The Statesman. — London, England, 1810-02-24 00:00:00

kern 16 aft. advice. *P . ha Irr; k before :ter ey du gosh fluuiv Cum. ijrsty, Cu"". `~ I. 'it! Cr on , M i • • Jetty, )rub ot i oah ,"14reiLiZ • rep, EQUtli !nd (Ni t; to th e w lice ' not t , !JOIN 1 .1 stair,/ t torte L b it that mi t d ill.; As to q t . , bit thAt r cp iiiiot !isc ret i tni resty f or tatter o ' •PI ►g'r oir nut'. the City utd h av - e uut h ave l it to be dare, I, r dt C ut runt any, Tt.Ma r. tuurable Oil that „to the 413estiOff Wir-ltilneurrigihremeao, 4 er as it for him, if liked documents, wereallta. e• ~ to hate a nswe r e d i n tlys negative / ELoed 1 a..., :fs of hear; howl The Riflit Hun. Gob. ( 1 1, :n:4 Ti (the Chancellor of the Etchequer)eteted,' th3t h e can by nn titesoi see in the narrative °fake N o ble Lord any redcction cast upon the eharasaci r N o ble Rickard Strachin, or OD that pert of the ro il force employetl ill the ,Expedition to the s;llvldt. I venture to tin -t it such paper' ha b s ~,,w , upna both a great Land gvidstous rideetioc ' r i my . , ?.,,,, 1.: So feels the gallant and distinguith: b it „ : r ...r hisuself ; and after what has been elicit j ( r .,,:i the ex ..itination of the Noble lord (Chi. t v :14 ,,) !,,, night, Sir Richard Strachat, al so feeli ow , seated situstion in which he is placed; ho „ ~e himself says, 46 flaw do I. know, wren if 1 rrp:l all the charges conveyed against me in : b,, survive, that after all, a soscond and third d , x itriwiit i:iiil:fly constnunicated, in fact, edition 4,1 ., ) ,,i... : editi en, will nut h.. forth com i ng ?” r . i,if, ,iceo• 1 Ii this a proper state in which ~. i :N:' i 4 Iso has deserved well of his coon. tn .? 1. this the reward which illy Llouse would , h .vite, for 4 lire devoted to tile Miliioll:s service? p.,..,:y iced as are the feeling of my gallant 1., ; •11, lie suleri not alone ; there is .not an ,r . t; of bis professiOn hitt sympathizes with hjm. T:,r 1 .1.: 1 / 4 all ranks of 'that profession it is the ow , wally with those who haec not interest to te op pi iyest, or with those whom other causes h ir e istely kept out of the actual 4 4 wise of „,,f.ssional dutiai:* Surtttivia Houso. should ; ow i tse lf in atipitnrt of Picts - conduct,. it „„1,1 nut only allect the living, but ani s* the 4.a.1 ; it would arouse in indig. pe jo even 01.1 Admiral Denbow, and all those v ia g all.intly imitated him, frion• their graves. (4 !alzi, and cries of hear!) Tisis oneslion, ,:iishog u; 011 its own merits, cannot he benefited, gh l oug!it not to be iiiiiiied by party feeling. It j.. 1 qui:vital 4,r iii•fice—•of justice to a gallant i 41;,:vr, tit,. idol of the service, covered with the loners bostowed by a grateful country, remu. ~,l a, e o by the liberality of Parliament, anal in. st ool by his Sovereign with a r• d ribbon, as a I lur k o f his ;Loyal favour, Pear, hear !] Jr ! ii fur such a than, flow labouring under such A m ” a, this narrative so communicated con. ~71, t h a t I appeal to the Rouse of COMMILLOS. C an it fVfnlle to do him justice? With what vaster, if such shook/ be it* cotuitict,,coidd its Newberg look is tbell,Fa....f the people af Eng. baJ? CouLl tltsi "ittjo, 10104 suliritinktheir re. anion, " Constittientk,oopport me 'gait', one .sf whose .hints to your pl , iier uft eg is, that by rot. jog whist a certain attar.