The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1826-07-28 00:00:00

1 Ine neighbours,. lied failed, and were offering !even sbillinp and Pirkit, the property of the plaintiffs as assignees,) with this die. inzpeAtee In the par& keener may, that the legitimate Pulpit appeared to be " printed Crosa.examinen—After the defendant -had told me, I told him and published for the 'summer( of Kaight and Lacey, Paternoster. that I had already heard the report. In fact, I had heard ft about row, " while the spurious edition ptafessed to be published "by three oiclock that afternoon. The plaintiffs have carried the same Knight and Lamy, laateter-row." This was the publication collectable eppeararce since that time as before. The defendant complained of, and to restrain the defandant from publishing • at present a /salaried clerk to Mr. AVa•son. I cannot say whe. which, the plaintiff's had filed their bill, and instructed him to Are he is at the point of death ; but he is very ill, and has been an apply . to the Court for an inju n ction. i.e tat last six or eight month-. ' 3lr HORNE commenced his argument in. resistance of the tno i • written evi. Re-exismined—A report of such a minim might tareince great tion, by remarking upon the fact, that there was no inconvenience to some establishment.; but not to such an este- I deuce to prove that the sale of the copyright, proposed in the do. Was:Meat e n M mum . S p oses % They r eceived no injury at all. I fentiant's letter, bad ever been completed. The affidavit of the lave not seen the a e f e naant driving gig lately. am sure the defendant, Robertson, denied that he had owed 30/. to Bentley ; defendant doe% not keep a gig- and further, that be had no recollection of the particular lite- Therhas Smith lam an auctioneer. I know the defendant. I Tall work offered for sale by him to the bankrupts, in the letter SSW BHP on the 20,h of march lest. Defendant came to me. arc' read to the Learned Counsel, for it was not specified. nor did he re mit' •• Spines are elating 7s. 6d • in the pound." I and "Do member having received the damage of 120/. referred tn. you ray so P" Ile muffed, YES, and A give you a hint." The VICE-CHANCELLOR thought there had been no case made Cross -examined-1 em certain that the defendant did not Ley out for the defendants. The memory of Mr. Robertson appeared to he very defective, for it had failed to remind him of his having that what lie ml' me was a report. Marin bovie—l am • ship and insurance broker. I know the written a letter containing as plain a proposition cf sale as had tlefemtant, anti saw him at the Recharge. at Sunderland , between ever been stated. No sufficiently strong reliance could therefore -eleven and twelve seek& on the 28th of March last. I heard him be placed upon the defendant's memory in contradiction of facts sior to Winter,' Spence, •'‘ The Spores have failed, and have been positively sworn to. The injunction prayed for must theretore be offer - 1-g 7s. Cal. in the tround to their ereditore." granted. John Tindal , a elerk of the plaintiff s, stated that the plaintiff* Mr. Floater hoped his client would be paid the ISOI., of which bad unstained considerable injury from the report in qttestion. he had not received a farthing. • Hebert Spire, the son of one of the plaintiffs, confirmed the sc. 31r. HEAL said the mosey had been alreadZy NE,.I MOCK Or last witness. He knew that o ne of the partners h al been THE MECHANIC'S 31A0A enamelled to go to London, Leeds, Manchester, and some other MAIOY AND SID EY V. ROBERTSON. alos, in coneequence of the report. Alr. Hasten (with whom was Mr. BOOTH) said, that the par- This was the case for the plaintiff. ties in this case were the same as in the preceding one, with the Mr. Wreeteels addressed the Jury for the defendant. The omission of the late defendant, Aleikleliam, who had nothing to do weeds laid 13 the declaration having been proved by mnre than one with the present suit. The case of the Pulpit ushered before his witness, whom he Was not in a situation to contradict, it became Horton, that of another literary work, in which it was his duty to ed. duty to address them on behalf of the unfortunate defendant, submit a motion similar to that which he had just made, and in .. and to address to them such observations as might tend to reduce the which the Court had just acquiesced, namely—an injunction to re which, as the case now stood, they would undoubtedly strain th e defendant, Joseph Clinton Robertson, from printing and awa . In the first plats, it gave him pleasure to observe , that not publishing a certain literary periodical work, called the Afcclianlea start In the statement of te Counsel opposite, and still less in the Magai.ine. The affidavits upon which this application rested, wore evidence which had been called to support that statement, had there extremely voluminous, and the points in dispute were matters of at. been any reason to preseme that the defendant had been actuated count, but the substance of the whole might be comprised in a very by any towards the plaintiffs; for not only had no witness brief statement. It appeared that, in the month of al ay, 1823, the de attempued to prove such a circumstance, but the Learned Counsel fendant was possessed of a certain perindical work, called the Me had, in his opening speech, distinctly stated that he had been at a ilianie's Moraine, of which he was the sole planner and prolific loss to conceive under what motive the words in question - had been tor--and that he entered into an agreement with Knight and uttered; a difacu ey which could never have presented itself to the Lacey (whose assignees the plaintiffs were) for the printing mind of the Learned Counsel, if he had had the slightest reason to and publishing of that work. lenight and Lacy undertaking to surmise that the defendant had been actuated by spite or reeentment, supply the necessary capital, the defendant to furnish all the matter Ile ("Jr. Williams) tsegeed not to be inisunderatood : he was not to be cont fined in the work, and that the profits should be equally urging so senseless a topic as to say, that if a man, under any cir- divided between them. There w by the as a written parties, agreemen an t to the dditional same euenstances, circulated expressions which were calculated to do in. effect, subsequently executed with a jury to another, he was not liable to the party who might receive covenant, by which Knight and Lacy undertook to pay to the de. injury from those expretudons. But, between a speech made with. fendant, Mr. Robertson, a sum of 231. on the first day of each out a motive, and Rope' ch made with the malignant design of ruin- month, " towards his share of the profits." It was also stipulatel fig the credit of a neighbour—between the inadvertent careless cir- that neither party was to sell, -assign, or otherwise dispose of, his in etilation of a report, without malicious intention, and the invention tercet in the publication, without the consent of the other, during mad circulation of a report with the express design . of gratifying the continuance of the connexion : moreover, the agreement was not private resentment—theta was all the difference in the world, to cease until six months after the date of any notice to that caeca ws it regarded the moral quality of die act, and there ought which either party might give to the other. Shortly