The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-03-01 00:00:00

WO . --- "to;oro :if be t n.i hlarhihttenweretoheioteidered a • ; ;h e n, i n deed, he (Mr. P.) Wad that thOest wee • foarful principle in human nature which reidered that man's exclusion a danger to the Sate. But where "enii . difference between the Right Hon. oe:t -ee:Han int/ hi mself ? He (Mr. Plunkett) would pro wyse * Committee of Inqniry. - His ultimate object raid he to render the app intitient of Catholic Bishops , sutler the con!ronl of the State ; and thns at once re :ieve the grievance nail ensure the loyalty of the Ca- Rut the Right lion. Gentleman wanted to 'ems the !natter as it was. He was in like with his danger. But he (Mr. P.) would tell the Right Hon. Gentleman, that the remedy was to incorporate the ‘..;atholic with the State, and to render his privilege oor own security. He would have this accomplished by every thing binding upon the conscience of the Ca ; by removing every invidious distinctions, with out adding even a feather to his power. lie.(Mr. P.) would say, "Connect the Roman Catholic with the E t rlblislinient of the State, take away the brand from bis fo -head, and the shaCkles from his legs, and leave in a situation the proudest on the earth, that of a !oyal E.rglisL subject." He intreated the House out to rject this proposal—a proposal at once of grace a-1 of justice. He intreated them not to send the t atholic from their liar and tell him that he ought not to be relieved. The Right Honourable Gentleman had truly statrol that the Roman Catholics were advancing to a situation of eminence in the State. Their num lo,rs, their wealth, their respectability, their sitnations oor Beets and armies, all showed that they formed a ...onsiderable portion of what were tjustly called the shears of political power. Their demand was justice, .oid the ci y of the meanest individual for justice, be pas persinoled, wonld find a bearer in every nun v.ithin these walls, and every honest man willioo• tilem. Ile would say one word more if the patience of the House teas not exhausted.—lt might be iir. , cd that there would ha danger in admitting the i.rinci;•le of contession, but what did the argument mean ? The ILight Hon. Gentleman admitted also that Geo re was a point at which restriction should stop, and concession Should begin, Where then was that point ? The liight lion. Gentleman would contend that that point seas fixed in the rear 1793. But if the me:Ii;;In had been so critically hit at that period; where was the .lecessit v fur the subsequent alterations ? Why itllow shear to be Grand Jurors, and to fill other otfiees of honour ? Why not allow the same Fivileges to the English' Catholic!, who, front their situation, their dignity, and their patience, were equally entitled to thew.--{Bear, bear.) —The House ought not to object to a. Conlaiittee for tbe relief of the English Catholics. Ender the English Laws a Catholic ought to be a holder of land, which, under some circumstances, would enable hint in effect to return Members to that House, although he could not sit in it himself. Indeed if he were O. go through all the distinctions of absur dity in the present system, he should exhaust the pa t:etice of the Hons... The lawn permitted the Irish Catholie to be cawed to the Bar. The Country wit tteF!sA li;s talents and their honourable applicatio3 in practice. hey encouraged Itiw ; an-I as hen they found bins advancing towards the well-earned reward of his labours they stepped him short s checked his honourable ambition, and left him in the utmost de spondency. Was this just ? was it hottouraile He had the honor to be acquainted with many of the CatholicUentlemen of the Irish Gar,and lt? knewthcm Mt be as loyal and as zealously attached to the Con siltation as any of his Majesty's subjects. But it was not on their behalf he spoke. lie spoke in Ist•- belief the Protestant Bar, far its members were anxious th,t this invidious partiality should be removed. — (Cheers) --The question was, where concession should begin; for if it were clear that the present restri:- liens were proper, the Roman Catholics had certainly no right to complain. The principal object he had in -slew, was the removal of the Oath denying transobstan. tiation and the modification of the Oath of Supremacy lTbe Right Hon. 6. at. was here so exhausted that he sat down for a few seconds to recover himself before read ing his motion. 