The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-03-14 00:00:00

Ai ME _ . . -,- , . . • f : 4 6 -- " _ 'I: . ... • ...-_:.- ' 7: %.,..*-'- - . - '."",.. -'1 . •,,,.-..: - '1" - . . - -`t - -7 , ,..: 7 w-. . • . • .t ' . . • 'L. '• . , • .• ..._ _, .., .: _ t7L-___ llis==.2kaammegzgoluaki:Fx=ohne: regarded this eisH am . as' etiertily groundles with 'that which had Imo tenthalte fooladation of tbe Suwon sips of litislialsttesCurplMAo2. Attachment to Bri. tish liberty, sod the Coustitetion, was too strongly implanted nett in the most busbies( the natives of this country, to soppohe that foreige allurements could havit aeg serious elect. Ewsselo the poorest, " 'gest tattle dyed to olitra his soul esefuren. • dear the bill that Isfen bins Male UMW." Be may 6n • liner climate and utentieellant plains: bet he has left at homesosatedear 'relative, souse bro ther, to whom his heart " Tares with cesselon polo. And drapes tack rename," Mimi lowing dohs." If, however, it was wished to drive people out of the country, so better On& amid be adopted than that which Ministers had resorted .to in the last Session of Parliament. TIP esnoliplisb such iss object, it would only be Necessary to tocimit the Sespansion of the Habeas Corpus Art, end to exposothem to all the mochinatioos of Spies and Inforniers. From the view he had taken of the stasit,of our force, he thought that a deduction of 13,000 'risk hemede.— shosid therefore move, that inste4 of the words " 113,000 awn," in the Bill, " 100,000" be substi tuted. Earl BATHURST maintained that the elnollat Of force was so antitheft was silrietly oecessary. • As to what was said by the Noble Earl; that only 60 odd Members of the House of Commons could tie found to Support the proposed astablisinnent, it war easily answered by the feet en the other side, that Mit of 668 Members, only 40 odd Members could to oppose it. With regard to the details of llielklibliment 9 the force in hilted was actually iliiisintsheil two thousand since tits last your, and the litinaining force it wee geoerally agreed mu sassily -necessary. -With respect to the colonies, the Noble 'Earl had argued shyest' increase of force was not no ' emery in Canada, because the United States had • only an army of eight thousand men, but be kept • set of sight that the United States bad a militia of • dal houdred thousand men, a part of which was re. !primly called out to service. The'Noble Berl also had not touched upon the colonies acquired since 1784, for which. force was necessarily required ; as to the old colonies, there was no increase of force since 1786. There remained in the Home Service, and when the Noble Fiat! tented as if the People were to be enslaved by the Army, was be aware of the 1111101111 i of force actually distributed on the home "ettlico--was he aware of the (area allotted to Guern sey sod Jersey ? The forte allotted•to Scotlaud was 2,300 men, and this very !err @anent of men was, according to rho Noble Lord's notions ' to enslave the whole Scottish People. Wee the Noble Earl aware of the force required for the Dock-yard ser eice....was be aware of the force 000eseary for the protection of the coast, to penult the intresion of a free trade ? With respect to the latter, it bad al ways hitherto been the system, that each man should only have one day's defy is four; bat now, owing to the diminished 'moan of force, the del required was one day in three, a fact which sufficiently showed that the number of troops had been reduced to the lowest possible amount, for a service ton, which was required from Suffolk to the Land's &ad, and from thence to Bristol. Deducting these different services, and the service of the metropolis and ten miles round, then ealy remained for all England end Wales 4,000 men, an amount whieb readers' per. testy ludicrous the 'opposition that they could en. slave the People. The force, therefore, altogether now required, was the lowest possible 'mesa that could be voted consistently with the actual wants of the country. Earl GROSVENOR said, that all be had beard only convinced him more and more of the injurious tendency of the measures of Government with re spect to the Army. The principles on which Mini sters acted were inceasistent with the Constitution of a free country. hi his calculation of the troops ne cessary for goading the dock-yards and the coast, the Noble Secretory of State had left eetirely out of view the Militia and the. Yeomanry Cavalry. There wise° occasion for a large Army to perform the set ' vices which bad been alluded tn, and its employment was only a proof of the inclination of certain persons