The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-08-10 00:00:00

*molly hnil hi, kr, wing supported by Port Con. ception, and iris hue extended along the rugged moutitato which looks towards Almeida. On ob. serving oar reconnoitring, party, hti drew out eleven bitial•ons, eight %Atli& "no. and lICVeli ntcea of C1111V111• The the peasants make the enemy's army to ix • ithdrawini beyond the frou.. • tiers of Partiigid ; that the Eir;lishi left the defence of Almeida to the Purtaguest; and that Lord ‘Vel -IMgtosi had placed the Spaniards on his flanks and at his Trout. Perces have been sent to reconnoitre the English army. The third company of gr enadiers of the 2.2,1 iieynlars , w l, l 1 , was Me-It to support one of these parties, was surrounded 1111 leaving a village. by n p. • y of son Eitgliah nose. Captiin Gouache immediately formed his company into a square, re ceived three successive charges from all the ca- • valry, and killed 24 torn and 20 horses belonging to the enemy. wno then left him without any of his greoadiria ha% tag oven been wenndrd. The salwrs 1.1 - the eurotty mere all • dell off by the bayonets or niuskets. Captdie Gouache and Serjennt Pettis wet e particalativ distinguished in this action by their presence of mind and bravery.--(Monitear.) Outbid Rodrigo' is putting iii a state of defence, and preparation , ate matting for speedily undertak. ing the siege of Alts : itla. asTl. 4 othtsi—BlSCAY. The English 1.4,1 rinbaikea 1111 board one of their light squadrons two or three thousand robbers from the Astuious and Galotcin, for the purpose of anaknig landing* on the coast ofßiseay in concert w'th some detachments of their troops. They were successively put on shore at Santona Hari Bernie°, where the vigilance and activity of the French Cuompandert did toot give them time to act. They nevertheless sncceeded in destroying two or three small batteries, cud in carrying ofd' some tishinit-boats. To such a feat was coo filled that expedition from which the greatest i.e .-tilts were expected ! They fuund every point b 0 well guarded, that they could not even /WWI 011 shore, aims, ammunition, and clothing,. which had been demanded by several Chiefs of bands. They expected that their appearance on this coast would bare occasioned 1111 111F1IIIMMI011, but they were once more mistaken; their landings did not pro erne. the smallest degree .of sensation: on the con trary, the inhabitants of Biscay observed wioh con t• mot the employment of such wretched means ; this was also a new proof fur them of the absolute impotency of the insurgents and their allies to un dertake any thing serious agaiust the points which are occupied by our troops. A3ILRICA. SPEECH OF THE' HON. JOHN RANDOLPH. othave ow Tile NuoUCTlost OF Till NATAL. EsTA DLISHMLNT OT THE UNITED sTATEN. APRIL 25, 1810. The Committee of the whole having reported the Bill for the Reduction of the Naval Establishment, with various amendments, going to defeat the main Object of the Bill ; land the question having been put on the first amendment.-- Mr. RANDoIPh said, that as his objections to the navy went to the whole system, he would make his obeervations et large, in preference to reserving then, in detached parts on the various details of the object (said Mr. It ) is to endeavour to persuade the floats* that they ought not to con mar in the report of the Committee of the whole Mimes.. I have ever believed that the people of the United States were destined to become at some period or others great naval power. The unerring indications of that fact were presented to us in tonnage end number of seamen exereiling•thow of may Other nation in the world, only ouc excepted. When theiefore I proposivil to reduce the naval establishment of the United States, it was not for the pitiful object of putting down some five or merit gun-boats, and two or three luimportant navy yards, Of of anaking the mighty reduction content plaited in the amendment of the giutletnan from Pennsylvania. lo other words, it was not for the purpose of making barely sucn • tetrenehmasit the naval expenditure as might enable government, after such retretichment web effected, to go on with tie aid of loans and taxer. We laud two views of the probable state of the nation presented to us during this session. The first was a view of war, in which case it was agreed on all hands that loans and taxes would be necessary. The nest wee a view of peace, in which case it was believed that loans and taxes were unnecessary, and were so pronounced from the highest authority in the country on titian. ciel concerns. But