after di: date of es be a very wide difference in the amount 'of damages award. this agreement, a conventation occurred between the parties, in which ed by a jury. The defendant in the present case, he admitted, , the defendant proposed to sell to the bankrupts his share of the pro had much better have been silent—he had better have spared fits arising from the work, for a tixtel sum of 001, a year, Knight and .the circulation of what he had beard ; but he (Mr. W.) put it to Lamy having the power reserved to theneof renewing the agree. them, whether it did not seem, from the evidence, that the de- mcnt for a further term of two or three years, a• the expiration of fendant, acting with the inadvertence of youth, had carelessly cit. the time then proposed, but it slid not appear that thus agreement culvert that which he had heard, but that his conduct had been had ever been ratified. In the year 11;25, the defendant, who had perfectly distinguisheble from a &sign to injure his neighbour. in the interim several money and bill transactions with the bank- He new invited the attention of the Jury to the distinction which rupts, on account of the abehaaites Magazine and other literary uppenrcel with respect to the language of the de fendant at the diffe- works, became, as they (Knight and Leery) alleged, their debtor rent heun in the day on which he had given utterance to the report. in a considerable sum • applied to them for an advance of 2aor., for apneared, that in the early part of the day the observation of the payment of which, and the sum of fidta. which Knight and tat defendant had been directly affirmative, that such and such an Lacey asserted he already owed them ; lie agreed to mortgage event had happened; but it appeared in evidence, that after Mr. to them all his interest anti property in the work in question. Gray had informed the defendant of what he had seen at the bank, The bankrupts having assented, a deed of assignment to this ard enutioned him agairst giving the report a further circulation, effect way accordingly (hewn up and duly executed; a clause in' then the expression of the defendant had been changed. and he had which bound the defendant to pay half a year's interest on the efterwards„ instead of making a positive allegation, merely stated whole sum (MOO at the rate of five per cent. per annum, on the circumstance as a report. Then, with respect to the damages ; the then next ensuing 18th of April, 11120, and the principel sum on the face of the declaration (in which the plaintiffs undertook to with the other half year's interest, that would have accrued due on estate the Injury which they had received), two persons were sped- the 18th of October following (next), and in default of such pay. fied. who, it was alleged, had wt . held their custom from the merits Knight and Lacey were to have a power of selling the defer. pininaffs. in consequence of the report circulated by the defendant. dart's Interest in the publication, to reimburse themselves for such That was the allegation. but not one:word of evidence had been aavances. By another clause both parties were bound over not to adduced in support of it. It was also alleged in the declaration, print CT publish any work . with the same title, or tending to the that • person of the name of Pattisun had called in a debt of 401. injury of the original publication. Under this agreement, the par sooner than he would have donetati it not been for the report in ties and their assignees continued to act until the sth June last. messtion. How had that allegation been supported in proof? when the defendant, Robertson, took the printing and aublishing of 'Why did he (Mr. W.) mention this? In order to show that it No. 146 of the work from the plaintiffs, and gave it to Mesita was a strong confirmation of what the witness Andrews had stated, Hunt and Clarke, in violation of his agreement. The ground atm• though persons of doubtful credit and auspicious substance upon which this step was attempted to be justified was, that the might have been affected by such a rumour, yet it had made no plaintiff's had failed to fulfil their part of the agreement, by with. impression (and he, Mr. W. rejoiced that it had not) on the firm holding from the defendant the sum of 25/., originally (in Sept. •sir el stable credit of the plaintiffs. That was a weighty eonsidera. 1824) stipulated to be paid him monthly, on account of his share lion, when they came to inquire into the damages to be awarded of profits ; but that agreement lie (Mr. Heald) would contend, hail against the defendant. The defendant, be wee aware, must pay been put an end to by the mortgage, for the defendant could not awe damages ; if he could not pay in purse, the law said that he claim the payment of that sum on account of the profits, on which .must pay in person—that was, that, if he could do no better, to Knight and Lacey (and through them their assignees) had a lien, gaol he must go, in order to repair to the plaintiffs a damage which until the mortgage eheuld have been paid off. If the plaintiffs had been purely imaginary. He (Mr. W.) feared that the de- (the assignees) had failed to fulfil any part of the agreement, an etsedant would fill into neither alternative. In purse he could net action would lie against them, but he submitted, the defendant had pay,—for whet compensation could a salaried clerk mike to the no right whatever to transfer the property in question to any other plaintiffs? and, in person, lie never would pay in this world, for poison. On the other side he contended, that six• months' notice •he was fast withdrawing Into another. It was, therefore, not idle should (by virtue of the cgrcemcnt of 1824) he given by either . pideelamatioa, or imaginary surmise, when he said that the de- natty to terminate the connexion. and that in fact such a notice ttr.dent would neither pay in purse nor person ; s.nd, as the de. had been given to the plaintiffs by the defendant. That a notice ,tondant was not able to pay damages, it was a matter of consolation had been given was true—but it bad only been served about three ftbst the plaintiffs did not stand in need of them. months since, so that even, under the agreement itself, the defend lit. Baron H L LOC summed up the case; and ant was not justified in transferring the publication from the The Jars , . after withdrawing fora shunt thee, returned a verdict plaintiffs before the expiration of six months, prescribed by the fur the plaintiffs-A/images, 30/. agreement. Under these circumstance., lie trusted his Honour wee id- grant the injunctien in the terms prayed for. Mr. BICKERST ET it, for the defendant. commenced by remark ing, that his Learned Friends had carefully kept out of view sonic very important facts connected w ith the case—facts which lie was sure, when they came to be known, would induce the Court to refuse the application just made. Ile fully admitted die agreement of 11124, but he contended that that part of it which bound Knight and Lacey to pay the defendant 251. per month, &c. had not been abrogated by the subsequent mortgage, for though, by the terms of that mortgage, the defendant was bound to pay the principal suns, together with a second half year's interest, the period will not arrive till the 111th day of October next. With respect to the mortgage deed, the defendant had sworn, that at the time of its being presented