The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-03-06 00:00:00

IMPERI44 PAR L Lava! We desire peaty, but If we cannot She leuditiou•, the war must be , ascii year of war .our naval forces 'Without the enemy's naval superiority preteut it. LAND ARMY. The Land Army is composed Curd, which comprehends /0 regitnents and 44 squadrons; of 152 regiments 37 of light infa►►er), making 189 fiery, or 945 French battalions; of artillery ; of 30 battalions of the giments of cavalry, of eight companies pendent of four Swiss regimints, sir . meats, and severe) colonial battalions. I will not wok to you, Gentlemen, about tary or politicak events ; I can add aothhig to you know, arid *hat the Emperor told yob, in.& few words, but with so much profoundness. It appealed to me, that the simple expose of our interioi so f maritime, and rhilitary situation, were make the immt►nslty of our resources the solidity of one system, and the ► to a vigilant Government, whose Mots staidly consecrated to all which is grand to the glory of the empire. The firm resolution of the Sovereign equally all parts of his empire, and ' proceed in the same system of ewer grand administration, cannot but vas possible, the confidence and love faked' bear him. • 111101ISF. OF L(RDc, Magee 5. toe Otte of Athol and Ltird King took the oaths sued their OWL In the Appeal Cause. the " Rank of Scotland v. Watsoo,” Mr Samuel Ronsillv and Mr. Lerch were heard for the Appel lant, and the Att irney-tiemeral, as Leading Counsel, fur the illaspowdort. The LORI) CII A NICELLOR proposed Tuesday for the next haselog. but on at-emits, of the interv.-nint o t b ness, that day was definitively settl•nl nn the part of his ip. The Crown peMnrs' ItAief, the Salt Excise, the Cornish Mi sers Lilian, •ni, and a few ether, chiefly private, Bills, "ere in:t op from the Commons by air . Losaington, Mr. Ad tt, and Miter Members, and respectively read a lint doe. , ells, then prevailed .up. , claratious parties, . add ambiguous upon ~ and i. to restore the Princess to favour : find she was rtes b r a se a s out, to requ i re any suc h i n t er fe ren c e on mended explanation at lel:t ie :1 , v. the common to. cordingly again received at Court. Side° that time . the part of. Parliament ? The Hon. Gentleman him. contradicted rumour, it a that she had no material change had occured in her titillation, till se lf h a d ma d e hi s s t a t emen t i n suc h a m an ne r is to dressed a letter to the Kin g , i m p eac hi ng t h e pr . recently, when she had received a commenication show that heentertained no doubts upon the subject: ceedinge.ef the four Noble Lords who were h e from the Earl of Liverpool, by which she seas hi- y e t w h en ne ith er h e , nor any o th er Member, had Commissioners in 1806 ; and it should be remember. formed, that her accustomed intercourse 'with the any doubt' respecting the legitimacy of the Suc.. ed, that in• so doing, she was understood to be act. Princess Charlotte was to be abridged. This produced cess i he called upon Parliament to legislate. ing under the advice of Mr. Perceived. Lord Eld on her Royal Highness's Letter to the Prince Regent, : —it was p er f ec tl y t rue th a t th ere bad been no it was also stated, approved of that letter. The I and led to the late reference of the case tp certain prosecution entered into of Lady Douglas: her evi. i same was said of Sir T. Muter, now his Majesty' s Members of the 'Privy Council. In his opinion, the dence w as taken by the Commissioners in the die.' Attorney.Genirral, who, being present, co u ld cot: . four Lords Commisioners in had gone beyond c h arge o f t h e i r d uty ; an d t h e H onoura bl e G en tl e . ' tradict the asserti o n, if it we r e un t rue . H e w i shed their authority, in pronouncinl i lfeltitptilion on the • man should have stilted in candour, that the first to know from the Noble Lord opposite, wheth er , Princess's conduct, as they had done. The charge Cabi ne t re commended that no proceedings should be with the privity and knowledge of those persor-, against her Royal Highness was no less than High had unless the Crowe Lawyers deemed it advis. ! and for the purpose of making her Royci Highness's Treason. If, as biagistrat I t they had a right to : able t o prosecute Lady Douglas for perjury.