The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-03-17 00:00:00

TITE STATtqMAN. stand where ettramwesere. All who approved the they were tbeeefote disinclined to ,eequiesce in the Catholic Claims, were eitherstireetly..or by inference, communication fur the Pope.-13uftlie House would accused of bigotry. He would however say, that there bear in mind, that two important documents had since was little reason to suppose, that the Catholics, if been received fees liewistv to which the Roman Cativo their prayer were granted, would not return to their lie prelates had given their unqualified assent. 1815, di e former oppressive and intolerant doctrines. Let the rescript of Cardinal Litta, dated April 25, Protestant Dissenter be first raised to his proper rank not meet with the slightest opp osition ; and that west Th d in the State; and then it would be time enough to to sanction such an arrangement as the present ; and consider what ought to be done for the Catholic the letter addressed by Pius VII. to the Roman Catho- Dissenter. If the Protestant Dissenter was not be at- lies of Ireland, was received with the sate spirit. tended to, why was the Catholic to he relieved front Hut the Right Hon. Gentleman in hit arguments re the test laws ? It was necessary that the House should ferred to a period before either of these communica consider this before they went further. The Bill passed, Lions reached Ireland. If the Right lion. Gentleman they could not then pause—that on u Web they de- admitted the latter proposition, what became of his sided, must remain fur ever. former argument, wherein lie said that the Roman Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH contended, that the Catholics of Ireland disobeyed the injunctions of a Petition did not speak the sentiments of the great body foreign Patriarch ? It was very true that the Roman •of the Catholics of Staffordshire. It was described as Catholics were not content with the ipsrc di.rit of coining from the Catholic Clergy and Laity of that Qitarantotti ; but when they hail received insmtructi itted,ons county. But who were the great names compr ehended in front higher authority, they immedi sub that body? Ile would ask, whether no consideration and bad not said a word in opposition for the last was to he made the absence oft he name the Earl ACCell vears.—(llear,felt it but justice to of Shrewslotry for ? Was Lord Turtim's statue worthy of the Roman Catholic ' el -id state these facts to the nu consideration? Where were the Clifforils—llse der- I loose. nynglsatio—the Blunts—the Fitzherberts ?He would .I r. PEEL explained. ask whether they were out to eionsipler th , it exception Sir J. NEW PO Wl' said, that the Pope had dis as decisive against unanimity ? These were the natitral owingl the rescript of Qstarantsitti. leaders of thol'atholies, and they slid not join the objec- A3l EMBER, whose name we could not learn, 531 1 1 tions made by the petitioners. Ile understood that, that the Ronson Catholics of Ireland might have felt besides the Clergy there was not the name sit ' any one a soreness in agreeing to the rescript sit Quoratitutti, Vatlsolic of distinction affixed to the petition. It hail after the Rill hail been rejected. only been the work of Dr. Inkier, the irreeoncileahle 'I he petition was ordered to be printed. enemy to all union. No wonder, being an enemy to 3lr. COKE presented a petition signed by fifty o ft union and concord, that his present exertions should the Clergy of Norwich, its support of the Catholic be hailed by Protestants who were influenced by the claints.—(llear,liear.)—lle concurred must cordially same !noires and dispositions. It Was intiloSsitth . to in the prayer of the petition, yet he felt that any expert that any arrangement could he made to :;ire tiling he could say would be supeilluous after the satisfactitM to Dr. 31ilner, or to the Honourable 31eits- manner :n which the question had been brought for her for Somerset, who stated his regret that the penal ward by this Right Ilip:sourable 31eitilter for the I 'lli laws against the Catholics should have been repealed. verity of Dublin. The splendid talents of that Sir T. I. ETH BR IVG E said, that if he had used Right Ili:moo able 31eitilter were wordsily eolith's ell the expressions attributed to him by the Hon. 31enther, upon the occasion. Ile felt proud and delighted at he had done sip unintentionally, but to the best of his the retlectiou, that in presenting this petition, lie recollection he did not use them.—(Hear.) was doing an art which woold atheil the higlici-t Mr. ELLIS (of Dublin) after what had been said pleasure to t h at excellent 'prelate, the Bishop of Nor respecting Dr. Milner, wished to call the attention of wick, whose life lia.l hero devoted to the cans.. of civil the Ilouse to some liesolut• agreed to by the Irish a nd religious liberty, and alto had mode every exer- Catholic Bishops at Dublin, in the year It slo . The thin in support of the present useasttre.