The Statesman. — London, England, 1814-09-24 00:00:00

. f • ppris+! lutbch less mitideribi*; does the increased prodOce span a farm hear any 'proportion to (he in. creseed expense ?—I think that the increased et. liettswatiswers ; the produce is Increased in .propor tion. ' • Is that product, upon a farm well conducted, and with sufficient capital, doable what it is upon a . fkrm where capital is wanted, and the old course of husbandry is followed)—Taking an extreme row, of a want of abflity and bad management, f think It is. Of late years, has not the progress of improve _ Vent, and the extension of the system of high farming, been very considerable ?—Yery conside red% Is k liltely•to : eontione to increase ?—I do not chink that tkoilmpreiwemetit could go wrn with an awe. tage crop at the present price. Do you think that many of the poor land* would in fact be put out of cottivation ?—f think that the clay lands in Strisex, Surrey, and Kent, would be thrown out of cultivation.. Yoe stat.d, you are acquainted with Lincolnshire, have the improvement 4 been very great in that county of late years ?—Yes, I think so ;'a large quantity of lands have been taken into cultivation that formerly were not so. Have very greet capitals been employed i* reclaim ing and cultivating those lands ?—There hare been large eaphats employed in it. Would Ss. a bushel afford a fair return of profits to Those :have so employed their capitals ?—Nut in Are _ WYtalt. rovetnents still going .un ?—They have+recebred,ri check in the lens in tincoltuddre. • Do you apprehend a (limit:Wied produce will fol . - n. in that- part of the kingdom, if wheat continue Wow I. a bushel ; will there he a difficulty in find ing tenants there to take farms ?—At the rents they have lately been let at, I think they VI. Supporitig the price of corn to be reduced upon the average to Ss. a bushel, do you apprehend that *much of there lands will be laid down to pasture? —A eteat deal will be laid down, but some of those lands ate not fit for pasture. Is It the general practice in the part where you are employed to grant leases ?—No ; it is not. Are they let from year to year ?—Yes. Is there not an understanding between the land lord and tenant, either that he should be paid for improvements in the event of removal from the farm, or that his rent shall not be raised for a certain nom ber of years, as an inducement for him to make ins., provements 2,—Tberw i* -Sort- wort of confidence be. t %%veil the tenant and landlord, that they are in No fear of being dispossessed ; they do not expect to hare their rents altered 'above once in 12 or 14 years, and they go on from year to year. In the counties of Surrey, Sussex, and Kent, if a tenant Is removed by his landlord, he is generally paid liberally for his improvements. Do yoo think the farmer would ventore upon prorements with the slime spirit Ind confidencO, if he had not en expectation that the price of corn upon tft% average of 14 years, during which he expects his rent not to be varied, would rather rise than other. wise think the increase in the price of corn for the last 20 years, has been the great itimulus to im provements in the cultivation. What is the comae of husbandry you now follow upon the,landi yoo occupy ?—I have two sorts of land, turnip land and heavy clay; on the turnip land I.lsllow tog toruips, sow barley, then clover, gene. rally pea•'stter, and wheat, and then fallow again; upon the heavy land, fallow, for wheat, then clover, then peas or beans; and wheat, then fallow. Should you make any variation in' either of thote courses, if wheat was permanently at Ss. a bushel ? —1 should let my turnip land be four or five years in grass seeds before I ploughed it again, and should follow the same system with the clays, if the seeds should continue so long. Then what diference would this variation make in the quantity of corn raised upon your farm ?—I should probably redoce my arable land one-fourth at least ; consequently, the produce in corn would be reduced one-fourth. How soon would you begin upon this reduction ? --I should begin this alteration in my•coene of bus. baedry next spring. As far as yOur experience goes, do you think that bidie' the same circumstances, marry other farmers would follow the same course ?