The Statesman. — London, England, 1815-11-21 00:00:00

o LAW INTRI.LIGgiVer. COURT OF CHANCERY. Nov. 2(1. rettervosr TIIE erarren OP TAYLOR. Mr. HORN stated this to be a Petition front . Mr. Impey, praying that Taylor's ennitaisAmi of hank roptcy might he superseded, and his certificate re tailed, with payment of costs on various grounds, particularly on the ground of the fraudulent nratis employed in• procuring them. 'fete Petitioner's Citurtsel brought forward the fellowing a 1 egalion , sepe ported by alfitla‘irlt. ayl.or was areatterney, thane! the commission against him was taken out upoo s tim the ground that he was a nionq•llTTiienfr apdos borse s de'aler. The commis , ion,wes.,thetefsare voiaz DS•att attorney could not ls.considered .oedef the ti tle of a trader, or a charncter whseemsete voider the. Bankrupt Laws." in additieu to this the comretsaiee was•frauduleistly a,id.bv caeicert obtained. The pi t titionieg creditor, Bfatt, who proved 193 L. Tither it, wee merely a nominal creditor, and was never worth above ten pounds le his-life time. ,When ritipttioned *Stir . r.egard, to. the veluable coesidera r tioe which he bad• given to the baukropt . , Areatesucti cr . edit with him, he was eni§arrassetfi and sc old_ only with any appearunces of prolathle.honerity eccosset for, 501. Eten this last seta was raises in a wee not eery satis factory, being said to ..be incurred for, ,Ikreasl and china, although the hankropt ceeld have procired these 'articles much mord conveniently frOrn. other seurrters than-from hie shop. The messenger, who wag said to have weiched over the bankrupt's proper- , ty when the commission. *as issued, denied he was' ever employed for •thet purpose ; and, eonsequently,, the bona- fide creditors had sea security, that their' property in 'faylor's.possession was protected. . fa deed.Taylor himself seemed to have the managefnent even of the commission issued against him, as the cieditors who proved under it were net, in point. of fact, holders of the•greatest portion of credits, had the Petitioner's debt been rolmitti4 as it ought to have been. The Petitioner's debt was 2501. which Farm, together with that of at.otl:er creditor, who likewise complained, would have governed the corn taission. They, however, could not get full infor mation on the quantity or the nature of the various debts proved, as they were not allowed to inspect. the proceedings. This constituted another ground on which the prayer of the present Petition proceed ed. Impey's debt was expunged, and he was told that he could base no account of those which were admitted. Sir S. Romstr.T, for the Bankrupt, contended, that notice of the proceedings under the commission could not legally be demanded by a creditor who held out against it. The Petitioner's debt,, it sew true, was at first expunged, but it was afterwardrj admitted, and would now entitle him to his proper dividend. Page's debt, the creditor who held nut *Rh Impey, was allowed from the beginning. No proof of the existence of fictitious debts had been established. - Nothing but suspicion and surto* was brought forward as evidence of• such an assertion.— The profession of Taylor WIIF known as generally to be that of a horse-dealer as au attorney, arid even the Petitioner bed had transactions with him in that •characier. • Ilia Lordship said, he would read the affidavits, I and would postpone judgment till he had done so.