The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-07-17 00:00:00

EAST INDIA HOUSE. A General Court of Proprietors was held dar, for the purpose of entering into furti ... coo s ides ations respecting the acceptance or .non.aCcept ance of the intended Charter: Some ordinary liminary. business was gone through, and of considerable length, signed by nearlk rectors, was read. This report embraced staittial review of all the proceedings that place relatively to the renewal of the Charter, menting upon thosaAruvisions which the Director. , congitlend Rcinjurious to the geneall fare of the Company's concerns ; and, impartiality, dwelling upon those.new which promised to secure and increase their in the posiession and preservation l of the I pire. The Report, having gotie through various topics, c.oseleded with a, dechtrat.i, they (the Directors who had signed it) under all the circumstances of the case, ad their constituents to declitie acceptizt the Charter , nay more, they ' would , posigsafy Oise.Atm. make a fair trial of it, especially as ft, the been mach and beneficially nrdified in its through the Legislature. In coming to that sion, they bad been catuidernbly intluenced, iloctiug what would be the sitoetiasr of thousands who were dependent, more or lets, upot the commercial and political existence of de Coal patty if they decline the Chaster ' as it Was now ten. de red to them (the Director*. For themselves they could only say, they wart willing to undertake the labour and responsibility' of executing-the providont of that Charter, if their constituents were willing to accept it. After the reading`ef this Report, which was re ceived with much applause by the Proprietors, a pro. test from J. Bosanquet, Esq. against the sentiments contained in it, was read, who dissented from the Report, because he did not think the Bill was found. ed in justice to the East India Company, or likely to be productive of benefit to the public in general.— .Auother paper was then read, signed J. Cotton (one of the Directors), which stated that hid the Bill been grounded upon she propositions as originally framed, he should certainly not have recdmmended the acceptance of the Charter. But, it had received so many modifications, and it was so impossible for the Company, if reinted to a mere commercial body, to carry on even its commerce with advantage without the possession of political power, that he should now strongly advise accepting the terms offend. Sir H. INGLIS said, that as it was understood the discussion of the subject was to be postponed to a future day, he should not now take up their time any further than to move, that the document which had been signed by so large a body of the Directors, should be printed immediately, and likewise the dis. sent of Mr. Bosanquet, that the Proprietors might have time to consider the repective arguments of those two productions, and coma to a deliberate decision on the question. When they met again, he would, with the permission of the Court, submit a *lotion to them. The motion for printing the papers was seconded and carried. Mr. Low Noss enquired whether any thing was Meant seriously to be done in behalf of the marine officers of the Company, that most deserving body of r: en. If not, he had . a plan in his pocket which world accomplish that objeei t without costing the Proprietor's, one farthing. The CHAIRMAN replied, that the Court of Directors had warmly interested themselves on the subject,. nor did they mean to remit their exertions tilt they had obtained some relief for those meritorious individuals, and about which they reere particularly anxious. Mr. R. JACKSON alluded to the minutes of a con. saltation held on the 101,h June, between certain of his Majesty's Ministers and a deputation from that Court; and contended, that the appropriation clause was framed in direct opposition to the principle ad mitted on the putt of Ministers at that interview. It was then agreed, that the whole territorial surplus revenue should be applicable to the discharge of the dividends, white, in the Bill, it appeared that it was now narrowetrdown to the surplus of a single year. He could wish that the f3lll, in its progress through the Lords, might be altered so as to embrace the plan admitted by Ministers in the conversation altuled to; and thought nothing more was necessary to induce them to make that alteration, than to exhibit the do. eument in question. • Mr. C. GstiNT wished to state, in