The Statesman. — London, England, 1823-05-27 00:00:00

opinion that a certain act' ought not to be done. The question related to the dressing of the statue ; this was prior to the Kind's visit to Ireland. By Colonel BARRY.—In no part of the Orange In stitution was there any thing hostile to any class of his Majesty's subjects. Latterly Roman Catholics had taken offence at Orange Lodges ; and some dissatisfaction ex isted in Ireland on that account. Mr. HIJ%IE desired to ask the purport of the scriptu ral passages which were read. (Cries of " No, no. ) Ile insisted that he had a right to put the question. The purport had not yet been asked. It was possilde tbs• a proposal tnight be read to hang' and destroy all .he Ro man Catholics. Since the truth was refused, be had a right to assume that such was the case; and, upon his conscience, he believed that it was. Mr. ti. DAWSON denied that there was any desire in that (the ministerial) side of the Howe to veil the pro ceedings of the Orangemen. No far W. 13 lie trout being of the opinions of gentlemen opposite, that were it not for the oath, lie would become an Orangeman to-morro,v. To them the country most ultimately look for the pre /creation of Ireland, arid he would expose him.elf, bat for the reason+ which he bad stated, to all the Wormy an d calumny thrownomos Orangemen by gentlemen oppo cite. lie admired both the principles and the conduct of Orangemen. lie defied gentlemen opposite to show one fact which could tlirew disgrace on that body. He defied them to mention any thing to their,discredii. Sir A.B. King w is a permit of the highest respectability. Mr. V. FTI ZtIERA LI) complained of the extremes to which two Honourable Members had gone in the heat of argument; Elie one arrogating an exclusive feeling of loyalty on behalf of one party, and the other attributing to Orangemen universally a wish to hang the Catholics. He trusted that the If inourable Gentletnan who hail put the question (Mr. ['now) would see the propriety of withdrao kg tr. Sir JOHN NEWPORT deprecated the lengoage which they had its: beard, which was the more fearful • as coming from an offi, ial character (‘lr. Dawson). claiming •Nelusive loyalty to the Orangemen. If the Hon. Gentleman meant to persuade his Majesty's Go vernment that six nut of the seven millions of the pope latiun of Ireland were unworthy of being trusted with the defence of their country, and one million alone was loyal, he persuaded theta to rest on an incompetent, frail, red, which would lead them to their ruin. The Hun. Alember also in his z-al, thought tit to IL •ke the pane gyric of the pure Corporation of [Minn, forgetting that the contrary was on record in the Report of the Comenissioners of [mini ry, and of a Committee op stairs. Mr. Secretary PEEL begged to feudist! the Floam that they were acting judicially. With respect to Cie question put to the wit ness, it was palpably the same which the Committee had decided over and over again should not be put. Mr. HUME declared it as Lis opinion, that so far from the Orangemen beiug loud, there would he no peace its Ireland mail the cntiiii institution w.s destroyed. Ha felt it his duty to press this question, and he would take the sense of the House npou it. Mr. GRATTAN was astonished to hoar a Minister for Ireland (Mr. Dawson), express himself its favour of the Orange system; and it a. as his firm coovietion that Motto would never be any peace in Ireland until it was deco away. The Committee then divided on the question whither the last question should be put, which was derided in the regale', the numbers being—Fer Ilse putting of the question, 77 ; Agaie:st it, 131.—Majority, 51. The witness sees then called in, and the examination resumed by Mr. If USIE. Does that part of the Uhl Testanteut which read to Orangemen on their a!niiasior, or afterwards, expre.s any !imbricate of hostility on the part of the Israelites to env other nation ?