The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-06-23 00:00:00

o ur of the Hon. Masher. The Noble Lord accori ;f ly sat down.) ,liter a .hurt interval. during whir - . there was a ro ,lete stvirssion of business, Mr. TIER Ncv ro4u. in his plare, and stated, that his sod le•.lrurd Frienul haul withdrawn to recover k ira sell after his speech, and ivuuld be in in a few Innate., Lord f'AsvLear wntt said he felt it to 1, hi. d u ty to wait the return of the Hose. I.;arned l„ ntlnoan. After the lapse of a few minutes, Lord I:Art.l.l'l'44u rose and observed, that the pe mliirity of tbe materials which funned the subject of the lion. and Learned headman's speech made it iut prtible for hint (Lord Castlereagh) to discuss them with :be advantage which he expected, and to obtain which he had rtoolvcd rot to offer himself at that par ticular stair, without the presence of the ii ot. and L tarne 4 441.de:usu. lie, therefore, begged the Boos raid give him leave to reserve himself fur a later part of the night, when it might be in his power to addres+ them ander the eireumAances sillich he thought ne cessary to the effect sif his observitions.—(Hear !) After a momentary pause, I*. „ N to t Galway) then addressed the House from t h e gallery. Seeisti: the House at that moment petfertlF pnocopiod, :se orn-hesl to enlossit to the I louse othirs:nusent in wiswer to the Hots. and Le inlet' tiren.leman who spoke last but one, and which he shou:rist insincible, oaosely, that the insertion of her 31ajesty's name in the Lliurgy, ur even the proposition to that aver, 1401141 be a total departure from the a•meenseat n-hiris hail been concluded at the late ne- . . Whlt tea, the agreement fiLig oust not be umlerqood to retrAct any thing, nor her .113jesty toatlmit any thing.—(Near, hear . . .1 the lluu. and I.elrne4l ilentletuan confine,' himself the leiral right of her Majesty to have her name in fo-tell in the Liturgy, his principle would have been reap 4.1 c. But he slid not so, I;erause such a coarse would Out 1 6 1 We answered his purpose; thervfore he _ . (Mr. B.) chow:: to solicit it, upon the ground that there Ras no cause fir her exclusion, confident that tile insertion ef her name in the Liturgy under the prevnt circumstances would be an admission of 'her innocence. Mr. IlaorGllAM having just returned to his seat, Lord 4:IIITLEURAGH rose, and, stated the grounds upon which he had F spentl ed his observations. ' Mr. BROI OHM" submitted to the HOW. that it was perfectly unprecedented for any one Member to insist spun the presence of another, and be protested against it. Since, however, the No , .k Lord seemed to be so POW. he (Mt. B.), with the leave of the Mouse, would Mire to Rome part of the House where he would hare the benefit of 'free air; which be stood at that moment tench in need of--.4t ,the same time that he would be perfectly within hearing of the Noble Lord. Lord Casrtsaanote mat willing to delay to any pe riod of the night that might best suit the convenience of the lion. and Le ,recd Oeutleman, to whom he in tended the coarse which he had first adopted, as a mark of respect. The House must be aware, that (fOlll the mtatmusillsomonsime is wirtele thlf lirbl_en placed towards each other by the late proceedings, the line of argument employed by the Hon. Gentleman conld only be met by him (Lord Castlereagh), and in resolving to have his observations heard immediately by the Hon. Member, he (Lord CI was actuated by a desire to as certain how mach they understood each other. The House being cot off front the knowledge of many facts, could not possibly understand the effect of many of his (Lord C.'s) remarks, and therefore in the ab sence of the only Member to %s horn his remarks could be intelligible, he would hese taken up the time of the House in vain. —(Hear, hear'. from Mr. Brougham.) Ms. Bnovonau said, it only remained for him to re move the suspicion, that in withdrawing himself at the siessent, he was not consdous of any disrespect to the Bowe.