The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-01-10 00:00:00

rited, because yon would have oasictiotied. that I‘:.lg troiti of insult and elllCrusictiotest which yore. to fol low, sod of which the prosecution of Licuttoast- Colonel Munro would have proved to be roily the first experimental step. I. it is admitted that the **mint to bold Courts Martiol is addressed to the Comoisoiler.inwelliel; and we deem Ms authority excluout is tlwt brooch of the public Adininuaration. But the abuoe of u legal power is ; wail& supreme m il i ta r y contrail of the Government in Council extends, iu our juegmetit, and beyond all doubt, to the pret et-- toilet such abuse.. This dors not ouppose au ha bittiol sail hobs., iaterivreocr. overt only for the Government of fort it, George, a right cod a legal power to come, ill extraordinary costs, to the support of their own authority, and alpinist swalitiouo rocroachinont*conibirserl a ith the oppres sion of innocent mem, by a gross eihil.e the Pow" cootiM to the Commander-la-Chief, io the &rec. boa of military prosecution'. 53. If this o onion were wrong, there are higher st•hoeitieo, %%110 licett power to proni.a.o.•_• tt rrrn. I • I ` . • aid to provide another reined) ; winch in t. •ase would be necessary. for the evil supposed. 5... In tip mean while your opinion *sr binding, and. rvh.w confirmed loy ours, us still more so on the . sray oli Fort St. Grin. ;r, who are not the judger • eithaviu the first or last resort osi tbill subject. • b . *. This is not a ipiestioti in which toe Officers of Army could be justified to interfere. It coo cern . the extent of yorlegal power. under the cone ✓itiation of your Government ; upon is which tits). eirilot sit to jit igment. If the Calm 411141 c• .111 • •r, Lieutenai.i•lieneral play Macdowall differed W. 1.) yet*, as he affects to do. on th it pont', he might • have properly stated •it to the Court of thee' toes and to Fits Majesty's Goveritnienl, kr their deci. tuna ; but, when he appealed that ipteicion to the army. wittili is subject to your authoritv is lodis e as he dud hr his General Older of the Nth Jam,- 'try, he carried that eontraversy to • tribunal. the incompetence of which he well knee ; and before alum. the agitation of such a Vacation. as it could teal to no awful conclusion, o it assidd h.. 4 1 , fail to kindle airimeeity and recite discord. tendril( assuredly to entree mode or other of public disorder, sod perhaps eventually to Military trombonist:sabot s gesit tostitsy itself ; iu the progress of which, cals . usifig sail dostress were sure to fall tiro and bearita es les otru friesols and essiseistes. • a. W. pass naturally from the 'Griped Order jest 'mentioned, to the dianWeisl of the Officers who • published it to the army : and our aentnuruta nn Mitt subject must sestavialli• depend on the opinion we entertain of the chummier end tendency of the esslor iteett se. In deliberately otithe aratikct, a e hive not .1414014 erawebtes booed •Isy the fono under which re aoisamoeir and rail portico ef this paper has, Orr *basses resseos, lidos' siirtitiod. ..///. It pupal* to peeft e shoond to Lieutenant . Gilead Monte; but - substaatielly it conveys to • ever/ ilea a reprimand is the Goverueperst of Fort e OtUeorips; sad that reprimand is addrerasd to the • Army subject ',jos authority. The subject matter p6ll the emesetre. Massed .swami* es Cut. %limr,a, $ *odors it iameeperelile from a omega en the Govern : nasal, Xbe alga& charged ars that Officer, in ,"' a oppool impmmi to spie thoTtani bia I, e . s t it hme ia ce C i oa sia nci .l346 l. f r r . o l o u rs .chic an ar t: Elmthecasowsi Order itself. inform. the Army, appal Sikh he the subject of has reprimand, . nos bp she reproof, bet by the ;outer. , oll isisa reivermestrt. • Linframart•Colond Meer* had eshaushed imilleletwesses ba peaseseed of obtaining rein f from :ilbeeemeeitadeherstbief himself. This it was luta ' duty te de in the first instance. But when justice - iras denied in that quarter, and when the hand of . persecution pruned chase upon hint. we are deci- - dedly of edicion, that he had a rlOll to claim the ' • preteetint of the Itiapreine Military authority, which is vested by law in the Governor in Council of Fort • lit. Cantle. 59. If that Government poloessed ii. legntl power to intervene in a case of at,ase, it could not he cri trowel in the party eufering wider it to chint their protection; and the calalsoct of lariitenant•t:olottel Munro could net justly be wok the subject of a reprimand. 