now it steins we have a view of reducing military and naval expeoalit tire, which does not obviate the necessity of loans sod taxes. My object in the proposed reduction was, not to enable the governineut to get on with the aid of loans and taxes, bait to make such reduction as would have viable(' the government to dispense with a recur reface to them. have raid, Sir, that the United States were. in any opri , oli, distilled to become a great naval pow er, anal I have read unerring indications of at in the commercial prosperity of on r country, out of which alone it can grow. But I !where if any thing could retard, or eventually destroy at—if any thing could strangle in the cradle the infant Hercules of the American navy, it would be the very injudi cious mode in which that power bag been attempted to lie prematurely brought into action, and kept in action during the two list administrations. a wawal power ueemsarity grows nut of tonnage and a-amen. We have not only driven away our ton . nage, but have exerted ourselves with no little arul, even a: 6:14 eery session, to prevent its ever coming bacls. We have tint been walling to mi asma, that vessels pantile(' by the u opera...made si n •f a breach of the Embargo, should return. True it is, that we have not made the some provisiou in relation ro steoir-ta : we have coneoveil the guilt rather to reside in the wood er iron, than in the men who cotittar:•erl it. But although we have no provision fur toe espresat parprese that they should not retool, unfortutatt.ly they hive not returnel. maul the priof of this fact is eti•.....41 i,y aro olare, viz thationisinon are at this moment employed oil lowir4l ..air few slii-.4 Or , war. because seamen cannot i.e Procured. (tar touti.ge said seamen them the 0.40 : * * na"ti pfterr, are wounded by our oven soresitres to • emend. rattle degree. Adein. at :184 ideals beet, enderstood, according to soy view of the subject, - that etale of the principal naes a a navy was to protect commerce; but our political rule for some time past has heel' that of inverse pro portion, and se have discoiered that commerce is the natural protector of a navy. The proof of this to found, if not in every set ot this House, certainly in roost of the speeches delivered on this tloor. I need only allude to a speech made by a colleague of mine, (Mr. tlholson) who usually sits on my right hand, a few days ago; in which be stated, that the power to regulate commerce was specially given by the ionstitsition to the United States, nut as u means of raising ft:senile, cqu•tltsiig duties throughout the Utoted States, and making us all in Let one fund); hut that it was put into the hoods of Congress, as a 'scorpion a hip to bring the ether nations of, the world to our It ruu,, that by turning away the light or our cotimenasice, the minshiut of our commercial bounty; they 'night with►r and decoy. I hail tistimght too, Sr. that the revenue Wllith H arrival establislimeut iisturiely cast's for, was to be founded on cominerciel greatness : iu other words, that commerce was to give iti revenue. re venue woe to support a navy, which, in turn, was to protect commerce.. Bat it seems we have changed all One:, we have perverted the whole course of procedure ; and why, Sir, shall we keep up en expensive naval estabrishiuent, necessarily driving us into loans and taxes, for the protection of a commerce which the Government itself says we shall not carry on; and when Members of this House tell us, that the natural protection of com merce is the annihilation of it? The navy has now become a sort of fifth wheel to the political coach, and I am unwilling to keep it up at this expense on these grounds. If, Sir, the construction which I have taken of the sense of the House and of the Govt. 11111 l ent be not correct, whence comes it that siA have such cases before us as Daniel Buck ? Whetter conies it that we hear of Treasury instructions, nut issued in the first instance for the purpose of expounding a law touching the clearances of vessels. that uni formity may prevail in the different districts; but supplementary instruction-, becoming in practice the actual law of the land ? lo other words, if my construction be nut correct, whence comes it that every principle formerly called federal, every prin ciple of executive energy soil power, has been strained of late to an extent heretofore unparal leled? Whence comes it that in the archives of this assembly we find copies of li&!ences given by the Executive Power lA' the nation—to do *hut? To permit one part of this confederacy to supply another part with