The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1809-02-11 00:00:00

totaled a character; bat rather, by trearlintreta tiously, to be gore of the ground over winds he moved. For his own part, he declared he would conduct himself throughout the inquiry with utmost impartiality, without favour or affection, it mover united the rank of the parties. Sir AierllVii WELLEstAy bore testimony to the claims of Capt. Tuck to promotion, from the length and variety of hi, palAt b(nViveN Mr. WAIII)Ls expres-•.d his wish, that the letters of Mr. Doilov'm 'night be read, frow the manner in which they w..re alluded to.kst eight. This gave to it discussion hew far they were ndinissible iu eyillsocc,without proof offered to the House bow they were obtained, or of their being of the hand-writing of Mr. D onovan . Th.y gentlem w wie. at length called to the Bar of the House, the letters were roduced to him by the Clerk, mid he owned thew to be of his hand writing. The following is tla. substt o of the letters identified by Mr. Dooovall to haveliestu written by him to Mrs. ClAlke, itiel reatl by the Clark at the Table :-- Oct. 11. 140.4. MAR. n4Dalt—l understood a• Desorry of llercCird is vacant, and that it is in the solo gift of the Duke of Portland. I would give a thonraiiil pounds fur it. It 111111 Al he filled twat Ratuniay. Mr. Glame is my particular friend, nod I would to much to aerie hue ; he is a good scholar, is sell connected, and ':aturii to the Duke of Cam s :dge ;be h. Uector of lianwel: The money will he placed • at, AC. S.C. AC. J. DONOVAN. Claurlcsoitreet, St. iluaies'a, Or: do, ties. Dr %It 3IADA,3I—SouIe (muds of the Rev T. Demody, M.A. arc cutreinely desirous of promoting him its ths Church, and there appears to he a very favourable °ppm , taniiy in the Deanery of Sarum' Iwitig vacant make appli cation ts the Duke of Portland. A party of Ladii s (onsougst will" is Lady Cardin:l) are subscrilii ig rhino guineas for t1+..141V1.,Ct It of t!iis Chaplain to the Duke ut Gloucester and litshon of I have a letter, whit+ these in what high favour Mr. Besiely sis with the Lrdow, but they do sot wish to let hit, huolw (tem whom the motley comes, nor that it is owing to thews such a worthy Ran * selected fur preferment, &e. he. Le. Norember 16, Ist*. Dean HeDe.m.—The ewe ..f lospettur of the t'its. twos a now vacant, by the deilh of Mr B o oti e . 11,,. Luke of Beaufort has applud for it. I shall do myself Cite pla sm, (hi yea, to make Pi - lar VrOpUliiii4i4 on the, Con you procure th‘ Pnytuasieesh:p of the second battalion fur Sind. ?" asc. ita. Dereat'A r 11, nos. • I)LAR utucL I had to,: the rleteeere >eciu4 you ott Satur.lay eveoir,A iheu I Ceelell 4,11 )OU, is it arse the only ties,. I Ira. out xi ee 1 ut:..lay, ae.caott.t 61 tat wound. The Say.tomth•te.M , r horeryostattp lite (7.1 e. taisr• is vocal i, cats you i .ro, me i ear to - u-1. IA; Hilo!, or-ta rtish a curreory Cati..et poe. the the W,.tts's pare fa J stmat y nest ? As :o toe Pa„urtstee.bi l l o. the sero.ol battalion, I ant ready toe .choir, sad ‘ri•h to ate yol to etustalt. I shall be at La.,, • it,a e•eui.,g, and Walsh: to hoar toe ',onion of scan tar, wed dun to your weigtetullirlsoad to. swarm,. D. MADAN. Dereneoer 41, 11.011. I Sul daily p:azucti about the Savamoh-tteMer app tai;. niece, Ili- land wardership, and the payuratetsbip of the 'aura Eustatius. Mr. Hughes was very desift.am nail I 61110 , 1k1prescaat has totaptineuts to you. 1 air eon esved at fit doing it be(we. These letters were ordered to be entered on the minutes. The ITTOIMEY.GVIZRAL theft stated. that lee had just received a letter from Getiond Clarenug. me•tionirig. that as Mrs. Clarke hol alluded to ins name iii her testininuy i , he was desirous of be ing examined at the bar as to the reason of Ins calling at her laeose, and that his statement would tend to itivalithate her veracity. Ile theretlite p.opersed that Geoieral Closeting alsonlil be called, tf :itch were the pleasure of the Committee. Souse discussion took place ou this point, his evi‘nre being olgtocted to in the; prevent stage of the procredingN, The SPEAKEa stated, that be knew sot upon what ground that letter could be r.:aet as evidence , but it might be- it sufficient grouse! to admit the testimony of a %sited:is wishing to be exsittluv.l ou the subject. General Clavetiug was thou called, but eat not found in attendance. The Cosnenittee then proceeded to the exami nation of a forme: Witness. who.o Mr. Wardle stated was dearness or ue.rkio4 sum alteration iu Lis evidence; that Willies* was Mr. I'earsou, late Littler to Mrs. Clarke. (By 4 11 r. % ANIMA.) Q. Du you recollect the period at which his Royal Dighoese the Commander-in-Chief and Mrs. Clarke left Leitrim), to thy stammer of I ort.3 ? 