The Statesman. — London, England, 1809-12-18 00:00:00

1 . Or r'. 44. • .t . # ' 44. *i 1 ... , • ' ' • .. , • . . * : ~ i 4 r . .?-• . ' ,:. • 4, • ~ t r*: t . ' l 7" . . ~ • . si. . , : 4 : i .:,•„ . - ) 1 J I. I I h ‘d4la V 1 • 10 • ).. 1 1 k • i ~ / / ,1 • 1 1 1 k .. o• ;.• p live the orders I have given ; and yet oily Lord sem uNE of these persuus pas called. twill refer your Lorcl.hip..te a letter pobliitheti by Mrs. t'larke, in the National Register,';4' the 10th sf July last, and copied front ghettoe s into all the etas ewe,. In this letter slri: Clarke says, • 6 Colonel Wardle knew, that ;Otte, -Wright's " SERVANTS,. as well as OTHRB.Spcatt prove " every syllable that I bate swore." 'Qu the 23d of the same mentb, Mr. Francis Wright pub. fished, aiso, in the National Register, int4p. peal to the Pitblie t ,wherein he states,..." That 66 having racovereitifOm his accident, he went to West(eourue-place, on the 14th Of I),Tember, " and saw we there." He then proceeds thus,— " If Colonel Wardle has forgot ourconversation, " OU that day, I will endeavour to remind him e• I was assisting my WORK-PEOPLE in the 6 • room, I wltt...re Mrs. Clarke was sitting— " You know, said the Coigne!, I have gives your brother OROPIts to furnish this house tt for Mrs. Clark ; and I mean to pay you it notrouaeaev and HONESTLY." Now, my Lord, what is become of the SERVANTS of Mr. Wright who could prove every syllable of the case? Where ate those same WORK-PEO. FLE, aito were present at this conversation be. tweea me and Mr. Wright ? Where is THE MAX who brought home the mirror, and put ene in a passim'? Mrs. Clarke, your Lordship knows, (Mora, t h at this man was so much fright. eisellt 66 that he almost let the mirror fall from his hauds."(i) Such conduct, my Lord, should have sepposed would have mode an im.' pressiutt upon hirn. Why, I ask, was etc not produced ? But before, my Lord, I close my observations, upon this appeal of Mr. Wright's, let me sire yoer Lordship, 0110 other extract from it, as it regards the insurance, The passage is this. 6` Much stress has been laid, anti MANY is 011 , 4111TATIIONS made, about ley INSURING THE ; it is no uncominue case, for the Upholsterer to receive orders to insure the fur tisiure, inituentatily lifter the house is furnish. tt ail, because, he is supposed to be best se " (044;411 with the amount- of the value ; but • WHVITHE POLICIES ARE II IDE (JUT, IN TILE f • NAME 011 THE PANTY IT llELuNteli TO, WHICH 66 wale pie C se IN TIIIS INsTANCE, liiu 66 bisect 4 fly no means interested in so doing." The Nice fur the Insurance wf the 110'10, and Furniture t wag taken out at thoWestiiiiester Fire un the 31st of March, 1809, and like. • SNoFFIER, Fug WEARING 4IPPANEL, JEW tes, 4e. Note, my Lord, the Bosse and Furniture were tutored,. and the POLICY MADE OUT, IN Alas. FARQUHAR ' S name; and, unless the House and Furniture beloved TO VIER, how can it be e id, that the. Policy rcas made out in the name of the P.ssrly the Properly belonged to? The lee. were insured, nod the Policy made out, ate the Said ;31st day of M trch, in the name of Meg. Clarke.—lteally, my Lord, this dues ap. pear to me to be STUDIOUSLY done, by at minima AND IVELL-ADTISLD VIIR.SuNS."— . DUCIS nut your Lordship sea the ohjeet.