The Statesman. — London, England, 1814-05-18 00:00:00

.~' '~ ~ V b . r • :::rr 1 ) "IL - . r V W ' "itafei ME STATI4SMAN. - IMPERIAL PARLLA 3f ENT. —.I. - HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 17. The !emir Draw back Bill was read a third time sad passed. Le rd (IRM ON I) presented a Petition ftom the Noblemen and (entry the county of Kilkenny. in favour of the rropoded aterutiets in the Coi u Laws.—Laid on the table. tit 3. Grahaui and others from the Contaious, brought up the Irish 1 iteipitals Bill, the Dotter Goal Bill, and several priiaie Bills. which were read the first time. Bloxam's Disolee Bill was oho brooght up and agreed to by the Coco cions.• • • • DULWICH COLLEGE PILL. The Duke of NOMMILIONaIatott iriessatalstabileam a former day from several persons of the mused Allen. praline to be beard Oy Counsel ag4uniLthe Ilalw Gruce said, that the allegations in that Petitioa had barn vied doted ohjoctionalge by several Noble Lords; Mahe wailliatiat withdraw tog it, to Mira nue five frometdection. The Petition was accordingly withdrawn. lard HOLLAND es pressed sorne• satisfaction at aealst thei Petition withdrawn. The Petitioners bad certairet:lmposee an w, whoa •*rue little short of perjury to the. Master of the pa his Lord,hip knew to be a worthy man. • • • - • The Dube NORFOLK obseried in answer. that •be W iwi seen the l'etWon, ns it appeared to the Sable Wt. Ile thought it would not bear the charge of perjuq. Vit did. hit: Grace mai persuaded the Petitioners bad not Inteadoodly made it. The Deke of NOR FOLK then presented moth* ?WOW& train the same persons. and for the mese object. which was or dered to he on the table. The Noble Dateable tonged foe a re tort, of the statutes regulating the Coundation of Dulteidli Col: lege, %kick ass accordingly ordered.—Adjoirroed. ought. Pnflifebttleirit 4 P 4 l 4444w i hr 7- _ communication. t , EinTortirit; Mr P. troiNng ot the tenets of - Jesuits, Mr. CREEVEY main'tiltied . tilt tile Act of ..Pera-‘allrered l frhm l Paley'itrd mast others in the meaning -.- - With respect to Boarde-irsf-an eath ; assertinee tolsersecundarrVAdertibw' 'for the 14 mOtitinthe had mantis; and not seclindunf inte-nilen;eol' --.---1-...issi, teen then Mid i lettir TriniTri'— -- - of Coot roOl - le could .1 HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. LOCKIIA ItT presented a Petition free the Journey men Meehnnics of London and Wegmioltert Whig the AP" preetice USlL—Orderrd to lie on the table. b rha Cositenw and War Duties Bill went through a Committee. —Reportstedered to be tvceived tramorrow. Mr. LDIMINGTON gave notice, that on Friday next he ilinttirt melte the Army Extr.tordinaries in a Committee of s lo' Cope Wine Rill went through a Committ e e . —Repo or dense. to be received to-morrow. Thy Irish lirapihtis Bill was read a third time and paused. Lord STAN Lgy moved forleave to bring in a Bill to ex-, Bill the 4sd of the King. respecting Ctlnuty Bridges. The Bill was immediately afterecar l- brought in, read a first time, and ordered to he re,:d a second time on Friday next. LOCAL POOR H 1 LC. Mr. KEN RICK moved die third rending of the Local Poor Btti. SIT C. MONK moved an Amendment of the first clause. Mr. Til(111 FSON coocelved the Bill to be highly olijection able: It p roposed nothing• less than to repea l at one swee p et ury Bil l which the !louse bad passed for the last hundred leers res; , ecting the settlement of the pour. The Ilouse divided-- For the Amendment Agaiust it . - - • 29 • Majority against tbe Amendittent 22 The Bill was then read a third time and passed. • ttAST INDIA COMPANY. . Mr. CR BE YEY, rose to make the motion of which be bad Oen notice, inspecting the correipondence between the Boma of Controul and the East India' Company, relative to pensions. the particular pa: l per which be wished to ism laid before the House was a letter from Lord Buckinghamshire, President of the Board of Controul, to the East India Direc tory, dated in January last. By the Act of 179.3 1 1 wider the old charter, certain pensions had