The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-12-09 00:00:00

1 i ..cation by the Rata Academe. Rut the rowan of this meth,: is, del , love it notes. descriptive end critical, seemly intellig . .hic decd tram bad grammar but the writers of which are hireling% who es mc :remelt from the artists, impose 'iron the visitor!, aid are ott :is if Turxtie of the Inlet:et they hove the presum;n:en to leandle... Ile I.llr. Curtsey) would not now .nice into adi mission whether Ci e. 11 estniaeott was or was not ignorant of the sob:ere of .huh t hes .:bet ac.leseir him of having ilic Km:option hot pr. t , rosisoi‘ to the task he had untleytala te may foes, do. ,objett of legitimate inquiry ; but is nets the fir•ftni:znt iudoOrs to his client that lie hid got up the present puloication for the putposo of extorting like a bit hu.g money fri tie t he artists, he :do Mai in the fouirst and basest manner. I.• (:ar. G.) was elti.tains lice to state- tbs . . the •etrwn situ tire eke! the attention of air. Wesmeriett to the • ta:le.l on the pteptietor or the for n:nir Medd. rvtl'i , rir.g bins to ! 17% up the rune of thin author of Oil. varat.ripli. 11" it it dot re.re:e..ti..n the proprietor refum..l to r "only, ahhii:i.ei hr cx !.i. t ram ill at any injury that nosh) it.tre bran Seine ••t the plaint•:l hy Itt publication. lie (11r. Ctn.:my) w'a'd stet-. as a !tetra) fin Alton, that whin any prmerioti rof a r...x-;.bete is fin. jewel upon :4 en anonymous tr....esgtli of reputation. that is the etateniut resupplied to the editor timer out to be a li b el, and that the proprietor afterwards feast s to 4ive up tin: author's crne, tin der such corronstancen it is fair to eri.outele that the proloiet , r has a-trivia an indemnity for the corierthmt.t. Thr rot tietor who lends nu )since to the eiiculatiou cf tkfalliatory ItiMtet, wsa unques.tunably bornd to t.ive tip the attliter of it, roil the crook ;oil ion cal the indemnity he recei...cil is the only hilt' T. Burnt he ints not to do so, lle Cdr. (:erro") emit' rot an ticipate the nature of the defence to shit h ins learned Friend would rcsott. Auticks such as he had dose ribed were not itittly to appear ton rapt. in which the prment Idol appeared. Their paper wee of a t..t...wett too regpe.t;ahle t14. - seta. to ?Orli attacks. It w:oi a rep .; of extetsive circulation its d a ily . publirytion was, he belie? , I. ‘i . rent h, 1, 90 mint% But this consioeration shrub! weigh with thr .t cry its argentdam : the noire respectable t' ce.t.f..;ttlaitta West, e... , 1 the more este t err the circulation of the piper, the &Mit/ .wild he the t'.' 1.1... f If it ita 7e a taper without Charade; ItOterina 0r.'.1 , her dealteg indiscriminate:7 .7; lib":. Iris client Illitttit have mitt) it uuneces.ary to vim:trete himself f its •ttacks. A sanction and withoujejty tone given to the calumny trout the spicrut from which it cater, that it would not otherwise peress. The object of felt. %licstmacott, lit brimticg this eletion. was the vindication of his character, which hail Leen most tint Orly mirailel. lie ltd not impute personal morn: agati.l: hint to the deft in this action. They even privately expressed their concern it i!6 publication: but tit .y de,aiocsl to give up the author. Toe r.•mensiblity of the pork:mph thereore devolved tons thy% and they lied Wade theinsitees, by their eau scleaion, 1::0 pante% li.sb/e Io be called upon for ruparatimi. follhawit:g witaessot were then met:Med. joi c pti 1141 a primer. I primcd this catalogue. [The taitmile was 1. vc given into the lestuis of den witness. tut the por tme of rerlitying to the idcatuy of the pideliration.l : Ir.C. Bit:st y:omits is the 'meteor oh this catalogue which I printed. truss-elluitincri.-1 have not the Gist edition of the catalogue. '.'nes is the two id edition of it. (The edition o f the cats legue wits tree shown to the sinks*, which he icier:Ohl] It was risitoel on the 4th of .)lay. The second edition was not publirhed s It•gettal day. afterwartle. The author is not Mr. sVrietinacott toe arid. Ido not know of the catalerguz having been circulated at the catrtnce to Sotnerget House. It. Shirwoitel cumin...l—l am a publisher and hools.:11er is ihsternester.row. I received it froin the printer to publidi for Mr. Miesuorteott. We supplied Mr. Onwhyo. of Catherine-street, "pith copies. I know of the article sit theMor s :;;,,, 11 , 744 Ido not know whet we. the rile Wore the publication of dos article. I swoon speak as to the ace' of the paragraph in the Morning lie no the publie mind. (;toss-examined-1 did not know of any person, baying bought estilieute as the catalogue of the Academy, Whig übligrl to tler•tv .; away and pierciisse a fresh one. Mr. tfiewhvii exonlined.—il am it bookseller residing! in Castile. ; I was one of thepubloliers of the catalogue. It wag • dished in the lerittoill•! of May. Its sale was principally about lie, nerset House anelthe :":rail; its ha l.; was extensive. .(bout a -rt.:eight atter the puhlicatieue, I remember the paragraph lhat an pc;-.11 in the Monroe Herod respecting it. IJo not think the s s's so extensive after the publication of the paragraph iu the o 'd rmit Iris before. _ _ l'enri.etramined--1 saw Mr. Westmaeott on the subject of ;ha tsdaingue. and rave copies of it to people id the stmt pel at his ; I do not know wham he employs' to make too cot reetiens in thosecond ellinco of the catalogue ; never went to the Exhibition ; and the only differ... Tee 1 remarked between the rd:tmax of it was, that the stems, was of n smaller site. (The find edition was !inn liatided to the witness, soil the mistake tit the invert ion of the portrait of Earl FitzwiStain for Earl Clan willum_pointed cut to runt.] Mr. Ovt•o vs - suggested, that whatever was to be read ought to b 3 reed *by the officer of the Court. Cross-examination mtmed.-1 do not know of any alters. Dens in the *.rood from the first edition; the second edition was nut published until efter the latter end of May. Mr. (!rant; said both crhions were put in. Mr. S • TT contended that the publication of the first edit tun was only proved by the Were:tee% The Lotto tEn JUST ICI said, that certainly proof was only give it the sale of the tit , tt edition. Mr. et: nxLY proposed to mail Mr. Sherwood. Mr. Sherwood nesEed.—The Catalogue. were sold the day after they came in ; I cannot spy that any rowdier of the second edition was sold before the 13th of blay. It was an object to sell them hear the Aavdcmy; I cennot say whether I sent them within two to three days to 3lr. Onwhyo for sale; Mr. Onwhyn had them whenever he wished for titan ; there is a difference in the external appearance of the first and scared editions, owing to a mistake ram in the direethms for publication. , Charles Trevor examinal.