—(Hear :) • Lord CASTLIMNAGH hoped he had satisAea the Hon. and Learned Gentleman of the true nature of his mo tive., in adopting what enkht appear, without ex planation, an extraordinary course; and he begged to say, that hr felt great pleasure, during the whole of the unpleasant proceedinl.., in having to communicate with him (.lr. Brougham), and that although he dif fled with the Hon. !!ember upon various points, he was not the less inclined to bear testimony to the spirit of harmony and conciliation which the Hononrableand Learned Gentle g,an hid uniformly' manifested in the whose of the negociati.m. Haring disposed of this explanation, he begged to recal the attention of the House to the immediate subject of deliberation ; and in addressing himself to the various topics, which it els his duty to notice, he would endeavour to observe, as much as possible, the tone and spirit which had so properly appeared in the observations of his Honour able Friend who mused the Resolution. He owned, however, that there were passages it the speech of the tionosarable and Learned Gentleman who had lately melte% which were by no means characterised by the like qualities ; but which lie (Lord Castlereagh) assured the House would not tempt him to depart (tom the resolution which he bad just stated. He felt that it would be the most prudent course for him to adopt, to address himself immediately to that view of the ques tion that had been presented to the House, as the argu ments which he had to ol.r to the House would render such circumstances likely to be best understood. He meant first of all to apply to that brauch of the argument fouudyd upon the exclusion of her Majesty's same from the Liturgy. The Honourable Gentleman ' had said, that there was a concession which it was in the power of Ministers to make, and which not only would not be injurious to the side of the case, to uphold which it was supposed that this concession shonld be withhell, but would remove the only remaining obstacle to the completion of that adjust m ent most anxiously wished for by Parllatnent ; and, in addition to all those alleged motives for concession, the Houourable Member declared that the cundect of Ministers originally witk regard to this point had been contrary to Now be ( Lord Castlereagh) was ready to meet the' Hon. and Learned Gentleman n the broad admisebilli, of the entire responsibility of Ministers upon this He would argue the matter upon both the law eillk practice oldie eountry, and if he succeeded in Ante ing to the Hesse, as he hoped to do, that a discretion was given, by both the law and practice, to the ad visers of the Crown, with respect to the omission we insertion of certain names in the Liturgy : and if be also showed that the exclusion in the present case lOW warranted. be apprehended that the House would lirm with hie that there was nothing very rash in Ministers assuming the vesponsibility of the oeds4 -. .~.. _. ~... -.' z ... - THE •ion of her Majesty's name. First, as to the law of !he question. Had it been inditputably fixed that the inalienable rights of her Majesty extended to the ap pearance of her name in the public prayers, in that case Ministers would have seen it once that they had nothing more to do than ►it Ire r the provisions of the law to be executed as a matter of course. And he should beg to observe here, that there never was any retort ance on the part of Mhsisters to recognize the Queen of England under all those cir. uu►stances whirl) by right belonged to her, and would reml to the attention of the House that when the ar- rangetnents for the Royal Family Came under discussion at a former time, be (Lord l'astlereach) had stated to the House that lie should feel it his duty to propose some provision for the late Prince.. of Wales, then be- come Queen of England--so th.,t her capacity as' Queen was never once disputed. .11;ain, when the proposition which his linisters ha.l deemed it their ditty to have proffered to her were submitted to her, they were submitted to her as Queen ,if England, call ing upon her fur a surrender, nut of her legal capacity of Queen, hut of those circumstances belonging to her elevated situation, which it had he, thought miviaabla she should hl 3 ,- down. lie denied that the words of the Art of Pat-Nan:vitt resi.erting the prayers for the Kinz, the Q 1114'41, a!I i the 110 p I pr..zeny, peremptorily required the insertion in the' I.iturzy of all the indivi duals who represent d the characters specified in the Act, and he beggeil to state to the House, that the practice of the country, ever since the Act of Uni formity, sanctioned the existence of a discretion to he exercised by Government as to the particular names to be itiscrted in the Liturgy• At one period it would be foun,l, that the