The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-06-11 00:00:00

THE BRIT 'R like all °there, whatever they might pretend, an enemy to civil and religious liberty ; but in private life, he knew, avd would answer for the fact, that his Royal Highness was in all respects a manly, open, honourable character ; a most kinteand affectionate husband; further, that he wart neither a spendthrift nor 3 gambler ; but from the liberality of his nature had been led into difficulties, which had compelled hint to reduce his establishment and live abroad, be , cense the House of Commons. in the exercise of its discretion, bad withheld the assistance which would have prevented the necessity, Lastly, as to the cause of his unpopularity, which a Right lion. Gentleman had ascribed principally to his marriage, the real ground had been stated by another Hon. Member.. viz. his reel in the service of those who, by their " No Popery" cry, had turned out their opponents. But the crime brought its own punishment, in the resentment of the persons he had offended, whilst he was deserted by his own party, and especially that individual who had made a tool of hint, as he had since made of another, and whirr, for which last act,daierved impteehment as much as any Minister who had yet been brought to the scaffold. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was extremely sorry that any condnet he might hare pursued on this re any other question should hare subjected him to a charge of unteir or uncan_ did proceeding. The Noble Load had his thanks and gratitude for the flattering manner in which he had been pleased to express himself; his thanks and his gratitude were, however, accompanied with pain at some of the observations which fell from the Noble Lord. (Hear, hear.) After the many discussions which had taken place he did not think he should still be under the necessity of con sidering whether the grounds of the proposed grant were right or wrong—the question stenply was, whether it was expedient or not to give his Royal Highness the means' of*educating his son ; if that son were not born the grant most certainly would uot have been advised by tilt Majesty's Minister', who did feel that as Par liardent had already given his Royal Brother* an additional an nuity of 6.0001. without reference to their having children or not, they thought that. ander these circumstances. his Royal Highness was not called on to give his son his education in this country, un less adequate means were afforded him for that purpose. They also felt that his Royal Highness would, in all probability, come to England to superintend his son's education, and that if he so returned, it would he unjust to leave hien in less favourable air. cun.stances that his other brothers. (Hear, hear.) The Right Hen. Gentleman went on to say. that from the present state of the Dike of Canthe land, granting hint an increased anuaitv would not be inconsistent sith the former refusal. (Hear.) Define he sat down he wished to explain an error into which he had fallen on a }receding evening ; on that occasion , in newer to an observation which fell from the Hon. elember for .Montrose (Mr. Hume), in reference to the Duke of Sussex, he (the Chancellor of the Ex chequer) stated that his Royal Highness's wife enjoyed, from the bounty of his Majesty, four or five thousand pounds a year; he owed it in justice to her Royal Highness now to state, that the allowance which that lady received front the Crown did not exceed 2.5001. a fear, which, after certain reduction. might be fixed at 2.00111., and that the ether two thousand were paid to her by the Duke of Sus. sex. (Hear, hear.) Mr. TIERNEY was anxious to state his reasons for opposing the proposed gram. (Hear. hear.) In doing so he would throw out of his mind all that had formerly passed with reference to the Duke of Cumberland. If he liked his Royal Highness ever so much, he would still oppose it, as being in prihciple mischievous. and in precedent not warranted. (tim e liest, hear.) Now, with reference to the messege, it was to this effect. that since the mar riage of his Koval Highness, no provision having been made for him, it was expedient to confer on him a grant for the education of his son. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that the terms of the message acre to the effect, that certain circumatanees had occurred since the lag settlement, which made it expedieut to give increased annuities. Mr. TIERNEY resumed—Well, what had occurred but the birth of the two children, fur whom it WA said that additional means of support were necessary ? It was not fair to confound the two cases, tot in one instance the melancholy death of the father had occurred, by which oe means were left his widow to educate her child. That child was now six years old, and her education up to the present moment was owing to the liberality of her uncle t Hear, hear), who was still willing to support the burden. (Hear, hear.) Now, to wine to the other child, and his claims on Perlis. ment, if the Bowie acceded to the grant, they must at once admit that a child removed four degrees from the throne, was entitled to a Parliamentary grant of no less than 6,111111. a year for his education. Hear, hear.) Ile was convinced that it the Chancellor of the Exchequer stated firmly and openly, that the grant was intended solely for the child and not for the Prince, that considerable opposition would be removed by it. The Right Honourable Gentleman went on to say, thtit the arguments advanced by the Noble Lord (the Marquis of Tavistock) near him, ought to have satisfied any nian as to the impropriety of the grant, end he re. petted that the Chancellor of the Exchequer did not avail himself of the Noble Lord's suggestion. There were, he conceived, a variety of objections to the Bill, and here It was worthy of remark, that no other grant was couched in the same tenus as the present. In the case of all others, the message from which they originated required that a certain sum be placed at the disposal of his elajesty for certain purposes which were set forth in the mess e. All they could find in that Bill was, that it WU expedient to provide ter the Duke of Cumberland's son. No such thing was ever said to be expedient before, (Hear, hear.) No apelication was made for a grant for the Dukes of Sussex and Cambrii'ge until one was 28 and the other 23 years of age; and in the case of the Dukes of Kent ainl Cumberland, they had attained the respective ages of 32 and 28 years. (Hear, hear-) Why , then was it " expedient" to grant this young child so extrava gant an annuity, always bearing in mind that the Duke was out of the question. (Hear, lieu.) Then, said the Right Hon. Gentle man, I say that this child does not stand in need of WOOL a-year, (Hear, hear.) It should be staled that the father had no means of educaeng ins son before any %rant was demanded. For his own part, he had no particular wish that the child's education should take pace in England, though at first be was certainly caught by (Hear, hear.) He