explanation of what had fallen from the last speaker, that at the time of that conference, no specific security for the payment of the dividend had been proposed; since' that period, however, a specific security hod been de vised, and the commercial funds were not made liable to territorial demands till the dividend was satisfied. It had been stated to 'Ministers as an act of injustice, that when the commercial character was Separated from the political, to make the funds of the former liable to demands from the latter ; and that statement. had opened up a series of enactments, the object ofl which was to provide an absolute security for the payment of the individuals, as long as the coiamercial , funds shall be adequate thereto. ?dr. Lowman said, he had a plan in his pocket, which he meant to propose at the next s w eet' a nkt# creating a redemption fund, in order to pay, Orate India debt. He was also ashamed to see those two empty niches in the Court. Why were they not fillwi s% ith the statues of Lord Wellesley and his im-, mortal brother both of whom had done such essen tial service to India ? They were the greatt4t bene factors India ever had. If they had not been sent there, the Company would not no* possess a foot of land there. He meant to move; on a fiture day, that two noble statues of the noble brothers Should be placed in'the vacant niches.—Laughter.] Mr. Wean praised the zeal, diligence, and talent displayed by the Court of Directors in their negocia tion Kith Government, andaaid that Whetter terms for the renewal of the Charter had not been obtain ed, it was owing to no fault of theirs. They would have obtained better, if better could have been huh-11/ear, hear ihe Court then adjourned till neat Wen]. wishes) Vapei; but, by some strangnfatiliti which I cannot account for, he has not noticed my correction. I am fir from imputing this circumstauceto a sentiment of indifference to the great CUM a Truth and Pub lic Justice ; for I can never suppose such a sentiment in one who considers himself as the victim of injus tice, and who has, even since his imprisonment, , as serted the truth of that, which alone constituted his offence : neither can I entertain the supposition, that ea well-informed a person as the Editor of the Pa per in question, can be ignorant of the duty incum bent upon a Journalist to afford the means of cor recting any doctrines prejuaiciid . to the public inte rest, of which be may bate been unconsciously the disseminator. The personal security bf an Englishman, after , having been exposed to great and shameful violation in the reign of King Jotet, was, as I hope, for ever established by that clause in the Great Charter, where the King promises not to " pass upon any one, but by. the lawful judgment of. his Peers, or the . law of the land :"—but this security would vanish at once, if the king could nominate a jury of 12 . • • men to try a Commoner, or commission any number ! of Peers, short of the whole Hduse, to pass upon a 1 i Nobleman. Here we are told of something far worse 1 . -.-of a tribunal composed of four Commissioners 1. only, eominated by the King, 114 without eten the • power, as is pretended, of administering an oath. The mind recoils with horror at the contemplatioti Of sack an object ; for the reflection immediately oc curs, .That if such a monster as this 'really exists, there can be no safety for any one in this land, so long boasted for its freedom and independence. Now, although this monster of the imagination may not , be so horrible as he is represented, yet will I by ino means venture to pronounce him quite innocu ous; especially when I consider, that the most art ful means of establishing any very great oppression, is to accustom the people to the , idea of it before ihand. That this idea is abroad, we know; and if t the people are found to endure it, what is now but exaggeration, may become reality. The Citizens of .!. Westminster have taken `fi e 'glum ; and, in their Address to the PRINCESS; ipoke of this tribunal, as' lit has been called, in such terms as would have been applicable to the High Commission Courts under i CHARLES I. They speak of it, in short, as of a 1 j Court of Justice erected in violation of the Consti tution : now the truth is, that it was no Court of iJustice, but merely an inquest, or Commission, to en ; quire into the grounds of the charge, and report the 1 same to his Majesty, who, as Custos Pads, is bound to keep the kingdom in peace against