The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1810-03-03 00:00:00

43444 ter tette Itt'tive - rturill ear, and siltich retched same tithes. *AA beadly called for by those torho Mt for the injustire dour to their rountry by • oseasitre as unconstitutional, sail an iutention vs depraved ? lie beg;cil leave to ask, whether, if latch tiarrattee had been before the Administra tient, they would ant give Sir Richard Strachan au opportouity of ettelpatitig himself .The Lord., tiff the Admiralty thought it a duty imperious tEptin thole to do se. The Noble Earl then depre cated the conduct of a man who would mad him self of the confidence reposed in him by his Sove reign, and said, that such an abuse was a high po litical misdetneauour. No person could quesitou the right of Governraeut to inquire into the cir carnstaoces which produced the late failure; dis patches, and volumes of papers had been pro:lured; yet, still, more had lurked behind, bud they were at length produced, but under circumstances of such peculiar aggravation as called for a most eraphatical iuquiry. The Noble Earl concluded by observing. that there never was a more serious subject before their Lordships, and urged the ne cessity of such information as the motiou would de mead. LOrd MVLSItvs said, that he conceived it new cowry to state to His 'Majesty, that no necessity oxistea foe instituting an inquiry into the conduct of the late Expedition. He was inclined to con yeive, from the dispatches he had received concern ing the Commanders, that such inquiry would be superfluous. If the narrative had been before him, he would have advised a different mode of conduct. He bad no conception that attacks should have been levelled at the navy, for the purpose of screening the military from imputation. After many other observationa l he concluded by assuring their Lord ships, that he did oet know any thing . respecting the narrative of Lord Chatham, until it had been produced before the House of Commons. The Earl of DARN Lay—Shall Ministers come forward and tell us, that His Majesty's Ministers bad so little confidence iu each other, although eon• ferringdailr. that one of them should have kept from his colleagues the tact of his having delivered a narrative to the Sovereign? Could their Lord chips believe the fact, that the Noble. Lord, at the head of the Admiralty, did not know there was a difference existing between the military and navel Coolinanders, on the late unfortunate expetlitioo to the Scheldt ? It was his rest anti sinc,re opinion, there never was such a disgraceful one sent out of elm country. 'Whatever brought shout the re-. moral of His Majesty's peeseat weak, imbecile, in competent, and rich adminietration. was justifiable; they had fattened them elves upon reversions •tatl siescores, and were perfcctly incapable of dirt cling His Majesty's mopeds; and, being without strength et foremicht, ought to be done away with. It was his positive °manna, that if their Lordship, hod any regard for the prosperity of the country, the untiea of the Noble Marquis should be :w -eeded to. Lord Gamiest., to -sr" Me Lords, you sill not be eta rrised that I should differ in opinion from the Holds Lard at the head of the Admiralty. That Iloilo Lord use called forward to state, in a manly 1111•11111.06 that he was not the person that advised Hie Illifeaty to give the answer which was returned tote City of London; yet he avowed it was done with his knowledge, approbation, and advice, But, my Leeds, he has avowed, if lie had known of the seutiments expressed in his colleague, Lord Chatham's Narrative, which was delivered by him to His nlajesty in secret, he would not have ad vised the &tower. I rejuice, toy Lords, in the con- Maki 11 but the arguments of the Noble Secretary . of State (Earl of Liverpool), are quite different; he, although now is full possession of the facts of the Noble Earl of Chadian% still asserts that the an swer was such as the first city in the empire ought to bare received..--( Hear !