The British Press; or, Morning Literary Advertiser. — London, England, 1807-11-27 00:00:00

not be put 01•011.Nilm'EarWaothOieount of the absence of a 'hti. Ciiullifd, a trialerikrffitness, now resident in Paris. In answer to a question from The Court. it ap peared, that there was no probability Or Gfie of the arrival of the.withess, in this country; 'oilgtie evi dence. Mr. Gaaaow said a few words against the mo tion. sad the Court were of opinion, that no ad vantage could arise from the delay sought for, and that it was quite out of the Usual course of praftice, and inconsistent with farmer precedent.—Rule re fused. WEST INDIA DOCKS. ussisitscis, •nosirott, mad co. a. PRE COMMA. StAILATIOR COMMISSION/11. The Aerottere-Getertet ;hewed cause why a Rule obtained by Mr. Serjeant Besr, for a new nix% should not ,e made abselnte. He grounded his elsjeaion on the alt of the 39th of GI O. 111. ch. fin, sec. 101, which he said had evidently fixed the time for making the valuation of the property, for which c.mpensation was to be made, for !Asses arising U. 411 Or. building of the West India Docks. The e«..rtsi words of that clause were, that compensa tion was to be made to those persons whose pro perty might become " less valuable than it is at present." He conceived that the words "at present," meant now." that is, the time at which the au was passing. It appeared, therefore, that the instruaion given by the Recorder to the Jury was perfectly correct, in excluding that evi dence which related to the alleged probable value of the property, subsea uent to the passing of the set. Were he to take forte whole days in arguing this point, he could not state any thing stronger, or more expressly convincing than this, to shew that the Plaintiffs were not wsll•grounded in their claims. Mr. Galeow and Mr. Dame, ea also said a few words upon the sums side. Mr. Serjeant Besr, in support of the Rule, urged, with great force, his former arguments upoa this subject. He maintained that the act had not pro vided in express terms how the valuation was to be accomplished. It evidently appeared, that the value of the Plaintiffs' property was io a progressive state of increase, in proportion to the imports of Weer India commodities into this country. He Illustrated this position, by stating what would have Men the cori.equeuce, had the Plaintiffs been wish ing to sell their property. or to grant a lease thereof. They certainly, in that care, would have looked forward to the probable increase of future years. Mr. PAIR followed. upon the same side, and argued, that by the Igeth Seaion of the Alt. it was expressly provided, that no pers n wesuoorraite a claim until three years after notice 'Owen of Abe opening of the Docks. in order that they might know whether or nct theft prOperty was to be ren dered left valuable by their operation. The Docks being opened in the year 180%. the Plaintiffs could net by this Seaton mike their claim till the year 1395. Now, in what eituazion, he asked. dad this place them ? They were to remain out of the value of their property from the year 1:99, 1805. This evideotiy sheaved that the *tea Like of the ProOorte, in the year 11799, was-to be estimated by such evidence as could-rile- produced, as to its *aloe at a subsequent p..iod, remote from the pass ing of this Aft. At all events, there was eathin in the Aft which expressly excluded the known and LI rule of valuing property or of excluding probable grounds of incie oar, is was dime io ether cas.:s. suppose that it had happened at the time of passing the AEI, that the Plaintiffs' premises had tumbled down, were they, in that case, to wi tness their value according to the then existing cur. tasestances ? Would it nut then have been reasan able to have taken into consideratide itre probable increase that wit likely to arise hoectter rebuilding of them! Certainly it would ; and noon the same irrlndS it Was but fair and reasonable to take into the computat:nn thcse subsequent years, which were likely to estate an increased value to tne Plaintiff's property. • The Corse were of opinion that this matter was Of great weportance, and as they wale li/LIOUS to lay down a rule that iroeld preclude any subse quent correction, they slthald take some little time .11P 40 consider it. la out Paw of yegter.lay we par a Lei, Reix.rt of the Nllow ing Cue I OODLAL end