The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-02-14 00:00:00

Wm' Igh 411.) suppose The First was divoree'd at the time be ascended t e throne, anti be hoped Ministers would, in the course of that night's debate, state how the fact was. If there was'any truth in the story of his having married the Undress of Kendal, it twist, otherwise, have been a left handed marriage, which there was reason to presume the lairs of Clermont would not recognise. The King and Privy Council, he contended, were bound to devote one' of the blank. left in the Liturgy, attached to the Aet of Uniformity, to the Queen-Consort. The King sod Privy Council bad not the psyver to omit names as they pleased, according to caprice, or prejudice, but were to change the names and fill tap the blanks as fitted to the occesions. It was a snbter (lige to say that the Queen was prayed for in the Prayer for the Royal Family. The whole of his ar ' gnment went to show that the Queen Consort must he prayed fur by name i and if the act itself did ant distinctly point that out, usage certainly did. The non-compliance of the present administration with this usage, was indicting a punishment which, to the people at large, appeared very much like vindictive feeling on their part. The people were convinced that this act was the suggestion of disappointed men. It proceeded from a contempt for the feelings and the interests of the country, for its morals and religion, and fast all judicial authority. They had now only to cssusider what compensation they could make for sufferings which they *ere bound to cousider were unjustly indicted. If the Ministers persisted in re fusing to restore the Queen's name to the Liturgy, it would be a pertinacity is error which conkd only in sure to themselves dishonour and defeat, as well as de- gradation to the dignity of the Crown. Let them ap proach the Throne with their herniate entreaties. The King bad no doubt been grossly deceived; and Iliad the omission never been made, her name certainly would nut be erased at the present moment. And if it would nut, he asked by what course of reasoning, by what rhetoric, or what chain of casuistry, could his Majesty's Ministers reconcile the continuance of the omission ? They had mingled political consider-' 'miens, and malignant passions with religion.; feelings. lie thought it ought to be no trifling consideration to tisk even a temporary secession front the national church ; and it was something to risk the continuance of the present discontents. The whole country were looking to the vote of that night as to their only tope of retaining their grasp on the laws and the constitution. In voting fur the motion of his Hun. Friend, he conceived be was discharging a sacred duty which he owed to the Public, to the Crown, and to that House. Mr. LEUUE adslressesi the House in a low tone of', voice. He confessed that he had always regarded the omission of the Queen's name from the Liturgy as ill liftvised and inexpedient, although be' did not dont* that his Majesty's Ministers had advised that act from a sense of duty. At the same time he thought the ori ginal insertion of her Majesty's swim had been much over-rated. It would not, in his opinion, have been a mark o f peculiar grace and favor, ae it could only he con sidered to be in compliance with the general custom: and the effect of the omission was not such as to dispose the mind,' of the people of the country, adverse to her Ilajesty. thi the contrary, she had gained a great many partisans by it. From the impression on his mind, after all he had heard in that Muse ou the subject, he slid not consider the omission as illegal. No Hoes. Mem ber would say that her Majesty had not been prayed for by all the loyal, when included in the prayer for the whole Royal Family. With respect to the late pro ceedings against her Majesty in the House of Lords, hr could not bring his mint to conceive that any Ministers of the Crown, in the nineteenth century, could so tar re trogade towards the dark ages, as to advocate such a case against the Queen, with the support ut hired svittiesbee. The grounds of his opposition to the present motion, were the Queen s letter to the King, and her answers to whir (Hear, bear, hear '.)-lle cared not whether she ex sited the people of the rituality under the denomination of " her subjects," or not ; it was on the broad general tenor of her answers that he grounded his objection. It had been said, allowances ought to be made for the Queen's feelings • he was willing to admit that , hot he could.put grant ;hat this allowance could be extended to a aerie% of pultlicalons tending to inspire hostility to every institution which was dear to the natives of this country.