The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-11-14 00:00:00

MEETING OF IRISH CATHOLICS. Meeting called by pablic Aseocietion Room, Corn taken by Nies:nig appointed Secretary to the Meeting, which embracing the whole of the etttleman would have the net of the Meeting ; in the Worded him, of the ab home questions, which had intended provincial meet. their own mode. The after the following Secretary of which ten of the Province, respectable Meeting I prepare the dinner the Meeting, and that a correspon preparatory to the holding - - -- , tee were also making was aware of what Munster Meeting, o him, and request- Secretary to the Catholics slid so, and he was gentlemen concerned. and every where, to called upon. Fie -did, being called authority tickets I His answer was, doing so ; and the s who did so. legality of the Act, question was put to be asked, lip • • was suggested that _ be the best one for . the menthere belonging to Never, propose that the meeting .ore the sitting of Parliament, as Jested the last t4ession, a Bill might ,em meeting. Another reason was, that .01 Association were likely to be very im .lel be of material advantage to the interim of they should receive every publicity through the oolitic press, it would be well that they would not the proceedings of Parliament. The CHAIRMAN said, the matter was In their own hands. The none their petitions were sent to Parliament the better. He was eked, would they sle4ert from petitioning? His wish wan never to an, they should never injure their cause fit ndivid ua l ady an - Me would never desert from petitioein 'it had no ell her Mao that of exposing the grievances and injustice under which they laboured. Mv. RAMO te agreed with the Chairman. Mr. O'Constr.t.t. here entered, and was received with great an. plans He aildresaed the Chair, and said, that at the late Aggre. gate Meerlng a resolution was proposed, recommending constant petitioning. There were MI many disadvantages in their relaxing the esetitutional right which they possessed, that the propriety of myth aresotttslnn was quite apparent. During the short state or in. action in which their atairs remained lately, the English newspa pers bad entered into an active, persevering species of enmity anise them. It wits hut natural that they should have done so, " for." said the Learned lientlemen, " we are right, and they are wrong." Ile had entered upon the present question the more res. Sly, as he intended to propose that a Committee should be ap pointed fist two purprema ; the Rot was, to prepare the fora) of peti. s iollll.—/ he second, the regulating of the meetings of the late Ansel. svion which weer to be held. As to the lint, they had so often pe. tattooed, Sot that was easily arranged; they would have merely to reiterate their former prayer, demanding emancipation as a right— that while they would receive it with the utmost thankfulness, yet that they would seer solicit for it, but upon that immutable ono. tip).. They should refer to the treaty of Limerick, the provision of which Mr. Peel said should not he broken, and those provisions were to reinstate the Catholic; in the same stylises which they possessed in the reign of Charles li. And could it be denied that Out Catholics enjoyed seats in Parliament during that reign ? He that did an, he (11r. O'Connell) would refer to the page of history. These were the topics which should be contained in their put. nos, and they should be constant in their supply of them, for they Wien) the effect it had open SB4lllo* 4 Ikal a nd when they, the Catholics, were pouring in from sixteen to twentefietl. ties a day into Parliament. The presenting of petitions was of the greatest Ilse, calls for inquiry, and refutes the absurdity of charges which might be brought, agninet them. A resolution passed st the late Aggregate Meeting relative to the meeting of the ea Assochnirm. That Association could meet for fourteen days, lent there could be no senexion between the first and second ingot. A S . A sassed in seedy is a day or teas, **VIM( the kW ask sfibds en that subject. The Government were determined then tbeir grievances should be perpetual, but that their petitions to be relieved should be only occasional. He thought that the best Ray to ammeters the mu would of the old Association ould be the 6th or January, after the Christmas holyd les, as every gentleman would wish to be at home at Christmas. The Parliament had been prorogued until the 6th of January, but not for despatch of btisi r.ess, and it was likely it would be farther an until February. The Association could arrange the parochial meetings, and make pre. tuitions for a national dinner to their friends of every persuasion. rile latter so ild have a good effect ; it would not be merely the tornmencerrae it. but the enniinuatice of good feeling. Mr. O'Con red concluee I by proposing that a Committee be appointed for tnirteen days—in be within the words of this Act, for the purpose ot preparing petitions and suggesting the necessary arrangement, Um of flit with the :Ifs= attic stated that it was an error to suppose that the peo. pre of England were opposed to their claims. Mr. °Tooke tr. handed hie resolution to the Chairman, who suggested that the month of December wool., be the better time fur braiding the proposed meeting. The resolution was then altered as to the time, and being put from the Chair. passed unanimously. , The Committee was then being named, when upon the appoint. ing of Mr. Miclasiris klaxons—that gentleman having entered the Mona inquired the nature of the Committee, when the Chairman teed the resolution just. passed ; to the latter part of which Mr. Mahon objected. The words objected to were... that they should seek for unqualified emancipation without considering any other ablittliCt . question." Mr. Mahon conceived that such a resolutio n pat jutlgior the intended meeting at Carlos. ,Mr. L. PLUNIET thought Mr. Mahon quite right. •Mr. O'Curr NELL said that they were the words of the resolution iamb had passed at the Munster meeting. Mr. ()Tow NELL here read the resolution. Mr. Manua did conceive that the latter part of the resolution peojodged the meeting at Carlow. There were two subjects upon which.he wished to have the public opinion ; he meant the wings. V that opinion were against his be should bow to it. He wished for discussion upon them, and not allow them to be got shut of by 4 aide wind. He could think that agreeing to the liner part of the areolution would be the means of tieing them up from expressing ;nary opinion. Mr. O'Crismirxx perfectly agreed with Mr. Mahon on the sub jecr,, but said that if Mr. Illation wished for discussion, there *saki be a substantive motion made on the subject. Mr. Maltose—That is all I want. Any road by which the eb. :an I seek for ran be obtained, is the stole to me. Q'Cow•Ett said, that to connect the wings with emanci. patron now, would be to Injure the Catholic cause. However wise t might be before, it would be the very opposite then. Peel and Witt:Kral owl them as arguments against emancipation. Their Anis on the wing relative to the 40s. freeholders would be In print next day. He would suggest that day week the the discussion. M. Alums , asked Mr. OTiosittExt. would be bow to public cerioion io case it should be decided against him? Mr. 111 [CR *AD O'Griestax said, be naiad advocate the 406. freeholders, and he trusted he should net be alone upon the oo castpo. Mx Lintz Pumas? wimired the manly spirit of Mr. Richard - • He thought that - - notice of so kw sufficient. %) wield UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. 