* tootle Crows, I de. pito) o7,,itthtat and &seating otficug, illustrious troi many scrviaes, of the npportunity of repel. lilt charges and ovations dtrogratory to his high ihrlinir, which wriceseviretly end clandestinely con_ riot aganisthiarl • Soieteign." Ellear,heir!) t I beg leave to ask, Oen: one Moinber in this Ilnuir, who dee* lit .ions bean believe, that al.. beech the Noble LiskOlyisteed to answor. still that halo., tlelivervelothel *Oa to ilk! Cro w n ? [ hew, huorl] I hid anist he i.., this. was a quvition free' free faceiaesk*atttilitm. it is ass ► attack upon the; blot o f ass inritliloal, end like an invasitkn, ought lignite ea Ailis sue conanson object of defence. For eiyae!f, I fetliii:ou:rih'say, that IFlhave the Issas: of beiiig in'the etinfillottv of 'OM gallant -1 05tcr, and 1 trust, my &intim. to big interests .4,11 prove the sincerity of my feeling. It remains but fat me to advert fit certain circumstances, in as4ser to the charges contained in the Noble Coal's variative' relative to eke disippolistmen he experienced from the position •of the Navy, .I;er the Army had latosle.l its IValchereto. .111 .the fiat plare, it is stve.l, that live drys toad cispsed before any part „f the naval furec had pr,peeissled up the S. beide. Now, Sir, I have only anises' to refer to that part of Sir Richard bun examination, whirls . states that I had my. ktt, alth.sixtesu sail of sloops of war, and fifty m.:trats, gone up in forty.six hours, and actually .Fl its that interval burned the advanced boat of. 'l l .r enemy's flotilla. It is next averred, that Lord Cutharn slid write to Sir Richard Strartiass a let. ter, dated the 4th .of- August, to' which he re. csivrti no answer eutil the SW Now the fact was, that the letter of Lord Chatham of the 4th vas not received by . Sir Richard until•the morn. hog of the sth, and es it referred to a twisty itt loP4cs, he conaidecod It more respectful to vralt l "P" his Lasdaitip porpouolly, which he did in the course of Oft day,- [Hear l] unwilling, as Sir Richard wes, , to sacri fi ce his public duty to , l the delay whi c h whin would occasion. It was most true, that be 41d not send for 4 hours alto the interview with Lord Chatinui the later of the ilth, white was merely a word of Os conversation which at that interview had then plan, upon a variety of 'topics con. Sealed with the public service. I Moo also Nth) , to state, that nvr Gallant Friend did proffer to Lord Chathsts v . filet 11 befouled any thlay in commenting tits Itiotbardmentof ing upon the land.side, he (Sir Richard) brae flatly with six sail of She line to lay biome aside the walls of that fortress. (Hew s hop !) Was sl4s a proof of a want of zeal or stogy ? Was lath an offer an evidence of that maritime inter ruption and disappointment, upon which so much lull been said ? Did the Noble Lord in his dig. Pitches hint at that interruption, ise, on the eon. Iraq, diktbot his Nasegyric upon the navy increase Proportion to the ditliculties it bed surmounted ? Never, until the 14th of February, did we hear that the Noble Lord had changed his opinion— that day when was presented this corrected, re. Incd, secreted narrative. I have to conclude by expressing my earnest hope, that no man will be f. '"d in thin [louse this night, endeavouring by a sophistical - and Tallacious species of argumentation, to 0 dissuade it from r u ti n ., for the proposed Ad , drew General LOFTUS contended, that after Sir R. Strachm's letter of the 27th of Aug. Lord Chat. ' him could not do less than draw up such a narra. live in his own justification. Mr. a. WARD statpd, that if it could be. Proved to hire, that such a document as the pro. Owed Address alluded to, was in eiistelice, he ' J ta as far as the Hon. Meter to him it pro- . .. • _ _ 1~ ~ ~_.~l . Pt. tioutwaerantedi a tsiere iskliio 'ire-nap/it Et - TI rail:- me/IUP then ;laid a letter from the Admiralty •to *Sir MIAOW. date. Vier di/ subsequent` to threlsC Wortto the King o f- L ord Chatham's ' Nerr attvip..' lo in which the Head of that deriartment'offereCio: Be the channel of conveying to' his Majesty ent itttemeot witiCla Sir Richard St rac h an should OA gitoper to draw up. The Ron. Member cited this ts i proof of the feeling which actuated those who dultt, from theit Stations, feel a natural in tet.in the characters of naval officers. • tiSir S: ROME/4Y observed, that as his Right onourable'Friend (Mr. Ward) had stated, that were he satisfied the paper was in existenCe he YirQuld vote