—(llrar, hear.) —He could not agree that this allowance should extended to a letter which reviled the Sovereign, and strove to set the people in array against Purliament.—(Hear, hear.)—lle could assure the Hon. Member who brou ! sht forward this lion, that it the Queen . ; 11Allit had been originally inserted in thee Liturgy, those publications would be sufficient, in his opinioe, to warrant it• erasure.—(Near, hear.)—Untler these circumstances, he asserted that the restoration of her Majesty's name would be repugnant to the wishes of the great majority of the nation ; and carrying up an Address to the Crown, founded on this resolution, would be an unauthorisable interference with the Royal pre rogative, derogatory to the dignity of the Crown, and injurious to the best interests of the country.—(clear.) Mr. C. W. WYNNE regretted that he had not, at an earlier period of the Session, been able to catch the Sptsker s eye. Ile had, however, been gratitied by besting the excellent speech of the lion Nlenther for Oxford (Mr. Peel) on a former night, which entirely coincided with his own sentiments. Althouele he thought his Majesty's Ministers to blame in much, yet lie did not think it amounted to their deserving to he denounced by Parliamentary censure. He regretted the conduct pursued toe Ards the Qteen in some instances—he re- 1 gretted that no notification had hero given to her of tine death of the late King, and still more did he regret that no communication bad been made to her on the OCC3• sion of her daughter's death. This was that which, in his opiuiun, could have occurred in no private family. whatever the conduct of the mother might have been. He, however, while he stated this, could not see that the Act of Uniformity respired that the name of the Queen should be inserted in the Liturgy as a matter of right. Ile had looked into the Act, amid found no mention of the Queen iu it but in that disuse which gave they' King the power of changing the names from tinie to time. He then referred to several cases, to thew that its insertion was not called for from immemorial ens ttim, or from the strenni of precedent. It nee optics' al, frith the Sover e i g n t o c h a n ge th e n a mes at his pleasur.. was sees hunt the introduction of the Elector Va lentine on oneucrasion, and sithsequently of that of the retress Sn• phis. The Electress war not of the Royal Family of F.iigland ; she eras only second cousin to. A Queen Ann, feu the Queen caused tier to la. prayed for, Honourable Member might not be intended to do this, stiff in effect it would recommend her Majesty, if carried, as an object of grace and favour. After all.that was stud of the acquittal of her Majesty, and of her right to be considered not guilty, before they recommended her to anv mark of grace and favour, they must take. into their consideration what. her Majeatv's character was, and this must be expected to influence their Pproceedings. He called upon them to look at what ad been ilone in the case •f the Duke of Cumber- land.. it was most unjust for the House to give hiss less than they gave to the other members of the Royal Fa mily, if character seas to stand fur nothing. It was true, that the late Queen disapproved of his marriage, but this proved nothing against him, yet the House, act ing on the unfavourable impression created against that individual, had refused to put hint in the same situation in which the other members of the Royal Family had been placed. In his opinion enough had been proved against the Queen to make her unlit to be pointed emirs a mask of race and favour. This a-as pressed still more strongly on his mind by the public acts to whirls her Majesty, through the influence of had advisers, hail lent herself since her last arrival in England, and by the an swers which she hail riven to the Addresses carded up to her, in which she hail been made to revile and to en deavour to throw discredit on all the institutions of the country. To him it appeared that what had been done with respect to the Liturgy was perfectly legal, and he was not disposed now to call upon the Crown to al ter it. Mr. WILBERFORCE had hoped that, by some ar rangement, and by means of mutual concession, the question that was now brought before the House might he avoided. Unhappily this was not the case, and it had become necessary for them to pause and to form a . deliberate opinion upon the important wide itsader con sideration. He bad failed in meeting with an oppor tunity, a few nights since, of stating his views respect. ing it, and must now begin with a full acquittal of his Majesty's Ministers, and by expressing his entire cos turrence with an lion. andlearneil Gentleman, that no blame could fairly he said to attach to them. Differing, as he did, in many points, bodi wills his Majesty's Mi nisters and with several Hon. Gentlemen, for