wrong doers of all descriptions; but who cannot cause any man to undergo trial, from his own mere suspicion or opi inion. Indeerl it would 'be highly improper that he should; for, in that case, his inuipicions might be. I- come the source of grievous oppressions. Men.' I might be exposed to jeopardy, with respect to their I lives, as well as to ruin, in regard of expences ; and for all this, they would have no remedy,. as Sir i JOHN MAREHAN told EDWAILD IV. ;—for suppose ' this discretion in the KING, and be " were to do I wrong, the party (said he) could not have his action against himii." Certainly, it would .he very unfit that the - Chief Magistrate should be liable to be sued for damages .incurred in this way ; and yet great injuries may result from indiscreet prosecu tions; not to say a word about false, groundless 4 and malicious charges. But if ; PP the one hand, it - is not fit that the Chief ,Magistr4e. (who must be supposed to be inclined.to idministet itpartial jug.; lice, as by his coronationith.he is bound , to do) should be exposed to pr loos of . the nature here adverted to ; neither is it t 493iitho people, on the other hand, should recite wrong from the very means intended to dispens'e justice.. Our law sum Lex selves debit Remediam, there shall be no wrong without a remedy. Hove thee does it keep its promise in this particiter ? It sly, that the King shall not act, in this instance, front his own I opinion, but by the advice of some of his Count:H / 1 who shall be responsible. for the wrong that May be done to the subject .under colour, or pretence, of dispensing justice, Here is the remedy ; and a wiser one, I think, could not have been devised by human ingenuity, It is also of high antid • Thh, has hem be Pere (rioted Craw/Chief Jamier libssiir f see al:n a Treatise published iu voi, entill. d 46 . 4 11441. Pi ilsjii ,AffiliC3lll. " p. 94. contained in this constitutional Institution: They had no good will towasds this , Innocent Lady ; and they held her up to suspicion, thoogit they .ofd not dare to idyls, her prosecution& In this they went beyond their Commission, which was to enquire, and 'report, not to pass judgment, censure, Or condemns. tion of any kind,, particularly- such as thelitty had no means of vindicating herself against...&.-- It is under the King's Commission that all justice' Whatever is administered ; and every Commission is constitutional that is given for lawful purposes, as this certainly was.. But if Commissioners exceed the duties of their office, - we ought not to blame the law, but (hose who act wider it. The question asked in the Examine(' newspaper, supposes that: there are two ways in which the Ministry may primed in cases of this kind. By one of these modes of proceeding the party whn preferred the accusation may be pu. nished for perjury, in case his accusation turned out to be Aloe and malicious; and by the other he can. not • and the Commissioners are asked, why they preferred the latter method, insinuating that it was purposely done in order to cover the DOUGLASES with impunity. From whatever source the Dove. LASES may derive their scandalous impunity, this, at least, is certain, that it is not to be fathered upon the Constitution. It is, indeed, a libel upon the Constitution to suppose that it sanctions such an election as is here alluded to. It would be a radical defect, and an indelible disgrace likewise attached to the Constitution, if it allowed any mode of die. pensing justice, whereby perjury might be practised with That It has been so practised cautiot be doubted ; but it has not been, by a radical -defect of the law, hut Py the neglect of those whose duty it was to carry that law into execution ; andd 4 foi this we ought to be thankful, because the one Is an evil much easier corrected than the other. As to the assertion that this was a tribunal incoma patent to administer an oath, it is only to be com• pared in absurdity to the other assertion included in the same 'query, that these Lords were not Privy Councillors. The warrant that gave them authority to enquire, directs that the inquest shall be taken upon oath ; it also calls these Inquisitors by the name of Councillors ; and if they had not been Pro `ceri Regni before, this very act would have made lhem such. In . short, this Commission of Inquest was as much a constitutional Commission as a Co. . toner'; Inquest, or that of a Grand IGO.' It was as necessary a discharge of .the Knfl?s obligation