The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-11-09 00:00:00

LAW iNTELLIGENct. . . liefendant; why he should pot thew by what right he Claimed to be a member or the Common Coun cil of f averford-Ws4 t—The election sr the De fends and several others. took place under the follow g circumstances :—Tbs Ilsyor, to be cor !met a the poll, applied to a traumas (is Mr. Jones) for his assistance oil the occcasion. A Gentleman put a question to the Defendant, whether he had coerr O F KIN G's DENCIIv Nor. I. 10 014 1117ADATT, SAILT• AGALNST IFIAWCIA ooge t COLE.SI-IN. ISQ• ALIJA/AT AT AMMO ow 1 0 0, WASS OF 1.-01ADI 0 NI. INIT4AINAL rose, Sad $lll4O IM 1111. - _ ~ The Al"llL to the Court to - pot o ff the Trial received the sacrament dune that year ?He re td tstG,h a pp l y action until after the a rguments fused to *mver , on which the same Gentleman de clared that the Wen:lent. or the other Caisehelates, Lrthesr is the c upo a°9 o v . c a e D n e ac m t u io r n re w r. broughthi fi c i h ed lie b litu. thCPlain !ile'"" nsined ' ia li Ch 1 Abbott S could not be elected without declaring whe t the Right on. ar es 7 peaker ther they had er had wit received the Sawa .'" f Commons, for the following rear House o . smut previous to the election. He slim stated, brought a au t the Ser'ea t5 ,...1 9 Vie idle" It ” J • lit that he had in his possession a case which was cuu kali, the Declaration states, that Defendant firmed in the Court of King's Bench, to that effect; 'wiener, and broken open the the t o nal force sod . . le Motor and Mr. Jones repeatedly called on him f Nod, and imprisoned Imo is, the Tower to let them see the case, which he refused ; and nee contrary to la To this Declaration loo t a, cou ,w. . s Mr. Jones not betog aware of surh a one being in tewilet p ; ra ded, that I houtiff was a Member of exietence, 'Advised the Mayor to adjourn the poll to u sa se o f Cotnniona; that he hail, in his place, t h e miewiut; day. Between the adjournment and ,skit H ov er, avowed himself as the author of a the meeong next day, the Defeisdaut sod some P ublished is, Co&bare Weekly I:Tiger ; other caulk!Sacrament privately des received the • y d id letter was voted by th at W i p e a areas, at Lily K-usington's house. This was what the m o ue, sod wicked libel ou titet House ; sad Learned Seryeant's clients complained of. He :t h e ssiti House came to n resolutio n he aid ' . that the (Mr. A itorney.Geueral) held in hie baud the affida- F urc iA sh ould he committed so the Tower of'ens of the atiyor and Mr. -1 of ..0.1e11, whin 110947.7ee1Y ~ for t h e same; that the Speaker issued his deeded that they adjourned the poll with the lutes,. Fe a t for that purpose, and gave it to the Defeo- tinu of giving the Defendant an opportunity A t to mote; that he, the said Defendant, in of receiving the Sacraineut ; but that they did it ee t he t a, and in virtue of his office as t o give en emte l vta an oppor t uni ty o f b iewg et Amu aforesaid, did anent the said Sir made acquili.ited with the case ItleiltlUlltd by the . sad did impris ou the said Sir F. in the said Gentlem tit, and which he refused to skew theni. %err of Loudon.—.T 0 t hi s plea Sir F. replied, Mr. Jones, dining the evening, searc . ,ed for it. st.ii be, the said Defendant, did use more violence funnel . o.—lt was The King v. Ilawkinr, and did wll l iecestary or fitting for the sage.—Ulan not bear on the case ; and so lit &tiered at the m l o am, and those pleading*, issue had been ineetregeni the folherio„,a day, alien the poll ails re ad in that action, and it wee fixed to be tried opene•il, and the Defendant elected. But suppose, t he2uth day of this mouth.—. There was 0.0 said the Learned Counsel, the Defentinit had hot t hrtaetion brought by thesame Plaintiff again st rece.vetl the Sacrament during adjourtinient, hie eight 800. Charles Abbott, Speaker of the election wcill I reimiitv g 001, for tile Act of fn .of Contemns. and the pleadiugs in both demnity (the ,imh if the King) sets forth. that any . tern in matter and form pretty nearly alike. perste; elects. I. and who received the S , cratu..tit ,ny ee emss a difference in the conduct of the I before the year 1911, should he competent to fill 'add is tins action, for instead oe joining ianve I suc h sou:gm:is to which they had bee', so chosen. via, esti petting himself upoti his country, and Lord ENV.; istinovait—o 1 iliti.k there i- some. bus hy lento; the case go to a Jury. he thought thing intricate in this case, and t h it might to 'to cuter sicl file a iiiontirter. The eonwrittestre come belore th. Court in the fullest 111367ileir ; I c a lls the: he himself puts the question of Imo thriefore think the rule ought to be- in •ile ahmlute, 6. 0 . ro aseesteiii, therefore, the quest on of which wilt minlile us to have .t argued at length." to vote the subject. was not only a (loanable Buie made absolute. •sr, bet iti instice was that which should precede THE JUNG V. Roil it. motel the feet; god, therefore, to scold uoi- Mr. Arrows ey-Gewismat --e This is a similer tesoaryroiede both to the Court and the parties, case to the last, except that the Defendant did ilees•td it aster end better fur pu'.lic ailsantage, receive tit. , ti..i rainent before the firs' day of elec. mach more likely to serve the ends of public I hum which (Mee away with the complaint, slid of potter, eat their Lordships should first decide course the rule mintiveritschargril with costs. i. 4 give tohpnent on the Demurrer. and theit Mr. Serjeatis lat 44 4cknovilr4tH th it the elate sty, and ant till Corti. open the matter of fact. meta of Air. Artvriey-Denritil was true, bur the fie hoped and trusted that no person would Defendant had deceived the 4.'timpluitiants by re.. Aine that he was desirous for d&ay. Oa the fusing to amiss er whether he had mar hid not receir oerae, lie had used every possible owe soil lib. ad the Sitersiti• lit pee, tam the first, to have those matters breaglit I Lord ELhessogoccu—" I cannot hold, brother u s Needy ccaelession. The Court shonld tau- Le" toot a remit late at an election has a right to littertul that the P:aintiff did not tile his declare. answer even question put to him by his electors, or lisesel the igth of May. Ou :list 16th of the a party oppner,• to l• ." Stleliios7ll* he (the Atterues.Geoeval) fikii. his Itule dutittuwed with costs - fie; notaithstaudiog that by tile practice of the THE at ash, it. atcil. Cwt, it was entitled, by their usual uolul k ience, Mr. GLithres; moved toe 4 Rule to ~hewc ause fried% fortheetime. He did oot„ hiswever. avail i why the 'erase( in MI indictment should not he loud( of any stick indulgence or right, but I Set aside. or a hew