—, . Because a men was an attorney, would„now appear ; no reason against his being •tt money-sctiverier or. a -horse-dealer. Every attorney was not. a moneylcri- I venpr, nor every money-scrivener an attorney, though such an idea seems to have .gone abroad. People .who buy and sell books, as was seen in a recentiti starve, were declared traders although attoruies, and ; the same might happen with attornies who these to deal in horses. • BROOKE AND CHATTER'S., IN VIE .MATTER OP. WAT SON AND CO. Sir S. ROMILLY and Mr. COOKE Supported a peti tion-in this case, which payed for the interference of , the Court under the following circumstances: The firm of Watson and Co. which failed sometime since, was indebted to the Banking-house of Wright and Co. to the amount of 40001. or upwards, in 1810. ' The house of Wright refused them further credits, . 1 .and required security for what they had already ad. vanced, or a discharge of some part of it. Brooke • and Chatteris, the Petitioners, here interpq.ed, and j became sureties fur Watson to the extent of 1 5001. each, making between them 30001. of security to Wright and Co. One of the• Petitioners paid into Wright's Banking-house his quota in January, 1813. Some time afterwards Watson and Co. became hank .viipts. They were indebted at this time to Wright's about 40001. and could only pay a dividend of 9s. and a fraction in the pound. Chatteris at this time paid to Wright the balance of the loss that would be incurred upon the 15001. for which he stood surety, and obtained a receipt. Wright and Co. then ad vanced a claim, which the Petitioners were not aware -could ever he formed, and which they 'tow enders- Toured to resist. Instead of considering Chatteris and Brooke as security only to the amount of their promissory note, or their deposit of three-thousand pounds, and liable only to make good deficits in debt to that extent, they stated, that they considered the 30001. as a general covering security for any losses they might incur upon the whole of th e credits which they advanced to Watson and Co. the bank ?opts.. The Learned Counsel argued, . that these could not be the terms on which the Petitioners pro ceeded, in becoming sureties for their friends, and that in the absence of legal documents, which could point to such an interpretation of their engage ments, the Court ought to order the 30001. to be ex pilogOd from the debts proved under the commission ; that Wright he considered as paid to such an amount, that he should have no further claim Opon.them ; end . that they be allowed to have their dividends with the rest of the creditors. Chatteris and BroWke were sureties for the amount of their a ritten agreement only, and having satisfied the claims of Wright and • Co. for deficienres to the extent promised, they as:, sumed their place as creditors to the bankrupt. Mr. Le tco, on the other hand, contended, th at the Petitioners became sureties to Wright and Co. for hazards on the whole amount of their advances to the bankrupts; and that the 30001. was a general covering pledge ageing all losses. Ile read several averments that such was the understanding of the [proles, and that such was the inducement held out to his clients in their loans to the Bankrupts. The LORD CHANCELLOR said he would peruse the ' S ..~. _ .. THE STATESMAIg ,1.. :- affidavits, but he :would sal at . ..pasent ,that if ther e . was nothing bat else sfetlaraJimi% 14 the opinions and 01)41 , i - standing of the parfles, he did not think that such potpie crisis:lice shOithralter the effect of legal documents. . „ , 11011E11Th This MAT TE"( ,?