The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-10-06 00:00:00

1- ! 1 .~ ~, • P atiable'oulioilti CA:44 !•-:•-•1 ro04:141!!.;"'. • ' • 11 liaridowation - did Ludy Charlotte Lindsay hold is 1 1 { 4uell!L talabliolusweL•T—Slis-wis lady of the heti cl,ra!Llgr. „ At OW 41.1 •Ilee leave kftp serriei?-1 think in t! e. mouth of.Nai JAIL . . " you . seell;el.'onntesi 'Mt at gist thsei—Yes. Vid you freVently converse Itb her?-Not fre quently. 1/ sante litureage did she speak ?—She spoke good 1 t:.;:an. with somewhat of air accent. 11.14 ycins Lordship a Cheek servant at that tine?- 1 tg. Did her Majesty Skew yon her garden Did any thing pattio tilar occur at that time ?- I%ctit;tig that I recollect. Dld you wall: ride —ller Niaje‘ty lent me bet der key. hors pm Lordship rrrollert at ‘clrit part of ►he far r•n our Lordship I lard her 31:ije4ty'g donkey : fir did not recollect Dist tutw Lordship e'er see your servant walk in these grounds?-1 do not remember. Did tnOy Lordship ever see your servant walk with tl:r Princess in these zriiiinils:'—l'ertainly not. DM yore Lordship ever hear that she walked with your servant in these grounds ":-1 do not think I did. Ltd yint ever state to any one that you saw your we wart walk with her Royal Iligliness in these grounds ? Certsialr tint. Does.your Lordship recollect a zrotto there ?—Yes the Priarem showed me a grotto, I remember. Ltoes moor Lordship recollect your ser%ant being there ?—',No I do not. Bid roe iLordship never state you slur him there .- 4:ertsiily not. I never said 21., for I reeolle t nothillg particular that could ba it on III) mind. Your Lordship mitht bare seen him might have seen Mtn. but I do sot molten it. Iv you; Lordship fond of riding —Not 3 rticolarlv. Was it the request of her Royal Highness that intluivd you to ride her donkey?-1 . es. Did you ride over the grounds attached to the Villa DtEstc Certainly, I have p:as•ed over 0. le VIM nd S. _ Were.yon 'attemle,l br yrotar .grant on any one of t`, a•r orrasions ?---Yes, sometimes. How lung did that per•.m afterwards remain in your service 1—.4 think hr left me •t Venice in the cuurse of theyear 1917. Hid ton ever 'any renters Ilion with your sister Lady Charlotte !Amboy on the subjeet of her remaining in attendance on her floral Highneis :—Yeq, I r e cu t• feet to Lave had some correspondence with her on the bid you recommend to Lally Charlotte Lindsay the pr .ptiety of resigning the situation Mich she held a:IJUt Ilse person cf her Ilu)al Highness did ad bey to resign it. Illot_were the cowl termini's which induced you to frire•thet advice ? Mr. 11111,11'1.:14M here desired to remin:l their Lord skt.i.; that tlis (1'34 a question addressed to points In sr; i.h hr had keen res•rained from entering. The I.urd txt 'Lima agreed with the Learned that the wa., t a king a n Je rr y ' . lar course, and it 'night indeed he advisable to ex purge the preceding question and answer. Mr. Canvey was then directed to oblitersite the pas sire froso his ewes. 1R red by Mr. Tex DALE —flocs your Lordslair reeoliget Ise sire of the garden ?—Nu. Did you vier see any impropriety in the conduct of t 1 e Prince“ ? l'hp•AgAnswgv-Ormtn.i objectakto this question. TINDALL.-1 bare nothing more to ask. Loral Roca-z-Wlien the Noble Lord saw the Princess r the like of Como, 0":01 any person with her?—Yee, Ber 15. there any other person in the Loaf ?—(We under -100,4 the atutrvr to IOC) No. lord Gars.—At any time when in the company of bur Royal flightless with Bergalsii, 'III you ever see s"c illOptOpfkly of COIIIIOII Of fillbillAtity between t' 7 --No.' °or Lordship havini stated that the Countess Oltll s7..iie-good Italian, wi th a slight accent of Lombardy, d..f yon observe any thing remarkable in the Lady d•• 1 not observe any thing very remarkable. Di 4 your Lordship ever observe any thing particular it the -mixes of her Royal Highness f—ller usannrrn ePr i tierftetlit noodrxi, inoyilyire, and he saw nothing that could be denomitiatetivolgar. Lord °atm—Did pint Lordship observe any difference between the. Countess of Oidi and the other Italian 'Airs ?