The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-12-10 00:00:00

■ ■ '~~ Wag COURT OF KING'S BENCH, Dgc. 9. BEESTON O. castrant.t. This was an action against a surgeon, carrying on bnsiness in pa►tner•hip in the Edgeware-road, for so negligently conducting themselves respecting a disloca tion of the plaintiff's shoulder, that she was deprived of the use of her arm. The plaintifrs case was conducted by Mr. GURNEY and Mr. CHITTY; the defendant's by Mr. ScaaLETT and Mr. ROBERT Sc.stmerr. It appeared in evidence that the plaintiff, a dress maker by trade, and between MI and RI veers of age, fell down and lend the misfortune to dislocate her shoulder. This was not known at the time; but findin i it in pain, she consulted Mr. Campbell, and went tittles to his house, when he advised with her, and gave her lotions to apply. Aftersome time she went to another rargeon,Mr. Ileadington,who discovered that her should er was dislocated,and that by the delay the reductionhad become difficult and dangerous. She therefore did not submit to an operation. but continued deprived of the use of her arm. Mr. lleadington wrote to the defend ant Campbell, but received no answer. That gentle man, Mr. Chevalier, and Mr. Wood, gave their opinion that the mode adopted by Mr. Campbell of discovering whether there was dislocation was uncertain, and that they would have adopted other means of inquiry. Mr. SCARLETT addressed the Jury for the defendants, urging that Mr. Campbell had no interest in mal-treating the case, but strongly the reverse ; that his attention had not been drawn to the case as one of dislocation, and that, at last, the plaintiff might have recovered the use of her arm by submitting to an operation which she did not choose to encounter. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE ■nmmed up the evidence, end the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff.—Dentagee UV/. VAZIE V. LOSE. The plaintiff in this case is a civil engineer; the de fendant one of his Majesty's counsel practising in the Court of Chancery. air. Agar pnrchased an estate near the line of the Regret's Canal, and the Company having i cut through his grounds, he commenced proceedings against them for deviating from the line prescribed by the *mune under which they acted. He recovered two verdicts in the Exchequer against them, and opposed them in Parliament. till all matters in difference were compromised, and he received a very large sum as a com pensation for the injury done to his premises. In the scars: of these proceedings, be employed Mr. Vasie to detect fallacies in the plans of the engineers; and to give evidence on the second trial. His bill for these oreratious amounted to more than 2941., of which lOW. l.ed been paid, and this action was brought to recover t e te Wince. The work done by the plaintiff was generally proved. Tt'e bills of caste taxed by concurrence of Mr. Agar's attorney were shown, thus far admitting the hills. Mr. Agar was proved to have requested the plaintiff, after vending in one bill of the description now produced, to Dead in another on the same principle. Mr. Millington proved the general reasonableness of the charges, bat admitted that the plane were highly chsrgeil—that be atteld Nothing charged ao high as three guineas a day for part of the work. Mr. ficattierz, fur the defendant, after eornmenting on the charges as they appeared in the bill,'stated that he shonid be able to prove an express contract that Mr. Vazie should have only a guinea a day in case hlr. Agar should ultimately have to pay him ; but if he was to he paid by the Company, be was at liberty to get as much as he could, it was, therefore, the good nature of the defendant which induced him to desire the plaintiff to send in hie hill on the principle now contended for, in order to give him a chance of getting it allowed as against the Company. He called Mr. [limp., who swore that he made the contract with the plaintiff in these terms. Mr. OURNIT, for the plaintiff, in reply, expressed his great astonishment and sorrow that the defendant should set up a contract so dishonourable as a defence to an ac tion—a contract giving to a witness a direct interest in the result of a cause—offering him, in fact, a bribe for his