The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-11-23 00:00:00

His client was Dot accused of error in doctrine: his twit." upon stilt head was not questioned. The eniiiiiltiftt which his clicitt was dant:ft - ire entitled to make aiaieat the :synod was, you has de famed rue. ou have libelled my character, and have nut giaea me laa opp4rmnity of making my defence. Th, LOIN In CII ANICELLOR—Sappose halt a dozen person's were e‘rered ti e chapel, and tiny thought proper to velum s ilartli.tnl l , A... 1 C11....Mir the congregation, will any tuna tell me that thin court ern prevent them ? They must go another way to work ; there win antlrr court to which they most apple. I welsh! elan wait to Iran any gwitlemsit at the bar what is the precise mcaainz of r, Church l'(liwallip ? 7. Cal NO—The individual film circumstanced in rot admitted it I'm Lied 3611 7 , , pef, MO to tti;c l•atitiiim, until repeatanec. Vise Loan CUANCEI.I.OII—IS breach of twoutise of marriatte (-re of these ext.? Is not reveitan...e required for thin moral alit ? lneacii el unmake may be rometlmes an tow of an abominithlr a acture that the individual s:imild be hooted not scri:ty lett t• (re eta, tic else irti,a in whir:. it may tic atthmitted to the itidg- Lien: of the laity h;rself, if the connexion may not be Lena t 'Ore till. Mr. en mawtnnl.l contrent the aentenee of the Synod with the I.olotta dermition given of a indite I y Arintotle: that learned per t ;Lin anld n judge shetild hr ell cyrt-. f r tt•e pot crone of /Weir j:714- 1..C1. This was not the strut - to - 4: of tlic :Synod t any thrum wlto could tell that two and two ntabr could walk straight— savant 111: 7 . (Mlle 3 jc: - .i•l•rn • . 'there never WWI witiling IL; it ; it was perfeetiy„ ; it' nh wont had hold thiLe ode, the onornie, :ice et slot poold be quite tidal-eat. The it.tetsiitn of this church wan onmg to thin very elioi;e of ministers to torch crunplaimil 'the body lout become very powcif il and weiltl-y. They niav ma ',lr he itditieneett by these causes aril a be: a! itanumge, ef pew sent:, &e. Lot to turn out this congtes 'i'a' Loco Cits:ces:s.t.on—Wl! .. n does this Synod tnect ? C:+isf; —lli April i., ;hero any legal obligation upon The big; a C AN;.I: Limn them to tare: thst ?tin: . 0 t'ir7e ices ref. They meet on the 18th of April, foe the rtlfiltEae ui (IVO` tg yrca eh( •+. Ile would give them every tedulexcee; he would treat tine, with kind:iers ; he would not in. tcr;!irt them from Christian fellen ship. If the Court grant the nom, it will be call: tl upon next April for another. to •,..r e .:eitt the milk-mgt.:ion turn going elsewhere. and buildng saint ber slat el. for which, wlt an Ent:tNit liberality—a liberality that could : et he romut out of this courtly, they havealrmlysulfacribed 7,0001. tv r-a-k s!at inn of , citc!‘ IVillthe Court be able tc sxy it will ga a.. far , and no farther? Where will its jurisdiction kn limned ? If t!..e ronfrrogaritin go away, what will be the coon. % The: !•: stn property ; and his Lordship may spare Eta :::t tr will be en property for it to act upon. As tt . : n: it came to thin ehopyl from Scotland, and who, if w.. 1 t.:1!, tt*Ol:111 bt. !llPlrtli. their journey gave them pleasure; ,y we!: tivproved, tr.! raw the world. 1:pon the whole, he con. (*US: to b: of 'tech a nature, that his Lutdship was called • rt :t, ard wit!. etn,t, 1: r%• t'a4 for the Illanastent of the Chapel, and ▪ . s uto; et 1:e..1 exhausted by the ingenuity and the kern- V: obscrvat;tins on the subject would be few • .GCI.C. ,ec observations he found it requisite to make, on • 7.t of thr rack, wealth, and consideration of his clients, who ik.a, r•-io .:1 in this chapel. LO:tD Ct.".Ncy.t.t.na—lf Mr. Fletcher. In going to his pti,iiit in the discharge of his duties, is disturbed and prevented t. en, doing. he must yn to the common law for redress. appeared neither fur the trustees nor Mr. Fletcher. 1 :c ; fer tile inanngioi, and as fat as they were concerned, the runt absurd C'St. that was ever bottight into that Court. cue called upon to prevent the collection of alcove by the Syr: , of Scotland, to ialuott authority they did not at all defer. '1 hey paid no .aliiry to ILO IiftPCIILT j all the contributions—all the rad Foy. were in the hoods of the congregation alone. Why was odotetion applinl for ai,t-diist the trustees? lkeause they were litih!e tc commit error? I:very man was halite to err—every trustee v to violate his trust ; bait en injunction would never be • t-d or: account of this mere liability. '1 Oasological books had b.eii isfatr.iil to during this ; he bad never heard that such die.* firmed a rule for this Court ; if they were to be the role, it? would advise these valor; studants who were to succeed lure era his Erathers, ai, he misted, a relOtOC period, in that Court, to give up these legal characters with whom they were spending their pupillage, And transfer themselves to theological instructors. Ir!at a question is asked by these persons ! They require that the manperra do not collect money; that is to say, they require a I atila,:nn of that condition upon which the entire trust depends; in the :heal the' is called tile congregation. Air. RAIT lIIIT It is called the Association. The Lou t, Co.excxxxon—l'etlinps you will tell me what an associated congregation means. Again, certain rules are to be ob. served ati far as they are applicable to England. How is a Judge to know a ivat is applicable to England, when he has not a particle of evidence to show him what the rules and institutions of this Synod are ? How then can he distinguish between these which are applicably to Englanai, and those which arc an to Scotland If it, was true in reason and in fact, that some are applicable to one country, and some to the other was it not eqttally true that he shoulld . know thesn institutions liefere lie could decide upon this relative fitness ? Seeing all, he may prorcuncc that all these mad tutiens w.re tit for England. Sieving all, he may think that but some were applicable to this country. How can any Judge predicate this if tie have not judicial evidence ? Suppose that the sentence of the Synod were to be executed in Scotland, it wmeld be so framed as to meet sere constitution of Scotland ; but if it were to be executed here, it sh.ml4 he so framed as to meet and agree with our ecclesiastic laws. This sentence may be gond either in whole or in part; it may be posed upon matters in which the Synod had no right to decide. a! - . Fletcher was suspended for breach of promise; the Synod might have no right to decide upon this question; upon this sob. ICet he had not a panicle of evidence. Ile could not receive the law of Scotland upon the affidavits of dissenting ministers. When sitting in the Lords upon appeal cases, he was presumed to know the dery of Scotland, and he could rail for evidence; but