The Statesman. — London, England, 1823-06-27 00:00:00

~' sat bed pet shook . frosaile.daty. • Ike .rain e i J e raveclistrite bid lima ginesettod voila* *lord . nor, iris, that be bad slimed. Sir Hatrommt fiat nin the eemusiesiom of ilikroor. Itlitypenbil p avert that Sir H. lwes_van I* Me minersiMirma of MI ity in Ireland (hear). WI. *la awni of the farts to in: 'faint. whiell the H0n....04 limamaid Gets: wished to s, ere a eonitnitteet (hear). triateeepect to the appointment o r plaeciffs, if it were propiiied to take from those- cot rations which now possessed that right its future eXer .. bilranl4be necessary to institute a separate isquiry " ' ' is particular case. He (Mr. G.) dented altogether - - bof the fashionable imputations on the adminie of justice in Ireland. If mat-practices existed, • • would give the Government More pleasure than , ..imppreas them. The imputation against the sheriffs • ' trekud rested on the evidence of a witness who found. " his statements on what he called the general opinion. • best opportunity on which be (Mr. G.) could attend :' ' t committee, he would take care that that witness ~, . .,..k be exansirell thoroughly, in order that, if any lion existed for hie evidence. the abate might ....stec With the same view, he would ask the . . , . aid - Learned Gentleman to furnish hint with any : . otos be might possess, and he pledged himself ./bat the subject gould be investigated, and the evils • agegirnsed. ;He disbelieved that the practice of bribing gialtah.Sheriifs-essuld prevail to the extent supposed. flak at the panels now lyinglon the table, and the same. illoidd he found to be of the highest respectability, The - -light Hoe. Gentleman then read over one of the panels istillepport of his statement. Much. was probably circa linged- by„erag of rumour, especially in the society from WNW Ms petition Lid proceeded, thatwoold not *adore ... *light minify:, it was therefore Most unreasonable .that the Hon.-and Learned Gentleman should call on • `-rise House so grant a committee on such grounds as he -, bad laid. A, to the revenue tribunals, be begged leave to say, - that the srstem of them was undergoing a re- T vision, and he bad every confidence is his Hon. Friends, ' lilts Cammissiotters of Inquiry, thit they Would institute .endefectory regelations and improvements in that depart ` *-eilian. Indeed he knew It was their intention to - institute mirilloaal which would eittrect the abases to which the - Mon. Member hid adeettell. t . As to the charge of Judge i Illetcher, which the Hon: Member had relied upon and ..spisted, althoorb he . (Mr. tioulbton) did not wish to • lightly of "the charge of a judge from the bench, he was not disposed to credit the accuracy it •4 , - report. • He was the more disposed to pled, • reliance on the accuracy df that reported speeish, *other j udge had been questioned by Govern ,itylli as to certain prieciples and opinions which were ".reported in the newspspers, and attributed to him. That t,' - . ,Judge (ire believe Lord Norbury) bad diselaheedi dm Opinions there assigned to him; and a still stronger] • n for his diebelieflothe accuracy of Judge Fisteher i ai atharge of 1814 was,. that when he lately made a cheeks . , . which similar opinions to those of the charge of 1814' .Were attributed to him, so far from adopting thee'', he o,lleclerki that they were materially at variance with those , -which lie held. Of the cops ienohs which took place .'; beth on capital and minor chaiges, one.third, on an , average, came before the Government of the country, and l '4ll the several' Memorials which bad betn addressed in .1 . application toe mercy, no complaint whatever, in any intone., bad been preferred against the juries by whom the several verdicts had been awarded. Of the judges ", •so complaint whatever was made, and the judges who re ported oo the severe misery/ bleb came before Govern- I . wient, had iti no instance represented the improper con e Ititution of the juries before whom - Irish bad taken • place which had been referred to Government. , Ifjt were said which be expected would not be _Ha s a case, that the 4 , 4 ,!. Justypiptexe.desiront of xencealing ahem wits,. thott,3l l 1, they did lisfatikien or (Mr . G.) would aimed to the qu. aciprotiapetitiisatiivehich Mill beet prvierrief, to