The Statesman. — London, England, 1810-03-03 00:00:00

• . :.1 they not availed themselves of thalreat resources of the country to engage in an enterprise of the magnitude and importance of the Expedition to Vie Scheldt, they might justly have been charac terised as fit andhereditary successors to all tho torpor and iwb icility of their predecessors in . nice. Xarl GREY expressed his astonishment that tha W.,hla Earl should anticipate any satisfaction from the result of an Inquiry into an . Expedition so completely disgraceful, so extensively calamitous as the Expedition to the Scheldt, an Expedition by, which the national honour had been degraded, and which had converted almost every house in the country into " a house of mourning." The No. ble Earl (Liverpool) had declared that the Expe dition had failed in consequence of a departure from the original plan. Why then advise his Ma. josty to tell the City of London that no inquiry was necessary, when, if there ever be a ground for an inquiry into the conduct of any enterprise, a de. parture from the original plan upon which the ea. tcrprise was undertaken must be that ground ?---r The Noblellarl had then stated the difficulty of, instituting an inquiry its a case la which the mill. tary and naval services were combined ; and in which different Courts mast necessarily be resort. ed to, To this objection he could allow no vali dity whatever. If nn the face of the original dis p‘tchea the utmost culpability had been apparent, he would ask. the Noble Earl whether an iuqiiiry • would not hair, been imperiously demanded, not. withstanding its having been a joint service.— " Bat," sail the Noble Earl, ' 6 the dispatches themselves did nut contain any thing to warrant an inquiry." The Noble Earl had, however, very. dexterously omitted to notice the bearing of the narrative of the Earl of Chatham on the subject— s bearing, the force of .which had been se ably il lustrated by his Noble Friend near him, that be conld not repeat his arguments to the House. Lord MULGRAVE entered into an able do. fence of the conduct of Sir Richard Strachdn, which be considered as wholly free from the slightest possibility - of imputation. lie bad been induced to give the advice which he had given to his Majesty on the subject of the Answer to the. Address of the City of London by the conviction —a conviction impressed on his mind by a must at. tentive perusal of the dispatches, and which no. thing had since occurred- to alter, that •no blame, was imputable to either of the Commanders for the result of the Expedition. He declared not - only that he had never seen or heard of Lord Chatham's surative until February 24, but that he had ne ver conceived the possibility of the existence of such a document. He would admit, that had he seen the narrative before the Address of the City of Loudon was presented, be might have advised , his Majesty to give so far a different answer, as to _ declare that the result of the Expedition was in a state of inquiry; for although he ieinceived that le the original dispatches would be fumer a corn . pleteatiswir tb the imputations (far they did not emount to oloarges)roniained in the narrative, yet be thooseht• it would have been but justice to the ...gallant Admiral to retptire from him a counter statement. It was this sense of justice to Sir R. Urethan, which had imluced him, immediately on his having !seen made acquainted with the existence of Lord Chatham's narrative (even before he bad himself read it), to apprise Sir R. Strachen of the circumstance, although the rapidity( with which the narrative was moved fur, amid produced in the , _House of Commons, would not permit him to send a copy of it to the gallant Admiral. Adverting to Sir Richard Straelian's• Letter, bracing the date of the 27th of August, he de _clued, that in his opinion it by no means boils the .characte: of accusation of the military department of the expedition with. which it had been charged. it simply declared-the readiness of the navy to proceed ; at the tante time allowing that the ques ,tion of procedure was purely a mllitaryone. He . would repeat what be had said on the first day of the Session, that in his opinion the want of suc cess was not attributable to any one. It chiefly arose from the adverse winds and unfavourable .weather, causes over which it was impossible to .steititain any .cont reel. Ile declared the anxiety which he always felt to maintain the character of the.gallent officers in that department of the ser- Nice. user which he had the honour to preside; and