The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1826-03-15 00:00:00

% c ation. Was there no ittoonvenience then from clipping, ae.? T rcu evils rid not arise in the present circumstances, because the c. ion of sovereigns was too small to render such practices ad vantageous ; but his Lordship could recollect when • main had tour de tive.guineas in his pocket, on weighing there it *IA rarely found that all of them were good. He could remember when the change front a metallic to a paper currency took place, it was • general remark how much more convenient the one pound notes were than the guineas. The notes of local banks, as proposed, were not liable to the same objections in respect of forgery as those of the Hank of England. He well remembered, ton, the frequent instances of robberies, which were encouraged by the metallic sys tem. These had been rendered far less frequent in consemience of the introduction of notes, which were numbered, which often bore the names of the owners, and served, themselves, as evidence to convict the criminal. Their Lordships had only to look at the papers on their table to see what were the opinions of one portion of 'the people on the subject. It was evident, front the description of the persons who presented these petitions, that the system did not in their case uphold commercial speculation. They were principally in the agricultural interest, in the support of which a great part of the issues of one pound notes had been matte. The paper currency possessed a power of reciprocal contraction and expansion, accord. ling to exigencies of the times, which a metallic currency could not possess. He (the Earl of C.) would ask where was the nation which had made such rapid advances, such real and solid additions to her wealth and prosperity, as England had done during the period or her paper currency ? With that view of the subject, and con sidering that the measure before their Lordships was wholly uncalled for, he would move that the 11111 be read that day six months. The Earl of DARN LEY said that he thought it necessary to offer few observations. In the first place he could not agree with his Noble Friend who had just sat down, that the proposed measure could have any evil effect on the poorer classes of the community ; on the contrary,' to considered that it would be most beneficial to their Interests. inasmuch as it would protect them from the loss and distress which arose fromabe failure of country basks. The first du'y of a Government was to protect the poor and labouring cl . of society ; and thinking the !erasure before their ',old ships would have that effect, he should give it his support. 11, on the &her hand, he thought that it would have the effect of throwing the labouring or manufacturing classes of society out of employ, rhea he should have voted with his Noble Friend. Then, with respect to the established currency of London ■nd its neighbourhood, which had been alluded to by his Noble Friend (Lord Carna►ron), who had said that he had not been at tacked by highwaymen and footpads, and that because of the na ture of the currency, his Noble Friend had entirely overlooked the cffeumstance that for some years back their Lordships had tra veil'd with sovereigns in their pockets instead of guineas. But this he (Lord Darnley) considered to have arisen front the improved state of the police rather than from the cause alluded to by his No. ble friend. He trusted his Majesty's fflinisters would do their shay by protecting the interests of the poor. Ilia Lordship said lie alshed to make • few observations in respect to what had fallen from his Noble Friend (Lord Limerick) on presenting a petit ion that day to the House. Ile would ask his Noble Friend if he did not recollect the great distress which had occurred in Ireland in the year 1820 or 1821 (he did not recollect which) from the failure of banks in Ireland He would also ask him if the late failures in the south of Ireland also had not produced similar effects ? Ile (Lord Darnley) had seen lettersfrom that part of the country, which de scribed the misery and distress which those failures had occasioned, and they stated that in many instances the poor were actually dying •'mm want, arising from the loss they had sustained by the banks in question. Their Lordships would recollect that in that country the poor were not regulated by • system like that which prevailed in England, but were subject to charity alone for their existence. lie should therefore vote for the Hill before their Lordships, be oats* he considered that it would ameliorate the condition of the pony& claws. - The Earl of LIMERICK—With respect to what had linen I from the Noble Earl (Darnley), he must say that the danger Would I not occur again in Ireland, foe now the circulation of paper was in the hands of • body of persons of great wealth, and the whole of their property was liable. He (Lord Limerick) did say, that in propottion as the population was poor, the amount of small notes I in circulation was greater. The banks to which he had referred were solvent, and had paid their notes in sovereigns when called upon so to dn. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that though he did not consi. der it necessary to detain their Lordships at soy great length, he considered it necessary to offer a few observations nn what had fallen from the Noble bold (Lord Carnervon). He should consider it necessary to say a few words with respect to the measure which he I had proposed to their Lordships for their adoption, as well as in re. I gad to that which his :Majesty's Government had abstained from I adopting, and which bad been alluded to by the Noble Lord. With respect to the latter, he (Lord Liverpool) must eay that lie felt satisfied that if he had ever rendered his country any service, be had never rendered it more essentially than when he re. trisect to listen to an advance of Exchequer bills, for if redress toe the then prevailing distress had been so afforded, the country would have looked up to his Majesty's Government on every occasion on which distress might arise. The first instance in which such assistance had been afforded was in 17113, which he must say was one of very bad policy, but which had been followed up on several other occasions. It could not be pretended that the late distress arose from any political circumstance, or by the act of God, but it was admitted on all hands that it was the effect of over. trading. If therefore Government had followed the former prece. dents of &Wading assistance, it would have eventually led to the most fatal consequences. It was only for foreign countries to do their duty, and their Lordships would hear no more of Exchequer bills. If such relief had been afforded, it wax his fine belief that it would have gone into other hands than those for whom it was in. tended. One of the principal objections to the measure was that secrecy was required by those who asked fur it; the object, there. fare, was to encourage speculation. and to prevent the world from knowing the real state of affairs. The name of every man antilylng tor a s sistance under such circumstances should be known. He (Lord Liverpool) had seen the deputation of the manufacturing cummu. oh, from Manchester; and he had put the question to them whether they stipulated for secrecy, and they said. No; they were quite ready to receive relief in the way proposed, and without any such regulation. The relief ought to be