The Statesman. — London, England, 1815-06-01 00:00:00

~~ I aria • 111' ii, 1111 if THE STATESMIM ~~~~~ -.. ', • , •i upon him' to Pailiament.—[llearl,ltear n--Ale was soilage ;on this point he would only say,. that had Bare thnt this formed a stieng cue for enquiry, that •these beiet laid • before Parliament long since, to the'Commissioners might he intecroeated viols voce their entire liquidation he uns certain there would what" the y had done wi'th the Money that Parli4ment not he e dissenting voice. [ llcar !) They were bed approPriated ; 4l a very different purpose. The nut now callatg for such a discinsure, but they wore Prince woutfl not have reason to regret it; but it demanding an explanation of the misapplication of a weak! bring to light a cabal that 'merited exposition. specific sum which they had particularly granted.— If the Heise reftised 4 to exataine, the people would But it was said that in thisbusittess they were merely siy to them, you 'who are the , constitutional gpar. prying into forms- -forms undoubtedly they were, ilians Of the Iniblic purse, pay' no regard to the ex- but or that character for which, in better times, peuklitpre of, (At : Feeney that is • wrung from us by their ancestors had fought and bled.--Let them lams ioti ,; ebße, at the same time, you tome to us look to history, and see how often Parliament had ilia ask u to pay a tenth part of our income.-- : , refused grants to the Crown, on account of their jl/417 . -14 Theme wha'voted against the motion of former misapplication. In the reign of the ill-ad hi' No?` e) Fyietttl could only he considered as paying vise(' Charles the First, they would perceive how court &the c ir i ge . • He would call upon the cope. ; satielt the contest f or the controul of public grants trxgeetlemerVlOCotssider that if ever there was a embittered the politics of that contentious day ; tione..when it was peculiarly atecesatiry In coneiliate they would there see, that after The failure of ship , the people,,aud to convince them. that they were not meney, and the other tyrannical devices contrived by cello:tern to centribete •ene farthine. more thap .profligate lawyers and unprincipled judges, for the acne necessary, this was that period.—[!tear, hear]] pe'rsonal gratification of their Soverein—[Cries of ,Let the House refuse this enquiry, and 'they would ' /car !]-that that Monarch was compelled to de do more injury to his Royal Highness than could pos- ; sist from his perilous struggle, and to come down ;sib!) , be of eeted by atiyenquiry that was instituted. i tri Parliament, not only to desire ;applies at the • Mr. LEACH declared, that, after the moat anxious disposal of such Commissioners as they should them- atfention lie had been able to give the subject, he 'selves select from their own body, but also to yield sow no griintid for the motion of his Noble Friend, , to them the unrestricted expenditure of whatever The appropriation complained of, he utiderstood, sums they thought proper to appropriate.—[!fear:] dill mat, proceed from any cabal, as had been inti- ; —This wwas the essence of the Constitutive, and the ; maled, but was the deliberate act of a Right Hon. ; bulwark of public liberty ; there would at_once be and Learned Fiiend of . his, whit was no longer a ;an 'end of both, if the O ffi cers of the Crown could Member of that Ifoltse, but whose Parliamentary I depart from the exact qtiality of tire grants which .lifo had show n that be would be the last man to ad- j l• were confided to their use. It had been said, there vistrany unconstitutional act. (We understood the i was no misapplication : the case was simply this—a' :Liiartied — Gentleman to mean Mr. Adam.) His "grant had been confided to the Prince of Wales wheo : 2,,Ctoble.Friend . badstUted, that if the appropriation he became restricted Regent, for the due mainie batl-eveO•besiteeptsdient, still, as a breach of the fiance of regal authority. Suppose that the King had law, it,eugiti to he censured. So then the sup- recovered at the end of that year of his Royal High.; .rnint was rather about a matter of form than of sub- tress's functions, would Parliament, he would ask, I stance. [Lotetterier ,Of hear, hear! from the Op. have paid the 1 00 , 0001 . for the purposes to which pnsiiion benches.]