The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-07-31 00:00:00

.• ~s L.IIV INTELLIGENCE. —Qom — COURT OF CHANCERY, MONDAY. JULT The Loan CRANCELLOR came down to Lincoln's-inn so-day, for the first time since his Late indisposition.- Ilis Lordship did not sit in Court, but heard motions in his private room. KIRKPATRICK C. KIRKPATRICK. Mr. WINGFIELD said that a petition had been pre vented to the Master of the Rolls, praying that a pro po-eil marriage of an infant ward of the Court might be icrtired to the consideration of a Master of the Court. 1::s Honour had . dctennined that the petition could not I maintainetl, as his Lordship had on a former °tea •:on issued an ininnction to restrain tit* intercourse between the parties. The Master of the Rollt was willing to hear the petition, if his Lordship would re scind his former order, as an inducement to which he inight mention that all parties now consented to the marriage. The LORD CHANCILLOR asked whether the parties were the same u formerly? Mr. WINGATE replied that the parties were the same. The appiication was then granted. ;town V. STRATIINIORR. The AT roam ET-GENIRAL prayed that the costs of the proceedings in the House of Lords respecting the Strathmore peerage, as far as respected the infant, might be raid out of the trust estates. Jilr. [har suggested, that the costs of the present Earl of Strathmore, the uncle of the infant, should also be paid out of the fund arising from the trust estates, as he had an interest in them if the infant shonld die before coining of age. The LOGI, CILINcELLOR directed that the costs of both parties should he paid out of the estates. A cause in which the Honourable Newton Fellows was Elie Plaintiff, and the Earl of Portsmouth and others were the Defendants, next came on, and occu pied the attention of the Court till his Lordship rose at :t o'clock, at which time the pleadings were not finish ell. We shall report the case when completed. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. GLILDIIALL,Jvix 30. COX ASP OTHERS r. TROT. This was nu action upon a Bill of Exchange for 9391. The bill was drawn by Messrs. Stephen Roche and Co. ref iark, upon Matthew Tierney Itobarts and Co , of , Itaution, at 4;i day's sight : it was payable to the order of Michael Murphy ; and it was entlorceil by Murphy, lifeisrs. Cos, Weston, and Co. the plaintiffs. . ;the Stai.serrOa-Cit:xstiat, said that the action was beroight ender circumstances of some peculiarity, and it involved a question of great commercial importance. The bill, received by Messrs. Cox and Co. on the 21th of May, Is2o, was left on the same day for acceptance at the eounting-house of the drawers, Messrs. Tierney, Eubarts and Co. On the 27th of the same month it wae again called for; and in the mean time, the act had been done which gave rise to the present pro ceeding. The bill being left with Messrs. Tierney, liobaets awl Co. on the •Iftle of May, wits accepted by them on that day, payable at the house of Robarts, Curtis awl Co. but u.i the 25th of May, news arrived of lie failure of the drawers, Ilrsars. Ruche and Co.; sp.! Messrs. Tierney, Italians and Co. then endea voured, by obliteration, to cancel their acceptance. — The advert' note, just in the state in which it bad teen re delivered on the 2.7 th of May to the clerk of th. plaintiffs, would be produced in court; the at!em;iteil obliteration was in red ink ; but the accept avec riolerneatli was still visible; and the words '2;th July" (tile day when the bill fell due) had not tern bitted out at all. Now there would be no doubt, peon the production of the installment, that an accept- Lyre hail been actually made; and, as titatt..r of law (0:e Sulicitor-Genrral subtnifted) that act, once done, could not be retrarted. The learned Counsel con cluded by citing two eases from Espinass's I'Diers; --."llliornton e. Dick," an oliiiterated acceptance; an 4 " 'fawner r. Todd," la, re an acceptance hail been cut off. in those cases it had been decided, the ' Etat by Lord Eilenhorangh, onil the second by Lord Kenyon, that a party accepting a biil of exchange did at art whic:t he could not afterivaids rescind. The bill was r ig in and read. The defendant was to be the surviving partner in the house of IMattliew Tierney, Robins and l'o. Mr. F. Willis was clerk to the pl.:intitfs. On the -lth of May, lb2o, he left the bill in question at ti-e house of the defeadaats fur acceptance. tie put it — into' the box in the ordinary course, and :-ailed lot it a; on the 27th of May. Cross-examine:l.