when he w :4:id down to this Court, he was naturally supposed to know no. thiiitt of Scotch law until it was proved to him. r. HEALD doubted much if the Synod were in London whether they would persevere in their sentence, when they saw the congre gation ass not hostile to 31r. Fletcher; • they would say they sus pended ,Ir. Fletcher for not appearing before them; that the sus pension was in fact their attachment to make him appear. He would assume what would not be denied. that this Synod was a Cowl. No matter what claims they may arrogate to themselves, Ise qeulil consider than as a Court acting can conformity with, and soopnned by the laws anal constitution of their country. He would rt,t tank them higher, and he would ask if it were not a new thing for a (:taunt to come ferwanl and ask the Court of Chancery to sup port its aitilinity be an injunction ? This very Court of Chancery fait cr. ry do; the inconvenience of nut being able to support its am: deertio. It was usual to see, as matter of record every day, that A. I'. C, were out of the jurisdiction of the Court. The Le godatore !are its assistance, anal to prevent injustice being done, lt tabled the Court to run as if the parties were present, but die 00141 could not do this of iteclf, anal therefore the Court of Scot ian : car Oct Call upon Chancery to aggravate its process by a decla ration of eonttnipt. If the Scotch ti:oort issued its !nous+. and o ,wed rt.st enforce its scutence, this Court would not give its a .sistari:... The LORD CtratteELT.ol—Suppose there was a congregation of 100-50 in ll::glaud, the rest in Scotland. and the 50 in England were inmed (or the other Sip to obey the Synod, and if this agree me.' %vete made hr decd.. I cannot tell whether these would be r-ally bound, until I know the institutions of the Synod. All particularly thus: who coinp lain, must show that this sen. 1,.3:e is strictly confonmilik to the rules and institutions of the h•ipod, eipecially if the deed bear anything doubtful on the face u: it. Suppiese, as in the present case, a gentleman acted so im to a lady as to be guilty of a - breach of promise of if...triage. There arc slut a thousand other matters, in which it •e::ld not be expected that this Court would be auxiliary upon tnar occasions. lie knew nothing hire of Scotch law, except in tile affidavits of clergymen, who depose that the inister was ap po.r.ted by the consent of the congregation; but the defect was, that hr was not told how, when a Itlinister wan suspended, the place was fi i!ed up. This is as a serious defect, especially when th e deed told him that the consent of al I was necessary. homy be. that these persons bad ignne to a certaf: %%tent to entitle them to the benefit of the Act of Toleratior.; they might say so and so with this intent, and yet Usey might covenant themselves out of thin very protection, and it was a question if this deed were not of this dmaiption. He cannot ti d in this deed if Mr. Fletcher is to receive money during his 'A.:pension, and yet it is admitted to into that he is. It is also ad mitted that his sucressors at: to get nothing. This is also omitted in the deed. lie aught then fore, on account of this distinction, to be most airerol in granting an injunction, particularly here, when the injunction would almost deride the cause. Be must again repeat, No parties must not tell hint of their meanie;. lie would look at tt..: deed and say, there is your under,tandine. • The So Lim ITOR-fl It X I: li•t. sail, in reply, that he had to con. siclar two claims of objections—these made by his friends, and those thrown out by his LA:mishit). The former he would treat with ; and though the latter were not to be thus treated. he would venture to assert he would get over them. As to the idea of the Court not being come-vent to restrain a inieter—if this was assented to. the Court wouhl repudiate. emasculate, and ener vate one of the most important branches of its duty. The Loan Citaweextoa.—The question is, whether a trust be raceuted for the benefit of an individual preacher' If this pecuclier get nothing, where is the use of granting an injunction? ei like the continuance of a partnership, against which, If an ruder acre grouted today, it may be broken to-morrow. Sop. re.c the Synod to say to 31r. Filcher, " IVait and keep your situation tdl Wednesday; we will consult the congregation, and if they c'enient, we will dismiss you." (could this not be done under tie treat? Suppose they were t.. say, "Keep your employment f..Ar a month, and no longer, would this Court grant an inhmetion on the day preceding the last clay of the m ont h? 'lies Court surely wouhl not grant an injunction that would be dia. so: red the moment the decree was pronounced. The SOLIC:TOS-6ZW ESA L said there was an objection that the 4 was no precedent far this measure. There may be no actual identity. but there was a similarity of principle ; no precedent for restraining a 31inister. What would the gentlemen say to a motior. foe preventing the ringing ot a charch bell, by the s lid Elowani rad the churchwardens of Hammersmith chapel ? This order seas wade, and until the ease occurred there was no precedent. But whets it was decided by lAird Macclesfield, and the decision sup pmietl by two most able commissioners, theChief,lusticethlbert and Lord Raymond, it became a precedent, and remained so to this day. ',lily Howard was infirm, and was disturbed by the ringing of the bell at 5 is the morning. :she entered into a contract with the clierch: modem' to repair and beautify the church, if the bell was not tulles!. They entered into the covenant; she built a handsome cupola, and *Moray atter a vestry was called, and it was deternimed to ring the -- - hellos usual. bhe hied her bill for a breach of t! covenant ; the lawyvs of that day (41 rot raewe•r aith the Plealll2o ll ll of'• there is no proccilmt," and the injunction teal crap: , •d. and the hell was silenced. What world his friends think if an injunction was granted to restrain an anthem from a• iting playa for Covent gutten or 11rory.1sne? Yet this v 11. e case. %Vhst will Mr Dart Pay to this? What ! i:as• t.•• intrl!•ctual chains—a practice worthy of Morocco or Algi.a ! Y.: this was done by this very Conn. Lonll CTIAN ctir.t.n R —Tile CIRe. this: 3!r. 3Jorra and ' others were the proprietors of dr. limy:ma:al Theatre; Mr. Col -1 m a n and 01112,4 joined, and conceiving the theatre would be pro. thirtive if they hail th t ai!canta;•" of the fruits of Slr. Colman 's ge. :sins conked to the hefts.•. y entered into cotenants accoteingly. The Sol.tctmon-DE . :l:n it. wool.' put 11r. Fletcher into't!,e e:on•r situation with the thutchwardets and Mr. Coleman, and would ask for an injnoctimi 0o preckely the same princil•le. Did no! nit iris luirmil frit-ids know that a man was not allowed by that Co•tr•, to stamp a 'rt., head upon a rack of cards? The Loon Ctt a stcl:i. ho a —As you are now going to another head, you mu•.t !finish you: arl,•ument to-morrow. V!Ci:•Ci!ANCLLI.OII'S COURT, llloxn►r, Nor 21 DOI.IIY T. I.OWNDIf Mr. AGAR said that the bill which prayed for an injunction to r.