The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-05-31 00:00:00

~ g: ~~ E _~f Mr. _ aft wes, of opinion . Public Works was legitimate mode of speeding the public money. , Mr. C. lIUTCHINSON concurred in the opinion. that public works were a useful mode of employing the public money ; and its emokyneent in that way contributed greatly to preserve quiet, by_ givTfie benetclal 'occupation to the people. Mr. 11U3IE was oppoita to the principle of employing the public money, merit, .for the purpose of employing people. It throwiog k swat to dispose of it in such a way. Mr. GOULBURN said that the money than voted was not ap propriated merely to the construction of works foe the employment of the people, but fcr the construction of works of permanent utility, which, whether the people were or were not in a state of distress, It would be proper and beneficial to prosecute. (Hear.) Mr. Perm and Mr. Hone mutually explained. . • • The vote was then agreed to. The House resumed, and the Report was ordered to be teogeht wp to-morrow. THE ROYAL 111E‘ , SAGE. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the 'banging up of the Repose on the Resolutions relative to the Royal Message Rif making suitable provision for her Royal Highness Principe Alexandrine Victoria (daughter of his Royal Highness the Duke at Kent), and Geroge Frederick *leeender knits( Appeal (aso of his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland). ' • Sir A WROTTESLEY was desirous of taking this opychedt, of correcting a mistake which occurred respecting him as M speech attributed to him in the newspapers. The speech wee ollie pronounced. he believed, by an Hon. Baronet, a Member for ,roue part cf Scotland, and wes spoken when he (Sir J. iVrottesley) not even present in the Douse. (Hear, and a laugh.) In that speech sentiments were given to him which he did not entertain, I. .d which he was therefore desirous of disclaiming. (Hear, beer.) On an unimportant occasion he would not have noticed the Woe take which was one that he had no doubt had been made unitise. Wished, hietrevei, that it should not be imputed so bins that he introduced the elan"; of an illustrious personage (we believe the Duke'of Yqrk) at a time that that royal personage did rot himself evince a disposition se bring them forward. If tic had done so be world consider that he bad abused the privilege he pos.. sessed is a Member of Parliament, in thus unwarrantably drawing the attention of the House to such a topic. (Hear, hear.) He hoped that the correction of this mistake would be communicated to the public through the same channel through which this error had been origially . conveyed. Mr. HE 31E w ished to know from the Chancellor of the Exche quer, whether, in the event of the death of the Princess Victoria, it was intended to continue the grant of 6,0001. to the Duchess of Kent. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that in the proposed giant lie did nut caculote on such a calamity befalling her RoyelHighnese. He thought it would be wanting in delicacy to mention such a subject to her Royal Highness. Mr. IILOIE said that he thought it was right to anticipate such an event, and if it had beer. anticipated in the case of one member of the Royal Family (we believe Prince Leopold) he would now perhaps be receiving only the income of one Royal Duke instead of the incomerif two, its was the cave at present. (Herr, hear.) As to the present grant. he was of opinion that even in the event rethe death of the daughter of her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent, the pant should be continued to het Royal Highness, and on the bonging in of the Bill, we understood the Hon. Gentle st:as to say be would move the introduction of a clause to that Effect. The Resolution Was then put, and unanimously agreed to. Mr. HEMP:, on the propooal of a grant of 6000 f. a year from the r.onsolidated Fimd, for the maintenance and education of the son of his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland, expressed his re. Vet at not seeing his Hoc. Friepd (Sir J. Newport) in his place, to snore the amendment which be had intended, relative to this grant. lie thought that there was no measure proposed by Government bias Session of ParlierriClit, which weeld meet with more general ii.ssatiafaction,. than the proposal of voting this sum of money to the Puke arotimberland ; for he should regard it in the light of an anomie* us the present large allowance of his Royal Highness. It Wes the more objmtionable, as Ministers refused to Milk the appli cation of it ;nee eductoion of the boy in Great Britain. (No, no, from the lidgmfektiat benches.) Hon. Gentlemen might as, no; but he imegligity yea, for an amendment to limit its application was d* gibe a rote of that House. He was desirous of know rag dl Mt should be made solely to this boy, as s similar grant. tee Alter before made for roe provision of a person ist the 'tame relation that he did to the throne. Be aidefletoll aesser had been given, stating the exact amount of the present receipts of the Duke of Cumberland. They knew he had 18,0001. a-year ; which, on the scale of expenditure in Prussia and Hanover, was equivalent, he understood, to 36,0001. a yea; in this country. Was this, he would ask, economy ? (Hear, hear.) More Testicular', was it economy to propose an increase to the income of Me Royal Highness at a time that Ministers declared themsetwea unwilling to remove any of the taxes? (Hear, hear.) liedelied Ministers to adduce any precedent to warrant such a grant as that now proposed to be made fur the maintenance of this boy of only two years of age. Even in the ease of those who were nearer the throne than the son of the Duke of Cumberland (in the use of the sons of the laii'llEiug) no such grant had been made. It was not prepared that 8.6001. a year, the sum voted for their main tenance and education, ',wield be even to them until they bed tr usted at a' more advanced age. In this grant made to the present Bole of Gloucester, and Iris raster, the former of 8,0001., the latter of 4,118.1. both standing in the same relation as this boy to the throne, there was no precedent to be foe n d to warrant the present pro vision. The vote to the Duke of Gloucester's...a% 8,9001. to be received .rat the death of his father ; so that it was clearly understood that the father was to educate his ern 'out of the 98001. that was granted to him by the Parliament. If that was the corm, he would ask on what principle it was that the House could now make a new pre. oedent, especially as they had on two former omseions refused to do so in the instance of the Duke of Cumberland. From that period so this, he writdd ask what had that individual done to gain the good-will of this House ? Wes it because he had s son, who was the sixth or seventh in succession to the Crown ? The Royal Duke should suit his mode of living to his circumstances, and pro 'wide for his son himself, until the yoiang prince came within that reach of the Crown which would make it the duty of Parliament to Me that • suitable provision was made five him. Another principle why this delay should be made was that the House a Con.ruons "ranted to the Princess of Wales a separate est Highness ad not 'been heir presiemptive to the Crown. But by the present vote the 'House was called upon to put the young Prince of Cumberland on trio same foottog with the Princess ofKent, who was the heiress ap. parent to the Crown. The vote was altogether an unproper one. Me thought the beet mode of taking the sense of the Bowe upon it was to pre a direct negntive (hear, boar, hear,) and if they should not now be trucemsful, he hoped they would at every stage pursue the same course and • fresh strength to their cause. lie was sure the people woul be with them (hear, bear.) and he was only surprised that his Majesty should have been so ill-advised by these woo had in the last one or two Sessions shown so great an an ime to snare the purse of the public. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEqUER said, if it had been the pleasure of the House. when, on a tornier occasion, it had teen proposed to increase the allowance to the Duke of Cumberland, to hem acquiesced in that proposition, undoubtedly it would have - own unnecessary to ask for any further allowaiice now on the birth of a redid ; because mom certainly when the addition to the allow ances of the Dukes of Clusece sad or CarnbriOge was made, it wits FP7 . 4 7r" • N intended as • premisiew for their intended to meet the possible and . But the Duke of Cumberland • • tat the time of his marriage, and t situation keen that of his Royal Tahiti o waashithst six years old, and not two had stated, he (the Chancellor of the Es ly 19enreive any thing outrageous to the feeli. • ,„ with, the practice of the House en other - ' an allowance should be now made to • education of his young Prince. Ths Hon. G Sunset objected that in the proposed grant the II upon to give the same sum to this young Prince as • 10 be Witen to the Princess of Kent, because the imeer proximity to the Crown. That was an argument a little .ent on the part of the Honourable Gentleman and ds, becauoe when his Majesty's Alinisters. did, in the rants, propose to make a difference in the allowance to the Clarence no account of his proximity to eke Crown, it was the Hon. Gentleman, and the sum of 10.0001. wMtit .ar the allowance of that Royal Doke, was reduced to consequence of the objection. lie therefore thought that ten were now only following the precedent which Pee d set them on the former occasion, by making no die. 'wren the grants to the young Princess and the young I were not at 111 liable to the objection which the lion. had taken on this ground. On a former night he he thought it was an honest and unreserved declare part of his 31ajesty'a Ministers, that the object of was not only to provide for the education of the also that that education thould be in this omel et was a fair and unequivocal statement made by he said that he Aid not at the tome time consider it ne. introduce such &declaration in the answer to the Mes. his Majesty. But if it should be thought necessary for Ire a decided expression of its object by introducing of the purpose for which the grant was made in the the Bill, be. bad no sort of objection to acquiesce in of that nature. He should be quite ready to give effect insetting any words In the Elll to ensure to the people of - the education of the Prince of Cumberland should this country. That was - his own sincere object, bat he did rot think the Douse ought to do it in any • either reflect upon the parents, or at ail affect theft Hon. Gentleman ( Mr. Hume) seemed however to subject as if it were a mere matter of cantle, that should be seasrated from his parents. A certain learned ' 4 the other night that he did not wish tint timpanist' iaould return to this country, that he would ratibt-w be a mid all that he required was, that the young Prince ode toted ire was a greet want of feeling in this endeavour to en. s it wee, the bake from his country, and thee tat taiga slid I and it was speaking very diarameitffillly of the pnito The House ought not to adopt a course which hard' and unfeeling towards the RoyalPareatat and for considered the mode he had proposed was the best adopted. The object, he would repeat, of the grant education t f the young Prince should be a good one, dish one (hear, hear), and if the grant should be made view to attain this object, there could not certainly be t objection on the part of his Slejesty's Ministers to a introduced in•o the Bill to that effect. (Hear, hear.) aft INGTON allowed the House that it was with the reluctance that he at any time made observations at all of weal nature, and 'add appeal to his conduct for the many yenewebat be had been in that House, in confirmation of his decla. ration. Upon the best consideration which he had been able to give of all that had passed in this Howie in the years 11116 and 1820, be had come to the most decided opinion that the decision or the House was on both those occasions correct and proper, (hear, bear), and he crusted that Hogse would not, under the pretence of 'venting 6 0001. for the education of the young Prince, violate the principle which they had observed on the two former occasion.; and in point of fact grant that now to the Duke of Cumberland, which had been refused to him twice before. He would say, that the. decisions of the House on the former occasions, were in complete unison with the feelings of the people. But if the House should make the grant now proposed, and thus depart from the principle it had hitherto observed, it became them to ON wbether a necessity existed for it, and if it did, then let them take especial care that the Act of Parliament should be sufficient SO sorry into complete effect that which the House meant really to do. Now as to the necessity of the grant, he confessed he was not pre- pared to say that sufficient grounds had been shown to induce the House to grant the sum required, not because the 8,000/. was in itself &consideration, for he knew 6.0001. could not be a matter of great moment to the country, but he thought sufficient grounds had not been shown ; because it was a bad precedent that they were ogled upon to establish, and because the Duke of Cumberland had already an ample allowance, adequate to do that which the.grant wee le at atle him to do, were lie disposed so to act. But it was aid as the fanner occasions that the Duke denied it to be his In tention to take up his residence abroad. Had he, however, re. turned to this country? Had he not, on the contrary, shown that it was hit full interten not to do so ? The Puke had a du•y to perform, not only as a parent, but as a British subject, and his latter duty was a paramount one, when It was considered in what relation his child stood to the throne of this country. The Duke should have come to England and have done what he could with his present income, and theii, • lf upon an investigation fully and fairly made, it appeared incompetent for him to maintain and educate the young Prince in that dignified and Munition% manner which the heir to the British Crown ought to be, then Parliament would have come forward and made a suitable provision for that purpose. But no ; the Duke remained abroad ; it had not been even hinted at that he was even now come to this country to take up his residence in It. Here was not the slightest intimation that such was his inten. tion. If that be so, then until the Duke should come to England, and had shown by his conduct that he was prepared to perform the duties he had t r discharge here, he (Dr. Lushington) thought It would be premature for the House to come to the vote proposed. But if even the Duke were here, how came it that the Duchess of Kent should be able, with 12,0001. a year only, to support her own high station in society, and find fitting education for her own daughter, who was nearer to the throne than the Prince of Cum berland. How came mil to be so, he asked, when it was con tended that the Duke could not support himself and educate his son with 19,0001 a year? It was the grossest inconsistency that could possibly be breached in this House. But even supposing the necessity of the grant to be allowed, yet to whom was the education of the young Prince to he entrusted ? Had the country proposed to give this power to the King or to the Duke of Cumber land ? It was well krown that by the laws of this country the grand. children of the King were