60. That the Government of Feet St. George is wet entrained by law from this putical.ir eaett:t.e of the Supreme Military rowers. which it pottimeotots; wet acknowledged by Lieut enant-Generail Macs deceit himself, since he obeyed their order for the release of tient...Gime. Munro. If that order had net ably been an undue encvolchment on his eon authonty et Ceramarder•in-Chit f, but had teen beyond the l and competent powers 6f those the ..1 ho issued it: ri Ceseeold not hare been hound to obey it, as be distinctly pleased himself to be. li. The nevernmett or Tort St. George did not exceed. therfore, their legal powers ; and the only question thef could he made was, is Bather they exercroed them properly in the particular instance. On that point, undoubtedly, the Government of Fort St. Geer4e is saliett to the risponsibility which it inseparable from the sterciee of all Jeles wed authority. Set le lows tribunal are they adien Ode I Where was it prim? Where was it fee the politic ietereet, that Lientenent-General Itlerdowall shoal., carry his appeal ? To the army of tort St. George, or to the iiiiig aud Court of Oiceetnes 61. That he shmald towers this curstion to the army, in the shape or • repeomand to Imutrilant- Colette! MOM% appears to he ta contradiction to his own pediments em the sullert. a 4 we have Dual 'fated them; fur, it the eiarerement of tort St. George had a legal power to release lieuesCisionel Munro e it could not be Crernlaa:-...et could not, in any mo d e o r degree, he ealpsbic—it could not tits •cnr the penalty of a reprianand—best it was his clear rigta sad pnrilege to clams the legal sod compettol protection of Geiverom.mt from the cypreseiou of die Cemosander-00-Chirf. 64. If the Government, on the contrary, did oat: possess those powers, Liese.-Griteral tliscdowelli owed them no obedieoct. W. if tit! ierlity 01 those pn vets be ditto& anti. tibetandang the testimony borne to it bt • ut.- l;t- it. Marderwall s stannission, it . is egaidlb be caked, to what tnhanal that dtspeted - littestieb nrll.la to have bees sulvinittert—To the Atnty • oe to thr :••• ',tern.. Asthenia , * Is F.nglasti? -,. It IR alga to be inquired, whether, is s con tl4, cry h. tv ten tbeCtiemtioticr-sn-Ch:t.f Lai ttle Goverume;,t, concerning the limits tit 24.7 . ppettive• authorities, it was It. that t liener4l aliould arrogate the &Kilns to himself; ruin , saw:booed alone by hi aim Opinion iu his own cave, should inflict a scverepuisishisent on Lieutenant-Colonel Munro, for having acted on a different *pinion ; but one which had been sup ported by the . judgmelit of the Government, that is to say, of Isisutitheril v, and or • military authority, to while that of theCommander-in-Chief, and of the whole army, is motile subordinate, by an act of the nu itiah Legisloture--an authority to which they owed iiilpheit obi:alcove ;. and whit% must, at the eery least, have been fettle challenge aullicient re spect to exempt ail ituividetail Officer from the im putatiou of a ermine tor 'yin% acted conformably to it. 66. The reprimand to Lient..Col. Munro there. fore was not only not necessary, but it was unjust, and inconsistent with the principle which Lieut.. General film:dowell had himself professed. 67. For these mantis, we consider the shape given to thirGetieral Order of the 28th Jauaary•as merely colourable; and se are of opininu, that the reprimand to Lieutenant-Colonel filtioro etas evidently intended only as a vehicle for circulating throughout the Army serving tinder the Govern ment of Fort St. George, a vehement and intem perate public censure of that Grover ttttt eut, and an inflammatory address to the professional feelings of that army. oil topics thought likely to produce irritation and disorder. It ma., in ot:.er words ti most seditious paper, under the title of a General Order to the Army, and hearing the thin disguise of a reprimand to a particular officer. 68. That this attempt to excite irritation, and to pr..