trial granted. It WWI feted be firadulterthrith. What, em the other hand, was I fore Mr. Justice Le Blene at the lest Assizes iit foe conduct of the other side ? Notwithatandine Oxford, and a verdict given for the Crowe. It tt'e curly PIXY?' at which the turd pies were filed, t was en toidtctsuent against two belies, of the name the Pianaiffdtwo sot tile his Demurrer till the 17th of It-di, fur nut repairing • bridge in Berita. He of June, it seeks after he had filed his dee' ins- would not contend that, as the owners of the manor, fife: nor has he even yet thought fit to join issue they were not etbltio-d to repafr ; tint he weld, upon bus own Demurrer. that they were net liable to rebuild. lii the per. The opalinea upon the Demurrer may yet take seat rat, the bridge was blown flows. by the visi 414ce, tithe Defeudant pleases. on Tuesday mitt. mho:, s.f Gust, which could bet have bens rarest , n hen the Friday then following. If the Plaint Wile rwe prevented by human in ons. It had beets de. -fore willing to join in Demurrer. so as to gwe teriniiied its costa of embankment on the sea-cuesi s It:opportunity ief having t h e souse argued on either • wh e re hiesehes had been made by storm. the tie" days, he (the Attararj.tkurrsl) would county was liable. early edireatage of the present motion, and go Lord Ei.l.ltaaoltetloll—.." Can you point nut trial on the day already Axed. He then moved where a county is islet: to tile visitatioo of God, Para Role, 'calling upon Sir Francis Burdett to sad individuals not'" en cause shy the trial at bar, is, the action which I Mr. GLEADa— , . Certainly not, my Lord." 11000 against Fraucie George Cabrnet,. Eq. Mr. Justice La BLAsc--" It may be very severe 'lnch stands fixed fee the Ooth for. imam'', egotist the Lashes but certainly the case is very not be pat off until the Court should give j strong agamst the,o." 4 , 11 t upon the Demurrer filed in the act by I Rule ref used. • leought against the Hon. Charles Abbot." Toe Crime inquired whether notices of tool had 1 FW!4I in the t wo * mi ens upon which Mime hie! FULL v. HaRNIISS. it pond ?—The Attorisey.General auowered This ac tion was inetoght by tee Plaintiff, an At at were had not. t"r"ey of this Coact, fur a debt of 61. 1 I r . 11,1 . Ina TS!. Arrrotecy-GettERAL then added, that th curred by toe Defetolsiii, who holds a sttuatton in te Plamtiff had lame lit awn her action w.,rtihs e t the Trami t vort Office; in cotiargariwe of Plainti f f ~, I: oof Moira, a, Co a netable of the TOWrr. for having inorled ceptato law-procredinga 111 his be. `rely detaining him in custody there; to winch , i , i wi , actiwil b'l f %chats e Before A Defendant hail also pleaded in form null h a lf ---- - on a I o e g . . . the tertninstinit of the law-peneeeilings, however, ' , malice Dearly the ' • ps Sericant at Arms 11-CI , the present Defendant had compromised with the .': varyiug Inis plea with the allegatome, toot „,,, who were Plainti ffs tuatiat action, and pro ell'd ol Lis capacity of Constable as aforesaid, e l —* " . i f were of course stopped; and he now is trintino• II anti bound to receive and detain psi- fu fr se d d lu e . p Cie costs incurred by the step , . token 4 1 :' 1, 11, ell•d•oly A 'nitwit ted in him. 'flit saint ma- . the c i a•is t ie ! br Mr. Hill. The bull its tpsestom 'frier... prevailed in this act i on to have the " • ' * c ~. . that had beet) drawn by a Mr. ',memo, who is no.. de. • sin elf that existed i the J. ,,,. ,. n c other , namely, ceased. and accepted by the Defendant. In con , 1 'nom tol• law shook, have the precedency of of • • had l I:‘.nt a writ .1(4.11 it. .• T"ltr of fact. But there vise also in this ac- ""Ptel,,;ve its """*Purlie of 'a h. h and n oire of t o is hi additional reasim : Air. V . Lord " led Il ' - 'nut him, a copy • c' evidence " of ovi n e, s iii •16.°Y" declaration. it appeared from the . , • tenor. hail but recently heard that Mr t•aiem sus - • ' George Hil:, the brother of the Plaintiff, a nd w ho, d who is a most material wituess tor his at the time of the transaction, wee ren• ydo ed as Ins eel, was absent, and with the army • P 11 4 all h t,,, ere ht is now ferrying with advantage 1 1 111 • '"' country and he , himself. with t , weevil to (Wend the *coot,. Mr. George .. ''''it of 11.44i,,t.civiitIreollir as wae,ince w il i in t l i s t: , et a s totally ignorant of the person who broti4l.t them ; but. he supposed at the l'' ''''l Coital! 1 battle f. • ' at the rezent of Burnt. . rent by direetion of Mr. Harness. He had application had been mode at the tV•r-Of were d .. never seen Mr. Hiram* at his brother's office ; he 147 SOUS li• lie knew of I I Pat ; hut the, . , - had called uts h i m tw i ce at the Trenspert .oei re ; tele 1 , nig return to this military could ion once in October IVO. w P hes he resented live bid dit P see in time fur the trial, and he Is 1 ffi hail l a - of costs, at which time Mr. flames,. stated that he as to that effect. / tillt thi s -11 these Kutlithlsit he moved would call ou Mr. Hill on the following cloy ; and 1 Et trial .1.. should he put oll• . agent, when be served hint with the copy of a writ Nis ,, _ .....t.exemtfleGa.—" Take three Rates oil the 'lld of January lost. sh Z . R .,.. ° o 7 , tinct Rule is, each ectirm ; and let copies Robert Carvell, who woe also • clerk in Plain thecf._ pi n ,- grin as hitherto had, be delivered to tiff's office at the time the copy of the writ was left e t , 1. ,7,7 n time. The Coast will find it moo there. depoasel that lie had sever seen Mr. Ilartie.ss if ihe " u ‘ ). P , o , ' process of each action to be ill pol.lClltiall at his master'. office, but lie had taken •bII of Th e Ayr costs to Defendant at the Transport O ff ice. at an 'ilia i i, l 1,, , ° III eXT-GltWithat. answered , —that "re c ,adier pcsiod to the busium than that mentioned b eer e...,,• takes, to eupply their Lordsittips on:. 10. last settee-1h at a hich time Mr. Heroes.* said, T ~vutiate document. that lie would call mid settle with the Plainti ff .— ° lee Nlisi were all granted. Ile had hero with Mr. 11 entree very lately, midi.: Ile s li Tat ItIVG e. Patti try. the following circumstacees:—lle understood that trOaaa • T-Geli veer, shrived mist twine ;Mr. I lid intended to fahiscena him (the witness) on I Rde a h te i In d by No be'jeant Less, *gains. the t.