—No. Lord Livegront..-1341 your Lordship consider her a woman of prowl education ? —I hail not sufficient with. her Morn) a judgment on that point. We you introduced With the Countess of Oldi ? Yes. As the :doer of nerganii?—No. Did you know she was sister of Bergami ?-1 heard ij before I went to Milan. Re-examiner! by Mr. TYNDALI.. While the Princess and Rergaini were tAgether, did you observe any particular conduct between them ? The ATTORNIPITAUNERAL objected to the question as too general, and as referring to matter not touched up on in his cross-examination. The Loom CHANCIILLOR was of opinion, that if rho question was admitted, it would necessarily let in tbo other side to a right o: inquiring further on the subject. 31r. BROUGHAM assurer! their Lordships that he should not object, if stub was their pleasure, to the withdraw ing of, the question. sessitwen CT THE PERRI'. Ry Lord Ross.—Did you ever see her Royal High ness in company with any other person in a boat on :bst lake of (:onsui-1 have certainly seen her in a boat os the Lake of Como: I have certainly seen her in a boat accotnpanit4 by another person. M'bo was that person ?-1 have seen her in a boat wktb Bergioni alone. B% Earl BRHT.—I)iil your Lordship notice any par tienfsit familiarity passing between them, when yon thus saw hit Royal Highness and Itergartil In a boar top- Cher ?—Certainly, I never observed any conduct on that oczasion which appeared to me to be indecorous. s't Your Lordship has already stated that the Countess Uhii had a little of the Lombard accent in her pronun ciation t• was arty impression made on your mind with reord•so ber manners. as well as with regard to her laagiage?—bi• chief impression was, that her manners were quite in'offensive. Were they the manners of an apparently respectable' and nosiest woman ?—I saw nothing vulgar or itoosdeal, la let 'lmportant. -* Did yen sver.efelleit whether ber .conveisstion sal deportment-ware each ae indicated 6 well-bmt wonnow or a Mamma inferide station In soe f iety?—l never ob served rte) particular vagaries.. • The adhmt-haid writer was 'hero ordered to refer to his : soot ortheir binishipc 'eternises! a doubt• as hike Mowers readsked to the two loat.9loPoory sad Mr. brougham sesammlidg flat 4154 reit anamer fs the bat isseiss was, List his Lordship bad saver ors / -.Bur • 'berreti .. " any thit:g sulzar ‘ "44.l not- " any particular • Mr. burner hs%in l r referred to his notes,•it was ileetn psi most satlittetorr to re-itato lite question, and his Lordship then admitted tbe correetne,s 'of his answer &A &Ito v r reeurtleel. no you recollert any impression retnaininr. on your mind after vour ton aaaaa tlou the Countess (Hifi, that cod trail conversed with a vulgar woman do .not remember any such impression. Uid yoo remark any difference between her manners and the manners of other Italian ladies cannot say I that there Wan no observable or material differs I trice: Isl Id not perhaps call her a person of great refinement, but there was no part of her conduct that was singular or ea” to be distinguished Prow the greater proportion of Italian gentlewomen. Hy the Earl of Lireaeoob-11)0 yoo consider that her manners and deportment were tl.ose of a Iranian who had a!I the advantages of a good education, or whit had passed her life in the best society?-1 did nut converse long enough with her to be enabled to !urn' any clear opinion on those points. How often did your Lordship meet her ?