The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1805-03-07 00:00:00

7 , ;" some previous consideration or inquiry. He, there fore.' wis,o 1 his Lordship would not press it. Lord KING replied, he thought the subjed mat ter ot the motions was of a nature so clearly ueob jeftionable, as that he was surprised any opposition could be offered to it. He recoUeded what trans pired on his recently agreeing to postpone another motion. For the present he seemed inclined to press it. Lot d HAW KES BU RY, in explanation, beg ged the Noble Baron to recoiled that the Nlotion alluded to as postponed was so deferred as his owl aft. On the present occasion, feeling that he was sort prepared to give a decided opinion as to the me rits ,if the Motion, he would move the House to • adjourn. The LORD CHANCELLOR said a few words fns support of what had fallen front his Noble Friend. The question of adjournment was then put. Lord GRENV ELLE rose, and defend-d the ob servations of his Noble Friend (Lord King). He considered the information required by the Motion as unobjeftionable, and necessary to be laid before the House ; with a reference to the extraordinary powers vested b Government by the suspension of the Habeas Corpus Aft in Ireland, there could exist no doubt, that what had appeared, on an inquiry sn constituted as.that specified in the Motion, was fit to he laid before that House. He thought it hard, when that part of the United Kingdom was de prived of the benefit of the Habeas Corpus Ad, all relevant information, as hitherto called for, should he withheld. Were these denials persisted in, it would look as if they were inclined to abandon all constitutional controul on the exercise of inch ex traordinary powers as were now vested in Ministers. They refused even to consider the state of the jails in that part of the United Kingdon—a consideration they were the more bound to do, as conneded with an Ad recently passed by themselves. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed, no man could possibly lament the necessity of suspending the Habeas Corpus act more than be did, nor cou!cl be more willing than himself to have evcre degree of proper information afforded. He, therctOre, wished it to be understood, that, in supporting the nunicio for an adjournment that night, he -by no means wished to oppose the pro,ludion of any ioformation wit itever that ought to be given ; hut, that - he only sought for an opportunity of intoim i.ig himself whether the information ri quired in the present instance was such as ouebt to he given.— Idis Lordship then reteriel to the it ording . ,,t the rrintkm, iiasticillarly those words, " who sat i t Ili! purpose," frnm which, he could not coll.& for u4it purpose it was the sitting in qisest ivn was h.ll. peodusition required might involve the disch,siire of circumstances, which, for A time at least, it may be highly necessary to keep secret, as mformation respecting traitorous conspiracies, ke. : the-delay tiii to-morrow could at any rate make no difference, it would only give His Majesty's Ministers an oppoi - 'unity of ascertaining, whether the depositions in question were or not of a import fit to be laid before Parliament : they wished only for an opportunity of knowing what hue ot enadud was proper to be pur sued on the occosion. _ . . The k.arl of Du t ay expressed his opini in. that the positions advaeced by the Noble and Learned Iced, and his Noble Friend opposite to him, wore as extraordinary positions as he had ever heard ad oanced istkat Hupse. It was tlif. ditty of Minists-„ particularly of the Secretary ut State for the Home Department, to be so intortned with respt& to sub jells like that in question, as to be able t' declare, at the moment, whether the Motion was Obeiana ble or not. It was extraordinary to see a Secretary of Stew not informed upon such an occasion. Lord HAWKESiIIiIIY, in reply to the ani madversions of the Noble Earl, insiacd that the House was placed in a very extraurdimmrsittiatiun, by the condua of the Noble heron, in the present instance. Though not called for by their Lord ships' orders, yet, in common courtesy to the .House, a motion, which obviously called for consideration or enquiry, should