The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-02-08 00:00:00

when he was szamined e be gave Friusks the charieter of being an honest, industriou, JOU aat .ser man. It wa., true, in Lai affidavit, which was now producag, he denied this, and said, that although he represented Franks to be industrious, he did um. give him a *sander for honesty and sobriety. Bet witherespect to what 1,211 said by this witness at the owl, and which. he now pretended to deity (hawing since been under the tuition of his Master, Mr. Ken- rick) he (the Attorney-((anent) ishoulti show to their Lordships, I shot what he said was true. There had been an affidavit made by ' .bie.Drommond, a respectable 31agistrate, who was proem at the trial, in which he raid that no evidence was atlibaced to convict remote. diet the witnesses who arpcared egairst Lim gave him a good character, and that the Court. of which this gentleman feared • pan. directed the poor man's acquittal :no that, their Lordships would toe, in this case, the witnesses on the part of the pmeoeutson were alone examined. and that, upon their testimony. the Jury, without heating a word in defence, iostantly acquitted the prisoner ; and so strongly were the Coot Moire/teed with the impropriety of the prosecution, that they ordered his immediate whienarge ; and, upon application by the prosecutor, for the ex. the Conn refused to allow them. Ida °tenorTo—That I deny, for no application was made for the eapenees. The A TTORT: ET.G Raid, Ito read the words of the &Miaow it by the Magistrate who was present, old who stateS that tens emu wererefused ; now hue could that be refused which had nos been asked P Mr. Justice BAYLEY—The circumstance may even be stronger in favour of Franks, if the Justice., seal that no expenses would be showed, before any application for them was made. Mr. Aeooltwiehtiooomeo—He would ask their Lordships, Wiliam they reverted to these facts, whether it had nut very much the appearance of a wish, on the part of Mr. Kenrick, to carry into effect what he (the Attorney-General) had before alluded to? he meant the threat matte by that gentlemen, `• that whenever he rationt held of Franks he would makes public example of him ? " said whether these were not the means by which Le intended to co so ? As to the conduct of Mr. Kenning subsequent to the com mittal of Franks, and previous to his trial and discharge, he (the Attoraey-General) would now make a few temarke. It seemed that these circumstances attending the piece of wood, and the chimp of felony threaded thereon, having made some noise in and out of the neighbourhood of hlr. Kenrick, it was desirous to sup press it; a letter was therefore written by this gentleman to the gopkw, in whose custody poor Franks had been committed. It in quired as to the conduct of the prisoner since he had been in cut. tody, and expressed a hope that it had been such as deserved con sideration. It then purported to say, thnt Mrs. Frnnks had eaueated Mr. Kenrick to interpose for her hushaed, and '!het she hoped what he had suffered would make him more•careful of what he did in future. This part of the letter was altogether false ; what she did say was this, that she hoped hi, orderings would make hint more careful of what the children did in future, for it was one of the children that had taken this piece of board to make a rabbit-hutch, and Franks declared that he did not know of its' having been in his posseesinn at the time be was committed. The letter then went on to state that the facts of the case were so clear against Franks, that he (Mr. Kenrick) could not suppose that he could hope the an acquittal. He had no aniniosit• against Franke, and if he would plead guilty he might hope for a lenient sentence; and he waild suppress the evideoce of a very material whness for the prosecution. Here, then, was a gentleman, who was him :.el: a Magistrate, and who proeeruted, not from malice, but from a principle of public justice, offering to suppress material evidence at the trial of this poor man, if he would but confess his guilt ! But " I have no ante:lenity against him," says Mr. Kenrick. No animosity against him ! liney should it hare entered his naiad to write to the gaoler to repel so preposterous a supposition, that lie, Mr. Kenrick, the Magistrate, who prosecuted ouly from a re gard to public principle, had a feeling of animosity agairmt a ;our man when' he was prowooting for having committed ! a felony to the extent of 74d. in value ? The letter was ! sinned " Wm. kenrick." Now he (the Attorney-tieneral) would' oine what WAS the motive for wetting this letter to the gaoler ? He would ask if their Lordships could entertain a doubt that it was written with a view of making the man confess himself guilty ? But what was then answer of the gaoler to this letter ? It was this.— " Sir—l have received your letter, and am happy to say that Franks has behaved with extreme propriety since he has been in ni• custody. He says Le is extremely sorry for the offence that has been committed, but that it was done by one of his children, who took the hoard for the purpose of making a rabbit-hutch." This was what be had uniformly said. The letter then went on to say that he denied all knowlertge of any board, the property of Mr. Kenrick, being on his premises at the time he was committed, and that he considered it to belong to Mr. Bachelor, who had lately been allowed by him to oilier some timber on that part of his pre mises. Bachelor, however, who was a servant of Mr. lierotek, had said that this was CO put of the wood which he had put there. This might be sn, but at all events the circumstance was a sufficient reason why Franke, at the time he waa committed. did not advert to the board. in Mr. Ktnrick's affidavit, he said Inc only prosecuted from a 'sense of public duty ; he (the AttomeyeGeneral) would say, that no wan who had been influenced solely bye feeling of public duty would have so conducted himself as Mr. Kenrick had done; he would -have sent to Franks as soon as the board had been found, and have ascertained the real facts. But, although this gentleman had acted from a sense of public duty in the beginning of this affair, vet he abandoned those thelings before the trial. The proceedings haying gone thus far, it seemed almost inevitable that a trial must ensue. This being most desirable to be avoided by ,Mr. Kenrick, applies. Lion was made to the Magistrate to discharge the recognizance, these, however, could not be this disposed of. There was one ma. tend witness who was not under a recognizance, and this person . was consequently prevented from attending the trial. Mr. Ken rick also countermanded the attendance of the attorney whom he had employed. All this was done net to save Franks, but to save the exposure that would ensue from a public trial. He (the At torney-General) would again repeat, that if the only motive of the prosecutor had been to promote the ends of public justice, he could not have acted as lie did. And this viaduct was not the result of ignorance, or want of information on legal mat. ten, for Mr. Kenrick was a lawyer, a Counsel of many years' standing, and he believed had sat as Chairman at the QUAlter- Sessions foe Surrey. Let him ask, then, whether the proceeding.