/ trevrtet. ,Sir S.. BoMu.l.v. intiodocel the . Petitinii . in thia case. soil. was follow . ed po the same side side by Mr. The facts 04;d were few, simple, and generally Ornate, on . the oppt4ite side. Roberts, peti. fierier,. was the ; partner. of Steyens, in business at firistol* before their bankruptcy ; and 'Beiren, the petitioning creditor, was the Attorney of the ba i ler ; Steyenigniea.bill for 1001. to one Spirey, which he offered feyacreptance at the house of Birch and Co. je Bristol, which was dishonoured. 80-. beret, the partner of Stevens, endorsed it, .but stilt iteletynient.eonld be obtained . . foc jt . Devoe then gave his security . for his client byjetiorsing his bill, ; arid it was accepted by,.,l3irch.. end ~ Tbis hap-, peited.„ in Dicenilier,..ql4. Oa the 16th of re 7. breary, 1815, the house l 'of BirCh dens nd ng Aleven -tendered a ,bill foie JO: slue to hi* frt,in. Pi khan., And Co. merchants , o f ttecurity to the bankers for the debt of Stevens and. Roberts, should they not recover paymeut from them within the date of .the bill. This note of Pritcbard" was, intended merely as security to the blekers, sad was never in tended to be used if Stevens paid the 1001. for which hi; bill was still held.. B.eforelbe term was expired, Bevon dematuled from ,Roberts and Stevens the amount for whicb he was then.serety with Birch and Co. and not obtaining it he took out is commission of bankruptcy. The. petition of Roberts now prayed that it might be superseded, on the ground that Be von., the petiiorting or the sole creditor, had iso debt due e t the time, and that in procuring it he acted in concert with Stevens, whip took this method of dissolving, his partnership with the Petitioner. An argument wax supported against the Petition by Messrs. Lcace and MONTAGU, tending to show that its allegatioes were opposed both by law - and facts. . • The tottn CuAscci.pott superseded the commis sing, ou,the ground'of Bevon having established no debt. , • . COURT OF KINC'S BENCH. TNt •'' • -• IllifQ V. THoVAS. ." The ATTORNEY-GENERAL said, that lie hitta Mn. tint. to submit to the Court, which had fin' object the removal of an indictment for murder," filo a juris diction not wi thin the circuit of • any of the judges of Assizes. Such ri proceeding had been recognized by the Legislature, In the 38 Taco. 11. c. s lid. 46 4n, i Act to regulate the trial of ,causes; 'inifictments; and proceedings, which irise within the counties of ,cur lain cities . and 'towns corporate, within the kipg • dem." It might ippeir, in thelfirat . instaufe l xreat-' ter of some difficulty. .f• Lord i:LLENIOR01,1011.-r-I remember I inaoe:eu tit plication of this kind, not in a case of murder, but of felony, to Lord. Kenyon, to remove tti4trial from the Quarter Sessions, in which it Gentlenian'of some distinction wa's charged with felonl, in stieiing 1100 i arms. • The ATTAIINV.Y.OENERAL also recollected the case for havitig travelled to Carlisle on the trial' his professional services were not required, his c lient having received 5000 guineas for that prosecutiori. Lord ELLEsruottouon.-tn,that case„. Lora Ken yon said, " no doubt I can do It. Id poipt "of 4w, • and if. I can I Ought." 1, The ATJOItNEY- GENERAL WOO— no tthat to ball parts of the kingdom, • fair Wel . could itot be hid; but it was possibte, that in some parti circeriv. stances might prevent the obtaining of -a satisfactory trial. . Lord ELLENBOROUGIi thou IA that the_effidaiit, in the case to which he referred went, a great way to show; that a Mir trial could not be had where the venue was first Isid. _ The A TIO axzy-t iiieuAr. sail that . .it was there . ' supposed, that. a cer,tale distinguished person opposed ' to the person charged., fiedgreatinflpeoceltt the no mination of Sheriffs,: who, of c ourse, hid the duty of summoning the,,JUry. In the present,cise, .the indictment had been. foupd at Rochester, a tqwn corporite, and the cilject wei, that it ehebbk- be tried by a Jury taken from the body of the county of Kent. There . were ,precedetita of removing in actinents from• Colchester, , Xing is. Wird 'fr.im a town In:Devonshire, under the 38N of the King; but thit ACt woulttnot asSiat hiMin.fhis case. Lord ELLEsuoaotaat . .