The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-07-29 00:00:00

~'.. _. iVtAk (Ksti& MP i, kAA.'• • izi lc kA,ukt ,no crtmata P . n 4 LONDON, SATURDAY, JULY 29, 1820. " The Cause for which lIAMPDEN fell in the Field, and SYDNEY died on the Scaffold!" No• 4784. 1 11111 COIIINISSIONBILS of HIS MAJESTY'S t•CSTOMS hereby give notice, that on the ilth day they will he read) to reeeive Tenders from sorb Persons as may he willing to CONTIt I,CT for the EltiaTlON of OFPICES. on a portion of the site of the old Custom-house. The plans and speritirati o n, of th e wort,: will be ready fur inveetion at V.r Mier of the %or seror for Buildings, ('ustoin-lo.use. I...tidon, on Moods) Reit. 31st ins+. II) order of the tumutis.imters, cestom-hottse , London, Jely tt:r. In the seereter'.: al once. - T 0 FARMERS, Ikr.—To ht • l', on LEASE, for 7or II years. a compact Arahle FARM, ith a go od Farm-house and Offices, ithin a short distnnee of ',olden. Fur particulars applv. If by letter. rod paid. to m o o R. Stewart. let. Orval Russell-street, Bloomahurv. OTI(EOF SALE.—IMPORTANT AND EXTENSU E Piton:wry,- HERTS. Lir, • se E h l i F s Ulll ,l l : l e i d i r n e seesisrti:pinf.:eriumpstothriel) P. 41.11111 y i ?UMW AUCTION. same time in the month of Jolv ws opoWcrent Lola, the/Ws - era! Estntes, and Interests of srlia tie valuable and eatensite Manors, a capital Matt -1,10. H ow and Park, and snntlry Freehold and Cop. !..,1.4 Fyn, Owe in the %V% feral Parishes Aspeden, Inv Coltered. Vardle. and Mihail. in the County of Herts: coat:doing in the whole abobt fourteen h.indred acres of fine i widow. pasture, arable, and wood land, of the %Cue of /YOU per annum. or Ibireabouts. Park tints may befiod at the Seeretnry's °Mee. Auction Mart. Ldidon ; Angel, Bury St. Edmonds ; Ram. New market; Sun,"Cambridue; Three Cups. Colchester; Bell, Chelmsford ; Swan, Bedford ; ,Salisbury Arms, Iletflehl ; White Ilart, St. Alban's ; Green Mass, Barnet ; Salirhury Arms. Hertford ; Saracen's Head, Ware ; add of W. Leif cbi'd. Land and Timber Surveyor. Enfield. Aliddlesea. viewing the Estates, applieation sans be matte to Mr. 3latthea Woodwards, at Aspeden ; and Tickets to vier . the Mansion Mown end Gardens. may be had, on appliration, at thr Office of Messrs. Lamb and Co. :141. Princes-street, by the Bank, where a Plan of the Estate may be seen. LtßlClarlea JAPAN still triumphs in the [need Qf jest renown, by public %Oka° decreed! LAIL\ DERS and Company, sole Proprietors of the real Imperial Japan Blacking, &Iv appreciating the honour conferred on them in the decided retert•nce Riven to their Article of 3lanufacture„ by a generous and dis cerning Pvidic„ beg trine to tender the homage of their most grateful arknowleittrovents„ Hating been graciously pa tronized by his Royal Ili .'iness the Prince Regent. they are mow placed in the pre-eminent Nituation of Blacking Menu faeturers to his Majesty, andhnh e in consequence altered their label, by substitutiag WI the bottles. Re. the Royal Arms for thr Priori s Crest ; and more particularly to mark the dis tinction. their tames will henceforth appear on each label in FATPTIAN LETTIRS. The aboae inestimable Composition is still prepared and sold in°lnuit.. at their Original Warehouse, No. 9, Ship place, Temple Bar, Landon (both in li.intaid and Paste), ■t the following Prices, ♦iz. in bottles at ad. lud. Md. and Is. Id. each ; as Is also their much-approved Royal Bout-Tor Ligon; anti Retailed by all respectable Shopl - repers in the United kingdom. ;• Great Allowance to Nlereltaats, Captains. and others, for Exportation. ANGEL INN. Nr. Ci.isaaVes, STRAND. GENERAL OFFICE, FOR TR tA'F.I.I:ING. THE following MAILS and other COACHES gn from the above Inn : Paris Royal Mail, via Dover 'Tuesday and Friday Nights, at twelve. Portsmouth end Gosport Mail, through Godalming, Pe tersfield, and Portsea, every Evening at a quarter past 7. and t4undss et half past 6. On its 'Grits! a packet sails to the Isle of Wight. to eonvey passengers and pareels and a Mail Coach gets otto Chichester, through Drayton, Havant. Emsworth, ac. Gloucester and Milford Mail, through Henley, Oxford, and Cheltenham, every Esening a quarter past 7, Rod Sun day at half-past 6. Dover and Canterbury Mail, throogh Gravesend. Chat- Ism. sad Tel .