The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1826-06-13 00:00:00

LAIV NOTICES. COURT OF CRANCERY. VI CE -C 11 ANC K LLORII COUnT. A r II II.P-PAAT TRN. Causes.—King v. Moody, per judenent. Short Causes. Trevor v. Trevor Fowke v. Waring Davey v. Russell klonkhouse v. Stanger FentJn v. Correll, far ther directions Fenton v. To...sty, dn. Hinehoin v. Wood/ate, ditto klingay v.Corrall, ditto Same v. Toovey, ditto fluncon v. Hurls Tilbury v. Wakefield Waring v. Lloyd, to be spots to 1 11 prernr v. lisiothley, per wave T , evur v. Terms. Stephens v. 01Iva Iladie• ton v. Corbel Maier v. lestrhaell bnith r. Grey Csllln 4 v. C Ming Hard,. •. Gll,OO literal! V. !arsine Meredith tr. Senior Attornve-General e Tont.l v. Ppleer ioitunier r. Ductitsi of Kent I'UCRT OP KING'S j ~ ~~ I ~~ ,~~ . ~+ LAW INTELLIGENCE. Tllll LORD CIIIMICILLOM, AT WZIPT/11 , THIS DAT, AT 10. Appeals. tinettraoseh v. Fume% appgt lln re Sete., bankrupt petition, for c,vak v. (*pet, appeal judgment Waiktr v. Wildman, ditto Espsrte Bradbury, bankrupt pet. '//AI TER PICE-CUANCRLIIOR, At WIC , ;TPINiTiII, THIS PAT, Hague v. ninth, per order Kolght v. Piggott, de murrer per order Blomotne v. Thorold Sweet v. Rowe De Timet v. Chapman Ilargreave% v. Sander+ Lewis v. 1.ew14, at de fendant'. requea Chalk r. Smith Harding v. Todd (Mei v. Tosner Clue , t v. Parker [Todd • Jon.- I Peachey v. Cleft DENCll.—Twis DAT, AT HALT-IPAST Nl' N. London. l'iirfended Comes, only, wilt be tried In London, this day. Notice court have been given, at the Marshal*, Office, of each eatwes es un defeo.led, or the Records would sot be not to Uulldhell fur trial. COURT OF EXCREQUER.—T.,n DAy, AT Tu. Nsinby ♦ .ollands, demurer. by order. The Chief Boron has got through the '1 hole ~f the Causes that were set doss nto be beard. His Lordship hos used the roost Indefatigable induutry in thus elearlrr his Court of business to the great courenienee of the pr to oession and suitors generally. COURT OF AD3IIRAITV.—TOIS DAT. AT 'ELWIN. Fourth sad Wet ae*.iou In Trinity Term, 1826. I.IIAD STOMILA. COURT OF CHANCERY, MONDAY, JUNE 12. CASE OF SIR GREGORY PAGE TURNER. The I.oais CHANCEI.LOII wished to know whether the Solid toe of Sir Gregory was acquainted with the affidavit which had been handed up to the Court. The demands of the petition could rot be granted if that aft:davit were true, u he believed it to be. The petition asked for a sorn of money, but if the affidavit of the Committee were true, the Court must be informed where the money was to be found. finless the Cour.sel or himself (the Chancellor) furnished it, he did not know where it was to be had. He was convinced that mischievous consequences proceeded from the do. ermination of one of the parties to persist in the traverse. ZDEBBOROUGH V. THE BISHOP OF I.OIIION. The LORD CUANCELLOR said that in thig case, respecting the right of el:cting the 3linister aid Churchwardens of the Parish of Coleman-street, he should not hesitate to state it as.his opinion that the tied of election was in the parishioners, who paid to wards the church and poor, proceeding by open election and not by ballot, and unless he paid any thing more on the subject to-mor row morning, it: might be understood to say judicially, that this election was void. Mr. HART believed that what his Lordship said would be per fectly satisfactory to the parish ; they would proceed to another eleclN.ll, c(snilucting themselves according to what they understood to be his opinion. The Loan CHANCELLOR said that his opinion rested, in a great degree, on the circumstance, that the proceedi , g seemed to have been very much under the influence of the vestries. Looking at the constitution of vestries, the right of election by open vote appeared to him to be vested in those who paid to the church and poor : but although the election appeared to him void, he did not think that the bill could be dismissed. The election by ballot was certainly void, and the parish should therefore proceed to a new election ; and in the mean time, the Trustees, the Bishop, and the Archbishop should be restrained from presenting. F! ~(~ N t • • 1 , i• IF I 41 EX-PARTE ORDISTEAD IN TIIE MATTER OF HOWARD AND GUIDS. His Lortnentr read the evidence in this ease, and commented on it at considerable length. He observed, in conclusion, that lie found it difficult to reconcile the answers ; he should state before be left the Court on Wednesday the final decision to which he should arrive. The Dukes of Lennox, Argyle, and Montrose, the Illarquis of Lothian and Viscount Dumblainc, took the oaths of allegiance and supremacy, previous to voting at the election of Scotch Repre sentative Peers. VIC&CHANCELLOWS COI,'RT, MOND kY, JUNE 11 BOLLARD V. MARSH. This was • bill filed by Mr. Bolland, assignee of the banking house of Marsh, Stracey, anedCo., to recover the sum of 73,5001., due of Marsh and Son, of the Navy Agency Oflice, to that bank ing.house. Wm. Marsh, the father of the present defendant, was a partner in both establishments, and there was no contradiction of the fact of the payment of the money by the banking-house to support the credit of the Navy Agency Office. The defence set up was. that the defendant, Arthur Cuthbert Marsh, was not a artner in the Navy Agency Offiee, within the knowledge of the bankers, and that his non-liability was to be deduced in consequence of a letter, sent by William Marsh (his father) to the other partners of the banking establishment.— This letter, dated in December, IWO, stated," that although they understood that all the drafts of his sen Arthur, for the accounts standing in their book, in the name of Arthat Cuthbert Marsh, were tinkly on his (Wm. Marsh's) responsibility and account ; and that his son was not his partner for matters of profit and loss; yet that he deemed it necessary to state particularly to the firm, that tars son was not a partner.' The father subsequently died, and the son, the present defendant, wrote a letter on the fah October, 1824, to the banking-house, in which he stated, that an account stood on their kooks in his name, which was to their knowledge on the ac. count of his lather solely, and as he wished to settle all the debts due to and from the estate, lie desired that they would appoint some person with whom he might windup the affairs of his (the Navy Agency Office)establishment in the first instance. This letter was backed by one from Fauntleroy, in which he stated that he as sented to the troth of what was written by the defendant, and that be would not consent to any interference of the assignees of Marsh and Son, except for the purposes mentioned in the Son's letter. A long discussion respecting the liability of the dcfcrAlatit as a partner occurred to-day, in which Mr. Mole•raott and Mr. RIALTO contended, that as the only question was, whether the debt was a joint one of Marsh and Son, or a separate debt of William Mandl, It would be wrong that the creditors of the banking-house, which confessedly supplied the o..err, 'should be in a worse condition than any of the others. 