evidence. The party who said that he was the agent in tech a bargain did not deserve a moment's cre dit. For the sake of the witness of the plaintiff, and of the defendant himself, be implored them uttterly to re ject it. The LORD Cuter 3i:reins left the Jury to consider whether they believed the statement of Mr. Hinns; as, if they did, however discreditable the contract might be, both parties were bound by it, and Mr. Vazie was already paid. At all events, he thought that they must rake some deduction from the charges. The Jury retired at a little before 5 o'clock. and at half-past 5 they returned into Court with a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 1371. Ga. 9d. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. 9. RCM/LET V. GOODMAN. Mr. Serjeant Pam. stated, that this was an action I brought to recover a sum of W. due to the plaintiff under an agreement, and whi,ch he had paid to the defendant's wife. The plaintiff • was the defendant's father-imlaw, 1 and the defendant having had some unfortunate differ vices with his wife in the Litter part of last year, enter ed into an agreement, by which he undertook to pay the plaintiff, as trustee for his wife, the sum of twelve shillings per week, but which be had since discon tinued. The agreement having been read, John Powell prov ed an acknowledgment of the defendant that be had paid for a considerable time, but should not pay any Wager. Stringficld bad gone to the defendant in May her. when he refined to continue his payment, and advised him to pay to prevent further trouble and ex perce. Cruse examined—The defendant said lie would pay the money if he was certain his wife was living iu an ho w:livable .war. Witness did not know that Mn.s Good man was living in adultery with a man named Pitt. Elizabeth Slades, knew the defendant, the wife, and plaintiff. Witness knew Mr. Pitt, whose name had been mentioned; be was, she believed, in the East India Holmes a porter; lie now lived in Itegency-street. • Mr. Serjeant Vet:GUAM, for the defendant, contended, that under the circumstances of the case this agreement was at an end, anal could not now be enforced. If the Jury should be satisfied that the wife was living in adultery !, there was an end of the action. Richard Stewart had been long acquainted with Mr. and Mrs.Mottilman. On the last twelfth night witness was at Mr. Goodm:ttes house. Mrs. Goodman came in during tlse. evening, anal behaved in every respect as she had usually. done before the separation. Elisabeth Goodman, the daughter of the defendant, proved Gut her father and mother slept in the same room on the evening in question. Mrs. Elisabeth Moffatt bail known Mrs. Goodman he fore The separatism After that event she visited Nies. Goodman at Regency -street; this was about May last. In the errnintt Pitt came in; Pitt called her his "dear Jane," anal she called him "my love." Witness did nut see any improper familiarities between the parties. Mrs. Ilioodnean told wittiest' Ow was now happier than ever; that she luVed Mr. Pitt's little finger better thin her husband's whole body; she added, that her happiness would be complete if she retail have a child by hint ; they slept iu the same bed, there being but one in the house. . . L. Mrs. Cistle, sister to the last witness, remembered M rs. Goode r.th an a Mr. Nut coining ut cning to her bowie to yeller; did Ltd see ally thin;; partisdUar pass between ~i ~l - L:S • s ,; ~:.. - . VIU Mrs. Goodman sod Mr. Pitt, except that they called each other " dear." Stuart, son to a former witness, spotter in Ii East India Company's warehouse, had seen Mrs. Good man in May on London bridge, when, on asking her how her husband was, she answered, May be and his brother be doubly and trebly d—d." Mr. Sergeant PELL, in reply, read the words of the agreement, by which the wife was permitted after the separation to live where she pleased, and was to be to• tally free from " all authority, restraint, controul or di rection of her husband," but was to be "in every res pect as if sole and unmarried." lie then commented at great length on the incredibility of the last witnees's statement. Lord Chief Justice DALLAS in charging the Jury, said. if parties agreed to a separation, and the wife returned to live with her husband, common sense would declare that the agreement was at an end. But he should be very sorry to declare that a casual visit to a husband by a wife on a night of festival, as in the present case, should oblige the hus band either to turn her out at night, or should leave the wife destitute, the agreement being destroyed by such a visit.