The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1805-08-24 00:00:00

11131 . 11r71.1.114 ,, M1PP ! i f COURT If.4RTIAL. Qop.sTIONILD by TUE PROSECUTOR. _. F INK-settings at a Ctneral Court Martial, hit lat Hun, Ant 2, 1845, I I Atte of a Warrant to Lieutenant General Vest., comminuting His Maje , ty's Forces in the Yorkshire Distrift, for the trial of E , sigi! Dadlc, of the ca Royal Lincoln Mi litia, irpqn A Charge preferred against hint, by Colorist commanding the ad Royal Lincoln Militia. 14t11111ERI Lord Visc.nint CRANLEY, Preiirtent Lieutenant-Colonel Sir David Rae, Royal West Midellese: Major W. Bird, Royal West Middlesex Major Holbetch, lst Warwick Major E. Bayley, Royal West Middlesex Captain J. Taylor, Royal West Middlesex Caputo T Townshend, Ist Warwick Captain N. Binlev, 2d Royal Stirrer Captain E Wtngheid Dickinson, Ist Warwick Captain 2d Royal Surrey Captain C.O. lit Warwick Lieutenant R Cotor, Royal Went Middlesex Lieutsnaot W. Maddock, Royal West Midd.oleit Lieutenant W. Syr/1 , 4)u, lit Warwick Lieutenant S. Rohinurn, Yd Warvrieft. The members being me:, and seated according to seniority, the prisoner and audience admitted, the warrant was riont, empowering Lieut.-Gen. Vyse to assern:At! the Court Martial, together with his order kr that purpose ; also the deputation to Capt. T. W. Vaughan to ael as Deputy .rndge Advocate; the members names were then called over; the prisoner ohjesctin7 to none ; the cnurt was sworn, as well as the Deputy Judge Advocate. The charge was then read : Fix improper awl tingentlereanlike eondinfl, and enhecom. ing ..n officer, in outing latignaye against the Colonel and Lieu teitalt-Coloncl of the regiment, on tlis 14th June, ISO, tend ing to su►vert all order and military discipline. (Signed) N. KING, Commanding the Third Royal Lincoln Militia. To this charge the prisoner pleaded Net Guilty.— Colonel King was then called upon, who produced a paper, which was read and delivered to the Court-, of which the following is a corred copy : Little did I expect, and less could I wish, to have appeared before this Court, in the pro-crution of an officer is ray own regiment. To extenuate the vrmrs of the iinfoitunate, and even to forgive hiding injuries, is a lesson which we are taught by humanity to adopt. But when the character is attacked, not by an avowed end open enemy, brit in a save: and clandestine manner, it would, when discovered, chew a pusillanimity to overlook it, as also a emiseiousnes. of deserving it. If indulgence has the power of creating respect, er the mad leetion of past favours of producing rat node in the heart, very different treatment I might expect to have received_ Should it he urged by Ensign Dadky in his deft nee, that his confinement has been severe, the severity amm from the iniuppliceticas of ithr indulgence unfelt had been granted, fitr, instead of walking Got for his health, whien be 'solicited, he was seen at a place of public retort. The irreguMrity of his conduct justified the act. Ily the or der of the different General. of each garriwm, Ensign D.leey was put underelOse anted. If then, from the evidence r loch I shall produce before the Costa, 1 eau sufficiently establish the charge preferred against him, 1 trust you will do me the Ito. Da;ir lo acknowlege !. re acted from a duty I owe to the gerri:e, as atm for the vindication of tar own character and Conduct. _ Colonel Kin.; then stated to the Court, that on the 14:h ofJune, be heard from Lieutenant Pitchford, that, at Lieutenant Walpole's Lodgings at Beverley, Ensign Willey had used very disrespedful language towards Wood King, the Prosecutor, and the Lie.s tenant-Colonel. calling them two d—d scoundrels ; in cqnsequence of which the Prosecutor sent for En sign Dadiey, .n order to put him under attest, or give him tk I.berty of leaving the regiment. '1 o substant.: !e Ole charge, Colonel King called upon 4.acutunant Thompson, w:to was duly sworn. Q. Were you at Lieutenant Walpole's lodgings, at Beverley, on the 14th of.lune A. I was. Q. Was Ensign Dadley in company with you ? A. He was. Q. D;J you hear him mike use •f any disrespeet ful language against Lieut.