OTHERS POLDER° and or. ueltS. Mk. NTT'S DEETS. LIPS ouutiencs. Title was an aelion of debt on a Policy of Insur ance under seal for 5001. with the Pelican Office, upon the life of Mr. Pitt, then warranted under the age of lorry-six. 1 he Declaration stated the Policj, that doe Plaintiffs paid fifteen guineas premium fur irstoance. fir a year, from the tsth of November. Iso4, that they also paid the same sum for WO, and that afterwards, to wit, on the 25i of Jaettanft 1806, and while the policy was in force, Mr. Pot died, and notice of his death was given to the Of ice ; that thiee months had since elapsed ; that Mr. Pat had nut been out of the Elvin of Europe, nor ei gaged in the military or naval service of His Ma jzity ; that be was not forty-six years of age whto the policy was effected, and that the flaintsffs were satire Ulf in his lite. to the amount of the t.:m in sert!, arid upwards, by Sting creditors upon him cur a large- sum of money. To this Defendants pleaded, first, that they owed nothing; secondly, that the Plaintiffs were not interested in Mt. Pitt's life ; thirdly, that the IIALEVIS of the Plaintiffs in the policy was a debt due and owing from Mr. Pitt; that after his death. and before the exhibitino of the bill of the Plaintiffs, the debt was ti.t:ci by John Earl of Chatham, and tie Bishop of Lincoln, the execetors of Mr. Pitt. The Plaintiffs replied, protesting that the int was not such as was stated, that they were not duly paid by the said Erecutoss, in the manner and form, kr. and hint was joined on the former Pleas. Tee Defendants paid 511. 10s. into Court on account of ' the pretniums. Ott the trial the policy was proved, and that Mr. Pitt died's' stated above, and had not broken the terms of the policy, in t tie reweg above seated, by going oat of Europe, or Seplirk ie. Mejesty in any nsilitary or naval capacity) smith that-notice was Fieen of his death, as requited. That Mr. Pitt died Indebted t.. the PliOtifFs. and that on the Gtls of Maidl, 1506, bis seQnwts piid to the Plaintiffs Mt. 1,1091. Its. 6J. ant, or, the monies granted by Par- Jimnent, as in full lev their debt. The question was, whethef the Plaintiffs were en titled to recover ? Lord Er.t.ananacioon stated, that it was *lslay, agrted, that a policy of insurance, such as is valid under the statute of Geo. It. is a centred of indem nity metcly against any loss by 'the event insured againbt, and viilatever removes the lose, or dimi nishes it, in the happening of the event, affects the right of the party to recover under such insurance. —ln this case the Plaintiffs were only interested in respea of tti; debt, - the prospeß of recovering which might be affeded bythe life or death of Mr. Pitt.— Being paid that debt, no matter how or from what fend, they could claim no indemnity. He there fore concluded, Olat a Ter.:l4ft must be entered for the Defendant on the first and third issnes, and for the Plaintiffs on the second, by which the Plaintiffs have in fad lost their suit. __ M . COURT OF COMOP ttaltA3—.Nov. 26. Er-parte h 4 as ts. Serjeant Saginaw spewed cause 1011 y the Rale -Obtained in this case shoull not be made absolute. it was an application mode by a Mr. James Harris, the administrator of his father, to have an order front the Court, imperative on a Mr. Crook, an a Attorney of that Court, to deliver up to him certain 'Bile deeds. belonging to the property of which he was the sole administrator, and to refer Crook's bill of costs against Harris, to the Prothow•tary. The . Learned Serjeant did not conceive the Rage within the jut isclidion of the Court, Maar:men lis it referred to a division **property, only to be settled either by a bill in Chancery, or a reference between the parties. It involved a great many considerations esstirely out of the purview of the Ccuri ; such as the , accounts between A Mr. Begg, the administrator, daring the minority of the present existing admi nistrator, &c. The atfiadavits on both sides were eatrem-ly voluminous ; and it was contended, by Serjeant VAOIIII/W, that Harris having granted a Warrant of Attorney to Mr. Crook, for a certain sum, he was justified in calling upon the discretion of their Lordship, to order even that single item to be re ferred to the Prothonotary. After the iistrocluttroo of a variety of cartons stems, totally irrelevant to the question immem atety before