which al; T I: legations of the partiality of juries were not to be found. To *is assertion. there wets only two exceptions, • which were in the progress of investigation, 'but 1.: which had not as yet bees reported upon. AA the ; • memorials had been examined and revised, not only by % himself, but by the Attorney-Gederal for Ireland, who would , sot surely be Inspected of any disposition to countenance say partiality Which would operate injuriously to the fair I. Interests ante Roman Catholics of Trotted. if he wanted . further proof to sustain him is the refesalof the Inquiry that was now delanded, It would be found in. the evidence at' • • forded by the petition Itself, and by those who bad,algned Ile' Mr. O'Connell. in a speech which he had lately. Made, wed which was - reported in the Debit; Ere:tiny Pest, said , thaj there were some judges who were proud ornaments of the bench °flatlet.. le Included the four judges of the King's '. Beech, whom it'would be unfair to de:l were men of great ` , learning, and of such strict int-grity as he didriot expect • even to see on the heath lo feels:W.—(beer, hear.) • Ho • Would even hold them up to the world as bright *nipples of judicial ability and honesty. At least it was admitthid thit there was one court in which justice was Impartially admi nistered, and if in the minor courts partiality was menifetti. id, the earieved party might mike an appeallwthat mart of superior Jurisdiction for a new trial. It appeared that ea a lto s b ip y s o r sd iao t e he wl a t r h , . i t in h a e r n y um oo b se r ofonfe business,' i trial. neu m ov ed ;t" * kln th tke r, Court ewi ercrueinna ti t f a ne m ot ions u King's o, w l: I f aese thatcu is ,tii i nfi n de dintnlreland, Ir eland the inference and an l: l e l I sl e t E n t E ngl and ,.; Pit o l ti e : and this wee only a fair proportion, whin the ex ten t'' Jurisdiction of both courts were taken into coneirierstiott.: 7 (Hear, hear.)i It was admitted that there was this upright court of appeal, - yet there appeared no increase ofhtiotions; I isted no neceisity for such impede. With the testimony of . hf o r i . n O t :C l o u nn th el e % th the ien pe oe ti o ti f o t n ha er, sta tte teine wbu4 s d o b r e al s l at f i s s e li ts ed , boon was • point. obliged thus to deal In an abstract manner, with the asset ! tient) of the Hon. aid Learned Member. 'lf be would state any instances of abuse, he would pledge himself that they .. should be inquired into, and it wield give him (Mr. Goal ' butt) satisfaction to have an opportunity of correctiprthem . If they were proved to exist. But he could cot secede so a motion which was grounded on no statement of facts, width ' consisted in generst.assertion, and which, if encouraged by . Parliement now, Might go to the extent of vilifying.pvety character and the whole adoluiraration by general and -dr elamatory abuse.—(Hear,) Sir H. PARNELL. wisbejl to state a few facts which' • induced him to support the Motion of his Hon. Friend. ' Ile was a Member of the Committee on the every Ipws , . and evidence was there given that the reason why capital was not vested in Ireland, and •why security was not given on Irish property, was the dials:salty that was foetid iii executing writs there. The Hon. Baronet then ad. vetted to the evidence taken before the Usury Committee, ',and read passages which went to support the charges *hick had been brought forward. With regard to Judge Fletcher, the Right Honourable Gentleman had said, that 'the account of his charge could not be depended upon as terrect. He had been informed that the speech was • liribted under the correction of the Judge himself. He would not make any remarks upon the measures in' pro gress, for purifying the Magistracy, 'further than by ex pressing his opinion. that unless the Government did a gveat.deal more than they had done, the evil would not hi remosmE Col. BARRY said, dint with permission of the House, he would pule soil bbServations upon the body, from whom the Petition proceeded. If the Government of 'Mind permitted such conduct as this be trusted they would soon be coMpelled to give up the rein of Govern- ment, which it would-he evident they soAlisgraced. It wtilierket Insanity tWidlow a Government to bold out the doctrine tha t . the ()Attlee Party wished to massacre theii'LpmWentit,-.