The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-04-08 00:00:00

=MMMI titge.,wb, 114 distress and misery of ► _ attended them? Why, the Gilt man who was sailed into the witness' boa adeoltt that thingh he bad been there, he was cueing 20s. aversak by his. labour aad the. Woad, was admitted the same thin, aad that be was in the reseipt of 175..a-weeke all the year mind. Allowing Ammer, that distress existed, could it be remedied by proceedings like those at Manchester? Wes, it Bitch!; that these men, by keels' their work foe the 411. 1 asset t return from Manchester to seek work pet, boils Was it likely that thew Mee who were sec prayed trDdrillieg and training, in starching and., erinateemarching. and also in committees, would he• i came rich and good citizens? He thought sot. Mal L-eareed fiend bad said, that the meeting at Mama beater was, at the time it was held. perfectly legal if hie Learned Friend meant that individuals sided moot *discuss their grievances. be perfectly agreed with him : but if he meant to _say that 100.000 Melo, or even 50,000. might be legally assembled MAO& each circumstances as were salculated to excite in the Minds of men possessed of property which they wished .to biomes* to their posterity, a jest and reasonable vetted of terror and alarm, thee be .would sap. that neither at that or any other period of the blowy of Ragland, weld sash a meeting be legally assembled. Howeeld ask them. then, as reasonable men. toed suck a meeting as this at Manchester. congregated as it bad Wee under assigns of insurrecßoa sad rebel • lief* headed by Henry Hunt. sow confined in Hamster • gaol. and. Richard Carlile, now residing in Dorchester Cies* P—Could each a meeting be considered as Sot likely to *auger the lives and properties of every individual is the neigh , eoarlsood? He asked them to reply by their verdict. aye, or no, to sash a question. .11a did not this!, it necessary to state to them the law -ate.oiech,a subject, because his Lordship would then tell Aim that the essence of the &retries laid down upon the gobjest by Mr. Justice Bayley. at York. wee. that whore.s meeting was put &netts, in such a manner .nadoeszaate terror sad alarm, it was decidedly an ll legal.eseeting.. If it was so ' was it to be allowed to remain ?.. Were there no legal means of bringing it that glom? Theisve of England hid been called. the pitleitionof resiseni but the perfection of reason weakhriso-brought to a pretty pass if then were so owns of stopping a meeting of 80,000 or 100,000 people... Weald the law be worth living under. if a loam like Heat could go where be liked, and at his will convene meetings, address then,, and direct their movements? He thought oo good niaa could wish to labour coder such A state of things. He should lay it. :down as the undoubted law of the land, that any magic. trate,,,constable, or private individual. might interpose between the country and each a eseetleg. They would see la the course of the evidence the pecnliar crisis at Webich the magistc• v of Manchester had formed their deterinioation to disperse this meeting. If they had sot formed sad executed that determination, he was cdascientionsly convinced that the town of Manchester world not have gervived that day. To calculate the effects °Touch a meeting, he would desire the Jug to der of what materials the meeting was form ed : it Mi meo In ?formation for several weeks; the whole populates withinl2 miles of Manchester lead been for some weeks arranging for a great day, and it was some thing marvellous that his Learned Friend, who had stated *be object of that- meeting to be parliamentary refcita, had eves scarcely endeavoured to prove it ; he bad said that it was convened for the purpose of deliber ating', but.by awl by it occurred to his e x cellent under s&ading, that deliberation at such an assembly was tithe nonseesical: bow indeed could it be otherwise, lAMPrifOi a word could be beard on such occasions more thaw ten yards beyond the hustings? As deliberation could not be their object, it most be evident that their 'gentle') was to show, that if they could not obtain re form in one way, they would attempt it in another. His tearned