name. tot Princes. .inae and Princess Mary, had been i in the Liturgy itl.rniig with those of tii. King ;Anil tjno•rn ; at itiitotlsee time, the names of different 4.llier bran, hes were inserted, whibit Itoyal individuals, -1.)0.1 in the lation as the former, I% Cll . I ‘l.l uit from the same privilege at a ilifferent period of our history. In the reign of - George the Second, the House would ohserve, the I hike of Cumberland bail been prayed for; but upon the accession of his brother to the Throne, it was deemed advisable, hi consequence of falling into* more remote relation to the Monarch, his name had been removed from the Liturgy. The name of tke consort of George I. was not ins, rteil in the Liturgy; and this omission, it was well known. had a reference to some proceedings that were taking place in a Coo sistory Court at Hanover ; and nimbi it he said that the omission was illegal ? .gain, George of Denmark was not included. Having sliewn that the law and practice of the conntry were in favour of a discretion in the han d s of Government n or m this subject, thg re maining question to which he would address himself was, whether or not this part!; ilar exercise of re tion hail been wise and expetitetit. It had been by the Hon. and Learned Gent. in the course of his ad est, that the omission of her Nlikirioy's MiIUP took place in 1 the contemplati that linistert would have found it ad vieahle to propose an lovestiptio.: into hex ilni•e&r . sl coadasea. Againsethtettateidmit lie ( Lord l'.) utterly pro- tested. He could assure the House, that, when the decision, which excluded her Nlaj-sty's name from the Liturgy, had been taken, so fir from Ministers laving ' determined to institute any ininiry, or to make any other public use of the information which they pos vested. the case w.ts deeply the i event.. \ot did they entertain, st that time or since, any other resollition upon the subject ilmu that of exhansting every-pessibk means of averting nligt the) could nut but ctoisidsr it public calamity, and they lia , l hot very badly \ex pressed their frelinzs, if they had not already pro duced the conviction that they were determined never to sanction the agitation of the question, except in the altertiathe of tier Ma;e,ty's return to England); Ile would here beg leave to interpose a cantles against being usdirstoesl as speaking of her Majesty as a guilty individual. He wished carefully to avert the notion, that the whole tenor of his arguusesit did nut leave as impaired the distinction between a charge and cried, nality. But with every anxiety to act up to this dis tinction, be, as a Minister of the Crown—having before him charges of the grossest nature against her Majesty —and being placed in a situation where he must accept one of two alternatives, he would have acted with the greatest inconsistency with his duty, if he had given a different advice to his Sovereign—whilst he rillected on the serious charges before I ' —and whilst he remem bered that nothing was to discharge the necessity of an inquiry, hilt her Majesty's voluntary absence from this country. There were other considerations, too, which concurred in urging hint to mem 1111 l end the nicaaiare of omitting her name to his Majesty ; and he assured the House, that, as an honest man, an d a conscientiout Mi sister, he would rather sacrifice his existence than act otherwise than he had dent, Tinder the unfortunate cir cumstances in which be was placed. The Hot'. and Lessood Gentleman's remarks bad made it necessary for him Is pursue this subject somewhat farther, when he , (lasd Castlereagh), contrasted the character of these esliesis with some of the former speeches of the Mo.. ssil Learned Gentleman. If the Hon. Member felt that the insertion of her Majesty's name was of such im portance as be seemed desirous of making the House believe—then, indeed, he must have boon the most opine, or the most feeble of advisers, lf•he suffered the resolution of the Council, by virtue of which the inclusion had taken place, to sleep upon their hooks :for forty-eight hours, without one effort to vindicate blue privilees or the rights of her Majesty, which this omis sion might he supposed to violate.— beers.