The Statesman. — London, England, 1812-12-09 00:00:00

, ;1 •, i 1 : 1 • ,i ! ' . i I r Y 1 1 .i ; E ...` . , 1 ~ ~ , P : 1 1 fi' ) , I I. , ~ • , •1 ' 1 . • . , . f, 1 ,1 4 II i ' .- 1. ' • .. ) ; • 6 ~., i l l '. • P i 7 i i ; t II .0' i 1 IM 110 :1 • Al • . . t ' . ' •1 t .• ,' 1,, : I: 1•••• • I I- , • * ) 1 i If • 1 1 1 i' i, ; 1 I • 1 1 Y k , I.' i•i i . 4 ' , .'J i • . i ' • . I . I i 1 ( 1 ~a i t 1 ii i i ; , •',, ' ' 1 i II , • , • , • l' .. . ; * '• 4 ' I - `Or \ .rnn. t #• -.. INNS mosi= 0121141;16 "" i f. " • ^ . Lif WINISJAIAMFOry, ~., ~ „ THE DECEASED EXILE. --40—= .... c . • --",.! r ... , . ~ . --..0,-,.- .;'.:-. ,:to ... ,1. , .- 0.• .TO THE 991TOit OF Tim. STATESMAN. • • :. COUNTOF KING'S BENCH, XE5T14.11414,,n5c. 5 . Six, —lt is now about two years since I II?. Awn RING v: cotinf ANN TittltTir:rofui vinous; eervo.l it rentioeed in . your Pa p er, that Mr. MA*, "'fhb wasan indictineut charging the Defendants, whfr are journeymen-carriers, with a conapihicy ,to outorr, who, sixteen years ago,. 101 .banished 40. ' 1 si their wages. • • liwtany Ray, by the Cour t of Justiciary at Etliit- 1 i.lye, PAIK halting stated the cane on the part of y, cud IN -, ptasecutiaa, a dd uce d a w ie ness4 who proved ii. brought with him alive a farourit4 CAI , which had, 1 denspiring together' on the part of eleven of.the Deal burgh, for ‘Pditiai4 bad r eturned to this countr accompanied him in his voyage outwards. On en- :IPalidants, to compel , their masters to agree to * acrd‘ Miensr. rateof wages Cum Abut litlieito allotsed ; that , w qui , , I found that your st a tement was correct, I the proposition of the journeymen to -the waste, 1 that poor plss had become a very interesting object, was rejected, about Um .I,oth• of.,March Lasts and Its hoalth as anxiously and as regularly ea. , w hich 'the whole of the journeymetr a t t ack, ex quirell aft 'r as that of its worthy master. ; those to whom their masters agreed to allot:th ad-. ill The melancholy task is no w y oar's, Sir, to an. ; mince; and that they co or ntinued to ,refuse to nin the prk t ' attune, the death of tins Exile—an event which hap. within t a n last seven eight weeks, being, petted on the 13 th ins t ant ; a nd as the virtues of rho' mean time, supported out of funds p reviously c ? - lected for the purpose and having tickets, by whtet . deceased hay' , bt-et , thought worthy of a monumental; they ..vere enabled to live free of expense, into what inscription, 1 geld you enclosed . the copy of an ever part of the country they chose tog o, being Epitaph, written for the occasion. by Mr. MA liaA- ; thereby certified to their country brethren as per storr hims?lf, who could best appreciate the merits' sons deserving of support. About seven or eight of this faithril companion in his sufferings, and Weeks since, however, they had all returned to their 1 dot • an' wl.ifh, I trust, will be considered worthy a. place , . In your Paper. . . ord EtAtmaonoucu here suggested the g reat justice being thus attained, whether it mig h t I am, Sir, respectfully, -• • 'not bo sufficient to take a verdict against those eleven Nov. els, 18.2. lIMEVOI4III, ; versons, and to allow them to remain as hostages for the good behaviour of the trade in general, not to be brought up for judgment, e xcept in the event . . • . .. Niter this spot are depot:teed the remains A loving Mother ; A kind Nurse • and se affectionate and dutiful Servant who selther guihy. nor