'I he universal cheers of the House continned until lo* rose again, when he moved—" That the house do revolve 'itself into a Cotnutittee of t.:e whole House for considering the state of the laws with respect to the lining of Hikes, so far as those laws affect lionnu Catholics ; and for considering the expediency of altering or modifying the same." Mr. DENNIS BROWNE seconded the motion. Mr. PEEL said be hoped it was always unnecessary for him to assure the Right Hon. Gentleman that no thing should induce him to attempt to answer his ar ruments, under any circumstances, as that I:ight lion. Gentleman must possess overpowering advantages ; but, on tloe present oceasion,ise i•ati answered a speech rustle by him (Mr. Peel) four years ago, on the dis cllision of the tines:ion it,ov before the house. The Ghat lion. Gentleman had the advantage of tearing to Orces every argument which be (Mr. Peel) had urg e.s.. on toot occasion. The House might therefore ima- Oae under what apurelootsion it was that he (Mr. Peel) ruse to follow that Right lion. Gentleman. .lie would shortly allude to that to which the Right lion. Gmtlnnan bad himself first alluded. He meant the arectionate duty which had been shewn to the memory et a departed friend, under whose auspices the pre ‘rat question hail been so powerfully supported. In toe warns tribute which had been paid to the memory of .dr. Grattan he most cordially joined. it might teem arrogance in him to follow the Right Honourable Gentleman in the terms in which he bad spoken. and Le therefore would rocbcar to do so ; but if he subscribed to all that had been advanced by the Right lion. Gen tleman in praise of Mr. Grattzn, it would eonvinee'all ho heard him that the Rt. lion. (lent. opposite had not been seduced by the partiality of friendship. No man more than hints. 4 could admire Mr. Grattan, al:hough h:. (Mr. P.) bad the misfortune to be his opponent on the principles of bin subject under discussion. The un onesoonable integrity of Mr. Grattan had endeared him 10211; and the desperate fidelity with which he ad hered to the present question was the strongest proof c: I.'m political consistency. But he thought that while t!ie House would agree wttn him in praise of the excel ..nee of of Mr. Grattan, It world also be of opinion wi t h lion, that the cause he advocated had found a worthy s..ceessor in the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite. After *Or preface he would proceed to notice the speech of tt r Right lion. Gentleman opposite, and in the mutet lie s;lotthl observe, that if any man supposed he wished to ailwal to those passions semi prejudices which had been ;laded to by the Right lion. Member, that nun was • n . ;• ler a delusion, for he declared an opinion which in :rod %%mild he a repetition of a former opinion, that ill ,Ise present restrictive laws we had only a choice of .INI .. Ib.i.b . E STATESMAN. • --. minammonnsonanwimsmonmoommmmm"...." llll. ..vile. The *fete of society was anomalous ; anal ,h. I sit in that House; and certainly there was no greater eoulal nntaloubt that ancient animosities would he revered. course silopteri was necessaty, though he I''ss free to reasen for keelnaling them. Foreign or p a p a l in- If a reform in the representative system of the king confess it was not satisfactory. He shotild proceed to darn.b e. with respect to t em, an ce could not dr eaded h d slom were to take place, tending to abridge the terms state his dissent from some of the propositions of the of the existence of each Parliament, it wottla h Right Hon. Member. Did the Right lien. aiember certainly a more estimable class of turn he had never impossible not to anticipate a great interruption of th • suppose that he looked at the state of drings of the known in his life. The?' "ern in all respects a just , domestic concord of the country in the more frequee year 1793, with any satisfaction ? Was it possible that loyal, humane and charitable class of people--(Cheers) rev i va l o f the refigioue feelings which would then be called he could hear the names which had been mentiuned by He was asked what danger he feared would accrue to into action at evrry election hustings in ;he country. A.. the Right