The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-04-07 00:00:00

[GTO, _ ."'~► THE STATESMAN igto IN" nisit,thet) (ember for Sandwich. He might ask I Member if Ima-ilimkeeee the riper* , There were Sin &ties "filch he would .1* hated lb hod krereased riacreased emus the tau bad beee.jespeeed. . before the tat, those defies would be 52,0001. and is five years after, 181.0001. iguana) of the. tax coeld net be priper. the pockets of the Peeples sum of' it into those of the tanners ; for no 'imagine that umber tax weold sot be im. its: room. The line of argument that had (*,sued was somewhat remarkable. First, the Revenue had been examined; that would the'' Reveries was improved then the bad' been adduced; • - ergemeet . l them also failed, for-tbey le had le. . the Noble Lord batiarmed that OK itutaished in _amber last yees.by,2l.-.-!. , Wes in a state of advancement, by the fact that the quantity of the increased. • The Noble' . Lord might as. a prim( of: its advancement, the tan.yard of Angus. Brewell tied Co. show how the tag opersted Qn principal course of teas years, their trade bad and in the very last year the trete. ailianced from .5,9001. to 6,7001 That degree, account .for what the. Noble on. How had the smell traders of the trade? He did not mean, to the great traders;. he merely stated the quantity of material in the matte of former years, and the diminutiOn lot owing to the tax, betthe greater ised AI, the principal persona in the was any doubt, the accounts might He was not in the habit of trespass attention of the (louse, but he wish ttements. made nitb exactness.--[The ;lemma then read the lICCOUnti(3II we under geties paid by Brewell and Co., by [red, that in 1809, there car opposite sum of 1.9731.; in 1811,a sem of 1813, 53001. ;an increa se in 1816; ,9001.• and in 1818, 6.7001.] —With ts Ice thought he might fairly con- Gentlemen on an increase in their evidence in favour of the tax was price of leather.—[Neer, hear !)—, -igen from 15 to 20 per cent. since to raw material had been purchased at a The erticle,, however, hid • risen ex stated. The Leather Tax came out of the People. The tanners were for their duties even till .some time Id the article. Before lie was called !fitly- had his duties paid by the par. lon. Friend who had opened the de. entered so completely into the *abject, that link himself justified in ping into it For a century back the Leather no additional burdens, when almost had been loaded with them; and the in a very prosperous conditiqn. The had been granted had given so much specially to carriers and shoe-makers, declared it to be their desire that the should undergo no alteration, and that coder which a repeal of the additional It to be obtained were scandalously YAT said, that his statements had official Papers before the H presented on the 9th of March. lie the accounts of manufactured and en leather, and his argument was, that .terially tended to drive the trade out NGTON explained. ...111A-NI said, there were one or two had fallen from the Honourable Secre- Asory, which he could not conscien liess unnoticed. He had argued that 'epealed, another to an equal amount I.—[flear, hear9—This he denied. '1 —lt was proper to repeal this tax, necessary to impose another instead they proceeded on an occasion pre- The House had been pleased two repeal a much larger, though not a more Till this tax was 'repealed, Mini-' impossible to reduce any of their Esti- Imediately after' the repeal, they took ' , themes, and made considerable re. .etty of them. Why might they not their former conduct! Why might they leaf out of their own book ! Instead iiiitional tax, let them go to the Esta take them-down 180,0001. He ob. countenance of the Hon. Gentleman he Woods and Forests (Mt. Huskis. thought this a very absurd proposal. le the Estimates were gives in, but (mate had been obsoletely voted.— lishosents were to be kept up as might be necessary to tabatitute to the present ; but there was a Honourable Friend of his, whirls, if I have the effect of producing a much' ion of espence than 180,0001. namely, reduction of 5000 men from oar mill ishasent. He was astonished that the Hon. he Treasury should cite the trade of to prove the innosious nature of the tanners of the country, one and all, ion of the correspondent of the Mem. said, it the Tax was not repealed,' Id be ruined. lie was not a little this letter should have been given by 'Orman as a reason for his change of did not wish to impute toy improper lion. Gentleman—to impute such mo. lon. Member was certainly unparlia he confessed at the same time, that it that this letter should he given as a change of opinion.