The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-11-11 00:00:00

P tbedi of Commons, and, they might add, the people of England, 1 now only to contend with the House of Lords—Abet last went of bigotry when the battle wosid be fought to the last. ' Learned Oentleman theu moved a resolution, that as the cir. uf tracts throughout the country, in order to remove diftinutoas opinions respecting the views end religion of the Catholics woo an obp.ct of primary importance, and as it could not be effected llesa at considerable expense, funds for the purpose should be eillsered in every possible way. The resolution was seconded by Eyston, Esq. and passed tassimessly. - - - - -- - - - 11Ir. Patty c• then poseented himself to the Meeting, and coin. mooted on the various points usually 'deemed in support of Catho lic emancipation. Two mechanics afterwards addressed the Assembly, one of whom miggested the propriety of accompanying the various tracts emulated by the society, with the sanction of the Catholic Clergy, as many persons did not believe that the liberal sentiments ad vanced in them were generally entertained by the Catholics. 31s. RnLsl hoped, that as so large it , portion of the press was so corruptly influenced against the Catholics, every means would be med to employ a free and uncdrrupted press in their favour. A gentleman alluded to meetings that were held weekly at the ,see Head, Cateaton-street, called " the Christian Evidence Society." m which he said blasphemous doctrines were broached and profited to the chairs resolution calling on the Lord Mayor so prevent its continuance. The SECILTARY said, that although no one could deprecate OVQ• a society more than he did, be conceived the association would be departing from its legitimate course by entering on the limussion of such a subject. Mr. FOLEY tiro moved the thanks of the Meeting to a Protest ant clergyman, the Rev. Mr. Bird, for the liberal sermon preached by hint at Appleby, on the 12th August last, before the Judges of Assize. The Rev. Clergyman, he observed, was a worthy scholar of the venerable Bishop of Norwich. The motion was seconded by Mr. Rotes, and passed unsni mous/y. MT. Rawsox then proposed, and Mr. Quin seconded, a resolu tion of thanks to the venerable and respected gentleman who pre sided over the Meeting, and it was received with acclamations. Mr. Buttea--My hair is thinned by age, and I have many other tokens of my approaching end ; but in the service of the Ro am Catholics my heart is still warm, and 1 am still young. At Ave o'clock the Meeting separated. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Tilt EMMY, Nov. le. We are extremely sorry to ssy that the Lord Chancellor appeared this morning in a very indifferent state of health ; and, indeed, he mad that he was in such pain as not to be able to give a judgment he had intended to give. arises v, JONES: The Loan CUANCELLOII said, in this case he would not give 4 iidgtnevt till tomorrow; and the reason of postponing it was, that if he gave judgment now, it would be such as Mr. Hart would not liar.. Mr. Holism, on the other side said, that the reason the Court had given for delaying' judgment was the very reason why he should press for it immediately. Mr. Haar could Lot venture to make Fly remark in answer to his Lordship's statement, when he recollected the very patient warmer in whicb he had been so fully heard. The LOUD CHANCELLOR said if he were to give judgment now, he would be compelled to say, No-- to the application, in e case, in which, be believed, there was a clear demand ; and, there fore he chore rattier to take four and twenty hours longer to re consider it than finally to dispose of it. The application certainly ,asked for more than the Court had ever granted. The late Mr. Bowes was considerably embarrassed in circumstances for some yens previous and down to the period of his death. 31r. Pal mer, of Gray's Inn, had been for many years his confidential friend, solicitor and agent. Mr. B. desiring to change his solicitor to 1803, confessed a judgment in the Court of King's Bench in favour of Mr. P., securing to hint the amount that m ight be found due to him when the accounts were settled. The :ranee also stipulated, that the papers should be immediately delivered up c and that if there was any dispute respecting any of the items charged against Mr. 8., Mr. Forster (a Master in the Court of King's Bench, now long since dead) should settle the same. file. B. died in the year 1810: a suit for the administration of his assets was immediately instituted, and in August, in the same year, • decree was made, referring it to the Master to take accounts and distribute the property. Proceedings went on the Master's office till the middle of the present year, when the Master made los general Report, having taken all the accounts and paid the whole of the creditors (except Mr. P.) the full amount of their de mands, and leaving still in Court nearly 14,0001. Within a day or two after the Master made his Report,-Mr. P. for the first time produced his account, amounting to about LAO/. for monies ad vantad, bills of costs, &c., which the Master, of course, refused to admit. A petition was then presented to the Master of thy Rolls, praying for liberty to prove against the surplus, which the Master dismissed without coati. Another petition was presented to his Lordship, praying pretty nearly the same thing. It was argued by Mr. Hart, on the part of Mr. P., that there was no principle in equity shutting out a common creditor from being at liberty to make a demand, upon which the statute of limitations dad DOT attach, merely because he was a few hours too late in car rying in his account for the Master's General Report ; and if that were CO, a solicitor of the highest respectability was not to be dealt more harshly with. Mr..llconnx, on the other side, argued that it was against every priociple, that a solicitor, however honourable and respeciable (who ought to have mown better), should be permitted to neglect carry. ing in his account (if he had one), which ought to have been deli_l aged in about 1803, till 11123--till after all the other creditors were Raid--till the wreck of the intestate's property was just about to be uivided among his distressed family—and till a time at which it gas quite impossible for either the person against whom the alleged demand was made, or his representatives, to stand on equal grounds atish the claimant, the one side having no materials to resist or setsuinise any item ; and the other being furnished with every thing ussessary to support his demand. Mr. HART admitted great laches:on the part of his client, but Wes reason of his delay was, that he considered it quite hopeless ever to expect being paid, until owing to the turn a suit (Peacock w. Meredisli) took, which threw a very large sum into the intestate's Reads, and then.he immediately made out his demand. The LORD CHANCELLOR sated, that he had known Mr. Palmer professionally fora very great many years, and, during the whole of that knowledge, he had always