for the Addr e ss, he (Sir S.) thought it in his power wholly to remove his doubts. fie-had only to remind him of his fennel profes sional habits. ;le had only, to remind him, that in a Court of ju s ti ce , if a witness produced refoied to give an answer to a question, purporting to in quire whether he had piesented such a paper or not, the Judge would direct the jury to take it for granted that such a document wisin existence Dear, hear !] But even though it were not in existence, that wotild be with hint in additional reason for voting for the Address. Match hid been said of jealotisles being created heiween the two branches of our service. What then was the best method to get rid of such apprehensions? Cif banishing from the possibility of continuance,stich lamenta ble suspicions? Nothing could be more efficarious far such a salutary Introit.; than - 1144 Addreis ;.4 the answer to which would prove, if such papers were not presented,' that there was no ground foi entertaining such suspicions. Independent of these considerations, the privileges of that.llouse were' materially involved in the question. During an investigation at the Bar, a Peer of the Realm was Asked relative to certain papers. Ile refused to Answer. As a Peer he was protected from those co. ercive means which the House could put in force against a Commoner. What then became of its inqui. sitOrial authority ? It did fortunately happen, that the House, in this case, had other means of arriving at the sane end. Those means were by address. , If the paper was in existence at all, it was in the Imola of his Majesty, anti who was he that could doubt that his Majesty would not cheerfully pro. deco it to his faithful Commons ? (Hear, hear 0' Did the nonce recollect the strong means resorted to on a late. Inquiry to compel a witness to pro. doe.) a paper (alluding to the case of Captain Maley Sandott)? Was it even satisfied with the production of the one document ? or,_slid it not, in the exercise of its inquisitorial capacity, seize upon all the papers contained in the private escru. toire of that individual, and refer them to the con sideration of a Select Committee ? Will then the House, while it reflected upon its course of pro.- et:citing in a recent case,. refuse to irotefor an ad dress, intreatinr f ur t h e produetion of a &tett. meat, which, if it does exist, is most important to the inteu'ests of justice, and which, if not in existence, mist wholly remove all those sealskin , ' which, lung atootinsted, must be replete with lois. ehievotts consequences ? 's.. 'Sir JOUN ftivs . riw'rit ER, Wished to rem the :Muse of 'f he critical fiittiario4 'in 'Which till • wee . placed. .Ucibmvrclolved _fawn the full( Inquiry, into The pithey airitresruirct fer pedition to the.'Seiveldt." Therfted -entered upon that Inquiry, and What did the now ifop . at' Evidence. A matter a evidOce i s eats w hich . was net:vinery to Bin c l arsrrrr; on of . t!tat Inquiry to the fullatt..igiget—lnd now.th•• !4,ea: lion was, whether they would tik e the iv)! I steps to secure that evhienee 11 . they wets serioult in the Inquiry, they could not, °skdefy. refuse to call for that farther evidence. Why. was. tho paper. in qnistion :to be kept hack ? B..cause it affected the aecused. lie could imagine no other reason. fur' withholding it. And then it would go to establish the prin. ciple, that only so much evidence should • he adoliteril as suited the wishes the person'accused. If it was meant to be a fair Inqniry—it the House were really in earnest iwthe prosecution of that Inquiry, how could th.'y hesitate for a mo ment to call fur any evidence that might ba rea sonably supposed calculated to throw light upon the progress of that Inquiry ? In fine, he thought that if the Iloese meant to put the two services :upon an equal footing—if they did - notowish to suiuggle the consistent prosecution of the Inquiry, or any of the accused