-reborn. every evening at a quarter pg.! 7. and Sunday at halt past If. From Canterburv. passengers and par cels are ronleyed to Deal, Margate, - Ramsgate, Sandwich. ke.; and from Dover. parcels are conveyed to Folkstone. /hedge,. Myths.. Dimehurch, Romney. and Lyilti. Arundel and Bognor Post-coach. through Billingisurst, Monday. Wednesday. end Friday, a quarter before 7. Rath and Bristol Post-coach, to carry only four through Reading, Marlborough, Caine, and Chippenhain, curry Morning at 6. Bath Light Post-roach. In two days. to carry fear inside. through Maidenhead, Reading, Marlborough, Devizes, and Melkshain„ Monday. iVeginesday. and Friday Mornings. at R. This coach is chiefly intended for the acconsmodatiou of families, invalids, &e. who cannot undergo the fatigue of tech a distance ;n one day. Brighton Light Post-coach, through Reigate and Cack le's,. emery Morning at S. Cheltenham Post-coach, to tarry only four inside, through Healey sod Oxford. every Morning at n quarter before (I. Chichester, Bognor, and Petworth Port-roach, Monday, Wednesday, and Friday Mornings. at a quarter before 7. Dover and Canterbury Light Post-coach. Monday, Tees lay. Thursday, FridU. and Sunday Mornings, at 7. tiodd ming and Guildford Telegraph Coach. through Ash stead. Epsom, Leatherhead, Re. Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday Mornings, at 9. Godarming and Guildford new Coach. through Merrnw, Clandon, Horseley, Efflnghana. Lentherhgad, and Epsom, sten Afternoon at 3, except finntlay. Margate, Ramagate, Deal, Sandwich. and Rroadttairs Light Post-coach. Monday, Tuesday, Thursday. Friday. and Sunday Mornings, at 7. Godalming and Guildford Telegraph Coach. through Lupton. ninon, Cobham. and Ripley. on Monday, VI ed needs). and Friday Mornings, at 9. and every Sunday Morning at 7 precisely. and returns to London the same day flridgcnorth and Weisel Post Coach every Evening. Nianchester, Lancaster, Kieina I. Rochdale, Iluddersfield, Bradford, Leeds, Hallifax, Rotherham. and Sheffield, coaches, daily. NORTHERN COACHES. Caslisle, Penrith. and Whitehaven, Post Coseb, goes with Four Horses and a (luau) all the way. Passes through Brough, Appleby., Gretabridge, Richmond. Catterick, Ro edeghbridge, Wetherhy, Aberford, Doncaster, and Gran t am (the armrest way by 18 seta out every 'pursing, asd performs the journey with the greatest facility. Pastell ists &Adam! ou the road, by business or pleasare, have the p!caliu advantage of their seats being secured in the next. CARRIERS, To Twickenham, Rrentford. and Isieworth, every Mon day. Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday. EAMES and Co., Proprietors. Paresis and Packages are safely and expeditions') con veyed from this Inn to every City, Town, Village. and Couatry Seat lathe following Counties, viz.: —Rerks, Rucks, Cayman, Devon, Dorset, Hants. Hereford. Gloucester, .Left. Orabed. Sallaellet. Barney. Swami, Wits, Worcester, Wales. all parts of the Isle of Wight, Jersey, Ouern 'NY. led all parts of France; sad to ell Parts of the North • s • Take milk,. that se package. containing glut, china. plate, cash, or ftek latest, however small the lune, will be eceesated for, if hest or damaged; nor any "taw parcel or 's Wilma, of more Clan v aloe. anima rdlegivas such when delivered at the 011ics and poi 4 arara Neal Port-flakes, the. at the shortest motifs This day was published. NE SECONI) TOUR. of DR. STKTAT, VOL. 2. T POEM. Written by the same author, with designs h) the vatne artist. TOORAS RoWLA7.OSON, HICl e with the same arrangement of them b o th, h as produced original work with that title, price Vs. boards; published by R. Ackermann, 101. Strand. London,. publisher of the original 1)1t. SYNTAX, in seareh of the pieture..que, and may be bad of all the booksellers in the United kingdom ; also jolt pub ikhed as above, No. 4, Picturesque Illustrations of 111 [NOS Avess and kfoNve Vioro, containing four co loured engravings, viz. a Poem floi vs:, a Cosvnv of Winn McLrs, a FIsIIING FAMILY, 111111 WITICR CARTS, With *I pales, 4to. Elephant letter-press. prire 14s. UNci, No. 4, of theEmnLa,te f.tues, containing four highly coloured engravings, vit. STOCKOILL FORCE. and RVIR‘L W tree, with Y 4 pages of descriptive Letter press ; price d a isy It o . As. ditto Elephant, 10s. ed. Ct. %SWAT. EDUCATION. This Day was published,with Maps and numerous Engravings. price 61. bonnd, A GRAMMAR of CLASS! CA I. LITERATURE, Ell or ScnoLmes Kir' to the STUOV of the Lacts and UR ECK AVTIIOII. comprising a pieta and eomprehensise viva of ancient Cieography. Hiograph ) . Mythology. Man ners. Customs, and Antiquities, with SW promiscuous Ques tions for examinitinn. By WV JOHNSTONF.. Schoolmaster, of Stanmnre. A compendious volume. caleubsted to evitibit the know leilze contained in this Work, having always been a deside ratum in Classical Seminaries. this able. accurate. and elegstit volume cannot fail to meet w ith a general reception w Iterever the Classics are taught. It has sorrel) to be seen to com mand the approbation of el ery competent Judge. Printed for Sir Richard Phillips and Co., and to be had of all Booksellers. Of whom mac he had. Dr. ROBIN!44I , eS 'I%IM o(UNIVER ;AL HISTORY, With Tables, 6011 Questions. Alai's. &c. 4s. bound. Also, the saute Author's .