bread! We have hail executive licences, graciously petmitting that a •',llion of our citexens should not starve, whilst thr rest were revelling in plenty, and suffering Tor want of a market ! Let us suppose that in the fragmr tits of history of the ancient nations of the earth, of those periods which ore most involved in obscurity, we should find on imperial regerapt to this et i et—what would be the inevitable conclwton of the historian ? That if the chief magietrate could at pleasure starve one part of the people whilst another w a s rioting in plenty, that the individual who held this power was the greatest despot on earth, and the govern ment a pure awl unmixed despotism. But, Siri it would be improper to draw any such concluson here, because we are the (DOA ellbghtelll:d people on earth-1 believe we have placed that on record ! It was nothing hut the protection of the navy of the United States. a desire of avcriging the attack on the Chesapeake—for moos% all the cuusrs of the Embargo, we hear of none oftener than un.attrick on the Chesapeake—it was Coaling hut a defence, not only of the commercial interests. but of the naval strength of the nation, which created this dictatorship in the person of the First %gip trate. It was not that we are naturally more prime to slavery than others—but it was fur the preserva tion of our *national deleuce (if that he not 1101‘1. betty opposed to national defeace. which core.. four millious, and which, when Greek meets Greek and the tug of war comes, must take refuge under ouch measures as those I have mentioned).--No, Sir, niy object in the lhll winch I *sewed to the House was a great flue. It *ma to 'little us to dis pense with a loan to the acknowledged amount of 5.160,000 dollars—'o enable us to dispense with teem ttttt to all amount which uo mum can calculate —if, indeed, the system which passed this House was constructed to tamp, in revenue at all. It was not a little paltry straw of reducing ■ lou pit. of navy yards—not to bury the dead who have been already interred in the marshes of the — net twice to slay the slain—it was for a great public object. Really, Sir, the redaction of the gentleman from Feiniaylvatiiii (Mr. Sunlit) reminds our ter' forcibly of au incident which is said to hive takes place at the discovery of the Gnupnw•cler I'lot. When ronuni•stonrrs were sent into the pat liainent riitlts to examine into the situation of the giros powder slid combustibles collected together for the purpose of blowing up the king. the parliament, and the whole con/dile:Mu, they returned 4101 re wined th it they lid found fifty barrels of guile poweles, that they hail removed five-and-twenty barrels, and hisnihly trusted that the remaining tire' awl-twenty would do no harm!—This is precisely the reduction which the Committer and the gen denten from Pennsylvania have agreed to snake; it is a reduction win h will not do any eflisctual service, and I therefore hope the House will not ac cord in it. - . . But we are told that great and gigantic events in Euri7pe are to Ire arrested—that which the British 'my ninon, do, l suppose. or that which the corn• blued continental forces opposed to lier cannot ef fect. is to be derided here by three frigates; for that is precisely theestelit to which, if 1 understand hint, he is wilting to go! It seems we are also to suffer a total Ims of the ships to be sold. they be ing unfit fur every other purprue. Ate they unlit for the East Indian trade? Ws* not the first vessel that ever doubled the Cape of Good Hope unJer the deg of the United Shoes, the old frigate 41. hews a And would n.it these vessels, if sold. he purchased for that and for other purposes, snore especially whin we consider the immense loss 40f t44nitaae which the United States have tois.stined (I sill lint .sy how, but when) within the last two yes II • 1 1nt elm, if well founded, would be no oh.. jectioti with rhe to the reduction of the navy. Ima ottt-or, to put s clause io the 8.11 to authorize the Pr•odent to glee the frigates 4060 y, if he minim le II th.. 11• My of jectton to the earner is not inertly to prunds, and pence—hot to the; couuting-housecakidations—lintoo espetisce Stay incommensurate to the otjet t it to witch Wow expenses profess to to, and to a.,,wystint of ‘ datolO nizeil public plunder. If we agree to mak-Mini, reduction, however. according I. the atatememt.asf the gentleman from N'iNinia (NI:. Bassett). fo reigners will purchase from us ships of the best con struction in the world, on the hest terms. I be- 7 here, if the gentleman's knowledge ou th- state of our public skips