The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-06-29 00:00:00

IPT :~-1 ~: • 1 # 0 " --- 1 _ . ea T - • g r. a p t I!ISMITTANTIIO - 1 111017;ITT _Op eletWittelitt, win nakvinna, wodas remvione wain colseips. SO Mt CARS IN Telt LAST AS fi POIZSIXT . IIIIIIIIOI#II 01 OtitTLINIIN.—Ie the last Sessions of Parliament. . ronhernits Petitions on the part of die Agrieritturists of . treat Britain, stating their diminished resources, and yndiminished burdens, were placed on the table or the lionse of Commons. To these no attention was time aid. In the present they bate bees renewed; die nom • 1 er and respectability of the Petitioners, at length, saw 'riled attention to them ; they were referred to a Cow tiny". but under most inauspicious demolitions; :insisters declaring that they had no remedy to propose, and protesting against any interference with the Re venue or the Currency. Before that Committee, investigations have taken p'see equally tedious and fruitless; and 1 now con ceive it my thirty to submit to my constituents, and to Thom who confided their Petitions to my care, my , aeons for dissenting from the Report of that Cpl. ":tee. First, I most express my regret that so mach valu able time has been consumed in hearing evidence to es tablish that which no one bat his Majesty's Ministers . appear,* to donht,—the degradation of every species of produce, and the stagnation of the borne enarket consequent on it. The general distress bein admitted, indeed proved beyond controversy, it di d ...cm, of course, that some remedial measures, either as 'to the present or future, would have been proposed by the Committee, for the consideration of the logislatare; and that Parliament would not have been suffered to se parate, without attempting some alleviation of, or future -o-curity against, the sufferings of the Empire. Instead tit this, it seems the country is to find consolation in an ately prepared treatise en the alleged causes of this dis tress ; on the advantages of an approximation to a free trade in corn. We are told too, of the existence of si milar distress on the Continent; of „the Farmer's corn pined of low prices elsewhere, and of farming to a loss. rrom such statements I derive no consolation; on the ....meaty, they must inspire fresh alarm ; and, under •lech circumstances, it is difficult to ascertain what ought to be the amount of protecting duty which the British farmer should require. The unparalleled difficulties in which nor country is ° involved, his Majesty's Ministers have been pleased to attribute to over production. advance of rents, change of ramie/al, inadequate adjustment of price of wages aritl Of materials, and to large importations in 1817 and and in February. 1819, of foreign grain; en tirely overlooking the main and overwhelming source of our distress—Taxation. That an extraordinary supply of wheat from Ireland of the crap 1820, has taken place, is indeed true.—llad the prosperity of Ireland kept pace with this increased export of grain, we must Weal! rejoiced; buil verily Relieve, that this has been woe thQhmoseesults of her distress, The decline in the price of live stock has led to the ploughing up some of the prime pastures. — instead of an indication of wealth., this must be viewed as rather a proof of her increasing poverty, and of the necessity of adopting measures for the protection of her live stock as well u of corn. In our own country, we see that the augmented dis tress of the working classes has driven numbers to a !etaetitution of food of inferior quality, which checks considerably the consumption of that and of animal fi ue!. To the enormous importations of Brain during tke periods when our ports remained open, 1 do indeed e...crthe, in a considerable degree, the present dep d mate of markets. At the time of the harvest. 1439, we had on sale probably not laps than melee hundred t ousted quarters of foreign grain,—not less than an IP!, of our consumption for twelve months : though the et essities of our country did not require, then or since, a bushel of it. To this superabundance may justly be eteributed a great part of the depreciation of corn, and evr consequent misery. If effectual means be nortaken to prevent the admission of such overwhelming quanti ties of foreign grain as have been accumulated by our arts being closed,—if ever admission be given to ft:reign grain, whilst our Agriculture remains burdened a- it is nt present,—the British farmer must give np all competition with the importer, even if our rents were rut out of the question,—and our system of Finance 0.c.4 n..cessarily and speedily come to its end. I have I:ttle doubt, six mouths' supply might at this moment be It 141 trout the Continent, at less than half the rt:ce nocessary to remunerate the British grower. — ho, that has a knowledge of the state of our own Agricidtc re, can contemplate the ports being unlimitedly rTeneil in the introduction of foreign grain, without the antaeleension of the total ruin of the British farmer— s,: 3.witli I • of every other class of society ? recurrence to cash payments has, I ilo not doubt, lad great influence in augmenting our difficulties. 