—The words "!27th July," ilenating tt-e day upon:fief the bill uv. tild fill wire not i-: the hand-wri ins of any of the plaintiffs, or of any cie:-k in thpir employ. :those words were not upon the bill (as-witness I;elietred) when he left it with the defendants. Mr. Coles said, I an attorney for the plaintiffs in CAA:4 action. 1 have examined the bill Pince it came fnmu the bands of the defendants. Fron► my know- Ildge of the facts I em enabled to toLt;:e out. uutku 11;e red inlZobliteration, the whole accepta►►ce ; but 1 tie net think that, without such previous knowledge, could make out so touch. - _ • Mr.'ScAsoasr submitted that soothing which the • fitness ptfiered kis knowledge cf facts—nothing that he saw-deAera ties immediate paper in questiob— couhl he evidence. 'The Lone Cniar Jelling was not disposed to go SO far. Ilialf the ill-writtea letters Trail in Court were vatte out from knowledge of what the be' ►oust be. Mr. SCARLIITT.--From the contest, perhaps, my The Lorin CEicr JCSTICY.-1 think from more. It I we! e to !we words indistinctly written upon that part a a bill of csck►nge where the acceptance commonly appears, I should more easily make cut their meaning, lhoin if I sa►c them upon a piet.c of blank paper. The ILjnrl leads the eve. Examination resumed.—l can make out, from look ing m the paper only, awl without any knowledge as to the fact, the words " 24th slay, ib21.)," and part i,i tl.e word " accepted." . _ Mr. Sc tiILFTT. for the defendant, begged first to • wreet an error into which the Learned Solicitor- Cenearal had fallen. Messrs. Roche and Co., the • • rawer* of the bill in question, did certainly bream. I , :chrupts abont the of Alm-, l:4211; but that fact v. 41 not known to Matthew Tierney, Kobarts and Co. nta the `9th of that month; consequently, not anti: i•cr the bill had keen re-delivered into the bands 4)1 be plai..:ttfs. Now, it teas evident, upon the test: mony isf 111 r. Coles. that, as the paper stood, nothing like a regular acceptances-add be disv,avered upon it; all, therefore, that the Jury could possibly take as proved would be, that the bill came, with blots upon it, from the bands of the defendants. What proof could that blotting afford of an acceptance, or even of an iutent to accept, by Messrs. Tierney, Roberts and Co. ? It might have been produced in twenty ways, and without any such intent. Suppose a clerk to have taken two bills out of the bill box at the same time, to have been desired to write an acceptance upon one of them, and to have begun writing it (or even to have finished writing it) upon the wrong, would that have been a case of acceptance ? But there was no need, the Learned Counsel continued, to labour that point, because be should show clearly, in despite of the Nisi Pries decisions of his Learned Friend the Soli citor-General, that a bill was never an accepted bill until it was delivered accepted. In the case of " Bentinck o. Dory," Lord Ellenborough said an acceptance made cannot be recalkd ; but the question is, when does the acceptance take place ?" Not (Mr. Scarlett contended) until after delivery. The SOLICITOR-GRNIRAL observed, that in the case of " Bentinck v. Dory," there bad been no decision. ;Ir. ScxeLETT referred to the case of making a bill of exchange. It had been held over and over again, that a bill was not made until after it was delivered. The LORD CHIEF JuA - rwr: rho:lan the question of law highly important: ti e bet•er coarse would be ti, put it into the shape of a ease, leaving the fact to the Jury whether there had or had not been an acceptance written upon the bill. The SuLictroa-Lit:NCIIAL admitted that the law was doubtful. . r. Si . intrrr assented to his Lordship's suggestion. The Loaf. Cum. JusTice then left the fact of a tvtitten acceptance to the Jury. T::e evidence of Mr. Coles. his 1.0,d,hp salt:, bad been given with great catMour and caution. The Jury had been told that an acceptance might be written upon a hill by miss take. If such hail been the fact in the present case, it would have been easy for the defendants to prove it. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs—Da mages 93 ,1. [The question whether delivery be or he not a ne cessary part of acceptance, of coarse remains to be decided.) BIRCH AND OTHERS r. Ttta AEI% OPFLET CREWE. This was an action by ,3lessrs. Birch, Moore, and Co., bankers. of Statio:alshire, against the defendant, a clergyman, residing in the same county, as the en dorser of sundry bills of exchange. The defence was, that the endorsements %%ere forgeries, and not in the hand-writing of Mr. Crewe. The case, as opened much in detail by the Solicitor General, was substantially this :—A Mr. William Berks, a cheese. factor and istaltster, near Stafford, be can, in the year Inl6, to do beisitoss with the plain tiffs. He began by bringing them bills drawn in his favour by the defendant, 31r. Miley Crewe, upon Drummond and Co., of London; and. front the known respectability of Mr. Crewe, these bills were readily diseminted. After scale time, Mr. Bells carded bills to the plaintiff's, drawn by himself upon persons in Londou ; and those bins were also discounted, the Stafford hank taking the precaution of withholding payment until their acceptance in Lawn %vas ascertain ed. To wait, h -ever, the transit of post between Stafford and LOIVIOiI, was ineonvenient ; and Mr. Berks fetid, "1 supp .se if Mr. Crewe would endorse these bills for we, you would pay them at once ?" The plaintiffs assented : and between the years ISIS and I t. 20, notes to the ansouut of near 40,00 W. drawn by Berks, chiefly upon a Mr. W. C. 11 right, of Lon don, and endnrsed by Mr. Crewe, were discounted, and, with two exceptions, duly paid. In those two cases (which were two bills for :011.1'. each) notice of disho nour was sent to Mr. Crewe, and the acceptances (through the medium of Ilerks) were at once taken up : no answer, however, was given by 3lr. Crewe to the I , •tt,rs of advice, nor did that gentleman ever appear to have appeared person ally in any of the transactions. Between Sep tember and December Pst!lf, bills to the amount of ; more than ten thousand pounds, bearing Mr. Crewe's endorsement, were disco u nted at various dates for fir. Berks. In the beginning of January in the present year, Mr. Berk. fled to America ; awl Mr. Crewe, be ing applied to as endorser, declared that he hail never hail any bill transactions with Berks—:hat the en dorsements purporting to be his were forgeries; and that Jerks had been carrying on a similar tratlic (using his, Mr. Crewe's name) with Alessrs. Sparrow, hankers, of Newcastle; and with 3lessrs.Sproutt and Co. bankers, at Nantwich. Now, such an allegation, the Solicitor- General said, coming from a man of Mr. t 'rewe's for tune, charactet and profession, could not but carry con sider?ble weight with it to the minds of the Jury. At the same time it was litnpossible (from circumstance.) that that statement shottid be founded in truth. Abler tions made by that gentleman in the course of the iii gniry would be shown to be at variance with fact, and witnesses most familiar with his hand-writing, would de clare their conviction that the i•olorsements were n fit ten by him. The bills upon which tits plaintiffs were prepared to proceed were nineteen in number ; and the gross amount was 4onlething under 9,0001. As to some of the notes, however, formal proof was wanting, and it was agreed to proceed upon those as to which evidence was ready, leaving it to be determined out of Comet (in ease of a verdict for the plaintiff') for what sums the plaintiffs were entitled to recover. Evidence of rather an intricate nature was then given at considerable length. The most material points were these 'wises swore to declarationson the part of Mr. Crewe, when first applied to &stile endorserof the hills i n question (declarationcas to the course of his money transactions with Berks) which stood in opposition to proem! facts. ft also appeared that, after Mr. Crewe (according to his his own account) knew that Ilerks bad forged upon him in all quarters, be neglected to take measures for his apprehension. Several witnesses, accustomed to see Mr. Crewe's I