whom be entertained great respect, on the course of these pro• ceeulints, he thought it a debt of justice to say that ali ii iai r es had been placed in a mos: difficult and trying situation. In the conduct Odds they had to purses., they were presented a choler of evils; and if they erred, the error was one of judgment, anti did not, to his mind, indicate any want of capacity, much less any want of integrity. He had now, however, 6ibuirthiug different in contemplation : he wished to take a prac tical view of the subject as the best le by which they could note arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. Intenii leg to treat the question in this manner, lie innst, in the first instance, examine the objections which had been raised, on both *Wes, to the course of proceeding, to which each was respectively opposed. If the only doubt existing on the subject was that which involved the legelity of omitting her Majesty's name, he should not deem it of very high importance, and, after all he had beard, should be disposed to leave the question where lII' 114111 fiinlid it, in what had been called '• the elorions uncertainty of the lair." Let it not, however, he imagined, that he had not heard with pleasure and ad o& did!' the speech of an Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Wetherell) on a former night. For a time the reasoning of that speech produced a great etlect upon Isis mind ; but when lie calm. to reflect further upon it, his doubts returned, awl whether the original omission was legal or illegal, the question was now to he regarded under aoother aspect. Ile felt deeply the force of those cum• sislerations which haul beets pressed on the attention of the house by his Ilou. and Learned Friend (we believe Mr. 11. Legge), and could not hut think t:iat her Majesty in adopting sentiments so unlike the tone and language which she had used in replying to the Address ut OA lions', haul shown none of the respect clue to the Con stitution of Parliament and to the established lan s of the country. Whatever excuse lie might be ready to make, still it must be admitted that the reiteration of such sen timents went to violate theyonstitution, and were as in jurious to the public as they were dislimionrable to her sett—(Heat, hear, from the Ministerial lienclies.)—At the same time it ought not to be considered that the fault was so much that of the Queen as her advisers, anti he had felt souse surprise that those who haul primed the Queen's Icier, or perhaps some other documents, bad not incurred the animadversion of the law. When he supported the motion, he supported it, therefore, fur the sake of the country, and fur no other reason.—(l'ries of " Ilear, hear, hear.”)—He looked to the elicit which was to be prcdseced on the bulk of the middle and lower el . , who were at present left open to the assaults and seductions of mischievous men, who lost no opportu nity of creating public confusion. The question generally asked was, why should not things be restored to their former situations That they were not so restored was at ributed to some evil design, and this belief was care fully inculcated. Ile was aware that public men some times thought it necessary to make a stand upon particu lar questions, and rashly declared amongst themselves a determination to that effect , but he never had known a subject on which it was less their interest or their duty to enter into such an engagement. If concession were to lead to many subsequent titeasnres, if it were gernii must and was necessarily to produce many branches, if it was the beginning of a course that might lead to an uncertain issue, lie should clearly understand the force of their objections. On the contrary. however, the act required was simple, and led to no further conse quences; it promised also to put an end to discussion', in which lie hail found sonic of the best and ablest men at variance. He Must here persist, although it might appear singular, or again expose hint to derisioa, in the opinion which lie ha d formerly expressed as to her Ma jesty being already prayed for um{ o. the general title of "ail the royal family. • As this might be retarded as a quibble by sons,. persons, lie should not further advert to it; and returning to the general impression, lie thought it impossib:c that any Honorable Member could have failed to observe that a very common remark anetngst the the people was, " if the Queen is bad, there is the more reasoa to pray for her." This might serve to illustrate what was undoubtedly true, that the goodness or badness of individual character ought not to influience the admission or exclusion of names from the Littirgy.