not be passed, unless. previous notice of it had been given. Such a .motion as the present, he contended, required time to consi der whether, under all the circumsuences of the case, it should be agreed to or not. Time should be afforded for consulting with those whom it may be the duty of Ministers on such subjeds to recur to for information and advice. In proposing to ad journ, he meant not, in his preset view. of die subject, to oppose the motion : it was, in fad, urg ing a request that it might bit put off, so as to af ford even a short interval for consideration.. Such a course, he thought. should he :utopia, with all questionahie propositions, which wore bsought for ward and urged without previous notice. He meant not to offer the least opinion s& to the motion of the Noble Lord ; but he thought .that, inde pendent of the merits cf a question, the pressing of a motion without notice, as in the present ease, was sufficient ground for urging an adjournment. The question was then put—Lord.Hawbosbury's maim agreed to ; and en Adjournment till tomor row accordingly wok place. HoUSE OF COMMONS. 4 The Cie& of the Crown attended, and erased the name of J B Mainwaring from the return for the County of Middlesex, mad iuseriud in its place that of 9ir Francis blawdew. Sir J ANDERSON moved, that the Freeholders of die County of Middlesex should have the liberty of appealing within fourteen days against the Election of Sir F. Butdett, if they thought fit —0,4..4, Mr. lorryer's Lottery Bill was read a first, aud ordered to be read a emu od time. Sir J. ANDERSON obtained leave to ►ring in a bill to amend the former laws (or regulating the maim of bread, and profits of the bakers. Sir 3. NEWPORT ga►e notice that he would call the amen. lion of the Diane, on Wednesday next, au the state of the Pr of in Irelsod. Sir C. PRICE presented a Petition from several Merchants in London. r westing a Repeal of the Si* per Cont. Dine paid by the lira it Retailers on Crook Imported into Ireland.— Ordered to be laid on the Table. The SECKXTART at WAR mmented, accurrlottio order, sundry Army Accounts.--Ordered to lie on the Tabli. The House then resolved itself into a Committee of Supply. Mr. FOSTER proposed several sums of fr Irious miscellaneous services and cha ions in Ireland, which were agreed to. the sum of 7,05GL foe defraying advettisemenu and proclamations iveettv. •ENALD and Sir .1. NEWPORT item of expence, as affording a spe w Certain agents of Government, , and operating as a beaus to certain newspaper writers and editors in faiour of Government. Mr. FOSTER defended the appropriation of the tummy, and stated it to be the usual sum which had been annually voted year after year. Six thousand pounds were voted to vards defray ing the espence of building a Royal College of Sur gery at Duolin. On the Motion for granting the sum of 25,0011. for the purpose of carrying on Criminal Prosecu tions; Mr. FITZGERALD objeCled to such antici pation of expellee. The Prosecutions alluded to took their rise in the year 178&, when Ireland be c.une disordeied, and the several counties inadequate to the expellee of carryin on Criminal Prosecutions within them. "the sum of t 2,0001. was then granted. In 1797, it was extended to 17,0001. In 1798, when she Rebellion broke out, it increased to `20,0001.; and in 1800 a grant was obtained for 2,5,0001. which had ever since continued, and six Crown Solicitors had been appointed for carrying on such Prosecu. tions. He thought the whole was a total misappli• cation of the public money, and that each county should be bound, as forme' ly, to pay the expences of their own Prosecutions. Mr. FOSTER argued in favour of the grant, and 'hewed the hardship that would devolve on particu lar counties, where insurre&ions or public crimes might prevail, if the expences were not defrayed at the public charge. Mr. FITZGERALD renewed his former objec tions; but said, he had no objettion to the Motion, provided it were confined to prosecutions for state offences. He therefore moved that, after the word " prosecutions," be added the words, " in cases of high treason, or for treasonable prattices." Mr. Oitassav and Mr. FOSTLa obje&ed to the Motion, which was defended by Mr. FITZOLRALD and - Sir Jon N NICW/011T. - . . The Gallery was ordered to be cleared, bet no division took place. 