The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-12-06 00:00:00

iw.phl. 4* 71 ' . - 4 r • • . , . . . - . 1011011111 " ."1111111 • , . • VW .-41:tIligrOk• e-tiiPitlflits•JiOn. 3. liii Lordship being obliged to 111 f et a . , • . , • ~.—.00.-_ SolicitemOtrieral, yet he did so • • fir inser:ltalie dely , thathe she '.. WS:lines it: -... ...• •. MU ire WARD. • ~,,i , '. •:ff . ...a • . . .... , He • • 40ftrevlitiebeiwita said Om Aateraeryfieemetossimew.is r oa w i Leett i s a lf ir tl hat t l as • or il i; e ad s : I 4hrwore' for the Puttee* .1100 sweweebllf the i l asith ' s 1 "' the g b be hadhe ■ rd the ar t '.• totting the new trial is shls. easet.r- He trusted, ftw-'tulle .. . c4lll, 61 wishing . for .6 mat vial., I.:ti who opposed it. H i e had eras Iw i :if Sweat of Mr. Attommr.sot witnesses wbo were ceatnineil, Am. his Lordship world. tow proceed witij the further t hat . . tearing, cartons documentary evirienc mined that the case wee sot pees' . 4 111r.Wttorney General.-Whin - this Case was last he. such • view of the subject as the ...i , Ike the Court, he understood that his Lordship %H- -._ this evidence which had been wit' ~.... g r i.. ........ imetedw ir lt ir a t t h h i l e ct i h ci e , 4 =1:11 , 17 10 0retI n. O H O e tlf e h lt i s t i o t :hr fi V e :Or h e at il t seated Independent of thie, the esrrsd pro ceedings in this Court would i • • . • ~.-../‘; sub a course ought to have bees pursued. As the asst. P the cermet. T he Learne d tinnily( • `• ..w. 1 .4, , terstood, its was perfectly igmaradt en what grtrand the for a DOW trial until the rising of ,• •+ .:..- - ' th ew trial was moved for, not having been furnished with • •'-' - Tartu:name ia•suppore of it. But if the 'rotted was, -was--- las the weight of evidence was against the verdict, he • coy RT OF KING'S BI Mast confess that it did not appear to his that the ver. SEDUCTIO' .• ';', . diet was fully warranted by the evidence adduced. He PALMER IP. LgO 41:ei .41 nniagt oh da u pon olcatii.oneaf: I. y :seat ed" . r... . . , gro unds , ,e t h out ye . This was an action to recover e foe tliesloction of the plaintiff i 1 .. ..,, , , ' .- • utile le was entirely ignorant of them. -.it re would he ..: would " pieti e s to this suit; but it did appear kables.dta• the ..: ';'11. :.' . h . team , r b •,it h Y Rot w a l i hk a th u. c n . • c : „ N ß a oll A i n ll l N i tt y c l . Me flo P v detfilede was r d t' by wase . ••••• . whereby tia wl.i bio. irchi e ; n: 1 1 tari o nnr s lost tpi person her services. teiw ei:ie p,eiisetifin employed - in to) t . .11. i,?• leaded lb. trial on the pot of the Crows , ► t the sale an orphan , who, from molfvr • • an ti..e'be(alt cottvioetid, that if tilt •pe►sow repr.aeatleg taskes Into his wife's house, end oe +Olt . • Ike lowest of site Crow) ilsongist.tite wertbet of ilieffits tutdhi ff ir the itwiffeee who rented ,defeadlot was a person of could,/ 'rt klinfin duet essatierceuey, thong* •ii Bret ' favecableta / -iv; • tbeatßeetwist f reseatrd. Wilt such Rutile lisigettlhie i ll p s p r 1 / 1 1 " in thetb° l se• 0041 +5 eV o unities of using say ionisers - • • • i.:*l , • .. ttoVirlutec was in themcases nsimlly beide ekst *Peg* pew., e l ect e ts „„,„ 10 ,,,,g t „ „ I 4/ gleleadd be takes of AM cireost•taletwa:: - • *ri.. , ' tiff and his wife had 0(4 the idle IstrAtterner General-The. Crowe wae-aftwOodelly thing improper had her passed be . . . i... 7 0 . tit& as t fi e•savi qtr-lesets: swiltlidnetabilir bill %drams, until Melees occasion tl ..1- scot th, issuser is eei l i s bis !ohs is glie:holtis sf.sogisrib tee tif bride cake he had received likeeMind; that it did out suffnr iich 'ersaaidocationslo present like this frost • person it , . i . 11 e'er& its judgment . the girt , mused the just alarm. ~'rete %Iced- Vitencellor-If the Attorney &steel ~ E ros whieh the p sintflf learned the slimwelght of evidence in • • favor. of the vim '""'t• she wamsomo Soothe advmsood and i • l ii r i rtillegitistatiy,. elthongh- la • oppositicia to • the w raaem 's iline ' l • 6111161 ` i 1 ' t tt ere of coarse the eoeseqeenoes. 