-• Innocence manifest to the world, a work was oat examine witnesses to the facts, yet be conceived that A case was laid before them ; and though they were : printed, intended to be published, and circulated they had no right to pronounce either her condem- , satisfied as to the perjury, they nevertheless, saw ' throughout England and Europe ? When the Noble nation or her acquittal. That Report, therefore, A 8 great difficulties in the way of establishing it by legal , Lord talked *fan appetite for slander and calumny, far as concerned their judgment, he looked. upon as evidence, and, therefore, they did not advise prose. ' was he not aware that Newspapers had lately teemed of no effect in law. Lady Douglas's deposition, ; cution. If he were so disposed, he might use some with paragraphs and extracts, the tendency of whist who swore to the pregnancy in 1801, remained on- i grounds of personal complaint against the Hon. was to libel the Princess of Wales ? Was not •t . - , 7 contradicted. In what a state would the country' Member, for he had transgressed -the rules of his public mind in a state of agitation on this sueje ~ be placed, if this proceeding was again to be called parliamentary duty, in stating that Mr. Perceval had which it was highly expedient to allay? Nobody for, and the evidence of Lady Douglas produced ; prevailed upon the Cabinet to espouse the cause ofthe doubted that Lady Douglas was a perjered person ; 'while that of witnesses on the other side, could e r incess of Wales. The 'Cabinet had acted dell. but though that was not doubted, she still remained not, from death or other causes, be obtained ? ; berately and conscientiously in the business, ' a competent witness; and, therefore, some check. It was, therefore, the bounden duty of Puha. I acted deliberately and conscientiously in the h es i. ought to by put to the propagation of ambiguous lc. meat to provide against such an event. He call- i and had advised, that there were no r e asons ' ports. It appeared that her Royal Highness, fieis ed to the recollection of the House, that no pro. I why her Royal Highness should not be admitted . ing the Intercourse between her end the young Pri e ceedings had been intt:tuted agains i See John ! again to the presence of the Sovereign , agreeably tolcess was restricted more and more, addressed a lett, or Lady Douglas ; for defaming , cheracter the r eo ommeme i sti o n o f the former Cabin e t, w ith to the Prince Regent, which was rwice retureed e of the Princess. He thouget woe thee t , on e( ''al wheal -h it had osiglasted. The Hon. ! Nom- .opened . At length, it seems, it was read to b I servan t s of tie Prince Regent (eight. e l l e • •• e ,,,,,,,, Atiesee d el m a mas k e d emp h as i s i h m L a d Royal Highness, and the cold answer retarned w,p Princess oiples of all letters aadtar .1 4 1 t, der.freonsks4 7— by ea r ... ' 64 , iL ti t o stems... 1....L 7 5....5h0i5a - • tormaiweitiosetambrelmil , . her conduct since 1,806, as fa r , 6 .4 „,„ . ~,a , " at atgh egtz nice nt. a this scatter, Jam. That letter at last found its way WO the pa. alluded to in die proceedives on the' .; , seeped. A• 1 the Prince Regent followed the advice of Lord Thar. lic prints; sad then his Royal Highness, not as t' strict and impartial investig a ti on o f her conduct i low, which was to have the evidence reduced to Heed of his Family, but as Prince, Regent, ', ought certainly to take place. In the task he had ! writing, in order to submitting it to legal con- advice of Ministers, summoned a Privy Council i • undertaken, he was actuated only by a conscientious I sideration; Then his Royal Highness felt it to be consult what he should do : and the extraordinet sense of his duty as a Member