The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1821-02-20 00:00:00

11 ' • t . :'. • . • . rte` . • -4 , 4 1 V 1- . 4 • 4 = A f .• t•• - . • 1. • 1111111111111.111.111 7 111111111-4"--- 4 w • • ... 7 0 O lt . ,• 4 I t r • . rt -• •• tit L'47", Numuza 5682. TH RA TRR-ROYA DRURY-LA NH. TiilS EVENING, TUESDAY. Febru ivy 20, his Majesty's !Servants will perform the Opera of A RTAXERX ES. Arts: , Madame Vestris; Artmeice, Mr. Braham; Ar- Wows, Mr. Hors ; Rimenes, Mr. Dolihs. Minotaur, Miss WiNusi (her 16111 •ppearance in public i; Seining, Miss Pueey. Mr. T. Welsh will preside at the Piano-forte during the period of Miss Wilsoo's yes forename. After which, 131 h time, a Drama, in three sets, now perform ing on the Continent with the most extraordinary OUCCeII, entitled THERF.SE, THE ORPHAN OF GENEVA. (2.1 time), Mr. Cooper; Funtaitie (2.1 time), 61r. Pope; Count ile Morville. Mr. B.iiiiiard ; Picard, Mr. (attic; La•ifilf, Mr. Knight ; Delpare, Mr. Brumley. M riette, Miss Kelly; the Countess dc Mocoille, Mrs. kgertou ; Bridget, Mr. Ilarlour. The.new Meto.drams will be performed every evening fill Further soma, toimorrow excepted. _ 7'p sMrrow will be produced a new Tragedy, tidied Conacieser, or The Bridal Night—with Giovanni i• [Amadeu. Oa Thuralay, Arts:erica Mandane, Miss Wilson. The Comic Opera of Love in a Viiine is in rehearsal. NEVER ACTED. TI IPA TRR-IROYA L, COVHNT-GARDEN. THIS EVENING, TUESDAY, February 20, will be produced a new Operatic Drains, called DON JOHN ; Or, THE TWO VIOLETTAS. Dos John, Mr. C. Kemble; Dun Frederick, Mr. Jones ; Mkt of 'Ferraris, Mr. Duruset ; Petrurhiu, Mr. Conu"r ; Fraciioso, Mr. Liston. First Violetla, Miss Hallande (her first appearance on say stage) ; Landlady, Mrs. Davenport; ficcood V iuletta, Miss Stephens. Mier which the Fares of RAISING THE WIND. Jeremy Diddlcr, Mr. Jones ; Plainway, Mr. Blanchard ; Tsitiwou'd, Mr. Yates; Sam, Mr. Emery. !Aurelia Dura ble, Mrs. Davenport; Peggy, Miss Love. On Thursday will he produced a new Serious Drama, in which Mrs. Viiiing will make bee first appearance at this 3CItIPTIONS am, AN NIV WARY DINNER, of February, 1821: His Royal Highness g. a. The Doke ol York, (Presideol) 52 10 Tba Earl of Liverpool (Y. P.) L or d VOL Sidosoutb (Y. P.) 3l 10 I.4.Carriugroo (Y.P ) 10 0 W. Willies force, Esq. (Y. P) a 1 P....... 5 5 G. IVatson Taylor, Esq. b 1 P..... .... 20 0 bir. Aid. Rothwell.... 10 10 Mr. SloillT Willi•ars 10 10 N. M. Rotisschild,Erq. 21 0 Mrs. Waldo 2O 0 Thus. Diadem, Esq 5 0 C. Williamson, Esq 5 0 Mrs. Forster 5 5 Edward Funter, Esq (Treasurer) Mr.. Edward Forster Sir Juba Was. Lab- I)ESTI FU °NATIONS received at the on Thursday, the 15th day Edge. Irisnside, Esq 1 1 Jol:n Smith, Esq 1 1 J. Viderhusum, Esq 1 1 J. P. Aurucker, Esq 1 I E. Guuldsmilh, Esq 1 1 Thomas Fisher Esq 10 1 0 Cornelius Boyles, Esq. 1 1 Edward &tilts, Esq I I S. Busanquet, Esq. 5 5 Dr Gower 1 I .1. Turner Watts, Esq 2 • 2 Mr. Bourne H. Alexander, Esq 3 3 Mrs. Smith Mr.. Sterry Rev. Jur. Henderson I 1 Isaac Sally, Esq. Thus, Wright, F.rq. „ 111 10 Geuige Moore, Esq lO 0 W. T. Rubinson, Esq 5 0 T. F. Forster, Esq. E. Forster jun. Esq 1 I .-.--- klek, Barr. The Rev. Mr. Wisc 1 1 I James Soper, E.g..... 1 1 Iltr. John NuLtige , 2 2 A. AllCansland, Log. 1 1 Mrs. F. Dixon 3 3 Thos. Warre,jen. Esq. 1 1 Mrs. Cay J. A. Clarke, Esq 2 2 R. Colcsworth, Esq... 1. I J. W. Fresbaeld, Wm. hikes, Esq. .• • • 1 1 Esq. Win. %Via, Esq. J. 11. Bradshaw, Eill 5 U Thomas Brown, Esq, 1 1 Wm. Kent, E.g 2 2 A. Chapman, jun. Esq. 1 I Johts Yt'oullry. Esq., 1 1 . Capt. A. Chapman .. 2 2 The True Hiatus 1 John Leadim, Esq... 1 1 Newspaper Cliff Ash.oure, E.q .. 10 101 T Hewiersots, Esq 1 1 1.,c. J. litrtikari.. , .. 1 1 Th u mas D a lton, El. 2 2 J. 11. Cappc., 1.:•41 .. 2 2 Mr. R..bert Gill .. • • 1 1 John Teitaue, Esq... 1 1 , A Lady, by Mr. LAM 1 1 G. Palmer, E.g..... 5 S Ws. Julio Collin Mr. Wm. Duubar.. 1 1 1 Robert Briscoe,g. 1 1 s. Cohen , F,sq.. .••• 10 10 Thus Roberts, l' Erig A. A. Guisitild, Esq. 10 10 Robert Sullen, E.q 5 5 S Joseph, Esq ..... .. 