The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-06-23 00:00:00

~. Worre;tee bile 4 peciahle; were still annoy Wow& He found in looking over the papers. that Lord Londonderry and Lord Castlereagh had I proposed to postpone their own inteiests, in order that the provision for the younger children might be I secarred to the amount of 80.0001.—With Teepee! to Jr. y.trinpeses property, it appeared in he erre thospirnod four hundred pouted. a year, in Ire. 1;4, vrres to her English property, its !value its oir'e litace dePended upon collieries, one of which wag he 4 under a lease from the Dean aod Chapter of Tiurnern, which woolci 'spire in abornt eight years, , Eno it was ouderstood there was a Coll Sider• stile dillicuilY time . the subject of renewing.-: She had, however, independent ,e( that, a very ceet t iclorahle fortune, but teach less than the ii,ofilar heat given her credit for, es it bad happen ed io her, as to many others, that thq world sup- Willed her to be three times as rich as she really was. should not enter into en esaminatiott of the rea stilling in the Master's report, as to 'lie advantage of a young Lady having* kqbend of mature age. His Lordahip considered the objection of the disparity of eft bad totally Clited, hut for his own pert he could sec thkrth disparity of age was any recommendation. IS wok ,poitst which it was the duty of the hinds of the Lady to represent to bet. 'Although it did not !Wlma, that because a man was 40 years. of age, that be i was theteforts of mature judgment, yet it seemed a 11,4 inference of the matter that Lord Stewart hat. jog spent hi. if. in the attainment of every honour th4t every country in errors.. could corder on him, Wag entitled to he looked upon as a person who had well cohducted himself, and es a man of sound iod i c. i t tient and high character. With, respect to Lurd S;eaart's having a son who might intercept the bo. I saws of the family, if ibiswas a eartiass est which tire affections of she Lady were engag e d„,iag,he to say, merely because her son could not have a British Veerege, that therefore it was an improper marriage The nest charge, was that of Lord Stewart having no adeqoate fortune:bet, on this point he felt. himsej( bound to refer to a cast in which Lord Thurlom 'hod, derided against a marriage, on 'the ground ,of Opacity of fortune, though the Master hail repotteekin %ester of the maniage. The opinion of Lord : Theriatichad been coorBrmcl, on appeal to the House of Vordp..4- That cite, differd widely from the present one: there the peteswi t arho had proposed, the marriage hid only 5001 P a ar illowid him by his father, three bandied , • yoj pesnd- a ,yrrer . ss Rouser of e Park, 1001. year its his wart right. Another rase was that, of Lord Carteret, oho, harl.paid his addresses to Miss Watson. lord Carteret was a man of rent', but of no fortune.—_ Lord Thorlow's mind bad long vacillated upon tba,t eataSii;ii, as indeed was said to be the case with the preaent Chancellor, but at last, tensible that the egectioris of, the young people were too closely DO. 41 to be seated, he had consented to the mar. rose. In the present case there was rants, fortune, he, hoped cberscter, and very great connections. The. I.ody had a fortune *goal to a provision fur trey fa tuity, therefore neither the authority of the cases tint!, nor a ju4 view of the subject, led him to think there was any disparity in point of ((Weep, particularly when it was considered that. Lord Stew art had purposed to make sus h settlement as .the Court should think proper. This proposal hiving Leers carried before the Master, Mrs. Taylor had of f fetid Isor,,ohjections : they consisted of, a refotation of all * gaiements in the affidavits ; she objected to, him as s suitor to her