The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-05-26 00:00:00

iv 1 r ff .LAN" INTELLIGENCE. CourT OF KING'S BENCII, li r tmenursli. MA% 26. GRAY AND CO. V. AIIkAIA. This was an action by the proprietors of the Old Original Countion Stage-roach from London to Wind sor, t.i rec..ver from the defendant, their servant, and the driver of that roach, the SIMI of -127/. being the amount of datnares and rims which they were com pelled to pay in an action brought against them by a passenger named Hewitt, who bad sustained a consi derable injury from the overturning of the coach, in consequence of the alleged carelessness and negligence of the defendan•. The plaintiffs' case was COilducted by Mr. SCARLETT, UVIINEY, and Mr. W. H. TAVNTCN ; and the de. Unelant's by the SoLterron-Oexaeat, Mr. MARKYATT, 11111(1 Mr. CIouLPURNE. SCARLETT. in stating the plaintiffs' case, ex pressed his personal satisfaction that his clients had brought this action ; and he was convinced that if such actions were more numerous the public would be bet ter protected against the negligence of persons in the situation of the defendant. Whether any moral blame was imputable to the defendant or nut was a matter net necessary to inquiet. into ; but of this he was cer tain, that the plaintiffs were clearly entitled to recover in this action. he fol!owing case was proved on the part of the plaintiffs :—At the swings in this Court in February last yea-, an action was brought by a lady named Hewitt against the plaintiffs, to recover a compensation in damages from them, as owners of the Old Windsor Coach, fur a severe injury she had sustained by being overturned in that coach in the preceding month of August, on her way to Windsor, in consequence of the alleged negligence of the coachman. Ihe Jury on that occasion found a verdict against the plaintiffs, and damages to the amount of 30W. which. added to the costs of the action on both sides, amounted to -127/., which the plaintiffs were compelled to pay. Ihe coach in question starts from the 'Bolt-in-1 un Inn, Fleet street, where it is the practice of the proprietors to book half the passengers which they are allowed by law to carry, and the remainder at the White Horse Cellar, Piccadilly. The coach was calculated to carry six insides itid twelve outsides, according to law, by which the number of the latter however was limited to ten when luggage is placed on the roof. In the month of August, ISIS, the coach left London, but there was no distinct proof given of the number of pr , s.engers then in and upon the coach. It was proved, however, that at the time of the accident there were 16 outside passengers, inclusive of the coachman, and that upon the roof was placed a hamper nearly three fret high, the property of Mr. Lillywhitc, one of the proprietors, who conducted the business of the coach at Windsor. When the coach arrived at a short dis- tance from Hounslow, on this side, the coach came ti-arty up with another Windsor coach, called the Union. The defendant, who was driving the plain tiffs' coach at a moderate pace, drove to the ether side of the road with a view to pass the Union. It ap peared, that at the spot where he crossed the crown of the road was unusually high, and the declivity very rapid on each side. In consequence of the coach be ing top-heavy, the moment it descended from the crown of the road it was upset, and Mrs. Hewitt, one of the inside passengers was severely injured. The misfor tune appeared to be the result of accident, and no di rket blame was imputable to the defendant. It was sworn that the plaintiffs had repeatedly warned him tiqt to carry wore passengers than his legal number, b<t they should be subjected to penalties. Notwith standing the accident and the action to which the plaintiffs were subjected, they continued to retain the defendant in their employment for several months after wards, and had indeed admitted him as a partner into the concern of the coach, but having since seceded from the partnership, the present action was brought. The SoLtcyron-OaNaltat., in addressing the Jury on behalf of the defendant, concurred with his Learned Priond, Mr. Scarlett, in the propriety of this action, if it could have been made out in evidence that the alleged negligence complained of was fairly imputed to the defendant. He, however, undertook to shew, that the overloading of the coach, which caused the accident, was in consequence of the orders given by the plaintiffs to his client, and consequently that they alone were answerable for the accident which had so unfortunately happened. One