Peen(' bad promised to show the legality of the meeting anti bow had be dooe this? He might Have called 3,000 individuals (as Hnnt once threatened to do) to prove what be (Mr. Biackburne) bad proved; but he had contented himself with calling only two cot tnn.tp.inners. two statesmen, or at least two who had disguised themselves under that appearance, out of the 700 who had signed the requisition convening the meet ibg at Manchester, to take care of the combined interests of the whole nation. These individuals said they had signed a paper, bat it had not been produced; they said, however, that their object was Parliamentary Reform: that be would show not to have been thd case by a state meet of their real object. It had been stated bye witness 4 the name of Tyas, that Mr. Hunt had attended at Irnithfield, where. as was usual, lee was chairman ; he hall there proposed certain resolutions, one or two of 'vela eh he should now read, because they appeared to him as treasonable as any he had ever read. He week , show to them that this itinerant demagogue lad nt.i other view in Manchester than to forward the object of the meeting previously held in Smithfield—a nesting not only illegal, but was as nearly nable as-possible. He should produce a witness who bad veoeived these resolutions from the hands of Mr. Host: . ..the resolutions he would now read, and they apake for themselves. Learned Counsel here read the Smithfield resolations, and commented open them as be read them, bob the lateness of the hoer at which :the court rose, compels us to omit these comments, .which were chiefly levelled at Mr. Hunt and Mr. Car . Lie]. He then proceeded to say, that if a meeting were :held to carry each resolutions into effect, one of whish expressed a conditional allegiance to Government. it was palbably litrgal. How did he connect the pro. ceedings at Smithfield with those subsequently occur repg at Manchester? He would now explain. First of all, be would show them the placard calling the meeting of the 9th of August, which had been most diligently and assiduously circulated in Manchester soil its neighbourhood. This placard, calling upon the unrepresented inhabitants of that district to meet for the purpose of electing a person to represent them, and for adopting hie jor Cartwright's plan, the learned Sergeant then read. lie remarked, that amongst the . persons invited by this placard to attend, was -Sir Chivies Wellesley, who, by obtaining a seat for Hite. ..qtiogliam, had afterwards obtained a seat, a close it :_rptiglt. at Abiagdon, and that Mr. Wooler, who win siert emoog the invited persons, had now his residence . :lu..Warwick gaol. Now he would ask the jury whe tker it was more likely a meeting of such a descrip; gee could be held for deliberation, or for adopting ;inse m in contraception of the law? He would sew call their attention to the meeting bad been assembled in Manchester. His learned friend had said that they had come in b-auti fui order—he allowed it, but they would have come - is still more beautiful order, if they had been clothed ia regimentals. His learned friend bad also stated abet they had been trained—that appeared by 'heir r~~ __~ - . Y \ .. ~~~ r...__ ~~ . • THE STA' weidesee; Why bad tbey ee latift ea trained'? Wa s , a less alai decide ape'allygoutsmeasurer l se he had sot bees drilled during the night for emits weeks? No 8 it was not to enable them to de el4e better that they bad bees drilled—those drillings meresof the' use nature as those which raw recraite underwent is his Majesty's service. They were eat % pleated eight after sight in tuarelsiag and coaster s starching, Is wheeling is and oat of line, and in ilytl. ping their heads at the word " fire." That sandy, meld sot be aeciseary for the purpose ofisliberatlei. He would state another fact, which would prove that deliberation was not their object in these dallier. At a conga word they fell down, at another word they me agate. Now that was a light infantry mere-. moot ; aid for what purpose could It be practised by thee..mei, *alma, they contemplated a conflict at - w disks* pried pith regular troops ? It was also mask while toesseider whom these drillings took