The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1821-03-01 00:00:00

wri Cheaseery,t4Fat emetiaa Ole Potter of yattaMaya...lllle barl sopped the pro. 2senlirrt Wt Cowl fat jit respect so doe dittsilY a 'hair Thee erne o Polities preseahrd by we of the ratio to that Wow, that she question ark* be derided by a Ceasurittee all'irirOgrees. He aseatiealdl Ibis fee the rupee et ealberlignar illsrdeblpe ialteetias In it, an it was *OM lot I. beekelded, aeit catty U. it ilbeted the el At related I* she slitgaitiee sad raritie 0 s thesr, ,lieribeskt °WO for an i =a s reamit.ill ; h o upia p in ArlimaratEL '-t:_/ •tteir.i.labr.sai.; ./ Issauncv IN. lion froi the t►e Catholic the Ckry of dame of Exeter...—Ordered t. Me. R. FITZGIBBON permuted • ietiticto from the Cs- Molies of the County of the City of Limerick. praying to be admitted to the fall participation of constitutional rights. Mr. SPRING RICE supported the Petah'''. it was no lustier a question of etpedieacy, if hither! esperlimey could ever he separated front I b e right, but priestlier. He, for one, was ready to agree to the appointment of a Committee, such as be understood WAS now about In he moved far, be. cause be thought that the 'delimitate of she Claims of the Catholics would establish on the Mutest basis the security of the Prutestaut interest. The Petition was ordered M be printed. Mr. WILDMAN pretested a Petition from the Borough of Cerkberter, anvil the Catholic Claiess.—Orderid to be rioted. Lord R. MANNERS pretreated • similar Petition from certain Fretieilders of the Comely of Leicester. Mr. CA LCRA PT begged to ask the Noble Lord, ',brayer this Petition had beer adopted at any public meeting, and how such meeting had been totavened Lord IL MANNERS mid, be did mot know whether it had been agreed tattoo at any electing. It had been for warded to him before she present year. Mr. CALCRA FT said, Him he understood the Noble Lord to say that he did not know whether any site. sing had or hail sot been held fur the pavpa.e of sewing to the Petitioa, but that it bail bees deltvereil to she Noble Lord lase year, though he only now brought it foreard.—(Loryta. ter. cad Ilear, kenr.) Ordered to be printed. Mr. NOLAN presented a similar Petition fruni the Town of Nui4iiighasn. Sir E. HARVEY presented a similar Petition from the Clergy of the Archdeuemsey of Colchester. Sic JAMES MACKINTOSH said, he observed these Pe titioners prayed that *ow of the ',curtsies elßalallialreri at the eleelopue Revolution asight he removed. He was oat aware of aim intention to propose the removal of any of she seen. 'sties of she Revolution of HAS. Ile tattered he ettubl un dertske to se, that his Right Ihromirable F. Mod (Mr. Plun kett), would at re, commit to she removal of nay of the se rarities obtained by that event; but he farther believed, that, like V former Right II ...... arable Friuli., of his, be did Hat colifuto:r: the lir volution of 16115, with all that was dorm at that period, most particularly isi Is rlantl.—( Ilene, Lear) —lie was glad to 6..61 asnoug Site Calh.lics a growing COSl flikace in Ma 'intl.'s) and jnaliee of Parliament, and he trusted that the rcailli of this oriehi's tom ovoid rename all necessity fir soy forth., Petitions ors the sulsjem; but should it fail, be hope II t h e Catholics would persevere in ibeir effort., mid be was emitidesit the day lOU out far armed ales Its. it claims most be conceded. - - Ordered to be priwatol. sir THOMAS B. LETHBRIDGE prruealed • Tetiliau /role the wars of Rectum, in Sneterveeirlsir., •13 .1,101 •"Y further tont . ..onion In the Catholics. Thev relied on the tent -411 of Piolianrent tint to grant any farther c....creeiros, ' o "ltent come rffretull security f..r the P.otretant E•ta bliehistent ; bat ilny tkutitrei the po.oil.ilily 0 1. dc"i"Z any I " , •%tore h ffor.l ruitief..rtnle rein( In OW Ca. li " . tir• and ilt.• .71111 e tome prat itle 6.1 the eeetorily of the kelition. Ile now.' tur.l.4llv coitruirril in the 1 : 1 14/6 :n ali " l'elitiout re ; and if it were itte wit ration of be Nleini•er fur the liaiver.ity of 1).41.1ita to aware fur a conninit.e, with a vim to the propped of any 1 . 1. 