The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-02-28 00:00:00

- v7l! - 71.7"7 • ----.-- . ----- . Wiry ties itlespetwied thee? That Sespensioo.es pined is 1795, ',benzin indemoity took piece; end s possibly, it Noble Lords wished to know any thing seem foisting to the *mots of them times, the. L eape d Lord, who took so conspicuous a share in in Bien, !maid illesteste them more fully. Arsether Aet of Seopeweboit wet found neceseery . le the year 1797, end in the year 1801 a •Bili of Indemnity followed it. At all these periods- no persoo thought of commencing a snit at law, till, in 1801, some inertviduals beget to complain, when Parlia ment indemnified the Ministers of that day. The principles their Lordships were called to act upon, had hew atkesswiedgedever since the Reealotiost..... They were required to sanction the Bill by every principle of law, not upon the recommendation of their Secret Committee, but upon its Report ; and the same reasoning that was opposed to the measure now, might be urged with just as mach plausibility a fortnight hence. That Committee bad been compos ed in the established way, of. Noble Look on either side; and, unless they were really such rogues sod vagabonds as as not to be .Me to trust one another, the Secret Committee did tint deserve the language whirls was applied to it. But there were differences of opinion as to the necessity that had toasted for suspending the Habeas Corpus Act. Nothing had taken place- but to little rioting at Spa-fields, a tittle i robbing in the City, end a little treason at Derby.--I (Neer', hear!)—ft wienied the fashion to forget all that ha d been prevented, end make little of what had been done. He would tell his Learned and Noble Friend, however, that if mute designs had not been frustrated by the late Suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act, the Noble Lords might not have been there debating as to the propriety of indemni fying those who acted for the preservutimr of the Country by virtue of that Suspension Act. He be lieved that the Learned Lord and his party nsight have suffered more than even the Ministers of the Crown, in proportion as sew pretended friends were worsethen open enemies. —(Hear!)—That man must possess a very stout heart indeed, who, residing then itr the metropolis, had entertained no apprehensions from the Meetings of Spa-fields. He would not esectly say that those Meetings were guilty of treason; but be would maintain, that Ministers would have been guilty of a groins dereliction of duty if they bad omit ted to submit the parties tea trial. Scenes of a sitni- 1 ler kind would hue been acted in Derbyshire, and other parts, if the conspirators had been suffered to . prosecute their plans. Reform was not wanted by sects men, but the destruction of the Constitution.— Let their Lordships look at the state of the country , now, whose tranquillity was more owing to the Us pension of the Habeas Corpus Act—mild, merciful, preventive of misAief, instead of occasioning it..— , But it was enough that the practice of Parliament said it was reasonable that an Act of Indemnity I should pass, as otherwise there remained no means whereby to prevent fresh commotion. in the State.— The question was, whether What was done had not been done for the public good ? The Learned Lord , (Erskine) on a former night said, he expected tol beer doubts suggested en the Bill; hut in this he would be disappoitited, as he entertained no doubt upon it. The country was called, by Learned and Noble Lords, great and free; and it was justly called tor.' Butit would be neither great nor free,, if its inhabitants hail not the good sense and patriotism to agree to a temporary suspension of their liberties, in entre to preset,. them in perpetuity. Lord HOLLAND said, the Learned Lord had contrived to entangle and puzzle the subject, rather than to elucidate it. If what was said to justify the present measure was true; if Ministers had only done their duty under the Suspension Act, from the consequences of the execution of the - power granted by which this Bill protected therm; if they had ar rested no person but upon oath; if they had met sured out against their victims a greater measure of severity than circumstances warranted; if, in short, they had not 'needed their powers, and committed injustice ander pretence of preserving the Laws and Constitution of the country, with the care of which they were intrusted, then they bad no need of in demnity. Indemnity was only necessary in cases where law wield yield no protection; but where there had been no oppression, there was nc breach of law, and, consequently, no use in the precerit measure. If in Indemnity Bill, as bad been men. tioned by the Noble Duke who introduced this mea sure, wee always to be a corollary, es he called it, to a Suspension Act, then it would Lebow, that any jest exercise of :he powers conferred by Ake letter must necemarily been eacess ; or, in other words, that rip Act of Parliament could not be executed without be ing abased.