—(Criesof hear, hear.) If questions of this kind were always to be tried by that test, the in.: convenience and uncertainty would soon become obvi. - , ons. Should it he necessary to mark the sense enter taiturd of any impropriety or misconduct, it might he stone in some other way, as, for example, by a di:flints him: of allowance. The people now found - that her Mie. jest- was restored to all the preroguttiveioNueeis, and. could not feel satisfied that she ought at the same time . to he excluded from their prayers. This excinaion was a most unhappyeirrainetince iu another reaper % Patina,. ae lie did, that it bad bceu the ne. ens of introducing sion , net amongst freque... churches.—(Hear.) The latter did not always regard every set of the crown as the act of its advisers, although this was the constitutional principle, and although he himself felt satisfied that if his Majesty did know the general sentiment, or the satisfaction which might be communicated to the great body of his subjects by the measure, lie would wish for its immediate adop tion.—(Rear, hear.) Of all the considerations, there fore, which influenced the opinion that he had formed that of the effect produced by the exclusion of her Majesty's name on the popular mind was the most operative. The omission was brought under public notice every Sunday, and the wound which might otherwise be healed was kept in a •state of continued irritation. Such an effect could not but be prejudicial to our ekerch establishment at a time when there were but * many causes at wort for its overthrow--it a time when so many mischievous men were industrionity employing every means for the destruction both of ear religious and civil constitution. He bad been informed that the Queen whilst excluded from the prayers of the established Church, was prayed for in most of the Me thodist Chapels. Nothing, in short, seemed so well calculated as the present state of things for bringing iris disrespect and contempt an ecclesiastical system, sealed with the blood of martyrs, and from which the dissenters themselves had derived all the advantages which they enjoyed. lie would, therefore, guard anti cherish, with redoubled earnestness, what was PO sacred in itself, and was now threatened by so many dangers. Thoaesta tigers were rendered formuidahle,botis by the pees sure of the times and the unceasing efforts made by the ma firious to estrange the present generation from the re ligion of their forefathers. True justice, true dignity, and trite magnanimity, did not, in his opinion, consist in resolutely adhering to a measure, hecaose it hail been mire adopted. It' its abandonment was likely to confer a substantial benefit on the coun try. it became a magnanimous as well an honest man to sacrifice his own opinion to the gene ral interest. Let nut the house conceive, let not any llonourablellember conceive, that to yield to the pre seat motion was to declare a belief of the impotence of the *seen. With hint (Mr. Wilberforce) the innocence or guilt of her Majesty weighed not a feather. Inde pendently of any feeling upon that point, he would vote for the motion, because he thought that its success would go to tranquillise the country ; if it would not at once restore peace and harmony to the kingdom, it world at least remove onecauseddiscontent—one cause I perhaps of many, but certainly a cause of very consider able weight. 'Perhaps the feelinut upon which he had acted during so many years, a feeling the advantage of which he had never yet found cause to doubt ; perhaps that feeling might impress his mind more powerfully than it would effect the minds of those whom he was ad• dressing; hut lie would vote for the motion of his Hen. relation, if it were only that the motion was framed in a pacific spirit, that it tended to heal the wounds under minds aboomesertry woe safFeriog.—(Hear, hear, hear.) — Never, perhaps, hail the house been in more dan ger of opposing itself to public opinion than in the pres.ost case ;—never, perhaps, could the countey with more advantage advert to the principle adopted by Mr. Pitt, when, fooling the public feeling strung against his own, he gave up his own opinion to time opinions of time j people of England. That principle which led Mr. Pitt to seek a peace with France at time moment when he him self was disposed to a continuance of the war ; that was a principle of conduct which proved him worthy to be the minister of a free country ;—a principle which, by attaching the alfertions of the people to the government, prevented the well-meaning from being misled, and from becoming time dupes of time ill-disposed. If, when the various temporary causes of discontent should have passed away, if then the wound which he (Mr. Wilber force) How sought to heal were left to fester and inflator, ill consespiences, be feared, would be time result of such neglect. When lie reflected that a