The Statesman. — London, England, 1812-04-17 00:00:00

I 41 '1 . : t. " 'it 0 ) L 1, ; i i I DIPERI/L PARLIAMENT. .• HOUSE OF LORDS, Aron. 16. On the second reading of Moon's Divorce Bill, Mr. Carrniv d an other t, e nthrulan attended as Counsel for the Petitioner. Several wimmes were evamined to prove their inorriage, the recovery of damages in au action of crim. con. and the adultery alleged to have been committed by the Lady with Mr. Miller. Ott the renamed •-•osideration of Blachford's Divorce Bill. evidence was adduced to prove the validity of the marriage at Vienea and sib° the adultery alleged to have been committed by th.. :ady with Mr: plgges Latuuchc. Further eonsidetatioa to-morrow. The i.arl of DERBY presented a Petition from the Cotton Manufacturers and others, of Blackburn, for opening the lion India Trish-, which, after being read, was ordered to lie on the tables as was a Petition from the Pro o iietors of Iron Works, ia Shropshire, presented by Lord Bradford. IridrSpirits Warehousing Bill, and the Pilots' Regulatiee - Bill, were read a third time and passed. The Coffee Auction DuPy Bill, the Irish Grain Export Bill, some local and privy a Bills were brought up from the Com room by Mr. LaPhingtoa, Sir James Graham, and other Mem bers. and read a first time. The' Thames Navigation Bill, and the Port of Dublin Bill, were also returned with the amend— • tames, agreed to. • Th e h 3 aheepers' Allowances Bill,.anl the Penitentiary House Bill, palled through Conimittees and were reported. • -TENANTRY IN IRELAND. • * . Earl STANHOPE, adverting to the notice he had given, said he had to call the attention of the House to acts of oppression which in injustice, inhumanity, and impolicy, were almost equal to the miseries of the African Slave Trade. Ile alluded to the oppres sion frequently exercised upon the tenants in pos session in Ireland, hi consequence of the middlemen, of which there were •frequeutly setetat upt?n One estate, ',eels-built - I; a right to diitratn for his rent ppon the tenant in possession, by which the latter lets called.upon to pay considerably more than the .tent he Kad contracted to pay, and was reduced to ehe greatest•dikrdSs in • consequence .;f tiiese•reute being distrained for. -To exemplify what he meanh he would stain sa case of sub-letting which• actualty existed—A, let an estate to B. at a rent of 901. B. d' i ~ily rel... .city t. _.,_ Aug , lluderlet it toll. at 7501. C. imderlet it to D. at 8501. who had gallantly d i sti n gu i s h e d himself at Tarifa, ly be 1 • cause he was a Roman Catholic ? and D. to the tenant in possession at rents amountlng Mr. PARNELL presented a Petition from the Roman Cathni ! to 9401. For the whole of these.rents the tenants in tics of the Queen's , County il l ! Trelandl d wa er y e i d nf o ti l l e be oi r l e t l i i te ev t aron possession were liable to be distrained upon, and cega r in i ti 4 2 . 4 l 47 , r &c. n wi!c a n I .r. tea r as eti o tion from a person Llama have their cattle and their stock taken to satisf Mark Antony Mill ) , in the Isle of Man, praying the House n claims which they had never contracted topay, I le tat h i s .t case 4 t l igi i iNidera ve iti s i tice or t i:g• t ed he tO sho lie u?: table. t n he mice tie could not conceive a more heart-breaking circum- Chairmalny occasion in a hich he should'obscrve an insufficicd stance than apoor , nail of this description deprived n . I , sy I T . o l fa . er m be o rs v rids for rCaonmm account itt . e of all the plain Loci! yprn i of his property, and driven with his family from their , Ac B . lT expo . exported front Ireland, and Imported into Great Brihilq 1 home without any means of subsistence theta being durin4 the last three years. Ordered. no Poor's- rate ! is Ireland) but what he derived bybeg- 1 A , essar lad e from the Lords acquainted the }louse that their i agreed to the Irish Warehouse Ball, and serrial ging from cottage to cottage. He had framed a Bill to I L ordship ' private Bills, without any amendment. remedy this evil, and which hehad prepared with con- The Asa Coach Exemption Bill was then read a second thne. siderable care, but for which however he took no . NAVY OFFICE. credit to himself, the idea having been suggested to Sir FRANCIS BURDETT moved for an Account bin in an exc !lent pamphlet, written by Mr: O'Dedy, 1 of the number of Clerks employed, and the salaries ; Barrister , a gentleman from Ireland. The remedy I paid to each, in the ,Navy Office. He conceived it , he i)ronivie4 was to take away from every derivative to be a very hard case, that persons who had beat Lesie,,, except the immediate lessor of the tenant in twenty or thirty years in laborious situations, should “ -, ...5i0u the remedy of distress