Hon. M em b er , as di sapprov i n g of that state the present generation from the repeal of these acts. he had before said, he hail a difficult task to perform air • of things, and yet declare that Ise was satisfied? The His answer was, that be was not guiug to form a this occasion, having so often delivered his sentiment. present duty, he conceived, called upon the House to ex- I t • •,, before in that House ; anal lie again begged to assure fa. • tit t . fo th ems u ion r e present day. He was going w offline anal re-examine all their former opinions; and if I Mew, that in deciding upon this question, the gronnula frame a system of laws which he believeul would be eon they still conscientiously adhered to those opinion, of his decision were by no means determined by leis they might reasonably doubt the infallibility of the irrevocable by future ages ; and when they were mak- nection with any party or any individuate. ,He spoke in great Authorities which had been quoted by the Right ing laws, they had a right to look at the history of alepently of all, anal had ttoi even taken the pains to 4!•• Hon. Mover. The Right Hon. 31eitaber stated his con- the past as the best guide to be obtained through the certain what might be the sentiments of others. ale ception, that constitutionally every subject had a right unknown paths of futurity.• In referring to times ulc'erinined on , as on all other quentions. aeronlinlC to fill an office, and that it was unconstitti- past, he did tional lo exclude him. He (Mr. Peel) contended. • denten broucht in his 11111, he assiated him that, shoal; 1 mouldering ashes of religious feuds and exacerbations, against that position. He would appeal to authoritythe people of Englasal, contrary to what they ought to which were in the present d ay known by uanie equal to that which bad been adduced by the Right s b not his nc was 11011, Member. He thought the Right Hutt. Gentle- • sincere in the purpose he hail stated. The Right thing but the deliberative wisdom of that liouse.—(hear• man would agree with him, that if it was right to ad lion. (ientleinan (Mr. Plunkett) said, that as a reason hear, hear.) —If he thought this navaeore 4.0014 . 1, with mit the Catholic, it was right to admit Coe Protestant , for the c ambulance of the existing restrictions in the safety, lie adopted. not the whole voice of Lnglatel Dissenter. In fact to grant the proposed relief to tne , .s hould prevent him from giving it his support. — time of Queen ElizJbeth that there was a Popish plot' Catholics, would be an admission of the necessity of ' ' • lle should here conclude what lie haul to say to the orbit+ dial not exist liana In the reign of Charles 11. repealing the Corporation and Test Acts.—(Hear.)— 1 • • House, by assuring them that no result of that debate there . was au crawl danger from the Klan bins,. t 111 Here it was that all the great authorities is question - ' cetild g ive him tei l iedilied plc .snrr. lie was bound to feting impreper members for his Council. In the ' left the Rix lit Ilan. :Member. 31r. Pitt declared tbak wish that those opiniuste which he advocated might ne of James ii. it was said there was another species lie cousidered those Acts the bulwark of the constitii" 7 prevail. If they dial, that sort of satisfaction which Of daneer—lie was profeeseally attached to thy Raman tion, and he objected to the principle of their repeal. '. ,• .7 -•* . I • I lie could nut but *it e from the circumstance, would I•einem:es. In the re:gn of %Valiant 111. there was mil , Mr. Burke also, on a great suecasion, n.lien that prin- oe tem iereal by the reflection, that it was tantamount dart ter . But it was t-.) he remarked , there was nothiag • . 1 , • : , . - o f ciiste camas under discussion in that House, staid away I . feared .. .. ' • to a rejection of time claims of a great poi torn th e ir was Hut fa be from the Pope in test day; nothing from Irani the debate, obseri.ing, that he really deserviito fellow-stiViects.--(licar.)-1 1, un the con the bigotry or intolerance of the Pope; but still there able to make his mind up on the question. An alterof trarv, th e e sentiments of the Hi 'hi lion. 3lover shou°4 was su_ficielt danger to warran the _continuance h . authority had been aittoted is ith much confidence. Ithe triumphant. he assured the llouse that no one would the . C atholic restrict i ons . 