The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-02-18 00:00:00

-toe applied. H. strongly urged his Hon. and Learned Friend l Abirellso. not only to withdraw his motion, bat lainsediaitily to follow ttp_thateigpsbpittvillifer tt Committie orrepury. ---- - Mr. WILLIAM SMITH expatiated tit he evils et the present — system; and satet - thar hid calved a stetter in teltiiit thee* etilistril i amply de tailed. Mr. WARRE espressed his satisfacitios that'an enquiry was about to be instituted into thesubject. Sir M. W. RIDLEY bad always beets impressed' . with the expediency of hieing the affishises in the Northern Counties series, in the year, aid thanked his Hon. and Learned Friend fot the motion which be bad sabinitted to the Hoarse. Mr. WYNN, although he felt that Mune Mauer* was necessary, yet was glad that MS Hon. and !warn. ad Friend was about to withdraw Nis motif", to which he Geoid not have couseated, toosiderieg the sear approach :of the s Spring Assisea, tad that no lowan whit bad a snit would be isfliciendy atom of the stow arraegeseent. Mr. TAYLOR then withdrew his alt . end gse notice that he would to-morrow for a Committee of Enquiry on the subject. • • • ' Sr F. BURDETT presented a -POllll6l from person called Jima Leach ; and another frills Reich.' able, in the county of 'Ancestor. The Petition stated, that James Luck had hue apprehended and artist - frets the place 'where be resided to various parts of the country : that when he had complained of his treatment,• the person to whom he spoke had 64 d—sed•his Feed limbs," and told him if he would not bear what he had, he should have en iron collar round his neck. The Petition, after static` various hardships which were said to have besm endured by the Petitioners, concluded by praying for redteis for tbeir gr ievances.-T -Read tied laid en the table. Mr. BROUGHAM had to beg the attention of 11016!.10.1 Petition from another of those onfor. tinsels even wh o had been the victims of proc ee di n gs dlroOd by t he Secretary of State, armed with the powers,,. ion him by the despension of the Habeas Coq* Act ; and be entreated that peootaten would 40 hi, the frieour to listen to the statements which that retitioo contained, and they would be aware of f*icrtance, and be disposed perbeps.to iate 'it. The PetitiOn - was from one Benjamin Scholes, ' et AValtt'..fi r eid, in Yorkshire, where be M i d resided July last. !Ie was a victualler and ale-house. fiaeper by tvhich busineu it vie stated be b ad sup ported himself and his family with comfort. In the suonth of July, however, he .had been apprehended by a warrant from Lord SidmQuth, thrown into pri son, and 'notwithstanding the prison of Wakefield was wail secured and well regulated, he bad been conveyed to BO castle of Cambridge. There be had been detkined till January, in whit* mouth be hal beau set at liberty without any more Cause 'foe his liberation than bad been stated for his deteu. tieno—Ellear, hettr!)—lst consequence of his sin. pr . loeisosso s, he had been ruined, Nis tope and be+. Isrokete op, and himself materially iojeret iii his health. .fie (Mr. Brougham) had in his pos. pestling a cettifitate from a respectable Member of the Collegb'ef• 'Surgeons who had atteuded his t , whichdeclaPed,` that the confinement which the Pe.. thinner tied endured had caused the illness en*, which he bliti laboored. His health was broken, and he was reined in eircumitances; and he had now ro state to the 'loose the sole reason of those pro. ceedhigs which he had been able to discover. A . cbarge had been laid against him by two persons of the names of Oliver and Bradley—Ether, Near I]-44r. having been concerned in . Meetings held in ,hb bin house for seditious purposes. The particular! • of that transaction be should relate to the Souse.