The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-06-10 00:00:00

b. • ,• . I Y I • . t s • Fl i t _ 17 , 1 AGRICULTURAL comsurrE E. -.1P.-- SECOND REPORT. POST PRINTXII ST 05551 Of TUX HOCSt OP COSIIIONX. The SILECT Csmistrtaa to whom the (teport of the 'Nth day of June, 1821, together with the several Pe titions which base been presented to the House in the last and present Sessions of Parliament complaining of the depressed State of Agriculture of the United • Kingdom. were referred, to inquire into the allege tions thereof, and to report their observations there upon, from time to time to the House. Proceed to lay before the House, the evidence which they have taken, upon the subject of storing foreign grain in warehouses. under the Kings lock; with re gard to which, peat apprehensions are expressed by' several of the petiticners, who conceive that some game ities of that grain have been, and that much larger quantities may lie surreptitiously taken out, and brought into the supply of the home market, contrary to law. some particular cases 'mine been stated, in which fraods of this description were alleged to have been prac tised, your Committee applied their immediate attention to the consideration of them ; and the result of this in 'vestigatiens leads them to lodise', that generally speak. ing, the'precautions and checks which are observed sod applied, under the Act, Ist an; 2 , 1 of his present Ma jecY, c. 87, to the warehousing of foreign grain, are so effectual, and so regularly enforced, as to remove all suspicion as to the market having been at ail affected by a f-audulent supply obtained by any such undue prac tices ; hot the instance which happroed at Bridlington, detailed in the Appendix No. 1, chews that a tosetant and vigilant superinteodance on the part of the custom . .." house officers, is essentially necessary for the purpose of securing the public against the clandestine subtraction of small quantities of verb grain by the proprietors, froni warehouses not well adapted to the purpose, or not duly and frequently surveyed. • It should be judged expedient to restrict tits ware housing of foreign grain to some few of the most aloud- Avralile porta, instead of allowing it, as the law now stands, to be deposited in any part of Or. tusked king dom, each irregularities as these would probably be prevented in future. The ease of the wheat supposed to have been withdrawn from the warehouses at Olasgow appeared to rest upon inch authentic testimony, that it is fit to lay the whole subject before the house as a proof how necessary it is to evamine accurately into any transactiose of this 'awe, and to be cautious in giving credit to them until they have been fully investigated. So far, therefore, as con cerns the present system of warehousing foreign corn, tour Consittee have nothing further to suggest by way of precaution: but by the evidence of Mr. Charles Wel stead, (collector for the coast business inwards and out wards) tud Mr. Thos biorris (one of the Surveyors- tirueral of the (. s ustoms) it appears that there is a possi bility of introducing foreign corn into vessels carrying , So the trade coastwise, particularly from Ireland, as it is not the practice to :ether into or out of the vessel, but to rely upon the 'ileclaration of the of the vessel, sod the ordi ' Airy evoke% 'vbft h not examined with atten-1 Ilan. The mode in which any such fraud can be cam-, mitted must be by the British or Irish vessel either touch isgalandestinely at some foreign port, and taking in a quantity of corn to mix with the declared cargo (such declaration specifying a less quantity than is actually taken on board) or by meeting some foreign vessel at sea, and taking in a supply there, without touching et sty port. Such a process in either C&JO would unques• tiosably be attended with many difficulties; and from the Dumber of persons on board who must nee aaaaa ily be ac quainted with the fraud, must be extremely liable to de tection ; bet as it is represented to be not absolutely im practicable, your Committee deem it a sols'ect which de serves the *staffers of the most conve Ottretepart seat of thqfsptoms, to devise same -more eitithetory 'security igainst it. The only other object which has engaged-the atten tion of your Committee relates to a proposed alteration in the distillery laws, as calculated to afford a probable extension of the consumption of barley, in case the sug gestions contained in the evidence of Messrs. Dunlop and upon that head, should be carried into ef fect ; but your Committee are well aware that the trade of the English distillers, as well as that of the brewers, and the interest of very extensive branches of the reve nue, are so directly implicated is this question, that it cannot be considered with refereoce to the benefit of agriculture alone.