to those principles of foreign despotism which at present so moo prevailed. There was a cereals de scription of persons in this country to whom a face tious story, told by an Italian author, would very well apply. According to that story, there was a rich and powerful island, in which the persons who formed the Ministers and Council of the Monarch wished to possess themselves, In his name, of all the power of the country. They Bettered the Monerch in those things to which Sovereigns are generally much inclir.ed. Splendid military establishments, and a m.)st brilliant Ceert, was maiehined. The cense qUPIICP, however, was, that a general discontent pre wailed through the mortify. An hottest courtier, who u ished to open the eyes of his Sovereign to the , danger of this state of things, assembled in a zoom in i the Palace a number of baboons, cats, andffirgs, dressed up in the fantastic drones which had Weasel the fashion of the day, some in the dress of 060 M, of the Guards, others had chains thrown round their necks. In one corner of the room sat' some et those 'nimbi., representing the Council, to which, aH the test were drawn, and connected by a chain. Having ' made- his arrangements, the courtier contrived to bring his Royal Master intliAlmkgpartment, so enraged at the ridicule cast on his favourites, that he threatened to plunge adaggerinte the breast of the courtier. The lattee l howeirer, begrd that his Ma. jeMp would dismiss theCoencil for /2 mouths, and thisedeice war - romplietterith. • The honest atom* retired, aid rotor* at the fold of the 12 menthi, when there was %thing bst s t &cleat and happiness In the country. Iletbentiekl t lit Ilis..Royal Master, " if • you are not sittis4edo.ollolgeleer dagger in my keen - now."—Witb thi s s:47 B :l4ebia imperfectly stated, es it Wei nnidisti pd below the bar, his Lord. , abip terminated histrephy... The Aurandmemt ecthen pet. aed negatived with otit a division ilfter r mbiels the t3ill was passed.. ' • The aletiny,,hhierake Bill, the Kiloteleletet Jail Bill, and somm lamer Hills, vets mad a-third time, aed imssitti.4lo4 nursed. • • _ .• ' HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. SW AN N bronzlrt in :vital far amending the Waterloo. btiilge Acts, which %%4. rend a tint time. A Petition Iva, prftentrd from Montrose against the Untie 11,11 out - - AI -- - " ~iri'iw~r~ ~..- "' 1 r -••,•• . •nr,rl.lr, THE STATES, ffait - Taz last • was resealed u.a w 11:' • ~.* t. M., 4111 tH . P • f ;#l l. t s *, [ilea • - ' ~-.' POOR LAWS. *. • . .Mr the Vestries iteellogi Bin. ins wise - flu. Id Bills for the stiorothnott of ihe Pu' ,Lows forma, to have she blanks filled they ..I.o.lll atod.—[tlearl] - l l..~ lid pro 'printed' ...e MM was read a second time. '''''' 46ll6 " . """ 3ll Mr. Alderman WOOD said. there were Isiolt . seijecti en .shish it would beadvisable some provisions should be made. As the law now stood, before persons were passed to their homes, the Minelarates, though they had esionnitted no act of vagrancy, wereohlig• d to commit diem for a week to Bride well, which, as 70, 80..qe even Ithi were sninetimes brought up in one day, perhaps natives of Ireland, was as eel' inconveni ent as expensive. He should be glad to see a clause introdtieed to enable the Magistrates to seed them directly to the Pan-tuast tr. There was also a penalty of 201.. upon the Pam-master who suf fered vagrants to escape. This Roe was to be recovered by ac tion; bet he thought it would be mach better to have a small fine which might be summarily levied, as the fact was, that probably half - the persons forwarded to their paristse, es c a p e d. Mr. STURGES BOURNE said,' that as to Irish and Scotch Vagrants a power we- given In the other Bill ta pass them without prefously conamiting them The Bill would be re committed after the holigys, aid the Worthy Alderman might then propose his clause. . . The Bill was committed. The . Poor Laws Aineadmeat Bill was also brought in, and iced a first and second time, mid committed ; bath the Bills were ordered to be recommitted on the Bth of April. Lord ALTHOIt PE brought in the Billfor the Repeal of the' Leather Tax, which was read a first time, and ordered to read a fecund time on the 6th of Apia. Mr. LUSHINGIC/N said the Chaticellor of the Exchequesq . b4 l who was taw absent, has no wish to oppose the iiitroduci ton of , the Bill. bat he should oppose it in every subsequent stage. ..- ' Sir F. IBURDET 1' presented a Petition from Hollierkh, praying for a Radical Reform. and Universal Suffrage, by hal- W.