—I am firmly of opi nion, that the tinintity of arable land' will be mate• rially reduced, if the present expenses attend it, with the price of wheat at Rs. Do you think that the lands that will remain in cultivation will be managed With the same spirit and the same expense as at present ?—I think the farmers who have only their farms to depend on, will not be able to do it ; t believe that to be the case with much she greater number of farms. Are the expenses - of repairs upon AO living don. Mad within the last 25 years ?—I believe they are ; every sort of tradesmen's charges that we employ are *doable& Do you not expect that the expenses of colti•a tion must necessarily he reduced, if the price of corn tit Pight._ l dare my the price of labour would be reduced, though bars not felt that dirett yet. The feeding horses and servants, and every thing of that sort ?—Servants is not reduced yet; meat is nut much reduced. r *,) be continued.] A mason, at Brecon, a short time ego was order ed to erect a tomb-stone, on which he inscribed the age of the deceased as 89. His friends, finding the ag e to have been 90, insisted on his adding , n ofiher !leaf. This the ingenious Weichtnan access. i abed and the stone now actual ly bears " aged 801 1" A shocking accident happened on Saturday after iron, in Warrenham's coal-pit, near Pontefract isild.44-A boy pleying near the spot, Ucidentally felt in, avid being observed by Mr. Thackrah (of the firm of Russell and Thackrals, plumber' and gluier.), • was pissing at the instant, he,.. Mr. T. instantly descended into the pit, but either owing to fool air, or some accident, he MI out of the bucket. After some time another attempt was Made to rosette both ; whets Mr. T. was found dead; and the boy moat dreadfully hurt. The latVer'was farthwittibiken to she liifirtaary, With little hope of recovery. Mr. . *as left a site end font children. „. • . • man to Mr. shamed with - hot wiggon,at the time John May, tha Id inst. ha in Konsil heti him asked him where he had not got yard. The Act not convicted him An Informal' the proprietor inforn►Rlity. PICK POI an (ICUS-KVA °lacer usually tre, *as charged with attempting of others in the uight. Mr. B. watched the fellow till he could meet with an officer, and saw him put his hand in several pockets, but he got nothing. The only article found upon him thatezcited any suspicion was an empty red morocco case for spectacles. The Magistrate said, that the matter was eleer enough, although as robbery was proved j and .he lamented that no funds attached to the office to !enable the Magistrates to advertise all the articles found on suspicions persons : but an owner for the. I spectacle case might be found.—Committed fortnight. Mr. Carus Wilson (not Mr. Williams, as the Gawk was stated by mistake), stated his complaint against the driver of the hackney coach No. 509. Passiug through Goodge-street is the afternoon of the sth inst. he took this coach 509, got in, but was asked by the driver if be, Mr. W. would want tickets* be ing answered in the affirmative, the coachman b aying none in his possession refused to go the fare, telling Ur..W. be should not be taken one step if ite de: itarlded a ticket, besides behaving in a very -mak and improper manner. Mr. W. remained W the esech 54 minutes, the coachman still refusing is go Albe fare, till a crowd collecting round thesosell * Mr. W. called out and said, " Driver, take me, I'llypey pea your fare:" the driver came and mid he waald not take him without his. saying he would spit Isis bower pay him his full fare., and ant deemed a. ticket : having consented to this, he mounted bleb.* aotalrove off, Mr. W. haring never left the till belted arrived at the place of destination. W. applied for redress at the office in Essez.street, Strand, and it was there be was told that he could not even be heard without a ticket. He then applied to Queen-square office. The man`in defence said, that he bad no tickets. The Magistrate said, that as he milk and (night $ have had tickets, it was selesallication of -Isla ; duet to be without them. It was abominate these gentry should have bent enough to set t selves agaiws what the Leilalifeisrlie* enacted. stood fined"2os. • -.