been I granted to different persons, for certain terms of years. One to the Marquis Wellesley, one to Mr. Hastings, and to several others. These.pensions hack ceased on the expiration of that Act, land my Lord Buckinghamshire had taken opon himself to write to. l , the Court of Directors and propose to them, of hhi own accord and authority, that those pensions should' be revived. Nay, he had even advised that they , should some of them be altered. He had state(' is the said letter, that the late Lord Melville had died very poor, and that the present Lord, his son, had been put to great inconvenience in paying his father's debts ; and he recommended that the pension of the late Lord should be continued to the present Lord Melville. Lord Buckinghamshire, by his office of President of the Board of Controul, ought to be the protector of the Company's revenues and property, and not the distributor of them. When a recom mendation of that nature was given by one Minister in favour of another Minister, it was easy to conceive *bst died it was likely to hare, and in his opinion such conduct was by no means proper in a person of his particular situation. It was against both the let. ter sod spirit of the law, to give such a recommenda tion ; and was, in fact, a kind of notice of a motion for a grant of 20,0001. to Lord Melville. He (Mr. C.) was desirous of knowing if Lord Buckingham shir,., in writing that letter, were within the law ; if he were, lie thought the law ought to be altere d.— The Hon. Gentleman concluded by moving, " That a copy of a letter from the Earl of Buckinghamshire, President of the Board of Controul, dated January 12, 1814, to Robert Thornton, Esq. Chairman of the Court of Directors, be published." Mr. WALLACE was of opinion, that no fair Par liamentary ground had been stated for the publication of the paper in question, and that any discnssion at present would be as premature as it was unprecedent ed. The letter was of a private nature, merely sug gesting the propriety of taking certain matters into consideration. The President could may act official, ly with the Board of Controul, and not with the Court of Direeors, and the letter could impose no duty either upon the Directors or upon the Proprietors. The Holt. Gentleman, however, seemed to regard the I. , tter, somewhat in the light of a Message trim the throne, upon which it was incumbent-to socks tie some resolution. - That the Court of 'Proprietors should be anxious to testify their Sittlill,Of gwi to_ of the late Lord Melville, could be matter of surprise to none who were acquainted with the iswhint ser vices he had rendered to the East India Gimpy. Sir MARK WOOD fully concurred with the last speaker. Though he himself had never received any personal favour from the lite Lord Melville; Yet so highly did he estimate his services to the East India Company, that, if no other gentleman shotild bring forward a proposition upon the 'abject, he himself should, in the Court of Proprietors, move for a fur ther remuneration to the late Lord Melville. Mr.IIOWORTH contended, that the letter was *lolly of a public tiature— [ hear _'—which Lott! Buckinghamshire had no authority to write. By the - - • Act, of railiament, three Commissioners were rim's- I Certain, recent circumstances had made a. strong tin...* to ask the question, and chatechise . eery to form a Board, though he understood, that, tut 1 liressiOn lit Ireland bite it Was his intentien . tt:in ject, ili 110 . Vt!ti lOC acting against law, and ought a. considerable time, Boards had-bsos , dispensed with, 1 'ice them only. 00l compacted with CPrOjll . plopm he not to'he.sospected, Us, had answered willingly the and the whole management had centred in the first . should now Err to be printed, They contained otOtelpestions. • Mr.' , K. had entitled 'hits to say ? Lord. The letter was Itoth tiro public nature and . the riigniittlohe ofiVoinith'Caihollc ili§cffilitialn, Other4:4le, , _444tCetiONAly hie . own • private sliro coOrary to the Act of Pirliament. , countries.; b e t posticolarly. in .Canatlo itul. • Malta, . porSt.a.od lbst lis acted °My from- a view of public Alr. T. CO URTENA.Y atiadi tilt the last &c. One material piper hid not Imo titillt2o;s b t -: goo ,„.