parties, bellottl the King's name, they could not well hesitate to accede 'to the motiost of his Honourable Friend. • The ATTOR N 111 Y-G.EN ER AL, in a short spocch opposed the motion. He thought that ,Lord• Chatham did not refuse to answer any ques. tiun arising immediately out of the conduct and management of the . Expedition ; and as to the question . that was put and nut answered, he 'thought that it wait but fair Lo that Noble Lord that' the ease should stand as N' such a' question had net been put. Lie observed ton, that the question wastiot put crimbiatory on Sir Rickard Strachan, and therefore the refusing to answer to it ought not to be considered as throwing•any impu. lationOpon that Officer. Mr. BATHURST:briefIy supported the motion. Hi said, that his Majesty's Ministers did not op pose the motion made a few days ago for the pro. duction of the written statement handed to his Ma. jesty by Lord Chatham. Supposing that the mo tion then,,instead of being for that paper, or such a paper, hail been for any papers communicated to: his Majesty by Lord Chatham relative to the Ex pedition to the Scheldt; he wished to know if Mi. nisters would have opposed any such m o ti o n ? li e did not think they would; and if they would not, he could not conceive a reason Why they might not agree to the present motion. it hid, hoinwer, been said by the Honourable Mover, that he as. sumod that there was in that .paper some matter criminatbry o others in the conclart of that Et pt ._ ditioto. lie Flid not know upon what grounds that HotiourableQentleasint had made any sueltras. s.umption. lint it had been said upon the other r aide, that those who supported the motion were a ll a l ong ! legg i n g s the question ; 'that the. whole • • was a petitio denied it.' They Nt net jistifiasle in "aveanting Ike vaiA.;:nce of ant . • I, `T , s • WNW , istifiable is itein4l — fit: 7 7ll:;;;;;;;; wli 7ili r gre t.76ittat•ot .htr nun( ly.pryvb, tisat accounts 'were Orinieur. rota ilihieh 'were- known sot to-be In exist. " therefore if 4et us. argument &Oast the lientent motion to ix,' that was doubtful whether the paPer•catiedfc.•..txisted Or not. But he would ask, wit there a Mau in thit.ilnide who doubted the existence of the paper In. question? Did any tionourable . Gentleman affirm that it did not exist? Did his Right Honourable Friend (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) fora moment contend, that there was out such paper ? He thought that fur these rea sons the House must accede to the motion. Mr: CANNING said, that he begged the can. did atteption of the House, while he stated to them frankly thereasons that inftuenced him to give the vote he intended to give upon the question now be. fore them. Perhaps the shortest, the simplest, and the fairest course would be for him to state, that he was long of opinion that the more forts. nate mode of proceeding would have been in the first instance to have referred the whole question of the conduct of that Expedition to a Court of Inquiry—not that the decision of that Court was neeesvarily in any degree to bind the judgment 1 or fetter the subsequent proceedings of that House. Butt upon the first return of the per sons commanding in that Expedition Grier its failure, he had been anxious to see the nar ratives of-those who held the command of either services, the Army and the Navy. He -could _refer to persons who then heard him, and who. could bear w - grielfi that - such wrt-itieswialt.aod. pectati'on ; but at that time it was generally un derstood; that there were no such narratives in existences at 'gait if there had been any suspi. chins that Aire were such narratives, which bad been foiWaided to his Majesty, through 'the due and customary channel of one of the State Secre tariet, all..kaeli suspicions most , have vanished, when in the papers laid upon the table of the House, by his Majesty's command, 110 such docu. omits were to tic found. But how did the case now stand? It carne out that there were such papers, or at least such a paper did exist,and such a paper certainly Was not. to be 'found in the do 7 elements first laid upon the table of. that House. [Mar, hear!] Then it was for the House to consider in what situation they were placed.