The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-02-11 00:00:00

~: , L4W INTELLIGEIVCB. -.-.. me....— COURT OF CHANCERY, Fay. 10. ._., The Le sso CosinessLoa did alt cone is.* C•oft Mph fill Di Wooten Mato *Pea o'clock. Oa Os seat, he ordered snotloss to be hypnotist on, called on the Attorney , 4lesteral to begin, that on hacks , be precedence frons his official sl ot ltt " Ig.l/laligir"h"` " ird, this, I am aware, is the day • nerally des _" "1" ring Term to the hearing of MO. ins, but miff* g i lt day of Term is sow so near, which oar Lordship knows is always a motion day, I hope our Lenishlp will have n o o bj ect i on l e h ear th e re cinder of the argument la the case of eh Attoraey ;rueful in the matter of Catherine-hall, is the Cuiver itv of Cambridge. 'l he LORD CuaNcau.na.---To me, Mr. Hart, it Is a natter of pure indifference which cause now goes on; rot my only reason for exiling the Attorney-tleneral to 'proceed was, that this was a motion-day. I asu (mite willing to hear any gentleman at the Bar who has a pressing It/miens. I think you had as well go on with the Catherine-hall case. Mr. 31 A TTIIEWS, as onior Counsel, then followed Mr. ll'orritenau. is beha lf of the blasters and Fellows of the sew foandation of Catherine-hall. Mr. Harr made au iageteissasitply, anti was proceed ing to make several remarks on the nature of the deed, The Leas Cnastattoa said he was obliged to go elsewhere, and be would with pleasure hear the re mainder of Mr. Hart's reply to-morrow. Meantime he , n ished it to lie observed, dim he would read over the ease of the Attorney-tieneral r. the Corporation of Bristol ; endue hearing Mr. Hart's reply, after reading 'that rase, lie woaW give his judgment, without tail. to morrow. , ills Lordship left the Bench at seven minutes be , fare two. Just befiwe his rising, Sir Within Lewes, the venera hle father of the City, applied to his Lordship, earnestly requesting that some day might be fixed fur the final ilesisino of an appeal from the Court of the Master of ti.e Boils. The sum in iciestion was very large, anal Ile mid earnestly requested his Lordship would take it intweonshieration, considering his (Sir W. Lewes) ad vanced state of life. The Long Coartenitoa.—Sir Watkin Lewes, if there was a wan is the world that my own feelings would lead me to oblige, it would be you, both from your very advanced are and the very consistent line of conduct yen have uniformly followed during your long protract ed life. For this I feel yon entitled to my sincere Pe spect ; bat I cannot sacrifice the cases of 'other appel lants to oblige you. I assure von, my listis quite over charged with them, especially the appeals of Itsl4, since the appointment of Vice-Ctancellor. The l'ourt then adjourned. COURT OF C1131310N PLEAS, ri:11. W. On Wednesday, Thomas Peke, Esq. Barrister, wax called to the degree of nerjeant at LAW, and took his seat iu Conrtocsoedi In a use of Halford - r. Dillon, after hearing 3lr. Ser. Jeant Urfa and Mr. Sorjeant lit.osaa•ri for the plain: tit and Air. Dillon himself in reply, the Court postponed their judgment till the next 'fcrw. STEWARD C. LOMDS AND orrigic This was a cause tried before Lord Chief Justice Dallas at the last Asaises for the county of Norfu:l:, and .he following appeared to be the facts of the case, as iliscloeed upon the trial : A Mr. Burgess was the owner of lands and a mill erected thereon, situate at Hemlinell, in the county of Norfolk, anti having borrowed the suns of 1.095/. from the plaintiff, be secured the repayment of it by a mort vire upon the premises, the condition of which was to hr void upon payment of that eons, with interest, on the tills of June, 1818; the money, however, was not repaid, and the plaintiff therefore became the owner, Burgess still continuing in. the actual possession. Burgess had contracted a debt with a person moaned Wright, who, having brought an action and obtained a verdict, issued writ offirri facies, directed to the defendant Jambe, the High Sheriff of Norfolk, who sold the pill under that writ. The