The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-03-18 00:00:00

~I ,~! - - 1 dal was blown ; not s single whisper of impropriety was heard ; cot - the slightest insinuation of calumny VAS made against the Princess of-Weirs. Theeepat. rat;on took place. after the lapse of ifteen months, auxins which period he begged the House to observe the character her Rossi Highness was sot stripped pf any por•inn of its origins' purity, sox divested of any entre of the honour sod Lustre which ,had first istszll her to the exalted shadiest she was deemed worthy to fill in this country. There were conse quently circumstances of aggravation peculiarly affecting in her case; for the lissuse could sot but recollect, that at the time of the separation, yctung and `distinguishea Priecesk a fortigl!Os state, afflicting. even to o.private 't destitute . of till:time col [Com, and were communicate& if blood and friendship ;-'•;. ippiogs of royalty, she had nes t sphere and circle in white those , comforts which in pri., Imilarly;plpesdp could justly to owir Vat, ilostitute as ,protectwo, to which she ,con in uncloebted right ;—deprtied friendly advisers and vsenkort, the kw of bittersou. and I .., . •,‘ nick opinion to that of men, by their educe ' tun, their long practice, and their habits of life, very much his topsider; ; yet In justice to' the ac cused, be would venture to state EOM circum stances, which would be foetid to possess weight is their influence upon the public After the decision made by the four sioners appointed by the ging to Make necessary enquiry, •a•sA.... report them,--after most unequivocal vindication of the innocence of Princess of Wales, as communicated in their .Re port,—it appeared, that a fresh examination Toot place into the evidence which had been earepletaly disregarded and discredited • because it was contra ' slicted and dbibelieved e . The new enquiry aos forgrditt a Noble . 'reties, who seemed -dodgems to • give force to that width had been previously deemed of no validity ; and When the witness said, 66 I never believed the report, Itesated it as the infamous lie . of the tidy,' what was the conduct of that Noble , • Poison ? That person stilt seemed, by a most sign!. conduct of his wife t satisfy lohlat manner, to give credit to the report ; he any Court, 'that his wife ought to be p unished for • • eiblek his bead, and appeared to disbelieve the strong her subseq uent c rimes I But .if the Princess of "e• twadmony of the witness whom he had called before Wales were guilty of the crime imputed t 9 her by bac When loch a circumstance, 'coupled 'with Lady Douglas, it was undeniable, Abet by the laws ^-14 - Ivetibor means and prtmeedinp, which he should !lust of England the blood of the Princess, of Wales .silica revive, was ditty considered, he wield ask, did - must have expiated that offence, Yet it appeared, -i; it not become the noose, as the representatives of that after the examination and the sentence of ac people. and as the losers of the Crown, to bring quittal which established , the innocence • of the 'iris=Use to A Was? It was not the Princess of „Princess of Wales, Lady ;:Doughts was deemed a • Wales alone that was shocked by such proceedings. competent witness, —competent after her testimony Was DOC& Mama Wales, her natural protector, had been rojected as entihrthy of credit, Lady shocked? was not the Monarchy, with which they Douglas had been cdtssidered, not only by. a and their Royal Lain were se intimately connected, Magistrate, M... Coriant,—but she had been treat ` • stocked ?