The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1809-12-01 00:00:00

--- PANTHEON mitsQuErm nE. On Wednesday evenia t i , a grand masquerade took place at the Pantheon, which wee attended by near 400 persona. comprising many of rank and fashion. The grand saloon was most superbly lighted with variegated lumps, iu various devices. Most excellent hands of music were provided, and ertry arrangement made, that could tend to' the main-it-meat of the visitors. Al.out elesso o'crock, the company b egan to usepr o lile ; tlo-y cionsistril of Harlequins, Culambines, ont of place, Ice. A groupe of Six f!ld Made attracted mueh no tice. They were much annoyed Ly a Son of Crispin, hitt they did nut appear to relish the acic s.tlt a which his wit ass wassoned. There were ako ney-sweepers, Witches, Yorkshirenros, wail ail excel lent Cherokee, who sported an 0. I'.-medal, and ,eoliuded the war-whoop moat musically. At one o'clock, the supper-iooms were thrown open, and *displayed profusions of good fare. The wines were loseellent, and the whole entertainment did great reedit to the exertions and taste of Mr. Wand, the eopriator. 11:MH PE/MANTRY. +COE AUTltort oF " yr rocaMsooa," To Tin 'Lot ion ne " Tor: Bur rrsa UN Tlia STATE OF IHt mita FetaaN IRV. " insists hwitiptant retinentur diu. - -watinsen. these times, ve.len tn, Mande worti tithes 'Sway all uutisideration of ark other, when 44,,s sw.ilowed up Ilonaparte, and the aptlerungs of Fun-ore, and our own more immediate burdens and are lost to the contemp!ation of the fate of the .New Theatre, it is scarcely to ne expected, that Cie misery of the poor peasantry of Leland, which ' haw increased, is increasing, and ought uo las di. niiisherl," can hope to attract all the autentien it dpscrers: that the attempt, however, shall be made; I know it will be as agreeable to your nature. 7UI t is imperative on your duty, to promulgate the facts which I shell lay before you. The Et , gltsh and Scotch know nothing of the state of flies Irish peasantry, and the book, which I am about to quote, is far too costly to be couch circulated, or ivied. Sir Jonah Barrington, one of H is Majesty's Counsel at Law. Judge or the Hugh Court of Admiralty of Ireland, 14c. has just pub lished, iu quarto. Part the First of a work. entitled " Historic ctncetlotes, end Secret Memoirs, of the Legislative Vision," which part contains very little letter-press, and Its price is one guinea, iti conse quence of halfo•doarn tine engravings, bv Heath, of Lords Cornwallis, Clare, Moira, ,Qr. 'the facts, therefore, which err there related, and which ought to lie InAsir 114 common as the sir we breathe, trt.e, as it were, .tifled in their birth-wit is, to the public at large, a sealed hook. ‘Vhat we want is a plain statement of the circumstances, in a popular form. as it relates to compass and expense. It is impos sible that such monstrous abuses could be suffered to prevail, if thee were thoroughly known on this situ,- • .1" tile water. Theextract subjoined is but a ape rimer' of the general oppress'on of that part of the population of irelnnd. But it is enough— .' Presetasg stones, *twotilst wake theta capable !" Sir John C.sirr, who had a maudlin lore-sick fit on him, during the time of his travels in Ireland, sued was a stranger there to all that lie ought to bare looked iiito, described sod exposed, told me tdrootiiiii. 4 but their gentle virtues. and " uariroPed feisty of heart ;" lied he unfolded such a tale as Sir has, his writings had made tne weep almost at much as they made me laugh. Your., Asc. THE. AuTooa or P. R. Nobs. 20. EXTRACT. " The Protestant t lergyinati generally lets his tithes to a proctor or farmer; the wealthy parish ioners rent their's from the pinetor, upon reasonable terms, . Inch prevents their interiereuce. The re maining tithes of the parish, being those of the peasants, are then advertised to be cooed (a sort of auctiop) at some ale-house : the bidding com mences at eight, frequently so late as eleven or twelve o'clock ; the proctor (and in some instances the rector) superintends the sale; each cottager's tithe is set up distinctly, and every bidder, accor. shod to the liberality of his advance, gets a , glass or two of strong whiskey. to encourage him : the cm tiger . * pride to purchase his own tithe increases with his inebriety ; puffers are introduced ; the sale raised; and, when the cottager is at