The Statesman. — London, England, 1819-05-01 00:00:00

l'ilE S rATESMAN; LAW INTRI.LIGhNCE. COURT OF KING'S Aram ;0. ARTICALFs OF TIIK PKAFE. Tilt I%RL OF lIMILET V John 11111 h. Karl of Dagoley, Visrosof viol* hiln Court. and by the steal coartosy, took I.it ►qt On the Bench. Ills I.nrclthip then eshibierd "id" of oh" Posey ovinto Mr. 11lino.. Thew wore of Frost 'owl,. and rootalood there., ageing, the latter. of haring followori the Noble Earl in France, Jody, sod England, gluey, carrying yistols in Li. pocket, mod •sing langosge, sod coudoctiog tiarself in • way Which end.orred the minimal safety of his Lord. ►hip. It will be rworearberod that the conduct of this Gentleman For been bolero the l'oblie on former cr e ob i em , o f et. atterv, on the eshibiiiiro of the Noble Earl. Whew the anklet had been read, t►e of Darntoy wit swore to thee. Mr. Graxer, his Corrosel. stated, that as 114. ].o►dship did riot wish to wee► for a warrant, he Otoold merely mote, that the Gwent would oblige Mr. Wish to site 'Toper wearily for preser►iog . . The COURT lied together, end orde►ed that Sir. MO should Ilse severity, himself in 60001., end two sureties in 30001. rich, for fire 'ears. THUM; V. ALTER, AINNEAII, WOOLF, LITT, AND OTHIRS. It will be recell•eted that this was an indictment ogalost the Defendants for • conspiracy. in having eel ep certain of thew, who wore Morally beaters. for opolent onerchante, in order that, by their means. they right fraudulently obtain largo quaotitios of emit. The case was tried before th• Lord Chief Justice. al (I•1Idhall. and was Teri' folly reported in Tix STArtsmist of the 41.1 and 4441 of - fhb month. A ..rdkt of Guilty was returned against Kisumu, lin•lL_and Levy. _ _ _ Mr. Scautari, who was Counsel for Woolf, new snowed to set Bride the verdict. He stated, that the trial had lasted two days. On the first day, it cc. espied she Court from the time of it, sitting till eleven o'clock at night. The Jory were then dig petted, and slept at horne that night. This was sap. posed to be an irregelatity. Ills Client had sworn that he did net knew the fact before the verdict was delivered. Mr. Count; SEP./WANT, who was Counsel fee Levy. mid, that he had a similar motion to make. Ilis Client bad she sawn that he was not 'Ware of the separatism et the Jeri till afte► the verdict. Mr. D&XNAN aid, h; had the some motion to mike 64 hie Chest, Kinnear, supported by a simi lar elitlerit. Mr. SCABLtTT mid, be yell clearly of opinion that 11:e proceedings in this cave had brim Jumpier. He had not had meth time to look into the hooks, bet be cemetived that the aothoritivs which be had con sulted were is 'Motif of his application. Ti.. first eau shish he had met with on aria subject was that of 1 ' Roam v. Smith," reported in Sir Gefre, Pollster's Reports. my 380. Trio. 21. Jet. 11. R. It we. so action of +omen', sad aroma verdict had been given for the Pisiatiff, the Coed was informed, that three of the Jery hod sweet-mesis sheet them, bet that they had net brew given to them by either wf the [mum, and that they had sot oaten them.— The Court said, that that did trot reader the verdict suspicious, bat that it was finable as a mistleareanoer. It was also awed, that the lfailil who had custody of the Jury had not been seem. TM Secondary said, that it was not usual to swear Ma. The Clerk of the Crowe and his Secondary mid, ihat it was ? usual in Meisel caws. The Chief Jerk, Lea, then ordered, that in future the Bailiff should be sworn In • civil as well es in • cassias' case. The seat as which the Learned Counsel had found was that of Lord Dolaerre, who was tried before the Lord Iligh I Steward for High Treason. (1 Jet. ) That case was reported in 4 ll.rgrmu's St. Tr. p. 210, its which Lord Chief Justice Ilorbert mid, that la a Trial by