—May 21), 1822. EITENTS tre AID.—A case fame on in the Court of Exchequer on Saturday last, Hornblower r. Hill and Co., when some circumstances were disclosed relative to the influence which the Extent in Aid System has bad in producing the present distress in Staffordshire. M . Hill and Co., Hankers at Steurbridge, obtain ed an Extent in Aid against the plaintiff, an Iron master in Staffordelaire, for 5,0001. and upwards, and be was afterwards made a bankrupt, whereby upwards of 2.000 work people were thrown one of employment. Many other Iron= sssss in Staffordshire were driven into the Gazette, to prevent the same proceedings from the same quarter against them, the consequence of all which is that many thousands of workmen are now unemployed. How long shall such things take place under a law, which we are told by Judges and Lawyers is the very perfection of reason ? We are as tonished that a power of this kind, which eau only be used for purposes of oppression, and the defrauding of just creditors, has sot been done sway with long ago. Is the s • one whit less safe in Scotland where no such power exists? Boxese.—Hyblett challenges to fight Bishop Sharp, front M. to 1001. or any other pugilist of his weight in Ectland. which is I 1 atone. Tl‘e battle between Oliver and Abbot, at present, is rather doubtful ; bet Abbot has promised to make the ma- Dry good to-ino, row—if so. the fight will he on Wed n slay. The above battles will be within 20 wiles of Lo•oion. RIOT IN THII FLU'? Parsoft.—Friday afternoon, Bar- Ler, the Sheriff's Officer, and his assistants, proceeded to the Fleet Prison to levy an execution on the goods of a man of the name of Edgar, confined there for debt. The nature of their errand being made known to the prison ers, they commenced an attack, and in the affray Barber lost his hat, and was relieved of the akirts of his coat, sod his attendants were not treated with lees ceremony; mad bad it not Seen for the timely interference of the Warden, they would have been dragged to the pump. Several of the ring-leaders are identified, and will be proceeded against. Marten/as ran, Joss B.—An inquest was held on Tuesday morning on the body of a buy named Lee. On one of the late race days, his mother bid him do something which be refused. This refusal irritated her to such a degree, that site struck him with a knife which she had ill her band, and wounded bin, in the thigh. He was immediately taken to the infirmary, and his woasd dressed I bus a sturtifioation emitted, and he died es Saturday. The agony and remorse of the mother' has since been extreme. She was per mitted, antler the care of a police officer, to attend the funeral of her son, an Tuesday afternoon, and was uitli difficulty removed from the grave.—A verdict of MastiLinghter was gifts against he.. .4.••••• 5 LAO' INTRLLIGRAVCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WIIWIIIINt JUNI 8 Tut oleo 0. wADDINGTom. The defendant was brought up in the custody of the Keeper of Newer/me, to plead to au information for pub fishing a libel on the Christian religion. Mr. Justice Berlin only was in Court, the other Judges sot having taken their seats. On being required to plead by the officer,Ttedilington addressed Mr. Justice Bayley with a relit-moat complaint of the treatment which he bad received in petioo. His friends, be said, had been denied omega to him, and he had. in every respect, bee* treated like a common Moo n' therefore implied to .the Court that the Keeper of Newgate might be directed, to admit his friends and pe . les fissional adviseri who presented. themselves for adults sion. tle also requested that the Coort would grant him subpoenas to enforce the attendance of certain wit nesses on his trial, and would allow him a copy of the information filed against him. Mr. Justice Barber informed the defendant, that if he had soy gentled of complaint, and would bring it before the Court on affidavit, they would readily hear him ; but it was contrary to -uniform practice to attend to any application unless supported by oath. The Coort bad no power to order the subpmna which he asked for, bat the proper course was to apply to the Attorney-Oe ' send, who, if he saw just ground, might grant them as metier of favour. To a copy of the informationke was entitled of right, and might obtain it by apprieeties to • proper officers. The itefendaat was then required to plead. Nut re fused, stilt complaining of injustice. Mr. Justice SATI.ot directed him to be remanded for a week, that he might ronsider of the course be would pursue, and be left the Court in custody. Tux KING C. liscrog. This application was made to the Court by Mr. Hap also e, in the course of last term, for a criminal infer• nation against the defendant, who is steward to Mr. Jolliffe, a gentleman who holds considerable property. and necessarily of great influence in the borough of Po tersfield. Mr. SCARLCTT showed cause against this role, whit.