• present ::i....!, and in courequence be called COURT OF C031310N PLEAS, Wasvaings, Nov. • . . upon him. Mr. Hill then intOntted him, that iii thought he would have erittestri fishnet wittiest! his amistaneo. .Witnws fry offaucled at thin treat! _ welds rind; as be had hid some trouble, he 'via determined, if pomilile, to he Hid fur it p he there fore went to Mr. Mane's (the - Defendant) aud haw ing tutted that he believed he was the only Perscu who could prove Platiattra ceer, inquired •• whe ther he (Mr. Harness) would give Ws any thing in ease he did not come *forward with his evidence?" This, however, Mr. Harness hail declined. Mr. Serjraut Bart. in addrevaing the Jury, stated, that it was out enough for the Minna to prove that the Witness had been done—uii, he ought to rhea that it was executed by the 'special direction of the Defendant. which, hr contended, hod not been mode out. Neither or the witurenee could tell who kit the copy of tits writ at Ilic Philo- gitrs office. When Mr. de . o. Hill eiilled on the. De fendant with thr bill costs. hr did not al he would pay the Plaintiff ; he mint? 'Awed that he woad call on him. With respect to the .serosid witness. who had sworn that Mr. Harness VIA he sum, lib had dentillany bows lodge of an agreetbsnt to give them to Mr. Wiiistanley ; cud rebtstil to de liver them to two peracni but Ur. Plitmaii.t. lie Deicr before heaid 'hot the Defendant had *eosin fur more than I. He had brought an action for the goods ag oust Sir. William Maaiters! biit, PPS he found that the pOt•SCAMOII of thetas bud. gone from him. the business had been compromised. on Sir William's paying lel: for the humor the furaia tore. He had never before heard of the agreement mentioned by the last wiines., that if ten pounds were out paid at a certain nine the goods should become the property of the Defendant. A rule of Court, that had been drawn up by tho Defendant's Attorney; in a former weans which been brought agittuitt him relative to these ay. tides of furniture, but had not been procesded its which he notified his intention of defending the scuba on the ground of having retinae(' possession of the goo.to RN a security r., fire *minds due to him, was here vat in, and ad.oitted in evidence. would pay Mr. 1101, after what he had stated of himself, ne did toot think be ICIs worthy of credit. Th. , Jury surely would not trust that witness, who, hatvitig quarrelled with his late employer, insane. diately went to the other party for ►he put pose of rot:riving . • comeronottion for suppressing los era- A perann hf the nime of linivineen &paned ► that he tlinnaht tiir y t o ds wrre aorth the pits annexed to them in the list, Litton 1.,11. deuce. - He could call no wiNiew.e .. * in the Cas,— atrurta was. of cow... itteuitwetent ; and dlr. Gormiio h ad crawl to torsi. fir Agaiti tepernted. Cod Mr. George Hill had proved nothing against bin chew.; and uo credit could be given to the other *line's. Lord ewer Jttstice Nlonsetet.o—su The notice of J,claratims writieh has been put in, must have be it serve.l at tai • urferai pit's house, anti, if pro. pray dewit.er,l, 2 au,t liov, berg given to the De- irotiaat Limerlf. Hurt then dill it get into the howl. of Mr. 14.11? There certainly is no proof that Manes , ever via. at the iiii ff's bowie. ur that he hod any acquaintance with hint--hut it ap pears strange. as the copy of writ and notice of de clarittioa mug have beep in possession of Defend stit. on who a they were served. how they could be taken from his custody, without him knowledge. and placed In that of the Plaintiff. The Willie.. (101 l tied deposed, that Defendant said he would call on Pt iantiff.' You must consular whether that declaration is sufficient to prove that Heroes* kuew I'lcotiff was defending an action for him. It be was ignorant of the circistal.tanee. why did he not ricoreaa some surprise ut being presouted with a hill. aleim the menses of which he knew uothisig?— Ir full credit were given to the testimony of Car vell, there would be an rod of the action—as hr had sworn that Mr. Harness had confew.ed his ha tinny—h.* conduct, however, in calling ou Mr. I M00r... for the purnosr of re. tiring a flow* ur to keep ba-k his evidence, renders lout opals to coo -1 soletable an-pidon. 1 nook the nonce of &clona llion must have been screed on the Ifefentlein. and wont got out of his hoods vtith his komeledge; and I why, I wonl-1 ask. should it be thus carried to IPlatiddra off,..e, without there was an l U ie li ijoa O f geeing:: loin to defend the comae?" Verdict for the Plaintill---.6.usges 61. I ls. 10d. Mr. S.-6,410 Heir —..l.lterendatit is an ideal. aud will seek my ewissesif ity-a saa pf rums." FEICSON 0. CALLOW. Th . ft+ Wag en Net ion for the prier of two pigs sold to the Defendant by Plettall. The cause woo not led. C a ll. na , it appeared. had entrre.l into on az,retittent with the Plaintiff on the :lath of Nl.iy last, to purchase fnur pigs, for which he was to pay Itit. sod which were to be taken from tirt's premises on the following dny. At the .pe. coded time, Defendaht sent for two of the pigs, but refused to take the other two, which were still pOSSell$101), really to he delivered up...- Vet:het lur Plaintiff--damages SI. Mr. Sergeant Brse, fur the Dcfeartlant, address. eil the Jury A Ith great eintliseiree. He ileprecated the practice of Attornert coming forward to give evidence in cases where they were thenseeltes wipe ployed, and in which, of course, they meet feit a considerable hide. A great I air Authority am of thy same opinion ; and he treat.. I, as ha now had it in his power. beine i Peer of the Keehn. that he would bring • 1341 into liarlirarairat, for the outwore of preventing inch proettedd r... i..." lie contended, that the Joey hid no right to pritia • witness's evidence; they • onild id her receive sr reject it altogether. if this ..ritoriple were foileered in the present cam, there must b • 4 verdict for bit client; for if they believed all Bruee's ellci-are, it went clearly to prove. that. by the Plaintiff's failing to pay a stipulated ewe ea a cerise"' day to the Defendant, his right in •the- thip4t.. eel property had cravei before the 'ellen was tireoght. if, en the other hind, they di •believed. it, then Mr. Pitcher's evidence went for nothing; for, in en action of this deserintlin, it was nee- If ti thmt the disputed articles ahnold be speeift-doweich Broce had done, but Mr. Pitch* , ',Le totally issi competent to do; and, therefore, if 'h..y '44%4 Bruce's evidence. that weer surf r t era betel proved. • ventiti for his ch. et met fall .sir„ I.nrrl Chief Justice Mistime," swot wed litho evidence with great orciiracy....:ie was of ermine that the Jury had a right to cm credit either Its the whole or part of any evidence which ewer be. fore them, as to them should seem proper. A mit. ne-s might, in some instances, speak incoereetlye and, in *them, his deposi•ion might be tattles* ( I Verdict with troth. Verdict for the Pt oistiff. &stages 11"1. wheat ,to the tletlitetinit of the-Si. die onginetly by Ptak* I tato Defendant. •-... , . . • - LiflF INTEiLkiNd. .