aid-writing, and among ethers the clerk of Alen rs Drummond and Co., his banker', fully believed that time endorsements proceeded upon were genuine. Upon cress-examination, however. one if those witnesses, ilk inspector of warrants of attor ney and such instrutnents, said that he believed the endorsements upon the nineteen bills (by whomsoever bey might have been written) to have been all wriwn with the same pen, as itli the 'auto ink, and at the .acne time. It appeared also, from the witnesses who poke to the declarations of the defendant, when sp illed to after the flight of Berks, that those declare ions formed part of a lengthy and snitch interrupted onversation. Mr. SCA. LETT, for the defendant, deser If ol l M r en eas this (the Learned C. unbars) personal a 3TAISV4I 4' gnaintance, and an aged gentleman of high phspert) and tespectabtiity. He slessied that say money deal ings bad existed between the dtfinsdaht and Heck% except that Berk% supplied Mt. Crewe with malt for his use, being paid for the same in bills, which bills, no doubt, were those first cartied by 'Jerks to Messrs Birch and Co. Upon those declarations of Mr. Crewe in conver sation, spoken to by two of the witnesses. Mr. Scar let% contecded, that those persons must have been mis taken, and complained that they bad visited the de fendant for the purpose of drawing him into unwary admissions. Mr. Crewe, who was a man averse to bn sinegs and of inclo!ent habits, had certainly abstained from exerting himself to get Herbs apprehended as soon as he became seqnainted with the freed which had been practised ; but that omission could not ren der him liable upon bills to which he was no party. — The evidence on the part of the plaintiffs as to the hand-writing was far from satisfactory (one witness indeed almost proved the defendant's case); but he (Mr. Scarlett) should give snob evidence to rebut the claim as would leave no doubt upon the wind of the Jury. Mr. 'fold Davison and Sir John Chet wode, both long aeyainted with 3lr. Crewe, examined the endorse ments in quegtion, and did not believe them (although there certainly was a strong resmblance) to be in the hand-writing of that gentleman. Mr. J. ('rewe (the defendant's son) declared that he had never heard of any money transactions between his lather and Mr. Herbs, except the payment for malt received. The defendant wrote a wretched hand, sel dom or never wrote his name twice alike ; Geyer had a decent pen in his Irons., acrd the ink in use was ge nerally impracticable. The endorsements in question were mostly written, with great sameness of character throagh the whole seties. itness decidedly he lirved that they were nut in the band-writing of his tither. The Ree. L. D. Coburn was distinctly of opinion that the indorsements were not those of the defendant. Mr. Mallet. an attorney, who had acted as collector for llr. C. Wright (upon whom the majority of the bills in qu?slion were drawn) produced bills to the amount of 10,0001. which had been drawn upon Wright Ire Berks. brt►eren 3lav Ib2o all those bills bore the endorsement imrporting to be that of Mr. Crewe --Erf:ev were prob.ll.lv those which been discounted by Berk, at manic,' and New castle.] The Lout) Uf:IEF Jrsvc, summed up the case, and left the whole, upon the evidence, to the Jury. The Jun•, after a few u►tautes consideration, found a verdict for the tl:leutlaut. S•icri:rvi r. liitoi:DEN.—lt is understood that as ra as the forms of law will admit, an application sr ml be ulnae to tim • Court of King's Bench for a new trial in the above r.in.r. ;Elle court-martial ortlerell to try Lietenant I. Fetcher, Fir%t Lieutenant of his Majesty's ship Tees, oil charges of "cruel, oppressive, and unoffieer-like con.lact totystyls several of the crew of that ship daring t he time he has belonged to her," cotnenenced its pro eeetlings on Tuesday, and on Wednesday the prose cution wis condoned. The Court met on Thursday prop,roto, and Oil Friday the Lieutenant entered on his defence, which was concluded in the course of the day, ani) sentence was prononnced as follows :—The Court is of opinion that the charge of cruelty has nut been proved against Lieutenant Fletcher, but the re maining part of the charge has been proved against