Sunday could not pass without recalling the suhjert to the public mind, he much feared that they would have to regret that they had not removed the cause of so much dissatisfaction and discontent. It was not with any reference to her Majesty's dignity or honour that he reeminnenuled the motion of his lion. Relation; be slid it in deference to the conacieatious and religious feelings of a great portion of the people, and, shove all, front a fell sense of what was dee to the well-being of the country, whose feelings ought to be pacified—(continued cheers fur some minutes.) Mr. sruA KT WORTLEY was compelled, al though with regret, to differ from time hon. member who had last spoken. Granting that he could not agree with the people in their opinion, that bun. member was still prepared to ground his vote upon his deference to their wishes, and he called upon the house to follow his example. Time view which he (Mr. S. Wortiv) took of his duty in parliament was this ;—he was to give all due weight to the represen tatious of his constituents, to listen to their prayers. (bear.heor,) and to the arvinents be which shey en forced them, and then to vote accoraing to his own opinion —(heer, hear, and laughter.) epou that principle it was that his vote on time present occasion would be founded ; and he would explain to the Noose why lie could not, after what had happened, advise, the Crown to bestow any mark of grace or favour ] upon the Queen, True, the sense of a great body of the people had clearly declared itself in hsvaur of the effect of the present motion ; but lie (Mr. S. Wort• lee) thought that time people had coinus to that opinion under an erroneous impression. The people thought that or exelnde the name of the Queen from the Liturgy was to deprive her of a right ; and if once he (the hun. member) could be of that opinion,', he would undoubtedly vote for the iusertion of her ] name; but he voted against the present motion because ant even all the eloquent speeches he bad heard had convinced hint that in the exclusion there was any ] thing illegal. lie did not put the ner.ative vote which he proposes, to give upon the ground taken by the Hon. Member (Mr. Legge) who haul spoken for the first time.: npon time present occasion ; lie deprecated the language: put forth in her Majesty's Addresses, and in her letter tom the king; but Parliament might in another way to mark l its disapprobation of that language; he (Mr. Stuattl Wortley) would' not on that account exelode bee Ma-i jest's name from the l.itncgy. But the Queen, most 111-1 whose-illy, had rejected the mediation of the houirie ; shel haul refused to take any steps by which the differences between the illustrious parties could be arraltod Ae heal pat herself npen her trial: and, in soputtingisenietir she took the fist of any impression which might be ip_ro dared by eirconistences coining out doriag that Now there were some fact' of AAA . 4.1 was itapelleibliPigi , divest tne mind ; and although he (air. S. Wortley) . long isl 'he t et* (ChArs,)--: ore _ Rouse with a words as to his . . consluct in her Majesty's cue It was well known to those *ha were in Parliatuent In 1812 that he had at that time ex pressed himself most strongly upon the subject of the differences of the Royal Family ; and be bad then said what he stilt thought, that, at that period, the Queen was most unstilal treated.--(Hear,ltear.)—The opi nion which be bad then expressed be still mainttantl : and he did believe that a great deal of the feeling now fluting in favour of the Queen might beiraced back to the indignation excited by , 0-- course of conduct tut . _ part, the . 181% pursued against her. - He WT led. to hary all that bad passed in "ohlivibn—(lamgitter) he thought that it might be done, provided, the House Ina not called un to vote upon motions like the present but if he was driven to say whether he would call upon the Crown to hold up the Queen to the respect of . country, be mast say that there had been such circit - n • stances pyoved against her najtisty as laittliced him, most decidedly, to negative the measure. Mr. MARTIN (of tialway) rose, amid coughing an I. cries of " question ;" and fur some time we were unable to each the drift of his argument. When we could col lect the hon. member's words, we found him expensing his surprise that the honourable member far Ili-anther should he supporting a motion in the very teeth of Opt with which lie had himself come forward on a former occasion. The truth was, there must be a giving way ; and if the Queen, who was in the wrong, would not give way, then, thought the honourable member for firatnlart, the crown, which is in the right, must—that's all. - (Hear, and langliter.)—The honourable member's pri ti elide (eontiuued Mr. Martin) puts me in mind u( &little matter which happened in my conntry.