niece on accuant of his age, cheracter..lite situation of his property, and other circumstances stated with regard to hiefarnilyr She, ropresented his age at forty, that ofher neice's at Is, and added, that after the most diligent enquiry, she felt herself coatpelled to repeat, that she believed his dispor s •itimp opd habits were dissipated and irregular, end ill-seited to promote the. happiness of domestic life. The nest and. most painful task was, as 'elated • tothechorecter of Lord &smart. Upon that most, diarresoiog part of SIMI,CaS., he Mrs. Taylor cre. dirt for her . cotttictioo4 that the representation made. to het. saaltree, hes$114:01•41400 11110, hew he could act upon. such a state .of,thitsgs according try the dutie; of the erasion heheld,lostin aalfret Aso lb. Fborite of dissipation, Lord ,Stewaridiad pledged liimtelf by his oath several limes, that hit, habits of life had not been dissipated. or . irreestlat,aottited.exprested the headship of suck general imputations in ,an affidavit, its w hich be had ehallensed the whole world.to slate a single 40 on which tech. an assertion .could he coosidered as well founded.: If it wits meant to make any charge against the. moral character .of fiord 6teirett, it ought to half been- dilltieCti.Y pet- He ovg.l.t to kno w what, were the.habits of life, which. had betto.refersert to as furnishing: evidence of disci. patios, Row could he say whWther Mist -habits were . illreuited 40 ; promete the happinescof f doevestio without lusowing what wale those habits? Thejelia. diction he exercised w (mid he moat erne!, if he Suffer. ed any cam o's character tn.'se attacked by anonymous, ititestrotes,,without an opportunity being given to the patty to refute their easertions.. It appeared to him, that, he could not, as a just man, a father, or a Ju;lge l „ act upon the objection as to character. The treat objection was of a nature which expose the Court to a great deal of difficulty,.but it: was the duty of the Court fully toconaider it. Tboae who kisew Lord qteoart's family., knew it was very numerous and very reapectahle. The only. instances brought for. ward as proofs of hereditary insanity were two ; and what did they.amonnt la It appeared that the mired • of Lady Caroline Wood, by tnismassagententin child. bed, and afterwards-by bathing in the nee, had be come ern wed ; betthis was only a temporary allbc• roe. God forbid he should it take as evidence of an hereditary faint • that it . was only temporary, he must conclude, for this.reaser, that the medical men bad spoken in a way which left-it impossible todoubt the fact. The only other instance, was that of Lady Londonderry, in 1782, at ohiels• period the ear Stated to have been deranged. ilex milady. bad beam accounted for mei:My in the same moaner. Hii Lordship said, he had gone email, adkeil of the circumstances waives ItOthae-proposals of'snar-1 tinge. Sir Samuel Kornilly4, for obese judgment aril 140)er, a man, a fsitar, and ti • Judge, PO -anal had higher respect, asid e do whosit4opinims he.(LorilS Chancellor would pis much deference as be *mold to that . of any man 10In had titer hereof that Hes, fie mein could he trctuitad by cberiee eistortmetiotafi ;orioles, had asked how he tadlEbsct Isaiah*/ 1 • rept), he would say, he wisuldtkhavr , onmebedr ;tt'u thesase exactly the sante way, brat 1,44,114041, • lavit - ricintrea - Viii tribleice in the case. camstances, howevei, in which Lady Aril Placed, were ,pmewhat different. Ile lore tranractions of the spring of Itstu, Certainly they bid a considerable effect on his yield whet) ht was considering what value was due to the consent ef • Lady Antrim. Mrs. Tay. 11;r - h'ad stated. that the whole was a plan to get cossession of the fortune of the lady, and further the