place; thy • +rental is the sight time, they began at dusk, and lastid instil dm morning. Two or three iadivideals.wbo bad vi sited them from curiosity, had been almost murdered by them; and he world show that at one of these drillligi, of which several were held, some at White tail's, some at Cockeramitic. others at Tesdes-bill, ReAfeid, the present plaintiff, had been present — sometimes as a commander of a squad, bometinies as a private. lie would likewise show, that hi bat been carrying a Bag is the Middleton division at the mo ment he received the sabre wound for which be now demanded reparation. The learned Sergeant then described the barbarous treatment which Murray and Shawcross, two of the Manchester police, bad received at Whitemoss, and stated that the party whom those individuals bad seen drilling. on passing Murray's house os the 16th of August, while repairing to Man chester, bad added insult to injury by halting, yelling, sod hissing before it. He then described the march of the reformers from that place by the Exchange, and the air of defiance with which Host bad stopped his cavalcade before it, to hiss the gentlemen engaged them on business. He likewise detailed the manner in which the column was halted before the Star lon, where the magistrates used to assemble, and the hoot jag which there took place. After statist; the man lier is which this division arrived at St. Peter's-field, after a circuitous route from Smedley-cottage. be pro ceeded to describe the military manner in which the other divisions took op their ground. He should prove that they marched to the field.. Mr. Shoals worth bad said that they had merely walked. la that person's Opinioi be would oppose the opinion at military men, who said that their stately organised step was that of regular troops. They had likewise mule. bugles, drum! and fifes, none of which were secessary to suist their deliberations. They had also beepers with inscriptions. His learned friend said there was nothing wrong in that ; that they were only used to distieguish the different townships from mit other. If that had been the feet, they would bare . simply put the name upon the banners ; whereas thdy had put_" Lees" eta. one aide, and ." CaragY ' death " on the other. Thew Shore was a Mark lag. A fat jolly looking man bad been called 'to prove that the flag was painted black, merely because he hap pened to have at that time no other kind of paint. But that statement he was sure the jury could Haw be induced to believe. The learned counsel then eel mented ou the impropriety of such au inscription 111 " Liberty or death," and said that it was intended to express insult, defiance, and hostility to the cornett. tuted authorities of the country. There was also the inscription, " Let us die like men, and not be told as slaves." Were the people of England, then, in that state of thraldom and misery, that it was better for them to seek death than to endure it? If not, was not such an inscription calculated to excite disaf fection, insurrection, and absolute rebellion? After condemning the inscription of " No corn laws" he proceeded to point out the revolationary tendency of the cape of liberty, which were paraded through the field with so much ostentation. and to call the attention of the jury to the " dagger," or " the piece of tin," as one of the witnesses had called it, which surmounted one of the Rigs. He thought that he bad now satisfied the jury that the meet ing was illegal : bat even supposing that it was sot so on account of the banners, he would ask then] whether, under all the circumstances, it was not so constituted as to strike tirrar into the inhabitants of Manchester? After eulogizing the conduct of the magistrates in very strong terms, and stating that it was absurd to suppose that they could wantonly, and withoto cause, lend themselves to acts and proceedings which had put in jeopardy the lives of his Majesty's subjects, he asked the jury, whether, under the impres sions which they had derive.; from the facts that came within their knowledge, the magistrates could have acted in any other way than they did? They were aware of all the facts which be bad de tailed. They