The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-02-27 00:00:00

Seevetart et stAte, Is andertaLe the eatotGon of *l►st•project ?-..Orrtainly nil, 1 sever understood even (hit th e project was drve ieil ou. Waa yaw Lordinipcon.ulted by tile Majesty's 'Ministers U rlts the propriety of such a project as tide nue them referred t., ?—I had conversations certainty with the Secr!•tary of State upon it, but I knew !hut ipandlbe were as'cril of Sir David Dim this and the CivniPerl Officers upon it ; l never col older& it as decidh d upon. but merely n prow, .1- lion 'pude; it bud been the oriu,inil Was the opinion of your Lordrhip asked upon that project?—Not formally arkt.d as a Generdi Officer. Dues your Lordship know with whom that pro- Duet origmated du not f,ed that I !•ait with p lo priety iiilMWer that queston ; I do nut know that as • Geurral Offittr. When wa+ it first aireed that any notice should be taken of Cads.ind in the Expedition really cannot state with any precision, it arose out of the d wussions upon it ; but 1 should think rather e.irl, 1 cannot st•tte exactly, so many different I. oiret.i were arisin K every day, but I think It was pretty earl: after the Espeilition was decided on. 34 your Lorekhip recollect it was a proposal at a to time, and a proposal somewhat decided up. that Cnlsand should be entirely neglected ?- 1 rather think not alter the Expeditious was in any for.v.mlness ; I rather think Cadsand war %Limys in.oste.l aeon, particularly by the navy ; I under stood so. Did the importance of Cadsand appear greater the more it WWI coueiJeied ; and was the force, originally destined for that purpose, increased gradually till it came to the dii.irion of the army under Lord Huntley ?—I rather think the importance of it was more felt erery ,day by the navy ; greet anxiety we. expressed for a consider • able forte being employed, but it is a mistake to imp l ies.. that the whole of Lord fluntl6i's was destine I for the service of Larlastid ; there was only one brigade destit.ed for the titmice of Carl son& the other division was destined to make a di versino near the Koowle Bonny. at the same time Lord lliiiilley hut direeai n, , if necessary, to sup. port the (nee that tni.iled cos Cadssuil ; brit it was eWeeleii it would require wore than one bri ga'te at the trotia, I feisty one tegiment would have been soffii.ient. Was tour Lordship fortrishe 1 with any intaillio grace of the amount of force you might target t to find on Cailsand ?•-ii-1 think that very much appears in the intelligence before the !louse; it was son posed to be extretnely small. Was tour Lordship furnished with any Reece of the amount of force you might expect upon the Island of Walcherro ?—Noi further 61111 has been already laid before the Noose; Isola' inure precise. . Is dot date marked upon the intelligence pry- tented by your Lordship, vie. the 15th of Octube t . correctly sailed f—lt Was that the time of its being drawn up ?--It weans a great iueunre drawn up et that throe, end therefore it hears that date ; I did not think it pro. per to delteer it at that time, it we. not delivered, accurst. till the 11th of Vehroury ; I had reasons for not delivering it, but I thought it better to preserve the date at which it is iis iu fict drawn up ; there were after that nine none but verbal or criti cal alterations, I considered tits repent as finished oti that day. Is this the only narrative, or memorials or paPer *fatty descriptiow, which has been delivered to Ills Majesty by your Lordship on the subject of the Expedition ?-1 have stated that this paper was Ittepared its toy report of my proceedings in the Scheldt, arid that it was delivered to His Majesty as such on the 14th of Febtuary ; that is all I can state npon the subject of this paper, which is be fore the Home. %% sit there any other narrative, paper, memorial or memorandum of any sort, delivered to His Ma jesty upon this subject by your Lordship ?