The Statesman. — London, England, 1822-04-18 00:00:00

.- ~- •-•., • . : IMP ul~r~ P.4ll6l.cum.ntr. HOUSE OF COMMONS, AViu 17. The Hoarse met rMs day, pastime to adjournment.' )tr. MAT/CARP (from the Southwark Cows of iii‘ • stolpremeated a Return pursuant to au ileeduri-lir Hnn+e.-: (Merest to lie on the table. On IN.' motion of Dr. PHILLI/HORB. the Aprolut. remlipo of the Hill for the amendment of the Illardir A. es filed for Fritts,' the Stith last. Mr. W. DUNDAS presented a petition from the Coe pnratina of Caatile-makers in iMinbargb, praying a re peal ash* Tam nn Candle'. The wend reading Of the Warrant of Attoroefs Bill was postponed to Monday next. M e , LER presented a petition from the town of New Poe., in the county of Wexford, praying for the repeal of the Window Tat. Mr. ROHARTS presented a petition from the Unita te...eten, praying for an sites-sties the Mar-1 riapvAct. to ar e . POULETT presented a petition n fpus Rammed t' -.le, in favour of the Hill for the Recovery of Small Debts. s similar petition we. p tad from Rerrowgate.— Ordered to lie nn the table. lewd A. HAMILTON presented a petitier from the Corporation of Perth against the Hill hefiire the House far the Reform of Royal Scottish Burghs. Mr. KENNEDY presented a petition front the Coe' poratinn of the town of Ayr, to the same effect.—Onlst , ed to lie on the table. Sir R. SHAW presented s petition from &peek* St. Andrew, in the city of Wake. praying Met the on Windows might he repealed. isatead of the Tat os Malt. He also p tad a petition from the parish of St. Nichol**, in the same city, to the same effeet.—Or• dered to lie on the table. Mr. ALLAN gave notice that on Thursday. May 16, he would move to refer to a Committee the lest Re port on the subject of Welsh Judieatare. Mr C..W. WYNN postponed the seemed reading of the Yorkshire Election Poll Hill to the 29th inst. Mr. HUME, seeing the Nohle Martians (Loodoa derry) In his place. wished to know if he bad any ols jection to the production of certain papers relative to the Irish Civil List. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY was not pre- I rated at the moment to give the Hon. lientleman a &d -tin answer. entMl2l tL Law. . • Mt. 11. dENNET said that be rout. pursuant to , tice he had given, to call the attention of the House to certain parts of the Criminal Law, relative to accessa ries before the fart in cases of felony. He would not detain the House by many obserrations on the subject. as file teecesaity of a revision of the law was overally admitted, not only by the voice of the public, bat by persons who had passed all their lives In the admiaiir twine of justice. The punisionest at present was at seri? di.propbrtioned to the offence of an accessary be fore the fact, in cases of murder and of larceny. The utmost extent of punishment in such cases allowed, was th it of twelve months imprisonment. He proposed to tier to the Courts time power of sentencing to a longer inmerisonnsest, or to transportation. The offence of wincing others to commit crime was not sufficiently marked. or an adequate punishment recognised. From the inefficiency of the law is this respect. the offenders in a late case were suffered to escape. He alluded to a jeweller in Arundel-street in the Strand, being lately ro..bell of property to the amount of NW A had let in the thieves, had assisted is the robbery. and saes Hulas in removing the property. but from the for es of evidence, no proofs could be sufficiently given of these facts, on which the principals could be con victed, and they and the servant were all let loose upon society again. lie would conclude, by moving for leave to !trios in a Bill to amend the laws against accessories before time fart in certain frlonies.—Lesve was greeted. Time Hon. Gentleman then said, that he considered the laws respecting the crime of manslaughter to be equally defective. The punishment was not in many cases proportioned to the magnitude of the offence. He alluded to the persons who were lately convicted of throwing a man from a window of a honse of ill-fame, and who were sentenced to twelve months imprisonment. Ile concluded, by moving for leave to bring in a Bill to emend the laws respecting the punishment in cases of Dl mnslaughter. 