-strain the defendant tit this cause front publishing and vending an t id piny, called A Nos Wonder, a Wnown wryer Vert, under the hie of A ionic on i. r Vesei ; or, The tridua y*Coriehia, had been amended. Mr. I.owntles. the defendant in the cause. addre.setl his Honour, and stated that he had undastood it to be the practice of the Court to give notice to a defendant when an injunction was to be prayed for. lie was consequently unprovided with counsel, and bents] to he heard by the Court in perton. The VICE-CIiANCELLOR said, that the statement that must now he made would ht.. necessarily ex pick. At the present time, therefore. the sktenclant could not be heard. The injunction was granted. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MospAY, N0v.72. CLZMENTSOST V. WILLIAMS. Mr. Dzirxas inov..4 for a Writ of Pre:itlotion, to restrain the Arches Court from proceeding farther in this CAIV4C. It appeared that the Churchwardens of the parish of Trong, in the Diocese of Lincoln, drtermined on making certain alterationa in the parish church, which, to the maisri•y of the parishioners, seemed unnecessary: and they aceordiitgly expressed themselves to that eftixt in vestry. The Churchwardens, notwithstanding this, did make Ow alterations. 'f he parishioners considering them no longer tit to till that office, Mile to the resolution of removing them [runt it. For this purpose it became necessary that a vestry should be held. And the Agth George ID. requites that notice of such vestry be given openly in the church. Ills (31r. Denman's) clients, to comply with the provisions of the statute, proceeded to give notice; but during the cessation of divine service, he was imme diately arrested by I_ lementson, foe a pretended breach of the statute of Edward 'VI., "against brawling.' For this Williams brought an scrim:, and recovered nominal damsges. And now he was cited in the Court of Arches to answer for this pretended breach of the statute of Edward VI. Ile (Mr. Denman) further conceived that the cave could not came within the jurisdiction of the Arches Court, except by way of appeal from the Bishop of Lincoln. _ _ ----- The Court granted a rule to spew cause. THE ZINO V. COOX• Mr. TAVIITON prayed the judgm ent on the defendant. The case, he said, stood over since last /1 onday, to enable the defendant to put in affidavits. He complained that the residence of thedefen dant c.eild not be discovered ; it had been said he was sick: if so he would not press the case at present. but must expect that • physician be admitted to se: him, and the true state ~f his health ascertained. Mr. CAMPBELL. for the defendant, produeed the affidavits of his bail, medical attendants, and nurses, all declaring the defend ant's health to be in a dangerous state. TA .7 NTO:1—W111 the Learned °Mikhail consent that a medical person from us should visit his client ? Mr. CAMPBELL said, certainly; and that be hoped some service might be done to his client by th eir physician. (A laugh.) _ , . . Judgment deferred. LIBEL ON THE MARQUIS OF HASTINGS. Mr. SCAR LETT moved for a rule, calling on the Proprietor of the :tondo, Vows to *hew cause why a criminal information should not be tiled against him, for a libel on the Marquis of Hastings, contained in the number of that Journal published on the 2.5t1t of January last. Considerable delay had been occasioned in making this application, on account of an informality in the affidavit of the Noble Lord, which wax requisite to sustain such an application. Accordingly, it was found necessary to wait until commutdeation was had with the Marquis of Denting% and an aides it prepared wh i ch it was competent foe this Court to enter tain. The affidavit on wiiich he now moved was sworn before the Chief Justice at Malta, and signed by him. It was directed to this Court, and in every respect drawn up in a suitable form to con stitute a proper ground for the present application. He was desirous of offering this explanation, for the purpose of pointing out the reason why an application was not earlier made to this Court. The paragraph on which he moved appeared in the Sunday l'imes of the 25th of January of the prrlonit vent. It was headed— " Threatened Impeachment of a High Personage." It was to the following effect : " Some important discoveries have recently been made at the India House. One transaction involves a deficit of upwards of three himdred thousand pounds. A person of elevated rank and political importance is alluded to, to terms which bespeak the feelings of the merchants of this great commercial institution. Already has the Court of Directors negatived a motion to grant a pension of live thousand a-year to the late Governor-General of India. We are in full possession of the facts. but prudence, as well as justice to the panics concerned, command, foe the present, silence." . . . . . In the of of Lord Hastings. his Lovilship deposed, that he believed this paragraph was intended to apply to him, and that he was the person meant or allude.: to by the writer. He further de posed, that during the time which he held the situation of Dover not and Comnian ler in Chief in India, from October. 1813, to the close of the year 181:0, there was not a deficiency is his accounts to the amount of three hundred thousand pounds, or to any amount whatever; that no charge was imputed to him of any deficiency in the public money ; that he did net partake or participate in the ap. promiation of any money for his own use, to which he was not entitled ; and that he not only declined to make any improper ap. propriation of money to himself, but that he frequently gave up several sums to which he was entitled, because be remit' his claim to them to be drawn from usage, and not to be sanctioned by actual right aed authority. His Lordship further deposed, that 'there was no impeachr , ent intended to be moved against him by the Directors and Proprieters of the Esst India Company, and that no imputation of that kind was connected with the proceeding of the Directors relative to the pension which it was supposed to be in the contemplation of the Directors to allow him. Here was a most emphatic contradiction of the charge contained in this paragraph ; and every allegation and allusion in it, as applicable to lard ilastiree. was talse and without timmlation. len these grounds he pubtuitted that he was entitled to the rule for which ha apid The LOAD CHIEF JeSTICE inquired if the Learned Conn srl rat prepared with al aflldevit as to the identity of the pro. pite.nr ataihst shorn he moved. !Ir. SCARLETT replied in the affirmative. The LOUD CHIN!' JUSTICE.