'nos examinatiole MAY ohirete.l to by Mr. PRA.. CLVAL and' Mf. who urgeu, that if the purpose of rectillhig this Waimea was to rectify his evidence. he ought to hear his former testimony read over. After a few words from Mr. Sruects Bouttlie, Mr. WILLIAMS WV !ISL. Ma. Rota, and Mr. BARMAN, this proposal was osreed to, utol tilts Withers recalled. The Chairman then inquired if there were any part of that evidence ou wtsi'is the IVittiess wished to make any ole,ervatinits • alterations. or addi tions I—A. No alteration ; hut I wish to stole, that on the day the Duke went to %Veyinteeth, abut eleven o'clock eat night. I was sent out to get a 101 l changed. I went out and got chauge read gave it to Mrs. Clarke. She looked it ovenond said it was all right. The Doke of :'ark was prestut .then Mrs. Clarke gave me the bill, sod whets I re t itrued lurr the change. (By Mr. S. Bemuse.) Q. With whom have you bud conversation re. spertiog your evidence since you were last here ?- 4. Not with an t e body. 9. Hsi the Winless seems Mrs. Clarke since that No. 1 Rare not. Did the. %Vii tress see Mrs. Clarke when Ile ri-tired from the Her ou the booster day t—A. I iiiig•ht have Wed her, lint I did riot sireak to her. Q. Do .1l•wwok to you. —A. She just bored her awl said " Pearson. have yo u bes•ii ea ■u,ineid !" To which I unswered. " Yes, Ma'am." Q. Are yen, pw-itive no other periont spoke to !lot on the: subject or list evidence you gave here. lose you to them ?—A. I met latilovick in the Pa. k, u.1:1 he raid b u tt I must tie wor.akeu respectire tai-. „owed to. Q. Wed that oil ollieb proved lirtweesi you and 11 , was ell which pureed, e•;rept he anal, he maw:sal:ere.' there w:w. a bill lerement to rk:ni oinr morning for a differed purpo ee, iniel lie thooglit I must have mistaken that bill la hich leas early for test pow, lei for the other one 1 ribcd. tity es Mealier.) tJ. IhJ ;Jo Wier to elr. %Varil4e to alter ;•our 1 r testimony I celled open Vra anil told him that I now recollected I had received a bill from Mrs. Clarke, that 1 went to get clisnge for it that evening, and returned it in the presence of the Duke of York. Q. What was the amount of the bill von got the .chilitge for?—A. I think it was loot. but am not certain. Q. Where did you get that hilt chang ed?-1. I got it chuaged at Me ss r s . 13yli e ld an d Bridge confocticiews, iu Were-street. I think Bridgeinati :old his wife changed it for Inc. Q. Did you apply at any ether place to get that bill changed ?—A. Yes; 1 applied in Bond street. but could not get it there. Q. I low low:, is it since you left Mrs. Clarke's service ?—d. About three years ago. Q. Have you seen her frequently since ynu quitted her service ?—.l. I never saw her before 1 saw her at this Q. Did yon out bee. Mrs. Clarke in her chariot a clay or two before you gave your evidence iu this House, or on that very day e—A. Thr day before that alluded to, she seat for me to Itiaker-v , trect, where she was in her carria g e, to ask me if 1 ever changed any Lill, or knew of one being changed by any other persnu ? 1 said I recollected Lu dovic d g se, and that I did so too, on the night the Duke went to Weymouth. She said she re collected that perfectly well. Q. Have you made any communication to her since that period, or do you know that it was men tiotted to her, you had a wish to alter your evi dence ?