1 • 'interests of the Crowe, still he would do that gentleman i coos i d „,,bk, • the jaaliete , se say, , lkat be did, not ditabt bet that be Me niece. sod ::d Pe 6 9bteleie • also been ender wrositi .44 Is4bia saw ,Imobierr. es *II former Atom, - lob lowlier serenin to ill her sits ,enala-holl theoeteetllgp Lordship thought he ought So reel that the melee was bran i .; 3 7 4 hinftWilde a riliyla Wit laser, Willi liberty to have ei Ike Mainilfr hue risedend ID th endia, ,, Xrial as • Attorney General. .11,...however, &am*" nattooof• ebee•f°est h s t bas with Lie verdtct, the Court would can- same to ameldet • ail . tb° denials ' 1446 ft sea - mit *.kki Attorney (lateral had buss 11.111461ak lb" they eight not IZT . • flit Lt eight to iofitrat Lis LorliaLip,that in i h ,e„„ es .h er sslf and rho ' of Me Solicitor General, the reply would be - pnedenleve of her evidence 1 • ;are, lisi If , and, spedup bra ' Aves•Allemkitte shwa of the plait ~. . . , .. e therefore, with all doe ilefer- ; bet it did not appear that th it M egi 4 r:11. T ee f= 0. . • too of Mr• Attorner, be • felt quite art to elect hay submissive . - • • • eftlfrilfierld •Indefiste on any material points bad sot • lbeekargeon sad IL. Midwife: ' been • AUfevitheamey. . • liskeikonetteisesit were also ailed '' '-- Me. a Wals•witirldr. Searlett. sod the other p en- aeababreeeirenfian; hills. whist. the 4 , *Oa bed keel hearel against the elkomssee of the F emm wr- 11 . pn witfi•rfs ited to should• lees*: cessititieri • iti malt quite .„,,,,.., 5 .,, 916 " 146616w 0 . .....thr•••lll4.irlis • . ittirrargai s iseek, after theatall entail R ation which this cue ""'"'"" -- " ed - ‘" --116 * /11.1111116/11 • seed vkarsetor, •'... ii*Llalgt,trale_ *On ensernif Innir elan the time and - iiii:KUtere, fordo *Abodes i 'hideout _ssepoteirt. ken- yam qo Abbots AMA Pal, this deseriptio• his asks bkowist • nisei' Ma Inbilielgnea it 1, 4 10. and he 'did not • titan to lide. aides- orlactraMlltases .1441 I eup.AinatakeliteroluCtatet•zeurriaggi west to aqta*lielt aniikuuseectr" thiti 'VW ether pure • . '.... HNC p prior :sentreiegg.. bud ••ottt bus aolcuniaid s pe to tiadlittlate ierfleerrY. This nealwa Maidareitue dn. Mut Auk girgelcusig, . It was opee 0 11114 . 1eurselt forshe had her owes. OntiXwdtilene esocfretorwe‘aast forma mirage. igkiels rw to avail herself of te llif i ftl 10614 mislilisk tlie 14elismey of these chilslces, , N. rwrmiseaserelwregie • therillieu • • ... rule itiblowcefitcogreiO s .,biditeen Made:edam* itraWM bsgt di gsseggreg &ghou l ish's.: • • . • • wig& ItiAte . emptied est the evideaer of regkitatioq,o Op T at: . ow semi who ' , feetant Upetlige: fiteerAtelessiL ttitre•alispitteit.thas Oa • , -, • gighe ievoo ote h o t amp . went abuts ittaaryingitiMeelf - 6;4 pp • • ..... *' Vim 114: ii; 1000 4 *NI lit's•Mbeit. in bet, tiwd.lte tiet sly A• .• *- .„S. • • • .041dokeit ef a t oegigliticalt to ioppage,that seals prise • ... • falters plane. The gt= g fur hie Lori • 1 rer ' atibillsot tudtheir of • • hey.liftoribejt had taken I . - I.lllll**TO. o Rao -Ott the . , sup : ~ ••i,. : Mk ehteMeeatlon, world '1 ' • - • ' s ik e =e4l4ase,lais Oka • . • .'• . a • 61 1 11111111 heliafgea• sheaf npuigtsge • • ,- , 44 •• f lificiest torneu 'aping lei • tie Ike ibry. tketAllesegli • . .- 4: • ,• • I- - tr, iky.hcri_._Attioriffa It I#•., .-;.;.. . 'telestereast esipktria to ill 4 1 • 1 . • I 2 p ieF.'•• • illr - CIW!d Cat W011:W •' It sties had dot bewrglikeed t a r t • Leta W. watarit.te . ber.• the esrflot • - '' * lig libtbdre em•pleZiliy i ! • • 1 .. . dastioseicallose t wisetheree.feells theithle . • V filo adittilttibid s to lbele g . -weetlin'.44lol Ana. -palpable • isjustice, - wog be dupe, : Lt thsrefoe• Wallet ill O. Or peal .. sat ought to 4Mlik theAletert go •Ogor.it O. blt ' • to give. The quest's" .iiiii.? ‘..4la_apptchearled , Rusk was,. Logerissmos glie wldtikeo WI. to the compensation . o n e s , tv ho pmeeit t fo r a Atm , w il d . to when . t h itit 000 to tb iamb& 'tat tits tiary he had cut . li, *eiders. habitues i llopeoperly..rocaived iSr „oq that us e .7 ll°ll "7tt for shot irMet ro made- Dames" eMlarAsalitil„Aboll -sepie -lispairtant etedieetay,k i iak boon a '--,-..-- . - . . . 4 . , . • re)eetrd ea H. forme* aessaink. •. - ... vtimoiertiore ask I , • The SaillgletiLL feilWeed. • • 4 _,• las awe, ON TOO ritOleCt • „ ,1 ' LO*IicdONCILLeOR iaid, that one question which • l ' i " ' ,• . bisiitiadwas, whether be ought net, after the This was too indictment again 4 t 7 too d e .to t h e hf„ tev e„s ve , to have Ruud fortune, add his amebas • • -ille pititittiver4o the persons representing them ritanaeo_,llaselabdr• It aPite.:erd f . . asoibelreeses, leaving Ward ag.ejoet theta balf•fnne Pfneenatinnt war- . 