—[No, no! from Mr. .]-,Whlr, did not the Hon. Gent. give the tanner of Bristol as a maven for opinion? —[ Vo l nc !frogs Mr. 11. Davis] Wiwalf o , ...,~,,.,.. f , . if be did net give ; es he gees no seestnt4st slow kis etfte* Op ht. bed used no ergeassit . the But besides the tanners, interested, namely, the coeseeters I—i-Dentilentio - ibtr as/ mile 4 said eon ,t Secretary to ski Trawler, ' It falls on OW eon sismer—the ti: did not fall oh tlitt trade, bet on the consumer-4o tanner listinoietemlon iw complain, be could shift the tau from his stioulders to those of the consumer. But might •it hat happen that both consumers end tannertlifed groind to complain ? The consensus might Cmplain, 'because their ability to consume was diasioieltedl—bocasua by diminishing their abilitylo consume, the tax abridged their corn. forts. From the consumers being less able to buy from the tanners, the tanners might also km reason to complain—the consumers were suffering from the 'diminution' of their consumption, and the tanners from the diminution of, their manufacture. But hte .great objection against the tax was,• that it fell en equally—that it. pressed ,most severely on those who were least able to bear it. Every tea on the neces saries of life betl i i .direct tendency to increase the price of labour ;•and the effect of any tea like this, on a necessary of lifrewes immediately felt in the istereased vice of Meer of all those who lased While they were olden, thasefers, this pelerjestom of 180,0001. with one hind; they wore tinifgad to Put their other hand in their pocket to pay it. Bat besides, all the objections applied to it which applied to * Poll Tas, a •Pell Tax indeed it was, wept that it was laid on the feet instead of the head.—[Laitgh. ] --Every person paid so much, be his occopatien what it may. ;'he peasants, who wore the heaviest shoji,' were the'highest taxed bY it, as the tea was laid on by weight ; they paid, twice as much as those who now heard hita i owbo'wore tighter shoes; cos leather paying as, much as floe.. All the objectless against a Poll Tesaaerefore, epplied to it ; it was a Poll Tee of the worst kind, falling most bordettseme on the limr people, who were least Ore` to bear it. Mr. 11USKISSON **served, that 'the Honourable Gentleman who had jolt ea,s- down forgot the dif ference between the Property Tat and the Leather Duties. The formes was merely a part ,of the sup ply far the year, while the latter was solemnly pledged on the faith of Parliament to the public creditor, as a part of the permanent taxes carried into the Consolidated Fund. •The Right Honourable Gentleman said, he had listened to all the arguments made use of by the Noble Lord opposite, and by those individuals who supported his motion; he had also read the voluminous tracts poulisbed• by the Gentlemen connected with the leather trade, on this subject—and, after giving the most mature consider ation to both, he was prepared to say, that if the circumstances of the country justified the Legislature in revising all the taxes, and in removing those that were most obnoxious, the Leather Tax was not the one which, in the first instance, he would recommend to be abolished. There were marly others that operated more unfavourably on the consumer than the tax its question. Thil tax did not fall ott the tanners, but on the Public, who consumed the ar ticle. The tanner was the person on whom the tax was originally levied, but the Public alone paid it. Ile believed, that those who voted against the tax could not have read the statements of the . tanners, whose interests were said to be so immediately con cerned, or they would not have argued as they had done. The statements of those Gentlemen proceeded on this assumption, that the tax operated, not to the injury of the consumer, bat of the tanner. This tax had the misfortune to be laid on three years ago, at n period immediately preceding one of the greatest pressure and difficulty