The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-11-14 00:00:00

Friend wished to tome to trial, whilst he (the Attorney-General) did !tot really desire so much delay u the Pluoitter himself would thus be the means of creating. When last term he moved fur , a trod at bar, he did it for the expecte purpose of *winding the predicament in which the Plaintiff was now putting I • ; he did it upon the footing, that the Demo' ter was to precede the Trial at Bar; and it was hut candid to him to say, that lie was pursuing the course he formerly had comment-ed. Suppose that the question of law were decided, sod that their Lordehips bad detertuiued upon the atgnment in Demurrer that the justifi cations were had in law. the course of the trial would then be deer, there would be a judgment of the Court that the justification was worth no thing ; the Plaintiff would nut be entitled to go to trial upon the general issue; but the Jury would find damagea aecordingly. Seppase, en the other hand, that their Lordships should think that the justification was supportable in law, then it would be clear that if there be any excess, the Plaintiff would only be entitled to Damages fur that excess; and if there appeared to have beer no excess, then the Defendant would be entitled to a verdict, end cousequently have judgment in his favour. Every i thing would thus be clearly decided, and there would be no confusion in the trial, or in the argil- meta, for an uninterrupted road would he pre- 'cuter' to both parties. What he asked tor, lie , fouudsd upon what Ahe Learned Serjeaut had him- ' self stated. MP. Serjeant SHEPHERD here corrected die Attorney-Cieneral, by observing. that what he hail arid, or meant to say, was, that %livelier the point ef 1 law were argued by motion, or upon Demurrer, it produced neither advantage, nor disadvantage ' to the parties; but that the postiemerneut of the trial would be prejudicial to the Plaintiff. The Areouritv-GEN eau. continued.—lie had no doubt but that was what the Learned Serjeant tied intended to ally. but that he wait sure he (Mr. Shepherd) did not so represent it as he (the Attorney- General) had taken down immediately his words in writing, and he was much surprised at what they had conveyed to his mind ; but he would be idly wasting their Lordshieue time were he to rest his ar runtime upon what the L d Counsel did tint say,-or did not mean to say. If the Learned Ser. jeans did uot nicest to say what he conveyed to his mind, be (die Attorney-General) did Pet mean to rely opus it.and would argue that the mode of pro ccediug Dow proposed conveyed advantages to both parties. If each of them thought they were in the right, their mutual object must be to present the questiou in as clear e view us possible at the trial. it caskl not be doubted that this mode pre. owed the matter snore cleady to the Court, and if it dill so. it was Doody an advantage to all the par ties concerned. fie had formerly stated to the Court his reasons why he thought it would be iticeo convenient to have the trial at Isar miter the De murrer shall have been argued. He asked, not only fur his own lecietit. but for that of the Phiiii tiff, that the order should be trantmeed, and that the De nutter should be argued before the trod toi k place. He thought it was the course that mould prejudice neither party, and lie fruited that their Lordships would see minim to adopt the Itule already granted. Loot Eeteasoarinutt, in giving his opinions, tested, that in arranging the proceedings of the Court. the Court did not look so much to the ins tuedime wish or coomitience of the parties, as to the co n ve n i enc e of 01,t.i.)in g ultimate justice to be• edmini.te-ed to them. If, therefore, upon a view of the case, it were toned to he very much for the cioiveatience of obtaining it full and Clear edini tiisteition of justice, and a saving of expense to all $ pieties (cad erre die party now resistmg