The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1824-12-10 00:00:00

I I IM, I) LAW INTFLLIGE.VCX. W11.40X I. HAWKINS. COURT OF .CRANCERY, TIMISDAY, Die. 10. Seal of er Term. wits (anonym r. rite TANI. OT GROSYVVOIt. In the course of the last term an injunction had been obtained by the plaintiff to restrain the defendant from acting upon a war rant of attorney for the sum of 40001. The plaintiff became some year since the defendant's tenant to the Royal Hotel, at Chester, and as in-meting tenant agreed to take the furniture, &c. at a valu ation which was made at 4110e1. ; the warrant of attorney was given for this sum, and when the defendant. in cons/nuance of noit.pay. client or rent ,attempted to put the warrant into execution, he was entrained order of the Court. The plaintiff grounded his equity on the circumstance of his being deceived anti misled in the j statements wade to him of eat value of the inn. The Se 7.1 e E UAL moved for the dissolving of this in junction. lie would not waste the time of the l'cnirt. He would state the eircatoviances as briefly as possible. The pLintiff was the keeper of an hotel at llighbury-terrace, which was perhaps getter known to the eitLens than to the Gentlemen of the Ilar. The Royal Hatel at Chester, the property of the Lail of (ims, same, became Litenanted by the retiring of slra. Jackson, the wider. of die late proprietor. Air. Crowoby, Lord Grosvenor 's steward, wrote to Mr. Collins, a gentleman residing in the Strand. drsiriug upon seeing the advertisement Willoughbep went to who j inferred bun to Mr. Crossly, who desired him to go to Chester, look at the Tr.n, and consult his own judgment on the occasion. !le went there, did exercise his own judgment. oecame tenant to' len and r orodr no mention whatever of fraud. He now states his Cal that he was deceived by Mr. Crosby, who colluded with the heal ho !er. for the purpise of making enonecon statements respe% t•n • tie f °staid on the road, Ate. The plaintiff stated the Ntob,e atiii the !metier to be mixed lop in the transaction; to be jeined in th , s.:tire hareems for the purpese of deceiving him. Dlr. Crosby, and Cie partics, had, of course, denied the misrepresenta tion ar.d fi.-11. It would be. in fact, a waste of time to suppose they %Teri it.t.sed up its the transaction. They might as well be se cu of se ding false bills of lading to the Custom-house of Lristol or 't.' radon. There was a memorandum made of the sale wis the iotal. The in-coming tenant was to take the furniture, &c. lot a vatic • . o t e.... 1.000/. This valuation was not paid by the plain t.W. Them. y Tapioca' made wits ore of 2eol. and there was due, 22 it was s.roro to. to the Earl at pit sent, hr rem, valuation, &c. o.: less wiit./. Bs. ill When the valuation money was not to t ' at the appointed tune, floe plaintiff asked tOr time. He wrote 11-:ters en tlo ,lobiret.„ iu which he made no complaint of fraud monis elite:. taitai ma. tt content th his Situation, and proposed to N it., Ile admits eirre ass a warrant of .Ittorney, but North ram an agreement that it should rot be executed. It rats nevi t c on iotpta,ihilify that there should be such a bargain. ":..- 11:mts klieg they were dcating with a shatiling man, and they ri•al.l ni.t tatter into such an arrangement with him. Nchen the ploointiff did ply leis instahounts, he said he was misled at the p.a.,: lon tv , til , l not pay, and he mull pet rid of it altogether. In (!re o.t' the tta.isaction, the plaintiff applied tar a reduction rent it WWI granted, and the rent was reduced 2001. a year. lle had. written I. 'tees on this sebject, expressing gratitude and sails facttui• bor this conduct, and promised to perform the conditions at en to liieh the ret'uctian was made. For years he snakes no a. , nopia l iit. and he now says tae transaction is fraudulent (15 101 l :0, ate! he will get rid of it altogether. The Learned gentleman rea d tl.e plaintiff's letters, containing a recognition of the handsome martorr in which he was dealt with. The 1..• u t•oi ANC LI. no n—lliot idea was, that the money due vo Lord Grosvenor should be paid into Court ; and the simple was, it any use had been made of the warrant of attorney .”1% rot proper ? 'l' iv. ; 4 w:re t Ton-Cs:giro st. wished to remove. all idea of se. eier,:•p front If ighbury-terrace; where he was making li• ta-ta ,e amongst floe citizens. lie could produce the affidavits i: i,o' r it . pectable inhabitants of Chester, stating the converts t •::,, t tie plaintiff, in which he uevm complained of troud or un *"7 tie•iiia upon the part of Lord tirosrenor. 1, •, oi 'HAW': X r.‘ on—There was not time slightest impu t out upon the luct of his lordship. It was not ...t "c to deny that there were on the other parties to the The ..,.t.rrirnw.l3r Last. had often refused to file bills in thr• • ',andel and abuse were the ch2ects of thc corn srty. 'flier.: were eases in which lie knew the party ro• r pay a IMO of money than have a bill tiled to inquire sch.Anr lin list! behaved in a owner apposite to his fortune, and consistent with his high rai:. In this case the Noble Lord and his Stersrd done well: they avo:ded all compromise with this Iran, trio. endeavoured to get rid of his securities, to pay his land. lord, not a ith money, but with abuse, and settle his accounts with th f;:cwiir , l with scandal and reproach. Ile trusted his Lordship would parr-ire this ease was founded on the part of the plaintiff upon f i' fie:ohm and falsehood, and that he had furnished demon s:nl.ton to the mind of the Court that no further print was wanted, Itt^.t the emire war bottomed on fiction, sad the plaintiff bad no grow" for his complaint. Xi - . lion I, c followed on the same side. The ti.oiiment to be riavni,tl to-morrow. COI•ItT OF KINGS lIENCII, THURSDAY, Dv,. 9. Mr. lloyettlxsowolt opened the pleading.. This was an action breinsL: ny the pinintitr to recover compensation in damages fur the ar•- ,, vurice he received front the defendant's erecting a black smith% •, rge in a yard adjoining his house. Mr. t r tint:v stated the plaintiff's case. The plaintiff men pied N 15. I:bury-square, Pimlico; defendant came to reside in she t• ••• • . adjoining. and shortly after erected the forge. The noise er , ••- l:e Issuing from it rare rise to the present action. This ' asoally cononenred at six in the inorn:ng, and continued, vt , ; :ny intermission, til! seven in the evening. la eepitort of the Learned Gentleman's statement, several wit r.c..fca v• re produce! ; among cutlets, the plaintiff's servant, who den I, that the roise was so intense, as to shale the very earth to its fe•ridatior. In her croate.examtnation, however, she said, that 8 insufficient to shake a lodger in her master's house from his cr es en to displace the bed-elathes. The smoke was beyond Jon : p,o-ean worse than the noise ; hut that part of the nuisance was L'te", She further said, that though the noise was in. tol, e. the had no idea of giving up her place ; indeed, she sets tea 1 :.