saw no reason 'why a young Prince might not be very well educated in Germany. His late Majesty, for in stance, so far from thinking that place an improper one fur the education of children, sent all the young princes there. (Hear, hear, and a laugh.) There was, therefore no mischief to be ap. prehentied on that score. lie could well conceive that a Prince, after a certain age might become inoculated with the principles of the Holy Aielance ; (a laugh.) but he thought that the contagion was not likely to affect a child undet Ii y . ears of age. The Right lion. Gent. else objected to the terms of the Bill ; all forniercases the money was placed in the hands of his Majesty, who was ena. bled to order the issue of a certain sum, according to his pleasure. In the present instance his Majesty h ad no discretion ; the grant was conveyed by letters patent. (Hear.) In former grants there was a power in his Majesty to issue according to his will and plea. sure; now he must do so as a matter of necessity. He had no con. iroul over the money, but on receiving an acquittance from the ' Duke of Cumberland or his agent, the money must be paid. Be sides, suppose the Duke of Cumberland does not come, and that'! it were thought necessary that the child should. he (Mr. Tierney) had too good an opinion of his Majesty to suppose that, by with- holding the grant, he would be a party to keeping the child from his relation. Now the only secunty was, that if the education did not take place here it should be withheld. Such, he contended, was not a constitutional reason. (Hear, bear, bear.) IVIly then use that provision ; it was merely to carry the Bill in the same manner as the Grant to the Duchess of Kent daughter had also been hitioduced. (Hear, hear.) When the increased allow. I once was given to the Princess Charlotte, it was to issue no:ending to the will and pleasure of his Majesty; the Grant wan made di. reedy to his Majesty, and was to continue during the lifetime of the late ledig and the then Prince Regent, in whom the entire eon- I trout of it was pieced. The present proceeding was mint dia. graceful. Let the fund be at the disposal of the Crown, and let his 31ajesty's Ministers be responsible for its application. As it then stood, he defied any honest man to lay his hand on his heart and say the money was solely for the education of the child. lie should give his most decided opposition to the measure, which in Iris opinion outraged all former precedents. (Hear.) Mr. Secretary CANNING next rose, and spoke nearly to the following effect :—Sir. before the House comes to a deviaion on :IT present question, I wish to make a few remarks on the topics trieth the Right lien. Gentleman has introduced in his speech. I steel discharge all consideration of the propriety of the grant, and confine myself speci fi c dly to the want of control which the Right lien. Gentleman conteeds his Majesty will have over the education i of, the young Prince; that is, over the disposal of the funds intended fur that purpose. Now, !'apprehend that, before I say any thing ! as to the control of his Majesty, it will be necessary to state that in the first instance his 3lajesty's Ministers will endeavour to ascer tain whether or not it would meet the pleasure of the Duke of Cum_ berland to reside in this country ; in the event of his doing so, and what his determination now is, neither try Right lion. Friend near me (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) nor I have any means of as certaining; but suppose he did determine, then I say it reedit be. our duty to immediately give the money to the Duke of Cumber land, for there exists no disposition to come between the father and the son • but suppose he should choose to reside abroad,—and that 1 such is his iutenupn I have nowlno knowledge,—in that event it will be the bounden duty of his Majesty's Ministers, before the issue of a single shilling takes place, to secure such conditions as shall en. sure the intended application of the grant, namely, that the young Prince be educated in England. (Cries of hear, hear.) In neither case, therefore, does these dispositions, either on the one hand to tear the child front his father, or on the other hand to make it im. perative on him to reside in this country. (hirer, hear.) What causes may induce his Royal Highness either to close or continue his residence abroad I do not know, and it Is not for us to inquire; but it does appear to his Majesty's el heelers that it would be harsh to make the condition of the grant his Royal Highness's return to England, a hile on the other hand there is every temptation in the present proceeding to induce him to reside here, and also a security that if he do not so reside, the young Prince will, at all events, be educated in the manner approved of by Parliament. (Hear, hear.) The Right lion. Gentleman said, that when the subject was fi rst broached, he was taken with the expediency of having the young Prince educated lb Englund ; es was my Right lion. Friend (the Chancellor of the Exchequer), so was I, and so were we all. (Hear, hear.) The only difference is that after the most mature considers.don my Right lion. Noble }mail and I persevere in our opinions, whilst the Right Hun. Gentleman bait departed front his. (Cheers.) We certainly did think that a Prince who was in such near proximity eo the throne of these realms, and who May one day inherit it, ought naturally to be educated amongst Englishmen. (Hee; hear.) Now, as to the precedent which it is stated this grant will establish, I will not take on myself to say that unfortunate events may not place uther ceildran of the Royal Family in the same pretl.elment, but at present we have only to deal with the two beforeehe House, and Mb we might to do without reference to other peneble C 11.131. With referenee to the amount of the prop seed mane I do not be lieve teat fey man will ley thi et the 3dr:title:nal calls whit* Wale of. . . course be made on the Duke of Cumberland, in the event of his transferring his residence to this country, would be more than corn. peneated by the 6,00 i 1. voted to him, which 6,0001. will of course include the expenses of his son's education. (Hear, hear, hear.) . On the other band, if the Doke of Cumberland should retook; abroad, and as I have already said, I am not prepared to, announce any determination upon the subject either one way or other, I think it will be admitted that the auto we now propose to grant for the maintenance and education of this young Prince will not be more than sufficient to cover the expenses of a separate estebliihment in this century. I do nut mean to assert that the whole sum of six thousand pounds will be wanted on the lest year or the second, or that the grant may not in the early years of the minority. some what exceed the atnount actually required for the accomplishment of our object ; but 1 contend that in every short time, when this young Prince approaches the age of 14 Or 15, the sum we propose will not be more than sufficient for his education, with