to keep the peace; and as much in conformity-with the due course of law as either of -thens--and therefore perjury,' , 6lhibited before such It inquest,. is as much ender the-Cognisant% of the laW as before a Coro ner's Jury, or a Grind Jury, all these inquests be. lug institutions under the same intention, namely, to prevent innocent people from being.aggrieved, by being unnecessarily put upon thein trial, as. well as to prevent the real culprit from evading justice. As I never transcribe what I write, I cannot be at pre 'sent exact as to the contents of my Letter to the Examiner; but the arguments used were to the above purpose ; and I hope your insertion of this Letter will tend to clear up this great constitutional point, with such of his Readers, at least, •as also be in the habit of perusing your Paper, tho l ; it would be more proper if . the same vehicle that dts tributed the poi.on should be made the conveyaune of -the antidote. • f &c. TIMOTHY TRU EMATC Suakingthannhire, July 6, 1813. • Debet 1/011114 leee4 et ennmoetudioee appenbritax erigere.... ticket judietoni retelling in Itegno facere. et Jtatilitaa per coot.i• Haut pri ceruai regal owl tenere. Leger Cdovardi, apud Wilkins, p. 200. We lately mentioned a horrid murder, by poison, committed on the body of Robert :mgNein, a gardener; of Waltham, on Thursday the Ist instant, by AluhafFountain, his wife, .and G. T .. Rowell, a cooper, who lodged at the house of Pountlin.—A Correspondent, iu detailing thii•iiirrid thin, says ) "several glans had bett'lltOtglifit'of tb gei rid of this poor unfortunate hosbantidbylas wife and the lodger. By their ori..n.Coliftsttnyai the,' first thought of friddenitig him to death- I -tett of throwing- him into the well, and 'diowning another method. was tO. shoot hitn—but the one phich proved beat suita bl e to their dtabolittl d 1 po- Sition was to give him t !mitlomA queptiti. of lan., denuin.—This appears' by the doctor's evidence, and verdict of the Corooer's Jory r litre been the refuse oV.tho catastrophe: Symptoini •of • tiolencb taw appeared over the body •f .the dectised.--• impatient at tint seeing the tirst-doie prodbct tit' deßi red., the . ;odger .yeas disOatched ler% mote" —fa which it seems it iisa•thought aeceitiet to. add:, Nowa, :witiCh , weit dauhtieu inliiet6d *Ws! the us- Hetint lq ist a ittipified state,. • ,~ i• . • Ti . OP; Rat -.110,1,1F4t. WATERS p. TAYLOR. . • • • •I• CONTEMPT.. . • • - • This *u a taetioa spade,. by ..Pdrk Bea., oWbehalt of 1M r : thatato.Tregautet pied Receitter of the nightii retdrns pf . the Theatre,- for. a order to commit .TOhn, Townsend, the Police ,tlp the Fleet Prisen, n fo r having with force thu g . . Asked from Mr. Ha rrison, OnAfie night of the ;let .at tho Open Hduse, a suet ot twenty pounds 4i-shillings, part of the Theatre monies, in violation of the i Lord Chancellor's order Af•lnjunction, and fdr constituting Mr. Harrison as the Receiier. • . • .."7 h s John Townsend ettended ih Cour t , luring sodo. of the intended application • „ grid intending to plead his own cause, although defended by 'Mr. Hert 'and Mr. R!chards ; but an arrangement was propoted by the Counsel of Mr, Townsend, sanctioned, Or reeom mended by his Lordship, and acceded to blr the Coun sel of Mr. Harrison, consenting to let the • present motion stand over and form a feature of the cause, which, in It few dip, will hare a final hearing, being now set down in the paper. •• • • . Judgment was deferred till the hearing of thsrge. !feral cause: --•-• • WIt.DE V . NONON. •• • " • ••• This was a motion of a novel kind, tailing for an order upon the Plaintiff, who sues in fqtaso ris, to gi•.a security for costs, and to-stay pr aol in this cause till he pay the costs .f a former action"( ejectment, in which he failed tot Want of the_M fendant's answer to this bill of discovery and relief ; the motion fuither went h) iMpOte 'on the Pfaintift the hard condition of paying the cots of his unsuc.. cessful suit in the Prerogative Court against the will of the testator In this causes to whom the Plaintiff is heir at law, or next of kin, while the proper V la devised to the -Defendant by the Will, chfirged td have been obtained under fraudulent circuthatances pending the weakness or incompetency of ttie.tas tidos.. — The motion was strenuouly opposed Oil *admit grounds, namely, that_the Plaintiff was. a pauper; that no costs were required of him in the Ecclesiasti cal Court ; and that this suit was notstated to be vexatious; the Plaintiff's Counsel contending, that this motion ought to be refused with costs, as utterly unprecedented. - • . . The Lair, CistitctrAcin warmly anitnadierted on the nature of this motion, and the ieal that ap peared respecting it on both sides at the Bar, respect. , ing whlch•zeal, he promised it should hare no in. Suence on his judgment, as he was determined to re fuse the motion, 'but without costs on either side.