— As to the adultery of the wife, if the Jury thought It Was clearly proved that she had lived in adultery, she was not entitled to any further claim upon her husband. An agree ment of separation could never be considered as a permit. slur for the wife to live in adultery, but, on the contrary, he should hold, that under such circumstances the husband would be entitled to bring bisection against any one who he could prove had been guilty of a criminal intercourse with the wife. In this particular case, the question was, whether she had actually lived in adultery with Pitt? Before he en tered on the evidence on this subject, he must say, that the plaintiff was, as to that, entitled to their favourable consi deration. for if she had been living in adultery, it was clear from the defendant's own witnesses that the defendant was acquainted with the fact, and he should have given notice to the plaintiff not to make any further payments to his wife.— If the Jury thought the adultery proved, the agreement was at an end, but if not, their verdict must be for the plaintiff— the wife's return for a single night not being sufficient to in validate it. Toe Jury consulted for a short time and then withdrew from the box. Alter remaining absent above an hour, they returned a eerdict for the defendant, on the ground of the wife's adultery. OLD BAILEY, Mosnav, Dsc. 9. GANG 01 BURGLARS. Mark Herd, William Watts, James Browne, and Thomas Fuller, were indicted for burglarionslv break ing and entering the dwelling house of James Alexander de Reymar, and stealing therein fourteen ' , flyer spoons, value 101., and other property: and Charlotte Bastfield for being an accessary after the fact, by harbouring them, &c., well knowing them to have been guilty of the burglary. The witnesses, by desire of the prisoners, were ordered out of Court during the trial. James Alexander de Reymar deposed that he rented the horse No. 12, Eonn-place, St. Pancras, and bad lived there six years. His house was broken open in the night of the 13th and 14th of November. When he went to bed his doors and his shutters were all fast. lie heard no noise to alarm him in the course of the night; bet on coming down stairs the next morning about 7 o'clock, in consequence of what was said to him by his cook, he found his back kitchen window up, the mark of an instrument on the sill of the window, and a spare hole recently cut in the shutter inside. The fastening of the window was broken off, and was found on the door. To get to this window, the parties must have climbed a wall ten feet high, as the premises were not open to the back, but hounded by a row of houses. The witness then described the manner in which the burglars had forced out the panel of a door to get into his par lour. and stated, that he found that 14 spoons had been taken from the sideboard in the parlour, worth at least 91., a penknive, a plated wine funnel worth It., a tor toise-shell snnff-hox mounted in geld, value 10s., and a deem. On the Monday following, he saw at the poliee office, Westminster, the whole of this property, and re': cognised it as his own. He could not of his own know ledge state who committed the robbery. Cross-examined by Mr. LAW.—It was broad day-light at seven o'clock when lie discovered the robbery. Charlotte Burge, cook to Mr. de Reymar, corrobo rated this statement, and added, that an umbrella of her fellow-servant had also been takes away by the persons who had committed the robbery. Thomas Pace deposed, that he apprehended all the pri soners about seven o'clock in the morning of the 14th of No vember, at No. 13, Castle-street, Seven-dials, assisted by his brother onicere Cooper and Ilandley. They found the door of that house open, and went up stairs to the attic, where they found an umbrella very ;vet. The witness lis tened et the door, and heard, as he thought, the voices of several men conversing