•'• a value upon a good place to glee it up for so slight a %V' She tardier said, that the noise prevented her master front writ:nu, t at it never had that effect upon her. 11/T. T. for the defendant, said, that before he touched t! r : ts of the ease, he would apply himself to the principle is st.iv.s! i- it. In order to have the noise complained of a nuisance. 1: taust ti• such as could annoy mankind, and not persons litho p:17;.• tender plants, and are nipped by the first frost ; the c0mp..7:.• !••I•St :! be fist:noted nn CIipTICIOUS.ICSS or acute sensibility, r••••• to annoy mankind in general ; it must be such as v petsons of ordinary nerve, not such as would affect a ,', ••• in. The Learned Gentleman further said, it was ridi c .ice• ••• Pave a charge of this nature bioin.:lll by an inhabitant of 1 , : -, r Lore, trout the variety of business clinical on there, a c •: • f reists etas going on every day in the year. Ile further •:r i•:. dud ie would serve to Phew the disposition of his client, u. •• er the cor.iplaint ache plaintiff's wife, as to the annoyance :••• sinnne to the in,•ebitantc of her house, the defendant e took dawn the chimney of the forge. and conveyed the •tv •• row hue to his house chimney. I! was not tnie that d • ..'•••u was constantly employed at his tinge : his trade did ne• ut;:••-•: : and thongh his Learned Friend slid his client was he 13Ir. Sateen) would shew him, that he was uo no ' ! •cd•mith, tha3 black was white. -.1 witntsses residing in the neighbourhoixl were called, to p•,.1,• • .•,•t the noise complained of was not of the serious nature • • ' ,d I.y pia,ntili - s witnesses; and sonic went so tar as to say, • ~..t i• v ro disturbance whatever to them. 51t. I .• NEY replied. far..' -,'ire L.lTTLerifest, who presided in the shaeriee of the l a rd t , let .I;! aim. addressed a few words to the Jury as to the e: •!ie cats. if a nuisance be in existence for twenty years. it co•:::•ctert for a person to complain of it, more particularly Ii tie; croon ten i iaining cone to reside in the neighbourhood of the r a'sain.3. In the present case the I,rrge was ereesed by the tle fen•'••,:; aft.v if: • plaintiff came to roside in his presert house. ';1. J airy were to consider 1r the noise was likely to annoy ordinary ,ensn, s on this head there was much conflicting evidence, and the - , lI Jury) alone were competent to decide winch side was en. Ltled n- credit. Jury, after some dedleration, rotted a verdict fur the de. i• da• • C , "• liT 0i commos PLEAS, TncasDAT, Pic. 9. •ti. •r,:l Nisi l'r:us 441 el, London, before th e c u m, JCSTIGE and a Campom ry. 11ARDATT AND ANOTIII. , t V. C01.11.1X5. 7%•i• wns an action brought by the plaintiff's, who are in business • snforil, ag tins: tie r.n attorney residing, in the • ;2:ghli,,urho.ii, for fable arrest and maliciously holdilig them t I 3!• S'rgyant Pitt. stated the ease. Ilia Learn& Friend who • the plead tip had &heathy told the Jury the nature of the . ..e , :.r.d it t ow remained fn: hint (Mr. Sergeant fell) brtetly to I.: • • :he cireatust:.ntes attending it. First, howestT, he would ..•, what might be saul by the other aide. It might perhaps • I tiult this :411,n could not be maintsined as a t riot Letion, „Asap% that tviy?:t he truly said. Hut here there acre u es of itt.cli a pee ulinr nature as wookl entitle the plaintilrs . 1:::•:,tain it. lii, ohne: in stating this so early in the cause au., attention to the evichnee which he would call before them. No: , ;.g eott:„1 he more inieriotts to a man than to lie emitted it not •c onrenienced hot it lit ortil him, and lessened hint In the • et e a:: 11.1;:hitiors, and held hint up as a man of no propertt I .. • • ..tintifi's UM:AA lc ai• 1) :rtfort!. and acre assignees to • • ot r Cowen. As such RANi:znucl they had circa. a^ error) cet,int, a pt nun of the name of Ilitgtlcti, • t op•tc. J IWO' that purpose. However, in the s ..e. the cause Inky wished to lenitive him. line en; loyett .v sl o t a as 1:•.• r: . tr agent, for the littrio , es of this sr • . • t ttl'. , es. the &fent . _ nt, ! . ..lt,tire at being thus rcinoved—tai. • a ',h.!. srAl (Went! tot wrote to the plaintitis. saying, that d,•crnored to e the papers out of his hands n^..l -1 , • rtltteall, that they cottl,l not depend 111%011 having him 11l Or That event d:d net take place, and the pia/mars ;dal in :tie achw, soon after this Collins, the defendant, ag aime t heylaintifrs for his bill of costa. which amountod to tcnee than Hash of which the master on taxation reduced 44)., gronnd !hat it api cc the phnutitli in their inkiiildual capacity. The defendant then arrested the ;dada fail& They found, on being mated, that a Mull sum of 81. 11In was doS to the plaintiK which they paid, which Collins received, and there the suit, as they thought. - ended. The plaintiffs pleaded a set-of f in two bills, one for 301. and the other for all/. The defendant must have known of this, and yet the plaintiffs were arrested. The plaintiffs applied to the Coati of Common Pleas to pay the emu of their act on, but the Court refused to grant the request. Subsequently to this, the defendant called upon several°, theplain. tifti' creditors with a view to injure their credit, but did not suc ceed, as the plaintiffs were known to be respectable and substantial persons. In tins transaction he imputed malice to the defendant, for what could be a stronger proof of it than the fact be had just related ? ll is clients, however, did not come here today for heavy darnsges—neither did they wish to take money met of the defend ma's pocket—all they sought was, to be reimbutsed the coots to which they had been put by the improper conduct of the defendant. The Learned Sergeant then called the following witnesses:— Mr. Sherbourn produced the affidavit of debt sworn to by the defendant. Robert O'Kill, the Sheriff's officer, proved that he had arrested plaintiffs at the request of Collins. Wham knew the parties, and often arrested them before. On this occasion he was desired to treat them kindly, and he did so. He took the bail of each for the other, and was paid three guineas for his trouble. They were left at large, and met him at Dartford on next market day. (;rues-examineiL—The three guineas were paid by Hodson, who was frequently arrested and hailed by Collins. Mr. Davies examined.—l was attorney to the plaintiffs 1 I paid the money on their account ; it was their private property. I paid it out of the proceeds of the action against Hug den ; a port of the costs was paid out of the joint fund. Mr. Calins had boo attor ney for the plaintiffs in an action which was brought against Mr. Ilugden. I was then appointed attorney. This bill against the plaintiffs as assignees of Cowell was tarried into the master's office tin taxation. Cross-examined.—l conducted the rause against Bugden. 31r. Collins was a very material witness, and I ultimately recovered on his testimooy. The proceedings under the bankruptcy remained in the hands of Mr. Collins. Mr. (i. Martin examined.