—Althongh it had beers a paper which threw an odium on the nury, at lewd" on the naval Coinmauder, the head of that department bad not thought proper to no tice it- But Lord Gambier was brought to a Court-Martial, on the dissent of an inferior officer. I cautrot sap if the conduct of His Majesty's Ministers is justifiable, but his Lordship has been ill need ; for a narrative has been delivered to the King fikr his private periossl, and is now before the World, accusing Sir R. Strachan of misconduct, on the late melancholy Expedition, yit lie has not been brought to a Court-Martial. I have lint a doubt but he will demand one; for. 1 um confident, there is not ass Officer in the military or !rival ser vice that, where a doubt arose of their conduct, that would 'kit demand it. But even Lord Gam- bier has brut ill-used ; for he via not allowed the choice of demanding it. What apology could the Nobly Lord rt the head of the Admiralty have fot not proceeding in the same way, in the present internee ? Hr acknowledged that he was in habits of conversing with the Noble Earl, who trunnoanded the military pitt of the Expedition, daily, and had made every inquiry into the Expedi tion; yet hr advised Ilia Majesty to answer, there was t►ut r cause for inquiry. My Lords, 1 contrud there is blame to be attached somewhere ; and, if the Noble Lord at the head of the Admiralty lead that tolo►nsation which he ought to hive had, he would not have given the advice he did; yet, when. knowing that the department which he was attached to was attacked and censured, he did not call upon Sir Richard Strrehan for his narrative. What I com plain of, my I.nrJs, iv, that His Majesty's Ministers acknowledge their perfect ignorance, whether there was Maine to he attached or not, when they pre stimptuorisly and unwisely advised the answer. In the dry dispatches it appeared that some blame was attached to the Commander-in-Chief of the ex pedition—slHear 0--My Lords, I will repeat my words, for there appeared more larastie, dry, or gua►ded dispatches in any Gazette ever pabli-had in this kingdom, than tl►ose of the Ertl of Chat ham—/Hear! heir!) Ile wits allowei after ward, to remain, by the aeknowl olgthent of the Nohle Secretary, after his arrival in this country, during the inuoit • hs of September, October, nod even likreisolser, before his Noble colleagues in °thee thought it proper to inquire even into the rouse of th e Lawrie of this nufortunatt• Expedition, which hail exhausted more lives and money than any that had ever sailed ;;um its shores. A mouth was taken up dui , l:: that "II the opinion of every tart own, tut., ! :6l not liav• rxrr , (l.4l three data ; 014 Illitill0141,, ; 11 ti.iret.nv of Sinte 1):611 1 :.11 th- 411, down I , v tie; Cabinet were deputed from in the first itistavice, yet their Lordships and u.e city of London were gravely tohl there was no cause for in quiry. I congratulate the Noble Secretary of State on the martial air which he a•sumed on his first risirtz, and ou the pride with which he con fe-sed he advised Hi, Majesty to give the answer, followed with a dry sarcasm, that it was not the practice of his Lordship, or those he acted with, to sacrifice a Commander of an army, to throw the responsibility from off themselves, I say. my Lords. the reverse has been the case ; for if I take into any contemplation the whole powers and administrations of Europe, I cannot find an in stance of the kind except that practised by them selves, in the case of the gallant, much-lamented, and ill-used Sir J.Moore.—(Hear ,'—This is an in controvertible fact, thst ne persou can refute. Did they not try to remove the weight oW their own shoul dera.by slandering the memory of him who fell glori ously at the battle of Corrumia, defeuiling to the lust the glory of his couutry, entrapped and ensnared as he was by their ill-digested plans? If belied survived, to have reached the shores of his native country, they who have so much calumniated him would have appeared the culprits.—(Hear ! hear 'l— l do not believe there is LI man of common understanding out side of your Lordships' walls. that does not believe that he and the chief pact of the army which he so ably commanded, fell as martyrs to the ill digested plans of His Majesty's then Administra tion. This subject requires more animadversion, my Lords, than at this hour of the night I am in clined to- give; but I cannot pass over some re marls of the Noble Lords opposite. The one at the Admiralty says, this motion hes given him great inconvenience; his inconvenience SS !LS liglit, indeed t but the shock the constitution bad received, was dreadffil ; 'the vital roots of it were struck, and had received en injury, which nothing but the vote of their Lordships could redeem. Did the Noble Lord consider that the poisonous narrative not only brought charges against Naval Commanders, who every dry risked their lives in the service of the country, but against himself, as being at the heed of that department ? (Hear !) We have only the verbal answer of His Majesty's Ministers, that they were all privy to the answer given to the city of London. is that sufficient ? Will your Lordships be satisfied. wilthont