— His Lerdship obsecved,..that the motion was of very great importance in a general view, since on such doctrines next of kin may for ever lose his right,;.‘ and in the Defendant's situation, 0110 may pew. and withhold the right of another man. No case was cited, nor could be; to justify the present mo. tion, as was slid down by Lord Chief Justice de Gray and Mr. Justice Gould, said his LOrdship, and dismissed the motion.. *Orskfi norfour ,llse VACR-CHANCILLOIL • • • KINNERII4.It cr.ARILS. This interesting gise came before the Court upon to exception to the Master's Report, which iras very .ably argued at the Bar on both sides. The question arose on the last will of the ale. brated Mr—Gibbon, the historian, vtho died oboe's( twenty years ago; at lAusanneoiri . Switzerland, cam: • stituting Lady Elliot .his heiress, es the nearest rill, tion of his then living, ex pule poterita, antldelled • to here except certain !rocks to other persona, not. only his own freeholds,-bet likewise thole he.held in trust under a friend's will for the penest of others, if found to be keit* with reverAolt to him eta his right heirs. 'l'he purchaser of one of the trait mitates tiled bill against tit* vemierth praying all necessary .. ..., PetVel!-' to be decreed' to join in making out and atecaeksig . • psi titleto hfmfrom the venders. Lally Ormond is trustee or executrix 0eiP4,0116;..• *on, and on a referent* before the Master; !ANC rte execute the conieyance,, On the grdomi --1-1. _there was a gentlewoman. Chiming to bit tiVelielresi of • law.or neat of kin of Mr:Gibbon, but witheisk living, in that long interval, taken any tiep'toprove ler'clitith:th Wing any evidehcateriore (he Miter oti the reference. The great circumstat of ;the duly to which he her Ladyehipi • This was &ad / and - " .. .i . , .' :t . .* • ~.- . ) . . .... .. . • - • -i t t-. . ••• . . •. - .I * . ' 0 ~ -•••• :". • t •:• \ )-kg•-:•..rt,- -. • • 1 , . , . % r• • ••• . . ... . • • . . THE STA ' -:' " -t-- . - .. .. . . ....... . „.......,,... ......;....„.......„*.s.,_ • •,... -A. cz..0:44 ... ~=..-.. • . - ,- -,7"t'4°---"=l* • t'''' -- - *---.:47--,-. 44 ..;•:' - .__ . ___ _ .____ ....... 7 .- —_ - ... _ IM _..._____..... ________ .__ ' EXAMIAR • NEWSPAPEL ..a1.. "7 1 _••• '‘ , :4.44aik '34 , ' ---- • . q " .1 7 41 ` .. : ' 'itelkii '' I. - may -I es It . ' : lie 1%7- •- ~ tIOV ilnYiktielikOK l ' .:%.0 .., . . *or ork sattlaidewltssuir-Coestitutim4llllll . • . 4:- ; • , : -. i... 4 6e. -..- s' ' •:' - • :•• • - -oillwo, , '.. '', -, ' ' whOefebric. Tho•Seeett lew earl, •.• • . held yester . TO THE EDITOR or TAR eThTmesskie . ...• ~ whil,:altessot be .withdrisen without ruin- tfa , )4lo . .7 ' • 1:001tf Or efutiogßir, iiiii.lirf •• further cep , g ut -In the tseurthW Newspaper, of Sunday, net govern will, eta& rawereo that If a Itlisg • -' • •• ' .44..1 .4' ' • • -.-.--.. .• . ali* l iii4e•l' :. l illat - VlVAtiCia 7flgoTlltp. . . ~ . 1 caa'•-aterPt* Nay. the 30th, an article was Inserted trade the sig- 1 4(4 . name at Kingi • - . , . • -, --. .- - • 1111011l1LIS .t O . ,tOLIVA'S. . 4 .•.:-.; .... 1 ff.. ..., • . ,dinar pre: nature of. Atrosci l contataing samsl . licestiw" ie - NO* Atds. would hare been rathor-a hareh-coedition, - • lig be shill lose t h e . 1 -r ' fl:lteurct. i mated for dinicestas ibt „ 04 , d a rePoqv • specting the Investigation made btto,•theirounds of if this:same, law had not olearlis.dleilttok-svhat was trar,ta issue the order hi him obtained iii ' r .„,' -a" • tha: 6l -: the criminal charge against ' the priocoos o f WALEs markt by, Orme. retire, •It watt* p r eserve the good dalri.etilpowering Mr. Morris te. ariploy gawk av Ki o circuits- ~.. by ..Lords SPENCER, G al"' LIJ I I- Sbutw ho sonon, law,krod approved prawns ; to cau se r i g ht „lodgments' and,contract for all.things 'for opening „title;Thaddre a had taken ' , and ERSZ;VE at the command, .and !loader the ' au- to be an mid justice ad m i n i s t ere d b y the advice of without the assent of Mr..Colman v tlio aterdijpilind , his.Conncillors*. .Here the. ?eider *ill nite•how paitniner of the conr.etn who ,telOisii . ....brAO Any. tarter, cote-. thorny , ofthe it ...ING:. one of thencinen lians wa s ) ! justice I s to:be administered Kin ' et n g . hi ' . ' . 