The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-07-21 00:00:00

RI R tiii period , years, and alway s considered an honest man. Mr. Justice LITTLEDALE charged the Jury, who found the primers Jeffries and Smith guilty of stealing, and Damage of re ceiving the horse, knowing it to be stolen. Leel Burton and Belcher Dicke were indicted for feloniously a:enting a bay mare, the property of Humphrey Gifford, at Nonh Cadbury. in Somersetshire, on the Ist of July, and a mare pony, the property of Jamie Parsons, at South Cadbury, Somerset, on Oa same day. Humphrey Oifford—T reside at North Cadbury, in the county of Somerset, and am the owner of the bay mare which forms the subject of the indictment. I missed the mare on Friday the Ist of July, and nest maw her In the care of the hostler at the George Inn, county. I have observed him pass bout fire o'clock. I were mounted ; Ay. I suspected where I called on • We came up concealed be. frost them, feed. prisoners disowned all caught, and taken to • horses was a bay • were two great 'Then I saw the gave the horse*, overtook the pd.! ice where we over. which latter is Hl custody. Stoke, In this county. Nine.nsile IVater, • andy!isosers in caaj. ,ymieslury, ih the town to. t in the morn. the prisoners, the same I had where, about nine the prisoners, • a bay mare. it would work Burton asked N. or 'ince seen the homes with the prisoners. prisoners at the bar. George. I took the black lessyeled boy mare into my charge on the let of this month, and wilhe them op to Parsons and !Afford, the owners, en the Mon - 4th instant. Pamone—l received a black pony which had been stolen Me me en the 3f)th June, at South Cadbury, from the last witness, ell Sheath of this mouth. rik ZJury found Levi Berton Guilty, and Belcher Bioko Not 10. Justice Yuri% AAAAA informed the orisoner Burton that Isis Bib would'', spared, het be wield be seat oat of the country. *At the petioles were well known as deniers and sellers of homes fn this aunty, although eztremely young men. They are remiffkable for opeceliarity of countenance and complexion, which seduced the Coined for the prosecution to think they . were gipsies. lilertnn's oomplettion is almost Moorish in point of hue, and his tenure" of a east decidedly Jewish. dillfolser Dirk: was again put on his trial. charged with having . "Wald i black mme pony, the property of Mr. Thocru Parsoos, at 11:441eird., y, Somerset, nn the lit July. - is became neeesaary, os the Jury in the last case acquitted sise ' , entertaining a doubt on the subject of the evilen‘e = s us inealpate Oaks is the ro bbery of tie bay ;mare in the indictment-I *wore sae then me WNW she proof of the loss of the pony, of Se Mine seen isthe promotes. peerosalon, sod hie subsequent 44411teheasiOn, being precisely the lame as that &dimwit in the - Last mv ii = tl seesaory to /era it* Julgtnest of Death was sweetie& but his Lord►hip gain him hopes of obtaining a commutation of the sentence. SHEEP STEALING. James White wee indicted for stealing a sheep at Berwick St John, in this county, the property of Mr. King. It appeared in evidence that on Sonday, the 10th of JelYt sheep from the dock of the prosecutor was found mining. A track was discovered near the fold, which led in the direction of th e prisoner's doer, in whose house a quantity of the meat wu found, and the skin and other parts of the sheep in a well near the door, which were all identified as belonging to the prosecutor.— Guilty. MA NSLAUG El T E ft. Martha Francis was indicted for manslaughter, on the body of her husband, John Francis, at Trowbridge, in this county, on the 7th of May. John A xford—.l am a weaver, living at Trowbridge. I recollect the morning of the Bth May. At about half-past four, 1 lookod out of my window, and saw a man lying apparently dead, near the Privy. I then made an alarm, and on the neighbours coming up, I attempted to raise the body, and finding the man expiring, I went I to proenre a surgeon, but when 1 returned, the body bad en re- moven and carried to the Church. John Foley—l am a constable, at Trowbridge. I found the body of Francis, the deceased, en the morning of the Bth May, in ' the yard of the last witness. There were marks of bruises, arid ' much blond about the body. I conveyed it to the Church. The night before. I saw deceased and prisoner at the bar, at about 11 o'clock, in Black -street, Trowbridge. I saw prisoner knock the deceased down. We thought it merely a trial between a man and his wife, which was so usual in our town, that wthought nothing about it. (A laugh.) I saw prisoner knock her husband down again, and he fell heavily. She lifted him up. and they went to wards a public-house. Seeing the deceased look very bad, we took I prisoner into custody. The deceased followed us a little way, and appeared very weak. James Jones-1 wu a waiter, at the King of Prussia public house, In Trowbridge, In May last. Prisoner and the deceased came into the house, on the 7th May, where they drink and quar relled ; they left the house about 10 o'clock. John Nanny.—.l saw the prisoner and (teemed on the night of the 7tit of May, about half-past ten ; they were quarrelling. Pri sonet:a.nocked the deceased down by w blow on the left side of the head, and when down kicked him with her feet about the head re ' peatedly. She then raised him up, and they proceeded, prisoner continuing to abuse the deceased. Jacob Watson.—! saw deceased and the prisoner about half-past ten on the night of the 7th of May, near the bridge. Prisoner knocked the deceased down, and blood flowed from his face. Mary Browne.—l saw the prisoner abuse and knock the deceased down on the night of the 7th of May, at ball-put ten John Applegate, • constable at Trowbridge, described the oc currences between prisoner and the deceased in the same manner as the preceding witnesses. Mr. Thomas Sylvester.—l am • surgeon at Trowbridge. I opened the head of the deceased on Monday, the 9th of May. I found two small wounds on the back of the head, and others over the sight eye. There was • very considerable wound on the fore head over the left eye. The occipital bone was tractured, and an extravasation of blood on the brain corresponding with the fracture. There were several bruise. over various puts of the face. The in juries sustained on the head were sufficient to•occasion death, but no single one of them would have done so. lam of opinion they thd altogether occasion the death of the deceased. Prisoner, being called on for Jur defence„ said site had never struck her husband except with the palms of her hands, and that I his death was caused by his not having been taken proper care of, but allowed to wander about in a state of intoxication, when he fell from a wall, which occasioned his death. 