against the tenant I yet be entitled to no increase of remuneration. in possession, leaving only to such derivative lessee a , Some of the salaries had beekeven reduced, although 1 remedy for his resit against his sub-lestee, but pro- !many of the places in this O ffi ce had been purchased ; ! Tiding that the in-lediaie lessor of the tenant in pus - land he was informed, that Lord Barham had received ; session should not distrait} fiat: - the amount of rent money for several. He concluded with moving for !' die to the head landlord, unless such rent had been :several other Papers relative to this subject. first paid. By this measure, he contended, that th ' Mr. YORKE opposed the Motion; and observed, head landlord would have his rent better reared, and that whatever the practice had been in Lord Barham's e l the tenant' in pessessi- wbe relieved from greit,oo- time, none such existed at present. 1 pression, whilietthe middle man vs-Auld be lento siehre Sir F. BETRDErI thought a no/ ground was 14d; his remedy for the rent due to him. wherb at he „ fur the Miition, since it appeared that.some enquiry , -ought to be andwed to seek if; frogs his luii.issee was necessary Into Lord Barhani's conduct. As the with whoa Ai had contracted. Having - stated the ' { case stood at present, some persons might be said to outline of his proposed Measure, which vras also ap- . have been little lesi than swindled out of their illeablit to Engtapd, he expressed a wish that the money. addict should be considered with that attention Mr. YORKE exPlained. *bicll its importance.desorved, and moved that the Sir C. POLE was against the motion ; after which Balls , . read a first time, intending to move after- the. House divided—Ayes 15—Noes 62. wards that it be printed. • LICENCE TRADE. Lord RUMS-DALE was aware, and lamented .. The Minot/rage Mr. HERBIRT observed, .that the fait, that several cases of Pi pression had occurred on rising to move-for the production of certain Pa in Ireland under the law of distress. He - had turned, pers connected with the trade now carried on under 1 his ittenliOn a gOod deal to the subject, but there , the Licence System, he had only refrained from were so many difficulties to encounter, that he had . bringing the subject forward at an earlier period, not be-n able to frame. any measure that he could . from a wish that his Right Hon. Friend, the Judge propose as satisfactory.. A considerable part of the of the High Court of Admiralty, should attend in land in Ireland was let upon leases.for lives renewa- , his place on the discussion of a question in which, ble for ever, and the property .derived under these 1 from the office he held,he must feel so deep an interest. leases, was considered in that country as nearly equal , /le now wished that these Papers should be laid be.. to fee simple. He himself knew a Gentleman, who' fore the House previous to that grave decision which grandfather had let an estate of. 13,000 acres in that they might expect soon to be called on to make with way, reserving 800 acres for demesne, and which 800 , respect to the numerous petitions against the Orders acres, now produced more than the amount of the in Council.—[Hear, hear !] He had communicated reserved rents of the 43,000 acres. It was this coin-1 his intention to submit this motion to the Right Ho plication and multiplicity of tenures in Ireland, which 1 nourable Gentleman opposite, who desired to con caused the difficulty in applying a remedy to the evil al- suit with the Judge of the Court of Admiralty luded to by the Noble Ea rl.lVith respect to the rent due before he answered as to the objections which he! to the head landlord, it was not the general practice to might have to make to the motion. After consult- I resort tii distresi, but to ejectment, and to autho- ing with that Right Honourable and Learned Gen rize the resorting to that remedy, there mist be a tle m a n , the Ri g ht- H o no ura bl e Gentle man h a d ac year's rent due; aitcleifier recovering a verdict and . quainted him with the necessity which he felt of op ebtainine possessiam, the party ousted might, withinlposing the production of these Pipers. He should six months, file a bill in equity, and upon payment have imagined, therefore,- that his Hight Honour of the rent and all the costs, it was a matter of I able Friend, the Judge of the Milt Court of Adad- . course to restore use hind. rt was undoubtedly tree, : ratty, would have deemed it neceetairy .. en this occa that with respect to the other eats, distress was a i sion to attend and Wort the Holtman whnt a , e Mutt mare cormon remedy eminwpireburitly, arid' ral grounds it itis,llintte, was averse to pr. "!' e 1 it was a melan fact, shale 'every considerable