— Scholes lint became acquainted with Olivir through thiletroductioe et a person of the name of Mitehell, who was travelling about Yorkshire, as others bad donfiht• various parts of the country, protenditsg to come from Societies in London, and making use of the names Of the Honourable Baronet the Memberfor Wouttainster, as well as that of his Noble Continue: In the Course of their proceedings, Oliver, es the Petition stated, yes very constants. in instigating *holes to go farther ; rind, not to trouble the House With ikon 'then one instance of his connect, ,be might state that Meer said it was in vein to petition, peti tioning was of no Gni that they mast have recouree to physical fnrce.— [Hear l hear !]- 7 -Scboles in con sequence bid some suspicions °bile mao, and his an • ewer wee, that he threstenoid fli.lay an information ogainst him before the Magistintes. Thee came Oliver's plans, for he being • threatened isitit imsore, lid wooer found himself in danger a R. !ti formation which could be supported by good eii4eao, than, with his sassociates, he wrote circular:Mb*s or) call a Meeting at the liaise of ttiOPetitiOner.— Scholar *Mei 'that. soda e Meeting loia-vsoOettn held at his house. He thought that othireirconv. eta nces might "brow mach light upon that fact; lu deed. he believed that an Hoe. Friend of iris had found means to obtain some Information *on that point ; that he had discovered Oliver himself consplain. ing to others of the slackness of Scholes,and of his r fusing to allow Meetings to be held in his bronse. Vicar !]—The Petitioner denied that he ever bad been present at any such Meeting in his life. in deed, ha stated, that be never hatiny knoeriedge of any, hut one, for promoting the cause of constitu tional Reform, which had ended In a Petitiel that bad !wen presented and received by that House. En.. . t uiries had been made, and the melt of these had been iu every Way favourable to the Petitioner's the.' racier. He stated that, because he did not think it sight to bring such charges rashly, especially when they involved • considerations of such importance. — 'rho first reason that be had for believing Scholes so be a person of good character nos, that he bad at different. *periods filled olio, of con. eiderable respectability. He had been emplOyed is &pail...constable irrihentighboOoortuf Wakefield, et e pitied of dlartirhentO, endlitincipilly by his SI- Wises it deptity4institble, • ;knee ha. been. 'se; well peeserved, that the provisions of- the Watch and Ward Act, then in force, were almost directly was- - isd to be applied. In consequence of the vigilance .shich he manifested, his services were received o ith Asd aolliatent to hero s er si es libib they _„.,- ue entrust, flitb ea kat, powers'. But what had been the result? Thu only Instance whit!, we know of arty' outrage having &deep frosi.the which said to prevail, was that which occurred in Derby-, sltire,which trerfellOwed by a Waller' HighTreasno, and three individuals sainted the punishment -thelaw. • No Gentlessian had shown this any otliarl Cale of • treason had been found to eels,. ihuseis v i ,evident, therefore, that tilftrialers of Atm country had been esaggerated beyond their .propel dlmelksiams; 'And that they might bare bass remossr),ked Goryro. -meat taken a afferent course from that which they load pursued. With relopect to the manner in which ,Miiitiaters bad exercised the powers given to them.* Abe Act for suspending the Habeas Corpus, the very fact of asking for a OM of indemnity was a.anagfts• son that they bad abused the laws.--Cflear !1" -They 7641:Wide& the law in pll respett a t it att be was at a • . . • , ns' to .now bow Geutlpmen w e tbem ulves inthe eyes of their.ronstitnentit, in whet man they could reconcit" it to !gait own.conscleoces jlo grant an indemnity under such circumstances. It was admitted on all heeds, that the Suspension of the Corpus Act gate no new powers of.detaluing or dismissing persons.