fact in the case proved tl demonstration, that the plaintiffs were cognizant of the circumstance that the coach was overloaded, viz. that a hamper, nearly three feet high, directed to Mr. Lillywhite, was placed on the top of the coach. There was no evidence whatever that the defendant had taken up more passengers than the law allowed. It was Incti that there were 15 on the coach when the accident hap pened, but, for any thing that appeared, that number might have been taken up with the knowledge of the plaintiffs before the coach left London ; and if so, the defendant was clearly not liable for the consequences. The plaintiffs' own conduct 'hewed most clearly that they did not think there was any blame imputable to the defendant; for, after the accident, they continued to employ him as coachman for several months, and p.k him into partnership with them, which it was not .d all probable they would bare done had he been to slit; and it was not until they bad quarrelled with him ass partner did they think of bringing this ac ting: These facts be undertook to prove. The Cater Justtca interposed, and said, there In no evidence to show that the defendant took up any passengers after the coach left London. 1 hold it to be the duty of the proprietors themselves to see that the coach is properly and legally loaded before it pro ceeds on the' journey. It is their duty to attend the coach for that purpose. and see that a greater nerialset of passengers is not carried than the law allows. Me. ficasurrv.—l apprehend. say Lord, that the coachman is their agent fur that purpose. It is proved that they repeatedly gave him instrections not to carry n.ors paisesgers than the legal number. The Caine Justica.—The manner and proof of these instructions rather make against the plaiatillb than is favour of them. They are continually sew plainiag against the soachsan for taking snore than the earaber of passengers aliened by law, not because Of the danger to be apprehended to the lives of his lifejosty's subjects, but because they don't choose to `tin the bawd of paying penalties to the amount of _ ' \ THE SI ATESMAN. 20!. That is all; they don choose to run that ha zard, and taut from any unwilllt.eness to carry a greater number of passengers. Notwithstanding these corn— plaints, they still go on employing hint. Why no' dismiss him at once, if he is continually violating the law. If the Jury are satisfied upon these points there is no occasion to trouble the Solicitor-General to go on further. This is a ease iu which all the parties are equally to blame; and if that is the opinion of the Jury, the plaintiffs cannot recover against the defend ant. One wrong doer cannot recover against another fur the same cause of blame. Mr. SCARLETT acquiesced in the Learned Judge's direction, and elected to be—Nonsnited. GAINSFORD AND ANOTHER r. BLAcHroND. This was an action against the defendant for having in a reference made to him by one Lewis Hofer, for a character as to his credit and circumstances, wil fuily and fraudulently omitted to state that the said Leu is Hofer had been recently discharged under the Incolvent Debtors' Act,. whereby the plaintiffs, Shef field plate-manufacturers, to whom the reference to the defendant had been given, lost the sum of 140/., with whirl' they had credited Hofer. The plaintiffs' case was conducted by Mr. Sot ICITOR• GINEKAL and Mr. CHITTY; and the defendant's, by Mr. SCARLE I T and Mr. F. POLLOCK. The case proved fur the plaintiffs was in substance this :—ln the month of June, 1816, Lewis Hofer. a Dutch trader, residing in East-cheap, applied to the London a.tent of the plaintiffs, named Brown, for goods in their line on credit. The agent said his prin cipals would have no objection to give credit provided a respectable reference was given, aro; which Hofer referred Brown to the defendant. An Wert iew was had with the la.tet, and the question prof:molded to hint was—whether Lewis Hofer was regular in his payments? the answer which the defendant rave was. "He has dealt smith me—he has been in partnership. and at the time of the dissolntion he owed me 7 or 8110/. There was some little delay in paying that sum, Int it has since bren honourably discharged. He owes me now a balance of 511/.. but I ant wiliine to give him credit for any sum." It appeared that Hofer hal then recently been discharged under the Insolvent Debtors' Act t the fart was known to the defendant, but he withhell it from Sir. Brown. 