of Parliament. After' his duty to communicate the charges to his Royal advice of his Privy Council to his Royal Highne various other remarks, the .Hon. Member concluded I Father, with whom, and with whose Cabinet, and was, not to refer to the present conduct of the Prii • by moving two Resolutions. The first was of great i not with his Royal Highness himself, the whole cess of Wales, but to the evidence of 1806 or 71--- length s recapitulating the con t en t s of all th e reports affair bad from that time remained. He could really Was there ever- advice so preposterous, and so cruel and papers concerning her Royal Highness, The see no necessity for pursuing the subject of this dis- The levities of her Royal Highness in , 1806 were tc, second was for an Address to his Royal Highness cussion any farther.. It could not be properly be punished in 1813, more severely than wee thou& t the Prince Regent, praying his Royal Highness to , brought forward, except on the presumption that necessary in former years, by increased restrictiot lay the whole of the documents iefeare the House, some doubts existed relative to the Succession to the and restraints! Mr. W. then adverted to the opinia together with all other papers i Active thereto, Crown ; and he trusted, that in what he had said, lately given by the legal advisers of the I'rinh Mr. J. wurtwroN seconded the motion. be bad convinced the House that no such doubts did Regent, which had but recently been made known ; Lord CASTLEREA,GII rose and said, he felt : e x ist. Calling for further information, if agreed to, and which stated, that, according to their exper,- that he should act most consistently with his duty in ! would only be the means of gratifying private curio- ; ence, cases not of grater Import might be sent to confining himself to explanati o n, with respect to city, by making Parliament the instrument of pro. a Jury. Here, then, it would appear, there must parts of the Honourable Member's speech, which . cur i ng that gratification, that taste for calumny, be doubts as to the succession to the ,Throne ! would tend to gua r d th e [l ouse agai n st those false i which was so much the rage at the present moment. ! When the Noble Lord and his Colleagues framed impressions which it might otherwise excite. The Ile should trust to the indulgence of the House, to ' their last Report, had they not all this before them ? mode of proceeding adopted by the Honourable ' ex pl a i n f ar th er i n reply, in case other circumstances lf so, let the House see what this Cabinet did, who, 1 Member was somewhat gingoiar, nig first leeeolu. were touched upon, which might render farther es. in 1807, pronounced a verdict of entire acquittal oa tion was, i n f ac t, e ' en i n hi s own v i ew of it, without planstions necessary r and he hoped that the House , the part of her Royal Highness, and who fastened I any proof. Hi s se con d se eso lutio n called for those would not tolerate suspicious or doubts, where none such serious imputations on her in 18131 By the very Papers, es matters of information, on which his whatever existed, by adopting the motion of the Hon. I first Resolution was fou n ded; as if they were mat e . Gentlemiiis advice of Lord Eldon and Mr. Perceval, so it was I understood, the Princess of Wales threatened pit b.. terss of certain knowledge. He did not mean to ' Sir SAAI UEL ROM ILLY commenced by observing, ' licity to the former proceedings, and then she was re urge it in the way of cavil against the proceeding, that the Hon Member (Mr. CutkraneJohostone) had indulged admitted at Court. Her advisers must s at that period, but surely if there were any grounds for the &so- hi m , if ~ , terms of such strong censure of the Admiuistration have been fully persuaded of her innocence, or they lutions, the second should have been the prelim'. of taigl, as to render it iinpossible fur him to preserve silence. never would have recommended her to risk such a nary one; as the first, in its order, could by no No Imo