The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-08-05 00:00:00

P LcSc( Th)v (eitrattmlitzuto Lkk kkAL I N o• 4790. OF EAMT-INDIA STOCK. 11) THE PROirsat... _ _ Idiom AVACANCY having occurred in the Di.t TIOX epee by the resignation of Sir DAVID SCOTT, Met.K htemoboal on me to redeem the pledge Which I pte is lay last Address to you. b ) standing tOrw urd as (* somas fee ye* %tour Ws the present °erasion. I pre sume taretteledlet tint 'Tell among the Proprietors who 'limy fresh:mai bait been seqeuintrd with the eminent lima : ms yM t sbad the honour to fill in India, awl with the high e prehaties sod distinctions which aceompr ni my long end nose eon/ of Public Service, the mature of my preten ' s i b °, Iles sow been so fully male karma', eiTher personally by g iter,thist a further statement of them in this Address vi a hitleetaid a sapertions repetition : 1 dual, therefore, areas illy hope that those pretensldba pay be ,14 1 1 to reader se worthy of your hainicliata choice. sod mod IM aessrasee of my renewal end habitual devotion to, tat bran a your Nerflee, If this. my hope, shall be M ot My Moog diligence has been employed sires the last myelin, - waling my peraoselreapeeta to iadithiaally thaw Proprietors - the [bare the honour to be. Gentlest's aid Ladles. Tour sliest ithetlLent end grateful humble servant. N. B. EDMONMTONE. • N. B. 'The Pasetion is Seed for Wedsesday the Wit' Inst. Mr. notonsteese's Committee will meet daily at the King's 11•4J'1' . h the Poultry. where ever) eonuounieetlos will be thank /Ay Sebbstarlsgod. T3l. W. PARKLICS and RICH %RD ROTH WELL. E.sqrs. High Shelia of the County of Aliddlesec. and City of London. Sias, July 22. IMO. lITE, the woJer.igned, bring Freeholder* of the VT Colaty of Middlesex, respect /ally request you to eon. iron a Meeting of the Freeholders of the roanty of MAW. ges on as early ■ day as poisible, at the Mermaid Teems. Hackney, in the said county. for the purpose of eousideriug of the propriety of presenting as Address of Condolence to the Queea Consort of England. Sc. he. for the many sod elhming tomes her Wiest has sustained since her departure f}am this mouth., also to eongratulate her Majcity on her safe return to She British Nanny ; and to consider the pro ceedings atm pesteliag in Partianteut against her Mojest). We ars. Sirs. yam obedient Servants, (Signed by Sixty-eight Freeholders.) la eomplisnee with the above Requisition a Meeting of •e Freeholders of the eseaty of Middlesex is hereby ap pointed to be held at the Mermaid Tavern. Hackney, in the mid count). on TUESDAY, Use Sth day of August. Iftco. at rselve .'clock. Ang. 3d. MS. J. W. PARK Sherif. Jobs's torrece. Hackney Road. Aug. ?, 10 MR. MERU, PAMCINs. ' have '• - .. .... use right", tea.. pre se-:t ?roreetlitig stroll nut et as foture period be introduced as a precedent to the county. On behalf of the Requisitionists, I have the honour to he. .., Your\ re-upeet fully, JOHN BUTLER. Chairman. I I 'l4 Mr. JOHN fiIJTI.ER. Chairman of the Middlesex Requisitionists. Sta—to complying with the invest request of the Free holders of the untety of Middlesex, to convene ea early Ilreting, I think it peeper to seed to the Puddle, dos" with tae Form of the Reqmsition, your Loner 'dammed to me tope the subject. In explanation of what, In the tome ofthe Requisitionists. yea are platted to all my " Meeterice" to eautply with their request. !shell take au early opportunity of trenstuittine io }on my rot-moppet/ewer with Mr. Sherif Rothwell.l do not hesitate to admit my relnetenee, even le my official capacity. le have any thieg to do witha questioa, the very discusgion of yekithas a tendency to tear 'seeder the nearest and dearest Alloosedblo, sod to excite an hostile feeling In the eountry; red=bibs li e of tech extreme delicacy , where the ...,,,h,... of the two principal personage, in the Kliiillagh Ire at Alike, sad wantonly, as I must think. set et miMeare with ',eh other, to their own mutest tbeeer, twitch us to that of the notion at forge ; on which nil23ect I took the *beefy, previous to her Majesty's relent to this tourney. to give my humble, butt decided opinion to ore of tila Mintetere. strongly , recommending a digerent line of Nadia, to that sow observed towards our unfortunate queen. _ . Whatever may be the Imes of the radium proeeetlings. I cedes, I wa• out snotts to appear either ollicially or is elridaallv in the huNiness; sod therefore was the more par t c!ar fiat you should see every. *sans in your power to 41:esin the enneorrence of my Collregue to oaks toward . ' i °livening the meeting. but oo Sadie, that object unattain able. I here not alined a tootle's* to perform my duty by comp!, ing with the hems of the Requisition. I am, Sir, Your obedient servant. ,I. W. PARKINS, Sheriff. 