-iflear, bawl from Sir S. . felts A COUltairitr i = ll—. These dilleag tinfoil, *mild meg& Wl° -Iced 1eid...111, wt c m eapjctabte persons,-.Mod item them- be um .inters. ed, that be had fort pay yearafalalled Aerloilea hippest] on him with the greatest propriety. $0,104 hold communications os she solljoct with the Noble 'Lord; lie Neither forirorks4tei who was suitors el well as the eeperable person age to wits rated ; and he *O4 reed eau' or twoleeters which would Inform to what eiNel the chewie i . of the Petitioner. [ ha Hoe. istelb LearnigiGenslemao them read an extract from a I. ter, whit)" ten pearly thus —t` .1 haveleken some: pains to empire idto hip (Scholeee) Veer as t , weed it lest prepossessed with an unfavourable opinion or: him. 1)0 l em no w thoroughly canyinced, that Is& has been most unfairly dealt with, and that be had no more connexion with any illegal or.seditioue . deeigni than Mr. Witberforce--Iffear, hear!)--, or the most jedlicerit man in the kingdom; sod F t have do delibt that this WM m ost evidently appear, i' if i fell 'and fair investigation can be bed of. his case'l—The suspicions of th e teen's .character,! which appeared to have been 'Wedgwood, were the! consequences of all such cases. The moment it wec heard that a map had been apprehended on a charge of High Treason, or of any thing seditious, he was in . shindy suspected of being a very bad character.— The Honourable Member (Mr. Wilberforce) would tathat his name hod only been introdoced as the striking person of that kind that was suggested to the writer. The - Petitioner,. in one put of his statement, related ti circemstince . which be should' read to the liouse.—[The Honolitable and toadi ed Member then read, a part of the Petition,' which prayed that the House would take the meat he had made into consideration, and ,that they would grant him such redress as they in their mercy and clemency might think proper - and that they would use such interest with the Se cretary of State as would cause him to return the papers which were taken from him, and an old memorandum.book, the property of a poor widow, which furnished the outy evidence she bidet a debt that Ares dee to her of 171.] It was was singular, that after all be had en. parienced—he would instance that as the most stens. Ing proOt of his character—that after all he had es dared, be.asked but for the property which bad be. longed to himself and others to be restored to Mau-. Recalled for nothing to be done to those by whoa be bad suffered ; lie invoked ne vengeance upon their beads ; be demanded no jestice; but he trusted that would not bit held as any @roosting for their turning etleef ear to what was laid before them; he hoped that they would no longer have evidence so repeafgd-', .ly : proffered, without allowing those who weft urn posed to possess it to adduce their proofs. the Petition was then brought up, ready laid ess OM table, and ordered to be printed. Mi. F. DOUGLAS moved for au Acioint of all fFees sod Am • Doles on Pardons passing the Great leal.-4Yriered. r • PERSONS eON FIN Ell ON SUSPIC I ON OF TREASON. Lord FOLKESTONE rose to nil lbeethalle o of :the House to a subject of the utmost importance, and which claimed from them the most serious consider. tion. - Inn the first place he should move, that the Petitions of Francis Weed, Joseph Mitchell, Thomas "Evens the elder, and the several other persons who bad been Imprisoned under the Act for suspending . the Habeas Corpus Act; and who bad petitioned the, Pious, to investigate the treatment which they bad • received, should be 'mitered as reed. • (This being 'dime, the Noble Lord proCeedid as follows.) When the Elyse considered all the circumstances detailed, in thole Petitions., he was persuaded that they would think it their ditty to pease, before they were induced. to entertain, as a waiter of course, a Bill of Indus oily. He had been led to introduce this subject to, Abele notice at the earliest opportunity, because the. Noble Lord (Castlereagh) had stated that a Bill of Indemnity was to be brought forward, not foribt grave and effigies discussion of the House, not as a, measure that was to depend on its own merits, and, to be rejected or approved-as the conduct of his Ma... jesty's Ministers should warrant; but as a measure, which the Ministers were entitled to demand of the, House, as a matter of course, and which the House, is, itclesislative capacity, could not refuse...