-( [lcor !)—This argument of the Noble Duke appeared to him to cut doable, and therefore was as dangerous in his hands as against him. But other Noble Lords opposite had defended the Bill before the Hosea on different grounds. They said it tits necessary to protect this Gournmentegainst suite or actions instituted to remover damages by. those whom they bed oppressively ermined sud detained.; &mese, in allowing legal proceedings to go on against them, it would be necessary for their own jestifies tion to disclose the information on which they acted. What was this {rut stating in other words, that the Noble Secretory of State for the Home Department, who, in his zeal for the protection of theiCoossito. . ties, or in his alarm for the public safety, might have bees led to commit acts of• individeal heedelses, which his opinion of theezirney might too cuter) extent !Scams if tat justify, stood is so modest in demnity ; bet that hie informers most be protected against the cmseqweirces of their falsehoods, their calumnies, and their delinquencies ?;--(fleer !]--- What was it bet sayirre, that this horrible miscreant (Oliver) most net suffer the reward of his crimes ; , that the shield of power must be held before this tile wretch ; that in elevating this shield for bus protec- the victims of his atrocious arts and - raglan' iniquities were to be left without redress, to pine tinder the effects pf his machinations; and • that ill law and justice were to be trampled under foot, lest their retriblitive force sboold eaten(' to him cendien punishment, or expose him to merited in . lams l— [Loud crier of Ilermiteer!]— Out the Noble std Learned Lord (Chancellor) had said, that he-bad toted for the Suipension Act in 1795, which was repealed in 1797 ; and. that, though the liberty of England was thus destroyed for two years, and the iihject was left at the mercy of the Executive, no attune was instituted for any abuse of poster exec- •r _ ciseil under the Act. , k r ia; 6 4lohlreaud Learned Lord . bed then detailed ode; precedents to justify the late Suspension and the present Indemnity Bill; but in his (Lord lielleed's) *pinion they did net apply. He bad alluded to the pretedeet ie Kiug time, and hod mentioned that that eras a period when the Government could not be scented of wishing to exercise power at the espence_ of justice, and yet , that a Bill of Indemnity bad they passed. But it ought not to be forgotten, that though the Govern.. rent of that Prince was in general wise and just, be, was sarroanded by a party who, in their teal for the °ratty interest, bad saceeded their powers. The periods of 1715 and 1745 were equally dissimilar to the present, and the precedents taken from them equally inapplicable. At both theae times there was a civil war in the country. The Noble end Learned Lord, in recurrioj to the eneetmeut of the Habeas Corpus in the time of Charles H.. had not treated that great bulwark of our liberties with sufficient reverence, es stated with sudicieot force the importance and necessity of the circum. stances which would justify its suspension. He had praised this law itself ; bet be seemed, from his language,. to think that " it lass more honoured in the breach than the observance." At the period of 1800, he remeashored the Noble and Learned Lord had supported the Bill of Indemnity, on the grsiund that the person who bail given information might be in the power of the enemy, and therefore that their names aught not to be disclesed. No pre tence of this kind could he now advanced. The in. formers under the late Seepeatiosi Act were in no danger.frons au enemy ; they would only be left as they ought, by a disclosure of their name: andlesti. teeny, to the execrations of their country, and the burden of their own infamy. In ci!ing precedents in their favour, oue of the Noble Lords opposite had el. luded•to the Bill of Indemnity that passed the Irish Parliament, and had said that posterity would judge of its necessity and junco. 'fits judgment of every impartial man who was /legislated with the cheeses stances had already decided against that iniquitoui Act. One of the greatest lawyers end ablest pond. daos which Ireland bad produced had loudly de. dared against it. The late Lord Avonmore had said from the Bench, that thikoppressions suffered under the Suspension Act ought to have been redressed.