--(Cheers.) Itesolntions expressed their thanks to the Rev. Doctor 3lr. WIMP:II4ft SE was anxious to say a few fit his exertions iu the Catholic cause as their avowed words, as he hail had the honour of presenting . to the agent. !loose a petition, signed by .220 clergymen, against 31r. WYNNE said that the Roman Catholics of Ire- the Catholic claims. llt• regretted that the word land were not to be held responsible for the altered bigotry had heel' used on either side, and he wishes! opinions of Dr. 31ilner. that the ilisetis.ion should he carried o n in th e salve 31r. ELLIS said that the ResoLitions had been spirit of liberality with is Iti: Ip it had commenced. repeated in effect, twice since the year I a 10, particu- The petition was laid on Ilie table and ordered to lady in the year ItSl3. be printed. Mr. WARNE wished that whets the lion. Member Lord P.II.3IERSTON presented a Petition frosts the told of what had been done and said by Dr. Milner in Unit ersiie of Canibripless aeain•t any further conces- I t.lO and 1!..113, that he would also state what he shoos to the Roman C:illpulics. The Petition start Lad said in 11.440. At that period 3lr. Ponsonby that the opinions of the Roman Catholics were still read a letter in that House from Dr. Sinner, consent- unaltered, and that their admission to political power ing to similar arrangements which were then proposed. m o uld h e a ttended with the most dangerous consequen -31 r. WI1.11EI1FOR(•E explained its so low a tune CeS. 76e Noble Lord expressed Isis entire dissent frosts of voice as to be inaudible its the rallerv. the prayer 01 the Petition. He dial not feel the saute Sir. PEEL was anxious that the House %boob] under- alarm as the vetitiotter•, at emit etlint; the claims of stand the real facts of the case. They would immeili- Isis Catholic f,.ll ow . bu hi e et, ; a m i d h e t.l ately see that the object of his lion. Friend (11r. Ellis), • , 1 . at the day tot tile final •1 1 1) 11 sl Ille I to 010 4 e elili Ills, ley having the was not to involve the Roman Catholics :is a body in the Dr. Milner; but to .hew that antra Royal assent given to the pr e se nt Bills , wo uld be one same opinions with •intilar Hill to the present had been introdur,4l, and a of the most atispicimis that had everilawned Nom Egg smsilor ecclesiastical arrangement proposed, the. R o man laud.---(tbeers.)—lle regretted to be obliged to differ 4 athoite Bishops of Ireland deprecated it in positive from those to whops he owed the !tontine of his seat in as tending to injure the interests of their reli- that House, vet his dissent would at least be consider ,.ion.—(Hear, hear I)—The Bight Hon. Aligning- here , et a proo f of hi s sineeri.y. He was bound, however, rea.i a Resolution Dossed by the Irish Catholic Bishops ~n t h e ow', M ay. 1-13, g their decided w 'w. , to say, that the opinion from which he differed was cu .:film to the securities provilled by the Bill „ isis in tertainrd by the majority of those who had attende. l that year had been introduced, and stating: th a t they the meeting. •cottla not agree to those securities oithont incurring the Mr. 5A11"111 said, that a great proportion of the guilt of sehism. i meeting objected to the petition. Those who hail sup- Sir J 1. " .• RIDLEY said. that unit of every " Vent" mated it formed a distinct class, and there were litany t'.ve u.smes that appeared to the petition. at 'lea , ' 11% . who were decidedly ',loused to it. Ile repeated that seemed to have been written by the s. •It Sir It. PA RS F.LL observed, that the Roman Catholic the l'etitinn was far from bring nlianininn%lY agreed Vishops of Ireland, thought they wou ld have • to, at this- same time he looped *hat no discussion guilty of schism, hall they agreed to the Bill of P. 13. might take place on this or any other Petitions, which ohmic first having tommunication with the Pope. Ile' would trod to alter that tone of forbearance and good understood that the woribs introduced into the Rill, ,: temper with a Well this great question bad been hi would go to alter and street the disciplinesif the Church:: then.) treated in this House, and with which be hoped and tilts they het.' to he schism, unless it Was saurtiunetl I'v the it ttttt 411 Pontiff. But as the Court of Rome had !it would he carried on to its cistielnaiiiii.--(Hear.) — i ., rsre d i i„. Bill, t h ere cou ld l ie no i i „.,„4. 4 ".„ c y i n The petition was then read, and ordered to he printed. t! e Prelates of Ireland acquiescing in one of a Attsilar Lord E. SOil F.RSET presented a Petition from the estore.