'l . l.ete WAS a nominal and also an actual partnership; for the fiv ;i he-, wishing to ;inner . his son, had agreed by a deed to exempt hint from the responsibil:e.y of the concern. It was contended on the opposite side, that the banking concern was well aware of the irrespon.ihility of the defendant under the deed, but all the deal ings were evidently of a joint nature, and the securities received were treated in a manner which countenanced that impression. Mr. HART argued that the defendant was not liable, and that • the relief would be incon,i,tent with propriety ; for the Court had no tight to cleave where a common action would lie, as in this ease. The partners in the batik had acted under a knowledge of the de feedant's exemption. linen Mr. William Marsh went to re-esta blish the navy agency office, lie took his sou into partnership, in • expectation that ultimately some profit would befortheoming.; but to prevent his liability, it was specially provided by a deed of contract, that the son should receive Platt in lieu of profits, and that he should be free from any charges affecting the establishment, but that the surplus profit should be allowed to accumulate, and on the contingency of such an event, that then he was to participate. The letter also spewed that the purpose was to make him separate. The partners in the bank had been actuated by a.consideration of having an additional security in case of the father's death. His HOWOU II was of opinion that, either es a nautili; or actual ,partner, the defendant was prima facie liable. There was, how. ever, some novelty attaching to the case. If the partners had acted •undet the influeneeof a nilsrepresemation.made by the father, in the letter of December, 1820, it must be considered a joint debt, notwithstanding their acquiescence. Unless that interfered, there could be no doubt that the defendant was implicated in the debt. There were two views to be taken of the matter, either that be was IDA actual ot a nominal partner ; but a nominal partner was liable, except to those who knew that he was not in fact in partnership, and who were told that he was not so. The next question was, whether the representation in the father's letter wu true or not; and the cre ditors seemed :o say to the father, "we will not cousider whether your son was or was not,a,partner, an:l therefore we look to you." life Honour did not think that it could be correc:ly shewn that the eepeuentation ie the letter was true, which would prove that the sot was not a punnet in the profits. From what other source was be-to get the 800/. per annum stipulated in the contract, and the motet, of the surplus profits when they accumulated to 44,006/.? The defence set up was a special contract against the general law ; and the point turned on the effect of the representation in the let. ter. Hut that was not consistent with the deed of contract to which it !fretted, and which entitled hint to an annual ►hare and a con. tiiigcnt benefit of the accumulation. The question was simply Ow, whether that representation, as inconsistent with the deed, sLoul.l he deemed valid ? Were the banking partners to he botiod, because they arquieaced under the erroneous Idea that the repre sentation in the letter was curect ? No ; they were not to be hell hy such a misrepresentation. The first impression of every person w:to read that letter mutt naturally be. that the son was a partner. J!i• would therefore direct au iuue on the point in:o the Courts er Law. Jr. HEALD Raid it vu 1141111 to send the Jaques from that Court into the Court of Common Fleas, but he hoped that the assignee would not, In consequence of having formally brought the nia-ter into Equity, be precluded from the option of the Court in •ttirh they would otherwise have had the privilege of-the case being met. From the magnitude of the sum which formed the subject ut di4pute, they were anxious that the trial should be in the Court or Aing's Betwift. - Ilk Ilowous did not see any cause for altering the usual course sending issoes into the Common Pleas, where the matter would plosive all requisite attention. lle therefore directed that the Issue ►uo..ld be tried is that Court COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MONDAY, JUNE 12., The Loan Clime* it; ST rc E sat till half-past eleven this morn ing at Nisi Prins, and disposed of several undefended causes. Their Lordships afterwards took their seats, and heard arguments upon rules Nisi obtained for new trials. ORECIORY r. FLEET. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is the proprietor of a dissenting chapel at Brighton, to recover from the defendant, the proprietor of the Brighton llcrahl newspaper, compensation in damages for the injury his character bad sustained by the publication of a gross and calumnious libel in that paper. The libel in question wits contained in a letter. addressed by a Mr. Hewlett to the Editor of the Brighton Herald, is which the writer licensed the plaintiff of having given orders to two constables to turn him (Hewlett) out of the chapel, when he presented himself to take a seat. In making public the statement of facts therein contained, the writer declared that his only object was to vindicate his character from the imputation which such _conduct. on the part of the plaintiff was calculated to affix upon his reputation. In the same newspaper was contained a supposed defence of the plaintiff's proceeding?, in exercising the right of excluding what persons he pleased from his own private chapel, which had not then been consecrated to public worship. The article contained a fulsome culogium on the plaintiff's piety, and zeal for the welfare of his townsmen. This eulogium was charged by the plaintiff to he satiri cal and ironical, and therefore libellous. The action was tried before Mr. Baron Graham, at the late assizes at Horatian), and a verdict found for the defendant. On a former day Mr. Gurney obtained a rule Nisi for a new trial. Mr. 3IARRYATT this day &hewed cause against the rule, and was proceeding in his arguments, when The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE suggested that the best course to be (ilated by the parties would be, to agree to a Oft imams. lifr. GURNEY and Mr. 111•111TATT both acquiesced in this 1 suggestion. The rule was therefore discharged. - - --------- TO3ILINSON V. THE PARISH OP TIETBRIDGE. This was an action brought by the plaintiff' who is a surgeon residing in the parish of St. Mary Maldon, to recover from the overseers of the poor of the parish of Ilcybridge the amount of his charges for medicine supplied by him to a poor woman who had met with an accident in Heybridge, and was removed by the con stable of that place into the adjoining parish of St. Mary Maldon. The Jury, at the trial, gave a verdict for the plaintiff, On a former day of this term, Mr. Nolan obtained a rule Nisi to set aside the verdict and enter a nonsuit, upon the ground that die liability to relieve, or render assistance to casual poor, attached only to that parish in which the pauper should be, and where the expense was incurred, and not to the parish in which the accident hap pened. Mr. Gunn EY and Mr. CrirTTT now sheaved cause against the rule. and Mr. NOLAN argued in support of it. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICE thought that the rule ought to be discharged. According to the authority of the case, '• The King against the inhabitants of St. James, at Mary St. Edmund's," if the parish of Ileybridge had taken the poor woman in, and had administered relief to her, it would not have been competent fur them to have treated her as an individual liable to be removed to her own parish by an order of the Magistrate, to be suspended until she ass in a state fit to be removed. If therefore she had been taken into any house by the parish officers of Hey bridge. they would have been under a legal as well as a moral obligation to provide her with the necessary medical and other assistance. It appeared to him that the removing her from their own parish to another.did not relieve them from that ' , litigation ; but that they were still as liable to it as they would have been if they had retained her in their own parish, and rendered her the asaistance she required. He was therefore of opinion that the verdict was right, and that the rule for setting it aside ought to be discharged. Mr. Justice BAYLEY thought the; verdict 'forfeit. It was of the greatest importance that it should be known by all persons, in eases of this nature, upon whom it was that the legal liability at tached. It would be highly prejudicial to the interests of the community, and to the rights of the poor, that whenever an acci dent should !molten, thequ'ation should be agitated, or even pass, in the minds of those persons in whose parish the pauper was by ne cessity placed, to consider whether the burden of rendering relief was to be borne by them, or whether, by any contrivance, it could be shifted upon other shoulders. The cons, quence might be, that unless the law stated on what party the obligation should fall, the life of the pauper would be risked by a removal to a distance. In the case of Lamb v. Bounce. 4 Mawle and Selwyn, which had been relied upon by Air. Nolan, Lord Ellenborough spoke not of a mo ral, but of a legal, obligation. In cases or this description, he said, it could not be a matter of dispute, in point of law, on whom the obligation rested ; and he wished it to be understood, that where any delay would necessarily be attended with danger, the law raised an obligation against the parish where the party should be taken sick, to relieve him and to supply his necessities. There fore, founded upon that authority, his (Mr. Justice Bayley's) opi nion was, that in this rase the law raised a legal obligation upon the parish officers of Hey bridge to give this woman relief. Lord El lenborough had also said, that if the parish officers stood by and SAW the duty performed by the surgeon, and did not make any ob jection at the time, the law would raise a promise on their part to pay the expenses. Now, when the officers knew that there existed an indispensable necessity that relief should be administered, it seemed to him (Mr. Justice Bayley) to be exactly the same thing as if they had stood by and authorized the act. Jn addition to the care of Lamb r. Bounce, there was a subsequent one of Jennett v. Tomkins—Dowling and Ryland's Rep.,541--from which itseemed to him that it might be inferred that the law cast an obligation on the parish in which the accident happened. The action was there brought against the officers of the parish to which the pauper be longed; and this Court intimated a very strong feeling that the action was not properly brought. Under all the circumstances of this case. therefore, he was of opinion, that the rule ought to be ,discharged. Mr. Justice HOLROYD and Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE Con curred. Rule diseharged. Tilt KING V. BENNETT ANT) OTHERS. The Linn Cn lEF JUSTICE said, this was a rule obtained by the Atiorney-General against the defendants, Justicetand officers of the borough of Falvey, in Cornwall, calling on them to slim cause why a criminal information should not be filed against them for certain alleged malpractices in their several offices. Their Lordships had read the affidavits on both sides, and they were of opinion that the rule ought to be made absolute as to four of the defendants. namely—Bennett, Giles, Congdon, and Jordan ; and that it should be discharged as to Ephraim Robins. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MONDAY, Juxz 12. FAIRLY V. HERRING AND OTIIERS. This was an action tried at Westminster in the sittings after Easter Term. and brought by the plaintiff, as holder of bills of exchange to the amount of 11.0001. The defendants were the pro prietors of certain mines in America, and appointed a person named Morley as their agent. This individual appointed a lllr. Hexter u sub-agent,who, wanting funds to improve and continue working the mines, received authority from the defendants' agent to draw bills upon them, which he did accordingly. The defendants sub sequently sold the mines to the Mexican Mining Company, who proposed taking up the bills. The defendants, however, objected to this, conceiving that it would injure their credit to have bills drawn upon their house taken up by another party. Mr. Morley, their agent, therefore advanced to the defendants, on behalf of the Company, the necessary fonds for taking up the biils. The bills were dishonoured, and protested by the plaintiff. One of the tie. fendants, on being informed of this by Morley, said, " Sir! are they not paid? They ought to be !paid ; we have received the money fog them." On being subsequently applied to, they de clined taking them up till they had settled some accounts with their sub-agent in America. The defence set up was, that the words used did not amount to an acceptance of the bills, and that if they did, the plaintiff was estopped by having protested them. The Jury found that the plaintiff prote:ted the bills, being ignorant of the fact of the defendants having accepted them; and a verdict was entered for the plaintiff, with leave to move for a nonsuit. Mr. Sergeant %WILDE accordingly moved on a previous day for a rule Nisi, when the Court made a case of it for special argument. 'lr. Sergeant STANKI t: now contended that the plaintiff was en titled to recover, on the ground of parole acceptance. at.d cited the case of Lumley and Palmer, Strange, WOO, in support of his argu ment. Mr. Sergeant WatnE, on the part of the defendants, contended that if there had been a promise, it was nos made to the drawer of the bills: and that it was laid down in numerous cases, that a per son could not recover on parole acceptsnce, after having protested a bill. The Loon CHIEF JVSTICE said, looking at the facts of the case, he considered, both in point of justice sold law, the plaintiff was entitled ter recover. The defendants, in the arrangement they had made with the Mexican Mining Company, had been benefited by the outlay of the money which was the cause of the present action. The Company, too, had advanced them money for the ex pu.:ss purpose of taking up these bills. Mr.-Sergeant Wilde had contended that the promise was not made to the drawer, and that the plaintiff was ignorant of the promise ; but if a man took a bill, he took it with all the advantage such bill might portent, though he were ignorant of the fact. The tulvantage, whatever it might be, teaselled with the contract, and the plaintiff had a right to avail himself of it. If a man andert•.uk an acceptance, he undertook to pay ; if he undertook for the formal parts, he undertook in point of law far the substance. The then, was entitled to re cover in point of law, and he thought no human being would say that he was not equally entitled in point of justice. The other Judges concurred with the Lotd Chief Justice. Rule discharged. BLUM V. WELLESLET. Mr. Sergeant Srasixta, for the defendant, obtained a rule to postpone the trial of this cause till the sittings aAer next Al ichad mas Term, on account of the absence of a material witness on the Continent. TRUTH, A NOV 1.: L.