The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1825-12-02 00:00:00

r i (Weak , MI X hem the M ho of whW V ips=ght• the sit.watiWa bill, fie spirits aAtheter. . . . . ... Daughter of fileikapreolj a ltrpirits beer, he., had hero dedivaed to eh t of V., but she could PM not my boa mu; le. twas no , 1,3,,,,, Jolene* the Jury that by law the flaitstir we Dot so retreat the spirits. The plaintiff's dellsmd Wm* 111111 for than 21. ; they . couLl not, more thou this sum, but for u much chey gi = Jury, a ft er cosoahtng a few mir.utes, gave a verdict for the 01011.--Thimares two guineas. Loma Curry Jurricu exnremed considerable displeasure wt Ole Jury for their verdict "I am v e ry s or r y," sa id hi s Lord sh ,to that you have returned this verdict. I consider it to he a mo.I pernlcirms practise for publicans to give credit to working men to Dish an amount, and by your verdict yew have sanctioned thj= „ co:' , '''' COOIiT OF COMMON PLIIAS, Taunt likets Staiags after MicAmbito. Term, lallsre Lord Chief Justice BRIM and Common Juries. MIRO T. CRANDICRLAYIII. ?bistros as hone diverted to be tried by the Vice-Chancellor, to dalenolas the yawners whether the detrulant, as executrix of her law mother. mai indebted to'the plaintiff, in right of his wife, in *earn of OWL which it was alleged by the plaintiff had been lent . by hi. wife, previous le his marriage with her, to the mother, but h;l41 it was atErmed on the part of the defendant was a gift, and tot a loan. t VAURIRAIN stated the facts of the case to be shortly than— re. Chetahs,lapse the testatrix, formerly Insides! in lient-reeth awl kept a school there, in which her • tleaghters, tomes Sad Ann, satiated her, receiving from terse a willey of. a-year. In the course of the year dim MOM hod melt lam of 050/. left to them by will, of Mak beetbdo teas ells executor. The mother's ti 9 rhea be. Meableabarramad, her two children advanced her money from tined dm, until, at length, they had both lent her the whole of tinifffneopes. The sister Frances, baring experienced some diffi culty is obtaining her money from her brother, had been obliged to *Mg to a prolessionel gentlernan of great respectability to recover it bother. At that time the plaintiff was clerk to that gentleman, and the frequent hitter less that took piece between him and Mira Fleeces Ctiamberfayne iu the course of the liminess ripened into .as intimacy, which at length led to their marriage. The lady li:d Mein attained the age of 35 years, and was therefore fully compe. teat to judge for herself in an affair of that kind. or course, he this marriage all personal property became vested in the husband. l'poo finding that his wile had lent her fortune to her mother, he in de appFeation for it. It not being, however, in the power of Chanaretlayne to pay it, she applied to Mr. Parker, an attar. ney, to make an arrangement with her son.in.law, that interest should be paid him until Mrs. ('hamberlayne was able to raise safficient mercy to pay or the principal. This, however, not being can Huh with, it was proposed and agreed upon that the plaintiff' en'l his wife Auld board and lodge with their mother, for which 'hen should be charged l&01. per annum, which was to go to the lie lid, eon of the debt, and the plaintiff did accordingly go and litre in him Chamhertsyne's house for some short time. But as Air. and Aim Drew could not very well agree, Mr. Drew separated himself from her, leaving his wife with her mother until that old bely died. The other deughtcr having been appointed her eat su r x, she became entitled as such to all her mother's property, .•übject to the payment of her just debts. A suit in Chancery be. ing .aammenced, the present question had arisen,whether the defend. ant. as such executrix. was or was not liable to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 6001. which had been lent to the mother in the manner be ii.d stated. Upon the evidence of Air. Parker, confirmed as it *old be by a gentleman of the name of Edwards, the Learned Ser.ceant contended that he should be clearly entitled to a verdict to th e plaintiff: M. Parker and Mr. Edwards were then examined. Their tee 'tim went to support the statement made by the Learned So ,!.ant. lir. Sergeant TADDY, on behalf of the defendant, said he sh add be able very satisfactorily to prove that this money waa a gi t by the daughter to her brother; and that it was never contern glided at the time or since, either by the plaintiff's wife or her ai,ter, as anything but a gift. True it was his Learned Brother lead put into the witness.box two gentlemen, who spoke of the poor old apeman having treated this as a debt, and that she had ex. premed her anxiety to thiChINC it : but the Jury would look at the circumstances under which there admissions, a. they were termed, were made. lire was a poor, infirm, and aged woman. threatened to i e arteired and thrown into prison by her son.in.law, a man who, by his conduct in first marrying the daughter for the Rake of the fortune lie now pretended he supposed her to pots (although he should prove that he was told, before he married Alias Chem in:Jayne. that she had no property); then threatening a distressed mother with incarcentinn, which at her age was calculated to secelerate her death ; and at length, finding that he could not sue e:ell in his object, notwithstanding he had declared he would not intre a stone unturned till he got the money, deserting the woman whoe: ha was hound to shelter and protect ; and now &gaits, after it., ell lades death, harassing the sister of his wife by involving her to a Chancery s alt; and all this for the iniquitous purpose of unjustly obtaining possession of that money which had been de.. voted by an affectionate daughter to comfort and cherish erfortutrate and aged parent in her latter days, before he any legal tide to her property, and wire" she was sole mistress of all s!R possessed. A man who acted thus was entitled to no favour !men an English Jury. What, under such circutnatances,might not the fern of an old and nervous woman prompt her to do ? She knew eNe hal received the money ; and no doubt tier parental care for her ..'niltren made her anxious tn restore it ; at all events, she had the dre idfal alternative of a gaol before her eyes ; what would a per son woo for lilt yet: • had lived in the world with an unsullied reputation, rot do to avoid such a fate at last ? Would then the Jury rely upon words extorted from fears thus excited? Would they give credit toe case thus supported, when on the other hand they would have not only the evidence of the sister (for she was in some degree interested) but the testimony of a most re. spectabie woman_, whose evidence could not be suspected, and who far ruby years had been clerkly intimate with the family of the ll:eamberlaimea, and had on frequent occasions heard Airs. Drew, brore her marriage with the plaintiff, say that site had given all brae fortune to her mother? The first witness he should call would be the defendant herself, whom the Vice-Chancellor had directed stottld he examined. If the case, indeed, depended upon her single testimony, there might be room to apprehend that the hits. rat which that lady had in the result of the cause might have an undue influence on her mind; but corroborated as she would be by snottier person, there would be sufficient to warrant the Jury in git rag credit