—were not the best interests of the country ed as such by Lard Eldon, the Chancellor of Eng * :'alliatited*? were not the meralify,, the virtues, told the ; land: [Cries t t f liner. han!'s Agar I] Lady Dough" Aprilty, of the,,people, obailita had said, that the Princess ass pregnant. and was. •-Tes, they Were all, both iudividually andcollectivety,: delivered of a male child: if to, the Princess of shocked and 'affected in the deepest and tend•-rest , Walep was in imminent danger ;—if so, the Princess „points. It wig, he would maintain the assertion Charlotte was involved in danger ;—hotwhet *As still ever and over *gain, totally impossible that theme- more striking, Lady Douglas herself prrvi, test, and ter could rest in its present state • it was impossible, offered at n that moment to maintain, a: every risk, whether the righti and interests of the Crown, of of! the tenth of her deposition. Was it not mast the suhject, wire considered, that the crisis should j traordiaary, that Leilly Douglas, should have be &ferret , any longer. If the sentence of acquittal !so long concealed the stibject, matter of her which had been pronounced, were to be set up as a testimony, and have concealed it with such care, ' bar against that crisis which appeared so absolutely as to- have kept it from the knowledge of her own neCessary, could it be denied that there were people i husband ? When Sir John Douglas was in passession who, in opposition to that assertion of . the dune- of it, he made it known to his Royal Highness the cence of the Princess or Wales, were at all times ! Prince of Wales, who certainly, with great pro ready to shake their heads, and who could not help priety, made a communication of it to his Majesty's thinking that there was Something it? It was high confidential advisers. The four Commissioners ap-, time that a thorough scrutiny should be instituted.— pointedto take the subject into their consideration, It was high time that every circumstance, hint. and were iti every respect fitted to the importance of the suggestion, should be sifted in every way which hu- ! enquiry. lie readily admitted, that they consti. man ingenuity could' devise, for the purpose of doing toted a tribunal, than which none could he more ho ;justice, not to the Princess of Wales only, but to • nourable,—more qualified by their legal knowledge, all •v ho were implicated in the whole transaction.— and by their acknowledged talents and integrity. The fact was, and he Stroke in the hearing, and un- They proceeded to examine, and 'terminated t. , ,y ad der the correction, of many whip were well acquaint- quitting :—yet the very evidence of Bidgood, Lloyd, ed with that fact, that 'the rumours still prevalent, . and the other witnesses, against enrich they con. though in direct opposition to the sentence of ac- correct in forming their decision,, was given to the quittal, were numerous; and what was worse, they I world for the obvious purpose or vilityttig and tra were circulated with an appearance of candour which diming the Princess of Wales ! He held in his hand gave them a weight that sat better felt than it could be [Here Mr. W. prodsc4 a boa k]—a pamphlet *hich described. This was the mode io which mischief much was expressly stated to be published by authority, end_ more injurious, diffusing, and lasting, would he car- which professed, by the titio,to centaiu an account of vied into effect, than by attacks, however biotite, the Intestigation and Proceedings that had takett open, and direct. The conseqattece was obvious, place with respect . to the Plite-ret of IVales. li e •h a d mere and could net be avoided. Th.cautiously the himself bought the pamphlet, sad he nod thought injury was veiled sad abided, the deeper k took proper matt, by what auth.,rity was published it ? r00t... The result was clear and certain ; and while The answer vseti was, that it was riblished by Royal the affair rested asit was, was not award% that the Authority • and when he farther asked, now tuatau- PriacPss of Wales should suffer—should be de. therity h ad been communicated, he was assured that • graded—shltdd be sunk and lowered in the esti- it should ae known when :he pri.p*r time -rrived f or enetion of.men, even of the greatest respectability, declaring It. The wordi, '1" by Authority " termed integrity, and honour ? Whea he cast his eyes the rouuing fitle . of the paalpi,!et, and were allishl on . backward—when he took a clear and minute review the entside of the house, mitt , the e‘i4essi of