The Statesman. — London, England, 1812-05-23 00:00:00

IMPERI.II, PARLIAMENT. If II I , 111 ; ) t t 110 USE OF 1.0111)S, mAy 22. The Irish Prol r,*riaitintrits: !till paused Off/M . :II a Commit tee, with sonic amendments moved by (ht. Arrnt.isaop of Cashel. Report nn Siiutity. The He% .nt's anal Bid, ar.d some teSer 11;11s. were brought op from the Common , by Al'. Manning, Mr. Lamington, P. '.'more, 31111 irtOet' Members, and 'r .41 a hist time. Mr. Hill, f r om .he Treasury, pre,eated an Act:twat of the lilt of I:,e Proven v Inv, for the years endiii4 the sth Jan. ISIO. Ist t, and Isl.2.—Ordered to lie on tln• A lon,- discussion to sk place upon the Repro: of a Welch In t-la• e,. bill, to which Earl Stanhope , made !q.v.:7:A rol'..jections.— II is inorikaip's ivnenilia Ins were negatived on three divisions, and the Report was agreed to. TENANTRY V.`% I) PEASANTRY OF IRELAND. Fad ST NIIO PE (the !loose not sitting next Friday) pro posetto posi.pone the commitment of his Bill relative to the Teutin•ry had Peasantry of Ireland tint Nlond:q se'uoight, hut on the :suggestion of fire Duke of Ncrltilk, that taue was a grand cerenmay to take idle:. on that day (the Installation of the Knights of tV Bath his Lordship proposed Wednesllav se'nnight; and the Order for sunimoning the Lords for Friday next was discharged, and renewed for Wednesday s t 'imight.—Adjourned till Monday. TIOUSF , OF COMMONS. On Use motion for the third reading of the Cambridge and Eishap Stortroal Canal Bill, Mr. C. ADAMS mod that it be real a ;bird time this day BIN months. On t.iis<pestion, after some conversation, the House divided. Fur the poqi , :onement, ';:t4—Agninst. it, °3.—Majority in fa * soar of the Hi,l, 65. T.te Bill was then read a third time and ADDRESS TO THE PRINCE REGENT. Mr. STUART OitT LEY appeared at the 'kir, and stated, that in pumance of the Order oldie House ' he and Lord Mil ton. the Sec. o :4 the Niiitioa, had waited oti the Prince He at day, and had communicated to him the Address of Coe noose of Ycsievlay, to which his Riyal Highness had been plnsed to return tins most gra,imis anivcr:--" I shall take into my serious :Led immediatecunsideration the Address of the House of Commons." CORRi: SPON HENCE BETWEEN SIR JAMES CRAIG AND HENRY. Mr. WHITBREAD w ished to know, whether it was the fixed determination of the Noble Lord opposite (Castlereagh) to re sist the Motion of which he had g iven notice for the producti o n of the Correspoudeuce between Sir James Craig atm Henry, or nut ? Lord CA 4 4II.EREAGII ;aid, it sarely would be `ns wish to d resist its production. ORDERS IN COUNCIL, AND BERLIN AND MILAN DECREES. Mr. BROUGHAM said, perceiving a Bight lion. Gentleman, the President of the Board of Trade, in his place, he rose to make a motion which he pre sumed would not he opposed. lie begged leave at the same time to put a question to a Noble Lord op posite, on a point which he conceived to be of pri mary twcessity, and to which he presumed the Noble Lord would not refuse on answer, for the satisfac tion of that House and of the country A circum stance had lately transpired, affecting in a material degree, in the of many, the Declara tion published about six or eight weeks ago by this Government, in which it is stated that the Orders in Council shall be understood to be ipso facto annulled, as soon as an official communication shall have been received of the unqualified and unconditional repeal of the Berlin and Milan Decrees. After some weeks had elapsed, in a manner, he confessed, unintelligi ble to him who was unacquainted with the diplomacy of the French Court, a Decree had made kis appear ance, of a pretty old date, which, indeed, but for its date, might seem to be an answer 'to that very Declaration of this Government. It must