The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1808-03-05 00:00:00

what was the nature of the clause the Ml4e Lord intended to introduce into the Mutiny Bill, but the answer was such as we could not collect. PETITION AGAINST THE ORDERS IN COUNCIL.. ►Mr. TICIINZY said, he held in his hand a Peti tion, signed by four of the most respectable Liver pool merchants, whose names were amongst those who had signed the ono, winch, on account of some informality, had been rejected by the House last night. The fornserpetition was thought to be com pla►ning alone of duties to be imposed by the Bill now pending in Parliament upon the Orders of Council, but the present one desired only that the Petitioners might be heard by Counsel as to the grievances that would arise to the merchants es Liverpool, in consequence of these orders. That it had been signed by so few of those merchants, was merely owing to there not being time to trans mit it to Liverpool, and have it returned previous to the Orders of Council being carried into exe claim, and sanctioned by the House. The sub stance of the present petition was, that the Petits- . ouera understood that eertain Orders of Council, issued upon the 21st of November last, were likely to be pawed into a law, by a Bill at present de pending in Parliaiu:•nt, from which they had every reason to apprehend consequences the most inju rious to their interests. That the Petitioners did, upon tl►e tat of Mardi, truusinit a Petition against *lnd Bill; which Petition, they understood, could not be received, on account of the want of form. Rids the forms of that Honourable House the Pe titioners did not profess themselves to be conver sant, hut they were persuaded that to forms ever have been, nor could be, such as to preclude your Petitioners from being heard by Counsel against any Measure that was likely to Affect their trade. They therefore most earnestly entreated that the House would hear them, and allow them to lay evideoce before them we to the injury that was likey to alive train such Orders in Council." Mr. Tierimy then concluded with snoring, .‘ That this . Petition be laid upon the Table." The Cunscettoa of the Excereumt--0. If' I understand rightly the object of this Petition, it does, by taking usnice of the Bill at present de pending, point the objection of the Petitioners . 'gaited that Rill, tic,- very cause for which the former Petition had been thrown out. if it was not agaiiist that Bill, 1 apprehend it would have . been liecet,iury for them to state more particularly . with what view they presenter] tL. it Petition.• For these reasons, I conceive it to be nothing more than a similar Petition to that which was discussed yes terdity, for no leas than sine!' or eight hours.. It might he rely consistent with the duty and the in . terests of the Petitiuvers to arld;ess His Majesty upon such a subject, lint it is itivmosible to hem them in the House of Commons, upon a Bill of the nature of that now pending. I am sure it iv not the flight-Hon. Vientleinan a desire to embark in the mule argumeins that were used last night against the former Petition ; and, therefore, I must apprise its being laid ulnu the Table." Mr. l'tentsai—" I do not wish to renew any debate upon thissubject, lint I really thought that this Petition could not be deemed liable to the same objection as the former one. It does not proloa to be e Petition against the Bill in ques timi. They merely stated their anxiety as to those .Orders in Commit, of which they still feel mote and IMAM the oppression which that Bill was to cure into etteet. All they wished was to be heard by their Counsel at. the Bar agaiust the Orders in, Council, and therefore l think it is one that esti not be refused." Mr. Ilesaissoe—'. I conceive that this can be iinthing more than a Petition against the proceed hags um: before the linnies, and, therefore, it is ob jectionable. If the petitioners really thought these Orders iu Council to be ill adi iseil, it was open to them to petition, seep to pray the House to take measures against them, but not to petition against A Bill, which had in its view, all object of revenue. wanner, were the object of Petitioners against war, at the very time the !louse paining some Act to carry on war ; and if, in -, coming directly to