thts Can't, but of peculiar importance to the parties, with respe& to their different interests in a general adjustment of their clams, The Couar oid not conceive the mere execution of a Warrant of Attorney, and in rime,' Crook was not considered as the agent of Harris, as sufficient to call upon them to intertere. It, therefore, atter a strenuous admonition to All toe parties, to refer their different claims to some Gentleman at the Chancery Bar, refused to make the Rule absolute, and discharged the motion wises cost.. niece's, /girder of Chu:, o. SA WM& Seejeant Btsv ciewed cause against the rule why the award of the arbitrator, in tuts action, should not be' set aside. The application against tne award, rested upon toe aa.aavit of a Air. Scrivens, a =eschew s clerk. who 6'st tom. upon himself to oppose the grouads'upon whit:, t e ar bitrator (Mr. Seijeant Room:wan.) l.ad Jetennsi.ed to male the award, and next so suppose that he had come to an ergo:leaner - amiss:cm, is oppramion to the law of the case. Upon this optima of Mr. Striven*, the Court was called upon to set aside an award, although there was. no fact or evsdence which could kind . ): the Court to entertain the opinion, that the determination was either made upon an improper interpretation of the law of the ca.e, or upon the assumption of any fad, which, if not admissible, would have induced the arbitrator to have made a different decision. Toere was also another ground opal which it was sought to set aside this award. It appeared from In. affidavit * Striven, that in the adjustment of tile accounts betties:a the Baakrup:. Bunn, woo was an in.arance broker, and the Detendaut, Barnes. who wee an trlder-ariter, that Bunn was made a debtor to the amount ot lihn. upon the ship 4one, which I had been captured. The tad was, that the Defendant was authorised to make assurances upon this ship ; and on his passing Mr. Bunn, its Lloyd's coder hou,e, that path man told the alendant he would be glad to take a line upon the ship Arose, at the pre ;morn diet day given, which was at the rate of fifteen guineas for every hundred. Mr. Barnes • told him his wish should be compiled with ; but in the multiplicity of the Detendant's concerus, it so happened that he totally forgot his promise to Mr. Senn. On meeting him soon :the'', tbe Defendant found him dissatisfied at toe shsappeintroent, and th.nking himself bound in honour, he traosterred an insurance, made in the name of Lee, at 7 per cant. and over which "bornes had, by a Power of Attor ney, Lull authority, to Mr. Bunn, at fifteen gutneall for the hundred. This transaction. Mr. bcnvens thought, eonstonted a re-insnraoce, and the Court was called upon to set aside she award upon thia and. Sat it *either Met the spirit nor the letter of the 19th of George 11. That st.stutera . ' re-insurances, was for the purpose of Aneekitig a l itre spirit of gambling, and went to guard against a man taking an insurance at a very hign prennem, and ° diems, by a central with another person. at a lower premium, putting a sum of money into his pocket,l without being liable to any risk. The fats in the present inuance were diredly 'contrary ; it was merely a substitution of Mr. Bunit's name for Mr. Lee's, increasing the premium from seven to fitteen per cent. But by the letter of that "Statute, in °ids!. to constitute a re-insurance,it wainecessai y that two assurances should be made,that is, that there should be first a contract between the assurer and the per son taking the assurance, and then a second policy between the latter and the third person, with whom be contrafts, for the purpose of indemnifying him self from any risk. Upon these grounds he, (the Learned Serjeant,) considered it impossible for the 11l Court to set aside the award. Serjeant Olis cow followed on the same side, and contended, t►at it wits necessary, before the award could be set aside, to thew either that the arbitrator bad exceeded his jurisdielioa, or that time was a :instatement of the fads. with which, if the ar bitrator had been Acquainted, he would have made a different 'decision. Indeed these was no other ground to doubt the propriety of this award than the Mete opinion of this Mr, Scri►ens, and Ish exer.. upon this Mad him of other , E......, ...q.,, language of isee e164370i pat. .._ ___ . place. ' that be would teach the Judges law, and