length declar ed the buyer, a promissory note is drawn for him; he. being totally illiterate, puts his mark to it, and when he awakens nett day from his intoxication, he is informed of the nature of his purchase. This cant generally lasts several nights. The cottager not punctual) is then served with a law process, called a cici/ bill, for the amount of the note ; a decreer, with costs, of course, issues against him and the blanket (his children's covering) or the po tatoes (ins ee/yr food) are sold to pay the expenses of the proceeding. The attorney and proctor un &resod each other, the costs of recovering a erowa often exceeding it guinea ; amid the catholic permit, instead of a tenth, frequently yields up the whole' of his seimty, miserable crop, to support a pastor of the protestant estahlishment. "Linable either to beer or coooterart the owes. anon ot• tithe proctors, the beggared peasant he. coulee .1 is cooteuted, gradually riotous. and at Irligih desperate, •nt) the catastrophe generally cnoreltirles by the p4ristporiers rine:rally/ cattin , .r, the proctor's tars of, and the proctor (according to lore) banging the parishioners. "• varionsroodes of collecting ti 'lies i n Ireland of w!.Acti this is not the morsel are therefore 4 sills_ jest a t unworthy the inquiry of the legislature, or onortapied to the ditty of a Parliamentary Coin /111mi. : and the Right Honourable Secretary (4,landas) must have inure than common sagacity, if he 1.411 discover the (with disorders of a people, without Mquiring what ails them ?" or find a mode of setting their 1111114 at ease, by rendering them hopeless." . An shinning fire broke out at ten o'clock hist night, b•-ifir Shot.!writ. %% r state booth regret, thnt the brave defenders or Geroula are reduced to the groateot extremity, According to letters from l'Arriigoo4 of the 4th, they weir s o •arniehtruni for vorision.4, am to have hero oldsgsd for some rts)s poet miti, i( to tattooist too n, nice sod horses. Theoe vonsuined, there WU atternatire but to surrender. r LAW INT.ELLICENCE. C3VRT 01 KING'S BENCH, GUILD...ALL, Roe. 30. Settings at Nisi Prim:, before Lord Eusat- Bonin 4U ••••••••••• CONNOR V. J AMC& This was an 'tenon brought to recover the price of a horse and cart, which were destroyed by the neglect of the Defendant's serra'it. Mr. PAUL stated, that his client, the Plaintiff, was a dustman, and the Deft-adant a merchant of respectability in the city. He then related :lie evi dence, and said, that if his witnesses preßed the case, according to his instructions, the Jury Inca give a verdict for the Plaintiff, aho only we'd fur seventeen pounds. William Durridge deposed, that, in the month of February hart, he saw the Defendant's ser van t _riv ing his chaise-cart through Slmreditch, going to wards London; that he attempted to drive the horse between a waggon and a brick cart ; the cart chaise got entangled between them, there not bring room for it to pass. The shafts were broken, the horse, being frightened, ran away at full speed, carrying with hint one of the shafts and a footstep. The accident was caused by the cervanes attempt ing to drive between the waggon and the brick cart, where there was nut room fur Min to pale through. Willi a m Whit e deposed, he was standing by the side of the Plaintiff's horse and cart, at the corner of Halloway-lane, Shoreditcli, when his saw the De fendant's horse coming at full speed ; he ran with his breast against the shaft of the Plaintiff, which bloke, and ran through him, arid he immediately expired. The curt, from the chock, tilted up, and the Plaintiff's horst war suspended by the reek and nearly strangled ; he died in three days afterwards. He was worth 011/0111 101. and it would cult ilbout 31. to repair the dust-cart. Mr. ti•itanw, in defence, observed, that the De fendant's horse was a spirited animal, which cost 140 guineas ; it took fright, and ran away vials the servant, long before the chaise-cart Caine in con tact with the waqvin and the brick cart, in which case there cool.' lie no neglect on the part of the servant ; he is.aild prove that he did every thing in his power to restrain the horse; the Defendant was sittErient laser .n ready, his horse having been killed ; he would tell them what was the meaning of the story told to them that day; fur, could it be believed. that a !weer being held up by the head for two 'inflates, would