knew that Mr. Hunt was not easily to be put off, and that, though he had seceded to the post ponement of one meeting, he had not abandoned his intention of disturbing the peace of their neie hbour hood. In consequence they left their homes, came to Manchester, and there consulted, day by a day, not bow their own property, but the property of the inhabitants of Manchester, and the tranquillity of the county, could best be preserved. Ths leatoed counsel, after some other statements of this nature, informed the jury that the magistrates, in pursuance'of their duty, hired Mr. Buxton's house, in order to be eye witnesses of the proceedings of the day. They left the Star inn at ten o'clock to repair thither. They found a cart placed in the middle of the square, which they naturally supposed was left there for the purpose of being used ea a hustings. Haring sworn in a num ber of special constables, they formed them in two lines for the purpose of keeping up -a free and uninter rupted communication between the cart and the house, after describing the military mode in which the differ-. est parties arriving on the ground took up then posi tion round the hustings, be asked whether such a cir cumstance passiag before the eyes of the magistrates 'was not calculated to excite their fears? It was tree that it did not alarm the fears of the plaiotifrs wit . ; but then it ought to be recollected, that with the exception of Mr. Stanley, they either participated it the transactions of the day, or entered strongly into the feelings of the parties there assembled. The inhabitants of Manchester, however, when they sae habdoza wellme alarmed obser ; w, the area completely jammed w i t h a discontented antics,papa for what meeting, as Mr. Stan leywas not' dangerous that wit headed by es it men as Mr. Wet sad Mr Ciente ? The assamonleation betties"' th • hsetiegs sat' the waggon redratised oyes Co , some time, but Is eemsequesee of its object being Anoka be state of therm inoWiishled, the wee:fon wet reason& add lbs Wee between its old and new poll 1111116 Ra nifty tea multitude. He eresld prose Mi. fact by Indisitetable testimony. lashed. there was no: one witness on "the part' of the plaintiff. except Mr. Stanley, who dared 'to state that there was an nnin tereepted- enntmunica lion between lir. Bnxton's house and the hustings. Ile would show for them. that there est as Interruption ceased by the locking of arms 6or 7 deep. It was not surprlsieg that the witnesses 'hostel speak of the peaceable demeanour of the meet ing before the arrival of the Yeomanry, bee ,ose at that time there was nobody to quarrel with 'emit themselves ; but the dancer was from the collection of so peat a man of elated persons. In defence of, the vigotoete mestasares taken by the Manchester eta gisteatea, be refiyret to the great mischief done by the mobs In 1780, which be ascribed to the przsillani- 1 ashy of Kennet, then Lord Mayor of London, who had neglected calling in the military to quell them. Fur that pusillanimity a criminal information had bees' filed against him, oo which he bad breve found guilty, sad severely fined. Ile also referred to the extreme danger to which the city of Loudon bad been ex posed, and the plunder and destruction which had taken place in it at the time of the Spafields meeting. in consermence of an observation that had been mode to the mob by an lessee individual. Now he would ask, had henna nature altered since that time ? If it had not. 'was it not likely that the same fatal results would have occurred at Manchester ? It ought to he recollected that it was a hot surnmer's day. in Which these men, with their wives and families, went to Manchester; and the exhume' Lion that their journey mad fatigue in standing would create, would have obliged them to have resorted to the alehouses for refreshment. Nmeolfter they bad been filled with the politics of Haan tliFitriigios et Carlile, and the porter of the alebonse, be would ask whether the lives of bii Majesty's subjects would not have been endangered by such a Danaher of individuals preparing to leave Manchester about, oine or tee o'clock at night? Would not such a circumstance have g ted universal dismay? And if it would, there was as end of the argument. The magistrates had as good a right to disperse sneh a Meeting as they had to alter any other kiwi of legal nuisance. Under these circurastanees the Magistrates thought 'themselves Bound tdcall in the aid of the military. They issued warrant to apprehend the leaders of the meeting. They pit it into the heeds of the emastables, who one and all of them declared that it was impractbsahle in them to estimate It. 