(loce disorder by conduct amongst officers of the army, has not been entirely unsuccessful, we lament the nec•••sity of acknowledging : and that those designs have nevertheless been substantially Ints hated, and hive failed in far the greater pert, we have a cordial satisfaction in ascribing first to the nod arose of the army at large, whicl► could not Ix misled by fallacies so easily detected ; but next and principally to the firm attachment to the duties of their profession, and to that Strad y loyalty sod ►ncorruptible .fidelity. which. in that army, we are confident, sill ever be found proof Ultima the arts and seductioul of facti4n. Notwithatanding the sentiments we have ex pressed couceriang the true nature and tendency of the General Order in question. we have not neglected to consider whether the officers who gave it currency, by the orders of the Commander-M. Chief, were friporibi Isle for its criminal purport, and were, on that account, justly removed from their offices. 705 , . Ls deliberating upon this question, no re- - sortid naturally to such general principles, appli calk to the subject, as we thstight best established, and unlit free from doubt. ~ 71. The follossiag pragiiitAions have appeared ti all of thakeleseription ' First—Tiara, as a gerreral principle, • military officer is net only jostled in obeying aka order of his sroperior, but that lie is bound to do so ultimata regard to the (virility of the order. Under this head we consider the Adjutant-General as obliged, in a peculiar' asaorier, by the duties of his office, to pub hall to the army any orders which the Conini.rati on-Chief may coinriait to him for that purpose.-- We are clearly of Ppinion. as a general pisuciple, that the Adjutant-General is not bound to deli. berate on the propriety of thy miler which he is co:113,110rd to issue ; that it would he a breach of military dutyro do so; that he is Merely ministerial in tin fu ire lqns.sei uot re spom hie, pc rsonally, for the propriety or impropriety of the orders he may cireelate officially to the army. 72. Wllllegurd the,e principles as very impotent, and, :u a ur.stsasr, faticlanAistal is the theory of ml• liter, subordination. Secondly—We consider, hoc ever, as net less es tablished, that the general principle shove stated is sahject to exceptimead modification. The Mb. dificatioo by which the gesierel principle of simple obedience ought to be limited, is, in our judg ment, tin: criminal orders are not to be obeyed ; sad that the officer who ex-cutes a eriinioal order of his superior is pentoo ally responsible for h eaaduct. We look upon this mullificution of the geasad military principle as forthiog itself • great and primitive principle, not less important aad fundamental for the civil secu rity or society, than %se allow the other maxim of implicit obedience to be for the doe support of mi litary selsordinatiiin. 73. Cossidering then, as we have already stated, the General Order of the '23:h of January as a sedi tious paper, wr inixlit at once pronoiince the Adju taut soil Deputy- distant-General guilty of web . non. by the publication of that order. notwilhalans& taw the authority under which they acted. 4. But that indent.-tit would out be justified by the lucre criminality of the order which t lit y issued; and it is necessary. its order to establi:th their parti cipation in the crime. anti to render them person ally responsible. to skew that they were acquaint ed with the seditious character of the paper. 76. In heating nor judgment upon this point. we lime not considered it as ou abstract question, but as tit to be combined with all the circumstances of the case, and especially with those in which the patties concerned were placed ; and from this view of the question, it has. in our opinion. - resulted. that Colima Capper and Major Boles are to he considered as partaking personally in this act of bent... Gen. Macdotsull. and as deeply responsible free ins poseesis:ious and crisuitad tentieney. 710. Refiwe Ih t• order was prepared, it was not only Inman to those two confidential staff officers of the Commenter-in-Chief, hut it was onearinue to the whole seaiy and settlement. that time 'was a warm and vehement dismission between the Com mander-iii-Chief and the 4:overnment. These (Meer. were aentianited with the prosecution of Itentenant-t'oloorl Munro. and the part which Limitelinnt-General Macilowall had taken in that proceed's". They knew that every step in that extraordinary tr.inwictesis was a studied insult to the fiarernment. They knew that Lieutewent- General Macdowall had. become the patron marl channel of a Memorial to the t7oiset of Direetore, highly appropied by the President in Council of Fart St. George. by which be had I • self, at the iisatauce cif t h at Government, and at t n distant pe riod, written cirvitlar lettere to discos -Aire sod imp prem. bat which. iu riper star of hostility to- 'earls the penal. outliority ON the Genres?. tie had coomeisai.ved asd •pestuuted. It is, to tine. superfluous p;uve what IS loqOvid dentit. and is not denied, that It musts, pasimoriate rnistbre had broken out between these two high authoritio. 