was as accurate, as perhaps it is on , the other • subject., he would hardly suspect fo reigners of coming to our markets, for the purpose of buyiug those ships to ttttt oy our eisinnieree. Who will become the purchasers ? Great. Britain? Af ter having given her hundreds of thousands of tour of your shipping, now suiliog under the British thn, , ,, and manned her navy with your seamen driven from your employment, do you believe the Admi ralty will send across the Atlantic to buy the hu fee rottiug at the navy yard ? Or would it be a for midable itccession to the British navy, especially when four of these weasels are absolutely omit for •ny purpose whatever ? I. presitine that even the Emperor of France, if it were on object with hint to have these fatuous models of naval ardiitecture at Antwerp, would hardly venture to purchase them, and run the, risk of getting them across the ocean. 1 conceive you could baldly get insurance done on theist at Philadelphia or Baltimore. The idea of getting these vessels is ob.::doh-1y idle, unless Gentlemen are rhymed to scud their cuoniueree on the ocean, and employ force in the protection of it. Sir, I do know that comparisons are extremely unpleasant, and uo consider:4lam would induce me to go into them, especially niter the observation of my friend lvefore me (Alr. Macon), but the dis charge of a❑ iuipetious public duty. 1 can have tin hopes of deriving any thing further thus. rape rietice front the past aittoiniussitiume—it is to make use of this experience that 1 erta the attention of the Howe to the comparative expenses of the navy under the several actrutaiistrutioni. ',ll .' I find, from the tie isury statement in my hand, made on the sth of this month, that the navy tinder General Washington's adiniiiistrat Mu cost deveu hundred thousand dollars; that during the four years of Mr. A•latita's adinini,tration it cost nine imhltous seven hundred thousand dollars •in round numbers; that in the eight years of the succeeding administration it cost twelve WitlliOUS seven hun dred thousand dollars. I make these remarks, be cause the statement differs front That made by the . worthy Gentlemen from Connecticut, in this re. spect ; that when lie made the rapt itiliture under the last administration to amount to fourteen mil lions, he did in my opinion improperly saddle that ailmintstration twit the expenditure of the year 1661. viz. 2,111.12, - .. dollars, atithmised mid voted under Mr. Ailaiiis's administration. From the mere glance at this paler it will be seen, that fro* . 1601-1, the rtilienniture fell (min' the above sum of two milhons to mite hundred thousand dol lars, making distinctly the retrenchment at the period of Mr. Jefferson's accesitioa. The first year properly chargeable to the last administrati tttt is that succeediog the one in which they came into office, viz. 1803. 1 find also, from a comparison of the statements in the same document, that the most extravagant year of the second administration was the year 1800, the year after I first had the ho nour of a seat in this when the expennithre amounted to 3.448,776 dollars. The most extra vagant year of the last administration was the year, succeeding its g0t0,.,.- out of office. the eapcni..-a o f which were incurred and voted by' it, viz. to the amount of 5,427,756 dollars. Against the administration of 'Mr. Adams, I, in common with many others, did, and do yet, cuter tent a sentiment of hostility, and have repeatedly cried out against it for extravagapce inul for pro fusion, aud for wa-te, wanton waste of the public reseturces. I find, intwel er, upon consideration, whether from the nature of man, or float the na ture of things, or front whatever other cause, that that administration, giossly extrevegaiat as I aid then Rini st:11 do believe to have been, if tried by the criterion of the succeeding one, was a pattern if retrenchment and economy ; ami I a.k the House to put the tilts shut to themeelves, whether we are likely to see, at any future period, sit ucni. nistration more economical than that of which we have just now taken leave? And this I say, without meriting to cast the slightest imputation on the present. The person How at the head of :anis has, at least in one respect, conducted himself in his high office in a spirit dear to my heart ; it is the spirit of a getitlemen. The first vi ssion of Con gress tinder the last edministration was a period of l retrenchment. Throw the session of last summer out of the qoestion, and this must be the session of reform tinder the present. Have we soy reason, to conclude from what we have seen or heated, that we can look forward to any policy more economical than that of the administration of which we have just taken leave? 