'The Amendment being put and negatived, the original Motion was put and agreed to. Mr. WHITBRF.AD rose for the purpose of re marking that in the account presented, of the num ber of men raised for the Supplementary Militia, the gross numbers only had been stated, and no dis till:lion made between those raised for Ireland and frr Scotland; nor between those raised simply for the Supplementary Militia, and for general purposes. Mr. PUT stated th.: adual number up to the Ist of March, to be, for Eny,land 2381 ; for Ireland ;eon ; for Scotland 4.ict ; making to tal of 4049. Lord HENRY PEI' moved, that there be laid before thi.House copies of the depositions of the State Prisoners in Kilmainham Gaol, taken upon oath on the 16th and 17th at July last, before three Judges. Mr. prrr having expressed swish that the Noble Lord would give a regular previous notice of such a Motion; Lord 11. PETTY withdrew the same, and pre notice that be should bring it forward on Friday next. Sir JOHN NEWPORT gave notice that he should move to-morrow, that there be laid before the I louse the parnculArs of the expenditure for law expences in Irelald, trom the Unioa up to the Stli of January last. GENERAL DEFENCE ACT. Mr. SHEitiii,iirrrte, aticiTspoie to the follow. ing *flea :—" I rise. Sir, pursuant to notise p for thepuryose of moving for leave to bring inn Bill so repeal an Aa which passed last Session., for establishing a permanent force for the better dasnice of the MAIM,' but WOICkI LAS beea stated iss a more familiar phraseology to he " Mr. Pica's Pa rish Llefence Bill." When I first gave notice of my intention to make such a \ lotion, some Gentlemen • on the other side of the House seemed to receive it with a degree of :surprise, if not also of disapproba tion. I own, Sir, I telt myself at some loss how to account for the causes of tins conduit of theirs. Could they poionaly suppose that.my intention pro ceeded only from pique, that the late debate on the motion of a Right Honourable friend of mine (Mr. Windham) slid not go on that night ? or that we on this , side were so weakly supported on that occasion, that we wished to adjourn the sobjea of debate to some more 'avowable occasion ? or was it supposed that our coralua proceeded from any disrespea to wards the Right ilomoratree Gentleman now at the head of His Majesty's Administration, or from any native ba hfuluess in him to meet us again on a subjea which might be termed the darling child of his administration ? Though they might in this in stanocimpute .to us incivility in renewing the dis cussion. yet with us it is a paramount consideration to consult only duty, without too delicate a regard to what may be the feelings of the Right Honour. able Gentleman ; or Wits the surprise discovered at the noticed gave..owing to the persuasion waich was felt, that the subjea of my Right Honourible Friend's Motion had been so ably handled by him, that little snore could be adde-1 upon this more re strieted and specific Motion of mine? Be this as it may, no one, Sir. is more ready to grant, than I am, that. in that brilliant speech, my Right Hon. Friend amply proved this at (which my present Motion has for its object to repeal) remained a disgrace to your Statute Book. Study, then,:it can afford no just ground of surprise that some individual has risen to move the repeat of that Act. Or, Sir, am I in particular to be found fault with for the part I take upon the present occasion, as if, by my bring ing.this proposition befo re the House. it • can be fair ly stated that the tendency at least, if not the design, of the present Motion, is to damp the spirit of the country, to inspire the hopes of the enemy from the idea of our inadequate measures of precaution, or tothrow•st slur upon those who have been naively engaged in colleting our means of defence? Sir, I need onlymost sincerely assure you and the House, that if I really considered this to be the tendency of my Motion, I should be one of the last men who would willingly bring forward any thing pf the kind. I trust, therefore, that I shall stand fairly acquitted of any such sinister motives, and that I shall have due credit given me for the uprightness of my intentions,however much I may fail in im • pressing conviction upon the Right Honourable Gentleman and his friends opposite to me. Upon occasion of the preceding debate 'already referred to, it could not fail to escape oEs:Tva , tion that the Right Honourable Gent;eman main tained throughout a dignified silence, and that the answer which my Right Honourable Fri.