114'11km. he enis4l not Intl think it a mere tlettn.ion, for ha Lace nut how any 101 :..rare that would satiety a 'gad Ca cuuld be coo..lSil lit With the PlllBll7 of Ibe I:stabkhell wrre the rewins which hid mcliuctl Item far so neon} II! ht. hid b"11 i" to meet tis isdigemserod sock Prtitious Wog presented to it. pie Hororr•bla Member proceeded to observe, that if allegaduals d t►e Petitioners bad bees only illiberal, I aboard, and woetwirtiso, be would have posed them tonne ' 'Wed; hot there were irsesey of these which were grossly false ; nod eistressgh he eras is charity disposed to give them • large credit fee iguoraece, be mold out Wove that they were not aware of their falsehood. They asserted that Ca• 1160111 A admitted of guestsl reservation; sow he would put it to the Moose whether the Peiltiosers world be igaurant of the repeated disellaiuseirs of the Catholics of soy such tenets. The Hoc Member was proceeding to rder to docuesesetary revidesee on this point, wire The lIPS4ILER reminded him that it wee not strictly is order to commeat spoil • former Petition', wises amber Petitior was Were the House. - Anson.' /nether ohoervat inure from Sir T. S. Lethbridge, Mr. Warm, Mr. *wham, sad Mr. Legh Keck the regime was reedimad ordered to be petaled. Oa the modem of Mr. CA LCRA FT, the seder for !shin into coesiderathot the Petitio• against the return few Aid- Wereagt, ou the ISt% Mardi, was discharged. she H. PARN ELL post poised, till Friday west, his motion roppetin the knsiug of Tithes is *related. ENGLISH ROMAN CATHOLICS. Lord NUOSIIT rum IM isterent a Petition from r numerous body of English Catholics. The lion was signed by 8,000 persons of the Catholic Church. Among the aignatui those of seven Peers, foustren Baronet., at of their Bishops, besides those 'of 'many clergy end gritti ; and if le WOW wrisk tsolit__litiostitP iliklove ottalossbide ' wbfeeM prayed' 'Woe Petitioners, those Mints were not founded vein expectation of any material change likely . have taken place in the opinions of the House, but on the increased and increasing claims of the Peti tioners to consideration, awl to the tone and tenor of the whole Petition. The oath of supremacy, the House are aware, has hitherto been one great difficulty in the rani of admitting the Roman Cnthulics to a pirtienation of the privileges of Blitivh subjects. The Petitioners state, that they are accused of giving to a foreign Poteo tate part of that allegiance which is due to their Sovereign. They have repeatedly denied the charge—they agent dray it. They acknowledge to their Sovereign the fullest and most trobounded allegiance. In him alone they recognise the power of the civil sword within the realm. They acknow ledge no foreign Po citrate to have the least power within the realm, civil, spiritual, or ecclesiastical. Hear, hear.)—There only now remains this question then. Is it for religious tenets or politi cal diwbihties the Catholics are excluded ? If the House reject the ;outer t.f the Petition, they must be prepared to assert this, that no man is wor thy of the privileges of ciiizen who Mies,. in the invocation of saints, its the spiritual power of the Pope, or the real pr.sence, and that these opinions are of such a dai'grrnua tendeocy, that it is neces sary to guard agaima them, by excluding one-fourth of the moral strength of the nation. You hare wet , sh e Roman Catholics firmly mid fondly at tached to their religion, how firmly surd fondly their sufferings and persecutions for centuries can best attest. They ask you to strengthen your own religion, mid make it the instrument of their CHUM. eipstion, and your own securny.—( Herm, hear.) — The Noble Lord then referred to the monstrous assertions of the Winnows °ate*, winch on all hands are admitted should he swept away; yet notssithstandistg the deltheiations of the Council of Carnet ;nee, and notwitlistassiling the testimony of every nation to Europe, in which Protestunts acid Catholics are together tinder the same Clo ver 1111 l eist, still do these odious statures remain on our books.—) Cries of Hear, hear, hear.) — The oaths alpinist tratisubstaistiation be should say were iinjost and calumnious; for it only concern ed snatteis of belief, and could out, thelefore, he • fair subject of politic.il exclusion. With respect to the oath of supremacy, he was authorised to soy, that, as far us it contains any moral duty, they were ready to comply : further than that they would not go—further than that they had no right to go,— He had some authorities of itreat weight to pro duce to the House on the subject. The first is the unthority of a staunch advocate of civil liberty, noel also the advocate of Protestardisin against Pops ov—he meant Bishop Handley. He said he could not justify the exclusion of Papists from curd offices, except in the ease of open and avowed hostility to die civil Government established in the realm. Mr. Justice Blackstone was more explicit on the subject. He said, that when the power of the Pope giew weak in every country in Europe, then would be the time to remove these restiictions.