%NrIENT and %Tonally II ISTONV. II 74. and Ni. respectively, with Nlapi ana numeroas En gra% logs. LAW I.VTELI.IGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Juir St Ws tt.n r. Teta WEST MitonenEx WATER-WORKS' COM PA `t T.—The arguments of Mr. ILrt and Mr. Wil !Ain were reported yesterday. Mr. lYtt.siam resumed his arguments this morning for the plaintiff, and was followed on the same side by Mr. PEMBERTON. The latter contended that this was analogous to a ease between lessor and lessee, that it was a case of stipttlatioit between the parties, from which it was not cumpeten: to the defendants now to reurile. NIT. Wvrsiener.L, for th.• defendants, denied that this case hail any sintiliarity to that between lessor and lessee. '1 here was no covenant between the ear tie.:, anal the Court was in fact caUrd upon to assess the rates at which the defendants ought to sinles s 1104 only the plaintiff, but every other inhabitant of the' parish of Marylebone, with the convenience of water. this was calling npon the Lord Chancellor to exercise a jurisdiction which be had never before assume , ' ; to I arbitrate between a public Company and private join vitlitals. Such an officer might be found to have 1 1 existed in the ancient republic of Rome, but the Legis- Lauer of this country had not yet II ght proper to create an arbiter of this kind. The learned counsel then referred to the two Arts of Parliament, by which the Company was constituted ; and after showing that the first was not repealed by any /imminent in the ,eeond, lie read passages from the affidavit of Mr. Knight, Chief Clerk to the Company, from which it appeared, that the rates now demanded, exceeded the old rates by only 25 per rent. and that until these rates were established, the Company received nothing like a fair remuneration for their capital. The affi davit went on to state, thitt the rates demanded from the plaintiff amounted to no more than Iris. fid. half yearly, a sum less than was paid years ago to the New River Company. It was thrown out, that a com bination had been entered into by the several Com panies, for the purpose of raising the rates. That imputation was fully repelled in the affidavit, where the connexion of the Companies was stated to hare arisen from different motives, and from which it ap peared that the defendants, in all their arrangements acted under the firm persuasion that those arrange ments would be as beneficial to the public as to them selves, for they enabled the 'Company to supply the water with more certainty, purity, anal abundance, than before. He did not contend, that where several' Companies united, there might not have been oppor- 1 Utilities for alms-. But the question here was, whe ther in point of fact, any such abuse had occurred. It was clear, he thought that one or two Companies could supply water upon cheaper terms than three or four different Companies, because, in the latter case, there would be so many different establishments, which would necessarily demand indemnity for their separate expenses. One or two steam engines were less expensive than four, and so of the other articles necessary to an establishment of this nature. With regard to the reasonableness of the rate, he had the opinion of the House of Commons in favour of that which was fixed by the Company, and which did not exceed filar per cent. on their capital. The Court' knew there were public under takings where the Legislature permitted a re turn of 10 per cent. on the capital. He might men tion as instances, the London Docks, the East and West India Docks. In those cases Parliament fixed a maximum of 10 per rent. and yet a return of 4 tent. in the present case was deemed by some persons ni warrgntable. The litigation about these Water-works had given rise to a paper war, which was carried on with much vigour on both sides; in one of these pub lications it was stated, that •' Parliament was the only place where these differences could be settled." That observation was perfectly trite—it came from the other side, and yet being convinced of this truth, they came into this Court to cloak the Lord CIANCRI.I.OII with a jurisdiction