—The Jewels were not ' uppiiga by Mc. Wright. :.Ira. Clarke, when rldbtor to the Tradesmen, suppling these and other unitive, and sued fur the money, could plead her Covorture. She was ever prepared to., defeat her Credituts; fur, upon what uLeasion, (rem Ittalt up to this tine, did Mr. Wight refuse P 6 B a il her He thereby, your Lordship, ob. . served, ioeutred no risk, because she was ferns - covert; and from the period at which Mr. - STOILINI BECAME lIER ATTORNEY, he certainly slot nut run any risk ; fur this de fotee was invariably set up, and her eredi. tors as tomeriably defeated. But to 'hew your Lordship, that Mr. Wright prior to the adoption of this system, did encounter risk, in becoming bail for her, J malt beg to refer you, to ass action broitibt agsellest Mrs. Clarke by Solomon de Young, in which actions Mr. Barnett was the At, torasty of Mrs. Clarke, and Mr. Wright justifies) as hoe 461, and was afterwards fired, with the payillosot of the debt and costs, in consequence of Ni,. Clarke not heing surrendered. My Lord, Mr. Wright, has in his answer, mops : lts these word's, 66 That the greatest part t' hut not all of Shp household, and other funti. 66 tore, of, end' belonging, to the said house, 66 Westboorme.place, was supplied, and sent in, 66 by this Dafendant, during the said month of 66 *amber 1808, or in the early part of the " month of January following ; and the re es e t ai•oler, some time afterwards ; but the porti cular days alien every article of furniture was so • sllpplipd And scut in, this Defendant cannot • stAhlep.rlo his belief or otherwise, save and " eicept,..that the. 4rst delivery of any goods, by I t this Wefistillitt, at the slid house, was Mille !I4 0 ,, t h e loth (lay pf Noember, 1808 ; and the 66 Nit, toy thelOth of May f v ffersalig,” • jy„/tw Mr. 1Yri;01. ' f ord, had an object, ha 4 he stated the dales of the delkery, and order', it tyould have appeared, that almost the whole o f the furniture was ordered, if not deli vered, before euy fcreiniunee with Mts. Clarke commenced. '"'"" UrehoLbrerst my Lord, throughout the ft-4de, do keep their books (and to does Mr. Wri.etrt) in inch ensimer, that slot only the date of eleliyery of every article, can he set forth, but, name of the porter making the delivery. +r Ids, my Lord, I was prepared to prove, but I ~e , teestood such evidence is out admissible in a Court o r j ustice. liotworve, your I,:nrdship, upon the nvaslon hu• a new trial, Ito h a y. sa id,—.• I feel A rea diffoulty in gramingthis motion duos 4104 far, oo OW( of the pciendaat I at tae same time • 44 Mee. Gi f 4Ell/L p tow EMT Wol}l, !SOH Tlll6 SECT Nl ea 010 S TWIg SNO. WITH TUC ' , La INTO F, s , M ei s k i irsorod to DA ol 0110 11 11 1 * Os his ZIOPINgth Peruar• iw.pposeVerthens!etilyeeteS *ft . s. ot 1 0 1 #1 . 41114 , t ? / P r ijoionstO, whic4 it. viva Ars 'CITE aNsiv laise " p pr#ASNIESSEENE . tAdnelliois ea do aolic# Tom to M iry aJ, at the time lAs °' &W.: l ft. Trot If hoe Once stß . er6.l Tear apiain! ; nett I mi. di* brilivt . "On l i ttle maltase( gems the Woe to and the henmegas with Ger, f be but 4. TIM STATESMA ptcost me, my Lord, it I adopt your first iinpression, and rtject the latter. It• • woi inevidencr, that no RIII wns delivered to me, anti! the rill* or soya, when it came, inclosed in the follow itieniits/;ikt forth iu the itt/Wer of Fra»eif Vl'right " F. Weight's respectful compliments to Colonel Wardle, " hue taieo the liberty to Wow his bill l and as the ankles " were to be charged for ready money, having met a mast " serious disappointment, will thank him to settle the be " lane.: for t h at parpose, will call upon him to-morrow " morning, eleven o'clock." Now, my Lord, I never yet heard, that tradezmen, were in habits of It er. et No rn ries of such sort of notes. I believe it In be unprecedented ; Mr. Wright had a 'naive for preserving a Copy of this Letter. The action, my Lord, was brourht rtrainst me on the '2d OF JOIE, THE DAY FTER TNE DEP/ BEY OF THY BUJ, and tried on the :id of July—why all this hurry? What purpose was to be answered by it ? I have not yet heard from any quarter, the shadow of ti reason attempted to be assigned for this haste. * I doom( lay stress upon these matters. as decitivcly she w Mg. a precorrerled scheme, to fix me with