- hir loan, referring to the third clause of the new Act, said, that the refusal to give a ticket did not sitbject hius to any penalty. The Magistrate wished the mats:iat linifietiF to .know, and to communicate the information 'to his brethren, that the conviction was under 9 Anne, made perpetual by 1 Geo. I. for " abusive language and other rude behaviour," which accompanied the refusal of the ticket. The mere refusal carried its iron penalty with it, loss of fate, as no one was bound to pay without a ticket; but if that refusal were accompanied by "abusive language, or any other rude behaviour," then was the case brought within the old acid useful Act of Anne. The man paid the fine. HATTON•GA astx.---Yesterlfay Chnsiin . Missy Eldridge, a sea-faring man, *as finally minified, being charged with defriuding a cello* shlpshnje.-oa It was stated that the Prosecutor came front Illa^:11' few months since, ,that be received at Somerset:lmes, labont 801. as prize-money, and having formerly . . sailed in the same ship with the Prisoner, by which he became acquainted with his pother, he entreated her with 3fri. 101. to take care of for him fill he should want it. A few days since having occasion for it, he went to get the money, when she informed him, that Meted paid it to her son, the Priseneri he having taid her he came from Prosecutor. ' This statement being conirmed by the Prisoneet Mother, 'Eldridge was committed, for trial. Au Apothecary, in the neighboerheod of Charl. ton-street, Somen-town, war sommoned on a coat plaint exhibited at the instance of the Gentlemen of the Court Leet, for having illegal weights. The 'Defendant was convicted. In the rnittgated-pewairy of 30s. and costs. Two perions keeping public-houses in the neigh. bourhoud of Somers-town were summoned for using and having pewter pots abort of mestere. They *ere convicted in the mitigited penalty of 30s. each, 'and costs. UNION-RALL.—Mis Thomas ffri/Oorra, lad Thomas Ram* re ere Marled on suspicion bf stealing a quantity of fro# from time Arden d Mr. muter, of It otherhltte. Hifiley, II watchman, salad that he stopped the risonan about three o'cleek on ` 1 Sunday morning, in Graugo-road, with a goon tiff of apples, pears, and other fruit, Is two bags. He enquired where they had got them, and ma they refined to girl occount, he detained them. Mn, SaireY's gardener stLted, that on pkag into the pr. OFthe den ate bad `beat broken open, and that r of fruit bad been Aaiun away, and he had bet the 'fruit Wad in Pima** of the wu his master's preyed:. They were 1 for re-esaminheien• Hain; the etiebrafici hit. in length titbit' frian plitre 9,itt•e4r ti ;ii;l44 vac NO recitteeliti ha f • *tear hi Mai. 711. brit/ litie 1 at 9 . '4 ... _ the husband would be destroyed. The law as it stands, allows a man only to be responsible for the OM:marry debts, or those incurred for the support of hastwife and children. The debt in this elk was not Necessary, because the woman might lb. been supplied in her husband's house, and if "be flied abandoned her home Without her husband's 010s:ion she bad forfeited all right to make con tracts- in itis mime. Mr. Agar contended, on the dicta of Jedges Itayesimd, Bailer, Blackstone, and ethers, that if a woman elopes rom her husband's house without his consent, st tradesman who supplies her with ntboesseriestannut make her husband liable. If‘ an attempt was made to fix theltddlitind' with a debt of that sort, the Plaintiff was bootid . tn show that his wife eloped either in consequence of op preesiensor that the husband consented to let her go. let this case there had been no consent on the part of the husbana, and therefore he could not be liable. Mr. STOWS', on the same side, said, the question was , whether a husband is liable for the debts of hit wife, in case she elopes without his consent. The Courts bad decided *hat a wife is incapable of mak• ingest', contract to bind the husband, unless it is such a canttact as implies his consent. In this case a ter—, solnation had been put to the right which the law gine a wife to contract debts payable by her husband, therefore be husband was not liable, and the verdict could not stand. Mr. REYNOLDS said , his opinion remained the same , as it origin* F , -r+ investigatior he Wes 'panned t- Counsel world and (lir_ the Ye t ought AN APOTHECARY'S BILL. • »Ise action was brought by a medical man, to re aler 81. Os. for medicines and attendance. There Ins no defence, but before the June addressed the jury, he observed, that it had been doubted whether a medical practitioner can charge for attendance. He adVerted to the case of fowler, an eminent apotbe• carp, against the executors of the Duke of Queens.. berry, in which the question was discussed. He had heard medital men lament that they were not allowed to charge for attendance. Mr. Hitt said, one of the charges in the Plain. tiff's bill was for business done as an acconcheur, who certainly could charge for attendance. ,Joni -Does not an accoacheur come under the exception 7 Mr. HA trt.—No. It is for so act done. I hare ittintrai l in this Court, twenty midwives succeed in charging fof attendance. The question being left to the Jury, a verdict was OM% for the Plaintiff. WAITRIRAN AND CO. V. REEF. this was an action In which Waithman and Co. buten-drapers sougltt to-recover...l3l. odd, QV goods sold and delivered to the Defendant. Onus proved that Hie goods were ordered by Wit Offen dant, peeked up, and sent to him by a peislin now in Ireland, and who could not of course be produced at the trial. A demand bad been made on. the De fendant, wbo returned a letter, acknowledging the Tkat leiter., which was proved to be the De fendant's hind-106(in, was the only evidence; how. ever,: As there was no defence, the Jury found a ver dict for the Plaintiffs. BORDIR AaftICULTuRE.-The Third Exhibi - dee of the Border Agricultural Society was held at Kelso, en the 14th, when prizes were adjudged for the - beet sheep of the Leicester and Cheviot breeds ; ' few cows, hogs, improved implements of husbandry, and Lothtit Flatten! connected with the improvement of *e fermieg system, which is already so well on ilerstood in that district. Among other premiers's', tee or three guineas and two guineas to servants who llskriemeined longest in their places, and reared the =it number of chlklren without public aid. This y is represented es 'itemising rapidly in extent and utility. After the basinessoof the day, about 1400enttemen, Agriculturists, and eminent Breeders of Stork, on both sides of the Tweed, dined toge ther; Stk./. B. Itteozr.L, of Itiddell, Bart. M.P. and one "Ur the Vice-Presidents, in the Chair.— inen Sb Joniletired, Mr. Don, the Member for Rozburghshire, took- his place, and maintained the conviviality end good hurnour of the Meeting to a late Matti.• On Tnesda. Ahkillett 161 lest, th• mail from &- glutei wet foots's, km b sod llle boessts. - of r WPM not' - . Cape. Peron, a French Gentleman, 'est nn the objection of his being an Alien, and signing his half-ply to his creditors. The Captain pleaded; pertoustly, in reply, is resident in Englend 27 years, 20 of which !tt in the King's service, as a military crificer thi regiment of Light Ckagoons. Mr. Serjeerit PALMER stated, that he had pal extend the benefit of the ACt to Foreigners bi circutiistanceg, of which the present was a Owe one; nor could the half-pay be ,assi granted for his dignity, arid 'to vacate 'to the Captain's future services if recibisite. • He was immediately disch arged. IN THE MATTES 01 , MArrasper. I ••, , our. rottock objected to the Prisoner's dit i upon the ground that he had beim dishowird ' former Insolvent Act, namely, tlpalfosells' Act. • Mr. PUISICE SMITH, he the Detendiet said, tkie kit favour of liberty and where there was no chit. Of fraud, the Act should be constrain, strictly. Tin words of the exception were, " who shall here ten discharged under any Act for the relief of hod* Debtors." Now the Lords' Act is outitted, 14 As Act for the Relief of Debtors with respect to tho Imprisonment of their Persons," cod does mot gigs a discharge except as to the particular debt of 1b Plaintiff in the suit. In the Lords' Act Itself Om is an exception, nearly in the same words, sae dut has been held to apply only to gram! Janke* A F this the Cossasel4ted the case of Istassii decided-In the Court of King's Bench, Itted in the 2d vol. of Smith Reports, p. 41. )ut,oclit, , in reply, said he had great respect