-Col. Brackenbury and me ? A I conceive I did Q. Please to state to the Court what that language was ? A. I heard Ensign Dadle; say, that they (i. e. the Colonel and Lieutenant-Colonel) were two scoundrels. CROIIII-ERA MINCD lIV THE PRISONER. Q Have not you, since I have been under arrest, declared to . se*eral cfficers of the regiment, that you never heard me speak disrespedfully of the Colonel or Lieutenant-Colonel, or any other officer in the re giment ? A. Not to the best of my knowledge. • Q. Were you not asked, when you left Mr. Wal pole's quarters, on the 14th of June, what conversa tion had passed there, and by whom were you asked that? A. I was not .; not at that time. Q. Did you not say so at my quarters on the 14th of June, in presence of Captain Preston and Lieute nant Walpole ? A. I said I was asked, but not at that time. Q. Who -mas it that asked you? A. Col. King. Q. Have I ever endeAvomed to excite in your mind s disposition to subvert order and ? A. Not at all. The Court having no farther questions to put, Lieutenant Pitchford was duly sworn; but his evi dence being only hear-say, was obje9ed to by the prisoner, and the objection waS allowed by the Court. LIZUTINAIIt IVIILPOI.2 ani.• SWORN. Questioned by Prosecutor—Was Lieut. Thomp. son At your lodgings on tht 14th ofJuaa last? A. He eras Questioned by the Court—Was Emir' Dadley in company with Mm at that torte t A. Hr was there. Q. Doting the time that Ensign Dadley was these. did you hear him make use of any disrespect ful language against Lieutenant-Colonel Blacken bury and Colot.el King? A. I cannot call to my recollection Lieutenant-Colonel Brackenbury's name or Colonel King's being mentioned in any respea, *wept as to the =star rolls. Q. Will you relate what that conversation was, as In the muster rills? A. To th' best of my recol 109ion, Ensign DaJley said, that probably Colonel Yirg might be in a predicament about the muster /Zs being altered. Q , ,estu‘;r , ,d by the Prosecuto: —Did you never in- Inrin Mr. Pitchford, the that Colni!el Thickettbtry twc t seouttdmHs ? A. I act Sit Questioned by emit—Ha...l that expression been made use of, could it have passed without your. knowledge? A. Possibly it might. ceoss-ax Astiuto Dv raitDitet. O. Do you conceive that the language I used re-I lative to the muster rolh could possibly be con•' strued into peaking disrespeetfully of the Colonel and Lieutenant•CDAnel of the regiment, or an in tention to subvert order and discipline is the service? A. So far as my opini in leads me, I do not. Q. Have I ever endeavoured to excite in your mind a disposition to subvert order and discipline A. sever, to my recollation. Q Since I nave been in arrest, have you not heard Lieut. Thompson declare, that he had never heard me speak disrespeelfttlly either of Colonel King or Liitit. Colonel Brackeubury, or any other officer in the regiment? A. Repeatedly. 'lhe Court having no further questions to ask ; LIEUT. PITCHFORD, WAS AGAIN CALLED, AND DULY SWORN. Questioned by the Prosecutor—Did not Lieut. Walpole inform you, at your lodgings, that some strange conversation had passed on the 14th ef June at Lieut. Walpole's lodgings, at Beverley ? A. He did. Q. Did that conversation tend at all to the muster roll, being altered ? A. I do not recoiled that it did. Questierted by Court—Can you bring it with any precision to voter memory, whether such a conver sation htok piece or not? A. lam positive, to the bet of my recolletlion, that nothing was mentioned respeaing the muster rolls or p a y lists. The Prosecutor hating no further evidence to produce in support of the charge, the prisoner was put upon his defence, when having requested the indulgence of the Court till Monday n , at. to enter upon his defence, from the absence of necessary as sistance, the Court agreed to adjourn till Monday neat. To which time it adjourned accordingly. - - The Court having met pursuant to adjournment, the P:isoner entered on his defence, which be read, and delivered to the Court. The following is a correa copy : "My 1.