—An application was ntptie to me, recollect, whe n Sir A. Piggott . was AttOr limy-General, of this kind, where a man, was to be witness in the Exchequer against a Magistrate for penalties, wes to be tried by That Magistrate iii a town corporate, fora felony, in eider to dioquiljfy him from giving his testimony. „ . . . ' The ArroatikY-fizomitit„ added, that the - Court of Rochester had the power to rewiterethktettrto the Assizes, but this had been peremptorily refused by them. ,If the recojil 'had beet) in the King's Bench, by the Stat Ute of 6 henry VIII. c. 6," for remitting prisoners, with thei r inilictments,. ,. to the' places where the crimes were committed," no doubt their Lordships could have removed it ; but then it would have been sent back to the jurisdiction from whence it came. Before that Statati , , however, of fenders removed their indictments into the King's Bench, where they " put their repose," the Court not having power, by common law, to remit it, NVliat he requested, therefore, was, that the Court would grant him a rule for a Certiorark to remove the in- dictrnent, and for a U abeas Cprpus,, to bring up the party accused ; that their, the record being in Court, the prisoner might be sept, to the. county gaol at Maidstone, where hg would be, found by,the Judge of Assize oti: the Circuit, and take his trial in the usual course. In dist pin it would go down like an e;.o.licie information, to. be tried under 'the Nisi Prius Commissiop t Then another difficulty pre. sented itself under the gsP ! o !g e It, c. 37, which required, that ID all caaeti'of wonder, immediately after conviction the sentence shell be passed, and ex ecuted within 48 hours, if the Judge shall dot. sae reason .to respite the 'execution. • The A Statute of Nisi Prius, however; 14 Henry VI, c. 1, seeded framed es if in contemplation of the present caws the title was, " Justices at Prior trey .site judgment of a man attainted or acquitted of, felon y ;" and it provided " that the Justices, before Own Inquisitions, *lnqbests:*.antrlitriesq- fetetn henieforth l• • 'rma Iriffs..r... II itilo VP II an. shall be taken fly the King's terre;•calledlit'isi!Pries,'l: ' Tht•Lbleuits also 7 6 .9 50 144 . 1 4 be oche 0,f,,,,, l Bet. shrill Aare power of all cove of felony. itedAree.iadadmitterijo ginned aq crechy. default, i , , R c!11, 9 . . frauds Oil t h e rese:: :: son 10 give,their judgrrientsoss . well where a man of conniving at very reweave acquit of felony or treason, or ; Where he is' thereef . -. Ile had also in thocouree £t(4: proceeding ap iii,t 21 attainted at • the 'day and place where the Said Into,. acconiplice, for the penalties, s n o re to t h e troth ,r sitions; Inqueiti, over Juries be so taken, and knot •his garbled itidewelitated boobs+, For the fir,, nt. thenceforth to award exectiiime to be - m ti - made by feree. fece,,Wiltisdayreceived OftsillealPtent of the C ou „ of the same judgment." 