31r. Justice LITT LEDALE charged the Jury, who returned verdict of Gui/ty. 111 r. Justice LITT LEDALE, in pronouncing sentence. said, that the prisoner had been convicted on very satisfactory evidence of the crime laid to her charge, but as the Court was not disposed to con sider she had intended the melancholy consequences that ensued from her act. its sentence would be a very light one. His Lord ship then sentenced the prisoner to be fined one shilling, and con fined in the county gaol foe the space of two calendar month,. illaselfilleat the evidence of Mirry Bee& (the last witness), which IS Wignesdict the statement of the prosecutOr in regard to the • having been near the pla7e where the robbery had been • ,on the 2ilth of October. Mrs. Been swore with great bete fact of die prisonet's being at Rochester on the if October, dad if be it would have been scarcely practicable Valdes to have committed the robbery laid to his charge. Besides, tektite might 'have been mistaken on this point. It had, how- (ve t been proved that the mare was sullen, and sold to Kellow by' Boner. ' It was. far the Jury to consider (supposing they ac- + nits of the capital part of the indictment) whether or not: neletinar had received the mare, knowing it to have been stolen. lotrieder stood indicted with both 'offences, and the Jury would soap ell the eircummances of the,case say if any or either of them Mod bees satisfactorily proved agairmt him. The Jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty. Joeite4 Trilet and Robert Jefriet were put to the bar, indicted leniously stealing a brown gelding, the 'property of James at Salisbury, on the 7th of November ; and Ifilliem rge was indicted for feloniously receiving the same, knowing it Efk rbff whew* been stodge. Me. Lawctie.Ow stated the cue to the Jury, and called for the peesecut ion. 111. Janes Bostserry'l live at 3131rttesbury, in Oxfordshire, am a farmer. I lost a dark brown gelding on the night of the October ; I saw it on the 2fith In my stable ; it was turned X told in the perish of slalmabury on that day. I next saw it ' • t the middle of May at Vauxhall, in the possession of Mr. ie.' • . t e C o rt Ini aw— eg ilyalmsbu n r d y o i n s neeStowe-in-the-told; - and is . • LincK 'Alike-A live at Vauxhall, and am a corn.dealer kqeper. I bought the horse sten in my possession by tho t witness from Stedman and Ramage on the 19th November Om; I bought the hofse for 20!. and paid 18/. down ; the other 21. We to be paid If the horse tornml out sound. Stedman signed the, ' Isesipt,"but I can't say which of them took the money. Thome Stedman—iThis witness was the accomplice in the rob- beryand was brought up in custody of Hall, the officer, of Union.' bell Police-office.}-1 am a labourer, and live at Banning, near; Maidstone. 1 know the prisoners at the bar, and saw them all shone in this town on the 7th of November last. On that occasion pegs and I bought three horses from the other two prisoners; ' eke was a brown gelding, another a dun gelding, and the third a, Etrto2•l• ; we gave ten pounds for the brown gelding, and ten 1 ds for the other two. - Smith and Jeffries told me the name of plate from Which the brown gelding came but I do not read- *tit. It was about twenty.fire miles from Berwick-hill. They It was got on the morning of Berwick - hill fair, which was on ' orb November. I think the value of the brown gelding was' I$L Bassage and I had been in the habit of buying horses tine. I don't know whether Swage was acquainted with toed Jeffries before, but I understood he had seen at Portadown fair in July. Bassage and I took the • tektite' to Rome y fair, and not selling it there, to Ime4on, and sold It to White on the 19th November for our way to London, Besiege talked of selling the gelding seas at Maidstone. Baasage rode It from Ramsey fair to W 44 2:14 d rede a it from r thitt w t . o l L: t n o t3f i l iin l:n it fil t e n n t b h e i . W 'Baiiage. Smith Jeffries were there. g When there *Ole present but ourselves, Bassage laid down 201. In country . *clay for the three horses. We were at the King's Head *Ole the entire of the day. It was dusk when we took the horses TIOOI • field in the neighbourhood of this city in which they placed. .cgoes.examined.—When I am at home I live at Ilarming, but I *Mae hers from London. I bare been living there since the 10th illibeitary. I took up my quartert in Horsemonger-lane ; it was in there,: a man, named Davis, was there too, and he was trans- ported, but not for horse stealing, it was only for stealing harness. (A laugh.) I had been previously acquainted with Davis, and mitt Wei u fairs and market-pleas, but did not join his company till we met at Berwick-hill fah . Davis Merit at the King's Head, arid we were al in this town together. This is the first time I made my appearance in a court of justice-1 mean in this way.-- (in the witness-box), but I was. in ore in that way (at the bar). t Loathing.) It is not a good joke to be at the bar, at least not that know of. (A laugh.) I was tried for horse-stealieg, but I wet quite innoceht. I have been charged with passing bad notes, W 1 -never knew nothing about them. (Laughter.) I know a named Jacobs, who was accused of uttering forged notes at ton, and I was taken up Oft his account, not on my own. (A ) I was never taken op at Maidstone for nothing, ( laughter,) Ye) nor tot something, (a laugh,) except for beating a man. I was not charged there with having passed bail notes, and never ran away from Maidstone except once. By the COU RT.-4 knew the horse was stolen. Smith said he node ft away from Stowe-in-the-11'0d fair. Ile said he had it about &fortnight in his possession ; that was aIL I was not taken up for steeling this horse. I had been eight or nine weeks in custody before I made any disclosure. I don't know whether I will be pardoned or not, in consequence of the evidence I am now giving; net I expect it. iter-examtned.—l have been tried for horse-stealing, but not con- I was never tried for passing bad notes. Smith told me and • he had ridden away the brown horse from Stowe.in. vietek ams UM. lid uring fair time. 'WaThon Bayley.-1 live at Milford, near Salisbury, and am a dairy-Span and farmer. On a Sunday evening in the beginning of Ithewiember hut, I saw some men in my field. There were horses am field on Sunday morning. The men I saw were Jeffries and ' There were two more, hut I did not know them. I can wig was one of them. The men came and took the horses paying a shilling for the keep. They talked of going t wfwes to fair. Doseding.-1 keep a public-house al Fisherton. I kept the 's Head in Salisbury on the 7th November. On that day erwei lixon 1 gam Stan, Jellies* and Stedman at my house. I don't know that they drank tqgether, They were all in one room, and several odiekirtaiside. I can't swear the prisoner Bas age was there, but Mthate been. amined.--it was the common room, and whoever pleas- ed=haess gone into it. Hall.