-. It appeared to him (Lord Folkestone) thud a strange confusion prevailed in the minds pt several persons with respect to that Bill. They ,seemed to think that it was really due to the Miul. sters of the Crown, as the Noble Lord had stated, without any previous investigation; but if he knew any thing of the principles of our Constitution, he would be bold to say, that it was the duty of the House on this occasion not to take awe so olOF,hif the blioletties of 'the Crown at °t r ibe Kbertlei of . * People.-(Near!)—Before they suffered themselves to abseil, countenance to a Bill of Indemnity, they should see that the People had not been damnified: they should first appoint a Committee to siamine the, grievances which the Petitioners bad stated, and .to ettertaie whether the Ministers bad not exceeded' ja r powers. Nothing could be more hostile to the spirit of liberty, nothing more destructive of that geperons plan of power which our forefathers had 4.tlrered down to us, than the doctrioe that a Bill &labia nature should lie passed as a matter of calm,. r i s s ring the last hundred aid twenty yam, lb. Ss belts Colipoe Act bed been suspended line or tea times; bat there was only one instance, the Noble Ler& and his Colleagues could Out' only cite preen abet, et a Bill to indemnify Ministers. for the wee sites which Amy had pursued seder the Suspension. It ens singular, too, and not the' least point ta i l; :required attention, that almost the. eery same pe.rsone, that apptied fur a Bill of ludereolty who a Ppli edfer. it now. They were acting, theretore, ne a Preeede4i which they bed:tirade for tieutieleee; they wits calling open the Nouse to 'emu Skeet keel the con. i eegeences attigeirlage rinlationsit the law, ovally, ; nib" , "gated, ittiiaa'a &key 4d t i r suet' cotKaitleitteis Wort.: seen might thini'd this matter, it . wits a euriales fact, that the system now proposed to the House was of vest modem date: be bad taken some pains to look o t egi. This _ ... Ronsills.l As to taking op pmsens in a different form, atid executing warrants in a different mangier, from the ordinary coarse of proceeding, they might look in vain to the Suspension Act for . any sort of justificetioti. The law had eppoint . .d regular sad stated forms by which persons sere to be oppre. ended and .discharged ; theme teems were resell id by the authorities of our law books, and by Acts if r Parliament; but, in the premat intflaUCe, not one of those forms had been pursued. lie would not dis. pate the power of a Secretary of State to lois, a warraot, but it was nodoubtedly an usurpation, end the practice was not of ancient date. It was only confirmed in the time of Iciug WiliVm, when one of the Jsdges, as appeared by Sir Bartholome* Shower's Reports, declared, that a Secretary of State had power to a dminister ao oath, because be had power to commit; bet Lord Camden had lad, that if a Secretary of State cennotodminieter an oath, he cannot commit. He (Lord Folkestone) would not now dispute the power of a Secretary to issue a war rant ; bet some of the grottiest lawyers bad pro noanced their opinion, - that it was a complete usur pation, and how it ha d arisen nobody knew. It was, in fact, a perfect anomaly; and it it is to eaist, power should be giveu to • Secretary of Stale to administer an oath; in order to destroy the anomaly. With respect to forms, he certainty did not findeity. statute, or any judicial decision, by *high a parti. celar form was babe gone through b y the Secrets, ' H