The Statesman. — London, England, 1814-04-29 00:00:00

.~ ~ .. ~,. I ~d'a♦ .sthPs .. ~. • • s- . ,;. ; . ' • ot •;•• v ‘ ' that they were ititrocluce(nitO ► irrifitirltOwftfl iliew to elicif l the,Cettet, for the i fiat in 'their:4oov conduct, .he th44l/10f# techeicei, laror t f o f t ,Lhow i . 9 „ t a; h i m, - night desert,. contoderiti42oa .%! - . ...--.. • . ... .... _ . -. • . . . _ .. the prOteat : (lioweref . . 4 iii-foroe titlgfee, the' geidance of 'the par. B eheuki' not restrict , consideration, of. the . v. obsei rations u hs c ji with reference to 6i s ; and this the more,. , Isei front 'the 'respect. concerned, that there , j ng the legal' rights of , rse and litigious spirit .. r first instance, to have ble .nwrisiirc,„ that , 4 ligious workp to it munity .of , iirighton, ' loWer order. • lf..weit inlets all Imiciol.O it . Ins. landalily . t4ctwied; to (atlinate Ile il*iott 4 onanifee which Seer* ' in the . . doctrine ei . tiet that the .cure`of . seals , i• by,141 hisiitution de ibent. No one, there ? 1.14 right, without being ' titles prescribed by the P, the province of the ; for,..if the filets were urce than to decree the herefore, to be wished, er these matters ; and, any degree of acrimony ', t(a suspicion, howeser, ~ o meaosentertilo is the till as the right . be (lain. he Court would recent.. titi ither ,elde r hat Pith. .. his wriiild probahly least - P s esired,namieshleputf. .t, es between the *del • .' : might be effectad,',att .: i.person agreeable to all :00 1 3 .ilid advantege of 111)g:wild of it.. 14eaving the parties, .thss .CisisrA .\ •, Perform ) , In pronnunciag was ill-founded, ands!, .. ' tear absolutely. :Its ts. EVILER. ) the validity of the w4l ate , . Kingsley,Kingsley,of gsley, to :*lsß, to. - died' 11.* plon'th-of iflttetY6th tilt put `O/- Mts. % :4ke. "40 61 0, and OA ppoeed -1 1 7 , aereral others 41Ati!lielg• of PerP9* PA' • ..oF99ei t Xt- ;EI49 01 ! 4 .IQ , panted by tbotaoll.l*4#l.- g 4•,4 ' . . , 41 '4, OM il3.s.t.ttlfilialls4/ 1. w.ife PtOfec! - btl** ll -0 1 . 0 . wo.o,.egitaily ',of.. 0pc014, 1 4 1 0? rer crsete4,.but if or willip,4 to. /a hap the ety• . ~. i (4.:T 444 .... - ' ig in - mpeechtient of riff; tlie qieitton 4fosts V Ch they Otild - Oly . ; _but ping with . tlitim i sirett 'lst . • . Irther to cdrii:' The win. d for, but selthollecosts... ; —„.,.............. !r. _A n t iL 28. - a Wife; were Indicted far steal- he property of Mr. Harris, of mat with Mr. Harris, and the sr to her at the time; and they Harris Ind Joined several ar- ion was'tracid to the prilutters. Sat the area Prisoner was aware taieed, and be was acqui , sighed on another • eat, if, the property of• . . Ingram, after the woman Prisoner had • got into that of the Prusectitrri , 4 instance, several article's '' re ..,, preseat indidnbrot, a ow-window, and another rota rile had given it to the"-elite The evidence 4Vassuilicieow I the felony, and he was Await ted in consequence of un erret invieted for a burglary in dim ler, and stealing lz, pair of short I senteace of death upon theta. man, Thos. Rodman, Alithati. ' Usu. Clemeats;anti .In. liaise ug houses—lllary Williams Md . muter:tit money, having before i titterers of ham. mooey—Rotit. , -.t.pb Mirarld,. for a high**, Or a highway robbery—Eliza- :—Wm. Smith fur burglary — is, and Ans. Variety ler like of- -1% ilAigms • for retorming from • • orgaiy 7 O.J:i Win. Henry Bette. r apts. ' a goad-Woking pleat , in the catio s !y of is siipitr.Ve filiation before Mr. Leann an 4 a n conreFAan, with haiiik ono. 4 heinotN crimes. The coint,tble hoot live &clock tli4t mortar% in inf4:rtned him tbs.. !here dot; it's yard just by him ; he inure. Lo the spot. where he NNW dm , ea down by the* persons ah riioner had previously attest.' .p pond of water