-They deemed to insinuate that es ap• • peal to ih sdind - fecit. would be justifiable. He was fret to, ndinat Shia the Hos. sod Learned Gentleman *Mel opened the, befinias.bad made a very eloquent speech, but that ItoreCh was particularly meagre in point of tot ' - This the.. Honoree& Goodman seemed to achuit te ;r: nit was oto be supposed that Shoes who instruc l Honoatalle Geittlttnan would bare suppressed them foga LL Tl:g S' "mivelv of 11 9 11 1, 1 01111 L- Tbo wbolo language - which Was used ip thallsillismmwasi•jlbel on the gentlemen of Ire land. No Melt it was boebaitic tad poetic enough. It roared the opiionents• of the party, with resorting to the Bible for incitements to murder and massacre. This be declared to be a malicious falsehood; it was similar to a muse( falsehoods published lately under the title of " The Orange System Unmasked," which was nothing but a mass of base and absurd falsehoods. Allusion had been made to a charge said to be delivered by Mr. Jus tice Fletcher. But what would the House say. when lie infornied them that he was the Foreman of the (frand Jury to whom it was pretended that charge was deli vered; and, that, in subsequent casversations with that Learned Judge, be had agreed lit opinion with bins (Col. Barry) that scarcely one seetence to these pretend. ed charges had ever been uttered by him. He would. however, refer the house to a charge given by Sir. Wm. Smith, a man who was favourable to the Catholics, de claring that greater indulgence was extended to the t. ,e thence than was ever shown to the Protestants. He was' sorry the Hon. and Learned Member should lend himself to make use, even on an occasion of political necessity, of a paper surreptitiously obtakned fur the purposes of s ,desperate faction. This, however, had been done ; and although he did not mean to impute any lesprmer tootle, to the Hon. and Learned Gentleman, he would not let t h e occasion pass without expressing his reprobation of the eon &let of those who had thus obtained the paper. The Hon. and Learned Gentleman had spoke highly of the Administra• RN 0 Justice in this country; but it wo not many years • that the Greed Jury of theeoutty'of Lancesterhad Ad ' the unoalified approtrattou of the/fon. sad Leans- PS . Tale simple fact was, that so long as men arose mina, I excitement would end its nix every where.— He regretted it; be wished it were ethervilse. He would have political excitement discouraged as much as possible. l and he was sorry to say he attributirlmaels pf this to the vi ' sled elate of the public press. Hs would entrust the Go tailment of Ireland, even such as it was, with additional pimp to enable it to stop inflammatory publications, and image the angry feelings of party. Mr. C. HUTCHINSON said his Right Hon. Friend who linkfaor tpoken had arraigned the conduct Of the Catholic )fleeting at Dahlia, but that Muting had been occasioned by the Insolence of those who called themselves the exclu sively loyal of the King's-Mali subjects. They were a fac tion of ,pen who had created the Rebellion of 1799, and bad done every thing in their power to outrage the feelings of the people. He was far from approving of every thing which bad been 'bidet these Meetings; for he always thought 4 , • subject. which they discussed would be better left in the 'hands of the Parliament.—(Hear, hear.)—But much of the irritation, so far as regarded religious feeling, had been oc casioned by the absurd, mad, sod disgraceful appeals to the 'Protestants made by Sir Harcourt Lees, through the medium of the press. , He called that'condect absurd, mid, aid dill graeeful: though he admitted , that religious feellags apart, Sir H. L i en was A very respeetehliClergyman. The Right sifted lion. Gent, alluding to the charge, of Mr. Justice , Fletcher had deafen di' t the Learned Judge bed delivered .it; but ,it was singular thil that Learned Judge had neyee disivowed the publication. With regard to the papOr alidded by his lionourable and Learned Yrmnd, and Use ,s e of, which was condemned by the Hight lion. Gtelliiiiien, he contended that his Hon. and LelllCti iirlenderasjestiffedia referringto it, as it had beiy.rriesltiisly before the publid. After a fan Observats in defence if the Irish 'Oherecte4 widish he catended did not