11 ; if :11e.:411100C bin thought proper.? Whether .he coach-boos. of the prosecutor. I ellpitet aftio .bloat. aired, Ward; as .edicestqf, , the Wl_lane. lelieston , which we , ~.•o loo r t,. t o a m ** vi a tootw i o t s li mi d iiit Mr. Hayward's dwelling-hoes. , ~ . •••• • a i :•• were too low for his carriage, i e k • - .: . ' -... ' i. , kranifighs.t-"The oilier piny 'did tiOt ailt•fee .quested Mr. Harried to take ti • *• , , the latter refused to do. Mr I '• k , . ' WC for • that itiiidatotent of a gegoitat i i t ...Op; . __ ' , .. • .. _ . ,,,... semi chimney-sweepers into the - 'flu Lisiin •Cstaxcithhour-In this case there wore first a negm• to who° be Point * • • dine •fatties, die plaiodff aid' defendant; ,and the adennua a a nbhanersw e eT er : - .. glen. Os the Mhkeef May last, . • lfe. Haul would not confine himself to : ilia slop y makers were in the stable and m fo pea • r s new trial. bat would ask that It ;Sighs be rotted the gates singing, dancir .* l.O bir (a trial before a Jury. that four Vgdges, of leniewe I they continued , 111 , 11 P 1 . , . t jei gi o, Beech presiding .)- If eversa .„„.4 e ,„ o 44 . when a consume desired mesa noises lossailleatioa olbasesksopralaampoi,•gges she p o i geentitaway. lt did not appear goat,* tledrt. -..-... ti;a4... ~.• „.„, „.. Feesy . or hie servant were upon ' „ilk (taws. ate thwearee sieba-aersid ;tam the ewe After the cue of the protean Wog sarain seek befoul aJory wit titionewokeini... Igo* SZESSAT 4 T, who appeared i ,:•. which bed bees started. •uniese ids; forehohip .41bas or ht rested, on the suggestion of tit . t eierobjectifinierrere likely to teed fisatifiseenefonein- that his client should enter into r 0 trent Marne already arrived at; . and, leggin, •Is h e . 'repeat the annoyance, and shot it it 9 e s festiesnan at. tlie bit; as ti , vorilt-irsald Asmara 'assonant. milk_ justice ti . i , '. IA aillecetles?' •.• lf there bed bees a former marriage, brostsea should emires; op to 41 . 1 • , . Weald set•evidente to that effect bare been produced? Mr. Sc aRLETT . 1 " the p ro " i' : 4: / Woald.the nether and father have cnocisied it ,- nod prop os a l, which hefted always • the lieu andesvonrul. te bastardise their issue? Would to accept 1 and • the - Jury were , • 1 .• '. • - tut -there 'rave- been. some members of the (cosily who any verdict by " 14 '1 11 or 1 / 1 6 C . t ; ' • but *Leeriest It? 'The • marriage of UM was repro. • CURIOUS tat 11 ' seated tel:lave been selemaised bete/elm William Cot. -!' • übikettovit t . , . • tqe, bachelor; and Rebecca Webster, spicier, which of This a.efindtwis brought by Itself a:slatted she idea of a former imirriage. With ing bear Millis, against the 4 ,! . Ei Vetspeg to the charge against Ward, of keeping the heath and fereenericn stage. ft •• A • ~ . Cootie ignorant* of the illegitimacy °title lunatic, all had sustained by the miscall - t. . , • ,tr• •., the 'advantage arising out of that fraud hid been reaped coachman.. •• - leglibelplaintiffs, who were themselves eccesswy thereto, . The actident for which the i seekerititt new ewer before the Court to make it a mat. place On the 10th of April, in k i •-.sref•S' foresebenmelaint: Ow the part of Ward It was a minster. Mr. Lovegrove was ' .. • Tpt. venal oases: st 10. attars of lunacy. it was of cross in his gig, accompanied 1 , • ,-.- g . When the tam was is till Master's office, that it ink on the off•eille of a coal-w ' . ... • ,;.:• t maid lee ascertained whp Wee thesext of kin ; had, la the 'he defendant , coining toward . •• • t i ne's& instinct. the plaintiffs-bad been content t 3 re- in contact with it, and caused i .• :.rov. se thenionry, Without darfig te•have their title invem Plaiatiff thrown into the sir -i. ' A•il• :- 0 •ml ' plaintiff, and two persons who ; -, .. „„,,,,, Di- • 1 . ••• "4 .it Eke LORD CH Averia.ok,--if -the representation now street, described the accident t'.: l:,.' • S t ade by t; s r,i had been laid lietOtre him at the time of the conduct of the defendant's I .. . , his directing the ;sato% which' it was.alleged it Wig, his jog at a t ,110 1 , , end who did n . ~ - _ )l4strlshi2 certainly had not done bitAnty. • his 'coarse to avoid the gig. I ~. ' : f i. . Mr. Parrs ronelarled.