that this country had ever experienced. Having been then intro duced, and not having produced the full amount at which it was essimated, the Noble Lord came forward and made that a ground for repealing it. But, if he rested his case alone on the diminutiou of the tax, and not on the public pressure, or its operation in inducing individuals to give up the trade, he might have foond a moth stronger one, of the same description, for removing other tales.' The business of a nialtster had been already alluded to, and a Noble Lord had stated the diminution of licences for carrying on that business. Now the Leather Tax was nut in felt 'epere!ion fet a coil. siderable time—but the double duty on malt bad been for 15 or 16 years. During all that time the number of licences were decreasing. This the Noble Lord might attribute to the War Duty. But, if he Woke.' to the old Malt Duty, he would find a much greater diminution under it, of persons professing the busi ness of manatees, than of tanners, under the Leather Tax. Toe old Milt Duty, for fire years, produced on an average 3,000,0001. per annum—it wasre duced, and in the last year, it amounted to only 1,900,0001. The Noble Lord then, arguing On this principle of diminution, might have come down to to the House, and, finding the' diminution to ,hart taken placeitn - consequence of the Malt Duty being reduced one-half, call on the Legi.lai um to increase it. The Noble Lord (Compton) said he would vote for the repeal of this, and also of 1113 Salt Dates, because he wished to lay on a direct tag, in the nature of the Properly Tax. Bet he ought brat to know how his new allies meant to act. Perhaps he might give them his support on this occasion—but he doubted, st !te ther, in return, they would assist him with their votes, if any substitute, of the nature he had alluded to, were proposed. All that could be said with respect to the tanning business was, that it was a trade, which, like all others, bad suffered, but which now, like all others, was reviving. With respect to the repeal of the tax, it was to the consumer, to the whole body of the Public, they were to look, rather than to any particular body of applicants.' And he would maintain, that it would be for the benefit sit the Public not to repeal this tax—because the con sumer would not have the advantage of tbe diminu tion of the impost, et the same time that he would be ' obliged to pay some other tax, which it would Le UP. cessary to substitute. The operation of the tax was, to oblige the tanner to increase his stock and capital. if, their, the tax were removed, what would be . the effect ? Until the capital new employed could be taken from one branch of its industry and embarked in another, the manufacturer would be obliged to make a charge on the consumer, in proportion to the • capital he had embarked in the trade, and which he could nut transfer to some other line of business, - . .....P. - . , . . . ‘i•' 5... . , • .. .. • l. t--. . . ' 2 . ---- . • . 4 fte g td.ll)All,7l St • not i end to trespass ' Mr. LUSUINC 'above a momeot ern 'the attention of louse, tread: siderabtatecal lox afresh kinktrack • az bee a r y lk by a mop', testate to .1 r Written ofthe araenteors tobrffifit ifite homy anode agaiwat "0 tai • w • 1.,.) NA ltialbmeg lab. No -rd oitiobilid er3gi More surprised bb naZ j rnored the questror, and by othankflnnourable Honourable Mee Membere who totended to vote, as he did% the' that Hamemeabiesl ;•. repeal • , f tireNt'ditional Dories on 1-klltlgt. it ja - I en The 'abject: 'I ~_. kis ( Lord Deer lvaer4 laieltreatineNn.....nabila, It etptioned, that -- o ' - ... "is I 011,;11 ( 1143n...r5, "tbkt a Rations iconsidweed necessary -i teed of 41101.1111 by hie MsjestyMinisters; but 'repre.etstins l as hedid, During five years' a great commercial City, deeply interested in the found te.be 52,00 . present debate., he could not give a silent vote with. The discontinoau out stating, that the repeal of the additional Duties It was taking hot ' on Leather was of great import le many highly re- money, to put it spectabie persons connected with that made in Wor- man could lumen rester, tabu prayed to' be relieved from the burdrus posed in ita roe of it, that they might, at Info, upon equal . terms,nreet been pursued was, abe forelegs manufacturer