-id re ceived proceeded from another quarter ( Mr. Can ning). My Friend has, I know, sometimes been thought unreasonable in his expeaations ; but sure I am, if he could remaiu satisfied with the answer he then received, he must be pronounced the most easil y contented man in the whole world I But I believe that there is no one out of the House who does not consider that answer to be wholly unsatiffeaory ; and I am really persuaded that ie is so regatded by none, more than the Right Hon. Gent. himself, who delivered it. At lead so I infer from the agitation he discovered, and his being obliged to • raise his voice in proportion as he dropped his argument. Surely no one appeared more than he then did to feel the disadvantage of his situation.' It might be fitly soiled a catamaran speech, causing a great noise, but producing little mischief; rattle mischief, I mean, to the cause he attacked ; but what it may have occasioned to his own side of the House, I will not pretend to say. Sir, in mt farther attempting' to argue this 'Aiwa, I shall chiefly consider it as zifeaing the country in a military point of view. Upon occasion of the former debate, it fell within the design of my Right Non. Friend to take a large scope, and, therefore, it may be thought that, amidst the variety of opinions delivered by hitt; on that occasion, there were some points on which we materially differed.— But, notwithstanding any thing of this sort, still on the satire which more immediately calls for the consideration of the House this evening, we are firmly united. L readily grant, indeed, that there are some points which arose out of the speech of my Right Hon. Friend, upon which we differ, and I hold myself at full liberty to retain the opinions I have formed upon them. For my own part, I con. dially approve of the Volunteer Force which has been raised, and I scruple not to *Tress my convic tion that it has made a due impression on the minds of Bonaparte and his minister Talleyrand ; and that when they found this banking commercial nation, this nation of shopkeepers as they term us, not con tented whh calling upon the Government to defend them; but that the great bulk of the people have turned out themselves, and buckled on their armour in defence of every thing they hold dear, their threatening enemies have paused, nor dared to put their threats of invasion into execution. Whenever a nation has shewn that spirit in a time of danger which ours has discovered, none can calculate the beneficial effects which hate resulted from it.— Another thing in which I differ front my Right Hon. Friend is, that I do not wish any material reduaion of our Militia. For this I entertain a great regard, as the constitutional foree'of the country. Neither am I an °eerily to a force of a varied description ; for I am of opinion that great Advantages arise from it, and much pi-fer this mode to that of en trusting the whole defence of the country to a regular army. ilidory bear, me out in assert ing, that en country ever long maintained its liberties, that entrusted its wole defence to a standing army. But, passing 'Lei/ shades of dif ference, nn points which do not ittimedfetely apply to the sabjea under consideration, and flatly ids claimial the impetation of attempting to damp the spirit of the country, by proposing a repeal of the aa in question ; I cannot avoid, at I pass along, to take notice of some previous cirettnetar.ces to the in trodu .lion of this aa. The House muss perfealy well recellea the pledge which the Right Hon. Gen. tleman was inie.e habit of giving, when, from time to time, he brought -forseerd his attacks upon his immediate predecessors in office, charging them with imbecility end insufficiency. What - did the R;ght Honourable Gendeman, in