14 . alk Illfirlateet. Id Au g. ItWO. .... Laasolta's Jays still triumph' In the mired Mina renown, by public voter decreed ! /* A It& DE RS liod Compaoy, sale Proprietor.' of , AA the red/ Irepeelol &Imo Working. duly appreciating Abe basest essafernal l a thes. la the decided peefereviert given to their Artiste of adaelore. by a generous end dis eentiett Patine, hog I. to the homage of their most reheat acknowledgment,, ti rl d a e v r ieg been graciously pa tronized by his Rapti Iligionoss the Prince Regent. they are mow placed its the pro.sisitmat situation of Blacking Mane hemmers to his !thq oh-. sad have is consequence altered their label. hl ...übstitottag . owthe bottles, le. the Royal Arms for lir Ptiace's l'rest ; and Owe pordettlarly to marls the ilia tinetioe. their noes will berteefueth appose on each label is ILlveriss Lerrsas. 'he above inestimable Composition le will prepared and said Wholesale, at their Orldioal Warehouse. Mo. S. Ship litme. Semple Roe. Loudon (both in Liquid and Paste). at *a lellowhonlariees. vitt. ia basilica at ltd. lud. ltd. and Is. dd. rods; as is also Ober modlimppeoved Royal Year= Pot titooto; and It e ralt e d by di resperveble Shopkeepers in filit Unitimliiagdom. dtr is Omit Alloiemicolo ilieeehants. Captains, sad *deers, isk j edas, paying my presoaal respects to you hien ly ; stilt 1 not thorn* Proprietors ow whom I may not yet IPA will ascribe the omission eletalively to the ma t for the Canvey. logisialf of this opportanity tpsektioarinipeovitit cor- al mole, Pil_e•Sseatsperamsa wOrliiPport which have k e b assiatiaC and to ensure you, that even without re- gyms to my Immediate views, the very flattering opinion le morally been manifested. of the validity of my pralandests, is a asset of the highest gratification to ny - _ Svc tfter the essay beerviews 1 have had with you on the es of the Ineetbig lif dot Freeholders of the comity et eed the olhhellete wheal of yeer eelleope else to seed the Raltidties proosielloil to hint. 1 have con- -141114 Mew of 11Pleislehrelot - s, ma th 4. 2 - 4me to ex- . ,114441111111111111wwe erldwitseir , • q ): . - mittneltlng to a question in which it alma. 4 ; " • lajtered In - ideal. and infrioges on Mu Nl*: theamititetion of the country, laden.% the lilt 0 • to Wives you, in your official capacity, and t erra „ rectify/ oaf, Wiest foresee delay, to Mr a Meeting of the . If the musty of )Middlesex for Tuesday neat. at • the M., maid . Haden. for Twelve o'clock. end to let mile* °Clio smelt* give. by Advertisement in the Morn- ' lug Advertises , . the Times, Morning Chronicle. the States- man. MnatiliS Pt et, SS ihe Courier, ets Friday. Saturday. and Monday, petiole toting Meeting.—Mme objection hat- ing been intrudreeti respeetiag the defraying the spruces, I beg to assure you that all legal and necessary exibencc shall br paid by es, reserving to oermlses the right , that the pre: LONDON, SATURDAY, AUGUST 5, 1820; " The Canoe for which HAMPDEN fell in the laid, and SYDNEY died on the Scaffold."' PROVIDENT 'LIFE OFFICE. REGENT-STREET. berh instituted in the Ecclesiastical or other Courts. or whether the Queen could have been con stitutionally impeached. Nye bow to the decision of the great law authorities by whom the Throne is surrounded ; and we conclude, that as no method of trial known to the ordinary tribunals, nor even the es traordinarY *node of impeachment, has been adopted, that a Bill was the only proceeding that cont.) reach the offence of the Query. But we cannot disguise from ourselves that a hill inflicting penalties onghtin very few cases indeed to be resorted to. If impeach ment has been likened to tieliah's sword, which should only be brought out of the temple on 'solemn occasions, Isn't MSC+ Male is this observation trite of •inzle laws mule for -a single case, which at once create the offence, regulate the proof, decide upon the evidence, and invent the punishment ?