he had never assume d before. Is the House of Commons the Bill was introduced by Mr. M. ANGULO TAYLOR, after being recommended by a Committee, containing the names of some of the Most respectable Members of that House, and of bient hers, some of whom were interested in beating down this exborbitant demand of the Company. If it reallv were any snch thing. But instead of lessening that rate, they expressed their opinion, that it was a rea sonable rats, and after such an opinion it was nut only injurious, but improper, fur any persons to in struct Counsel to come forward in this Court and throw odium on this Company as if it had been guilty of some monstrous itursition. The Company were ready to assent to a mei-imam if it was deemed neces sary,and they undoubtedly had some right to complain that those who tiled this bill when they were beat out of Parliament, should come to this Court and call on his Lordship to ;arbitrate between them, and to give as many issues for trial as there were inhabitants in the district to which the works supply water. If the plaintiff should succeed in getting his rates reduced by ills, the Court would drive the Company back to that situation in which their returns would not equal their outgoings. He hoped, however, that whatever disputes the parties might have elsewhere, they would get no encouragement to bring them again into the Court of Chancery. The Loup Cit.ttscat.Lost asked whether the contract for the Company with the plaintiff was half-yearly or otherwise. It was answered that the contract was half-yearly, and that the plaintiff had received notice that his pipe would be severed from the main pipe at Christmas next, if he did not pay the rate demanded by the Com pany. The LORD Cu A straw:in Observed, that he had asked the question under the impression that the Company threatened to cut uff the pipe to-day or to-morrow. .\s the notice was so distant, he was happy to think, that however he should decide, there would be an op portunity for further hearing the matter before the injury could be done. Mr. HEALD followed on the same side with Mr. WITHIRILL, and ob 41, that as he had collected the opinion of the Court to be in favour of the side on which he argued, he should scarcely have thought it necessary to trouble the Court with any further obser vations. He feared indeed in doing so, that he a ould be trespassing on the patience of the Court. A noble and learned Lord who had been latch• Chief Justice in the King's Bench, said. that though he had made up his mind as to his decision. he would still endure the further arguments of Counsel. The Loan Cnancau.on.—As to that expression, Mr. Heald, whatever may hare been the conduct of' others, I can only say, that when I retire f this Court, and that in the common course of things cem ent( he very far distant, if there be any one circum stance in my judicial life upon which I reflect with satisfaction, it is this, that I have been always anxious to bear patiently all parties. Lord Thurlow used to say, that he would never refuse to bear what Counsel hail to urge, because as it was their duty to think al t the matter, before coming into Coati. That noble and learned Lord also said, that when his mind was made up, still he would hear the Counsel even upon that side to which his decision inclined, in order to have its propriety still further sifted. (In some of these occa sions, Lord Thurlow told hint (the Lord Chatwellor) that the arguments he had used for his clients con vinced him that instead of deciding for, he ought to decide against them. Mr. Ilitst.a observed, that in this ease the opinion of the Court was s u decidedly in favour of his clients. The Loan CHANcaLt.oa.—l an► not decided till you are done. Mr. Maui then proceeded to s'irty the inconveni ence which would arise if the Court were to grant an issue to every inhabitant who was disposed to contest the rates and passed a strong eulogy on the Compa ny, who demanded no more than 4 per cent, on their capital. Ile traced out the origin of the competition, which terminated in the establishment of the present Company. It arose frAm the Act of Parliament passed in the year lel7, for the better paving the streets of the metropolis, which act enjoined that no pipes should in future b.. laid down for the conveyance of water, except iron pipes. The pipes of the New River Company and of the Chelsea Water Works, had been all Wood, and were very much decayed. They found great inconvenience in joining iron to wooden pipes, and the expense of laying down all iron pipes were too much for them to bear they ac cording►ly withdrew. The Wand Junction Water Works never supplied water to any great extent in time district supplied by the preteut Company, and they agreed that that Company coold supply the district on terms more advantageous to them selves and the public, than they could, and for that reason they retired front the district, This was the whole history of whet was so us:ustly called a combination to raise the price of wat.