- . • Tiefendent. why be should pot thew by what right upon hip. Mr. Hill then jorr;rnslid him, that he I sum, he had tit:14'1)811y knowledge of an agrecintnt —.--....--- . he Claimed to be a member of the Common Coon. thought he would have snidest% eisbugh without 'to give them to Mr. Witotenley ; and termite; tir de- OW Of KING'S DENCIIe Nor. I. ell of averford- West [—The election ef the De- his amistiteem ,‘Vitssior felt °Peeled at this treat • liter them to ewe peremi taut Mr. Pliteseit.t. lie ... ---. fends and several others. took plait under the meat, end i as he had hardhard some trouble, he was - :osier Infere heard that the. Defendeo be le t d *vist . 1. BeaI:ATT, SART. Atial.Nier FOAMS :—T pietav follow g circumstances bil Mrflur, to be core determined, if poesilile, to be Hid fur it ;he there.. Fur more than 61. He had brought an *alma for .1, taws cotestam. 'SQ. VELISANT AT anti or recta the poll. applied to • Barrister (it Mr. Jones) fore went to Mr. Harness (the Defendant) aud hem the goods lig oust Sir. William hie:mots: bill, WS . • ..., s . , cot; os volittanha. A ..; for his assistance on the occcssion . A Gentleman ing stated that lie bettered he was the only Perms he found that the pastICAMOII sof them bud. gone . 14 - e - ; ooa gew-GalltiltAL rose, and saideriet Ent a question to the Defendant , whether he had who could prove Platiairs case, iutinired r• whe- from him, the Ittesinem had !nee compromised. on it t i i : id to a pply to the Court to pot o ff the vial received the sacrament duriuo that year? Hr re- Hier he (Mr. Hanlon) would give him any thing in Sir William's paying left for the tumor tlw loran d e above action until after the arguments fused to emptier, on which the swat Gentleman de- time he did not come 'forward with his evideuce )" t a re • He had never before heard of the agreement Ihr la th Demurrer, filed by the Plain- t , . ._ Is m up on a . elated that the ' Defendant. or the other Catodidete . s, This, however , Mr. Harness hail declined. • mentioned . by the last wishes., that if ten pounds 1 ' a edin an action which he hew brought could not be elected without declaring wise- Mr. Serjeaut Bast, in addrewitig the Jury, I were nut pied at a certain lime the goods should liw t f rhnelig'ld Hon. Charles Abbott, Speaker thee they had or had not received the Sawa- stated, that it was not enough for the Plentilf to • become the property of the Defendant. " House of Commons , for the following sea- Relent previous to the election. He also stated, prove that the business lied been dose—alit lie ! A rule of Celia, that had been drawn up by the „ t he .....4,, t i :e action brought against th e Serjeant that he had in his possession a case which was cuu- ought to chew that it wee executed by the 'simnel Defendent's Attorney; in a former action which the Declaration state", that Defeudent firmed iu the Court of King's Bench, to that effect; direction of the Defendant. which, he contended, leiel been brought against hies relative to them am V i n s i ; farce and violence, and broken open the the Nlator and Mr. Jones repeatedly called on h•m had not been made out. Neither of the wain-saes tides of funtitnre, but heal not been proceeded in, o f Pleiutiff, and I mprisoned him iii the Tower to let them see the case, which he ristesed ; end could tell who l e f t t h e co py o f ti nt writ at the Plait,- lin which he notified his intention of defending the con trary to law. To this Declaration. Mr. Jones nut hee l a w are of smelt a one being in titre ogice. When Mr. Geo. Hill celled on the De. action on the grouted of having retained possession 1444 tet :' n ' p ; ea ded, that Plaiutiff was a Member of existence, Asked the Mayor to adjourn the pod to fendent with the bill of costs. lie did not say he lof the goods RN a security fir due outintls due to Hew o r commons: that he had, in his place, the following day. Hetweeu the adjourisment and inlaid pay the Pleititiff ;he merely Ataled that he him, was here vitt iii, mid ad p itted in evidence. e wit Hover, avowed . himself as the author of' a the fleeing next day, the Defeisdatit mod some sorteld ca ll on hint. With respect to the iircond A person id' the name of Hoteingdon &posted, .i e , published iii Co&liat'i Weekly Begistcr; other caulid des received the Sacrament privately witness, who hart sworn that Mr. Ilarneei nisi he that he tliotielit the gods were worth the price a id l a tter was rated by that el•ise a gross, at Lidy K-eisington's house. This was what the would pan Mr. Hill, after what lie hail stated of . e annexed to them in the list, abort IJI. .., : A c es, and sicked libel on that House ; mid Learned Serjeiteit'r clients complained of. He himself, ne did tint think he w a s worth y of credit. Mr. Sergeent Byte, for the Dcfeittlant, add r t oossid House came cos resolution that the said (Mr. A itortiey-Gelieral) held in boo baud the Aide- The Jury surely would not trust that witness, who, hl the Jar ry with great eimpseitee. He de Ara yrec t„,hould be committed to 'the Tower of vita of the Nti t iit and o f Mr. Josses, W/111 isoltiseiy hitensg quarrelled with his late..eutp lo y er, ii i": the practice of' Attorneys corning forward to giro 1, Intl f or the mune ; that the Speaker issued his deeded that they adjourned the poll with the nitrite diatel4 went to the other party f or the put pose of evidence in ea where they were the lee. acne 4. orro , f o r that purpose , end gate it to the Defeo- tinu of giving the Defendant an opportunity mei ng a compensation for suppressing Ins ere. ployed. and in which, of course, they mast feiks - ,it to „ Kl e e ; that he, the said Defendant, in of receivine the Sacrament; but that they did it deuce. He could call no witiiewees in the case— coesiderable bide. A great las Authority was wooer teereuf, and in virtue of his office as to give themselves en opportunity of being I Mr. Harness was, of comer, iticuineetent ; and Mr. of the same opining ; and he treet...l, as ha . • ots t Arun aforesaid, did arrest the mid Sir ma d e acre-wiled with the case llleittluntd by the Gorman had cresol to vest . ll.- again repeated , now had it in op inion power. better a Peer of the . and did imprisou the said Sir F. in the fe t id G en tlein t i e, and which he refused to thew them. - Cod Mr. George Hill had proved nothing ',cellist Keehn. that he would brine a Bill into Parharaidat, ••thisplea Sir re 1•I ever of Lourlon.—.To for the purpose of preventing such proceed er...... teethe said Defendant, did use more violence found if.--It was The King v. newt:ins, end did ' other witness. He (midyear& that the Jury esd no right to gerlshe •. at , oee ntary or fitting for the lonse.