considered him one of the moat honourable men that ever came into that Court. At the same time this was a ease that must be decided upon a general principle, applying to the most honourable man, as well as to one of a dif ferent description. -And looking at the long lapse of time (more than twenty years) that had been allowed to pass without any thing having been done, his Lordship thought it would be extremely dangerous to allow this demand to be received now, and partieu lady to suffer it in the first instance to go into the Masters office. It 'reared on the face of the feasonce, that the Recount was an ex tremely complicated one, and if it were now sent into the Master', office, in all probability another twenty years would be occupied in adjusting it. However, the Court would dispose of it to-morrow. It might be that Mr. P. might feel inclined to tile a bill. MUNN V. AQUTTER. This case, which has b e en discussed, every now and then, ever state the year 1818, again occupied a considerable portion of the esoesinji. It was discussed upon a variation of the minutes. Yesterday Mr. HART called for the Registrar's book, in which, tome time ago be had, or ought to have, entered the Court's de claration. Mr. Walker. the Registrar, said he had only taken a very short note, but be had had a statement of what passed written out soon after the discussion. Mr. Harr refused to be satisfied with any thing short of the book itself t this was called a Record Court, and he was entitled to hue the record produced. It was then .in consequence promised that the book should this morning be forthcoming, and when the case was called on, Mr. Walker said he now had the book, sad as what was entered in it was not very intelligible, he had provided himself also with a Ilium legible copy. Mr. HART read the la..fer, and was greatly dissatisfied with it. Ile declared that it did not contain one word of the Court's riccla ration, which he perfectly well recollected having begged the Court to dictate to the Registrar, that he might take it down accurately to present future mistakes or disputes. The Loan CHANCELLOR desired to be informed in what re. spect Mr. Hart objected to the note 51r. Walker had taken. Mr. Haat at some length explained himself, and then submit ted the propriety of having leave to put in an affidavit er n short. F*2l4 writer, verifying what fell from the Court on the oec.ision al. laded to. 'the Loan Cuax c ELLOR said. he really could not sec but that the reitord complained of contained, in effect, exactly what Alt. [fart seemed to wish, and in the terms in which it should have been expressed. Ibe only question was, what unstruction the Mas. tar was to put upon the words in the order of reference. And upon Inn question the Court would hear one Counsel on a side, on any day they might name convenient to themselves. This case had got into a tut degree of confusion, In all probability, In a great eptuture through his Lordship himself, but he was ecnain, it was niso in a great measure in consequence of some Counsel or other having been absent when the case was before the Court from time to time. Mr. }lotions said, this observation could not apply to him, be. cafe be had been present at all times when the cue was men- Uoned. Mr. Harr then submitted, that the best way would be, to let the . miasqtes be deawn up into an order as they now stood. and than for the parties tO have liberty to re-argue the thole case by as man, Counsel aa they pleased. This Loantistaxcut.Loa- —No, certainly I will not permit any sock line of proceeding ; I have had enough of that already. (inc t;uonsel crnly, and no more shall be at liberty to argue the point I hare mentioned. or to re-argue the whole cause. And now the Lase stands for the option of the parties. 'VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, Nov. 18. not having been in attendmes at the time It wits cared on Would perhaps induce his honour to accede to his application. The case stood tenth on the list. Mr. Purvis's clerk was instructed to witch it, that he-might give information of its tieing about to be called on to Mr. Purvis, who was to have apprised him (Mt. Health. This plan had been defeated by the rapid manner in which the preceding cases had been di s p ose d of'. Under these circumstances he hope his Honour would restore this welt.watched case to Its place. , The VicE-Cuarretittoa had no objection to this particular cane being restored, on the usual terms, but tine was not to be eon aidered as a precedent, for he Mould, for the future, strictly adhere to the rule he had laid down. J.ANCAST Ea V. ATIINSOn. Mr. HEALD and Mr. PIIILLIMORt were fur the plaintiff; Mr. HfoRNE and Mr. FISHER for the defendant. Mr. PHILLISOIE stated, that the bill prayed that an account might be taken of certain monies which the defendant had poestemed herself of, and that the same might be divided into two equal shares, and one paid over to :he plaintiff The plaintiff was the wife of J. Lancaster ; her maiden name was Mary Atkinson, and she was the sister of the defendant, Isabelle Atkinson. William Atkinson, the father of these parties, was possessed of a consider. able personal estate. In 1307 he made his will, in which. efla be queathing various legacies, he gave all hisestatee. personal and real, to his two daughters, subject, however, to the payment of hit debts. He died on the lit February, 1821. After hie death, his daughters took possession of all his estates, and paid off thick:Ms. The bill then went to state that the testator, who was very old and infirm. gave up to the plaintiff, hit eldest daughter, fifteen Months before his death, the keys of his eltek and scrutoire. This was is the presence of the defendant. He then told them that there was a great deal of gold locked up there, and that they were not to touch it till his death, when they might divide it between them, but to take care in the mean time to le( no one know that it *as there. Shortly after this, however, they went to the rooms where the desk and scrutoire were placed, and opened them both. In the desk they found 700 guineas, and in the scrutoire 100, along with a seven-shilling piece. After having counted it, they toot the 700 guineas front the desk, and put them into the scrutoire with the remainder. When this was done, the elder sister, the present plaintiff, put the keys in her pocket. About the month of September, or October, 1819, the defendant funned the pion for getting the keys into her own possession. For this purpose, she pretended to her sister that shc did not think the money quite safe. The plaintiff, upon this, proposed to go up and count. ,'hey ac cordingly went up and counted it, and found all right. The bill then went on tout', that the defendant, a little afterwards, asked her sister for the keys to look for some rings that were in the scru toire. The plaintiff gave the keys to her sister, who immediately put them into her pocket, anti told her sister she should never have them again. In order to secure them, she, in the day-time, always had them in their pocket; and