-1 do not think to. Are rati sure that there are no such sentiments con rained in those pa.sagi s? —I am. Are the passages taboo from Scripture such as incul cate peace and goo'ho ill to men in general ? On the motion cf Mr. IVETHERELL, the witness was ordered to u illtd raw, and the Honourable and Learn ed Gentleman objected to the Idle of examination as of too general a nature. Mr. If I:31E thought it strange that the Ilonourahle and Learned Gentleman should allow a general question • to he put with reaped to hostili y, and should object to its being put with trivet to peace. Mr. SCARLEI"I defended the propriety of putting the question. Lord CHANROTIIINE oppoarol it. Mr. ELLICE thought it stood! be more manly in the Right Honourable Gentleman to move for the postpone setut of the inquiry altogether, than to shackle and con fine it in such a wanner as to prevent any possible ad yantage to t he. n t ey. Mr. PEEL appealed to the House whether such goes lions as had been objected to, were not trifling with its time. The opinion of the House hail been already pro nounced on the subject, awd it was too much for an Hon. Gentleman, noon coming down from his dinner, to insist on the propriety of putting questions relative to the to kens and symbols of the institution. Mr. ELLICE wished to inform the Right Honourable • Gentleman that he was as constant to his place that Light as the Right • Hon. Gentleman himself, and had voted on the two divisions. His Majesty's Government seemed to throw every obstacle in the way of neces sary questions, butt t h is was only a pert of that system of comp' omi•e by which they were associated. It was now plain that no beneficial result could fol low from the manner in which the investigation was conducted. Mr. SCA RLETT was anxious to know what objection his Majesty's Nlieilters could have to the truth wining ont ? aid there certainly seas a party in the House deter mined to support the witness. Mr. JONES said, that front the evidence, it appeared the charge preferred agair st the Attorney General for drel.nd tiould nut atter!), and therefore he should op. pose the lowlier prol roes of the inquiry. Ali:. U. HEN V E rase to order. lie thought the Ho • ert.ra:.le and Learned Member was prematurely slamming op Ire eau.. S rJ. YORKE said he would gladly vote for the tree run of u.lourning the hunt. r inquiry, %%hick he hod hoped tht lion. Member for Carnnrvon was zoiag to propose in •a brief speech. He w•ts of opinion, that unless the wit-' nen at the bar answered the questions, be he who he may, ILO come what would, he should be committed to New tat,. Mr. JONES then moved, as an amendment, that the chsirmau be ordered to report progress, and ask leave to si again that day sit months. t Mr. JOHN SMITH espressei. his disappointment at the isqu ry. He had indeed enteritined great hopes ; for whre The Right Hon. Gent:emen opposite had occtyieit a higa si tioalou in the Government. lie still !top it in it a .B*e goo 4 *arid re.ult from the inquiry. He wns resolved to vote siainst the amendment, and would prosecute the inquiry to long as there was the slightest possiLi.ity of any good rcsu4t. A MEMBER, whose name we could not learn, said he Wa s not at all disappointed by the courne the inquiry had t„k•n. The sootier it wee buried L. oblivion the b. tier. Mr. Secretary CANNING said he was, in the beginning, imposed to the inquiry, being of opinion that It wtolld not fire out satisfactory. On the present question he was re sa:vtd to give no vote. *Mooed BARRY said, if the Honourable Haronetwere flaw voted out of the Chair, he should concur in the war , ton. Hut if it were intended to found any ulterior pro visaing' on the evidence already before the House, i. Amnia go on with the examination of his witnesses te the 'aid. Although he antlered great fatigue from the it: T•hry, he could not avoid proceeding, rather than idiom a THE ST, vote of censure on the conduct of the Sheriff to be pro posed upon , the minutes alreadytakefs. After a few words from Mr. DALY and Colonel BAR RY. i n explanation, Mr. CALCRAPT said, whatever course thp . House might now adopt, it could preclude any Member from submitting a motion upon the evidence before the House; I and, therefore, if the Right Honourable Oentlemen (Colonel Barry) had more with to examine, he ought to proceed. Let him not think the ease could rest here. He (%tr. Calcraft) wonld nor at present give any decision, and trusted he should not he driven to do so without flue enn•ideration. The determination of the Right lion. Gentleman opposite (Mr. Canning) appeared to him most extraordinary for any Minister to take. He was hound to make up his mind on the point before the 'lnoue. He said that we found ourselves