feet. say upon taese occasions, but this, , Let me resume the reins of Government, and I will infuse vigour into every department—l will place men of the highest talent in every prominent situation—/ will form an admi nistration, in which the country may place the fullest confidence—/ will bring forwerd energetic plans, both of defence and offence.' Such were his vein glorious boastings. And now the question is, whether he and his colleagues in office have not imposed on the House and the country by those charges which they were accustomed to bring against their predecessors ? It is now insinuated that thii motion will damp the - spirit of the coun try. inasmuch as it is like telling them that when this great man came again into office, his measures have completely failed in every part, and that this Army of Defence Bill in particular, instead of its having succeeded in raising men. has, in truth, de generated' into a Tax Bill. I grant that, if the question had been, as to tEe regular army, such might have been the effe,l of a discussion of this nature; but I deny that it can dispirit the country, to be informed, that the Right lion. Gentleman's vainglorious bo.ictings have proved abortive. A delusion in the present case, even if it were to be at tempted, is implitaicable; all art and chicenery mint vanish; the whole people of England are behind the scene; the whole perish officers of England have been employed to pull the strings of this puppet thew, and therefore it is impossible to deceive as to the efeas produeed. But. Sir, the questions which I mean more immediately to consider are these : First, Has the measure proposed by this Defence Bill failed or not ? Secondly, If it has failed, is it likely to do good to the country by any future bee nefit ? which feeds to the concluding enquiry, Tie ther it ought to be repealed er peristed iii ? e ' first enquiry then is, wlealeer this mraitire has failed er not ? The Rt. Hon. Geittieniais opposite, had beta in the habit of lookieg with such a jealous eye on the measures of his predecessors, as if he meant a triumph to himself, by eepbsing any instances of their wakness. The questihn now then Is, whether the very measures of the Mitt Honourable Gentle man are not thernselvie juitly ettiigeable with im becility ? When a vein-glorious haler comes 'mid says to you.** Turn this min out, in let me come, and see what I will do," is it fit that we sliMild bear with such boastings? Is it not fdir that we should' put him to the test of stria examination, how fart. he has fulfilled his promise, and reckoned his pledge ? If an' Army Contractor were to colie under a soleinn stipulation to furnish two thee sand capital hones, and were to produce '2OOO, oxen in their stead, in such a case the immediate question would not be, whether these oxen were useful or 'not, but whethei the contraaor had not broken his promise ? I wish, Sir, on this occa sion, to call the attention of the House to the gene ral return of our military force. It has been insi nuated, that though this measure has failed, yet it is not of equal consequence as it would have been dur ing the former administration, inasmuch as our mi litary system is now to much improved bath fur pure -~-~~aT- ... poses of feoneirnc force ti s sts d r •f aali on sn :e b • neocwa A u s t o : n rs e hwtgi G ls,e;ec:i:cialnr,tas:6 l ,itene,unt,irrnstt,edto,e2:l,ll,:tiyi.; oura lso na argu ed val been. But I deny, Sir, that we have ei the r t "- men added to our mi li tary force , or all y efred rn : 4 l addition to our navy. Still, iiii ii ii o sstr we ittch v io e a r in that there is something so strong, so vi energetic in. the constitution of our present nistration, that do enquiry is now becotr.e nec— s.iry, since we ought to place the grealsit dente in an Administration So formed ns th e b sc u a t t i salT:iett4inythifaitt were so , worse for the Country." Mr. Sheridan then ran ove r the minute statement, from papers bef ore t h e r ere of the comparative numbers of the at my of the Militia. Cavalry, and foreign Corps, for th e last years, and 'hewed that thi m suit amounted, iq the last year, to an increase in the foreign Corps, i 7,000 men, and in the. Catralry, of 