}—Even when the exclusion had been, on a i on aer occasion, brought under the attention of the use, what was the language of the Hon. and Learned Headman ? Why, he (Mr. li.) declared In his ph.. ts Parliament, that the complaint of the omission pi _boy Majesty's name was too insignificant for a illiiii bt—that at was a trade, light as air—and that the slip sissitios which the House ought to consider as Inger igr. r ass notice was—what was the legal ',sty'—(Cheers.)—The Hoe. sod L imp, ifested- uneasiness, even that it Imlkeingbeildieleary to urge the insertion of her p yy •• ism is the Liturgy, fur that ebe was deier• and the insertion or [mission of her name INAS - et Beak, was a matter wholly irrelevant . as ha 11 tto betosated so Queen. Weald the Hon. Member ;hi?? Would Le attemit to say, _that i l liaZotopinion from that wllli-13 he had es-1 r? If bee Ml4estfocoulidential servants thought, ed issaediso is the Llissqy of ao mach moment, why did Sissy peripit the Illiiiaters of the Crown to en itca• iserletidlittessee a delusion. -Mb (teed' t ) 01111111.111 spat As ta sV i t .s ies swine a cosivice moo gibs posithst is, . jesty had been pro.. edited ss theliovie is the oitadee, should not altered 1 sod It became sethhavy Wile to state, lisele he had net bees tets st Ate' is dielfflosehltib 141111' . • 'ATE& •:.• Learned Gentleman's presence, when he (Mr. B.) con sented to the condition that his Majesty should be understood to retract nothing.—(Cheers.)--Yet the Honourable Gentleman proposed now to bring back the attention of Ministers to a question n hich he hail no suggested at the proper opportunity. He would put it to the House, what sort of an advocate must be he who could carry propositions to the Queen. knowing that her Majesty's name was deliberately omitted in the Liturgy, and nut making the slightest effort for the as sertion of her privilege? Why did not the Hun. and !.earned Gentleman suggest the restoration of her name in the Liturgy, as the tint step to recognition ? Why did he not even hint at it ? The Ilou. Gentleman had con fined all his animadversions to the treatment of her Majesty abroad, and said not a word about the Liturgy. Why did he not suggest it, alien the proposals were made to her Majesty, at St. timers ? Why not suggest it on his return, when he had an opportunity of so doing in his place ? But he (Lord C.) would be pardoned for considering this entirely as an after-thonglit,—and one, too, that was derived from another camp ?—(Hear, hear!) I —Why did he not in the various opportunities that were subsequently giveu to him, urge the necessity of this most important point ? If the Hon. Gentleman was as sensi ble at all times, as he now professed to be, of the great I valve of the Insertion of her name, he owed it to her Majesty to have claimed it as a preliminary to all nego ciation. So far from that being his course, the Hon. Member, without ever noticing this matter of grave im port, carried three propositions to her Majesty, upon which she was to make her determination. lie (Lord C.) had no hesitation in declaring, that if the insertion of her Majesty's name had been proposed to Ministers, the pro position would have been rejected without qualification. Had the law been imperative with respect to the Li turgy—and had the right of her Majesty to have her name appear in the public prayers been indisputable — then, indeed, would Ministers have been relieved from a t painful and embarrassing situation. But from the moment that they came to the knowledge of the infor mation which had been laid before them, they felt them selves compelled to advise their Sovereign to abstain from any act nut made imperative by law, that was cal culated to mislead the country into an erroneous opinion. Upon the former occasion, when lie did explain his views upon this question, lie took care to separate her i ajesty s inalienable rights from those other appen dages of her situation which it might be deemed advis able not to permit to her ; and this latter description of privileges beiog allowed to her, would have been very Wiperly deemed an act of encouragement on the part ot a vernisient towards an individual whose claim to it was contradicted by direct information. It was the wish of Ministers that the question should not be prejudiced by any act of theirs ; hut when no choice was left to them hut to receive her Majesty with all the honours belonging to her high situation,but towhich they were bound to think her Majesty was not entitled—they had no other resource than the coarse which they had reluctantly adopted. lie trusted, !loiterer, that the iloese would aciasowledge that Ministers showed no pertinacious adherence to the course which they thought it advisable to commence — (liar !)