eve* accused of crime, was for many years btutished fruin her native Country s, and, Uncomeleet. whither travellin a cquire mnated the (Mahe. No wealth did she or inherit ; vet lived and died free from debt. Always clean and neat in h r attire ; during a long life her favhitin she alt. red not. Unpractised in slander, and a ;Altera la the sex, She was without vice:— Yet, mistake not licutle *tender, Ibis lascriptien Is Dot meant fur a Woman, but a Cat, Which departed this life cm Frilly, the 17t% of November,lBl2, aserl Eighteen Years Ten himith , and Seven Days. Alas poor Pups I of the conspiracy being -- •tirtastinUetl, or breaking eat afresh. This humane suggestion was cordially embraced on both sides, and a verdict of Guilt!!, against the eleven persons especially pointed.out, was taken, subject to the above understauding. . • Cant. CON. CHAMBERLAINE :. naQOMIIEAD. This was an action of trespass, by which the Plail• tiff, a gentleman connected with the packets sailing between this country and Lisbon, sought to recover from the Defendant, a Lieutenant in the Navy, a compensation in damages, for cimival conversation with the Plaiutiff's *ire. L The SOLICITOR GENERAL, in stating the case, admitted that the case was not one of an ag gravated nature, or where the Jury could feel them svices called on to give any thing like great damages. The wife was a person whom any husband must wish to get quit of, a n d the.l.tefendant was somewhat to be pitiet in having !alien into such an unfortunate connection. The object of the Plaintiff in bringing this action, was not so much to recover damages, as to be enabjed to go for a remedy elsewhere ; and also toquard against the thrusting upon hiMof a spu rious offspring; it having been given out that his wife WAS with child by the Defendant. From the evidence, it appeared that the. Plaintiff and his wife had not lived together, nor even seen each other, for scvetai years past, the Plaintiff hav ing till" lately resided in Lisbon, whence he had sent his wife home, in consequence of hcr misconduct, several..years ago. She appeared to be an . bandoned character, and a habitual drun)tard ' • and that &la' Defendant, who lodged in the same house with her, was not the ottly person with whom shd hall been connected. The hnsband, hoWever, it. appearett, : : bad not abandoned her to prostitution, but, that the sum of 61.21. 6d. was paid to her by au Agent, regd. laity, every month. Lord Fa.t.vtaclove.s, when the case had pro.' seeded so far, said, he could not advise the Jury in the exercise of a sound discretion, to give more thou nominal damages, and the law would not allow . thesi I to give less. Mr. ilaouanast submitted that In such a case, the, Defendant was entitled to a verdict. What he west , ' upon was the separation of the parties for a numbee. of years. • Lord Et.i.xxsottot:Gu asked was the separationisy. writing ? Mr. BROUGHAM admit ted it was not. Lord ELLENeottouott said, if the separation was not of such a nature as to have occasioned an actual cessation of the controul which a husband had over his wife, he should hold that such separation was no ! bar to the present aetioa. His Lordship had. stated ! by anticipation what he should lay down as the law of the case, and if the Learned Counsel were not sa tisfied, he might file a Bill of Exceptions to the laws so laid down. 1 Mr. BeottonAst begged, in a few words, to be al towed to state to his Lordship what he should be able to