—Tire !.earned Gentleman here en- it appeared to have been devoted ?--[ffear .tered into a Weal argument, to show that no such believed not ; then it was clearly a violation of prin- breach of the Act ofl'aillament had taken place, ciple; it was of this he co m plained,' and not of the i tiven in paint could be punishable in a misapplication of the sum itself ; for be considered Court of Justice. ;Bar he did net G....id h is vote That the slightest deviation in a matter of this : upon mereirteartieitrargomenti. • He would cun: ; vital importance should be met with the . direct re, tend that e•Abt of Parliament which gratstud the probation of the House, without at ail consideri ng loo,oool. it ‘ uot'hind. its application to any parti- .the extee4 of the, pecuniary amount ottashing to it; .cular pur apd that no 'additional expencel had For those.reasonspetrosted the ileuse.wonld adopt . • • • _..gar been drum's upon the pnbli6 in consequence of the the.motion of his NOV Friend, And by so put _appropriation of it.WhiCif but taken place. *hat an mid to the possibility ail there ever hearing those difference did theprecisiusede of its application make, forms described as technicalities, which were, in point to the puhlie,when they would sustain no loss by it? of fact,, the. vital spark of public liberty, :[hear, It Was MWese grounds. that lie could not concur hear, hide with his &bie : Friend in calling for enquiry. Thi SO.LICITOH.-GENERALcOuteaded that no Mr. t. • WYtiNE said he had listened with one denied the obstruct right of ParliaMent to up unfeigned regret tii..the doctrines which his Learned propriate the employment of its grants ; but the Friend had just kid down. His argument went di- eery words of the Resolution by which the_ sum of . rectly against the privileges of Parliament in con- 100,0001. orts granted, were,* that it was to cover troulifig the Crown iu the appropriation of the public expences that hart been incurred, or that might after money, and against the substance of the Constitution wards be incurred. The Act had been silent es to itself. Granting that the purposes to which the sum I the particular mode of appropriation, which was left was applied were to be provided for, was this to be to the advisers of the niece Regent. , done in the face of a direct Act of Parliament, and Mr. WORTLEY observed, that there appeared to. were the rules which our forefathers had laid down t be no doubt as to the bleach of the Act of Podia for controuling the Crown in the appropriation of ment ; all the extra expellees attending the out-fit the public money to be treated as mere technicalities, were to he defrayed out of the grant : but he was not mere matters of form, the breach or the observance prepared to vote for a Committee, as there could be of which was a matter of unimportance? In fact, no question that such a proceeding would imply eett it was a high misdemeanour to apply the grants of sure. It would convey an opinion out of the house, Parliament to any other purpose than that for which thit the money had been spent in an improper Mil. they had been voted. The money, for instance, ner, whereas there certainly was no appearance of voted for the army, could not be constitutionally its having been applied to arty sinister purpose. The applied to the service of the navy. lie denied, also, country, therefore, had. not suffered. At the same that it had been applied to liquidate debts for the i time the expenditure of the Civil List had undoubtedly payment of which Parliament was in any degree created a strong sensation in the country, and he pledged. The Haase had never in any shape recog- felt convinced that the strength of the minority on a nized the claims which the Prince Regent might con- late debate on the subject would do good. shier, and justify, as honourable claims. When, Lord FOLKESTONE expressed his surprise that therefore, it gave his Royal Highness this money, it I the