—Ordered to lie on the table, and to be printed. Mr. W. SA/ I PH presented a Petition from Lyon. in Nor folk, which I e stated *as mo t respectably signed. against the Bill of I..demnity. It was perfectly respectful towards the House, though it strongly I ondenined the Ministers. Mr. CALCKA rf moved far certain Papers respecting Salt Duties, for the information of the Lommittee. TITHES BILL. Mr. BROUGHAM said he hoped his Hon. Friend (Mr. Cur wee) would postpone the second reading of the Tithes Amend. meat Bill till Monday, as an Hon. and Learned Friend of his (Sir S. Rossilly) was absent, in the expectation that it wool() sot then be hrowtht on. Mr. CURWEN agreed to postpone it. Sir WM. SCO'IT hoped the Bill would not he enneeemarily p Cler ostponed, as there was a grew alarm ou the subject among the Mr. gy BROUGHAM said he was just in anxious a% the Hon. and Learned Gentleman that the Bill should he speedily brought on, and for the very purpose of gnieting that alarm. which.. ,when they came to the enactments, would be found to be with- Out foundation. The second reading nas fixed for Monday. ADJOURNMENT. In answer to a quemion from Lord A. 11 A MILTON. Lard CASTLERF.AGII mid that it was hi. iotention to one thebAstfisuraudeat of the house on Thursday BREWER' ES. The adjourned debate nn the Petition for a frets trade in Beer was resumed. • M. C. CA LVERI' said, he was prepared to a (i -deas circumstances to refute every charge which bad been made against the Bresere of the Metropolis. Pro. tided, however, it was proposed by any Gentleman to refer the suhje&t to a Committee, he should not op. pose that motion, ■nd lie should not then trouble the Wise, as the matter would be ezatiined in that Committee. The charges were not light, though without foundation, and if no Oentlemen moved fo'r a Committee, he hoped the House would allow him ti enter into the subject. Mr. LOCKHART said, he had no intention 14 move for a Committee. no had only performed his duty in presenting the • Native. He had no objet. lion to a Committee, if the Honourable Gentlemee (Mr. W. Smith) who had mentioned it, should move it. Mr. W. SMITH said, his advice had been this; that his Hon. Friends (Mears. Calvert and Barclay) should not refuse to agree to a Committee, if a Com mittee was demanded. But unless, on the part of the Petitioners, a Commitee was demanded, he did not thi►►k there was any case whatever to put his Hon. Friends on their defence, and, therefore, though it would not become them to oppose a Committee, he should not himself move for one. Nothing more was I wanting to clear them than a comparison of the evi. dehce which bad been adduced. The charges were two, first, Monopoly ; and, second, Adulteration. As to the charge of Monopoly. There were eleven I F Breweries which, it was said, agreed. as to the price of Porter, bet if they did not also agree es to the quality, there could be no monopoly, and it was not alleged that there was any sort of agreement as to that. The charge of adulteration was oriented. IThe laws plait it were so severe, that detection I would ensure the rein of the richest lodine : and bow meld it be practised with secrecy in a brewery from which 300,000 barrels were sent forth in a year ? How could the materials be carried in which could produce the slightest effect on so immense a quantity, without the fact being known to the whole neighbourhood, besides the persons connected with their concerns? This alone, even without the direct contradiction of teen of character, was sulkiest. Mr. P. MOORE said, that before entering into a Committee, it should be known what sort of respon sibility the Petitioners would be subject te it they did not prove their case, for if the statement bad been made in any other stay then by . Petition, he conceived they might be in danger of pillory. The *ember of the signatures were net to be regarded, hs they bad been convinced in the same nieutier as 'voters at en election. lie bad himself been applied to to sign, though he believed the allegations to be false. • Mr: - CALV FAT felt it soceisety to refute elms parts of a Petition so scandalous in its statements. The charges were of mooppely, of the use of dela- . lerioes *Metes, and of *drawee of the, price of beer ttnjettly.:•l It appeared to him that lift* of nothing need bwiskl en the chary of monopoly. H. might refer Members to the Report of the CoeOnittaLThey might, by examining the circumstances, sea that'the metioa was rldiceloes. Nothing was word safosed ed than what Mr. Beaumont had said eboet.thtes priclosstess and wantonness of the Prowlers respect. lag their prices. Ite UM,' good grounds existed for what they did,- as the Chancellor of the Exchequer had Informed them el his intentions Co increasethe duties. There was a great tweeelaidli lb, wee del on milt, *bleb was disuidvasiageimi fro the Brasier. The price . sae lowered wiled the 'war dodge ceased, which MIA the difeieeee of Ifs. It woold be too Wimps I. the neese if blobakto ge through items. bookletbatk abbe 011711i,sitwould be foetid that the peke of was 19s. &L rot bad boos. ; bat they bad whoa to to 410s.add, decd ii 14golaire. to cootredietion to what was asserted. be could sae, that for two years aftgr 17V9, the it: t er • !artead ffr'n W r. of ma I 01111 r- were losing past of ad I r 'nee in 1801 • , Wril j4ered wood Atha elterious articles p kraal ini In I hat lints ihtitAis hibit .11t011eti bylesaf.prpteedfug I tither ingredients than malt and boos were made use of. Some years back, Ohre or six) the F.ditor era *Witty Meer listen - der had libelled the London Porter-brewer., and stated they made use of "tobecco, deadly nightshade, and' flux optaica. The brewers wished to prosecute a Jebel of this natere. An affidavit was made by the proprietor of a large Brewers, denying therein*. men, and which was farther strengthened by the , affidavit of the person himself, who was the, ideal Brewer: The Covet was of opinion, therlithe ap plication for a rote for co knitted information was not sufficient as to questions of sale. The Brewers thought it was sufficient for en application to the Judges. No rule was granted ; but on the last day of the term, liberty was given to move in neat term. Before that nest term, the Editor M the Weekly Paper alluded to wrote a toistetential letter, in which he said he bad copied the article, and requested Iris (Mr. Calvert's) intercession to prevent prosecution. lie declined taking an, past in the business ; but the request o the Editor's latter wag complied with, after the'opinion of Sir William Garrow, and other Lawyers was taken a. to the effects of epplicition by affidavit. The Petition had-been hawked about the streets for signatutes. IN' earnestly hoped that t Committee would be iponinted to enquire fully into all the circumstances connected with this subject, in order that it might be seen haw little'credit was doe to the different statements of the Petition now be. fore them, and that Mr. Beaumont might be ex hibited in his proper colours, as si disappointed Ma. (tie rate, who had failed lit his itbject of exercising the Commission for his own priVate ends. Mr.- LOCKHART said, that he could not speak to the character of Mr. Barber Beaumont, as he had not the honoir of any acquaintance with that Gen tleman omit's' to his application to have the Peti tion under discussion presented to that floury.— When Mr. Beaumont applied to kite foe Me purpose, he felt it his duty to 'accede to the request, and he presented the Petition,' not as that of Mr. Beaumont only, but as the Petition of the 14,000 persons by whom it WAS signed. ' With regard to the observation, that the Petition contained libels upon respecteble establishments, the use of such language was, he must, say, calculated to interfere very materially with the right of petitiouing.;.. for if men were thus threatened when they attemlnetrtrecemplain of injustice or op. oresiion, many seotild shrink from even venturing to .petition, As to trio 'allegation, that it was grossly unjust to charge the Brener: with using any dale teriens ingredients, be was quite satisqted that no such ingredients were used in. the Breweriespi . either 41f the Gentlemen who had addressed- the floolse; as those Gentlemen bad 'lifted, borltii,w. could these Gen. tlemen pledge Alieniiiettes for all o'hur Brewers? — He was surprised at the intlictrinsionte objections to the character and . terms of Oil Petition; Wheri it was recollected that the complaint it preferred ogeinst-the system of licensing - was authorized by the Report of the Police Committee, which originated with some of the friends of the very Gentlemen who pressed those objections. ft was, indeed, distinctly alleged in that Report, that the licensing ilstem required revision, therefore if Mr. Barber 13eaurnont were the author of the Petition before the House his statement was %cosine& in this respect, by the authority of the Police Report. The charge seemed extraordinary that Mr. Beaumont in promoting this Petition was actuated by sinister motives. 11'hat those motives were be could not conseive. Ile would, however, concur with the wishes of the Hon. Gentleman who preferred the charge by moving, as ass amendment, that the•Petitiors he referred to a Coalmine., instead of the motion before the Hone that the Petition do' lie on the table. After some silence the Hon. Mem ber observed that he understood he could not rep.. lady move an amendment upon his own motion. Mr. BA RCLA Ysaid, that as the lion., Gentlemen felt the difficulty alluded to, he would move that the Petition be referred to . a Committee, of it wee his tensions Wish that the subject to which. It referied should be tboroeghly Investigated end-clearly en.' . . derstood. . ' ' Upon the suggestion of the Speaker as to the point of Ordee t Air. Lockhart withdrew the original snou non; andmeved that the Petition be referred to A Committee'. The modem was agreed to, and the Committlier was Videlinitecl,, tis 'csitssist .of 21 Mem bers, five of whotn'ara I h ....V a quorum. , CRUFLTY UNDER TUE SUsPIiNSION . NOT. Sir S. ROMILLY rose to pieiestre Pealed* from Robert Swindon, of Chester, wlsoiitilie.he haded verted to in the coven of. his observations upon ibe Indemnity Bill. The Petition .did, he;perceivat differ in some respects from the'stiletil'eni OM ap peared is the Chester Newspaper. but therstatestent substaittially concurred with the Petitioner lo Jill material points. This Petition was feeeterde4 tong lion. Friend of his, in order to be prentintedi•befoie he (Sir S. R.) alluded to the case in that 'Hosisefliet i his Hors. Friend (Mr. Bennett,) being prevented from attending the House by a domestic. calamity,, had sent it to hins,(Sir S.) to have it presented. • Hem now proposed to have the Petition brought np,:in. order to have it bald on the table. Whet• might be i come of this Petition hereafter he could unpretend' to say. Ile did not know that the 'offerings or the 1 poor Petitioner, with Abe loss of his wile and child, night net be made a topic of merriment. to minims ISOM. future debete.—[Hear heori hear! . on the Opposition benchesl . . The Petition was read, and ordered to lie on the table, as wis another Petition from Andrew Somer ville, of Glasgow, complaining of unjust arrest and stereos imprisomstent udder the Sespensioa. of the Habeas Corpse Act—adding, that after beingt Gil' months detained in prison the Petitioner ,iwestlitis, 'charged witout any trial: - ~, .s „. . stir. LYTTEI.MON presented Olyetition to 'm eta ersqoalified Conveyancerh ? ' 2 4)rderecr fii lie on the table. . Sir' GEORGE CLERK said, that on tr former *Melon the minsideration of some pliin for the eqoali lotion of Weights and bieasores had:been suspended, en the understanding that a 'Commission would be Issebd to certain Members of the Royal Society who ^ - _ _ _ • . OCkA) L>) ~t Um/ t enquire into the sebji as he understood, bed a could nogoorn thatA q i atromattis - ion, as t bibn issued; an 4 thing would be milli opportunity, after the recess, of bringing in a Bill wn the subject. _ •-•••ar"..,11W Mr. BRAGGE BAIBURST professed M e * nimble to give any information on theiajost ri b i t said be would make enquiry. ”Fro era 'peeling the transportation of convicts to New South - Wales; of the timber - 61 arm 4tio dlett ire passage; Of e thesesebet dischsiged for the l ast w ei r e y s e c a h re i f e r a o r m ; I s h u si sn lm o lts t , ho d s i e stiatth p in u g ni t o h l e m o p e su r ot a ii t si sid 't pired,, and of those who bad beers pardoned. The'Greeidaud Fishery Paths' Bill went theog i ii .'Committee. INDEMNITY BILL The ATTORNEY-GENERA(, then m ove d the Indemnity Bill should be read a third time. • Sir JOHN NEWPORT then rose end ststeitia amendment which he intendecito propose in the p re* amble o(the Bill. Ile thought that oohing route more fair than that the public purse should pariar the public protettion. The object of the prespetft was c l ear ly of a different tendency. By its prevl.s.. sions, any iiidividuaf who had been injured by th e steps which hid been adopted for the public safety, was prevented from seeking any redress, whatever she extent or aggravation of the injuries he had vos. t a i ne d. B a t nothing could be more dear sod deg monstrahle than fbe injustice of thus making a pd. vale individual pay the price at - which the pablia * safety bad been protected. The rui nous con quences of such a Bill struck him the more forcibly, as he had lived to see the scenes of cruelty and ~ atrocity which had been protected by former Acts of Indemnity in Ireland: As a proof of the injustice done to individuats . by Bills of Indemnity, he wink! mention a case that bad occurred in Ireland; ea the accuracy of his statement he was ready to stale ail I e hie-credit with thal House. A very respectabli corn.mvechant, of the name of Scott, was arrested by order of a person whose character repaired no epl. the, by Sir Thomas Jsidkin Fitzgerald, end on the information wf'Dcvaney, justly characterised as "a perjured and nefarious villain." The accusation was, that he had .been sending corn to Ross.— This accusation was palpably false, and capable of instant refutation-100,0001. were offered lit bail for him. This offer was refused: he was , dragged from his house and imprisoned. After duresse of sit days he was' offered Isis discharge on a bail of 20,0001. His ansoer was, " No, yon have blasted my character, end I will not be bailed: I wisest a -fair trial, in order to vindicate my Injure& reputation." At the end of ten days afterwards ha was enlarged without bail. In the mean time the price of corn had varied, and he had been prevented from availing himself of fair opportunities of dispel- log of eons in his hands. tie was thus rendered benkrupt . in - tortone, bud ruined in character, by a malkioors inlormation, and unjust imprisonment.— Ile brought en action for damages, but an Act of Indemnity robhed him of all redress. If then the country was protected by the measures of kit year, let the country, and not individuals, pay thrice. Ile felt a difficulty in alluding to proceedings in Ireland in presence of a Noble Lord, in whose time, sad during whose Ministry, they took place, although he siocerely acquitted' him of having knowingly been guilty of them. But the consequences of those pre- ceedings in Iceland ire foil of instruction, and ought to prove a warning to that House. By their con.. duct on that occasion thp Parliament of Ireland sealed its death-wag:ant. The People instantly fell from dui, and they wereobliged to surrender as soon as assailed, out a stieggle.' The Noble Lord never would with. have carried the Union, if the People had not been previously alienated. Some had believed, though' be did not charge, that it was the Noble Lord's intention to prodorn.thet effect by the Indemnity.-- The House should be aware of a similar consequence. If the People found not protection in that How, they would look for it elsewhere. The first amends ment he should move was, 46 That damages sustained by individuals be paid out of the public purse." The • sticond amendment he should move was, " That no. thing is the Act should easend to cases of undo* or eec&bsive rigour or severity in apprehending, kepis inning, or'detaissiog persons." It had been repeat edly aiserted, that the Bill did not eaten(' to thee rates: If Ministers were sincere io that declaration, ? they could, make no objection to an Uptick amend ment to the sameeffect. He wished also to know the meaning ettlieb.ed,tb the words " was advised:" In 1801, the/owes, two Acts of Indemnity, one for England, another for Ireland. The latter had those viords--Aeformer bad not. lie thought that cif. eurastance • so ominous as to require eaplanation• •If Miehterts should not object to those amendments, he world say nothing farther of them till the Bill was recd 'a third time; but if they did object, Ile would moie that tfie Bill be re.committed. Es leing•onderatontl.that Ministers did not wee, SirrJOHN NEWPORT moved that the BM be re committed. The SPEAKER felt some difficulty as to form. ?here was no precedent of a motive to have a recommitted on the question of the third reading. When a Bill originated in that lions', the form was, that' after it had passed through a Committee, it should be ordered to be engrossed ; when it came from the other Hense, the only difference Was, INA it came engrossed. As to any alterations propoied s it was as open to discuss them in the House sm -in . a Committee. But the only time for attaching Vora tions to a Bill that had once come to a third reading s was after it had been read a third time. Sir A J f o te n r e so N in c e w c eo " al r . " au l d il) Si ll r o W " s t r h .c e ra s i? ct H ie nak l a: t m w o ee u:s d ties t lsho inci t p h i o e o , ought t a h s e t t h , e a r s e the was ff stn e:oecgtiept to come before that House, t i: s l cu c s i s i e a d nd ito m t e. B. siege,r ß es A e T n i t iusi t , h e wh a s o u nd b ps je o lEC hi s A p *l ta is s ,l e: , cslling for their opinion by anticipation, Waisted Oat, although it was open to the other side to fey what they pleased now, Minisiers torte not Joisossper the time of discussing amenements, it was agreeerta po s tt i p r n i r t ie . i t i he El a t m a e N sid u m opposition last opp or t ea t o i t y thisto p m a ie s! n i, t t et w ilt. g i ial tib i j : s i t : i c e: o r: 6 r ilinristueitrilialdtils:r°elseincddirlihril:lBol;l • r - g .-. J I i i K 1- ,t • ■ t . , - - --,-- .2.a: • I+f. - .-- , elo. S~ 9 1 1 4