% as stated in the affidavits, vivre not harsh proceedings, calculated to ihew forth the observations of men ? And lie would ask, too, whe 'mu an editor of a newspaper was not entitled to make those things known to the world ? and if so, whether it was not also competent. tar him to make his comments upon them ? Let us see, then, what [H was the nature of this libel. ere the Attorney . Gener al went through the libel, and commented on the several passages as he proceeded.' It consisted of narrative and comments, not on the conduct of Mr. Kenrick particularly, but upon certain portiets of rear law, and such as he (the Auorner.Lieneral) thought were very proper. He would now direct their 'Lordships attention to subse quent facts, which, he should contend, completely afforded pro tective to his client. Mr. Kenrick came to their Lordship', to ask their interposition to protect his character from the imputations ercieh he alleged to he cast upon it by the comment. of the editor ‘,/ the More/leg Chronicle, at the very time when he had himself prepared • depcsition in which lie imputed acts of the grossest nature, and crimes earning with them the most penal conse quence:, to this same person, Franks ; but although he had pre pared this deposition, he had taken care to omit many of the fame. therein stated, in his affidavit. lie had, however, circulated it to ttleprejtirtice of Franks. The Loin CLIME JUSTICE—Where it your proot of this fat? The Aroonwee-GERomeo—Here is a deposition drawn by Mr. Kenrick, not sworn by him certainly, but drawn and signed by him, and mat to a gentleman of the name of Mr. Russell Col- lot, in the county, who got it inserted in the Stambrd Newt; and what added to the extraordinary nature of this circumstance war e n that Use letter to that gentleman was dated at Beaurnaris, vehneli snowed that he wrote on the Circuit, while actually dioributiug novice. Mr. Go RIMY said, that this publication was after the libel had been published. The ATTORNEY.GENICRAL said. he knew it was; but he would ask their Lordships, had Mr. Kenrick any right to come here to ask the interposition of their Lordships, after writing this paper. by which the character of Franks was most grossly libelled, and an which the writer said, he did not regard the calumnies of tows. paper editors ? The ATTORNEY-GENERAL then read the paper, whirls e& roved the circumstances respecting the charge again.: Franks' little girl, and then said. " that this was before the late Act for pro arced:lg the abettor of the act." Their Lordships, observed the Attorney-General, would perceive why this was said. The writer then went on to state, that he had known Frank, for years, and he had ocamn to believe that he had stolen and killed two sheep, the property of Mr. Petre, a Magistrate of Surrey, who had abundant evidence to prosecute, bet who forbore. from motives of humanity ; and that Le (the writer) had no doubt that Franks had been plum- taming his property for these ten y can past, but that he had had no evidence of' it before the ease referred to. nlr. Kenrick then pro ceeded to say, that he had very little regard for the caluinnica of the newspapers. The Loan Cuero Jo:oracle—flow is this letter brought home to Mr. Kenrick? The Aooonwzo.flogoitoo—lt had been ascertained that this letter was sent to the Editor of the Stamford News by Mr. Russel Ooilett, who was a relation of Mr. Kenrick, for Lisertion, a. haying Leen received by him from Mr. Kenrick. Mr. Justice BAYLEY—Has Collett made an affidavit? The ATTORNEY-GENE R AL—No, my Lord. Application was made to him, but he refused to make affidavit, on account of his relationship. Mr. James, the attorney of Pile. Ol went, laad first written to Mr. Kenrick, to learn of him whether he Was : author of the communication to the Stamford Neter, and that gentleman afterward,' waited on hint ; who, having read the letter car.plainerl of, declined giving any answer. Now, as to the charge of sheepoitcaling, 31r. Kenrick must have known that it was utterly unfounded, and of a most malignant kind ; and he (the Ateerney-Gener.l) would tell their Lordships why the close front whence the she, in question were stolen was near the high way :—Not far from this close a piece of paper was found, which was discovered to be in Franks's hand-writing. Upon this a suspicion was excited agaihst Franks, and the persens who found it mole instant application for a warrant against hiin. Bet the fileoistrate said he would not issue a warrant on such a ground as tied: the matter therefore dropped; and the fact was kept unknown from Prank, for upwards of two years ; and then, while in company with the bailiff of Mr. Petre, who had kept the paper ever si ace, the circumstance was casually spoken of, warm that person exclaimed, that he was glad it was neve: acted upon. Ai4 why ? What would their Lordships suppose had boomed ? hirer, that • man by the name of Bignold had been apprehended, tried, and convicted of this very offence, in the ailliirtiourb•od of Mr. Kenrick himself, and most. thereon, , base been /moms to Jahn. Bat thit'irts only one of ;be charges the other was respecting the child. The greater part of that, as regarderi Franks, was false ; the facts were maa thus far, • small piece of silver anti /ace (but no stocking) was taken by this little girl (as statrri by Mr. K.) and put into her box, when she kept her dolls. The parties went before the Magistrate, and after the charge had been dismissed, the mother was again called in, and cautioned to take care that the !Indiana did not beat her daughter for this fault. These were new ail the filets which lie (the At ,:ey General) could lay before their Lordships. He could show that Mr. K.'