—I have already stated that this paper WAS prepared on the 13th of October; 1 aro very ready to state, if it is wished. tile reason 1 slid not deliver it then ; the reason I did not deliver it an•, that I did not think that it was right for one to stale, in fact, what wools' etnisti'ute my defence in ease army inquiry, Whe ther civil ur mil tars. that was the mason 1 did out deliver it ; 1 did deliver it as trey report of my pro ceedings, on the 14:It of February; that is all the explanation 1 can give on the subject of the paper that is before the House. Was any other paper. nernevo, memorial, or memorandum of any sort. delivered to IN Majesty upon this subject by your Lordship ?—This ;piper, which is now before the House, is my official re port of my proceedings; when lam asked with respect to any other paper, or In any other cire 00000 - stances net coming tinder that d, in-option, I do not feel myself at liberty to enter at all into any exarainatioa of that sort, and 1 must beg to tie. cline giving may answer to the question put to me. Was the narrative now before the Howse sub mitted to auy of Hie Xlejesty's Ministers, either officially or otherwise, previously to its being de livered to His Majeritc I—Not previously, it was aubraitti ii to the Calimet the day that it was deli vered to the King. Before or utter its delivery I—After. Was env communication made by your Lordship to rinv of ilk Majesty's Ministers of your intention to deliver snch a narrative previously to its being delivered '—lt was delivered after the Levee, I think I stated to several of His Milesty's Ministers, *set I meant to deliver it that day. Did your Lordship 4 , quaint several of His Mg.. r sty's Ministers at the Levee, of yoar intention to • 'eliver it previously to its being deist...v(l think I stated it merely iii . convermation. I award to di liver it myself to the King, haviug received my instructions under the sign-mannal, 1 thought it proper to present my report immediately to the King, which Wig afterwards laid before the Cabinet. Will y o ur Lordship hove the gendarme to state which of Ilia Nlajesty si Ministers were present at the Levee, and to which of them your Lordship simile the communication ?—I really cannot rocs& 1.0, I Lelirn must of the Minters were therm did not st-ste it to them in any official way. there fore it appeared very immaterial whether I stated it or not. Does your lordship rucollert that the eonclud un paragraph in the ni.irus Lions under t h e si4th iss t:.(141, runs thus : is during your Lordship's tinnance on this service, new ate to itzd, Or emit to be sent to ns, through one of our principal Se cretaries of State, constant accounts tei ni tbat passes ; and you are to follow all suds and diecetions at we shall stud you, either under our sign -manual, or through one of our priacipal Se cretaries of Stater—Certainly ; and I acted al ways in strict conformity thereto. Can your Lordship state any reasons for having deviated from the usual course under the usual instructions (as I suppose these to be) of delivering your narrative of such service through one of the principal Secretaries of State ?-I.lting . on the spot, I thought it more proper, in the situation iu which I stood, to make the report myself to Ills Majesty ; tt would have been open to rne, under that iiibtrtic ' lion, to have made it through the Secretary of state, bat I felt it wore proper to do it as I did, and that it should go to the Secretary of State afte,avards. Did your Lordship make any written communi cation by way of narrative or others ise, of what had passed under your Lordship's command in the Expedition to the Scheldt to His Majesty's princi pal Secretary of State on your return did not, I thought my dispatches were sufficient. Was any narrative or report required by any of His Majesty's Ministers of your Lordship after your return t—No. noire. Was your Lordship asked officially by His Ma jrsty's Ministers, after your return, for env account of your proceedings beyond what had Leen ow veyed in the dispatches of the Expedition under your Lordship's command sal not. Does your Lordship recollect the circumstance of an Address presented try the City of London to . His Majesty on the subject of the Expedition to the Scheldt ?—1 do perfectly ; and I believe the letter which I wrote in conseqneuce is latrine this House. Was yrntri-ordship consulted by soy of His Ma jesty'a Alftpisteurpreremasly tirthe answer given by His Majesty to that Addresa,:upon the satisfaction he had felt with both the services upon the Ex pedition, to the Scheldt ?