The Statesman. — London, England, 1810-04-18 00:00:00

'• - TV* lit AT XV ivl APi . again have recourse (0 similar ineasures. It was a lways a bad plea fur aul no p o p u l ar • measure to support it by precedent, for precedents taken f r om bud times could, always be found ; • but be hoped the people would.amanfully resist all illegal an d u nconstitutional exercise of power, and if the people expressed a resolution to that effect, he Allister would be bald enough to attempt it. • lie siwuld not longer trespass upon th eir indulgence, o u t he exhorted them to persevere in the conduct rids which they commenced, and never permit the I tic precedent which had been made to become the i.sw. ['Grier of No! No I .] ' ' . • The Assembly dispersed with the gitstest order sill propriety of conduct. this petition was now.refitiod, that Homo o o _ be said to be shut agelist them ; it would be, in. 'deed, an act most violent against tie-People. In one point of the present petition he portleolarly concurred, the . prayer, for a reform; it was, is. deed, become highly •eeseertial ; the country, de. tired it, and the House needed it. [Hear, hear!) The CHANCELLOR. of the . EXCHEQUER thought ;there was much of the language in the peti. tint) which ought to have been omitted,' and' which was certainty calculated to produce 'very strong emotions in the breasts of those to whom it was addressed. There were some cases, however,. in which the forbearance of- the House might• be• most prudently exercised, and in his °pitiless this was one olthem. [flear, hear !] Such was also the case of Mr. Horne Tooke, which had been referred to. There was no doubt there were HOUSE OF LOItOS, Artw. 17. many expressions in the present petition, which the House might notice, if they were cap. The S o licitor-General for Scotland was beard at length iii tiously inclined ; he thought, however, it would the Kostairgh case. be the wisest plan to pass them over. ' There *as The lunkepers' Allowance Bill, the Irish Road Bill, and their • l't ents had a right s everol Private Bills, were brought op from the Commons, no dou bt cons i u (and had 4 were read the Int tune . exercised that right) to ask a re view of a rhea.' a '111.! Gocai Militia Bill, and the L•ical Militia Completion Gill, were reed the third time , and pa ed. sure which had pissed with a view ttra Reforna.- ss CIWELTY TO ANIMALS. . . They were now then only acting on a former'. Lord E rtskiyi ; p mess t es t w adi .. m this su bject . similar to precedent. lie hoped Gentlemen would give hini eid which passed the L ir Is fist S e s , s ion, with the addition ~•credit now for speaking his real sentiments, when „/ . clause, araki ► yt. tee iteward of toe Informer drpeu.•on Proof of the Greeity.pritetised tvein4 oialiil4l(l.4 and wau- he said that he thought the Petition ought to be to le . TMs Bib was read toe tii..4 time. received. • [hear, hear !) - The expression ta ...nue Private Bill s sweat eis.a.,:o toeir respective stages, • which he had most objeetibit was that in which Mitutrued• HOUSE OF c;U -, Araps 11. they reprobated . the derision of the House ; but . Still he did not think even that•woeld warrant the A Pecs-u prevented a Resurii of the Money expended in total rejection of the petition. He would, how. or p.ia-Odice.—Ordered to lie on the table. ever, act very di ff erently II he suppesed the petiO Ni r .,..d V Ste orivecl, t hat a lief of r.o: Evidence ult the Lone lion did not contain their 'real . sentiments,. tp ti ' p as au o,, c k wit,eu hid before the llinb In e.—Agreed . 