-He apprelended that the trade for eompensittion to the ' f - ... Ohm Never sent a ease to ii• new trial, mtlegitutied,4 vepsirs of the gi.• could not c . 1 . that tboadditiorrstrosidvare, whieh was hilegeti• to have *nerd rather elefrud the mei°. been Witlitteld,•wield Mel -probability alierthe termer 'We ferar"° ll 131 . 7 .• 6 d.; • .1 ' .. . 4 rtrikt.. :lf the 4tiestio• were •to.be tiled,-twice, his 'taw er 'eels, whrreie those bri • • clig•t might rabidity move fora third ' , amino the ease (-; For the defendant, the coat might go on, till in Me end there vas very little pro- kliblze who was on the dickey . petty worth trying left. !Nee, of Chating 0r05 . % wb 1 i . t • , :- ' - • - Mr. Pniht.tes (from the Court of Kittle Bench) ar. *nosed that the coach had se ' *. geed on the same side. ' - . • . ifull ',mineralise to therstaishe - Mt. Mar rtpiied--Whatittrif tree* Itelisituftipt- • init.* wheat. Tko:FaaeL • • 1, . ‘'." . . 1 . " . • . . '. l s. :. . • . . . 1 A • • . • . . - . . . .. . ~ .. • .. • ...... , ... ___.,........... - •••,.....,........__ ~. . .• .• ..,..-"Ait.b. - . , 1. , V _Pa.' lAi !.- 3411/MaliaC o *_ . , .' . T STAWSIif AN Lear Mar leafed of Ito wet eoesider In the per. Should litre twee juatillea td 'not the tideway of' Molleitor•©eeeral °peek !arguments of the Gentle• ' read not only t h E erideaee .nell. hut he had looked over •virtenee, and he humbly sub t presented to the Jnry with the prodnetion of some of withheld would have pre. the refusal to predate the alone hare bees fatal to •man went on to argue if the Court The Soucy/vs JENCU, Dec. I. EDUt N. LUGO ITT. compensation in damages 's niece by the defendant, concerned by Mr. Gooney sad by Mr. ISCARLCIR. to the Jury. ife said the the ratan* of the Duke of on the busioess of a straw Audley-street. Ills nisei lees of charity. had her . oecarlonstiy assisted WOO rented apartments of her. The eoasiderabie property, occ=z t, sad by that means had inofseements he might think. pro- anfortunate girl. The platy slightest suspicion that any bettrien the defendant and )n the latter had gives her • yeti from one of his friends. In • situation so he above An explanation ensued. the whole of the fatal troth ; 'doomed in pregemney by the de to perform her esoal work Mr. Palmer had been At obtaining medical assistance foe coder the necessity of employ. ter situation. It was for these a brawl* as well as for the la id la the oseeetioe of his niece. therefore, hoped that when the Jary eleenatstasees of the ease, they to give damages whirs plaiatif. proved the criminal and the defendant. evidence were tee indelicate for weer tbit the defendant had remitted 'absolute.. Midwife-ado Itaddlleinind bar at • celled. teeploseei *weed phi" lie ealiNsM preorest list bnIMPAIIn 4 1ted always been sednitAnd diellindmet. geld, that is a mini Of seder pallier Mittel medial of eeelle lay the scow in Pl - 6 v c rit: ll2-I ' lls e passion totild'he called id cow:. sells* was riot brought by the ewowesedyff **bad theist* '•Withe pimiento's her tioele,' et a servant ; Vile tees of me snore to Me Mae if taw .osab ' imie• or any other female ter-- `• what *as the sun the plalodf etnployed la hie nieee's that ,the made or the east say improper latereourse niece. He therefore hoped Awl ail }ha clenuestances of to.tid giro the plaintiff Utile • seamed up the evideees, oh 'ph the ea. *blab bed heel .. blithe place of the pialatlre it was steer that seas per. Mikpsrpse. The weft sad disk respective distends • their idiot *of the design; they ' shoal/ ;testi* however, vioahl veinal*. -tio*Athe eatidodi sustained. &bolt half hoer, Fatalist' •Dataaget W. ends (Orly alifilitei rOVII aricuaLool. . raoturcurion or Laval, it against Mr. Frary, a, gentle. cesebrnan, named Koper, for a .d from the evidence on be. Fairy took a stable and Mr. Hayward, at Cado. were separated only tenni le - lay a yaed. The premises and he consequently rev them off his bands, which Feary then, threatened to to premises ; and bronght anted ont the entrance, and er ; but neither look posses: last, • number of Irish hex. ll:each-house, and gathered ,cing, and