to her evidence. Tee LORD Cutter JUSTICZ took occasion to remark, that the practice of examining parties who were directly interested in the route Was wholly peculiar to Courts of Equity, and he for one, with all deference to the Learned Judges who presided in those Courts, could not but disapprove of the course taken when issues were directed to be tried in Courts of Law ; namely, the ordering ut Coutt to examine the parties in the suit ; nor was h e th e osly Judge who entertained the opinion of its impropriety. Lord L'llenbirough had said that such orders ought not to be binding on the Lommoi Law Judges. His Lordship hoped it would not be lung before an alteration took place in a practice which, in his mind, was most objectionable, and tended to work great mischief. Arm Chemberlayue was then examined. lier evidence was in accordance with the statement of the Learned Sergeant. She said that when the plaintiff first paid his addresses to her sister he was told that she had no fortune. His reply was that he did not want to marry her for money. He represented himself to be a partner in the house where he was living, though it appeared be was only a dart.. She and her sister always considered the money advanrod to their mother as a voluntary gilt, for which they never took any 'eve:lets. The advances were made in consequence of the mbar reseed circumstances of their parent. She was 63 years old when thl plaintiff Married, and was very nervous indeed. Shc had heard the plaintiff say he would leave no stone unturned to get the money, upon which hit wife observed—" No. Drew, you can never get it, for it was a gift before I married you." 'Llr-• Vaughan was then examined, who said she bad often hood Mrs. Drew speak of her having given money to her mother. Or. berrrant VADODAN, in reply, contrasted the evidence on the one aide with that oo the other, and said he was assured the Jury would feel it their duty to turn the Peale in favour of his cart. It was • case peculiarly for their decision, and he was quite satisfied he could wide in their intelligence. in their know stodge of the world, and in their candour. to try it most correctly. They would not be misled by die appeal of his Learned Friend ; bet, after orating every due allowance for those kind feelings which miht prompt children to aid their parent, they would divest their minis from the inffirence of a species of mistaken generosity, asul judge fairly and dispassienstelv between the parties. His Learned Friend seemed to think that ,beesuae d.c plaintiff might have been a 'Mamma husband, there would be no great harm in their snowing • sort of pious fraud upoo their consciences, and give a verdict agiinst him. But they had nothing to do with the chs. voter of the husta:.d. Did they, or did they not, believe Mr. Parka and Mr. Edwards? If they did (anti there was nothing that mild impeach the character of either of these gentlemen) they tirit. fist a verdict for Lis The LORD Cuter Jusitr.r. In summing up the evidence to the Jury, ntr.erved that ettboni f „,b this was • case cloning from the Cry; of chancery, he had no knovrlndge whatever of any thing cyst had prised there. It would be in his judgment a very good pi* Ire I , * the bids and answers In such cases were to be given to t h e j u dg elet iit:f might know what had trsaspired in that COOT. It, howeter, &witted to he important io some snit pend ing there, to know whether Mn.e Chamberlayne was indebted is Iter Life" in the coin of MIL to Mrs. Drew, and as the Court of .Chancery had no power. to receive Mu vow evidence. theques 800 4Y at dto be tried Li a Court of Common Law, and it was the duty of the Jury to cry by their verdict whether Airs. Cram. bertay lye was eis indebted or not. The principal point they had to was, whether the words and conduct of the old lady, u listed tythe plaintiff's *imago, were the result of fear working on ienoeveus naiad, or thecormetion of lice being legally liable to re fuel the mole; His bordsliis having recapitulated the evidence, the Jury, atter consulting meatier aortic minutes, retired, and were 1 1 1110USeerly two hours. On their ;morn they said they era of erasion the: the money was • gift and not a lota, sod accordingly .ant.: a verdict tar the defendant. POPIARTT 1. STOCRDALE. .11%.. We. !to action brought by the plaintiff; at printer. to reenvor from Lhc itetrodmit, u publipinsr of ills notorious fin/wits 4/ Mar. riet(e Wilson, the sum of 96L 145., being the balance of an account between them, to which the defendant pleaded the general issue. Mr. Sergeant VALIOHAN, in stating the ease to the Jury, ob served, that the plaintiff was a respectable master-printer, living in Jewin-street, who had been compelled to bring his action against Mr Stockdale, for printing certain parts of a work with which he (Sergeant Vaughan) was not acquainted, but he had been told it was a week which had ministered much to the taste of the public. His Learned Friend (Mr. Sergeant Wilde) had, he per ceived, one of the copies before him, which, he dared say, formed part of hie library. (A laugh.) The circumstances of the cane were very short. The plainti ff contra c t e d w i t h th e def e ndant to print WOO copies of a number of the memoirs, weekly, for which the defendant was to pay on every Saturday the sum of 61., ati when the whole of the numbers should be completed, ke was to give his acceptarce at three months for the balance. The sale of the work wan certainly prodigious. In the first place the plain tiff was to supply 10110 copies a week, then it was to be MO ; af terwards 0000, then SOW, anti at length no less than 17,000 copies per week of this work, which, he W. 113 sorry to may, had been de scribed by ide. Stockdale in a n o th er pl ace ( t h e Court of King's Bench) as one of the best works (the Holy Scriptures excepted) that estritad appeared. Tt was to his fortune by the salt of it ; hut while he did so, he was apt to forget those by whose labour and instrumentality his money was matte. When railed upon to pay, Ite used to make all sorts of frivolous excuses, till at length a balance ac....ited, due to the pliintiff, to the amount of M. 14s. He should be able to show that this work, in its pro gram, became so greatly in demand that it at last became necessary to print it by machinery, and he did not know whether, in the end, it was not requisite to have a stcam.engine erected, such was the avidity with which the corrupted tuts armlets devoured this no torious and infamous work. The son of the plaintiff was then called to prove the agreement entered into between his father and the defendant. A written do cument was handed in as being the contract on which the action was founded ; it appeared to be signed by the witness himself, but it was not stated to have been so executed on behalf of his father. Mr. CHITTY was putting questions o the witness with a view to show that although the contract was so signed yet it was really the contract of the father and not the son, when Mr. Sergeant IV ILDE (on behalf of the defendant) objected to this mode of examination, and contended that it WWI not in the power of the plaintiff first of all to put in a contract which pur. ported to be entered into by the sun OS principal, and then to ex mice that son for the purpose of showing he was acting only as the agent of the father. Parole testimony could not be admitted to alter the liabilities which the contract itself had created. . Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN said that the agreement which had been put in was not the one on which his case rested. The Learned Sergeant then put In another document, but which was expressly similar to the previous one, except that the latter was signed by the defendant only. Mr. Sergeant WILDS contended that these were hut duplicates of each other, and could not be separated. There must be two parties to a contract, and in order to ascertain who were those parties, his Lordship would be obliged to look at both these documents, and then It would appear that the son, and not the father. who was the plaintiff in this action, was the contracting party. He would not repeat his argument that no parole evidence could be allowed so alter the nature of this agreement, because what ho li,ul already urged had not been answered. The Loan CHIEF JUSTICF. observed, that in the case of brokers of the City of London, it was well known that they might be examined to prove that the contract was entered into by them on behalf of another party who was the principal ; but that was be cause brokers could not act as principals, although in point of fact they often did. But the distinction which his Brother Wilde had taken was certainly a very forcible one ; and although his Lordship had an opinion upon the subject, yet after the case which had oc curred at Guildhall, where evidence of this kind Was received, he would rather not take upon himself to decide the point at Niai Prius, but wished it to be reserved for the consideration of the Court shove. He would therefore allow the plaintiff to proceed with his examination, giving Mr. Sergeant Wilde leave to move to set the verdict aside and enter a nonsuit, if the Court should be of opinion that such evidence was not admissible. Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN said he had other criticize, as to put at least of his demand tilt the contract. The LORD elms' JUSTICE—Let us hear it then. _ . The witness then went on to state, tit it the work was done by his father to the extent mentioned in the bill delivered, and that the prices affixed were under the usual charges in the trade. Some letters were then put in and read. The first was from Stockdale to the plaintiff, dated 31sy 10, 1025, in which, after ac knowledging the receipt of a note with an enclosure, he proceeded to abuse the plaintiff in the most unmeasured terms, designating hie conduct as being the most scandalous in the overcharge* he had made, and that his whole procedure proved him to be a great scoundrel. lie had, however, no wish to embarrass the plaintiff; and was willing to pay him what was reasonable. The plaintiff's answer, dated the 1 lth, stating that his only wish was to settle the thing fairly, and that he would call upon the defendant the next day, was then read. The witness proceeded to say, that he and his father did accord ingly wait upon the defendant, when the plaintiff cfferel to come to terms if defendant would accept a bill for the balance, to prevent any troublesome proceedings or any unpleasantness between them ; hut the defendant said he would not come to any terms with him—that he (the plaintiff) bad behaved like a scoundrel, sad that he would not have any thing to do with hint. The defendant kept the bill of exchange, and would not give it up to the witness's father. The several orders for the delivery of the numbers to a Mr. ' vans, a bookbinder, sent by the defendant to the plaintiff, were n put in and read. he witness said, the articles were delivered by his father to 111 r. vans, according to Mr. Stockdale'srequert. On his cross-examination, the witness said he frequently signed his father's name in matters where his father was a party. Some of the numbers now handed to him were printed by his father, and some were not. Mr. Sergeant WILDE—Have you any prosecutions against you for priming this work P Witness—No, Sir; my father is only Mr. Stockdale's servant. The LORD CHIEF Al/TICE—You are not to think that be- _ - ...... - cause he was only Mr. Stockdale's servant, he was not therefore guilty of gross misconduct in aiding in the printing and publication of such a scandalous work as this. One or two other witnesses were then examined as to the reason ableness of the charges, which closed the plaintiff's case. Mr. Sergeant WILDE, in addressing the Jury for the defendant, said he would state the reason why Dlr. Stockdale resisted the plain tiff's demand. A bill was delivered to him by the plaintiff. mak ing certain charges tnr the printing of the work, the name of which the Jury had already heard. He disputed those charges. A second bill was produced, varying the nature of the items, but terminating in the same result, the amount demanded being the same. Mr. Stockdale conceived those charges to be exorbitant, and the demand unjust, and for these reasons he had resisted the payment. Plaintiff complained that thedefendant had refused to accept a bill for the balance due, according to the terms of the agreement, and that therefore he was liable to this action. Ile (Tile. Sergeant Wilde) insisted that no bill of exchange was presented to the defendant for acceptance until after this action was brought. But an attempt had been made to bolster up the case by a refusal since the com mencement of the action. The first mention of the bill was in the letter dated the 10th of May. ()n the 12th of May the plaintiff called upon the defendant, and then it was that the refusal took place. But this action was commenced on the 11th of May; there fore the Jury would be excused on the present occasion from con sidering any other question, inasmuch as the right of action not having accrued when the writ was issued, the plaintiff could not be entitled to their verdict. These were the facts as contained in his instructions. But if he had no other than these, he still should feel it his duty to call the attention of his Lordship and of the Jury to the nature and quality of this wort, and ask whether a Court of Justice should protect and countenance a man in enforc ing his demand for printing one of the meta scandalous (and he did not forget that he was ,Mr. Stockdale's Counsel when he ap plied that epithet), he would say one of the moat scandalous and vile works that ever issued from the public press; a work deeply tb be deplored that it ever was produced—for not only the reputations of private individuals, but the very character of the country itself, must in a great degree hare suffered from it ; for when he looked into that book to-day, for the first time, and heard that frum 1,000 to 10,1100 copies were bought with a voracity anti an appetite that was astonishing, it told how poworfully it had worked ha way over the public mind ; a work on which he should have thought no two men could have spoken but with indignation. Thloe who censured the production should not foster it, by their patronage, their protec tion, and their perusal. The LORD CHIEF JusyrcE said, hitherto he knew nothing of^he work, but as his Learned Brother had opened it, he certainly now thought lie must take notice of it. lie felt himself bound to look after the public morals, and from what had been amid respect ing this work, it was kis duty to see whether it was such a thing as could be charged for. Mr. Sergeant WILDE then proceeded to comment with