The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-08-25 00:00:00

‘) dollars a-month, that woeid prod:ice 220 dollars. The &easut., too, hosing beer iterile, I had much more than usual to pay for prosisiotis. There were besides the wr.r and tear of the ship. with the expence of sails and rigging, which sails and rigging it was nercessary to have in the best state, so as to keep the vessel tight, as we had a royal passenger on b oa rd. Th e vesse l itself vest ItiAno dollars, and it ronid not be insured at less than one per cent. Taking. then, all those expetwes to gether. he apprehended it ;toad be found that hardly any thing would remain out of the 750 dollars pe nsonth. By the Marquis of Lansoowyt —ln consequence of the disappointment which the witness said he had ex perienced as to his expence or expected remuneration cn bis voyage, did he ever make any application to the Princess, or ant agent acting for her:—No. Ile dfd not wake any such application. After he was dismissed by the Princess, he received a certificate of his good conduct from her Royal Highness, and he did not _get the compenswion which he expected on account of Ber lianti, who was angry with him, because he would not carry them to Vetter. At his departure from ('andia, cdrinandeit, and the Princess commanded what .-r Bergaml commanded, that he should proceed to But after .they to err some time at sea, the wind blew strongly from the north. He had 44 persons aro 9 horses on board, aid his stock of water was nearly at an end. These circumstances he stated to then'. They would not go to the Norm nor would they return to C.:ndia : therefore it was determined to sail fur Si 113v. Of Sicily, however, they lost sight, and therefore they proceeded to Naples. But on their arrival at Naples, Bergami, who had promised witness a present of 6.000 doLars, told him that he should have no present what ever, because hr did not sail to Venice as he had Mtn* manded. In consequence of this disappointment. nit res.; conceiving that he had been in the F.oglish service, as Le had the honour to hoist the English flag while he kid the Princess on board, appiied to the English flo wer/It:tent for remuneration. This application was made aroti o ,ll a memorial presented by his Ambassador, Cour; Gardolphi, and through this tueinorial lie believed the Ensiisb tiovernment became acquainted with the tact that he was the lientleman who had taken them to sea. Did he recollect that while the Princess and Dergami were on deck, upon any occasion, he, on any pretence, di =red any part of his crew to withdraw from that part vt the deck where the Princess and Bergatni happened to i , r?—He did not remember : he did not exactly know. If the witness desired any part of his crew to withdrier Cruz say part of the deck upon one pretend or another, :t possible that he should not remember it ?—No. I cmierstand it now. Once J remember to hare seen tt:e Ptincrits and Remand in a particular situation J desired try ma:o., Gaetano, to withdraw. because he was a yornig :nu), and because l did not think that situation was decent or proper for him to see. At the Voir hr ordered lisetano to withdraw was there cry other person near that p art of the dick where the Prireess and Bereami were —Yes, hat he divided those who were walking about there, sending some one way sad some another. Vas it to be understood that he ordered all to with draw ?—Yes. Who remained then on deck 7.—None but the Princess and fiergand. Did hy recollect any one in particular excep►ing the mate, whom he so desired to withdraw?—He desired all ent,ept Schiarani, who always. he thought, remained on deck it order to receive the Princess's entnniands. Sthiarani then did not withdraw?—No, ho did not. By a Lord whose name we could not learn.—When the tell: upon deck was shot, did Victorine remain within it?—We cortri rot precis 1y collect this unmet, hot we I understood him to reply in the affirmative, aeeuriling to Cis belief. After the tent was dosed. n• 34 the hatchway npon the pas•age leads, • to the dining room dosed also, an as to preret.t -.tsy person from going up or down through that pass•ige, het the Princess and Beigatiii i—He could rot ><x) whether this hatchway was left open; but this ke coilli say, tlist when the tent was opened in the Inernirg. he always saw that the hatchway was closed. By L.rsi Orrono— Whether in consegnenee of the retuned which witness had presented to the hnglish Goveremert,app:ving for a present, he had received any present? —No. he ha d received nothing; his Ambassador who presented that memorial and Colonel Browne also, to whom he mentioned the memorial, had toll him to come to Lcudor, and see whether he could get any thing. Br the Earl of DoNot•citstoer.