The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-02-14 00:00:00

LA I . INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, FnipAy, FEB. 13. L. of Prim: Orr Mbar!, Term, &fon . the LOAD CHIEF JUSTICE. PITILLIPA r. TAYLOR. 11.0 was an action to 'reviver 61. l Is. ad. for rent due ftr the ocvapet:on of furnished apartments. 'The defence was, that the t taiii:tff 'tad net performed the contract on her part, which was so give attendance and net..nary utensils; whereas there was no !elder for the tire-place, a basin and chamber-pot both broken; -nd the detendant. Mrs. Taylor, being obliged to employ a char. WOIIIIILU to (It, the work which the plaintiff had Contracted to do tor her. These articles broken constituted part of the plaintiff's de:naritl, but which the defendant's witnesses attempted to show '.ore broken when the defendant took possession. The letting was per week, at 12s. No erftlence was given of the value of the broken warts. case occupied an hour and a half. Verdict tot the plaintiff—lhunages 21. N.—Coats 40s. CCWENV. WILI.TAMS, GrNT. 31r. GiisELts: stated that this was an action by a tailor in I.E.:Idol 'Tains* an attorney in Wales for clothes: IL 12s. tid. was paid into Coon. Ttrailley is apprentice to Cowen—at the time the work -3 done for defendant hew= clerk to Cooper and Lowe of t:iian : : '....1an0--kcows the suit of mourning made for him when the Pri:ccss Charlotte died—on these occasions double wages are paid itint,eyMer. . .r.(41:11.0D, masten.taihr, proved that 31. 19s. is a moderate charge extra charge business done. attorney for the plaintiff; proved the defendant's et ioTty cowing to him, after bill tiled, ant offering to pay Id. 19s. :armed by post two letters, from defendant, which he r-nitue.A. also witness's &mod. to which tbei c z were received in . - ..1. 19s. demanded as balm - tee of account. `ls. AfillAliAll. for dzfendant, addressed the Jury, and called I . ..kett :taker, who proved several payments from toe defendant to th , plaintiff, and receipts given. 31r. elms. Black, attorney, is defendint's agent—waited on plaimirs attorney twice, and offered 11. ltts., not as admitting any debt, but to save litigation. lle would not accept it. MT. WILLIAMS, fox the plaintiff, replied. 31r. °ASSIZE also followed in reply. Tb....% bowo Curve ler, let having gummed up, The J•try found a verdict for the plaintiff, damages IL Ifs. dd.— Costs, fo.vvy Several otter cases we tried of no public interest. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. FRIDAY, FE1.13. Sittings np..r Tema, before Lord Od' Justire (hallow. SY StS:ti V. ant:Farr OF SURREY AND OTIIENA. This was a:1 action brought against the Shereei' of Surrey, for recompense for having levied upon the pods of the plaintiff. In consequence at which the pyaintiff had lost her business, she being a teeeher and seller of music. A great number of wine:meg was examined on die part of the plaintiff, whose taupe NM very strongly supported by Mr. Sergeant Vaughan Ile was oppcsctl by Mr. Sergeant Pell, for the defendants, who. in his altres to the Jury, directed their attention to the Manner in which plaiutiff's mother hail given her testimony, and particularly that pint where she stated her husband bad fiething to do with the taking of the house ; and when he (Seneerant Pell) had put a paper into her hand (which was an agree (: cat bets err the husband and the landlord), asking her if the Nig eeture was the handwriting of her husband, she had hesitated a deal before she could or would give an answer ; and she then t:i2. she coehl not say whether it was ,us writing or not, but at the mine time acknowl*ed having seen him write perhaps one hue ted times euring the period site bud been married (viz. twenty. (Ire years). And again, when he put another paper, bearing the eignature of her daughter, the plaintiff, into her hand, she said at firs: she did not believe it to be her daughter's writing ; and when be asked a second time, she immediately answered that she recol feted having seen her daughter write it. The Learned Sergeant hoped the Gentlemen of the Jury would think with bine that very little reliance ought to be placed on the evidence of this witness: he whited to ask the Jury whether they thought it probable. This witness had also stated that the house anti the property in it be longed to the plaintiff; and to prove the contrary of the first &Re plier. the defeeelant produced the agreement, which declared that the house was taken be the father of the plaintiff', and it was most likely that the property also was his. The plaintiff' had not even Celled her father into the box to give his testimony; and he (Ser geant Pell) would not give his opinion, but would leave the Jury to form their own ideas of it. He then proceeded to call the follow. lag IritnelSett Ann Carter keeps a stationer's shop in Burton -crescent; kw* Mr. and Mrs. Symes and daughter when they lived at Fir tree Cottage: they owed witness between three and tour pounds; asked ?/ainuff to speak to her father about it; plaintiff said elle was very she would pay it herself; had an ear-drop mended for Xi or e.tiff, it cost sixpence; she never paid witness; never asked her .or payment; has not been paid yet, but Yas given beret hint. Caner—The signature, as witness to the agreement, is my hand-writing. The agreement was here put in and read. It stated that G. R. Symes agreed to take the house in question, at a rent of 60L per annum. to the term of twenty-one years, free of all taxes. Rice knows plaintiff, and the house at Camberwell ; lived teeee himself; left last September twelve months; saw plaintiff' welt her father once; sold the fixtures in the house to her father, but when the father came to settle for them he had the receipts wntten out in his daughter's name; they came to about 601 tiyires was a stranger to witness before this occurrence; went into the house alter plaintiff was in it; it had the appearance of being a music-shop; does not know where the father lives: witness had no tease of the house, but referred the tither to Brown. Thomas Class is son of one the defendants, who is an auctioneer; assisted in removing the goods; they were taken to No. !0, Mich street, Bmough ; they were sold at their tale value; the whole sold Tor 901. 13a. l d. ; the music fetched 71. 