—I should have no •dif: beaky in answering that question. I have some doubts quite as to its propriety, as that question cannot be a•lced of me as a military man. 1 had cessed to be in the commaiid ; I saw never asked officially any question upon i!. I believe, that by my letter, which is upon the table here, it will be sett, that I was no patty at all ; that I was not present at ally dkraision whatever respecting the answer to that Address. When did your Lordship apprehend your corn. mood to Cml4e, and that you Arrue not consulted us a Genera' Offiter ?—I "OS hardly consultrd us Goierral °Meer after my return. 1 c. 4.ed to lie command Or the Expedition' i■ on the 25111 of September. Was your Lordship collimated in your military capacity 011 the propriety of retaining the Island of Walehesen after your Lordship's return ?—I think not ; not olico:illy ; I WIIS INIZeII some qiiestioos connected with it, but Lau not think I yr.,' aslud any di,tinct opinion upon it. What were those questions your Lordship was asked ?—I think there were some questions, per haps, respecting how far it was defensible, with re spect In the nu tidier of men it would require to gar. Flinn it, anal .owe general questions upon the pro. lvitility of an inundation, different circninst.stees of that sort ; but I rtu not think 1 was called upon miitsrily to state any . distinct opinion upon the subject ; A is alluded to iu borne of nay dispatches. I think. Did your Lordship, in fact, state, either asked or unasked, any opinion upon the propriety of re taining the island of Witlelicren ?-1 was not called upon to make ant• report upon that subject. which is the only way in which 1 can possibly consider 1 could give an answer to the question. Your Lordship did not, of ynur own accord s de liver any opinion upon that point as a military span —No, f did not. Your Lordship has stated, that your reasons for not delivering your narrative to the King earlier than the 14th of February were, that you chose to reserve your defence till the time when any military or other Mquiry might take place ; will your Lord ship state your rea3un for delivering it on the pre. Mee day of' the 14th of February ?-••••I had no par ticular reason for doing it ou that precise day, ex cept that it happened to be a Levee-day ; why I wished to do it about that time was, that I conceived there was no objection, at that time, to my so do ing; and besides that I felt a dc.are„ that, as I had not been called upon at that time to be examined here, and that the Admiral had, my account of the proceedings in the Scheldt might, in some way or other, come before the public, and I knew that could not be dour but by my delivering it to the Ibis I here think it necessary to state, in addl. tom, that one of the reasons why I wished fora cer ium time to delay delivering this report, was, that I was in expectation that some ACCOSIIII of his proceedings would have teen delivered in by Sir Richard kitrachan; I had indeed understood that lie had lean ed upon for something of that sort ; I know that, with a view to it, lie had asked for par ticular reports and details of sclera' of the officers under him. I conceived he would be called upon to snake some narrative of his liroceedings, end I was very aos.ians that they should both come Up preciewly at the mine time, that I should not our narrative tirst before any statement was given ru by him. From whom dill your I.ord,l.ip undervtimd, that Sir Richard Strachan had been called ripon for a• narrative of his proceedings ?-1 did not know it from any gro'd authority, far probably the thing would have takers place if I had. I allude to that it loch was very generally understood. I knew fl o ut all the officers under Sir Richard Streator' had been caked upon for minute reports of their proceedings. I suppose I wus mistaken, or prolwibly a report n,uhl have appeared. if it was called for from him hut I understooi it frou rumour, sad 1 thauglit it probable. Wag it merrly from COIIII7IOO rumour, end lint from any Obcial person, you had this report ?—I do not think it was trom any official iwrtnn. Or any tine who had berm an official per,on ?-1 think nut. . Or cooaerted •itb kay official prrson ?