The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-06-29 00:00:00

I. . ~ 1 • •.1 ,; )11 ! • 11.0; were in many respects highly reprehensible. Dr. be Buchanan recommettile,l the using of every means of : clot coercion towards ;he N'..thoutcdativ as a wise policy. ;him In a publiCation 14 Lich he held in his hands, one of . deli! the Missionaries tells the Braplitts that they ate all , old deceivers, wicked and malicious, and t hat the y have : no, been the means of throwing a number of God's I trot creatures into hell fire. Let itoot be supposed that ' ten the llindoos were indifferent to this language. We to - had told' the people of India ' ever and over again, `would , that they should enjoy the fret and uninterrupted i derably, exercise of their religion. The confidence that they i legegrauted wouldnot he interfered with in their re li g ion, was ! tion, what had chiefly hitherto kept .the immense popola- :Sur' tion of India in wiling obedience to our Gotern- ; hat went. It was only of later years that a new policy i plai bad crept in, a policy which involved the grossest i tb 'violation of our faith. If the doctrines stated by Dr. . them, still had t; blessing ._ . ... Buchanan and others were to be acted on, this seer, Ito parliament ; and Ministers foetid t h ey th at. were would soon be reversed in India. He ' would have I very fit to have such concessions made to them. Ile treated these doctrines of the Missioneries with the was afraid that this would be the case in the present ceetempt and indignation which deserved, if they I instance, 'i. if Ministers were . allowed at , their hid not, r; sine degree, been countenanced by the , leisure to name what ports inight-be allowed toim- Honourable :.! .mber for Bramber (Mr. Wilberforce) port front Intlia.—lVlinisters might pin in patron in his speech t: e other evening. In' opposition to i age, but the Revenue might suffer fatuity (rom the that Hon. Gentle:mo s be contended, that every . increased facilities to smuggling. lie next objected man at 01 acquainted with India would impute the , (at considerable length), to the mode of licences finniorali of the Init-os to the oppressions , which was prescribed, and which WOUid i in case of ender %chi •'; they had se 104 g-suffered. Crettt re. 'an opposition between the Board of Ginty* :and 'forms In mo i . could near besieldenthq wete the the Court of Directork place the Govereemeni . fil Work only of time. The Books of Morality of the; the Company in a most degrading light in the eyes llimloos were many of them deserving of great ap. ;of the n atives. An individual to whom the Di probation.l The lion. Gentleman then read several rectors - objected, might , fiud..hts way, there iiki • 1 extracts from a book Which he said was familiar to !spite of them, and toast .when be was in In- i every one in India. , lie next read a copy of the : die, that he was there in defiance pf. the East Hindu,. prayisi, the sublimity 'of . which, he said, i India Company.--This was a thing . that ha i could biniTy We exceeded. The kecoont 'given of the ' thought would be quite inconsistent . with the good ; Indians by Orme was not sufficieetly favourable to !government of any colony or distant posfeseen. H. t them; b 4 k is conclusion consreled - the opinion I then made maor:ebservations on the Venifest Aets,, c which he had delivered, that the vices of the Hindoos i which was to be ,tbt protection against seniggling ;; were attributable chiefly to the defect' of their Go- land contended, that in the great difficulty of makinc vernmen , a; and not to their religion. The Hon.' out the proper manifest, those who were, Menai 44 Gentleman then proceeded to give an account' of the' Ministers could be more 'easily excused for any little result of an attempt at coercion, made by a Mis- I irregularity. The proposed system mist end ih the i sionary, in a district of India, where he resided in ! ruin of the Company, if the private ender should, an