— Hear, hear.) —The third was Archdeacon Paley. He said, it should be remembered that the con- I Inuit's) between Popery and Jacobinisin was the of th. HL and the Petres, been depiirod (Hear, hear.)—He would conclude with a passage from the Petition, for on language could be more forcible. It was taken from the preamble of the 19th of George 111. " That British subjects of ull 41ellantiliaimbila were entitled to the advantages of a five Constitution." Grant them but this, and you give happiness to Ire land, and pence :Ad prosperity to England. — (Load cheers.) Lord GLENOICHT, in seconding the Petition, would lint detain the House u the orestion was about to b e brought befogs their notice i 6 w able a manner. lie should mend, tray, that if* were a hardship that these disabilitiei should exi,t in Ireleud the Catholics of Englaud cultured still greater nitrations. The Petition was then read. Lord NUOENT observed, that there were only now remaining four of the ancient baronies occu pied by those Barons who gained Mogan Charts for England, and the representeteres d i gitise Barous had signed tine Petition,—(llese, kssit,. hear.) Ordered ' lie on the table. reading. which. al his arrest said, he was taken before a military tribunal of ufficeni, and ►tied by th..se laws *lnch were laid down in a prochtmatio,► found on his per son, and sente►►ced by them to be shot. There was no accredited agent of the British Govern ment l►reseut at the execution. Sir ROBERT WILSON said, that the explanation of the Noble Lord was satisfactory as far as it went, but did not go far enough. Tha letter stated re ferred to a Council of War at Naples, but his ob servation related to a preview; Council, and the let ter of Sir William A'Court referred to the previous Council of War. Lord CASTLEREAGH observed, that he thouFht the letter of Sir William A'Court quite sat►stac torP, and he could assure the Hon. and gallsisit Off►►er that he did not think the suspicion had a c.►lour of foundation. IRISH CATHOLIC PETITIONS. Mr. PLuNiirrrose to present a Petition from a Very considerable body of his Majesty's Roams Catholic subjects in Ireland. The ►ignatures to the Petition amounted to souse thousands. Front the means which he hull of acquiring accurate in formation on the subject, he was enabled to assure the House that the Petition was a fair representa tion of the opinions of the Roman Catholics of Ire. Isnd , and, coupled with the Petition which had been presented on behalf of the same class of English sub jects, might be taken as an equally fair representa tion of the opinions of his Majesty's Roman Cut he lic subjects in every part of the empire. A similar Petition had been presented to the Mouse its the year before lust. It was unnece 0000 yto remind the [louse that the Petition prev i ewed by she late Mr. Gr.ttan had been brought forward with all the authority of wisdom and resistless power of elo. quessce which. lent distinguished dist great and much-hunented Inatt. It was out his design to take up the time of the (louse by expressing the feel tugs of his heart upon his decease, nor to mingle the public sorrow which followed him to his grave with those observations which he wes shout to submit to the I-louse. His eulogium had Levu already pronounced in that House by lips whose eloquent expression he would not pretend to cope with, end due honour had beets rendered to hisdepurtrd excellence. It was slot for hi►n to disturb the solemnity of his obsequies. His death, like his life, was a bond of connexion be tween the two countries. He (Mr. Thinker') was desirous not to weaken the force of this eulogium, which hail been given him by the expression of his own feeble praise and unavailing sorrow. The sub ject comprises! in the Petition was one which had lain nearest his heart—he had felt it most earnestly— it lied taken entire possession of hiss mind, and kept at► apparent interest in Isis