The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-01-06 00:00:00

[1 Went fain of bent Court At it SOW gob DsOmbey, Honourable , stoners for,,tbe plait and Depety Chairman, Paragraphs proposed • letter )Isikidarilsittlf At the 28th 16th, proved. Reed b. *Meet. c ' fairs of maa, .dated . Faragraphi a letter' • ' InICILIPIOII.__ . PUTT ClIAIIIMAI4) ItSVIMIL2I) TO If TIIICPSECEIANO • .1113/141211. . , k logs Sauk Dee. p, leit. GiriaLunag,-;4 Ths conferences held at this Board with As -60100104. of Correspoodent*, having had for their ottierte Olo,leier unreserved and candid &- ens:does dose foie* of the greatest irportance, with respect to the- 11110Witi Of the, East India company's Charter,' and it having been understood that no fusther steps should be taken upon the subject, until a conteunicatiop was made by me, in an official shape, to the 4of Directors, it was not without some surprize . :the copy of their Resolu tion of the 18th instant %relived by his: Majesty's Go . vernment, because ' at Resofetion, adopted under such circumstancei t appeared to them to have for its object an abrupt termination to all discussion. They cannot, however, consider it th? less incum bent upon them, through you, as the proper °lli- cialobantiel, to bring before the Court of Directors the principles upon which the opinions I have to op- prize you of have been formed, in order to pre. sent to the Proprietors and the Public, a• correct view of a subject, to which so much importance is attached. t , tr. I I, shall, therefore, convey to you the sentiments! of his Majesty', Government, ,precisely in the terms I should have done, if no intimation had been made of the Resolution of the Court of Directors, of the' 18th instant ; and with that object I proceed to in form you, that with regard to those points, to which the attention of the Committee of Correspond ence has been chiefly directed at the conferencesleld at this 'Board, the principle uniformly maintained, as the basis of any arrangement for the renewal or the East India Company's Charter, viz. that the meeehants of this country have as substantial claim to as much liberty of trade as they can enjoy, without injury to other important national interests cannot be departed from. It was in the hope that the opening of the export with India to the merchants of the City of London and of the out-po rts , whilst the import was con fi ned to the port of ndon, might not be found incon sistent with this principle, that a disposition was felt by, the Government to prdpose an arrangement to that effect. poit. , feet the greatest anxiety, and on which they urged their strongest objections to the , proposed arrange. , ments. . ~ The severaLarticles which may be imported from., the countriez.withits.the limits of the Compaq', Charter, and which are chavged wip an g( *mot duty, although with the exception 4( tea, theyNegli a very small file portion to the whelp of the nivenuoi co ll ec ted from;the Trade from India and China, are nevertheless of sufficient appearance to defeats& the attention of Government, as the questiog ma, sleet , the interests of the East India Company, as . well as those of the public revenue. . . . With this view, it will be necessary; tak. cons i der, whether, with respect to seine of theta, 1s 'sled duty might not .be substituted, and whether ado!), may not be made for the Security of the ed va- I RO lorent on those articles which shall continak o be so ' I Charged, and which, at the same time, shall pre vent their being purchased at a price likely to ope rate injuriously to the manufacturers of this country. The justice of the obaersations respecting the ad ditional number of Europeans that would find their way to India, in consequence of the extension of the trade, must be admitted to a certain extent ; but it is obvious that this danger would arise from the eaten.' sion of the export trade to India, and would scarcely . be lessened by confining the import trade to the Port of London. Every individual, during his re. sidence in India 4 would of course be subject to the existing regulations of the Local Governments. The situation of Wears, who are occasionally employed in the navigation of ships from India to this country, would demand the humane interposi. tion of the Legislature; and there can be no doubt that effectual provision for their maintenance while in England, and for their return to India, will be made. Having gone through the principal points to which our recent conferences have related, it may he pro per for me to apprize yen, that his Majesty's Go veraioon