in the night ettached them to her waist. In short, she had possession of them till her father's death. After that event, the plaintiff applied to the defendant for the keys, that they might examine stet divide the contents of the ecru- Mae. The defendant said that she had better go to Mr. Atkinson (a Solicitor) first, according to their father's direction ; and that when she came back they would open the errutoire. The plaintiff. accordingly, went to Mr. Atkinson, and when she came back her sister agreed to open the scrutoire. It was accordingly opened, and the defendant directly drew out a drawer in it, and seeing it empty, cried out the had been robbed. This, however, was not one of the , drawers into which they had put the money. Coon opening ano ther, and seeing it also empty. the defendant cried put again she had been robbed. The plauniffthereupon charged her-with having I taken it away whilst she was gone out, and that abe knew she bad not been robbed. The bill further charged the defendant with having . obtained possession of the key in an unfair manner, and of admitting it was so. That she hail made such adrniseion would be sufficiently clear. The plaintiff; in the presence of her sister, told a person named Phoebe Kitchen, of the manner is which ha sister had obtained the keys, and of the money that was in the scrutoire. 'l'he defendant heard this and did not deny it. After the defend. ant had obtained possession of the keys, her father desired her to give them again to her sister, but the defendant refused, and said as she had got them she would keep them. She had kept them, she had possession of the scrutoire, and the plaintiff now came taro Court for her moiety of the money. Mr. FISHER, for the defendant, now read her deposition. It agreed with the plaintiff's in describing the manner in which their father give them the key. It then went on to state that she had reason to think that the plaintiff had some other key that would open the scrutoire. The deposition further stated that the deo°. nent had been informed and believed that her sister had lodged 1001. at a banker's in Whitehaven. When this information reached her she charged her sister with the fact, but she denied it. After this the deponent asked her sister what money there was in their fathers' house, but the plaintiff would not tell her, and said she should do just as she liked. The deponent then went to the banker's, and the clerk informed her that Pherbe Kitchen had lodged money there. This she believed was done for the Plain. tiff. About September, 1.110, the deponent had occasion to go to her father's bed-room. The above-mentioned desk was in this room ; the scrutoirc was in a back-room, which could only be got at but through her father's bethroorn. 'When she entered the room, the door o' the back-room was open, and she there paw her sister with two bags of gold in her hands. She naked what they were ? Her sister informed her that it was the gold her father had men. tioned. The deponent was not able to wait, as she had to go down stairs to her father; she, however, returned very soon afterwards; and saw her sister coming out of the back room. She did not see the gold bags, so that she supposed they had been put into the scrutoire. She saw the keys on the table and took them up, telling her sister she bad bad them long enough. She offered, however, to return them, provided the plaintiff would tell her how she came by the 1001. in the bank of Hartley and Co. The defendant further deposes, that she never looked into or unlocked the scrutoire till after her father's desttt,except once,and that was merely to put seine writings IntO it, nor did she then, or on soy occasion, till startler father's death, search or look for any of We money. Up to her father's death she firmly believed the gold bugs were in the scrutoire. When her sister first asked her for the keys rafter her (*Ma's death, she was ill, and told her sister that she could not go then, and that sins thought the plaintiff ought to see Mr. Atkinson the solicitor first. When she saw the drawers were empty, she charged the plaintiff with having robbed both her and their father. This was all she knew of the matter. Mr. HEALD then rose for the plaintiff. By the deposition they had just heard the defendant did not deny having taken the gag, nor that she had taken such tare of the keys. The plaintiff had evidence to prove these facts. The ease, however, appeared totim to lie in a very narrow compass. These two ladies were only daughters, and their father was so old and infirm that they were ex trentely a xious to chew their affection by taking care of his pro. perty. By reason of this anxiety the defendant had contrived to get possession of the gold, which was not forthcomi ng when he died. There is no doubt she took it during the life-time of her father ; but whether it was during his life or atter his death was not material to him, because he could show she had it in her possetivion. - It appeared that fifteen months before the testator's death the keys were in possession of his eldest daughter. The *awoke bad been truly described as being in a back worn. It would be well to state, in addition, that this back room was the sleeping apartment of the two sisters till the eldest married, when the defendant slept there by herself. This was proved by a person named Mary Walker. The same witness also proved that a qu arre l t oo k place in her presence between the sisters, in the course of which the defendant charged the plaintiff with having robbed the house. When the plaintiff heard this charge, she pro. posed going up stairs to count the gold, to see if she had robbed the house. The witness, Mary Wslker, further says. that the two sisters went up stairs, and returned in about half an hour. The plaintiff came down crying, and said her sister had taken the keys from her. The testator shook his head, and desired the defendant to give the keys back to her sister. The defendant, however, said she would not, and walked up and down in a triumphant manner. The witness further says, that she saw the defendant often, and that she always had the key round her waist. Another witness, l'hebe Kitchen, in answer to several interrogatories, said that she wee told by the plaintiff, in presence of the defendant, of the manner in which she had got the keys, and that the plaintiff appeared afraid the defendant would destroy the will, as she had now the emi t:nand of it. Upon this the witness told her Om need not be afraid of the will, as her sister had an equal intermit in pre serving it. The plaintiff then said that it was not only the will, but all that money, pointing to a paper on the table, which had 817 guineas written upon it. Now it was proved, ob served the Learned Counsel, by another conversation, that the de. , fendant said she took the keys because she feared her sister would dealeo the will; but he did not find, in any renege of the answer, that the defendant accounted for the manner in which the gold departed. The VicE-CniorCiLLOß—Was the taking during the father's life then ? Mr. LlE.sxm--That is not materiel to our rare. The ificl7:CmatmaLoa—Mut if it Mra during the life of the father, it amounts to a felony. Mr. 111:m.D-.