ri of State; but the same forms . shoild be 'eaded. to; on these occasions es were adopted its ordineey -cases-. In all cases or felony, a. Just ice of the Peace Mew: take the esimination its writing of the accuser and witnesies oa oath, and to send it to tee_ proper Court. It is not to be *opposed, then, Melt if this necessity vista is Ulterior cases, it is out to be fel lowed in superior eases: if particelar farms are ft -guired in felonies, the sante precantiots should be tykes towards those who are accused of the crime: of treason. If 'a Jessica of the Peace commits 'for treason, he must proceed in that way ; because he ,commits not for treason, but for a breach of the pear.. ;Now, none of three, loons, as far as he (Lord F.) !bad been able to ascertain, had been followed in the• recent proceediago. In mord to the first Petition? , arbich be presented, it appeared that the warrant torus the arrest of the Petitioner (Frencis Ward) ari . . ,ginated nit with thaSecratary of State, but the Ma. !gistrate at Nottinglsin, end that t h e parties entered :the house, and refused to show the warrant. He 'had been told, that, with respect to the treabitent of the people at Nottingham, great exaggerations had• been made, and probably it might he so ; het hi would lutist, that .irons should not have been semi in any of these eases, unless 'absolutely necessaryr: He caeld.not help observing, that though the Settle tory of State might have given directions that these people should .not be ill-treated, yet be took are that all those who are the proper guardians of such persons, the Magistrates and Justices of the Peace,. should be prevented from aecerteining whether they were ill used or not—(Hour, hear !)—ond therefore if they were ironed % be was responsible for it.-- . -Some of the grietranotr Might be expressed in language rather too strong; best he did not wonder that - per. sons taken away from their families, and subjected' to solitary confinement---a peoishatent unknown to' the old law of England, and net inferior to death itself—should consider themselves much eggrbned; illit*arose -themselves in tie itrengest teints.-.' ppe mil by am eases epos the &wank of ,the Haase, that in the year 1689, Lord Caollfertine, a Member, was compelled to the Tower, wider a *arrant of the Secretary of State tar High Trespon: and the Hone being informed that he was not all o wed to see his friends or servants, an order wits wade that they should be admitted to hint o .,t a Bill shon:d he bro io to preyeot_solitary lleoprittsli‘ o-' t, audthat AIL A - Galati! *Geld peoreiiier ihr keeper. A t were the Resolu linos of the Centeennsat that time; and he hoped that the House would follow the w i mple, and appoint a Committee to can wipe into the Ire& if the mattersamed is these Petitions, and take manures for • pivieg redress.— [Hear. bearl3—He wow called the atteetional flow to the ewe of these people. He . maintained. dot 'they had been committed to prison with. oat the orillisacy womanf the law. and had been dismissed -It this - • watt {leis doctrine, if adm itted to - this extent.- would lead to. W I Honourable Friend fotr. M. A. 'P ; 'Palo!) had soltme ' by Or juiiiicc in eke Northern CountielTiind -. wo u ld ; .M 44 0 r : 04 eviamitipeitt of a tie;rdoi; Ort .4' t: a titit If cretary of State, to mVi at jail in ddlitot after Ile Assizes s there heleiglif ye for it "ROI. and olitia Dear approaoli of the Amigo, mg#Ot he 14 ivi!id AP okittopstriu t • ~ 4 who had Ani,rifjit to conionit him, unit dic:saeaeØ without hut: ioc any Feast* fist "hhlting . imiriscitioiseist. bort; :ikcase um* arise daily future petite n,the tour aertbera t essautiev. if the principle lately ated itglitwere.oiltottted to Me law. li might egriir strange, drag lie - 0110)„ .. was lio ficcilhidi,la waif* imprisonments, ( who Omur . a the arrest an d ircionwat i tV2 persons whe had sulfated tiy them - were Racaurti !few stiog n