the origin, progress, termination, and revival of of attracting purchasers, and externitle, th , !ctrcelstimi. the accusation—he was bound to declare to the of evidence ruinous to the chat-sett.r and ho.loui, and. House, that he had feit it his duty to arrest the far. dangerous to the ..xistence of the •rests sl of Wale s ,. I thee progress; as far as he could, of what be con- The deposition of tidy Dou k i4s anti ;• Jt•lio Doug ' celled was most; intimately connected with the best las was accampaoled a note of Cue publisher, which 'interests of the monarchy and the people. He had, stated, that the real stare Gi the cas.. was given in their •in truth, much 'to say upon the subject; but he testimonies : so that the Princess s,f Wales was brought • would endoavour rather to confine himself to state- beforea new tribunal, upon the very evidence which meats warranted by facts, than to indulge in the had been discredited by the four Commissioners. Out 4ixprrstion of those feelings and emotions which the of four witnessesexamined,notonewasdeemed worthy severe and unmerited treatment of the Princess of of credit; and the evidence of Frances Lloyd, in par- 1 Vales might call forth and justify. What was the ticelar, was decidedly contradicted by Dr. Mills, as peculiar situation of the Princess of Wales? What well as by Mr. Edmeades. He could not here help was the plain and simple narrative of her connection expressing his surprise, that after the experience the with this country.? 'ln 1795, the Princess of Bruns. four Commissioners had of Frances Lloyd, with •re- wick was married to the Prince of Wales. She was spect to the crime charged against the Princess, received-with all the honours and attentions doe to they should afterwards, in another respect, have bet rank, to her intimate alliance with the Crown, grounded their report on that evidence. In. no-' and to the high destiny she was in all probability (icing the testimony of Mrs. Lisle, he was anxious called upon to fill. In 1796, she produced that 'to abstain from all remark and comment which might Princess, who was at the present moment the • tend to give any personal pain : she was, he believed, hope of England. After all the attentions so very a lady of respectability, and from her rank and con justly courerted upon her,--aftei addresses of ngctions in life, her evidence ought to be received congratulation had passed, and the, customary ma- with great attention ; but he would put it to the nifestations of loyal feeling 'were evinced,— House, whether it was not a circumstance of peculiar a separation from the Prince of Wales took place.— I weight, in favour of the Princess of Wales that Mrs. It rs,lo. for him , to allttwd., lathe_ mom remote Lisle, who anointed with her from her attire! in this, manner, to the causes of that - unfortunate topers.. country to the year 1812, had riot found any ground Von. It was quite sufficient for him - to remark, that h for imputing to her Royal Highness the crime of when the separation occurred, not a breath of sewn- I which she was accused? Was not 'the evidence of Mrs. Lisle, on the contrary, ,taken, in. the strictest sense, against the Princess of Wales, a decisive proof. of her Royal Highaess's correctness of conduct 3—. Ile must trouble the House rot a few minutes with some passages in Mrs. Lisle's evidence, relative to the Princess and Capt. Maltby. Mrs.'L. could not say there las any attachment; and she never saw any kissing bands, &c. lie wished to confine himself to materiel , points, After the evidence was given, tim depositions were taken ; and he was not surprised, under ail the circumstances, at Mrs. Lisle's pignatutre rto the deposition ; but be was, he must confess, sue. prised to find leading . qUestions put to her by MS Learned Friend, the Lord Chancellor Erskine ; AuestiOni on which that Noble and Learned Lord, when an Advocate, would lace expired, sootier, than 'have permitted •to be answered by any witness of his; •on -a trial in Court of Law. Oae.would be tempted by the deposition, to think that Mrs. . L. said ali in one breath as it were. tinskuestion in „f • ;,, 11. .0. examination. took the sting eniTrAy out of the depa. , Lloyd wit proved by Mills and FATTieads'is evidence to be petjured.' Mrs. 