their object, they were ion against the tax, suet* a petition eonld listened to, however desirous the House 1.: hear tb:nn spun the subject of pence. - e on such amends,' think the present petition is .I%reaurnva—c. I never before heard olio:Mon as that now made against this if I understand the ease right, it is Majesty has issued Orders in Council, Ow attention of the flunse and the peb been called . by His alajesty's Speech, beets referred to a Committee to take lees upria them, 'and these Petitioners bas hemiened, think they have a right . against such iiroceeilings. They say, ..itlerstand you. mean to curry these Orders ad . eis, as Isias been e eproweil is the Address to Throne, and state, that what you 'so intend to ito effect, Will he attended with total them, and will totally change the whole the country. lam not seying they that aeiertion, but can :t s:Ild that seeing t'w steps taken by this House, are to precluded from petitioning at any stage of They are. in my opinion, equidly empow so at the present moment, as if they . immediately after the voting of that .42 Hitt Majesty. What they pray is, that orders may not be carried into effect in Ay whatever. If the Hon* be 'not following up '.iress,,, these undoubtedly, there is amend of question; but if. we are following it up, we are carrying the Orders in Council execution, in some shape or other. •r you were doing it by duty, or nut, by im duty, the l'etitioners need cure not ; but desirous, before you carry that Address to show you that the Orders in Council to their ruin. If Gentlemen mean to ray l'etitimieni are not mom to he beard stet. grievances, I Imola wish to know at what y can he heard, they 'saving now rectified of their feriner Petit i 4444 , are undoubtedly have their erievences listened to ?" .'oasts Bowie I my the very ob which existed against the former Pe exists against the present one. The was signed by 400, sad the present only four merchants, and the reason fur this is, that there was put time to then' to peiiti measures agaii a Bill. which I In the manse IL to be heard as vr..re passing stead of coniii to petition ag not be listen' sight b, to 111 Upon such gr Sir Jou% .1 of anvil au 0!" Petition. if this; I lin 51:1j to which t h e lie have bet they have be some orders seeing whet h to petition ag they underata into e:reet, as the Throne. ■ (wry into e ruin to them tr4ilt of the are right in 0 they seeing t iw precluded theta ?—The: erred to do s hail done it SI addreai to Hi thew orders way whatever that address, the question then we ar into etecut • Whether you paling a duty . they are dear into effect, to will operate t that these l'et ing their Kriel staff they eel the errore of tl entitled to lia Mr. STUiti jectiou which tition. exists former was one by surly airsigucd for transmit it to Liverpool. New I would wish to know if it be a Petition against this gill why there was not time to trunumit it?' If it be against a proceeding now pending in this House, then the question came to be, whether that pros ceeding be of such a nature as to admit the Yeti • tiosrs to be heard. It was decided lust night, that its being . a Bill for the collection of certaiu duties, the Petitioners could nut be heard against it in any stage, according to former images. It dos not, however, follow, that they are taut to be heard it all. Although they cannot be heard by the House, they may be heard by the Crown; the measure complained of being an act of the Crown. To put an analogous case, let me suppose that Its Ma jesty, in his Speech from the Throue, expresses his contidence that the House will enable him vigorously to prosecute the war, and that the House had passed Bills for that purpose, 1 should like to know how Petitioners could be heard against the Property Tux, maroly upon the grounds that His-Majesty had recommended a vigorous prosecu tion of the war ? . The cute is the slime which applied to the. Orders in Council." Mr. WillTallEAD--" It is itnpossible to delay this petition a moment longer ; for if the Petitioners be foiled in this attempt, as they were in the foimer one, there would not be time for putting a petition into any form that could be admitted. The Right I lououralile Gentlemen are too sanguine of their Orders. ia Council, and it is unjust not to hear men, who thus