irobitiois views of one of the perlieq. These un.. dpubtedly were circumstances which it would be es.' li!ine'ly di ffi cult for lady Antrim to g..t over; but ts 'far 'as Lord Stewart was concerned, there wife pinhiOg improper imputable to him. Ile was, how. lTer, of oftiosiort that Lord Stesert would have acted etter if he had not made Ms ;dorsal o f marriage sq ermined as he had done. lie thought he should have ermined Mrs. Taylor of his intentions hafore he had proceeded to carry them into effret. This was th e general view he had taken of the rase, hot there Were still some points upon which he wished to avail himself of a few h ours further consideration, as to whe• the( he should meke ordirect further euquirt . Whether he should take that course or hoot, he should think it his duty to ewe,- to Lady Tempest herself, all the objections which had been urged agaittpt the marriage —he should with all the force he was stile, call vote her to consider those ottjectioits, and sho u ld t w o , estimate what was due to a consideration to vs i.ich much - was due—he meant, what were her iireiirrstirmir oft the settled. %lb that duty he should chore himself, and he would acquit himself of it without farour or iffection, irAl with that impartialitx which tlonged to an honest Judge, and a maw, who re.. r e t liected that he;lrail it Gigs dives,' the hapttiness in individual of wham ike could trol,y say. the s t did not believe there was a mote deserving isatl.,4oll in the world. With thew fept iv o s o te 'lthould have the satisfactitm of ki t oW i t t 4 that hie j i phg. liTerst could be set right. lie tow:tell no on* smolt, there him with wilful emu. lie would let Ike ,Parties know, to.ruorrow or Wednesday, as hek.lre should do with teferet , ce to those l • is up whisk hel 'hail reserved his final opinion. The case of'cuurse stand. over tilt to.morraw tx Wedniadoy. • .± COURT QF, KtlY9'l4 BEN cg, 4uNg.4s. LI 13P.L. • • TOLLAND V CLEINENT. This was en action saeinst the Defendent, as pro. prietor of the Observer. Sunday New spoiler, for print. ling and publishing on Sunday, the 27,11, of April, 1817, a libel of and concerning the Plaintiff, put. .porting to hr an 'tycoon of the prOcredings of the Instils...it Det•tose- Court, in a MO wherein the Plaintiff, as insweril,4 the 1.,:er1 . of Morley, appeared to oppose the discharge of a mass named Curnsell, an insolvent debtor, whip had been charged in execu tion at the suit of the. Noble Lord for rent due to him for a farm, of which Curseell had been tenant. — The Defendant pleaded, first not guilty, and second. ly, that the publication in question aan orfejr 'and. correct account Of what took place on thcoccerien. Mr. ScAaLaTT »Wed the case to the Jury, and re capitulated the circumstances which gave rise to the proceedings in the Insolvent Demote Court, the re. port of ehich formed the subject of the libel. The lissolarn; t unmet!, had been tenant to Lord. Slor: ley of a fatal, and having become indebted for real;' the Plaintiff, as the Nottle Lord's steward, distrained upon the tenant's fat mill utetisits sod other property, sahich sere found inauthcient to pay the amount of the distress, in consequence* of. his having (as was ialleged) contrived to remove away some of the pro. pray, so as to defeat she proce.s. Some time after this. Curswell was arrested, arid having given omit', of his intention of tskiss the benefit of the Insolvent Debtors' Art, et the Devonshire Quarter Se‘siotta, the Pleietiff appeared at those Sessions, to oppolc itls discharge, and after the, case had been fully heard, the Sessions . remanded Curswell, on the ground s( fraud. u and:couceeltnent of his • eff.cts Auer belere reesandrd begot hail, and rain« up to Lotads.ll, lad wag then lodged in the King's