The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1826-07-26 00:00:00

Mat there had been no evidette of a ring There was no violence used, the peaze-ellicets did rkt find it necessary to interpose, and there was nothing in the meal% treneactien to make it different lion any ordinary tejokine. The nely serious part of the ease was the evidence of Taylor, who raid that the mob came and tart atened his life. Other witnessee, however, would limiter, and explaio, if titer did not contradict, the evidence of Taylor. John Heywood was called to depose to a conversation between him and Taylor, in which the hotter said that he regretted the in tetination he cave against the prisoners, and would tell a dilletent story on the tnal, if he was not afraid. 'At tele stage of the case, it was arranged between the Coursed on both sides; that Roux, who is a young mate should be acquitted ; mid that " the other two preonera should be found guilty, and dig. Charged, spun entering into recognizance" to keep the peace. PROSECUTION UNDER VIE GAME LAW'S. Roket 41farahalt(ageti eighteen) was indicted for entering a close 4coging to ETA Motley, in the parish of Plympton St. Mary. be. (Caen foot and five o'clock in the morning, on the Uth of February lad, with intent to kill game. James Roach examine!—ls under-gamekeeper to Lord Moder. A.m.:tethers going nut on the 9th of February last, at tour o'clock in toe 'peening. to Ridge Park Copse, which belongs to lord Mor ley. Witness had not remained anger than three quarters of an hour in the copse, when he observed the prisoner enter, wish s fowl ing piece is his hand, Witness watched until he raw the.prutoner. tire at a pliciteant, which was on a tree. The bird was not shot. eVitneas thee proceeded to take the prisoner into custody, but he re mora!, and vedertly a.situlted the witness with his fowling-piece. m ' lie then ran ell; and witne permed him. 'lt mese was mopped nee; sometime by the prisoner's tether, who seized him by the col. lA% and said, s ith en oath, that he nettle cut off the witness *band it tie did not tarn back. The prmeretitin was conducted by Mr. Peeve. The prisoner. who bad no Counsel, end he would not deny that tie had been at Ridge Park Copse; but he did not leave his own House until past six o'clock. Ann elarsliall (the primaci e s mother) swore that the prisoner did nit leave home on the morning in question until after six o'clock. lo contreilict Ann Marshall's testimony, a person named lien. wood was called , who proved that he had seen the keeper (Roach) nivered with blood and dirt, two miles from Ridge Park Copse, be. ere *even o'clock. Tee prisence left the country for several months after the t.armartion. Mr. Justice GASELES told the Jury that if they believed the pri soner was found in the copse hefore flreo'clock in the maiming, they ought to find ben guilty. The Act of Parliament made it nava eery that the offence seould be committed between seven in the evening and five o'clock in the morning. The other parts of the case did not admit of any question. The Jury, after a moment's hesitation. returned the singular ver dict of "Guilty between five and six o'clock." The Learned Junoe said that verdict meant Not Guilty, and directed (hat a verdict of acquittal should be entered. The prheiner was than given in charge for an assault upon e ltivecle the gnmekceper, under the eircummances above mentioned. leper this charge he was found guilty. Anendoefosepe, a Poetuguese, of mean appearance, was put to "the bar, charged with stealing lee sheep. It appeared that the prLoner had drove the sheep from n field at Janette!, near Totnees, and offered them to the first person he met, at 2a. a head. This circumstance exciting suspicion, the prisoner was taken into custody. Refine the trial was proceeded with, Mr. Cole, the county gaoler, was sworn, and stated that from the conduct of the prisoner since its committal, he bail reason to believe that he was not of sane mind. At this moment the prisoner began kicking at those who were near him ; and, by his wild appearance and uncouth manners, obviously indicated tbat he was suffering under mental de. movement. Under the direction of the Learned JUDOr, the Jury returned a eerditt to that effect. The unfortunate maniac was remanded to prison until his Ma. :este . % pleasure shall be made known. CIVIL SIDE. ',Before Mr. Justice LITTI.EOALE.I ItEDDAWAV COIIAX, CLE ali. Mr. Sergeant WILDE, with whom were Messrs . CARTER and Wittown, stated, that this wall an action brought to recover corn pentatem in damages for false imprisonment for twelve weeks, in the county gaol of Devon. Ile was sure a complaint of this kind, if well founded, would not be slighted by any of the intel. ligent Jurymen he was addressing. lie was bound satisfactorily to prove to the Jury that the imprisonment inflicted on his client was unjustly Inflicted. and without legal or reasonable cause. If be succeeded in establishing these points, he hoped the Jury would not be demoted to undervalue the complaint of his client. The de fendant. Mr. Column was a cleigyman and a magistrate, residing at Comm House, in the pariah of Black Torrington, in this county ; and (twee of the manner in which Mr. Coham discharged his duty as a magistrate that the plaintiff complained. Until the complaint was proved: and the grounds of the complaint made apparent, it was his duty as a Camel, preferring such a charge against a inattrate. to speak of him with deference, and to treat him with for ance and respect. On establishing his case, if his Learned Friends gave him the opportunity, be would comment upon the moonstone; as they deserved. It was of essential importance in this as In entry other county, that the magisterial chat acter should tee resp!eted, and not brought into contempt ; but in proportion as it was beneficial to society, to maintain the respect due to the character of a magistrate, so also if a magistrate, wilfully, know ingly. and intentionally, was guilty of oppression, or neglected to make himself acquainted with facts winch were within Iris cog eisance, in order to prevent his actinic ignorantly and erroneously, it wee the provitseeof a Jury to punish magistrates who perverted the power with which they were entrusted for the public good, to the lettermen of Injustice. if magistrates were allowed to commit injustice with impunity, there was an end to all respect for them and for the laws. The charge against the defendant was, that he committed the pleintlifte prison. either without a shadow of cause or in igneranre of fact, which it was his duty and his power to secermin. The plaintiff ors a farmer, living near Mr. Coham. !laving some agreement with his landlord respecting some ground which he held from him, in a peace called the Chilly Estate, he un dertook to deliver it up if the under-tenants to whom he had iet snrrendered it to him. Amongst the under.tenants was one named Strung, who, after some hesitation, consented to surrender hie part of the land, if senr.e dues were paid for him. Subsequently all the other tenants consented to deliver up their tenements, in or der thee the plaintiff might be