The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-12-23 00:00:00

ELECTION for .COMAION GO . Tuesday, the Wenloots for Far -was held in St. DOnttan's Churi o'clock the Mclennan for the W' Price) arrived, and opened the basil Sir CUARLO PRICE said, that d'oubt, understood the object for assembled, namely, to elect sisteet present them in the Common Coup ing year ; and from what he had lea think they would have much troubl lion, ns he was not aware that the Opposition to those 'Gentlemen w turned by their several precincts . persons to serve the office of Common The persons returned by the precinct were the following : Sr. Baines.— Rohert Herring. EN. ( _ Wnithman ; Mr. Thomas Oak Smith. N ST A ns.—Mr.• Thum* Harper; Mr. ) 4 1 11.*Gla Mr. lire , ry Mar.iolt. • , • Sr. M A RTVICh I.I:DOATII.—Mr. Thomas Reeve ; jtv. Ro. beet lieiler4. ST. Sarut.cn ft Abraham Young ; Mr. Jobe DIM.. son; Mr. William Griffith; Mr. Jima Crook; Mr. William Murrell ; Mr..lobn itlarket. • ST. A !V DR MP.. Dol.:mktg.—William Joins Reeves, Esq. (Deputy); Mr. Wslliam L'musfex. If there were any persons present who had other in dividuals to propose for the office instead of those whom he had just named, now was the tans to come forward with such propositions. Mr. 'Flummox then rose.—Owing to WIOVII in disposition, it was not his intention to trespass on the present Ward:note ; but circumstances bad oc curred which compelled him to call the attention of the meeting to the conduct of some of their Members for the past year. He did not say that they ought to examine the conduct of those who had served, in an invidious manner, but he contended that it was their duty to take a retrospect of the things gone by, for the purpose of ascertaining what hopes they had for the future. If their representatives were found to have acted well, let theni have their due mead of approbation and applause; but if the case were otherwise, then let them have what they deserved, reprobation I Ile had not sought the means either of finding fault with, or of questioning any man ; but they had literally been brought home to him. Two hand-bills had been left at his house ; the one con taining nothing but what he deemed mere election trickery (that respecting Ted Ranier's indentures) ; but the other, he thought, invbived matter of no small importance to the constituents of Mr. Quin - - —r 17 POSNI sundry questions remesseti.mminseest..... concurrence' of confidential friends, tI trine is introduced, in proposing " an essiteiation riedectl to certain specific ot , jects, anti likewise pte,kis: not to exceed them ;" and in that circuit's thus .cot abroad there is not one word to iteim4e,, that the intended limitation is to be temporary, and the project a firm step only ; 'but the text and con test of the paper In every part plainly purports, that the projected limitation is meant, so far 'ai respects any interference of the nation, to he final and coli c:H.4,e; for, says he, " the people having cautiously interfered no farther than was absolutely necessary, would el9re in witnessing the nccomplishment of every wholesome principle of reform, emanating from its ' , roper source, the liotlst itself." Nor is it, Sir, to be imagined you had not ob served that passage of Sir GEORGE'S above-mentioned letter to me, in which, treating on the means of pre ser.ing our liberties, and after pointing out to me, a% persons particularly to be relied on in this work of reform, "your DevoNsulacs, FerzaetcLiAms, &c." he goes on to say, " in our opinion (re form) can only be effected by a :.catch', association, pledged to a few essential points, and likewise ,pletiged not to exceed them." In all this, coupled with the anonymous a rticle in the Morning Chronicle, there is a coincidence calculated to cause some alarm to Constittlional Refr,rmists. For if the high aristo cracy , seeing an imperious necessity of doing some thing, could once juecced in forming such an associa tion as should enable us to do a xi ay, in tile words of Sir GEOUGE