seem, in deed, surprising how completely they had anticipated the terms of that Declaration. This Decree, how ever, dated in April, 1811, did contain a revocation of the Berlin and Milan Decrees; and our Declara tion did else bear, that our ()triers in Council were' to be discontinued from the period of the repeal of the Jilerliti and Milan Decrees. The latter did, no I doubt, contemplate a subsequent repeal; but still this was clearly within the spirit, though not within! the words of the Declaration, and it would only require a Gazette Proclathation, to set things to rights. It was clearly ° not au object of considers,. tion, when the Berlin and Milan Decrees were re voked, hut only that an official, unqualified, and unconditional revocation of them should take place. Then the next question was, whether the Decree, which was stated to have been lately communicated to this Government, was such an unqualified and un couditiotial repeal of the enemy's Decrees as made our Declaration attach to the effect of repealing our Orders in Council ?—[llear, hear! from the Minis terial side.] -Was he to understand, then, that it did not so attach ? The repeal of the French Decrees, it appeared, was confined to America; was this, however, to he held as sufficient to prevent our De claration from taking effect? This was what he wish ed to know from the Noble Lord:—lle heartily wished the Noble Lord's answer might he such as the House and the country wished :—That was, that it might import compliance with the expectation now exdressed by him ; but, if this should not fortunately be the case, still there was a necessity for some fur ther step being taken on the part of the Government of this country. lie meant that a publication of the annulment of those Orders in Council would become necessary.. if this was not done, then must every ; individual case come into a Prize Court, or into a ; Court of Law, and the parties be exposed to a harass ing and expensive litigation. It was with the view I of entreating to take this into consideration, and to rectify the Declaration, that he now brought the sub- I ject under consideration. With this view he begged to ask of the Noble Lord; Ist, If to his conception I of the French Decree, the date was of consequence? 2dly, If he agreed that this act of the French Go- 1 vet-unseat was'esteemed enough, so as to operate as a repeal of our Orders in Council ? 3dly, If bath of these iMints were at an end, then he begged to sag ° gest that it should not be left to speculation wiat the nature of the Declaration was meant to be ; but that an explanation should be published on that sub- I . ject. Mt. B. concluded by moving for . an Account of the expence of Clothing for the Army/ and Ma. rifles for the ten years, ending Jan. 5, 1812, distin gaits ring each yehr. Mr. ROSE had no objection to the Motion. lard CASTLEFLEAGII complained, that the Han. and Learned Gentleman had brought forward his questions rather in an augmentative sort of shape. fifth, I no difficulty, however, in stating, what was his opinion as to each. It was no doubt true, that been communicated to the Government of y, within these two days, a Decree of the Yernment to the effect stated by the Hon. , .rued Gentleman, dated 15 months ago. The at of this countrpreteived this communi-. surprise; because they knew that the Government had applied for more 'explicit on this head to the French Government, TIIE STATESMAN and, till lately, when the Di;cree in question was for the continuance of the Orders in Council, and produced, had not rec eived all y satisfactory essur- being answered in the negative, ho gave notice that :ewes. The Hon. anti Learned Gentleman had pro - he should move for the attendance of several. fused not to be acquainted with French