yielo la rains': to tap.Ea c list ht . Shelton. Member proceeded to remark on the injustice: 1 marking out a large body of respeetahia men, as depraved and unworthy to fill tha responeibie °acne Of society. Re .submitted that his. lloso,ble and rued Friend had I , madeasati cue for sandhi the petit 'to a Committee l l as it spoke - 11m sentiments o :lIX milli . the population of Irelaad...Bot . it tho leagues. of . . Allocate could cosild. he enderetoorr at charging those wit° administered • Isere with iniustfec, he should Devotee the charge.; gall e rilil let lai.eied the Petition. it s stmt.,* 1 4 t o .4 pfeintif griers: e t b rhicteally, he regarded exclualois• Pala ' . emirs* ehtlita.. is Petiddisers felt themselifilio' be lif. Baited end i oipp , alcoottnot,therefoeir he eeereeted to address'. nin iesities to I: w or t of, their compigints in very measured longuage; d blow sure the House would not be,dispoaed tot look it . the Expressions of such Peti tioners tea scrupulosisly. The opposition to their claims had not *leg to staid upon in point of argonseakkad the question, seas, whether Parliament would venture to reject . those claims which were the claims of six minims, of the moat warlike and elliciont of the oispulation. Whifinisters, would take his advice,tvhich he admitted was that of a dar' Bided political stymy, and if they desired to keep itself yisess,he woulik(ay to them, ' "Admit the ashes of theca thollcs; and restore Ireland to her rights." Should a iota bination of the Foreign Despots be formed against the li berty of England (and nothing was more likely), be bored' ask, whether the support of elk millions of such people es he had described was not most desirable? ; /Is, sherd** should warmly support the motion. ...It Mr. DALT said, the Petition contained char& against the Protestants at large. He had•adwaya advor mood the Catholic Ifiaime warmly and eincerety, ;, boa bi I would net compromise the eitaraater • a .the. rrotasset religion for the sake of a little transient portiiiritprs - 1 He admired the talents and , skxterity mi the - lien. and Learned Member ; bat kmmestwed the Ileuse time he bad ' 'for many years served on Juries in Ireland, and., had over koown.asv instance of partiality, or coytion , ong them.—And why sliomid be ? 41, bad beWahei 'Armour of serving wills Catholic Jurors —(1 - tear)...sad le, as a Protestant, would say that they had always doeted themselves rightly.—,' 10 petisioojeas f a l s e f beginning to end--ft did not contain the sentiment, 'tbe Catholics in general.—lt. bad not the_ signatore 4 ef an:rTatholic Noldeman or Catholic Baronet. He dermal too that it had the signatures of the leading persons in Dublin; and it was hut,feiroess to the Catholics theme selves to believe thWeise false statebsents contained IS this petition would dot beaddpted or sanctioned by the*" Mr. V. FITZGERALD' expressed his surprise thatlfie Hon. Friend opposite (Mr. Hutchinson), should - ask die House to treat this Petition as the Petition of six mil lions of people, when he himself, with that honour and justice which belonged to him, had, from his own ex perience, negatived the aspersions which it had cast up on the administration of justice.—He bad been bred, ill he might so express himself, in the warmest feelings of' hope for ifidelaims oUthe Catholics ; but he would not , lend himself tlyaasist •such misrepresentations as were contained in this petition — . Be solemnly declared that had never before hervi an imputation cast upon the con duct of a Judge in Ireland.—He was ready to make every allowance for disappointed hopes ' • but he feared , the cense itself had been lunch injured by this petition. He wished that many of the friends of Ireland could appreciate fairly the language of the petitioners. lie returned thanks to ad Hon: Member for Laying persons' holding offices in Ireland were not corrupt and base., Hs considered the Petition a libel on the Magistracy and Gentry of Ireland. • Mr. ABERCROM BY said, the delegated representa tives of the Orangemen, as well as the Catholics had di , vided Ireland. 'the large body of Magistrates in Ireland were Prdtes;ants, and the persons over whorls they had jorisdiction, Catholics. Under each circumstances these, who governed were bound to watch with vigilance over the administration of justice. It was true that those who sent their Petitions had stated no particular fact ; but.they had it recorded that. in the judgment of the Pe titioners; the administration of justice was not perfect.— His Hon. Friend bad made a strong statement of facts'— Sir H. Lees had been described to be a Magistrate for the county of Monaghan. He had do right to find fault with the endeavours of that Gentleman; but it was erideot if be did till the office of Magistrate, he was ill qualified for that situation. •He might ask the Right lion. Gentlemais 'whether Sit H. Lees was not a Magistrate for the county of Loath ? Mr.GIOULBURN slid; Pn answer to the question thet he had Vartiesi to for totbrmation on the subject.; and it akeired Sir H. Lees wainikt abffigistrate for al) ) , county. • J' LTESMAN fir. AbIIRCRUIMII — " -- ir thee adverted to the eta, ale. *aim It was clear they had been told of peewee among the Magistracy of Ireland who made prit of justice. A favourable ear ought to be giv. n to complahals of sal-administration of justice. From 1807 to iffn• repeated complaints bad bfto made on that subject. As a Member of Parliament, he was bound to take care of the rights and privileges of the people. • The case was be fore the House, and the House ought to use it for the be unfit of the people. It was a case in which the King's Attorney-General addressed aletter to a Learned Judge going the circuit. One passage was, " let the tientk men be informed, that if they do not take care the Pro testants will be thrown in the back ground as they were formerly." This proved that they were haunted by that nefortunate calamity, difference of opinion. He 'thought it impossible to withhold assent to the motion. Colonel BARRY explained. Mr. R. MARTIN was convinced, that if the petitioners had sent a brief to the lion. and Learned Gentleman for his opinion oc their petition, he would have advised than not to have presented it. It was so inflammatory, so de-- void of all argument and reasoning, that the Honourable and Leatned Gentleman, in his emphatic tone, would have said to these petitioners, the House of Commons was not to be bullied. He th.ught it impossible to bare a better magistracy than at present existed in Ireland.— With regard to the charge of Judge Fletcher, that had been alluded to, he could inform the House that be bad spoken to all the other Judges on that subject, and that they had uniformly given it as their opinion, that the delivery of that charge ought to have removed Judge Pletcher from the bench, of whom it might be said, no thing became him so much as his death. • . . Mr. PRKL assured the House, that he meant to 4161 dress himself solely to the subject before it; Amalie, thought the Moose would believe- hini s whan he declared his wish so to do ; for out of the 84 days Parliament bed sat, forty -pine bad been devoted to Irish affairs. The question was, whether a Committee should be appointed to inquire into the administration of courts of justice in Ireland; a coareS that bad not been adopted for 120 years. and then the measure was applied to a case aof gross corroplioa. Although be was opposed to shat was called the claims of the Catholics, be had still too good an opinion of that body not- to disdains for them the inflammatory * . edt to say ferocious language of that petition. They would never have said the corporatime of Dublin was corrupt, and bad rubbed the country of a million of money. Many of the supporters of the Ova tholics in that •tlonte ' particularly the Hon o u ra ble' Member. forCoris(3lr. Hutchinson), had contradicted the assertions of that petition. This document, lie was quite convinced, originated with a limited number of persons under the denomination of the Catholic .I'so - now sitting in Dublin. It proceeded from the same spirit that actuated an association holding meet ings in Dublin about ten years ago, under the name of , the Catholic Committee, from which emanated a publi cation, complaining of the execution of a Catholia Fanner, who was tried at the summer assizes of Kilken ny, in the year 18W, by the name of Barry •, and of the improper respite of the sentence of Walter Hall, be cause he was eProtestant, whose case was brought be fore the House of Commons in 1812. The Right Hon. Ofttlemao then; read various extracts to prone the falla. e t yco'f these two charges, which he declared to be direct imputations against tae administration of the laws in lre kend. The late riot in the north could not be checked so soon as it would otherwise have been, for want of a ma gistrate in that past color district ; the genfletnao who was formerly ha the Commission there having been re "end), removed. In consequence of his strong political bias. The center of Lord Manners was to attend to no Conautunicatiog i s specting. the magistracy but those 4ii fro ,c.vmatkcinar or a governor of -a count -, He s sorry Ilse Learned Gentleman had de-' o at pile} ' twins tbe good. taste he had-shown is tbe• bus 0 1 1 "Cer gindirtig of his speech, by alluding to the letter of Mr. Saarbt to Lord Norbury, written twelve years since; fOr it could be legally in the possession of the public: The Honourable Gentleman eulogised Mr. Saurin, defended tthe decisions of.,the Court of Chancery in Ireland; froid labiate he said• s there had been but 22 appeals out of 2,700 causes decided by Lord Manners in 15 years, id only half of which appeals his decisions were reversed. and concluded by declaring . that he could not support the *doe, as be was satisfied the petition was pre. awned to answer the purpose of a party in Ireland. Mr. 11ROUOLIA11 said, any one who bad only beard the Mondurable Secretary's speech must suppose that he (frID Brougham) had made a statement, on making the erotism, wholly different from that which a part of his prislant audience bad done him the honour to hear. Ho thank the Honourable Member for Galway for the jocose notice he took of his. speech, which was the most aaccassful piece of mimickery he had ever witnessed, 'sada:wit congratulate the Right Honourable Secretary; who, he believed was called the manager, for haring so able a performer to close the Parliamentary season— (great laughter). l'he Honourable Secretary said, Hie .appeals from the Irish Court of Chancery were misstated on a former night. but his corrected statement proved that the proportion reversed was correctly stated. He bad also expressed his horror at making any allusion to Mr. Saurin's letter, considering the treachery by which kismet have been obtained, he said, in the climax of his indignation, and it was impossible for condemnation to got beyond it. It might have been procured by bribing 'Wants to rob their masters—aye, and their mistresses swis (exclaimed Mr. Brougham, the House resounding well cries of " Heir"). That Horne had in its possession a green bag, crammed with documents procured by such 'treachery practised against the Queen—(the cries of "hear" continued to resound). How would the Hoe. Secretary, after the feedings of horror he bad expressed at the treachery by which the nation was impaled —be lead almost said degraded in the face of the worid—how dould lie sit is council, with any two of his colleagues; who had countenanced the procuring such documents by imeans to which all common treachery Was comparatively , respectable (continued cries of " hear"). The Hon. , Gent. concluded by pressing the necessityof sending the petition to a committee. Mr. HUTCHINSON rose to explain. He was proceed ing to repeat the observations of his former spech, when he was interrupted by loud cries of " chair, chair." Time SPEAKER said, that a member was only entitled In explanation to correct any misrepresentation of his senti ments, not to repeat those which he had already uttered. The gallery was them cleared for a division, when there appeared—Ayes, 09—Noie, 19D—Majority against the mo tion, SU. The orders of the day were then disposed of, and the House adjourned at a quarter after Two o'clock. z yesterday week, ennserons end respectable meetings were held at Wakefield and Motel!, of the merchants, manufacturers,aMl othenhiaterested in the staple trade of this county and Of this country, when . resolutions were entered into at each place, strongly deprecating the pro posal of his Majesty's Ministers,to permit the free export ation of Britian Wool. At both these meetings, the po- Bey el imposing a tax on the importation of Portly' Wool was reprobated ; bat that measure, mischievous as it s s aye a uly is, was held to be preferable to the project of expOrtiog a raw material which this country alone can reduce to perfeetion, and the whole of which we have machinery and workpeople to manufacture. A meeting simi►sein its object and result to the above, was held in theNagistrates' tsoom, atHalifax, last Saturday, when an lithinapt was made to carry an amendment, to theeffect we presume, that the trade in wool should be free--nei. Um taxing tbe imports, ner•lnstraining the 'Sports, but it was neitativcd by a .large tuajori►y.