—The witness had stated,- that when the Princess and Bergami were on board, he had desired his mate to retire. Did he recol lect one occasion when he gave the mate that order, that the Princess anti Bergarni were sitting together upon a gne ? Mr. Bnoecti•st expressed his objection to this, which hs conceived a lending question. Lord ilostoccnoone said, that if the question were deemed improper, he would not press it. Mr. Beoconam suggested to the Noble Lord the pro priety of dividing the question. Examination resumed. In what situation were the Princess and Bergami at the time the witness ordered his mate to retire from the deck ?—liergaini was sitting upon a gun, and the Prin cess was sitting upon his knees. Was that the occasion upon which the witness sent away his mate ?—Also upon that occasion. But when ever he saw his mate or others of his crew stand looking at inch things, be always sent them away—some one wa and some another. • (Pere there was a cry of "withdraw, withdraw."] y Lord LAUDERDALX. The witness said that he had retell-ea a certificate of good conduct from the Primes'. He wished to know whether the witness could produce that certificate? By the LORD Cuamest.ton—Where did yon twelve that certificate?—At Villa d'Este, where I went for it from Genoa. Whether did yon receive it from the Princess herself, or from any other person?-1 received it from the Prin cess herself, who wrote and signed it in my presence. It was proposed to translate this certificate ; hut it was read in the Italian, in which it was written. It was dated Pills d'Estr, Oct. 1616, and it stated in substance, that the witness was a skilful industrious man. A copy of' it was ordered to he inserted in the evidence. By Lord LAUDISPALIL—The witness bad stated that Ice was ordered to let down the curtains of the tent. Did be receive any such order when the Princess and Ber gson were u he said sitting upon the gun ? The Interpreter bare suggested to the Lords the ex pliency of dividing any question that was long, in order that a witness' , intellect esieht not be embarrassed. Whether an order to let down the canvas of the tent was given to witness at the time the Princess and Ber genii were sitting on the gun in the manner which he bad described ?-1 es, but this circumstance happened on more than one occasion. Mr Baocastast begged to make one remark (Order ! • •t!) Sou etintinue on deck after the curtains of the teat ware let down T—lio, he did sot remain there. For somethoes he west to the bowsprit, sometimes to the cabin, and sometimes to the Rua room. Question by Mr. WILLIANII.--Wailliteral 111 the MIA si gang every night to the diniaresom I—No ihe was mot in dto habit or ft *Mag. THE the witt.ess was then et tiered to withdraw. _ Mr. BROLOA NI rikprtvied a wish that the nest witness, Theodore Majoeci, turgid be re-tilled. as he had three or four questions to put to him. lie had nu objection to kate that the first questimt he should ask was, whe ther the witness was t Bristol at any time during the last v..ar --The Earl of LIVERPOOL thought that the best method I for tote House to adopt in cases of this nature, was to be goretoed by the opinion of the Noble Lord on the Wool sack. reserviug always to themselves the right of deter mining otherwise whets that opinion did not agree with their own. 'Fite Loan l'il INCFI.I.OII observed, with respect to the application before their Lordships, that the House would of course he governed by its own sense of justice. upon hearing the groptul on which the se-examination was demanded. It would also be .1 question for their Lord ships; whether they woubl ailow that further examination to 'Le taken piece-meal. The Learned Counsel (Ir. Brongbatn) would agree with him that it was at least a very unusual mode of proceeding. Sir. BROCOIIAM admitted that it was out of the ordinary course, but he would pledge himself nut to ask for the recal of same witness again, except be should and it necessary to du so on the opening of the defence. ; lf their Lordships wished, he had no objertion to state 1 the object for which he made the request at present. The Loan Co sacrum's thought that upon such a condition their Lordships might agree to the request. i Theodore Alajocci was then called in, and on ial.ing his place at the Bar addressed a few words to their borit. ' ships, which the Interpreter explained as follows :—The witness bets to ash a favour of your Lordships. It le this, that if you see any thing false in Isis examination he will lay down his heat—(Laughter.) 1 Mr. • 111tOl'611.1O1 thee, suggested the following ques tion.. widest were put by the Lord Chancellor t— i ' W:is lie at Bristol last year. or in the course of the ' present volt ?