— After having mangled the limbsof a roan without trial, and without proof of guilt, it w 4 a horrible crime to deny him redress by passing en Act to protect his persecutor. Lord Avonmore regretted, when the action was brought before him, that the Indemnity Act stood in the say of the redress which his 'offerings demanded. The 'Noble Lord here reed a part of the charge which. Lord Avonmore de livered to the Jury in a suit brought against Colonel. Fitzgerald, to recover compensation in damage, for torture alleged to be exercised by him during the Irish rebellion. 44 This," said his Lord ship, " was an action brought by the Plaintiff to re cover damages from Colonel Fitzgerald, for acts of cruelty and oppression committed against law." Much had been said by certain persons about loyalty ; but he,did not understand the meaning of the word when brought as an apology for oppression. Loyalty, pro• perly uuderatood, was another term for, legality, and he who acted legally acted loyally. The Learn. edJadge thou irking up the Act of Irsderunity, said, that. to have damages the Plaintiff must not only &bow that the law has been violated. but that it has been violated in a way for which this Act did not grant indemnity. Had this Act not stood in the way, no damages could harebeen excessive for such atroei. ties as those imputed to the Defendant; but the Act interposed ea insurmountable barrier between injury and redress, and set all justice still equity at defiance. Bills of the kind now before the House, if passed to bar the oppressed: from redress, would do more to promote the cause of Reform than all the Petitions about Anneal Parliaments. He did not wish to go through all the Reports of all the Secret Committees ; but becouW not help saying, let any one reed the two first, and then consider the state of the country as represented in the last, and lay his hand upon his his heart, and declare whether she denzers were greatly eziggerated.—Pfenr, hear!'—Witen it was icons is that the Noble Secretary of State employed such a character as Oliver; wt..° it was known that he spoke of him wittrrespect, their Lordships ought to look to the effect that such conduct would have on the Magistrates. Some country Magistrate, the little tyrant of hh owls &main might wish to irni. tete the example of the Noble Secretary. He would say, " I shall halo my Oliver end Castles; I shell likewise have any correspondent as well as the Secre tary of Skate; I shall employ Spies to enable some neighbouring Nobleman, with whom I wish to higratiate myself by my zeal and my sub.l tereierscy, to detect the peachevs on his estate."-" It would be superfluous to point out all the rectifier-1 tions throvgb which the poison of soots an example, might 'spread, destroying prisatecoefideace, correpts mug the honest feelings of the People, and setting chess of men, or oae peat of the population of the country, against another. If a proper opportunity were offered, be would pledge himself to prose,. , that so (tieback as-1812e similar systentof espionage and disseosion • had cernnseneed in thii country. He., alluded to thedistrictseboot Bolton and Manchester, where Orange Clubs were established, where spies bad been for some years employed, and from whence mesh of the iefoeme tiers .oar wtlieb she Government bad lately proceeded bad comer Oa the bread patocipie of.justior mil right he called apse the• ligeststa throw oet4be peewee Bill. sod allow the injured Instate-seek their redress. He" woeid most decidedly give bin eoteagainst it. The -Bees* should , do south*. for character. He wee against the , measure. altogether, bet would vete for the amities lof his Noble Friend. Lord SiDMOUTH beg*, by • obseetriag, that be was not is person who could properly enter span a discussion, the object of which was to indemnify him for the way its which be-bed performed AM* falic...l thins cotateitted heeler; bet' be•beel a motive for rising, voile distinct from any personal considers. Liens. He mast, in the first place, say, that than who conceived that he asked isw this Bill. ire order to preclude himself from the necessity of digclosing the infertestiee *Nell hail come before him, come pletely mistook Isis purpose and his character. The individesis who had fruited their Dames to his cost fidence might have felt perfectly snare, even if this were not paced; fur uo consequence which might _ .~•_- _~~~.. l _t ' . lwootai his own liberty, Roper% would ever have induced him to Vitae !]