Bench. icione, and al the expiration of three months he . g i tive the suesl notick of his intentiok,of tilting the beilefiai of: the Act before Mr. fitiVjeant Ruoitieglonv oat. theft occasion the,Plaint l ilriippritired units to Ili-' post his discharge, on the ground, of his foresee re. mind by the Quarter Sessions: The Counsel. for Lord Morley ass Mr. Bassett, and Mr. Heath ape peered for the insolvent. On.the following Sunday a statement appearetkin the Defendant's paper, which purported to be an limning o(ahe proceedings before Mr..Serjeent Runnington, but which was alleged to he an inaccurate .account' of -what really pasted. The publication in quessiolt wholly omitted what eppesred favourable to the Plaintiff; it exaggerated what was pravad, and stated what never had ap peared in evidence, or . had • been uttered by the Counsel in the case: It, was contended that the character .of Oka ,Piaintik . was implic..ted in, this publication, inesmechas-it..taincled- to-show that he heed acted with the grosaeat oppression aod cruelty Beards the insolvent. The principal inaccuracies relied upon, were statements professed to have been . made by Mr. Heath, who acted as Counsel for the insolvent. After the formal proofs were gone through of the introductory matter of the declaration. Mi: Boyce and Mr. Hughes, who were profess 4mi:illy employed in the opposition of the lsisolventi proved . that the publiCation in question . was not an , accerate account of the proceedings of the Insolvent Debtors' Court in the case in question, and they weiked out - the particulars in which it was a depts. ! Ore frOni )ccuracy. Mr..OustegY, for the. Defendant, addressed the Jury at censiderable length,. and slated that he aboald De *able to, prove that the publication in question was not only in substance, but to the very I letter, correct in ester/ particular. Edward :fulrou9da, a ,person occasionally ems• ployed by the Defeedent, aimed, that . he had re ported the f aseiti question,,and At wet .in subetence c o rrect. Ile swore to the accuracy of the pertiCuler pain get Ojetted to on the part,er the Plaititiff. On, 404 crnss-eterninetion„ hQ•eviir. his "drained ,that he . had seen Nip. Heath'', brief. it. Ornirl o bel,,` , 'flied that be had Wink. it„kpaiT, will e . ihielit..jit fend 1 1 l the brief :itt Catart,alter { Hi t e. case was.exer. i ~ is! de, hillt! thethe.l l oj4 At'il l itif tAlisell *AI!, ironed' give. the Plaiutifte 4 - theceitig t its bitoggeseit,,o(.4l4l, .proceedings.!, • ..) - t; a J sat ad lbw (v - 4...rlyvvn 'A ' ) it rl a ;.nci HE S'rATESNIAN. e cast. The fir: . :11irAriftie it.'nery, aw agent ;remit A dy Antrim was 'Amid Debtors' Coust, deposed tp tl He could me Ow vetoer/ in question, hut on hii era ing of 1816, and ho orealsitrObit he had banded Mr. H , 1 Ibid. effeci on his Mi. liblitiml4,•aad did nok lecei we it b /6A Mr: Edmunds.' alp_ , it . back him for a week. Mr. Bruen, the Barrister, 'wing call. .that he certainly did not eventide,. the ',stamen , question as a faithful report of the proceirdiuss foie the Insolent Court, and pointed particuhrs in which it wits inaccurate; ha I %bull) omitted the ezatt•ination in chief of. the Insolvent, and ascribed observations to Mr. Heath, which hid net been uttered bt that Learned Counsel. Mr. SCARLET? *as heard in reply, and contended that the ease proved on the part of the Defendant, was an aggravation instead of a mitigation of the in. jut' iv., of which the Plaintif f had to complain. Lord Et.wittoitcruow charged the Jury, that the altvrapted. to be made our, bad fallen under the Defendant. it was not sufficient to shwa, that the repots 41 substantially erwrect ;it Inuit he skewn that it was correct to the eery better. The Plaintiff s4a rinartir entitled to a verdict, but it was tor` SUM to racy 411W1t Pititoonahte recompence the ileintiff was entitled to t ender aft the dreentstanted pf Ibe. eta,. after about live miner,' conaideration t rosiest it diet for the Plaintiff—M=oi Mt. BANK OF ENGLAND. V. 