-1 biking to the stamp-race— b'e witness was about to prove that the defer.lants were the proprietors and publisher. It was *omitted by the counsel fur tte deferwlmits, that they were do: proprietors end publisher. I J. Malheur: also lolling. to the Stamp-indite ; lie produced the .Warming Prr.,ld of May 13th, which contained the alleged libel. The plaintiff's case here closed, as to the elandoution of oral evidence. The paragraph winch contained the libel, as quoted Ire Mr. Gurney s statement. was then read by the °dicer of ills Court. A Pindaric Ode, front whicit we make an extract, and ohm documentary evidence, were also read : TIIE •CADEIIICI•ES. True as remorse to er'ry sinner, Or true :.1 Academic dinner. Which the grand shim precedes • Your Laureate Bard, ye great K. A..'s, Agate. renews his annual lays, ..tnel tunes his critic reeds. I know rot how it happens, but I Gel 7 his time disposed to be genteel : Not that you sett a ticket for the dinner, DM that ! awn my hose last year Was in her playful mood severe, And ',mince your Council moil, a heinous sinner. I hear you're mending-of your pride, Anil are mare liberal beside To a young beginner ; It firs you well-hut sages say, !let Oprei:ino any sway. Or are the Kissokers thinner? Has the New Plait in Pell Mall East Dimerbed the prospect of your foam ? Or are you pally t eulnennog a new system just and pure, •urbere's ample wove Mit, to be sure,) To treat all fairly. serrcurs IN THE LIFE ecaosite• With meetly grace and easy air We'll take Sir Thomas in the chair; For who like Lawrence can express The varied charms of loveliness? An ancient dame 'wil'd II istory, With di:app.:eh-a. et in her eye, Advancing, own'', hit skill to trace The semblance of each human face. • • • • • Plaaman, the ann of classic ease, Descendant of Prasitrlca, Wiese flniched mend and chaste dolga Is over perfect to a line; Or yet a:lather might be riled For Inspiration justly fetu'd : lloward, whex aerial taia:.ic touch, Nor 'itabett too little, or :ootnuels; But nch in bright poetic thought, Das all the NI uses fancy caught. 'fails spoke et.• dame. then took Int Seat, Vie!' IL A. with a emir to greet. Wilkie, wilt herria's caution came, And met a lecture front the dime: - - " Be all thyr.--if-m• cory ea.:U -r/riga/nil ie styli- oraf tiroo;..'a ; Pim turn aside, limn arlihes and fan, To follow Rembrandt or 'I ,nias. Good Messrs. Daniels. when you past. Keep your Ma: outline somewhat faint; t )r if you'll take a gentle hint, You'd better wrap.: in atiwatii.l. :milliard, enwreath thy brow with bays, linnour and fame have bleared thy days. Mittreany ninst (writ.. dp t:raars, From ell who know ham. just applause, 'll' tuner is Nature's chid-4,0t Art.- Ma tiorlei pencil can impart To canvas the 'unmeant glow Wlise.h decks the grove or dell below. Northcote, the veteran, let toe praise For works or past and bright'- days. And We,uall, too thought sweeties:marks lin% ye e of geninslariPient sc,..arks. iehe followers of Sit Joshua see !Sold, mound. easy. grand and free -Phillips and Jacks la-both may chains giquality with any ratite. 4' lent, thy bright transparent touch eunever praised be too much. ribee b r ighten• with intvcaeing years, And stands shunt from all compeers; -A roiligy to r.ature sere, i mit and • Painter too. kat bitimi ont di ab e d ti t o 'a b mns le reed.* "tam e n to fa le rt. 7.1 IMI I I .1114•► a figure Of • head I tree gain thee more than bread." Mr. (iv ex er repeatedly insisted on the edmiseion of the two editions; it W.l very excusable wed natural that misprints should c r e ep inn the first edition. Mr. SCAOLLTT *rid iris beamed Friend was very anxious span the eubleet of n.isprints and mietakes. It was with ben as with the poet— " Hand ego yemeis offender tnaulis I:bi plura Intent." At the sac 'inn of the Counsel for the defendants, several ex , tracts irons the first edeion of Mr. ei'estreazottes Catalans*. wore rued. lead Samell and Sir %Vellum Curtis were described in very . flattermg ternis to the manter fen T.Lawrencee but the pictures were elan deseribed as ugly as the originals. (More laughter.) We subjoin one or two prisegee, which the learned Counsel ( Mr. Se:whet) required to be read, as a specimen of the style of Mr. WeAtftlACO!l'a purferriatire : " 3en. enmet at sea after a storm. (F. l)aaby.) Excites the astonishment tat any Oct who leeks at it, and engrosses their at tentem." leiet. A Nymph : a seem In marble. (It. ‘Festmartet, R.A.) A einetsbirly clemte and treittiful specimen, classical and elegant, with ell the toffee-se and soietnere of virgin innocence. The ex pie 'sem is heavenly and bieethee serenity of mind--the hair is tastefully dimes/el : the outline is exquisite, when viewed sideways in a lint from Cli intrey's statue tif Pr. Jackson. The lightness and playfulness of the drapery *truck us as being in the moat fell entitle style of are" " h., l'ortreit of the !light Hen. Lord Chief Justice Abbott. (.1. Wood.) This is s facture of very considerable merit, atilt as we suspect the artist is young, he I rumises to excel in his pro fession." Several other passages were read, which were afterwards referred to in the statement of the Learned I 'mined foe the defendents. Mr. SCAR LICTT nildreseed the Jury on behalf of the defendants. Ilia friend Mr. Abbott haul read to teem the documents connected with this ease. On three documents principally their decision woulil be formed. Mr. Ceirney had stated to them that paintings were a leeitenate subject of criticism. He agreed with his Learned Ft ;end that they were ; but he would go farther, and any, that nut only paintings, but public-atones of every description, were in no less a degree subjects of criticism and camtnent. The writer of any `sore had no in. re rich than the artist who had painted a picture, to easy that he should be spared. or to determine and specify time t reemure of retire which should be dealt oat towards hint. Of the writer of tee publication which formed the subject of critieisin in the fiforrior Iltrold. he (Mr.S.) knew nothing, except that be thought proper to publielt a cetalogue to the exhibition of the 'loyal 21 rulenly, WIII7II he was pleased to call "critical and descriptive." To his qttalitications for criticism and description, he (Mr. S.) weeel shortly have occasion to call their attention. To this peelication was attested tee ' , ante of C. Westin:mote There was also a catalogue of the !loyal Academy ; but for the puepouse of forestalling the sale of the Coral Academy's catalogue, porters and other pursuits were stationed shout t he d e mn of the ma ion, shove 'hey it was to &spire of this tentlopie of Mr. WeStelaCOtt, to visitor who were not aware of the distinction between the car. rem and incorrect catnlogno. Tee lint charge, therefore, which he (Mr. S.) had to bring against Mr. IVemelecott, was that of having committed a (mud upoto the Royal Academy, by endeavour ing to destroy tile sale of their catelogue by the one which he thus stureeptieously substituted for ft. Ills hind ( Mr. Homey) ad. meted, that if he published the exert ropy of the Royal Academy's catalogue he windui be liable to an action mr a piracy of their copy right; tint the catalogue was at. drawn up, as, by certain altera tions and omissions, to avoid a betidey to action. The manifest object of the publication in the Nei Niue /fends, was to prevent the mischief, and to counteract the prejudice which this imperfect catalogue might produce ten the minute of the visitors to the Royal Academy. With regard to the person who undertook this tebli. cation, he would ask what right or what qsalifiestion he had fur such an office ? do not attack hint (said Mr. S.) from motives of malice, but we attack' him lot bed grammar ; we attack him for in capacity ; and we furilier allege that it is the compilation of hireling writers: and he (Mr. S.) ens satisfied, when the J ury duly weighed it, they woeful agree with him, that the article complained of in the Aforofog llo.ald was just, meritorious, and laudable. Who is the person, he would ask, who haul undertaken the task of fomiiag the public taste, end rf handing down to posterity the fame mid the praises of the artists of this country ? et'hat proof did he afford of his competency fur such a task ? Wee it that he praised persons of admitted merit in the art which he undertook to write upon ? %Val his praise of e'er Thomas Lawrence a test of his competency and merit ? Ily nu means ; the thispraise of each a man, and of persons of mknewleiged end eetablished reputation—a sneer upon them would be of no avail, for it would be in opposition to the uni versal verdict of mankind. lint although artists of the clam he had mentioned would not be affected by criticisms of this kind, yet dime who had nut arrived at that eminence in their profession might consider then/selves injured by such publications. The cri ticism in the toferniNg Herald was a useful correction both to the publisher of this work ' and a useful warning to the public against being deceived by its misrepresentations. 