3 3 I R. Suisun, juts. Esq , 2 2 D. Dimon, Esq.... 3 3 ! John Sulkies, Esq 1 1 .1. Cohen, Esq. .. 3 3 Rev. Edward Owen B. A. Guldschmidt, F. C. Warner, E•ty. El. J. L. Gokl•mitl, Esq 3 3 Messrs. Peacock arid .1. Joseph, E.q . 2 r... 2 1 1 Cu. A. Joseph, Esq 2 2 M in C ultrtt • B. Joseph, F a 1...... 2 I Thu.. Jsekson Esq. --lestiou Hart Esq... 2 t FS... 1644.4-le. - * .. f — r N. S• Siftgillaulk - Eag. Unison us Norris, Erg. I F Jsdah enhen, E*g .. 2 2 Jolla Flub, Earl 1 1 Lewis Aaruns, Esq... 2 2 Henry Clare, Fag l3 0 Israrl, Esq. ...... 2 2 R P. Gips's, Esq it Raphael, E.g..... 1 1 Capt. Rainier R.N.., 2' 2 Most MT as. 931• 9 1,..L 5i 1 1 John Morgan, Eaq .. 1 1 Ms J. . key M 11104, %att, E , .1 1 D no e l Rai n i er Esq. 1 1 J. Vanosen 4 4.„ , , . „,. 1 1 .1 .0. Hargis, RA.... 2 2 I ,' P 6111 4 1 % Else. • • 1 r 1 Robes t Harris, Esq. . . 2 2 'lP'neis Cohen, Esq. • ' 3 /Gels. Sanderson, Eq. 5 5 "'llll Coheir. Esq A, Calic o , Ear l ... 3 3. Ales. M . Cielly It. Checchi'', F.. 1 ... 111 E. s-e -—Uf if 110 E.g. .14n Dicks on , Esq... 1 1 J. M 11(rrrs, , k4 2 2 J. solidus', E.g. .. • • 3 3IJ. R. Moody. 1 1 Juh li P aw, E . g. .. • • 1 1 James Moody Subsetiplioas and Donations will he thankfully r crivill 4 1 141'r ....... , Edward Forster, Esq. N 0.6, St. Helen . .. PR.'. BISISPIISpIe j the Secretary, Nu. 36, Mottton.airtrere ; , it 114 Establirlancuts Hackies'-wad sad 11°114)"; by Mr. •!:Taitet, Collector , ' No. 2, Caslisl e •pl a r e , Lamest's'. ; by m r• hiss Haldsard, 90, Piccadilly ; by Mr. J. J. Slut kdale, . 1111 'isalli sad by the priLcipal Bankers in Town and smutty. ROBERT CROSBY, Stc. Thu day is putilishod, 1 bird Edition, price 61.1 , or five shillings per dozrn, AN AFFECTION ATE A 1)U12 E" to those DISSENTERS from the COMMUNION of the CHURCH of ENGLAND, who agree with her in the kali iug Doctrines of Clllll.iianity. By SAMUEL %YIN, A.M P R and A.S. Vicar of St. Bartholomew the less, Loudon. Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington, St. Paul's Church yard, sad Waterloo-place, Pall mall. 1 LONDON, TU ES DA' SURREY THEATRE. TH's EVENING , 1 UENDAY , Feh. go. and following F.veniogs, will be preseuted (6th lime) • grand historical Melo•dranistie Romance, called K EN I I-WORTII ; Or, THE COUNTESS OF LEICESTER. Robert Dndky, Earl of Leie..ster, Mr. Beugough ; Earl of Sussex, Mr. Grant ; Earl of Shiewsbury, Mr. Walker ; Cecil, Lord Burkigh, Mr. Ellis; Lord Hititsdosi, Mr. Ad curb; Sir Henry Lee, Mr. While; Walter Raleigh, Mr. Jackron; Richard Varney, Mr. Huntley; Nicholas Mono, Mr. Fitgwilliani ; Tressilian, Mr. S. H. Chapman. Q. , eel , Elix.hetb, Mrs. Dihdin; Duchess of Rutland, Mrs. Do mersel ; Countess of Leicester, Miss Taylor; Janet Fustcr, Miss Copeland. To conclude with (fur this Evening) the Romance of OSCAR. AND AIAININA. Osrur, Mr. Ridgway; Carrol (hi. Rival), Mr. Huntley.. Malvin.), Miss Taylor. T° 4o "" 0 " siN...4llentbrh-adtwe Heilituriirth, will hearted, Hoax; OD Friday and Saturday, Erary Body'. • -sole Bullet's it in forward preparation. Cousii;. A ars M Reprinting, with Additions, in Osie Volume , tiro. price in him di, T HE APOCRYPHAL NEW TESTA NI ENT. A New Edition. Printed for William Ihnir, 43. LedEste-hill, and sold by ell Booksellers lllr..ugl the K111(40111. Also, price 6d. n PROSPECTUS of the WORK, con taining for the Use of Inquirers, sod ,ld ditluue to complete Ilse Fiist Ed time. STAYS AND BELTS. RO3INSON and submit for In— dies' inspection their Fashionable Stays, COCMiS, and Children's Corsages, which they engage ill Et with superior taste. Potent Stays, to correct defective figures, re, tifY un even shoulders, preveol stooping, remove Tern brad curva tures, serration., in the bark, and spinal irregularities, and supper* +nil cure persons awry, rendering them straight and alanpely, without any pernicious steel, padding, or pressure. Elastic Anatomical lb-lts, which educe abilotnistal larcement, corpulence, local dropsy, umbilical hernia, and other accidents; relieve weakness mid relax Ilion, awl afFord berictici•l support after secoucherneut. Country Ladies instructed by letters to send iticanneen. Mark well the Homestead direct huts, as this advertisement is quoted, imitated, and totiblishiiscly copied verbatim, by incapable and unskilful rf.ollll. 