hint, by his having inflicted punishment on some of the crew, contrary to the regulations and instructions relating to his Majesty's service at sea, and to the rtivoins of the Navy ; and as the offence falls within the 33.1 article of the art% and orders for the regula tion and better g overnment of Isis Majesty's navy and ships of war, and forces by sea, do:Is adjudge him to he dismissed from his Majesty's service accordingly ; but, in consideration of the very excellent character given to him by several officers, and as his offence ap pears to have arisen from the bad system of punish. ',tent which existen on hoard his Majesty's ship Tees, the Court strongly recommends him to the favourable consideration of the Lords Commissioners of the Ad miralty. Capt. J. 13.11ay, of the Queen Charlotte, President. ii N DF:rt-srmot.—Ota Monday se'nnight, the County of York te.ts visited by a Thunder-storm, which Was sareeeded he heavy showers of hail and rain. The thnueler was loud, and the lightning vivid. and in mane places destructive. At Marsk and Skelton (in leve!atirl) the lightning struck the house of .lr. Beardshaw, hut without doing much damage, and htorektol down, in the village Mr. Mackeretli, surgeon, of thrisintrough, who lay insensible for two or three minutes. Some haymakers in an adjoining field were also struck down but recovered. Several sheep n ere killed near Carnal's-, and two mild) c.,ws near York. On Sunday se'nnight, Mr. Gibson, of Boggy HAIL near Altiwick, had a mare and one sheep killed by the lightning, and a top struck, which it is feared will not recover. The mare was grazing in the middle of a field ; the hair was literally singed oil her body. On Friday week, a heavy storm of thunder and lightning visited liolnifirth, and did considerable in jury to the premises of Mr. Bates, at Wynneybank, near that place. Au uninhabited house, which was used as a warehouse, was struck about three o'clock in the morning ; the electric fluid, entering near the top of the house, shattered a stone door-way, threw down a chimney, and dislodged the coping of the roof, which was transported to the distance of twelve yards ; then passing- to the shear-room, it circulated round tile room, stripped the walls of their plaster, and finally found .an exit through the window. We are glad to say no personal injury was sustained. Oa the same day, about four o'clock in the afternoon, the village of Marningliam, near Bradford, was visited by a tremendous thunderstorm. The electric fluid tcrucli the diansion of E. C. Lister, Esq. of that place, and threw down a stack of chimnies ; it then passed through the dining room, in which about thirty per sons were assembled, many of whom were slightly struck. The only one seriously injured was a female servaa, wlio.4e arm was considerably scorched. Most of !he bell-witcs were melted, and the walls of the dining room still retain visible marks of the most ihrnring visitation.—(Leeds Mercury.) here is at this time a great mortality among the almon at the foot of the river ?ith. Whether it proceeds from the smallness of the river, or some other „atter, we know not; but they are found dead and de in great titt:uhers.—(lliitchtve.t Poeina.) POLICE. ffi6w-ernatt.e—Yesterday. 'Mows (We, a calk. shop keepet, living in Ship-yard, Temple-her, its convicted in the penalty of 5/. for suffering his shay 1 4 , be open within the hours prohibited by Act of Pari s . ment. After remaining in custody about three how, he paid the fine. Hugh Rogers, charged with defrauding George Dykes of two bills of exchange for the payment 501, each, natter pretence of obtaining for him a ation in the Excise, was fully eotnmitted for trial. We are concerned to state s that a melancholy acct. dent occurred in our river on Sunday last. A boat was run down by the Cambria steam-packet, off the Magazines: three fishermen were on board, of who* one was killed, and it is snppased by a blow from the paddle wheel; the two others saved themselves by scrambling up the side of the packet. A Coroneei Jury held over the hotly of the unfortunate sufferer, have returned a verdict of tusualaoghter against ti c Captain, on the ground that sufficient precaution not observed in keeping a look-out. It will he collected that it blew hard from the westward ; aai at the moment when all bands were occupied in hoists ing a sail, which obscured the view of the Captain's the helm, this fatal erent happened. Extralrdinas# as it may appear, t!:e boat was not even seen by one .1 the crew, or of the nittner.en• passengers on deck, till it was too late. We hope this unfortnnaie occurrence will induce all masters of steam vessels to keep one man constantly on watch, in the fore part of The deck, whilst navigating on the river—(Limp su t Coed icr.) INOPSIMON Or A GANG or Gsrstrs.