shew were the facts of this case, and having taken his Lordship's opinion on the effect of them, he surely should not consume the time of the Court i in entering into any evidence if his Lordship should !be of **loft; that•the.facts purposed to be giveo in evidence would not. avail hint. What he purposed showing was this, that, in consequence of an act of adultery committed by the Plaintiff's wife six sears ago, in Lisbon, he bad separated from her, and sent • her home to this country. She first wetti to Exeter, where, after remaining some time, she had come to town, and lived in a variety.of . houses, some of them of very indifferent fame ; being treated 'by her hos : bauct-qeite as an abandoned person, and one with lachoin he neither had, nor woulg, have,. eny Inter ; Course. The Plaintiff_ had been twice in this coun stry previous to his. final return to it from Lisbon, and ton neither of those Occasions had he enquired for or I seen her. i Lord • F.i.Lrmnostoecn bald., unless the licence of the Plaintiff could be shewn to have been given to the abandoned life of his wife, all. that -the • Learned Counsel had stated would notite suf fi cient. All this might happen to an innocent husband, forced to separate from his wife. Ilis Lordship : was not prepared to say, that the Plaintiff` was that negli gent husband, who, by his own act, was precluded rom the pteseet action. If the Learned Counsel ished, however, to re-agitate all that had pissed this '-ct , his Lord Ship should laydOwn ;law From the LONDON GAZETTE, Dec. 8:- Lord Chamberlain's Office, Der. S. Notice is hereby given. that the Levee inteated to have been held by his Royal Highness the Prince Rogent, a' Carlton /louse, on Thursday, is post poned till Monday next, the 14th instant, at two o'clock. BANKRUPTS. W. Hopwood. Westhorae, Some ~ fellosonger, to surrender ; Dec. 11. 12, 19, at the OnlphM Inn. Chichester. Attor. • ate Me• Prise. and Freeland. Chichester. J. BIB!. eect, tilackwe.ll-hall factor. Dec. 19, 19. an. a , (litildhall. At.ord.rs, Actors. Wilde and Knir.l ll , C one-greet, vairm-squa ,, . N s Ilardry, kiverk 'ol , • -,••rcti Dee. '.lz, 19, Jan. 19, at the TM, Tavern, Liverpool. A ttrir. , l•.c, 'fir Pritt. Liver. Eno,; ,and Messrs. Blackatock and Douce, Protr.h• it:kings, • w. Ti t o • iwon. rreouside, Sheffield. whitcsmith, Pee. 15, 22. Jan. 1 1 , at . Lonlon. Attorney , Mr. 'ATl,;.ite, Belvi dere 1, George s, Southwark. Blokeley, Woad-street, warehaesentan, Dec. 12, V, jag. 19, at ' Attaniey, Mr. Ilarticy, New Bridgwstreet, BlackfriArs. . 1 Ch:yawn, !lath, carpenter. Dec. 21. 92, Jan. 111, at the tie. ls int and t:astle. Bath. Attorui..s. Mese% Pearson and 800 Pum,s-camrt, Temple; and Mr. Taylor, Bath. K. Tosley, Glonco.stcr. curo-dcal•T, 10ec, 2/ 1 99, Jan. 19. at the Booth.hal Inn, Gloucester Attorni s, Messes. Wtcombe and ing, S e rkant'i lon, Fleet-street ; and Mr. C. Ward, (Iloitcestrr. S. Wailers and T. Attwond, 0141 , wInford, - Worcestershire, anvil-makers. Jan. 6,7, 19, at the. Gorge 100, Bewdley. At-' torary, Mr. .:oliers, Stonthritige. $: F. Patterson, fire. .t Polten -v-street. Colden-square. bill brßters. pee. li, 19, Jan. 19, at Attorney, Mr. tieorge-sireet, Prirtman.square. 11..lones,12icznirtemm, shoemaker. Dec. 11. 13. Jan 19, at the Swat Tavern. Ilirining.ha , .l. •*tiornies, :%irlirs; Devon a nd 'Tooke, Holborn-court, titay's lout and Mr. G. Burrish, Birmingham. C. Coop r, sultan f'oldlleld. "Warw'rkshire, enal.master, De:, 11, th, tan. 19, at the 'there Tom, S•itton Coldlield At toro'es. 