The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-06-29 00:00:00

JAIPBRIAL PAALLIMANT. HOUSE OF LORDS, Pamir, Jona 2s. Ear' FITZIFILLIAII presented silt Petitions from ne.s and Occupiers of Land, in the county of York, ag. of the torn Importatioit Act Amendment l a w ra the table. TR The Earl of LAUDERDALE held a Petition which 1 deur Jet d one of the hardest cases that bad ever come to his knowledge. It was that of a woman of the name of N a ry Deacon, who stated that she and her busband were conned for the same debt. She bad beep married to a f o rmrrhusband, and the debt for which she was confined had been contracted daring her widowhood. insolvent Debtors' She bed aped to the Commissioners of th hart. but they could not allow her to take the benefit or the Act, es being now a married woman. abe co uld ant execute the deed which that Act requir ed , b y w hi ch she etroitld relinquish all future property which she might acquire for the benefit of her creditors. She ohairld he therefore imprisoned for life. unless some : marl. • hostel he made to reach her case in the B i ll see !,. fore l e their Lordships for Amending the Insolvent Lebto, Act. He (the Earl of Lauderdale) trusted that if the ceeetureed oat to be as it was represented, some risen weed be Inserted is the pending Bill to give her relict The Petition . mas then read, and laid on the table. Sir J. tiftAHAM. the Honourable ti. BENNET. and siblitertirought up the Alehoose Licenses Bill, and se veral mute Bilholaws the Gosurmons, which were read a first time. .. Alr. Jarmo, from the Custom-house. presented an &coast of the Quantity of Oold Bullion exported &- Hi g die lair hill year, and of the Count r i es t o w hi c h tr e exportation bad taken place.—Laid on the table. Mr. Tetsiox then presented an Account of the Rates use fells paid bind], on the Royal Military CanaL keid ve the table. ' • MARRIAGR ACT. On :he Medea of Lord ELLIDOOROUGR, the adjourn ed (rebate on the Report of the Marriage Act Amend ment Bill was resumed. , The Earl of LIVERPOOL suggested, that it would rim the time of the House if the clauses and provisos whisk had been penned, but owl yet received, were read. seripit to the vote on. by owe. • Tie LORD CR4NCILUDI'S bspt proviso, extending the exception from the operation a the Bill to those mar riages' theinvalidity of wide% hill been directly or in orientally proved urea' the triad any issue touching !lair validity. or the legitimacy Slimy other person, was then pat, and agreed to. The LORD CHANCELLOR would now propose a . lease, which he had be hesitation to say, after what ;ad passed, their Lordships would not adopt. Its object' as tonal, valid the sales or transfers of iouary sights fir good and valuable considerations, and to de ei.re that the estates or rights to which persona should e, or should become entitled, if the present Bill bad never passed, should be deemed to belong to such per son as purchased them. If such a clause were not vlepted much injustice would be done to individuals, who l snag purchase-11/w reversion of estates twenty or thirty years ago, bad ever since relied oa their coming into their possession, sud bad perhaps disposed of them • is their wills. The Noble Lord proposed to turn what was a teal sale into a mortgage, one tweeters the pur chase loamy, with interest he supposed; to the original lint±er, bat would be .be found, and even Him were, week net the nature ,of his property be changed by , this trsr.taction, so. aslegsappoitit his bell as bib in it w % ditotti to whom make oth. important ail • ference that ha slitiuld have. personal Instead areal mt . !? Bart of LA UDBACFAEN coatendei Vest filch • r Luse nunid do away the retrospective clause and that . Amu property, and would be attended with more mon aressconsessencts than the Marriage Act itself as it tun stood. Marriages would be validated, c:rildren would be rendered legitimate, but the property taken sway from - them to revert to some uncle or other rele• tion who might leave it to bastards of his own ! lie .tainisi , e 1 that reversionary interests were contingent, and ho• real interests, as the Noble and Learned Loth ~ .:anted the ~, and should vote against the clause. ...the I ORD CHANCELLOR explained, end contend that reversions were es good as vested estates. Their Lore. Ipe would do what they roosidered to be justice, 1 bat he *maid be no party to what he looked upon as an art of ~ iniquityf 'I he rl of RONSLY clime, N opposed the as setti ng , sirs ni. re. l ienity rights against those of possession, and I r... ~.g titles to families nhilst it would deprive them or the Ileum of supporting them. it e LORD CHANCELLOR would venture to say, 1!