'l'he writer dioneht proper, in the commencement, to indulge in what he called a Pintlarte ode. Ile had probably heard or read that there were some persons who, in former times eminent for their genius. were unwilling to convey their idea. in regular poetry, and thought pro per to disdain the aid of numbers, in order to &Weed greater facility for throwing off the effusiens of their genius. With this Pindaric ode he would not lung ectupv their attention, further than to say, that the chief part of it was absolute nonsenee, as they must have perceived from the reading of it by the officer of the Cmtrt. Ile would neat call their attention to the first note of this publication, from which they would perceive that he who was in ready to accuse others as beefier% was not himself altogether free from a disposition to hind fault . Ile dial not mean a disposition to libel maliciously, foe the note was ctiolally exempt as the present para praph hem such a diameter. The note was to the following uffect " This annual dinner of the Academicians is a useless and eyrie:Tani experiliture of filar hundred pounds. that might be much more ben.titially employed in the advancement of the Arts, by the encouragement of rising Online." By the encouragement of rising genius it is to be presumed he meant that he should himself be put to school, to ham grammar. This would be a proper appropriation of 11.101. Ile Wl.lllll now read to them the seimild rate, 110111 which they would perceive how much he atom! in need of instruction in the initiatory rules and principles of grammatical construction. He (Mr. $.) had understood that a verb wis an north taut mend,' of a sentence, but here would be found a tionittatiee case with no verb to follow : . . "The Society of ' llritlsh Artists,' recently established, who have erected moat commodious galleries hi Pall-Mall East, for the exhibition and salt of their works. This institution, which gonna, fair to become a formidable rival to the Royal Academy, have, in their arrangement, set the parent body an example worthy of imitation." _ _ _ ..... Now it was manifest that the word " who," in this sentence wu an expletive, and had refenr.ce to no antecedent : and " the Society of Bntish Artists," which was the nomieative case, was kit with out a verb, by which it was to be governed. Nur was this the only fault in the sentence; ibe part of the sentence which followed it evinced a still mitre glaring ignorance of grammar. 'fliey all knew that a noun of number might precede a verb in the singular or plural; but it was never eupponal that a verb could be in the sin. gular and the plural in the satire sentence with the same nominative case; lint it was hiund in the singular—`• This Institution which promises," and immediately afterwards came the earl) in the plural • have." It only served to slew he did not know " who" or " what" he was about. (A laugh). The next note to which he would have to call the attention art the Jury was one in which the very meaning of the language was perverted. It was to the following effect :—" if at this penis! the leueorary titles of the Academy were fixed in proportion to tire number of professors in Sculpture and Painting, which was no doubt taken into conaideration, then it is but lair to expect that these distinctions and excitements to the rising and improving talent of the country should be extended to meet the high clueracter and increasing consequence of the British artists of the present slay. Without this liberal and just extension of reward, the arts will retrograde, and its professors lase all relish for a science where the honorary distinctions bear no comparison to the Fruit's, talent, and numbers engaged." Now here he would call the attention of theJuvy to the word " fixed ;" it was manifest tile writer meant the very reverse—that he meant '• veiled ;" fur the titles, it was plainly suggested, should • tare in progortion"—they could not remain " fixed," if distri hired •• in proportion to the rising and improving intent of the country." Ile was anxious to call their particular attention to the notice of lestly E. Itelgreve. This picture was described to be— " fleshy in tone ante firm in Kiwi!, with strong characteristic power. There lire six other pictures of merit his the present Exhi- Infirm by this artist." Now what was to he understood by this ? Could any reasonable man compn hem! it ? One might easily une:erstand what a fleshy toe or a fleshy foot meant; but who could explain what was meant by " fleetly tone." Ile might as well have said, " fleshy in . pencil, and firm in pencil," and if he Ilia so, all that could be raid of it was, that it was equally unintelligible. This was written for the niece purpose or alliteration. The next specimen of had grammar he should notice was the exprcsaion singular line," for aingu. lady fine. No person of taste or education would hare written such a sentence; but he would row acquaint them with a disco. very of the plaintiff: They ell knew there were three degrees of comparison —till positive, the ciiinnaratire, and the superlative. But the plaintiff added another —•• the 13101. i superlative "—a dtrree above the superlative. It ocentred in the following passage. The Pucheas of f ainicester was the subject of the picture. Ibtaryosi.—There is in the composition of this artist more true genius thin generally tails to the Ire of ratan ; toe fine conceit. lion he adds the guest requisites of a fnrrible pencil -nil an uncom. mon ere for colour ; the richness of style and happy distribution of lighi and shadow in the work before us, joined to it classic ex. cellence and fascinating subject, meat ensure it a place in sortie diatingueslied enllectiaa. It is a monody effort in the very Ligliest and insist superlative style ef r' t." Again a mistake was made, in the insertion of the picture of law! Chins iriam : it was inserted Lind Pitswilliain, and mention "rot made of •• this venerable nobleman," whereas there was no such picture at all as that of lanai litzwlllixm, who was very old, sea whose portrait was Wirer, he believed, taken by Sir 'l'. laiw. recce; but the portrait was that of Lord CLenwillinn. who 1141. ioung man. Of • painting cf Check,. there was the following topeCI.Mll of correct Crii;lish and testtful obstrvation f—" We shall exhibit a charitable feeling on our parts, to pass this in silence." The passage to whic'r be should next C.:11 their attention exhibited • remarkable *smple of the anti-climax. It was said of the paint ing No. 3ao, " It tills us with estonishment, and CIIFMISSib% our attention." One would naturally think, that when one's astonish. went was filled, his attention was of necessity engrossed : but the writer thought otherwise. This was not bad grammar, but it certainly was oansene. The preen., words were, " Filled one with admiration, and engrossed their stunsisw" The loaned