'WARWICK. • This we, a rase of the utmost importesee to the Petiole, et it respects the power assumed by lie Web' of 'omb's!), of impoundiug Bauk Nodes sapposed M. en N erir..Lt was an action by a respects*. paws hrr•ker resitting in llolbern, against the Dellecadent, an totpr;dilit 'of bank Notes to the Bank of England c for. falsell, maliciously, and tinhorn( any reasonable or pr.obeble cause, charging the Plaintiff with feloi niornsly having in his possessioa a certgin falsiteed, forged Bank of England Note for the payment of ONO pound, whereby the Plaintiff was itnpriseefd for the specenf 24 hours ips. _:s. The case of the Plaintiff was conducted by Mr. SCARLET; Mr. thioDRRICY, a • nd Mr. CUMIN': The case opened 'on the part of the Plainiillt •Wes . this :—On the 28th of Dec., 18160 he Deist.: came to the Plaintil'a Shop, and produced a faroi l .". Bank Note, and asked him if he knew any thing n . it ? The Plaintiff immediately recognised it as one,: which hefted received in tbe Course of hisbirsitiem from a ! mine named Gaubold, and had passed 'away to a Mrs. Bull. lie gave every information in Ills pokiii upon the subject, arid offered to go with the Defsind• ant to the different persons, through whose hatitli,it had passed. The -Defendant accompanied him to Mrs. Boil, to whom the Plaintiff gave another note in lieu, and she also gave every information upon the subject - and upon their return to the Pills4oN shop, the Defendant insisted upon the former giving up the note, hot he peremptorily refused,, siying, , that he should keep it for the purpose ortracing it: The Defendant thee:said, that if the note was not de. *livered up, he shouf4apply to i M agist rate attff Charge I him with a felony ; but - the Plaintiff still persistedlit keeping possession of the note. The Defendant went. away, and in the course of the:evening, the Plaintiff 'received a summons to' appear before Mr. Baker, the `Magistrate of Hatton-garden Office, the nest morn ing, to answer to a charge of felony. Neat morning, he accordingly appeared, and upon the investigation of the cos., he was committed by the Mlgiatrattio Clerkenwell Prison on a charge of felony, bat . ilie neat, day was liberated, the Plaintiff conainti;?‘..to eagle the note in Mr. Baker's hands, to be forth. ming when rolled for. The Magistrate had differ eal to / admit the Plaintiff to bait, bat he perempiiirili refused to compromiae. the matter in thetwah, and ifisitteil upon going to prison, if' the. Iliagistrete .thoeght his duly Sited upeb him to prieliod to that eatiesnity. No proceedis . were aftersinids taken hgairtst the Plaintiff, an d the . present action was, brought bi.bios to recuier damages for fei n te lova aptiment. • , Al4l • , TA'S' n Lord F. i On the opening o Asset, ...minsditeuratt jetimated .a clear opinion, shit the Defend* lied hcled erroneously, and strongly, recommendistiliet Pie Plaintiff' should hive *verdict with morning de mom's, in order to avoid a discussion, which might be attended, with unpleasant consequences to the Birk of England. •.: .! Mr: tcattt.Fer expressed ids rowlinesi to seqeierce In titit suegestion, but „•, I Mr. TOPPING , with whites were Mr. GURRE; and Mr.Serjeana Bossenpre, expressed his.determirta. Hon to go through with like case, 'natio& that the _ whole ofthi facts. were not disclosed. ' fireicaoso -Aro proceeded, but the facts were in no degree Ceded by the evidence called, The wit. 