7, I'olk-street, Covent-garden, London, IMPERIAL PA R LIAIAI A T. HOUSE OF LORDS, MONDAY, FEBRUARY IS. Tbeiillordships set St sine o'clock to ►ear Appeals. HiGuiss, zippellunt THE EARL OF ROSS, hell:mu/tent. This was an Appeal (runt the decision of the Court of Engin quer (Ireland). The Attorney-General aad Mr. Buller were henrd for the Appellant, Mr. Hart was beard fur the Respondent. Further argument postponed to Wediond.iy. Their Lordships, at a fete minutes hetuie four o'clock, ad jimmied during pleasure. The LORD CHANCELLOR, nt five o'clock, resumed his sent un the Woutsat k. Mr. Brogden, Mr. Stuart iVortley, and other Menshert of the House of COlOlllOllB. brought up four private Bills, which were severally read a first time. Mr. Fligham, from the Commissioners for the Reduction of the Natioued Debt, preseuted the Anuust Account fur tins year 1820. THE QUEEN. The Eorl of ROMAN presented a Petition from the Royal Burgh of Dysart, praying that he► Majesty's name 'night he reinstated 111 the Liturgy, and that she should be restored to her high bouroussaud dignities. Lord FOLEY pre-ented a similar Petition from Ilse Inhabitants of the town of Croydon, will, an additional prayer that 110 new measures might be lakeu agaiust her Majesty. The Noble Lord also presented a Petition from the Inhs bitaat■ of the lost, of Kidderminster, complaining of the comnirrcial distrc.s of the country, sad praying fur relief. They were in vereby read, and laid ow the table. HOLY ALLIANCE-NAPLES. Earl GREY said lie rime in pursusticeo r fhfuhritesner in notice of motion, ler the purpose of moving ro torso:mon as to what part this Government hail taken relative to the proceedings of the Congress of Sove rrignsat Troppm. It was necessary fur their Lord ships to be. put in poseessioit of further information, to enable them to have a correct knowledge of all the steps tarts by this , governinent relative to the l a t e events iis Naples. Whet hail lately passed in ttsat country amid sot fail ef exciting s livelf interest in the breint of every man, so the measores of the people to attain a con stnutien had excited the bewail of that dan gerous confederacy of Sovereigns. It was with this feeling, that, on the first day of the Session, he had mentioned the oubject to his Majesty's Mi. Moen, and put a questum to the Noble Earl op. posite (Liverpool), and his &Hower on she occasion appeared satisfactory, ss the Noble Earl diselsimeil ' s lat to interfere with the Gm/eminent of. any other country, and promised • document which Irma.' fully disclose the sentiments of his Mtliegt)'d Government on the subject. He hod moved fur inert document, and it was before their Lordships. It, however, did hot appear to him to be as sathsfactory as it was represented by the Noble Earl that it would be. winch induced Imo to make the present motion fur an humble Address to his Majesty, that lie would be graciously pleased to order further informstisin to be laid befire their Lord.hips oil the subject. Ile considered he was hound to rtu so after what had raised relative to Naples, and the language of the document issued Irons the Foreign Secretary's Office. feeble as it could out give satisfactory. He could 110 t heip fealu'lllitig uu the enormity of the principles in the circular of the Sovereigns, find printed at Hem burgh, which was. that the Congeries of Sovereigns had the right to snake • constant inquiry into the conduct of the govertimeists of other Sovereigns, and the changes made in them by the people—no matter with what unanimity the changes took place, FEBRUARY 20, 1821. no matter by what majority approved, uo, matter with what advantage to the people, and no