The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-10-12 00:00:00

liv the F.ir! of Dattst.rv.—Yon have stated, that tkert was no ms o.ery or concealment on occasion of liergann s .'weibilig under the tent, wasthere any mys ttry oe ronrca!rtient when von slept near her Royal Illghtress :—Nune whatever. Lord Duvounitssona.—Did von think it nothing ex traordinary that Bergami should be elevated in the wanner he was, did you think him entitled to it:--From te manner in which he was treated by the Marquis lteroglieri I did not think it extraordinary. Did it excite no suspicion in yOur mind?—None. bon have declined answering a question relative to Krs. Ifotruani's sleeping under a tent with her servant, wish to you what might be the age of Mrs. How caw ?—(Cet;eral expression of disapprobation.) lord I,AcULROALK—Can this be evidence The Lotto 4.'ftaxceccon—What the age of Mrs. 111Aretin rats hate to do with the Queen's case I cannot 1.0 :wilily determine. Lord Doy:oratimoast asked another question which re were astable directly to bear, owing to the andible disgeisliction of the Peers. The question, by the in terposition of the Lord Chancellor warn modyledinto the followieg: Doe you think that Lieutenant Flynn ought to be be lirvedouhis oath ?-11 think him a perfect man of honour. I don't wish you to answer the question I am about **pm to you. unless you choose ; you may do as you Flease 41)Unt it : but rwish to know, whether from your knowledge of Lief:tenant Flynn, you believe that his in/elle:Is are ?Awns clear? r,t•reral objections were made to the question ; and tbe Lard Chancellor decided that It could not be asked]. Lord Dc VUXsTANVILLS.—In the voyage from Jaffa, pa bare stated that Lieutenant Flynn slept on deck,.- La you not think that when lie slept there, her Royal Datums was sufficiently protected ?—1 think she was. Then I wish t o as k, if Lieutenant Flynn had slept on deck daring the whole fof the voyage from Jaffa to Sy ram's., would it have been necessary for any one to sleep under die tent!—There ni;ght . haye been mane fe34.l:s fur it—from the heavy rolling of the ship. acci dents Wight have happetiol, anch as the sea breaking over-loo3rd, which might render the presence of scout One neve•siry. , I "'u have halt!. that one evening you went tip tne lathier, and finding the Princess retired to rest, you ift.w do y-ou reconcile this with your opitiion " AllbereW " "'doff indecent in Dergand's passing the 1.11116 tlar tent withdrew by the side of the ladder Jew t!:ere were no other means of getting out, the feet heng dosell Oil all aides except that. What could hive occasioned the witness's going from t!...dinine-rooni up the ladder into the tent was in hal.it of suing lip on deck that way all day. 1 didn't 1.. JIV the tent tens closed. Lord Urtosvexon.—Do you know if from any dream- P rs 're•nntt. her Rtiyal Highness entertained any I :.prehensions for her personal safety?—She did, be taw she mentioned it to use. .lad did s!ie in consequence of inch apprehension. "Press a wish that she should be more closely attended the male part of her establishment ?—Yes. TheMarcnls of Dowries,' it C.---You have stated there 1'34 a quarrel between you and Baron Ompteda ; will Ms Mee the goodness to state what was the cause of t!.I quarrel was from the confession of a servant'. Lout LarmtaDaba objected to the question. • NO , tight it should he struck off the minntes. Loan l'itancat.Lost thought that if he had any f.cts to state, the quesdre ought to be put. ?be Marquis a Downentna.--Did any facts occur at lte Princess's resident's, that occasioned the quarrel Letweeu you and the Baron ?---lt was from the con fession of the servant; I saw a strratt on his looted tigtiq pardse for his crimes. Til E QUEEN. lIOIISE OF LORDS.—(Tots Aft e r the usual ceremony, the Peers were called o ver. The defaulters were, the Earls of Powis, Wel air", and Denbigh, and the Duke of Devonshire. c ogs sel were then called in; but before any further reet ediag. The Earl of BLESSINGTON rose, and expressed his . trr et that their Lordships had departed from their ruleof desiring the short-hard writer of the Muse ;repeat every question and answer. It had happened To himself and sevcral Nohle Lords, that detached ~o, ;es of evidence hid been lost from the circuni :once of the voice either of the Counsel, the witness, , r the examining Noble Lord dropping his voice to wards the conclution of a sentence. The Earl of 1..tl PERDALR objected to the repetition of the question and an:wer by the short-hand writer. 