the ps religioo." . iierjeant B•t LIT ctiritended. that there was no lagal evidence of the contra& between Barnes and Bunn. He wishsd to know, uuder the present cit. cumstances, to whom the Assurer WAS to come for his demand ? Nut upon Bunn but upon Lees, and then at course his claim would be liquidated out of the pocket of the Defendant. Could Barnes, in such case, maintain an affirm against Bunn ? Cer tainly not. The affidavit of Scrivens went to prove that the claim of the Defendant, standing . alone on that inadmissible contra}, had hem received in evi dence by the arbitrator. It could not be admitted as a sri-If, which was only across adtion ; and as, from its nature, it could not maintain the cue. so it was imposvible to have it as a set-off allowed. In his opinion a reassurance did not depend upon the qua,logne of the premium, but it was merely a ques tion, wheth-r the Defendant, by insuring first at a certain premium, and afterwards making a sub centre.), by which he indemnified himself, did not subed himself to the penalties of a re assuran c e the COURT, although it did nut judicially give an opinion, whether, under such a contra 1, the Defendant could recover against Bunn. and though there WAS something subtle and curious in the pe seta circumstances, fret was decidedly agreed, that it was not a re-insurance. Besides, there was no proof before them. impeaching the award, and therefore the Cosa could not, in a question, where a general reference was made, and where the claim, m conscieuce and equity, was just, set tee award aside. The motion was discharFed without costs. POLICE. al ANS1011.1110M• A porter of the name of Ring, in the employ of Messrs. Barden. of Greco-church-street, was charged. before the Loan Ma Volt, with stealing a paper fhll of nails, vetoed at 2.; 6d. which was found in his possession, and which he confessed to have stolen. He was committed for trial. Lawrence ration, porter to Messrs. Bell and Co. St. Martin's-lane, Cannon street, was committed for trial, for stealing seven oil-stones, value 11. as. the property of his employers. A man of the- name of Rashest, was charged with picking the pocket ofJamer"Scofield, a private soldier in the 7th Royal Veteran Battalion, of his poeket•book, containing 81. in bank notes. It appeared that Scofield, and his comrade An del ton, had received the notes in question, which were their joint property, as payment for prize. money due to them ; anJ, as they were passing throegh the hiiiiories, the Prisoner, in company with 'three or four other persons, overtook them, when he thirst his hand Into Scofield's pocket, and whipped out the pocket-book, which, it is supposed, he contrived to slip to some of his gang. Scofield laid hold of him but, after some struggling, he got away. The soldiers immediately pursued, and took him into custody. 'He was iota, t y searched. hut no pocket-ouok was fou;.d in Lis pu.. session.--41e was remanded for a second era 'lunation. • COW-ITRIZT• Yesterday 'fee! Isaaae, the wealthy Jew of &Ms mouth, was brought before Mr. Haas. for re.exa minatine, charged on the oath of Xlehard Smith, Esq. and ethers, with feloniously uttering and pub lishing as true, at Greenwich, in the counreof Kent, a certain tale, torged, and counterfeited certificate, purporting to be the certificate of the Honourable Courtney Boyle. Captain of His Majetty's el the Ki 7 al WrYinore, and Robert rooag, Lieutenant of the seine tap. in orderr to receive certain prize money due to Thomas Seandling, who had satved on hoard His Majesty's ship thle Triaraph, with as intent to defraud the Comtnissioners and Gover nors of the Royal Ho'pitel at Greenwich, be well ' knowing the same to be false, forged, and counter. fen. Richard Smith. E:q. the Clerk of the Cheeque at Greenwich, said, that the Prisoner had been fee some time surpetfird of forging seamen's certifi cates, in consequence of which every possible atten tion and examination were given to every Lire tilieate that come from him. • On the twenty& ninth day of September last be received from . the Prisoner, by the post, an order, purpartin4 to • be the order of Thomas Scandling, of His hlaiestyls ship. if eye! Iralhista, at Spithead, *n.l to I'M tall mark of !homes Scandling, for u th payment tot 41 Prisoner. er order, his share t f the Trim-brooey, when on board the Trinntpk, ice tee it,,,ser, Sea Raphael, and ti lime, under Admiral bur Robert Calder, in the West-ladies, at his office in Green wich. It came in an inelosuist, purporting to be signed by W.