The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-03-04 00:00:00

1 ' % • •••• • r . r - rs?..; - , - :7N. - -. /C• • ~.....3- . ...„5- .4 0 ‘;;E ,06 1 elf: 1- - - ( , . . 0, - Ilmn t o o : -t Or 11 ,r, 1 , .. -',.. 1;: ttA47'-nts • Zti. Lterml • .1 4 an, : : • • . Y•. • ' , L. I :~~' LONDON, WEDNESDAY . , 1818 . , No. 3767: a_ Pluck •• TI. , Caw /sr walk% 84mrsate died !vM►sr diat *a the 0'44111" . • • QUADRILLE DANCING. Lfr h, 9. Sberra .d.stteet, Geldett.squers4 Ow, Pidilie Lemma nod Prartiee arand Country I)Aares, As clamed be the *elect nobles ta' Paris mid Laudon. Morning Sets for Lidice *My— loMahirdt Ims 4 Lake Mid Gemleinen. Private Leionai at all .104110 frob•ofht or Meninplete Pupils, of any lige. wishing Wig*, and mere expediting,. or refined acquirement than Pub- Ile Imams t•viirry. Family attended. Yineth gionlided finfesi.m, or Theatre. Ladles Inatcarted to teach their Faidlicas Astaisl . lifig which he hiss on B.slit iiew-hiveated self ray% instrwasema, enabling them too euliisme their owe Dane Balls aitiwntt fittairians, of moose thifoidoef gad skit Jamie by Clack-work. . • IMPE 14L P.diLLI4SII3NT. MOUSE OF LORDS, Maim 3.. Mr. Broaden hpitribt up the Amaral ladestaltir SRL mid the Kilns/o.4lrue H.b.pitftt Bill , wleteb, wish 5e.4101. irritate Bills, after ward' briou A ht up, were read a ant time. Peittots la favour of the Chinutey-awreirfs . Regehtdea Rill were peearatrd toy the klarquit (lamina, from Chelsea. feud ; Lard AUCKLAND, frma Sbrearhuri I tur Oak* or Sas sex, (rum Staastued.hill and Stokit New hied ; -mud the Hisao, 1•1 London, from Walthalestou • CLERK OF PARLIAMENT. The LORD CHANCELLOR read the ippoint ments made by George Fleury Rose, Esq. (Ci•rk of Parliament) for Henry Cooper, Esq., ' Birch, Esq., sad Benjamin Corry, Esq. to sign papers, and net-we all other business in his absence. Earl GROSVENOR - asked fh. Nate of Stiff when ho Weeded int of Ns: Office Q Cbetk of I rA Abli 46.;-- . IPOT3 for STAFFORDSHIRE • *BOUGHT IRON HURDLES. W., at the • egpositor , W Salty-street, o ■ ford-street s Steel-yard 1111 1 / I m6; If ppm Thames-street t and New. Wharf, Westford the Public are respectfully informed they mai be 41p with a very mperl..r article, finished by the two tows woripmen. at the following prices I—. Shoe Hertlfes, six feet Isupl as 4oor for filer., weighing 361 b., at 61. I Cattle Hardie*, Ti. Ameastie fret and is bolf waistbioada Is, al' Tg.llW4 VelloWnrOfes, gig feet long, floe feet Isinb.-Istittilift , • 1111111r.cweido, f yin made to oak, of airrotligr ingots. aismegia;• or dissowaioar. at :d. per lb. Also Ortmawstol and Farm, Wire- workawd Hare-proof filardlus is the same pr porous. Ty Distillers, Rectifjerr, and other!. *raying Distillery, Dwelling-Wiese, and Doable Malting, Kingston. MESSRS. DR \WON and VENTOM fp. sprettelly inform the finklir. that the above Property, sodserti.otl t.i take place on she Ilia inst. is SOLD by PRI- V ATE CONTRACT . Avrand Marts 34 Match, 1818. NF.W IRISH LINF.NS. WITIT.TIIIIe 'PRESENT IMPROVEMENTS IV FLAX, AND !WO PATENT IMPF.ItIAL TWINE SHIRT ING JMILLARD most respectfully informs the No . Why. Families, and the Public, the new Irish Linens. with tbe gesent Improvements in the preparation of Flat. which gives them oreat t eturohility, are sold sininprd with its peculiar seal in i:Sths and 4-4ths, tint also Ii tine h-4oht and 6-4ths for Shemines and Linens. tit hi. Wareilon,e, No. IS. CH EAPSIDE, exclusively. The Palest Twine cloth (wide ',lurk of Foreign Cotton alone. by steam), de. ilirahle for It. eondocivrness to health inn ho sad changeable (Comes, and for its economy, helot meek superior in &e. to every ether kind of Shitling Cloth, whether British or ludin. Is sold it entire Boles, nod by the Piece, regtilaily stamped, 'coot,. per yard and upwards. as above, mud tit no tether asst. Frenele Caudire.,. of th.t choice Voleueiennes Fabric, And Cambric linsidk. reliefs. with white borders, preul:arly slepirahle fur gimlets aid price. . J. tillsrd, Patentee, Importer of French Cambric, and taw Lace, Nu. 16, Cbtrupside. PETIT-OR, A GRAND AND ()S. I..FUL DISCOVERY. 