'Ti e danger wide rejoice WA% Illaiitt•III", who had been quoted in aid of Howl- more than he should to tee all his predictioas tarn authorised our truant:lig ourselves in a similar in let'. Ilut the Noble laird who quoted Blackmone a ! :,noted false; and ail his equine:lts refuted by the h I done e t ill • the t at time, was th e 'ear - :multi searceiy lieve rea•l the whole of the chapter from way,i as we of a t : creasing emicard of the two sects.—( --(lime Right 11 a n power atm Fourteenth on the Con which lie li ad refeereal. Mr. Justice Blarkstone ub- nostrahle li..atleinan sat down amidst Loud and gene finest. Frain tlatse d examples drawn fluor tai Clieema.) served, that when the Roman Catholics disclaimed past,. then be Lad a right to say ? !ha l t . r if at the te lea t. :i scri bed to them, the Penal Statutes might be the fiSir JAMES MACKINTOSH commenced by observ ve perm I. of our *story, there were live a went . relief% ed ; butt i: did out follow from this passage thatinc • that if the Right Hoe. tient. whaa had just eat down alanrere to be miaaltel a g a i ns t, he had a ridge to as time exclittlillZ Acts should be also removed. The con- • r• that ," • of - mne, a nee ger a nature not to ue airmen in felt reason to refer to the disadvantages lie laboured tine teary was evident, fur Blacketune went on tu speak of • • • t i w. present day, might trine. up in future tunes. It I der, in having to follow so powerful a speech as that of the excluding Acts as applicable to all Diesetaters.— • • ". . ~ . . had been said, si hat hall the State to do with rcitg . un: ; the mover of their greet question ; if lie (Mr. Peel) The authority of Illackstune was therefore cleerly i u In reply, it nalgiat be said, that when religion hail no- I should here Ibl:eight he had reason to complain at being aaa'.ast the repeal of the excluding laws. lie whu . ht, i , - thing to do aids the State, the State uuuld have no• tallied up on to rise immediately alter the great display in reference to time History of England , commence I . • . . • , passing by the period at whirls i thing to do with religaun. But how mould it be o f t h e rro ai g i o us t a lents o f his Bight lion. Prierie, who with the Refo r mation; shenai Iliat religion was net connected with atfa!rs of . I had riften been admired for IA commanding power's, the Roman Catholic was the established Religion oft State? Could it be infa rred front the pages of the ; never so greatly exercised an upon this night, when Ito the country. The Act of the Ist of Elizabeth required I . m History of England, of Feed:nal, or of Irelanal, the -s' • ' A► ; sclr time te-'est master of eloarience an:l reae every persin in alfice to take an oath, Am. _ _. : • Lew(•a .m.um .g not onl y that nu I three H istory of this(nude e a I • lel other person bad jurisdiction in this kingdom, but, I . • the: c •,... • . %., ••• ll ' . " c • suiting now exime.sug its 'medic lif,•, how attach more au i . t• eines i a coma say te at aniougst affirmatively, that Queen Elizabeth had jurisdiction " en-ing . be (Sir J. 11.icklutcsli) imitled to crave their huh& the motives which indueneed man as a political ineiti-f spiritual as well as temporal. The sth of Elizabeth whin his duly was to follow in expressing a ceat bee of the State, red aii had nat its blare% in the genre ; ' required every Knight, Citizen. and Bargees to take i words of the 11.11 of I t L .' l. Itei . o.i, it 6 ,4.. 4 a ; ,... t of f cisleace of opinion nit!. a wan who had exhausted every a similar oath. The question was, v:s uhl the Romanl part of Ida .o..vet.—(:lady)—Tbe Right Hououreble , the Con,:itutissu of this a- lute: ). s lie . rctimembe i red il • Catholics of the present day la" tats " In -: ' i wasals of the :ligh t ;imam'. i s le 1:, ale , an NI . lEt 1 1 . . • . .. ... I .. ( r. •it - • tieutletuan, however, who spoke lest. he most like tits they would not, it followed that the Roman Ca- ghee ) a i I VI • tif of observing , wailattributed to t ?sr . on time awe:v.o;m art that 1.111. lie then caae: daunts of that day were objects of even Las jea upon the I I soma•e, as an 'argument tOr going . into the Friend 'propositions alibis he bail not laid down, loss. Imlay than they were at present.—(ilear, hear.)— t .• „itl.:et. to dn so hi , of . . .