Jury, the Jury could not be discharged till they had given their verdict, lest they might be cor mewed I and that it use meal to seem an dicer to keep thee. The 11 , st case of misdermamar which hi bed met will, was that of Dist betk Canning, who was tried at the Old Wiley on the 29th *1 April, the Ist of May, and I cisjs afterwards. In that ease, it did not sppear what bad become of the Jury. The Jury hroeght in a verdict, peaty of perkily, bet not pill of wilful and corrupt perjury. They were laid that that verdict could not be received, whom they retired and returned with another verdict. Mr. Gvantv, who was Counsel for the prows. lien 'sabot the present Defessdersts. staled, that on the trial of Hardy, Mr. Jetties, Boller said, that Mr. Atavisms Newman had informed hies, that in Can. oing's case the Jury slid separate, far be had spent Si., evening with use of limn. Mr. SCAOLITTNid, that whether that were dose by consent or not did not appear. It was, therefore, rot a precedes., either one way or the other. In cases of felony, nod I. cams of treason. the rule weight bedlam's' from what it was in misdemeanours; bet he was not swore of any mesas for that distioc. lion. The noses for not goalies the Jury le sopa. sate was, that they might not be tampered with by nun side or tbe ether. Tim present was • proseco. ties which bed excited In tho city of Londe. a very great eassation, and some of the papers, after the proceediogs of the brat day, lad published a very strong epistles on it. It was a remarkable fact also, that wises the verdict wee give', there was a public reclamation in the Omit, which showed that the verdict was highly prised by those who beard it. It was very encoussioss is Ibis country to hear saclike's. lions in • Coon on a verdict of conviction, thoegh thee were sometimes heard no verdicts of acquittal. The Loss Culls Juvrtr• observed, that there •as certainly a shoot of applseso when these De. fer.da ate were convicted, and ha was greatly ashamed of that iodecorem. r. Sc.% itt.t.TT continued. Ile said that he hadjast recollected a rase which saw tried at 'look, before the Lord Cbiel Duels Thoaspeon. In that ease he • as Counsellor the Defendant. There was an ed. j tararecut ef the Court, and be prayed for it. The Chief Baron allowed the Jery to separate, stating, that he relied en astir heswer that they would not •• bet soy aloe to welt to them. Mr. Justice Dm etwerved, that he remembered • t*se, in Saucy, for en assault ors a Custom Louse E..er, its shads the .119 gm, safF:tctl to divert,. Mr. Sceitivire, in camisoles, sell, that in tbe este of Lord Cnebreee, the Jory did ma & s p. ' s. ; they were attended so their roes by on Officer, end kept together. Mr. Guinew believed Oust the , fact was otherwise. lie bed esiderstood frees ono of the Jery whom he row lately. that they went knew, and lb. ',oersted Jody, desired dem sot to bete soy coesseeication wittribor body. Mr. SCA aurrt repelled his opinion that lb. Jury could not he disclarged, or be allowed to separate, till t►ey had giv►n their verdict. It was elver that this was t►e ancient practice, and the reason of is was for fear of corruption end tampering with the Jury. An orncer was sworn fa keep the Jury too amber, without permitting Mont to separat►. or any one to converse with them ; for though the law re quired that honest mea shoelti be reterned upon Julies (and without a known objection, they were presumed to be probe etkgnks hombres), yet, in the tangoes, s.f Lord Chief Jessie. Iletbert, they were week men, and perhaps might be wrought upon by sedge applications. 