—t met her on two occasions, once at the Villa d'Este, and a second time at Alilan. I►ill you know nn either of those occasions that she was the sister of Itergansi ?-1 believe! was not informed of dirt circumstance on the first occasion, hut 1 certainly was aware of the fart when 1 saw her at Milan. liy Lurd EashiNE.—Tott have stated, as I understand, that you noticed no defect of education or manners on your conversing with the Countess 01.11?-1 had not the means of forming any opinion as to the mode in which site bad been educated, but it dill not appear to me that there was an remarkable dilfereoce between her and other ladies of the country. By the Earl of srovanost.r.—At what part of the table did year Lordship sit when von 'lined with her Royal Highness the Princetis of Wale. at the Villa d'gste ?—th the side opposite to her !loyal highness. How w a s yonr Lordslii;t places, in this revert when you dined with her Royal Highness at 31ilaii:—.1s well as I MU able to charge my memory nith the ciri nut stance, I sat at her Royal Lliglines,'s side. You hare already stated that liergami dined at that table; at what part of it dill he take his seat !—lle sat, I believe on the opposite sighs of the table. Ili! your Lordship receive any particular attention from her 'loyal —Blte always treated tie in a veg gracious manner. Was there soy thing remarkable in her deportment towards Reetranti ?—1 remarked no peculiarity. Where did Ilergaiars sister, the Countess Oldi, sit on that or!•asiou?—lly the aide of Iterg.imi. Who else were present ?-ILieutenatit I lownam, Wil liam . 1 . ustia, and a gentleman whom I understood to be an Italian phi-skim:. By Lord Rcrtretx.—Do you recollect what was the size of the loom in which you SAW her Royal llighoess and 13ergatui together na the lake of I out':'-1 recollect that it was rather a small boat. Was it in motion at the time:-1 hardly remember ex actly whether it was moving or nut. Loro 11011 2 .—While the Winrr•% and Bertram; were together. 41'61 you observe an particular conduct be tween them i—Ne. _ When the noble lawsl saw the boat OD the lake, was it far from the shore ?—No. _ How was Bergami employed in the boat ?-11e was rowing , . .• Hy the Pawl of DstunnTON.—Dlil toll never oli.erve any in thee!, eortment of Tier Itoyal High ness toward. Ilereasni ?—1 never oh il ;inv. W. the garden to which you have 3111'44 in the rout.e of route evidence immediately aojarent to the horse ?—The grounds were lai4 out about the house, and the olive garden enntignons. Hoes your Lordship know t!.e size of the eartion?—\o. liv Lord lhat.t.ii:vos.—Was your Lordship's aster. Lairs' Charlotte Lindsay, sliimi..ed from the service of the Princes.. or did she leave it of her own accord 'l— of her own irrorti. By Lord Ei.t.t:xnoam•cn.—Did you recommend her to leave the service of her !loyal If ighness ?—I On this question bring nut some expressions of dis approbation were tittered by several Peers. Here Lord layette tttttt suggested that he thought any noble Lord. oho wished to put any question should adhere as dearly its possible to the roles of evidence. The Marquis of LaNsnowNE was of the same opinion, and objected to thisspiestion. The Lord CIIANtIMI.OR thought the question ought not to be rot ; and accordingly both question anti answer were ordered to be expunged from the minutes. Ey Lord El.t.►sinottoccu.—Did you make any ob servation on :he manners of Bergansi ?—1 observed that they were unobtrusive. I took no farther moire. Did you ever hold an♦ conversation with Bergami —Not particularly. The only time that ever I was in a room alomd with Lim, was once in the gallery where hr w a s slit-wing me some pietist's. I' the opportunity you had, could you form any opinion as to ilk having been in a superior situation ? No, it slid not strike sue that hr had. Ills Lordship then states! with reference to a former part of his testimony, that he had an imperfect recol lection of having on some occasion remarked, but not as an extraordinary circumstance, that, after dining at the Villa d' Este, Ise had seen his Oreek servant in at tendance on her Royal Highness. Lord lit.txnEstrie was then called, and examined. Did you see her Majesty at Uenoe ?