1 v however, that amongst those who have dedicated to most attention to this difficult subject, anal who Rase the reputation of understanding it best, there was a rearer approach to agreement. Sonic estimate the o'-ureciation at the moment of the highest issue of bank v t der to have been 30 per cent., ',tilers •211, some lint to That the sudden curtailment of the circulating wits a precipitate measure. which ought not to I era' preceded lint to have followed a reduction in taxa t:an, seems generally admitted by impartial persons.— W ben t he ci renlati ng medium was th us reduced in m114)1111,, nere,sity of providing for the-same weight of taxa tion is of itself sufficient to account for no small part of err distresses. The money price of our Agricultural • is reduced seventy millions annually ; the trans between all classes of society have been conse :quectly deranged. whilst the state continues to make the te-c same, or even increased, exactions; and the gene t-• distress which Iris arisen, seems to have been the in n able pinch are the bitter fruits of those wars in which this, rt:•:niry was involved in the Lai quarter of the past ern ti.r.f.and in the beginning of the present ! For plunging us to those wars, their authors hare received every species , of adulation anal reward, whilst those who ante va:.nly attempted. to ward off or terminate the evil, awe t i e, n assailed by every species of obloquy and abuse.— hat let me ask the admirers of that system, so well insi wed in the present day, have they, indeed, "weathered th storm P h The agricultural associations are by some persons to udly condemned, and the country, it is said, has been scisled by them. From these persons I completely differ—as Ido from the Report of the Committee. In sti•ad of contemplating a regulated trade in grain as an . e'dvantage, I consider it an object to be guarded against, .rice evil only to be tolerated from dire necessity and ss'ainst which every measure of prevention should be re sorted to render (heat Britais independent of foreign simply of every article of internal produce—to the Agri :iultural Associations and to to the investigations set on 'Prot by these , associations we are indebted for the hi ' qi,itic which has taken place. For the appointment of:. taimaiittee, and the discussions which have ensued, the ouentry is indebted to Mr. Webb Hall and his essoci s.ifs. trust they will not relax in their laudable en .-teiravonrs, but proceed with increased energy. To them 0 country owes much, and will, it is to be hoped, in c.ar fresh obligations. It w ou ld a pp ear th a t the Peti t•oriersin behalf of the Agriculture interests, have been viewed by the Committee rather as defendants than as Ostia:Ms.—Before adequate relief and security are ob .;pelned by them, their auferingi will receive. I very hs , .ech liar, not diminution ben increase. The people of kagiatot will do well, therefore, to weigh these memo- 81', 320 - 11611011. ha Petitiona, in aMr hat .4iift 6r rsdietiei IVIAelt, if mach longer with milt kW to airmaltpleuub I dread to anticipate. The i:isid to pima! weahb and prosperity in every mashy ls,it, ditti ti useful employment every se tire and able ba es, ld. To throw set of cultivation amy l titilgoer territory, capable of Improvement, mast l enestly deprecated, as =rut with the danger of more widely and the up of she meritorious labourer, and of , augmenting pauperism. In cases of dire necebeity alone, when grain, in unfortunate seasons, attains, or is likely to attain, a price oppressive to the consumer, would wish to see admission given to the produce Of foreign loads, and they on payment of a duty adequate to the ditfenraceof cost at which_ grain can be produced on the Coadnont and in theist Britain. —To such a duty it has been objected, that the consumer would imagine the amount was paid by him, and not I abstracted from the pocket of the Importer. This, I apprehend to he an error. The price of foreign grain, sold for internal consumptisa, goveraed, as far as competition among the speculators will permit, not by the cost of production or of importation, bat wholly by that of oar honse.raised grain. At the time of our greatest distress, in the commencement of the present century, the King of Prussia imposed a duty of ten per cent. on all grain exported from the territory under his control--In contemplating a foreign supply of grain it should never be lost sight of, that famine has so argu ments to combat extortion; neeessity in such a ease, is imperious, and submission