subject to have their education directed by the Monarch; and it appeared that the opinion of the twelve Judges was, that the law was the same with regard to the nephews of the King. Now, supposing the King then was entitled to exercise this power, was it note gross absurdity for this (louse to make a grant to the King to enable him to pay it over to the Duke of Cumber land ? The House by this means would be separating the payment from the duty ; the King was bound to superintend the education of the Prince, and yet the grant was to enable his Majesty to pay the money to the Duke; but reverse the case: suppose the King was not entitled to that power, was it not high time that the House should inset: him with it ? If the Duke of Cumberland did not return to this country, was it not high time that Parliament should strengthen the power of his Majesty, and enable hint to watch and direct the education of a Prince so closely allied to the Crown ? Therefore, take the case in which way they pleased, whether the King had a right or not, it was td the last importance that the House shook', in this resolutior, give his Majesty that power which should scare the education of the young Prince in this country. He begged the Chancellor of the Exchequer's pardon ; but that Rigbt Hon. Gentleman had not correctly represented what lie (l)r. Lushington) said on a former night. Ile did not wish to sepatate the parent front the son, but what he said was, that he should not be willing to grant one shilling to the Duke, to induce him to come to this country, nor did he think that that individual had at all entitled himself to it. For the reasons be haul stated he thought it was necessary that the terms of the Resolution should be altered; and as his Right Honourable Friend the Member for Waterford was not in his place, he (Dr. L.) should take the liberty to a maim that the words " to his Royal Highness the Duke of Cumberland" should be omitted, and that at the conclusion the following words be added, "in the United Kingdom." He was the more con. vinced of the propriety of the House securing the fulfil. men of their own intentions, Lecausc he found that in the debate on the- last occasion, when the grant was pro be made to the Duke of Cuniberlai.„l, the Marquis of pro posed m Londonderry said, that the opinion of the Ilcuse on the first time the grant was proposed and rejected, was not sufficiently expressed' by any direct vote being made. If, then, that Noble Marquis thought so, it was necessary that the House 'should now do more than merely calling on the Right Honourable Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) to give his pledge, which, however, he ( Dr. Lushington) knew would not be violated so long as that Right Honourable Gentleman remained in office, and fur these reasons he should beg to move the amendment he had just read. Mr. CREEVF,Y could neither agree to the amendment nor the original resolution. During the whole time he had sat in Parlia ment. lie react' knew such an attempt as this proposed vote. The Duke of Cumberland had been brought twice before the House and twice rejected, and this was a third outrageous attempt, under false pretences, to obtain 60001. which had before teen refused. The name of the Duchess of Kent had been mixed up with it by the friends df the Duke, for the sole purpose of effecting their object. He should vote agaiast the grant in any shape. Mr. CRIPPS expressed himself friendly to the amendment, but to the Right lion. Gentleman the Chancellor of the Exchequer had declared that he should have no objection to insert similar weeds in the Bill, he should certainly vote for the original resolution. If the Honourable Gentleman Mr.‘Creevey) meant to say that this erne a juggle between the Duchess of Kent and the Duke of Cumber berland (no ! no!) Mr. CREE VEY begged to state that nothing was farther from lii; intention than to u.y any tiring disrespectful of the Duchess of Kent. What he said was, that the friends of the Duke of Cum berland had mixed tip her name with it, in order to get this grant through the House, and that even against her Royal Highness's will. She was aatistird with what the Parliament had already done foe her, and did not require to have her name connected with that of the Duke. (Hear, hear.)— Mr. CRIPPS said, if it appeared to hint that such was the coat, he should vote against the motion, but as lie could not go the length. of the lion. Gentleman, he should support the grant. Mr. HUDSON GURNEY thought that the Duke of Cumber land was ill-treated by the Hoare, and that it WWI now only re deeming itself from i•s former injustice, lie considered the claims of all the Royal persons who were equally related to the throne to be equally entitled to a ptovition from the country, and that when the Royal Dukes of Clarence and Cambridge had an additional al- - . r•-• • \ _AL livd;n g to the Hem Member's motieftl , stisther they would hot only intend, grout web ft teat ut *mkt bet eullelent present exigencies, was also linen& until he Report of the Conienissioners coo Wildly examined P a family. Rut Mr. Cl a MST%tought the sums already were proposed at the saki ia mad be mere even at that differeot sites* mee perlog" ... rdlie . theft dui the present • son who ma t state ataintatisals nod so mem be gowned until Member had at lbe&theinkapoileadaft.,_ title tese.. not possibly ster Pt WI iligOleveM MINA time to the oaf and inconsistent wit mein assume easitled_ter say thee It siwaii t te= she eserse requiring that isopoeimeei sown indeeC *lt Oftlimis- Duke for the imam %%Ed, eefteliftrall r coed elisseftbly sued egea, man (Mr. Hum iftememe Obit WM pekes eabetituraihr was called spot Marie ether, ifta bees assislistel et Melte eftmequetee. The intended to be I Repeat was sew seedy, acid blikbe had de doubt, be delivered in in loser prolitt a lbw daconsistent on lat. C .H.. HUTCHINSON said a fe* MAD upon the state et( his friend', bee edilisration in beistad. former grants, I e. RICE then said that he would hot duo* any obstacles Duke of Claret) fia the way of the heftiaess of thollowes, aft eftitled it was under- 'objected to by tl mend they should take the discussion when the Resolutions came arhs deed for t 1 to* reported in the C.emmittor. 0,1001. in conics 111 Bemetory PEEL said he was es Wasions the Report the Ministers w ahead be pretested without delay, that be had that morning sent Lament had Pet Abe the printer to indite, him to hasten the work. The Report, 'unction betweer whisk held only bens preeesited at he dl.. that dky aonsisted of Prince. and wet SO yaps of writing, which walla make Ida-pages ad letter-prees, Gentleman had sad sioesid dierefore take as yet some time before it could be pro. stated, and he eimed. If it mould be any eattsfactioft to the Hon. Gentleman the tion on the pat Report aught be brought up on FFMky. this vote weal Mr. HOME said di) or 70,0001. had already been voted by the boy, but also Mow open theist estimates, end be would object to any further t 7. That ws seam being entmed until they were in possession of the Report. him ; but he it The CRANCELLOR o the EXCHEQUER undemanding mama to toyed ftom his Hon. Friend (Mr. F. Lewis) the rman of the Corn- sage from his E that. , no legislative meows could hit founded upon the the house to gin E'sbis Session. he.ueyld not sea why these establishments • declaration of be leg to shift be themselves tiU the ensuing Sateen. preamble of the The erase now demanded wen /or their immediate support, and as any clause of tit greed/ago( these did net pledge the Houle es any positive arrange. to this by inseiti amok he paw no ground for lls• opposition displayed by the Hon. England that ;I UentIODDID opposite. take place in tt After fi Ow words (rem Mr. fkeretwrz . PßEL, in securing