matter whether it originated or was sanctioned by the if it interfered with despotism,they (the holy Alliance) had a right to declare war •g ‘inst the 'onion who :death' attempt to throw off the yoke of despotism. This way not the first time that those rwsitiMettle were promulgated under tlw sits. pice. of the Holy A Illative; for if they looked to the changes iii lie Governmeets of Spain and Por tugal, they would find at the time they occurred a Note of ()lance Mettereiclet, another of Ihr perm' of Russia to tlir same effect. and they cot firmed by au article in the Berlin Court Gazette; and When their Lordships considered the state of the press of that count they they coult, hare JI•1 doubt. of its smthenticitec It stated, that ev-ry form of government wit. repuenant to good order that did ten spring from, the Monercle or was the spontaneous act of the Soveieiesi. If this doctrine was true, it was saying, let the reign of tyranny proceed, and let the subjects orthe Monarchs of Europe beer their chains of slavery ; and it must be the ease, if subjects were lint allowed • yoke in their government. lie would ask, was the Note of Prince Metternich known to his Nbujesty's Government ? Was the Emperor of Russia's Note known to them ? If they were not, they must Pay they were kept in the dark until the last moment; for if they had knowledge of them, out. of two things must have happened : they must have remonstrated against them, or they did not ; If they did remonstrate, it must have bete in such field,- language that it Wart taken fir a tacit assent ; • but if they did not remonstrate, no colidernua min was too great for their conduct. On this point their Lordships had a right to demaud ex plameion from Majesty's Ministers. The Note had not been pulalislied mail the 19th of Jeriu try, about the period that Parliament was about to assesithie. The Noble Earl had assured the House that the Circular of the Austrian Govern ment had not been intended fir publication, but that having found its way to the public view, Mi nioters judged it neceas.ury to make their answer as conspicuous. But if tee principles of the Allied Court., continued in that Circolur, were objection able, it was the duty of Ministers to have opposed the d.claration of them at the inninent ; but coine ing out, as the paper of glue Foreign Secretary did, just before the meeting of Parliament, it looked more l.ke au attempt to obviate discussions stud explanations. which might ustuially have been ex pected as soon as die Parlieutent should be re. assembled. But how had %Miters displayed the r regard to the principle of nut interfering with the internal regulations of an independent State? What had been their coliduct in regard to such an interference by one of the Miele Pows • rs and how had they deittuted themselves to the people of Naples, who - Md'been - subjected to ties acknowledged injustice of interference ? Why, by a suspension of all amicable intercourse with the Niapblinsii Government. He saw that the Noble Lord differed with him upon that point. He re peated it, tit tit then an immediate einipension oil the part of the English Cabinet of ell tenietthle inter course between the Brutish and Neapolitan Courts had taken place, the functions of the British Minister at Naples were withdrawn, and the accredited Minister of the Government of Naples in Lnialoil was cut off from all commuilivii tion with this Government. Austria, meanwhile, assembles an army on the frontier of Naples; at the same time a British squadron, of extitioedinary force for • time of peace, enters the bay of Naples. Fur what purpose was thus equadron in writing ? To uphold the independent rights of Naples, or to assist the aggressive views of Austria ? Or was it to guard the embarkation of the King of Sicily, summoned, degradingly cited to appear before the meeting at Laybach, to answer for the in terual transactions of his kingdom ? Had his Britannic Majesty's Ministers in soy way concur red or undertaken