'I he plaintiffs, upon the representation above-mentioned. nee Hofer credit for 961. in goods, and took his acceptame. Be fore the acceptance became due he applied for further credit, and obtained it, to the amount of 20/. The first bill was paid, and he afterwards obtained credit to the amount mentioned in thedeclaration. He after wards absconded, as was alleged, considerably in debt to several other persons. Under these circumstances the present action was brought. On the part of the defendant evidence was adduced to show that he had had considerable dealings with Hofer, who had &keys punctually paid him, and that the circumstances in which he appeared to live were such as very naturally to raise au impression favourable to his credit. he Cams Juvrtcz charged the Jury, that the de claration alleged that the defendant had wilfully and fraudulently abstained from disclosing the fact ;bat Hofer had been discharged under the Insolvent Debt ors' Act. They would judge front the evidence whe ther the allegation so made was fully sustained. The Jury found their verdict fur the defendant. ADMINISTR iTOR Or I 1010• I r. 1109 r. This was an action upon fonr notes of hand of dif ferent dates. amounting to 500/. The plaintiff was Administrator of Mr. Wilson, who had been in the Re venue; the defendant - was a pawnbroker. A prime jiteir ease w•as made out for the plaintiff. The defence was usury. lieorge Aso‘e, the defendant's son, said, be kept his father's books at the date of these transactions. Mr. Wilson first lent his father 200/. at 10 per cent.; fa I this a note of hand was given. In something more than a year afterwards, a fnrther sum was advanced, which, including the interest due on the 200/. (231. 15..) made 130/. Some time afterwards, a further sum was advanced, which, including the interest due on the lest bill and the second (all at 10 per rent.) made 1201., for which a bill was given. A very small sum was azain advanced, still including the interest on all the former bills in a , amounting to 501., and this was the 500/. made up. The Solari-ma-Os:cm 1., for the plaintiff, attempted to throw discredit on this witness, by endeavouring to show he was in partnership with his father. Mr. SCARLITT said, the payment of the money boa fide advanced, was secured to Mr. Wilson's heirs by the new bills. The Cm JCPTICE ordered a nonsnit, declaring all the instruments voided from the usury. His Lord ship said, it was as glaring a ease of usury as ever came before hito.—Nonsitit. OLD EXLEY SESSIONS, Mar 23. -~►- ISTRAORDINMIT CASE OS SIOSSEIST. Henry Jedd, .Inw►er Al/•er, and &torte Rimiall, were put to the bar, charged with stealing a watch, seals, &c. the pr sperty of Perry William Hughes, from his person. A young man, named Taylor, was convicted early in the lest Sessions of stealing a watch from the prose cutor in the present ease, who was servant to the French Ambassador. He was sentenced to transportation for life, and the three above named prisoners were coo witted by the Common-Serjeant (who tried the ease) for wilful and corrupt perjury, in having sworn that Taylor WAS in the tap-room at the time of the robbery (which was stated to be committed at the door), ma also for holding Hughes while the watch was taken from him.—Since their committal, several investiga duns have taken place at Bow-street office, by order of Lord Sidmouth, the result of which was the full emu mittal of another hackney-coachman, named Stevens, to Newgate, for trial, as the actual thief, and a respite was re rated in favour of Taylor. The facts that insta ll' Bow•street have already been amply detailed in the Police reports. The prisoners were now put upon their trial foe the robbery; the charge of perjury being still suspended terreresn over these. Messrs. ANDREWS. Attot.rnts„ and Nona, appeared as Coansel for the prisoners. There was so Comusal ihr the preseention. --- Perry WiSal Hughes was first exasaised, sad !e• tailed the ctreumstances of the robbery nearly as they have been stated. Cross-examined by Mr. AnoLruns.