'Donn toicnined were, John Bennett, the Rain tiff's shopman; Mrs. Ball, one of the persons through whose hands the note bid passed; and 8,. Baker, &q. the Magistrate. Lard ELLEttsonouuu, in the course of the cause repeatedly intimated his opinion, that there watt-wo, pretence for the conduct observed towards the !VIM. 4., .tiff. His Lordship on one occasion said; " I rk sole question seems here to be, whether we are to assert the rights and liberties of the People, rattler than that a clerk of the Bank should be foued,so be in the wrong."—On another occasion, his Lordsitipsaid,. " I think she commitment in this case is unfp n uoded is, law, and the mats who urges a commitment i n sider the circumstances of this case, is crassa igitorentlia, and that is malice." Both of these observations producett involuntary bursts of applause from the spectators. William Bee6y, assistant jailer st Cleckeewell Prison, proved that the Plaintiff was confined Jolliet' prison from five o'clock in the efternOo6 of abe da,y atoll one o'clock AO neat day. Mr. Tarring eaves sed the Jory with coneMereble ability upon the question, whether there waVan t yp're. tence, for saying that, the Defendant had in tbirrnie, ec red' gn aligi ous ty and Without'any probable minis ? .fit contended, that as the Defendant hati Acted 1141 1 1 the advice. of Magistrate Ito iika l oot aintliteiidlli Ptif the coeseq?eocia. ~- .i , . , , , y , ft e _. 6 . . 4 tt ; . 414 *" 11 , 1 1441 1 1 9 *lO i t #: ll ! i' laLtgt7 restere i r the sopitiviam sts . ' 'noel) , ispri n ; b; ,ifesitcneal them : egaitSt giving iutem*Fte ri vi COO ftenureli ~ i . the „fih,,aft air . .1 4 'ra edroloiee coneidersiliii .444' • •C .: .1... • ..e. ..rutil i iir • . . , 1 for tbe Plawitsf—mitilegee . .15 . L 4 tsj 4 :I t t •,!... ~. 'me pvidi, , 4 amp. . . 39111 Dote, IMeasielliffik.4,4llfrisfie lad Ili lialtildietat, tall Fuel, 4 .04/ 1 . 1184110 s Osoki4v4 vienit*Qm Master. air e .. olter. , *reign 11..0jimule Lloyd Mr* ophresr-Ilaser, viNeelli,' Freida 1V nite wzigiat, wing !else, jp! lg' i e bo mmta g k -- 7r, -• nelllN AA rout. 4id Dias, Edward Getage_b,thslo . Kestrel, (erd. Nbe t e . s ip, by purchase, v.re tellesSMl, appoint e d to die 6)4414 bath clime. Caftans Junin tdshonsibe, teem the isttlf-pnyig. k ,td thirrivon &twilit) ln tie floirtatio,of a Cestopaoy, ek t i Onsienall, why Pedlars. p 61a MN, Lietstehast Monett Redd, Ina the half.paa, i; '36lu Eons, to be Lieuteuttut, widoot purchase, e k e . -"" appointed to tbelid liritlatalrl. , t 15411. Dino, Lieutenaut Cornelius Cityler Philip Mak, b ee* h a lt:pay of the 7th root, to be Lientestintot ice Swirl Mae %hob *4444aosms, receklecgte ildintiman. ft 6511‘ Mao, tawitu Arnow Lr*stloynt free °he 49d n 0444 MAO,' Wilhult porettise. like Donald, deemed. I 794 ppm), Captain Henry Seesesset, fate the haW.p dss is Ill bo its Pats, to be Captain of a Company, vice Whiteford Bey,. *schnaps. 84th Ditto, Lteotesant'Johs Dale is be Captain of a Ca l m. sidsone longbow ' 'kr Oak; deceased, r--/s • Ensign Thus' Andreas la he Liessesion,triee#4 4 Herbert Vaughan, Gent. t . be Fangs, "lee Andrews. Had Via., Jobs Poisoned. tiros. to be 'Win, 1 , 1 * claw eke Wo di, promoted. , ~ ' "Ice tall*, fk. 4* West Lull Regiment, James Gillett; Gist In he it akar* , nice Drasunv. appaimed to the . Wat . Royal Wee * migerd. task* PlearY VP I , IOO , frostio Wee ... 1.. 3 ,.: 4th Weil • ceased. Atea h7E: t lCdt " L be ST Ealli ft FF. III - It llospital-Assistant Joseph Huey, from the half-pay, i s b Hospital Aadstasit to the Fortes. ' MEMORANDUM. The name of the Gentleman appointed to the Corneal left 12.4 Light Dragoons, on the .N. d April. lam, should be Jas. Haydock lia)tiock, and out Joseph Haydnek lioardotat Its:. desk. 