-.-(•heeds Mor ei rry, due 21.) • FROM TUESDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE. . I. - •D1V1D994119. , • July 19. J. Kirkland and J. Madenook, Coventry, ribbon reenufacterers—July 19, T. Age. lIIMer-lane. Fleet street. printer—July 16, it. Flack, Sliegberd-street, Olfoed-street. (*bleat-maker—July 16, V. Iffeetlat, Hemp street, Hemp steed-road, grocer—July 19. P. Phillip, Kinestreerjlar r tholomeor-close, merchant—July 16,R. Bwandata of (Jaws borough, Liecolnshire werehant--July:lo,#. /feeders se. Tenbridge-place, St. Panora', merchant —August 9. G. Dentin, Shad-Thames, Horslydown. ligliierdiso.datV 48, A. Slater, late of Cuddingtoo, Chesbirg. corn-deo .—Jely 29. J. Jackson, Coventry, ribbon-manufacturer—Jaly IS. J. Elliott, late of Farnham, cotamen-brewer—July 99, J. Bed fok, Fen Drayton. Cembridgeshire, dealer—July 16, C r Oelverhoese, Walcot, Sumersetshirie, flour-factor. CERTIVIOETES, JuLT 15. J. Mignon, Manchester, merchant—M. 8. Hughes, Dad. leigh, Worcestershire, fronfounder—W. !Least, St. Bray. Cornwall, lime-burner. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED., B. Plant end H. Keys. Chespeide ' silitmeu-4. Holman 4 0 and W. Merlin, Btalzephon:street, Le, ukg-lin erntondsey. millwrights—J . Banton and H. Ransom., Or t Yarmouth , ' Iheen-drapers—J.' Crebb and It. Warrea, ackney-road. s.lldaara-.4. Benison. Leeds, and B. Benson, Bedford, Wool WtrdoM. and W. and J. Harris, and W. D. M•Merdo. . paper-manufacturers ..(so far as regards W. D. )—T. Chambers and T. D. Lord, Cornhill. hard- 4 A • wagensen—M. and T. C. Meadows, Prince's-street, Spital fields, dyers—W. Shorten add S. Goodwin, Birminghani, ,-I , I7 I IA‘ A 'IV.-", - ;‘., ? .' i grocers—H. Butcher and T. W. Jordan, Fichis-Mtnet, Mad. -• : • --, 4 hape-street, Whitechepel, sugar-refiners. •,„ - tk, COURT OR KING'S [IRMA, Waarwrxelfienwirall.; - ant coact e. newat. 4 This was an action by Mr. erace a irnaanfacterer of ornamental figures, against Mr. Dewar, a gentlemen of fortune, to recover damages for the injury done to the gig of the plantilf, by the unskilful tnaaagensent - of the defendant's carriage by hit coacinall. • t•"" ' '' On the part of the plaintiff four wittlialtsewene tailed, *ho stated that on the day in question, Mr. Crate was driving his gig through St. James's-street, into Picca dilly, when he was obliged to fall into a line of carriage. going in the tame direction. The defendant's car-- • Tinge was behind the gig, and hie coachman wishing t 3 obtain precedence, whipped his horses, which were ex ceedingly spirited. in order to pass • and to the act of inning, the pole of the carriage became entangled in the wheel of the chaise, dragged it tome • yards up Pic cadilly, and upset it opposite the Whit* Horse cellar. The plaintiff and a lady riding with him were thrown't . out, but did not sustain any material in)urv. Tkit,es- . - ~ pease of repairing the chaise was 71. 7s. 6ri., which 'be sought to recover. For the defendant the coachman was called, who stilt- ' ed that the gig wee behind the carriage, and Mr. Creme . attempted to pass, when the accident occurred from his own rashness. The Loon CHIEF JUSTICB left the Jury to determine on which side the weight of evidence preponderated, and . The Jury found a verdict for the Plaintiff—Ramages, . _ • 71.75. 6d. Till KING r. !SYMONDS AND ANietltlnt. . • . This was an indictment against the d'otendan's for a nuisance in working a steam-enginwlig the manucaoure of cotton, in Leman-street, Goodrastes4ieids. It was . proved that the smoke of the furnace 'greatly incommod ed the neighbours. On this nt, Mr. Common Ser geant end Mr. Brougham, fo es ants, submitted to a verdict of Guilty. W •. at . • . , //• . • ,- ' 4 6 • . . OLD BAILEY, TESTRIDAY.