present action was brought to recover a compensation iu damages for the mill, which had been taken down and carried sway immediately after the sale. Notice had beam given to the Sheriff that the mill ore the property of the plaintiff. The Jury found a verdict fir the plaiutiff, damages 27W., with liberty for the de fig:dant to move to enter a nonsuit on the following' points :—First, that the mill was nut a fixture; um: sue. cottilly, that it was, at the time of the execution, it the ...gnat possession of Burgess, and therefore that the dere ' Alio ymil. r. Serjeant BLO/lETT load, on a tomer play, obtained a rule to show cause why this verdietehould nut be set • aside, and a nonsuit entered. Mr. Serieant FRIMIUS DOlrightlled cause, and contend -191, first, that the mill was a fixture, and passed with the , freehold; an.l second/y, that the occopation of the mill by Burgess was rut inconsistent with the deed, and that t actual possession by the plaintilfiras nut necessary. He cited the case of kidd r. Rawliuson, 2 Bosanquett and roller 59, where it was held that a hill of sale executed by the Sheriff to a buyer, gave a title without actual possession, and Horn r. Raker, 9 Fast's Reports, 215, to thew that fixtures would nut pass under the words ; •' goods and chattels." A conveyance passing land, would pass a building on the land, and, therefore, with out the litigation of the mill, it would have passed by the deed ; and surely there was no Wilding whatever morel .f the nature of a fixture than a winilunill, from the very Areamegaticeuf its being exposed to the greatest force of - lie elements. Sorely his Learned Friend could not at- i tempt to argue that it was the disposition of such a • Itivibling to migrate, and that it was therefore a person- •lity as bring of a wandering roving nature. He con tended that the ., plaintiff should maintain his verdict both im•law and justice. Mr. Serjeant Btosserr, in support of his rule, ob served, that this must nut he considered as an :amulete bargain and sale, fur, by the conditions of the tired, the mortgage was to be void; the money should be paid by 4 certain day, in which case there was to be a re-assign- ment of the property. lie contended, that on the trial he hail fully proved the mill was chattel only; and his Learned Friend could not possibly say that a bargain and sale, by way of pledge, of a persouility, without de livery of possession, could stop tfie creditor of the pled,;er from his lawful execution. .4 man may take a .Lease of personal hattels, and they will not be liable to relation against the lessee for the original proprietor. 'l4lWarils. e. Hirben, 2 Tenn tßeports, 587, that the pose •sessitto must follow the devil, and it must be stronger to the case of a pledge than im i that of a bargain end sale. He was aware that in 11uat case it was determined that where the conveyance *as absolute. the possession must be delivered immediately, anti that where it is cadi tional it would not he rendered void by the veuder's con tinuing in possession till the condition he performed. Net this did - nut destroy the former part of the division. 11 a etaitl, that - the question ante the mill being tixttire was a queetion as emelt of law as of fact; and I whether it passed with the load osier the mortgage Or not. la the essaveysmise if Oho Mari the mill was &- smelled as beiag simatod em the lead. and it was there-, hn dearly istaashml in tio r pas that as well as the lead.— It was said that Om agee kid not takes:possession, awl Oat "Flutist it the tie would Bet fellow the deed ; betilde wan not a raw like that is which a chattel coati be tvaasfeered from bead to hand, and the facts in this particular misht sue the strung intermit, of the law. The case id Eilwanis r. ilarben was dissented from in the case of Kidd e. Itawlinson, independently of which it Night be distinguished from the prevent. If the ems gide. *ere absolute there mist hare been an curry. but if act se. the want of it woad nut vitiate the decd.