—lie does not know Bristol. Was lie at tiionces!er . ..—He knows Illotieester very well. Was he in the service of a gentleman of the name 4'l Hyatt in Gloucester ?—Yes. Did he ever declare to any person that the Princess of Wales was a most excellent woman ?—Yes; his worsts were " a good woman." Did he declare Abe. the conduct of the Princess of Wales o as highly becoming ?—lie always said she was a good woman, .but that she was surrounded by trritaillo. Did hr say that she was a prudent person, and that he had never Awned any thing improper in her conduct ? --Be does not remember at all whether he had said so. Did he ever say that the Princess had always behaved herself with propriety ?—That he has never said. Does he remember a gentleman of the nitric of William Hughes at Gloucester or at Bristol ?—.V.5 rni riror4g,. Does be know any !servos of the name of William (Inviter ?—He may, tint he doe: not know his name. Does he know any person who is a clerk at the !lank of Messrs. Turner at ttiouces:er ?—He does not know the name of any Banker. Had he any conversation with any Baniter's Clerk at Gloucester ?—.Von rieortA. Did he ever complain to any person at Gloucester that Bergami hail kept any of the servants' wages fa mu them ? —Yes. To whom did he make that complaint of liergami ? He tines not remember precisely, but he sloes remember that Mr. Hyatt asked him why he left the service of the Princess, and that he had answered him so. lie return,— bets having aided, that after his warn front a lung voy age Bergatiti wanted to lower his wages. Did he ever say the same thing to any body but Hyatt ?--Nen mai rieerelo. Does he renumber Mrs. Adams, the mother of Mrs. Hyatt Does he remember Mrs. lloglies, the housekeeper of Mrs. Adams ?—lle remembers there nag a woman who did that businesa in the house, but does not know if that was her name. Had the housekeeper a son oho was a clerk in the Bank ?—lie rettiettlhPrs that he wise in the Bank. Did be ever tell the son of the housiskeeper the eh eumatauce respecting Berge:26's conduct with regard to the wages ?—lle does not remember precisely whether he complained to him or not. Did he ever tell that young Imo, that the Princess of Wales was an excellent prurient woman, and that be never hail seen any thing improper hiller conduct?— Non sosi rirordo. The SOLICITOR-fir vr.a‘t. observed, that Mr. Brougham had exceeded the four questions which he proposed to ask the witness. Mr. Bnocustast admitted directly that he had, hut ap pealed to their Lordships whether they would stop him for such a reason ? Pies o( "go on—go on "] Did he ever represent to loin that the Princess of Wales, as far as he had seen, bad always behaved in the most proper manner ?—.Yon icordu. Did he ever travel in the stag e coach from Gloucester to Bristol, or to any other place ?—lie remembers haring travelled from Gloucester to London. Did he ever make any other journey than from Glou cester to London ?—Non rwi rirordo. Did he represent her Royal Highness to any parson in a stage coach as having behaved herself very pru dently ?—Non mi rieorrio. Dia he represent her to any person in a stage coach as a much injured woman?—That hr sloes nut remem ber any more than the rest. Dill he represent to a reason in a stage coach or else where, that he was applied to to swear against h er Royal Highness ?—What he reutertilwrs of these things is, that be never spoke these things at any place. The question being repeated, the witness seemed Rot to understand it. Several attempts were made to put the question in a shape intelligible to his comprehen sion. At length the following produced a distinct as -wirer: Did he ever say to any person in England, that he, was applied to to give an account respecting the Prin cess of Wales upon oath ?—No. Mr. BROCOliaat said, that lie did not mean to ask whether he was so applied to, bin whether he hail said to any person that such an application was made to him? The Sottcyroa-Gestenas here interfered, and ob served, that he had always understood it to be a rule in every Court of Law (and by those rules the masts nation of witnesses in this case was regulated), that when a question was put, with the view of gaining an answer, in order to contradict it, the name of the per son alluded to should be mentioned. Mr. BROVOII.OI said with great submission to the House. that the rule laid down by the Attorney-Oe neral should be attended to as far as circumstances would admit. yet in some cases it was necessary to dia. pane with it. Mr. SOLICITO.I.OII4IIRA At. apprehended that the Learned Gentleman was unacquainted with the rules of practice in this respect. Mr. BIROUGRAM exposed a wish that his Leaned !Mond, la addielon to his kaawle,ip of the rules of Court, had also karat am to into.. opt his adversary until lie had heard the whole of his artaineat. 