'lessri. Sherwin and Hall, f Teat 'amen-street, Bedford. row. .f quasi. Ha ton (Garden, exechaat. Dec. 12, V, J.-n. le at C••:Idhalt„ A torney, Mr. Shaw, St tole Ton. C. St. llhan's,wtoe inerch nt, Dee. 12, 15, .fan. 19, at uiMhaU. Attortry, Mr. IL Woodhouse, lnp Tcciple. . T. BArker, Dower. draper, Der, 15, V, Jas. 19. at b•ill, Lan•lon. Attortties, rani. Wiltshire, Boltop, and Wes:, Old.Broad.crret. J. Allardice, Goudnit-street, Swallaw.street. lines-draper, 1/rt• 15, 9, Jan. 11). at luildhall. Attorney, Mr. Laagley s Chariot t r.sirres, died ford.wrlaye, W. 41. Sc, silk.roansfaetnrer, Dee. • 11, 12, .tan 19, at st,lhr.a. • Ittinliti, Mean. 80. 1 4d 11101) and Ileni.t. LiUltsFriday-secret. • - - - „,s ••• • ' O f t,. • kt, E. Ct;iman, N or% iell, hallentloher—net. t 9. J. Jtvellna td ll•grig, Mrtningitim, fictors —Dec. :10, C. Wild ro rsr, and • 'atoll, illoucestenhirr, goal.merchani.— J 15, S. Cliet.le, 111.rck•nan-.treet, So.ithaark, ro:e., le, R. ;from-mi. large-end, Statardshire, earthenware. raamfacturer —Dec. 29. Je.eeek, St. l IliintingdottAire. s p i n , 0 , 14 4er _pai l , 0. W. Squire. f hmier —.lan. 9,' J. • ltrosth, 1% Le aod 11. L.. 'Louth, Austin-friars, met chla:s lan. ( 27, Si. Sartiell. Alirrate, butcher—Dee S. 1). , le nester, Sornerscolsire. inerebant—ltee. SO, M. Moore, • • •'Teat. yare.uuth, Norfolk, chirniman —jam 9, M. IL7.t,:sM. itherrtira, 1 2.4 M. 'Barter, Red” Lion -,tifkort, Flemz‘trert,,, b!cioalsars—Pac. 30, J Howther and W. Woo , F.trter, a ine-uirreir.itts—Ore. 211, J. Norton. litoxlan,.l (httelsbire. innholder—Dee. 21, C. Dycke, Barton-upon.: l Tr .pt„*affltdsitire, hntche/ 77 1,au,.13. T. Lone, BAtniph-latie, uMina—.lan. T. Blackhttfi, Monat-street, Whiteetat pet,' master-mariner—Jap. T. Hooke, Renfro, liertfordshire, farm. r -.lan. 12, A. Varie3u Founder's-court, merchnnt—Jag.i b, V. R.lL4teison and W. Bond, Upper roamed street, bat-ma- a4f .ctureot - , Jau. f, W Stoaelpridge, Colchester, grocer—Jan. . 1 . F;'.(saerdwin, A Nehisrei-tane, tav-rn keepet--Joa. 5, ' row. and J. Forrester, Savage. *edema, wine-mrreltanti.-- Atkins, Popes-heari-Alcy, l tursi.s-bruker—Jan.9,- /.11.4a0 Kingston, Surriy.' mitt& et ft FIFIDIS,TES—Devi 29. C. t farchaot, GloncestroatMet, Quees-squat?. stationer—l: 2 my. Portorcollopst4firi—A. Settlibak* Vauxhall, iron lan. ger —J. Presetis, Curistchurch, Surrey, bricklayer—A. SIM, Ou ter-laor. tailor arks, A r2ndel-street, Strand. paper. ! maker —W. Wow, 11000011arrey..0•111co-printer Ilawsois, l .Aldgata lliesoteret.linen-draper—T. Okell,tireat Quern-street, ' 11Aarnia' laa-Selds, linen-draper-P. Lock, Nailsvrorth, estershires yarn-maker. - PARTNERSHIP!' DISSOLVED. •Y:.. W. Wad. and W. Monitory. Cannon-street, pine-reeidlamls— .A. Smith aad Z. Commis Little tirosoenor street. Berkeley " Square. arwspaper-agents--J. Kcanlity, J. F. Muller, and P. 'V. Thies, Liverp ool , merehants-41. Burrows and J. Brown, INrasinahaus, hattem—E. and T. Williams, Nengateltreet, Wen-drapers—W. and N. Whittrnhary. Manrhester i cotton. fterchants—T:aad S. Bourne, Melkshslll.Wrnsbire, shopkcepen —.l. a iticrer and H. Raven, St. - Alhan'or spirit -merchants—E. lawasa..isod4 asul Deper, Brown's-lane. Spitalfields, car. riem—J,lll. in a ad J.. T. - Tlfarapson. Lou-tare, Manta o q uipagejsken—D, Owes aseW.Miggeoara Liverpm4 Wei liquor-Manufacturers—O. • and B. Kel t, and W. 