77. The Commaniter.ia-Chielof an army. m ea open dud ardent oppositiou ti the Gioverittneut which he serves, it no trivial event, and constitutes a state of things from which none cousegneuces applicable to this question have appeared to us to follow. 7`. We consider their circumstaucte. thereforei as turoishiug a new modiaciniun of the military principle brat asserted ; and we are of opinion, that in such extraordinary and momentous iiiierseuries. it it fit end necrttery to require, that as Aker whose duty it it to give currency to the indent of the Contioander-in-Chief, should, contrary to the general principle of blind obedience which ought to prevail ur ordinary times, direfully consider these orders. sod deliberote seriously upon their nature and purview. before he pulibehes theta. The cir culatiou, in heated arid ruining times, of a seditious address to the army, has uo &otology to the principle of military obedience, to • military order in thr common (bo l eti' h of sod cannot be govern ed by the seine rules. 79. We are. after mach and serious reflection, decidedly of opinion, that this restriction of the mi litary principle. the general Importance of which we nevertheless feel most sensibly, cannot impair the obligations of military subordination and obedience, in any manner or degree, prejudiciul to the natural and legitimate o'ljecta of military co iiiiii mod ; cod that, in times of trouble, it way afford a must solo tury and necessary protection to the Government mud people. ageing the possible perversion of nolitari supremacy telhe purpehes of teilltiOti or faction. be. In a natural and wholesome at lie of things. the obedience of subordinate °the. rs is to be idiot ; admitting of 110 deliberation, end soLjeet to no responsibility. except for plain and insuifest crimes. lu ?Mai distempered seasons of open con tention' with Governmerits as are now in question, addresses from Commanders-in-Chief to their ar mies, hating reference to such debate., are a tit subject of deliberation to those whose office it may be to transit:in them; and a rommisihrlity belhoging exclusively to such occasions, toast attach even to their official and 'Muntenia acts. 01. in conformity with the , e sentiments, we have no douht of the responsibility of the late Adjutant and Deputy-Adjutant-General of your army, un the occasion of publishing the General Order of the 38 t h January; and ire are of opinion, that if the author of that order is himself guilty of st di tion. u we esteem him to be, these contidertini °thefts of the Staff, who cotiserited to be the in struments of his crime. are under ail the circum stances implicated in the guilt and snbject to the penalties of the offence. 42. If there mere doubt, however, upon this gory firm, which, as weighing general and fund/noel:tol principles against particular modifications of them, must always be s delicate one. we cannot quit the subject without repeating, that it is not a tit matter for the iiithrference of the army itself. In what particulars a tidiest may consist; snder what dr comstances the Official instrumentality of an officer in the critne of • superior, shall subject film to per soaal responsibility, are questious to be dist.ussed in colder blood, and by a ditfereat description of coun sellors than are alwacs to be found in numerous bo dies at a period of Lent and irritation. They are worthy of the inforfted sod *partial deliberation of lii. 1111.4jesty's coufi.lential Savants lad Achim,* and of t'.;e fttipreine Rulers of the *nay of Will the llonourAhle the Court of Direictoys. ed. To snatch a question of diet nature and ins: portsoce from the decision of thaw anthorities, at thy very moment of its foe rind reference to their judgment, and to east it as a source of discordant violence into the midst of an army already warmly agitated, is the part of incendiaries and not of &wads, either to the army or the State: It is a great crime, and being that of which the officers, who hare lately expert...iced the murk. of your dis pleasure have appeared to you on a careful investi gation of the facts to have been guilty, we have no hesitation, although we deeply lament the occasion of this necessary oeverity, in approviag and Cora mending the vigilant truer?! wilts sr hAlt yon have in 11 s• man of great difficulty amid dat:ger asserted the legal untharity of your Curti-mut lit. presente4 the factious contagion from spreading through the tionouralile awl hitherto untainted ranks of -the Coast Army. and provided for the recurity and lb. , tegrity of the British. Empire in India. - Va. Yon mitt pereetse. that Much 'or what MU' been said on the Menthael, is apjihscable Address to Major Boles. 