-. rd President, and G ittlemen ui the Court, " I now appear before you. under a criminal trial, for a supposed verbs/ e 9eeer, after having suffered six %eerie confinement, of unexampled rigour, and attended by every indignity that deliberate disdain could devise, or silent scorn Wild. I humbly trust, however, that these embarrassing and appalling cir cumstances will nut be suffered to operate to my dis advantage in tire minds of any of the Court. lam persuaded that my story cannot be heard at such a tribunal with a cold, or unwilling ear. " Here, at least, I can have no personal indignation to encounter. You, Gentlemen, and I, as, indeed, is absolutely requisite in both our situations, are un known to each other; but I hive already observed enough of the liberal attention, and candid judg ments of the Court, to rest assured, that my defence is ill he impartially estimated. " I believe I may venture to assert, that, through out all the proceedings of British jurisprudence, no instant can be produced, in which any Prisoner has ever before been required, in any Criminal Court of Justice, to answer to a charge so vague and inde finite: and I have good authority to confide incon trovettibly, that I was not bound to answer to a charge so shaped and expressed. " Conscious, however, of innocence, in the strip es' sense, and persuaded that it was not in the power of the Prosecutor to substantiate his charge, in any degree, by evidence ; from the first intimation which I received from the l'rosecutor, of his design, as ex ores ,ed by him in his own statement to the Court, when lie sect fur me, and acquainted me that he slmald immediately put me under an arrest, nr that I should then leave the regiment; I explicitly de sired to know the express language that was charged against me, and declared my earnest wan to be confronted with my accusers ; I disdained to aban don my duty, or to shrink from investigation, and thus to prove myself a recreant and a criminal.— After the excessive, severe, and unexampled re straints, and accumulated indignities, which I have so long endured, upon so flimsy a charge, I was eager to lay before the Court an undisguised narra tion of the whole series of my sufferings, as well as the futility of my alleged offence ; f determined not to shield myself under any legal objedions, and was ea ger _ to meet the Prosecutor on hi s o w n ground. " The crime charged against me is, that of " using disrespeelful language against the Col. and Lieut.-Colonel of the Regiment, tending to subvert all order and discipline." There is this glarin; ab surdity in the charge, that it pretends to ascertain the tendency of the language supposed to have been employed, without ascertaining the language itself. Witnesses were, therefore, to be produced to prove to the Court, that 1 had used language of a certain alarming and dangerous tendency. ft was then a tendency to a crime, which wa., iu fate, proposed to be proved against me. This tendency, however, was positively, and distinctly disproved, by each, and all of the Prosecutor's witnesses, on their sepa rate cross examinations. rr One witness, Lieut. Thonspcon, and only this one, conceived. whilst he was in Court, that on the 14th of June, he heard me apply the single epithet, scoundrels, to the Colonel and Lieutenant-Colonel ; but he did not think proper to state to the Court, what the occasion was, which produced the epithet, or a single syllable of the context of the discourse with which it stood conneded. If the Court cov:ld conceive, with the witness, that such an epithet h a d ever been by me used, without any contest, 01 any cause then exiting to produce it, ao con'Arudion wherever could possibly be put upon ,;it. As it stands in evidence it is pettedly isolate4t salt! nuga tory. At first sight it might appear o.! tremendous import; but, it ss ill be found, upon ticcurate investi gation, to be incapable of any meaning except one purely ironical. It is certain, rk.at the inaccuracy of this witness'- ' his -~ . • other officers of the Regiment e whom T shall ealll' upon as witnesses, 4 ill also praveqbat they nave heard him make the same declaration. " After the view which I have taken of the Prose cutor's e-idence, which does not include the smallest tittle of matter, besides what has been noticed, re levant to the charge, I might safely close my de. fence ; but I feel it a duty incumbent upon me, both as perspnally eggrievod, and as interested in the ex position of excessive cruelty and flagrant injustice, to lay before the Court a statement of the rigours of my arrest and confinement:—Rigours which, I may venture to affirm, without fear of refutation, have never before been equalled in His Majesty's service, under similar circumstances. "A discretionary power, I admit, is invested in the Commanding Officer, both as to the nature and de gree of arrest, under which a prisoner may be placed, pending his trial by a Coutt Martial. That power, however, like all discretionary power, has its limits, beyond which prudence and humanity will nor, and rashness and malevolence, without being liable to the censure of superior authority, cannot, pass. " The abridgment of liberty is, in itself, no incon siderable species of punishment, particularly when agrravated 4y indignities and severity.—The hu mane principles of British jurisprudence, and the praftice of Martial Law, absolutely require, that the duration of restraint, previous to trial, should be as short, and the degree as light, as the circum stances will admit. The British Law positively concludes every man innocent until he is found guilty Ly his peers : we are, therefore, bound to exert every precaution to avoid punishing the inno cent. Widely different has been the tendency of the measures which have been adopted by the Pro secutor, in the present instance. He has evinced no rebid:nee to employ unusual force, and to multiply restraints and indignities against me: he refused to regard the most powerful plea of humanity ; and debarred me of those indulgencies which my wants and my health imperiously claimed. " As tile charge against me was personal, and the injury alleged private and verbal, delicacy might have suggescal mild, and prudence should have for bidden rigorous treatment : but the indignation and resentment of the Prosecutor were not to be regu lated by the standard of the ordinary feelings of mankind, or customary Triodes cf proceeding. is When first the accusation was announced against me, 1 was immediately ordered into dose arrest. In a few days after, when I had obtained liberty to walk out for two hours in a day, I was again con fined to my quarters, on a false pretence of having broken my arrest ; one centinel was placed at the door of my lodging, and another appointed ao fol low me about the interior of my dwelling, and to remain with a drawn bayonet at my chamber by night ; guarding me like a traitot to my country, or a prisoner accused of some mo.: heavy felony : —an indignity to an Officer under no capital charge, which, I believe I may venture to affirm, unparal leled in tyre service. In the whole, it is strikingly apparent, that I must already hamenshired no tri fling punishment, under the moors lend contumely of such a confinement, continued for the space of six weeks. " My Lord, and Gentlemen of the Court, the case which I have stated is no exaggeration. It may doubtless appear extraordinary tomtit of honour and humanity ; but I shall be able to substantiate every fad I have related, by the testimony of ho nourable witnesses ; and produce, if requisite, the most satisfaitory evidence in refutation of the a,per sions attempted to be fixed on my honour and cha rader. s• I beg to offer my acknowledgments of, and to express the grateful sense which I entertain, for the patient and candid attention which I have received from the Court.— I appeal to the hcnour, the jus tice, and the humanity of the Court, for redtess ; as Gentlemen, and as Officers, you will shield me from indignity, and afford the completest lustration of my fame." The Prisoner then called upon Capt. Preston, who Was sworn. Questions from the Prisoner, put by the Junes ADVOCATL Q. Have you at any time, and when, had any conversation with Lieut. Thompson, respeeting the charge exhibited against the Prisoner ?--A. I had conversation with him upon the parade ground, and at other times, respeding the charge. Q. Have you heard him say, whether he ever heard the Prisoner speak disrespalfullY of the Co lonel or Lieut.-Colonel of the Regiment?