the pasamt of au unjust debt, bat I am reasoning on the rrtan tilt:Arles of the case. ns they appeared N 1 evidence. Let me, whilst I am upon this pas of the Case, bring to your Lord.hip's recollec tion Mrs. Ctarkesktter tio me, of the 14ih of wAv (e) a herein she demands of MAJOR DODD, and mysist.r. A JOINT BOND for 10,0001. hod the REMAINDER Or Watuerr's RILL TO RE FA ID air us. Why, my Lord, if I WAS 'ROTOR to Mr. Wright, should !Valor Dodd be this applied to ? If I hod, in the language of Mr. Wright, given orders to his brother to fu• aid' the house, and taken upon myself to pay him, " ho nourably and honestly," why. I appeal to your Lordship, should Mrs. Clarke, on the Writ os• MAY, demand of Major Daild and meself, not only 10, 1 1031. bat (hi remainder or WRIGNT . 4 SILL to be paid, nod that, BEFOR.E it nad been delivered TO NE ? What reason had Mrs. Clarke to doubt, that if liable, I should pay it ; or, did she think, that Mr. Wright had neither the means, nor the inclination to compel me ? And recollect, my Lord, sbe sworz, that the first eke A:ard of my reforml to pay the bill, was from Mr. Wright, a fortnight or three risks before Om trial. Mrs. Clarke, my Lord, and Mr. Francis Wright, were materially coniptdicted, by Mr. Illingworth—upon wham, nu imputatioa was attempted to he cast ; and yet it does Neem, in weighing the probaSelilics of thz case, hi, evidence was deemed unworthy of ciuu.ideration. Sir Ttirhard Phillips's evidence your Lordship also passed untaiticed, and Set, in welghinl the probahilities of the case it did, and does strike me, that his evidence is important; for he proves, dillinctly, a declaration of Mrs. Clarke, sae segment to the Inveitigation, that she was indebted to Mr. Wright Jnr the farniitire in 7u:siisn and was prussfi for pay tarot (1.). It sv as ,aid by your Lordzhip, that the evidence given on my behalf, onght to he looked at with caution. Surely, in) Lord, where testimony i. contradictory, caution, is equally iiecessarv, on both *ides and more especiitlly so, alien the situatioto of same of toe Defendants are considered Your Lordship. seems at a loss to guess, what could induce %Irk Clarke to make the discovery a hick she did, and un dergo, fora length of time, the examination of the House of Commons, unless. she aas led to hope for a pecuniary re coot pritee at my hands. The answer, my Lord, is not of difficulty; is it not proba ble, that Mfs. Clarke might look forward to a public Inyys tigation, as a means of inducing the Duke of York, ti. C• 111 ply usilA the clafwr she hal upon him ; and hat not TII c a r.- SUET evinced, not only. that such claims hate been attended hs, but, that a far greater sum than was originally demanded by Nit... Clarke, has been paid to her'—One point in your Lordship's charge only rem-tios fur me now to observe upon, and it is 11: is s Your Lordship asked why Mr. Canfield was not called to give evident*, as to the note I had written to him, urging the examisation of the witisesses at the first tail ? to which •I answer, that Ile. Cortield was in Court, apparently aid- . ing, and insisting, the cause of the Defend:low What I sta•ed, in this respect, needed nu eindirm ition.—l have the ; original Address to the " People of the !Juiced Kitigdatn" to toy possession, in Mr. Codicils hand-writing, and, ex pecting from the conduct of the Attorney-General, that Mr. Cortield might be called, as a witness, on part of the De fendants, I subptenaed Mr. Serjeaut Best, for the purpose of proving, if Mr.Corfield should have been put into the Box, what had passed,at an interview, het Weft the Serfeant, Mr. Coryirtd, and Mr. and that the sentiments of Mr. Serjeant Red, as to the condria and character of Mr. Corfielit, might, in such • ease, have been stated to the Jury. 1 have now, my Lord, tr.tvelled through the ease, on which, I bate h•miestly, coo " didly, and temperately, submitted to your Lordship, such observatimis as have occurred to me: And. in so doing, hope .out trust that I have not been unmindful of the respect due to that exalted situation which your Lordship tills. 