— They had determined to enter upon inquiry of the' gravest and the most important nature ; and in the course of prosecuting that inquiry, they bare heard of something th a fias excited in thely minds a strong suspicion of the existence of deuce that, if corm at, might materially lid them. iii their progress. Nom, it was. nit a sufficient objection to the proposition so put, to say that it was merely conditional ; for lie thought that, di motion would have gained it great object In' Other case ; if there was such a paper it ought.tei be asked for ; if there was not, BO asking frkt . it would .ascertitin, that it did. -nag exist. and therefore it (Sight to- be asked _(ur at elk • .~ . _ ~- - As 40 center iirfibe.ptaetett peaces. An 410 M 111 6 111 4, 114940410.44 , :1111164 bi5t. bud and, ti be theight the pipe was lateritiesseo r , 2 ho *add vote for its yrodettiosi. This was n e a t atilt! 400.6111411... .This misgiving more than iii his Judgm e nt it was fair to take; for were he a Minister, and that hp knew of the eiistence.Of such a papir, aid that kaciiin . g its . eiistence, he seas. of course aware of its contents, he could not sax; but that there mix& he_ itt those contents, the which, Wouldieduce hire to hesitate in egreeieg the prodectioe ,of such a paper. Besides, hi t thought that the converse of that statemeol, would have been better jadged ; and that to rota • for the motion because he believed there was no such -paper; would be a faii means of bringing the matter to a decisive test. If the motion was agreed to, and that they sot the return of nil, it would be a satisfactory return; Yet ,no one could say, that the motion was unnecessarily made, , because . there prevailed a general suspicion that there did exist such a paper, and .that tt contained matter; , he believed , in his conscience, to be much exig, Berated and greatly misconceived . He conclude* by again exPreasieg his diaatiprobation of the itC \- regular, and, he thought, unconstitutiooal of giving in papers of that descriptien,a,s be coa l ceived that the usual organs would have been More . preferable. lie purposely, declined' Saying ally thing in allusion to the tiling appeal so feelingly' made by an houourable and galtdatjafceir. The SOLICITOR-GgNEntl: a , li satisfied of the propriety of opposing the motion,.. upon the very same principles whi c h b a d Ob e n stated by .fili 4 ht Hon. Friend. for suppciOilig ;ilia,. he utatetilliea;Ttitt • rtrertriPstrapetistiategy-irbatelek-...., • between the two cases quotectll•ida Right lion r • Friend. For, in the one case, the r paptie . eras is - existence, and referred to theitkpeditiosili.i4 • Scheldt ; but in the other case, in that tq , ,Kbihis motion alluded, it • did not. appear Htet;.,theri, was any paper whatever—indeed it was alleged that there was us such paper. iii. spy of tk Ministerial Offices. Suppose the eareatiii of 1.0 Chatham was, kept imekby Mi n ist e r s; supposeAt were a paper _which they did not dirtsige„,,w) would the House think o r them ? C . /.4114r014:te • On the .conttary, they foiled this' ,itaper,", A Z his Bight ILK. Fri m! peodeeed4t like an bo man. But *oat was. his Right _ Honourable" • to do in . pursuance of thi4 motion.? IYett . • s • mended that he - should go ititoilhe liteeiMpree lairs to.search for any eommutrjeatious,t l llo..ll# tie found there with respect to the Schehtt? .