in a very low key. He then burst into the room, and found some silver plate lying on the ta ble. Watts, Fuller, and Browse were thee sitting round the fire; Herd and Banfield were in bed together. Witness went up to Watts with a drawn cutiess, and told him ha would run him through the body if he stirred a step. His brother officer liandley ran to the bed, and placed a pistol at Herd's head, whilst the other officer, Cooper, secured the property on the table, which consisted of fourteen table spoons. and a wine funnel. Witness then proceeded to handcuff Fuller and Browne; whilst he was doing so, the snuff-box dropped from Fuller or Watts, he could not say which. Handley In the mean time handcuffed Watts. Af ter these three prisoners had been secured,' they ordered Herd to get up and dress himself, which head. 'He put on all his clothes hut his coat, which was hang* up on a chair; as he took it from thence, a knife, which the witness produced. fell from the packet. They then ordered the wo man Bonfield to get up also. Cooper then asked to whom the plate belonged? but to the best of witness's recol lection none of the prisoners made any answer. The witness then searched the room, and by the right-hand side of the fire-place he found a board loose In the door. Under that board, but at some distance from it, he found five skeleton keys and several other implements of housebreaking. On the back of the chair where Puller sat there was a blue coat very wet, and on the bed a pair of worsted stockings very wet and very dirty. The prisoners were then taken to the police-office, where they gave no account of the reason which brought them all together. Browne's whole clothing was very wet ; so had been the shoes of all the party; but at the time lie apprehended them they appeared to he fresh dried. Their hats were also very wet. On the Monday following, the witness went with Cooper to Mr. de Rev mar's house, and on examining the marks of violence in it,, found them to correspond with the implements of housebreaking found in the prisoner's apartment. It is Italian hour's walk from Mr. de Reyinar's house to the place where that apartment is, and in his opinion the breaking into the house and the taking away of the property must have occupied at least three quarters of an hour. This witness was cress-examined at some length, hut nothing material was elicited from him. lie said, that the female prisoner was very ill when apprehended from the effects of some blows she bad recently received. M r . de Reymar was here called to prove that the knife and sand but prednced by the last witness •were his property. To the first he spoke doubtingly, to the last positively. Joseph Cooper, one of the poliee-otheers who had ao• companied Pace, corroborated his testimony in all mate rial points. He found 14 silver spoons, which be pro duced, on the table, wrapped op in a blue rag, very wet ; be likewise Nand* wino funnel, which be also produced. Mr. de Reymar then kinked at the spoons ; he knew them to be his by the initials. He could not speak so positively as to the wine-funnel ; he believed it, how. ever, to he his. John Edward Handley gate the saw, account as the former police oQ•icers of th! apprehension of the pri• ' Room. He produced the umbrella taken away from Air, de Reymtr's house, it was recognised by that gen tleman's cook. This was the evidence on the part of the prosecution. The primmer. %%ere then called on for their t:efence. Mark Herd stated that he had never been out of his bed all that night, except when he got up to let the other prisoners in. William Watta said that Fuller and he went to Herd's to get some breakfast. Not finding him at Lowe, they waited till he returned. lie returned in a quarter of an bone, and shortly afterwards they were all seivql by the police officers. Thomas Fuller made Cie same defence. James Brown said, thst be called is at Herd's as he was passing by, and declared hie total ignorance of the robbery. Charlotte Bonfield declared. that she had been with Herd in bed from II o'clock at night, and said that there were two very decent individuals who could prove it. These 2 persons were called for. bat did not make their app earance. The Recorder then summed up the evidence, and