authority cited, it being the work of * Friend, but it appeared to he ckstiogaisho the present case. In the Lord? Act there express exception as, to the Lords' Act, sag • chi. stseeptiou • could only apply to sow In the, new Act there was an eaprill of persons discharged ender it ; and ails •al **copilots, which included the Lore/ being all Act for the relief of lusolvett, though not so entitled. gerjeata l'atota saidi that upon that Kiwi should think, the not expressly rneutieuii ~.ords' Act here was a clear proof of the in Lion of the Legislature. , And upin general pried! A ' pies; it was clear the Lords' Act *as not = o ak; the relief of ihsolvent Debtors. It only debtors to give op their effects, after being chervil in execution at the suit of a particular Plaintiff ; sad that they might do as often as they were in exece• tion.—Ho therefore discharged the Prisoner s . these being no other objection against him, - , . OLD BAILEY. . • •••—sams.-- . • , I I FRIDAY, Stn. ti. ' • • Moses Woolf Leipotan, was tried end dlMPliled or Ilehtslis in; Mrs. Stuart, the Lady 'of tJent.-Clll. 41111,14 Of the MA India Service. of various articles withal he SIM' been employed to dispose of as berm-co:int. , . . ~ , .. , The Prisoner, in his defence, ma the niiii& weefico*ribaad. The Recostoss informed him-alt this was eo defence.. 1-- Elliott was tried and enavitsed of steer b pi hristits. the property of Mr. Scott. in cotnoction with T , the Prb• secutor $ klionsan, who wan admitted asevidesieo het him : There were several ether indictments, . bat time any poidie interest.. The Sessions being ended, sentence was pimaliflite *bey ing Prisoners:— • William Norman, Robert Sites, Janson ..as, id* lKeith, Joseph Hopkins, alias Finch, Esther Tbanlipioe, alias !elfin dez, and Esther Ferguson, alias Cherry film transgolled fur life—Sarah Watson, Sarah Broadtleheathe tilltiegAmos. sad - Abraham Soper, for fourters. years—. Sarah Simmons, Joseph . Sumpter, John Tboroborough, Win. Roberts, Daniel hilainisN Jacob Luby, James Simpson, Richard Johnson. Thalia, TJP• note, Moses Woolf Lelpman, John VV ihnit, Joseph Illorphelk • James Neiman Jelin Weston. John Clarke, James Fiporjohn ~ Wright. Thomas Townsend, Margaret Ryas, Jos. Wialley.. o Renjaniln HoOkham, Thomas Dossiter, Jarnfll CLirke, `lamb Cristo', John Williams, Theme aeleiush, Waii n oi mar, alias Wells, 'Henry Clarke, William Basher, Jasper Morley, John Josses, Robert Roberts, Chris. Moss, John Radler, Cleo. (Mites, Joseph %Ville. Thos. Ceske, James. viias John Shep• herd. Wa. bladdos. Charles W ;likens. Wm• Coddeo• 11 1 14 Geo. Horton, th be transported for the term of .even ,ears — two to be imprisoned in the Houle of Correction at Clerken well ter twO years; Armen for yes 'earl and to onty.six for lesser periods—esgi!teee to be liamknad imprisoned in Neugato —fourteen to he privately, and te publicly whipped • several tined ls. each. and diitisarged, niN Ssriy-live were di;tharged by Proclamation :• .. . The Sessioas adjourned to 1he.40111,0f October next. • MARRIED: On ThntranY WI, of Sauey St&&ford, Boat, Ilet. J. If. Smith, lace-merchant, Paternoster-row, to Ad% 'Moot dallier , of Mr. Worley, of the former place. A i.. On Thursday last, the Rev. S. C. R. • Re'vill ' Chseplaio to 11. R. H. the Duke of Kent, to Agnes. only di ter of Henry Fawcett, Esq. of Portland-place, M. P. for Car Ott Thursday, Mr. John Dale of Patern:oter-row, to Mk* Sarah Hepburn, second daughte`r . de Jdbe Hophitra, Esq. of Bermondsey. Friday, Henry Tuition. Esq. 911*. of 401.1 &OWN Nistas, Esq. of 130ddiagton Surrey,, to Aaselia, slougliger Joaqk Benwell, Esq. of !Linnets. DIED. At Dionporr, Bengal. oa the 17t of Decontser. Ur' Shippen Arauld, Flq. Deputy Payalaster-Gesserai to the Boa. Last India Cosapany's ihrcA, Matins. • ' Ott Tuesday, Mr: John Dnlbe, of Clatalterwefi, Slam. &ludo ;lodise Hl* veer, Mn: litioabetis Ditusdolo, wife - of Dr. R. utaisbop's Sturthrd, Herts. On the ilst , latt.l44ll.Ed ward Witheratess, R. N. is the °2d it ed ar or his goo Of Cd. GoiVet-street , fora-square. A - • • ' LON DON! *Sitilag 'WO Pelptiiltiiil 14' iktiii; l 6.l., at / • ceiellese.* Orstrfli $l, Steigigalis:•• •- • a • _ .. . e '_ --....... 5aamei............