Uncle- THE BRITISH PRESS. msn proceeded :a mo n ocrat nn th, improper substitution " any one" for every nne," and the subsequent mention of one in the plural by the word " their." The description went on to say, that the picture created this efrxr, although Jerwph Flume was looking on at full length to hear. This bad - allusion to a portrait of Mr. Hume, which was placed close to this picture which could not hear, and which could have had no effect whatever In " filling one with astonishment and engrossing their attention." This anti. climax reminded him of the host hue of a poem, written Li a Bard, whom he nevi not mention, for he was now no more, inwl he might therefore saltily quota him— . . . "Anil filed the world with rapture and delight." The passage to which he should now invite their attention was, that which contained observations osi 31r. Etty. In speaking of his performance, the writer thus expressed himself—" Mr. Etty has a st I le of Lie own ; it is nothing earthly ; and yet his drawing is beau. Situ! sea hie imagination eniquisite. sincerely wish we could in. duel him to bea little mare terrestrial in his ideas, and we doubt not of his bee oini nr one of the greatest rwrianichtn of the English school. The present wnrk has all the beauties of which we have been epesk. Mg, and is quite as full oewhat we consider the errors of his style." Mr. Etty it was said had amyl* of hie own • so much the better if he had. Ili. style was, moreover, said to be heavenly—im much the better pail: • but it was nevertheless mentioned as a reproach to him, sett as it deter of this heavenly style, thee " yet his drawing was beautiful, and his imattination exquisite." And thie was the sturwhich it was &Hegel would regulate puhlie taste, and improve and instruct the world in the fine arts. Ile hail, he submitted to the Jury, given surecient proof of the incapacity of the task lee Nut presume to undertake, and of his utter ignorance and rl:w. eatalifiration to treat of it. As well might an action be brought against any esnon who would say that the medicines of Dr. Solomon or lee. linxitite, one of whoa. was still living, were rather destructive than beneficed to the amstitution. The warning, he would repeat, was useful to the public, anti an action might equally be brought against a person who said that he did not appmre of Dr. Solomon's Balm of Gilead. as against any one who salt! that he did not re gem or admire die criticisms of Mr. IVestmacott. Men of estab- Imbed reputation were snie against the shafie of puny calumny ; but those who were not so secure, were naturally appreeensive of an *Rink in such a publication. It was in ties sense, and not with a view of imputing that species of estartityi to the plaintiff, which would amount to a felony, that the compilers ei ere spoken ores hire ling writers. The nature and description of itch a publication as that of which they were speaking, naturally lead to the exaction of money front Rene whose fears might he worked npon by a person who had not dust morel corn (lion which education gives, to restrain from the pub. lieation of whatever his pnetulices er his imerces might suggest. It had been stated by his friend (Mr. leumce), that a communice lion was niece to Mr. Theaters% that the ylat eite would forego the prevent action, on the name of the author of the paragraph coat. plained of being given up. Now there was no peel' of such a communication in evidence, and he only tequired that the Jury would leave such a communication riling-thee out of their con. retention. There was no imputation of malice on the defendants, and as far as he (Mr. Scarlet') could jude, the criticism was a fair (me, and the consequences were all fairly drawn and justi fied by the nature of the publication. The case was one which came within the legitimate line of obsersaeon which the several casts on this subject juetitied. He rememliered some time ago an action was brought against a popular Reviler for the publication of a criticieni on " Sir J. Carr's Tours." Two Noblenien, on that occasion, had the candour to 'mite that they were deceived by the work until they had read the Review, and that the rrusal of it gave them jateter and mote correct notions es to its merits titan they enter:Med before. The ease was tried before Lent lillenhorough, who he well remembered to have said on that occeeon, that such puldieltions were perfectly justifiable; flirt they were often of great importance end utility in regulating and directing public taste, and that " they preveeted the press from terming more than it al ready did, with the rapid publications that oppress as every day." In his opinion the present publication lame under this class of mt. ticism : it was candid and correct : it evinced no sentiment of per. 'anal hostility : it contained no individual attack ; but as the name of an eminent artist had been attached to it, and as the public might be induced to suppose it to be his production, the caution that swell an ignorant publication did not conic from the pen of a man of taint and reputation, yes beneficial and salutary. He (Mr. Scarlett) had stated to them his sincere conviction upon the case, and he wax satisfied that the deliherate consideration of its circumstances would lead the Jury to • similar result. The Loup Curet' JCSTIICE briefly Rimmed up the evidence. When a person gave anything to the world, whether it was a paint ing, a boek, or any tleecript inn of publication, it became the sub. ject of legitimate criticism ' and a fit topic for public discussion. No action would lie fee su ch criticism, severe nit might be, pro vided it die not eppn'tr to result from motives of malicious hostility or personal acrimony. But it was nut allowable for a person, un der pretence of giving a candid criticism, to impugn the mural cha racter of another. As to the book, or publication, in quzi e t, in his opinion it contained many punter' &entire of rep There were inwtainly Livances in it of bad grammar and bad mate, as far as he (The Lord thief Justice) who was not very conversant in such matures, could fudge. But there was an allegation lane portant for the consideration of the Jury ; it was the Imputation on the p!aintiff of seeking to extort money from the artists of the Royal Acstleany : of this no proof had been attempted; and this gave a ilifierent complexion to the case from what it would othersise bear. La other respects the paragraph was writ ten w leen the legitimate bounds of fair critical discusaton ; but here there was an imputation cast on moral character, which, as it could not he sustained, it *holed never hare been made. As far as his observation wcut, ho thought. an far from tile observations being hostilt to the artists, they were quite the reverse. lie wait there fore disposed to think that their verdict should be for the plaintiff, subject to such neelerate damages as the circumstances of the ease required. Mr. SCARLETT, in reply to the observation of his Lordehip that the articles were generally favourable in the artists, remarked, that tie untie publication of the preceding year was very severe. The Loan Cuter Jos' it e said, he had spoken from what he had observed. The publication of the preceding year was not in evOence before the ('curt and Jury. The Jury cotaulted together fur a few minutes, and returned a verdict fur the Plaintiff—Damages, Is. PREROGATIVE COURT, WxasEnna', Dzc. & llVore Sir Jon x SicaoL, Ma. TFI.FCIRT V. THOMAS. _ ...