The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-02-26 00:00:00

n:tsoica►ing with his family and friends, tics of preventing any communication ml Members of Parliament was intolerable. Itmi be anowered, perhaps. that an application have been made to the magistrates, who • every satisfaction on the subject, and would grievance which might really exist. Bet truce themselves were not, peobably, abuses which existedt and even though they '. I .9OLIMAtra willing to corsass...—_ atop hot awthorlsed and sanctioned them. whereat& (I latiestei% it appeared by the Rep Comsdadossets, who - were appointed by the tit inquiry Into the existing abuses, tins h id in some casts been applied,--(Hear, het what he bad bees able to discover, he was ioclin'ed I eve thot tits odious and oppressive practice complained-arose oat of a - desire which the lascasterbed to oppose She progress of Airlift— RAM. Tbe magistrates were hostile to Reform, and veto therefore amities en know if any thing had been ;44 on that subject laths prisoner's cerrespondeoce.— With-that view they hod given orders to the gaoler to luau oyes aU lettevsaidressed to the prisoner, or sent from him. The swigistrates having at first some doubts of their authority. submitted a case for the opinion of comsat. The opintos was given in favour of them, and the pottier Was declared lawful. They did net, however, flidarthat t site suMeient. They then deterailood ow is stedweiat wee rules and regulations into dos govertm omit of, this prises. be would maintain that the praetiems was sot *sly' lama *f privilege. but was also a v ia = lotion of thew laws. The Hon. Member then adverted thaboideasts, dm 9th of Anne, and read one or two cheeses. owe of which prohibited any person knowl•gly aid willingly to ream, to epee letters, Lc. eseept by mimeo warrast io sailboat of one of his Majesty's Be. =Ns Waste. After commenting on the enacting ethos statute, the Hon. Member begged leave to naiad the bow of a document which was entirely fa awliseasity with hie own opinion, and which was a doe dgsdott of the law. Ho mllsded to the letter of Lord SitiMmtb. the late &snowy of State, written on thelfth o ,flonsrber,lBl4, tollitheeper of the gaol of Gloom's. UNA drealorcopy of that - letter was sent to every comity . goalie The Hos. Hest. then read the letter. and the illegal practice of opening 10tt0.% adelossili 'sae primmer, or. seat by them. Tim !Ifs. gistratiapretended.tothe power of making mkt sad regidadoms for thirprisos, Nader the ' authority d the 384 sf Yearge slim &weed, chapter the 29th. Bet be appre that that Act did not coffer on the 3.1.041691•11 esisf east`-authority. The Hon. Member the lead ems slaws* tits Act, which related to cam. raasieedwas With per debtors. &c. He contended it in cluded all primula. Wows as well as debtors. The spi rit ofthe Act throundonst was humane is the extreme. It showed that the olinet in the contemplation of Par hawse tams M allittridist and net to exasperate the suf ferings of the esfeetadate primmer'. But it might be collated.. that tholtsfridise oforsing letters bad been sanctiosed by the askew( Shwpalwa. He *veld show that the letters wen Iwokessapeo before those rules ea which so much Meese would be kid were drawn up. lie Would not messy bush expressiows, when he should say, that rules so oppressive had mot been put into prac tice in any Other gifol in the leinwdom. Such oppressive regulations bad not-bees adopted by the Soutersembi re blitgistrites elan towards Mr. Hunt, who, whatever the Attorooptleattral might say'of him, bad by his conduct too l by-the isnairy, of whichle was the chief author, rendered the most permanent service to the cause of ha. ;sanity. Ho demisted whether, under the 3i'd of George 11. sirs Magistrate. could enact any mash rules as they pretended. For that opinion he had an authdrity which in that house was entitled to the greatest possible re storer. He meant that of the late Sir Samuel Romilly, who gave an opinion on the subject, when in 1812 he permuted a Petition to that house, from