„i auchi as he bad i a 1 • r time purpose pilot.; eats'''. c- .. serge hint sviih advocating anciall .l.- %%amid pass over the reigns of Charles the Second . 4 ' " ' tlon, and restoring concord to a great portion of t ied emancipation. His Right Hon. Friend bad taken anal Jam as the Second, and come at once to tl.e Revolu- • the snbjects of the Ilealue And the Hight Hun. Gen- 110 suds ground—he had spent a great part of his ar titan. Ile bad to apologize to the douse—(t'lle-rs.)— theican would remember that a great part of what be , enment to ridicule those Statesmen who pretended to but really the groasal in question haul been 'al lden so (fir. Pere ) said in l'• 1 - a.r. • est tl • Committee , was to reduce all legislation to abstract principles. The Right often, that taere was little 4 ,i.„ but to : fir Cast which it inability to give that concord orsatisfaction, lion. (lent, (ale. Peel) had eadeavoured to chew that Lad been ergeal before. lie woutld whet that although the Laws of Exclusion were coeval widt• the Itafortua- "n "l'ich the Right Hon. Heade:min so much Insiste d . there were a series of dangers fr o m the Catholics Irons lion, yet that circa:in:mitre ought ta be no her to the Let the Right llnn. lieistleitiaa refer to the Hill framed the Reformation to the time of King William 111. But claims of the l' stimell.e; ii they r:ere well founded. Nay, on that occasion, protasedly fur the purl:me of doing the fact was, that there was one danger, via.—eke thonfiltha ill!, of Rights itself had este:tided them, lie Awa y ..% 'oh th e z aa laati a s un d er w hi c h the C a tholics • ' • only - existence of a great Catholic body connected with some wouls te a r here the fi rst to consent to a reteuval of that lab, lured, anal 4.f which they coat a lained. lie . . exclusion if it should appear that they l''ll of ' li g ht ' would final l', mt three fourths of that Ball was taken un i•oreign : t ower. T hroughout the whole of the times was the foandation of an act of injitstiee.—Olear.)--lie . • ' • that he had enumerated, the danger was one and the haul heard an euleeinni on the character alt Wing 11 il- with imposing restrirtions, to giant against the dan g er s a me; healing the s u -se di iracter —evident, great, anal limn anal oil la. o pinions ; but what were Close opiilionsf whialt the Itielit lion. lientlettain denied dial or °Mild urgent. As his Right lion. Friend (Mr. Plunkett) It was preimeed 'slide he was Prince of I )r.in::e, to ad- exist. Such was the nature of those precautions. that said, every alesiati tttt from time principle of the law of mit lite friends into power, if he would conseta to u se th e words of the ►!Light Honourable Gentleman, ' g ' En land that every Englishmen had a eontnien riebt to the repeal of the Corporatioti and Test Acts.and title to competency for otti .e in the State. had .. •t 1";1 114puled' I • the Catholics u 1. s gra .ng Ilie opinioev of that Jay wer• au apalicallie to the pre terms %dad& the most jealous Protestant could not oh- temporary dative. The li:glat Honourable Hea -1 sent oecas'ome that lie (Mr. Peel', wi•la the peralssium jest to, or die most scrupulous or inveterate Cadiolie ttauntan who up, ...nett the doctrine, admitted that there lof the II- nse, would trail them. 'I he Prince's an- I re j ec t. lie was correct, netwithstanaiec he believed, was no present alaiseer, bet sail thst his o pinion w at tl e d swer was addressed thiongli the Pensionary of 1110 - I in stating, that this Bill Fsi framed was generally repro- F.ltllt• an diet whiclaaemeted the ar e at fea s t esat ata Iv a s laud to the then Ling of Eat:eland, atel the answer i hated by a great part of time Rend-% Clergy, who eonsi- is el secure I to theism all the blessings of time Revolution, ra n as fellows:—•• and if his M a :i t —le ;Mai; fit to' alereal Ow they were not able to give time pledges it re- viz. :—to prov'..le against fu'lmre r4)ntingencies. If he repeal the p „, a a l ava. she) . „ 1a .,. re-aa v to cooseitt I / aired. 