The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-11-21 00:00:00

C _ • r _~._ -- - U.S.tt was contradicted by the master •' and with re- Mr. ScitaLETT to support Ms role.. The Learned t , Poen* to Mr. Jones, his a ffi davit was iiidirct contra: Counsel contended, that the whole object of Mr. diction to his own deposition before the Coroner's Gurney's address to the Ceort seemed to be rather Inquest.. It bad been stated when this motion was to vindicate the conduct of Mr. Tooke and. Mr. Yeo- Inade, that with the exception of Mr. Tooke, there man, than that of the Editor of the Times. ith • leas not a single witness eaamined before the Coro- respect to the case itself, if the Court could decide I vet who imputed the slightest blame to Lord ; this question upon affidavits, it-would appear that thei Churchill in this, unhappy affa r. Now, so fee' affidavits which this young Noblemen had to produce from that being correct, every .of the witnesses would completely vindicate him from any blamable before. he Coroner concurred . I‘l imputing blame, conduct in this melancholy. transaction, which he as' certainly on intentional misconduct, but an impatience deeply and as sincerely lamented as any of the friends aiod impetunsity, which had they been restraieed of the unfortunate young woman who had lost her "' by for a quarter of e minute,' those fatal come.: life; but he (Mr. S:) was not instructed to pot the ' quences would never have • happened 'which gave: case open that issue. 'The question was, whether'. rise to the present enquiry. It appeared that Mr. I Mr. Waiter could be jestffied in publishing the state= • 'Rieke was driving his" chaise at a very moderate pace I ments in question, which were calculated - to cast along the road, the road at the spot where the acci-'i the most offensiveand injurious imputations upon the tient happened not being more than 22 feet in width. character and conduct of Lord Churchill ? From Th. Noble Lord stated that be. hod called several the affidavits in support of the rule, it appeared that Owes to Mr. Tooke to make way for his gig, sad 'that Noble Lord had evinced the moat humane sou. Iftat tfle g room hail also called out for the same par- sideration for the fate of Miss. Shirley—that when „ • pia ":red that then Mr. Tooke had pulled his horse the accident happened, he had deeeended from his I laithsietle.-. 7 .1 movement which, it seemed, had been gig arid afforded every assistance in his power he him. I fritind great fault with, though, in fact, it was the self . and bis servant, and that he 'hid given /tie ad.' ' only proper one he could make ender the circum. dress, and expressed his readinesi to attend .the Coe • stances, he being on his own proper side of - the road. roner's Inquest, if his presence was required:" The This was corroborated by the testimony of the groom insinuatiou..contained in the second libel was corn. • himself. It appeared from the concurrent evidence pletely negatived, and the Learned Counsel, after of several wituesses, that the Noble Lord was at commenting upon the aggravated nature of the libel, this time driving his horse at a furious rate. Same l as well as upon the affidavit, upon the other side ) of them, indeed, only called it an improper rate, submitted that the rule most be made absolute. but all them imputed blame to him on the occasion. in the course of the.argumeot the COURT suggest", • It was OA ed that the horse was on a full•trot, and ed, that the Jury might have been warranted in bed. ' that at the time he was attempting to pass Mr. ing a verdict of Manslaughter upon the evidence • there was another vehicle of the same kind contained in the affidavits stow offered on the part of , *task to pets et the same moment ;, so that, in fact, the Defendaat ;. but thisseas answered, that the Jury it vAtsirri_possible for three vehicles safely to pass upon conceiving that there was no criminal misconduct on ' • the road, which, es already stated, was only 22 the part or Lord Churchill, bad found a verdict of feet in width. To say the least, therefore, of the Accidental Death. feeble conduct, under such circumstances, The