85. This is a:.• n nseasiire connected with a military combination. • it assumes the cognizance of a tenedion which belongs to littler foal higher It'proitoti:lcei. in the name of drally, open censure of the Goserunient, which lie arum' is bound to •bey. • In these respects it mamas on the same foot ing, and partaken us sill the eri j aiinthisialthe paper or bare already corwideresi. oust there js. in the addreire to Major Boles. a character of transcend ant guilt and danger. which is peculiar to itself. • We allude to the scheme of which it professes to lay the foundation, of a combinitinn of private power to contest with the poorer of GurtrAttunC °victimised resources of resistance, mutual support against the hand of justice; and indemnity egoista the legal corioe i rsence of crime's. • e 7. We do not know how it is possible to approach much nearer that erlreme crier,, which he so em phatically menaced is the Memorial, without reach ing it. We treat, however, confidentl , y, that those who have been improvidently betrayed unto thosedop perate cows, s, will have been awakened to a sense of their perilous situation ; and that by arresting the progress of the foreman, you will have saved their inconsidecite folowers front the ruin and dishonour to which their leaders were contacting them. SC With Tepid to those who have t.krn a lead hie part in those criminal transactions, we ksl that every principle of tried and established policy, appli cable to such conjunctures, and every obligation of your hula. forbad the eitension towaids them of a false and miischievous leaky. 8:.. %Ve cantor also entirely in the sentiments Cr.. preSnd is your. Genera! Ostlers 'of the Ist ult. that it is not sofficieot for Akers bottling comrosoJs to avoid partleriation it, such procteattigs. but that it is time posittvc sod ioJispeasable dsty to adort the ,0 4 rejillY , V % a * 4 ti ,ott*. matt dec;tlGA nenserat foe their sipmession report,, &m to the superior authorities. lbe poses.of tumult and se,iiPtod may as etreettolj proinoted 'by their aezatiu4oncurrence as ty t actiVe patticipatiose. • 4v , pt. The neglect ofdoar.is an offet,c e e • only in degree from a petsarius einlatin n nt• it any o f those wee, apprized of the pro ven , 0( - der!, procieedinp among those who ate pltred um, hia irateediute coutroul, abstains from any attemp t , supprcwas them. either by the exertion of hi s nn „, thGrity, or by an appeal to the superio r p ew " , i ; to dune procee.fings one tort of encoltragens.p., cannot statid.absolved of blame, nor fn usi d imemtnity. much less to a contiemaate of that : , pikit e , raidence. which is attached to station,, authwity, on the basis of so culpable arta s 4 chievous a neutrality. 91. From the whole of the preceding liseuti n you will naturally infer. that we consider the e.tre it charged against those off cert. whom ye , ' L. judgei it necessary to suspend or deprive of 'Leif imin - tment and etimmands, fully jUstlying-t'; spective degrees of punis:uneut witiCh you h.. lotted to them. 92. The local means and advantage* wh:th possess, as well.as the great delicacy of the log :i rt have necessarily placed the application of tone cipks to individuals, and the inveatigatioo particular cases under your exclusive cognisan t , and we have only to express that entire con Bence which is due to your station and ch ar lets, in the justice and impartiality not le , s the vigilance and activity of your proceedings scrutiny so pectdiarly circumstanced. 9S. We observed with siitisfaction that the ze tenor of the replies to the Circular Letter add. by Major-General Gowdie, to the uffivors outs ing at the several stations of the army, confirms opinion which we have e rirrested of the loyalty the major past of the officers of your establishmeta. 