official character. Al the ' Hindoes converted re- : come perpetually petitioning for a tkle, ;trade, and turned in a short time to their former religion. He I the Company should (as it meet) be compelled t4-,,' concluded with quoting tile opinion of Sr William ! come annually before Parliameat to oak. for assist., Jones, that neither blitiiitimen nor Maces would ! ante. Every clause, except that width forbad the' ever beconverted by Missionaries. ` Bishop to trade, related to the trade palely. He sao, Mr. WM. SMITII observed, that the Hon. Gen- tno reason uhy the Bishop should ..not. becilowed to Rnn ein who spoke last had, froin the candour and ' trade : he thought it - was the most harmless function moderation of his manner, • Imptiiiitbil the Hensel in which he eoeld entgge r i tles. coniaTe conceive any very mufti' on his behalf. The residhnee in India'cif I other occupation fit r hit .It was,in fact, a mere the Bon. Gentleman, when he had' OppOrtunities for ,'job of an appointment to throw patronage into the making observttibus on the conduet itti d character - 1 bah& of Mlnisteri. The Bishop, it seemskateatunti of the ilindoos, strengthened that Iteil4tsion. The ! trade, and the Missionaries are to perfotta.all the Hon. Gentleman had; hoWever, Waked in tome i work of religious amelioration. So much for,.,theh misrepresenteions in the course of hlispoech.—His proposed Cherch Establishment in India. The 'ye. Hon. Ft lend (Mr. Wilberforce) on a former evening Item was altogether one which meet gradmillyolpd had never made use of a single expression respecting. in a 'bolt time, throw the whole patronage of ledia 'Dr. Buchanan, it was unfair, therefore, to represent I into the hands of the Crown. The Directors,theree him, as resting on authorities which he never quoted, I fore, were looked up to by the country as the','per:; Ills next misrepresentation was, that we wished to use I 1014 W were instead forward and oppose this sys means of force in India.—[No, from Mr. Lushing- tete., ft they eolkeeoted to receive the Charter under 1 tool—This was not asserted ; but all the cautions ! present circumstances, they are bound to prove, that 1 of the Ilouourable Gentleman were made on the sup- they have reasonable hopes of meeting all the dill position that 'violent measures were in contemplation. culties- of the measure, and thal.,they will, not be Amidst the contradictory statements by persons of , forced to tome, year after year, to Parliament for an. high authority, and of almost equal number, respect- I sittarice, Ile was new a friend of the company, but ing India, what were they to do ?—Were they .not iif -they were not prepared to show this, he should in to base recourse to fi rst principles ? Was it not ' future oppote the grant of all assistance to them. universally allowed, that the doctrines laid down iii Lord . CASTLEREAGH; said „tke speech of the the Sacred Books of any nition had an influence ou Right Honourable °encl. ~. . litttfiellculated rather the practice of the peo p le P—The Honourable Gen. I f .„. in . n - r ' ni , t ii• d i m - inte c ~ 4 0 - i i d uncolore d . If, tlentan had asserted, that the sixty millions of Odt h -1 6 - *4 -- ev r e 7 - th - i go t ti ohise ;A id , Gelideileil vas subjects in India were of' peaceable detneanoer and- mi . as ' l to . !xi ausikered;° he sheold promote the I good behaviour. For his part he was dispoked to I L: 0 , , in cit ot i oiilt i ee . oht i e j ' lli 's' ' o bj ect i ons to t h e I take every statement respecting India, eree by those 'ALl s l oa ,.. , t who had been eye witnesses of what they state, with fli g ht be answe ' ret in detail., He. meant no I many grains of allowance. The Honourable dee- tleinan then proceeded to refer to a letter ftitet ltdr. __, • • ' , disrespect, but he never eardn speech less solid and I substantial. • " • Schwartz,_ t.te Missionary , on one of the piptislejtc.. :Mr. 104, T IWOINIVS., ;i1 answer to Mr. Tierney, 1 fore the lletisr, containing