—(;et then, the Noble spoken lest, bad asserted that tended as ea indemoity for the , hot for an individual upon 'bons had. in a very few words, beeped more abase than he (Laid .idmootb) bad evert littered against any , but man. Rat he would tell that garble fined that be was mistaken in his °Onions respecting that indi. tithed ; the Bill did not concern him in any manner whatever • he had done nothing thick could possibly makes/14 opal necessary for his eeewrii . y; nu pin tail had been 'apprehended Ur consequence of informa tion from that quarter, nor had an) steps been taken at his suggestion, or arising out of his disclosures. The Noble Lord, not content. with 'entitle, his in dignation against an informer, bad gene further, sod tented it en a body which had hitherto been intim. peached —(No, no! front Lord Holiaiid.)—of that useful body of men who were the main pillages( she intense! strength of the country, and without whom co-operation the patine, tranquillity could not be pre. nerved.--(Hear. hear! )—These men did not deserve to be treated with that levity which the Noble Lord employed against them. As to the system of espionage, Le disdained it as much as any man; he abhorred with all his heart whateeer tended to shaker, . the confidante of the private dwelling, et weaken the bonds of social intercourse between man and mau but when he was pieced in that.situation that aw opportunity of wing his country front inturredio* was presented to him by means of an informer, could, be as am upright Minister, could be as an honest man, reject such informationi lie only wished, that he could consistently with his dirty disclose what had been communicated to him : above au., he wished be could disclose what had pissed be tweets him and Oliver. He had, indeed, made. a fell disclosure to the Secret Committees of both Houses of Parliament ; so fell that he was not swat, of a particle that was not in their possession : wished that it were consistent with propriety to make an equal disclosure to the country generally, that he might state is hat related to Oliver, and show how much the Public were mistaken in that man's motives and conduct. He would broadly say, there was not a single case of imprisonment, which, its his own mind, or in the minds of any of those who hid M 1..; cially advised it, produced the slightest feeling of self. reproach: There was not one individual apprehend ed against whom he would not proceed in a similar manner, under similar circumstance.—a(itear. hear!) —The accounts of their treatment, as furnished by the prisoners themseleer, were full of the grossest misrepresentations and falsehoods, and he could enter into particulars which would convince the House, except that they did not concern the present discus sion He would not therefore touch upon them ; indeed, his chief object in rising had been to sloe. thiii ! OliSter could not come within the scope of the prevent Bill; for he had done nothing that required *forgiveness or indemnity ; end he defied any Noble Lord to say that he had made use of Oliver in any way repugnant to strict honour, or strict law, or that he had exercised any of his official functions in ally way injurious to the Constitution.—[Hear !] Rart GROSVENOR said, that nothing had oc curred which could justify the Finspeosion of the Ha. bees Corpus Act. Noble Viscount bad defend. ed Oliver, and not without cause; for, if Oliver should tern out to have been guilty of the acts be littled to him, then the Noble Lord himself would be answerable for the conduct of his scent, on the common principle of Qui ,farit per aliuns, faell per ow , The Earl of CAIINAR VON mid, the Noble. Viscount (Sidmoutb) had commenced his speech by disquslifying himself from taking any part in the pre. sent discussion, and had fairly avowed what was lb& fact, that he could not with propriety advocate measure which was so personal to himself ; he trusted that the Noble Viscount would carry it a step further, and would give no vote on a matter so extremely per sonal.—[A laugh, and Ilear !]—Bat he should like to know when and how the Noble Viscount had afilned et this jest opinion ; for he (Lord Carnarson) could not bat recollect that a few days ago that Noble Lord had appointed himself to sit as Judge row his own conduct, in conjunction with certain other Judges all chosen from a list furnished by himself. —[Heor, hear, hear!]