— Upon not bear on the case ; and so lit declared at the Lord Creel Jostles Meserter.o—or The notice • witness's evidence; they • 'mild vi• her iris se ~ : „o ra tion, and those pleading+. issue had been meetregen the foliewitig day, when the poll ass ► re- of declaration which hoe beets put in, must have reject it altionther. If this ..ritiemle were followed din that action, cod it was fixed to be tried opened, and the Defensfain elecierl. But suppose, be n served at th • Defend-tilt', house, anti. if pro- t e v reoh day of this mouth.—. There was also said the Learned Counsel s the Defenreitit had sett ii the th st b• 4 verdict for bit prineist case, ere 0111 perly det,Vreell, roust liar, bees given to the De- client; far it t h ey b e t teee 4 a 8,,,,,,e, ces .te rwer , e er avion brought by 'hemline Plaiiittff eget, st rece.vrol the Sacrament durin i i adjournment. his readout himself. How then did it get into the i t wen, clearly to ... am , rho. by t h e pi e m itt et e Isi• eight Boa. Charles Abbott. Speaker of the election %trio' t remliti g eel, for tile eilcl of la. hands of Mr. Hill? There certainly is no proof ( - who . to ...., a r efl .... loyd In : a au a certain . ao of Commons. and the pleadings i n leish d ow ner,. (rhe.iorts hi the King) sets forth, that any • that !Wimp ever was at the II • ff 's home. or day t `n the rpreyentianr, his right nt ' twee divot . , eat were in matter and form pretty nearly alike. perm., elect.- I. suet who tecrivril the S.cratuesit that lie had any acgiesiutance with hits--hut it sp. ed property had creel be f ore the "ellen was ~, at t e m .., a difference in the conduct of the I before the y•ver 1811, should he conmetent to fill pears strange, as the copy of writ and notice of tie- firooght. If, on tlx other hind, they di -believed. rt - • d oe is tali action. for anneal of joining issue I such attuatious to which they had been so chosen. . cleretioa inuet have beep in possession of Defend• it, then Mr. Pitcher's evidence went foe nothiegt e . i s , e a petting hiinwir olio. his country. end Lord E Lute avant:an- 0 1 think there i- some. aut. on who n they were served. how they could be for, in an scrimp of this desettintatt. it was nec atm. tetc hy low:Vitt case go to a Jury. he thought thing intricate to t hi s case, end Ow it ought to taken from his custody, without his knowledge, ...,Host the disimted articles ithould be speeifi-di writeit •t e ea tersel file a D"osurrer. The nionnliiritce come helore ill, Court in the fullest 1113611iier 1 I and placed in that of the Plaintiff. Ttie witue-s n ßrute had done, but Mr. Pitch* , w-• • totally him h ere to. do: he himself pots the question of t aro ti,riefore think the rule ought to be in .de ahmlute, Dill tied deposed, t h at Defendant said th e would -n cotnpetent to do; and, therefore, if they "riveted i h ei. re nierrtviii, therefore, the timeline of • which " ill enable us to have it argued at length." . colt on PI iantiff.' You must conisider whether that ' • spin the subject. was not only a desirable M u l e tun l e ulisieute. I tleciarettoes is suScieut to prove that Heroes. knew Bruce's evidence , that sew mere re t not being i proved, a reedits for his ch. nt mu .t full .w. e ...e, bight intent was that which shined precede THE JUNO e. 8041141. lrls“.ll 6. was defending an action for him. If he Lord Chief Justice Mansion., seal wed epthis t -strudel the fact; sod, therefore, to avoid on- Mr. ATTouts Ey-GewiretAe—e This is a similar was ienoraiit of the circistatdmee, why del he not evidence with great wrcerere....llle was of opinion emery !row& both to the Court and the parties, ease to the lent, except that the Defemlnut did - teterese male teirprise at being preseuted wish a that the Jury had a right to give credo either to it e ra;rd it asset end better fur puelic aelimitage. receive the Set reinent before the tire' :lay of rlec- - bill, ghost the items of which he knew tiothisig?— she whole or part of any emit ... tee which ease bet. each more likely to serve the ends of public nun, which Mies away will) the complaint, aid of ' Ir Is i d credit were given to the testimony of Car- fore them, as so them should seem proper. A mit. yoke, trot their Lordships should first decide tourer the rule movtlieritscherspet wish cogs. yell, Mere would lie an rut, of the action—es hr net might. in woe instances, speak iticortietlye .4 give laden:lent on the Demurrer, and then Mr. Herjearis Las. ackwwwir4gra Us it this. Plate- had email' that Mr. Hovels had confessed his ha- mid. in roh:ere, his deposeion might be peace* W. ly, ood ant till thou, open the matter of fart. meld of Ale Attorney-General war true. but the betty—h.* conduct, hoist-err, in calling on Mr. - Consistent with instil. en lit kited and trusted that no penes:, would Defendant had deceived Ili. Ctimphitianta by re- ithroes.. for the purpose of re citing is fleecier to Verdict for the Plriatiff. damages mi. whistle r 4 • - isle that he was desirous fir delay . Oa the fusing to &nosier whether he lied ur lied not weir- keep baek his evidence, renders him open to con- to the 4,100;00 of „ m.o. dos anstuany by rtai . 2., ....), lie had used every pessible care a n d lib. ied thy Sitersets.iit soletable siepieiou. 1 think tole were of declare- tiff to Defendant. ..: p e e, Linn the f i r s t, to have those matters breaglit Lord ELLitillatritoUGH--" I cannot hold, brother lion must beer been served on the Oeferideet. an d ...-aszaiarman . -: Os !re , * CeaCION100• The Court *honk' us,. Lime, tnat a causal tats at en election her a right to 1 veto got out of lii. heeds with his kiinwleile ; and OLD BAILEY, Norf. 11. emend that the retitled did not tile his declare- answer evert euestiou put to h u m by his electors. or I why, I wont , ' ink, should it be thus tarried to —............,... ) *nee the 11:/th of Mac. On the 16th of the i a parry oppose.• to I' ." Plaiiitiff's affee, without there was an tuteutioo of Jewett Ticker, a man of de. eat appeareche. as see is u:i (S. he (the Attrernee-Geoeval) filed. his Ltule dientisaed with costs .. gertiner lore to defend the emelt- ?" pnt to the bar to take his ensi, on en irtritelifillit F ea; aotaithstaudiare that by the practice of the : one luso, e. ItICII. i l'er.liet for the Plaintiff—damages 61. 11s. lesd. charging bun whit bewailing a SOW seal, in tbrbooest fan, I:e was entitl e d, by their oaths! stololgence, Mr.:GUMP.; mowed tot a Bute to phew cause I Mr. S•ojeant lle s r—ote e de n th e c is st i jalaitl i oud of Sir &lomat O'Brien Price. at Bromptoo,eorthe 'u beads farthertime. lie duleot, hnwevvr. avail - why the "err-bet - in tins indictment .hoidd not he i I will seek may mormoily.hy-o emit ednisia." _. . N 4.4 Amtalot jest .._ _ .