01101 D, Nov. 12. On Thursday last the following Degrees were con ferred:— ---- - Matter qf das—The Rev. Thomas Oliver Oootichild, Exeter College; Francis c. B e if our , Magdalen Jlall ; Charles Pitt, Christ Church; and the Hev. William Home. Christ Church. THE CHURCH. The Lord Bishop of Winchester has strongly recom mended the resumption of the everting service in the church of Chri tcburch, which had been discontinued, and has himself subscribed liberally towards the expense of light ing the church for that purpose. We are happ) to add, that the pious recommendation of his Lordship is to be car ried into effect forthwith. The Bishops of Bath and Wells and of Chichester have, it is said, rtquired two services to be performed on Sun days, in every parish in their Diocevcs, where the popula tion amounts to .500 persons; and we understand that the Bishop of Winchester intends to require the like services in his diocese. The Rev. Frederick Twialeton, Fellow of New College, Oxford, and Minister of Adiestrop, in Oxford, is ap pointed Archdeacon of Hereford, in the room of the late Archdeacon Lilly. The Hon. and Rev. Robert Eden, of Christ Church, Oxford, brother of Lord Auckland, has been I by Lord Baxley, to the valuable Living of Hcrtingford bury, vacant by the decease of Dr. Ridley. The Rev. Edward Coleridge, 8.A., rellow of Exeter College, Oxford, is presented to the Rectory of Monk silver, in the county of Somerset, vacant by the death of the Rev. Wm. Walker.—Patrons, the Dean and Canons of Windsor. The Earl of Carlisle has appointed the Rev. Dr. Crane, of Wadham College, Oxford, to he one of his Lordship's Domestic Chaplains. LONDON AND MANCHESTER EQUITABLE COMPANY. On Saturday a meeting of the Shareholders in ill's Company took place at the North andiSouth American Coffee-house—David Pollock, Esq. in the Chair. The Coat ItMAN mated, that the meeting had been convened for the purpose of considering the present condition of the affair, of the Company, and its future prospects of success ; and whether they should proceed with the objects of the concern without a charter, or watt until they should procure one, which he certainly consi dered they should be enabled to effect. Mr. KATE, the Solicitor to the Company, stated, that it had been determined upon by several gentlemen who held a large num ber of shares in the Company, to stay the proceedings in it until it should be ascertained how the London Equitable Loan Bill should be disposed Ofin Parliament. He had, when tirst the Bill was io troducest to the House of Commons, waited upon an influential Member in that House upon the subject, and was informed by him that he should certainly oppose it ; but the moment the merits of the Bill were made known to him, he altered his mind, and stated his decided approbation of the measure. A witness from Manches ter had stated in his evidence what hada great effect upon the Com mittee—namely, that the Company would, by means of loana. as , stet and keep up the small 31anchester manufacturers, who were often unable, whatever might be their necessities, to bring their goods into the market, without making a great sacrifice. tie (Mr. Kay) afterwards communicated with the Earl of Shaftesbury upon that subject, and his Lordship felt strong objections to the Bill; but when he was shown that it differed essentially from the London Equitable Loan Bi;l, he also determined to give it Ilia support. It was, however, resolved, that all proceedings should be at a ' stand, until their Lordships should decide upon the first Bill. The fare of that Bill wag known, and now it remained, with respect to this Company, to decide whether they shall commence operations upon the strength of the deed of settlement alone, or wait until they should obtain a chartist., which he had every reason to suppose would be granted. Mr. Pot•oce.—My opinion is, that we ought (not to proceed without a charter. Heavy expense', have been incurred in the pro. secution of the objects of the Company, and very little more will be necessary to obtain a charter. We have 201)01. in hand, and that is considerably more than will be necessary for that purpose. The expenses 'treacly incurred were inevitable. A was house had been purchased, and a superintendent had been employed ; as it was necessary, before they brought their Bill MAO Parliament. to have a certain existence; which existeoce esuld not be testified without a purchase of a house, and the employing of a superin tended.' He considered the; it wsa not likely that they should contract debts, as they were not to buy property, but clubbed their money to advance it upon goods which were more valuable than the money they advanced. They were free from all personal re sponsibility ; and no further advance of deposits, he would take upon hint to declare. would be required between this time and that at which the charter would be granted. without the consent of the filterehnlders. But if it was the opinion of the Meeting that the Company ought to proceed to an experiment without the charter, he would put a motion to that effect, if it was made by any share holder. A SHAREHOEDEL—II there a probability that a charter will be obtained. Mr. Pot.t.occ—Most certainly. A SHAREHOLDER asked how many out of the 10,000 shares had been paid up ? It wan answered by Mr. Kau, that 6.0001. had been paid, and that upon some of the shares, only the first instalment of seven shillings hall been paid ; upon most of them the first and second instalment, amounting together to 11. had been paid. A SHAREHOLDER, who said he held COW shares, and that he had many friends Who held numbers of shwa, declared that he and his friends would rather, if there appeared no strong proba bility of success, that the whole concern should be broken up, and a dividend of the property still remaining made, than ran the hazard of losing more money. He thought. that upon en occasion like this, the actual state of the funds of the Company ought to be stated, and that it might be shown, whether any, and what hopes existed, of ultimate success. (Hear, hear.) It appeared that out of the 6,6001. which had been paid into the banker's, only 210001. remained in hand. Why had