'lice name of the Gemini's's. appointed to fail-pay in Neal Regiment. is Graeae, and not Lifetime, as stated in the Gurus el( use lath lantaa., Commission in IMe bleat Vigil MRltia,signed by she Geverni t t, Captain-General, and Vice.elkdioiral of the Isle of %iglu. William Watkio Aow3l, /in. to be Captaiu-Commaadoot, vice Veletas', dreamed. • Commimion in the let Regiment of Royal Tower Hamlets Dili. sla, signed by the Dept.ty Lientasmohlat the Tower Hamlet.; ip the pawner of the Lord Lima 4 ,, James dellet,kpq. to be Copious o a y, vice %Vood, oohed. • OLD BAILEY. MONDAY, Jim ft Mary Knight was convicted of riveivieg a trotter key, principal was convicted last Sestinas. Wm. Wright was indicted capitally for privately wean* pair of breeches, value Its. the property of linoleum Worm, a , her shop. Guilty—Death. John Fitzgerald and John Mils were capitally 'aided Air a:Psuultiug George Davis on the King's highway, and taking • from hi. ' Jerson three gold seals and a silver saint, his pianist; 'Dar Prisoner .zgeruld is u.deaf and dumb Milk madam. persons from the Deaf and Dumb Asylum atteuded, for the_ pal pated listerpratiug the evideace. but nei t h e r of theta aolleya. definite tuctiniey the depositions accurately to him. His trial was in consequence postponed until Wedoeulay lambing. UAW* tiocava was capitally indicted fur steal* iti the dad. ling-house of James Gough, a silver collie-put, value 101. hit 'property. tilailey OUTING AtiatillAlMlNG. Wen. Gott. a bob . only elevisselisars silage, was capital) 1)o. dieted for wand!). •and walkaway cutting and stabbinki r, Y. astia, , with, Aiwa( tu icitl biah.os do him w.e "Wilms initial bona. It .appeared that she Prisoner mod • Watt, eati bee* gansisliav tWid Watts would not gamble .ay more; he (the Primal/al t .eN marew a stone at him. and Waits then gat a lay to bald bib i• labile he ( Wutin) haat 11151). 11lbr hegged Mos *hot oeined..Han 'Dugan might be called t he was accordingly siabd that they : II tos.ino f.r halfpence. but when do itn• - owe, he would not tam. aoy inure g out on his stating lam he ousts 'dab him, Watts made moot er tiny take hold of biro while* (*.Whim. and distandsately he got (toot his grasp, the Prameto: ran after Waus and stabbed hien. Mr. Jeuice Allier, inn spun dint by she evidence, Owned; that in axioms* highly Pe"' as the would be of opiaiou that the ?simmer w..i assaul.ed before preseat, peril/tab theJtig .lisabbed Waite. .411' The Jury wus• of this opialosi M wootmaced the 144 Guilty. hamiaa &NAT cautioned .hie ho overa his ponies is • f)))use, at of all things to avoid gambling no a Suntlay i n it if OinAseC ultimately lead to the eat daiagelesese wee. ~;~ Exscursini., 4 ' • "nifffrirh*ft f • On Monday .1. Dennett, the Ws/edible and decrepid oltirosk, who was convicted on Friday thf the wilful murder of Aar . Rogers, was executed at the 014 purratineeld kit Sentence. /le seemed much agitated when he node wilt.* scaffold. to which he was obliged to be tiopoortris AstiMe. nued to tremble violently mold he was turned 011. when hi hands clasped together. and •he seemed to dub foam the idsh struggle. After hangingthe amid time. h 1 body ,was over to the sitrgemrs tor dissection. The eseconouer . was prt •ented, by order of the Sherif. from rubbing the bawds of i deceased to pert.ous aMicted with liens &c. Sir Geroge Aide soyf had spoken to Mr. asrpue and • Geiser .Medicaltiendesteas upon the subject of the advantage attributed .8 the raptorial, and having learned that none could possibly arise, gass.4re ardent above alluded to for the sake of p..blie decency. IP Sunday night the sacrament was. administeted to bum, sod' a 'timber of hi, friends tame io late leave. He tretrierd'ilie Members of his family oho signed Lim, that be was. pet prepared to leave the a °rid. and that the only eh OA) , he be was coined h' the delay. K hen the verdict of guilty ass re!. . nounced in the