Learned Counsel hating beets heard on both .. he evinced' a degree of indiscretion and impatience, sides, 'Which showed a distiegard of his own Catty, al Well The Cum? JUSTICE said, that the Court, In die ' as that of others. Indeed, Mr. Jones himself.charging this rule, would pronounce no opinion upon said before the Coroner, thtit the Noble Load'i"the merits of the conduct of Lord Churchill on the horse was on a full trot, and that be thought hie' occasion of this accident ; it certainly appeared in Lordship had doue wrong. in attemptieg to peas till• his fovea!, that the evening after, and on the fol der the circumstances stated. Another Witnesses, lesion day,. he hail conducted himself 'sith mach who passing along the read,' harispreallid his sp. Jeeling and propriety ; but he could not'seffer a case prebensinns that en accident would happen hour the like rhir to pass without making this observation, manner iu niiich hie Lordship was daring: In in: that the driver of a carriage who is following another, ewer, therefore, to_ the suggestion, that Tobitss' o onht to slAcken his pace, and give reasonable time ' s was the only person who had imputker Mem, to LA fat the caftiage before him to draw out of the road Churchill, there were three atter witnesses who, and pais. • even before the Coroner, had-v*444rd their disap- 'lt appeared by.the affidavits on the one side and probetion of the Noble Lord's conduct. The Learned on the other, that there had been experle statements . „Cooniel then proceeded to read the supposed libel, published in the Newspapers, 'attributing blar •' • (es has already been mentioned) was a statement one another. All such publicatiotta the Court' • bent of the real circumstances of the case, purport. highly improper; but adverting to all the ing to have been written by a gentleman named Yen. stances of the case, there wag no. ground' made " man, a friend of Mr. Tooke, in answer to a state. for panting a criminal information against which had previously appeared in the Morning Walter. But the door of iustipe was not c 1( llerald, Mr. Yeoman attributing the acc4letit and refusing this rule, if Lord Gitetthiii-should ' the result, to the furious driving bf the Noble Lord. vised to have recourse to tire 'preeeeding by • Th e Learned Counsel then proceeded to read the ment; hut although theCtre4theteght this Rut •T• effidz.vits (in support of his argument, that the slate. to bedischarged, they didsolAlliskileat the —"'went published in the Times was a correct account of this Papas-did.as esti *vita She transaction) of Mr. Yeoman and several other Court to discharge it lwith•totwateawMarte dischatod ' persons. The forme - stated I , 'tbat be had attended • causirt/MANVirtar • * . .... . er ' in an adjoining room to that in which the Coroner's Inquest was held, and that be had conversed with several persons, eyewitnesses of the accident, who were unanimous in declaring, that the occurrence had taken place in consequence of ire furious driving of ' Lord C. Whose cond'uct t hey said was highly blamable. — ..Tkobffidavit of a Gentleman, who was passing at tke this of the accidOot with the funeral procession of the ret urn from the churchyard, also Stated; that the mischief would- not hare happened, bettor Lord Churchill's indiscreet driving, and that • itts tnisfortine wids . Sot have occurred had he stopped his born for about half a minutes The •` Learned Counsel read these affidavits in detail, which amounted to five in number, and he also added the effieavits of two of the Coroner's Inquest, who were of opinion that the accident might have been avoided, had Lord Churchill been more careful. In answer to she observation, that the Coroner's Jury • had not found a deodand of the Noble Lord's gig, it was stated, upon the affidavits, that Mr. Stirling, the , Coroner, had directed the Jury not to find 'a deo.. Weans! Mr, Tooke might bring an action, eitiost Lord Chwechill . for the damage his gig had •reefivtd fall*to the 'ground if a dendsnd were found: IbsOer these circumstances, theleaarn ed Counsel subssitfici, that there was no pretence for this action, inastSuils as it appeared there was no misrepresentation of theyansaction, the accuracy of the statement being,:vouched and 'Confirmed by the affidavits he-had' read.