--(the officer examined on the last triaL)—l Teeny. al abligsrn gelding from Mr. Whitt, of Vauxhall, on the 15th Map Botherry claimed the horse as his property ; add I deli. ,reed it to him at Union Hall, The ease for the prosecution being closed, and the prisoners rialwit called on for their defence, Smith and Jeffries denied all know. ledmi of the transaction. Bemis said it was Stedman sold the horse. and that he had • nothing is do with It farther than recommending Mr. White to purchase the horse from him. Arr. White was called to give evidence in behalf of Bassage's citarecter, whom he sta.ed that he knew for a period of several Aymenbury, on the dth. Jams Eolliett—l live at East Knoyle, in this cow frequently men Burton at fairs and markets. I oilmen my tome on the let July,,early In the morning, about Decks, the other prisoner, was with him, and both we Bekaa on a hay mare, and Dicks on a black pony. thorn, and pursued them on horseback to Stoke, whet K Mr. eno,. who accompanied me in the pursuit. with Prisoners at Nine-mile Water. Prisoners were e hind some hashes, and the hones about 30 yards from inn(( unsaddled, and without bridles. The prisoners rtairiedge of the horses. The horses were caught, 1 24 ge. lon at Aymesbury. One of the horn .1:1 the other a black pony. Near the horses w aid!, a saddle, two bridles, and two horse cloths. Wt primers Seat they had light eoloured coats on. Ige Iri drove to the hostler at the George Inn. IVe over 40611 aliUut twelve or one in the day. The place wi *nit is about 25 miles front East Knoyle, whirl Worn Cadbury. We took the two men into costa ' eet Kellsm—l reside at Winrcrhurn, Stoke, in I 'partied the last wittiest to a place called Nine. tailialisbory Plain. where I found the two homes anti fiernesinner described by hint. 1 saw only toe great c 'Set Itilerthilit—T am a eohitable, residing et Ay seirCcounty, and saw the prisoners riding through t wattda Nile-nails Water, on the let July, about nine tag. The homes they rode were jaded. I nest saw t in custody at Bulford with the homes, which were th with them about three hours before. Berge Dyerz-I live at Winterbum Stoke, where, o'clock in the morning of the Ist of this month, I saw I BMmounted on • black pony, and Burton on sabred me the pony for sale, and Burton said it it Ihisess, in answer to a question from me. Burton faittews. and I refused to purchase it. I have since se es risherton, and they are the same as I saw with I The men who offered the pony for RI le are tb s prison Alin Rooks--1 am hostler at the George. I toe - OXFORD CIRCUIT. WORCESTERSHIRE ASSIZES, WOIC/ISTZI9, JULY 19. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. .HAYWARD i 94. As soon as this ease was called on Mr. JEw yrs rose and stated, ' that he was most happy to inform them that the defendant had on this occasion shown himself a man of honour, and had consented that a verdict should pass against him for 1,000/. it being also agreed that a marriage should be had between the parties within a month. _ ..... . The learned BARON hoped that he might, without detracting from the dignity of the station that he had the honour of tilling, express his entire.approbatiun of the way in which the cue had ter. minated. He considered that it did credit to both parties and it would give him great pleasure, on some future Circuit, to be in. formed that the union had taken place, and that the panics were living happily together. SPENCER V. BATEMAN. This was an action for an assault. Mr. Jena ts and Mr. etritWOOD conducted the plaintiff's cue, and Mr. Russzt t. the defendant's. _ It appeared that both parties were farmers, and that some angry i expressions passed between them at the Crown Inn at Upton. The' plaintiff called the defendant a liar, and he gave him a pair of black eyes tor so doing; and for this the Jury found--a farthing damages. CROWN SIDE. Before Mr. Justice Bviiaottorr. lIORSE-STEAIANG BY WOMEN. Feeley Dalton. aged SO, and Elizabeth Dation, her daughter, aged 20. were indicted for stealing a horse, value 101. the property of James Smith. The younger prisoner was a very interesting looking girl. Mr. 00DiON conducted the prosecution. James Smith said—l am a shoemaker at Tenbury, and keep a pony ; and on the 11th of June I saw my pony safe; that was at about six o'clock ; the pony was then on a common; it was a dark pony with a white spot on the left ear. I missed it the following morning, and sent to liromyard in pursuit, and I met Parnel Davis, and proceeded to Mathern and to Malvern, where I found my pony; I have known the elder prisoner about twenty-five years; the primers live any where; they travel about, but follow no business; they beg. ' Parnell Davis said—l live at Thurnbury, and saw the two pri sonets the day after the horse was lost, at about four o'clock in the morning; I had seen them travelling about before; they had with I them a dark brown pony ; the daughter was riding on it. Joseph Jones, a constable, said. I received some information from the prosecutor, and found the elder prisoner at Severnstoke. I asked what she had done with the pony. She said, she had sold ft to a man on the side of Malvern hill, for 41. She took me to her daughter who was at Upton. I asked the daughter where the pony was, and she said it had been sold to Robert Smith, Ind after that, the elder prisoner pointed it out to me in an orchard. I then I took the two women and the pony to the Unicorn Inn, at Malvern, where the prosecutor owned the pony. Robert Smith said, I know the prisoners. I saw them on the' , 13th of June with the pony. I asked them to sell it, and the elder one said her daughter should sell it, and the daughter said the price was 41. I wanted her to take but she said they would not take less than they gave for it, and I paid them the 41. Examined by the Learned JUDGE-4 had not a very good bar gain. I would not have given more for it, though it might . hare been worth 101. I did not think they had stolen it. They have had horses befete. . _ The elder prisoner said nothing in her defence. The younger one said, that her mother left her for some hours, and came back with the pony. Mr. Justice BuRROUG it summed up the evidence. Verdict—Guilty. Juigment of death was recorded against them. The prisoners had been tried about a year ago for stealing a colt. PRIZE FIGHTING ANY) ASSAULTING A MAGIS TRATE. James Rillineam, George S.ivare, and William Skinner, were indicted fur a riot, and an assault on Daniel Rogers, Esq., a Ma gistrate. Mr. Rraw, in the absence of Mr. Rumen, stated that informs. tion had been received that the defendants. Billinghain and Sa mew owns mftghta piaeled battle • somewhere near itmurbridge, and 31r. Biggs, a Magistrate, sent word to them not to tight ;but to avoid any interruption they arranged to fight near Bayley, where they prepared a ring, but the Rector of Bayley applied to Mr. Rogers, the prosecutor, to stop the fight. Previous to that the headborough and overseer of Harley had gone to prevent the din. tusbance, but without eft'ect. Mr. Rogers then came up, he went into the ring, and having stated that he was a Magistrate, he told , them they must not fight, but the defendant, Skinner, being very I violent, Mr. Rogers seized him and a scuffle ensued, in which 31r. Rogers was thrown down; the mob then gave a loud cheer, and all departed. William Miektewright said, I am hcadborough of the town of Stourbridge. On the 4th of this present month, I received an order from Mr. Biggs, a Magistrate, to put a stop to a fight that was to take place on Pe ley Common. I went to the house of the; father of the defendant Bellingham. I saw that defendand and a; person named Benjamin itt'assel and others. I told the defendant that if they did tight, they would be taken up. Mr. Juetice-Braaounfi—On the neat occasion, you ought to take combatants into caustody, and bring them to a Magistrate at once. Examination resnrned—He said, I don't think I shall go there. 