who knew them, would throw the slightest shade of ' publication to the world. Mr. W. then commented possibility be adopted by the Hoeft, The only oh,' diserspect or suspiciou on the conduct of those four Noble on ,the various circumstance. connected with the ject of the information called for, seemed to be to per- Lord., obe composed th.t Commission of Euquiry. With transactions of 1807, when a unanimous opinion waf . suede the House, that such Serious doubts existed as resp e cth•ito i l o L?l i airlf, hr . had to say, that he was coo I d " 31 - by jelared, that ssU she particulate OM - Princess's con - to the succession to the Throne, as rem_est • theritla ; I. . Ro ya l Highn ess 1 - it b eved, select Oesi ed for that purpose,,by duet, to which any character or colour ofcrieditality raerforence of Parttanteree He shifild not enter Into • the'tveomine dation of th e l a t e L or d Thu r l o n, that h e might could be ascribed , were either satisfactorily contra ny detailed enquiry as to the legality of the Privy gin his umakii on this very delicate investigation. eater dieted, or rested on evidence under such circene Council acting as a tribunal in their proceedings on . h . seirig cou l s a e i t ti t ere;l it with the Mount care and anxiety, be ad• stances as to render it unworthy of credit. This war This subject; but he would state, that he was per,. a meets en the e m r at o te h r i! in i Dgr i ni ii he ig r hn t els mii;. cni A t f il ter i lle g ghalsee%e:liiiii; ! a complete verdict of not guilty. The sine had fectly satisfied, that they were fully competeitt to opinioe, his Royal Hi - took , t o sses t o so . i been previously advised to receive her Royal thigh- ness, - with* a reproof for her unguarded conduct; but those Ministers advised no reproof, and called on his Majesty to restore her, and to receive her at once, in the manner due to ber culled rink and station hi the community! But now, in 1813, was raked up the old evidence of 1806, by some of those very persons, hi order to defame her, sad punish her by additional restrictions I Ought else to submit to these imputations ? Ought sot that Moon to interfere ? The Noble Lord, indeed, had eb. served that any of her Royal Highness's legal advisers who chose to de so, might come forward in her behalf. There was a •time when she did not want legal advisers—when Mr. Perceval, and Lord Eldon, and others, were her legal Advisers ! But one of them was now dead and the others had be `if • - I ' - • ' -. „ , • . . . ' • % ' • • t• - .• • • • ' "'' I RS . .' 'i' . 1 . , , . .. „,.., ... ... ...„_ ••••• ••• ....- ......... -......-- ..... ' -••••••-•-• .- - - - - ' - • - • • • • f, , . ~. ~_,... , . t have it bet eit 1 ' THE Pitlivedal or ,-, - 4 4.4 .. ' 11l OW Ca".ll. Raft ' . . the antberit . e of the Ifni, denev aerimo e codtineed, Owl I , —"••° • .--., • , •, . „ei„. WO •pe ;be basallot do& ~... , .. Iles, siweemoseasesof emerge of Eligli to ' altd th at SOL I n* ComselesimierSio ie., free ".." 15.11 " 1, 1 h 5 " 401.44 "riots , r ow t deneels e s% cue will Increase, 'While the Gallery was nteared, . , • 1 10 4" . ''' . ity being able to moved the Standing Order; and ft - lle* • ' . sad 11101 kit 1 of she meaty of syd s g easat oar o i st ase s sa i I opened. .., -.• .• . 1 . 4 .,. eia am, epee that gai rssi t rt il. l . 4 flakseer proceedings? filo maa, be believed, w h o a11 ,,„ 1 . 1, ft. ! Mr. BENNETT repeated his modes efedteorste : esti ' „.4 . isle. doubts with she dotty begilkilseme the Lop leriry — EZ* ~ v s nsiters. wield Mimed saebia oessellisi It • --•• of the Imperial meat, stating, that he did so.nttrely le park , 11 ,.....di15".• . ,:a„ . . • ~.. ' • the eirdos * a ar d, a . tats a u m atu re ~, a 5f1 0 000 ,u, 1 7 41 'hotter „ ea t s o f i n f oo a rg ow it o bau s a iv . of all fijili wor I, ' . . w They did i n o rwod iai r iase thee roferred thew se she reeeke teilmasie foe trial " . 