% bad, be said. been obtained on the affidavit of a respect able solicitor, named Atchesee, who charged Mr. Mu tor with having committed I misdemeanours. It would bare been more desirable bad these charges as sumed a more speci fi c shape, and condescended - upon more defined particulars—then they could have been better answered. The real fact was, that Mr. Atcheson, who was a man of property also. had taken up his coma try residence at Petertheld, and done various acts to de monstrate the interest he was disposed to take in the affairs of the borough. Now the misvemeanours which the defendant had committed were merely a feeling el pressive of his determination to prefer the interest a/ his own patron and friend to that of Mr. Atchesoo, to the borough. The affidavit charged Mr. Hector with summoning jurors, and appointing a returning officer for elections of Mayor of the borough, with the view of forwavling the canvassing purposesof Mr. Jolliffe. Now he (kir. Scarlett) challenged his Learned Friends to point eat a single fact to justify the criminal imputa tions levelled at Mr. Hector. On the face of the era ceeding there were certainly no grounds for sutaintag a criminal information. Mr. HARRISON. in reply, contended that the affidavits filed is Court detailed sufficient matter to support the corrupt inference ascribed to Mr. Hector, and to show that he selected the jurors for party purposes, and to promote the election of Mr. Joni& as Mayor of the bo rough. The ultimate object was elearly electioneerietr. and the exclusion of particular sad very respectable persons, sufficiently established the motives whit mufti tlaajfewkao4.47-7;.:Zos I w nawer to qneations from tbe Court, Mr. Wale sOM said that this affidavit did not deny that the object of his clients was also to promote party in the borough. It was silent upon that head, and he believed their motives were pore. The Cover said, that as other questions were involved is the present, they would postpone delivering their opinion upon the rule until the first day of next term. I The Court rose at fire o'clock. ARCHES COURT—SATuaDAT, J.:mg S. GILL V. GILL. Ie a former stage of this cause, we reported (on the 15th of February last) the Judge's recommenda tion to Alr. Gill to receive his wife back into bis fa mily. and the Court's persuasion of Mrs. Gill's entire innocence. The cause, our readers may remember, was originally one of restitution of conjugal rights, brought by Mrs. Gill against ber husband; to which he pleadad her alleged adultery in bar. On the se cond Session of Easter Term, the Judge gave seetence in this matter, earnestly recommending the heaband to endeavour to divest his miod of these unforteuate suspicions. The Court was called upon to inform him, that the law would not countenance them, but would enforce his cohabitation with his wife; I. protect whom he was equally bound, not only by the laws of his country, but by every- moral feeling and every reli gions duty. In this spirit the Court pronounced its ti 4 erre, auizning the husband to take his nife home. to treat her with conjugal kindness, and to certify that he had done so, next term. This day, the Proctor for Mrs. Gill informed the Court, that its recommendation bad not been complied oith ; and Mr. Gi:l not having appeared to the de cree for the payment of alimony to his wife, the Court waa prayed to pronounce him in contempt. Nu s;l l .6cieut excuse for Mr. Gill's non-appearance being offered by his preeror, The Court pronounced him contumacious. soil di rected its sentence to be signified in the usual manner. As to the other part of the prayer, which regarded Mr. Gill's nut having received his wife beck, the Court directed the cuorideration of that to stand over (jr a COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, Juts S. HUNT V. BILL. This was action for libel, brought by the proprietor of the Tennis Court, in Windmill-street, against the Editor of a Sunday Paper, and the Jury found a verdict it► fa vour of the latter. Mr. Serjeaot Bosaxiaurr Ibis day inured fur a new trial on the ground that sparring was not illegal. The Judges refused the application, Icing unanimously of opinion that the bunted Cuter JUSTICE had laid down the law correctly, stating sparring to by illegal. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MAR.RIAOE. MATTHEWS V. REYNOLDS. Mr. Sergeant PULL said, this was an action brought by the plaintiff, who was a widow, certainly not in the bloom of youth, but not in a very advanced abb of life, against the defendant, who was. at least. ten years older than herself, for a breach of promise of marriage. The defendant had acted as executor, on till death of the plaintiff's husband, which happened in ISIS. Front that period, to the year 100, he had been constant in his attention. and bad conducted himself with that pro. prier, and friendship, so as to insure the confidence of 4'lol"‘,A.o' .oker. STATCSMAN. the plaiside. The friendship was carried on, and on the 6tb of August. led, a marriage madmen', between the parties, was draws up, and executed. Lodging. were taken. in an agreeable situation, and furniture bought, wins. sil on a sudden, without any reason Aging assigveil, the defendant discontinued his visits, fitted the widow now sought that compensation which the law alone afforded. He should not have an oppor tsmity of again addressing the Jury, because lie uoder lened there would not be any witnesses called for the de is/teat; sad, if he might be allowed to anticipate the Node of defence that woulsi be attempted, it would, in his opinion, be only ridicule. The Jary, however, he was persuaded, would sot allow themselves to be divert. ed from the facts that he was about to lay before them, ISM would give those damages which the nature of the, 011111. .Sarah Pratt said she lived at Lower Claptoe. In June, 1621, Mr.. Mathews and Mr. Itevriolds came to her house to look at some lodgings, and during the time they were examining them. she heard Mrs Mathews um, " the room was too small," sod Mr. Reynolds re. " what this room will not hold tee can put in the next. Mrs. Mathews appeared about 45, and Mr. Rey seith ten years older. Air. Reynolds visited Mrs. Ma this every Sunday for a considerable length of time, until October, and then he did not come so frequently, and discontineed altogether on the ISth of that month. Cross-exawiord by Ale. Sergeant VA UGH %N.—She said the lady had beeo.lodging with b since. Witness sever was present at the interviews when the defendant visited her lodger. She did not know that the defend ast bad an arm that was penalised; had heard that be was something in, the earpeNter line. Thomas Williams said he was clerk to the plaintiff's httorney, and was a witness to the deed of settlement which he bad in his band, and saw the defendant exp. cute it. Mr. Mathews had lived in Church-row in a respectable way of life. 'l'be deed was put in and read. It appeared all the property was secured upon the widow. Ideation was made in it of :?ti houses in the neigilibourboA of Mile end. George Arendt said he had knew* the plaintiff 13 or 14 years: her husband had been dead seven years. The defendant had acted as executor since her husband's death. On the kith November witness was present at a conversation between the parties. Mr. Reynolds, on coming into the plaintiff's room, asked her " if she had taken tea," to which she answered in the affirmative, and observed, " that he bad been so long absent, that he had become a stranger, and that be had behaved to her very strangely of late ;" to which he said, "be could not help it ;" she said " be appeared to have altered hie i nteatioos ; and he replied " he had altered his mind for the present, and that he should not come to see her any more." She said " great expence bad been incurred, she having bought a carpet and other things to furnish the house . He answered. " the expence could not be very great, as she might give up the lodging at Christmas . ' She ad verted to the marriage settlement having been agreed to by him, and he thought be had no right to pay any thing towards it. Cross-examined.—Never beard the defendant bad hie right arm paralized. The plaintiff now owed witness , SO/., part of which was contracted is her husband's lib and part since; mould not swear that the defendant bad the use of his right arm. Mr. Sergeant VAL'OIIAN, for the defendant, said his surprise was certainly very great at a case brought in the way like the present: Parties so far advanced in Sib were not likely to stiffer that injury which might have attended an earlier period. If there had been the bloom of beauty on the cheek of a young lady, likely to fade by the neglect, cruel neglect, of a false-hearted youth, there might be some degree of commiseration, and damages might have been justly required. Instead hf that there is a widow. admitted-to. he 45 at least, s 'Main fill 10 year, older-wide a poweette any, whoa the is dragging into a mart of justice for compensa tion, because If you will not, when you may. When you will, you shall bare nay;" Of the expression " that he had