making various uproar until ten at night, Jew to retire, and they Went ippaar that ea this evening Mr. upon the premises. mseeutor was closed, the Cox 'ed for the defendant, coo the LORD 01111 F Jusitce, oto a rule of Coact not to mold submit to a refetence to the terms op which the co Mr. Hayward. , lei:mentor, acquiesced in the sys expressed his willingness ere discharged from giving I Court. DRIVING. V. RAM • - $ proprietors of the Block. for the ,datosicr which be millet of the defehdast's action was brought, took in Parlistnent.street, West. dricieg up to Charing. ted by his nephew, and pass. .1-waggon ' when the coach of reeds the bridge, was driven ed it to be overturned, and Ile Meet. The nephew r.f Ihr Ibe were walking along the n as occasioned entirely by 'a coachman, who was dri v not deviate in the least from On an application Wag defendant, he ' , ad that tile cost fifteen guineas, anti ton tba'n..psy such • I.; hut 71. 7.. et thii was* broken were old. Lachman, a helper front the. fey, soil the foreinan'of WWI Was rifling on the boa.. set down tbepassongers, sink at a patois( eitn.assra than Jaoti th?irship, but the , 7 irld had the whip, which tit* driver said he Id net wait, These witoesses declared that ttit Ent -rosy solely from the imprudence-et Mr. Imem to attempting to pass between two Ilea', ire-, beginning to reply is' behallof the plaintiff, when The Jury intimated that they would not troaltle him, and found a verdict for the plaintiff—la-maps IW. i _....... COURT OF COMMON FLEAS. Tnuasear, Nov. 5. tinCIAL JURT.—Before Mr. Justice Ouneouou. ' QUESTION OF UROITSMACT.—comoss out. JAMF.E IIEAD V. MART MEAD. Mr. 'AmtARAMS opened the pleadings in this ease, and Mr. Sergeam (toccata followed oo the same side.' The question tor the Jury fo decide was, whether the plaintiff WA* the legitimate son of Mary Head, the d.- 1 Pendant. The father and mother married in 1795. William was a carpenter, and died at Lambeth Mardi. It appeared that Win. Head was addicted to drinklig„ and his wife left herimshaad's boost, and went to reside at Kent Fame. Beckenham; she bad a small annuity, in her own right. This took place in 1795, and all chil dren born in wedlock are legitimate, unless it can be se tisfactotily proved to the contrary thin there was an absence of intercourse between the husband end wife. At one pwiml of the law of this country, ifs perms were beyond the King's dominions, by that kw issue of the wife was bastardised. The ancient live was, that it was Impossible for a man to be the father of the cond. where it could be shown that he had not been within the King's dominions fur a long period of time, .bat Ye tWs case it wculd be proved that tlisi husband had vislied his wife, whose residues was sinly eight mileti , •iiiptait' from that of her husband. , .5. .o. Mr, Kicarby proffered the register of ilisardigs dee. tweets Elisabeth Head and William Head. at Lambeth t.' Joke Phillips —Knew Mr. aid Mrsitrad. whet IV" lived'togetPr 1 it was Ili-vraes ago : hail known MM. Head iirevions to his m opiate • he was a master cue penter ind bender; had wen 'Miss Davis before her marriage; visited them sfterwards : she was shout t or 20 years orate ; can't say how Wag they lived sit Lambeth ; 'recollects their separating, from the rPport• of Mr. Head ; she removed to Kent House Farm; fleet know what led to their separation ; went to his funeral; be died i% Lambeth Marsh. • Mts. Elisabeth Oreenberry exainieed, by &Weft Hulloek.—Witness remembers living at Kent liamill Farm. Wu the house keeper to Mr. Randall, and Is his sister. Knew Mr. Head, the husband of Mrs Head —hes seen him at Kent-horse farm—saw bian-severat times, bat did not see him always—opened the door the last time she saw bins. and let him in. It was the latter end of July, or beginning of August—it wu in harvest time. Mrs. !had was at home nub Mr. It , her brother, who was laid up with the gout. lie allied for Mrs. Head—he asked if Mrs. Head was at home,ond whites* showed him into the kitchen, and said she would telt Mrs. Head of his arrival. hich sbe-did. •It was 011% Sunday—she went down to the kitchen to him. There wawa* other pewees in the kitchen—this was the last time willies:saw Mr. Head, it was about 10 or 1 1 o'cloelti Witness left 1e*1798 —die has only bees