The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-06-21 00:00:00

r 1 NI ' Pi j II ) I 1 LAW INTELLIGENCE. 1 1! I COURT OF LINO% ISENCII, Elervapalr, Jams I. SAE [ISO v. JOBS newt. This w an Indictment against the defendant foe printing and publishing a libel, called " the Vision of Judgment,' of which the late Lord Byron was the author, In a a periodical work , calle d " The Liberal." The prosecution was conducted by " the Con stitutional Association.** It was alleged in the indictment that the libel was intended to vilify the memory of his late Majesty, Oewrge 111., and thereby to wound the feelings of his present Majesty sud the Royal Family. At the trial before the Lord Chief Justice. At the sittings after last Michaelmas term, the defendant was found yoilty, and had been attending every term since then to receive udgment. .Mr. A poi.rtirs (with wham RSA Mr. Coleridge, for the prose cution) now prayed the judgment of the Court. Mr. Hunt immediately appeared on the thior of the Court. The Lout) CHIEF JUSTICE then read his notes of the trial. After which, Mr tzcsit LETT rose and said, he had to submit to the conside ration of the Court, whether the defendant was not entitled to a Lew trial. fly the roles of the Court an application for a new trial ought to be matte within the first four days of the !erin after the tisst trial took place. The rearm why this app . ...cation was not wade sooner, was, that Air. Hunt was not aware of this rule; and. therefore he, Alr. tcarlett, having received no instructions upon the subject in time, he had had no opportunity of communicating with his cheat until he saw him in Court, in consequence of the motion on • fomnr occasion, on the part of the prosecutors, to bring him up for judgment. As soon as he saw Mr. Hunt he then suggested to him that he thastght it was proper that a mo tion for a new trial should be submitted to the Court. In criminal proceedings the Court were in the habit of entertaining such a motion, when the party was brought up for judgment after hearing the Judge's report; and, therefore, he had reserved the motion until this occasion, trustire that, in this instance. the Court would extend their usual induft,.ce. The ground of his motion related to the manner in which the case was left to the J ur y b y the Lord Chief Justice. The Loan CHIEF JUST ICE-1 left it to the Jury tosay whether they thought this publication was not merely defamatory of the suemory of his late Majesty, but also whether it was not calculated and intended to disturb the peace and wound the feelings of his Invent 3lejesty and his family. M. SCA admitted that his Lordship had so left the cue to tee Jury ; but he submitted that the case deserved some further torsederation in two points of view; first, whether the defendant must ov presumed to have intended that which was the consequence e' his own act (which was the way in which the Jury had been di rected by the learned ;lodge); and second, assuming that to be a jest rule of construction, whether the libel in question was pm. p, tly the subject of prosecution, considering the political station and character of the exalted personage to whom it related. With respect to the that point, he had at the trial desired the whole of the poem in question to be read in evidence, for the purpose of showing that the real object of the author was not to slander the memory of the late Sovereign. or wound the feelings of the present; but merely to bring into ridicule a work published by another au th or , in which 'the most fulsome and unqualified panegyric was pronounced on every act and measure of the late reign. The Loren Cutts! JUSTICE—There was no evidence of the publication of any such work. Mr. SCAR I.b:TT said, it was alluded to in the poem in question, and therefore he thought it unnecessary to lay it before the Jury, to whom he gave credit for having some knowledge of the ordinary events of the age, and fur understanding the general tenor of the publication. It was impossible that any work could be prosecuted, or successfully defended, unless its whole contents were under. stood. In this ease, the poem was in hexameter verse, and repro tented a mock trial, in contrast with that which was puurtrayed to the work of another author; and it was with the view of showing, that the hole abject was to satirise that work, and not to libel the late King, or wound the feelings of his present Majesty. that he de sired the whole of the poem in question to be read in evidence. Ile admitted, that if a man should write a poem, or other work, with out direct design of wounding the feeling of a reigning Monarch, or should compose a studied panegyric upon a dead Monarch, and I place his virtuous actions in such a light as must shew an intention to insult the living Monarch, he would be punishable. But framed as this indictment was, he submitted that there was no possible, mains of , Proving, that the author of this work me ant to wouitil the feelings o f his present !Unity. Indeed, he thought it unreasonable to suppose, that his present Majesty's feelings could be wounded hr any renew of the public or private character of his late Majesty.l 'l be point which he submitted to the Jury • was, that there was' no evidence whatever, that the work in question could have been I written with the design of giving pain to his pres ent Ma j est y 's feelings. Whether it was calculated to produce well an effect, or not, ass not the question ; but whether such was the defendant's fstention. The Jury were told by the Learned Judge, that they must suppose, that every man intends that which is the cense quence of his own act. Now, he (31r. S.) denied the fact, that every man must he )renamed to intend that which is the cooae queoce of his own acts. This was too narrow a proposition. No man could be presumed to intend that which is the consequence of Its ars, unless that consequence is obvious, and necessarily flows from the act. The Cuter Juse let —I have no note of the manner in which I left the case to the Jury ; nor have I any distinct memory of what I said to them ; but I have no doubt I used some such expressions as these—'• That every man must be presumed to intend the natural and ordinary consequences of his own act." Mr. SCARLETT submitted, that the consequences must be so obvious, as that no man endued with ordinary reason could mis take them. Many acts might be done by a man of which he could not possibly know the consequence'. A necessary consequence might flow from a particular act, and yet the party doing the act might not at all intend to accomplish the object attained. If a man is to be prnunied to intend all the consequences of his act, why, a trtemorial, a remonstrance, or a petition, might be punished as a libel, because some passages contained in it were calculated to give pain to the person to whom it was addressed. The consequence , of the act must therefore be so obvious, so inevitable, and so ma nifest, as toleave no room to doubt that the party intended it, before he is