—Since the appointment or that Committee, several Petitions had been laid by him (Lord Carnsrvon) upon their Lordships' table, and be could not but think it a peculiarly hard case, that these Petitioners could procure no hearing be. fore the House, and that now they were also to he shat out from all redress before the ordinary tribe. nals of their country ; but what was scarcely less .herd was, that the Noble Viscount should, in the very face of these facts, get ep and declare to the astonished ears of their Lordships, that he had laid before the Secret Committee all the evidence that could beprocered; all the circumstances of every case. The Noble Viscount bad forgot, bat a °old the House forget, that he had a very few slays ago refused to lay them. Petitions before tbat Commit tee? When he first laid the Petitions es their Lord ships' table, with a &sife to make a motion on the 'abject, he was told that such a proceeding was pre mature, and delay was required. Well, after the in terval which had been begged of him, he briniest for ward his motion, but was then told that the Commit tee were about to make their Report, and that such additional information would only puzzle and dis:. tract them. And now that a Report was made, and a Bill of Indemnity, its visual consequence, was brought in, it was said the subject of the Petitions should not be alluded to—it was quite irrelevant—it mai too late.—(Haar, hear ! and a laaga.)—lle wield conclude by impressing on their Lordships, that on their conduct in this !nosiness- depeaded the character of their Lordships,- the character of the Ministers nay, the character of the injured Oliver himself—(A laugh, and loud cries of hear, hear 1) — far against him as well as ago/test the unfortunate complaints's, whose petitions lay scorned and un heeded upon their table, would this Bill of lotlem•. idly block up all the avenues of legal redress. — (Neer !)--.lle shouta opposes he Bill in every stage. The question was :then loudly called for, and the. Hoots divided fur the Hilt being read a wiped times- Comeau SG Non Comeau 15 Proxies 44 Proxies 1110 3i—majority 67. Alooraed at Half-past Ten. - - - ' dYy ointmell es Mr. ,4F.14.., A. 4..„, ...order ed to he jaid before 'lie Hesse aT&cioutrun of Copper *lib Melt Midi*: the telilrdr 411fddflkik kturtaty,' .1118, 'Alm de Amami of the tpleatrl k eerrifrogled• into Great ale , for the year eudinit d o t? 241 . 40 slmliar Niffelli said also 61401410 be enrababillbe bad herward had ilMedd, • [1.1... 1 0 „ 4N UFA KITE Mr Aldiestati w 000 ewttited the Pekitini lie Mayne. AlleAseor led • • 4 he city of Maori, Atilitib sue Bill demo twight be introduced Ws that Mouse foe Wear allying Al Misters from the comequelen 4 the de its obit* they had enforced rile Act of 164 tleiloo, sr ne the lariwa , °writs. The nn.e.raMe Illdetßaaiaw btNiesyt teal thf raver its the Petition. said he would sot sake op the time 4 the fliaseat that mometo with ;ay remarks oa the übject, bat Would ie • serve him,elf for the mterfritt *lwo sued a Bill attelst Mier been imeedieed. He would merely say. that the Hell ta which the Peonage ems agreed to wilt one of the mat mummies be hod ewer withesied, nod dial only four hands bad bees held up agtfiew the Pethitid. Oa else ameoicto the! the Petition shield hem the table. Sir W. CURTIs observed. that all be bad loony was, that ion Jtild atteodett the H4ll ib question, and trait he emPproved of !Veil/ Void 4 the Petition. 'lite Pvtitioat was then ordered to be rioter). Mr. P. MOORE presen.ed Petitiosi from the Ribisand %beater, of ii*ottrirt, end the allt. Whifteii of M:lrctecho i;` tirebte Wee W sea Select ide midetwood thank the gilitegolitioi of. Wage. • warAljettota. Mr. Sherif Deithges relented a Petition free Ow LOC Pistil... A klerowo, did Caatoorts of the City of Loadoo, Cl hewn Coutscil assemblest,agattet Meet Aectioos. Mr. Alderman ATKINS, le uterhe dim it should lie oit the tat.le. represented to the Heme the frauds Met were committed. in tbedb Asglowl. Afters very careful isorestigmitso if the et di attendant on these Meek Aue ions. be tins enabled uatequiro. rely to deckle. Oat so measure mild be mare generally soda Miaow by othiehthey Amid be suppres,ed. Mr. LOW I bliToN intscuated his acquiescence io the opiniod tithe worthy Aide osita. The Petilloa times thee ordered to he printed. .Me, HAIN NOTON pretested a Tetanus' from the Attornieo of Leicestel, praying lbw unqualified prowls might nut beat. lowed to Shot Canveyilmeets.-Ordered to lie eo the table. UAW.: LAWS. Mr. G. BANK ES brought in a BM for the more erected% prevent ion of offences eottnettel with the onion fat de,truct ion of Gator —Read's( hew time, cod ordered to be read usecood time ea Friday, the halt of April. and. to he orient!. LEATHER TAX. Mr. T.VOINITIVIN anted that there h r hid before that House an He( omit of the intamml assome el the Ha t IPS OM lamthee is Great Kritaiii, for the her years reef:ling the adoitimial tags mid in Arcoent showing the annual amount of (how dui ies sioee the:AC(4o.l tai, distinguisbiag le both sections the amount be etch year. The Accounts were then ordered to be laid.b,fore the House. as w ere (on the flit er•tido of Lord ALT II Oil P) i aeco.ln Lte with map* t totherPrewhhekti. Mr. LUSHINGION brought up the Report 01 the Officre Indemnity Bill, which 14 al. agreed to, and the Bill was (littered, to be read t tutud time on Monday. 