„--. This was aeon in which& creditor had called on the widow of the deceased to exhibit an invenuwy of the effects of the deceased. The widow had put in a declaration instead of an inventory, which was objected to ma not specifying the whole of the property. Dr. Lusittrittruit, on bslialf of the widow, relied on the drci%ion of a case in the Court of King's Bench, that this Court had not the poser to declare an inventory falsified at the suit of a creditor. ----- Hr. JENNE', on the part of Mr. Telford, the creditor, contended that the Court had the joriuliction. Sir Jolts Nteuot. delivered the judgment at considerable length. The case came before him in the form merely of a notion, but it involved a question of very crest importance ' • it arose in this manner : Amy 'norms was the widow and sole executrix of ' John Thomas, deceased, late a victualler in the neighbourhood of Clare-market, and she was cited by,Mr. Telford, • creditor, to ex hibit an inventory of her late hut:liana's property. She exhibited • declaration instead of an inventory, and prayed to be dismissed from the suit. The creili•or objected, and prayed to be heard on his petition. Ile objected that she had rot set forth the par. neuters of evrtain ',flats of the deceased, nor by whole they were appraised ; that she still carried on the busineo of' a vie. , tualler in the 141111 C house, at a great profit ; and that the lease of that house was of much center value than she had stated it to be : and that therefore the Inventory was not a full and perfect one. t rn behalf:of the widow, it was argued, that the Court had no jarkeliction to object to an inventory at the suit of a creditor, sad that it was so decided in CAMS at common law, par. ticularly in the recent case of " Henderson v. French," reported in Mettle and Selwyn, which also referred to former rasa; they seemed to have been decided without any great discus:ion; and the case of " Henderson v. French," so much relied on, was decided probably on the authority of the former cases. It was much to be regretted that • question of jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical Courts, more especially lung exercised, should have been decided without the arguments of Civilians, who, by long experience in the ecclesiastical law,_ were much better informed in that respect than the Advocate. of other Courts. It was a matter of great eon. venience that creditors and legate:et:should be sble to ascertain what the deceased died in possession of, before going to the expense of prosecuting a long suit in these (. 4 _ourts. A dkelosure of assets, the executor was bound to make, by the oath which he takes at the time of entering on his office. lf an executor or an administrator coted get rid of a disclosure of the assets, by the production of any paper he chose to exhibit, that mete fact should the propriety of the Courts enforcing a more correct statement, otherwise the purposes of this practice would he in a great measure defeated, for it fre quently happened, that the very persons called upon were those who were the h..s disposed to make a full disclosure. The ease of " Henderson v. Fren: h," v hich was decided in the Court of King's Ilcuch, appeared to hare Imen argued on the footing of the statute of Henry the Eighth, as if the giving an inventory rested solely od the authority of that statute; the arguments went principally on that amend, as far as could be collected, for they bore referenc., to cases. all of which appeared to have been argued on similar grounds. The cases cool Supposed the jttrisdictitm of this Court as recanted inventories, to be merely n 111 l isterial, for they quoted that portion of the clause in the statute which ordered an inventory to be given upon oath to the Bishop or Ordinary, and inflicted • penalty oh ten pounds open either the Bishop or I hdinary who shall refuse to receive the invert tory. It was much to be doubted whether if the II beset of King's Bench had been attended by advocates in the lie cicalas; ice!Cntirts WllO %meld have argued upon what the cecina:est ice! law previous to the Statute had been, it would not have come to different eye:elution. Even before the Statute of !fogey the Eighth, Linwood, who once et that mime, admitted the jurisdiction of the Ecclesiastical ('ours in enforcing a full disclosure of the deceased's effects front the executors or wheanietrators I and Linwood wrote both before and after the Statute of Henry the Eighth was in ex. Wenn". tew:nheirn also confirmed what Linwood had written upon this point. He acid, that if any executor had metre goods of the testator's than were mentioned in the inventory, the same must be stated fully. bitch had been the old ecclesiastical law, and the contineed practice both byline and after tile Statute in ques tion. Now, what were the objects of this Statute? to limit the amounts of the fees to be taken fur probates of testaments: nod the whole of the preamble declared the floatation of fees. The only part respecting the inventories was In the middle of the fourth clause, occurring as it were incidentally. It stated that the execu:ur or czcor.en., or two other Worst men, should make, or cause to he made, a true and perfect inventory of all the ttoods, wares, chattels , an d merchandises, moveable or not moveable, soil shall cause to be delivered nn oath, taken before a Bishop or his Ordinary, and the other part to remain in the hands of the executers or administrators. It then went on to state the fres, and towards the conclusion it ie.:hetet! a penalty of ltd. upon the Bishop or Ordinary refusing to receive the inventory, so that this Art did little more than confirm the previous practice, with some additional formality ; it also regulated the fees, which were a Dotter of serious import. The eighth clause of this sta. tine rapressly reserved to the ecclesiastical law all its jurisdiction, I so that the Act, in fact, stated, that they should do every thing I concerning the same as before the Act, but they should take ro larger Ices than limited by the Act. The statute did cot make the jurist:joie* of the Court inertly ministerial in receiving possession I of an inventory, but by its purport intended that die Court should enforce a full and complete inventory. It seemed that this Act of Parliament had not been fully explained in the Court of King's Bench, otherwise the ease of " Henderson and French" might, perhaps, have been derided differently. If the Act had been in his (Sir J. Nichol's) opinion, rightly explained, it would have been the duty of this Court to pay all possible obe dience to the Court of King's Bench, as that Court was the most proper for deSoing Acts of Parliament. The Learned Judge then enumerated a number of cases, one of which, Shackleton v. Lord Barrymore (in wbich the present Lord Stowell was an advocate), decided in 17:114 bore exact reference to the present case, and after some further comments, gave it as his opinion, that the jurisdiction of the Court. respecting the question at issue, was evtablished long previous to the passing of the statute of Henry VIII., and in fact recognised by that statute, besides tho fact of the practice having been long exercised. lie was therefore of opinion that the widow had not given in a full and.perfect inventory, containing every re quisite information of the property of her husband. 