1 then went to the defendant Savage, but he was not at home, and I waited for him till he came in when I told him (for I had under. stood that he was one of dm " hopponents" that was to fight) that if he went on with the battle, he would be taken up, and he said ve well. ' then went to the common, but found no one there. Joseph Jackson said—l ant assistant overseer to Bayley. I went to Broad Marsh green, and on my arrival there I saw a large'concoursc of people assem bled. I should think above 1000 they were pimple of all descriptions. A ring was formed, and Savage and Bellingham threw up their hats. 'Emile Into the ring, and Savage was sitting on the right of the ring. Billinghttm on the left: they were striped, anti each was attended by his second. I said, " Gentlemen, Meet is to be no fight hers to-day." The mob in.' aimed there sticns!d be a fight. I theb rode•dit'to Gillingham and Savage, and told them not to fight. I was then ordered out of, the ring, and mired 'why I caw, there? I said I came by the, authority of Mr. Higgs, the Magistrate. A person then exclaimed they did not care for Mr. Biggs, nor all the Alagistrates in the county. Warley Wessel Came up, and asked me for my warrant. I went away, across the green, and met Mr. Rogers, Aba Bagistrave, and Ms. l'arner, the Rector of Bayley, and 1 returned with awn to the ring. Mr. 1t get [ WaS On foot, Mr. Turner and myself on horseback. Mr. Rogers is well known as a Magistrate; he went into the ring, and then told them to be peaceable, and to disperse, saying lie was a Magistrate, and I, by his order, did the fame. A cry was raised, ' Do let them tight, it won't last long !" I then saw Skinner; he appeared busy, and wished them to fight; he hit my horse when Imeke to him, and soon after I saw Mr. Rogers and Skinner seußlMg I herd Mr. Rogers tell Briscoe to sestet in taking Skinner, and there was much scuffling with the mob to get Skinner away from Mr, Ro gers, but I could not observe much, as the mob continued hitting me and my horse with their sticks. By this time the ring was broken in upon ; all was confusion, and Skinner got away. On this the mob shouted and went away. I saw Mr. - Rogers on the ground, and Briscoe thrown on him. In the confusion. at one time I saw nearly fifty persons thrown down on the ground 4 I re. ceived a heavy blow on the arm, which injured me a good deal._ Mr. Rogers lost one of his shoes, which was carried away by the mob. William Briscoe, a constable of Hayley. said, I went to Broad Marsh-green ; 1 saw Mr. Rogers there. I heard him order seve ral people off, and say he was a Magistrate; they would not go. I saw Mr. Rogers seise Skinner, because he would not go away when he ordered him. Skinner said why don't you let them fight;" we tried to take Skinner away, but he said he would not be taken away by any one, and Mr. Rogers and me were both pushed down. Daniel Rogers, Esq. said, I am a Magistrate, residing near Hayley ; I remember the day in question. I was applied to by Mr. Turner, and went wish him to Broad Marsh Common. I went into the ring, and telling them I was a Magistrate I ordered them to disperse. They would not do so, and I asked the more decent part of the persons present to assist me in dispersing the rest, but they refused to do so. I in particular asked Skinner to assist me; he peremptorily refused t I then told him to go, and that he would not do, and I collared him ; but he said he would not be taken. A shout was then setup, and a rush was made at us, and myself and a great many more were thrown down ; I re. ceived no blow, nor do I think any was aimed at me. The mob gave another still louder shout and departed ; I did not see the other defendants do any thing. The defendant Billingharn said that when he was told in the ring that they must not tight, he put* his cites again and went away. Mr. Justice BOnftiatton—By laW, what is done in such en assembly by one, all present me squally liable fir, which ought to make persons very careful. The defendant Savage said nearly the same as Billingham. Skinner said be was Innocent. Mr. Justice anew:at:ow, in his charge to the Jury, said, that it could not be Mpoted that all these fights were illegal, and no coeseat could make them legal, and all the county - b6ng there could not make them less an offence. They were unlawful assemblies, and everyone going to them was guilty of an offence. ' The inconvenience in the country was not so great. but nearer Lon don the quantity of crime these tights led to was immense, and he did hope they would be put a stop to ; and his advice to the magis trates and constables was, in cases where they had information of a fight, to secure the combatants beforehand and take them to a ma gistrate, and compel them to enter in securities to keep the peace till the next Assizes or Sessions, and if they would not enter into such security to commit them to prison. In this way the fights would be Stopped, for if there were no combatants there would be no tights. But in many cases near London where this had not been done, the party went along the banks of the Thames, and if the Magistrates prevented the fight in one county, they crossed the river and got into another, where, though some of the fights were prevented, others on the contrary were not.—(His Lordship then took a full review of the facts of the present ea se.)—ln the ease be fore them there was the fullest proof, and in those eases of riot all the parties were equally liable to prosecution whether they actually struck blows or not, all present being in law equally guilty. The Jury, after a few minutes' deliberation, found the defendants Guilty. Mr. Justice Butotorost said, the Magistrates have all along behaved with the greatest propriety ; they do not press fora severe sentence—all that is wanted is, that these assemblies should in stopped ; and, if I could be sure that your own solemn engagement would bind you not to get into these outrages again, I should be disnoted to pass a slight sentence on you. (The defendants protested that they would never join a fight again.) I therefore shall only adjudge that you be imprisoned for one calendar month, and that you enter into your own recognizance in 1001., to be of good behaviour for one year ; and you ought to be very grateful to the prosecutors for the mild way in which they have treated the case. George initecroft, alias Whealcrofl, alias Jupan, was charged with marrying Sarah Archer, his former wife, Ann Whitecroft, being still alive. He pleaded Guilty. This case concluded the Worcester Aerates. The Commission will be opened at Stafford on Thursday afternoon. MIDLAND CIRCUIT. LINCOLNSHIRE ASSIZES, Liwcomr, JOLT 19. CIVIL SIDE. Before Mr. Justice PARE. SMITH