to him for signature he did not owe Knight and Lacey the sum of MOO/. as stated by them ' • for at that time many of the items included in the account consisted in the amount of bills accepted by them for the defendant, which were not then at maturity, which they had never paid, and for which he was still liable The defendant's affidavit further stated, that previous to his signing the deed, he mentioned to Mr. Walter (the at torney of and Lacey), that he was not indebted to them in the amount stated; to which Mr. Walter replied, that " it did not matter—that the covenant to whirl, he (Robertson) objected, was a thing of comae, by which he (defendant) could not be in jured." The defendant added, that he signed the deed without having consulted Isis law adviser, ignorant of its consequences, and that these facts had not been denied by Walter. The defendant fur ther went oii to swear, that he had not at any time a desire to depart from the strict letter of his contract, but that he had been coat. pelted to take the step alluded to in consequence of wilful act of the assignees, by their non.felfihnent of Knight and Limey's agreement. Ile stated in addition, that shortly after the plain. tiffs had been appointed assignees, they had refused to become re sponsible for-the printing of the work, being ignorant whether or not it would be productive of profit, which rendered it necessary for the defendant to give security to the printer for a certain period of titne. The plaintiffe, it was true, afterwards undertook to gua rantee the printer. yet they slid not pay to the sale of the work that atectit.on which i: required, in consequence of which the sale had been reduced front eight thousand numbers weekly, (which it had reached when the plaintiffs were chosen assignees of Knight and Lacey) to about half that amount. The defendant farther swore, that on the sth of' June last, he sent tothe plaintiffs the manuscript of No. 140, of tho Merhaniet Magazine, and that the same was tendered to them with a demand of 251., which had become due to hint, under the agreement of 1824. al ready referred to, with which demand the plaintiffs refused to com ply, on the ground that they had no funds. That, in consequence, he did, as charged, take away from the plaintiffs the publication of the work, but that he hail given to them repair notice. The persons to whom he had transferred the publication (Messrs. Hunt and Clarke) were to keep a particular account of the pro. cecds of the work, in order that an account should be fur nished to the plaintiffs, anti that they should be paid suclt share of the profits as they should appear to be entitled to. From these facts he (Mr. Bickersteth) trusted the Coact would see that the de fendant had done nothing that had not become absolutely necessary for the protec Mu of this; interests, which it could nut be denied he haul in the work; when, moreover, it should hr considered that the plaintiffs had gone on with the printing and publishing of a work with the same title ; that there were, in fact, two Mechanic.? Magee aces before the public, lie hoped the Court would be of opinion that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the injunction for which they prayed. Mr. HEALD, in reply, said that Mr. Walter was prepared to contradict that part of the defendant's affidavit which related to the execution of the mortgaged deed. The plaintiff's themselves denied that the sale of the work had been reduced from 8,000 to 4,000 numbers per week. IVlten they were appointed assignees they (Mind the weekly sale to be 6,000 number, at which amount it still continued. •• The Vi CE.COANC EL eon said, that looking at all that had been stated on the mat of the plaintiffs, it appeared to him that the de fendant)! intention laid been to act honestly in the fulfilment of his howev how LAW NOTICES. COURT 01, CHANCERY. TES LOS•SEANC LLLLL LITCOLN'S INN HALL, Trizs DAT, ♦T TEN. • Rematch! YAlons. • VICE-CRANCILLOWS COURT. MOSS MU LLLLL ,IX LINCOLN' , INN, TBI% DAY, AT ■ALV.PAST RealllSll2lMOtiOal, after which Cause Petitions. LAWINT'ILLICiENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, THURSDAY. JULY 27. fhe Loins CHANCELLOR observed, he should be obliged to hare the Court to-day at half-past one, to attend the Recorder's Report. His Lordship mid he had given so much of his attention rothe cases reported by the Recorder, as to disable him from giv. Lig any judgments this morning. CAPES V. HUTTON. In this cue Mr. KtetonT moved for an injunction on Vasil of thspluintiff, to restrain the defendant from acting comrary to the conditions contained in his articles of clerkship. It appeared that thl plaintiffs are attorneys practising at Epwortle, and the de fendant, who was articled to them, stipulated in his , articles that lie would not practise for his own beueht within less titan ten miles of Epworde. It appeared. however, that immediately after his weeks bad expired, and he had been duly admitted, he opened an ofice in Enu °rile. in opposition to his late masters. The present Didion was, iherefore, made for the purpose of restraining hint trinn acting contrary to his age. ement. In the moose of the case tits Lon° CHANCELLOR made several oust rations to the effect that he thought an attorney could not Utter into a contract to bind himself not to prude in any particular Placa. The LonD Cumecrtvoft desired to have the affidivits handed pp's° him, and said he would dispose of this ease on Saturday. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Tnunsmy, JULY 27. COPYRIGHT—" THE PULPIT." ,VICOV ANIt;;ID Ifl.ll V. DOBIL117601( AND ,IFAXI.EIIAAL. M r.ll EAI.D said, that in this ease he was Counsel for the plaintiffs, who are the assignees of Knight and Lacey, of Patermiattr-row, booksellers and publishers, and, on their behalf, applied to the (*vet for an injunction to restrain the defendant, Joseph Clinton Itoinrison, from asAgning disposition of, or exercising any right ettiatow to, a wcetly publication called The Pulpit, and for restroloing the defendant, Meildeliam. from publishing or selling est.! , iminhers of the same work, to do which he claimed a tide by 4idtoe of en assignment by the other defendant. The Learned Oen tioosna stated, in support of his application, that early in the year BM, the defendant Mr. Robertson conceived the idea of the penes:Mal work in question, and wrote, and caused to he printed and published, on and for his sole account, several Numbers of it. ' Ott the Stlith of May following, he disoostd of one-third of his pioaerty is this work to Knight and Leery, on account of their undertaktog its publication. Mr. Robert- Mr. HORNE hem interposed, a nd s a id his son, had so disposed e one-third of the profits arising from the pitbit:nti , m of The Poll* by the .plaintiflh, to whom the whole lenordsoion of each number .wu sent foe ante; but that Robertson Mai lICV. r relinquished his right to print the 'work. Mr. Herm° resumed- In fhe year 1824, Knight and Lacey be came purchasers of The Popit, and from that period down to the beenning of the prew:nt year, when they unfortunately failed to h tt ,:iness, they had enjoyed and *ltemised the right of ex altative proprietorship in the pebliestion. His clients, in the year Irtg4, ! stormed to give 111 r. Robertson bOL fur his copyright, isseion the defendant (Robertson) refused; but, by a letter, which doe Learned Counsel r ad, he expressed hie desire that Knight anti Loco; shookl lic:roine the purchaser*, offering the copyright, Att. Pr a sum of 1501. To these terms they agreed. There was ea dud of assignment. it was tree, but the bankrupt (Knight) perfect' the hare, and stated that ade:it or the THE BRITISH PRESS. POLICE. =Ma as It *as now made: but at the same time he Pinney re commended Mrs. Palmer to prefer hills of indictment agalost the Offending parties at the Sessions, both for the fraud and the assault, Ihlch Mrs. Palmer expresatd her determination to do. ROBBERY OF THE BIRMINGHAM COACH. BOWATREET.—testerday George Archer, alias Bartlett, anti James Foyle, were brought before Mr. HALLS, and underwent a very long examination, charged as acceisaries in the robbery of the Birmingham fast Coach in Anvil last, of a parcel containing n 35/. in Bank notes, the property of Messrs. Bolton and Watt, engineers. at Bitmingham. The circumstances of the robbery have been already detailed in the journal.' at the time of the examination. and subsequently upon the trial of Edward Archer, at the last Old Bailey Sessions, for stealing the parcel. Since he has been on board the hulks, in pursuance of his sentence, information has been obtained by Rutliven, the officer which led to the Meiling of warrants against tke prisoner, G. Archer, who is said to be the father of Edward, ' and of Fode„ who was at the time of the robbery a clerk i n the booking.office at the Spread Eagle in Gracechurch-street. They were examined ten days ago, and remanded until yester day. Archer was a stage coachman. Foyle is a very young man, and his connexions are extremely respectable. His brother and se veral gentlemen, his friends, were in attendance yesterday. Witnesses were called to prove the safe delivery of the parcel in qrestino, to the guard of the post-cost. at the booking-office in Gracechurch-street, and its sitheequent ahoraction from the coach lon the journey ; and Mr. harkman, the clerk, who delivered the parcel, and told the guard what it contained, swore that Foyle stood by at the time, and beard what wits said. It was next proved by winnows from the Dank of England, that on the 12th of April, the day after the robbery, the prisoner. George Archer, went fo the Bank and tendered 391)1. in notes. forming part of those stolen, and obtained sovereign"' for them. Mr. Kingston, one of the bank clerks, saw him upon that occasion for a consider able time, and swore rosilively to his person. He brought the notes Ina small bag. He also got cash for seven 01. notes. He gave, as his name and witen; " Toobe, Henley-upon-Thames." John Dortiegton, a fishmonger in Britannia-street. City-road, stated that just before the termination of the cod-fish season, which acids in Alay, he sold the prisoner Archer Rome cod-fish, which was tent by his desire to the King of Prussia, a neighbouring puldle.houic. The landlord refused to take it in at first, but did eventually. Witness knew the prisoner as Mr. Archer. Ales. Pugh, a butcher, proved the same fact with respect to some beef-steaks. A 1 r. Smith, the Inuellora of the King of Prussia, proved that Archer and another person dined together at his house in April last, upon cod-lief' and beefsteaks; and that Archer had a small dirty bag with hint. Ho could not identify the other man, if he were to see hint. lie recollected Archer, when he ordered the (timer, telling him (witness) that he was going to pay or receive money somewhere. and that he would come back and meet his friend to dinner, and did so. George Ruthren, the officer, deposed to his apprehending E. Archer, at Lewes, and seeing the prisoner George in the same them with Edward. On the 10th of July instant, the prisoner George was apprehended by Sedger, a patrol, and brought to wit ness at this office. Witness said," flow do you do, Mr-,Archer Feu did not expect to see me here so soon.' He replied, "My name is Bartlett, and tit Archer; witness said, " 0 yes, it is.— you remember being at Lewes when I took your son." He said in answer to this remark, that witness did not see him at Lewes. for lie was not there. On the 12th of July, witness apprehended the prisoner l'oyle, at Hull, in Yorkshire, where he was still in the employment 01, Mr. Chaplin, the coach proprietor, at his office there. Witness said he had come on very unpleasant business; that his name was Rutliven, from Bow-street; and that he came to take him for being concerned in the robbery of the parcel, for which young Archer had been convicted. He also told him that he had got old Archer in custody. He said be was quite prepared to Witness said to hitn, " I know all about it-1 know where yon received 200 sovereigns as your share from old Archer—it was at a public-house where you dined ;" to which he replied, " You must be a strange man to say 110." Witness said, he was quite sure lie was right, for that old Archer had shown an inclination to tell all about it. The prisoner said he knew nothing about it, and witness took him to the House of Correction. Ile expressed a wish to have his books sent to him, in order that he might make them up, and,witnese staid he would bring them. Witness went to his aparunents. where lie saw his wife, and she liCraled some books to him. Ile saw Alm. Foyle take a small book from a deck, and she was going towards the door with it, when he said, " Perhaps this is one which he wants," and attempted to take it from her. She held it very tight, until he said that he must have it, anti she then let it go, and buret into tears. In that book he found a letter, addressed " Ale. Archer, butcher, Plummer-street, • City-road." The following were the contents :—" Send word where Neil is gone, and tell George to write To me by the post, to be left-at the Cross Keys, Hull. There shall be a good berth for him when he comes on.—July lath." The letter had no signature, nor was it sealed. Ile also found a card on which the same address was written, with the addition of "By steam-packet—carriage paid." Mrs. Foyle wrote on a piece of paper as follows, and gave it to witness ;—" Tell all, I entreat you—it is only adding to your trouble to act falsely. Take care of your health. Get the money from Air. Searle and Mr. %Valk den, and Mr. Chaplin will, I um sure, act with mercy towards you. Write when you get to town." This paper witness took to the House of Correction, and read to Foyle; and the following morning lie, unsolicited, said to him, " It is the first time I ever did anything wrong ; I am very sorry, but that old rascal Archer came several times after me, and seduced me to it. He asked me if we did not carry a great deal of money at times? I told him yes; and lie asked me which coach carried most. I said we sent a good deal by the post. Several meetings took place before 1 knew what he meant, and when I did I shuddered at it, and have not known a happy moment since." He added, that when Archer first came to him he wanted a situation as coachman. Witness said, If 1 have been rightly informed, I know where you dined together when you received the 200 sovereigns." The prisoner ad mitted that witness was right, and said, that after he had received the money lion Archer, the landlord, Swath, was invited in to dinner. Archer carried the money in a bag. Witness asked him what he had done with the money, and lie said he had laid it out in purchasing a coach and tome horses for Mr. Walktlen. Wit ness recollected having seen him band a pocket-book to his wife, and he went back to the house to search, but could not find it. Ile asked the prisoner if he had any money, and he said he had, and that it was in his pocket-book, which lie said was in a secret drawer in his room. Witness found it there, and found In it 1351. in Bank-notes. In the course of the journey to London the prisoner remarked that lie was without money; upon which wit ness said, that probebly, upon .application to the Magistrate, lie would have the 1311. given up to him. Ile replied. " No, 1 don't want P. It is Air. Chadin'e money, let him have it," This was the whole of the evidence ; and Alr. BUTLER, for the prosecution, prayed for the committal of both the prisoners for trial, Foyle as an accessary before, and Archer after the fact. Air. HUMPIIIRIES % for the prisoners, contended that there was not legal evidence against Foyle sufficient to warrant his committal, and spoke in strong wens of condemnation of the mode in which what was called a confession was obtained. Mr. Ilara.s was of opinion that the case must go to a Jury, and the prisoners were fully committed. The extuninatiou lasted the whole of the afternoon. BARKERS AND BITERS. IIeTTON-CAnnere.—Yesterday, Abraham Solomon., a mem ber of the Istaelitish fraternity, and Sarah Solomon.. his daughter, a pretty, though somewhat an Jewish lass, were brought before %1 . L. Roo Llis, Esq. charged with an assault of a %try aggravated nature. Airs. Palmer, a highly-respectable lady, residing at Wands worth, who was the complainant, stated that her son, who was at a boarding-school in Westminster, had a few days since played truant, and goon off on some childish excursion, in company with another lad of his own age, not more than ten or eleven ; and in order to supply themselves with pocket moniy, they agreed to dis pose of their clothes, and having applied- for advice on this im portant matter, in the very worst quarter. namely, to an itinerant Hebrew salesman, whorl% they hard call rig " Clo, do, old do," they were brought to the defendant's shop in riald.lane, where they were readily supplied with tattered apparel, in exchange for their new suits, receiving, by way of barter, a few shillings each, with a strict injunction not to tell their friends where this accomnriode tion hail been obtained. When the boys had spent their money, they were comPelled, of course, to return home ; and young Palmer confessed by whose instrumentality he became so metamorphosed. Complainant being determined rot to submit to so shameful an imposition on a child, immediately proceeded to the defen. dant's house, along with the boy, who pointed out Solomone, as the person to whim he hail sold the dollies, which were bought only a few days bets-re for 4/. 10s. and in lieu of which he had got only Gs. and an old suit not worth more than 4 s. or Is . at the lu men Itles. Palmer, being aware tf the persons with wham site had to deal, endeavoured to induce •them to return the clothes by the offer of a bribe, and told Solotnons that she would give a sove reign, at the same time returning the old clothes, thus leaving him a ditticeur of 14s. for his bargain. Soh:mons himself appeared in clined to acquiesce with this 'novo al, but after consulting with his daughtei, who appeared to be a genuine get m of the Sliylock fa mily, he determined not to abate one farthing of the price set upon them, 93 If sold to any indifferent purchaser. Airs. Palmer then remonstrated on the injustice of their conduct in purchasing from a child in the first instance, and the twofold injustice of refusing to return them to the parent of that child, after so fair an*offer of re muneration had been made. But the Jew was no less a biter than a barker. Ile protested that "he would not give up the do' without he got as rimer) monieh es they would bring." Mrs.• Pa lmer, at this time, had the boy's coat in her hand, and expressed her determination to take it away, and let them seek redress in a court of justice, if they thought proper. But unfortunately she did not recollect that she was then In Field-lane, the stronghold of the leraelitish tribe. The coat was wrested from her grasp, torn into ribbons before her face, and she was kicked, cuffed, and abused, until she sunk in a state of exhuustion in the street, and finally effected her escape by the aseletance of two or t hree men who hap - 11/145111 ,. 'time ROBBERY BY A SERVANT. 4111.110 n On olt - IlLET.—Yesterday two men. named Sprunt and Carty, the former a potter to 31essts.II ilton, wine-merchants, the other charged IN an accomplice. were brought to the office for stealing thirty-two wins-bottle and a hamper. Framis Hill, the callarman to lilessrs. Hilton, stated that he bad been 111 for the last few days, and was excused by his employers from attending the warehouse; that hie wife is a brace-maker, working for a shop in the neighbourhood. On Tuesday evening, his wife having some domestic concerns to attend to, asked him to take her work home for her, and in passing his master's hou'c lie saw a hamper given out by Spruen, the yorter, to a man who walked away with it. Having a suspicion that all was not correct, I he watched the. next evening, and at half-past six o'clock saw ('arty go into the warehouse, and in a short time after Spruen came to the door and looked about him ; after which Carty came out with 1111 a hamper on his shoulder, and went to a dealer in marine stores in I King.street, where he put down the hamper, and knocked at the door. \illness went up to him. asked him what he had in the basket, and gave hint into custody. Mr. Hilton Raid Spruen wan their porter, anti in consequence of the illness of Hill, the care of the warehouse had been entrusted to him. As no one lived in the house, the keys of the outer door were left with him, to make the place properly fast. Spruen was not authorised to dispose of any of the stock. Witness hod looked at the bottle store that morning, and could safely swear the bottles belonged to him. Of the hamper he could not speak KO positively, hut had no doubt thit• was his property also. As to the other pri mmer (Carty) he knew nothing of him: he was not employed on the premises, and had no authority to remove any bottles. A hat had been left in the warehouse, which he suspected to belong to Carty ; he knew it wan not Spru'en's. Lovegrove, the beadle, took the prisoners into custody. Carty told him he had the bottles of Messrs. Ililtnn, and had a receipt for the purchase • but on searching hint no such document was found. He picked up it hat in the warehouse, which he produced. The hat was placed on the head of Carty ; it fitted very well, and Carty owned it as his. Spruen made no defence. ( arty said he was a labouring man out of employ. Spruen told him lie had some empty bottles to sell, anti he thought there would be no harm if he made threepence per dozen by Ilia labour in aell. ing them. Spruen told him where to go. Ile thought the bottles belonced to the porter. lie wan to sell them and give Spruen the • money. The prisoners were both fully committed for trial, and Messrs. 'ton and Hill bound over to prosecute. AMBLING. Robert Macdonald and William Read, two servants out of plate, were brought iron - . St. James's watchliouse, for assaulting James putlvr, footman to Captain Barth, at present residing at Simmer's Hotel. Butler said he met the prisoners in the Cock public-house in Illarkct-street, St. James's. on Wednesday evening, where be played with them at bsgatelle and won a shilling. About twenty minutes after ten he left the h ouse, followed by the prisoners ; and after some dispute aboutthe fairness of the game, they both as saulted him, first one and then the other. Ile called the watch, and gave them in charge. Air. ROE desired that Smith, the landlord of the pablic.house, might be sent for, to lay an information against him for suffering gambling in his hots e. - In a short time Smith came. Mr. ROE asked him if he would have the case heard then, or have an information laid against hint Smith chose to have the case heard then. He had been convicted twice within six months for keeping late hours. The prisoners were brought from the bar to give evidence of the gambling. Smith said that he did not know that a bagatelle board made him liable. Whenever he found any playing for money, he tock away the balls. Persons would come in ut times and play for liquor. Ile did not serve them on Vi'ednesday evening, and did not know they were playing. His wife and servant went into the room. Mr. Ron told Smith he was answerable for the acts Of his ser vants. Lie kept the hour.., anti had no business to suffer gambling. Here were two men brought to the rifle.° for rioting in the street, through his permitting gambling, and another hindered of going on his master's business. lie could rot plead as an excuse that he did not know they were servants. Capt. Oarth's footman had livery buttons, therefore he could not be mistaken. Smith was fined 3L Mr. ItoE off...red to Huller for the other two to go out with him and mate up their business. This the fuounan refused, and Mr. Roe discharged them altogether. JOHNSON'S INFORMATIONS. Two informations by this well.known character were yesterday dismissed, and the Informer saddled with the expenses. One information was against Mrs. ittifehrit, the owner of a Turnham.green stage, for carrying eight outside passengers, all of them above eight years old. Johnson's witness swore that the youngest passenger was a lad about 14 or 15 years old, seated on the conch-box. John Knight, the driver, said he took un the child of Mr. Clark in St. Paul's Churchyard, to give him a lift to a friend's at Turn ham.green, and put hint inside. When he got to the Spotted Dog in the Strand, tour ladies wanted inside places, and he removed the child to the coach-bus, placing him between himself sod an outside passenger, as he was too young to sit by himself. lie had no other lad that stage. The father of tot child attended to prove the age of his son, who, he said, would be eight years old next Michaelmas. Johnson inquired the dress of the boy. Snuff-coloured clothes, a straw hat, and black silk neckerchief. He admitted that to be correct, and the information was consequently dismissed. The other was an information against fleorge and Ambrose Wallace, proprietors of a Fulham stage, for carrying outside lug gage, contrary to the 511th rho. 111. Some of these stages are made with a boot before and another behind, in which case they must not carry outside luggage, or else fewer passengers. This stage, and many like it, has no boot be ' hind • and the question was, whether luggage put on the foot , board of the dickey conies within the nieaniug of the clause imposing a penalty for carrying outside luggage. In this case a passenger had a small bus of glass , which he said he carried in ' his lap. Johnson's witness swore it was on the place where the feet rest, therefore could not be said to be in the boot, and was outside luggage. Mr. George Wallace maintained that it was an open boot, and produced a very accurate model of the coach and horses. Under the peculiar circumstances of the case, Mr. ROE dismissed the information. There was a material variation as to the size of the box. MR. POOLE AND MR. ELLISTON. Utrtow-ll Al.L.—Yesterday Mr. EUision attended at this office, having just arrived from the country, in pursuance of the notice left at his house by Glannon, the officer, to answer an alleged as sault committed on the person of Mr. Poole, on the night of Fri day last, in Vauxhall gardens. Mr. Poole, it appeared, had been engaged the whole of the morning at the Sessions House. pre ferring his bill of indictment before the Grand Jury against the de fendant. When, however, he heard that Mr. Elliston was in at tendance at this office, he repaired thither immediately, where it was decided by the Magistrate (M. Swabey, Esq.) that the corn plaint should be heard, notwithstanding the procee din g s that had been instituted elsewhere. The motive then took their stations in the place allotted for com plainants and defendants. Mr. Elision commenced an apology to the Magistrate, accounting for his unavoidable absence from town when the warrant was granted against him on the complaint of Mr. Poole, in the course of which lie stated that several absurd para graphs had appeared In the newspapers of what had occurred a few nights ago at Vauxhall-gardens, all of which were exagge rated. and lie could only account for this circumstance by the knowledge he had of the, very considerable influence Mr. Poole possessed over the press. Mr. Poole smiled at the latter part of the observation used by Mr. Elliston, and said that he was not at all aware of his having such mighty influence with the press as had been just insinuated. Whether it was the case or not, he could most positively and con atientiously declare, that he had not written any paragraphs on the *abject at present under investigation himself, and he also dis claimed any knowledge of the person by whom they were written, or the manner in which they obtained insertion. The AIAOISTRATE observed, that he had nothing whatever to do with what had appeared in the newspapers on the subject. His -duty was to hear the circumstances of the alleged assault, and to bold the defendant to bail if necessary. Mr. Poole then proceeded to detail all the facts of the assault committed upon him by the defendant, as they have already ap peared. Mr. SwartrY—You will make oath, Mr. Poole, that Mr. El liston attacked you in the first instance? Mr. Poole--Certainly he did. Mr. SWABEY—Ind that previous to the assault no ill language was resorted to on your part to excite Mr. Elliston to commit a breach of the peace ? Mr. Poole—None whatever. lam not conscious of having given him the slightest provocation. So far from that being the case, I was not aware of his being in the Gardens, or indeed in London, until he darted upon me on the night in question, and committed the unfair assault upon me. The :Magistrate, addressing Mr. Elliston, said, that if he had any thing to cffer in justification of the complaint just made against him he should be happy to hear it. Perhaps it would be the better way to refrain from entering into any defence in the present stage of the business, mid merely put in bail to answer the charge at the Sessions. Mr. Elliston thanked the Magistrate for his !ingestion, and said that he should wish to reserve his defence until the case came be fore a Jury. He now availed himself, :however, of alluding to a • ' circulated r . _ • - • ti -al 4 tl to ft 13 to ni fa tt of a is 11 P 0 a t. 6 or it. L• Qt 1m I 111, 411 re, Lb- V ht. up rs- Ale 111 L o,t or • 1 1 to Ja the ti On 3 two de- er pro' 41'1 1 1 100 • , e'a. ni to ii ,I , e • tit: ti ; 7. It 11 1 4 . II a 11 a 11 o, Or . 74 t 7; l.t . re. by cf , ril, re. EF ntr ni 111, At a hurry that he had totally forgotten to provide himself with ak a' was now reqinted. Mr. Swant:y then asked Mr. Poole whether he had any m ute. tion that the defendant should give his own seen:Ay for hi. appear. ance at the Sessions, as he bad no friends protein to become his bail. Mr. Poole expressed himself perfectly satisfied with any eugget. Lion of the Magtat:ate. At this period of the husi-tens, Mr. Ware, a anneitnr re a idi eß in the Borough, entered the office, and immediately proffered his see , i vices to become bail for Mr. Elliston, remarking, that he had no [ personal acquaintance with that Gentleman, but that he &bawd I feel happy in rendering him a service, in consequence of Midi,. 1 tinguislud talent, and the amusement and gratiheation he had d e . rived iit witnessing his performance:. Mr. Einstein made a most profound bow to the Gentleman elm had pronounced so high an encomium on his theatrical talent' , and I thanked him for his politeness in offering to become his h a il. Mr. Poole here expressed a hope that the detendLnt would set traverse the case until the next Sessions. Mr. Staples, the Chief Clerk, Intimated that the ease, in all p m. 1 bahility, would be traversed, u it was necessary a certai n nna bet i of days should elapse from the commival of the as,attlt until the ensuing Sessions. In the present instance only a few days hat transpired from the complaint against Mr. Elision being mad e „ Iti the commencement of the Sessions. . . . —„ Mr. ElHilton said that he should rather prefer removing the e lk into a superior Court at once. The Magistrate then bound over Mr. Ware in tha sum of tut. and Mr. Elliston in his own recognizance the sum of 401, for In s appearance at the Session.. RECORDER'S REPORT. At the Privy Council held yesterday, the Recorder of London made his report to the King of the prisoners lying under sentence of death in the gaol of Newgate; namelr—James Crawford, aged 17; Joseph Baker, 19; Ellett Walker, 37: and Mary Ana Pray, 117—for house-breaking. Henry Smith, 22; Jams a Martin, 22: Maria Myers, 57; and George Leslie, I7—for stealing in a Ott ling.house to the value of 40s. and upwards. John Fordham, 21; William Clark, 40; Meilen' Mansfield, 21 ; and John Lawler, 20—for hurglary. Patrick Ryan, 11; Thomas Abraham., 22; and James Reid, 20—for highway robbery. Charles Butcher, 27 —for sheep-stealing. William Waller, 20 ; Thomas Wiskin, 22 ; and William Toffs, 21—for horse-stealing. Thomas Miles, 32 ! for coining. %'hen his Majesty was graciously pleased to respite during Ids Royal pleasure all the said prisoners, excepting Charles j Butcher and John Fordham, upon whom the law is to take its course—Butcher being ordered for execution on AVednestlay neat, and Fonlham on the Monday following, the 7th August. SHIPPING INTELLIGENCE. LIVERPOOL, WEDNESDAY, JU LY 2G. Arrived the Naiade, Lionhardt, from Marie. The Wellington, Brost , from Liverpool fo: Riga, is on shore near Drago, and has taken assistance. The Jason, Scales, front Ilambergh, and Susanna, Graham, front Havre, tor Liverpool, has arrived at Milford. The Bowes, Brag, from Liverpool fur Newfuundland,has arrived at Quebec. The Sarah and Mary Ann, Christian, from Liverpool, has ar rived at Quebec. The Integrity, Milton, from Liverpool for Quebec, was spoke, 14th June, off Bird Isles. The Isabella, M`Donald, from Liverpool and Newfoundland, has arrived at 31iramichi. _ —•. HOLYHEAD, JULY 25. The Oxford, Dawson, from hence for St. John's, \. B. sailed this morning. Re/liana) the Liverpool, Ross, from Liverpool lot the Baltic, put in leaky. CUSTOM HOUSE. JOLT 26. Ex r r nvo OUTWARDS.—Prince of Saxe Coburg, Ladd, front Rotterdam ; Catherina Margaretha, .farn, from Touningen ; Hoff. nung,Eggen, from Ifeligenhafen ; Christine, Reents.from Homier. Biel; Louise ulie, Schunman,from Wolgast ; Blise,Bandelm, from Dantzic; Kleine Klass, Tyarts, from Doornzeyl ; Endraght, Nie veen,from Groningen ; Gute Hofnung,Sanders,from Emden ; Ett; Maria, Ilorohers, from Innhaum rsiel ; Vrouw Bouwina, Dekker. fromOroningen ; Providence.Sims.from Datitzic ; A nn,Richardsoo, from Hamburgh ; Emilic,'Vander Kerck hove, ttorn Ghent ; Vwev Jannetje, Roose,from Antwerp; Fame. Hatfield, from flamburah ; Ajax, If ofker, from Leer ; Vronw Gesina, Ostetloo, front do.; alien Lidia, Brine, from Linden : Orwell, Cuhitt, from Harlin. gee, ; Fame, Barfield, from do. ; :Magnet, Watkins, from m. Petersburch ; and Sir David Ogilby, Savage, from Limerick. ExvEn Era OtrvwanDs.—Margaret, Patterson, tor 'Nita; Hilton Jollifte, Alowell, for Hamburgh ; Ruby, Corneby, for Lisbon ; Glory, Frost, for Rotterdam ; Thomas King, Willinre• son, for Madras and Demerara ; and Spring, Bayne, for late Mau ritius, Mocha, Bombay, Tellich, and (,olom. CLEARED OUTRARDs.—Swift, Artie, for Malaga and Smyma: Nile, Stokes, for Trieste and Venice; Atalanta, Tate, for at. Thomas's and St. Lucia; Betsey, Fox, for Hamburg!) ; Dorotla, Trodden, fur Elsinore and Copei.hagen ; Eliza, Minter, fur Koitg dam ; Ilendrika, Net, for Antwerp ; and Ruby, Ilowle, for Su- Lander and Havannah. FALMOUTH, JULY 25.—A nived the Kingfisher packer, from the Mediterranean; sailed from Corfu 3i June, Malta Coe 14th, Gibraltar 30th, Cadiz 3d inst. ; the Treasury yacht, Fart, front Portsmouth for Newfoundland ; and the Norway brig Four Sisters, Balmy, from Dram.—Wind N. PORTSMOUTH, JULY 26.—The Phenix, Anderson, for Dub lin and New South Wales, which sailed yesterday, is still in sight. Sailed the Alfred, Meads, for Guernsey, and his Majesty's ►fup Hightiyer, on a cruise.—Va►iable light airs. DEAL. Jur."' 26.—Arrived the HopzWell. Dobson, front Mira miebi ; the John, of Scarbro'. from the Baltic. Sailed the Cambria, Robinson, for Philadelphia.—Wind N.E. by E. JERSEY, JULY 21.—The mass, yards, standing rigging. and part of the hull, of the Thetis, Lempriere, have been bruni;ht oa shore. PARIS, JU LY 21.—The Courtier d'ilaiti, Laconture, from For. deaux, was run upon a rock a: Cayenne, May 19, and bilged. Val of the cargo saved. GIBRALTAR, JULY s.—The Union, Sensot, from Batcelons to St. Andero, was taken 27th alt. about 100 miles oil' Vigo. by the Trinidada, Colombian privateer, and the master and a boy put on board the Jane, arrived here from Newcastle. SMYRNA, JUNE 20.—His Majesty's ship Cambrian arrived two days ago from the Archipelago and 'Napoli di Romania. She de stroyed, during her last anise, about 20 boats and small vessels, suspected of piracy. His Majesty's skip Cambrian, Se:ingapatam, Rose, Medina, and Gannett, are in port. MALTA, JUNE 11.—The Squid. Warren, which sailed 6 , h lest. for Gibraltar, put back the 9th, having sprung a leak, but will pro , teed in a few days. The Adventure, Harris, from Liverpool for Coleraine, was lost 20th inst. off the latter port, Crew saved. EAST INDIA SHIPPING. The Comet, Dutch corvette, has arrived off Dover from Baily'a. Snips SPOREN wITH.—The Orpheus, Duff, from London t' New South Wales; and the Mariner, Halsey, from London to ,be Cape, were spoken with the 27th May, within two day's sail of t h e Line. MEETINGS* OF CREDITORS. LONDON LlST.