enabled to surrender it to his land lord. A meeting of . all the tenants took place. and it would be proved that the defendant was made acquainted with all the cir euntstar.ces of the rettlement, by which the under-tenants agreed to deliver up the lands to Retitle% ay. Strong ;afterwards objected to this 'mermen', and the cue was 4 s econd time brought before Mr. Ciliate, on a claim for poor tetra, and a balance of rent due to the heed landlord. Strong again agreed, and Reddaway paid the raves. On Sercing's going hack the second time, Reddaway consi dering him bound by his egteement, went to tnke possession of the land, and tercatened to seize and impound Strong's cow, as damage Peasant on the land. el'hether he ens right or wrong in this con duct was immaterial to the present question. Strong told Reddaway that if he seized his cow he would run him through with a pitch firk. Re :dewily having pad his money according to agreement, thoeght la had a right to the land. He therefore proceeded early on the manning .of the 4th May, le2S, to the lands, and 'indica the cow of Strong, drove her to pound, of which a man.named Dennis, was the keeper. This man Dennis observed that the gate of the pound was broken, and offered to put the cow into his amble. Readily/4y told hint the amount of the damage, on payment cif which be might properly release the co*. Strong's wife, with a constable, armed with a warrant, came soon after to apprehend Reddaway, as if he had Peden the cow. Reddaway, Strong, hit wife, and others, went before Ale. Coham on this charge. el.reCoham refused on that occasion to hear Reedaway's defence, end ordered him to be confined that night, and that the parties shculd come eiraip next manning, lie (Mr. Sergeant eVilde) was bound to pre. some that the elagistiate's business was of so pressing a nature that he was justified in holding the charge over until the morning, and keeping pima' in confinement in the mean time. When the charge wait made. all the circumstances were known to Mr. Cohan). Under these circumstances, he put it to the Jury, c: whom some were Magistrates, what they would do? No ',sooner d id Mr. Cohain see Reddaway, than he ennounced to him the intention which he afterwards carried into effect. " Rechlawat," raid M, " !AO mend you to gaol." A declared intentionofsending the plaintiff to gaol, without hearing complaint or defence, showed on unmet disposition of mind. The evidence would show whether this was a Nutty declaration only, or the effect of on unkind feeling to wards Redditway. It was for the Jury,land not for him to determine Aso. However, the leaning was so decided, that on the defendant's asking se me Illation of Strong, the plaintiff, addressing Mr. Coham, said, n Sir, you seem to know all the clreumsettlees already. I 0411 tell you my ease, and have witnesses here to support what I say ; me landlord is present as one of my *linemen" Mr. edited, however, to hear the evidence, and upon an ex parte etieteretnt rent this man to gaol on a charge of felony. If this was ea trim of judgment, it ought to be treated as such but no man who undertook the duties of a Magistrate. should so end tify himself, and set in a manner calculated to bring disgrace on those who appointed him. Could any one believe this man stole the row, when he had witnesses present to prove that he im plunded it for a distress. But it wee not enough to send the man to the Cranny gaol ; Mr. Cohan) sent a letter with him to the Gaoler, intimating that he was " a bail man." Was this usual for Magistrates? and did it not prove Mr. Collate's feel item 2 After the man was committed. Mr. Cohan get abort get. ting tasidence against him. He took the deposition of one witness, but never sent it to the sessions, es a Magistrate was bound to do. This was a most unjustifiable course. magistrates were bound to se m' ell examinations to the Assizes and Sessions, that the Judges and Chairman might peruse them. This was neglected, however, in the present case ; but a bill was tent before the Greed Jury, which they very properly ignored. Mr. Coham setrwardi met one of the witnesses in Exeter. He asked lent what brought him to Exeter, as he had withdrawn his recognizance ? The witness raid he came up to give evidence , , and did net know that his recognirances were discharged. Mr. t'nham afterwards said he mistook, when he said the man's recognetances were discharged. and advised him to go again to Exeter. and gave Lira a pound nuts to carry him there. Reddaway wie, discharged. Mr. Cohain knew well he was not guilty of felony. If he was able tv prove. them Each, and that there was no reasonable ground for the eetentiffei vnntitinent, the Jury could not refuse him a verdict. Rut if el r. Cohem shrived that his conduct, though erronersit, was feassepe. and to the beet of his eiriginent, in the honest though is,;rlOten discharge of his date, he would tell his client, " Yes, you hare suffered ; but it ja mote IMICIICIaI to society that you should suffer. than that a Magistrate should be condemned for an error of judgment ;" for to en was a misfortune ißcidental to hurnan naturr. _ _ _ . —•-• .• John Leaman, sworn—l am clerk to Mr. Furlong, attorney I for the plaintiff. I have a copy of the notice which I served on Mr. Coham, for this action. He said when I saved him, it is nothing more than I expected. Da aulant'a Counsel here offered to admit the formal proofs. James Bowls sworn—ls an auctioneer , living in the •h of Highampton. Knows plaintiff; who is a tanner, residing aver ley. He is sixty years of age. Knew Strong and D who Is keeps the Unities Inn. Strong. Redd:may, and a man DIM Sae% were at the (*olden Inn on the 21Ith March, 1823. 'Mr. Coham lives rear Hoverter, and is a illagistrate. Witness went With plain tiff before him. Haider/ay said he had no objection to pay the ' poor rates of the Chilley estate if the tenants gave him up possession before the 26th of March, which was the agreement they made with him. Mr. Coham said that that was just, and one of the tcrotriti said he had already given up the possession. Coham then spoke to Strong, who said he psid Os. fol., which he wanted back. Rattles:ay said " you agreed to give me possession," and Strong replied." Yes, but I must have my money." Afterwards Reddaway paid the rates and the panics separated. This was in March. In May witnesswent with Itattlaway to Chilly, and saw a cow there. Reddaway after wards took the cow, ant drove her to the °Wen Inn, the Landlord of which is pound-keeper of Ilighammon. Next morning a war rant was issued, and all the partial went before Mr. Odom, who told steins that:he subpernaed him for the rest morning, to give information against Reddaway. Reddaway and witness thin walked to the Holden Inn with the cow. Soon after a constable named Parkwell came to the Holden Inn, and said ha should take Retidaway. IVltneas, Reddaway, and many others, appeared nest morning before Mr. Coham, who mid. " Reddaway, I'll immediately send you to gaol ; and you likewise," meaning witneas• llama, a respectable forma i - the brother-in.law of Reddaway, was present. and Mr. Coham said to him, " Har ris, you anne to give hail; hut I'll take none." He then read an del of Parliament, and said to witness, " Bowls, I have you : any one aiding or assisting is us bad as the thief." After some conversation, defendant swore witness, and witness told all that passed between him and Reddaway, shout impounding the cow. Defendant said afterwards that witness should he examined in Exeter, and should he bound in 40/. to appear. Reddaway said, " I' did not mean to snarl the cow. but to put her in pound and Mr. Cohain answered, " that is no matter ; you know what you pro. raised when I was down about the poor rates, so 1 shall send )0..a to gaeL" Iteddaway said, "Bowls and Davis you've only put the col in pound." Reddaway was then committed to prison. About a month after, Mr. Coiiam took whiten's deposition, and said, " I hear peop le say, you are going up with evidence in Reddaway'S favour. He then took down witn, ass deposition, observing that Itaidaway ought not to have put the cow in the stable of the Gol den Inn, but have taken it back to Black Torrington pound. dlr. Coham then took witness's vengnizance to appear m Exeter against Hcddaway, and in obedience to this recognizance witness came. H e there nict MT. Coham in the Iligh.s:reet, who said, " Bowls, you have no loisinem here, I let you off your recognizance .' Witness said, " Sir, you did n o t ." Ile said, " I did, on my honour." Wit. new saw Cohan) again after the assizes. Ile called at his house and said, " there is a mistake between you rind me respecting your re. cognizances." Witness said, "itis on your side. Sir." He said, " I will give you a one pound note out of my pocket, aod •then you will not be worse off than the rest." They then parted, after he gave witness the one pound note. Cross.examined.-1 attended at Mr. Coham's between seven and eight o'clock, with the plaintiff and the others. Mr. Cohath then said to me, " I'll send you to gaol also." Ile gave me no reason for adjourning the meeting of hearing to the following mtining. The plaintiff appeared to be in liquor. I did not, upon my oath, hear the defendant my that he adjourned the meeting because the plaintiff was in liquor. The plaintiff was in liquor, but he was ab e to walk. It was to give evidence against the plaintiff that I was bound over in 401., yet, when I met the defendant in Exeter, he told me I was not to come there. I paid the expenses out of my own pocket. I got nothing from the county. The defendant gave me a one pound note 1 have known him ten years. He is a cler. gyman. I can't say how long he has been a magistrate. I believe he transacts a good deal of bosiness as a magistrate. I did not say before the defendant that I did not know any thing about the tak ing of the tow, nor whose cow it was. I had some conversatiou on my way to Exeter with Mrs. Strong. I did not tell her I would procure some Money for her to hold her tongue. I told some jury men I met to go down to see the pound and the gate. Sttong end his wife said they did not care a d—n, they would swear plaintiff stole the cow If they should not get 101. I then said, what would you thinkof &I.? i don't recollect ever afterhaviog any conversation fibrotic money. I did not tell Parkwell that nothing was said be fore defendant of impounding the cow. Whet plaintiff said " I did not steal the cow, but I took her to place her in the pound," Co lson then said, " that Is nothing, I'll send you to gaol." Leonard Dennis sworn—Said, I am pound-keeper at the Golden Inn. I remember Reddaway, the plaintiff; bringing a cow with him on the 4th of May, 1823, The pound was out of repair, and I put the cow in the stable, as I put other cattle there before. He told me she was B:Tong's cow. Several persons came to my house after—Mrs. Strong, Bowls, Martin, Parkwell, &c. They staid at my house till four o'clock. Then we all went with Parkwell, the constable, to Mr. Cohaut's. This was between five and six in the evening. Mr. Cohan; said the man was in liquor, and he would rather have him in the morning. We did not enter into the business then. We came next morning. The defendant was in the hall, and said, " Iteddaway, I shall send thee to gaol, and Bowls like. , wise," or some such words. Plaintiff said he had brought the cow to pound. Myselfand Bowls,and Bet Strong and lice husband, were examined. I told him the cow was brought to me about five in the morning, or a little before that hoar. I said he had known all the rest from Reddaway. Plaintiff said he had brought the cow to pound, and it would be eery hard if' he should be sent to gad for that. The defendant said he should put him to gaol, for he stole the cow. I was in the room during DOWWS eAllnlieitiODe I do not recollect all that passed. Mr. Justice LITT LEDALE here invited Mr. Sergeant Wilde and Mr. Williams to confer with him. The Learned Counsel, after sonic private conversation with his Lordship, conferred fur some time with their respective clients. After which Mr. Sergeant 'WILDE said, that his Lordship had suggested to him, that though the facts might be established, yet the point of law was against his client. The defendant, also, with that knew. ledge of his Lordship's opinion on the law in his favour, was willing to leave the whole facts to be investigated by some gentle , man. The defendant was aiso willing, notstithstataling this know , ledge of the point of law to submit to nhatcver decision a gentle ; man to be named shoulit make, and to pay to the plaintiff what , ever should be awarded as due to his sufferings, although he was I aware that he had acted in this matter to the best of his dil -1 i cretion. A Juror was then ivitinlraem, sod the whole of the case was re ferred to arbrration. LIVERPOOL MADSLWJIER SESSI(JA'S. EIIIGIRATION. On Saturday Messrs. Oliver and James Bedtett were arraigneAl on an ineictment, charging them wtth' conspiring to defraud tao persons, !Arnett Michael and Eleanor Kennedy, of the sums of 51. Ili. and IL Ili., under the false colour of procuring them a pas sage to America. Illessrs. Jost and Ca o MPTON conducted the prosecution, and Blessrs. ll atxcoca, HALL and Verrant.E3, the defence. The evidence was very voluminous on both sides, and the trial 'gated about nine hours; we arc therefore enabled only to give a brief outline of the case. On the part of the prosecution it was proved that a poor Irish woman, named Eleanor Kennedy, came to Liverpool, in the early part of May last, to get a passage to America. For this purpose she went to the office of afessrs, O. Beckett and Co. of . Strand street, who are passenger brokers, and there' paid a deposit of 3/. towards her passage money. Not being, however, able• to raise the rem4inder of the money, the 3/. were returned to her again. and she went back to Ireland. She then scraped to.tether all she could, in order to send her son and daughter to America, as they were unable, from the distress in their own =lntel!, to obtain a livelihood, and they all came' to Liverpool on the 24th of May. Mn Kennedy went to Beckett's office, and bargained for the nsssige of her son and daughter In the ship Plutarch, for New York. She agreed to give U. 10s., being all, lite possessed ; and on paying that sum she received a receipt, in acknowledg ment that they were entitled toe passage in that ship. Iler sou, Michael, a few days before the vessel sailed, went with the other passengers to the Cliftolo4tOtne, where he paid Is. Gd. to Beckett, to have his name entered on the muster-roll. The son and daughter then went on board with their stork of provisions, &c., and re mained there. On the morning of the 30th May, the Plutarch sailed, and when she, got round the Rock the names of the passen gers were called ore? from the muster-roll, where it was found that the names of the two Keonedyn, and some others, were not entered. Kennedy showed the Captain the document he had {,•3t from Bec kett, but the Captain said he could not take him, ts his name was not on the niuster;roll. Some of them remonstrated, but the re sult was that seventeen of therp were ordered into boats, with their luggage, &c. and Sent back to Liveipool. 'rite muster,roll was roodueed, when it appeared that the name! of Michael and Eleanor Kennedy were not e nt e r e d. - Witnesses were called on the part of the defendants, one cf whom, named Ilanway, proved that the money paid by 3lrs. lien. nedy was only as a deposit in part of a SUM ore/. ,154., which was.' the price of the passage of two persons ; that 31m. Kennedy was told, that unless the paid therentaintler before the muster-roll was cleared, her ton and daughter could not be entitled to their passage; that, upon asking her for the balance, she said phe could not pay it. It was also sworn that she had offered a bribe to a person to secrete her son and daughter oil board the ship ; and one person, named Evans, who had secreted ;tin:self so as .to .get a passage gratis, swore that Michael Kennedy Was found Secreted under some bed clothes at the same time titat he was stoweti,away among the cargo. Mr. Petrie gate the Betketis n very good character. Fie had fie. quently employed them to get passe tigers for his ships, and always retold them honest and industrious. Captain Petrie, shipowner, gave the Recketta a similar character. The latter gentleman said that the Plutarch was an American ship, and, according to the British Act of Parliament. the number that the Plutarch was en ticed to carry was 1411, reckoning two children between amen and fourteen years of age' as one adult, or three under seven years. There is, however, a new American law which wakes no allowance for age, accounting every individnal, infant or adult, as one person. The inspector of the port reports to the Board of ettetonts at Lon don, what number of passengers such a vessel can cotiver.ien;ly cary, and upon his report the licence is made out, so that there is no triode of icnowlng the correct nitualicr of passengera mail the, TUE BRITISH PRESS. license arrives. It not itnerequently happens, that, upon the ar rival of the licence it is found that there are too many passengers engaged by one vessel, in consequence of which, :he surd !us num ber is put on shore :ond seta by another vessel. Mr. Jos' called k the witnes.ses on the part of the prosecution. who, upon being again questioned, swore that what they had for. merly rated was correct, and that no such circumstances as those detailed by flatways and Evans ever took place. lianway, on his cocas-examinbien, raid that the unlearnt practice, when his em ployers received money in part payment for the passage, was, to give such & document as was produced to Mrs. Kennedy, specifying the reeelpt of a certain sum, but not stating whether it was a depo sit, and what balance rem ained. Two papers however were pro duced, which be after some time admitted to be in Messrs. ekett's handwriting, and which specified the amount of the etsposit and the balance remaining due. Considerable discussion took place during toe trial. which pro. longed it to an unusual length. The defendants' Counsel con. tended that the transaction was a fair one, and at most it was but a mistake of the defendants, who had offered the money hack, or to provide a passage fn another ship. Mr. Joy contended that Evans and tianwey had given such testimony as it was impossible fur the Jury to believe. Several times during the trial the Recorder wished the ease to rop, and after the prosecutor ' s case had been gone through, be put it to the Jury whether they could say there was any proof of a eon. 'piracy. The Jury, however, wished the case to proceed to the end. At the conclusion, The REcounfn addressed the Jury, and said, that before they could find a verdict of guilty, they must be satisfied that the de. Pendants, at the time they received the money, with loose and eon , rapt minds conspired together to defraud these poor persons, under the colour of minting a passage to America, when in fact they did not contemplate procuring that passage. If the case was merely for a.bredeh of contract, there would be sufficient evidence to sup. port it 4 but he certainly, thought that the-charge of conspiracy was not made out. The Jury consulted for a considerable time in Court, and Men they were conducted Seto a private room, where they remained un til about half-past nine o'clock. During the t r Lbsence, Mr. Joy said. that the ends of public jut lice woa di t be sufficiently answered by this indictmentoend as thore was an ope:egefator the same defendants, in which Hallway, Davis, act-1 erste fneladed, he would not offer any evidence to the'Jury. s Whtu the Jnry retthrnat they frond the defendants ;nifty. The Recorder sentenced them to pay a live of (4. each to the King. The Jury were then sworn on the other indictment, charging the Beckets with a shads:offence ; Nano evidence being offered, they were ere-patted. The case seemed to excite coniiderable interest, and the-Court was crowded until the verdict was returned. 1.4 W NOTICES. COURT ON CHANCERY. .perons TOR LORD CMANCIILLOA, IN LINCOLN'S INN IIA&L. Tan DAT. ♦T TRH. Remaining Motions. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT. WORN TIN WICS,GRANCILLOR, IV LINCOLN'S INN, Till OAT, AT PAL/•PAST TEN. RCl3llllllllff ilodians. COURT OP PREROGATIVE. Caveat Dam VICTORS CIA 3011 R NICOOL. Wednesday, Angnst . Wednesday, Sopteetbes 64 Wednesday, Oc tober 4.—To sit at 'fen o'clock, rich day. COURT OF ADMIRALTY. Defltuft Mtg. BLIORS LORD lITOIrit.L. ThUnday, August 3l Thursday, September 7 ; Thursday, October .5. To sit at Kieran o'clock, each day. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, TI nsttax," Jimw 25. WELHAW r. ROWRING. On the LORD CHANCELLOR entering Court this morning. an elderly Gentleman of the rame of Bowing presented himself to the notice of his Lordship, and addressed him as follows :—N 1 beg to remind your Lordship of the appeal case of Welman against Bow. r'ng, which lies been standing in the paper a long time. lam one of the parties in that ease, and as I have been detained in London at great inconvenience to myself end family, I would wish to know, my Lord, ween it is I may expect the judgment of the Court ?" The LORD enaweEttou—Sir, I have not forgotten your case but the more you sat fot judgment, the less you arc likely to get it. hlr. llowring then expressed a hope that his Lordship would dis pose of it on an early day. The LORD CHANCELLOR-If you think, Sir, that these things are to be as easily settled as you wish, you will find yourself mis taken. . . M i XAT n. 11071ERTSON. Immediately before the rising of the Court, Mr. lticxErtaTETH, addressing the Vice-Chancellor, begged leave to remind his Honour, that in this cue (which was a question of copyright) the defendant had undertaken not to publish the work, which was the subject of the suit, until the plaintiff should have brought the matter before the Court, at the then next ensuing seal. Now, as two days of that (the present seal) had passed over, with out any motion on the part of the plaintiff, he (Mr. nickerstetb) begged leave to state, that his client (the defendant) held himself no longer bound by his undertaking. ' It wee here, intimated to the Court thit Mr. Heald (who was Counsel foe the plaintiff) was ready to proceed, but that he was engaged in the Court of Chancery. The VICE•CHANCELLOIL said, that at that hour of the day (three o'clock) he could not enter upon the case, and here the sub ject dropped. _ INSOLVENT DEBTOR'S COURT, TUESDAY. JULY 23. Henry Butler, steward to a ship, applied to be discharged from a debt of M. Ile stated that he had been afflicted with a fever and ague for several months past, and had no other means of sup port during that time but the produce of his wife's industry; that he had offered a hill fur the payment of the present debt, after his return from the next voyage, but it was refused. The Cm tEI ComsttsstowEn asked him what means he had to defray the expenses of the present petition. The insolvent said that the attorney paid the expense out of his own pocket.—lle was discharged. John Kyan, a wine-merchant from Cheltenham, was brought up. The titter CommisstowEn having examined his schedule, read from it the following remark, made by the insolvent, viz.:— '• I attribute my inaolvenry to the feet of having been supplied with inferior wines by my creditor, No. 2." Mr. Coox said that the cause of the insolvency ought to be erased from the schedule. After some observations from the Chief Commissioner, the in solvent was remanded until the 4th of August. Charles biliott being brought up, W. Spenser, the Keeper of the new Debtors' Prison stated, that he had received an order in the afternoon of yesterday to bring up the insolvent to-day : subsequent to which he received his discharge from the detaining creditor; and as he thought it was irregular, he brought the pi loner up. The CHIEF COMMISSIONEE censured the spiteful conduct or some yindictive creditors, who in several instances, for a debt of a few shillings, keep a debtor for seven or eight weeks in pris m, until the fees amount to a c .nsiderable sum ; they then send the discharge of the debtor, having gratified their spleen by puttirg him to expense which, in many cues, he is unable to pay. Alter a few imitable observations, the insolvent was discharged. Mack Marks, a slopseller of Romford, was opposed by Mr. Richardson, an attorney. Being examined by Mr. COOKE, on behalf of the opponent, he said that he had been in the King's Bench rrison since Novena. bar lnst ; bad been part of the time unwell ; had m •de some money in prison by selling milk, and letting out his roam, which enabled him to support his wife and seven children. Samuel Levi also appeared to oppose him for a ee'at of 2al/. The insolvent, he said, had induced him to buy some slops for him, and accept bills to the amount of the debt. Ater he had l eel attested for one of the bilW, the prisoner sold all the property the! was in his shop, came to London, and rendered to a a art no, in which witness was his bail. Under these circumstances be h sped the Court would not discharge him. The Cuter COMMISSIONER, however, was of a diffe - ent opinion, end said he did not see sufficient grounds for detain ing him. The indictment was disehargal. lllr. Bowring bowed to his Lordship and withdrew. WYNNE t. JACKSON. Mr. Sucinnx applied to the Court, for an order directing that the money which had been paid into Court by the plaintiff in this case should not be taken ont by the defendant, until the appeal which bad been lodged against a dccisiou of the Vice-Chancellor in the cause had been heard. It appeared that the order for paying the money into Court had been obtained upon the representation that Mr. Wynne had be. come the loser of a considerable sum of money to certain parties whom he met at the house of a Mr. Callender. After dinner cards were introduced, arid the game of whist was the order of the night ; in the course of the play Mr. Wynne, somewhat in contradiction to his name, bat 6808/. to Colonel Charity of the Life Guards, a Mr. Fleming, and (as we understood) Mr. Callender. A bill of ex change for 2flOof. was immediately given by Mr. Wynne to Col. Charity, as his share of the stakes, which was atterwarde paid by the Colonel to the defendant Jackson. This bill of honour was on us arriving at maturity dishonoured, and two other bills were given to supply its place, which ultimately shared a similar fate with that of their predecessor. The latter bills being held by Jackson at the tirne they became due, he applied to Colonel Charity, who said that he was going to France, whither Mr Wynne had gone before hint, antlPie would procure from that gentleman other bills in lieu of those which had become due. 'the Colonel, on his arrival, obtained bilis from Mr. Wynne, which were drawn on French stamps, arid, being in his own name, he on his return to England indorsed them over to the defendant Jackson. These bills not being paid, Jack son authorized a Mr. Mansell to commence an action against the parties in the French Court t hut the defendant did not succeed in recovering the amount, on the ground that the bills did not express fur what consideration they had been given. An action was then commented in this country, upon which Mr. NVynne filed his bill in Chancery for the purpose of haring the bills cancelled, and he also applied for and obtained an injunction in the Vice-Chancellor's Coutt, to retrain the defendant Jackson from proceeding at law, which was granted upon condition of Mr. Wynne'a bringing the money into Court. Against this injunction the defendant had en. teted an appeal. and the application which Mr. Sugden now made was, that his Lordship would not let the money be taken out of Coort by the defendant till the appeal had been heard. Mr. BORNE and Mr. ais.NCE were in opposition to the motion. Mr. StortEN replied. Ile thought it was very improbable that a person of the high rank which Colonel Charity sustaiucel would become the agent of Mr. Jackson, the stock-broker, in procuring a renewal of title originating in a gambling transaction. The sup position was absurd. Why did nut Mr. Jackson, if lie was con scious that the hilts were given fee a valuable consideration, go to the Tribunal de Commerce, which everybody knew was the proper place for trying actions on bills of exchange. The Loan Cttarecer.LOK thought that no case had been made out which would anthorizehim to keep the money