Hon. Gentleman should acknowledge that a via could not possibly hare in view the liquidation of lotion of the Act had been committed, and yet de such claims, but in fact specifically voted its appro. clam his intention to vote against enquiry. priation to , defray the expences which his Royal Mr. cAucrtAFr warmly supported the motion. Highness had incurred by the assumption of the He had heard that night that some person had ad •llegency. He regretted to hear that a Learned vised a mis-appropriation of the grant. It was fit Friend of his was the adviser of' the measure ; but I that the House should take cognizance of such an Tn. ch as he respected hint, he could not alter his abuse. I law of the question hi a constitutional light. . . Mr. wommEir explained amidst : loud cries of Mr. LONG contended, that though the House ;Question, question; . was never pledged to pay the honourable claims. on A MEMBER, whose name we could not learn, hie Royal Highness, yet it was aware that such I stated that be should feel himselfjostified in voting claims existed, and had in fact recognized them, in- ; against the motion, not only upon the general prin. asmuch as 50,0001. a year had been apprepi iated for . ciple of loy'alty to his Sovereign, but on the grounds their payment out of the revenue of the Prince of rso ably stated by the NalbleSecretary for Foreign Wales. That annual sum would now be more Affairs. speedily liberated. The Right Honourable Gentle- I Lord MiuroN expre s sed himself to be as much matt here entered into a statement to show, that ; surprised as the Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Calcntft), at since the commencement of the present reign, a sum ; the little connection which could be traced between of 2,328,0001. had been given by the Crowe out of the argument and the conclusion of the Ilon: Gen fonds of its own, for the service of the country ; i Ileum' who preceded him (Mr. Wortley). He trust while the money that Parliament had given for the ed , however, it was possible that his support - might payment of the debts of the Crown had only exceeded : yet be obtained before the question went to a vote. the above sum by a surplus of 301,0001. In order to secure it, he wished to give notice, that Mr. PONSON BY declared, that he had listened if the question should be negatived, it uas his inten with great pain to %%hat had fallen front his lion. and lion to move a Resolution, declaring " that it ap- Learned Friend (Mr. Leach) in the course of the de- peared to the House that the sum of 100,0001. grant ba e, than which he never remembered to haveJteard ed to his Royal Highness on the commencement of any thing more unconstitutional. [Hearn Was his Regency, had been applied by the Commissioners that House, _which was so well acquainted with the to purposes contrary to those specified in the Act of nature of those privileges, for the maintenance of Parliament. which it.had so often struggled with the Peers and The House then divided, the. Crown, now to listen to the snexim, that it had ; For the motion 105 Arehart it - 225 -nosight to controul the sums which it hid appre-.! htnj wily —l2O priated, and that it was not a violation. of •law.for I The gallery was not opened during the discussion sis. Officer of the Crown to divert from one P."1: 1 °. 143 on Lord Milton's Resolution, but it was fi nally 'le - 'to another • the money which was intritstpd for a Gee- gatived without a division. . ialifit . Ose ?. :Such was not the principle for which they The Irish Newspaper and . Stamp Exchange Bills oricFcentepded, when their ancestors fought up the .were read a second time each, and ordered to be Wert ,• of .the subject in contending: for the safe- committed. • guar, of . ,their freedom, by firmly holding. the na- The Lottery. Bill.was read a third time and Pissed ; 'Ara ' sipply. [Bear n The .defence which his as was also the Bill for the encouragement of ex ". ~ . 