d ocu m en t s , withotit which it was impossible to *Tel estate, there s=perstiti oar a permanent establish- ! an accurate knowledge 'of 'the frauds, the p vrjuses, 1 went, called the driyer, whose business it was to take and forgeries - with which 'the Licence Trade was ! possession of the cattle and stock of the tenants in ' t a rr i e d on. The speech of the Right Honourablei possession under distraints. The great cause of the the Vice President of the Board of Trade, whets the frequency of distraints, was the poverty of the Order; in Council were lately, under consideration.i tenants who had no capital beforehand, and who had filled him with great anxiety, which he had taking the land at a - rent which only the produce of a shewn perhaps too plainly, in rising at a • very late favourable season could pay, were wholly unable to . hour on that night, when he found it, however, im discharge it if there was as unfavourable season.— possible to procure a bearing ; but he had ever since The tenant in possession, however, took the land felt, and still continued to feel the saute anxiety to , with a knowledge of .the previous contracts for sqb- ' skew and to preve, by ideontrovertifile evidenc,e, how ' letting, and it would frequently operate with the . unfounded were the additions then bazarded by that greatest injustice, if the derivative lessee had only a :Right Honourable Gentleman. [Hcar, hear I .] He remedy for hi s ren t, aga i nst hi s su b-l essee. H e, was fearful on that occasion, and his fear alone had h o wever, did not meals to oppose the Bill in this induced him to intrudel' Oa the pa muce of the Howse, stage 4,14 wishing the subject to meet with the that his silence on hearing such statements and user. fullest Consideratioll. The , Earl of SUFFOLK instanced a case in which ' lions made without contradiction, should have been a landlord ikkelend had abolished the middle . - • T -- interpreted into ah acquiescence hi their correctness men, and their truth . he reason stated by the Chancellor letting his land aeon advanced mist? _ and had by that of the Exchequer for resisting the production of 'the step gained great p,opniarity. '' • , Papers asked for, namely,- that it would be inctriae The Earl of CLANCAItTY thanked the Noble • venient, because, if they were to be granted, it woad Earl (Stanhope) for his attention to the affairs of Ire- be necessary for those on'the otliei side to move 'tQr land, hut doubted very much the practicability l . crap_ Papers explanatory of theneutralizing system, seem plying the propesed remedy , • nor could it be applied ;ell to him to be roost extraordinary , and in tssi this - in the manner suggested without unjustly interfering ! • mon the House must agree- witi hint when it. was with by-gone contracts. Ile was, however, happ y considered what .. the nature of those Papers must be. to state, that the system of under-letting in Ireland wakgradually wearing away, apt must continue tO The neutralizing system wag one for the cilsguitingof property, to prevent persons in this comatrfbous .: - -.-, .• -!.. -- . ,)--: '• .. . • :; rIAN. 1 circumstance to statewhi c h thenever have come dlsgtrieting to whom it really belonged, and, to such been lint le ' r ~,.____warearf' , ibn was it carried , even persons f the ut- bate ' ____...._,............„_....4 Mit'aetuteness were disappointed in their eirdea- would , il ii a , p ro _ a ura to come at the fact. Ile should now proceed had bee n to show •to what extent perjury existed, in the '.sub'ect in n th e s' Council Licence Trude, and that it was necessary for the referred ' continuance of that Trade in this Country.. The licence wee fret Paper be should move for went to .• . prove, Ito import a cargo of butt that oaths were required to be taken on the ; (io n was presented • Continent, before any vessel could be permitted I a nswer was ___ to clear Wt, that she was to proceed to a Port to light, had it iot b e i xertion of an active Gentleman wni even to trace an erasure u 3 n the _ uncil Books. The case to n hid] lie was that of the Vrow Debora, for wl •• Icaptured, and th e named, or any other. port, and was to carry such 1 tion was mad ' on li applied for by Messrs B k "di a . a - er and eon er and cheese. This Pc ) .11. “ on the 40th of January, and t h e refused." The vessel was afterwards 30th of January , an applies. and such property. Every English port, however , , l alt • e to . . ave the Licence granted, with alteration or addition, that the car g o should be an and every species of English property, however , being port ed In a. British vessel; and withthis always excepted. To prove this he should confine the Licence grated. was Mr. W. Itotherey, f himself to one institute, where