to he made criminally liable. Then, secondly, admitting that in the case of a private individual, whose feelings were wounded by slandering the memory of his ancestor, the author of a libel of that kind would he criminally . responsible, yet he sub mitted that the same reasoning would be inapplicable in the case of a Monarch. Conceding, as no doubt he must, that a King on the throne is endued with the feelings of ordinary nien (though he was bound to declare that those were not the best applicable to the monarch of a country), yet his feelings would be naturally tempered with a due regard to be' own station, and to the necessity and pro. pricey of public opinion, and feeling, respecting his deceased prede cessor ; and therefore he was not placed in such a situation as to be affected by any representation of the character and conduct of his immediate enema, as a private individual might be. Ile Cllr. Scariest) must own. as his candid and sincere opinion, that by placing this indictment on the tiles of the Court the prosecutors had offered one of the greatest insults to the King of this country, that was ever offered to any monarch. It was a statement on record, by private prosecutors, who had taken upon themselves the protee tion of *the reigning family of this country, that his late Majesty's mien was attended with mach bloodshed, and waste of treasure, and that such a representation of the character of that reign gave great pain to the present Sovereign and his family ; it was stating that private feelings were mixed up with his late Majesty's poli. trial conduct ; it was stating that it was a high offence to their reigning Sovereign, that any man in the realm of England should presume to give any opinion respecting the political history of his prodectessor's reign, and that any observation which aeproximated to any thing like blame or imputation upon his tither, was so offensive to him, that he was desirous of punishing the offender by the strong amt of the law. Such a description of the feelings and character of the reigning Sovereign, as his true character, he must say, was a gross imputation upon the King. He (Mr. Scarlett) would lay down no role as to the limits within which a writer might I range in discussing the character of a deceased Sovereign ; but this he would venture to affirm, that if a discussion upon the cha. man s dead King was criminal, because it wounded the feel. ings of a living monarch, all history, as well as all poetry, must 'crate. • Such a consequence would deeply affect the interests of mankind ; it would be productive of the greatest calamities to the human lace. If the successor of a Sovereign is to be placed in such a situation as that his ear is to hear nothing of the private character of his predee or of the opinion which his subjects entertain of it, then history must be panegyric and fulsome flittery. Should a rule be laid down, that whatever is incidentally calculated to give pain to a living monarch is criminal, it was ini. Feasible to say where that rule was to have a limit. Where was the I,cence-of history to coinmeoce ? It not with the father of a King, the crohibirion oath:extend to his grandfather, and great - grand. lusher, or any remote ancestor. Atter calling the attention of the Coun to the triune, object, and character of the work in question, ha submitted, rm.:, that the Jury were not bound to presume that I the defendant intacied the consequences of his own act, unless the intention was manifest ; and second, that the OMR of a sovereign beingdifferent from that of a private individual, a publication of this nature was privileged. The LORD (*DIET JrSTIOE said, that one of the inconveni eases of making this motion et so late a period was, that his Lord ship had now forgotten the precise manner in which he had left the case to the Jury. The trial took place on the Irsh January last ; but, according to his revellection, he left it to the Jury to say, whether they considered this publication as tending to wound the feelings of his present Majesty. He put to them the whole inten tion charged. Perhaps Mr. Adolphus had a note of die manner in which he left the caee to the Jury. Mr. Meteorites replied, that other hesinesa had called him away from the Court before his Lordship'ssumming up. Mr. COLERIDGE said, that .Mr. Panora had held his brief at the trial, and took a note of his Lordship's address to the Jury. Mr. PATTESON then read his note of the I.oed Chief Justice's *summing up, which was in substance, that his Lordship had no difficuity in telling the Jury, that to publish written calumny re. stinting his tate 3lajeety, wasa Ebel; it was for them to say who. thee the matter in question was published with the intention int. puted. In deciding this question, they . were to exercise their own Judgment, and decide fearlesely : Adverting to the circumstance, that this prosecution was carried on by private individvals. his Losiehip observed, that the only way in which that mad be con sidered as favourable ty the defendant sae, that possibly the Co v,?ruitnent would have prosecuted the work, had they thought it libellous. Ilia Lordship said he should be wanting to his station if lie del rot expresslis abhorrence of the imputations contained in the work respecting his late Majesty. 'Whether the other poem alluded to contained any thing to call forth what appeared in the work he question. his Lortl.!up could not say, because he had been brought up in ton eevere a teete to reed Such works, even if his judicial labeurs afforded him leisure for such a purpose. In con clusion, he left it to the Jury to say, first, whether this teak was calculated to injure the Mallory of the late King; and, second, whether it was lntended to wound the feelings of t h e p resent King? Mr. Justice BATLEY delivered as his opinion, that the case *al eroperly , _left to the Jury, and that there was no geoiind, for anew trial. He had no difficulty in saying, in point aria*, that a man must be understood to intend that which must natmilly molt from his own act. This publication was naturally calculated to wound the feelings of the King and the Royal Family, and there , fore the defendant must be presumed to have that object in view. I Fair discussion upon the character and conduct of Kings ought to be protected ; but privileged discussion was that which was founded upon the statement of real facts, not a conclusion drawn without premises or facts, to support it. Her. the libel contained the strongest reflections upon the late King , and charged hint, amongst other offences, with being the greatest foe to freedom. Such a publication Was calculated to wound the fee lin g s of the pre sent Sovereign end the Roy ht conclu s ion , there al Famil. and therefwas no ore, thin reason that the Jury hail drawn the rig for, disturbing the verdict. Mr. Justice 110LROYD and Mr. Justice LITT LEDALE were of the same opinion. The LORD Cuter JUSTICE expressed his surprise that this motion should have been made, because , according to his