—No, I think not. Did your Lordship lwlitve at the time ynsi `.i wired to that naryrLive to the King. that Sir It. 2c),Jo IrJ dtliv..ed io a natr.tive of arty sail? —I did not ; I suppose: ceataioly Out. Did 3 our Lordahip take any steps to comtottni cote In Sir Richard Strachati that yoit intended to deliver iti such it oat naive t—Cert stilly inn ; I had no coiganutticution with Sir It. Str.cioto trout the tinte I left the Scheldt. After the delivery of that Narrative, dill you Lordship take any nitpstocommunicateittoSit It. St, Si. lima ma cer tainly tit/r, 'liar 1{110414 I hare fit myself (it I had been M ein...llo is) rrril justified wit I it.. not On what possi ble ground I could have comnounirat eel au unlit oil report *nada to the King. I believe it was inured for the rely day after it was delivered to the King; therefore bar It. Stiachau would Lust it iu Clint 'ray. Before your Lordship sailed upon the Expedition, load your Lordship any consultation with one sir more, or the whole of the General Officers emptily ell whirr you is the Espeditiou to the Scheldt?-1 had a greet deal of eommusii. cation almost daily with most of them that wime within my reach ; I had au rosamnnieution with the char of throe to. nether; they never were in the !MOW place of the range lime. Did your Lordship kauw that there weir milder your com mand Officers who had been at Antwerp in the (vane of or-t -wice ?—Yea, 1 did. Did your Lordship consult with those Officers individually or collectively os the subject of the Eliedition ?—1 had tonversaitme with than, or cousolted with thrill ; no the subject of tim Expedition; there were, I believe, wee or two Officr is who bad bees there. Will your Lordship hare the goodness to name who abuse Officers were ?--Sir William Laskine bad bee.. Ihcer, I saw him at Deal, and bad some COOrrrIMIOU With him 0,1 the ruhject of the enterprise ; and I believe General Gi use ea..- had been there,lie bad been, Intone, inn t tie 'Fete de liamire, and I rather thick he was in Antwerp. Did your Lordship ask or rere ire nay opinion from the Geueral Officers Witter your COMUJAIIII, MI the IMMUltillty Or improbahility of the amens of the enterprise.?—la is eery difficult to answer that question ; it it as lemur In ask wise. titer I culled upon any Grurril other, to give Mr a report of his opinion ou the pruhabiluty or improbability of the !Mart. prize,. I certainly did out. I hail a Deal deal of ritisat na tion a ith dilieent Onierro, bat their opinions must limes. eerily vary from timc'tto time, acemeletig to intelligent* mad ether circumstance. Dom your Lordship recollect a particular conversation with Sir John Hope, at Deal or Ramsgate, ire the inkjet t of the probability of success or failure .--I think I hail a good dent of eonversatiarri with Sir John Hope at Deal, or the general operations to he pursued; but I du not think that bar lutto Hope stated to tar all distint I opintou taste way or the other, as to the probable success or failure of the enter prise. Did your lordship deliver to His Majesty nay other nar rative memorial, paper, or tnensoriendino, relative to the Email/lion to the Scheldt, besides the um.: *bah is mow upon the table of the House of Commons ?--I bare said that I deli. vexed, on the isth of rrlortaitry, to His Majesty, say official Report of any proreedings m the Scheldt, 1 must he tinder the necessity ul persisting inlay determinist post of declining to mower soy further question upou that •Mrject. As Coutinander.in- Chief of the Expeditiou to the Scheldt, did your Lordship deliver to His Majesty, any other paper, narrative or mannorouitreen respecting the operations of that Expedition, besides the nu:afire now ton the table of the House of Cueaurau ?-.11 can give sat other answer, thew that 1 hare already ; I have stated, that I delivi•reil Stay , repeat, as Commander of the Expedition, to the Kiley, us ter calk of February. Glum what grounds does your Lordship 'erase to naswer the question just pioposed ?--1 decline moments' the ques tion* ; I bare stated all I did in my nitlitliary capacity, !hick is, that I delivered my official report to the King, us thr lath of February; taut the cuutents tat that repute I atm rtatlY to Fire any iatiwination. 1 understood your Loselship to say, that your military ea. taaekr ended on the astk al Septeiniter, tiro your bordstiip faudaj at Deal ?.