AND ANOTHER V. TROLLOPS, BART. This was an action of tro►er, brought against the Sheriff of this county, to recover bark the goods of the plaintiff seized under a warrant from the Sheriff, by virtu of a judgment against a Mr. Cobb. 111 r. Sergeant VAUGHAN stage the case to the Jury. The plaintiffs were general shopkaiptes In Lowth, and had furnished Mr. Cobb with a quantity of goods upon the terms of agency, the eight of property still remaining in them. There was an agree ment between the plaintiff's and Cobb, that the goods should be furnished to the latter at cost prices, and that he should be allowed 5 per cent. commission upon the sale, the plaintiffs reserving the right of entering upon his premises, to take away any part of the goods they should think proper. Mr. Cobb became surety to a Mr. Chapman, for a debt due to him by a relation of Cobb's, and which not being paid by the principal, an execution was issued by Chapman against Mr. Cobb, the surety. In consequence of this and other unfortunate circumstances, Mr. Cobb's affairs became embarrassed, and he determined to move from the neigh bourhood in which he was then living; he informed the plaintiffs of his intention, who by virtue of the agreement took possession of the goods, but they were subsequently seized by the de.' fendant, at the suit of Mr. Chapman, and sold. The present' action was therefore brought against the Sheriff, who had been in. demnilied by Mr. Chapman, who was, in fact, the real defendant in the cause. Several witnesses were then examined, who proved the facts stated by the learned Sergeant. Mr. CLARICE. sen. for the defence, contended that the agree ment was fraudulent upon the face of it, because it gave a prefer ence to the plaintiffs against the other creditors of Cobb. The circumstances attending the entire transaction indicated fraud, and therefore deprived the plaintiffs of the right to recover in this action. The Learned JUDGE, in summing up, said he should take the opinion of the Jury 10 to whether the circumstances amounted to a fraud or not. With regard to the validity of the agreement itself, that was a question which he should reserve for the consideration of the Court or Common Pleas. The Jury returned a verdict generally for the defendant. CROWN SIDE. Before Mr. Justice HOLROYD. - 117 m. floderow, aged twenty, was capitally indicted for stealing on the 3d of May last, from a pasture-close, In the parish of Misson, three young heifers and one young steer, the property of Mr. Adam Bird, of West Stockwith, in the county of Nottingham, surgeon. It appeared by the evidence of the prosecutor, and of his son, that the cattle in question were on the prosecutor's farm in the afternoon of the 3d of May, and that on the sth they were missing. They had no intelligence of them until the 10th, when they heard that the prisoner had sold three heifers and a steer to a farmer, by the name of Thomas lloldsworth ; they went to this person's hause, and identified them as the cattle they had lost. Boldsworth meted that the prisoner was a dealer in pigs; that he called on him one morning in May last, and said he had three heifers and a steer to sell ; that lie had bought them at Oainaborough fair for 16/. 12s. and would sell them again at that sum. Holdsworth purchased them, and at erwards sold them toil cattle dealer named Thorpe. The other( evidence went to Iraq *a cattle from the partaker MINOR; Oddill NM *triads Lincoln, driven by the pri soner. Several witnesses were called to speak to the character of the prisoner, who, up to this offence. had been an honest young man. Ilia LoansitlP summed up the evidence, remarking upon the improbability that the prisoner would have sold the cattle for the same money that he had given for them, supposing he had bought them as it was alleged; but it was rather a suspicious circum stance that the prison who it was said had sold them to him, was not called as a witness on his behalf. The Jury immediately found the prisoner Guilty. James Mutky, an old man, was capitally indicted on suspicion of having feloniously slaughtered a sheep, and stealing the carcass the.eof, the property of Charles Green of Kirtnn, grazier, ' Ezekiel Wood examined.—l was shepherd to Mr. Green in April last: I counted the sheep on the Sunday night, the 10th of that month, and there were forty. I went to the close about half-put five on the following morning, anti I missed one of them. I searched in t'te field for the sheep, and I found in a ditch, on the side of the field, a sheep skin ; I then went and told my master, and I afterwards took the akin to my father's barn. The constable then took possession of it. Charles Green examined—l went to my close on the 11th April last, and fount] the akin in the ditch. It appeared to be the skin of a sheep recently alsoghtered. My mark was on it. I discovered that one of my sheep was lost, and I then went to the house of [sue Newton Wilcock (the prisoner who yesterday pleaded guilty), in the company of the constable. The prisoner Motley is Wil cock's father-in-law. On searching Wilcock's haute we found a great quantity of mutton in a pipkin pot ; perhaps halt a sheep cut up in pieces. We took possession of it. We then went before the Magistrate, and the mutton was applied to the skin, anti they cor responded so as to satisfy me that the meat and the skin belonged to the same sheep. Thomas Knight, the constable, proved that the skin and meat were shown to Alanby, a butcher, at Boston. 31anby was then examined, who stated that he compared the skin and meat, and be was satisfied they belonged to the same sheep. Rebecca, the wife of Isaac Newton Wilcock, examined—l live at Frampton, near Kirton. I remember the prisoner comings° our house on the morning of the 10th of April. lie remained in the house all day. He went out about ten o'clock at night, and re turned about twelve. 1 saw bimbo hit return. Me immolate the . ...- _ 'Man where I slept, and limelight Scene mutton with Mm ; he ant up, and put part of it into a beeket, and took it to his own house. The remainder was left in our house, and was taken away by the constable on the Tuesday morning. The prisoner said he had nothing to ask of the witness, who was his own daughter. He was innocent of what was laid against him. ' He knew her husband had persuaded her to say what she had said. If she would swear his lite away he could not help it ; he was in. nocent. The witness was a wretched-looking woman, overwhelmed with grief, and beating in her arms an infant not more than five week; old. The Learned Junce said something in an undertone to Mr. Balguy, who was Counsel for the prosecution, which we suppose regarded the competency of this woman's evidence ; but it was fin. possible to catch one word of hie Lordship's observation. The witness was re-examined—My husband went out with this man, and returned with him. His LORDSHIP, in summing up, observed that as the other pri soner, Wilcock, hart confessed his guilt, the testimony of his wife did not affect him, and was therefore admissible against the one now at the bar. The Jury, after a few minutes' consultation, found the prisoner Guilty. Frances Cole , aged 59, was indicted for feloniously receiving various stolen goods of one John Smith. The indictment set out die trial and conviction of the said Smith at the last General Quarter Sessions for the liberty of Peter. borough, for having stolen the said goods, and that the prisoner had received the sante from him, knowing them to be stolen. The Clerk of the Peace for Peterborough produced the record of Smith's conviction. The record was contained in a book, in which wan entered a minute of the proceedings at the Quarter Sessions. Mr. Hite., Counsel for the defendant, objected to this as not being a proper record. It was only the materials fora record, but not a record itself. The indictmenr set out the caption of the record, and it ought to be produced. 