there elate as a visitor. Mrs. Head, from the observations slal Made was in the family way When she left. Mr. Sergeant Lens (with whom was Mr. Sergeant VAEORAN) now addressed the Jury for the 'defendant, and contended at *ode length that though t Dowstant access by a husband to his wife would be a presuiptleto proof that a child horn of his wife within e proper delft was •his. yet it should be proved that the actese taut oft kind affording robahle of that intercioutd from which offspring eyelid a thee went %beatnik all the lettuces le which w eb said to haw visited tie i , wife, and contended al t of (hem afforded sash a piesaniption as that which the plaintiff's eildbed dad endeavoured to establish. Ftom 'elitist Suer het beard =implies west the other way ; list:theNtects tufts atteallieg this erseWeh behAmeddloaserw. lnd gibich wood put the question of illegith•sey has youdisll doubt. He would rely, thee,—first, on tier west of evidence of that access on-the part of the •ifeabsod tom which en intercourse of a particular kind coetd lo Inferred. He world rely upon the circumstance of Mrs. Head's attachment fur young Randall—on the fact if het having had, in •the year 190 f, one year after her hoe band's death, in illegitimaltiv child by this Randall—of her having been married to him fire or six years after, and oe the fart that the present plaintiff, from the time of his childhood up to thieommencement of the pretest action. had gone by the name of James Randall, sod net James Head; and that Randall, the husband of Mrs. , Head, paid for his education; and finally. that in the last will of Wm. Head, made in August, 1800, just three days before his death, lie bequeathed his estate sod affects to his blether John and his sisters, to be divided share and share alike.and appointed John sole executor.—Tho I will also contained a bequest of 101. to his wife Elisabethl if afire; but not a word was said is it of any child.; though it must be evident if hie washed bad a ehild by I him in 1799. he must Lave known something about it before Mutest, IWO. These facts, when considered in opposition to the slender evidence of access adduced by the plaintiff, would, he bad no doubt, satisfy the twiods of thealu ry. that he (the plaintiff) MIS not entitled to a verdict at their hands. Mrs. Southall.-1 am the sister of Mrs. Head. now Mria Randall 1 remember her marriage with William Heed. They did not agree well afterwards. There was a mutual ditlike. He used to drink more than he ought, bat there was nothing else bad in his conduct as I saw. My sister left mi. in 1797. Not long after she went to Kent farm-house, where Mr. Randall lived. She re mained till April, 1799, when she left, mad was delivered of a son in the next month, at Chisellnirst. She had an illegitimate child by young Medellin 1801. She coiled it Randall. 141 not call on her after this. She was wattled in 1806 or' Intl tolandall ; 1 'don't - kae* which. I was not present. Cross4tatuined.-1 did visit her ones after the hid, the child at Chiselberst, but cat after the one in 1501. The master to alum the plaintiff was first sent to school proved, that be nas know by the name of James Randall—That Mr. Randall (now married to plaintiff's mother,) paid the expenses of his education. This was after the marriage of Mrs. Held" and Randall. 1 thought the plaintiff bore a great t esembluce to Ran dall. Some other wit proved thit the plantiff was generally known by the name of Randall. and not' . Head. Mr. Jemmett, the coroner fyr the county of Surrey, was called to prove that at an, inquisition held by him os the body of a man named Hickman (we think), a per son named J sines Randall was one of the jury, and signed his name to the inquisition. Another of the jurors on that occasion proved the, signature of Jewell Rand .11, which a person acquainto with the plaintiff was called tovoce was his writing. _" .' . The probate of the last will ayfitilliarn Head was now put in. It was in effect what we bate before men tioned. Sirs. Southall was again called to speak to the time of her sister's marriage with Randall, hut she could not ' soy positively whe . hei it wee Ito 6 toe 1807. air. Sergeant HtLLOCK again add d the jury in reply to defendant's case' and again conteeded that is law, if the jury believed that 'there was access by the' 'husband to the wife, they must find for the legitimacy'. NO suspicions, however strong, would be sufficient to itiabtert that principle. Even if the wife of a man were to live In indisctiminste cosoimerce with four or live other men, still if she was id a situatioa where - the bus band coa4l have access to 13..t1sit lox 'mold_ pm _~..