The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-04-17 00:00:00

J.-.. I l MATP.SMAN. it's objectival. Theagh be was a sealuns advocate for the removal of Roman Catholic dismtalificattion, te could not support this Bill in the shape in which it ball come up from the other Honer. Indeed, be believed he could say for many of his Noble Friends, and for the friends of this measure in this House, that, in their opinion, modifications might, and ought ts be introduced into this Bill, so as to do away with the moat obnoxious clauses in it. The second part the Bill began with enacting a compulsory oath tor the Roman Catholic Clergy. Ile must confess be did not like the principle of compulsory oaths. He ili•1 not remember any recent instance of a compulsory oath, except that which was imposed on the Clergy of Prance, at the beginning of the Revolution. They were obliged to take an oath to the Constitution, un der the pain of deportation ; but he had the satisfaction of remembering that that oath did not emanate from an established ilovernment. The oath imposed by ,' this Bill every clergyman would he compelled to take, ander the penalty of being punished as for a misde meanour. He objected to it, not only because it was a compulsory oath, but also because, in his opinion, it was unnecessary. It was rendered unnecessary by the reference which was made to another tribunal, in order to ascertain the loyalty of the Dean or Bishop . ,elect. If they believed the clergyman on his taking the compulsory oath, there was no necessity for the tribonal ; or if they preserved the tribunal, where was the necessity of the oath ? Ile trusted, therefore, that , their Lordship% would have no objection to leave out this oath altogether. With respect to the two com missions which time Bill erected in Ireland, andat here, at the seat of tiovernmen t , he would p:opnse th they 'humid be incorporated into one ; that there might be „only one commission, which should he at ached to the tioverousent here. Indeed he was convinced that this commission, whose business it was to inspect all re se.ripts and other documents from Rome, would have very little to do. He sal persuaded that no improper recontmentlation would ever clime in any rescript from the Pope, or his council, to these cenutriere and that, in truth, it would seldom have occasion to exercise its . powers. There was another amendment he should propose in the Committee. It W3b in OW power of this Board to reject any person proposed us a Dean or Bishop. It mm as an unpleasant situation for any per son to be placed in, to be rejected by hi% Majesty's Ministers on account of supposed disaffection ; but this was not enough according to the Bill as it now stood ;—he was :malted—lseiwaspusied—he was to be . put on the rolls of the Court of Chancery as a 'Jack . Thep—lee might be referred to from generation to generation as a pe.sint deemed tintritstoorthy by Isis isfeje.ty's elovernment. He intended to propose, th it instead of being put on the Bulls of the Cuter' rof • ~Chancery, the name of the person [Disapproved of shall be only entered on the uminute-hook of the Board. There was another alteration he should propose also respecting this Board. In page 15 it was provided . that all documents transmitted to Rowe are to be sub jected to the inspecti.in of the whole Board, with the • exception of confessional ours, or papers relating: solely :o the spiritual concerns of 11. e ind;v.dua's. Any person who would take an oath that such WAS t e rata' e of any document was dispensed from sub:slitting • it to the whole Dosed, he might lay it before time Pre _ eident alone. Now the obligation of time Catholic C'er i eytnen to secrecy was binding against the whole world, Ecclesiastics as well as Laity. excepting only the head of their own Church This clause, therefore, was furring the Cathode Cle:gy to art against their consciences and their oaths. The alteration that he proposed to he made was, that the oath of the Clergyman, that the doen : them was purely relating to matters of confession, should be conclusive. The situation in which be . (Lord D.) was place I, was one f extreme nitliculty. As the advocate of time Catholics lie was bound to Ito what lie coal,' for time measure, but i:e felt that he was hound to pro ect the interests of all Catholics alike, and It • h .41 no ri4ht to sacrifice time Catholic • Clergy. . hey desire s n timing but to remain as they • et present were; they IV .nted nothing font the State; fley were content to stand io the situation in which us it daily bread depended on the performance of • their slaty. The Bill should not edam Oise those to whom it gave nothing. He agreed that they were rot to tr at with the Catholics, btu to legislate fur the whole commussitv.--(Ilear). Neither did he under valu• the tcrupirs of the Pratestants. 