'His Learned Friend hid' Aid that the civil power aught at least to have tried to execute it, which was in other words to say that two or three con stables ought to have been killed in an at to per form an impossibility. In consequence of the magis trates coinciding in opinion with the constables. a mes jag. was sent off to Captain Ilkley to 'deuce part of 'lsis troop to the fieltl,„ and to Cssiasel LtEstrange to bring out the Cheshire Yeomanry, and the 15th Hunan. During the interval betiveen their arrival on the held, and the despatching of the mess age, the Riot Act, as be would prove, was publicly read est of the window un der which the witness M.Kenna leas bleeding, and over which Mr. Stanley was lookin g at the crowd. It mattered not whether the public beard it, but read it wet. On the arrival of Major T Telford, the consta bles put the *arrant into his bat ids, and desired him to assist them in executing it. 11 e allowed that the cavalry reterned the cheers of the people before they set out for the hustings, and tie ma %mined their right to do so. They did sot, boweve t, proceed rapidly. He Would prove that they bad sere. t struck a blow till they bad arrived at the hustings; t hat they were am sailed by brickbats and stones, and t hat they wet with an almost issarmoustable resistance On their way to the hustings. it was not till they Ws ire attacked that they used forest, and then they had a right to defect themselves. It was his belief, derived from the testi mony which he would adduce. thit, but for the prompt. aid given by the 15th Hassan and the Ches hire Yea unary, the Manchester ieousant y would hare been utterly annihilated. Orders were therefore given to Col. L'Estrange to rescue them. 'The learner I counsel then pointed out the parts of the plaintiff's ,tvidence that seemed inconsistent with each other ; and' after- Wards proceeded to say, that it was not what re porters from London and elsewhere felt as to the daage.t to be apprehended from the meeting, that the jnry had to consider, bat the feelings of those who had pro,oerty at stake is Manchester. He had a few words to say regarding the m in which the trespass had been proved. It was only proved by one witness, who said that he saw Oliver strike him a blow on the shoulder. He did not say with what aide of the sabre, and there fore it did not follow that the wound of the plaintiff was caused by that blow. He must again submit to the jury that there was no evidence to affect thieper son. There was another part of this case upon which he mest address to them, and through them his lord ship, a few ob lions. lie meant this—that the defendants acted in obedience to a warrant from the magistrates; the resistance they experienced was in point of fact a resistance to that warrant, and if that were so, there was, as he should contend, an end to the whole of this case. If they acted without a war rant, though under the orders of constables, then the plaintiffs for an action fur damages should hays brought their case within six months after the occurrence. It was no answer to say that the parties contem plated redress fur a criminal wrong, aid that they bad brought this action last summer, the moment they felt that there was no chance of obtaining the redress which they sought. That excuse was uoayailing a.;ainst a protection secured to the public by a positive statute. lie should lay before them is evidence abundant proof of the case which he had stated for the defeadanst.