in the marker s which they state of the Raves ' ' Were unable to do with the additional Duties in force, not do; for the • as they et present stood. Unzhould vote foe the re. leather charges I peal of those DOOM . dwell from. the' ' Mr. HART DAVIS rase, when the same .cries creased. Then • I ' were yenewed: lle begged to troehle the Use“ tanners bad.ditait • with a very few. words. Having formerly voted for That the trade the repo,! of this tax--(11cor !jrom the Opmsttion) might be koown 1 —be wished to state, that On had taken the riPpor- article was ham • . . trinity afforded by the recess to confer with the mast call to mind, ae • intelligent tanners; and they said; that they.did net state of tha lin. think the trade could benefit from the repeal of this that would show ' h " ` 'tie. ' —[Bear, hear!) —He had received a letter,. tanners. In the • which he then held in his hand, from a very eminent been Increasing, _ ' tanner. He knew him to be a person who hod a.• of that party ads perfect knowledge of his own interest.—(Loud would, in soma • loughier.)—With the leave of the House he would Lord had dwelt "•• read this letter to them.—(Galls of read, mingled been driven out 4 . . .with cries of disapprobation.)—lt was coached in find fault with tl ' ', these terms :---" As the Leather Tax is to seine be- the Tads. that the . . , fore the House in a few days, I beg to express a con., eaceeded that of , ' . viction, that neither the manufacturer nor the eon. of tanners was RC sumer is affected by the amount 6f it."—(!fear; means possessed ' - hear!)—" The 'trade Is certainly reviving."— trade. If there . " (Hear, hear !)—" It H sliced, that the duty has; . be referred to. I lately fallen off; but it should be remembered, that ing long on the at there was a great importation of bides a.short time ed to have states • before the additional duty was Imposed." Though; lion. Gentleman _ I ', in consequence of informatics!, he had received, he stood) of the do - . .' bad formerly voted for the repeal, be had since, on, which it appeared .f. more mature deliberation, adopted a contrary opi- their name a au .t' "ann. He could not, indeed, see how Government 3,0001.; and iu -• 'could possibly do without it, nor did he see how it in 1817, 5,9001 could he conveniently supplied by another tax. these statements Mr. P.'METIIUEN (as we understood) thought gratulate those f. ' that if all England shoold be searched, there would trade. Another '' not be found another tanner thinking like that one the increased pri ' whose opinion they had heard that evening. The price bad rim Lord COM PION said *few words, which we last year. The r . could not distinctly hear from the confusion of the reduced rate. T house. actly as he had a , Mr. MARRYAT said, that his vote would be an. of the pockets r ticipated when he stated that his opinion was guided not called upon by a far better criterion than any letter from any after they had sot ' single person; when it was recollected that there upon, he frequer ' hod been Petitions by hundreds laid before them , chas e r. ' His Ho _ . and every one enanimons In favour of the repeal of bate, had entered the Tax. It was much to be wished that the lion. be did not thin) Gentleman who had lately spoken against the Bill much farther. I • tied confined himself to particular facts and 'official Trade had had n t ' statements. It appeared from roma that had been ell other trades h ' laid before the House, that, in consequence of the trade was now in tax, the exportation of onmanufactured Leather had drawbacks that h i) been doubled, and the export of manufactured arti. satisfaction, ape clef had been diminished more than one-half. This that they had de appeared by papers presented to the Mouse on the Leather Laws she 9111 of March. There were amongst those accounts the pretences end . , the duties for five years before the additional tax, duty was sought and for the last five years. From 1808 to 1812 the false. duties were 5,600,0001. • and the export duty on un. Mr. MARRY , , , manufacture.' Loather tor five yeses to 1817, was been made from t nearly doubled. The reduction in the manufactured 'l s hii had been pi ' article would be found to be as he had stated. From had referred to tit 1813 to 1817 it was only about 1,000,0001. This manufactured lea reduction on one - side, and increase on the other, the tax had mater t ~ eras evidently caused by the additional Tax. Whet of the country. :, be had stated was further confirmed by t he fact, that Mr. LUSHIN the consumption of foreign raw hides amounted for. Mr. BROUG I mealy to a much greater number of late years. This things which had was another proof of alteration in the trade, in coo. eery to the Tress sequence of the Tax. The raw material was in a tiously suffer to 1 manner transferred to the foreign manufacturer, in if this tax was re consequence of the Tax. 