4.• ed A. 11 A MIL fON ore-enled a Petition from the Bar= gere3 of the Rtnel Bergh of N'sgtowo, cuintilaiustie of abincs, in the Lleetion of the Mac Write) 4 that Borough, and prify tog for redrest.- - Ordered to be printed. CLERK itt* PARLIAMENT. Sir M. %V. RIDLEY r4se to ask, Whether or sal' it was the inter!tion of the lion. Gentlemen oppoiliUlt thenaseives to more a new Writ for Southampton ? Mr. S. BOUI4YE replica, that the fart was, that, tie present Member for that Botottali had neither' been sworn in to the °like of Cleuk of Pat liament,: our had he appointed a Depoty. Mr. BitOUGHAM said, the question was, bad he. accepted the odice? Mr. S. BOURNE said, that unquestionably he was entitled to it by reversion. Still, however, Ito! maintained that his lion. Frietidi. seat was sot vas cited, mail he had actually taken posseeeion of tbs• office, witch be hod not yet-doe.: Wwis reader the motion for a new Writ, his Lien. Yrlead bad no wish uu the subject. I Sir M. W. RIDLEY observed, that being loserieifr in the patent as entitled to the tesersion of the office, the Roo. Gentleman came into pommies of it is. reediately on the death of the holder; so that a new Writ ought to have beee moved for within a short period of that event. lie should now, therefore,. move the Order of tine Day for:naming the arljoarnesk debate on the motion for the Speaker to eases his warrant to the Clerk of the Crown, to make oat at 1101. Writ for the election of a Burgess to serve in the present Parliament, for the Towa and Coen/ of the Town of Southampton, is the room of G. H. Rose, Esq. who, since Ilia election, haJ accepted tbe office of Clerk of Parliament. The debate was accordingly resnned, and on the motion of Sir M.W. RIDLEY the nest Writ was or+ dered. REPORT or THE SECRET COMMITTEE. Mr. BA ill llitiT appeared at the here, and brought up the Report of the Secret Coweitittee. ft was rue pidly read by the Clerk, and slated In substance' die follows : " The Committee to whom were referred the pee iters in a sealed hag. presented to the figure of Com. mons by Lord Viscount Castlereagh, by command of his Royal nightie., the Priers! 11 , g•tto, In oeler that they might examile into the newer of them, and Report as they should see cause, 'Tafe i n p urima , m t of their ins' ruct; ons, entered into the investigation of those papers, and have agreed to the folloeitig Report : " The first object of the Committee in the exami nation of the papers submitted to them, leis been to , erns a justestintate of what has been the ititernal state Id the coons?'" Juin) the period when the Secondlteport • of the Secret Covenittee of last Session was present id to the House. 66 It 'appears that an insurrection broke net on. ithe 9th of June last, on she bort!ers of Yorkshire. and Derbyshire, shortly before the Second Report' of the Committee of last Session *so laid before the I House; but that the arrest of some of the principal leaders deranged the designs of the dieaa , cted, that' various obstacles delayed the execution of a sit:mita., neous Alen of iota, k on No: l ghem, which they bad; projected, and firefly, that they wee wholly dia. persed by a military force assembles! fur that purpose. " The suppression of this insurrection which bad . evidently a resolution for its object, the apt:ellen• . ,!sell of most of the rimy persons engaged in it, the trials which took place in the Courts of Law of solve . fur flies Treason, and the salutery detection of otbers ender thg Act of last Sento*, to empower his- Majesty to secure sod detain inch - persons as hie Majesty should suspect were cut ',AN; against his person and Government, frustrated the violist de signs of the turbulent in those districts.' JI3eI the spirit of disafrectien was not entirely. eselngßisbed, and further proceedings were found to be tteceseary. 46 In the course of the succeeding month, bids of• FdicAlsent for High Treason were found by the Grains'(`! tiny, at the Anises at Derby, agsfust 46 of the persocieherged with having teen cog lei in the . insurrection.' fu the month of October, before a lefty, or imputation, Ortwral §jorest é ined Pethiei from tatter at in: L aUSE OF COMMONS. " obis Lord who had ada bpiisiiati alf . esaipiaintag at' the dioreitei. sunder whit* ' lalerod 64 4etMe rdier * the B il l was not in. Petn , tram th- r poration of Toilets' is Dahlia, AA he gni eta lit of state. • riled the" Tat.-0 insolititraiiereitektrall the Leal Moto that NOble Lord tht the taiiilaspal. ?fr. GitIiNF.E.P., A 4 :04;1t Wag "lief' ;, I r~ I • -1 ..firrlng. 4-4, —";- ' • -14.7"--.1,..-77- '—, >. --"; AP' ar-9r79,.7 _ _ -- • . . - • ~.oz" -..."-4,-.. .4' cw-j4L. _,, • • r 4 _ _ '{