the Captain having, D octors ' C ommons, had made an affidavit ' e as was required of him, taken this oath on the C on -i n on this , subject , which he stated th e above factsA tinent, made an answer the its the Admiralty Court in 1 ' , and that re was an entry io the Council B ooks, hen/r h e this country, which he should also move for, that ; originally searched them , under date 2Qtli JiM though previous , to his clearing out from the Conti- • theapplication • for 1' Wiry, a wave to the Vrow D b - ' neat, he had sworn that lie was not to proceed to marked as refused but that D . bon was on a subsequent exami. I any English port, yet in reality he was destined for i l nation in April following, the award refused had the port of Leith. This, be presumed, would be I vanished, and the word granted appeared in i sufficient to chew that oaths Were taken on the Con- ; . stead. H e e (Mr. Herbert) was satis fi ed rho ts ! t o Noble ttnent that vessels were net to proceed to this coins- ' Lord at the head i of the Board of Trade, and the try, when in really they were bound for this coun- ! Ri g ht H o no ura bl e G ent l eman opposite (Mr. nose I try under licence., But what be was most anxious to ' had nothing to do with this; but , point out to the ettentispi,of the House was, that were suffered, what a door for corruption an d these perjuries ;ye . recognized . recogni in the Courts o f this o f eve r y kind was hest 'opened. fie had fraud in his pos. cotietry. To dr . holhOnld.pwre for. pa- ses..n'-at correspondence , from the other side et jive 4a es isssi wit vioncinalatortou, ti L fligNmst ~ 4. k *high sheaved what Ike the opinion *Wit own Oet•Jhe ilheetegnitd:every-ameAor N o t . -of the - persons who had in. were_perjured, the vessel wai.restored (matt iiiii — eieUrin - Z, ce on theV - reasury Board of :this county}, and etridenee; such being coUsidered the machinery 'teen ! . I went fere° pfsw' e that the statement of an Honour. eery for carrying on the Licence Trade of this c0m1..; able and iseesutqlp‘Ffiend of his on a late important try. in the case to which he alluded, the vessel come : debate—that the 'pencils who had influem there to this trountrr from Anisterdam; from hence it pro- ' were no hiaterethan hawkers and pedlars was oat ceeded to St. Petersburgh, and from thence returned too highly oolioured: it went far to she; that th e with a cargo to this country. There the Master, ;111,..rebers of that by ad Board were swayed tweet Mate, and rill the crew, for the satisfaction of the some parsons who imi ed ms upon them ; Ind thai, Russian Government, swore that they had proceeded however pure thennelves, they were nee aced Upon direct from Amsterdam to Russia, and accounted for ,by those who were not so. Before he proceeded to fhe length of time that had intervened by a fahrica.ted i this correspondence, however, he begged to notice the statement of tempestlions weather which they had fluctuating policy by whiCh the Board of Trade were encountered, of bad eeentment on an inhospitable ;actuated; varying as it did every day, and thereby island, and of interruptions by the ice. Were it giving rise to the most mischievous speculations. The not that he understood from the Right Hon. Gentle- correspondence to which he referred proved the et. man (Mr. Perceval) that the papers he wished would.; istence of a trade in buying up licences which had ex not be granted to him, he should have moved for the i pired, and fabricating excuses to the Board of Trade whole of this double fabricated history ; and should .to induce them to renew them. The Hon. Gentle have shewn from the answer of the Captain in the man proceeded to go through a correspondence from Court of Admiralty here, that• during the time he certain persons in Bourdeaux to an Agent in this was struggling in the course of his voyage through country. .In one letter the foreign correspondent the ice, as sworn to in his affidavit in Russia, he was directs his Agent to give 3000 francs for an ex actually in this country. He should not read the i pired licence, and to send it to him, that a story whole of these papers, which were of considerable may be fabricated, or himself to fabricate a store sech length, but simply stated these as their contents.— as might be calculated to induce the Boned of frsde When this case was argued before the Court of Ad- to renew it. In another letter a similar measure :: miralty, a junior Counsel, who, in the simplicity of recommended, and it is stated that a traveller sit: , his soul, thought that a perjured' document could , sent to meet the agent in England, so that the rietter not be received in an English Court of Law, was may be more cleverly concerted. It was also stati.:‘, treated with contempt for his ignorance, and was the lion. Gentleman said to be in the knowledge of almost hooted at by his more experienced bre. ; this correspondent, as exreesed in his letters that thren, for objecting to a document which was ne- i another person had already successfully practis..,. t . cessary for carrying on the trade of this country. 