great severity on the Immoral tendency of the work, and pointed out the announcement of other publications on the covers of each number , the very titles of which were too abominable to repeat. They had had robberies of all sorts, but a new species of plunder was risen up in modem times, by the means of that press a which they all looked for instruction, and which the must all deplore to sce pro stituted to such infamous purposes. But that press had been made. the engine of the greatest oppression and injustice—of violating the privacy of families—of obtruding upon the most secret affairs of men ; setting the parent against the child, and etc:ling suapicion and jealousy between the husband and site; and all this with no other view but of extorting money from the timid, who would rather purchase the silence of the alandcrer, than risk the torture which his venom would inflict, though every drop were distilled from the deepest sink of malignity and filsehood. The Louts CHI El JUST ICE— . llmther Vaughan, is not this the history of a common prostitute, and does it trot contain an account of her amours with certain persons ? I have no hesitation in eaying. that no one who assists In putting forth such a work to the public can recover for the price of his labour in a Court of Justice. The plaitittff has lent hnnself to mint this infamous work, which has a double objtct—that of corrupting yruth and extorting money, or of making a vast profit by the publication of its blander. His, Lltdship regretted that any portion of the press should have been so far debased and perverted from its right use as to have had a work of this abominable description issue from it; and he hoped and trusted that a publication of so black a character would not be permitted any longer to disgrace the British press, the teneftts of which, when properly used, could not be too highly appreciated.i It was the child of the Government, and Governments could not exist without it. No man could era see that wonder foil agent of ' good (ifs* used) diegrarsd, without feeling considerable pain. I Aare now GOthillg more to do than to call the paintit, . - ' - '44011m• A., THE BRITISH PRESS. Mr. Sergeant VAITCILIAX begged to say that he joined most heartily in all the sentiments that had fallen from his brother Wilde, and he would applaud them to the very echo that should applaud again. The work, he agreed, was the very atiblimate of poison ; but did his Lordsh , p think that it was in the power of this 3lr. Stockdale, this late repentant sinner, to plead its im morality and base tendency.? Was this man, who — The I.OIID CIIIEF JUSTICE.—Yes. certainly, anybody may. The plaintiff was accordingly Nonsftited. We cannot help observing that the smallness of this Court is more and more the subjmt of complaint among persons who have busi. ness to transact in it. -.The confusion anti noise that constantly annoy the Court and Interrupt its proceedings are wholly attri butable to the confined space in which the Judges, the Learned Sergeants, the Juries, the witnesses in waiting, anti the attorneys, are obliged to crowd themselves. It is an extraordinary fact, that there is scarcely a Court of cartes throughout the provinces that is so incommodious as the High Courts of Justice at West minster HO. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, THURSDAY, Dec. I. Sittings after Michaelmas Term,belbre the LOUP CYlfir BARON waraiai The Court, during the whole of the day, was occupied in trying an information against a soap-boiler in Rosemary-lane, for sending nut soap without certificates. Cases et a similar nature were so ones berme the public during the Sittings after Trinity Term, that a detail of the present would be useless and unimportant. 111011 COURT COURT OF DELEOATES, THUZIDAT, Diu. 1. Drs. STODART, DODSON, LEE, J. ADDAIII, and DAURIONY, preaided. nniscole v. Baiscoi. At the opening of the Court, Dr. STODART inquired whether the act of petition assigned to be brought in three days ago by Sir W. Btiacoe's Proctor had been brought in? Mr. JENNEII answered that it had been brought in two days before Court-day. The Register—lt has been brought in, my Lords. Dr. STODART—Then we have nothing to do but to order that a warrant be issued to the Common Law Judges, desiring that the cause may be heard before the whole Commission, with as little delay as possible. Ater a momentary pause, Dr. STODART continued—There is another circumstance which lam directed by my Learned Assistants to state. One of the in dividuals concerned in this case called at the house of one of the i Learned Judges in this cause. The Learned Judge, of course, very properly refused to hold any comtnuni:stion with that party. It was necessary that this should be stated. and also necessary that we should give our opinion, that the individual who called upon the Learned Judge alluded to, by so doing, though perhaps into luntarily, conducted himself in an irregular and improper man ner. There is nothing else before the Court : it is therefore ad journed. Dr. LEE—At the same time I most say, that I am not permit. ted to make my own statement. The Learned Judge would not permit me to speak in my own defence. W hilst Dr. Lee was making Ibis observation his Learned Col leagues retired, and the Court adjourned. COURT OF REQUESTS, VINE-STREET. MEMOIRS OF HARRIETTE WILSON. HARMS V. bTOCKDALE. In this ease, which was heard I;efc;reihe — ommissioners at the above Court, the decision of a point of some interest to booksellers and publishers took place—being the obligation of giving back per fect books, or parts, in exchange for imperfect copies. Mr. John Joseph Stockdale, " of Colonnade fame," was sum moned to this tribunal by Mr. Michael Harris, who is himself a bookseller and stationer, residing in King.street, Westminster, to answer to a demand for refusing the payment of Bs., in contraven tion of the custom of the trade, and under circumstances as seldom have occurred. It now appeared that Mr. Harris, who is the com plainant, had purchased three parts of the Memoirs of liarsiclie Wilson of the tiefendant for a gentleman, by whom they were re. turned aa being in an imperfect state. The complainant in copse quenee applied to the defendant to exchange the copies he had pre. cured from him, which he positively refused to do, asserting that he would only give complainant the leaf, who might afterwards make good the deficiency himself ; but the complainant refused to take the book io that condition, when the defendant said, that he should charge complainant sixpence a day for warehouse room. ' Mr. Stockdale, in his defence, said, that it was a regular thing for the venders of publications to make up such deficiencies, and he objected to the parts being cut open. He asked, that supposing a coach were bought, and had gone a journey, and a nut was found to be loose, was the coach to be returned on the manufacturer's hands merely on that account ? The three Commissioners were decidedly of opinion that the case of the coach bore no analogy to the present. Mr. Harris here submitted that he recollected a ease quite con. trary to the statement of the defendant as to his liability to make good imperfections. lie had recently bought some publications of Mr. Limbird, in the Strand, which happened to be imperfect, but upon his applying to that publisher they were immedi ately exchanged. The complainant now