—ln consetptenet of numerous depredations having been eommitted lately about the neighbourhoods of paolalisigton, E I ; iware Ilampstead. gm information was laid at the Vestry of Paddington parish, that gniitts of gr i esies hall pitched their tents" on Westbourne Green, and other parts adjacentiand there was no doalit that they were the per petrators of some recent daring offences that had been committed. Ilumplities anal a party of officers were alis. patched for the purpose of dispersing them; on their arrival they found various niartptees erected in ilistaitt fields, anal their swarthy initiates regaling. eiciiiselvea, The officers stated the nature of their errand, anal ortbe e.: them immediately to disperse, n hiih they promise* to do, but there being rather a strong party of despera does, the officers retired for the !merge of adding strength to their forces. As they were proceeding back again, however. the gypsies, who had laid wiit for them, made an attack upon the officers, and a desperate con flict was the consequence. The latter saietteeded in ap prehending two of the party, but the others escaped, !tacked up their tents, and walked ; the two prisoners were brought in custody to Mary-le bone office, where they underwent examination. They gave their names Smith anal Ruff. and were travelling gymies. Ruff was a desperate fellow, and defied the Magistrate to punish him by sending him to prison. Smith was less violent he expressed his sorrow for what had happened, and was discharged ; the other was comtnitted for want of bail Mr. Same! Walker, a preacher of one descripti of the Methodist Dissenters, tried at the New Bail Sessions, at Manchester, on a chartri; of noiyomuv,, preaching in the streets at Ashton under-I.rne, was found guilty, and sentenced by the Rev. Mr. Bev, Chairman, to three moNthe imprisonment in the ' of Correction. Friday morninr,, between four and five o'clock, Glasgow and neighbourhood were visited by a thunder storm, and heavy showers of rain for two hours, after a drought of about eight weeks. linzell, of Bristol, and Winter• flood, from Bath. This match was decided on Frill; on Durdham Down ; Bill Neat and Bob Watson emoted Hazen; and Mendoza and Bela% .o picked Winterflood. It was a manly fi g ht of forty-one notes; at starting, betting was three to two on WI terflood, who was considerably heavier than his ; versary; he placed sonic heavy right-km.lrd Ida: under the left ear which produced streams of clot and he kept the lead far the first seven rounds. H: sell's steadiness and science, however, soon gave 11l the advantage of IVinterflood's superior weight. the twenty-first round Winterflood, with his left peeper closed, wits piping for wind ; in the twent••-fourth was hit to a stand still, and cried e;mough. immediately shook hands with him. The ring crowded with amateurs ; and every species of convey. ante was in requisition, from the humble thinker cart to the barouche, and the veriest daisy from Kato wood to the thorough " bit of blood," forming a gro tesque and motley groupe. DIA rarsstxm: EvENT.