altered his mind," cer tainly did not imply an entire foreskins of the lady. However, she is determined it should be so, and thus pursues her dear old man. Perhaps, she was herself anxious to be rid of the bargain, and sought, eagerly. for the first opportunity, when she could break off the affair. lie felt persuaded that, if the Jury should be sa tisfied there had been a promise, and a breach of that promise. they wonld certainly conclude there could not be any damages, for no injury bad been sustained. The Lord Chief Justice DALLAS thought there bad been a promise, and a breach of that promise. The Jury would consider the evidence which bad been before thew, and would give such a compensation as they cow ceivcil the party entitled to. There could not have bees an injury to the feelings of the party complaining, nel ther could there have been an intention on the part elf, the defendant to secure to himself the property of las plaintiff They would have soberly and temperately to think what the widow bad lost by losing a man 10 years older than herself. Verdict for the Plaintiff.—Damages 501. SECONDARIES' OFFICE, Juss 8. LANZ V. SID:VAT AND 1101111111. A Jury was icapannelled to assess damages in this action, which was entered against Sir .1. Sidney, the Sheriff of the county of Kent, and Mr. Morris,a sheriff's oflit.er, the latter having arrested and falsely impri soned the plaintiff. Mr. Drinecuass was for the plaintiff ; and from the wit he called, it appeared that the plaintiff, Miss Elizabeth Lake, and her three sisters, kept a school at Deptford. An execution had been issued against Miss Marianne Lake, and Morris went to the house to arrest the young lady. He, however, laid his hand upon the plaintiff, and notwithstanding the repeated assertions of the family that she was not the person named in the execution, took her off to a lockup house, where she was detained until next morning. Mr. Aveneuve, for the defence, stated, that no ma lice was imputable to his client, who bad committed the error withoutany intention, and would have been hal.)e for the 4ebt and costs if he bad allowed a de fendant to escape from his custody. The SitONUART summed up, and the Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 2.51. s. POLICE. OCILDUALL.—gaiTTACK OP AN 11)10T ON HIS linariga.—On Sul:6l.day, Thomas Hackie Prior, a mi serable-looking as-attire. about 16 years of age. was char i red with baring desperately wounded Elizabeth Mania. Ann . Shelton stated, that fur the last fort night she slept with Elisalieth Martin, in a room or copied by the latter, in the hone No. 10, Cock-lane, Smithfield. The prisoner slept In another bed in the same room; at eleven o'clock on Friday night they all went to bed ; between One and two the witness was awoke by Elisabeth Martha crying out. " Tom. what are Jun abatis—what are you doing." There was a lamp in the room, and witness saw the prisoner •itauding by the side of the bed, whiels was lying on the door, aid holding Eliz. Martin's arm; she saw no lilt knife in his h a nd, h i t was certa i n b e meant sod instantly r a n d ews s t a i rs , opene d I'm street and cried oat " murder." and called the watch, A watchman soon came; witness told him if be did sot go op stairs immediately. -eerier would be committed ; he refused till he got anti h r watchman to go with him. Witness then went up stairs with them. On enteri ng the room, she saw the !limner standing over Martin's bed with a knife in his hand ; the prisoner did n o t speak; the watchmen took the knife from him ; Eli:. Martin and the be were covered nith blood; she said to the prisoner. "for God's sake, Tom, have merry on me ; 1 know I am murdered, and will die soon :" Several persons soon came into the room ; tbe prisoner was taken to the tratehouse, and Elisabeth Martin to the hospital. Thomas Quinlan, the watchman wbo answered the call of the first witness, corroborated her statement of the far.- after lie was called. On going into the room where the prig met wan, the witness cried out to him, '• Yoa villain, put down the knife;" hut the prisoner took no notice of it. Witness then struck him sew. cal times on the arm, but be still held thaltnife,srbirb the witness at length c.iught hold of llrd teitiled from him. Elizabeth Martin was in a dreadful state, all over covered with blood. She called for a doctor, and said she should soon die. Witness took the prisoner to the a atzh-house. Win. Bachelor, the second watt►mss, stated, that when the knife was taken from the prisoner, he (1h witness) went for a surgeon. lie afterwards o mato the watch-boner, u here lie asked the p.isaa r what %s had killed the woman fur; he said, •' the Devil toll me." Claytos, the landlord of the