'Unless indictments wore whicltlvite impritenmetit ite, r k, se l seamy ga o l of s„,r : removed, justice might itot be attained in somecas.es. !folli . for i tivelears. for though he did not mean to .assert hat.t he fact , . .ini itfkeb.t:lisior auttlt 46'iirdir %rt. w l . im r . was so in the present, yet it. might haOkel ttiallitii i.' Illefendliati itedelteeni %ail& guilty ~ r It,,i n , i , Sheriff was the enemy of thin pt./newt, dod•thet-the oftoltstr , tetingele-Eacise (Niue". in 'ate eitoco t i m , ci Under Sheriff had declared that he would hang him, his duty.. There being .mass,y..circunertanc es iq f i. white the body from which- thesJarr_would be taken vourof the Iris tiers disclosed by the ca se , and, .a, might be so small, as to he -ethaustedoif.the pripotier they expressed their sincere contiiti on , they r,,,,, ' i n i n use rt odfoutb the e qu o l bst if obstruction. :. r e, c were to exert his right of challenging . ,„, . , . , • permitted toibe discharged oh 'their own recognizaer,. . ! ".• Mr. Justice Le Deawc asked if the AttOrtey:fle. .to tips when called upon. • They bore itscc:!.:: neral could prodliceany precedents in (teethe ;Orfila charaororrr u a g n g d ii i n t g , s a ee t th me e d motion, and the reply was in the regatire•tea itrl- sai is -fact, 4lictnients for murder. .. .., _ Lord ELLSNBOROUGKosid, that the: tligtculty,in .POLICE.. complying arose from contemplating the 25 th, Geo, li. If a Certiorari were granted, and th Prisoner .. ,ltibleAWEIA. yrElqllTs. were•tried at Nisi Prius, the sentence must be pass. nATTO N-GA IRO EX.:7— Y estertlity /Wee ffite co , 4 % , "a butcher, Wh'Oilies at 'Ne: 14; lan'cas-steno:, G„ b .s l ed by the• Court 'afterwards in Bank, which was directly contrary to the provisions of the statute of Inn-lane; appealed' Ire a summons 'to ans wer to so. murder. .. - • 'information laidiagainst !derby thil fientlemen lilts The ArreRNEY-GENIMAL Opprehended llntt . that go round to inspect weights and measures in ti, parish of St. Pancras, charging. bins wirerliaen g It power was given by the statute of Henry VI.. which be had quoted. If the Court should not thiolt fit (P. ken pound weight in his possession,.em stem* ,• to the Act of Parliament. Th e ch arge grant this application, he should feel it it deity.to.re. agree able 'beingproield; INis Decedent was convicted ia the move the case info the Court, that the trial might (see place at the bar of the Court of King's Bench,' by . la mitigatediSestalty of 201.•aniteotts, which he sternly ..refused- to gesty,• in consequeeice of which there si t Jury of the,gosiuty..of Kent. If the statute ofnettry an order 4 distress issued for hie goods e n d c h attels. VI. did not give sufficient power at „Nisi l l sfus, lie apprehended that the Judge of ... flyer Terminer'and . U141.0.N•1tA4 1 ,--if i el. Charleton was brought h e . ' * jail delivery, finding the prisoner . in his jail,,would fore Mr: gVANCE,. by M 4,• charged o n su i p i c i n 40E4 it his duty to try him for the offence charged: of stealing a iiiiiiitityriffeWls. • Lord ELLENuououse,sfter looking at the 14 May stired,`'that ai he'was going round'the 8 0 , rOugh , at an early hour. in the.morniug;' he sa w t h e Hen. VI. doubted whether it was intended to.indlude, Prisoner. near St. Geetge's Church ; carrying a largt which, : on' examination,..lVes 6 / 1 110 to contaia cases like the present : it was very fit, • however,. to be consid ered, if the Attoroey.gemitral made out . b lg, sufficient grounds on affidavit. five fowls and two ducks. The o ffi cer took him to .1. , The Arroaese-Gemettee then skirted the .sub. 'an d . ' tlye watcn-nouse, .oe a further search two foals 'retiti i y . pl licked, ahaLb laYgelueek of bey tivere 'found He fit! 'he had bought th stance of the affidavits - with which-he was' furnished. Thomas, the prisoner, was a marine oft board liesteip in` p r i s -.4a t I,.