-1 dill. 1)it1 Lasly Illenbervir ever act in the suite of her Royal Iliehness there ?—tilie did. In what sitnation?—When Lady O. and 1 arrived at Gle nos, Lady Charlotte Campbell was expected. Lally Il.pro posed to the Princes., that as no lathes were with her, she should attend her until the arrival of Lady Charlotte Campbell. Did yonr Lordship, slarint, the time that Lady 41. was in attendance. dine at the table of the Prioress?—Fre quently. Harlot the interval between the 25th Of March and the 17th of May, we dined there frequently. Did you see Hergami there i — Every time I dint:d there. What did you see in the behavionr of the Princess to wards liercanti ?-1 saw the same behatioin towards him as to the other nts. He wilted at the hack of - r her chair. anti often helped her to wine and *Oct things which she wanted, and, as far as 1 recollect, he helped no also. j What was the heharionr of Itergami towards the Princess ?—That of a servant. Was it respectful ?—I 'lid not observe. If it had dot 'heen reipectfnl, I should have observed it. What rompany did her Royal Highness keep dat ing your stay at Genoa ?—ln the house were Mrs. Pal can't and his two daughters, Lieutenant Iloweatn Lady Vberlsete Campbell, when she arrived,. and bector H o ll an d o n most h a rm but not all. Also 110114, Atlloelo Noblemen. He ree;oltected one particularly, the Mar 'Ahem John Carlo Nee& • Did you see Lady W. Bentinek there 7-: 7 A.egeettt . ljr . 'iliknoa. • At'the house of the Prineetet ?—Yes ; a 1 a ha.' .1 . 411 not recollect whether st dioner.or so. , Were all the • people of rank at the hell. sine* lb. -Moen, ?—1 'saw. all ledloe.of r.Nb amtre. 8 1 0 at of 0•• aolikti tit of the slates r• Cross-examined hi doe So t:tfrres4 Did pout Lordship Ides is ?;•42‘41; -.... __. -. • 111116 ‘ 7 - 4.• 1N~.40100111, 7 7 sTArgsfitAN. Hon . -many dates dill yon dine there in a week upon in average F-Iwo or three. or more. • ' At thaptime wits Ifetgaiiii in the livery of a servant —ln the 'are's of a tonrier, as far as I recollect. Ifid-yott ever meet CaPaln Pet:hell. of the Clorinde, at the Princess's horse?- think I did. Lady Charlotte Lindsay called in and worn. I:xmoitsed by I*. LUSIIINGTON. hid you ever form a part of the suite of her Royal Highness the Princess of Wales ?-1 When did von first enter the service of her Royal Ili ?-1 think in the year IsOS. /id von attend her Royal Highness, in the year ISM *66 sate Went abroad F—l did. I believe von wereone of the ladies of her Royal High iess's Ised-charsther F—l was. low far on the occasion of her Royal Ilighne-A's tra velling abroad, 'lid you travel nith her ?—As far as Brunswick. What was the reason of your not travelling any far t:ter ?—lteesot.e it was previously un4lerstuod between her Royal Highness and myself, that I was nut to go any farther. _ _ _ 11'Lere did yon see her Royal nighties% after that 7 Naptes, sometime about the beginning of 31. Arch, 1115. IM I you then act as lady of her Royal Ifigneas's bed chatolivr ? How loot; did you rontinne with 11:n- Royal Highness on this last occasion'--I joined her Royal Highness in the beginning' of 31:1 rrh--remained with her while she staid at Saples--went uith her to Home, Civets, Vec chia, thence to Leghorn, and, at laghorn I left her. By whom was her Hoval HiFliness visited at Na pies all the En..41i41; of dktloction, all the Neapo litans of distinction, and all the other foreigners of con sideration. _ _ _ lie good enough to name some of the English of dis tinction:—Loral and tally !Imola, Lord cud Lady rompt;;Losi,r, Loral and Lady Hoge, Lord and Lady Holland, Lord Granriile Somerset, Lord anal Lady Hanford, Lord Edward Montague, and a great number of private Eneligla fientlemen. %Vag her Royal Ili:Alarms visited by Mrs. Falconet Yes, and by her 'daughter. Were you nith her Royal Highness when she went on :board the ( !urinate ?