The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-05-24 00:00:00

At al whom the Electors of Westminster and the rocigfenno;k:nglaod would never forget. he alluded to Horne Tooke—(boud applause.) His words were, Vt. ). olairochr we abhor, bat Kingship we admit." Un- o m e illy the Constitution of England was no Monarchy. g o t wa s the principle of a Monarchy. ?-11n the lan. of the Poet it was that which Taught to realms undone The monstrous faith of many matte for one." Or b was not the principle of the English Constitution, pity less was it the principle of Christianity. The prin- ok .(Christianity was opposed to the pride of Moe secl Iby its hnmility and all its other characte •cs. '. • no great teacher of Christianity sacrificed himself for woa d of mankind, but when were monarchial doe- po , e ver known to inculcate the virtue of personal sa. g iacri far the benefit of the conmounity Nothing, ogee, appeared more absurd than to assimilate the , c i ec iple of monarchy to that of Christianity. and of the t u bs!' constitution. There was one subject which he o wl not omit to notice at this i .reat public meeting.— ge could not refrain from calling their attention to the c ool an individual now suffering under a sentence, * wit unjust which had ever been passed since the „ r id of the Revolution. lie should be ashamed if he 'ow e d any feeling of political hostility which might at gig time bare been expressed, to prevent him from en- Wonting to see justice done to a man suffering under p rone', and whose services to the public entitled to remneeratioa. Mr. Hunt, who was now confined 'Wiener gaol, was a signal instance of , the folly of * t rent Ministers, 'for was it possible that they sill bare contrived to raise that individual in the emi- t . ,ties of the public so effectual as those o Ilia they bad geed with a view of gratifying their malignity ? 11. tzd Mr. Hunt would still appeal to Parliament to be ' Marred at least for the penalties which had been so a sh , imposed upon him for doing what was actually ',telt to the public, and especially the agricultural p r o fit —he alluded so the sale of roasted grain as a hobbit powder. Upon all occasions, whether in their Moroi: or foreign policy, despotism was the ruling principle which influenced the conduct of the Govern- neat. 'the commercial interests of the country I n d bees sinriheed to this principle. Why had thermal:too attempt to cultivate a commercial inter- m i ts , aid South America? Why had they given so r emslagemeut to the Greeks now gloriously strag- gling for independence? Why in the gement* of Europe bad they overlooked unhappy Polauit, and why rasa unhappier Italy given to the hands of her op- r m.?? Nothing but the maintenance of despotism, at the monarchical principle, as it was termed, could Olio so absurd and mischievous a system of policy. till regard to the present state of agricultural distress, he believed the eyes of the country gentlemen would at WO be opened ' • and that finding as they did their ladies empty, while the Exchequer was full, they would elan begin to suspect what had become of their rents. 4.1 laugh.) But v.hether the country gentlemen mold be content to go without their rents, the Church net hitherto Aiwa itself so easily reconciled to the exiles of the principle of Chriatianity.—(A laugh.) lithe Church professing its affection for poverty to - an extent as the present system would reduce them should be so Lions and devout as to he content to he their tithes, provided they saved their religion— (Each laughter)—if the country gentlemen ware ready ekes their titles to their estates, and the clergy to do fair daty without taking any tithe, then there was no oriog how far such a system might proceed ; but this at least Certain, that the present system was as fatal their interests as to those of every other portion of community. The Ho ouet after some ether observations, which we ate that our limits went as from reporting, coeclnded by assuring the is,g of hie firm and unalterable attkhaseot to the 4.101 Pirlialllentalry Reform. NADEIMINGTON next rose for the purpose of pro- mga toast. His Lordship commenced by ohserving. Miter she able, eloquent, and impressive address of rierWorthy.ltepresentative, Sir F. Bartlett, who had flukes