not this enormous deficit of 40001. been accounted for ? (Cries of " shame, shame.") Alr. KATE—The first expenses, those incurred in application to Parliament, were infinitely the greatest ; and it is known that great expenses under such circumstances were inevitable. POl.Loct said, he should be very glad to lay the Recounts before the Meeting, but he had them not. lie had not been a Di. rector from the commencement of the Company, but he knew that the accounts of the expendi ure had bten authorised by the sub. scribers themselves. There were some deductions from the bill pre sented of the expenses by the former solicitor. A SHAREHOLDER said, the Company could not go on with such a number of subscribtrs as was now scotched to it, so well as if the prospectus had been acceded to by the sale of ten thousand shares. Mr. Pord.oce. said, that in the cage of a canal, or any great an. dertaking, that certainly might and would be the case; but here there was a difference. If the Company could not lend 20,0001.. why they could lend 10,0001.; that was all. Mr. KAYE said, that great expenses ware incurred by the ne. cessity of having witnesses up from Birmingham, who were de. tato& from day to day fur a length of time, in consequence of the numerous postponements. A SHAREHOLDER wan proceeding to affirm that there was no logic in Mr. Pollock's argument about the limited size of the ca pital, but he was interrupted by Mr. Por.zocc, who stated, that. after all, the thing they met to decide upon was. whether they were to wait for a charter, or go on without a charter, which would cost no more titan 4001. or 6001. The Shareholders seemed to be almost unanimously of opinion, that, the deeper they advanced in deposits, the heavier would the discount become. Mr. POLLOCK said, that arose from the demeaned *ate of the market; and that in all human probability that depresdon would soon ease. and every thing resome its wonted artieseence. At all events, those who purchased with the view of proseeoring the ob jects of the Company, need Dot are about the market, as they could have no idea of speculating in shares; and those who had F gambling, r - bed t• ' THE BRITISH PRESS. LAW Nu TICES. __..........._ EXCHEQUER COURT, Tina DAY. I Carysfort v. Wells, Capper v. Pagden. Atkinson t. Hutton, for Judgment. Price v. Spencer. Fielder v. Meynell. Roberson v. Le 3ler- lingo ti. Job. Evans v. Willistna. cier. Norton v. Hammond Bamford a. Archer. Bayley v. Bugg. D. and C. of York v. Miller v. Jackson. M it.dleburgh. ourt sits at ten o'clock. No Sitting!, in the Kin's Bench for Middlesex till Saturday neat, the 19:h ; and fur Loudon, till Monday week, the 2lat inst. _ _ LAW INTELLMENCE. COURT OF VIANCERY, SATURDAY, Nov. 12. IN THE MATTER OE THE NEV. MR. ra•xics • LUNATIC. The Sou CIT Oft-GENEWAL stated, that lie lied presented a pe tition in tins matter at the rising of the Court yes,enlay. which he wished his Lordship to snswer on an early day. The petition re presented mat Mrs. Franks had taken away the children of the marriage from the person under whose care they had been placed by the order of the Court, and prayed that she might be ordered to res:ore them, and be restrained afterwards from any more inter- Ferri:cc with them, till the further order of the Court. The Loup CHANCELLOR said, be would answer it for Monday. The Sni.icrTnit-GENFRAL considered that, as there might be some difficulty in serving the notice, Monday would be rather too earle, and therefore suggested Monday week. Lowpsuir accordingly made the OUMT for Monday week. DE IIEAVVOIII V. xtionts. This important cue (important as far as amount of property is concerned, and as respects the rights and Interests of the parties), it will be recollected, was argued at much leugth previous to the vacation. It regards a very large and valuable landed property situated at Hnxtcn, of which the plaintiff was the lessor, and the defendant the lessee, for a great number of years. Mr. Rhodes having lately obtained a new and very long lease of the estate, had commenced building upon the land t hsd erected warehouses on the banks of a canal which tan through the ground, and had ex cavated a basin, the expense of which alone was many thousand pounds. The value of the land was thus greatly increased, and .Mr. Rhodes began to reap the profits of his vast speculation. The rev lease, which had been obtained from the plaintiff's father, began row to be disputed by the present plaintiff, who became lessor upon the death of his father; and the principal grounds upon which it was disputed were, the use of undue influence by the defendant and his agent, and imbecility and incompetence on the part of the father. An injunction to restrain the building was applied for before the Vice-Chancellor; and, upon a full hearing of the case, his Honour was pleased, to a certain extent, to grant the application. By this proceeding same hundreds of workmen were immediately thrown out of employment, and the property itself, in this unfinished state, left to ruin and decay. The order of the ‘'ice-Chancellor was then appealed from, and upon this appeal Counsel were heard by his Lordship. at very great length, before the vacation. At the conclusion of the arguments, his Lordship threw out several intimations that the injunction could not stand without many rariatioun, but pronounced no decisive opinion upon the case. Judgment having been specially fixed for this day, all the parties were now in attendance, most anxious for a final determination of the case. The LoaD CIIANCEELOR stated, that he bad brought with him a portion only of the papers in this important case; the remainder he was compelled to leave behind him, being far too bulky to be brought into Court. As he was obliged to leave the Court at half-past one, to attend the Judges in the Exchequer Chamber, he should not today be enabled to go through the whole of the case. lie would therefore now state the facts, and give his rwons and opittious the tint thing on Tuesday morning. His Lord ship then, at very great length, proceeded to read the bill and answer put In, Together with the most material parts of the most voluminous correspondence, which passed between the parties on the subject of the lease in question, and particularly between 2tlr. Rhodes, 111 r. Tebbutt, Mr. Aspinal, and Mr. Dc Beauvoir, the present plaintiff. His Lordship, in proceeding through the evi dence, threw out many nbsetvations with respect to the particular import, bearing, and effect, of most of tire imporuint documents. After having continued the reading of these papefa for more than three hours, the remainder was postponed until Ttfesday. It is supposed that even then he will not give a final decision: COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WESTMINSTER, SATURDAY, NOV. 12. BLOKE V. STOCKDALE. Thin wan an action for a libel. published by the defendant in the Memoirs cy • ilutriate Wilson, on the plaintiff, a stone mason, of Piccadilly, tending to hold him up to ridicule anti can. tempt, as a person of low and vulgar manners and conversation, and to impute ushiin that he made a proposal of marriage to Penny Parker. the kept mistress of an officer. The damages were laid a. 300/. At the trial, betore the Chief Justice, at the al iddhsee Sittings Oct last Term, the defendant appeared in person, anti conducted his own case. The Jury louud their verdict fur the elacoastais 3404, Dlr. Snores:ran was now instructed, on behalf of the defend ant, to move foe a new trial, on the ground that the damages were excessive. He could not deep that the alleged libel was calculated to produce the effect imputed to it in the declaration ; but there was 'one circumstance taken into the consideration of the Jury, which no doubt had some weight with them in estimating the damages, but which, he had to submit, bad not been proved in a manner quite satisfactory. Mr. Scarlett, in his address to the Jury on be half of the plaintiff. relied very moth upon the circumstance or the plaintiff being married man at the very time he was supposed to have made a proposal of marriage to Fanny Parker. In order to make it appear probable that such was the fact, a single witness was called, who stated that had Fanny Parker been alive at the time of t h e trial, she would have been somewhere about 33 years of age. whereas., from the register of her baptism, which was produced, ft appeared that she must have been at least 43 years of age, This also was the only witness to prove that the plaintiff' had been married between 20 and 30 years. Where, therefore. there was so much inaccuracy in the testimony of the witness as to the age of one of the parties, his memory could not be safely depended upon as to time daring which the plaintiff had been married to his present wife. If, then his evidence could not be depended upon, the fact that Fanny Parker must have been at least 43 years of age at the time of the trial, had she been then living, must have justified the possibility, if not strong probability, that the plaintiff might have made the proposal of marriage suggested' whilst he was a bachelor, Fanny being then shoat the age of eighteen. What, therefore, the defendant bad to complain of was, that the .Lord Chief Justice did not point out to the Jury the discrepancy between the evidence of the witness, and the register of Fanny's baptism, upon a point which must have had a strong effect upon their minds in esti mating the damages. The Jury were allowed to consider the case an if all the facts opened by the plaintiff's Counsel had been proved, which they were not. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Is the time specified In the libel when the proposal of marriage was supposed to have been made. Mr. BROUGHAM—No, it certainly is not. Mr. Justice Baratv—Therefore you are to raise a resumption that the libellous letter was referring to a proposal which was sup posed to have been made twenty-tire years ago ? Mr. Ilaouestme said, the circumstance to which he had ad verted tended to show the probability that the plaintiff was not a married man at the period mentioned In eie certificate of baptism, and that F. Parker was then of an age capable of contracting mar riage. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—But you gay that the libel refers to no date whatever, when the proposal is said to have been made. Baouonam—The letter may have been written twenty-five years since ; Mrs. Parker has been dead eight or ten years. The Loan Cuter J 'slice—The letter purported to have been written by one sister to another (I think front the hie of Wight), stating that she had a proposal of marriage made to her by the plain tiff, mentioning bin trade and residence. Mr. Haouottast—The letter is certainly without date, and there is nothing to identity the time at which tt was written. Mr, Justice 14aYaer —Not the age of the writer ? Mr. Bootle:mem—All we know is, that the supposed writer must have been of 'he age of 41 at the time of the trial. The 1 9 0112 f :ITTreSl7STlts.—it was proved that theralnelfri eldest son was 23 years of itge. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Did it appear how long Mr. Blore kept v lonemasen's shop in Piccadilly? I observe stonemason,' • • Vedhalily, the second Catholic Meeting Du asekp:or to the Catholic Aseociati • • -Ast o'clock, the Chair was take .1 a. o . ooaass, Esq. My 14TMMum, Esq. was appa Si tise Csatiltaus road the requillon caning tin Hs am was of a eanpnehensive nature. embracing Catholic question. He hoped some Gentleman =to uplain the nature and object of th e he world take the opportunity afforded sena of any particular topic, to answer some que hive put to him abroad, relative to lie intended logs. He thought gentlemen should fix their way the 3lucater Meeting was conducted was aft , rouser :—A Committee was appointed, the Sec waft circulars to the Noblemen and Gentlemen segrestingan answer. By this means, • most res wad convened, and the Committee were able to p 1.11 a spect6c number ; make arrangements fur t 'prepare the necessary resolutions. CaSWAY begged to inform the Chairman NU, was going forward in Leinster, preparator the Provincial Meeting in Carlow. Arrangemeuts la c,usrutight and in the North. The Citatitstror, in continuation, said ha Ira J•lv..Conway had noted—the Committee fur the ii aid him (rho Chairmen) the honour of calling Oil 1 3% him to appear In his capacity as Secretary ct Ireland, and arrange the Meeting. He did • happy to cap, to the entire satisfaction of the gent) 1k was ready at sit times to go any where, ant I.t:end the different Provincial Meetings, if a thought it hut his duty to make the statement he 1400 to do ro. He was also asked, upon what • ae laud, and money demanded at the doors ? Tut could not tell. life. CoxwAv said there wan no law against do set of burplying was the free-will of the persons • The 018111111 AN said he was aware of the let asti h redosed the circumstance only because the "sr qt. Ilk RAYON said, there was **other question to hist day would the old Association meet ? It wa the drat day the Parliament assembled would be the commencement of the meetings of the merah. flit ore Association. He would, however, propose ing their minds too much affected by indiscretions which occurred in Court during the trial. Mr. Bunt . ° }tam said. lie had no other topics to arse. The Cuunr• then said, there wai no ground for disturbing the verdict. Rule refused. wetrott: V. SANDS. This was an action against a stakeholder, to recover 555., the amount of a wager lost nom a a cricket match. At the trial before Mr. Serj eant Onslow, at the last Assizes for Hertfordshire, the plaintiff' had a verdict for the amount claimed. Mr. ANDREWS now moved to set aside the judgment, on the ground that the Learned Sergeant ought not to have