_ - " . Gllr lietiltES S. POLICE. PAIL ¢C6 • COILIX7; &um. Ws: '• t, ' i • - • - •• • ' 7 4 00 . . . . Ambi , 4 4, fr 00 6, ; • ! .• -• . Wouvauttu awrireasLlMOSUL• .•,.; - I ) Yesterday a Court of gammon Council was Wi l l :T.—Yesterday Thomas ... ,pisigNOAtesieghtl•his- eillffiffit-t*, ' adnilita - ManlionTkiesse• ,i not jus h " aving li° a lre ho ' sh e el nat. :=l: l ll l' r n,t4 llr 114111 """ k1 " 1 " 11114 2, 11 " -W .Nu f igati " C 91119444" delivered 6 44 " t. vilo'i....miliiiillit - 4111burtor mellawmarl refoligmosey on bonds , for the fortheri mprofe , b .. e time his weggea was loaded with cahtl:' - , • a- •• - te• - a •'• " of the river Themee, which was reed tad ea ree d'i of Union-hall Office stated, that ' f = s atil ' - 'lllll Vriaffle/c bier t 1 !*e[ 111111.81, tie l ligi 4 'Ea 200,bonds were sealed accordingly. I S e Sew the Defendant 9 drivinq hii ! loggik,f4ireentediss tholgansweeisiFereritsews, dile be The Memorial of sundry , inhabitants of e s a l non, without a beam, twaltiOnt . itumtla iamb*, set of MO istoline, Tiselseekeskil ith• work to,consider the Charter of Ring r h i wird deliTerlog the coals, and a ft er* -1.... t bet o a re d h er t o pink top' . kee Wags and to take meeistreifor restoring the City's right, •1 4 'ere the heshel was. He acknevil ~,e9 4elego loyalist:km* conk willassit Abets' the least an efficient hingistrecy, and for creating a w it : 4 at t one, having by occident left It Iti • . • she aftermath etwellteed keen the Plata- Bridge Within'', was read, and referred to the C 46....4_,- :.:_l'lrrreteeessrles whistii emosilisteed Ms demand.— mittee (or. Ganes* Purposes. it admitting any . excuse, the y nangssivalw im ia Ammo fads beiwg -- prep* It was cootended, It was ,referred to the same Committee to e s s, iin the iienalty of 51. and costa. • ..-, , P....". Via the Alaska was MA- tikalle for any contract der the steps to be adopted respecting the e mow • Ilion was glob laid against Mr: I nst al IN* byi.be mile after Attila Ide house, without his Lord .hilayer's Deb Ouildttall ,being in a state 4• of the waggon, winch Was q • • •-z... dilapidation. • ' Ihmtwell Mit (Mr. ItTuoLus) lima Of • The Port Committee presepted a Report . for .!%' EI V• DCKETS IN THE PLAY-HCIUSE. ; ; ' ; 0060114 Viet the hatband washable , bet eneited It Oleeitts the number of Harbour Masters, snick m o rant:.---James Watkins, bretight ep by eialtietio Whims for the Plaintiff, with liberty ?bi egroW to. ally in attendance at Drury-leno'rheas Ceithall til set it aside. - a - - , ;ed by Mr. J. &phew, of Cotentry, ate; Miss to behalf of the Defendant, this (hi &SOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, Stn.% oq to pick his pocket*, and the pockets ivied t tile action could not be sopported. If it , he lobby of that Theatre on Thursday toed, be . , the whole system of thelaW for the .. 1. watched the fellow till he could meet protection i die husband would be destroyed. The ori d —....._ _....C a p _t. Peron, a French Gentleman, 'tit . omit - - - - L . ..".... ...e ii.:. k '........- A It— _ . - • ,-. ..- twits I same' as it originally was. From investigation, he Acts. For ti MT. WI. inclined 9 ? . . :,..., '.e a new case. The same :v. Longburst net, facts were not met. ....., ~. '' ..other. The question and reported onki was , whether the ii . "*' :4' :, be deemed not liable i Mr. Pori Old to pay the': •Otitri .• - In most cases, where , f or the aatii a wife haw r ' . '-.- '`.. ' besband teas not liable ' Learned Fri 4 s. fee ber 461444 . . 1 , 011/itery ha+been made able from th Fti to 1 against ber, or aserWirrei it separate' . nee j was no expri .1r°1 1 ? deed; antis tlit - epati there was no " . tie. f i e course th lb that prate maintplatinti, eteithttelled the ' isilver.: l er Act. hem- ltjsed ber. Hating pointed out a Millt .. bed distinctiop cepti o n of 1% between this case *edict . .. . efendiet'er- it general ' Counsel, he observed, that the rose of the husband I Act--that bt new to his wife's elopement, was Ilene ag her into the Debtors, tit( I not w or ld o nto cre dit. Os ) he Opera' view of the case, I. Mr. 4erje L . ~. end - the particular radii Itii retaiined of opinion that cipie h e shot PVD the verdict ought to *lnd. 1 h i rt l .t e ..o sr .A .II to his