110 had lataaded, if allowed w proceed, t• han aseatloi , ad tits mote aad plea. I The Lima CALOMILLOt said, he ad au ham Use k k. not t he rules of the Court of King's Bendel but he ci help thinking that an honest witness night sic did not remember a conversations yet on being re• , minded of the name of the person with whom it was held, might recover his memory. He could net say what the practice was at Nisi Prier, but he thought it would he better to niettion the name. Mr. 11.RocuitAX said, he had no objection to mention the name; but he wished to protest against the parti cularity to which the Solicitor-Geneial was anxious to nmrowAhe rule. ThmrsamarniSitien %cis resunied. Did-Ilwitwifhess ever say to Mr. Johnson in the stage thilk strns t npplierl to to be a witness against the Princess or Waltar.—He swears that he does not know thatimme. i• 1. Did beeves sty o to tiny person at any place, that he had been applied to to be a witness against the Princess of Wales, or words to that effect ?-I\ever. Did you ever say in a stage-coach to Mr. Johnson, that urge offers bad been made to you fur giving evi dence, bison oath, against the Princess of IVales ? The SoLiCITOR-011NERAL—Will your Lordships allow use to observe (order, order!) — The Interpreter had considerable difficulty in making the witness comprehend this question. At length the witness replied, with vehement gesticulation, " I will lay down my life (Jo meitru he urea testa) if I ever held inch discourse to any body concerning an oath. Did you ever hold any discourse with any person about ying evidence, upon oath, against the Princess of W ales at any time, any where? Mr. Baoccliam said, that the object of the question wasjo ascertain whether the witness had ever held such trftrsation with Mr. Johnson, or any body else. The Loan Caastcau.oa understood the witness to say, that he did not with Mr. Johnson or any body else. BROUGH %II repeated the question. Did you ever say to Mr. Johnson—The witness in terrupted the interpreter—lf I do not even know the anew of Mr. Johnson, how could I bold any discourse with him ? The question was repeated. Did you ever say to Mr. Johnson in a stage-coach, that you hail been Awed a sum of money, or a situation under the English government, for giving evidence against the Princess of Wales any where ?-1 will lay down my head if I ever held such discourse ; and I will answer no more, because you ask use things that I never dreamt of, and which never entered my head. Mr. Illactrunsm begged to put sotne other questions to the witness. Their Lordships must be aware that he did not persist in varying the form of these questions without good reason, and that it could not be his wish to prolong this examination unnecessarily. Had yon ever any conversation with Any body in a stage-r0a..11 respecting her Royal Wellness the Princess of Wales ?—1 have never spoken about the business of the Princess of Wales in a stage-coach (ill wee diligence.) Did you ever speak about the affairs of the Princess of Wailes in the course of the journey you had in England, at a e inn, or in any other place ?—Never about the affairs of the Princess of Wales. I never meddled with these discourses. Did von ever, in a diligence or at sit inn, sa that you expected money, or a place under the Englis h govern. ment, for giving evidence against her Royal Highness? —Netter. I never said this—(inai gnesto.) Her long were you Ic England the first time you came neer, when von lived with Mr. Hyatt at Gloucester ? This I cannot remember, because I have not the book in which I made the minute. About how many months?—.Von me rieordo. Be-examined by the Souctron•tiaNzast.. Did tbe witness come from Vienna as a servant of Mr. Hyatt ?—Yes Mr. Hyatt brought him to England. • He was a servant of Mr. Hyatt at Vienna before he came to England ?—Yes. Lord ELLENDOROVOR.—When the witness spoke of her Royal Highness as a prudent omen (Imo 6ntstaa donna), did he refer to her moral character as a woman, or to her behaviour to him as a mistress Creme podrones)!