—or to introduce difficulties in the way of an effec tual arrangement. At the same time he wished not to he understood as betraying a disposition to der say this!. They having submitted the matter originally to Par liament, were desirous of yielding to the feelings of the Weise. We owe it to the Queen to put the most I svourable construction on her motives in having come to this country. Rear, bear!)--But it could be pi) adsaatage whatever to 4bas Ida Illajaely's biloisters should make any retreetailea whatever of the principles they bate acted upon. Indeed, were they to do so, they might be considered es the 1 basest del of public men that ever disgraced the esientry. end utterly unworthy the confidence of the Sovereign or of the people. It would have been an outrage upon the Royal dignity, had they given any other counsel then that which they had felt it their duty to offer. He was not disposed to object to the motion of his Hon. Friend, because he thought it went to apply to the merits of the case, so far as was eotnpatible with its peculiar circumstances. Ile had reason to complain that the lion. and Learned Member opposite (Mr. Brougham) had acted upon what he should call a sys tem of tergiversation upon this question, in having first as signed certain points as the basis of accommodation, and then brought others forward withoet any previous 'abu t loii whatever.—(Hear, hear ! from the Ministerial benches.) —Frousseeh a system no satisfactory adjustment could pos sibly be aatielpated. His Majesty's Ministers had never re fused any thing which they were not still prepared to refuse. I nor had he at !ay time given any rownselto the Crown which he should be disposed to retract. The Noble Lord sat down i amidst load and continued cheers. Lord AtCYIU•LP HAIWILTON now rose, but was for some time iraudible in the gallery, from the low tone of coke in which he delivered hinaseW, as well as from the noise which prevailed. As soon as we could col lect the sabstance of his words, we found him observ ihg, that he had waited there long before he submitted any proposition on this distressing subject, that he might first ascertain what was the new , . of his Hon. Friend's (Mr. Wilberforce) motion, and to what ex tent it would go. He was not prejudiced by the opi abut of any individual with respect to this case, he , acted entirely upon the authority of his own judgment ; nor had he been aware how it was to be treated in the motion now before the House, till be had come down that evening. It appeared, however, that the motion of the Hon. Member was meant to obviate the neces sity of an alarming investigation. For himself, all he desired was substantial justice ; and he did not see that any good could result from the proposition now before the House. What was the nature of that ropositton ? He was the last man that should r - - r - - pass any reflection on the quarter from which it came, as he knew it proceeded from an Honourable lientlentan who sincerely lamented the unhappy differences which existed between the illustrious individuals in question. But to what extent, he should again ask, did that proposition go ? It was, that the party injured should he still further injured —(l'heero—sed that the Ministers, by whom the injury was done, should claim of her Majesty a para mount acquiescence. in order to entitle her to partial i s tan cheers.)—He bad intended before to offer 'reposin to the Home upon this question, but was strained by the Howourable Gentleman on the Trea sury Bomb, wise teasel of delicacy, and urged the pro phet! of abstaining flies public disclosures. But to him it certainly appeared that her Majesty would pin infinitely n3ore from say blic expesWoa of facts, than she could by this . There was one point is the apes& of his Hosennittle sad Learned Friend (Mr. ) which deeerted particular attention. It was is-that if the Meese shield give an opiate' that the Qatar ought to be reetstedee the fall possession of her rights, it would be a ditneepset, not to his Majesty, bet to his Ministers,_ who had advised their bring with. .—(Cheon.)—The Kier, ening tender their sp eci al Eke, meld sot be responsible fa the affair. ey i not, it was tree, advised' Ms Majesty to strike I tilieQueets•s name eat of the Liturgy, bat they bud ad viola its being omitted, which amounted, In effect, to 17 . 