a due regard to the rank and dignity of a person placed so immediately in the Erie of succession to the throne; and I think that It would not be either respectful or decorous to place the guardians of the child under the necessity of applying to Parliament every six or twelve months in every future year, for those additional grants which his increasing age and enlarged expenditure might require. Ido nut. thetefore, 'see . that there is any thing in this grant which can be well called extravagant, or that it can be fairly attributed to us that we are 'peeking for it item an other purpose beyond that which has been already declared to the House. That declared purpose is on the one hand to enable the Duke of Cumberland, En the father ' of this young Prince, to return to this country, with the object of ' procuring his son an education suitable to his rank, without at the same time being embarrassed in the support'of his establishment; and on the other hand, if the Duke does not choose to return and I I . again say on that subject I have no information--to make a pro otsion for the separate education and maintenance of the child in England by a grant which, under all the circumstances of the came, will not exceed what may be required for that separate estab lishment. I do not know what it is in this proceeding that has been stigmatised as unfair ; undoubtedly, perhaps the course of another year might have enabled us to speak with more certainty; but if the object be the restoring the Duke of Cumberland to this country, I believe it must be taken as an experiment of years, not money. The Right . Honoittable Gentleman tale us there are few or no precedents for this meagre. I admit that to be true ; but it must be recollected that the younger branches of the Royal Family to which the Right Renewable Gentleman alludes, were living under the same roof with the* parents, and that there was not the same Immediate rational object in their cases*? looking to the succession to the throne. It will not, however, be supposed at present that the younger branches of the Royal Family are sup ported by the King ; anti it should always be borne in mind that when an adequate provision was made for them by Parliament, there was one to whom that boon was denied. I will not refer mole to the circumstances under which it was denied, because I de not wish to say any thing unkind ; but I say it should be borne in. mind that the refusal of that provision produced a state of things unnatural with respect to that one, in his relation to the others, and deprived him of the power of defraying either his own expenses or the expenses of his child. (Hear, hear.) ‘Vhen motives are im puted to Members in the execution of what they conceive to be a conscientious duty. I do not know what course is to be taken but to deny them. if there be any man who adopts a side upon this , question from any reason which he dares not avow, I have uo such necessity. My motives are conscientious, and I avow them. I say that I think the education of this child is an object of national %importance, and that I consider the amount to be as reasonable, and I 'the unsoner as unexceptionable, as they possibly could be under all ilk circumstances and difficulties of the case. (Cheers.) Mr. BROUGIIA3I.—Sir, I give entire credit to the assertion of the Right Honourable Secretary. that he is nut actuated by any sinister motives in what he has stated to the House ; and I give that credit not only from what I know of him, and what Indeed he has aright to expect from me, but I give it to him also from what he has said in the concluding sentence of his address, that he would grant this provision because it had not been conceded before. (Hear, hear.) That is the Right Honourable Seesotary's avowal— that too is the declaration of the Chancellor of the Rxcheguer—but that is not the avowed purpose of this Bill, and upon this attempt at deception I make my stand against it. It is one thing to say that the Doke of Cumberland has bean frustrated twice before—in the year 1816, and again in 1818—in his endeavours toobtain from Par liament this grant of 6,0001. a year, and that therefore you should give it to him now ; and it is another thing to come down to this House and say you must make a certain provision for the education and maintenance of that Royal Duke's child. Now I differ from the Right Honourable Gentleman an; the other side of the House, upon the constitutional law of the case; and I believe they will find. if they consult the Crown Lawyers, that tl.ey are of my opi nion ; that the Duke, by the wording of the Bill, obtains a vested right in the grant the moment it passes ; for I contend the words are not optional but imperative. I would only recall to the Right Honourable Gentleman's recollection a Bill in which he and I bad some fellow feeling_l mean the Catholic Bill—and I think he must remember that from the occurrence of the very same words I was obliged to put off the discussion, and adjourn the debate until I had made an alteration in the wnds " shall and may," which were objected to in It, nut as optional, but Imperative, and between the Friday and Monday, bring it up again with those alterations. I differ also from the Right Honourable Gentleman in point of fact on this case. He says that the Princes of the Blood Royal stood in no nerd of relief, because they were under the shelter of the Royal roof. Why, so they were at Gibraltar, so they wereetNova Selina, so they were at Canada—where one of them was st Go . vemor, and commanded a regiment. Surely it cannot be seriously said, that the Princes of the Blood. Royal are not as much emelt eipatod in this country from paternal control at twenty-eight•or two-and-thirty, as they are in any other country in the world. But there is another case, I think, even stranger. The Duke of Gloucester—net the son, but the nephew. of the King. standing precisely in the same situation to the late King as Prince George does to ours—and what was the grant to him P not a grant for his education or his maintenance, independent of hie father, but a grant of maintenance, not to take edict until alter the demise of the Duke, his father. (Hear.) I have objected to this grant upon economical grounds, as uncalled fax and unnecessary; but I object to it much more upon the constitutiooal grounds; and it is upon that more than the economical, that I implore the opposition of the House, because, by giving your consent to this proposed allowance, you naturalise a principle, that as often as our Sovereign may have a grandson or a nephew, or a grand nephew born in succession, whether near or remote it matters not, to the Crown, Parliament is immediately to be called upon to pension the father twice and thrice over, to provide for his increasing offspring. For, it becomes after thisprece dent, a matter of right to the claimant, and Parliament will be bound to concede that right. Upon that ground therefore I have persisted, and will persist, in taking the sense of the House on this bad and unconstitutional