'iniquitous fabrication.' In other letters this cc..; This doctrine was assented to by the Court, and theispowdent informs his sent, that it he could get tr , objection was instantly over-ruled. He asked, was riceaces, one for the isle of Fiance, and another he not founded in justice; in saying that this war a for.gnadaloers* he might give for tie .ormer 5001. system so destructive to morality and to the well. and for the latter 7001. ; and throe Sums he , s after. being of the country, that it ought not at least to ! wards authorised to increase to 2000 guineas. 'These receive the favour and protection of the Court of , sums, the Hon. Gentleman o' served, were offered, Admiralty of - this country ? There was another , not as ii Licences were an article wh;ch could bst paper which he would have moved for, namely, a , dealt in, but actually as briber; and the same cor- Copy of Instructions how to act in case of a vessel's respondent seemed to think that by offering addi. being detained, as exhibiting a most disgusting Pic- tional bribes he could get the conditions of Licences ture of the frauds which the country was reduced to changed. Gentlemen might smile, supposing that he practise, in order to be enabled to carry on this trade imagined that the Board of Trade had been bribed. — by licences. It would not be necessary for him to I . That was not an idea which 'had ever entered his fatigue the House by an enumeration of the different mind; but this he might be allowed to say, that the false, fabricated, and Inconsistent documents which Board might have been necessitated to take advice these instructions recommended every Captain to be from persons who had been bribed. Whether the provided with, so as to suit every emergency. It' Licences so wished to be purcluuted bad or had not been. was sufficient to say, that perjury- was universally obtained, he (Mr. Herbert) had no knowledge. But practised throughout the whole system; and that it this, at least, did appear that them tgleted a belief in was even admitted and tolerated in our Courts of the ports of France that they Might be obtained Admiralty. That this was the case, be had already through bribery ; a belief which .It was hardly pro explained in the instance of the vessel from Amster- bable should have existed, unless It had been founded dam, to which he had already alluded. For, if he on experience. After some further remarks the Hon. could show, which he pledged himself to do, if the ! Member concluded by moving the following Heso papers were grunted to him, that a single vessel., lution : .. had been liberated where it was evident all the do.; I " 'Mat the House sees with reve r e* gstem of fraud and cuments were grounded on perjury, than there could,' perjury recognized and protected by the High Court of Admi. be no doubt what the principle was, and that it i rally, as justifiable and necessary tinder the present tire and ::: ought to be looked.at with horror and detestation._ ! emit t ers . of t Commerce the hh o h of ibe r Co db 7try ; t the dhee 147:example it Ile could not say that, to his conception of the that -' 1 ~ - r e 2 o Pir l i s n:i ii t to o w the morals te" of th stem e s Nal l ion; dangerous pra to the funda ter, the Court of Admiralty had done its duty. Wa " i niemei • • principles of evidence, and encouraging a disregard of a person sitting. in judgment to be told that it w ar, truth In Courts of Justice, where truth only ought to be admitted; necessary to colour and protect property by fraud ' as well as the unprincipled nutoopoirof conducting trade w ith and perjury; to listen to that idea, because be was an enemy by means of Licences, from which Neutral li..tions informed, as a reason for his doing so, that the per- are excluded, on a plea of necessity, Subversive of the most so jury was committed, not for the purpose of deceiving cred principles of the:taws of estioat.” this country, but for the purpose of deceiving our Mr. astonishment at the ROSE expressed his utter as enemies? lie could not -listens-listensto such reasoning.—•-motion jest read, calling upon the:House to p ass the .4 liq isltstrAillitutio...,late his. idektilirstgliii4l7 the .fitronekt. cenuKA Apaik-Alle Coup 4 . 