—(llear. hear')—lre deprecated the dissensions Clergy of Stow, in Gloucestershire, against the Ilia wbirh lusd Owes place in 1,413, and lie hoped they would for reiniivin. , Catholic disabilities.—Ordered to be rover igain occur. A great change had manifested it self all over I relauil with respect to this question, in p: col of it Rich he would beg leave to read to the House :A letter which he hail reet•ived from a most respectable gentleman in that country, who had ronaideroble iu lpoeuic with the Roman Catholic body, and had the best 'opportunities of forming, a correct estimate of their LTlte Hon. Baronet here read the letter, which stated that a lively sensation hail been excited among t: e Roman Catholics of Ireland, in ronsequence of the rwasure proposed by 3lr. which gave general "tatisfaction.] '!'his letter was entitled to iwenliar at `tention treat the character of the iudividual by whom it becti written. Mr. PEEL explained, and referred to the opinion of Co, Itons.in Catholic Prelates as hostile to the measure nett after they had received rescript front Rome sigited -is the Vice l'refect of the Propaganda. 'I hey hail in any, I $l4, after they had been put in possession tot . it* document in question, requested Lord Doming! re sad Mr. Ur.ettan to nine that the clauses respecting tl.e securities should be expunged irons the Bill, as ad . Ism to the principles of their religion. . Dr. PIIILLI3IOHE made some observations against tt s principle of the petition, and said the signature. did not include any one name of distinction among the respectable Roman Catholic families of Stafford -10. Sir 11. PARN ELL explained, and the petition was ti.en ordered to lie on Ilse table. Lord PALM ERS moved that Ilse petition be :printed. -Sir. DAWSON wished to ask an lion. Baronet (Sir "11.-Psthell.) it' the House was to consider that the I.•r he had read, expressed the coneurreoce of the ,man Catholics of Ireland its the present measure ? Sir li. PARNELL sail, he had read the letter as coming- from a private individual...slit-value; Isis opinion 'se a•pnblic question, without itsaisitq any pledge ii ith r. spect• to It. Sir J. MACKINTOSH was anxious to state a fart with Aida the • Right Hots. (gutless an opposite (Sir. Peel) seemed on:milli:tinted. The Right lists. Gentle l` aft supposed, that beranse the l'adsolies !111 . a:cCde to the diere ..st of Si. Quaratitotti in Is i I printed. Mr. CB ANT presented a petition from the Bo man Catholic merchants in the town of Iktheay in fa rain of the Bill for removing Roman I '.itholic disabi lities.--Ordered to hr printed. Sir r. pre.,ented a prtition against the Bill, but the Clerk read it in so low a tone, that we could not hear the name of the place from whence it came. 31r. 31. PI : 7.(iE1t.11.1) presented a petition in fa vour of the Bill from the Roman l'atholies of Traler. —Ordered to lu• printed. ROM t 1 . ATI101.11:8 RILL. Alt. intended to trespass upon the time if the House, but a very short time indeed. Ile had but lull lately rcperienred a very ample portion of the kind less of the House. to ent!age notch of its attention upon 'he present occasion. His object was merely to put the House in possession of the outline, and not the detail of the Bill, which be had the honour to introduce. When he first took the liberty of declaring his opinions to the House, hr stated that he brought forward the •-- - measure with one primary object, that of doing a great piddle good. And although he then disavowed the in fluence of any motives regarding the irritation which prevailed in the country. yet he did express a hope, that if the measure was a just one, as he believed it to be. that imiaediate satisfaction to the toiletry would he to effect produced. He had the errairst pleasnre in stating, that since the resolution which the Honee had come to :.n that nee-lesion. the expeetAtions in which he then ventured to indulge, had been more than realized. The effect of thAt resolution upon the rountry haul far exceeded Isis most smignine hope. lint those would dill him the greatest injustice who thought that he bar ! 1.....re.1 the cl • -viral idea of giving satisfaction to all t•Jrtivg. Thrre were indeed some persons with f.e would not attempt studs a thing. inasmuch as l ie {Mete that 10 he wa‘ Ole ate %test stikery law:l3.)—To thow lie shut nut wish 'to :0- sire• 4 itiza•rif, as lie 1%;;,4 aware that ttr:: l l.netli wool I 111•1 er convince them. tt.l it the 111e:841W I. prs/11.6!,•11 acre 41Iried to hiury u'nti'l ell is k, i sed 47 it it tire rejck•!ett t.er. (.1 1ati . 