Diplomacy, Mr. MARRYATT said, that the ship-ownees of of which, there could not be ti doubt, the Decree in Landon who had petitioned the House would be ex estion wattlie offspriei; now first , : seen after amined. had been passed,"asits Idate bore,' 15 months, and The 'Order of the Day was then read, and the after the prii mn lgation 'of {he Declaration . .by this. Mese resolved itself into the Committee on the Or country. The Decree in question, however, was 1 ders in Council, and Mr. Aspinal was called in and not an iniceeditional repeal of the French Decrees, I examined. . but was pointedly confined to America. Now, if the Honourable and Learned Gentleman asked him, if such a Decree, so extraordinary and unique in its kind, satisfied him that we ought to re peal our Orders in Council, he had no hesita tion in saving, that, in his opinion, such a De cree in no degree satisfied his Majesty's Declaration, 'which was framed not to apply to one nation as to whom, for a hostile and sinister purpose, the French Government might repeal their Decrees, but only in the event of a general 'and unconditional repeal of those Decrees. The Decree now alluded to, only went to a partial and conditional repeal of the Ber lin and Milan Decrees, and now wade its appear ance under circumstances the most disgraceful to the i Government whence it proceeded; and if any one i act could convince. America of fraud having been l • practised by France, both against this country and against America, he (Lord Castlereagh) should con ceive this curious and pretended document would ! hive that effect, which was now brought forward with Ale expectation of seducing this country into a repeal of her Orders in Council. As• to the in strument itself, however, it did not satisfy the ! terms of the Declaration issued by the Govern- I ment of this country. If what he (Lord Castlereagh) had stated on this subject, however, was not satis ! factory,, the Declaration gave to any person entar,,. taining a contrary opinion their remedy - at law. Mr. BROUGHAM begged to be understood atil only repeating what he had orignally meant to ex-, press, that if there %as not a clerical error in the date of the document in question, it must - be consi dered as one of those acts which are most unworthy iof a Great Nation. As to the condition, however, on which the Declaration bore that the Orders in iCouncil were to be repealed, he once more implored that it might be reconsidered, and submitted, that though not in the words, yet in the spirit of their Declaration, the Government of this country were now warranted in repealing the Orders in Council as to America. The French Decrees boing repealed' as to the Americans, this was, as to them, the same as if there was a repeal of those Decrees, generally. Mr. ROSE said a few words. • Mr. STEPHEN disapproved of the premature manner in which the matter had been brought for.l ward. The paper alluded to seemed to hits to be singularly disgraceful to the Government by whom it was issued ' • but he was surprised that his Honour. able and Learned Friend should, in the present state of affairs, have been so anxious to draw from his Majesty's present Ministers, their opinions on the subject of the effect had by that paper on the Declara tion by this country. Did he do so, from an im- ' pression that those measures which he (Mr. Brougham) so strenuously supported, would not be so much in favour as he could wish with that Government which was yet unborn ? Mr. BARING regretted, that the Noble • Lord (Castlereagh) should have expressed any decided opinion on so important a point as the policy of con tinuing the Orders in Council, so far as America was concerned, pending the evidence now in the course of proceeding at the Bar of that House, and before there had been time for weighing the importance of that evidence in all its bearings. Lord CASTLEREAGH said, he had given no opinion as to the policy of continuing the Orders iu Council, as far as regarded America. He had only answered some questions put to him on matters of fact. Mr. BARING explained. When the motion was put and agreed to. Mr. BROUGHAM also moved for an Account of the Expence of Swords and Bayonets for the Navy and Army, for the ten years ending sth Jan. 1812, distinguishing each year.