—l am one of the Under Sheriffs. ' When Mr. Davies went out of town, I attended at the taxation of defendant's bill of costs. The bill amounted to 1011., of which 4:11. was taken of: 31r. Conine and the plaintiffs were present at the taxation, and both used such warm language that the Stow threatened to turn them both out. I don't know whether anything was then said about a wt-off. The Master. said if there were any charge, it was a charge against them not ns assignees, but in their private capacity. The Master taxes such bills, not as between the assignees and the solicitor, but as between the assignees and the estate. Bellingham examined—l am the is/milord of the Spur Inn, Borough. I know Collins, who in conversations with me told me if plaintiffs owed me any money to be sure and get it. It was proved that two bills, one of 311/. and one of SOL, were paid to the defendant on account a the plaintiff' before the arrest ; and the letter referred to in the opening of Mr. Sergeant Yell, was put in and read. This was the case for the plaintiff's. Mr. Sergeant Vat onaw, for the defendant, congratulated the Jury that they had come to the conclusion of the plaintiffs' case. The case, as to the defendant was also important, as it erected the integrity of a young man. who was starting forward in the world. The CHIEF JUSTICE—Ate there any casts you can refer Me to concerning joint actions? Sergeant PELL answered in the affirmative. Mr. Sergeant V AIM uaw.—There are many against it. However it would be the province of the Jury to assess the damages for both plaintiffs, leaving It open to my client to take such further steps as may be necessary. It is also for the Jury to say if there wits pro bable cause for this arrest • for, if there were, then the malice would be negatived The prob able cause was for the Jury to consider, and the Judge would dispose of the malice. The plaintiff were arrested for the amount of the business dove for them, and could it be construed into malice that because they could not pay, they were arrested to be made to pay ? The defendant accepted the small sum, because he had not formally sent in his bill, and that was explain ed by the evidence of the plaintiffs. It was said this bill was cut down from a lOW. to WI. but there was an admission that tiff . were due to the defendant. Collins, the defendant, knew that not hay. ing formally delivered his bill, he would have been nonsuited in the action, and for that reason it was that he consented to receive the smeller sum of five pounds. Very unfair imputations had been cast on the defendant, and the bill, in justice, was still due to him. The question here was, had the defendant a rirdit to arrest plain tiffs r It might be matter of insult, perhaps of reproach, to be ar. rested; but it the conduct of Mr. Collins was actuated by mall. clouts motives, they must have been of a very tender kind. It was said there were warm words before the Master—why to that he (Mr. Sergeant Vaughan) answered, if there were no words, there could be no business done. Malice was roundly imputed to his client, but in what did the malice consist? In delaying four months be fore he sued out his writ, in giving too much tune for payment, and requesting o*Kill, the bailiff, to be as tender, and as civil, and in convenience the plaintiffs as little as possible. This, to be sure, was all malice. O'KilL, the bailiff had a running account with the plaintiffs, they were so often arrested ; and if his employer, the defendant, chose to act maliciously, why not have arrested them publicly in the marketplace? If he were to stand on the mere form, lie would say there was noarreaL The object of an arrest was to detain the person, not to give information that the officer has a writ. There was in this ease no arrest, and he asked the Jury it' they could see either malice. grudge, or quarrel, in the conduct of Mr. Collins? The whole of the case was decisive against any such presumption. It was said that the defendant threatened to with draw himself from the witnesses box, but what followed that ? why, that a verdict was obtained tor the plaintiffs in consequence of his testimony. The arrest here was for a less sum than that allowed b the Master, and his Lordship he had no doubt would tell the Jury that the plaintiffs own witnesses had proved it. It was said that this action was nut brought to put money into the ',tickets of the plaintiffs, nor to take money out of the pocket of the defendant, and if not, it was only to waste time and du gratuitous iury. The CHIEF that his opinion was, there was no probable cause for the arrest, and if there was no probable cause, malice would be inferred. It would be for the Jury, if any, and what sum were paid on the joint account, besides the three guineas foe the bail bond, about which there could be no doubt. Taking the general circumstances of' the case, his mind was strongly impressed that there was no probable cause for the arrest, and certainly there was nothing in the attendance of the defendant in the witnesses box which nega tived malice in the least degree ; for the defendant knew, that he, like all other persons, would be bound to attend by the process of this Court. The Jury' consulted for a few minutes, and returned a verdict fur the plaintiffs.—Damages 20/. Upon the announcement of this venliet, or lather while the Jury were deliberating, Mr. :Sergeant VAl•tilime and Mn. Sergeant It'isnE observed to the Learned Judge, that they would, with leave, move for a nonsuit, in consequence of his Lordship's sum. ming up ; as they submitted that, upon the facts sworn to in the evidence, there was probab:e cause clearly shown. The C 015.,. JUsT ICI: assented to this, when Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN observed, they would prefer tendering a bill of ex ceptions. The Cit rr JUSTICE—At one time you ask on one point—then you suddenly change to another. It is tritiiiig too far. Tender your of exceptions—state them to me in writing, and I'll put my seal to them. State your facts, that there may be no difference ou dint point. Dlr. Sergeant Vstonax—l shall certainly, my Lord, reduce them to writing. but it is not convenient to The Cu kEr .1 I'sTICE-1 do not care how long I sit here ; but 1 will not proceed till they are tendered to me. I have granted in dulgence before, and 1 know the suit, not this Court may be in jured by extending such indulgence. Mr..Sergeat t VArtilIAN-1 cannot, my Lord, perform impos. sibilities. I cannot tender the bill of exceptions without having some time allowed me. It is not, 1 believe, my Lord, the practice. The Clime' JCSTIet —You must know it is the practice else. where, and it shall be so here. Business must be done as it ought to be. Dlr. Sergeant Prt.t.—May I beg. my Lord, as a personal favour that you will extepd the indulgence to my Brother Vaughan. The Cunt JUSTlCE—Throttler Pell, I really cannot. We must have rule and some order in this Court. Mr. eurrjeant VVll.llE—lf, my Lord, the verdict be considered as recorded, we are out of Court ; we are too late. The Cn r Jt.sa ice—That is not the fault cif the Court. His Lordship then left tl:e Bench, having requested Scrjeants Onsluw, Pell, and Vaughan to meet hint in his private ratalle— I;tere they remained for some minutes in consultation, but, of course, we can know nothing of what occurred. Ilia Lordship soon resumed his seat, and some uninteresting Lomition Jury causes were decided. _ . The inconvenience of the Coon is every day more sensibly felt. 11 r. ~erjunt l'ell remarked upon the loudness of the echo, and the I lief Justice upon the excessive cold ; but more especially his LonNidp, 1.,r he bas the benefit of no f u than lour doors opening uoon liun—oncat each side of the bench, uutl two at his right side. Major-General Sir J. W. Gordon, K.C.B. Quarter-Mas ter-(:corral, and Major-General Sir I 1 tiny Torrens, K.