The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-12-09 00:00:00

.~~ a. OpfeiI.SATURDAT, Dec. 7. _-...-00.-- • • ..., TAYLOR C. &SHAUN • 'This wee a nection for goods sold and delivered.— The plaintiff is a tailor, the defendant a fencing touter. . The present action was brought to recover the price of a salt of Clothes, made by plaintiff to the order of de- Pentane Wi:nesses were called to prove that they were 'mule according to order, in a workman-like manrer, and of good materials, and also that they fitted the defendant. On their being sent home, however, the - defiselent referred to pay the price agreed on, GI., or pidebd to take the clothes at all, on the ground that - they did not lit, and the present action was therefore Wrought th recover Cie amount of the plaintiff's demand. Oh the part of the defendant several witnesses were called, who proved that the clothes were ill-made, and • •did not fit: it was also proved that in the sleeve of the coat there were some defects in the cloth, which had ern.eime drawn. . , ThiGlary found a verdict for the defendant. . ... --...m. • COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, Dec. 7. • • RAVIMSCROIT 0. ARCOSOLD, Est. Mr. Sergeant Ons Low stated, that the plaintiff in this OKe wean wig-makerand d of considerable eminence r 'siding in Sarle-street, Liocola's Inn, and the defen dant a gentleman at the bar, whose learning and talents -ever. well known and appreciated by the profmsion.— , t 6, action was brought to recover the sem of 13/.10e., in respect of dressing the defendant's. wig from the year . of 1/118 to 1821. It was customary among gen *Wizen ra(' the defendant's profession to leave their wigs tat Westminster, from whence they were fetched by the plaintiffsAervants, three times a week, dressed and re mei. The charge would be acknowledged by every body to lee extremely moderate, when the time, labour, and distaste were considered. The sum charged for each &reefing was only 30. Evidence was then pro-1 doerd to prove the work done, and the amount of the bill. Mt. Sergeant TAZDT addressed the Jury for the de readier. He should prove that the wig had not been 'deemed by.the plaintiff during the whole time specified in the account, the defendant having been abroad part rig that time. Besides this, he should further reduce the account by shelling that part of the money claimed, if due to SOY person, wee due to the plaintiff's assignees, helossiste been a bankrupt at the commencement of the tyrant. 'The Learned Sergeant then went on to deny the penctiee mentioned by his brother Onslow I the fre !Wean of the dressings given to a gentleman's wig de ism/di*, in his opinion, as much on the taste of the owner as.on his business. All the gentlemen of the liar were not like. his Learned brother. Mr. Sergeant Onelow, distinguished for the excellent rendition of their Wigs; nor perhaps had Mr. Itavenacroft taken so much pains to dress their wigs as he bail always taken with respect to his L d brother's, espeebtlfy on this occa sion. As his Learned brother had 'hi-happiness in life In be distinguished for his excellent •condition, even to Ids wig, so no doubt would lie possess that advantage even) death, and shine (though he trusted at a very slide period) the rival of his ancestors, who were all, es ally Mr. Speaker Oeslow, to be seen in Guildford pe is Cherch-yardiwath perukes of the first class— " Well Wielded ea la Pariah stone." A irig.dresser was called to prove that hi had dressed the trig part Mr proved tin , PI • #O4 min Meade akar owe, betas bring didik ed.