3s. 6d. ; generally knocked down to the highest bidder, at a sheriff's sale; has assisted his fa. bier about three years. Lot 71 consisted of sundry pieces of music; elms was an error in the taking of the goods at first, but it was ex eilsineel at the time of the sale; it fetched about 21. Lot 72, the same error happened with this lot; music does not sell very well at an auction ; the lets were not knocked down in a hurry; thinks the , sale was most fairly conducted ; did not prepare the music part of the catalogue himself; compared the catalogue with the quantity of music after it was pnnted ; can't say what quantity was deff cited ; all the music taken front Camberwell was sold ; was present at the removal ; is quite sure it was all sold at this auction. Mr. Sergeant VAUaliAx replied At great length, and dwelt upon the aspersions thrown out by his Learned opponent against the elm. recur of the mother of the plaintiff; who is the wife of • gentleman who lied been an officer in his Majesty's service, and unfortu. randy had for some time been embarrassed in his circumstances, and whose daughter having had an education by which she had made bseself mistress of several accomplishments, and amongst them that of music, had endeavoured to support her father, mother, teed herself by teaching red belling music; in consequence of the proceeding resorted to by defendants, sue was now unable to con- Alma those exertions ; and it was for some recompense for the logs, that this action was resorted to. The Learned Sergeant then pro ceeded to direct the attention of the Jury to the evidence of the son of the auctioneer, and to his improper and irregular conduct with respect to the drawing up; of the catalogue—and that he did not call for unwarrantable damages, but merely for a fair indemnity for the property loot, and for a sufficient recompense for the conse quent injury the plaintiff' had received from the loss of this pro wety, whereby she was disubled front prosecuting her endeavours to obtain a respectable livelihood, and he (Sergeant Vaughan) con. ceived it would not be requesting too much were he to ask for grime remuneration for the aspersions thrown out against the plain. Oland her family. The Loan Ciller JUSTICE summed up the evidence, and called the observation of 1112 Joey to the main points adduced in the emerge of the investigation, and that the first point for their conviieration was, as to whose property this is, and it has been proved that she paid for some of it, and the roe was bought in her name, or whether they thought the property belonged to the fa ther, and that it was purchased by the daughter for the purpose of giving a colour to the affair, and for the security of the property born any of the father's creditors ; and if the Jury considered that the goods in question had cost the plaintiff the sum of 631. and were her property, of course they would give her a verdict to that amouut ; the goods had been taken in execution for a debt owing by the father, and it the e ir2 were of opinion, that sleay were as wally the property of th stiff, they (dm Jury) would give her the benefit of that opinion y returning a verdict in her favour. The Jury, after nonsulting a short time, requested leave to with draw, and after an absence of 23 minutes, they returned a verdict for the plaintiffe_Demages, 401. 7 f ~1 ~~ rL: DUCHY COURT OF LANCASTER, FRIDAY. Fi1.13. IUORT OF PUBLISHING THE PROCEEDINGS IN A THE KING V. WILLIAM CLEMENT. This is a proceeding by wa of petition, for the remission of a fine of 8001 . intr.:mai on the defendant, on the Vith of April, IWO, for •• unlawfully and contemptuously printing and publishing, in ths newspaper called the Observer, the trials of Arthur Thistle. wood and James Inge, for high treason, pending the proceedings against John Thomas Brunt and others, included in the same in. dictment, for the sante high treason, connury to the orders of the Csurt, and to the obstruction of public justice." The tine was nitrated into this Court by order of the Court of Exchequer, and vas levied by the Sheriff of Middlesex, by process under the seal of this Court, dated the 10th of June last. On the IPA Ja. nuary the defendant petitioned this Court for a remission of the line. It was ordered that the petition should be taken into consi- Aeration on the 30th of January, when, in consequence of the ab sence of Mr. ficarku, the Court adjourned until this day. At eleven o'clock Lord BEALL:v. the Chancellor of the Duchy, Sir. Justice BAYLEY, AM Mr. Justice HOLIWYD, the Judges now in the Commission for the county palatine of Lan. caster, and Mr. WLLTON, the Attorney-General of the Duchy, took their seats on the Bench. $ The ATTOINLY-ISENERAL, the SOLICTTOR-GENERAL, MT. 4 1 11111 IL E, King's Counsel for the county palatine, and Mr. LI T TL EDALt, appeareclon behalf of the Crown ; Mr.SCARLET T. the Co Knott SEIIGEANT, Mr. BILOUGHAM, and MT. PLATT, fin the Mr. Justice BATLEY-1 have not heard your other two propo sitions ; but as to those I have heard, if you mean to say that the foundation on which we are to hear your arguments is to be the face of the estrest, I must tell you that that foundation will not at all give a fair scope to the objectionson which you rely. Mr. SCARLETT—If your Lordship refers to the schedule of fines, you will find the matter set out more fully. Mr. Justice BATLEY having read it over, said, it did not even wpairfsma that deconeat hoeube defendant had been convictad. We might have been Indicted and tried by sjury secordlng to that the Learned Counsel termed the constitutional mode, fix aught that appeared on the face of that record. The ATTORNEYA/ENERAL said, that he was not desirous of throwing any obstacle in his Learned friend's way, and the best course he could suggest would be, to record a plea, and give the Crown an opportunity of traversing the facts, or of demurring to the arguments. Mr. Justice BATLEY—If I were inclined to have recourse to the argatnentssm at I,o»tiNitkl ' I should express my surprise at your passing over the Court of Exchequer, who have as yet given no opinion on the question, and preferring to appeal to the dud merit of his Honour, assisted by my brother Holroyd and myself, who have expressed our opinions before, when we were bound to do so in another case. It would he more satisfactory to all parties to put a plea on record. The ATTORWrir•GENENAL repeated, that he would raise TM obstruction to that course. It was desirable that an opportunity should be afforded of traversing the facts or demurring to the law on the other side, and then if either party was not satisfied, as it was a question of great importance, it might be carried by appeal to the Court of the last resort. Mr. SCARLETT said, his Learned friend the Attorney-General knew before that it was intended to apply to the Duchy Court for a :minion of the fine. The ATTORNET-GENERAL said, he understood that some ap lication was to be made, but of what nature be knew not. If be I had been aware that an appeal was intended, he would haveallowed the defendant to have pleaded to the estreat in the Court of Ex cheitner. Mr. SCAILETS said, that this Court had entertained applica tions to remit tines imposed by the Lord Chancellor. It had ad mitted the parties to plead, and on their plea had reversed the order. As to the last suggestion from the Bench, he would entirely waive the objection which his Lordship conceived likely to arise from the circumstance of the argument being heard before the same Court, which is exceedingly small and moon- Judges who had already given their opinion on the