440, STRAND, • Nrarty Opposite the Adelphl. ' 11 PA URE, Chronometer and • Watelt•ateker, • its ronstqueote of the great scarcity of Bullion, at the exorbitant price of Gold, has hero induced hi prodtite. by lone labour rind study, a Substitute, whiiit he has denominated PETIT-Ott ; this Wapiti:us( Discovery has been sanctioned by the moot fiatterine marks of public approbation. - The Plat T-011 MtPrsolianties so pearly to (hid. and po etises se melt el Its quality, Asa t ha differeacireat scarcely be •••eresallleilk• met corioasiasotector. It has eh unrivalled richness of tetner • is esseeptitil• of us istossigsolldis loam of polish. and, not baits so ductile as Gold le eismk , MOM% is not so easily despoiled of its beauty by scratches it yet In other, it yields to the force of the hammer, mod may be onaitded into any form. • It is prirtinderly.adapted for Watch-eases, Sauf-boves. and alliorts of Jewellery, for which Gold is at present employed. —As it tarnishes sooner titan Gold, it requires that care which Gold does not; but every time it is cleaned it will recover its original lustre a d colour. ',Airs and Gentlemen who wi.h to substitute a PETIT-OR Cnte to their Silver ..r Metal Watches. may have them done at a moderate nod fixed price, by A. MESUItE. nt his Manu factory, 490. Strand. nearly oppo.ite the Adclphi, where he has on Sale a large assortment of Watches of a ll de scriptions. with CilifS Made of his incomparable PETIT OR ; he 'sledges hirs4elf, that if any Watche. with his same, sold .by-. him. 11h1111hi that be resod to perform well, they shall be rectified. (rye of any ripener, during the course of a whole year, pros ided the fault may 1101 prone,' from any unfair eine, or accident ; ohs Gold and Silver Chronometero, for sea and pocket • Carved, Jewelled. Doi Duplex, Going Fusee, and Plain Woo 104, all warranted above; like 4wi.e all soft* of Gold Jewellery. • - - - , ' The foltswiag Artlvies of PETIT-OR are ready for sale, viz. Tooth-pick ant Pencil-easrs, Spectacles. ()peva nod Eve Ohise.e., Watch Chitin-, Seals, linteele6, Neel, Chairs. Thimtiley. Combs. and a variety of eadies 0'1111(114.116. Of Plalov Wit, Desert. Tea and Egg Spoons. Ten and Crelm row, Sugar Too's, and Smarts ; the Egg Spawns do not lose their crlusr is the Eggs as Silver d,ics. nor • Iris the acid of Fruit nisy erect no the Desert Knive4, For G r ntlemeoln the Army, Swords for Cavalry, iitfanny. and Orrnadiers. Dirk'. Daggers, o..rsrts, Delt-plutts, Spots, &c. • All suits of Watch Caws I,e;a7. iniute. at n fited price. OR MOULD PETIT-OR. which wean as well as real Gold, wlib•mt registring say more care, 'aide into all sorts of Lath& OtsvameDs.„ As the Proprietor, .A. MESURE,.dnes not employ any iiyei.t.or Traveller in the side of hi. PETIT-Olt. all t h at is bought in any other Shoo or pi.blie Side is not YETI r-oa, bat an imposilion i'.e Public. . Orders nddreAed to him at hi, Manof4clnry, No. 420. Strad. al be punctually attended to, nod the genuine Articles ttili Certainly he pr.,cured. THOSE oabsppy Patients who, throng!' lb! hotel ed promises of ignorant pretenders to ms•dical ski 11. or through wilful procraidiuution, in order to increase . e spruce. fodurs additional prior. and become considerable 10-ers hr I l t a n se, be. ate earrw,tly invited to the Elul London hicdical Fatsblisbasem, 7, C.anson.street-road, near the. Commercial. load Turnpike, ht. Gcswee's-io-the-linss, vs b-re G. J. JOR DAN, Surgeon, be. and two eminent Physictaos s daring m ntv leans' regular _practice, con prove that Anoints& fall victims Nearly t the Venereal Diseaw, ovine to improper treatment, inn' she useof those poisonous preparations termed mercanals, which finitely debilitate nod ruin she constitution Its getting in 'to the hones, which has caused ulcerations, with blotches on the -Awed, face, - nail hods, slimier* in the sight, nnhe in the ears, clearness, stria aws, obstinate glees, nodes on the shin bones, uls. 