1 wish to he clearly understood, thin in tRi- year 1800, in 'thick our expenses utimunterl to :1,448,110t1 dollars, we had three 44- gtlu frigates, slX.lrigatee from 44 to 32, two of of a large size, lour of 32, smatter, eight from 32 to 10, three ',lmperil war, rod four brigs from 18 to Ift, and five brigs and schooners, from 14 to 12 guns, employing a total of '1,i06 seamen. This adiumistriation, too, it should be rrinaiked, hot mily built every Olean-, every vess e l of force (rat, Sir, built them from the stump), which the United States now have, but many others which have been since sold, and the proceeds of winch have gone into the Treasury. At this time,• them when the limited Staten had this formidable force anoet, when steady 8,000 seamen were em ployed ; (I know the dot:annum only state 7,300, Litt I min told, from the bust authority, there were nearly 8,0004) when Mir flag at least triumphed in our own semi ; when we had nothinguf that aye tetra of drawing within our shell, wh•cli the gentle. man from Connecticut so justly derides; when we had not readied the soft-shelled state in which we are pieced by the Non-intercoutte law---at that time the navy of the United S rtes cost neatly three minions and ma ha. snaking for each seamen shout 472 dollars. I kunst.. Sir, that these statements are dry, but they .r.• ustful in proportion as Wry ate dry. dig curttrog to the statement which my colei Ivaeue kla..et , ) has untie, aiul which he bits 1,141 you net only caste fiats. the Secretors. of th e e Navy, loot assa , i the SeesEutry's owe. liateit:wrllling, the outu'ot r us se ,rueir mahu.h we had la .t year, jo ,;pii:ley wet e1,V13, which relit the ns.t;no 4 40 ,000 dolhar:; for each mnn emplcytel tir.ttm i • init. nf OO itollars! Now, Sir, it every seaman ulqi,rti, teat ailininietration cots elont•le the expeiew th it h - u rtui iswitrred fur the same Malt under the prei-1. tug one, if the Nettie vpiviltitil• C 0114411114 a. ow I. t rut) reason to doubt that the station mat year Kit coat dminie.of their preterit exuvitlir. Lot evtri suppose-44e eatwilee to reuiaM the cline a, it hut 6, will the representatives or the A t• ngwe to maintain a mita% force which costa as hisudreir 1 . .16in 13j dolhon per in•ii, a„,. of which i, amiss has attempted to tine s , much It, to desiortlistrate ? I wish to he indulged in a little farther.comptc,i, five political ilitaiotny. I I,elieve, Sir, tlii.t th e same good results in polvics from comparing th e Invite ,of different mit 66 66 istrations. that re•ults in niediettie and surgery from the atialsectioti of the b um " bialy—that they are fairly to he tried by th e same rules. 1 find. then, that in this year tbiti, the estimated pay el the adlitArs is 391,ttu0 duhery and that the estimated pay of the eentaarts, itt the tonne year, is 818,000 dollars; and yet,'S;r, the slum:the amw before tut-, mad which yrs t,, n , tlrmaa 1:441 turn to, 11144 e fur the y cur ir.lu9, th e sitimi.trilc., of the officers, their pay, and that 14 the se.imen, atnonaits only to 9.96,tin0 dollari, g sum less Ly nearly an hundred tlimisin i ti than the estimattd pay alone of the oflieers is inon ; whilst the wqrelows of the whole estah! - ,51,. tnent approach, for the last year, sithin oat mil. lion of dollars of the exp.nase of the year first tars. boned. lam at a lose to account for these feat i i i c o,isisteticies, and I might say 'solecisms i n our political orithinetic. We have a miry which we are told employe 2,700 roen, which costs withl4 a third as much es a navy employing nearly tt,Onn men; and yet, when we come to ecnspare the great objects of expenses, to wit, pay and oubsi.:ence cl the odiceis 'and' seamen, the reward of valour sod merit, we find a contrast, which I larlieve so ma iu this house is prepared to explain tnr in:: the b i aw w : , et: S ;tr et i u r ieta. shc;, l c ' e c t r :::vi t ; l e ": i :ti e v itafi l od e ol proportion la s imsr u alr b yptt j ui te to4thgclie t ot ( naso t sx h il a t,l o isir :k boards ene G flav o! fea t mii., : rtt j htai is m marine corr.. I have •Iwelys underlitood that sm• soil. tit owls a number of guns. I fit.d , that lade year 160 u, commission, mantled 'with 'wally 0,000 m.n. to expense of the marine curl's unwonted to 1ti2.000 dollars; and in 1809, when we have ten or (diet. vessels Or ell sorts. maimed with 2,300 Otilltlita. lite expense of the marine corps summits to ethale dollars : and yet, Sir. if we ktuk at the