4,000; bt' that there was a diminution of $53 m en British Infantry. But," continued Mr. Sheriiint how these black corps in the %Vest Indies. r.,. fives in the Island of Ceylon, could be said ro s: • any additional dispOseable force at home, is , , truly paradoxical. The increased force at naturally rises out of the increased danger to that settlement is exposed, just as it you en, your empire in India, you must necessarily tot ! your force there also. But what l contend is, th at there is no increase of force at home, whilst it sni p the professed purpose of the Bight I G er m,. man's Bill to increase the disposeable li.fantry of Britain. But even allowing that there is some in. crease, I ask, to whom is it to be ascribed, hie: to the former Minister, so frequently held up by the Bight Honourable Gentleman and ha friends as that weak, insufficient, milk and Iva ter sort of being ? and I ask also, whether enna of us have not been right in thinking it would be worse for the country far the late Administration to be turned out, and.others brought in, merely to have more promises broken anstexpedations uutulfine,. ' I say then, Sir, that the whole of the increase that has arisen in the Army, is imputable, not to the Riglit Hon. Gent: but to the Noble Lord (Sidnoeutli who is now at the head of His Majesty's Councils ( 0 lough), whether efficiently so or not I not peen to know. If then, the Right Hon. Gentleman enabled. as the public hive Inca taught to erg to do any thing offensive, or to carry on any gri exploit, depend upon it, it is Lord Sideneuth w. will have all the merit of it ! [a geisevil 15a14,?4.) , say, Sir, it is 'morally impossible that the Bitt io question could have had any such effeet on the state of the Army, for in Loa it has done nothing at all. The returns under the Bill for five months for the whole of Englatul and Wide;, amount to 1`295 ; dedudling (root this number those deserted and discharged, leaves the number Ito, so that we find the number of .men raised through out all England. and that with all the local 1001 ledge, of parish officers. tit.? sympat'ietic teel.r.gi patriotic individuals, and setting at work 410041 men, to produce 1,0011, leaves fin; quoin of 4; ma to each county, raised by this Luc sus Bill. In km land, if we exclude those discharged, not 33u mm have been raised. In Ireland, indeed, we find rhs number amounting to 1,084 which certainly tedeli great credit on the exertions of those coricerted ; but of the whole of this number, we do not find cos single man who has volunteered for general service. Io short, Sir, from all the details which have come kinfore as, we derive abundant proof. that the mode of recruiting by parish officers is infinitely wane than by re:nmental officers. The objesi of the for mer n ttura - liy was, to rid their remedies) parishes of bad men, and this effect was more particuiarly visible in the large mar.ufaCturing counties. Ac. cordingly we find. that, in Lancashire, no fewer than one-third of the men have since deserted. gal the populous county of Kent, you have ptoduced elserre mcn, if whom lace sines deseeteil! and what must seem stilt more extraordinary, even is the Cimrylse !'errs where the Right Hon. Gentlemen's influence isno unbounded, where his example and exertions have been so unrivalled, and where, as General, he has been adored (enieersetfarigli), have produced—erne sines moil! I dare say, Sir, is the most extraordinary ; r ecruit that even ima Lion can conceive ! A sow may litter to the of eight or nine sucklings—here we 'have oispring. et ilk Leo at ! I recolle't, Sir, that certain engagement, the commanding officer mach ed for Lord Donegal's squadron, A puny individual started forth and answered, Here lam !' So,wF.o it is enquired. where are the Volunteers of tea Cinque Ports, under Mr. Pitt's Bill ? this redoubtel remit may spring forth, and say, [tete I am,' (the lhosse con..seised with laughter.) But, to be ie• rims, I ten freely say, Sir, that I give Nil (relit c' every gentleman that we have but one heart erl mind in the objea of our pursuit, to put the coimri in the most assuming aspedt, either for etfmce defence; but. I really wish to dente/ the beggar who at the same time assumes the part of a bull, who as good as says. It you do not put tech pounds in a certain place. you shall be compelled to do as I would have you.' But these threats, which this Bill holds nut, it is known, are vain. The Privy Council are bound to take measures t, the appropriation Of the men to be raised en' this adt, but they never have ; nor, acing u it. can it be wondered at if the pati•Jo are relaxed. 