t are of ()pillion, 'that the establiahnveht• of King's troops which may be requisite for the preset. vation of the peace a c rd security of the British pos. sessions in India, must depend upon circumstances I that it would be difficult to anticipate; but as the I financial situation of the Company may render it ne cessary,. that the numbers to be maintained at their , charge should be limited, there cats be no objection to propose to Parliament to specify that number by legislative enactment. I I have thus endeavoured to bring the sentiments of his Majesty's Government before you, with the same candour that has been evinced in our recent discus sions ; and I can venture confidently to assure you, 1 that my colleagues, as well as myself, are most anti . ous to promote such an adjustment between the Public and the Court of Proprietor*, as may be sa ! tisfaetory to all parties. I The expediency of adhering to that system, by which the Government of India has been. admini stered through the intervention of the Company, is strongly felt by his Majesty's Government; but it nittNt not be supposed, that there are no limits to that expediency, or that there are no advantages which might result from a different. course. 1 It is for the Court of Proprietors to decide,whether their own interests, as well as those of the numerous persons depending upon them, both at home and abroad, can best be preseried by their rejection of, or acquiescence in, those conditions, upon which alone, consistent with their public duty, . his Ma jesty's Government can submit a proposition . to Par liament for the renewal of the Charter. Tou, Gentlemen, must be aware, that froti its approaching _expiration, provision must be made, without delay, for the future Gni - emit - Mt iillndia ; and that his Royal Highness the Prince Regent, in his speech at the opening of the present Session, has called upon Parliament to make such provision. I have the honour to be, Gentlemen, Your most obedient and faithful humble servant, BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. The Chairman and Deputy Chairman of the Court of Directors. .In consequence, however, of the promulgation of, such an intention, several persons, interested in the commerce of the out-ports, represented in the strongest terms, that the proposed limitation of the import trade from India, rendered the extension of the export of no value to them ; and they declared themselves prepared to maintain, that this limitation was not called fur by aoy adequate motive of public interest. They urged their claim to an eval participation in the general trade to India, and their conviction, that theground upon which the exclusion in favour of the port of London was defended, viz. the addi. tional danger of smuggling, could not be supported, sud they we're satisfied that the alleged danger might be obviated by revenue regulations. They also en tered largely into the subject of the China trade, contending strenuously *against the renewal of the Company's exclusive Charter, and stated their rea sons for believing, that measures might be adopted by which that trado could be opened, without injury to the revenue, and without hazarding the continu ance of the intercourse with the Emperor of China's dominions. . The importance attached to these representations, induced his Majesty's Government to revise the ar rangement which had been in contemplation ; and al though they did not see cause, under all the circum. stances begin apon this question, to alter the opi- Moathettattentertalned, of the propriety tinning the existing restrictions upon the commercial intcrcourse with China, and of preserving to the Company the monopoly of the tea trade, they nevertheless felt, that the merchants belonging to the out-ports had established a claim against an absolute restriction of the import trade to the port of London: Under this impression, I addressed my letter to you on the 27th of April ult. The observations made by the Committee of Cor respondence, in their reply of the '29th of the same mouth, did not fail to engage the serious attention of his Majesty's Government; but after the best ex amination of those oliservations, aided by all the information they bare obtained from the Boards-of Customs and Excise, they are not enabled $o con cur in the opinion, that the proposed extension of the Import Trade from India would be pro• No. LXXII. At a Secret Cone of Direcrom. held on Wednesday. the 90th December, DlN—Draft of a lettere° the President of the Dotard of Commissioners. in reply to his Lordship's letter of the 24th inst. was read and.unaninspesly approved. No. LXIIII. LETTER FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND DEPUTY CUAIR. KAN TO THE RIGUT HONOURABLE THE EARL Or BUCKINGHAMSHIRE, NOTICED IN TUE PRECEDING MINUTES,. East Italia Haase. 