111 r. Ir. L. NVittIAME said that was mere matter of inducement. His LORDSHIP—Yes, but it is that which makes the present charge a capital felony. I think this is not a record. If you can show me that such a minute has ever been received by other Judges, I will proceed, and reserve the poiot for you. There is a case in Sir Wm. Blackstooe's Reports, which 1 know bears upon this I question. The witness was asked what was the usual course of recording the proceedings at the Sessions for Peterborough. \Vitness—This is the only mode observed at that place, and has been so immemorially. His LORDSHIP observed, that the book did not set out the pre. sentment by the Grand Jury, and could not therefore be considered a record. He knew that when he was at the bar, it was not usual to make up these records, but he always advised the parties to do so, wherever the prober per reeoeduut was stated in indictment. Mr. llitt submitted, that as the indictment did not set out the judgment of the Court on the former indictment the present charge could not be sustained. Mr. \Victuals said, that in the case of the King v. Baldwin, it was held not to be necessary to state that the prisoner was at tainted, it was enough to show that he was convicted. His LORDSHIP referred to Hyman's case in Blackstone's Re ports, where this point was reserved for the Twelve Judges, who were all of opinion, that the indictment, if it set oat that the person was convicted, was good, although it did not state that he was attainted. Mr. WILLIAMS said, if his Lordship had any doubt upon the subject, he would not pursue the charge any further. His LORDSHIP—At present, I certainly do entertain a doubt; but if the evidence is receivable, the prosecution ought not to be stay.el. I have sent to my Bro ther Park, who, perhaps, may re. members case of the kind. _ - ..... Mr. Hitt then objected that the bill was endorsed as a true bill against Francis Cole, and not Frances Cole. The Court overruled this objection. James Ogden was then examined—l reside at Glinton, in the liberty of Peterborough. My house was broken open on the 211th of January last. A note from Mr. Justice Park was here handed to the Learned Judge, who said his Learned Brother was of the same opinion with himself, that this was not a record. The prisoner wax consequently Acquitted. Edward Laythorpe was capitally indicted for assaulting on the I King's highway Patrick Myecua. and forcibly taking from his person fifteen shillings and three halfpence, and one calico shirt. Patrick Myecua examined.-1 am an Irishman, and am em. ployed as a labourer at Tixover, in the county of Rutland. On the morning of the 20th of June I was going from Tixover to Stamford, which are about six miles apart. I was at Stamford be. tween 10 and 11 in the morning. I went to the Old Salutation public-house, and remained there in company with a man named Banks, who came from Boston to meet me there. I left the pub lic-house to return to Tixover, about eleven o'clock at night. I had 15s. and three half-pence in my pocket. When I came to Tyxwell somebody knocked me down. There were two men pre sent at the time, but I was only struck by one of them. One was dressed in regimentals, and he it was who knocked me down. The other picked my pocket. Ile took all the money I had. The ether man fixed his knees in my breast, and held me down by my neck.handkerchief. The man who took my money ran away. My hat fell oft' my head ; a shirt was in it, which the soldier took, but left the hat. I gave 3s. for the shirt ; when I got up the soldier knocked me down again. Ile had no Waterloo medal on him. The tnan then left me, and I followed them back to Stamford. It was too dark for me to be able to swear to their countenances,nor do I think I can identify the shirt. S. Thompson examined—l am the landlord of the Old &dots lion at Stamford. The prisoner, and a man named Hickman, both belonging to the South Lincoln Militia, were quartered at my house. They were both there on the evening of the 20th of Jane last. They changed their dress about tea minutes before they went out together, which was about twenty-eight minutes past ten.— 51yecua, when he paid me for some ale, showed me two half- crowns. The two soldiers were then sitting near him. They left the house a few minutes before Myecua. I had suspicions of their intentions, and followed 31yecua, but lost sight of the soldiers.— They returned at tire in the morning. Jonathan M'Duwell examined.-1 am a corporal in the South' Lincoln Militia. About four o'clock on the morning of the 21st June, I met the pilsoner and Hickman by the Corn Market, oppo site llr. Reed's, the Chief Constable. They said they had been taking a walk. They were both in regimentals, but without side-armx. Edward Peasegood examined.—l live in the service of J. Dixon, a slop-seller at Stamford. The prisoner came to my master's house about six o'clock in the morning of the 21st June, and offered a shirt for sale. 1 told him to wait until my master came down, but he want away, saying that he would call again. Mary Dixon examined.—l took the shirt brought by the prisoner to the last witness. It was the same shirt that my husband sold only the day before. I knew it by a particular mark on it. James Dixon proved that the shirt was the same as that sold by him to Myecua. Suspecting that the soldier had not got it honest. ly, he detained the shirt. The prisoner said he had bought it about a month before, and the witness replied, " You are a false man." - - The Chief Constable of Stamford stated that when he apprehended the prisoner he denied both the robbery, and the offering the shirt for sale. The prisoner denied that he was the person. The reason that he changed his dress was, that on the night in question he had to perform duty on the picket. His LONDSUIP summed up the evidence, and the Jury. after a consultation. of some minutes said, that they were satisfied the shirt was in possession of the prisoner, but that there was no positive evidence of his having robbed the prosecutor. The Learned Judge observed, that positive evidence, although desirable, was not absolutely essential to prove the offence of which the prisoner was charged. But if any doubts existed on their minds they ought to let the prisoner