reco- lection of his summing up, he had presented the case to the minds of the Jury in a manner the most favourable to the defendant. Admitting that some part of the publication in question was in., tended as an answer to another work, by another author, and that certain fictitious characters were supposed to be speaking, yet there were some parts of the poem in which the poet spoke in his own proper person. That his Majesty must have felt strongly these imputations upon the character of his father, might be fairly judged trout his Majesty's Motto at the late coronatiou-- " Propel . ° jam jure online peterno." Rule fur a new trial refused. An affidavit Was then put in on behalf of Mr. Hunt, in which he stated that lie had wholly ceased to publish the Literal, which had been discontinued; but that, with the consent of the Noble Author, he intended to publish a new edition of the Vision Judgment, expung ing those passages which were stated in this in dictment to be li bellous. Ile had the authority of the Noble Author fey stating that the work in question had been composed and published as an answer to another publication, in English hexameters, bearing the saute title, of which Robert Southe, was the author, in whose work adubition, almost amounting to profaneness, was bestowed upon his late Majesty's reign. That the object of the Noble Author was neither to libel his late Ma jesty, nor to give pain to his present Majesty, but to give a jug picture of that memorable reign, contrasting it with the principles of true government under a limited monarchy. The Loao Cuter' JUsTiCE asked if there were any affidavits for the prosecution ? Mr. ADoLPHUS put in some affidavits, but upon considesation withdrew them. The Loan CIIIT.F JUSTICE then desired to know if Mr. Scar lett had any thing to address to the Court ? Mr. SCACLETT declined saying a thing. Mr. A1)01.'111.11; then shortly ad dressed the Court. With re spect to the libel, the Learned Judge in his summing up, and the Jury by their verdict, had pronounced its character. It was far from bin wish to press hard upon any individual standing before the Court for judgment, but he could nut help observing, that it was a gteat mistake with respect to the liberty of the press, to suppose, that if any individual, living or dead, should happen to be too highly praised by his friends or admirers, it was competent for a public writer to take up every thing that a venomous spirit could devise, to point him out to the odium and execration of posterity. If a man's tomb-stone be no protection to his memory, better that be die and be forgotten at once, than that the praises of his friends shall draw upon him the malice and defamation of his enemies. He would allow that the character of a King was public property, and was justly open to fair criticism ; but if no regard were paid to his private feelings, his high station would not give him that pro. teetion which the law afforded even to the meanest subject. Of the author of the work in quest? 'ii, he would say nothing; his name could only be mentioned with sorrow ; be was gone to his own judgment since its publication, and therefore his situation for bade him making any severe reflections upon his memory. He (Mr. A.) had only to pray the Court to pronounce such a judgment us would be sufficient to protect the interests and feelings of his Majesty, without pressing a ith unnecessary severity on the de felidant. Mr. COLERIDGE, on the same side, said, he should not have said a word. but fur the allusion to his friend Mr. Southey, whose name had been mentioned. A more independent or upright man I did not live, and he should be wanting in duty to him if he did not bear public testimony to his character. Mr. SCARLET! said, that he had not even mentioned the name Of Mr. Southey ; and certainly nothing which tell from his lips could be construed into disrespect towards that gentleman. He spoke only of his publication, not of his name or character. The COURT proceeded to consider the sentence. . Mr. Justice BATLEY pronounced the sentence of the Court in terms to the following effect:—" John Hunt, the Jury found you guilty of printing and publishing the libel now before the Court. Tbe Court have no reason to suppose that you are the author of the porn which you so printed and published ; they imagine that you printed and published it with other views; that your object was, a great degree, pro fi t. The Court, looking at the title of the pub lication as well u such portion of the contents as have been more particularly selected far our notice as well as that of the Jury, cannot help expressing their disapprobation of the libel, and th eir deep regret that any circumstauces should have induced you to publish it. It is nut necessary for me to make any comments on it ; the Court cannot view it as resulting from the spirit of fair discussion or allowable satire. In your affidavit, you say that you are about to prepare a new edition of this work, with other pro ductions of the same author, but that in such re-publication you shall expunge those passages which the Jury pronounced to be libellous. lam not aware of all the contents of this work. There may be other passages equally objectionable with those brought Wore the Court; it, therefore, you republish the work, even omitting the passa g es now specia ll y pointed out to the Court, you will bear in mind that you do so at your peril- Sbouldyou re- I publish any part of the work, and should any of the passages in such republication be complained of, and brought before the Court, after this warning, the Court will know how to deal with you for such offence. The sentence of the Court on you, John Bunt, for your present offence , is, that you do pay to the King fine of 1001.; that you enter into sureties for five years, yourself in 1,0001. and two sureties in 500!. each and that you be imprisoned in the custody of the Marshal of th e Marshalsea till such fine be paid, and such sureties given." The defendant paid the tine, entered with two friends into the required securities, sad was discharged.] COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, SATURD►Y, JUNE 19. FROMONT COI:PLASM • This was an action brought to recover the sum of 2001. due to the plaintiff, as rent for some premises hired by the defendant. It appeared that these parties had once been in partnership in run ning a torch from Bath to London, the profits of each party bring calculated according to the numbe r of miles covered by his own horses. There was a sum of 25fJ. due to the defendant on the partnership account, and this sum he claimed to set off against the present demand. The Chief Justice, at the trial, determined that a partnership debt could not form the subject of a set-off in this action t and the Jury accordingly gave a verdict for the plaintiff. A motion was now made to set aside that verdict, and to enter a nonsuit ; but the Court saw no reason to disturb the verdict, and the motion was therefore refused. EVERETT AND oTm:l9 2•. EIRE. This