(7.11. Adjutant-General. left town yesterday morning for the Royal .'.lilitary College, at Sandhurst, preparatory to the examination of the students belonging to that establishment, which will take place this and tit: following day. By tho death of Majer-General John Rowley, a CO. iVaelry of the Royal Engineers, and the office of Deputy Inspector Ileum! of Fortifications, have b e come vacant. If ycu purchase a Ticket at Ilazattl and Co's, they will r. turn 1:•/. for it, if not tutitied to ore of the two Twenty Thousands which must he drawn (heals :a 1,090 other Prins), Next Thursday week. The return for Shares will he in proportion ; so that the Risk of a Whole Ticket is only 4'. 195., and fo , r a Sixteeeth only Nine shillings and Sixpene:.. The SAc..nie contains two of 3 0 ,000 L, two of &c., and No Blanks. Time for return till 26511 December. Ilazard and Co. have sold in the last two months prizes of ..!o,tim!!. and 30,0001., at their Offices, Royal Excham:e Gate; ; oxford-strect, cud of Re;:en t•street. THE BRITISH PRESS. WINTER HOME CIRCUIT. ESSEX ASSIZES. Cuzzarszozu, Dic. B. The Winter Assizes for this county commenced here yesterday. before the lion. Dlr. Junket Bunsouou and the Hon. 3lr. Baron GAIIIIIOIII. Edward Finn, James Bars, and Patrick Caitiffs, were Indicted for a burglary in the dwelling-house of James Crossley, Esq., at West 11am, in the night of the 20th of September last, and steal ing therein a clock, a musket, a fowling piece, seven silteespoons, and several articles of wearing appateL Mr. Crossley, the utor, who is a merchant, residing in Broad-street, city, had his country-house at West Ham broken open in the night of the 20th of September, and robbed of the articles above-mentioned. The house was then in the care of an upper servant, the family being in London. Suspicion fell upon a coatermonger, named Edward Allen, whose cart was found by a constable standing at the el oor of a public-house in Whitechapel, about five o'clock on die drilling of the fist. The constable entered the house, and found the prisoners and Allen in company drinking. The principal witness for the prosecution was Allen, the accom flice, who swore that he had been engaged by the other prisoners to sasiat them with his cart in carrying off the property stolen from the prosecutor's house. He was cortobonted in several material circumstances of his evidence. The Jury, under Mr. Justice Bwastotron's directions, found the prisoners Guilty, and judgtuent of Death was recorded pursusat to the Statute. C. Clarke was indicted for feloniously killing and slaying T. Young, at Great l'hishall, on the 10th of October last; and Jolts Burrows and Jesse Funks, were indicted as accesseries to the same felony and manslaughter. Mr. BRODItICE conducted the prosecution. It appeared in evidence that the prisoners, the deceased, and se veval other men, labourers in husbandry, had met on the night of the 10th of October, at a public-house in Great Chishall, to spend their harvest money. Itetwecn one and two in the morning they left the house in a state of intoxication, for the purpose of returning to their respective homes. In their way home some of the party began to play rough tricks upon each other, such as jostling and slapping one anther's faces. The deceased did not appear to have taken any part in this sport, but the prisoner Clarke challenged him to light, and pushed him into a ditch. Goaded by this act of ag gression, he was prevailed upon to tight. Clarke and he stripped, and the other prisoners immediately became seconds. About eight or nine rounds took place, and in the last the deceased fell insensible on the ground. lie was taken home in that state, and died next day Upon opening the head and examining the body, it appeared that a blood-vessel had been ruptured, in the former, and that in the latter one of the shoulder-bones had been broken. and on the back were marks apparently proceeding from kicks, which he was sup.. posed to have received whilst on the ground. The prisoner Ilur rows, who was the deceased's second, had endeavoured to prevail upon the latter not to light. An excellent charactet was also given to him by the parish officers, as a sober, industrious, sod well-con ducted man. hlr. Justice Br 'nor zt, in summing up the case to the Jury, paid it appeared to hint that the affray which terminated so fatally was what is called a lair light. At all events, it en.s not like any of those cases which had of late disgraced the country—he meant prize fights ; in which he wza sorry to observe men were pitted against each other to fight for a purse, in the presence of thousands of spectators, amongst whom were persona whose stations, fortunes, and education, he would have supposed would incline them to more honourable and gentlemanly amusements. For his own part, he heartily wished that some example would be made of persons actively engaged in. or by their countenance encouraging such disgraceful contras. Should a case ever come under his judicial notice when death was the result, he thought it his duty to declare, that he should carry the law to its utmost extent. By a late Act of Parliament (3d Geo. IV. e. 33.) Judges were empowered to men. tence offenders guilty of manslaughter to transportation for life. The degrading practice which had now become so preys. lent, renders it necessary to make a severe example, for the purpose of checking it; and his Lordship had come to the resolution, in common with the other Judges, to inflict the severest penalties upon offenders of this description. Ile was happy, however, to say, that it was very much owing to the good minuet of the magic. tract in most counties of England, that this barbarous species of exhibition had been considerably abated. There were, however, be lamented, certain exceptions which had a contrary tendency. In his opinion, any magistrate who, by his open countenance or pas sire tolerance, in any respect contributed to the encouragement of such scenes, was unht for his station in the Commission. The less magistrates exerted themselves to put a stop to such practices, they might expect serious notice to be taken of their remissness from the highest quarter of the State. The Jury found the prisoners Guilty. The beamed Junta: sentenced Clarke and Fowler to twelve months' imprisonment aed Lard labour, and Burrows so six months imprisonment awl hard Lbour, in the house of correction. POLICE. NAX' Yesterday, a young titan of gentlemanly appearance and address, named James .4reloieaocu Itidaardsoos, appeared before the Lotto MayOß, upon a summits, to account foe the possession Dia bill of exchange for 601. which had been stolen. Mr. Dent (the owner of the bill) stated that on the night of the 13th