—Ordered. Mr. MARTIN, on the suggestion of Lord Cas tlereagh. postponed the Committees on the Registrar of the Admiralty's Bill, and on the Exchequer Re membrancer's Bill, till Friday next. SUPPLY. Lord CASTLEREAGH felt that there might seem to be an impropriety in calling on the Ilouse to vote away public money in the absence of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. But as to a grant, the principle of which had been already assented to by the Ilouse, he meant the grant to the children of Mr. Perceval, which had been unanimously approved of by the House, he th ought there could be no diffi:culty. He should move, therefore, that the Houseelo go into a Committee of Supply, for the purpose of votingthat special grant only. The House accordingly went into a Committee of Supply. Lord CASTLEREAGH moved that the House at its rising should adjourn until Monday. Mr. BROUGHAM called the attention of the House to the inconvenience that would result to the Country, bat more particularly to the witnesses, by any unnecessary delay. He wished that the House should sit to-morrow, that the examinations on the subject of the Orders in Council might be continued. Mr. STEPHEN replied, that the Honour able Member had no right to expect that the conve nience of Members should lie sacrificed; he having occupied one whole day in the examination of wit. nesses from Spitalfields, whose attendatice could have been procured at any time. ; . After a few words frotn Mr. Rose and Lord Cas- 1 tlertagh, the latter. withdrew his .'notion, and 4he question of the Adjournment of the House watt post poned. A Committee to arilange and. digest the Iligfiwar Reports. was appointed, on the motion of Mr. D. GIDDY. After some unimportant conversation, an Account was ordered to be laid before the House of the num ber of Crates of Earthenware sent to Liverpool' from the Potteries of Staffordshire for the years 1803 and 1811. Mr. BARING enquired if it were the intentien, of the other side of the House to call any of the ahip owners of Sunderland or Shields, who had petitioned LIST of Ike MAJORITY and MINORITY ON MR. STUART WORTLEY'S MOTION FOR AN ADDRESS TO THE PRINCE REGENT, TO FORE AN EFFICIENT ADMINISTRATION. MAJORITY. Abercrombie, Ho. J.Grattan, Rt. Ho. H. Ossulston, Lord Adair, R. Greenough, G. B. Parnell, 11. Agar, E. F. Grenfell, P. Perin, li. Anstruther, Sir J. Grosvenor, Gen. Pelham, lion. C. Antonie, W. I. Hamilton, Lord A. Pelham, lion. G. Althorpe, Vise. Harvey, E. Piggott, Sir A. Bagenal, W. Hibbert, O. Prendergast, M. Barham, J. F. Hippisley, Sir J. C. Pochin, C. Baring. A. Horner, F. Pollingtoo, Vise. Bess icke, C. Howard, H. Ponsonby, Rt. Hon. Bennett, Hon. H. Howard, Hon. W. George Biddulph, R. M. Howortb, H. Ponsonby, Hen. G. Binning, Lord Hughes, W. L. Ponsonby, Hon. F. Blachford, B. P. Huskisson, W. Pouthien, J. de , Bourne, W. S. Hussey, T. Power, R. Bouverie, lion. B. Hutchinson, Hon. C.Poyntz, W. S. Brand, Hon. T. Jackson, J. Prittie, Hun. F. Browne, A. Jacob, W. Pym, E. Buller, -Sir E. Jekyll, Jos. Quin, Hon. W. Burdett, Sir F. Knight, R. Ridley, Sir M. Burrell, Hon: R. D.Knuic, Hon. T. Romilly, Sir S. Buske, W. Lamb, Hon. W. Saville. A. Calcraft, J. Lambton, R. J. Sebright, Sir I. Canning, Milton. G.Langton, W. G. Sharpe, R. Canning, G. , Latouche, R. Shipley, W. Cavendish, Lord