--Take a rule. THY CIXO V. WATSOX•?D BLISS. The defendants were called up for judgment this day. They had been found guilty of an assault on Mann, at Bethnal peen. It appeared there wart an election in Betlinal.green parish, which created a great deal of heat and irritation amongst the pa. rishioners. The successful candidate was 3lr. Bruttom whose par- Osans the defendatts were. They, jointly with his other friends, eommemorated the victory by a public festival, and in the evening of the day of the festival there was a display of fireworks in a gar. den, at which the friends of Mr. Brutton, and, as it was alleged by the prosecutor, the parishioners generally, were expected to attend. The prosecutor was active in iris opposition to Mr. Brutton ; he accompanied a Mr. Derringer to the gardens, who had a ticket of admission tor two persons. The prosecutor Lad not a ticket, and was thrust from the dour by the defendants, who officiated as stew. aids fur the day. 'This constituted the assault, and it was further complained of by the prosecutor, that one of the defendants rubbed his knuckles across his mouth, so es to cause his gums to bleed. Mr. BnocullAm. on the part of the defendants, offered to alio logbie to the prosecutor fix the assault, which they now swore they deeply regretted, and which was committed under a mistake. Be was the more anxious that this should take place, as an Act of Parliament had been introduced last Seseion, which wee cal. culated to allay the beats end animosities which unfortunately revelled heretofore in the parish of Bethnal-green. Mr. Se AAAAA T i en the r ut of the prosecutor, declined to accept the apology. Mr. Boot:Guam then proceeded to address the Court in miti gation of punishment. The case was one that might hare been with greater propriety arranged in a Court of Quarter Sessions, than introduced into this superior Court. The assault was very trivial: it merely consisted in a thrust, which was certainly suffi cient to warrant and sustain the verdict. It was suited that some violence was offered by some person putting his hand into the prosecutor's mouth ; but it tint not appear by whom this was done, it haopened in a general sent Mr, and was not brought bor n e to the defendant. lie was satisfied their leirdships would sec that this was a prosecution brought and persevered in, less for the purpose of I promoting public justice than of obtaining a victory by the panic ' sans of one party over those of another. The assault was unpre. meditated; it occurred from a miaapprehension on the part oh the defendants. They now deeply regretted it; and under thee. cir cumstances, he hoped their Lordships would deal leniently with them. Mr. C. PIIIT.I.Irs addressed the Court on the part of the de fendant Bliss. There was this feature in the case favourable to his client; 112 was not accused even of having been the person who rubbed his knuckles across the mouth of the ow. Mr. SCAIILETT reied. He had proof not to have the de fendants brought up for sentence, if, previous to the trial, and sub. frequent convictioo, they would make a suitable acknowledgment and apology for their cooduct. This they refused, and from that day until the present they would not make any offer of reparation. They now expressed eamtritioo ; but he doubted the sincerity of that expression, for as soon se it failed. their Counsel was instructed in vilify the motives, and attribute improper feeling% to the pro secutor in bringing this prosecution. His client preferred trial in this Court to one before Justices at Quarter Sessions, as in par . chial matters heal iute.-ests sad partialities may sometimes taut. THE BRITISH PRESS. fere to deprive persons of that full and impartial justice which was invariably dealt out In elis Ciiutt. Mr. Justice HATLICT admoniiSed the prisoners. Thrse patty anitnosiiits were most mischievous., and fimivals to commemorate these party triumphs were highly injurious, and ought nut to be indulged in. The sentence of the Court was, that Watson pay a fine of 301., and a line of IW. to the Crown. TIM ZING V. CHEERE D E5Q..)11.1. PEanariv prayed the judgment'of the Court on J. Cheere, 111 amber of Parliament for Cambridge. 4. fler 31,. Justice LIT TLtDALE had gone over the notes of the trial— Mr. Scent. Erv, on bandit)! Mr. Cher?, said, that he would not now say anything as to the improbability of a gentleman of such respectability as his client being guilty of anything disrepute. hie, bat would Forted in the first instance to move in arrest of judgment. The indictment contained a peat number of counts. on all which. except the xecond, his client had been acquitted. That count charged hint v ith busing, by menaces, obstructed a clergy. man of the name of Cecil fiom performing the funeral service over a corpse in his church-yard; but in no count aces it stated that the ele:gymen was duly authorised to petform that service, nor was there anything to inform the Coast on that head. Now he (Mr. :leaden) contended that his client might do everything contained in that count, and yet rot commit any crime known to the common law ; for he world suppose the ease of the leaders of the Synagogue taking the dead body of a Jewess past the house of a clergyman, who may, frog some reason, take the body from them and inter it in his own churchyard, and threaten to move the Court of King's Itcnch against any person preventing him ; or suppose the case of executors wishing to inter the Isody of their testator in a certain place. according to directions in his will, and that • clergyman should insist on buryirg it in another place against their wishes, surely a person obstructing by menaces in either of these cases, would not be guilty °inbreeds of the cornnion law ? And what was there in the second count (the only one not negatived by the Jury), to distinguish the present case from either of the supposed ones ? It was not pretended Chet any assault was committed by his client. In the first count he was charged with laying hold of the clergyman (hut the word assault was not used in the declaration), and even of that he had been acquitted. The Lo anCH IEI J can es—Take a rule to spew LIMN why judgment should not he arrested. THE XIX() T. T. NEWMAS. The defendant was brought up for judgment ander the following circumstances :—lle is the pmprietor of an Inn at Barnet, and a rule of his establishment is, that anything that may be left at the Inn by any of the visitors. and found by the servants, should be brought to the bar of the Inn, and left there until inquired for by the proper owner. Lordl e remont left a gold.heteled cane after him one day that sto there. It was found by the waiter, who omitted to bring it to to r bar, but detained it in his pantry. Lord Egremont wrote the nest clay to inquire after it ; on inquiry it was found to be in powesrion of the waiter ; an altercation arose, in which the innkeeper committed an assault on the waiter. An indictment was preferred against the defendant; be was found guilty, and was this day brought up for judgment. 