—R. Roe, alias Jenkins, who was remanded from the last Sessions, Was convicted of stealing in the dwelling-house of Wm. Dodovic, a fish monger. in Otford-street, the sum of 5151. in bankers' 'whet*s and gold, on the ' rld of • Derenitrif tot, ee " gonjanction with two men,"named Chandler and Strong, not in custody. BOW-STREET. —Yegterday Lord Clanmorris once moro thadeliliesppearance at this office ' in the character of 4e foulest to a complaiot preferred by two officers of this Court of Requests in Vine -street, for assaulting then? in the execution of their duty. His Lordship was brought • in a hackney-coach by Perry, one of the o ffi cers, who had. - the warrant against him, and was ushered into a private room, attended by an Irish barrister. After some discussion; and a great deal of private COl saltation between the parties, Lord Clanmorris reqnested .permission from Sir It. Birnie to settle the matter 'Tido the complainants. The permission was granted, and-at the price of five sovereigns his Lordship purchased-the ~forbearance of his prosecutors from any further pie- • maims. -4 . • • The Royal yacht is victualling at Deptford. On rd . • day a variety of articles, for the service of his Majesty; was put on board. The yacht is to be at Pertsmon.th Tuesday. but the King is not expected to go on board so moon as is generally reported. His Majesty, we are happy . to say, is enjoying now very:excellent health.---6(Kectir4o , r , Gazette.) Frae.—About half-past one o'clock yesterday enorstag,.i„, a Are broke out at an eating-house kept by Mr. Baker,ls . Cable -street, St. George's in the East. The inmates, con- ,•• , Mating of Mr. Baker, his wife, four children, and tharaer- . . sant, escaped with the utmost difficulty in a state of nudity, at the attic windows. One of the children, a box foot tetra - old, was so much injured, that it was found necessary pip take him to the hospital. and the house and furniture Imo is a short-time completely Instroyed, and two others ad. joining much damaged. ' • ' DUBLIN Coramrssrosr.-04 Monday last, James Kil bride, William Kilbride, Andrew Kilbride, and Patrick Kealy, were tried before the Commission Court, Dublin; for breaking open the house of John hi'Keon, in the parish of Seggard, and assaulting with Intent to Mdr der him. James Kilbride was further icidiattd for having committed a rape on the body or Hannah M'Keon ; and the other prisoners, William Kilbride; Andrew Kilbride, and 'Patrick Kealy, were indicted for being present, aiding, and assisting James Kilbride 'in; committing a rape on the body of Hannah 111'Keoa.• After the evidence of John and Hannah Kirin hceta heard, with that of Gerald Flanagan, a Police Offiti•r„; who took all the prisoners into custody, five witnesses were called in behalf of Kealy, four of whom swore he he was with them at a wake, in a distant place, at XI'S time the crimes were committed. Several witnesses were also called to support an alibi on the part of the other prisoners ; and. the Jury, who retired for about tbree quarters of an hear, returned with a verdict of Not Guity in each case and is each count in the Indictments. In the course of the trial, Catherine Dunn, On old woman), was examined by Mr. O'Connell; she Stated, that she was at the wake; that she saw Neely there ; that he went away before her; that she stayed- there all night, and that she called him up between three and four o'clock in the ipruing, in consequence of wcrier of his having calve he was cross-entrained kt '3lr. Miami at . some felfres:l; nothing folder's' lees ;hated, Ind she tenninated the cross-examination very abr4tly.• by saying, " that she would take Mt more oaths ; fur " what should she ? her brad Wood, and she -swap very "dry, and she would stop there no longer." Shni e dimen hustled rl ff the table, bat turned round as imhewiegling, and said to Mr. *Kane, that she wished he wunlill t kive her the price oY a dram. The Warder of Saturday contains a loitg.talinurid Exhortation to the Orangemen against dreaming the sta tue 12th July.—(Dublin Paper.) Ettaavux.—ln the Report of the case, Martell v. Beaumont, in yesterday's STaratimare.the defendant, ra by mistake, inserted fur p/oissii/j; with reference to th . 's cireunsstance of the plaiotill's having Ilen the benefit atilt fesolveht Act two rears agb. The mistake iy however, obvious from the context. . _ .~:: _ .; ott ........- 40. 1 r----.. -.4 . ...- i . 0. '1411 r4 . ' p~ . ~ s ... .; .:..~:. „ - - • I, I