1 ,„ 1, 1 4 no wish that any witness should be improperly lwied; :Jut be thought the repetition destroyed all intent of a criss-examlnation. Furl tixtv fully agreed with the Noble Earl who 1 , 2 ,1fi r 0 spoken. lie could not agree with his Noble pl ai d on the cros.: bench. (the Earl of Lauderdale,) t:.at the repetition would destroy the intent of a crow nat.:illation; and he for one mast say, that unless 1 1., rm .:patios of the Noble Earl, who had first were adopted, he (Earl ti.) would not be able *ewe Isisissdi of the evidence. After a f. , w wig& from Lord Erskine, in favour of the Ea:l of litessingtovi, Vie mean ell.ttiCELLoll directed the short-hand writer to repeat every question and answer, and hr 'vested that Noble Lord would put a second .I , sti.ni until the answer to the tirst should have been r •”eated br the t4.ort4tand writer. (The PshEe ;Tints. and the Public in general. are much ilae-ted to the Noble Earl whd proposed the mode which Dow been acted anon ti) the Hover. Notts ithstanding t _lmo.' rare of the Headmen connected with the Press, i• cannot bat hsve happened that 30131 e inaccuracies have e-i.t into repsrti, but they can now be given with per t', .t corrcetne,v.l Lmtenant fIOWN.III was then called in. and his Ex amination by the Peers was resumed. Ev a PrtP.—lto you know when her Koval Highness t a bath vu board the polacre ?—No, l never knew 40 took a kith there. Gt- the Eirl of lit:lo4.rom.-11!ere . you in the service of et.e Prince“ before liergansi f —No, I was not. V!, you Lyon' the reason of Hergami beinsr selected t-i.:eep ander the tent for the protection of her Royal Vilsons. in preference to yourself?—No. h it customary fur a person who acts as a centinel to go asleep!!—\o, it is not. You han.staterl that you area Lieutenant in the Navy, e : bsard what ship did you serve ?—On board several st:ps. Re r nod punnet to name them, and the Captains?— re Afrirmi.i, - Captain Manby ; the Lively. Captain ILt !oath!! the Centaur. Sir Samuel Hood; the Bartleur, tnitain haricot!: the Resistance, Captain Adams, (and Ike wities named several others.) Ilk oiaLy years have yon been in the service ? kir..:e the Year P 41,3. THE STATESMAN. The Coriocatioa.—That is a fact, and he thee* the servant should be produced to prove that fact. The Mseovis of Dowirsotae.—What was the awe of that servant ?—Maurine Creery. Before whom did you see him kneel ?—Befere use Princess. Lord LACDERDALI could not positively understood how this evidence could be allowed to remain outlet& Lordships' books, because any thing he swore, he merely knew from the confession of a servant. lord GREY said that unless his ears deceived him,' nothing had been said that was not perfectly admissl- ble. He saw a servant on his knees, but never stated any thing that had occurred between him and the servant. He entered into no detail, he was therefore of opinion that no objection should be made to it. Lord LAUDERDALI persevered in his fornser opinion. • Lord HOLLAND objected, not only in this instance bet in every other, to have questions and answers struckei from the minutes. The objection, if made at all, should be made at the time. The Marquis of BUCKINGHAM could not see how this (parr,' between Ompteda and the witness had any con nection with the case before them. Lord (' . VW( said a few words in support of the question being put. The Marquis of Downsaiste then asked as follows: WAS it in consequence of any thing which this man said to her Royal Highness, that you called Ompteda out ?—This question was also objected to. Lords LAVDRIDALII and OHRE spoke upon its admis sibility. The LORD CHANCELLOR thought that the call* eat of Ouspteda by the witness, had nothing to do with this question. The question was again put and again objected to. The Lunn CHANCELLOR said that he Thought she question likely to do the witness an injury, and it he had not been understood before. he now said directly and plainly, that the question ought not to be put. The Noble Marquis eventually withdrew it. Did Majncci ever mention (iiiiptecla's name to yen? —I perfectly recollect at Home mentioning to Majoeci that if the is met Ouipteda they were not to mo lest him or to offer him any in.ult. I had never any conversation with the lower servants, and therefore Ma jocci could not have mentioned it to me. ' When Morris Crecy, went on his i:nees to her Royal Highness and asked forgiveness, what did she say in reply ?