--(Langhter.) A friend of mine committed a great outrage upon some body one night, anti next morning he asked toe--" s n a s will Ido said lie, " You are the wrong doer; tu.l,•tis he sure, you'll make an apology," said I. But he woold not make any concession at all. Well—tbe friend of the Injured party, as a man of honour should ilo, waited en me: " lour friend ii inejae wrong, and he'll apologise." says be. " Faith yon may ?mike a riddle of his holy, but devil of any apology you'll get from him," said I. " But what's to he done ?" said he. `• That's what I don't know," said I. " Matters have gone so far we'll never get out without an apology sotneway." " I tell you again--says I—apology my friend will make none." 01e, then,. faith I have it —said be—if your friend wont' apologise, to be sure mine shall, and that trill Ito just the saute thing yon know."- -(Cheers and laughter.) Mr. Martin eoncluiled by dissenting front the motion. Mr. LENNARD said lie was very glad that it Is a 1 been at last admitted by gentlemen opposite that the ex elusion of her Majesty's name from the Liturgy was 1 punishment: he had always considered it so : and tie thought it unworthy of the Noble Lord opposite to con tend, as be had done on former occasions, that it W4i not punishment. Ile had heard with great surprise member fur Montgomeryshire, and the member f Yorkshire, contend that the restoration of the Qtmets• 4 mama to dm Literary was me net of wean sod fermi -. lie would not attempt, after the luminous argtouteet on a former night of the lion. member fur Oxford, to ;roe the trestion on the strict construction of the Act of Parliament ,• but it seemed to him that no man who honestly and sincerely applied himself to this spiestioo, with the assistance of those arguments,could have a dout,t that the rejection of her Majesty'r name from the I. - turgy was an arbitrary and illegal assumption, in 0:e teeth of the true meaning of the Act of Parliament. N • man, in his opinion, cou ld read that statute wit`to being convinced that it was never meant that th..re should he any discretion to alter or change beyond via: alteration which might become necessary by death, or other inevitable accident. But the truth was, there was no law to reach the Queen : and therefore new larva were to be made and old ours broken. She Was tit be Finished and then heard, castigatque atalityse. She was to !or punished with more than Rhailamanthean injustice ; for, . after being punished and beard, and tried and acquitted • —the prerogative of the crown—that prerogative-con tended for by ministers, butt denied by the people--no thiprerogativeof mercy,which was admitted,huttlie•kre rogative of vengeance, which was denied—was set'np %apply what was deficient in the rigour of the law. Itliad been said, that as the Queen's name had been already ea eluded from the Liturgy, it would be inexpedient to eft it in agai n.W hat was this argument.but an admission that accusation, coining front the quarter from whence it cam was to be taken as proof of guilt? He was tint surprised it this from gentlemen who had approved o f the exclusion rif the Queen s name from the Liturgy before her trial. This act served to mark the spirit of the proceetline against her—those proceeding% anomalous in the antaii of our history, of the worst times of our history ; served also to quark the iiretlit which was due to any sentiments its favour of jostlee professed by his Alaji-s -tv*s ministers. No one coulrhare forgotten how:at:et the Manchester Massacre, they deprecated any expreta lion of opinion which might prejudice that litteetion‘ vet tbe•,• P aul not been unwillitrg to brand the Queen a' guilty larfore her trtal—'her anouralons trial, when her judges were her accueers, and her licensers the paid set• vents of her husband the complainant, and the supposed injured party. But above all she had a greater nsisfort tune than having her judges for her accusers: they weie her former friends: and it *as the commonest observa tion, that none so persecuted •thell• former religion all those who had abandoned it. " Itenegadoes "never change by halves." All her former friends, to whonashe should have looked for support, had deserted her in het` minim need, and witn one exception (land lie doubt... 