. conduct was open to much more observation. Mr. Hu itg EY chaerred, that all that was now taking place had no reference to the libel complaiiied of by Mr. Kemick. The LOIID CIIIEF JUSTICE 11104 here was t statement of what had been published in the Niaossford News, in a letter relating to one Franks. and throwing reflection% upon his citaratter, which ee!...tinly, if written by Mr. Kenrick, seemed to require some answer. Mr. Or n x CY r.oll.nit!ed to their Lordships, that the letter dated in September ST4 not a justification of the libel, on the part of the defendant, pithlished in August. I'he LORD Cittxr JUSTICE—The question is not whether this 4 a justification or riot; but whether the party, instead of re ferring tha matter wholly to this Court, thinks lit to take it to a certain stage in another manner. The question was, whether • person so corducting Minster, can come into Court to ask our inte•fmnce ? The LOIRD CHIME JUSTICE, having consulted a few minutes with the othirJuddes„ said—We are all of opinion, that a person who means to apply to this Court is to rely on this Court wholly, and is not, in the mean time, to adopt a course of vindication through the medium of the public preys. and in that vindication to take an *Door:unity of casting aspersions upon the characters( f other indi viduals. We therefore think the rule should be dismissed. The ATTORNEY dratted with costs. The I,oaD Ciascr JUSTICE—No, the case has not been fully heard. Mr. SCAT LETT begged to point ant certain passages in one of the affidavits. which would elplain away some of the proceedings iu Mr. Kenrick's affidavit. as a reason why costs should be granted. The COMMON SEHGEANT begged to be allowed to state some conablerazions which made it imperious on the Court to grant costs for the sake of public effect. Tbc I‘OllH en es' .Imirricg said. the ease must then be fully heard; '-tTne ground on which the Court refused costs was that the libeladompkained of in the Mornieg Chrouirk went beyond the caw df Franke. 'Me: lienwortest begged to say that the affidavits of Mr. Ken rick, in the application for this rule, went also aura the question before the Court, and therefore coats ought to be allowed. Mr. Avronar v-Oxirc.a at. (having spoken with his client) sail, they waived the question of ousts.—Rule discharged. DOE EX TiEH. —n. HUNT. On a former day Mr. Henry Hunt obtained a rule, calling on the lessor of the plaintiff to show cause why the proceedings in this action of ejectment should not be set aside for irregularity, with costs. The irregularity complained of was, that the plaintiff had served the declaration on a person by the name of Ward. who was only a servant of the defendant, whereas the law required that it should be served on the tenant in possession. Mr. Costr or now showed cause against the rule, and stated, that his affidavits went to show that although the declaration was net actually served on the defendant. yet he had knowledge of it in sufficient time to enable him to appear and defend his title. The affidavits also made it appear that Mr. Hunt had obtained panes sion in dereliction of the original contract made with the chief land lord of the premises, being No. 8. Pall-mall. Mr. Hunt replied, that it was laid down in all the books that he had been able to consult, that the service on any oilier person than the tenant in possession was not good. The Learned Gentleman had argued his case upon the principle that he (Mr. Hunt) was not a legal tenant, but he did not say that he was not tenant defarro. The COVIIT said, this was the first time that an application had been made for a stay of proceedings in ejectment upon the ground of irregularity, merely without any 'injury being shown to have accrued to the party applying. But they would not say that he had no right to do so. They therefore made the rule abolute, but with out coats. :dr. Hunt—Very well, my Lord, I am perfectly satisfied. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, IVESTNINSTER, FEE. 7. (Sittings its Banco.) ECHOES V. CHAPMAN AND ANOTHER. This was an action of assault and false imprisonment. brought under the following circumstances :—The defendant Chapman missed a horse from his field, and found it in the plaintiff's stables, and believing it to have been stolen, ordered the other defendant, a constable, to lake the plaintiff into custody. He nude a eigorous resistance, but was eventually secured and conveyed before. a Police Magistrate, where, upon examination, he was found perfectly free from guilt, mud was discharged. lie then brought his action against the defendants, who put in a special plea, that Chapman having a horse taken from his field, and finding it in the plaintiff's posscsaion, believed him to have stolen it, and in consequence he was taken into custody. To this plea plaintiff demurred, and the demurrer never came on to be argued. The Cot:ay, lifier having heard the arguments of Mr. Sergeant Varcitax for the demurrer, and Mr. Sergeant Causs on the other side, were of opinion, that a plea to be good must be good altogether, of bad altogether, and as the defendants were joined in this action, it must defend both or neither. This plea did not exonerate Chapman. it was therefore bad. Judgment for plaintiff. PREROGATIVE COURT, MONDAY, FED. 7. (11Pfure Sir lorisr lkircHim., Ent.) ROLLS AND OTHERS V. ROLLS. Dr. ADDAMS said, an allegation was O&M' to the Court for the purpose of obtaining its opinion as to the effect of certain alter ations which the deceased had made in his will with pencil. The deceased bad, long previous to his death, intimated his intention to several persons of altering his will, and he did so alter it. The Learned Counsel prayed, under these circumstances, for probate on the will as altered by the deceased. 1)r. JENNER opposed the allegation. The will was of consider able length, bearing date in the year 1815, and was regularly and formally executed. The deceased died suddenly in July, 1824, having the will in his own possession until then, when it was found that several pencil marks were on the face of it which seemed to alter the original legacies. There was a legacy to John Rolls, his nephew, of 500/., which, with a pencil, was altered to 1,0001. ; to Samna Sara 501., which, by the same method, was increased to 100/. and to his widow the sum of 8.0001. which was increased to 9.0041.; these alterations were pleaded to be in the deceased's hand writing. Now in order to raise any question as to the validity of those alterations, it became necewsaiy to plead certain collateral cir cumstance' to show the deceased's intentions to effect them ; it was therefore pleaded, that the deceased had expressed great affection for the persons whose legacies hail been augmented, and had de clared to his wife in December, 1823, his intention to alter his will. and make a greater provision for his nephews and nieces ; and that he then wrote something with his pencil. Those alterations, Dr. Jenner contended, wire not the deceased's intentions completed ; they must be taken scan intention to dosomething—but. not having a fixed and determined mind, he did not conclude his testamentary intentions. This was a regularly-attested will, and it was most I unlikely that the deceased would have made those alterations with an intention to give effect to them as they then stood. The be quest of B.OOW. to his wife occurred three times in the course of the a ill, and yet the alteration to 0.000/. occurred only once. Looking at the whole of the alterations, it was impossible the Court mold give effect to those alterations. imperfect as they were, with the (01 knowledge that the deceased lived seven months afterwards, during which he might have formally fulfilled his intentions if he bad been so inclined. 