* her helitiend —These persons, she told her fervaft„ were it dined circumstances; and it we, to theta sbe t• for the benefit of the onsnspectiog Mr. Ad his neck-kerchiefe, stockings, and shirts. I was hardly necessary to say that no such pres•al ad Mr. and Mrs. Donollv existed —the real party beime". Mr. Potter. Herr, then, were strong additional 'meads: for presuming the adultery which was charged. chic assistant.keeper of the prison deposed. that while Petra' remained there, he was visited almost daily by Mrs.. Adams, wham be end to call his wife. Now she phis' set up on the other side did admit that Mrs. Adman used to go and visit Potter in prison, but deuie4 all crimi nality on that account. The Conn. horreerf• • FPO' scarcely know how to reject so natural an interim/4 BM it was proved, moreover, that We: Adams ant this man were frequently seen together in the prison, W . 114•11 she had her arms ronnd his neck, and be bad his rotio.l her waist; and yet the learned gentlemen on the other side would wish to persuade the Court that thete was no I adultery in the case !—that these indecent familiarities were the result of a mere Platonic attachment, forsooth, between the parties!—that no improper intereoarse subsisted between them, although she carried him a con siderable part of her husband's wardrobe. and a reason able proportion of her husband's larder too! There was in the prison a particular recess, in which the M. teal commission of the adultery Most probably omen/di but, for the reasons he had Orem!) , "submitted to the Court, the learned counsel contended it was unarcessery for him to prove the charge in any one particular place, the presumptions being so very strong In support of MI6 titled illicitintercoune. Simllaropportunities for the isensammationoftheirerime had been afforded ta ' sad most probably accepted by, the parties in the porter's l odge and wergery of the prison. Two letters, which were proved by Mrs. Katherine Johnson, the sister of Mrs. Aflame, ti bare been intercepted, were admitted by Mrs. Adams Wendt to have been intended for her. They were ii die hand-writing of Potter; and N 0.2 began thin:— oeDestroy this immediately, before yea get tome." 4 here was a correspondence secretly, byletter, !Jewett Ides. Adams and Mr. Potter. It was addressed to " MriE Stanhope, Post-other, Borough." (This letter was all 'odd mixture of reproach and expostulation: after rd. Irellating the dist incident on the lady's wall pnactuality in not keeping an appointment she hid made with the writer, and descanting on the miterles of a bad pair of shoes, a wet night, and a broken aseignlA tion, it entreated the favour ofa speedy interview, and it some relief in the mean time.) In the ether letter Met Potter expressed himself jealotis lest the lady's &Met had met been confined to himself. (This epistle rel. poached her with having been dragged into gin-shops by female friends, who made her pay for theanhat which should have been tl for the writer ; and assured tier, that "if she mistimed true to him, be would most certainly stand by her.") True ? —to wham/ why, not, as the Court must perfectly welt see, to atr. Adams, her husband ; but to Mr. Geor go Potter, her parantoar. It would be difficult. indeed, for the lady's whined to contend that these letters we e mete promises of (stare adultery, rather than recognitions of peat incontinence. The moral conviction of the Court matt be, that the criminal connexion had really subsisted Welles the parties ; and it would therefore hold the hefted es. titled to his for separation. tin Me ja i= -el been theemiliandospie now charged lagainst her was hive abolialied. It was said to have costinued until 11111i•tad to him remained undiscovered by the husband MO alma period of that year. Why, could it be biliewied That for a period of three years, and from day etrplay. These criminal intercoarses should ban been cauyillgrob *places the most unlikely and uncouth, nod, all ivikjipod that the ether side woold Infer, almost is the of 40 or 10 persons? As to the visits paid by Adams to Mr. Potter, they might be indisereee proper ; bat it was going • great wig indeed to basil*, thing of a guilty complezioe Item them. In throw of " William and In which " Eilietismed Elliott" was , particularly referred to, Sir Win.. said, " though the Court may thhk these visits a married waives to a single mai very improper. • must be conviaced, in its legal judgment, that titte‘tre• man bus p.issed the boundaries, sot sully of deliesoyi•buit of duty." The Learned Counsel then adverted ft umiiiee cue, noted in ** Williams and Williams." namely, Ricketts and Taylor," also decided by Sir W. Suitt, !ethos ledge of the Conaistory Court; and they ego. 