„, e k t e t „, that was in the course of being paideeff tit Chatham. IOW), of a ersetfitee licareeLen the coed. • It was a part of his duty at sentietil, to keep off-the He Witt ituanitted 'for ters4amination,pe Wader,. . ' day s to we if Roy, persou.woold come forward to 'shore-boats, whith usually mideivoirr:to-,get along. side for sake of plundering storetthrotegie the port. - c •li t i no , ,t e em. holes. The man- who had been . killed by him had -, tow-SiREtT . .— Irei . tillailolle and :fames /trope approached in One of these - •shore-boate ; 'end. as dieing' themselvieebrcithera, `Who were' appreheaded w s warned to keep at a distance; but; withiret effect:— b y beo.eg w e r .l s - atty o f. putr w ei .:o n , s itur a s i tel . i. Thomas, in consequence, being provided ---i'dth t ---. • ssight,:itvlt . leading 'to llorneeywobd.ho use felt it is duty to fire, but only with the design, set* artost4 wiSb, pistols,. valerwent, a second examine. swore, of frightening the man'in she bolt, 'who , wee . lion ! wbea .Mr. l 4ißli t , the .attorney, and a memb er stooping, bfft rising at the lhafant,lrecoived - the bail or olier gentlemen who have litety been robbed by that would otherwise have passed Over hide It foOrpias7atiedred, kimono ' of them could ide n tify - went on Id state severtel circumstances connected - t i l e d i,riko lt i o. .. • Tteerwareiennended for further easminatlin e with the Corporatiou•that would interfere with: s w- , - ' . tisfattore trial. Sucleas• the smelliness-6141m nuraber : Jarnas s Abegrats,. (Imparter 9( Mc sn. Atkinson a n d Jame, of persons from 'w horn the' Jury would ell sIiDONISL the woic-merefianti; id - Mark-Lane, a/Wei - atilt anothertsaati- Mr. Jusityp LE BLaNcee-Ciu you Omer '-ievitely ""holowg" Wirt ""th'ing . his 'algae" or a " saa " d ; • blattlenAnd.ely, Wipowrigh,.the dealer in ethics, fa Camp. case tstiere.a person has been tried, cinvicted; And thtf- ,tracer. sta's shared Irfth 'befog an acCerAary after therm, sentenced at Ned Pries t in.rt le row oder, bettor ony .ia•corwistitrtispae It law psa them to have been stoke. • • p ilalitt_to _thejlaritrulurs ne hare eire.o, stated, We I felony r -.1 ' " • llSMiedrira sere:tot Ittstre hooner eigisoent 'run, ant IThe 'Alga imsir-giNcnit c, acknowledged thagbe was cucsi4rr"l -YadY ciitre ~ .."rc-ruk.t...-ri. r, bad noi bein4ble to bad any instance of .the kind: atroll:Are trine : pty . ra ne thy , Ili fli n ch ! it " .:ota aw at Seate r er l ieic i s I - Lord Eeetegoannotr repeated his difficulty -in steep- epoilpip 'my /wale, at 921•ry low price. I getting over' the Statete of 2b GeorgeAL The • The eireuvrismeres rigaitoemaiow right . *ere, his having mil question s kowever; deserved consideration, tons h .keneveraaw Sharrithoefure. this trawaelson, and it was proved g : that he tad been in the shop at least [wire before the aftideviti dice not make out a strong case. • ,- *Shairatt . *Ws 'commitled •for• trial:end It was agreed tka The liTioltiief.Gestenae remarked that it was svaiaw right should headtuitted. to hail .., 1 . '' ' • 9 Misistow-wOusc - -Idonday, Margaret Hardy, alio sated as is strong 'the petty who night ultimately he tried chanted „ ith. ai . a ini i a yen s a t ctuth, p sei s ropeny 0 r5„,.,.. by the confined jvirisdiction, could perhaps venture pio ) er,., underwritt, her final evaminatiou before the Luau . . MAYOR. and was fnlly - cdtrianittd for that. to make it. •., mAßLllneweelli•aTitE.ET.,MOOßny. W. WORM a lad. wa Rule to show cause granted. TtiE KING V. JOHN WALKER, via. A m#eir, over which the Defendant had the 11 , , A.. • . ..'r . charged with stealing a'eheique of RN' _the propegy 01 . :0 , 14. laagtbr llb a ß t i r llTl 4 . l l l ( l.ll 4l? Ti;ll"%esfigrilk: k ' ),.1.111. COACH. ulit ' • • ..euETK-SQ6 A R . C.--Mmillay Was the day appoints...l far tit- rt. 1 - iierty ofsPertitig, joined to that of Lord Middletotti .examioation•of thnoelebretedOrm-lirealter,. Rutsert.lloherti, Mr. Walker having one day been cnurshig the hire, coonac"t h sei t. r a i i i . ui of brio. e lm ongred . il l oi n ifi ll in e rubbery v nr it i te ini t , ii l :l4l.4e 44 ran into the inatirie of Lord Middleton, where'it I was killed and carried to the mansion -house, where after notes to the amount rktoi. which were part of those -toles, Ern wads paid into the Uxbriage -Bank by the Prisoner, iii Ise , id aibill - s ight thr the i the brother in-law of his Lordship, Francis -Lawler, •na tia ln tm e en f t, l ' w and. wainwright i as it n w . the actreceiv of presennu 4 e it fer ste- Esq. resided; Sontelirev" . totes disputes :had 'arisen in .mem,ai blessri. Matternian tithe eii.'s, When he was apprehet consignetice Of 'this contiguity , and the Defendant ed .it h h y Lae great d n e i l i . m ; he4rhgetill . i r tg pect th llile t) ch:r;:t a :r:7oll 4, 4 rode towards"Middteten Hall, to deittsnd the hare ..v l4 /nrisvere Colonel tnend,,lwoltiv. • Miii Phillips, Mr. Green. 'which had been' Sleeted on, and.coursed froathisow is &c. &c. all of ibmaappeared.-ana.Saits alkliteltithl,fh lb PitA i gr manor. in '[hi way; he Met -Ott- Prosecefor, .blr. i o . f i ra' uic h".".g i t t . el l 4 l „ ( "e 0;.,,,,, ss*)r,. and ..._.,. air •Vrice, his &florae!. Lawley, and'hi?lbrother, - and reqteired -Oa hare to . haviag had some private conversation with the Magistrate. xr. be given to him. In the course of thempiversatioo,m.eutie l ettithisgentleinth ri d lworikl torthe spectal h o:• l l l. - 0 ‘; b ar t . Mr. NValkei• bet iffie Much irritated; 'used very op- ue i , , ess o u e ' re, t i l l r i: : :e in arc l a ji -g al re ' at au es iny ge a n Y ilet .t eo itri• S seal whiNe - N. probriotis language; and struck -the Prosecutor, rio l aie ens keishern its the oisce to. though ,slightly, upon the gun lie hint. upon his : I . l t h ei l ltZr . h c lu e s o . ri et e l d ara . ar i . iiii i . t c l d eri nee • shoulder. - Fur this assault, 'the Defendant had been . . nbm „ m il „„t Fhear the exaorinati .0 al . ft t ri n be i r i. i . l. T il t i . l i l r . c ,, lt x a d iv: , lace o. weak, consequently • th r ! if h i i-opiHr wjti mot tit tried, and found guilty,. and being lit; brought up 'pal to diVlt.ii. and I make f th.. commouicanuit al . t.u . res OA i• • raniesperration of' h.•:bint tse to receive the judgment of the Court, the report of 3 '"" 3 , ll k!'"D.t, be .. ( " R Y AI "' de . i 1 ,„ „fe exammanma. lite. timtletuen thanked Vr. .10 WI . V .. the Learned Judge was . read, on -the face of which it Ms joseleoess; and iiitlidrete fein, to miler. A contiOiba appeared, that the • Defendant had offered to amp,- degreearfrib!iets vias..boweveNinenitested, se get a viva .at fr'• .. gize at the tria.l,* . fer iris conduct ; but that the ot t er i • r e was net accepted. . The Defendini put•ip..an a ffi davit, in which he . ;stated, that the assault had been wholly uttinteif tional, arising only from the accustomed vehenience of his action. lie was not aware that he had corn. mitted it until the Prosecnror'nccused him of it. Mr. Serjearit Bonen addressed the Court in••miti. gat ion of - pUnishmerit„ impresking upon their 'Lord. ships the ueprecedented'eature of the offence, caused by momentary irtiletiort, and most probably, twin ' tent' `•• al. Ile 'trusted that