unavoi dable. This ought to make us anxious to encottrage oar own agriculture, though oar rain may be prodateed at a oast greaser i than, n ordinary years, it could be procnrid from the Continent. Home produce will, I verily believe, be found, on a succession of years, the cheapest supply, if all circumstances be taken fairly into the account. Dining the war we had the monopoly of trade; if we required grain, there was no hesitation in taking our manufactures in payment. Ciremostauces are changed ; and it by no meanifollows, that those countries fr which a supply ofcorn is obtained will now receive our goods in exchange, if a cheaper or better market eau be found. Legislation, with regard to the aJtnission of foreign grain, I should wished to be viewed as ut expedient not to be resorted to except in cues of pressing necessity. I cannot, therefore, concur in the views of the Coin mince ; nor accede to such an automat of countervailing duty as they seem to have in contemplation when the prices arrive at a point requiring foreign aid. 1 should require a protecting duty of an amount to w11;%li the whole tenor of their reasoning leaves no room for hope. I should also require protection for every article of do mestic produce.—Tallow, for rumple, pays no more on importation than three guineas a ton ; whilst on expor tation from Russia it is charged with a duty of two pounds and upwards. Russian Tallow is thus, to the Injury of our own similar produce, admitted on terms so inadequately low, as even to furnish, on export from the place of produce, an article of revenue approaching in amount to our duty of import. How Illinisters re concile the incongruity of charging butter with 10/. a ton, and cheese with 2111., whilst an article of still greater import comes in one third less duty than the lowest of these. I know not. If the pro tection of one species of Agricultural production is sanctioned, on what parity of reasoning can it be wit'i. held from all the rest? In a different state of things the principles of a free trade are no doubt theoretisally preferable but situ ated as we are, whilst every tiovernment in Enrope and in ttnerica, will, whom we are connected in commerce. fence themselves with restrictive laws, it seems prepos terous to refer to principles by which none abide. In the period between 1774 anti Ist 1. we bail something resembling a free intercourse in grain: during this time certainly, our Agricultore made rapid advances, and It has been inferred, therefore, that onr country received no injury by it. lint this may be accounted for by the general state of Europe, anti the consequences of the wars, which, during that period, precluded our receiving a quantity exceeding our real wants. Since the peace of Europe has b”coine more Agricultural, and has augmented her product of all kinds from the soil. If our markets were, under any circumstances, ore to the importation of foreign pails without limitation, I should not doubt that, rather than not find a market, , wheat * mil d tie dirpot,rd uj• at 25.5. e re crier. When I the tax on foreign wool was proposed, I objected to it. conceiving, as I then did, that our manufacturers were able to deal with all the surplus wool in Europe without injury to our own produce. I am now satisfied that Spain and other countries have so greatly augnien:rd their flocks, that they could furnish us their wool at prices lower than the home grower could possibly afford,) and thus leave British fine wool wholly without a market. I ask for no measures lint sorb as are calculated to promote the general welfare anti prosperity of the com munity at large. lam ready to sacrifice any individual interest that can he proved for the general hens tit. To attribute our miseries to our internal increased is prattle- lion, to controvert one of the best established ;prin ciples of political economy,—for it is abundance rof food which gives importance to every other description of wealth. Rents have certainly risen since 1;96: in tirany cases, competition may have carried them intinitely too high ; hut it is invidious, as it is unfounded, to represent this as the principal source of our distress ; great deductions have been made since Hl4. and are daily making. What was the state of the country at the period of this rise ? Our National Debt, in Dull, was undet 300 total expenditure, 15 millions ; amount of poor duty, little above •2 millions. in IM2I, the Debt exceeds b6O millions ; ex twittlitnre, Ignorer', 60 and 70 anillious ; poor rates, S millions and a half. If rents and farmer's profits are to be reduced, so as to aupport our Agriculture with present prices, itarnmenaii sanguine enough to imagine that faith can be kept with the public caeditorl One third, nay, not notch short of (Mahal!, stater strhole pre. duce is now absorbed bZ 1 fur, tyilies e nnti taxation. Um