The Statesman. — London, England, 1810-05-12 00:00:00

_... ,_ •:. . :co li c, the Seeakeie end '*erieant fingh,t to in ;that Hesse, and it was his duty to • state_ .r to theacticins hroughtaigainstelieM.HO Was his own opinion. Ho could state a number of. t'Oe that the question was of that kind which' cases where personecommitted fur contempt by one uerred unanimity in that Hnese - most desirable. Court had been brought up to another, when s l A •it was nut the duty : in any man, file such upon consideration of their cases, they had been e ,. .iou'onity, to sacri fi ce hkopiniolueitiChis con- . liberated. He should more particularly allude to S, lelleee He should not trouble thellouse at any , that case which contributed more than any , other length, beefiest, perhapi, ihe 'sentimente he had to the assertion and liberty of the subject in this twee might not be agreeable. It was not liN -country, ho meant the case of Penn. and Meade, intefoion togo into the various topics Whicbilltdr two Quakers, who had been triedrin the reign of I: 4 (; VC% syabli touched upuip by Msßight Hon. Friend i Charles 11. fur being present at an illegal assem. 01r. Ponsenby) I his night, and by his Ilun.Friend 1 bly, and were acquitted by the. Jury against the eir: Adam) ilea former debite. Both differed from I direction of the Judge, the well-known Judge y.. elle urtheir opinioni on this subject; and though he Jeffery. The whole of the Jury were committed tst. consideralijanself called upon On a former night for', contempt, in having acquitted the prisoners t . state his sentiment.' more et large, in order to contrary to the direction, and, as it was said. prevent that liouie.from coming to what be looked against the evidence. They were afterwards reon as a Wrong deiiiion, he did not think it tie- brought before Chief Justice Vaughan, who went t.essary on that occasion to plead the curie of par_ into a long and laboured argument to sliew that he Ise: litigating - a question with that House. The I had juradiction, and cited various cases in proof 1.« . ..e6i question was 'different ; and•if Ise was dis- i of it, particularly the case of a man committed posed not .to so 'into it, - be coati] truly affirm, it Iby Sir Nicholas Bacon for a contempt, who bad su;s: lint in consequence of the doctriues he bad i been released by the King's Bench, because the :beard advanced, ha becaoie the present state 1 commitment was for contempt generally, without of tin . business did nut call foe . it: He would 1 specifying the particular contempt. Therefore 'custifess, however..that he did not entertain thoopi- ! these analogies proved little for the argument in eioti that thePerivilegesof that House ought not to this case. But be was not desirous of saying, ' i...e brought into discussion in the Courts of Law: He much upon this 'occasion. Though he knew ,that 'would readily admit that the privileges of 'Par. any opinion of his was of littl e va l ue t o that lie'ecnt 'were a imit . of the law* of the lan4 and House, his opinion was of much value to himself. jsail been as sucterec4nize4 anti acted (lead in He knew that the privileges of that House were ,St:. l . Courts . 0 Law. 'He would admit that that given and maintained fur the ben e fi t ofthe p eo p le. Reese had power to - commit for' a breach of its Undoubtedly they were; hut if the time should r • . pr;vilegc , ois he bad before Stated e but he enter- ever come when the people, instead of thinking tained some doubts as to' the' existence or certain that they were used for their protection, should . 