The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1826-02-13 00:00:00

FROM SATURDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE. •• weriE,: d eb.lo. 1826. • , • .• ORAN DU V. Alifl he.. to approve of the 32i1 Regiment of te ll ot=g onits colours and appointtnents, in addition to any other badges or devices which may Wave heretofore been granted to the Regiment, the words " Roleia," " Vimiera," • ryrennees," and ** Orthea," in commemoration of the distioguished services of the Regiment at the battle of Roleia, on 17th August 1808 • at Vionera„ on 21st August 1803 ; in the Pyrennees, in the months of July pa August 1813; and at Orthes, on 27th Feb ruary 1314. th Regimen . of Light Dragoons—Lieuteirint JAW/ Winsloe Philistines be Captain, by purchase. vice Wildman, promoted ; Comet Arthur Wm. Biggs to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice 6th Regiment of Foot—Lieutenant Humphrey Babington to be Captain, by purchase vice Brooksbank, promoted ; Ensign Wine Pigott to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Babington ; Wier, tient. to be Ensign, by purchase, vies Pigott. Ltkp ditto.Lnsign Peter Bernard to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Hunter, promoted Launcelot Bayly, (lent. to be Ensign, by purebace, vice Bernard. UNATTACHED. _ . Laptain John Wildman, i;O;rititelthCeil;t Dragoons, to be Major of Infantry, by purchase. 111E310RA N DA. Major Penne O'Keefe Boulger, upon the retired Bit of the 2d lterit Veteran Battalion, has been permitted to sell out of the servlct. _ _ • • The comunsawn of Lieutenant-Colonel Ilenry Fitzgerald, of art ItUth Foot, has been antedated to 2d September, 1823, but he has net been allcnred any back-pay. The conamission of Major Pearse, of the flOth Foot, has been antedated to 30th August, 182 b, but he has not been allowed any beck-pay. Commissions signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Westmorland. Thomas Butler Cole, Esq:7obeikputy Lieutenant ; Robert Oriaves, Esq. to be ditto. Commission signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the County of Cumberland. William Babson, Esq. to be Deputy Lieutenant. DECLARATIONS OF INSOLVENCY. Left at the Bankrupt 01Ere under Act 6 Geo. 4th, cap. le, sec 6. RICHARD HORNE, HOIOOVII-hill, and St. Augustin-place, Bristol, eiciernaker. (Tiled Feb. 7.) Hz YRY WooLcAstuz, Forest-gate, West-Ham, stock-dealer. (Filed Feb. 9.) Joux HOWLEY, Brydges-street, Covent-garden, and High. street, Kensington, broker. (Filed Feb. 19.) WILLIAM JOIIIISON, Dudley, Worcester, bootmaker. (Filed Feb. 10.) WILLIAM JAMES KING, Battersea, turpentine-merchant. ailed Feb. II.) BENT HOOD, Trafalgar-street, IVelennh.tead, baker. (Filed Feb. 11.) Tonsils.' FULTON, Cbaugo-alley, insurance-b Feb. 11.) BANKRUPTCY ENLARGED. Jaxics Rowatrrun se, Macclesfield, silk-manufacturer, from Jan. 17 to March I, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. BANKRUPTCIES SUPERSEDED. r. (Filed ROIIIIEaT iTRINER, littrafirS-112.11 Tavern, Basing-lane, wino. merchant. _ _ __ __ _ ELIZABETH BATT SKELTON, MART MADELLA SEEL. 'TUN, and ELIEMITTLI SKELTON, Southampton, 518H0116116 8.1 NKR P TS. 4.oßx HUSTLER LEACH, Leeds, printer, to surrender, Minh 1. 2, and 25 at eleven, at the Sessions-house; Wakefild. 31esars. Hurd and Johnson, Temple ; and Al essn. Carr and Barker, Wakefield. %VittLIAM PALMIt. Ooodge.street, near Totienham.court. told, wine.merchant, dealer and chapmaa, Feb. 21, at eleven, 2,, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Cour. Solicitor, 51r. J. Burton, Queen's-square, Bloomsbury. THOMAS PENMAN, Great-shire.lane, Temple-bar, victualler, ender and chapman, Feb. 18, at eleven, 21, and Alma: 2:4 at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Sir. Taylor, Clement's-lane. JOHN FREEMAN, Bristol, silk-mercer, dealer and chapman, Feb. 18, 25, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. So. !tenor, Mr. B. Hardwick, LANTINICO.I/elf. :onx Jsyrrar, Edward-street, Woolwich, tailor, dealer and chaoman, Feb. 21, 28, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' COWL Solicitors, Messrs. Fisher and Spencer, Wa . - !Or. ROIItIRT WIROOTI and Jolt, 001.01 E. Great Tichfield.strect. hnen..drapers, dealers and chapmen, Feb. 18. 2S, and March 2.3, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. D. Jones, Sise. lan*. TMOXAS RIDER BOYS, Nicholas-lane, broker, dealer and chapman, Feb. Id, 23, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court- Solicitor, Mr. Young, Charlotte.row, 31ansion-house. RICHARD BASIL STRUGNELL, Threadneedle -street, boot. n:aker, dealer and chapinar, Feb. 14, Ti, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, 3lessrs. Ilodgeon and Burton, ...:,alisbury-street, Strand. °totem Lwwt, Cecil-street, Strand, tailor, dealer and chap. man, Feb. 14,'35, and March 26, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. W. Richardson, IValbrook. IV RICHARD HUDSON and ILLIAM TMO3fAS BORES, City. canal Rope-ground, Blackwell, rope-makers, Feb. 21, at ten, 25, at twelve, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, News. Dawn and Chatfield, Angel.court, Throgvnorton-street. JOHN CLARAOT, Ureat Bcll-alley, Coletnamstreet, warehouse men, dealer and chapman, Feb. 21, 28, at eine, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Messrs . Thomas and At. liaison, New Basinghall.street. WILLIAM CIINDET and JOHN CUNT/ET, Holymoorside, BIT. bydrire, eotton.twiat-manufacturer, dealers and chapmen, Feb. 22, at three. 23, and March 25, at eleven, at the Angel Inn, Ches. terfield; Derbyshire. Solicitors, Messrs. John and William Lowe, Tanfield-eourt, Temple ; and Mr. W. B. Thomas, Chesterfield, Derbyshire. JOHN PRITCHARD, Portwood, Cheshire, plumber, dealer and chapman, Feb. 24, 25. and March 25, at nine, at White's Hotel, Manchester. Solicitors, Mr. Norris, John -street, Bedford-row ; and Messrs. Rymer and Norris, Ma rsden -street, Manchester. JOAN HOLLIDAY, Rochdale, Lancashire, victualler, dealer and chsoman, Alareli 2 at four, 3, at nine. and 25, at eleven, at the Reed or Commercial Inn, Rochdale. Solicitors, Messrs. Hurd and Johnson, King's Bench-walk, Inner-Temple ; and Mr. Baker, Rochdale. WILLIAM WEND, Cooper-bridge. Bradley. Yorkshire, vic tualler, dealer and chapman, Feb. 23, 24. and March 26, at twelve, at the Sessions-House, Wakefield. Solicitors, blesses. Foljainhe and Dixon, Wakefield; and Messrs. Heming and Baxter, Ong's. I nn.place. RICHARD THORNIER and JOHN Brientoaornn. Yate and Pickup Bank. Lancashire, calico-printers, Feb. 27, at four, 21i, at ten, and Much 25, at twelve, at the Hotel, within Blackburn, •Laacashire. Solicitors, Maus. Neville and Eccles, Blackburn ; and Messrs. Milne and Tarry, Temple. JOHN WILKINSON. Keighl” , , Yorkshire, worsted-spinner and manufacturer, Feb. 21, at six, 22, at ten, and March 25, at twelve. at the DevesslUre Anus Inn, Keighley. Solicitors, Messrs. Still and Raymond, IJacoln's.lon•New-Square ; and 3lr. Christopher .Nether wood, Keightey. DANIEL. LLOYD and NATHANIEL LLOYD, Uhl, Gloucester shire, clothiers. dealers and chapmen. March I, at fire, 2, and 23, at ten, at the Old Bell Inn, Duesley, Gloucestershire. Solicitors, Masers. Vaud and Blower, Linculn's-Inn-Fields ; and Messrs. V isird and Buchanan, Dursley, Gloucestershire. THOMAS MILLS, SlOcktoO-RpOR-Tees, Durham. corn and pm vision merchant. dealer and chapman, Feb. 23, 24, and March 23, at eleven, at the Black Lion Hotel, Stockton•upon-Tent. Soli. sitars. blew.. Bell and Brodrick, Bow Church-yard ; and Mr. Garbutt, farm, Yorkshire. JOLEPTI PUILDIai, Birmingham, merchant, Feb. 20, 21, and March 26. at twelve, at the Royal Hotel, Birmingham. Solicitors, Misers. Swain, Stevens, Maples, Parse, and hunt, Frederick. place, Old Jewry ; and Mr. WhateleT, Birmingham. PETER Rosinsow, Claypole, Lincolnshire, milliner, dealer and chapmaa, Feb. '24, 25, and March 25, at twelve, at the Hotel, Newark-upon. Trent, Nottinghamshire. Solicitors, Mr. Robert Csparn. Newark.upon-Trant and Mr. Robert Capes, Holborn. court, Gray's-Inn. WILLIAM IIi:ORES, Liverpool, eoal.nterchant, dealer and &amen, March 15, 14, and 25, at twelve, at the Bell Inn. iVor aster. Solicitors, Mr. Cecil Bede, Devonshire -street, Queen. square ; and Mr. Hill, Worcester. THOMAS WATSON, Bristol, innholder, dealer and chapman, lab. 20, 21, and March 25, at twelve, at the Rummer Tavern, Bristol. Solicitors, Mr. Richard Dix, Symond's-Inn, Chancery. lane ; and Mr. Joins Henry Frank* Exchange-buildings, Bristol. Tito ;was Glass, Devonport, Devonshire, tallow-chandler, dealer sad chapman, Yeb. 21, 22, and March 25, at eleven, at the Weak ley's Hotel, Devonpurt, Devonshire. Solicitors, Mr. B. W. Sole, A idermanbury ; and Mr. James Oilbard, Devonport. EDWARD CORDINGLEY, Cheltenham, builder, dealer and chapman, Feb. 27, 28, and March 23, at four. at the York Hotel, Cheltenham. Solicitors, Sir. William Read King, Serjeant's-Inn, neet.strect ; and 31ewas. Strafurd and Prince, Cheltenham. THOMAS BURDEN and EDWARD BURDEN, Stourbridge, Worcestershire, drapers, dealers and chapmen,Teb. 20, at lye, 21, and 31arch 25, at eleven, at the Wheat Sheaf Inn, Bewdley, Woe eestarshire. 'Solicitors, Attie's. Still and Raymond, Lircoln's-Inn ; and blesses. Roberts and SOU, Stourbridge. Worcestershire. EDWARD DROLL DISOWNS anti ROBERT THroSALD, Norwich, waolstaplers, dealers and chapmen. Feb. 27, March I. and 25, at lour, at the Swan Inn, Norwich. Solicitor. Mr. Joseph Lythgoe, Estes.strect, Strand; and 31r. W. Dc France Barker,' Norwich. TKOMAS RICHINGS, Thavies inn, scrivener and broker, Feb. 14, at eleven. 25. and March 26, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, SD. Peachy, Salisbury.aquare, Fleet.street. WILLIAM CLAREE and ANDREw DINSDALE, Frederick's. place, Old Jewry, yun-inerchants dealers and chapmen, Feb. IS et twelve, 25, at one, and March 25, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Maus. Kearary and Spurr, bothbury. Joesige Baaxow and Jot's DOERING, New-road, St. Geoespia-in.the-Less, sugar-refiners, dealers and ehapmen, Feb. 11, 25, and Muds*, eleven, at the Bankrupts ' Court. Solid. tor, Mr. E. W. Aabliali k Lawrenee-lane. PRAJOCIS WILLIAM PRATHERSTONE and If ARRT NEVILL, Ada m e &egu rt. Bread. merchants, deaden and ebapmen, Feb. 1 11, et ebrows, re& now sa. at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Sagetw as , m aisra , o w e, /vitae, and Carr, Itasinghall-street. JAatas Bustart,lll4catltltD Dozcca,and ROHL*? Bin Lin; Austintrisos, merchants and insuranee-brokers, Feb. 21, 28, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Mews. Blunt., Roy, and Blunt, Liverponl-stmet, Broad.atteet-buildings. ROMAIN Bouoma, George-street, Adelphi, diamond-met. chant, Fob. 14, at one, 21, and March 26, at twelve, at this Bank rupts' Court. Solicitor, Messrs. Willis, Watson, Bower, and Tokenhouse-yard, Lothbury. WIL L lAIK F TZWILLFAN Ho w, South Sea Chambers, Thread needle-street, merchant and insurance-broker, dealer and chapman t Feb. 14. at twelve. 25, and March 25, at one, at the Bankrupts Court. Solicitor. Mr. Brough. Shoreditch. (:reastr Es PAUL, Blandford-mews, Blandford.street, cabinet. maker, dealer anti chapman, Feb. 14, at one, 21, and March 25, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. Fasmote, Iron monger-lane, Barth 'amen BURKETT, New-Street, BillilOplgitt, men. merchant, Feb. 14, at eleven, 28. and March 25, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Messrs. Walton and Gliddon. Ginner s.hall, Bastrighall-street. Or iv en Lurk . , Bristol, timber-factor, dealer and chapman, Feb. 20, 21, and March 25,at one, at the hummer Tavern, Bristol. Solicitors, :Messrs. (licks and Braikenridge, Bartlett's-buildings, Holborn ; and Mr. J. P. Hinton, Bristol. WILLIAM PLUNKETT and Joux BATKIN, Old-street.roacl, timber-merchants, Feb. 14. and March 2, 25, at ten, at the Bank rupts' Court. Solicitors, Messrs. Keeling and Neck, Tokenhouse yard. FRANCIS WIIATMAN, Amelia.row, Spa-road, Bermondsey, currier, dealer and chapn.an, Feb. 21, at nine, 28, and March 25, at ten, at the Bankrupts Court. Solicitor, Mr. Watts, Dean -street, Canterbury-spare. tonal( BaannoN, Gray's Inn-square, bill-broker, dealer and chapman, Feb. 21, 28, and March 25, at ten, at the Bank. rupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. lord, Great Queen-street, West minster. iftliftaiiamm•iii..__ DIVIDENDS. March 4. Alexander Cuthbert, Thomas Brooke. and George Robert Cuthbert, Gutter-lane, merchants, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court—March 4. Francis Dent and John Mannet, Southampton, linen-drapers, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court--March 4. John Burge, Bristol, butcher, at one, at the Commercial-rooms, Bristol —3larch ii. William Ridley and Daniel Wilson, Whitehaven, carders, at three, at the office of Michael {Volker, {Vhitehaven— Ma►ch 21. Robert Rainey, Site-lane, merchant. at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court-31arch 11. James Grange, Piccadilly, C3vent gardee, and Fingsland-road, fruiterer, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court—March 4. lasso Worthington, Manchester. draper. at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court—March 11. Richard George Pain, Lloyd's Celtee-house, and Brixton, Surrey, underwriter, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court—Feb. 18. William Wood Sanderson, and John Sanderson Nicholas-lane, Lombard-street, and Martin's-lane, Cann on.street. insurance-brekers. at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court —March 4. J. Read. Love-lane, Lower Thames-street„ victualler, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court—March 4. John Whitaker, St. Paul's Church.yard, masie-dealer, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court —Feb. 18. Charles Pearson, Grosvenor.place, Surrey. grocer, at twelve, at the Bankruts' Court—March 4. William Jefferys, Qua- Brant. Regent.street, painter, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court— March 4. George Henley. Strand, cheesenionger, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court—ltlarch 4. Richard Gascoyne, Richmond, Surrey, tailor, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court—March 4. John Bird and Henry Bird, Bartlett's.buildinga, jewellers, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court—March it. William Callis Conic, Welling borough. Northamptonshire, Ince-dealer, at eleven, at the Hind Inn, IVellingborough—March 4. Ann Eaatcot Binns. Bath, book seller, at twelve, at the White Lion Inn, Bath—March 4. John Lush and William Lush, High Holborn, distillers, at eleven, at the Bankrupts' Court. CERTIFICATES—MAncR 4. - William Asprey, Bruton-street, Hanover-square, silversmith— George Lunn, Halifax, chymist—John Stanstield, Hanroyd, Hali fax, reed-maker—Charles Jarritt, Bath, hatter—Thomas Glover, Derby, brush-manufacturer—Abraham Moss, High-street, Shad well, slopseller—Joseph Horn, Liverpool, pump-maker—Charles Goodenough, Fleet.atreet, baker—George Wilson, Constitution. row, Gray a Inn-road, corn-chandler—John linden, Upper John. street, Fitzroy-square, architect. SCOTCH SEQUESTRATIONS. JAMES Taint-on. Whitburn, baker and farmer ; creditors to meet in the Sheriff Court-house, Linlithgow, Feb.2l and March 7, at twelve, for the first and second public examination ; at Donald M'Kenzie's, innkeeper, Linlithgow, March 8, at ten, for the first general meeting; at the office of Nisbet and Peebles, writers, Glasgow, March 21, to choose Commissioners. ARCHIBALD CIAGHORN, Leith, merchant; creditors to meet In the Exchange Hotel, Leith, Feb. 16, at one, to name an interim factor ; and March 9. at one, to elect a trustee. ALEXANDER 111.15AELL, Glasgow, auctioneer and builder; creditors to meet In Macpherson and Machlachlan's chamber., South Hanover-street, Glasgow, Feb. 28, at twelve, to instruct trustee. _ _ --...... Arum LANDET.S, Edinburgh, builder; creditors to meet in the Royal Exchange Coffee-house, Edinburgh, Feb. 15, at one, to choose an interim factor ; and March 8, at one, to elect a ttuatee. JOHN TAYLOR, Galloargate-street, Glasgow. grocer and mer. chant; creditors to meet in the Lyceum Rooms, Glasgow, Feb 15, at one, to name an interim factor; and March 1, at one, to elect's trustee. . . THOMAS blit.l.En. Edinburgh, distiller; creditors to meet in the Royal Exchange Coffee-house, March 1, at one, to settle offer of composition. DEUCHAR and ZIEGLER, Edinburgh. cloth-merchants: cre ditor to meet in the Royal Exchange Coffeehouse, Edinburgh, Feb. 14, at one, to name an interim factor; and March 1, at one, to elect a trustee. . _ JAMES WAT L IWO. Kilmarnock and Ay - r, innkeeper; creditors to meet in the Sheriff Clerk's office, Ayr, Feb. 20 and March ti, at twelve, for public examinations ; at the Black Bull Inn, Ayr, Itlateh 7 sad 41, at twelve, to elect commissioners, and Instruct trusts& PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. William barge and John &lineman, Vere. street, Clare-market, and Savoy-wharf, tallow-melters— Benjamin Mather and Richard Hudson Telfer, New-street, Covent-garden, hosiers—John Smith and John Columns, Hastings, bricklayers—Kirk Boot and Thomas Curtis Gale, Bermondsey, soap.makers—H enry Farncomb, Ickle sham, Sussex, Edward Wenham, Hastings, Thomas James Breeds, same place, and Charles Deudney, jun., Gentling, Sussex, linte-burners--John Clarke Crucefix and John Smith, Strand, blacking-manufaeturers—Samuel Crane and James Patrick Mur phy, Stratford. Essex, turpentine-distillers—Robert Deeker and Edmund Kent, jun., Little Walsingliam, Norfolk, attorneys_ Reuben Moore, William °reeves, and George Cobb, Newark upon-Trent, bobbin-net-manufacturers—John Crowther and Abra ham Crowther, Halifax, cardanakers--Joseph Carstairs and Archi. bald Trail. Lombard-street, writing-masters--Louis Michael Simon and %Valiant Lightly, Fenchurch.street, brokers—William Hayden and William Ash, Oxford-street, silk-mercers—Rohert Hitchcock and Samuel Hitchcock, Woolwich, brokers—William Sutton and James Ingham, Manchester, confectionery—Henry Rowles Thomas and Henry Holloway, Hanover -street, Hanover. square, booksellers—William Guarani and Thomas Dobson, Strand, tailors—Jeffery Jolly and Alexander Vincent Berard, Little Pordand-street, Marylebone, paper-stainers—James Hun nybun and Thomas liunnybun, Cambridge, coach-makers—John Wilson and R. Macy/ hirter, Battle, Sussex. drapers--W.Cornforth, W. Price, and 11. Gibbs, Hungerford-wharf, Strand, coal mer chants,so far as regards the said V.. Price—C. J. Carter and .1. Har tnett, Dean-street, Soho, and Oxford -street, builders—O. Noakes and Henry Noakes, Sutton, Surrey, farmers--Thomas Briggs, John Ganiiner, Samuel Woodroffe, James I/owlr, and W. Prichard, Chepstow, Monmouth, and Tidenham, Gloucester, brick. makers_Charles Edward Pownall and Henry Spencer l'apps, Old Jewry, attorneys—Sarah Miller and Charles Miller, Old street, linen-drapers—Joseph Storey and Richard }llama, Liver. pool, ironmongers—Joseph Hunt and George Suggett, Fenchurch street, ironmongers—T. Al. Sutton and IVilliam Makin, Liverpool, commission-agents—William Henry Fisher, John Toiler, and William Orton Aikin, Conduit-street, chymists--Alexander 141`Donald and William Henry Rotten, Bentink-street, Soho, working-jewellers—Robert Milligan and Walter Milligan, Brad ford, drapers—Samuel Standring and Benjamin St/uniting, Birstall, York, doffing-plate-makers--Peter Statham and Richard Green. wca Manchester, furniture-pa:Ater—Charles Frederick Collier and Henry Jcanncret, surgeons. The average price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar. computed from the returns made in the week ending the 11th day of February, is 11. 14 , . Hid. per hundred weight, exclusive of the duties or Customs paid or payable thereon on the importation thereof into Great Britain. Average price of Corn from the returns received in the week ending February 4, 1826. Wheat. Barley. Oats. I Rye. Beans. Pease. a. d. a. d. a. d. s. d. a. d. a. d. 61 1 37 24 4 41 b 139 9 41 MIDDLESEX HOSPlT•l..—Montbly Return of Patients from the Ist to 31st January : In-patients, admitted by letter . Ditto accidents Out-patients, admitted by letter Ditto accidents • 123 20 -143 128 - 149 -277 Total 420 In-patients discharged 135 Remaining in the Hospital DREADFUL SulictDE.—On Friday night last a young man of respectable appearance, who seemed to have just arrived from the country, called at the house No. 31, John -street, Fitzroy. square, and, inquiring for a gentleman lodging in the first door, he was introduced to him, when he requested to have a lodging for the night, u he had come from 31anchester to arrange some private bunnies, and would shortly return again. An apartment wse We. pared for his accommodation, and at ten o'clock he went to bed in a dejected state of mind g OD the following morning, about six o'clock, the inmates of the were disturbed by something fall. ing, and on entering the pS they discovered the unfortunate young man lying on the Am with Maimed nearly levered from the body with a penknife, OM WO by hie side. A rumens was sent for, but the wound um dip amoral osausder his efforts of any %veil. The deceased, it ie conjoining. NW M London in consequen.e of some peeuniary embarnmeeens, whit& led as the fatal termination of his existence. A Gown limpet we be held on the body this day. THE BRITISH PRESS. SZTOSII TUC BOLLB(.;OURT. OZAZAAL CITITION DAY AT THE ROLLO TO•MOIRSO'W, AT AIMS IN TAZ MOAXIX4I. Monning•Thesiger In re Stocker Bevil' • Re• 111 Price • Williains Bower v Edmunds Cfmmbers•Collins Jones • Strong Fish • Klein Price • Crump Johnston * Ure Courtey • Vincent Williams • Coed* Jamere • Peaches Fynmore v Morley Smith • Nelson il'est • Lochley Griffiths • Fynmore Robson • Norris Somiiel • Samuel Rumsey • Perry Allen • Callow Culling • Spencer Browne • Elppingull Strong, Ingram Thornborrow • Townshend v Pritchard • Ripley Thornborrow Townshend Askin • Gilson Blackburn • Walker Hodges v Dale„ Newman • Ilibbet Hughes v Inglis Mayes • YouelF . Freeman • Fairlie Harvey • Harvey In re Winship " Emery • Attorney. Freeman • Fitirlte Follner • Marriot General In re Waltham Cha- Brodie • Barry Browne • Blaird rity Jervoise v Clarke Ker • Clobery Clarke • Clarke Hunter , Boyd Samuel • Hall Davis • Basire Brodie v Grooni- Browne • Groom- llelegil vßrewer Willard v Wllloby Exparie Ilaseler Forman ♦ Gibbs Short caws at morning. bridge Forster ♦ Forster Collis , Blackburn bridge Splidt • Mossy West • 'Ackley Rolls on Wednesday next, at ten in the COURT OF KING'S BENCH. MIDDLIIIIX COMMON JVUIES TO-MORROW, AS MALF-PAST NINE. • Eerie • Ellison Grintield • Lomas Barnard • Baines Churchill • Gude Hewlett • Railton learn • Taine Dawson • Whittaker Creswell v Bromley Doe,'on the demise of Broome v Winter Hamilton • Radford Richdale, • Calla- Shaw • Copland 1 (Irian • Bedford nan TheKingvH.Brandt Morris • Broatlfoot Cooper • Brown B utterwort h e Ao. Hall • Burgess Doe, Az. • Mills theram Miller • Osborne Low • Stunner Cowell • Yellowley Doe, Ac. • Moore Kilman • Punter Graham v :plats Doe,&c.v Thompson Same v Same Doe, on the demised Baron v Jones, Esq. (lye • Soothes Knight, v Rowe Penn v Lewer Hilgate • Sowter Jarmain • Algae Colvin v Henson Dawson • Garry The Lord Chief Justice will sit to hear causes in Middlesex to. morrow, Wednesday, and daily till Wednesday the 22d Feb. Middlesex Special Juries are appointed for Saturday, Feb. 18, Monday, Feb. 20, and two following days. London Special Juries are appointed for Tuesday Feb. 28, Wed. natality Alareh 1. and three following days. Adjournment Day, Thursday, Feb. 23. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. MIDDLESEX COMMON JURIES TO•MORROW, AT HALP•PAST NINE. REMANENT. Garrott •Buekthorpe I Whitmush & others I Doe v Dyball Pibel v Meredith • Oke and another Godson,gent.• Lewis Williams v Uarrod Felton • Mills NEW CAUSFS. Ashby and another ♦ Davies v Strulhen Chambers v W.Wil- Voy Harris v Creswell son Ackely v Martin I Chambers aH. Wit- Chidley a Bull Lacon a Chambers sun London Juries, IVednesday, 1 eb. 15. COURT OF EXCHEQUER. This day (Monday, the 13th inst.) being the last day of Tem, Motions only. LAW INTELLIGENCE. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, SAT VIIDAT, Pl 3. 11. NEGRO SLAVES. THORLEY v. BYRNE. This was a bill fileclWthCe;eit;tore of late Earl of Crawford and Lindsay, against his next of kin, to obtain the directions of the Court with regard to the measures to be taken in order to carry into effect the provisions of his will. By this will, after leaving a sum of 10,0001. to the children of the defendant, besides some other legacies, he bequeaths half the residue of his estate for the disse mination of the Bible, and for translating it into Chinese, and the otherhalf was to be given to his" poor negroes" in Antigua,who were to be kept employed, either on the plantation which he then pos sessed, provided the lease, which was about to expire, could be renewed, or on another estate which it was his intention to pur chase, or by sending them out to task-work, if neither of these de signs could be accomplished; in the meantime they were to be edu cated and instructed in the Bible, and in the year 1832, when the testator calculated that they would be in a situation to use their freedom without abusing it, he directed the sum bequeathed to be equally divided among thew, and in 1833 they were all to be eman cipated. It was argued by the Counsel for next of kin, that the legacies being of an uncertain nature could not be carried into (rect. Mr. HEALD said it would he necessary to have the directions of the Court in order to execute the will, and the Court would have considerable difficulty in acting upon such an occasion. The testa tor had not himself acted with prudence, and the Court would re quire a double portion of prudence to carry his will into execution. The communication of the will to the slaves was very much to be deprecated, for if they were once apprised that they would be li berated at the period mentioned, their impatience would in all pro ' bability produce an insurrection, and endanger the peace or even the existence of the colony. There would be a great deal of diffi culty too with regard to the moiety of the residuary property which was to be paid to these negroes. It would be difficult to determine how they were to be instructed, how they were to be relieved ac cording to tile intention of the testator, and how the money in ques tion was finally to be given them on their emancipation. These questions must no doubt be referred to the Master. The only dif hculty in the will was this respecting the negroes ; but if the Court should think the objects of the testator impracticable, the question would then be between the Atiorney-General and Byrne, in order to determine whether these funds, which were evidently intended for charitable purposes, were not to be appropriated to some other object of the nature. At present they had only to bring the different parties before the Court in order that they might state their views. Mr. HART wanted to sec what the Attorney-General, with Master Stephens, could do in this affair. No testator could have put the means of destruction in thepowcr of the negroes as this one has done. All the property must devolve on the relations. Mr. HoupELL said the negroes could not maintain themselves. It would therefore becomes question out of what fund they were to be maintained. By the colonial laws it appears that a slave can take a legacy in that island, but they seemed by the will to be incapable of taking the legacy at ptesent, to which they would eventually become entitled. Who, he inqu'Netl, are to have the legacies in the meantime ? Some of the present slaves might be dead before the legacy became due; some might die with Issue. It is impossible at present to know who will at last become entitled. Could there be any Suspension of the grant, 'so as to delay its effect till the time appointed, and to enable the re presentatives of those who would have been entitled to claim at that time in their place. As to the part of the will which regards the translation of the Bible into Chinese, if the funds cannot be, so applied, arid if it can be proved that its appropriation in that way is not for a charitable puriame, then the next of kin, no doubt, might put in their claim; but if the different legacies were held by the Court to be fur charitable purposes, it might then apply the funds to some other charitable purposes, so as to fulfil as nearly as possible the intentions of the donor. At the time when the will was drawn up the testator intended to renew the lease of the plan tation on which the negroes then were ; but being unable to do so, he bad formed a design of purchasing another estate, on which he intended to place them. In this too his intentions had been frus trated, and the slaves were now under the care of an agent, who had placed them at task-work; but the course w hi c h b e b a d pur sued with them was unknown, and that would be one principal ob ject of the inquir It was also su ggested by Counsel, that as the testator gives part of his property to his " poor negroes," and as it was his wish to procure another estate, or to employ them in task-work, it would be right that the Court should carry that part of his will into execution, and cense them in the meanwhile Er be educated and instructed in the Bible, as half of the residue of the estate is to be distributed among them. Mr. likst.o.—But i am informed that there will be no re sidue. The VicE.CtsarmEt.t.on said that it would be proper, there. fore, first to take an account of the estate, and of the nsgroes, at the death of the testator ; and whether any of them had since died, and what issue had been burn since. Mr. HART suggested that it was not proper to include the slaves as part of the estate, as they were " subjects of bounty, not pro. perry." The VICE-CHANCELLOR said they were property, and if ne- Cense', they must be sold to pay the debts on the estate. They are assets fur the debts of the testator. Sell the legatees! exclaimed Mr. LIMIT. (A laugh.)—lle said the testator lied directed, if the lease of the tract of land which he possessed in the island could not be renewed, and if no other land could be procured, then the negroes should be kept at task work, as they now are. If the question were referred to the Master, whether this was for their beneht, the. Master would find that this task-work is the worst of all slavery. Ile knew that slaves were sort on such work to a great distance from their residences, and that they suffered much misery in conseq ue n ce . The VICE-CHANCELLOk said that must not be permitted in this ease. HAIT said it would sometimes he impossible to find work in the neighbourhood of their residences. Mr. HEALD said they were new let out at task-work. The VICE-CHANCELLOR observed, that the Court would be under the necessity of appointing some person in Antigua to take charge of them, with directions that they should be educated and Instructed in the manner appointed by the testator, and that they should be employed in teak-work on the same principle till the year IBM. Mr. HART said there would be a difiulty in finding a person who would assume such a responsibility. There would be a great deal of trouble and urn's, without any apparent interest accruing to W.in Win it. The tics.Crtancet.Lon said be could not be at any ex pense. The labour of the Devon Irould certainly be suffisient to maintain them. Mn HART remarked, that ere:y negro on such an !Stab as that which the testator had possessed would cost twenty or thirty pounds for his food and clothing. The VICE*CHANCELLOU again stated that the Coati would appoint some one to take care of the negroes. Mr. Roy ritt.t. suggested that it should direct the Master to in. quire who had the care of them at present, as it might be proper to continue the present agent in the charge of them. It appeared that he had acted with great prudence—he knew that he had not pub liaised this will. This was extremely proper ; for if the slaves were once informed that they had a prospect of such emancipation, they would immediately leave their work, and would no longer remain under the sli , Meet degree of control. The Vic i-CtrawcELLoa agreed that they must not be is. formed of the circumstances, as it would immediately destroy all fultordination among them. Air. HEALD thought the Court could not do any thing more than simply make the inquiry concerning the amount of the estate, and the number and employment of the slaves. There were some difficulties which the Court could not relieve. There were no funds for their maintenance—there was no residue of the estate to be dis tributed among them. Aluch of she will could not be executed. It was difficult to know what was to be done. They were now at task.work ; but there were no funds, and if that task-work were ex hausted, the agent could nut be expected to keep them. There was no property, eat that they must be sold, which the Court cannot permit. The VicE.CHAscELLon asked if Mr. Heald was instructed to state that the stares were no property ; and added that every pur. pose in a will was equally legatory. Mr. HAUT remarked that the question had been raised In the Cockpit, whether the owner, by giving a legacy to a slave, does not emancipate him by that very act. Alr. ItoUPELt replied to this by observing that the question was yet undecided, whether those now living were in reality the legatees, or those only who should be living and belonging to the testator's estate in 183.3. - • The VICE-CHANCELLOR said the expense of teaching and instructing them in the Bible was a legatory bequest, and must therefore be kept. What he would do would be, to order, in the tint place, the usual accounts as to estates and legacies, then an inquiry what negroes were upon the estate at the death of the tes tator, which of them have since died, what additions have been made to their numbers by births since his death, how they have been maintained and employed since that period, under whose care they now are, whether there are in the island means of employing in task work such 'tepees in future; and then he would refer it to the Master to inquire, whether by the law of Antigua these legacies are not good legacies. This last should properly have been a pre vious inquiry, but he would allow it to go along with the others In this case. His Honour then inquired whether it was necessary to direct any inquiry about real estate, and observing that he had got a copy of the will, signed by three witnesses so as to make it pass as real estate, he directed that the Master should inquire whether the testator died seised of any real estate, and again recited the par ticulars of the inquiry thus amended. Mr. HART mentioned that, by the laws of Antigua, no owner of slaves was permitted to emancipate any of them without making a provision for their support. The VICE•CHANCELLOR added, therefore, that the Muter should be at liberty to state any circumstances specially that might bear on the subject. Mr. Hutr wished that the Muter should be directed to inquire where the slaves were actually domiciled. They generally work at a great distance from their habitations, which are usually in vii. loges, and they are accustomed to cling to these with an attachment of which we can form no conception. It was therefore to them a great calamity to be thus carried away to a distant part of the country on task work. Mr. Hart observed farther, that the testator died in February, 1925, and that their present place of residence was now very uncertain. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said if they thought proper the might also take the inquiry where they were resident at the death of the testator, and where they were Dow resident. It was asked whether his Honour might not think proper to refer these inquiries to Master Stevens, as he WAS very conversant with these subjects ; but The VicE-CfrawcELLon. said he could not consent that it should be referre&to any but the Master of the day, and added that the parties must be at liberty to prove the will as will for real estate.—inquiries granted. COURT Of KING'S BENCH, SATURDAY, Fi.. it. TILE KING t. HALL AND OTHERS. These defendants had been convicted of a nuisance. in carrying on the busmen of slaughterers of horned cattle in Warwick-lane. They were now brought op for judgment. The defendant Mr. Ilall entered into his personal recognisance of 5001. to abate the nuisance. The cases of the other defendants were postponed until next Term, in order to give them time to make proper arrange ments for the abatement of the nuisance of which they had been guilty. LAW NOTICES. COURT OF CHANCERY. , ICI-CILISCII.I.OIII 71:111 DAT AT HALT-TACT tsx. For judgment—UM r Reardoq. THE KING v. HARDWICKE. This defendant:Siiejthoir 17, the son of an at Bridg north, having been convicted at the last Assizes for the county of Salop, before Mr. Baron °arrow, of publishing a libel upon a gen tleman named Lamina, was mow brought up for judgment. The libel consisted of some doggrel verses, imputing to the prosecutor that he had suborned a person to commit perjury, and otherwise holding him up to ridicule. The indictment had been removed from sessions to sessions at the instance of the prosecutor. Affidavits were now put in on both sides. the defendant denied all knowledge of the author of the libel, which he swore he had copied In short-hand from a wall in the town of Bridgnorth. The COURT, after hearing Mr. Taunton and Mr. Campbell of counsel for the prosecution, and Mr. Garwood and Mr. Russell for the defendant, sentenced the defendant, in consideration of the trouble and inconvenience to which he had already been put, to pay a fine only of 51. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SATURDAY, FEB. li. DON JOIE ANTONIO D.YRISARRI V. W. J. CLEMENT, ESQ. In this ease a rule had been obtained, calling on the plaintiff to show cause why the verdict should not be set aside and a nonsuit entered, or a new trial granted, on the ground, first, that Chili was not a State ; and secondly, that the plaintiff could not recover on this libel, as he was engaged in illegally attempting to raise a loan tot a foreign country. The COURT now overruled both these objections, but mentioned a third, namely, that the meaning of the libel was not properly stated in the innuendos inserted in the decimation ; and on this ground they thought the case ought to go down to a new trial. The rule for a new trial was accordingly made absolute. CONSISTORY COURT, SATURDAY, FEB. 11. THE MOST NOBLE THE MARCHIONESS 0 WESTMEATH V. TILE MARIIIIIS OF WESTM)ATH. The arguments in this case were resumed on the sitting of the Court. Dr. Phillimore, on the part of the Marquis of Westmeath, followed Dr. Jenner, whose arguments at the same side had occu. pied the Court during the last sitting. Dr. PIIILLIMont entered at great length into the details of the evidence. He adverted particularly to those charges of cruelty and adultery against the Marquis which had not been relied upon by the Marchioness's Counsel, because they were aware that the testi mony upon which those charges were founded was corrupt, and could not be depended upon in a Court of Justice. The same wit. nesses, however, who had supported the charges which had been abandoned bemuse they were confessedly unfounded, were relied on to support those charges of cruelty upon which the Marchioness of Westmeath now came forward to demand a divorce. But could any weight be given to testimony which, when it was applied to other charges, had been demonstrated to be false? The whole mass of evi. dente adduced to support the charge of cruelty against the Marquis was of no mixed a character that he contended no Court ought to be influenced by it. The witness Sarah 111•Kermic, upon whose testimony so much depended, was clearly Identified with the persons who had been found guilty of perjury. They were proved to have been under her immediate care and surveillance, and he contended that this fact was sufficient to throw a rational suspicion upon the testimony of that witness. In short, the case abounded with fraud, perjury, and conspiracy. Many of the witnesses were sunk knee-deep in perjury, and it was impossible, under such cir cumstances, not to scrutinise the evidence which remained with great severity and caution. Charges upheld by such testimony should be examined with the most critical accuracy. One charge had been imported into the case, which, he must say, he did not think his beamed Friend (Dr. Lushington) was justified in com. menting W upon in the manner in which he had done. Lord est. meath, it seemed, had taken his daughter, a child of seven years old, under his own care, and this was held to he a monstrous act of cruelty. Ills Learned Friend said he was sorry to find that persons of high rank were base enough to countenance such conduct. Now this was stepping out of his way, stepping out of Court, and bring-' ing the Duke and Duchess of Buckingham to the bar of the Court, merely because Lady Rosa, the Marquis of Westmeath's daughter, had been removed to Avington, the Duke of Buckingham's seat, when her father thought proper, as lie was fully warranted in doing, to take his infant child under his own management. This really seemed an insufficient reason for attacking the character of the Duke and Duchess of Buckingham, and he certainly thought his Learned Friend should explain the expressions which fell him from on this subject. There was no question of law arising out of this case. Lord Westmeath appeared for the purpose of enforcing cohabitation with his wife, and there was no vestige of that description of cruelty in the case which could justify the Court in coming to any other de cision than that prayed for by Lord Westmeath. The rank of the parties had been pressed upon the Court ; but he was confident that no Immunities or indulgence would be granted to th e parties in this case which would not also be granted to parties in the middle class of life, it' they came before the Court under similar circumstances. I The Marchioness of IVestmeath, like every other married woman, had solemnly bound herself to live with her husband until death did them part, and unless she showed good grounds for breaking that contract, unless she showed that there was actual clanger of life or limb, the Court was bound to enforce the contract. It would never set FO bad a precedent as that because a woman was of high rank she may quartet wi:h her husband, and remove herself from those restraints which every other married woman was under. Be trusted the case with confidence to the Court. lie felt that the noble for whom he app ea needed only to have his CM hat rp h i : mci 40 have the caluMmous aspersions, which were neemetwelts upon him is the pmgresa of that suit, com pletely simmered; •Ile Marquis of Westmeath's conduct was dic. toted by *ver b = feelings toward, his wife. There was evi deutly a OD preettation towards her, which clearly ' evinced the kindnes s sof the Marquis's feelings. lunn:h71111:t; te h n e m e a fond and over-indulgent husband, who hadeeintydthwteramtienthotfote•Ctsuuonpuepor,ttonedilasite_ united to a person, to say the least of it, of very and one who was perpetually struggling for that dominion and'ine.t. nagemera, which, as it would have degrsded the husband, ouas t never to have been Intrusted to the wale. Under all the circu-so-., stances of the ease, he submitted that the charge of adultery u s . uslirognetteshetrimuonntyruewh,iethbacnt could d e be cha r r e g i e ied of on cris , bound to decide in favour of the hharquiaof Westmeath, soul to enforce the Marchioness to return to that cohabitation from whi ch - she had unjustifiably withdrawn herself. The arguments of the leading Counsel on behalf of the 31aro u 1. of Westmeath were given so fully in the British Press of Mend s ; last, that we have only deemed it necessary to give a brief skstrb ' the line of argument pursued by Dr. Phillimore, whose &Ideas occupied the Court for a period of nearly four hones. Dr. LUSIIIN GTO,/ rose to reply on behalf of the 111 SYCIIIOSem of Westmeath, when Sir C. ROBINSON suggested, that as the reply could not be m e , eluded this day, it might be deferred to the next Court day. 1)r. LUSHINGTON acquiesced in the suggestion that fell frets the Court. He felt, he said, that he would come to the subject more at ease on the next Court day, as Isis spirit, were 'little nat. tared by what had fallen from Dr. Philliniore. (A laugh.) POLICE. MA R 1,130 R()UGH-STR E ET. On Saturday Richard William Britt, shspmen to Mr. Themes Thwaltes, tailor and clothier of Broad-street St. Giles, Was brOU g h t before H. M. Dyer, Esq., charged with tiering robbed ha mi. ployer. Mr. Thwaites deposed that the prisoner had lived with him as $ shopman between three and four years. On Tuesday last M t . Phillips, a clothes-dealer resident in Holywelhatreet, came sal asked him if he had not been robbed ? To this question be could not give a decisive answer, as he had always a large stoc k of clothes on hand, and did all his business for ready money, on which Mr. Phillips produced a great coat and a youth's suit of doilies, which he instantly recognised to be his property ; Mr. Phillips then informed him of whom he had bought them, and also stated that he had bought previous to this two great coats and a suit of clothes, which he had sold. In consequence of this information, on Friday night he gave the prisoner into custody. The articles now pro. duced were worth about 41. 12s. Levy Abrahams deposed that the prisocer came to their shoptoms time entre, and offered two great costs and a suit of clothes for sale. Upon that occasion he represented himself to be a master tailor, and in great want of money ; he accordingly bought the article,. On Tuesday last, the prisoner came again, bringing with him a great coat and suit of clothes. He then said that they were misfits, and he asked 2/. for them. This he refused to give, and offered 305., which was taken. He then questioned him again as to where he lived, when he said in Plumtree-street. This however he knew to be false, as a young man who was in the shop had informed him that the prisoner lived with 3/v. Thwaites. He then taxed the pri. goner with the theft, which he acknowledged, fell on his knot, begging of hint to say nothing about it, and he would take the clothes back ; but this the witness refused to do, and not basing any person in his place at the time, he let the prisoner go, upon promise to come to him at twelve o'clock on the following day, which promise he did not fulfil. He did not state to the prisoner that he knew where he lived, but the information to Mr. Thwa.us the next day. 51r. Thwaites here stated that, upon taxing the prisoner, be, without his making any promise, begged of him to forgive bin, saying it was the first time he had ever been guilty of robbing tem. The prisoner, whet stood crying at the bar during the whole time, said nothing in his defence, and was fully committed to take his trial. Several publicans residing in the neighbourhood of the Seven. dials appeared before H. hl. Dyer and J. E. Conant, Essrs., to answer to the informations of Johnson, the informer, and his man. They were charged with keeping open their houses to late hours, permitting gambling and other offences. Two of the publicans proved that Johnson and his man had made some mistakes, which gave them the victory. The remainder however were not so fortu- nate, who, although they made very lengthy defences, were tined te mitigated penalties sod costs. WORSH I P-STREET. CAUTION TO LODGING•HOUSE KEEPERS.-011 Saturday a man of respectable appearance, who passed by a variety of names, was committed to Newgate for trial on three separate charges of felony, by Henry Osborne, Esq. the presiding Magistrate. It appeared from the evidence that from the month of October last to the time of the apprehension of the prisoner he has been almost daily employed in taking lodgings, for the purpose of robbing the houses. In all the instances adduced his representations and conduct were nearly the same. On seeing a lodging to let le knocked at the door and asked to see it. It suited him, and ha thought it appeared respectable. He informed the people ho was just come from Wisbeach, or from Norfolk, or sonic other con. siderable distance in the country, and he found ut the inns in London they imposed upon him, being so little acquainted with the world. He said he was a farmer, and talked about the beauties of the country being so much preferable to the smoke and dirt of the metropolis. He had business in town, and perhaps should stay only two or three days ' or it might be long er , at any rate he would take the lodging for a fortnight. On being asked for a reference, he used to say that he had no friends to refer to in London, they were a long way off, and he never thought about its being menu,/ before he started from home, and he was sure they need not be aired of him. This and similar excuses always succeeded, and he punctually came to his lodging at nine o'clock in the evening. Ths next morning, or the morning after, when he found the opportunity to go out unperceived, he generally took wearing apparel or any other valuable article in ,his own or the adjoining room, and never returned again. AfEETINGS OF CREDITORS. AT THE COURT OF COMMISSIONERS or Bartli;1711, BASINOH•LL-STEETT. THIS DAY. 11 Kirkbrlde, J. Wood -street, Chrapside, lace-merchant . 12 Marshall, J. Foster-lane, Cheapside, warehouseman . 12 Ryland, S. H. and Knight, J. Horselydown, lightermen 12 TO-MOHROw. THIRD MEETINGS. Chambers, A. IL•sen. and A. H. jun. New Bond-street, and South 51olton-street, bankers (enlarged) . It Cross. G. jun. Claremiarket, butcher . 10 Hill, U. late of Lambourn, Berke, grocer . 1 L Wardale, F. Allhalloys-lane, Thames-street, mustard.ma- nufacturer . 10 Warren, J. 51onkwell-street, bricklayer . I SECOND MEETINGS. Bray, T. Queen-street, Chelsea, carpenter - . 12 Cox, W. and T. Playhouse-yard, IChitecross-street, paper. stainers . 11 Evans, U. Lamb's Conduit -street, linen-draper . I (ledge, E. Lower Thames-street, fishmonger . 10 Jones, W. R. and G. Davis's Lower %Chaff, Southwark, w harfingers - Id . II Osbor n,Page,Leigh,ox to 12 inteeoritnlggrarodcener, silversmith it Williamson, T. W. arid Jones, E. Packer's -court, Coleman- NPV'eapßoinn.., R. GUr'ecirvsocEw-street, hosier Coleman- Street, merchants 1 FIRST MEETINGS. Barlow, J. and Doering, J. late of the New-road, Saint George's in the East, sugar-refiners 11 Boucher, R. George -stmt, Adelplai, diamond-merchant Burlett, D. L. New -street, Bishopsgate-street, merchant II .; Forster. T. Newington-causeway, builder 10 How, W. F. South Sea House, Threadneedle -street, mer- chant , 12 '' Lynn, G. Cecil-street, Strand, tailor 10 i - Spooner, W. (:hiswell-street, linen-draper Pt Strugnell, R. B. Threadneedle -street, boot-maker 10 Paul, C. Blandford•mews, Manchester-square, cabinet- maker • • 1 Pommy's, J. Freernan's.court, Cornbill, insurance-broker lo Plunkett, W. and Batkin, J. Old-street-road, timber-mer. chants • 10 Richings, T. late of Howard -stmt, but now of Thavies. Inn, scrivener and broker 11 Rogers, D. Upper North-place, Gray's lon-road, grocer 12 DIVIDENDS. Bentley J. and Beck, J. Curnhill, watch•makers Blundell. hi. and B. Holborn-bridge, wholesale drapers 12 Bryan, W. Camberwell, merchant 12 Greig, W. City rued, upholsterer . 12 Norton, D. S. Uxbridge, brewer Id NVestron, M. Wellington, Somerset, draper lu BI HT H. On the 3d inst. at Campeall Park, near Doncaster, the lady is Sir Joseph Radcliffe, Bart. of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 7th host. at St. John's Church. Hampstead. the Rev. Samuel Carr, 11. A. Fellow of Queen's College, Cambridge. Recto - and Vicar of Great and Little Eversden, anti Perpetual Curate is St. bitty- Key, Ipswich, to Martha Diana, relict of the late Chatha Buxton, jun. Esq. of North End, Hampstead. - DIED. On the 4th inst. in the 79th year of her age, Mrs. Mary Coe, re- • i lict of the late Mr. T. H. Coe, of Royston, Herta. On Thursday week, after a lingering illness, in the 73th year of his age; Charles Gregory Wade, ,Esq many years an active Ma- gistrate for the borough and county of * Warwick. On the 6th instant, at her house in Chepstow. respected and esteemed by all who knew her, Miss Bowsher. We hear she has left many charitable bequests, including 1061. to the Bath Has pital, and the like sum to the Bristol Infirmary. On the 2d inst. at the York Hotel, Dover, where he had resided a considerable time, Lieutenant-Col o n e l S cott, late of the Royal Artillery. On Alonday last, at his spsetesesit is Neetisghess, Lieutenant- Colooel William Shaw, of she heif.psy. He weed his Dirtiest/ for sixty.two years. At the pastures, newt Devby, on the 31st ult. Bache Hsatbcote, Esq., one of the tneghtestes foeHerbyebiee, raged 66. ___-- - - - • Printed at THE BRITISH PRZOSOIIIa, by J. W. Gm itLe o Pr, 181, Strand, and published by R. Chives, seism phew • Samuel and St.