'Usle's deposition woo den, away, as to the serious part: of it. As for Cole and I3idgood, how could he condemn the Princess on their evidence, seeing that the Cabinet did not condemn her or what Bidgood . swore ? --if , the second Cabinet thought Itieeiedible, how was it possible that they could bare entirely acquitted her ? lie should like to ltear'theie men examined before a. proper tribunal,—by the Learned Gentleman op. posite (Garrow) above oil men living. Ile had dwelt sufficiently on these circumstances ; but he had a word the year 1802, or two to say on the con dition of the Princess, from up to the present 'time. She had suffered under eleveti years' persecution :. if that were denied, those who could hate proved her guilt, .had acted criminally towards the country by their silence. Thus she remained till this day, as de scribed- in the production of Mr. Verceval c—Left the gemination was pot to_ Mrs. L. 'al: Did .Capt.' without protection "against false charges of 'friends Menby sit nut to the Princess 14,tiiiiner'?" • Yet, in turned enemies,—of servants, who seemed traitors the deposition, it see m ed is U she stated it velun..: and spies,-4 -and from the foul conspiracy of social tariff. Thin Lord Ebkinalniks Mrs. L." whether' and.domestio treason, she could 100 to no security they ail sat just as;the four Noble Lords sat round for her honour, but to the principle of justice which , their table with her Mr. W. maarked ' constantly actuated the conduct of his Majesty."— *as Othilf *Wow pot to Mrs. L. ) . said avian! Loss at her disadvantageous 1011140 a. See ; cam- :.. ll ee i he p a i tesol tu n il a lc inti u ojet i m a dr a ry n i rs a d .un , npoyy se s i ti oac t ithha i t ti r et i cerse r .,r taken soddenly n guarding her. adopted. S. , e save that courage ern' oently show n , ' n ' ' Uhor, hear' , 0 4 i (ea s ,„ rb tlte iinecrisr ia: srhaa l ic a *. i a tli t i tseitl' it iectil i ii: 4l:l l : . Pl a ied d :usec i d . mien as an °hint rt peon augnrtg•i„ohi:finswdzshilian:djetehsietypNreigege whether the .espec can ting i efirg _ c ought? Mrs. L's answer ,veasoot like the statement Lord called the in the . de p ositio n .' Lard • Ellenhotough; Indeed, • her . desire for her daughter's confirmatinn N,s.ds.(4let.. sal& to the Chancellor . I Suppose you'd put it was told-her in answer Princess as any married woman." " What' id 'you eter Claratiou on that sebject, ii.ititing, which was sin ' ail& of the Priniess's talking with Capt. Maltby ?" brought forward. • • was another question; bet these were never auewered, beak in MOO as her residenCe: S q l . ie uit w te a d' a then s e. lam..gjh .we b o 4 Dool erelag about them• in the de. parated from het daughter, but did..not make com. position. , Ho seas sorry to be obliged to animadve r t ' plaints, as her usual intercourse with her subsisted up upon the conduct of the four Noble Lords Commis. toe certain period of education,' when her visits were 'Sinners ; bathe should be doing injustice' to the : not restrained, except conformably to certain rules cause of justice, if - he did not say, that, if the ac. : necessary for her education. From 1802, and during costal hall been pro!ided with an advocate s witnesses I the investigation d own t o 1 8 10 , no restraints were ° would have been protected, or prevented from an.; laid on, and none, therefore,TomeitainA of. At the swering many lotertogetylies that were put tarthem, i last period , certain hieta wet* given which w ere " The Prince*" . says i.Mr% L, “ is free and ion:" oheyed..Somewhat abruptly,last aqtainn; the Pri ncess descending."—" That,":ol4 the Chancellor, "is not ?inks informed of farther .restraints. Ile (Mr. W.) my question."-:--" I.thought,"- says Mrs. L., "that : wished to God thatlord Eldon had the same litter. the Princess liked to talk with Captain Mashy, ra. t course with her that he onoe luid; but now, instead ther than with the lAdies." Let'the House recol- of an adviser, he had become the 'teen Messenge r o f lect, that there were, and are attached to the Prin- mandates, and the returner of her letters. She had cess, persons Of high tonaideration ; yet could any once- her_ 4 r_e_g_adriaers s ,..bot -now _there. was a d eep ' . ltody doubt that when new society, Which afforded gulf hetweetilier and . Lettliiidea, • which was me. new topics of conversation,' broke in upon the same. rally iMpassable s [hear]. She Could no longer aval ness—the fatigue of retired and mock royalty..-de. herself of his Los ship's advice, and counsel. The barred froes•many sources of amosement.yet en.. recent teStrictions haecaused her comptaints.of he compensated by even the trappings of her state--eould ins deprived of the onkupleasure aed_solace. left to a any body doubt, or be • surprised, that the Princ.earlintherittheraifuaTion. - Her letter was returned to should find something in it agreeable? Yet thit her three times, with the.cold, -rigid, austere reply, was an imputation -upon her I 'Let Gentlemen bring, that there Were " no commands." He cod I not to thesr consideration the situation of their own , now lament the publicity given to this business ; fi r wives, sisters, and daughters. When they left home if the crisis had been delayed much longer, it would to attend to their poblic oirprivate bushiest, would hate been productive of much greater danger. they not treat with contempt and score, evi. He had rather been the adviser of the letter objected deuce such es Vtis, if It was attempted to charge 'l6, Than that such consequences should• bate fol. criminality upon it? (Hear, hear.) They might be levee& thetrgh hemight haveebjected to the threateo. disposed to prosecotethe calumniator . : but her Royal ingletteeto the King, advised by Mr, Perccval ; add Highness slid not stand in the situation of a person he certainly should hate shrunk from the otEnisive for whom such steps could be taken. He was ashamed" Pablicailan. The Neblel o ord had said, that when of some partsa-of the examination.. It was asked, I the separation took plac., it was known that no whether she went out with Mr.-Ifirivitiii a whiskey 2 'letter from her Rityal. -Highness would be received Whether he drove ft ? This warsotnething like the I The Prince. of Wales, believer,' a'' that time, bad , mode of cross-examination, " Who was- there be: Ino responsible advisers, which 'be• had since he be. sides Mr. Hood's • servant?" " Was he a man or a i came the head of the Government. He was, at the boy ?" [A langh.] " How often did she go out so!" . former period, a prit4.‘e Gentleman, under the au. . Was it fair.play to the Princess to extract answers in' thority of the King, at Guardian of . the Royal Fae that manner? Then they came to Mr. Chester, who s mily : if any improprint, occurred therein,' the King wa... stated to be "a pretty yonngslan."-.4.410ugh.] . could interfere by his right, and without any farther —This was - too ludicrous to be' serious, and yet too I reso, t. Now, that the, Prise , • had become the Ruler, serioos to be ludicrous. The inference seem* twbe v i he Wee wernrived toliene it stidOtrar ant feitheritrl that there was a prepossession for him, because he vate arrangement could stand in the wity ' ed. was handsome. It was asked, " Is he not bind. tion to the Throne, and prevent its being consi e some?" The answer was, 64 pretty !" All that was ; The objections were not, that there 'was any thing nauseous had been read ; but he should notice one .in her letter, or in its pra ) er, which was improper, point : the witness was asked, " Do you recollect : or that could not be accorded ; but it was the pub the Princess getting up and going out of her room; lication of it that was made the ground of offence. into another at night, for a light?" Answer, " I do." i What, then,- was the consequence ? A fresh eta " Why„:' say two lawyers, 6 6 did she get up in the : minatiou! On the 12th of Feb. the letter was pub. night i"—[ Lassgh.]