'rho foreign manufacturer must he i:nposed. had an immense advantage over this country by yea. —[Hear, hear!l son of that additional duty. When the effects of but it was not ni ' that Tax were considered, it ought to be recollected of it. How had that it had become almost a system to assist the wages cisely similar ? iof poor persons out of the Poor Rates, so that the Tax years ago to reps was repaid by the rich to the poor in the shape of the oppressive tat. • ]Poor Rates. Government would find that they lint sters found it ins' .r more by indirect tasetion, than they gained by such mates, but imme impositions. The Hon. Gentleman, after shortly back all the E 4 • stating the precise proportion which the Leather ductions in matt a' , Tax bore to the rest of the revenue, concluded by now imitate limit expressing it as his opinion, that he could not con- not now take all histently with sound policy vot• otherwise than with of taking an addi it the Bill. blishmepts, and 1 Mr. BENSON, said, he was rather surprised to served from the r see the Honourable Member for Bristol so suddenly at the head of the i ' changing his sentiments on the subject add er disc u s - son), that he flat sion. [The Honourable Gentleman made a further --It was *rut . i observation on this subject, we thought in connection not Outs Estima . with the approaching election,' which we could not if the E stabils t ., hear for cries of question and order. ] He had visited they were, it 1 many parts where trades materially affected by the some other tax ) ._ • • tax were carried on, and was confirmed in the opi- motion of en H nion which he had before offered to the House. lie carried, would h was farther confirmed in that opining, by persons who greater fettucine 1 . : • had given 'widower to the Cooseittee, who con- a motion for are sidered the repeal of the tax as il necessary measure tary establishmet for the interest of the country. Secretary to the 4 . Mr. H. DAVIS explained. Ile was surprised to Messrs. Brewin t • bear that any Hon. Member Should rnske Poch in- tax, when the t _ einnations on his. conduct is appeared to have been with the *sceptic cast on him by the Hon. Member opposite. ber for Bristol, I i , The SPEAKER. was persuaded the House would their trade wool( *ree with him, that if the words of the Hon. Mem- astonished that 1 ber were intended to bear the construction put on the lion. Gentle. • them, they would be highly discreditable and im- opinion. He di, 1% - proper. If tnich was their intention, bethought it motives to the II • would be his duty not to allow them to pass in titres to any Ili • -silence.—( Hear, hear!) mentary. Bet 1 ‘.... , Mr. BENSON disavowed any serious meaning in did surprise him the expressions he had used. lie thought the under- reason fora char -standing that en election was not far distaut would Bart Davis.] — , excuse the allusion to the lion. Member, which he the letter of de had merely made in jilt. his change of opii • , ts, TON bad been led t. asks eon, hettiAirpr. B. !to tee, 'object, and ems, i f Hist -therottewerMis ikoompahst -40.4 opiniontekh . lese real groiss, Ndthing --L*llighl--.lle Abel) to Aar the statement of*. galiseW Letter. MN' Ear Sandwich_ He in h i m a s k not another class i - p I p =a COMPTON esplained. Ile certainly wish,' der 1 divot Sat—but he bad never intimated dot h wowtd tae for the repent of the Salt Duties. Thts Moose then divided, when there eppee r , For the tetood read* - !so Agalubt_it _ .s • - Majority (hr Milliners —4 After some conversation. between Sir J. Nawrosy and Mr. BATUUtST, Mt. LUSHINGTON presented the Report of the Comaiissiou on the Fees of the Court of Chancery. • ADJOURNMENT. Lord CASTLEREAGH, in consequence of d i Royal Marriage, moved that the House on its risi ts do adjourn to Widnesday.