111 r. Justice BAYLEY approved of the rule which he had set down for the regulation of his establishment, as to the ow.a. that all articles found in the house should be brought to the bar; but reproved him for having degraded himself so far, and forgotten the duty of protection be owed to the domestics of his establishment, as to betray himself into the commission of the offence of which be stood charged atal onvicted. The sentence of the Court was, that he be fined 401. ARCHES COURT, Nov. 2. (Ikfure Sir Joni( NIcUOLL, ) BARKER V. SMIZZR. Dr. Jestenn stated, that this was an appeal from the Consis. tory Court, on the part of Mr. Barker, In an action brought by him against his sire for a separation by reason of adultery. From the circumstances it appeared, that Mr. Barker having married the lady, the subject of this action, she was entitled to consider.. able property in Lincolnshire. left by her father. At the time of their marriage she was a minor ; and up to the period in which she attained full power with respect to the property they agreed very well ; at that ume they had some dispute about the nomination of trustees. The husband wanting to hate the nomination of one or them, the lady refused ; high words ensued between them ; she proposed a separation, which the husband, after consulting his brother, agreed to; articles for this purpose were accordingly drawn up, and after they were executed the husband went to live at Bath, and the wife to reside with some of her friends at Teign. mouth, in Devonshire ; she there contracted an intimacy with a Mr. Potts, a Lieutenant in the Surrey militia, and with whom she subsequently . eloped. !Ur. Harker was apprised of the elopement the lady s mother, and immediately went in parson of the fugitives • they were traced to the King's Arms Inn. Hampton Court, and from thence to Kingston, when the lady was induced to return to London, and place herself under the protection of an ' uncle, with whom she remained about a fortnight ' • but again eloped front his residence, and went to France, where she has ever since resided with her paramour. Mr. Barker commented an action for criminal conversation against Mr. Potts, in which he °Stained a verdict for 20411. He subsequently sued in the Court below for a divorce, by reason of adultery, who refused to grant him the relief be prayed for, on the ground that there was some. thing mysterious in the proceedings of the parties, with respect to the articles of separation entered into, and other circumstances in the case, which the Lamm Judge there thought disentuled the party . to such relief. He (Doctor Jennerl had appealed front that decision on the part of Mr. Barker to this Court, and tendered 'evert' letters and depositions, by which the Court would perceive I that the separation was promoted orginally by the wife ; and that Mr. Barker had taken every step s. a man so circumstanced could Co to protect himself. These explanatory circumstances were, he trusted. sufficiently satisfactory to induce the Court to reverse the decision, and give the party the relief he sought. Doctor SWAISET argued on the same side at considerable length. Sir J. McNutt. deemed the explanation satisfactory, and pro. flounced the husband entitled to the relief prayed. MAYOR'S COURT, Nov. 21 TILE C01.0311111N GOVERNMENT. ItODION V. JOSE DE SAN MARTIN AND 0711E13. Mr. 80,. Lan n, in moving that common bail be tiled in disso lution of the attachment in this case, stated, that it was an action brought by .Mr. Ilodson against the defendants, lately or now styling themselves the Government of Mill. It would be recol lected that some time ago an affidavit had been put into Court from Mr. Hodson, stating, that the above mm-ti defendants had in curred a debt with him to the amount of 3,0001., for the payment of which he considered them responsible as the Government of Peru. The Learned Counsel lime proposed to read the affidavit. 31r. BARNARD, who was for the other side, slid, that he was ready to argue, in the event of the nrodurtion of any particular affidavit of debt, but he considered that the former affidavit had already been disposed of, by being withdrawn. --• • • Mr. lIOLLAND said his object was to put down the nonsense that was dinned into the can of the public upon subject of the re sponsibility of the Government of Peru for debt to an individual. Ile was perfectly aware that the thing was got up to tell upon the Stock Esehango The use he intended to make of the affidavit was to 'hew that tile money llr. Hodson lately claimed from Messrs. Jane D'Ariva Aguerro, Jose De Torres, T. Agle, and Joic De l San Martin, as the Government of Peru, and which was attached In the hands of Messrs. Baring, Messrs. Kinder, and Messrs. Fry and Chapman, was now claimed from Jose San Sliwtln and the others, as individuals, and not a Government. The amount sought was for manufactured goods. (Mr. Holland then read the affidavit of the plaintif f in which he swore to the debt as due from the Goverunient of Peru. Ile then submitted to the Court that no such Government could be recog nised, the highest authority having stated to thnt effect, that the defendants could not be sued as a Government, and linally, that the affidavit, or rather that which pretended to be an affidai it, was iu fact no affidavit at all. It had been sworn merely before one of the clerks in the Mayor's Court, and of course was not an instru ment upon which, if it contained a false statement, an indictment fur perjury could be founded.) _ _ • • - • • . - The Reco RIDE &wired that he should never ag►in hear cf this mode of swearing affidavits- If be did he should certainly adopt summary means of prevendn.: the practice. Ills Lonlship then granted the motion of Mr. Boltruid, by which the attachment becomes wholly null and void. Ile did this upon the ground of the in,ufficieney of the affidavit, stating at the same time that if a proper affidavit had been filed he should have given his opinion of the two other objections, but that was now quite unnecessary. It is in contemplation to make a railway from the Rennet and Avon Canal, at Alton liars, Wilts, to Fisher ton, near Salisbury, and from the latter place to Wilton. It is, we understand, in contemplation to erect a rew Roman Catholic Chanel in Lends, in addition to that al ready existing, which is found too small to accommodate the Catholic inhabitants of this town and the vicinity. PROVIDENTIAL EscAFL—Wednesday forenoon, as Sir Lawrence Palk. Bart. was goin; out for the morning, the* person who hail the care of the dogs being 111, a labourer, named Richard Bowden, was