* With respect to en anony . moos letterwhich bad bean written to Lord Chirckill in offensive terms of reproach of his conduct, Mr. • Waiter bad certainly nothing td do with that ; • nei thee Ind Mr. Tooke nor Mr. Yeoman any thing to do ▪ with it • the application, therefore, being completely answered, he trosted that the Court would discharge the Rule with costs. 'Mr. SCAALFFT reminded his Learned Friond,.Mr. Gurney, tbat*there bad been another libel peblifiled •• in the same Paper, a day or two afterwards, sglinst Lord Churchill, which required some esplausiwss. Mr. GURNEY said, that be bad hoped.bis Learned riend Id not have Animist it necessary to bring TILE KING tr. TWO • SAOIIOIIIIAIteS .03 TBIL ... OF *NI EILESa. - - 0- Mr. GURNEY moved•joi 4.reitaltailtisseriel e why a criminal information not .t. filed against two Magistrates itttivescoliety of Middlesex, for misconduCt, ittrkiaingt• from improper motioes, to license *a publieloole: At present. Ike Learned Gentleman conceived it would be better not to name the parties.- • 'rite CHIEF JUSTICE- 66 it is al silts better on such occasions to withhold the names." . • Mr. 6entleir mold, his appLitetion was made tit the instance "eaf a Gentleman'of.thensme of Beau mont, who walk himself in .the Commission of tl4. Peace ; and be swore thet-he believed the refusal'of the Magistrates to license a public-house built on hit estate, erosiarum private pique against him, in con- . setieence of bit haviril taken den active pert in espos , ing abuses in the licensing Apiece, which had .ten dered him obnoxious to the against who* he moved. Mr: Beaumont had, et SitePhertrs Bush, a, considerable estate, on ,Which many houses wer# l , built, and he was reqneated, for the convenient , 41 his tenants, to erect h public-house. lie did • very superior pubtic-hoose, at an eartence of t thuosanti pounds.; bet every application on the p of *:slla :tenant tolsiocire a licenie had failed. ' tel one •tioste tabs Aliso - assigned fur the Vogel I ". 'that 1, - !..• not hou,ea enough—when bows. were . - ;11*. tires mid there was not a sufficient 1 number:* - habitants, although the Magiorates)i-ci sensed ii,)i'ltie, much inferior, in the same place.--:i The retains last advanced, when a respectable man; ' regularly' certified, requested a licence, was, thathAl certificate was not signed by the Ctergytnan am!'" Churchwardens, without. which, by Act of Petlial 1 spent, they could not grant the licence. Mr. _esa.) 1 Moot showed them that sfichlignettsie was nut ne-i cessary, but stilltikty,ief.used,." for erste reasons.— 1 They however , .grlfte h ed ie reett;oo4 to - persons w hose certifica tat were signed*. titti Clergyman and Churchwardens—andv in fact, the Clergyman of Hammersmith, in which district the born lay, never shit If 7 Fret woo. no.. JogL__ the second soplposed libel under contideration. •: • appeared that that alleged libel was written by Me. Yeoman, in answer to as. advertisement which -bad appeared in the Übserver of the preceding Sunday, and it seemed that the sting complained of was the supposed iiditfereoce of Lord Churchill to the me lancholy fate of the young Lady who had lost her Me, in taster having made any enquiry about her at Mr. Tookees house, brit, on the contrary (accord. lag to a statement which had appeared in the Morn. iiitlttiarti the preceding day), he bid manifested liis intiillireaceby attending °tie of Alsnaclea Greed Balls, ,the vitity iamevvening the accident happened. Now with iasgect to the latter circumstance it had • : , been stated mere ly ob the authority of soothe: l - Pa per, and hid not been vouched on the authority of • . the talker of the second 'apposed libel. There was nothing s therefore, of an aggravated nature in that second peWication. *Mr. ftosissas wit,proceecling to address the Court en the same side with Mr. Gurney, but their Lordships thout it unnecessary to bear Wm, and tkerautt ca l le d upfro was in the habit of signing. - The CHIEF JUSTICE said, 'lf