an official answer ? (Hear !J Is it necessary this paper should have been deliver ed and continued in His Majesty's possession a whole month, with the knowledge of the responsi ble part of the Administration ? Good God, my Lords, is it nothing, that the ear of the Sovereign should be poisqeed against that force, which, from -ti:e natural situation of this kingdom, is nor best defence ? (Hear ! hear!) Is it not dangerous, in Pact, re 'At set of 'ten could, nay, wosl.l in ike thew elves ri-ponsihle for the acts of Governmeet, to ii there were another set behind the curtail', emlet.ering the royal mind against their measures ? My Lords, it is the first time such a proceeding liar been dien:lmed to Parliament, al though the practice has lung existed ; let your Lurd,lrips prove your detestation or it, by voting fur the address prope.ed be the Noble Marquis." Their Lordships then divided, when there ap peared, 41 49 - 90 70 66 -136 Coutesits. Psuxies . Nllll-rolltrOtS PIUICieS Majority against it.. Addrtaa 46 Adjuurned, at liAl.l-P4ST rwct.va, till Moodily. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Upon the motion of Sir RooEnT P►ot., the report •f the Glangurt Cuounitter, declaring Alexa•der Holman, FAq duly elected, was brought up, and uriltred to lie oo table. A new writ was issued for the Borough of New Wood stock. in the roots of t►e Honourable Williams Elliot Etleu, deceasrd Sir THOMAS TURTON nutted (w leave to bring in a Bill to eua►le the Managers of the Royal Circus to give cat talo numerical fteprtmeulations.—Leave given Lord Cot . moved for copies of the oaths adminis tered to the ilesslacts of Courts-Martial, and to lb. Lurd- Adrueute. After sum, obeeeratioes from Mr. Pereeval, Mr. Crokrr, Mr. Harvey, and Mr. Ruse, the motiou was segativeit with out Mr Enwnear Kgsecutot.r. resented • petition ficin the Inubuldtra of the county of Krut, requesting (miller allowance fur the soldiers quartered %liana thent.—Otdeted to lieoar the taste. AN account of the duties oo apirita in Irelattd, was brought up, and ord. led to lie oil the Sable. Mr. ['mann mowed, •• That a Committee be appointed to inquire into the slate of the roods between Shrewsbury ■nd Holyhead, and also between Chester and Hoiyheod."-- Ibe motion was agreed to, and the Committee appointed. General Feue.usi.no presented a petition from the Linen an., Onto* ilianufsetureis of the county of Fife, praying for a drawback of the duty us brimstone. The Hon. Slernber assured the House, that, in preteuting this petition, he was influenced I. 1141 **a field tehaideration.—.4he petition was ordeal to lie on the lade. Mr. Gill ATT A v moved for Irate In bring In a Dill to re lieve the lowly...sit Debtors to Ireland —.Leave giv►n. Mr. Tlt.av EY moved fur a ktter front the Inepector of Howdah' to the Secretary at War, dated July is, taw) -• Ordered. 81:CRET INFLUENCE. Mr. 11 TBREA DT n promised mo tion upon the subject of the Earl of Chatham's Evidence, sand of His Majesty's Answer to the Ad dress, sad, it was now seven slays since Ise had sub • led to the Houses proposition, founded upon a suspicion of unconstitutional conduct, upon the part of ass officer employed is the 'Scheldt Expeess Soil. His endeavours, upon that occasion, were, to the real honour of the House, crowned wills sue• Cr Sl. An Adslreos had been presented to His Ma• j• sty, in consequence, applying for the narrative or memorial, supposed to have been in his possession. Asir!, upon the Answer to that Address, he founded his present motion. He would trprat, that the I louse had done itself immortal honour upon that occasion. It had performed an act, upon whirls future ages would look back with gratitude and spolausc ; and which, they mu•st themselves reflect upon with pride and approllalose. Thee had per. formsd nu act, which must redound to the honour attic country at lar , ze, and redeem the character of that House, in the cesimation of mankind in gene ral. It was probably in the recollection of Mem. Isers, that, upon sorstioning his Lord.hip as to the narrative, st was contended by Ministers, that it might contain mune private matters, tit only for the Sovereign ear to understand, too delicate sand subtle fur the inspection of au House of Commons. Upon the other liana, it was', Manned, that they had a right to put au) tiuestiour and this right lee would spin, mid tnr evoi insist, they had, bounded certainly by ti J11(11141041 discretion, which it became them to consult upon all occasions. They would probably remember also that the Chancellor of the Exchequer sta ted, that what they 'wanted might be come at by an Address ; but such wile the consistency and tea:- dour of the Right Hon. Ge..t. that %hell his recton mendatiou was adopted, and the Address moved, he exerted the utmost of his ineffectual porter to resist and defeat it, The Mame, testa eltst ;tid ing, was successful, and the Address was veled.