—Although events of a description narrated in this production are probably of not very unfrequent occurrence, they have rarely, if ever before, appeared in print.— The heroine, Evanshaw is • young, accomplished, and Vir tuous heiress, who, having been rigidly treated by a puritanical mmhe r, imbi bes opinions adv:rse to those of her family. She is in consequence driven from her home, loses her paternal property, and sullas a series of persecutions, under which nothing but the firm ness and self-respect arising from her conviction of the truth of 'her sentiments could have supported her. From this sketch, it will at once be perceived that the novel is written in a spirit very (lir , fercnt front that of eudebs or Tremaine. The admirers of the orthodox works have, however, no reason to complain of the fair mu of their adve•sary's argument. THE BRITISH PRESS• CORONER'S INQUEST AT C.4RLISI,E. At about six o'clock on Wedneadny evening, Richard Lowry, i Esq. proceeded to take the inquisition on view of the deceased females, at the house of Mr. Joseph Ritson, the Joiners' Arms, in Caldewgate, when Mr. Robert Abraham, surgeon, of Carlisle, was sworn. The examination was as follows :—I was this day called in to view the bodies of the deceased, Isabella Pattinson ard Mary P.irreil. It appeared that the deceased, Isabella Paitinson, received a woun d from a musket-shot on the upper part of the skull, which caused the fragments to press oar the beam, which pressure caused such injury M the brain as produced death. I also examined the body of Mary liirreil, yesterday afternoon, who was in the ogonies of &nit; she had received a wound, on her left temple; and I find that the left temporal bone was broken and part of it carried away, which', a used her death. It was evidently from a musket ball striking against the temporal bone. I believe it came kart' behind. About a quarter before eleven on Tuesday morning. I hail occasion to go down to Caldewgste, when I saw Sir l'hilip Musgrave and several gentle men in the street. not receiving any molestation. I left Caldew gate about half an hour afterwards, and neither saw nor heard of any disturbance. About • quarter before one, I went down again, and saw several crowds collected, some of whom were before a house in Shadilongate. Inquiring into the cause, I was informed that Sir Philip had been mobbed, and had taken refuge in that house, and dent not venture out again. I went away, and called at Mr. Carrick's, the druggist, in .friahgate Brow, and in a few minutes I saw the Mayor and some other gentlemen coming down towards the bridges. Mr. Carrick and I then went on the bridges, at a little distance from the Mayor, where we stopped and had a full view of the house where Sir Polito was said to be. We saw the Mayor and his party proceed towards the house. The tnob then pelted them with missiles, during which the gentlen.ca still advanced but when they came opposite a wall, on the right, 011, y received a volley of stones, from behind the wall, which comptll.ll them to retreat. The gentlemen did retreat ; part of them scented to go towards Calilewgate, and part towards the city. I thought some mischief would occur, and I went back to Mr. Carriek's shop, where I stayed about an hour, and saw that the mob had consi derably increased. Shortly alterwards an officer of artillery, • aerjeant, and three privates, followed by two companies of the 55th regiment of foot, along with whom were Mr. John Dixon and several other gentlemen, with others, whom I understood to be special constables. I followed else behind them into Shaddon gate ; and when the soldiers approached within a stone's-throw of the mob. they were assailed by vine's of stones and brick-bats. The soldiers continued to advance, and the mob continued to assail them. The soldiers then halted fora few moments, and seemed to be doing something with their arms, but I do not know what. They then rushed rapidly forward with fixed bayonets. The people then dispersed in all direetione as fast as possi ble; and while they were in full retreat, I saw a musket fired by one of the soldiers towards Queen-street. Its discharge WAS followed, at re gular intervals, by discharges of from twelve to i;ettly other musket., which seemed to be fired in different directions vivant, the retreating mob. I thought at that time that they were blank. cartridges, tired over the heads of the people. Immediately after. wards Sir Philip and his friends, accompanied by the artillerymen, passed me, on their way to the city. The foot soldiers, after stay ing • minute or two on the bridge, returned to the city also. I was returning, when a woman called me back, and told me in great agony that her husband was shot. I accordingly went down to the place, and saw Isabella Pattinson, and remained with her while Mr. Thom performed the operation of trepanning the skull, which did no gond, for she died the same evening. I went also to see Mary Birrell. whom I found wounded; but I told her frichds that there were no possible hopes, fur she was in a dying state. After Mr. Abraham's evidence, the Coroner adjourned the In quest until next morning at nine o'clock, when Mr. W. Thom, surgeon, was examined, and deposed that he was called to the assistance of the deceased females. That he went to Isabella Pattinson, and performed the operation of trepanning the skull; and remained with her two hoots, during which time she was insensible. I understand she died the same evening. It is my opinion that the wound was caused by a muskct.shut. Dinah Clark.--I ant a widow. I reside in Shadtiongate, in which place I keep • school. Isabella Pattinaon, the deceased, was at my door on Tuesday. I brought her and several other children into the room, for safety, when I saw the soldiers coming across the Caldew-bridge. I then shut the window of the school. The deceased was not one of my ',coolant, but my sister brought her in with the rest. I fastened the door, and afterwards went into the school. [ expressed to the children haw thankful I was that we were safe. Isabella Pattinson was standing on the floor, at some distance from the window, with two other littlegirls. They had hold of each other's hands, the deceased being in the middle. I took care again that the door was fastened ; and when I re turned the children had all retired into the hack room, and I found Pse deceased lying on the floor. Site said site had been moot; and I lifted her into my arms, and endeavoured to take her out, to get • little air; but hndipg it impossible to take her any further, on account of weakness, I sat down at the room door, and rested her head upon my lap. I saw a quantity of blood on her head, and began to look where bhe was wounded. I saw on the crown, or rather on the back 'part of her head, a large hole. I laid her head down on the rug at the door, and went into the house to pro cure a towel. I afterwards called in some of the neighbours to tuy assistance, but who they were, from the confused state of my mind, I cannot recollect, except one Wm. Rigg. We then carried her into the back room, laid her on a chair, and applied a cloth to her head, for the purpose of absorbing the blood. I sent Rigg for the girl's brother, Richard Pattinson, who accordingly came in a few moments, and went away again for Mr. Thom, who came about three, or a little