411.1 tie- . ' . Hos. Member, preeated what bad been said by an ing him with having applied the charge of bigotry to those who opposed the present measure. Ile never could have used the epithet,for, than such aline of condect or of argument, nothing was more foreign from his heart. The party who opposed lam, he considered to have an undoubted right to his utmost re spect and deference. The opinions which he himself cherished must be his errors ; and no man in the universe was more ready to yield them, if he could be convinced of their fallacy. For him self, and in behalf of his Friends, it was necessary to declare that they had proceeded in all transactions connected with the measure, with the greatest defer ence to all Protestant communications, giving free ac cess to all argument which might be offered upon the subject. They had recurred to the sufferings of the Roman Catholic—they had recurred to the feelings of the Protestants ; always keeping in mind that nothing Should he yielded which would .continue the one, and nothing asked that might he inconsistent with the other. The state of the public mind in Iceland spelt the prncress solar!, the measure had made was must gratifying. The pulolic mind in England, according to the Honourable Menolter for Somerset, was in a state of apathy. But that which he so called apathy, was %dist he (Mr. Plunkett) called a disposition to lease' the ease in the bands of Parliament as its mos t na t ura l anal its !lest jutlges,and not disturb its deliberations by unnecessary clamour. He should now proceed to one of the exact provisions of the Bill. Before doing see however, he wished to see himself right in the opinion of die House upon what fell from him u p on a previous swrasion. Ile dial assert that the franchises and offi cers of the State the free right of every Roman Catholic liege subject of the r e alm. Ile now re asserted, that in the same sense as a Protestant claimed that eligiloilitv, so alto did the Roman Ca tholic. Ent he said nothing was so alosturd as that these rights were not liable to be r;.strirtiel or rote t relied i fatly I•!Ciirilirory or necessity of the State sl 1.1 call for it. I any just cause COllll.l - why they 'meta not to etajoy those rights, then the Roman Ca tLolir yield. lint he did say, and hr wii s • peat, that the natural rich' vetoed as 15,01 Is in th. .111 C as in the other. He bregeil tat ask. wit re the Pro.estant fouuded his claim to the right of for a 31entioec of l'arliament, or of sitting in p arlia a.t.to t himself c %V here was it written Ile I: ii.• not %Ottee hr would find it, male in the saute sour' , which also gave it to the Roman l mitotic : It smelt . the essence. the elements, the stamin t of the Como tution. All the differ e nce between the !men ' , .stli. was this :—the Roman Catholic, by the Art Charles li. had been excloaleal from the enjavnient of those rights. Anal did lie deny the authority he said that temporary eiremitstances of danger ren dered it necessary. ; floe Monarch upon the Throne was suspected of Catholicism, and the acts were lie. cessary as a defence. Ent these dangers were now passed away. 'There was nn %everted Monarch upon the Throne. The Protestant religion was firmly es tablished ; and those restrictions ought in justice to cease. Now, if he was told that the dancer had not passed over, lie must meet those who asserted it fairly upon the tittesti.et. nod that hr was always reedy to do. But if any one should say that there was a spirit of exclusion in the Act of Charles PKtentlitsz in its operation beyond the cirenuistances which he had described, then he would challenge them to the best records of our Cowatitution for the proof Ile deniealthat this measure would itivoolve the quest• of the Protestant Dissenters. The two questions must always stand separately and of their own merits. If time Roman Catholic claims were strong, and he cotti,l show that there was no danger iu adon;tting them, the:, they ought to be granted; and it was upon these grounds that he argued fur their admission. But what load that to do with the claims of the dissenters If they had the same claims, and they could prove tile saute absence sada:wee in granting them, then let that question he brought forward. Ile had Isis opinion upon it, and when necessary be should be ready to declare it. lint be was not to be seduced into any expression of that opinion upon the present occasion. Perhaps the House would permit him to explain the state of the Dissenters in Ireland. The Irish Dissenter was not at this moment subject to any Corporation or est Act, nor had he been so fir the tam. 4th years. In 17.50 an Art was passed by which the Protestant Dis %Niter in Ireland was freed from taking the Sacramental Test. The words of that Art were as precise anal expli tit as they could possibly be. It stated, " The Protes tant Dissenter shall not he subject to the Sacramental Test." In 1;93, an Act was passes{ by u bids the Roman t' a oholie ass declared subject