—A more melancholy task never fallen to our hit than to record the death Mr. T. Forster, of Wells-road, near Bath, who by his own hand at about one o'clock o❑ Mon: morning. The deceased was a man of most amnia, manners; was greatly beloved by his fatuity, and inuc, respected by his numerous friends. Ile had been supping with sour. females at his own house (sae whom, a widow lady, possessed of a handsome fortu he Was shortly to have married), when left he room, and immediately afterward the report of a tol was heard in the garden underneath, where unfortunate man was found weltering in his blood quite death! He had placed the muzzle of a pock( pistol above his right car, and the ball lodged in ' brain. The cause assigued for this rash act is violent altercation with his intended bride; hut it supposed that it teas perpetrated in a moment of milli limit, occasioned by a violent attack of the gout, whim affected his brain. His spirits had latterly been mach impaired from the same cause, creating a desponder which it appears be could not overcome. It is possible to describe the consternation and agony his family at this fatal catastrophe ; bat 'aortae must fail to depict the distress of her who beheld ' man, who in a few days would have united his with her's, a bleeding and disfigured corpse —Verchre at the inquest, " Destroyed himself in a fit of temr rary derangement."—(Beittol Merelr.q.) MARRIED. Lately. at St. Ann's, Westminster, Mr. S. Rulmer, of ford-street, to Miss S. Harrison, of Kennington. At Massinglon. on Saturday last, George Rite Je' Esq. of the Bombay Engineers, to Harriet. cis:liner 0. Brett, Esq. of Grove House, 041 firompt )a. DIED. Yesterday. In Hill-street, Berkeley-square, Eleanor Sarah• the infant daughter of H. Brougham. Esq. M.P. tesseles r bitted. Prieto& .and Pablished at toe Ofter "Tut STarnawk!4" sad "Tits C ONSTITUT ION" 04 111411 Paper) 1416 194 Strand, *melte St. Cieteret's by R. WARINSIA. J 66., WO.: to Who s. CAD 11110,119sionsai to be addressed. =z: IS . . % .. g vl • this IP to arks. coss, ....:.ii mtg. tit a( N ° • 519 'hi. I. ENDICI' ma. SO, IRIS boat C SOAR() of M r lb. olotfa t Hone, whoa ' astssoosly : Th s tri Bet IX the ,i s •II T w ogi pe by Maio; to as lac meet ant *reed i rtlllotiois. Teter. • That ouch la+ it tit; , * the Beard is n was 'The melt au • tor we re. espoo l l i oe . ; cod 'The melt of hoist , 7 refidditall tits ro w -• ~ by a RI in . .., The at rat Shard • k, tat . re %stabil If h .. . Mob* Is rrente - will Id p one .: Rash I . the • • 1,. ' '1164 ... 1 .49 ' 64. j6b • hare milwilt a ti d w n i. !news Tisokthe Ow lately 110011abad 11 ... t : re i. r •ii ,i r ia r s. , 4\ ~ 4. ut. imam: IC: Relied ' IN)110 P. pmts ' Nobility. ie per- '. Is far l been i . IL of tla i their • prices list N, .10 ides L ifr t selves, . . Goode orthe , I ladies. mile* • o -spera- NSW 'titlin( . back we Pi 'them, ! , • NNW re con- ...k MODES in all- - -7, POLITIci .c.aped, lion of Inoners ' " • . arid F when: • .--late L l= • . ... ,.4 . 1.. II 1 : R a i I d u l t m e el s :: punish . t. of P iolenl; nd tvas r .. Royal Mil . 1 ,•The . e re sim baii t u t ! r bail. ► t. tit en ription . 1- . . Phi. T Hailer ' eisile° l 7 et' , that a 0 , , for •0, 0' Ma ;vas , . I Hon* . iro•er ...- • . 'clock, card th , • . to IN ,under • -‘" A 444 1 1 '.. l i a ll t it t .i e r n r r - ‘ lit ) I : ll4llW hi ps= ‘ W4 41"4411 , 111 1 4 1 4111 " Friday I olmisated ler slisailladi on qe- : :. h -• This w • s ;all ei) ' . ilistupiTTwo ne mi. a : I' 'is ad- ! . MOURN blows DIUM claret, tieteened for lams. liont-ro Ha- the Public. th re him ours, sod Is 1 pt. In re, to peeper of a sr - of real firth he ' and ( liar.ll • . whines, Ci in wa4 ...... est Boots, • • delicate artiel 'covey- 'virtues in si Pr cart .- ;IPM above it Kingq- or packet, I lido ard a gro- • S. ditto. I i diet isk has , row, oath of r *osoat-gartli rout, Boro 10 fell to-stn londay , ellaisr ,iniable . . gh• I 5 ea ; Herm i much wan, d lw. I been a; Bin %De Of 1-road 111, itatclith )rtulle, .....44'` o)ril lizeho he the t,_ , wow lit. Grc a yo 144 ford, p re •Notarket, Bea pis - blond, 11 4, • oat; Unswi ' t . tiregery. oil pocke• iruiver ; 114 I in his , anat. GAIN :t is il rite. ion. nilsaap ,• N at i t i 4 North-plate pf deli- 4 warehouse*: , whicli Old-street. . Pietedilly, u mach ditch. Bait nidency blatklue-ma is in. Teasple-bar • Bases, dile@ co n y ''„ Wisitethape In g na g` 1 . P. Leggin teld the lier, oilman I N i t :i e e s n r i d f p a ir o t e r t. ilirli flval ltaaserbstar, easb r eryi : l_7 W; ril l i of Or- Vitas ; t rtford, 1 i Jervis t army, to cr of J tioisitr ; De May, 0111111 Tart sad I --- . keessingt:ll or Sarah. eilisson; I Messrs. It p0........5• 'lliarrisoa. 4 Ogee e - Leo, Mr. :Belpre • II selider ais t lii Cowel sad by all il Cep ' voila. Nn weed. hourai-lotrati, is 11104 1166 • lay