an account directly' i t i said the Directors would not be responsible for the 'evince with a representation of Mr. Montgoinety ' Charter, but the •Parliaraent who forted it upon Campbell. The letter of Mr. Schwartz bare 'inter- I them. The Company was placed between two ene nal marks of veraco y , and its Author bore the . very ! miss—the Philistines and the Annitehites. They I were at first a Joint...stock Comoituhtiten a Offers highest character iti India. If the accounts of the Missionaries were not 'to be credited, their enemies went Company, and now he fearetelmy would aid ought not more to be credited . But let t h e c h ine . , in being a Bankrupt Company. . . ' ter of that creed which the Missionaries preaehtdis bat Mr. MAIUtYAT objected to the system of Aip., contrasted with that of the Hindoos, and henti tet i building in Indict if our docks and arsenals were to any candid man judge. .For instance, thegrait Le.' be transferred to that hemisphere, and our sailors' gislator of the latter, Menu, thui described the dia. to Ametica, there would soon be an end of our racteristic of women—firstly, inordinate love of nava gre'mtuess. • ~ ~ . , . . . .. finery—secondly, immoderate Inst— . .toiiitly, great . Mr. CHARLES GRANT defended the system of anger—fourthly, deep resentment—fiftirly, malig- property and taeation, and the police of India. Hat nant envy—and sixthly, that which was' the natu- . maintained that a fressirsde would hetinsafe tilt* the rat consequence, vicious conduct. N o w $9 appealed ' natives shouldbe math* and ripened for such a result to the House, whether such a creed, as &se pre. by moral amelioraties. .. .. ~ ~ cepa, must engender, was calculated to produce such I Mr. FAWCETT 'efillo for a considerable time; a degree of social happiness asthe adoption of Chris- ' but in so low a toni•of . vokr,, as to be completely tiani y. Ind. , pendently of all religious faith, he inaudible . e Ull' 4 ask whether, as Philosophers and Moralists, I . ' ' • ' • .' * 1 1 'lke House then went i ot a a Committee • an d of the &wee could esteem the absurd, the bloody su- . s .1 • .. the motion of Lord, . CAST LgIII.AGII, the. Bill persition, the murdering of infants, the burning or .committee ro and was ordered mires, which the llindoo creed sanctioned and re. passed t he . „; 4. forma,_, to be recommit t e d en . itursaay. comme.ntled, and prefer such precepts and praiticiei to the morality of the Christian doctrine ?—lle The Corn Bill watt put elf till to-min -row. would assume—certainly not.—But with all his re. The House went into Committee on the Fre-arms Terence for the doctrines of Christianity, he would Bill, the Glass Act, the Isle of Man Bill, the Irish not have them propagated by force or violence. Distillery Amendment Bill, the Irish Telma Bill ; Mr. LUSIIINGTON explained. and they were ordered to be reported to-morrow. Mr. TIERNEY observed, that not a syllable had A Report of the Committee of Ways-and Means been mentioned in the Resolutions respecting those was brought up, and the Resolutions agreed to. topics which had been so fully discussed. He should, The Roman Catholic Bill was ordered to be read therefore, endeavour to brindthe question back to its a second time on Thursday. original situation, as it stood. on the Resolutions .. r. H. ADDINGTON moved for leave to bring i which had now been passed by the Lords and Com- m a Bill to extend the services of the 't ower Hamlets mons.Those Resolutions had determined that the Unite d M n lila to all parts of the Kingdom. The system of the East India Company, which had been Bill was read a first and second time, and to be coin. so long established, shortld not in future go on as it witted tomorrow. ' ' done formerly ; and the question now to coast- Mr..BABINGTON moved for the copy of a letter' was, a 3 to the substitute which was to be put from Dr. C. Bucimutin to the Court of Directoi* place of the former system. He could not, dated the Bth sof Juno, 14313... , . , . . ,wever, avoid saying, that he . thought the system thick had been established for Indian Govern. Mr. COUR.TENAY objected on the woad '4 . 