10th Dee. 181?. MT LORD s —We were hoaeured, ou the 25th LBth that itt proceediag which . li t i l ' i g e been put open It by his Majesty's - Government, they importations to the out-ports, we think that woulciassuredly have taken plins more effectually to granting of this privilege would increase the spirit of goard . against so great a misconception of the real rash speculationiesim Great Britain and Ireland, and idiesstion, which was no other than to mark their- thereby the number of advent erers in search o f fo r . adherence to the opjnlonsthey hive uniformly enter- • Woe in India; for it is to be remembered, temembered, that those Weed on the diaper question, of eatendlig the advintarers would naturally seek fur new establish ' Wisest .4ntle from . ail to IN out-ports of, this mats, even out of the Company's' torritories, auf kingdom, which had formed the principal subject of thett;t endeavour to acquire real property. 'discussion between the Members of his Majesty'sl But, my Lord, this is only one of many points • Gevernmeut and the Committee of Correspondence.. which require particular regulations; and, at the knots certainly desirable for the Membem.of that stage at which we are stow arrived its the negocia ialepeed Committee, and it was thought that it might tion, we cannot but state to your Lordship the .Itotise unacceptable to your Lordship, to know that , anxious wish Of, the Court to be made acquainted 'the sentiments which they had expressed in the . ; with the whole . plan which his Majesty' s Govern- Goatee of discussion, were sanctioned by the una- meat may have in •contemplation to recommend to nintaus concurrence of the Body by shorn, they' Parlianment for a renewal - of the East India CoMpanv's were delegated. The mode in which the Resold- . Charter ; including Each amentitnents in the system tion was adopted was conformable to the usage of of the Company's territorial government and adnii. tbe Court of Directors on solemn occasions, name' nistration, as past experieeee me' have indicated ; ly, after a Report from a Committee of the whole the regulations deemed necessary for promoting the Court, which always requires signatures, and which, discipline and efficiency of the Indian army ; the at tte expe empow er . theCo m ed to m aintain in the present instance, was subscribed by every Dl. Ismouttatit ff ain in erce l w which b i his M a jesty t many ce be of rector. We trust, my Lord, that this explanation of the , pany ; and the p ro v isions • that ma y be thought rt.- _ Ided - satisfactory tr r ! quisite for settling the relative powers of the Board measure elite to, will prove to your Lordship and the other Members of hii Majesty's Government ; and while we return our sincere ac knowledgments for the attention with which our re presentations have been listened to, in the various Interviews with which we have been honoured by your Lordship and his Majesty's Ministers who at tesded, we hope, at the same time, to stand perfect , 1 . ,y acquitted of any design, eitheir to prevent or em barrass a full and deliberate discussion of the great Interests at stake. It is matter of deep concern to us to find, that his Majesty's Ministers seem still to adhere to the prin ciple of opening the out-ports of the United King dom to the importation of commodities from India. We have already, in our letters of the 15th and 29th A.pril last, fulls stated the dangers that must result the Company, from so great an entargemen. the privilege in Eastern commit* to British mer- I I reasonable, from the weighty iutimation conveyed in chants. We presume to think our objections to that the concluding part of your Lordship's letter. It enlargement have not been adequately answered;! brings into view (to repeat an expression used in our and we have to express the concern felt by the lietter of .the 15th April) " questions of the last Court, that no communication has yet been made to pot-lance to . the safet!) of the &wish E)npfre in India. them, of those representations which first led his Ma- and of the British Constitution at home." This is a jesty's Ministers to entertain, and which inducethem solemn subject for the country, as well as the Com. still to adhere.to the opinion, that the public interest patty. If, indeed, it should ever come under actual will be best consulted, by not