—Yet this was in the deposition; i lished: on the 13th, Mr. Conant sends to Lady Dou. and the shakers of heads continued to shake, because ; glas. Was the publication of the letter so criminal, . Mrs. Lisle had deposed so and so. That was not a fair ° as to set on foot a process which . might end in be. construction of Mrs. L's evidence, if the examinations I beading ,•her i' She stated afterwards, that she was . were read. 6 ' I heard 'her Royal Highness say," I no partyletheptiblication: it seemed evident that her says the witness, " that she had been ill, and that Ilast letter Wes net without advice. • Did the Right her eandle.was gone out." Was not the Princess to I non. Gent. (the Speaker) know, that at that time be in a situation common to every subject of the ! Lady Douglas was again .under examination ? lie realm ? Tjte public mind must form her shield, and ; believed the Noble Lord. spoke the truth, when he • her protection. Read the evidence, and say whethei I said, he knew nothing of it: liOw could he remain , she has not a right to be treated as innocent, till she I a responsible Minister, as Secretary Of State, whew be proved guilty. Mrs. L.'s testimony giresoin easy, Ihe found out this matter, which had been cone aled ! natural, and probable solution, of this Mysterious from him ? He was the dupe, and not the Minister ! transaction,—[fieadj--Mr. Chester, it seems, , Bet now the Privy . ConnCll advise the continuance (walked out twiee• with the Princess; and he was of restraints, undera view of alt the circumstance , . left at Lord Sheffield's. Thee for Captain Moore. •What the Noble Lord had said, allowing the crecl't He dined there, and *here, it was asked,alid he go of his own memory of his own words,' confirmed his afterwards ? Why, down stairs : she sent him for a i (Mr. W.'s) inference : it was, that, if there bad been book. " How long was he in other it ?" :Twenty.; criminality, no intercourse would have ,been per. minutes. Then it was asked how long he 'stayed ! matted. If; said l i e, she had not been so impatient, the second time. This part 'of the examintitiote.was . ' the:reatricliees were only. le have lasted - till theyoung as mach like an imputation on Mrs. Lisle, as aporr Princeis returned to' town: Why, then, .could not the-Princess. Well theno the Princess actually made I the prili*s of %des have been told so, and that Captain Moore, a present of a inter injtstand! Mr*. I the restriction to visiting once a fcrtnight was limit b. saw him afterwards, on 'the Princess Charlotte's ' ed. Ito her daughter's residence . at Windmr?— birth-daywhpu hewsjationylagorothe rest of throllree- for the Mere. publication of a letter, ell the company. He (WM.) night nottgo to Mi. Law rence, .! prevent herivy punishment was to .be i n dieted, — and soon to the end oldie chapter in the same manner. I The-Nohle Lord had talked' of party feelings and He had, he Conceived, done enough in referring to : Viet s, and of the danger of widening family di this 6.0 k ; and he dearly taw that the notes of the sensions. ' As far as he (Mr. Whitbread} was con. vs 606(.4 ; and that was but little in this business— es far, he twlieved, as those, had gone who had ad. wised her Royal Highness, they had advised no step to be taken by her, but with the sincerest desire to put her into that situation in which she ought to be placed : they had Advised a dignified suhrnissiou,—to Which she agreerl,—to, those things which were irre mediabie. lie was not ashanwil to avow what he had suggested. He confessed, that he did feel ex. tremely delighted at the r. suit of the discussion the 'other night. Ire met a person of rank, to whoa he stated, that he should recomniend a dignified act of sabmiiSirt by the Princess of ' Wales, which be thought might put an end to all this trumpery. Ile also thought that a proper letter to the Prince Re gent miglirebtain a corresponding answer. Could he be said to be going beyond his duty, if he