01.0 lIAILET, W CPNESDAT, DEC. 9. This morning the Sessions terminated, when the RECORDER passed the awful sentence of death on die following ten unhappy malefactors, who were severally asked what they had to say why judgment should be stayed, via :—Lot Cartledge, Muer Ann Rycroft, ('. Ilctsworth, %Vm. Lilly, Wm. Harrison, Hannah Harriet Burton, Elizabeth . Buseley, and Caroline Mullins (two mere children), for stealing in a dwelling-boom ; Levi Abrahams, for burglary; and Robert Ball (whose judgment was milked from the September Strode:is), for setting tire to his dwelling-house. A biahama meld he hoists] tlutt hhicase would be taken into ennsi. deration. s he was precluded from calling witnesses to character, as they all lived at 111am:heater. which place he had lately left. Ball, who is a person of genteel appearance and address, ap peared deeply affected. The km:mine.* exhorted them all to betake themselves to the work of repentance and prayer, and prepare for that fate which certainly awaited some of them, at which period time would close upon them for ever. The prisoner f 'artledge addressed the Court at great length, and recapitulated those favourable circumstances which were laid before the Joey, and in the most solemn manner denied having committed the offence fee which his life was forfeited. The ;Axil, nt: le told hlm that the course he was pursuing was extremely impmper. as it went to impugn the verdict of the Jury who had heard and derided upon his cave. If, however, the prisoner had a petition to present u the throne of Majesty it would be very carefully attended to. The following were ordered to he transported fer life:— George Barton, Nicholas Clarke. henry Smith, {•illiam Carroll, Jeerer. Oldretield, and Mary Mitchell. For fourteen years:— Henry Moyer, George Harwood, and Humphrey Marks. For seven years John IVi~ke *, Riehard Jones. Samuel Cm7sen, Alesandcr White, Elia. Whitingham, James Molts, Jano,4 Riley, ChsrlEsi Beckett, Cornelius Donovan. James Baker, John Dories, Thomas ;Nagle, IVilliam Knight, James Goods in. John Jones. Maris Allen, George Ifunby alias Wilson, Jane Mine, Thomas Bryant, Frederic* Thompson, James Beauchamp, John Thomas, Thomas Jones, and James Cos. _ A great number were ordered to be imprisoned for vsrious periods. from three weeks to one year, in the House of Ent ettion—xime for shorter periods in Newgate, and three were ordered to be privately and one publicly shipped. Several judgment, were respired until nett Sessions, among whom was Bridger Lidbetter. Sessions was then adjourned until Thursday the 14th of January next. It will appear that there are only nine capital convictions at the late Sessions, which is a low number than has been known for many years. The aggregate quantity of crime, however, has rot di minished Lt the mornpolts—on the contrary, there have been 140 more committals during the last than in the preceding Mayoralty. POLICE. BOW-STREET. Ye sterdey (ladies Samuel Ocean Ares. Jean llama.:, and Gail. ignore Darnainc alias Detain. three Frenchmen, were bought' before Sir Richard llimie, and underwent a very long examination on the charge of having, by violent threats, extorted from Monsieur Thehommery. a French merchant, residing in the city of London, certain valuable securities, namely ?Asinine in a mercantile com mie, called " The Paris and Madrid Woollen Cloth Company." It appeared by the testimony of several witnesses, that some time ago a company of merchants In Paris obtained from the King of Spain a royal concession, for the exclusive manufacture of woollen cloths at 31wIritl, and agents were appointed by the Company in various pintail(' Europe for tin sale of shares. The agents in London were Messrs. Evatth and Thelenumery, of Bread-street, City, who had been entrusted with 1,0110 shares for sale. The banker far the Company at Paris is M. Verret. Sonic abort time ago the de fendants went to the gentlemen above-mentioned, and represented themselves to be employed by 31. Vernet, the l'aris banker, to raise money fur him upon the shares which Messrs. Evarth and The. I bommery had in their possession, and desired to be furnished with a quantity for that purpose. The shares were th n at about 431. per share, and were in the nature of Exchequer Bills, bearing in terest and payable at Madrid or Paris. Messrs. Evarth and The bounnery ref u sed to part with any of the shares until they were better satisfied that the defendants had authority to dispose of them. Drsanges pressed repeatedly to have some supplied to him, and said he knew a capitalist who would immediately advance too. ney upon them. After bring several times pressed to give the name of his capitalist. Desanges at length said it was Kin. near, who it may be recollectrd was one of the parties in a ease in the Court of King's Bench Rome six or seven years ago. The de fendants repeated their demand several times, and were as often positively refused, at which, it was stated, they became desperately enraged. A few evenings ago they went together to the private counting-house of M. Theboturnery, in Nicholas-lane, Lonshani street, and finding hint there alone, they commenced a series o!' threats, which were to lie put in exeaitien unless he gave up to them the share' which he had in his can possession . They said, among other things, that they would immediately putilislt a letter which should affect the credit of the Company, and also the credit of their (Messrs. Dearth and Thebominceys) house t and Bonnet, In a violent rage, swore he would plunge a poigeard in the bean of 31. Thebornmery, unless their demand was complied with. Under the terror of these threats, 31. Thebonimery gave up 290 of the shares in question. 31. Thebommery immediately conveyed information of this transaction to the company at Pans, and on Tuesday night 31. Pierre Audriel, one of the managing ppaurmere, arrived in London. end a warrant was obtained from Sir Richard Bantle for the apprehension of the defendants. The defence set up was, that they were authorised and employed by 31. l'ernet, the Paris banker, to raise money upon these shares In this country, he being a partner in the Company, and their banker. On the other side. it was denied that 111. Vernet had any power to give any such authority. The dt fendants said they had claims upon M. Veruet, and they should rot give up the share% until they were satisfied. The coniplainants said they would not object to the shares being impounded at this office, until it could be as.certained whether they hail any claim upcia .M. Vernet, and if they bad it should be settled; but they could not consent that the defendants should keep pussession of the shares. _ • At lengfli ltesanges went with an officer and Mr. Harmer, and brought the shares to the office, where they were tied up. and sealed with the official seat, and M. Andric] Using atliztd Lis own seal, they were depositei in the Magistrates' drawer. The defendants Domaine and Donna were held to bail In 1001. each, to keep the peace. lksanges, nut having himself and any direct threat, was discharged unconditionally. PATTON-BARDEN. yesterday Johri Gibbs, a lad about eighteen years of age, who described himself to be nn apprentice to his father, as a painter and glazier, was brought t.p in the custody of Limbrick, the officer, under the following circumstances : It appeared that the prisoner, from the evidence of Mr. Clones, shoptnan to Mr. Ramsay, a most respectable awnbroker, in Li quorpond-street. firay's-Inn-lane, went into his shop, and pre sented a watch for pawn, fur the low sum of is. The Altman, on examining it, found that it was a valuable gold repeater, and of mum sLopecting that the prisoner had become illegally possessed of it, he strongly interrogated him as to his place of residence, and how he became possessed of the watch, and as he prevaricated much on these points, he sent