confining the import discussion, we have that confidence in the equity trade from the East Indies to the -port of London. and wisdom of the nation, that notwithstanding all It would occasion much satisfaction to the Court, present' clamours, they will with to do the con)- ! should such a communication have the effect of obvi: patty justice, and to guard all the other great fine `,sting their objections, even in part, to a measure, rests which must come into question. But prepared which the most imperative considerations alone could as we shall be, if forced into this situation, to main have influenced them to oppose: and were it', taut, the rights and claims of our constituents, we musts unfortunately to fail in producing this effect, i yet express our hope, that the Company will nut be it is nevertheless desirable, that the Court of Di- ' reduced to the hard alteruative, of thus having in con rectors shall have an opportunity of reviewing ! tend for all that is dear to them, or to accept a Chat the question with all the intelligence that can be i ter, on terms which will not enable them to execute the brought to bear upon it. Your Lordship has, in- part hitherto assigned to them in the Indian systec 'deed, been pleased to favour us with a brief summary iWe have the honour to be, my Lord, of some of the arguments used by the merchants on I Your Lordship's most obedient humble servants, this subject—arguments, we must own, not_in the I (Signed) ' HUGH INGLIS, ROBERT THORNTON. least convincing to us: and we assure ourselves, To the II Wit iforourable the Earl of .that in adverting to them, your Lordship does ! R IL; .11,1,1eainslitte, &c. Rte. ate. not mean that the Company should be, concluded, The CUAIRMAN then informed the Court, that the or their fate determined, by what those who oppose only other document to he read was the Letter a their interests choose to advance; although their re- 1 the President of the Board of Controul, received late presentations appear to have so far influenced his last night. Majesty's Ministers, as to lend them to think, that ; The letter was then read— the merchants " have a claim to as much liberty of r tulia Board. Jan. 4, 1518. trade as they can enjoy, without injury to other im- I GENTLEMEN,—T had the honour to receive your portant national interess." In those interests,. we letter of the 30 th ult. and p roceed to conve y to y ea merresome,-ooe-eolopmtoodatt b ot h th e ; thu.santinusots of his Majesty's Govertunant r .m.isr ation of the public revenue, and the maintenance of as it would seem advisable, littler present &cum. the East India Company. But what that extent of stances, to continue the discussion. trade is, 44 which can be granted with safety to those With .respect to your ,obser‘ation, that the repre intevests," is still a question •undetermined. We sentations which induced his Majesty's Government confess that the regulations contemplated *by his to form.their opinions upon the subject of the ester- Majesty's Ministers, so far as your Lordship has sion of the Import Trade have been withheld frog bees pleased to explain them to us, appear by no the COurt of Directors, and that your objections t o means calculated to remove our fenrs.--. L 'he that extension , have not been "adequately Rower comparative interest which • the Public and the .ed ;" you must allow me to avail myself of this oat' Company have in preventing the smuggling of tea, sion to apprize you, that although his Majesty's (;,b. was described its our letter of the 29th April ; and vernment has shewn a strong disposition to eider the thought it be true, as your Lordship observes, that most , frank and unreserved - esplannttnns with tho the stake of the public iii this concern is Isomer'. Court of Directors, they have not (kit that it Wia call) greater than that of the Company, yet the im. ; within the range of their duty to engage in a contras portance of the Comny's inferior stake is, to them, versy upon the points at issue t duty has be 'r infinitely greater, th an would be to the public the im. discharged, in stating, for t lie inforrratlea portance of the loss the revenue might sustain ; be. of the Court of Proprietors, the condition cause, as spatters new stand, the Company have no • which they were prepared to submit a proposition certain / China - for Parlia' )t for the •al of theChartr . -,accompanitc in 1 1 COMllltitiii:t- of Commissioners and the • Court of o:rectors. Though these topic; were specifically mentioned in the letters from Lord Melville to the Chairs, of the 30th September, 1808, and