i,.. precite, should yet complain of their discharge; - Wein U l*k coopjdariuina it would be alloWed that he wax wimp con;istesa. ille,complaitied of the 'miniver la which theme.. were disekirged..hrquise it took from IbT i all rietheibilas., imoseit derived them of all means of clear mete saizza, . an, .pp 4 aAatm _compensation roe -the losses 'bey iii( TO t* . nardioldpo Au which. the,' 11141 heels lid4lgh"4- ,Norio 1 was not his July. motive, no! wash( thelissjy.cLuty ug t h e 11„... to see tbescasen righted. •lt . wee, the ditty of ilietiowe Iv take matte s of the • violation of the lows., and •to punish those who were their violators. thwNit' Ow • 1 ' 'ill"" CA had no connexion with the iransectioOr in qUeSti O4 :l ;114 bad no ponisslaiais to makeagainst the Gofer...sow .-Lorm ie hear 11--ire anial ogio ~,,b„, wo stud is a (Wulff ,!earir. ii% E ssi, the !L. . . t hat n , s person of cooseveiree w•AvAitiprisimigit t.u.ter iii , Sas in Art. that no (i. ailetonit w. ode tett ski, matte"complaints be heard throagrythis :lie** 4 , 1: % speeches, that a.. victim w• s made *h ose fa:v and sr ''' could cache, the attention or colt forth the. , r . country,- the Noble Lord declared - his betief that sorb ' I , .., was tree; lad that Ilia liajest3'icbtini-teti were well ad ' from the how rook of their l'tfitiliees of . ssas . UM at 'fate, or the se. writs , . they derived ..- , the row ..... _ _. .. Th••V - Seised upon them because they vomited victim of kind tu jellify their measures, and it situ tot &Wet° iik t , others whin would not have submitted so qu tett . 1 , , their[ ba.e accepted of their diochararou such rondllim•s, who mad neithes have been imprisoned no to ned out of prise* *Wiest crentiog some noise —(Hear, beer!].—not only oer tie r4141E of them victims such as to preclude-them from rankinginvircuas. plaints be beard with efeet. but the Home was told That is e , complaints ought not to be listened to. because their alatioint were false. It bud been argued that they Flield not belidliorid. sad tkerefore. their Petitions far enquiry laid so stoking* grittier:for his present motion. Evan admitting the prestige; if the Gentleoneik opposite. be could not see the jouneworthoer conclusion. If the allegations of the Petitieners wi re as hike as they were conte nded to be, he aid) thoug h t bisirros-st nimbi% ought to be entert ained, in order to have them diaprosed,o,4l en show to the country that the Ministers, in the erierck °FAB le,straordinaiy p Avers entrusted to then, bad proceeded sins itnairccsary . rigour, or acted eiiirrary to the authoslty of law. Web:Abet" told that Francis Ward,w hose petijion hejiad a u ou the ground of his motion, was a bad character, and, lbw: fuse. one/unify of the *Heath% of the House: 'Nukes:mild ask on what ground the charge was osivatioed? Hod ti t d o p e any thing which had been proved against him—had hebot Jr convicted ninny armee ? •On the old maxim of Inn,' which he oas -sorry to see • dircounteuturvsl by some kleeMmesg Mouse—El tear !I —every irmiluig,ht to be liresunied eminent I 'he was fuotni to he guilty : and' this person ought there( i.s . be citosidered as honest and credible till he was convkted une `ing the contrary. He would not only rely on this pseud the. cruse, but he a uold ea,v that he had the autlywity or Goieni: roent itself for this man's innocence: . Ile bad been takes spat • Nottingham. immediately after the disturbances whiehakitaad ' the neighbouring districts, and which were made the seteit of legal iavestigaiiun at Herby; and If any thing could have OM ,established against him, ought t,, have been brought to trial, aid , would have been brought to tria l, l ong before this time. HSI 1 ' discharge might therefore be taken as an orpiment for his is tocence. Sot if there were any uhjectiono against Wiurretts: racier, there could be none against that of tae . Pstitiower, tibia . coot bad this night been submitted to the Heinle by his Horn, • ' Girekwedd Primed i Mr. Keough/on), and Ilea cost, with might be referred to the! Committee. Men, however. i nth:Union that the conduct of Ward aas iridefewAhle.. 