•r, against which the plaintiff stood first as the champion of Mary le-bone. 'I be Learned Counsel then read several pas sages from Mr. Knight's affidavit, from which it ap peared, that up to the Ist March, 1819, the Company had lost no less a sum than 113,0001. in the shape of interest on their capital, in consequence of the reduced rates which were the consequence of competition,— Even when the rates were increased, they produced no more than 4 per cent. and this at a time when they supplied four times the quantity of water which was supplied by the New River Company. That ('ompany charged a rate of 30s. a-year fur four times less water, so that for 71. more, viz, for 375. a year, the pr..sent Company supplied four times more water. The capi tal of the Company amounted to half a million. They ne►er increased the rates on the poorer classes, and in all their arrangements they had such a view to the public benefit, that instead of being charged as rigid monopolists, they deserved the thanks of the public. Mr. NORTON NINOWOII OM the SSW side. Mr. Thum replied. 1 be Lord clllAscauwa. after some general obertes dole, proceeded to say, that thoogb the presrut I'lo - was wade ost behalf of the plaintiff sad the other lILLIOTT Mr.BeLi. stated, on the vied lady, that she bad been bequeathed, during her children, the dividends arisii 3 per Cent. Bank Annuities. family being in some enil husband in an assignment dends to the present defendant ation, and in the year if her husband, assigned the this gentlemen, during he the present year, Mr. Elli ons misfortunes, became , was advised that she, being maintenance by the cnndi ' ' was reduced, had an equit which had been assigned consequence was, that she assert this claim. Ihe Learned of the claim, contended client to file a bill of this tent to her to file it against . an assignee of a life estate. cases determined before wicke, Thorlow, and Eldon, out hf that upon Had , posed any di the assi; right ' Court • disposed He cunr was hel the fut many es, .ng down dreds pertivs. Mr concurred taken your lay down no instance his alleged cause to afford how could - • ................ ............lIIIi ...._..w...,. ... ' \ . 1.4 *or t 4:.... I , . ' i . ~ e fti tr . A .e. _.. J •, .- .".. lA, '*.‘• • 1 4 A I '.., .7. .' • lar4- ‘. 1 • %t= . / 4 T-.. " • .; 4 4 *Nt s e gel . • ' 4 1 11 , , , . , :• I. I , .1 ,k' .1 . 1 . ~ . _ PRICE SEVEN PENCE. . , 4 .. %,: habitants of the parish o f bl ar yl e b one , y et b y t h e des of the Court, he could only consider the Bill as 'at of the plaintiff alone, because he came here only • 1 i the ground of his own contract. After reading the • •ctioni of the Act, in which it is p rov id e d, t h at th e tea shall be such as are " mutually agreed up ot i," . I • I • • observed, that in common sense, that mutual agree- , rnt depended on the particular circumstances of each habitant's necessity for a greater or smaller quantity ~ ' water, on the bore of the pipe and on other considc- tions, from which it followed, that the contract with • to might be extremely different from the contract i s i ith another. The clause also proved, that the whol ght of any inhabitant to a supply of water, originate I ' 4 ''' 1 • direly in the contract, into which he entered with • i ! e Company: from which it appeared, that the Le- J slature, in passing the Act, did not contemplate the • 1 `I 'continuance or refusal of that supply by the Cow- • ny as an irreparable injury to the inhabitant. In is Act also it was provided, that in certain cases, mely, where the rate was refused, where the ii.