•:• , ten peers would not pass over ere their Lordships w:- 11 seriously repeat having adopted such a measure as the present. • : n::.I ELLENBOROUGH maintained that the 1 rd t, vhich the clause teas intended to establish were , int:. :•rtal rights, end of a dishonourable use, and such al the !so never was intended to protect. Th.. Karl J 1 HARROW BY was understood to support the el. lie, and to exi.:cas his intention of dividing the lieu„ la the iinestitan. The Earl of LIVERPOOL agreed with !lie Noble etqwei re; that marriages havin g once been declared Ta b.+, itinividuals should not be allowed afterwards to do any thier against their validity • but Le wi s h e d t h at a•net they hart d one , an d what ;hey had a right to do before that validity was declared, should be maintained. The cement clause could only be rejected on the ground tit ... rouniages were rendered valid air initio and in all thrii i.esequences. The loose then divided— Ilin:.tent, 25 ;—Xon-cuntents, •42;—Majority against • rile t , use, 17. I a icing re-admitted, we found the LORD CHANCEL 'It ~, !itiog, as we uotiorstood, on the clause for grant - , oder:lnky to third persons who should have put.- - -I :he reversion of an estate in the belief that the .-e of the original holder was not valid. Ilia • p expressed his locution of moving two claims • .: bird reading, and of again taking the sense of tie on a similar clause to that wrch Lad just i ected. .:srl of LIVERPOOL hoped that before his No t - .. i Learned Friend took the sense of the House on .e l 1 me in question, Noble Lords wonld re-consider .., an. ,f they found that its principle was what they :ne-iv-d it to be, they would no longer oppose Its adop. ..nir. As to the present clause, it was inconsistent with :•:c Rude principle of the Bill unless that which had -..n just rejected, should be allowed to form part of the • easet .. L.. , la HOLLAND admitted, that it was an exception . e ri..nr o from the principle of the Bill, but it hail only :me:. ivral eyed ro meet a case of hardship, stated by 'are N. le and Learned Earl on the Woolsack, and to .sarn, his opposition. 1!.: • AIRD CHANCELLON also thought,after what , , rt :. • n done, that the present clause would be ill , O•:r...us unless the authors of the measure would agree I ..d. mu h more than they seemed disposed to do. If i.... is , . were passed, in * less than a week, all indivi- I , *.o‘T 1, :e• had acted as trustees since 1754, would be I : , ' : date in Courts of Law. . • Marquess of LANSDOWNE conceived that the '.., * ,Id be better and more ., . co./9.d. consistent if t h at clause .ir L LLENBOROIaiII had only introduced .it to meet the objectious of the Noble and Learned Loid on tke Woolsack ; bat finding that the feeling of the house. as well as his own, was against it, he should irlth d raw the clause.—Agreed to. Lord REDLSOALE then proposed a clause to protect Executors and Trustees against suits and actions, on the part of IRS declared to be legiti ma t e , f or t h e wanner inwwMi for disposied of their property, before their legi sei Vl been declared.—Agreed to . sea excepting the R o y a l Family and the yowls Jews from the operation of the Bill. were then proposed he Lord ELLENSOROUGH and agreed to. Lord ELLENBOROUUH then moved that the Bill he read a third time on Tuesday next, and that their Lord ships be summoned fur that day.—Ordered. On the motion of the Marquess of Bows/smug the Re turns laid oo the table yesterday from the Board of Ile. cords in Ireland, were ,ordered to be printed.—Ad journed. iE OF COMMONS. CATHOLIC CLICKS!. Mr. JAMES BROWN gave notice, tbet early in the next Session he would submit to the house a se eeeeee e the elect of which would be the paent of the Catholic Clergy of Ir e land ou t o f the Reveoue.of the State. r Mr. CURWEN presented a petition from certain Ma nufacturers of, and Dealers in, Hard Soap, setting twill that the partial repeal of the Salt Tay would produce much hardship, nod praying for its total repeal.—Order • eil to he printed. The Thames Leafage and Mellastage Bill was wed •, 'coed - time and committed. Mr. ORATTAN moved for returns of all ships that had cleared out of Dublin Harbour in three years ending January 1, 1822, with a R e t urn o f t h e number of ships that had come into Dublin Harbour in the same time, specifying the Port Duties received, fee.