—[From the London Gazette.] AT TRU COURT Of COMMINSIONSRS OF BANKRUPTS, SASINGUALI , STREET, ON MONDAY NEXT. &Midge, It. Weedon Deck, plumber, to defend An actions . ..... • • COUNTRY LIST. Burrell. It. jun. Wakefield, mer. at Sessions-b. Wakefield, '2d exam. 11 Cavenagh and Co. Bath and Bristol, bankers, at York-h. Bath, div. ll Coombs, .1. Arelford, victualler. at Omar. Arms, Shartavhary, Ist ex. 11 Cowper, B. Oldham, cotton-spinner, at Star, Manchester. lot Ferguson, J. Catterlck, scrivener, at George , Catt erick . s p l.all I Garside, .1. Manchester, cotton-spinner, at Star, Manchester, Ist as. Hartley, W. Sheffield, provision-dealer, at Star, Manche.. adj. It. ex. II Heathtield, M., It., & T., tihef. & Tiverton, cut.... Star, Man. f. div. I Jones, W. Yedril, grocer, at George, Ilminster, 2d .... • • • • Old, J. Bridgwater, Innkeeper, at Messrs. Boys. artftwatee, exceutios 11 Petty, G. Bait - try, maltster, at Alessrs. Ilawkaleys, Hawtry, pf. debts I 4 Pigott, W. Norwich, grocer, at Swan, Norwich , ad j . last cram... ' Matron, T. Holywell, Flint, Taper-maker, at Star, Manchester, Mr. 1 JIIRTI'S. On Monday, the 21th inst., the Lady Charlotte Calthorpc, of a son. On ete 24th inst., at Culverthorpe, Lincolnshire, the Hon. Mrs. Henry liandlcy, of a daughter. On the 26th inst., at Burton.street, Burton.crescent, the lady of Charles Schultz, Esq. Private Secretary to 11. I. and R. H. t Grand Duchess Anne Pavlovna, Princess at Orange, of a son. - MARRIED. On Monday, the 24:h inst., at St. beat's. Huntingdonshire. by George Rowley, D.D., Master of University Conege, Oxf George Lyeke. Eng. to Catherine, daughter of the lte (1%,1ey Rowley, Eng. of the Priory, near St. Neot'n, Huntingdoanshire. DIED. On the 2fith last. at his residence, Mill-hill, Thos. Clark, EF in the A ear of his age, one of the Magistrates of the county ei Middles Vex, y and late of the fi rm of Clark. Lloyd, and Frenth, Skinner-street. At Lambeth, on thc 23d inst., Jonathan Young, Esq. in the 04th year of his age, after a lorg and severe illness. At Tuiliebol Home, Kinrosa.shire. Lady 31onetelff wite of the Rev . Sir Henry Moncreiff Wellwectd, Baronet, of Tul liebnle. To her family an irreparable loss, and to all who knev her an object of veneration and love, this excellent woman elietd • long life of the most active and u nwearied benevolence, by a death of Christian resignation, faith, and hope. hi+house , at North Britton, in tte • - att.Vr a sum or taut. a o ,„„., „„„.., ......, _„,___ _ _ awed h , so deed of assignment. it was tree, but the bankrupt (Knight) iiTt e D art of the plaintinit, it appeareu to 111111 1114 l 1 , n.: tic.. limit snc suns in a state lof &Wang 14 intention had heento set honestly in the fulfilment of his . purchase, and stated that a deb . effected her escape by the asaistance of two or three men who hap. that he should wish to reserve his defnee until the case came be. • long tile ot me most Renee a n.....-.......---______ • . aware to the perfect' m of the owe d a m e . R ea d ey . t a r part of the agreement of MA. The question was, however, how tab the defendant (Robertson) el i tin e wo rk, shrill() he ratisfied, paid, or guaranteed by them, tar he (Me. It nherlson) was justified in transferring the publication pened to be passing at the time. fore a Jury. He now availed himself, :however, of alluding to a of Christian resignation, faith, and hope. in tte There was su ffi cient evidence to sustain the charge of assault, vague report which had been circulated of his h a ving e mbarked for On Tuesday evening, at hiss house, at North Brixton , e , i of the work to Hunt and Clarke. To him (the Vice-Chance:kr) it wild n the - setto nd'n• of the parches mosey (one hundred and twenty and the purchase of the child's clothes was rot denied ; but the America immediately subsequent to the occurrence in Vauxhall MI year of his age, Robert , Esq. His death was tau-% 11 :i ; i p A, ) s h. all be pad in Mr. Robertson, as d which Knight and a b PPeed that that proceeding had been forced upon thg defendant Ilcbrews were more than a match fur the Gentiles. They ad- Gardens. " That is not the case," added he, " for lam now in by a cancer in the tongue, which had been forming Me !'"e . ; e g , n e y a .,,,tt tey so Maid him. In Inca of iteir exclusive owner- Y the entharrassueld to which he hail been reduced By the con. duct of the plaint,. . Iss but which conduct had arisen out of the initted all that could be alleged against them ; but took refuge attendance at this o ffi ce in propria persona." lie certainly intended years, and which he endured with the utmost fortitude% "' e r i • behind a oint of law, from which poshion they could not be dis. to leave England for Lisbon tor the benefit of his he a lth, and with Bell was well known in 6e literary world as the g dircl ar a altii the Le rned Goldman stated , that air. Robertson edited nature of the situation lii which the were laced. Under these cit. lodged, except ' .* I Mae 'Numb: r only of the work, after the bankrupts had be some the from its commencement in OM, . y P by their assailant assuming another point of attack. respect to his voyage to America, that would be undertaken at a " The Weekly Despatch,' . „.„,, l i a l ins•ances he could not grant the injunction prayed for, particularly 'cowards appointed as They contended that the complainant had been guilty of a trespass future period, for the purpose of relieving the embarrassments into as an active and valuable contributor to several other P . '" --- I , • t ) Il i 9' I; propeietors of it ; that they had immediately at' as Editor themselves , and continued, as lie had already stated, u . topublish it down to the period of t t h e , • heir•bankruptcy in 'ter which it was maul trly published for and on account of , the pi sirtilia; their as coon the plaintiffs had I . i taken the law into their own hands by the the pmene pu 'cation ut the work on their own accoutit.—Motion refused. -. _ . _ in having gone in on their ground, and argued that she was guilty which he had recently fallen. Nothing, however, should induce publications. of a felony in attempting to seize the property without legal au- him to quit this country until the charge exhibited against hint was •=_._ [Lori p. investigated, as he considered that he had received provocation of sh.me..—matters re mained in t hi s sta t e unt il fu a N.ou T.—The workmen of several trades in Dublin Mr. ROGERS, however much he felt inclined to condemn the de. the most gross nature from Mr. Poole. the 113. k had reached i.a 167th n umber, on the .2,3 d of June II t2fi, - -- -- -- _ _ --- .._....._---•••••!-' RtGll WATT'S THIS DST AT LONDON Bllttfloll._,_ 8 Morning .... .. It Wu: otter 81. taveing......,. 411 wita• " —••••••—••••••...........___--- have turned out tOr payment o their wages in English money ; fondant ' s first and last acts—the first for purchasing from a child The Magistrate asked Mr. Llliston whether he was prepared ___ . _ --- ~ lei h" wit a these appeared enotht r Peapg in the literary world, the that ISt they require that the mum who rieeives twenty shillinga of such tender years, and the last for assaulting the parent of that with bail. exact copies of the ltidt per week, stall now receive twenty shillings English , child—was nevertheless obliged to admit that the charge was unte• Mr. Ellieton replied that he hal come away from home in such Primed at THE BRITISH PRESS Oftee, by J. W. CARLT9N. go• Strand, and published by It. CANNON, same piece. i: itiminimmiwiim...i..............i...imning j i nioin'aes (MO titk, and imprint of which i'ere . , . o , .1' .. . % gi . . . I