for Limbrick the officer, who took him into custody. When brought to the office, Lee, another officer, found in his hat a sheet of brown paper, which seemed to have been the envelop of some parcel. with a superscription_ •• Captain Eyre, 4, Crescent-place, Burton-crescent.' Some tooth. picks, with other trifling articles, were also found on the pri soner's person, who acknowl,alged that he had been at work at Captain Eyre's. _ Mr. litines stated, that the prisoner had another watch with him, which was certainly not of great ♦alue, but which increased the suspicion attaching to the manner in which he became possessed oe the miser. The prisoner, when sailed on to explain how he became possessed of the watch, gave a new Terilloll of his story, and said that he had found it. Mr. Chinos, on the part of Mr. Ramsay, stated, that his em. ployer was exceedingly anxious u• discover the imam and begged to know w:-.at course he should adopt. The Magistrate replied, that through the ordinary channels of publication, there was but little doubt the owner would soon be found. The prisoner was remanded until the facts of the ease has ob. tainvd publicity. The watch Is a small one, and appear to be a lady's. ARV.I.A-RONNE OFFICE. Information was yesterday received at this tidies. ef a male child, INTatently shout a fanlight old, having brat found about iota o'clock on Mond niht. exposed dine to the ar Lady Blacked'. h ous e , No. 16, Portman.aeseti of 7„ deb t The child has dark hair, dark bl ue eyes, and t , " ,„ * back of the neck. It had on a shirt, and over that tw o c .1., ° 1* gowns, and wa. then wrapped in two blanket.. protectel from the inclemency of its filluation, by t o u of which was of flannel. In addition to all this were j;r' wag wrapped in a blanket, and a shawl over the whole, is was deposited a paper parcel, containing a small powder, and also an open letter, in a tolerably g oo d writing, and whit+, from its contents, should epp ear to - heck . 7 written 14 the mother of the child. The followthgs a 4.6, 14 coPY " My dear Friend—Whoever you mar be, Tway h e ki nd t 4 blessed b a by ; it i s p overty alone that has induced ir my dear child, for I am left to God in t h e wide world. e to ;, -- ^1 have Peen him dead before me. happy should 1 hate hee s .3" has plotted God that he should live, and I hope God w i ll pr Ltt kiln through the world, and may the Almighty God gr ant ma fall into some dear Christian's hands, that he may h e care of. The tender baby i. a fortnight old, and a tine lerl boy. May the Almighty God defend him against a ~tur,,Prn for I feu he would not be taken care of ; but the kircbr my baby, the more abundant will be your harem in y thy n blessed kingdom above. Happy creature shcold I be, oh m know what would become of flint. and did I dare appr e .o 4 : place w h ere I left him ; happy should 1 be, could I ga t & more glance of my own flesh and blood, but fear will ke e ; from t. I have left some hair.powder fur the dear chill as r e an very tender ; but let me once more entreat my dear fried, t, kind to him. God grant that he could hue the breast, at h: young. Farewell my babe, no more I'll weep kw T . I despond, but trust that God will make my dear claw I~ eternal care. Farewell my dear baby, farewell. God gr im could come and see you ; may the bleating of God rebt‘t and protect you safely through the world, and God Mil reP, the person that takes care of my pretty boy." pe The child it now at the workhouse, where active tee.' being made for the discovery of it. parents. Captain Da!bne, of the Royal Navy, appeared to the , charge of Ttis connilainant, Wm. Jamieson, a lad shout IS y, stated. that lie lived with Mr. Christie, of No. 3, Greet Poi, street, and that the defendant occupied theprincipal tpan ww , the same honae. On Monday last, an he was going wi t w creet door, Capt. Dalton came up to him at,d said, •t rascal, if ever you dare even look at Mo. !hate° again,l7lb w hi p T oi l .` , Complainant answered, •t you, indee; you!" and was immediately struck by the Captain a ti‘ h .„ on the arm. The Captain admitted the assault, but denied that it vie tissue, and said that he hal been irritated by the 1.14'. imps. ,; at the trate, at.ti by what he had heard of his previous irt.ri r . towards Mrs. 1/4ltnn. Mrs. ihdion assured the If sgistmte, that the hey hol rs.'4 l 4 her repeatedly, and that be was ever seeking oppontoit, t .,F, noying her, by singing improper songs whenever he item down stairs. Mr. Itawt.tasow said his impertinence was very reptelm c but could not justify the assault, for which he mug mix t ., Captain to enter into his own recognizance. A gentleman, booted and spurre 4 , and who was undersold,: h. uncle to the complainant, here stepped fotward, and atatril,* 3 had come a considerable distance in the country to attend tot w. ing, and that he was determined to carry thechargs to tria,,f. cost him 10001. On getting into the outer office, he repetal• observati.m, and as a proof that he had the means or on doirc duciel a roll of notes, from which he showed t wo o f lOU tad. CHARGE OF MURDER. Tetterdar, at rnion.hall, a man n- nee Amtrore Cruel brought before the Sitting Illagistram, H. J. (*Amstar,' charged on buspicion of haring murdered a tr otuan - Bruton. One of the Overseers of the pariah of St. Saviour's.... stated, that the deceased was admitted into the workletue at parish on the 4111 instant, and she expired the following Ur. parish surgeon who attended her pronounced that she dud in, sequence of the typhus fever, but observed that her tonged bited a very extrannlimul appearance, being swelled to in mous size, and quite black, immediately subsequent to hr. Strong reports prevailed in the neighbourhood where the, had lived before she was taken into the workhouse, that her proceeded from the injuries she had received fr om t h e piss that on the night of the 24th of November, several posies reside in the unte street (Park street, Southwark) hart era " Murder !" proceed from the house in which the deemed Irde r td. and that the lodgers in the same house had sive stated, that r deceased having been indebted to her landlord (the prisoner), rent for her apartment, that individual was plainly beard treat her, by knocking her head against the well, the eel , which and her cries were distinctly heard. From these s stances, as well as a letter which was received by Mr. Gale, beadle of the pariah, they (the parish officers) considered it t duty to state the circumstances above related to the Magistrate. On hearing the above statement, as the prisoner Insane tt custody, the Magistrate directed that lie shoolg be ime apprehended, when Warman, the officer., undertook a:, secured hint at a sSort distance front the office. Ann Bruton. the deceased's daughter, was Vtathin3 stated, that on the night of the 21th of November, her ma*. appeared to be rather In liquor, came home and pmeeted stairs to her room. Soon after she entered the room witness out, in order to fetch a pint of porter for her own supper; be had scarcely gut two yards from the door when she hewn , mother call out "murder !" several times. %Vienna run hail the house in consequence, and found the prisoner knocking al into the door of her mother's apartment. Witness asked bins he did that for ? and he replied that he wanted to fasten he 11'itness told hint if he wished to make a prisoner of her, tads • proper manner, but not to fasten her up in her own room. prisoner made her no reply to this, but walked down rain; witness, on going into the apartment, observed her mother