—Ordered. The I' sussed Tares Composition Bill, as amended by the Lords, was takes into consideration, and agreed to, and ordered back to the Lords. NOWITIIII CORN. The Roasted Corn Bill nu read a third time, Sir R. WILSON called the attention of the house to the eau of those persons who had been punished for of , ferring routed corn for sale. They were unconscious of committing soy offence when they did that for which ' they had been severely punished, and their view of the , cue would seem to have been not very mach out of , their way from the introduction of the present measure. , He therefore hoped their case would be taken into coast . deratioo. lie thee moved a clause to authorise the re , imbursing of those who had been fined, to the amount of the tines which had been levied on them. Mr. T. WILSON thought it would be a ease of great hardship to enforce the penalties against the parties who had been engaged in selling roasted corn. Mr. H. SUMNER concurred with the view taken by the last speaker on ibis subject. Mr. W. SMITH thought the offence which bad' been committed was most venial, and supported the clause. Mr. CURWEN was anderstoOd to speak is favour of tire clause. ' Mr. LUSHINOTON objected to the clause, because it was wholly uniecessary, as the Treasury had now the power of remitting any fine. It was their wish to take the cases of the suffe into consideration, and there was every disposition on their part to afford relief, where relief could be properly extended. Mr. CALCRAFT said, had this clause been met with any hostile feeling by the Secretry to. the Treasury, he should have giveolhe clause his support. But as there Appeared a fair disposition on the part of tbe Hen. fiend.- man, and too that of the Chancellor of the Exchequer to I s te s iat ta maitteution the easekof elle partial o• whom, a imposed with a view to relieve those who deserved relief, be could vial. his. Hon. Friend to with draw the clause. The penalties, though in the whole their smarm° did sot exceed 8001. or lOW., were sutfi civet to prove the total ruin of some of the parties on whom they bed bee• inflicted. After the feeling which bad been manifested on the opposite side of the house, be thought his Hon. Friend would do well to withdraw the clause which be. had proposed, oo an understanding that the cues of those orbit had been fined would be fully, fairly, and favourably considered, with a view to the reimbursement of thou who, it should appear, had not wilfully controvened the law. Mr. Alderman WOOD wished the clause to pass.—A discretionary power bring left in the hands of the Treasury, would put it in their power to make a differ ence between those who had politically offended and others. Sir It. WILSON said the Lords of the Treasury in what they bad done on this subject, appeared to be ani- mated with a spirit of candour and liberality. which made him feel the less reluctant to leave the matter in their hands. He hoped the cases of the parties would be fairly considered ; and if in any instance as acrimonious cor respondence had already been ca:ried on, he hoped no reference would be bad to that in the decision which the Lords of the T y would feel theinaelves called upon to pronounce. He forged to withdraw the clause. The Bill was then passed, after which a short conver sation arose between Jir. W. Swam and ',Jr. LUSHISti- TON on the subject of the title, which in the cud received a slight alteration. SCOTCff JURY BILL Mr. KENNEDY moved the Order of the Day for the House resolving itself into a Committee on the Scotch Jury Bill. He stated it was not bis intention to press the Bill through all the remaining stages in the course of the present Session. Having obtained from the Se treaty of State the concession of en important privi lege for persons under accusation, that of peremptory challenge, be wished the Bill to pass the Cominitte.., and should then be content to let the measure stand over till next Session. A short conversation followed, in which Mr. H. Ducadionn, Lord ALTIIORPJA, Mr. J. P. ()KANT, Mr. M. A. TATI.OII. Sir (1. CIVIC. Mr. Hots, the Lotto Anrocays of SCOTLAND, Mr. %V. SIITU, and Lord SIN NING participated, after which the House resolved itself into the Committee. The cl were filled up, and the Report was ordered to he received on Monday. On the motion of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHE QUER, it was ordered that the Hones at its rising, should adjourn till Monday. UAL/ Dlr. HUME seein g th e Hon. PAT. Baronet, the Paymaster- General, in his place, wished to put a 9uestion to him respecting a circumstance which came within his know ledge, which had caused much inconvenience. He wished to know when the military pensions of those on the half pay list would be paid, and further to ask why they could not be paid at the same time that the civil pen sions were, instead of being withheld for a month or sit ; weeks, as had of l a t e b een t h e practice? He was at a loss to guess why this delay should take place, which, to his knowledge, occasioned severe inconvenience to some of those who were affected by it. Sir C. LONG, in answer to f-m first question of the Hun. tlent. had to reply that the offhal-pay pensions he expected would be paid on the Ifth next month, and in future, he believed, there would be no difficulty in paying them on the 10th of the month following that in wbicb'they became due. When the Hon. Gent. spoke of its being customary to delay the payment for a month or six weeks, he beg g ed t o say that end, was not the practice. Wind indeed occurred in one instance. From the difficulty of bringing up the accounts, the payments last quarter were deferred till the 23th of April, but this 'ATESMAN. was net usual. When the How. Gentleman said vrls could they not be paid whet the civil pensions were, he heal to remark, that this was impossible. The number of Military Officers on half pay were 10,000; and this stated, it would be seen, that that which the Hon. Gent. contemplated could not take place. The half-pay pen slobs be heti no doubt would be paid on the 10th of next month, and neither the Hon. Gent. nor any other person need doubt the interest he took in their being promptly haid since, ahem be c a m s t o hi s o ffi ce , t h ey were pa id alf yearly, and it wks at his recommendation that the present arrangements had been made fur paying them quarterly. Mr. E. WODEHOUSE presented a Petition from a person of the name of Preston, a manufacturer of Rock Salt at Yarmouth, praying relief.—Ordered to lie on the table. TRR BORDITCHYS. Mr. 110811011 SE presented a Petition from certaii. Inhabitants of Taunton, calling the attention of the House to the unfortunate case of the Bowdiiches. He briefly touched on some of the circumstances of the case, and remarked, • melancholy error seemed to have ran through the whole of it, in consequence of which those tieurtunate persons had been subjected to much nu ' merited punishment. He lamented the hardship of the situ? rase, but at the time was at a loss to see in what way that bony? could interfere. The petition was or • dered to lie OR the table. *Nyco/eras. Sir L FEROCSSON presented a Petition from the Corporation of Hasumermen in the Royal Burgh of I Dwa ßm ne's, attoinat t Mae Bill fur regulating the Scotch bs. A convei.sation arose on the merits of the Bill, in which the LORD A ',SWATS, Mr. Humor, JIr.J. P. GRANT, the Marquess of LONDONDEIRRT, Lord A. HAMILTON.' mad Sir G. CLERK took part, after which the petition was ordered to lie on the table. Mr. MAXWELL presented a Petition from the Clerks of the Peat? in Ireland against the Dread Jury Present meet IM$.-,-Ordered to lie on the table. PITITION FROM MR. BORTRIWICK. Mr. ABEIICROMBY presented a Petition from W. M. Borthwick, with whose name the House were already in some degree acquainted, from the statement which he P (Mr. Abercromby) had made on a former night. This Petition set forth the persecutions to which lie had been , subjected, the meaner in which he bad been imprisoned r and loaded with irons, on a charge of stealing property which was proved to be his own ; but he was not aware that the Peeition contained any fact which he (Mr. Abercromby) had not stated on Tnesday, with the ex ception of his repositories having been broken open, and his papers examined, whilst he was in custody. For the wrongs be bad sustained he had received no coin peusatien. He had received part of his expenses la one instance, but he had bad no compensation for the inja- ries of which be complained. He wished the House to remember by whom these wrongs had been offered. He had received them from the public as he had received them from those who acted in the name of the Elegant' on behalf of the public, and therefore be could apply no where but to that House for redress. Ile did not bring this Petition forward under very favourable circumstances, that House having already decided that they would not inquire into the merits of the ease. Perhaps he should be told that Mr. Ilortliwiek would bare Lis re• medy by proceeding against the informer of the Lord Advocate. But what remedy bad he wanting the means, to bring an action? And who was the informer of the Learned Lord? Why, Mr. Borthwick's bankrupt partner, Alexander, who was now in prison. if he should then be told that Mr. Borthwick had one action good against the Lord Advocate, he should call this ad ding mockery to injustice. If Mr. Borthwick had the right tearing sgAlt maim which ho (Mr. AliegoemsbA denied, Prow Wei a man in his circumstances to oppose himself to the whole power of the Crown Lawyers in Scotland? He had said this much with respect to the individual, but he now called on the house, if they con sidered' themselves the representatives of a free people, to look at the case as one is which the most sacred rights of the subject had been violated, no an individual had been deprived of the greatest of all blowlamp, per sonal liberty. Considering that a great wrong bad been done to the subjects of this country in the person of Mr. Borthwicts, he (Mr. Abercromby) would not desert his cause, till he had again failed to unlace them to go into au inquiry, or till having established the facts (which he felt assured lie could do to the satisfaction of the rest of the world, and hoped, therefore, he could do to the satisfaction of that house) they should say, "we are prepared to declare lie is not entitled to redress." If he proved the facts and obtained no redress, it would be for the friends of the law and constitution to consider what was the condition of Scotland, if a man might be seized as Mr. Borthwick had been, ironed, carried from place to place, guarded with loaded tire-arms, confined for seventy days, and at last liberated without being brought to trial. Mr. Borthwick he (Mr. Abercromby) bad never seen. Of his former life he knew nothing, bus this he knew, that in the communications which he lied with that individual, lie (Mr. Borthwick) appeared most careful that no statement should pass that at all deviated from truth, and he (Mr. A.) was not more anxious to avoid misleading that Louse than Mr. Borth wick had been to avoid misleading him. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY did not at all object to the bringing up of the petition. He rose but to Pray be did not conceive the house to hare come to any decision whatever on the case of Mr. Borthwick. On a former night lie had argued, that respecting that indi vidual there was nothing before that house, and that his case ought not to isflpence the vote they , were then called upon to give. He felt that it was quite open for him to look at that question. If the lion. and Learned Uentkman called for information, he did not say ,it might not be necessary to take some steps on that infor mation. He merely stated this, that it might not be considered the petition was presented under any dia. couraging circumstances. Mr. A BEIICROM BY explained. The LORD ADVOCATE of Scotland bad no °Nee : Lion to the petition being brought up. He bad little i - quiry on the subject. When he was in Scotland he had not expected that a motion, notice of which had been given on the 4th of :461, would include matters which had not occurred till after that period. The warrant under which Mr. Borth wick bad been arrested, —reefed, as all warrants did, that be should be committed to a secure prison. In consequence be was committed to the Jail of Dundee, and had been thence removed at his own request, expressed in writing. When it should be seen on what grounds his Learned Friend and Deputy in Scot- land had acted, be was confident that they would be sa tisfactory to the house. All he now asked %va., that they would +invent' their judgment till the case should be fairly before them. Lord BINNING said, a very near and dear relation of his was concerned in the late proceedings. So far us that individual was concerned, lie bad no wish that the enquiry should be stilled, but quite the contrary. He for our should give a willing vote for the papers which were to he moved fur, and since their production was not to be opposed, he implored the hou s e t o k ee p themselves open to f o r m an 11111/i4114e1l pidgino-nt on the tnerits of the case. Aggravations enough were already abroad. Till the papers were before them, .o enable them to cootie to a fair disposition, lie hoped the house would suspend its judgment, and this was all he asked. Mr. BROUGHAM would repeat the call just made In the Noble Lord—he would repeal it on the part ./i* that side of the house. Since noes an inquiry um, to tak. pl..ce (.01i4:11 ire had always foresaw would be the case) , I let every Member who would have to pesiossuuve meet on theconduet of the Crows Lawyers rat land, keep his wind free from all bias alit ? „,i They (the Crown lawyers of Seatlaiid) were no, their trial, and they hid the right in common . other persons to have their trial conducted limn., before fair and unbiassed judges. But wit 7••• milted this, lie marvelled that the doctrine A% iliv been contended fur eight and forty hour% Lame side of the house—he marvelled that the loottlel that doctrine had not then stench those who we, its advocates. All they (the Opposition) then deiti was inquiry. They had said, he o u t premetii: not condemn, God forbid! without inquiry; but acquit without inquiry. lie had called on tlictii eatertain inquiry, that witnesses might he cal prove the facts. But it had !pleased that house wisdom or in its justice, or under the impression Noble Lord's eloquence, to say, `• so, we will I thing." Theydeclined examining witnesses who prove the facts, or calling for documents which back up the testimony of such witnesses, and dared '• because matters are made out of the gi nature that ever came before the house touching j berry of the subject, and the administration of , we, the House of Commons, will sanction no imp He was delighted that they had found themselves taken on the other side. was also delighted t house had fonnd itself mistaken in the decision ti it bad come, and that inquiry was now admitted necessary. lie must once more protest against OTT which the Noble Lord had taken; in every et spert lie entirely coincided with him. lie had SA he thought a *ember bad no ground fur demandini inquiry unless he produced documents in proof case, or moved that certain documents should upon the table. This was not the constitutiona., tice. A statement of any Member was sufficient t. mand inquiry. Common fame was a fair ground t. impeachment; rumour bad been a Around of hawse!. went, therefore it was absurd to Iliy, that a statement r an Hon. Member, founded upon information obtuir from private sources, would not warrant the house going at once so an inquiry. The Noble Earl said '" documents alone could be evidence, and that pare' dence could not be obtained. Now the effect ut watery evidence would be only to sbew half the the other half bring to he supplied by parole, puzzle a Counsel, without eliciting the truth. way of proceeding in the present case would onl insult to the country and to that house. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY made an vation which we could not bear. Mr. WYNN thought the Honourable and Gentleman had stated the case too broadly, when , that rumour was 'efficient ground fur proceeding quiry. if parole evidence were to he received case, then it must be before a Committee, as that only place where it could be received. Wheu the. meats about to he moved fur were before the house, would then be for them to consider whether ulterior • ceedings would be necessary. Mr. J. P. GRANT expressed his satisfaction • decision of Moister', and stated, that he never , vote with so much personal pain as that upon the i. discussion of this question. He took an opportunity stating this, and Of bearing testimony to the feeling an , . rectitude with which the Lord Advocate had exercised the duties of his office upon all other occasions. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY felt it necessal that both sides should understand each other AA to they were doing, and he must say, that he made change whatever in his opinions upon the qr lie thought upon the former occasion that there sufficient ground in the lion. and Learned Member statement, for the house to proceed to an i nqu i r y u p on ; and, he no 41 the evidence not then elk .. uteri, Shook ewrillrOrdilrderit,iirotitEr tharthelsbourd— possess the means of .deciding spun the charges. did not wish IC be noderstood as pledging Linnets any particular coarse of proceeding upon that iliform, then when Weenie before them. He should not consider himself as pledged to any thing by supporting -" diction of the papers. Lord A. HAMILTONsaid, that what bad fallen the Noble and Learned Lord upon the subject action, wan the most gross in substance of any thi bad ever heard. When the Noble and Learned Lord that be had only obtained a shilling damages, and a cheer among those who surrounded him, he took to suppress the main point that the Jury found a for bins on all the counts. His misfortune was, t went into Court with clean hands; for the stated that it was die goodness, not the badness, character that ought to lessen the damages.—(l? The Noble Lord had done this once to serve a ; which was now past ; and he hoped that for the his own character he 'would not repeat what was . misrepresentation in effect, although he would not was a wilful one. The Petition bring read, Mr. ABERCROMDY said, that do moving Petitiun do lie upon the table, he wished to sat words in enter that the house 'night understand ject. As far as regarded the case of liorthwiek, chiefly related to judicial proceedings, documents a would nit be entlivient, and without parole evidence case could not be established. There were two meet points involved in the question ; the one was the 1. went which Borthwick had received as an instil' and the next was the situation in which the Noble . , stood in respect to his deputies. It was sec eeeee have parole evidencce in order to shew his conitectim with their acts. The only documents to be prude , . upon that point, must be the letters which had between the parties. But these might be of a nature, and lie did not mean to speak disrespeci but only in a constitutional sense, when he sail' they should have no proof of the authenticity r letters. He wished to say one word as to what 11, said of the manlier in which he bad brought ihi ter forward. It was objected that lie ought not I introduced the case of liorthwick in his motion. although he was willing to release the Noble and I ed Lord from the responsibility of acts committed absence, yet his deputies were hound in duty to cm nirate to him whatever took place, and it was ei his duty to require that they did so. 1t ash rep the general tittle in which lie had treated the railej he had charges to prefer he knew of no proper doing so, bat that of stating them clearly and di Of Nr. Hope he knew nothing, for lie believed I never seen that gentleman in his life. Hut the respect 2.sul veneration which he must feel for the of his family precluded all possibility of :any preji motives. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY again atm necessity of . the Louse having u clear understai mom the enliject. When the diwiimente should b fore the house they would probably contain asome . thee information than hail been given by the lion. Learued Meruher, and sonic other Members would perhaps be enabled to say something on the other of the question. It would then be for them to d whether any further inquiry would be rwc , •,s,ary at Ifs thought their was it rear at present upon w Lich iatirusetion was eleeirahle. Rat iliec \sere 1.110 f; no further inquiry ley soimittine that ihi, After a few words. times Lord RINIING 4/1.1 the Ar.vocarc, the petition was uteeerrel to lie opts' table. M %SS %CAE OP Ttle GREEK 1110 ST AGEV. Mr. %V. S.II xr. ine the Nelda 1e.r,1 4.11,0e.ier is place, wag 411N' to 0/Pl.. iutpbrl N a la tL~ IIIMIS 1111 W ;Lbrtid rrlainb to e.:ruite trae•U•• of". • imiesemm .it- • - • now npuo • it 7 1 hr t : ••, ; re 00 that intinesS of were nom • tleistand,4l 441:44. Lo silt do not ,•in but to called to mse its ion of the ill do no. tho *richt . • • and di- le grossest lug . tle li- of pistier. to' iuyuirj.'' 1i elves nais- d the o to . . Ittltti tune view r.• A , • other rr- `4,1%.‘":4 said that - ending an •*of of his Id be laid onal prat- • lent to der round for r iinpescl_. atement of obtained r house in 1 said that parole evi- t of disco- f the case, le, and to • t. Such a • only be an an oleser- . • Learned • ten be said ding to in- red in any sat was the the docu- • . e house, it belies pro- . lion at the rer gave * the former • (inanity of • tiding and I exercised ns- t necessary as to what • made 110 qn-stion. ire was not . • Member's • t air b y enttip- ui"n t - • hilsho4U irges. lie himself to it informa- • • it consider • , g the pro- alien from ire' of his V y thing he Joni stated • and raised took care J a 'verdict that lie the Judge • less, of his -(llear.) a purpose the saltv.l rasa gru..s I not say it g that the say a few ,nd his oh- rick, as it cuts alone idence tho material the treJt- ntlividual, - roble L•ird • y to •onnectiou • produced ad passed a private . .pectfolly, said . that y of suits had hero this mat- • sit to hare on. Mir, nil Legn- ted itlil o commit- s rioal!y• . . i w e a c y t , o i f f ', l rani to - • ,nb er I directly. al he had the deep the Lead rejudieed dated the rstanding iid be be- • • lime fur- don. and thee 0 other side to deride y or mit. 0000 clfg.o 10, he Lulu l i o.ll. lila 7' • . i'r I ty •