frogi wheel:. difficulty. After witsesv wt., . bird attempt on his awn life bir iii. his shirr to rnolle, it into II he then I..iid, as he was pit to 14 hat•Vras qiiite a burden to hio. ,Itia:•cnitudr Ant .st,sigracret, ia p tit; Public, Justice. to forfeit hi oontry t that he'd..sire.d to dir t me; his roascienee-a - ttvet Ws $ isyr its. dust neiglit;oitrhoo/ 4 no simile 'called . for - pen, idle, and the.erimes, viitly, which • he said and he nor sfrgsercd a writte l .43 with his tialW . , , (lifting him. tutus • bush. rras found to be taien care. ,1 • * , ft ** 0.1. :. ' - • .- Vi .inall,,Ft4. secapt; sea of :A • le r,lir 4 V ^d• 40;' 11 . 414 qfritb +Of j. il! on!, , • -';". "k .:Et ti , i'.; •.' •L J ..' s • M i lrlrig rr * l * lll it,tip/i 11-,p1e,,, eel. or4b. I 4, • eel r , • . . . . , _ t ' ; a: . .. • . • ''' ' , • STKI ESMAN. • • ••• • 4/ LAW iN7'ELLiOWNCi. . ".. 1" P.,.,i;Am'ou - th, . ifiiierinq - 0 ( the g lik er e hiiieglein • (peat' (flied, a proeettOng .at law. - rim inutftvoted to .. . . ... COIIIti* OF CHANCERY , .kra.ss. V.' , ~." *: try the . ilit,stibli,iyicbisaild s lisg this asiquiry, *mission I.as v. LEE. .: ~ Vibilliiiti IO- einNitid the vend. For this '.oorpese, . „ must be in the remembrioceclA, our I CUstothAtente iiffiee'rt aUd Excise officers *ere *env __ . .... 1, h. ' Jimmied . one ilnirmso, 4.. • &CHES. COP RT,..rOVOIt:I,.COMMONI . orricz or no rosot rieApvp sr coke; , ItA This *sills cause or office pioitiotbd' by . thekitai. Robert Vicer-ofekciightheinistone) Sas ser, gig* s • William Marsh, for preaching ')uiiding PO Readers. .The Rev. Mr. Lee recovered ditualigesliv i down tir Portsmouth, acctimpao..... by .._ .. if fit; the. Court of ,(ring ' s Bench, on on action of Crim.', the mister klf • the vessel..:' Upon. arriving op !pink ' Con. brought •by him against the Hon: Col. Blue- however i ' fluffqiiii*sta • Seized by "'Orestes troileA. quiets. The Rev. Gentleman afterwards apPlied to and sept,prisonpr to his own.allip,, In . , ca oseqq•ssa the Court of Chancery, that the money paid into of tiiis.procceding„ it will that . the'ivrit of Habeissi Court, as the property or torten, of Mrs. Lee, Corpus had.heen obtained fries, gr. losticei Bailey, shOuld be assigned to him. Th e Lo r d Chancellor, calling upon Berestes to bring the WO .of the - saidi on this occasion, appointed a solicitor for Mrs. Lee; ; Huffman befora,,his _Lordship* hambers. Thet and, onbearing the merits of the cause, his Lord- person:s.Who went to se r e sh i p Wilt Were accompa.; ship directed that her annuity should be extended tied by a . person Who explairsed yn the e r e lam. from 2301. to 4001. per annum.guage to perestis iti,.purpnri. histeid, however,' Sir SAMUEL Roaut f LY moved this day, that Mrs. of attending to it b* Owe" it 41'0 ° kilo the boat, Lee *Should poy unto Mossrt. Furter and Co. the And said he. ad the Or&r. ofibeSding papili it Am bassa t dor A mount-of their bill of costs, out of h e r annuit y of ,to detain Huffman. Ilds proCee was thaied• 4001. per annum, paid to her by Mr. Lee, . It was to the present. Motion, _not his wish to enter into the d e tails of • what ' had al- ; hir..Justice BA..TLEY said, he believed the ground ready been .before his Lordship; but, under all the "upon which the man, had been detained, was the circumstances, he trusted his Lordship wOuld grant fact of his , having been on board the prize, at the :the prayer At' the Petition. - time she was taken, and he vas seised by Rerestes Mn, Lee, a very handsome . and elegant looking as a prisoner of war who had escaped from his ens woman low from the Student's Box, and addressed . tody. .. 1. his Lordship. . She said that s h e felt extremely ;. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL submitted, that even if obliged re him -for the kindness lie had shown her this were the case, it was no ground for resisting the th r oughout the pnfortunate cause. She would not ilerit of Habeas Corpus. ...- .. .have Winded *port his Lordship's attention, only I Lord ELLE,lncittotttlx- 44 You bad better take a she did not see her Counsel in Court. Ills Lordship .rule to show cause why the attachment should not • was well o%•itre that she had . sulteted many hardships , he issued, as the Spahiard, although flippant, may by the misconduct of her hushand. It was not her have acted from ignorance." in to say any liking in mitigation of what had The ATTORNETtGENERAL expressed a hope, that happened afters tut's. Lly her marriage settlement, the Court would order, in case the rule could not Mr. Li.e was• bound to pay this debt ; under, those be served personally on Berestes, of which there was :cieconfstances, the trusted that his Lordship would , some doubt, that the service might be considered extend to.hei his protection.. . !good, if the rule WThi deliVeioll. l 0 any person on The LORD Chauctsci.ott observed, he would read board his vessel. , .. the Petition, and sire it his full cenilderatiOn, and . . Lord ELLENnottoonm..--M The Court cannot anti- Ile tionitl give his:Optitiritt on Saturday next. • .cipate a resistance to its order ; you must therefore Mrs. Leo was-accompanied by Colonel Blacquiere. Novo your. rule in the best manner you can." The Rev. Mr. Lee 'toed .belandtiltent. • • ' SIR JOHN URNEYWOOD V. STONE. Mr. PARK. moved for a rule to show cause why a new, trial shim'', not be granted in this'citse. It was --dal - nntraCl; tried at the last sit. ,4-„egainst . , and administering the sacramark l4 with- Migh. in the said.,Parish ( to t duly consecrated forpiibliC general cisivitileiden ortM ksise 4vorelsip, • ood without a Valence from the Bishop.—, readily, as heliouid not irtippot he. suit was instituted hy letters.of request from the able character of the parties co Consistorial Court of Cliicbester, end an appearance was any intention of ,obstructins bras given for the Rer. Mr. Marsh, but under protest the Vicar, merely frusta perverse as to the jurisdiction of the Court; and the present Beth parties seemed, in theG question arose on the admissibility of the protest, co-operated in a very laudable .which pleaded first, the statute of 1812, which, it providing the means. of reli was contended, - authorised any meeting of Protest- large portion of tile cenwn ants, on certifying the same to the Bishop : second- particularly those of the 1. ly, it'set forth, that the building was a (Impel, built I therefore with a view to prnr by subscription, for the purpose of public worship, I rang. meat between persons tht according to the rites of the Church of England.: that the Court felt disposed' t, that the Vicar, Mr. Carr, was originally a party to ` upon the law of the case In Ai the undertaking, which was also sancti o n ed b y the i.e.d.to be desired. He agreed Bishop; that certain Trustees were appointed, who had been stated by Counsel, nominated the Rev. Mr. Marsh to officiate in the I vested either in the bishop, or Chapel, and that he entered on - his office accordingly I proper person, in the incumbel iii July last, and had ever since continued to officiate fore, could infringe upon this with the knowledge of the Bishop , bu t without a re- :exposed to the pains and pens ' gular licence from him, which it was contended was : law ; and in enforcing these, not necessary muter the abovementioned Act of Par- Court was merely ministefill; !lament: and, lastly, it was admitted that the Vicar proved, it had no other resort having originally consented to the erection of the legal punishment: It was, thk chapel within his parish, could not now