was an action on a bond, in which the defendant had be come surety for 3lr. George lkwhon lainwaring, under the fol lowing circumstances:— The plaintiff's. who formed the banking-house of Everett and Co., were interested as shareholders in a Company called the Stone Pipe Company, to which they were also Treasurers. To , this Company they had made considerable advances, which then • remained unliquidated to the amount of 16,0001. They then lent their names to • Company intended to be formed for the pur pose of supplying London, Westminster, and their environs, with ` spring water, called the Rayswattr Spring-water Company, to which they also became Treasurers. The number of shares in t h e Spring. water, Company was 66 of 1001. each, most of which were rammed by the plaintiffs, who subsequently sold them out to dd . - ; ferent indivividuals, and, among the rest, Mr. Alainwaring agreed to become a purchaser of twenty-two shares ; to secure payment of which the defendant became his surety. To the bond given for this purpose, it was recited, that the instalments of each share-holder were ••• to be paid up forthwith ; " and the present action was brought for non-fulfilment of that stipulation. Both the Compa nies ultimately tailed ; but lung before that event wok place, the plaintiff's (who had not then paid up more than 301. on each share they held) prevailed on the Spring-water Company to purchase the pipes of the Stone.pipe Company which they did to the amount of ;,00tH. By this purchase, the delat due from the titone.pipe Com pany to the plaintiffs was paid off as they received the purchase money, and appropriated it in payment of the debts of the Stone. pipe Company, so tar as it would answer that purpose. The Spring. water Company, soon after this purchase, became very much em barrassed, and the plaintiffs then paid up the instalments on their own shares by transferring the aunts in their books as Treasurers. The Company was finally broken up by a distress for rent to the amount of about 2001. being levied upon them. Mr. 3lainwaring not having paid up his shares, and having quitted the country, the plaintiffs came upon the defendant as his surety. The defend ant contended that these two Companies were mere speculations or bubbles, and that the plaintiffs had not in reality paid up more than 30/. upon each of their shuts, to which extent only he admit ted himself to be liable. The Jury, however, returned a verdict fur the plaintiff, to the full amount claimed. A rule having been obtained in the course of the preceding Term, to set aside that verdict, it now came on for argument. The Collar, without calling on the plaintiffs Counsel to chew muse. were of opinion that the dere:Want was liable on his bond, and that the transfor of money in the plaintiff's books was a payment of their instalments so as to ustify them in calling or the defendant. Rule discharged. TwYrizim v.S,TIALLCROTT., This was a motion to amend the declaration filed in this case, which was an action on a warranty a a horse. The plaintiff had stated the warranty to be for a horse " warranted sound," and he now wiNhed to add another count on a warranty " for a good draught horse." The COURT granted a rule to phew canto on the terms of the plaintiff's paying the costs, and permitting the defendant to plead de aut•u. DEATII sr ACCIDENT.—A carman, named Regan, was killed on Tarsilay last, in the town of Skibbereeri, in consequence of his tart, which' was 1.u1 , 11 with a piece of thuher. upsetting, whereby all feel on the unfortunate owner ; the poor fellow was taken up bruised in a shucling manuer.—Dublis Paper. POLICE. MANSION-HOUSE. Heuvronnstatiar RonoraT.--Sottudal " 61 " mhtfidd , who has been several timer examined an suspicion of being con cerned in the above robbery, was seat down to Hertford, m cos- I tody of an officer, to undergo an emsnination before the Magis trates there. • BOW.STREET. On Saturday John O. Metier, a patrol on this establishment, came to the Office quite tintnk, with four respectable tradesmen. his prisoaers, on a charge of " desiring" to drink more beer than ' would do them good. Sir RICHARD BURNIE dismissed the complaint, and most pro. perly discharged Butler front his situation for preferring one so fri volous and vexat;ous. CIVET. TREATRIF.NT TO A PARTSII ArenErrtcz.--Bond, the officer, brought up an interesting little girl, twelve years old. who ran away from her apprenticeship last Thursday week, and who had not been heard of by het t..ouress or her mother `from that time until the carer found he: on Saturday , at Ill'ilsden Green. Harriet Edwards, the apprentice, was sworn, and stated that, about six months ago she was bound, by the officers of St. artin's,in.the- fields to 11l tr. Hanson, of l'ummill-street, Clerkenwell, to learn the businessof fancy flower-making ; that from that time to last Thursday week her mistress was in the habit of beating her most cruelly with a cane on all parts of her body ; and on that day she beat her severely with the cane, threw her down, and kicked her. In her fall her face came against the fender, by which her eye was seriously in jured, evi lent marks of which still appeared. On last Thursday week, after she was beaten as described, her mistress sent her out with sixpence to purchase something, which she lost ; she was then afraid to return home, and she met her sister, who took her with her to Wilsden Green, where she remained until the officer brought her to town. Mr. blt sSITI'I.T., upon learning that 31rs. Field (the mother of the child) would take her home to her own house, cancelled the indenture, and bound Mrs. Hanson in 40/., and two sureties in 2W. each, to answer tor her conduct st the Sessions. BIARLBOROI36II-STREET. On Saturday Win. Minuets Robison, the Clerk of Dlr. Abra, hams, the solicitor, of No. 6, Great Itlarllxwough.street, against whom there have been preferred six distinct charges of felony, was this day brought before Mr. DYER, the Magistrate, for final exami. nation. Upon the examination on Wednesday last, the evidence respect , ing the identity of the prisoner was in some cases very doubtful, and in others contradictory ; and his friends, who are persons of the highest rope:lability. are still convinced of his being mistaken for some other person, and consequently of his innocence of the va rious offences imputed to him. tso satisfied is Mr. Abrahams, the master of the vrisoner, of his innocence, and that that sad mis. fortune has betallen him through his striking resemblance of an. other person. that he has, silica the last examination, made the greatest exertions to obtain evidence to exculpate the prisoner, and he states that he has been very successful, and shall be able, in three of the cases, to prove an alibi, by testitnony the most clear _ and sati.factory. Before 12 o'clock Mr. Abrahams was in attendance before tlr. Data, and the prisoner, who had been confined in a private room at the house of Mr. Noildote the Governor of Tothill.fields prison, soon afterwards