'misty,. PriasOs-stain,Ratherhillie,man-makentS. H, mad i.Brichatt: . • w _ • it t Sk,AhtialiblAl4. owe.. , • 'to say, if the injury done to pho Plaintiff was of such magnitude as to require sign's& an atonement ? Lard 'ELLZWISOnOtIen said, he would not the gond sense of the itfry , ,by Insinuating that there could be R dollbt as to the fact of the adultery having been committed. Then as to the law it was clear. If a man was accessary to his own wrong, or privy nud consenting to it, then could he not be entitled to maintain such' n action as this. This,' however, Was not thetas° with the present P laintiff. He ha, no doubt, for severest yews, lived separately from his wife • but was he on this account to be obliged to j • let her down to every species of deo . adation—to be. j come like the common highway, for every foot to tread on—and to introduce to him as his own, a spu rious offspring? Surely he was not. What blemish was there in his conduct ? Ile had been under the necessity of separating from a had wife, but he had not renounced his controul over her, nor had he abandoned her to want. In point of law, thereforv, the Plaintiff was entitled to damages ; but in the circumstances of the case, those damages would be the smallest which could be given. As to the eouse quences likely to be produced to the Defendant, that was a subject which he ought sooner to have taken into consideration. The Jury asked, would Oue Shilling damages carry costs? Lord ELLENnonotten said, in this case it would. The . Jury found for the Plaintiff—Dameges One Shilling. Lord Parminonovon then said, the object of the Plaintiff was to obtain a divorce, which he could not • • DC. .4s . subject, ..... ___... _. gar... , the i t _ • the Ortiiily‘ro. 4 _,,,.., 7 as he already stated it to be,'and the Ledrned Conn • of brill/Tr% this. met if itirblitik ,tiee • ap*Olk set might take his bill of Exceptions. ._ .. *to Mr . Aldermen . Wood; ti he way then abZot's Mr. Liaclynnaw then shortly addressed . the Jen . , launch a naiv,Carriage, to perift tt,to be used •on lila declaring - that to his Client, a' wounded ' and invalid harness mid crsupfautinttero. ` . .ltii i 06 indneernt.nt to Lieutenant in the Navy.; who had only , his bait-ply do whyr.Philetifolleffti ' to . MakiAthe' worthy Al. to sepport him, 'a vertilipt,:thoufh only.for alshillin,g de n , p_rt Of 0 9 , IltieldePt 8 1 6 flr til 4 iik raet E datnageh as . #-tn,aat:coViliosts, would be gnat to a "Ma l A .' itit,, , tkleatlaWt t .. irs4.ihe poreoh who ,sentence of .imprisonment for life. .'.ir :this was tabs' il tiffritylaM'llii ignitit. hk:Sai iatiaTl , at t. I thetinnishment inflicted on the DAndont, bribe geed hist did Alderman Wood refer the roan'', Wtorry .a the Jury to look Into their own breaabb fill titett les t that he would be at no additional espeace, The kelofte9.4ll , . ••,/bt•7 . . ...sormkr V.Monn.. carriage having been finished, Pialuta, according le .his original agreement ? as he said hlmself, mot la Ms bill for the furidfure off he cirritge,amoelitiiirto Mal. making uo charge for the In.rtiess, to recover which the present action was hi oisght. . •. Mr. Alderman Wood having been' called, bore testimony to the conversation he had hold with ii!ri!, tiff ; and said, if he was asked his opinion n. t o what i thn real inLentious of Plairitilf were; be is a „ Oiled that he intended to have made him a present or I the whole' of the furniture, as well for his carri gii l as his.harstess. Ile had cowed *tato a contras. n. Mablvrly to build his carriage, and had paid hiir, according.to.that contract, 30f palliates. • . j From the evidence of a person in empl oyent of Ilabberly, it also appoared that Plaintiff, in con. xersat i on , t p.ifl obit it Was his intn•itioit to m. kg a present of the. whole t the worth% A Litrrean. lu this, iieW of the •ase, Mr. qtrjearrt But a'. witted, that be roma not prowed with any IruslMct of t,tkceess to his Client. I Plaintiff was, in 'consecprence, non.suited. • CONSISTORY COURT. DOCTORS' CONNONR. • WOuDiaiIDGIL AGAisST WALKER, FALSELY CALLEB w This wa.t a proceed ° in7 6lt for t ritu i llity of the marriage' l of Mr. Wm. Womlbridge, with Mis 11tire Ala i.Walker, both resident in the paris'r, of St: I..touovii Shoredi!rh„ Middlesex, upon too ;rounds, viz. the minority pf tho husband, and sokinnitation of the marriage by liceuce without legal consent.; and its having taken place in a different parish to tit in which the parties resided, under the authority of a fraudulent alteration in the liceuee, substituting in it for that purpose, the parish of St. M try, Isliugtm, for that of St., Leonard, Sl.oreditch. Th . * lit,tei cireuraidance as proved by the proiluco • of the original dpcuineuts, authorising the grant t f the 1:- cence for•the parish of St. Leonard, Shoretliteb, and of the. liyerice• itself, in which the weds " 14. Mary, Islington," were written on an erasure. Tha husband's minority, tr h ch still exits, was p rove d by his ,father, and the e .rt;ficate of his sou'- birth and • baptism; • and he likew:se proved the al,se cc of Lis consent. j Sir WILLIAM SLOTT observed, that as tit rity and non-consent were so satisfactorily es! , blisbed, the consideration of the other grow d invalidity was not necessary to be entered into. lit then recapitulated pitulated the substance of the evidence nra this poiri,t, and pronounced for the nullity of the Km. riage. • have till once he bad got a verdict at Common Law. Cm% CON. numnAs, ESQ. V. Loeb scene. The Soraceron-Gemeam. said, there could hardly t striking be conceived a more contrast between two actions of the same kind, than that which the present laction exhibited, when compared with the case which lad just been disposed of. The Plaintiff was Robert Pundas, Esq. son of a highly respectable Waiter to Ille Signet, the term by 'which the higher class of So . Baton in Scotland were denominated. The De ; fentlant was a Nobleman, the representative of an an vied( and respectable family, also of that kingdom, having a fortune of not less than 100,0001. and who, by deep intrigue, had succeeded in alienating from i the Plaintiff, the affections of a beautiful and accom -1 plished wife, whoOill seduced by the arts of the D 2, feodant, bad been esteemed a pattern for other wives in her rank in society. That the Defendant suc- 1 ceeded too well in alienating from the Plaintiff the effete it _ fleas of his wife was apparent from this circumstance,' , _ DEF.,I ES V. MITI V.S. .. • 1 that he Was actually, at this moment, living with her I ..This was a pioceeding . for :a di v orce , fear( tad but state of adultery. There * would, this day, be no by Thomas Defries, Esq. - of. Nottineamrplace, i u _ defence set np, on the part of the Defendant ; but the IM:au-le-bone, against Jane Mar .Nugent Do.fri;a, Jury, after hearing the evidence that would be laid i his irife; . apou a charge of adultery between her before them, would not fail in giving to the Plaititill i and "Pomaateletis Holden * Esq. a Comet of C. such a compensation in damages, as should shoal that vasty, .. • . • . the Plaintiff had been a kind and affectionate htis.! lit appea t re t „ hi fria r ta . a th h e d t; i l i e ri. adin D g ., s f o ri n eg th h e a pa d l i t v o ed f the . t t r i n i l t t h h e e sp introduction ring of tb e o of ea ll I i r . 