0.) toe third traling of the Highgate Areaw a y B i ll b e i ng merely intended as a vehicle of". bn . ..,. ..,,,,i, Mr. PONSON BY didisof think" the Olden' Mr. C. ADAMS moved, as ao Amendment, that it should be mid on this day six tlis. contained matter which called for its rejection. Aber m A & r a few words fro l. P. )hare , rJ. Hall, and The constituent often petitioned. (+eon eigan It an mr.ii;artve,r, tar urigluol Illiiti.)11 Wibd carrell., and the lien Act of Parliament ; and why. should he, be . now 14a, lead a laird time and p•t-ped. , • Condemned for petitionincagainst a decision Of a wo e al ,,tion for the second reading of theillaebfristrs i t n Bill. a converimtlionedsaed bet„ erg Sir W. Corti+, air. separate branch of the begenature. a p l . s a ttl:ler, Alderman Cowie. Mr. Hiehen, Mr,•Wilipais, gu tge of the petition was p nu doubt, in some de. Mr . W. smith,. Sir 1. Timms, Sir C. Price._ and Mr. U. . - 6,W, and the House divided: Ayes 23 I :Noe, 07. 11 -- • -be Bill I grits reprehe nsible; but still that was in his opi. was tiiereture tit. ohm, not sufficient cause for its rejection. .. Vittif . 3llNSTliFt PETITION. M r. CANNING , t h oug h hi s opinion w as no , Lard COCIMA NE brought lip the Petition of posite to that of the lion. Gentleman•whe opened the Etecturs of Westminster (fur, which, ace the the debate, yet gave him credit for the spirit and proceedings of the W"tmenster M"etifigt in 111 pre' propriety with which he brought it forward. ceding column), QII that day assembled in Palace. Whatever form thequestion might hereafter take s yard, sod moved that it should he on the table. good must have been done by the dismission. IN l'itellots. Mr. WARD could nut consent to the looking over , the Petition, it was obvious that rine reception of what he considered a gross and glar. of its.objects was to provoke something of that in; violation of the dignity of that /I ouse. [ hew ' , itlikebtremark which had beep made, and that lieur!]• 1W elsicayetweto to t h i p, 4 „ r di ps o f the , h e 'drawers up of the. paper were trying theii F. t'tien, atil thouglit tliiritliko.fuetiwn, of the term i! si wegettelty how close they might run to actual " naionstitz ice," pamicul any ittdeeterods. •ne ' insult. ant it this Petition were thrown, out, trusted tenet the Petition *u 13 . 111 ." 114 9.4 44 !" 11 Y " 2 ' the consequence would be, that another would itted by the !louse. 43 . • . .: ' he presented, containing insult equally stroeg li Mi. MALL was totally inaaddilsbing s he gal., but wore dextrously concealed. Then the. kip Hbuse iiight be brought into .the diletaina..of Mr. CUItiVEN also objected to the language. having . received ode and rejected, another,,_ while tithe Petitiou, but thought it ought. nut. on that b oth conta i ne d t h e lame matter: .Thp .wo rd ' re-, "'mg tier be to tad altogether, Perhaps the Monstrance,' of which so inach,had beett . eaid, Xi) ; led wait snoop or to beef it fur the.present with. peared ru 'Slim *nut worth consOering :.,the only drawn, ht otdirsqlrat-after it -had been subjected phrase which really seemed ohtionistue web. that, so the revision of the Petitioners, it might be e. in *hich it wss said that the .flOtge iffeCed ftf,ill . • . , lan presented in ion objectionable terms. dignity to any class of the, pecte)g e . Thli NASA . Mr. LUSHINGTON sho s niht *kite, : though, the tr u e, wird trerefoie not ato be lotrininced into I leas ought to receive 4 liefril'ins It'll they wheel Petition : notwithstanding which, Itn . .flitliiiib,ts out bound to submit to ,An insult. . . . frnin the reasons already given, tt might be per.. Mr. WU aßa EA.Lr was.exe,cetnitgly sorry that 'bitted to lie no the table. . .. , aly• objection w hatevo . had' been raised to the N. - Mr W. SMITH was indeeed to. rise by the last. coition of the Petition'. lie wished to have heard the opinion of the Chancellutof the Ezehequ 'er tOrd .do s w u n f .• the Honourable Member who had juej The indignity was net spoken oriutbe us the subject before he gave his olds; but still , petition as arising on any act of the House. Lt. he hail nu hesitation in saying, that though he might be construed into the mode o f . arrert, eve: objected 'to: many of the phrases in which the cote(' by the Serjeant at Arms, on Sir - Francis Petition was . couched, yet' if the Hone 'on that account rejectedßurdett. He (Mr. Smith) gave the Hopi:tumble it, they would be led 1 11 .... , t u' a G e n tleman (Mfr. Ward), who opened the debate, user rioicot eci. The Petition lEr % lenedtid ' IN " l Stalficient,eredit for • his firmness; but the. highest . meeting' highly 'respectable., lee, Anil conducted in the must orderlysow e " Tebausec " dbi ll ,t° ' lermAit roe wisitlim and moderation was to be given t o . the two Hoye. Members. (Messrs. Ponsnnby .and. r!r. The grutind4, 'therefore, of its repotion VVilltbread) d iho supported the detail( the Petition, ihould not b e slight. [H ear n A o o bj ect i on had . 48 be —_:.... I n I ' iCCAYITCU.• t he conduct of the' HoUse there tn:n made to the intru4hictien. of .the word 6 re. was much room for praise on the present occasion; monstrance,' but the word itseitgonveyed' no in 41;nity ; it was used in every petition to the They had showed themselves not afraid' of being Crown, and such petition. was never Objected to thougirt cowards: th 7 m hid now acted in a an. tni that account. 'Eke Electors of Westmiester. adopted in certain late instances. It viral the ' which it was to e regretted they had not ecru indig nan t A t th e.arres t an d i mpr i sonment of .., . clad mc of their Reptesentatives.fot vihat., they consi.. of moderation and firmness that they were 4. 0 .- . ' 'the connexion which ought to subiist derd an " able, legal, and • coostittstional.negu7 thtirilirelhilluiree and the People. A for acts of tont:" so f a r it wa s w ith th e n a ma tt er o r op i. this kind' tweet(' go farther thins an* eierbise of Mon, a o ,l th e y hid a r i g h t t o express t h e i r op i. ohm :As to - the other 'point of theii complaint dowistfal authority. —the acquittal of Mr. Pet (evil and Lord tae.. • Mr. WHIT BREAD said, that he did. not eon. ceivethel word "'indignity" to have been appliedtietJagh, that also, as it appeared on the . Mi. nitts_ o f th a t H ouse , t h ey h a d a r i g h t to .ea •• ot th e proceedings of t h e Ho use ; y e t h e w i s hed n). cunt on ; and still more h a d th e y • vista to it to bo intdenittiod, that even if it had been to applied, it could oar 'in his 'mind, have elected tiprest their concurrence in the opinions so ahlx , theright of tbipletititin to lie'dn the tattle. npressed by the Speaker, to the great instruc.„ the nommen on li e r e cep tio n w oo ti t er; pet and. flea 01 the House, and. delight of the Country, and e i re h e 4;itho o tn : di e hg oe , • • which they might have seen faithfully reported to rile petition irm rece i ved, an d or de r ed to li e on the nation in the eery phrases in Which they were the :tablet • .. uttered. With respect. to the mode of executing • t he spgAK&R, ru de noise of !eget-proceed: the Speaker's warrant, after all that bad passed, ins eiv i err bile, in the same of :Sir .Frafteis - Bun he did not wonder that doubt. existed on She sub- deft. This paper differed •frdns tkaewhich lied lye!, Wes it surprising, after the ve r y arnbiguons, been opinion of .the • Attorney General ? - Was it sue. - before read from the Chair, only in (as far as ere could ascertain) theveants of - the parish iii Pnrieg that, wishing au th e y did, for reformation, woo, s ir F rancis Burdett , they should be indignant atth e imprisonment, and ' house steads. : -.. cus.lN , pm) for the reicose r • _o( übitsicat champion of The CIIASICELIAROf the I.o(Crf KIVU . Oat reformation ? ' Wila r II ~ surprisin g .th at wished Memei be to oonbide4Pretiously to die dii.l the should be ineenred it the conduct of mission eirnasecoAdserith tire entice . just - reed,'wlici.) Gattremenc in not calling out the civil powerprivileges 's involved thee a violation of t heir pe . , wild they had the military to meech by their in those proc_amlines I Thil air of the Speer wat t act of ~ the Hansel. atid the question might , "de? (Hee r! hear !) Was it surprising that the ley should say seats in that House were bought. r the interference of :: 41 external come, whethe .. _ , . . , int sold like cattle he a fair , when the assertion.. airt : l t urit_ _ ... L with i an act dent th e the II *as not Bill of flights.' '. - ' ' 4l l bean made even-in that House and not denied ?as '''''" n 43' the • • • , . The Rouse indeed, admittedthe fa ct , bit • Mr. ItHITEREAD . thought , s gOdained the impulatioa they loved the tit:a- ,Ilialkalegs, . i ,er's view of the oirt - 4? Right, 'is ei. . , it ' 4 , but Were indignant" at being called trai. f•abote iltliar. Yorke's. the . arrest , vas as ilg.t‘ lirs , 1 [throe ' hear!) The sabstance of the dose withotit the House, and' it Irot c : t el - coitrse, P en tion then ' could not be objected to, and fi lms day other act"( any o th er . 491 y m en. horly it ought not "to be rejected on *epeeist vikt - cgAricatit.ow.,*,,Aott,Ectua T'nerdy of the' terms in which it war, conveyed, opkihjeti t : hs ___ ___ „.; , 1 m, . , t m i ght, hereafter, bea cause for pet aceeding , IifVPQ ; .,44; fp.ma Fpr,. _*.ithisora of tko to the Prayer of the petition, but it could be, nu Sareerki!e se • r , Jilted 0 /51Pos _.,_ • Rith .thnje,: pound fur refusing it leave to lie on the table. The ,ealiliel r ,41. r , . wing5....,,10r Are 1001, bl'elker had, bit a former . odcailon IA ti, ethic* 04 'chg. • pgfripall4-4 91 4 4 . AN" . : 441 . 1 magn cen y ~ , .. Hoye ought- -tset # B . • ,•;914411104/164'104)144 thro w ° open to the petifigiref the piugitypiliiiit-o Pine tilir . IMPERIAL P RGI E NT. . . 1 Mr. NDAS moved • tor' lite iroduttion of , tevetorPapterl connected wittethe'Reteottis of the r iladia.Oonspany. , . . . . • , MR. HUNT. Mr. CALCRAFT rose, in perivance of the notice vrbieft lieled.given• dative to Mt: Hunt's eapalsioe. He..wist Proceeding. :to *state his rea sons, when was iuterro pod by, . ~ . . . . . • The SPE AKER, who desired to knew from the Serjeant at Arms whether ,the order of the Elouse on Mr. Hunt had been serred.'• [The Messenger who had beets' sent With the order was thencalled to the Bar. But on his ap. pearing nut to have made a sufficiently accurate enquiry for Mr. Hunt's residence, it was sug gested' to Mr. Caldron thit it would be advisable to defer his Motion till sic* enquiry w'as made.] Mr. CALCRAn mentioned that Mr.-nerd's wife told the Messenger that she had just received a letter from her husband', dated from Lisbon. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was of opinion; thin in so serious a charge, no step of . formality should be omitted. It was pro. ' per that the notice should be served and all search . made. . :, • Mr. CALCRAFT was willing to postpone his motion till after the recess, but in what he had done be had been guided by the Chair. The SPEAKER informed • the Hon. Member, that he: had been up to that tionsperfectly regu. tar. The Boole could now go do farther till search was made; but if it could be ascertained that Mr. Hunt had been in the country when this ,roeeeding commenced, and afterwards left it, this onduct would be a sufficient ground for their fur. ther proceeding. e 41 , sw.. - o.e . • - • ' Mr. CALCKAFT then Axed sois :the Thursday after after the recess fur his motiOiti.