out of the pocket of a gentleman who was 71OL reresented to be insolvent. If the minim succeeded on the appe a l, they might bring it in agein. Motion refused. ROTHSCHTLT) sottave. The SOLICITOR.GENERAL moved for an order to dissolve an injunction which had been obtained by Mr. Rothschild under the following circumstances:—ln the latter part of the year 1823. Mr. Rothschild entered into an agreement with a Spanish Ame rican merchant of the name of Alcedo, for the purchase of a quan tity of silver, to the value of nearly 200,0001. The silver was de. Reeved, partly in Spanish dollars, and partly in bars ; for whicb Mr. Rothschild paid Mr. Alcedo in cash and French Rearm. Soon after this transaction'. Mr. Alcedo became a bankrupt, and Mr. Solarte was appointed assignee of his estate. On applying to the Rank of France for the dividends on the lisides, which had formed part of the purchase-money for the silver bullion, it was discovered that no milliliter had been made of dean from Mr. l'othschld to Mr. Alcedo. Mr. Solarte, as assignee of the bank rupt, accordingly applied to Mr. Rothschild for payment of the amount thus inadvertently suffered to remain due to the bankrupt's estate. Mr. Rothsclifel being cpprehensive that if lie should pay the money to the assignee without the sanction of this Court, end the effects should be misapplied by such assignee, it would not exonerate him from a lqal liability to the casalitors of the bank rupt, he therefore resisted the payment, and applied to this Court for an Injunction to restrain the assignee from proceeding at law for its recovery, which was accordingly granted. The Solicitor-Gene ral argued on behalf of the assignee, that the injunction ought to be dissolved, and thist Mr. Rothschild should be. ordered to pry to him the money remaining due for the benefit of the bankrupt's estate. • The LOUD CHANCELLon asked wilether the bankrupt had been examined ? • The SOLICITOnaGENERAL replied that he was not aware of that fact. Mr. Haat' (who was Counsel for Mr. Rothschild), said it was not foe his client to examine the bankrupt. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought that the bankrupt ought to hate been examined. it thousand circumstances might transpire from hie examination, which were at present wholly unknown to the Court. Ile did not see at present that there was any thine to justify him in sustaining the injunction. Let it therefore be this. solved. Mr. Rana. perfectly acquiesced in his Lordship's decision, and he had no doubt Maßothschild would be quite satisfied to pay over tie money to the assignee, that gentleman being required to hold it subject to the usual trusts. Till LORD CHANCELLOR said, that he had nothing whatever to do with the assignee. Whenever the money should be paid to That gentleman, no doubt he would discharge his duty by a proper application to the bankrupt's property. The injection was accordingly dissolved. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, TUESDAY, JULY 2t. her application, as she had ro mon y. He •nr: . CITY TITHES. neighbourhood, she was directed to a countryn m.'.. m'nouciat v. 'WARIER. • Carrier -street, who told her to come to the office anti ,:. • In this rate, a bill had been filed by the plaintiff, to compel pay. Magietiatem the following case : meet of a tithe of la. 9d. in the pound, for premises situate in " Ann Hogan, 22, Church-lane, Ructeridge-strer, the Rectory of St. Helen's; to which the defendant had answered, baring been abutted, insulted, and assaubcd so re , r and . . Daniel Buckley, labourer, residing in the same house':: l ‘i Mr. Coe. now appeared for the defendant, to apply for leave to timed I that haviag been beaten by hint so often n: d u file a supplemental answer. In his original answer, the defendant fully, and that he has threatened to take lor it.,. ~...' had rested his defence on the non.emolment of the Act of Henry times , whic h has p ut th e safes A n n Hoga r rin path to ,:,!.; ,' ar VIII.; hut since it had been placetton the file, the di fendant had she conceives her life to be in danger; and therefo re I r - discovered (by an answer filed by the Company of heathersefiers to 1 the aid and protection of the It Magistrates nt ii.;,., n a similar bill tiled by the same plaintiff ), that there was evidence rough - street ; and she now attends in parson to take th e n ; ,, ' to prove a money payment, Previotts to the Act of Henry VIII., in ' bind.the said Daniel Buckky to keep the peace, h er I sts heir' lieu of tithes for the premises in question which formed aart of a In danger. As she h a s no m ea n s o f etto p ort i g he;F•l t 2 - property held by the Lestherselfets' C ompany. The affid p avit on Den years old) but from hard work, she humbly pray. ~, which the motion rested, stated the discovery of this new evidence the Court to grant her a poor warrant, fur which sit , wait, in the manner above.mentloned, and that it appeared (from the the answer of the Leathersellers' Company referred to), that before the 1 " sincerest watitude, and as in duty bound, nits (Ter prat , To eg..‘Vorshipful Magistrates of illulbcrough-str eet dissolution of the monasteries, in the reign of Henry VIII., and Police Of previous to the passing of the Tithe Act, there had been a money This petition was evidently the production of one of dies.. payment of Bs. 3d. per annum,matie to the Prioress of St. Helen's who pick up a living in and about the gaols by writirc (at the rate of two shilling* andthree farthings per quarter), in lieu and defences for Prisoners about to he tried, whom n ,....,, of the tithe of these particular premises. The affidavit further , thrm'elrcat nor pig a councillor. IlLif.a.erowa i s ~., . stated, that the defendant had reason to believe, that if allowed he 1 , but Hogan told Sir George Tarrant the man ,t;,l should be able to maintain this as a good sod sufficient ground in I She was into to go into the cl e rk' s offi ce , and six resistance of the plaintiff's claim. The beamed Counsel therefore warrant without pay. expressed his hope that the Court would grant his application, as, so far as the justice of the case was concerned, it would not put the .plaintiff in a worse situation than he was at present. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said, the difficulty in this ease was that the application was a seeking to commence the suit de wore but that lie feared it came too late fur such a purpose. Mr. Cog aiihnii!ted that as this was the case of a Solicitor of that Court, who having become the madmen of the impropriate tithes of St. Helen's. was now suing the inhabitants of that rectory for the full tithe of 2s. 9tl. in the pound, he trusted his Honour would accede to his motion, and so enable the defendants to meet the justice of the case. • The VICE•CUANCELLOR !aid that the quality of the plaintiff made no alteration in the cue, nor in the nature of the application In that Court: for if the plaintiff had a right to the tithes in questions, his claim must, in that Court, be treated like that of any other person wbo might put forward a similar claim. " I will not say (continued hie Honour) that 1 ant not well-inclined to grant this motion, but I cannot do that which would prejudice the plaintiff's case. I must therefore refuse this application, with , costs." S.. *AI etc ROlintßY. Eliot Donovan. an Irish girl about seventeen yerr i < brought up 'root St. James's watch-house, for roblAP:4 Belle Goy 4e of two pairs of silk stockings, twit pairs of s•c:::- logs, a pair of net sleeves, some gloves, and olier !h:n w . i n her box. There were other things missing, but as they ef WA not be found, *ere not taitun . into the account. Dlademttixelle Loyie stated thstsfthe bad lodgings at N. 14, i n the Quadrant, Regent -street ; that die prisoner s the serva l * of the igodhidy, but hal td look after th e apartments wa of the Inio n Oust a short tithe before the prisoner was discharged she missel a till. net, and a sovereign from her tollette ; she *ceased the girl c° • taking the money, when she return , d the 201. note, but denied ate knowledge oldie sovereig n . O n S aturday last she was dismissed, and en witne-s desiring_ to see the contents of her box. the prlstrer gave up various articles belonging to the 'fitness, but refused to bare her box examined. Not ante, fied that the prisoner hal returned the whole of her things, whness hal the grl f !towed to her lodg ing, where the articles produced were found. iloothma-•, watch-hou , e.keeper of St. James's said le :pyre hended thi pisoner at her lodgings in a'street in Holborn. lie searched her I ox, and in it found the article" owned by the lady, and 'four pairs of stockings belonging to a gentlemen resiling t o the some in use as Ma temei‘ell. Tie gentlem in ieentitit d the stockings u his propetty, and ir. qtaired of the prisoner fora black ai,:k handkerchief taker out of his i room. The primmer cried, aid Pad ale had nothing to say as to the things four d in her be*, and knew nothing of the hanekachief. Sir 0 FAQRANT said the gentleman's chine need to. be taken, as the n se of ,11a•W Ilf is He sral complete of heti,. The paq es se:e tound ot er to prosecute, and the girl fully committed. CROSS CHARGES. Two women were brought up on croae.warrants ; that is, eath obtained a warrant against the other, for an assault. Teey were both ordered to be loc ked up to End tail, which had the effict of restoring bath to good lnimour in a eh et time i for they mutually forgave one another, am! wittilrew the chalets. 'two girls driven out of the City for ismer-yea king, we% yester. day ordered to find bail for the same thing in St. James's. Sir G. Emmaus. remarked, " I suppose the Lord Mayor sent them here for the benefit of the west.end gentlemen. I% e roust drive them all hack again." EXTRAORDINARY INVESTIGATION. LAMBETH-STILLS:T.—Name days since, Capt. Monroe, a gen tleman of fortune, applied to the Slagistrates for tbeir asitbmert in the recov.ry of his son, a young man 23 years of. age, who had been far some time missing. Mr. Monroe rated that be had placed his son, who was insane, with a person canted Bell, in Mile -end. road, but he had lately received Information ' without being apprised of the circumstance by Bell, t h at h e had been missing. lie had made every inquiry in his power fur hi st , b ut st ill no truce ceilidhs found. The Magistrates gave directions to the Alerts to lead every assistance in their power. All efforts, however, proved fruit. leas, and on Monday Mr. Monroe agi In applied, sta ing that, hem what information he was able t n collect, he had et ery reason ta think that, from the sera ;e manner in eh oh Mr. lel h d tetanal his son, there was but too much reason to suppote that he bad de stroyed himself. Ile hoped, therefore, tssat a 'anent wou!d be granted for his apprehension. The Alagistrate declined issuing the warra-t, but at the saute time granted a summons for Mr. Pelt, and thort persons whom Mr. Monroe avid could sugastantiate It:. el az.% Yesterday, in consequence, all the pi r.es were in sttendance, and Mr. Monroe recapitul ded his cl a g., ad i g, that his stnr picions were strengthened by the c rzt t :nee of R. ststin4 that on the day on which his son was ms• d he k him out to walk tcw :rds Batters's, while, in poi, t off at be w a a:en en the evening of tha , day c string Into town tr on Co 1. Mr. MARDWICK—What interest too d las hare in destroying your son ? Mr. hlomo—As to interest, I d k ow, but it way hare happere It at whila they were out, •,1. who as. in the habit of treating him milt cruel y, might, ins qaarri, h ye given him a blow which Wiled him. Me. H AI , writ a—Real y this is a most eat's° ins y vharge ;it is pet f .ctly g:oundle•s and u supported. ire is n/ evidence for me to act upon. I niu,t, therefore, dismiss the cow. Mr. Dell, before lcav'nl the office, denied tl e cht rze of art.•lty altogether, and said tl a- he never made use of greater coerdcn than was abmlutely never. sr to nst•ain they u g Man from acs of violence; he al. o Meted that Mr. 141..ar0e himself was tabjected to the ume malaey with shl:h his eon wee afflicted. No a cou t has as ye- keen received of t:e young man. - - ROBBERY BY A SERVANT. Lirretoar HALL.—Yestoiday a young woman, recently in the ser vice of a genee nen named Simeon, residing in Pjckham, ors bronght up to this office in custody, before the sitting Magistrate, R: J. CHAMBERS, E.q. eharged with stcalin4 a silk ace. a silver llC6l{t-box, and some cambric pozket hendkerc:iiels, the property of I:er master. Front the evidence it appeared that, about three we k ago, Mr. Simson's house was broken into, aud re bbed of a to is:y of pro party. The thieves were apprehended in a few lieurs :taboo:rent to the burglary, on the road leading from Peckham, and the greater portion of the stolen articles found in their t o,ses,ion. The girl at the bar was the chief evidence against them, she havirg xc g nised the two men on whom the property wa4 discotere.l, toitering about her master's hnusc previous to its having been broken is o and robbed. She was accordingly bound over as one of the wit nesses to prosecute; but previously a silk scarf belonging to Mrs. Simson, which that lady had taken off htr shoulders and placed on the drawing-room table, was missed from that . situation. The pri soner was the parson on whom suspicion rested, bur she solemnly denied the accusation. However, on the trial of the men for the burglary, it was discovered that one of them was so well kaolin to the prisoner that he had been paying his athlreases'to her. This circumstance strengthened the suspicion already formed, and en examining her boxes, the scarf, silver sc.mt-box, and cambric pocket handkerchiefs, were discovered therein; Mr. Simson attended, and identified the above articles, and the prisoner was fully committed. POLICE. CAUTION TO HACKNEY COACHMEN. HATTON-GARDEX.