Mr. Gurney had given the usual notice to the Magistrates, he atighti take his rule. This not beleg the case, Mr. GURNEY was obliged to withdraw his motion for the present. • .1 The following are the affidavits on which Mil GURNEY grounrled his application The affidavit of George Rands stated, t h at •he had made seve ral anneal applications for a licence to open the bon..e tenanted by him at Shepherd's Rush, bat had always been rehored. That having had the signatures nt the Churchwardens and Jiver seers, besides all the principal Inhabitants. to the certificate of his character on former appiteat tie had only lakerrsigna tures of the inhabitants ott the last occasion. Rat the Justices refused the licence, alleging, that the Act of flieliaesetit re einired the signature of the Minister and Cherchnardens to tbe. certificate of his character, whklt he denied, and stated that theyi had not required such signatates to offier.cooes. • ' he affidavit of J. T. Kerber Beaumont Esq. dee Magistrate,' stated, that the Justices had declared to him, that.they refused the licence because the certificate to character had nut the Mi nister and Churchwardens' signatures, as. required by Aet of Parliament; which be denied being so required by the AM, or Ito have been required by the said Jostices b Other cases. that he was ground leattlord-of 70 houses la the village; that enteral ' t years ago he war urged to build this bowie" his tempo, for 1 their necessary necomattrOtion. tberM.. being , drat one pshlie house iu the village, anted tbat one at. a great distance off : that . ' _ Stia TriE " .‘• gko • he built the house three years before be was in the Commission of the Price, at an expeace of nearly 2.0001. ; that seven an. fatal applications had been made for leave to open the house, ' by respectgble tenants, who had all been refuse d, on various g rounds—arst, that there were' not new houses enough— then. when these increased,that they were hot all inhabited, and when inhabitants were procured, and a licence agreed to be issued, it was denied on Deponent's house, and granted for a mean thatch ed building. standing alone at an inconvenient distance ; and 1 that 3301. was paid to the Vesfry Clerk fur procuring inch li eence. That upon the licence being granted for the thatched house, the land about it, which had been tottered to he let as building ground for several years to no purpose, beiame forth— with taken and covered with houses ; mod that Deponent's land, which hail been previonsly freely taken, being th en desists! the , convenience of a public,house. from that time. ceased to be ap plied for as building,ground.. Tnat iu the same hour when the Justices at Hammersmith last refused the licence to his house. they granted new licenses in favour of Mr. Thompson (a brewer is the neighbourhood) and others, for two low tippling houses, which had been suppressed by former Justices as disorderly or unnecessary. both of which houses were adjoining ol directly opposite to existing licensed houses, and in the immediate vici nity of several others ; and that id neither of the above cases was a certificate from the Minister produced or enquired for. — He lastly declared his firm belief that the continued refusal of a liceice for his house, so inconsistent with the facility with which the said Jostices grant licences fur low tippling houses - in places crowded with such houses, to serve their friends, at use from a desire to injure him is the fair enjoyment of• his estate, ' in consequence of the ;tart he bad taken during several years iq opposing and exposing the errors of their conduct. and of the present licensing system generally. The affidavit of William Cotter stated, that he had built seven good houses in Beaumont-place, Shepherd's Bush ; that in consequence of the want of a respectable public-house con tiguous, he and other tenants of Mr. geanniont penuadeit hint} to build the public-house which he had done. There was no public-house within three quarters of a mile of it, on the hue of Wood-lane, or within a considerable distance em the road to London, and none near the village which offered a decent bulging; that there had been upwards of one hundred new houses built within the last seven years. and iu the whole there wese six times us 'natty houses now in the village, as there were thirty or forty years back; but that the amber of public-bouses (two) remained the same. COURT OF COMMON - PLEAS. Nov. 20. DUU -01 NEWCASTLE AND WriffitS D. CLARLIC ASO OTIIE1; The Plaintiffs are the Commissioners of &ewerSiCs Susses; the Defendants are the CoMmissioners of ti.) e • Hoboes. The Plaintiffs built a wan Yor draining and shutting out the tide from covering and *rendering. useless many adjoining acres of land. 