The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-03-21 00:00:00

strike the Hi:use as curious—it was no less than 1401.1 for ; ayrnent to the French General in Chien; osilitreseu —(llear: anal laughter.)—lt was impossible not to be struck with the patriotic disposition of Capt. Romeo, who would not only pay such a suns out of his own pocket for the benefit of the British nation, but was content to lay out of it for nine years. The Hon. tient. next alluded to what was brought forward, after this was forgotten, a remuneratory pension. Captain Romeo, meanwhile, was not idle; he went to distinguished officers in the army. from whom he pro cured certificates of service. upon which a pension of tUI. a year wee granted, although eventually at the request of the Captain, Lord Bathurst agreed to give him 31101. instead of the annual suns. With respect to hie exile, and whilst lie was in prison, in consequence of the complaint he forwarded to this Government, they had deemed it their duty to apply to Sir William A'Court, and Intreat him to ascertain whether, as ;vas; stated, Captain Romeo was suffering the displeasure and punishment of the Neapolitan Government, in con seirence of any services be had rendered to the Bri tish. The reply to that application was extremely an favonrahle to Captain Romeo. His imprisonment and etile were declared to be in comequence of his own con rinct in Naples, subsequent to his connection with the British. He could assure the Honourable Gen tleman who presented the Petition, that the British Government was not satisfied with one application to the Neapolitan Government on the subject, Pitt the second brought another detail equally satisfac tory with the first, as far as regarded the exculpation of the British Government being at all to Mame for the persecution of Captain Romeo. Pt British passport had teen demanded for tbat inelia Willi it was true, lint the House was not aware that it was a fixed principle of this Government not to give a British passport to any fareiener, except in the case of a foreigner of distinetion. A British passport indeed was regarded in the light of a letter of reeommendation, rather than as a passport. Anti it was far that reason that Capt. Romeo, no doubt, was anxious to procure it. He (Lord Castlereagh) would net hesitate to declare that he would not have riven a British passport to an English subject under the same circumstances. Every accommodation was offered to Captain Romeo that was in the power of Government. lord Bathurst cave him the option of a free passage to Malta, with his expenses paid, whence he could go to Naples. lie hoped, therefore, the House would see that the British Government had dune every thing that de pend's' upon them in this case.—(llear,.hear.) Lor.l W. BEN I'INCK asked, did it appear that the :rilshir which Captain Romeo stated that he had encountered, were suffered in consequence of his being su:ijected to trial? Lord CASTLERBAOUI said that he understood Captain Romeo bad escaped, and was not brought to t ial. It was not his duty to direct that any inquiries st•ould be made, farther than to ascertain if be was siihjecteil to any hardship in consequence of haring rendered cervices to the British troops. Ile hal only to answer fur the conduct of the British Minister ; and h. was sore the character of Sir Wm. A'Court stood too high to he affected by any aspersions coiling from Ii e individual in question. Lord W. BENTINCK only asked the question, be ta:use it appeared there was a paper among the docu ments quoted by Captain Romeo from the King, or dering his transportation. With respect to the other ' , iris of the ease, he had only to observe, that the see s!, es which this indirislasi rendered to the British ra.v were of :1 stature deserving of the highest con s': ieration. With respect to the conduct of the Nea p.alitan thivertiment towards those who had taken part with ie.. British, it was most true that they hail been r• Irked out as objects of particular persecution, and t•ic moment after the departure of the English, the King of Naples broke all his engagements, and swept away all the good which the English hail laboured to iis!ablish. Ile was not acquainted with the facts hint soli; bit? he hail been led to make some inquiry into t:e subject after what had fallen from the Noble Lord (Lord