—Yes. _ _ _ Where did her Royal Ilighness sleep on board the Clo rinde":-- In a part of the C'aptain's cabin n hid) was se ll:or:0rd by a partition. The other part was occupied by the Captain. Hid any one eke %le, in the division appropriated to Tier Royal Highness :—Yes, her Royal Highness's Du you reeoPeet any thing arising in conserinenee of divi.don of the Captain's cabin :—Yrs, her Royal Highness expressed surprise that the cabin had been divided. _ Do vott ree.ollect any thing arising In consegnence of the cabin being divided into two parts ?—Nothing par ticular, except that the Princess es;sressed some regret that the oilier parts of. the cabin bail not been appro priated to me instead of the Captain and his brother. Hid any difference arise between her Royal Highness and the Catain in cor.sequence —Nnt that I observed. During t he time ywa were in the seruire of her Roval Highness do you reci.llect a person of the name of Her gaud in the service a her Royal Highness ?—Yes. In what capacity - :—As a courier. Had won opportunities of seeing the demeanor of her Hoye! 'Highness and liergaini towards each other ? Vet, very frequently. In what man' ier did Bergami conduct himself towards her Hayti Hiyliness ?—As A servant. Ilan did her Royal Highness conduct herself towards him?—.%s a mistress generally does towards her servant. - Ditl you ewer in yonr life observe any impropriety be tween them whatever:—Sever. ‘Vlie:t did yon quit the service of her Royal High , ness:' —1 tentlrred my re signation in the year 1817. What was your reason for doing so :'—My brother wrote to me requesting I would resin. Have yon seen her Majesty since she has been last in 1 this country t—Yea. Cross-examined by Mr. Souvroa-Cirsan it.. How lung was it before her Royal Highness quitted Naples, that . your Ladyship joined her •:—About 10 or i 12 days. How u►nch time was c-copied on occasion of their journey to Rome ?—We s ere one night oil the read go ling to . Rome. two nights at Rome, silt nights at Omni 11'e-et-hie, and 1 think three nights on board the Clorinde. Then vont Ladyship .11,1- not rater the service of her Royal :Ugliness afterwards ?—No. During the time you were at Civetta Vecchia did your Ladyship see Bergausi ? les. Did your Ladyship never see him walking with the Princess?—Her Rural Highness and 1 walked out to gether and he walked a little distance behind. • Hoes your ladyship mean to swear, that that was al ways the case ?--As far as 1 can recollect it was. Was any other courier in the service of her Royal Highness?—Yes. 1 believe Hieronynions. Did he eve walk out with her Itoyal Highness ? No. liner often baeo ron walked out with her Royal High ness ?—I think about three times. ... __ Will your Ladyship swear you did not walk out six times at Chaste Vecchia ?-1 will. Pour times?-1 cannot swear certainly that it was not four times, but to the best of my recolli•ction it was not more than three. But Beer:anti walked out each time ?—Yes. And will your Ladyship venture to swear that on no one of those uceasionsßergami and the Princess walked site in arm do not recollect that they did. Will yon swear they did not ?--1 have no recollection lcbalever that they did. Then I am to understand that your Ladyship will not *Wear they did not?--1 have told you I have no recol lection whether they did or did not. But I repiat, Wilt you swear they did not ?