have the benefit of diem. The Jury again considered their verdict, and found the prisoner Guilty. His Lordship immediately passed sentence of death on the pri soner ; but observed, that as the prosecutor had not been put in bodily fear, the sentence would be commuted for transportation. James Hayes and Edward Burton were indicted for a burglary on the 2d May last, in the house of George Stockdale of Wain. ' fleet, in the county of Lincoln. It appearing by the evidence that at the time the prisoners burst into the house the prosecutor and his brother-in-law were sitting in a front parlour and in view of the door; and that the prisoners, though actually in the house, had not committed a robbery. His Lordship thogght this object of the prisoner* was roars tower*, than to rub, and that the indictment could not therefore be sus tained. The prisoners were accordingly acquitted NORTHERN CIRCUIT. YORKSHIRE ASSIZES, Yogi, JULY 19. CROWN SIDE. At the opening of the Court titisMOrtTing Mr. J. WILLIAMS appeared to show cause why the High Rai of the Seignory of tioldemess, in this county. should not be tined for not obeying the precept of the High Sheriff requiring him to return a certain number of Jurors from the said Seignory. There were me principal grounds on which the refusal of the High Bailiff was to be Justified. The first was a grant made by King Charles the Second to l.crd Viscount Dunbar, and his heirs, conferring upon them and him in lineal succession the exclusive privilege of having the return and execution of all writs, processes, and man. dates. warrants and precepts of his said .Majesty, Lis heirs, and successors, within the said Wapentake of Ifolderness, unless upon default of the Officers and Bailiff of the said Viscount Dunbar, and within the special writ of non °meter:it, in that case first had and provided. Now then, Sir Thomas Constable claimed to be the heir of the Viscount Dunbar, and therefore entitled to exemption. The second ground on which he contended that Sir Thomas Constable ought not to be fined was, that being a Roman Catholic, he found it incompatible with his religious duties to take the oath necessary to qualify hint to undertake or discharge the duties of the office of High Bailiff of the Seignory of Holderness. First, then, was the grant of exemption, or privilege granted b Ring Charles, and next there was the fact, that the Hi g h Bailiff, being a Catholic could not qualify so as to enable him to fulfil the duties of that situation. Under such circuntatanoes, therefore, he submitted that no fine should be indicted on Sir Thomas Con stable. !dr. Baron Her -Loot, after adverting to the inconvenience of not providing a sufficient number of Jurors, observed that he would line Sir Thom* Constable in the cum of ten pounds, with a view to bring the matter before the proper tribunal for a speedy and a fair decision. HIGHWAY ROBBERY. Was. Laptev, aged 25 years, was indicted for unulting Sas owl Bats= on the histtwoy, tho 14th Nay, • near Brodfouly and taking from his paten SM. In Odes. live shillings in gm I pocket pistol, a pair of spectacles, and other article, his propety. Samuel Hateson was examined at great length by Mr. HASID,. and deposed, that he was going to pay his rent to a gentleman in the neighbourhood of Hun-hill, and riding on a pony, by star light, three men rushed out upon him and attacked him with sticks; they beat him over the face and the head till he was covered with, blood ; they then robbed him, and kicked him till two of Ms ribs were broken. lie knew the men by sight very well, though not by name. He knew Kitson (not in custody) Very well. As to the pri.. loner at the bar, he or.ly saw him once before the robbery ; two days after he saw the prisoner in custody, and he then had the same clothes on as when he robbed witness, . . . The constable who apprehended the prisoner, and other pers ons . also found papers covered up near the prisoner's house, and answer. ing to the description of those lost by the prosecutor, which stem produced. Other corroborative circumstances were also sworn to. The prisoner. in his defence, denied all knowledge of the rob. bevy, and called his uncle, who gave him a good character, ad m i t . ting however, that he knew him to be the companion of Kitson. dr. Baron H u LLOCK recapitulated the evidence to the Jay, who, without limitation, found the prisoner Guilty. NISI PRIUS COURT. LEES 11. HUTCHINSON. This was an action brought by the plaintiff', a servant, against the defendant, his master, to recover the sum of 131. 95. for work and labour done, and also for money laid out and expended to the use and benefit of the defendant. The defendant pleaded that he was not liable, and upon that Is. sue was joined. Mr. TINDAL stated the ease to the Jury. It appeared that In November 1819, the plaintiff entered the service of the defendant, • gentleman residing near Richmond, in this county, and h a d continued (in bis service for some months. The plaintiff was to receive fourteen guineas a-yoar, besides the usual gratuities for riding races for his master, who was • gentleman of sporting notoriety. In the course of the year the plaintiff rode three races, one of which he gained, and the other two he lost. When a jockey won a race he usually received rd. Ss. and when lie lose be got • less sum, namely, M. Ss. ; so far, then, the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of 111. I is. Besides, the plain. tiff paid the Ring's duty at the Middleham races, and another sum of IL 16s. upon a subsequent occasion. The defendant bad at one time admitted the plaintiff's claim; though he now, for some rea son or other, thought proper to resist it. The brother of the plaintiff proved the contract as stated by Mr. Tindal. Robert Chadwick proved that he called for payment of the plain. tiff's demand, and that Mr. Hutchinson said he would pay it, bat that money was not then convenient. Mr. Joust Wrxxiams, for the plaintiff, said it was ember strange that the plaintiff should have left the service of the de. fendant without demanding xayment of this alleged debt, and that he, who could not remnin without it for four days, should have still allowed four years to elapse without demanding it. He was instructed to say, that he could confidently contradict the testimony of the plaintiff's brother, and that the defendant had never agreed to give plaintiff the gratuities which he now claimed. J. Robson examined—l know Chadwick. I saw him at my house, when I told him that I thought Mr. Hutchinson was very ill-used from what he told me. Mr. llutchinson told me that Chadwick had forced himself into his bed room, and presented to him a piece of paper, which ➢lr. Hutchinson said he supposed to be Lee's bill. _ _ Ir. TINDAL, in reply, contended that the very supposition on the part of the defendant, that the paper presented to him was Lee's bill, was in itself a very strong proot in favour of the plain. tiff's demand. 