to the hearts and understandings of all present, rat awn most rise under a great disadvantage. He SO. regretted that the toast which he was about to "mow had not fallen to the lot of some other Gentle- raa more capable of doing justice to it than he was, es• tidally as he came there totally unprepared for the task, With the partiality of the stewards assigned to bins. l liedid hope that a Noble Friend of his (Lord John humill)a member of the illustrious House of Russell, li iiimmey name carried with it every thing that should their notice and confidence, would have tto discharge that task in a manner more of the subject. If, as the Hon. Gentleman (11r. 'had said, the longer they were acquainted with worthy rept esentative, Sir Francis Burdett, the e reason had they for approving of his conduct; and flubs end of fifteen years that expression was still op- liable to that distinguished individual, hemight claim a his friend, Mr. Itioblionse, a full share of confidence ° lathe manner in which he had acted up to the same rtr;oss.—(Applause.)--Front what he had teen of the 'o conduct of Mr. Hohhouse in Parliament, he could tat upon himself to say that there did not exist a more Waisted defender of the people's rights, or a more ikesapporter or the cause which they were assembled .celebrate. At the time when that Gentleman first sorted for Westminster, he was one of those who gave iia a very sincere opposition, and the present being be lint occasion upon which he bad addressed his belterelertors, lie thought he should avail himself it to acknowledge his error, with a promise tat it should be the last time be would coin- s inch a mistake.—(Applause.)--Indeed be hoped 1 1 sincerely that Westminster would never see 4 frinds of libeity divided upon any future occasion, dia! all the friends of the people would unite heart Wind in favour of those who had proved themselves etWecere advocates of their rights.—(Applatise.)— !kw 'tat hail been so ably stated on the subject of liar. . 4 ary Reform, he should only say a few words in ollscoi ne e of an opinion which had gone abroad, ntly. that P u bli c Meetings were of no avail on account Ilielutn: , nnerin ., which their Petitions were received by 4 tua at. 'I not opinion be was persuaded could have sostilht with the people of Westminster. for they betr4d w t e hat thou,r)i such Nleetings were not likely to be by ativ iumiediate effect, the good which they m 4t4o ld r o in i:!uia .c tily produce was quite incalculable. It was t the history of Parliamentary Reform. 7 , 47 l ing was now he l m without the introduction htert: and such being the case, the question "anion find its into the house of Commons it- If ho wanted a:is fact to Confirm him in this opi- an 'ingot refer to the late division on Lord John 4 sst mution, which was the geatest that hail err aro ploe since the time when Mr. Pitt, M . • aught forward the • • of R e form . as I h n o is pe te i r l, .""i'le, that nothing would discourage the people of 'Vaud from tot • g forward with Petitions, and that ,7 vaa ' sevi•re in bringing ten times f the Goose. He could not bet- t t:nclud e th an b y retnimlino• the meeting of a sea. costatard itsthe letter It• o Sir . Hnrdet t respect- j tntnna_ctit•os at Mancliestcr—" Let us unite to ,;'_, wrrood conduct the lo vers o f or d er , an d l e t its ..b reo . nr . enewies the a d van t age o f t r i um phi ng over 4 1 1n .I.,aret ir a inierl enthusiasm, or what is much worse, pathy and despair." 'I he Noble Lord mato cord I , u proposing as a toast, "The steadfast opposer • P' . If tl it:mongerieg oligarchy, and the able salvo- .'l'.° . P H i o a,r rights, their other worthy Representa- litjtlCoau bh""l4." nix, in returning thanks, said that since • THE STATES: . - first lie had the honour of a connexion with the people of Westminster, he looked for no other reward of bi humble exertions than the approval of his fellow-coun trymen, and he knew not in what assembly he could better put his success or failure in that respect to tl.. test than in the assembly which be had now the honour of addressing. It was Impossible for him not to feel embarrassed in addressing a meeting so enlightened upon such an occasion, and if any thing could add to his embarrassment it was the terms in which the Noble , Lord had been kind *slough to introduce him to their notice. The Noble Lord had expressed a hope that at no future time the friends of liberty would be divides! ; he hoped so too—(Applause)—not from any motives personal to himself, but in consideration of the import ant cause of Reform, which they had a common interest in maintaining. He had no other wish to go into Par liament than that which was so natural to every Eng- Hoboes, the wish to be in a situation to do good to his country; (Cheers)—in such a case he would g lead ly lead on • forlorn hope. If the Noble Lord, whose character en titled his opinions to so mach weight, felt himself justi fied in proposing( his health as he had done, and if they who bad received that toast with so much satisfaction, conceived that he was entitled to so high an honour, he had surely much reason to be proud, not of Isis own pretensions, but of their choice; if in Isis humble per son that union of the friends of liberty should take place, then indeed lie must be proud. and stimulated by that pride to the utmost efforts of which he was sopa. Me. It was on the people alone that he depen•led, who had proved themselves, In all ages, the hest jtulges and rewarders of public virtue. The Noble Lord had stated what might he done by the unanimity of the people of Westminster; bus theirexample had already shown what the people at large were capable of doing when the shackles of corruption were taken off. If she holy flames of liberty existed but in one corner of the coun try, it would be enough to keep hope alive. But that was happily not the case. Look were they would the same struggle was going on between the vices of the Government and the virtues of the people. The season why the Government was still so strong was, that the people still looked op to those above them with loomed) confidence. A sort of magical influence was attributed generally to our great and glorious Constitu tion, as it was called ; but it was strange shat while Dr Lolose and Blackstone, and man, foreigners represented us as the happiest people in the world, we did not seem to be aware of it ourselves. The situation in which we were with respect to this great and glorious Consti tution of ours reminded him of an expression used by the Lord Mayor of London at the time of the riots in 1780. Being asked by Lord North why lie did not call upon the pos:e eonsitatis? he answered, " I would have done so, but deuce take the fellow, I don't know where he lives."—(Laughter and applause.) In the same way Ise would wish to plate his dependence on the gift. rious Constitution, but he did not know where to find it. It was true that he had heard of the liberty of the Press as being like the air we breathe. and without which we die; bat the liberty of the Press, accompanied with Lord Sidmouth's Circular, was no great things, he 'nest own. Again, he had heard a great deal about Trial by Jury; but there was something called a Special Jury picked oat of the Guinea Men, as they were familiarly called--.Qaughter)--or out of the Pitt Club.—(Ap plause) The only thing that could now remind us of this invaluable right was the inscription upon Lord Erskine's coach, where it wonld continue as a reproach to as, if something was not done to restore and preserve its purity. Yet. with all this, we were told, in language re sembling that of the Poet. that we were " Too happy if if ear happiness we knew." Even that greet•lifie ask ptoperty p . that insurance office, that third err tate sad happy balance of the Constitution, our own dear darling Howse of Commons, was liable to Still greater abuses. And yet, Madame de Steel, soothe!, writer on the English Constitution, bad asked wills al` triumphant air, in 1815, whether it was possible that any person co uld believe au English Member of Parlia ment capable of receiving money for his vote? It hap pened very curiously, about this very time, that Lord Castlereagh was concerned in selling places in India tor votes in that House.