1)r. LUS!IIVGTON followed on the manse side, and contended that the alterations were a mere deliberative act, and although they might show that the deceased wished to make further provisions for some of the parties, yet hehad not accomplished all his testamentary intentions. Dr. ADDAMS replied on behalf of the allegation propounding the will with the alterations, and contended that it was evident the de. ceased did wish to make some further disposition of his pro perty in favour of his relative+, and although he lived for seven months afterwards, be was suddenly seized with death before he had completed them. De. JESSE ADAMS followed Dr. Addams. Sir J. ?'tenor. said, the case first came before him in the shape of a motion, praying for probate on the will, with the pencil marks, but he had thought proper to put the party on the proof of the de ceased's intentions, and his opinion ?as not now altered---that the deceased did not intend those alterations to be a complete and full testamentary disposition of his property. On the face of the will there were a variety of marks, which denoted more the appearance of a person taking up his wia and making some memorandums which occurred to him at the time, with an intention probably, at some future time, of making more formal alterations, but what the effect of his ultimate disposition might have been there was no ar riving at. Besides the alterations alluded to in the allegation, Otte were several others which bore similar appearances, and many words and names were underseured; as if they were inert meow+ random*. He would be doing a great injustice to the g octal prin ciples of the Court if he were to admit such an allegation under those circumetencee, and he therefore declared probate of the will in its original state, and decreed the costs to be defrayed out of the estate. The Lord Mayor of Dublin has been appointed a Justice of the Peace for the County of Dublin. On Saturday evening, as early as six o'clock, Mr. Crab tree, of Colston Bassett, Notengliamshire, was stopped by two men, who threw a rope ovi r his horse's head, which immediately slipped from the horse on to Mr. Crabtree, and catching him round the neck, dragged him off, and nearly strangled him. They then tied his hands and feet, and robbed him of upwards of P 201., after which they threw him into a ditch, where he was found by his ser vant. On Sunday night last the Clonneheige schcol-house, county iVestmeatii, was maliciously entered by some un known miscreants, the windows broken, and the books and every other article in the school, consisting of several copies of the New Testament, &c. were carried mit, and destroyed oo the road.—lrisA lper. THE BRITISH PRESS. • POUCH. MANSION-HOUSE. John anti Iler'ry Guseoiznr, brothers, were charged with having broken into the warehouse of Mr. Okey, of london-wall, hat-ma nufacturer, and stolen a vast number of hats. The prisoners were remanded fur further examination. BOW STREET. Yesterday morning, during the progress of the usual business, a young gentleman presented himself before Mr. HA I. t.s, and said, that he had to apply for the is erierence of the Magistrate, to pro tect him from the threatened vengeance of 111 r. Elliston, the Ma nager of Diury.lane Theatre, whose ire tic had had the misfortune to rouse. Ills name, he said, was Webb, and he was by prMeision a surgeon, and at the time when the trial and execution of Thurtell, for murder, excited so much of the public attention, and so much was said upon the subject of Phrenology, he wrote a farce. which he called The Phrenologist, and submitted it to the inspection of Mr. Elliston, that be might bring it out if he approved of it. After waiting a loag time in suspense, and making many applizatiens upon th subj ect, subect, he was tat he might have his farce if he called at .%1 r. Ellistons house. He did an ; and, as if the simple rejection of his hide Old was not sufficiently. mortifying, it was handed to him by a servant girl, who performed the task with an ili.sup pressed giggle. Since the agitation of Mr. Kean'a affair, a letter had appeared in the Morning s Posl, under the signature of " X. Y. Z.," containing some strictures on the conduct of that actor, to which he (the applicant) thought proper to tdy, and he wrote under hie own proper signature to the Editor of that Paper. In that letter sonic remarks, certainly of no very flattering descrip tion, were introduced, upon the conduct of Mr. Elliman in his ma nagerial capacity,and the consequence had been, that the manager had written a letter to him (sent by the Twopenny Post, and not nailed—certainly • very gentlemanly mode of doing things), which applicant thought contained a threat of personal violence. lie wished. therefore, if the Magistrate put the same ciinstruction upon the words that he did, that a warrant should issue. " Not (said the applicant) that I ins -druid of Mr. Elliston—l wish that to 1* understood,—but I am about to write mime articles to expose the cant and hypocrisy of the age, particularly as displayed in P%clia. meat, I would not wish to be subject to the risk of ruolestatioo ; anti. moreover, I wish to begin with clean hands." Mr. H•Lr.e, having read the letter, said, Ido not think you have any thing to tear from this, Si-. Mr. Melon says, 'lf you persist in this course, I shall visit you with such a portion of my resentment as, upon Inquiry, I may find you merit.' Now, you may depend on it he means nothing more than managerial resent ment, which certainly may be very awful, but does nut imply per. 'tonal violence. Ile will use his thunder, no doubt, but that will be alL^ Mr. Webb—SVell, Sir, if you are of that opinion I am for the present satisfied, and if any thing happens 1 must use my stick, which I can do pretty dexterously. (The applicant had a stick of no mean size and weight with hint.) Mr. HALLS—But you will be in the wrong if you use your stick. Mr. Webb—What, Sir, if he begins? Mr. H A1.1.3-11e will not begin, I dare say. Ile will confine himself to thunder, I have no doubt; but if he should shout the bat why you can come here, and a warrant will of cour►e be granted. Mr. Webb expressed himself satisfied, and folding up his letter, he retired. Ilarris, alias Long Ned, who was for a considerable time under si:ntence of death in Hertford Gaol, in consequence of hay. lag been convicted of a burglary in the house of Lord Cowper's steward, but was subsequently pardoned, was brought up on a peace -warrant, charged by a smartly-dressed little woman, named Debley, with threatening to murder her. The complainant stated, that she had once lived with him, and that since his release front Hertford Gaol he was constantly follnw ing her about, and swearing that he would never rest until he found an opportunity of sending her to another world. On Friday last he took out a knife, and threatened to cut her head from her shoulders. Barris, in his defence, said that he had lived fourteen years with this