exactly in the situation he predicted; but although the Right Hon. Secretary might be en excellent prophet, he (Mr. C.) would defy anyone to say that most important information had not been derived from the inquiry. Enough had been obtained to spew that that revision was necessary. He should further omose the amendment, if it tended to shut out evidence in defence of the SherUl. Mr. CANNING explained. Mr. ELLICE said he would oppose the amendment. After a few words from Mr. JONES, Sir J. NEWPORT rose to observe, that u the pre sent investigation had originated with the Hon. Baronet, the Member for Westminister, who was not now in his place owing to indisposition, the case ought not to be closed without his consent. Iv! Mr. CANNING entirelyre liv the opinion of the Right Hon. Baronet (Sir rt)1011e thought while either side might have evil t produce the inquiry shook! proceed. Mr. G. HP.NNIET said the Investigation had fully an swered his expectations ; all parties hail acted just as he ex pected and wished. It appeared from the evidence of one of the witnesses, a Pollee Magistrate (Major SW), that a great deal of tampering existed In lrehnd, which world not be to lerated in this country. With re.pect to the Sheriff of Dah lia, the practice of striking Juries evidently called for car tection. Alio with respezt to that House, the investigation fully displayed the system which was at work both within and without it. The House then divided on Mr. Jones's Amendment, when the numbers were.— For it, 42 Igainst it, 173—Nlajotity. 131. On re•entering the Gal:erv, we found Sir J. YORKE on his legs. deploring the situation of Ireland. Mr. 8. WORTLEY explained. Sir R. HERON then read the last Question proposed by Mr. Hume to the witness, 'when Mr. BENNF.T rose, and proposed, that the Chairman re port pro4ress to-morrow. After mme discussion as to the course to be adopted on re suming 41 quiry, it was ordered that the Chairman report progress, and obtain leave to sit again this day. On the Motion of Lord CRANBOURNE the second reading of the Sale of Game Bill was postponed to Monday. Tie Committee, un the unlawfa I Oaths (Ireland) Bill, was postponed to Friday. The other orders of the day were then disposed of; and the House adjourned at one o'clo.k. COURT OF JUNO'S BENCH, MAY 26. ♦LLEN V. AVER AND ANOTHER. This was an action on the 57 lien. 111. c. 19, against the defendants, two inhabitants of the hundred to reco ver a compensation in damages for the destruction of a building called the hustings, destroyed by a riotous as setnbly, at the last election far Lynn, in Norfolk. The action was brought by the Mayne of that borough, who was declared as owner of the hustings. At the trial b.- fire Mr. Baron Harrow. at the last assizes for the county of Norfolk, it appeared in evidence, that at the last elec tion for Lynn, the candidates agreed amongst themselves to pay for the bustingarreeted to take the poll. After they were erected, a riot took place in the town, and they were injured by the crank and the plainti ff was pat to considerable expense in putting them into a state of repair. To recover this expense the present action was brought. At the trial two objections were taken to the p'aintiff's right to recover; first. that hustings were not a building within the meaning of the statute; and se cond, that the plaintiff could not he ecnsidereti as the owner of the hostines, and consequently cou'd not be damnified by the alleged injury. The Learned Baron saved both points, and the plaintiff had a verdict, with liberty to move to enter a nonsuit. Last term Mr. Henry Cooper moved accordingly, and obtained a rule Nisi for that purpose. Mr. STORKS and Mr. WEST now showed cause, atrl met:ivied, first, that as the words of the statute were, "any buildang hatecer," the hustings, in this case, which were fixed on the ground, came within the gene ral definition; and sword. that they must, for the pur pose of this action, be considered as the property of the Mayor. who, being returning officer, was by implica tion honed t) provide the necessary means of taking the poll at a contested election. Mr. COOPER, in support of the rule, was not heard. The Coitar were clearly of opinion that the Mayor could not he considered as the owner of the hustings, they baying been provided at the expense of the can dilates ; and without giving any decisive opinion upon the second question, made the rule absolute for entering a nonsuit. lIUGHES C. SAVOTIY.. This was an action bro ug ht by the pliiintiff, who formerly wai a soldier in the Guards, to rec.rver compensation in damages for an assault alleged to have been committed by the defendant, who Is an eminent ehemist refilling in Bond street. The damages were laid at frOUI. From the state ment of the Learned Counsel, Mr. Common B , rgealit. it ap peared that the assauit was committed at West Monkey, where the defendant has a country-house, which the pla'ntiff was hired to take care of. After evidence, had been adduced on both sides, Mr. Phillip sev. at considerable length, contended, that the impropriety of the plaintiff's conduct in leaving unprotected plate and other valuables which were in the house, and which he was hound to take care of, and his insolence to the de fendant on his return 110111 e at a late hour of the night, j , is.ified the defendant in what he had done. He trust ed the Jun• would not, by their verdict, hold out to ser vants that insolence, disobedience, and negl..t towards their masters, would be rewarded with lredvy damages. His Lordship summed itp,.and the Jury having retired for an ilium found a verdict for the plaintiff—Manages, One Shilling. The Conn of King's Bench has decided that the fur niture at Blenheim House in as vi.st-d in the trusters under tl•c i►alce of Marlborough's settlement, and could not le rAlly be &strained for assessed taxes, of ivhielt two years ~re now due. PREROGATIVE HUDSON T. FARTHING BEAUCHAMP. T'•is day. after some part of the Arches' Court business had' hern transacted. Sir d. ii Num°Lo gave sentence in the above erase ; the riiiiripal facts of which we had, during the course of last term, such frequent occasion to refer to, that it seems unnecessary to restate any part of them, on the present oc• casimi, in Wail. It will be recollected that the testatrix. au old lady of very advanced years, some time in 1819 exe cuted a deed of girt of the whole of her property to a Mr. Farthiog, a gentleman with" whom she dad become ac quainted, in the first instam e, through the circumstance of her banking with the house of Messrs. Morland and Co. — Subsequently she exec-.ted a will, confirming the deed in question, but disposing of one or two legacies to an old ser vant and executors; and a codicil, also, by which she en joined that Mr. Farthing should take upon himself the name of Beauchamp, in compliment to the memory of the testa- 'AN. tries brother, from whom the greater part of her fortune bad originally descended. Of this will. the learned Judge observed, probate was taken on the 24th of March, iddli. by Boattchanth ; but was afterwards called in on the. application of kindson, the next of kin of the dooeased, testing the validity both of th e will and the codicil. The question which the Court was to decide, therefore, vies. whether the due execution of these instruments was sulfl dently proved? To the point of testamentary capacity, and sohnd and disposing mind on the part of deceased. two witnesses had been examined, and evidence had been taken as to her hand-writing. The whole of this testimony was most Unexceptionable in its nature ; and, indeed, neither . - the fact of execution nor of testamentary capacity seemed to be denied. The plea set up by the next of kin was, generally, that deceased was In that state of mental imbecility which rendered her Incapable of doing " any act of judgment," and was, both before and at the time of executing the will, in the custody of Mr. Beauchamp; and did not publish this as her last will and testament of her own' free accord. This was the substance of the 17th article; but the. 15th article set forth, that the parties, under pretetire of obtaining the subscription of the de ceased to the power of attorney for selling out her stock, and receiving her dividends, had procured her signature to these testamentary instruments. The Court proceeded at veryconsiderible length to examine the evidence in the cause, more especially as touching these particulars —custody, incapacity, and fraudulent circumvention. It expressed its entire conviction that there was nothing in the depositions to warrant either of the imputations set up in the adverse plea ; and after taking