questiod. On d with *odium. attracted, we presume, by the the contrary, he should be better satisfied that the argument should of the argument expected to have been debated. be heard before their Lordships, as he knew that if it had weight Court was assembled, Mr. SCASILETT rose, and with them, any preconception in their minds would prove as light -h. He appeared , he said, on behalf of the pe- ass feather. bad been sated under a primate of the Court, Mr. Justice BATLEY—I am perfectly satisfied that the course 'which the Attorney-General suggests, to which, indeed, he lays he will lend his assistance, will be the most desirable for all panies. Mr. ScAutEvi—As an humble individual. perhaps your Lord ship will allow me to suggest, that there are two mcdes in which the levy may be made, either by extent or by process. If it »made by extent, the party may plead to it, and that would bring the question in a move convenient form before the Court. Thy ATTORNEY.GENERAL—Can an extent issue in this ease ? Mr. SCAIILETT—An extent may issue for any debt due to the Crown. _ . _ 31r. Weturow (the Attorney-General of the Duchy Court) stated, that by • statute of Henry VIII. this Court had the same power as the Court of Exchequer. He was apprehensive, that if the consideration of the question were refereed from Court to Court, the line would be utterly exhausted. Mr. Justice BAYLE'r suggested whether any harm could accrue from following this course: either to take the judgment of this Court on the argument, or to take it pro firma, and go at once to the House of Lords. . 3lr. SCARLET T said, if any difficulty should occur in setting aside the process in point of form, the appellant had a fair right to be heard on the merits. He should therefore prefer to plead there, and put the plea on record in that Court. The ATTORN ET-GENERAL said, it wan a matter of indif ference. It was competent for the defendant to have pleaded in the Court of Exchequer when the matter was there. Mr. Justice BAYLEY observed, that they might be met by this difficulty in the House of Lords. It might be said it was too late to plead after the case had passed the Court of Exchequer. Mr. ‘l'az.vost said, that in Ifigil there was a precedent of a motion, in which the question was the legality of a fine. The course would be for the appellant to file his exceptions before a given day. The words of the statute are, "by exception, plea, nr answer.' The Duchy Court proceeded par/ posse with the Court of Exchequer, and had the same power in all respects an to the business before it. The exceptions of the appellant must be sup- . ported by proper proof. lie would of course file only what was the real truth. The Attorney-fieneral could then demur, and judgment might be given on the demurrer. The Court of Ex chequer could do ncrmore,-and perhaps, if it went back there, that Court might refuse to hear the case again, as it had been before the Duchy Court of Lancaster. Mr. SCARLETT remarked, that it required some consideration to' know how to make an application to this Court. It was nut a matter of every day practice. The ATTOILYEY.-GENERAL said, it was possible the Court of Exchequer might object to take cognizance of the question. It' would, therefore, be much better to argue it in the Duchy Court, or to go at once to the Houle of Lords. Mr. SCARLETT aid, he would proceed to state leis third pro. , position, if the Court would allow him. The AvvortivET-Ox NE tut. said he had some doubt whether an appeal to the House of Lords would answer the purpose they had in view. if the appellant desired it, be, as the officer of the Crown, would do all in his power to facilitate the attainment of the discus sion in the Court of Exchequer; but he had some doubt whether that court would entertain it. IS petitioner. The body of the Ca t •miens, was filled wi 4; pest importance of th As son as the Coin addressed the Bench. I , widows, whose seeds 1 • for a fine imposed upon him by a Commission of Gaol Delivery. He confessed he Mt sonic embarrassment in proceeding with the argument, as he was aware that it might be urged against him that the petitioner, while the case was in the Court of Lxchequer, had taken no stet.* to put any objection to the fine on the record. The petitioner had been deceived by misinformation ; fur there could be no doubt that he would have been permitted to have recorded his objection in the Court of Exchequer. This appeal, however, placed the Duchy Court in the same situation as the Court of Exchequer, if the petitioner had pleaded in that Court. The fine having been imposed at a Communion of Gaol Delivery, was returned into the Exchequer, and having been there recorded, was transmitted to this Court, from whence process had issued to levy execution for the fine. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—The King must have applied to the Court before the process was issued. Mr. SCARLETT contended that the petitioner had a right to ays pear before this Court, because the execution under which his goods were taken was not issued by the Court of Exchequer, but from this Court. The execution stated the subject matter on which the question arose. It recited the particular grounds on which the fine was imposed, and therefore the Court was in full possession of the whole case. The process directed the Sheriff of Middlesex to levy the fine of 5001. "on the goods and chattels of Inr.ell Clement, of the Strand, for unlawfully and con temptuously printing and publishing, in the newspaper called the Msercrr, the trials of Arthur Thistlewood and James lags, pend ing the trials of John Thomas Brunt and others included in the same indictment, for the same high-treason, contrary to the orders of the Court and to the obstruction of public justice, of which he is convicted." Now, the objection to the process arose on the very face of the order, and it was undoubtedly competent to every Court out of which &process was issued to set it aside, if any defect or ille gality were *hewn upon the very face of it. (In the same pound also any individual might maintain an action against the Sheriff if he contended that the Court from which the execution was issued had no jurisdiction, or was not warranted to proceed in that course upon that particular occasion. The petitioner had his choice of these proceedings, and lie had preferred to come before the Court, and move that the process should be set aside, on the ground that it hail been improvidently issued, and that it was on the face of it ir regular and illegal. 