'termed 'Moats, nocturnal pains in the head and li oohs, fsequeut iy talstakas for rheumatism. at lust dropsy moues, wish gene yal dojsllily mad decay of the constitution, orighiatum front a dreadful disease lurking in she habit or the sy-tem, ben* imidsoaed by the use of mercury...abysm Jordan - and •Co. may be emmilted by all ranks of people, front nine la the antrning till nine at night, for the cure of those atiliesed with the Venereal Disease, and she many dis tressing disorders arising therefrota. Slight mod recent cw‘es are .radically cared in three days, marl if long standing, a rare will he performed in 15 dais. and Mr. J. boldly as-erts, that. wither fearing ascompetissa of professional skill, nor having recoarse to :the violent powers of ;misnames rnereurials,lue chatienges I hero to do by their milierais what he has done by his Witham* of treat ment, as teaselled on oath before the Lard Mayor fuel .A ldermen tf sae City of Loudon; and at all timer pledges himself that he . is ready to rare the above dreadful completes, is ins mow alarm- In, Paget in one-fourth of the tor e NM at half the usual ex port.. center, pass paid, inelosisse n fee, and stating the sta ture of she complaint. will be immediately attended to, and me dicine sent to any part of she kingdom. 3 Observe, the East London Medical Establishment Is d i rrISIY tialunite the Nese Mason's Yard, Cannon - street-road. }t,enrllet-ilet l l* - ta11...41p connective with say other bun:e. The ilf l / 4 14V _ Iton to bring Rider the confider:don Parliament, arithroaiew te same proveriive liens tb take piaci ..her bit 'Meting interests Mad ceased. was his ht.'s. The Martinis of LANSDOWNE, considering that the pweseot subject had reference to iho regiatationit of their Lordship,' House, suggested that some meetufwbould be taken to inform their Lordship, peon:P*4.l4.ly, of the proceedings which were likely to tom, ender their consideration. An hour had been filed for the commencement of public busines., and it would be highly useful if, in addition to that regu lation, some method was taken of communicating the nature of the business which was to be trans acted. The Earl of LIVERPOOL had no objection to any arrangement by which the object of the Noble Marciais could be accomplished, but he was not pre pared to say whether the matter ought at present to be made the .object of a regular mut . . The LORD CHANCELLOR, we understood, also intimated his coucurrence' in some arrangement for the object the Noble Marquis had in view. CLIMBING BOYS. The Earl of LIVERPOOL, in answer to a ques tion from the Earl of Lauderdale, relative to the second ►eeding of the Chimney-sweepers' Regula. lion Bill, observed, that he did not think that the Hove, from the state of its information, could yet be considered fully prepared for acceding to the principle of the Bill. Ile did not, liossever, think that the second reading ought to be resisted. It might be allowed to go into the Committee, and the prin. dple could be discussed on the Report of the third • Lord AUCKLAND said, that their Lordships wisuld hues a great body of evidence heft).* them, antes theritoppel of itm-Cerosseitevee of tke Hesse et Commons was communicated. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE gave notice, that he would, on Thursday nest, move the second read ing of the Jail Chaplains' Bill. The Bishop of LONDON thought it proper .to take this opportunity of stating, that lie would op pose one of the clauses. The LORD CHANCELLOR stated, that an ac count of persons who had forfeited their recogni lances bad been presented on the motion of a Noble Lord. As that Noble Lord was not present when it was presented, he bad moved that it be printed, sod it would ins few da)s be before the House. The Earl of CALLNARVON made the motion of which he gave notice )estertlay, for en account of the persons arrested and warrants issued, &c. under the operation of the Habeas Corpus Act. After a few words from Lord SIDNIOUTII,' who said that part of the information asked for was al ready before . the house, the motion was agreed to. INDEMNITY BILL. • The Older of the Dry being read for the commit ment of the Indemnity Bill, _ _ _ Lord HOLLAN6 rose, but not, he said, with the intention of resisting the motion for referring this-Bill to a Committee. There were, however, two or three questions which he thought it right previ ously to ask, the isomer to which might perhaps enable their Lordships to proceed with more preci sion and dispatch when in the Committee than they could otherwise do. His present purpose was not to discuss either tho principle or the details of the Bill ; but as their Lordships were about to go into the Committee, it was important to know what was the object which 'they had there to carry into execu tion; for, after all the discussion which the subject had undergone, there were still some points with respect' to which the intention of thole who had introdeced the Bill was very obscure. On one or two of the grounds on which they rested the measute, they seemed to be at variance with them selves.---It had been said, that precedent was fol lowed in the present case; hut if it had been the ob ject of the framers of the Bill to establish it on pre. cedent, the result of their labour was not consistent with their intention. All former Acts of Indemnity in this country had acknowledged nr implied that certain illegal acts had been committed, and on the ground of that illegality the indemnity was grimed ; but thepresent Bill, according to the assertions of those who supported it, the Report of the Com. mines*, and its own preamble, came before their Lordships with the allegation that no illegal act had been done. The Report which had been made by their Lordships' Committee stated that the persons who had beets taken into custody had been arrested on oath. According to all the assertions and gations, there had been no illegality ; and if there was no illegality, there c.eld be no need of indent ' fitly ; but it was said, that if Ministers should be called upon to justify themselves in Courts of Law, l they world be obliged to produce evidence whkh it would be improper to disclose. Ile could not say _,.... Ibliit ghlitiltiat be possible that a Bill no this sob.. jad Its eetiololte; bet then the object of loch a Bill csVill not be Indemnity. It *as thew proper that MO Lordship, alsbeld. know before thy 1 : -,. fritist tit!) 110 Committose I* which of thou Objects ihtlielitifoi .... . _. ~. lien was to be directed, or subedit It wet ta tif t: • ottpected of them that they 'geld occompitsg ,ofejecte. Whitt were they. to'll' coned ipito in 4a t themase clasper! awairoals sedoldaariiewer for ritistelf. I siblocts he bad 'aimed tot. If git the isteeeedingaasid legal. what danger reedit t litre be in eta-losing the ea 1 1 NI Mitch the arrests had Wei wide ? There was another ' ; wiwilb Abe appeared to nth worth of their 11111epatissa., rimmely, how far this Bill flowed aid 00311111110elee tt:the IfitTobsion Set of last Se&siou. !died hoes keel hoe 'Lordships could suppose that the Habeas Corpus Woisitt be without this Hill %resoling necessary ; bet he new eon that lie bad apt sees this natural coosequence 8 hat if it ✓ existed , alight it not to he Oki! Lord.litos' basiaess to eon mete eat that et-martian is .the Coillisit tee t The Hill, es h w eisd.essotaised ao re/teener tattle Seledeuthih nett frets which it, welsaid to 'prim. Thlt greed* dociewed that es whiter** '=ahad estistied. Veil shat waamensos bus t. ;insesatiled.dte..esiabilleillellhdia douse. new themsgpeddisis stall thiv_tiewewidiega beam tint, were prepowto he ressettd to. The MU, however, die not de ehsve that die* sew had been dose in coasequemee of the Saspeo sten of the Habeas Corpus. This B.N. therefore, applied gene rally to all arrests, and was in that respect were extensive in its application than the measures which were said to have gives it origin. Another dinieolty here arose in considering this BUI. which, instead of being founded on preeedeat, differed in one material respect. not only from all the old Hills of Indemnity ie this cowetry, hot from that of 1/101, which had so often been al luded in, sanunnch al it granted indemnity. nut only for areal ing and