to no other qualification than the Dissenter was liable to. The consequence, as one would naturally suppose, then was, that both IMO relieved fr the Sacramental Test. But then it was assunstal that the Act of I;3U applied to the Protestant IN..rifler, and not to t tie Dissenter of any other descrip thin. An Art was then introduced into the Irish Par liament explaining the Act of 1710, and making the for• met. Art embrare both classes of Dissenters. l'he ro l e li e l e l l isowever. name finally rejected. He should now pro c e e d to the i 000000 eoliate injects of the Rill. It comprised two aliesinso ohjeetsr- That of the circumstances which went' against the doctrine of transubstantiation, and ilea of the question of the Oath of Supremacy. Respecting the former, he need not take np much of the time of the Howie upon that subject. Ile never yet beard of any perste% who emote:a:led for the necessity of that declara to. : and he believed it was. neither required for the purposes of religion, nor of christianity. HS e matted col, also, that it was utterly imperfect as a security. It was competent for a lIIITSOII tll-11101TOW to take the oaths whiels were intended to exelnole him from Parliament, !lien enter the Howe., awl declare that he was a Papist. He wonlol then pass to that part of the Rill which re listed to the oath of supremacy. And he must own that hr hail Isere struck with soave surprise when a Right Reverend Hewlett's') had taken upon himself to say. that the oath, us given its the Bill, was inconsistent with ' the humus Catholic relieion.—:le was justified in ssy j ug ., that the laws exact ding the See of Rome from in terference with English affairs, were previous to the Re formation : anal it thereto re was absurd to imagine there was any thine its the Catholic Religion incompatible with the heat security of the. State. 'ln support of this pretilitei the Right lion. Member referred to the wonts of exreption in Ilse Statute of Philip 11011 Mary. Th- Art of Elizabeth followed, which eel:minded the nails reistired by the preceding acts, and sled:L 1:d that " It meant nothing but what was of right due to her Majesty's :Coble Father, Bing Henry th and to King Edward the Si stlo, her lonelier." This explanation was as obvious as tss-able. 11e load also the authority of Bishop llor. n.l on this subject. who, in speaking of this explana lei v art hot observed •• Th it the moderation of the vernment ie this respect was evident, for the shi sh of these oaths was not to entrap men, bet a , e that which was required of them appar e nt t: „, understanding." This authority Burnet `l7 explain the policy of Elizabeth with respect to th question, In n : a n ne f bie nrt m he e r in s b o r t r ipa re lt rr o ,d f i tio i etza i it ii .f. th lialha. hk Articles of the Established Church, which a,•t aty l that the King's Majesty hall t! I f as hr hostel _ai• ra.e. Power, e tc h, • siastical as well as civil, within the 1 These,not a d t o h u e g n h i t g n h o t t H t t o ) o b i n e u s r u a l h o le e r t ;Memberl any foreign sioinaftept:tete: ert, mwelandt:".. rea and try Power. the terms of the articles of our o • r Church, and it sorely was tote ilittele at the preolit day to put an interpretation upon th em un fi vottraw to the Roman Catholics. Having thus, present o ase the laws, tar lir ve ll Ot i t t' ld tY t s i a o l u i t sij o e f d thee e i i t i t o% s e v i l l e . ieh lb t . ise had eoc l p tp l 7, :etin r o rit .r o t t i f the oath iitimiit t i v t asa:. to alter the form of the Bill as it originally stoat and to substitute words which world rerhe present oaths of allegiance and supremacy, 4.d t h at the Roman Catholics were ready to tak e t h ey oaths, but that they felt ecru*s as to wastk er i t might not he understood that those words denied the spiritual authority of the Pop?. The dame deh ot o then go on to state the explanatory words. at I , ut lee proposed to go into the Cotnenittee, am! if it sleeeldt be found that any better mode of expresiies tog4 r lle ci; adopted he would be happy to support it ; but e n . treated the !louse not to loo's at this questi o n w i t h the eyes of metaphysicians, of easaists. of citi but to apply to it their good youstitutienal cowmen sense.—(Hear, hear.)—ln the hope that they would do so, lie would go into the Committee with a rout. donee that the object which he trusted was desired ley all, would he accomplislieti. Ile now ranee to tits enacting part of the Bill. Originally he La intr..