cause his d e ath? no; but it was to save the Defendant's horse froth go ing a hunting, a term well known to dustmen; not Odd h.' Arab to follow the hounds, hut that he was to be carried to them. He concluded by observing, there 1..47. not that kind of evidence before the Jury upon which they wouldhe justified in giving a verinct fur the Plaintiff ; he would prove there secs 110 tie glect in the case, and the Defendant would be en titled to their verdict. henry Collins, the Defendant's servant. who drove the horse after being released, deposed, that. as he got opposite to the front of Snote(!itto church, thehorse ran away with him and cart ; he could not pull :.iin in or inminge inns that he rushed between ti..en and the brick cart ; there was not room between them ; and if he had been able to manage the horse, he would have prevented his going ; the witness was in danger of having lost his life. Lord Et.z.ssaottouosi—.4 Were you accustomed to drive ?" I. I war., my Lord ; I had been in the custom of driving for eight years before." Lord Et.t.etraoitome•—.. Did you use your best efforts to prevent the accident " I did, my Lord." Lord F.l.LFNilormean—.. This pats an end to the Plaintiff 'a case. The declaration states the cause of action to be, the neglect of the Defendant's servant, and it is in evidence that he used all due diligence to prevent the injury that has been sus tained. Let • Juror be witisdrawsi."—Which was accordingly done. WAILDEL D. VERMEIL This was an action broeght to recover 8001. on a conditional grant given by the Defendant to the Ptaintiff, and made payable three months after the death of the Defeudant. There was but one sub scribing witness to the bond, and he could not be brought forward, he having absconded, a prosecu tion fora felonious act having heco commenced against him. The question was left to the Court to decide, whether secondary evidence, in such a case, would not answer Lord EI.I:ENDOROUGII-.." It is a kind of evi dence that I should be always tenacious of, afraid of encouraging fraud, as it might ilidoes.persons to send attesting witnesses out of the way, and by saying they had absconded, gain the point of hav ing the svitueba's writing proved. There appears something in this case, which warrants some indul gence. If you prone that proper search has been made after the witness, and that it is positively as certained that' he has obsconded, you may proceed by preying his writing." Sufficient testimony having been given, to con vince hi. Lordship of the fact. The Plaintiff was allowed to prove the execution of the bond, by proving the attesting witoess's hand writing. The Jury (ow a verdict fur the Plaintiff, under the direction of the Court. MAYWOOtO V. PIP?!. The A TTOIIN t7-(iVtltlta 1, stated, this was an action to recover MI. the ainnunt of a Bill of Ex change. accepted by the Defendant; hie would prove tho acceptance, and the Jury must giva a verdict for the Plaintiff. John Crrft proved that the acceptance was the Defendant's writing. Mr. GARIIIWIT—" I will put an end ti ; the Bill of Exchange as cn a two-shilling. instead of a four-shilling stomp, d'l WWI account your Lordship knows the Plaintiff must be non vuited." Mr. ATTORNET-GeSellat.—" I will maintain the action. and the other counts in the ind.ct went?' William Haywood, the son of the Pl • 'IF, was examined, but he acktiowled;ed that Ile was the Plaintiff's partner, un which his evidence ccul.l not he received. The Plaiatiff was non-suited.' . , Ik./LL 0. JAMES 'Witten, all trldni . • fifatit . t b i toiret. to Solomon, and the acknowledg. Mr. rillitßOW stated, this was an actioiti reed. Warn to blot of Li, contract. ver IDOL the amount of a bill of triici,e; he -- The Joey returned a verdict for the Defeedant. • would prove the acceptance, after which, he'conl4l • -- IttniTON a. ARCHER. not roaceire what defence . ,cotlld be se op, Tiiia'nfri"aii ammo for an assault. Mr. Se r j ean t it Itad been sail. that the Pthntiff, in some crlinver- 13).1c0"stryd, npon the part of the Plaiutiff, that it m sat to said, m , that orn was , wonli 10. per cell; iu - Mem na led Lingar, oho had died ibuat tan terest, The Plaintiff was itpartner in the house of bad 1,;,,,,t05i, tip! Plsintiff. Messrs. Calvert and Co. brewers: the Defendant's his executor, not wishing to leave hi. properly son kept a public-house; he applied to the,: at the dispond of Ins