of November last, as lie was passing down Ludgate-bill, at the time the premises of Messrs. Wilkinson were burning, his pocket was picked of his pocket-hook, enistalhing the bill in ques tion, which was drawn by a 3lr. Taylor, and accepted by a Mr. Sprigg. There were also other ttecunttes in the pocket.book, of those lie had some time since teceived information, bnt he learned nothing about the bill of exchange until within a few days, when lie was told titan it was in the possession of the defendant. The d2fendant upon being called upon to account for the pos session of the bill, stated that lie was informed on the 16th of Nov. by Messrs. Fascit, of St. Swithierlane, that a gentleman had called at their office with a bill, for which he wished to get Poysis Stock; that he afterwards received an anonymous note, on which he declined treating; that he then received a second note, with the name of Brantley on it, and enclosing the bill, in return for which he enclosed 2,300 f. in bonds, or twenty-ihre lUUI. Poyais bonds. The Loan Morena asked what wu the market price of those lOilf. Puyais bonds. The defendant replied, that they were at the time of the sale of them for the 501. bill at 21. each. The LORD MAYO a—" And did you take no numbers down, nor make any memoranda by which you could, if it were necessary, identity them ?" The defendant replied, that he did not ; that they were bonds of his own • that he was Lot a contractor for the l'oyais loan but an agent, ar:d that it was not the practice to bold the numbers of the bonds which were sold. A letter was here handed in to the Lord Mayor from the rim plmnant it Wat natal the 7th of November, and we believe was a notice given to the parties ou the ball that the defendant had nego tiated it. The LORD MAYOR asked whether this note was written after notice had been rect iced that the Dill had been stolen ? _ . The defendant replied in the affirmative, but he said that the date was minifeitly - by mistake—November instead of December. ifs added, that he had received no specific notice not to otgociate the bill. The LORD MAYOR—No specific notice ! Why, sir, had you not been intsormcd that it was stolen.--and would it not have been the duty of any honest man, under those circumstances at least, to wait until he saw what steps the party had taken ? The defendant replied, that lie had given his property for the bill, and certainly, as no positive notice had been given him nut to part with it. he thought himself entitled to negnciate it. The Loan 31 Avon, atter having consulted with Mr. nobler, said, he felt it his duty to order the defendant to find two bail for 1001., awl to cuter into his own ncognisances fur the sum of another Ito!. to appear and answer any charge that might be made against hire on the subject. Defendant—What, my Lord, have I not a right to negociate a bill for which I have given value? The Loan filAYolll—Certainly not, under such circumstances. The deft:Amnt said he might have acted erroneously. The tact was, he wu nut a commercial man. lie was an officer in the army, and, like many others, he dealt occasionally in the stocks. The complainant said that perhaps the defendant would be wil ling to give up the bill. The defendant slid he was, but not on condition of a compromise of his character. If it were publicly stated that the defendant did not consider that he came by the bill improperly, he would consent to lose his bond soil glee it op. The Lotto I.ve u I advise you to do so as the most honour. able course. Tne complainant nmseated to say the wool. The Lotto 31aYon ssitl, the least that could be said was, that 3lr. Itichardson had acted most incautiously. The defendant complained that the Lord Mayor had used some strong terms towards :tau which he felt severely. Tile bill was then put into the hands of Mr. /fabler, where it is to lie until the day bt mre it becomes due. slr. Ilicharclatit said I e would do all he could to trace the thieves. Ile had, he said, titre l'Oy:.i% Bonds, and he hoped he should get rid of them, and he never would take one again. The Limit 3I•It out, of cotase, required co sureties, and the parties left the 01.4 L. BOW—STREET. Yesterday a respectable looking man, who fermented himself to be an assistant at a private madhouse in the vicinity of %Vindsor. came to this office, accompanied by a lady, and the proprietor of Knight's Hotel, in ihiver.strcet, Piccadilly, and sought the advice and assistance of air RICIIAIiD 1111LX1E, under the following cir cumstanms _ _ . lie said that the name of the lady now before his ‘Voraltip was Blenkinsopp, and that she hail been fur a considerable time an in. mete of the asylum to which he belonged, and that on iVethicsdav she made her escape front the house, and came to Londom lfe followed and found her, and his request was, that Sir 11. Bantle would empower him, h' his authority or warrant, to convey her back, she having refused to pi, and placed herself undar the protection of the proprietor of the howl. The Illagistrate would perceive, by the document which he produced, that every thing was quite correct, and that he (the applicant) was property authorised. The applicant pre:lured a paper, which he said was a certificate of the insanity of the lady. (Vie had not 3! 1 epportimity of perusing this document, but we saw that it was written in a miserable hand, and was headed " Me morandum," and 59pled by " 14. Engstrom") :ir H. plarsz sit he did not know of any law which audio rind him to interfere. If the lady were a lunatic, the Lord Chan. celiac was her proper guardian, and application might be made to him upon the subject. He very much doubted the power of the applicant to touch the lady, upon the document which he bad pro duced. He thought, that where the liberty of a British subject was at stake, some more formal document than the one befote him should be famished. It oughtnt least to have two signatures in stead of only one. He certainly should not. even if be h ad the power, interfere upon such a certificate, or rather memorandum, as that. The applicant--Rut you may rely upon its being perfectly cor rect. Our establishment is well known, and is visited and 'lnc. tioned by the . Sir John Chapman (the late Mayor of Windsor) often visits us and (we understood the applicant to say) is acquainted with the present ease. Sir It. Dia w ts:—That may be; but you cannot, in my opinion, have any power to act here; you are in another county. Applicant—Yes, Sir ; but you know she escaped from us, and we could but follow her wherever she went. . . Ihe proprietor of the hotel here addressed Sir It. Birnie, and said the lady was extremely anxious to solicit the protection of the magistrates against the exercise of any such power as that claimed by the applicant. Miss Blenkinsopp, who appeared to be abort thirty years of age, and whose deportment was that of a perfectly Al-bred woman, said, in an earnest tone, and with considerable agitedon, that ►he hoped Sir Richard 'Wine would protect her, and not sulfa her to be taken back to the asylum of wretchedness and misery which she had just quitted. She could assure the magistrate that she was perfectly