1 confess, Sir, I should wish . to be imposed on the Privy Council, if 1:-. do not ad up to the powers entrusted to them:- But it has been said, We have not yet gran fn. Bill a fair trial, let it therefore • proesed ill the ter course of its operation ? but, Sir, what shoeid vs naturally think, supposing A projeaor were to 55P All your plans of light waggons and machines h conveying troops 'are nugatory7.destroy else chines-1 will find others—get twenty men, 1 !"• will convey them to Windsor and back spin hours.' Yoa then enquire at the expitinern of six hours, • Are these men come back I'—' they are - only it Kensington — they never got r thee.' What,' I ask ► should we say of such s hand as this or if .a man were to put into hand a bad gen, and I attempt to fire it, and' does Take ime -la not ev tenfitt o in ni hangst i hepan, fiandret_hebamvac p maker'" is, and it will do its business; but if I continued in g it for . *ix months, and still It refused Perform its office, ,silould J not be wart: to pronounce the, very principle of its cons' titan to be bad ? I say then, that the or riot. an trews., 1. 7 Sr C. ?RICE, vs in London. r poem paid by the lirt a Ref Ot4trett tk. be law' ea The St.CKTAR sundry Army Accoul The House the of Supply. Mr. I money for variou ritable institution Amongst others, the expences of in 7 . 4 e Dal** 44 Mr. FTIZGE • • i tsjs d to this ie • 41 • ti,.. . ewe ~_. 4.LA e a 3nn i r t t fit e 6 e ee on j t i ,It t o il e 6 1 4 : d y. 1 I.7hrvi t a t iv O eb er a tnvede a rl se :t.a,thncemou h eiw t : G e h . e 4etr.te a nsh ea n ieter n tr c ht tlenta i se a i n t nrn r eji t l cpriat el vessr d er. a ,i ! . ' .. nr any tiol tuts apt rot ga t de:ti the cart ! so r vi e glorous, So Ivt mai deft sas tion is chan ge d ; to mumu it s nfort the 1-1, u se , el ! it my of th bt u ., Inc Pas fur the sue , ant !. , reign Carps, of bee of 4,0n0 ; but, bat f $53 men o f the I Mr. Sheriian, beg 'at Indies, v- n . CSC Id IL! said :d J . : • pet homy, is , . Nr force at C me danger to t. „, : the s it yott cite ' les ecessarily est a' lo t contend is, t!; - ...; r ne, whilst it Wai so ht I lon. Gen,,,_ his able Ii fantry of ZSIJ Es there is some in- be ascribed, but do uently held up by Litman and hs the , milk and so. TM t, whether snrrx al fly; it would le coi Uministratien to gr, n e merely to have i; Ciotti uutuifillet• t eiy do ht increase that , not to the Right tai ..02.11 (81dICIOU11) r i sty's Councils (4 , f : I du not pretend ° i. Gentleman is tic aught to expc ' be 7 on any grr ~ to 1 Sidmouth who 5, wept' Inagh.) 1 to that the BM io Pr ch etre& on the r,i Ei Mt done nothing cc Bill f w five to id %Vales, amount th I number those ni he number 107% 111 it i ai , ..id through- Pr II the lecal know- di it'ititic teelsr.gs (.f to at work 40,4041 rr qumha of 41ma I 1 is 13111. In ..;:x. wi red, not 33u roes br diced, we find rhe op h certainly tethat to sti those concerted; di re do not find we w general service. qt which have come " ha of, that the mode is infinitely 110 SW TIV objet of the tor- tit .espeetire parishes th more particularly th g counties. At- •in e e It te r ' h ;n el p ; l : tan! bry 14,1 the ; tr e th Yl' e iinS im iru Ott b 7, have but c:r th Sir, that ;n s th officer enva• Cr my indiedtul 0; rn !' Soosiles at meets of to tl i be art :YL'33 l ie ona c t u i tt i i rt( ri :t o t hs ,e li y h' i p el i f i ltr A el , re: t te p e i:i i re stajb e gg I r, h g e't t t n l 7 1_ : t t hck tw inr w l IQ4c l l l 3 r raiae In Id d to iiiir r tht so ihon6l e measures hio • u 4:::b to e ssp e ye t red bat tin I mac hi s e s fa n o troy the se rns. fits ity men, lte- i ha :k b itindli 01 of lack ?I° r got far S, o le efiho vt into A of rpamievu: iuset tie continual 1' ru Is refused ris be wariaos• i n f its consul* se, sat the or' •