wife,whoa: lie did tiff to lend him 1001. for twelve months, which, hie oa t tit tgine was capable of so much natural affec said, ha would do, if the son got his father, the I tion as to remit in any r%trovagance. or deny her- Defendant, to give his hill fur it. The hdl was oh- self airy enjoyment, how. , :er set viceahle it might be tamed, and the Plisiutill paid dow.s 1001, and he to her cliiitheo.. indeed, if we were to judge of was now Ohitged to bring Ins retinal for it. repay- her fondness, at a router, trans the instance she meat, The Learned Counsel then called • wet-' wee gave of her fondness as a vile, we have no rep lies., who proved the Defenclaot's acceptance, and sou to accuse the husband of want uf iuggvaity iu this also the drawees, Jaaies Wilson, jou. ' supposition, for in tai 'att-r his decease the Xr.Arroarr s.n-Ge.trartar„in defence, silted, that wi d ow married a man Kit .: hiag. This Kitch ifilis instroctions were right, he would prove nsury coinuseitced his au thn.i t 3 as aI. :.band, iintne in this case, which would for ever debar the Plain- diateiy, by receiving the ren:s. The Plaintiff, as tiff from recovering. Ile would not take up the adimuistrut. rto iirs deceased friend, consulting the time of the Court wad J ury, but go to the proof at interest of the children, set.. notice to the truants once. not to pay their rents to smy person but himself ; James Wilson, jun. deposed, that he had kept a the Defendant, assorgst the lest, received a notice, public-house, and that the Plaiotiff lent him 1001. -notwithstanding which he paid his last quarter's for twelve months, on the joint security o f hi m mi d rent to Kitchitig , to the amouut of 41. 10s. O u th e his father, the Defeudant. The Plaintiff did this Ithii October the Plaintiff went to the house of the to indneti the redoes* to get his beer from the house Defetnlent, for the purpose of distraining for she which lie was connected with. When he Caine! t o rent ; the Defendant not being sufficiently dis mssionate to be a r, is i:hout immediate resentment, give him the ro omy f or th e bill, h e sa id , t h at I wormy was 10 per cent. and that the Plaintiff, the conduct of the Plankton' upon this. occasioir s when he received the hundred pound*, Ite must te- seized him by the collar., and shook hire with great turn him, the. P 1 •ff, 51. and 'ii. the hill, whe n it violence. It was for this as , airlt that the l antana 'became due, would he 51. more, whi c h would I action was brought. Upon the part of the Defei, make the ten per erns. but that he must net it was proved that lie said , lie was willing io coin let his father, the Defendant, know, that be was• tAY, proviiirs lit was indemnified Iron, any future to pay more than lawful interest. The D e . chum. 'fife Plaintiff refused any other, thou see- • fendatit was present when the witness received .the gullet receipt, upon the Deleudent paid his 1001. in the Carolina Coffee-house, but the Phtlii- rent tr. Kit• which he thought himself fully tiff took the witness, in u few minutes afteraard., into another room, a n d demanded the 51. whichlie Mr. nit SuEpHraD, fur the D e f en d an t s gave hilts. •:u 1, that it v, as vary difficult for the Defendant to '''tl,ther than he did, under cirt , '314ta1;,c.11 of 'On his cross-examination by Mr. M inium , h e ' sied i 114 4 ravailoir and Injustice ; that ail* he nut in said, that hr br o k e , a b out t we l ve mont h s ago; never a Court of J would say, that th e liefeit.l- wits made n b an kr u pt o f ; t h at b e pa id t h e money mit adopted a n; ht mode of condo c t treatiug the he got from the Pl a i n ti f f, t o hi s , t h e w i tness ' s Plaintiff as he did, lie was positive the Jury con creditors ; that h e h a d ru i ne d hi s f at h er , w h o was a stdcred it in the same light ; and that, .1 they dud son. farmer, in the country, m o re th an any ot h er per give damages, they wo u ld give thew to the statue of ' the rile - led , Mr. Gsaaow, in reply, animadverts . on the ' conduct and the testimony of the last witness, and observed, that he acknowledged he had nearly ruined his father; and, by the trumped up story he had come forward with that day, wanted to save the Defendant (rum conipkte ruin, and f to cheat the plaintiff' «ut of his tool. iii hard cash ; such a story. be was sure, the Jury would not believe, when it wis unsupported by, other evidence. • Lord P.i.t.viooacitinii ' , eft it to the Jury whether they believed the testimony of Wilson, the witnemo,. or not? if they did, they must give x verdict for 'the; Ddeudant, if not, it must be for the Plain tiff, The Jury, without hesituvon, gave a verdict foe the Ea:Laid. _ _.. _ smallest current two of the realm. The Loan Cuter JUSTICIt Mum veil, that the conduct of the Plaintiff was that of a tittle 'no much severity. The Jury gave a verdict for the Plaintia—:`o. mages one farthing. WaLrof.ll e. Pitlltlea. Thlreras an action fur an an,ault, the eircu. - - stances of which were net very interesting. .I •'• Plaintiff resided with his brother, at the Ile.- cules, in Leadeuhall-street. The Defendant was a p"rter at the Swan public house in the same street ; they quarrelled about a parcel, which was to be sent by the Chelsea stage. Tile *lain. wt . , amongst other opprobrious epithets, v. hich he heaped upon the Defendant, called him C . /tri Mug. Tile Defendant, unable to restrain hire-elf, at hearing this violent expro.ainn of disgust, wioch, in his oiallion, waseso tinpertinently and injurite c:ously applied, gave his a ronger a violent blow in the eye. The Jury gave a' verdict for the Plaintiff, de. manes G.S. which obliges the Defendant to pay the .:out., ainotiating to Itilniut 60i. The Court thepgailiherned to Friday. the nth at./ ‘ December. e:dt- • : ''' . . . _ POLier:. ' e.: t• I f . aow•srarsr, wo 4/ 4!. ....- RU VTS .4 OENT-GARDEN TII EAI 4. ' •:' _.• . /ids Oftfersr, a clerk belonging to the Warraut-OiCoa r . 7 : merset-Mace, war charged w i th assaulting Mr. Cilleighltel, ' ni the pit of the theatre. Thomas Carpenter, New-street, Covent garden, deposed, that the Prisoner had, several times, during the performance. , of the Afterpiece at Covent-garden Theatre, in dipt.„,pid, pushed another person against him in a violent tainsez:1•11110, asked him what he meant ley pnnliinc another person ogliseet Lim , Ile ilmieil lie had do.ie so ; nu which the adores told in In it was a lie, for lie saw Lin in the act • , cm . iii Lick • the f`ristiner challenged him to 54111. James 0660,111 e, bothlir, Aidersgste-street, core , .snrateil the testimony of Carpenter. The Prisoner was ordered to Gad bail, which Lc iintim diately complied with, and was dnicharged. Thomas D 41,/, the watchman of it. Mary le Strand, wh, is charged with being cuucerued with another man, in wait. mg Carolina Wilcox, when suing by the Liverpool coach, t inn the Gulden Cross Inn, into St. Giles's, and rubbing Ler of a bundle, cootaining upwards of soot and her cloth es , w e n yesterday brought to this °thee, for further examinatiou. Carolina Wilcox said, she was, between give and Ma years eine., at Rosetta, in Ireland, married to her husband, John Wilcox ; tie then belonged to the Columbus ‘re.t In dianian rind was Captain's steward . he was aft erwar d ' , as she had been informed, impressed front that sh• • at Lieer pool. About two years after she was married, ;he went to her hasbatid, on board the Ulysses, at Portsmouth ; alio remained uu board that ship about 3 months, and then treat with her husband ou board the Rota, at Plymouth Dock, and Ipprate.l they were on hoard the Rota eight Sn' Mlle months, when her boatload, on commie with the Rota to Sheerness, wart sent with others on hoard the guard ship, sod was drafted from her to the Beagle eutip, at the lore, about two years since, and she had been with her husband, on hoard the liengle, from that time till last Friday ten night ; when she left that vessel in the Demi", sod the folluwiag day sensed in London. The Beagle was paid at the Note last Tuesday fortnight. Iler huattant gave her, on board the Beagle, =out. in new hank notes, except nt. is cash. Situ only changed a comes anti • one-pound note ea the road .. the renieunier 11'4n in her bundle wh e n it ~,,. steriii. %little she aas ou board the Bead", sloe tinned a ItiCe boy, who is maw about four years old, awl she under stood he was the Captain's son. She was nu boatel the Bess gle at the attack un the French diet In the Bascom 'waits, and was also ,ten board bee at the cap' ore of rush ur whoa she received SI wound in her ankle from a crape• shot Abraham Janice, the tither at the Goldeaccrm, Charing- Crony said, that be retwearbersd calling the Proserutrix, Carolina 14 deux. ou Sunday morning .eel, about six is\ lack s from the door of the Coach and