4 even the truth •of that exception), had ranged then?. selves against her. It was trite that the Member fcr Liverpool was not them that night to urge the rants of government against the Queen ; it was true that l`f had culled bee the grace and ornament of soelety . ; bat was it nut also true that he had coinciilek in the early measurri s agains` her; at all events he had thought her unworthy of his support; avid left her t o hi. defended as she itairegt t but she had foniid in the people . of England—in public that inherent ftelitrq , of jostle, which is ilsysay s s to•befotind hi' the breasts At an enlightened and • free pearpte-;Lthat pity - anti • support *back bad been - denied to her by the Members ot•lnii linshantre family. He coblit Me the intisann *by iao conviction was so be Wiriest into the- issiode of his Ma: ittltVe Willi titer% :. essekio sane refeersent was her: s. imotto. They ci riot Agri •to he ailfeere . --t4 eonfes• • *it their Milan Co ainivition bad h e leoldeeeliod:os• aho s it had tie.eiveskilte'ts. Art the the bid done was to lfe *tierensled anti supported:l hitt he tfill-uotleellie opecrig the Azit whim jttlitite. tieleyed,• aeilidd 'length be done: • A•kw Ithn,•in a speech as ro‘arleable . itt conducing' find oti tined•hisentresctiom with anti: two . other Mientbirk; Mime *islet he trephOirdin aVfontierettlelvitl at-the the state et public t'teli • - s • A be ._ ..... , • . • 4 i . .... ~ a . , ora...- l- --ar : • .. 1... - 1- ... • ~..,,, .. -.-..4160•60. , .......P0 , : -. to ...- .. . - . • ..--....0. . ...-.--- -..--- ... - --...---- ...--....- .m.. ihat.this Act was ip agitation, and I shis was advally,pre• .**d Sio Ititi.4wit fi t !Wild 01411011 0 111aill *Ph; loth Inkiest foefluX into t 41116.-,-fflittl% ... r • :" , . - • • , • lent at the bar of the !lons. of Gorda es May •19, ililt, Konoesimielfsfsly's*d SA, SkaajaCto . btii,litilesty gls titan Mu) hefoiaireea hi haislfot , ' $L '' " % , 1 _ i cZi , , . r ,1.. a• . fb. r AZ . . Fie u le hear the Royal assent given toil. Two months after for wiest'she &id cone. "Ms cosestltrgiao4 Ibe the ON fte.,:esteciloa, 64, ire wakp . , ftet. pa 014 r a the King was married to Catherine, sodtbie wia enmigh Noose was this, whether the Aa ienplalied it in t ). in. wee urbon b e might fo aktilargir:iri i • - ' '' 4 . ' • l i t t ;el e.4 fr: .‘ . • 111041 4 1/ " . .' • 11 .. fo spew that this was contemplated by the Legislatere posing it to be legal, was of such a character as to call 4 44 wheithe might dig* sa . from histatisalkeani• to i • fis di s a 4: 1 . - at t thud mg a iii framinx the clause relating to the Royal Fimlly said upon them; the great Council of the nation, to regain. sites es which disturbed the•course of boost! life. It -• • -Rata ' frea thsi 1) • goy. a,. ve i , Royal ,Progeny. No one coi ning w ithin this descrip that Ministers shonld advise his Majesty to revoke it? was day•wben the aleanintS of discord aSould be at • *Xi nele3reiteLtubis ; ..Ringii lo th„„, „.7 ...,"' tion from the time of the passing of this act to the pre- He did not think they ought to take such a course but rest, and when every recollection that ilea trod to be ciiiialdsted an nest op Iph t fatilltt ata to _,,soit sent time. had been omitted in the Liturgy. Witb re- where the let 'called hi question was glaringly inapro- create disunion, or excite jarring . sentiaseins, should, if if the Saute *pinion. sped to the Consort of George the First, ho was willing per. This was not, in his opinion, 'wick a case as be. passible. be avoided. True, it nu F ht be said, that to re- wsuld ire tie to gage% the citti .-411se,'Wesv. should 'he inlit tr iel tlie HeiNii,lt to give the bene fi t of that to the other side. It bad al- had supposed, , and the conduct of the Queen was nut, in store her MajeitY's name to the Liturgy would now pro- hear, Elvin t/ip opposition benches.)::-11 spite of ufhat ready been most satisfactorily explained by the Hon. and his opinion, that which shonld col upon the House of duce the same effect, because it would amount to the was asserted by geatlesea on the nth* 'idle, 14 Wig Learned Member for Knarrieborbogb (Sir 4. Mackin- Commons to recommend her to any mark of grace or triumph of one party—(Hear) ;—hut he malt take leave lineiocediket the votes elite HOlie bad &hand, gone tosh.) There was every reason to suppose that George favour from the Crown; and though the motion of the to say, that those who would triumph on such so ices- a long wa towards tranqiiillittluit tt eaantrt• - • L t. the First was divorced at the time he ascended the Honourable Member might not be intended to do this , sion were net amongst the chief frequenters of our (ChArst)-: • ore he sat 'down be wtati trouble .the ___.... . _ _ _.. :_ ..... _____- -e -art:. .w...... , ..-...1A ..............1 i.. 1. %to:mate :r ...,,i.a_ churches.—fflear.) The latter did not always regard House with a words is to his general Cowduct in .. . partsable fbe items*? shserril ottiewhAtisiug In ' Irttt de• bit if be bidlosOontef t>teY lode, Menviresii; itfll taut Ibe-titsrett% ,tierfis the Litiref. be*ti itersitienhat fisli-esugiflgtitiess cr. link. he was sure that he bad ler Its 144: ee g it 0. Ili big ,ilf. law rne: 11 - 1 .4 P li ' 4V s fir. Ira