detaining persons, but far diochargior. Have prisoner. Ho- a been illegally di.ehareed ? It would become their lead ships a ell to consider what might be the erect of the no roditc• lion of ibis word into the Hill, ant merely with respect to the protection of Ministers, hut to the future security of the permas to wit to it appli e d. if Ministers, or the Maristrilei who, an der thew, carried the Habeas Corpus Sospeosion into execu tion. had acted legally in discharging prisoners, they would stand in on need of indemnity. They could It sue 00 fettiof pro ducing evidence to show that they lead acted acord Mg to law in aortiagtbe persons they had arrested at liberty. It via. neces sary, however, in call their Lordships' attentiou particularly to this circumstance, as it appeared that there were casts in which the discharge of prisoners by the Magistrates might be illeral. la stonier this he tst.l.ed to refer their Lordships tun case which occurred in Hilary Term. 171tN, before Mr. Juaire Aihhurst, Mr Justice Huller, and Mr. Justice (irate. The case WAS en. titled, Morgan v. Hughes. The plaintilf haulm! been ac cused of felony, and discharged, brought his action for mall. cinus imprisonment against the Justice of the Pe a ce. The de claration of the plai Allowed that he had been dilchargrtf. Upon fists a speci .1 demurrer was entered, setting forth that it did not appear by the declaration. that the plaint, ff laud Oren tried and acquitted. or discharged by due course of Law. and that it did not therefore appear that the commitment ss as with. out cause, The declaration, in fact, must mate. that the prose cution is at an end; for a person aggrieved cannot bring an action, without showing that be has been discharged acrauding to a due coarse of law, either by a Grand Jury throwing out the hi I of indictment preferred . against him, by acquittal on trial, or by a moll progeri. Their Lordships would therefore perceive, that the extension of the Bill so cases of discharge was o f its e lf an indemnity to Ministers. That this was the unavoid ab!e con,equence of the in&todeetion of that word into the bill. wits evident from the judgment given in the ease to which lie had alluded. Mr. Justice Huller on that occasion said, " The grounds of a malicious prosecution are, lit, that it nal *oar maliciously; 2dly. wit out probable cause. The want &pro balite cause is she gi-t of the action s. fur it should have showed sea the face of the record, that the prosecotiva was at au mid.— hargiag that the *Waal' was ' di-charged' is oat Sae4.4 0,, ikie last equal so she word • acquitted,' whir% law a Mot e mean ing. Where the word acquitted is used, it must be oiwleratood in the legal sense, namely. by a Jury on the trial. lint there are various ways by which a man may be di-chareedflom his imprisonment. without putting an end to the suit. If, indeed, it had hers alleged, that he was discharged by the Grand Jury's not finding the bill, that would have shown a legal end to the prosecution." Tile other Judges were of the same opinion.— After what he had stated, and, en particular, after basing re cited this decision of the Court of King's lieuch, he thought it right that their Lordships should he informed an the hollow jog points:-Ist, points : —lst, Whether a person discharged by sothority of the Secretary, a Magistrate. without any bill of indictment egairot him having beeu thrown out by a Grand Jury, or acquittal on trial, or on a noli pratrfai. can he held to be discharged ac cording to law ? 2, Would *discharge by the Secretary of State pr the person from beinf again arrested on the same charge? S. Could a person discharged by the Secretary of State insert in his declaration, on bringing an action, that there was an end of the suit against him ? These were important questions, and he thought them worthy of their tor.l.hip,' cosh. sideration, on grounds totally independent of the Hill before them. The LORD CHA NCELLOIt wished, in the first plice, to observe, that he did not consider binsiell so great au adept in the Criminal Law as to be &ways prepared to give their Lordships a satisfactory 41)4 niott upon every difficulty that might be started.— fn the present case he must also confess, that he could not recollect the terms of the qeestion which the Noble Lord had put with sufficient precisow, to enable him to give it a full answer, were ice in other 'respects capable of an doing. With regard t• what had been said es to this Bill being founded on preeo. dent in all its provisions., he certainly had Hever so argued it. He had, oa the contrary. observed, that when the Habeas Corpus was suspended in the reign of King William, it was distitreily acknowledged, in the Bill of Indemnity, that illegal acts bud been committed; but it was at the same lime declared, that these acts were so necessary for the safety of the country, and the preservation of the Constitution, that it was fit no persona should be pot to the et. pence of defending themselves in suits which might be brought for their j gommission. The principle of thi Act of 1801, though different, was a just prigs, cfple 61..4. It was this—that the names of persons who had given information, should not he disclosed. Whether that principle was to be, bona fide, in any particular instance maintained, depended oriAlsoisi tom , whom the Constitution had given the right of dedd. ing on such questions. That informations had bed properly received in the cases referred to in the prea sent Bill,was of course aquestion of confidence iv thoep who bad ordered the most% and must be so from the nature of the case, and it was for the 11901.• FP* to consider whether that confidence ought to be re posed. With respect .to the questions proprq by the Noble Lord, he wished they had been peerinosly communicated to him, but he would answer them as far as he could at the moment. lie was not aware, till he came • into the House this evening, .That the word dischatged was introduced into the OM, but that the reasons for it were quite sufficient he had 110 doubt. •It .was certainly true, that a Magisttate, having committed an individual upon an easiness chsrge, could trot afterwards discharge him ; but cases might occur, in which such conduct on 'tiepin of Magistrates might be perfectly jostifiabli, and strictly proper. Take, for instance s the case of the ' Blisuketeers en they were called), at M.A.cheoter.— There was no doebt that 'then 10,00Itor 12.000 per.; some set shoot Marching fn a body to - London ' that. .the Magistrates were pe r f ec tly justified in eirdeareor. Joel ..4% the emit of the ringleaders, to ptsennr so - fiagrowt a breath of the peace. It Mil also perfectly proper, that when the siltation bed alighted' Mod persons so arrested aboul4 be released, whims, de- Wolf% the. to he dischetesid in doe reuse at , It sags therefore, highly prolver, the as; fodeasaity. should be extended to Magittratet• sthe bed so acted, thoegh not id strict conformity ebb law, yet froth the best motieea l and from soothes whirls oust be reco"oised to bet hi petfect abided whit public expediency.. its to the dischdrge of WA *Masi, by order of the *velar? df State ; upon recogeletussea •to appear it, the Calk of King'! Ire seli t he bid a* deign *bitterer Burt it was per. fete adoeleteste• 'kb Witt 'at 'bedlam% rocegilifell si wok. btket-shr Juars Hat bed ewer tittle shettiorrt 4 moue of Orison 'had ewe doubted the legality af-ehtlf practite. The Hogue resorted Itself info I ebniatittee spots the Bill, Earl of Shaftesbury in - the Chair: The title of the Bill hating been read. I short pause ensued, it baring been ingot to pristpotie the readable, till after the discussion of the clauses. . The Lord CHANCELLOIL said. that in this caws the preamble was so inter stoten oith the clausal of the Bill, that.ba thought it would be proper not td postpt,O, it, but to consider the preamble in the hrst inosuce. The Earl of LA LiDERDALP observed, that the usual course was to postpone the preamble, end. `therefore he thought the Noble and Learned Lord ought to briag forward some precedents far deputing, iu the present instance, from that usage. Lord REDESDALE contended, that it would me tecially serve the convenience of the House to pro ceed first to the consideration of the preamble, be cause the preamble itself was intimately connected with the enacting clauses and would, in fact, be no cespory as a point of reference to explain many of the objects to which those clauses were directed. The Hart of CARNAR VON admitted that there was a close connection, grammatical se well as sub stantial, between the preamble and the enacting clauses, but the question was, whether in proceed: , iug to pus an objectionable Dill of that description it would be more proper, as well u more convenient, ' to go to the enactments in the first Instance, and afterwards to seit the.preemble to them, or to fix tho preamble first, and then proceed to the enactments, thackleri god embarrassed by that previous step. ---1 This was a point of great constitutional impatience. For his ewe partlss could see no objection is 'the ()flitter, made of pow penieg Ike peosabite,AmLimat hoped they .wowld west he Gelled epee sereepliareely to recognize principles in that which *ben they camel to the enactments themselves, many Noble Lords might be disposed to queetion and to resist. The LORD CHANCELLOR said, that la many Acts the preamble was a mere form, reciting the oba .the eneetnients that were to follow I bet the present was so materially connected with the sub: stance of the Bill itself, es to render its postpone. mint inconvenient. Hee, for instance., cneld they decide upon the propriety of the clause *bich re ferred to tomeltooes,earreesblies, without looking to the preamble to re what was meant by tumultuous asseMblies? Evefrometing which took place in the ceur;eof the last two years was net to be concluded is necessarily of a tameltateet character. The pre. amble, therefore, in which the precise description was marked out, oodla seem to come naturally ke order before those parts of the Bill which would re. quire to be referred back to it is order to be under. stood. Lord GRENVILLE.—The noose, of ederte 4 ',award e discretion in this emitter, bat some good reasons aught to be required wby their •Lordships should depart from their accustomed forms. With respect to the words which were supposed to connect the pre.mble and the first enacting clause, if the ',tremble were omitted altogether, the clause would, of course, be unintelligible ; . bet Noble Lords melt, in the discussion, beat in mind that the preamble was only postponed, and it was better, in hitr mind, to loon the Committee free to investigate the various objects of the Hill, and, having determined on them, their bordships.would thee be in a situation to as- certain hoe comprehensive the words of the preemble °iglu to be. . lord -II EDESDALE concurred is this seggestioe f end the preamble was postponed. On reeding the first chew, indetstoitying sit per. seas mho, - since the lit of Joinery. had arrested, or cooped thaarrist, &c. of soy individual, . The Atari of LAUDERDALE objected to the words !' first day or 'nullity." The Suspension Low hordmot been enacted until the 4th of March, . while shio•Bill wield estend the indemnity to the tat et lea... Seth.* proposition undermined the ne comrity of the Suspension Law altogether, for the Ino demitgv.llllll.ivosild of itself have set all things right. Yorohir mends ;" first day of Joinery," the Noble Earl propeled that there be substituted the " fourth depot Mirth." TbeiCesl et LIVERPOOL objected to this mo. lien.. Acts ipight be done in the progress of a mea -1 tors, which, snaring the nature oil the measure, wept also often kb fate. A rettaspecti,ve efect was obsoletely necessary. It must be remembered, that on the eery Grade, of the meeting of Parliament, a grass oolongs hod been offered to the sacred person of an illestrions Individeal, .and if person, bad been arrested in consequence of Wit event, *by should not the present Bill estend to these who coined inch rests ? . He had no objection that the wools " 96th day of January" slionald beinserted. The Berl of LAUDERDALE.—This implied a l i ' . .. -1 4 '‘i /