—Ditl 'tot know a Ft ntletnan who wag pointed out to him in Court ; he might have seen hint, bat he was not sure. He was a footman in livery to the Ambassador, who kept five footmen. The night before the robbery he slept in liiltspur-street Compter, where he was confined on a charge of riot and disorder. He was discharged by the Alderman, and did not go home all that day. He was not drunk at the time of the robbery—he would not swear that he was sober. He knew what he was about. lle rode on the box of Judd's coach from Cheapside ; he did not make a practice of riding, out side, but he did that night, as he was afraid of being sick if be got inside. He neither had nor ordered pipes of tobacco at the Marquis of tiranhy; he did not recol lect that he did ; retold not say either way on his oath. He did not smoke himself, nor did he see any other person smoking. lie gave two other persons in charge for rescuing the thief from him. Believed that the person he seized for the robbery bad on a snuff-co loured coat. It might be a light-coloured oils; he did not take particular notice. Ihe man he seized did not leave his coat behind in the scuffle, at least he did not see it. lie never told Shave, one of the men who were committed for time rescue, that he would give him a compensation if he (Mawr) would nut appear at this trial. He was sure he never said any such thing. He valved the watch aud seals at 4/. Ills. Bethel!, the h•atile of Covent•garden, was next called, and, on his cross-examination, be sai.t hr did recollect seeing the three prisoners in the house on that night. Hughes was not drunk, but he might have been drinking. Two watchmen were called, and, on cross-exami nation by Mr. Axnartn a, they said they saw no at tempt to rescue the prisoner on the way to the watch house. Ilughes had evidently he••n drinking, but did not appear to be very drunk. Ile was very noisy,, and wanted to have a coach and horses taken to the Breen-card. In his defence, Randall, in strong terms, declared his perfect innocence. If lie mi-re on his death-bed, he would swear that laylor was an knocent man. 'I he other two made a similar !,efru••r. 3lrs. Anne Wredon, landlady of :Ite Ma -lois of Granby, was examined by .%lr. Ate On S, all I swore most positively, that Randall, Allger, and faylor. were never out of the tap-room when the roblwry was committed. When Hughes came in after he Will rob-, ! bed, Taylor was just awaking bing his eves ; Hughes said to him, " I think you ere the man who robbed me of wy wa.eh." 'Caul sjd, he was mistaken, for be hail not been out of the hrstis • Hughes then said to Bethel', " take him away, be it as it may." Randall and Anger were there at the! time, but Hughes did not charge them with being parties in the robbery. bey spoke upon the subject to Hughes, and advised Taylor to go out and be searched. She heard no alarm of rblibery at the door, Hughes was very much intoxicated, aial did not pay his reckoning before he left the house, as lie had sworn he did ; she sent her boy after bin, for the reckoning. He called fur rum and water, anti pipes for four. He did smoke himself. lieorge Watson, waiver to the last witness, corro borated part of her testimony, as far as had come under his observation, on the night in question. John Eduards, a liackney,roathinan, was nest call -1 ed, and fully bore oat Mrs. Weedon and her waiter in their evidence. Frederick Cole swore, that he saw Hughes and a man scuffling in the street. That man was not Tay lor. The latter was in the tap-room at that time. Denham Campbell, • watchman, deposed, that Hughes wished him to take a hackney-coach and horses Ito the watch-house. He saw Mrs. Weedon'a waiter come up to him and demand the reckoning in the street. Hughes was quite intoxicated, and, in wit ness's judgment, was incapable of recollecting what had passed. William Shave, a waiter (one of the persons charged with the rescue), stated nearly the same circumstances as have already been described as to the scuttle in the street. Hughes said at the watch-house, that M. would not compensate him for the loss of his watch. All the witnesses for the defence underwent a most minute and severe cross-examination, by Mr. Common- Serjeant, who presided on this occasion. Mr. ANDRIVVI was about to call witnesses to cha racter, when The Foreman of the Jury intimated, that it was un secessary for the ease to proceed further, as they had Wide up their minds. The COMIIION-SCRJIANT If that is so, lientle wee, it would be a waste of time to go on with the case." The Jury thee retuned • verdict of Not Uuilty as to all the prisoners. The trial lasted tir•P hours. CAUTION TO TILANIASFISOFLO AII•INST • GANG OF SWINDLIIRS.—YFONMrdIIy Mr. J. Doidge, upbolstr fee, al. tended at biarlbersag . ls-street Am. to :sk the @dyke of 0. 