woman, and was the father of several children by her, and in return for the kindness which he had always shown her, she had tried every means in her power to get hint hanged for the Hertford business, though she knew he was innocent. She even endeavoured to persuade his own child to withhold an important piece of testimony in his behalf. Complainant-1 only tried to make him speak the truth. Harris said she had sold or pawned every thing he had while he was in prison, and he went after her merely in the hope of getting them back. He was held to bail. UNION-HALL. . _ _ Yesterday John Portsmouth, a parish watchman, specially ap pointed to act as night guardian of a burial ground on the Kent. road, together with two other men, named Daniel Pierre and Wit. liens Pierce, were brought before the Presiding Magistrate, R. J. CITAMVERS. Esq. charged, in conjunction, with stealing the bodies of two male adults, and two female children, on the pre ceding night. The three defendants strongly protested their innocence, the two Pierces declaring that they had not been in the church-yard on the night mentioned, and only went into the lodge to have a nap. Portsmouth, the faithful guardian of the burial-ground, said, that he had been stationed to watch over the dead fur the last three years, and he could safely say this was the first time the ground over which he was placed had been opened by body snatchers." The Magistrate said, that there was not the slightest doubt but the three defendants were partners in the abominable trade of sell ing dead bodies, and accordingly held them to bail to appear at the Sessions, in the sum of 401. each. The bail not being procured, the defendants were sent to prison. AFFLICTING ACCIDENT. In the British Press of Saturday we published an ac count of the dreadful calamity which took place in the county Fermanagh. The following more minute report is from the Enniakdlen Pucka of Thursday : We have seldom had a task of so distressing a nature as that which this day devolves upon us, in recording the melancholy fate of several fellow -creatures, who perished on Saturday last. A young man of excellent moral character, named Maguire, died in this town on Thursday, and a number of his acquaintances and friends, anxious to testify their respect far his remains, assembled to convey them to the place of interment, at the Old Abbey, in the Wanda Devonish. The funeral proceeded by land to the shore opposite the island, in the landa of Derryinch, where they arrived about one o'clock. Although the day became stormy, the vessels destined to convey them across, were crowded and overladen, par ticularly a cot in which the corpse was deposited, the management of which was entrusted to persons not sufficiently skilled. After clearing out from the shelter of a point of land, the wind blowing very strong, the lake was greatly agitated, and it was necessary to heid the cot to the wind, until approaching a certain point at which they were to turn and run in for shore. One of the rower at this crisis failing, missed his stroke, by which the vessel was turned with her side to the wind, and the waves broke in upon her. This so alarmed all on board, that a general agitation ensued, particu larly among the females, some of whom, together with the man act ing as pilot, are said to have fainted. The cot instantly tiiled with water, and went down, and of nearly fifty persons on board, half that number, it Is supposed, perished. A scene so truly appalling can scarce be described ; husbands, wives, parents, and children on the shore ; and in another vessel (that, too, struggling in the storm, and unable to afford relief to the sufferers,) beholding in despair and distraction all that was dear to them sinking into death, and leaving only a bonnet, a shawl, a mantle, or a hat, on the surface of the water, to mark their melancholy-fate. Some wereseen clinging to an oar, or grasping at a coffin containing the corpse, which floated of; while others who could swim were heard to cry out most piteously in the name of all that is merciful, to be released from the gripe of those, who, in the agony of death, were clinging to them and forcing them to the bottom. What adds further pain to this afflicting calamity is. that it occurred within a few perches of the land, and perhaps not two from where a footing could be had. Seventeen or eighteen of the bodies have been found, and some are yet missing. During the remainder of Saturday, and the entire of Sunday and Monday, the town and neighbourhood ex hibited a scene of the greatest anxiety and alarm, as the different bodies were brought in to their respective families, or removed for interment. It was particularly affecting to see tne mother and daughter in two instances stretched on the same bed, and conveyed together to the sante grave t the spectacle also of seven of them on the street together on Monday, and the crowds assembled to ac company then, to their last abode, was melancholy beyond de scription. Of our respectable townsman, Mr. Richard Bail, we are unable to speak in terms of adequate praise; his humanity and benevo lence in relieving the persons who escaped, many of whom went greatly exhausted, and in danger of sinking under the effects of fa tigue and fright, and his unrelaxed endeavours to recover the dead bodies, though suffering himself from extreme cold and wet, are beyond any commendation we can bestow. The consciousness of his generous and feeling conduct, on this, as on many other occa sions, and the prayers and gratitude of those for whom he so laud ably exerted himself, will be his best reward. The attention and humanity of Mr. Ranlrin's family, in providing every comfort for the sufferers, are also deserving of particular praise. Mr. Edward Rester, too, and tunny others, manifested the greatest - humanity on the occasion. the following ars the names of the persons whose bodies hare ken found z Crcily Alagutre, Alice Tulle. Anne Carroll, Edward Sweeny, Elizabeth Coyle, Elizabeth Campbell, Bridget 51•3lanus. Marga ret Early. Elizabeth Keon, Philip 111`Manus, Mary Freeman, Bernard 1111'Caffry, Coreniok Maguire, Jane Maguire, Catherine Murphy, James Duncan, and James M`Caftly. An inquest was held on the above bodies, by Mr. Wm. Trotter, and a verdict given of--" Accidental Drowning." A circumstance connected in some degree with the above accident occurred on Tuesday last, which had nearly proved of se rious consequence. In the island of Devonish, a barn, used by Mr. Rankin for the necessary operations in saving the produce of the land, a hich was given for the temporary accommodation of the pusuns sho escaped drowning, and also for the occasional refresh. meat of the boatmen engaged in searching for the dead bodies, was accidentally set On fire, and consumed, together with a quantity of straw, which it contained. Front the strenuous exertions of Mr. Richard Ball, the persons engaged with him in looking for the dead, and others in Mr. Rankin's employment, avaluable haggard was saved from destruction. The Botanical and Horticultural Society of Northum berland, Durham, and Nes:cystic, has received a donation of VOL from T. W. Beaumont, Esq. M.P. 1 MURDER OF A MAN BY HIS WIFE. MARLDOR01:011-STRETT.