4 1.thlligal t h • 10 rules or . justice.. He,,coakl • not swerve from his without the slightest testimony being adduced re. duty; but was, tuoind v to.ipelieve that a person who prove that it was well foulded._ He went ou to ts 0 4 - ould not scrutile to peejure.himself, or to take a' ply to Mr. Herbert upon the eeriety of poie re t s. false osithibie the purpose of deceiving our enemies, which he had adverted, contenaiog that the elp .ec would.hive equalte little' scruple in deceiving - es.— Sion he employed in a former debate on this sub j ec t Wherowere the Hittite' lo • such a system, he asked, had been misunderstood. As statement_ _ ce : ,. to he drawn? Where was it to stop? He did amounted to this—that under the . system o f I i ' note know if war a question had ever come be- ces less perjury existed than anterior to its the6stem establish fore any of our Courts .of common law. If merit. Be was firmly perraded.th If t a h t e conseeLace it ever did, he sincerely hoped they would fol- now adopted were abandon , . Gr eg ~ low a different Copse, and would not give credit would be the extinction of the. commerce of to perjured men and to perjured documents. The . Britain, ... next article to which he begged to call the attention ' • 'MG. 11. THORNTON was surprised that thi been confined to the of the House, wai the abuses resulting from this motion'of Mr. Herbert had not . lie might, perhaps, system, and from this Trade. An Hoe, Friend of , production of Papers, on whic h.. „ ~ oine future vote of censure. ti e'. his, when this subject was formerly before the have fouided . s did . that it exist, and thought I lousecalled their attention to the fact of two Li- . mitted _that f rauds to ,enquiry ehould b . .: iustitutel senses hiring beeei granted for brandy, at a time . Would befit !hat . an When such Licences were not generally granted, and ; ascertain their origin. • read when two such Licences would have been well worth Mr: PONSONBY agreed That the Ipso] ution it sod , to any man, as it was stated, the sum o f 15,0001. } f rom the Chair was ill-limed-eod imp rudet The excuse then made was, that this was a solitary I that, notwithstanding the declared opposition that wes instance, and,. as such. was not of much importences- to be given, it would have been better simply to base He felt the full weight of fie The Papers he should have moved for on this subject; moved for the pa p e rs. as convinced that ne he coaceirod, might have been granted, notwithstand- remark of Mr. Thornton, and w f P. Honourable I profit which we could de ri ve from rsud,cculd comp. c. ing the objection stated by the Rig 1 inju ry that would arise from the debtru , Gentleman (Percevat)to the production of the other sate for t he As to the proceediegl • ' Papers, for the Papers On this subject were not at tion of the pub lic mo rals. ''`d t° give all met by the nen te tt lizbeee system. Wirat he begged, the Court of Admiralty, he was not-prepa red iii the fi rst place, particularly to allude to was, the an y p ositive o p inion, _ without nisch previous eye °of, ante - dating te dating of Licences. ' On this head he had , a . and therefore moved as an Amendment, " Th a t this Tut 4 . do so, it being the inte'rest of the lell country to pot an end to it wherever it .14 to do so. Lord HOLLAND expressed a wish that fite)Nel* ject should be attentively considered, with the via* of ascertaining what remedy could be apkiied. ‘ts en' evil. * hielt wa s en tat heucts . edmiteed. c ould not,,however, oevieelee kroli. the Ifeble • who had spoke last could Hoo t- eirge the, argunient unjustly interfering with by ikons contracts, Marti fuse any weight to that argument with reference to the Bill of his Noble Friend linif Session (the gar:l:- note Bill), which it was •Inest forcibly urged Tong operate most u'ujustly with respect to by-gone con tracts. The Fetrl of CLANCARTY, in explination, maintained that he had •supported the Bill alluded to by the Noble Lord, bu the ground of preventing the tenant from being ground to the dust by being called upon to pay more than he ought to be compelled to pay, under the equity of his contract. The LORD CHANCELLOR observed upon the great importance of the subject, and the difficulties which attended it, and remarked that the Bill; when it came to be discussed, must be discussed with a view to a much greater variety of considerations than had been yet alluded to. • 'Phe Bill %as read a first time, and ordered to be printed. INSOLyF,NT DEBTORS. The Insolvent Drib_tore BillWilte-read a sncomeire - and committed' foi 111obt. !.3 Adjourned• till to‘tao.l Octst .fair Mr. SHAW presented a Petition front the. Cornetist* Dublin against the claims of the Roman of - Ireland. Sir J. NEWPORT asked what clai:Abe Petitiosers could supposed to have on the attention of the House, after haviF cently refused the freedom of their city to Major O'Donn mere y I` i~ ` 1 k .~ !