-o,dered. It was ordered, that Committees have leave to sit, Oetsaithstantiing the Adjournment; and that sick Private Bills as bad been ordered to be reed a sec on d time tomorrow, should be read a second time oa Wednesday. On. a question of Sir JOHN NEWPORT'S, spotting the Duties on Four-wheeled Carriages is Ireland, The CHANCELLOR. of the EXCHEQUER said, that it was in his contemplation to propose it Measure of relief from the Afuties on the species of Carriage most in use in that country. • • Mr. SMYTH presented tt Petition from the Una versify of Cambridge, praying that the Copy-rigig Bill might not pass into, a law, and to be heard by . Counsel agalost , it. Sir JOHN NEWPORT moved for the Novas -. of Causes tried In the Assistant Barsistere Courts to, Ireland, op to the tat of 1818; and tlss Number of Appeals frototht udgments, with*. home thoee Appeals ; Number of Declare._ tiou in the Superior Courts, in.ubich the sum wallet! *hive 251. • ....trOSTER said, the Hon. Baronet cured answer his object by this motion, as the sties sated in Declarations were far above the amongst really in dispute. ► Sir J. NEWPORT then withdrew his motion, is order to amend it. ftDONs. Mr. F. DOUGLAS said, as he understood no appo. k.sition would be matte to his motion for a repeal of the Fees on Pardons under the Great Seal, he shoeld make only a few observations. The amount of the Fees to be paid on all sock Pardons was much greater .than those who had not taken the trouble to mph* 'into the subject could probably imagine. They amounted to 1101. on each Pardon. It was obvious, that the great majority of those who received Par. dons, could not pay this erpetice, and the Hosea might be curious to know how the drfficolty had been got over. In fact, very few of those to whom mercy was extended, obtained this complete Paklois, which alone could make them competent witnesses in a Court of Justice. There had been Only twelve Pu. dons during•the last ten years, and he was convinced, that ies consequence, great impediments had been thrown in the way of Public Justice. lie could not better illustrate this than by staling the circumstance which first called his attention to the subject. In Nye (district of Osfordshire with which he Wes coeoected, some of the worst sort of cri nes had been committed for some time with impunity, and there was at last a prospect of bringing the perpetrafots to penishmeat • by . means of the evident' of a min who had formerly been convicted of a felony. The Act of Geo. 111. 31, which male persons who had hfen convicted of larcenies conspetout witnesses did n..t apply to felonies, and it was necessary to sue out the Portion under the Great Seal. 'file litotes w hocotiductedtheprosecutioa were however, astonished, when they found that the espence of this Pardon wid] he 1101. in addition to the other heavy expenses which they were obliged to incur, end they were almost deterred from pursuing their object ;, finally, they did proceed, and Nero thus subjected to a considerable burthen. The lima Member observed, that if there .were any thin in the case or character of a person convicted which rendered it proper to. extend to him the mercy of the Crown by the grant of a Pardon, it was too much to say that such person should be compelled to lay the elpplice which at present attached to such a greet. • To remove this rail was the object of the Bill which • he tneint to bring forward. Ile dial not think it pro per to extend the provisinas of this Act of the 31st of the King to felotdi, and therefore he fel the neces- • sky of another course of proceeding, in order to guard against the mischief, on the one hand, of ale towing the Otilie.ll of the Crown to devise ;winds?t► belierit from 'the eatension of the Royal mercy; Pea _on the other, to'prrvide that persons ab told tot be • exempted from Ras mercy, merely because they had - no pecuniary rei cis. Tue lion. Mesabi. concluded -with movin4 for leer+ to bring it; a Bill to diminish th • expellee of Piodo The ATTORNE 1-GENERAL said, that he did not mean so oppose. the motion, but from what the lion. Mover had stated, he felt it necessary to sub mit a few •observations. The Patents for Pardee, t'te of•j?ct..ol which axisa seaters convicts to their civil rights,.