it be iniagineel that iy.any amens II& mote than a third can be permanently exacted. The price of materials employed by the farmers, and the amount of wages paid to the labisurer and the me chanic, may not yet hr reduced to the standard which his profits will enable him to pay ;—wben that reduction takes place, it will not he of less than one-fourth on the war prices. Such an arrangement will break in still .more on the comforts of the labotuing, and middling classes, whilst it angmeists, relatively,. the advantages enjoyed by the Fundliolder anti the Servants of the State;—their dividends and salaries being received with- out deducti..a. From the Censmittee which Las just finished i fa it • boors, I did indeed tApect a recommendation of the immediate measnres to obviate the evils that might by possibility arise from an inundation if foreignirrain, an case the misfortune of had seasons s h o ok ! o li v e ' us t o open our ports. I diet look also fur protection of aU other articles of domestic produce. The repeal of the Agricultural Horse Tax is not a boos to which the country has any ohligatioas to the Committee: they owe it to the feelings of Panituornt fur the distresses of agriculture to which Ministers hare the credit, after being beaten, of yielding with a good grace. Hisappointe4 as the farmers %sill he in their ex , pection of relief and protection for agricultural pro tium—all classes of the community are deeply inter ested in the prosperity of agriculture. On this, is my view, depends the comfort and happiness of all persons in the United Empire. If protectissu to all agricultural produce is Dot to '.w IN•• meted, the t.otty most then direst its views to dot only alternative,lihiele is, N eat dome nor establish) meats; coorrart the seals of expense nt home sad abroad ; dentolbdt all useless pieces; rodese the asessent of salary paid, from the Cr... to the karat dicer of the State; and mill on the hided Proprietor for his contribution of a fair propordos to the exigencies of the State. These sources of relief seem Dot to have hen hitherto. In the very least, is the contemplation of Ministers. Pertinaeionsly they have clung to the esti mates for the year, made under a completely different aspect of our public affairs.—To one or other of these alternatives we most resort. All I have asked on the part of the Landed Proprietor, Palmer, and Labourer, is that equal justice be dealt to all. If our respective incomes are to be reduced or an nihilated, if we are to descend in our rank in society, if we are to sacrifice respectively out comforts, let not this depression nor these sufferings be confined tu this or that peculiar class, but let it be common to all. Whether the views I have taken of these important subjects are just or erroneous. you and the public must decide; of the honesty of the intention, I trust all who know one will not doubt. 1 hare the houonr to be, Gentlemen, Your faithful and obedient servant, Cavendish-square. London, J. C. Cuawax. June IS, le.l. CITY BCS [NESS. A Court of Common Council was held yesterday at Guildhall, in consequence of a Requisition to consider the propriety of rescinding the Order of insc►i`ing the Resolution of eh. lady of July last, respecting &WHI- M:Bg a military force during the meeting of a Common Hall, under the statue of Mr. Alderman Beckford. In consequence of the continued indisposition of the Lord Mayor, Sir Claudius Hunter was appointed [wine trisrms, and presided accordingly. The Court was fully attended. After some usual business had been gone throuzh, and Petitions for Leases referred for eiatuination, the Requisition was read. Sir C. licx-rEst laid before the Coma a Letter from Alderman Bridges, addressed to the Lord Mayor, upon the subject of the Requisition, which was read. In tbis letter lie solemnly asserted, that it never en tered his mind that the livery of London conhl he in duced to encourage or promote a breach of the public peace; but he believed that a large body of ill-disposed people would have - assembled without the Ilall. This motive, and this alone, had induced him to take this step. Whether thisrotirse was ju.licions or injtolietott , he would not now discuss, hut he contented !aims..ll with declaring, that he bad no intention whatever to overawe the livery, or to do any thing repugnant to their feelings. His only object was to prevent ti' peace of the city cram being disturbed, and to guard against violence and toinnit. The resolutions of the lilth of July, 1!12.0, and the 10t11 of May, were then read, after which, Mr. Ohtot.im opened the business in a speed. of cousiderahle length, in which he called to mind a few of the circutustauces of the case. On the 30th of June, 1920, a Common Hall was held, and on that day the offence imputed to the Alderman, of exiling in the Military, was committed. On the 13th