he confessed that the narrative of Lord Chatham ,(the presentation of which to his Majesty was certainty spa-irregular proceeding) had created to him a personal inconvenience, by putting him-on bid defence to the brave and distinguished officer ho bad the command of the naval brancleof the Nepedition, and by putting bins an his defence to that house. Not conceiving, however, that the Noble Marquis bid urged any just grounds for ilia motion, ho should give it his decided nega tive. w. Tho E. ,T of DARI4LEr declared he could no: ys speak ;of lbw disgraceful Expedition to the Schelde, but with indignation, sorrow, and dig_ gust ; tlsrei *aught , that nothing abort of the rer, moral of tits prqsaitt. Ministers could rescue the country from diem and disaster, or Cave it from even tua I. destwaction.- Lori, (OLEN VILLE was glad to hear the able defence made by the Noble Lord (Mulgrave) in behalf of thet gallant Admiral, Sir.ltichard Sere, clean, upon whom so match blame had been cast by the Noble General. Ceribialy in that defence; the Noble Lord acted but rightly ; and indeed it would hue been impossible fur any man, filling such a situetioa as he did, .nut to bit tuitions that' the honour and the unsullied. elseracted ad the ;levy should escape unjust imputatios: .Nu men, he believed, could possibly entertain any doubt tw o!' the subject, that, with this Narrative•orpouno. nicatad to him, it was not necessary to go into inquiry, in order to ascertain whether. or . 11 . 0 t the charges of shame imputed to the Gallant' Ad m i r al and the Navy were well feuded. Is :us opinion the Noble Lord seemed to center, it , laeot opposition to the Noble Secretary of Stitt. Safe he was Olt it would be quite impossibloOur /IN Noble Secretary of State to recommend his `NFriesty to give the iloswer be did to the City of j els a y:ou tf be bad beets aware of the contents of tap Gegread.s narrative. He blamed Mi..) Ili pfrn Oelottnitted 'vino impart , be. :Zip ... .~ . • , THE sTATg fore they were acquainted. with tba stall merits of the case ; ♦nd as Lord Chatham me thought pro.: per to accuse the gallant Admiral car his Narra tive,, the latter ought at least to have been called upon to give in-a Narrative of his proceedings also. HiaLordship then adverted to spinster the circum stances of the Expedition, and observed, that if blame attached not to the Officers, the responsi. bilityeaust of course lay at the doer of the nisters, Leaving this part of the subject, there remained one of still greater importance to the country, in a constitutional• point of sic*, than any that had yet been considered. He alluded ty the illegal and unconstitutional. conduct of Lord Chatham in poisoning the Royal oar against those who were conjointly employed with him in the public service. This was cooduck he execrated . as subversive of the best attribute* or the Consti tution...as tending to introduce $ system of dou ble Government in 'O4 country, by which one set of men would be put forwardes the ostensible Mi nisters of the. King, whilst another set really pus. sawed the confidencerd the Throne,' were in_ pos. session of theßoyal ear,, and in fact were greater than the l i hrone itself. His lordship concluded by expressing a wish to hare some official commu— nication how it' happened that the King had been ;edvised to give an answer to thc City' of London directly contrary to that he u►uot hare gi•un i had ! the existence of • the 'paper now before the House been known to hie adviser*. Thu question las then put, when a division took 'place,' ants the numbers stood thus Contents, 41—Pro‘ies, 49—Totad, 9J ,Noa-contents. 70—Proties, 66—Total, 1% • Majority against the Moduli— Adjourned at Twelve oiCieck, .7meeesi HOUSE OF co:yap:im, limiest 2. • • A new Writ Was isni . ed fur the borough of Woodstock, in the room of the Hon. William Elliot Eden, deceased. • i t eaye was given to Alarmism curds to afieg iu a Bill fbr erecting a market for the sale of Public Stock. • Upon the motion of Sir 'Thomas Turtoo, leave Was grant ed to bring in v. Bill to enable Mr. Ellistou and other pro prietors, to bring forward certain performances at the Royal Cirrus. Lord COCHRANE moved, that the oaths administered ti , the lesabers, Judge Advocate, and wibiesses at Courts Mar tial, should be petard. The SPEAK Eft stated, thin he wished to acquaint the No ble Lord, that when any puhlic document moved fur, was al ready before the Home,eitber in au iodated form, or as a constituent part of the statute l f ats, it was evil the practise to move for their