--A. He has said in my hearing that he never heard him speak disrespeCtfully of the Colonel or Lieut.-Co lonel,or any other officer of the regiment. Q. Did he not inform you of Lis having been summoned as a witness to this Court , and that be knew nothing of the matter ?-..:t. Q. Were you not one of the party at Mr. Wal pole's on the 14th of Jur.e ?--A. I was. Q. Did you hear the Prisoner at that time make use of any disrespeetlul languageagainst the Colonel or Lieut.-Colonel, ?--A. No, I did not. Q. 11 any such language had been used. were you in such ia situation as that you must necessarily have he. it ?—A. Yes, I think I certainly should have heard it. 1-16 w long was I.ieut. Thompson present at Walpole's on the 14th of June?—A. I should ...oppose about half an hour. ' Q. Have you at any time heard the Prisoner use any language, tending to subvert order and dis ciplinel.-.A. Never. Q. Are you frequently in his company ?--A. Yes, very frequently. Q. What is your opinion of the general character of the prisoner, as a gentleman and an officer ? A. I look upon him with the highest esteem, both as a gentleman and as an officer. The prisoner having no further questions to put, the witness was cross-examined by die prosecutor. Q. Did • hear •• 4th June, at Lieut. sir iversation relating to •Id about muster attested, or to introduced ? by me, and the made use of by or Lieutenr tit- Colonel on that occasion ?—A. ny in a smallest degtee. CAPTAII. .MORRIVIN SI , M7( Questions fr o m t h e prisoner, put b ybe Jud ge Advocate. Q. Have you, or have you nnt, at any tirn e heard Lieutenant Thomp son d e . l are , that he nev o heard the prisoner speak disrespectfully of the Col o , nel or Lieut.-C.)l.)nel, or any other (Am) of the regiment ?--A. To the best of my lawn-led ge, , have. Q. Was that since the prisoner has been in arres! —A Yes, it w The prisoner having, ) further q testions to the witness withdrew. Lieutenant Evans, and several other witness es far tLe prisoner, not having arrived, hut ssh un the Court understood ta be on their way fro 71 Beverley, tlte prisoner declined waiting. and closed his defence. The proceedings and sentence have been sent tfp t o be laid before His Majesty, but the final resuit not yet known. SMITHFIELD, rat _ To 'Sok the Oftsi. left 3s LI to 4. 64 I Muswo ,44 OA to 4s SW I Lamb Newt of cif Rea -t,, about tell--nl 1 4 / J ~ r 1~ . ~1 1 Inrin Mr. Pitch - ford, the Paymaster, that a strange Of this witness's conception wi'Mst in Court, or his Q. Did you hear on the 14th Ju n e conversation had taken place, on the 14th of June, want of memory when out rrf it, has rendered his Walpole's lodgings, any conversation at your lodgings, and that you (the witness) did not testimony in the present irfaitauce, altogether un- me ?—A. There was something said ab those to enter into it ? A. I never mentioned er•rds worthy to be depended up / On in Any criruinal Court rolls being altered, after they were aft th Mr. Pitchford to that effea ; or more than that of Justice. :hat circa ; that is all I recoiled. ielatiyptts-afteda.iser , :r-rolls being altered, which, I "It has already yri positively proved to the QUESTIONS BY costar. • .in the co . urse or Q. By wliona was that conversation i the evidence for the prosettt- . • !i 2.. ... Nord by the Court, to which Lion, that the saltness/ Lieut. Thompson, has repeat- —A. lam almost persuaded it WAS by n • i.' wi g , . . ..?....ren-0 did /peak to that effra. edly declared, that, rf . 4 5i0..... he never heard me sneak disre- sut.jea was mentioned by Mr. Dadley. •-• I. .. est:l,4 % 4r Proiraltor- I;id yet; not hear En- Tectiully eitLr of the Colonel or Lit tr-Colo.: , 1, , r Q. Was any disrespedful phrase ma Aiwa ~.:t i ti to r •-• 1' . Alf cal me and Lieutenant-Lieutenant-dlay other °dicer 'of the Regiment.' l'i...it or live EsOga Dodley, avian flee Colonel o r , .. ....„,/ • .., ...-- —.