're sof the line and ' optlos was 4 tlifilloi. ii . H a lo ', ,ffise*areilibt the ine of 'Lady Mad ease, ter in folt Merge* eika o t. o . ; ow lig ht regiments of in.., 'Mr. COCK 11 JOHNSTONE sib,* resr•—'!. . ; ditepased with, or eonts‘eled te, that t i Cooacil &god tbe weloao to be lessee; sae s o i0 ,, e ,7b/ of lyregiments 4 . His motion , be stated, attended endrely with him. ; tr im lir *Olson i bet y that thep had 1 elegem wave hostketed ageism her. tlir Seated RoZ li ft at vane itenetb, in reef el' theOt t wi n n e. i . -7 train ;of 90:re • self, without any osenewsketlen with other porton'. OO4OO blistery of the dlisi ctit so etsespl it ;W ale : rea.mui ;r d zocil be (sue % set a ; s te e ibea w : ibuleas tof epiaii. -- e imt 4i ore for lb. Isaias each, inde. He'even did not knew that he should And ens Mum . !OA seulagoopors that ae pe w= could re. i eaten speeded, of ebie s ts,, be tunneled, as cbete I; six ferrite regi. her to second it. He bad transmitted to the Priocestaillt that It teai n na b ons of the in.s. : of Wales, and to the King's Ministers, a espy of het of souther ,erouutn e mood Siphia Austl44;.. .Nor, 1 thli ° 44l " "I" to be "iatived• ' men about mill. ' the Resolutions be intended to propose. He dims Weed, did thkosablits oat Only On *lir Report, i Mr. ,wiltraßßAD observed, that the lies, tit ha :71, mu. . wise afterwardi referred to ether ertelldeettel Member who bad Weight forw7 a d ni_ t et he prese n t g ao;king to what referred to the Report made by the Commissioners 1 ~r it old yob, io ii few ' 1 of the Privy Council, at the command of Ma M a. &tribal§ 4 his Ilfidext mho Live a eolemajedg. • thus had stated his intinthe to Mm ; and he ho e( eft Mae It appeared ! jelly, in 1806 ; and the authenticity of whi4it s be Meat s 10.segiudes the_ port of the gra commis . : tol d him, that he thought his int tutoktion coal ir interior, of our i said, he was enabled to prove at the bar, if rewired alootrip. , The supposed t t ee h t r ispeeting the sewn. ! not be adopted. 'He, therefore, did not rise i s se • were sufficient to ; to do l so . lie' read over the charges made Oust I den, wet, therefore; rebelled bj the isetkortty of the ' port of it, for he concurred in much that ha d fillPe. es comprehended, 1 her Royal Highness at thit time, and man f the ! first Commiseletten ef the first Ciabliset ; and also from the Noble Lord opposite; 4 1 , 9 thanks we owe ' particular items o f those charges, with t eon.] by that of the subsequent Cobinet , to whom the mat. this period at least, no such motion should W t ot er . labours are con - eluding Report. The princess, he stated, hetit was referred, and who confirmed the same judg • bitted by the House, as might re n de r it t h e vehiet , on es doubt found its Way into the mind of of communicating to the public at l arge , t h ose ma . grand sod useful ! receiving a copy of that Report, ad d resse d a letter , mot. If any Ito his Majesty, a copy o f w hich he read, (this I Parliament, he would mot deoy, in the abstract, that tars which-it was much better should be supisresse . to the question of Succ exist, as easion, He must; however, ,envied the N o bl e L or d o f h c ereign to 'protect 1 letter was of considerable length) the a uthenticit y Ino case is ad to constantly 1 of which be was also prepared to substantiate.— which it be the duty of Parliament to examine ; expression of his readiness to make explanation Plow/ and of the ! The letter alluded to the malice of her enemisis l —to 1 but would Honourable Gentleman say, that after particularly with respect to the mere recent par redouble, if that ' her not being called upon to make a fair deftMce,-- I all those authorities which ha had stated, it would of these transactions. If the House dismiss( be re g ular ra ti ona l f or Parliament to interfere ? this abject without' any ne which all his and to the parties not being credi ble wkintises.