before ; and after the wound was dressed the deceased languished, till about 25 minutes before eight in the evening, when she died. I examined the place where the ball en tered ; and it came through the window-abutter, and through the glass. While I was shutting up the windows a great number of people were there, and a quantity of stones were thrown about— from what source I know not. Mr. John Cockburn sworn—When I received information that Sir Philip had been towelled by a crowd and had taken refuge in my buildings, I went down to see what was transpiring. This was, I believe, after dinner time, perhaps between two and three; I oaw a great crowd of people together, and went into the square just be ' hind where Sir Philip was confined. After making inquiry where Sir Philip was, several persons came up to me, and asked me to have the goodness to get Sir Philip out of his confinement. I begged that they would not ask me any questions at all. They replied, " Sir, we give you our word, we pledgeour word that we will escort him safely to his quarters." The man who spoke to me seemed to be a very civil mar.; but I begged them not to urge me any more; and I then went away to the zoom above that in which Isabella Pattinson was afterwards shot. 6liortly afterwards the Mayor and Mr. Ferguson and two or three gentlemen came ; the report of their coming induced me to go up. When they came, they attempted to proceed to the place where Sir Philip was confined, but were re. pulsed by stones. This was before the military came. There was then a short cessation of disturbance; and almost immediately af terwards a report prevailed that the military were coming. The military did come ; about half an hour after the Mayor first came, and halted at the place opposite the brewery. above u hundred yards from the place where Sir Philip was. They went under covet of the building, as for safety ; stones were flying in all directions. I suppose that the stonek pouring in this manlier upon them, induced them thus to seek a kind of shelter. They remained here a very short time, during which they acre apparently charging their pieces, and they then advanced, preceded in front by an officer. Morley the constable was also preceding them. Whilst the sol diers were advancing stones still flew about, but in nothing like so great n number as before ; for wherever the soldiers marched, the crowd dispersed; and in a short time the streets became nearly cleared. Orders were then given (I believe by the officer in front) to lire. There was a great deal of noise, so that I could scarcely distinguish one from the other; but it was the commanding' officer who gave the order to fire. At this time very few of the crowd were to be seen. The soldiers advanced, and two or three shots were fired by some of them. I was then looking out of the front window. The soldiers were exactly opposite to the house where I was. I believe the pieces were all of them, without ex ception, levelled in different directions. I believed then that they were firing blank cartridges. They marched up the street and in. stand). rescued Sir Philip. 1 did not see the Riot Act read ; I can. not say whether it was ()snot; I saw nothing like it. I could not see any one tall, because there was scarcely any one to be seen ; but I afterwards saw the woman, Mary Ilirrell, as she was carried, and whom I understood to have been killed by a shot. [The father here addressed one of the jurors, and the Coroner said he coul t nut permit ally private talking between the jury and an interested indi vidual.l Ily a Juror—Just before the soldiers began to march I believe there were about 200, chiefly of both sexes. When they were charging, I really believe Mere were not more than half a score to be seen from the window where I was. The soldiers directed their muskets up Queen-street. I did not then sec any stones thrown from Queen-street. George Irwin, of Carlisle, sworn—ln consequence of the reports which prevailed in Carlisle, I went down to Shaddongate, front curiosity, to see what was going on. The first thing I took notice of was four or five groups GI people. chiefly women. They were talking only ; and far fewer people than I had expected to see. I mixed among them, and joined in conversation with them. They told me that Sir Philip had been taken into a yard in Milnbum's Buildings, where he had been canvassing one Matthews, a freeman. When in this yard, they said the people had come round him. They said it was a mere passage which led into the yard ; and that Sir P. might as well have attempted to go through the walls as amongst the dense crowd which was then in the passage. They told me Sir Philip had said, he desired any one or two to step forward, and he would answer any question they might think proper to put to him. Then, (said they,) two men stepped forward ; and one of them began by saying that Sir Philip was not a proper man to re present a commercial town. A long conversation ensued between them, when they got him through the passage, from the place where he was confined. As he was coming out he was pelted with stones, and he then took refuge. When I went to Shaddongate, there was not a person standing near the house where Sir Philip had taken refuge; but they all seemed talking among themselves in groups. I mixed in the crowd, and attempted to dissuade them from any acts of violence. Mr. Cockburn then came up to me. The witness now only corroborated the evidence as given by Mr. John Cockburn, excepting the following:—l went with Mr. Cock burn up stairs; I heard the artillery officer cry "forward.forward," when about twenty or thi r ty rushed out of the ranks, and fired towards the houses and down Queen-street. I heard Junes Morley, the constable, giving orders to fire. The people were running into passages and down the street, and the soldiers fired after them. I do not know whether or not any one obeyed Morley. Morley pointed to the house where we were, and cried out to oue officer, "Fire then—there are some— there." I/M one of i dets point a musket towards the win dow ; and he find. Thergoldiers were nut of the Tanis. I saw no one standing between him and the window, at which he would aim. , i T t h w r as ee t o h th at er b b al a l ll :h sh i a c v h i rescued by the military, and stones were thrown after them as the y o n e a k t the te house, wi c en ndow. s h s iij e p war w w a s he t t h h e e n r er n g e nstt struck the house, I cannot swear whether It was that ball which wcnt i went sway. I saw no stones thrown from Queen-street. Hugh Shields, of Caltiewgate, weaver, sworn.—l was in Shad dongate at work, after dinner, when the military came down. They halted beside Atkinson the dyer's. Corporal Graham, of the 65th, reconnoitred Queen.street, and after he returned. the military came down at a quick pace to Mrs. Clark's, where Isabella Pattinson was shot. One of the 55tit, whose name was William Irwin or Irving (a private). discharged his musket down past James Rennison's house, in Wilson's row. I went into James Noble's front room, opposite to the new brewery. James Noble anti I were looking out of the window when we saw Irving come from the place where he had discharged the musket, and load it again under the wall. He and others fired, at the order of James Morley, and in all di rections. One ball penetrated the window where Irving the clogger lived, but it did not touch nny body. Another ball went throuch Irving's door, and grazed the wall. This did nor hurt any one. .% third ball went into the window. end it warthis ball which Clot the deceased Isabella Pattinson ; I cannot say positively from which musket the last ball proceeded. But to judge of the bail's enter ing the window from the direction in which the muskets were pointed, I can say which musket the ball came from. The sot. doers almost immediately marched away, and I came nut of the house, and was told first that Mary Birrell was shot, and then that Isabella Pattinson was shot. I saw stones thrown, out then it was before the military came. 1 did not see any thrown at the military. Bye Juror.—When the men fired, they were some distance a part from each other. Irving fired in the direction of the window. It was impossible for any other ball to have perforated the window but the ball which I suppose prome.ted from William Irving's musket. The Jury then went to view the places whence the balls, accord ing to dii . witness's ceidence. were fired, and on their return, William Rlgg, of Qiieen.etreet, was sworn, and deposed to Ir ving's being the musket (by his description of the soldier). and he corroborated the evidence of the last witness, but he could not say whether or not it was Irving who fired through the window. Joseph Burdis, a serjeant in the 55th regiment, deposed that he was ordered out with his regiment to Shaddongate by his Com mander, Capt. Gardner. They were, when down at Shoeldongate, ordered to prime and load by Capt. Gardner, and they obeyed the orders. Did not know who gave the orders to fire. The mob continued to pelt them with stones up to the time of the firing. There were between twenty and thirty shots fired, when the men were ordered to retire. Their arms were afterwards examined. lie knew how many balls each man was supplied with. Irving was supplied with ten rounds of ball. When lie returned to the Castle, he had nine in his cartridge box, and one in his gun, which had never been fled. I know this, because we examined the whole of to! eons. It is usual to examine pieces with this accuracy. Cap'. Tiineiaa lamed, Royal Artillery, was sworn, and deposed Me, t'n being informed that Sir Philip Musgrave was con fined by some persons dle cei his canvass, he, in company with ;O two (Aims of the 55th regiment, went, through curiosity, to aver. min the truth of the report, and saw what had been obesity de. posed on evidence, with respect to 5tU.7. 11 groups's of people; but he wondered that Sir Philip did not conic out there appeared to be nothing to molest him. Returned abortiy after, Mayor coming down towards the place. They all went to Shaddongate, and were assciltd by stones; and there was great cheering, whereon some of the gentlemen preser.t called upon the Mayor to reed the Rlot Act, which he did in my presence and hearing, in a loud audible VAlee ; and I repeated the words after him. I expressed my opinion that at this moment it would be ex pedient for thb Mayor's party to rush upon the mob and charge, calculating upon the assistance of certain people behind them, whom I took to be special constables, but who did not conic tip to our relief, and I partly retreated in consequence of the increasing volleys of atones. I then stated to the Mayor that I was a military man, and put myself under the Mayor's orders. The Mayor then said lie had sent to the Castle for military force, and requested me to cooperate with a small party under my command. I then went to the Castle, and found that the Commanding o ffi cer of the 55th (Captain Gardner) had received orders to hold his men in readi ness, but did not understand that he was to leave the Castle with. out further commands. I then told him I had received orders to repair to the scene of riot immediately, and I then collected as many of my men as were in the way (three privates and a serjeant), and furnished them with twenty rounds of ball cartridge each. I met a gentleman on the way, who told me the Alayor was made prisoner by the mob, who were ill-treating him, and he thought unless the Mayor was rescued he would be murdered. I now thought that as the Mayon was confined, no Magistrate would be there to give orders. I therefore thought I could not act, and halt ed on the bridge, and on looking round, observed a party of the 56th coming down the Irish Brow; where they halted (about 60 or 70 yaids behind Inc.) I sent my eerjeant to ascertain the cause of their halting; anti to inform Captain Gardner of the Mayor's arrest. They sent word back that there was no magistrate on the spot, but that Mr. Ferguson was expected in a few minutes. I then retreated in a direction towards the 55th ; and when I got about half way I noticed them advancing towards ns. I then faced my men, and we went on towards Shaddougate; Mr. Ferguson shortly joined ua, and the 65th followed. The Riot Act was read ; the civil party had been attacked before ; and when we arrived at the spot where this occurred, several people rushed out of Queen. street and assailed us with stones. Mr. Ferguson and myself ad. vaneing, I was struck with a stone; and Mr. F. came towards us, saying, " I fear you will be obliged to fire." Both of the parties now halted in sections; but they afterwards formed a line facing the dam. I repeatedly askedermission to charge them. I asked Mr. Ferguson and Capt. Gar dner, who were standing together, but at first received no answer ; at length the word was given by both of these gentlemen and myself to prime and load. The men cc. cordingly did so. The magistrate said we had better fire, when I cried oat to my men," For God's sake fire high, and do no harm." During the first shots the mob still continued to advance, and they pelted us. I was busied afterwards in seeking a man who had struck me with a stone, and I lost him. In afterwards coming out of Queen-street, saw Sir Philip and his friends at liberty. By a Juror.—l was not the senior officer present. filr. Fergu. son humanely desired us to fire into the air. ('pen my oath, no roan pressed me on the side of the mob to fire. If we had advanced with bayonets, more damage would have been done. I state this from my own knowledge and experience as a military man. Mr. W. N. Hodgson, solicitor, of Carlisle, deposed that the Mayor read the Riot Act ; and that he read it sfterthe Mayor nearly to the end ; but the Mayor finished. This was done in the midst of stones. The crowd pursued and increased upon them. William Wilson was sworn, but his evidence was generally cos. roborative. The only material part of it was his examination, at the conclusion, by a juror, when he said that there was not a living soul standing in queen.street, but the boy, Mary Rirrel, and Noble. No one bred at the same time that Irving did. I saw him level his piece, and I observed the smoke come from it. This witness was the last examined. Two others came up; but from what they said, their evidence was not material, as it would be only corroborative. • The Coroner summed up the evidence, and, at a late hour,. the Jury returned the following verdict:— That the deaths of the deceased Isabella Pattinson and Mary Birrell were occasioned by balls discharged from muskets, by some soldier or soldiers belonging to the 55th regiment of foot. That in consequence of the Riot Act having been read, and the mob not dispersing, the soldiers were, in the first instance, justified in firing their muskets ; but the Jurors cannot retrain from expressing, as their opinion, that they continued to fire in a very indiscreet and inconsiderate manner, and particularly at private houses, when the necessity for so doing seems to them to have ceased. That their deaths were, in other respects, Accidental. The inquest lasted about 16 hours. CARLISLE.—(From • private letter of Saturday.)—" The Car lisle Papers would give you full intelligence of the proceedings at the election, and the state of the poll last night. During the after toon, the partizans of Sir Philip were indiscreet enough to parade the streets with flags ar.d music ; and, as might be supposed. much irritation was manifested towards them. The mob made a furious attack on them, tore their flags, knocked a great number down with atones, which they tore front the pavement, and dispersed the whole party. Fortunately the military were not called out, and on the retreat of Sir Philip's friends the mischief ceased. The state of public feeling in a place in which half of the population are on the verge of starvation, exasperated by party spirit and military execu tion, may he better conceived than described. " Sir P. Muagrav, retired to Eden Hall after the affair of Tues day. and did not return until Friday, when he issued an address, stating that he was favourable to a revision of the Corn Laws, and the substitution for them of a protecting duty. Sir Philip has not ventured to chew himself on the hustings this day, though he ap pears to be no way cnnnected with the unfortunate affair of 'furs day, except as being the innixent cause of it, and he has shewn the most humane solicitude for the sufferers and their families. "SATURDAY, THREE, P.H.—A terrible disturbance has just taken place in the Town Hall; I was not an eye-witness of it, but what follows 1 relate on good authority. Mr. William Brougham, brother of H. Brougham, Esq., 81. P., rose, and in a most energe tic speech declared that Sir Philip :Musgrave was forced on the freemen at the point of the bayonet ; that at that moment cavalry were stationed under arms within three hundred yards of the city ; and he protested most vehemently against such unconstitutional proceedings. When Mr. B. made this announcement, the uproar was tremendous ; the Mayor was with the greatest difficulty pro tected from the infuriated mob. Sir J. Graham insisted on his signing an order for the military to retire four miles from the city, with which he complied. He then adjourned the Court, finding it utterly impossible to proceed ; but on his retiring, was so roughly handled, that he is now seriously ill, and has, I understand, been bled. "The poll stands thus--Sir J. Graham, 206 ; Sir P. Musgrave, 19S; Mr. James, 107. "SATURDAY MORNING.--I havejust seen the Carlisle papers, which you will receive with this post. You will perceive that the information I have given you is substantiated in every material point, by all the eon-niilitery evidences, and could, if necessary, have been deposed to by ten times the number. It is highly im portant that it should be known, that • large part of the evidence given on the inquest and reported by the newspapers, especially such parts as go to chew the animus of the soldiery, and the cir cumstances attending Noble's wound, were not minuted by the Coroner in the depositions, as be, perh a p s very proper l y, di d not consider them legal evidence in an Inquest over Pattinson and Bet. sell merely. The only discrepancy lan find between my letter to you and the evidence on the Inquest, is in the number of shots, which I underrated, and in calling the irregular discharges volleys. l "The narrative of the Ministerial Paper, the Patriot, is at suer variance with the verdict of the Jam and, u you will Pre at a glance, with all the evidence which, [again Tepee! it, migh , h a , / been accumulated tenfold), except that of the setleant abovrm2i,- gonad. "These, I think,are all the facts ne circumstances connected wi,h the afikir, which I should feel jusdffed in communicating to ; and you will observe that I have strictly limNed melted* to the de, tail of such facia only u I have myself witnessed, or have heard stated to the Coroner and his Jury. I think it would only Lave been decent if the Editor of the Pairior had followed the sau l conrse, and had refrained from assuring his readers that those sal, diem " behaved with moderation and firmness," on whom &July had pas‘ed co heavy and within a censure. " I cannot close my account of the affairootwithstanding I h i " thrown no blame on either Lieutenant Luard's party, or the ling Of the fftith, without aiming that a high, and, I feel satisfied, just opinion seems to be universally entertained of the coura-i prudence, and humanity of the former and their commander, L c i that there is little doubt that the majority of the lacer did real l y fire their pieces into the air, and that the mischief' was au ,,, iy occasioned by the men who were opposite QOM. street." A EID COUR ,Il StAGH • Af T E O FE CUM P r o l i ; S t o u N k i : s e O R r E a DJ A N T a s O u ß rr s AT T reniesT. TOIN DAY. TRIAD al/ILTINGS. Baker, W. J. St. John's-street, Clerkenwell, orange.tne n ', Ant .... lienhamW. Richmond-buildings, Brightheimatone, builder . Brown, W. C. Coleman-street, wool-merchant ..... ... ...... m O er ld ch" Ken t t:r . o . a . d,. ........ m — lat in;ddrug gip, Farms, J. Red Linn.yard, Clerkenwell, brewer ......_ .. ~ . • "- Lindley, W. Colernan.atreet, merchant '' ' • • Medley, S. Watling-street, tallow-chaudier Millington, J. Bloom,dinry.square, dealer in philosophical Inorumen Bard,Mpnr Yif.jiVilehcresenteadar-s.qvulaaree,,, RI (.OVD NIRTIVCI. Bentley, W. Hinckley, near Leiceeter, grorer .... ............ Borrowdale, J. S. Coleman-street, wine.merchaut .• • • .. • .... ... .. • Bowen, W. Barnstaple, silk mercer. Downes, G. Liosehowre, colour-roanutlicturer rIRST MIETINOII. Bevil!, J. W. Oxford, emcee Csdey, W. P. and Browne, U. Winchester-house, Old Broad-stree, merchant: , Evel th, J. Austin.friars, merchant ...... . .............. Godwin, W. Stanmure, Middlesex, linen-draper ..... ""• • ... flail, J. Chesterfield. Derbyshire, grocer . ... Humphreys, E. and Bailey, 11. jun. Size-la va, drpalters .. .. ..... . I.srre, J. Strand, cLeviemonger Law-ona, J. Princes-street, Ratcliffe, chair-maker ................ Littler, J. Hudson, T. and Bowyer, F. W. Church - coac t, Cletnent'i lane, Lombard-street, drysalters . Manning. J. Kingston-upon-Thames, cloth-manufaetater . ...... Moore, W. Cirencester, mercer R. binson, W. V. Jermyn-street, hotel-keeper ............. R.dge, R. Park-terrace, Regent', Park, inanm.nger • Sumbury, J. Palatine-place, Stoke Newington, builder.... •• • • Thomas, E. Cherry-garden•strcet, Bermondsey, toaster-mariner.. Walker, W. Nottingham, hosier Williams, T. West Smithfield, cutler .... . .... • - DIVIDENDS. Bond, E. Wallingford, Berke, liners-draper Dunmore, J. and Gardner, J. tread Street, merchants .. .... Evans, H. Lamb's Condult•strent, llotn-draper Rlchard.on, J. Reigate, Surrey, grocer Sawyer, J. Lincoln's Inn field., wine-merchant Wessehaborn, E. A. and H. Upper Holloway , lodging-house keepers J CE RTIFICAT E. . John Hutch' YOB. LI me. etreet, wine-merchant—Benjamin Young, John's place, Camberwell New-road, Lambeth, earpenter—Wllllam r,0:240n-road, Surrey, brewer—Richard Andrew., X ingrbury-meer, Mug.