measure. lam extremely glad that the cha racter of the Duke of Sussex has been properly vindicated. That illustrious . person is the only one of the Royal Family who has never removed any additional allowance—any thing but the Par liameutary grant apportioned to him as a younger brother—no regi ment, no aunt for the payment of debts, and though placed by his unhappy marriage in peculiar circumstances, which marriage by the bye, I may say was according to the opinion of a man whose name I may mention without any breach of the forms of the House, LeCittlNt he is no longer a Member. I mean the pious, enlightened, and humane Mr. Wilberforce. I say, that in his opinion the law which dissolved that marriage, was one of the moat unconstitu tional and immoral ever passed by this House. That Illustrious Personage has paid out of the 10,000/ allotted him by Parliament, 6.000/. to this lady, leaving him 13,0001., and I know not how much to her issue, the fruits of their marriage. And yet with all ' this drain upon his income—and with at one time a very large amount of debts, he has never even dreamt of any proposition to Parliament, never entered into any compromise with his creditors, 1 but paid 20a in the pound honourably and fairly, so as to reduce the whole amount of a debt, at one time nearly 100.0001. to a sum scarcely worth mention. And all this he has done without any compromise with his creditors, and without the slightest degrade- , Lion of the Royal dignity. but solely from the sacrifices suggested 1 by his own honourable mind, and the arrangements of his house- I hold under the learned person who presides over it. I would say, therefore, with regard to him, that although Raley be best not to get into debt, the next best thing is to get out of all such obligations with promptitude and integrity. I have discharged my duty from the beginning to the end of this discussion according to my con scientious sense of what was right, and I will nor, detain the House no longer. I hope to God the Alembers will now redeem their charac ters, so as to enable them to look back with the sat ktaction of having supported the votes winch excited such an u.t.- amour feeling of approbation in 1813 and 1018, for I will add, ti.at while we have the satisfaction of uppealing to our own consciences, we been, I verily believe the opinion of the whole country. I believe also, that our endeavours against this unconstitutional grant, .111 be judged of kindly and candidly by the Illustrious person whose con certs form the subject matter of our debate, he will gire us credit for our motives. I know if he has one-half the msg. nanimity ascribed to him, which has been reported of hint, and which I firmly believe, I know he will give us all credit for the purity of our motives. I have opposed this grant on no personal grounds ; I opposed the former grants on no personalifrounds, and I believe and trust that in the true magnanimous spirit of his family lie will attribute our actions to their just motives, and give us credit for the purity of our intentions. I know that the Com mander-ln-Chief by • conduct above all praise, has shewn that he forgives--no, that is not the proper term— that he forgets, or only remembers to approve, the conduct of those who felt it their duty to prosecute the investigation of 1809. And the late Queen, the most injured and persecuted of women, allied to the family by blood and affinity, was, I can riser, one of the most forgivill in nature and disposition i and his present Majesty—l say this in an swer to all the malignant calumnies which have been so industri ously propagated—notwithstanding all that occurred in what I may call the rsonal conflict, in which 1 was professionally engaged, has gracious and magnanimou s ly, and the more so because it was unasked —v untarily, I repeat, conveyed to me the assurance that Gl e I all the rumours upon the subjtct were malicious or misinterpreted— that he retains not the slightest feeling of unkindness from any observations which I thought it my duty to use--and that all the insinuations, on the contrary, are uuerly false. %%le cannot, there. fore, by the vow by which we are about to come, have arty itpore hension that a member of this illustrious anchenagnanimous homily can feel that we have done any thing offensive to hi- feelings in the discharge of our public duty. The House then divided— For the Oird reading, 170 1 Against it, 121 1 Majority, 4V Upon our entering the gallery we found Mr. BROUGHAM proposing an amendment, with a view, we suppose, of having it entered upon the Journals; we could not, from the noise, catch ha purport, but it was negatived without a divisiou. The Honourable Gentleman then proposed as an amendment, that the sum a 5,0001. be greeted to his Slajest) fur the 14.:L»IteoanCe PARLL4MENeAR I' INTELLIGENCE. HOUSE OF LORDS. tatuat..JONl IL 60. The RhAttsa Ar ibe " 4in w tett Alec at .Lipmandirig h "reef Cl4ll:erh; re es 1, .4.Verrlate Oility 4 _ Branch Realm Ada the {de of Dolis Bill, the bleb I Arteries Racourarrnent Bin, the Aseesennata Bill, end the St.Cath crime s Docks Bill, mad t nate Bills. The Commitelebers eta, the LORD CHANCELLOR, the Extol ditAITI3II:7IT. and Viscount M ELY it. Lli• The Dilsop of CIiESTRft entered into some explanation ;els. bee me petition presented by him some time since from Preston, isaheAst t of latneaster, on the subject of the Catholic Claims; has the Rev. Prelate was notsinderitood below the bor. The ertsheat and Factor Bill aeon through. a'Commiuee, and the Sepett was seteltei iritheat amendment, and ordered to be taken &NO illleillielfiNl oy a rem akiej MIL IN NE RS. Lod SUFFIELD grammerl s petit* from the cotton spinners of the Sewn end nobly efehosp. In Amour of the Bill for limit. Omhe tine of Wier is die ewes vellie—Lti4 on lb* table. the mien of ***We lA* the Bill foe the time • •of Lakes is *GUM= Mb um refined ens Onineltsen . The beim. aad Lomes.llaettity Sill co dm. ac.motnittee. ai lite lepset m* COUP"' Oa as Nobs at impLIBRIELS totality Seen* Din s ai r es =el le The4deese ohm 1 reeding of the next. 4.•••••••••••••••• HOUSE OF COMMONS. Fugoex, Jung 10. I r C4rlBllltliiiioll. At %Mdune eels& ibe House eras summoned to the to bait lb, R.ysl Anon given by C.oamisuoo to The e!-ABEI Alithrate Qills. - - ER. en his return informed the House of the names the Bills so which the Faysl Aesent had been given.— Woe which see Lords' Report.) HANTS AND BERKS CANAL. file. C. DUNDAS enveed that • farther time be allowed to thet Committee* ado *dr livens the Han a and Barks Canal Bal. He Mottthe SIM Joss • emvenient dose. Mr. F. PA vas appealed to the Bill is toto. The landed reopened* loweßy Ahmed ors Linde to the eicesare. They we'r* • agelastit is the of Mb Ibileß, while its supporters wire caulked te) the If lb* or six.iforlonp of the intended lino Mr. CALCRAFT reatenstimeled the abandonment of the Bill till neat Session. He disapproved at the proposed extension of the Report, and would take the same the House on it. dlr. BRIGHT supported tbs Rill. After a few+ observations from Mr. JONES, Mr. Alderman WooD. Mr. Aidealma HIEOATE, Sir J. NEWPORT, and Mr. A. BARTNE., the Home divided, what there appeased— For he motion - - Against It . . • Majority . . —29 WEST INDIA STEAM YAVIGATION BILL The Weetindia,b'team Navigation Bill wen teed a third time, anti passed. IRISH MINING DTLL. The Irish Mining and...Joint-Stock Company Dill for the encou ngement of manufactures in that country, was read a third time, and panned. BRISTOL TOWN AND MAYOR'S DUES BILL. Mr. H. DAVIS presented a petition from the Bankers and Mer chants of Bristol, kr the introduction of a clause protecting their interests in the Bristol Town Dues BiU. Mr. H. DAVIS moral the third reading of the Bristol Town bum Bill. bIe•BROODEN moved the introduction of a clause to the effect that nothing in the Act should be construed to extend the sights of the Mayor and Corporation of Bristol. After a few wards from Mr. BILIGHT, Mr. LITTLETON, Mr. M•NSELL, and Mr. AI ASENALY, Si/ J. NEWPORT said the ietention of the Committee was, that the rights of all parties should be saved harmless. (Hear. bear) As the Bill stood at present it gave the Corporation a legal side, and took away from the people all power to prosecute in a Court of Law what they considered their just claims. Ile should, therefore, oppose the * Bill, unless the saying clause was in. troduced. Air. 11. DAVIS supported the amendment. Mr. W. WH !'MORE said if the saving clam were not in serted he also should oppose the Bill. After a few words from an lion. Member, whose name we could not ascertain, strangers were ordered to withdraw. We understand that no division took plate. and that the further consideration of die Bill was postponed to Monday next. THE DUKE OF CUMBERLAND'S ANNUITY BILL On the question that the Duke of Cumberland's Annuity Bill Le read a third time, The 11Iamui. of T.AVISTOCK said, that as that was the last opportunity which could offer itself, he would state shortly his ob jeciiors to the proposed grant. He opposed it as a bad precedent, and because he did not wish to see thellouse tricked into a vote. t Hear, henr, hear.) If it were not so, he called on the Chancellor nettle Eteheguer to say on his conscience, as an honest man, if he believed the whole of the grant would go to the education of the rsunk Prince. (Cries of " hear, hear.") If the Right Hon. l/entloman laid his hand on his heart and said that lie conscien tiously thought it would, then be (the Marquis of Tavistock) moat certainly would give credit to the assertion, and though be should still regard the grant as eetravagnuo. such was the high opinion he entertained of the integrity of the Right lion. Gentle. man, with whom he had not the honour even of a personal ac quaintnee, that he would be far from opposing the measure. (Cheers.) With such a feeling towards the Right lion. Gentleman, be was sorry that with his usual candor he did not cotne down in a straight forward manner, and openly ask for an additional grant of 4,00a1. a-year to the Duke of Cumberland. (Hear. hear.) If such manly course had been pursued, he for one would not oppose it. (Hese, hear.) He saw no reason for the great outcry which had been raised against his Royal Highness ; no direct charge had ever been brought against him ; at all events whatever grounds existed for the feeling which prevailed towards him, he had been punished enourh. The Noble Lord went nn to say, that he disliked extremely the trick which had been resorted to in asking money for one purpose, and applying it to another. (Cries of " Hear, hear.") In private lite he was sure the Right Hon. Gentleman was incapable of such undethend insidicnis a proceeding. (Cheers.) Another objection To the Bill was, that the giving so large a grant for the education of so young a Prince, established a bad and dangerous prudent. Wheels.) The Noble Lord said that it was now some time since he bad taken part in the debates of the House ; he was therefore most happy, and felt extreme pleasure in bearing testimony to the improved system which had lately been adopted, ands's° to the wise, praiseworthy, and conciliatory conduct of his Majesty's 111 i. Mater, (Cheers from all sides of the !louse) ; and particularly to that of the Right Hon. the Secretary for Foreign Affairs. (Hear, teas) He was therefore the more sorry that they should risk their merited popularity by lending themselves to a grant so disgraceful as the present. (Cheers.) " I don't know" (said the Noble Lord) " that I have any farther observations to make than to thank the House for the indulgence with which I have bceu honoured, and to express to the lion. Member fur ai'inchelsea (Mr. Brougham) my warmest thanks far his persevering opposition to the proposed grant.' (Cheers.) General PALSIER said, he had hitherto taken no part In the question, as he could not give a silent vire, and was unwilling to trouble the Roux with his opinion ; but further consideration and justice to the party whose honour and interests were at stake, de. termined hint to combat his reluctance to address it. Ile was note cal those who in the former instance had supparted the nint'crt fcx the saute increased allowance to the Duke of Cur:lotion tioi; was voted to his brothers under die same circumstances, and had always considered the rejection of that measure an act of injustice to his Royal Highness. and an insult to the honour and feelings of the Crown. It vas therefore solely upon that ground he must vote for the present sin, condemning it in all other' espect& He had before dezlared, and now'repeated his conviction, thas.the only real enemies of the Crown were its own Ministers; nor since ha bad been in Parliament, did he remember a single cittenion wherein its honour and interests were concerned, th-t all the d.c. credit brought upon it wax not solely to be impn;ed to them. They, and eta the people, were its Constitutional advisers, arid their neelect compelled others to the painful and invidious task of doing tut Jr duty lot them. Either they dared not tell the Cr^wn the tools or purposely brought it into collision with the people, to divert their attention from acts of deeper mi-chief, and thus throw a tub w the whale. How else was ther conduct to be explained. unless, such was the force of habit, they could not pursue a straight course wham nothing stood in their wny. As to the present Bill, had they „A y r ene we d it i n its % r aw .iiape, with the simple statement that los Royal Highness, after ten years' absence, was desirous of re turning to England with his family, in the only way that, eon s;gte.itly with hi. honour and interne, he could return--namely, by being placed upon the saute footing as the other branches of the Crown, the ertoe-o ground of objections 'o the Bill would not have existed ; instead of which. Ministers had not only ran their heeds moinst a tall , but actually built it for the purpose. In place of a grant of G,OOIL to the only party wishing it, they called upon Parliament for double the amount, fir reasons Mae iti .