'I bee were ether parts of the s cond Bill which lie did not con ' s•der ahjectionable. He did nut see that it c ools' h e reasonably objected that a Board should examine ad iratruall•nts s. nt into this kingdom front Rome. Whis t:sit consisleriug what the feeling of the Catholics was, te !shout I say, hat its u4la in his opinioa it was au '• neceswy, it was a measn -e that Parliament, if they tlsest,tl s xpeslie.st, had a right to enforce. What ils feelings .•nd tr e itsions we e on any great question on which he had taken the pains to for... an opinion, to did not think it. right to go out of his way to con -'ml. Ile should br glad that the Catholics had any thing to give in retr.rn f. rr the great liberality of Parlia.s:ent. Su far trout the to asnre being car tied in the spirit of victory, he s .onld be sorry it should be passed ut something like an r anivalent. With respect to the Veto, be had . ro objeciion to it ; he was sorry that this was not the Kesteral feeling of his countrymen. As he consideres: . security unnecessary, therefore, be wonlsl not go the • length of hurting the feelings of a great holly of men. — He was pet suads d that no wan would he recommended to '• I is alit'ysty's tiovernment whom they would have aright to disapprove of, and he was just as ttttt eh persuaded that the I government would not go out of their way to - end raptious objections. It was his opinion, that with . the:Veto, the same, persons would be Illshops and Deans its without it. The Noble Earl, in conclusion, thanked trait. I.Ortlship for the indulgence they had sheen It s ittittg• the rase of his Catholic countrymen, he hoped - he had not inj iiremi the feelings of any one, for after "- the example of so proper am! temperate a discus - • elan of this great question in the other House of Par . Dame*, be should he sorry to afford an ovening to • artber tune of debate among their Lordships. Ile si oara the seePtid reading of the Wit. , Se . yeral Peer,. rose to adders% the !louse. The Lord ' C;secelirit tired on — The Earl of MANSFIELD, wl , o said that it was his • ''• antlintiOn to express. as concisrly as his halsks permitted, •oss, • .:his sa d inion on the Bill before their Lordships, which had • so.banis formed on mature refection, and which a pretty :A ; leoz residcnie in Catholic conenies Lad tended to con . ig: Time Bill before theta hail two parts. time one ti. . 4. r oder all offices open to the Catholics, the secourt•to rieulatitheir imaterromarse with the See. of liteat.e." isseon 4 /fart many of the Catholie..had .theurielve , Rested. ells objection, Imenever, was to the tirst par stlotMlM llll el l = l . ll=l=- ' -----_ to the priariple of removi n g the disabilities fouln a the ns l to Catholics—( b ear!). —The Catholics se t no their expectation• t for if an y one supposed the exthe lies of Ireland would he satisfies) without aalinission into all the o ffi ces of the State , witho ut seeing their 'Clorgv men admitted into berieficea. He (Lord Itiaasfie!a) thought that the person who ronld eonw to mob a con clusion, hail shown little foresight es to the general principles of the struggles of parties, or little, attention to the Catholic Clergy in particular—(hcar , hear'.). —It w as hinted by some, that as the Pre s by terian was the established religion of Scotland, so the Catholic might be the established religion of Ireland, leaving the Pro testant. merely tolerated. great as his obrtions would be to such a change, be should think it ar safer r r to legislate in th is way, than by gradnal conce sion to give them the political power which this end might he attained —(bear, hear, he b a y r '.). —lly Constitution, the Catholics were excluded from office. It might be samurai that there had been a necessity for the exclusion of the Catholics. If that necessity so longer existed, it must either have been from an alteration in the Catholics themselves, or in their religion. Their religion was declared unchangeable. As to the Catholics themselves, would it be said, " you were formerly inconsiderable in your numbers in relation to the whole empire, yet we dreaded you for the foreign influence with which you were con• nected ; yet, now we find that you are snore numerous. and we doubt not, that your whither% will insole your moderation, and we open the Constitution to yno with some reservations, designed, really, only to lull un thinking Protestants. 'I he history and conduct of the Church of Rome deserved Souse consideration. The desire of power anal dominion in that Church was unchangeable anal remained susaliminished. The power of the Pope in this country was put down at the time of the Reformation ; but it continued in full rigour in Spain, in the Netherlands, anal in other countries; the consequence was that no liberal spiri , was cherished ; no, the worst abuses were confirmed; the Church denounced vengeance against all wh, , should oppose it. He •% as willing to admit that from the power of the Pope in these days there was no peat icause of alarm ; but ovnat security had this country that t h e successors of his Holiness would cherish a sim ilar 1 idisposition? lie spirit which animated the whole of 1 ' their institutions was a s p irit directed not merely to the establishment of spiritual power, but of temporal ascendancy. 