1 have the honour to remain, Your Lordship's nowt obedient !tenant; 0.11. LL. WARDLE. gases -street, Buckingham-gate, Dec. 18010. A PP it NDIX. )IRB. CLARZE'S E•'IDENCE. (A T first knew Colonel Wardle ) about the end of feet As. Imo. VI bat 1 undersiail by Autumn, is from fteptember to the beginning of November. I'm sure 1 can'tevactly tell when I tweatne acquainted with Colonel Wattle—it was be fore I went to Westbstumr-place ; and it was in cnibequence of • letter Imo a friend of Colonel Wardle's. My acquaintance with Colonel Wardle commenced b-fore they became frequent.—W v aestalittance with Colonel War dle airs itiberquelit to the 1601 of November. Q. 114 Tis my other imam of providing for the expellee of the Osmium'? A. 1 had. at that time, not the 11l aNt means of paving for if-1 had none whatever—l was rcey DlilnEseeu IX UXED thro. THE ANSWER or FR.kNCIS WRIGHT. That hi or about the month of Moy, 180t 4 , the said Mary Anise Clarke returned to London. from whence she hatCheen absent sonw time, and look a reedy-firnirlial Busse in Holies street, Cavendish-square • and that in the month of Jut", MOP, the paid Maw ItediUrd-place, tuAkh he, this Defend aid had kept lie the purpose of letting it LADY reastsiiPt i I0J) unoccupied; and, at that reason of the year, this Deteod sit dot not 'street to be able to let, or procure a truant for the mimes red HE thsrefois ranrustu to the said Mary Anne Clarke. that, a. we did not intend to ass= to the couittry that -simmer, it would lie much cheaper fur her to reside in the said house in liedford-plam afervetisi, than to continue in the house she occupied in fielles-street, as be, this Orfcidaut, wonld let the *aloe for Jour guineas per week; wh.cii he, thin Oeftlalant, moth he was induced to do fur the little chance there appeared to him of otherwise letting such house at that time i although ouch trio wa, tusk sure Oran the relit Ott Defrodaid wan compelled to pay fur the snow tinder the istidleme; altholi;h thts Defendant had, previous thereto, Ist the same fur thirteen guineas pen week. Thai ur about the month of Asevember i lSuil, lite said /414ey Anne Clarlreinformed this Defendant she hart prbpused to take . * home it Wilthelitsto-plitee aforesaid, in . the some of Heft mirror:a 141zsal:Tti . I P IIII,2OIIAR ; and that 1116 hmd ticeired the person with orktimi_ ass had treated to mate AV Y FYilitClllll LI OF 111111, Ot:FEN D• KT and . which was th' he s t Douce sr hifui t matioa ibis Detendant Lad of wry. Aiming proposed to lake, or having taken, such housen Wc,ibutitsplace afilresailf and afterwsrds rOquertcd this thlrendant to finjisk ouch Mdse jiir her, but icAseh ht r4uswd said Nays Acme Clarke ibertepeop aim Deferestast le an *neva. thee she had soma EItrEUTATiON 01P PRO CURING 6 paatts4 Its pay for the furniture of sick home; stud said, that she 1 , /ituid infants this Defend:tut more es the oubject is t little lints: SIMEON DULL eameined by Mr. (ILE►o. What ere yawl 1 ems hoase-agent in hulks-street, Ca vendish.sqqare. Did Mr. Wright ensue ymi to take a home ? Yes, he did tome to lake a hoses fur Mrs. Farquhar fur a inmath—Ur it might he longer. Did he state nny reason fist that p STATED, SAO he, Mr. Wright. 