—She forgave him. Do you recollect the boar of the supper and evening pasties S--No. But you sun probably este, whether in your judg ment there was sufficient time between supper and din net for her Royal Highness to return home s I should there was. d a r r ahe, in point of fact, to your knowledge. ever re tort, on either of thaw days P—l do not I,tio*. 1 have no desire to conceal any thing. If I knew I would tell you. . Lord Drattistorow.,--Coa you state that her Royal Highness never took her clothes off during the whole period she was on board the polacre?--.She never took the clothes off except in the day-time, when she merely shifted her dress. You hare not positively said that Bergami was under the tent, but that your belief was, that he was there every night. wish to know whether sot know that if Serval was there, he must have reclined in the same manner on the other bed, with his clothes on ?—i never saw him, nor did I ever see any bed-clothes on that bed. Does Mrs. Hownam know, or is it only from report that the Princess never took her clothes off on her rrturn from Jaffa, when she retired to rest, and whether when she changed her dress it was in the tent or below ? Below in the cabin, I never saw her Royal Highness change her dress on deck. I apprehend you never saw her change her clothes ? No, I did not any where. Did von ever see that dance performed by Jiahomtt f —I did at the Villa d'Rste. I Was in the Princess's room and we heard a noise in the court-rani below, and went to the window, when we saw Mabouiet dancing before a crowd below. Did yea think there was any gent impropriety or in decency in that dance:—Certainly nut. Lord Eu.stsnonausu questioned the witness as to the lad time he saw Captain Briggs ; which he stated to be about a fortnight or a month since.—lie bad heard he was to be a witness against the Queen, and thinking it impossible he went (low is to Ports mouth to ask if that was the feet. Captain Briggs declined entering into any conversation on the subject, and only said I suspect I shall be called, I am afraid I shall ; hut my testimony will be nothing but what is ho nanrahle and just. He had never seen him sine., but on the day be gave his evidence in that House ; he only shook hands with him then on the stairs and said how do you do." Did you ever see the tent closed in the day-time Yes, I have closed it myself when I hare observed the Queen gosug to sleep, to protect her from the sun and weather, Lord LiVDERriaLt.--.llare Ton read the erideir, as published in the newspapers ?—I hare read sane of it. • . Did you read Majocei:s and DeoWV, Did you read Some ; some parts of It. What parts of his evidence did you select ?. Mr. Bitoutitraas here iutrefered.-.—lhe stated that he read a part of the celdenhe of Suechi, but Ise did not say that he had selected that part. ' The Marquis of Laysnow."l.--To be sore. 1 have read a psrt of a newspaper this morning., but I am snii it will not be said, that 1, therefore. seleretf that i,ort laugh.) Earl URET fully agreed with the Marcuis of Lae.. d.lwite, and the Earl of Lauderdale at leugsh con;ett; ed to abandon this lino of crus e -examinatiou, • • Are you a Knight of the order of St. Caroline NA -1 am. Have you a diploma hare. • Can you produce it ran. You said von arrivotl et Trieste at noon, and qulre4 it between five and eic ft. next thy ?--Yes. Does your statement. or. that subject, arise frw . your own recollecti , .a, or fr-rn the circamstance your referring to the letter yun ca yon wrote to vowr wife had already fixed upon twetity-four hones As being about the ti”,^ of our stay. I nosh to ascist your trr•mory a! to The time. Des you not recollect, at Trieste. her .`Majesty envleaTenr 7 tug to obtain a vivo of tw,ney ; I do not 'lei know whether her Majesty ever• cailtt4 upon her Hooker there. • • - • When ilt-rrami (lined in higenirier's•dresil with bps Row.; lligl (less. do you recoilect whether he canto into the ro.ni with licr He came in and At • told him to 'it down. Did he tit next to her on that occaCon 7-4 don't remeuiber that. Do you mean to say that you don't remember who ther hz sat next to her or not'?--1 do certainly. Did she _peek to him at dinner ?—,She spoke to hits 1 belier.:, lrit nothing in rule:Oar that I recollect. .• Di i you speak to him ?--.No, I think I did not. ►at I am not czrtain. has 'IA t:,e cousin of Bcrzami waited upon yqa at • table'--Ye 1. . ynu nit seen at the table of her Royal 111E1p. neis, the brother, the iiiter, the mother, and Ike cowlick of Berzami ?—The formtr I hare, but I don't mom. . ber the cousin. Lord FtLoot:Tn.—Ton have stated that you tow Lord Eidansonoron.—What was the supper hour? her Royal Highness walking arm in arm with Bee- —There was no fixed hour. It might be ab...ut eight gawi at the Villa d'Este, ware they then alone :---1 or nine. have seen them walk arm in arm in the garden. Am I to understand that you did not go into the, Was any one present at that time ?--'-1 never revel dining room after supper, unl.-ss going on deck ?----I feet seeing them at any particuhr time. bad no occasion to go there, unless going on deck. Are you positive that you saw them so walk when What was the latest hoer of going on deck?--1 can- 1 Bergami was Courier ?.---1 do not recollect having not say exactly. seen them so walk when Bergami was Courier. Did you ever enter the dining-room, after the tent Then yon are not positive that you have not seen was closed ?—I never went into the dining-room after them 5o walk when Bergami Was Courier . .--1 do not the tent was closed. recollect having so seen them. Then when you said yesterday, in answer to a clues. Lord HOOO.---Did the Baron Ompteda dine at the tion that was put, that yon saw no impropriety iii a fe- Princess's ta b le at Milan ?----1 think he did. male sleeping in the same tent, in consequence of the Did be at Como ?—He did. arrangemeots, you are stating facts on assumption. of which you had no knowledge. [Here some conver.atiou Did lie at the Villa Villani ?--He did. WORN and some previous questions were read layer. Did Moped wait at the Princess's tab . * it all those Have you any personal knowledge of the hatchway places ?----Ile did. and door being always open from the time you left the By the Duke of ATNoL.—You have said that you con- dining-room, until you returned ?-1 hare thorough con sidered it necessary that some one should sleep ail leo( It from seellyi it Open. when I went up. the tetrt, and that slat swre on - thou albs a male an - stein la the diming room on the Tome from ant, did you ever express your opinion of that necessity Java to Syracuse e —l do not know ; I hove seen a bed to Ilse Princess 7.--No. there chided down, bat I have never seen any ease 'Jeep You have said also, that there was no mystery or con. there. cealment when Bergami slept under the tent ; you have Where did Moped sleep?—Down in the hold. also told us, that on one occasion of your going op the Did Maoris* Garry continne in the service of her hatchway you found the tent closed ; did yea think Royal ffiginafas after the time you saw him en 1.15 knees? there was no mystery in that ?—When the tent was —He did, &II the journey to Vienna. closed, her Royal Highness had retired to rest. I cot- Now long ago is that ?—lt was in the heginninz of tainly thought - there was no mystery in it. November the circumstance occurred. In the March Was Bergami under the tent at that time ?--1 don't following he left the service of her Royal 11;gh ne.s. know. Why did he leave the service ?---He ma+ lent as ' Have you any reason to believe he was not ?---I have courier to the Margravioe, the aunt of the Princess. never thought upon it, and therefore have no Was the tent closed duirng the time by the order reason to believe upon it. of Count Schiavani ?-1 don't know. Yon have told us that you thought it necessary Was it completely closed during the day-time?-4 some one should bleep under the tent, and that person met ny. should be a male. Did you consider it necessary that Will you take upon yourself to say, that a rerson some one should sleep 6 ( .l °sr the tent ?—1 never " tee. ' who swore that it was so closed. would swear a false mended either one or the other. hood ?--I cannot answer for any one else. You have said that yon considered it necessary Lord Oath.---Did you ever see it so CIO!ell during some one should sleep near the Princess ; did you con- to b_ _lt lay. that any one passing, might see distinctly sider it necessary that that person should sleep within what mat within ?