exhibited the book in its imperfect state, and put it to the Commissioners whether they, or any one among them, would buy it in that condition ? The Commissioners said, one and all, that they certainly would not. Mr. Stockdale—But, Gentlemen. the entire parts of Harriette Witsotes Memoirs were cut open when returned to me. Mr. Harris—And how could the gentleman know they were im perfect till he had cut them open ? This closed the case, and an order was made against the defend ant (%Ir. Stockdale) for the payment of six shillings, with costs, who seemed to be much disconcerted at the desision of the Com missioners. POLICE. MANSION-HOUSE. Yesterday the Lordilll4Oinereivetran;tlrfrom a Spanish Colo. nel, who had fled from his own country on account of the atill-ex isting heat of political animosity. He requested that some MIS. tance might be rendered to him until the President of the Corn. mittee for the relief of the Spanish and Italian refugees, without whose signature relief could not be given, should return to town. The Loan MAYOR ' who has been daily receiving letters of this description, and who h as been put under many personal contribu tions, sent to Mr. Freshfield, the Secretary, in order to Inform him of the increasing demands, and to learn what steps the committee were about to take. Mr. FRESIIFIELD apprehended that the number of applicants would rather increase than diminish as the severity of winter ap proached. The present claimant was one of those who had recently come over to Ireland, but although the Committee had found it necessary to pass a resolution against relieving any of the refugees who were not in the country at a time specified, that resolution had never been acted upon. The public contributions were therefore dealt out to all whose distresses were great, and who were found not to have misrepresented themselves in making their applications. The LORD MAYOR Paid he knew that a resolution to that effect, although necessary to be adopted as a rule, could not have been generally acted upon. He had exitnined the papers which the present applicant and other military officers of rank had brought with them, and he had no reason to question the truth of the statement, that there was no safety for the emigrants in their own country, and that there was no alternative but that of taking refuge here. lie asked Mr. Freshlield whether it would not be advisable to lay before the public an account of the particulars of the expenditure of the money subscribed ? This he thought would be necessary at all events, if it were the intention of the Committee to make an appeal to the public in behalf of the refugees. Mr. FRESHFIELD said the account alluded ta, which would prove extremely satisfactory, should, of course, at once be laid before the public, upon whose humanity there was to be placed the greatest reliance in the event of another application. He be. lined that the funds wee now sufficient to bear those who were at present on the hooks through the winter; but if the number were to { name t h ere appeared to be ma other course than that of public contribution. He had seen one of the principal persons connected with the Committee fry the relief of the houseless poor, and been informed by him that he was anxious to make that Society an in stitution of a permanent nature. The LORD 31 Avon mid he was decidedly of opinion that a per. manent institution of this nature would be attended with vast incon. veniences, which would counterbalance all the good that might be done. It would be an encouragement to all the idlers and poor of all descriptions in thecountry to wine up to London instead of remaining in their own parishes. Some of those inconveniences were felt when the contributions were first raised, and he hoped that so impolitic a measure would not be adopted. - . _ Mr. Fazsurrei.o as,ured his Lordship that the cases of the refugees should be attended to and relieved with the customary punctuaity. A general meeting will, we understand, be soon called, when the sulject will undergo discussion. GUILDHALL. Belton Watkins • Afachin wu mimed with obtaining, under false pretences, two pieces of grog de Naples, from Messrs. Ames and Atkinson, silk-manufacturers, Paternoster-rcw. . . The prisoner, it appeared, °Mud to pledge at Mr. Tlarker's, pawnbroker, in High Holborn, on Saturday morning last, about 22 yards of silk, requiring the loan of `2s. SI per yard. The slop. man Immediately recollected that he was the slime party that had pledged a piste of silk a abort Artie before, which had beet, subse. quently claimed, and, by order of the Itlaeiatrates at Bow.street, delivered over to the owner. 11e reminded the prisoner of the cir. conietence, when he stated that he had brought that piece for a Mend belonging to a respectable firm in I'leet-street ; but, upon being told that the property had been claimed, and that it would be desirable that he should be confronted with the claimant, he be. tame agitated, and struggled to escape into the street, but this was presented, and.he wss secured by two of the Bow-street Patrol. To the officers the itrk.onet confessed that he had formerly lived with Messrs. Hogged and Amber. linen-drapers, Waterloo.place, and that the silk had been obtaitieti from Illeurs. Ames and At. kinsoit's. :13MIDel Treseher, warehouseman at Messm Ames's, Mated that on the 7th of November the prisoner &mein and inquired fot a levantine to match a patterishe exhibited. Having none of that description, the prisoner next asked to look at two French grie' de Naples; of diffitrent pricey, and haying selected one piece of yards at 6s. 7d. per yard, aid soothes of 6U yards at Cs. W. deairtd BOW-STREET. Clarks Pike, a wagoner in the employ of Mr. Smith. a coal merchant at Mot ...bridge. was yesterday brought up on a sum mons, to answer the complaint of James Clyne, the proprietor of the Hammersmith van, which carries passengers, and is drawn by one horse. It appeared from the statement of Edward Field, the driver of the van, that as lie was coming into London on Monday afternoon, he overtook, in Ilemming's-row, a coal wagon, which Pike was driving, He endeavoured to pass him, for which there was plenty of room, when the defendant seized his horse by the reins, and not only forced him back, so that the steps of the van were broken, and its fore-wheel locked in the hind-wheel of the wagon, but, on his remonstrating, employed his disengaged hand in striking wit ness repeatedly with his whip aemss the face and body ; nor did his misconduct end here, for, without loosing the horse he bad seized, he violently whipped on his own, and the complete subver sion of the Hammersmith van, with all its passengers. &c. was the necessary and immediate consequence. Having effected all this mischief; without stooping to ascertain the extent of the damage he had done, or concerning himself at all whether he had killed any body or not, he drove very coolly on. his partner, who had encouraged him throughout, making off with rather more preci pitation. Sir RICHARD Ilrnvte, who was the presiding Magistrate, questioned Field very closely as to there being room for the vehicle to pass, which he declared was the case, and in this he was con firmed by a gentleman of the name of Lewis, a passenger in the van, who witnessed the whole transaction through the front window, and who bore strong testimony to the character of Field as a skilful coachman, both on this and on several other occasions. Mr. Lewis added, that his (Field's) conduct throughout the transae lion was in no way blameable, the accident arising from the im proper and wanton conduct of the defendant Pike. Mr. Lewis', forehead exhibited marks of severe injury, and he stated that two other passengers were yet more seriously hurt than himself, so much so indeed, that they were unable to attend and give their evi dence, one especially being still confined to his bed by the bruises he had received. Pike, in his defence, denied that there was room for the van to pass his wagon, for a cart was in the way, which tendered it impos sible so to do without injury to his horses ; he therefore. he admit ted, did back the complainant's horse ; but said the overturn was entirely his own fault. . . _ . This statevent was, however, completely negatived by the evi dence for the .complainant; and the worthy Magistrate, after commenting in strong terms on the brutal conduct of the wa goner, regretted, he said, exceedingly, that by the Act his hands were tied from doing more than fining him 10s., which, together with the costs, he ordered him to pay immediately ; strongly re commending the driver to prosecute him in another Court for the amount of damage done to the horse and vehicle, which is consi derable. l field intimated that he had no doubt but that his employer would follow his Worship's advice. Pike grumbled a good deal at this decision, but the Magia. trate was firm , and evict he was only sorry he could not increase the penalty to 51., which he certainly would have done, under the circumstances of the case, had the law permitted it. Since the decision given last week by the Magistrates at this office against the market-gardeners frequenting Covent-garden, the nuisance of which the inhabitants have so much lemon to complain has somewhat abated, but not altogether ceased, nor can it until some measures are taken to restore the market to its original state, and to prevent any put of it from being devoted to a ny b u t t h e purposes for which It was established. This can only be done by removing at least one.halt of the shops that encumber the square within the denter.stone. We understand that measures are in con templation to compel the lessees to do this. Yesterday two persons appeared upon summons, to answer for having placed their carts in the public street, and kept them there a longer time than wan necessary for loading or unloading. Mr. Roche, the vestry clerk, and Mr. Cribb, one of the Com missioners of Pavement, attended for the prosecution, and those gentlemen both expressed their full determioation to persist in these measures until the nuisance was stopped. The first case was that of a man named Parsons, anti it appeared from the statement of Mr. Stevens, the Surveyor of Pavements, that on Saturday morning last the defendant's cart was seen, at a little beforeeseven o'clock, standing within the dente-atone, and of course no notice was taken of it. In n short time after, however, it was found standing on the public pavement, and the defendant received notice that he must remove it, or he mould be summoned. He said that it was not his fault that it was there, for that he had placed it within the stone, from whence it was forcibly removed by a Mr. Dancer, another market-gardener, who claimed aright to the spot where defendant's cart stood, telling him that he paid an an nual rent to the lessees for leave to put his cart there. Mr. Stevens told him it was certainly a hard case, but he must no: let his cart stand in the street. The defendant, however, neglected this warn ing, and his cart remained there until past eight, when it was taken to the Green-yard (it did not appear by whom); and Mr. Stevens found a gentleman on the spot, who had witnessed the i taking it sway, pro very loudly against the act, as one o f gross n justice and oppression, and declaring that he would pay the ex penses that might be incurred by the poor man. Parsons, in his defence, complained greatly of the hardship of the case, and said that Mr. Dancer, and not he, was the offender. Having seen an account in the newspapers of what passed here last week, he was particularly careful to be at market in good time, and to place his cart inside the denter-stone, for he was a very poor man, and not able to pay penalties. Ile asked the porters of the market if he had a right to stand on Abe spot which he had chosen ? and they said he had, the rule of the place being " first cease first served." Mr. Darter, however, claimed the ground for his cart, a.‘d not only forcibly rem ove d defendant's cart, but assaulted hhn into the bargain. 1 Sir R. Hamm said it certainly was a very hard case, but he should have removed his cart when told to do so by the proper officer. He (Sir It. Birnie) thought the deffindant would certainly have his remedy against Mr. Dancer for whatever penalty and costs he might have to pay. Indeed it was almost a matter of doubt whether he would not be liable, under the Act of Parliament, in stead of the defendant, he having '• placed" the cart in the street. Mr. Roche said it was thought best to proceed against the de fendant, who was certainly liable, the words of the Act being " niece, cause, or suffer to be placed." Ile would Le left to his remedy, If he had any. against Dancer. The defendant was fined des. and es. costs. Ile said he was so poor as to be quite unable to pay the line. He was toad that four. teen days would be allowed lima to pay it, and unless it was forth coming in that time a warrant of distress would issue. The second case was then gone into, and the offence being proved, the defendant in answer said, that he only placed his cart in the street to load, and he could not place it within the denter stone„because there was not room. Sir H. Marius—And did you pay the toll ? Defendant—Oh ! yes, Sir ; they always take cure of that. Sir H. BIUVIE—Upon my word it is too bad. These lessees are the primary cause of all these offences. The defendant was fined in the lowest penalty-40s and costs. Dee HALLS told the defendants that there was an appeal to the Sessions /knoll ed by the Act if they chose to avail thetnaelt cs of it; but they said they had no money to go to law whit. WORSHIP -STREET. Clarks Iloldnrorth was again brought up yesterday, and underwent a lengthened examination on several additional c►uwges. Mr. Twyr nub, the sitting Alagistrate, after the depositions were read, by which six different cases of swindling were substan tiated, directed that the prhoner should be remeaded, and brought =2lmtt up daily for re-examination until all the cases should b e fo r established. The prisoner looked more dejected than on the preceling aminations; he was extremely pale and wan, and his eye ; veers v much inflamed and swollen. e.y It seems, according to the evidence prod uce d t hi s day, thee eta prisoner has occupied lorlgihes in all parts of the town, hut revsremained in them above three or font night s , hi s plan ben t to the," the goods he had art, cted to be sent to hie lodgings on the day s f his departure, when lie used to decamp with them on his p uken. and proceed to some retreat which has not yet been discovered. The final depository was, in every instance, a pawnbroker' s ie . unity and in the event of questions being asked, he was always prepared with a stamped receipt for the article, under the feigt e d signature of the duped tradesman from whom lie obtsined it. The attention of the Magistrate at this office has been occ ep k d for three weeks past, on a charge of burglary, and three prisee dee : whose names are el. Robinson, W. Pal6ury. and J. have undergone several examinations, charged with robbing jir r: 11 - alters, of Spitaltields, of silk trithe a m ount o f V, The prosecutor having failed in the proof cf the case of burglary, instituted a charge of embezzlement against his journeyman„lemes Longuett, to whom the work WAS in the first instance delirengt out to be handed over to the prisoners. This case shared the sante fate as the former, and was discharge d. These charges have ly en no less than nine times adjourned. T. A AI lirTif-STR EFT. FALLEN FOTlTVNES.