'Ube Priesthood knew well how to ens iploy the means of effecting those objects--they watched over the appreachiog hour of di s solution, and prevailed on the expiring penitent too e nrich their order by lorge donations—their mysteries, their cere monies, and their sacrifices all 'cooled to one object — the enlargement of their power. The state of the Roman Catholic Church in France afforded a strong instance of this. At the Revolution the property of the Church was seopiestere.l—the Priests were obliged to fly for refill:to and protection to fo reign countries; so great. indeed. was the ron•enspt in which the religion was held ius France. that even Napoleon, with ail his popularity anal power, nos not abbe to get that religion respected, even when he es tablished it by law. On the return of Louis the !dill, the Clergy int.reased their pretensions and their tic:i cily. 'I he consequence was, flout the religion had ately made an a.toonishing progress. S o much so, that in some places they claimed anal obtained the res. titntion of Church property, even from persons to whose possession it came h. descent or by purchase. — In thee parts of France, the Clergy inforeed the p ty ment of tithes. In stating these facts, hi. object was to slew t •at the Raman Catholic religion aimed at no thing less than absolute powerll4l matter what cau tion might be use.i—no in titer what top;utosing force might be employed. W lien t list force was once removed, the -pitit of innovation peenliar ' to that religion, was sure to he exerted wills increased ••nergy, anal spread over a great space. the recollected having had a c-onversation o • a former oi•casion willt a Foreizner of olistitiction, who said to him. that as a zealous Catholic he regretted the failure of die measure, Lot so well did be know the character of the Roman Catimiie Church—its unabated desire of power in Civil Government, that if he were a Nletnher of the British Parliament he wonlol liar!' resisted it. The Noble Earl Isere entered into a recital of the civil privileges which the Bill before the douse porported ' to grant to the Catholics.—The Bill held, that the Sovereign shuul a he a Prote-cont, but it perutiquol his Ministers to be Catholics. 'flue Catholic.. by the Bill, were prevented from siting as .11;3:.:es in Eccle siastical Courts, but the Bill slid nut prevent Cathol es front interfering indirectly at least, with th , • Protest ant Church. 'I here was no provision iti the dill t o i o.e.ent a Catholic from being a Preceptor to the their Apparent—there was no security that a Catholic re eeptor, coitutenanced by a C itholic Minister, might nut peryett the religions and political principles of his pupil. The Bill prevented C Mollies from heal ling the place of Lord Listen ant of Ireland ; hut the Se cretary for Ireland might be a Catholics—the Secre tary, in whose hands the efficient power of the Ad atinistration lay—every suggestion, every representa tion to the Lord Lieutenant was made by his co , vti- I• tidal adtiser, and that aalviser alight-be a C a tholic. but it was said, that the influence of Catholics w ould not he considerable; he contended that they would have power in the other (louse of Parliament, while in that House, in addition to the Catholic Peers who would immediately come in, a titinoher of Catholic Peers might he created by a Catholic Minister. The Catholic party would have considerable p.ower ; and any party acting . in Parliament aili energy and per •ey ranee trust ultimately obtain success. In such a state of things, what, he would ask, would i revent the Catholics from 'lndiot with the Dissenters to op pose the Church Establishment, to whirl' both parties weer equally hostile' There was one argument whirli ' f true, won'd be certainly calculated to tua'n• a strong impression in favour i.f the Bill—it was that the measure would tend to conciliate the people of Ireland. To attain that object there was scarcely any saerifice that he would topsider La) great—but when :/cople talked of conciliating Ireland, they merely lool.etl to a part of*the people of that country—they did not take into consiolt•ratian the Protestants tit Ireland. '!'here were indeed auolingst the Protestants many who, in the generosity of their feelings, over looked the dangers of granting poll heal power to their Catitolie fonntrympti. To the recollection of those generons hat mistaken men, he tronlil :veal the Arts of the Catholic Parliament and Clergy in due rear 10.9. They repealed the Act of Settlement— leec seized on the rereimes of tile Protestant Clattrt•li -they cLiniel tiihrs -and dr ..;'. ,„.;:!.; .sun..,, who affected to protect the Protestant Church. and ordered a restoration of the property, the Priests set his order at defiance, and declared that the King had no controul over Minters concerning the Church. The Noble Lord nest observeth that of the system of exclusion so long estahlished the &Minify had no 'rinse to complain. The Catholic religion had a pte dilection fur arbitrary power. The Presbyterian leant towards democracy—but the Protestant religion. worthy of the people who happily acknowledged its way, taught the maxims of charity, justice, rational liberty, order, moderation.