Castlereagh) upon a late occasion, lle had in consequence discovered, that in ISIS, the King of Naples hail given out an Edict, stating, that in con *Auraee of his having been a party to the late acts of the Congrrss of Vienna, it w s his duty as far as he was able, to give Weil to the same, and therefore he ordained that the Kingdom of Sicily should he joined to that of Naples. Lord CASTLERF.ABIL in explanation, declared he l I:atl never heard of any such document as that quoted by the Noishs Lord opposite. lle hoped the Noble Lord . would produce the doeunstnt if in existence. When appliml to on the subject he had refused to give ft e King of Naples any advice as to his conduct with regard to Sicily. The Noble Lord (isird A. lientinck) karts' very well that he (Lard Castlereagh) hail, in conjunction with the Noble Lord endeavoured. in vain, ta administer that system to which he alluded. The Noble Lord well knew that they came to a stand. The l'irliament not being able to reform itself, threw itself lilts the arms of the King. With respect to the tes timony given by the Noble Lord to the services of Captaiu Ramo, if he had not thought the pension granted to him enough, he might have used his in. Inenee with Lord Bathurst to increase it. Crow the g -sterol outline of the case, he tea.. sure Lord Bathurst gave as much as he thought right. Sir J. I%IACKIN'fOSiI felt heartily rejoiced that hail delayed the few unimportant words he had tss deliver in favour of the Noble Lord's explanation, of t: e utmost importance, not merely as related to the q ,ection then before the House, hut to the general af of E trope, and to the discussion which was about t , . come on that 'sight. The Noble Lord (Lord Cam- Cereagh) had set out with the intention of contradict his Noble Friend (Loral W. Bentinek), but he toped its a few words to be able to chew that he ha i rut established the shadow of a contradiction. 114 Noble Friend %hewed that the King of Naples was obliged to abrogate the Constitution of Sicily in obe dience to the injunctions of the Congress of Vienna. The Noble bird opposite denied that ; butt lie hail forgot tea the Secret frosty which was made three days af ter the breaking up of the Congress, between Austria nail Naples t—that must flagitious nod nefarious trans action, which haunt! the King sit Naples not to intro duce any maxims of tiovernsnent into his policy ex • .-pt those of Austria. This Secret Treaty was to do away all that the British hail established—such was ti.e harmony, good understanding, honesty, and sin ► erity of these contracts, which were nsade for the good of Eurape. With respect to the next part of the Noble Lord's explanation, he must confess that it ra ts.er struck bias as suspicions that the Noble Lord should think the Neapolitan Liovernment more proper THE t. to consult with respect to the ser vieha of Capt. Reim. thin the distinguished Reitisia Comsat:delta in Sicily. His Noble Friend had given them tato importanf points of information. He had told them, in the Grit place, that Captain Romeo hail deserved well of the English Government a and shoo that the Neapo litan Government entertained strong comity towards all those who had been connected with the English. The Neapolitan Government therefore was the lost quarter to apyly to for Captain Romeo's character. After that individual stated that he had been ruined in the service, he thought it would not be creditable to the character of the country, if the moat ample attention were not paid to his claim. They were told that one singular item was 1,400/. for the mistress of the French General. He should like to see the account, fits order to form any judgment upon this. It might then appear to have been extortion, or the singularity 'of the statement might arise from the imperfect knowledge which he knew Captain Romeo ball of the English and French lanotagrs. But he mast repress his astoodahment at the conduct of the Noble Lord, who selird upon a mistranslation, pro. bablr, of hia statement, to raise a laugh against this unfortunate: individual, who , it appeared, had been ruined in this service . Ile did too: know for what Juliet this Romeo had made the advance in question, hat the matter was not to be treated in the light war the Noble Lord seemed inclined to do. As the Noble Lord hail done every tfiing - in his r ower to insinuate awav the case of this individual. be should not hare done his sleety towarda.public justice, or to this enfortanate gentleman, if hr lead not said what he had in support of the Petition.—(Bear.) Lord CAS FLEREAGH regretted the necessity he was under of troubling the house so often ; hut he really felt himself called npon to put the lion. and Learned Gentleman right, who had mianneleratood him in so aSttilliShing a manner. lie represented him (Lord Castlereagh) as having ap p lied 4 to the Neapoli tan liovet mnent to know what r pensation iw ought to give Capt. Romeo. He never hail said any such thing. He said that he had applied through the British Minister at that Court to know upon what grounds Capt. Romeo was exiled—to ascertain whe ther it was fontoled on any resentment excited on account of that rrson's connection with the British formerly. With respect to the Hon. anii Learned Gen tlemen's remark, on the subject of the Secret Treaty, he well knew that the Treaty be :abided to, Was Sign ed in June, 11115: and it appeared to him very a lear, that Austria having com i nered Murat, is as entitled to make a treaty with the. King of Naples to whom she gave the Crown. This treaty could have no connec tion with the C . /ingress of Vienna, because it was not executed till one month after that Congress broke up. Lord W. BENTINCK asked whether the Petitioner had been banished from Naples ? Lord CASTLEREAGH said, be understood that the Petitioner lead been in confinement, and had escaped from prison. Lord W. BENTINCK said, that as the Noble Lord seemed to doubt the existence of a di/11111101i io which he had before alluded, he would read a copy of it to the House. It was dated Dec. ISI9, and was to the following effect :—That Isis Majesty, feeling himself bound to ratify the .tots of the Congress of Views*, he reignited the kingdom of Sicily with the kingdom of Naples, whirls were in future to form one th/s e ns. ment.--(Hear, hear.) Lord CASTLER EACH said, that he nevei saw that document. He had lately heard of a Proclamation said to have been from the King—that Proclamation was a rank forgery. Ile was inclined to think that the document just read was of the same deseription. Lord A. HAMILTON said, that justice. and what was sine to the national character, called npon the !louse to attend to the case of the Petitioner ; lee had been most unfairly dealt with, and most severely. lie had been imprisoned for live months. nail was fed on bread and water during that time: he had suffered for his veal and for his set vices to England. lii' contlnct was approved of : Ilia merits attested by t h e most eli•- tingnished officers of the British army. It was the duty of that lions'. to see 01'0 hail suf fered in their service, should not be allowed to gro from their liar without redress. Mr. A BERCIO 01111 E said, that if be nnolerstooel the Noble faun, lie dill not attempt to contradirt his Hon. and Learned Friend (Sir J. 31ackintosh) ; on the contrary, his answer went to confirm the statement 14 his Hon. and Learned Friend. His lion. an/I Learned Friend did not say that the Neapolitan Government acted under the order,' of the Csow:ress of Vienna, lint in consetvence sit the Secret Treaty entered into between Austria and Naples, which contronled the power of the latter, and placed its Laws and Consti tution at the disposal of a foreign power. It was i on _ noeiliately after the shaman, treaty that the Procla mation of the King of Naples was issued, Lord CASTLEREAGH said, that there was no thing in the Treaty of Vienna whirls went to hind np the bands of Austria, so as to prevent her from enter ing into a separate Treaty with any partienlar power. All he meant to sac was, that such Trertv had no con nexion with Ilse Treaty of Vienna. Mr. HUME, in rrp!v, stated, that the Noble Lord opposite had mis-stated the fact saloon Ise said, that Capt. Romeo escaped front prison, as Io sou that °erasion be lead been transported by an order from the King of \Aides, roontorsigned li v th e Consul, Mr. Lee, its a Swedish vessel to rrvpt. With regard to the it had been paid es a bribe to the mistress of the French General, to proenre his escape. With respect too the lenztli of tint" of his claim, how could it be otherwise, when he was two veal< and a half in getting to England, and was then ten months before he could get au answer. The Petition having been brought np, Lord CASTLEREAGH observed, that the services of Capt. Ronteo were perfumed in Ist/Ps and I sin , . The British army temained in occupation till 1515, during the whole of wl:iels period these claims might have been presented for investigation.—The Petition was then read, and ordered to be printed. NAPLES. _ Sir It. WILSON brletl . vstatrd the object of the mo tion he had given notice of fur this day. In a letter which he had good reason to know passed lwtween Sir Wm. Al'ourt and the Neapolitan Minister fur Foreign Affairs, relative to the instruction+ given to the t ominander of a sqnailron in the Neapolitan seas, be coneei• ed that principles were laid down incompa tible with the law of nations, and he therefore thought it his duty to bring it under the attention of that MAN. 11041 k The paragraph in Sir Wm. A'Court's letter to which he particularly wished to direct the attention of *e Reuse was, where, after stating the intention of the British Government to maintain a strict neutrality he went on to say, '6 it will interfere in no way with the affairs of ibis country, except in such way as in terference may be rendered necessary by personal in sults tar injury being of f ered to the King or the Royal Family." The letter ailded—` . the undersigned flat ! tees himself that nothing will occur to interrupt the peaceful dispositions of the two countries." This re servation the Nouse would remark came very well. whilst we haft a squadwa to gnard the sea line, whilst the Austrians attacked the land line, that being the eery tissue when the Royal Family would be most likely to meet with insult, if they did not conduct themselves properly. A convention having ensued between two of the personages assisting at the late conferences at Trappau, one of whom was the first Minister of one of the leading persecuting powers, in which the possibility of a change of Ministry taking place in this country was discussed, one of the parties said, that should any thing of the kind take place, it was resolved by the Allied Powers to treat Enema in the same way as Naples. Upon its being remarked that that would be found difficult, since Napoleon had in vain attempted it, it was re plied that the course would be to treat it as a pesti ferous nation, by restraining the intercourse of all other nations with her. The Noble Lord opposite seemed to think this impossible, but many things had happened in these days which were Go:ight impossi ble. Leaving this topic, be must observe that this kind of menacing neutrality was more calculated to ex asperate the nation against the Ro)al Family than otherwise, as they appeared to he the property of a foreign nation rather than belonging to their own country. The conduct of Mr. Pitt, in 1792, an autho rity fur which the noble Lord might be supposed to have some respect, was widely lilferent towards the French nation from that pursued by the present 6o ' vent:swot towards the people of Naples. He, while anxious to interfere in behalf of the King. was careful I to avoid every thing that might give offence to the French Government, and anxious to the last to leave an opening for communicating with the French Con ! vention. Row, indeed, could he art otherwise? he who was the representative of a people, who, before a regular tribunal, hail adjudged one Soveredgn to die (he believed few now denied the justice of 'lint sentence if they lamented that the execution bat taken place,) I anal expelled another Monarch from the throne, In con sequence of which the house of Brunswick had teigned in England ! lie did not see that the people of Naples ought to be viewed as hostile to the. King. For belseuld not believe the Allied Monarchs, when they represented hint to have declared against the Constitution at Lay barb, which he had sworn to support while at Naples. The documents called for ought to be produced, that it might be known what was the real character of our neu trality. This country ought to have expressed strong abhorrence at the prinziples laid down by the Allies. This became more necessary, when it was remembered what was the whole charge against the people of Naples. When it was objected to them that they had adopted the Spanish Constitution, he would ask the Noble Lord if the King of Naples hail not previously subscribed to the Spanish Constitution, in order to secure the succession to the Crown of Spain. lie begged to ask what was the course of the Spanish Constitution ? Had it not been working in Spain for eighteen months without producing any consequences dangerous to other States, anal lied it produced any evil effects since it had been in operation in Naples? lie vindicated the priceiples of the Carbonart at considerable length, and though far front defending the assassinations that hail taken place, he could not view them but as thenatural rest:lmola despotic system. I tecosumented un the ambition of Austria,and maintained that permanent military occupation of Naples as a fete tic bout was her object, and hall beets so for years, anal he was confident that she would not easily relinquish the hop? of obtain ing au establishment in the Southern part of Italy. lie described Austria to have extorted the sum of five millions yearly Prow Naples, and declared it to be his opinion that the Noble Lord ought to hate interfered as soon as he hail read the Austrian Declaration, and de clared that nothing should induce hint to suffer the nil litany occupation of Naples to take place. lie exulted in the situation In which the Austrian army was placed by the advance of the Piedinontese trop; s. and calcula ting on its probable destruction, considered the knell of despotism tea have sounded. For this coontry, though hr felt for ire embarrassments, yet he should be ashamed of his countrymen it he felt not avowed that they would submit to male any sacrifice in such a reuse, to miti• gate the misfortune% of others who were stiffering in the cause of liberty. lie eulogised the conduct of the Prince Regent of Naples, and linialted by moving an Address to his Majesty, raying that he svoithi he gr.*. citmaly pleased to givc directions that there shottill be laird before the lio n ise a copy of a Letter, 'latest Feb. ll.' P+2l. from Sir W. A'Court to the Neapolitan Minister for Foreign Affair.; together with a copy of any Itt 411111e1 Mita sent out by Government, on whirls the same was founded. Lord CASTLERFAGII, in rising to answer thin call of the Gallant General, disclaimed all intention of following him through the various subjects which his speech embraced, hut said he would confine himself, in the first place, to the comments which were made up the circular letter—the object of tile Gallant Ge neral's motion. lie would not toilets upon the ques tion, tit' whether the liallant lieneral's information was or was not correct upon those interesting priv:tte con versations which seemed to have such a Oman for hint. Neither was he a follower of Isis &whines of alarm ; his faith Wa% rather weak in those prophetic visions which the Gallant General opened with so lintels satis faction to himself. but which he (Lord C.). like cer tain other prophecies, did not take for (love' truth.— As to the production of the letter front Sir W. A'Cittirt to the Duke of Hallo, the tiallaiit General might to have stated some practical reasons for producing it.— For if the only object was to discuss the truce itself, that might have ben alone with great ease, without motion at all ; as hr (Lord Castlereagh) was ready to admit that the letter which appeared some weeks ago in the newsp•ipers was a correct copy of it. lir was bound to assume, then, dial the object was not to ob tain information it hich might be hail Sal easily else where ; and what then was the object of this motion ": The gallant General could not, nor retold any one, subset to the humane principle of protecting a helpless Royal Family from insult and injury.—(ilear.)—He (Lord C.) however, protested most strongly against the construetion put on these words, that they had reference to any political changes porde in the Consti• ttstion of Naples, which slid not endanger tite safety of the ltuyal Family, but tendril to lessen their This was nut the sense in which this letter was written. it was dictated by a mere spirit of lonnanity towards the weak or oppressed. With tepid to the , . too extensive iliseretUnotnieutivnernotntr.llsainnitswtei l Ministe r at, be vrondereti any gt nt stittition di.l nut know there we re ti.: sia,ees which it was necessary to give M 41 inistve s 4, 1 .r siderable discretion. in t could that discretion be e nt ruste. ,l o , er k_ s w i li l l .truer than those of Sir W. ATourt, and Gra h a m . 4 Sir who was at the bead of the naval department ;—.(d. —With regard to the question of genera l i w ; he complained that the gallant General h ad e erle as , " ; hi al :d . t ee' , s it e r l , g n i n e r t i .:l 7 : t o o x i b i , p Y , who n n e : d e e . tv i : was srailtettCrrrtcl.stre ence w h.r.ll::;:ae_ tk 1792; but they doubted whetlimiorrdsuiewhisti,attatterfffek,,ir would be beneficial to the object ..whielt it ea s - to serve. The case of N a pl e s, h owever, was dii ..._ 11e44 The circular of Slr W. ATonrt, derlared n r et r ir wi the broadest terms. In 1792, posed that a A l orrilie messenger should de fed two . Court of France, to express our opinions Go b t strictions on the King's person ; but fur th e r tsaaw l alestailv stated, this proposition was not adupt e t y r again denied that the document was directed u any new ch toges in the Government of Napl ec i.. • Noble Lord then censured in strong terms tittle* cation which the gallant General cute red 4 1 , 4 . the ptineiples of the Carhonari.—(ilear. duo It was not in this stage of the lousiness fie H ew should think it necessary, by its iahrfereere, relieve his Majesty's Government form all mows bility as to the consequences of the tome tarl i2 sued. If calamitous circumstances shook pr. Government was answerable for such eir but hr could not think that was the time to rs ti the note, nith a view to examine into the limitable in the instructions to Sir %V. A'Conrt. If any people on the face of the earth more than another in guarding agtinst any stain character from any offensive conduct ir Royal Family, the Neapolitans were that the people of Naples were not dissatistied colmisunication made by the British They thanked Sir William A'Court far proved of the neutrality which this it would maintain. But if the Gallant that that measure resulted from any power with the Congress of Troppan, tl firer was greatly deceived, for before the that Congress those orders were issued of the strictest neutrality, and Sir W. authority 14, make them public. Sir W, not conceal his instructions, but commte freely, and received no re tttttt istrance from litan Government. At the issue of the hi the Allied Sovereigns, it was necessary Hain A'Court should furnish the Duke . a note corresponding with his instructions, that the latter might inform his Government termination of the British Government. tion 11":13 issued to the British Minister with any knowledge of the Allied Powers, before they met at Troppau. He no licaitatioo in informing the House, the A'Court and Sir Graham Moore had remove the Royal Family if any breach In that case, Sir Graham Moore was protect them from every species of instil but those orders were properly guarded tv's Ministers. Whatever results miel. Ike differences between Naples *nil the reigns, they could not throw any _ Majesty's Ministers, u ho were 00 parties lions of the Congress at Troppau or of what had been done, Ministers were aril fur themselves without any concert wit whatever grew out of the measures t part of the Allied Powers, this culotte: responsible. This country dill not hrc their polities. With respect to the ilk the Gallant and Hon. Gentleman hail wade of Austria being for the nltintate occupat. he seemed to forget that Austria had possession sat plus at a former period, and yet did nit attempt too propriate and annex it to tier own dominions that great and memorable war which hail been rarns on for the preservation of the rights and lihertios all Europe, Austria had conquered the kityleste Naples, au.l instead of laving claim to it 1! right of conquest, which might be ileend good titre, she left it and sent away • half of her army, and kept the tart hi ll only for the preservation of Naples, while at the' time she allowed the army of Murat to At that time Austria did not even think of herself of Naples. Us (laird Castlereaeh)i. a part of the Emperor of Austria's lets 'r to the of Naples. in which lie said that his army nasio session of Naples, for his (the King of N! terest ; and as soon as he could trust to his his (the Emperor's) General had orders to from Naples in ten days after. The gallant as an aarieirs caride, has told the house of the ciples of the Carbonari, and took pains to their system, which was calculated to bring on every country. But he (Lord Castlereagh) secret sects and conspiracies of every kind and destructive of libertv.---(lleart hear.) standing the commendation of the gallant G. Constitution and laws of this country authorise' to denounce and condemn all such secret It was in the origin and nudism of all such . to destroy all the governments in Italy, and M. different states of it into one solid mats. He participate in the enthusiasm of the Gallot arid he would again repeat that he cum hl nut.. designs of the Allied Powers stay i titeo tion uf ing their territories. The Noble Lord co .ed..oo;' derlairing that it was his opinion, that tilt Powers did not mean t.• violate any of the fu witich they had entered with this country. Mr. A'CIn:ILT observed that the Dote of hi' titre, Sir Win. A'Court, was rereited hy the I .artit of Naples each noutingled approkitiout the people had received Sir William himself wt grea•est enthusiasm. Mr. C. SON supporte. l the motion. 'I he lion. Air. WARD trusted that on mitt Ministers would adhere t o the resolo:iou t.eul • a vowed of maintaining a stric t neutrality. " have been better had Englau d takea a n ,aut and assmaral a louder and mo re drettlei condole. could be OMIT objectio nable than that tism.—lf rt the Neapolitans were denied tiler wthaiss p u nned —" u thaPta.uifitislishlcokiaugidinbeths: r i tsr imPru i rr o t '4.11 ,411111.1.111 `changint tl oar aneestoi change of d, bt the &open) tablishment tended his s of the world jurists say, pleased,--w a military d the slow del risen to its and diicali Which they the revoluti But the qv choose a CO If Aust fetch the tapirs, wh tuade !laves the Noble 1 other social but the bes that society the King of rieties. Bi were suppre irraion in Who were limit, parth States of E , to receive a Lord J. I opposite, ' the part of pusEession I Lord CA Lim, that I those whit) adherence Mr. CM he was plac Lions on thi himself ano to justify t tish Anibal filled a situ were issued sFasibilitj those orde r lity, sod the countr) were given ing a strict Allied. Nos word only, inait.tain instruction , tion of the sisters, nco between N ieneral, in the conduce France. 1 position wbihl el n ea o t j *m ed with cau it did nut % city of Prri Seise, they to the prop ticable. 'I same prop Royal Fro of enforcii gentlemen employed - other a thanked, greatest r spect to the dehai Majesty's 9f sitting though he a decided the speech its object us, from tl I ialllnt tit gociytion in a Ada' in the cow the loonier wig not th The quest peace or I No one en (Mr. rann was not on to others t blessed. that libert sag to the I rertaialv t they haa c approve tl that cool c could View hind* fool Whatever the pap er might feel state of :V pruesseetlei declare th %volt; he anti they nareflectil to Carry ill tere..t. of wuntlerittp verge of to unfurl decided. House to t sr this. to diseuas aad slaves esaroplal of tMl► as a war far terwards EMil= irt. II t h eft% h snore inter* my ' , lain ea li r net tower& thi, that people. Ili is•atistied with si ish Ambassador.— trt for it, Il i 4 , conntry lant ( H any contumely inu, the initiate. ore the mein/ witted in the* iir W. A'Caert iir W. 41:nr to ommunietved Iles re from the kap 'the lira Arnim wiry that * Juice the 04114 'tractions, is eek /vernutent dike tent. That Drive sister at Nap!" d Powers, bet He (Lord C.) use, that Sir t had inst raciest trench should tee'. was authorni it f in,nit ;sad tiny. rattled by hie 60 4 might pow net' Intl the OW liwv r esponsibility ta arties to the driller, Dr of Layloach. Ie .re acting on gnel L , rt With others: el u res adopted es it, /untry e a not Jt become a part! hr discovery sin ad made of the tire ocvnitation of NO v.td uoseession ile at ?Ix sane b e i reogaill'u t of rosessin. 4 3 ) rcrolleries 1 to the h* 1•V lIIS in r If Nlpies'Y Iris schist: 3 to within` 'Mint Ono. e or the F r. tut to etP 6 • tf) ring bier s • e s gli) that , Intl d.. g er tr.) Noli: or I teneesl" u th u risod . h . et ri soto* *. t ch ettloli rkcw ' 7 , o wl Iwo ii 4 - H e o ddly' allaut Bever. not tra:e ill 11 '‘ lion of ear''' . co ndo lel b' at fa 04, the treaties I°"' 3y. ii „ ,t r of hi' ' Iry the 1.10.1 r .Otion, 3fifl 0 nisei( oilth t% Ile m otien• .„ )11 this se 3.tr_ t o :iou to .1 111 . , J itr . It 1047 II • A; her coo; tiler tole. ... k lion tha t .1.14. Pli