despatched for them, when, in crossing the lawn for that purpose, he was assailed by a bull which had usually grazed there, but always with a clog to prevent mischief. Bowden avoided his horns, but was knocked down by a push of the animal's head, who plunged on him when on the ground with its feet, and at tempt to gore his body with its horns, which fortunately hitching in the small-clothes, rent them asunder, giving the poor fellow however a terrible shake, but which most probably saved his life; for the hat falling front his head and rolling away, engaged the bull's attention, and Bow den escaped, though with such injury that it was thought prudent to remove him to Esetcr, where he was promptly attended by Mr. Amory, surgeon, who found two of his ribs broken. and several severe bruises, and, not thinking it right he should again he taken into the country, recom mended a removal to the Devon and Exeter Hospital, where he now is. —Dorchester Journal. POLICE. MANSION-HOUSE. Yesterday Larizzo and his wife were brought up for another exa mination, on a charge of haying attempted to obtain money by forged voitioes. The Lone) 3laYoa sent the prisor.ers back to gaol, and directed that apvlicatiou shoulil hr made at the Alien Office on the propriety sere.ing th...n nut of the country. STATE no ra..acvrnratis Batnne.—.‘ gentleman attended publicly to complain to the lewd :%layor of the state of Illackfriars thitlze. Ills Lordship might be swary, that in conseluence of the recent work of illacadaini4irg and reducing the acclivities of the bridge, the carriagi road had byen greatly lowered in the cento. The font part ment, however, remained as it W3l, and was now up. wards of a gird hmher then the road, so that a fall into the toed ' was extremely dar,;.:er-ns. The Loan MATolliCtil!eiteti the nprliCint wnttld Make th:a statement before the Commiree of the Ccrporation who had the bridge under their control. Three had been two plans proposed, the one fur the melon of two steps from the curb-stone, avid the other for an iron railing for the protect ion of the passengers ; but it must be obseiyed that neither of these could immediately be executed. The gentleman expressed his intention of making the communi cation to the Committee. BOW-STREET. - - TOE CHARGE or Aas tor rloy Joins Carkr, the per. son cha-ged on suspicion of having set tire to a house lately occu pied by him in Mount Pleasant, Coldbath-fields, with intern to defraud tile County F:re.ollice, was brought up and undert•eut a final examination. Thomas rekburt, of No. V. Mount Pleasant. working jeweller, stated that he lived next door to the prisoner at the time of the fire. He saw the prisoner on the ruins the full ming morning. He said, This is a bad business, Mr. Clarke." " Yes," replied the pri , oner, "it is indeed a most melancholy one." IViutess asked him if he could tell where he was, and what he was about, at the time the fire happened; and he said that he was behind the counter counting up copper. Witness slot asked him where he first saw the fire; and he said on the opposite side of the shop, next the stairs. God's sake, Mr. Clarke," said the witness, "why did you not knock at my door when you came out, and also alarm your lodg ers ?" To this the prisoner made no reply. The witness next asked him where he went when he left his shop, and he said over to Underwood's (the Cheshire Cheese opposite), and that he was so frightened that they kept him there. Vileness said it was a very distressing affair, especially to his lodgers, who, ha understood, had lost every thir.g, and there was one poor man in the hospital who was in a bad stre from the bruises he had re. ceived. lie, at the same time, expressed a hope that the prisoner would do all he could for them, and the latter said no man could lament their distress more than be did, and he would do all in his power in their behalf. Several whcr witnesses deposed to the conduct of the prisoner on the occasion of the fire, and to the apparent smallness of his stock. On Mr. ALLEY (for the prisoner) being asked if he had any ob servations to make, the Learned Gentleman observed, that as a witness on the former examination had sworn that she saw the prisoner set his house on fire, he should deeline urging any thing at present, though he was instructed that there was a complete answer to the csse. The prisoner was then fully committed for trial, and the wit nesses were all bound over to proseeute. MARY-LA-BONNE OFFICE. VIOLINS A 1111AOLS DT A BENTANT.—Late on Banirday evening, Mary Habana, servant to Henry Fulton, Esq. of Maids Vale, Paddington, was brought before EDMUND GNIVTISH, EVA charred with a brutal assault on Mrs. Fulton and her infant. Mrs. Fulton (who had • violent contusion on the forehead) stated. that the prisoner was cook in her family, hut through her neglectful conduct had received warning to quit. She visui , el to do anything on Saturday last, when lira . F. desired her to leave the house. and she would pay her the wages due to her, on which the prisonerrose up and struck her with such violence, as to force her and the infant in her arms under the kitchen range, by which she received a se vere contusion on her forehead, and the infant was so severely in jured, that liitle hope was for some time entertained °Cite re- covery. A female servant of Mr. Fulton's stated. that Mrs. F. eame down into the kitchen, and desired the prisoner either to& bet work or leave the house and nn taking up a jag from the dresser. the prisoner struck Mrs. F. with such violence, as to force her and the child in her arms under the kitchen urge ; the infant fell against a large fish kettle, an 1 appeared at first lifeless, on which ' the prisoner took it up, and shoe:: it violently. Witness forced the child from her. The prisoner said, she had been at work all the morning, and only pushed4ter mistress, who slippoton the peel aim onion, and fell under the grate. She expresseder sorrow, and begged to be forgiven. Mr. ORTIFITIC.—f nett!r heard of such a brutal outrage of a servant in ray life : to neglect your duty, and then to assault your mistress with an infant in her arras, so as to endanger both their lives_it is an unpardonable offence. I shall require you to find good hail to answer the charge at the Sessions. She not being able to procure this, was committed to Clerkenwell. • POT-STF•LINO.—Anne I.Ort,T, a wretched-looking woman. was brought up by Morris. charged with stealing a quart not from off the rails, to Barlow-street, the property of Mr. John Wise, of the Black ►lorse, High-street. The prisoner, on tieing taken into custedr, gave up the pot , which she had concealed under her clothes, and offered an um brella to let her go. The prisoner said. she did not know it was street robbery, she did it from distress, having two fatherless children to provide for. She was fully committed. Yesterday. John Berwick , a thong man, was brought up in custody of Hooker, charged by Rdbert Edmonds, with throwing his wife out of the window, at two o'clock on Sunday morning. Mr. Edmonds, who Is well known as en excavator. living In Torrington-place, Edgeware-mad, stated, that the prisoner had married his sister shout fourteen months ago, soon after which he used her in a most shameful manner, by violently beating her, and she has marks on her throat as if strangulation had been attempted. That on Sunday morning last, Mr. Berwick came home at two o'clock, when witness's sister upbraided him with stopping out so late, on which he struck her some tremendous blows on the head, which so stunned her, that she was not aware of what followed till she arrived at Middlesex Hospital. Witness stated, that his sister WWI found on the pavement of the Street in Gray's-buildings, Man chester-square, by the watchman, in a state of insensibility. Wit ness begged that his sister might be protected tram such outrage, and hoped that some redress might be had, so as to hinder further violence of a similar nature. Mr. Berwick stated, that be came home at the time stated by Mr. Edmonds, when his wife upbraided him in very severe terms, and threw knives, forks, ke. at him. He certainly did strike ha, but denied throwing her out of the window. Mr. Raw td xso ); ordered the prisoner to find bail to answer the charge at the Sessions. Two informations for nuisances. in shooting night-soil on the wharfs of the Grand Junction Canal, at Paddington, were yester day heard at office. The cases excited much local interest, and the office was in con sequence crowded with respectable persons from that neighbourhood. It appears that the practice has existed for many years, and has of late, from the increasing extent and respectability of the neighbour hood, become a sub at of general complaint. To remedy the evil indictments were a fe'v years back preferred nt Hicks's Hall, which failed; and the parish, finding t'emselves disappointed in this mode of proceeding, took care to introduce a clause, specially apply ing to these nuisances, into the Local Act, for the government of the parish, which was passed during the last Session of Parliament, and became operative about six weeks ago. It was under this clause, which prohibits the shooting or keeping of soil on any wharf within 6110 yards of a dwelling-house, that the present information were laid. Mr. Awnaxws, the barrister, and Mr. Pitman, the vestry clerk, attended on behalf of the parish; and Mr. ADOLPIIVS attended on banded Mr. Kelly. one of the defendants. The first information called on was that against Mr. Edward Kelly, the dust contractor for several exteusive parishes at this end of the town. Several witnesses were called, who dearly proved that on the night of the Itith of October a quantity of soil was deposited on Mr. Kelly's wharf, and that the wharf was less than 600 yards distant from -. dwelling house. Mr. Anotrnrs. after taking . several preliminary objections, which were overruled by the Magis tr ates, proceeded to urge, In de fence, a clause at the end of the Local Act, which expressly provides that nothing in that Act shall be so construed or applied as to affect the rights or privileges granted to the Grand Junction Canal, and which clause, he contended, exempted his client. inasmuch as the lease under which he held the wharf was granted to him by the Grand Junction Canal Company, and with express permission to carry on the occupation now comp! tined of. Mr. RANT Li )(sox inquired if .31r. Adolphus could point out to him any privilege granted to the Company which would authorise the doing of the act in question. Mr. A9°41'111:6 confessed be could not. Mr. RAWI.IIII9OX and Mr. Hosannas, ACT consulting together. declared themselves satisfied with the evidence adduced, and eon. Meted the defendant in a mitigated penalty of 20s. Mr. John Treble, the proprietor of an adjoining wharf, was also convicted in a like sum. 21r. Air nu ewe said, the only desire o! the parish was to obtain a discontinuance of the nuisance ; but should the defendants per sist in the practice, he was instructed to say, that fresh informations would be laid. TURNPIKE Totts.—..fasses Ofleo, the driver of a cart belong ing to Mr. Johnson, of Limon-grove. was charged under the Ge neral Turnpike Act, with evading the New-road toll fur the York shire Sting° Gate. Ily the Act in question, the passing out of th e main road, so as to avoid the turnpike gat; and then again re-en tering it, is constituted en offence, subject to a heavy penalty, if done with intent to defraud." In this case, it nppeared the driver, who is a countryman. but little acquainted with London, was directed by his master to take the cart along the paved streets, running parallel with the New road, and so to enter the Tottenham-court-road ; instead of so do lug. however, it appeared that after proceeding as directed nearly the entire distance to the Tottenham-court-road, he turned off by mistake into the New-toad, along which he proceeded a dimmest of about 200 yards. Mr. Ilswtinsow was of opinion. that there was no intention to defraud, and that the entering of the New-mail was the result of rr.istake : he therefore dismissed the compl,lnt. :If .411 K Fn. CORN.EXCIIANCE, Nor. 21, We were but moderately supplied with any Cilia duri• week, but this moniiag there was a fair stipply In wt ley, btit not much ot other lirain. In tile early pant of the demand for tine ‘Vlicat was brisk, atd an advance ut toll gr. was obtained, but as the market proceeded the tittnigtl slackened, and the above advar.ce was tartly sup;as r ,,d . malting Barley soli readily, and was to 4t. Int qr. 4 4 , last 31onday a craresponenng advance tcek place in sorts. Our Market is very bare of Oats, as all er nearly h E 'imply expected . from the Baltic has ben shut out, axin g long continuance of adverse wit.t's ; our Buyers, who hare Lit t delayed their purchases, in hopes the above supply wsn'd r 11: are now obliged to come to Market, ar.d we lyre to notice advance of 2s. per qr. on the Currency of this day w.ek. and Pease both scarce and dearer. ‘Ve hare not to , soteacy :ion in our prices of Linseed or Rapeseed. Our Pon s clewed agaiist the importation of any 4 lerAiption of Foreign L .' till the average is made up un the lath February cut. wit EAT. REANsa sp lC uo. en nu t ( and wkhitit E ,N) as o e r a f : ik red) 40 50 : to to 1 ,6 4 : I - (red) Ditto (white) North Country Irish RYE Ticks liarrows Small 4Ga to 72% 48s to 75% ties to 74a 5s to 64. -36 s to 38a DAILEY. MA LT. ". Norfolk (pale) V A & I:latz (do.) fro Ditto (brown) . English naaxic Foreign Malting Grinding 11s to 52s 36s to lOs - sc, LINSEED. E^Oitth . 44 4 Foreign . *err sato. English (per 13s1) 241 SLEDS. Ilempseed (per gr.) Foreign (ditto) 42 . 