4 . . baud, and that his wife bad not, till the moment the . husband, • l ir a i rtn to :se ) ; Learned Counsel had been talking of, forfeited the ;, A tl i4c ter u in a g t ree ti t u Sharacter of a kind and affectionate wife. It was . proved by Captain Smith, uncle to the 0 . , " endlted two children: About that time, epee. - Plaintiff, that he was married to his present wife, who , It plea of ill health, she visited Matlock, in Derby was his cousin, and whose name also was Dupla', 4 , shire, and it was there her aequaintrince with Mr. the church of St. Clements Dania , in tha_year 180; ! )1010en began to assume' a. more serious aspect Stne she being then 22 or 23 years of tage, , add the Plain:. I shortly afterwards eloped %%it It.him, and they past. d tiff about ten years older. The same Mitten, and ;a considerable timein travelling through various parts Mr. Thomas 'lrving, Navy-testy-Office, and a Miss 1 of the country, under the assumed characters othui- Colnehoun, also proved that the Plaintiff and his band and wife; and upon their arrival in town for the • ;wife Lived together in the highest ap p arent happiness: a% inter, to ok . lodgings, and continued to live torihn he being a most kind and affectionate husinted, and under that assumption of character, to the precrut she an equally kind and affectionate wife, there : time. ;air. Defries brought an action for damages seeming to be the most perfect love and Cent.; aga inst Mr. Holden, Who suffered judgment tog. lty deuce between them.—Mr. Irving stated; that the default, and a verdict was returned for 10001. Plaintiff possessed property in Sweden, of which : On the part of Mrs. Defries, a pleading. was g;ren in defence country he was a Nobleman ; that his w ife and he ;I, from her as having•deceived her i n. asserting 'the estrangement 'of her hus. had been in the use of visi tin g that countr y ever y , mnd's affections year, for the sitke of lookinfafter their affairs there; ,to an improper line of conduct, which hxl• tie the that, for the toast two years, the'Plaintiff bad gone i unfortunate result ; and charging him whit collusion,' by himself, leiving hie wife behind him, on-accoent . in offering to abandon his action against Mr. Holden, of the hostilities between the two cauntries.' That ', if he would make a settlement on her. In reply to t the Plaintiff went to Sweden •as usual, is June test this, Mr. Defries pleaded, Ix the most part, a gene t $ $ 1 leaving his wife at Wickham, under the . protection , cal denial, accounting, hewever, for hii agreeing to 'of her sister; Lady Douglas, wife of S ir Howard ,abanclon the action, by stating th e impassionid en -1 Douglas. After remaining some time with Lady treatie s of his wife upon the subject, to have so Douglas, Mrs. pandas was to go on a visit to an old powerfully influenced his feelings, as to have in ! acquaintance, a Mrs. Roberta, the wife of a Cler- duced him to promise a compliance with her request, Igyntan ; but on the Plaititiff returning to his country till the sushewbseqoent the counsel ro of hispriety