'elided by submitting, that no ground was laid to found :the husband's prayer. and that Mrs. Adams, thellefbroi i'litofht to he dismissed from all further observimee, She 41011. Judgment postponed. • ' • SIUIRIFF'S COURT, Ran Lioet-savant, BOW Oh' Before a Special Joey. AIJORTIC, 62NT, W. .......... 116• ThIS was an 'aloe to recover esomemuttlou In delete, for an assault. 141%,C6122,L211 PELLITI ItOillft Obi plaintiff's cue, spa c o ned Mr. James Scott, who said litiltftitishoff caw to die Mitre of Mr. Robins, to • Algitli Waal articled club s riey the 14th orlon. list. The *bit ease for the petpolltif ascertains the address of the defendant: The ihmeetthone of the plaintiff was.genthereantlko. At the moment lg.*. quiry defendant passed through the °Wee, and peroelithrtbo plaintiff said. " You want my address 1 believe. ^ :‘ lOW riaistiff replied, "feint Mr. Moultrie's address." Tue.- fendant rejoined, "My same is Montague, prey ler what purpose do you want it?" The plaintiff answered,. "teriedrot tell you for what purpose."Nie dameanour was byraistuuts insulting. The defendant then salted witness for some paper to write down his address, which he gave him.— 7Ja• defendant then pualted.the plow to the plaintiff.. r o t Mid "Take it to Messrs. Rice and Son. and tell them t tree pair of spouudrtls." . 'De plaintiff refined to be the heafer ofso insulting a message, and added. that the were 'to more seontulrels than the defendant. The t then rushed at the plaintiff, and repeated) , atm* e stick, and from the violence with which he apli • stick broke, and exhibited a blade of about eight Ischia long. Mr. Robins and witness then interfered, and otweille ed further violence. Mr. Corbett, a surgeon, described the injury sustaili•Vy the plalutiff. Mr. James Rice proved that the plaintiff was in hls•r- Voyment. lie had tinhhed his terms es an articled Clerk in the rountry. and came to his office for Improvement. Re sent him to Mr. Robins's office for the purpose of dlicireer. lag Mr. Movitague's address. This was a Deemer, wept. his moving for that geutleman to give need* forcostoin mantles. in which h.: was plsintle. Mr. Anoseaus addreesed the Jerrie , -;tigatlon ado :cages, and the Under-Shrriff having r-r ovt r the eivh &arc, the Jury found • verdict for the pi • .S. —Dunne*, Comeau:vs is preparing for Representation at Ara Lone Theatre, in order to find another opportunity ./ ititneming the combined talents of Mr. Keats and Mr. Young. St4ppi r ieilaruaimi. emAnat-6rtgaJus,y. befibiereirapet to tin hie, la in ledietMent cliarginOtws with wilful and corroptp erjory, with int bi ett toi relining, Ward, I Sheriff% Officer, on the 244f1ekt oflily, • Sfettloisicson opened the case for be proseottion. The peittecolcir had been employed by a Mr. Dailey. in hit capacity of an officer, to arrest the efendant. Mr. Weird Met Ida in the street . , and, in consequence of lisitlitlvat then said, Ward let hire go for the time The lammed Choke* ins' about to read a letter; written Mitmellienify by Mae defend ant, to the prosecutor, when • Jir. AboOntre interposed, and said, the Conrt was eidted wilt. inquire. with respect to an alleged act of lierjary, tarnishheti in the Court of Common Pleas, to nits tide a Warrant of Attorney, and that letter had no tOtijr•to do with the present inquiry. Conn over-ruled the objection, and Mr. CcalltOOD wont on to read. The letter stated, that the prisoner would eaH and settle with the prosecutor, but he did not keep tis promise, and went to France. He, boweier; refereed