11. MAINIVARINO, Esq. the magistrate. under the id. ' lowing circumstances :—He stated, that on Wednesday week,a gentleman dressed very fashion.. bly, tailed at his shop. and after being shewn ever the store-roens, agreed to perches. some •expensive articles of fornitere. and representing himself as a prrwu of property, gave his card, to which direction the goods were to be forwarded, and that the money won'd instantly he paid on their dm livery. They ware accordingly sent home with a bill and left there; when, after repeated applications, the money weld not be paid, or the goods retiree. Upon ingeay, lit (Mr. Midge) had learned, thatibere was a ganged* #eatriydea of ppe conweste Res sth who ale la ea habit of lidift bosses wader as mpliampee of espetiability. gave eiders to 11111.1•1111ishissi, and on ea del t. ivery Cy to Sheik t lailpfiftesawvoliAnold i I l' a i w t aitino laid, it UMW way mums. to mow hie gusesigaiwiteeo aillaises sad lb EMS their characters prior 0 latitishise aim reds. The swindler kitty 61 upon 4* Nil* pro pel it meld be aside se ase:e Odle a debt. If he itthat t h e penes who ordered the furniture epirmay pert of It, or had obtained it ender any peewe e by his falseiy professing to he wise his opt kilitlisaird, then be (the llarieloste) meld take wereinneseof the ease, hut not whitest. The were us bogus his wow they wove of hie and it would be useless to grant a esionneis for the of the penes to sheer wean why he the pro perty. At the request of Mr. Doer% Vetted,' the - .. ier, west with hiei to the ham, hat there was It• sod of his (airing satisfeetioa. BOX INC. The match between Dam Gee, the pottery ma n , aid Ihrtoa, a farmer in hfordshire, took place vesterri ee at Bankham, Bucks, in a thi r t een - acre ield, beiongi" to P. Topham, Esq., after having been twice remo r a The men set-tn at nine o'clock, in a tO fret square. Th e seconds were, Todd fur Burton, and With) , for Gee. Directly after letting loose of hands, Burton 'vernal, a smart left-handed facer, which drew claret front the nose, but he returned a heavy right-banded blow ap se the ribs at the same time, which hit flee away. A ra n t followed, and give and take was the order of the mam a until flee received a heavy cross-buttock. Y. This was nothing but a fightirg round of nine nutes. Gee had rather the best of it from quid:nes se ( hitting, bet his left side was much mauled by his &dy er . sary's right hand, which at times seemed to have split him. One of Burton's peepers was darkened, near the end of the round ; hut (lee was finished by a hit is the wind. 3 and 4. Both had fought themselves out, and this, were mere hugging rounds fur wind. 5. Decidedly in favour of Burton, who milled marts all parts of the ring. Bee had not strength to stop a. rush, but he had science to parry many of the kits; la at last wis run down. 6. This was the most punishing round in the fight, and told who would win. tire had got fresher, and he placed hits left and right upon the head, without ureic. ing a return blow. A sanguinary rally of three maniac, followed, when Bee was knocked down ; but he had darkened his adversary's other eye, and the lancet had no effect. 7. This was the last round. Burton hit in all direr. Lions but the right, and, after tieing much pinked, he w•aa ohligeil to give in. are, although the victor, had enough. The light lasted 2 minutes. BIRTH. On the 20th inst.. at Boologoe-Su . r-Mer, Fraaee , the Lads of Cepteiti John Mayne, late Colonnades of the Hon. Hest India Company's ship Patatia, of a son. On Tuesday. at St. Andrew's Church. Holborn, Robert Kemp. Esq. of (loser -street, to Ann, eldest daughter of J. Reese', E.q. of Woburn-place, Russell-square. __ _ _ DIED. On Thursday morning, nt Lay tonstone, in the 80th Neer of his age. (Jeerer Lear, IP:Sq. On the Itith inst., at Ashford, in the county of Kest, Mrs. Disney, widow of the late Rev. V. m. Disney, D. D. Rector of Pled.ley. . On the 2:01 inst., at thapel tilerton, in the telt year of her age, Margaret Brockden, tke wife of William Vilifies' Brown, Esq. banker, Leeds. On Wednesday last, in the Slat year of her age, Jam, the wife of - James Chsvman, Esq. of Paul's Cray-hill, Kest. " What slight neglects, what triyial fatale destroy The hardiest frame !" IEssitSATItRIE and ('O. having devoted them. j seises to the study of, and been ;retitled by the veal ci.nsiderable practice in those branches of the profession which they thought proper to select, trust, that after thirty years residence in this metropolis, their talents are so well tOO% n, and their reputation so folly established, that no ape. logy is requisite fur their deviation from the regular moded practice. It may be proper to state, that their Medical II& cation 112 S been of the first class; that they are Members sf the Rural Colleges of London and Edinburgh ; and as ntin factory es idenees of the truth of this statement, their diplo mas and testimonials may he seen at their House, No. 107, llatton-gardru, where they may be consulted with the great. est serresy and honour b‘ patients of either sex, Meted by any of the following complaints : —l. The Venereal Disease, fo r w i t t r h th e y hair diectivered a remedy, which is not os ly a complete substitute for mercury in the cure of this eomplsi st, but bas also the advantage of eradicating the disorder el tb. Out debilitating the eonititution.