'tt, and which bad existed . for so many years, irregularity. • . . • the best calculated for the geed government of Thp SPEAKER. said, that having already 4rauted empire. It was now proposedtbat the trade to phrtof the correspondence, which.was certauily ir na should be given to the Company for twenty 'regular, they must now complete that Irregularity. , ears but that the trade to India was to be thrown Ile hoped , that no, such irregularity would again 2 pen. He could not see how It was poisible that occur. .. , —w:.; sii.::, 4 .- - .i , . 1 . trade could remain abut *lle the other was The motion was then puttied carried. open ;. and this trade to India, which was now to Adjourned at half past one o'clock. P F!,1P"Irlil .c.??Pilto . co _mr eget , ihich ha d bean - sari " !Wiling Ci . to their' table wh a ckmina intbrtnation should not issue against him, foie libel on Lady Perceval.— The Lemke Counsel read LOrd slid Lady Percevales affidavitooretnat,kiag l . that, Lord,Perceretcee.id only ' have better)* (or °wake of formality, e,s he aid not swear to aey thing of his own kiiowledg4;bilt Snerety toyhie:belief of the truth ' of what Lehi' Perteval . stated.' Thesubstanct of theoffidevit *as, that certain Lefties; peeporting to be signed, one by Lords El don, Coestleresgb, and Liverpool, addressed to the Princess of t Weiss • another by Lady A. Haniilton, :• •..- . • I • as u.4l,wyropr to t h e Loomer ; and another by Lord 1 Littwpeol i ip, the Princess of Wales, appeared in the' News or lie 4th April ; that the Princess of Waled' fold badly Percent, that she had not received any enclt letters; dot Lady Anne Hamilton declared she had notetritten aey such letter; and that Lady Per ceval believed, the said letterelvere forged and fabri teed: that on the 6th of 'Jape it was stated in the r 'that h fir ti f Alt 'ad& delivered the"s a i d 1 ,. ess,, on i o 4 tver 1 teri to the Defendant, and hid declared,thit he received:them from Lady • Perceval; with her di. rectiens to givethem to Defendant, which statement the Defendant declared he believed te be true; thereby' Intimating, : that Lady Perceval ,was, the author of forged and fabricated litters. ~, Lady Perceval theh swore, thatshe was not theetithitietfithiidator of the letters in question, nor privy to tlieet, nor had ever ,teen them till they appeared fit the News of the 4th of April. The Learned Counsel then remarked, that fro:milli; allWavit it would be supposed that Lady :Percent's / waf Welly ignorant of those letters till they appeared ie the News, and thr t, like a sensi tive plant, 'The ivould retire from a paragraph in a Newspaper. lie was sorry that he should have to state circumstances from the affidavit of Mr. J. Mit., ford, and afterwardalrom that of the Defendant, not very compatible with the statement ofi Lady Per ceval. He then rind the affidavit of J. Mitford,. which was to the follewing . effect :-r-He swore, that he had been for many months employed by: Lady . Perceval, in getting into the dilferent Newspapers paragraphs relative to the Princes'!" Of Watesl that Lady Perceval gave him the letterii4qiistionin OM', that they might be inserted in a Newly:pee, sea said,' I that the Defendant was , most likily: to do justibet tit 1 ' them; Lady P. satd,ihe ettAfibietit iva's a dittgetbile one ; but that it was necessary to 6oropet 'lllO gram- trig a larger . establishnient to the Princedia W a le s ; ' thht he copied the .letais from a nvatitiscriptlii lady hand:wilting ; .The said the 'spirit ofjobb Bell Watt dng'hway l lutt that would' ake him cite; moron l ; tha t it would be necessary that Defendant . and hile,frifi,shotild he out of the way; In case of st , storm ,sipd teenitinett i i platii.orhire they should go: i ) she 1 et de*Aent it he w,Onlit hare any Übjection to go tO' r. WaAndoti', madhouse, incase of nee'easizi ty ;, kpoold tie iirleast*o6l. in depeeent'd way.'- 6 r WP.-flePt . „ to t ; The said thedanger war, lest dgopeent , onld be ' br ought a befall, the bar .of nt the tlfriuttlof rd., which w i liel .he very nepled!tt ~aa he tine* ‘9? ,mach : that deponent letving comae ther Lady, Perceval desired' hint th hatten'to town, an 0,0 potooant to . insert them in the next Sunday's Noof depOnent' wit unable to : meet with Defend aKtill the'llieof April, when he delivered the let-, tlivi i.. , AltteliitirDefitidanl he had received them from SY Percerit "::41iitjent *never thought tlie letters' to have been tett ; Aithiugh Lady Percent's 'feat turprited Ml.' • • • . The DefetiititONt af fi davit stated, that on the Vitt lit IHaeili'Jolin *Milford called wren. him, with a . , , , . . . , i. . . letter, from. Lady Percent,. which assured him, that idi Plcier should be the amigo communicating to The Public ( several most impertaut . ittieles relating to 1 lo w ii r pois of. Weil OW id . do nievien ce, he 4d reveals *event artiait s , *le: Of 'them in the kiiid.writini of . j t aditiriiie4Ahal; on the Ist of 1 April, 'he was ht*ltid . fh'e litfikilln 4fieition by Mr.ii J. 11,titfOrd," witoeiild lib likeirglit 'them' from Lady Perotral,; thait ! Difindant,' not doubting the Weirt"4.l‘r.J, Mlttord, antrbelieiring them to be genuine; dip! . "publish • there : that the Defendant, early ie the mareang; of the same Sandi/ on which the' letters nueved, ineoinied 1 - .,di Pircerat, by leg. .ter ! of .what he had done, incitkeii# 'loNeirtlftliperl end ask ed paraoti for any verbstrintrecaraelEg; Htil received, in answer, a l tter from Lady Phtteiatfl stating, that siege. she ha ; . 0404sOrlytri Speechly to ' wait upon him that mere g, she t6ougbt that mode might be liable to mistake. That if not very in convenient to Defendant, she • 4 iited ,for •an inter view at her house, when she bad ne desalt, by con ferring 'tor a few momenthe neeessaryirectl, fi cation would take piece. Is conseqeencepfAe letter, De fendant went to Lady Perceval, endtte met J. Mit: ' ford coming out of lee room where ; ye.belleved Tandy Percent was. Lady Perceval ,mid,,iltere must be some mistake, as the bad, opt iiiie thit aforesaid J. Mitford linos Thursday, and .believed he , was at Woolwich, aUhoagb Defeadant 104.,seen,thevtitt J. -Mitford on Friday, end, also had, seen him . c r eme out . of the room. Lady Perceval then tried to prevail on. 'the Defendant to state that the letters were forgeries,' which he Welled, unless he was permitted to slat* hew beaten by them. Defendant, at the reqaest or riady Perceval, prepared a paragreph• to be inserted .in the daily papers, stating the, locten i to, tie forgeries ' He aletys refused to inert the Ooeteedictihn in tb Amu, without giving the necessary . explanatien 110 'he believed Lady , Perceval thetight„llet s ho 40 seated, for she said be was.the sagiony;,of her, end fie I v tfansity,.atid desirethee,son to ke,hi,se . hy the h 4 and promise 'to be -hle.Nen,d. „ ant thought , emeeesevy to Mete 11 . 1*411 11 sPhilfritik bleb ), 7 bad t e . i the letters ; and he allowed he d 4/, at e • Dared Kb Mitford'a statement to be cerrect• Mr. i I 30 101 had d der 11 1 1 1 i 3 p 1 il howe ',hie] ~.. • 111 rent • ' 0 ins . that i I . , Chin 4 year open one open 'IN • . - e .'. l :. t: ° ..L r./..1 r! ~I : i 'is ...-..;;;:-..: -...-. . '` .• • .. .. . ... ' irtir .,.. 5 . TAi i mmin ..,, i ,....,. ;, ...,....;;;:,..„ ....• ...:.... ..,....: 1....-...—i:...L 1----1,..-4Ne,--j."." "--------, • -A—518m......*L2.11.--.2l:Yaldliamm -....--:. thrown open, bad heleVer . oeet, 200 lyeifi Ote set ; • L.4oollltree, Lf01111C31:' r: • Mit :sire monopoly of.** Company; -jilt ePpiared to ' ' • ''' "'''•' . :l4-mhial • ~ , h . b n that it would bit : matter of great.diacultfto 41eillfeWiratmeristmen. Jests All. •7 . The Defebdi•tifitait btikeit tiii to teeersettieissilla' 1 tine the limits of the territories incladed under the TIM MVO . 06 liktiOULD• and d Charter of the Company, and th ose which were meet or AU Court, Wing been' Convicted ** f isting ap t abd lw to be under the direction ots the Board of Con- in his,possetition wal ptoceei marked,ritlt thohread N E Dell. Ile objected to its being left open to Minis- arrow, and. was pentypped , to be fined one shilling, and d ie rs to name at a future day the out-ports that were be allowed to trade with India. This repladon confined nine months, , ' • tie , ould increase the patronage of Govern,agukponsi- , TIM =t i s 14 . ISAACS. ' The Defendant bi th is cite had been• found guilty t glibly, and places would probably have Beet Privi- I lcita- of atte r n,o 6. 4 t? bribe ' she *Seen who had seized the' the gegranted them from the effect of private.ool naval stores. smith were In the possession of Ray- ed on, when no such rights ought to be grisself.---,-- bould; bleXtitenet was, that be should be confined WI ich had been the case after - the Warehous a& Bill id passed. Chester, Exeter, Gloucester, and other ' fifteen months 111,Pfelwpte. • sit: 4 ~ , • laces, that were reported by the officers of,customs r,l .i.,7 .A l , P.,1. AFM O 7I • . . f°l •be quite unfit to have that system extended to Mr. Tpyrs,c c t alkoy , cenike Fri ' Ginnie ,Nisi, 'Bit win. still bad the blessing to send Representatives which had 'Wen . —1, - • , r , killing ' Ci` ' the Difetidant ; gli A - ...i.....:• ....L.:l , tons . .• .....Laidmi tritheirntitinef Aren't' i vii 1 7 I ( I Wit before tOired C irsioo AT 4 rift.thit inacter ; knew of .on. It would had had no come 4th of April ; btu the publititiun ; with her,--lf hat necessity ity for a rect or Lady Percevi l 'sltion of the Col bad alias, that she pin rise. It 'vindicate hiemelt u the forger of iettays wader great names. • Mr. Cu nwoon followed us Um same side, and said, that as Mr. Mitford was the authorhed agent of ',lily Perceval, and stated that the documents came from -her, the Defendant couldluiietto doubt but that the -docurnetits did come from her. From speaking of the madhouse, it was clear thnt she was aware ~f the consequences. There was a clear motive ;it.) WI 1 Percevat shanld wish the establishment of the Princ•ls 1 of Wales to be increased; but he would not 'utile on that part of the subject. LordEt.t.Essoacinan.—The less RIM on the tea. tlvi parts the [Mier. • Mr. PARK, on the part of Lord and 1..* Nee. val, said, the affidavits were ut en amter, 14 4 t 44s application, as his Clients had no :opportunity ,to answer them, and the publication watts** deuled.--:. The publication was undqubtedl ithilloav and ' it was nectitsart to go 'hel l sinn tr i bunal :in order ti have Me. MitYad 'Witted. • Lord ELLENBOROUGII.—You can have that bt the Way Of indictment as well as by the preseut ap. plication. Mr. PARK said, be would show, by decided cases, that the Court will interfere on such occasions. It was stated, that the Defendant only published a pro per statement ; but he would ask if it were a pro. per statement ? (He then read a long paragraph nut of the News). At present it was affidavit against affidavit; it was impossible to say where the truth lay. lie cited the case of the King v. Lynn, 2 Bar nardiston, to shew that the Court would grant an information, although the charge'was denied. Mr. Justice BAILEY asked, if it wete not in a better book ? .• • Mr. PARK relied on the good seuse.,l4,lhe•vase, not on the authority of tbelooX. Mr. Justice Dastrice.—Lord Minsletdittid ther* was not a •Single Report in the book Correct - ill • through. Nit. PARK said Lady Perceval had sworn that sire , was mot directly or indirectly concerned in the pub petition, and this affidavit was written before it could be known what would.be sw.oru 9a the other side.— To prove that the Court would graqt a criminal in formation, although the charge was denied on-the 'opposite side, he cited the case ales v. Sheep, An. drews, 384. lirt, Justice Banc' said, it, was only the Defen dant';_ own affidavit„ Mr, Parta,--There has. been no opportunity to icoiltradickhlr. Atitford's affidavit, and the gravamen iwas the puhlication as to the motives of the parties, he would not go into them, particularly after the hint `his Lordship given. Lord, PLLENEOROUGIL—I recommend it to the 'discretion of the Advocate, not to go into the col lateral matters; but do not let it he said, that, the' interests of any individual were compromised; in. consequence of, any advice of mine : yoo will useyour own discretion. Mr. PARK said, .there had been no opportunity to contradict the statement of the opposite party. I Lord ELLENDOROUGII.—Do you wish an oppor- I tenity to deny the letter ? I • Mi. PARK said, he could not deny that the letter was the hnnd-writing of Lady Perceval, bat it might be explaitted, and. for that reason he wished it to ha put in way of investigation. Mr. HoLe followed on the same side. Lord Ewen no oovon.---T h e Court, by refusing this application, does not abut the door to.the party com plaining: If she wishes, she may apply to the paper place for redress ; she may prefer an indiamect be fore the Grand Jury: the decision of this Court will not prevent her; but the Court exercising that dis cretion, which it applies on all occasions, thinks that the present application ought, to be re fused.— roe eat , own part, I fogad myself on he r letter, whirl,- jilt my opinion, repels bet from any success in tits application she has made to the Court. —Mule teased. , AS, whales q 4 feet.. 6 inches in lebgth, and 17 feet inches in diameter, was .killed and brought on shore at Maycook's Bay, Barbadoes, on the 10th April, being the first fish of the • kind ever seen neat the island. A very large quaptity of bones is annually col . . lected in Norfolk, and exported from Yarmouth to distant counties, where, ;titer being ground or crushed, they are used as manure by the farmers, at ' the rate of trona 60 tq Bd, bushels per acre. At Worksop, in N o ttinghamshire' .50,0001. worth of bates ore annually sold at tts. 2 d. per bushel. ExccUTION.--il'liki24on, Yartoovd, and Bitrgeis, the throe men convicted at the last Cheste As , i 2 t's lar a rape, were ex.eno tett ,there on Saturd ay . Thei declared their innocence. ,tolhe last moment, as t:. the use of foroiblelagyfoso. About 400 flatten, th eir eenarades, attendetl; 40, after the wretched nlea ware cut down, contegred.their bodies to Northwicl, tci be interred. • At Dstwlish, on the 20th lost. In th* 4Sd year of his nge, T. Barker, lisq; son of the tier. F. B. Barker, Rector or berth Clttovit„ wn, p. J. He e nt Etwi. of CCeindry. _• He w as yottned Welker a the hate Sitibti Lord Vitronat Lifted, fonsetly Lora ohaacct; tor of Ireland.' Oa the 17th Itr4. at Whitby, in Yorkshire, iged urntartis Gf 100 years, Mn. andrerd, relate of ittnlyertl , us TitsnAtaper of Gibraltar, •and of the datt•tiagmeot Voot. On the 24th inst.., :4 his, rood core" Clith s in c o lta:Oliero S' r C.Vnilwajle_j4__y, t±!11±r.22::=2:272.1=...5p. • '''''' 7777-77 '' . LONDON: Printed and Publi sh ed by Dxt . Lnr.t ,; 1 11 " lira•rienvn Oilleg. S., rivets:4-M. , • ; , .. 7 .• — zsz ---- --4 - ...1zr. - .4.41.,•47....,..,_, „ . ..., 4. '...,_•._.„...2_3.4.e.,.er,___.__,,::, rays been considant, and persisted in re several ons. l ,Copylet.eln this was the ansvthr_ , ,'..., • I 'that( Loro rpi'diecld thhilek' .1 r Ito 'Michele' liket"rttle• It *is liir ".. pls ill Ifiei 'pert' ; df" Ladja Percent to deferet, : . but- her. eoudect . was. denionstratiser• of those letters. befese,•theii publi cs.a ippear from her. afgdavit, :that she imunicallou with Defenilant till the ut tie on'tlnteddy /dually trans mi ts ;. and if the (ether ' s *ere .not connect. -if she , •were perfectly. innocent,-- for •A' conference, •.. whet, mee t . nifieation? r —There was : no pro enca !sal to ask fo r the parliculay intent*" ourt, in . 's matter to vibich she hut was the duty • of the Defendant toe lf, othen.stise he Would he considered.