110 1 1..a4 Learned Friend set 'up, _was, in point of periments in discovering the Longitude. fat.t' 2 7O,.lleary accusation of an absent friend (Mr.: • The Irish Stamp Regulation, Stamp Duties, and Aclant),* for whoa] he (Mr.'Ponsonby) held so high Sugar Bills, as also the African Goods Bill, were se r, 'regard, .that he could morrow (this day). not contemplate the possibi- Teraily committed, and ordered to be. reported . to lily of hie having been privy to such a responsibility • , as tiVeewith whith.he was chaiged, without 'feelings , GovEltitthlt•AiNkmE. 1 • of .r i4iret, tig(f.estOnishmeut. It was impossible be Sir a. H ERON moved for Copies,.of the seven!' could Ikie t - so pirideCted himself. As to the. cec.og- Affidavits made in the island of St. Dominica,:relatlne ;ninon ) of Off delds. of the Prince of Wales by. Pie..7' to the enquiry into the conduct . of Governor Ainslie. lianre,itr," lehad not the, s li g htest knowledge of suF,frl . STAIIe DUTIES. a tali. )den: if it fund been the case, it still would ! . The ,CgAISTCI L/194 of be EXCHEQUER. nolluitify the4iecnniery appliction 4 n,bich had . been . : moved,. that ...the_,_ IP:nte2 sloiild resolve itself into a oillitifietn 7 . 'The? tvere askedirthey meant to call h . CnMmittee nf*Wayt and 'Means. for a statement of the debts ; of this Mention Per. 1 The Speaker hating, left the Chair ; the Right I b. 1 ,_ _ • • .=-:z r :J .~ . ' • • Iran. Gentlentan'obsejecd,. that he proposed, at so late en hour of the night, to omit several parts of the new Wee of increased duties, till, there should be a fuller totendance of Members and an ampler oppor tunity of discussion.. Among these were the Stamps on Promissory Notes, Bills of Exchange, Law Pro ceedings, and Bankers' Licenses. lie had no dispo sition to take the llouse by . surprise, or to press to an advanced stage any measure which had not al ready received the apparent sanction and approbation of the House. Sir CHARLES MONCK enquired whether the Right Hon. Gentleman intended to bring on that part of the schedule which related to the new tax on Ad vertisements. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER stated, that he had had conferences with several per sons who appeared to represent the sense of those individuals who were more immediately interested in the measure;and an arrangement had been agreed on which was supposed to meet the views of both parties. The general result of his arrangement was, that the progressive duty on Advertisements should be abandoned, and that in lieu of it there should be imposed a common duty of an additional sixpence, making the whole duty 3s. 6d.; and-also an addi tional duty of one-halfpenny upon the paper itself. Sir CHARLES' MONCK conceived that a new question arose out of this pito, for transposing the new duties on sadverti,tr;-eits and newspapers. It was generally rons;:: `,•it the universal circula tion of knowledge pr,.,,ret.i by the daily journals, and other periodical publications, was one of the `most extensive and .substantial-ndvantages resulting from the liberty of the press. The house, therefore, ought to determine whether it might not be a duty they owed to the Odic, whose interests were most concerned, to . step.in between Government ,and the editors of ne wspapers, who be could easily appre ' herid , might coincide in an arrangement convenient to both, but by s un means eqaally beneficial to the pub : lic. He confessed lie was very. iverse:to seeing the necessities of the state supplied. by means Allich seemed to tend to the suppression of general infor mation. The Right Hon. Gent; he hoped, would at least have no objection to postpone the resolution, for the present. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER Assented to the wish of the Hon. Bart. . Sir MATTHEW %V. RIDLEY suggested the pro , priety of deferring the consideration of the new ' duty on Letters of Administration, as some regula tion was required relative to the mode of taking out `fresh letters after the stamps of the former had been spoiled. The other Resolutions were then agreed to, and the Report ordered to be. received to-morrow (this dgy). Mr. FITZGEI),ALD gave .notice, that he shoola the neat de4r ekosefer.lease to bring in four Bills for the better regulation of the Excise Duties in Jreland. —[4 