oliCred to be heauslut the bar, as to the rnin that would inevitably follow them. Mr. WILLIAM SMITH thought that it was a good and substantial reason for pressing forward this Petition, as the Bill was to pawl that House upon Monday. He was informed by persons who had conversed with the Right Honourable the Chan cellor of the Exchequer, that he did not intend ori ginally to denominate the Bill a Revenue Bill. This was misleading the merelvauts. and prevelit ' ing them from their right of petitioniug. The CjaA lICELLOR of the Exc•coura observed, that iu all conferences he had bad with the mei chants, he told them, when they objected to the duties being too high, that that was not the chief object of the Bill, it being to carry the tinter; into execution. Dr. LiWRENCK said, he hoped the House would not be involved in such absurdity as to come to a decision, and afterwards tied theui,elves ler the .necessity of hearing evidence. It was their duty to give that degree of redress to the grievances that they could, and reject that part that was objection able on account of form. nr. ti DAM b ttppetrtrd very ably the pretensions of the petitioners, as he saw nu tios9hle objection to hearing them state their grievances at the Bar. It was bighly improper to think of tying them up from the right of petitioning against the etreits of a Bill merely bemuse there ware some revenue re gulations in it. Mr. Fot• als9 supported the Petition. Ile wished to knew whether this was to be the only Bill that was to he proposed upon these Orders, for if not there could be no objection to ratite this Petition. The SaLICITOIt.CIEWrIttf. argued against the receiving the Petition, as it was equally objuctiou able in point of form as the former one. Sir ASTlttlit P►urorr thought, that on this qner tion evidence was moat particularly necemerv, it was therefore unfair to the house even to refuse the prayer of the petitioners to he heard at the liar of the house. lle denied there was any thing equivocal in the Petition, and contended that nothing lint what was fair, correct, and orderly, had been stated in the detail. It aas in rain to say the complaint should be made to the King, since the Orders proceeded from his authority, since the House, by enacting a law on them, were now re sponsible to the country, in a measure, fur the Or ders themselves. Mr: Ilusanisox maintained, that it was now an improper time to admit the Petition as it was at present framed, and recommended the Petitioners to upplv to the House in the 11 , 1041.3 which had been propixii . ii to them by his 'tight lion. Friend. Mr. BAN MCI thought there could he no reason able objection to withdrawing the Petition at pre sent, end presenting it on Monday. Mr. Ttrent.Y said, no eloquence whatever mould persuade hill. to relinquish the pressing and imme.• &ate right of the Petition ; its merits ?toad on a broad basis. The objection now to the Bill existed as to a regulation of trade. The misfortune of the fonuer Petition's refusal was the fault of the !TOWN:. not that of the Petitioners, since the House had negketed to forward it in the usual course. The hope of the present Petitioners was, that the forms of that House might he an object of attention, )et justice a mild be paramount to all fonn, even ad mitting the forms of the House to be against it. General TARLCTON opposed the admission of the Petition, us informal rualimtgalar. Mr. S mto x coincided with the arguments of Ow Ministers, and considered it improper to admit the present Petition. - Lord SISNLEY mut several extracts from the Petition, to 'their thnt it merely complained of the ineastire as one of trade, and expressed appre. henbions of its pernicious effects ou the commercial interest. After an esphination on the part of General TAR' P. run, tliP linUie divided, when there ap peared, for receiving the l'etition, A4ce• • NIA'S II I Majority fur Ministers 54 Mr. Avast then rose, pursuant to notice. He hoped that the comlnet pursued on the adz at last February. would wirer be repeated in that Home. On the :td of Febrnary, an application to Parlia ment had beenstsde4r information relative to the intention* of Demriark towards this country : that application had bee. refused. Shortly after an other application had been male for a particular paper on the same subject, which was also refused ; thottEh the Secretary for Foreign Affairs hail, oo the Nth of the same month, when pressed by his antagoni-ts an time justilialbletiees of his rotalnel, produced a few garbled sentences from that paper, for the parpsise of cleurnmy cha racter from time ac emi.atimet allepiell against him.