• * , ' LORD CllATlLtibi. . • • -Ms': 'WHIT BitEA a • wished . to ask the-Chan. ;eller of the Exchegoer oistsquestien.. The matter , of his gneatiep vres avetreoge middoubtfel to him... self, that h'e alnivistmiked . it now only to have it denied. 'Lord Chatham, as the ' nation ha'd.beert— given to understand, had• resigned his place about .twn months ago; but it was whispered that the re. sigualion was a 'feint; that he still held the office of MasteuGetteralpf the Ordnance; that he still possessed - the patronage ; and moreover that be' still condescended to receive the salary. Was this monstrous Story erne? Ccitild - it. be true? HeIMV. Whitbread:). was anxious, abeoluteli,anaious, for the creditottba.Ministry, to have it aesererettin . the negative. .... . .. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEtittift" stated, that Lord*Chatham stilt betd his 'Place. Till his patent was revoked, it was his duly to re. tisk? it.; -ape} the patent was not to. beteveked in pl.tccs so circurnstaapcd, until the appointment of a successor." :Pio, weighty buittiess which' occa. • pied Governtnent might account for tharsuccessor'a ant having -beets appointed 1. bur 'Lind . Cliathent did not issiat at slut inot. • , , ' ....... '- • 'Ar t W.ll L 1784.03). waa aatonis,hed. at Alsiailis., ecovery.., %hail . waa *this gross. deluaion to' .he. OrtictisU'On' the peilple of England t'Ainitii re.. 'signed hitt Pitteic.ttetholLiag (shis4at-'tittestater.. eat' of Ministers)t: be Ass witherevt cfroak-the. pahlk9ityAt the,eitellisSC bid Misr .nsS.thlLlC cOmp.lialtpti ? By a vile dnsion. For,vihei? the Minlitet gate the count ry •to • initAtitisa . that . 'Lord ChathislS liar Mired; - the . etifstralT wit the truth: The ,Minister had .not- been -Srithout , l ;opportunities of clearing . 1111 this .point ; for on being asked if, thia place, was filled up, his , con., Rant ansWer Waa l thatOovernment intendediefal' it .np-oi , soon at dosiible, thereby plainly inti mating:that it was viceot. Was this- to be abet. 'tete* , under.-the pretext of a patent place?. •The question had not been whether.4.erd.Chathans was ''aCabinet Minister ' but whether lie .Was Master-. General of the 'Ordnance. "If his' rernevat had not - beets perfectly understood; an uddrew would" have been moved to displace him.; There was one more question, that he only.required, to havkhis., full apPetite for wonders satisfied. .Did Lord Chatham Continue to receive his Salary ? The CHANCELLOR of. the EXCHEQUER professed thaehe could not 'be Certain on the point, as it 'vas not within his .effiee.- • Mr. A. COOPER. 014444, tAat .he had re. ctirmiliti salary . UP: to the last quarter. . Mi. AV4MITH•Moved the briber of the Day; toritiVß. tiport: WAIF tvidenee bittire the Cour: . .4i4W - Asa *.l.lothisa: Wet Ducks. • - , Spung_fyst,totativion.look e place on the subject 1 0 . JiWien Mr. Sluillt; Mv i .ll ; utntier, and the Chau. ' cell ot, or ate lit:help' er, Wk . ) . ea Preitied himself, as .n ados... aviverottniiadverle to` Sanctianivig .the yeatatt pitifitieed. '• • • ' ." :'.. • After Fern* 4rthOtgibiusgion,its which' Mr. W. Mr. llihkifit m 'sno Mr. Wilbetfaree, con tended that the atikjiis ihould go to a: Committee, and Mr. Msrr y at ittiollki *that the parties claim. .. log compensation had already been liberally cos. masted, *--- /'- .%.;...f:il. Pal . e 4 1 . . The SPEAKER felt .it,neopeenry ft, Once, that, ai the object of the massiere wit to atts3a larger •Comitensatien than the 'llect.elsffittittg affirmed, the consent of iheCrown erite . netessery. . It was welt knows that if thin* .itipt. original. applicatioa this;,* by Petition, far .e. .. 4:grapt, no step c odd be taken Without the • . lofhis Majesty. As this was an application fbr a further eitersiion of'tho "original compensation, and had not such consent, ~1t must be' obvious that such defect was fatal to the mesaure. If it was a declaratory actor as act to explain hnd amend the former act s it [night be entertained';, but proceeding to 'an extension of a former grant, without . petition consented -to by the Crown, it would have-the effect of giving the go.by to the fointi of Parliament, and the nem. sity of ..tl ' Leitoskkof ,his,llthjesti t and .was Roe vitiated:' Je,'7'4* ' . After s fevelittinis frbet Mr. • NT.' t MITH, ex :resting a hope that Abe fate of thii measure should net -prevent:Also parties from miming for.. ward again with -a declaratory act, and from Mrti ••Barham and thltliancellor of the . . Exchequer, thel i rerrettion wU lint and negatived withaut a — divisroa. iIie . ANCELtO .:' R of the EXtfiEctogß . ' • en . gawp %odes that he -"thestid tn-Morrow inoVei for i...ltaye to bring in a •mku to mike .thootfice of-Sur.[ ~. 111 au tho u. &IA lan of ifk a" Mr Mid . 11l 11. PC CC 7' in. he 4. art 1. dr so la JI au cc th or h, ()I Ai ut fn n. if a. li a n C'. tl tl tl h 1 a • 1 ,s r ' kee A e • . . ,vior of,cl.3o4inds 4-.6. 4 0e1Pr -Of nods find orests. The LORD" ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND. brought up the, Seotchludges' Salary Increase BA. add& was read a first time,.and ordered lobe read second Tined CI-morrow. . Mr. LUSHINGTON brought up the Report of the Committee 'respecting the Import of Sugars and Coffee. from Guitclaloupe. The Resolutions were agreed to, and a Bill ordered accordingly. The Report of the Committee of Supply was also brought up by Mr. Lushington, and agreed to. The House went into a Committee on the Lie • . of Man Trade Bill, when it was resolved, that the existing duties should cease and determine, and others, as per schedule, be substituted for them. The Report was ordered to be received to.mor.. row. The future consideration of the Stage Coach • BiU was put off, on the the motion of Sir John Sinclair, to this day fortnight. The Irish Coroner's Bill passed through a Com• mittee, and was ordered to be reported .to-mor. row. Mr. A. COOPER presented a copy of the In. 'structions' to the Board of Ordnance, which trim ordered to lie on. the table v and to be printed. Adjourned. LIST fit .T 1.114 14.4.101i-ITY AND - MINORITY ,WHO VOTIIII OS 1 4 / 1 111041011 OF FIR S. ROWILLY, FOS • Till DISCHILSOS OF ,SIL.JOSN (4•14 JOSS,. MAJORITY. Arbuthnot Fane, J. Macleod Ashhurnham Featherstone, S. J. Milton, Vise,. Astell ' Farquhar Manners, R. . Bagwell Fergusson, J. Mellish, W. Baker, P. W. Finch, Hon. E. : Milne Hinkel; Fitzgerald, W. Moncton, Hon. C. Barne Fitzhuglf• Alontagn ' M. Barry . Faster Murray, Lord J. Beach Foster Murray, Sir P. Beaumont Foster Murray, J. Benyon Foulkes, Newark, Lori Beresford, Lord G. Gascoyue . Owen, J. L. Beresford, J. C. Gibbs Puget, /lon. C. Beckwith Gipps Palmerston, Vac. Blatchford Glue:ford Parker Bonham Goulburne Peele Bouveria • Grant, C. Perceval Bowyer Grant, T. Phipps Bola Greenhouth •Plomer Britt Mae Hall, 11. Pole, W. BriMerick Hamilton, Sir C. Prendergast • Brooke, Lord Ilarbord, i ion. E. Porcheiter • ' Butler, E. Heathrote, I'. Ramshottom Butler, T. Henderson, A. • • Robirr•ou 1 Brute, J. Herbert, IL A. Rochfort Calvert, J. Hill, Sir George Rose • 'Calvert, N. Hincbin,brooke, Vs. Rose Campbell, A. Holmes, L. ' Ryder Clements Hope, Hon. C. Sebright Ciephale .Hug'san . Sheldon Clinton Hime, Sir A. Sitneoo Clinton ilouewa Oingleton Clive, H. Howard,Hon.F.G. Sloane Clive, W. Jacobs W. Smith, 11. Colqul‘orn lanes Smith, T. A. Flo Per, HOng ON.A-4akialolli t iV W. Cr - sPowtr!itt.Likrti C. ' per, E. S . 'Jocelyn, isc. 