14 11 :71 t :b i l l e r Lo so re f rad as sord er , ta r atV r tl i re term (" l t tol d al nusi_ty,lser Majesty was renslar rayed foe o. as was LI I I:toy under the same `nation. Bat them ass farms notation of Ms Wee in the Li= a if It slboeld be Of itlits44o to Malt it wish bile, to saw no teases why It would not be equally so, as the case applied to the Queen.—(Cheers.)--The Noble Lord, atter some other observations to the saute effect, contended, that any investigation, however pe rilous, would he preferable to the proposition which had been brought forward to prevent it. What was de manded by that proposition: It was, that her Majesty should continually reside abroad, consent to have her name being permanently excluded from the Liturgy. sad renounce some of the most important rights whim appertained to her as Queen. Whatever might be the decision of the House to-night, he should say that th rround of the proposition which be should submit was immutable justice. The Noble Lord then moved an amendment, the purport of which was, that the Hoes,• kit sensible of the pain which the relinquishment of and of her rights must occasion to her Majesty, and felt convinced, that the insertion of her name in the Literal , would be the most effectual means of preventing the or cessity of an investigation which, however it might tem - Initiate, ontst be as distressing to her Majesty's feelm.s as it would be derogatory to the dignity of the Cron 11 and the honour of the nation.—(theers.) Mr. WILIIOr understood that the Illustrious Parties in question had agreed that certain terms should be pro posed, to which they might possibly accede ; hut then was no concession whatever on the other side.—(blear:) —And he would say, if any concession was to be made,, it ought to be on the part of those who claimed the un qualified recognition of the Queen's rights. He con tended that the question of the Liturgy was never thought one of primary importance in this distressing . affair, nor had any allusion been made to it at St.Oumer's. Mr. Liens, next rose to address the House. Ile began by stating, that he could not, consistently with what he owed himself and his Honourable Friend (Mr. Brougham), who was not then in the House, abstain from offering a few observations upon the speech deliver ed by the Noble Lord opposite. He should at all times find it a difficult task to separate his duty, as a legal adviser, from his duty as a Member of Parliansept. for he had not yet been a proficient in those nice distinctions of which he had heard so much; atuldie was ready to confess that he knew not how hecould bring himself, in this instance, to detach his respectful duty from his illustrious client. But here the observance of the distinction was not necessary, as there was no inconsistency between the duties to be performued in either case, for be who best discharged his duty to the Queen, best acquitted himself as a Member of Portia ment.—(Cherrs.)—Yes! this fact would appear maw. fest, when all the circumstances of her ease were coo sidered ; when it was considered upon what uneipi .1 terms she had come before the House; how friendless, forlorn, and unprotected was the situation it whiell s h e was placed, as compared with that of the persons w..) stood opposed to her!—(Loud cheers.)—When the cad.- 1 of her Majesty was viewed in this light, he doubted mat that it would not only justify any rational extent to which his zeal could go in favour of his illustrious client, who had deigned to honour him with her conti dence, but also enlist in her cause the feelings of every 1 1 honest man, whose heart was not insensible to such tr e pressions, injuries, and insults, as she had been made to endure.—(Repeated cheers.)