94. In a.aming you, therefore, of the firm port of. this Government, in maintaining a whitlt ilvolves all that is must dror to our S uo , rti7n and country, if, contrary to our ardent iota and sanguine hope, a:;y !utnre call shotild yet be rte 2 °a dm power and energy cf your Government wt.,* :nay require oar aid ; we will conclude, h 00e ,,, , with expreraiog our fondest wish and expectat, that Cie !ate afflicting agitations should subsi,le -elm and reasonable tpilasest on the wisdom anl rice of the high authorities to which etre transact., of this troubled period hare been advocated, v.'. those demonstrations of respect and obedience, are due not more to your station, than to th, f„ t h. ful and honourable j discharge of all your pebl ic h difficult duties , whicb, in our opioism. basernmea'y .fistingaished the present (iovetorne..t of fun Sc. Geoige. 95. Such a relish will be meet acceptable to accordant with our views of the public irw-rest. most congenial with Acne s'atimeots 01 • ia:tioa r.l respect towar4s 111Fatiny of the coast winch we co:. dially profit.. and remain assured that we shaft oev have Kaman to renounce. W e hare the honour to Iv, honoured Sir, your most obedieut. humble seesaw., bate i Uiam, %lAy 57, flog. ,~,1 :sIIEtI, (A tree crpy) 11O1nr. (Signer') . I. FAt Ci/NA ChlFi..c. to iievcauss.l AVAL lATICI.LIGANCE. ruarsleuvrat, AVI. S. Armed the Sias*. with • tre.•,l fro; 00:1 Downs; amfteg thew are die TrqfficLu, fnr Gi taller Cato, Majvr, and Triton. treevietilli. I.l . l.lrMitt TII DOCI. JAL The Prierece. Cherleite sailed fruits tit. lie:rni the 43.1 Nuileintier ; hoeing had an astou:iii.ng quick passage wif only six weeks and a day 19t:a Laud's Egol. Slay had seven lothainen under coo voy, but parted from the 11/41.1'S in a gale; dos not, how ever, rsstertain any apprehensions fur the., safeth•or would hare lain by for diem The Ca raise, which kw g•rtgivegl so "wag sad so suctes,fin• ly against the British rummer's, was taken at as• char in Isle Bourbon, as wine also four odor French vessels, and several 'others. The property &Anil liiiffe it immense. and our troops sad sea. men, highly elated, were 'nuking arrangements kr Ise attack on the Isle of France, which world as• iiikitate the enemy's power in the Indian seas. • COUIME OF EX , aersterdere 3i o 1 U. OM° at Mild at ti Roundel...". 9 49 t V. Hamburg} 09 Alton! en 1 41C. Parill o.tte 2 CO to Bourikaas 9O 41 F.R. Mhdril Whoa 4l PAlcras• itsJ. Pis Os. loxlt‘as Mies! 42 Genoa S.lll* ine Si N. Lila Livens 6.! ,CHANGE, J•s. S. Opmett Jsseiro 7 ' Malts GiUrsliss 261 Dahlia 9i is auLuor, Portsgal Gold is Csis - - stud Bare per rweituGuld mien— OtruNnoss New Do:ture. — • • scr iu Ilvr — Nem Loma Apo of Hie Baok of Hoo.w. 4 per Ccet. 16N Y E•T &Limit (!ge PNICL rlt bill a poLCast.ladairea • prr Ceia Couasta 111 per Cott a per Ct al. a•y Units A noviews i;Air t VII A Lila LUC. 11M1i161161 ladia Doak garbeiwar VII Erleisli Lawry rat Is'. Canasta fur -OR I T. BUM, Slob-lhalier Curalailf aed a, Clisn'4' •41 &jog div. • • • ex dm. last ...... 3 pron. :; 1:11 prem. isprein. • - DEATItS. On Friday' lan, the isfaut daughter d R C. Rao PC Sarni stseet, Strand. At to. no-oit to sally esteemed, on 17th Roseveher. Or" . tl'itu)s, cornmauder of H 4 . 1C , t)'11 Skp -•• tt her in huo loth tree. lie bet a leg in the halts ^t " soraittrable Ist of Jose, mot softer a contain punt"' I of the too-1 kussouoalne services, he wail est oel • • prune of life, niter a short Micas, is 11:e pr • host &stint:ions of that -prafasaius shah ' ' and in the full attainment of rray cline hop inc, to limiest their irreparable las a re,st • • asJ tmeo-isiast rhilds ea. Its relosSos or. re .:.t...,- •• 3 essiftlley %wiener" at Hslifss, ur pith Iso so • - MUM WATER AT LONDON inuoka. uOrinig i 42 miss. •Rn 5 Afteriwou as Li ntxl. —,'mate.' try• C • • ei , inkl plabllalwAl al !Le , Mery No I‘, S Chart kStrood, try J. %%HITE, a v.- , lie !u, •N raper, scut to itmt OS, • , • a I doll) .1..c..,JeJ It. pnriequi ~:Wi: ~~r Tiill ll . r Brill NI •:k To-.twi lwer : r wr.M' NF «. L ▪ e. • t. Ina!, tri, " 11 ▪ MM. LAt r ...ley day, th ~ruE~ ~ilEl FATfr 11,1+ Sir AM I t . Wren ; le tiro Tualst !row , I reel ; v. rma,p, 1 K. end is Saul tow*, I —..liag To-foo , s Ten '.6.11 ►ir Ai SE 171 : 11 - 11 'lllla Per* i P, l LUsy I Tow, I Po. p, Bel 1111.1 4 4 N r thas 4 IP arm I- Isar. ihati A i( Ira le Ina/ Thu Amu ts, ha Ni ars. am. le saw rfhe A 14. e! Abe t I lit & 1 I. tyiiii I . •I the IN.: (