14141111 / 1 /14. idilhe ; •not after , the • lig .s . . o . ~ Merit s or coestult.to the to Court ot. tt Why those Noble Lordpiipreferresk the character i awn disettoisp, but bi the advi t enot hie.Coomelltors,. .perforirisnres, by which meatts.tl;ii-Onliild ente tillia-f • genera lwit-,, it e Commissioners, which. prevented •thoit , being a I who, if tiox jive him pernicious adrice t are telPeabi- .. inents . atthis.'fheatre were luspended . : . the Leeeee4 v 10 4 0 4144 r hribirnal competent to sdminister oaths to witnesses, 1 ble for the. wrong they may thelyby,eccasion. Naw, 'Cooosel observed forthet r that hi ,tvai, shop/lied: to tetailla‘., li, vto :that of Privy. Councillors, who 'are legal- Magis- I let us apply ,this 'reasoning to the Mai ic • question ; find tile Order .resisted to tbe oinde,.sithnagh sin owe ieir infereste te • h tv , The words Commissioners, .. . tr i t e mt or respec . - a charge trfillighly - criminal nature.** Made against opposed his metiqo /Or ft on ! the first day.iif the Salt y the Princes* cif.Wasss; the KING, brills oath, was when the order was .01140,. according to hit tool. Indlan e • • 1 1- • Privy Councillors, and legal Magistrates, were bound to keep the peace against Sher' as..Vred as. the 'lectiork- •. . . .....: •' " • .. • t: • : 4.t,....••• ' ;II all 'those,, , printed in italics. The question supposed that the -. meanest of his subjects; he could •nOt eseilook the , ----htes HART opposed the order, en the part -of Mr $ . _II . . ration, ; twat four Lords were not Privy Counciliers 4 wor legal offence, neither could he bring her to trial upon his Colinan, and Mr..Lescri On bland( of Mr..l4.rinitos:. l could no t , 1 magistrates, but only Commissioners, sitting in . a own discretion, for he is to administeiltillice pet clot- apother Defendant s rate Part owner,of • die Theatre, ase, adviOe 1 tribunal not competent to administer oaths to wit- 1 :ilium Procerum Regni mi. He gives a Cotninitsion on the grounds that the titillate' Of the • ordet: werd the Chart e r, . . .. . . th an - ... to the•fourLords above-Mentioned, - to enquire Into hot given, end not framed according. to bseel'aere.•. estes:, Thisi Sir, no notion an. w h ich nothing ' thegrounds of theto enquire forms : *Ming, that they thoold oil. it . charge , upon oath; and ninnies or : , , . . . , . rir -,-.. is° : Atm •to can be moire erroneous, more absurd, And; I conceive : to report _to him, whether there wea.any foundation e 4, the giving of -hit,liordship's .ixidguseot lowojemrs ; he Hill, bad, t i f may with.propriety add; snore dangeroust• I cou- or oot bar the accusation. Now, suppose them lotif -x terdfotfittlirkearlibg the isiSdaVits that *are bindad ur its progress "wired it as right and proper to state the great dan- I Lords had said, that there were good grounds for the to ilibti! ',I. : . . .' r . • • ;-.• - iiiiiii i . . . .. , that concha- ~.... and: the' u i absurdity of di ' error l e the , charge, when there were none would that notliove ....Theloitti Cwsxcer.r.,ott tottlioli aka ire, iced, by re- ' l '`',/ • . - . e q. * ...- , - -- 1.-- . • ' •• • • -- - ; Inven .sespdpelisivr to the puffy • idelliiobsteafielifiely, t hiltilheloirlllial Oppoitentttlif :triolfdittiths thilne 11 the Aug, .Prn ter °f t . he-Exe , nuer ' 1 77 1 5 1:4 " f (11 . h°1. ' I P - i. " -- Sel'f"' • ' r teas, ilpon Preheild) 'I, r _.. _ . . k _.•• . ,_.• •t.i, must be con s cious t hat pa, naa . m good , : not to coin* themselves in any tech way ; and their meat to the tont:re... •,. " ,f life - Corn. wishes) the very instant drat,l reed t h e , . s ~.stialqa his prudence exhibits . also the wisdom and recintio Juti merit was deferral till Mond* neat. ' • vas nnw tint. 1 . 1"........: • ism. hl, diner". a f i• - •: n mit fli ill lit V chick !cannot ' A.,...i..i.....1 1.. .IA. ......4:4-6:-...-1 .a....4:6-61 P . M1L...! 4 * g * l ' , ' Y rence. • • • • • ;teat singularity of tVe liattsisted in awl: ,ante, and 4hich hiallorsont much rogretied t uly elidence of ptrdliree for kindred of bay oor with MrAlibboili* (lista 'hhif . . . le aisigns as lila 41rottif4111a1 towards hi the liktioataled.file.Ylo Of - *h., .7 ancestrat and gc*md • ' .• ( was held.to be seileierh 446,44 Usk N , sd the Master's Report Can law& • a