—fie fearlessly and °peaty denied the charge brought against himself's:al hi, Hon. Friend, of having forgotten the basis of the proposed de sommmlation. That charge be should be always prepared to repel with the same confidence in which it hail Wu . urged. No tergiversatioa, us the Noble Lord would re esent, ever took piece on the part of her Majesty's ad s with regard to the question now under considera 'on. Ile could renal circumstances to the mind of the Noble Lord which must convince him of the truth of this assertion, and make him retract the statements he had made. That both parties had met on the basis thl.t zile her Majesty was to reside abroad, he was not disposed to deny, yet he had said, in the first instance, when ti.sl proposition was made, that he should not feel satistie: if her Majesty was not pat into complete possession ot her rights as Queen, and treated with that respect in foreign States to which from her high rank she Was en titled. Another mode of adjustment was then proposed, and perhaps her Majesty's advisers had gone too for in meeting time views of those with whom they had to treat ; but certainly they had never deviated in the least from the fixed principle they had laid down when agree. lag to her Majesty's residence abroad. It was true tint the question of' the Liturgy had not then been men ' tioned nor did he think it necessary, because he he lievedthat the express mention of her Majesty's name was absolutely comprehended in her rights as Weer% of England. This argument he should always main- • tain, and should be toady to debate the question over anti over again, upon the grounds that her Majesty's name must necessarily be restored to the Liter"), by her rights and privileges as Queen being recognirial.— (Cheers.)—Mr. D. then referred to the instant's ~ .f those Royal personages whose names had been erased from the Liturgy, and maintained that they were all In application, and that the rule, as it respected the -1, would have been more honoured in the breach than is the observance. Exclusions of this description refieet•ol but little credit on the Royal Family ; End if there r. as any case in which there ought to be a spirit of conci liation and forbearance, it was when differences en:sted shoat praying to the filliAT FATHER Of MENCT, to whom all ought to make their appeal; and whose for giveness some who were now present might feet tise•a selves called upon to implore, for the injuries done .o the illustrious individual whose emir he so hnmbly ad- . wicated. (There was, upon these words being pro- t. sams.ed, a solemn silence through the whole House.> TIN Noble Lord, however, would have it that her Ma-" jesty was of course prayed for in the prayer for the Royal Family. Admitted; what Oleo: As Troll might the Noble Lord have said, that her Majesty's name was included in the prayer for all sorts and conditions of teen.—(A laugh and loud cheering.)-- This was quite as good an sower as he could make to the singular proposition of the Noble Lord.— (Cheers.)--The iasertiag of her Majesty's name in the Liturgy was a duty which devolved upow the Ministers. Had they performed thdt duty ? As to the speech of the Noble Lord, it did not contain a single proposition to which the understanding could apply itself, lOr one sou trace which was not an answer to that which preceded t•.. —(Shouts of applause.}—lt was equally vague and in congruous. The Noble Lord had said, that the omis sion of her Majesty's name was a measure dicided upon by the King himself in his abaft. Who was the King in his closet ? Ille knew of no Kiqg in ,his closet exist ing in this country.—(Cheep.}—lflhey bad advised i i:* Majesty to such ,- - • ' •ny mu say that ' - King L " hossettrabie t Majesty to s RI act as would any WS lay chit the King had dos. what was just or goootteabl* t or rather would nee every saw *he had tie teens! vi honour aad justice about hies, declare skillets,' had Cog- ; gassed a measure of tisegreeseat iajestleso* VII witiol , redacted the foulest disgrace ea thaecaelre., 0 ,,, w : cheers.}—Her Majesty ••At to bare „bcza . a' QacesSEY din" w t " t ete i ge4 ' - ' 1 r asd an she ; : lrre er tarp. -,z hie . nadi sad mdl h Klee it was , het • w it the litig a te:a y T .. crik m • dlte e the pabhe tz ,to the gofers...a of the saliva; so the fsellsgs psrilee,won id there hare ftecoai an- ' sletaitsgis ratinstleg the ea sad rratorom , to- jestri siSa the asthma/ors al prayer? Asinrkily Nert 1 'mink .'s IS isiotors. bower. kat jumped t 44 . , tow^ tell retracted all of erlook ~ t — '• He itMeid se the Kes., atEC: who bad Ulu 1 *pp hat ft glittiot MP aftterfttfaad ; as 1 Ewe was of# TrloiNN'to orftlifttr_ I,eirt a. - 1110 61111 r•- ' cpeadittitty is tees ashapary ~ratilfttoli li • dtlhOoltaid V ~~ ,*a • . Z•.._ , t 1‘ i i • 1 . s. i 1 i l . Or i t . . . . 1 ~4 a , •' I ' , '. 1 ! 1 , 1 3 , ,1 r . : v , ) .1 1 I 1 ~ I 1 1 . 1 t t • i 1 i t I di ii i I . i, A i 14 i, lit 1 . I i 5 .:,• I: