The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-08-15 00:00:00

• A 1 , • •. . years ago, and it was some time before the affairs he. came greatly embarrassed; tot not long since, in the - present year, a General Meeting of Proprietors was held, and a Special or Select Committee was then named, to inspect the real state of the emirs of the concern. They reported on the Bth June. 181 S, and among 550 proprietors, many of whom held only one or two shares, and did not give themselves mach trou ble about them, this small body of active individuals obtained considerable influence; but such a body was not recognised in either of the Acts ; they were not even referred to, and although they might report, they could have no pretensions to direct. They found debts to the amount of 80.0001., and sums due upon bonds to the extent of 24,0001., and they recommended a reduction in salaries, &c., which, for aught they knew, the Sub-Committee intended to effect. They added, what no doubt was very sensi ble advice, that a well-grounded hope of suc. cess must depend more upon increased attrac- Cott than upon diminished eapenditure ; and con cluded with the strange proposition, that no attempt should be made to open the Theatre in the ensuing season without some previous arrangement with the creditors. By the creditors, they must mean all the creditors, and yet they themselves only proposed to pay 17,0001. out of 80,0001., which, at 10s. in the pound, which some had agreed to take, would onlj deduct 31.0001. . This was all they could do, sad because this had not been done, the doors of the house were to be hammered up; and to carry this notable project into ezectition, the Court of Chats eery was applied to. They went on to add, that the system of management must be changed, end here day-light began to appear. Now, it began to be evi dent, that a job was at Ih...bottom of their recom mendation, for they subjoined in their Report, that during the ensuing season the affairs of the Theatre ought to be subject to the management of one per. son only, who was to possess all the power previ ously exercised by the Sub. Committee. That was to say, that the Sub-Committee ought to be done sway with; but the proper and onls place to apply tones the Legislature, to repeal the Act which expressly appointed that. Sub-Committee A Resolution to the above effect was afterwards passed by the Pro prietors, hut it was all waste paper, and while the Acts remained in force, had and could have no more effect than the ballad of Robin flood. However,the proposition (originating probably in Messrs. Ellis and Cocker) they thought vastly better than any legisla. tire provision. 'l'he Select Committee talked out their duties—what duties? Their duty in suggesting the alterations of the very principles on which the Theatre was conducted? How did it become their duty ? It did not become so because they had assumed it ; .tor did it follow that it was expedient to raise 17,0001. by sale or mortgage, because they had thought fit to contract for the payment of a favoured few of the creditors of the concern. What right had they to say that the Theatre should not be opened until 10e. in the pound were paid? Or what right had they to give an opinion that the management ought to be intrusted to one dictator? It soon after ward appeared,. that Mr. Column was the Wiwi. dual they had pitched , . upon. Ile was, no doubt, • most experienced man in theatrical aff;irs, and a matt of 1141 t talent; perhaps uneaceptiooable : but, sup - posiog the Sub-Committee had yielded; suppoaing they had consented te • the trial of tats Mild scheme, what could they have seta to any man who had embark ed his property in their heatre—to any widow with a family sihese sole dependence was in its emcees, if it had failed ? Were Mf. Coleman the wealthiist man In London, it did not at 101 follow that the SUb Com. mittee were bound to trust him'; and the suggestion would seem preposterous to rho verieSt tyro of the prraog.ion. LI sass not true that too great facility had been shown in obtaining articles from trades-limp'. ; and many other parts of the Report, as applied to the present Sob- Committee, were equally unfounded. The Learned Counsel the., entered into . a mote par. ticular detail of the CR11142916 of .the Report of the Select 'Committee, and of the proceediugs had upon it, which are already before the Public. Ile after wards referred to the contents of the answer put in by the Defendants, by which it appeared that when they 'came into office a estm of 61,0001. was due to various -Creditors :tt was not necessary to go through it, asi the chief facts were known, hut the whole equity of the bill was flatly decried. A point had been made that the Sub-Committee were not validly chosen ; that their nomination was not, as the Act re. qui•-ed, submitted to the general body of Proprietors; the first Sub-Committee had been so confirmed, but since that time it had been renewed by filling up vacancies, and it was wholly needless. The LORD CHANCELLOR—The General Committee of 21 are to name five members for the Sob• Com• mitre's, and supposing that their choice is to he con firmed; I wish to know whether the plats of the St.h. Committee, when so formed, is subject to the revisal of the body at larg , ? Sir S. RoantLy—Certainly net. The LORD CHANCELLOR—There is no express clause for the approbation of the Sub-Committee ; but I understand then, that when the Committee is once legally formed, all the powers of management are invested in it. Sir S. Romtxxv—Yes, with power. to make con tracts to bind all the Proprietors. Sir A. PIGGOTT further submitted, that the Court could not proceed merely upon the ground that the Theatre was embarrasied ; for there could he nothing more absurd than to dote it ender such circum. stances, and prevent the possibility of profit. The Defendants had 90 shares among them; and of course they 'had a deep interest tit _making lite concern ad vantageous: no specific charge of atismanagement was attempted, and the general accasittions were all distinctly contradicted: . They. "did not wish to employ unnecessary performers f -but men of talents must be paid their equivalent, and "Jew were judges of the real merits of actors. it efts admitted that the sum of nee thousand pounds world • be wanted to open the Theatre again, and Mr. P. Moore was . ready to furnish it, in the hope that the eeason would be soccessfel. It was - qeite clear that the parties now bringing this matter. before his Lordship did not act merely because they bad the interests of the Pro. prietors at heart : these projects and speculations were not invented and attempted to be enforced for nothing; the eight Plaintiffs espected to have their quid pro quo in some way or other out of the concern ; but he hoped that nothing his Lordship should think it right .~---~ - rlirr, ST V' Fg744A1 41 %OM to do would hate the effect of forwarding their inju rious schemes. Here the Learned Counsel conclud ed by expressing his confident hope that the Injunc (too would be dissolved ; but, after he had sat down, he begged to state a few passages out of the answer, to which he had not sufficiently directed his Lord. ship's attention. They referred to the necessity of keeping the Theatre open for the sake of paying the annual charges upon it ; the rent and taxes exceeded 3,0001. a-year, and the sum to he paid to Renters for 80 years was 3,7501. The Sub-Committee had not made any positive engagement but with MOH Cubit and Mr. Stephen Kemble, who was to be Siegel Manager at 4001. a year, and 101. per cent. upon. the profits. • 'The Learned Counsel also read the clause of the At t of 52 Gen. 111. relating to the ap pointment of the Sub-Committee, contending that the approbation of that body by the Proprietors only applied to the first Sub-Committee after the Theatre was re-bui't. Sir S. Rosittuv, on the other side, commenced by observiwg, that it would be quite unnecessary for him to occupy needy so large a portion of his Lordship's time as his adversary had employed : his Lordship's order that only one Counsel for each party should he heard hail hitherto been of little avail, for Sir A. Piggott had consumed at least as many hours as would have been engaged in this question, if each of his Learned Coadjutors had been beard. [Sir A. Piggott spoke for two hours.] He had certainly had a diffi cult task to answer the case on behalf of the Injunc ' Lion, and he (Sir S. Hominy) had more reason to complain of the spirit of the address just delivered, than of its arguments. What had produced the as perity, the sarcasm, and almost the ill-humour dis. played by his Learned Friend, he could not, imagine. Why he imputed to- the Plaintiffs any intention to makes job of the Theatre, and that they slid not act for the benefit of the generel body of Proprietors, but for their own private views, he (Sir S. Romilly)could not guess. In the case there was certainly nothteg to warrant the supposition, and the object really seemed to be to make a vain attempt to prejotlice his Lordship's mind. The first objection made was to ;he want of parties; that the Duke of Devonshire, anti the several iticumberancers, had .not not. been made defendants; but it was unnecessary to snakier it, be cause, if it were a defect, it could he remedied. to. , morrow without even the necessity of an appeatauce His Learned Friend's anger was probably only the anger of those who instructed him, who spoke through him, who breathed it tutu_ him, like the vile dream into the ear of Fre. [Nlr Peter Mo - ore sat just behind Sir Arthur . Piggott.] The general merits lay in a very narrow compass : the Plsintiffs did not come forward itt their itolivi• dual capacities, but to carry into execution, on be half of themselves and others, certain Resolutions passed by a great majority at a General Meeting : this was the ordinary course, and if the Acts gave the Select Committee no authority as a recognised body, he should he glad to know what part of them pro hibited a large assembly from appointing certain per sons among them a Committee, to enquire into and report upon certain facts ? The acts of that Com mittee, it was true, were nothing without the adop tion of the general body ; but they had been adopted, and all objection upon that ground was therefore removed. Sir A. Piggott had represented this as the application of Messrs. Cocker and Ellis, who were Proprietors and Solicitors of high respectability. It was not their application more than th a t o f the Hon. Mr. Lamb or Mr. C. , lcraft. Surely, his Learned Friend did lint expect here again to attempt to pre. judice the mind of his Lordship : if they were Soli• citors, why might the) trot come before the Court ? It was said, that a Welch Judge once thus addressed a Welch Jur) Gentlemen, it is unnece•sary in this case to call arty witnesses ; it is extremely short —it is an action by a •rich attorney against a poor widow, and you -will of course find your verdict for the Defendant." Sir - Arthur Piggott could not surely expect that his Lordship would enter• lain the same unreasonable bias against parties because they happened to belong to a most se. spectable profession. The truth, however,. was, hat neither Mr. Cocker nor Mr. Ellis had ever taken any part in these proceedings until after the Bth of July. It had been represented that this propo. sition was absurd, monstrous, extravagant, notable, with other terms of contempt and derision totally in applicable; that it was to shut up the Theatre for ever, and to put en end to all hope of emolument. — Not the slightest imputation was cast upon the Mem bers of the Sub-Committee further than incompe tence ; they had nothing to gain by their mismanale ment, though the Proprie ors hail a great deal to lose; they might possess talents to govern Se nates, or even to sway empires ; and all that was Said was, that they did not understand the affairs of a Therm,. TS(' great body of Proprietors feared that• their mis management would be ruinous to the establishment, and by this motion they were desirous only of avert ing that impending ruin. His Learned Friend had said much, but explained little, about some secret job, some private end to be gained by the removal of the present administration of the Theatre: no doubt the secretary of state of that aricniniatration, the first lord of the treasury, the chancellor of the exche quer, and all the other officers, were like other great personages, willing to stick to their seats as long as possible, and no others were anxious to get into their places; but it did not always follow, as his Learned Friend Oust know, that pecuniary motives influ►nced, this desire; the love of power was stronger than the love of pelf,and, - whatever the joh might be; it was clea r that it was not a corrupt one. The Prope;etors only wished io interfere because they had a great stake in the concern, and the true and avowed purpose of the Injunction was to take the management out of the •handi that now held it. The LORD CuANCELLOR.-It should seem -that with this theatrical administration the Great Seal is in commission: the act places it in the hands of five. Sir S. itoramr.v.—The Keeper of the Conscience, I take it, is my Learned Friend Mr. Wilson. Sir A. PIGGOTT said, that he certainly could not use the Great Seal. Sir S. Komi LLY contintied.—lt did nut appear that the Keeper of the Conscience had much conscience in his treatment of the creditors, whom he wait unw filling to pay their lawful demands even as far as they could be satisfied. CA .short conver.ation lIPTP took place, as to the precise words of Mr. Rubin►'s affidavit, as to the injury the Company would receive if the we. .. . , Sir sn.agnefimieninitlywceorieo:nodoeidie,utehdatinhetheimporeresset.sthtahtatn4l.cc.. nut. Sirpan A y .o fr, Proprietors Piggott insi s insisted, thati a n d h e tr o o n ti l cd . might sustain injury. . On referent* to -the o ffi ce copy, we believe that it ties in both ways.— I s u a s kd tai 4 li a .a th rY e; The point was of little • impoiiinee, excepting that the other side relied upou it : the facts, however, proved it; for, with the exception of only one year, the Theatre had been a losing concern from the first season it opened. The debt wss now 80,0001. and though it was true that when ,the Defendants clime Into office, 61,0001. of that had been incurred, yet they could not deny that the remainder, viz. 19 0001. was a debt contracted during their administration. Was not that then a loosing concern ; end what pro.' spect was there that it would not so continue, as at present conducted ? What answer could be given to that ? None ; and none had been attempted, ex cepting that It was asserted that the Plaintiffs wished to shut op the Theatre for ever: this was, however, a mistake; but suppose they did wish to put an end to the concern entirely, would it not be again to pot an end to a loss which the Theatre had long been ? It was asked, how then can you pay the performers —how can you pay the bills of the tradesinen Cer tainly not ; but no new bills would then be incurred, nn new debts contracted; and it was not because a despotic triumvirate wished to go on from bad to worse, by adding new burdens, that it was to be pee -1 milted. But, cried Mr. Moore, "if money is want ! ed, byre it is. Here I offer you a thousand pounds with which you may open the house." But would a single thousand pay debts to eighty times the 1 1 amount, or would it do what the Select Com.' mates pinpesed, would it relieve the establishment from 34,0001. by actually disbursing 17,0001. at. the- rate of ten shillings in the pound. Mr. Moore'i L00M...0r such an undertaking wus about upon ti pet-wilt the design of certain disaffected persons wlto,' l wilka !Tertiary of 101. 6s. Bd., set about overturning' a mighty monarchy. Mr. Moore had advanced 1001. la,t }PIN . but it had only been injurious, for not only that was lost, bat many ethers went after it, and the effect of it again would, probably be to keep the house open until a few of the most angry creditors .could send in executions to sweep away the wardrobe and the scenery. If 'afterwards the Public would roe''e to see their plays, wide the actors were with out dresses and the stage with bare walls, so much the better for Mr. Macre and his coadjutors. The answer of the D. residents clerkly 'admitted, that they could not proceed without ealesoz mortgage ;lied yet what did they risk but t hit thiiltiaiiiiiiters wider their steerage should embark egein in certain ruin ? Theo. who had obtained the Injunction dial not, however, wish that the 'Theatre should bii shot fur ever : they only required that a pause' . should be made, during vr.dch some hungry eiteditiris . might be satisfied by the pay ment of 17,0001. instead of 34.0001., for with those crelitois a positive slid very advantageous agreement had been mar'e by the select Committee. Therefore, the wotiderfuk, notable, extravagant, absurd proposition was this, and 'lto.' thing else—that a pause should be made (of the.sikii, of a clear gain rf 17,0001. A great majority 'of Proprietors had thought the plan neither absuid `it o r extravagant, hut advisable; and though neither be• (Sir Samuel Romilly) nor liiitearOerfriend (Sir Arthur Piggott) ;were in the habit of 'paying grist deference-4o uorjarbles, where corrupt in fl uence was employed; yet, iii this emit., there was no *pre. tense for saying it had or could have beery used ; the Proprietors were tinly guided by a clear view of their pecuniary interests. This majority had deprived the Sub-Committee of all nower, even sunposink it - had been duly (gingen and confirmed; Sod as I wollembers of the Sub-Committee had withdrawn and refused to act, it was obvious, under the 52d Coo. - 11 L, that they Were no Sub-Confnliittee Witt: if,' there-i fore, they. were - about to enter Into treWongsketients, and to ferm new coniracti, not-be 'tread- Foie, being unduly oppointid;:tV he removed from situation that might he attended'ilith St heavy . 'respon sibility. The 30th section kis s *if certain • roles, by which the first Sub: Commifteis• Was to bi chosen, and among them was the aPplohatiiin fi e f the general body cf Proprietors ; and the Oh-Section referred to the election of subsequent Sub.Civirimittees, and required that the same rules and regolstiobs shotild be observed. En this case they had not been observed, for the pre. seat Suh.Committee'had been only appointed by the Committee of 21, and never coofirmed at any Gene ral Meeting. • A short discussion here took place between all the Counsel on both sides as to the. words and meaning of the Acts; it was terminated by The Lotto CHANCELLOR, who observed that he should take care to iiad carefully the various clauses before he derided. [His Lordship here complitned that a breach of good faith hail been practised upon him, for when these Acts were before the House of Lords a pocitive• eogneemetit had been made that the affairs of Drury. lane Theatre should never be brought before him.] • Sir, S. Roams:lr went on to argue further, that as Mr. Walpole .and Laid Yarmouth had retired, -and had ceased to act on' 'he Suh•Corominee, the three missing could a, nothing; he did not contend that the concurrence of all five wasmeceasary, b u t under the Act he argued that all must vote Olson every question, that toe Proprietors might at least hove the benefit of. their attendance and opinions.—. The two months' previoui notice which they' were obliged to give, had, rerreoce to their ceasing to act, and they (.4,0,1 not cease to act . without it. and within .10 days the other Sub.bni-mittits.tnen were required, to till up the vacancy. Sir A. P. had been prodigi. ously angry thst the Select Committee had presumed to do. what Shay were *appointed for, vlz. to ex press an opinion whether the Theatre should con tissue open : they were not to be permitted to have an opinion or to express it ; a liberty enjoyed by th e v p r ie-T slave was not to be granted to them. an tyrannical this aristocracy, or oligarchy, or whatever it might he called, of Drury•lane, had become. The Plaintiff; lord recommended the ap pointment of a single individual, and this again ex cited the choler of his Learned Friend, who had for. gotten in his heat that his own Clients, the Sub-Corn. mitts..., had themselves offered to Mr. Colman ex actly what the Select Committee had proposed. It was undeniable that all Theatres that had been pro. 'wrong had been• under tltecontroul of one individual; Covent-garden had only one Manager, and it was ~- ---_— - PRICE OF St. •James's Market .. 