—Yesterday a wretched-looking being , without as coveted his was brought up on a charge of stealing, pint pot belonging to Mr. dleeke, the landlord of the Angel Dub. lic-house, West Ham, Essex. The prisoner appeared to be ,host 28 years of age. It appeared by the evidence of a patrol named Norris that be stopped the prisoner in the Globe-fields, and on searching blot found the pot in his coat pocket. The prisoner said he had pick e d it up iii a brick-field, which answer not being very oxisfactery, be was taken into custody. Norris had made inquiry at the pubes house, but no one there recollected seeing the prisoner. Sir D. WILLIAMS, the sitting Illwistrate, laving interrego* the prisoner, he stated that hi s n o ne was J ames Culquldorn, poi that he was a native of Scotland. He had ori g i ra ll y b een attar to the Commissariat department, an d i n that service had ham la. ployed during the Peninsular campaigns: since the peace bend filled several trustworthy situations in different mercantile b utt in the metropolis ; the last was that of collecting clerk in a tailoria; establishment in Bond -street, but which, about 18 niontha slay * , he had left, and endeavoured to procure another, but was awe. (mild. To support nature, he was obliged to pawn his clo:h a y and after the small sum he could foist on those wa s e x p eo d ed,h ; went into the Docks, where he worked as a day labourer, which occupation, in consequence of a naturally delicate constitutita, he was obliged to discontinue. The wretched man coneluced by say. ing, that in fact his destitution was so extreme, that for the loot three weeks he had not laid his ride on a bed, and that it was only since he was sent to Clerkenwell prison that be had enjoyed that comfort. _ _ Sir D. Wtt.ktesss—Where then used you to Aleep? Prisoner--Sometimes in the open air, sometimes underneath a esrt, and oftentimes near the brick-kilns. Sir D. WILLIAZIS-Why did you steal this pot ? Prisoner—l did not steal it ; I saw it lying in a field nears public-house, and being at the time pinched with hnngtr, I took it with the intention of selling it, and buying some food. Sir D. AWlLLiams—Why not acquaint your friend' with your condition ? Prisoner—l have many respectabl e friends, your IV°tibia ; b at I preferred undergoing many privations to informing them of my misery. Sir D. irti. Li ms then said that there being no proof of the felony, and it being probable that the pot might have bent picked up in the manner described by the prisoner, he would Dow discharge him. The prisoner was accordingly discharged, and directions given that he should be transmitted to the overseers of 31ile.end Old, town, to whom a recommendation was forwarded, to have hint taken care of and sent to his own country and friends. Before his leaving the bar the worthy Magistrate contributed to the removal of his more immediate wants from his private purse. -r~ w that they might be entered snd got ready while he went on a little farther to obtain the Immune. In a very few minutes he returned and fetched away the goods. The prisoner did not use the name of Hogard and Amber, hut knowing him to have been in their employ a long while. they took it for granted that he then came from them. The bill of parcels was slipped partly within the otitside wrapper, but the part that wu exposed bore the name of Hogard and Amber, as the purchasers, and being pinned on the goods, the prisoner cnuld net avoid seeing it. Mr. Hogard caul the prisoner was in their employ some months, but he had been discharged nearly half a year ago, and they bad never ordered or received the silk in question. Mr. Robinson, of the firm of Wilson and Co. of Milk -street, stated that the prisoner Caine to their house about the 7th of No vember. produced the pattern of levantine, was suited with a piece to match, and saying he came from Messrs. Hogard and Amber, wished to carry it with him. Mr. R. nut being acquainted with his person, hesitated, and understanding that he was going to Messrs. Ames's for goods, said he would send the levantine there, and if they knew him, lie (Mr. II.) would be content. Thefprisoner then, assuming the appearance of indignation, said, " No, Sir, if you do not choose to trust me with the goods, it is of no conse quence : never mind." Mr. Ames produced a roller on which the silk had been wound, with-the Fames tiff is: 1'22 writing, to denote the number of yards. This had been found at the prisoner's iss4l:l4, He believed the piece the prisoner had offered to pawn at 2s. dd. a yarii .44=0 same that had been charged 6s. 6d. The prisoner offered no defence. Mr. Beresford, the clerk, submitted that, as the prisoner had not stated expressly that lie came front or fur Messrs. Hogard, he hail not committed an offence within the reach of the sta tute, which required some " false pretence" to be used. Sir JAMES SHAW, notwithstanding this opinion, said he could not allow the prisoner to escape, while so complete an impression that he had defrauded, or intended to defraud, Mr. Ames of 40t. worth of silk. remained upon mind. The prisoner knew it would be supposed lie Came from Messrs. Bogard's ; he did not ask for credit to himself ; nor could he have expected it to be granted in the loose way the transaction took place. Indeed, he must have seen, in all probability, the bill of parcels pinned r safely to goods made out in the name of his former etnplcyers, and ' it would be too much for him (the Alderman) to decide that he ought not, or could not, he punished. He would leave those questions for a Jury and the Court. The prisoner was then committed. Sir JAMES SHAW stated, that on returning home on Wednesday evening he found a letter on his table, signed " G. B. ' "enclosing two sovereigns, with •reepiest that it should be applied to the use of the unfortunate young girl, Sarah Fielding, who attempted to throw herself into the Thames from the Southwark-bridge. On behalf of this girl an application had been made to Mrs. Fry, as one of the prireipal managers of the Guardian charity, and she had been kindly taken in, to be provided for until something can he done for her. Sarah Manning, the girl who attempted to stab herself in the Court of Requests, had also been received into the same benevolent institution. The Commissioners of the Court had now decided, that the young man who had caused all her affliction was still indebted to her U. 10s., and that he should repay it at IL per month, and her mind had in consequence become more tranquil. THE COMBINATIONS IN SCOTLAND. An agent in Stevenston prosecuted two weavers before the Justices, in Irvine, for desertion of their work. It ap peared that these misled individuals, having engaged work from the agent, had been tampered with by the leaders of the association in that quarter, so as to induce them to break their bargain and return the webs, under thepretence of the yarn not exactly agreeing with their notions of ma nufacture. The agent, Mr. Gilmour, stated that this sys tem of engaging webs, and returning them or retaining them under the directions of the committee,had been lately carried to a great extent, to the great injury of the indi- viduals whom the committee had chosen to select for that purpose. The webs arc regularly engaged by the weavers —they are then taken to the committee and weighed, to decide whether the Nos. of yarn square with their tables. The calculations necessary for ascertaining this are fre quently made by persons who are generally ignorant of the props* mode of making such calculations. 