of July the Court pissed an unanimous Vote of Censure on the Aldermen, which he (Mr. Oldham) bad the honour to second. The subject slept until the 19th of October following, when the notice of a motion was put on the paper for inscribing the vote under the statue of Alderusau lleckford, and on the 29th of No comber following, with this notice of • motion in their face, a Vote of Thanks was passed to Alderman Bridges, for the firmness, zeal, fidelity, and assiduity ' with which lie had discharged the duties of his office. No opposition was offered to this motion by Mr. Foveli, who had therefore acceded to it, and it passed almost unanimously. This ought to have been the time, if anv, for making any farther objections to the I conduct of the Alderman. It was trying him twice, anal punishing him twice for the same offence, to bang up his nag • • the hail as a mark for posterity. He concluded thing upon the Court to rescind the lorder of the -.tort of May last that had been obtained by surprise from a thin Court, and by so doing they would not sacrifice one iota of public principle. Mr. Jeer seconded the motion. Mr. Alderman C. SMITH implored the Court to pay sonic respect to their own Vote of Thanks. Mr. SLAPE opposed the motion, and said that Al derman Bridget' friends were obliged to admit that he had shown himself unequal to the occasion. He had in fart betrayed a degree of timidity and cowardice. —(Cries of No, no: and Order!)-11e meant Consti tutional cowardice. The speaker proceeded to con trast the conduct of Alderman Bridges, with that of the present Lord Mayor, who rejected the offer of a military force on the occasion of the Queen going to St. Paul's, and protested against their introduction, sating that he conceived the civil power sufficiently competent to keep the peace, anal so it had proved. _ _ Mr. litxoN justified ti:e conduct of Alderman Bridaes on the °coition. Mr. 4; 4 I.LowAr, iii a long speech. defended the order that had been made. _ ..• Mr. Alderman SCIIOLET supported the tuotisin. Mr. a ttotrav explained. r AL - Till L YLO It thought the court ought to consider r ti that 'a tri public principle was at stake. lle con tended that Mr. Alderman Bridges hail been guilty of a crest Folitical offence in calling in the military, and he conceived the revolution which had been passed was not too severe a isikaishment. In considering this question, be could nut bit recollect the dreadful scene of slanghter at Manc?)estei, ilea lie was fearful that, unless a firm and resoltfte line of conduct was now pur sued, the country n:ust be again disgraced by such an- other exhibition. Mr. Alderman °ARRA'r supported the motion. It was inconsitent after a vote of thanks had been passed, to propose that a previous Resolution to censure the Worthy Alderman should be posted in Guildhall. He thought enough hail been dune by ',lacing the vote of censure on the Journals. dlr. PATTEN apposed the motion. No reason had been gi►•en fur its support though many appeals hail been made to their feelings. lie opposed it on the ground of pubic prinriele: he felt that unless he did so, lee should not be doing his duty to his consti tuents. Mr. Ham' ruts asked, whether the Court would take away the reputation of a man whose private character could nJt be Impeached ? lie shop nisch regret Any pet...imam ist the execution of the resolution which be w►a tem 1. shy bad been adop•ed. He thought onsegb boil boa amm o and farther lie snow set go. .What were they ahem ? Why to Alai,. respectable man of the pod nano hi merited. • Mr. FAVILL replied, is ♦ keg attd erg feetothie speech. to the observati on of those wise sap per t i e Emotion. He disclaimed say other motive is pros s i a . the order than those of public principle. H e tma there was a growing disposition of a met dangsve k nature, to erect a military police, which might to b e resisted with firmness. Mr. CLaan then spoke in favour of the shotias, Mr. CROOK against it. Mr. Alderman WAITIIMAN considered the emai l of Mr. Alderman Bridges to have been • gross i s ,* upon the Livery of London, and the resolution whi c h bad been adopted was the only proper coarse which could have been panned. Mr. BROWN and Mr. CROKE* supported the motion, and Mr. Huarost■ spoke against it. Mr. HANIIARD opposed the motion at some k ook Mr. Etct► having said a few words, and Mr. the. HAW having replied, a division took place. The ave. bees were as follow : 12 Alliermen, ti 4 Commoners, 2 Tellers, I /.assns tenena-99 for the motion...-1 Alderman, 39 e ma , wooers, 2 Tellers—ll Against it.—The % Is therefore carried by a majority of 57. WARD or Basersunv.