-1 am aware that it would then become a felonious act, but would not amount perhaps to more than a freach of trust. i The Vlcw.eltsticat.t.ua—llow can that bey She had no quo. Mr. 13Eaus...-I won't pretend to say that she took it during her' father's lifetime, or even that she took it at all. We merely trace the possession of the ecrutnire which contained Ow gold to her. The bill appears to say she took it after his .lest h. The VICE-CIIAT4 cELLoa—That is material. Mr. 1101INE—Certainly It is. Mr. PHI LLI 310 RE—The charge In the bill is, that she put of? opening the scrutoire after the death of the father, on pretence of illness. Mr. Iftsz.n--The question is, whether this is a possession of the property of the testator y She is proved to be in possession of the scrutoire containing the gold, and we now call upon her to give us our moiety. Thr VicE.CitmccELLort asked for a copy oftw erlJence,whieli was handed to him. Mr. Pitt Lit MORE then read some further evidence of Mary Walker's, but it wainot material. The VICE- CHANCELLOR. then asked what evidtnco there was on the part of the defendant? Mr. Franz R, for the defendant, then read the evidence of a clerk in the bank of Hartley and Co., at IVhitehaven, named Harrison. He proved that in March, 1819, 2001. was put to thecredit of Atkinson. Another witness, who knew the plantiff proved that she had once put some money into her hands, and told her it was 1001. and directed her to carry it to the bank. 11'i:nest could not read. She gave the money in at the bank, and they gave ber a check, which she carried to the plaintiff. Mr. Hours here begged to call his Honour's attention to Mary Walker's age. She was only sixteen al:en czaagled upon • •'‘ - IrVl 1 sus • iftierin •rimr•vr Tlr • interrogatories,and then spoke to events which must Lave happened when she was only twelve. ' The. Vicx.CHANcrLLoß,said he bad Observed. Mr. HEALD—But her evidence is confirmed by others. Mr. Frsite:g proceeded with reading hisdepositions. The de. fondant further deposed, that she had been informed ber sister had told some she had deposited 2901. in Hartley's lisnk, from the savings oitt of her father's income, whilst she had the manage. resent of his affairs, 'The defendant did not think that her sister could have made any such haring, but thinks that it was part of the gold out of the seruteity. . The testimony of a witness named Mary Ann Burns was then read. She had resided in the house of the testator. During the first part other residence, the plaintiff kept the key . of the scrutaire ; during the last part it was the defendant. The witness then spoke to the two sisters quarreling and leaving the room to go and count the money. r,laintiff came down stairs crying, and told her father that the &ROW had the keys. The team= asked for the keys, and his ydrufgeig daughter gave them to him. Be put them into . his pocket, and Shortly afterwards gave them had' again to the de fendant, saying that she might have them and welcome. The VICE-CtrAsc E LLo a—This is in direct contradiction to the eildence of the plaintiff and Walker. The case shall go before a Jary. I shall order both the sisters to be examined. There is gross perjury on one side or the other; it must go before a Jury. Jilr. H EA LD-1 have no objection. Mr. Hon NE—My only objection is the extreme poverty of my client. Mr. HEALD—Why, you have got the gold. Mr. Ho ns E—No. nor Dever had. The VIC F. CIIANC rum n—l tis a matter of great suspicion. It is not credible that the father would give the keys back to the defendant. 111 r. Hos srg—lt is an admitted fact. TIE E Ving-Citauczt.r.ort —All the other witnesses prove the contrary. Mr. IlonNE—.l ern sorry that your Honour has that im pression. The VIC E-CHANCE r.t.o fi —1 wish you could remove the sus picions I entertain from my mind. 111 r. 11 ottxE—lt is highly desirable that no further expense should be incurred. hoes your Honour think that the plaintiff has made out the first point that was required, viz. the existence of the money ? The VIcE-rtralretxx.on-1 think they have. There is such gross perjury, that it is fit it should go to a Jury. Mr. HORNE—If it is to go to a Jury, whit him must the issue be in ? Is it to be considered the testator's money ? The V icx-CtiaxcErnon—The statement in the hill is, that after the death of the father the defendant tells her sister to go to 111 r. Atkinson, and that whilst she is gone the money is taken. Mr. llonwr—Can it not be made an action of trover ? The VICE-CtiascEt.t.on—Mhat would be the most Anton -I venient mode possible. The issue is best. Why should you have the indirect instead of the direct course? .Mr. flOßNE—There will be a vast number of facts to prove. ' The Vic:x.ora NcELLon—I tis important to justice that they should be proved. It must go to a Jury, as I before said, with Warty to the Judge to indorse any special matter, and must be tried in Cumberland. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WESTMINSTER, Nov. 10. KING AND QUEEN OF THE SANDWICH ISLANDS. RILL AND OTHERS T. STARDECR. This action was tried before the Lord Chief Justice, at the Guildhall sittings after last Trinity Term. There was a verdict for the plaintiff, and 200/. damage,. The plaintiffs were the owners of a South Sea whaler, the de fendant was the Captain. This vessel returned, after an absence two years and two months, with a cargo of 270 tuns of oil. The plaintiffs were dissatisfied with the result of the voyage, refused to pay the Captain his wages, and brought this action against him for damages, on three grounds : Ist, that he had made a devia don ; 24, that at one of - the Sandwich Islands he took on board a woman whom he kept on hoard for several months, and in conse quence neglected the interests of the plaintiff's ; :*KI, that on his re turn front the Japan seas the Capt ain took on board as passengers for this country, the King and Q ueen of the Sandwich Isles, their suite, and provisions for them d uring the voyage, whereby his voyage was lengthened, and he was unable to avail himself of the opportunities which might occur in his homeward voyage for obtaining a more complete cargo of oil, it being the ordinary practice of the Captains of Sohth Sea whalers to complete their cargoes on their return home. Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL this day moved for • new trial, on the pound that the verdict was against evidence, and against the opinion which the Judge had given in his summing up to the Jury. 1 he Court granted • rule to show cause. COVENT-GARDEN MARKET. PRINCE t•. LEWT.I. This was an action tried before the Lord Chief Justice, a few days ago,-at the Adjourned Middlesex Sessions. There wrs a nonsult. At the trial, it appeared that the defendant was a pntatoe salse man in James -street, Covent-garden ; that he placed a waggon before his door for the purpose of selling potatoes out of the market, and thereby defrauding the plaintiff of the tolls to which he was entitled, as lessee of the tolls of Covent-garden Market under the Duke of Bedford. That Covent-garden :Market is, by the charter granted to an ancestor of the present Duke of Bedford, a " market for the sale of vegetables, fruits and Bowers ;" that the plaintiff has let out a considerable part o f the market in covered stalls and china-shops ; that at some seasons of the year the market is ao completely occupied, that there is no room. On this evidence the Lord Chief Justice held, that as the plaintiff had not applied the whole of the market to the sale of the articles specified under the charter ; and that as at certain seasons of the year the market is overcrowded, the plaintiff must be nonsulted. Mr. Gl' RNEY this day moved to set aside the nonsuit and enter a verdict for the plaintiff, with nominal damages. He contended, that there was sufficient room for the defendant in the market, and that where there was such accommodation he had no right to set up his wagons for the sale of vegetables out of the market, although a part of it might he appropriated to other purposes. Mr. Justice BATLEY —Did the plaintiff ever give the defendant notice that there was room in the market ? Mr. 0 uaNF.Y—Yet ; he wan told so by the collector of the tolls of the market at the time. This occurred in January, when there is plenty of room. The LORD CHIEF Jurrxr —You are under a mistake, The collector did not say that he bad ever told him so, and this had a considerable effect on my opinion. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—This is merely a vegetable market ? Mr. GURNEY—It it : by the charter the market is for the sale of vegetables, fruits, and flower,. Mr. Justice BAILWY—My doubt is, that if it be merely a re. getable market 4 whittles, it part be applied to other purposes, there be room enough for the deteintant ? Mr. GURNEY—But we proved that there way room for him. The LOAD CHIEF JUSTICE—NI - as he desired to go into the market ? Mr. Ginaxgr—We demanded the toll of him. The Loau CHIEF JUSTICE—Yes, but you did not desire him to go Into the market. Bit. Justice BainEY—The question is here, whether each man has aright to choose his place, or wheiher the leases of the market may allot out the market as they please ? GuaxEY-1 submit that that would be no objection, if it was so. The LORD Curve JUSTICE—It appears that part of the mar. 'ket peculiarly approprtated to the sale of vegetables is set out for annual renters, whereby the market is kept from the venders of vegetables. The question is, whether, under such circumstances, you are entitled to complain ? Mr. CinatrEY—The defendant has no right to complain of this, provided there be room for him. Mr. Zustice LITTLEOALX—IIave not the public a right to choose what part they please! Ifere you let one-half for stands, and a quarter for crockery-stalls, so that the public have only a quarter of the market. Mr. Gunstse—There was room enough for the defendant ; he would not take it be did not wish to take it; he had rather rc. main in James.street. _ ABUSES OF COURT. On Tuesday last nine cases were successively called on and struck DC the list on account of Counsel not being in attendance. Tks Court was in coneenuenee obliged to break spat we early hour, ea taws was no businem to go on with. Tale .morning Mr. lize-ati made an application to the Vice. tlatecellor to have the cave of Hillbanky a. Cocks, which had been Mrtillit of with the other, restored to the list. The ressoo for hie 1 _____w _.. - . . The LORD CHIEF Jtterict —Take a rule to show cau•.c. notvEnn V. YOUNG. This action was tried before Mr. Justice Burrough, at the last baked Assizes. It WAS an action on the cape for negligence, agatpct the defendant, who ia an attorney, for not taking sufficient securities on the advance of a sum of money by the plaintiff on mortage. There was a second count, in which it was stated that the defendant, knowing the securities to be insufficient, bedew:ivied the plaintiff to take diem. There was pleaded first, the geneni issue ; second, the Statute of Limitations. There was a verdict for the defendant. Cuitwoon now moved Inc a new trial, on the ground of misdirection by the Learned Judge. The plaintiff, be said, had been a poor man, and had accumulated 3,0001. by his industry. He wished to lay this money out on gond security, and be applied to the defendant, who In an attorney at Gloucester, with special in. otruetions to obtain for him freehold land security, and said that he would tsko nothing else. The defendant told him that he did not know of any such security at the time, but if he would wait, h e had no doubt he could get it. This was agreed to, and defendant put, an advertisement into a Gloucester paper, stating that such a sum was ready to be advanced on freehold land 'security. A few days after, two brothers. of the name of Olaye, called, in answer to this advertisement. The plaintiff was satisfied with the land which they offered as a security for his 3,C001..--Of the validity of the title he of course knew nothing, for this he relied on his solici tor, who, told him it was gond. A warrant of attorney was pre pared and delivered to bins on his paying the motley over to them in tbia being presented, the old man was surprised, and said, " ta this bit of paper all j am to have—ant I not to have some parch ment P The defeodant told him the deeds would be ready for him in a fortnight or duo weeks. the 3,000/. which teas paid by the plaintiff, one thousand was kept by the defendant, probably in settlement of some old account with the Olives. The deeds, in. stead of being ready in three weeks, were not ready for sixteen inoptha, and then they were sent in a sealed packet, which the Plaintiff was derred not to open. This trensactinn took place in February, 1814. The old man, after keening his deeds sealed up for some time, began to be rather curbing *bout their contents. and sent them for examination to an attorney residing at Berkeley. Iliiii,gentleman, on ezatnivation, found that the properly on which the 3,0001. had been advanced, had bees conveyed to sinewy Olavm by their father / subject to, the payment of all. his debts, and that.there tease very impoisaut deed wanting.. (tit this he im mediately wrote to, the defendant, Mr. Young, stathigthette•eir connuancein sea had a reply. in which Mr. Young stated that he had the deed in qu:stion in has own possession, on which he pro. -77.='"r,.-: :.