afforded by the hanks of the country : they were the proper channels through which It ought to be received. The Bank of England was empowered by its Char ter and by law to afford assistance, and the Government said, if it laboured under any difficulty from them, they would relieve them from it. Three years ago, an application of a similar nature had been made from the West Indies under strong CllCUlllatallCtS, and on another occasion by the landed interests, but which were refused. If it was done for one, it should be done for all ; but lie ( Lord Liverpool) would say, do it for none; unless. indeed, under cir cumstances which had occurred without the reach of human con. trot. It had been said, that the present would have been a very easy session of Parfament if the advance of Exchequer bills had been made. Such perhaps might have been the case. In pursuing a contrary line of conduct, therefore, his Majesty's Government had involved themselves in some parliamentary difficulty anti embar rassment, by pursuing that line of conduct which they considered the best for the interests of the country. In reference to that part of the subject mentioned by the Noble Lord (Lord Cameron) as to robberies by highwaymen and footpads, he had a perfect recol lection of the danger of the period, particularly as lie himself bad suffered from it, on an occasion when he was going to school, which was at q period of his life when he was less able to bear such an attack as since. He would not go further into the subject than to et ate that certainly for the last four or five years gold had been in general circulation in the neighbourhood of London, without a re- 1 currence of those events. It might, as had been observed by • Noble Lord (Darnley), have been considerably prevented by the departments of general police, under the Secretary of State fur the home Department, but he (Lord Liverpool) did not consider that et ensure would have proved wholly effective, but for the enclosing of the Commons in the neighbourhood of the public road, under the General inelosure Act The Noble Lord (Lord Camarvon) had asked whether the proposed measure would put a stop to over. trading, and whether such might not exist with a metallic cur rency r The object was to establish a inure substantial system of banking ; the measure then before their lordshipa, and the one in progress in the other Hume of Parliament, lie was sisti,tied would have the desired effect. In respect to the system on which the banks of Scotland were formed, and the number of the batiks, their Inas:nese was carried on by agents which acted as a check upon each. other. Be would suppose t h at they had arrived at the year 1833, and he woold say, that then it would be imposalble to adopt it. When the exclusive privilege of the Bank should Le done ;way, and the chartered batiks established, they would extinguish the present system, but the Scotch system could no: be introduced. He (Lord Liverpool) did not admit that the extinguishing of one and. two pound notes would prevent overtrecling, but it would tend to check it. All the more substantial country bankers with whom he (Lord Liverpool) had communicated, had told him that small notes were not essential to their business, and they would as soon be without them. He believed that statement; but it was not the ease with the lesser banks. The doing them away would have the best possible effect. The measure of establishing a substantial system of banking would check over.trading and speculation. The Noble Lord (Carnarven) said that smell notes could not be withdrawn without considerable inconvenience. On that head he would refer the Noble Lord to Manche/off and iut neighbourhood, where there hail not been any in circulation fur the last three or four years; and that in a neighbourhood of the greatest mercantile consideration. London and Liverpool paid three-fourths of the customs and excise duties of all England, and Liverpool alone as much as ell England, London excepted, and there the withdraw. rig of small notes had had no ill edict. lie would ask if the court. try bad not • metallic currency prior to 1797 in all parts? And lately the manufacturing districts had not suffered so much as the agricultural. It was not trying a new experiment, but going back ni what was the 'Went' the currency prior to the year IPA, and lie (Lord Liverpool) was perfectly persuaded that if small times were not the cause of the late distrait', they had considerably tended to loco/sae It. The Earl if LAUDERDALE defended the Scotch banking system, tail said, that whatever opinion he had of the measure he lore their Lordships, he could not agree that the present was the proper period for bringing is forward. The amendment was then negatived without a division, and the Bill wee reed a second titoe. The Bills trom the Commons (see above) were +hen toed a I tit time, sod their Loitiships adjourned at half-past e ght. HOUSE OF COMMONS, TUESDAY, MARCH 11. RA3IB9ATE THEATRE. Sir E. KNATCHBULL moved the third reading of the Run gala Theatre Bill. Mr. Aldan:oast WOOL) said that ha had received a letter from his Colleague relative to the Bill before the House. Ile felt great reluctance to offer any opposition to the Bill in its present mar. He understood that the erection or the theatre in question was in opposition to the wishes of a large proportiottof the inhabitants of R a msgate. If the Bill passed, it would place the theatre without the control of the local Magistrates, who could not in their official duty retrain any irregularity which might occur in the manage ment of the theatre. Mr. BERNA I. said that the proprietor of the theatre in question had embarked all his property in the speculation, which be had undertaken without anticipating any opposition from the inhabi tarts. A theatre had been established by the sante proprietor at 3largate. and had been conducted without incurring any censure; and he could not therefore think it fair to suppose that any injury could arise from the erection of a theatre at Ramsgate; to be con ducted by the same propriettv. After a few words from Mr. Alderman Tint Ants and Sir E. KNATCHBULL, the Bill was read a third tine. STEAM NAVIGATION. Mr. M. FITZGERALD bmught in a Bill to regulate the navi gation by meant of ships trading between the United Kingdom and the West India Islands and the C,ontinent of Aunties. DUTY ON MALT. Sir E. KNATCHBULI. presented a petition from the county of Kent praying foe a repeal of the duty on malt. ABOLITION OF SLAVERY. Sir E. KNATCHBULI. presented two petitions from Brand. brook and Leman in the county of Kent, praying for the abolition of slavery in the Colonies. He said that those petitions were signed by highly respectable persons, that no improper means were resorted to in order to get up those petitions, and that they ex pressed the opinions of those who had signed dom. Mr. F. BUXTON said that the cause would stiffer by any tree. guise means being resorted to, in order to bring forward such peti tions : the cause was in itself sufficiently strong to stand without such aid. The only petition with which he was connected hail been brought forwont on very different views. The petition from Nor folk. to which he alluded, had not been signed by any person tinder eighteen years of age, and every care had been taken to prevent any objectionable person from signing it. Similar petitions were presented by Sir E. KNATCH BULL from Mauler,. in Kent ; from Watlington ; and by 31r. P. COR BETT from Shrewsbury. SCOTCII BANKS. Mr. C. DUNDAS presented a petition from the Corporation of Leith against any alteration in the banking evatem of Scotland. LAU OF DEBTOR AND CREDITOR. Mr. J. SMITH presented a petition from the bankers of Lon don, preying the House to take notice of the law of debtor and cre ditor. The lion. Gentleman said that by the law, as it stood at present, great injury and inconvenience arose in commercial trans actions. The provisions of theism were deemed most unfavourable by the proportion of persons whose assents were requisite to an ar. rangement of a debtor's affairs. By the failures which hail taken place in the City in the space of three months, b or fl millions of property were shut up, which of course must inevitably be attended with great inconvenience and injury. If the Bill which hail been laid before the consideratipn ov the [louse had been passed, that property would be available, and many most respectable persons would have been spared the disgrace of becoming bankrupt—a dia. grace the obloquy of which could never be obliterated from their memory, and which entailed upon them most painful recollections, ands ffixed to their posterity a stigma of reproach. Mr. BRIGHT felt gratified that the Bill which he had intro duced had received attention in the House. He was glad it was approved of. Ile was anxious to forward the Bill, because he thought it advantageous to the interests of the British merchant. He thought every man should have a right, in the exercise of a sound discretion, to place his affairs in such bands as he thought most expedient and advantageous for his interest; he thought that every means should be devised, without violating any principle of law, to prevent the disgrace of bankruptcy. This Bill would have the effect to prevent its frequency, and to preserve the honour of the British merchant. Mr. Alderman BRIDGES approved the principle of the Bill. Mr. ELLICE thought that an arrangement by composition was a remedy worse than the disease, anti always ended by being at las: thrown into Chancery. He was, however, glad the Bill was in such hands, and hoped its operation would be extended to Ireland. Mr. J. S.ll ITII said that in his opinion the Bill would at all events diminish the number of small bankrupts. Ile could not think that the provisions of the Bill would render recourse to the Geurt of Chancery more frequent than at present. Mr. Milli lIT said that he had received various suggestions, to all of which he had paid every attention, and he would continue to receive them with equal pleasure, and would avail himself of them to give the Bill every improvement in his power. Be did not think that the Bill could be extended to Ireland with any advantage, but when the Bill came fairly before the llouse, then they could dis cuss that and any other suggestion which might be made. AD. LOCKHART supported the Bill, which was ordered to be printed. SLAVE TRADE. Mr. F. BUXTON moved that an humble address be presented to his Majesty, praying that there be laid before the House a re turn of the number of slaves exported from the Mauritius and other East India Islands, and the names of their owners, and also the names of the places to which they were sent, since the capture of those Islands. Also a return of the quantity of cotton exported from the same places during the same period. BENEFIT SOCIETIEs. Mr. FLEMING presented a petition from the General BeniAt Society of Portsmouth, praying that no alteration might take place in the law relative to those Societies. ABOLITION OF SLAVERY. Petitions praying for the abolition of slavery in our West India Colonies were presented from Newport by AD. Corbett; from Ton. bridge Wells and Gondhurat, in Kent, by Mr. Bonet/wood ; from Cambridgeshire by Lord Francis Osborne; front llotidnitlon by Mr. Calvert; from Southwold by Colonel Wodelioupe; and from the Moderator and Presbytery of Dundee by Mr. Lindsay. SCOTCH CURRENCY. Petitions were presented, praying that no alteration might be made in the present currency of Scotland, from Cawdon by Mr. Archibald Campbell; from Cupar Angus by Mr. Stuart Wortley; from the Provost anti Magistracy of Dundee. from the calico printers anti manufacturers of Perth, from the Provost and Magis tracy of St. Andrew's, and from Cupar in File, by Mr. Lindsay. CORONER'S ALLOWANCES. Mr. MACQUEEN prevented a petition from the Coroners of the County of Kent, - -- log for an increase of their allowances. prayb.„ CARRIAGE LAMPS. Me. ESTCOURT presented a petition fruit certain individuals, preying that all carriages might be compelled to carry lamps lighted upon dark nights. (Great laughter). SCOTCH BANKING SYSTEM. Lord A. HAMILTON presented a petition from the Noble men, Freeholders, and Justices of the Peace, of the county of Lanark, praying that no alteration might take place in the present banking system of Scotland. Mr. IJRUMMOND said a few words with respect to the gene ral feeling lo s Scotlsod as to any alteration of the present banking system, but was wholly inaudible in the gallery. Mr. DUNDAS said that the opiniun was general throughout Scotland, fronn.Cumberland to Caithness, that their present paper system nith! rot to be interkred with. Mr. ABERCRO3IBY said that the great majority of the pe titions which had been presented to the House had been sent by freeholders only, and these formed but a small portion, and could not therefore be supposed to express the sentiments of the great bode of the Sandi people. Mr. ELLICI contended that the present system of banking in Scotland was founded upon a solid basis, and, as we understood him, deprecated the idea of extending the provisions of the Small Note Bill to that part of the kirigoolii. • Mr. J. SMITH, made some observations, which were inaudible in the gallery. Mr. Al A HERIX declared his belief that the people of Scotland were so attached to a paper circulation that they bad not the timeliest wish for any change. For his own part he thought a paper circu lation preferable to one of gold, and he should therefore support its continuance as far as regarded Scotland, particularly as no reason had been advanced to prove the expediency of an alteration. Mr. 11. DRUMMOND. said, that if the Hon. Member for Co• rentry (Mr. Ellice) could convince him that the banks in Scot land, as well as the system, were solid, still would he contend that a committee was the more necessary, that these :acts might be in quired into. 3lr. H. (11,.TRNEY was inaudible. Colonel J(111 &.4)N said that the people of Scotland never had any opti)n as to whether they should have paper or gold. He he never! If the sentiments of the people in that portion of the empire were generally known, they would be found to be congenial to those of the people of England, and no: quite accordant with the opinions of those gentlemen who had presented their petitions, and who per haps had an interest in encouraging a paper circulation. dlr. BARING belie►ed that the appointment of a Committee at the present time would be an injudicious measure, breanse he be lieved that the opposition on the part of Scotland was unanimous against any alteration of their currency. Ile believed the Right lion. Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) would find it more difficult to get rid of the small notes in England than was generally Bopp tacit in that Muse; and in extending it to Scotland lie believed the difficulty would be magnified in a most amazing degree. Still he was satisfied that the measure was good for no thing unless it was to be extended to Scotland ; but, to insure sue. teas the utmost caution was to be observed in every advance to• wards the consummation of the wishes of the Right Ilon. Gentle. man. ' The OM NCELIAM of the EXCHEQUER wished to be understood that he never entertained the slightest intention of sub. mining any proposition to the Committee which might hereafter be formed, as to whether Scotch Banks were solid or otherwise. There war no parliamentary ground for establishing a commission to make such fan inquiry. Ilia object was, that inquiry should be made to ascertain how far it was desirable to continue a small note circulation in Scotland after it had been abolished in England. The result of the labours of such a Committee ;night perhaps satisfy hint (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) that it was not desireale ro extend the provisions of the mall note Bill to Scotland, or other wise it might have the effect of convincing the itthabimnis of that kingdom that the measure was eminently calculates to render them an essential service. dlr. HUJI C said that lie had presented petitions from a variety of places in Scotland, all praying that nu vlteration might be mete in the banking system of that country. These petitions were, for the most part, agreed to at public meetings, sometimes numerously attended and without a single dissentient voile. He protested against its being received as an opinion that Scotland was not uni. ted in opposition to the measure. Mr. ARERUIOMBT and dlr. DttXDAS mutually explained, after which the petition was ordered to lie on the table. THE BRITISH PRESS. Lord ARCHIBALD HAMILTON then presented similar petitions from the Prevost and Magistracy of Elgin; from the s Provost and Magistracy of !fleeting ; from the manufacturers of Elvin ; and from the inhabitants of Banff. Mr. BANE ES presented a petition from the Trusters of the British llitiseum, praying that the annual grant might be cond. nued.—Ordered to he printed. :Sir F. 03131 A NEY Presenter)a petisinn from some part of the county of Leitrim, praying the House to take into its consideration the expediency of devising some means to promote emigration from Ireland. The Honourable Baronet also read a letter, we believe from some person in Upper Canada, expressive of the good effects which had resulted from the measurer already adopted in former instances. The petition was read, and ordered to be printed. Sir ROBERT WILSON said that he should move fora return of tavern expenses charged by the Commissioners of Bankruptcy fur the last three years, and also for a return of the number of war rants issued into the county of Surrey from the Courts at West minster Hall. Mr. E gave notice that he !tumid move for a return of the number of Crown debtors—and an account of the clothing that had been furnished to the army since the termination of the war. EqUITABIJE AnJUSTM ENT. Mr. HUM E said that he held in his hand a petition which pointed nut the great evils which resulted from the continual varia tions which occurred in the currency of the country. It came from Charlet Andrew Thornton, of Chiswick, in the county of 31fletlle sex. The petitioner, who is now a bankrupt, under a commission of the Chancery Court, stated that he and his father, in the year 1702 were posiessed of 300.11001. Console. Soon after the com mencement of luktilities with France, they were. in conjunction with thousands of others, euffering from the freest rise in the prices ,of property and labour. The petitioner was obliged to sell out at a loss of 85,0110 L, occasioned by the depreciation of Consols, which were reduced from 92 to 63. Fin ling that the remaining 265,0001. of money which their consols w ruld produce watt getting deterior nted in quality, anti not. in fa:t, worth more than 90,00111.. Mee determined to invest it In laid. In 1810 they did devote 72,0001. in the purchase by ready money and incidental expenses of stn emit:, under the Court of Chancery, its the county of Hertford. They also min-based different farms in other counties at an ex pense of 33.166!. in ready money. In 11;11. after the suspension of cash payments, the petitioners bargained with Dr. Trenchant for an estate, for which 110,0001. was to be given. Of this, 5.5551. was de posited. hut, from defects of title, the expenses in 1018. including purchase money and interest. amounted to 65,1181. which the path. timer was obliged to pay to Dr. Trenchard. In the year 1811, re ! thinner and his father, in addition to the investment of the money in land, embarked extensively in the business of wine.mer ! chants. here they sustained a loss of 60.0001. on their money paid dow n,antl ,his loss was caused by a sudden reduction in the price of wine. In 1621, another change was brought about in the currency by the return to cash payments. by which the petitioner was again ruinously affected on the principle of reaction. The result of the entire proceeding, with respect to Dr. Trenchard, was, that by the various changes which occurred, that gentleman received a balance tat 32.332/., without any equivalent whatever to petitioner, who was obliged to pay that sum. The Doctor's estate was in his pm session uninjuted, and yet he meant to apply to die Court of Chan cery for permission to take possession of petitioner's other estates, In which, Wile should succeed, he will have obtained 104,a2i. of the petitioner's property without any equivalent. He (Mr. Hume) did not are how that House could interfere to give relief as prayed for by the petitioner, who recommended the principle of an equitable adjustment, whereby contracts should 'oe completed throughout, in all their details, according to the value of the coin at the time of their commencement. The petitioner alleged that it was a maxim in law that there was nn wrong without a remedy. As the Courts of Law would not act in his favour, he had, therefore, petitioned that House. An Honourable Member, whose name we could not learn, made some observation, which was inaudible in the gallery. Mr. lIIONCK did not think that Dr. Frencbard could be blamed for Raining by the loos of the petitioner. It was a matter independent of either, to detefmine originally what would be the result of the transactions in which they engaged. However he saw no remedy for the mischief. The Courts of Equity could not step forward to correct the Acta of Parliament in favour of an indivi dual, nor could the Equitable Adjustment be adopted. The time had gone by. It should have been Rend on after twenty-five years of depreciated currency. The difference between England and France in this case was aot in the degree of the disease, but in the time to be taken for the operation of such a regi men. The case detailed in the petition should be a warning to Government not to tamper with the currency, the fluctuations of which were found to produce such disastrous consequences to inno cent individuals. Mr. HU3IE explained, and the petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. SYKES presented a petition from the candle-makers of some place of which we did not hear the name, praying for a re duction of the duty on tallow.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. MA BE RIX said that he should :stove fur the gross and net amount of the receipts at the Post-office and Custom-house during the titst nine weeks of the years 1825 anti 1826; and also an ac count of all money received into the Exchequer and paid thereout, and of the balance for die time between the sth of January, 1825, and sth January, 1826. Mr. S. RICE presented a petition from some part of the county of Limerick, praying for means of emigration.—Ordered to lie on the table. Lord NUGENT moved that an humble address be presented to his Majesty by such Members of the House as were of the Privy Council. for a return of the salaries of the Governor and Lieu tenant-Governor of Jamaica and the Leeward Islands, and of the Chief Justices of the Courts and of the Clerks of Arraigns in the same places, distinguishing between the salaries paid from this country and those voted by the Colonial Legislative Assemblies. EMIGRATION. Mr. W. HORTON rose. according to notice, to move for a Select Committee on the subject of emigration. The subject was not novel, for it had been already in the course of trials. In 1823, 326 persona had been sent out to Lipper Canada as emigrants, at an expense of 22/. each. There was not a shadow of doubt that the expense thus incurred had been productive of great benefit. as the Indi/ideal* who were the ohjeets in that instance were very cont• fertahly settled at present in Upper Canada. The number of mi. grants sent out in 1825. in furtherance of the principle cf 1823, was on a more extensive scale. They amounted to 3,024, and the expense dig not exceed the former estimate 221. each per. eon. For that aunt those individuals had been sent out from Ire land—from a state of wretchedness to a situation of comfort. The emigrant,' were paupers, and insapable of providing for themselves in their own country. The change was therefore from misery to competency. For the details he would refer to the Appendixes of the Reports of the years 11123 and 1824 on the subject. It would be sufficient for him to mention, that the first emigration had sue. seeded, and that the second was in such a state of progress as indi cated a similar result. Various accounts had been received of the condition of the emigrants settled in Upper Canada, and these con. coned in representing them as being in great prosperity, and con. ducting themselves with the highest propriety, and giving the most meritorious examples of decorum. They were fully identified with the other inhabitants. The Hun. Member read a letter tram 3lr. Fitzgibbon, a respectable resident in the place, which testified to the facts concerning the emigrants comforts and prosperity. The Hon. 3lember also read a letter from one of the emigrants, dated September, 1823, to the sante cfftct. lie then called on the House to institute a comparieon between the different modes in which the emigrants lived in Canada and in Ireland. The accounts received from Canada were of a moat cheering character, and formed a strik ing contrast to the Report of the evidence given by Doctor Doyle, General Bourke, and those other gentlemen who had been examin. ed on the state of Ireland. That was the effect of merely trans porting them from one country to the other. At the time when he had made tke motion far emigration, in 1825, the lion. Men•ber for Aberdeen (Mr. Hume) and an lion. Baronet not now in his place, objected strongly to the proposed expetidnure, under sn im pression that the measure was to be permanent. It was then ex. planted, and, be trusted, to the satisfaction of his economical op. l ponenta, that the intention of Government was to prove the practi ' eability of the plan, and by their success induce public-spi. rited individuals to embark in similar enterprises. Now, it ap peared to him that this matter could be best determi ned In a Select Committee, which would be enabled to examine all the bearings of the subject, and to apply the results of the expe rience which had been derived from Upper Canada. lie had little doubt but the Hon: Member for Aberdeen would recollect that when the Committee was appointed to inquire into the state of Ireland, Mr. s.l•Culloelt, who was examined, was asked whether, in his opinion• it would be advantageous to encourage I the emigration of a helpless anti dependent family, consisting of four, at an expense of Pit!., which would be allowing 201. for each individual ; when, if they remained in Ireland, they would con tinue burthensome to the amount of 201. a year. And here he would observe that it was not an emigration of property or capital that was contemplated, but a relief of Ireland ftom its burdens, sod by making their exertions available, a a profitable employment of these distressed individuals in the colo nies. The reply of Mr. M'Culloch was, "If you can save a yearly expense of 201., at the tate of four years' purchase, and can lay the landlords under an obligation not to allow the vacancy occasioned by the emigrants to be filled up by 0111CTNOlear, front Mr. Iltintej it will imqueationahly be advisable to do so." Now lie did not say this opinion was right or wrong; but when he recollected that the Honourable Gentleman (31r. Hume) a few evenings ago observed " there was nothing so absurd, so farcical as this emigration •" and even quoted the name of 3lr. Itl•Culloeft, he (Mr. Ili:orlon) thought he might be excused quoting the opinion of this gentle man. The principle and essence of well-directed emigration was, that individuals should be localised—that they sho u ld be assisted in the erection cf their houses, and be afforded . . the means necessary for the V early cultivation of their pos. sessions. The question, of course, mixed up with thla wan, whether it was better, under all eircumatances, to trade with your own colonies or not. He thought this inquiry ought to be insti toted by Parliament. It cught to be ascertained whether the pre sent sy►tem was not ausceptible of such improvement as would ren der the colonies valuable appendage* of the empire. !le was not desirous of trespassing any further on the time of the House, not appreliertling any opposition to what he had to move. Ile would make ore oilier observation. While such attention was being paid to the criminal law of the country, -should they not ask what would diminish crime in Ireland ? if emigration was calculated to retie the tlistre, , :s of that country, and restore it to tranquillity, he thought it would be conceded to him that it was worthy or sup. port The Honourable Gentleman concluded with moving that a Set 'et Committee he appointed to inquire into the expediency of en.- cou aging emigration. Mr. 1iC311.; would not oppose the measure of the Honourable Manlier; for he was satisfied it' this question was inquired into as proposed, the report of the Committee would be against the country expending its money to forward emigration. He would now repeat, what he had said before, that it would never answer to incur the ex- pence necessary for sending the poor out of Ireland. The opinion of 111 r. M`Cullocle which had been quoted, did not refer to the ex tension of this einq,eratinn. in reference to this he had said, "it might be advisable if they had money enough. On being asked whether he thotigla the emigration of 100,000 would relieve Ire- land, he said No; that, in his opinion. the emigration of this num ber would be a mere nothing. He said also, that sending away 600,000 might make some difference, if you could prevent a repro. duction, without which you would have in two years the same amount of population, it being admitted that population always in creased in proportion to the means of subsistence. Supposing. then, a necessity tOr sending away :010,000, would the House con sent to expend 10,000.001. that it might procure for Ireland relief that would only extend to one or two years ? In his opinion it was absurd to think of it; the country, lie was sure, could not sup port such sort of expense. Though he rested on the opinion of Mr. 'Culloch on this question, he was not prepared to agree in all the principles or opinintoi of that Gentlemsn. It was unnecessary for the Grovernmeut to incur such an expense for another mason. Every body knew that if he could find a passage to America with a few pounds in his pocket, he could establish himself in business for life. Another fact lie would state was, that by confining the trade to our own colonies, we got bad goods at a high price, while, if it were not an confined. we might get better articles at a cheaper rate. Mr. SPRING RICE made a few observations, we believe in 'option of emigration. Mr. BERNAL observed, that the emigrant, on his arrival at the seat of Government, had to encounter ninny ditliculties. Ile wished to ask the Honourable Gentleman if they had still to pay the fees ? Mr. W. 1 1 ( OR TON said they had been withdrawn. There had been an entire change in this respect. Mr. Alderman WOOD htul passed emigrants from day to day ; and he had no doubt, it' tine Honourable Gentleman wished to ex tend the operation of his system, many of his constituents would have no objection to receive 20/. 'or a mallet or larger suet, as an inducement to emigrate. lie had not any doubt about being able to furnish the Honourable Member ten a day for the next twelve months. The motion was then agreed to. FRIENDLY SOCIETIES. Mr. COURTENAY moved for leave to bring in a bill to eonso. !Mate and amend the laws relating to Friendly Societies. lie thought the members of these societies ought to be plac:d in a situa tion of greater security. Mr. CB F:TW YNDE knew of instances in which magistrates had refused altogether to recognise the rules of these societies. Ile thought the Savings Banks now e►tabli.hed were caclulated to sup. plant them. These banks were. in his opinion, superior to the societies, as they afforded a greater security. Leave given. POOR'S RATE. Mr. E. WODEIIOCSE " ;;;Od7o;; return of the total amount of poor's rate and county rate (similar to that of 11123); diAtin etushing therein the various bonds of property liable to as , e , antent. He wsa induced to move for this return, because the subject, he considered, commenced with the corn laws. Several committees had sat on the noon rate. In one of these, in 1813, the Honourable Member for Wootton Bassett obtained an account of the sum levied, and it was for a similar return he now moved. Mr. PHILIPS said a few words, after which Mr. 310NCK observed, that the small farmer was taped by the present system, and the large farmer got his labour cheap at the farmer's expense. Mr. J. SMITH knew an instancenf every man in the parish having received parochial relief. Ile thought an appeal might be made in such cases. ....... Lord JOHN RUSSELL maid individuals were deterred making appeals by the expense. He knew an instance of 101 appeal costing _ . . Mr. Pal 1.1. IPS and Mr. Alderman Woof) made a few observa. thin% which we could not hear. . . . s. Mr. WODLHOUSE admitted the evil of connecting labour wit b the poor's rate, and showed that the burden bore on land, as would be evident by referring tw the coninierciallcounties in contra distinction to the agricultural. The Honourable Gentleman then proceeded to read the following POPULATION ABSTRACT, 1321. COUNTIES WHERE THE LARGER PART OF VIE POPULA TION IS EMPLOYED IX HANDICRAFTS. LANCASHIRE.-112,271 feintilies employed in trade-22.723 fa milies employed in agriculture—total amount:Or charge 326,4771. ; of which 137,7901. charged on land-49,3731. trade. WEST it I nix& of VoaKstaittE.-103,841 families employed io trsde-31,613 in avriculture—total amount of charge, 281,963/.- 1115.6511/. charged on land-21,8251. on trade. STAFFORnsIintE.-42 423 families employed in trade-18.283 in agriculture—total charge 140,2571.-99,7151. charged on land -6,0211, on trade. Wan w rt:KS ine.-39.1133 families employed in trade-16,779 in agriculture—total charge 139,6661.-139,7251. charged on land -9,6181. on trade. DER lITSIII ItE.-20.505 families employed in trade-14,532 in agriculture—total charge 90,3361.-73,04;8/. charged on laud -1,7271. on trade. NOTTINGHAMSHIRE.-21,832 families employed in trade -13.664 in agriculture—total charge 81,3211.-57,13131. charged on land-2.8631. on trade. CH 9lf I R E.-27,105 farniliea--Trade, 111.120, agricahure— Total charge, 117,2121.-89,79 rd. lard-5,2191. trade. COUNTIES WHERE THE GREATER PART OP THE. POPULA TION IS EMPLOYED IN AGItICULTURE.-POPELATION ABSTACT. 1821. . . .„... ESSEX.--33,21.6 families employed in agriculture; fa milies in trade. Total charge, 277,013/.-215.4931. in agriculture —8.2041. in trade. KENT.--30,8t9 families employed in smietilture-30.1/10 fa. milieu in trade. 'rota charge, 373,786/..-257,917t. in agriculture —11.258/. in trade. . . .... LINCOLNsIintE,—.2O,BBI families employed in sericulture; 13,184 families in trade. Total charge, 193,1171.-16576111. in sgriculture-4,0.171. in trade. Surrnt.►.-91i,4116 tantilies employed in agriculture; 15,180 families in trade. Total charge, 239,7471.-214,4 M. in agriculture —5,2881. in trade. \onr•ot.x.-51,451 families employed in agriculture; 23 082 families in trade. Total charge, 2'82,15111.-224 9771. in agrieul ture-4,2851. in trade. . . . . SOME RSETBIIIRE.—M472 families employed in agriculture; 23.732 families in trade. Total charge, 174,58.1 L-1341,8411. in agriculture, 10.13/. 14a. in trade. NORT II AM PT ONBIIIR E.-15,235 families employed in agricul ture; 12,100 families in trade. Total charge, 143,3161.-132,002/. in agriculture—W4 /. in trade. Con NWAL L.-19,3412 families employed in agriculture; 15,553 families in trade. Total charge, 112,5371.--U7,233/. in agricul ture-2.191i/. in trade. I)evosr.-37,037 families employed in agriculture; 33.9135 fa milies in trade. Total charge, 21:7,424/.-175,412/. in agriculture, 2,1;23/. in trade. N.B. Amount of Property—Lancashire, 3,000.060/.; Esssex, 1,010.00/. ; West Riding of Yorkshire the same as compared with Kent or any other. Mr. Alderman WOOD did not know what the lion. Gentleman meant to show by all those figures which he had been reading ; did not trade pay the rates after all ? He should be very glad to know how the Hon. Member. if he did not enjoy a very high price for his corn, would be able to pay the charge. It was mule alone that paid that high price, and it was trade, in fact, which paid the taxes of all kinds. (laughter.) The motion was then agreed to. TURNPIKE TRUSTS-51 IDDI.F.SEX. Lord LI/W.IIIER, attet a few observations, obtained leave to bring in a Bill in consolidate certain turnpike trusts in the coanty of Middlesex. TIRIBERr AT ELECTIONS BILL. On the order of the day being read fur the second reading of this Bill. WYNN rose, not for the purposc of offering any cp position m the second reading of the Bill, but to state to ths Noble Lord (J. Russell) who had introduced the Bill to the House, that there appeared to him (Mr. I('. Wynn) so many objections to the details of the Bill as at present prepared, That however he might agree with the Noble Lord in principle, he should still think it incumbent on him to oppose it, unless those objections were re moved, Ile had no wish to impede the progress of the Bill by de. daring those objections nowt but would, if it should be conve nient to the Noble Lord, consent to the Bill going into a Commit tee, in order that its provisions might be considered, and to tee how far his objections might be removed. Lord JOH N RUSSELL said it was not his wish to press the Right Hon. Gentleman to enter prematurely upon a statement of his objections to the Bill, but it certainly would he more convenient to himself (Lord J. Itus,sell) if those objections were stated at, pre. sent, that he might take them into. consideration, and endeavour,. either to answer them. or adopt the suggestions which might result from them. (Cries of " Go on.") Mr. W. W YNN then stated shortly his objections to the Bill as at present framed. He thought there was one object which it was intended by this Bill to effect, but which could now he efficiently done without any further legislative act of that House. The House at present loot the power, in the appointment of a Com mittee, to inquire into the matter of airy petition alleging corrup tion at elections, to determine whether the decisions of that Com mittee should be compulsory or not. The House reserved to itself also the power of deciding whether such a Committee should be appointed or not. If the Committee were appointed, and should make a Report (as it would necessarily do) to the House, there still remained a power with the House to determine whether any steps should be taken on that Report, or whether the whole matter should terminate. All the objects Inc which this Bill went to provide could be equally answered by the exercise of the power of the House itself. Then this Bill did not propose any penalty on the person who should prefer a frivolous and'vexatious petition to the House. The Noble Lord had also by this Bill directed that the inquiry on petitions sliculd in all instances be entered into at the public ex pense. This war in his opinion holding out such a temptation to those who might be induced to intimidate by threats persons to whose interests they were hostile, that he thought it most objec tionable, and would lead to innumerable proceedings of a most vex. atious description. Upon the whole lie was quite convinced that the evils which would reaul' front the Bill, if passed as it at pre sent stood, would be an great, that he was sure, after a short trial, the House would deem it necessary to have it scowled. Mr. WA RR E could not agree with the Right lion. Gentleman that the present state of the law war sufficient to correct those errors which his Noble Friend (Lord J. Russell) proposed toil° by this Bill. It was notoriously the case tint in a great many bo roughs many scandalous practices prevailed. Corruption was not confined within the walla of' Parliament, but existed without it to a large extent ; because however Gentlemen might 64y that the House required reformation, it was mere affectation to deny th at those who sent them to t h at House wanted reform also, (if e „ , hear.) It was required among the electors as well as the chatted ; and it his Noble Friend co u ld but i n d uce th e 'l ouse to make at example of one or two of those boroughs where those notorious acg scandalous practices pr e v a il e d, h e b e li eve d suc h a proceed i ng held ig frrrorcnt over others would do great good. It was with this view that he was anxious to see such a Bill as this p asse d ; and he thought that whatever might be the opinions of G en tl emen en the gime:inn of reform, the House, and Ministers in particular, oug h t to make the best and most effectual efforts to provide a measure that should he efficient in correcting the shameful practices that w ere curi. , l on at elections ; but he agreed with the Rignt lion. Gentl e . Man that some penalty shook' be imposed nn those persons Om should be guilty of preferring petitions which should appear to b e frivolous and vexatious. Mr. LOCKHART said there was nothing in the Bill befor e , he House to compel the public to pay the costa: that matter mai felt to the option of the Committee. Mr. 11. GURNEY thought there could be nothing mo re i ne ,. petlient than advertising for petitions against every corrupt act which had taken place during the last six years. lie objected to ;: ie ietrospective effect of the Bill. Mr. N. CALVERT contended that the election of 3 1embera ass • public duty, and that those who abused that duty ought to beau. mediately dispossessed. Mr. W. WYNN explained.. Colonel DAVIES supported the it praposed measure. G enerd corruption could rarely be proved ;wu therefore nothing to say that the House had acted upon every occasion when general 0 3t „ ruptinn wu proved. Mr. W. SMITH said he knew an Matinee of a borough where the last Mosnbee had left lOW. unpaid to each elector, and it was In. derstnod that the nest Member was to put a number of notes for IR. into the post.office, directed to certain individuals. It could not be proved that those notes were received, but little doubt remainedu to the purpose for which they were demanded. Mr. PEA IlSk; made a few observstions, which were Inaudible. Mr. HODHOUSE supported the motion. He was willing to accept the smallest reform, and would not refuse the greatest which the House could be induc:al to grant. He was confident the country would not bear the present system much longer. A s pi r i t was now abroad on those subjects which it was impossible to subdue. They should begin with themselves. The electors could not be bribed if there was no one to bribe them, and the reform should begin with those who applied for seats in that Horse. It would be invidious to refer to partizular cases; but it was in the recollection of every person, that on a recent occasion. in which an Oftener' pe. tition was hrought before Parliament, one of the parties was sent to gaol and the other to a gratin that House, where he was actually sitting at the present moment. He was extremely glad that the House by any decision recognised the necessity of doing something on a subject which was the root of every evil. After the edniisonns of the Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Wynn), he thought ' there could be no objection to go into a Committee. !Ilan, of the regulationiconnected with elections were absurd. Amongst others, that by which it was ordered that no Peer should hare any influence at elevions, though it was well known that Peers influenced the return of a majority of that House. This absent regulation should be done away with. It was a mere mockery. He need nut go to isolated cases. Many Members in that 'louse represented their own money. An illustrious individual, Whale lots the country had lately to lament, sat in that House by paying 1.0(101. a-year out of his pocket. 'Phis was well known, and yet Gentlemen talked of the inexpediency of a sweeping reform. In his ( Mr. Hobhouse's) opinion, a sweeping reform would be blur than now allowing the necessity, now denying it,' and then coma. promising it. We should go on in this course until dooin's-day if there was not a sweeping reform. Cicero said be could not coneeire how one augur could meet another without laughing. He could not conceive how one Member of Parliament could meet another, and talk of the purity of election, without laughing. Mr. FYSCH PALMER said that the mmple of England ex pected some kind of teforin, and if the reform did not come frurn within, it would come at length from without. Lord J. RUSSELL replied. It was impossible, he said, not to know that bribery was now going on in several of the boroughs. They expected a golden harwast in July, and the returns from many boroughs would then be in virtue of money and nothing else. lie had observed in the newspapers that when it was an. nounced that his lion. Friend the membe r for Penryn (Mr. P. Grenfell) had determined to resign the representation of that borough, because something was expected which he thought it dig. graceful to give, the solicitor for the Bank welit down to Penryn to form a connection with the eleetco,, and he had Hole doubt thu some of the unsoiled notes of the Bank would find their say down. In c:nelusion, he begged for some indulgence from the House for a new Bill so lately introduced. He would be satisfia if the Bill after many alterations swished the House. The Bill was then read a second ame, aol ordered to be eom. mined on Monday next in a committee of the whole House. . MUTINY BILL. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the third reading of the Mutiny Bill. Af:er a few observations from Mr. 1.17112, and Mr. H OIMOUSE, some verbal alterations were made it, the Bill, which vas then passed. The Debtor and Creditor Arrangement Bill was read a thud time. The commitment of the Bank Charter Amendment Bill •u postponed to Thursday. The other orders of the day were then disposed of, and the Home adjourned till to -morrow (this day) at a quarter putt eleven. MINORITY Of 47, who on Friday Even inn voted for Mr. Humes Claim* In the Mutiny Act Allan, J. A. Gord,n, Robt. Leiceiter, R. Rumboldt, C. E. Brytres, Sir G. Gunny, Bullion Martin, John Stuart, William Blaine, Sir F. Guise, Sir Wm. Macdonald, Jai. Smith, John Ilernali, Ralph Graham, Sir S. Alaberly, John Smith William Benet', John Heron, Sir R. Moberly, Maier Sykes, Daniel Burdett, Sir F. Hobhouse, J. C. Mona, J. R. Sefton, Lord Buxton, T. F. Huneywood, T. P. Nugent,L ord Taylor, , M. A. Broughton, Rouse Howard, Henry N.:tertian, R. W. Woo& Aid. Crompton, Sam. Hutchinson,Ho.HOrti, Witliant Wharton. Jobe Denison, Wm. Johnson, Cu!. Palmer, C. F. Wilson, Sir K. Evans, E. Knight. R. Bickford, WM. Williams, Wis. Ferguson, Sir R. Kecawitcb, W. 111146C11, Lord J T J.lissas PAIRgn Orr--Itlght Hoe. G. Tierney; Hight Hon. W. Bartle. • " That from and after the passfug of this Act it shod' not be lawful to Inflict corporal punishment, by stripes or ladles, on any soldier serrin; in time of peace In the army, regulated by this Act, in any part of Great Britain or Ireland, notwithstanding any law or usage to the c.lntrary." EXPORTS OF GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND. lir MIL. C.I:SAR SOU AU. TREUTTEL MID WURTZ, SOW- SQUAIIE. Mr. Moreau, who is well known to the public as one of the most indefatigable compilers of the present day, has published another valuable work, from the lithographic press, relating to British commerce. It is a " statement exhibiting the whole British and Irish produce and manufactures exported from Great Britain to each kingdom. state, or colony, respectively, in every part of the world, from law to 11324, diatinguiiilillg the years of war from those of peace. " To whicti is prelixed an introduction, showing from the earliest period the real causes of the progress of British commerce and manufacture.; anti front 1814 to 11124 a comparative statement of the official and declared value of the principal articles of British and Irish produce and manufactures exported from Great Britain to all parts of the world, according to the declarations of the mer chants' exporters. " The whole concluded by a summary recapitulation, sheaving, in twenty-four taLlcs, constructed on a new plan, and exhibiting, from 11114 to 1824, the true increase or dectease of the leading branches of the whole British manufactures exported. " The whole carefully compiled. digested, and arranged the ancient part from the most authentic original records, minted and manuscript ; and the modern part from the records of Parliament , the Board of Trade, the accounts of the Custom-house, and tit: ablest writers, foreign and British. " Deilicate:l to the agriculturists, manufacturers, and merchants in Great Britain and Ireland." The author, in the well-written introduction to his eI.P. rate work, assigns the following causes for the commercial supremacy : " I. Its Constitution, which for more than a century arts 1 51 i has invested all landed property and productions of industry 'rich an inviolable guarantee. under the protection of which they have beta enabled to increase and develope themselves in perfect secari:Y. From this primary benefit have arisen the following :-- "2. The chief promoter of all liberty, that of the press, whence have proceeded, with electrical rapidity, all the inventions of Cc* nius, the progressive advancement of the arts, the laws of mecha nics. and in general every liheral idea, every useful discovery. " 3. The institution or the jury system in all matters ofjuriarett tion, placing the life and property of every citizen under the isle' guard of the law, and plote:ting him from the assaults of hulas passions. From these three organical points have arisen secontlarY ig tl ` which are at once results and causes; these are the following: — ,, 7 4. The long credit, which the immensity of capital acq ul by English merchants has enabled them to give to buyers; the fait dealing, probity, and fidelity, that preside over the collet ed of die Nation. 5. The immense consumption of almost all the nations in the two Indies, which, having recovered their liberty, or being randel l subservient to the sceptre of Great Britain, are maintained , an d si still, tier a lengthened period, be supported, by the productions of Ita astonishing industry. " 11. The magical nower of its credit, which, notwithstandingstandlng tits transitory reverses which it has undergone, and now undenn will always furnish it with means, we will not say to foment and maintain all wars it may deem necessary to its interest, but t o se* cure its independence and its glory againstits enemies. 7. Notes of It toil, rendered invi o l a te by th e national faith and by means of which England c auses a circulation of the riches 0 1 both hemispheres in favour of its commercial iinterests. " 8. Lastly, the extent and übi q uity o f its naval force, protect r' at all times the immensity of its political organization, both cow merciai and financial. •"l's all these causes may be added a no less important one, who se powerful agency predomi n ates over all tintes; we allude to ;:te existence of the Council of Trade and Colonies, whose active so,! , * diode has, for the last 14 yenta, embraced the past and present. In this work Mr. Moreau gives a strong proof of the in creasing prosperity of Liverpool. In 1821 the exl* ris .from that town were 14,807,983 f.; from Lontlol l , ja t same year, they were 13,30,169/. istat ate Mtn Acct per Cent per Ces per Cen ntto Acct ten 4 per :;atoothlar Ditto Pnto Aecl Dsoioh Be l'itto ACC French 8 dit. 7.zeiative French ItA ,:schunge. Am 4terdi NW, lit 11 ,nivierp I aintenrg otona . ;ae lorderus terlin . rrank for 'et ery bui Mena*. c ['Hest' . Madrid . lithos • lareelott !iiibrattar Anglo- 1[ Bell del Tin!pitxn United Ditto Ne Alliance Protect.) United t ♦uwtrslt co-mer* The p Ilmn, Pr Cubits, To- m lir. Jonel, Jan.l4, A. lone The pet ORAN] PA fbi Clrnpoo In thl• PARI nett. si _ . PA IV ?Arc 111 Price Vette* KV Mr. ThAN take p The v, F.,: •nd m. the Ce - 8E44 081 B , The , log Ni LECT regu the 1 Diet anna tract nigh movi in Si