'Somerset, Lord A. coeWrill, - .A.13i T. Jodrell, H. • Stephen, J. . . • Cockerill,,Sir C - Jones, 6. Stirling Sir W. Croker -- liv' -J . • • 11 .' - ..8 11. • Davies. R. 'II. Kear ICI' • . Sytlintt, J. / M. Bldg,. W. Kiviton ' ' ThomPsoli, Sr T. En.itelibull Thoruton, R. 11hitbsow Laseelles .- TucfsoaY; C. tt , . . Lascellea . " ' Wullace,T. - rin,•Leed Loekbirt, A. •' ' Wart; it. - • J. •.. Locithart,'W, E. : itiFiqya . Loft, J. H: . I% h irt•in Ff. Long, at. 110 n. Cl .Wigrom • Louvaioe, Lord IV igrpm • Evelyn - Lowther, J. • Willoughbt Everett Lowther, Vise. Wilson Ellice' • • Lashington Windham i . llTre, A. H. Lygen ~ Wood, Sir. M. • • • " MINORITY. . ' ' Abeireetnitby;lle.l.Gower, B. . Parnell, if. •• • .Adatru, C.. . Cower, Lord G. L. Picnic, 11. • 'Adam, W. Grant; M. Pne:iin, C. I .Addington, Hn.J.R.Grant, Sir W. Pole, Sir C. • • • • . Anstrut her, Sir J. Grattan:Ri.Hon.H.Ponsonby !Banitigton, T. Greenhill, R. Powers, R. • • Baring, A. Hall, Sir J. Pritt ie. Hon. F. A, 'Etevalcl;*, C. Halsey, J. Pym,'F. Rlackburite, J. Hibbert, G. Quin, lion. W. Bourne S: Horner, F. Itchnilly, Sir S. Bensd;Ron. T. Howard, Hon. W. St. Aubyn, Sir Si '' - , Broftham, 11. Hughes, W. L. Scudamore, R. l', l Catft, 'J. Hume, W. H. Sharpe; R. f - .Campbell, D. Hitskisson, W. • Shipley, W. • Cahniae,Rt.Hon.G. Hutchinson, He: . C. Simpson, G. .Casendish, Lord G. Jackson, S. Smith, J. • Cayendish, W. Jekyll, J. . Smith, A. Cocbiane, Lord Lambe, Hon. W. Smith, W, Cocbranc,Hou. A. Lloyd, J. At. Symonds, T. P. Cotits, J'. • Longman, 0. Talbot, R. W. C•Aborae, R. • Madorks,.V A. Tarleton, B. • , Combe, 11. C. Manning, W. Taylor, W. Creevey T. Markham, J. Taylor, M. A. ' . Curtis, 81r W. . Marryat, J. Tempest, Sir D. V. Curwen, J. C. ' Martin, H. Thornton, 11. • Dent, J. . Maisle, Hen. Wc Tierney, Rt.ili. G. ' Dundas, flan. L. Maxwell, W. Tracey H. EMI; V. R. 'Milbank; Sir R. Tortogi, ' Sir T. ' • ,Ferguson, R. C. Mildmay, Oir R. Vernon, G. G. , 'Fitegirald; - Rigi*llliner,' Sir W. Ward,' Hoo. J. W. . • Roc V. ...t : ,,pilloore, F. verde,. O. L. .. . Fitzgeraid;bons - norp . eth, Lord Wariender, Sir G. • Fitzroy; Lord' •-.Morris, B. , Western, C. C. . Foley, A. Ilactlausid, J. Wharton, J. Folkstone, Vise. ' 'North, D..• Whitbiehd, g:* • Freemnantie, W.lll. Ord, W. Wilberforce, W: • ' Fuller,' 3. OsaulsrmiC, The. Williams, 0. Giles, D. —. , , Palmer, C. . . . • • .• TXLII.IIII. • Wyilis, l 'tit,. W. Ilaseiltee, herd A.' . ' Kr. Lyttleten iiieleenral oeherliseehere'paireda Alibi ,seee of the Mot*. ( a , . • ~i 1/' P.4OR,F. 1 Painifisi Afaitio ig:l l lwilil.o=7:4liitttei wits not expiated to /eters, kw.. - .... . moil the end of the prelim, atuathi.oe use 'oaing - ef t May. At two o'clock Tati t terds, they passed • thick/05410t DeWit t , Oa their 4'4 , 4 to COtopelinev attiiddd by t nuinerbus sot*: ' The prin tips! . tra. glaiwwforoiam of the 71ftstre •Frthicair were to ' sat 4 this day faccompeigaa. • :. . • 4 , By a decree of the 9,oth ult. his Majesty hai ep. - pointed Martini the DUke of badzsia Knight of '.. the Order of the Iron Croon: • '. • - '• . - • ••• ' ilia Beteileiday the Doke of Padua has . oirsidtol . : at Paris. • , ~.. • • ••• - • ia,, :Y• • • • His Serene klighti e 7silliArch.ChaatapOyAilio . , .. Eniplre' has teem* pee . miittiOn from the iii *. -• roi i to 'accept tiwilikte i r' of ft. Htephitii t ii 6h .. km *tens conferrett upon id& by the. Sin peter: of 0 . .4.ustrie. . 4 i. On the 2011 a 14.. she Specla.l Criminal Court, pf ,•,; • -the U pper Rhino grantol 'out, of , comtni . . , . - ....,•:‘ ... ..,,„ for trial against Fret/stns. 'out, Wimp?, a °sifter • 'cif AlthirCh, - in the isiti n dcPaitment, charged eitit' l / 4 ' haring: aided - the Spanish insargelets, and bor.. - ' arose %Wail /Mace. . .. ~i.. . :. .. - ' • ' •• •••• • • t% . Vet _ Mil ,