'there could be no doubt, he apprehended, as to the power of the Court to entertain a motion of mamma vies,,, ice the Court of Exchequer. He took it for granted that nothing could be more clear, than that where process was wrongfully issued by any Court, it was competent to grant a writ of ettooreas moans : and that fur that purpose, the party against whom the process was issued was entitled to go into the merits of the case, to shew the grounds on which he moved foe the superseding of the process, Assuming that this position was unquestionable, he would at once proceed to open the general question in this cue. This was a .me imposed for a contempt, without the intervention of any form of trial, or process of adjudication or any constitutional mode of procedure by which the defendant could be heard in his de fence; and he (Mr. Scarlet) was sure that he might say in that Court, and before the learned persona lie was then addressing, that the first disposition ererry Judge would feel on the statement of the case, would be a disposition hostile to the proceeding. Cues, in which the sulijects of a free country were liable to summary pro cess. either of tine or imprisonment without trial, were eases of ex reption, and not according to the general law of the land; and, therefore, the oohs probandi was cast on the shoulders of those who supporta! these cases of exception. It was for them to prove that these cases of exception had some foundation iii the known and recognised law of the land, and that there was either some statute or inveterate usage that clear y justified a resort to these harsh and extraordinary measures. Nay, even if an inveterate usage could be shown, yet if it were founded on an unjust assumption or ex. ercise of power—if it were not analogous to the spirit of the Con stitution—if it militated against the Statutes passed to protect and secure the liberty of the subject, the onus pruboadi would still rest on the shoulders of those who supported these cams of exception. It was well known that many usages, now justly abolished, were at one time generally, and it was therefore considered legally prac tised. lle alluded particularly to the custom of fining jurors, when they would not give such verdicts as the Court directed them to return and of fining grand juries for not finding bills. At one period this custom was so firmly established that it was common for Judges to report their own proceedings under it in the Courts to which they belonged; and Lord Hale stated expressly that there were cases in which it might be done, though he doubt ed the general legality of the practice. Such was the confirmed tyranny of those times, that though Sir Thomas Smith, in his book, stated that the practice was against the common law of the land and the statutes relating to the subject, and though that book was a current lesson for the Judges of the day, yet in conse quence of one proceeding which bad been silently introduced, and followed by those whose purposes were answered by availing them. selves of it as a precedent, so great was the multiplicity of prece dents to be quoted in favour of the practice, that some of the Judges affected to consider it as an established rnatterof law, which they could not do otherwise than follow. This example,shewed the great importance of resisting unlawful practices in their very beginning. And as lie (Mr. Scarleu) hoped to satisfy the Court that day, that the fine on Mr. Clement was the first trample in which such a power had been exercised, and that it bore no analogy to the cases to which it had been likened; he looked forward with confidence to the result, convinced that the Court would treat this as a case of exception, which required strong, clear, and decisive authority, io principle, to support it. In order to make his argo. ment more explicit and perspicuous, he had reduced to writing four propositions on which be relied for success; and if the Court thought them just, or an one of them just, he that the comemisnos mast for that the fine was His first proposition was,— " 1. That a Court of gaol delivery has no power to issue a writ of attachment. The second proposition was,— " 2. That the power to punish for a contempt committed wholly out of the viewof the Court, by one who owes no suit to the Court, and is boutiby nu o ffi cial duty to attend the Court, is derived out of, and d epend s upon the power of issuing a writ of attachment." He wo und qualify this proposition by introducing the vote, " in a summary way," so that it should be " the power to punish in a summary way," of which he predicated the mode of its origin. Mr. Justice Bstriev.—You must necessarily supply us with a copy of the estreat, as that is the foundation of your argument. There being no copy in Court, the original record was handed to his Lordship. Mr. ScsaLtry suggested that the affidavit in support of the petition contained a copy of the whole proceeeings on the case. Mr. Justice BATLEY.—The way in which you get rid of the preliminary point is, by saying that the subject matter of your ob jection appears on the face of the estreat. On examining it I find that your proposition goes much further than the meat winikl warrant. Mr. SCAR LETT—SUppOIIIC for a moment that it dom. Mr. Janice BAYLEY—In the first place, it does not appear by the estreat whether this contempt was committed wholly out of the view of the Court, nor that the petitioner owed no salt to the Court, nor that he was bound by no official duty to attend the Court, nor whether this Court ever issued a writ of attach ment. Mr. SCARLETY contended, that all that was necessary to give the Court jurisdiction in this case was, that it should ap pear on the face of the process of execution a statement of the grounds on which the levy was to be made. The petitioner had brought the whole matter before the Duchy Court in his affidavit es fully as if he had originally litigated the question in the Exche quer. In the case of an ordinary estreat, if the defendant missal the exact time to plead, the Court would, on affidavit of the cir cumstances, indulge him with an opportunity of putting his plea on record. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Perhaps the Court would allow him to do so, and if you now have a mind to go into the Exchequer and put your plea on record there. it will give both the Crown and yourself an opportunity of having it discussed as a perfectly new question, and ultimately, if you please, of obtaining the judgment of the highest Court in the kingdom. Mr. SCAR LETT—Suppose the Court should object to the estreat, provided I can satisfy your Lordships that my general objection is good, the question can be settled here • but if it should appear doubtful to the Court, I hope your Isord'ahips would allow either party to have the beuefit of a more solemn judgment in the other Court. POLICE. now- ST REET. Yesterday William Davit, a respectably dressed person, was put to the bar, charged with robbing Oliver Lloyd, Esq. a solicitor, residing in Cliford's Inn, of a valuable silver watch. Mr. Lloyd stated that last night, as he was coming out of the pit of Covent-garden Theatre, the prisoner pulled at his watch, and had it not been secured by a guard-chain, he would have suc ceeded in his object. The prisoner, by the advice of his solicitor, Mr. liumphries, declined saying anything at