re-production. Lord COCHKA.NE stated, that it was imperative upon those who coqtended that such ductlitseista were iuserted in the acts of Parliament, to point out the part of the Statutes 10 which such hasertino wits. • After some observations from Mr. Secretary Ryder, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Mc, Miley, and Mr. Cro , is which the latter stated, that the two Oaths, alluded to, were to be found in the 4Sd of George 111. the inotluo was negatived, Sir EDWARD KNATCHRULL presented a Petkittri from the Innkeepers of the 6mm) , of Kent, prayillg relief from certain ermvuoces from tile present system of billeting soldiers. Geotral FERGUSSON presentee a Petitinu front the Linea and Cotton Bleachers of the County of Fife, praying the cominqauce of site Drawbacks upon the Duties for im porting Soap and Brimstotie into Scotland (ts lam;l1.) The 'Gallant General, at ith the utnuist Pleiviontri • kg/led to as sure the Home, that tiotwithstanding the laugh excited, the petkioners had um other want for tfte articles alluded to in the petition, save* as they were accessary to the CKflyitig on of their trade [a laug.4.] TIM Fetitloss wastwderini to be ea the Table. • '' THE EARL OF• CHATHAM.. Mr. WHITBH,EAD, its pursuance of his pre. *ions nutice, rose, and spoke to the folluwiug ilect :...Mr. Speaker, but leven days hase 'elapsed Since I felt it tote my duty to salsosit to the con. pideration of this House a certain proposition, Ibunded upon a strong and iattlitable suspicion, "that a conduct most enconstittoional and itapro. ...per had been pursued by a Noble ,Lord, at this 'moment a Mesntser of the King's Cabinet, And the . late - Coingsander in Chief of the Ealicilition to the Scheldt. 4 then contended t that it was outshine - the right, bet that it became the incumbent duty of this House to call fur all decliments sad papinw touching the 'lnlairy In which it was anglified, which it had reason to beliere were in the posses. lifon of the Crown, and Most particularly if they shad been communicated •in a way must likeky to 'unite its constitutional vigilance and jeslouty.-- , illear! hear!) I had the proud satisfaction to and, 'hat upon that occasion my efforts were.sucepas/pl. For, to the immortal'hunour of this House let it be Spoken, .that to the Address which it thou agreed to have conveyed to the Crown, an answer .has been since returned ) fully justifying tho course it then found it necessary to adopt, anti tstp strongly Illustrating the suspicion it then entertained. 1 say that my efforts were succesaful in the fairest extent of the exprefsion ; for most sincerely do I. cousi_ der the decision of that night' as forming a proud political mra in the history of this empire—ante:a at which, in distant tisnes, posterity will Look back at as a great constitutional precedent. Have I not also reason to think those efforts successful in an uncircumscribed Measure, when I . recollect that auchAccision wait obtained in despite of all the wer.aud..pacutasiatm of -ths-Alioisorl- ' tifear I hear!)—whose conduct upon this occasion I Peg 'this !abase partieafarly to retrace ind Amnia's... ,119 "When tine Noble Lord (Chatham), ullow. i whose* . • conduct I 'felt it my duty. ; to animadvert, was it the bar of this House, end wilts, it was en. deaveured to eitiact from him a plain answer. 'to certain direct questiens, it was asserted by, them, that in consideration Of the rank and, privileges 4 that Nobtentassi we had no right teS, press him. In answer, it was contended by us e; that in this House there existed a right to extract from any itulividual the Melt evidence upon pub,, lic transactions ; that tight we considered .itulis. potable, at the same time admittiog.that the,.camm. for its extreme exe r cis e , w e r e 'ram, ,What pee . did Ministers propose ? Wh a t li ne pt proceeding, did they ; 'in an affected Candour . , 'i s ecousßentti, They told ea that there has an easy, wyst to '44 Fate ourselves from the jililculty. liat way, Oaf, .Mated, was by in Address tolhe crown, calliwg fri . kcath documents as we supposed .to have 'bed; 41ititired ; and, in Order to coins.- us. .IPPre '-abserfilly iti pursue their recoMmendetioo„ illy ; ;JesiSt so of an answer most propitious to one obtbsige:lipcji was their reconimendition ; nom • ani*llstrzontrast which their subsequent essmlACl 41whillIthi - Vieor, hear !T Wien this yery Askireel, , was. • , Wish they thenlielfes first *venni, to nit, d o (bey Si! apron it f No; They purtooe com e act qu it e ieieavisceat with their profeasious ; 411eren t leavour to *MVO by every exertion within MAN. the grasp of 'their ineffectual power. [near, hear!] , Why do I mention this fact ? I mention ii, that this Houses should recollect it amongst the long entuneritiou of similar measures of this Ad. ministration: [Hear , hear !] To return to the immediate object of my present motion—sce now know, from evidence unquestionable, that John, Eat] of Chatham,'_ in a mast unconstitutiutial and clandestine manner, as a minion and a fasouritii, has abused the Royal confidence, at the same time, and by the seine act, that he has violated the most sacred principles of the Constitution. [Mar, . hear f] This knowledge, I say, -we are pos. sessed of from undeniable evidence; and it vier becomes this House to take the earliest oppor tunity of doeitliog upon that evidence,- and of expressing, by .its recorded resolutions, its high reer4hatioit and indignation at such pa occedings. , Had it indeed been al ordinary Member who had been thus guilty ; had it . . been an iudividual , unprotected by the privileges of elevated rank, i there would in such circumstances be cm neces sity for the present motion. The case would have been long ego decided; the indignation of this House would have been befere this time rented • upon the offending individual. [near, hear n Am I stating any thing In which the exemioatiett of the Noblo Lord does nut fully warrant me ? I or confident that I aos not. Compare the exetninatiois •of Lord"-Chatham . , lei the 12(1 of February, with his examination on the 27th of the saute month ; first with one another, and then witk the answer, which his Majesty has heels .plemed I to give to your Address; and' shall not thin House act upon that paramount principle, that equal justice ought to be administered„ and that the higher the situation of the offender, the greater should be its indignation and its censure ? [(fear ! hear o .] But the individual in this iu. stance is a Peer, invested with all the privileges of that exalted rank; still it is the right and the duty of every Member of this House, to observe upon -Misconduct ; that duty, I feel myself impe riously called apes, to perform. I find then, that John Earl of Chatham, the late Commander in Chief or tile F, l )editk o o to the Scheldt, did, is it 'lout !any consultation with his colleagues its the Cabinet, as I most truly believe— withoet intimating fps ill ' tention to his brother officer who commanded the 114- val force tspois that Expedition, and. wholly un known, aave to the'Royal Personage, whose con fidence he has abused, did communicate to that Personage a Narrative of his Proceedings oft that Ex-pedition, su far back as the 15th of January last. I find that it lay in the possession of that • Personage, wrapped up its the most impenetrable secrecy—a secrecy desired by him who presented it, until the 14th of February last. At least, it remain. ed wholly undisturbed until the 7th of that month, when, fur reasons es yet only known to the Earl of Chatham, it was requested•of the Alue to return it to him for correction. I say, reasons as yet only known to that Noble lord, fur i am - sure there is•: 1 no min who can deny that there:none-since stated by him are su inconsistent and contradictory'; that it is impossible to amine that ire are acquainted with Isis real motives. [ileterr hear! hear!]- 4 -, On that day thu Noble Liard applied . to have the document returned to hits, fur thn purpose of alteration. His request was acquiesced in ; and what was the alteration which he himself has told • you took place? lie told you that it consisted in 1 the omission of a paragraph, containing an opi nion-.:-an opinion, observe—yet when soficitod to state the nature of that opinion, he dixtarce , his inability to communicate that most necea.• I sary information. pear! Heart.] His exam ination proceeds; and the Noble Lord is asked, when this narrative, so altered, was again present ed to bis Majesty? Meek his answer: He states, thatit was tendered by hint to his Sovereign upon the 14th of February. Struck with the 'pectilia. rity of the term (endereil l I myself immediately asked the Noble Lord, what he invent by the ex. prissioe he .had thus used, and whether the narra. tive upon that day had actually passed into his Majesty's heeds? To this his reply was—that it had not. Hero then was a paper presented upon the 15th of January last, conveying at least twelve direct charges against the gallant Naval Officer who consmanded, with an opinion of the Noble Lin'd'a affixed. An opleion ! 