ii), the Co irt would Rod it proper to grant the appllcenoo. As in every case it ass found expedient that the point of law should be made clear, the trial of the legaley should therefore precede the trial of the hour. In deed. according to the general practice of the Court, they in ell cases whets a Demurrer occurred, or dered that I/mutterer to be tried before the general issue, so that Om Judge might kuow bow to dime" the Jury. Ile had fonud the inesueeniewee. and - had memo to complain of due lisle met having been adopted, no later than lest Sittings, when peeinatur-ly an issue was toed. although is point of fact the PI • •ti was not era led to recover open the derision of the Demurrer, that Demurrer embractug the whole eaose of litigation. Tants the emus, of Sir Francis Bartlett teem Colette" it did tint prevent the Densurru and the Casual Issue. If the Learned Gentlemen should coislood win arstivite plareru, would it not he convening for the Joiy to know ..vlietlier theiustification. if sifted. were legal or not % The Learued Serjeant ha' said, that if there be an fiefs. it should he doe ' eel in favour of the Plaintiff ; hut very Jiff relit would be the mnonet. where there was De pretenee for such a !teepees, tt being wholly unjust is all its parte. Even if the verdict were in femur of the Plaiettff. in regard to the excess. yet if the plea of jai...lit:titian were uot good, theme he tenulil he under the necessity of eons. ing to a new trial for a greater quantion a do nates; sail he wash! he under a similar neetreity, were the reedit* to he against him; re* he emit 1 toner to the Court for some supplementary justice, which wreald not he found fur him iii the re plication to 'lie eseess. The eormeniettee to joie. lice was in this mode of allowing the Demurrer to he decided first, for then the Court would have heard the arguments, and clearly decided the law of the ease. There could lie no tin rertaiiiie in their proceeding* on that trial, hut the Court knowing Chet the ms•ill •etion was illegal in form and substance. would direct the Jury to tied a larger entiseure of damages due than what they coedit de under other circumstances. Upon the record as it stood. the Plaintiff might recoret motet itieseges ; and therefore if the I'l tintiff looked to his own advantage. be would hod Mat it consisted in the Cosa grandee the Rule. Mr. Jostle( Coß4as4 said. that Vie expedience to lii-ti:e and to the riehta of the parties had Moil en lucidly explained by the Lunt Chief Jesting, that he had not a doubt on the seitject. It seemed cleir to him, that the Ins, of the case ought certainly to he decided ON before they came to trial on the ties. If this were not dose, they 'multi be pre. 0 10, resetting in obscurity and ancertataty; Ma. on the contrary, if the law were first ireplamed, the Judge !mild know what ha had to direct, sod the Jury would know *hit they had to do. In assessing damages, there must he a very great difference in the amount, if the excess was committed in pur suing legal. or din pursuing illegal measures. Ott this ground alone, therefore, it ought, in the first place, to be ascertained whether the justification entered upon the record vr.is anod or not. Hut its every way of considering the qm stunt, lie was de cidedly of opinion that the rule alt u.d be made absolute, and the demurrer argued before proceed ing to the trial. Mr. Justice LAWRENCE aka concurred in the opinions of Lord lillenborough. lit the present instance utile were duce actions aristii4 nut of the sante transaction, and proceedings instituted against three different persons fur the diderent parts they had taken : one against Mr. Abbott, (or netting the warrant ; another against Mr. Coleman, for earCiit illg it; and a third against Lord Moira, Constable of the Tower, fur receiving the person. Its one of these so intimately connected together. an issue in law hail been pined. and it was evident this issue must