—(Applause.) They had beard a great deal about the liberty of the Press, the glorielas Constitution, and other topics of the same kind; let it became them to chew that they were not pleased either with special Juries or with packed Parliaments. Ile might say of the Constitution what was said of Ilarle qusn's horse— Thus Harlequin extolled his horse, " Good in field, in road, and course : " One fault he had—a fault indeed— " And what was that? The horse was dead." The late vote in the House of Commons was sufficient to shew that Reform had made great progress ; hut what ever way the struggle might end, there could be no doubt bat it would redound to the honour of those who were engaged in it, and to the electors of Westminster, who had set the example to the rest of the kingdomo— (Applause.) The following toasts were then given with the usual honours:— "The Trial by Jury, unpicked and unpacked." " The Liberty of the Press." " The health of the Members for Middlesex." " Mr. Lambton and the Reformers of Durham." A letter was now read from Mr. Lambton, apologising for his absence, on the ground of a domestic calamity— tbe extreme indisposition and hourly expected death of a relative, we understand the Countess Grey. The next toast was, "Aldermen Wool: and Waith man, and the Reformers of the City of London." These Gentlemen severall♦ returned thanks. The next toast was—" Lord Nugent, Messrs. C. F. Palmer and Mouck, and the Reformers of Aylesbury and Reading." Lord NUMMI', in an eloquent !reel', contended for the necessity of complete Reform in conformity with the rising spirit and genius of the people. Parliament could not rob them of that right if they would, and ought not if they could.—(Applause.)—He would have them to elect no man, who did not pledge himself to Reform, by which means they would bare the triumph in their own hands in spite of corruption or alarm. Mr. Mowca also returned thanks. Ths next toast was—•" The Reformers of the Borough of Southwark, and their Gallant Representative, Sir R. Vinson." Sir It. IVILION congratulated the Meeting on the tri umph of their cause. It was now iu vain tc stigmatize them - as Jacobins and Revolutionists, when thousands of those who were the first to revile them concurred in the necessity of Reform. The CHAIRMAN in proposing " The health* of the Duke of Bedford, the Marquess of Tavistock, and Lord J. Russell," observed, that the name of the illustrious House of Russell was identified with the rights and li• berties of Englishmen. lie regretted that Lord J. Itus• sell had been prevented by intlisposition from attending at the present meeting. The CIIAIII3IAN then gave—" The Hon. G. Bennet, and the Reformers of Shrewsbury." Mr. B►atrec•r, in returning thanks, rap d hie conviction that the only sound acts which ever emanated from the House of Commons, were to be attributed to the operation of public opinion. The 16. Members who had recently voted for Parliamentary Reform, were pledged to carry their votes into effect, and he doubted sot of the ultimate success of the great CARS, iu which they were engaged. Th. CHAIRMA s , hen gave—" Loral Ebrington, and the Reformers of Devonshire." Lord Esittxnvo.:4 returned Oxalis. * - The Cu*lnman gave—" The Hon. C. Mitchinson, D. ltiesrdo, Esq. and the Reformers of Ireland." The Hon. C. 11111THINSON declared his warm and steadfast attachment to the cause of Parliamentary Re fortn.—(Applans...) U. IticaßDO,Fol. sail, that there was not in that room a more zealous friend to the cense of Reform than the indis ideal who then addressed them.— (Applausr.)--Ile meant not *sham, hut an effectual lieform, which would give the people a majority and more than a majority in the House of Commons. Such i Reform could, irs opinion, he effected only in the House of Coinusons by the exertions of the people out of the House of Com mons. He agreed with an Honourable Gentleman who had addressed them that evening, that they were not bound to point out the precise period in our history to which the representation of the people was to be assimi lated; the people had a right to dem sod the very beet Government that could be obtained, and if their ancestors bad not obtained it, it was ne reason why their posterity should not.