- it to be contegded that if kpii*ate let er apont - • . public subject. were addressed to the4ineresX% that letter was to be ishi before the riesiie,: had any allusion to the matterof this metiden,?,:... that all papers found, there .cidut cungoe k;go ... r4s should be ,breivgbtfoiwird, tO pnipicity, without any other - reistist-io suspect that k afiy papers wme aCtuallY there4elatiog bett -Whie ; some thiiisght kopet to eet*idgeant,:. Alle-cisefriste pretvnlcd by L0ett..91ka . 410 . 04t,...i • wnrreurato \IAII / 4 ttikid..ritsOoo;io:..l34 diquiter; • It - mbikig..e . pop hoald. le I:earned most Ai( tlentao, 'hi i . • e . • 4 • '.; • • • . • * I . _ . 14 6 ° inns crew ms. But if eit. .ft paper did egisti and (1. nji s . that the . House should dctermiee not 46 - j ean the di ~ for that paper, they _would k iosilttunpr4.oated. ..satnel ilud. 1 situation ; they would be pursuing an 441141, and had li 'hey, at the; sanietinNrefusing to call forts t Uri) , kne* ,to the heat not but might prore.themost imp lent document the r OW 4/ 4 "ii. - 4.41.-•4.•• • • jg . befor -Gent p ot , them: — Lord Chatham— ' • 01 hi) ifolTd et Lrtederstuod tu ... ...i.p01.: with,al Ouse sentitnee* the L le - ri t l a personal and regard that were dee - tri 1 1,1 * 4 __ _ • _ _ . _ • .. . • • that noble person, from all those who knew him, sent who knew how to appreciate the exalted qua, lities of his late illuatrious relative.... Lord Chatham was a Cabinet blitiisler , Which - was resolvable into this, that ho was a Privy Counsellor, en. trusted with a high and reaponsible.place in. hik Majesty's Councils and Government, ; ill such he did '1,4 tneao to invade his official prero,gative, or • question iiis high privileges ; but, if lie. mistook not, lie was right in sayin4 that after L•ird Chatham had accepted the coagulant/ of the army and the conduct of the Expedition; be t from that dine, became as responsible to his Majesty's Go. moment and Oh: Cuaotry, as any soldier taken from the army, and .eletated to that important trust. [llcar, hear!] Theo, if this vi as, as he took it to be, utideetiable ; he could not sec up on what principle that Noble Lord, or any other person entrusted with such a command, had a right to cut Out fur himself and his peculiar repro. sentations, a Royal road to the King's audience, Hear !] 110 was, no doubt, responsible to The King ; but that responsibility ought to here been addressed through the regular and ordinary 'than. tied. • [Hear!] The Right llenourahle Gentle. -mail next adverted to the Sign Manual. lie said that it had been alleged that Lord Chatham, by virtue of tin', Sign Manual, had been invested with certain extraordinary privileges; this was a mis. take : the Sign Manual was made rise of in granting Conimissimis to Foreign MiOistere; ancl:Governors of Colonies ; but it was always directed, as in the case of Lord Chatham, nest those . occoviiis of their ewspect.Oe d Mies should bc i for (Ili Majesty throngh the customary [Alioor 6f one of tits t"rtnet palSeeretaries. But it aptioareti that nonarratisehad been calledlor,-and thattord Chatham without be. ing asked had volutitarily'given itr one. Another point for cousidengtion that- which arose out of this principle:: The King- did nothing without an Agfristft.' Rut it appeared that the paper .con. taining Lord Chatham's narrative, being. in its coi -1 giWal form unofficial; was SUbSegllelltly magle!offi. ciat,. his Majesty, having required, that it 'Wald be handed trreriu hil Principalriocretaty,of . Stare., —Here' then the douse e might. tot,-wh o aitrispi tire King to snake' that paper Offitiiil. necessarily must have advised it, and the Chief ^kid of this observati • I, if it had any, . was, Ant the person who advised the King to make the former paper official, might also make that other, if there nal any such other, official. And ',this brought , him to that other part of the question., that of the etistenee •of the piper ii. question. — Ile confdssed that in this vie* he was not at all influenced as, to the vole lie Should gl6e ; far, as he had already stitti;4l, he thought that whether the paper was idexisteoce or .Igot .leaivinunaterk4,to the question. of the; nectssity the 11.961°. stns 'ialwird uttego 4f cAlrirttlipiri citcu:n. • . ‘' • .