in her senses, and she hoped that now she should, by the shield of the law, be protected from a repetition of the sufferings which she had endured from her earliest youth, and the detail of which would excite the compassion of the most obdurate heart. There was no pretence whatever for keeping ber in confinement now, and she had every reason to believe that the document pro duced was not a genuine certificate. The proprietor of the hotel said, that the lady came to his house in a poet.chaise on Wednesday evening. lie was absent at the tints, but his waiters accommodated her with apartments and every thing she wanted ; and when he came borne she sent for hint, and communicated to him exactly the nature of tier situation. He gathered from her that she was a sister to Lady Newbold, and that she was connected with families of the first respectability ; and by enquiry he had satisfied himself that this part of her catement was true. She had, from the moment she entered his house, conducted herself ins perfectly rational manner, and no one who had attended upon her could discover the slightest indication of insanity, in word or deed. Sir IL Brawls asked Miss Blntkinsopp if she had any relations in London? . _ . Miss I.llenkinaopp said there were two gentlemen, her cousins, of the name of IVensuudey, who resided at 2.3, bevonshire.street, l'utland.place, and were there still, unleas they had died, or were gone abroad, within the last twelve 111011(1116 This she could not tell, for any letters addmaed to her where she had been were inter. cepted. One of them held a situation in the Audit Office. bit R. 61 tz—At all events, I shall not interfere in this matter. There is nothing at all in the manner of this lady to in. duce in my mind the slightest suspicion that she is insane, or any thing like it, but quit the contrary. You are at liberty, Madam, to go where yod please. as far u I am concerned. The applicant asked if he could not take her away without a warrant ? _ _ Sir B. 8111):12-1 shall answer no questions; hot I will say thus much, that if you meddle with the liberty G.t . a British subject it is entirely at your own peril: you must take all the consequences upon youmlf. 31iss ►lienkinsopp said she wished to remain under the protection of the hotel proprietor, until she could have communication with some friends. The proprietor said he was quite willing to take charge of the lady, and that every kindness and attention should be snown her. The applicant scented displeased with the result of the inquiry. Sliss Illenkinsopp retired, leaning on the arm of the hotel keeper. Sir It. Maxis: afterwards looked at the list of physicians is the Colin Calendar, and said he could find no •• Dr. k'ergussou." HATTON GARDEN. BENET'? SOCIEI tes.—The Secretary to the Ilene& Society, entitled the •• White Smiths' Society," appeared upon a summons, to answer the complaint of a man, named Kendall, who had been a tuemuer of the Sudety, and expelled under the following cir cumstances:-- The complainant stated, that he had been seventeen years a member of the Society; and about five months' ago, he was em ployed by the s ociety to do some work for them in his line of trade, which was regularly executed, and tnr which he afterwa.-ds fur nished his hill. The damiriation of his account passed the com mittee, without any observation being mails by them. as to the charge. and he was paid his full demand. Subsequently, however, some other members of the Society minutely inspected his account, and on consulting together, decided that there was an overcharge in tli: bill of 4.. In consequence of this, they immediately ex pAled him. Mr. Ilarmer's Clerk attended on behalf of the complainant. The Sroretary contended, that according to a certain article in the laws of their ft:ociety, any person found guilty of embezzling, or conniving in the embezzlement, of any part of the funds of the Society, should be instanter expelled. Ile submitted that the com plainant having overcharged the Society, and in fact, Ma brother tradesmen, to the amount of et, was iloofiteto a fraud on the tio. ciety, and came within the provisions of the article cited. Mr. Laiwa, the presiding Magistrate. was however of a eon. Crary opinion. lie conceived that imy overcharge in the com plainants' bill. its furnished to the society, was liable like other tradesmen's bills to be decided by arbitration; but it was an over. strained interpretation of the article quoted, to call it Em. healing or conniving at embezzlement." A coachmakev in Long acre, or any tashionable upholsterer, migh t as well be charged with embezzlement, by any gentleman employed him, if he thought :he amount of his demand exorbitant. Under these circumrtnnces (in which view of the case, Mr. Roar us fully concurred) he ordered the complainant to he imme diately reinstated as a member; and, that, if there was any error, or overcharge in his hill, it should be submitted to arbitration In the ' usual tradesmanlike manner. DIARY-LA-RONNE OFFICE. JOSIXSON •ND THE COACllMEN.—Yesterday, this 'pose %vying and ingenious raker-up of annoyance to all persons who render themselves liable to penalties under the Statutes, appeared at this office for the purpose of prosecuting ten informations against coachmen, for not adopting the precautionary measure of holding their horses heads' when stopping. Anticipating some oppposition, Johnson. like a skilful general, brought Mr. liumrssitErs, to work any legal business for him. The first case called on, was that of Mr. John Warms, the in formation charging him with leaving the Amershain coach near the Green Man and Still, hooking-tithe:, Osford.atreet, on the Sfrth ult. without having any persons at the horses' heads. layers proved that on the day named in the information, the de fendant d -ive the A ntersham comb to the oihce above named, and having thrown the reins over the horses' backs, alighted, and the horses remained in that situation for some minutes. . . Mr. WILL IA M S, of t i ray's Inn, after closely cm's-examining the witness, could rot shake his testimony, asked him if the horses were either restless, dangerous, or in any way placing the public in (faller* livers replied he only saw the offence committed, and did not trout le his head as to any of the consequences which might have arisen. Mr. NVILLTA 315 then contended at very great length, that within the meaning of the Act of Parliament the person sitting on the conch, is uddnubti:dir the proper person to hold the horses ; and as to the necessity of a person being at the horses' heads, he sub mitted it was not required by the statute in the sense meant by the informer. The Act of Parliament was at first caused, and he well recollected the circumstance, by a mail coach being left without any p_ suns to mind the horses, which starting of, caused the death of some of the passengers, and the severe injury of the others. lir. Gatrnrrt observed that that was not the only Mlle. lie knew of hundreilx of sitnilar instances. A friend of his had been Lace', and another scverely injurtd. 