— Oa time Itith the Secretary of State came doom to the liouse, and of himself and for his own par poses, proposed au Address to His 3lnje.ty to grant these very papers he himself had refused before, as containing information dangerous to the State, and sabiersive of our interests abroad. Tins conduct. l►e considered not only improper, as it opened to our enemies the sources of our secret informatiOn, according .to the statement of the filinistry„ but also dangerous to our constitutional liberty, and an innovation on the proceedings of the House. These positions he supported by instances -r drawn frOm the history of Parliament Ili the year 1750, and also from tile conduct of Mr. Pitt in 1791, when he preferred resting the defence ,of some of his measures founded on secret inforroatiol, res pecting the intentions of Russia, ou the confidence the House and the nation had so constantly and deservedly reposed in him. Such should rather have been the conduct of the Might Honourable Secretary, instead of violating the focus of the House, the secrecy imposed on him by the duties of his office, and the jtist and sound principles of the Constitution. _ . ..... The Hon. Member then moved the following Resolution : •" That it appears to this House, that the Secretary of Fo reign Affairs has read to this House.garbled extracts from the dispatches of a late liet'retary of Foreigu Affairs to foreign Courts, which dispatches were riot regularly before the Horse ; atal which, thoogli :tweed for by Members of this Hume, had been rfased, on the pica they could not be afforded to ttis House •: - .thout subverting the custdin of the House, the freedom of debate, oud the welfare of the uatiou." Mr. CANNING—.' On n 1130t10:1 so materially af fecting Tire as the present OW. I fool. it fieceisary to trespass on the !louse whirl few hivitelTeiolls• I did expect, from the deep aid acknowledged Parliamentary knowledge of the Hon. Gentleman, that something new would have fallen from him an the present object. I must confess my surprise and astonishment are very great. The confidence, however, with which he delivered his opinions, sill not, I am sure, without stronger reasons than he has displayed, mike them the more fully relied on. The llonotinible Cleutteman has argued consi derably at length on tire danger, es he terms it, of rustling rathict.. from letters without their• being officially before the House. 1 think these • fears will sot he. entertained by any but him sel£ flowerer great tire necessity, and however iniportaitt the service to be rendered to the cone. try, nothing in his mind could warrant this act. I assert it is what has been done by two of the greats est men that eirer ornamented this country. Mr. Pitt, during the late war, in a debate on overtures of peace made by France, quoted althipatch writ ten by him to our -Minister at Peteniburgli, in reply to an accusation of his not being • pacifically inclined. This was heard, cheerect„ and even received with approbution by his political opponents. I remember, that my Lord Ilowick, whilst in Administration, in an angry debate, quoted an extract from Lord Cathcart; and this is the very kversoti who has been Made the subject of such whining complaints. The Hat Gentleman, on t bite important question to the pensioning of a Judge, did read an eiartict of a letter from the Duke of Portland, for the pur pose of aft %jug a stain on that transaction, and be . now comm forward to signify his disapprolvationof such practices, and to amuse us with the danger likely to accrue from it. liideed, Sir, I . feur that the present Motion is brought forward with no other view titan to make one the subject of per sonal attack. if it could lie sheen that I have! (in the use mole of the extracts of lettersresAl by me) been doing that which had the tendency to subvert the principles of the Constitution, +Lnd de. strop the best interests of the country, there is no of indignity and obloquy to which 1 should out