arrived in a coach. Several gentlemen who are connected with the family of the poi. soner came forward to speak to his respectability and good conduct, and represented that the prisoner could have no motive or indicernent in committing such an otfenee, as he was a ward In Chancery, pos sessing a handsome income, and, on arriving at age, would be en titled to some thousands of pounds. Before the examination commenced, Sir Peter Laurie, the Sheriff of London, entered the (Ace, and took his seat on the bench. Ile gave testimony of the respectability of the prisoner and his friends, and expressed his opinion that the young gentleman was not guilty of the charges. Sir Peter observed, that there was nothing remark able about the prisoner's face, though his dress and appearar.ce was moo: fashionable and gentlemanly. The prisoner was then brought into the office, and placed at the bar. Ile was attired, as on the last examination, in a blue coat, buff waistcoat, and duck trowsers. His hair is very light, cut quite in the mode. There was no want of confidence in his manner. The Magistrate asked if there were any other charges against the prisoner, and wss answered in the negative. Mr. Abrahams proposed so Mr. Ire Eft, to call witnesses with whom the prisoner dined and spent the evening on the day lie was charged with entering two different shops, and decamping wi:h property. Mr. Dela said, that he could not try the nee ; the prisoner had been sworn to, in the most positive manner, and the evidence pro. posed to be called would be very important no the trial. Mr. Abrahams said, that he hoped, under all the circum stances, tlxit bail would have been accepted ; and he was ready to give security for the prisoner's appearance to any amount. Blr. Dent said, that front conversations with his brother Ma. gistrates, the opinion he originally had entertained, that he ought not to accept of hail, was strongly fortified. He thought it would be an excess of his duty to take bail In a case of capital felony, when there was a strong suspicion of guilt ; and he could not ho nestly say, that there did not appear to him strong proof of the pri soner's guilt Notwithstanding this opinion. he hoped the prisoner I would be able to make his innocence manifest upon the trial ; he would rather have avoided giving his opinion as to the guilt or in-' riocence of the accused, as it might tend to prejudice him hereafter; bat he felt bound to give his reason for not accepting hail. Mr. Abrahams, however, knew that another tribunal, the King's Bench, was open to him; and If it should be thought proper by the pri soner's friends, an application might be made to that Court, or to a Judge, to bad him. The prisoner was then ordered to be fully committed to New. gate for trial. Sir Peter Lanrie said, that be would take care to arrange with Mr. Wanner, the Keeper of Newgate, that a room should be pro vided for the prisoner's use, disconnected with the prisoners con , fined in the gaol. Tao gentlemen applied to the Magistrate to be allowed to at. 'company the prisoner and the officer who had hint in custody, in coach, to Newgate. The Magistrate granted the order. Wm. Alforphy and Charley Gibling, the two men who on Tuesday last were charged with a fraud on Fitzroy Kelly, Esq. of Queen -square. in the sale of a home to that gentleman. the parti culars of which case appeared in the Morning Papers of Wednes day, and who were remanded to Saturday, were brought up for third examination ; Goddard, who wee the instigator to, and con triver of the fraud, did not appear to a summons that was issued )against him for Saturday. Mr. Kelly stated, that since Tuesday last a letter had been left at his house, unclosing fifty-five guineas, the sum which he paid for the horse; and that in consequence of the prisoners being the mere instruments and tools' of Goddard, whom he regretted he could not l.y his hands on. he would not further peas the charge against them, having got back his money. The priseners were about to be discharged, when Col. Waller stepped forward, and said, that having seen in the Morning Papers of Wednesday the fraud committed on Mr. Kelly, he had to state that one of a similar description had been practiced on himself by the self same party, whom he immediately recognised on seeing them at the bar. He some time back pure-hued a horse from the prisoner Murphy, who described himself to hint as he had done to Mr. Kelly. Ile represented the horse as a thorough.breg Leices tershire hunter, which lie amid warrant free from all blemish, and ' asked sixty-five guineas for him, which he (the Colonel) paid hint, but in some time after he had the mortification to discover that he had been completely done, as the home was not worth five pounds. From an error in the agreement made between the Colonel and Murphy, Mr. Roe, the sitting Magistrate, was of opinion that the Colonel would not be able to estaulish a case of fraud against the prisoners. Here Mr. Kelly interposed, and declared that the fraud practised on the Colonel was as barefaced as the on e . practised on himself, and declared it to be his positive determination, notwithstanding his now consenting to the diecharge . of the prisoners, for the reason he stated, that it the sixty-five guineas were not paid back to the Colonel before the end ef the Seasons, he would indict the pri soners for the fraud on himself. Ile well knew the league they were in with Goddard, and that his (Mr. Kelly's) money was sent him by that fellow ; so that he was fully determined, as far as in hint lay, that Colonel Waller should also have his back. This threat bad such an effect on Murphy, that he offered to pass the Colonel his bond, payable at monthly instalments, fur the 65 guineas. Mr. Kelly, who laughed heartily at the idea of his (Murphy's) bond, told him that he should not slip through his fingers in that way, so that he had better, between this and the time he pointed out, get Goddard. who was the Captain of the gang, to refund the 65 guineas, or he might depend upon it that he would carry his finest into execution. The prisonere, in no small degree alarmed at this determination of Mr. Kelly, were then discharged. THAIIES-OFFICE. Joseph Shepherd and Joirothme Barron were on Saturday last placed at the bar of this offiee before J. W. Broderip, Eaq. the pre. siding Magistrate under the following . circumstances : Charles Caren, a surveyor, belonging to this establishment de. that, on Saturday morning, about eleven o'clock, he fol- Cr e e d' the • Barron into a dealer's shop, on Brook-hill, Clerkenw and there saw him offer fur sale 21) pound of . pewter, run down, and 6 pound which was not. The witness inquired of the 'prisoner how he became possessed of it, and he answered, that is not a fair question ; the witness then said, I know you, you conic from Mr. Shephenl'e (meaning the prisoner Shepherd) who is a dealer in maringeitores, and resides et Cow.cross. The prisoner rephed,ou appear to know ell about it; what you have I said is true. M , itness then went to Shepherd's, and required to be told, by a reference to his book, how he came by the pewter. Shepherd said he did not keep any book. The Magistrate told the prisoner, Shepherd, the not doing so subiected him to a penalty. Shepherd's account as to his possession of the pewter was anything but satisfactory, and the Magistrate convicted him in the penalty of 31.. and in default, to be imprisoned for two months. Barron was reptimanaKel, end discbarged. TO N.II A LL. JEALOVSY.