The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-02-24 00:00:00

ST. KATHARINE DOCKS. The Rift foe constructing Wet-I)M's, &c. at St. Katharine's, in 'tile Part of London, is now in progress *lough the House of liktenesozs. A like sneesure was submitted to Parliament last year, bet was witherann *consequence of rite late period of the ;hen Ses sion. and of the species c.f op position offered by interested paints to the reviM eise extension of the wet dock systein—au oppasit:on, toe character of which was strongly marked by a Conaminee of the House* a special Report, dated lx of June, Mt The pretnetria of the it. Katharine Docks Fliil have renewed their applicatiOli with increased confidence. They ask for no ee rlaaitte or immunities; and in the legitimate employ - Meet of merr,ntile capital for the accomplishment of an object of giant public utility, seek no other advantages than thaw which at tach to a spirit of honotirsble rivalry 'though the mean. of corn gtetitiom A cersiosive use was made out before a Committer of the ilouve last &anon or the indispensable necessity of additional Wet ion accom ' ouidation, contiguous to the seat of busier's': it was ciao proved, that the quantity of wines and spirits dent:Kited during Ste Fiat year , upon the quays of the London Dock Company. ex ceeded the means of proper accommodation by upwards of 20.000 sank& As London Dock Company have at last, though reluctantly, 'donned the want of additional accommodation .1 but they cannot increars the swat without additional powers from Parliament. The Wen India Dock Company have, in their application to the Lords of the Treasury for the purchase of the tiny Canal, al leged the want of further room. )le other legal places than at the London Docks. for the bonding 01 Ones and spun', or indeed of merchandise in general, exist within a distance of nearly four milegfrom the Royal .k:xchange. - The legal - or sufftranee whisk which nearly all ebb dry, ▪ discherge of ships above 200 olds a heavy cargo lie aloneside Whelp, spirits, tobacco, codee, net be bonded there ; aid the WTI istosnelleot nature of the land-ap and frequently of serious • bon the crowded state of obstructed, and can only be re- Common have meanly molded • given to the anstiurtion of a found ;" That they felt straggly im , with the important benefits an of Parliament be given to additional Docks in the Port ...o accrue to the trade arid ris improved illp mercial code and were ffiltincily alleged by their anticipations have . British manufactures ex luring the year ending 10th ah the like period in 1823. transit trade during a similar li'arehousing Act did not take Ey , quantity of foreign matcher)- , . - ----- By an increase of murals, during the last year in the Port of Lon don, as compared with the preceding year, of between 2,000 and 3,000 ships and. vessels. The benefit the public will derive by the reduction of charges through the consteuction of 'the proposed Docks, is also manliest, atece the mere agitation of the measure has produced a considerable diminution in the rates upon certain goods in the Port cf Landon; thus proving, that umle: the influence of monopoly the charges were exorbitant. It is also evident, that a reduction cannot be permanently rem red to the public without competition, as the London Dock Company, under a local Act (which is perpetual), the 51st Geo. HI. cap. 49, wows a power of exacting rates from certain goods, for the bond ing of ehich no other legal places exist within nearly four rodeo of London Bridge, of full thirty per cent. above tl,use to which, nada an apprehmeion of such competition, they have lately bees Woad. The measure of the proposed St. Katharine Dock', although a undertaking, partakes of a public character; it is supperted y li tri: commercial, manufacturing, and shipping intereete gene tally, whose sentiments have been strongly expressed in numerous l i Memorials presented to the Lords of the Treasury, and further I testified to the House of Commons in various Petitions. 1. From Merchants, Banker', and Traders of the Metropolis, signed by upwards of 1,700 leadirg mercantile establishments, some of whom are considerable Proprietors of the London and other Docks in the Port of London. 2. From Shipowners and others concreted with the navigation of the river Thames, signed by upwards of 1.600, complaining also of the regulation adopted by some of the Dock Compa nies, under which the crews are turned out of the vessels, and compelled to lodge ashore, by which eviltabiu are comeacted, and the character of the British seaman demoralised. a. From the Wine and Spirit trade. 4. From the Merchants, itc. engaged in the Seed trade. From between three and four hundred of the inhabitants of St. Katharine's and St. Boto/ph Aldgate, who, together with die owners of the property required lor the purposes of the mea sure, are two to one in favour of it, as proved on the 7th inst. before a Cionimittee of the House of Commons upon the peti. _two for leave to !trivia in the Hill. Pd. oen the Merchants, Shipowner, Ice. of the following ports: — Newcastle, Sunderland, Leith, Hull, Grimsby, Kirkaldy, Lyme-Regis, Yarmouth, Ipswich, Harwich, Colchester, Sheerness., Rochester, Doter, Ramagate, Sandwich, Mar gate, Rye, Portsmouth, Newhaven, ('owes, Poole, Wey mouth, Jersey, Dartmouth, Plymouth, Falmouth, Pan gaea*, Swansea, Padatow , Bristol, Cork, Dubin.. Add parties connected with the coasting trade with the Pert of Loo ftri are deeply interested in the success of a measure calculated to afford considerable relief from the existing impediments to the navigation, and by establishing competition to produce a reduction in the charges of the Port. In fell accordance with the system of liberal commercial policy lately adopted by the legislature, this Session has been opened with an address to the Throne, stating that in obedience to his tlajesty's gracious recommendation, Parliament will persevere In the removal of inconvenient restrictions upon commerce. By Parliament giving its sanction to the construction of the St. Katharine Docks, the advantages of free end open competition, and a reduction of rates and charges upon commerce and navigation in the Poet of London, will be secured to the peblie. tending orders of the Houses of Parliament, have in every ref/poet keen complied with, and one year's notice has been given of tie proposed measure, being six months beyond the period required by the forms of Parliament. It is difficult to conjecture any public Cr Parliamentary ground on which this measure of great public silty can be opposed, ahoold a renewal of the efforts at resistance offered last Session :eke plea, it will present the following CONTRAST. re FAVOUR OF TUE MEASUIILE• AGArIiST THE lIEASUP.E. Individual interests. The Public. Advocates for exclus.ve prui lieges, and compulsory regula. does. The commercial. manufactor.' sag, nod 'Ai ppteß interests. The importers of rev mate rials, to the uses of British 10- 41mitry. The consumers of foreign cam nallities' in the metropolis end its vleioity, sad tott:l of the cut Ton& rriends of free trade, t titlm, reasonable etarges, improree management. Certain