— /Jurgen, by continulag in possession, did aot gain credit from the world on that account, for every one looked upon the land and mill as one entire estate; and know ing he was divested of the land, they could not, they did not imagine him to be more this the were occupier of the mill. The case of Horne e, Baker was import ant. for in that J. Horne, the plaintiff's testatoe, bad left the haakrupt in possession, by which means the world have been deceived, and the things which the lessee held were in that cue moveables. Tile case of Kidd v. Raw- Kneen had been since recognized in that of Watkins e. Birch, 4 Taunt. 1523; and Loth on the facts and the law of the case the Court felt it their duty to discharge the rule.—The plaintiff, therefore, retains his verdict. ARWIES tOURT.DOCTOILS' C031310N, FEE. 10. 741/LEE" OF MARRIAGE. •)lITO, A LOIATIC (IT ills COAIIIITTKE), •. KVIAIA. FALAILT CA1.113113 lISISELIP 11111111. _ Mr. SWANKY, Proctor for the Committee of the Luna tic, anoouneed, that costs and alimony had been paid, in obedience to the decree of the Court ; and hr exhibited prosy of his party, which declared they would primed no further in the cause. ' Mr. TOLLICR, Proctor for Mrs. Smith, applied to cor rect the sentence of the Court ; requesting that his party ',tight he permitted to establish the fart denied by the other side, as to the validity of the marriage, and the sanity of the husband, in opposition to the snit of nul lity, triiii.li was bronglit oil the gro ttttt l of his being de clared a 4 lunatic; and it kWh was now abandoned by the C 11111 l nittee. Ile did not desire thin further i•videnesi *hold be gone into fur the suite's defence, lint that the Court %mild proceed upon the evideure already proilitril , for her defence, in order to affirm the valiiiity of the marriage to all intents and purposes; and by an affirma tive sentence to that effect. SirclostiN Nicallol. demanded if any prece.lent was to he found, in a cause of nullity of marriage, ii here the Court was called upon to pronounce an aliirmatii c %ell tracv fur the validity of that marriaer, at the snit of the defendant, where the party pr dug the twist• di-dared they %mould proceed nu further? lir. .1,14N101.11i t.'iouiewl for Mrs. Smith, answered, that the opal amuse had hero to dismiss the parries from archer tilisetatanie of jtistice. This, hones er, was' I'v • different; and altogether a special case ; for this wa asat ) a question respeeting the validity of this marriage, which as directed by tfie Court of Chancery. in order to satisfy the Master, fur the purpose of itaiLitig his re port relative to a Chamery suit now peuding between dm parties; it was, in fart, a suit of jorlitat i ea. Ti. i issue directed was to try the validity of the marriage upon the sanity or insanity of the party, tie Committee of the husband denying ?fie validity of the marriage. on the ground of hi* insanity. Now, in easier:- to MI, plea, the wife propounded an allegation the the mew' riage was little contracted by a 'minion in newel mint Sir Jotis Ntriool,.—The i (mu will lave nu objection to prononere for the validity of the inneriatte, hot itS order to do so, it will be ueeeseary 11l Cr sow Ile* n erilent, or authority in point, NO shol l tat where the part has declared they will proceed DO farther, that the Court should be called tiptoe to pronounce an affirmative sentence, ii here the isiarriage is attempted to Iso set aside ; but the suit is al.:min:mused, awl of course t bat mars riage remains valid. Dr. Aesefiii.—There art. one or two precedents that occur. Herr is ass allegation of the Cominittee, declar ing the marriage to have been contracted with an insane person, whilst the allegation of the wife propounds that marriage to have been contracted with a :sae person, and her wititeeses have helm examined by a great HMSO ot . interrogatories, to show that the marriage was ion : tracteil with a sane person : and by the evideure pro duced, she is enabled to make out that assertion ; oitider these eiremestaurea she is entitled to an affirmative eels tenet: of the validity of that warriagv, 41flwrwilie the i party would lose all benefit of the evidence she had Fe diatnll on her allegation. ! /4 . ii . Juust N iciiim.