tried the cause, inasmuch as it arose out of an illegal wager. Ile cited the case of Egerton v. Furzman, where the Lord Chief Justice, about a year since, refused to try a wager respecting two fighting dogs. The Loan CUTE'. JUSTICE—ShouId you not have objected to the cause being tried at the time it was called on ? Mr. A. said, it was suggested that it was not a cause proper to be tried, and the case of Egerton r. Furman was mentioned to the Learned Judge, but his bordshlp said he could not determine whe ther it was a fit case to be tried until he heard the facts proved, and the cause proemial The LOAD C u rer JUSTICE—But if the Learned Judge has exercised his discretion in allowing the trial to proceed, can we dis turb the verdict ? It is for the Judge codetermine whether he will try a cause. Mr. Justice 13a1ley adopted this principle, and said he was in the habit of exercising such a discretion as to cases which he thought unfit for the dignity of a Court of Justice. Mr. ANDREWS contended, that as the waget was clearly illegal, the Judge ought to have stopped the cause. The LORD CHIEF .1-nsTICE—I am by no means clear of that. Mr. ANDREWS submitted, that at all events the plaintiff could not retain the verdict, the wager being illegal. A cricket match was held to be one of the illegal games contrmplated by the Sta. Lute of Anne ;so was a foot race, and all gainea at cards. Here lie alleged dishoneety in the transaction. A match had been made between eleven gentlemen of Enfield against the same number of gentlemen of Cheshunt, at five pounds ahead. The stakes rare deposited In the defendant's hands. It turned out that the Ches. hunt men had imposed upon the Enfield men, by clandestinely in troducing two players from another place, who were better cricket ers than they could produce in their own parish. The Cove T, however, said that the sum being under 101. it was not a cue within the statute of Anne, and therefore refused the rule. HAT WOOD V. PITT. This waa an action for seducing the plaintiff's daughter. At the last Worcestershire Assizes, the Learned Judge who presided, sug gested, that as the plain vil's daughter and the defendant were stated to be still attached to,. b other, and as a promise of marrisge had been made, a verdict tit One Thousand Pounds should he entered, which should he set aside, on condition that the defendant married the girl within a month. To this proposition the defendant ac ceded, and a verdict for a thousand pounds was entered accord. ingly. lilt. RUSSELL now moved to set aside the verdict, stating, that the defendant, in performance of his engagement, had procured a license and the wedding-ring, and went to the plaintiff's house for his bride, in a post-chaise, for the purpose of taking her to church, and solemnizing the marriage ; but the young lady refused to have him, preferring the thousand pounds for which the verdict had been entered. Upon this statement of the case the Court granted a Rule Nisi. At two o'clock the Judges went to the Exchequer to prick for Sheriffs. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SATUUDAT, Nov. 12. CUOT.NONDELY V. PAXTOY. The Losso-CHlEFjl.7sTinx..ai thesii;luirof the Court, deli vered judgment in this case. The principal questions in the cause were—whether a power granted by a will had been properly exer cised or not, and whether that power had been properly pleaded ? These questions depended chiefly on the application of legal and technical forms, and his Lordship, after giving a very learned judg ment upon them, declared the opinion of the Court to be in favour of the power. SANDEIISON L. LAMBKIN. Mr. Sergeant WYLUE moved for a rule to show cause why the proceedings on the bailbond in this case should not be set aside, on the ground that the affidavit of debt, Bled by the plaintiff, had ' been improperly framed. It appeared from the Learned Sergeant's statement, that the af t fidvait was rather an allegation of the result of legal reasoning, than a detail of facts, and that it was framed in such a manner, that if the words were literally construed, the pleintiff might be in dicted for perjury. The LORD Cum' JUSTICE—Then the plaintiff must take the consequences of that. If he has rendered himself liable to the pil lory he must go there. Mr. Sergeant ll' lune observed, that the Court would not only punish the guilty party, but would relieve the other from the con sequences. Besides, thank Gtd, a man was not to be put into the pillory for being a bad lawyer, for if that were the case, more than half of the people in this country must submit to that punishment. —( A laugh.) The Court granted the rule. COURT OF EXCIIEQUii,R, SATgamAr.igar. - • THE TRUSTEES OF THE CHELTENHAM T ru.Nriß ES V. LETT Mr. Ctrawooo moved for a rule to show cause why a non. suit should not be entered In the above cause, which was tried at the last Assizes for the county of Gloucester. The trustees had let by contract the tolls arising from certain turnpikes in the en virons of Cheltenham, at a rental ; the defendant objected to the authority of the trustees so to let, and that they erected one gate, where they had no jurisdiction. They subsequently braught their action for a bretch of contract, and obtained a verdict against the defendants, although it was proved that some of the trustees themselves had refused to pay the toll at one of the gates that they had erected. Rule granted. There are four actions pendiog under similar POLICE. MANSION-HOUSE. On Satnrday Mr. Cooke, the Managing Director of the Owe. nappe Mining Company, appeared before the Lord Mayor, fur the purpose of swearing to the truth of the contents of a paper, which he held in his hand, relative to the interview he had had with Lord Nugent on the subject of the shares allotted in that Company to his Lordship. Mr. Cooke requested that the Lord Mayor would grant him the indulgence, which had been, in so kind and gentlemanlike a man ner, conceded to him by his Lordship's predecessor. The Lonft Mal'Oft said Mr. Cooke's stcement should be at. tended to. Mr. Cooke then said, that Lord Nugent had sent a letter to the newspapers, asserting that the note signed by his Lordship, which had been published some days ago, referred not to the Gwenappe Company, but to sonic other Company. Now it is his (Mr. Cooke's) object, to rivet his Lordship down to that statement, and he thought he should add to the strength of the ease he had made out before the public, by an affidavit of the facts, in contradiction to his Lordship's last letter. lie should nut have given his Lordship the trouble to attend to any further obserra. don upon the subject of what had taken place ; nor, indeed, s'iould he have given his Lordship's excellent predecessor any trouble, had not the rank of Lord Nugent prevented him from resortitig to another alternative. The Loan MAYOR—You must not, Sir, make any further al. Fusion to that alternative