present. Fuliy committed. lIATTON-GARDEN. Yesterday John Sntini, re:iding Wart (ford street, Somers Town, appeared to a summons issued on information charging him with privately sending out of his house four parcels of scaleboard, used in the manufacture of band-boxes, &c. the same not being duly weighed, measured, and stamped according to the statute of Gco. s. 11. John lair, excise-officer, deposed that the definulant is a menu ' facturer of aealeboard, and that it is his duty to see the same pro perly stamped; but, on passing accidentally through the defend ant's street on the 10th of January last, he saw four parcels put into a cart, under suspicious circumstances, and, un following it, discovered them to contain unstamped scaleboard. The penalty, in such cases, is two hundred pounds, but a power of mitigation being vested in the 31ogistrates to the extent of one. fourth, the defendant was convicted in fifty pounds, and a warrant of distress immediately issued on the same. A respectable-looking young man, in the employment of Mr. Duncan, fancy fringe and trimming maker, St. Martin's-court, St. Martin's-lane, was brought up under the following circum stances It appeared that on the preceding evening, about half-past six, a gentleman knocked at the dour of 3lr. Williams, tailor, in De vonshire-street, Queen-sitare, IlloomsbOry. and stated that a thief had just entered the parlour window, and immediately on this alarm, • young man jumed out through the window, and ran elf. The cry of " Stop thie f!" being raised. a baker pursued, and stopped the prisoner at the corner of a street. The hakes , persisted in swearing that this was the individual who escaped, though the servant of the house deposed that his dress was altogether different. His master, with whom he has lived for eleven years, as also many respectable persons, attended to speak to the prisoner's ge neral good character. The Magistrate, without hesitation, discharged him, assuring him that there was not the slightest imputation against him, not. withstanding the positive manner in which the baker persisted in his error. ALLEGED MURDER. A Coroner's Jury was impanelled last evening, at seven o'clock, before Thomas Shelton, Esq. Coroner; in the Board-room, St. Bar tholonew's Hospital, to inquire how, and by what means, Sarah Lawrence, aged A, can.e to her death. Edward Ryan, sworn —I live at No. 1, Saffron-hill, and am a pensioner. I was sitting in my room, about eleven o'clock, on Sa turday week last, and I heard a great noise in the deceased's apart. ment, which was opposite to mine, on the third floor. It appeared that there was a quarrel between the deceased and her paramour (George Gouldsbury); they lived together. Many words between them ; and I then heard a great noise, as if a tab i r had been thrown over ; and, next, a report of a great quantity of earth enware breaking : immediately after this, Gouldsbury ran into my room, almost in a state of nudity ;he exclaimed, Lawrence has thrown a pot of water over nit in bed," and he came in foe protection : soon after Lawrence followed him, bleeding, and, with dreadful imprecations, bade him come out of my room. John Riley, who was sleeping in my room at the time, told them both to go out, and not disturb his wife, who had long been ill, and was then in a thing state. Lawrence exclaimed. " D—n you and your wife," and immediately took a plate, and threw it with great violence at Riley. Riley then got out of bed, and put her out of the room, in doing which she tore his shirt to pieces, and likewise his night-cap. I saw no more, till she brought two watchmen up stairs, about ten minutes after, and gave Gouldsbury and Riley into custody. The watchmen would not take the charge, but fetched two night constables, who took both into custody, and conveyed them to the watch-house, where the constable of the night refused to detain them, and they were, in consequence, sent back. Law rence had much blood on her face and arms when she first emend the room. ColioNE a—When did you see the blood on her face ? Witness.—l think I first saw the blood on her face when she brotisht the watchmen. mums continued.—Go.. back for the night. Juror.—What was the charge to the watchmen against the men ? Witness.—She charged than with beating her, and throwing a pint of beer over her. By the Conowza.—Riley did not strike her, in putting her out of the room. Mary Ryan sworn-1 am wife of E. Ryan, the last witness. On Saturday week, I was in my apartment, cooking some meat for supper; I heard a table fall in Gotiklsbury's room, and directly after, I heard some earthenware break, which I have ascertained to be the chamber utensil; alter this, Gouldsbury rushed into my room, and kept the door, endeavouring to keep Lawrence out, but she thrust herself in, and John Riley desired them to go out ; she would not, and went up by the aide of Gouldsbury, and said, " Out of this place you coma, or I'll die by yon." Riley then said, if she did not go out, ha would kick her out, on which she taught 1 .- up a plate and threw it at him. Riley then got up, and by main force put her out, in which he got his shirt torn; his wife at this time was lying almost expiring in bed ; Lawrence's face bled profindy when she first entered the room ; she then went out, and brought two watchmen, and charged George Gouldsbury with breaking the chamber utensil on her head, and John Riley with pulling leer heir. Two night constables came, and Gouldsbury and Ran wen taken to the watchhouse. By the Cononza—When Lavrrenee fint entered, after Goulds bury, she said, "Oh Ryan ! I have received my death-blow from I the chamber utensil :" this was in Gouldsbury's presence ; he said, " you should not get tipsy, by drinking so much gin ; for you have now fallen over the earthenware and cut your head." William Watson sworn—l live a: No. 8, Bowling-green-hem, Clerkenwell. I sin the watchman on the spot (Saffron-hill). On Saturday week, between 11 and 12 o'clock in the night, Sarah Lawrence came dowff to me, and said she wanted my assistance; Isbe was deluged in blood, and had a cut on her forehead, near an inch long. I went up stairs with her to the third floor, accom panied by my brother watchman ; Riley and Ryan lived in one TOM, Gouldsbury and Lawrence in the dther ; Gouldsbury une thee ; Lawrence pointed to him, and said, " that is the min sob inflicted the wound on my head, and Riley is as much in fault; give you charge of both.' Gouldsbury was lame, and said be could not go ; I then went for the o ffi cer of the night, who came deem, and they were both taken to the watchhouse, but were shonewirde discharged by the o ffi cer of the night. Coroner—Why did he discharge them ? Witness--Lawrence taultered in the detail of her story. Juror—Was the wound evident, and did she there say Goulds bury had inflicted it? Witness—She did ; she was the worse for liquor, but sensible; she hung about till near three o'clock in the morning, and all this time the wound in the head kept bleeding. Gouldsbury said at the watchhouse, she fell over the utensil; but she denied it, and said he flung it at her. John Howes sworn—l am a fellow-watchman to the last witness, and went to the room with him ; Lawrence took me to liouldsbury„ land said, " that is the man who cut me on the bead with the utensil;' he denied it; the wound was then bleeding profusely ; she attempted to strike (louldsbury, but I took hold of her, and would not let her; she also said Riley had struck her, and gave charge of both ; Lawrence was in liquor, but quite sensible of what she said. Mr. John Allport, house-surgeon of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, sworn.