—No, I did not. the tent ?—I never thong:lit of it at all ; but I sup- The Marquis of WlLTsMilt.—itre you quite sure pose I thought it was neress•il y. that the hatches were beneath the tent:—'l omy know , Was it for the safety of her Royal Highness that ledge they were not beneath the tent. you conceived this necessity '— Her Royal Highness you mean that they were not beneath the tent, or thought so, and I never thought otherwise. th a t you had no knowledge of their being so . ..—i had Having told us of this necessity ; and that you no knowledge of their being so. Lord aloe.—Did yon write your own challenge never communicated your opinion to the Princess; am bathe Baron Onipetda t—l did. Ito conclude from that answer that her Royal High- Was it In your own composition ?—lt was. ness communicated her opinion of that necessity to Pu you understand French ?-4t was wr:;tcn in Eng ' you ? HA. (We understood the answer to this question to be in Did you make any copi es of it. did you give copies to • the a ffi rmative ; but on account of the noise below the gth7 lotto ?—I t°4 no co pies. Lord PIAWSOIOI.D.—Iv as tnere a companion to the bar we did not distinctly hear it.) belebes P—There was not. 1 You seemed to think this necessity arose out stow Then there was no protection to them ?—There was siderations of dancer relative to the Princoes; Whet mt , was the danger which you apprehended?---I don't Moodie test of the suite in the habit of using the know that there was any immediate danger. hatchway in the Jay time 7—They were. Then as you state that it was not in consequence of Lord finosvescon.— . If her Royal High rirt s lisd done any rant danger tiling so outrageously Indecent as to be seen hi' the ni,- ter and Mate of the kissing and embra. - ine Her- Me. lin ovc u s st.----I beg pardon of the Noble Duke ; vessel,Mil, Weald it not hare been matter of conrer% awn on but the witness has stated no such thing. He said 6 4 „,.3?—Th e pe w ° , iris generally o bi rite ,l ,„. there was no iinmediate danger ; but, with great sub- Lord °Roses:too thought, that as matter of belief aas mission, that is very different from his stating that received from the witness, as to Bergami --leeping in the there was nu danger at all. I am only anxious that led, he could pot see why he shonl.l not state his belief one question shall not assume a previous answer which 0 " this point also. Lord LITIR t said, that the witness night have a bas never been given. 11,4 occur satiety of reasons for his belief of a fact havi ng The Duke of Avnot.- 1 assure the Honourable so d Learned Orntleman, I intended that question shouldn't. 4 hit this was merely as to what conver . ation had woes the crew. brace the witnesses exact words ,— Tte i lioltle Lord then asked whether su 11 things Was there any danger 1- 1 have already said , th a t ec. i mire occurred without his knowing it :- there was no immediate danger. If I thooglit there the LORD CilitaeClLlOß thought the question was, I should not so easily have brought myself to sleep could sot he pat. below. Was there in Toor opinion sucient danger to induce Lord Sousa. —Yon have stated that you lived a ffi you to recommend that a male attendant should sloop bong While with the Princess, and that it was your Within the tent ?-1 have already said, I never recent I opittleti that the kindness shown by. her Royal High - • stis to.ilergutni's family, arose from propor motives. By Lind" ORANTHAX.—TOR said. that at Colwell hat little Now, wren child, the inother, the sister , the . Royal Highness dined occasionally with the Dregs! linetben S aid the other relatives of Bergami's werw Duke and oho ocecesionelly with the those: **Maros WM you dine with her Royal Highness oh r 111111.16"ta into th e family, re" rm. give any fia0 0 0; ealsp hit wife, as the fitted nurse of the Mid, Will!.] --I did. ! Tonight the supped also with dome Illsodoesildo, *introaseed ? lone, AM wilt then sisti with tier Ronal Iligibeediej44 . no Unto Clrowelisioti said, that it was To r ! . & dish -• 41 • „. ,111000 1 in *tate het., ana for their Lordships to At *bent w hat hour is hie diem 0 , ermaur..B 4 et An thine heti ; tbeirefore all this sort of cues that Court?---I do not know ositegq. it es we to =to t h o_ ,illtrojer . the evening, but I really moot give the b.* •, . K ,~~ .... ii:~N••r. ! ---•••••• 1 • • it;aa; Did sou ever see Rsrgasni's wife .at the table of bet Royal ilighletis?