31r. Witi.eams, in continuation, cited several eases, which he contentied bore upon the case, showing that it was not in the con templation of the Act or Parliament that coachmen were obliged to carry persons to hold the hones whenever and wherever the coach stopped. .11r II tt MPIII ret, in reply, cited the words of the Act of Par liament. which explicitly states that some person must hold the horses on die coach stopping. The Magistrate overruled the objections made by Mr. Williams. There wns another information against the same defendant for a similar (-tierce on the nth. The nest cue was tliat of Mr. Kees, of the Wycombe stage, for an offence of this kind on the ?nth oh. Mr.IVILLIA N s cootended that the information wu faulty, as the parish was not properly described. The information describes! the offence to have been en mitred in St. Mary-la-bonne, whereas the house called the Green Man and Still wu in the pariah of St. June,. Some witnesses 'era called, who deposed to the fact mentioned by the Solicitor. This point was also overruled, u the information very distinctly described lilt place. Tne slakiscrate convicted Sir. Warner, on the Ent information, in the sum of ses. and costs; and on the second, in the sum of 15s. anti come. . _ _ keen wail convict:A in the latter sum; u was also Mr. Deacon. of the Hemel Hempstead stage, sad Mr. Ellin, of the Trh'g coach. There were two informations against each. The pieties gave notice of appeal. Johnson withdrew two informations. Letters from Iron, in Spain, of the 30th ult., state that several bands of Guerillas have appeared in the mountains which border the Ebro, near Viana, Soria, Logrono, San gueza, Rr. Tin , Royalist inhabitants of the villages lave all been called upon to arm themselves, and the earls of safer delivered by Government to the Constitu tionalists have been withdrawn, so that they are now ex posed to the vengeance of the fanatics. Letters from Bar celona state that nearly all the Constitutionalists who have been in prison for rcveral months, have been tried and con demned to tl:c galleys. Amongst them are many ns of great respuetability. The City, generally, is sairt r 4 s o o he in consternati:n at this act of tyranny. LONDON TITHES. REPORT or THE sT.BOTOLPH COMMITTEL gjett°teralthe R e p o r ryt h a eld tter. Fr Yd g leave to lay before ,th Lie 2d d„ o f f ol Y sept n m mi r t en t C e mn i t e re r t i n ast, tiee ted ' no to ret w ernn th b e e Parishioners the result of their labours hitherto, i n e ll Il rotirt of those important duties committed to tbsir char ge c ~""tilos Vestry. the 5.4 In the first place, they have to record, with lhigh the general feeling which has been most uneqatreenfir in regard to the justice of resistin g th e Lay Inipropriai,;eier this Parish. and the able and judicious remarks of the ?ebb p n 7 ' Irt favour of dium of Parliament.obtaining a fair and equitable relief throuo Your Committee, in accordance with the Resolutions of • Vestry, proceeded at the earli est opp ortun i ty to inveangate th e piety and necessity of questioning the L e y e. right to his claim, and, under th e a d v i ce of Counsel, fees ttQselves bound— on btnhalf of the l'arishioners at iar;e. ea ,.. proper means fur resisting the sam e ; an d w i th this view they . sidered it advisable that the suit then already in.e. t „ eed Mr. John Blenkarn, an inhabitant alto had stood fors ard io fusing to comply with the lay Impropriator's detnet,d, defended for the general benefit of t h e l'arish. , That in order to provide funds for the legitimate defen ce . Parishioners, your Conuuittee e applied to har. and f oun d a n u , ready concurrence on the part of thc owners and occupies t mises in the parish, proportionably to contribute toward. fund ; and at the head of the contributors your Connnitwe h t , great pleasure in announcing the nam es c f Sir James shay. r,, the Alderman of the Ward, Sir C. Fl ower, B art. am! did' and Jesse Watts Russel, Esq. M. P. ; b ut your Coneilitt'e.ee7', omit to state, that the Honourable Court of Director, of the tit India Company, in consequence of a presioss agreement sine into with the Lay Impropnator, considered themselves prod,i o front assisting towards the contribution, and co-operating main, parishioners in their defence ; although, if any measure to elle. y general arrangement in all the parishes not protected wa s 'cape* , they professed their readiness to concur and assist there's. Your Committee, in directing searches to bemade in ela r d thee original grant of the Impropriathm of King James 1. tO us, soon after which grant t c same was conveyed frr :hen & sideration of 400/., and the subsequent title of the preset? lathe. ' proprietor, have ascertained by reference to the late, deeds cumbrances affecting the same, appearing upon the 11-rvtr e r, Middlesex, that the Rev. Thomas Kyneston, the ancestse ed present Impropriator, purchased the impropriation and tiglit of ed. vowson for the sum Of 11,410/. ,r at which time the annu,lllA:tt of tithes for both divisions o:' the parish, namely. in 10r.60 Ind Middlesex, was under the sum of 13V01. : and the said firm.. mas Kynaston offered the same to the parish, with the re re . sentation of the Minister, for a perpetual annuity of ses and it appears that the same amount of tithes so contin s .e long series of years afterwards, but before the time of the ...tat the present linpropriator's father in 11104, was inerrawd I 1,0011, per annum; and the present Impropriator, by sani%ii Tanen of the same, has now increased the amount to between tat and 5,000/. per annum in the London division alone; and:Et ship of this burden upon the parish is materially increased. ;Iv , : Committee, in the course of their investigation, having the reason to conclude, that the whole of the parish was origiaall;p7. tccted by customary payments. That it also appears, by reference to the said Registry for 31!. diesel. that the resent Impropriator, in addition to a resicksta on the tithes in r esent llnpropvlatcr, in addition to a rel:c'au, on tire tithes in 8114, of 6401. per annum. he, in the mu Li;. mortgaged the same for the sum of 23.0t10/., and in kola, tor t , sum of 10 MM. and subsequently for a sum rim stated in die as morial of Registry which large amounts clearly shew the tut. mous slams which the Itopropriator calculated upon receiving fre the parishioners at this recent period, under the presumed ea:c Lion of the Decree of the 37th Henry Vlll. ; although he redec. eel the land tax upon his tithes in the year lBora, upotian csurtaaa of the sante at the rate of 350/. per annum. ' Your t'omesiteee, in the course of their proceedings, appvilrees Sub-Committee of their own body, more immediately to deer land assist in carrying into effect all necessary steps thee nick deem expedient for the defence of the parish *cairn the ley Impropnator's claim, the said Sub-Committcs reporting ban time to time the result of their proceedings to your General Cm. mittee. That pursuant to a Resolution passed at the General Voter, held on the 2d of September last, a petition from the pane-. loner, to the Honourable Court of Common Council, prayire tf.e.r aid and assistance, was prepared, and the same was prewntee the said Court, on the :Ist of (ktobe► last, when it ass mously referred to the Special Committee of the t'orporxien poirted in relation to Tithes, to examine and act therein as fa/ shall be advised, and report thereon teem time to time t);:e Court. That in pursuance of such reference, your Commitrec.nathe2rn day of October last. attended the said Special tat:it:titter of to Corporation, who directed the fullest assistance to be given by de city officers in defenceof this parish, and in pursuance of the mod. mendation of the Court of Common Council, orderer that sere. ral other parishes affected by similar claims shruld be ir.r.J to confer on the propriety of an mated application to Putter,. for the repeal or alteration of the Statute 37 henry V.111.