-No, nut lily military capacity ; that which fettled as to my military capacity es Comusander of the forces cuaseig, was with reference to questions as to the dm fence of Watellicren ; I do nut apprehend that nay military capacity ceased, bat !conceive that I continued 'lastly amen able to way Court of 'equity or any Court-Martial. Does pose Lordship Weise to answer the question just proposed on dissnons4 of your being a Pr:vy Counsellor ? —7 refuse it I.llllBrally. I decline aura rein the question. Did not the capture or destruction of the enemy's fleet faun one of the material objects of the Expedition to the Scheldt ?—lt certmaly did. It was so described in the in. steactions Did your Lordship know, prior to your sailing from Eng land, that the frees Is deet could put itself smiler the pro. tertion of Ilse Indierire at Antwerp had nu very petvise isformatim communicated to me upon that sitiMeeth it was rather a naval question. In the event that your Lordship should find, se loular ar. rival, the fleet had so put itself in protect' under the cita. del of Antwerp, mid that your Lordship should find the citadel And the town of Antwerp in a state of defence, had your Lordship in this country formed say determination as to what were le be your Lordship's operations under those circumstances 3 -1 have before said that an precise plan of operations ems fixed upon before I left this country; it must have depended entiiely spim circenistances, sad the intelli gence when we a:rived. In the event of your Lordship's lading the enemy in pls. session of no stun ready to take tin held alpinist your Lord alup's artily, but in a state of defence in Antwerp, bad your Lordslup tbrined wy detcnninatiou as to y one operation, w►ether you would, is order to destroy the Beet, as one of the peat objects, twiner Antwerp ?—I had feigned no d.• tersnientosa belie, I wcut ; as I said, that must depend upon circumstances at the tine. Tilt,' 'MI( Lordship had formed no plan of operation, prior to your sailing from this courant ?—:rio detailed plan of operations. Did your Lordship, on your arrival in the Scheldt, Ind the state art Antwerp and the preparations of the enemy in the field and the fortresses, such as was represented to your I.orilship to be the state of the enemy prior to your Lord ship's saihnyt from this country gradually obtained in formatiori as Men MI I could of the stole of the enemy% force, and the stale of Antwerp, I did not hod auy such in formation on my arrival iu the Scheldt. Did your Lordship lad that the state of the enemy's fur. tresses at Antwerp and on the Scheldt, and the ninny's force as Antwerp, and to the neighbourhood ail' Antwerp, on`yeor Lordship's arrival, to eorrespond with that represented tube the rime of those• fortresses, and of that hirre, prior to your sailing Crum Liigland ?-1 ►ad so amain of knowing the state of Antwerp; rim my antral in the Scheldt, t obtained gni. dually informatiors on the subject. Prior to your Lordship's railing from England, had your Lordship any intelligesicc as to the *late of Autwerp, sag the strength of the corm) us Antwerp mod its neighbourhood I bad nu mine prei no• information upon that subject than what is contained 110 the 11111 hornet. that is before the Nouse. Doi your Lordship Snit that intelligeoce correct Iww4 du not knew how to answer cleat questioisesactly, or how !could eret ascertain whether it was cooed 1 kat siseant to be asked whether it was correct at the tone it wee gives.? Whether the state I n which your Lordship found dm ear my and his fur 00000 es on your orris's, in the Srhtldt , cur. responded wit► that represented to your Lordship lobe the state of the enemy prior to your Lordship leaving this caten ary did out bud ou toy arrival any information on tLis subject, I acquired iiihirocitiou gradually of the strength of Antweip and the enemy's force DM sorb information as your Lordship (rodu.klly acquired after your arnval there, correspond with the idlisteation picrimwly rmetsed here •—I think not entire') as to t:te state of Aolecrp. . . _ Dol it materially darer as to the state of Aul acrp litre that the intellezeisce, no for as it rent, not immedials• ly on myarrival, lost ni ■ sulnwqnent lime, went to state that the works of Antwerp hail heels pot