here. Air. Cooke begged pardon fur having made the allusion to what might in other circumstances have been done. lie then mentioned, that it would be fully proved at a meeting of the shareholders, which was to be held very shortly, that all he (Mr. Cooke) had stated was perfectly correct, that the affairs of the Company were carried on in the most fair and honourable manner, and that there was the most certain prospect of success in its operations. The LORD AIATOR said, he had not objected to hearing the statement of the gentleman, as his object was, no doubt, to have Publicity given to his contradiction of a charge which had been pub licly made against him. ills Lordship said, he agreed in every thing that had fallen from his worthy predecessor relative to Shares in Companies, but the Chief Magistrate had nothing to do with the punishment of persons who had acted improperly with respect to them. He agreed to the opinion expressed, as to tile prohabl•C•W.' sequences of those mad speculations, and that the Directors should do all in their power to give satisfaction to the Shareholders, with . . . . . z sig above efore share .ever patties. premium name ' who they, rely i"g a upon her representations and her promisee( pu ft . allowed )t er to have certain geode; but when they deilisideO men, , e refused to give them a farthing, Laid she was a r0t0,,,. woman, and it wait to bee husband th e y must 100k fee p oy : The applicant allowed that be WAS unable to contradict in. ment as 'to her being a married wom an , b ut as she had ;oal; upon him by repr-aenting herself to b e a w id ow, he thought it s o ; • fi t subject for the Magistrat e ' s interference, and therefore 1 ;. quested a warrant might issue for her apprehension. The apph cii added, that he ttid nut apply to her for payruent until he account in the Papers of her examinati on on a similar ellogeZ another Police-office. and on whi c h occas i on her plea of covers ,, obtained her liberation. lie th e n requeste d she would dischal. his bill, which certainly did not amount to more than 8(.; hut:, also informed him that she was a married woman, and refused pi Ing Ills demand, altho ug h h e s h ou ld i mag i ne she was fully omit teat to do so, as she at that time kept • large establishment. Mr. fla Li., recommended the licant to ascertain fla sky b / a married woman, and if she wasmar ried he (the applicant)o compel the husband to disch arge t h e d eman d . sjak The applicant said it was impossible he could ascertain thug, cumatanee. lie had commenced an action against her, 4 1 ;1 4 thought she could also be apprehended fur swindling. Mr. llatt.s said, as he had commenced the action, he could res. der Idea no assistance. lie must follow up the proceedings, abide the result, whatever it might be. On Saturday a man named HigFins, in the emp l oyment 0 Messrs. Pugh, upholetere r a , in High.street, Southwark, re , brought before the sitting Magistrate, L. B. ALLEN, Laq• charm with robbing his employers to a considerable extent. One of the gentlemen belonging to the firm stated that thep& sonar was for some length of time suspected of robbing the p in mince before he was detected. The clay on which he was en . prehended a plan was laid for his detection. One of th` e ; trustworthy servants had directions to conceal himself in hl warelimute to which the suspected man had access. Th e dividual in question had not been long in hie concealmeat before lie observed the prisoner enter it, and proceed to roman' large beg of feathers, which he carried out on his back into them e of the premises, and set it down in a situation from whence he v O O4 find nu impediment in the way of removing it off entirely islie n opportunity offered. The circumstance was mentimed to the lira ; one of whom questioned Higgins, who exhibited great manna ; and, subsequently, 'a search warrant was procured, and exempt upon the prisoner's premises, where a great quantity of prope r t y consisting oPaiartieles used in the tr a d e , and bdongutg to Me te r'', Pugh, went discovered. The prisoner was remanded for anottae examination, in order to have the aitendance of a principal eitn er to whom Higgins sent a quantity of Russia leather that ps bas taken from his employers. VW CI U./ give 156113101,10 . 1. IV UM otioicumocus, will, -..-- .... ...--. s" 'r""...'.." " '" '..."‘..... """ ".""' """ """ i kept a conemasee's shop in Piceidilly ? for InCserve • ... that he j respect to disposal " of their property. Be had hoped that mat. for the sake of gambling, could expect, and de. 1 O'Fi - eini - a - rj - if; thought that a week's notice oi se important Porch- I, rd enereli described in the letter aaa stonemason, of Piccadilly, at the time it ! ten of this desctiption were entirely at an end, especially as related a di aco n al was atm su ffi c i ent . (H ear . h elm ) H e would i nggest sewed nothing Ohl than what bad takes place generally, with 'is supposed to I.see been written. to the (}wen Mining GOiapany, and he trusted this, at any slbetidgitt. resrect to shares. Mr. Buono IiAZI-1 don't know that any evidence was given rate, would be a conclueion. In justice to Lord Yugent, he had to !It. Swett addressed the Chair In a speech of 'son. length. Mr. KAYE said, that if the Company came to the determination upon that subjeil. The defendant ionducteti his own ease. mention that he had a day or two ago received a note, with Lord lie ennead by relating a remarkable observation of Nip& to wait for a abetter , he could vouch for the Mallet/tate purchase of ledrumitrta, who upon b e ing wilted by o ne o f hi s m i n i s t r y w h y 'several hundreciehe r es. The Loan Cuter Juarres--One of the g rounds letters ends of compl a int Nugent' s nam e to i t , denying that the contradicting the .411 n made by the plaintif f ' s Counsel was, the di cull. of identifyi n g statements made by 31r. Cooke were his writing, and declaring that that cosetryes turn were divided amongst theme his thoughts to Ireland. replied, that the people A Sitio enotpr. e5....1 move that the Company be disaleed, the time when the letter waesuepored t o h ave b een wr i tten. i n ord they were forgeries. lie' suspected the moment he saw this note lvee; this reply of that end that what remains of the deposits be paid tato the hands oi the er esettiwated man was ton true, and was bo rne out by t hi s con d uct on shareholder,. that evidence might be adduced to show that the insin uat i on cou ld th at i t was a torgery, toad he ascertained, upon transmitting it to not possibly be true. But, Mr. Brougham, can yo u t e ll me w h at his Lordship, th a t I t certainly wan such. Now, whoever wrote that aspresent occasion. The veto and the le a rn e d g en tl emen h a d th e Mr. K ATE objected, th a t ther e was a c l ause i n t h e 'D ee d o f S et- I ought to have done, it the trial, which I did not d o ? note, most assuredly meant Lord