house is which Martin and the pri lodged, stated test about six months ago he let the room they occupied to the prisoner's mother, who was in service. She employed blartin to take care of the prisoner. Wit. sees bad but little opportunity uf observing the pri. aoaer's conduct, but considered him (orphan, and ea. &Wood he bad lucid intervals, and sometimes worked. The prisoner lately said, be had dreamed that he Ishould certainly die on the 21st of the present mouth, and was sure It would come to pass, Witness lived in the house adjoining that in which Martin sad the prisoner lodged, and being awoke by the noise of cellist( the watchman, he followed them into the room, where he saw E.izabeth olarin in such a state, that he was certain at the time she must soon bleed to death. There was a cut on the back uf her neck, Into which be could thrust his hand: there were also severe cots on her arm, chest, and other parts of her person. When she saw the witness, she said to him, •• My dear Mr. Clayton. why did you not come sooner? I'll soon die." Mr. Amesbury, a tarpon, and several other persona, came into the room soon after. Elizabeth Martin was takes to the hospital, and the prisoner to the watch-house. Witness asked the prisoner at the wateb-boose, by he bad killed Mrs. Martin ? His only reply was, 'beta a cap o■ my head." Ihe wretched prisoner stood at the bar while this evidence was given, apparently wholly regardless of every thing that was passing around him—his whole appearance expressi►e of a state of melancholy idiot ism. It was stated that he was so very deaf as not to hear the evidence, and the Magistrate caused him to be asked, in a maser which it was evident he did bear. why be had eat the woman in the dreadful as set he had dune? The question was repeatedly asked, bat his answers were quite incoherent. In reply to the several repetitions of the question, he said," She put a cap on my head—she left a mug and knife on the table—l drank the beer-1 heard a noise at the door, and thought they were cowing up to put meto death. I dreamed 1 died and came to life again, aad that a minister told me I was the son of Doti. and would hare a crown of glory-1 have no more to sly ?" A certificate from Mr. Curtis, the house surgeon of St. Bartholomew's Hospital was read, which stated, that Elizabeth Martin had several severe wounds nu different parts of her body, particularly one at the back of her neck; and that she must be considered in a very dangerous state." No person belonging to the unfortunate prisoner appeared at the ohne. He was remanded to be brought up again when further evidence could be produced re specting his state of mind, and the fate of the poor woman should be known. DIARY FOR VIM PRESENT WEEK: WIFN TOE TIMES OW MOM WATER £T lASDOE•IIID4t. Jane 9, 14.—Fattsr Sunnis . AFTEt Tara*. High water—morn. 47 m. aft. 4; even. 6 m. aft. 4. 10, M.-Batorn rises 4 m. aft.! morn. High water—morn. 103 m. after 5 ; eves. 47 m. after S. 11, T.-Br. B•RNAB As. High water—morn. 8 at. after 6 ►even. SI m e after 6. t?, Lisa Qt. AR. AT 4 ATT. High water—morn. 65 la. after 6; even. 20 at. art. 7. 13, Tb.—Cloek slow SO see. High water--morn. 4; m. after 7; even. 10 st. after 8. 14, F.—Mars sets 1.2 m. aft. 12 morn. High water—moro. 48 is. after 8; even. f 3 ea. after 9. 15, 8.-Bue rises 44 in aft. 2. High water—moni. S 7 m. after 0; even SS al. after 10: Test WEtrucn.—Tbe weather has continued, all this week, eninterrnptedly fine, and been aceempamied with a degree of beat ninth higher than usual at this seasonal the year. The effect of this has been remarkable in ac celerating regetati .n; villa the brisk breezes that here blown every dsy have couoteracted the innervating . is flnenoe of the halt on the animal frame, The Wind , indeed, last night, fest cool or everivld ; the thermOmeter mlicAting a fall Of 10 degrees of temperature, compared with that of some of the preceding nosier. &road, June S. I. Juno 3. M.. 4,T.... Th..., 7, F.... IF SSSSS OSETCII. , II Weise*. s'etoek. at night. 64 73 75 61 EPJ C 4 78 66 76 63 73 64 73 L : 0 1 841 , 2 2 8 0 ! ; s o l i; OS .23 , Fair OS . ,94 , Fair ! Ili Al j Fair 1 OS AI Fair .rr 'Fair DIED. On Saturday the Ist inst., la the 40th year orb" Ir. after a shirt but very severe illness, Elisabeth Blasellerd. eldest daughter of the late Joseph Blandford, of the laser Temple, E.g. On Wm.!!.G at i r l a i d y 7 R l ec as t t o . r a o t t S s o o o rth riumbr hend. Elizta xsarL ifs 01 the •_ . London: Edited. Printed. and PaliMal at the 01IWO " Tux ST ATIMIAN" and " lie COMITITV11011" (IfCIF Paper.) No. itn, Strand, by R. WARMELL. LLB. to . comoualoattow, Onions, to. alle gl i q ualsl4 I° I be addressed. i • I AKI. - . ~~1 y. ~. .. MIR