CALET, " the boroutlimringering sys tem to a certain extent.," whereby, with his other 1 " specific items," would be produced what in his printed circular he is pleased to call an " erected I plan of Reform-b." The people, alas, would receive part of that vast debt of rights and liberties which is! due to them, at such first payment, but a very " 7/10. ierate" composition indeed; and casting my aged eye back over that space of time which has elapsed since the " gloiions revolution," when " a free Parliament" was merely talked of, bat not, even a first step either then, or at any subsequent period, was taken—and contemplating also the modern im provements in the science of influence—my mind ;las a sort of instinctive feeling, that, if the next di sidend were left to be paid them by "the house it self," they must wait for it till doomsday. But for a Reform &en to the undefined " extent" which Sii GEORGE in his private letter hold' . otit, your public .Address forbids 44 the worthy freeColders of York shire" to look ; for " your specific measure" .of be head of " the bo mokeibid is couldt int lto se ll (7These44l.llllyotiwth.nitit.ngPasrt regoetwfahrrsnaeattrsdidgllnieol'iloinmfgstalerevillantehstabeah:otiy;wor have uttered; bat what Was there ha a y' indivitin 7 usert a l ls t A h ien s em t s o se t l t v h h es e at , b or m wal e t h o ll acwatistysuenmhotteemaetbepirtveri:atePrionlite; iettfia's'' meetingpss s t :e ; and therefore to detail the roarer-4 confidence. He had a right to do what he had Report was signed by the eleven Mim4 the Committee, himself, and the City Re, prancer; and would they all have signed de. , misstatements 2 " if, Gentlemen," said Mr. I were capable of committing such a breach ertie confidence as I have been charged with, Quin knows that I'could h ave got up in the Court of Common Council, and could hive said that of him which would have sunk him into' the very ea r th. lle knows this—hut I shall say no more on this head; except Mr. Quin wishes me, or except he does that which will compel me to step forward in my own defence," As to the letter, said to he Mr. George Robins's having been revised, corrected, and approved by Mr. Quin, it contained a tissue of false hoods from one end to the other: and he would ,pate more, namely, that Mr. Qttin knew them to - Pe falsehoods. Mr. Quin having done what he did; to the, letter, did he not in fact adopt that prodnc -Ilen ? • 44 As to its publication is °the? Papers be- Ades his own," added Mr. W. 44 I know tbat he took a,copy of it to Mr Crowder, of the Public Ledger, and requested him to insert it in his Jour nal ; I say I know` this, because Mr. Crowder told ' me that Mr. Quin had been with him begging him to insert it." Ile stilt wished to call Mr. Q. his Worthy Friend, notwithstanding all these things.—. Mr. Shandy, when he was reproached for noticing the backsliding: of his Aunt Dinah, replied, Dinah is my `Aunt, but Truth is my S'istcr.—[Laughter and ap. plause.] —His Worthy Friend had compelled him to come forward with a little truth.—"As Mr.Quiti revis. ed and corrected this letter, I would ask him, after heso dmaarrieytporosfay t essio t ii es s e of t f h t i i n e g n s ds o hip m a e s , he fo b r ail mmaudste. howcon tend, that he has adopted them; and then to go and beg of Mr. Crowder to' insert them in his Paper.— I would ask him how he could dare to think of as. ser n t c ii l l u g sion '; In s what, hir. he . would. said, if f t hsiasyfotromemr st y co fa n ce? i Constituents could again place confidence in him, it should be his study to benefit them ; but without their full ion co orders. Mr. Toomrsox was far from being satisfied ; and then expressed the hope, that Mr. Waitisman would come forward and vindicate himself from the aspersions thrown ou Ms conduct by the hand. bill. Mr. Quirt denied the truth of the inference which nppeared'to be drawn, that Mr. Waithmatt was now either to criminate himself •or him (Mr. Quin). --How the Gentleman (Mr. Thompson) could broach Inch doctrine, he mild not tell ; but it was as absurd as could well come fowl the mouth of man. Mr. La Manes, in contradiction to what had been said by Mr. Quin, in answer to the questions which were put to Mm by Mr. Thompson, begged to say, that he was of the deputation that wa►ted on Mr. Quin, and that Mr. Q. did avow to them that he would support the Report respecting Mock Auc. tions in the Common Council. [Hear, hear!] How great, then, must have been his surprise, when he learned that Mr.. Quln had opposed such Report, notwithstanding this pledge which he gave to a de putation from his Constituents; and that he further opposed it by the letter in his Newspaper, which was alluded to in the fifth question. There was present this day another person who had Mr. Quip's promise to support the Report, namely, Mr. Vale, of Bartlett's-buildings. But further respecting Mr. Quin's answers. To Mr. Q.'s reply to the sixth question he would give a flat denial ; for he would tell the Meeting that Mr. Quin did go round to the Papers to request the insertion of that letter. Hear, hear ! and some clamours.] Mr. Q. had called on Mr. Crowder, of the Public Ledger, with a copy of least thus much 1780, touches not a hair on I . and Nlr. Wait Inman. _i. proil__ _ 1-. . . roughmorigeeing system." 4 8 ; 11, wh — i c h --- 1 the letter, requesting its insertion; at least tile._ , ..... sturdy _ . _........ ...e.i. ii ...- 'to those erotic:nen, or rather to Mr. had Mr. Crowder said to him (Mr. Le Maitre). He ! fidence he desired not the of fi ce. Instructed by long experience, lem fraught to set possibir they r. might be able to auswer honourably said 1 Mr.Quie, in reply to the impassioned harangue much the sago value on the professions cf our lamented that he was bound to bring forward these " u t° ' ' houestly ; but if they were not able so to do, be l l derate"Refortnist:, that ( heir tit step will be followed circumstances. of Mr. Waithman, observed, that some might think thought they must be deemed the vilest and the most up by another and another, until the same feelings of Mr. QUIN was compelled to answer the misrepre - that he had on a former occasion supported Mork ; worthless beinas for representatives of that Ward oni Constitutional Reform, as contended for by others' sentations which Wiest been made. As to the first Auctionsand Itinerant Auctioneers—but against them the face of the ° earth. 110 had no political hostiiitye and myself, shall be accomplished •; as I set on the ; point, how could he pledge himself to support a Re. ' l lie levelled all the force of his opposition. As to the ; to these Gentlemen ; he thought candour compelled engagements of those Members who, refusing • to co- him to act as he was about to act towards them both'. port in the Common Council, net a line of which he', meeting which the Report noticed, he still maintain. operate in the best and wisest measures of patriotism previously to its being read in i ed that it was of a private niture to all intents and The hand-bill hi question called on Mr. Quin to give; was acquainted with out of doers, yet readily promise to rote for nn y 1 plain and direct answers to the following plain ques. I the Court ? As to the second point. candour corn. 1 purposes •; and that it was unpardonable to detail in measure of Reform ..vhatever, moderate or radical e 4 pelled him to say, that he had enclosed a copy of the ! the Report for the Common Council what tool:. 1 , Lions :--- when moved in " the 'lousy itself." Both of them ' to, Did you not, previous to the late discosstoo relative to 1 , kis4er and sent it to Mr. Crowder, by tlw desire of place - at such a meeting.— [ lear!]-11e objected to may profess, and may promise with the utmost sin- : Mock Auctions in the Common council ,. proosisr to give your Mr. Robins. Ho thus acted only as the agent of an- I the Report, land 'he opposed it on_ that clear and cevity ; but while from their moral characters, I may sup port to the Auctioneers in opposition to the interests of the 0 ' Sher—he did not send it on his own account. [Some: strong ground, because it detailed private convcrsa kair t raders ? believe this, I yet cannot give them credit, as Re - idly , Did ye n not al - terwnrds, when waited upon by a Drpii- clamour: ] i tioise, and contained facts positively denied by those formists, for having looked deeply into, and ac- Mtion from several of t our Constituents, proiniae to .support the 1 Report of the Committee ? M. %I/AM/SIAM then stepped forward: For the I who were present,and by these to whom they related. quired a real knowledge of, the subject; so as to ; Sdly, Did you nut, in violation of this pledge made to the ' last 19 years, during which time he had represented .In the Court Many came foreord who were present see the true effect of their own mode of acting. There ; said Deputation and others, oppose the said Report in the Gnu- them, he had always been able to answer the- accu- ,at the meeting, and said, that what it set forth was never having been raised in time past, h t all i ts aw . In w i i i t % Coun c il, Lad t ;i o i l d iee i r n , order dec iar r e o l g at ron t o s ie nn yo , utriosnett,6:ericat e f ;r t l e: t t . s sations. which had been brought forward against false—that the account of the conversation was not fulness, " that general union of voice, which can although signed by 4i. Waldman and the rest of the Coin- him, however virulent they m,ght be : but never be. i correct. Mr. Alderman Atkins, Sir James Shaw, alone effect the preservation of the Constitutione," matte ? ly, Did you not, a few days after, insert a paragraph in • fore had he found himself in so painful a situation ! Mr. Murrell, and others, all came forward to of what avail was any vote of a Se e BRIDGE, of a I your 4t ewe Paper , complimenting yourself upon' that Speech, ;as h e was now placed in. It would be difficult, he 'this effect, and therefore he opposed the Report of his Fot, of a SATILE, er of a WHITBREAD ? and with. wherein you calumniated your Colleague, and other Members , fear ed , - out such " union of voice" what can the projects, :. —ri d did i r i u 13"tair send s ceples of ) our Paper to the prinei- ! to answer what was alleged against him ' Worthy Friend. Was he to support X Report which or the professions, or the plans of yourself or Sir ,' P sthly, T Did n ‘Fou not lc one e r ? consult with and as . sist Mr. G. Robins in (man with out casting something like imputation on a : contained what was false, according to those who whom he hod hitherto been proud to call his could judge of its trutis.—lllear, heir I—That1 —That Gurnee, 9r even of 44 your DEVONSDIRES and your the drawing up of a Letter signed " Arc AucTioNE.tt, nu/ i ftiend. Many of the circumstances attendant on . petty, mean, and malignant Report found no one to Ferzwiereems" do for us ?—Most assuredlylnothing! a l.ioj o t;l e lir,olNrc and. li'mOrNicv"agiossly r as el w ec e t l i l o: s o o i n i t s h h e e c p b r a o r c ac es t o p f I cannot, therefore, I confesss, until a different : the debate vb hich took place in the Court of Com. support it, save arid except its Worthy Framer—not mon Council on his (Mr. W.'s) Presentine a Report even one of the lion. Gentleman's shadows could be of the Committee of Traders ? line of action be adopted, set any intrinsic value on ! &lily, Did you not road slips of the said caltnenions Lotter to I ? 1 respecting Mock Auctions must be fresh in their , the following profession, which I believe to be very ; sole nc o l f 7 i t y Psi i e t Ts y , o n: i d io c t i se l I your se l f _ lue pi e s t o o f r you u r ei llaTer gal co ri Zi n nina. fond to assist him—all loft him—and it was dis recollections : some acc o unt of it reached the public, : dainfully thrown aside. So abominably scandalous honest, of my worthy friend, Sir GEORGE CALEY. the said Letter to the Auctioneers ? `but the report of what Mr. Quin saillion that occa. - did the Court deem the Report, that they thought it 111 In one wish , however, we can most cordially ' These questions he felt it his duty to put to Mr. I shin, as it appeared in that Gentleman's Journal, : unite, let us have a RADICAL REFORIM." Be Quin, and to receive separate and distinct answers ; I evidently written by himself, it being in the fi rst treated It by rejecting it ss :di scorn Quin; mpt.— called for (he mark of ludOlnation with which they had before said, " We MODERATES only differ from and he agreed with what the Bill further said, " if ; person, he did not see till a few days three: he Was sin you in the means, not in the purpose. We wish to Mr. Quin entn!rl answer these questions satisfactorily l in the habit of reeding only one Paper : he, how. ,to be held forth as one of the most sinful of [l pplause:l—And yet be (Mr. n was to ask just so much, and no more, as, by means of the to his Constituents, it would imply a serious charge ever, had procured a copy of that perfected speech, , nets " because he would not support such a Rep . ° . t, . new vigoaril thus thrown into our Representative upon Mr. IVaithman, and it would be incumbent an d t h a t it was Id 4 (Mr. Q.'s) re p or t th ere cou ld be ,In opposing such a wretched and disgr aceful l . t . e " Body, would insure—yes, the word is " insure," upon him to explain his conduct in these trelisoc. no doubt, as the delicate touches and exquisite finish —"that Body having the power and the inclination" lions." From neither of those Gentlemen did h e o f hi s wor thy f r i en d. On thi s occasion i t wou ld be •to Mock Auctions ? Because he opposed one 'Pe w ' port, what proof' had they that he was friend.i!, —yes, "power," and " inclinalion"—are really call for the exertions of eloquence—he wanted sa- difficult for ; him to exculpate himself without risking of deceptions, was it to he an argument agaiw i t . the words,—" to do all the rest by a legislative pro- tisfactory answers ; and if they could not give them th e c h arg e of v i o lati ng .p r i va t e confidence ; b u t a s him that he would therefore sulaeort deception t % rem We aim at no partial or moderate regenera- he must deem them traitors to the trusts reposed in mu ch as h e cou ld h e wou ld a b s t a i n f ro m saying j another kind ? At the private meeting a° uu" tion eventually ; and at one blow would do away all them, and of being the most *treacherous and ra- what might well expose him to the charge the root of the evil, but leave the branches to wither :' dilating characters. In palling these geestione to viously to the debate rumours had got abroad how I 'every thing was left to the wild and disordered ma ! pre.: were takeri—no facts were committed to pap?r— you, on the contrary, would legislate for yourselves; ' Mr. Quin, lie must repeat that he (lid not want to lie did not know, that on such occasion -Mr. Quin and do away all corruption ,but your own, root and be aniuiesi with any display call on Mr. , ur gination of his Worthy Friend !--(Loughter m uad . or oratory, nor by any intended to defend the auctioneers •and certain it applause.l—And he would now branch." Here, by the way, as is riot very uncoil). ' rhetorical bursts—he re ;aired only plain, honest, was th a t th e y re li e d on M r . Q u i n . 'mt. v a l e , NI, reit ho state whether he had not told the truth rc. anon in the warmth of controversy, the irregelarity . and homely answers, which ; all might understand.— , Le Maitre, and others , forming a deputation from spotting that Report. untruly imputed to opponents, is the very irregu.. [Hear fl—Tbese questions were then put separately.; tils constituents„h Why actualtyprectired by the sects** parties.—' Mr. Qui x said that he had indeed a liu ed before this waited on that Mr. IVAITUMANI homy', sags spoke; vi a he ge mibrOof ! Gentleman ; and in answer to th eirs request lie would tell Mo Quin, in contradiction to what be Put of this more fully in its proper place. ! interrogatories to answer — lnterrogatories which the ' promised to support the fair trader, nd the oh had been pleased to say, that not one of the In this place, only one additional word. What proposer said, had been brought to him at his house ; jects of the report.; therefo're Blow great was the contained in his Report had been contradict,,ediior: is the essential di ff erence,' so as to be an object of but notwithstanding this statement h'e would ask, for sor pise o f a ll w h en th e y saw th e cour s e which Mr. i denied.—Plear, hear . I ]- 11 e could assur e Ir ,' ‘ lk , rt. blame, between - lopping off at once a branch of ,he also might question, whether its fact those questions ! Quin pursued in the Common Council, opposing ' that he was quite cool—that lie tube as not at all aeS corruption, or extinguishing* ifs life and leaving it to did not emanate from that Gentleman's own mind? I that Report ! [Brew 9• In Mr. Quits's perfected In public business there -could no secrets, and W O 44 wither? " I Mr. Trioatrsox,interruptine Mr. Q. said that they '.speech, he was made to condemn that Report, and therefore he would now let the ‘Vardmote into . Now, considering unlucky coincidences and all , did not originate with him—that haying been handed the objects and motives of those who prepared it. idea of the motives which induced Mr. Qui t " fi re r facts circumstances, will it-not, think you, be expedient ito him in print he bad deemed it his duty to r e q uire ° Amongst o th er t hi ngs h e . o b ser ved, a lluding to step forward in suPlunt of the auctionee rs ' ' t to remove obscurity, by explaining what is the real i• Mr. Quin townswer them. I words said t o ha v e been - uttered by Mr. Winstanley, R had been expected that at least lie was net It° meaning of your pulitistied document? Whether Mr. Quis resumed.—He had not expected this Mc. G. Robins, and Mr. Harry Phillips, that he be adverse to the Report, Mr. Quin canu• .to bio yourself and present associates, on whose behalf 1 p r o c eeding. Hut at a moment when party spirit had j (Mr. Quin) could not believe them to have spoken ' '(Mr. Waithman), and said, ".My the freeholders of Yorkshire are addressed, really ceased—when there appeared to be nothing but !plea. i the words which were attributed to them, for 11.4 m ust say something for the auctioneers —if 1 id be mean their Inoderate reform to lead us in the end to (lid unanimity—on such *a glorious day should they I could not reconcile it to himself to believe that he tumid b,:t. get their advertisements, they wcia...in.. a rtutical reform . , according to those " genuine grin- here be engaged in party squabbles ? The confi- i could have u tt ere d w hat mast Imo disgraced their worth a thousand a year to me !"—lle no"' 6 A g flag Cirlet of the Constitution" spoken of in your " ad- dence of his Constituents he had gained o n public i characters, an d v i o l a t e d t h e f ee li ng s o f the whole ly brought forward this fact ; inde ed it tv " -- w o o e r vertisement," or Noe? Will it not, I ask, he ex. grounds; and on public grounds only he hoped he profession. [Hear! from Mr. Quin •] Mr. Quin from him; but if he stated this, together with rn. pedient that your true meaning shall be distinctly should lose it, if ever he were to forfeit it. As to ' then went • . pract i ce of • ' thin that were in his power, in the Court of ICo on to protest fleetest . the e dear IN aithm.a.a! avowed? and here I will only stop to ask one far- the questions which had been put to him, 1 0 the fl uting what b e d passe d i,, a p r i va t e con versation mon council, or the debate, he repea ted it, , 7 so ,,r tiler question—" Would the eloquence of angels be first, he gave a decided negative ; to the s econd ' for the information of a p u blic b o dy. Wear, hear !. would hare been sunk into the e a r llh— L' al r able to persuade the strong minded freeholders of he said, " No, upon my honour ;" to the third, he from Mr. Quin , ] N o w the etfe.l of these obser- , and applause.] Yorkshire, that, in totally disregarding the intrinsic answered, 44 I gave no pledge, and therefore as I , rations was to brier f orwar d three charms against Mr. Wil iam. explained unce s rt' wisdom of the foregoing declaration of the Friends gave no pledge, I could r eplete n o so le mn p rom ise ; , him (Mr . see) ; fi le r le h• t s ta g ed in , listing to the meeting at Alderman Atki"s is ) which ,ma mg tm o i of the People, in an address composed after 15 years and as to the latter part of the charge, I did not the Report gross falseltoods• secondly, falsehoods ; have not space to insert. more experience than you, In 1780, had enjoyed, lay that the allegations of the Report (the Report of a nature to degrade private ' individuals ! wo c. PRICr then proceedest to pot the names (see .1. you, arid their other leaders, in 1814, had acted presented to the Common Council bp Mr. Waiihman: who had t mem), nod ? b ey not the opportunity to answer for them., were severally agreed to. • 14( her husittem of the Wardas..te being dispo.e , II of, l' e wisely ?"—ltemain, dear Sir, very truly your friend respectinw Mock Auctions) were false." TO the' thirdly , in h e selves ; arid that sac.. Report he had been If - was dissolved. circumstance a ; and servant, fourth question, he replied, " that in making up an ', guilty of a breach of privrne - confidence. Respect. Nov. 20. 18:::. JOIIN CARTWRIGHT. , Evening Paper, great demands were made on the i ing Mr. Whistaidey, the Report simply stated that • " Temperate Zenl."—The Address. Morning Papers, in cutting out sundry ititellieence ; i he was present at the toweling .t or ni r. ttobins it :,. f " krectuallt reformed."—lb, • Coley's Circular. i Written with .he same emphasis as here. " :Sealy infused vigour. —Adarke. and the complimentary paragraph in question was 'set forth that he SSW, 46 Well ; Oleo. I shall go cut out of a Mornine Paper by a son of Ilia, in hisidoon to the House and oppose the Bill. and throw ' Loxot eye. p rimed ne e ... v . o a 'absence, and inserted without his knowledge. Pa- ' It oat altogether, as we did the former ;" and Mr. Steer:see:a OM' L, lir, t iect•street. runt isti . ed h 9.•L0 vls Lt't a t I MARRIED. On the 18,h Wt. at St. Pancras. J. TroughtanyFilP—J°:6,: toil, ll.Lnts.._t_t-ttrce.t,rlMPsq THE S'r.43,74KAN. . OUNCIL-31111 41, pets leen sent to the euctiosees* grow* to their Phillips Was ire oederi f and had t he not ti right to Nod them under much right to TingdOn Without,' Mich 'Arm:mammies ? • As to the advertising sue- k ee p er cou ld hi i d,. Defer. one Hones's, hit belie* his Paper was the least adorn, i them to have in twos by a uctioneers"advertimusents. ohe IA those at irard (sir Charles ed of any isles. of the day.. —Re deprecated each enquiries as were involved in those i ll dirid ee t all present, no the questiop. Having great friendship, for. Mr. of auctioneers which they were George Robins, suppose he had usitted Mr.. RO.• dome, the mee ,?n persons to re - bins to orawifig up the letter, what impropriety of in presence of mcil for 'the ensu- coadacit was there hi that act ?. flat he would disc- Remembrancer earned he did not slain to *her himself ender the obvious indecency sations that pa ble on this occ.a- of th e question. --The letter was shown to him, I private confide here would be any ;he accepted of it, and inserted it in the Traveller ; I done. -The RI rho had been re- but all that he had to do with its composition was ; hers of the Cc as fit and prop e r; to make soma grammatical corrections, agreeas membrancer ; mon Councilmen. ! bly to the suggestions of his Printer. To the , grading misstal nets for this Ward sixth charge, Mr. Quin said,' " No! relody to idno- W. ' t wee thing of the kin j, on my honour." the ofpr ‘ ivate r b c on ;Deputy;) Mr. Robert seventh, he said, the Papers were sent agreeably to ; Mr. Quin kne ....t- _~. __ —.tor v",.**11.40.4.0", T' . . • *it • ;Zr - are Ad Fr s afr 1 • Ti Si at lb •I am th 111 hi bi • 31 • a • • • • 1 • to• Dr I,e to e r to 110 • I, • be • Jig per ins uin )of s , • e , • her' •• ore I ! 4 :11 • • P'T` J'• r '' R~. '. M 1 ~~ ~: kr: .;~i c