laugh.] • The CHANCELLOR of .the EXCHEQUER then gastatoticss i than on, Monday next he. should bring forss'ara the postponed stamp Duties. Adjeetned; at half-past One o'Clock. . • " 'LAT ATTE !JAG ESCR. - a.... 41.4, a. Aka. 4., a I . , but the exclusive possession of the tam), and migft have maintained trespass agninst the owncr.of tho land, if he had interrupted him in the enjoyment fp his right (6 East. 602). The renting cows, to I' fed exclusively in particular fields for a certain ra ft of the year, had been held to be a. tenement withi u , the statute (4 T. It. 671) : and so had the after. grass of a field taken without specification of the time in which it is to be mown (4 T. IL 348) ; and a rabbit-warren, with a cottage upon it, although the tenant have no right in the soil of the warren, except that of entering upon and killing the rabbits there (3 T. it. 77'2). Mr. COVitTENAY, on the other side, was stopped by the Court. Lord ELLExnonoucat.—The cases on this subject have gone to the very extremest limits of common sense. This was a case of buying a lot at an auction, and not of coming to settle on and renting a tenement. Mr. J. LE Br.tmc.—An occupation of forty days has nbt been made out in this case. Order quashed. TILE SING V. HAYNES. This was an arrest of judgment upon an indict. ment against a miller, for delivering musty, unsound, and nun holesome flour, as and for the produce of four bushels of barley entrusted to him to be ground. Mr. 'PADDY objected to the indictment, first, that no venue was laid to the receipt of the corn ; it did not state that the Defendant was on such a day a miller : an indictment must contain the day and year of every particular fact charged, and this defect wai not helped by verdict,. 14 East, 406; and secondly„ that the corn was not averred to be for the suste. nance of man, or that the Defendant knew it was an. sound and unwholesome. •De cited Rex v. Wheat. Icy, 2 Burrow, 1125, in which it wag held that the delivering less beer than contracted for as the due quantity 'was not indictable; and. Reg n. Wilderg; 1 (iS. 112 S). in which an indictment for at similar o f., fence, accompanying the ale with a letter of war. mice that it consisted of - the quantity, tees quashed. There was also an objection as to the incompleteness of the two counts of the indictment, theeestend of which began with no new finding of tite—Jeltr,* and did not call the mill a certain other mill.. , • Mr. 80cL.%0 contra, said,-that the Indictient had been precisely copied from the Crown Circuit Companion. 'The COURT denied the authority of that book. Mr. HOLLAND alluded to the REM edition, which I had been edited by a Gentleman at the Bar. Re i cited 1 Sess. Ca. 217, and Reg. v. Bower, 1 Cowper, 323, in which it was held indictable in a goldsmith to expose to sale wrought gold under. the .sterling alloy, as and for gold of the true standard weight. . Lord ELLENBOROVGIG—The indictment is defer. lave in counts : the breach might have been made to Apply to both counts: the purpose of delivery, Piz. to grind for reward was incorporated in the allegsr i tion of fraud, and must have a venue, as it cauld not be rejected as surplusage. The womi um:hole ; some did not ex vi teraiini mean for the food of man. The Court could not distinguish this from the ordi nary fraud in Ilex v. Wheatley, end erect it biro au • indictable offence. . . . Rule absolute for arresting the judgisent. 1 1 1„/ A lIRIAC F, should-be the foundation of social ' TILE KING V. CHAf.r. Iti ARUNDFL WRIGHT. 