—(Applause.) The Cataittsta:s next gave—" Sir R. Fergusson, J. Hume, Esq. the Hun. Douglas Kinnaird, and the Re formers of Scotland." Sir R. Fancussox, in returning thanks, observed, that his lion. Friend (Mr. Heine) 100 l done more good in Parliament tl.att any Scotch Member had rest. done ; though it was incorrect to talk of Scotch members, for Scotland had in fact no representation at all. Mr. Hems declared, that in his opinion, a Radical Reform could alone place the country in that high and commanding situation in which it was entitled to staml. fly a Radical Reform, hr meant *mit a reform as had been described by his lion. Friend, Mr. Ricardo, well a change in the representation as should give the people a paramount influence in the House of Commons. Mr. BRUCL retnrned thanks in an appropriate speech, on his health being drank by the meeting. The nest toast was, " Dr. Lushington, and the Inte grity of the liar." Dr. LUSHINGTON reprobated, in the strongest terms, the conduct of the landed interest, whom he described as basely deserting the cause of the people upon all oc casions. He confessed that in the present instance be could expect nothing from their candour, as they• were only influenced by their fears. lie could not forget the transaction at Manchester nor the fact that this outrage wascountenanced by magistrates and justified by Minis ters, who still enjoyed the support of the landed interest. Neither could lie forget the case of the Queen and the conduct of those Gentlemen upon that occasion. lie be lieved in his conscience that revolution must precede reform ; he would caution every man I. avoid that en. tremity. but if ever be should bare to chase between revolution and despotism, lie would take the first.— (Load applause.) The CHAIRMAN then proposed the health of the fol lowing Gentlemen, who severally returned thanks : Mr. J. Williams, Sir 0. Robinson, Mr. W. Williams, Col. Johnson, and Mr. Peter Moore. The meeting broke up at a late hour this morning. fr7StELLIGENCE. COURT OF WINO'S BENCH, MAT 23. London Siftings tfter Easter Term, before the LORD Cater JUSTICA and Common Juries. PIGS P. MAT AND °TIMIS. This was an action on the case against M . May, Norton and May, respectable attorneys, for al ledged negligence in putting in bail In a wrong coon• ty, on behalf of the plaintiffs, fur whom they were 140tewed, lo defend en action from a bill of &- change, to which be had a good defence, whereby he was put to the expenee of debt and costs asnoanting to 31' 12/. Mr. GIinNEY for the plaintiff, and Mr. SCAILLETT for the defence. The plaintiff bad been arrested at the suit of a Mr. and Mrs. Nash, the latter of whom was administratria to a former husband, upon a bill of exchange for 229/.1 accepted by the plaintiff in favour of her deceased hus band. The plaintiff retained the defendants to defend the action on the ground of usury. Bail was put in by mistake for the plaintiff In Middlesex, instead of London, and, in consequence of the mistake, the She riff was attached for not bringing in the body. An attempt had been made to set aside the attachment, but it failed in consequence of the plaintiff not being able to make a satisfactory affidavit of merits. The She riff, therefore, was fined, and the plaintiff's bail were obliged to pay the debt and costs, which ultimately fell upon the plaintiff. It appeared that on the very , day the Sheriff was attached, the plaintiff is the suit had offered to compromise the action, by accepting 100/. ; but the negotiation went off upon the disco very of the mistake. Mr. SCaRLETT, for the defendants, contended that, at the utmost, his clients were only liable for about 81. or 91. the expence of the attachment against the Sheriff, inasmuch as the plaintiff could have no legal defence, and must in the result have been liable for debt and costs, if every thing had been done for him. lie ascribed the action to unworthy feelings on the part of persons behind the curtain. Mr. May, the de. fendant, bad been Vestry clerk to St. Matthew's, Beth nal-green. His successor in that office wu the plain tiffs prevent attorney ; and the plaintiffs attorney in the original action against the present plaintiff wat i the son of Mr. Merceron, a gentleman of some noto riety. It was not difficult, therefore, to conceive un der what circumstances this action was batched. The enter JUSTICE mimed up the case for the Jury, and the Jury retired for a considerable time, and found their verdict for the plaintiff—Damages two hundred pound.. PRICE OF STOCKS, .+T ONS O'CLOCK, THIS Btu* Eitoek India Stock. Ipr a. Red 78 . 