thoughts to the end of his time. 1n the last scene of Isis life he had proved liis willingness to lay down his existence its the defence of the right. sod libertiesof his country. But deeply as he had felt interested in the defence of those rights and liberties, and muds as he had inclined to believe that among thetas was comprised a relief from the disabilities described by the Petition• err, he had never entertained that opinion without ; Mr. PLUNILIITT 1111011 it row. Having discharged the duty. which hod been put upon hiss, and which conferred on him Inch honour, us the presenta tion of a Petition from so considerable and respect able a body as the Irish Roman Catholics must be allowed to confer on ally Member of that Hume, he had now to discharge another duty, by leading the House to a consideration of 'loose laws and re gulations which peculiarly affected Roman Catlss lrc subjects. Ile cleaned to be sinderstoodaa bring. log the measure forward on behalf of the Legisla ture of the conutry, uud on behalf of the Protest ant population generally, as leas than la oefereneo: to affording relirf to his Majesty's Catholic 'subjects. , His purpose wos that of calling the attention of the Howie to the relative situation of the Catholic body's..., situation which on one side was con sidered as justifying the severest measures, while ors the other were heard assertions of injustice sad ',presidia. which if persevered le" vest likely to end degradingly the and • owl very importance. though ject which ought by no means to be overlooked.— If it were supposed• that he intended to intro. duce the measure as a palliative, to quiet existing troubles, or to reduce existing disorders, discori teuts, or ill-will, his measure would be undervalued. And as to fact, as to OUT distraction or troublesome discontents, the Irish Roman Catholics had nobly disentitled themselves to any imputation of turbu lence or disaffection. Determined as they were never to abandon their claims to justice or the wisdom of Parliament. they were also resolved pa tiently to await the decision of that wisdom, well knowing that on no other principle could they rely for the attainment of that justice. That the Irish Catholics wen. anxious for a participation of all the rights and privileges of the coustitutiou he would he ashamed to deny ; that there might be some feel jog of discontent at delay, some sickness of opinion, caused by hope too long deferred. it was nut his iii trillion to conceal. That any measure which he might have the honour to propose to the House would, when adopted, immediately allay all previ. our ferment and settle all present discruitent, it was far from his intention to aver ; neither his nor any other measure which could by possibility be devised, could at once settle opinions long agitated, or in stautly assuage habitual discontent. No such mea sure could be expected to operate as a charm. It were as reasonable to suppose that because the tem pest had subsided, the waves ought or would imme diately cease to roll. But of one thing the House must feel sure, that by doing justice they were pre paring the way for the establishment of lasting ,race. Their duty was simply in consider if in justice had beeo done, and if so, to statue for that injustice—if grievances were partially and oppres sively felt, and if so, to remove them--if injunous distinctioer had by accident or other circumstances been introduced innotig the subjects of the empire, and if so, to obviate them. If they found upon full germination that injurious distinct had crept in which were never intended—if they found every class oppressed by partial injustice, which, weighing unnecessarily upou the minds of the sof ferers,sunk into their hearts and imbittered their re flections, their duty would be to apply such reme dies as the State and Constitution approved to the evil. But if they found that the sufferers made up a very cui.siderable portion of the people in one great branch of the empire, the tie. cessity or promptitude in the application of that remedy would be so much the greater. Before he proceeded to the main discussion to which he would invoke the attention of the House, he wished to reply to an observation which had been frequently offered in opposition to measures such u that which he had to propose. It had been ob jected to plans of eniuncipuii 111 l , that all the mea sures for that purpose were imperfect.