—Yesterday vast crowds of persons assembled about the office, in consequence of a woman, named Jane Mips's, having been brought from the watch house of St. Giles's (where the had been confined sir.ce one o'clock on Sunday morn ing) for examination on the charge of the wilful murder of her hus band, Joseph Karen. At about tan o clock, the unhappy woman was placed at the bar, before Sir G. Faun ANT and J. E. Co NADI r, Esq. the Magistrates. Site seemed to be quite sensible of the enormity of the dreadful crime fur which she had been arrested, and during the exami nation she sobbed loudly, and at intervals ejaculated, " Oh God! what have I done"—" I have killed a good husband?"—" Ile would have lived had they not let him hieeu so much." The first witness examined was Thomas Moore, who stated that he lived opposite the house occupied by the prisoner and her late husband, at No. 6, Lascelles-court, Broad-street, St. Giles's. About half past twelve o'clock, on Saturday night, the prisoner came rurin'ng into his room ai.d fell on her knees before the fire; she seemed dreadfully frightened, and said to witness, •• For God's sake go and try and pacify my husband, for he is in a great pas sion, and we have had some words." Witness went, and knocked two or three times at the door, but received no answer ; he therefore opened the door and looked round the room, but could not see the deceased ; lie instantly returned home. and told the prisoner her husband was not there ; upon which she requested witness's wife I to go m ; she did so. and presently came running in, saying, she had found him, and that he was dying ; witness then went back to the house and found hi.n lying on the fluor, near the fire-place, I with his head amongst the coals in the cupboard, and deluged iu blood. At this inoment, witness's wife and the prisoner came in witness said to the prisoner. "You have murdered your husband ;" ' she said, agitatedly, " Is he dead?" and seemed very sorry; wit ness left them in the room, and he rim to Mr. Hill, the surgeon, in High street, and to Mr. Jones, in Broad-street, but could get no assistance. He returned again and then gave an alarm, and the prisoner was taken to the watchhouse. There was a long hair broom lying near the deceased, broken to pieces, and the brush part of it was covered with blood, and with some human hair at cached to it. There was also a small fire-shovel covered with blood, but the prisoner told witness she had killed him with the tuft-er.d of the hair-brcotn. Nyright, the beadle of St. Giles's, stated, that he was in the watchhouse vrlien the prisoner was brought in by the watchman. She said she had killed her husband with the hair .broom, and that he was a good man to her. Witness asked if a doctor had been sent for, and was told that some person had applied to the work house for the assistance of Mr. Burgess, the parish surgeon, but that it could not be obtained. Witness instantly proceeded to the deceased, and found hint lying as above stated, but still alive; his heart beat, and pulsation had hot entirely ceased. NVitness think ing if immediate assistance was at hand his life might he saved, instantly went to the workhouse himself, and applied to the porter stationed at the door to see Mr. Burgess. The porter said he could not be seen—he was ill in bed. Witness told him that a man had been nearly murdered, but that there were signs of life, and Mr. Burgess's assistance might restore him. The porter said he could not go to him; it was more than he dared do. Witness then said. " I insist upon seeing Mr. Starkey, Mr. Burgess's assistant." Upon which he was shown into Mr. Starkey's room • he was in bed, and witness made the case known to him ; he said, " To tell you the truth, Wrigttt, I am very ill myself, and I won't endanger my life by leaving my room for anybody." Witness then asked Mr. Starkey if he could see Mr. Burgess, for in all probability the man would live if he was properly attended to. Starkey said, " Mr. Burgess has rolling whatever to do with out-door busi ness." %Tittless finding he could get no assistance at the work house returned to the deceased again, and found him still alive, and witness thought he perceived one of his eyes move. Another beadle, named Beach. ran to Mr. Ireland, the surgeon. in Hart street, Bloomsbury, and shortly returned with Mr. Webb. Mr. Ireland's Assistant, but it was then too late, for the unfortunate man had breathed his last.—(Here the unhappy woman cried bit terly, and was so extremely exhausted that the Magistrate ordered her a chair.)—Witness received a broken hair broom, n tire-shovel, and a poker, from a watchman in the room, which he now pro duced. It was evident that the broom was the weapon that had been used, and whit very considerable force, for the handle was broken in three pieces, and the head of It was covered with blood., and human hair was visible on several parts of it. There was a dreadful wound at the back of the deceased's skull, penetrating to the brain. Air. CONANT—How long a period elapsed from the time you applied at the workhouse for medical assistance and the time Mr. V. ebb, Mr. Ireland's assistant, arrived ? Witness--It was nearly an hour, Sir. I did every thing in my power to obtain the usistance of Mr. Burgess, or of his assistant. Mr. Starkey. Mr. COXANT—It is most disgraceful conduct of the parish Doctor and his Assistant; here are two men, who arc paid by the parish, and when called upon in a case of life and death (very dif ferent from ordinary cases), they actually refuse to attend ! Such men are unfit far their situations. Mr. Erle, the Vestry Clerk of the parish, entered at this mo ment, and said, that he would wish it to be distinctly understood that Mr. Burgess knew nothing whatever of the business till nine o'clock that morning, and therefore there could be no blame at tached to that gentleman. Mr. CONANT—What is,your opinion of Mr. Starkey's conduct ? He said, when asked by Wright, the beadle, if Mr. Burgess could attend, that Mr. Burgess never attended to any out-door business. Now, what right had he, by such an observation, to endeavour to deter Wright from making application to Mr. Burgess? Mr. Erle —I have nothing es say about Mr. Starkey's conduct ; I only know that he is very ill, and that he employs a person to do his business, who lives at the corner of Poland-sueet, Oxford. road. Sir 6. FARBANT-1 think that the parish ought to see that if the Assistant, who must be in attendance in the workhouse, is un well, that. his deputy be there also, or near the spot, and not so far off as Poland-street. _ _ Mr. Erle said, he only came to