11 Ditto Bon M a. a. put. 3 par Ct. I 0va..... :9l South Sea Stock.' OO 34 per Gat f4l 9 South Sea Old Asa a par Coats. 3 per Cts. Navy lO4ll 101311. 3 per Coat. 3OOl. 15.35. 2spia. LeogAos... ...... 1111 16.16 Small.. 3s. 6s. pm. Imp. 3pr Ct. Irish II ow Coat Lott. Tickets 10i. ISt. •; A Second Edition of Tug Sre•reeMAX will Lr published at half•past four o'clock this afternoon, con taining a fall account of the Oaks flare. Lt/Alitfiti: TItIDAT, KM:ISG, MAT 24, 1822. STOCK EXCHANGE, TWELVE O'CLOCK. Consols at pret-eut are fur the set:oust j9i 1, and for Money 79 to 1. There is but little business doing either in the British or Spanish Old, New 831 Prussian $b Dtaish ..... _64 • • Neapolitan ..71 010 Columbian. 1001 New 3itto .... XB6l FOREIGN FUNDS. PROCEEDINGS IN PAIILL In the Lords there was a discussiot vote of money for the relief of tht KING did not object to rite m aaaaa e; as most ineffectual and delusive. Ii :it appeared that there were actually half of'people starving, that the fifty proposed to be granted amounted to a bead, and that he hoped that no part intercepted in its application by whit that, under the pretence of making ro. possible that individuals might get roads their own Louses; that a great deal had tt other place about the rapacity of Irish that be could rapacious as represented, and were mitt son with the rapacity of Church titl merit taxes. The Earl of Lieu to hear chrrges thrown out eget and State Of Ireland ; and tbot ' that jobbers were to be found thought that they were to be land, ted. Lord Kura, rising to ex' that the measure was insufficient, and the tiovernment would not soothe the with having now done much for Ireland. their conduct would resemble that of tering the condition of the poor, swiss bees had voted their money in war tat. the poor; 'till, haring now voted away loaf, they now propored to solace them The Duke of Arnot, was sorry to which, instead of being at all coneilial exasperating. The Earl of BLESSIN , with Lord KING in every thing, e. the 'lnsufficiency of the sum granted, to regret, also, that an Wert ie ale tritately have been just d al distressed districts. The Marquess regretted that the measure was to be one.—Lord Livetir•mt, doubted very propriety of the measure ; and thought ciently large until he could see his the application of it. We agree en; With his Lordship, and such doubts regard to the application of the sum, would not have granted one single farthi purpose. •Even a. to the private sut will be jobs enongh ; and what then of the grant of pnblie money to be I: yes will, in whatever manner the Anise to lay it out. Yet Lord DAR. the present bill as a new and joyous tory of Ireland ! A new era! Does think. then. that we are to continue to Ireland in this manner, or ratite! Landlords ? We are quite certain tho be found to yield no relief to the pear yet Lord DARNLEY could think that ti sure, or any measure that would affu ought to be adopted. Now mind wool makes io conjunction with' intentioned by Lord BLEVIINGTON. county, seized upon by the Oovertieneet here are fifty-thousand periods out of by that Parliament which causes imposed and raised, for the relief of county ; so that, here are the tax % from the people with one hand by extent, and there are the Perliamentarj going cheeck-by-jowl along with the, driblet of money out of those taxes in Such a scene as this was certainly seem the world before. This is a new era,not b but for the Universe.—lt came out inr the Marquess of DOWNSIIIRS (he said' large proprietor of Irish tithes ; but I say, that he should be I.appy to make Mc altar of conciliation and peace. I act up to that declaration ; let the sect one; and let others follow his example, lot of Ireland will be mended indeed. lice, we understand, the giving of sometl abandoning of a part of the tithes, at deed, the total abolition of them where is Catholic, sad such a reduction of Dm leave the people some of the wheat and not reduce them to a miserable exist , barely sufficient to keep a poor pig take occasion to observe here, tht Chronicle, quoting from his favourite' has, at last, joined us in reprobatt. ragement of the practice of cultivating es food for mon! What, then, of nearly twenty yearsove have these tions ranging thenigelves on our side of potatoe eating, ...lath has earned ut heaps of wishy-washy trash poured fun friends and foes. Our Irish friend' extremely partial in other respects, strained to dissent from us with regard potatoes. Starvation in the midst of don amidst over-production ; the famine in the potatoe part of the proposition is made to the Par lam( into pawn on account of its superabui have brought people to their eeeee made them reflect a little ; and the only now right, but right upon out ground, name'', that the facility of mit of food, its nearness to the mouth, tht and of foresight and of preparation this species of food, are evils, and not bare always been represented to be.— moment, to the Debate, Lord Lima what Lord DGW3ARINII had said al measure relative to Irish tithes, °beet measure must depend on other mum maimed to he brought before Parliament if those other ineaeures were agreed ' ultimately be granted. 'f his was the oracular style. That is to dark. We do not know what those may be ; but we are satisfied that no geed to Irish tithes will be of so it include their abolition. IN tits Housa or Cost mosts.—The of Whitechapel, bythe hands of Mr. presented s Petition in favour of the tag thy ill-treatment of oattle ! Since been•passeel; we lam net laugh at • dose iu-adsers; • but we must take km the sinister humanity of these bet . phis Hitt theratergreatioiesa from • • • . 11 ' 1 MiNiNige i I ; . I . : ' • lA - MENT. 1 ion relating to the I .. ' ,he Irish. Lord bet regarded it lie observed, that a million and • y thousand pounds abont a shilling a 1 rt of this would be t tt were called job.; 1 ' roads, it was too roads made up to ad been said in an- ish landlords ; but deters were not so :1 'thing in romper'. t l+ , l . i • ithes and Govern- sauce was sorry i t ; v , ain't the Church , tugh he owned in Ireland, hi • 1 found in Eng- explain, observed, :. il ind that be hoped • their consciences t li land. if did. f •Society fur bat- die of whose mem- r taxes, which made j e , iway the qnartera F them with a roll. ,l t ' f io hear language, 'taus;, was quite : .: INSITON disagreed 1p 1 r , except u to ' i If • ranted. He had mid should anfor- • upon or of the If, e t as of Downantaa me but a temporar y I. • I cry much of the . fight the sum sue- i' s way clearly as to ntirely in opinion l i s h have we with sm, we certainly I i.' rthing for any such abscriptions there n are we to expect i laid*ont, do *hat e Irish landlords RXLET could hail us era in the hit- oes Lis'-Lordship is to grant money her, to the Irish 1 I that the thing will i t people at all ; and t; ii t the present mea- I fiord employment, : l what a figure skit (11 ii the extent in aid .t There is an Irish ,e sent fur tearer; and ill • i of the taxes, voted 1 voP,i • , 3 the tax es t o b e t I P / of that very same I I. 1 ' ' 1 r- gatherers taking by force, my Conmissioners ; ' ander an I : A i hem to distribute a 1 ! n the way of relief! never wit cl in lot Only forlrelend. incidentally that • I $ • d it hiroselOwas a t his Lordship did ke a sacrifice on Let his Lordship ;ecrifice be a real plc, sod then the i. lint, by seed- pmething up. The 4 I at least ; and, in- , I ere the population e ' the taxes as will i end the meat, and i 1 stence upon Muff alive. We must hat The Mg- ornin il i II 1 ' I I D " Scott:MM." to 4 atiog the encou- Wessling potatoes en, at the end I very able publics- t as to this subject , I us such monstrous 1 t I orth at us both by I I ode, in particular. 4 • I, have been con- rard to the use 6.1" • . , of plenty; stem- hideous bawl of VI il kingdom, while a , tient to take corn i ; hundance, seems to , s; seems to have 's 4 1 Scotsman is nor our own favourite , , , i faiaing this siwcirs the absence of care 1 I n that exists as to I l' - I tut benefits, as they .—To return, for a eI , meow., in noticing I • , 'bout the intended bserved, that that lessures which re- new. Aed that. to, relief might I itl ~t 'as very :apnea is i say, it was very ose other measures o measure with re- auy &bail without be carcase butchers r. Alderman Weepy. ,e Bill for punish- nee Sir Acts have t any thing said or cave to observe on etchers, who comp l ' to the carelessnen ti, , (' I * -.. ...•-......., - , .. 1 4. fte Ibtatelonan. " INS •lIITIIU ITATZSM•N" IS INCOMPII AAAAA WITS " TIM STATIISMAN."