3lr. C. W. WYNN agreed io the propriety of a revi sion of time law : there was no offence an ill defined as that of massleughter. There was no equality of crime in the ease of a wan being accidentally killed in a scuffle, and that of a deliberate murder of an officer in case of , where the least informality took place; ' and vet fur both these offences so disproportioned, there v..* only time same measure of punishment—that of 12 moths. He cordially agreed in the principle of the motion. Lean was granted. REP,IIIIT OP Tile AGRICULTURAL COMMITTEE. The 51arquess of LONDONDERRY postponed his motion on this Report until Friday the 26th inst. Lord BELGRAVE presented a petition from the town of Chester, in favour of the Bill before the House for the Recovery of Debts under Fifteen Pounds.—Ordered to be printed. AGRICULTURAL DISTRESS. Sir THOMAS LETHBRIDGE said that it was hie painful duty to present a petition complaining of severe distress, and praying for the attention of the house to their relief, from time occupiers of land in a parish in the county of Somerset. The petitioners prayed for the les seni-g of the burdens of taxation as far as it was prac ticable. They stated that they had read the printed re port of time Agricultural Committee with much disap pointment. They disapproved of the scale of imports tine prices recommended in that Report; if adopted, it would be more detrimental than beneficial to them. They trusted that inquiry would lead the house to see the necessity of adopting further prohibitory measures with respect to the importation of grain. 'I hey stated, from a calculation winch they ha,' made, that a varia tion in time price of corn of one shilling the bushel, was meal to the total rental of all time arable land in time kingdom. They considered the average produce per acre t o b e 21t hmishelr, an.l on the calculation of one shil• ling on each bushel, they adopted time conclusion that its sw oon. was equal to time rental of all the arable land. which was about 12 per cent. lie could not vouch fur time accuracy et this statement, as he had not goneinto its examination ; but he considered it a strong proof how deeply the people thought on these subjects. and how outdo their minds were interested in them. They stated, that unless the soil was protected in proportion to the taxes, both Parliamentary and local, they would be un able to go on any longer in its Winter. *They attributed a great proportion of the present distress to the altera lion in the value of the currency. an-I complained that in their part of the country they suffered a great deal by the want of a sufficient circulating medium. He found it moat painful to call the attention of the lonise so frequently to this subject, but the necessity of time case furred I • to do so. He contended that something should be done, and that immediately, to lessen the bulk of time dis•ress which now existedlroin one end of the empire to the other. He had heard it said, that over prodnetinn was the cause of the pressure on the Agri cultural interests ; he did not hear at the same time ac hoowledged, that, which he believed to be the cause, over importation, not only from Ireland, which he viewed only as a county, but from militant. Ile viewed the importation of bodes, tallow, hemp, and other articles, equally injurious to the landed Debt Ode i 1. . Corp far t 1 311 pnrai ed ta Si' 1 1 St. A on 11 Malt St. 1 1 dere' N. 16,1 port M the , II M dere, jecti the I T 1 T ore I . . list N Lice rem cit.. •- Jail II ti adin . , per/. i tra.i terlj fore atom th it !ire imp! silo t silo mar them in a jeni ro'.l had war . . for s of t • yid, earl to II heti T the 0 'qui chit Allti thri and Ile neat 1 111.1 3 i .. lint Ilia' 1 .• ill seui I t , v i ~.,,. CAW ' and teat ' t aid Inol t I 1 DM I I of tile in I . ! pai t / CI t thy 1 COI 1 . t 1 Cl ,, tin . „ P° Po tin RC it ! T 1 th. wi fri tit en ki . . hr. A i.. • lii V at . w tii iu., •1 e 3 di t I an tl , . t; , '' • a Si II h I • c .. . u 1 1, ' • 1 1 I i . • . . . • •• • fattc movie ;Jorge's."' Landholders is' Ideuheaff it ffiseltalsire, wad•ies vici nity. complaining of Agrieultend Distress. • Thiecthey traced in their pettiest:, reset. the Ammo a a free trade in Beer. • The • Petitioners wen (fade! Growers, sod lied formerly as adequate demand for Mew prisdeee. This had sew iiifesk thew la consequence of all the public houses in their neighbourhood having been bought up by eremite great brewers. The Petitioners. ascribing the falling off in the demand foe barley to this came he had neretioaed. seemed to have taken up the Idea that malt had but little to do with the making of the beer fornishedity the brewers of who they cow-, piained. The beer, they contend's'. was very boa in quality, hot the publicans could not help themselves, as from the license being granted not to the teller of the beer, hut to the house lu which it was soh!, they could not go to brewers whe were cot their landlords. The Petitioners were of opinion that much good whole result from granting the liceuse to the publican instead of giving it to the house he inhabited, so that, if furnished with a had commodity, Ise 'night shift his blame. nod carry his license with him. The subject, the MIMI Res. hest. said, appeared to him well entitle ek to Meanest tibn of the Rosen. • • ' Mr. C. W—WYNN said wine inestayealetwe wool. be occasioned by malting licenises merely personal, as it • was the duty of the Magistrate* to regulate the number l of public houses according to the wants of the neigh- Ippoilbsiki. If a public house were wasted in one place. It I Q . means followed that one was wanted in another pet of the same district, bnt making the license per- Metal, the publican if he pleased could remove it from time place where be was wanted, and establish himself where there was one public-house already, and where toe were not necessary. .11r. GRENPELL remarked. the Petitioners did not Wish to interfere with the authority of the Magistrates. 'What they desired was, that the license sh.uld he grant ed in the name of the publican. rather than to the House in which he lived. They wished for this, that if the brewer seat him bad beer, he might right himself by carrying his license to moldier house. Mr. C. W. WYNN explained, repeated in substance what he bad before stated, but added. that perhaps the I I difficulty might be met by enabling the Magistrates to grant a license to an individual, restricting the use oY it to certain limits. Mr. D. GILBERT offered a few remarks which sees, inaudible in the gallery. Sir R. WILSON suggested that it might be wett Ip grant no license to Louses that were in the occupation of brewers. Mr. BENNET earnestly begged that Gestlemen would not run away with an idea that this subjecLerm one which could easily he disposed oL There wasplike I dif f iculty in it. He propo4•9l shortly to bring in. with smile alterations, a bill which had formerly been before' :Nutmeat, but which hail been lost in another place, to ro t cast the whole of the existing laws with respect to l e seese• and public-houses. I Mr. BIItWOHAM solid be would rejoice if his Bon: - hired, the Member for Shrewsbary (Mr. Ilempte. would introduce a Bill of that nature, which, that Roo Member said was heretofore lost is another place s Per his own part, be did not recollect the rovisiens nirthat Bill ; but he was firmly of opinion that the ).ieneing Laws should be re-conablered. He kw* that there were.maey gentlemen connected with the bur trader who wished for such a measure. Be did sot mean to say that the Magistrates generally diode bed Ilse of the power given them. The power of the Niglio testes, however, was liable to abuse, and was in mese places, to the knowledge of all Gentlemen, really abased. , —(Hear, hear.)-11c slid not complain so ls of abase of power by the Magistrates. as of their mistakes of" jodpnient. The Magistrates were too prone to the se curing of a monopoly. and to the allowing of ton many houses to some brewers. That was attess•led with the effect of having a very had species of beer sold. Ile would not have said so much on the subject, if the sys tem had not been tun much acted upon. The petition was then read and ordered to be printed. etdttoi asst ether pleas is Uarbalr. was brought up, rearl.and Pilfered to Mated. Mr. SMITH then rose. he pnreniase of Ids motion.— lie said be would Ira state to the house the • bf which the annerrons paitiosers tempi ord. and imield then propose the measure of relief which he natant I. ask for them. The petitioners complaised that. ley **Act of the 26th of Heart, theSeconl,which was call ad the Marriage Art, they were put in *worse situation than they were before that Act. Marriage I. Itself was essentially *civil mattock and it was a emsiddered by the anon law. By the 26th of Barge the Second, laseng certain ether provisions. it was enacted that 'every marriage should be solemaised in the church, by a Waist*, of the Chords, sad nessirdiog to the Ritual of theeCliurch. He (Mr. Smith) was oar Olken who peti tioned for the alteration of thatpniviiioa, anal he thmight it was Incumbent on him to slier that the Ileitanans 1•1141 reed in eyrie before he called for say situation in their favour. They were free from say charge of crime or guilt is their religions tenets, sail hada right to bead ratted to the exercise of their religion without imposing ea them-the observance of cereinuotes and rites of which they could sot approve. It was needless to say that mar tifige was a sutural right of the wholithhmat species. Sot -the law said • Yea most comply with cereals prescribed rites and cereammies, or forego that right." He thought that each restrictions were inespedient. and rambled those enforced in France by Louis the Fourteenth.— Those restrietioss wore uonecemary is this country. and were yet less mild than them imposed by Louis the Fourteenth. There was soiseeasisteacy is imposing au Catholics the observance of thee' forms which the Roma. Catholic Church prescribed. At the time of passing the 26th Geo. IL the Unitarian Diameters were few in this country. There were two other classes of (Resisters, the Jews and Quakers, who then petitioned. sod were consequently exempted from the forms pre- scribed. The Jews could set be properly called Dies... I tees from the Protestaats. for the former were mote an ! dent, soil the latter might be said to be dissenters from them. But the Quakers were disasters, sail were ex empted. The mode of relief be intended to propose would not bring the Unitarian Dissenters isle collision with the Protestant Established Church. The Jews aid Quakers had followed the same course is their mar riages. They bad given a public notice at their meet• ings, sod came at a stated time after to conclude the marriage contract in the face of the coogregatlon. bad the highest authority for saying that marriage was, a mere civil contract. la 1813, a case of marriage per formed iet Scotland came for discussion before the re seed Lord Chancellor, who said that the law of Sentient was founded on the basis of the eases law which pre valid throughout all Enrepe. On that cation law the laws of Scotland were founded, and according to this, the Level Chancellor sail. that a man taking a women to wife before witnessie s edbs as valid a inernage as is per formed before a. Minister in the church. The 26th of are. 11. gaffe no peculiar sanctity to the contract, but went to do what was on the face of the Act, namely— the better to prevent clandestine marriages." He did not wish to trench ea that security, nor did he meaa to propose any thing but the religious part of the eientrom ny. He did not thirk any religious ceremony necen sae, to the validity of marriages. It was presumption le him, indeed, to say en, but the canoe law said 'ie..— Pope . lonocest the third said, that the validity of the marriage depended on the consent of the parties. He did mot say that some portion of religion should sot be added to the ceremony. bat that should go basil-in-lemed and be in unison with the religious feelings of the par ties. Who could think of imposing Catholic ceremonies on Protestant parties. or of adding Malsomedan rites to Christian ceremonies? The annexing of an obligation of a religions ceremony which the party disclaimed. as far nit could endemismd it, was not adding to the via eases of the contract. He wished to propose demonist sion of such passages in the Liturgy as were not le aid: son with the creed of the Unitarian disinters. The Marquess of LONDONDERR V here Intl that it was not his imention to oppose the bringing tw of the Bill. Mr. W. SMITH paid, that ander such circumstaneee he should add very little more. There was cue only cir cumstance which he should add as a subject marl/ of cariosity. When the Marriage Act passed in the time of Geo. (1.„ there was an exception made in favour of the omits. However the time was in these countries. when the wisdom of our ancestors condemned to the lames the Christian who married a Jew. tie then moved far leave to brief in a Bill to amend certain parts of the Act of the :filth George ii., commonly called the Mar riage Act. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY wished to be understood as not pledging himself to the support of the measure, in not opposing the bringing in of the Bill. Mr. H. BURNEY snpporte.l the Bill, and wished that provision might be made fur dispensing with the obli gation of having the ceremony of marriage, in the case of dissenters, performed by any elergyinau other Bow one of the parties own persuasion. Leave was given to bring in the Bill. IRISH COMMILACIAL CRIDIT DILL. The Home resolved itself into a Committee of the whole House on the Irish Commercial Credit Bill Mr. W. SMITH begged that some explanation might be *Worded open certain parts of this Rill, particularly why so long an interval for repayment was granted to certain persons to whom loans were made. tw‘ The CHANCELIAM of the RXCIIEQZ:ER said. ißist before going into the Committee, it was his inten tion to explain the objects of the Bill before the House. the Right lion. Bentlenun then alluded to the distress which called forth the interposition and the litierality of Parliament, and stateit that when the original Bill pass ed, he understood it to include Bankers in the general description of traders, considering them to be traders in money. It had since been found necessary to take some high law opinions in Ireland upon the 'peados, and they held that although the description et " traders" would include Bankers in England, yet that it would I sot 110 so in Ireland. One object of the Bill was, there. I fore, to remove this difficulty. It had another object, which lie would state to the House. The money was originally advanced for a period not to exceed two or three years; it was now intended that the time should be lengthened to right years. He explained that the comparative rate of interest piid by the persons to whom this money was advanced. and that paid upon the loan by which it was raised would prevent any ail. ditional expense being incurred by the tinvernineut by an extension of the time of payment. They had only to see that the securities were good, which they lied now done. For although is form they were the common commercial securities, yet the landed property of the parties had hems made responsible, and upon that con dition the time had been extended to eight years. —He thought that no objection could he brought against the Bill after the explanations lie hail thus Liven. After a few words frees Mr. W. SMITH, the Bill went through a Committee, and the Report seas ordered to be received to-morrow. The Report of the Irish flank Charter Acts Has real, in.'. the Resolutions agreed to. • . - t ••' ti , atop' ap. read. a br A fter few wants from Hr. .IPS er. the petition . . 53_ be Intl a petitioa . tt pewit. • waibuluibt antallikiiMittlieresl to be primed. lam itcapeiwal tae question of whirr he bed given 1119* Sir JOHN NEWPORT preseuiedit petitiari the Ike. Vaistiotrwsrus be feessleiLasUmp•llo/011.11114 houirhoillers of th Attila Waterford. zpsyllig tut aV. pellillimse pop ea Apresemosi-agsiost. his maims as 11l p 41114•11 larlidl.lepubst Wislkdow Tits la , irelars3.— the other ease. Hellthen Moroi fsf leave to bring no a The petition vow mail and Ordereilli - rmi . priated. OAS* tettmsaltse' teem widow aimed, pressisted...Th I e tas omMa mommoo. . rt*is t l e s l :b ad lat ik s:sa r f i rms i the , Usitariam Disseatars of P 11 . !, TlWlcry . etips' baud a - i tti . ttstefitlb? I " I ' m rearl.anil Ordered tote Ow l p tet i l. arliallas was brought up' - _.. • CATUOLIC CLAIMS. Mr. Secretary PEEL presented a petition from the Synod of Glasgow, praying that the House would not pass into a law a Bill fur the admission of Catholics into Parliament, for the introduction of which his Right Ho nourable Friend, the Member for Liverpool (W. Can ning). had given notice. While he was on his legs, be would Like that opportt.nity of giving notice, that he would oppose the very lint proposition on that subject. whether it were for a Committee, or for leave to bring iu a Bill. Mr. TIERNEY was understood to say it was nnnsual, and be Gum& it insuleut that the Synod of Glasgow should resd a lecture to that House, on a measure which had not yet come before them. Mr. Secretary PEEL said he could not helu thinking it strange, when petitions were presented which did not meet the approbation of Gentlemen on the other side of the House, bow easy it was to raise objections. His Right Hon. Friend, the Member for Liverpool, had , on a fernier night, given notice of a motion for leave to bring in a Bill for the admission of Catholic Peers into the ether House of Parliament, and the petitioners prayed the House that such Bill might not Lre,allowed to pass into a law. Mr. lICJIE said, lie recollected no petition rejected because it had been presented from the other side— (hear. hear); and he would beg the Right Honourable Gentleman 'to state one instance of such reiestion,:-. 1 (Hear, hear.)—He (Mr. Hume) regretted that a *tithes of that sort had come from any part of Scotland : l4m, hear,) the inhabitants of which had themselves en ()yeti privileges of the nature of those claimed by the Lettio tics. tie thought the present an instance of bad taste in them, and showed a spirit of intolerance. Sir T. LETHBRIDGE was astonished, after the pub lic notice given by the Right Hon. Member for Lister pool, that petitions were nut pouring in from all parts of the country against them. If the measure proposed by the Right - Honourable Gentleman succeeded, it would carry the whole question by a side-wind. and t h e coun try an .t Constitution would be put into danger. 'The petition was then brought up and ordered to be printed. 011T8RIAN DISTRISP. Mr. BROUGHAM presented a petition from the Uni tarian Dissenters of Kendal, in the County of IVestuusre land, praying' fur an alteration of the marriage Cafe. ninny, and desiring that they may In put oa the same Costing wish Jews and Quakers in England, and with Dissenters in Ireland and Scotland. Mr. BANKS was understood to say, that that petition was liable to the same objections which were raised against the petition' from the Spiral of tilascow against the Catholic Claims, for there was no measure before the Honse to which the petition referred. Mr. BROLIHHAM said the petition took so notice of any measure before the house, but prayed the house to alter the present marriage ceremony: wit the petition from the Synod of Ulasgow adverted to a measure which had not come before the house. After a few words from Mr. Timm to the same effect, 7:` a-. • Rho ride Malt Dalin' Repeal Hill, and the Gorton wall Melt Duties Hills. be r i s.were s;erd tn eetally Repntts The Report of the Stamp Dative Art wts teceive I, he several Resolutions reed and agreed to. Mr. HUME ' , termed his intents. of moving, at 16 sane advanced stage ord., Hill. a reduction from thine talweaty per teat. in the allowance to Stamp Ma r i. butors. The CHANCRLLOR of the ESCHRQUER said tens she aetontlass Onernewat hod hen toned wiliest& int. aid that nee ad wastages/se alteration wets too. thasplated. The Resolution were agreed to. sad leave wu granted to bring la a Hill fended thereon. Colonel DAVIES said, that as an Res. Frind of hit had given notice of a 'notion relative to the rawer .( the Crown to dismiss °Sem from the Army witssot trial. sad as he had not fixed the tine* he wished t• ask if it was still his intention to bring tit +abject forward* Hoot. be (Colonel Davies) should himself taketehe Moe duty. Mr. HUME was happy to hear what bad falls+ Irmo We Hos. Friend, as he !mould gladly leave the natter it MO hawk. Col. DAVIRS gave vatice of a unties ea the abject.. 0 Tuesday. the Illst of May. 'fhe CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER sond e that !heath/ which stood ima the paper for the farto consideration of the Report apes the Saprniewsetiat Act to-nutrrote. should be discharged, sad kid is/ Friday ant. Tay other orders being disposed of, the Bow it joarned. , cosewrrs REGISTER. rIMIE REtilnalt for the 'reseal Week. will res. • tale • LETTER to Mr. WESTERN us the Repeal et PEEL'S RILL. The neat Register, so Address to the C e a o s pl e : of England on the treatment of the Catholics. la ease, of a raw arrest's's& Is order that the Register should be more early and pear:teal as to the time of errilal l in the country, it will be seat in future from the Ollre. ISt Fleet-street, earriatte-paid. AU letters (pest-paid) to tea Glos. will be pesetas/1y attended to. PRlcit OF WTOCKS, AT ONK O'CLOCK, TH la 6 kV. 3i01% 5t0ck.........148 411 IoJAa Stoat WI li t Ipr (X Red 77eff Ditto Boodadts. —4. --cp.. I per Of. Coos Diiiikil South Vas itto,:k.. ...... e.l Nes Fears *4 tooth Sea Old Awl 4 per Costa I 5 per Cb. Navy. 1021 i ii WOOL V 1 perfect —.-5001. a 4a.oa. pat. Leap Ago... .....194 11-16 I —Small ..52.61. pa lop. 1 per Coot Co.. for Ant NMI Irish 5 err Coot. ' Lott. Tickets tr; it DVS. 1 Dubllo - 0 1 Waterford - 0 • & Jersey - I Lisboa - I O Gottestaarie - 0 Lit. Il►a O Helienei - - 0 U Umbra' - - I I Franc* . - 0 U Filmier' - - 0 p• fM ateesal (dike Feat teenage if the tlreelation rj Tae tissue's's& slue the *trampoline:el eith COBOETT, it has bees deemed espedient le reaper the Office le more Central aid wore Calmestlent Premises. Strand; and that se delay is the detieers # the Papers Naze be weasteneet ►y the setelltionel deity Sale. peeper oneasures knee bees adopted for decelerating the publication. the atateisman. iris Wren " TN APRIL 18, 1821. TUB IN ITISU LONDON: TOCISVAT ETININO, STOCK EXCIIAXUM. TWELVE O'CLOCK. Consols opened this morning at 78f, fur the Ac count, and 764 for Money, sad have been done as low as 7Si fur the Accoont ; they are now 71g. This fluctuation is ascribed to the great disappointment frit in the city, particularly by the monied interest, is consequence of no question having been put to 3linis• ten last night, concerning the progress of the sego• ciations at Constantinople. A number of persons, it is supposed, bought Consols yesterday afternoon, es petting something would have osn erred is the Hoses on the sohject, bat finding themselves disappointed, they sold again to-day, to make up their smut. — The market appeared very heavy this morning. FOUBION IPUN DS. A little business was doing in the earlier part of the morning, but at present it is rather flat. Spanish (New) done at.... COI Prussian Danish .. liS Neapolitan Old Columbian New . . ONE O'CLOCK. There is a report on 'Change that an egress is ar• rived front Paris bringing the Fret.elt Feuds 1 per Cent. higher. PROCEEDINGS IN PARLIAMENT. Last night the Donn of Commons met, and, aad at breaking nit adjoersed till to-morrow. There were three topics elated, that of !Amain, Pal& Nooses. that of the Catholic Peers, and that of Cuitarino Nor riages, the last of which we deem srlso;ly unworthy of occupying any portion of the time of oar rewires, beyond what is nee emery to hear us remark, the , , as Mr. W. Satire, the head of this Church, flys, that alt he asks fur, in, that the Unitarians may be place , ' 00 1 '• the same footing with the Jews and tie Quakers". we hare no objectipu to the measure .` The more the merrier", they say ; and, at any rate. there einem I e much mischief in adding one more Act of Parliament to the fifty enormous volumes of Acts that already ea., ist. The other two topics are of a different chara , kr. The Liteseing of Public Ibi.sed nAs brought fu . ward in a petition from Maidenhead, which ascribed part of the Agricultural Distress to the presets Li cencing system ; as thus : that& n arkct was wanted Ice Bart( ; and that this arose, in part, from the brewers not makiag ass of welt, in the making of beer ; and that the brewers were enabled to force their beer Imo the throats of the people by the monopcny that the Li• cencing system gave them : his is a little toe INV' alone. it savours rather too mach 011ie twist which t mad people lease; raincly, that of Deride all Ofects to some fin %write cause. Du , . it true eroqi % I T F