it Its Me. S. RICE consented to withdraw his amendment, and the way that might Reuse went man a Committee. The drat Reeolotion, granting the feeln.ge. The sum of 11,1001. fur the rapport of melons ('barter Reboots, was the child should On the Rawhides that a sum be granted for the continuance of Civilian said the 7PwAlie Wert! ! Cumberland oho DM HUMP; ob jected to the nadertaking of any new works. should not , and 1tir.'094,11011 RN said the 00111011 had voted a large sum for Armlet be ethics Politic Wm** im lrelsnci, during the seas*: of distress, to en- thought there WI cc *ivory cad afford employment to the distressed papule- patriate, as it we P t ' latien—erterns bed been then oornmeneed--roads formed, and him his child t bridge' projemed, which they were now called upon to finish ; end illustrious Duke hr thought that upon inquiry, the greatest advantages would be was either harsh sound to have resulted from what had been already done. At all that reason he cc • create, they must Iluish those undertakings which were now in pro. that could be add ENOS. wig, that the edt 31r. GRATTAN expressed a hope that the present system that and an English prevailed in Ireland., relative to the making of roads, would be put then with a view an end to. In 'Rune counties, Government gave 111111111411 Ce, and in the slightest obj others. as in the county of Wicklow, a fair proportion or support clause being intr DU not given. He wished a system of equal assistance should be Dr. LUSH given to all the counties of Ireland. greatest reluclan • Mr. PEEL was of opinion that Public Works was the most a personal newt _ . ~L ... I "r""mmwrmi . -1 „'~, ` :~, THE PRIWS. lowan ee, the Have men, in thorteeemincond beam to have mode the same to thlt Dolts of Nod lb tio of Suiset; Oe thought f ' . diciatt 0- (Hear. hear.) __ _ the us right to interfere - in the education of the son; nor to : to the Duke how lie should etheennedea shikires. Siker, bear, and laughter.) Ho rhoteklayetei for the original resolution. Ste 01:0ROS ROBE mode some obaereltions relative to the personal chats/nu of the Duke of Ceimbeeland, bat his sentences were ao imperfectly heard In the gallery that we could not collect even the tenor of them. We understood him to speak highly of ' his Royal Highness's character both as a gentleman and as a pa- I writ; and "the Right Hon. Baronet atromly recommended the ' ' House not no adopt a course that would have a tendency to ester rate the minds of the Royal Parents, or excite an acerbity which might ultimately sheen half towards the child. hie WM. CONGREVE said he had had an opportunity of see ing the Royal Duke within the last two months, and he found that , his Royal Highness was perticularly, punctual in the discharge of his debts in k the place where ite was residing. He should support the original Resolution. Mr. CHRISTOPHER SMITH was one of those who coon. dered the Duke to have been very Mused, and that he had been driven from his native land by serious auefinoendOes. He am ceived It would be very ungenerous of this Hingee to interfere with the educatioe of his Royal Highness's sop. The vote should have his nem support. Air. PEEL said, he wse quite sure nothing could be more un pleasant to this House than to enter into the discussions which had unfortunately been brought forward, and he should therefore, in the few words he had to say, avoid all those topics which he thought had "nothing- whatever to do with the real question before the House. He should not concur in the Resolution of his Right lionourable Friend, for the reason •which an ,Honourable Member had assigned, namely, because it wee a cure of an act of injus tice ; but he should do it on the ground that there was such a change in circumstances, that in agreeing to this vote, even if the Vouse was tight on the two former occasions, he conceived there was no inamstateiny whatever. The lion. and learned Gentle man opposite (Dr. Lushington) had slid that the nisestioess 'or the House to consider were—host, whether there was a secessity for the grant ? and next, what was the best way in which that grant could be made? This was a Perfectly fair way to put the qsawasa. The Honourable Member fir Montrow had said that Flawe was bound to edueste his own children, and that he se live is such a way as to be able to do so. That WAS iety time is paws life; but ha (Mr. Peel) thought there lair $ eery vest_ aelllmiliea to be made when the child to be 40aleael was a MIMI& as eaaldeied that they had all an interest he Ili lillistOtilla II A rassame pf the Royal Family, and that the twee therein INNd to assist in providing for that education. Mg OM I• 1118618.“ what Was adequate to enable the pa infillftweieetiellellit feet ledieidual, it was a question which did net lahed! elf dieleasholhila Twelve thousand pounds might in one Ileileinteellilleets la easeeher twenty thus led pounds might . talks! ". be 16616(°" saabie11 t t ri e e lt o che 3 as iem of b l e c rlM t r o . I t l , u nl n ii i s e t ! "mar air al tiseetlon, 'and yet that it should require lOW to WEE of as Duke of Cumberland educating his son, he (Ur. Ps) was sa washer there was not a material difference bore= dim Okada 4 a lomof widow who had to provide for the shadow 4 a nand that of a Royal Duke who had to dlseste is teat and Learned Gentleman (Dr. Lush. 131 . 819 ) Nile ..,_ _ not the Duke come and reside in this country? • CNOCIllei) thought that some expressions which had failen hen tlallthik and. Learned Gentleman himself would be quite Illailin W his Royal (littleness to remain abroad ; and heart derails AO lam were wirier the Hon. and Learned Gent lew demewslise that were made on a former occa sion aim* eif 41mt Date, there would appear to be a very bile lasi Highness should not return to this austryilliiir why said that although the pledge of his Rlielltalasseasble "rime la, Chancellor of the Exchequer) wee ea Eisloted. that the edacation of the young Prince watiteerbig kW ' la sake be in Ecgland, yet that the tenor 4 his sisseisamas mat a so listing a nature as to remove the fears that a Man administration might swerve from that pledge. He a stale apprehension, and did not think it at all u Vol the House should, In a case like this, require . WWW = e , : sii tiscom anainintbtan enacting pledge of n a .. n t linister. If', the t re- NdssCHtese h , e w ac' e t i o n ge p t a ntrelu i CeZ ni ett e p w res or stg as th h a e t the pat was map apoe the condition that this child ahead be edweesedielaiellea , himselt have not theyeast objection. at air eismated the aame oot to insist upon it that the father shesktlit *plea of ell influence or control over his son. Don't ewitteate sheyys.llsltljj rain. in a manner that shall teach him or the ter that the father was unworthy to euperin. 171=adataidas. The King of England had a right to interfere mid sapithwead la the education of the Branches of the Royal lama,) bat he could not think it prudent or wise that a prince who el &be the future King of this country, should brttlucated in a esaaese thee implied the father to be unworttfy of super- Interarkkag the bringing up of the 'son, and that would in east deprive the sort of all parental care and guardianship. H. would sit &An with the earnest hope that the House would Snag to the proposition of his Right Hon. Friend, only with the condition that some valid security by Act of Parliament should be given that the education of the young Prince of Cumberland should be iodate country, over whose destinies he may hereafter be called 0 Mom /Me. CALHAAI- offered sonde observations, which were in. the pllary, andinulreapted by fsetrasnt cries of— . pa ' r. BROUGHAM considered thiga most 'painful question to diesma, but for that reason he conceived that the sooner the House eamaris a tisedelem a Oen it the better. Hewes willing to concede that lamest bleb fin trance to secure the education of the young Priam of Oarnbarland in England. Admitting this, however, he would refer to the principles upon *hid] he opposed the grant; first adverting to a sarcastic obseiration which had fallen front a Right Hon. Gentleman opposite (31r. Secretar'y Peel). It had been said that it was inconsistent for gentlemen professing libeeil principles to propose to interfere with a father in the education of his own child. Now, in justice to the consistency of those gentle men who professed and acted too upon liberal principles, lie (Mr, Brougham) would say, that no Aletriber of that /louse objected to a father educating his own child, if that father was willing to pay the expenses of the child's education team his own pocket. Btu !when, the public were called upon to supply the money for his vitt elation, that House, as guardian of the public purse, should inquire into the circumstances under which the grant was called for. So , much for the terms upon which the gram was proposed to be given. I fie (Mr. Brougham) objected to it upon principle, and would vote I against it altogether. He should be glad to have heard any pre cedents quoted in support of such a grant. He professed himself ignorant of the precedents which applied. lie should have been very glad to hear any precedents which may exist brought forward, more especially as it was likely that we should heir of many more similar applicatiOns in other cases. If thin proceeding should be laid down as a precedent, it would go to support the principle, that as often an any Prince or Princess is born to any of the many Princes and Princesses of the Royal blood, the House of Commie, should be obliged to grant 6,0001. pet ann. for the education of these .scions of the Royal stock, as soon as they arrived at an age to be educated. The only precedent whieh he,remembered bearing on the case, was one that he should incline to follow, because of the ' eminent virtues of the individual more immediately interested in it. He was not inclined to fiat err royalty, but when he mentioned the Duke of Gloucester, he named an illustrious individual who was universaly respected. His Royal Highness had never involved himself in pecuniary embarrassments, and for this reason lie was willing to look to his case as a precedent. But what did the precedent in his Royal Highness's case prove? When the tether of his Royal Highness (the late Duke of Glou cester) had a provision made, it was perspectively, and was not to operate till after the decease of the late Duke. This weir the precedent which bore upon the CAW ; but were we now to turn over a new leaf? Is it now laid down as a principle, that after 18,000/. per annum had been granted to the father, he sidea ' incidents, such as regiments and other offices, a grant of 6,000/. per year ahould be added to the income of that father, during his life, for the education of his son. He understood the case of the Duchess of Kent was introduced as a precedent; but this, in point of fact, was part and parcel cf the present measure. Now, the Duchess of Kent, living in her high station, had 6,00 d. a-year ' with which, no doubt, it might be di ffi cult to sup- port her rank. However, much to her credit, the Duchess of Kent, with the assistance of Prince Leopold, her brother, con trived to live within her limited income, and made no application for an increase. He did not believe the Duchess of Kent or Prince Leopold were desirous that such a ro pposition shOuld be made,' and if %V could as so, any thing b e mitre unjust than to allow it to go forth to the public that they are in the same situation with the Duke of Cumberland, who applies for the grant. An /lon. MEM BER from the Treasury Bench observed, that the Duke of Cumberland did not apply. Mr. BROUGHAM resumed—if the Duke of Cumberland did not apply, there could tee no doubt that he assented to the applies non, but the Duchess of Kent and Prince Leopold did not assent to the application. Because the active friends of the Duke of Cumberland assented to such a proposition the Duchess of Kent in to be brought in, and mixed up with his Royal Highness. The Duchess of Kent had only 6,0001 per annum, the Duke of Cumberland 19,0001. ; therefore, because the Duke asks foe an augmentation to his income of 19,0001. and the Duchess of Kent deer nat ask for any augmentation of her 6,000/. therefore, he was called upon to vote the public money to Inc Duke of Cumberland and the Duchess of Kent. He (Mr. Brougham) was prepared to vote against the grant altogether. It was au unnecessary abuse of the confidence which was largely extended to that House, on all oc. casions where provision was to be made for the Royal Family. Prince Leopold, by the measure before the House, is indirectly at. tacked for not supporting his niece; but the fact should be known, that Prince Leopold does not object to support his niece. These were painful subjects, and he would pass over them as lightly as possible. He would willingly ad mit that this question had nothing to do with popularity. ' -if the grant was made it mast be made to support the rank and station of die individual, and not-because of the -private claims of that individual. Until the individuals were publicly stigmatised, which was not the case in any instant:. the House was bound to consider the questions as betwesn A and B, and think nothing of popularity. He could not forget that the Rouse had before refused to give the Duke of Cumberland 6,000/. a year. This was the decision of the House ; he did not argue that it was right or wrong, but he would refuse to grant indirectly what was refused when a direct application was mule. If Ministers now . came and asked the House to abet that opinion, he should be in. dined to entertain such a proposition ; but whilst the opinion re mained without being rescinded, he could never consent to have it overthrown by an Indirect measure. As to the propriety of in crfering with the mode of education which a father may adopt for -- S ...S. s his child, he should observe„ that as he was opposed to such in terference in the case of the late Princess Charlotte, who was taken front the cant of the late Queen (her mother), fbr no other reason but because she was not popular. so he was equally adverse that the care of the young..Psince of Cumberland should be taken from his father, Wallin he was unpopular. Popularity. or the want of it, in his opinion. could have no influence on :lateral rights. Mr. Secretary CANNiNO said it was not proposed to vote 6,0001. a year for the Duke of Cumberland, nor was it proposed as an atone ent for any former &Beton of the House. The proposal grew out of the fact, that the Duke of Cumberland's child had grown to such an advanced age as rendered k asomeary that his education should . be entered upon, and the country, from the rela tion in which he stood to the Crown, had an Interest in providing for his education in a manner suitable to the high station which it was possible he may hereafter he called u po n to fill. From the re lation in which he literals to the Throne the State has an interest in the education of the child, which is altogether unconnected with the rank of his parents. Now the parents of the child are living abroad, and we did not In any manner propose to interfere with the mode of education which the parents may think it advisable to adopt., but foe certain reasons we think it expedient to stipulate that his education should be carried on at home. The parents of the child have the option either to MUM to England with the child or to see him safely brought over. By leaving thin option the House would avoid any rude interference with the mode of education-which the parents may deer it proper to pursue in the education of their child ; whilst by the condition that his education should be carried on in Eng. land, that condition with which Parliament cannot part, would be secured. Thin option concedes the right of the parent to adopt the best mode of educating his child. whilst it secures every thing that could be desired as to the place of his education. The country under the circumstances had a deep and strong interest in the edu cation of this young prince. The whole cane lay in these few words, and almost every thing else which had been introduced wa.. in his opinion, extraneous. Former votes of that House should be put out of the question. The vote to the Duchess of Kent was equally inapplicable. It had been stated by the Hon. and Learned Gentle man (Mr. Brougham) that the proposed vote to the Duchess of Kent wak applied for without her lament. As to any ?chic ' tance on the part of her Royal nightie's the Duchess of Kent to receive the grant if such reluctance existed he, (Mr. Canning) had ;lever heard it ; but he nine' add, !east his observation should be mistaken that that illustrious lady had conducted herself in that retired and unobtrusive manner which became not only her sex but her station. (Hear. heart., hear.) In conclu sion he would repeat that the votes of the House, on former mot %ions, were quite extraneous, the only question was, whether the House would now furnish the means of educating a Prime, who might hereafter be called upon to rule the destinies of the country. (Ilear, hear.) • Sir F. BURDETT was not satisfied with giving, by an indirect vote, what had been retooled in a direct way. He did not see what claim the Duke of Cumberland had upon the public to provide for the educatiofi of his son. He thought we might run the risk, anti allow the father to educate his own child If this grant had been argued upon the private merits of an individual, lie feared that he should subject himself to be charged with having used lan guage unparliamentary and indecorous should he speak the candid feeling of his heart. Ile Was afraid if such had been the ground of argument that he could not have used three words without having every third word offensive, but fortunately the question now stood upon other grounds, and he could perform his duty to the country without any violence to his own feelings or those of Hon. Cleitilenien opposite. He was glad to see that !Ministers had discovered the reluctance of the House to go all the way with them ; and in consequence of this manifestation of feeling they had wisely changes! the tone of their application as well as altered its object. (Hear, hear.) This he said was the impression made on his mind by the discussion which had taken place on the sub ject. Ministers now took up the subject, not upon the claims of the Duke of Cumberland, but upon public grounds, upon the assump tion that the young Prince may one day tome to the Throne. Upon these grounds they demanded COWL per annum for his education : 6.000/. per annum for the education of an infant only six year' old ! How could such an infant require so large a sum to be expended upon his education ? How could a more certain way be devised of insuring that he should be badly educated, than by surrounding him with folly and caprice, than by spending six thousand pounds per year upon his education ? The result of such a system of education must be unfavourable. Besides, it was not incumbent upon the public to provide -for the education of this infant. ( Hear, hear.) The public may safely run the risk, and leave his Royal father to give him whatever kind of education he should choose. In his (Sir F. Burdett'n) opinion, their best system of education was that regular ',item aff o rded to all persons of rank n this country ; but by surrounding this infant with little state. and an expenditure of 6,0001. a year, what was he likely to become ? As far as the public was concerned, he (Sir F. Burdett) would much rather, if such a grant was made, that it went into the pocket of his father, rather than have the child spoiled by being educated in such an expensive manner. But why, he would ask, was this unprecedented demand mixed up with a provision for a Noble Lady who made no demand ? and also with an implication upon another Noble Individual, for whom ample. provision was made by the public ; as if that Noble Individual had manifested I any reluctance to contribute to the expencesof the amiable lady with whom he is so nearly connected. He looked upon this as an additional objection to a grant which-lseepposed altogether upon principle. It was only it mask to cover the measure, and lie saw no other meansof getting rid of it, but by negativing the proposition wt once. Su posing that the co.intry could be proved to have an interest in the educatior of the child, there was no security in the manner of the grant. if it were declared by Lawyers, and was the opinion of the House, that t :e-grand-children of the King should he under the gutdance of the King. his Royal Highness, nor the Royal family had no right to complain when the country supplied ample funds for the education of the children. If such was the resolution of the House, the sum of 6.4001 per annum should not be Framed without some security. It should be granted to the King Tor the education of the infant, and not granted to the King to hand over to the Duke of Cumberland. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said the Hon. Baronet seemed to consider that the ireposed grant to the Duchess of Kent was a mere mask; but the Hon. Baronet forgot that after the death of the Duke of Kent in MIN, the Marquis of London derry, then Secretary for Foreign Affairs, was asked in that House, whether it was meant to propose any addition to the grant of 13,0001. a year, enjoyed by the Duchess of Kent? and the reply was, that it was then considered unnecessary, as Prince Leopold had under. taken to contribute to the support of his sister and her child ; but it was distinctly understood that this should not be considered as a permanent arrangement, did that her Royal Highness the Duchess of Kent should not always be dependent upon Prince Leopold for a maintenance for herself and her child (Hear, hear.) Mr. BROVII HAM again rose amidst cries of " Question." We understood him to suggest, that as his Majesty's Ministers had chnceded to the proposal for the introduction of a coercive clause, enforcing the education ef the young Prince in Egland, his Hon. and Learned Friend (Dr. Lushington) should consent to withdraw Ills amendment, in order to give the House an opportunity of de ciding upon the principle of the measure, and tf such should be their deciehm, of negativing the grain altogether. Dr. LUBIIINGTON had no objection to concede to the sugges tion of his Honourable and Learned Friend, but he wished dis tinctly to undentand from his Majesty'a Ministers whether they , agreed with the whole amendment. He clearly understood that they conceded to the education of the young prince in England, but he asked had they also agreed that the proposal should be voted to his !Majesty for the education of the child, and not to his Majesty to he handed to the Duke of (7uniberland ? Dlr. Secretary CANNING said a few words in reply, which were inaudible. The House then divided, when the numbers were— For the Grant. 120—Against it, 97-3lajority, 21. While strangers were excluded we understood that Mr Brougham intimated to the House that on Constitutional grounds, as well as there appearing in the House, and even amongst the people them. selves, a temporary or accidental coldness with regard to economy, and a disposition uxitecessarily to spend the public money. he should at every future stage continue to give the measure his most strenuous opposition. JUDGI:ii IN INDIA. When re.admitted we found Mr. C. W. W. %V YNN address. ing the House on the Bill for making provision for Judges in India. Mr. HU3IE wished that its consideration should be postponed. However, after a:few words from Dr. PHILLImtonE, and Sir E. ro RIES, the House resolved itself into a Committee un the Hilt. Mr. C. W. IV. WYNNE proposed and carried several clanses, amongst which was one entitling Judges to retired allowances, on certificate of ill health after tive.years service. Alter some few observations fmin Mr. Hume, Mr. C. W. W. M'ynn. Ir. W. Smith, Sir C. Forbes., and Mr. Trant, the reso lutions were agreed to; the report was received and ordered to be taken into farther consideration on. Friday next. The other oriltr: .of the day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned it half-past twelve o'clock. • HOUSE OF COMMONS TIIIS DAY. NOTICES OF MOTIONS. Mr. John AVilliarns--To present Yutition complaining of delays in the Court of Chancery. Mr. Sykes—Reduction of the put t' on Snap and Tallow Candles. ORDERS OF TIIE DAY. Cotton Mills-Regulation BilL,Committee. British Consuls Bill—Committee. Townland lloundaries (Ireland Labourers 11ages Bill. PRICES 01' FOREIQN Austria) Bonds (10 Gu. per X St.) 95 6 5B Ditto Acct. 95 161 Bruilian Bonds STOCKS NESTERDA V. 'Greek Bonds bOi 16 , . 7 OM 4 Ditto Strip ) ii/ 104 4 4 01 dis Ditto Actt. 10 dis Ditto Scrip DI W 3) 3 i * d 4dis Ditto Icct. 2 3Om Buenos Ayres Bonds 90* Ditto Acct. Mexican Bonds 734 3 4 Ditto Acct. 7344 4 Dittolicrip (10:44.) 4 i t 4 4 die Oiito Acct. 44 di. Fertivian.Donds_7o Colombianßonds 834 Ditto Acct. Ditto Rondo ORO 06 5# 3 5 44 54 5 Ditto Acct. 854 5 4 Danish Bonds 102 1 Ditto Marks Banco 102 Ditto Scrip (1825; 7 dis Portuguese Bonds 1191 Ditto Acct. 891 I Prussian Bonds 100 W 1 I Ditto Bonds (1922) 1 1 a Russian Bonds 93 21 3 1 I 11 Ditto Acct. 93 a 1 Spanish Cons. 23 2 31 24 4 Ditto Acct. 23 21 Ditto Cons. (lag) Unto Acct. 191 Ditto Scrip (1825; 4/ die . Ditto Acct. 4j di. French Relates S pr Ct. 100 f. 75c.. Exchange 251. We. Ditto Rentes 3 per Ct. 74f. 75c. E xchange 25f. lec. ~ a • 5 1 13 P - 7- ••", "`":: ~: ~. --~--. 4 ALL THIS DAY, AT FIVE—TWO OF 13t1.000—TWO OF EIO,OOO—TWO OF £l.OOO, itc. 6,r—t 30.000 FOR NINETEEN GUINEAS THIS DAY, AT FIVE. The PAIS/ commenced irtoUsliing yesterday neerniog at live o'clock. LONDON, TUESDAV, MAY 31, 1895. In the Paris Papers of Saturday there is scarcely one sr tide worth extracting. The Etoile contains a Pros/arm don from the Mayor of Rheims on the Coronation. It it followed by the programme for the arrival of the Ktwo in the department of the Marne, and the entrance of his MA.. JEST Y into the city of Rheims. The KING KAuld step at Tinqueux, to step into the coronation carria e. Ills ar rival would be announced by a salvo of artillery. Accord ing to an article in the Constitutionnel, the Spanish Govern ment is becoming somewhat milder. The passports are in future to he w hat they profess to be, cards of surety instead of tickets of proscription. Deputies from the Clergy have been called together, to confer respecting the sale of the seventh of the ecclesiastical estates granted' by Pius VII. to CHARLES IV. There is, however, great reason to anti cipate the strongest opposition to this measure, and consi dering how much FERDINAND depends upon ° the priests, he will hardly venture to enforce it. FRENCH FUNDS.—PAR/S. MAT 28.—Five per Cram opened at 101 f. 53c. ; closed at lOU W. Three per Cent.. 74f. 90c. Bank . Stock, 2193 f. Rente de Naples, Certif Falronnet, W. 89c. Royal Spanish Loan, 1823. 57. Exchange on London month, 24f. 23c. ; three months, 24f. W.—Cosstr Atitheniiyoe, May 28. We have received advices from Bogota to the Isth of March. The Minister Plenipotentiary from the United Provinces of Central America wits formally received by the Vice-President of Colombia on the 26th of February. The latest news from Peru by this channel is to the 7th of January. The fortress of Callao still held out. Bo- LIOAR had issued a proclamation outlawing the garrison for not submitting under CAN rEltill'a capitulation. Four gun-boats had escaped from Callao, and passed over to the besieging army. The following are extracts from the papers [From El Corestilarimtal of Math 10.1 Amongst the proofs of the enlightened and liberal spirit of the age, and that the antiquated a stems of monopoly and exclusion are flat mouldering away before the more advantageous nod more ex tensively beneficial principles which the diffusion of the science of !maned economy has introduced among the commercial interews, may be fairly clamed the speculations to South America. which have been entered into with so much avidity in Europe, brit mere particularly in England. The benefits which must neceasuily ac crue to both countries from this interchange of what each respect ively is in want of—the one capital, the other a field to employ then surplus capital upon, are incalculable. Nor is it only in a com mercial point of view that this intimate intercourse - between the two nations as likely to be beneficial. The employment given to our indigent population, the introductioo amongst them of what has been hitherto esteemed articles of luxury, the acquirement of habits of cleanliness, industry, morality, and of that resin et to themselves as men which they are now so lamentably in want of ; in fine, the being reieued from the degraded feelings of slaves, to the manly independence of freemen, are cirentostances which must attend the Introduction of capital into this country, and, in our opinion, are not of less importance to us than that our ports be filled with ship piing to carry away our surplus of cocoa and coffee. We have been led into there reflections on perusing the prospectus of the Colon). bian Mining Association, which has lately been formed in England for the purpose of working the mines of Colombia. A more re. spectable body of men as Directors can hardly he shown at the head of any Company in the world, and arc a convincing prole( the anxiety and exertions of the original projector, to promote the prosperity and welfare of Colombia, and to place every thing in connexion with this country on the most respectable footing. [From El Colutititclottal of March 17.1 MEXICAN LEOATION.—We stop the press to announce Me agreeable and interesting news of the arrival of his Excellence C— lone! Anastasio Torten', Minister Plenipotentiary from the Urine , • States of the Republic of Mexico to the Republic of Colombia. II: is accompanied by his Secretary of Legation, Sr. Ignacio Baseir:. a eon, we have been given to understand, of the gentleman who wiai Intendant of this city on the memorahle lath of April, in the yet: 10. They came by the way of North America, and cast anchor i 1 the port of La ( uayra oa the 10-h inst. In the afternoon, where the , were entertain with a truly republican banquet, at which there seemed a con) etition between the cordial felicitatioos on the halve arrival of out illustrious goes's, and the ingenuity of the toas:s celebrating the advantages and impulse that the cause of !Mere would receive from the relations of friendship and alliance esub . lishendinbg of the 2d h between 2 the tßeepy arrived in t his übl u if:of It t lexi ci co ty, an d Colombia. On the morning till they have recovered from the fatigues o w their will voyage,l remain when drei will proceed immediately to Bogota —Consfiforiorto o Carew. Fitt:NCO MISSION.—CARTHAGENA, FF.I. la.--On the 14th Instant the French legate of war Constancia, under the command d Count Si. Simon. came to an anchor in this bay. She Whigs on Sean! the Marquis Magnum, who will set out immediately for Co 'tote. to deliver, it is said, into the hands of the Vice-President 0: certain the Republic despatches fr om the French Oovernment et great importance.