an opportu nity to vindicate the character of the late Mr. llosier, (a partner in the house of !Borland and Co. and the gentleman by whom the instructions for the will were taken), and adverting to the very honourable and satisfactory testimony on this subject which had been Riven by the lion. Douglas Kinnaird and Sir James Graham, Bart. the Court declared itself entirely satis fied with the whole conduct and complexion of a trans action to which Mr. Hosier load lent the sanction and guarantee of his reve::tithie name and services. The learned Judge went on to discuss the conduct of Mr. Beauchamp to the dery teed ; and with this he expressed himself equally well satisfied, seeing that the conduct of that gentleman had well fulfilled all the duties of re spectful and careful attention towards the person and comforts of the testatrix, which her adoption of him ha I certainly established a claim to at his bands. Fi nally, the Court pronounced for the validity of the last will and codicil of the deceased as they had been pro pounded ; and expertise I his satisfaction at finding that .Ur. Beauchamp had contented to waive the question of costs—a measure, which, seeing that that gentleman nas not related by btu° 1 to the deceased, and that her next of kin might have very fairly imagined themselves entitled to imitate these proceeding.. the Court would } not but deem very well advised. (Floe property in this case is about 30,0001.) POSTER O. rotten. In this case also, relative to the validity of a will judg ment was likewise declared. The testator, it appeared, 'led In the c mrse of last summer, leaving upwards of 8,0901. in freehold property, and 3,00111. In person', bequeathed among a large family, by a will suddenly prepared and exe cuted, but by which hlu-salfiest son was excluded from all par tion. The deceased bad some joint property with his bro ther, and this WO was disposed of. The shiest son was pre sent 4nd heard the instremeat read over ; but the next day, when the father bad expired, the will which had been pre , pared byattnrneys named Swan and Cooke was missing, and after some search, was found thrown Into some running water on the premises torn loto small pieces. These frog• ments. when placed together, exhibited all the component parts oldie will, and the evidence of Mr. Cooke, in addition left no doubt timt it was the precise document which the lat ter had prepared, corresponding as it did with all the Instruc tions he haJ receir , d, Upon this case, then, thus far he had no difficulty; all that arose was from the apportionment of coats. If he conceived that the elder brother bad in view to defraud his young* brothers and relatives, he should not scruple as to condemning him in the full amount; but •s he was roiikstant to believe that, he !mould reserve the question of costs for further consideration. _ GILL V. GILL. Mr. GILL again appeared in propria persona in the cause pen ling between Mrs. UM and himself, and WAS informed that he could not he heard, as the Court had found it necessiry to prorounce him contomvioas. Mr. GILL who was far from being satisli-d with this authoritative information, was proceeding to state several circumstances, when Sir Jou N Nicuot, again in!errupted him, and told him he could not be heard to state auy circumstances, until fir had purged himself of the contumacy, in which he had been declared to stand. Mr. tiit,L.—" How am I to purge myself of this con tumacy?" Sir Joum Ntcunt.—" Of that you should have previ ously inquired. You have already had too much indul gence. You are engaged in a question of matrimonial law, and should have obtained instruction of the 'node of proceedine from your attorney. It is strange that one piny will mit consult legal advisers as well as the other." Alr.Gtm..—" I say I hare a right to he heard, and that the law on which you deny we the right is only a recent statute." Sir J. NICIIOL.—" I shall sit here no longer. Officers attend me. I must administer lave in conformity to my oath of office. If we do wrong there are Courts to correct our procceding."—Adjourned. POLICE. BUILDHALL.