every fair allowance would he.made for the I)efendatit's conduct, 'whets it was recollected, that he had in - troth 'received an injury, by being deprived of he game that belonged to him, ha vine been started by 'his dogs upon hi s Manor, though carried to the mansion occupied by Mr. Lawley. lie and his Client were both willing tndo the utmost justice to the gentlematily demeanor of Mr. Lawley during the whole transaction, and he hoped that the Prosecator would be ready to give equal credit lo•the assertion of Mr. Walker, that the assault was wholly undesigned. An apology had been offered at the trial, and from the first the De fendant bail been . perfectly ready to co n fess the error into which he had been led by the natural warmth of his temper. Mr. CLIRKE, on the behalf of the prosecntion, hoped that the' senteoce of the' Court would serve to repress' the,irritability which the Defendant con (eased. 5 - • •-• • .5 5.. ''flee seitones of the Court was, that the Defendant shriek] pare fine of LOI. anti:enter into reengilizances la kelp the pitce ) killsellin 5001. and - two sureties i 2501. each. ro : Oretn.—Yist! , rday a yowl& man,' in the sf;• rice 'of Mr. Edmunds, eqnduii-street, 4,, r 4are41 at 'the Marlborough:street"Offire, and stated- that it was returning d 6• •town , on Sunday (*y e lling, ilholt eight o'clock, and in pasi.ing 0% er mot . ), he was stqppcd by s.foopitd,_ who, in a me• nacing manner, clentnngetl lit moony. Ftn4lh'e l i' demand not iminedistely cotnplitd wire, 1, 4 0„: strong bludgeon in hh hand; he iiitned a hl. , w fat 11 ' 3 young man's- head, but the deep itrowa hat re pelled it r and •the rrang man having in Li.; rossecitoa a cane which inclosed n short he inst .nt:y turned the attitsA, and wounded the %Main, 10t> finding a stout resistance likely to he made, !hovel prudent to decamp.--Ili; ver:on is clearly identilieJ, and heis therefore likely to be take.. 11ARRIEti. On the 15th init. the Rev. C. Carter, Vector of (1-rat Lei, to Miss alenclhain, daughter or the late )0,0 54 " , Esq.:of lisliogton., (1n Sunday morning. at All'irollows, Barking, Tosser-urecl. Unfits Hooke Robinson, Esq. of Thropstoa. Northampto n. shire, id Theophila, yonnest datight..r of George 110 1141 1 i Eng. of Bury St: Leiniund'c;•antl mete to the Lord ilisho. Lincoln. In Park-street. Isllrkt. nn. Oa the 11th inst. Mrs. Tatler, B o . !, relict of the late Mr. ft:chard Tayler, of Loner tirow'•'* street. On the )sth inst. Mrs. Joanna Histrinnd, of Haverhill, SOfulk. aged 9/. On Sunday, a F ed 4g, Mn. L a a b e m, • ife of bookseller, Stilespole-street. • ••-- - . . LOV i)ON : rrentod aptlVubli-brd. by D. I.ovl Le.. tit I •rttivilic Ne: 4414166er) t, Yi.~ d • _.. r a~ ~~- . —"Ta ~: ' a Pia Bozo . A f' B uxl A l, hOld a 41u N inav h Want of du. infants the ht. f. fire re That Reba given It dile& ia P.irl of 31r J. R. C Hsu. T /Eon. ( H. !trot I) W. Willitn J. Ft) di H. Mr. M. Thom. o Mr. 11. lb.. N Pr-e : (;!,. e Suh-c r::ntL, Sanauri tru a a 0a Man Part I Sun RR bibit big gal, and Eidseite. Tome P !CIVIC 'rove Re pia*, en emote* i preheniii , ind Scim _ . The L and coral cnantry I The y pi grtvrd (I auA E. 1 ,11 Prime and Frits Cuturnin , out the THE I Firth Ed T. l B e, spuds (st Hasa' of matchless 1111 4eitillIfi t of Storks before, at Av Issu g iktil I.r hid, Nod ! Fetus' Tnr And an inAlliedi AR( II Mail fro,. sem•ron oft; E A 111 1 114e14 from yfr trot. Preps' rev 14 , 18. d7cifie i„ Obovrte W 7 r il & ll,' F I. 1 ~_ _ x. ,._ . ••• I T Th. ea a' - Ra prier G3lle —.-- Thi Fri Sat, Rem death •iew P Thal 20 yea bk ad of his day of Mary Tha efe fat (with Well +is CO!