„'". :- . ',I .m . ~,- ~ .. ~. ~ „,,, :. speaker had been misinformed Ow 'llsC:lsliOct -of all, The whole *go s iinpOifant, st 0 .it. ,tiobt. 4 oo 1 . . ' Tx, tir.s4:o4o'. - np., . I. l**rlinent curiosity. Ili 13oardi. 'lle himself, except iu soli)e very rare in- ; points, of 'the interference of the Crown• id the lio. I ,an quostloot valuta .itias great . jealottay , of T. stattces 3 had - never pat tip name to ir . iyitt litilei#7l minarion i b'f•Eilstopi,'inil the itiOrtisca'n s Of F'escklipti Lir' eft *ittrst : Ittipiillympeityi in 'filtd, Tlntiftl'ire re present. The lettiit ti'qyostion was as from. tbeinpalSea also ito , ,ovsiii* Of; perhU9q3:llt Was•oowfiessaircle. Aiesisiolyqne, of ..his. IL:'s ,To ws, as. enuch of a private nature ii iny , :cnirteriadion Open graver nature-41ie soolay-Attrtile . .leseitt. -.Alnisbee Jestilt, was a vow of poverty. Ili Was, there.: he subject could be, as he himself, though Secretary bad been started as to their existence, but he could fore, warranted in the question; for after what had • 4• .. - .. , , . • --.....1%. -- " K, miliry t 'hief SecretCl tpg ' 114 t Intee'ktke , ( rap, -0 II - against no Me passed, Mr. is.. ibis of the 4‘ desirous that he - should .w no inference vernment's watching the proceedings with jea. ‘ • isy. The continuance of suspicions might justly compel an answer from such a quarter. Sir J. NEWPOR.T.—The Jesuit property in Ca. atla was not confiscated ; but no more Jesuits were to be allowed; by which . means the-vshrphr property came into one man's hands, who heldli to the last. AtrilMittatitterreerdiat •the oadarirafileGir end. — Sr 1. CO - X.EItiPPISLEY - Teirpitrit their. ,structions to' Canada, 'and 'MR4,41 1 41)0 itt!ey weri •says', taloa ambnettleCortilititilottelt-,-Ituntua or .... _ , a Lioartin4/ond cries of hear', &AO, from theifi. leeedings atrrinitliiii4litioliVoi ilid'inriter r . tilt 4 una- cr u x ..........o, atm anoweu.tuatl eau we nisterial side of the Monte,] —and he had beard Iblel to discover the altisealleobjects,, as the Jesuits !'euptatessad tre.a todwatid latitheli teiklitiCe'ea.,o I re -- :: ~ were not remarkahhefilepiellitat'dhiclosn • at, ; perr y vested in the 'Ilf• li that, from 1784 to 1808, when he sat there__ ..r. ," t . ~ . . . . . .res , Crown,. ti r •t-e . royal pleasure had not been a single initp.nce of a, Beard.-110 . }he' expressed MS- Itoora,,.'ot i Ole' tdastatuatices - o'a should by declared v t elistinglesutts *mallow. ter was official io the * usual mode of the first deal. lietion of a t icb.'i;ilo4.systeiii 4 OO tbefaisaticism ot e 'ed to red >i Theliddit tie l cirtiscdied'Wgre granted missitnier of the Board'ht•Controut. -- • •.1 Roman.Catho li c-inhallititatat ,ffit atr.:l3.lllippilatte. Ito Lord Amherst: wian' aril:later& commuted them Mr. WALLACralltiiikted, that lie ow i ll' .. entisent- then adverted to the bolding of Synarde of Catiii4i for a solo. .All, Other - tiartnief. 'tete& t ewar d e , t h ffinv - .. . _....._ hared ono Board at which ;• though 11104 OA ,bikets prelates, as la - bee . ri• lately done, and which he eelt6' ttie bull; as Great firitain•had tiine.: .AT t ee ... discussed,. nothing had been doee.t.4 Mod& .. :., - i thotight.coatraey,*ll4'istWderoes..zfrom their • the-abolition of the. order -by-Pope-4artganefai.-efe ' . interferfeffiewlik L ibt et:V 444.1r6talbedtitiy ten:. ders were weittert to Ireland to payiorer . ati p'rep' et ty Mr. SULLIVAN said; that the letter . left with the Jesuits •tili-itZ . 0 a • .. part - meant to operate ill some way or other.