111 r. C 03161011 SIZIJEAI4IT said that hi, Client (Lowy) had sworn that he did not know the feet of the se. potation of the Jury till after the trial : he op. pteheadird that it we, the practice of the whole Cri. &sal Lew, from the earliest time, that the Jury should not be allowed to disperse till they had given their verdict. The 'practice *es not confined to tree. son sod felony, as in the rase reported In Sir Gefrey Pelmet ; it was held that in all eases a Bailiff should be sworn to keep the Jetty together. It was a prin. tire of law to keep these from all *sternal influence; and unless turret consent be given by all psi. parties esinatined, it nes a inis.trial, and the I Jiffy had acted in a way that would avoid the vet. diet. This, he contended, was the general principle. Ile would now trouble their Lordships with some roe.. which be conceived to he directly is point. lo the book, entitled Trials Fer Pelt. p. 249, It mei de. elated that a Jury ought to be kept together in some ient place, and that none should be suffered to speak to them. 1• the present case the Jory had dispersed before they received any casting from the Learned Joke: is fact, his Lordship was net swat• that they intended to sepersty. If is any core the dispersion of • Jury could he dangerous, it was par. titularly so in this case: for here • great ferniest war recited in the peblic mind, sod the verdict was received with shouts of applause. In Trials per Pais, p. 252, which retorted to Cr.. car. 189, it I appeared that after the Jury had retired to consider of their verdict, on, of the witnesses bad hymn es. entitled by them; and though it appeared that th e I 'widest* so given was to the some is effect as float given before, )01, on complaint to the Count, it was held that the verdict was not good, sad a new trial was awarded. In the same book, p. 283, in the case of Webb at. Taylor, la Tiles. Term, 1663, thei verdict was set •side, because the Jury, without con. wet of the Court, had taken with thee pares eon. ',meted with the ramie, parts only of which bed been ; reed in evidence, though they declared that they had not reed them. la Ron. Turd. p. 716. pl. 20. it is I said, that Urn of the parties say to the Jery after l they ere gone from the bar, s• Yes are week men, it is as clear of my side es the nese in a roan's face;" this is new evidence, for his •liretatiow nay muck pomade the Jury ; and therefore shall goes\ the verdict. go is Prat's ass, 21 Jac. Roll. ?Wel. 716. pl. 19, if any thing be read to them which they eight not to have with them, as • book of deposi. lions, some whereof ware reed in evidence, the vet. diet is bed. In 11 Hets. 4, Roll. Trial. 714, it up. posted that the Plaintiff delivered an escrow to a eers.n empanelled, before he was sworn. who ef lierwards being sworn, and gene with the Jery from the be,, to consider the verdict, showed it to his ' companions, oho frond for the Plaintiff. The Mi. sister who kept the inquest informed the Court here. of, nod the Jury being essmised, confessed the met. tee, ern which judgment was stayed. From ell these authorities, end portirelarly from that Is. Lord Delamere's raw, and the ease in RoU last genteel, the Learned Unrestl contended, that the Jury right not to be allowed to disperse till they had do. livered their verdict. In this core the Jury were ve rsed for several boors to th► inconvenience of hoer. lag what was said out of Court ; It was not know. In the Coact nor to the Counsel whet did peas, bet the very hazard of being tampered with focused a resumption which ought to operate 'gains' the ye,. die. lie s•bmitfed therefore that his Clieet was ea. titled to anew trial. M►. DENOIAX Said).e was not able to submit soy authorities in additions to those • kith had been goofed by his Learned Friends. Ila should bare Monist, indeed, that it would have bees quite 'Wiriest for him to put in his affidavits on il..gerwral principle of law. Neither his (Meat, the ..ttorovy, nor himself were soar. of thodispersioo