—VeSterday Mirky Hiscar, driver of the hackney-coach, No. was brought before the Sitting Magistrate, charged with the following outrage and offence against the S geute: Parker, a street-keeper in Doswell-street Road, stated that on Thursday last the prisoner stopped his coach close to the foot pathway, at the tipper end of Ooswell.street, and although there was plenty of room on the stand close by, refused to move until he thought proper. Witness told him that he was ordered to take out a summons tor every coachman so offending, and proceeded ti take his number, which so irritated the prisoner that he swore he wtmld run over him, and actually turned his horses' itcads to put h;s .h.eat in execution, at the same time swearing that he neither cared for :11agistrate nor summons, for he knew the law as well as they. Wit ness was considerably injured by his violence. During this alter eation another coach drove on the stand, and occupied the place where the prisoner's mach might have stood, on the unlucky driver of which he turned all his fury, the stand having now its regular number of coaches. James Thomson, another h?ckney-coach driver, said that he drove on to the stand when there was just room for one coach, but had been there but a very few minutes when he was ordered off by Iliscost, who, on his refusal to move, drove his coach close along. side of him, and commenced a violent attack with his whip on both him and hishorsm, . _ The Magistrate said, for his offence against the Statute, coupled with his insolent and violent behaviour, he should fine him 40s. and costs. The assault on the coachman might be made a subject of after consideration. fliscox declared his innbility to pay the tine, and was forthwith ordered to the House of Correction for one month. ROBBERY OF STONEMASONS' TOOLS. Two fellows who gave their names Gas , Ain. and Saunders, were charged by a parish officer of St. Jame4's,Clerken well, with steal ing a quantity of stonemasons' tools from an unfinished house in Francis -street, Oray's-Inn-lane. A person pained Wakeman, keeping a marine store-shop in Great Warner-street, said that about eight o'clock that morning one of the prisoners called and asked if they bought tools, and on being answered in the affirmative, went away. In about an hour the two prisoners came together, bringing tv itft them a parcel of stone-masons' chisels, for which they received 2s. 40. and left the I shop. Shortly after they were gone, the principal part of the arts. Iles were found to bear Mr. Cubitt's name, and an officer was sent for, to whom a description of the prisoners was given. The constable stated, that from the description given him by Mrs.AVaketnan, he thonght he knew the prisoners, and about ten o'clock he found them both together, smoking and drinking at the Red Lion, in Rosornan.street, and took them into custody. They told him they had found the tools. Dennis Kelly, a stone-mason in the employ of Mr. Cubitt, buihler, of Gray's. Inn-Lane, said that he left them safe over-night in a bag in the back kitchen of a house In Francis-street, where he was nt work, covered with two paving stones, and on going to work the next morning the bag only remained. They were worth a dozen shillings to any purchaser. The prisoners declared they found them in Wilmington-square, covered with straw, that morning. The Magistrate said they most convince the Jury of 'hat, for he should certainly send them for trial. Ile could not help saying that it looked rather suspicious, when tools, proved to be worth 12s. to a purchaser, were bought fur 2s. 40., and he would advise pur chrvers to he cautious how they acted in future. The facility with which articles stolen could be got rid of was an excitement to crime. They were then fully committed for trial. A POOR WARRANT. MAttLIIOROUCITT-STBEET.—Ann Hogan, a little middle-aged Irishwoman, who had hung about the (Alice for several days to get an opportunity of asking the advice of the Magistrates, yesterday succeeded in her endeavour by the following stratagem:—She, about four months since, parted from a man who had lived with her very contentedly while she had earned the means of their sub s'stence ; but finding he was for all-play while she was hard ut work, resolved to leave him ; but ever since he has followed and threatened her, because she would not return to him. Last Friday night he came to her place, and threatened her so furiously, that she was phtige4 to make her escape over the tops of several houses, and lake refuge in the glom of a neighbour's house- She had' applied to several of the officers, who were all too busy to attend to THE ARMY. The 2d battalion of the Coldstream Guards embarked on Mon day at Liverpool, for The 2d battalion of the Grenadier Regiment of Guards. having been relieved in I)ublin by the 2d battalion of the Co ldsulani Guards, was expected to arrive at Liverpool yesterday, where it is directed to remain till further order.. Two companies of the 17th Regiment of Infantry have arrived et Liverpool from Scotland, and marched far Preston. JCVENTLE DEPRAVIry.—A dimhiutive urchin of eight or nine years of age was brought up the other day at Voila hall, for purloining sonic trifling articles. Thetwisted phis of this rising candidate for the honours of the Old Miley gave unequivo cal symptoms of qualities which will, no doubt, place him in Cue time at the top of the tree. He had been sfrret4red, and was of come up to all the ways of the town. It was no OM for his father to handcuff and confine him, as he did once foe three days. Coe ur rection had no effect ;it was persecution. arid kke a pSo lishman, he would pc rsist in any thing if he was beat for The e M' it os rather begged of the alt with tears, to seri to :n Mm some place of confineeat, where he might perhaps be induced to discor.tinue and forget his criminal propensities. Mister would not go to gaol for want of crying ; but all remarks which mailed to produce a proper sense of his conduct were met with a sulky cal lousness. Ile confessed that he took the articles and sold them to another boy for three halfpence ; but as thee had not been tracetl, the Alagistrate contented himself with remanding him. BIRTHS. On the 21st inst., at Knowsley. in Lancashire, the seat of the Earl of Derby, the lady of the lion. Edward O. Stanley, M.P., was safely delivered of a son and heir. At Hightury Park, on the 21st inst., hits. Davidson, of a seal. On Saturday, the 22d inst., at harrow-upon-Trent, In the county of Derby, the Llon. Beaumont, of a son. On the 19.11 Instant, at Rounderoft Cottsi,,T, CLeshunt. the lady of Artemidorus Cromwell Russell, L 19.„ of a daughter. MA RRIED. Oa Monday, at St. George's, Hanover-agnate, Herbert lisp, Esq., to Jossica Matilda, daughter of S. J. Arnold, Boa. On the 2-itli in It., at St. Bowl* Bishomate, lts. %V. Stems, of Bishopsgate-street, to Mrs. Jane Bishop, of Citt-terrace. DIED. On the 23d inst., in OM Burlington-street, Carouse, yeupPit daughter of .1. H. Waddiitgton, Esq , aged 14. On Sunday, the 23d inst., in Tayistock.rlace, Raisell.aquar: , Mts. Sarah Fenn, aged 79. On the 21st Mary Anne, the wife of the Bev. T. G. Tyn dale, Hector of Holton, Oxterdeliire. Enda tATER. Tllls PAY AT LONDON /111 1 mllltE ifter. Motility .. min. after 6 I Evening 5 • _ _L ;4rtivi aartisn #a tot 4 Office, by d. NV, C A 11. 1 .011,, No. Shand, and published by R. CANNON, sift* pimpf. 4.0- -..--- I hen 1 (;n 8 21 as a Ah 814 the the wit --• 1 ey' 4 1 lit I'm hal GI tnT phi ~., ile fm th of ill 11 IC I 1 i; 6 .4. 1f r .7 I,