Nugent a very great injury. concurrence of the Aristocracy, a number of the Bishopt, &e. yet tleineet preventing the diseolution of the Company un t il after two Mr. BROEOHAM said, he was he t tru c t e d, w i t h great submission, N othing could be more culpable than the endeavour to prejudice a sateen It was foaled ton be opposed by the great boy of the people, meetings should be held for the discussi o n o f th e propmetten, with to say, that his Lordship ought, in his summing up, to have man by such means . Had he (the Lord Mayor) stated, before he the recollection of it wan lost in a general call for unqualified eman. the interval , of six months. (Cries of " shame ! shame !") He guarded the Jury against aasomitig as c fact. that the plainti f f tae got the contradiction of his Lordship to the genuineness of the sig- apatite. He implored them to let that be the fate of the present then read the clause to that effect, but a married man at the time when the proposal of marriage was al. nature mentioned, that he had received a note to the effect above askeet of dtmesision, for the agitation of the question could do no Mr. POLI.O . CE said, he felt it d to be his duty to say,. that as leged to have been made--it being highly probable, from the eir. stated from his Lorilallip, it. would no doubt have appear t 1 before p', _ , bat :nightie great harm. He said that for one, seeing what the Company is not. at work heel not NOM ter t h e . cl i sitse binding: eumstances. that the fact was not 11 0 . the public. advattsges wouldissult to Ireland front emancipation, promoting and that if the shareholders thought proper a they r t rug it come to the Illr. Justice 13.trz.tr —But if there was nothing proved on the Mr. Cooke said, that nothing could be more contemptible, or wit,. teeming mesperity, and bestowing general blessings, would resolution to . dissoive. and go to the right h - bou i t d mitiesiustely. part ofthe defndant, nor any thing stated in the letter fro m whi c h more deserving of punishment, ihin such conduct as had been just bstrin On it had been ealbad) for all Mom, by ageeeing to the lite question was then put, and every tae age of the n artim could be collected, sou to raise the presump. described. Mi. Cooke then made the following affidavit tyres. Mr. Shed concluded by calling on them to forget the one, WU held up In favour of the motion. an . d the I":"' ,"retest . Lion that the fact was dillerent there was nothing which my Lord " London, to Wit.—J. M. Cooke, of Buckleraburr, in the city 1r . and _join is calling for unqualifim' emancipation. After some roivernation , it was determined to instruct the ni. could e ' . leave to the Jury upon thesubyeet. of London, maketh oath : ` • /Sp LT gem, Eitq. baying been celled to the chair, the rectors to distribute the de posits . according to the best of their judg- Mr. Bator carnet admitted again that the letter was wholly silent " Ist. That he never had any transaction, either directly or indi- ' or the meeting were given to Nicholas Parcel 011ormen, Meat, after the expenses incurred shouldise paid off. reedy, with Lord Nugent or Mr. Wm. Stewart, in money or tie media in the chafe The meeting then adjeureed. The Meeting then broke up. as to dates, or miter circumstances affording a clue to dates. The Lown tinter Jusr icga-One of fits Witallatill preyed that . ah sees. excepting at the request made by the latter, on behalf of this woman. Fanny Parker, insillkting 13 .__ ._—__— ~ r..._ __-____.......-- not untiltsiy, that by the recent investigation of theyeas Macs lay her mat.. Lord Nugent, as to the shares ia the Gwena.ppe Mining Company. e We unaelltend it has been determined not t 6 3. P r q uellt e den Mae, is Shenherd'e maritmil4 was proved that at that time " 211. That he never bought of. or sold to Mr. Stewart, any share , $ family at D artmma k w ill m k t 30,0001. any farther the attempts to discover a ) , 7ortli-West Pas- the plaintiff's eldest son was I ita.olthstelears old. This tact or sham, or had any money transaction whatever with him, or ever ' s4 *: .Morsel . sage to the Pacific °cum.—Hampshire l'ekgratit. wee proved by a *knew s whoot*defesdant himself called ; for I did hand his (Mid deponent's) check, or ever was requested to Mind ..• mount of the present state of religions Akin in On Friday morning, twenty 41,11 convicts ender frairenEC h/tieTe he called the Olaindiro an is a witness. who denied all it , through or by Mr. Stewart, to Lord Nugent or any other patties, of Fenny Parker. - - tt,ull, this deponent was required to pay Lord Nugent a premium Praises are very discouraging to the friends of liberty of of transportation fur various tonne were removed from inte*ltwi j e ed - . 'D i sad that it might as • The fioeioty of Jesuits hidden behind a secret Newgate, under a strong escort, i n ' a caravan to Ports- anvil the „ B• ii it a ° ,,, il an A , ll ,,, — ,:;: ll l : l /- • . the WON of showing upon firtx shares in the Gwenappe Company." BOW-STREET. sankatleslol44l " th e Covregetion," is making daily month, in order to be put cm hostel one of the transport - well apply to the son as to the .". - : A respectable tradesman came before Mr. HALLS, on Saturday, lidgrill• The 4 111 11 11 CII&A• poiiry seeks every owns ships shout to . sail . for Van Diernena Land. Hammond, . The Loan ( s l . it e tu ret, J r t t rir t - 44 . indeed the principal for the , tar se of ob l iait: L i d - of a warrantme 4 , f ap o s i t ic a e la t e " who a s n e d na wl e 4 *log die French elegy, and assum in g the who a short tim e since was convicted o' stalling a valuable 3: 6 0 . 1 : 26 .1"_ n ir k*, .soonos out of suss kaise KODerl i ßl v ore. rw th n e , or p os. l* '', 7 licliw t:4:l l 4 7 lM:: the ee has a e s; i l l en: l l e fd Y es n tallslorrent n eTout twelves miles from London, . on of temporal affairs The design of all these in- anuff-box from Sir George Arie,iteme, r whicir are clothed en* the roil 4 piety and die- St. George's Church Hanover . . raid timell..eenaiois, the weatermread s The 'Applicant Mated, that the lady in question ID kedite ehielk Lieni called upon him, ss the had done upon several other tradesmen, !tritednees, begin. to be widastood is Fmk*. swirlier. He was sentenced to` r iar r a anion , the t h 141. flage allarial I ',- anon.' 1 c ion, that I look considerable pales ioptareat the,Mi d ecd' o stated to them that she was a widow in good circumstances, and RIOTS IN TAR 'SLR OF MAY: In consequence of the riotous proceedings on the Isle of Man, of which we gave an account on Saturday, the fol lowing Proclamation has been issued by the Lieutenant- Governor : .4 Whereas a number of persons did, MI the eveningot Friday, the 2ffili of October inst. assemble themselves, in riotous manner, in the parish of Kirk Christ Rushee', and did then and there coin. mit various outrages against the public peace, and cause various injuries to