submit. I will, however, not take up the time of the House further, and feeling that the elation is of a crinauutory vulture, I Leg leave to withdraw." Mr. WIIITERLAD thought there might he cir euutstaimes ,in which a Melillo:1r of Parliament should withdraw, but he would ask, 'whether Los was one or that description ? The Sr& ii a thought the Motion a criaiinatory one, and therefore it wus competent to the lion. Secretary to withdraw. Mr. %it %OHO, argued warmly in favour of the Alotiok, and maintained, that if even the practice of rearing extract* Mini litters not officially before the House was mode out, it would not invalidate the doctrine laid down by his lion. Friend. • The CHANCELLOR of the EICHROVEIe opposed the motion., as the most strange and 11111WCieleary thateser was submitted to the consideration of Parliament. Its adoptiob by tbe House would to tally exclude that extent of information which was essential to parliamentary discussion. elle there fore moved the order of the day. Mr. 11 .11TMIXAD contended with great ability that sandier the defeuce of the Right Honoura b le Secretary, or of his colleagues, was satisfuctory or couslusive. Their only system was to recriminate on their opponents, but it happened here that the charges bandied back did not apply. There was neither similitude or the remotest analogy in the precedents to which they bad alluded. There was nothiug lier.tofore to justify the impropriety, lie would say, indecency of the Right Hon. Sec. its reading garbled extracts of those pipers which, on the ground of public safety, he had previously re fused to lay before the /Lame of Commons. it was true that, on a former occasion, Lord Melville read extracts of dispatches not before the House, but he falsified the conclusion that he then drew, by snak ing, nest morning, at the request of Mr. Pitt, an apology to the persons who felt themselves ag grieved. This practice had been reprobated by peens of all parties, and almost at all times, in Use history of Parliament ; by Lord Lechniere, Mr. Pitt, and Mr. Fos. It was left for Secretary Can ' sing, not only to record his practice of it, hut also to attempt his justification, and this, too, after vio lating the feelings of two most respectable (sharer tern, and alter he bad - expressly declared to the [loose, that the production of this document a ould prove iniutious to the national safety. Lord 'ASTLEItEReII made some brief remarks on the observations of Mr. Vl'hirtvread, and es pressed his hostility to the resolutions of the Learned Mover (Mr. Ad am.) . Mr. ADA 34 made a gusset animated reply, to which, from the pre.eure of Geiser smatter, we re gret our ineonspetessee to do jetetire. Pe de clared his reset in timbale the Right llnnournble Gentlemen lisal left the House before he begird from him (Mr. Adam) a direct refutatio n of ti. charge which he had Jo unfairly mode *gala s *, That Right Honourable.-Gentleman had ag ,„';', ponied his allusion with a pert witticism, hut i t despised the tnottve of tb attack, as lie d e t eN the imputation of a love Of profit which had t vcritawassantably applied to tough from tie Assi„ teriaj beach/. He assured the Geutlemea op site . 04 be ors pot to be diverted from the t r . of his alljiratents, by a senseless yell. whi c h , ever k• maifkftesiplify the folly of those -oh s indecorously conducted themselves. could tie i tt ofiltet or distract him. He next vitichort himself from the charge which Mr. Se crt . 'Canning had made, and pr ove d most aatisf* torily t b,t there was not •oulyno atialup l y ease, bat thut he was faircied, in self &team, h reed a prieate document, in order to meet a sista meat that was made of a nature unpleasant% hs feelings. He must say, that jorecedent. as attempt, ed to be made, was false in fact, and that th e House would, from such a specimen, more cats tiously 'appreciate the validity of the ststew elo y proteeding from that quarter. He then proore,:i to argue forcibly on the general merits of the e t,. jectious taken to his resolution. The question atm then put on the motion for th e order of the day, whet, a division took pla ce , a. „,1 the 11 UM here tv ere Asn rags Nees majo►ky. The report of the Orders of Council was, se understood, postponed nutil Monday, to which thy the House, at Two O'CLocE. arljoumeJ. List of the Milionty the Liverpool Petition Abertromby, Hun.. J. Adam, W. Asistruther, Rt. Hun Sir J. Auhrry, SirJ. Baring, A Thur. eraard, S. Blacklyurne, Juba Blackbarne, ;oho J. lioevrrie, Hun. tAw. Andmema. Hoe. A. C. - 1140 War ). Aatbowy ar , g, tar•mige Cateraft, J. Callan*, Sir G. • . Canusualisii, Lwrd G. Cuillawne, • How. C. L. • . ton Hotta. , Viscount Ham. W.. E. E. , sUiitt, Right Hun. W. 4 , 'wigwam, S.C. Fitspydrick, Rt. U0v.1114. Grefahal, it. Grießniwaff, -•••-• Hcrbert. H. A. i Hilsbcrt, G. Homer, Francis • Howard, Hou,W. Hume, W. H. k; Jekyllii.Josepit Knoz.altdo Tholistala Lamb, Hun. Latuwebe .• &Priem* F. o,•,Leask a,daa met w Lennon, Cho,. IlAtryd, 3. who voted for receiviN I.itob in%t on, S. Thiedu.s lames M'Avmrir, t4rseral Ilatiducks, W. A. Motion, Vilicogist Martin, H. Millar, Si T. Mosley, So. 0. Neopurt, Ht. Hon. Sir J. North, Lhatilry OrJ, W: Oimakituto, Lard Porsell, H. PrOisso, Hos. C. A. PIM", Lord H. Pi , mmtt, Sir A. PoWilby, 11141(114 Woo. G. "-Pureirotor, lard Prittio, How. F. . °mho, Hos, W. H. Rowel, Lord W. R. eistc:, 1.41111 e VIE EARL DRESS; DIE torts 3Y UAttTit, Ido9. The Order of tlbe I)uy being read fur the Lordo to he stitnnimied ; • • • • It was moved, Tim an humble Address be presenter to Ilia ,Haasty, submitting— That alter lucratively easwidering all the Wilt: dors mettle lwfitre u. , I.IEI .11-111 C the late attack on Copenleere, and the war island* it Sins produced, a • have found thr fonetation a - h,rd, they iitiorti extratuel) impearset and 161t1i.a.. That to a mattes is whit h both the honour sad the int-r -ests of our county are so deeply concerned, we had Lora for the fullest explanations. 'I he principles of saw Cue , ti. tittion, and the uniform practice of His 3lajesty, and the SOITIVIVIS of His illustrious Forme, require that Parliament should be distinctly apprized of the true giutmile ut enteriat into new wars, especially in a situation of our reentry Wholly unprecedented. Had Denmark been a party to any hostile ronfedersci against the rights or interests of the British Empire, ow renitence would have heat 141.4 ewotry and our warfare kip. innate. Under such eireuwastances, we should only have had to regret, that the porta and swords of that country should so lightly have hem abandoned, alien advantages so very inconsiderable had been derived hoot their temporary ocsupettuu, and when by unr continuing to hold them Jar , log tie war, all real danger from that quarter might have been effectually averted. . . Hut se alumni doubt, that Demaark,imitend of ropes( iu hostile leagues, Led resolved still to mait.taiii her neu trality. This fart is preyed eves by the imperfect dm, agent* which have been laid before ns,•aud is confirmed Ay th► Prorlassiatias Maned by His Majesty's Cumumadais ini ssediatelyheismi Hoe att.ick. . _ _ Certain> , lhouwark wee no party, sor does ft appear dot she was privy, to any oendiederacy hostile to this ruttittr we are nut teen satisfied that such a league did mall> a %tit. The conclusion of any secret Area,* at Tilsit, alitctiag the rights or interests of the British empire, appear. 1/ have been naikenaly denied both by Russia and France. The comespoodenee of lips Majesty , ' Secretary of Slat , . and the dates of die traanactions tiseasseines, prove that Its Majesty's Ministers could not be in pomeasitet tar any "och Articks when the attack was ordered against Copeabagew sad it bee hero distinctly admitted in this House, that they have nut yet obtained a copy of them. The Kinc's Anibasaadm at Pctetsborgh, in an out. pal mote, rested the defence of the WPM , not nu au) , bottle purposes tither of Denmark or /NACU, but .utely on the designs which it was said the Preach Gurerans..sit had luag miser bees known to eat His MaJettly's Minisiets not only tortoise .to advise each ineasans ea would hove been Leerroary to ant real 'motility of Route. hut they u..timhy solicit*: the inediatiuti of that Power, to extinguish * a u, and her guarantyr to de fret Proiectsi it' which it ts 11111 s pertetided they Luew her to have been a priticiisal sad C , 8111 . 