—Woukl the a ffi rmative mittens* tin tIM case operate against any other party hut the Committee, who declore that they proceed no farther ? • Dr. ARNOLli.—Surelv it would operate agninst all par ! ties questioning the validity of the marriage, by that sen ' fence coming fruits the only competent Cutirt to pro nounce such marriage valid. Sir Jou,/ N . ictimit.—Where a person charges another in Mediation of marriage, and the Court is to try whether that inarrigge had actually taken place, it is a very different question Irmo that 0(11)4 Committee pray ing sentence ist nullity, and declining to j•.oci•ed further. Mr. Aalloidi.--ealse party praying out to pniceed is a manifest injury in this case, because I believe the ob taining an affirmative sentence in this Court would be a bar to all other snits that might occur, either iu this or in other (courts, upon time validity of this marriage. Sir JOHN NICUOL.—IIUW can that be a bar to pro ceedings in other Courts?—a. 11. brings a suit of nullity, anti C. H. sets np a marriage. I shotild be glad to see some case iu which the Court has pronounced for the validity of a marriage in bar of other suits. I). AnnaLb.—lt is contended on one Laud that this was a marriage coatratied by fraud with an ilium. person ; on the other hand it is affirmed to have been with amine pennon ; and if sentence was pronounced for the vapidity of such marriage, that sentence would he a bar to all farther proceeding., whereas Co. party here declining to proceed is a mere failure of t.te libel, awl amounts to no more than that the party have failed in proving tire nullity of the marriage. Sir JOAN Nicitos..—You already have your proof of the fart of that marriage. Dr. Annofits.—Yes, but the other part has itnpngnetl that marriage; and I now pray this Court to proceed to an a ffi rmative sentence in bar of auv further suit winds this dismissal of justiee would not effect. The husband, for instance, upon fresh evidence, wig's& proceed again in this Coed foe nullity of marriage. •The question might be again opened in the Prerogative Court, sad it would be open for the nt.xt of kin to question the mere dismissal of this suit. I contend, therefore, that Maly a definitive sentence would operate os a bar to further proceedings: Probably the effect. of it essay be it case of such snit resperting property by will in the i Prerogative Court, arising out of this marriage, if such 1 alionld be attempted, as to question the validity of this Marriage, may be attended with 'vomitus exneuce be yond that already incurred, and in thatmane the woman be obliged to surrender her rights for want of means. The costs in this proceeding would.be alone saffiriesit to deter others from appearing for her; aryl she would put I have the like opportunity of establishing the validity of geeLgbee innefirige, iieranse the seine evidence could hii again ot at, because the despots* who solemiiizeil the mar is actnalliktid NOM this suit rointhettreil. The Chaomey. set of wl thiii re ieimein4 Ono% 1•11 doom he most other proceedings die infotainment of the wife. She vroold Om" 4 " 111111 eery under very dlffetent MteartdatcA, If she mold produce a definitive 'entracte with reggrd to title issue, so that she might come from the competent Conte of Jurisdiction to declare the validity of her marriage. which could be neither misrepreeented or iiistaket. Sir Jonx Nicsiist..—This snit being sew nooppeold. it would only be an er-paree proceeding. Dr..lnstoLn.—The party having - here declared they cannot.proceed to definitive sentence, that they ran re sist nothing that is set up by the other party. Whilst in going back to the Court of Chauceil, it appears only that the libel which charged the marriage to baA hoes I improperly solemnised has failed, which is merely a ' dismissal of the party. So that here was left room fee misconstruction, in giving au explanation of the mean ing of this sentence. The marriage was here propound. ed on the one hand, and denied on the other; and the party establishing the validity was therefore entitled to definitive sentence. Sir Joon NICHOL—The Court will have no hesitation in pronouncing for the validity of the marriage; but Tau are insisting on the Court's pronouncing sentence in a snit which is not at all resisted. Dr. Antvoi.o.