—When there was discourse about ti n ' Princess of Wales, I always said she was a prudent woman (tmonet donna), because, if I had said otherwise, they would have fought me land knocked me down. s Mr. Brim-Guam observed, that in some of the ques tions which lie had just put to the witness, lie by no means intended to impute to any person the offering a place under Government to the witness. Their Lord ships would no doubt see that the questions had been put with a perfectly different view. The answer of time witness to the last question having been read by the short-hand writer, at the desire of a Peer, Mr. BnounitAst observed, that ' bonne donna' had been incorrectly translated. It did not mean a pru dent' but an ' excellent' woman. Lord UNINVILLE thought the answer of the witness to have been inaccurately rendered. He had heard nothing of fighting or 'knocking down' in the witness's an swer. Signor Spinetto, the Interpretor, said the word used by the witness was • altareoto.' Mr. Cohan had sug gested that atteerare' meant 'to fight, or knock down.' Mr. Baoconan said the Interpreter hail neglected to translate the word 'lite.' In fact, the witness had only said that a quarrel would have ensued. The Interpreter admitted that the phrase meant 'to quarrel,' but it had been accurately Enough translated by the words lighting' and knocking down.' 'The Loan CHAPICKLLOR—It ROOM seem. then, that you never quarrel without fighting or knocking down. After some discussion, in whirls the Earl of Morton, Lord Elleisborougli, and Lord Liverpool, participated, it was agreed that the words used by the witness had the import assigned to them by Mr. Brougham. The next witness, Francisco Iloriolo, TM called and examined by Mr. Pan'. He stated the place of his birth, mail in whose service he formerly lived. Were you at any time in the service of the Princess of Wales ?—Ves. In what capacity ?—That of cook. At what time did on enter the service of the Prin cess ?—When her Boys' Highness cause from Naples. I do not remember the time. How long did you remain in the service of the Prin cess ?—About two years or two years and a half. Were yon acquainted with Signor Ile►gan►i ?—Yes. What was Bergausi when yon first knew bin, ?—lie was in the same service as me. Was that the service of General Pino ?—Yes. In what capacity was Bertand in the service of Gene• ral Ploo7—First as valet, and afterwards as courier. flow long were you both in the service of General Pino?—l was in the service of General Pino, and Ber gami in the service of the Countess Pino. How long did witness continue in the service of Ge neral Pino?-1 continued till I nein into the service of the Princess. How long did Bergami continue in the service of the Countess Pino?—He left before I quitted the service of Count Pino. Haab* was witness in the service oft'eunt Pine ? I was la service at three different times. Was in the service of the Countess at those i tires tines?—Yes. I was p a id by th e Co un t, all by the Coolness. ket a. s l waa it heibto yen entered the service of the , Prints's Wales ?—I do Rot know at what ti ne I e n. I speed She sondes of On Prioress. bat it wit whet her Bard Jig:taa sew fro* Venice so ebo lioreaseo lake the lint - r • • • I Were you with the Princess at the Villa V;i:aao?—e' er _ Were you tyith the Prittrees at the Villa d'Eoe?—y.. s. Did you accompany the Princess on ker voyage to Greece? -Yes. Did you act se rook on that voyage!—tires. hut when ea -4 the two ships. I did not always act as cook. Did you return with the Princess . from Orem* to IMly I did, but before he•r rOtarn I acted as cook fnr the Pula-re At what place did you leave the serf ice of the Princess At the Barons. Why did ion leave the service of her Royal Irghzenj... Because in consequence of what was pnt upon me by B er . genii. I could not stand the labour. %VW do on mean by saying you could not stand the labour?-1 mean that there was too ntuedslabour. Dues the witness recollect when the Princessleft Greece' —I do. On the voyage to Pnlestine, does the witness recollect in what part of the 'inhere the Princess slept ?--Gesert!ly under a tent, sometimes below. Where u as the tent placed f—Going to the peep. What was the usual place where the Princess slept, in the voyage from Jails to Italy f—Always under the tent, except when we landed ; this was the more necessary, a we moo board horses and sheep. Does the witness know where Berms( slept on the TOTip from Jaffa to (tat)?—When at Jeffs, whilst on b owl ' the pokere, I have seen him under the tent ; the tent "when closed, the Princess and he were there. Did the witness ever see the Princess end Berganii in 'le morning coming oat of the tent ?—eometiases at a certka boor, not early In the morning. At what time In the morning was It that the witness saw Bergasni coming ont of the tent ?--elornetimes intbrotoortir.g ear 4, sometimes later, a lways to breakfast. Is what part of the • I was site tent placed l—kt Vas Ma. near the bowsprit. Was it always there l—Sometimes it was taken down. Was the tent closed up at night ?—Yes. In what way was the tent fastened at night ?-11* tent sob closed round end covered. Did the vs itness ever see a light In the tent, wbea It s us closed ?