— He knew that the Jury bad a weighty duty to perform. He admitted it was of the utmost importance that the, justice of the country should beadministerrd to the satis faction of the country; and in anticipating. their vet dict for his clients, he felt himself only asking what would satisfy the country and the justice of the sass. The Jury ought to feel that this qurstioc was, whether or not the laws and constitution of the e xrt este reountry were any longer to be permitted to exist— vhohe r who, in fact,eci exercised tile t y he w e e a r i e li t n o g, as be su it br w e e r r t e e . d o a f t will bi h manag ing meetings of this description. "It is for yon, gentlemen-of the jury." said the learned Sergeant, iu conclusion. "to say. se honest judges of the who'. case, whether that meeting at Manchester was cuni;r MN. tiled imam such elrentastanees, (I she 11 ut s e w bit 'ark more particularly to them,) as to e *Welt to the name of a legal meeting—whether its Iketun e w nes were such u to give it legitimate pr *wage if vim think so. then I have only to wain, I the phi of form la behalf of my carats ; bat if y Ist tidbit with me, that these banners, these flags, a Of this mot el were Indicative only oft movement far t' t m ums d revolution, then I most ask what curl hi en cm 1p arrive at, Lot that this was as illegal /Peeing, eat not one nasornhlod to promote a constrain' Sul pup s , y If ' you think that this meeting was called , for the amt Akre an that Just before held in Smitl field, aid that for which the placards were issued is tl.tly in ilmt. Amster, then the meeting was clearly Mess'. Tii real question, stripped of all form, was this —was was not that faradays( the 16th of Asp: let assenthitt under such circumstances as to e2daogt t the pawl, peace? Was it calculated to alarm the arising still. awaken the apprehension of the peareal k p,topie rte siding on the spot? If it had that effect. t the featlants' cue stood sustained; and if, la the In. taare of Mr. Stanley. a meetincconvened u oder the auspices of Ilr. Hut or Mr. nigh I b e d in caroms, then equally there was.aa end of t b e mi. 1 leave it in your hands, with a perfect 11 ,5,1 mr . ths: the verdict which will satisfy yourse. co, aid satisfy your country. The learned Sergeant concluded at half.p• p,l right o'clock.. anti the Court adjourned until ni it o'clock next day. THIRD DAY, SaTcanac. APRIL j. At nine o'clock this ntorninst, th.• nate.%r rf th e i mam were calks' over, and Mr. Justice Hintz ri o la " after entered the court. Mr. Serjeant Ilet.coca said, hi Ir. e l o )e or t wo re . marks to make to the jury, before l a p proceeded to Cla• mine his witnesses. which hr beg ega d pardon f ar havin .., f omitted the preceding evening. lie had hail „,,,c,ria th August. Some i n . s at t i t a e •ezt i e t d o :te e s lo t i e c e k t i s n which a w , e e sth of Au quirks hail been made on ,thi s subject, en d sh ay had been told that the people carried snuff r.tis, or little bits of sticks; such as wr re o rdinarily used in wa lki ng . New, be should he abl e to alsow that they armhole sticks; and that the people, on their march, carried them as soldiers did tlt fir hrelocks. lie would also prose. that the night before the 16th of Angus% gteat care ha 'been taken to clear •ne ground from stones and missiles of every descriptin n; but that after the merlin, tbe. place was strewe.: • rith stoups and sticks. Facts nth as these required n commen t. The examinatio a o f w i t far the d•feace then commenced. Tb.e first witness called was Mr. Jonathan Andrew, one of the constables of the taxis of Manchester on the 16th of August. lel9. The Other witnesses ex amined up to •.liree o'clock were, Isaac Dobson, a tn.- chine-maker 4 Mr. Robert Dean, a half-pay officer; John Tetiow, a •oraver; Abraham Mike, a wimulacturer; James lie-.p : Edmund ; James Murray; Robe. Kisser. Lisat.-Colonel of the Local lliiitia, a nd John Uhatieria. who was left under examination. • FROM SATURDAY .Y1.:11i"S OIZEITS. • 1a M[RVTSCtaa SUPSIECISCDZII. J. White, illetebingley, Surrey, farmer. I. Sheaf/aid, Ardwisis e pasisk4 Msochester i neselant. IL Holces, Tottenharn-court-rotid, linen-draper. BANKRITTS. J. Smethurst the elder. end R. Hindle, Torkingtoa,Clae shim calico-printers, to surrender April 23, 24, May Wm Use Bridgewater Arms-inn, Manchester. Attorneys, Bt. -2dge, Manchester; and Messrs. Milne and Parry, Temple. W. Watton. Liteh2eld, brewer,- Ayril 10, It, May 111„ at the Town-Hall, Nudeston. Warwickshire. Attorneys, Mr. Greenway, Attleborough-Hall, near Nuneaton; sad Messrs. Constable and Kirk, SymoniCs-inn,Cha teery4ane. S. Miles, Ludgate-Street. watch-maker, April 9. 