exonerate Mr. Burgess from any censure, as that gentleman knew bou.;ng of the matter. Mr. Webb was next examined. He stated that he was Assistant to Mr. Ireland, surgeon, in Hart-street, Bloomsbury. Lie was called to attend the deceased , ' and found him quite dead. There was:- wound in the superior right parietal bone of tliz head, about three inches in length, and of great depth. Witness considered the wound wan inflicted with an edged instrument, but could not say that the head of a broom would produce such a wound. The wound on the head was the cause of death. Surzeman, the watchhouse-keeper. "was next examined. He stated, that the prisoner, on seeing him at the watchhouse, said, `• hlr. Furzenian, you know me, and you knew my poor husband ; he was the best husband in the world." Witness asked her what caused the quarrel between them? She then said, " that she and her husbard went down Drury-lane to buy a little meat for supper, and on their return he wanted to take home Another pot of porter. She objected, but he insisted on doing so, and he took a pot home with him. She cooked the meat, and whilst they were at supper he began to play tricks and joke with her; and, because she eats angry with him, he struck her on the nose, which caused it to Deed ; she then took up the broom and gave him the blow." Sir D. FASCIST—Did she say how many blows she bad struck him ? Furseman answered in the negative. The prisoner was then desired to stand up ; ehe was assisted to the front of the bar by Illarsden, the gaoler. To questions from Sir George Farrant, she said she was a native of Ireland, but had been brought up at Manchester. She had been married to the de. ceased about three years, but had no family. Sir G. r4RITAN T—l am going to send you to prison till Thurs day next ; you will go to the House of Correction. The unhappy woman, in tears, said that no punishment wu too great for her. She had killed a good husband, and she could never look at any of her friends ag ain. She was then remanded for further examination to Thursday next. CORONER'S INQUEST. MELANCHOLY CHICUNSTANCE.—ON Tuesday last an In quest was held at !Manchester, on the body of Alice Gregory, aged nineteen, who died in consequence of swallowing a quantity of verdigris. From the evidence of the unfortunate parent of the deceased, it appeared that about twelve months ago she formed an acquaint ance with some young man, which ended in disappointment. About eleven weeks since she formed another attachment, of which he very much disapproved, and in consequence of the young man persisting in his addresses he forbade hilt) the house, and desired the deceased to have nothing more to say to him. The young man, however, still persisted, and the deceased still encouraged, and at length she was sent to the house of her brother, in Manchester, when she gradually lost her health, became very pale and thin, and ultimately sank into a sort of despondency, accompanied with ccca sional mental detangement. Walter Barton Stott, surgeon, stated, that about half-past one nu blonday he visited the deceased, and on examination discovered her to be dead. A woman who was in the room told him that the deceased had swallowed verdigris, and produced to him a Lason into which she had recently vomited, which at once confirmed her testimony. - 111 r. Jordan soon after arrived with a stomach pump, but it was too late. The deceased, it appeared, took the verdigris about eleven o'clock, and died soon after one. The Jury returned the following verdict—" That the deceased died by taking and swallowing down a quantity of verdigris, when in a state of mental derangement."—Sliwkport Advertiser. An " Hibernian Patent Steam Washing Company" has been started at Dublin. There has hitherto no further light been thrown on the robbery of the toll-man at fadbury gate. Last Saturday a constable of Aylesbury, with the turnkey of the county gaol, proceeded on a supposed scent for the detection of the parties concerned ; but they returned on Monday evening unsuccessful. It was reported, at the beginning of the week, that the toll collector had, in consequence of the shock he had suffered from the outrage of the robbers, been induced to resign bis situation; but the rumour, it appears, is unfounded. Relative to the occasion of the murder on Whadd.m Chase, no elucidation has been obtained. Lynn continues in a tranquil state. His friends, it is reported, intend to urge the plea of lunacy in his defence.—Bucks Chroni,lr. Boilers MARKETS. CORN EXCHANGE, MONDAY, Fes. 7. We had a good supply of Grain in general during last week, with AA extensive arrival of Flour. The supply fresh up this morning W land-carriage samples was not very abundant, in consequence of Olich rather higher prices were obtained for the best runs of Wheat, but no improvement of prices in inferior samples can be wood ; indeed the sale of such was very heavy. The average ore of Barley, for the fourth seek, being only 311 s. 9d. per quarter, added to the fact of the returns in the country i districts for the fol 'lowing week being at very los prices, makes t next to impossible that the ports can open this month • in consequence of which, all descriptions of English Barley were i n demanef both on Friday and to-day, and the advance on the currency of this day week is 4s. to Bs. per quarter. There was a pretty good sale for Oats, and priors of last Monday were fully supported. Old Beans were dearer, but in prices of new ores, or Grey Peas, there was no rnatcrial varia tion. We had more inquiry for White Peas, and fine Boilers were 21 per quarter dearer. Linseed ar s d Rapeseed very dull. We had nothMg whatever doing in Grain under Lock. :en E•T. 'ULT. Kent rind Esse:. ( red) 61s to 74* Essex 00* to 86,4 Do. (white) - 61 s to 76* Ditto, b r o w n . 301 to 58s Suffolk (red) Ills to 741 Suffolk & Norfolk 60s to 70s Ditto ( white) . 6ls to 73s Ditto, brown -50 s to 60* Norfolk and Liecoln. DEAN X. shire (red) Gls to 72* English -28 s to 30s Irish 36a to 62* Foreign -26 s to 34* Rale - 36* to 40s LINSEED. JAE EY. English . 441 to 48s Malting - 40* to 50. Foreign 861 to 40s Grinding -34 s to Nis lIESIPSZED. OATS. English (per qr.) 40s to 44s Feed, Essex & Kent 22s to 28* Foreign 425 to 44s Lincolnshire 22s to 27s T•RES. Yorkshire 22s to 26, English (per qr.) 30s to des Irish white 50* to 21s Ditto, new - 480 to 56i Ditto black 21s to 23s Foreign . 34s to 3fes Poland, Lincolnshire 23s to Tax Ditto, new . 40s to 44a Yorkshire -22 s to 27% SEEDS, Potato, Lincolnshire 24a to 30* Rapeseed (pe r l as t) 261 to 281 Yorkshire vs to 29, . 1 51 ustardseed (brown) Srotch . 26* to $2B ' per bushel . 12/ to 131 - Irish -23 s to 27s Ditto, white . 9$ to 111 ISEASrS. Clover, red (per cwt.) 431 to 841 Ticks, new - 36. to 4651 Ditto, white . 