—a mode of crinsinal !conviction to anomalous, and so fearfully liable to-injustice, 43 to have been censured and rejected by many of the most enlightened men of ancient amt modern times—not writing in the heat of blood but placing beacons to guide states and empires in the right comae of legislation*. Without yielding to their arguments, we may be permitted to obterve, that, when the Parliament of England has .auctioned laws against individnals, it has usually been either when the &r, used peewit tied from trial, as in the eases of the Earl of Clarendon and Lord Bolingbroke— ot when a sudden insurrection and invasion to change the dynasty were apprehended. as in the cast of Bishop Atterbnry—or when peculiar circumstances occurred, as the tale of Sir John Fenwick, who, after a Bill was found against him by a tirand Jury, defrauded justice by a pretended contribution, and abusing the lenity of the law and the mercy of his prosecutors, bribed one of the witnesses against him to ro abroad. But is this case what is the reason for a Bill of Paine and Penalties ? Has the Queen fled from justice ? Is there a paramount State necessity fur punishment ? Are there any cireumstances leading us to suppose that justice will be defrauded if this bill does not' pass? That the Queen has nut fled from justice is not only the admission, but forms one of the chief charges of her prosecutors This point, therefore, requires no proof. Is there. thee, a paratuonnt State necessity ? We confess we are unable to perceive it. I he Queen, it is well known, has fur many years un happily been separated from your Majesty, and during the last six years, indeed, has resided out of this country. It is impossible, therefore, for any sober. tuintitel man to maintain that there is danger lest the succession of the Crown be tainted. As little, or nearly as little, is there any danger fur the future. The rest point of the succession, then—the only one on which the conduct of the Queen is of paramount Wears' to she State—is not acne*. Even if we go a step further, and inquire whether the behaviour of the Queen has affected the public morals of England ? to this question also, we must reply in the negative. The Queen has been several yeare resident abroad : hether, as her enemies Anti, her life was lice - tiou;—or whether, as her friend% stoutly maintain, she upheld her royal* character—the influence of her example could extend only to the inhabitants of Como or of Athent To tite wires and aanghters of Eng lan I she was eztiuct—resuoved from their sphere of action, as effectually as it she hail been drat—and to their ears the detail' of her domestic life, the scandal tales of her neighbours and her servants, the scenes of immorality which are alleged to have happened, are now, for the first time, to be revealed by the in quiry your Majesty hat been advised to set on foot. If then there is no par.ttnount neceesity, nor even a prima . fivie case of policy, for proceeding against the Queen by bill, let us next inquire whether the ends of justice will be defeated if this bill does not pass ? It is difficult to say they would. If the law of Eng land has made no provision fur trying the Queen on a charge of immoral conduct abroad, the reason is probably to be found in the conclusion We have just made, that each conduct does nut seriously affect the State. But, on the other hand, we are compelled to represent that the ends of justice may be grossly de feated sty the passing of the bill now pending in Par liament. Fur what, let us humbly ask, is the situation of the Queen ? Separated from her husband during the first rear of her marriage, she has been out of that circle of domestic duties and &Illicitly affections which alone are of power to keep a wife holy and Nate from evil For the period to which the accusation extends she has been also removed front the control of pnblic opinion—the best remaining cheek this world can af ford upon female behaviour. Many women, unhap pily, there are in England, who have abandoned hus bands is.trinly attached to them, and a loner fatuity- wig children dependent upon them for maternal caw; • not one has yet been exposed to such an ordeal, or threatened with such a disgrace, as the Queen. Is it just (may we ask') that an offence deserving of pe culiar indulgence should be visited with extraordinary severity ? Much distrust, it must also be manifest, will attach, to the witnesses'. It is well known (without undue prejudice we may say it), that the stendard of morality for female conduct is not so high in Italy as it is in England ; and the consequence is that a ready belief is given to any story, however improbable, which affects the honour of a woman. Again, the witnesses do not give evidence in th it own country s and their characterin.their own neighbourhood is not at •take. If persons of some rank its England have accused the Queen falsely, what may we nut expert front the stray servants of au Italian town—from the jele-on and flat sum of a licenriunc people—from the caves-droppers of the whole,Continent, solicited and brought/up:titer by an emissary of the British Conti, 14 ku is even now ran sacking the Milanese for evidence against the Queen. There are other circumstances tending to pollute the