come to be determined by the Court. either on the Demurrer, or oil an application after the trial ott the facts was ove►. As it was admitted that it. must be determined by the Court, it was im pose:tile that elicit determination could alter the determination ou the record. The question then wa., whether it taus expedient to clear the way for the July, by' determining the law on the subject before or after their verdir•t. In point of expen.e told convent...icy, as it was admitted by the Learned Serjeant that the point of law must arise and be deterniineJ at one period or other, it was necessary to lurk whether. as the damages must thereby be adrcted, the lavr should not lie settled first. By adopting this course. he could see no po , ..ible inconvenience to either party; and on the contrary it was not even suggested that any injury could be done to either party, or any Armitage he given. by trying the fact before the law was decided on. Certainly such a (node would be an embarrarsinent and inconveuieoce to bo• h. as, if the law was not first ascertained. very different damages from what were right. might be assessed. Ile, therelore, oa all these considerations, was de eidedly of opinion that the law ought to be deter mined on the Demurrer before they CHM to a trial on this record. Mr. Justice BAILEY entirely agreed with the Lord Chief Justice and his bred:rem that the trial ought to be postponed till after tile Demurrer was decided on. 1 Ilia was for the millet mercy of the Judge, of lie Jury, and "cry mn.•h for the conve nie• cc and advantage of both parties. It was clear that very I i tie rrnt damages insist be given in a rase where the wiry had to answer for a whole trespass, Ind in a case where he had oily to answer for ■n in executing what was legal. Now, unless the Court knew to what degree damages were M enefee!. they mid the Jury would he embarranwil in their proccediar. Were they to assns damages for the excess. and contingent damages on the fu ture determination of Ma law t This appeared to be a less straight.forvrard course than t•• hare the .aw decided kin, and had not one advantage to re commt oil it. On the contrary, by trying the ors tioti of damages first, they might injure the PlatinitT i n t wo way■—!fast• 'nigh• i.jur.• him by giving only to the amount of sit excess et ~,,, tinted, when it might afterwsrda appear that the Defendant was guilty of a whole trespass; and they might injure Iniss in other point. fur if he twitted damages fur an excess in his action spinet Mr. Coleman, and theft went against Mr. Abbott for the whole trespass, it would he plentr.l in defence of thienction, that the same trespass ha 4 already hero tried, and the &mew, paid. fie did riot see that the Plaintili ectukt have any reason to complain of the arratito.. ftten* made by use Court, as he aught himsel f ha ve brou g ht on the Demurrer to be argued first ; a mode evirlentiy moat coodui•iva tit the e n d s of suhstantial justice, and most adviutagrues to a'a parties. Mr. &dram Snernerro inquired. what was the nature of the Rule now made by the Court? Lord Et.t.cmonaocou---4. the Rule is to pat off the Trial—that can only he done deAustely .w iodelinitety ; and in the present ease. the Court must postpone it indrAnitely, as the period of its cous'ag on depends oa other proceedings to be had fir.'. As moon ea possible alter the Demurrer is determined on, the Court will I ts to the trial. It is not thew wish that the Plaintiff should lose au hoar io bringing it to issue.". . . . The Caen was not crnwded with visitors. but the Enr was remarkably fall. WILLIAMS M. tit MIENS mama mt wARGILAI VINE 011 AMIIPACM Mr.RatuAnnsos snored (dr a Hate to chew canoe why the proceeding, in this eds., should nut be stayed. He stated that this was an action brought by a versant of her St:retie Highness, end that she put it into the hands of her Sol.citur. "dun on look ing em her pa l ters. found that the Pleintitf was in her Serum Highness's debt. and he had lit3irtdillgly brought a cross action, but could not find out the Ploissuirs residescq and his Attorney denied all knowledge of where be was to be found ; tinder which consideration he treated that their Lordships would groat the Kale. Lorg.t.t.cinottoucts.