the 21st March, Itit3, the CoUrt are still, in a great measure, uninformed of the arrangements, in regard to them, which his Majesty's Goverdthent may have in view to propose. And we entreat also, that your Lordship will enah'e us to lay before the Court of Directors, and ulti. matey the Proprietors, in any shape that you tray Judge lit, the informatinn, additional to that of the merchants already:solicited, du which the detelmi ' nation of his Majesty's - Ministers - rests, as to thee:- tension of the trade to the out-ports, and their iti lentions upcin the other parts of the arrangement to Which we have now adverted, - The re-qv:rests - we now' -rnerletr to as Om more rosittliq muct'll . 4! fore 60. him hivi with it. „, thy 14' glimn& urol' • does not sr , can fr am' at dlr.,' • .., .•)(141; lftrAr ',RIMP. TIT ge • It s , . '........ " - . . _ _-_ ___. ._ . .„---......,____...._,__- i , ).. ..... iii __ • . . ' " '''' 4 * .- t *l- - Oviiea - court a Direct° _ . Two ~, ..,_ , pigiv e rencei ot , ors . object.of tft! poitt.itelle of the Board of Commissioners (or the At which will, of *4ollllo, 4, • ihn In .' ;. • .1.- tot tiso To lo wered i4tlieli OA Wootd limitediatisly-lill4otheir 14 • •-, - , 4. 1 , •' .• • • P• . ' 4000 . . libit" In dk.. ii . "P ilinati°9 . ' credit would 1011 diedShbed—tite 'cokeney 01 their If India, with a copy of the Minuted of the th e details of the subject. . - t Court of the 18th inst. lam persuaded It, ea not escape youteenses-enn L 'lth. -:'. , .' ;'• '7 ' ll 'i lm• . nti that ,itt • the " inmen "' affairs, in their 'payments perticulirly,'• would be in,. No. LXVIIT. . don, that from °brims! considers**, tilisAgglialk.. Mt *farm and disaatisfectioWin all par. s . a Secret 'Committee of Corts*Pultdebiles the Chan .el must, St ti! Itmos, ospoeisqly hi . . "epfHliemits . i .of '.— ey's Mart*, it was agreee Gel . le d with this great atablbhinont would be ... . h 1.10 l • r• and the DePuP9ll3 Ito ' '*, here wOold ho it aecessity`fot going to Par. w,hoti.orila- great, rinritaps irretrie' T. December, 1812, read a letter from. the Right pea.. ~. .. . . . i ti o, o „ amp , ... .., .. . -; .. antes should be taltro . I . • : ,"' , 1r , have been y ex o p f er t ie h t e tce& .tnpiatnyis t t o he a du r t r y y arable the President of the Board of Commis. en. - 1 ' - r. - ~0 „ .„40 , , 1ii i, , ,,.. . os., • • , Wl' . rs for.the A ff airs of India,. to the Chairman *, .... . . )epoty Chairman, dated the 24th init. and " e t- ...L • ;440 t .,: ....46404...4: fP,.., 1 1 ,d, .%.,., , .. __......._. . lir il , i . , ),. . : . Accordingly, no ~. 11 1 establish ~ anOssa, , - •' • , Ott' Vida flip' , vollogn , • _,. , • , e, prior to the, • • . 'mph . Bod y .. ~.. ~.i i y oe. .4 pM jett ,, _ or of lbe .. l4lt orime d rimarimi ls inahtut '' l a . bear dors forward to such contingencies, sae to .. . . rag,to form part of 4e draft of typo's.- ,• `--,--. -„„ .....,.._ , . er to in reply. . But, with resiireWriti, is PeK - of the , re, e cour met ovisioo against them ; and we roust beg Irate . . i h o ots „atibi t itopoin. i hating IstOo Soiveyetritx these citatlaveru the Di- to add, that whatever tights the Merchants mar ' •••• ‘' ' Ito.llll. question, It is isw ' . . . • teliNfiteleiFif DWetors, Twit * -111416111, ,iesustssitilittiteSe*WitLialmt- AL •, *A .'ren- rectfon 7 whe are nie . MetniSers of de ibesittee of claim, or the Nation be pleased to best 4.4 . on 'them, Bth Dettriabar, 100% 1 liteatea • the 15th,Ition of smuggling. rro.ekn Testrellt ; . .. ysr 4,43orreePendepoe; 4•loo4nSovased, whebes.the'differ._,.it C.ltOpt,lo.4sl64yil4o,l4o—waket encessions to O m 18th, sod Slid instatt were ' and ap. ;no deuht, involindiolf;bui those of -e) w e f t ends* of, opinikwi t fhrofterly kneten. to oxist, , vs some which should destroy Ote Ciripany who acquired the d• -_.. ,- • ... • T 54,4 fight!, „.• " : I aresfill more coa4gW :. and' "eginot be 'opposed , Important potnrs,i hetheen his Majesty's Gettern- ' tAttlatt V4epirr:i el e tl ; ',vim Are Its much the owners of id* ItSteafeWiloV Ilonon .00,:pen. ) s ler woolitY ,. - i t . • . 40 '.. 'proposition , . ment and the Court ,, ` wens in a train of trencilitt- . tic chief seets of Eiropenn tradeidthat Empire , 'a f . J r t. of . the Beard 1 Coismissioars l 'Oa i- * aPP' ed I D AINti 4: ERRO"Pe i revenue ' titian and the genera ,answer which we thought Out- , the are of their freuboldilittbtolen. If India to the gmaritian and ip :Os-ii. of romthree twitter's 7 actor that, ifs dealt:a. . selves hued in duty to give, no t having tended to i With respect to the resortwf Europeans 10 indig o dated the . /.4 . 