• were Patents under the Great Seal, which were, in feet, s thject to no more expellee than was incurred for all other Patents under atte• same Seal, and that eapence Was o.cesary for purposes easily in he explained. One part of this eapence was tequired to reward the Clerks in office, for their trouble in doing the business connected wi is these patents—another to pay the Stamp Duties iw• posed by the Legislature. Those duties on nen patent amounted in one Office to 61., and in another to 301. The portion of the sum received for the warrant of a Patent of Pardon in the Secretary or State's Office was invested in what was called the Fee Fund, out of which the Clerks engaged in this Wail& of the Nattiness of that office, and the Law Miceli of the Crown, were rewarded for th. it trouble. — There was also a part of the expeoce ircuried 1.•• a patent paid into the Privy Seat Office. 13,11 it s h , nl.,- , be understood, that the greater port, if tot the yawl* of the expense stated by the Honourable Sieve , dependently of the Stcnip,Detier, was paid for tut, actually doe in tie se.erel offices to which he had alluded. The prepr.ety of providing a rem' sieratiost fur such (townie or performance of duty, was, deed, felt by the Crown itself ; for whenever it wq , found absolutely necessary to paidats Convects, mull a view to render them competent witnesses (or pru• owing the ends of justice, the sr:pence of s uch Pardons was paid by the Crown itself. ---Bat where a Pardon was granted from favour, he did- net mean from Improper favour ; but tbtogf‘ - 'Awed Clerks to do takile4 - _ ' el j.• M the •for 61 usight (Patine pinta favour, able I made Of to b The TA: a Bill ' My: Cotton tlityrisr bierf kb* dared I, • Dr. 1 I lion 111sVot 1 is, • Al . a Two - I pet r, ~w~~ ~ • :*1 !r7'l.--Tf _.~_ t f l Y I the ti . ' of al l iota . ononffoit before • 1 To rips' Mioiitei has boo ..contias4 - THO aril last tdil . debate, the pm are go bfinistet by 136 be gigot . etoplitlei the Revs it now 3 withost press ;sec Fobtic. sitisatiot satilta is can be duly roc State C Lords. c sr erase 1_ • loot dicta , to iews !reit brooglit motional • the Km end deal Of the S w.d drs+ maser" tasetios testing d Gen ties soldier. the sill Duouai impossa isstaoce for wiiiel tb*.Estil of tbo 6( citAihr, °natio* 111311.101 satiafactc lays, on `,(it was a 'S i t.. . . :ed. fie certainly wished never intimated that h e "miler the Salt Duties. 411, 461,1 when there appeared. IMAMWNW 14011IdIi 11. tug -_-‘ Clerks "tween Sir J. Naweeae t• de t -O.rkrl Ilesite o th. Report erbaorttythe !te trawl :he Court . LENT. . ewaarwrm ill conseqeence of the rellesee the House on its risin g 1 411 e Seer .o(dered. he the A mittees have leave to sit,vete • toment ; and th a t seek ter lab' ered to be read a 'Ke s t might b read a second time ea dietitian wanted FIN NEWPORT'', re , favour. ir-wheeled Carria ges i s °Werth able to ,f the EXCHEQUER ma de a etnpiatiosi to propo se e granted lollies on the species s(, or to bet The Petition from the Ugh. Tee log that the Copy-rig tension sw, and to be heard by a Bill to •,. • moved foe the Netlike: ' 1111 preps sot Barsis ..} ters' Courts le, Me 1 . 7 0r, 1818; aid this • Cotton edgmeitts, with the „ti* tiya feev e the Number of Declare.. r s • bed kw * in which the bum wale* , ' d are d to • • Dr. P he Hon. Baronet cell a / e' en -yid tit motion, as the sine Vlst'of fil far above the 'mom withdrew hie motion, in • ALL e Two PJ NS. ‘s,uar, s he understood no eppo. st. - . 11 . 1111) 1: 1 °satin° for a repeal : he Glens Seal, he Amid is. The amount of the , fibs ardotts was much greater Pr . let the trouble trouble to enquire s Ceeleb6 •bahly Imogene. They Oyer Co 'ardor. it was obvious, those who received elf. • 'pence, and the Hems , I- A. I w the doificelty had bee of those to whom mew complete Paklon, elikh smpetent witnesses hie d been Only twelve Per* ...I-- it •• s, and he was convinced, impediments had Imo :f I Justice. He afield met ' the staling the circeonstaaco 9, us to the 'object. kshe . 111010 4 , which lie was comtectid, of all ki nes had been committed ~ naldiesint "tib A s t ;pe a t ad raf t o h t e s r t e o vi gni t ehme last a s t • 71::h n ,s e 07f . a . G . f :e pt r o isri . . i:jits.toiaptc.6ll:e: i . ' ' .