promote this that the parties would consider suit against the ferson who officiated in it. even if the Vicar had evinced The protest was supported by the a ffi davit of Sir !in the vindication of his right Thomas Bernard, who corroborated the facts al- which the Court would by .no leged ; and added,-that the trustees had filed a Bill present state of the cause), sti in Chancery against the Vicar, for relief in the pre. tained was unquestionable, tic raises. i mend its being respected on tl The Counsel in support of the protest rested grin- roibearance an his part. Tin cipally on the Act of Parliament, as wholly taking to what was so much to desi away the jurisdiction of the Court in this case ; but promise of existing differences they farther contended, that the tacit approbation t if by which their mutual object the Bishop was equivalent to a licence ; and that the divine service performed by a , Court having a discretion in a cause of office, to . pasties, ta,the. great itii . tracl permit or disallow any individual to act as promoter many who were at present di of the suit, might exercise that discretion against the this to the' consideration of Vicar in the present instance, and ought to do so, on, had a much shorter duty 'to pe, Aran. V. lour the ncE-CtrANcrizon. & hi fore s .1/91t , ~ • au action 'on it special co l ) Ilia ATLAS lASURATACE COMPANY V. •—•-•• illatilal 'dogs at Guildhett; and a verdict was given for the ( - .• ' ' ' nse. :' ' Plaintiff. ' The facts of the case were these :—Sir kic t Orps Utovpd,, tbat theiojtinction in • this 1 0 1 1 n (toners nod had purchased a valuable- how, , cause should he.continued, to restrain the Defendant from the Defendant, open a contract that if be did front proceeding Att law to recover 70001. until his not like the animal, and would return it on the lst . ! .llnswer was put hi, an d that a commission should of Oetober,-With a brace of 'pheasants, in as good ' P - , - condition is. when he bought it, the pur chase-mone y issue to examine several witnesses i n Ireland. , ;141 Bearfd that (he. Defendant 40.; in Dahlia, insured shoUld be returned. On the ht of October he the life of his wife for 70 0 01..w1t0-slioitil 'afters - welds • did return the horse,,and on the evening of the same I died, with the agents of the Plaintiffs. -L-The Learned i cit y sent a britte of pheasants by the Canterbury ' 'Counsel said, he made this motion on the affidavit of i coach, addressed. tolhe Defendant in the'olfijewry. the Plaintiffs' agent, who swore that - Dr. PercirdPrbe Pheastints . were not delivered till the ltl. Of .43n• and otter rili . SitiallS were necessary witnesses on !lobo., irtni'lleticolt *as contended, that the innitract the trial ; anti they hail stated that no pecuniary re- t m a s ted intalvi-the'Plaintiff had not been fulfilled- 7 compence would make thein'tieglect their great pro-1 v i ll a open this gcound it- wee, that the Learned Coon:. fessional business by corningto London ;he therefore, tit - no w mnv ' tal i 4.11004. that. trusted. his Honour would grant a ookroo4sion to ' Sti. SitioklA frfA,lo-..--" The pheasant,' re sent . 44/i examine them in Ireland. - . Jon the Ist of October." •.. . . LP IV dart, Mr. 11 "" , C ?unst 4 foi.:l -- .. .!I 2to pill, „ ' 'Mr. Pattl—' 4 'lty Lord, the contract ens ape- sht s ,wns the-second jipie thathiiiiiarfoi/j!cling.gau c' C 3 mid it,:bp et il' tie:Plaintiff f jil au made th is 'metiers. • ANlvisi.hensitde it',Welif i t' am .i....- ..siune., ,_. .w . • inemwsaL%-= he cue ~, - r • dismissed with costii - it was now as irregitlet 13-Thett then% le ippi 101ott Masipic witilia,.* .. *pat. and must meet the . same' fate. Ile wol.kl ask the - )iittid.6 ••!s . . . • 1 .., . "Court-, how- it could grant au order for tite posemia. 