the Jury returned a Verdict oft UcILTY against all the Prisoners. The Recorder recommended the four male Prisoners to prepare themselves for the worst, and to make the best use of the time they had before them, as their of fence was of a very serious nature, and one which it was necessary should be visited by ity. He was pro ceeding to address them further, when the female Pri soner, Charlotte Banfield, was seized with an hysteric affection, and carried out of Court in strong consul sionsile then again bade the 4 prisoners to prepare for the worst. As to the woman, her offence was of a distinct and very different nature. The Recorder then called op the three Police 05cers, who had apprehended this gamy of burglars, and told them the Court returned them its best thanks for the courage and vigilance they bad dis played in the capture of these offenders. Ile should take care that the utmost expenses which the law could swat should be paid them by the county. He also re• Minded the Prosecutor, Mr. de Reymar, that it was to their activity that he was indebted for the restoration of his property. Mr. de Reymar begged the Court to grant Lim its at tention for a moment. As the Prisoners at the bar had not used any personal violence, or given any alarm to any part of his family, he wished to recommend them to the mercy of the Sovereign. The Recorder informed Jinn that Lis recommendation should undoubtedly-he laid before his Majesty, when the fate of these hardened offenders came under consider ation. Eliza Physiek, a pretty girl, about 20 years of age, was indicted for robbing Mr. Baker, Tallow Chandler, of Foley Street; and Sophia Stephenson was charged with having received the stolen property, knowing it to have been stolen. The irisonWilbysick, it appeared, was a house-ser vant to the Prosecutor, and, after a service of 3days, she decamped with his Cash Box, containing certain writings and papers, two 51 notes, 8 sovereigns. and a guinea. The evidence against her was conclusive ; she Ives apprehended at Chatham on the 2d of November, (5 days after the robbery) and confessed the fact.— St4henson, a woman shout 40, kept a house of 111 rase at Westmioater. it was proved that she bad received the property from Plivsick immediately after the robbery: that she had chauged one of the W. notes ander etr cumstances of concealment, and that she bad gives false accounts as to the manner of her becoming possessed of the property. Physick admitted her guilt, but said that Stephenson was innocent : she bad nut known the property to be stolen. - Stephenson sold that she understood the property to have been a bequest from Phy sick's grandfather. The RICORDIR charged the Jury that the offence of the drat prisoner was capital. The Jury, against both, found a verdict of—Guilty. Mr. Baker (tbeprosesutcr) then stood up, mid begged to recommend Elizabeth Physiek to mercy. He had great rea eon to believe that the whole had been done at the instiga tion of the prisoner Stephenson ; and that the hulk of the money had fallen into her hands. When he (\lr. Baker) had apprehended Physick at Chatham, he had found her without a shilling; and he heard She had been sent away from Stephenson's house two days after the robbery with only Ss. In her pocket. The RECORDER said that Mr. Baker's recommendation should be attended to, and would doubtless have its weight. For the prisoner Stephenson, he should at once indict upon her the severest punishment the law would allow ; and she might prepare herself, therefore, to be transported for a term of 1! years. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. Yesterday J. Cook Clarkson was indicted for obtain ing 1001. from'John Anderson, under the false pretence of obtaining for him a clerkship in the Treasury. As the facts of this case have been already reported in TIM STATIMIA:g and the other daily Papers, it is not ne e ssssss to go into them here. The Chancellor of the Exchequer and Lord Lowther were examined; they proved that they never saw the prisoner before, and that they never signed any appoint. meet in the name of John Anderson, and never had any comtnunication by writing or otherwise with the pri soner. The defendant was fonnd gnilty, and sentenced to pay a fine to the King of 100/. and to be imprisoned for 12 months in the House of Correction. TUE KING V. .11, WWI WESTON. The defendant was this day called up to receive the judgment of the Court. Air. Alley prayed the judgment upon him. The sentence passed upon the defendant was to pay a fine of 1001., and to be imprisoned fur one month. TIIE AMATEUR AND THE ARTIST. 