—u • Cannot the Defeo. Jest nee her ucconed on the trial, by the way of sebollf ?" Mr. RICIIARDSOII." My I.nrd, I am or that opinion, ; but the Plaintiff is a mere wriest ; and if tine came goes to trial. my client will not hare any thing to, recompense her, but the payment of her own costs. Lird Et.t.ttneitonntt —" Is not this motion regular, Richardson i• In my topiaiou it la; and you cannot expect that I shall inform yea how you should word your mot ian."—ltule refused. COURT or COMMON PLEAS, Nsysmssu 13. AUSEST r. w•LUn. This was an action for money had and received, and was tried before Lord Chief Jostles alall•• FIELD in Jane last, when a venhet wee given for the PlaintiL Mr. Serjeaot Lens MA nbtsined a Rule to thew cause why that verdict should not be set aside. and a atm-quit entered : end against that Rale Mr. Serjeant Suttees. and bla. Serjeant MMISINALL thin day .hewed came. A elNafall. it *appeared. had been entered into between Plaintiff and Defendant, dated Sept. IS. Is►o9, by which it was speed, that for every tel. paid by Maintain Defendant, the latter should rehire 1001. ita et's- titian Of liostiiiiirs between eng v .and and rriti,lP, had not been effected, mod the preliminaries of peace between the two con:Arica had not been signed, on or before the Ist of duly 1R 10. Prior to that period, however, the Defendant had become bankrupt, and Plaintiff, with many other persons who laud emit, ird into similar contracts. p►oduced his policy 1211 , :.'S 11. c ronnutssion, fur the purpose of learning what chante he ►toot) of receiving a divi detia on the stionlated sum, provided be wail sue. armful in his speculation : he found. hoviever. that the contract was illegal, and, of course. nuil and void. The Plaintiff, in the month of June pre ceding the time when the contract would be de ter ttttt led. brought his action for 401. the amount or pressiiiiin lie had paid, tor which the Jury gave him ■ verdict, which Mr. Si rj.iint LliNa sought to art aside ; tin the grotiiiJ, that, though there caa contract in Act, it had not a lauding operation, be hi,r, iu putu...f law, an illegal tratisuctiou; and that the ?LIMA!' should not be permitted to come into a Court of Justice. under such circumstances. to place himself in a better situistiuu than his own vo luntary act, in originally !sling away his motley under an illegal agreerneut, eutitled him to de mand. Mr. Serjeant SIISPHIIII) contended, that the verdict ought to be suffered to remain undisturbed, on the gr 1, that it hid been held by many Law Authornito., Illat, in cues where it ea. not legal to enter into contract% if the party payniz premium sued for his money !sick again, before the ►isk had occurred, that is, before the period to which the contract tins reptructed had detertnined--iiii that cur, he had a right to recover it; nod, in the pre sent instance. such reties bed been iustituted be fore the specified time had expired. In support of this opinion, he cited the cases of Lowry v. Verdun. in Douglas's Kepo►ts. p. 163; Allda. 0. Fletcher, 3.1 Terme ltepu►ta, p. 166: and Vandyke r. 14 East's p. 196; in these cues, the Plain. tiff. hail laud under illegal contrails ; they were. of course. ooneuiteyl ; bet ►t was held by the Wadi, that if they had brought their antiuns prior to the detervuinsit of the specified event% for the pre mium they had paid, they would have recovered. In the cede of.Tappendeu r. Randall. in the id Ikrosequet and Pa flee. p. 467, the Assignees of Tapprnden recovered the premium he had paid to the Defendant on au illegal insurance--the nelson having been brought prior to the time at which the iuseratice