stee i a l ut b ittstice in this high matter. It is is kaftan (sae the suspicious,l that, in voting on a bill, some of that political affection which the House of Lords may entertain should not enter into this de- PER4()NSI insured for Life in this Office share 1 the Profits SYPTFIVNIALLY with the Members, accord ing to their respective contributions ; thus, by the specific sums insured, and contingent profits, they have the fullest value for their pay meats. in a manner needy similar to that until lately adopted in the Equitable Office, but with this presumed istprorratent. viz that as the original Members have raised a permanent Fund. deemed amply sufficient tbr the purse of indemnity. it is provided, that uo personal responsibility shall attach to the Policy Molders. Hance those who seek protection are secured from uneertsinty and risk of loss as in a Proprietary Mike, having a large inhe-, ritable capital, and are entitled to a participetlon in the pro fits, as in a Delon Society. These profits have been realized to a considerable estent ; the first septennial dividend Vas 13/.Be. tier cent. ; the second (recently made), ear . together. 40/. per cent. Maori Mew insured at this Office are not charged wile: any sciditiOnal premium melees called into actual *revive. No edmiseims fees en reepthed, ten navy eh.,p, sole fur ire/ides, except the stam duly. J. T. BARBER BF.AUVIONT, Managing Director. Agents are appointed is all the principal Towns in Great Rritain, who are also Agents to the COUNTY FIRE OFFICE. founded on similar principles. TRUSSES. —In consequence of the demand for and great benefit derived from th• nye of PINTIIN's PATENT TRUSSEs. uithuut Metallic tpriugg. GA WAN and Co. beg beat.• to inform the Public that their Manufae tory is no• at No ?On. Fleet-street.—These Trusses are highly approved of I.y the mast eminent Surgeons in town and eorintry. and recommended on seeming of their great and uniform pretstire %Avis chafing. Iltripectable refer races can b.• given to burgeons and other; who have proved their good elfeet.i.—Those by whom Steel Trim's hat► been worn give the decided preference to P. Pindin'i. N. B. Personvientlingtherireumferenee of the hod! below tbe hips. mead the largest part of the thigh. •toting which side they are 'Moved. may depend on being correctl) fitted. LORD JOHN RUSSELL to MR. WILBERFORCE TVNIBRIDGE-WELLS, Aug. 3, le2o. Sll,-1 address to eon a public letter, 'because you ate a public man on whom much depends. Although I generally differ with you in politics. 1 warmly 5 4 . 011 ~llr generous efforts for the welfare of mankind, and I believe you capable of doing at this moment a great benefit to your emiotry. Fur this reason I communicate to you, in the torn, of a petition to the King, my senti ments on the one subject of the present day. The Wl•igs, 3s you well know, hate no power whatct yr. It is useless for them to originate any thin!. If they move in part, they are defeated by a ministerial majority : it they attend public meetings, it is said they are endea vouring to bring about a revolution, and new laws to restrain freedom are immediately enacted. Hut you, Sir, and some others. whose 'lmport is the sole strem:th of Administration, are bound to interfere if .they bate any thing of the wisdom and prudence which you attribute to their general conduct. In the following paper I have given no opinion on the guilt or innocence of the queen. I regret and dis approve of the measure of leasing her Majesty's name out of the Liturgy-1 regret, though I cannot severely blame, the language of many of the addretses that have been presented to her. I do not wish to prejudice a question of which we know nothing. • I have also omitted many topics that might have been insisted urn. You are perfectly aware of the nattye of the &scissions that will take place, and the temper in which they will be met. In Motu hands is, p4rhaps, Sir, the fate of this country. The future historian will ask, whether it was right to risk the welfare of Englantl—her boasted constitution — her national power—on the event of an inquiry into the conduct of the Princess of Wales, in her villa upon the Lake of Como ? From the majority which followed you in the House of Commons, he will conclude you had the power to prevent the die being thrown. He will ask, If you wanted the inclination ? I remain, your faithful and obedient servant, JOHN KUS.SCLL. THE HUMBLE PETITION OF TO HIS MAJESTY THE KINO. We, your Majesty's most dutiful and obedient sub jects, approach your Majesty with feelings of the deep est anxiety and the most profound respect, but at the same time with a firm conviction of