to assist in that humiliation of the kingly office, that coarse outrage to the dignity of independent Sovereigns, which hail to match, which was without any parallel except in the invita tion, arrest, and forcible conveyance or Ferdiaatel of Spain to Bayonne, an instance of usurpiug violeece which none were louder than Ministers to deprecate, but from which they appeared to thilik that a profitable example might be derived ? These wer e considerations which, as they must occur to every honest mind engaged vim the *106..0, lie trusted would be met by 101 l and lethal:teeny ex planation. He came next to the consideration of the Note of the 19th J unitvry, when, chilled with the frosts, and encumbered with the fogs of winter, it came forth as an answer to the Austrian Circular. The Note appeared to advert to two distinct ob jects contained in the Circular—a declaration of the principle of interference, and • claim of assist once, founded on some league or treaty for assisting in that interference in the internal affairs of any state which might be *apposed to endanger the interest of any of the Powers so allied. To these the Note gave a general disclaimer of interference by the British Government in the internal regula tions of indepeudent Seers. S•ripped and dis charged from the confusion and verbiage in which it was enveloped, it amounted 19 nu more than such • declaration as he had described. His Lord ship then quoted parts of the paper, which declared that the conduct of the British Government with regard to Naples, would be regulated by the prin ciple* of national law and the rights of iticleiten derit States—that the British Government did not pretend to determine how far the interests of the Austrian Government might or might not render it necessary for them to interfere with the revolution of Naples—that the British Cloven) men notwithstend ing its indisposition to intertiie its the affiirs of Na ples, had not neglected to use the earliest opportu nity of expressing to the Neapolitun authorities their strongest censure of the mode and means by which the revolution had been effected. He wished to ask what right of interference or of judging be term tie rulers and people of other Wiwi', could be fairly assumed by lkituisters, accn..lurg to the principle first admitted ? Hut if that right Isad existed. their first duty would hare been to have secured full esplanatiou of all the particulars re garding the causes and Cummesseefurett of the it vs lution. Why were they au ready to censure that proceedinc before there could have been any thug like a sutlicicut lapse of Lime to gnu 1 th it isiforussi-- bon from the Allied Powers, as ..ell as to which their amity with foreign Stares cleattleten titled them. and which were so tstemoiel to the fortnatiois of a just judgment ow, and eels:tun. erne Neapolitan Revoluiiim 1 Here they wanted maenad-too, to prove the existence of that mia tiality iu determination which Ike ipterests of grtm JP, to tfaa l :ext passage in the paper, slier that in. which t probable right of Austria to interfere was admitted, in which it was asserted, s h ut iii I list twee the only security required by the Binds!' Gorcro mesa would be some security that the right of interference should not be perverted to the pur pose of territorial aggro iiel isemen Ile ittio4 say, that the conduct of Minister's in the whole of this proceeding appeared to be very extraor dinary. According to the principle which was first set forth, the least they could lisve done would have been to propose a censure on the con duct of the A flies, and to declare with firmness against any interference, without due explanation having been first given, with the internal affairs of Naples, instead of putting an end to ill amicable intercourse with Naples in the hest instance. %That were the grounds on which they [Hoke off their amity with Naples ? What prete:.ce could be offered for such a measure? There were accredited agents of the respective Sovereigns employed at the separate Coats. The King of Naples was oil his throne; his right of sovereignty fully ad milted; some changes were deemed necessary; his authority, which before was arbitrary, was now to be limited, amid tree principles were to supersede the unlimited power and despotism which before prevailed. 'file only plea for the necessity of interference, or for the Cenbllre adverted to in the Note of the Foreign Secretary, must lie sougsit for in the character of the revolution. Should he be told that because a change of policy avid legic- Moan had been comme,ced by the military, though subs elatedly adopted by the people without a di— setoient voice, and fluidly had (wen sanctioned and med by the Sotereiget, it was, therefore, ill adfinsoble in its principle, and all it. proceeding. ? But what if the case were otherwise ? Suppose a Monvich to succeed, by :he help of au Willy, in reducing the constitunon and laws of a free State, ought not the principle, if correct, of objection to revolutions commenced by the military, equally to stptrty 1 Yet what had been the conducted (*holsters with resitectaio Spainundeicircuaisiaisees similar to the-ater; A free Government, essablisliedsrsth for coucurrence not only of the people of that country, but with that -el England also, had been overturned by the army of the Kiiig; yet LIU suspension of ami cable relations had taken place—slot the slightest remonstrance or censure had passed from the Bd. fish Government on the ocean in, mares it were to be maintained that there was one rule fur arbitrary Governments contending against free Constitutions, and another rule for the people contending against the unlimited and itnplacable authority of arbi trary Gorernments, under the same or similar circumstances in other respects, it would he difficult to defend the obvious partiality of Ministers iu the application of their measures to the two in k:owes which he had mentioned. It must be the character of freedom in tile revolution of Naples which had attracted the resentment and centime under which that people labouren, stsd had in duced Ministers to take those hostile liens against them. lit this very case of Sicily, the bee rotten lotion which had been elllahllbilt(i there under the influence and plowed tttt of Great Britain, bud been overturned by the Sicilian Court, and 110 hos tile iuterference ou the part of the British Govern ment had occurred. These proceedings, togethe r with those of Laybsch,. the suspension of amicable intercourse with Naples, and the censure at th e changes in that Government passed upon them, without waiting fur explanation, Irel his Loidship to an inferetice of the mustiness emit pas tiality with which Ministers had prejudged the latter case. lie called their Lordships' &dewiest* to the strong ex emplification of the effect* of the conduct oh Go vernment, especially as it regarded the department of the Foreign Secretary. There were securities asked front the Austriati Goveriiment against the right of intertercuee lug used against Naples, for purposes of territorial aggrandisement. Herr was a proof of die effect of at:erupting to re gulate the balance of poser by terdiortal di. vision, instead of establishing it on the basis of stational right mid indepeedeocc. This was • very clear exemplification of the nature and tendency of that policy for which Genoa was sacrificed to Sardinia, Venice to Austria, Saxony to Prussia, and Norway to Sweden. This was the natural result of substitutiog force and domination to settle the balance of power (the tiecessity for which he might be disposed to admit as a principle), instead of securing it on the wily true foundation of right and justice, the defence of the • weak against the strong. Ilavitig rejected right and jug= trace, they might now behold the comoqiiences of substituting force and expediency. Obey de clared generally against the right of interference ; then they admitted that with respect to A mtria interference with Naples might he a necessary ex ception. But then they required security against territorial aggrandizement. lit this lay all the de fence against the invasion of tuitional rights and the aggressions of foreign States. What was there be sides this undefiued request for the peace and veen rity of States ? Austria, ii, violation of justice and national right, would occupy Naples. What would be the probable consequence? He knew not what the spirit of liberty might be able to achieve in favour of the Nespolians, hut i the superior power of Au.:iria would be moot PRICE 7d. • • likely to overcome Naples. Having *liken polars soot, how amid she be lead to etrartems Neplee ? Would not the irriia'rd feelings of the 4.o.ipinoot ed population be likely to teed to outrages white, would only be terininetid by alseolute conqurst ? F.xposed to all the artaeka of an enraged and i•i jurell people, she would he Compelled to subjti ease. and gareillson Teeple% with Austrian !woes. At all events, Neptes *yule become a dependaiice of the Aus'rien Geveiemetit. The exauip'e must be productive of tie worst cosisequences. Astute( is asked for assurances as a security for not tiontrig her interference with Naples to the accoute of territorial acquisition. With his experience of the pear, he professed his ina b ility to trust kernels to The salrltuCes of Au•ttnk oil such a auhivet. Could nil one believe that Austlie had given up all her former desigin ;yea Italy ? or, that having got bold of the terve% trey mild rrsotitellis'of Naples, she was all at once disposed to throw tip her former ambitious Pee jects ? Hut this being incredible, what sight net be the projects of ether Power* in referent-else or in consequence of the same trausactioe? They had seen in times of peace, sad a meeting of' Potentates professedly in friendship with each other, considerable jealousy and agitations An Enelisli elirrister. at the Cortgrees of *Vining, hail &teetered Russia as having a disposition to nolest the balance of power for purposes of leiri tolial requirement. Might not Russia be already pledged to assist Austria iu the invasion of Naples ? Had she not already shavis her disposition to en courege the interference of Austria with the affairs ' of Naples ? Would not other Powers as well as fe s e e sta lie disposed to demand a compensation to ' set off' this iiew advantage on the part of Austria ? Prussia and France Wight urge the neceseity ef compeasations. If so, a more singuirte view of the peaeeful and unambitious purposes of Austria thee lie cueld entertain must he taken by those who could imagine that the aggression of the Neapoli tan territory was not big- with the most fatal cones rptettets to the repose of Europe. After a reference to certain allegations contained in soene former trea ties, the paper cattail:v(l a declaration, which appear. ed to he the most explicit part of its compaelid. and which declaration purporeeti, that the papers re ferred to had never been understood as tending to impose c eiditieris on the British Government which disagreed with the nature of the Constitue tints ; and the 13thish Government disclaimed any comernetion cootraly thereto, which might be put . upon their agreements, in any appeal which Duet be rustle to their assiatance or interference. Here again was • strung exemplification of the soundness of thet system of union eneonz the Governments of Europe, which had, instead of justice sod good faith fur its foundation, the hare strength of confederated power. Treatise had beet, MA le to' numbers;•everf explanation had been sought and given by the' Pe tentatert one to member, so its to combine their views mid policy in the one ohj t of securing the peace and tranquillity of Euro ; conferences had been held, congresses had been called, treaties. manifestoes, protocols, documents of all soils hue been written and signed in abundance—yet, after all these curious and variegated ttents, after all the assiduous endeavours of our clear and explicit I Secretary of State for Foreign Aliens, explana tion and detail enough to fix the repose of Eurepe —after all that had passed at Aix-le-Cha pelle, at Paris, and then at Vienna, then again at Aix-la-Chapelle, at last it came to this, that in December 1820, it was found necessary to ex• pound by an official Note, the terms of relatiee andelliance conteined in the former treaties, the Al ' lied Powers declaring that they understood those terms in one sense, the British Minister declaring against the interpretation assumed, and setting up miother meaning. Were he to be called to elem. • pltfy by one circumstance the nature, tender:et?, eye effect of all the labour of negociations and treaties through which his Majesty's Ministers bud tra velled, and to chew at one simple view the advan tage, and propriety of their policy, he *oriel only have to point to the paper on the table. lie came at last to consider the case of exception, the probability of which was admitted by the paper. iii declaring &spent the general principle of inter ference with the lutenist arrengentents of Govern. merits. Ilecould trot help remarking on the extra. ordinary terangemeet of the subject in the paper befwe the House. The exception ought properly to have followed the general declaration of the right of indeeeuderit states to alter the regulations of their civil government. But the ;raper on the table first stated a disclaimer of the British Govern.. meet to the general. principle of interference ; secondly, a disclaimer of the explanation put upon the terms of certain treaties by the Al- lied Powers; thirdly. came the ca e of probable exception against the right of independent States as to interred alterations ; 4thly, the admission oil behalf of Austria th it Naples might be with re 'peen to the former Power a primer case of excep tion. So far, however, was the paper itself from yielding proof. of a dispaition nut to prejudge et treat any of the parties with partiality, that the re. verse was proved oat of the very declaration itself.. No objection was stated by the Foreign Secretary, even in supposition, to the interference of Austria. What COliCillelOil tern could be drawn btit that in asserting the general print iple with which the paper commenced, it hid been done without any ' view or intention to real application ? . To what . purpose was it to state useless end childish defiant-. testis, upon abstract principles, tit only fort he dials- sem of *cholas, which statements could be of no use:to menkind at large? But admitting the pis- * s .`‘ sibeetY otexception, and especially sole reference to the case ,of Napier, it would be admitted that . * the case ought to prove the strongest orerisety for interference. ' eette danger proposed sliduhl be real and not itnagiborys-sone that in calif. ef •the dread: . ' ed alterationevieng place, rendered the security of nagehouring States obviously hazardous_olie that threatened ennovatoun and overthrow to coettgentel Governments—auee as where inducements were . - p „ r ,, • ruwcr UI auz:ria %Quit! Ur moat "U":"IlDtH"..".”" as flt'Et 113UUCCUICUte Were A DELPHI THEATRE, STRAND. By Authority of the Right He.i. the Lor.l Chamberlain. rrHIS EVENING, TUESDAY, Feb. li will be presented, an entire new splendid Historical Melodramatic Widens, entitled, KENILWORTH CASTLE; OR, THE DAYS OF QUEEN BESS. Eal of Leicester, Mr. Watkins; Earl of Sussex, Mr. Jervis; Earl of Shrewsbury, Mr. Dennis; Lori Burleigh, Mr. Shaw ; Lord Southampton, Mr. A USIIII ; Walter Raleigh, Mr. Phillips; Sir Henry Lee, Mr. Brody; Treasilian, Mr. Waylett• Queen Elizabeth, Miss E. Scott; Amy, Countess • f Leicester, Mrs. Wayleit; Janet; Miss Yokes; Cicely, Miss Jerrold. To conclude with an entire new Comic Burleita, in two acts, entitled LODGINGS TO LET. Old Freshly, Mr. Buckingham,. Young Freshly, Mr. Cowin; Wilton, Mr. J. Jones; Solomon Sugarrtick, Mr. Walston. Miss Ellen Freshly, Mrs.Trunaut Mrs. Bom bay, Mrs. Daly; Nancy, Miss Vales. E FUG E for the DESTI l'U FE.—SU 13-