—John White, who had been that morn ing discharged from Whitecross-street prison, under the Insolvent Debtors' Act, was brought up yesterday before the Sitting' Magistrate, Mr. Alderman BRIDGES, by Mr. Spencer, the Keeper of the prison, upon a warrant which hail been lo led with him some time before, for an as upon Mr. Drown, painter and glazier, of King street terrace, Islington, the detaining creditor. Mr. Brown steed, that the prisoner owed him some rent for a house be bail occupied of his, and some time since sent him a letter, reqnesting him to come to the prison on a certain day, for the purpose of makiiq sonic arrangement with him as to the payment. Ile attended accordingly, taking a friend with him, and they were shown iiito a room where the prisoner was alone ; lie ob , jetted to ent-ring into any conversaion before a third person, and his (Mr. B.'s) friend, in consequence, with draw into the next room. Some conversation then ensu ed as to the letter which the prisoner desired to have in his own bands to look at, and having thus got possession of it he left the room ; shortly afterwards the &oar was opened, several of the prisoners were collected round it ; White pointed him out to them, and three or four o•hers, ith their feces blackened, rushed into the room, and enileav to• carry him to the trough to duck him.— Ile resisted %yid' all his strength, and his assailantsfind ing they could not take hint to the water, brought the water ta laial. Some of them held him down to the floor, while others threw buckets of water upn:r bim ashes, and every sort of filth tliey eoul,l procure. The prisoner be charged with endeavouring to shove him out of tile room to Isis assailants, and with encouraging their as saults upon him. _ . Solicitor, who attended with the prisoner, allotved the assault upon 31r. Brown, but denied that his client had at all interterfered in it,• and wished to prove by the deposition of other prisoners that it had been provoked by the abusive language and conduct of Mr. Brown Winter. Mr. Ald. Bottum tem ' however, sat l 4fied with the deposition on oath of Mr. Brown, and White Will com mitted touts,' bail fir the assault. QOE I III -4 11QUARIL—Yestertley, J. Wallace was charged with disturbing the congregation at St. Margaret's Church daring the morning service on Sunday. It ap peared, that at the moment the Clergyman commenced the sermon, the prisoner entered, and rushed up to the COMMtIOIOII table, where he began to sing " Ood Save the King;" he was instantly interrnptet, by those next to him, when he vociferated, "If you don't like that, you shall have " Rule Britannia," and he began to sing it ; the Beadle came up, and dragged him out ; be then attacked the Beadle, and conducted himself in the most violent manner, but he was overpo rered and lodged in the watchhonsr. The prisoner was committed, in default of bail, to prison. MaeinoenucH-llTRlET.—Yesterdny, G. Raylock and G. Hall were brought up before J. ItnwitNsox, Esq. A few days since the house, No. 3, Queen Cbarin'te Row, Afarylebdue, was broken into, and robbed of plate and furniture to the value of 1501. A bole was made near the handle of the street &nor, by Innis of a centre bit, large enough to introduce a pocket handkerchief tie.l in a slip knot, which catching hnld of the handle, cna• bled the depredators to enter. The two prig.vneri were observe) by a warrh.nan in the neighbo , irhoo.l, to be loitering about. He heard Iteyloek say to the other , pet soner, • All is right,' when they decamped. The cage was ordered to stand over for the atten !ance of numrrotas witnesses that were absent. LONDON hl.ltt6E FS. CORN EICILANOIC, MARK Lire. Quantifies and Prices of B ritish Corn, &c. sold and deli vered in this market, during the week ended Saturday, the 17th of May : Qrs. .0 $ . d. s. d. Wheat 8,444 for 23,609 2 2 Average .. 61 1 Barley Oats 8,385 .. 12,813 0 3 Rye Beans Pease F PRICE OF GRAIN ON BOARD 1•IIIP, AS UNDER:- R. S. Wheat, red, (old) 4S 80 Beans, small. (new) ..33 37 - white, (old) 32 00 (01d)....37 ll't ---- red (new) 4B SO - tick, (new) 33 - tine St SO - superfine ....3S 61 -- harrow (new) ..3I 31 - white (new) ..4S 32 --- (old) ..33 30 -- fine 34 80 Oats, feed 34 2R superfine . • 64 6i fine... ..... 26 24 Rye 32 36 Poland t6 Barley -- fine 32 33 Potetoe 2C V 0 -- superfine. ....37 38 --- fine 3O 31 Malt 3O 31 Scotch 32 31 fine 3S 62 Pease, hoz 3l 3t Flour, pe.. Sack 33 to -- maple 3ll 3i -- Seconds 4B 81, -- white 33 37 -- North Country 03 ts) --- boilers ..... BB 42 Pollard, fine, per yr...1(3 ;,4 Brant 23 31, Bran l9 13 SEEDS, &c. MotieLY, May 23.