terminated. In the case of Le t:amide e. Whit•, where the runt had termi nated before the action was brought, though the Plaintiff did not obtain a verdict for the sous claimed cruder the terms of the contract. which, hke the present. Was in the nature of wage►, and the►efo►e illegal ; yet. under the direction of the Lunged Judge (Kenyon), he recovered the lut etium. The whole argument went to • prove that premium could be recovered, in cases where the illegal contracts on which it wu paid, were men fury. or in progress towards their termisatiou; but not where they *tree:tented. Mr. &leant Mt amlxt.s. Wowed N the same side. He contended, dint the instrument was manifestly voiii, under the het -44 the 14th Geo. 111. r. 48. sect. I. which was held in the - case of IL..ebeck fs. Haroiltou (being a contract relative to the sex of the Chevolie) LrEon). to mamma to is• simmers of even descripison, except marine in surances; and the Pbuntilf having brought his ac tion before the determination of the time cinsilein plated. he had a right to recover the premium. Mr. tiejrant Lusa replied is s most able menu men,. The Plaiinilf, he submitted. could not re. cover ; for, whether the instrument was dd. le esecstf•Jo y, it we. in von to say this was an aetion lzw•itzlst to resciud • contract. n h en,in lows there was sto miming which could he re1....4%01.rd. lie accu►ately pntnte•l out the distinction between the CAW of Lacreoade and White mid the other C 4,11 which Ins Learned Brother had advanced. The law would not allow of the distinction of eon. tniets exeeittril and esecutory. except where the con tracts to which• it applied were legal, Which tin. doubtedly was not the ease in the present instance. It had be-is a t►an.artion of honour. owl if the liankru:ney had not taken play', this action wontil not have been brought; the Plaintiff, how ever, finding that he was out likely to recover the specified sum, sought to °lonia the original pre m.& Bat a person eutenng into a contract of this deficription, stood in the same situation both before ■ad nft►r She event coutemplated ; and• he could not, in either case, rinse 'before a Court of Justice, the Sr infliction. loing throughout inert. casts winch had been cited. might, he thostol.t., he ',vitalised. with the exception of that of [Actinide against White. which w..i.t firtlier than even the present case de iipioded. lint lir prayed the Colin to recur to the principle which was acted upon long before any of those cases had been tried. viz. that when an individual ht•catne ■ loser by any illegal contract into which hr had vnluntaiily entered. he should not hare au opportunity of putting himself in a better situation. by going into a Court of Justice. The judgment of the Court will be gives ou a future clop Friday the Earl Annesley attended at the Police Oflke in Debe-seveint. Debi inomul comsplained that a false report had been circulated, that his Lordship had been concerned in calming the late disappeer once of the boy c died Earl Annesfey.—Messrs. John and Thome Lees also attended to answer his Lind ship's complaint ; and the parties concerned are ordered to attend co Monday next. The body of the Hon. Capt. liar Drttlanoso was found in the Earn. at nine ,"clock no Tuesday morning. exactly 0 hours after its submersion. It was nearly half a mule, by the course of the river, below the ford, which he had ro unfortunately at tempted to pees. It was immediately conveyed to Dopplin Castle, and deposited in the family vault. On Monday a shacking occident happeoed to a fern ile servant of Mr. Slitaws4.l., in Upper Eaton -street, she wentupteo pair of ataiirs to maks the beds, and clam the back windows: the latter work was her own free will. as am had been desireft by her iniatreas not to do such work, having 'xis:newel an accident in fallisor from a sinclow. She was missing upwards of two hours, and was at length found in the card lifeless, having fallen oat of the two-pair of siisira eit,dow, itli her skull terallr dashed to pieces. Yealerday, !Play with rubbing John Hill, Thaitiesdorect„ Mho. as It appeared that the Pro (whom he 11 3 1 11.1111M0 moms butnerset • House, to merit e ar titer sailor who kurs Slo an, , Hank mitre ; he ininired a l for lite notes, as he stippose w litre he wattled to send to an Agrui of the name an emaiandated him with some politic-house together, and that the house, tau laical naked It he emnptied with, and a I forcibly took it trots him, gold seals, sods gold them The Prosecutor wan he had thank, that he ha hums: in whack lot was rob lowing day, the Proem:atm, sailor, WI at 10 a holler liCatittg .4 his watch, Sac. kartit that the other author Ina sad that she Pewee, rubber. Adkins the IFh;w at sent ft,r, and he was taken Atter he had been in ciraturt hall taketi plate, 6c was disci Isunilwr out • width, *kidl be had litk• day 011.10111 the 1 . 1.11.4a.ry It iktiluticrl 1010: his propert3 been taken ..11 . ; time guld ka retained the a web, and prui Came 110 rodetau it. Ina rew at Ike Amp to take it out detained Into, The a.cuunt (Ile Pohlman . watch w.,a, that he bought 3luatlay inseam( after posttivel. to the P. the ...deli nit the Iliw6l ui I l'its Prisoner, after brit% the robbsey, and stated iSti e rld, a notarises eliandt.. skids and seals tel the Pros , ksown character, tiattaphr , time Ott his Wittig put to Int.k. r, produced a cold set, nivel' 14 MS part of the propel latt• Sir Perryman said lie . one who ' , awned it, in cu Charred Prisoner, He . _ . &mad cre.wi t , ...111.11 4 rick, clamed wish s io •l. Jaateal-perk, ••U ‘I wn Nearly orp •silo ht. JanstS). H. Wile, the useserng. r 1-4.1 the Nett of Mrs Crow, nl3l was ordrrrd to find hail for luau made his escape. STIOP. LI M NG A woman of the most resi is (isbianal,lc style, was yea a piece of newts easatwie thford-alreet. N • scalwar as a paltheity of the sarl tttttt xsuti to which she is Air ha. esti it J tat basi. ss Abe coded at the Pruretatee, at some articles of carat/tie, r enact al the article 14e whi mantle. The Prusteatoe yet, .front ilte appearance I not think tt possible. IL, challenged the Praia.., WU& tamale 6,shimeall cavernt tits property. Ship race:ea. She was einem& The Llizaberh, C•k. brian, C yr. 'l'•re. ••ti , moutlr ; the former foi the Utter for Bomb•y. of D.votehoo, •ttd Kiel •re gone nut •o passer ioin their reinstate et MEETINGS OF Lemiarklll.lrenbl-, •e%, stork.e..ukt . Tlowsuo p.witi Juni. stll &SINT lkiitea.'llighlbc , 1)1V' Heart James Emmett and street, Soho, tailors Timone Phillips , Plough-cu Leaden, smecimat coessE OF EXCH. ****entans si es, Dinnat au • * Rotterdam e. Havabergb 29 4 II Algona 29 5 41 Pare* .. Dittirg D go )0 doortleaux ..... go l u Cadix 4tl •flee, Madrid — effect. Pak .suo • lA. Per 0; 1,1.1t.ws SO Naples . 44 Reran si Liv.P Venice N.C r.a Do.lso Lisbon 6 PILICti or In Mask 'lock .s • • p per ( - era Re4veed 3 pew Cent. Councils 4 per Cent a per Cent. Navy , Long Avow'. Imperial J per Cent Imperial Amarities. twain• India Stock WaskaapecrEilb Commie for 10 MIR . • :e1:Eatiiiire,e,.:...1.7,...,:a:1e21Ei1..:0:1" iunie63.l i.,;:a Pr:r rt ; . ~,,,,,:',,:i,Y14.,41.4.:.,‘,1.eitth.a:0.a0ti..1.-hc1eaci1:keatm:::hrhic,,,•E1..11.,1.14.,';',11.1...k'im5"i5inyei.:1(1.4.11:1,,1...01:::1ity.:11b11,41,71.4.".:91.54,:::C.,:,,1t..r..cTc..ted'.1:,,t-..„M'.ii-..i,.. -.:.. , l p .. i r . : . iiii I them Siiv his set,. ; I R? v.. , • of Wright, in Drnr.- 1 1. ii-e Ink ea he was kh,..1 I ke h a...