—The deceased was brought to the Hospital last Sunday week, in the morning. I examined her. She had a severe cut on the temple, extending to the bone, about an inch lung, in which was a small piece of - earthenware. I dressed the wound, and sent her home with the directions I thought proper. She came in again on the Thursday morning following, with the lips . of the wound inflamed, and the eye-lids both swollen, with an ensyrelas spread over the face. She became delirious, and, in spite of every effort that medical skill could devise, she died on Tuesday morning last, at six o'clock. The erisypelas was the consequence of the wound of which she died. COILONZI—A person drinking much, receiving a wound in the head, would be more likely to suffer? Witness—Certainly, a persou of free habits, particularly in spirit drinking. By the Jurors—She said her husband gave the wound- Coetowz a—Did you conceive she was dying at the th e,she made that assertion Witness—Oh, no! certainly not. The Coaowza, in his address to the Jury, said that Riley was present; but as he might, in sonic degree, become implicated, it would be improper to examine him, moreover as he was likely to say everything to exculpate himself. The assertions were to be taken, with the replies to them. If the Jury thought her assertion in pointing out the man as the perpetrator of the act credible, it amounted to the crime of manslaughter, as there had been a pre vious scuffle; but if the Jury believed she fell over the utensil, then it was accidental death. If a man went, coolly and delibe rately, and murdered another, he would then have to answer for the crime. It was. however, for the Jury to say whether they would find a verdict of murder, manslaughter, or accidental death. The Jury, without hesitation, returned a verdict of "Man slaughter against George Gouldsbury." At the return of the verdict, the accused begged the Coroner and Jury to hear him for a few minutes. before they affixed their signa tures to the deposition. He was an Englishman, he said, labour ing under great reverse of fortune, although he might have been supposed to come from the sister kingdom, by his place of residence. Adversity had driven hint to 'seek shelter in so humble an abode ; and although he had degenerated in forming a connexion with the deceased, it was the least of his thoughts to have committed any personal violence to destroy her life. The fact was, that she threw the water over hint when in bed, on which lie certainly got out and pushed her, when she fell over the utensil in question that had proved so fatal to her. The origin of the affray was that which was to many others, as it had been to him, a bane of lasting discord: Lawrence was unfortunately extremely jealous, and this, he had no Now that the Lottery system is drawing to a conclusion, doubt, had prompted her, though without cause, to the commission it must be a subject of proud exultation for Mr. SIVEWKIGHT of that violence which bad been the cause of their quarrel. H. that he took the hat Contract, and by garnishing his Scheme with trusted the Jury would view his situation as a haul one, • Seven 211,0001. Prizes, has succeeded m rivetting the attention of under the rheumatic gout as he did, and let their feelings sway wi the Public, in a most unusual degree. Next Thursday, Fe- the urgency of the case. bruary 19, will be the First Day of Drawing, and a memorable The CORONER said he had violated the law even in pushing day it will probably prove to many, for the Two First Prizes are her, as that led to deprive her of life. The verdict, therefore, could each to have 20,0001. c.rtra ; and all that are drawn Blanks will be not be disturbed. pm In the Wheel and drawn again, so that if they miss the Two! The Coroner's warrant was then issued ; whereupon the diefin. Printed at THE BRITISH PRESS Office, by J. W. First, they will still have a chance for Five other Prizes of 20,0001. quent was taken hito custody, and fully committed to Newgate . 181, Strand; and Published by R. CANNON, OW After a few — words of conversation, between the bench and the ba.• Scant.tr T proceeded to state his third and fourth propo sitions. " 3. That an order not to rublish a trial while it was pending was art order on all the King s subjects, amounting to a law, which the Court had no jurisdiction to make. " 4. That if the order could be considered as made for that particular nisi, and obedience to it exacted as to an order in the cause, it should have been made in writing, and ought to have been served on the party before he could be punished for a contempt in disobeying it. The Learned Gentleman said he had reduced these propositions to writing, because it would be found more convenient in the pro gress of the discussion. Mr. Justice BAY LE Y—Vour last proposition seems rather a sin gular one. You appear to agree that it is an order on all the King's subjects, but you say unless it is personally served on them all it is of no validity. Mr. SCAR LETT—M7 propositions, my Lord, are to this effect : —I say the orders are either general rules, which nobody is liable to a contempt for disobeying, or particular regulations, which can ' only become valid on personal service. The COMMON SERGEANT—It may be, my Lord, that some others of us may have sonic other propositions to urge. (A laugh.) Mr. SCARLETT—I know that, as to subjects which are not of a technical nature, Judges of course will feel and judge like other men. I shall, therefore, not argue the policy or impropriety of the orders which Mr. Clement infringed. I may assume that the Court eo.is:ders them impolitic and improper, but I will not express my owi, sentiments on the subject. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—As you are so far agreed, had you not better prepare a plea, and submit it to the Attorney. General ? Mr. SCAR LETT Said he would take advantage of an early day for thatpurrose. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—NO doubt, if you hand it over to him, he will communicate to you any difficulty he may feel, and by con ference and mutual agreement you will succeed in bringing the question fairly before the Court. As your object is to raise the ge neral question, you will not plead any dis putable _ fact. Mr. SCARLETT--I know of but one fact likely to be disputed ; whether the order made by the Lord Chief Justice was reduced to writing till after the gaol delivery ? The ATTORNEYAILWERAL—PIeh7F that fact may be 10 stretched as to accommodate us. (A lau .) Mr. Justice lLiri.uw—Your object, Ir. Saudett, Is to raise the gell7question ? 1 8CARLET will Tale any question that may be fbr the benefit of my client ; but the general question is by far the most important we consider. Mr. Justice Baxter—Yon ought to be confined to that, be esuse the Atlneney.General has estsceded a great deal to enable you to argue it. Mr. Justice Hor.aom—There will be no difficulty in framing the record so as to meet the general question without touching any fact that may be traversed. Mr. Justice BAYLEY remarked, that in the Court of King's Bench the affidavits had stated a great many immaterial facts. A question was raised, whether Mr. Clement was out of town bona ilde, or to avoid the service of the rule. Mr. Bnoucurix—His being out of town was not denied. Mr. SCAOLETT-1 believe it appears by the publication itself that the Lord Chief Justice did make such an order. We cannot deny that we were aware of the prohibition. Souse conversation then took place as to some immaterial points that were argued in the King's Bench. Mr. SCARLET T said his argument would be that the Court had no right of jurisdiction over the petitioner. He would rather that the great questkn should be raised than that the cap should go off on any_point. Mr. BROUGHAM remarked, that the affidavit stated that the order was not in writing. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—That is really a bye point. If it was de- livered orally it would be taken down in writing immediately. Mr. Justice HOLROYD—A Judge's orders are frequently parole. Mr. SCARLETT—And I will not deny that a person may be law. fully committed for disobeying them. The Court and Counsel, then consulted as to a convenient day to which to adjourn the proceedings in this appeal. It was busily agreed to adjourn the Court conditionally to two days before the neat term (Monday, May S.) The Court then proceeded with some business of no public im. penance, after which it adjourned. went away, and did not come PALACE COURT, FRIDAY, FEL 13. HOWARD V. WILKINS. Mr. Tnessiorit said this wit an action brought by the plain- SC a boot and shoe maker, at St. Catherine's, to recover a sum of 1 21. His., the price of a pair of boots, delivered under the following 1 circumstances :—ln November, 1819, the plaintiff went to the King of Prussia public-house, in his neighbourhood, where he saw the defendant and the celebrated pugilist Philip Sampson, denominated , Brummagem in the prise-nog. The defendant told Howard to , make Sampson a pair of top-boots and he would pay for them ; they were made and carried to the King of Prussia, where Sampson receives! them, and Wilkins, addressing him, said, " Now, Samp son, you give the fellow a good lathering, and you shall have the boots for your trouble,7 alluding to a tight which was to take , place. On the . plaintiff asking the defendant for the money, lie refused to pay it, alleging that he had never ordered the boots. Sampson hsd been brought down from Birmingham to give evi dence; but as be (Mr. Thessiger) had not seen Sampson, be could sot idle priori what evidence be could give ; but he had no doubt that, when he came to the scratch, he would deal fairly with the rms. The burned Counsel called two witnessed, who were present when the defindant ordered !behests foe Sanspres : s'hilip Sampson stated, that in consequence of his having fought Joshua Hudson, the defendant, who was in that affair stake-hWer, made him a present of a pair of boots, which were furnished by the plaintiff. Cross-examined by Mr. MANGLES.--HC had then only acquired a little celebrity as a pugiliat. He had lived as a butcher with the defendant. Ile had understood that a subscripnon was made for him in consequence of his bravery in the battle, which the defen. dant had not paid over to him. He did not remember that the Iplaintiff hail ever applied to him facet:. price of the boots. Mr. MANGLES—DO you recollect M'Laren, a tailor ? Sampson—Yes. Mr. 81 aufixes.--Did you ever pay for the breeches he made for you ? Sampson—You have no right, I think, to ask that question.— (A laugh.) Mr. kliotonrs—You are a very brave fellow, I have no doubt, but you look very sulky. Sampson--You have no business to call my " profession" into question. Mr. :Haunt re—Were you ever asked in M`Larcier presence by the plaintiff for the money. Sampson-11 told you before, Ido not think I ever was asked for the money. Alr. blawoLea, for the defendant, called several witnesses, who swore that the plaintiff had asked Sampson for the money several times, and that Sampson had promised to pay it. g hee Jury, Jury, however, returned a verdict for the plaintiff for 21. 1 ALIRKETS CORN EXCHANGE. FRIDAY, FEBRUARY It. Them have arrived this week 3.50 if sacks of Flour,B,lkoo quarters of Wheat, 8,400 quarter•, of Barley, and 17,500 quarters of Oats. We had but few buy:l-s of Wheat to-day ; and, to facilitate sales, a reduction of full 2s. per quarter from Monday was submitted to. Barley was likewise very heavy sale, and must be noted 2a. per quarter lower than on Monday. There was a trifling demand fur Oats, at is. to 2s. per quarter under Monday's nominal currency. Beans and Peas were each Is. to 2s. per quarter lower, with but little inquiry. UXBRIDGE. Corn Inspector's Return, Fre. 12. Wheat, per load . . • - 131 Os to 191 lOs Barley, per quarter - Oats Beans Peas Rye - 11 24 to 11 10s - 11 1113 to 21 4. - 1/1L to 21 h - Ol Os to 21 Si NEWBURY. Wlieat - . 486 to Via Rye - —4 to —a Barley ** - - 256 to 346 Baal, per gallon BERKB. Fin. 12. als to 30s Beans . .34 to 424 Peas . lib to 48s 1, Is 6id to Is -tip IVheat - Barley SALISBURY, FEB. 10. 52s ed to —s Od Oats -18 s Od t o 2f 4 01 I - 26 s Ott to 35s ed Beans -34 s Ott to 44 0.1 Wheat Barley WAR3IINBTER, EEL 7. . 46a to 743 Oats I - 26. to 40s Beans - Wheat Barley - 24 to Vis 42s to no HUNGERFORD, Fs& 11. .SOi fki to 74s Od I Oats . 195 Od to 3.'s Od - 23 s Od to 354 •d Beans . 34s Od to 4:is ad DEVIZES, FEB. 12. Wheat and Beans at per sack ; Barley and Oats per quarter. Wheat -24 s Ikl to 3es Od j Oats . 225 Od to 28 s Od Barley . 304 lid to 89s Od Beans - IOs Od to 235 Od PRICE OF BREAD. The highest Price of Bread in the Metropolis is lid. for the font. pound Loaf. There are others who sell from a halfpenny to three halfpence below that rate. fo Od to So 8d 3. Od to Os 041 SMITHFIELD, FEB. 13. Beef - 3. rod to 48 Gd I Veal . Mutton - 34 4d to 44 8d 1 Pork . HEAD OF CATTLE THIS DAY Beast, 40S—Sh H A oep, 410—Cald4 130--Pigs, 110. VMARKET. 4! lie Od to it 1. 