'respells: to FURN lIIU A ROUSC von VER. 1)1d he state who this lady, Mrs. Forythar, was? No, Sir. Did you ask a his she was ? No, Sir, at is nut usual for as to do in. Did he afterwards come with a person ander that nese ? Teo ? Ise did, and sko pissed ander that name. hu did she anent ards turn out to be? Mrs. el. s IKE, I understand she ew. flow long did she continue in peer house ! I was paid my rent .10 Cie end of the Who paid the rent ? Mr. Wright wad ('.ipt. Thustpsom. What parsed upon that ittct•ion as to the payment of the rent? Air. Wright inforiqed ow, that he was coon,. to pay the real : and Out that was Captoin thampsan, a relations./ Mrs. Clarke's. I. rem whose hand did you receive the mosey ? 1 really can't say—it was between them loth. Where did she go afterwards 140 not knot, I believe that a dherirs officer took her 'Away frogs my house. Cross examined by the ATI - omit cv-6K3 Lb t c. Yearecollect, that when the reedit was given, it had not a Tien stamp upon it? o, Sir, Ldu not, as got the wai n . Ira you recollect saying, that as there is a witness present, It dues not matter about the receipt, Rad that witne-s aligned it ? I really do not recollect that there was any _perste' did so. I base menti one d unly that there was a Capt . Thompson. You are mistaken about Capioin Thompson; it was hosts 'her person whe sigred Ilse tee. ipt, anti L hove him hers.— L.nok N thahrectipt, and say what )ou re:ambit.' / I ro usember there was a dispute about the receipt. Examined in Chief. Are you quite certain that the person introduced was Cap tain rAORlp$O4 .1 1 I am su. SARAH MUM FORD. Where do you live 1 live with Mr. and Mrs. Bull, au assist them as house &grins. Do you recollect in Jesse, last year, of a lady taking a house. I es. 1 do. In what mime was it taken ? /a the name of Farquhar. Did she curve Mere by that name g She came teak Mr. Wright. Whoa did sbe turn out to he? Sh- turned out to be Mrs. Clarke. Do you recollect their going over the house? lies, lI do.' I west with her and M. Weight. lie said ii was a lady ss ho wanted a house to furnish, hod Mal sh. wanted a _tarnished Avows in the mean !loon. Did she say who was to furnish the house? No, she did nut. Was Mr. Wright present at the time was Mr. H'eight's observation!. JOSEPH CURT. What is your Christian name Mr. Curt? Joseph. What are you ? l keep a cutfee-buuse in Coventry-street, Hay ruin ket. Do you remember a person of the none of Farquhar, in the ',tooth of October, applying to you to take a Louse ? • I es, I d Wino does that person turn out to be 1 I uoderstaild That it was Mrs. ("arks. Did vim agree tot let her the house, provided she gate you alt sofa-tees for character / I did. To whom dtd she give you a reference ? To Mr. V . rig .ii, Itathboore-platv i her Upholsterer. In consequence o f that, did he call on Mr. Wright for her character t Yes, sir, widths half an hour. 'Pell us what pas.-elheitseen you and %Ir. Wright ? Mr. Wright was Mt his cornting-hue-e, and *clerk was there also, who retired upon my going IR. 1 said a lady Rested Parrish., had applied fur a house of mine, and that she referred ice to him. I told bim whit I was, and requested that he mould he' candid to acs as one trades:owns would be to another. llc said teat Mrs. Farquhar we+ A VERY a eseecraist.is Lau V, AND rnhv H 6 HAD El AD iCrIR.AL TROUSA NO eotimni or OCR IN NIS WAY Or RUSINZIIII, ARO 11AU UR FIFTY not:sr.:it sun SHOULD HAIR THY I:11010E OF TU BM ALL. Did you enquire as to UCH Bit No Nanniso or not mar ried? Yes, I ; he told me that she had been smarrien, BUT HE Dm Nor HNOW win:west usa stusnaxo my ts ALIVE OR NOT. Lil CORWE:IeIICe of that account he gave you of her, did you afterwards cal upon her ? I called upon here week or two afterwards. What passed? I said I had come to talk about the terms of the lease. DiJ day thing pass about the furniture? I conceived flint the furnitur: I saw in the (muse she then mcupied, elegant furaiturr. and that it would answer the inner boll e very well. and upon my saying so , she observed, ~ 0 , it is Sloe old la.ision., and that Mr.. rigAt would furnish it for her. How long was it antecedent to November that you had this conversation• with her? It wits ;shoat ten days or a fortnight before the lease was executed • and that nal about the `9th of November. I went in Wesbour.e.place to par :one money, and on my return I met FIVIICif lb right in tire King's PHs ate Road. and lie told me he nal gooses to tire house in TARE TUE UIMENsIONS rust 111. FENDER* AND csnerrs. Had von any conversation with Mrs. Clarke as to the pur chase of the fixtures; and what posed It:tween her and you upon that 'whin. ? I said I expected to be paid for 'ilium, upon giving possession; upon which she said, she was yen. short of money there, but she %fluid pay me in the course of the 'car. Did you acquiesce in her proposal? No, Sir, 1 did not; I insisted upon being paid, when% itell would not execute the lease. s at. Mr. Stokes, the Attorney of Alrs.Clarke, and the lease was draou out, and I went to his (Mice by appoint ment. In point of fact, who paid you for the fi xtures in the hivuo. Mr. Wright, by a check upon hie banker ; and l recciced tic money. SIR RICHARD PHILLIPS, examined by Mr. Cit.r tn. Are you a bookselkr ? lam, n bookseller iii Bridgeottreet, Illackfriurs. Had pia any emiversation with Mrs, 'Clarke us to the book you were to publish for her ? Yes, I had. Had yea any conversation ss TO 'Nil Dears? I had. Ix the course of your conversation with her as to her delio, did she say auy thin; us to furniture, Yes, situ MEN - TIONSU iIITILULARLT OBLIGAIION To PAT MR. SEM Atoll TTINO TO 2LIJOI. SUS MINN I lON ED TWAT GENERA LLT ►OR THE QV Tilt UOVSE Ir lt.TIIDOKI:-PLAt L. He y.r Ruud a% fit. as nearly Rs you can, the time you had the ttr%tconver.ation ? I think it was about the llth or the 121Ie u► LAST (n) Nov. ?6, lilo3. Mary Anne Clarke is delivered In hail to Francis 11'riglo, of Oxford-tdreet, in the Couto) of diddle• sex. Upholsterer, and Daniel %right, of the mate place, Carver- 4+64 taiklar, as Ms, asii-of Jobe Ire*, ,he younger, Rad William ilart, • (a) Eraknee of Mrs. CLARKE, With this full knowledge of the Mate of my affairs he ac companied me to Mr. Wright's, for the purpose or rig. chasing thegoadst he Went with Ms ro TAt.ttto Mr. nght. hut he was ill, and could not see him. Us came to sag awl he was the person who was to be responsible. Mr. W right was frinitined to his room with inilispiention; he met olds au acci dent. Q. Did Tea Nee Mr. Wright ? A. Yr., l accoinimnied hi* wife to his bed side. Q. Did any body speak In Col. Wardle. A. In consequence of this isidirporition of Mr, Wright, it wa. imprmilde for him to attend m the rrarehonse, hut M►. Daniel lEeighe attended him. I introdueed Wardle to Mr. I)aniel Wright. and raid, " That rat the gentleman rho was t0p5...61h my horse." - Q.. )(in baiy that in if 11E n It IN GOf Col. Wardle A. I dia. Q. ltrpeat what you said to Mr. WriKht A. 1 4.61. that is the who is to tnntiA my houw. Q. Did Cul. Wardle assent to, or diasent from, that ea presNion ? A. [IF. WAS SILENT, for that was the ekpresa pprpuse fur which he vreut. (a t) Answer of I'ltA)lCtti WRIT:IIT. And thjs Defendant further anon erinsf.saith ' chat ahait the haler cod of the imi4 month of ,iortaabrr, PO', the Wild Mary Anna Starke informed the Defendant, that the tootpktinaut was the 011011 to ith she'had finairlry alluded; and that he intended to tarnish the said !rotor in II esttriurar-place fur her ; ;pid that lie, thi: I)ereadant, gitiAhe _lsrlomed with the furio.king then:of; mod proposed la t*s 1,0411144 u( ill KM id hati isomer and *lire es I. , leucite desired A► aright hew an awrzavarw frit% Ms said Ceatplaixarsf, that there weight be MI 1111SUA DER ST-1N DlXt+ ea the subject. (•) Evideact of DAN I EL WRIGHT, 1 recollect Mrs. Clarke riming with Mr. Wardle. 111, Volker was then in bed. They were introduced to use owls, when I mentioned rot brother'. accident. I knew Colonel Wardle at that time; I hail seen him brier.. I sever 'aw him in Mrs. Cl3rke's presence before. When Mrs. Clark. introduced Col. Wardle to var. she said—" This is ca. 114'gr. die. who is come leak cut the furniture to . furnieh the " hors" for me." 1 am pmiilve that she represseed to me that Col. Wardle was the person to furnish the how. !Vie did this in his prrstnec—l AM PRETTY SURE 11.11 MUST !LAVE HEARD IT, ( G ) Mrs. Cl.llt K's Etri4esetr. It toak, I mipp.ee, two or three swaths 10 complete tie or der. They brit began to bend them in a: the rod of Lot e osnater, Inn I am mrl quite sere as to that : it might have been in December, or January, before Cie deliyerv.tir th e ar. tides sins cam pleted.—Affter sehic. t ha ordain dick were era. on Airs were sent back again. UR• DANIEI. wßiGlir s EVIDENCIL We eauesrted the ev,ssts that mere s?nt is Si. amount of E'IUU into Mrs. Clarke's haw or Mire, kilo needs Sytd, Cad they shwa put &ern If the nasal of Calms: Wardk. (u) EVIDENCE OF MRS. CIAR4E. I rernllect ono day a very large Mirror coming lan a room where there uas a large chandelier, when 114. Wardle was will me. at which he Sew into a pawinn. The Man Willi hrOlght ii alitin4 dropped the mirrar out of his hand. E think Ma ' •.r Dodd came in at the snow time, when h e an d Colonel Wardle talked apart ; nod nt length Mr. Wardle 'mitred the ea* to go back, objecting that the prier was too much. (I) Times New:riper. " Gentleman (said Mr. Alley). env framed frirwk ;ad mv " ardrdn not inepoilyakalk hack, and sageragruiloosati, wheel " we boon to bean lionoarable mita (Mr. the prose " eater's attorney) to bear the brunt that we ov4ht to fare. " We directeit that the present indictment should he Ow eno• " Fpiracy, :and nit perjury l and it we have erred, upun our " unit heads be the aim." MRS. GIARKE'S LETTER. TO MR. WARDI.E. I),:** 31m, M sy it, 11019. When I sent for you the other slay, and Volt rouse. sr flied by Major Dodd, its inquire of you how faryot; Int= Carr" into execution, y our promises too arils nie,!‘ sou seemed an.. willing tonci:vit that thee promises hqd horn mad., Il4li co..N u*r)un a 4t.y, in the event of the Duke of Kent soerresling the man whom 1 was to give evidence enough against to torn met ; this I deny, it was without that condiSioti. Them:inner that Major Dodd and yourself evinced, led me to believe that ton both felt yoarself under prumi-es you were unequal or an. willing to perform s and you thought to avail yourselves or! future promise., as futilens evasive, neither of which might nr can prevail. I will here put you in mind, awe more. of those promises, amt of soy expect/Idiom, which, if Voli value yourselves and clutraeteet as men of honour, von cannot hut accede to nor cars yes think I require soot thing but what l am most eully entitled tn. A' von sae Isolliirg is in yoar power at this present mu meat, I will lay down nry plan :—tkit yourself and Major Dodd eieer I‘TO 4 Jot vis noon (as ' . OO did in pro mise.) to give iney **hoe the space of too years, the mom of YEN TrIIItISAND rouN us, and till that time to allow me live huuslred a year. cominencing from last March, nod to PAY THE REV 41111)elt OP But.. This k not half, in value, of the promises given, 8s I will hew - rife. That as Illy n:4l Wistati iOne the protertioa of tie 9.15. e of York as sewn its 1 begun to stork owe hi ruin ( obi. it 1 had pledged nit msittpletc), he was to have the sans.. tion from the Duke of Kent ; in tomeotieJer I took we boy (risen the Dukc of York, and I have him now on my binds. ('apt Thompson 11';1* to have n situ:ohm competent to keep hi a its his usual way of living, and to try to get him rem/fated in the arinv ;he remains as lie did. I was to have my /Inn is!' I :i year. as promised lit the Duke of York (but not per for:mod). continued to ..ur• Ilse my like ; to haw: all ray skits p those eimitratted whilst I lived with the DeLie „r York, and wh.tt I might owe since blr. Coterie paid he twelve hund.r.l pounds, for whir.. 1w kept my furl item mos. 4invalioils, mold my present house of furniture. paid. these promises, most faithfully given, to be most samelit kept, and by ma believed in the firmest man pert or why ..misid I have refused, :sad exposed the Prop./444ms of ejftu - cute heist oat to me daring the lane of the Investigation o r A'ar ton Willi/W. Tiiio is quite ettough to :wooer the whole, it I &melees to say any thing of the litigation I base Owed myself and Nina, is the yisiw by the late proceeding , ; bat And you even thought. I ask, to pay M.* our or rook ow:s POCK cr. sou would still be tie gainer. jar ani; %%hat 1 hat-, here %Load to you, 1 cannot, in ditty to myself and . rhildreo. recede from. And 1 c pert you will lose "a time in making my mind (which, God knows. has been harruss.ll enough these sit month.) eusi, and comply with my w Woo, that r may cwt Ode the comas", to avoid, If nothing el..e, the pub. lie dale. I keep a copy of this ktler, and shall feel at • berty to de with i t tk hat I please, if no: attended to by you but of this 1 du not, cannot doubt, when! coos derail things. 1 am. dear Sir, Your moat obedient Servant, ARV ANNE Weetbourrie Place, aluane-quare. SPANISH PAPERS. SEvrt.t.a, Nov. 2S.—The head-quartos, of one army of La Mancha, are in Carotta:l. The ae. lieu of Ocana cuninictic.d in a manner which af. forded every li,,pe of a favourable isvue ; the soldiers repeatedly promised the Gl:twilit in Chid* not to forsake him, and every thing Imre the mugs glorious aspect. Thu division of Lacy repulsed the enemy several times with fixed havonets, an l behaved with the utmost gallantry ; but at tho very Moment when victory 16111ned to be ours, one of these unfortunate ecallinetat which render the fate of arms so precarious and uncertain, snatched it from our hands. The guards, the bat. billion of Murcia, the Carbineers, and some other regiments, performed prodigies of valour. Our army of La Mauch* behaved most gal lantly in the battle of Ocana ; and after having made great havoc among the enemy's troops, and imetained very considerable losses, It Nt back to the banks of the Guadiana. It will probably rally on that point, and make head against the wormy, w hom the severe loss he has sulfured will perhaps prevent from attacking us again. Thu two parks of artillery which are attacheat to the two divisions of our army of 1 4 * Mancha bare arrived safe at the head.quarters in Carolina, without one single carriage being mis.ing. • 4111.1.1: 1 Nur. 27.-41 l the letters from Ca. antiwitice a tresh triumph obtained by slur allies, the English. Tney state, as a eert.tin fact, that a Freti;:ii squadron which set sail* from Toil. lon, bound for the %dement Islonds, having 4qoo troops and 10,((X) muskets on board, probably du tined to arm the French prisuuers who are in those • ialautls, has been captured by an English squadron. IlVp shall won see the maritime power of the CiTeni Nihon reduced to a few hshiiig amaeks. Nov. 4.l.—Geruna still hold, out, with that nocumpletable valour which has added fresh lau rels to Owe, gathered by the Spanish nation. Ac cording t o the molt recent intelkigetice rewired frost O d 'dice y the !''vesicle itt4cltt.4 It by the gate of galleon, but experlcooesl W Ter" 4 recop liou thu pert of the inbabitaips, that they re treated with the utmost tweritskiti , m hutiny ,~ . I. \