G. Leach, J. Sinclair, G. Cavendish, 11. Leigh, R. H. Smith, G. Chaloner, R. Lemon, Sir W. Smith, J. . Cockerel!, Sir C. Lemon, J. Smith, A. Cocks, J. Lemon, C. Smith, W. Coke, T. W. Lester, B. L. Somerville, Sir M. Coke, E. Lloyd, J. M. Staniforth, J. Colborne, R. W. K. Lloyd, Sir E. Stanley, Lord Combe, H. C. Lyttleton, Hon. H. Stewart, J. Cotes, J. Macdonald, James swan, H. Cuthbert, J. R. Madocks, W. A. Talbot, R. W. Daly, Rt. Hon, D. B.Mariin, H. Tarleton, B. Dent, .1. Martin, ti. Tavistpck, Marq, of Dickinson, W. Mathew, Hon. M. Taylor, W. Dillon, lion. H. A. Moult, lion. W. Taylor, M. A. Drummond, H. Meade, Hon. J. Templeton, N. Duncannon, Vise. Mezborough, EarlofTemple, Earl Dundas, Hon. L. Mildmay, Sir H. Tierney, Rt. lion. G. Eden, Hon. G. Miller, Sir T. Tighe, W. " Ellis, C. R. Milton, Viscount Tracy, C. H. Ferguson, R. C. Montgomery, Sir H. Tremayne, J. H. Fitzgerald, Rt. 11. M. Moore. P. Trench. F. . Fitzgerald, Lord H. Houck ,, Sir C. Vanderheyden, D. Fitzpatrick,Rt H.R.Morpetb, Viscount Vernon, G. G. V. ' Fitzroy, Lord W. hltistyn ' Sir T. Walpole, Hon. G. Foley, J. Myers. T. Ward, Hon. T. W. Folkes, Sir M. Neville, Hon. R. Warrender, Sir O. • Folkestone, VisconntNewport,Right Hon. Wharton, T. Forbes, Viscount Sir J. Whitbread, S. • Frankland, W. North, D. Williams, Sir R. Freemantle, W. 11. Northey, W. Wortley, J. A. S. • Giles, D. Nugent, Lord Wynne, Sir W. W; Gordon, W. O'Hara, C. • Wynne, C. W. Gower, Earl Ord, W. Wrottesley, H. Gower, Lord G. L. Osborne, Lord F. . • ;•.‘'l.(ke i ' ' 1 I , I t . , I II: 1 t fl 1 : 1 r 1 I . If t : i [I I I .. 11l . t - , ',l ; i; i i t " i '' ,l ' 1 , 1 1 , .1 0 , l'i 1 - , , 1 l i I. [. f i f.• there had he thi% country 1, French Govt T ' I( 1 and Learned Goya! , men' cation with , • American C 1 iptormation . . ..: ~`.l. it • ... ~ ... . ' li MINOftITY. Adams, C. Ferguson, J. Muncaster,, Lord Allan, A. Fitzgerald. W. Murray, Sir J. Arbuthnot, Rt. Hon. Forrester, C. Nichol], Sir J. C. Foster, on. T. Noel, G. N. Attersol, French, A. Nor ou Hon. Gen, Babington, T. Gell, P. Odell, W .• Bagwell, W. Gibbs, Sir V. Owen, John Badlie G. Giddy, D. Paget , Hon. E. Baker, J. Gipps, G. Palk, Sir L. Barry, J. Gooch, T. S. . Peel, Sir ft, Beresford, Lord G. Gonliwnn, H. Peel, R. Beresford, J. P. Grant, C. Phipps, Hon. E. Benyon, R. Grant, Right Hon. Plomer, Sir T. Bernard Viscount Sir W. Pole, Sir C. Blackburne, J. Graham, J. Pole, W. W. Bootle. E. W. Graham, S. Porcher, J. D. Bouverie, C. 1 1 . Hall , B. Porter, G. Bowyer, Sir G. Hume, J. Rai mer, J. Bradshaw, Hon. A. Hamilton, Hans Rattislottom J. C. Headly, ord Robinson, lion. F. Brodrick, Hon. W. Herbert, H. A. • Rochfort ' G. Brogrfen, J. Hill, Sir G. F. Rose, G. H. 1 Brooke, Lord Hobhouse, B. Ryder, Rt. lion. R. Browne, I. H. Hodson, J. - Scott, Rt. Hon.SirW. Bruce, J. Holmes, W. Seymour, Lord R. Burghersh, Lord *Houblon, J. A. Sitawe, Sir J. Burton, T. . Houston, A. Sheldon, R. Calvert, J. Howard, lion. F.G. Simeon, J. Campbell, Gen. A. Huntingfield, Lord Singleton, M. Campbell. A. Jenkinson, Hon. C. Sloane, W. Carew, Right Hon. Jenkinson. C. Smith, T. A. R. J. Jocelyn, Lord Smith, J. Castlereagh, Vis. Joddrel, H. Sneyd, R. Cholmondlev, J. Jones, G. Somerset, Lord A. Clerk, Sir G. Keene, W. Stewart, Sir,J. Clive, H. King, Sir J. D. Sullivan, Rt. Hou. J. Cloinnell, Earl of Kingston, J. Stunner, G. H. i Cochrane, Hon. G. Laseelles, Hon. E. Shiffner, Cooper, E. Synge Laseelles ' Hon. H. St. Asaph. Lord Cottrell, Sir I. Lefkwre, C. S. Thomas, G. W. Courtenay. J. P. Leigh, J. H. Thornton, S. Crickitt, R. A. Leycester, H. Thornton, H. Croker, J. W. Loftus, Gen. Thornton, R. Curtis, Sir W. Long, tt. Hon. C. Thynne, Lord J. Davies, R. H.. Longfivld, M. Townshend, Hon. W. Dawkins, .1. I,ovaine, Lord Tyrw hitt, Sir T. Desart, Earl of Lowther, Viscount Vansittart, G. Disbrowe, E. Luttrell, 3. F. Vereker. Col. Duckett, G. t.ushington, S. R. Wallace, Rt. Ha. T. Duigenan, Dr. P. l.ygon, Hon. W. Walpole. Lord Hondas, Rt. Tin. W. Maitland, J. Ward, R. Duftrin, Lord Manning, W. Wedderburn, Sir D. 4erton, J. Marryatt, .1. Wemyss, %V. Eliot, lion. W. Mellish, W. %%harm, R. Elice, W. Milner, It. P. Wilberforce, W...,- Ellison, R. Moreton, Hon. E. William', It. jun. Estcourt, T. Montague, M. Wood, T. , Eyre, A. H. Moore, Lord H. Yorke, Rt. Hon. C: Farqohar, J. Moorsom, Adm. Sittings appointed in Middlesex and London, be fore the Right Honourable EDWARD Lord I.IILET4- BOROUGH, Lord Chief Justice, &c. in and after Trinity Term, 1812: — IN TERM. Wednesday June S Moniay Monday • l5 LONDON. Thursday June 4 Thursday Tuesday . . . 10 Thursii ; , . I:t . FT .. I E 6 R I TERM. I.TceuSi.—Mr RAYMOND'S benefit is announced for Monday next, we sincerely wish him a bumper. Mr. RAYMOND, as. an actor, is highly respectable ; and for his abilities as stage Manager of the Lyceum, we only need to take a retrospect of the Pieces lately brought forwerd on this stage, which, in con- 1 of talent, dramatic selection, cast of cha racter, and correctness of performance, stands nn % A .. vailed by any other Theatre in the kingdom. 'Mrs. Ltr s Ntt, Oster to the Right lion. RICHARD ! BRINSILEY SMI:DID4N, will, on Monday, submit to poldic inspect' her popular and interesting Come dy, The Sons of Erin ; or, Modern Sentiment :" 1 which has aiready run near twenty nights at the Ly -1 ceum Theatre with unbounded applause ! Mr. RIDG -1 WAY, who purthased the copy-right of Pizarro and The School for Scandal, &c. &c. we understand, is . to be the publisher. ~ LOVELL v. GOLOSMITO Mr. Lovrtx. being precluded from attcedieg the Court of King's Bench when the above Trial came on, i nitabie to form an opinion ou what ground the verdict wAF. given for the De. fondant. He hos, therefore, bespoke a IttTort of the Trial at • full length from a Snort-hand Writer of emi!ience, who was in Court during the whole proceedings, which.will be pub lished in the STAIESSIAN on Monday or Tuesday nett, when the P. , blic, as well as himself, will be enahled to Firma cor rect judgment as to this extraordinary busbies,. GOVERNMENT STATE LOTTERY OFFICE, CORN HILL. j OAKES, Stock-Broker, respectfully begs leave 1.7 • to thank the Nobility and ?Abet)! the preferearegiven to the above Office in the Lottery just finished. The Capital Prizes he had the pleasure to distribute are now prising_on demand ; and Shares in the 'A EW LIT ILE LOT-, TERY, to lie drawn the Ith of Next Month, selling i n as great variety as the limited number orrickets u ill allow, or exchang ed for Prizes on this or ether Offices to ail) amount. It io hard ly necessary to recommend an early nuerliase at this Govern ment State Lottery Office, when the Public are acquainted that there are only 8,010 Tickets, yet a gre ion' variety of Capital Prizes than have been submitted to sale in former Lotteries of Twenty-five Thousand Tickets. Government Securites to any amount ; Cann!. Dock, Water works, Bridge, and other Shares trou4lit and sold by Corma4- 6ioll. N. B. At 8, Cornhill (exclusive' vj the Public enjoy the pri vilege of perw , iug all,Newspapers and Periodical Works. Arr. Mails. Due. Dublin Waterford 4 Cadiz Lisbon Guernsey ... Jersey PRICE OF STOCKS THIS Hank 3 per Cent. Cons. 611 3 per Cent. Het. 60i} 4 per Crum 711 5 per Gent. Navy 91{ Leong. Ann. 151 7-16 THE STATESMAN. LONDON: SATURDAY, MAY 23, ISM RESIGNATION OF MINISTERS. This event, so essential to the salvation of the no, tion, we have at last the heartfelt satisfaction to announce.