-t:--= posed to make an eschange of leasehold lands for the freehold lands., on which the 3.190 AL was secured. One of the (Naves after , wards died, and subsequently, in the year lht2tt, &commission of bankrupt ,issued against the survivor. The whole of this teens action wee then brought to light, and it was discovered that he had no title whatever to the lands on which the money was advanced. The plaintiff brought this action in consequence against Mr. ;Leung, for negligence in taking such secutity. The . Learned Judge, said llr. Curwood, was very laconic in his summing, and lamely left it to the Jury to say whether there was any fraud in the `transaction. The Jury consulted together for some time, at which I the Judge expressed same surprise, saying that he had been at the bar forty years, end on the bench so many years, and that he could see no fraud. The Jury were finally of the same opinion, and found• for the defendant. The Learned Coensel now contended that this trineaction &es tainted with fraud ; that consequently on the principles established by certain recent cases the statute of limits tioni would not run, and on this ground moved for a new trial. The CHIEF JUSTICE—What was the misdirection ? Was it on the effect of the statute of limitations ? MT. CURWOOD—Tea. The Court granted the rule. COURT OF C031370N PLEAS, TIIUIIIIDAY, Nov. 10. Sittings in Banco. Tha Court oat this morning till half-past twelve o'clock, but no am of any public interest occurred. In the nurse of the morning a person. who had been confined for debt in the Fleet Prison. was heard on his petition, and dis charged under the Lords' Act. At one o'clock the Lord thief Juruice went into the city to try causes et Guildhall, when several causes, moat of them undefended ones, were disposed of, but all of too unimportant a nature to re quire notice. ARCHES COURT, TUURSDAY, Nov. 10. [Before Sir Join/ NrcrioLL, Knt.] HANNAM W. TIANNAM. Dr. ImentNGTON:Ill the absence ofDr. Jenner, mated that this was a snit promoted by Mrs. Harriet Hannam, to obtain a divorce from her husband, on the ground of cruelty. Dr. Lushing ton stated the libel, which contained various allegations of harshness and cruelty on the part of the husband. Several witnesses, he said, would be examined in support of the libel, the admis sibility of which, be understood, was about to he objected to. Dr. Anicotn, on behalf of the husband, objected to the admis sibility of the libel. It contained various articles too frivolous to be admitted in proof. Its statements, he contended, were insufficient 'to support the suit ; and upon the whole, the Court would best consult its dignity by rejecting . it. " Sir Joists Nicaora., in giving judgment, briefly adverted to the facts of the case. He said, that the parties were married in 1823, and thet the husband very shortly after commenced the harsh treatment complained of. Mrs. Hannan, it appeared, had brought her husband a fortune of 4,3001. a-year, of which 1,0001. a-year was reserved for pin money. There was an unsettled estate, called Mount Clare, and it appeared to be the object of the husband to iltriss his wife to give up her pin money, and allow the estate to be geld'. Be had threatened to throw hot water upon ber—to put her on' the tire—to throw her nut of the window—and by such language worked upon her mind, until she considered that her life was in danger, con her directing the gardener to remove some ivy which grew in the garden, he used the most intemperate and scandalous lan guage, threatening to kick her. On one occasion he actually re sorted to personal violence. Going to Dorsetahlre on a shooting excursion, she asked to be allowed to accompany him, saying that she did not wish to remain in the house with a gamekeeper, who had treated her disrespectfully. Ile refused her request with the most insulting language, end taking her by the arm, violently pushed her into another room. He frequently treated her with the utmost indignity, obliging her to leave her bed at night to fetch him Seidlitz Doyens, by which the lady caught cold. He also obliged her to dine by herself, prohibited her from seeing a dying Mater, charged her with infidelity without any reason, and, in conclusion, absented himself from her bed since November, 1824. Upon the whole of the case the Court was of opinion that the libel was admis sible. The husband's conduct did not appear to be the effect of occasional hastiness of temper, but of a deliberate purpose, which gave to it a character of malignity that would induce the ourt to admit as evidence trivial circumstances that should be rejected in other cases. The various indignities, stated in the libel, the con stant threats of violence, and the actual infliction of violence in one case, were sufficient to direct the judgment of the Court in admit ting the petition. A proctor, named Davis, appeared at the bar, stating that he had been suspended, by order of the Court, for three years, and now produced a testintonium of his good conduct since his suspension. The Cotta?, upon inquiry, learned that the sentence did not expire until December next, and therefore refused to interfere. A gentleman belonging to the bar applied for an order to be fur nished with a copy of the costs in the case of Briscoe v. Briscoe. Ile merely applied as a member of the profession, and for his own information. Sir J. Ntcnota. was of opinion that if the reasons were stated to the Register, the application may be granted as matter of courtesy. lie would make no order to that effect. Application refused.—The Court rose at 12 o'clock. POLICie. QUEEN-SQUARE. CUTTING MID STARAIN3 • Husearru.--Yestertlay Mrs. Alice Carter, a very respectable looking woman, but much afflicted by her situation, was brought up in custody of Hudson, a patrol, and also of Pace, the officer, before Mr. IVRIT E., the sitting Ma. gistrate, charged with dangerously stabbing her husband, Mr. John Caner, a chandler and coal-dealer, at No. 22, Rochester-row, Tot. hill-fields. Pace, the officer, first stated, that hearing what had happened at ➢lr. Carter's, he proceeded to the house on 'Wednesday night, when he found the doctor sowing up the wounds, the bowels having protruded. Mr. WHITE—Then if I understand you, Pace, you were not the first upon the spot Pace—No, your Worship ; but Hudson, the patrol, who resigned Mrs. Carter to my custody, can speak to what happened before I arrived. Hudson then stated, that at lialf-past nine o'clock on Wednesday evening he was waiting for the watchmen at the Plough public house, in linehester-row, in order to see the watch set, when a gen tleman came up and said that the watch was wanted at No 22, Roehester.row, for a woman had just stabbed her husbrnd. The witness instantly proceeded there, and inquired which was the per son who had done it, when the gentleman pointed out the female now at the bar, who was standing against the counter of the shop. Witness told her that she must go with him to the watcho , ise. She answered that she was willing to go, and hoped that she nad done it. Witness then took her into his custody. Dinah Saunders sworn—Witness lodges in the first-floor front_ mom, at Mr. Carter's; she heard some noise, about 9 o'clock, on Wednesday evening, while sitting in her own room, which is over the shop. Witness went down stairs, and saw both Mr. and Mrs. Carter in the shop, but Mr. Carter was swearing that his wife should not remain in the house that night; Mrs. Carter, at this time, was behind the door, which was afterwards shut. and witness got out of their way; Mr. Carter gave his wife a violent blow, so tllai she fell neon the stones into the street, near the edge of the