-Ore). or which, If-true, were revoking to ti:e sense end feelings of the people, and humiliating to all the proles bernotht forwent in the course of the debate, ex:opting that illustrious' 'female whose exemplary conduct had spoken for itself, aed gained her the esteem and admiration of the country. Bat the Individnal who, if not a /forty to the act, had been placed by Ministers in an invidious light, was that Personage whose splenchd income freni the country had littherto prevented slat: application to Parliament. which the Chan ,ellor of the Exchequ-r, the guardian of the public purse, and the 114.100 UT of the Crown, had now deemed to be necessary; and to whom he must bay that neon the fese M that application, disc:roll; attached somenheve, and whoever the cap fitted the party ought to sear it. Bus Ma chief object in isidressing the House was to de_ lend the Individual, whose personal character had been the role erouod"of opposition to that grant in the former instance, the real ..Meet of the penent Pill ; arid with reepeet to which, no Member the Howe had at that time fel: a stroegee prejudice against the party tba himself, for reseals eonnected with his political con tact ; bug. the same revive which had dictated his form e r vote, tolled on him now to declare his conviction that no man had been nem greatly calumniated than his Royal 'Highness. As to hit wen it unnatural. :l.as bor. anti 'deer:tot at Cost , with a nosno, foe his twee, Le alosuLi he a Tor) in his Flu' and I. ~~ and education of his Highness Prince George, during the term of his natural life. This alto was negatived without a division. After some conversation between the 41swcut.t.no of the Ex. CHEQUES and Mr. BROUGHAM, upon the subject of the words ~ w ill" and ** shall" in the Bill, the wor d s .. During his Ma. jesty's will and pleseure, and in such manner and forms as to his 3ledesty may seem Si," were introdticed es an stneedment after the word " that." The Bill then passed with a laud and em. Oldie ** No" from Mr. Brougham. BUCKINGHAM PALACE. Mr. BROUGHAM, hearing that a sum was *she provide e f tte hi Crown the sale of lends for rebuilding Buckingh a m Palace, b to know if the Chancellor of the Exchequer had say :Tenn to produce the account of the expenditure upon Carlton Palace. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHLQUER teplL.i, (M.: it the Honourable Gentleman give notice of a in/tien en the sulk°. he would try if the papers could be ptocured. Mr. BROUGHAM asked whether it was the intent:on of 'ee Right Hon. Gentleman to enter into say other exposition of his views on the subject of Buckingham Palace. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said he had, for the despatch of public business, Shortened the *details upon the question. on Bement of the lateneu of the hour when it was men. noned ; but he would be prepared, on the wood reading, to glee the fullest explanation. SUING OCT WRITS IN IRELAND. Sir 1 NEWPORT presented a petition from a greet many rweetable attorneys, on the subject of suing out writs, and the difliculty of executing pmeesses..—Ordered to be printed. MAGISTRATES OF SURREY. Mr. DENMAN gave notice of his intention to present a petition on Tuesday, relating to the conduct of the Surrey Magistrates, and to found some proceedings thereupon. TOWNLANDS' BOUNDARIES BILL (IRELAND.) Mr. GOULBURN moved the Order of the Day for the House going into 111 Committee oa the Townlands' Boundaries Stint. Mr. S. RICE moved that it be an instruction to the Committee on the Bill to receive a cheese for making the plamolappointe.l tor gaols and eeetet.housee, and no longer used for etat pa/pose, pare of the loeshjuristlictiona, whereto they are situated. 001 LBOURN opposed the caution. Sir J. NEWPORT supported it. And after a few word. from Mr. R. m•Nitor. the gallery was cleared fora division, and the motion for giving the above in. atruction to the Committee was agreed to. Strangers were for a considerable time exeleded from the gallery . ; a discussion in the meanwhile toot place, but there was no division. The Bill. with its several clauses and amendments, then passed through a Committee, and the Report was ordered to be received to-morrow. _ _ _ SMUGGLING PREVENTION BILL. The House resolved itself into a Committee of the whole House on the Smuggling Prevention Bill. Mr. BERRIES said this was one of a series cf Bilk proposed to be substituted for the numberless statutes at present existing for the prevention of smuggling. lie did not exaggerate when he stated that the number of Acts to prevent smuggling exceeded 500. It was now intentleA to compress the substance of these Acts into twelve new Acts, containing all the important provisions. The House must be aware that the formation of these Acts involved s labour of great difficulty (hear, hear), lie therefore had reason to expect that the subject would be treated with all possible intlul gence, so as to reader the new enactments perfect and effective (Hear, tear.) The Bill now before the House had had several amendments added since its original formation. These would un dergo dieeussion on a subsequent occasion. One important, and l i he thought useful, alteration, related to the seizure of foreign ves sels. he old regulation was, that a foreign vessel, having on board contraband goods, became liable to niters if found within eight leagues of our coasts. Ile proposed that the liability should only extend to foreign vessels discovered within one league of our shores. Another atnenlment related to searching of persons. The principle he had in view was to prevent any unnecessary restraint upon the liberty of the subject, at the same time that the revenue should be protected by the preventiorrof smuggling. The preser ' regulation sus picion the officer the person of anyhndividual. Now it was proposed by the new Bill 'to *Cord Individuals the right of requiring the officer to take ahe suspected person before a Justice of Peace. or superior officer comment to administer an oath, and the officer must not proceed to search until the Justice of the Peace or supe rior officer is satisfied that there are reasonable groan+, tfbr suspi cion. It is further intended to secure the individual, by subjecting the officer to a penalty, should the Justice of the Peace or superior officer consider that th seizure was offensive or vexatious. By this regulation the rights of the subject and the revenue also would be guarded. Another alteration which he intended to propose was, with respect to persona found lurking within five miles of tke coast, and suspected of being engaged to assist ih'the • f contra band hmods. By the present law such pen set to heavy penalties, but to protect the right Of, was proposed to Insert a clause subjecting the Ater to a Eeavy penalty for seizing any individual upon vetestieets , or inadequate grounds. Mr. BERNAL sruSitilling to give every credit to the Government for the atrention'they had given to this subject. It was a matter of great itueortance to render the confused mass of laws enacted to prevent smuggling more