— Such were the circumstances under ,l if! II they thought proper to concur with him at these itcried. But how different was the case at pre-cut, they now were in possession of the fact which they only con jectured then ; they now knee a hat then they hod but suspected. They knew that Jahn Earl of Chatham had committed an act impiorr and un constitutional ; that he had approached the Throne as a favourite, acid 414 a minion; and, forgetting Ins own high situation, furgetting the respect which lee owed to his rank and character, bad coedit. ted himself in a manner, which that House of Cotu mons must notice a ith indignation, aversion, and contempt. if it 141 been tier case of an onlinary witness, he would not huge troubled them with the present motion ; for the question in that case must have been long ago decided, it ' an ordinary witness had been guilty of such inconsisuticies. If, on a comparison of what he had raid tipoti one day, with what he had said upon another, they Intimd that there was equivocation, prevarication, or contra diction, in his teatimony, he would have been treated as lie deserved. Equal justice should be done; but his Lordship had the protection of Peer age, and was nu ordinary witness. The resolution which he should propose, would upply to the con stitutional part of the question. It api.eared, that John Earl of Chieham did, on the lath of Janua ry, without consulting any of his colleagues, make use of his privilege, as a Cabinet Nlinister, to com municate a narrative to the King, upon the subject of the Scheldt Expedition ; that this narrative im plicated the conduct of another Officer in n serious manner, and was requested to be kept back for the present—which present, however, extended from the leth'of January to the 7th of February.— The reasons stated by his Lordship for this pro ceeding, whets questioned in the Committee, were so different, at different times, that it was impos sible to discover what they acre. Ile allowed that lie withdrew the narrative afterwards, and that his reason for so (Whig wee, to cease a paragraph, the substance of which lie would not disclose. It was on the 7th of February that he withdrew it' for this purpose, and upon the loth of the same month he tendered it to Ilia Majesty again. He tendered, according to his own phrase, • narrative to the King, which implicated the Naval Commatwler, with whom he acted, no less than twelve limes, and withdrew a paragruple containing a matter of opi nion, which he would not explain. What was to be inferred from this, but that that paragraph, which be so refused to explain, was au addif I slur upon the abused individual who had had the m sforttitte to act in concert with him ? But the narrative,feven in its amended state, was not read to the King ; no, it wits tearfered to him ; and from him com municated to the Ministers of the Crown. Was not this unconstitutional ? Was not this a dangerous precedent at all times, particularly now ? The present Monarch, during his long reign, was, per leaps, more beloved, thou ever Monarch was be fore ; but that he was loved, he owed to his own virtues; and whatever evils were cape ricnced under his Government, were chargeable upon his serv ants. Evils, alas ! had been esperieaced, and they were not without authority as to their source. They had the word of the great William. Earl of Chat barn, the father of the person whom he now stood forward to accuse. That great and distinguished character, whose talents, virtue., and principles, had earned for him a title, inure splendid than un ited Kings could have bestowed, the title of The Great Commoner ;" that character, whose fame had extended to all quarters, and who, before he descended into the Peerage, had earned for himself a dignity, which the Peerage could not confer ; that great character had said, that he was deprived of power by a secret influeuce ; lie had com plained that the ground was rotten under his feet; and yet, fur a repetition of that very senti ments there was a person now in gaol, punished with the loss of his personal liberty. Such was the progressive nature of' secret influence, that it could not he complained of, in the present day, with impunity. What was before problematical. was now clear ; it was found that the secret in fluence, against wlnch the