-4 cannot positively swear, but I never saw them. If such a C.ing had happened as that her Royal High ness walked artia in atm with her courier, would it not have struck you ?—Yes. Then yon never saw it?—lt might have happened that eipon some 'particular occasion she took his arm, but they did not walk arm in arm. You were Lady of the Redchaulber ?—Yes. l'ben from that situatiou you had frequent nail* 141 thelsed-cbanzber I—Yes, I bad at Naples. Was her Royal Highness always alone in her bed ,ebatibei ?—:No, sometimes other persons were with her. the you retoetnlter ever seeing Illergami there ?.4. 4 ,1 h e r Royal It ighbeie alined sometimes an the beeloqueik with young Austin, and ltergami waited. • • . . that happenfrequently at Naples ?—Tes, li.lllo,- , egust her whenever Royal Highness had not coustow . Ibiser, excepting one day 'wins I bad leave agile go to Pompe:i. • { any other perion dine in that room ? —No. • you sweat that Dergasut waited on *pm 40011 A *Link he did • but I canuot positively swim.. % did you gait d er &y id Hithsess*?-I*4es AT. •• • Ilssl my applicatide bees shade to J ose )911k tot R ontillighaass thissmay beloit i rm•bad regaled* na i l h er f-.Ter, I cannot say boo: long before. Wee airy*rnitide• trade byrilgiPc C 4 14 4 14 Lissisay . . • ... • .• ••••••• _ 7 4 k ; ; o ' Mr. IllenzunAn objecteil to epies!ion. This was txactlr the line of ertma-exansimitiut t whieti the other side. ;tiler two boors nrgstment, krl rev% roti-ilhion from taking soil he therefilre it'd wit ...re hi it shonl3 he taken by his 11,e;tro.d Friends. There WA., at all in the iine.ition of any eoli.ivirien-e ; 1.• It a• h e b a d b ee! . prevented ex.nuitting in the same nay, lie clitisr to ob ject to it. The Lord ('ita NCISLI.ON scat Ainilt to gi% e his npin:o e we collected in favour of tile ioi , titio I i.rii I cries adjourn and go on) when :11r. I '• l tit, tip the objection. any thing to sate youi time.' The Loan eIIANCILLIAII said if the objection was-well Founded, it could not be xi; en op by the t otto.A, he canse it was the duty of the Hour to sari- no tinestian to he rt which was improper. lir .tizitestr.l that I'm House should now a(jouru and consider on this point to-morrow. The House accordingly adjourned at 4 Alock. until to-morrow. 111611 WATER AT LON DON To.moßtvb. .—Evening, Iti riff, s!ter Alorniny. 5,4 min. after 1 PRICE OF STOCKS THU Hank FAoek 3 per Cent. Roll. II per Ct. Cone. ("Cii 11$ p rr rebt. I per Cents. o pr Ct. Navy 1041;i Long Ann. lop. 3 per Cent. Ann. AT ONE O'CLOCK Indira Stork YIA Dilto Bonds its. pm. Did Aanuities F.C. Bilk td. IL ti. pm. Ditto Corn. omniana 311 din. Con. for .1i•co•lot 13,1 A Lou. Tickets tit. J. Cbc tattOman. • THE BRITISH STATESMAN" IS INCORPORATED Inn " TUB RTATIISDAII." LONDON:' TRIDAT E•ENI NG, Ot TOM 6. 1920. THE QUEEN. 1101:0*. OF 1.01t05.--(Tisis Ifunxiss.) There was an unusually full :men lance of Peers this morning. After pr.•yers their Lordships were called over. The def.itilt , r was the Duke of Argyle.. and among the excused abseisiees wa, his Royal High ness the Duke of York. Before the calling in of Counsel, ilfarietti appensoll at the Bar on the motion of the Lord Chastener, and ti . :o examined by th.• Mor. i iiis of Lansdowne. The ob. ject of his re-appearance was merely ;o produce a letter he hail received front Mr. Alhertonio, and to which he had referred in his examination of yes•crilay. Having given in the letter, he aildre.:r.l the Ilouw, and begged their Lordships' would to cor rect au error lie had made in his 1-comination of yrs. terzlay. In that examination lie sr 'tett that a letter front 'his father, dated the idth ult., had beau received by the vost. He now begged to 011-ervo, that on re ferring to his paper yesterday, h, found that th.