11t4t,,a1uq, 1•.„ A . . , Lion should uovape'etedtthrite, they would not Im. %f i ord. them tka satlshOion they expected, they ; if we donot misunderstend'thi Seope of your Lord. ragraphs propmt4 to form part o(lll;i4titit Of •rnedisteil take measures tat applyi4 ti remedy,: deesited.. it propel that the sense of the Court, re- 1 ship's obserration, kt . seeeWifrilowy,that theic Hunts. Ilr to his Lordship ie. irepiy. ~ • , The Company have; thereof*, so ample ground o f specting 'the question of the out-ports, should be ben might be in proportion to the export trade from 1.). .. t . Ita. LIX. . .. • Confidence t rot 'only in til? dis p osition Of Govern- formally notifieti te your Lordship, and in contl 7 , ; . this copnfrt, If, indeed, they were to he regulated • ... . - 9 the uoartinious Resolution of the 18th 44,i by this ice., our upprehensithis would be the less; ca 'max Tag RIG= IiONOVRAS4s 41[1111AILL OT went, but in their effectual co-operation on those queue. ai..l 11.•••• irrntnetatinna Sc the ont.nerts_ we think that tie CLINOVAXIIIIIIII TO ligg*!,oolAippgAD AND pg. points, on Which the Court of Directors appear to tt l ensrnit i ftd• Had the Court ' perceived that the . ; but we slit diff i culty In, a c kn o wledgi n g,-thi s t iii - ~. _. a._ ___........;ntr_ end on which they urged proceeding admitted 'of the interpretation which hss ; additl4:;n to afrOia otherargoinents against admitting P . in ifiC import A natal arum 101(1a. WUu HI ue pry. i na I 141.111‘18, I. V , WV. la asvosvu., - ...a, ..., 4..... ••••••••• •.... ducting of any greet increase of smuggliug, and 1 w i th the letter whlch your Lordship p as pleased to . c - itiiii v o - dei;e;tian - e; - b - otth - e C'hina v_t de;for - resources Parliament for the renewal of theehartii,accon i eertainly not to the entent stated by the .Court of ' address to us on the preceding day, and hare laid it essential, to their subsistence. Wrdo not the least by puch reasons as are conveyed in the comp Directors. I I ,.„ ; t a I before the Court of Directors. We are instineted question, that his Majesty's Ministers would be tho. 'lions they have authorized m' tp make. It is conceived, 'that the apprehensions entertainetr by the Court to I mpost,* your LOrdship, that a Ge. roughly disposed to frame 'additional regulations to 1 I can, however,. have no difficulty in actin on this account might be' obviated by various regOrl Hovel 'Court o f p ropr i e t ors o f FAttinaia Stock has PTem.ltt oratg a ttea; should those now in content- ' you, 'that the claims of the Met , hints coil bidet's, such u confining ' the trade to those ports)..bietspimmotted for theispetial purpose of taking pletion bet kerning! insufficient. But, besides . with the out-parts have not been bcaughtbefu which are, or seay be lo circumstanced, as to afford :IWid eon* ide4ti l en .the Itnortant subjects treated 0 that we g4tioltly rdistiost the practicability of pre. eminent h i ? , written' doCuMents; that 'they ha , security to the due collection of the revenue; by the: in ( g a o ler, Lordahip's Wier, and we sitett lose us 'enting smoicking to a large extent,' where the temp. urged and discussed at personal ' cooferenci, 1 limitation of .It to vessels of fear h un d r ed t u ns bur , iy,, .Nittio to xpi f s. Licritlsbip &seer& of - the de 141111s1 . lld be so great s we muse entreat your dividuals interested in .their succe*, - ,anti th den ; irr aiiatheal the rotfeltuee..pf . the -ship 'an -akosairnt attfiii nistj t ifr., - . r ,: - : , .Ltweititi n i v Titt -Nits' ihisotrs Mlnisteri .. serfoally to beim already been lefitmed• of thy grAusta , . 0 4 ' , l 141,4 , (.4 1 cargo 10. tbe:,4llloroary of say iii4sitteckeisii., 1 wlwrefereeeeito re Vn a itle sis oilalialre.orialLieeeiClei the 'hoodoo of the Com • wkish they were supported; but Ilvkit does 1 baud ;• 1 10 , •••itegaion a the jilanifestAnt 4. by Mil IlkiMilktifirJP .-.. et * • . it i lisigyr s4hertner no better pear to his majeity% teetrernMent,'thiit.ypu . gataticca ha ablaidcg the PrP4:40,0 Ais4.ll.wild iaapeivradi4i ' ' esta9.lke4 ' Ad „, 0410 4 0,... i i i i . 4 , id* * warrented.in expecting Oat 'bey should give "lit* of the CwirWMikgrlitikl?lr lOW It r servile to his MO t V t ./ _ t,IRIMMIt s es. It 401* ka..l4 . ololt . baTir . . itigektii ottaitip )1 11 ktiOev. igtiltit i # .o*arpfeenti atYPiari 141 " 99 t " * Pit. " " ""r Oll kg*" POssats 'lb blip for Its'. .` * J . airopeitgorigadiers 'I. lair: their gleigeng okosl4 =provided for or 4004r0Cail; • - . .. • . ... • - . . • • • ..• -