__, , .. . ieseelf of my such indulgence or right, bat j set aside. or a new trial greeted. It WaS tetra be- j eExsoe v. eAt.t.OW. Mr. n0t.r.4110 stated the ease on the part of the -leideltortheithe What, on the other head, was I fore W. Justice Le Blanc nt the hot Assizes et This was an melon for the price of two pigs sold to prosecutor. ite ete conduct of the other side ? Netwithetandine Oxford, and a verdict given for the Crowie It the Defendant by Plaietlf. The cause was oot The first witness celled was William Tamer. thc 1 ' ' the earl,' 'whorls at which the mid pleas were Well, I wits as tisiitctruent egoista two belies, of the name d e fen led. Calker, it appeared, had elitere'l into b lack servanto fS ir Rd wer d 0' linen P r i or i. Hlo s t u s e 'l* Ile' Piintiffdoes sot tile his Demurrer till the 17th of lt.eb, fur nut repining; • bridge in Berke. He an a e reedient with the Plaintiff unthe eeth of Mly plll deposed, that on the Id of Align. , the Pirsesesee of June, etz seeks after he had flied bis decd ire- would net conteetti that, as the ow to , . of di , igo , mor, hat?, to purchase four pigs, for which he was 10 came to his master's hawse. and torik away I WWI. ' l ',` tire; sot hey he even yet thought fit to join issue they were not obliged to raper ; brit he would, pay itil. slid which were to he taken from Plain- City of cloth, under pretence that he acted in Boo- r u upon his own Demurrer. that they were net liable to rebuild. In the ore- tiff's premise% on the following tiny. At the stir- fortnite with tee Barerosi's dinetiens. He did OWL lit." The erguestwes upon the Demurrer may yet tells vent vai er. the hedge was blown dove. by the visi- relied time, Defendabt sent for two o f the pies ' ' know of the closet having bees beekeopen ; nett did slue, tithe Defeutfant plying. on Tuesday /text. mice, tif Guth, which could trot hare b e ret fereer. n ' hilt refits...l to take the other two, which were still h know any thing of the soil ehseh Is m od i the -- 1 mike Friday th en following . If the Plaint If be -or prevented by hum o* in-ons. It had oeeis de. In latent ars possessiou. ready to he delivered up.— I ground of t he iodic/meet. On his ere sseesendrow wet . r al ewe issuing to' oin in Demurrer. so es V. ;VIM tennuted iu retailer eouttanktnent on the sea-rood. Veidict lur Plaintiff--damages SI. prevaricated cousiderebly sato th.• Dumber w!te aerportenity 'divining the came argued on either : wiltre hresehes had been wade by storm , the wt est. it I. £ '1" r. release-NT. of place+ to *lnch his master had heed : and wee !Pi' those days, he (the Atterary.Gewerel) would comity was liable. Titus wad an meta)))) for the mete of certain goods, iw th some diffieulte induced to enures., ili elegised to •• early eerestage of lbw present motion, and go n Lord Ei.l.ltaatiltettoH---" Can you point nut alleged to be the properly of I'leintiff, which were waited open the Beronet st a lock -up- + ouve Year io old en the day already Axed. He then moved where a counts is teeter to tile visitutiou of God, improperly detained by D•fenitant. Temple Bar, oithisi the last two months. la: Nei Role, milling upon Sir Francis Burdett to sad individusis not ?" The Plaineiff, it appeared was a broker, and had John Wand, a Police Officer, beloneiog to Hat. • cause why the trial at bar, iu the action which I Mr. GLlgAne.. Certainly not, my Lord." ' supplied Sr Wm. Mennen, while in the King's ton-garden Office, deposed. that lie accompanl6l se ; i 'hnsight against Frani. Creefge Culemen, H.q. Mr. Ju.tiee Le BLANC••••" it may be very severe . Bench, with certain articles of furniture, whir h,on s ir Ed war d O'Brien Prior to the lodging. of the - which stands fixed firs the O.Oth Noe. instant, egonst the Lathes but certainly the case is very a the enlareensent of Sir Williern, hail been pieced pri s oner, in Baldwasegarrieme in company With s i, It ". . not lee p et ea ants! the temort eliould give strong egeseist thee). iu the custody of the present Dr fendant, as a sects- holier officer. untried Read, and a parish iroastetin he t , . rut upon the Demurrer tiled in the act t by t Rule relined. rity far the sum of 51. doe by Win-Nutley to him, w h o cattle wit h t h e Banter : h aving proCepard to 0 I , .................. lorouelit against the Hon. Charles Abbot." Mr. Pheasant, on his quitting the King's Bench, had the room pointed out es the residence of the Pei- COURT OF C031310N PLEAS, WetvalisTelt, Nov. it. I." Tit Celan inquired whether notices of tool had left the furniture in the care rif a Mr. Brie e; I , me ., he searched every place is tallith it was fro- a ren t in the two *miens upon which issue had who. beim; called on the 'me ,:f Ow Pleinti ff, dee likely the alleged stolen property could be coo. fer RILL v. HaRNIISS. joined ?—The Attortay•General auswered This action was isroaeht lay tee Plaintiff. an At- posed, than. its Atagnst 11407, lie knee Mr. Phi a- I vented : imienget other places. he carefully searched t tier, had t. y a on o c ourt e i , a d e b t o f 61 Its . 1 0 1 Iw o Mit lit the Kiug's Beech ;ehes he left it he pot a chest defrosters. tete wee suable to linel any thing by The ATTnitTt EY-GENERAL then added, that the ele tee le - -.1. v ie . i c tn ti r : e le s a by t ee D e fei:ilaite, who holds a situation 111 the gouda limier the care of the witness; Mr. Win- al l i v di c ou ld es tablials Ilse will' of the Pres en ter, mann nail 1.1.00 8 14 itemiser refine wertihstThe Proseciitor directed him to hook Ode the t.r. he ' r insole Offi ce; in conset melee of Plaintiff eteuley might have got them by peyieg ten pounds '" it 'NI or Moira. as Cornish!. of the TOW'''. f'' creilinga ii. his be- to Mr. l'imasent ; that w a s t h e sun , f or wliitat they drawers Keens ; and just as he w-is about to cumply tad ' *IY detaining him in custody there; to 'Oriel': heviug num tried cep tein law-pr i n half in an action on a bill of ruche's : gr. Before l were sectirey; m e . Ph easant had „la for Win- with his directions. im saw Howell. the collate's!e ah' • t Defendant hail also pleaded in ferns islet • ' • •, of t h e t aw . pra e rs oliaas, however, staidey, and Ile was perfectly aware of the eireum- who accempeuied the Baronet, put h.s hand into a rro - *sate nearly ps the Sur Carat at Arms h-el ne re ; vary i o i ;- l . - ; . 