- IP . A I - -_ . -- - ly e me Vrr )10. the 1 v.! fo t , mrt the t ce. 1 to t ich .43 sal T lre :en of gh .nt, Pt- is. t! o of .ips Amy rcis kvs +no .bM xw 4 . d. Cd. del los le 14 14 us 10 NAV.IL INTELLIGENCE. Arrived the Camide frigate from a cruse, w; .I! the French brig to Freine, of 16 guns (.int: of i! squadron which captured the Manche frir,.ite), whi t , she captured on the I sth mist iii lat. 45 deg. 18 nk. long. 7 deg. 96 min. in company with the Gai43 man of war. PLYMOUTH, AUGUST 11. Arrived, the Ritpi 1, C4mrl4, Insolent, and Relt. lestion4i,e frigate, with dispatches from Admiral Cornwallis ; and the Trio, Brown, fiorn Dantsic. By the Readerionaire, arrived this day, after . remarkably <rie:k run from the Fleet off Brest, we learn, that Admiral Sir R. Calder had been di:- patched to his old station off Ferrol, with ten sai: of the line, and that a reinforcement of eighteen wore shortly followed. The 1.1, fell in with twenty-eight or thirty sail of the hew a nising off Ferrol, and was fortunata enough to be to windward of them, by which means she n.a , rowly effeeled her escape. Sir R. Calder, when joined by the reinforcvnent, will have all Admiral Lord Nelson's ships (except ing those arrived in port), together w ' th twe::ty s..ii of good conditioned ships from Admiral Cor ima pi c , amounting, in the whole, to twenty-eight sail of t! line. DRAT., •CATcR 1 ,2?, Wild to ji,in the squadron under consuiaail of Admiral Russell, off the Te::el, His Majesty's ships Aginc. , ort And Dictator; also severel homessaul, bound vessels for the River. CURN-EXCHANUF, rill DAT. At cast 2-i. .1 \ Th4' , Ores of Whom nu I dis case ~t.O Iy large, twine. ;why foreign i and to-day low sat -s ai a rffeB.,l to thaw umy in immediate cant, at a reduction of ab. ut quay rr .irca Monday. Barley, with Malt, are all. nod uns.ilratlr, at k', 'rhere is a rcit dii.n.ws thr sail of Pol. an al Roam of each ort, and eit.3iref. WC have Oars nt cleisiderabla quantities; this art.ele m also very Keay id ale, and ;wires giv, way. 'loin it 2t and 36. per sack hover,atad, with Whilst, expected at (Luther reductairt. CURRENT PRICE OF GRAIN. Wheat . 4lta Ge 84.. 4000.../4. Ut Re-... 45. SO+. 04 Barley Malt .74. 80. 04 Whoa Peat.... Otis. 54. Od Gr.v 4O. 454. 04. PRICES Uf HAI Tistai lIT. I A MM.'S. Bean. 44. !A , 0 1 . Tick heats 46• I /am 444 28. :;2t.0 35. I. Rape 5ced...... 64!. Fine 714. ed. 7k..44 Hair 5l a 51 04 New Ol us a 01 0 4 Clover, 04 Os a 01 0. StrAw 21 144 • Si G. AND STRAW. ,DAT. IrN !TIMM ktet. Hay. 31 Ws ■ 1 1 1 1 4 Clover 41 4. a 3 , V Sim.. 2l 13s a aye chtio 41 4. ■ of Li 10AV, Auctr,yr —p e r Swale ‘.l alb I V... 11 —4, co to 5. Ik ..4s L., 4s $4 ds. I,d. to is. ed. ttld this .v, iteep and Lambe, 7,000. NEWGATE ANT) I.EADENIf M %iti:crs Rv the Cal.:34e. Beef 3s to 4s 0. I Veld . 344t0 &4 Mutton 64 to 44 2d Vort 04 to 1.4.014 4 . (M. VI M. 14. 11.01TINOS OF CIIVOITORS AT GUILDHALL. on AAAAA ir. u. R. Harry Elderton, nnw °ado of !instal. neossi,cri- Yeller. - . - . . 10 John Leakin. Worcester.stre •t, Southwark. Surrey. min -weight - . . . . . 1. , 9 • PRICE OF STOCKS. YESTLIWAY. NAnk Stock 3 per Cent Reduced k4j 591 O 9 3 per Cent. Consols . 4 pet Cont. ... i .. 76;i S per Cent. Navy iwil i per Ccnt. Loyalty. Long Annuities . l7 1.1 t Short Annuities.... Imperial 3 per Cent ',i n t Ditto Annuities V 3 161 Omniurn , India Stuck . —179, South Sea Steck Engler!) Lottery Tickets Consols f0r... T. BISII, Stock Orr.M.N t No. 4, Cotirhill„ •01 %Chain, cream COURSE OF EXCHANGE. rat Dia. Ava 2). Amsterdam .... .36 2 I'.l V trim. 62 Ditto at Sight .. 37 9 Listuns GO Rotterdain.......lt 19 2 U. I OpOrto 2l Hamburgh 95 5 till Itntil.n . IA A:tons 95 6 tilt. Cock 14 i Paris Mini 2Us Ca.lis MaArid Hiltons Init.+, n Naples Genoa 1/tib'in on London ( 11. ‘ 1 1g 9 :: ) .4 .1""*" th(e.eft":." "I : l'n4 11•Afast on London 4.11. g. 9) 7# lisdiao 011 Da , :lin r hurt.) ...J.. 5 1 661 Aa r. • ___......... ......_ THUS DA Y noon after 111, -n....D1 nu n. a-, •r 1 DEA if IN Mift Miller, late of Druty•i. e T•itratre; a Irt.uri Ladc v!itue,aritl eisollnes.eiiileared her to .II ehq knew h Captain Henry tsorlield y h.. fril at the )1...1 of th.) ICt regiment, at the last a .cult wn Illtsertt.e... Ilew or the e.thil. cid )iitiiiicest tun of IVitliam Ciorfield, of Tiont.."• LONDON :—Pr.tited ly OF:OVit DAVIDSON. N. , . S. Wy.ll..treet. Qt. Clentesi's. and P•tbaalted by 3( rs.AD RYDER. at the Orhce. Nat. 13, Sae! Of • S ram'. where Ordzra RN tits Popo, *c. (Pods. tov i i M lit be July attended to.