iteuv, thee does not seem to lie a very great sal lauce bog es snow of the most importain : for instance, I fig that the clothiiti• ni-lboo was estimated at 33,01 dollars; in 1309 ' at bat 33.000—and yet the moot, •es limn cloth:11g costs 1,000 (loam's leas, cost, to the aggregate, 50.4100 dollars more. Then come the navy yards. Of these; that of %Vastiimron alone hus..cost nearly one-half of the slim expeoiled on them all. Well might my col. Ireguie say' it was worth as much as the %hole, when it lint eo-t as roach--when, indeed, we hare wit. nessed a cmsiderahte town, and the most 'loutish. ing town too in this wide region, called the city of Washington. built out of the public treasury. Yes, Sir, we have economised until we &bolster hive reduced the anneal cost of a 'sestina eta 471 dollars, all it was under the very wasteful expes. &tura of Mr. Adams's adminiatration, down istlie moderate snip of 837 dollars! We have tom nosed until a paltry fleet, consisting of vessels Wit to our hand (to say tiothiog . of those that hove has sold, and the warlike stores of which have been R. tainted and preserved), which fleet was built, equip, and evert/ cannon mad ithplement of war purchased under the old administration, has cost us toele millions of dollars, when it cost the preceding E. atitustration but nine! Is this no argument fir reduction? The Gintleman from Connecticut (Mr. Dana) tells you he dues not wish an anothi!atia, hot a reform of the naval establishment. Sir, at long as a single chip remains in tha t navy.yard, yos will never see any thing like reform--es long n you have a chip of public property. one chip of live oak belonging to the United States, you will have a mutt riding in his canine with a long ietinse of deputies and clerks, to take care of it. And, Sir, if the Gentleman from Connecticut does net mean utterly to disgust the pelile of the United States against a navy ; if, in truth, he is a (needle a navy, le ought to Join and put down this oar yard ; and net, with my friend from North Coto lime (Mr. 4 .llacon), keep it up, in hors the WO rutty of the evil will it some time or other coned itself ! Among the many 'reasons offered to this Ilea for retaining the ruinous parts of ibis estaldistuest no one iiaid a word in favour of the marine coal' that went sub sileraiu—but a great deal was s sitlit fasour of Washington. We were told that our flea might be Copenbagened. *nil that it ass thereke to cesanry to stow it ewer here. We also heard 4 the great press or work o, the large towns—of ds mercantile employ which there canoe into compel' Lion with that of the United States. 1 believe, Sot that our wen kinen, and men of all descriptions. ital the highest to the lowest—i speak of s ulandinstia —have long ago found the truth of the old praerrtio. that the King's chaff is better than other fame corn. But it seems, that in order to get a comae dity cheap, we are not logo whirs it is to be hid—. oh Ito! there is competition!—bat w e must hood workmen here in the mail - conc h, b y which come?, once, I understand, not only live stock for the i.ar)' yard, but copper bolts. and such light articles2 lo i sometimes brought-1 replica". to get oat of t virsy of competitiou—comrtition in the markt t Philadelphia mud Baltimore, where they are boss at private Sae. 111 this way have seamem inS _ I instance,.• been conveyed ; and esiores oninW every material of ship's timber and naval stores l o la been repestedly brought from Norfolk thisl ne p n l . at an immense cost, worked up here i tit 0 1; 'rifest from Baltimore, Philadelphia. Sc''. _ or :: flint. so worked up, it might go back to :‘ L there to remain ! But, Sir, if nitr object rode to preiesit our fleet from bring Copetinsge;. 1)61.1 better lint it above the falls of Niagara. : B'Sioistil iserinestiowiLly Le moat secur e; IT ' Ace}ri fi rt o Y r o lo l.4 B l:l l 4 ! " ti li t het f series r"s'lle i of l telluhlearrmib:ukte:sisP7Tu7nlidla'rh'; :'' ad•P I moY., ki , c inui 0 p utter nav Oar WO r AC "I' !tt re, v W TI 01,11 rePtitie rt, oat :Aecas 0 . t y.01 1 0)1 ht. ow: 6e V" ha fa ~ pc~t~C i Ii Ly ril.4.rg I), Wit 1,1 oul4P ou I I . rijiri Brit, S' ~.eti Or 06AU, 0 hirir r oe num pod cred o d.ling grade! p;,41 t< ✓ do ruiti ti • olvdttiti :lit NI 3USW 1 u . m 1 .. I. it $ll - 1 a CV: [tr INA 'itilill I •re reti P:r 3 ray !Sat tie 1 Uwe army lof •tt is, !hat e. not g al.;* ra ine,t.i to lint Of CI a :Atte is arts treo [ of a 9 the ivis.t lua et At ma Bat eht the anoi4 bite dm, °alarm of aerial I n liyikg, unit n I tiottise oft d6p, FAN_ i RUM., ral 12:ies iets - t, " nt, e.,„ or tsa ii