—1 have seen a light put out of the tent. Who pet the light oat of the tent do not itntsw 3 I wile saw the light put out of the tent; either Theoduee or impair took it au ay. have vou often seen Bergami is the morning coma out of the tent ?—Several times. It being eve o'clock. the proc•eedinp terminated for the des. Adjourned till to-morrow (this) morning, at ten o'euck. THE QUEEN. ST.ITESMAN-OFFICE, THIS DAY, Two O . AOCS. 1101.75 E OF LORDS, At... fl LORD STEWART AND MAJOCO. After Prayers. and previously to the calling orer the Garter Roll of the Peers, Lord ELLENOOROCGI begged to notice seine imputa tion that had been cast on Lord Stewart, now absent. on the public sets ice, by a Morning paper, founded on the evidence of Majocci. That witness had said, Onion August 30, 1b1 4 .4, on leaving the service of Marquis Merest-316i, be went into that of Lord Swear', at Vienna; now that was impossible, as far as date, because he saw Lord Stewart in England at that time. This did not establish contradictory evidence. Mij oeci absented that be was not certain about dates ; btit although be could not aee that it was improper to secure insportaat . evidence regarding a momentous subject, he was per. saaded that neither blajocci nor Lord Stewart was capable of dishonourable conduct.—(Hear, inent:oned the fact, having seen Lord S. in this cowry in February, March and August, InlB ; and to show thit the imputations on Lord Stewart were as false as Ai were base.—(Hear, bear.) AR.SENCE PROM INDISPOSITION. A conversation took place as tip whetter - skews* - Peers fur a day or two should preclude the right of retiegi and it was ruled that a day or two being absent, would not take away the right of voting. CON birt.7 OF THE NEWSPAPERS. Mr. BROUGHAM begged to state that his re-examination of Majocci had not been founded on any letter, as had been mentioned—it was on most important facts that had come . to his knowledge—facts that he should be able to prove. The ATTORNEY ORNIRAL observed, as the newspapers had been alluded to, hehad to complain that The Times of this morning contained most unfounded observations en the law-officers. Lord LACOCRDALE cared very little about some of the publications; as a proof of what they would say, he was charged with receiving 134,0110 a year frona the public when he had not one farthing.—(A laugh). The Lord CHANCELLOR thought the papers ought to be considered on some future occasion, what mould be done regarding improper publication or attack ; but he could not help observing that one print that had been alluded to (the Peep at the Peer:) contained more Ms. - hood than be had ever before seen collected iu one pub lication—(Hear). Examination resumed. Francisco Borillo was recalled. Having stated about the voyage and tent, Mr:PARK sliced how the Princess and Bergami cow ducted themselves ton ards each other ? Mr. BROCONAM objected to this question, bet it wu ultimately allowed to be put. They were arm in arm. Have you seen then, in the kitchen at Villa d'Este Yes. What did they do there ?-1. 1 1. napkin was spread for them to rat. lo what war diil they eat ?—She cut some pieces. sad said to him (itergaisii) do you eat also. Have you seen them on the Lakes ?—Yes. Were they alone ":—Yes. Bergarni rowed. Do you remember Stahomet ?—Yes. What did he do in the presence of the Princess?— (The witness made *motion.) lotsrpretor..--Hese es I to translate that ?—(A laugh.) Question repeated.-:—He played a part •, he rolled. Wai the Princess there play ed ; she looked and laughed. Maliornet took a " roll" in his hand, and mole a gesticulation. 1 cannot tell what be meant. 1 do not know what be had in his head to repr.sent. Did that exhibition take place more than once before the Princess?—Yes; once in the kitchen, once in the court. The Princess was at a window. _ _ Do von recollect the Princess going to Tunis ?..-.Nah hid she go to the Court there ?—Yes. Did you go to Bergami's bed-room that mOrlilag?-• Yrs, about nine. What did yon go for?—To carry some gloves. 1;c. Did Herganti's bed appear to bare horn slept in ?—At the moment I ram, out of the room or the Deas d'llunwerr, I saw Bergatni come not of the Princess . * room. 1 lifted up the curtains, and saw that his bed was made; and silt scolded tsar, Bow was he dressed ?—He had a sooroing geom. lemakings, drawers. and slippers. Be you recollect marital! at Boron ?—I do. Who were there ?---.The people of the neighbletrbeedi do gentlemen ; people of the middle conditico, sod of flew rank. By Mr. so ' •citam- ..Where did Ito ► c ono ttt is : eight or nine days ago. I ate 1 lived with t.im 3 or 4 years. Whets were you reamitted first on title 10111411t -r About ft or t 3 moonlit age, Where?-.At Milan. By wisum P—A n Mimes.. There were 3Or 4 firPt 4 men there writing. • They Beet for Ns, 4 I 1 . I 'AWES: , I I