—.1..1 did not, nor do Ikon* any other per son did. (By Lord FOLISTON E.) Q. IL,w do )ou account for the circumstance that you did hot recollect these couventatioas %vitro you were last here? A. 1 did not recoltect it. because had, a very bad head-ache, which affects guy me ,,,,,,y, and at the. *ante time when I was asked about the Dake's contents. I thought I roust not sower (illations which related to Mrs. Clarke's servant. ? Q. the Witness labouring under that in dial)(411t1011 110 M I—.l. No, I hot. (By Air. PERCEVAL) Q. Thee it was not merely ow.ug , to your head ache) that you lid not state the whole circuit'. staaces en you. ,art reatui.ustion?—A. It was owing to that, and oty tieing a stranger, 1 did not kuow whut to say. Q. Did you recollect what you have now stated, erlwil you were here before To the beet of my retoliecisou, but I could not tell the ruin of the bill ; i hr. a now recollected it was 1001. Q. Did you know. before you came to the Bor. this ereidsho that you might be exit iii iii ed on tins point P—A. No ; I did not. Q. Do.you recollect what time of night it was whets Ole Di.ke set off to Weymouth `roi ls one o'clock iu the nioruiug. (By Mr. Ft! LILEtt.) Q. Did you not know. the lost tau on were at this Bar, von were to tell the truth bare dons, so to tbe best of toy kuowledge. (By :kir. BA IMAM.) Q. How could you mote that you had spoken to nobody utter your evidence. when out iiiiiiirdistaly afterwards state that you had spo;.i.n to Mr. War. CDC sad to Ludorie?—A. I did hot thii.k hot I then said. (By erdonel VraLE Q. How is your &sensory so perfect OA every otlarr part of the transaction. and yet sn nap: ricct as not to he certain of the amount of the mar cr.o got changed?-4. •I um out certain of the amount of that stole ; to the lie,t of my recolleetion it was one hundred pounds. (By Mr. A. Sum.) Q. Do you know bliss Taylor ?—A. I have tress her at Mrs. Clarke's. Q. Viii she frequently there ?—A. She wag. Q. Ira , * she ever there when Ow Duke was there, cud in his company ?—A. I do lint recollect ,erto; her in his company ; but she might be in the house. Q. Was she usually part of the society when the Duke of York we there ?—A. 1 never saw her in company with the Duke of York Q. Was she very intimate with Mrs. Clarke ? A. 1 believe very intimate. [Here the Witness withdrew.] Mr. SIMIDAN ohs•rvod, there bud been at tempts to invalidate the tettimony of this Wituevs, yet ht did nut observe that he bad coatiadiettad his evidence at all. Mr. PeIt:LVAL objected to taking up time in making comments in this stage of the business. Mr. siERIDAN added, that he was not making comments, but was only °Laming un the mode of examination adopted by the Committee; and if he thought that made objectionable, be saw no reason why he should not state his sentiments in the course cf the examination; mid, in doing so, it was necessary• the Witness should withdraw. It his statement, as ta the amount of the note, b• doubted, why not call Bridgetnato or Iris wife to the bar? Mr. Fut.t.t.a-- 1, I think I Ih:►re n rigid to put a question to the NS'ittiess, fur the purpose of know ing if he hid Any medical not for that detteitnicy of mcmory he t►as she's% on this neensiun?"—(%o, iso, no '1 Ti tVitnclo w.tr and asked—What do you understand to Ik the profession of Ails* Ta)- tor ?—A. t do not hone what she war, I um quite a stranger to her. By Lord Fet.kirrosr..) Q. Do ynu recollect of Miss Taylor ever dining in coropstiv with Um. %hake. in Cloucester-place —A. 1e%.1 liOe Q. 1./14 thr Mike ever dine there at the same time?—A. No. This Witness was then o►derrd to %alphas, ; oust the split one called was General Clavt.ri (By the fIfTIRYF.f.GENF.RAI..) Q. ni.l tau cend nie a toter, stating yaw nisi' to n eilVaine.l at the far, rel a tive to your culling on Mr,. Clarke?—A. Yes. 1 did. Q. When did ;on first kisow Airs. Clarke I believe about six year* ; bat Idu nut ex tut ly know. Q. Did the Witness mall at Nits. Clarke's house rucontly, and .for what purpose ?