up against the wall, crying. Witness asked what was t with her; when she replied, "That murdering villain the prisoner) tried to throttle me." Witness desired her k in what way. Iler mother explained it by putting her hsed, nick, signifying the" her landlord had grasped her by the' and shook her violently against the wall. She appeared' after this, and witness put her to bed. Her illness tot when witness communicated her dangerous condition to th , officers, who removed her to the workhouse, where she day following that on which she was admitted. In reply to the Magistrate's questions, the witness de her mother had been drinking on the. night on which she 1 had received the injuries from Mr. Connell. The prisoner having been cautioned in the usual way nit tet awry the charge in the present stage of the proceedirp, ud wished to do so, intimated that as he was an innocent man. / no danger in telling the truth. Ile then proceeded to give& lowing account, which was taken down by the Chief Clerk : On the right mentioned, the deceased came home very' and attempted to walk up stairs, but was so overcome that she was unable to miseeet, - ;nd he seeing her in the Oulu which she was, assisted her up to her room ; after uhrh Ie down, and in about half an hour afterwards he hood a owe teed from the deccased's room, as if she and her &Ow" quarrelling, upon which he egain mended, and desired that noise should be made ; the old lady eructnut from w . en' hearing him, " to hell with you." The daughterhen s for beer, and before two minutes elapsed she came back e-• while he, witness, was in the act of fastening the doer. M in k ) hprevent the old woman from falling down the stairs and Ws' er bones. Ile was, he added, going to apply for warr..nts some of his neighbours, who had, since thcdcath niche old propagated a report in the neighbourhood that he had r her. It was a fake accusation, and he now hoped that 1 !) . - trate would not hold him in custody for an offence of which innocent. Ile had, he stud, witnesses to prove that instead Clem' ing the deceased with any violence, he had used every: his power in assisting her up stairs to her apartment. The surgeon who attended the deceased not being Phlr f • Magistrate remanded the prisoner until the result of the Inquest is known, and in the meantime directed that the be requested to examine the body o f the deceased minute-Y. The prisoner od'cred bail, but it was rejected. BIRTII. , On the 27th ult. at !Rehm, the Countess de Croistnare. 61 MARRIED. On the lith Instant, at Southern. in the county of U the Rev. George ('handier, D. C. 1.., Rector of that 'haplain to the Duke of Buctieuch, Henry TheinaeChamb r EN. of Stoney Thorpe in the above county, youngest see.t. Chamherlayne. Esq. of Ryes, Essex, to - Mary, only hid ward Ponies, Esq. of southam. On Tuesday, the 7th inst. at Winchelsca. in the eeer'" sea, Francis I iybbon Spilsburv, Esq. of Ball Ilaye, need , the county of Stamm!, to Eleanor, daughter of John Wright, Esq. of the former place. On Wednesday sc'nnight, at Bradford, Vorksbire. Rey. Henry !leap, Vicar of Branford, and Domestic the Right Honourable Lord Howard de Walden, to Hi daughter of Richard Fawcett, Esq. of Westbrook !lout On the Myth May last. at Cawnpore, Eau Licence, Cam. John Herring. Mb regiment Native Int. Aid-de-Camp to lien. Lumley, to Maria Ann, youngest of J. Wright, Esq., Paymaster of his Majesty's :nigh nlrim'' Foot. Irately, at Erwarton, Suffolk, Mr. //Melt Ting, 77, to Miss Mary Shemiarkl, spinster, aged 111. DIED. (hi the 3d instart, at his house at Le.itherhead. is Sam"' 72. Henry Reyna!, Lsq. At Park Dill, near Torquay, in the County of Pelvis, Rt ley, wife of Colonel htley, late of the 71 1 4 h lleginla't• •,r At his Mith.PCP, in Itlontaigue.place.. Cheltenham. on "- last, Peter Hum, Erg. Captain in the Royal Navy, touc h and regretted. At Petworth, Anne:, on &today last, aged 2 3 Yes r ‘ Sharpe, EN. youngest son of the late Charles Thom as • Dul. of 31elion, Suffolk. - - - _ WATER THIS 1/.11" AT LONINV4 tV Morning 10 min. after 2. I Afternoon If min. 0264 - Printe.l at TII I BRITISH PRESS ()Him by J. ir • tit titrand, and published by IL or the 4 Intik ten mdterc- The I, a4d ;'• dog.. is rm be. ' al t du* . 4,.k No, want', oftZ, • female het e is kr to har t 'AVERY beldray % 1)1 1 1.11 I ree nt TY: t ll I ld. G a r (AR E re b e " . int ;''d t not an d P"' 4 a great tha t 4 'fen e toe • 'Mewl pto ENT I w a wyrkLy t a hereby ird " Pi - ha — Nations ea! t5,,, t ,.. 4 r ot receiv Iti: AY, the I re for Sir, Id Ipt r-esra. r Catelhi? - so i t t dir • child. as by b ares arc all me friends s . it, the east, n a ued. and eP ror yelp, Sr dila 1L... ru t . New it'd Mtn it 01.1. b ud will Pire l e • Ti ire czetti rlit . • leading • re notice. to the:al,. stare, on 11 lock in the it 15 )eat the late Great Port • et the set ltttti••• yeas of !ging y,„ - 'rig and Vnu the Parish tddleses. ▪ ind, l e ; ari !umber r a hbury.hy al :hat it Vli waS I impe tus , e ondor viuus 1 %7 harlM:ne • 111 E CI onueiris.,r a , 1 the A rhe wen t a re effectua • luting the • 7 remehmck •genes Par XI" ErE ntrtit eats in the s, and for ondrrimoi y give d mated, ch Pawls atterd !helm EPAIRI 'gstalrtat,d•. • street be apes:a: l Farther r Dr NI doircps, Mee Ins • lOtiL end. waive °Tie One of V use Cretan tamales, Ls_ in raced 414- E CI • Sentliert, the .1 ukhowe of as • draw.' wic•uaa. TM • •n t", „T. u ; she 4 disd Meru ••• ey tongue cal. -i in the led in as err. and fur that ha ii' by gin til .erent th tgti t hel' y ffd r e ise dat , A ... d°nlPe°eTinßBF4tilli • i ' s y ral ta besni ted7t u hatil l ie: 23d -Tegn ' Pec tis an y t-d u ) heard d er e Fiats ‘ 4 , tP the i mam ' 1 ad , 14; • se'or prisom) . 3: re to be deli) the noise fa n these cleats Mr. at Office of " 'island it dm Magistrate. las atm del h • II F. CI• be imsydeter the AI ok t r ma, ard i effectual laving the I Xarna:4. *al nt's Parl her mothe.lb to in the d prreetedre and for om witnerar by give Ripper: bra ch Person' she limits • 'n PI Ilk as run Leak • •' of PAU knocking an: particular asked him ,Mt ty's Wood to fasten het:. I here Tendei if ha, to de tri, lIURSII.I own room. ire own rim; ad mother staed4 Olken of 11 t wan Ile Rise villain (memte MI ired her tr rate II F: (:( her biotite ter the A Er by the :bac • effectiti iPPeare.dwl ting the I Inns egen t .. an to the ern i ts in the Err allE 112,1:14 and foe br Rive a rts , i d he et - sta lwol ted tSit sa 'otw'ts, and Iv Sum or S wa y w t ter- POI7NDS, lirgu, Wes be authOribed to N g wan, hr & r the acid A( Ito Rife thgL l " Pieties are orr • ume od r ' mfre r t a t " inst ead gt h , uhe l t:le e tba ut hh;:d l • I l c bI1:k : h Via`oif4l it'l nett vit.ls"ltj'i.m.64n.. ;117t'lle.ills:he.an'el)il.;1174..ai.."-oCltlefSe:ick:rod.tytlt'flhell:ie23:ll.lepti.lV.er:i font tha , t l it v iia tti Tickei ifit: t . i i r w. lllll4l wh r: b l,7 l ; hack for rey teadangok . r et7tainty ninnfieAnt t. 16th Deret Wirfoltle of £2O h at the magtO ," . , c ll " l 'in are minut4y. a fo rt aft' ickyt 114 f • ?utter k Theontractor greatest rf Contractor 11'3-Inck• t h a t O o l fool -str w. ti:- I chanibeirlyra *win sly child of L' ! " 't 'Sirs of and 9 : c wont= 0 1 -' 0 inion to the ,tic t'hsp'i° heel will eat ilea,• by Sl aul t lh nia Pen re 'afoul , ", '"'"lt them urgent ' lung they , oth miaow :drawn, at only t o , widower. I thetrial Gee tab, -. 00 : 004„. in Serer. i Tho an Who • , ot S3II•i , much *m sd numeroui I r ays, r "cited and rhoms , variety and oft A ., hß ing-era "" of NUit i l P ill CA I. *m -fig IMO °1 ; and i NEXT