~ son. Nit :any' ehtletrew oho tticitt have tilt hi., however oauserous the cheat-et might ►e against the tea . . . Mr. Jestiee &aaw•ou evemewei *p the evidence with gryst cMroe.a, cothoteotitwr upon it as he weal. lo his view of the law of the ease, his I•nnistrip e curred with the opinion expreated by Mr. tievjeset delleek. The jury, after consulting together for a few minutes returned a verdict for the plAiatiff, thereby establishing his legitimscy. Thr core occupied the treater portion of the 41sT. As its conclusion the plaintiff was greeted with the rlAmoi. one congratulations of a host of friends, male a u female, who had Acoompanied him to cond. Lauarsca V. WINTSC-41/011.1171C AffitiT. This W4l an action to remover 411111.11/11 for as assault committed by the defewstaat alien the pkiatilf. Mr. Sergrznt PELL stated the case to the Jere, f •nrn which it appeared that the plaintiff, a married man, 4 ,4 fathei• of four children, was by trade a law-. Minu e t. The defendant, whose real *Mr is Whiter, iast wh ew fancy appellation is Spring-, is well knit% a is the sp an , inc worldwea celebrated pugilist. lie is also the l g , ep ,,, of the Weymouth Arms pohlic-bonse, Weymouth street, 'file dispute between plaintiff and defendant arose oat of a icht be , weeu two pogillets nimicd.S•ockma s sad Brawn, to the latter of whom Syring or Winter bad lcr,a as second. The tight took piaci near Cxiiridge. th the return of the ponies to London. they met at the Plough pablicshouse near Bayswater. A Kellen! cm. versorion arose here respecting the condom of the e vs . Wants arblidsnaded is the defeadlasea calling the pl a i l • tars dl.tifte t ywr, ii tf in Oilnitti . osientill 'llO °di* a jetamitti% itrwek him several btuiri orii:11 a riclA obi& stritito Bert miry no the hold. Nut bei-nr a Misch fat his assailant it such weapons. 4, ti ' lied faith d 4 tiettser' of the law, and hir Ow wt;iii r ifeita. 70 prove this was called . ' •.• • r.. A. . . - ..... .141es'i'arrell.-A . am Mt fOlthtr4o- l awnt itil k iii. tiff., I wont with' him to see the hoeing' miteh 'et Mt /indite. We stopped on oar, way back, at the Mach, near Bayswater. Wittier I saw at the debt, be was th e second of Brown ; Lawrence took so ran in the fight. .Lavrresee and I took two or Mtn pints alpine!' between oi Usti' Plough. We were both solter• we were eittin t the door of the public-house when Winter y came up. conversation arose respecting Hie met who f Meat : ',since - asserted that Brown:laed hit Stock man in the fight. upon which defendant told him he lief, and on his persisting is the assertion, said he w as a d--4 liar. - Plaintiff said if he, defendant, sail that Brown did not bite-Stockman. he was a liar. Mater then struck !aim several blows with a stick, which eat him severelvand the bloat lowed down in streams en each aide hit head. Pliant', was unable to attend to his let simass for a few dap, to esasegasoce of the severe usage defendant gave him. Cross-examined by. Sergeant Vacogate.-11 - , ant': only beer on our way home. I itas poaktive that 4, readapt gavel'', lie Orel. Winter is the aline of the defendant, kit be is letter know. .h! Os oasts tit, spriac . . . .40i- ,',. This was the plaiatlfra case. • • .. Mr. Nercernes-Vaustmte.for the def . conteaded that this was note ,comi which called for &awes. The plaintis who, they, wore tis;d, had a wife avid liar chin Brea. and who, they.would admit. might friers, ba t cir cumstance hare employed his time ouch then wiLicgaisg 1.5 miles out of town to en a fight. - wit. news sae. of those pugilistic contents. and ohlais us, hair cot lots a squabble, which, ocaording lb his sea witness, he comusenced by taring that the .Mg when defendant seconded bad acted unfairly. Now. that au an insult to the second., aid the plaintiff brought Um consequences on himself. 