—(Cheers.) --That glorious fabric over which their ancestors watched with pious care, was now menaced with danger. Should its natural protectors withdraw their assistance from it, it would sink for ever, and in its ruins would be hnried, the property, the knowledge, the liberty, the distinguishing virtues of this country. The Bishop of LONDON said, that after the eloquent speech which had just been pronounced, he rose mulct peculiar disadvantages; those disadvantages were in-1 creased liv the speech of the Noble Earl (Dononghmore), whose address was remarkable for temper and ability. On former occasions he contented himself with giving a silent vote on this question ; lie would now beg to state the reasons, why he was under the painful neces sity of opposing the present Bill. He objected both to the principle and to the form of the measure. To the' Catholics he was willing to grant the unfettered enjoy ment of their property, and the fair a dministration of equal laws. If he resisted their claim for politic4l power, it was because he was apprehensive that the ex ercise of that power by them would he slaticerons to the Protestant Establishment. The Catholic Religion (how ever respectable might he the conduct of many of the Catholics) assumed unlimitted dominion over the minds and consciences of men; and it followed as a matter of course, that no oath, however solemn—no allegation, hint: ever sacred, could be made by a Cathay. with out an important reservation on ilia part is favour of the rights of hit Church. He did ere mate this fur the purpose o f ealomaiatieg the Ca ( holie, or of insinuating that they disregarded the obligation of an oath. Th e Pretrebases imply held I their ditty to God as above all where' the cwtholic , Iheld their duty to (god and their Aar; m the Creed); i their oa Is was, therefore, to be ertimeted with mare cure to this reservation—a rearvvaikar. se awe% j arltich 'hey conscientiously made. Tbat ceeeklevatiesi Ihe confessed, weighed much with him; it had Breit , weight with vie leading characters of the Revo utieu ; they, litter .1 and enlightened as they were, saw no Isecurity fur the Church but in inakitiz thet;overoineot essentially P otestant, and in excluding the Catholics from plar...s of trust, of power, and anthority. The necessity of that exclusion was still acknowled r i in the rive of the King; but if the Sovereign was to be striven from his 'I hrone for professiitz the Roman Ca tholic religi .n, lie did not see why a subject should complain of political exclusion. ahe Bill also ex- Ousted Catholics from the offices of Lord Chancellor and Luc I Lieutenant of Island. On what priniVe, then, slid it allow them to he Privy Cise-cillors, Meas• hers of Parliament. and Governors of Colonies ? In tie Colonies, remote from domestic controul, the reli gion of the State stood in need of all the assistance of law—it wonI•1 stand in need of the countenance of a toste.ing and a friendly Gov/mown% Dist they sty pose, that from a Catholic Governor the P.otestant veil:thin would receive that cAintenance ? lie sincerely believed that the measure would temd to peat mischief it' it • ill not prove altogether fatal to the interests of t lie Colonies. When he turned from the Colonies to the state of Ireland, be saw still greater cause for alarm. lie believed the measure was dangerous to the interests of the establishments there. He could not agree with jist. aim thought that the Bill, if passed into a last', WOlllll oratioce such mighty effects on the condition of the Irish people; it would make no sensibly alteration in the condition of the Irish people ; it would make no sen sible alteration in the condition of the population of England—from it the body of the people %%mild receive no accession of wealth, of comfort, of personal independ ence; the higher orders of the laity ;alone would he be nefited by the measure, but the hotly of the people wool , ' remain as discontented as ever. Of the 1. atliolie Clergy, he was inclined to speak in terms of respect, hut they were m e —they looked up to their church, whic the believed should . hold the highest Anil m ost comma h ndin y g station ; they looked upon all other religions as found ed in error, and as unhallowed usurpations; their ambi