—The wife of a tortoiseshell comb-maker, in the vicinage of Blackfriars-mid, appeared to answer the complaint of her *cream maid, Maria W'catcoinbe, for an assault. The coin ' plainant was short of stature, and with very lice other than youth to recommend her. She lived servant in the family of the de- Ifendant. The day before yesterday her matser and mistress had company, and the crockery was in high demand ; some slight omission on her part, in handing the different services to her mis. tern, brought down her displeasure upon her with such severity, that she knocked her down with the spit, got her fingers into her mouth and bit them severely, calling her by the most infamous names ap. plicable to a female. The Leda, on being called en for her defence, with considerable agitation said, she had taken the complainant, " a poor dirty, de. plorable object," into 'lie house front compassion, and bid, foe be humanity, the base retain of being stung by the viper _she had non. fished, who had inveigled her husband into a ba and shame- Int amour with her. She (the defendant) was obliged to do the work of the house, while her husband's minion was pampered above stairs, and encouraged to insolence and blows against her, as militaries to the beatings he himsclf inflicted three or four times a-week. The husband, who was present, denied that suet was the Cu.; and said that all the evils arose from the insurmountable jealousy of his wife. The defendant was ordered to find ball for the assault. FROM SATURDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE. IVar-Office,June 12, 1824. His Alajeny has been please d to approve of the 30th foot bearing on its colours and appointments, in addition to any other badges or devices which may have heretofore been g ranted to that regiment, the words " Pyrennees," " Nlvelle," Nive," and " °rifles," in commemoration of the din inguished conduct of that corps in the Pyrennees, in the months ofJuly and August 1813 ; at Nivelle , on 10th November 1813; in the passage of the Nice, in the month of December 1813; and at Orthcs, on 27th February 1814. MILITARY PROMOTIONS. War-OAce, June 18.1824. 6th Regiment of Dragoon Guards—Lleutenant Gustavus Hume, from the 15th Light Dragoons, to be Captain, by purchase, vice Langley, who retires. 7th Regiment of Lig ht Dragoons—Ensign William Edwards, from the 46th Foot, to be Cornet, vice Richard Aird, who retires upon IC-pay 10th Foot. oth Ditto—Captain Henry Knight, from the 63d Foot, to be Captain, vice Paterson, who exchanges. 15th Ditto--Cornet William Gamier to be Lieutenant, by purchase, vice Hume, promoted in the 6th Dragoon Guards. Henry Thomas Lord Pelham to be Comet, by purchase, vice Gamier. 10th Regiment of Foot—Lieutenant Charles Murray, from the Ceylon Regiment, to be Lieutenant, vies Deacon, who exchanges. 18th Ditto—Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel G. Gorrequer to be Major. by purchase, vice Percival, who mires. Lieutenant C. French to be Captain, by purchase, vice Gone. quer. 31st Regiment of Foot Surgeon W. C. Callow, from the 90th Foot, to be Surgeon, vioe Shorland. who exchanges. 40th Ditto—Captam R. Moore, from half-pay of the Regiment, to be Paymaster, vice Phillips, dismissed the service. 41st Ditto—Lieutenant W. Barnes, from the 65th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice Ashe, who exchanges. 44th Ditto—Surgeon W. Daunt, M.D. front the 58th Foot, to be Surgeon, vice Jones, who exchanges. 40th Ditto—Ensign R. Kelley, from half-pay 10th Foot, to be Ensign, vice Edwards, appointed to the 7th Light Dragoons. 58th Ditto—Surgeon G. Jones, from the 44th Foot, to be Surgeon, vice Daunt, who exchanges. 00th Ditto—Lieutenant T. R. P. Tempest, from the 98th Foot, to he Lieutenant, vice Cornwall, appointed to the 76th Foot. 63:1 Ditto—Captain T. Paterson, from the Bth Light Dragoons, to be Captain, vice Knight, who exchanges. Lieutenant H. P. Foster, from half-pay Rifle Brigade, to be Paymaster, vice Jones, dismissed the Service. 65th Ditto—Lieutenant W. Astir, from the 41st Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice Barnes, who exchanges. 76th Ditto—Lieutenant H. Cornwall, from the 60th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice T. 11. Grubbe, who retires upon half-pay 74th Foot. 96th Ditto—Surgeon J. Shorland, from the 31st Foot, to be Surgeon, vice Callow, who exchanges. ' 98th Ditto—Lieutenant W. Freebaim, from half-pay 74th Foot, to be Lieutenant, vice P. Tempest, appointed to the 60th Foot. Lieutenant G. Dunlevie, from lhalf-pay 65th Foot to be Pay master. Ist West India Regiment—Lieutenant-Colonel F. F. Browne, front half-pay 6th West India Regiment, to be Lieutenant- Colonel, vice J. Cassidy, who exchanges. Ceylon Regiment—Lieutenant T. Deacon, from the 16th Foot, to , be Lieutenant, vice Murray, who exchanges. Commissions signed by the Lo►d Lieutenant of the County of Selkirk. A. Pringle, Esq. to be Vice-Lieutenant ; H. Scott, Esq., J. C. Scott, Esq., J. Pringle, Esq., and J. Johnstone, jun. Esq., to be Deputy-Lieutenants. BANKRUPTS. F. Fatton, Maddox-street, Bond-street, watch-maker, to sur render, June 26, at twelve, Julylo, at eleven, and 31, at ten, it the bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Messrs. Jones and Bland, Great JI ary-la-bone-street. J. Smith, Church-passage, Fenchurch-street, and Devonshire. square, Bishorgate-street, money-scrivener, June 26, July 3, and 31, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Aleuts. May and Boxer, Fumival's Inn, Holborn. J. Fairmaner, Alfred-mews, Tottenham-court-road, horse-dealer, June 26, at twelve, July !tat eleven, and 31, at ten, at the Bank rupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. Carlon, High-street, Mary-la•Bonnc. J. Duke, Basinglir.ll-street, warehouseman, June 22, 29, and July 31. at one, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. W. Fisher, Bucklershury. J. Drabwell, Great Russell-street, Bloomsbury, wine -merchant, June 26, at eleven, July 3, and 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Messrs. Ilinrich anti Stafford, Buckingham-street, Strand. W. Edwards, Blenheim.street. Bond-street, merchant, June 26, 29, and July 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. Coin, Wilson-street, Gray's Inn•road. W. Hale, Church-stmt, Spitadfields, cabinet-maker, June 26, July 3, and 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. J. Wilks, Finsbury place. T. Courthope, Rotherhithe, Surrey, boat-builder, June 26 July 3, and 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Colin. Solicitors, Alessi'. Young