—t ••••••,4ideration. -py.Deblin• Papereot it l ast three or Wirrainidgi to Matteis': ecotesiasticalateradia •pa 4 4'72 At present, howevoc, he ,did set conceive 1 to,be tfoor , days, it appeared that the . seeorld ordersof : the e pard. A question '' tangible, nor in what spatter an ,application. Could tiny tiriet-T-pe.Es3lles---pprioieThiFienifisit letter frail bad been raised, 9, hither ititiad been t done so. Yet some 'Aid he had revived them •be made for its rod crisp . ;. itarould be batter to Rome ; and likewise , a part 'of Ati bieliopw• The Cardinal Bores had denied that, the filth . P r o es pe or h e a d d . wait to see what would follow. j Prelate, described' their Meetieettti Febroary.26, : ever: Mr, CRJAVEY--The letter is in the India . ! 1810, as being held 'af Clablln; in the' ,011 , , ,,, ii* by his oracular viva sores. Titio- 3010901. were • oi l • • -,. house, and ha been printed. .; . the Pontificate of the Itoly Fattier, Pius , j . He' avowed to fie private property by n Man who b e d Mr. 140 WORTH explained. . I hoped the Irish Government were alive to the cense- I made a Vow of poverty; this was a serious subject it M. WHIT BR.EAD.—ff we were to watt foe,lquenca of suet' ptocaedirigix as well as td those of • Government. These thiniacontinued multi lead.* • r hat Might follow from the letter, Gentlemen Who th Catholic Board ill Dublin, :which had proposed i something dangeroste r if- 'toe -initief ' lar-fretand.' . " opposed the publication might easily prevent. Bur to sed to theCortee of Spalo,eto.sey that they were I were Indifferent to the*. Vie present Pope was a thing,from following. The letter could with no face oppressed by this Government; then acting in con. ! man of excellent : iiiirta. cliaketer ; yet' hit Milet - Ite • be said to be Ovate. It had beeq read at a public junction with that of Spain, which had ennobled and i dbvoted to his dwell., aitnrit was possible that dot e r meeting ; •and it appeared from the speech of an rewarded n noble Duke our Commander, but who ° particular advice, and looking ,to the Jesuits as the Hop. Bart. (Sir M. Wood), that upon him at least might thus be It'eldarp•as an enemy ': to .the Spanish • Most tent vice, of Critholic infla e who • it had produced some effect. it would seem from the . religion f 'rheyltrotild , appeal. te the most intolerant i had formerly wormed themselves isittitilliConfes i sioa l ' language of some Hon. Gentlemen, that Lord Buck- ; nation in •Europe • ii lith ntiglit he seen from the lof almost all Courts, •he might be persuaded to rant: r inghamsbire could at one time resolve himself into e ! slew code, whiCh suffered none but Catholics, andl his fi let for the restoration of the order. privatalndivideal, and at another, into President of even competed the Members of the Cortes to be I Tbe'peper anis then ordered to be 'printed, tope - the, boated of Coutroul. One thing it appeared sworn to li . onceanntiY4'Woard the hills' Cathellciii der with' tte 'reprintin of several others which ha d : • pretty, plainly, he could not do, and that was to -put appeal to Spain question.of • their rights and pri. ; been laid before the House in last May and June. • the Right Hon. Gent. (Mf.. Wallace) upon the India ` allege? Another effort had beeilanadeln the Cache- 1 - 'The Apprentice Bill was Committed pro forme; Company. It would seem that no Boards were as,,, He Board r which was rendered Co by the , and the report was ordered to be taken ' tato further sembled, but that all the business was done either by refusal of the Clergy. It was to Mike the Clergy I Consideration on Friday. the President or by the Secretary. The-praotice had exact donations Pe r head , (sem all .11.omart Catholic I . Several pe titions were p resented res p ecting the I been to convert letters, to the public a ti on of which • householders ! setting a minimum oti each subscrip.tcorn laws. CORN La.Vffs. then. were objections, into private communications; • lion, and marking each refusal by the words 44 re- presented by Sir M. W. RIDLKY, the House of Commons, however, had sometimes fusing teepeoce , ,- The measures very lately put• A. Petition against the proposed change in the decided that those letters were public; and your s he o were quite opposed to What. he conceived the , Corn Laws was and ordered to lie on the table. thority, Sir (said Mr. Whitbread, addressing the opinions of the body a few years back. The same l On the motion of Mr. FOSTER for the recent- Speaker), I make no doubt will quickly cause the '. individual J r.( Milner, we b e li e ve , ) who procured ° mittal of the Report respecting the Corn Laws, letter in question to be produced. : He 'bed heard. ' from Rome the abandonment of all requests for tern- : though he did not pretend to vouch for the fact, that porals, did the nest year solicit the same for the Sir JOHN NEWPORT expressed his conviction that tare most convincing arguments had beep ad a sheet of blank paper bad been pu t over d ocuments Apostolic Vicars in England. He also wished his ' duced to show that It was the policy of this c ountr y that Were to be signed, and that the signature . had (Sir J. C. 11.%).assistaitce in this object, because he i .: to guard its home agriculture by providing again s t been affixed at the end of the blank. .. • I had 'procured come' relief for the suffering Ro man mers h e the free import of foreign corn. If it were asked Mr. T. Courtenay, Mr. Whitbresidt an d . M r .. Catholic Ecclesiastics in Scotland'. ' The whether it was necessary to alter the arrangements Wallace, severally explained. . I Minded to would show the general regulations of the of 1804, or provide any additional icard for our Mr. ILLIVAN again expressedn wish, that the' church, which ware admitted at Rome , and which agricelture, as that agriculture had since increased, Hon. Mover would wait till something should be ' might be compared with there cent-letter from thence. he should answer that this increase was sot owing done in consequence of the letter. . Be could not avoid remarking, the extraordinary ; but to the peculiar nature of • Mr. CRKEVEY.—It is my object that nothing state of things in Dublitt, in consequence of the re- to those arrangements, our relations with foreign states. Besides; it was may be done in consequence, of it. i ceipt of the rescript, and' the differences between the now impirsr.ihle to put the agriculturists in the'Swina The house then divided, end the numbers were— i Palates and the second order of Ecclesiastics. Un less Government watched closely the.proceedingswere in in 1804, as 'so many addi. For Ar. Creevr) 's s;otion . Is o f , slate that they : portal burdens had been since imposed upon them, A g ainst it - • 55 a Board a ff ecting and exercising such powers as the Mnjority m ains! the Motion -39 Catholic Board, and adopted some wise measures, • and would it then be fair to expose them to competi. Dil MD •STEA LI N li; lion in their own market with foreign sgrleultorists, Mr. W. SMITH observed, that the crime of child. be much feared very serious consequencert. lie con cluded by moving for the printing of Extracts ( pare- after having incurred those very bordens—after bet stealing was not, at present, puUishable b y law, though the stealing of dui child's clothes w a slaw, so . : graph 42 aid 43) from the instructions sent under coming subject to such a weight of taxation for the i . the sign manual-to' Sir-George Provost, Governor of deliverance of Europe ; for the advantage of Foreign) which, though a small offence, might be punished severely. It appeared a blot on our legislation, that I Ci"ada' on the 2.tii .of October, .181 t, and which States, in order to relieve them from the calamities of .. I were presented to the House in July, 1813. l wars ? Such a proposition would, indeed, be utterly a child might he stolen without punishment. He un. derstood that Judges felt it their duty to inform Ju-1 Mr. BATHURST seconded the motion. idestitute of common justice, • as to allow a foreigner, armed with the security which Great Britain had ries', that if the intention was only the stealing of i . Sir 11. PARNELL said, that as to the 30,0001. be was empowered to stare that the whole object was purchased for him by twenty years war s , to undersei the child, and not of the - clothes, they must acquit.; ! contained in a printed prospectus which he had seen. i the British trader. in his own market.. In fact,,the • • In the commission of this crime the child was cer.. 'lt at as merely to establish a school for young Clergy- principles of t free trade could not , be fairlyip •• vainly sometimes stolen only for its clothes, and then i men and others, to which persons of a different tell.: plied to the qUestion of corn, especially after it was not carried away farther - from home than suits gion might be admitted, without interfering in their i those principles had been departed from with re 'ed the robber's purpose. This, howlerer; merited some punishment. A respectable pm e e d n o man I faith. Nothing had been said to show that, fart.; gird to our other manufactures. Our wordiest ' !her objects were contemplated. At this time ; ManefaCture„. for instance, was protected!! against in Westminster, some time back, lost &child, which ' Was left without its clothes under an arch of West- of day, it seemed absurd to loppose - farther ob.:. the competition of any foreigner whatever is • jects, in . view . The Jesuits were now . extreme.l our • own market, and why should 'not our corn ,: Illittser-bridge, in snowy weather, at the flowing of 'the tide: i it.crawled up the steps, and laid hold of a' ly few in numbers, The proceeding oppenred to : meet an equal protection? It was alleged:that this person to whom it could but just make itself under- him wholly justi fi able and legal, and contained Proposed arrangement would serve to impose a • pig s hothing to merit hiputations. rnanent taz upon the consumer ; hut he denied the' • 4tood. The robbery was proved, sentence passed, ' but the robber pardoned. Another motive for the ' Mr' PEEL thought the present not the time to ' ' • of this elle. r ustice „a ton. If, however, it wereevete .. enter into these subjects at length. Ile felt their im- i true, he should have no hesitation twomertrthatte --- crime was seen in the case of the little boy, Dellow, portanie, and was sure that there could be no in- : would be for the 'interest of the consumer to pay 1 stolen to be brought up by others : but could this Terence of neglect on the part of the Irish Govern. that tax i'n order to secure the advantages •of that ,compensate for the agony of mind occasioned to pa menf. In consequence of what' bad passed, noel the I steady supply, and independency of any foreign treats? Could the argument used for the Slave alarm excited , he had an interview with Mr. Kenny, I State, Which the measure promised. As •to the ae- • Nrade, that the child was placed in a better condi lien, avail ? A third motive in this o ff ence was to the person alluded to as establi shing the school : and' gement that th e tendency of this measure would slated to hitn, that doubts existed respecting the in - I be to throw capital unnaturally into agrieutitire,. he ' sell the stolen child,. sometimes as instruments in the siltation, and it was thought that Castle Browne had thoUt it quite untenable, as the only probablo to- bands of common beggars, to work on the compas also of individuals ; thus consigning them to wretch- been purchased not merely for a religious, but a . w ould t be to recover for agriculture, .whicit•- • lay institution. Mr. K. sent him a prospectus, so d formed the most solid wealth of' a nation that ic e • redness and vice : at other times they were sold to be stated his willingness to educate Protestants if they p i ta! which had been heretofore diverted from it by devoted to the most disagreeable employments, such but he declined answering the question. at an undue-parthrlity to manufacturts. Hut die st.t., as chiraney-sweeping, Bre. ; he expected in his mo- • pleased ; to the source of the funds for the purchase, Sic, . vantages Which the proposed arrangement -held out 1 , lion all support, - and no opposition, as he had heerd• That was the substattee of the conversation, which to Ireland were -incalculable. In that couotey, the : if no Intention to object. Five years' ago a skald telt' Mr. K. he might have reason to state in Par- interests of which was completely. identified with Bill passed that - Homo, and by some accident was he Llettl in the Lords in the last stage. He then . lisanent. - . ) that of Great Britain, not above sue-fourth of the :nsoved for ivies tii bring in a Bill for better prevent- ' Sir J. NEWPORT 'said, that . tho Archbishop of', people were employed in manufactures, the remeiw , leg the crime of Child-stealing. i Dahlia some years . declitted sid.cliouing . the school., l i der being wholly dependent on agricalturier pale • Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW could not second the mo- , from an opprehension •of some impropriety, us-ft- aurage, and there agriculture has •If •late yeartmade ' I was a Catholic seiniuhry; but this matter was eller. .very considerable advance ; ' insomuch, Indeed, _that: lion silently. Juries hid often acquitted offenders, wards arranged. lie saw nothing inept in it. Mr. ,It - had exported a vast quantity ro, Corn to thi3.prld • while they lamented that the law compelled them : at Other timed their feelings had led them to violate the K. had no desire of concealment. It appeared e11...1ef the Empire. 1;ould it then be fair or wiseti:' law. .The law as it remained must be injurious to gible*ktPathulie's shauld - h are a domestic educat i on, !impede the prosperity of that country ?—But if:sack moral feelings arid the. public interests. . i miff beneficial to Ireland., particularly. now the can- !impediment were really offered, what must be the . . Mr. PEEL,boped the Bill would besAlstendial to 'load was re-opened. It was wrong that persons who ''tote of things between the two countries I—lrefanati Ireland. • , , ... had no 'means of defending themselves, should be; at present took the manufactures :of En i d A g au , an Leese was given • the Bill brought tip ; read ''it animadverted upon in the consideration of r dif- paid for their corn. It indeed prafhibited any maw fyst.tinky sod ordeved.to.be reed * second time on ferret tapir.'. , . . • facturer from entering into competition with that of Thursday. •it, • Sir-IL PARNELL expleitted; that * Mr. K.'i• re- '_England in the Irish market. Its 'dudes withaview • - . BOMAN. tvettrir,ves. I foist to state the sourcesasithe fetid,: aroenfrom his to that prohibition were, upon woollen , ran 5O to L Sir 40#i COX.F. HIPPISLEY rtinitiikdife teat conkeptioit (list t he Seertisey iiita . ,iitatatilll entitled in favour Of England--upon hardware as 33 to 10— . . .: .. . - • him on the sub- I upon glass as B 3 to 10, and so on in Tortiow upon .. proi.,, _ earthenware and other articles of English rtianuiac-. tore. Would it then be an equitable return towards Ireland to withhold due encouragement from tbut 'agriculture which enabled it to pay for such articles— , which enabled it, especially of tare years, to become 4he.best customer of England i—lit feet, tf that evi. , . . . rcouttlemetri were refused, he could not . conceiVA :how the Irish people were to pay those thsetitee• rents, which formed so severe a drain" Upon that ca t initry. Theiie absentee reuts... laolehar, were spent in England, which thus profited, in every N oks point of view, by the imge 'log industry of Ire - s \ 'r - . It_ ‘ '. •., e to the Board, had been nnapprised of it, till he state •to flies that recently 30. 4 4 , ;. . taserty 4 P llss het .of it rom t . ;. ‘1 ... „a-H2nll. ten the left r 'Vain out of whi s. t th . 4 . • die (tool t h... l i e lit ; te' 1 jp, . Pillar o*(l7Nroutuss h lad' .en . purchaseff.' ~: I 4, 1 . tOledolw $ was ~ edit). ~, :' - • • • ilefika alkittl't at its held ~ ' , iltlCattiolic.‘ Gm . , . . . 1.,. 9Z}Jaki,-ihat wjietheithelle4. nen. A 'Orson well And •,•1 e kOtgle o f lout ter were pu : is or private; it was such an one as let rs, Mr. Plowden, had written' argely In Its COm 'Pa on the ground of similar esta. S ought not to be sanctioned; and adm itt i n g it to be a praise, defending it nneldwinteeiso4.4PaiiehtWitur effect of , a publierbiiskneato ie4heiebresei.-fievteer-MfemeebiVefleas d e___-.4.... M.__P traalina a the tenets of Jesuits, to I I'