11 LL losppin , s4, wl -. .ich is often disturbed through the pities' Tito ATTORNEY -GENERAL moved for a rule to oca f.srin the 01 ism not thoioe precautions which would sei ass-them the enylvirst:nt 'of Host great domestic bleogni, show cause why a criminal information should not be filed agaiiist the sole Proprietor, Printer, and 1 1 ::; ''' n 'e .h l .. )' ;•C i v rte ry cn i ns aa t k if:l7. ) :n a h.o r b i t; been i t a t in t te be d 1+ 11 ; 1 disease , "I : iVeti or % k W ; Publisher of a new Sunday Paper, called the hotted by et t crtain habit commit-fed at an early age. wjenara rostcripl, for a libel, in the 3d Number of that Pa- t iv ,a i n ri :. , t: t s .. l,;..hi r :ir , r is t pre,inns ii, - .. un in est i t n ertit i that ks, fir l te f is indisp:ortir . per, upon the character of Colonel Berkeley and of , mite the ~W .l ll. For no di - g or s i l l:::, have c e ent . rihut nd l ei r m l te Lerd and Lady Deerhnrst. The newspaper in'Aues- j essentially to de: tens 11+314,ot:it happiness than tease which Are tlon professed to give a serious, of scandalous `rlttec- i i hr ion c =7:lu e r " e i tl . treuirdtd pleasure, it was thisci""itra. Messrs. CURRIE awl Cos. fur these I:.st dotes of characters, in the hold lon, an d the present '3O years. to direct their studies and attention e xclusively to the 'libel appeared under the title of 46 The late fttat treatment said cure of the Velo real Di(ease, and the disardetv pas." It informed thipublic that an accommodation je.duirseilfhtylletiteeir.dtrie'riller".:ivl7 l l;: li tt . st o so f lernrigemeow of the system pia the 01.C.fillidefale et hoill.lv”, had taken place between the parties in a tate call. , ‘tbiell brings. on those distre-sing debilities and deficiencies that con. which arose from a recrimination on the side (if L r i e l le ,;; ll , l e ie r i, elhtl 7„ ( ~1 7 11,1",:fii.1711,44-0:11/1c• i The i successtul re frail fair. It then stated that soon after Aar. 1 racise, r a. J.A.s.- p hut , '"C•4l:4 11111 i 111 V, IV i. i 4; k 2 a re =l e t ti:.."eartala ppose tjae riage of Lord and Lady D. they paid a visit of some itie hi c:italogs t oc i o e f i !olive, intlint it ies. It Nelltoyes every person weeks at B. Castle, and that during the honey-moon ' i t i i ie p t rs ta f 4 we itt io t in l ii suei tt i . i t if ts caTin t e l l r ces v ni t fir h o n o ur, t"seek Si. -ie "'f try litch Mtsen t . the Proprietor of the Castle, in a moment of laths'. : CCltftl 1:: and Cu. 'elairn the swietios of sootastle authority. cation, as introduced to the bed-chamber of the wife, ! . t a i s n w c e u t t re aV o lle i lettlto hese v o ni tsy of , u t neirti t rrad h ict i e d d fads. i ln profe..irie Who in the dark unsupiciouly received the ravish& 7 vire i bin, scre t thie. as all t m l e s ; must be, be, sof " t u b t e ex . ist "d ence m oor:a l. :re for her husband. No names were mentioned in khis 61latnide,, thw offer their wiislance as regularly ediraird Atenshens or t i Rosati Colleges' of gut se 'paragraph, but Colonel Berkeley was evidently.. E d i n j,, s o ) .. skht a nd' recent cases hf eVerilit o i!iati Lu 7 i ti o oa n ?le d pointed at as 64 the gallant Colonel ;"" and he now radically cured in the short space of two days. Those of the swore that he was the only Colonel who was Pro: lures, opl a i i t 6 n:le o r t reaa such's!, Ofistruciions, inveterate Stric i i prietor of a Castle, and that the intention. of the.libel sre t inx eared. Several lit t oljemvu t at a:il * f i rell e tl lt e=i tif n t i ll iS' e t i nt was to impute to him thecrime of ravishment—thft respectabi!ity have bee.. otyer the ewe of Messrs. Currie and the paragraph was wholly unfounded, and was a . t . s ',..•. l6 : l „ . .l l l:: i r i V ce :' ved f M l Tl P: e d i '!" t of scandalous insinuation, and a false and malicioas guest 1110 refer eters may he made B t l e . t a h l tt P` a n s a ratill t c ` to u r i 3 e.' e: :- aspersion of his character. . jee . ore tura, stricierw, . . ! deuces of the decided ' , superiority of Messrs. Currie sad Co.'s The COURT thought the truth of the libel not qu . ite . fr.periolien.:il tohte l ar ye e , 1 1 .1 „ ;: , an ai d nn 4 y . ; r ar ,t t a ire er t t e enr ca le re sne ,.i n .: t a r ci ars su . l ic i t: a rc; 'sufficiently negatived, to authorise them to iuterfere. Heaviside •Illit wiles stirs:paw of equal t tnittrnee, who att..uiptel in the extraordinary manner of granting a criminal . . ' ' tt . y the niiplicatinta .il the Watrrierstie,. "siithtnio sec .thei.r cur e m information: it was usual, unless the Prosecutor was . i t'or e'e jl ' om e nla ` 4 ot e ....4 4 ... l re 4 M C n ' i l i,.. b l v e c e:iv k . ' n e r tle:.m he ri;eun'tretgal.e'rlee: abroad, as the charge against him was so general as, tarirn,... th,.m•tnnim• for dear restoration to sound mid s igainist health. It was sett t , i ' them. wsolieitesi, from the t 4), 01, to render it .. .I incauvenient 9 to deny it SpeCific : ll % , I ir , Ole Fait,. Oa had laboured uo:der tam diso;es-iag s..ne to an modo el formii. . ; ul ,a:,146 . fu! I 0 :. 