1. • legal rights, wh . iih had betel construed tia, flow believe they were exercised for their oppression, • from .this right' of commitment. As to the he must say, that he should consider that a most • question before the House, there was in appear. calamitous situation fur the House to be placed in. ' anee a desire that something. ihould be said as Mr. WINONA'S' observed, that though his to the knit of plea which should be put in. But Honourable Friend professed to uphold the pri he could Pot collect what plea was intended to be vileges of that House, yet the arguments he had set up, nor did he understand s the House to used in the latter part of his speech weut to sub ' have decided upon it. * lie conceived the objec. vent them. The general doctrine maintained bs , tion generally meant to be made against pro- ' his Honourable and Learned Friend would also reeding with the action to be, that the, Speaker subvert the privileges of all the minor jurisdic. and Serjeant, becaose they • ltad acted severally as a lions in the country. This was, the same as Speaker'and Officer of that H -use, in execution the doctrine held out in the Letters of Sir Francis of its order, could not be sued in an action con- Burdett, well suited to his auditors, but not siftently with the privileges of that House. To such as he thought his Honourable Friend would • him the possibility of inch a plea was not very entertain. This doctrine would go to establish an clear. He could easily see that the Speaker, act- infinite series of appeals—a system, which, 'on the . lug implicitly in conformity to the order of that authority of Dr. Paley, a writer often mentioned Rouse,,euiuld very consistently make use of such a of late io that House, could never be established. ' plea;. but he could not equally satisfy himself that There must be somewhere, iivevery nations a power 'the Serjeant at Arms could avail himself of the same without any confront, and it was not fair to argue, plea. As well as he could collect from such in- from its abuse in one instance, the necessity of formation as Gentlemen senerally had upon its total extinction. - The Right Hon. Gentleman such silbjeits, , the charge against the Serjeant thin proceeded to she* that the necessity or the nes not that, as an officer of that House, he had case required that a discretionary potter should be • acte'd by its authority, but 'that he haul executed lodged somewhere, and instanced the discretionary the warrant committed to hint in an unwarrantable power given to magistrates of every description Panner. Though the execution of the warrant throughout this country. lie had, at first, some simply may not b'.' coaniztible in a Omuta Law, doubts as to the propriety of the plea; but he eon without a violation (7f privilege, yet the manner fused that these had been in *great degree removed of e‘ectiting That warrant may. The warrant may by the speeches of his Right lion. Friend and the be legal, and yct tfie officer legally responsible fur Right Hon. Gentleman opposite. Ile thought the the mode of executing it; as there might be some Speaker might plead without compromising the doubts as to site legality of executing it in a particle. dignity of the House, looking upon that proceed tar mode. It did not appear to him how it could-be ing only as the mode of putting the Judge in pus. put on the record that he had acted as the officer session of the fact of the privilege of that House, ‘ ,#)f that douse, in bar of an action: foe what. he as toneected with this ease. had ulone in ejeceting its warrant, -He felt all The ATTORNEY GENERAL did Hot wish to detract that heel been urged in the tloct clime advanced tearwt.hibneutfsw when he a Ve ur d i t E m tici a n nv o e f a t s l u l e e is 1 which ur l s l that day, that the privileges of that ffonie could p the ablest Jtitiges of the Courts cif .Law allowed, that the t e s i r m iv i i d le ilo ge t s of Parliament g e a nt n ' , .w n e ‘ r . e .il i , t l b e n . z t i l e it i .i n r ieci jurisdiction , gtis s.elri: Dot be 4..estioned in the Courts rif Lite. But he would beg, of Gentlemen to remember what were all mistaken about their jurisdition; and he, therefore. the privileges •of the other House of Parliament . ; thought that the privileges of that House had been firmly re. to bear in mind that they were contending then . c h r ilea n te ei t i t e ., r l e a d w be of tii i r ie F a t- l ate : is 1 1 13 a to be th r e tZa " „ li cr Slsir which tlto- for the privileges •of another , branch of the Le- inas Jones, in the Cafe which had beer so often alluded to. he gisiature, which had no common feeling Or itiodersta i o , th ( e r aziptnions to he ent irely as to the form'of the common interest with the people , as much us ' ge e. a . 'comiZe detre'iticde,enli'utt t h at l ey i I c e o ra ace at i t v e e r ti o t r at t t i t le de ° Ple l a vi' l l it i l for their own. It was an extremely danger- not been put is its tile form of the law required. He could h t is i . it H the toutia o l u d r e ts ai a l iLc.awarneencluireriveenrd take • ous doctrine to maintain, that 'whatever was Samuel Itot arree vitit ni i lly) h done against the privileges of - either House of mm their consideration and judgment the euistrowe of ' the Parliament was to be arbitrarily punished, without privileges claimed by• the Mare. They were the only jsu,adsgchsinolirltellii are ‘ n m i l i r r t i s i • l il f e i gr t s l , v a to 1 I t i h t V i, r m il ;t a r ii t s it i .t m t , tir 3et tees appeal or lemal'itivestitation, beedinie the privileges of neither Ifeuse were to be questioned in a Court mast imve considered the lawin many cases 'where writs of of Law. lie would repeat that it was a most Ilobrol Corms have been moved fur the discharge of persons dangerous doctrine, and contrary to the - princi. t c r in u se ' in c li a. ' ses ed . i ' s c r i 4 i : l t B h t e inte P r - t Port a h li cause uf i Ct i ii e notitm of en t t ila w t a i s la n lu or se ' • pies .of British taw ; and in proof of this, lie the prisoner was remanded. Lord Chief Justice de Grey would suppose ass extreme case. He would sup. gave his opinion most decidedly to that effect.. If it were . . ti veil that the House did possess the pro/oleos which pose either House to Pass a resolution a man from .the etercise of a legal rights if that they had the right of' deciding on their privileges, and them decision must be final and conclmiv . e. It had beehi individual were to be arbitrarily Conimitted for thrown nut by many persons, anti also in the course of . ' acting upon 'a tight sanctioned by law, would this debate, that there was a considerable dierence Gentlemen think such an exercise of privilege was between the cases of the Speaker and of the Serjeant at perhaps Ars. be t expectthede e eT La t .:l l : e t- s oc u n i i d u .a ed y i s o om h e s t ti lg uls o , n it tb :i s o u ul i ! to be defended ? Yet, improbable as this case nal:, it was a case that actually had happened, and at ject. As to the form of the plea, he agreed, in a great mea- no very distant p er i o d, i n , the p ar li ame nt o r sere. with the opinions of this.a. n II!! tho ught the plea objected to by Sir I. meta Petit:kerma and Sir 'I . hos. Joneswas wrong, Ireland, now Cottstdidsted with the Parlia, as pleading to the jurisdiction of the Court of King's Bench. timid of this country. That Parlianamit. voted Hethought that pleas, by denying thejurisdiction.v..ere wrong, rely man who should demand or be - concerned in itlitssmi‘i,iree e ip)ro,i,eueleutb!eoinne,utitheril.'iseui.tetao .t 1 l w v h a ° s li t I t h i that I t u h r e i ll i e e ; . prosecuting 1 . suit far the recovery of tythes of should lee he t r a toe., • . • : '.• ,ti of the Court of Kings Bench, agistment, an enemy to his Country. Was such but that . it , shoald be g,., ~.:j A . plea in h har to thertion, as a Besolntron to be maintained as 'a privitege, when t ai n ie ,g i n n ) g e l a ,,l t ta f=i s ,"" i n i ",,. e .., ..%', e„rklntZ H ouse had it went directly , to deprive the subject of his legal I Low to a decision on a rinestton of p. ivileges. that decision, of the i cce s e e i r r e d t , n r a ncl ot t i l e s re iv , e o4t e tl a te im e , our h is o4 o e f v i t:r aW c . en l re n , :li t e hl c it m i e r, rights and undoubted property ? The CASC was an extreme one, and nut likely to occur again ; but he had exceeded the authority which the. Speaker's warrant it lia.l occurred once, anti might again in the it, gave him, lie did sot see how that case could be taken from t i k t e e j e u r r ti i i ld ni i c y t i 7. o t i o l f i ln n e ut C b ou e r a ts b o i f te L t a o w t he ti 7 . a t e o l l i s o; t i o t r o ni lL n i f y p l t ead t it. Nations of times and eirceresta n c es . If their p ri, • ileges were not to he discossod in Courts of Jas. serjeatot at Arms was an °dicer of that House, acting accord tice, bow did it happen that persons, committed ing to the warrant given to him i for it appeared that he e cerded the powers which that warrant gave him, and act= by the House were brought up on a vi tit of Habeas ed illegally, the Courts of Law might certaialy take colon- Corptis to the Courts of law, a hire the Judge wince of it. He thought it right, in the present stage of the ascertained the authority for commitment, ( I l i ! : ogvit i l ra w sai u d iut t t h l a is t s e tit e i , tr u e l t d d l s i l o t t et e ad ei n it ni . s l i o d u t l i t iv h e e r. ge d . . P Mr " Kr before he remanded the party ? What had metal proposition which he had heard so often, that in every been the opinion of Lord Kenyon himself, a woulda e l it e es iu t u h• t o b s e u p a re P e reme o w I :t o w t rie r r y u e i gi ed t : 9 = I C e i r fl 'a tu l r i e e l peer of the realm, when .he made a long argil_ for making general lairs - P hut so for particular cases, g he did went in his Court on the subject ? As to len shine that any hnuscl; of the Legisiatere, or even the Le what haul been slid respecting she unaloguies ;frac- Vtiptiel!, itself, r. As t a o a pri i v g il l e t ge to s, he k w e av an f d or i! t he a s k nXin la ta s tit 6l l; . lice of the Courts of Law in ennimitmetels for coo. all those ,privileges wnich could be clearly skean to have itumpts, he 'could see nothing in that. When it nehinged to the House it all times, and in the . br i st times; . a but ti l ( t n e te w o as f at oi n l a i s i l io t ris he . d w e e c r l e ara t t o iou e . l ot Hid n e e e a; anri.vetivefsesa.t li could yes stated that a person - in) p risulied for I Contempt coilld have no redress, he must' say; that if,: sorb forty to declare what they pleased to he their privi . 'l. , were Inc case, there would he an end of ell juiris- lege., there was no caleulatiog what mischief might be pro dtheuccidriebeyniasuicieth i r t i n iA i m de e rt uts of their privileges lii point of fact, lictiMil . His 'Right Ilimourable Friend -(M r. chosen by our um% estoti had voted PanSOilhy), fur w•huio opioion he haul the highest , themselves septennial ; and, if they could thus protract their . own existeace at their pleasure, and lay down a hat they Tel" ' I and ittuse honest, manly , and independent e CA. C , 9 . ~ public 4tattitiel "utitled hint to the gratitude of his Would renialn for the liberties of the country. ,eonintry; hid stated what hi would have done if • Lord MILTON said, that whatever plea would hold high ' sullener had'beo4 tlt an action egainit hint fur any est, the Privileges of the . Route (iv lietner in bar or in abate-, k arat), was the plea which he would most approve of. judicial act, if hiweeti - Cleincellnie When he con- . The question was then put, aid carried unanitiously. sidered the situation which kis aighe_Honseureble . Dlr. DAV IES at OP Y, after a few preliminary °Werra raditi had filled, he 'sliest' be iliapaied to defer beans, moved that the Attorney-General be_directed to defend ~ • the Speaker and the Sidi:tut at Arms against thitiactios.: ta `his i ' tipinou ; ... . , . .. . . . but 'they were la ' equalized ' This' idOtldti wields° carried saueueoasie. • i TifC . STAITS Y 1 API • ;' , Mr. WYNNE then said, that he wished to know whether in future it was to he generally understood, that any body might bring *edam of this sort against the House• witkont fear of its exercising the privilege of commitment ? A re cent ease had been determined in the House of Lords, upon a question of privilege, which be therefore considered non laves to the present. A Mr. Hesse, a Ju , tice of the Pence, had acted under the ilnesediate orders of that House, for the pUrpose of suppressing a ridt. An action at law had been brought against him for this conduct, but the Hoene of Lorde committed both the principal and his agent, alai wield not consent to release them until they gave Mr. Hesse a dis charge from his action. Ile wished to know whether the House was now to be understood as abandoning that course of proceeding. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that he was not then prepared to give an answer to the general question; but he would say, that in every particular .case, he thought the House was perfectly at liberty to exercise its owu discretion ' and in the exercise of his best discretion a nd judgment, he did not at present think that it was necessary to commit the Agent. Mr. WINDHAM began to speak, but was called to order, there being no question before the House. The House having resolved into a Committe of Supply, Mr. CHOKER moved, that a sum not exceeding 1,511001. be granted for Exiraorditiaries for the Navy. After a long discussion, in which Sir C. Pole, M - r. R. Ward. Captain Parker, Lord Cochrane, Mr. W. Pole, Ad miral Alackham, Alr. Whitbread, Mr. Croker, the Chancel lor of the Exchequer, and Mr. R. Ward repeatedly spoke, the Resolution was agreed to, and the report ordered to he received on Monday.—Adjourned at half past three o'clock to Monday. TRIUMPH OF WESTMINSTER, AND PORITY OF ELECTION. 'MIRE) ANNIVERSARY will be cc. 1 lebrated at the CROWN and ANCHOR TAVERN, in the STRAND, on W EDNESDAY, May 23, 1810. The Hon. Lord COCHRAN E, M. P. in the Chair. STRWARDS. ST. AKA E'S.—Messrs. Yarnold, Lunn, Lambert, Hutchin son. J•MEA . 3.—Messrs. Wimpory, Woodman, Collett, Starliag. Sr. ?MIL'S, COVENT CARMEN. and ST• MAKTILA.S-LE GILCAD.—Mers. Loehee, Beck, !Lamb:rid, Lees. ST. MARTlN'S.—Messrs. Wishart, Middleton, Inglett% Puller. ST. GEORGR l 3.—Messrs. Knight, Billeter, Taylor. Turner. ST. CLEMENT DANES and Si. MARY-LE-STRAND.— Messrs. Brooks, Starch, DANES, West, Sr. II A ROAR sr, and ST. JOHN.—Messrs. Slater, Staple ton, llodget , . Young. Tickets, Its. 6d. each, to be had at the Bar of the Tavern; and of hlr. Samuel Brooks, N. 110, Strand. Dinner on the Table at Five o'Clock precisely. J. W. BROOKS, Sec. TO THE PUBLIC. The Proprietor of this Paper having already replied to the vain boasting of the late Editor, and disproved his asser tions of being the sole Conductor of TIRE ST ATEIMIN, and his pretended fidelity of Reports, and grandeur of Waits, feels it incumbent to notice' some further assertions equally untrue, which it seems have been circulated with a view to excite the Compassion of certain individuals, (some of whom will shortly appear befyre the Public) and to induce them to assist him iii the formation of a plot, both unjust and Megal. The assertion now alluded to, is to the following effect, viz. " That he, the late Editor, had sacrificed his time in the service of TilE STATEIMAN, with out any remuneration." Now the fact is, that he has received upwards of Slx Hundred Pounds, for little more than a year's service, the latter part of which was remarkable only for gross Mismanagement, and deceit, ha not ottlyneglect sag the ordinary business of the Paper, but also admitting several Libation Articles, for two of which Prosecutions are actually commenced, others threatened, and one of the most flagrant nature against the Chief Justice of Inglatal narrowly escaped insertion. In answer to a Letter signed Z. from Leeds, received this morning, we find the paragraph alluded to was copied from a Morning Paper. The Letter from " An Englishman of the Old School" to Mr. WIIITBR EA n, shall appear on Monday, if possible. Arrived. ;)1 a I lb. 1 0 f Dublin 1 •0 1-........ Lisbon ... 0 • 1 ..v Malta PRICE tie sTi)(flis ruin I)A w AT ON Et/CLOCK. Iper Cent. Reduced, 691 •I 4 per Celli. 84 3 per Cent. Co mmis. 70* I 3 per Cent. Navy. lOU THE STATESMAN. / s_ MINDON : SATURDAY, MAY 12, 1810. At a late hour, we received Lisbon and 'Cadiz Papers. They state the following curious fact, in an article dated Almeida, April 15 : ` 4 Certain . intelligence has been received here, that a Uecree has arrived in Salamanca, by which all the French General' who command in Spain are infornwd, that Iney must nut expect any more money from France; but that they , must raise in Spain all the money they stand in tired of, for the subsistence of the troops, by contributions imposed on the Spaniards." It is also stated, that a large park of French artillery is arri►ed at Salamanca, supposed to be destined for operations against Portugal. • ALDERMAN Sir CUARLES PRICE Aar consented to call a Meeting of his Ward, the object of which is to induce the Common Council of Lon_ due to present a Petition to thelouse of Como mans, respecting the late proceedings. +111011.....- Tut Report of the Select Committee, a ppointed to search for Precedents in the singular cave of the proceedings of the House of Commons against Sir FRANCIS BURDETT, was last night brought up by Mr. 1). GIDDY. The first motion that was made by this organ of the Committee, Mr. D. Ginny, was,—That the Report do lie on the 'fable. We agree with Mr. GEORGE PONSONDY, who wittily said—the Report lying on the table was as indifferent to him as his hat lying there. This . Commit tee of precedent.seekers Say—" They 66 had found, on the Journals of the House, in •' numerous instances, that it was from the ear. liest times of Parliament the uniform usage and 46 practice of that House to commit to. enstqffy 44 persorli offending against the mithorky of that 44 House: That these preec.ulents contained the law of Parliament, ,and would prove that it had " been the constant course of practice, both in 46 this and the other House of Parliament, to ex. " erase this authority: but these precedents the 64 Committee begged leave to re, " Report." - Who denies that the nonce has mit pers9,ns offending soainst Who denies that the lio,use has ). - ":" alleges ? And „who will not maintain these • against any usurpation, at the haza r d o f hi s life ; There was a question, when the friends of user. pinion were at a loss how to get rid of inquiry into the Puke of YORK'S conduct—there wa s then a question, whether the military would not have put an end to the Inquiry with fixed bayo: I nets. What were then the feelings of the People of England—of that People so calumniated, s o basely belied at this moment ? They were reedy— ' to hazard their all, their lives, for the authority and privileges of the louse of Common and, we believe, it was the manifestation of this feeling of the Pcopt,e which put an end to, and put to silence, the then question of th e euntrouling the authority, powers, and privilege s of the House, or any of them, by the bayonet, It is not enough, therefore, for this select Coin. mittce, or any body else, to toll us that the Muse has been accustomed to commit persons offending against its authority. If the Committee had any thing to du at all, if its Report could he put out of the description of its being nu more than a hat lying on the table," it was quite necessary for them to skew, by precedents from the Journals, that. the House had the right to commit any person speaking of them, or writing of th em, anywhere. There is no question of the House having the right, as well as practibing th e custom, of' committing persons offending against the authority of the House. The question is, What its authority is ? and growing nut of that,, 'What is an offence against its authority? This is the question ; and the House might as welt hav e sent to the Temple for a Special Pleader to search their Journalsatlrewpobrotsetostuthffe:loronmseat,isser sent a Committee up stairs, of which they were composed) could bri ng oat nothing more' to the purpose than that R e p ort . What we'argue, what we have argued is this...A vague claim of authority, and a right of com. mittal for offence against that authority, the House difining, and being the sole judge of what 'it or if not offence,, is a claim to bare the right to be despotic, and necessarily leads to a despotism.--.. Ministers, or somebody for them, are more cunning than we were apprellensive of—since, if they succeed is this extraordinary seielle, and the people yield, they have made the Crown despotic, through the medium of the Commons House of Parlia. went. But to return to the Committee: they reserve the precedents on which they found their' wise conclusion...or to speak more cor. redly, their inconclusive conclusion. But why reserves It might have been as well to let the House somewhat into the secret of how the Cum. mittee came at their conclusion. Oh! but there was not time for that proceeding, however regular and desirable. The House are in a hurry, for two reasons—one of which is, that they have managed their special pleading, in such a manner, that they had not another day to deliberate in, without losing one of the pleas (no matter which) they might avail themselves of !—and the other, that they arc in haste to win in this question between them and the reopte ?.Well; we, at knit, have nothing to do with either part of this conduct, either the wisdom of the pleading, or the pru. deuce of the wish ! But thesCommittee (for we must harp upon that, like hamlet on Polortius's daughter, only- we are afraid Hamlet had a better taste than us) have found 0ut... 0 That there were instances in some reigns, and portico, larly in those of the _first and second Charles, where prosecutions had commenced by the Law Officeri of the crown, arid against Members of that House, for speeches spoken by them in Parliament ; but Ant the House of Commdus had always resisted such Prosecetions, as contrary to their.constitutional rights ; and this resistance el. timately led to the Bill of Rights itself." Why this finding out is the very blunder of MO Yeast himself. Hz found out a new consfrec. lion of the Bill of Rights ; for he dreamt, that what was intended as a security of the Bow against the Crown, against Members .being ques tioned in Courts of Law (or pretended Co urts of Law) for words spoken in Parliament, he dreamt that this was intended us security to Members against the opinion of the people, and the expressing of that opinion', any where, / 1 4 in any manner. These men of the Committee, its Alp the work hastily pot together, an't ly turned over to them have,broken a wa y part of its clumsy contrivances fnr conceal ment, l ha e s ic ti hing and laid open the whole of the question to and to every eye ! This debate, this business, or whatever yon call it, berries * on the mind to a thousand objeetiong to almost the whole, and every part of We can now touch only upon one topic more. Some' Members of that House predicted what the JUDGES would do! Nay, did um language that to common understandings would convey flue idea of intimidation towards the Judges! What then, are we come to? And who is to talk of treasons? We will not answe r that question, which (to borrow the pretty P h ra se of question, which reserve for another (to borrow Inc prviv some Member of tho House upon this memorable ti c o n e n ca ( s t iz r ) m ov ii e l ry schoolboy is his own playground z ' is been used to corn. 'its authorits LQN : Ptitard and Pothicsietl by . D. La to , as.b, at th e ---- 4\ l authority and prin ST•TIMIA7I OFltiCt 117. Flea-street , No, • r W" -- • 0 .. . .41.. ; ,3 ;o. 13 .04.•••••••••• N EWT, Tau Nachel t(llieFo' is ; ( )a We& rtnlE ri that ULS EN ived Tickets IV ines, irr N. IL e v o ,ans, uN number. _- -- r I_ ol' FNMA, ' At . & I 0 0 Wilt ScimlJ. kl Teti till 11 Ttil it . v a N the a:WV( Tided. `6400. of am% ICrH 12' CI Lo triiii.l tin' 1 1' Tlte tin in ally LUIS best Iris F 3 ` fdlly like It I% All 0 turrptim e.f Fr. molt for Wm. A N' cc °redo PEAS Can oeti lattlio,z imatviac To p roion seturit. Addi Bead-4 T'pE 11.00%111 et' tla Ladi ttuppli legiaL; A o!nts. Wahl Invi Li any p c(10.1 4;h7ai: nity a VOaV Pei awl T aid C I'l I:vre abov view wilt TI S:tri sear Fib rllli 4 Bat ii ‘ sire vie itho' c3l) fa( nrt pit. e; de 'go th CR 1