stated to the House, the terms, in which he suggested that, such a letter should be dawn IT, after her repot and unanimous acquittal*. Mr. W. then read thelettcr he had suggested, Which in suhstatica stated, that her Royal Highness once Tore presumed to approach his Royal Highness the Prince Regent; after the recent deciarations of her innocence in the House of Com. mws, mince the interdiction of her intercourie w id) her daughter : that ahe had received the Report of the Privy Council from Lord Viscount Sidusootb ) and wi placed . in a state, person : she was left d • farts *Lich flowed fror by the endearments of stripped of ail the trapp within ,the limited PO she mewed, any of the Tate life , a *woman simi claim, and was entitled I &ha was of, die natural sewed she possessed an ' mo n s was of those Priem , to whets slui might 1* t • • . _ .. .. . .No •-•, TESMA N. • , . . ---- - - • - -- - • .. ? . . , ---..--- • • . • 4 lit - V- ' -- 1` - , •••• o e iot t e e ''' r eda- , as a b i e mo o ns , t o lgtvgit.. .• • - t . I Stittet to many tesatell Sifeedthee Weed whist. her, for the eteednation of We :and the alleviation - diet • , - . •': ' l ' a&-.4 " 1. .. f'l ..' ' • he" beets Pet to her. s" What T ....0 11414 'ef her "edict le the militant pa t* a. • . • ' 414 .... i - '• iit' :- !gees end eeptehi Mantle itt start ,. whit, if Pak, Went, sod hovel% of the rIC D . the ac.. ; eat* , assistance lii setae . • 4., . .. _ •, _ con; cream. ' was to relieve her ha the ____ ' PIN ' vtitsi-• tag ttrihnetde yes suppose they t i alliet Pe..takeu..by surprise. See her se rvants ti d been • 2 Ws end • Ellenhorouglblerllll/114hes. ?rem her r end carried sway to give test golbel to the her. See - her witboet any defender, pH /ra t ~what was her etas:et? - Whit pert of tt lie ; .oet r iett Of eatuoto *Rd T oiresoek, f - the peried On . '' : -n. the IFltion A lb •tb Com , . , mike ': 4-tier :a rIVIAI.?""1111* - illa r bel" ass 44l . pre . I'll' ' lleri 4 7. 11S tir li dri t i dtl eirlig° d•li e. 66 1:1 441il tffil lial*"-a k elrilire"r• .ii .. . theti : 6r be sellr er s il leed t ft h s ri tings o a th 9; in ili g ed4r t s o len ippo biPnch' rt snli h bii ;r ibt fs a be° v r e l after the' 1114intetteine, t „,,_• Wt. lid ' bPou Then teed &Woe 41 'es a ' her poseession of which the had so emi , aleir ee ofts attempted. '' l! , . . 5ibi........0 4 . to . itiet . , mid ark - tie - id -of and . which, he believed, to bo t g oon , lon "tires fitaily felted, In -- - iiitegi *pie W WIRA bkinnit we t 1!( the Princess's voided was pre. couscinasnesa - of her own inntAlf.; ' i vu .,,, pkil ). w h ia 4 .„„4, 1 *sle e t: , foe a nett etelien—he.pute it to Ito . lirela i i4 te , i b t ri m i tetion .ij weptetely . enough . i contra -, f o p on t cot by liming tbs.case ; # !i effiltn :41. 4 Iltsgaesek.Stotlyetieve-veeeri: . , on ltbiedlisitissiou. He was told i shat !tea RI & le peivute - Hfr-; : wheheist i .. 1 1 7.m tr4 4—* ' ' / 7.eliasbuis a si l t -. t 40.0 Searle* which 6 4 seld at Pherdi Auleteerst knew that esainhatietta were st ress to w mobeitirhassetisalty itY,l3,4oir .4 . • 11 ",'. . 0 0t° . L _ . P.lsibtato• . steee 4 4-7 hi .. . l 'lm libarte.- 1 teS,ertelet her lest isetumn.: The Nob .. r ...... 1 . tbe p r i n ee e p t bat a ria le•Cler,, if ~n •', .) mOie „ ;h ue tinsels's', wee•eql M r &O&M; liflifdlosiate„ % tiereegfllsidttaki let the cOrisequene r i r 41 7 0 7 4; om i' c i c ; t ide t if sai ento r l t er ;_ 4o ) l ‘ Atop • sin of fi nd ebethetly, ler she vestion referfed'tii• bee own, of the publivher. sat Said he. The I'd I tow lie her' mistenduct ,aftersverdi. . What (eland could 'family : "" my daughier,” she ,s ,!says, "lived welt •retipondeJ with the Quee n , to w h om ill -, it Noble n ib a p erson h at e to rottpiela of the,subseqweet • path . her. , husbietio!' . To the question again, .ways L teOniniginde4 she young 1 3. rio . eein fat signi. conduct of his wife? What could he urge to satisfy whether the. print,seot lited as 'g + married wnman of her care, respecting the matter, of w