6 : ori:fititilartrie.,voC ." The Contract says gene. Mon, before the Defendant's answer was put in i itill4that the phrs *ail be ilipiipried on the Ist which, for .a hat be knew, might admit all the , al- : I . . of .- 01 i; ;; •- ,- • 0 i.witie, tut .411n4,1115y seat, ;o the 4cgitions in the bill, which would make the examine- , hire„__.'.V-1 • I •'W IW I' ! Sion of WihieSSOS unnecessary altegether ? It was not i r;-. - in , _ t o nit_ _ L___::.. . 0. have come - • -• .- Ireland were of' ---,mr,.. Jr ARA— A 11 1 ! . Pea Sia n° . _ _ o ught _ 1 _ ith it account of the steps he had first taUen, together with that the protest to the suit wt the trustees, toward the erection of the chapel. The . Naiiktking the Defendant to tippet', Learned Counsel, however, added, that if the Court as'eca AND 01116113 should intimate its opinion on the law of the case, I This was a suit relative to generally, to be against the understanding entertain , .of Mr.RiChard Baker, la , ed by the trustees, they would pay e ver y re g ard to county of Southampton, wht such intimation. !June, 1809, It was propel! The Counsel fol.. the Promoter contended, that in Richard Baker, the son. of the present stage of the cause, the sole question for executor int.med in it, aud.op tiveconsideration of - the Court was, whether the ju- of the deceased's children, el risdiotion of the Coati. was, or .was not founded.— titled .in distributipu to That this again reduced itself to a question, whether testacy., the jurisdiction yea or Was not taken away. by the After the case . had been opened late statute; that that„statute was most notoriously the ettecntor, . , made for . th!! ...prgt?gliPit of Di.sesaing Meeting- Sir .S.Ons Nlcunts. Awry' (louses ; that .the . .prtainble showed. this to be the and execution of • the .nit! . case ; that-tire went protestants, in the body of the. posWtpility. of doubt. .4;) Act, construed by. thelpreamble, could mean nothing , that the yore ant was not a car but Ettoostant (): 9 isatttlers ; that the officiating c - ifilityt. 'Coarse& -rii5464,4h.0 was , ,wi tun, • oitilackkkjlei.ol...KtPe. o . l, s.ry_ ,o rd ain e s) „deuce, , i* ...Chissetr ef Angleott; amid the chapel-4u't Thkcirintiel fit - 144411414 beiekr.eatfeslettly bat, ts;..r kce9rd- impossible tq of'er anyn . thin kw to the rites of thpt : Churel4 Wit the person, and evidenceln support of the 4 . 1 Once were under episcopal jorlstlie:Oon ; and that the was the only one Upon, *hie Aer'of ParilAment contained *strcespress reservation ' the opinion of the Court* istiliarjerisdictibn. Aslo Ware ether matters in, poiut, 'they had nothing . fort iii4pco4'int i o`the protest, , they' Observed •thai they I was . accordbey p r on t riaced net declinatory of the jurisdiction, bui:merely eitcu' dory Of the party and . Couo.. net noveloonst. OLD VALE sworn that evil f.'4l4i Witneiies iii an advanced' ate,. end incapacitated from coming to :' Withi11;41,17.0.; owl 441bi0 biiit , ifigiareil wi. tpi tt .,_ • this country. It could not be allowed to be said theft e f "Ctilli)ere"... ..: ... .: . : , dered by the Court on an ex-parte affidavit 1 _ sat the ---.1.-- Oat no pecuniary reward would induce those medi-.1 Lord Et.r.rassounileultoted4 that all bad been done ll ' rim .ever authoris e d th e F,.'Braselev and siisannati, his did n ot admit that he had cal gentlemen to came to London ; for if such an . • which coukl be done cSa forward -the ~pheasants, as L. , . eotleniart in'itees;ion to preach within his parish, ! l i ty , anantify of chin, &c. the the e i l d i :by the statute . they could not be killed - ea the day r, the chapeltst be opened', and that t he consent Of 1- ", l ;, e r f ena t e p rim , 'louse was suffered by a Court of Equity ) ner lived servadt . the Vktir was