-11 is in fart a soil of jaetitation. Sir Joni Nienot..-1 wish you could produce 11011le precedent. I am very much disposed to go with you, but not to open a door for collusive suits. Dr. Aasotho.—l submit upon the evidence we are ma titled to an affirmative sentence. I only ask to rest the case upon the evidence produced, in onto; to be published. Sir Jour NICHOL—I Lave nu objection to pronounce fur the validity of this marriage, hut whether you can have it otherwise than at the expense of that part y who proceeds no furth e r : and will n o t th e C our t o f Chan cery understand the effect of dismissal where the party pursuing declines to proceed, and that the marriage therefore remains goods to all intents and purposes ? Dr. Aaxot.u.—The impression is strong on my mind that there are precedents, and we inns' search for them. Sir J. is nut impossible but you may Sad precedents in support of your case, where the Court has rot-mkt' affirmatively of the legality of the marriage; this Wilds the inference that exists upon the validity of the marriage. Anxiii.n.—lt is of great importance to the whole family that this question should hr finally set at rest. Sir J. Nictioi..-1 wool agree with vim that the Court of Chancery oaud i not lie satisfied that this was a sentence to all the world : fur the common principle is, that the suit being dismissed is at an end with these parties. I won't say to any other parties. Itr..taximu.-11 oniy wish the Court would decide the validity of the marriage, so that nu person can agi tate it again. Sir J. NICHOL—There is a difficulty I wish to he re moved. The Court cannot pronounce an irregular sen tence, hut the parties may satisfy the Court by pre cedents. Dr. Anon; was heard on the same side. ... • Sir J. worm requested time to consider the matter, and in the we. !ime directed a search for precedents. COURT OF RICCFSE, Fsa. 10. IMIT.ITIVE PEPPER. TIIE KIXU r. grMARA. T!iis was an information ag.inst Joseph Somme, an oilman and dealer, for having in his !possession 56Ihs. weight of adulterated or imitative pepper on the 12th .114 lust. Lord, an officer of P.xcise, who went to the house of the defendant, proved the tindiug of As fabricated at ' tic!e. 'file defendant admitted that he had the article in his possession, but he hail bought it as long hack as the year IMI3, seven years sitter, and lie declared lie ail never since sold an ounce of it. When he pnrchailetbit, lie was total by the seller that Is might call any thine." instead of pepper. He hail used a little of it himself, anal, fur his own part, would prefer it to what was called " Kenai UP pepper," which pail so high a duty. One of the Commissioners asked whether he was not aware that be was at least committing it moral offence having a spurious article for salt: It could nut he credited that lie would himself prefer etch trash to the genuine pepper! The defendant declared he would, anal said. that as it was " all nonsense for pour people to think of buying real pepper," hr did not conceive it to be so bad an of fence to provide a substitute. V e added, that he w as wholly ignorant of any .pct o f arliament against the sale of such an article. • 'l'lll. Excise Solicitor admittigl that the Ac' had not passed more than a few days Iwevious to the fabricated pepper being found 111)011 the defendant. .The defendant then called the person who gave infor mation against him, to prove that he merelv got a um?l of the imitative pepper, anal had not botiglit it from limo. The evidence of the informer was objected to. 'rite defendant urged that 1 e was 'adored to keep the article *Oh • view to his support, anxious as he was, being in difficulties, to turn an honest penny. Still, however, he never sold an ounce of the article. He was at prevent under a rommission of bankruptry, and more over, hail fro wives and some children to support.