401 to 761 Ditto, old Trefoil 201 to 261 Pigeon Ditto, old Hog Map.le 4lh to 54: 41h to 46s .s;'s to 60a PEAS. 34s to 3ets - - 37% to 38s 424 to 46s 48s to 5b GUI LIIPF( Wheat per I. 141 Os to 510 i Os Old ditto - tN Oh to 01 Oh Oats per qr. I/ Is to I/ Its Old ditto . al Oh tl 01 Os HERTIa Wheat, per load of five bushels - 44 to Us Sew —s to —s Barley, per qr. - 3.11 to .55s Coriander - 81 to 101 Curaway 40i to 401 OIL CAKES. Rapeseed (per ton) 61 to 01 Lioseed (ditto) 81 to 01 IRD Fzs 6 . _ Rye - 01 Os to 01 Os Barley - I4s to 21 94 Ikans . 21 Os to 21 los Grey Peas . 21 2s to 21 8s _—. Beans, per load 25s to Lis Pea; . 23i to 2E* Rye Tafel -21 rs to 35* PRICE OF FLOUR. Torn Made, per sack Os to 84s Norfolk and Stockton 451 to 50s Seconds - 651 to Rs Bran, per qr. . Its to Its Essex and Suffolk, on Pollard, Fine -14 s to 18s board ship - 50 s to Us PRICE OF BREAD. The highest Price of Bread in the 3letropolis is I Id. for the four-pound Loaf. There are others who se❑ from a halfpenny is three halfpence below that rate. SMITHFIELD, MONDAY, FEB. 7. We are not so bri k to-day in the sales of Beef. but the differ. ence of p rice , if any, for th e b es t qua li t i es , i s so tr ifli ng t h at we do not feel justified in quoting lower figures than last Monday. The ordinary sorts however go off heavily, at a reduction of 4d. pet stone. There is a considerable increase in the supply of Mutton, which has experienced a fall of 2d. per stone. e hare more Calves here to-day, and see may fairly say, with the exception at a very few choice onss, that 6s. &I. is a fair quotation fur the best at market. Pork continues without altetttion. Beef - 3s 4d to 5s fkl Veal Mutton - 5s 4d to 5s 6d I Pork 5s Cd to Gs 8,1 4s Ott to 5s titi lII'AD OF CATTLE TATS DAY: - Beasts, 2,013 I Sheep, 19,090 I Calves, 129 I Pigs, ICU. HAY-MARKET. Hay (Old) - 41 10. 0.1 to al Os Od New Inferior . 31 Os Oil to 41 0. 01 Clover (Old) -4! las Od to 61 IA 01 Ditto (Inferior) - 41 Os Oil to 41 les Od Straw . - 21 Os Od to 21 k 01 NEIVGATE AND LEADENHALL—(II7 the Carcase). Reef -as 84 to 4s Ott Veal . tis 4d to Os Od lllutton . Es 44 to 4s Id I Pork - 3s 4d to 5s PRICE eiIIOTATOEB, Fan. 7. Potatoes 31 ljs id to it Os Od per Ton. Yorkshire Kidney. di lOs Od to id Os Od ditto. PR ICES 01F ST. JAMES'S. WAND STRAW. WHITECIIAPFL. Hay - 6 - 5;0( . 1 to 105 s Od Ditto (New) —$ Od to —a Od (lover . 80s Od to 105 s Od Straw -37 s 6d to 4ds Od Hay - to 100 a 04 Inferior - tki to —a Od Clover . 803 Od to 115 s Od Straw -40 s 041 to 41:s Od PRIZE OF HOPS. per Cwt. FEB. 7. Pootvrs. BAGS. Kcnt . 61 63 to 81 On Kent - 51 15s to 71 71 Sussex . 6/ Os to 6/ 163 Sussex - 51 128 to 61 4. Esse: . 61 6u to 7/ 100 Essex -6/ 15s to 6I 15s Farnham, fine 101 Os to 12: 128—Seconds 91 Os to 191 Os PRICE OF RAW FAT, per Stone of Blb. Pries by Tallow (as stated by the Tallow Melters), 2s Sid PRICE OF TALLOW SOAP, &e. per 11216. Town Tallow - bls Od Yellow Soap -74 s 6d Yellow Ilus.,ta . . 41s Od Mottled -82 s Od White ditto -40 s OJ Curd -86 s Od Soap ditto . 39s Od Graves - Itls ea Melting Stuff . 32s Od Good Deep - 6s Od Ditto Rough - Ills Od SHEEP SKINS. Polled, 6s Od to 101 Od ! Sheep, Os Od I Downs, Ss Od to Ss fid Fells, Os Od to Os Od I Itsinbs, Os Od to Os Od PRICE OF LEATHER, per lb. Butts, 50 to 561bs - - -19 d to 20d Ditto. 56 to 661bs - . -22 d to 23d Dressing Hides - - - -15 d to 19d • Fins Coach Hides . -19 d to 214 Light Crop Hides, for Cutting, 35 to 401bs . 151 d to 174 Ditto, 45 to 501bs - - - -17. d to I9Ad Calf Skins, 36 to 401bs - - 224 to 90d Ditto, 50 to 701bs - - - . 244 to 284 Ditto, 70 to 901bs - - - -22 d to 25d Small Seals (Greenland) - - -17 d to 104 Large Ditto - - - -16 d to 104 Tanned Horse Hides - - -19 d to 104 Spanish Horse Hides - - - 14‘1 to 21d COAL MARKET, FRB. 7. Shirt at Market. Ships Sold. 95i Newra , tle . . 41 - 3Os Od to 38s 04 37 Sunderland - 191 -29 s Od to 40s ad INSOLVENT DEBTORS. PETITIONS TO BE HEMS') AT THE COURT, IN PORTUGAL. STREET, LINCOLN'S twx-riti.ns, PENA% AT NINE. Benham, J. Woodstock, Oxford, glover. Barden, J. Chippenham, Wiltshire, dyer. ('taper, G. Fore-street, tobacconist Chapman, C. Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, auctioneer. Cooper, W. Mount-street, Bethnal-green, dealer in marine stores. Maynard, T. Chertsey, Surrey. coal-merchant. Oaks, T. B. (Iloueester.atreet, Commercial-road, brazier. Pudden, J. Belvidere.row, Great Suffolk•street, butcher. Ravenhill, R. London-wall, cabinet-maker. Stammers, J. Lewisham, Kent, corn.dealer. Al'hiteway, W. Duke-street, Commercial-road, labourer. Weaver, J. Lamb's Conduit-street, deputy purveyor to his Ma. jest y's forces. Welch, J. Staplegate, Kent, whiting manufacturer. Webb, T. Longpoet, Kent, baker. MARRIED. On the ♦th instil/it. in Thomas's Church, Dublin, by special licence, Dennis Keogh, Esq. of Summer-bill, youngest son of the late Laurence Keogh, Esq. of Keoghville, county of ROSCOMMOII. to Ann, eldest daughter of Bibby Hartford, of Graigue Castle, county. of Kilkenny, Esq. On the 2d instant, at Greenhorn chapel. Berko, Major Henry Bowyer bane, of the Royal Artillery. to Jane, eldest daughter of the late Archibald Thomson, ofJamaica, Esq. At Edinburgh, on the Ist instant, by the Rea. John Jameson. of Scone, James Wylie, Esq. of Airleywright, Perthshire, to Isabella, daughter of the late An3rees Patton, Esq. Glasgow. At West Kilbride, on the let inst. John IVoddroc, Dalmarnock, to 3larion, youngest daughter of Robert Esq. of Kirkland. DIED. On the 24th ult. at Clout? HO:OTe. the Right Honourable - "nay Mary Tmtter, wife of Uhllord Trotter, Esq. and d au ghter 0 : Th e Iwte Earl of llowth. HIGH WATER THIS DAY AT LONDON BRll►tik. Morning 22 min. after 4. f Afternoon 82 min. after 5. Printed at THE BRITISH PRESS Office, by J. W. CARL ox, 181, Strand, and publlshed by R. Ceatileix, same piace. I 4, v •••••• 4 1 . !: • '.ll ; ,:iiisel;onorke tl M Wolnesa S• 11. 11 1. rK 'wed tunic imp iusinaer d weir r;i7tIONAL DOMEST 11 o f go od cht x.KISF. at ply st the Ow oeJ Four. ni flOt/ N 1 1 r PICCA of the P 'CIEIRSDA t aeck precisely. immrdintelv 401.;NTV PLESEN, 110141 T. J. It UTNITED I U AkiSU it A place. Pell-meal, . e tee, and Surd <hue sad Sale Jaw: .411. Hi*ExotHency. *Right Hon. La Ktocatdir.e Si g ht lion. Lori 7,cgtoo. *Haight Hon. I gash] •ltigLl Hon. IA Lictitenw 1.. R. Drot , ghtot Ilitrry Cook, El.c •-••ir Franci%lta W. D. Fellows Ilicbird Gilbert, STAN' PI Sot Stritorwr- Peraon; Wee t featly derive 1 Ent ersenaive ul priociplca that seminally pewit ristion, partici p IZN of profits. *e Assoc-ilia Annuities sa+i•f , The Boavit.d Fridays. at elm Attendance dr and to furnish c, Art RO 'T PANY, DS HOLES Cup.' DErtlrl Sir Etrisruel John Allnuti, Seim' Birch. 1 Pail Bevan, E• John tri?rcn, John E Au DIT 011 SOLICITORS-- Britettni-111 street; hl i Amongst tilt and the @Avant: rnitirtaint d. the Entity and prci on the ground, I a frtr its OYJC , lolis with c pu b► pirate and and benefit of that the action) in the quality Thousand Per, takings of the those who bec th , preference Doing the feted and arno the tester U‘Pii f o 'Sr ff