and {railings, St. Alildredli-court, Poultry. S. Benison, New Sleaford, Lincolnshire, mercer and draper, June 28. at five, 29, and July 31, at ten, at the Lion Hotel, tiles ford. Solicitors, Messrs. Forbes and Foster, gado:di and Mr. Lambert, Gray's Inn. P. Caulfield, Monkton, Pembrokeshire., auctioneer, June 28, 29, at ten, and July 31, at eleven, at the Green Dragon Inn, Pena broke. Solicitors, Mr. W. E. Payntcr, Pembroke; and Messrs. Williams and White, Lincoln's Inn. It. Campion, liorselydown-lane, Surrey, cooper, June 22, 29, at eleven, and July 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Mews. DAWN and Chatfield, Angel-court, Throgmorton-street. C. Austin, Luton, Bedfordshire, banker, June 26, July 3, and .11, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitors, Mr. Aubrey, Took'ecourt, Cursitor-strect. Chancery-lane; and Messrs. D. L. and J. Willis, Leighton Bussard, Bedfordshire. J• Noyes, Toole .street, oil and colourman, June 22, 29, at twelve, and July 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. C. Becke, lievonshirc-street, Queer -square. N. W. Symonds, C'rutched-Friars, merchant, July 3, at eleven, 10, and 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. Leigh, Charlotte-row, Mansion-House. W. Hall, Layton's-buildings, Southwark, merchant, July 3, at eleven, 6, and 31, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. Solicitor, Mr. Farris, Surrey-street, Strand. DIVIDENDS. July 17. F. King, Warwick, upholsterer, at twelve, at the Bank tpts' Court. July 14. S. U. White, Edingly cotton-mill, Nottingham, cotton pinner, at one, at the Swan Inn, 31anstield. July 30. R. Joetlaq, Salford, Lancaster, brewer, at three, at the Dog Tavern, Manchester. July 19. L. Pilsbury, Stafford, nurseryman, at eleven, at Mr. Seckerson's office, Stafford. June 22. C. Mayor, Somerset-street, Pre.--- at twelve, at the Bankrupts' Court. July 12. J. Patrick, Mary -la-bonne Bankrupts' Court. July le. J. Laughton, Arbour street. Com...— mariner, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. • July 24. T. A. Mann, Plymouth, linen - draper. at twelve, at the B a lOtrupta' Court. Jul) 10. W. Shsnds, Old•Cbange, baker, at twelve, at the Bankrwte Court. July 10. J. Callow, Princes-street, Soho, medical bookseller, at ten, at the V, inkrupts' Court. July 3. E. Vlackley, Wood.atrect, Chcapside, warehouseman, at ten, at the RankruPte Court. July 17. T. 11. Penny, Brighthelmstone, linen.draper, at twelve, at the Bankrupts' iiiUn• July 3. J. Pigram i Maidstone, grocer, at ten, at the Bankrupts' Court. u►Pester, linen.draper, at the CERTIVICATES.—JuLs W. Ellis, Liverpool, dre`e*.--G. D. Clark,Msrdn's.lans, Can non-street, merchant--F. Rs. iker, Manchester, cotton-manufac turer.—T. Halford, Bath, balt.m--W. Gramm, 13604 1 sugar' refmcr--E. Needham, inionaongur. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. M. Roebuck, G. Rosa, and D. Woe, Butcher-row, East Smith. field, wholesale-grocers, as far as resKets M. Roebuck.—J. Spink and E. Spiok, Seulcoates, York, plumb ers--.M. Pointer, syn., M. Pointer. Jun., and M. A. Hampton, Cluulton.Kings, Gloucester. shire.--J. Farbum and C. fairburn, {Vest House, AI irfield, York, card-makers.—J. King ar.d A. King, Liverpool, accountants.—R. Chawner and S. S. Allen, Burton.uponarent, surgeons.—G. Stokes and C. Wilson , Nottingham , machine-vnakers—W. Hasel den and J. Gibson, Liverpool, general-merchants.—C. Okill and W. °kill, Liverpool, accountants.—W. C:ark, E. Clark, and T. Chwk,Wolverhatupton, 'von-founders, as far as regards W. Clark. —J. Dayrie and A. Reg.Nudin, Great Wine:water-street, mer chants..-.4'. Lilly and W. dykes, Manchester, butehers.--W. George, A. George, A. George, A. M. Smith, and T. Phillips, Ponty hloile, !Romantik—G. Wiggins, W. Luke, and IL C. Cole, Threadneedle-street, merch.Wts.--T. Roy and G. Gaining, Upper East Smithfield, corn-deaLvs.—J. Lawford and A. S. Braithwaite, Bishopsgate.atreet. The average mice of Brown or filuscova 4' Sugar, computed from i tl r ie z r w. etu h r i n d s . m per ad h e u i n n dred the w w e eeigk h .iye duties of Customs paid or payable thereon on the importation thereof into Great Britain. ending eaclus t iv h : of ..41.h day June, 1824' Average price of Coen from the Returns received in the Week ending June 12, 1824. Wheat. I d. Barley. i eats. I Rye. I Beans. I Pees% s. d. a. it. d , s. d. s. d. s. I& 63 7 33 6 96 11 33 9 39 1 30 ' 1 ---- - We are informed, that a benevolcrt lady of this eNi has presented soul. to the fund for building the Church' Missionary Seminary, at Islington.—York Chronicle. SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. THE RING. AtiON AND MATIIEWSON.—These heroes will meet this di e to decide whether the Jew or the Gentile is the better man. B ee f, men are in excellent condition. The odds were tire to four on ' Aaron, but in the course of Saturday it was even betting, and five to four on Mathewson. The latter is about 9st. 916. weight; Aaron is rather more than 10st. so that he has in weight what the other has in science. _ _ WARD AND Saarrsox.—These big ones fight in the Wile titg with Aaron and Mathewson, and come to the scratch immediately after they have had enough. There . was some talk of postponi ng this fight for a week, in order to afford an opportunity for makin g some amends to the Warwickshire lads for their recent disappoi nt . went ; but it seems there was no certain guarantee for the " pyaid pro poe," and the articles remain as before. There is very Gid e lbating on the affair. The Fancy cannot forget past occurrences, and a hope is expressed that " all will be right." Those who e n d, to be in the ring must shape their course through Hyde Park Corner, Hounslow, &c. HVD3O7I AND CANNON.—The meeting of these men will take place on Wednesday, about 30 miles west of Hyde Park Wm. Josh is decidedly the favourite. MEETINGS' OF CREDITORS', AT TUE BANKRUPTS' COURT, UASIXGUALL•STRCET, TO-MORROW. THIND MEETINGS. R. atomises, C. Lower Cumming-street, Pentonville, merchant It Jackson, W. High Holborn, victualler Sandison,W : Cork -street, 11?tlington-gardene, tailor . Wood, H. J. and J. dashers . . Covent-garden, hither. SECOND MEETINGS. Courteen. R. Size-lane. dealer White, W. B. Strand, linen-draper - .1 1111 ST MEETIXI3II. _ Campion, It. Horseleydown, Surrey, cooper - - 11 Duke, J. Basinghall-street. warehouseman • • 1 Halliwell, W. ltunhill-row, hatter . is James, t 'atherire, widow, horsham, Sum:. innholdee - 10 Noyes, J. Tooley.street, Southwark, oil and coluurman . 12 kicatfe, J. F. Tokenhouse.yard, agent - • • 10 Tode, G. P. Regent-street, watchmaker . - 12 DIVIDENDS. Blair, G. and Plimpton, W. Lower Thames-street, seedsmen 1: Harrison, C. Aldgate, Iligh.streo, cheesemonger - 11 Holt, H. V. Cannon-row, Westminster, surgeon and apothe. ._ cary Howard, E. and Gibbs, J, Cork-strett, woncy-scritellCTS FISH-MARKET, JUNE, 20. - II Our Sunday market is nearly at an end for this sewn, and it might, to the benefit of the public, have closed long en t hi s . Mackerel are now in an ill state of health ; their spawn is beams vivified, and a great portion have already deposited their embryo The season has - been a long, as well as a very profitable met the coast, particularly to the northward, have reaped a plentiful her. vest. The fashionable, the epicurian, and judges of fish, have, for some time past, discontinued mackerel at their table. There were no fishmongers at market, but found plenty of nistotorrt among the strect.brawlers, at a cheap rate, being generally sula third day. :Mackerel this year has been universally oh. served to be short of flavour; this is attributed to the weather, which, when hot, brings the anchovies to rise to the top of the water : on these delicious fish the mackerel prey, fatten, sodas. prove, and, from them get all their richness and flavour ; but, if the summer prove cold, the anchovies keep in deep water ; they feed 011 a small transparent insect, which is poor food, mackerel pasw quently becomes nearly tasteless. BIRTH. On Friday, Lady Louisa Lasedles of a son, at her Ladyship's house in Liwer Cirosycnor.street. MARRIED, On the 11th inst. at Edinburgh. Mr. W. Kilgnur, merchant, to F. W. Morton, youngest daughter of the late 31r. John 31onn, Strand. Oa Thursday, at the Collegiate Church, Manchester, by the Rey. C. W. Ethelston, Charles Grant, Esq. of Barwood House, near Bury, to Mary Ann, only daughter of Thomas Worthington, Esq. of Manchester, and of Sharron Hall, Cheshire. At Dedham, in Essex, C. Lyfotd, Esq. of Basingstoke, 'urger, to Mary, only daughter of the late Rev. J. Eyre, of Lower Park, Dedham. IHED. On Thursday morning, the 17th inst. at Glaston, in Rutland. shire, aged 56, the lion. George Watson, uncle to the present Lorl Sondes. At Ramsey, on the 18th inst. after a long and painful illness, Thos. Sharp, Esq. banker. On the 13th inst. at Soathsea Common, Portsmouth, Mrs. To field, widow of Thomas Tofield, k:sq. of Wilsick, in the county of York. in the 84th year of her age. At Christchurch, Mr. Jos. Domain; his death was occasioned by the severe contusions he received when thrown out of his gig, a few days previous. On Thursday, the 10th inst. Mrs. Scott, landlady of the Butchers' Arms Inn, Alton, after a most painful and lingering illness of fourteen months, the last ten of which she was confined to her room. Her illness was occasioned, as she supposed, by her swal lowing a pin, which she thought stuck in her throat. Urn open. ing her, an ulcer was found between the gullet wind-pipe, whim had made a bole quite through from one into the other, cane. quently her food, instead of passing into her stomach, found ready passage into the windpipe, which brought on most irritatft coughs, and actually, though slowly, starved her, as her stomach was found quite empty, though her lungs, 6:c. were sound. She died universally regretted, aged 32 years. • - A SAVI/411 OF THIRTY PER CENT. IN HOSIERI' GLOVES, AND GENERAL OUTFITS, AT the LONDON GLOVE and STOCKING COM. PANY'S WAREHOUSE, 29, PICCADILLY. The obvious advantages arising from purchasing of the Manufacturers. is too notorious to be doubted ; along with this, the means of making selections from distressed tradesmen, have given this Com pany such advantages as cannot be fully appreciated without* trial, which the Company respectfully solicit. The following abstract of prices is submitted :- China Silk, Cotton feet, from 2s. 2d. ; stout, 3s. Gd. ; very stout, 4s. I'd. China, all Silk, 3s. 114.; stout, 4s. 9d.; very stout, 6s. 6d. Evening Dress, all Silk, Ss. 3d.; stout, fus. 6d.; itch lace, 7s. Gd. Gentlemen's stout Silk, 71. 6d. ; very stout, Bs. 6d. Cotton Stockings, sd. per pair; fine quality, Ils. 6d. pa do. zen ; stout and fine, Is. 6d. or 16s. rid. per dozen; superfine.2s. or Vs. Bd. per dozen ; extra superfine, 2s. 6d. or 28s. 6,1. Ist dozen. Gentlemen's unbleached Cotton, 9s. per (Wen ; very stou.. Is. 6d. or I7s. per dozen ; extra stout, Is. lid. or 295. per dozes Half Hose, 6a. ; tine, Ils. per dozen. Drawers, Is. 6d. ; very stout, 23. 3d. ; or pantaloon ditto, 2s. lid. Ladies' Kid Gloves, Ils. 61. per dozen ; French Kid, Is. 32. or 14s. lid. per dozen ; best Kid, Is. lid. or 17s. per dozen. Gentlemen's Woodstock Gloves, 12s. per dozen ; best, Is. SI. or 16s. W. per dozen. Doe Skin, Its. or 225. Gd. per dozen ; best Doe, 22. 641. or 211 s. dd. per dozen. Families and Gentlemen who are desirous of selecting from a extensive stock, will find this an advantageous opportunity of laying out their money profitably. SMITH. Agent to the Company, No. 29, Piccadilly, nail! opposite to St. James's Church, London. ..--•••••• GOSS'S WORKS. " llorninem pagina rostra sapit." Our page relates to man."—Mmt T Just published, price ss. in boards, Sixteenth Edition, 1. THE 2EGIS of LIFE; a Non-Medical Colutuentary on the Diseases incident to Duman Frailty. in which the Causes, Symptoms, and baneful Effects of Early Indiscretion, g .t . are fully developed. Part 11. embraces Practical Observations on Sexual Debility, its Cause, its Consequences , and its lure: With some interesting Observations on N'egetable and Animal Life.. 13 Part 111. is a Series of Cases illustrative of the preceding Sublco. explaining them in a familiar manner. By (JOSS and CO. ( 'smutting Surgeons, London. " Nature beaus " Omnibus esse TIM pro . vetit DIO " Since — Heaven to all y thaund albino supplies, " Its frugal application marks the wise." 2. 111'0 EIANA ; a Non-Medical Analysis of some tempts's% incidental to Females, in which are offered some important aisle ninon', on the peculiar debilities attending their circumstancef, sympathies. and formation. The subject of Sterility is (10 413 dwelt upon. Interesting and important cases illustrate the Id' jeer. " QUO fugit Venus ? lieu! quove color decens ?" II 11. Lib. 4. 04. j; " Whither flies Love ? Ah ! where the charming blown ?- The above may be had of Sherwood, Jones , and Co. 20, Poe' noster.mw ; C. Chapple, 59, ; S. W. Form dilly ; Callow and II awn. lb, Princes-street, comer of Gunn street, Soho; T. and G. Underwood, 32, Fleet-street and Son, 174, Fleet-street ; Onwhyn, 4, Catherine.strcet. London ; slatchett and Stevenson, Burks and Kinnebrook. with: K. Deck, 'lpswich ; Dutton, Bury St. Edmund's; pard Com-street. Bristol; Bateau and Duffield, Bath Cambridge; Todd, Briggate Deeds ; Wrightson, Birminghs' Trewman, Exeter ; Wolstenholme, York ; Gore, Liven , Hanoi ), Manchester; Jones, 117. Trongate. Glasgow ; 72, Grafton-street, Dublin ; and by 01 Booksellzrs..--(Pne. - Alums. GOSS and CO. are to be consulted, as usual. day, at their house; and Patients in the country are to describe minutely the case, enclosing a mmittancc for and medicine, which can be forwarded to any put of the vorki• GOSS and CO. M.R. C. Surgeons, No. 11, Dou verie-si Fleet -street, Lond on. HIGH WATER THIS DAY AT LONDON OUP ( Morning 21; min. after & I Afternoon 67 min. &Int: Printed at THE BRITISH PRESS Office, be 181, Strand, and Pabliahed by R. Cnarsos, bathe Pia"' • 4 .11 t.l a 1 fr r ~11 ~1~