'hal* could not be pleaded as an ammonia for dein* On idostiee.— Whether be was a good or a bail mna. hit • ease deserved mil I I 'enquired late, ,s l id hr oug ht to lie ideeet,on elts'etteml fooling 1 ,with any other 'alike( till his guilt was proved. He issid la ceived a testimonial of Wor d 's Mil:raster, which he afield reef' 1 to , the Menne.; if it Was necewary; bat he did not rtoundlitir stream) on the Petitioner's character, but On the breach of WO ta•••• ostrich had. berm wade in •his person. lie sboald iiwielote aist trouble the Douse with a n y further o bservations, nut eve. tlade by moving. ** nut.. t:qmpilttei• be appoinied 10 enquire • into she 'mob of the niiespiaieni in die Petition of 1 , rands stard, . and report thereon to thriftiest - v . Lord CASTLEItttiGiI said, he bad not ~.. , , „ A rillogether prepared for toe' .coutse the Noble oataisr hall taken, as he (Lord Castlereagh) had cumepreN .pated to enter into the esse. o ( WIWI as shaSokliesific cmae.on which the - motion would be foended. if i e did not think, however, *bit it would be neteusiy to change the course which he should otherwise** taken. The Noble Mover had divided his speede into two considerations :—the first o( them had rh, fereuce• to the proteedings which, he assumed (iisi truly), would soon be .brought under the goai dessAjoil of the House—a Bill of Indemnity. 09 this subject the Noble Mover bad not allpwnatcpaq . A. in his research. He had said that the precediat Ws Hill of Indemnity had been snide in .1801, by 1l who now demanded it.• On the con trar y , he !If lieved, that in all those cousin which the.Htls9l .Corpus Act had been suspended, and th at Susporear' ' bad beets acted open, it had beeu followed by a Ili of Indemnity. The Bill of Indemnity in 18(11 toss' pretty extensive, for it extended to acts done under all the Suspensions of the Constitution from 1793 tp.lBol. But there had beets three Rills of Indus oily, one in King William's 'Yelps, one in 1715, sod anotlier.in , 1745. He could affirm, that no etati.kail • •-• . • been cbmipitted but upon "oath ; eon's's:ll.ml ad, ea the oath of the person who had.tnade sp tnepiveltes (Olivet,). .In evieitinitance,..mr,•tbe evidence hod been submitted to the La* Officer of the Crolss• But he (Lord Castlereagh) argued the case en the assumption Of a dale ' quite different frow 'those of the Noble Mover. He (Lord Folkestor) had denied die necessity of the measures; but the llouse had recognized that necessity by. a large al lority. It was not by one Committee, but by,:tee both Hr That the and- .cret Committees, in . WWII, • arty bad been established; aed, , whateeer of opinion there had been, the Members of .1M°!1 Contesittees, who were in the habit of diffesietrelor his Alejesty's Goeesuraent, egreed in the far, tb there wes air p r' ,iped Conspiracy for the oliatillov without 'due priceis. . lilos lawyer wield Say that _., was --_ -. .. 7;-.F.P.1 4 "1: - - Ir s egalar ; no one would bike opoo himself lo amett. nun aq Of Q, ur ch an a g ia i e ; b y . - too Com mit t e d for is Ifsoom °Pate could be released without doe process of law, modem it be, by . pardon. As to the reeogui- hem Prirlf - J 18(1415 1 • in pot the'PhYtic°l fortes eft*. tikiug advertise .. ei tie . 'awe of the parties themselvei, it sa an inferior sortuf bail, nal country in acting against the State cod the Corlftito, see of kw warily. It . i; a mode of discharge as illegal on the lion. Ow a. coblrary tistucoptiusi, the argaastill 01 part of the Olken Of the Crown. as it is stsjust to the prisonits, his illegal, heisaile it is diary to. all tae Statutes from Ed. the Noble Meyer - wisrfeuaded. It was aecessfll ward L•• and oitimit heeliur it 'Vie" the limits with a atilt , certainly, 11131 titut4 the Sespenvion Act, ail tho on their characters, *Web . . if they bad been tried, would most probably set have Ruag f,,,d I „ thew. The g ist & ar o „ ol io, Sabsteutial. for** of justice should be adhered to i. /o wed was ;bat of .oo $4 ~ or Edward I. couuniraly balled the. bat, would it be contended that individealsosO ° 6. 