—l told you I ner..r saw het at all. iVerr ton ever at Villa a'Este or Villa Ikigami, with Bergansi. when her Royal Highness was not nitre?... Yrs. 1 think I was at the Blew% with hits when'the Princess was not there. Now Captain Hownam, rerollecting that rm. bara - fere these members of llergaint's family as bet halm' reeollecting that you have said you Wilma filergoll. slept tender the tent on hoard the polacre ; you mean to persist in 'treating that yon never ssiw any this= proper in the conduit of her Royal lirghmmas git coming her high station? •-: Captain Hownam, in a firm tone and most manner, answered as follows: • . I speak for myself. I don't know tbat I . dest•rstrtg to sit at her table than ileum*, I Intre teen often, very often, persadirdleits while their fathers were waiting behind tbat kb I do solemnly swear that 1 never saw any thing= per or unbecoming in her conduct, and de net It. .1 • \ • 1 • 4 [This answer excited a considerable selnatieb all stet the House] Y..ler:lay the Duke of York visited the ifsleettitii . • A• Palace in Pall-mall. ' • • Yesterday a ballot was held at thellast Ditto noose for the election of a Director, in the root of Sir A. Allan. Hart. deceased. At six o'clock the glasetisierip 7 . ... close.l, and delivered to the se:otiose/4, who reported .. 1 the electien to have fallen on Neil Bettjamta Zthattato stone, E.q. A requisition, signed by nearly SOO hotneboillers of the crevest respectability, has ken presented tai . v 4 9 Lord Amherst, the Churchwarden of St. chrorge's. • Hanover-.quire, :o convene a meeting of that populoel • • • parish, for the purpose of congratulating her Majenty • on the defeat of the congpirary against her. Lord •.; • Amhert ha• refustl; but a meeting is to be called • forthu ith. , • • 0 .r readers are apprized, that the trial of Mrs.. i. .... Carlile, for the publication of a libel. is . posted. .• The indictment was preferred at the instance of the. • .... 1 Society for the Suppression of Vice. 51,4. Carlile. we hear, required to know the names of her preessm- ••• tors, lest, peradventure, her Counsel might leaver. 1 te.tfly admit upon the Jury some of the very *emits • -.. • who were per zealous prosecutors. The members af. . - 7 .; . the Society for the Suppmsion of Vice, Iteseerer..', di.: ..., -,, pod by stealth, and blush to find it fame." Their„ .*.:. praise is not (fine* ; and they do 'not 'isllir tAiiie • ri!At Aged to knots what their left hod sfeetl•. Tao ..• eilb!: names of the members of the Society /Pt thireftm set. • 4:4 at present, forthcoming ) " and, so, Mrs. Caring) lit a 1 . ,.;.. .r: lowed to go her way for Hsi; time, aid at irtemrselliest . . 4 . . . .„,—• season they will call for her. a! iVir. reit-son, assisted by several public spirhed ger.. .....; time'', continues with nrivezdittisg assidsity•to Dearth ..' ': after Franklin, alias Fletcher, alias Forbes; 'f,r it ‘7" 1 ." seems this iiidustrions manufactoret of sedltioti *alit -. : . a. . treasonable placards has assumed' as many names et. ' . .. any delinquent we have for years lewd of at the 014-!- • ••.-.• Bailey. A number of houses were "inertia,. searehed•'.. -tt. , -. for him in the neighbourhood of illieeptiesel. }l4l-4 .f.t;' gate, Hendon, and Barnet, as he had hoed idle sW . . ,‘ the preceding day lurking in that directive.. ni t , , . s r . wife was found at her father's house ii Berndt. Of - • .', . which place the fugitive is a native' and thee. ii• V reason to believe that he had been there : Coco hii PO- - " •• . traordinary escape from Bow-street. Thilli4s ia s t n fut.!' •1.. - resided, we understand, in Qsebscitredi, * Cie. 'v. ~..., .. tape, 72. Edgeware•road, and lastly at CAmiodasup.i. • ~., place. Maida-vale. He is about Ilitei 7 bean bigtzt• im !. •• ': shout 45 years of are, of ruddy Oesepkel4l4 with. . •-- brown hair, hair, stout male, and rattier imposiarmaaneti. .43 • t . • He has two wens on the bead which a r threrailat.o 6 .mk • his hair. Me had on when be *WO 4 fit. r. a 7 7 buff waissesat. drab 'briteehtt sad 1011; g al . - Jorls':: 7 , - ...• the attitity of the patella In bliveige 10sPir. fillosirosilig, f• d m e i r fugitive will be speedily tails lain iia broaght to t r ial, in despite of any sabre that hoe beis mu* et that may yet be me* far hie pitiodimi. • _ _ . Pl • 4. - I. U;. . . : :,. ow • - - . i '! 13