• haa.:119•,A1.1-. - I -. Learned t.. ,c44l4.canqpie which were apr &loaning to speech, .thera afford no argum sitiun he submit (erect priaci, laid down, not _ . but by others, who came to km opposite sion, from w hich he could not accept atC,arg . meat in favour of his motion, although be mice, be glal of any Gentleman's vote, whatever grousdi he selected. Now, as to the speech of the EtiOt lionourable Gentleman on the floor (Mr. .Can.., nine), he confessed that he heard it with &light', not only because it was the first time that he had ever happened to experience the support of ttfit. Right Honourable Gentleman, but also becauie • the speech itself was Marked by all that pc. cut* character of. reasoning and ability of statement which belonged to that Right Ho, oottrable Gentleman. It was, however, five , from those sallies of wit and humour which were wont to excite such pleasure among the Gentlemen who occupied the Ministerial Benches, But the Right Honourable Gentleman had no reason to regret the silence with which his spet ch was heard'. ile was not so loudly and liberally cheered to night ; but sure he was, the . Right lion. Gentleman had never deliverell a speech which his old ft ienrls so st rongly, perhaps so severely,felt. With the doc trines which the Right nom Gentletrian had laid down asthe basis of his proposed.yote,hc conylete. ly cutlets . reed ; and as the .Right Hun. .Gentlemp would lie soon called tintwto answer:for litetiselcit. ....t o to ho wiLlied thatsfor would be 'Ole to , recon. rile his conduct. to l ose ductripes..• There. srtkro many subtleties sophistniadvanend by Gentle. men on the otidr side, which le did nut think it nreessary ta-iimice ' as they bad been already. o ably expty6d and refuted by the Right Honouretve G wr - ion don non the lower beech:.(-Mr ! *Bathurst), folly competent Oahe task. ...But had fallen from the Hon. Officer an the other s' c (Genes! Loftus),. awn). which he could not :forbear to remark'... ,Thst .illonourahle Officer, the professed •advocate, the „acknowledged friend 4 ,f Lord ch i athaoh, bad stated, that ,the Neale . Lord's narrative fiat, prevented in p)ntegtocited of the letter written by !Sir R. Striebitls on tea r47th of August laSt • What the% LoW4,,liiith - tirt had so lobe fosteted his auger : 44o's° many months, the spirit. -of , temp veukaii!edi vdtts mode repeftnra, and suddenly I seat , forth upon its object. Although the latcr it Richard Straelttn contained such saternot. as demanded• ; ttithuttg4 it .sonenseilkatql_ . .,l 6 o ll4 "nos don as would hs'ypiottomptidody-ldiniipa's intent tion immediateli,to initeire, Loyd,chatham was M , 'Ali and Ciotti tribe Minister, ; • bistpt litissuisetthje it eath ) 'and kik it warm uhtil.6irliterl. l lltrachan •• A • •• • ; 't!` • - J rot t • ~.,. • ' • ' I I , . TMEAD-reli;;*itt . ..hiPip l4 .4o - ..* s . lo be eetletted with. tht . n ilion ,4f . . t• was yet ; nee#4ry , for ini t,o,itter, . . *is . iiii-ohserlelions 411'' ~ thillopan. • oppeiiitien to his. .ni . 11,- 114 All 1 : 1 i Kt•Genticni49. whit..ape, .e. , 1eit;•0,1%1 :"? :s . ' 1 kere, .:unfeigued .reveot for: that ~ • : •-• he. woeld'paps him orirvery:l* 1i1ty . ... ;••••6, • ,--.!' 4 ::-..: Gaiitleinan. e• a* ill $lll' , E 44 9 11 - . tvie generis,/4ut .those.sui, gesterif v : , ~..e ! :;..:, • pplicatkie to hi s niotione . liek.frorni a • •,..,......-%,.. -:-. the end of the Learned Gentleme n ; ' "::..:. ..i. s were grounds staled M •*A COI . I •d . - '1..: •-•••:. . • s lament. either foc or against thtproi)e.. ' . '..e•f r , •-• mittcd ) width rested upent *kite slif.:: • :..:.., inks. Theretwere t indoid, grpneqe . ' • ...:•,,,,7 et only by the I:earned Gentlemen, ,-•-• • ',. . . .•. : • .' • ,te; cellor • NPR 1 . :1 BAH the not . Icta-