tion and their pride were identified with a sense of duty ; cowl: Motion would only excite then' to work with be mor e activity on the feelings of their flocks, it would acceptable to them only as it might afford an opportu nity of future ien o-atiiiii, and thus concession would prove a signal of battle—not a sign of peace. The mew- sure was nut a measure of conciliation—it was reeeived by the Catholics with Mingo aion—by the Protestants with dissae:sfaction, because the restraints which to the Catholics were v exations, to the Protestants were not sa tisfactory. On the nature of those securities he would sac a few% words. If the Bill intended to legalize the Catholic llierarchy, some regulation to prevent even 1 the suspicion of their intercourse with the Court I of Rouse, would be lost reasonable anal necessary.— But the danger which was to he apprehended was not likely to fir • out of open rebellion, out o f any system which would explode in violent anal sudden i rummution ; the danger was rather to he apprehended from eh inges, which, in proc ess of nine, the secret but active perseverance of the Catholics would bring about in the Legislature and Government of the country. Against that danger no reg ulation that wisdom could des i.e, wools! be a sufficient goareutee. flow ii milli it be possible to restrain the Catholics from the exerciseof power onc e psi d, from carrying by their influence the Elections in Ireland, from exelmiing their youth 11. the schools of Jesuits, from extending hy every means in their intinenceand power—power which would stand stet i' tray hostile, and might prove ultimately f ital to the Protestant Establishment: The Ihitir of SCSSEX declared that he bad always considered the present question as one of great magni tude. :mil indeed of vital consequence to the empire. Hr liad always considered it with a due regard to those principles which placed upon the Throne that fa mily of which lie was a humble member. In looking at the 9 lie•tion their Lordships ought , in Isis opinion. to examine the origin of tits obnoxious and excli, dye law , . a 1.1 see whether those laws were consonant to the ',testa opinion of the Catholics. Untlunbtedly, at the period at which those laws were frameti, there was .10 , 4 e reason to justify them, and it was tint to I.l' e.:ltt •:.::e4l that those reasons were coupled with %irony it ritati.m. Bid a material change had taken place its id t cunistaoces. a stronger proof of which could nut he ea - hittitiol than that which might he collected from the Pe ;i.siii tin their Lordships Table—Petitions couched it teral , ,o r, gpertftt! as to co notantl their Lordships attraction. lie would now proceed to examine the an .211111'90 4 of the Rirlit Reverend Prelaie who hail just spoken. just observing at the outset that it struck him '%41 much c.,:truiion sr.).e frutu itii , uoaiers ; 4111 013! . 4.. ' which titles *Seluajnellielvritathteldthitsse: .".1. it was essential in an argnilitet that the recess e( it w~rd should he clearly understoid. would requratsi t i g Lordships to considei theism& of the Articles e t the Church, The s T i h li e d S on j i t i h ni A 6A r t, tic ti le nt ra s a wh tit o sa m :::T h ke ,ief ilajetty meetdf a h l a i th ei t t h a e le v s li o i f ef th " is li m er l i m il , t W hi l i te re tler m th r ey cletiastical oh civil, in all Cantos doth *ppm* w et. is not nor ought to be subject to any foreig n j gr ii iit tion." There was no Kunsan Cathdlie whas s o w would deny his assent to that pe o p oil d w • The article proceeded thus :—" When we us - h 7, r pul b oto ute smrain to est, t is h r e of snm ps e rari s n i r a ca n esin de et r nh o et u s: s nt f li o nte l i k st s wer t hi d ine Z ,weme at Il to f o th m e r also lately set forth by Elisabeth our gnerti, ilo IssK plainly testify, but that only prerogative whith st, see to hate been given always to all godly l'rintes sH e recii h h r o u o i a c i ol u i r Y te ge l eds dB dioa cr e b sc ru r y to l l i le n lO t .t i a a l ot i rl i r ra l: A s eo w t iw i fi al : S h e t e e st rf Ull i t sw h i osa rs e ie n i h r ini d et h t it : i s h or me tk e yh i ai t en r" : ll : a f tr : ltn e ii t c c oe h r e lit itesi m tn t ht l it s ii i ide ' rveed t te lr d fi t a h a l a hi t a t ot .iie r ea tt i t hiih u s .: o ' l . f loral, and restrain with civil sword the %Wils on' as k flat he . 4 . observe, that when be was at the University o f o w , ealrittErgdoedf 1.104,1 Horn (a University of which the King of this tuft try was the hector) he was under i Prefroor srbas general talents were well known, sni t whs , u loth with the principles of the canon law seas at k l y,• w w v• ed throughout Germany. If their Lordships wosU Lim, he would read that Professor's definition of re e l, siastieal power. His Royal hues% here read tie Learned Professor's opi;:ion in Latin at c o nsid sta bl. 4 length, and maintained i hat it was strictly costars. Ale so the articles, and to the injunction of Qum onwhirls p l t r i.onitled for ose :. r i t t iilel7ere could foettdli the regulation of society, without the consent of the S.• vereign, he could see iso difficulty in letting theta thsitirs have that %Is ire i.s the legistiriiio, t o a kin, as subjects of the realm, they were entitled. In en. troliction to the opinions maintained by the Nils Bari. wills reNieet to Papal influence, he tosintaisti that the Pope neither ought to have nor had inisesa is any country in which the Sovereign slid net eas tribute to the establishment of that influence—ls body could doubt that the Sovereign of this comer most always be a Protestant : and ther , fore what en there to apprehend from iolluence which soch s a c a vereign would of rourse not ce:ifion ? lath . 1 if he might hare the presumption to sly so, in* vereignty of this country alia tics reside its ar ist sisal, but in a corporate body. In order to shot Is fact that tt e Pope had no po et of ititerfereativib on the sanction of theSavereign, even in a Cobh country, ais 'Loyal highness adverted to the eon* tion of a lieueral Council, composed of all thetilis churches in Christendom, of Bishops, of Sasesslgst of Heads of Monastic Orders, of Heads of uniwniiits Ilse. and instanced the inefficiency of the Bull of Pio the 4th, issued to Margaret of Anjou, the, Repot id the Netherlands, which was successfully wooed bodi by the hierarchy and the civil rushers of Uvrert ment, as well as the efforts made in vain hy ?WWI.% Scoria in Spain, although aided by the Pope. II such were the difficulties, e ven in t Catholic coast: « of carrying the instructions of the Pope into effect,: fortiori those difficulties would be moth it:cruel in a Protet.'ant country A fter ar!.: din% this paint i considerable length and nit!, great ability, his ihs. Highness maintained the exneiiiency of repeals: stsecest o s s t i e He was a nxious that all Isis 31ajesty's faithful m jects should enjoy the blessings of the Constitstio providing such securities against any dangers SW might be apprehended (although he confessed that did not anticipate any), as the Legislature ostV deem e xpedient. What their Lordships Were rot' • ! upon tii do that night, was to legislate, not to cone. In his opinion, they acre not to make any concerti.. but to make sods regulations as %could bilielat, Dot H ' iman Catholics alone, but every class of his liaiestp subject. His Koval highness conclioled by err& ing his s hope, that as a Peer of that H o use, sod t' I Prince of the Blood, warmly u nrolled to the ionise of his country, be should ire evensed for hating!" Passed so low , o n their Lordships' 3ltelniUo with: fvence to a subject of vital importance to the Etepi: --(Hear, bear.) The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM contended tki this Bill was treated now a s if the qiiestion had be . Whether the Boman '.'atliolic r.ligion should ir:e` fered to exist, instead of inquiring w hether it ' wise In shut out millions of our fellow -subjects whirr levied that religion, from the blessings o f the Kee Croat Lion. '1 here had been, without doubt, a r at do in public opinion respe ctin g the etsaseiron"‘ the Homan Catholics , and n otliiti:t* showed t' " c 'less of its opponents so usu. Is, as their king 4 . ' constantly to shift their gr.onnil. .1 hat s tate of fg : '• and of social blessings which the Kyr Pfele t. " . warmly e ulogised. was erjuyed some years agos it was thought that every man who west ou ght to be banished ( roam sor ietv, ol :::, every Priest is as a f e lon.—(lc.sr.) — T imes, haul reattl.• rhatiged since, but though we I's' he now interfere it silt the exercise of l;:s c outinneil very charitably to insult his fetlifl Noble Marqui% then stated, that aongli the ele i s should now fail , vet it wouid t vet:many .arre's.: 1773 the Irish P a rliattient refused to suffer le`it s 0b1i414 is 99 years ; lint i.s the rear after, they were -1 cr le• thesis take leases for 999 vt The Ituflu's r , lilAies were, by WI Ai% Of 114 i .• P to hold con 111 l issiiiiis in the Arroy and Nav!. w ih r tf such a c oncession wa4 repeateslty agiiinst the to n. al lan* of then . Ulf"' Parliament wsis,sid t!,11% ultimately et,:..10,.. h 1 4 .11. 141 p Ow “i6111;01 ill by illrt in the liars ;t 4 . 1 ; r Elizalietli. At present the Cathi Airs ti r e , to light MU battles., lists • ire in t; e 8 1 4 7:; ! l'o them it was Icf: to son she ~ t 4 'Le/hits: the harvest. lint it was ache t. was there to b.. .7 1 :u the concessions made to the Ittws ,9l3tl4A6 ', would answer, that Ilse Lejist.ststre sochito.._ A) . until they hail milt:silted throe to all the b:toosuori, Constitution.—(Hear.) —It was tn , to , imiters. that tousi ought t lib' l to lbw 60' it had heels guilty of eJrr.ytio!, },tth tog others. Lot such it% ap..slat red Iro n, 4110,•"... 1 11