—We have very little alteration to no tice. Rapeseed hardly maintains our quotations.. Canary Seed is worth as. ; but Linseed is dull and lowor. MEAT. SMITHFIELD, mosetv, MIT 96. Prices returned by the Clerk of the Market. PER IT.OTSPOUNDb(ALIV - 11.) S. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. Veal 4 4 to 5 0 Beef. 3 4 to 4 tl Pork 0 Ito Mutton 0 d 0 Lamb 4 10 5 td CATTLE AT MILDEST THIS DAY. Beasts, 10370; Calves, 230 ; Sheep, 10,920 ; Pigs, 303. )C ERG ATE IIkIIRET, MONDAY, KAT 23. , PER ST.OI , 8 NM SaS (DE113.) s. d. S. (1. a. d. a. d. Veal S oto 3 0 Reef 3 0 to 3 10 Pork ..i 8 4 S Mutton.. ..... .3 4 4 4 Lamb .. 4 0 3 t; PRICE OF BREAD. The erica of the 4tb. Loaf is state.' at lOtli by the fig. priced Bakers. H AND STRAW. Est Loam. trifxriet.o—Hay. ads. Od. to 84s. Od.--11traw, 46g. 01. to 30s._04.—Clover. 80s. Od.to 90s. 01. ST. JAMT.S . S.—Hai'. Od. to 90's. Od.—Strasr, 309. 01. to 575. Od.—Ulover, Ms. 01. to OW. Od. Vl7urrEcnApst..-11sy, 70s. Od. to 905.0d.—Straw', ( 14. to Sis. SOs. 4. 1 / 4 1. to 96i. Ocl. PRICE or HOPS. ree Cwr. IN TII6 BOROUGII. MOVDAY, MAY 26.—There has' been more done in llols last week. and bags and pockets may be stated 3t. to dearer. The accounts state consider Able damage by and in many places the boles come very weak and unkind; y. TALLOW. &C. PER Cwr. RussiaCandle,yellow, IL. I ts.o to 11/. —s.—Ditto. Siberia, It. 135.t0 0/. IN.—Ditto, Soap, It. I Is. to 0/. Os.—Arch It. 12s. tout. Os.—Town Tallow, 21.—s. to 01. Rest Stuff, IL tis to 01. °J.—Rough ditto, 0/. ISJ. to 01. (h.— Grates 10s. to Os.—Good Dregs, 0/. ()J.—Seep, London yel low, 31. 14s. to 01. Os.—Do. mottled, 41. 4s.—Do. curd, .14. (IL—Do. soft, 0/ Os.—Starch, English, 01. Os. Pima OP RAW FAT, per stone of Sibs.—Price, by Tallow (as stated by the Tallow Melters), 2s. 2d. POT .• 'OE9. SPITALFIZILDC. per Ton. 10 to 4, 10 Middlings 2 0 to 2 3 Chats 1 10 to 0 0 Common Red 0 0 to 0 0 Ouionsos. Od. to Gs.od. per h. . _ BOROUGH. per Toll. Ware S 3 ' 0 to 4 10 Middlings.• 0 to 2 Id Chats -__ 20to 0 t) _ _ _ _ . Common Red... 2 15 to 3 to Onions 05.0.1. to (k• 01. 0.r.. COAL MARKET , MAY 26. Ships at Market. Ships Sold. Price. ni Newcastle I ti 335. Oct. to .P.:. 01. 5 Sunderland 3 Us. Oct. to 421. 0.:. I Scotch Coal 1 Culm I 3-101. Ftne.—At one o'clock on Sunday afternoon, a fire broke out in an uneenaieed house. is Holloway-place, Holloway. The stars, ng, , and a considerable part of the interior were destroyed before the flames were subdued. It is supposed the lire communicated from the flue of a neiehhouring chimney. The Englishman," of Sunday last, May 25th. Is r-- printed. and will be kept on Sale all this week. It contains the fullest particulars of the Fight, with a Memoir of Sprin,„: and Nettie; the previous Arrangements; Arrival of the Mel at Hinchley Downs; the Ring; the Eight Rounds. Ac count of a Second Battle, between Hampshire Pope and Bristol Parsons. The whole making Five of the English man Polio Columns. No Advertisements whatever are in serted ih The Englishman Sunday Newspaper, which i large Folio Journal of Twenty Columns, of the same size as The Observer. It is regularly published every Sunday morning, at the early hour of four o'clock. at Messrs. Smith's, 192. Strain'', London. The price of The Engliih man is Sevempeoce. ELEGANT GLASSES, FURNITURE. Ste.—The Nobility and Gentrymre invited to inspect the Ware-rooms ofCooper and Son' 93, Bishopsgst&st.- ithin. where it exhibited an assort I meat of new end se-ond-hand Plate Glasses, admi Ably suit ed to every description of Drawing or Dining-rooms. The prices arc just reduced 40 per cent. on Plates measuring 100 inches by U. and upwards ; and on those of smaller di mensions the alteration will he found equally important.— The extensive preference given to this Establishment is thankfully acknowledged by the Proprietors, who, in their endeavours to evince their gratitude, by manufaeturingarti cies in a superior manner, at prices suite, eto tne times. hope to merit a continuance of public support. In the fur niture department, is comprised every new and elecant at Bele of Upholstery, Cabinet, and Chair Work, regulate) up on such a -pale of economy, as to demand and ensure the pa tronage of rank and fashion. AL• the iced ; its is 11 sea hos iinlY t be' stet; lea" IA of