indispetisibly. necessary l'or such par- i man Prisoner paid reed di tr of. justice might at all times be frustrated. I before: the ist, oG October. Sir s tm - o o ia B ias i - iai satis fi ed that w wss dose ; that theldea of sa cpustruitive licence by the ,rf ies Mr. OWEN contended, that the Court 'had the . ,1 " : f ri t i c i r d w J p roperty ow tl es r i . ti, shop Was . altogether absurd, and idch as ,could 'h ere ~,,,, ~,„,i,2 nceto ln ilw that power to extend the injunction until the answer was : Meint i thitilie• birds should be actually killed and into the bead of way person in • put in, and to stay the trial at law ; and when the : delivered le•the.Defendant• on the same day. The . never bare entered the property was dishonestly obtai the least acquainted with the ecclesiastical law ; t h at ' but the female was found guilty. , answer did come in, be would move for the commis- ' Plaintiffscoa bound to kill and teed Off the birds on ; The two Prisoners were area, the licence must be in writing; that they had de- : cliargthem with stealing, bat . Sion to examine witnesses. 1 the I s t .october, and this had been done .. dined on the part of the Vitar to go iuto the history ; His Honour, the Vicr-CtiAncp.r on observed , ! 4 . • '9 , . 1 The Court finally refused to grant the rule. a teitierm cheapside. ier lt th ate r azd e , i , i f i i c i v r i . a i r i n a e r e n , , t , hn sti t e I • that he thought the Learned Gentleman (Mr. Owen) ' .. , . • , 1 of the case introduced into the protest and affidavit, ACKEWLEY, F,sl2. '1). eanxixsov, n. D. AND 114WDS- ,as thinking it altogether irrelevant to the question and salmi after, as in the former oughtlo produce an affidavit that his Clients expected rms.-it. A hat, the subject of the I.ICY CLERK. before the Court ; but that the selling up so flints%) 4 discovery •by the answer, before he could get the I' * ... ,• - 2 /a • ;lifiiiiv conveyed out of the s:ior the sack. 0144i:used.. The rear& injunction enlarged. . 1 I n this action,. which, it will be recollected, i plea, the consequent delay which it occasioned, and • Mr..liess.naaid, the Court could not travel. out b roug ht against the Vicar-Getieral of Chesterand hie the admitted fact that the Rev. Gentleman continued Tribune on whem it was found. of the notiee of . motion. ,He did not, wish to go gemrtes for excoinmunicating the Plaintiff, for to oitikiste in this unconsecrated chapel in defiance of I,',.',,T;t%'."7l::.,aontnala;viziiipaich;leuiiunt:d into the merits .of the case; if he did, he would sot taking out administration to his father's estate*: the .otation of this Court, loudly calletl on the Court, in thi.. indictment. ''';',' show that•the trial was at . issue in the Court of Mr. Assorr moved for a rule to set aside the verdivfl! even hi this first stlge of the cause, to condemn him di, J ,e it ii le:‘ , l . it:r .. k . w t il., m rh ea l uta p i rat King's Bench before the bill was flied. He would .for the Ilaintiff, upon the ground that the actlea , wile ;in the costs of the proceeding. . ! and a pair of'boots, asliropt:rtv el .not mailitaiiiebie; Ist, because no action lies apinit 1 The Judge (Sir Jonx NicnotL) said, that the Same day the Recorder passed ask, how was he or his C4ient to know what mo. tion Mr. Ovveo would make, if he was allowed to an Ecclesiastical Judge for eccommuuication, if hg; jurisdiction of the Court, to entertain cognizance of 1 oiv: , i ia,: tt ilr i i t s= vij ;ti t . w hi teman. Ward, Margaret Bryan, Wlll. W alter the notic e. of motion by his owe invention ? have jurisdiction of the suhjoct matter ; and, 24, t causes of this na t ure ge ne r all y by letters of request, . Se . was clearly sot opinion, that the motion was - because SUCh action lies not merely for pretsnunciue was recognised, by statute; that the jurisdiction was, . Olenn - ats. for stealing in dwelliii; Eliza witt:, for utterito• con irregular ; preepdestt. practice taiktini ' se—fie sentence of.excommunicatiowossilrwit.teoftorwa .., therefore, founded as to the /dace of judgment; that been cony • ' a„ teted Of being common .. .trierefore submitted, ,tisat It mast ' It& lulatil k od ill lbeif4gthh - thdre h c -11 , 0004" .. “01. ► '; there could be as little daunt that it was founded Johnson, for Itorse-stealing—Jo-epb cos't.' • '. • ' •' ' .' to the first point, .he Oited-WillopC.o.-- , fl avelesa, . under the general law with respect to the alleg . ,%d mhberY —wm • Fe 3 Hierstone. for - f•-• ' befit Gibbs, for houschreakirg . . Oscrx,: in ;reply, mid; accordion to the ar- 406.; Sulk. 396.; 1 Ld• Bayer. '414"..4'011.11‘5tati23.; le off•nce, inasmuch • as the preaching in an (income- Joseph 13atutistcr, Wm. titivins, .istiment of his finned Friend, if a Man, stated that 'K t" ?' 17 •:; 2 BIR. 1141; and 6T. R.... 46.. 8ut,../Nie crated place, or without due titithority, had often fences —Ro4ert Homan], ass Vs another was indebted to hits ,1001'. .and the real 'the hate Act - of 53 G. S. c. , 127 ,/which isbjeets ' ; been the subject of proc eedin g s in this Court • that te . -ansportat . —. lns. Smith for forgery .s 2 . . rift, ror a like.arenee. debt was. only spoi:M could not recover it. There ~..tenseriorir parsons kr Sodtgiesdgef.Courte to awr 1 with respect to the idea or the jerisdiction Deing' --- • was nothing irregular in granting A" at'i"r part of ,de CORiamace. capiendo, and not di- 'exemnsinnierdeik 1 'taken away by the stitate of. 1812, it it had been to IlArrots-nattoest.—kehttrd ilut•no*e .ot. motion. Tbe Court .144 always been I this ease would have been of the greatest ireporminw that statute must have gone eutirely to subvert the mart was brought up yesi, , rJay, •in the habit it modifyitlg 'latices. ' - - Fra . ,..e1l occlesiaatical jurisdictions ;- and ; -and the Ctaig' fundamental constitution of the Church of England, i from Latield.highway. for esatuit . !gr. St.t.t.of4, charger!, on hi; ow ts • . H ii. Amour, the VICE- Cut. o bmirTga rl/ 4 411.tapls thought it lintiorta,ntetioogh to'he ii• -•• .., and to take away all those guards with which the milted .everal murders and whet' lit . . Colt . , elat l injauctions to reltzain going io trial in at !'' 'IP hail I time ' immeMorlal wisely, protected stan . it, an he was called up ahoui , s hy of al his nei„nislusurs who ' .• if Law , were always granted upon an. a ff idavit of (hot Inibetits : but that, whatever con- n'tnan hanging in a wheels; rigts; V4.'•• l i eepeetation of dovery• Peing made on 'the answer .ve been intended to be given to diidely got up and repaired 's( A` ,- . weing put hi ; an d atter it was pue in, , the Court. :stunts, the psoviso in the 13th sec- r P o rizip - n i i itOe Bar, who was I r : was in the habit of .gra wing a coromiesion to esti% saving the ecclesiastical' jurisdic. -ed to d t rown An ktu l lf in n e dre r p - • mine witnesses abroad. how could he .grant an its- all pretence for saying, that the he was re , efied with much .• • • called, the . Prisoner made' tth • Junction to restrain from .joing to t rial,, , until a return , in a case like the present from stripping inalseff and tearing x. - . 1451..% mad ele a commission to examine witnesses, when! iye been. As to the obledioti ae i t . 11,118_ ritiw : weavers prevented hirn ;in • I ')lo.was ignorattuthat the issuing of the eomiaission Arldettlly_i • as promoter of the i 4 t, the rotated to•takit away nilfetha isr hi stif t .n. i ~ e•wenld.delive at .ini J 1 sw‘ s aki ever be Oecevsari? fie .w.oal**,kke of oPi• tit Reverend Gentlemen - was ' alit order that he might he giveu up • . brie the r tkillit, thafthe =nape could fiat succeed.—Dismisied , ratio the most preps' one to • lif e toihe in jured laws of his en , .r Wltit costs. .. . dice, the grievance et:disdained of as Rota . the enormity of his swim.. . . ... is , cure, null there ' being tin Objet- u e ne t ther i i rkai=. ‘ The "3.*" .:Att r- 4 • Wl' I CCIINV.T •OttiNti'S . 101 NC% litittiAL .-, 'Nifty for the costs of the proceed. Imiter, , imucsier to write down om.y . be made should. prove unfounded. his couscienre thrst npbraided him. and • '. ... 11ARPn SVRPrS. •, with the Promoter's Counsel, that lai n r r witt:a e are a a r iti r ti e :e ' r 6 .!i eiti The ATTORiES- Gr et a •rnavell . foe- an AMA. - . mailers iotrodurcd -into .the'captestJferc,, a nd zityrch : lo.l** tAlio a cart 4., *r: • '4:lent against Jose:Deka* sv Spari3g4i , tfai r t Otini. ;gas TO: as they r.,eitgeil ..cP Abel:: • •• i t‘'.. - P--- tempt, in refusing iii , oliey a fiabeas Corpus, issued ' of we l cfrie, ,which must hereafter . ' '' ' 0 ' - n11 1 .6 Ly Mr. Justice Bailey, at his Chambers. .i . . , , _On thelgth Inst.-140i 39. Wm.. 31 Opp jnbo by .plea . ,gtio,,prnof on prioi..q..of ikviickavott,l'Ared; 'rho cireernstances under which the Habeas Corpus lifli#.3.ol'4).ficeittiv?‘ the .opt :4)11 Nt'iliil?tisti!s+ Pluftilitg, arett4.o; i. , was issued it these :--st ship sailing under a . Liri-- %. livid ail .44 le iiiteenoirti ith .. eitit. .11.4. of.r•sandfasto.k.usik.s.l • -,:::, • 1611 liceoetyfor _France, was detained by a Spattisll ...dedscting I 4re-4441111.11fr,titns,taiii i k , : t • . -........L.z.i.:.,_,...„..,,,,...1.,,,,.r...44 ._ ~. ) . is es) ~ f 1J j ice LoN u „, i , ." • t ~d „b• • . private', commanded by Jose Berestes,aud sent into tem ; lit as i Inuritsien thrown oat . • '‘). - - "44` " 4 ' vPilh rt i STATESMAN a r t , r • eVieII,II4PIN sisuusais. .... 5...r.r. ...............-.0-- -- -- • • , the suhiect of a ariGial . 4la for Argument, in e rhl h . !. law hail, from tin] the first queened '' , w;tt —he, . whither , Ecelissiestfeit‘ I the eights of Inco ru i Judges-ors AllibilkifrAtig44oo at law for sa (wrong., 1 s tru c tion might haul ~ -' • • ' • .• • ' i not. td whe th er die this.word Protestal . • ' ,-;.•`'... ...,,,''' .l. • 41* F . .tire, — ; r eit — lowed' .. M r ..itio. ' tiotrof the Act for Vetrinitlillat be meant talbitnettauch a hismitt. tito, took away a 'moos upod the circumstance .tif i ' &Wirt billill : ..taii *VS altered, i peered id the f:ccirsitsticat Co • ' his Magri ; what it had always Itedlitsing prayed.tinse and a. '.. 'dots - - ..,,, I Mr. Carr, luditidfi his aiiidseit t .heiiiiiiip it, :•1 ~. ' • -- • 4 ' 34 " . Judge'said, that th , ~ . -. ..- , • —........ . ~ , or--, ti only, a competent p • ; coultVOtaollsos' • aatiet i. - . ':' '___r.: - • with • ..,_ .. • •, . . • 4- • ~ 4-- Mee t i ng lonia nil el, ~,,g L . • • - 1 1'. 9 5 " . !'Y . : ) ;! 111 ‘"1 r l ea . - den to . his respOnsi 1 11%; 1* ,ti *6 rtgltt . to ltiseilrfialigo. T he. ' 1,., if the chit* 1 Ciudad; . .C;ionel .. 0%001; was liek:.etillipT; la' , Tie Jodge agreed:' bend of annuity, ti.. i the efiicittiit •d t 41101) 1 n yeuni .v at the e ther ,trio) es , . payable ttl the Plaintiff dev,ipg„.tkullite, df. . , ill*, , Sri preteit‘re i -ii 1 ' Ilighne , s the Prince et..litilel,' tied' the e " weilk pgincipel matters i . broiled to recov,er seepiacixe inueitytinrl' t ;.be tprie topnelly i 1 ;. There being ne.74eismlse,;:4les. 4urrereens:Aresiledi botkoldea, ..if..tliel bilk!. for the.P.4nlittifEAwAelall 11M911,04. 4104 4 In ppeeMtii i ti, an )4tiletlenting 101.i.kittni kit , lkal‘ l l4o l tIllY:J11 He 'night, thy , o(s) ) i did; rsseesing the damages at Int*. .1 whatsoever of thei . . . .. . . . . . . • ; . iii ... ti.... . r 9. PI