to this country (Mr. Ward having, in the interlio;pald the debt to et r.Dalley) Mr. Ward then called on him several times, and pressed for payment. The defendant, as alleged, esbeequently gave a War- rant of Attorney,for the payment of the money to Ward. On this Warrant of Attorney the perjury arose, the de leaden' being charged with having sworn, that the Warrant of Attorney was extorted from bim, under tea ts of immediate removal to* distant gaol, namely, teat of Horsham, he, at the same time, -labouring antler severe indisposition. Wm. Hvnde. Adams, Clerk to the Under Sheriffs of Sussex, produced the writ of copias. Mr. Rose produced an affidavit of debt made by *eta against tkoodnian, the defendant. ••• . 4... Mr. A not,eive objected to the thitnieniot hero in this este, and contended it could'SVibtroter. person who made it was identified. '• 7747 The slgnettre Was thew proved to be that if illhipfst. *Tutor, and h was read.' Iliwas marelyteralidatritliMl the defendant was indebted to Ward, &r.• ' If,. Rd wird; the slieriffs'offiettiginidtreed the waning Dada Wilehlbe defendant was *Vented by him. The Wit; otticiptored him on the 2lst of NOtemiser about three eclat: • 'k'porsort named Jickman was present. Thir Defendant said be did nut owe Word the money, and it he, Wera;•ttealed him in'that kind of way, he shoed make np his mind and go to gaol. The defendant apt peered to have a cold. - The defendant was not so far 10 disposed as to render it dangerons to remote him. Wit; nen asked defendant if he could gin bailor any other security that would satisfy the party,end defendant sale "No." Ultimately, Mr. Goodman propewed to give security, namely, toot if the prosecutor would take it in three years he would agree to it. Mr. Sherwood, At torney, of Chichester, preparedtbe security which wan executed at Johnson, Price, and Preelend'i, Chictieol ter. Ward, the plaintiff, was not present at the time'..j Mr. Johnson et ploineil the doctunint to the defendant.' Croscrxamined—Ward was an officer to the Sheriffs of Sussex. Witness livid at Petwortb, 14 miles from where the defendant rived. Ward lived in Chichester •as well as the defendant. Could not say whether he resent to the defendant on horseback or In a horse and gig. Theft was a pri on at Petworth. Ward kept a loektego boost! at I.4liiel?ster. Tip defendant said he • wapitprat **cloth whe t 'defend av Its cot Mr. 'idiantage ird's letttst Shi p. a isle 'Mehl tole • .• , • • - . • Jaicknurn, the cater, proved' the rietatiber meths war: rest of Attoprey,•which was . - Pat it lied NIL Take" au no threes dud to isdat• delpsdewssee • • it. Edwards said he mid tales •haireetiegt that sight satisfythe plaintiff. ..s •• • AL. tr ' Cressozaoitoed.—Witsess wad-Wsees • laihivrer.... When Edwards first want to fire defirdistr ire watered the house alone. - Witness hawked, sale. door..was opened to Lim directly, It might he three minutes after Edwards entered... Witness rappelled he - and Edwards Knight have beep is die house fear, or five boors Wiest the deteadstitereed to give the teursat eflAtter,"! Witness aid e dw ards took tea with die fmadly Uid - sot bean Edward, pourede the defendant, to give the , Warrant of Attorney. Tbeilefestanla nut go., Itherwood's at pile . Mr. Amiantus her rose and objected to the card protteedieg, futhrs. The Warrant of , Attorney pus. purred tte,isswe teem the King'. Bench, -while in feet it bore the same .tat one_ of. the Judges .01 the Common Pleas. The objectiestwas hehbfatisk sad the prisoner acquitted. • III: •• • LIBEL ON THE THIRD RE41)111111T,OF FOOD' (WARDS, Ism sines v. wean, The defendant is this cue was put to the bar on an indictment charging him with grow, sad scutalassili. l bele on the Commander of the. Forces, the Cahoot' and °Ecru of the 3d Regiment of Foot (laude, the Sur geon of the Regiment, Sec. Sec. . The libels in qaution originated out of the death of John Egg, or Haigh, in the year 13111. . . r Asioureseopuied the case for tbepposocittiots, in :She course of Which Le defended the Olken 0 the Rs giutent from the calumny throsenda dim by the defend ant. who appearedro be the friend of the deceased. It sworld be remembered he said, that a saltier of the moot ~et•Egg or Haigh,or souse such name, for it. was laid is various wave, had been taken ill sod died. Siam that tinte-tbe defendant had never ceased to writ* Utters and ,pest Plourde. ushers few hot soldiers resorted, of the Mat infatimatory nature, notwidutending every info& rotation bad been ;afforded him, and the report made ta his Koval Highness. the Doke of York; eves read .to him. In the course.uf his addressAlte 4earned Commit , read the paragraphs which appearetis the Examinee in the mouths of bitty and April - WIG and 4419. which had in tut been avowed by the defendant. He then pro duced and read the written' proclamations of defendant. wide, hi described its gross libel. sod declared that ever, information had been given to him that could be I wished by any renunable titan. Is was not, lie said. the wish of the pertons wbe brought Wit prostration, so punish , with severity the person apiarists whom he up paved. They weal only induced to come before the Court to clear the character of the. regiment from the foul and uoionoded calotonies that had been .levelled ' against the officers, from the death of tlie• defused up to She present time. It hat bees kupod /bat the taliag I site defendant to Bow-street would have hod tare elteck , o f d e forgisx , Lisa hots condoning in his Atersec. bat that. b a d tallest, and the only curie*: havlltat bring him before this Uinta. The, Ideirohil thus, eel consledell .hy again tteclaring,,thot :the oily,: ph, led sou to. clear the regiment in. the rut of :the outstay,, eta charge, that, if tuffsred to remain. aau ow *red, *MI stark Witb ate deopest-ohloquy a set,of sandeneee. thug 11012 there did 'nos alit snore skilfot,htienalte aid tits. ritable parent In the known world: • , . A wig-dresser was called to prove th at he had dressed lido/ 'to hie prayer for separation. On hie part tblTp fo7k.np house at Vbichester. The defendant said he 1 the wig p art of the time, and Mr. Shafer. _an atterooy , bad been nothing like collusion or cassias Initiii 2558 would gb to Horsham. it weediest three o'clock when peeved the commission i bankruptcy lathed spinet the wrong ; for it was on the 27th of Jely, 1821, that Mee. fe, the within*, went" to the betel of thedefeedant..--- g plaintiff in 1817. Adams win detected pawning the clothes of her bste• might Mara stopped there twe bears; it Was then rather i Crom.examined.--When the commission was tossed bawd. *lli thereupon sent her back to her stones: Nil- dark. Horsham was distant thirty miles fromehietes.• 1 the plaintiff bad himself paid to the assignees the sums in ir then ignorant of her sdaltery. This was 505 dt ter; Whine received the warrelit friths Birk Sherwood. t due to him froth several gentlemen at the bar. he prevent. covered by him until August, then be tifaldir W e b' du: a m empl o y him, bet had 'bowed him where their biting sued, lest he should lose their business. take her back, and instituted proceedings against bet. ' tbe ~•• Wad, Witarse had said he wutil,i lose i Me. Sergeant Owssew replied. Dr.-Deseerr. followed an the same Ada". 7 . 1' ..A .L '''' '',' • .-..^ 1 7 3 Al a, Ward 16004 lose his money. Jack. I , Lord, Chief Jackie DALLAS could not refrain from is- Dr. BORNAIII and Jssss Antlass.oll the pampr • .'" mi n - • •r•-• - ' • . twistertles dug • I de. i pressing his regret that a gentleman se dettervedly tele- Adams, relied on the total absence. as tit t. : ,.. h •• • . fr .1 trsteWas the defendant. iiieeld suffer .10*,,,,,5thissmi- ell tilsee.presitinte ' stfitraiwrvni .. : .-- .- e :. - -.• ..., u mte d .fihe'd :.. • . it! ' 'bed ' folie. ill which Wt*preimitt bet etrowgitf Isralart Mar' - 4 stance in this case. These parties, Mr. std Mts.JeleibliN then *Mr Si fire. ICti took plate In'thJ Tfielarg gave a verdict for the plidstifirsle. the full pets Married bilBoll. said lived tog ether , es it Vie ad- beetroot.. Did not see sh* Maid: ' ; ittoinial of the bill. nutted en the other side,•utiril ISIS .in . n the Most palled* ft e . t e e mmeed.—Therenseir i 'Michela ialtinf Weald --....m.-- harmosy, the latter period being tbst at uthichtbesifal. t em doe ppm 'jib / Deifies Ward illdald be wattilt.lfai COURT OF THE DEAN AND CHAPTER OF ST. terenilatereonrse now charged against her was mid ft ha cossapteare of lir. Hoeifielas saying he vretthi ltki ..,. ... . the due ► their. CUUZT OF THE DEAN AND CHAPTER OF ST. 1• . .• PAUL'S, Dec 7. . - ADAMS AGAIN.? ADAMS. • 111111 was a snit of separation, by reason of adultery, broiled by the husband against his a ife. Dr. Bcanase opened the . pleadiags on the part of Mn. Adams. The evidence having been read, . Dr. latteitnoutox addressed the Coon on behalf of the husband. His Learned Friend (Dr. Burnaby) seemed is this case disposed to rely os the insufficiency of the proof of the adultery alleged against Mrs. Adams ; but be. thettribt the Court would consider that adultery was ne eellarity is be inferred from the combined latifCogrit Well the evidence showed to have subsisted between her nod a Mr. Potter. Indeed, there were three distinct enatere of transactions from which the Court would m ere at We conclusion. That Mrs. Adams on obe occa sion committed adultery with Mr. George Potter. was proved by's witness of the name of Ashdeo. He Ms served one afternoon Mrs. Adams waiting out Cornbillr sod, as he presumed, for her husband; but, to his great it, rrise, a gentleman totally unknown to him (the wit- ) nese) came upto 11n. Adams, took her arm, and by a cireuitons sort of route (for the parties seemed sensible tisk they were watched) accompanied her to Elbow-lane. itheretleur. entered a notorious brothel. if there was nothlog to impeach the credit of Asbd en, as the Counsel cooteaded there was not, the Court must be satisfied hid% the stvong presumptive proof on this point. But another witness, Charlotte Bond, deposed to .facts that too strongly corroborated the other testimony to leave a doubt upon it. It bad been laid dawn by Leitrim of au theffities, which it was set within the peter' of his lerned Friend to dispute, that in order to prove edit tery,i'.wai itot necessary to ipeelfy particular dues; end 11Satiety isfidlores ;, but dot If ell I'M cireemitanc,es, in tlitaissenft hod primate acts tended to establish a eaffier a eut case of suspicion, that was enough for all legal wpm*, This was mine especially ruled in " Elwes Pellsolft Muhl," and " Loven a. Lomdea," where the lateJodge of the Consistery Court Mid, " it is &come 'mem of this role that it is not necessary to prove GO foot of adultery in time and place." The next coarse of incidents was that which was involved in the proof, that Mrs. Adattor - Melded for some tune in . • I:mINT-row. Kingeland, at a. hoese in which Mr. (Large Potter wee also a lodger; having a room with n tertt-bp bed in it; that here he lived fur fifteen moults, during which period he was almost every day I , itiled:by e lady, whom be described ea his cousin ; and of whose identity', with Mrs. Adams, sufficient proof would be brought before the Court. Now. for what other purposes, but those o( a criminal connexion, these visit* could be paid, it would he difficult to guess : fur it was 4trpasesl, that she not only continued with him alone in tife:tonni fur many hours together, but would sonietioes rail open hint three tinies in a day!; and Patti, iometicomi left letters for her, addressed to her as "Mrs. Stanhope." l The third gee was this—it was shown that 11r. George Pottek being confined for some time in Whitecross- 1 street hum. was repeatiitly visited there by this lady:— a . • :semrant deposed to - illes. Adam 's habit of leaving Le se of a moraine, soon altiaLSlt. Adams had one out his haeires, and taking with hest viiiOus arti sof food and previston, inch as wine, oltrese."ffiga, &o. in a basket lest to bet by the deponent), and sot returuirig until a late hoar of the: afternotm. Witsess added. thht )ter mislrreit, en Nese Occasions used Grilles. herself in lk leer hest a and to take off the 6Am mita; lift so gone opt in orlon AIM returand home: having wit( to wituesi./fiy way of aceogatiatfor this conduct, a Itiog story about a hi r. and Mrs. Donvily, whom she deisslhed as very old ;: , , .44 - - _,. 4 . a,..-.~_-.~.~ . _ 7 1611iiiiialiii".• • - •.` • ..• , -)4 48 10•• , .. MUM i laSiia Ile then cniesal-lis witnesses. entwwwwwim After which the prisons: wasealled on for his defence Ile produces' i pest mduandous mess of papers, whi c h he began to pro. It wa s a ciremnstantial detail of the course heltioliiptsued,retativ e to the affair, in the court, of which; the 'proreedinp were stopped by 'he indispo s i, tisa of uosof the Jerre, a. After a abort time, the pe a , Orman rettirarsl,and the defendant proceeded literally o read a Isis tou 41(.1sis life, a nil hatlllrUptild not Mai lo ir the Counsel and 'Court, b ut b y t h e J ury, who t cola. mended him to corlfine himself to theanatter refrvant t o his defence. Ile subsequently took up a bundle of papers, and sald,-tureare fatty eppllcatioas mad. to the first act horities —ths King, the Meuse of Lords, S Hirst. J hairy ',thing Mare to ray; h re t h q are, and I am satisfied with what 11r. Prachey Mr. Peachry had Vreviosally given him a r ry 6t ,t Lb 'racier. 4.41 tingSfaS, M soorroing op, noticed the ere,t leuelli et ii,ue ,we had occupied, and put it to tue- Jury to 'Ay, whether tin papers were sot (mu and 'caw d4louslsbels. Th e Jury found the prisoner fiuilty. Mr. BRovellick, • wto had been counsel with M r r, Adolphus, now role, and was about to pray that a very trifling panietrusent might be awuded ; Tbe Worthy Ottaittesw however intimated. that he was nut thee disposed t4I pans sentence. The could not help noticing the iii;,nrwr in whi r ), th e fetwltnt had conducted hinvielf during his defenr, nut one wort of which in fact ),ore on the point. la ;Ta li, ty he had snhjettentlilmself to more than one pf li . cation. for mill Nutter charges than that of whieh he had been found" (hilt?, an I therefore the order Ore, Court %%es. That be aboald be imprisoned natil the esi of the Sessions, and then brought up far Ja.:lrment. . , . Bow STILUT.—Tas GAMS Laws.—On Saturd.ty, warrant mo issued spas tie deposition of a cons ume ' Informer, named Wive, to search th e h ots* of Richar d Day. ca oij Twitting is St. Mania's Lam. for Parton, a Patrol. wmt, accompanied be Wise, and' found in the old bed room, soma Pheasants and 'four hares, which with thy himself were brought beforo tits sitttng 31agisteate..M. 11 - 11insholl, ' Mr. Manstavt.t.6pod tie Defendant in the penalty f five pound% spy mokiand of game, mottling in the whole to iil. , • '. • . The Dery shot tbaimiid that be was totely incapable of paying the east. s Mr. Miasmata (a limpowered lry the Statute) issted• a we of vlisetesshiManter against the Defendanei lioode arul Chattels. Parton went to execute it ; and Wisr, and me of lit. eenslittors, pieked up the glow, which was *crewed about the ofiiee floor. and were wan, int off with it, when t gentleman suggested that the statute did net declare the forfeited game to he the pr.,. perty of the informer. bat left it entirely to the dispo,tt of the Magistrate. Mr. "Miasbull said flat woo initg true, and ordered the gads* to be conveyed to !O. tin's Work-house, for thelsenefit of rho poor inhtbitanls The Informers did not volunteer to carry it vise/, ltd . , dropped it on the fieor as • Mottgb they had Tti FL 4" fingers. e A tenon retanted'isitii a broker, whom ho had.= nyok 'to value the goede;eted the latter stated that the caul. ' all be could find belongieig to the Defendant was 9::* 141*, 6d. • Mr. Messocru. saki he most commit the Defeeda# for three months!, there not being sufficient to cora tie amount, then the issteds must go in part of . 11 4. 7tt t. ef the pen shies, and the Defendant be COSISIIIt r a certain period. Mr. Mcvsnuc sil.l the'ords of the , . AO irestilii in/ deficit of sufficient distress, the Defendant ahall 10 s alined Esc." and he *sold sot sysc•irtAM, and be imprisoned ton: • The Defendant nee menprairted for three womb., the Tothilfields Uri4ewtll.lttl there to be 14 9 4 1 . 1, 4 ,1 labour. - Way( Satranz.--Seseralay, John Carew, was t . hetore the `Sitting hiegistrit; with idling gem Cott: teary to the Act of Parliament,. lariat, ones/ the dismounted patrol, stated, that ea 'Friday night he wee** deny in the King's Howl, Uhrl• Mat whin he met the prisoner carrying a large sett.— He bad met bins repeatedly before, and learned that he vase regales. dealer in rame, which indneed hits. to =ogees he hid something ha the sack, that he wished to osulewal. He asked him muse questions about his loyi, hat he would lot gives direct answer, and he tried %%hit tha bag eolitaisell, when he found three hare shins An,i two hams saskiaged. He took the Prisoner and Lis lct4 1 to the watedebeam. 'rh.L astable hail keen employrd by a r^n• drawl , to carry the sack; he thought it contained bares, ►at considetedllie gentleman was qualified. He wowspoor men with a family dependint upon fits r‘- Miens far support, sad had been out of work a long. ti in% A Coostable said the Defentlaot was a noted higglor. sad. sold a great quantity of game that he had a set of regular customers whom he served with poultry, all around the pariah of Chelsea, St. lieorge's, Ice. The Megistrate o►served be had s ditty to perform ri the piddle. and hot hr might feel upon the be could not deviate from it. .The Defendant vraotmovieted In the mitigated penalty of b!. for each hii►e fband upon him. He could trot U'! the fiv. aid was committed for 3 mouths to the Homo eiCosroctios. • i s • —F0rT.t.n."..1.—.. • 1 ' DIARY FOR . THE PRESENT WEEK. 11,110 . 111111 TIMM 'Or EOM WATER AT L01160%-11111 1 : 17 t. ••• t Igit.=SW•ol,ll4 551,14. ATT. Ti n t. VOL D. V. " Met water--1111sit„ 14:m. aft:o; 'rec. 13 os. aft. I. 9, -MP-Moroi rises aft biro. High ester--none: 41 IL aft. 10; even. 10 s. after IL .19,E lhi-Jspitet-setsit S. eft. 13 non. • /14017ater--moree. 98 f. eft 11; eves. •111411:909. U. }V.—Cloak slow 6 win. La arse. . Jijtk water—morn. Ans. aft. 12; oven. 22 w. aft. 1"- rises 3 min, aft. S. . 1 *ith Tatar—isoru. Wag. aft. 12; Inn. 21 at. after I. .Lise.f. NEW MOON ST 2 AITIII3. 1 H water—morn:SO in. after I; area. IA S. al. 2. NI; iltldri setsts.V sit S netern. I High water--iporn. 26 in. aft. 2; oven. 2124.11 fr. t. • MARRIED. On tha.bilstast. at River. our Dover% by the neg. Jolts Manic, Henry Priairte Rroyores, E.q. to Aso Judith Linrio Factor. eldest daughter of t h e lota John Minot Feetttr, otPoeskr and Krarstoy-olobrY. . .oe.Saserday. at St. Paeans chunk Miss Oldown. of Tr tillteekidsose. to Harlon ht. AleirrorpiliootoofAleciorY• • '„ ON tbe.Stil interim- at the 'norther St. Matshow, city of GultirsAllsroy. Rsq. 04 daee. to Miss dem , Rowsell. the &I tlausbtor of Mr. Samuel Rorrooll. of the fut. 63 11V 1 6 4 14“ ' - I" • • • DIED. gnhent: Miss Wilson. ste,4l ^lorletl.lllh leritnat.' Mtbiehonor in Aron illessi4-sflfet WlDlvaiDleir; EAq. surgrou. I 1 ii 1117111101! 0114114 mess, .4... . k• • • • . , 111141,67 tett! '.l ',tett/I\lollo%l'os, J. Allis. SIX &ulliallsltalvsot. ' I • beelbliq %Ware; !MINIM;rk/ i Poßilleitiet . ' it reit vrili.4.4 );tiarrtio.l3rr fealfrooPliare ag teGoordPret•trois" Rioadte :Iropert) N•4ll2oilreuirts•lay ft; W Ls 0L1.11 1114 a Allassual eitereetzialawarrcedrb. ilerobiee VillatiPa t• be or/virtual& maAirreri ..•.~u - I k • r- F l OMEN soar OE ~„"'::= r----~ 0 NI R. by P Joni "fl no! end The 8651 ►end w 1 tom the SI R a