1 l ire pterre'senitnitl'Ulnelfendent hail Finnipeniniacd with . the st . auce.ttrh,enst. Mr. ph,„„ t went to t h e vomiter, drexer , winch hart been already minutelv ezamtned, g rs pea istth the a legation,. t sat pro- he left the i ct tts in charge of the wittietn, with di- id '• acted iii Incapacity of Constable as aforesaid. c pe.rs i mis g who were Plaintiffs itethat action, andan I bring forth the seal. On heing eiin--exelintied, were of course stopped ; and he now re . re etinna t o ,he seer them sill to m e w e d-y e an his he said that tic hail been a Police-riff, Cr time year., out h "waled anti Miura:l to receive and dentist pre. paying_ the lel.; but Winstenley iiever made to • aw l hers often iiriviit at the exeristion of search. tilt 're en reetely rosisioitted in him. The seine ree. .fer fr o t e ' i d l e u t - c oltty t ilr ie costs incurred. by the . steps teken Hill. The bill its tiiiestien oiler of any y. Ile mid lie would cell on Mr. warrant.; he did not think from the toirenesice he i " I. ' l4 'r"ltire. prevailed in this Retina to have the iu i I , • i ite c 1 • 1 Pheasant. sod if he did nut ply the lel. in s day h a d hail, that he could have overlook.ll the deal in t d.• ~.• . , eta. hero erects' by a ~.r. mrsnan, W it) Is urn' ie. or two, lie would forego all eight to the properly. IS' " that " lilted in the other ' naril ' A Y' tnat ceased . and eccep - ted by the Defendant. lei con- ''' I !.. ,''''i wean, tif law ehmild have the ereced"""Y r'i tl--e of its iiiiii-ouvruent a writ had 'semi it- tee search, which lie first inede. He d•I mot, Iwo. Ile never del call ; nor had the witness ever heard ever , mean t o cas t an y imputation Oa Riede II be to te e Miner of fact. Bot there we. also in this ac- p ". e. ' n e ti:4 ' s t rat i him, a ' eo - py o f ' which, mei notice of of hiiii si n ce. mail h r was served will, a no tic e of Baronet was wit•iiii a yard of the drawers at the :• 41 "' I " au additional re.sem : Mr. Viscay, Lord d.l r tien it appeared from the evidence of Mr. the action. The goods, he thought. were worth ' time the seal was found. t i r ' . l : ol ' : I. Solicitor. had butt recently heard that .1e.71. or al. He partieulerizeil the articles of furni- 'teed, the police -offizer, being ill, was tenable to , who is a must material witness lon lit. , Geo r ge e'l Hti ' l, th e brother of the Plaintiff, and who, at the time of the transaction, was .111.1141 rd as his tore which had beau in hie po.session, in a list attend. ['''"r Chad, I '4l absesit and with the army in Pio. cterk, had been left at Mr. lull's OE ,:v i with iii- which Pliontiff's Attorney presented Min. Henry Howell was then called end examined. I ' A tt r' i r she h is ' i ' h .1 e now arrv.ii t t with advantage - mown , to , ie , eli d the action . Me. G eo r ge D i ll As this witness, though called on the part of the lie e epeee d, t h a t h e was a con st a ble o f M o ry.le. wk. to e, ~ cou nt ry. o f arid honour to himself. with tile ,' wan totally ~,,o rant o r th e p e rson w ho brou 6t lit Fialistiff. hod sworn to. facts, which, if believed. bone parish ; and that on the sd of August, he was ' ' 44 t '' g h Bridirf.rstatsal a s o h s evinced in lies i h at t , e . ~ t i me th a t they mottle directly against him—Mr. Pitcher. the c elled o i l by the Persecutor, rod at 11•• desire *- tors f•• l bon d i _ ,.. _ t battle mein ; but. e supposed i still . d 1t at the rezent of Hilair,. were sent by direetion of Mr. Harness. Ile had Plaintiff's Ott ttttt ey, was produced for the purpose coinpattie.l him to the Hatton-garden Pulictemffice. •.' applinifien ht ad bemade t the W•r-Oh- when, a warrant was procured for the purpose of Mee h•.,,, tann a been I never seen Mr. Hiram. at his twother's M11e..; he of contradicting his statement. i ilir rd. a' he knew of leis alowitcr, for his re- b e d c e lled un hint twice at the Transport -Ogler ; Mr. Serjeant Bore ohjected to the Counsel on searching the lodgings oh' the Posoner. Ida pre. the . el; lgist that suit return to this: entintre could suit October ihepreve nted the bid the part of the Plaintiff ca lling evidence fur the eeeded with the Baroeet. Wood. and Beads to once in IOC). when . P Ice h. ti me for t h e t r i a l, and lie had eln - of conch , at which lime Mr. Heflin. stated that he purloin' orcontrailicting his own wttness. itoeii eon s toth ' Beldwin's-gardees. On the way thither the Bann 0. ,„ th , , at e ff ect. On these eronnile, he moved would call on Mr. Hill on the following day ; am ' Lord Chief Jeetice M etallize') over-ruled the ne t t this trial also 'should be put o il, directed him to be very diligent in his sestehtte. t to k l ind E so t to . when he served hins with the copy ofd writ ohjectiem It frequently leappeued that eitneeseo, M r . Bartlett, the leadgfed of the house, hints( ~,, ~,, .. is , i, 4 di t.t.exatteneete—o Take three Butes oho% they came into Court, spoke very differently pointed out the room which had beets occupied by nu the lld ofJanuary lett. from what they bud given reason to suppose they 51 K uhr ,Vti nct Rule in each action ;end let copies Robert Carrell, win was also • clerk is Plain- r „.. I L., P r °' - e . cdinea, as hitherto had, be delivered to efts office at the time the copy of the writ was left would. and completely deceived the Counsel fur wed it. and commenced their searches; while the Prisoner, she Bironet, Wood, and . Raid _ea- . , ,e. . ic t ` t ,' - i. "'"ht in time. The Coert will find it H erethe party in whose vault' they there. deposed that lie had reversers Mr. Ilitite.s. Ice del not think it improper, where such *as the tempts which might be made at concealment by l „., , at ,„" ur proems of each actiou to be in possestion at hill master'. office, but he had taken •bII of Wuhan,;' etre), . that evidence of a different description should . ' l ''''' The AT rests to Defend tot at the Transport Office. at an ease. be cilled.- 1 1 )'on know. brother Best, you did the persons in the house. •He was at length allied 1...•• 1 6 am I. ll teito-Gitrenet. answered—that care reviler pesiod in the busiuess than thet mentioned ... ri. . hov,. take" to *imply their Lordships with Itv 14,t wit at a /vial time Mr. Dames* said, the slime thing iu the famous horse cense." into the room, and desired' by the Baronet tonarch a drawer iii a cheat of decimate, and haviag mee t it.: 10 Tni • ,s,:iette document. that lie would call ned settle with the Plaintiff.— hl r. Pitcher was then examined.—The substance amongst some old reg.. he foiled • gold mal e which i l .: •, n uke !Vial were all granted. Ile lied iIeVII with Mr. 11 trims very lately, midi.: of his deposition was, that he hail liven told by Mr. the Baronet immediately cleansed as his. At that ''' I- the intioaing c i ranns t ac ces t —lle understood that Phemaut th it hi. lite on the goods was but 51. ; time Wood and Read weee examining some mere „ ri.e A THU met; r. ?MU IPS. ": i ' . 