ale a stein a repair. Dom your Lordship hw beve that the works of Antwrrp, psi ticularly the citailcl Id Austiorp, were mot put into a silo of repair sold after the arrival of your Lordship to (Inc Schrhlt should fancy heftwe that time, but 1 csaaot ■peak correctly. Had your Lordship any intrllmenee before you sidled from !kis cuuNiri, tint Ito peso of the citadel of Antwerp comnisoded what ;tie callrd thr smells!' at Antwerp betere 1 bays alriia.ly alumtattl lb 41 cocattota.aa fat s 1 ass gha t 4 bj to .lo it Uld IL certain • I I,;foz, year Puec. Did your Lued.:Lip expert when yott slited i n fi nd 4 „ . weep in a had state iit defence, troth a. to us Sad its listriwou ?—A great deal of the intetilizaer •eitt to that effect. DA your l‘ordaliip Usw ruy prirtte of ronfij,.ntig.. its uct ion* to the Gement l/G i ecls under tbut romans,' cauutit 'perk poutieely. but I at.prclu let the jostrarb„.., at Waal ninny of thew, to the “metal Otht.ern, opobin, table uf the MANI. - )our lAiritakip fureislard with heavy art:lirly s a k,a k to the siege eJ Antwerp, in thr event .4 us bt.og uremia undertake a singe, Md.:petition a . of that u se d 1, the , su s , Flushiux t-1 cannot names. Hat guar:sou, w.thuut loos ul mailer wild' circumstances it is a taut. %Va. your Lordship furnished, prior to your ar.Vs): this tumidly, with heavy olds:ince, in the etc,o necessary to andertake the viege Antwerp htia ordnance sitifywisi to usdertalir that siege, inikiie;idrut of the ordnance for the siege of Flushing, snideji.i,i t, „we your Lordship to carry us the twu sieges at uure i f sary —I ant afraid I assaut perfectly aaswe i 11.. 1 without knowing what circumstances nre riippowa ter 14 whether, under the circumstance id Antra . 11 k iiit in a perfect state of defence, and with a sufficieut garriso Or under any tidier sapptisition. Under the supposition tither ut Antwerp being suffiriexii, rirrisimod, and In • inaivt.: 10.41.) of defence, mid Ilin would be necessary to undertake w regular 5e)7.., furnished with heavy lino tai s sufficient to the town, in the event of &I li , pubardimarut beiag reknit,' bt —that i• n professional question which I donut Lan haw to arnaver, aides, it is accurately stated; I de ail penes, ly take I ias yursto.u. Was s oar Li f iMdp furnished with a sufficient, of heat artillery to enable you to carry on the two *per/Isms, lb . . one against Antwerp and the oilier against Flashing, a l ry a .ante time ?—I had a sulli::ieucy of heavy artillery Is pre for , tat/0640111C strength uf Ikm army. I certainly bail not 4.14(Ni iry of at ;nor was It in runletirililliells. for the ,°, fly town and cita:fel of Ants erp, , upposing it tu iu repair sag garrisoned, ani li a siege could never hate Isr3 contemplation witlistlie army I conssauded. I wish to that there tens a sufficiency of orillianci• In aut (N, 1.0, bitty burdineut ; but in the event of a ii:ege, the litaiy sta.'s for the Expedition ag.uitat Anita., was to he famished by the navy. (His I.o.nishop was dirt Ord to stillaJnor fThe Ciaairm %lAA ecird to trjoaa t roves., and tali kart to .at nasal j THE BRITISH PRESS. 1 ,ON DON, TUESDAY, Far, 97. . --raw • 4,. Captain RICHAILDstiN, of . !hip !lector, v. rived at Liverpool, ou raid freer Tarn,,,, which place Ole left on the t. , ita of January. 1 . :.e c Apt i ni niro t ions that the Spaoiarda had gaited a lune; victory ever the Fieuch army in Catthsata, and that it wee eurre:itly frpo..tell and behev.i. that thu had set pwsseaahni of 'Luc loisa,ut the dun: he left Spain. Five transports mimed at Coil: on Monetit weet, rom Lisbon. • • They formed part of a let which ralel. friun tliot port, under the protection at 11s Itlaav:str's ship Semiramis. Capt. Casacvs. The Semiramis, aith the other part of tke lint, pot, into CrJokhaveu.—When the Ceuroy left Li.- bun. the British troops had marched fioin tha city to j"in Lord WoLualorox's army in the North of Portugal. We give, 'his day, it length, the evidtoct of Lord CIUTiIAVI upon the IVetcheree itayalry. An Inquest was held, yesterdsy, upnn the hotly of the Hun. Mr. Eine, and the verdict wit.," f•niwl dead in the River Thinnest, at Itia past 12 o'clock, on Sunday nioruing, the 25:11 of Febru:::y, 1810, but how, or by what meaus, un evidence threes( has coat 'before the Jury."