— (Much langhter.) Lord, the otheer, said, that this was t excuse ori ginally set up by the defendant, wh e n lirwent to Isis house. The Court adjudged the defendant to pay a fine of 101. LENT ASSIZES-WESTERN CIRCUIT. More Mr. Baron Wool) awl Mr. Justice Bcasoran. S(n IMPTUN—Montlay, February 21, at the Castle of Winchester. Wiurs—Satortlav, March 4, at New Sarum. —Thurstitt y . March 9, at Rorchester. DEVOS—Mott.lay, March 14, at the Castle of Exeter. Citv and Counts of Emarsa—Same day, at the thild. hall of the city of Exeter. CORYWALL—Wednesilar, March 22, at Laurie...nun. SOMERSET—,:OIItIar, March 27, at the Castle of Taunton. POLICE. RINK roruntiza. Bow-Synritv.—.l boy, apparently not more than lb years old, mas bronght in from Covent-garden watch honke under the following ciremnstances: Mr. Williams, of New Bond-strect, stated, that on Wetlnesdair evening, a respectable looking man, wearing a ;talr of silver spectacles, came into his *bop and pur chased twb hats, observing that Int %nfo? himself, and the other for his son. In payment for theni he gave a M. Bank of England note; and, having treeelfed the difference S 7l. Is.), he gave hi s address " t'aptain at Joy's nroad Hold, Colree-Imuse. Nunn, Covent. emir's," and lie desired that the hats might be sent tisere, Thee were sent almost Instantly, but the people at the Coffe;-honse knew nothing of f orplain Clew. and they were taken %se% . arsin, Hy this time the asta, having been e pare* with - another, wits titillated tu be a turcery ; and, whilst this was in doubt. the ,PligjEur in for K tlrg besll,l6l4l.4;eetelaCiees iiiiiiiiishhaiWiiiii . k4igi i a l rt New efe re 4aharge la she Magistrate . him for pi *a Mau* next ; a gibe was Wag gi ft b•r, some et the aims raiagehed lAN ei once before convicted nailer the Polies do. ill reputed thief. ar comma or OOTTMO AND mamma . . Maaumaaysid-sraarr.—A rameh aural d m & eoachsualter's apprentice, was c argil) wid ; cit i a rl rob to b Lefty, a p erson ro s e the terapiket, during the last West-nod fair. The prossestog stated, that he was attacked i s persons, in a cart near /Whore turnpik e , oa ',ea days et the fair, =ft whom were th e pr i me, Healey, since ex for his tuna; 0,, fair, and liarret, since transportl. nlati rbey e ; cart and hustled him; but he saved a cons' of money be had is his pocket belonging d g i t ployers, and he was cut with a sharp instrument prisoner or by Barret, but he could not state —The prisoner was fully committed for trial. EXTINIIITS 1:TTILIII/SO Or /011ORD move A young man of the name of Staaliarol, who al% various characters, was charged w it h uttering goi 101. forged notes.—Apeat number have been tri g * hi m , whi c h he passal, at jewellers, coffee-hoe s , • brothels, and he was meanded to give persons as sh t tuoity of appearing against him on a fut ure d ay. ' Tag AILTIO PLATERS' 1 : 0 1 11 1111KATIOT. I ' SIONI-11ALL—Yesterday James Seyaor, a j e , man silver-plater, was brosight up in th e cust oe ge: 2 ret, the officer, charged with assau lti ng Mr. •• Smith. jun. who carrier on a inanufactory for silm l plated articles at Camberwell, and Samuel Jacks sk i foreman. hlr. Smith chimed, that the prisoner hail bees time in his emploornete, but having entered iatoa bination with other persons who had been ai victed, he dismissed him; in consequence of prisoner acted under the impulse of revenge, OM* proses utoor a most tremendous blow with a stal ls seated on the dickey of the Camberwell condi. titer slope:seed that the prisoner bail way-144180 man, whom he brat most desperately, and wiles whirh was in the slight time, his conduct trues rageons, that the officers were compelled to can; .on their shoulders a considerable part of the Ivor The Magistrate ordered the prisoner to patio* each ease, and to give 4$ hours 'stoke of the san k RIOT AT LASIOLTH CHURCII.