31r. Justice BAYLE Y recapitulated the whole of the evidence to the Jury; who, after retiring from the box for about too minury returned with a verdict for the defendant. CLARILSONy. HARDING, This was an action brought by the plaintiff, a widow lady, re., siding at Richmond, in the county of York, against the defendalt, a carpenter, to recover the amount of twelve months' board anti lodging. be sides several other sums, expended fur the use and on the behalf of the defendant. Mr. 1). F. Jo stES stated the case to the Jury, and called the fol. lowing evidence in support of it : John Myers examined—l am an Officer of the Excise ; 1 know the plaintiff, she is a widow living at Richmond, in this e tunny; I took a lodging at her house in the month of !November 18:Z; the defendant Harding, was not then a lodger there, though I us. derstood he had been at a previous period. While I wre there, however, he returned and remained for several week. On one occasion he asked the plaintiff if she had received the money; to which she replied, " Yes ;" and upon that they both wept up stairs to a MIT adjoining mine. I followed up stairs and went to my own room, where I heard some expressions which awAte my curiosity. I heard a good deal about a sum of 100/. whi c h I unders tood was to be advanced by the plaintiff to the defendant. He told her she had been a good friend to him, and he would shortly prove to her his honesty and his gratitude. At another time the defendant handed the plaintiff a mernoranduni.book, which he desired her to look at; but what it contained 1 cannot tell. Also on another occasion when plaintiff and defendant were together, I heard the plaintiff sobbing ; excited by curiosity went to the door of the plaintiff's room and listened. I overheard plaintiff requiring from the defendant a bill for what he had ob. tamed from her ; he said he did not think it at all necessary, as it was down in his own hook, and as stamps were very expensive. I think that a charge for hoard and lodging, alter the rate of from 14s. to 15s. a week would be quite moderate. Cross-examined by Mr. SCARLETT—Was your eye or your nose at the key hole of the door, or what I cannot exactly say, sometimes one and sometimes the other. Then how long did you remain in that interesting posture Some minutes. . Now, Sir, Lave you stated all you know upon that subject ? All I notic.d, perhaps I did not see all, u I was not very particular, only to gratify my curiosity. Mr. James Carter examinxl.—l am Adj.tent in the North York militia ' • I live near Mrs. Clarkson's. Ater the defendant had married 1 went to him on behalf of the plaintiff to demand her mo. ney, or a note by way of security for it. This, however, his refused; alleging that he had received no money from her, or it he bad that she could not prove it. I then said, she would take the money by inralments ; but this he also refused. 1 know that at the death of her husband site bad 130!. 1 know this because she asked me to take care of it for her. Mr. ScartLETT, for the defendant, contended that a great deal of suspicion attached to this case, and that as to the evidence ot the witness Myers, it might be altogether put out of the ease. A man who could have stooped to do the acts which he himselt admitted to have done—a man who could pimp and listen at a key. hole, was not the species of witness to which a Jury would lend their attention. The defendant positively denied that he had boarded and lodged with the plaintiff, or that he received money from her which was to be returned. True, the plaintiff thought she would have secured a husband in the defendant; but again ths defendant denied that he had ever held out to her any such hopes. But how that matter really was lie could not pretend to say; and yet— Mr. Justice BATLEY here suggested a reference, as the best method of settling a case like the present ; the arbitrator to examine the parties upon oath. After some consultation between the Counsel on both sides, this suggestion was agreed to, and a verdict taken fur the plaintiff, liable o reduction by Mr. Elsley, the referee. COAL MARKET, JULY 20. Siiips at Market. Ships Sold. Price. 21 Newcastle . 111 . 30. Ed to 39s 91 11 Sunderland . 9 -29 s Od to 40s 6d 1 Stone Coal . . 1 . 38s Od to -a Od 1 Culat 30s Od to —s Od BIRTH. On the 12th inat. in Galway, the lady of Richard Martin, Esq. of a daughti r. MARRIED. On Tuesday, the 19th in;ti:Ttiliensington, by the lief. Arch. deacon Pott, Captain Frederick Clements, of the Royal African Corps, to Alicia Frances, eldest daughter of the Rev. Richard Brickendcn, and niece:o the ki.rl of Cavan. . _ At Inch House, Edinburgh, on the 13th inst. Major Robert Gordon, of Hillhsd, to Jane, daughter a the late Walter Little Gihnour, Esq. of Libberton and Craigmillar. DIED. On the 18th instant, in Barton-street, Westminster, Catherine, wife of Arthur Easton, Esq. of the Board of Control. On Tuesday morning, the 19th inst. universally regretted, Mrs. Palaricini Campo Maggiore de la Toros, of Devonshire-place, Mary-la-bonne, aged 46. On Thurrilay, the 16th June, at Marchmont House, near Quebec, in the 78th yearhif his age, the Rt. Rev. Jacob Mountain, D.D., Lord Bishop of Quebec, formerly of Caius College, in the University of Cambridge. He was the first Protestant prelate in the Canadas, where he presided over the Church with apostolical teal and piety for 32 years. During this period he was, in con currence with his Majesty's Government and the venerable So ciety for the Propagation of the Gospel, the instrument, in the hands of Providence, of raising a regular Episcopal Establish ment in the two Canadair, and promoting the formation of mis. sions and the erection of churches in all the more populous town ships, which he regularly visited, even when age and infirmity had rendered so vast an fatiguing a circuit • most arduous and painful undertaking. The Cathedral Church at Quebec, erected under his aaspiees, and in consequence of his exertions, will serve as • monu ment to his memory ; and his name will be honoured in this Non h American colonies as long as respect remains for high and cult'. sated talent, for dignity and suavity of manners, for integrity, for benevolence, for loyalty, for religion. The language, however, which is usually employed on such occasions would very jrade tittately describe the distress of his family, the grief of his friends and dependents, the lamentations of the poor, and the regret which will pervade all parties and denominations in the country. His Lordship wnsi the second son of Jacob Mountain, Esq., of Thwaite Hall, Norfolk, and enjoyed, in early life, the honour of a particular intimacy with the late Mr. Pitt. At the time of his being selected by that StatmaLan for the See of Quebec, the pie ferment which he held was thilivings of Holbesch, Lincolnshire. and Buckden, Hunts, together with the Prebendal Stall of South Kelsey, in the Lincoln Cathedral, all in the gift of the present Lord Bishop of Winchester, to whom he was Essminiag Chaplain. MOH IVATER AT LONDON BRIDGE THIS DAY. limning 42 min. after 5. I Evecing 6 min. afteto. Printed at TH l BRITISH• PRESS Office, by J. W. C. 401,10 P, llitreitranti, and published by R. CANlSPle t aww Pk" •11 _ z •. (. 4 t l l. I