Court, he tolled to the hostiand di thitleitatiedc aid taking him by the begged his toigivestess. bet. at the,sgme time, mid, " you yourself, knees, will tweet sal the stitie - tior." This peogimitit. coadar .. it did from 44 'gentile brink of eiernhy, produced a violent effec4 upon de person to whom it was addrened t and Although she slikaitioill Ihe words was diferent from what bad been apprehended by Hoge", ,his 41 1 / 4 1111 washy ma astmar.t dionitishe, l when rltc iin tended meaning was comsnimitated to him. Itogeridread 110 violence, of isdividuals..aosi hocked litasselit : op. , hot I.)erletr'' meant ti.e violence of the law. " ltugers, ' said he. " man of a passioadMiteMPery 11111dok he outy - stral sue{ I ND going: la suffer,. fur wbotbe sioy44o. des" 1 . , Co'lt'4l WS hiIQ6ERT. 3 I Monday en Leine* wansekearin doer body .1 at Jane MOW of Mite-mm u, Gray's Isis. law, 'siren it appeared dab gle ,c ceased had on Saturday drank 34 haltatearterits. of gin at ferent drata.shops. and that, epost-opening h'( body, ker was disoawaretk to km horn atuttptatly vomited by driskialle" . Vardict,—" Died in a at of intosteatusa.a.. 110:1). On the 15th lr,,tant in Ruabarren village, Dutufriesibire, WII• • 11 41 old Chelsea. pensioner. Hy his null uremia' tie was one biondred and eight yllttis of sage, having het a 404 is the year lit° His. dioaletriar.‘ !louvre, winch is skied bit ' 1703, ood characterises him 14 , bring ib a " von 0 0 service, mikes him n feir ieeris young r, hut still "1/ 112 .` 1 ,..' Tr hundred. Ile enlisted, when young, its the honwliml,ed" Tr hurl served Ihet ierfwau *SP. trader Lord S4air.At 'the Yeafs:l74:l 4. Uat thet•eakiat oat of she Keb his 4 W watt; Irt• sk.ed a stand of caktun , frail hitb the i hand..t die and sunk ih in otb 4v 4:o4..Aeltistrdlinei: who ,tr . then rye.- kited hi* &Milli sit.W . it ' l' ai retfOtiett •,a- a bloc.. at a link t;illejoir mined in *silk about me acitibboarbiod fill %titbit' tea . tot trkd.seub • . - FT Tlll7 l r • • 04 4 II ntlfl • Pstottl, Alf lo .i 3; P 114114Sree. Sr litSillai4* • . • -•• • . ~.~~~~ • .; ~,~ << To the WOI r ". Grovel 'IIH E*o Liar. 164PREIti et Eiwiwz rip ow • *lrvin* , State or ie !tier be illy gocedtetict pricitexesi Objects cf . . . • - ..tY 4 A VOWS! *J4.141.A.;•;hj • ra 4011 • - Opurn T HE aloe esentaii Rio las itAtaciall bat .10‘00411 ,4 keffiAgf reting.t meg um« Rit g* tbeft• alp*, *id tikvitior 4e trie 1 bll • '10% 3 U 1"r 1•7•1 GENT' r1;1 WWI epeewril lavolud - 41 Tort labs Miiatber 14 1 9 41114 ASPOIaI' mama he Zeirerys , • -liiemits 1 Mr. Aid. !Lab. Wai ' To the W . •• • 10.111 • Aa ' a erlil 'Posh[ lo appear in • crab. lin bible tam ~atal 'Ma* COSit OAS, In pram have beta auwortb) aWn profl tile Inhtobi tel be my ' rivet* hope, any 'Mal! pen . the taw 'admire regarded, disiingaib Thelnl called al 'WNW a , ' apectabil found ail I can teadance, eppoaem maintain Cumin Idamel •Akseigy • the 'THI of trfoinsio takes to ' Poll, *1 • la sent I she Moo exercise to (boo Richard Now 10 3/1 ~. .~ ... ..; . s -4111 1 1 1 1 1. 111 . 1 . 11 111111114* in ill* . 111- tittle r 412 lAA "iN -404,4Tritresiloa ccui4/ MILITARY PROltel" apr"'"' -dais° ..go admit ion • les brief to it spin from war-01. Asa 0. sd R mimed! of Drag..oos. uet ClClark, Plan*. ti t ic kat pat the MI Lep rogboat: bethitseid. Iled. /toted, yitt' s aziliwtf ilki i ""l oril i tiot w " 6 , - 11 - 11 ig' 4ll , ll4ll ° .° 44 7:47 ,4 76. t 0t it moment in ode.pZy ►44 . rwm., ""rima su z i aL e r t,,mbl v amott msdinos be. Amable,ll4 o PLeolt Sachanaest rectividdie da tfvett. s onsaggi out se‘er _, nib bittu. nolo Ponta 6.61 Lieottoibt, wi nds , pp Mope. • • tht rspfirt I.leutesato btio Ciorobtrou tlie4lst yoei. :hie( of. the 'More" Morittlitutp lieu: to no liolgo; Air paid"; ; • . ,e 1 1'