1011 61 IN W to 61 ROd 21 Os Od to 21 &0.1 Hay ('lover . Straw - NEWGATE ANb LEADENHALL—(By tbe, _Canis*, Beef - 2s dd to 3s lid I Veal id to Mutton - 21 8d to ds Od Pork - 2s 8d to 3s 6d PRICES OF HA' ST. JAMES'S. Hay - liBs Od to 126 s Od Clover -90 s Od to 124 Od Straw - 3trs Od to bla Od Y AND STRAW. WILITECIEAPIL. Hay -9t. Yd to 110 s Od Clover - 1016 Od to 130 s Od Saw 44. ad to 174 trd 11 1 , per Cwt. PRICE OF HO: POCKETS. LI. IS. BAGS. Kent - --- 01 101 to 121 0s East Kent and Canter- Kent - -- 0104 to 101 Os Some: . 71 11), a 91 Os Essex . 71 les to 101 Os bary . 01 Os to 171 Os Sussex - 81 Os to MI Os Essex - a, to 111 Its Farnham, fine, Hit Os to 211 111 Os to 161 O. PRICE OF POTATOES, _per Too. Ware - 21 lOs to 31 Os I York KitTneys 31 3s to 31 lOs Marsh Chsmps. 31 lOs to 01 Os j Scotch Reds 31 Os to 36 as PRICE OF RAW FAT, per Stowed Ph. Price by Tallow (as stated by the Taller Metiers), 2s I PRICE OF TALLOW, SOAP. /cc. pa /Mb. Town Tallow - 395 Od Yellow Stop • 70s N Yellow Russia . 365 Od Mottled - . 71. N White ditto -33 s 6d Curd . • - N Soap ditto . 32s fid Graves les Ott Melting Stuff - 29. Od Good Dregs - • Is N Ditto Rough -16 s Od PRICE OF CANDLES—TaIIow Chandlers' HalL Prim of Candles, per dozen, r 4. Od.—Moulds, 101. Od. Sixpence per dozen allowed for ready money. N.13--The prices in the general retail shops arc from 7d. to Id. er pound. SHEEP SKINS. Downs, 3s Ad to is Yd— Polled, 4 Ad to Ss id RAW IIDES. Best Heifers and Steers, --- - - 011 Od to 11 a per stone . 3s IM to 3s 2d Market Calf (each) Middlings -2s 8d to 2s 10d Butt; 50 to 66114 PRICE OF LEATHER j lb. . Ai Mutt 08 to 110114 - . to -.4 . Dressiog Hides . - • to 1901 Fioe Comela Hides - . .IN to 21 11 Crop Hides , for Cut ting,. LI to 40114 -Into 1 Illd 21 Light Ditto, 45 to 61.01bs Calf Skins, 36 to Abe Ditto, 60 to 701ba . Ditto, 70 to &Abe Small Seals (Greenland) - Large Ditto - - Tanned Horse Hides - Spanish Hone Hides - _ to . lid so OM - Odd to 27d - to Sid . ISO to lid to lid . 14d so lid - la so ISt COAL MA] 7, FEL Shi at Market. Ships sold. hies I ps Cannell Coal . 1 - - --• Od to 411 N. 2 Scotch Coal . . 1 . - —• Sd to 3 id. 1 28 Sunderland . . - - all Od to 41. N. 1 1/3i Newcastle . - 4* - - 311 Od to Ms id. (From the London Nes Price Currest.J COTTON—The Cotton market has amend a more decided aof improvement this week; eery little, except the dear O a f ib t i l e the last East India sale, is now to be had without an el. since. The sales amount to about LAO halos; via $5O Bent* 56d. middling, to bid. fair; 6d. to 60. for good fair se gee/ NO Surat' 61d. ordinary sid. fair, 6(d . good fair, 741. hot god: 150 Madras, frld. good fair, all in bond. And ditty paid, 10 Pn. name I lid. SI:GAIL—The Sugar market, during the present week, ire been heavy. There was a little more business doing yesterday, and the prices were a shade higher. Sugars, sultabb far the pans, continue scarce. Vrhen the market dosed to.day an admen of Is. per cwt during the week had been realised. The Refinelaareht* has lately assumed a firm appearance ; there has been Imre load. nee doing, and the holders evince no disposition to form salsa iv several instances this week prices Is. higher have been obtelbid. Foreign Sugars continue to be inquired after. COFFEE—There have been only three public sake Inessin forward this week, and, though the market has been heavy, no tris„ terial alteration in the prices can be stated; if avannah 67ca I 5d. 1 the Jamaica and Demerara went off heavily, aearly nip previous currency. By public sale on Wednesday, 311 e Cheribon, pale fair quality 66. . a 63e. 6d. By public sale t; s forenoon, 360 bags St. Domingo Coffee, fair qualitY, 0111. Ids a 695. fit. • RUM, BRANDY, and HOLLANDS.—The Rum market has become exceedingly heavy ; proofs are nominally Is. &1., ha it would be difficult to sell a large parcel at that rate ; the last ask was 2UO puncheons, proofs at Is. Bd. Brandy is also very, be. and there are sellers at Is. free on board to arrive . Geneva se M out variation. FRUlT.—Denies in baskets continue in demand, and would meet a ready sale at the quotations; in the other desaipdoes di n aris very little variation. Yesterday a public sale was attempt. Flat Tinker Pigs, in drains, quarter and half chests, wens booms in at Ads.; Pulled ditto, in dmma, the greater part bought is hen 475. to Ms. (By private contract 1,000 drums Pulled were 'add 43a. per cwt., and nearly the whole of the French Fruit woo takes out; in Currants there is very little doing, the aide& lately fee exceeding the demand. PIAIENTO..—By public sale yesterday, 9117 bass PPM* er• Jittery lid. a Bid. ; one lot 9d. TALLOW.—The Tallow market remains in a vary state ; the price of yellow candle Tallow all the week Us: relied BIRTHS. On Tuesday last, at Belton House, Lincolnshire, the Eoun:ers Brownlow of a daughter. Oa the 3d inst., at Oreensted Hall, the lady of Major Robe H. Ord, K. H., of a son. On Tuesday last, at Boughton Hall, Lincolnshire, the hay 0! Henry Dymoke, Esq. of a son and MARRIED. At Greenwich, on the 12th inst., Joseph Robertson, Esq. d Whitby,Yorkshire, to Ann, youngest daughter of Cieorgent os ". Esq., of (;room's HilL DIED. In the Tower, on the 11th inst. Edmond Donnellan, Esq• Dais d the Stork Exchange, aged 38. On the 10th inst. 31r.Wm. Fenian" of Burr-street, in the year of his age. At Bombay, on the .12d of August, John Hector Jonoh second son of Lieut.-General Sir Hector Jones, K.C.8., year of his age. On Sunday last, at Blesworth, Northamptonshire,. E l i 2lel/1 ' I wife of Henry Frederic Alston, Esq. At Brighton, on Tuesday last, George Roebuck, Esq. of In s i di. place, Fiteroy-square. On Tuesday last, at Cadogan-place, in the 36th year of her ail Jane, the wife of Alfred Thrale Perkins, Esq. On the 11th host., at Walton, the Lady Harriet daughter of the Earl of Tankerville. On Wednesday, at his house in Queen -square, in his 74 Richard Chcslyn Cresawell, Esq. Proctor, Doctors' Comnt one of the Deputy Registrars of the Prerogative Coot of bury. to —al 1 to Did 381 to 21 174 to 1 it 1114 to 214 lid to 3M 11Ati to 27d 11.1 to 161 1 to 114 lid 3o to IM 144 to 161 144 to 134 • h Puke I to GS N. to $5. id. • I to us to 331 yd. lx f. J s OWE decided except the deo without sod 1 ' is. PS Berle xi fa se ped. ' Vii,fit ea; *b Sle ry• tht not week, ire stio ass yesterday, for Ile for the ye% 41.11 2 admen of le. tel Refixed enreket the ten muse had. lull form Bulb is A t be ta ohmissd. die lest e salts loosed heavy, ne S 87s.s "AL t • —; su ay, 5p r ll uafie e public sale tls IEII4, es Ile • Rum wad mu ls. ad, bet t Q. ; the last mie • , deo very homy, Geneva a'ith. • owd, and Todd tampions that . was attempted. as wens bought D. b; it ight Aim led vete sad* MusFrui h t was IMAY fit JAM p Piss* le• mire d the coun:es Ne r Major Robe hire, the Ind) of , b I ' ' - bertooa, Ent. d ' - ' George Drowse , wk •, a, nap, FA. kill d t114.hl .4. 4 in the 4'4 1 e, .ctor jOll6. Au in the shirt, ElLle eth ' avi of Russell. : t it year of her age , . 4 Benue, roe Also , in his PO Y t n rq ▪ Commas. 111 Coutt of Caste. ra2lMarle gt ! 4io Gear , [ t at=. • • .. . 1