'As: Amateur lately an Artist engag'd Two rooms to embellish,—the one with the subject Of Israelites crossing Red-Sea —and enreg'd King Pharaoh and host in pursuit of their object : The other. the Derit, liorrilielly glaring, A sally, from regions infernal, preparing. The Amateur shortly is Town was expected,— The Paintings unfinished, the Artist projected A plan, that from witieb some delay might accrue, — Two HOOTS of high polish by WARREN'S fine J ET, One each in a Room, like a Mirror he set, That seem'd to reflect a young daemon to view : The Amateur came,—and "no deed is herr." He said as the unlinish'il work he survey'd; The words echoed bark, with an impulse of (tar lie turii'd, and his form in the JET was pourtrty'd;— " The Deril is pleas'd" said the Artist, " to shoot " In frolic, this morning. from PICTURE to Boor! H' gn, by-axd-by, to his phis's. iR the PAINTING ! The.4ematear steed in amazement,—they past The other to ciew,—and in terror aghast His image again in the RooT, though a faint one, He saw,—for it rather appear'd to renew T►e tinvuon, persisting their steps to pursue. The walls then with paint the Red Sea to resemble Were canted—but nor Pharaoh nor Israelite found.— Tax ONE HAD PAW') OVER.—THE OTHER WAS DLOWERS! Tile Artist now swore, and appesr'd in a tremble.— With Israelites, Pharaoh, and host, did abound His Palatiag that llloEnina now vanquisli'd and lacking By lasps,.or the Devil In WARREN'S Jet Narking! This may shining and brilliant Blacking, prepared by ROBIVIT WARREN, 30, titraad, London; and sold in every Town in the Kingdom. Liquid, in bottles, 6d. 1011. and lSd. each. Also Paste Blacking, in pots, and 11S4. each. A shilling pot of paste Is equal to font Is. bottle! of Liquid. •; Ask for WARREN'S Blackleg. 7 41 ZIn I I • }~ -~ Mtn COUNTRY MARKETS AND PAIRS. 1 At Worcester toll.free fan on Monday last, the sup, ply of the cattle was large, and sold well at 41, er lb. (fond milking cows found a ready stile. The supply of sheep was small, owinj to the hods, and the purchasers being numerous, they went off briskly at 4,1, per lb. The show of horses was not immerses, but good ones sold well. At Gloucester fair, lest week, there were reser cattle of all descriptions titan are usually seen at this fair, ' 5 4 particularly so of the be:ter kind of oxen, which sold a: rather higher prices than at the Late market s aud fairs in the neighbourhood: but the same dallnes•'till pr, tails for all other sorts, atil no ansendipient Sheep and pigs were also short in supple; Aired, ,e e r, d u i l in sale, but stores rather better; fat pige, .is. it. t o Ss. rid, per Score:. - . At Leek, on Friday week, good beef and lezq mutton we sold at two pence halfpenny per The butchers, we are informed, had, until very lately. kept up the price of meat at this place, to it per puri'd, which induced a person in the neighbourhood to roo, and oppose them, end meat, in cowl:pence, shank to the above low price. The butchers opponent w:i chaired thrcugh the principal streets of the town h r the populace decorated with blue ribbons, Sc ., as mark of their sense of the benefit conferred upon thy, by his services, —(l iechfield Joerau!.) LONDON II ARKEI S. CORN EXCIIIANOL MAIM LAWS. Quantities and Priem of British Corn, &e. sold sod del. vered in this market, during the week ended Satun.ii 3Uth of November : Z a. A. Qrs.s. Z. Wheat 3,13.7.41 for 11.930 4 7 Avenge .. 12 i Barley Oats 8.839 .. 9,364 9 0 ..,.a..... 21 Rye Beans Pease 6to . .1.033 12 I 1111RAGR PRICK Ot CORN TRRIP4GIIOI T ENOIIIIIII, /OR Int MIRK [DIMINO MOT. 30. • Pas. Ql. I. 41. • Pan lIR. L d. Wheat 3B 9 Oats l9 7 20 8 Buns 2B St Barley 28 7 Prase ...... . .. ......28 2 PRICK el GNAW SW &MAD *NIP, AS Mum :------ I. I. 11. I. Wheat, red, (On -4 22 40 Beam mall. (new) -20 :10 white, ow) 2O 48 --- (01d)....27 31 - red (Nw) 32 33 lick. (ure)....21 2, - ) ISO 36 38 -------- (old) .•. 21, 2: supetilie ... 