profe suc ss ioean ial en: d . unexpectedly, in September, on his goi n g to Mor- visers ed of h claunt's Hotel, in Dean-street, Soho, where he had stance of indulgenah ead hte.ss. ; formerly put up, be found his wife there, %%here, The adultery at different places visited by the appeared; that the Defeudaut also had taken a parties in their tour, having been p roved, by read. H , the evidence of the servants that accompaniod. porn. No proof was offered on any familiarity having I S them, the m friendsf rof th ecapitulated the principal p oints, e.husband, and others, taken place at this Hotel, but ir. W. SCOT Mes. Sarah Walker, 14,Cumberland.street,observing, that the whole of the defensive evidence road, proved that the Defendant and the Plaintiff's : must be taken as read, that the wife sn'ght not 1.4 j wife, site originally passed themselves, with her,. as : deprived of atty benefit which, as an sc,ntsed pitrty, husband and wife, had lived in her house, and had she might expect to rosult from it. Ito thm, cont,tantly slept together, from the 21st of September , after'n few observations, confirmatory of his m inion last (being the very day of the Plaintiff's arrival at ; of the sufficiency of the proof, pronounced for the . Mordaunt's lietel) to the resent moment. : Divorce. . . Lord Betexeon.otten, after pointing out to the Jury the unblemished nature of the Plaintiff's con- ! .A. fire -broke out on Sunday nipt, at nine o'clock, duct, and the provident attention he tied paid to the' in the premises belonging to Mn.e Badeock, bo . ' protection of his wife, iaaeaving her With her sister , seller, •in gnien't- head -passage, Nenate.storto „Lady Douglas,—left it to„tbern to love such:cetp - - which, after destroying a quantity of hooks, a' pensation•for the injury the Plaintilf had sustain- • j a ...r , i ,cd, as, in the circumstances 'OC -the Case,. he seiped .. .6: few night; since, a man of the name ot 0. to merit. •. . J.• :. got oat by t en o ' clock without further d:tmage. ._.. Mac, Niel wa d s beat and bruised in the *tree , 1 The Jury, after a few minutes, Onsviltaliani'frad : d G e r u e d e:l o , t: , 4 1 rehywaerdenieoflror wiiii:kizno,ma.ro:tlii ii!orsii, for the Plaintiff—Damages, -10061: • • t every of the perpetrator. .••4 e e 5 COUR IC • E CONtMON Pa:4s Pustoitsts., bee. IL . On Thursday last, Thomas 'Addison, rf . Per7t , • • - ,asato V. masakaily. ! nearaVigton, killed a brace of woodcocks at at , This Vat t eiinaictiota to recorelesfealjoi. goodi sold i shot. This is his second achieveuteut of .the Lip , and'tleliveretl:' f and we never before heard of any peeson ejtontitta i . Mr. Serie:int BEST 'toed, that 'Plnintlff„was the brace, as these birds always fly in • differm . It . . 41 i . inventor of a new•deicriptten of meter, /known by I: rections. • the name of Anreen ate which iiiil'all I he' appear- I ar t;'l . gold, and whi,... 4 .' *as' nAufekieetre durable than -vv . dc;siiiPtitiVirillliti4r.' 044 decimal • ~ e li. ''''- 'OM lOW . lib a; lied -• 5C011;11 .11(.1C45. tiVRAVI 'IX Wltsze. Arrived. nU s ed t 013 rte* ) lek l e DeTer Der . .F, A M. Deitspaia lir•inn), Derwick I 6 .11, A. 31. • • • HIGH - WATER. AT LONDON' BRIDGIi ON I)4Y. Allernlng. IS minutes a ft erAl livening, minutes after t. • .dgih• riA°91114.141:11:1169:' at7:1619;1...:111.41.144‘1111-1!". ;Iffal:#4. LONI STlTpillAlf 87 pet4reet• • 4..0.- --"*"-- , • • _ _ ~ t••• ~_ .....nra~.,,,~ ~~~ y,~ . i . V' . 11 1 1 J ft. i ~ S