-thnt those who had called mile attention of tile (louse to such subjects, were slot agreed union themselves as to the exact measure which ought to be adopted— that the plan would in all probability be incousist ent with the attainment of the object sought, as well as dangerous to the conatitutional interests ; and that as there were many offices from which Ca- count of the mode la 'bias it eat adesseed, actett( unfelt ly. To such persons he used say, if we are wrong is the principle, prove to as that we see wrong; bet if you feel dist we are not wrong in the Pripet*, what right can you here to meet us with ob jectifies ea to the detail of the measure ? If -you think the detail objectionable, cense and as• not us is adjusting it ; but do not oppose a ( rind tilde openly avowed, end one which you wil l oot undertake to cootrovert by orgistelts, so resem bling the frond and rleatsgeoss of an nworlifig ene my. We come forwerd with no theoretic specula tioa—we offer no outried stuns, tie aurouched peesciple—we cell spew you foe the restoration t,f rights provided for as by the Cowertssioo itself. We smog numerous body of bis Majesty's loy.l , asking fir riehtsead liberties which were for us by the blood of our anceptors. t the question we propose to you fairly, and do not oppose it on pretensions foooded in the detail of a measure, to the principle of which you are lIIIIIMIC fairly to object. What he - tbnut was the - were any person who entertamed such a wish. he (Mr Plunkett) must decline all discussion or argument with him. He himself had confi dence in it that there might be such a pion ; and that confidence had been materially helped and increased by the conduct of a majoiity of that House, so persuaded of the probability of adjost.. iog the claims, that they had resolved to appoint a Committee to inquire into the laws affecting I{3 man Catholics. A measure for their relief had b , :en in the contemplation of the Committee, and at t h at period, MI, had it not been fur the gross netts. eretion of some of the members of the Catholic body, it would have been carried into effect. At that period the country was reeling to its centre, being shaken by a tempest, the rudest that ever a nation weathered. He could not believe that any of Blade Gentlemen who had then given a vote in favour of Roman Catholics would withhold it Wow. It could not be forgotten by any greteitil mind, that among the proud and distingui,beil services which had brought the conflict to * con. elusion. none were more divtiuguished than those rendered by Roman Catholics. They had fought the battles of the country. and shed their blood en prodigally in defence of her liberties. that they had shewis themselves well deserving to enjoy thine lebertii.o. He was convinced that there could be no hostility in any mind to a closer union with Catholic subjects. All the adverse opinions might he fairly styled prejudices ; and in using the terns prejudice, he meant nothing like affront to the feel. tugs of those who opposed the claims. If there were prejudices, they originated in noble feelings which had formerly grown out of greet and anxious stiugs gles which the country trail suffered in defence of civil liberty. If these prejudices. derived so cre ditably from a jealousy on behalf of civil I;hertv, did exist, they could only be slit eitudly reached by the assault of reason; and. if properly attacked, would certainly be removed. But autoag the .Ip . posers of the measure there must be a great anxiety to adopt it, were it net for some supposed sense of public duty which regraded their concurrence.— It was impossible to doubt that the necessity of complying with the claims was a growing ferlieg both of the House and the cousitiy ; therefore he was not likely to be opposed by any feeling of opposition but that which arose from a very reason aide jealousy as to the security of the constitution and the existing establishment. lie would proceed to lay the ground/of his motion before the House. The question resolved itself into three topics of CAttßi- , deration—llse religious, the constitutional. and the political. In discussing these subjects he feared that lie would have to draw largely on their patience and attention. The object was not tire of unknown to any of the Member.; but some of them had never heard it discussed within the walls of Parlia ment. Ills treatment of the subject must her. re ference, therefore, to the necessity of explanatioa with respect to that portion of tlw (louse, and therefore lie &well that he must trespass out their time beyond those limits ulnae the well-known character of the motion might seem to affix. First then came the rel%lous • . . . • • ~,.. a.. . . i . i ( . • . .' .. •' • ' • • . .. - • . . . 1 . ... . . • • • -f' . ' ‘; ' .. 7 . ')" , • • - , . . o v x . :* ~... :- ) ...,,- ~ • , -_ - t_ .. ." ‘ •-• ,-' * 2. / . _.. . . • .'.a.p , * of ••• ••• io ' '44" ClP :4 , gr '" i rek*Lhe." t, , 14b. , • r4r 4. . . 1 7 ,IligyetIV 4 180110 . 1ii: is /rail , . • ~.. - 4 4 • lii i :5 .1 . 1 . $ I t . ' I .: 4.6 74 V 1 / 1 10 0 " SI M *4 ' ' . . 0 ; 1111 , sii4 5 $ ".... , I ... irt ~3iithlotisa Ist rtilierr h; -.- tt4et• •,- . , r;ifs. - /m 1 , ! I $ .. , - Ile . sr . t•satrt slyer Oa sii"ba 4:tt...stOotwftu, ,- ;10;0 4 10 9 's •:&i./0 •.,,, • , . 4 i 14-1.1•1 ' tof se.* I ~t;itk 147 .1. • ..irbil• trr il t_lo,o '..,... A * .7,•: . -:1 , 5 kt 4 - *eguiat 0 .... t ~ .-- -. :•‘„. . 4 .1 4 • . I . *.ais • - i.... re • ._ . ~. pit . , ~: % . ' , - , litetil Ilhwer WC .•ad • . 43 . 1 . ..,.. ntrati,l ri f t R, sisent,,y44oq vile Jam lt..ma he .• .e . .-....iie - • sir ! e. i: t • . 'At' • "...i.eit nsen,it.iA) . , , -: lar t• . l l mil l e. i i c •-, ) mile 4 '. WI ••11 . .neupit4 '11'41! 1:t ' c'S 'sit '':'+Siktf.:o l .` 1 • 3 - ,-o e •,:' '''''' ' ' • 1-• , •;f •:1 - turd Jtsss irv.irsfl ' . -- . • .-, • ~• . i 5.,• I ' , eta set 41 s - et 4 . ~, ••. r- ' '141 11 ! • . _ . 1 .. . . - . . ...... , • - - - - - ---- - .. -- . -----. ---. • --i''' • -, - ------ . • . - •w, r . ''.4-../.409 . tfl 's LONDON, THU '• • . MARCH 1, 18511. • e lse is 1 .v • v ott, I . , ... .L. - .. r • • Tiernan' 5690. • . • it. • .r. • , t: , .., 1 - Pate, , . ~ ...4,..... . • • . • . •k ..1 • , -1, iiIIIPARIAL P4MLIAMSNT. . .` beery ass to oppose the claims of his Catholic ' sole • jostifleatiola i, . ; hence they. t ip , : those qualificetigiesp which the constitubsu asr.__aaAall sof .tholi_es seem eggisig*, , ,'. .• . :; ..,.. ~.,,_••••,, ... .. I s . . fellemmbjeets , continue sae I ''' some visible demised. He bad always considered it a meat millerist feetly Irwin • '44 111 . 11, ....-.........1.1....-.-•-. ' . • . Mr. GREHVELL said as ,he had been mearly twenty . , . reedered them , • '' — 4 Heftr, hear 1-0 0 . wart of the on' to determine what meutitiee the to which they WO* - ~ ir. yi* . . 110111161144 Lamy, Winonstsoaw l 1111111111fi. : ran a Hoehn , of that Homer, sod had invariably sop- „. . . . yi. j .g • . .., hilX , . , Viotti— . , , . . , , _ 41 % I r '"' '• ' ' ed by bls vote the appals:snots, of tbe Catholics fur autnonttes then, with the lii•tory a coustitution or time Protestaut people might requiem wens of which it `mai •hs - ti ' Tbeirijemehipe we ~,i t ee ( kw,* ea, imp kipeedst. •••-t-i dies bet hod am lad am oeporimmity of &bards, his Cendnct of thi 11 , I ' , I , holies theaspelves, be fo r the integrity of existing institution* its earansa the re—sa d finally. that thourielow . propired seder; sake disesteems which hod take. place se e s eteuded they w wrmteis, Appellant ; eonsterii==,-u,,,,97 to tz , privileges. , conceding time Catholic claims. He tea s . eUre he were least of all agreed as to the socseitles which , .be 4141001 04 ibis accuelom publicly so declare Th ey pro f e i e t hil •••Pur ' a 1 4 ' nt disvinlable fame. the ream which attenda on virtuous setilleat ought to be deimateded or Ores for the protection TIM arts so Appeal from ilie•• sa d , ao far home amderetionsg the Cesulitti.. .• • is.., " i i they be estemksl it was cheering to him while lie was on earth., But of the existing etnabliahatent. He de filed this unman. Sristlenfl. lr e l l '' h° " w° f " iti..7g lis . ad fthe • " V ance ' an d 4la t ' was cos eat, rum most allentsve exam aa. „„, r The Alftrocf•Gellvosi wee hoard in ..rw•+ . ll'l • ittt •°- • lisealfShe *abject, that a compliance w ith sh e p ra i ri e a on • bed of Politics . , r—(Hetep ailig.l if It. had that weekliess of great abode, 1)0 one foil node of meeting the subject as uncenclid, onalait- hrtigesemt pootpemod. ~.;i in v .• Wm °Whalley would prove the greatest support to she Co.- Do not tell the :., .. 'ullsolies, tliiii you mote strongly than tutu detertatitid of thst bellow ly e end unjust. The querion was, if the subject .. caws& G 0 1.0.0 1101 1. 3841. A ppellost ; 441 11 ,01 1 .1 . MOO * 11 " . wa.a""laßtirinbr. e ke best ie ia be ir ;rota 8....,..t 04 she to : " .!T er i a l:r i b t t he t i l r ie eru sit c ic i ; x ity'let faith ; do not in- and heartless, popularity which 4" to be got by die were fit to be enterionied by the Haste*, was it un- , 1 Hespoodeat. . . ~ _. : 11 * relics; du not insult ion of consistency, and Could only be retained W., constitutional in its object ? or was it jolt tun' This west ail Appeal from the decisios of the F• 8•401,• M ei r Ira" opposed " ie . . " Ai. " o . r the Calltwijors, w e e he their - bumble bue. 4. • :`: 'Alai : du not later- Weaustent dereliction from principle. Conscious proper for tlx deliberation hf Parliament t If it renewed Ins upposenos fat fraties. He wished the •Kt • • --4 Chsacery, !reload. the 1 1. 0 „,, ee & m em , „,„ the ,i iuss i on , s * w e b - t h ey ~,,e f are with their anetut , . boor prevent them .f his comparative inability, be (Mr. PlunkeSip.. • mace unfit for the considerations( Parlimosaia-if the ' Pr. Agar met Mfr. Rhaftwell were heard for - 1 Ord Mr. Wedowee sod Mr. Lows( foe mks ResPo I, • v •- • •• OPIISSe• 1* time yaw Den a measure was proposed foe open. from worshipping yr . _ r .• : accenting to dim, pressed his design to fallow the hook-pi of legeletr. object sought were uncomtitutiesiel-..4lllo.4isabilitiet .• -.-- , No '. , metals ism la the essay sad navy to the Catholies ; dictates of tgel e . , '` ,—( Le e e ee er s.)— parted friend. Actuated by the ounte..apillisa and exclusions oomplvassed of tfaitriutifitsily just ' 1 Jorlassem ppaposed. . , it , ~... wear l irt 114 lasetes, and lie hellish cry of il N• if t h e 4 4 • Catholics - did ~ t r • their as using thus& kgi t te winch his Oir. Cepottaat's) . and necessary for the prutectieu rof the tosattio- - - • IRS ZAST lIIDIA COMPAIT, los beer totroessfully forged, ilss proposal nes. • .. . ,-. . • erre seven, itesposoilieL . • at sloe, i h eu an that was weit h s b y t h at me ,. .pcsgsslitly SO they I .' wimp • • ' •Melscp lied bequeathed, he intended to pit lion. thew the subject•lnvald-be trawnissed , .. Rim smarom,Hyonsi deem era sliddsesallr Alt MA t/. ' , bin berm emeeded. A Balt to that effeet was Irroug: ‘ did Oa I . IOIWOMI4f , K a T - ream, - u not measures which he hetlieuseued iu pi friss, Omsk e,tinstielk - 1404 were _._.. ... .- . . . i- ..1; . -•-• 4111 Weems el' Let*, I. tlll3, by - s Ilibsitlbse - ite itooll is oes?c,Atig stli+st i; tiro, hi if yes dos CArlholia Ofitliff.anitjaCha He Imiliwit emmesterit with 'tlie at the '--... • • ei s m 0 5 716.8911 IN fall.lie the itiN ',p it sad itavas psseetitintrib tbo Coaslestos, la - Sole "TOO reduce yourselveito t im e (level of these for whom up tlse•Pelittori. .1.. i ' Constitution and the claims of justice; t it wa.,, . ~------ ' • ' - . .. , ...- sleeedortio• l• coosnls • •e• sUllut Bill " you legislate; do not consult Catholic floarda, but Mr. D. BROWNS, just. seconded the mallo• as he bail before termed it, neither just, tsar molly, - . • - 1 'dor• v i• Admiral might by mrd the Chemmel em, and c onsu lt 1.1.6. il a ill gefletroikh was twos ` . - oth tss mixt , * be hod them , their adisinion to your own atithority ; and if there be soma The Petition was brought up aest MOW very nor catidid, hee hottest, tO meet the proposition lty • I Asellata. • ,- . l 3 4 • i . j , '". . wish* it bad pfeviossly het!. foretailt, world lead t o the who, ill the struggle for their tights, have acted ra- distinctly. Some of the passages iu itugretwartaly any argunseitis founded on the probable detail rof • . , --....-•••••••- •. " ..4 Me. spine,, IlisspisillkAuseebt up is Imo- eeeeltroe of the Coeattiotioa. Tice moult. of slat met- *her too intemperately.", Jet out that act agrinst the cheered by the House. ob. measure to be proposed. One thing -Ise - her, noun; of th e ea ett Illagpl'Arfaialelef7l l ,lll9 sum; ISO wiateaded, had bens say thing but dangerous and great body of the Catholic.. Stich a sYsieln is not Mr. PLuswerr prevented other Petitions from hewed no person would deny. that the question was • -.. 1. , I to /smeary 1110.—Rn.1 sod i•lamifif4.l4 c.. he diurgra with i^c " giateet Y shim wile havie l 6 " 1 " 4 / wiadotn, isnot justice is not truth.—(Hemr,/settr.)— t l x Catholic Perishioners of Si .'Andrew's. St. of vital importance to the country ; sail if it Isere' ' • - . Tan a c trox n,.* grit•Tsawits, ~- opposed il, bed afterwards acquiesced its it, tom came for. 1 A Judge yore countrymen by their own acts, restore Mark's, St. Asia's, sod St. Peter '., Dublin; sod admitted that the granting of the claims might The LORD NtELLOR•oMiI be rose irelblpitra ward to oppose the . Catbolie clams upon the . ease grumuits. , Mr. SA RH A M disapproved of these Petition'. A Pets, ioa peace *lid concord toirelund, and restore to England of the calamity and city of Waterford. do no harm. it was far more certain that it • poet aliefervislisf heir Lordship' that two - were tooser . ehrid ... itch , the ease or Eke purl • l N iM mo re. had *seal presets ... ied . from the Clevyy of Leicester, which the services of' the flowards, the Arundells, the The Petition. were all ordered to be printed. would do a great deal of good.-.(Ileor, heor.)--i ... - -..• •. . • I. do aidrtet Clisseery. 4 4Ffit the elitassolosees of the 1 /"" 4 " wit. sallells l l. sod he thought the Homo °eche Clifford., and the Petrel, of which she has lung CATHOLIC CLALVIS. •r. -• • . Those who opposed the principle merely on ire- ..,., -. ..... . _ -___,_, ta- a-A ....---..4 a.- to murk Ito lionroollopo at such ibtitiotte Wee tweetated to 1...,...„ A.:,...;,., : „ 1 - /I . 2 ___ L___ , LB_ __..5,i „.,..„,„1...1„ a. - Ir II- • • • J• ,-__-_.2 ans..l ..f •1... ....-1...)....1.1.;,..4. L. ..... .rimoskeuml met •A . .. , .‘. 1101.161 OP > XlOl/113, Waiameisav, ISastsllllolll. " 1- - lie ORR* d s ptete liereveleare **deck OR to sfeertobiske mos etrospletehr Sped. 7lse SPEAK boob Hie Choir al a groorlor Tire sew *ohm beak tit. oaths sad their The Comity ZINK Nap ciael Pin was reaß veto ' ad Ir. wit comerieritted. • • ••••• • " 'vs • " Me. dolmen. fwe ß Vzgl i tglllle s 11er. ed a •.• , - 141.4 r . 1:11110. CaMiE "mat Preilleee trees boll- toisigy • iiisr, eispialehog et evi- 460eval la Abate & * * • • • • fair.C.4io4oAS priesetiA. a ahrilar Rasa tie lleeberg. Is the Resell .et links, sod ea- ' . . r ." 1 " 91 " ' • iliarodlors la the pryokilly of Newberg. „Plosiftllsd 1 1 Is4el4pr Petidee *en the 04 0 sad 1.6 Gal LaeußeMers the r • . - • • 4111118411IreelliNSPI. ita *ARV T presented three Petitioss, of the oillore, from the Comity of Essex. M A BER LY pretested a like Petition from the Cathay of Northampton. These Petitions were severally ordered to be printed. CATHOLIC CLAIMS. Mr. P. WODEHOUSE presentrd a Petition frowi the Okay of the Diocese of Norwich, against the Catholic A similar Petition was also periled from the Ckrgy of the Diocese of Exeter..—Ordered to be orbited. ay. ve crrwat ovular . (. Ike Cs- . m from • had signed' this Petition.—(lfeer, *eat, km 4 i O - t l ie & mac — -- tcr 1 ; . „ - c 7 - 1, - doots —ivi ti o f il so lb u rpillam.... smolt fairly to objecl. What he was sh‘titt to he Peti- Ordered to lie on the table. .. Hi„bj aci a „ to pat as sa d ta . t r aman g ons . a ng propose, was the appointment of a Committee to e Roman MORAY. distraction, by doing ms set if jodisq. He pee, adjust that detail and give the safest effect to the urea were Lord Coret,sauaou took this opportunity of cww i e d w p m • we iszese r rujimil • „doll proseiple. No sine who heard his would be die- and seven answering a %Aleutian that had been put by an justiogo ono Aso% that imolai to soy. tart no plan **adjust be adopted by r of their Hon. and lant Member ( Sir It. Wilson o% • t i n , 4• ji cas ia.A... g . ca d ev i l • - A I forward former ' re tin tkitiztipt.iist -- of. j ustice. .11*-:' Obi* Mss . or iboetho Alaimo could nova; be so modified 1 • fer4bistairerliiii - at thle period, t- awl had to propose would be met with • groat degree us to render it safe and proper to grant them. No rby the (mid a letter . from Sir Wm. A'Cours, which he o f sat i s f act i on, an d w i t h warm reeling, o f gra fi s man could Celli that there were no such plan, or d on any would take the liberty of reeding. The Noble hide. This latter consideration, howevet, he con. that the obstacles to adjustment might prove likely to Lord then rend the letter, which, after describin g aidered of very inferior importance, though a sob- on examination to be insuperable. If there question, Lyon Whicii he 1011 FL •k -n rri- I in- Part OSS, lAN • ; .etl ; arde• rich ; pro, et all ri v et? rig fe.• /snit cil 1 Ire at • .~ Ter sl•t .