—The Election fir • Cots. son Councilman of this Ward finished eel Weilnrstfav, after a spirited contest, an event which ha s m a curved before in this Ward for half • century. numbers were equal until within a few minutes of the appointed hour, when it was decided in Emmet' al r. Lister, by a vote of one of the Co:emun Council, and the rejection of a voter who had presented for Mr. Hughes, in respect for who's qualification tar. Hughes's friends expressed • decided confidence and opinion. A protest was made on the comelasien the part of Mr. Hughes, on the score of the illegality of holding the Warilmote the sante day with the c ow . mon Ilail far the Election of Sheriffs; and the refuml by the presiding officer to receive some vines which ire contended to be good, and we understand that an appeal on these grounds is intended to be made is the Court of Aldermen. ELECTION OF SIIERIFFS.-At the Blow of the Pell vesterdar, the numbers were declared to be as follow: For Alderman llarratt . . . For Mr. Alderman Vrnahles . . 1311 For Mr. Crook . • 381 Abler:tan UARRATT and Alderman Vensm.cs n• turned thanks; and after a speech from Mr. Moak:, the flail adjourned. COURT OF KING'S Juxc TOE kINO r. JANE CAPI,II.E. This morning a female who %vas inflicted last Wm% by the name of Jane Curiae, and who then obtained time to emparle, stated to the Court that her real name was Susannah Wright, and that she had never passes lay the slime of rarlile. The prosecution was for the publication of libel : the party in question is not the wife, bat has been understood, we believe, to be the sister of Mr. Carlile. Mr. Justice BAYLES' said that the het ni:itht be put upon aGassit, and pleaded in abatement: the def t *. dant might come up %titbit' three day,. THE. KING P. W. H. C. MOYER, ESQ. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL moved the sentence of the (-sort upon the above defendant for certain libels pub liaised in a paper called the Lirkttiehl Merrt.ry, on the 3d and 19th November, 1%19, Nom Sir Robert Peel, Bart. The articles complained of arose out of woe differences at the general election of ISIS, when Mr. Floyer espoused the inter'? of Lord Charles Townsend for the borongh of Tamtvorth, in opposition to that of Sir Robert Peel and his son: and a challenge, pro ceeding from the same fcrtile source of dispute, passed from Air. Peel to the present defendant, and was the subject, some time back, of application to the Court of King's Bench. Ju+lgnien!. in the present adieu, was suffered to go by default. Affidavits were put in un both sides. The Soutrroa-flexe.:ab, in aggravation, adverted to the rank and character of the party aggrieved. Mr. SCARLFIr spoke in mitigation. Mr. J. WlLLtams was about to follow on the nee side, when The Loop elllrr JUSTfer, beine obliged to qnit the court, directed that the matter should sized over until Monday next. BOW•STREET.--Yesterday Hcury Jeffery, the Coach man to Ronald George AltDonahl, Esq. of Charles street, Berkeley-square, seas brought to the office, el a warrant, charging him with a breach of the peace aad a violent assault upon James Whitehead, coachman to Mr. Butler Danvers, who stated that he afedled up and was proceeding in the rank to enter the gate to the court-yard of Devonshire-house, at the grand en tertainment given by his Grace yesterday se'saight , when the prisoner, who was not in the rank, lowa leis carriage to break it, to enter the Court-card lII' We Mtn, and in ende:tvlsoring to do so, both car riages got locked logether that they could Got move, sad one of Mr. Danvers' Isorsws rearing np and Wing, he fell on some spikes, and they entered his body ender his shoulders. His screams and cries were most dis tressing. He gave another spring to extricate hew self from the spikes, which be accomplishes!, bat OIL and shortly after expired. lie was himself knocked otf his box under the coach, and had the rarrialre been able to proceed, in all probability he would have been killed on the spot. The prisoner Sogre. l bu horses must desperately, and persisted to do so..altboork he was called to and informed of the consesteetter• In this statement he was confirmed by a helper in lb@ Duke of Devonshire's stable, the : coachman aid feet' man of the Dowager Countess of elonntell sad Lid! Charlotte Pindar. "I he prisoner found bail to take Isis trial at the Westminster Sessions. His tracer. Mr. M•Donald, war one of the bail, and W. Baxter' the coachwaker, the wiser. MARRIED. Oa the 48th inst. et Camberwell, John Jolly, }Ng- I f Upper Delgrate- p lace. Pimlico, to Miss Rraysiser. of Dl' DIED. At Rosehall. N. U. ,n the 10th curt., William Mear)4 o ` dener there ever since 1747. lie attained et lean t 104: yi . l in spite of this extraordinary longevity, he reserved th ut ti e N" ll till use of all the faculties. and was able to silk abo within a very short period of his death . Edited, Priolool. sod Poillisbod A too Wiley e 1 / 4 4:17N:7 11 g 1 4:13=1:2 1 = 11 - 1614:"M.414 by R. VVARIDNU.. Jun., LL. B.: to M rs Cam' maisicatibtsa. hits, bp. are requested LP 414 , ~ J