•H. Preston, clerk to Mr. Peacock, of Clepent's Inc. agent to the Prisoner. He strongly suspected the orcerro be false, forged, and counter feit, and that the Prisoner forged it. tie further stated, that on the 17th day of September, a young man, who said his name was Thomas Scandling, sad that he had served on board the lrsenspit, came to him at his office at Greenwich, and Chtimedtlere payment of some prize-mosey, which, be said, was due to him, for captures made by the Triumph, and on bang shown the slid order, in favour of o.* sorter, which had been seat for payment by Mau i Peacock. the Prisoner's agent. Seandling deelaridi he had not signed it, or given any order for the payment of his prize-money ; asd the day the envier ficate purported to be steed by Thomas Scandling, be was at Liverpool. • Mr. Peacock proved, that the order, purporting to be signed by Thomas Scandling, which he pre sented to Mr. Smith at Greenwich, was the same I . that he received from the Prisoner at Portico. He believed the fining up of the orders to be in the band-writing of the Prisoner; and the signature of Thomas Carey was also in the hase-wi lung of the Prisoner. The Hon. Courtney Boyle, Captain of His Ma lesty's ship naval with., now lying at Brit. bead, said, that the signature 6. C. Boyle" to the 'tertificate amazed to the order of Thomas Scar& ling. , aothorising Joel Isaacs to receive Thomas licandling's prize-money, doe to bins for services as a boy oil board His Majesty's ship the Triamix6, for the capture of prises. was not his hand-writing. beuterwat Youug, of the keeet frfklem, eased, that the signature of Robert Yonag to Thomas Standling% order, purporiin. tp b e hi s s i gnature, was a forgery. Jeremiah Craymore, of Liverpool, proved, that Thomas Standing; lodged at his Norse from the 14th of September to the 24th rn a, ; so th at I it was impose ble he could have signed the order. 1 as it purported to be signed on the 24th ea, of Sep. tember, at w:tich time he was at Liverpool. William Adki 1.. the OlEcer, said, be took the ! Prisoner 'nto custody at his house, at P• rt.mouth. on the Ist day of °Sober, at which tim. he con. fessed to him, that, after the order had hem re.. lotted for Captain Boyle's signature, Scandliog, on the same day,• called on him, and requested to be paid his prize-money, (at which tim? Scard ing was at Liverpool), and that be told trim he could not have it, as the order had been returned for want of Captain Boyle's signstore ; that Seandling took the order, and. in a short time, reword wit+, it, purporting to be signed by the Captain. This, of course was impossible. The Prisoner was fully committe t for trial at the ensuing Assizes for the county ,TlCmt. ft !;l ' _ 1440r4LiMill'LLIGdACE. PORTSMOUTH. NOT. 23. Arrived the his, of .';0 gun+, Captain Laugharne, bearing Vice-Admiral Holloway's Rig, tad the Bleuem sloop, Captain Not, with a salall vinvoy from Newfoundland. Also the hides, —, from Madras, (a single shi r r,) ; and the For cutter, from Lisbon : she let the Tagus on the 15th instant, at eh - ch time the Portuguese had sevtn sail of the line, tsdo frigates, and a schooner, ready for sea. On the 9:h instant, two Russian men of war Arrived in the Tagus, from Gibraltar ; and irt the 11th, three sail more and •wo trigates t also a Portuguese frigate and a merchantman•, from the Brazils, richly Wen. PLY M , VTlfg NOV. 24. Came in the Affikeenne Fr-neh lugger pivateer. prise to Plis Majesty's ship 1 4 / 1 1111 • e ; sad ('barrette. Ltvell, from Ttuerife, detained by the /ha pti• Vatteer. DIAL, NOV. SS. Arrived His Majesty's ships Osprey and ft.valise, with several gun-brigs. from off tilt French cos, ; also several outward bound vessels from the rirtr, and remain in the DJerns, with the ships as per last.—Wind S.W. MILETII26III OF CREDITORS AT GUILDHALL. TIMM, aMI N N. Jan Kennion the eider, and John Kennion be younger, Nicholas.lane, London, broker. . 3 1 Kis.nu e l I.aao Samuels, Prescott.itrett, Goodman s. Fields, merchant • . . 3 10 James Granites, Plymouth...lock, Devonshire, victim/. let - . . - / 1 James Lit/nerd, Deptford, Kant, cbteseasonger . 3 111 Owen Macdona;h, Albany Tavern, Westminster, victualler - - - - S 12 Janie. Askew and William Wright, New Bridge street, Rlackfriars, London, straw hat manufacturers - 3 le William Lewis, Fond-street, woollen-duper - S 11l James Potter, High-Holborn, baker . - 3 II Jahn Richardson, Remerset.street, Goodman's Fields. mathematical instrument.maker - - 3 10 William Layton Winter, Arbton-place, Sicklier's. read. Surrey, statautter - . 2 4excidat Cuthbert, Thomas Ivooke, and George Robert Cuthbert. Gutter lane, London, merchants 2 I übert dilation, Themas-street, Hoisleydown, Surrey, sprint merchnnt • - - 2 Saudis Irri.ard Lelia, Great Alio-West, Middlesex, merchaat . - - 2 Jeremiah Appleby, Chatham, Kent, linets-dract - $ 1 Chnstepher PIM, Catherine-court, Tewer.hill, Lon don, moorhens - George Allan, Fenchurch-street' London, withal. sterte - . . - - 1 john Albans., Wars. Hesdrirdshire. loarge.racter - 1 1 George Wake, Morpetli. Noithuroberland, hewer - 1 10 'William Watl, Oxford-street, Middlesex, hosier - 110 Thomas Dowell, jun. Rodney-court, Hulywell.mount, Middlesex, basket and pedlar - - 1 1 DIVMENDS. Francis Henry Chrimin,C4lege- Lon Jon„ mer chant - 10 John Soler?, Xa.t Retford, NottinAamshire, gamer - 10 John Storey Piitcbard, late of Wiginoro-street. Carer grocer and confectioner . 1 10 John Swan, Wapping.ssall, hliddlesex, mast and block-maker - 10 CERTIFICATES. John liellyeeke, of Brixton-row, in the county of Sutter, deafen and chapman. Lae, Degraves, ut Chcapside, in the city of Leaden, and of Msnchester, in the county of Lanc.stcr, and Thomas 111141. bridge, of Manchester, warehooaernen, dealeis and chip- Thomas Bainbridge, of Manchester, waseboasernaii, rimier and chai:lan. Hi..nry Reale, late of Liverpool, in the county of Lancaster. rn-reliant. Thomas Parsons, late of the city of Rath, in the county of So merset, leatber.breeches-nsaker, dealer sad chapmaii. TRICE OF STOCKS YESTERDAY Dank Stock 3 per Cent. Reduced 3 per Cent. Consols 4 per Cent. 5 per Cent. Navy Lung Ann. Irish 5 per Cent 931 India Stock ... 17$ 71 51 Ditto Ronda par. h. dim. Exchequer Bills Criomda for opening T. INSff,StemdtAteeker, 4, Corolla!, and 2, CIIIIIII3f-CYCIM BIRTH. Yesterday, the Lady of Celia Douglas, E.q of IrrsderieVa. Ice, of a daughter. MARRIAGES. Friday hut, at Press, Salop, the Res. Edward !Willie. _ . 4 daughter OR A. M. Vicar of that platy, r Mies Ohm Hill, third _ of John HUI, fel late M. P. for Sliseesebery. On Wednesday, at Clifton ' by die Icy. Junes Datibenyi, Eduard Simpson, Eel. of Henbury, Oloucesterilore to Mao Joanna Deubenr. •oingest daughter of the Lite Cirgrge Deer beet', E.q. of Rediand. DEATHS. On Monday evening last, at his Ileum in the Crescent, Shrerralsury, Richard Sake, Esq. of Trafuaney, in the cuunty of Montgomery, aged 57 years. At Lochgilphead, 4th Instant, Alexander Bowes, Esq. Col lector of Excise fur the district of Argyll. On Saturday, at an advaaced age, at his house at Game& well, near Swirdett, Sisson Weyer., Esq. MGM WATER, THIS DAT, AT LONDON-BRIDGZ. Morn. o..min. If I Ems., .. min. aftinre.l2. LONDON ..—PelatiNi by G. DAVIDSON, Ns. 17, Debt. . court Roe Ahem. Cower tardoo sod published at th e Offie;, hio ifa Seek of St. etetaiegt Church. Strand. W.STUCh. of No. 7, Now 11•160}noset, Long-Acre -.- Order, de los tho Pa, u, sett to the kktsce, (past 1.111, vii! to duly %Matted tv. ~ , '.~.~.,, lie 81171 1 411 TI T HIS -1-3 Their -Tl The Seras yooph Ore pi -ter • M: Di Mountain; Ghita, Mre• 1 la Act 1. r• A raor Fro Aa 11. Mr mg • " by Mr. Ater which e The Ore The Chan lirun, Mr. Mt. Pignut+ outnisotib ; A W" To-m xrt , Th o u r, Mr.;. THE T HIS .1. will 1 LeaNl% b4r. M popes r.,... 1 • 4 i Ch.wto M e WI. IMift bit I Mope' T Motivair Mr. Baler Grirnaidi To morn Leaden a • Gand M B! the Art I TH I sight. .n spekon by mast bubo rime. will .NEVI it ran dm I dentlbei I whelly, called Th. recters—C Muter D Feexamore sod Mary aoices—.• CountryC. sad C. ti Hart .tutt A Kt's' , se■ Hu. Tk OD woo. an , m , oa, d WWI Cita perf.ri Orreperee4 IFNI /ft initial by bac am *LACKS 11111thooa, blachtnel ►y Mr. Al •etweeni • buithapi f•e Hand, Mean Dane Place. I N Three Hal I% put 13,.0ks Coffee, t T AI In pninrloutl iages :—. a ihitf is bad inol and give only at a Fleet•an bed, COI aliacount quantity .Gal sios.c; - 1 .~ i z i I i The these it Propert Pr*Mt (1 have el ..t ages Padua the Li 1%;;;M the he posed t awl IN coedit.' Tad 0.61111 Half.., Qua,