—Car th agrea Gozette. BOGOTA. AIMICII 17. lfif:c On the 13th instant, at half-peat five in the afternoon. a pc: ~. meeting took place in the Chapel of the University of this nil,. h: which were present Dr. Pedro Gun!, Secretary of State for Foteurin Affairs; Dr. Antonio Melo, Member of the Senate ; Pr. Joaquin Comer and Dr. Mariano Al ino. Members of the Chamber of lie. presentatives ; Dr. Jose Maria Esteves, Rector of the College ei San Bartolome ; Fattier Joaquin Galvos, Rector of the University Father Mariano Gamic*, Prior of the Dommican Consent ; l)r. Nicolas Quebedo ; and the Secretary of the University. The. meeting was assembled at the instance of Mr. Thompson. Arlo' the British and Foreign Bible Society, with the view of establishing a Bible Society in Colombia. The rules for the proposed Society were read, and after some observations from Sr. God, it was ca' solved unanimously to call a general meeting eft Sunday nest, 14., ~~ . - Elie Nritioh preoo. DRVIrI-rANR 7 . IIRATILZ Tu-murrow Evening. WEDNESMV, June 10 be performed THE 'Das; E. AND DR. F.AD The Prlnelpal Characters by Ne . ormWaihkek= n llll l•7. Brow 13 se. Archer, ...dfurd. Yltsbrillasn, and Peaky ; Stephen.. L . Paeon. and Purer. After which, TM a: aV ROBBINS BON' ar, THE. CASTLE OF OLIVAL. The Wandering Buys, Miss Clara Fisher mad Mho Culatt. COVENT-u.4EDEN THEATRE. FOR THE BENEFIT or MR. JONES. This Evening. TUESDAY, May 31, will be performed FON FAINICBLEAU; or, OUR WAY IN FRANCE. Laekland, Ur. Jones; lleury, Mr. Sinclair; Rosa, Miss M. 'Frei: . WIN Paton. End of the Play a celebrated Dance by Miss Foote and tinaViaing. After which, HIGH LIFE HELOW STAIRS. Lovel, Mr. C. Kerilble: Lord fluke'' Servant, Mr. Jones; Sir Harry's Servant, Mr. Farley. Mrs. Kitty, Mrs- Gibbs. Tu emsclude with THE SLEEP WALKER. ' Sow" Mr Yates. . . HAY4f.4E — KEr 7'III:ATER. This Evening, T I EqD if'. May 31, will he perforated I'l IE mynriv WI VCS OF WINDSOR. Sir John Falstaff, Mr. Dowton; Master Slender, Mr. J. Russell: Justice *bellow, Mr. Younger; Ford, Mr. Vining; Sir thigh Evans, Mr. Williams; Fenton, Mr. Melrose; Dr. Caine, Mr. W. West. Mrs. Ford, Mre.Waylett ; Alm Page, Mrs.T. Hill; Anne Page, Mies Wage; Mrs. Quickly, dim. C. Jones. After Which, YOUTH, LoYE, AND FOLLY. Baron de Briatreourt, Mr.Williatns ; Load de Lineal, Mr. Mertes: Florinind, Mr. Yining; Antoine, Mr. Wilkinson. Artuette, Mrs. numb,'; Bohm Mrs. T. Hill. To Conclude With THE LADY AND THE DEVIL. Wildlove, Mr. P. Ferretti Zee:A . "7lqm Mrs. Waylett. To-morrow, 'file Mayor of Garrett. Aslant Like It, and Peeping Tina. UNDER THE ESPECIAL PATeitONAGK OF Tilt KING. NOVA/, GA RDENS..VAUXIIA To-morrow Evening, wcoNnsrmY, June 1, and every llttsedel, WednesdaY; said Friday daring the Season. The Proprietm s have the gratification to ;date, 'with the View to deserve the highland unbotthded pataanape which they have hitherto received, and to enable them to make the most extendve and inm. resting srningernents for the future, they have recently purtinised the whole of these celebrated Gardens ; a n d the l'ublic may rest assured that the Musical Dcpartruernt and Amusements of every descrip tion a , ill be such as to insure a ountinumwe of ,that exalted and national favour, which, with the most grateful pilde, they ackuuw ledge. The Amusements will commence with a 'rand Vocal and Instru mental Concert; au overture, composed elllthstlY for the ocesseom by Mr. W. !Woke. At the conclusion of the Concert the National Anthem of "God save the King" will be song by the whole vocal. strength. At the new Theatre an entirely new Ballet, called " Fortelle, or the Peasant Prince;' with appropriate new Scenery, Dramas, ant Darorat Sign- c F. H. I'. Mesterei de Verani will exhibit his extraindingeld. , talents in performing on Six different Installments at the same time. I'he French Juggler, Monsieur Robert, Is re-engaged, and will ex* bit hi, pleasing Feats, with several new Performances. Bled:noire is also re-engaged to perform his terrific Ascent on thm Fire-Work Rope tram the Moorish Towers he will also 2xlWhilllM wonderful Evolntione on the Sleek Rope. The Vantoccini, by Mr. they, will be performed with many arm , Figures. Several new Cosmorarnas have been added, and will be ebespllg during the Season. The three Artist! in Fire-Works, who last Season obtained - OW great celebrity, are agaku engaged. Chevalier Sonthby will szballt this Evening; Madame Stingier on Weduceday ; and Mr. DlErier oil • Friday. Each Artist has undertaken to produce great novelty, with, Devices never yet equalled. The 111 , 3minatlons will surpass those of any former Season. Supper Boxes may be engaged, and Free Admissions for the Snider Night may be had at the Gardens; at the Loudon M int Counseirelc. Office. 141. Fleet-street; LoustaiDenuine Tea Company, 23, Ludgate. MD, 148, Oxford-street, and 8, Charing-cross. *is Doors open at fieven.—Admisslon 3s. 6d. ~~`~ Fr•lr •.:fir; r ISO Wilmot. order to Odra soar es Mai f kf Owe orosotof .110 Aso. awl public bt and, der A iEstsosis - House of Cs Committee LAND for dull sapressiy deS seetSilify to but this wan breath in whic young Prince by which idol that very desi the division do votes against I We beg to tisetnent i Sxiety for P Churches and alluded to. T desirous of ob churches, by en ternal arrangen tie spiritual wa are not entitl for building ne for erecting dm tants and upwan the cireumstai Association ; bui serving, 'that th ledge, and the Peer In the Prin fled sassittiousl U abut* Imam is dist ease they In the Tines parse what we pared, viz., that dassmwe distress prassalgated ehis it advisable CO 'call following words :- " Our readers wi site prole,* rate of ariaitiairper sal of - 10113." When we first SR a NAP Spoil oast empress tr dosed that FEIIPI fir tomes t to pay as the value of t Subsequently, in asserted that advi firming. " almost, Issued ou this sul Tines; sod that that titrt•'until ye either in ignorant endeavoured to facts can no It of from the moral forth a document treasury at Madri to " those who are Loan," to peruse the disposed to suffer shuffle Stuff as emit it has incurred. Ls to which it " pledge tion. If it will to convicted falsehood. yesterday, will not ei ;sew Spanish loan a reviously referred, pensive knowledge c The business in the morning, and very 'mil the Bank. The 31onel The deikession in t • eharacter„ and it was -oodles day to-morroa jobbers were occupied i it. Another cause that is the scarcity of money Spanish securities were pervaded the market. those of 1823, ltif. C bier! Bonds; they open. neat 86. Russian stoc declined in the middle rewired. Mexican Scrip discount, New Peruvian count. The prices in the Sha in the Egyptian Trading at 14, 13, 12 premium. The valuable and medals belonging to lickjeety has, with suc the library, was on S to the British Museui r^er 1,300 drawers. The Marquis and A arrived yesterday, at 1 from Malta. Mr. Stratford t'anni on his return from S. The Lord Chancell We brought by the recognivd the rearri ham with Miss Perase l'aper. That etever and fa melt to-night at Dnir We have received J produce of the islanr third deficient of an this morning from I been proclaimed in Cu Accounts from Ma nuar?, represent the soneerover the native and fo have made fo the contest with decisi The property take lam of rupees. Extract of a letter f 'March 13th : "A friend nom C had arrived, and ass treaded, and his crews in the Spaniards can hold ou • time longer." PAITICULARS OF (From the Agents to 'The crew of the larg ' have arrived here in th e ship on Tuesday the 1, gonsequence of her sr lister- The steam-cn, . was rendered useless; h • they left her she was 1' ‘ ...ik arry nd shout w e; 4•C,,.. • , • - IP ~~ 3s fR =