4nd am I out, bound to presume, that such opinion, so corn. mtsnicated, now not eitcollected, by the No. ble Lord, went to. inculpate the Naval Of f icer against whom this very narrative, now revised, contains, as I before stated, twelve direct charges of misconduct ? [ Hear, hear I] The 'louse will 'recollect, that this narrative in the shape originally presented, with an opinion affixed, was for twenty. five days in the hands of his Majesty—that there did not since occur any conference, any l'atraetion that even In its ementled,or rathedts alteated forpe,-, it teas 'to ilie ihig.:-:th --it it was not ad mitted to that Royal Personage, to say to the Noble Lord, I find your Lordship haechaeged lone narrative, have you also changed your opi nion ? [Loud eries.ef hur l , hear !]* Is nut this an offence of the most.aggravated nature against the first principles of our Constitutioe ? Is it not an offence, that if suffered to escape without the re corded animadversion of this House, is pregnant with the most incalculable evils ? [Bear; hear !] Look at the period, when the House of Commons is called to exercise its duty upon such transac tions. IV° are now approaching the close of a I long reign —the reign of a Monarch, who, above all others, has lived in the hearts and affections of his people.. [/tear, - hear !] But as a Monarch Wells peculiar virtues, so has every reign its cha. ,r4CterjbliC futures. Most truly can we say of the revered Sovereign of these realms, that his virtues are his own, • and that whatever evils have occurred, they are to be attributed to the servants who have been in the enjoyment of his confidence, [Hear, hear q . What then has been the characteristic /emote of this reign ? kne we not been wilt, by authorities 'the must entitled to veracity attd cuefidente, that froM its Commencement atm has exiated•a secret, tnysteri ous, and ustcoustitetional Willows', which has set' at uoiaght that responstLility which the Uonstitu. (ion demands front the mitiiiirt• of- the Como ?. [Mar l 4ear I .] 114 s not such it communioatien beep made wills's' the walla of this !.!upse t by his Mb b el what W( Ise I CO' pare his lion °" coalmen be con tt arc CO w d i s h or to imp " ble 14 ' r [flear yea r , that i° to prouccd who h a d carried the reputation o f this Trot t the zenith of its glory—by him,' who, h o ":' sallied dad exalted patriotism, had 1 " .1 ectig ired title superior to what united Kings e ~L , ' stow, namely, that of the first t ww ,, h ° o - England ; I mean him, afterward s liana, Earl of Chatham ? [hear, hear ii i ii e . n ' and oat of power, in favour and in ilisgrac;"tol aver to be venerated Statesman felt the im;.: ialuence of this secret and monstrous cow " which, as lie deciared,lesisted behind the taus" *lid was greater thou the Throe° itst•lf i t : not published it in thusu speeches, thick 1 w auth o rity to consider as his own ? _ wmi yet wel" 1 times, when. fur the very sam e declaration, b .: ' actually sit ffering in your ga o l s . [hear! h car if 1 ; if its esistufice was heretofore problewati," have it now before us unmask e d an d unravel-I'y" Strange fatality ! that in the son of that Very of ''! first made the bold and awful annunciati on . 4414 ' 1 one of thetagents of that occult ;on o '' 7' . taco it h, r i father so long deprecated and so long resist e d. r hear !) Long has that fatal influence her„ s . ceesful in the accomplishment or its otischiefi I have been the past efforts to resist or t o el ., Though curtain its the realization. of its s•,, disappeared before it was detected. 11) 1 were the iistinsaile servants of the Crowe ; ever. groat atitd satutari ,( fit principl es o f th cir . . licy,' . or the 4blectis a -their ailatinistr4tiou, labours Were counteracted ; their jest ow ed disappointed. flowerer incess'aitt the lull to, the 'web, hi one night, •looe* hoar, this tc, • power was unable to unravel it. it Hu the deal:lug Gildin saeat • To earn his crearn7bow I duly de. - When ia one ni4lll, ere c, r , of morn% His •Inulowi , flail had thresh d the cor a That ten day labiinrers could not end ; And blrei c h 'd no a!I the einutaney's leueb, Basks sit the tart his 'miry strength, • And ern" nut of cloors'he nia,o 4 • 'Lie the first cock his tootle rings, That his. Majesty is not in aordegree t 2 Idris, am ready to admit, and that OS sacred f re li np a . nut violated by the course which 1 I►repth4, n hat I also contend. •If hi s honour arid Nall' tests have been too long sacrificed to such yam stitlitional influence, it is right that his (Tes s be now opened—opened at th e moment wh