- but vkluallcr—Samuel Forest Leach, Charle.ctreet, Soho, mude-tc rr WHaon, I.rmlngton, Southampton, Ilnen.draper—Francls and Crfditon, Devonshire, woollen-manufactures —William rx e w r: . l es.,, , ,,r 3 Li; Dgu er.gl 7: lr4 dealer end capallin--Richard Soper, and L l ) l . r E e rn r i p o:ddemonla,:dP Pa r k- lane, jrJones, pawnbroker. SORN : EXCHANGE t MONDAY, Jrv■ 12. Since this day week, we bare bad a good .apply of Oats 1 bat Mat of other grain has been short, and there were tut few fresh arrivals in this morning. Superfine Wheat met ready sale to-day, at full last kfciebn'. prices, but middling and inferior sorts were nearly unsaleable. Gnats? Barley, as well as Beans and Peas, sold freely, on terms quite equal to this day week. Oats were extremely dull sale, and In some latainet lower prices WMf submitted to to laciness, sales. SMITHFIELD, Movnar, Jv'r 12. Our show of Berta to-d:ty Is not Very numerous, bat there etill appears sufficient fur the demand. 'The quality Is very laferior, sod for these the trade is extremely heavy ; none Wit 'be Very primes' ending P',7,llstivra at So. The supply of Mutton is fair, but be trade is equally Leary, at a reduction of 4d. per stone from lad Ifondaf's prices nothing inn 'Ali o) small wethers reach 4s. 4d. 4s. being the general average cf those from 0 to 12 'tone. Lambs are plenty, and are down Calves only of the my best description retain la , t Mouday's prices y tied Prdlttary Ones are Wlt difficulty disposed of at all. 'HARRIED. 91 the Idth inst. at St. Pancras New Church, Mr. C. Ingrain. brae on. East Indio service, to hliss Ann Eastmoud Bridger, of Highgate DIED. At Cheltenham, on the 10th Inst. the Honourable Mrs.Vavasour, cf Haslewood Hall, Yorkshire. On the loth Inst. at her brother's house, Wilton-place, Knight•LrY Miss Augusta Mary Dubourg. HIGH WATER THIS DAY AT LONDON BRIDLE. Morning ..... 7 win. after 7 I Evening... 1G min. AMR SUPERIOR SEIDLITZ POWDERS. THESE Powders produce, when used es &rectal, Water, exactly of the same quality as that found at the celebiated Seidlitz Spring. The Water impregnated kith them becomes, in an instant, sparkling and effervescent, and forms an alterative Saline Aperient, as pleasant as Soda Water. They remain unimpaired by time or climate. Prepared and sold by the Proprietor,. Mears. G. MARSHALL and Co. Chemists, Brewer -street, Golden-squa re , i n B oxes , 4 s . 6d, each, and in Bottles at Vs. duty included. To be had as above : His Majesty's Salvolatila Lavender Vinegar Oxygenated Soda Powders Eau de Cologne Cheltenham Salts in crystals Arquebusade Water Ditto ditto, in etlioreseene.e Lavender Water Finest Calcined Magnesia Ditto, Perfumed Pectoral Cough Drops Ditto, Mille Fleur Aromatic Vinegar Vegetable Extract Camphor Tooth Powder Esprits—various Vegetable Tooth Powder Five Iloyale AUX Mine Fleurs : And every genuine Drug and 3 edicine, of the finest quality, : . or home and for exportation. Medicine Chests, of all prices, completely fitted for every Climate. •• • Merchants, &e. supplied on liber a l te rms . N.B. All other advertised Preparations ter making the Soda and Seidlita Waters,under the above names, are spurious. •,,* Prepared also, and sold as above, v er y su p er i or FRI:St 11 POLISH, for all kinds of tine Wood, Furniture, &c. SIMPSON'S ROYAL ELIXIR of LlFE.—This Me. dieine, from its balsamic and restorative qualities, fully me rits the above name. It was originally prepared by a Physician of the French Court for a late King of France, and the recipe having been purchased by the present proprietor, is most faithfully ad hered to. For flatulence, spasms, or gout in the stomach, its beneficial effects are unrivalled, as it gives immediate relief in such cases ; and no person subject to those alarming complaints ought to be without it. It promotes appetite, and gradually restores digestion in cases ot nervous debility, whether occasioned by a long residence in tropical climates, natural deficiency of energy in the system, or from a teo luxurious mode ot lire :* this Elixir will he found (on a sufficient trial) a never•fh ling restorative to tone and vigour. Gentlemen who occasipnally exceed the strict bounds of tern• perance will, by taking a dose of this Elixir, on retiring to rest, exempt themselves from the usual unpleasant effects of such excess the following day. This medicine is also used by distinguished orators of the senate, the pulpit, and the bar, as it revives the frame, and restores the voice when painful exhaustion is produced by long declamation and at the same tuna is so perfectly innocent. that the most delicate females and children may take it, without fear or alteration of Mt ir accustomed habits. It is sold in bottles, at I Is. each, including stamp, by J. V. Simpson (acting proprietor), No. 28, Hemietta-street, Covent gar. den, London ; at the Lihrarici; at the most fashionable watering. places and towns of Public resort ; and by the principal medicine. venders throughout the United Kingdom. A Fine HEAD trf HAIR the most Prominent . 1 rait of I V Beauty. To preserve t hat inestimable ornament to the latest period of existence is by the use of ROWLAND'S MACASSAR OIL. The ORIGINAL and GENUINE, a VEGETABLE PRO DUCTION, which has for many lean been universally admired; also acknowledged pre.eminent for wurishing the Hair, prevent ing its falling oft', or turning Oray. creates a Odd( Growth on the lair,lde baldest e p n la d c e e r s i n , g pr i o r d a u d c i e n s ir a .o l: l e y au s t l o rU ft i a t n fi d eC: i n e n g a N n t a i t y u ral Floo: fi ing, cil pro ducing beautiful Curls, adding a most incomparable, transcend ant, and beautiful Lustre, rendering the Head Dress truly enchant. ing ; is inestimable for Children's Hair. Ask for " ROWLAND'S" MACASSAR OIL, at 35.63.. 7s, 10s. fat., and 21e. per bottle. All other prices are counterfeits. Also, ROW LA NLYS KA LY DOR for the COMPLEX ION• Sold in Pint Bottles, at Cs. Gel., and Half Pints at 4s. 6d. pet bottle, duty included. CAUTION.—In consequence of the high popularity of the above articles, flagrant impostors have counterfeited each ; copying Advertisements, Labels, &c. To prevent Fraud ask for ROWLAND'S OIL, and observe the new Label (engraved by Messrs. Perkins and Heath) on the Oil ; strictly observing the Label of each article has the Signature and Address in Red, " A. ROWLAND and SON, 20, tlatten-garden." Sold by them, and by their appointment, by Mr. R. Hendrie, Perfumer tit his Majesty. Titehhorne-street ; Sanger, 150, Oxford street ; Mr. Smyth, 117, Delernix, 158. Gude and Pierce, 57, and D. Riale, 35, Bond-street • Holmes and Brewster, New Bond stre.l ; But kr, 4, Cheapside ; Bayley and Blew, Cockspur-street ; Berry and I loyd, IR, Greck-street ; Low, 330, and Prom, 226, Strand ;Bu (gees, 68, Holborn-hill ; Henley, Queen -street; At kinson, Gert ad-street ; Sutton, Bow Church-yard ; Edwards, 67, and Newberr, 45, St. Paul's Church-yard ; Barclay and Sons, 95, Fleet-mi tket ; Rartelott , 22, Hatton-garden : J. and T.Riggr. 65, Cheapsk'e ; Stradling. Exchange-gate ; Nix, fronting the Royal Excha :gc ; Taite, 41, and Johnstone, 611, Cornhill ; Col ley, 28, Biel opsgate-street ; Ford, Ferchurch.street ; Mattress, 1‘ and Jones , 59. Fleet-street ; Marquis, Colsoaa.spett t Swift, Wmd, 324, ond Sutton, 129, Holborn. --sowma t _ - . _ Printed at THE URITISH PRESS (Ake, by J. W. ntran and published by It. N - o:10. I I 1 . I° 4