of the thareholders in the several Docks of the Pot of London. Some of the wbarfinge•.s and warshOuse-keepers. The promoters of monopoly. and such is benefit by exorbitant rates. imam prima prreferendual est. DIABOLICAL ATTEMPT AT ASSASSINATION• It se reedy hoespeo ereuespinetta t, talk to record the eoteatie- I na 0 r . .. , ate ige w mis timed ch aracter within the city o r 71 too t ft with poletliar feelings of tam &tient anti brief ATROCIOUS MURDER AT ASTON CLINTON. COMMITTAL OF THE MURDEP.ERS. The bounty of Bucks has of late been the theatre of the most horrid acts that can be recorded in the history of alai?. Scarcely bad the alarm that prevailed amongst the persons resident at Whaddon, Aylesbury, and the parts adjacent. produced by the late murder of Abraham Hogg, by Lynn, subsided, before they were again thrown into the greatest agitation by a desperate attempt made on the life of the toll-eallector of Winslow., which is at pre ' sent enveloped in mystery, so far as relates to who were the per petrator', and ever since Saturday night last the alarm has been trulescribaLly increased, in consequence of another foul murder having beeu committed in the pariah of Aston Clinton, a small village on the tornpikn.road, about two mile, and a half from Tring, and three and a haft from Aylesbury. The place where the inhuman dead was perpetrated it a road enl!ed Greening. street, leading from the high road by the side of the New Bell public-house, and the unfortunate victim is a young man About twenty years of age, minted William Morris, a farming man, in the employ of Mr. Horwood, of College Farm, of re smtabie connexions. The perpetrators of the revolting deed are, Jahn Alkn, nornas and Thomas RIVIT3, alt labourers, is the parish of Aston Clinton, and associates of the unfortunate Morrie, who were apprehended before their victim was cold, and lodged in Aylesbury gsol. On Sunday they underwent an exatni nation in private, before Sir JOHN DASHWOOD KING, Ban. and COI. Rstowxr, who thought it expedient to prevent the proceed ings being published till after the Coroner's Inquest had been holden ; and Sir J. D. RING said, that on Wednesday the pri soners would he brought up for limtl examination, when the inves tigation would be conducted publicly. The Inquest was accord ingly held on Monday, and, after an inquiry which lasted seven hours the Jury returned • verdict of " Wilful Slurder against Allen, Reeves, and Collier." EXASIINATION OF THE PRISONERS. • Yesterday forenoon. precisely at twelve o'clock, Colonel Browne, the Rev. Mr. Ashlield, the Rev. Mr. Owen, and the Rev. Mr. Turner, assembled in the Magistrates' chamber A Aylesbury, for the purpose of proceeding in the examination of the prisoners. Long before the arrival of the Justices and the opening of the Court, the concourse of the people anxious to be present was immense; and when the Chamber was opened, the spare without the bar was crammed almost to suffocation, such was the interest excited on the occasion. Shortly after the Magistrates had taken their scats, the prisoners were brought into their presence by Mr. Sherrie: the Governor of the gaol, and Collins, his assistant. They are all young moo of rather diminutive stature i Al l e3 stood about 5 feet 2 inches, Reeve about 5 feet 4, and Collier 5 feet 0 inches. They were dressed in the prison clothing, their own having been taken from them on entering the gaol. Silence having been obtained, the testimony of the following witnesses were taken by Jir. Hatten, the Magistrate's clerk, who conducts the prosecution. Joseph Thorn sworn—l live at Aston Clinton, near the spot where the murder was committed. A little after two o'clock on Sunday morning last, my brother told me that Wm. Morris had been murdered in the road, and that he was lying at the public house. About seven o'clOck I was told by Joseph Lututan, who resides in Greening.street, that he had been robbed of a hedge rail, and in consequence I ant several others went in different ditections to look for it, and in Julin NichoU's garden I found the rail now produced. (it was made of booth, and vise a most formidable wee foo, being shout four feet in length and six inches wide, and above. an inch thick, with a large spike nail at one end; it was covered with blood at one end, and wan also splintered), just within the hedge that encloses the garden, it appeared as if it had been thrown into the garden from the road. The place where the murder was committed is about twenty yards from Master Nicholls's garden. After findirg the rail. I maned it to the Bell public-house in the village, and there delivered it into the hands of Mr. John Holston], the constable, in whose possession it has teen ever since. Wm. Reeves sworn—l ant brother to Thomas Reeves, one of the prisoners, and live at Buckland. On Saturday night last, about helfmast ten o'clock, I was at the Duke's Heal public holm, at Blackburn, in company with the deceased, and after , leaving there a e overtook the three prisoners at Aston Clinton; I they were endeavouring to get admission into the New Bell public. ' house, but could tot; we then went together to the Old Bell, and failed in getting any thing to drink there. Allen, Collier, and my brother, then went on towards Allen's house, and 1 and the de. ceased followed them. As we proceeded, my brother turned round to me and said, " You deserve a good hiding," and told the deceased that he ought to have a good hiding too. My brother then left us, and went back towards his home. Allen, who had a bag in his hand, gave it to Collier, and then he (Allen) ran down the street, and returned in about a minute with the stake now produced in his hand. He said, " Now I'll end it," and then made a plunge with the rail at me, but. 1 warded off the blow with atrainire spide that I had in my'leand. Allen then struck the deceased a violent blow on the head, which knocked him to the ground, and at this moment my brother returned again and es• deavoured to take the spade out of my hand, and in the struggle, I was knocked down and kicked by Collier and my brother, and beat so units:cif:idly that the bone of my eight knee was got mai; they then loft me, and presently Allen and Collier came back to: gather, and began agsin to kick and heat me. I said, " tor God's I sake have mercy on me, for they have beat and kicked me to pieces." Collier and Allen then went sway, and as well as I was able I crawled to the deceased, who was lyirg on the slope by the side of the road. I felt his body, it being so dark I could not see him, and on feeling the back part of his head my fingers rushed into a tory deep wound. The deceased seemed quite dead, as he did not move er green. I then weot as well as I was able to Allen's house, red saw Collier standing rear the dour; 1 said, "the man is dead—his scull is split—Allen has killed him, and uo one else." Collier seemed alarmed, and said, "Is he dead, though ?" I then, went to White's house, a few doors all; and asked for a ' light, but he shut me out of doors. At this time Collier came out of Allen's house with a candle and lantern, and went with me to the deceased. Allen came out also, but he had changed his clothes. I and Collier went up to thebody, and I remained with it till some persona came and conveyed it to the Old Bell public-house. Collier assisted to convey it there. I knew of no quarrel that ex-' hoed between them. They were wrangling on the road between Blackburn and Aston Clinton. The men were ratter fresh, but' certainly not drunk. George Thom sworn—l live at Aston Clinton, and am a la bourer ; my house is about 60 yards from where die murder was committed. On Saturday night, about a quarter past eleven o'clock, I was sitting in my house, and heard a violent screaming; it seemed to be a woman's voice. I immediately ran to the door, and being greatly surprised I stood awhile to ascertain front whence the sound proceeded. In e few minutes I heard a very heavy blow, apparently given by sonic formidable weapon ; a deep groan suc ceeded tote blow, sad I heard John Allen's wife say, " God bless you, John, don't strikes hint any more, for if you do, you'll cer tainly kill hint." Colonel Boowiez —How can you s.eeak so positively to the woman is Witness resumed—l perfectly well know her voice; I could not sot her, it was so very dark. l'he voice proceeded from the street neat John AUen's house, and from the spot where the murder was committed, which is about SO yards from that house. I heard other blows given in quick succession after the former, and I heard Alen say, " I have settled him, and if you don't be off, settle you. I think Allen meant W. Reeves, as I heard Reeves say, • eiod bless you! dem% hit me; they have almost knocked and kicked me to pieces." I then went through my gar den towards Alloes house, and I row Reeves, the prisoner, and John Allen, going into his (Allen's) house; Collier stood at the door with %Ym. Reeves ; the latter said, " God bless you I Collier, come back with me, for poor Will Morris is killed ; and I hoard Reeves say, " You have killed him, John Allen, and nobody else." Allen overheard what took place, and said, " It serves him right, he had no business down here." Collier and Wm. Reeves went down the road, to the spot where the deceased was lying. I followed them unobserved, and heard Wm. Reeves say, "He lies here, and Allen has killed him." 1 joined them, and went to the body ; it was lying on the face, his forehead dented i n to a soft part of the ground, and it appeared I I to me that it must have been driven in by a blow. l ern posi tive it could not have imam so by a mere tall. A light was brought, and I found the hole was filled with blood. 1 then pro.. cured the assistance of the constables, and had the body taken to the Old 31411.47tee55i.. In glum . to tins Magistrate's Interrogatories, the witoess said, that a ape* was lying mat the body, but no blood was upon it. There is foquent quarrelling in that neighbourhood, which de terred me Imo interfering. THE BRITISH PRESS. COMMITTAL OF iV. PRORERT FOR TRIAL. Yesterday Probert was brought up for re-examination at Bow. street. The crowd has not been exceeded oo any homey occseion, with the exception perhaps of the examination of the Cato-street conspirators. After an investigation of an hour and three quarters he was fully committed for trial at the ensuing Old Bailey Megatons. Mr. Ho atrotors, the sollitor, aoended on bet:Hof the pri soner, and applied to the presiding Magistrate (Mr. M :weir Ls) to postpone the further investigation of this case for a few days, bemuse the offence having been committed in Gloucestershire he had not been enabled to make an the necessary inquiries ; but if the Magistrate would grant the indulgence of a postponement for only a sew days, he should, he thought, be able to obtain the evi dence requisite for defending his Hiatt advantageously. 31r. 111 z oen etc observed, the examination should take the usual course, and if sufficient evidence was produced 'ate should commit the prisoner at once. Andrew Meredith was then again examined, and gave his evi dence the same as on the preceding examination. James Stammers, hostler to Richard Francis, nt Phillimore place, Kensington, livery-stable-keeper—The prisoner is the person who brought the snare to me at the stables,on Wednesday last ; he said, " Hostler. will you take care of this mare for the night ; feed her well. I will leave my spun here." lam confident the pri soner is the man ; it was about seven o'clock ; he was not on the mare when I saw him, but he immediately led her into the yard, arti I took her into the stable, followed by the prisoner.—(slr. AI inshull here desired Probert to put on his hat, which he did, and the witness was still positive of his being the man.)—He then said, " Give her half a peck of corn and a feed of beans, fee I have rode her a long way to-day„ I have come 40 miles." Ile did not say where he came from. I took charge of her. He then said, " I don t know that I shall creme for her myself to-morrow, but if I don't I'll send for her, for I don't know that I shall unne this road ; if I go the other reed I'll send for her, and I'll send a note, and do not let her go without the note." He left his spurs with tae. He asked the my name, I told him, and he wanted my Christian name, and I told him James. He then said, " I'll send a note directed to James the hostler, to ashy,: up the mare." lie then left the I yard, and I have not seen Mm again till to-day in this office. The next afternoon, about four o'clock, he sent a man with a note ; the man is now present • his name is John Frewin. The note was Isere put in and read. It was directed to James, the hostler at Mr. Francis's livery-stables, Phillimore-place, Ken sington, and went-- " Let the bearer have my mare, and he will pay you for her keep. (Signed) "JAMES THOMPSON: . Dated Thursday. Witness continued—He paid me 4s. 6d. for her keep ; he then took her away. I saw her just now at the door of the office, in the possession of Ellis, the officer. It has got the same saddle and bridle on as the prisoner brought to me. I also gave Frewin the spurs. John Frewin. --I keep a green-grocer's shop in Camaby4treet, Carrahy-market. I have seen the prisoner four or fi ve times ; but about five month., ago i cooked victuals, and the poisoner came and had supper ate night about that time. He cause again on Wed nesday night last, between 8 and 9 o'clock, and asked if I knew of a lodging I could get for him ? I told him I did not. He said he saw one, as he estre along, in Cross-street. This he went and took, and went there that night. Lie came back, and had some breed and cheese. He had as much, of different things, as came to 2s. 10d. These I sent to his new lodgings. The sane night, he told me be had a mare at Francis's livery-stsbles. Kensington, and if I would fetch her on the morrow, and take her to Dixon's Repository, Barbican, he would give me a sovereign. He gave mo a written direction—l am sure the one pro duced iv the same—it was not sealed, I think—he gave it to me on Thursday afternoon—he told me to call upon him next morning; I went about ten o'clock—he then told me to go to some livery sta bles, to inquire when Dixon's sale was—he also mentioned some other places, one in St. Martin's-lane, and one in Goswell-street. I went to a stable in Oxford -street, and the hostler said, Dixon's and the Doswell-sinet sales were on Friday, and St. Martin's-lane on Wednesday. I received and gave this information to the pri soner ; it was then determined that I should call in the afternoon, and he would write a note and send me for the mare. I went to him about three o'clock, and found him at home ; he sent me for something for his dinner, and for a pot of half and half, which he and I drank ; he then wrote thrinotes. one to the hostler, at Francis's, one to Consent , High' r fee, Kensington, and one di rected to Dixon, in Barbican ; a il swear I took a note to each of the plates—this (pointing to a note produced) is the note I delivered to the hostler—he, in consequence, gave me the mare, saddle, bri dle, spurs, and two straps—l should know the hostler— he is here now—l paid him la. 6d.—l took the mare to Dixon's, in Barbican--prisoner told me to go into the park at the iron gate at Kensington, cross the park, and out at the iron gate at Tyburn, foe as she had not been used to walk on the stones she could not travel on them ; then to make for the New-road ; this I did not do, but went Memel' Crosvenor-gate, up Park-lane, Tottenham court-road, Guilfoni-street, and over the stones to the Repository by the nearest way. When I got there the gate was shut. I rang. but no person owning, }pasiud open the gate, and took the mare into thered. A; was dad!, teals gentleman tpok the note toe oil light- I fte# ofle was to be ocAl for 30 gulaiii, but that was tZo much for her. I should nct know the gentleman again. I asked him what time I could see her flown neat day ; he said twelve o'clock. I went and saw her sold for 20 guineas by the hammer. I asked the hostler if I should bring a recipe for the money ; he said no, I' need not do that, but If I came on Monday, I should get a check for the amount, and that I should then have the saddle, doe. That night Probert called at my house, and asked what she sold for ? I said lilt. This I said, as I thought of surprising him when I brought the money. We had two pots of beer and played at cards. The prisoner went by the name of " Thompson." He told me that was his name. I never knew him by :he name or " Probert." He then went to his lodgings. I saw him again on Friday night. That was the lit time I saw him. lam confi dent the prisoner is the man. He told me he had given 131. for the mare in the country, and that he had rode sixty miles on Wednes_ day upon her. Ed. Claughton—l live at 53, BarSican, and ant foreman to Richard Dixon, horse-dealer. On Thursday the 17th, about se ven o'clock in the evening, I was in the yard, near the counting_ house, and saws mare brought into the yard by a man who gave a note to our clerk, which he Immediately gave to me, and said she is a nice little mare. I read it, and said he wanted too much fur her ; he wants thirty guineas. The next morning the man came to ins, and said hebrought the mare the night before ; I told him he wanted too much for her. He said she was to be sold for what she would fetch, and not to stick to v. hat the note said about the thirty guineas. Just before the mare came out to be shown, Mr. James Eames, who isnow present, came into the yard and destribil what sort of horse he wanted. I tecontincoded the mare to him, and he bought her from the hammer; the saddle,tte.were delivered to the officer sent from this office ; we both marked them. Mr. Eames, coach -master, Angel Inn, purchased a black mare at Dixon's on Friday afternoon, for twenty guineas. I saw her this morning ; she is now in Ellis's possession. I hare not paid for her. Ellis, the officer, proved having apprehended the prisoner in the neighbourhood of Windmill -street, on Friday lost ; on searching him found three bills for refreohinent for man and one horse, and a pair of large scissors, and other articles of no consequence in this prosecution. The next day, on examining, on the back of one of thy bills, I found written in pored, " Dixon's Repository, Bar. bison." I immediately went t her e, and was informed that a black nave had beep sold to Mr. Eames; I then went to Mr. Eatnes, and found her in his stable, at. the `age) Inn, St. Clement's. I took her into charge. but left her thefe with that understanding ; she has been identified by the proseestor. The hand-writing of the prisoner was here sworn to by two re spectable witnesses : one of them, William Cousins, said, I reside in Nigh-street, Kensington, and am a linen-draper ; I have known Probert for thirteen or four teen years ; I have seen him write ; one of the notes is written by him ; the other (to the hostler) being in a disguised hand, 1 cannot identity ; I never authorised the prisoner either to sign my name or to send a mare to Dixon's Repository. Mr. Illnesses:en then said, "torn this evidence, prisoner, I am bound to commit you ; you therefore stand committed to take your trial. Probcrt—Where do you commit inc 20 ? Magistrate—To Newgate. _ Probert--accouse you befotispatil I should be sent to Gloti- Cent!. • Makstrate--I did so ; but at that time I did not know that the possisetors of the roars ciuld be prrred in titiscounty. This having been done, I can commit you to N gate to take yoar trial at the ensuing Old Bailey Sessions. _ • attention to its merits, and award such damages to the plaintiff se they would kod he deserved. Mr. W. Plunkett, examined by Mr. BROUGHADIo--WitAtell is a Commissioner of Excise; has no acquaintance with the plaintiff or defendant, and is in no way interested in the parties. IVitness was walking just by St. George's Hospital on the day and hour above mentioned. Ile heard a coach coming at a funous rate be hind him ; it soon overtook him, and his first impression w as , t h at the horses had run away. but he altered his opinion wi:en he saw the coachman make no attempt to pull up his horses. The coach ' was in the middle of the mad, and going as hard as the home could gallop. He particularly observed, that even if the rear whe e l horse had been disencumbered of his harness he could hardly have I one taster. There was nothing between the coach and the left hand side of the wav, which was the aide it ought to have goes cc. Could not say which side of the road the conch was nearest to. There was room for two coaches to pass between the stage and the side it ought to hare been on. Directly it had passed he perceived • gig a-head, on its proper side of the way, but could not exactly tell what pace the gig was going at. It struck him sonic accident would occur. Just as the coach came up the gig struck rather out of its own side, towards the right, as if for the purpose of coming alongside of some carriages which it had previously been following ; but there wasstill plenty of room for the stage-coach to have passed, if it had kept on its proper fide; but not doing so, the gig end coach came in contact. There was a tremendous crash, and the people were thrown out of the gig, and witness saw them rolhrg bloody in the mud. The stage-coach immediately stoppecr Could not see whether the coachman made any attempt to stop him horses previously. Witness went up to where the accident hap. paned ; the horse soon rose, and was not stopped till he had dragged the gig on to the pavement. Witness then went up and calhd to the coachman, who at first did not seem to pay any attention to him. but, upon his (witness's) striking the foot-board with his um brella, the coachman turned round, upon a bich witness told him he had seen the whole transaction, aid that he thought he (the coach man) was accountable for the accident. Upon this the coachman only looked at him stupidly, and made no answer: IWitneas soon after saw coachman dismoulit and assist in putting the horse into the gig, and witness thought front his behaviour then and before that lie was not sober. ‘Vinicas also saw one of the gentlemen who had been thrown out of the gige, , supported by anuthsr per so n. His forehead was bleeding profusely from a large wound. The horse had a wound in the thigh, from which the blood gushed in a stream as thick as witness's finger. Witness gave the plaintiff his card previous to his going to the hospital. Cross-examined.—Did tot see any carriage before the coach ; there was a dark carriage before the g.g, lures ioua to its turning out of its line. There was no room for the gig to have passed close to the pavement on its proper side of the road. Several carriages were before the gig. Mr. Reuttuore, surgeon at St. George's Hospital. was the next witness called. Witness saw Mr. Glasse, the plaintiff, on the tic:; in question. Plaintiff asked if the wound was dangerous, and upon being assured there was no danger, he seemed to become calm and regained his self-possession, for he seemed at first to be in great alarm. Witness found a large wound on the head, which ha dressed. Crou•esamined.—l: was not suck a wound as would endanger life. Thomas Hunt, a surgeon residing in the Strand, proved that he vimited the plaintiff for a fortnikhe after the accident. The wound was not dangerous; he considered the bruises he had received as more so ; but the degree of danger aitogether depended upon the constitution of the patient. Plaintiff had a very goad constitution. Cross-examined—His bill might amount to stout two guineas. [The fact of the defendant's being the proprietor of the conch was then admitted.] Mr. Selby proved that the horse was only sad fur about 101. instead of 2W. which was its value before the accident. Crow-examined—The horse belonged to witness ; the gig be. longed to plaintiff: Witness is a sheriff's officer, ard plaintiff is his assistant. Re-ezaniined—Tbe gig might be repaired for four guineas. Mr. Sidney, who was in the chaise with the plai^.till; proved the material facts advanced by the first witness. This was the plaintiff's ease. Mr. Sergeant PELL, for the defendant, argued that the plain. tiff's gig had not any business to go out of its proper line, as be would show that there was room for it to have raised between the carriages and the pavement; but this he did not choose to do, on account of the road having been newly gravelled. He thought he had reason to complain of two actions haring been brought; and, as it now turned out, they were liable to a third, because the horse belonged to Selby. The CHIEF JUSTICE here suggested that Selby should agree not to bring his action if, in case a verdict was found for the plain tiff; the 101. damage he had antlered should be included in the vs:. diet of the Jury. This was accordingly agreed to. Mr. Sergeant PELT. then called, John 3lyland, the coachman, who asserted that be was only going at the rate of eight miles an hour, and that there was a carriage before him ; but admitted there was plenty of room be. tween the carriage and the pavement fbr him to have gone. On his cross-examination he sta.' he had only taken a little porta at his dinner, and that the horses had not broke into a gallop once during the whole day. Diana, the list witness', helper, and Fitch, a poet-bey, passing at the time, endeavoured to support the credit of the last witness, but there was a good deal of contradictioa,betseen them. John Richardson, gardener to Lady 'l'aakerville, said, hr thought it was only a smart pace, but be was not able to see u itether the wheel horses g Mr. Sergeant Vauctßaar Pi replied. The Cuter JUSTICE summed up, and the Jur., after a little deliberation, found a verdict for the plaintiff.-I)miages.-60; including the 101. for Selby's horse. SIDNEY, v. THE SAME PARTY. /dr. Sidney, the companion of the last plaintill; brought this actior, and, as the evidence au entirely the same, a serdiet w rs taken by consent-101. CONSISTORY COMIT, WEDNESDAY, Fra. 2. Brii)re Sir CHRISTOPHER RORITIOM, SMYTH SMITH. _ In this case of divorce, brought by Mrs. Smyth against her hus band, by reason of cruelty and adultery, so often reported, the proctor for Mrs. Smith produced six witnesses to be sworn, pie. vious to their being examined before the Surrogate. Mr. Smyth mentioned one of those witnesses by name (O'Con nor), and begged the Judge to take particular notice of him, adding, " fur he is the man on whom all my enmity and adultery tu►n. This strange request caused a laugh through the Court, and an observation from the Judge to desire Mr. Smyth to hold his pewee, and allow the usual forms of t he Court to be proceeded in. Dr. Pun Li MOIL, 011 behalf of Mrs. Smyth, rose to object to some portions of the answers of Mr. Smyth to her libel ; she bad in various tirades charged him with crutity and adultery, in I.IISIIOI to which he said, that his wife was persecuting hint for the purrose of extorting money from hint ; tat she was insane, and that this Court in fact allowed the cause to proceed in the way it was at present being prosecuted, for the proilt of the proctors. These portions the Learned Counsel contended ought to be rejected as extra-articulate and irtelcvant. Sir C. Roar wsox said he had read the answers, end his opinion was such as Dr. Phillimmes ; he had struck out the answers alluded to, and rejected them. Mr. Smyth hoped the Court would not allow any more witnesses to be produced. Sir C. Rom xsow said, the cause must proceed regularly, and he could not allow Mr. Smyth to assume such liberties with the Court. THE OFFICE OP JUDGE PROMOTED ST RUST AND ADDAY9 V. THE REV. Dl. CLAIRE. 7 It will be remembered that this untortunatigentletnan was pro secuted, in 1823, for various offences committed against the Eccle siastical Laws, sod sentenced to be suspended from the exercise of his professional functions and profits for twelve months ; disregard leg this sentence, he refused to give up possession of the church (Much Waltham, in Essex) to the Minister afterwards appointed, and committed various other offences, for which he was further suspended by this Court. A sequestration hail been decreed by this Court of the profits arising from his property, for the purpose of paying the taxed coats incurred by the parish in prosecuting him, to which decree of sequestration a return bad been made of sod) 198 E U.—the costs amounting so 21/91. Ills, od, Dr. SHADE'S', on behalf of the parish officers, said, that Dr. Clarke had bean arrested after he had been pronounced in cos tempt, and he was now in Chelmsford gaol ; what he had to pro- Foie, therefore, was, that if the sum of 1281. 2s. was ordered to he paid out of the Court male parish, they would allow Dr. Clarke .s be t" (thous ' of the r- ~ 'as legal quays, or sufferance elmellt, el illim ist poems the ratans for the wife deck • eggeng= not eII 1 awr y vessel with •be I tisk of injury. Winip, at 4 ,111116. • mpr, ptipper...&c. Ite. cannot be bend rivie ii the quays, and ineocveticin . geljeoductive of grest delay s so of the Hirer Thames, fro Mse, at times, completely obstruct sy additional Wet Docks. incei of the House of Comment 'heir opinion, " That encouragement should be giver Wet Docks, wherever the means can be feu Andhare reported to the House—" Tbs pressed, from the evidence produced, wits that would result, should the sanction of the application for the construction of additi 11 , London." he great advantages which would sea ' of the country, from the improvi • erzrainn of the warehousing system, we t em s petitioners for the Bill last bemicus, and ' • since fully verified. ' yen increase of 41 millions in value of B ported from Greet Britain alone, during of October, 1824. as compared with the By en increase of 1,200,000/. in the transit period, although the improved Watch, effect until the figs July, IMS. By an increase of neatly I.loth in the quant dire imported. LA If INTFLI IGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, WiDxssoAr, Fin. 23. DOW LASS IRON-WORK COAPANY. WATKINS P. lir. SUGDEN raid, he had looked at the minutes delivered to them by the other aide , of what they thought the order of the Court should be, but they seemed to be most material in many parts, -and required more consideration than his (lir. Sugden's) Bide had yet been able to give to them, therefore they had to ask for a week to consider them. Mr. HART hoped the Court would not give the gentlemen on the other side en hour longer ; he did not mean for one moment to say it would be the case but most undoubtedly, in the course of a week, the works might be matt irretript able damaged, and, there fore, the Learned Counsel considered the Court ought not to grant the time asked. His LORDSIIIP thought it was the duty of the Court to take care that the property, in the este in which it was when the case was brought here, should be re-delivered to the plaintiff. the sale having been rescinded. At the same time, it was highly necessary to take great care that justice should be done to those who had been confirmed the purchasers of the works and property: the order, therefore, at present, which he conceived right to make, was, that the order, whereby Mr. Bayley was confirmed as the purchaser, should be set aside—that re-possession should be given —old, upon the re-delivery, that the sum of 72.160/. (he amount of the pus. chase) should be repaid to Mr. Bayley, and that this order should not be delivered out till next Tuesday. the parties undertaking that no alteration of the works, &c. should in the mean time be made. On Tuesday his Lordship would hear the parties upon the manner in which the accounts will be taken, how compensation shall be made, whether the property shall be delivered to Messrs Maule, Kaye, and Llewellyn, or to 31 mars 31aule and Kaye only ; and how the parties shall proceed to a new sale, &c. IN TB/ MATTER OP ARCANGCLO. A BANKRUPT. MT. MONTAGU prayed for judgment in this matter, upon the validity of the cotntriisaion, leaving the question of costs foe further consideration. tlr. Roasts applied for the opinion of the Court on all the ques tions involved in the matter. His boanssuP considered that in many eases it might be nee. airy to give judgment on part of the eases, where judgment on the °tiltr parts might not press so much ; on the present occasion he would order the commission to be superseded, and decide the question of costs on Itlorday. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, WIDNILSDAY, FEB. 23. [Siftingt in London, before the Cater JUSTICE and Common Jw-tes. ntrateow r. troeL. Th's was an ection to recover damages upon a breach of warranty, on the sale of a certain quantity of seed by the defeat:Lint to tin plaintiff. The facts of the case appeared by the evidence to be these:— The plaintiff, Mr. Dickson. who is a respectable farmer,living in the neighbourhood of Blackheath, sent his servant with a printed ticket to the defendant, who is a rem and sebd merchant, and who keeps a stall in the corn-market, at Mark-lane, for a quantity of spring tares, amounting to 71. lffs. The defendant's brother showed him 20 quarters of tares, some of which were spring and some winter tare', and told him to take his choice. The man took part of the winter, later but without being aware of the mistake. The brother of the defendant then gave him a sale ticket as for spring tarn , . A few days after, Mr. Dickson saw the defendant, and told him that there was some doubt whether his man had brought the right seed, and wished to know whether it was so or not; the acre'''. dant said he did not know. but would ascertain. On the following day he learned that part of the seed was winter instead of spring seed, and he immediately wrote to the plaintiff to acquaint him with the mistake, and offered to exchahge them; but the p!iiirtiff had already sown the seed. The consequence was, that in the month of November the tares from the winter seed had grown hut a few inches and then rotted at the roots; whereas the spring reel had sprung up several inches and was most healthy. Mr. GI; ewer contended, that the defendant had violated his contract, which was clearly proved by the production of the market ticket, signed and delivered by his brother to the plaintiff's servant, and that the plaintiff was therefore entitled to the damages he bad sustained in consequence of the failure of his crop. He then callect the plaintiff's bailiff, who said that he considered that if the tares had been spring tares the crop would bare been worth 81. an acre. _ It was contended by Mr. Scani.erv, on the pan of the defen. dent, that the plaintiff was informed of the mistake in sufficient time to have had it corrected, but that the plaintiffdeclined having it done, because he wished to make an experiment to ascertain wt *ter winter seed, being town so early, would suceezd to a good crop. The Learned Gentleman alto called witnesses to prove that the plaintiff had, in a conversation, consented to we're his right of action against rite defendant. saying, that he was only trying an experiment ; that he 'had already had a gond crop of potatoes off the land, and that he should not take advantnge of him (defendant). The Loan Cuer Juirr ICE said, that the market ticket, and the letter of the defendant to the plaintiff, clearly showed that a mama bad been made for the sale of spring tares, andltnit a breath of that contract had also been committed by tie delivery of winter tares instead. The only questions then for the Jury to con sider sere—first, whether the plainntr had sutsegoently consented to dispense whit the contract, and if so, what were the damages he had sustained ? lie thought the evidence to prove the conversations between the plaintiff* and defendant was not very satisfactery ; therefore if, es in his judgment they must, the Jury gave their ver dict for the plaintiff, they had only then to ascertain the amount of damages. In making thc.r (adulate, they would consider the difference of value between a full crop and the partial crop obtained by the plaintiff, and add to it the sum paid by him for the winter seed, which he, of course was entitled to. The Jury consulted a short time, and returned a verdict for the the plaintiff.—Daniages 20/. LAMBERT V.DALLTMORI. This was an action to recover the value of a portmanteau and its contents, which Mul been sent by the van belonging to the de fendant, who is a common currier, and lost on its way from London to Bristol. The facts proved in evidence were, that the plaintiff booked the portmanteau, containing jewels and plate, and some policies of insurance, to be sent to Bristol ; that the same was taken by the defendant's van as tar as Mai lenhead, where it arrived about one o'clock at night. A guard went with the van to that place. They there took out several parecla, and when the ern was about to pro. reed, it was discovered that the porunanteau in question hal been taken away. Application WAS soon after made at the defer.dant's office in town for compensation. The defendant requested time until he could make inquiries in the neighbouthcwd of Maidenhead. This was ittebted, but Lo intelligence having been obtained respect ing the portmanteau. and the defendant relining to pay the plain tiff and his wife and daughter the value of the articles which be longed to them, and were contained in the portmanteau, the present and two other actions had been brought. It had been subsequently ascertained that the pertuanteau was found in the neighbourhood of !Maidenhead, but emptied of the articles in question. The defence set up was, that a notice was set up in a conspicuous I part of the defendant's office, that the defendant would not be liable for any parcels sent by his vans above the value of bd., unless entered, and an insurance paid specifically for a higher value. Two witnesses were called, who stated, that they saw the plaintiff read the notice; but this was contradicted on the part of the plaintiff's witnesses, by their showing,that the notice, instead of being to a conspicuous part of the office, was not above two feet from the ground, and in such a situation that it was not likely to be seen by any one, unless previously pointed out to him. The LOUD CHzElr J uterine, in summing up, said, it seemed very extraordinary that the two witnesses on the part of the defence, should have so particularly noticed the plaintiff's reading the notice, when it was considered how manylpersons were going in and out of the office every day. The Jury had to determine what weight their testimony was entitled to : but, unless they believed that the plaintiff sett:ally had notice of the terms stated by the de fendant. he would be entitled to their verdict ; as it hod been al ready decided that a general notice was not sufficient to protect public vans from the conimon 14w of liability they incurred by un dertaking to convey the property of others from one place to ano. timer for • profit. As to the three actions being brought at the same time, his Lordship could not see any impropriety in that, because .it was impossible that any one of the parties could prove die value of the articles belonging to either of the others. The Jury consul: 4d together, and found a verdict foc the pin n tiff—Damages 67i. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, WEDNESDAY, Fri. 23. gull iind pan Si A Id Tow to p d emp coo relic allot pare at th Els I ;,)osi liC, far t 1 the .; Am:, City /I ) . J. C J. F, C.l J. B A. A T i ll Eue D.cr. T. 1, T. Thai 'IV. I us "sou out In toe t..ourt tome tartan me wouta 'How Ur. Clark* V i W. I „ , en 31.1 ing Old Bailey Sessions. Bybee the CHUM JiitariCi mid a Commis Jere. to be liberated without the payment of the remaining sum ; more W.,: iesrot, MOW& even the fidlowing brief statement or a The Bev W A/Wield extwevsed his astonishment that HARD DRIVING. allempt at murder which took place here on e _ - e ____ --- • ~• - utmost The parties were then bound over to prosecute. particularly, as he hawing at last been got out of the parish, it was 1 A. I • Credal auki not have interfered when he beard the blows . At shout ten o'clock on the above sight, as tr 7 •'' ''"-- - , - e OLASSE V. GRAY, TEE YOUNGER. not likely he would trouble them any further. 1 R. j Wt. Jelin Sweet s eldest tiori of Charles :,'.mart, Es 9. Quartermetta gteen, and hweeprevented the murderous design from b e i ng carried house, too accede& h is, eiwitinued the Rev. Divine, the duty of every POLICE. Mr. Banuom.ed opened the pleadings. and Mr. Servant Dr. LuartiNGYON supported the application. ..............- VAUGHAN stated the case to the Jury. The plainti ff brought this Sir C. RonISSOW doubted whether he had the power of ordering .1.1 Intem ar tbc ds % e V hcai 4tarrard ee of Staff; B e o l ;d reti lei ru ttle n le h e agn wto e vet t i o , w h h is ere fat h h : r i:a n dr; t t. a .lait to prevent the sacithee of a fellow-creature, and had the win nest Eons fbrward, it would have prevented the horrid deed. it MANSION HOUSE. actionagsing the defendant, who was the proprietor of the ()attends that sum to be given out of the Court to the parish officers. He s eel ; she evening, be was waylaid, knocked down, and stabbed with a Cox a. KLAN . —ltintcYstENY Yon REAJUZY.—Yesterday, and Weybridge mach, to recover compensation in damages on would be glad if any precedent were produced. att. i ilatifti in several puts of the body, by a set of ruriaus who bad was truti diegusting and revolting to human estere, to hear that • after the ordinary business of the Justice-toom wet concluded, account of injurim he had sustained, under the following curves. Dr. LIISHINGTOB said, he thought that the money was is the J a t . i roan was ksteeing to the discourse of three murderers, tad Daniel Maley, who gave evidence in the cause of " Cox v . Kean," stances :—The plaintiff was, on the 12th November last, coming power of theDishop and Court. /evidently fanned a paeoncerted plan to take away his life. After -1. 1, didnot, by hie tnnoly w i a.ance, mar their well-concarted plan. leaving jells Lloyd s, Le was proceeding home slag Little New- . was brought up in custody, for the purpose of giving bail to from K n i g h ts bridge towards London, at about four o'clock in the Sir C. ROBINSON said, this was only a partial sequestration, J. a town by the Fever Hospital, and had just reached the moat slithery Mr. ecilliarn Hayward, jun. of Aylesbury, said, he examined answer a charge of perjury made against him by Alderman Cox. afternoon, in a single horse chaise, driving at a temperate paw on and not a general one. Jo se ; pa ß ei • t h at m a t a l as t oo Wm's, with tear faces leackesed and the heal' of the decease .., and (wad a lacerated woun;! on the Henley is : a old man in some menial occupation /shout Drury. his proper aide of the rend- At Hyde Park-coma there are two Dr. Leant NOTON then said, if the Court would allow the case G mailed up. leapt over a wall, and rushed a: him ttstatsddesly that bail , part of the head. The skell Was r ed , fractu and t e wound Ise.* theatre. Ile was called upon for the defence it; the above- gates, one for carriages coming to London, and the other tor those to stand ova until next Term, perhaps some arrangement might It. R 11• hail little time to make any defence. Ore of t ern in a few winh he described produced death. There was nark on the back mentioned action, and he deposed to what, if the Jury had given going from. Now, whether it happened that the defendant's coach- be effected. •1' sigmas struck him a dread el blow with a ,navy stick, which part of the neck, either from a heavy list or some bludgeon. The reedit to him, would have materially affected the case of the plain. man was rather behind his time, or from a spirit of rivalry with This was acceded to by the Court. 11 brOeght hire down. Re was then struck repeatedly, anal at length neck was much swollen. tiff. He swore that, in May or June, 1834, he saw Alderman Cox some other coach. be did not come through his proper gate, but ule fi m a r e with a knife—the cowardly and detestable ruffians !flakier William Rates, who resides near Allen's haunt, gave a 91021 19, said his wife walking together, between eleven and tnelve o'clock west through, at a furious rate, oe that side of the road which he Iti. - AIekETS. •B. sae of the following, and like expressions, whilst engaged in their gate-recut to that of Thorn. Ha heard the woman's voice when re- in the day-time, in St. - Martin's-lane ; that Mrs. Cox had a veil ought to have avoided. Now this, in the month of November, --anew— Ifs, savage and ene r s tee t ess work -.." I.) you, we'll have the Proms- parting the wards, " Dann., John , strike him." Ile was sure it upon her, but whether it was "dinette black the witness could not when dusk soon came on, was particularly wrong, and he ought to CORN EXCHANGE FEB. 23. V. 1 Mg gets f ' Raving ailensta, as they thought, aocom- was Jel i n Ail ee n w ir e , as h e k een e a vane t collier es a re. tell ; and that he knew the Alderman and his wife from having have taken additions! care against coming in contact with any other We have lad but few arrivals of any G res in since Monday. FIBS be yillaMadMeer lie •e- , they lad, Leaving Mr. Smart on the road, latiun of Lis. but he did not recollect hearing voioe; William seen them frequently pass into the theatre. vehicle. Now the plaintiff, his (Mr. Sergeant Vaughan's) client, samples of Wheat sold very readily this morning on full as good lid sowed with weasels and blood. Mr. Smart, however, in ft::: Reeves spoke, Lut he could not hear what he said. A bill of indictment was preferred fof this evidence before the could not possibly hare been in a better situation than he was. tams as last day ;we had also more inquiry after middhas mad I Se ema neof anise time, was abfe to get up, and, though with great Joseph Jletinan identified the rail produced to be his property, Greed Jury and found, and a wirrant was hatted front Mr. Shel- A witness would e called wh ir o ec ia tto w n w o i f th o h e errer otin t t h i e r toe s g c i h e . I" Tl f i a e l ;e r ley to-day, a d y c . wri bu P t ti nO m inm l rotai r' e w n a t s in a r s e l d ined ial an e d r° i r r.f fi e n r e ior M sor alti ts. li C a o a r r i-1 . en , ildllealey, to mehe MI Way b o ok to m iss D er v,. w h ere li e now and stolen ham the fora opposite his house on Saturday night, ton's office, for the apprehensior. of Dariel Henley , . who traversed drive at full speed in the d till next !sessions. Mr. Henley entered inm recognizanees In the was reason to believe that the coachman had taken more liquor dderable sales of Oats were effected this morning, at a trifling ad. ev. Bet . Elts km etenseled Dr. Arlo rt e , from whom we are happy but retied sot tell what time. sum of 801. to appear at the next General Sessions a t t h e Dm th an he ought to have done, which might account in some measure erect' on alonday's quo.ations. In Beans, Pease, or other articles, el m se leant, ,bat hie crow thengh severe, are not ;hi:genius. Two „ our Joseph Foaket described a. quarrel which took place at the New produced two gentlemen, who, we believe, belong to fur his conduct. The consequence was, that the stage-coach ran no variation. were Ahmed se die - ,eta! in the shoulder, and one oar the . T kßell, A cton Clinton, between the parties, when Morris obeerved B atley , and seeople. We have if weave than one cause wisignel for this ft was too bad to take a man in , the same Mange, as his burettes , each in the sum of 401, right against the frailgig, upset it, dangerously wounded the horse, ail ave in the following mimes and addresses :—James and thre• the plaintiff and a gentleman who WAS with him headlong COAL MA RKET, Rent 21, . f brew e u tei s gee bet we s hall forbear to state any, conedently an-. w^" e• that respecting a horse he (Allen) bud mid to a man named Ballard. Allen raid he had no Covent -garden. Gent. ; William into the middle of the road. The plaintiff was carried to Sit Ships et marker- . seaPr SOIL thawing that the matter will be elegantly taken up by our local Winston 150. 3, Charles-street Prim. stitherhtee _ otet ee ample eeeesed will be offered fa , the dta , te , e , y right ta intiweire-, and offend to lied him. Doan. Nice See, Chaelette-street s Le d ford - square , Gent. Mr. Hen- George's hospital, where he had his wounds dressed. A surgeon 444 Newenstle . . erg . - egs fed t o pie oa attended on him afterwards foe upward , of a fortnight. He ulti- ffe Sunderland -, 9} - 110. lid to 40. id Su a . the 199 % 99,99 , sad Mat the perttrators of this atrocity will The clothes of the prisoners were produced b y Collins, the turn- ley, alr. Winston, and Mr. Dean then left the Justice- roost. mately recovered, and row sought for thore damages which the ----- - -------- ' --------- ----------"--' k yet be detested. Mr. Smart is a line, aPifala man, of key. Tam WWII spots of blood on the guock-frocks of Collier and the Moon ea t e a ct s . a b out e i g h teen yaws o il 0 gr0„... 611 11,1 2 .11 N d Reeve, but nests on that of Allen. Collier accounted for the Mr. I'. Flower, late Treasurer of the Turnpike Trust justice of tbe case required ; and the Learned Sergeant trusted that 111011 WATER THIS DAY AT LONDON BRIDGE. rS Malt larks ea hie uptick from his having assisted to carry the deceased the Jury would twirls theirs who had the care of the lives of his !Be. Morning * min. after S. I Afternotre 0 min. after 6. 1:r- - ----- - --,-----e- =-- --rek Kr. Wad's ratermting lectures will continence at the The prisoners offered clothing in their defeoce and they were at the Seetereet Agehtee. an a charge of forgely ihe Wai manner so es not to endanger t!.:111. He would Low leave the case Printed at THE BRITISH PILES); Office.lay J W easereag i , . . •in the hands of the Jury, not doubting Lett they would give the due • 181, Strand, and published by A. Quigwit, same rime. Abe. 001.08 t laws # I 1117/1 days. fully coMelltled to take thelr vial fee as unwire. virrested at Antwerp. . ..., I • i 1 f ; r ii ii • • ii II h 1 r A • lc I Pt 3 Ha Fir' Jaa Sal Ve this mot ting and