'Chia wall the Defendants destroyed as pbstructing the navigation of the harbour. The Plaintiffs brought their action of trespass in 1817, at Lewes, before the present Chief Justice end a Special Jury. A preliminary : objection etas thes i s : stated, that the Plaintiffs. having no property in thwwall, tong not niainialn an action of trespass. This point was-saved, and the case went to thi Jury, po the evidence of the facts. The Jury ,found a verdici w ankconsiderable damsges for thii r Plaintiffs. A ruts 1%0 boen long since obtained to Vionr . caute why the verdict should not be set ati e; I,bet the cause Om not beard till no*. It was agreed heard to-day. They•argued* that the Plairitilis had a . right of action, as having built the wall in question; and having authority from an Act el Parliament to keep in repair. There was no other remedy ; an in. Aictment would only punish thy offender, but would not compersate the Wm. It was not necessary in en action of trespabs, as in 'rover, to prove the right of property .. it was only necessary in trespass that there strouldbe.possession. In a case in the King's Bench, the Commissioners of enclosure sustained an action of trtepass for a stake planted by their surveyor, and Tarried away. That they could not maintain the sc . tine, as to lend, saes irrelevant to the present ques tion, as they had not such rights and powers as the I Commissioners of Sewers. if the Plainti ff s had not I a right of scion, none had. The property was en. I protected, and this could not he said of any property lin this country. But the 37th of the King, chap. I I 3U, section IS , entitled them" In cot new sluices or dams nearer the sea, if they thought h necessary for sewing nut their waters" They had then at least ir much right of action as the master (AO ship, 'whose tight could not be qoestioned. They had exclusive I >ossessiorr, so far as that stone had a right to go upon 'their works. But It was not necessary that it should be exclusive ; each of two tenauts in common could bring an action ; a tenant by setrerance, or his land. lord, might bring an &cline. As to the second point „oh was a navigable river, they had • right by the Act to stop'it. Besides, they were here contending with wrong.doers, not with owners of the and. They ,were, therefore, clearly entitled to maintain their' 4.liiidri, - otherwise the.eteke casein the Kitts's Bench i i was vs 'Ong. • i Cent JrrsTlce.--Air r lthout giving any opinion, IL I pgtjrne question to My bugbear Copley, which he I witl'ettameireeri fed Co inawer when he is• heard on , the sithjeet. “ . 1 1 there any instance of Commis. -sioeers carryini on it pvMic work who maintained en action of trespeSeht case of Injury, end proved their possession as the foundation of their action ?" 1 The further bearing was pat' off till Monday. POLICE. ...,_ STOLEN CHILD, ita. • —w-erstrer..-/k letter was received on Friday al the °ace tem Goodwin, the ens table, who is employed to pursue Charles Remelt and the child of Mr:Horsley, of Coliohhitry-lane, Is Unglue, accompanied.by.Mr. Horsley * nephew 4n, itentify the ;child. 'the letter Is dated from Calais, and stated Witt they had ',twined them to that place, and arrived there on Sunday, and -they had no desist-bat that they bail traced '(roise.' and the child to have at:rt./riot Calais on the A eclnesday after 'leaflet' Stole the chiid.'onfl that he had taken his place is a diligence, and is supposed to he gone to I)tonkirk. ' . M A RLBOROPGII-11T111115T. Ellen Taylor, charged a youth, named K'oarlie, with knocking her down in St. Martin's-court, on Thursday night; wheo ehe 106 t a handkerchief. The Prosecissaie stated, that in pawing through 'St. Martin's court with another female. she was- awoled by the Pri.oner and two others, strangers to them. The Prisoner knocked her down isr Or a bludgeon, and snatched at her whictle. In doing which ise tort ber dress. She bled profusely from• *lc heed, het she gave an alrirm, and the Prisoner was secuyed,lty Mr. Neville. 'There yes na . provocation given for this wanton act. Webb, the coastabletif the night, said. llilhal termie- Idearissitai is **pitiable state when she wake*, AlduSe• '' Thethargfwas for dm assault,. and the MantrehKVisb= wryer, that the Prisoner was fortunate that a =pita& ellatigescas iluC ilis4 4 (teesl— lir wits oi deted to bud verykood hail. COA 1e.14 AK' Ships at Market. Ships MI 4 ..... .. 21 ... - • __LI . • • . - • , _. -• • . . . - - - .... 4 ILL-TREATMENT OF 4 CHILD.• ..... - - . Friday afternoon an Inquest was held at the Moaromot Ilea& Castle street, Leicester-square, on the body of Marth a Puerello, a child about four years and ten ampolis o ld; s o w est her death under tie following circuutstatuees:— J ane . the wire of James Street, Nu. S. Whitcombe-street, Commodore of the India-manse, being sworn, slated. Oho ilia deceased was put to wino to the wife of Joseph Hill, a tailor, residing in ileintaittetorow, St. !simian's, for which site was to receive 4s. per week ; but the child being taken ill. wait can. veyed home by its tattier on Tuesday week, and died on &today last. Witaeo attended the child front .the lteh too. to let 15th ; she was regularly an tended by a medital Geutlentaa,aod believe* she died in consequence of ill-treutnivite 'Fe e d ay befote the died, she said, " Oh! duo% hurt me—will you not hurt me ?" Witness did not see her ilt.orealedt. The day she was laid not, there were three or four black marks upon bee back, which appeared to have been done byliegers. Who, she came home, sbe`said she was afraid to tell any thing for fe ar her anal woul d beat her, if she should be sent home agate, and begged not to be sent bark again. Mr. S. J. Morgan, 18, Great Ne*portotrect, Surgeons sworn, said, he was requested to atteod the deceased at her fa ther's house, No. 17, Castle-street. He saw her late in Metered tag. aid found her labouring underan intlauttoattity fes erp s,;* a great number of blotches on the skin. produced by the Oh*, ' it. 1 she weal also attended by Mr. Dr Morgan, his Oariner - g • there was no likelihood of her recovery. but yet tboreSferif . dome hopes of her total a i thin at few days of her doott v i o e ed . • Itelloest was calle.i ter at three o'clock. and None I ii p i ea d ..symptoms had recanted attended with delirious • , , 1 .. was done which was deemed proper, hat the 'rain ' tts4 7 l / e l frond ,ed in some low ty phis, which caused Iser death. . a 1 CORON ER—" Chit )00 judge What was most likely to priduest that.fevt r ?"—A. " Nothing is more likely sham theAlloreate Intent ; but a• a medical mall, I cannot state. that alleohltety, as many causes would produce it. The typhus feta kfillaweltirlfif y irreyaleut, it might come on naturally." . s' 0 1 e. 4 - Juryman —" In the course of your attendance, hirdibeehlii re • toted any thing respecting bet ill trenunent to 3 . .t0 r'-x. " She was only four year, old, and the lust.tuur dayardsemastptite isle sensible. Witness's partner corroborated his ev ideates!, he bare 'Jug shortly after attended. . Ann Sophia Blunt, wi e of William Blunt. hardware/natl. 12, liranuing's-row, stated, that Mrs 11 ili, aho had the child to . nurse, lodged in her second door. When site first had the child she was Li pere et health, sled continued so until about lo weekeugo. . Wituent met her in Mrin•litil's arms. She asked the . bild how she was? She replied," Not very we I, Ma'am." Mrs. !Witold, she mast nave got a cold or worms. as she is cono:antky relavedio her bowels. 11 §:nese asked Mrs. Hill, whether siteJlhilgiveliher any physic? She replied, that she had given lier'rhubarb. Mite ness then recommeoded her to take medical advice, mastic was ipeor mostly all the medical two in the neighbeetnosid gave ad. vice gratis. Witness then weal out of towa 4 and reined r ut oilt three or four weeks ago, and asked *et *revisal boo the lodgers were? She untied, " Very well," end dint Alias. i slotted many exilel rims exerci,ed loom the child. .'. bout the 3d inst. Mrs. Hid brought the child down tusked, hearing her mutter sometbisig, and In a few mirtuteS after-bawd her go . to the water-closet and empty a slop pail, which she • filled atilt water. When she laid dune theists.. threw the water tin the iltild, as she supposed, from the moire the child had made s isiaol tto child catch her breath Pettily, on which Mrs. !Sol said, " do'nt cry." Witness instantly . rail Into the passage wheels the water-butt was, and then saw the child quite naked, and Mrs. itlili is list act of drawiii4 a secuud pa il. W ttoess esclaiiited. " Mrs. We, you will murder the child. '` Mei. dill a nsw e r e d:'. Maslen, a im your own family:" Wittier!" said, •• lot Ottawa - do it in hob e " Mrs. hill again replied, '. Mimi yeae.own tonally, and dinging another pail of water over the child . . said, •• ilwrc 1 will do it IN INIIVIIAIIt a yin, and again if 1 like." O hate, called tier husband to prevent is, but she Will sou late, and bit told her he would erquaiiii her husband when he came home. -•• are in trie family iil ta .. ' ..„..... 0 !won.* _p tile , .0e dem-ased . yiston t‘ir . ,1.,g1im.... crying on Inc ........._ .g before , when sh 'was labrlntia the water-tub. M.*. Hill 1461411 e deceased that ithelet . a4 ~. al . ' full of rats. Site remained in the coal sense sheet so hour.-. r.. Hill the.i let the deceased out of the eeliar,. and then /p l ot her, and took her up stairs, Tat defeated did rot er; dr dr .i. any thing else to deserve a beating. Ou the same Marron he deceased said that tits. L . fiji.hasl gives. her rio breakfast • Mrs. Hill used fre. i llealilv to disci' the deceased In water. nearly every other uoriiiiic; and sirai lIIIIT Niltriliiii she 111411 btu. I.qt up maay children. and always duetted them in water. The deceased was s ery 011 in her how els at the time she. war. dloped.,ln the water. It was since her mistress came honk. that Mrs. fhill hag acted . with such creek). to ;he deceased. Oa our time, whets the de tained soiled die bed, hirs. Hill biought • the deceased down attars and threw a pan of water stet ker. The temaing t e of this witness's evjdence was its corroboration of the testimony given by Mrs. Blunt. Hannah-M. Wood, a lodger in the same house with Mrs !lilt, .coutirmed the foregoing evidence in most of the panieniars.— Mrs: it ill is 23 years old, but Geyer had any enildten of her own. Joryerian.—Did you see Sir,. Hill send Use decrasedirosit the yard, after she bad taken her out of the water-lab, is senate of nakedness, and drive her in that state, quite aaked o mp stairs, drippiog with wet ? 11 , iciness.—Tea, I did ; I saw the wave on the 'be was driven up three pair of stairs; I saw she wet The deceased was_in the water about tea misdate.. ...- L:L ,. Mr. W. Wood, the husband of last Witness, suiiird . ; ibis be had known the deceased frequently to be kept front Blonds one day to the fullowius soaraiug winnow food, suit Mackiaws"; her to be beat iu the most cruel manner for a supseter idea hear ; ' her eties were so load as to be hoard id the stree.ts. • .." ' t The grandfather of thedeceased, .ti Guldens - as of •mairlittreer. able appearance, requested to be eaumgeelt. Ake . -am t ikw :Jury thought it unnecessary. He was. however, r ass !say, that a surgeon had given Ms opinion, Shoe AM libet 1°17t.1610; caused by ate of cruelty. . ....5•*K.... 1-- .. 9. • •-; ---, o r i o N ett raid, wit it was fur the lir) lofty . .. the death of the deceased sat caused by the deliberate creels" l' of Mrs. 11111. , 'Ehat she had acted with the most. ialmissith se. verity was eidesit $ indeed, he could not bad eityaamlie foe ' - •a. butt gross ill.ircatioleut ;it was fur them Hite Jhry) to sayer*. . 