'risme was, he believed, a general feeling of compared these sentitia ate, he fllolllil say they were thereto, but stili;eet to the excinsion of the Roman Ca.! aislin°!l°."" iii the Cathsolla laity , which led them to diastia ideally oaposite. Tar Bight Hon. Gentleman sail, tholics." And again afterwarals---•• gut they canal at 'a r t a d e e r r n i s i: •tuir.u..l.l! conditions.a.lst state to T t b i t ! I:4 i f s l e l e l : r i; t: e a x c i es t • t p; i 'lg that . an alterasion in the British . Constitution would he praduetei lay the repeal of Ole 13th of Charles 11. Ile consent to Ow repeal of those lama !,v which Cie Can- , ra ; :posimion to the au Write of the Clotreh g of Rome • f it: "r tau:ugh: it a hard matter that an Art so obtained as that siltation is preeerv,•3 against the designs of Item ai :they haul the sanction of the Pope to give those plte i l • s ae was, slainhl he so difficult 'of getiing *repealed. There ;,; t : study to increase their power, which is as flan gorous to i tery f r e t an toed. conscience they could not-:givr. 117- was no law sa infamous in its origin, or produced lay Catholics." In another part of the auswer was i cherished no hostile feelings' against the Roman Clitlin• midi a combination of villainy, as the 13th of Charles indeed he should be most ungrateful, if he alaa the following passage: —" Time Boutin Catholics, 1 lies ; the Second. It was !mescal on the Ynth of October, 107:4. by being in Parliament, must naturaily study to i ::then "a",. in i oca t ie , lie . tlioarlit it hi s i duty sopeeienti- How had time !Linos employes! itself previously to tits I , .) 1 1:11 1 1 . i_ . . 1 te ;_la . l ill ~ as . l . e i I now . , and h !s i t passing of this Bill 1 linty 641 they prepares! themselves increase their pewee, which was den reams to the . ' t i etr freest la achnow lealgi al hat tire Ca.:mars:sin aye • a f o r tunes great exercise of deliberative wisdom, anal Protestant Religism . :, since all Li th:wer leatrd inure I hint the justice toappreciate the motives lay is bleb he ected. e; statiiiiiii y of tent .r, so necessary to c i banal in han I or less to their Tynan's." Timis was thee 01.111 . 1011 4 , f •He did not charge the faitloolics with h bag less able in i legislating on such a question ?-. They had been em- Late King William ; but he(Mr. Peel) had ether audierity ,to discharee the laieli alutlee of office ; still lie dill ployri in racaininitig at their Bar , Titus O ates. It was to sham that there was no *mil ri a lit as that al tau. ; nut think they ouelit to be entrusted is ith them. If wino their initials were intosiemeal by the infamous pc r a4lmission into office of every subject. Ila. ware,: cam- . lie were a Catlin: le he never Manila! think it is rong to jeries which had refused the death of so many innotent p,.l.4uns, toy that itisimmon . s wretch whose name stained the m enee with the Act fur the Toleration of Prot .stant i estimate his own Church in the State. Was there any annals of the Legash histery, that this law was enacted. Dissenters. In the reign of talent Alive a Bill was I timing in past history which tend pt amn tended to exempt Roa • • • . • !he fed o perjurire of the nm eXecrable miscreant that brought into Parlienient for depriving Diseenters of I Catholic from that suaaeion which he (Mr. Vera) if a eeer slanvedbis fare at the liar of a civil tribunal as a that 1' okra ion. It Was called "An Aet to c..lopel 1 Iloneet Uatholie, and in a Protestant aanietry, woul ILe false maim' s, bad induced time whole Legislature occasional conformity." It teamed the ('.+:n mete, bit stib'e•et to ? But a . tiont;ls Is. tun ngimt that aitimrelmen- mil time cautery to pass a law which. after years hal itanet with consider:dole oppasition ill tile Loruis. A si ins might lie eutertailleal fcom the aulaption of the elapse:l, and nav generation' sprung tip, it was now conference was agreed to, and managers ware aim,mint- principles laid down by the Right Ihunottralale Urania.