—A. Yes, I did call, and it was in consequence of a report I had heard, that every person in town, who had leild any culvemitiii.i with her, was to be called before this Dm). House to speak lei to her veracity. hating heard, auras:pa others, my 113IQC 111i1OdUCCdp acitlt•e;sed • letter to Colonel Wardle, of wliich I have a copy in my pocket. This letter wai acourd ingly produced and resit by the Clerk at the table ; the substance of it was us follows : " Si has been intimat. t to me that a letter has, or is to be sailremed to you, be Mrs. Clarice, wherein my name is iutrialuceil, as beim; capable of speaking to her verseitV• wish it to be with.h.io n, as,: ',clog a fansilv man, my usitivrs fur visiting her he mistaken hevities which, the evi dence would fail in its object, 151 she told use she hind with Mr. Mellish." he N. duets then contioned—" I accordingly called on Mr. V 1 ardlr, :o'er 4 , •inting that letter, and htated, if it were 11r4. Clarke's intention to summon use before the tionse, that my triikare, so far from coufirming, would rather impeach her veravity,a3 It W:1.1 not above a month sago she wad she was lking with Mr. Mellish. Alter leaving Colo nel Wardle's house, it luy in my way to pas by 'Mrs. Clarke's door, and it then occurred to we it might be proper to state the baffle Wing to her. I eonseque!gly called, but *he denied herself, and rent men me4sage of her being extremely ill in bed ; but if I would call again iii two hours 1 might ate her. It was not in any power to do so ; lint I called a quarter after tire, and did itui are her. Tice purport of my calling was to inform her,. that if she did call upon one as a willies:, I mien lie under the necessity of stating what I have related. Upon the suggestion of Mr. A oast, that pert or M ro. Clarke's evidence of yesterday, relative tot se nerd! Cluveriug having twice called on her in the course of the duy, was mud. After this, the same Member begged leave to observe, that tlit evidence of this Wituesa was no contradtctiou to &Ira. Clarke. The %Vitners hating previnealy withdrawn. MI:14 recalled by the ATTORIIEIf-GMILAL, anti further interrogated. - I; there any thin 4 else you wish to state ? A. if I urty treat to the accuracy of the Morning Papers. [This mode of answering was objected to by the CHA1R314,14 If I may trust to the accu racy of the reports which 1 have heard, I understood my name was brought forward, last night. as having, oil a former occasion, endeavoured to ineuence an Flouourable Member of this House in his vote. Now this is erroneous ; for I never spoke to hint, it being perfectly unnecessary to'do so, as that Gentleman alwaya voted upon that saute bilk on which he then gave his vote. (By Mr. Simittnan.) Q. Did you ,tern yourself to britt ,, up Lord Julio Campbell to vote ou th e D e f ence Iltil in Pt° or Inigi ?—A. To the best of my recollection never wrote or spohe to hint on the suffice. Q. Did you of tiny time during your acquaint ance with Mrs. Clarke, promise to scud her recom mendations of any officers for promotion I—A. Never, Sir; but it will be necessary to explain my answer more fully. A boot six weeks ego I received a letter from her, st.ttitig her itacliuutiun to see me. I called upon her, aid she Wormed me that she was extremely anxious to promote a young man, it Lieutenunt Stunner, who was thee in the Toth regiment, mid that his Royal Highness .the Duke of York, as well as Mr. Greenwood, were equally ausioos about his promotion, She istforrned the that a regulation was clntered into, that upon a Member of 'Parliament or General Ulcer writing a letter of recommenda tion to Colonel Gordon, that that would be taken into consideration. I informed her that I. was not :ware of any such regulation, and that I must know that that person was a deserving clam. ratter. She aecordi og lj, about two days afterwards, inclosed to ones letter, signed by Lieut. Col. Ross, of the , 20th Regiment, stating that Lieut. Sum ner was a deserving character. In order to be sa tistitsl that it was written by that Geutleinen, 1 went to Greenwood's, and ntade inquiries of the Clerk, who informed me it was the signature of Colonel Ross. 1 afterwards itiforined her it would be absolutely necessary that a pro per letter should be written upon the soh. Ject by a relation of this young gentleman, whom she stated to be a Member of this Ilouse. Ace,,rd ingly • letter came from the Temple, signed "-- Simmer," but was so absurd in its style, that I sent it to her, stating, that if she meant it as a juke, it was a very bad one, nod that 1 could not send such a letter to the War-fillice. She, a few days afterwarde, sent tar another letter, ti hich I have now iu Inv pocket, hut of it 1 took no notice, in conse qpence of the extreme absurdity of the former. This letter wits produced and read, the substance of it wait— SIR, January 17, 1309. My brother, Lieutenant Sumner, of the vuth Regiment, king desirous to purchase promotion in the 29th, 1 take the liberty of requesting you o ill take 'ore..ary steps fur that purpose, by recommending him to tlte Duke of York. 1 iun, Sir, yours, &c. SI ',IN Ell. Q. Did Mrs. el.irke represent to you who this Mr. Sumner was from whom this letter came?—A. She informed 'lir. on my first interview, that the young man she ware recommending, nos a uephe•w to Mr. Sumner, ,11.1'. for Surrey. 1 never was in formed who the person was who wrote the letter, but ; have iseen isnotined there is 110 such petsuu its existence. (By Sir THOMAS TS:ATOM.) Q. What anessage did yea Irate. at any time you called on Mrs. Clarke. and with whom? —A. I left no other one. than that I should cull at a quarter after lire, as she had appointed that hour for being at home. Q. MI the g-ntluman who was with you If ave any message in your licariug ?—A. There aus no person with mr. _ _ Q. At either of the times ?—A. I certainly said that h wag extremely c..traorilitiar that she ..tiould hare gone out when She had tixed that tune for seeing me. Q. Di.l you leave any message pointing out what wa the purport of our visit to her:—A. I left no message for her at all. Q. I unsletstiand that you impeach the testi mony of Mrs. Clarke. from the circumstance of her stating herself as living. with Al r. llcllish ; was it the Mr. Mellish who is Member for Middlesex ? —A. She did not say he was the Member fur 113 ii the iVittiess any. and whist reavon, to know 11,..t Mrs. Clarke did nut live niiiii.r thi• ;mite, ofa Mr. lrlrllinh 2—A. That 1 only un der.toiiii from the testimony &danced before fits Honourable two evening. ago, viiiiirebv it mai proved that she did wit with Air. Q. Then win 1 to wailers:et:A yow to -ay that you have ne otli e r mono to impeach the testimony Mrs. Clarke, but the litateuletit that she lived and _ the protectiou ot Mr. blellich Not .ply 1 am utyresetat aware of. . _ _ Q. (lure yon ally other reason, independent 4 any circumstance you hare either heard or read of to impeach her tcstinaony ?—A. 1 cartinuly.db ecitierM.e her to be worthy of belief, from her hit,. on me in the ma n ner she did, trout the variety of eross-evalence 'he delivered t ,, this flub. ift.use. Upeett the em g, of Mr. ADAM, the Witta- s was ordered to ‘,,itlidrary„ and he stated as his , bb i,, n. that the last ;limnr could trot stand db of tie, vvi,lenot tot the owoetrit. Sir 'room** Tturum slid, lie certainly vcry ditlvrently from the Ho:mumble Geutletaa When w Ni upou • the !louse to intern► gate him, not only in support of hiv own charm:. ter, but to iutpet u the to:Alimony of another al.. ness, it wait certainly proper to lay open the Piaui., alas infnrinatinii and his motives. lie vholid have been unwilling to have put the tpie,tiou, t..„e lie had rearm' to think la: would have ge.rn sin aims er; but Wore it had been given, the IL v and the public haul a right to kuuwou what Oro . hr iutytached the crerlilulityot a %Vltava.. thetrfwe tiinti4ht the matter should regatta in stated in the sumutet. Mr. ADAM %NW. bat lllsonly motive wit, that no periam called to the Bar should advert t nth:: pi wed iu this Howie: for althongli it is *tat •it. 4.4 siletitio, yet it can he no authority proper to be r.. !waited to that /louse. Ile had. himever, no tint. to its remaining as entered. The 'll . Wits then recalled, and rather i:i terrogitted by Sir "•l'uoicts TUITON. lc ; question repented mod answered as before. Q. I wish to know how Mrs. Clarke has iinpf..ea' upon you ?—A. Ity lining informed me that s:.e is living under the protection of Mr. which, I understand, it not the case. Q. How do p.m umb rdtaud that wit to be the vase ?