great Lord Chatham re monstrated, did mint, and, by tt strange fatality, existed at present in the person of his son. A secret adviser, a hidden disposer, a myaterious something, was always suspected. When :Ministers came to act, they found themselves rounteructed, but 'weer until now teas it so clearly mid unequivocally ex posed to the country and to the world. Ile did not attach any blame to His Majesty, who had been deceived by the counsels of others, but he thought it was high time that his eyes should be opened to the nature of the mistake, that he should be told that the British Constitution knew of no adviser, but the ostensible Ministers of the Crown, who were responsible to the people for the advice they offered. But this was not all ; Lord Chatham had not simply offended against the ptiticiples of the constitution ; he had also attempted to stir up an opposition between the naval and mi litary forces, which had been heretofore to united, which, in the whole course of this long and dis astrous war, had never been hoard to complain of each other. but at rose to communieste, respec tively, the glory of which each was ambitious. Lord Chatham, it was true, had praised Sir R. Strachan, in his dispatches ; he had praised the fleet under Isis command ; but, afterwards, he insinuated to the disadvantage of both, in it manner the most disingenuous; he tendered his narrative at a time whoa no inquiry was intended by ;Ministers, though imptiry had been since wrung from them by the House of Commons ; he proceeded darkly and secretly to stab the Constitution, to stab the reputation of Sir Richard Strechan, mid the fame of the Navy of Greet Britain. at a time when he hoped that no discovery could he made, and nn detection hazarded. Oct what dal lee ray nh; n qttettionetl upon this subject ? (1, ti ll he bad prese-ettleit it. merely fir:',to lie Leve• -dry ; hut, swim, e n 1., ja^t " further, he laid ; that it w:is Ili I 911,,e, "' 11131 , liatrilfar Of Sir lel lard Si uctitch., ilna own :Mould i l,Sirou% that Ids ioppcia ast should zip ' ea . that !. I* did Itr d t sure to effect it ? did he cone, ri lii 74 ", i n St• - achtio fur th .t ptifpo, k i ,ew that Si, Richard Strac:i.a u „„: il l; • fur u mat rat e, um!, know lug I hut, I t, - (. 1 " II CM the 15th of .I..ittlart, lit un illipt•iir at the same time with on e % ,,,,,i ; nut have exiatetril. On being knew if Sir Richard Struchun had prt'ie:t"ivir„ ratite at that tune? he answe re d, that he . I . f u :o . r i l o :i i i:s s i i , l:l , ;:f :t . i iis l3 l : l : , l: ; ;l : t e e: s l r . i e: It he ie t: t i o l : at i k i t he Itad 1W i „ trution, all this, alter the twelve differein made, should he be untlionsed to thrl r oi I- .6 ' his firebrands in sport? %%lintel-yr his intemc at have been with respect to tie urine .'n.inq.! hod effect was likely to ensue ; IS planted, they would continue to net concert et before this nufurtumete rem the b•-netit of their country, and the ailis u i;', I their fellow-saki nets. cts. upoloiii-eil for tie.r . , Mg so lung upon the time of the Il an* . ' was anxious for the success of Ins iteition• hr y in every fibre of his frame it was not . 11 anxiety, it was an unxi• ty that the (hone shun act, as became it, upon it great an t tent entistitational question. mac tliat titre detected the secret influence, and *ern thsi ti as actually done, which, before, thee only sum o eel to have been dour, and did not ;Joe: to re , 1 tend it, they would act a part imutuastent ui their former conduct ; but if Ore co.curreil si kiln in expressing their sense of ;ts improarie they would odd another wreath to th e g l or y l a, for Mer day. No Parliament, however email have acquitted itself in n manne: nir , :e v. formable to the true si.it it of the nerveinn i-a that had done upon the i ccasion which he n implored it to imitate. Ile concluded with IL6I I Resolutions to the follnwing effect : That it appeared to the Huse, that .lad r, Chatham, haring maltreated kart. of {las 11,3•5 a% 1 , . pie, a Narrative respecting else Expeditioo to the on the lath of January last, transmit it to ;,,', That he withheld all Lane kge of it from Hie Mai 7 . . misters, suit from the Natal Commander wbss,:co.: seriously implicated . That, on the tutu . mi bias own request, re:tarot-it to him for the poi • pressing's paracraph That, on the isth of I /moan-, preseuted to His Majesty again, that paragraph,•huil a matter of tiphaioo, bring erased, but the sub.i.e..• which the Home wit usable to ucestaim That i!, John, Earl of Chatham, by such conduct, was grins uurnmailitlional act, %Inch the flume felt it to be n.• to reprehend." Mr. Ps:acts - AL begged leave to set hiunelf with the llouse, after the naisrepresetituniai s had been mad, of his conduct upon a f , gotn.r The Hon. Gentleman had stated that the tole the flouNe upon that occuaiou had done it lain tal honour, having established a great eret• , ; tional principle; but accused him (Mr. Pere i. of inconsistency. It was true he hail raid Privy Counsellor, having Waken an lath t^ t effect, shouhl not reveal any of Ills Nlajtstv . s croft', without special permission. and h”rt 11:at affected by the vote of the other night he rihl t know. He had stated, that if there ii i, soy eel which they wished to discover. the best attar coming at it was by an Address, and that ii an Address was voted, he would advise ll,s \Jar to agree to it. But how did such a dirt r.e exclude him from the right 0111,0. e the lion. The Hon. Gentleman had said. it , v , s a right, but should be exercised with discrete , : How then could he blame hint (Nit. I'rrr who, rectsguisiog the right, was poi* exercise the discretion. Ile did question it in instauce. Ile thought that was not an ic sion upon which the right should be enforced. admitted the competency, but denied the i diency. Having set hitnielf ots right that poi'. would now proceed to notice the unitive. If former vote consigned the House to immortal the present, he thought, was little calculated to to its honours. Ile hoped, that when pen honour and character were concerned, they a' adopt more caution, and allow more time ii, it Idnhourable Gentleman seemed indict d to ea. the early part of yesterday he had gii en to ti motion, respecting the evidence of Lord t ; ham, and His Majesty's acswer to the Ada upon hearing of it, lie (Mr. Perceval,) a• whether he could think it tight to bring filv such a motion, until the evidence op , . prniti 'llse answer he received. was, that if the ( ell. wits not printed that day, he would not hi iii forward. Another Gentleman, it teas true, afterwards said othenvise ; hot with what to , would ark was the evidence lona , d. anti 'tl "" confidence did many of the Alembers t selves from the Inquiry ? was it not upon tie r: deuce that no decision would he taken aunt papers, necessary to that dist:melan, were priet The Hon. Gentleman himself sectocil so c ome: of this, that he said lie a ould put the e..tilnecc tirely out of the question. lint lona dal lit h! , out of the question ? did he nut make it the pu of inflammatory declamation, and a Gull Oil I. it creditable to their proceedings if they consign an individual to opprohriUto because that individual happens II to in and polities from the Hon. ( 'lent. oppoite : sure lie that the reputation of the Ncble I .^rd. standing that misfortune, was as dear to the as that of any other indtvicloal, for the rIA-P , '' of all were equally protected o w e. Uut could be the advantage of deciding this upon Friday, rather than upon Nlorolar ? was: better, even for the appearance defer it to et late day, if there was 1,0 ,ilaq quence than prcjudning Lord Cliattpiti, 1 ,, a • teral way ? wits it not a proceeding, that sl avoided ? What he pritytd tar, w'4 4 they might have an opportunity t,O their vote. The Hun. Gentl..m.to had ch• , that his evidence of the t3il and tlie 27th, v , •e *nested, page by page ; were the I 0 :-•'" to say, that there was any man ple:erl• i . • Rinke tie contrast so insisted oil. Inch of the critnllialitv of Lad li. " dn,t, inogt depontl tspo.l the motr , v ttpin•ind to {rive hezn ino.trnce ,l I' (Li [l4 10E4 10 41 11, 1,0 t 3131 1 the , t th d ie voliret lof a IZ 1, 1 Of the " see was :er to cot thing I• Ile W ' which site. of tile his pit nob 1.. C' AVOID v,sit it L' n.orrat LI it shook a4r u f 311e0r hilt,:. hr 0 1).ery sk...s!:ottle 1 an Ex shnbi, of the itripnr• 'roe. ry o l d Maitre tiYl it that h u &or it nit add, t foto 111141 411 snafu .beers hot, tI it 1 think ~ s.) COI wider .f tiley In., • next. Chat! twreli sUppo riper Covet .•, inqui ta...r Ole 5.4 :tient twu Id •itte, 1 is tide tr the ••: ttg tr WM' • Al t.ll ! , 4%e th..! In In . nith 00 II 1. lONCI lAA annl' 11:` , an i v If •!1,1 thley Oi I OM 44: Olzht Le iv, ;me lit, ; ; to la n al 14.0: OCL'a• t.nti d. lit Ht I ;4;t, I.r t6',;•• If !h. or:. Irt;1 Iltri deot to to',l Ile tt, en. ha h t , a tas h : u•L'l few rel Al 'i;:tt ,' t'Art rAltitt , Cnrt ;1107 ,! h. 10• it, awl t• • •t' t • In C (~ 7 - - ail I , It la - due n.en•ox hot tcs et • snit. t . • . p,• •. If 1,1 su'. l,- I :14 A 1 - • n se:e 's? .II; .•I Ifs 1 • [it"' • • 1 11 ts; •-t ore.; - l y " i I , 41,‘ c11.• 1 , . • • .1