- 'laced words declaring that the LIW propose 1 to lore. taxed should be abrogated ; lint le • had cut o u t these words and insert.r others, whirl h. , hoped . it ht „ s found more conciliatory. The tid•xt dance stated that no other Oath sl Id be taken that the foliose-leg Hoes went on to state the oath. Ile propewil ta • substitute another form, but he wo;.1,1 jut make a few observatioNs upon the present law, as it -effected Boman Catholics, with respect to the inlietit once of lauded property : They were originally shat 'ut under the term Papists ; hut eerie at the resod time, the taking . of any oath, was not necessary to the acquiring of land. lie would rather abolish all di.- tiactiona of oaths ; but at present he must he contest with the explanation of time meth required. Ile was not ,ireparell to say, that every Boman Catholic usual adopt the proposed explanation, for there were smile who probably wunki not. Then they might complain, that the present Dill, so far front being relief, was comparatively, an additional dillitilty; bet he had formed the clause so as to steer clear, if pat• Bible, from all objection, and he had frame.; it that; —Every person desirous of taliing the oath, theisil 'appear before the proper Officer of the 'out of Justin. England, Ireland, anal Scotland. and then in opts Court should take and sulnwrihe the ishitina oath. amid that it should be lawful for every person au taker the oath, to require the officer to read the explaidaridds proposed by the Bill, which v.:planation the ,)hisser should h • required to read at the time of tiliillt the oath. This clause he trusted would in all reverts Ile satisfactory. The oath would lw taken melee the old law, and the explanation would he no part of the (Ilear)--but the officer was required to give the ratite nation at the time. The clause then went on to as that no ei ther oath should be required. Th e Hon. leisslier then referred to flee (lath of :1 Ilel.iode taken in Ireland. He thought there should be now •pa ration of oaths : hut if it even. denied by the Pt testaeir that the oath should he taken, the Catholic., Id• emu-rived, would not object to take it, tl 11 it ar conceived somewhat of an affront to desire it. Its this subject also he would with pleasure reeeili• the suggestion a of any Honourable Member. illyit;gte• plaineel the Oath of Supremacy, It" arrived at the ).'horses of Et volition. The principal eta., that %%hid lc • went to disable a Homan Catholic from holding the Office of Lord High t•haecellor, Lord Contaii , sidiert. or other great olliee utecitionial in the Act. He thietehl the Exception ought not to be carried any farther. !T -rance as all eminent offices were in the gift o f Crown, it was obvious that the Crown had the weans of being satisfied of the loyalty and integrity. :,5 biw " . . 1 as the ability of every Catholic, before giiido_ any appointment of trust. Ile was aware, Itearee:e that he should here he opposed by a Right lb.n. Ken her, of whom lie never could speak but in terms of the most perfect respect. Ile ettetiervood that that Hight Honourable Person wished to carry the roll time farther, and to present KOlll3ll Catholics sil ting on the liench.—[Hers Sir William Scot'. to %el the Right Honourable Member atqwared to address himself, bowed assent.] -11e regrew., it, because if these distinctions :mil kaki:J.:es ever kept up, little or no real amid would he feared ;lank from the present !erasure. Ms now came to tie second branch eif the subject Audi , d 1 to th laws relating to the intercourse of English inii.i.%•• with the See of 'tome. This interiainrse had twee t rind on few spiritnal purposes for itta ty years , lei s pally on the aitpuintmetit of Roman Catholic t'ethi ' er: " Tie' well the approbation of the Bishop lay l• ! . the Pope, he did not pra cticall y a pp •iiot •. • Bishops ; 11311Zur the itlielYt.ll in questium t; As merely theoretical, be rS a theoretical ratieily wound be sitlficiett; to ri it. Ile would however say a few refa . l " r Y words opott the ilso.:e a rr,ioltititt, the nitho . :7 . Their were three titevies. 'I he lit st et an 3101 00 : ,meat liv the Ilishni.s te, till up the vacancy. scud mi., by tide Dean and l'aapter; and the thirt IF . 1e re .le611:411A. ; lint all tilt"' 1114 11. '" "'r e l° , 11 ": I exelusigiti id' the P.ope, who exercised no flthitAo right ten this !mlojert. 11)em this head lie: s hould lb.: . side an oath, dvelaritv.r, that the person w ho te i a that tea f, denied all right hum any foreign power o v e rthrow or eisclateier the 1.11 of the "' . England. Ile sho u ld then eo on to provide the ni.e slay 1* little Irma that whit.), was suggested in prim's!' do of appointing the Dishier. * This mode cliff we al NII the Bill of I el 3. Ily that Bill. it was werwmarY _ all peroons who were appointed by the Crowe le t f, h a r e v t a h c e an u c c y s rur h t o c u ur b e l ohfavichteskreancantl n e t y r ; e i i i • i e tt ssa b ;): "ti" sent Bill he privies:ll, that It •tborthl he 1 : the .be u2lii were taken W a ne the appoildo".9 ...: