, be objected to ; bat, from the otber considerations, he had no hesitation i u con curring in the direct negative moved by the Right Honourable Secretary. Sir JAIAS SHAW said, that the petition was eer tautly the act of a Common Hall, legally conveued, and, he might also edit, numerously attended ; fur, as far as he could jndge„ there were 4,000 persons present. It was not in his power to describe the persous. He did observe many respectable Li verymen ; but, were lie asked the question, lie would have much difficulty iu affirming that the majority in the Hall were of the Livery. When he stepped forward, to declare that lie could toot con cur in the language of the petition, he could not obtain a hearing. That neither this hrusgusge tint the sentiment* were approved of by • great body of the Livery, appeared from the counter-resolu tions *greed to at another place. He had read over the names attached to this other document. and it was impossible, throughout the Livery of London, to find &my more respectable than the 1,400 si b itatures already subscribed. In his °pi ! Moil, there were not 1,400 Liverymen at the Coin -1111011 Hall. Having Matra, however, to the Hall, that lie would present their petition, lie tilt it to be his duty to support the motion for it lying on the table. M r. Wiiirnecan said, if any thing could surprise him from the opposite side of the Hi.use, it use the conduct of the Right Hon. Secretary (Ryde.), nut only in his speech, but since he spoke ; for he seemed, by his gestures, to approve of what fed both from the Hun. Bart. under the gallery (Sir C. Price), and the Hon. Baronet who spoke la.t, be. sides misrepresenting what had been said by the Hon. Baronet who presented the petition. But even were the numbers of Liverymen assembled in the Common Hell what was represented, was tition to be rejected on account of the smallness of numbers in the petitioners? If so, what dud the Right Hon. Secretary think of the majority of 38, by wh i ch he and his colleagues prevailed in sends ing Sir F. Burdett to the Tower t so, what did he think of the small numbers in the majority by which he and his colleaguev were theineclves as quitted ?—(Hear.) Beyond that, he called on the Right Hon. Secretary to mark where the dignity, where the justice, and, he might say, svh re tire common sense of the House wits, when they came to these and other decision* ?—Where was their dignity when they threw the shield over delinquent Munster,. accused of a high offence. and cool, Si. eilly guilty ? Where was their dignity, when they refused to Inunsh a Noble Lord, then a Secretary of State, and the Right Hun. Gent. opposite? (Lord Castlereagh and Mr. Neueval ?) Talk of digo4y indeed ! Thee night if they chose within these walls; het the people knew that it was extinct and lost ispoti these questions. When they lied upon their Journals. that the sale and renting of seats in the House VI WI as common as those of stalls at a fair, I.y what constructinu could they deny an expression of the same feet to the pre..;?le ? Did they exiwet the people, after these things, to approach them tamely, and without reitinubng them of their waist of dignity and justice ? The Right lionourNble Secretary would reject the petition, because Ilse construction of the House was condemned. But was it not true what was asserted in this ie•pei t ? Look at their Journals and they would find audio rity for it. A word or two more on this subje , t to the Right lion. Secretary. A Teller of the Ee -1 chequer. (Nir. Yorke,) in the county which lie lied served free twenty years, and in which lie was resp.cted fur line private character. when he clone again to be a candidate to represent them, ass usiaohnonsly iejecied, and another chosen hi his stead. The Right Hon. Gentleman opposite ought my. as their Honourable Friends f the City said, Oh, it be could have been heard, the re suite/out,' have been different." But this was in g oo f vain.; for the aesetiments of the enm i ty leidge wer e recorded I D th e Crown seTi"ll- their late Representative was now buns merit Peer, and was equally a part i n the consult, ti M . . 4 f the House. (Hoer, bear!/ Tut Itieht lloa. tart' acknowled g ed, th at t h e petitiou was eise ; i up with art and ability, sod with a studwit, red,. emir to av, the offence whi c h caused ti..l (A Mo o . dlesex to he eejected. As for the latter, h e a • ,, IhUlletleiestliAll;llo7te:;,hr:liditiOwt:4; frioart'tiuts"ebtel'intie'r is h e h a d dime for the reeeption of that from etlid. &Mire. The present petitioners, warned by tie. fate of the ce.unty petition. said, they %meat re ileevoiir to con•u:t those iipinions, which the He il e e w ertam e d ao tudispensable to its dignitt, i t with this were they to fail ? The House were tot‘ii, that if such pettimmi were received, other, twe e strong nould follow them. What was this? thry might to resettle only on what was bef ore te,„; . Reject this petition, alter having rejected that of Middlesex, and the Right Hon. Secrete' v, it i.e continued lit office, might at last tell the lila, that if they did not come in his form the 1101 come at :Ili with their complaints to the H ate . ; uC emum.ins. Tile Pe:itimier., iu thefr prat called on the Iblitse to retrace tiler: steps, see r at they ereisiderett as ille g al , mid which he cott a . dared as rash, and, therelore, cuucurred heeriii le i • that advice. .1 he Plight Hun. Secretary the hisiory of lies ma r U,ues , but *se he se-qa w i t h th e ataie of the coulter,- lei 1773, o, weich pr. nod he al tele sled, becaose he could tan tied a word strong enou t ,h its his u Wigwag, to cts erat. tenet theist by, he burio.v one fries the Fe - ncli (Bstaffruz) fur that purpose. the ti le ,. Hon. Secretary say, that Mr. Wilke., %hat, r might be lilt private chat ai•ter, was sue, iu hi, i , ststence to general warrants, .1 friend to ills Con& V Dud he mean tie say, 'hid, in stendiag op for tree right of the people to re-elect their own repreere tative, he hail not advocate I their rights ? Wechl he, under his French eppe:letion, include tee iliac of a Ceniden and a Chatham, eiuse champions of the liberties of the British If he would do this, then it was not wiiiidriftii that •he would call on the House lent to seat. a petme a which was out drawn up after a form of his own, of the nature of which, however, he did not chute to inform them. How did they now stand tin the tut.. jeCt of petitioning ? They had rejected the iet•- tion of Miedileses—they lied received the strier,er petition f. um Westminster ; atd now the, asked to reject also the least oftriisite !ram the city of London. They were thus leaving tee right in a State of uncertaiiity, aced siraiteniug the atiCeSS of the subject to Parliament. And was ties a tiine to do sa ? Now, when, if the -itlijrct not get to the House of Coin:mils, lie had so much difficulty in gettng to the throne with his complaints ; awl p irticularly, if three curaidaiii:a were ag ine4. the Right flues. throu 4 h whom alone it wolild now stein the Sovereign could lie *pp.° Tont Secretary, who, with his co'- leagues, tee defend theinselves, hal indelmateey, decorously, and falsely dragged forward the tuti [nines of their Altmarels. The right of the Lively to preiseet their addresses to the throne, from 177 u to 1775, had never been questioner! ; and in 1909, the lord Mayor, though at the Lever, was refused permission to put their petitisa into Hui Majesty's haul, and was directed to trineind it to the Secrettry of State—ii direction which uu homer Secretary Ii .1 eicr ventured to Kure—lt was se dust the avenues to the t h rone were slistracti-d Th. City of Losislou were not perinitteet evea to deliver their addresses at Cie levee as usual, bot were told .•nn ! send them to ray office." (Hew./ Here Mr. Ite DKR rose to explain the mistattenent of Mr.Wletbreisd, but the latter insisted, that. as lie Was in 11.4We:1101i of the (louse, the former hail no right to irterrupt him. lie won d not st:rreni4-r his right. uur listen to any eeplaniteli u 1 tier 111.,!,t of his speech, and the Right Hun. Secretary must wait till lie had concluded. The Heuileium then went on to remark on the expressim of toe Right Hon. Secretary, last night. Celt he did believe rosy petitions were kept back at his of t.,. aisil that it Wale impressible to read all that were pre seeded to the King. The CHANCELI.OII of the EXtHEQUEIt rose to order. The Hon. Gentleman night Merest en his right net to lie interruptel e but ht tu"' t lut i stthst it was disorderly to refer to ale) thing that had Ir.en said in a debate on a pieeedieg 'sight. Mr. WHtfaatiaD aeknowlerlgeil the ju tCr of this observation. lie woilla not trfrf tee Any pe-- ceding debate, but asserted, that, stills si:i.;ll 01.- 14ms-tome to the Throne is• w• re , now eitterposed the Right Flom SeCtet.TV, it wa• the duty of tile House to receive petitions a ith more latitude thou at any lumen period. He might igloo, yahoo. 1.- regularity, refer to the Right Hon. Secremn's letter to the Lord Mayor of London, in which H.s Majesty's sight was made the a t i . .. gy leer the 11 " 6- conduct of Ins servants. Ile hal nom tit:twined. and In-leered the fact, that 'souther Secretary. Lord ilswkesbury, had never p•towas.ed aliy. Or, at Last, vety few, of the Addrese.e. traminneed to lieu is the Crown, whets the people mid Perliametit sweet baud in Mead in their o i alituti Use err a a t liss.trouil !atilt% He !Mimed this. as all which were pre' Gritted, were published iu The Gh:rite.—(%tl frogs the ilietuters.)-1-low then del the sue jr , etttlod ? who was to smoke the releittati for il4 Gflieete f Wily. the very SPlrlatilr%• uhuin the complaints were mode. tVlstei suck sibinaclies, as they all • lait.esited, artr Op posed, by nature, to ae Maje.ty's rec.-malt tlt . : petitions of his subjects. Ministere smelt' to fl u e mote dilatant to prevent the people tee hue :1 1 1 pritati .... ; hut, instead of that. they J. " the his n l inuon. It was blamer. o e ri " gl. t iat ig ll . dri te c i u ta lt k ir e n' the it r i esolution of excluding due petitioner how the wrrou of the Kum; as h coutiaewent. to the.dey, of tie milt sppy 10 411 7 e 4 _ (Peg Nicholsois), whose attempt I .;ave rise to prentution. 'proved, that the of e nature to warrant the :ire isiou. was "tudi_ i g na in, though presented at the levee, Kramer chance of being read dens if they s a .. 4 l. though the Secretary of State's Ace, 1 1 % jesty is ..... edistely Itinded theses to the L i : waitog. But it was ensue eat eduction that tl • h t 4 ° A I n l i d r w as t ut g 3 I t nl 11 e , g whirls he was still cutopeteht to. korw there s " p.tstinn. sad Might at a foliage time eet • i hj. et to reedit to him, lb hick His w Msjes , 2_ newer k", if traamoitted to tbsSeeratety f th Wins' other' dress, Pions I, MI trtj4ll Wolf queo nsiztl beiri uou! the cmJd ch.3T to reale a sot Mi men, re Hen ▪ i beret Neil ▪ t j.)11,1 their time N II I relic elm c Ns hi grt Most tune it as kit I j et I g4ve t*-y • bee petit !he 1 pits, wpm Like t6+ 1111! "‘I tnig .fn