the uprightness of I our intentions, to address your Majesty on the snbject of her Majesty the Queen. Were the conduct of the Queen a private natter, were it a subject that concerned your Majesty alone, we should be the last persons to intrude with our advice, or to delay the trial of the Queen's conduct a single in stant. Hut your Majesty has nobly shown that you consider it a matter of public import : your Majesty has proved, by offers of an amicable arrangement, that yon were ready to allow a Queen, charged with a total abandonment of her duty, still to retain the title of your wife, and to be notified as such to time powers of Europe. It was only when the Queen landed in England that your Majesty interfered on behalf of the public interests and the pnbiic morals of the country. and sent down to your Houses of Parliament the information which had been received respecting her Majesty's conduct ivbroad. To your Majesty, therefore, it would be superfinous, and consequently indecorous. to urge that persons of your milted station are nut raised to such eminent rank fur the purpose of involving their subjects in all their domestic differences ; but, viewing this difficult question as your Majesty has viewed it—namely, ss a matter of State—.we mast be permitted to expresa our doubts whether your Majesty has been wisely advised to bring it arward at all. It appears that rat Ma jesty's servants hays thought right to proceed against the Queen by a Bill of Pains sad P rn A t i", Par b e i t from as to canvass whether missy proceeding %%mid have cision. On a judicial proceeding own Judgment' on a la, donee in the judgment of tr. the House of Peers general) In the men who hare sd. forward this sorrowful bush brneght down the informs same men who examined strling themselves gear who are shout to decide and their own characters, charact..r of judges. There the prejudging of the case. of the litnrge—the (astir honours, even before any of a list of witneeees, charges ;—in abort, there nemlier which show an her power-ftl and almost What has been the universal as the air, that the an!, not to be tried ; a feeling are none hilt must applaud provoked it tot long the results. that if the Queen is sequitur far her triumph mar rise, mar sink: if she is condemned, indignation will pervade the pee will lose, in the first year of • of your inheritance—the he We cannot forget that given for the degradation bill, that to mark this mores. made to precede the divorce . con' than we are of the right of Parliament to alter the ette cession of the Crown : none respect more than we do the Art of Settlement, which took away the Crown from the hereditary successors, and fare it to the House of Brunswick. But we are not for liner awning a royal head without necessity : we see much to slam 'us in the example--nothing to console us in the imme diate bene6'. Why then—and this Is the end we humbly aim at —why rhould Queen Caroline be prosecuted at all its lone as she behaves with propriety in this country ?• From her future conduct your Majesty and the nation Kill be enabled to judge whether the reports from Milan were well-foundei, or whether they were the offspring of curiosity and malice. If the former, the nation will be at once supplied with a mason for in qniey, and deprived of much of its sympathy ; if, on the other hand, the Queen's conduct bears the test, your Majesty will have cause to rejoice that von have 'seed bee from humiliation, and preserved her front sentence which must destroy its hoe 411 Away, ant extintraisb for ever the care of her caution. Fug these reasons it would have been in 'our view more consistent with good morals and olds humanity if your Majesty's minister, when they first heard else sinister reports from Italy, instead of ofering the Queen a large Income to stay abroad, had WI - ere I her an increase of revenue to returu home. Nur must it be forgotten that your Majesty has already tier power of indicting a severe punishment. Your Majesty has the prerogative (and it is one with which the House of Commons refused to interfere) of •a clmling the Queen from your palace and your court. This most be a severe, it might be an unjust, +(Wiliest on any woman: but on the Queen it bears with pe culiar weight. The splendour of her rank, the at. tendant pomp of Majesty, the pre-eutineace of her station above all other females, are taken away and annulled at once by the simple pleasure of your Majesty. All who look for Court-preferment, all who are aurbitoua of the King's regard—all who fly to the side of power —all who are bound by nice---desert the Queen, without a doubt or a question on her behaviour. Her only resource is to unite a few friends about her, and to lire without ostentation, without homage, without authority. But, in addition to this, if she forfeited her reputation by her conduct. all women who have a regard for their own characters would instantly leave her ; she would receive nu favour in this respect. Is your Majesty not satisfied? With all the interested passions against her—with all the virtue of the ladies of Queen Charlotte's Court on the watch to take alarm-- conld not your Majesty safely leave the Queen, with the 'veleta of suspicion about her, in the midst of the so ciety of England ? Can there ben More painful situ ation ? Can there be a more dillicnlt trial ? If the habits of the Queen be In reality as degrading as the bill represents them, what can she dread more than to live in the moral atmosphere of England? We have endeavoured to make it Appear so your Ma. iritv, that the act by which it is propnseit to de — grade the Queen is not necessary to the State—that, on the MR trAry, it will be, to use the words of the House of Corm mons, "disappointing to the hopes of Parliament, dero eatery to the honour of the Crown, and injerions to the best interests of the empire." We also have attempted to show that another course is open. In recommending your Majesty to abstain front farther priweeilings, we give no opinion on the merits of the ease. We do nut ask your Majesty to retract any opinion you have form ed: we merely ask your Majesty to decline potting the Queen on the herd task of defeuding herself against foreign rumours, springing up in the course of six yes" and nursed into importance by a commission seat from England for the purpose. Your Majesty, we know full well. is too generals and too maenaninsons to pot any laelieation of your owe la the balance aoinat the real welfare of veer people. the last year the civil war. A new subject is the only Huai( wanting_ to eo ns idic w t e o lf f are pasTo u n i s rei bro re nrist . oar pe eo r it li n g try . to the verge el renew those passions in a inure dreadful form. Shy poor Majesty not furnish the oreasion! Already die be•ties who ed,lress the Queen ire called "Rail east" those who Wass lier are styled "preseteters sad raisminiators." By a single word year llarsty map dispel thir• imprisdinp storm. We, therefore, b lo wy pray WOW Majesty that you will be pleased to lame orders to prorogue the Parliament, and tiles pat as and to all proceedings at present penitinkapaleat tha (berg. And your petitioners will ever pray. La. • taw* in Ores boobies viol vat fare, t id aids eat pa. annum ; leo quid est lejustius Ciesee. See also Faber. ... .... _ __. . . --- 1 , 49 Cm . .. j. . .;\ . , ......s. •, 4 - , . ...:.‘,..:_- -4.....z i . - „I — . . , . • . --,.........- Patel skill* Pi writ. =11=MIGNI=7111111111•1113111160111111111 . proceeding UM 'Tote on aerie aw they often Ist , from motel- of others. And in whom 4 . 9 acridly place their tronli.lence tlyi,erl your Majesty to bring businees—lo the same men who Drma ion as ICCUSert— in OW led it in a secret committee, rod juror.—in the same men e on the conduct of the Queen, . firs, for a third time, in the 'here are other cite-matinee% 2 :Sae, by keying the Queen on,t sting her out from all royal y charge will marle..ethe refusal and of a specification of the . re are circumstances withont unfair bias is the mind. of t resistless ji:dges. consequence ? A feeling ,as t the Quests is to he aispremett reling so generous, that there tad its spirit. To those who results. Those resells must be, quitted, no man can say how se, or how low the nimsarzhy ndemned, a general feeling of . e the people, and your iiije.o7- :sr of your reign, the best part ! hearts of your subject.. at an example is about to he on of a Queen. We ere ;n the i. ore strongly, thedegradation is oree ; none pre more CORTibet"i I ~~ f Jand J. SIVRWRIUHT are.happy to state their • uatittaliiied approbation of the Contractor's Scheme for the New Lottery. which. though only for 6.600 Tickets. contains Two Prizes of 90.000/. ; besides which 11%10/. is added in EXTR A PRIZE.I4, all in STERLING MONEY, and will all be drawn in ONE DA Y. 30th August. :infamies at large allay be bad at all their Offices and Agents. es usual. hy which the Public will perceive the iudiciou4 manner in *high the Prizes are arranged for the benefit of every Pur chaser. J. and J. S. with their ustial Soceess sold and shared a great excel of Capital Prizes in the Lotter) conclude,' : —including T. 9.1414 . . • . . 90.000/. 14.313 . . . . 10.11001. At their old Offices. Nu'. 37. Corriliill; 11. Holborn: 3S, Haymarket ; and 141. Osfortl-street.