be done to the persons and properties of certain of his 11Iajesty's liege subjects ; and whereas several of the persons sup. posed to be engaged in the said riot are now imprisoned in the Cas. tle Rushen, to abide a trial for such offence. The Lieutenant. Governor, therefore, deeply impressed with a sense of the disgrace and calamity which a repetition of such daring and lawless conduct may bring on this island, hereby orders the Captains of Parishes, High Bailiffs, Coroners, Constables, and other officers, to use their utmost endeavours to preserve the peace ; and he strictly enjoins the inhabitants to demean themselves as becomes peaceable sub. jects, and by rendering due observance to the laws, show themselves deserving of that favour and protection which his Majesty's Go. vernment is ever ready to extend to a loyal people. "C. SMELT, " Given at Cas t le R us h en , Oct. SI, 1825." Ideut..Gov. SPORTING INTAiLLIGENCZ. HUNTING APPOINTMENTS. The Ihmhledon hounds will mce• on Wednesday, at Westbury; and Friday, at Steven's Castle Down, at ten o'clock c The Hampshire hounds will tneet to-morrow, at F. , ur Heauworth ; Thursday, at Nutley Church; and Saturday, at Northington Down, ar ten o'clock. THE ARMY. Detachments belonging to the 3d Regiment of Dragoon Guards, the 24th, and 62d Regiments of Infantry marched on Saimaa), from Westminster for Bri sto l, on route to Ireland. Detachments belongi ig to the Bth, 12;h, and 24th Rhtiments of Foos, marched on Saturday, f rom W estm i nster. thr Plymouth. Detachments; belonging to the 3M, 16th, 18111,201 h, 2111,23 d, 2816, 30th, 39th, 40 , h. 41st, 45th, 47th. 48th, 64th. 81st, 96lti Regittients of Foot, and the East India Company's Artillery, embarked, oa the 25thunder the conimaid of Staff sergeaLt Alitchell, at Cork, for England. A Detachment belonging to the 15th Regiment of Foot an. barked, on the 25th ult. at Cork, for England, on the Recruiting Service. Detachments belonging to the 2d, 13th, 21st, 28th, 30th,38th, 38th, 39th, 44th. Cith, 46th. 47th, slst, 6241, 64th. 69th. 67th, ad, 85th. 117th. 89th, 90th. 96th, and Bilth Regiments of Fent, the Royal Staff Corps, and the East India Comrany's Service, em. barked, on the lac instant, under the command of Sufi Sergtaa Campbell, at Dublin, for England. Detachments belonging to the Grenadier Guards, the flhand hat Regiments of Infantry, embarked, on the 3.1 instant, at Cod, for England. The Court Alartial on Lieutenant Pinhead and Ensign Roe. croft, of the 534 Regiment (of which 313j1r-(icr.eral Sir Edward Blakeney, is President) adjourned on Saturday to this morning. to examine witnesses In defence of Ensign Itowcrnti. The charges originated in some intemperate expressions winch were used ty Ensign Rowcroft, in a misunderstanding which arose between these officers when on a altootitig excursion. ------- ---• MEETIGNS OF CREDITORS, AT TUE COURT OF COMMISSIONER/ OF BARRRUPTII, BASIEGUIALLATREET. T 0. MO RD OW. THIRD MEETINGS. Hill, W. Arundel -street. Penton-square, tailor Nichol, J. and P. Cornhill, merchants - Sandwell, E. Strand, tavern-keeper Smith, J. Broad -street, broker . - II - II - I SECOND MEETINGS. Alexander, W. Fineh.lane, Cornhin. nu rchnnt - - 11 Jackson, J. Horviirs-row, Hammersmith, shopkeeper . 11 Harding, H. Chapel-street, and New.mad, timber merchant 2 Harris, G. W. and Evans, C. Southampton, and Portsea, lir.m. drapers - - - Humphreys, J. Harlow. Essex, builder . . . Smith, C. S. Bisimpsgate-street, and Camberwell, draper . 12 Tattoo, T. Gerurtl.sireet, Soho, grocer . . . 11 Wenhert, H. Lcicesier-square. tailor . . . 12 Wilson, J. King.street, merchant . . . It Woods, J. and Williams, H. Hastings, Sussex, grocers • 12 FIRST MEETINGS. Edwards, J. Thames-bank, near Van xhalt-bridge, tron-fourd:t Giles, IV. Heston. Middlesex, dealer . . Goodyer, T. Aldersgate-stmt, stew hat manufacturer • II DIVIDENDS. Barge, B. Cliffbrd-street, Bond•street. wine merchant Gonipertz, A. Great 'Winchester -street, merchant Hamelin, P. Belmont-place, Vauxhall, plasterer - Roberts, P. P. 11. HO Holborn, theesemonger - . 11 . 11 On Wednesday morning, about two o'clock, a fire took place on the premises of Mr. Mitchell, the Sun Inn, in the town of Biggleswade, 45 miles from London, on the rat north road. The fire was first discovered in a barn, which very quickly; from its being thatched, formed a volows o f flame, and soon communicatud to a long range of stabling, capable of containing near 100 horses. The stables, which were thatched, contained a great slumber of horses, and aetch was the rapidity of the fire, that eight of them were literally burnt to a cinder. BIRTHS. • At Belfast, on the 4th instant, the lady of Major Middleton. Nd regiment, of a ann. On the 4th instant, the lady of Franela Bcynoi Becket Esq. or Moor-hall, Warwickshire, of a daughter. On the 7th Instant, at Ball 'Jaye, near Leek, the lady of Frr.rns Gibbon Spilsbury, E.q. of a daughter. MARRIED. On the 10th Instant, at Rioters., church. Rich..l. Lane. El. to Sophia, fifth daughter of Edward Hodges, Esq. ot Clapham Common. At All Saints, Huntingdon, on the 10th instant, George tril. Him Wllgress, Esq. to Frances Barbara, eldest daughter of the late Colonel Farquhar. DIED. On the 9:h instant, in his filth year, at the Rectory-horse. Greensted, near Ongar, Essex, the Rev. William Hamilton Wa rren, M.A. thirty-one years Rector of Greensted, and Vtrar. , Great Budworth, Cheshire, and late student of Christchurch , Oxford. On the let instant, at Dawlish, Devon, aged 33, Eiisabeth Arr. wife of the lion. George Lysaght. On the invent, at Burton-crescent, Ferdinand de Alethra. Esq. of the Stock-Exchange, in the Slat year of his age. g li o ( s u g ) t . n h i tli n t e e t 24 o h f e D in n e t s o v nin n o i n a sh l clt e.sq „ in s ttare. fr th ie e n p 'r t 'i h h° ye u a ' r e. o a l h a ir' age, Tsa"sc. HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE THIS DAY Maiming, 41 min. after 4. I Evening/4 slim. aber Priam! at THE BRITISH PRESS Office, by J. W. C,►asrox *nod, and published by R. CAEcors new pMrs• / 2 L • N(7 cor,Tod T" rbg 0 Di fl} P.P r'410 4 14. age sof a .I‘ol iwo or I- &II Pi r. .0 A„ After pgAOND woNk:. _ - beets io r E to ,_ be .on sole icia "'' Idth, to J o'clook, Salo only —* *RTC - )11 -.l*- tZ Lice dog of tit Tavern, the CAI rooted to lOth toot the Call feited. 7, Am of ART' Eigex, E bee, 1811 Junes 11 ei his Ch 111tIt the 34,Ui In ell: sedg an modest< Rooms from the pint bay A gm of the H Soup Good ft. }inf. qu 11120 ~ . 1 H ° Acton tent of item the AS to cc Price, II the exte pay the It has compelll boundet debts, a Tom and to very MX blidurie They LAND obtainee for egsh part of t sdicit ft tau wit An e and Or SEW I'l' ~ct~~ fiegs 11e prices ()him Minn The: froth th Port fn Ditto, Ditto, i Crustcx Ditto, bottl Sherry. Lisbon very ( dine in 1, No reeler this ti JAM ,Be J 41 1 fat i beta Ti rum nnri of ap 11741 tent) Une that ALI