- • • .hitant supplied by the Company did of himself sup- .. y part of the water to any other person, In these ses penalties were provided in the latter, and in . . Cher it was declared lawful for the Company to serer • I e pipe of such inhabitant, It was therefore impos- )le for him to suppose that the Legislature looked on the refusal or discontinuance of the supply to bs' i 1 ch an irreparable injury as would bring it under e jurisdiction of this Court. Besides, it was vt ry portant to observe that there was nothing in this t. ct which would authorise him to compel any person take water from this Company; on the other hand, 1 could not find any thing in the Act which woul.l thorise him to compel the Company to supply water any inhabitant, if they chose to refuse it. Under ese circumstances he was of opinion that he could ot grant this injunction. I Motion refused. I -...... VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT:4I3.e 29. . KLLIOTT C. CORDILL. Mr. BaLI. stated, on the part of the plaintiff, a mar- td lady, that she bad been shortly after her marriage queathed, during her life, with remainder to her ildren, the dividends arising out of 90001. Imperial •• per Cent. Bank Annuities. In the year 1806, her nily being in some embarrassment, she joined her tsband in an assignment of a portion of the disi- 1 ads to the present defendant for a valuable consider- ion, and in the year lel 13, she, in conjunction with 1 r husband, assigned the whole of the dividends en • 0 1 .' is gentlemen, during her life. In the beginning of e present year, Mr. Elliott, in consequence of rani- . • .5 misfortunes, became a bankrupt, when the plaintiff IS advised that she, being deprived of all means of dintenance by the condition to which her husband '' . is rednceil, had an equitable claim on the property ; iich had been assigned to the defendant, and the I -,sequence was, that she filed a -bill in Chancery to sect this claim. 'I he Learned Uentleman, in support the claim, contended that it was competent to his eat to file a bill of this nature—that it was coupe- st to her to file it against a particular assignee, and assignee of a life estate. He cited a numb, r of ses determined before Lords Northington, Hard- eke, Thurlow, and Eldon, for the purpose of making t his case. Mr. HAtsT maintained, on behalf of the defen,lint, at the plaintiff in this case had no power of calling on the Court for the relief which she prayed for. id the fluids been in Court, and about to be dis- setl of, she might be admitted to be beard against v disposal of them to her prejudice. If, at the time r assignment was making, she insisted upon, her rht to a settlement, even then the utmost that a ' , • met could do was, not to suffer the property to bc 'posed of without provision for her maintenance. 1 • contended, that if the title of the assignee which 11 is held to be good so long, and in reliance of winch . e funds in question had been now involved iu so my establishments were subverted, it would be lay- g down a principle, calculated to give alarm to him- '.l . Hs that were now in quiet possession of their I pro- •• . rties. i Mr. HARBIN followed on the same side, and entirely ncurred with Mr. Hart in the view which he had ;en of thie ease. If the Court were decided in fi- lar of the plaintiff, the principle which it would thus .•.../ „ i • r down would go to the extent of declaring, that in 1 .;:.. instance could a husband aleniate the property of t nife. Seven years ago it would not have been a eged that this Lady had an equity on the funds, be- use the circumstanoes of the husband were such as afford her every prospect of good maintenance—bas w was it possible that the title of the defendant old he altered by events over which be could has'. . possible contralti? The Vice Cuancet.Loa said that in a case where • rre was a gross , fund belonging to a wife its her , n right, and about to be disposed of by the bus- ed, a Court of Equity could reclaim that fund and ntroul the power of the husband over it, so as to • sure a maintenance to her. But here was a life operty alienated by her own consent, and not in art. He thought if he were to decide that the timid' should have an equity upon it, the prinvi- , .... r would prove very detrimental to the int e rrsts of . e public. Before, however, he should 11n1Wensiss important a point, he should take time OD MN* , r. At present, the inclination of his mind uss . . at he should not make such a principle. . . His Honour did not rise till past 5 o'clock. 1 ..........—...—....., .. , • Th . Spanish p atc i o tts Society, established the Ist . sta Thermiay ut,asdco , ns at i t tug oi r d a bee tirl on of i ns a native* mo tiv ull aisso. .1 . Spada, .• it i i irate the opening of the Cartes , at mill stk.. t 1 issai kgaa insa t tu d Ain ta c a: aibas r. 7d its , Lted sad le preside acy the in Duk es ie s,c r igi u sty. , 4 1 , 0 . Iso ponil The ' there own band, rontroul ensure . property Court. plaintiff ple woulk the public. so important der. that His The imam,_ net Thareday. aerate -- elegant 1 Spanish was le ' 4' 1-