pavement. He said, that his wife was in liquor, but she ap peared much distressed in her mind. Mrs. Carter then got up, when the witness begged her to settle what she had to do quietly; after which, witness went up stairs, leaving Mrs. Carter in the street, and her husband in the shop, thinking that their pas sion might mutually cool. After the witness had got up stairs, and had been in her own room about five minutes, she heard a very great noise, and came again down stairs, when she found Mr. C. in s little room behind the shop and parlour, where he was stand ing, but told witness that his wife had cut him ; the wife was in the parlour. lie showed witness a wound in his stomach, and another behind his neck. %Pitney; went to the shop door, when she saw a gentleman (Pace), who came into the room, saw the wounds, and went fer a surgeon. Mr. C. told witness that his wife had got the knife in her hand with which she had inflicted the wounds, and begged the witness to put down the bed, that he might rest upon it. Witness afterwards got the kettle, which Mrs. Clack had taken from Mrs. Carter. Witness remonstrated with her on what she had done, but her reply was, " You have been a friend to me all my life, but you don't know what there is betwts man and wife." Mrs. C. added, that she had been very much treated by her husband all her life, and she was set unhappy that she did not value her life. At this period Mrs. Clack came into the room, and succeeded in getting the knife from Mrs. Carter, which else handed to the witness, who gave it to her little boy to hide up stairs under the bed. The knife appeared perfectly clean. Soon thee Dr. Parse came , who sewed up the wound, and observed that it was impossible to tell what the result might be. Mr. Carter was then taken to the infirmary, and his wife was sent to the watch_ house. Witness, in continuation, here deposed that she had heard Mrs. Carter say she was so unhappy that she intended to make away with herself. Witness had never seen Mts. Caner otherwise than sober. Pace, the officer. now produced the knife, which is a carving knife, and which was identified by the last witness as the one given to her by Mrs. Clack. Mary Clack deposed that she lodged on the same floor with the last witness. On hearing a great noise, witness went down stairs, when she found nobody but Alr. and Mrs. Caner. Mr. Carter was lying in bed, and showed the witness his wound. Wit ness grit the knife with some difficulty from Mrs. Carter, and game it to Mrs. Saunders, who sent it up stairs to be taken care of. Saw some thing which was issuing from Mr. Carter's wound, when his wife exclaimed that she was a heart-broken wolian. She was then standing by the lire, and witness saw the. gleaming of a knife. Witness knew the knife (just produced) to he the same ; there was no blond upon it, but witness then supposed that it might hare been wiped off against Mrs. Carter's petticoats. When the doctor came, he asked for the weapon with which the business had been done, and the knife was brought down stairs to hint. Hudson's first deposition was now read over to him, when he added, that when be first told Mrs. Carter she was Ms prisoner, the latter Raid she did not mind going to the watchhouse, and hoped that she had only done it to perfection. At panther- time, before several persons, she inquired if her husband was dead, and hoped that he was, as she should then know what was to become of her _ ....... Pace the officer, who had assisted in taking the prisoner down to the watchheuxe, deposed to the words just stated to hare been need by her. Ile had this morninz, been to the Infirmary, and obtained a ceititicate from Mr. Alait'..and, the douse•surgeon, who stated !!" 1 • 1 _ 1 !ms!tli• that Mr. Carter was in a very dangerous state from a pound att. he had received in the abdomen. Pace confirmed his mater na ,'" his first going to the house, where he found the poor man in bZ while the doctor was sewing up the wound. Seeing the *nerd' asked for the knife, when Mrs. Clack produced it, and hew re n .' it up in paper. While taking Mrs . C. the back way to the whaie, house, in order to avoid the !nob, she exclaimed, once or tr - Ile answered—" what business is that of yours?" adding_t,C4 you, I will knock you dowh." He immed iate l y b egan to He . set swore that I should not remain th ere any longer. He put his fingers to my throat, for when he quarrels and beat s ha always tries to chock the with Ins fingers. I, howeve r , away, and sung out murder. He iontinued to push me n when I clung to every thing I could get hold of, for I did like to be turned out of my home, but he pushed me into set with great violence on the edge nr the payment ; / La x . when I got up, " Carter, give me my shawl and bonnet, and will go any where. sooner than lire this life. I was In a oft , iot and did not know I had got &knife ; b u t I suppose I had te k e , it up in wrath. My husband has always ill used me in e t , way, and I have reason to believe, th a t I am In his way, and i i:4 .he wants to put another woman in my place. I oTcred to r *owl him. if he would allow me any thing ; but he swore. I sho o k re nothing from him, and that I might go into the stre et I;He has entirely broken my peace of mind by ill usage, so then tee ' life is a burden to me ; and when he has done alt this, he v ii ) snap his fingers in my face. He has often taken up a knife tor te swore that he war determined to b e my b utc h er one way ot t , other, and that he would wash his hands in my bean . ' bloo , " I have done it ;" and In going to the watchhoute she clasped l e ;;; of witness's arm, and made use of the expression—" I hope her= die." Witness searched her, and found upon het pers on alley . , small pm-knife, a pocket-book, fou r sovereigns, two half-aoyereig;y les. in silver, 4d. in copper, and a pencils case. Witness had knot- her for about twelve months, and believed her to be quite suit He also knew that her husband and her did not live upon Rai terms, as a warrant had been taken out by her against bet ham% about a year ago. Air. Wntrz—bin. Carter, is there any thing which you haul say ? Alm Carter—Hear me, your Worship. My husband went k . from home about eight o'clock on Wednesday evening, wh en I s —Where are you going, Caner? He said that he vase's*, Flint's, to stop a little. I said to him—Pray don't be gone l ett and leave me so much at hom e w i t h myse lf . I b egan to pet, easy. got up, and stood at the door ; and after some minutes I lava ? husband mining a different way than from Flint's. When he ale up I said—" pan have not come home the right way from Mee Carter never has walked out with me, like other men 'would Irak their wives, on i4undays, to chapel or for an airing. I had a me rant against him once, but was over persuaded to make it up, I did not intend to do what I have done, and I am sorry that I bed got the weapon in my hand. He was always beating and kickiti me, my back is nearly broken from his ill-usage, and I am orn free from black flesh. blr. WRITE—WeII, mistress, you should not have upbraide your husband in the manner you did, for you were the first to her!, this dreadful scene by upbraiding him. We ye all sorry for the. things, and generally when it is too late and this should teach to master our passions a little more. You must he detained present, until the result of this unfortunate buviness is known. Airs. Carter—l am tired of my life, and if I could have got w arsenic, 1 would have made away with myself. lam black over with the blows and kicks my husband gave me. Before Mn. Carter left the bar one of the four sovereigns vv given to her, and the remainder of the money was intrusted to Pate, the officer, to be given to her as occasion may require. Upon isquiry at the Infirmary yesterday afternoon, we loam: that very slight hopes are entertained of his recover►, _ . MERTMNS (IF CREDITORS, AT THE COURT OF eOIIIII.BTONTERS OF BANKRUPTS, BASIMOHAT.I.