0, rs ;he load been ender the CM i• ' f .leverA The Arrou ',ICY-GENERA I. Said, he s h ouL i have co Sitr;:essis of pii.fessional eminence, y o w l ., of . h,,,, i „jr.,,,ka.!,ila difficulty in procuring, ' a fuller and mere particolosr Iterevoontlairliet vim( from the , superior issethod of treatateht a flidaiit, for which purpose the case stands over. .sAdaptrel and pssraas d joy Messrs. I. urrie and Cu.- hr re. eibvJ . radical cure is the Snort space of one tuonlii : , i • • " Ma% 18, 1810. TLC K ;NG V. CROSS AND OTHERS. These Defendants were brought 7e at pl.a,tor ill cousin wurating la lir. ,To D c NU KU 1 li., 107.. patson.g , rd. n, _ ifor the nuisance in plying Greenwich coaches qt :r" rric. the perfect rh,nthlnthstei...l of his health, in coo M""" r " of his wild used artnoisshle 're/unseat of SalClllfell in the Um-. I : Charing-cipss. • ug for . .ill . u‘vo -141 1 -' 1 1. . 4 L ' orc(-7---- ‘ Ittio; Hemet) adoettina he aas slot for isagy years stjosed 'i'' The COURT intimated they would require two * much cosnalit odd' fleting' Ito., pain ; sod he entertain , nn sureties in 2501. each, for the abatement of the d " °ll4 °fhb 4444°44 ' 61 " 4 " d ' 4 ' 4°1444 1'611.'111"A attention, it perfect nod radical curt- of that dors id rodent's int As he an, nuisance; and gave them time to procure such secu.- tod u,:traager .t.. Cite utarister 1 1 441 tilling tried th e co npinit.l• rity. he 'bus i: id lit' ;sister.' flow pi fair trial good ain't lamina' him. (CROWN PAPER. ) , to pu'q th a tribute.of applause to Dr. Laurie, which he."'" ' hly feels, n•sel shall res.:, be must ready :Mt williug to ;moot - TIM KING V. THE INHABITANTS OF BOWNEcS. ' Llbse ". . This was a case from a northern Sessions in which , .iarried Tiomeoi.'whri hove loose been l• '. • • disappointed in their the pauper had a house in the parish value 41. and ...,,al;ces sodb defects are cis;atsie b. ' Medical ;kill ; and althea': I 1 - assured that in most is the by auction a crop of oats then growing Ito the re , cle re3aiiv ;II of :arts Impediment , be an ulliect of il.asht and a!" ; certainty with ot hers, yd, the ewe of sock defects, by the ern of the . value- of 121. the greater part of which . carried away before the expiration of forty days, awl ! d ro u e ' s a s l cri k " "t "f u r valt r 9 jt. the "44elfeleile of Ita ' .! l; et ri ' l . • ,y an env.) :19p.lealim, to M, in ee. C a me 8 , 1 3 a. the question was whether this constituted a tenement I 1 within 13 and 14 C . 2, 12 , which re a rli ti ::u ll s t :T;;4 l !n e 4ant "P e " :l ' p e nn p lets al...- r d s . ite "l2 r e ir i nm ' and lprn ez e i ror e inner d : lo b l ic o- r ;• C. confines the 1 comp mrt cif. Jim) be calimomir.M evtienti of rimer Sri. 1.1.4. Power of removal to cases where persons conic to ' the greatest seeree) and hod oar. at'their huse. Na. 107 . " si. ion-milt n Patients in the • .ortri, deseribing the pas , Iclt.e" • . sottle in any tenement under the value of 101. within . 40 days.after such persons come so to settle. .. of their rasa, lt:e, ant Made Of tiV imp; Vael.v.l4l a Mali Hcce i.:l ' advice and tnetliein..,, the slat , ' trill beer/en or sent to :so, ,s s i Mr. SCARLETT and Mr. G. LAMB contended, that 4 .the.,kios , l''ra• To t ; II" , "' that secrecy tA es-e "" ".. e '''' detiiikiiigs the postage 1.1 leiters,may be added as are .cc.ate 'this was a su ffi cient ,tenement. The corn was not tur,medtrirres ' —ttii ' tiatioareardea. ripe when the pauper* bought it,.and be had, there- r. - - • . fore an interest hi the land, which was to mature - ii (2 Taunt. 38). Ile had not the mere right of entry, COURT OF KING'S BENCE!, THAT SI. MATRI MONY. LONDON Prip.pet af,d ptmic:ed by b. Loysi.s. Sy•yrser al Orswc, S. Flee y4fryt / I' <~ ~,~~~ ,s•'.