1 [her she was guilty of taunter, manslaughter, or whetbosis --. ~ was justified in her coaduct towards the deemed,. .rairillai.:-... part, he tamer heard such a relatiou of aboatinaolesseirof mi.. 1 1 feeling cruelty ; bat it seas fur be to say..the eatempf her " guilt. a e„ aillie Jury, after a long enasaltation, retuned appOltiot"!' . . 1111auslauglater aizaiost Charlotte Hil . t . The CORONER said, that the panne, if ditrtlinfiglit proper, ./ might indict the Prisoiter for muster. lieletweillits reenlist lo• fur her committal, and bier was euneeyed.lty - Herlte,,Y,...litratli• ' \ stable, to Tothill.tields prison. -.. .. , . . . n ...1i-ft, • ... --7-7 01 ED. Da the 18th inst. Mr. Fr *acts W. Giles, . maker, aged 24. . . Ou the ibtli inst. Betsey, the wife of 'Mr, Fatah, Red Lino. street. Holborn. • Os the 19th lust. Alexauder Mow', SoiPtaf):Plieli.Plate* Regent's Park. . On the 19th inst. at ilammersofth, in hii 996 vkillir. , ViOn Barr, EN. late Purveyor to kit illejney's lissploalisiverada. 1 - COURSE - Or i* Excumfilk - c. R i -7--- Vi4. . - ''?i4. ----- Amslerdata,,, 0.0 8.0 U. Lqiiirs. VII • • i •• . • • Ditto, at sight, 0 0 (law, 414 .* . ,` ' - • Amsterdam, 11 i C. F. Malta, 5U 1 Ditto, at sight, 11 4 Venice, 25 50 ' ,Rutterthun, 11 8 U. Naples, 431 Antwerp, 11 11 et, roO.. Palermo. 140 per on. Harolitireh. 338 U. 1 L.a..... RC t Alton, 33 9 U. Paris, 3 days's bight, ti 66U. Ditto, 24 15 U. Hmirdeaux. 24 20 U. ' i Frank .on theMitine. I.3oeLeagg Madrid, 4U effective ~,„, •i b : Cadiz, 40 e ff ective — • ' Billion. 394 t.; , :,.. •,-..„. Seville, 394 • ~ , ..... Gibraltar. 34 • Vs. Janeiro, . lain. 91 per Cent. Cis*. per tem. Agin of ibe Bank on fralsllLe. - Postural Gold, is Colo, 41.15. • per rm. 00111, la Bars, '4l. 91. New Dollars. bs. sd. Bars,otautlgras..Cl. KET, Nov. • • void. Psit e. Sas. Od an 4&. ..,...3: 114 . lei . 44.. td. • . • I 14 1)07V I.,Pftnte.' ria4l.Publisbrd by D. Envied, at All, SIATE:3I,B2 sarvicE, No. 4, Salsbury cotort, . • • • 's the piain;.: ...a. youWC. lit Vb if Unl WI 4114,110 . 'lr. It 11,11/11111J worn lIC MIME mow, blame to th at the points to be:iirrled were , fir's, that Child to be used PO. She awn-vied, '• 1 deity% care!" Site at clrcum• seiOnil '. ;;' - cud! Rai . obstruction of a natio . , Other . lanes sand !hr did it to ch:,.a the child. Upon somb e r t thought . tiffs Budgie eat to shaitalliiis the action 4:1? rrespasf ; arca tor site (hart. lii 1) let the coca run met h er, and irfi her . itta damp iliac., naked, by way of putosnutetd, nod beat Set tiery 'severely with a rod, of whirl' stir • betresaiii etrairdays nade aut gabliiiiki t i 6 `..t 'ligimktA *!,rid, tbiidly, the non ob= l dint Mr. :tante rt:— : 1 ; ~ jectiniki.shnuld be folk) . wed up for afteraarcls.. tau the day Mrs. Jfill had. Mut t 410 toe lain of water over the child. she. drove her ap sl a m /biked: SW the slued by the DefendUtzitit%:;!:r isit PliOsstiffs offered to agree to 1 it 8 all aver with a detour( nod cold Wllifet, the 'then 4be ad- new 1611 3 ertai ibe first objections were witted. d. ,r. and beat bar einleutly • Snow days presio.4,.i.4 hid y indict- 'DP Defendants lied that the trial Should be in a .."'P ed .._ ihP ckil4l arrumeugr up MAIM , and alPu iPerl. loci' If loPeUaly . . f. ' ele.ofight di ff erent county. . tkic,,,aa'refused, sad. cause was Ana Coles, servant to Alis, illaut,depihed, thai ea one Mated gdieor of therefoee shono v :. 1 .-; . tag When - her inistrers was. ia •the country, airs: Hiff hr o .k t th f t • • ,,,,.- _ .4.404.6,..« wain , rarreFbrr h 4 _-_, cvt4 i r i t toy „ii Ii if? - eats, So rjetistrfilln, VAUGURN.,-.:41110 LOPLEY of the wuter-butt opett the decease., all . ' tan" : Ch: s yr. ix/ 4n1.11 4. for t .pet il i p t,iii i4... .pasum_sai i igliiii4kek , :t ere ijag tg.c.cao.d. reia Aged il.ltre oAtaohliolAiiiii..sk.l.„..4. • ~.,.. - ENS, tiLOSEET, ail a TiDDIC for the Defendants. C tOISITY - Messrs. S.rj ea nts BEST and VAVGIIAN Only were i ift:liatei had not takes) physic at MN title W Wee &Kited her for toe paryowoof uouicueaikriKki ! .e 4 , ~,,,, ng mortaing, Mr-, Hill put th e der,,eased . pstua tWA.ina..., cellur, tar cry nig . ? it th n 0t . 0en . 1i . 1,7 betlire, a itteibe: 'NO. 1151:14w •.; I Is - 1 , • • 1 • • • % ~1 F- I : M I I 4.