—Mr. V I it Is lam's, has lost uo time to disho,e of the Tellets:ss of the Exchequer, held b) the thice4sed. It its been given to Mr. Y . OIIIIIE. A sew writ was secant. ingly moved, last night, in the House of Commas. C..r Cambridgeshire, to return ■ Member iu tie room of that Hight Hon. tientlernoo. We have received a letter from Ni.utia;naf• datrd the 10th of hat tuoath, from o hick tar iai• lowiug is au extract : " 11AST111/QUI, JAL 10. Brigodier-Gen. Illaacoui - vr - conne (rem St. Croix to be employed in the Eapedirion ageing' Guadeloupe. Every thing is prepared, and se vs only waiting for orders. ERsolur is said to be th ttrisaned upon • sharp resistance, but I thigh it will be but short. Our army is amazing'y sell Ir pointed. We carry with us two tiue black up metro. in two or three days we shall probably Oa Monday se'irnight, ■ geoerat meeting of the Catholics of Wexford war held "at the Court-Boom for the purpose of taking into consideratio n t i ts oppression, under which they labour, end adopting measure% for their entire removal. A number af appropriate sod spirited resolutions were entered into. It gives us extreme satisfaction to tied hat the people are not insensible to the parr one aid indefatigable exertions of their eouritryinni, ED. WARD Hay. To this Gentleman the inhatetsele of Wexford hare returned thanks, for the sea which he discovers in sdrocating the move of • much-injured country. History will record. 11:4 posterity will admi r e , t he w uncommon effort, ithists this worthy and highly-reppeetalele patriot . Em ploying. to mile Irishmen to that rank which Oa talents and their eirtue•deeerv-. A new Farce, iatitltd, w h is or /live," ear re dated at the Lyceum Theatre, last slight. It le the production of Mr. POCOCK. the anthor of tt Arta." produced. Of the monomer. at t 11• Theatre. It is one of the beat fames of modcrir.dint• and promises a long and Inicremfol career. t 4: fe, bustle, and lionrour, it awarded *mutant awn. - merit to a roost brilliant Awl crowded aiidtrito• Mauro:. initiiiTnni, PENlfif. KNIGHT. DIC 9)II. ' Iv% had ruts adidirably adapted to their and displaying a rich Mild of genuine burrow hull the pert of Cipher, by Mr. Marritcws, stood P"' eminent in the galaxy of `tare. Cypher is a r Atm ney, and Member of Four-in-bend Club, 4,1 lie foibles nod re centricities of which, err bit off with exquisite sk 11. A smog in character, d est:nide,' old* Jr-archers whom he meets in o abort drive fot,s! town, was given rvi Ii the heppiesertfee and mcoreff with &Ilion issin. We regret that she presserl ! of mare weighty matter obliges us to defer • Ni mecca:et of trim' mast tnterraing pitCy• LON Doi4 :—Pntoor.l ts) C. Algal!, Ifiss t, Ciseerei • 41 • ,1 ptblabed .t the Othe r . N. Dark of Fl nemrMl CLarrlis pt. and. by J. Wier., of .as. plate &r. far is Paps:. *eel le lbe (p•gt - r ani), 9 ' l L. duly &limit's/ M. p~MRh NEW TOO 00.110 H will b. ■. Lonl Trifikr 'NE tTr ?Aka . rentirr An 1/304 V, A 11 11 Char:l.:ll n 01.%, Hu l Un , Lrery , N vER THE at th 4 1111EIR I the ra CATIt E, prefiwp A TI , Lonl roPP'" C t.earli; You I. Amanda, loydem, aler vines rhe Ortrture r TM Charnel ;:ISLKAnci r The he+ Fa mbenuArd app farther 11.14 ire. O Friday, 11 a the 111 m. • An milady I ker loss so pr ___ Third Mil A ' , Ric . Pfl VCSaI parbrolari, it. • Tahcs Deo • compkie pi late of the I Jotor of tb, Siedural and Loudon: Pi nos and Co. I Sbetwood, Ki Where way be DR . n" sal:kris smAt danger"' seld I to be p. valtati,m of tl kw whets NI , IMERICAN MB, tt imm prevents keen Parents irlsr I . irap, o» rrl in did and in the Dolton hush cares of their children TY b. Lad u ore street, 0 1111, London ; 66p...urinal 94. a Little, f DR . "eC air, out Otto • reit, ode& templeiet‘ to mato in of o Amok re 44 . I etteholoot bt Lad to 16..1 10114.11; Ind 111.1 tug bops Win en th remit the - - • isk ti Dr James's I R. haft's emr, it 411. Nam are Neeiery. N i _ • 1. gears' voh apArtom Ilit.llll lowa i fault trsprrt alct egll4 nt .1 tierl 0p1 , 11.14 'II I atankmd. Iku f nneera sa.lkaa APYIY 1* Ism, AI.PM. IS 'mil t 114 s, I thi.gek rs IM DR VII v 1 SU ion 1 " - .1' a evii rtu 6: GMs tle le , , %Furen• 11 %ell amid. tw. K ~~~. uPrf P.M. a an t , nf a tlaa 4 hwts,aakd Pne .4 sn ,Arb. COM! mth P-k - 74.; " / 1 •4 rt. I,