of the Jury till after t►e verdict. In his view of this subject, be oofeigoodly declared that • more important case Never e•we be- fore s Cored of Justice; for if s Joey were allowed to disperse, verdicts might herself', b. returned by 12 Ewa, not epos dm evidence adduced no lb. 1601, bet under a housed ►atr•seous impressimis. It had been shown by Mr. Common Sesjesnt, dont the bare possibility of a Jury seeing papers had been sufficient to set aside a verdict : Mere they hod an opportunity of seeing this observallows in the Public Priors, after the proceedisty of the list day. If • Jury were al lowed to disperse before the verdict, who wits to define the length of tiwo during *shish they might be separated ? Mr. Justice HaTt.ti.--Pot it then tie other way. The Judg• sometimes loaves the Coma fair a fro minute., and • .luryaras also retires this is • se paration of the Jury, bat would t►is ovoid /he ver dict ? Mr. Dressan.—Seeb a retirement is fee irl able parionses, well understood by all parties. In the ruse of Watseis and others, for treason, lie Jery were not allowed to disperse ; they were locked ep for severs! days', and were only allowed to walk out is, the moraine ender tire rare of an officer of tl•e Court. In the present case. on the second day of trial, the Jury cant• In separately; and there was therefore the tallest epportanity of their being seism/ with persons who enieria.ned the strong est commercial feelirso ..gainst Ike Defendants. The Loup Cuirr JLITICE, havieg remferresi with his brothers, said—if we eracrisined any desist on a gondola cf t4is kiel l we 'Lost! reuse Wine we delivered our opinion tea as noon of Ili ent►rtain any deals, in this rase, I mot say at once that there is no ground far this application. It is hrseght for. ward an the fact that she Jar), disp►rsed at night, and that that fact was not known so the parties.— The trial lasted till II o'clock at nialit, sod the evi dence for the presecnti..n was tint then eased; the trial was therefore adjourned from necessity. It would have been mast imitating* to the cause of the Defendants, that their arse should he board by ,mods exhausted. An adjoernmeat, however, is not nom. sadly fullnwed by a dispersion of the Jury ; hat I think in tam of elademeanear. this the dispersion of the Jury does not ovoid the verdict. Formal eases have occurred in which this has been dace. Much has been said repeating the consent of the parties; bet I think that the consent of the Defendant makes sin difference. 1 uraceise that the titivation ought not to by pot to hie. as be may not have a free clinic"; he me, consider that his refusal may "stile • feeling against him in the Jory. As In the consent of the Jade, shut wield not make that lawful which might be Della whit before. It is oat Sal mieed in this me, that daring she sight any attempt was aside to tamper • Ith the Jary : if that had been suggested, the Court I might have been induced to enquire jot. it. The se paration without the consent of the Judge, may he ■ distinct thing : II woo tome thst the law has vetted a discretion in the Jodie of ' , Honing the Jury to disperse. For my own part I most stay. that the more I ern bound down by roles, and the less I am vested with a discretionary power, the more comfort able I shall feel myself in the discharge of my duties. I r►gret itstreeely, that the verdict in this case was received with any exclamation of the bpstanders: a verdict, whether for or against the patties accused, is the solemn decision of twelve men, sworn to prr. e ding to the evidence, and shnuld alsra)s he received with teverential silence. Upon the whole, I am clearly of opinion, that the verdict in Ibis case I I cannot he avoided. Mr.Jovlice BOYLLY.—There is nn part of this ap plication which states that the verdict was against the evidence; it seem to me, therefore, that the Defetsd. sots bad me title to took* such an application. It often happens that ■ Judge gars oat of Coact for few minutes, and the Jury seize the opportunity of retiring also. This was a separation, and )et nobody had ever thought of disturbing • verdict for suc► a tea ses. It bad been said, that this was done in the pretence of all puffin: still the thing must be ernog, no the principle that all separation was improper; sod it would be the duty of a Judge to interf►re, although no objection might be made by a Psi saner. But such an interference bad pained. If the Jury disperse without the consent of the Judge, he may (urethan; even that is discretion ; bet the circomslance does not vitiate she verdict.— It is said to be a gesmi principle, that the dispersion of a Jury vacates the verdict ; if it does in, we do no injustice by refusing this application, because if it vacates iheverdict, the Defeodants may bring a writ of error. I do not my this from feeling any doubt nee she subject, hat merely to nt•serve that loch would be the proper mode of proceeding. Mr. Justice Ilozeirro.—l am of the same opi. Mon. If it had appeared shut she Jury had be►n ' tampered with, or there was reason to doubt the propriety of the verdict, deo the Court mig►t have interfered. Mr. Justice Box, in ring with the rest of tLe Court, observed, that !ha law laid down in the case of Lord Delmore night have beep th► practice then, bet had bees departed from in many recent trials. The Learned Mg@ took occasion to express his disapprobation of the pahlication of proceedings at law is the daily Journals before she delivery of the verdict, and wished that the matter could be firelight ender the consideration of the Coed. The application was thus refused ; and Mr. Gummy then moved, that the Defendants (rlin, 119 is necessary in Notions of obis 1011/ . 1, ,were in Court) should be committed to Nene'', and he brought op for judgment on Viands: neat, which was ordered. CONSISTORY COURT. Arm. ei3. LART DRRIZWR ADAM? LORD DERIILRT. This was a seit for restitution of conjogal rights, instituted by the Hon. Octaris Spinelli, Prine•sa Dowager of Detail, in Sicily, commonly callod Lady Herbert, against Robert Henry Lord Herbert, sea of the Earl of Pembroke. Hy the libel, it appeared that the potties contracted a clandestine marriage et Palermo, on the 17th of August, 1814. and that the Lady arrived in London in the month of March, 1817. Of the 39 eitoesses /Itemised in this matter, the pester somber were so examined in order to speak to the idestity of the parties; the marriage sees proved by the priest who solemnised it according to the rites of the Roman Catholic Church of Sir Wito.taw Scow, having defined the nature Of the present proceedings, gave sentence. Ile observ ed that the parties in this cash were neither of them minors; Lord Ilerbert being upwards of 21, and therefore competent, in the eye of the law, to take the step he had decided apes ; sad the Lirly (Curia Spiaelli, although somewhat older them himself, was yet net of en age which of itself implied any lacer.- grill, in the match. It appeared that Lord Herbert, being in the year 1814 la Sicily, was introduced by Lady William Beatinclt into the family of the Prince de Botari, whose palace was the great resort of all the English Nobility who whited that country, arid who were always received with the utmost bospi• tality. Of that hospitality Lord Herbert was a con. slant partaker, being frequently with the family Were et twice a day, both at l'alerato mod in the country. Ile appeared to have redolously endea voured to gain llorfavaorablo o;•ininrr of the Prioress, shows husband dying in Juno, 1814, she shortly after, aceotding to the t►s.imony of her ►;.ter, the Duchess di Sul; Gtotanni. Plendestioely married leird Herbert. lisiiiit roniffionted en this pit, of the evidence, and ow the manlier in which the marring, was cel►brated, the Learned Judge remarked, it was not for hint in trosifitain any ronsiderstioi; as t. the propriety of the match on either side, the pith ques tion was as to the validity of the marrise•. It Was evablislied by law, that if a merrier was ,al.ll in the country where is took place, arrording to the riles and usages of that camorry, it eel a good one hero; and this was so held wpm. a S..ff jvs ;TR. tient ; for, however naked the might lee , how , MI MINN in sibilance, piLsidett cou!ortned to that standard, the cation cal law weds t .1 ti.loit as perfectly staid. Now. the .o thtf hers @needing the relehrati..ti in the pre , ....1 rise. established the certainty of tarot. in tm . complied with. and ILO nlUnioni ..f aaa.l ft enotssed to this Ir.( be'..,. clearly determined the salids.) of this I..arriaze, •:. though a clai.d.stii.e nor. Ater s..noe furs..., cis. 'ions to them-op, soil Jilts...i „ o of f or i o , o f re. girding marriages of this 11.1resplion. the Coot strongly reprobated the ides that it ,h. , eld heel to call in the aid of a foreign creeks' en .c.ine..t, sc. knowledge(' to be slounst &wow in its nia•t4ii, o , its aid of its civil josivisctioss—a weesere to • in it was iecompetent, and in • high nnp,i,.ci p p real) he for on. isoinent made oat. And at • I n4O Not at that t..e of Is f ...Arr. the pelt) casstegaplateal by the machete' ; bat at that of 1.0r.l Herbert himself. oho had avowedly infti. , ged it. r.osi t the wh o l e the @eidetic", the Cnott thnoght the Lady p r , M o d to her prayer; •nd therefore decreed 1... rd 11. f ti er t t i p receive her as his wife with corjugst idles lion, mad In certify to it, by the 6,st day M•chaelwas Term, that he bad complied ws.h it. thjanition. Lord fiedsett is at pli..rnt Ares'', Rot ►casing visited Ensland sines ihe )rat Ihl I. 'lke obit *as evanesced is 1813. OLD BAILEY. FRID %Y. APRIL It Henry Dart. aged 11. ad %I.sry %row Grillides..eed 17 . rem enrosesed gd Inosre is. fluor ........ forged orrea. parperiind is, be mere .4 sbe Gritting rad Gee. the If..ab of Lanford. r Woos/Mon. agedit. wee erpisally eau lessolar brerkirsi and mining lbe dreln of Jaw., I...givi. et lesser lan. (oltr N hue Hofer IOW) avid Iroglariosa.l •.rldint therein one IS Ml 4 Ensassori n le r.r IWI, soar Mae, nose. far 101. and Ire errerlionk•ro en for 61 e.ress. :be pr.. perty of fleeter Misolerribir• —Tbe prroerbor d ihts es • were •hhiell in she Police 'blown I)easb. The Farman. at she Jery. n How 'sae. 6411.1.0.5eil she Beach, and bolted re lesowsrlll so ree•ruwerd she •ii.ofter went The Proweioeie in fro radrer, l •ll.3 ; and she Recanting' aware/ hem dra he vss eV represent roe manierdr so his lio‘nl Ilorbsoer obe 11ege..1 Ups* the rtiatietioo of the eri.ostr;, a e woe. Prat,' -Saila? In Chat wait h aeon-rod ors a !armee day. p 1... fa the. ease. ok as the Nemec ofte, he Pi itoit., ar..• I rit.••••ed -1 pro. petty. a., local es 1.. r witiani a hn . l. us..a •I'. C.tarea. Ike Prisoner had p.rrlntied ittoirloe. tis.tt ..401/ 'Ave. shies had ant bee" r ,...d 17 sateosaseeied silk She paisieoLir clomp 1..416/san•at. properly it nronally snit d benne the unn.ipp) tae a b, remits isdit lobo • like listair, u •k. tended inmssre arta 41 n 1,1 , 1. a d tea. ga of coasproloo for she poet. Yrio.ner't y) oveirtime by a anted, 'berg 4ref tier. w- whirl we are about to reLose are moan diltr.eefat. Rea t i l a. deed .orpritliog, that is. a Coors at J•tiiitte a lertninU eirimilret s.toola be allayed. The fasdlody Srb Psi. Ler. wk. , f 0.4 poswior of fur: fa flee sitoes.lo' h .3 r iio soosrusocol to her Md. Mr. Amor. ad4 , setiog her. told. •• 1 de4te rm. Madam e to deliver that to the Yressecroor, otos iss lir s Ira, whole Is aright be else,." The landlady sari arllveriag It to the ultra Mr. Ithrtit Stearns Maisel tootettiatelt Ars re ett fwe Is r log (ape soppier or the purpose at sating a-se.tiost of . he gem 4sa). sad addrerforg Mr Aar) at she ...air state, said. ** 1 Not ghee 'oar viers,'" Iliseataosa hese Interfere& and entered that the ses,afte should be gis co et the Prasserater 4 It tit air other pi oprrry laid he ha wale & to da. and resold 141.