4s. &t. Clare M3I ket 041. irket 3s. Bd. per et. 44 tit!). Average.... 4s. 61. COU !M . .; OF EXCHA Airerdam. 37 2 13 2 U. nna. at stab . 3 i s Atimierdain, II 8 C. F., Ditto. at sight, II 5 Rotterdam. 11 9 9 U. Antwerp, if 13 es ono: Haratturah. 34 6 2b•U. , 31.7 4y U. Pais, 3 days's sight, 24 25 IL Dino, 94 I+s 2 U. 11..urdeatix. 24 53 Flank on theMaine,l43ben.mo Madrid, 39 effective Cadiz, 39 effective Gilboa. 386 (Seville, 3Sb Gibraltar, 31 i a• voccessfol. Drury-lane had fisp. an_. This was, in troth, the great difference; that was asked was, as in the case of - other public work) that the Cotinnii be permitted to make contracts which fulfil, and which would only sooner It rain of the whole concern. As to evident that it was all expended: M, offer of a loan of a paltry thousand pros, the building, the scenery and the Mush more to he considered capital, in the of the word, than the counting.house, deli ledgers, were to be called the capita!' Some topics had been addressed to which were not expected ; such, f the dispersion of the performers, might be obliged to withdraw their t, rice ; but such a state of things, how, might be inevitable: he did not say thl he did not think it, hot they ought ti the loss, and some had accepted lOs. The effect of this Injunction would p r , the delay of the performances tilt Ch, beginning of the season the town wet and fuller houses would probably he delay. Under all the circumstances, his Lordship would see the necessity the injunction. Sir A • I'IcoOTT replied, principal the points urisiog out of the precise w, tutes. He persisted that the project Oh was so extravagant, that it almost horde, nit) , : it seemed as if it were the desig' Committtee to make the fortunes of the Covent-garden by shutting Drury-1, been whispered that Mr. Rot•itis was prietorof the former ; he did not say t, but at all events he was an auctioneek .be a very good job indeed for him if Old Drury to his hammer. Tli , Lonn Cirmsceta..)a said, the mould look into•the two Acts to.nigl opinion' to-morrow morning; if should know it on Mo. day. The fi, been the want of parties ; and recul culties that had arisen in the case of f from this defect, it w4s to he wishe s be included. There were certainly of bond.holdere deeply interested, notice to them ir would, perhaps, he 4inpe ibis Injunctios., it was fit also that if the Sub-Committee were not could not I•ii•fl the Ccrporation by if a performer were engaged by them, tro claim against 1L... Chi. poorly, , thous lite deci•ions, it seemed that he mil medy ogaititt the pseudo Sub-Commix other band, it had been properly cot 'part of the Corporation—al, act i ng it, ; and looking at the Acts it bad stt , as a question or d oubt and importance . Committee could be constituted escep in the manner specified. If, then, had neglecred the proper means and o f might not be ahle•to • supply the del , -case a question might arise, whether would not be gone altogether.. The Aitrich the Court had acted in cases of not to interfere, unless it appeared mischief would arise if it did not this swat illustrated by the application regarding roosts; the only case -referred to on either aide: whether this was brought within that principle his Lordship would not now determine. There it-, was yet another point deserving serious notice, and it was this—whether, let the power be lodged " .11 ;Ishete it Might, the Acts of Parliament bed not been.. e given under a pledge that the Theatre should be ilk opened and carried on by. the ways and memos the .Legislature had directed. By the patent, the P r o. ', 1 1! - •priptors claimed a- right to esclude all others frets " 1 " 'setting op a rival concern, mad they might he bound .!!" •it iftford the Public this species of amusement at all . 4* eventi. His Lordithip concluded by repeating the sentence with which he commenced. • Lord Ylrniotith, Mr: R. Wilson, Mr. Dooglat, end ortieti , were in Costs, which was math crowded during the whole of, the orpiment. UXBRIDGE. Carn-inspector's Return.