'Me. Justice Bu'ontouce summed up, and °hurried that 4 whom* samended at those fights bad a vightie Arms lilsepitiou•of what pained thou. and the plaintiff miry expressed hi.. when he was wantonly assaulted kr the defendant. With respect to fights of she kind *birds they -went to see, they were illegal, sod enfortanstely of late there had been very fatal couseqs•ores aitenliac them. Ily a late act. however, the Judges semi:A. powered s tt c te ts w fi l ih tte , acpacitoiredilszatot theis cmitacta.ntagsgstste: of the wise. and he believed. in some imitates', to trim portation. As to the damtges in the present case, the jury wauld consider it was not ova which called for sow thing like heavy duntgets, but the plaintiff was entitled ,to his costs at events. The Jury. after consulting together for five minutes. ;• fuand a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 10f. and colts: Quid at Teaks"? nit Pitrans deriderse. But Pilate did apt May for as answer. fate. Estroa—Permit me. ihreegh the limits of year in- valuable paper, to offer a. few preliminaey remarks on the usefulness arising to moiety from adeardsing the mire irt certain maladies, by a particular ditatlptiou of enedient . practitioners. who are frequently stigmatised with the ',i diot " disinterested Impostors." There la a linaof chattier tion to be observed. which appears *eldest to me, tad I thick would do so to others. divested of preSdice. that le, were the advertising practitioner a tioasetentima nil. try sullied by avarice, always bearing truth for hte motpii.er.t who makes use of an adtertisetnent a, a vehicle to brim forth the objects of indliermion. that pine to misery. ant bled' at the thought of their case being knows to their le wdly practitioner; and those aallappy obseets are bmtight forth. and restored to health. when they might hare b.** saarificed, or left to wander their days in wretchedness. — All instance of which I hat leave to annex is a letter stir dretied to Dr. Eady, dB, Deus-atreat,Salio, Gado*. " Sta,—Wheel I have reflected span your kindness:A rianity, sod liberality. tome, is my distressed. allieted,end Wore sitraadoo, when alter suffering for six months exam dation wawa I eaneot diatribe. an I which had balled eh lb/tardiest! eattiatanco I had applied to for relief. nod who I. was tadpoles' from the isedlcacy of medirin• takes in rein. Miammige inflammation still inereisitig, which was setteed ed by gaogroneseertillortios. and at fast death Marion me is that face. At this period of fay disorder, I anticipstott as no greet Witmer my dissolution as inevitable, with all . tfet attendant horrors which death presents to the bonne sited. embittered by the lacerating redaction. " Blame my Walsh sell"-1 say, when I reflect on aocasaneliert, courtesy. sad r . liberality, when I had so band so friend to emsetder no means of support against malignant thee/011$ that witch I labourodoadok remember that to yeti personal exotic**. Dean human aid is concerned. I as at this moment irodebffidfolt the life I maw enjoy , and for the Meath I am melody is pes . seadoe of. I tautoo t bet feat L flat acting pagrefetul to you to set peblishiag my ere tO.lh" , :world, Or stieisiog. in a To* public way of yosi beget.- fence to me then I base. - " Rh. Sir, Conscience makes coward, of as all. Bet still I hare thought a plan might be des iesd, In which this nialet. to me so desirable, might he accomplished, an.l the bereft. not only others but to yourself be felt as extensively.' I wish it ; and therefore if you think proper in any iffy to mention my are. so far as to save me all the pain narettea mast produce on such a subjea. I'o,ll only Feel I sesslsiod part of a duty I owe you (and a small part Indeed I aelosou , ledge it is): for were 1 to lie. ages. and experience more than 1 here ever dune of the conleudinceireseesteruna of this ' life, lam assured that moth% candthefface from toy sameedyr or cheer my apirite more, then The remembernitn or meat" which can cease to be drat to ma only with aty.life. sm.. TO Doctor Esq. id; • l ' iug ‘ itir • .1"/:11.114ageNlYi Dean-st. Soho,. ' ay .:`? . Lipids* i MAUI, 'ti t Via KM1 1 44, is: Mei "'The Itrasjuness" ' CrventulrOt r Paro.l Me. Set Ikraiii.l,l WOOMIL. t se .viro•• aiewasm L iksiswo, , orairihiew TlKAlt iele r • b• Manumit • - . , • Y lt-. N osi iii WO ire' 2 11 V C 117 1 ... 0 1 • ... I .4 ,ys es 0. M C • Ai fi .01 , • • •