39 40 -- harrow (old) ..26 2-, white (watt) 3B 38 (waw) ..21 20 ---- 6AO . 40 42 Brae' 92 41 superfine 44 48 Oats, feed 16 is Rye. (new) MB 84 - 95e........19 21 Barley, (old) Pi 2111 -4--- an lB 9, -.— - _. -- (new) Me superfine. ....0 *5 ---- fine a*6 Matt 46 411 Scotch 25 fine SO ile -- Pease, hot SC37 ' Pionr, per Seek $6 1 ---- maple !PSI Beennds 313 3 --- (new) — —.-- North Country SO 3 4 4 ......... white 2398 Pollard, fine. per qr...lt 1 4 .--..--.1 boilers (sew) .46 38 Hr.. 7 s HAY AIM STRAW, pit Lomp.—Dre. S. Pinto rtsto—R try. Ms. W. to 90,. Od.—Straw, Us. to Ms. 04.—(lover, t 2. 04. to lith. 04. ST. J soss's.--Hay. 00s. W. to 80s. 00.—Straw, 485.01. to 40.. W.—Clow, Ws. 01. to 945. W. WI" aCitAr gip—Ha y. Ms.o4. toBos. W.--ittraw,2Ct.Od. to Ms. 00.—.Clovor, 70s. 04. to 90s. ad. BIZAT. surrnrnms. asonaiv, bac. O. Prior relented by the Clerk 0 Übe Varier. rem tr. or rovirro(evis.) 6. d. B. d. 6. a. 6. d. 4 0 3 01 Beef ..... .11 110 tos 8 Pork 0 4 to Mutton .......11 6 Lamb U —() 1 ,4•1 4 111.1 r AT 1111111arT Till EAT. Beasts, 3,411; Oar" IVO Sheep, IMMO ; Pigs, NEW RATS r►aaeT, , sic. 0. Flit sl'. OF 9 POUNDS (DUO.) St. d. 2.41. . s. if. Ysal II oto • Beef 1 St• 9 6 Pork. 41 4 S 9 Mutton .1 6 9 6 Laub 0 0— 0 • SEEDS &a MONDAY, Dec. 9.—SfelvsWe rather a brisker Isla for fine samples of White Clover, without much improvemeat in value.—Red Clover and Trefoil are heavy le disposal, with out variation In price. No demand at present for Grass Seas. All other prices remain nominally as last given. PRICE or HOPS, riaCirr. to rne 110HOUOS MONDAY, Dec. 9.—The dement for New Hops is chiefr for good blesses Pockets and good Kent Bags, and prices may. be stilled as last esr►eney ; in other sorts but tittle do ing. Doty still supposed 198.000/. MAIDSTONS, DEC. A.—We have now very little doing in the Hop,Trade ; in fact, there are bat few of good quality' unsold, and es to the middling and inferior sorts, trey are hardly to be turned into money. The trade generally very heavy. Wintriness. Nov. 30.—The Hop trade continues brisk, ■nd the stork remaining in the market is very small. Prir. from 4155. to fibs. per ewt.; and a few very floe samples high as 795.-189 pockets of New and ten of Old eel* weighed. POTATOES. • SPITALMPLDS. per Too. aottot:ou. per Too. Ware....S4 oto 4 0 Ware . . . 10 to 3 10 Middlings . lloto 1 13 Middlings . . 1 10 to 114 Chats - 0 Chats . . 1 10 to tt tt Common R•sd 0 .'0 to 0 0 Common fled 2 It) to 3 5 Oaloas Os. to Os. 0.1. p. bash. TALLOW. de. ?Et Cwr. Russia Candle, yellow, I/. I9s. to 0/. tM.—Ditto, Siberil. Ibis. to W. Os.—Ditto, Soap,ll.l6s. to W. M. —Archangel, I/. 17s. to OZ. Os.—Town Tallow, W. es. to 0/. 01.-31elted Stuff, 11. ISs to W. Os.—Rough ditto, 11. Is. to W. Os.— Graves 7.5. to Os.—Good Dregs, 0/. 10s.—Soap. Landes yel- low, W. ISs. to Of. Os.—Do. mottled, W. Ss.—Do. curd, W. Ids.—Do. soft, 01. Os.—Starch, English, W. Ms. Pasca OF RAW FAT, per stone of Whs.—Price, by Tallow (as stated by the Tallow Welters), 2s. 4d. COAL MARKET, Mc. 9. Ships at Market. Ships .old. Price. 1181 Newcastle Oaf 33. 64. to 475. M. 32 licaderland MARRIED. On the 7th instant, Bermondsey, John Lse bort, Esq. of Broad-street •buildmes, to Janet, eldest deug:l - OIL Boyd. Esq. of Bermondsey. DIED. On Saturday, the 7th inst. - kii:abeth, wife of Mr. J. Jr:- sop. of the Minories, in the 61th year of her age. On Sunday. the Sth inst. Susannah, the wife of Mr. Wm. Passau, of Aidgate. On Saturday. the 20th ultimo. at Ryegste, on her way to Brighton for the benefit of her health. Eleanor. the wife of B. A. ili*Obie, Esq. of Stamford-hill, In the 35th year of hor age. Ow Friday, the 6th instant, Marriott Mari. wife of Wil liam Harrison, of Hanover-street, Walworth, in hsr Otlth year. In Great Doser-street, Southwark, Mrs. A. Austin. relict of Mr. E. Austin, of Hietizate. In her 61st yea-. On the 9th inst. R. S. D. Roper, Esq. of Lineoln's Barrister at Law. Lately, at Church-street, Stoke Newington, Mrs Martha Maddox, at the advanced age of Sti. Loodon : Edited. Printed, and Published. at the Mice c f "The STATE:MAN" and " Tea CONSTITUTIoN" ( .141 a V Paper.) N 0.297, Strand, by ft. WARDELL, L1..8 to whom all rommunicatlooe, Orders, &e. are rcsestud o be athirossedi h._ . MEM -d•mai•