- inquoseible to reaeal. The Hon. and Learned Uentle ed to conduct it. it would here he hiehly proper to man, he was fete to acknowle site that if he' could went into a review of the circumstances attending the notice the persons appointed to conduit the conference t thina that this measure would opera:e materially to different period of history in. which the question of on the part of the Lords. They were the Earl of restore that concord and satisfaction. a aiejaavhatever Catholic aisabilities hail been aeitated, in order to sitp- Peterborough, Loral lialifix, Barnet, Ili • hop of Salis- I might be his views on this question, he as ardently port his pasition that time restrictions haul been plecal bury, time Duke of Devonebire, and Lord Smut as. It at'- I desired to see established as the Right Honourable on the Cathelics '..i war 1 off • soine . temporary danger. peared that the !emelt , urged in support of their azgu- tien•leman—all his fears for the Clitircli Estabiisb• The Right lion. lientleinaa haul alluded to the cat+, of meats against the Hill, their opinion that the Chard' anent wauld give way in favour of that dm sirahle con- the Quaker!, in whieli• allusion he thought hint was in no danger Cum the Protestant Di-seaters. summation. No one wished more that' be did. to see unfortunate. .1 h..• no: admitting Quakers was n , There was a Resolutiou passed, which in substance de- the religious parties in Ireland living its harmony and kse to thein. bat was a great loss to society. St dared " that the Chureh of Englantl, as happily saved cornet union. But he um far froa. thinking tbat that the establielitnent of that sec `, great apprehensions be King William, of blessed memory, was not in data would be the effect of the measure receintliendeul fly the were en.terta'oesl, as were o .se of the Catholics. Bat ger ; and that whoever went about aleclariag that it was Right Honourable Uentleinan. lie tiid believe, nut- it had tnrned out that they were the most tranquil nut ,1 uin danger, was an enemy to the Queen and the State."— withstanding these restrict i v e laws, that the reli- peacsable Sect in the kingdoms,. All the ezperience Time Managers appeared to admit that the Hiss: raters glans parties in Ireland were approaching to a much past dine referred to by the Bight Hun. Ilentlemnaa were peaceable amid well disposed; and be (Mr. P.) was more social state than ever . ex:steal betweep onlythat whilst o f were refused their rights perfectly ready to admit the same of the Romani:mho- them before. It might be asked why, if the they wonlal be the candies of the State. In moan- - lies. Witat was the distinction drawn by the Managers? causes of most of the dissensions in past Cuies idon, the lion. awl Learned Gentleman said, that as is They said that "tile regulation of 0,: ces belonged to were time religions and commercial mouopuly of this was given tout that his Majesty was going to visit tee the Legislature, hut that Penalty and Panislinieut was country, which still existed, he did not iledire to • pal lead, he hope.l he would be enabled to do's. not as a of another natute.”—(Cheers.)—This was the tonsil- an end to one part of that monopely. if he desired to Conqueror, as all his predecessors nt.'s, but as the mem ! tutional doctrine of the great Lord Somers. If hr i cement more closely the harmony which he stated to senger of peace, and the bearer of that Cuistitutioo • (Mr. I'.) therefore objected to the general admission of . lie beginning to manif est itself? it *as expres'ely to which was no Joneet to be viewed as a boon, but on Dissenters", be had a right to object to die motion of : a void disturbing that harmony that he opposed such a their p art as a ti g ht. - t h e Ri g ht Hon. Member in favour of Roman l'ailmiles.. : Niterture- He must state honestly, that after having Mr. PEEL ex k l,,ineal. There was a most respectable class of has Majesty's I conferred the capacity to possess power, he was afraid Lord BURY sapported the uweion. He consider,. I subjects who would not take an oath at all, and he did that there would remain no rutin* of maintaining that the Irish C th 'Sias were entitle I to the atluei- il3 not see why the same argument should not 'be offered an equal division of powir beiwixt Cathol i c and Pro- of .a:rir Claims, tram the exemplary c uraluct which in favour of them also ; for the law bad pat them on testant. He did Ihiqk that thire would 'be a ion- ,had ale are distin • gumimed them Limier every privation. the issue footing with the rest of the coiammaity 10 all stamtstragglefitr poi or. thievery occasion of lie-, Daring tie hoateet mows op p( party Seal they bad a•lees of property. Why then exc l u d e t h e coo k er , ? presentative for the peopligeingebosen, if a Pcoteetait never given the slights• t ttlehlirs. o ehi. at to veaitian :n It was known ;hat a Quaker bad et en heca returned to and Cathulie candidate were opposed to each otier, .14 ally shape. • • .. • t~. 1t , $