• he . rder Jowl it. llteletterrif then et-tired so he hot. good Mr Pales, he oar der-tits r.L deutaastrd lit pro en) is the s ame of the Stserlfs The kreerd r ?creased his “rder. sad the aeswt siaqiitas to she I toreesior. _ Leadbroier. eten of the Marlinlora. had pemonhen Orbs irorliery. and asked of tee l snit e hat centre. be are no pore mob ? Mr said be ea. eireineeed with Ms amble by .be bereft . a oar side. and tear Prenecetwee tedicener no the eater, if ■t rare It, the property. The l'atibitT woeld give no ors► ahem Mr Panes Mee taserrred, slue the P.iiespres proper - y had hoieoine. the property of the nherif, sad tier Coen bed ao ► Kit is deeper 4 li. After tonotilerehie alseres.sou bele. es Um peen. Web inierrapi.d tk boeiness er she l out; tbr t• dropped. sad loodbeater vine need ill poseeeion it is yerrelle.y, soh daring to deliver it up ee either piety. MARKRTS. LUX Mt 1 1./GEs Cess-Tripeeter's Ream.— rise gAT beau.. sIL Whist, per lasi lOl. Is 111. --s. Bark), per oeaAe► Us. —d. Okss 51s. —4. to 13.. —4. —4. to —s. —4. 44.. —4. is fir. -4. --s. ow —.. --d. K. a./ • • t)id 01414. Nt• /*HILL US. LEA I Ilt.k Ilost►. id to 361 b. each - WM to 11 . 1 pot I. Itoto. at) so 4,4 b.. cads ltd so —4 14.-rchnuts* Bou.ks . —d lo Drrosing !fides Ilqd to Idd nitre Cowl Mere . lid to 104 Crop Holes _5 to 401 Ito hr cultic Ifild so 164 !two 4.5 to .50111 s. - lIM t. 204 Calf Milos 30 to Intho. to I7d Ditto NI In /Mho. - 304 to Idd Ditto 70 to *Abe - *l4 to 344 Small Seats i(:recolasil) - to 1N Large Milo stk. so 11116. per doors. NR/MATEAND LF.ADRNHALL MARKET!. On the Canra..,) Reef .... h. 01. t• ie. 0/. LVeal .... 4.. 4d. I. 6.. Id ll Mueal ... Ile. 6d. i• se. N. Peek ... 5.. bd. ie 6.. 611 Lame PRICK OF 3s. James's Market. 4s. 44. Clare Marker Os. Ud. bS hien hart Msrkelds. 44. pen ma Slb . Average 4s. N. TALLOW. 1 Tollgates, 745. id. --.. OIL Yellow itersialls. Od --.. Od. White done. Os. od —s. Od. beep dlii* . 64.. od —s. W. WO* bbt bk. W --. 04. DOW mask. ..IL. W —l. LA. Graves Quid Omni ll'. U.'. lOs. W. 1016.—Cord, 106-.—Fais. 0.. p.. i. I*. id.—Missid.. 14-. W. OF HON. - Veil*. Xiiip. IC4.—Moillrd. Price of Goodies. per Mae PRICE NSW BAG& Kest ..: 108. Suiras...lll. Pk to Gt. C. 111• W TOCIIILTS Kest ....61. 4.. Is Uses . Si. 0, We. 44.. teset ...M. Q. 1.. 71. 4*. Paribas* M. t WA. 0 . COAL-11 AR K I taw. •t Squirt. Maps Yll Netwe-4641r .. 1;1 ... U Suirertiped couitio". or Exciur U B. U U. Illus. MI 4ighl, U 0 A 11W0 . 1.14 , 1. II 6 C. F. Id .100. II 3 Flowe,ditie. II 7 U. Aeolstrep, 11 8 Fs. ow U. %Itnevi. Si I U. P• 11.1, 411)• • • ORM. Mo.. A lo U. 11...fr.lonost. Yi 10 U. l'coak MI dor Lining% lileime Undrid. 3.1 eters'', 99 erective Bilbao. VA SP•vollr, 311 38 ET. Aram M. sold. Pak,. 564 el. 4. 4:a. IV, U-. 04. On the 19tH 01. in Owen rh 11.teinson Irrren—iiii, rm. FiIIDAT. AMU. XL Limbers, .‘,ll Gems, 4 i Malta, 50 Veske, Maples, 414 Palermo, 10 per os. Lesbos 51 Orrin, 51 His Jawrire„ Cide Drblist. 14 per t Cork. 14 per Celli. Agin of 111. Doak ei• 110111 a /. Piersiiril Gold, is Lvio, nee rg , Barr, peewit. New UMIwo. 5, 61. Sdeerook Haw. wwucard 60. 4. Ediabovoh. ,hr Lady of J rdirsitor. {.lke roooty of .4 yr LONDON t Primed Nod enbli.lie4 by P. Primir. mI Mr bt 0.1 Ivaa% Vista, hui._ll, biliebary- won, itet-.Kier. 'IMP' e