`.1v,:z.i. tuting a more fair and equitable payment of tithes. Your Connnittee, in addition to the steps taken on behalf Pf parish, as before mentioned, hate, in pursuance of the spirit several Resolutions passed at the General Vestry held on of September last, and from a sincere desire to enter into rr. rangement with the Impropriator, fur making to him a fair ri reasonable compensation by annual payment or otherwise. the•4l the medium of Parliament, instead of the present heavy and pressive rate of tithes, made an application to the legal advionv4 Mr. Kynaaton for that purpose, and to include in the arritigeccr: the payment of an annual sum to the officiating 3linistert oftc parish, who arc understood to be wholly destitute of payret except from surplice fees; but your Committee deeply regret inn, after various correspondence upon the subject, the legal adc‘n of Mr. Kynaston stated that he declined to enter into any tr;-.1 thereon, leaving the parish to the only alternative of such course for the defence of the parish against his unjuq as a Court of Equity or an application to Parliament may affac.... Your Committee, under the advice of C ounse l, hav e therotte ed to defend Mr. Blenkarn in the suit instituted ager.t proceeded to defend Mr. Blenkarn in the suit instituted agao.t him by the Impropriator for the payment of 2A. fkl. in the per.. and have pleaded the non-enrolment of the decree under shisi the claim is made; since which Mr. Kynasten's solicitors he; obtained an order to amend his bill, but such amended biL:sto: yet filed. _ Upon the subject of an application to Parliament, your Cornet. tee beg to refer to the annexed Circular, received by the shut,. wardens of this parish, from the Town Clerk of London, by dim. don of the Tithe Committee of the Corporation. The enliiir reasons urged for the necessity of such application to PaThane.: are so just and forcible, that your Committee reijurst that they :v.! be considered as adopted, and taken as part of 'M A Report: and h . ; to add their own serious conviction, that even in case the dinent: circumstances in which the several parishes are plated in Match t. each other, and in regard to tithes, should ultimately renders:int: 4 application to Parliament impossible, yet the sinigie of the ps rishioners of this parish, and the grievances under 'inch they lsboer from the Lay Impropriator's clam, renders it absolutely Emus' that they should at all events apply to Parliament lot row,' t and an equitable future arrangement. Your Committee cannot conclude their present RepeTt expressing, on behalf of themselves and their fellow paristionert. their deep obligation to the Honourable Corporation of Lndon. kr their prompt and ready attention and assistance to the moan( ac inhabitants; neither can they withhold their high PatriTZIIIV: thanks to such portion of their fellow-citizens in different Pin" as have stood forward to resist the claim made under the `ratite and Decree 37th Henry VIII., which resistance has lid to su.h neficial results in the parishes of St. Dunstan in the West ird at. Andrew, IlElbom. And your Committee fees it a duty to vs:: : that the steps adopted towards obtaining the name effect, • Vincent Punier, Esq. in St. Helen's parish, and Mr. / rebnck Shore Nodin, in the parish of St. ()lave, llart.strcet. LOW" bet! to marked and particular thanks. And your Committee fed ss.,t lied that the parishioners of this parish, in zealously and anitntir resisting the Lay Impropriator's claim, and with one coenn.o: l general Exertion to obtain relief, are only pursuing the pat . to themselves, their families, and success. ; and having .I'. - on their aide, it is not ton much to say—." Great is the 0 -i" truth, and it shall prevail." All which we respectfully submit. t'te 34 of December, Ms BIRTHS. „ On the 29th ult.. at Ballygiblin, county Cork. the t a " Wrixon Becher, Esq., 31. P., of a son, who only earttre'. r 1 birth a few hours. On the sth instant, at Wells. Somerset, the lady or Ir .: 11. N. Drake, Esq., of a son and heir. 111ARRIEI). On Wednesday, at St. tieorge's. Ilanover.square, The s• : Roe, Esq., of Sculcoates, county of York. nephew of Sit !;:' Bassett, to Mary Anne, only daughter of James Brandvr, Ltti St. John's M'ood. At Edinburgh, on the 2d instant. James F.rkford, of the fish regiment of Bengal Native Infantry. to 31, 7' daughter of James Alexander Haldane, Esq.. of DIEM On Monday last, universally. re•zretted, Thomas Smith, Lit Berated Lodge, near Bognor, agstl ;9. On Saturday, Mra. Eustace, relict of the late General raiti7- and mother of Sir J. Eustace. On the 4th instant, aged 71, John D'Oy Iltetinr.s, Peaton Lodge, llama. On the Sth instant, Dr. Aletander P. Buchan. lace: street, son of the author of the a:II-known ork on D ns ,: I divine, late senior l'hysivian of Wes•ni..•sea On Thursday. at the Moor, near litu;:tm, Bert .ordslitt....• Lloyd Harris, Esq. Barrister, and ~:etratu !.t •• county. At Brecon, Mr. Wm. AVilliants. mason, in the !nth jp . age. 1k has lett a widow marl% two t...tra older than This venerasle couple lived hamitly tog;ther for lis which period. within the last month, &tout first became too weak to leave the hoc, , Mr. W. :14111:ley ar."- panied his wile to church every 5.ihtt.t•`,.4!.......„.5e - - - - HIGH WATER THIS DAY .l'r LONDON 111:11',.. )!lorning 411 min. after 4. Afternoon 0 ann. silty Primed at Tli IC Bit I TIS /1 PH ES:-. rifice, by J. W. API " 5 ' 181, kitrand, and rablisitad by li. t. alums, same Pi"'s II 1/ .. No ilfE . o rece!/ Illthlmilli rs esp: e treEtaPaTj T "pece i ttld: n edf d ic( t foamy, la reilula," 'OTIC V corm AM,.' Hu MA Banc town ol I) II Rely Ms hie 314) , and Ws. Hal! Hersen. in CM in That the larearT ne, l '. Tenter tire Tuft and after Pro Ma l, ad ads I Teodw ley algal Aotoui :leas mad 'cads at 'the same. Ad in thi him. Partiettle woe Chief been the PALL) CH CA Sir E J. D. AlCil J. L. And/ 0. Arbuthz 31. J . 8. Bat, E. E4O H. Browne, Sr W. Chi Ban. 31. W. Coi H. Hi _ _ .It. Y.. It has 1 fn tthe! added :ted for In the of the pre paid never sorts. 7 Departma served um the ASSUTI A om the b pr enefit All clai and the Arbiostio Persons doted vei peonuim I GRA' of PoToraidt duster ab ?beset, Althorn other disci at late a; Suntbtiek of the p the rein, Pk in the mid plow fatly doe whieb ars &Winfield 1 , 117 dem Improved Dt Draw ing ot timbal dead Thou before Aid on ...Andra rit .".• I _ 1 , Chi,' Mid 3.14 11ed 7 4 MAW