--ScarLely had we laid down our pen almost in despair for the fate of ,our beloved country, which had been entrusted to such con• Omptible politicians as a LIVERPOOL, a CASTLEREAGH, and a VAreserrarr , when we were unexpectedly aroused from our gloomy apprehensions, to contem plate brighter• prospects. The spell which held the PRINCE Reoesrrbound, was in a moment dissolved by the constitutional vote of the Commons House of Parliament, who, in this single act, have done more real service to the country than all the enact ments of the Legislature for these twenty years past. The Address of the House of' Commons, declaratory of the incapacity of Ministers, had not been voted many honrs before it was presented by the Hon. Mover, and the noble Lord who seconded 14 . t0 his Royal Highness the PRINCE REGENT, seated on the Throne, who, in an unusually firm and 4711- fied wanner, returned the following answer:—" will take into my most serious and immediate consi deration, the Address which I have received from the House of Commons." It would seem that the mush room Ministry entertained no idea that the vote of the House of Commons would be regarded by the PRINCE as theirfiat; for, except Mr. R.T DER, who on this occasion displayed more than usual penetration, they all clung to their posts till the unequivocal words of his Royal Highness, which dissipated their expec tations, vibrated in their eajs. Then, and not till then, did they feel it necessary to tender their resig nations, and to retire from the Royal presence over whelmed with disgrace and despair. Such has been the well-merited fate of a LIVERPOOL, who, as a colleague of Mr. PITT,, assisted in plunging this country into the present war, and enabled him to fol low up that abominable System which has proved so fatal to liborty, and to the commercial intereos of a great people. Such also has been the termination of the career of a CasnentAttu, who, though of Irish extraction, had forged eternal fetters for his countrymen, and resolved to deny an immense pro portion of the population of Great Britain, the en joyment of their civil rights, because they refused to worship GOD in the manner which he, Lord CASTLEREAGH,' arrogated to himself the right of pointing out.. It is well for them that their power has bean short ; it would infallibly have proved fatal to them. But it is better, ten thousand times better for the country, that their plans have been ar rested. It opens a prospect which must rejoice the heart of every true patriot. It is a pledge that Bri. tain will yet enjoy many happy days, and that the snit of her glory, which was on the verge of setting for ever, will yet shine forth with resplended beams. Although we cannot give with accuracy the names of those si ho are to compose the new Ad ministration, we are able to state, that immediately op the vote of the House of Commons, being inlfili S daily communicated to the PRINCE REGENT, • Royal- highness sent for Marquis WELLESLEY, • gave him instructions on this important subject.-- From the Correspondence recently published, which p p o as o s L e , d i b t e i t s w e e v e i n d e t n h t e t N h a o t b n l e n n N e l a n t f q utihseand pers o nsLo rd Lt included in the late arrangements, will be applied to, because they all entertain the same hostile ideas which vete avowed by the head of their party, against the pried apretesol styledhis theantagonist. "Opposition;' t , ) 0 It n t s t , o t t h h n o t s m e , a t v h g e u r i e s fo w r l ifr LEY will direct his attention. With such men 0 That the rdl Marquisoee is ano and Earl Nnl t o co=operate; ties;uandnedrswtobood rl we sncl, io addition to these, the names of Ea ~~,- T • r - `o-C. DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. India Bands 1 p Exchequer Bills 1 d Ditto O:onium Consols for Acct. 611 Lottery Tickets £2l :18 I ~,