14 d. litailtS. ol . Weiiiiinstee. Thi g Act 'went to rePlevilwi th e onl y i given information, ender: tblo %pros. its. Abaft t "' l sort iirasil tworin at Awl dinei andfrosi thisit fr was argued in friar of die. powet el it itthretary of ease to commit, that abr. shot 114•1 0 04 be prodsced in i Coen of Lee -- W tomt power which the Klost.fitturrilP l Mtwed hailleair.trattitrred: who bad given intermation, being seised with cone to the Secretary of Mete. A •Magiitrale could nest ball is tom, ! .• where b e eould sot earns;. Byshaaltabste of lebillis and glary, Pikar.tue, aud.desire to peeves! the . elect a dine a ataateeste could oot slivebergy. a row; utwooiaii record.: which•they had contributed is ertavrt, bat witt idlll, sow. iftlavesdua t oostlotrterKi,llreAtrlr'"-1311 d'sfrOl.. 601 with to he made the instreeteuts for ilosecoultd" Wild, that In this dirievireit ha 4 on the *whom, . „ .. , if the Goartef. IfAng's'llasidt. , ll4 Swag of adt #oetrise ihollila-1 f ru ' P ° 9 4h i r 4 their osoodolos'" twoold i t l e i g t e gbtostiocoold W1(014110 Treeloo.foctie prisoners hatappeare : ed that they should, in violation of good faith, be lo ° ' ed beforedsat Coati where dieli recogidssutere diseliargedeunil .o •0 AV sae • pro the legality of entering two Ore had thus been ockoowledged. • duCodi (:Dort . 1' I lit t • tea these per To this be could mot &strut ; nu lubseciuctit at; of the priauatra 11l ai, Ind to pratett the Fecrettry vitiiitto •••" (11 ttl. ... , .. •• • . • . • . . ... ...._ • • -.- .. . _ :; - • 4- . -?, -.. . • . _ . , .... . . . ~ i . _ . :. ..._. .#.O. kJ.. . . . - 5 ) ... - -• „'. ~,.. • t0....-...:._ _ - .. ~ .... .. .. • ~,..._ .. • N. . •• ( • . . . i .. • • . . ...........„, . ~ • . i. ". • .; • 1 . • :,, 4 - . . . l -' • ' r ' ' •-• • THE S'I'A'rESMAN. . . , ; • .., . • • .. _ -- -- - - • ._ .x . ..._, ~i ngs of Pant _ ~ t .•. . : .., ao t e w o n sit e k t s p r re ex u y l retzpect id ' to e be etfec ite t zu s w or i s ig to c i:e in ot f: r kcal • Mr. BROUGIIAM ,eoucurreti entirely %its, go. onsiiirsom spin°. ti , rut ke —ise Dorsi opinion which facts had so irresistibly impair 1011 . suditog..4.hi ; ;L.:. .. luta! 04, t 7 . , 5 ,,..,.... lance of a Bill Of . a ~ . i , „ p ,'w w I . .0 am att i ag that t agistr had the pokier idolhaiii oil, that it was -impouiblo longer to dopy to viral ihndtatlee . 01 • iihe i!'!" •• ohnitei. . i i On " :i v . 1 "II of the reign o f 47 • . f i t !Treason, they did not that power sic Lig, for is the case of the pre -Goers, one Magistrate Kid takes i ; t• chased proper -to - , "Id tig• administratioo of justice to this four Northern C;O4P. *424 .11* might . .sis a si_itpos ive f t . ... recognisance% io slime immures, whereas ay she Act of Paiiip a DOI to the Hoboes CO , US, ;tad Mary, she prtroce of two was required for the persic a . ties. He was vouch gratified to find that tha only ob- -Houk it night bil a could ersble unpromising of Ibis 'islet's. f _-- •- .4 amor- ante of the ditty.. l'heie fersoos, therefore, mold mot lividly jeetion was to the mods in which the remedy was to' .f.,or_charntee, tigg,ll6-e-olitioHiar lad _ __ _ have bees baited ; for if it was regular now ..._ _-..112....1 ILL areaulkulli Uriesti his Hon. and Learned wards of dm, fulfil I.o4MOctor 4 Amikell'l l ri i...' rail * . - __ _--- ...s sateseSiqFP ...JR- ~.• .....,....... of th. 'uweill... ""'Y t"'"" —•-- oleo Act. as that Act did not wake any cliairol a t i clr i" : tto s nored! them. '.[kis_wc_s_ itald_iiif,_,AlrliotArs!maitswat_fir..4.l.l=.L.i.wmid h.....,i I. - - . _„~. - . • - -