—A man nand was charged by Brown, one of the beadles of parish, with entering the church in a state of Lion, and disturbing the congregation at a fa vice.—The prisoner having been some time out of because, with his wife and four children, charges* the parish : bring now in full work, he still lose the came as a matter of right, and if th e or fused 1 • , be invariably loaded them with lb' invectiie On Wednesday, Brown having d vanciug any 'wore money for him, he went sissy, after getting drunk, followed him to the chard, a funeral procession had just entered, and Alt elergym an was engaged in reading prayers, he swear at and abuse hlr. Brown, who, with great iv, got loins into the watch-hose and locked bin Sir. CIIAIISERA laid lie should eadearoar to back some of the money that the par it • had on such a worthless felfos by fining a s .'" ' drunk.—Prisoner: " less d---d Ile; 1 n' t irk g all ; it's as great a lie as ever was."—biao s io,si shall 6.e you one shilling fur that oath,"—Aboil ". Fine and be d—d." Mr. CHAMOSIS this inlet' to be locked up. avvaserrtp 11111111 1 i iir . LA MOITY.STIt It a T.—MITTJ, Grip ill fore ROOILMT MINSMILL, FACI. with staliblate son with a clasp-knife, with an intent to hill.-111 remanded for further examination. 11114 SING MATCH.—Mr. Mills' match, to rra sive miles in two hones, was undertakeNiusd lost yesui on theiratford-road. lt was for MI guineas, p. p. 1 pedestrian did tire miles in the find half-hoar, sel ten miles were accomplished in nue hour and tweets' The next fire miles were done is thirt♦-teo vim when he began to fail. and lac upon time widths' bent in the eighteenth mile, when the two hours it minutes had elapsed. EEE CORDIAL BALM of GILEAD pond great ellicacy in all nervous disorders, heliml w nesse& heaviness and lowness of spirits. dimes sight. eunfased thought and wanderings of the Wail. wip and mela,.c:toly, and all kinds of livsteric eomp'• Et. 11 tractunliv go off by the n. 6 of ties salubriou. Ce 66.1. s of the stomach, latileneins. sad Motto a Ws, I a safe and powerful remedy. It is admirably calc#l afford relief to broken and decayed constitationsortm si remedies have been anincersithl. The Cordial Halm of Gilead la sold in bottles. mkt' sad I*. each. by all medicine venders In the Unimile dom. with copious dircetinwa; and is London kylk, I eigh. IS. 14trand ; Bacon and Co., oxford•ormi Ward. llolborn ; sad Mr. titnidling. Royal Rl 13 Cams may be had at Gilead-House, ae= !, DT JUNIPER '4 ESSENCE or _ THIS ESSENCE is a safe, effectual, and, sent rented) in Flatuleneles. Homy and Moat, in the stomach aqd bowel., latllgestion. Hysterics, a ation and Lassitude arising from atinospherie hest of Apetite. and in the Spasmodic Affection of the Ms sod bowels, so common to inflate. Essence of PIPPERVINT Is so well known at family medicine. that the principal object of Sit MN mast is to guard purchasers against the neasesmill felts which are prepared by draggists. die. Thit e r i g J. P. Heath Mid give. Is, to see that "J. P.ll base," is engraved on the Go% eminent stamp.—Prima mad la. lid. Mold h, B. Edwards (agent to Heath), 111 Church-lord ; pad also by Ward. Holborn; Ommilehtl site the Panthlon, Oxford-street ; Emerson, Batt field: Willawt. London-bridge; Purse. Portemoott: worthy and Co., Plymouth; Beam, Yarmoitth; Deal. &e. &e. ti BIRTHS. On Tuesday last. Mn J. Tomtit's. of s On Tersdn) last, in Hill -street, the He Sullivan, of a daughter. On the lith instant. hlrs.Pldlip Page, of ford-row, of a &seeder. MARRIRD. Vesterdiq.*. R.B.Turner. of Newhigto4 al. sou of the late Sir Barnard Turner. to Mary daughter of the late Samuel Mesh*, Esq. WTI*" DIED. An the 9th instant. at We'worth, DasidlAA the ON year of his mgr. Oa the Id Intent. at Kentish Tows, the /la. late of Knight Ryder-street. Doctors' C A r Os the lastaat, at .Ca rebenrall is ler - Moseley. sister of the lite Dr. Iliesekr. I t tif Pinspitel • •e. TP. • ; Qs the litit lastest.. 1ir..11/11bare Chepollia4 street. Penton% We: in the 7116 peer of big sp. Lost6a : MOW ' 1 , 7 doe_ R. IV lit IMILLAtrAtt, ."r. site Rt. Clemeut's Cherch where all " • -• - to . ts;