The Statesman. — London, England, 1813-01-14 00:00:00

Or — , . . . • and open trial, before tstrelye honest - and I Tl ‘ . men, and if the case is not made uut against . the full extent of the indictment, the humanit the lawalerhys decides most favourably for the oil. ... ~der. Bet in cases of Bankruptcy, a man is no . ,ffilfrered even .to ; know. what is charged against him, : Wlhereby he has incurred the forfeiture of the con-. tgoul over his own affairs and property, which occa sions his character to be. pronouneed'base in the Or sate, and all the Newspapers in the kingdom; al if his certificate is withheld, complete ruin to Mr eel( and family, or at least their .removal from L future . respectability and comfort, is in most cases the consequence. Then, my Lord, is it not just that there should deod and substantial proof.of some act of fraud . ee ption against a man, before he is consigned over to such great and extensive ruin and disgrace? , . e t our Lordship has been pleased to express in my case, that I was too late in my application to you, Lords ii. to have the Bankruptcy superseded., though, at the last hearing, I understood your Lordship ' say, there was some ground to questien'the •I3ane zuptcy ; and your Lordship allowed me to retain such poems aitl (Wier merits tnewere necessary to my d. . that fence, against the ejectment of. the Assignees, which : -----!ealdshilh . . . . I stated to your Lordship I expected would decide i the whole funds and effects belong ing to the wife ! Secretary, and on I they might make such re the question of.the Act orßankruptcy ; but the As- ' should be given up to him, without any alteration of marks as should occur e to them to be proper. His., signees fearing the event of this trial, and seemingly l'the provisions of the settlement, as far as it was In . Lordship had come to his decision in this case, on ; ' conscious that they'could notesuseain the Bankrupt-1 his favour, and as i t could now be acted on. Mrs. L. the fact of the marriage between the parties having cy, w i lithely the record, and would net proceed to in her petition complains of the manner in which the taken , place in the year 1804 ; on the fa c t that t h ey; • i trial, but have since taken forcible possession of the ' marriage had been brought about with a Ward of the lived togetheteas tar as appeared to his Lordship, bar.; premises, and by taking' off my eeeeni„ger and i Court, and contended, that in such circumstances i rnouiously, for .a.,,cousiderablis length of time after ; p thesettrement should have devoted the whole of the their; marriage e and, finally, on the conduct of both potting on their own, still keep possession, and ex property to her, and that the whole of the pro- lof the parties themselves. With these observations, dude me. possession or expectancy should he settled his Lordship took leave of the case. I fear , my Lord, it has not been so fully stated ; Pert) . in on herself, and on the children, not oily Of the TOE CORPORATION OP COLCUEsTER v. LOIVIEN. • by my Couusel (not imputing any thiug to the 1 ; present marriage, but of any future - marriage site , Mr. W EVIAIO.a. and Mr. Hoare were this day Learned Gentlemen), as I meant it should. at the I might contract. She grounded this claim og the doc- !heard in thii case for the Defendant. They divided bearings before your Lordship, that I al:ca,ys disa. trine of the Come, said to keen been laid down in 1- heir argumentlnto four distinct parts. Firet, They vowed haring committed any act of Bankruptcy ;! end not having been able for several years to see the the case of Miller and Roes, in .7th Veseg, jam . - ended that there was nothing to restrain a Civil , proceedings, to know upon what grounds the Com - Ip. 413, which Mrs. Lee contended in her petition orporation from making alienations of their pro- , mission was opened, I could not tell what designingwas completely applicable to her case. When this , derty though not for corporate pdrpesei. •edly, • marriage first came before his Lordship, behead tiohi ley contended that the bond and mortgage in ques men might have sworn against me, at the private Meetin s before the Commissioners, as I was as- help observing, that it was a• marriage which had :ti itwere granted clearly for corporate purposes. sured I had some invidious, and very desperate erne- g been contracted with a Ward.of Court, and, there- [ 3 y, Supposing the arguments of theOefendanteto miss; and my first Solicitor, under this dieadran foree that a contempt of Court had been corn- Ibe ufounded in both of these two first points,- still loge, declined to petition your -Lorcisaip to super mitted: When the petition came before him, which I they contended that the subsequent efeeence and sedenthe Bankru tc because it was not so certain first brought that point under consideration, he ; award put a stop to all farther attempt on the part p y, that your Lordship would do so, as that you would fall" that he had to dell with a 'case, of• which all lof the Corporation to get the better of he securities order the removal of the Assignees ; and, in the first he knew was, that a contempt of Co•urehad been; in question, and took from the Cour all right to' case, being without money myself, the Solicitor was committed in 1804, while the circumstance had not iinterfere between the parties : and 4th , An order I not so certain of the payment of 'his bill. Since been mentioned to tile Court till the moment that filed been nude by the Corporation fo raising then - that, the Commissioners have, in several instances, petition was presented. On that fact, he should !sem of'2oool. • Mr. Lowten, instead of utting them declared and shown their hesitation, as to the act of make no further observation than what he had for- ! to the ineowienience of borrowing this s to, had, io , ' Bankruptcy ; and, within a few months past ,. the done. The parties lived, for what his Lord- , effect, himself advanced 'it to them, b taking a first Solicitor under the Commission, has acknow- ledgod that there was no act of Bankruptcy, and has the ship knew, ip harmony, till about 1 8 1 1 then the.' mairtgege ' instia of his Money, and being a ' Lady eloped—a case of adultery - was proved—and a' stronger, could eat 'be* affected by any .act of 'the advised me, through a friend of mine, how to pro- divorce a mensa et thoro was obtained against her.. Select - Body, "in titling an:imlitopet use PC the trust coed under the ejectment, to bring the question to Though there was no doubt, whether the communie i tePosedlh thetas.' - - ' '' 1 - eil • cation of such a fact as' the marriage of a W a rd of 'I -Sir S. Rom-Lavin reply, answered • tl . points au issue. From hence it will be seen, t h at I have suffered in Court, ewithotit the consent of the Court, was andel lit theisattieleth 'Ai - to - the first; heconteaded that character aed circumstances, the most intemperate early or late, that the Court had a power to puniselel the Court had a jurisdiction over every• tease pro ; that contmpt--it did appear to his Lordship not tert . perte whamefele - All Tower was held by the King persecution and deprivation, for nearly seven years Ibe a very ' wholesome discretion to punish such an of. for the benefit of his 'subjects- all charters granted (a common tern of transportation), not merely • without my offence being legally established, but 1 feiwe at so gceat a distance of timei unlese the :by King were granted ' for the good of the with implied, and even avowed felmissionr of some of I Court was very poh-erfolly called on to exercise such ; ceminunity ; and Those tcrwhom they were granted ; the party, that I had committed no Offence in the discretion. Certainly the facts which had been since , were bound - to employ . them for the common be- premises. It is also evident, my Lord, that this ' discussed—facts which' his Lordship contd. not agree), befit or those for whom they were granted to.them matter has hcan carried on against me by a combine- with Mr. Lee, as stated in his Petition, were irrele. ; in trust.—On the second point, the Learned'eoun , tion of men, who were conscious of what they were vast to betaken into consideration in snaking a - set- ;lie contended, that it was impoisible td conceive - doirg, and who have no pretence of ignorance, or I dement—because his Lordship could not think that I titatilie bond and mortgage iti - question could. have plea of general benefit to the creditors ; and that, ; the manner in which a marriage might be contracted, ; been granted for *a corporate purpose. If it was a ' therefore, they ought to abide by any conseggence of : should in no case call on the Court to attend to it I corporate interest, that the candidates either for the their conduct. Indeed, my Lord, the affa'frs are in *Ale making a settlement of the lady's foet e ne_...! office of Recorder or of Member of Parliament should that state (not one of your Lordship's orders having those facts, his' Lordship said, Were such as, he !be freed from expence, then ought the expeuces of been complied with), that there is no hope, or even .thought, would not only have justified - hi m in eica- l• &int candidates to have been paid, and not those of possibility, of due justice to the creditors, till the; minin g minutel y into the circumstances of the settle- . one only, and that, too, of him who in the present questions is legally determined—lVltelher I ant 0,4; ment, but if represented recently after the marriage, instance turned' out to be the unsuccessful candidate, on not ,a Bankrupt? wh , en every . ; one concerned would hay would know his duty, and must pe r form it. : e compelled him to take very strong steps so that 'the majority of the Corporate Body were' . in support 'of the jurisdiction of the Court, and ' compelled to pay the costs of their unsuccessful op, To effect this desirable end, I most humbly sup _ I might even -:hare led him to order a prosecution.; ponent. One item of the accounts in question was plicate your Lordship's directions how I can pro- I against smite Of the parties'coucerned, for -a had for defending the Mayor against a prosecution for an ceed ; and that the Assignees may furnish me with ; rac y . The q uestion which his Lor d ship had before ' undue return. Such return was no dOubt made by . the needful sum to beer the expences of such proce- him now,. in the year 1813, was one of irdirtitte dif- him in his capacity of Mayor, but still not as a cor-' dure, or that they may pay me the Dividends assigned; ficulty indeed. it was not a question in which he had ' porate, but as individual act, in which his own over to my two friends, as stated by me to your no interests to consider but those of this Gentleman . judgment only was consulted ; and as well might it Lordship at Westminster, the 27th of January, of r and Lady ;for after the best consideration lie bad been , be maintained that the expenccs of a Sheriff, against which there is now about 1001. coming to me, the ;wide to give to the subject, he could see no way of ' . whom an action was brought; charging him with withholding of which by the Assignees has occasion-404h% any essential alteration in the settleeeent, be. i havihg made a false return, ought to. be paid by a ed lately the bed 1 slept on, and every thing I pciehl cause he might therebyprejadice theinterests of the issue: county rate, as that the items in question were pro sessed, to be taken from me for the sum s of 151. for of the marriage. His Lordship did not think the Court perly }mid out of the corporate funds. The fourth rent of a small house in Somers Town and an ar- s ;would authorize Mr. L. eto de any thing to hurt the /whit, the Learned Coutrsel also disposed of, by . rest by my butcher for 131. for which, with the ex- interests of the issue of this marriage ; and as far as stating, that it was not contended by Mi. Lowten pences (together above 301.), I must go to the Mar- the petitions of Mrs. Lee went to the subject of her himself, who was a man of the strictest honour;that ohalsea prison next Friday, unless, in the mcau time, fortune, the Court had no right, event if it had the not a single farthing had been leht to him by-the I ern enabled to raise tine money. . power, to concede to the prayer of it. i his point Corporation ;on the contrary, he admitted that the I can only rely on your Lordship's humane consi- had been treated in Mrs. Lee's petition as if founded . mortgage in question was granted.in satisfaction of deration of the estretne pressure of my situation, for on a doctrine supposed to have been laid down in his bill of costs. Sir Samuel was proceeding to 'the forgiveness for approachiug your Lordship in this that Court. His Lordship, however, diii not owlet.- ' thirsl.andesely remaining point. . ir, eeirlar manner. . . stand the doctrine with respect to marriages of wads --''' the Lento Cniecreeott said, he should be glad to I am, my Lord, . ' • - without the consent of the Court , to be exactl y such ' hear him On It to-morrow. - • With the profoundest humility and deference, . • 'as it was stated to be in Mrs. Lee's petition. 'lf the., ------ Your Lordship's 111 present were a case where there could be nib doubt I Most dutiful and devoted servant, that a beggar .was • alsout marrying a woman of for- EDMUND TOWNSLND. tune, merely for her fortune, and without any af fection for her person, in such a case the Court would not allow him to touch that property'; and the Court ' generally acted on this principle. But his Lordship was not aware that the Court had ever gone the length of saying, that where, by that•species of indite I eretiou which was certainly looked on as blameable, ; two persons were brought together of equal fortiute, that the Court would' then pay no attention to the equitable settlement between the parties, the husband bringing into the settlement a fair and equitable proportion and equivalent. Under such circum stances his Lordship did not know -the Court would be inclined to lay down such a • doctrine as that stated in Mrs. Lee's petition. In consider , ing the settlement it was also very difficult to make any alteretioo, .from this circumstance, that.though, in the year 1805, when the settlement was made, it „might have been disapproved of by the Court (though his Lordship did not mean to say it would), yet be did not think the Court would e••• - ' ' tciexpress diaapprohation now, on wet which had since occurred, and the original settlement itself. Lee herself also required conaiderale might have excited stronger auii Lordship, were it not that cumstances of the marriage as casioning those circumstances curred. His Lordship was not No. B. Ctrtritnii•orrel, Stkiner, fokiii, April 1812. • COrit OF A LET rim TO I'HE LORD CHANCELLOR. Itly Lose,-1 attended this morning at , West minater to pi-esent your Lordship with the inclosed Paper but on tweittiottlngtNe trafgre of it to a Genj tieman of the Coutt, he thought.it would be less in. trusiva to sendit to your Lortigliges house. • Presuming It may be the last trouble to your Lordship, I. will attend in the Court of Chancery on Wednesday morning to know your Lordship's plea sure, unless, in the mean time, I have the honour of a cutarattilicrtion through any other mode. I buys the honour to be, my Lord, Your Lordship's • „Devoted and very humble servant, • EDMUND TOWNSLND. ' Lim' are Toww, Mondry April 1819. • T , ) the Right HMI. Lord Eltlfon, Lord • MO Chaneeflor,&e. &e. Bedfurd kqwsre. Nare..—On Thursday, the cnd, about I'2 o'clock, 'after waiting Lill then in Court, I went to his Lord ship'; house, and saw the servant, to whom I - de. livered the address, who assured me his Lordship had . I then - returned to the Court for about another hour. Ills Lordship did not sit in Chancery yes te: day. • & T. _ bu gun at the Prosecutor, at thv seine ring • he would blow - his bowels out.' The Prosecutor on this retreated, and the' Prisoner took apw stole and threw it at him—it.. struck .Ikizoo mote bjlint on -the hip, and caused lameness -4 swot stout) yocls him 'on the back. Enrage(r.bt•tar i Ate' °tor rushed forward, wrested tint - gulf rota eke'. risoner, and knockod him , down; hedged that he afterwards :psilled - :off-dtbrprott, and challenged to fight .ttio yvtiPl detated.— , The Prisoner dveleret. that . on his email . ' "toto the field, the Prosecutor accosted 'lO very ?pro brious language, and rrit ;Pin* high. &scribed the Prosecutor as4 , 4lrtf.iittil tittait,; aikrtrtat he had knocked 'him - tenti{ , and that, when the blood ..begitss to lo ""iiiiiito, s a id, " there, d—n yonr..efoo r Pee feppotkotror vessel, hoW it.?" This was denied by the evidence for thePrpseru 'tion. Mr. WoTsom, who -presided, summed tip and ex plained the nature of an assault to the Jury, who immediately found Smith Gorky, and Acquitted the others. Mr. WATSON, in passing sentence, said, that the Prisoner had acted in the capacity of gamekeeper to Alr:WoOd, and it was right for all such persons to know that they were not authorised to take a gun from anyperson shooting on the landof their employers. Lf the Prisoner had taken the gun in question, he might have been.tried for a very different offence— it would, perhaps, have been a felony ; the Prisoner, had been guilty of an assault., arid the Court seuten.:ed ' him to be imprisoned one month. % OLD BAILEY, 14x.13. - This day, the Sesstoilimmimeaced betbre the Lord Chief Ba ron Sir ARCHIBALD lifactiortstm, Barau . Wooo, the RICOItDER of Loudon, and several of the Magistrates. Jaws itainbridge stood Indicted, for tracing stoles) 311 pairs - of silk stockings, value 101. the property of A idiom Ward. The Prosecutor stated that he kept a hosiery shop, in Swat low-street,-parish of St. James. On the eveniu4 of the 11th of Ileceibber 1 ist, he placed a parcel of silk stockings which be longed to his costomers on the counter of his shop. Seven ii.,ir of these stockings belonged so Lord Castlere . agh. They were all Ittli.en away from his shop early neat morning, while he sat at breakfast. In his cross examination by Mr. ARABIN, he admitted ilin Lord Castlereagh possessed many other pairs of silk sti.cktogs, and as they were all distinguished by . one mark, he coal(' not he positive that the stockings found in the Prisoner's possession were those which he hail laid an his counter. The Prosecutor's daughter stated, that the Prisoner, accom panied by another person, came into her father's shoe on the 15th of December, about nine o'clock in the moruitig, and re ouested to see her father or her mother; she went into the par 11.nr to call them, and immediately returning, she found Cm l'risoner and kis comp miou gone, nod the parcel of silk stock ings also.: she raised a hue and cry after them, and the Prisoner was knocked down in Portland-street s and secured by a hiker. A young man said, he saw the Prisoner while he was rutaitag • cast away a bundle, which, on picking up, he found to contain the stockings taken from Mr. Ward's Shop. The Jury, after considerable hesitation, Acquitted the Ni -1 toner. . i James flamillun, a youth, of 16 years of age, stood indicted for assaulting James Payne, in the hing's highway, and taking forcibly from his person a steel chain, a hook, a metal key, mid a silver seal, his property. • The Prosecutor, who was a very old man, said, he was ermine by the corner of Wardour-street, u:l the evening of the thli of 1 December. when the l'risarter rushed against him, turned hint forcibly about, and plucked away the appendages of-his watch. i 'fhe assailant then ran away, nail passed into a pu'Alic-nou-e. I whither he was followed by the Prosecuttse, where he begged `. his pardon for having ran against hint. and that he would liaise • him auy satisfaction to his poorer for having broken his non eltahr. He immediately conveyed, hint to st, Andrew's "tv:•tch house, where he was searched, and neither chain nor key, &c. ...were found upon his person. The ,Jury having heatotedaconsiderable time in pronouncing their verdict, Baron WOOO enquired if be could give them itnY . Anti starce ? Uponarhieb one. ofiliesJarynsen said, " 1 hav e strong doubts whether or not the pikroan had, at that period, a clan at his watch." Payne wits 'ugh% Called, aneesamitiell t he had looketlat his watch witawflie cloak streek . four, lac chain Was then attached to it ; he teat the watch •tig,geri iii Ins pocket by the Prisoner ; he conceived that 'catch and all n:.+gone. POLICE. - The Jtwv then examined the watch, with the remainder of ti;• - . .' chain, and pronounced the Prisoner 7,5,t Gaitto. • .. . • --or— - 1 Jane Neteland, only 1:1 years of age, was indicted for st..aloe.; FORGED NOTES. a• silver watch, with gold - chaia• and oesiti, the property of BDIW-XTREET.--Tuesday.evening Jui&N Wilson was brought to .' ti the Oifice,in the.eustody of Salmon, charged with feloniously At- i , oamttel V• ymer. teeing a forged Bank of England Note. - The Prosecutoestated, that the Prisoner lived With her mother in Ms house, and had access to Ms chamber where his watch . lad , It appeared that the Prisoner went to the Bell Pultlic..house; . i t b e i ng f requen tly un l oc k e d. On the 24th of l'„ceanher it w as in Leicester-square, on Monday evening, and had a glass of gin , sto l e n : an me aes s day h e g ai t ; the Deisooer's souther Change and water ; he tendered a supposed one pound Bank of nag- ' . f or. „ ;I, . no t e , An d on t h e , T iA n i ng ,aft e r r u e ;miaow, The same land Note in payment. The landlord not having out to procure it, The Prsaoner went away, saying changeSedt ' day he received iuformation Owe tiptivvnbroker, Mr. Eve hide, and would call agaia for the change. On his return . he *el 1 ° that Ms watch gad been plesiged,there for Hs' by a yount un man : he went immediately, and was ipformed, that one of the he was informed that several neighhotirt had been applied to for Change, but they had rehtsed, being of opinion it was a had ! notes he received from We -Pilsouer's miller was given to the person who pledged the watch.. .. -....• •• • - one. He was asked where he got the note 1 - He replica," W'hat ! is that to you.'* He refused to tell where he lived, but laid he, The Jury Noun her frailly, but recommended her tO mer,y, on account of her youth. '. • .t. .. 4' • had 'test come from Lincolnshire, and had taken the note on the j , he was informed t The P omor i c is now corn . • • COACH. . , .... .g..-...-7.-...., t : This account not tieing deemed satisfactory, he by Ciapt. CA tai t he must be detained, togeter with the note, upon which he stid- A •• 0 itenly jumped up and rushed out ot' the housp. He was pursued. -it ETI late , of the • . Nstiosl. The : i on. Copt. F six tit by veveral persons,talliagstop thief, and be was stopped and comman d the Pomune, but has been compelled IP i s''' secured in the King's Mews. ° Si'm her from severe indispaition. John Lees, the Inspector of Bank of England Notes, proved' P,., . that the note was forged. " undertoo k, - I on. Saturday last . a butcher . for s ' 'Die Prisoner in his dehmee said he was a farmer ;that he I waver of ' twenty pounds to run from Shooter`t•-iiiii came from Stamford on Wednesday morning by the coach ; that , e' s ten be changed a two -pound Bank of England Note at Warm- , to Welling, Kent, a distance of two 'miles, in ford, and 'received die note in question in change. Be wen! . minutes, which ho accomplished in nine minutes and the Bell publiceitoatelo enquire for a person of the name of a half and five seconds. The same person has offer _ . • , .. . .. . , . -• . . . . •• , . - . • stilt; S. 1 , -...,. j . ~,...... .. . .. _ . , il i ii c —. '1... 6 direct -1 1 ), - ii,:. .t , -• , t a consPhitcY ;. not even - . ',31/DPIe SEX pS . RSSIONS o . Je er. ta.. • npartial LAW • .... • . 4 • ' 1." ' II ' , 14: i. . , — to greet.** a.. -'. . ~ or a continent ; Her Let tO : Aim to . e'er/ P°lat unimportant cesesi the only matter of general in. ,„. • , The (Apart was oceisiged, holiest* a naleter of . . 4 . NC , V.!. • • COUitT . 0? Mit gRY J IS . - ' dieeet efty',:' "-• • • 4' itele the children'. unnsi-] Laity l)f . m offen- . iix tr.. tit 'Cent* Ts. • - .', ! ' detitiff thilkillit l4 lie' . ho : - Itad dont,' in . the . . invest was the ((Mewing : . is not ' The Lone Cisaxalt.tosi.,' in deliveri6g his judg. ! , .of vitas,: • istst-..see: how, with respect. to ~,. 'Warrington • there gyres also a crliss-iiolia meitt altered. by him.— , s e hi m meat in this case, stated that this was a case which 'childketils Otiffattlessont could be .„, , , . *irk Malik was Indicted for an assault on John le con- ' had been mealy:before, the Master, and, as it Wei His . ..tordshje .., ... Oiled ,tand he woald hand to one of cia,siderahle iabiculty and intricacy,.. . • • . he the Learned : 1 1,6 • iitilnieutes on whith the re..." . .:1 once-against >Jahn Warridgktri and --.-- Pearson for as. t b e Ge • should go through the - different circu m s t an ces of it, liult . of lii4iiti ';'' -. till Of the case was founded) . to . saulting- Hugh Smith. . and the evidence- pranced ) that on the 9th of Au: and as detailed in the Masteloit - Report. ' His Lordship aiterin seine ' Wets • the provisioni of the settle. - - It appeared, ,by the statement of the CounA Bust last, the PrOseotito - r, 'Obit 'Warrington, who i s Til t ; hi - accordingly prerectied to go through the :wholes of 'ulatit'svith.ltalptiOt tu Mr. and Mrs. Lee, not to the the son of the Reverend Mr. Warringfon„ of Palm ! m il . the circumstances of the case, from the marriage of . extettt. ! whiels Jia . Master proposed • t . o . ma k e the i rsotma cases Catharine Ball to Francis Lee, in 1501; the varibuSialbrOo y a beitt ha-, Wenktvery• the provision with broughtre- -1 tto rs: Lees foture.!expectancies , by giving passion and field belonging to Mr. lirood, the master of Smith. I settlements made op.eXch aide; the property spec . , . . . and a student at Geoid, was trying a •grin i In a he wus shooting . at. !wallows, in company with tee m he :in by the uife, to the aviount of 10 5 01 . a year ; her her some interest i agy ,contingencies !Mee might race ud 'or ' for the mai t subsequent elopement ; end the fact of •Mr.. Lee hav- fall. , lita i Lorda .1-1, ad quite made up his judgment Mr. Cox, and Pearson, Isis butler , was in Attend- ' big obtained a diroiee•igainst her, is ass e n t s et thoro,' , arto not a lowl .the 5001. a-year mace, Smith battle to them in a great over before the Ecclesiastical Conrt. From a eoasidera - mince of the chit a. He had always had,. mile!! a sti e li . 1 in in ' Lion of the whole: of which circumstances , ' the continued !chive; very great doubts the to the pro- said, I have ' heel'' looking for nod ' a long ' tittle, to i y our Y Master was of opinion that:the original settlement priety of tatinichildren from under controul of and now -d — ti dour eyes, I . have"ciught you. - though '. of 3001 • a year of pin - money was too small for a ; their parents , during their-life-time, by giving-them Ile also since he would have the gun. Air: i sh i pte ' woman of. Airs. Lees . fortune, and it ahead 'hive 1 property which .the parents would not like to im. Cot had the . gnu, and -Mr. Warriegtou took it , • iliiiiit been 6001.'a year. • * This Report of the Master had ; part to thew themselves. With respect to the other • • , •should make some been unsatisfactory to both Mr . and Mil. Lee; and , , parts of the case, his Lordship obi such Prosecutor, with the butt of 'ilia gun, and th • 'redoes which the Coonsel on both sides would de- ,in consequence, both of them presented petitions to t . alte , . my - Prosecutor immediately knocked him down. The hitch •r, w would be handed his. L ordship. .By Mr .- L.'s petition, he prayed that tfilici in the- -Minutes; , whith ,prisoner in an instant jumped up and levelled his gun 1 2.....:a_ the whole funds and e ff ects belonging to the wile I S ecr e tary , and on which they might make such re- a t the Prosecutor. at tiro same titeteeireartine ha limy gi. %goulash yz4 me t o the Bell putdierbaase - to enquire for a persou of the name of Id much like to express Leaos. . a half and five seconds. T ()do he same person has - xount of circumslances 1:e was committed for farther examination. ed to run ten miles within the hour. Wednesday J oine r Cook was brought to the O ffi ce, and node'''. and not On account of• __....,—. went a no ther examination, cha r tattering isiffirged draft 1 - f. The conduct of Mrs. ftr upwards 41001. to a shopwao of Mr. Cooper, linen - draper , ; DIED. taiderable attention, and .11.piew Ben4-street, parmrting to be drawn by J i ro!' Bennett ' Oa Tuesday.morning last v afier a short illness. Mr. Alevaintee on Messr. alpoleaad in Lora -street. e was cons. Grant , a reipectulle Master-Printer. of the Floreag i lo. Wit*" animadversions from his i pig e d fur f ur th er exam i al oi ni . • • Sated au unsullied repntation, Rini n heart honouthhie a l4ll , shetjio leaded the cir- *. , - , - ., - • Rai; and. has left many relatives bind w ee d s , kola, ill i ' Ill attire; they doplore their loss, can never forget hi . , ausuerops vitises. as having n"P''nti ,ll in oc.• • The 10111 13tla , acid -18th IStb Regtments ot. Horsei r• • ' •- , - ~ O, ..... aa ..... , . 'es whia hid' dice oc. lofting** flissr,l3jigide i ifill embark for Lisbon i teN nem , !'rioted and I'u b list 4 4 h „, b: ~ p'„,,i, ... 'ls udt belt ed l at this deb a a law days. ' , 11141•1111*All ;)=rtes.C. ritilt4l Vitt. • . 1 iy. l l