Ruin-a public-house, St- Martm'i lane, tie conseqnriire of the I.:ves paid coach being nes: ly ready to start, nil knowing she was going try it ; site toti.mcd him from the Coach and Horses. and he sup. posed she was fellow mg him into the Inn-yard, bat ho mimed her, and cnuld rot find her when the couch was going oft. the conch waited about tea minutes fur her i‘lisetha, the wife of Edward Breen, . - public-buns, Di nry.laise, said, she ire, Weeder with several other watchmen, ut. Monday nits rain" week, hetmeen s., they bad thole half pints of gin, but a and left the home r.thout paying. came Intothe horse with them. The PitaPerstrix explained this, '... mot go taro the home, bat remame..! \ dour, and gut some intik ut i auntas I. the time. aglizeiv inerti a tNe servant if :littlest COURT OF COMMON PLE%4, GUILDHALL. IAA NI; A C. JACOB. This wee an action brought to recover damages for a breach of promise of marriage. It appeared that the Plaintiff and Defendant, who were of the Jewish persuasion, residing at Shadoell, had con tracted a passion for each other, which, by constant iatercourse, was heightened into such excess, shat they were unhappy in the presence of any other person, and looked upon any intrusion as a com plete beach of harnanity, as well as dei-orurn.— They had been in the constant habit of solacing each other, even in the shop of the Illeintiff's fan ther, who was to kindly indulgent to lip, sianghter: as not to iuterruit her in any little effeumstauce that might conbibute to her amirserucift The De fendant Verceiving that his advances were not of fensive to any iuiiividaal of the family (far it seems tae mother also was acquainted with the Defend alst's conduct, and gave no great oppositionto him). determined to avail himself of a certain kind of happiness, which preseuted itself to his reuses; he essayed and was successful. The lady was not in the slightest degree discomfited by his victory, as she had a full confidence in his honinir and *dic tion, not imagining that, though he might be-very profuse of the latter, lie was prevented from a strict observance of the former, by an usibicky mar riage, which had takeu place between him and a young lady, who, probably, insisted oit that old-fa shioned ceremonial, before she would submit to such freedoms as this rival of hers, in the affections of the Defendant, had allowed. A man named Solomon, stated. that the De fendant came to him, and offered him Sol. if he would marry the Plaintiff. The Defendant ap peared very anxious to restore to the Plaintiff her honesty, and told Stlornon that the father would certainly kill him (Solomon) if he knew of the in tercourse between him and his daughter ; he also said, that she was with child, and as Solomon was the father, he certainly was bound, in honour to le galise the intimacy. Solomon denied haring any such acquaiutuuce with the lady; upou which the Defendant said, that he (the Defendant) had pro mised to marry her, and she had made a vow to marry hum, and none but him ; her present family appearamse was the cunsequence of this ; it wit impossible for him to perform this contract, as lie was already married to souther person; he then re peated his offer of So:. to the witness if he would take the injured fair sue to her bosom. It eppear ed, that an action had been brought by the father of the I'laint - 4f, to recover damages from the pre sent Defendant, for the seduction of his daughter, when the pareets, and the young lady herself, ware looked upon by the jury with such cnsipassion, and the Defendant iu ao heinous a l gal, that da mage& were awarded to the Plaintiff 101. Me. Serjeant VanGeast was Counsel fur the Plaintiff, and M.. Serjeant best for the De! fondant. The lard Chief Justice Maesticho„ in sum- - -trolling the evidence, otter stet, that a inn rmr ac tion had been brayed by tese,i'llinetlrs fathei , fur the kilaction of his child; hit never witneiaeil such a phenomenon iii ally 'court of j istice, as a double aetiusi ardtr such circainstauces; he cony. dared the fatber's and daughter's as one CAM; he Ikea observed rapes it.. tipprel.abilitr of the Qt. •. a. troWw, at the ithek tee tecollectral tit Protoort Res, ruining to Art hulls. e.x a n d seweu u clw k; ut gruulti ugly pity for two, ttg She said 114 .4,M111 1 11 utknowlestriwir 4 tied on the uotttoir of the num who was p.usteas at !iithtgat Davi e, tla los& In • ■