'Should the agent or manufacturer from whom the weaver draws his web happen to be obnoxious to the reigning members of the committee, then the work is ordered to be returned, and the deluded victims of this system have no alternative but obey the mandate ; the committee, in sr • usually allow a small sum to the weaver from t 1 The Justices of the Peace, after expressing their tion of the measures taken by the agent, severe) mended the weavers, and signified that their • would in every case be afforded to those indiv, suffered from such injurious confiuct. The wet allowed two days to return to their labour, or do so, to be incarcerated for three months in ' gaol. The prompt manner in which Mr. Houston ex combined colliers from his works, and replaced tl dustrious labourers, has not only raised that beep with high in public estimati o n, but has bee with all the advantages expected. The new Quarrelton colliery are making rapid progress h profession; and the combined colliers are in sui that they lately attempted to set one of the • They continue to loiter about in idleness, se such support as the combined in that quarter them. Nothing but unconditional submission expected to give any of them a chance of b, back by their former employer. Some trifling are said to have happened between the fami peaceful workmen and the combined. The pi of preventing a recurrence of such, is to prohibh course between them.—Glastrow Chronicle. BIRTHS. At Great Yarmouth, on the =7th ult. the lady of /1. Barclay, R. N. of a daughter. Yesterday, in lippa Bedford-place, Russell-squan Nathaniel Ellison, Esq. of a daughter, still-born. MARRIED. On the 30th ult. at St. Paul, Covent garden, Capt. V foot, of P.oreham, Essex. to Mrs. Hinde, of the same, At Brighton, on the 29th ult. Edward Parry, Esq. East India Company's Civil Service, to Catherine II Oaughter of Edward Isaac, Esq. formerly of Brook I onumty of Southampton. DIED. On the 29th ult. Mrs. Lodingtoo, relict of the Rev. ton, late Vicar of Oundle, Northamptonshhe, aged 70. On the 29th ult. at his house, in Pentonrille, in the his age, Mr. Watkinson, father of the Rey. R. W the Charter-house. On Tuesday, the 224 of November, after a short ham, in the county of Norfolk, Ann Townly, aged a wards of twenty years governess in the family of H. V of Marham House. On Wednesday, at his brother's house in Upper street, Edward Calvert, Esq. FISTULA. KNOWING the very great prevalence of this Complaint in all ranks of society, but more amongst the Working Classes, and convinced that it ale tent, and. in numerous cases where an efficient term promptly applied . speedily terminates the existence of nate sufferer, the Friendly Benefit Society called " hOtl at Mr. Davis's, the sign of the Dolphin, C liethnal•green, London, has been induced to give pu following care (which can be well attested) of one of i who has been cured by Mr. VAN BUTCH ELL. lam South-street, Grosvenor-square, London, but now rem Oxford -street, nearly opposite to Bond-street, in or persons sa afflicted may know to whom to apply for a and permanent cure:— " Thomas Wood, of No. ti, Hare-marsh, St. J. Bethnal-green, having been afflicted with Fistula for f and during the whole of that period in a state of cool and being unable to obtain a cure from the exertions of Surg,aon, and two others professing an ability to con plaint, was fortunately recommended to place Inn hands of Mr. Van Butchell, by whom, after only ATTENDANCES, he was radically cured, without diet or confinement, and is now as well as ever he was (Witness) " lIENRY S' " Clerk to the. Friendly Society called " No. M., St. John-street, Bethnal-green." HUM WATER IT - 1.6N/501 , 1BRIIXIE TR, Morning, 22 min. after 1 I Evening, 48 min. Printed et TETE BRITISH PRESS Olio, by J. W 181, Strand, and published by R. Cantos,, some 1 to Pe the committee, in such mess WI; to the weaver from their funds. Gra e, a fter a f b the ter y e3c agent, ess iu g tseheiverrealpy repTiproba• : o ti t iii r a t id signi fi ed that their protection t ag e : 'fronted to those individuals who or MI ious confluct. The weavers were the I urn to their labour, or fsiling to 'der I for three months in the county "Sul must which Mr. Houston expelled the espre works, and replaced them by to- the th not only raised that gentleman's „, 1 "tal stimation, but has been attended 7 rd : expected. The new workmen at FOI iking rapid progress in their new toed, tined colliers are in such despair, t he rd to act one of the pits on fire. Iloti about in idleness, subsisting on Drs shined in that quarter can afford N.I mlitional Fll bmission can row be rd tl them a chance of being taken Ime s lover. SCllle trifling differences I red between the families of the lie combined. The proper mode (TY sl of such, is to prohibit all inter. .' iestoto Cht onicle. IRTHS. 27th ult. the lady of Captain Robert der. rd-place, Russell-square, the mid of T id aughter, still-born. i c h s , kRRIED. Covent-garden, Capt. W. H. Hoe. rs. Hinde, of the same place. lt. Edward Parry, Esq of the Hoe. NI service, to Catherine Harriet. riots( sq. formerly of Brook Huth. is tM 11t an DIED. ngtoo, relict of the Rev. Jos. Lodi* St rthamptonsbite, aged 70. Ms le, in Pentonville, in the 85th year sf Tt thew of the Rev. R. ll'atkiLsoo, d is vember, after a short illness. at ,Mr• lls k, Ann Townly, aged shout $O. 5 311141 is in the family of H. Eq• s rother's house in Upper Witnpot •p STULIE. 1 ,s of p eoc re i v et a y le , n b co ut of ro th ore isf p o tri rm im id is ab rl cs 'toto , and convinced that it always row. Fo r s where an efficient remedy is nK u 4 tributes the existence of the u nfort . soil else& Society called ,• Th e Units." go of the Dolphin, Church-o'er• seen induced to give publicity to du well attested)) of one of its Members. 'AN BUTCH Lb, late of No. 4 e, London, but now removed to e to Bond-street, in order that ad to whom to apply foe a sate, sPo d !' s 5, Hare-marsh, St. Jolla - same , Dieted with Fistula fur fifteen year , period in a state of continued re'. Tich et ore from the exertions of as o nineot oat (suing an ability to cure that ( t, mended to place himself in . th e July by whom, after only TSI'VsTI _ AT adtnsay i r ir ie adu nd icw l a y elll Soe ly‘ac'sull ie rvred t i ; :eN; ca r; il lt ed h;CaPt l in ' ir be eeillfC l ';inntioets.:3' aabl htbolg—litatiON THIS liA t !. Idea, !fief erj or - - POU o 'll b E;;S ß Ofl: cA ce sx . boyxJ:gslinle. CpAisaiti.ro%.