3t tin party. Alkgetious thus iuruiluistent with each other, and CO I7 ton) to admitted feet., trinket', out. ad of bupportiolf, the cease to shish they ore applied. %kith respect to the alleged arceasity of the cease, • r have to assure His Majesty, that se eautiut thuak so inesoli of Ilse power and scsoureem of Ists miner, of Ow sprit cf lii pew*, or 4 the valour and . his fleets and 3 . sans, as to admit that such an act could have bseis regime.' fur any purpose of self. pram rvatioa. Any tinwares) advantagts which the possession of 50 . % ships act stuns as were taken at l'opeuli maim east aunt, J. , mush more tlisn coutdeilisianced by the cis me grim is Oft Itt• amare whirb appromt, iqo objettious* in policy than in principle That m,issore has ti,pwatte I the misnber of our . oroo:. ”,,..•:tetuumbed tke iii ju t uta 'woo cir.ututrd ir"1111w. " V. • s S i b i:r7dan .ll , Rt. Rm. R. I 44ipley; Bd. SelitlyW. • F42•k7, igrd wilussam , • Tarittems_ll. • 1 V 4 a4 .1 1:* „ • Riot lien. • /km. g. • Hos J 4 . the Ari, G,. , Werrefider, :Sit. '4lWeiagion, e - .r 4 A. I. not tee. W. Winne, $ Crean, lire= • gpectlsg oar principles and designs spire us the wannest porous of iv. outions. Bat it has, above aft, ,hakes • oar justice of oar cause. A stsitirnerit wi ported as through all our dillkolties, meet of other punitive, and encouragiii, o sAdrat reliance on the ultimate re of Presictence. Unr deioG as we are, emu yet. to pre stibrrt, the full knowledge of ultell tamely withheld from on, and relacto admit emsrlosians sofavouralne to Cimacils by which 114 Majesty's omit We VC yet eJtupettc.l, or such a 2 ore: jesjeidy the language of Math. An, grid all humility, sad w.th the moss lilt sorrow, rerreacid, that in a case, seneited the ekanut proof, every pees mid that us, particle of evidence` it di s "Mitt oar notional diameter IN guilt of 41/ unprovoked and preined;l good faith, justice, ur.d humanity, wh at awe the giury sod safeguard cif which tieing .objected to, after a low was put tbereupou. It was revolved PR `YT. AGAINST Tar RTJECTIOr or TI JIIAJI6TV, POOrOIIiD iv ••• • Diarenrirato—for the mamma wt. popomul Vdress to His Mjesty, tn cni of recording as a ntrtsurriol of measure trittch bus, We fear, fixed an inmour our cumitry. it', a. fret (1). of Gloat ester) Vaasa', Rutland Dairy spoon* Pouliot*, Punks (Moira) Emit cleat (Dente)) 'taffeta Zreu vine Albemarle Earproct Itsulalee appro►:lg of the c the attack uo Coprnhacvn, on reirrtionyfthe E.,rl an A4dreas to His Majers: : " That tbii }lowa, conaoir.l:4 tl Ihre ties be iiia eitrjrati's eunrua Coniittant nes ri dived, in coos bus sod brace of Irs.t—tlie as, French Government to exclude the port of Europe, and to coat:doe ail Uncut in a patrol confederacy ar and plaint rainbows sof Great 1 yore the prompt sad etzianas mea be Hip Majesty's afinisters, fur I sat of the melt of His Miewsty' fsgst resource. of Densocrit." th:s &rotation the f tered aid signal by the sa, the Protest on the rtjectiii TO atlcre . 1 . Din.tiTtsewt..... --. Remise we bold it ate ibis Howe to par a Tut:. a • IritikoSt SST Fut' , of the alkgstiu Ilistars is diets OW& CROSC spun su GOTTis".VBEIRG: SWEDISH PA GOT ri I rlibleeounta from Stnekli wellies% ►tating, that Rai, against Sweden, appear to for though that *vent is to h yet taken place; neither h Danish Ministers left Stork) Minister St. Petersburg+. Every preparation is maki to oppose any attempt that it. On this side, the greate The Swedish fleet in Ca 12 iatil of thettine, are marl lutetlig,enee has just arriv the member of 40,000 mci shvisioas for Zealand ; the leave Lubeck on the 12th dotte was at Copenhagen arranvements. ra Letters front tielsiaburg that the object of the abov Zealand, but to march thn thence to embark for Nni enter Sweden. We are mor the arrival of an Englisl► tions. All accounts see, being on their march throe strange report to-day, that is bound hither to co-open Orders have been sent h to the Russian and Prue hagen, to make the droop the proceedings of the I] against the jnrisdiction Russian and Prnssian shit The misery that exias i beggars description, parti, the exactions of the Frent of the necessarieS of lift and a total want of salt is The prior Prussians have of prohibiting the import. but in Rtrria it it :.till from thence. ALTONA It is said that the Ru rived here will sail iirune purpose of wintering an A repast is io circnlati Congtentene is expecte( syladroo has appeared Grr, Pau". St..l. Hut• King Brun. iVeni Lund Atlsa Ersk Suff. Bud