20, May IS, at the Court of Commissioners. Attorneys, Mr. A.Res see end Mr. Jones, Great Ormond-street. F. Birmingham, Wellington brewery, Charles-street, City. road, common-brewer, April 13, 20. May la. at the Court of Commissioners. Attorney, Mr. Miter, 33, Castle-street. T. Sanders, Strarord-on-Avon, Warwickshire., eoel merchant, April IS, 27, May IS, at the Coart of Commis sioners. Attorneys, Messrs. Tyrol' and Son, Geildhsll-yard. H. Reynolds. Cheltenham, saddler, April 10, 22, May IF, at the Ram Inn, Gloucester. Attorneys, Messrs. wit Eras and White, Lincoln's-Inn; and Mr. Losesy, Cheltenham. W. Remade°, Leeds. victualler, April 2, 23. May 13, at the Court house, Leeds. Attorneys, Mr. Bettye, Chas cery-lane ; and Mr. Harp Leeds. Jr. Penton, Skipton, Yorkshire; innkeeper, April 23, 26, May 18, at the Black Horse lintel. 'Allston. Attorams, Mr. Beverley, 3,.Garden-court, Temple; and Mr. Aleock, Skipton. J. Friend, Bristol. maltster, April 19, 20, May IS, Lithe Commercial-rooms. Bristol. Attorneys, Messrs. Klee sad Lakin, 0, Gray's-loa-square ; and Messrs. Cary and Cross. Bristol. W. Hudson ' Ebenezer-place, Limehouse, shipowne r . April 13. May 4. IS, at •Basinghall-street. Attomet, Mr Seale. Covent-garden. J. Westlake. Moreton-hempstend, Devon, serge-maker. April 23, 24, May IS, at the Subscription Rooms, Exeter. Attorneys. Mr. Bretton. Broad-street, London; and Mr. Brnttnn, Castle-street, Exeter. J. Pitstow, Witham, Estes, miller. tpril 13. May 4, 12. at Basinghall-street. Attorneys, Mr. Wilson, King's- Banch-Walk, Temple ; and Mr. Andrew. Cogyie-ball. Fait?. J. Tomlinson. Bedfordbury, woollen-draper. Agri! 13. 23. May IS, at Basinzhall-street. Attorneys. Messrs. Nether sole, Barron. a..d Nether-role, Essex-street, Strand. W. Weleord. Tower-hill, merchant, April 9. 111. May at Basinghall-street. Attorneys, Messrs: Woodward, Our' ton. and Coombe. Tokenhouse.) aril. J. Steele, Liverpool. map and enart sealer. April Id, 20. May 18. at Basitizhatl-street. Attorney:4 Messrs. Smith 'led Weir, Ausin Friars. W. Tate, Cateaten-street. bookseller. April 9, 16. gar IS, at Basingball-street. Attorneys. Messrs. Cickieson lad tiedgrove, St. Swlthin's-lane, Lombard-street. f.:g TIT& rlCATta.—..tralL • J. Irvieg. juis. of Cartiste, grocer—E. PAM@ and L. Claude, Liverpool, merchants—W. Williams, 1. 1112 ! 5 "'" chambers, Fenchurch-street. merchant—W. Little, Meals pate. Cumberland, shire-merchant—T. Marais. ColtolM il ' - Staffordshire, miler—W. Peeks., Sloane-ware, per—M. per—M. and I'. hall, KMeston-upon-11011, woollen -drapers 1. Aytou, Newcastlempun-T ne. mercheet—W. stud binson, Worth i 4, eum man- carriers —J. Stanton. ter. coal-me-elisMt—J. Rasse:l-court, Mrery-laar, tavern-keeper. PARTNIIISHIPS 1:1111 4 0LTE'D. A. Black, T. Kingsbary, C. Parbtiry., and W. B. • loin, Leadenliall-street, booksellers—S. Weide and M: F: r Blske-tlev end T. U. 4Vhitfiele. Grevitle-street, [tattoo-garden. gentriwl age. - to-4 J. Rs) ta et ct and W. D. (Ash. Worcester, surgeons — E. Bries s . s.. and E. Briggs, jun. Leadenhall-street, drapers—T. rn.i". T. Watson, Lewis, dyers—W. and W. E. RAfe. Philir" P ' Addle-street, c.. rpe n te rs —B. Bevis and T. Claw, Ogle-street. Mary-la-bninc, varnish-makers—G. Young. 4. Lewis. nzni T. Lewis, Worcester, stationers—T. Roll. mad J. Chrst.ir-, Fritnley, Surrey. drapers—U. S. Phelps atat J. Beret . •••• Jewin-street. Cricple,late, tailors—K.' and O. Frend. A 3 terbUt'y, wi nenn erritant s —ll . Ashworth. I. and —J. InlJr. J. Whirls', Oldham, Lanacliiire, cotton -siisorr.4ll. 3. Eaton •31:1 D. Darby. Loitte%. Worcestershire, milers —s. Burton, R. clay, t.r1 , 1 S. smila. IN•von.h.re.greig• gate, printers—J. Smith and E. Rdmati. Roams, grayest [Dividends T.- 1 Leedom : Edited, Printed, sod Plibligiat at tem 0.1.,e.f "TaaßTATaac s!4 " and *THE CoNsmeettee"(S tta l Paper), No. f: kr7. Strand, by R. wAaocu. w *how all Cottolociestioot, Orders, dte. are enomeed be addressed. • r Jo "th Jo