- 1 1 or That Report was signed II the four Lord. car, 1 Weeld net such interference rather serve to originate or Procoedingll, the Privets et Wales would, Grenville, febil amble" whereon *mists existed ; and totte ted etion e ..)111. Wad, be G rossly injured. it s :loyal Big Mil Fi t • • 1807, a ; Erskine, and Ellenborough. image took place in his Majest a Conn. ° tellies. to eesplcien re s, etbetrary to the • del oess complained to thse,:i.,. • et Sa t ._ cite, and Mr. Pewees-al then prevailed. !pro the King clarations of all parties, tisk no case whatever had add ambiguous blame thrown open her, and d : . . EAST INDIA AND CATHOLIC QUESTIONS. The Earl of DI KB Y presented a Petition from the Merchants, Traders, and others, of the Borough of Preston, Lancashire, agai►►st the continuance of the East India Company's Monopoly, and observed, that tne P•ririoners wished to be heard by their Coutiael or Agents, in support of their allega. Lion• His Lordship presented another Petition to the eam...tfect, from h.:hum-under-Line, in the said _comity, which being read, was, with the foregoing, ord Ted to lie on the table. Lord Viscount iII:MOUTH, by command of his Royal Highneis the Prince Regent, presented lists of the names of those Roman Catholics who hare taken the oaths under the R,elevant Ac's, in pursuance of an Address of their Lord- ships. The , ce documents were, on the motion of Lord E"S (ON, ordered to be printed for the use of the lo the course of a few words intarcbanga. bw tweet, the girl of RA DNOR andel. LORD CHAN- CELLQR, in a low tone of voice, upon the point, the litter Peer stated he should be in the House be fore ten o'clock on Monday (th• farther considers. tion of the case of the Banbury Peerage being fixed for that hour), but as to the attendance of other Peers, he could not so exactly answer. Lord HOLLAND presented a Petition from the City of Exeter, in favour of the Catholic Claims, expressive of the concern of the Petitioners at the efforts making to counteract them, and praying for the establishment of full liberty of con science. Lnr! RILLE (who had on a former evening pre sented a Petition of a contrary nature from the same city) observed, that the Meeting_at which an adverse Petition as voted, was one of the largest everknown in fiat city ; and took notice, that some of those whe appeared to have supported that now presented by the Noble Lord, were then against the Claims of the Roman Catholics. Lord HOLLAND stated, that with respect to the individuals alluded to, they had been opposed to these Claims, under the mistaken notion that the oaths re quired by the Acts, which the Catholics of both Eng land and Ireland now freely took, were those which they wanted to get rid of. Agee a few farther words in the way of explanation I)et %seen these Noble Lords, the Petition was order ed to lie oat the tabre, and the ibille,iidjouraed till 4. • • Monday. HOUSE OF COMMOVE. Mr. Risotto;ph and Sir C. Pole brought tip the Report et the Pembroke Election Committee, declaring Sir Join Owe, duly ; and Kr. Cartirright brought op titg Report Do the Lt. titer pita Beetiop, deelaries Mr. tempting and General gseisoyee defy MOW. • Mr. S IVOSTLEY brotaght spa Bill foe affordin Relief to Inso!vast Debtors, tootloed in thilthifs Beath and Marsha sea Prisons...44M s trot time. . , elighaels . . every possible i Colonel WOOD moved Abe second reading of a enqu i re, w h et he r t h ere uere, or were not,"selliiiiist . villain what credit w a s d ue to th e parties, whine instinsowy Bill, the object of which was toalter a Mamie in the I groun d s o f c h arge f or putt i ng the Brincess of wales b ad i beeu Itive.a. In the change of Adusiiiistratiou whieb. Brecknock Canal Bill. He wished the &lII° be o adtli a eurof ec e e p i tr i d s Soh. lon her defence. 