—A. From its having been proved to he tee contrary before this Ilootiutable mars.) _ _ 44:Have you any other reasons beside* tinne you have stated, to believe that sh , i has imposed upon you?—A. None that I 'tin at lin:wait aware Of. (Bli Mr. Du NIDAS.) Q. Ilow )ou kuow she bus iinpipiell on yot by ptittiut; a false name to the lettsa you Lase wentioued ?—A. I did riot state she had imp:v.4 on me un that aerc iiiii t. By Mr. WARDLE.) Q. Are you Ko l a:limes! with Aims Taylor ?.—A. if it he the Miss Taylor who was exattistsed hut. I certainly have sees* her hefore. Q. flare you frequeutly scam liter at Mrs. Clarl 's ia Gloucester-place?—A. 1 may probably h..ve sees* her twice or three tunes there. 44., Was bile not there us the friend and compa nion of Mrs. Clarkz when you saw her at th ft place ?—A. I certainly believe not, Sir ; Mrs. Clarke told me she kept a boarding-school at Chelsea. Q. Was she not on a visit to Mrs. Clarke, as collating with her for the day at (41oucester-place' —A. That is more then 1 can reply to, not 'reel -I.!oing buying ever been et Gloucester-place snore than once. (lig a MEMnER.) Q. I wish to know if such mu r•Tulation existed as that which 111 re. Clarke stated to you at to pro motion ?—A. I uertainly had informed inystif test any application coining from a Member of Parke. meld, or any Commanding Officer, %mild meet with attention from the Commander-in-Chief, but I certainly did not understand that there witc vny positive regulation, such es she had described to hare taken place dining the tune, I was abrsud uu 'service. Q. In what •respect did the representation she gave of this regulation differ from that of the Corn inander-in.Chief?—.l. They differed most widely, in consequence of no such regulation having beau issued. (By Mr. WESTERN.) Q. I wish to know whether you bad any other communication with Abs. Clarke, rehstive to the subject of this Committee, besides that yea base mentioned ?—A. I certainly had no other co-si rnuilication, 'nor view, tivnides what I have stated; namely, that I did not wish my name to come is:, as the world might naturally iaiugine, than lett i ng a Comm •atihn with a lady of that sort, our in timacy was of a crimistal nature, which, on my honour, did not exist.—,'LersgAter.) (By Mr. Dr asuay.) Q. You bare said that she stated she was ender the protection of Mr. Mellish; what reason did she give you to induce you to believe that the perstns alluded to was the Member for Middlesex ?—A. If I am correct 1 did usst saiv it was the Member Inr Middlesex. (By Mr. Qum.) Q. Doming stated that you called twice on Mu. Clarkeoo request that eons name might not lo• introduced, what motive has induced you to cos:..: down and give this evidence ?—A. Because n,v name having appeared iss the public 1)61411,1 wished to state fully the fact as it mem red. (By Mr. I.eaet:.) Q. Are you acquainted with Mr. Dottier ?—A. By no other memos thao through the public pris.u. Q. Do eon recollect haring had auy cutlet:Na tion with Sirs. Clarke upon political transactews, previews to fro I or 1110:1?—A. I do not recoil, tt having had any such conversation. Q. hid you conversation as to the debates in this house, or as to who would vote on one bid , : the utlter?—A. I beet no recollection whatever or any conversation of that stature occurring, as it was a business in which I in no way concern , .. jnysElf., (ay Mr. JoGa Sums.) Q. Dud you any commusatc.st whatever nu the subjcs tof artily promotions with Mrs. Clark • —A. I never prolmsed any conversation of tinc, kind, nor do I remits:et any such having trans pired, excepting that at the period I have befo-e alluded to, when she resins...ord me to reconimend Lieutenant balmier to the Duke of York. I cer tainly never at any time made that the subject of conversation. Q. list' you any intirleotal oil') 31ri. Clarke ran that stel t iret ;—A. The period of so many yeara elarsed since t' .e inue allud ed to in .t fro tour que.titgb. it is ilopc).4ll4le for me to recollest, (fly Mr. ‘l' Ar. Q. 1M you r of ppir 0 Knowledge. know that Mrs: Clarke used Iles iutlaCl3{.l; in a.r ; v..ai what-