14 tu 'aarr-GEti vita/. A t well cease se-sleet Mr. Ilia; iiit e mled to rehpirne liiin (the witnesa) on and that when Bruce, tin: last witness, was applied at a table is the m i n o f t h e mot On being I N ab 141°44 by No Setteent Leos, spins. the ( f .-e pre.xat 'rue, end In Consequence be called to, to deliver up the property on memo of that croaa . caate med by Mr. R o y m i a l o , c ease ' s ' f or tea OLD BAILEY, Nov. 11. James Tacker. a man Of d« eat appearar.br o pnt to the ti.ir to take kis Anal, on an ineficheinot charging him »iih 4trollialg 4 µOld teal, in thehnnear or Sir &l earn' O'Brien Price. at Bromptenowthe *l4 Ananeet - Mr. DOLlANDatated the ease on the pert attar prosecutor. The first witness called was William Torun , . the black serrantofSir Edward 0' linen Priest. He sins. ply deposed, that on the Id of Align. , the ers..i.ao,4 came to his mailer's hawse, and took away it qsaii tity of cloth, under pretence that he meted in coo• fortuity with the Baronet's dir.cticaui. He did nit know of the closet having bees brokeopen ; nor tbii koow any thing of the seal shish fa mod: th e ground of the indictment. On his crew-cretainia. tion. hr prevaricated couriderably sato thi• number of place+ to which his master bed herd ; end we* w th some difficulty indueed to enures.. th t bolted waited open the Baronet at a lock-op-I omit Near Temple Bar, oithisi the last two months. John Wand, a Police Officer, belonciiig to Mate ton-garden Office. deposed, that Ire accoinpawbed Sir Edward O'Brien Price to the lodging* of deo Prisoner. in Baldwin's-gaolers., in company with a brother officer, mimed Bead. and a parish coastable who came with the Baronet: hieing proceeded to the room pointed out as the residence of the Pei a me., he searched ev• ry place in *loth it was likely the alleged stolen property could be coo. yeah-el ; ironing.% other pliers, he carefully searched a chest of drawers. tins was enable to GM any thing whiadi could establish the goilt of the Prisotier.--• The Proseciitor directed him to look Ode the drawers again ; and joist as he wis about to comply with his tlirecttons, ha saw Howell, the constable who accompanied the Baronet, put ba hand into a drover, winch had been already minurrle examined, an I bring forth the seal. On !Willa eli , 4--eziainitied, he said that he hail been a Police-officer mote year., and loon often pre,,nt at the exertslion of siotrch.. warrant.; he did not think from the estierielice he had had, that he could have overlook.d the seal in the search which he first made. He d.l not, new. ever, 111P1111 to cast any lou v utot.ot:i oa Fil..oci!. floe Baronet was 'virtu,' n yard of the drawers at dui time the seal was found. Head, the police-offizer, bring ill, was enable to attend. Henry Howell was then called end 'semirigid. Ile deposed, that he was a can-table of Maryde bone parish ; and that on the 3d of August, he wia calleft ou by the Proscutor, and et b.. desire ac companied him to the Hatton-Karsten Police-ngfine. whet.: a warrant was procnred for the purpose of searching the Waging, of the Prisoner. lie pep . ceed e d with the ilaro.iet. Wood. and Reeds to Balilwin'a.gardena. On the way thither the Bare. net direeted him to be very diligent in his seercite. Mr. Bartlett, the leadl‘d of the house, heron pointed out the room which hod beer occupied by the Prisoner ' she Baronet, Wood. and Brad ea tend it. an d commence.l their searches; while Witness remained 01 the stain to preveot any at. tempts which might be made at concealment by the persons in the house. He was at length called into the room, and desired' by the Baronet to arercb a drawer in a cheat of drawere. and bootleg ene s ilst amongst some old reg.. he fatted • gold At the Baronet immediately clanked se hie. At that --• time Wood mitt Read nere examining mese perm et • table is the caters of the room. Ou being crowtaautieed by Mr. Rrytield%Conesel fat tits NSTAN LET r. P:II.I7ANT. Tills was eu acunn fur the value of certain goods, alleged to be the propery of Plaintiff, which were tin properly detained by o.•fenitaiit. The Plaintiff, it appeared was a broker, and had supplied Mu Wm. Manners, while iii the King's Bench, with certain article,* of furniture, a hit h, on the enlargement of Sir William, had been placed ill the custody of the present D.fendant, as a secu rity for the sum of 51. due by Wm-Wiley to him. Mr. Pheasant, on his quitting .he King's Bench, had left the furniture in the care of a Mr. Btu. e ; who, being called on the part u:1 the Plaintiff, de posed, that. its August 11.407. he kiwis Mr. Ph. a. emit in the Mug's Beech ; lath n he left it he put the goods under the care of the witness; Mr. Win stauley might have got them by paying lee pounds to Mr. Pheasant ; that was the sum fur W:ncli thew were security; Mr. Pheasant hail sent for Win staidey, awl he was perfectly aware of the circum- Wailer. When Mr. Pheasant went to the century, he left the goods In charge of the witness, with di rections to deliver theirs op to 11'instaiil-y. on his perm. , the 101. ; but Winstanley newer Made an infer of any y. Ile said he would call on Mr. Pheasant. and if he did nut ply the 101. in a day or two, he would forego all right to the property. Ile never dad call ; nor had the witness ever heart, of hint since, mail he was served with • notice of the action. The goods, he thought. were worth 71. or Si. He partseuleriseil the articles of furni ture which had beau in his possession, in a list which Plinistifrs Attorney presented hum. As this witness, though Yelled on the part of the Plaintiff, hod isworu to. facts, which, if believed. made directly against him—Mr. Pitcher, the Plaintiffs Attorney, was produced for the purpose of contradicting his statement. Mr. ierjeant BM objected to the Counsel on the part of the Plaintiff calling evidence fur the purpose orcontrailicting his own witness. Lord Chief dustier Nlasistino over-ruled the objection. It frequently leappeued that witnesses, when they came into Court, spoke very differently from what they haul given reason to suppose they would, and completely deceived the Counsel fur the party in whose behalf thew were called; and he did not think it improper, where such was the case, that evidence of a different description should ealled.—tt Vet know, brother Best. you did the **roe thing in the famous horse cause." Mr. Pitcher was then essinined.—The substance of his deposition was, that he hail liven told by Mr. Pheasant di it his lite on the goods was but 51. ; and that when Bruce, the last witness. was applied to, to deliver up the property on payment of that u at sr hal 3.. Y f4'e 110 11 r ID ID (.0 dor Cut t Ito. 91