a person con fined in Lancaster Gaol. He, on that occasion, stated that the County Gaol bad belmiged to the High Sheriff of the county, and that toe Magistrates bad no tight to interfere with him in the management of it. They should not presouseto meddle with the prisoners, the rare of whom belonged of right to the county Sheriff. and fat ethos. comfort and safe custody he was bound to provide. That was the opinion of Sir Samuel Hominy, and by that opinion he (Hr. James) felt that be was warranted in saying, that the opening and istercepasx of thom letters were contrary to late. Batif,after all, it should be the opinion that the 39d Ono. M. gam to the iilagistrates the power of establishing those_ objection able and odious regnlations, the sooner such an Act was repealed the better. Hating said said so much on the illegality of the practice, he would trouble the home with a few observations on it, as a breach of the privi lere of Parliameat. So ter as be was personally coot .erne,) in the question, his intention was, if he had mmght fur protection at all, it iliould be in a Court of Le n•, *bore he had no doubt of obtaining a verdict be fore an %martial Judge and Jury. That would be the mode which lie would adopt fur his own satisfaction; lwt when he hid been informed that the cause , of com p'•iint was a breach of Parliamentary privilege. Le at v.:ye determined to bring it under the consideration of V.:it house, the Members whereof it so much affected. In bringing forward that question, lie felt that be was doing his duty a. a Member of that Louse, and in defending their privileges, be was doing more than that—Le was endeavonring to alleviate the sufferings of the poor un loopy prisoners.—(Hear, hear.)—He concletle,t, by tatmmg a resolution to the effect, that it be the opinion of that honer, that any person proved to have broken open any letters addressed to or from Members of that house, he guilty of a breach of Parliamentary privilege. The motion being seconded, and then put by the Speaker—Mr. It. PEEL. and Lord STANLEY rose at the spine time, and the former baying. given way, Lord STANLEY did not see on what ground the motion ofthe lion. Gentleman, for declaring the open ing of a letter from a Prisoner to a Member of Parlia trisnt a breach of their privileges, could be sustained. oitnilar question Ind been started last year, and re- Prred to a Committee of Privileges, and he hail never beard that they felt it incumbent upon them to bring the enhject forward. That the practice complained of, would, under some circumstances, amount to a breach of moral justice between man and man, no one conld deny; but there were limits to the privileges eine to letters, and when lie found that the opinions of lientleruen of the profession of the law, of Magis trates., and even of the Judges of the land, were stronglyin favour of the practice complained of in a ease like that most particularly referred to, lie could not think that there were sufficient grounds for assent leg that a breach of privilege had been committed.— One of the rules ordered that the Keeper of the Jail should examine all correspondence carried on by pri soners on the Crown side, and not forward any letter which contained improper matter without skewing it to the Chaplain or onesof the Visiting Magistrates. Ines tie letter was submitted to the proper persons, if the letter' came to a prisonea, he was sent for, and* * unexceptionable parts were read to him t..ii r tititi tutee; was written by a prisoner, he was told what, were the esceptioaable parts, and had the liberty a rievrritieg that which was not offensive. Tide ride swim oedema! by Mr. Justice Bayley, mail he helletml sins filthe of that Learned Judge him self ; end the.whOe of the code wu sauctioned hi Mr. Mr. PEEL bad understood the Hon. Wisher Om tablish his case upon two propeeitioss ; first, that for any one to open a letter freshet' by bias was In act, and secondly, that it woe *breed. of the pelei-- leges of Parliament. Noeeilf be applied Itiserelf trY disprove both these proposition, be limited that 114 should be considered to meet the quistiii tarty, He certainly had beard with Inch aurprise,,spos a for* user occasion, the doctrine laid dams by the Mom. awl Learned Member for Winebeisesspes this eubjese; and he thought that the Hos. and Learned Member, himself, upon consideration, would be rrii to el% that be bad taken too wide a groainl,4o•2lobl Lord who spoke last had pot tie House 1s Pelfillaioe of the facts of the present ease, as foe :alt.eellieded the rules and regulations itemplaingd 04 .Whose re gulations had been salsetiosed by Mr. Justice Park and Mr. Jamie.* Doyley. latim fire! plum, he thought there was strong presatbptiog iii'faeour of the legility„ Of the act, in the fact of the 'Jades baring ilgestl the roles which antbatised it. Apd that, too, net without consideration,: for he understood that ibex altered some of them, and that the case which gave the power of opening letters, wattle the hand-writing of Mr. Justice Bayley. He therefore coot-elm& not withstanding the authority of the? Hon. Member' for Carlisle, that nothing illegal base bees committed.-,- The Hon. Member had appealed to the Act of George 11. which bore so reference to the• present case, sod at the same time neglected to sides a more resent Act passed in the 31st of George 111. under which these regulations had been made. The former Act applied to debtors only. The lion. Member bad read to the House the title and preamble of that Act, sod be would follow his example by stating the contests of the preamble to the other. It was on act for regu lating jails and other places of confinement. The preamble set forth, that for the better government of such places, rules and regulations, and bye-lows should be made by persons authorised so to do In the Act of George 11. And who were those persons? the Magistrates. And upon that Act the Judges bid an• doubtedly sigoed the rules of "bleb the Hon. Member complained. With such sigsatgre affixed to the orders for a:doming tame- ediembe gels, iodated, that It I would be wasting- the time, and altuilatthktiodol fleece of the honer, to dwell' bey leitXfe•kiemi the question of their illegality. He. *MAW the consideration, whether or not a breach of thprivi leges of Pei-Bement bad been committed. For the sake of argument, he must get the Hmsearable Mem ber to concede, that the rale which gothorififid the Act of opesing the letters of pet/meet WM Willi Mid,. And be would contend, that if it:llititoluidhl in law, there was nothing whiels could exempt g.filteim bee of Parliament from shar p% its common Opera tion. The only privilege which s Member of parlia ment possessed was that of franking his letters; but they were as liable to be opened by the authority of the law as those of any other individual is the state. The Act contained no clause which exempted a Meow ber of Parliament from its operation, and it bid hi therto been suffered to apply to all parties, without distinction. The Honourable Member had alindea to the letter of Lord Siilmotak'tia j the keeper of Glou cester gaol. , That letter was *ratio in seesequeace of a complaist made to the House of Lends from two p -mons co/tamed is Gloucester geel, one of whom was a debtor, and. the other confined for a misdemeanor, which complaint *as referred to the Law Officers of the Crown. His belief was, that the word " felons" occurred in the letter by mistake. His Lordship meant to have written " debtors and lines." He bad referred to the opinions of the Law Officers. and there he found the words " debtors and fines." He had oleo mentioned the circumstance to • Lord Sidmouth himself, and his Lordship concurred in the supposi tion, that the mistake had either been made by him self or by the clerk in copying his letter. The case which led to the Report of 173.5, was with the Post office. And in a case where a letter had been pat into the Post office and then opined, undoubtedly there was a breach of privilege. But that was no case in point to the question b7ffure the house. Be fore the letter was put in the post, the Magistrates, upon the authority of the law, demanded that cer tain regulations should he complied with. But in the case of 173,5, the Resolution expressly declared that a gross breach of privilege had been committed, by opening a letter add d to a Member of Parlia ment at the Post.office. The Hon. Member had stated, that in defending the privileges of the House upon this occasion, lie iris defending the liberties of the people. He (Sir. Peel) trusted that no Member of that house would ever claim privileges which Were not, In fact, the privileges of the prople.—(Hear, hear!)—The It'ght lion. Gentleman, after again enforcing the position - that Members of Parliament had no exemption tram the re , gulationa in question, founded as they were upon the law of the land, concluded by moving the previous question. ' Mr. G. BENNET could not agree to the doctrine laid down, that a body of Magistrates and two Judges Lad the power of legislating and making fresh laws for the government of prisons. All they could do by the Act was to regulate the laws already made, sada as appoist ing the tins* of labour, managiwethediet .4 ordering arrangements of that nature. 'lf they had' the po*erat tributed to them by the Right Hon. Grodramo. they' had the power of changing lie years simptir i seg ment to •five years solitary conMeement. He t sone of the taw authorities would boldly state that hail mole power. • The' eil-culai' of 'Lord ap. plied to fiefs as well as elebtoritimbti the opiniol of Law Officers at that period expressly saidtbet the la antlid not apply manes. le tbsougie the Judges b milk dosed alrule by which esti aid felorowere ego* mitord MIL Heitegged moat his *tanks to-the gilt Hon, fieseklums. fiertmorlng tag preihaus idealists Jll4 floor thou putting a negative duns the propositioe of IfoasurabletPnead. The ptreimis question only •71 (i • .'4" tee& 4 ot T/ It2emeettbeet the eporatiolh:et 1 kW, . this esters.. Weeildi-ilty use my that . Missiweet I a right t. holiViskeetima latemearse •with OApts.% while others lititer.tiehted it ?: li i te l42li l A'ltet# , no) 'Hewed pereitillnieelikereth b .iWilgstesk, they hold latercotirei,,ky)itter ? was tisk* Nig rimed that there wa ms! isit-My witiola hieesheessii Paeliamest bad gestakelsividegeo of - . • with felons, or yerioso , 'eselidell for miodesseemelle; then any other clue of' "ii the state. ' '''' Hr. SUMBA!. did no= Hutt' did Right Hon. rotary or/keit bad mode oat 'a salficieetly straw to rebel the opinies of the,Mon. Mover. He Mt it would he much testae to man the risk •I damage which might arise Rom a fro* istoreoerse Oki prisoners by lettere, then Ite allow the Aimee of !them acts ',enmity sad 'prided") to . Which the cokes seed regolatlesicompleisest ofisiglit Jiro dem' ~ Sir R. WILSON sisoo,l4,b. fly as attar ' woke to preemies**. bet 'hem oreseme which bolsi the present ease in the reign of William aid Mary.--. 4 It was a Reseletioe of the House, "that any letter beteg broken °pea wbleh came frees, or was directed. to, 'a Member of Parliament, as a "breach ef Ihit,pik, Jrileget of this House." When he serr,,oht Rope* whitth the Lexamisaieners had made as SO Ole stateef Ilebeeter gaol, he was of opinion that Wisher gaolers Per Magistrates snakes be treated, and that Members sf Parliament ought to hare the freest access to pri ions, in order to prevent such practices. • Mr. C. WYNN was of opinion. that neither a breach of the privileges of that House, nor the, law of the laid. bad bees committed is the pewit lastasee.— The act clearly extruded no farther Mims the Post trace. aid the privileges of •Mombereeiet so farther than as reittrded the Post-eflice:' Wbei they l ooked at the precedent of the resolethie of 'aos, i, ~,,,,,,lii be well to look to the cases which lido, Hist rowels lion. The ease was a eomplaist kook Om lost-maims at Hull against the Governess of that "pkee. who area iI. the practice of seeding for eber Malik** red opeio - what letters he chose. H. bellifed that the &it whfilt had been referred to, rare the Igegletratse the; power which they hed.ozereked‘ Before thossacte Were passed, the gaoler ideseteßhad t the power ofeloiag any thing which be bold essesearw tothe.saleitnepler of the poi and the safe enetedrot the peskier*. ..Hr . could then place priseseta le solitary.sieflemweat tor refractory conduct. or for dimes miss( the eegetliis Oahe of the pekoe. To puce that power lathe. head, of Magistrates better qualified . to eterroiss it.,was tbs. 'Wool of the Acta. arid be bad so doubt of thrill having now the power of orderiag solitary eeafinemest, where ilemimamtmes callod'for it. The arils to which a ri miest of the power if examinisg letters wopld gke ✓ise, . were of the meet lawless character. h might - 4d the escape of primmer*. of defitet the idiotism et :es& fenders msaseeted with others *beady spriaiessidskl4e Bien (althoseleit wasan entities cave) pikes might be coareyed to Misdeals by litter, so ;to eatM, them to avoid stefferingthe sestences or - Iltr.„ i ' b saw so result whatever why the piatlpit:ist Ow - ... nourable Illembte . shoal& receive the Sliipert of: house. , .: , Mr. BROUGHAM said; that his first °skies- as to the present ease being e clear breach -et' the privi. leen of that Haase was eery strong.' Bet be had Waited to heat the opiates 'orhie Right Honourable and Learned Plink (Mr. Wylie) who bad long be.. the sealoes defender of the privileges of Parlissneot on one side of the Howie, and who. be hoped. wesid now cooties* to be so on the other; and barker heard all that thoJearsing of hie Right Honourable and Learned °Poised could advance against that -opi nion, he dill feel it very considerably strengthened. The privileges of that House were not to be rode over by any regulations which a bench of Magistrates might choose to adopt. If so. where would the prin. ciple end ? Any act, however poss. however clearly in violation of the law, if it had bet the sanction of thwee Alagistrates and two Judges, the privileges of Parliament must be set aside mod trampled Upon. Another doctrine advanced Wes, that the privileges Of Members only extended to the Post-office. He. contended that the Report of 1735 was restricted to. 'the Post-office, because it wee a case where letters had been opened at the Post-office which gave rise tout it. if any ether ease bad Galled for their attention, he was convinced that the great men on both sides' of the House, Whig and Tory, would have been unsei , mons in their decitlon to the same effect. Hs shoulsl be glad to know what was to asafte it a breach of pri vilege for the Post-office alone to epee liters of Mem bers of Parliament. Members enjoyed this privilege in order that their correspondence with their Genesi toents and with the people at large might be free and unimpeded; and whether that correspondence were interrupted by a servant of the Government, or of the public, in a post-office or In a jail, it was equally a breach of their privilege. The resolution alluded to by his Hose. and gallant Friend (the Member for Soatbwsrk,) was not one which referred to the Post-office. The Hon. and Learned Member then described the ease alluded to of the Governor of Hatt, and contended, that the general resolution then agreed to was exactly similar to that now proposed by his Hon. Friend. It was no argument against this privilege that it was liable to abuse, becalms the same objection might be arced against all other privileges. Privileges should be judged by their use, not by Hocir abase. Natty of the privileges of that House had been abased to m shameful an extent that the abases would not bear,re-; eital. A Member et the lest Parliameot had, by IlOr shale of 'ltalia/dirge, redpeottasanypersoas to peso" l e f ret""11 so par 41, do lia Amide ever himposso rty to a relation, sod' arta/ se this freeddleat estaveyamea bad his •, 'be kept-Ilds person, tad' many of Ms creditors to tke Primus he su - well Jr , • NoPle • reach o haiku! law *Me it sPonibi" I his pbservatiot Opted apes , ,ceded dee settarlty of the re,* lon itilifel s o b y ipotesi argoseiZt ,ottal taiga ittalesen if txtelartisa rT fibre.. The Moo. Maralmotbsewhaded by anietaisie " Mato weeks , Mae jostles(' Dieting his own Jimmie:, 'citlei. tie order giros himh the Magistrates. :Tie Illammese of LONDONDERRY would wry "Wetly esplair ter engin upon which be should Ara his vote. lie regarefeel the present motion as 'ihlsg two quiritimea, see of law. the other of priii. lege. And Ii was to be observed, tbat if an! oil ego knows to the hews bad been committed, the fed i°. if the House against dm modes weeded rot takeaw ay legal remedy. ex lemma the punishment for that lot".lbeesrfetibealhalli)reoetselier".6e74lll4lMiefriagiassisces'ilielirgiwasigliel:lottibcoirbieljegratniti"tillismallentssalicoatiehafdabiowrentureastails ses f ll:r the :a ( hl i i h :lit e :T x 3l (l es. *ll i sues.) bad heard the question dim:used, the weals. tions of the prises altuied to were perf ectly lett!, and it would therefore not heeonse the Howe is urea ride the law. Tfieninestion was, whether the Rim ,nould at that usemnent state its privilege so broadly is to declare that ee.ty erhoner hall a right to wad ettere to every Meen6e4ett Periliturat„ aw l that every Moniker of Parliament bail a right so seed Waste ry prisoner, moil that 'Afro should be no right is p ; one, under any eirrueistabees, to epee the letters • f the House was to do this, what jailer "raid re ,. sure to open toy Irtthr at oft for the fitter s? --(,fear, a How was eery jelleg to lospri the bud writ. gof the ble nshers of that Mouse ? He really erred in the rules einspielatil • ot ne 'auseesisary ir. gement of the *object, air/ as RID/. mid he we of that Hostreanod the primmereeiew the Mosel niin.—(Gbeern froet the Dppoeitilitil ' He begged that he usigbrept 6e mistme(irstoots" Airfoi l/ 40'c Home to Ise . opetitei - the he:ail:4 orafl 'complainr, if 01 real bead; fide . ittriermadist WOW Olt mot err to lay dui/alba tb• Meniti i iVesw,ii lralllikih sr Ilnitif foi i' they red ,.....,—,.,!paredirif4sg:firc.4l4B::ti.Liad . ih tn: e s c lY :u ir ld as . v.': sot prepared d ell wi to bite ge."l6l"l Vl6l, Walla" e i s of all 1 . 11 .'1 114 1 64 .74 ' ' Illiti litn ile t) ge S ' ad he Mainly was wit sire of Obi I'o4l irttlele wield be • iced by ate epioselary. enerripoudeiers. De was eel Ong that I. elf gaols Inslial,Milliatle Ihe'jeilere it te. oho letters of tits Meoshottrof that 1 it / 4 wield mitt tiliciakt)til tpotothai ralosA * eati6 ti t , or too hastily; ig4 t hl,woold therefore rein •tha re lima of bk Right Hos. Friend. bees* ibectilmtoseer ' ploimed of, if offence it was, snit hump* pp, tied before the eosperhat.ollosta:7lf iiitVol *obi mem, whether theme mkt% which haabika .4,24 by two Jot wort. legal or not; bewelirtaittre les . pert he noedieposed-to push thie"bi I piivilegs the extent Sought by tbe original. cooties. r. Mr. DENMAN; said, the Nettle' Martinets lad tad ON Pretest, partly as a gentian of bait bit fiat. be (Mr. Ii) 'thought was dee question the least proper for the eoreidiestioo of the House. He whited the Noble Marquess bad stated how the ease meld really be brought before a Court of Law. It is a question of privilege altogether. With respect to tie trine of the Noble 11 / ord as to secret co:responders Ds Members, and into real boas fide grievaneecit e siis be evident that *lsere the grievance was real, teas bean fide, the eorreepondence mast be secret.— tit ‘ eilr, hear.)--Withoitt such a correspomietece, how could the woret•of Nom horrible Bastile, the flames jail have beer disarmed ? Whenever a complaint had been made'apietirt• the conduct of that Jailer, wilt reference was made to the regalations signed by the Judges:—(Cheer.)--and what testimony was beret to the banners conduct of that Jailer !—('Cbeeirs from the Opposition.)--Yet; when inquiry had takso place, it was diseor-red that sever had rates beep more in fringed than those' very roles, and never bad coodoei bees worse than that Of this very Jailer. la messy cons the doctrine of the Noble Marquess would err the person complaised of the judge of his own etw diet; for he might, of course, pot the letter, eos• plalolog of that conduct, into the fire. and thus pre* best Al inquiry. —(Cheers.)—This was not an gro mmet draws from the doctrine of the Noble Harsirs; it was the doctrine itself. He (Mr. D.) highly re. speeted the individuals who had signed the repils• floss is question; but he was sore they kid never contemplated the ordering of am thiof whieb would clash with the privileges of than."' Sir Samuel Itotailly was strongly of opinion crest the right which had belie now aseume,}. He adoilw a that the use of attempted subornation of perjr% montioned by the Hun. ;Wernher (Mr. H.) was a ref lend one; but the principle, if allowed, would also d isrive a prisoner of the power of comosnokating the tenth. sod of corresponding in eosfideoce will' l ie legal advisers. if the present question should be de Bided sgaiast the privilege, there would be an eel to . Lipower of the House to iftiaire into the a bases et a. Hail this principle been adhered to, ti.' ntemnoas Rattles of lichester would never have be' , o settee ir t hi n cb r h re a o d ul ...ihr d etnhocasecriperdacotinceatheorfeturaarere bee f 4 laboiiiiied. He could wit ad,kit the formed tbe sr& ent, that there would be a di&ulty in the Jails t o odetteking toillittinonish the hand-writing of 1/0' II j. for tbo letters would of course go tbroagb 1111 rwet-Oiss. sot he then authentic ewd. He trwr the Mouse emeriti me she neersoity, in the ? resin!'" ' dotes. of supporting its ON a privileges. Pritrito! irrichntlight to be the happiest thin in theist 1"11110:4* wooogewi with the fertile(' of blieistera-: tokens tsloiliellit , Oppweitibn)--whea It was hill" ..X * * . • sothisir about ovredgir .;;:no Isola weesiand ,ticeyaorercad hirrbseeelei.inwrhli)etwasill:en,hirhillite:44":7:rit , but the prae- Jocks Ba a r th. r • between him • . . ! ' " 41 If-OENBRAL * . ten between Members of po r ii riorst „d the i • * . ♦ o 1 neatest*, had and upon that growled esotended that* bre"oacliplecl licationshontd • to would gig, • privikgs had been twonsittaii. He felt an habitue! ita i dt rte d heminsaignil astjaan and that twa tto would not haze . d asiesu niair duty I!!! . • had "* 114 . ' 4 .higormatouci . 11 : ... 4 40 eml weal hi . 11114 unsiminat. "" I 7 all: veneration for the high authority by which the rri c i, . dmastimat robessesaimea.aidsm a .ha et vit ugsaimit 7 iiii r:liet a i• f o t.7 o : mi ta , it as .ham ih ulow is:ail tairlihrto were saoet t i opeirmiem osed aware of the of the fraokolit Plea* of hPalpor, rat ,Ater .• Ntalr bey were, they the operatioilif the Olsen rola , was edio eb t - rai tiaate W SIM op ene d ancept asc or bi c ', s. -it was others Mettles amire ibto to isheliffits • itear:lgalablrlerlolllooll6 w as l ibel b c , * ta iga co too subjel. , c INISt itthl ladtWlßC , Plabiebe .4l o lll o l 141 " e lf to hesitate to giro his anscat, iyi ni i go i‘ ast 3 4. 1 0 - rt 'oaf tae own part het . ha eorta smaa loty seil di . d for ceit ageition tifitit th thas'lroitorto ia L s "ma attar. what their franks contained ? It Wit 116dihit' h tee ' sio nal li a. was L et t t t rn ill okoolo c all " .14 . wa n asosori " es ke . ffal . . of justi ce. hear.)-.4.111111 beware the asoins'of exibmtter "iittsethil ; , that ioelhied to ho• pr6per is its intars and dabopis„ia i!atp , h """ *J leheetse aol, tic wane, lan fli,ft e laW it hem of vide‘ which @whit ce of which he CPan'tb• e p r i asaos Ai i i 4 g a.ipase ,ammed . :w w h ard ers s e li n aat ter :: ht . j°4l A7ci r"l?'9 l , l ree .. Bll Ho " atoesd "Pal -th i a li t e i thie si"l ns e gl i a u:4e ° ii h u i ; he walftwratu theca was aothiack the Parliamentary A. House. • „i Ile. T.l l fea WM., Pa • ! head Ilia a' saaketiaittWetior of the law, and Reform, and fo r too tritercreises the • . L.- Mr_ PRRI. had andarstaadi alba Hata. be" ParlhaW o4 imas CW"al" IN" o f receded th...06.61..r. . - . - -.: :j~. «~ , • • --'4lll-`7,o'' .s':st~ - 7 .--1 `~:~caz 14irdik .tmit = MI6 ~? >#O.L i li din* `e ,Ily I ?~ , ~1~