• letter in question hat beau delivered by the band of a friend. The witness was then ordered to withdraw, and Counsel were called is. After a considerable pause, several Noble Lor Is called out " Do on," and un the motion of hlr. Brougham, Lady Charlotte Lindsay was brought 11l the Bar, and Mr. Solicitor-liesteral proceeded to her ems-examination, having determined to give up the questing which was objected to yesterday Ili; . 'Mr, Brougham. Is there a garden in the neighbourhood of Naples called Esereila ?--There is. Doesyssor Ladyship recollect haring walked with her Royal Highuessin that garden ?--Yes 1 I did mire. Was Bergatni present on that occo.:iun ?--Ile was. Did your Ladyship travel front Naples to Rome in the sante carriage with her Royal Highness ?-1 did. Did Bergami ride as a courier on that journey He did. Did yon travel in the same carriage with her Royal Highness froon Itotose to eivetta Vl . erlll ' a ?--Yes. Did ilergaini ride as a Courier daring that part of the journey? - 1 believe he did. but on this subject I ha, e not so certain a recollection as I have with respect to the former part of the journey. Does your Ladyship recollect the cirenmstance.io the former part of the journey, of Bergaini cloning op to the , carriage window and addressing her Royal Highness in French:—'. recollect the circumstance of her Royal highness giving him some refreshment from the car riage. lint can your I adyship say that lie w sscalled by her Royal Highness?-1 think lie was. Then I am to understand that your Ladyship las no means of arriving at certainty u;ssii this poiut?-1:0- doubtedly, I cannot answer with certainly. After your Ladyship had made up your mind to quit the service of her Royal Highness, did you not say that it would bo a vast relief I o your mind to quit Pier Royal Iliglinesa?--1 do not distinctly recollect saying so. If you do not distinctly recollect the words, do you remember &tying any thing to that purpose or effect ?, No. I might have said it, but I don't know that ever I did. After you had come to a determination to quit the service of haw Royal Highness, did you not say that such a determination had been a vast relief to your mind: and at the none time did you not say that no woman who bad any regard for tier elawranssr model remain with the Princess ?-1 certainly 010 not recollect saying any such thing, in any seek words. bid you ragoietuber saying anj thing to that effect ? No. Will your Ladyship undertake to say that ,nn dill Ant state the very words which I here made use of?—1 don't recollect using any such words. Ash Ito understand that you will not nndertake to . say that youidid not make use of these words?-1 ippon to sty tubst I did not snake sae of the very wools. I •• , s don't recollect such words. You had before said that you did not recollect. The question now is, whether von will my that you dill . eat • .... make nite of theft words f . --1 can only say that l is extreiniely imprt.bahle. Then lons not to understand yen to say that !her . '" were•-not nosed ?-1 don't resmilect ;it is illaPussibl•• . • Ato I to nosientmal that you will say you did not use -. '. words to thanoefest noon than owe ?—I have no mei- • lection of Insist( wood wuris to that effeet. • Then lam not so knakratand that yon will say you . . did not Ilse amok otpteialows more than once ?----t can only &visite? as beak. •1 Infra no iseollertioa, and lola - ' not think•it probshle. . 1)1d vapor Ladyship nener.saty no quittiog the tunic - . . :2" 40a 11 flitbstos• t it was. wet foe ma riesa. :• , , re to.amist-wedetalu sidnal'fronp ;oat sasinglif , 16 , sarvie!, that Fos ' alum( it. before ?-4.1 do . , 4 .......,,,,..,, if-. lo- possible 42,141 . ! liitladY Va. ____,, 1 1 11v 4 hf 11 4 .14P 1 lode tilinipilions 1s yosieLaily- „ . . -. .. - , . ~..•___4o.l • 1 , P I 1 / i