it Power is detected in its criminal iiilluelice. it right that Parliament should declare, that 1 Constitution of .this Country n ever w i l l ad i at any other advisers but those elio are I avowed, ostensible, anti responsiLla San of the Crown. pear ! heat :j . The Ifs of Commons, now that it ,has elposed to view. the exercise of this influence, Shout,' Care, lay the 11141kreStallOt1 of its ital to warts others from 4 similar course in fat, [Mar ! hear !] - Bat, in the reknit iestaner; the danger of such an offence limited in a aci abztract violation of tbe Constitution? . Is it., simple gin, out a g gravat e d by th e conseqemets a any actual coil ? See' what the Noble Lent b done, and mend yen!. thoughts to what * have peobahly' been be toissigamme, rilll conduct. Gould he have de v is e d a n ,ai likely to produettAissensiests between the ill and ',Si.a wa I Service, and all Oak. hi l t ltdelirideal evils to which such a calamity tvould teed? [lferaw hear n It has been the giuly of latter tali, that between thu two deseripti ins of aer pubis force, upon all cot:cation., where the iatenstg 4 the empire called Vie! their ,cointined eitertiog, the most zealous co-operation has beeumgelfette During this loud disastrous waf t disastroui at I may say, . wheu applied to the .attainment of ow original objects, this cutintyy -has pijoye,.. the happiness ..f finding upon no .ON* nee4givoi the least rezogiiitiod of those complaials which did U. ist•at or her periods of its history, end which, if they had now efisted, would hails been.ftlt lit At lots of thousands of • our gallant Wenders; but, on the contrary, we have uniformly wiisesseltbs same zeal, energy, and heruit devotims, alliceft• ing both descriptiona o f ou r d e f ence , e ach sthlint to the glory of the other, by the recieruell a,. sietance afforded, when their conjoint engine" 'were demanded. [lloar! head] I Will 101 directly charge the Nokia Lord with that ig tentioli; but I beg leave to call this [loosening contradiction which exists' • between hi, elfil statements, together with . their rilrioce , W , 11 , h the truth, which hi s Majesti'vestswer has ram! ed. First, 'let it be recollected, ,that the Nehlf, Lord determined upon his unctinstitutioual egoist, at a time when nu inn - airy into the Expedition to the Scheldt was iotended; . wlnsit in place Of belt a measure being intended, his colleagues is lb. Cabinet had declared a contrary inteutiutt ; she" he must have {mown that • they would cult LI their power and influence to resist or to csaileil; [flew; hear !] when Ito . could not rootensplge that the dfoldir,...4tisit at_Ais *Utah 'l 4 l - Illti.", with the public voice of AC' obotary, wail wring it front a releethut .bet dlscullifi.o 41i ' elistry. Hear, h ea t 11 it was at such *lOl 'tient, and under such a state of things, that the Noble Lord seized the . apportimilf 4 darkly and secretly stabbing.,tiass coatitilitil of his country, o r if n ot th e .constilnlialbr._°_, • stabbing the tiara repatittion er sit W i w i •Strachan. [Hear, hear, hear.l ' Pilt- ki. l g g : you, that on the-14th of .Febreary, he first er, twisted this narrative to th e Kin g .. Why 641 ' 1'. titular 07;v ? Because it ,as a Lem day. U76';11.' Vestioned further f u r his reasons tar ilehyhtl 'l . ars", he_alites, that he understood it was the ' a ' teotinn of Sir Richard Striatum to pressed a ea t. retire of its proceedings. He is further Wald- gated, and his answer is, that he was anxious L : both narratives sh ou ld b e p resen ted on the rP__ ., day, as he was un w illi ng no t t o deliver his Who., that of Sir Richard Stracha.n. Let the House 11'.;, member, that the 14th o f February was fixed 81 10 1 by the Noble Lord ; at a time ts hen this ill , was iAgooraitt, as were his colleagues, of any p r e• Whet were your nia""/' thu for Noble Lord is asked, f or sefecting that illy . this simultaneous operation between yes an 3 : the naval Command er 3-s-lle had no"' . 1 . / ai v ilif you airy previous comm un ication w ith de lea - err 3—No. Wereyue called upon to prof's° ~... a alateMilit ?—Nu. Was Sir Richard StraChh il ' t hclieva.not. Betynts did delive r O ith fiver Os tin the I ) , s lar h,n, of Vehtuary ?—I l;J. Did Sir Rich 3" as circa s m pot ppw thl 1)00 1 it two hi [Wean to Vitt la lotif bi lol. of this istg n l°l iid4 fro*" • th y I ,r. r,,y tiul y' coi tiJbtile reaittni y.oti a.l ti you , uu cnl . 1 Toff Wt)U. v.)te ) chars( i;nFer Cary, . _ ;dICS 11:;IIC c.___.~ n firC.tS6 iiiluriu 31i Ler Ii vroct wont Costa Its reg . 44rt Hut 1 ~.~.r5~: Mil