'rho presen e s t motion, however, irr.ily fol r hi s r . ed, an t e ihn atrc h h uso lst 4 f ::: in suf f ered to go to a Committee, where its merit's '. did not go to the extent of settling the question, jeatea commands to confer with Lord Thurlow on this might he discussed. If, when before a Committee, ; whether any such proceedings were, or were not, : important business. Lord Tburlow desired bins kr ten. Dither of the parties concerned could prove e dispo. I tore much too , the Prince of Wales, that the information was of a es necebsary. But he must say, that if the Commis. sition on the part of the other to establish a mono. . important fur his Royal Hi boon not signers were not competent to decide upon the °to taltb some prosier steps in consequence. TLis be poly, against such monopoly he should vote. . I charges against her Royal Highness of being pregnant . cominue t cate d to t 6 Prince of Wales, sun in a short , Sir CHARLES MOR.GAN voted, its an amend.; in the year UPI, the House of Commons was cer.. • shoe afterwards, the facts as stated, were submitted to some of swot, 'that ' he Hill' should bethe King's Minister . An asthoiity wits thew issued u nd er read I secuud time 0 0 ' "winly not the proper tribunal for deciding on such a .. that day six months.the King's Situ Manuel to certain Members of the Privy quelition. It , on the other hand, no actual stimisas , ceased t o • • • discussion, is which Lord A. S e moor t a ke the investitation of the whole of the case, moors lity Iss imputed to her Royal Highness, that House ! m any m i nt i Mr. Harvey, Mr: Lewli,. Mr. J. P. I was equally an tthe only other per. ots were held, and amity witnesses were examined .mproper tribunal for deciding onl ,snaps, sod be (Sir S. Sunnily) was see Hon. ,timbers RerdelPeted; the I that question. If, again, every shade in the doss.; emend besides the C,or ti misainner ~ at thesiexaminall &&&& %, cleared for a division. ' ' .. duet is,' the Princess of Wales, from the highest db.. Which were co n d ucte d b y t b e f our N o ble Larch mentioned, rs Tete-- gree of guilt down to the lowest levity , were to be and he took d uwa a ll t h e deposito tuquiry was ever co_lidecteions. He must declare in on dividing, the numbe the moat outruns ,tisane , th a t n d etieigittlieent - - ' " 164 - e 'tiered that Ifnot- —-, ons; nese was ..- impartiality, ' 93 where such matters - 1- Majority . 07 also User's, therefore lost. onions exist ed ... tiiiriti wal ever, strangert were not the Royal remit ' the 'Gallery, ibis e ßfandtag . Oriier • Cometons could -, haring been veered by Mr. Pen- augnsetit The 04heinit Johnithine thesi biete rs :b his` iii i tiki pn ina dlsessied sla &se • 1.:L.4:n ..61'.1 6 A l' t; tt:sr.4 k;.;•• - 4* S:. After a cliseussio ; Mr. Protherne, M t fara.:t, and other' Gallery •%1 es claire We u 'NV' sinful, s . r , r the Ai Agoinst It Maio The SW *as the it • Wien the illtiti a r g r at 4 a r ditt emb admitted to o ti n otion' Vihita Na • • •••••-• •••••••• uttouter, HUM DU vuira try wino .vc. •••••••••••.•• that !louse as not, certainly, the placewith Mob" impartiality, ear was there ever evinced o more come mute I He had deci;reilast night,' w that if no h matters should he discussed. He must aaaiuus desire to diseherice justly s erreepubtle duly. With one else did, he would stand ap t not as her ad#o- - that if ally unfortunete ilimmtes or dis 4, ra-cliriot the asPm:6l°Z Institutio to slats, l a tuc t e o r eat r a ili t ", cats, . but for the cause of jostics. She iggitt lift to iced between any mentbitrs Or khocholt of the 4 Se:: vrg d i d so t aria hoes „y be the only person in this coootry t so fused for its Family; any disc ussinn in the Moose . or doubts of the vied of the Ceiensissiosers tor administer in huinanity • without a Wald, or al krt altirer -- could only serve to increase:4H** •to, *Mho trie sumo persousisul iiistoestrvt, sot todasd trout What 'yours. woo loft to bee but am Pm id to the che evil, and I. w id en the ' b ris4i d o at o to ithottier 141 Imo , Ipsniu way "p ee &he, but r justice of Parliament!' Her request to ine Prima, PractlCargrellnll4 t ' h4t a l ef° ,_" ll : 9 _d_ n4 ,_ /1101 4 • NI. timutil l "' d rirl"" 4 ""sk, "" ; -...""are pose ll Vas i cer tili t it Regent wawsimusi OW of Amos Bolles to Hooey r e "Ox uRs 1 4 11 16 MOON bon Al Wails*" pfif ustaiesd u Wl* &K b... die las'ildity l or admit me to be T . • ti tl 1 1 1 MK