31ustardseed (brown) per bushel - 111 Ditto (white) . 1 1 Clover (red) ewt. do s Ditto (white) pa - do r Tretail A - 2 Carrawayseed dis Coriander . 5, Tares (winter) Is Od to I/ I Ss to !lanky - I/ Ikons . Il 18s to (key Peas - 21 24 to E. Nov. N. Reins, pct load N 4 Peas - -24 s Rye . . _, Tares . . ..4 OATS. Feed, Essex 22s to 2Cs Lincolnshire 221 to 26s Yorkshire 23s to 26s Irish . 22s to 25s Poland, Lincolnshire 240 to 281 Yorkshire . 24s to 29s PoUito, Lit:cobs/lire 25s to 29s Yorkshire 2:4 to 80:4 Scotch . 26s to 32. Irish -24 s to 28s PEA.. . ---. Hog - 44 s to Os Maple Grcy -47 s to ICs White 441 to Os Boilers - bts to 68. GITILDFOIt Wheat per L 151 10s to 211 Os Old ditto - 01 Os to 01 Os Oats ner qr. 11 2s to 11 12% Old ditto - 01 Os to 01 Os IlkatTFOR Wheat, per load of five bushels . 38e to Cal New . —s to —s Barley, per gr• -36 s to Ms SMITIIFIELD, iforrnav, Nov. 22. We have a large number of busts have this day, but tke,, of moat of them continues to be very indifferent. Thereat, ever, some good short-horns amongst the supply; and fa t: and the best Scots and Runts, the current price is Is. sinall decline on last week. The ordinary sorts ale very do sale, and, we feu, will not easily meet with purehasaa X: keeps steady, both as to supply and price, but, perhaps, with a more briskness in the trade. We are well supplied with 1: The very best of the smaller sizes may be quoted at ss. v. good useful ones can be bought foe is. The same observatia apply to Pigs, trs. 441. being only given fur the very choicer. Beet - 3s Od to 4s 2,1 Veal • is Id to ' 31utton - 3s 4d to 4s 44 I Pork - 3s 44 to HEAD OF CATTLE THIS DAT: Ikaltat 3,478 I Sheep. 17,600 I Calves, 260 230. RAY-MARKET. 41 lOs Id to SI is Id 31 lOs ed to 41 Oa Od 61 10s Od to 61 is Od 41 lOs Od to 51 Os Od 11 16a Od to 21 5s II Hay (Old) New Inferior Clover (Old) Ditto (Inferior) Straw . rEW N. 'GATE AND LEADENHALL—GIy the Carcass Beef Sts Id to 3s 44 I Veal -31 ed to Mutton - 21 to 3s lid Pork - 3s Id to PRICE OF BREAD. The highest Price of Bread in the Metropolis is 113. four-pound boat. There are others who sell from a hali t eLt , three halfpence below that rate. PRICE OF POTATOES. Nor. 22. Potatoes 31 lis Od to 5/ 04 Od per Too. Yorkshire Kidneys 31 Os Od ditto. PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW. ST. /AXES'S. WIIITECRAPEL. Ilay • 60s 0.1 to 110 s Od Hay . lei od to 11 Ditto (New) —a Od to Od Inferior . tO Clover- 70S Od to 110 s Od Clover - Il6s Od to 1: Straw . 33s Od to 43s Od suaw . 38s Od to PRILE OF HOPS, per Cwt. N0v.33. POCKETS. NAM& Kent - 61 lOs to Si S. Kent . 61 OS to Suucz 61 Oo to 71 OS Sussex -3/ 13s to Essex - 61 6s to 81 Os E,sex . 61 Os to Farnham, fine 121 Os to 111 Os—Seeonds 1010, to 121 PRICE OF RAW I Price by Tallow (as stated b] FAT. per stone of 8/b. y the Tallow 3leltcre), 2i PRICE OF TALLOW Town Tallow -43 a Od Yellow Russia -37 a Od White ditto -33 a Od Soap ditto . 35, Od Melting Stuff -30 a ad Ditto Rough - Ns Ed V. SOAP, &c. per 1121 b. Yellow Soap - Mottled - Curd Wares Good Dregs - PRICE OF CANDLES. The price of good'S;;;Fan - dies - inii;;eia - dshops is as Wow Candles, per dawn 6s to is Aloulds . . Ps HAW ij HIDES. Best If eifers and Steers, ---- - 2s IM to Ts 81 per stone • 3s 2d to 3s 44 Market Lalf (each) - Be 11 Middlings - 2s 104 to 3s Od SHEEP SKINS. Polled, 3s 9d to es 9d I Sheep, Os Od f Downs, 2s N to 3s it Fells, Os Od to Ys Od I Lambs, Os Od to 00 Od PRICE OF LEATHER, per lb. Butts, 50 to Stabs - - - 204 to lid Ditto. 56 to etilbs - -23 d so - 41 Dressing Hides - - - - 174 to 2rd Fine ('oach Hides -20 d to 124 Light Crop Hides, fot Cutting, 3$ to 401 b; . 1g al to LA Ditto, 45 to 501bs . . - - led to 214 Calf Skins, 38 to 401bs - 164 to 251 Dino, 50 to 701bs - - . - 244 to 27 4 Ditto, 70 to 80Ibs - - - - 221 to 251 Small Seals (Greenland) - . . 174 to 154 Large Ditto . . - led to ltd Tanned lions Hides - - -13 d to 114 Spanish Hone Hides - - - 14.1 to 214 COAL MARKET. N0v.22. SAO: at Market. t& Neweatle II Sunderland Welsh Coal 1 Cultn Ships Soli. ni . _ Pries. -33 s Od to 391 3. 1 - 33. &I to Os 3-I as 04 to —4 04 31. Od to --s 04 BIRTHS. On Monday. Notes:llm 211, at Sheen Lodge, the Hon. Nis Penrhyn, of a daughter. On the Wilt instant. at Penningtoa Horse, neat Lymtn . gum , ILI lady of the Rev. Charles Heath, of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 20th instant, at St. Mary-la-borne Church, Bobo' 11'Wi!limn, of Fumival's Inn, Architect, to Charlotte, 44 16 and to-heiress of the late William Borstal!, Esq. of Norfolt.scret , London, and of Wash, Yorkshire. On Monday last, at tit. Martin's Church, Guernsey. 1.1 1 J , ' Henry Baynes, Royal Artillery, to Henrietta, youngest (40' 1 . of the late Charles Le Alarchant, Esq. of Beaumont Lodgethu s Island. November 20, at Portsmouth, Charles Edward O'Neal, Eal Captain in the 44th regiment, to Georgians flood, daughter of T 31ottley, Esq. of the Customs. At Inverness, on the 13th current, Donald M'Quisen. DV . Corrybrough„ Captain in the Madras Cavalry, to Margang, daughter of James Grant, Esq. of Bught. DIED. On the 21st inst. at Barnes, Surrey, at a very advanced age, 3 lt‘ Arabella Sprigg. On Friday, - the 19:h instant, at Bin field, Berks. altar a gh tg illness, Pettus Harman, Esq. in the C6th year of his sr. On the 21st instant. Mrs. S. M. Gregory, wife of Lieu:ens-A .t T. Gregory, R.N. of West Farleigh, aged 58. Near Leghorn, on the 16th of October, after a short Wow. Sarah Chandler, the wife of William Alves, Esq. of Enliam Plan. At his house, in Pulteney-street, Bath, Sir William Watar., Knight. Tuesday, at hie house, Bristol. the Rev. Henry Betas, 'ton Tuesday, of Congreahury, and Rector of Whitton, Radnorshire . On the Ilth instant, at the Parsonage-house , Sash?. tho RcV. John Sharpe, Rector of that pariah, in the 79th versed his sr. On the 21st instant, at ('harlwood Park. near Crawley. ono short illness, J. C. Woodbridge, the eldest son of J. Woodbridge, Esq. On the 17th irstr.nt, Elizabeth Isabella, wife of the R Egerton Arden Bigot, of Pipe Hayes, in Warwickshire , daughter of a nd Rev. Bridgeman. filliti — WATEit THIS DAY AT1.7./NiKkiltillte g • Morning 33 min. after 3. I Afternoodin. Art sr — Printed at TIIE BRITISH PRESS Office. byi.W. Cativo' Isl, Stiand, end pub:isbed by R. Lutgox, U p 4 'tire It , mark t di rd. } ' tOT to . 1 , 1 4 to Lo. SI 4 ' 4 ' 4 - • e L it.. • "I , Y, t ;Igt, L k, t iti CI , 6r. it• • Cf. to 34 1 tr. , 1 1, 411 es 242 41, th I s MI D % t o 11, 4450 th 4 ' . t. .4:41, toy to t o :t1 to it 1 toga 1. I; fr t to 21 ;* to j "16 to 2. toy 440 to ra —4ty /e V/4 !//t, LO4 fa tat •k ni adt • Lon tub aka Oh OA% • a rata to told! to k d U itt U atvet. to 4, RL to 1-1 1. for tt Ifpeopy t: . L . o o --a* liie I to VI I to illy to 61 lb to 71 5 121 et • 4s 411 lb. 70, 79, *.s let OS Gs ~~~~ i; `~~ I ~ ~ , . r r, If I 1t ~ i 1' ~~ /I