-ITRIET. THTS DAV. FIRST SIFI:TIWCS. e. Clarke, J. P. Gloucemer-house, Walworth, Surrey, sehoolmwe Fowler, M. Birmingham, grocer Langford, T. T. Lamb's Conduit.street, chinaman TO-MORROW. THIRD MEETINGS. Bridgman, J. Spicer-street, Bethnal-green, wholesale tallow. chandler Brown. J. New Crane, Shadwell, plumber Ford, W. Broadway, Blackfriars, wholesale teit-dealer Levin, W. L. East India-chambers, Leadenhall-street, met. chant ll Prondfoot, J. Queen-street, Cheanaidc, tallow-chandler to Wood, D. Alilk-street, Cheapside, woollen-warehouseman 11 SECOND MEETINGS. Davies, E. Walnut Tree.walk, Lambeth, engineer - 11 111`Alurdie, W. and Pout, W. C. Epping, Essex, stationers 11 Patterson, W. and Elliott, W. Basinghall-street, merchants II Peartnan, W. Etiston-street, Euston.square, musiesellcr 10 Ridley, W. Castle-street, Holborn, carpet-dealer . 11 Smith, J. 0. Iligh-oreet, Southwark, draper 11 Williams ' S. Finsbury-aquare, merchant 11 Wilson, 0. Constitution-row, Gray's Inn-road, working. jeweller FIRST IREETIVCIS. Baker, W. S. W. 11. Kennington-lane, Surrey, silk hat-ma nufacturer - - - II Baker, F. Child's-hill Pottery, Hendon, Middlesex, potter 11 Cowper, G. Oxford.street linen-draper - II Eiger, W. Castle -street, Holborn. coal-metehant . 10 Fenn, S. Bell-street, Edgeware-mad, flour-dealer . II Franklin, R. Wilmot-street, Brunswick-square,tailor . E Lewis, D. Lampeter Pontstephen, Cardigan. innkeeper it bevy, 1. Church.street, Minories, silversmith - 11 Lance Meld, J. Littlebourne, Kent, builder 12 Parminter, —, Earl-street. Blackfriars, coal-merchant II Peirpoint, Marian, late of the Cock and Bottle, Strand, sic. tualler - . 10 Pat, W. Union -street, Southwark, victualler . 12 Rawlings, B.Castle-street, Leicester-square, jeweller I'l Rownson, J. Mincing-lanr, merchant . II Rigg, T. B. Caroline-place, Chelsea, commission-agent E Smith, C. S. Camberwell, Surrey, draper 11 Smith, J. sera. and Smith, J. jute . Cateaton.street, warehouse. men . .- • . 12 Stevens, J. Pall-mall, hootmaker It . -.- Stocklei, R. and I;:icholas J. horse-shoe.wiserf, Upper Thames-street, coal-merchants . . 11 Trott, T. New Gloucester-street. Iloxton, builder . lil Wilkie, A. Duke -street, Portland-plate, upholsterer 11 Willmott, R. S. Paddington -street, builder . 11 , . DI VIDKNDS. Batt, E. Backahell, J. and Batt, A. W. Witney, Oxfordshire, . bankers . . H Blair, G. and Plimpton, W. Lower Thema-street, !birdmen 12 Blundell, M., 8., and S. liolborn.bridge, wholesale drapers Ii Colbeck, T. West-house, Fewston ; Ellie, W. Castlelield, Bingley ; Wilke. .I. Burley, Otley ; Holdsworth, W. Brad ford ; and lioldsworth, J. Morley, Batley, Yorkshire, flax. spinners - . - 13 Cullen, R. and Pears, J. Cheaptide, factors 12 • Davis, W. Lewisham. Kent, corn-dealer 12 - Harkness, J. Chapel-place, Long-lane, Southwark, drake:- merchant - - 12 Herbert, P. London, and late Muter of the Ship Thalia, and Herbert, J. late of Calcutta, merchants . 11 Hedge, J, Star-court. Little Compton-street, builder 12 Hilder, J. Lime-street, victualler - . 10 Hunter, J. Hawkhurot, Kent, corn-dealer 12 Landers, J Strand, hardwareman . II - .. Plaw. H. H. Richmeourt. Lime.atreet, merchant Seager, S. P. Maidstone, Kent, dealer Searle, H. Strand, bootmaker Scrivener, H. Ken . SetWenCl;H. jun. and Wilson, J. Kentish. buildings, Southwark, hop-factors II Stephenson, A. Glasgow, and Ingram-court, renchtsch street, L ondon, cotton-manufacturer . Stevens, W. H. Hedge -row, Islington. dealer in eathenrars I: PUBLIC HEALTM.—The Bill of Health of the metre. polis during the past month is of serious itnpertanN• From the returns of the burials under the four principal diseases with which it is generally affected, we extract the following :—There died during the five weeks of Octal:, by fever 108 ; by inflammation 205 ; by measles 116; and by casual small-pox 161. It appears that in all these the second week was the most fatal; a considerable abatement took place in the fourth week ; but in the last week, end. ing 3el November, a large increase ensued. REMARKABLE CURE BY VITAL. AlR.—The properti 6 of the Vital Air, as introduced by Doctor Thornton am the practice of p hysic, are but little known to the world , The following has been forwaided to us as an instance ei extraordinary cure performed by this salutary Gas:—The son of Mr. Boote, a surgeon and apothecary, residing au Bedford-row, had the )(Doping cough in so violent a degree that his strength was completely exhausted, and as what ever he ate came up, his recovery was judged i me osi,ible; hence recourse was had to Doctor Thornton 's advice. at time when there was no hope of success ; but by inhaling of the Vital Air, properly diluted, his appetite immcdiatelv returned, and he was enabled to take food—the rough abated, and he was speedily restored to perfect health. MARRIED. At Croydon, John Lewis Blackinore, Esq. of Upper Nemo street, to Amelia, youngest daughter of the late John flitctuah Esq. of Oarston.hall, Surrey. ()n Tuesday last, at Croydon, Stirrer, 3latthew Stent, jun. rf Ilarmondsworth. to Mary Ann, only daughter of Matthew New man, Esq. of Cromford, Middlesex. On the Bth Inst. at Dunham-Massey. Sir John Walsh. Ilsit. 0f Ifitrfieltl, Berkshire, to Lady Jane Grey, youngest daughter of th e Earl of Stamford and Warrington. DIED. On Tuesday last, Evan Foulkes. Esq. of 'Arvin's Inn_ l' Lately.. on his passage from Calcutta to England, aged 2g Tell' Samuel Nugent Legh, eldest non of the Rev. Legit Richm Hector of Terser, Bedfordshire. c, Primed at THE BRITISH PRESS Oflies, by J. W. eassolf 181, Straad, aad yublialted by B. Guratoar, aim Pb"' . Lk y • eat,/ br e, nd VP% • • lett e t -, an eat CO: ya k r, ow, rf • .1 Lade ' • 1 Ltd 1 A r al rtioc, I wit lake 3 eytry • Nig . 1 to p, LOo beak 2 40 Quit pot e win 7 , 1 2 yo f t,et 114;. rim tqa • M t • It e t !kt Ilya eta,. Iraq caya, net" *di • ; 1 3. 41 1 1 1 tkiri only 43 i aided b qrr these has xi at A t any .11 k ail I gat Pact, .1 UM: s, e. • 1 10 13 II 10 11 11 I 1 11 10 11 11 • 11 11 11 10 12 lu 11 12 11 12 12 11 12 12 13 It a . 11 19 11 11 11 1 12 It 2 1 • retro. ance• icipal I the °b p', ;and e the TOrDi ad• crtic; f in . d rorla. ce 1g cgrc , !bat- ibic; at a I aling