-11. In eases of Nev'e mu Debility and Vascular Relaxation, whethif predated by con vivial excesses, by the immoderate enjoyamete of sat wail pleasures, or by solitary sensuality, where The vigour sinks, the habit melts away, Te cheerful, pure, end animated bloom Ides from the fare, with squalid atrophy Dreamed, in sallow melancholy clad. Messrs. Currie and Go. are in poeseedee if a kfedithe that stands unrivalled for its superior efficacy, le giy lig ISM to every muscular fibre of the patient, real his Wald spirits, and re-establishing his vigour, widest* re constitution, and thus exposing him to the anion ue am lapse.-3. In Strictures of t heta rethra,Mesees.Cumittemdt plan of treatment has so far surpassed isve/y easeiessl . of core, that they hove (*welted the astoohillinit Sol 'pp* beam of the most dietingnirited Sargent*. by eabilli6 ti three weeks, cares which deed all the eettelliMM of MP skill. In the core of any of these complaiele Oki polka will be treated with the greatest skill sad solislivills. The tee required is the same es that of regular pnillissen. Patients in the country are requested to Mils prilsirs of their ease, age, and Mode of living, a Rade England Note, when the necessar y enedic i it i t r adviceelli be sent to any part of the world.- —No. 107, Illaelssierdon. ___ ____ Nuariter to 1160f10, fort fere is re. The treatment mild—tht I mire ellbetwel. ACANDID ExaittinAtion of Proksidemla PrienaOS is only to be feared by the se wbe are smear of lie cooped t y. Impressed at an early period of our professiaed NNW with the importance of a more n &tate attention to schwa( diseases peculiarly affecting the grander °madame( Na ture. we boldly deviated from w bat was held to be imbed orthodoxy ; attacked the roundel, to of empyddses. amkllt (eatingsting its vile purposes. could er ourselves justly e to that approbation sad patrons ire which, for twenty ram have rewarded our sneerssful and devoted studies. 'flu estimation of our enlightened bre thren,who &equally i to oar opinion, is an 3111110 one, grudges** ha ourpt while our authority from the Co lege itself, streadtMllta it is by the most enthusiastic t estimable's of almeeleorf Professor in the dritish Metrop oils, must ever sanctity of our fame from envy c The impetuosity of youth. or doe asomentery want ef 2 then in the matures men, often lead to the Waste d • venous disease; happy, therefor te, may the early apps be celled, whose anxiety ems h • alleviated by a Swale care; and even in the more id% 'recall stages, charemadod by numerous symptoms, we can ilinstrate ear asserdell. W rendering the treatment mild, th e cure effeeteal. Every organic casette, or ft; 'oedema! disturbance. Isil• dental to the generative economy). fells equally wilds •1 0 province, and will yield to our a Gentles. Amami lbesslP diseases of the urethra. wea keeps. and comlldhldinsal &MP meats, of bowers , tong daradon The child of inanition may be r ;Moral le int limited of being et'iausted by ne noes y. M d d r ' estate the mealier proof of vigoro is impson. sib Nab an advertisement do not allow th b eimmdidadnltet Me' juts, but they are mph , detailed in a Wed we ldhly Hated. called " The !!iglu of Life, "the tepid miss of OUP' accompanied with an increasing 'modes, eve Odd** proofs of sow general utility. The Reek teen be had at Patersoster-row: NU-SIMI; 41. Pleaselly IC p _r street. Soho; 174, and St, Fleet- street; or at my wr sellers. No diseases ere felt with greater i onlgusway ity *POW than 'boss oeepsicw.sl by his own 6spenemses; and is de eases of eonsaltatioa Is liberality et' edweatlen la ths ' fame more desirable, than where 11 at meat eibeledgi 41112, ideate is placed. and the most fort& Ibis answer Id 0 1 1 011.1 tbas Ilse tarns are plainly stated at Ilse OM Worries , . ma ad ws, to letters minntrgy detaillag tbe= kg dild dodos a remittance for mediclas a bd 011 firefele to eV y pert of the world. - issvals4llPes 0068 and Cu.. M. R. C. Borgeoo s. 11. Rantairrisa loorfiotrort.-4 Orate door mad ills, wort. Lolidli "'IN lhorormaar sad G. Tiro Cosotrr Vt ic z one •sc i il l Ah per). No. I. K Rtrond. opooder Rt. r drib. divots Proprirdor. it. WARDRLro. Jos.: ir Oral Cosousookamoss. Orders, an. ara 1•9 04 . 801 19 k granned.. tr !+ i .~ I A a~ it.