—THURSDAY AVG. 11 Wheat, per Pand lBl. 15s. to 241. Batley, per quarter 443. —d. to 50.. —d. Oats Beam TO 111111 I die "TV I whitest Robots; I wilier, duel. Alettoo 'Tilton ' R bites, Re fichoge, a Veromelii To he and Cited. T"E agree& tp orders pry meteor IN seiroelte Moires repo a. I compose the epee Moo, on loose, of emobarsi NEVVGATE AND CE-ADENIIALL MARKETS, (b) the Carcass.) Reef .... Od. to its. Yd. Veal 4s. Od. in ss. 41 Mutton ... 4*. id. is 40. 11J. k 56. ()d. to 5,1. M totiob ...4-. Bd. to ss. Bd. TALLOW. Town Tallow 84s. Od. --s• Oi Yellow /tussles 79 Od. ed. White ditto. 765. od. Sq•ip ditto ..764. (Id. 04 • Melting btull 70s. 04. (IL Ditto rougb..4tis. Od. tit-ayes l6s. (fond Dress • Yellow Sams. 101s.—Mottled.1164.—Curd, 140..—Pettr, 1106 Piece of Caiiiiles, per dozeu. 255. 6d.—Moulds, 15-.od. *R e -; sr Cop eaa deatideds 0 bupe. 11011, of la ; 1 61 ridim 014E 1 1 te be 0 Te W. Prdethil' dem, at a diet rata Will be - NGE, FRIDAY, Auc. 14. Leghorn. Genoa. 47 Ma:tes, 50 *. Venter, 25 Naples, 431 Palermo. lt9 per opt. Lisbon 581 Oporto, blie Itio Janeiro, 68 Dublin. lob per Cent. Cork, 10i per Cent. Agio of the Runk on H cl Portugal Gold, in Coie l !tilit pel• oz. Gold, in Bars, 41. ls.6d. •New'Doßars, 51 50. Silter v in harsotundaril ,ss. f t. DIED. On Wednesday, the 12th ini•lituq, at I amileth. Mrs. Blend rel,ct of the late of Mr. Tbnenas !Shield. formerly of Surfer street, On the Thomas Latham, Esq. of Champion-hill , Camberwell. in the 75th year of his age. On Thursday last, Robert Benton, Esq. of Bart:shury - p laces I.lingeon, aged 86. On the bits instant, at Cheltenham, Arundel Roberts. El + aged 45. • On Monday, the 10th instant, in the 84th year of h isOree deeply regretted by his numerous friends and connexions. Leq. of DulwieM, Surrey •w I. beneficcuceeztenu to mane who now deeply lament their loss. On the 1 ltle initial, in his 66th year. Robert Carr Bracken ; bury. Esq. of Reidsby-luill, waiala Paul's C Bulbar', Pia. 93, Clarke). cash MEI Sew Bei ed at C 1.,. Ra New Ii beds see had Hap awe, se abil stye saliing K Medic la ibis I eases at as a diba AU kale MI nose ntr !MN : Printe4 and c,os r•, ••• N.: (1 EQ31.13 OF ter" No, 1,9 th sbury•cmtrr, F. A...4rt."' S . . .. . . • CP 4 lizo ka;ziitilt nd it wa g r`ll 1 ` e 7 -g erence ; awl al! If i coned or sq. hues' sho u ld not y.l) they could not • lead in th e ion n capitol, it ~,s Ir. M often 0., No. osed I fit- fart ; ~,,d lie to...k s ‘erpne i ndinary sills , of leaks, stol e ,. , nn i , • 4.7.F.......1.0 al rf a mereheut. . ... lo his Lordship fur instanrei 1 , some of eh% talents to Au& ... Vetter uriplee ennt, , hat it was so, t ot to bee r s pa r r 4 h. in the pound ; probably ohly 4 - ;ti, ist m ai ; it ill .. as always lim n ,::.' he mused !.) Iv " k a, he trusted tlut 6. a el ty of COntiOlllll 11111 111 1r1110p f f i "rows all I tally refer r i ng 1, * • loaf sadl n• ords n f th, s i. 1 . 1 seSo6o 0 future :91 on the (obe li * -• bee fhwi .- ii h e n i r a d h e o r ; d i: 16114 . 1% . 1 ,* 7 4gpra lwel o w to rove the Promeiond -4; ' . ratzEt lane, anti it tad • i a it extensive K u . that this own ' , , Wamtt • - . CASK(' wr,, and it would , • ulna e Ls . if he could brigs 4.1 . . Besides I hat if possible'', ' 4, fight, and state his . not, the patties .—..... 1 first objection had - TO 111 ullerting the dii. At the i F Aug. ! the Opers.hous lin k l e ; that all shank} ' THE al, sod greetel e l l:b l o b : ',: i t a ll i"ls.l : be unjust to cos. -'' highest rei io to he remark e d, The Re ',dictted : well elected, they . Anml a ities, y their acts; and prodded 1 mt, he could litre The AO per Cents, nigh t according to • • Ansl On sight hate his re. I. amities on lit! ee. If, on the : '.l Also 40 5 Shares II Jitstituted, It wire p : 10 y and a bindin g part al .. Deptford truck his Lordship ' dittos a* c'e whether a Sub. ''' Pe i. " ( 9 1 w (be !ept at ul. inverse • Aodit • . No, e n Hoe , the Corpervies O opportunity,thrf *t th deficiency : intits ' • A r the Corponata " .1w Too principle se 4 ,' of this kind, Wit I that immediate ' 11, t interpose; and V 1 .. l b, cation regarding • '• iminn t . 2 • W on either side : • ......