intelligible. lie could not agree with the provision which recognised right of personal search, even under he modified circumstances proposed by the Hon. Gentleman. Air, BERRIES suggested the propriety of postponing the dis cussion on this subject untllahe clause came before the Committee. Mr. BERNAL was willing to comply with the Hon. Gentle man's suggestion, if it met the views of the Committee. Mr. BRIGHT wished particularly to know those parts of the proposed enactments which were old and those now introduced. Dr. LUSH INGTON objected to the provision giving the right to search foreign ships without extending a reciprocal right to other coantries. This enactment would hereafter be used as a :precedent to the great injury of our maritime interests. If a ship under a foreign flag, haring on board contraband goods, be discovered within four leagues of our shores, should half the ship's crew be British subjects, the ship is liable to seizure and the cargo to con fiscation. He could not reconcile such • provision with the law of nations or the rights of British subjects. This act, however, was not continedloßritish subjects, but referred to foreign vrisels as well; and he thought that such a principle was dangerous to be adopted by this country. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that ifs vessel came to this country under a Freoch flog, but attended with filth dr. eumstanoes u to amount almost to a demonstration of them inten tions being to evade the Revenue Laws of Lis country, he consi dered that it was not violating the law of nations to prevent them from doing this. The provision was a defensive one. What right had any persons to be engaged under a French flag to smuggle goods into this country ? Under the circumstances which this Act required the vessel to be previous to its being subject to seizure, he would ask whether it was not a fair presumption that the object of a vessel so circumstanced was to smuggle, and if so, would it not be justifiable to seize her? It had been objected that there was no crtain facts required to be proved of the intention of the par ties. and that it was only on presumption that these seizures would be made. It was, however, the object of this clause to state what 'evidence should be considered as suspicious, and such as should justify a seizure. They could not wait for a demonstration bf the intentions of the parties; he therefore would say that this deflhi., tion of their intentions was considered aufficiettt, and they had ne ver given rise to any complaint whatsoever on the part of France. Unless they were disposed to abandon the principle of seizure en tirely, they must retain a clause of this description. This clause had been in operation fee forty or fifty yuus, and no complaints had been mule against it, and therefore he contended it ought not now to be rejected. Dr. LUSHINtiTON did not wish to throw any obstruction in the way t but he could not agree to the principle on which this clause was founded. If lie thought it was according to the principle of the law of nations he would not oppose it • but they should re. members hat if they insisted upon this principle other nations would act upon it against us. If they determined that no vessel with a French flag should be within 21 miles of our coast the French would adopt the same course. The object of this provision ass not unknown, and it would be taken advantage of by those woost io terests it went so materially to affect. Mr. DENAIAN must say. that he looked at many of the clauses of this Bill with It degree of horror ; they went beyond what she just interests of men required; and there was something ‘ bar barous in the very terms of this law. The seizure took place first, and then erne a resistance, in which blood was shed, and after that it came to an idle inquiry in some Court of Law, whether it was it murder or no murder ; a sort of power came lagging behind after all the mischief was done, to decide whether there was a right of selzwv or ao. How was it possible that the persons on board, COMM4II English sailors were to know that the persons in the sat. petted vessel were his Majesty's subjects or trot Why, the na. site Hindno and the Lamar were his Majesty's subject*: so thus. whether they had the right in the first instance of taking the vessel by this law, was to depend upon an inquire after th e f ee t h a d hap pened. Ile also objected to the clause which went to empower AagiAtrates to take cognizance of the complaints of poor men who might suffer from the acts of the revenue officers; he considered they ought to have the benefit of a trial before a Jury. Another most monstrous clause in this law was—that where, alter a eririve had been made wrongfully, and the question should be tried, if the Judge should certify that there was a reasonable cause for making the seizure, then the damages were cut down to twopence. It would cert.iinly be better to let the ease be decided by a Magic. trate, than any such a mere pretence of a trial should oust. After a few o'usatations by 51r. /kettles, Sir R. WILSON, and the Crineeght.cia of the hectitoshism, the clause was put Arai agreed to. Mr. HERMES Introduced • clause to empower Custom-house offices, to search tine persons of individuals arriving on the coast. Mr. GORDON opposed the introduction of the clause. espe daily, he observed. DS the question was now under consideration in a Court of Law. The practice of searchieg was a mast indelkote one, particularly as it regarded females ; and he thought tia re venue had much better sustain any loss that might accrue, than subject any individuals to such a proceeding. Alt BERRIES said his chief motive In lueng this clause was to determine at once the question, which was now at issue in a Court of Law. It was utterly impossible to prevent smuggling, even to n considerable extent, unless some power of search were siren to the officers of Customs. 3lr. BRIGHT and Mr. Hoye opposed the clause. Air. HUSK ISSON said that many persons made considerable sums of money by pin ' - frequently from Calais to Dover, aud car rying prohibited goods about their persons. In his opinion, unless such acts was precasted by law, the evil would boson a very grekt one. Mr. HUME said, that if such persons as those alluded to by the Eight Ilonouzable Ueutletuac were Lucien. it would be easy to S i ' procure a search warrant, and then to exumile them. If such a , power, as that p ropneed, were given to C;ea , , , n House Officers, the most disgraceful scenes would doubtless tic-ur, aid he thought the profit b the revenue ought not to be put in competitioo with the liberty of the subject. Mr. G. LAMB said, that however troublesome such a mode of proceeding might be, lie feared it was nec.ss ar y. Mr. GORDON said, that whenever a person was suspected of smuggling after the manner alluded to, a search warrant was ob tained. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that the by changing the port be frequ ente d, m i g h t easily elude this proceeding. After some further diacusainst, the reception of the clauaetrao p.,stpirend.' A c.nveritntion ensued as to sonic other clauses of the Rip, after s! :.'t 01. chairman reported progreaa, and obtained leave to sit h,;.iin on Monday next Ire other Orders of the day were then disposed of, and the Hama, at HALT-Pase TWO o'CLoca, adjourned to Monday next. LIST OF THE MINORITY' ,or HITT WHO VOTED RGAIWST THE NRINGIND 171 , THH REPORT Of THE SILL rOR GRANTING TO THE DUKE Or CLYMIIERLARD 6,0001. • TEAR FOR THE EDUCATION or HIS SON. Astell, W. Graham, Sir S. Smith, W. Blake, Sir F. Gaskeil, 13. Smith. J. Brougham, H. Hume. J. Sefton, Lori Banal, R. Hutchinson Hon. C. SykesD. Boughton, Sir T. R. Hobhouse. J. C. Tremayne, J. IL Calcraft, J. Howard, Hon. H. Taylor, M. A. Cavendish. H. Hurst, R. Titrnev, Rt. Hon. G. Calvert, N. James, W. Wood; Ald. Corbett, P. Pane, J. Williams. J. Chaloner, R. Kempe T. L. 'Whitmore, W. W. Dircnir rt, D. Lamb. 'Hon. G. Wells. J. Drake, T. T. It( ilbank, M. Western, J. C. Drake, W H W. T. Maule. on. W. Williams, Sir R. Detains, W. J. Munk, J. P. Doman, T. Ilarjoribanks, S. TILLERS. Ellis. Hun. A. Palmer. C. F. Ridley, Sir IL W. Ellice, E. Pryae, P. Wane; J. A. Eians, W. Price, R. Fellows, W. H. Pelham, J. C. sive or?. Fargebarsen, A. Rowley. Sir W. Arland, Sir T. ritssrerski. Rt. 1in.31. Rumbigd, C. E. Burdett, Sir F. Oradell, P. Robinson. Sir G. Ferguson. Sir R. Grant, J. P. Rice, T. S. Kearchbull. Sir E. Oman, J. Foberts iW . ~. . Wharton, J. A LIST OF THE MINORITY OF TWENTY-THREE, WHO VOTED FOR MI. HlTitled MOTION, " That leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the 25.1 Geo. IL c. 31., and to make better provision for the encouragement of seamen, and the more effectual manning of his Majesty's Navy." Allen, J. A. Graham, Sirs. Palmer, Fyabe Burdett, Sir F. Grenfell, Panne Rice, Spring Bernal, R. Hobhouse, J. C. Robertson, AIDS. Blake. sir Francis Hutchinson, Ilea. H. Wane. J. A. Cole, Sir C. Hurst, R. Western, C.C. Evans, Wrn. James, Wm. Forbes, Sir C. Loshington, Dr. TELLMIL CRenorchy, Lord Monk, J. B. Hume, Joe. Grattan, James Newport, Sir JOlll3 Sykes, Mad. PRICES OF IsitiTtbd STOCKS YESTERDAY. Bank Stork 231 India Bonds 47 pm 3 per Cent. Red. 89i i Long Ann. 213 II per lent. Cons. Ex. Bills, 1.000/. 24 VMS 24 pet Ditto Acet. 901 ij_ Ditto, 19111. 24 26 29 pm 31 per Cent. Red. 97t 111 Ditto. Small 223 23 pen India for Atct. 279 Lottery Tickets, 191. 191. PRICES OF FOREIIiN Brazilian Bonds Ditto Scrip (1825) Ditto Acct. 14 dis Colondtian Bonds 831 Ditto Bonds (18C24) IsSi f 6 Ditto Aect. 851 ti tit Danish Bonds 102$ Ditto Scrip (1826) Ditto Acct. 34 di* French Renee% 6 pr Ct. 101 f. 50c. Exchange 25f. 10c. Greek Bonds 47 DittoSedp(ll32s)l2f44llll24lis Ditto Acct. In 4 111 12 dis ttlis YESTEir 1)AI . Illesican Bonds 75 44 Ditto Acct. 74/ S lEtto Scrip (18251 3$ dis Ditto Acct. dis Peruvian Bonds Ditto Scrip ( 1825) Ditto Acct. G Prussian Bonds 100$ Ditto Acct. Russian Bonds 941 j Spanish Cons. 214 1 Ditto Acct. 214 f I Ditto Cons. (1823) 19 14 l! Ditto Acct. 194 19 COUltok: OF EXCH. Amsterdam C. F. 12 2 Ditto at sight 11 19 Rotterdam ...........2 U. 12 3 Antwerp 12 3 Ilamburgh ..24 U. 30 9 U. 30 10 Finis, 3 dsys'sight "5 20 Ditto U. 24 46 Bouideaux 26 46 Berlin 7 0 Frank. on Main Ex. M. 151 I.N(E YESTERDAY. Leghorn ao Genoa 45i Venice 27 Malta 0 Naples 41 Palermo per oa. 1211 Lisbon 51} Oporto M Rio Janeiro 47 Bahia 50 Dublin Cork .... 911 Petersburah, rble. 3 434. J 4 Vienna, efrerthe fi. 2M. 9 64 Trieste diu0....... 9 64 Madrid Cadiz 36 36 3h auttiox,Pst OS. Z. a. 4. PortugalGoldin coin° • 0 Foreign Gold in bars 3 17 101 New Doub;o. , ns. 0 0 0 New Donarr 0 4 lit Slicer in bars. stand 0 0 0 Seville X liibrsltar. ..... 3l 'RICES OF SHARES YESTERDAY MINIM Stin r, . ro.M. Premium per Snore. Anglo-Mexican £lOO 26 gel Anglo-Chalon lOO 6 4 Braidlian lOO 0 01 10 Bohr 60 3 214 224 214 „olivar .........„. . ‘Ol . aillian lOO 6 7 Colombian lOO 6 22 Cornwall anti Devonshire 6O 6 If dia Cobalt and Copper 6O 2 4 14 1 I 4 Famatina „.... ......... 250 124 . 6 General 31ining Association ... 106 11 10 11 Ilanganese 2O 2 21 1 V Pasco Petuvin lOO 6 12 114 12 11l 12 Potosi, lea Pat, and Peruvian 60 6 $4 6 Tialpuxahua 4OO 20 170 United Almiican 4O 20 23 Ditto New 4O 10 24 23 ASSURANCE COMPANIES. Alliance British and Foreign lOO 10 61 6 Ditto 31arine.................» ISO 6 1 Protector Fire GAS LIGUT AND COIL COMPAX ill. Continental IN II 444 ills MISCELLANEOUS. Australian lOO 3 274 British Iron Company lOO I 2i 2; f British Rock and Patent Sale frO I 141 I British Shipping Loan Camp lOO 1 Canada IOU 10 18 4 274 28 Egyptian 2OO 4 14 3 4 Equitable Loan Bank lO 1 Great Westminster Dairy 2l 4 dia Imperial Plata Glass lOO 2 14 Mexican ...... 100 10 c " dis Pearl Fishery (Yellow) 23 $ 84 14 1 Ditto (Wkita) .....-- 12 Peruvian ...... IN I I dis 1ti..0.1e la PlataAgric.Company IN —I-4 4 a - • --x -- DRURY-LANE THEATRE. This Evening. SATURDAY. June 11. will be perforated THE DEVIL AND DR. FAUSTUS. The Principal Characters by MegaraWallack,Terry. Harley. Browne. Archer. Belford, Fltawllfaul. and Peaky; Mesdames btxtdaetta. I. Paton, mad Pone,. After which. DER FREiscIIDTZ. Caspar Mr. Remit Adolph. Mr. T. Cooke: Bernhard. Mr. Bedford : Herao c : Mr. t,her.fr; Milan, Mr. Iltawilliant. Louis', filo Grad den; Rine. 11;ita Posey. CI:TENT-GARDEN TIIFATRE. This Erculns. SATURDAY, June 11, will be perfumed' THIE BELLE'S STRATAGEM. Our!court, Mx. C. Kemple; Lotitla Reidy. Mall 'YOU. After which, THE BARBF:11 OF SEVILLE. _Rwina„ Miss M. Tree. HAYMARKET 7WEATRE. Tills Evening, SATURDAY, June 11, u Le perfoegoad THE SCHOOL FOR SCANDAL. Sir Peter Teazle. Mr. Dowton; Joseph Surface, Mr.Clarkson; Clarice !twines. Mr.Vlaing. Lady Teazle, Mrs. Da.istin. • After which, THE IRISHMAN IV LONDON. Murtoell Delany, Master Burke. lo conclude with YOUTH, LOVE, AND FOLLY. Baron de llrtaneourt. Nr.%% 'Warne; Louls de Lineal, lie. lestroie Florimond, Mr. Viniuk; Antoine, Mr.llllltlnsou. Arinettc, Mrs Hurnby; Bona, Mrs. 1. HilL ENGLISH OPERA HOUSE. to oonsequenase of some extensive alterations to be calliolled ir the Sta...e and Orchestra of the Theatre, preparatory to the ton.ll,llge imiit of the summer season of the English °pers. the Web ate M(...; sopectfully apprised that they will And MR. MATHEWS AT ROM! 'llls [venial". SATURDAY, June tl, being positively the pat Ig'.t but Two. MR. MATHEWS' MEMORANDUM.Roing of Peettlidaties, Characters aud Manners. oellerateti (Hahn ham various Trips. sews—"Memoranda in Confusion"—"Night Coach - -" Babble'. a_j k .vel.ll Song—. sailing Match"—" Old and New "lance— . Ps h...; 9IMO, Row-street.° roar 111.—A Monopoiylogue, to hoeing* THE CROWN INn...DANGER. pews open at Seven; the Performane• m POll3lllOlllllll atEllikt • ROTA!, GARDENS, YAUXIIALL. ENDER THE ESPECIAL PATRONAGE OF THE KING. On MONDAY EVENTING NEXT, the 13th of June, thd resthig and oplendid Anitneniente, Qt conlitant bueverel. , n, &cm el'lN^k till Twelve, wileh hare received snot, unb.naidel 11171080 ,4 the preceding Ninths. t f l he Repeated, with addlticne: LISiII.II3I • be Joan JFei• at SfVOl.-.ACtinille!Wg:lo 6 114.