• . , ea' : iin, together with n gold ' L., ' . las f 4/ neech a:Tyrteil by ,I,;. $ 7 . :„, has not been able to ak i ' lm '! uhlud. O. the reeving i t' d '....' - !..r, aceutepasied by hi. i_ h o es , of I - . sort fur saihott. i n ner . IV Ilea, 10 lin•ir silo at ens iar ilr" '' ~ had he t ii robbed o f i herr ' V..' erre for w a • stioprete.l of b,... . I street Officer sae in r '' . v., os., . ‘, 1 en into tweedy for the idf.., Ludy some how sal as iarro.. : .iectiorged On all appik.4.; lit* in 01•111,1fi4fe.Strril lan ' ken in pledge lii th e t ver's, , i took piece olawb the i , , - -- i i uly ; but the chino aad l a w s 11 I key remained. Th Out. i promised t u • stup th la t ., fi ' roc day* after, the Pr.ss,s,,., 1 0 pledge • oticu the pas. ,t 1 /V Mit Oil of hie pineal:int d 'lc ht the duplicate of a lint . . i.d. e the tobliviy, but the peseta .4 .. 'r aware being the wan ebs pa the I - Osbert . log us restudy some One, r• . th. P I that his companion ir... • t....i mita, and that be had paverd Prwerretur. Itriztit loin 1 ti): hre.)e apyrelecedWl hint is a. Lwir. u Stir hat, Mr rfrqmme, api . la tea,' whicb he Lad t doubts, i rate we l ly stoles hr../ the 1 1 ,0 k rot or Jut out bell,' Itrizlo s.• t i t 4 ewesealtee,nee of whir r Lc e s . . ile He..), will C.,lllloiliedGli Ital. ..: CI eght too the cash*? of 1 sha . Alf' it horrillie and iletebtaHe . ...In loved:ip a reoneg ahuvt Klee o'r • Di . e.raktee. tie ow drrcied by ekns,:itig le the office Of W he kesp, t lie staWe ye r d- twe. 1 " ail the cuistledseauuar. The MO SI AILLSORLoten..IIIIT. &VT G riTltAttitillN•Wi. esioetable eppearsinve, .144 4, 11 euteniry charged with 1144,!;:;•1 0 1. 'ie, ',ilk. Si. el ii howl LA... I',. ar tow...twine the Privraw; 4. Ur H rt auuld Haul wive* tl in,• - a ia attached; snake it to aa), Ana wi in • fancy Lade far tone I. one's ahop, lust nquisird 1,. IP.' • atin in doing Fa, slit f..1.0,,-.1 . •* 11114:b the •as charms, tie.:-. Se..! . r nesper tea he bad 1..,, J.' i . f••• wad eddies., to lb. P1,10.4,1r, 4., TM i . :e, however, to who. iN't Wll rye , oh:fatale, wen eta idiug •ruh • Kt ad awn/Le: lett Wroi„t 6. lir, • war ottlaiiteil lint!l ati mil r .. 11 mine! Apr another clams ‘,,... i e t. Hv??,,,, and the C' fe ''s idled to. ,llooday hum Yor r.i mar.. and Benical, a. -- • ‘ i • Dr. 14%oftsoN .%uovect. I .' ‘,. event! (11ficens of the arm . . 6 ., ',engem in the Cambrian, . bile, t Ceylon. 47 . ..................... , i .tu ri a l: i. it : .A T ta,iLutiAL . L . ~..,."..,: i'e.green, Falhant, 311,14 - • . z. -4, r• kintlewerk, Storey, ton.-s. - „, t, .• : .11be,a cordwainer • I 111 VIE) fr!N IN. d James Emmett, Garrard. - - • • gle-cuert, tonallird- drat. ea: - - `1,.. 7 -.--............. 2- -,, - RANGIF., Fat DAY. Nog. g• ...., 1 E. (nowt° - Rio J awake - • • 73 • • t.'. Malta .. 61 tU. Gihrolter 34 11.1 DOW" 9l ~... v. Cork lob HULLO'S. .. Pot-toga! tW.1.1 in Cote ~ i. anti Earl per wt. 4 • 71 I. Foreage I; ofd in I —• RM. Or. Blew Davi/intim.. • ‘., Ncw Dollar* Silver iu Ben ' Piro Nrw Louie-teach) —7• .. eel: Agio 013 tbe Beek of Hsi I. pet COIL I , • [VCRS YESTERDAY .... 24 , .1 tqt 0., 11S1 6 :,‘ , • rd .• Is 1 i , . at. .• • 641 I-10 sl i du 1,. . 11l th.: I' • a 1 IJr • i T. SIAN, Sleecle•Sra er a V, tee 13 : 1 : 1 h ad : I I : s r :I I it...pit h il i a re ld i S n ie l :r fi l y re ranslawrm ek : rur' er7 : : : :: . . .. : . .: i rc ::fiet:ne:t.ill:tiii.telivelisri.:l7allis..7.,l":...i.Lif!rar.:emle,.....l.ltiet.:ll.l.. isawßilte.trhaGn;bre:::lTar:Ca,;:t '- a . ' ,. . : I,. . ( t ., : t e j:l Nl A...l7ely eli ti. ; e i disi • aa s e. , r___vjii : :..io‘ r : t :: h mfx s an ht :an r . e d. • er % : 4:4 r ; iiDt :, u :: : : 1 ..., - 0 the Odbee, • ..1 ruhlklatu et a." 4 " Leit to. meats an trre' ve No. a tt ailr li i i -"--- 111 - E..' 4• 8311...11: s M " On Illsivrolsy hot, the Bart. of Illtrairsto.l: firm& 'file %pow of the nine , Intel% .1, livered of a sou, of Duke of Valentin. In %Inv:aryl ...trert, nrret Way Mlle, of a daughter An Thursday the tat of r.k, the Rev Mr. K the Duke of ttrun.•hk's daughter of later liestrue Oa the set 614 at Ca.' . •ore nl I.wateonnt law of bur R.,hert HIGH M. 11 I.R, THIS Morn. 54 mu abr.' I I .—Printed awl r4hhabetl at the Odd, ! 4 ° %trend; where Adger:au meats arc reren-ed. and 11 11 (rot pe;11, tem.i. Le e .j.beeme.! . SMITH. N " Vt 1117 E. No I *-• 4"