The Statesman. — London, England, 1823-11-08 00:00:00

Olk* 1 ..._... During - thie 'Perim'. alan. : l l4 hperiateeti Mtiel hes 'wen continitally in- regrees at New Lanark, has been freely opened to the moetaninute ieepectinn of the pablie. Full liberty hat boom giveo to the,rieh and poor, to natives, and to Neel( neis. 'to come and see, and Al e e l; , by the evideneteaarthele Own senoras' for no BMW bee : n pot to he bomber 'Of daftt or Weeks dnii n g which 'strangers mirht examiee the establishment , whether their nljeet Was to diwover its defects, or to ascertain its value, for Ovate or p ittlie ex ample. ii .. . To the proseention of the novel and laiptentrateder. taking, in which I have etaltarkell, thirty y .'. day life res have been devoted, and the kerne. wh ch has 'been loomed, cannot be mile onelitated t bail . has exceeded a large independent' fortone far any - petite family. I Irene however to this etnenditnre not only without the slightest regret, but with Pelisse, of reedier satisfaction. • By many I have heed deemed I ristonarf and a madman. Red) l'aVe long been aecastorned to see, in print, every kiad of epithet applied to my under eking. All this, however, and much more.. I was prepared for, from the commencement. I had from the first, counted the possible sacrifice which might he'reqnlred;and,consideriog the onlimited extent of good to In. obtained for the present tad al! roonre generations, tharacter, fortune, and life. seemed hot as duet in the balance, and not deserving of on.; moment's consideration. flit I can truly say that instes4 of meeting with the obstacles and dillienlties I lied anticipated, my progress, I , SO been one of pleasure and high gratification.. Ile faet is, Plat the troth of the new system, and the prettiest, be t te6.9 it is ealenleted to confer •npnn mankind, are sea; • that thee incline the great majority either to support measure. for its introduction, or to be' neutral; • sure prornmoic that the time is rpt distant. when all will feel conetotined to rive it their fall and hearty assistance. It .ill be necessary that I' should enter Into a mere pSrimilir eyelike stion of the experiments at New Lanark. 1 pumase therefore to resume this part of tbe subject in my next. EVIIIRT Owes. New Lanark, 23d Oct. 1823. • •MIMIMIIMINIIIII COURT OF KING'S BENCH.—Fotoev. - DISTURBING AN AN ASSF.II BLY OF ROOKS. ALLAN V. soccer. This was an action of trespass against the defendant] for breskinr and entering the plaintiff's close, and shooting i his rooks, The rave h a s b e en tried at the last .Assises for Mairlonne. when a verdict was found for the plaintiff. Mr. ROLLAND now moved to set aside this verdict. and enter a :longish for the plaintiff upon the ground , that he had not at the trial proved, and could not prove, any pro. perty in the birds in question. The declaration in the case, the reading of which convulsed the Court with laughter, was in two counts. The first charm!" that the plaintiff was lawfully possessed of a certain close of land in the parish of St. Peter the Apostle. in the Isle of linnet. with certain trees growing thereupon. That to the', remain tree.. a great number of rooks were need to come amt breed. and rear their young, by Which the said plaintiff 'was enabled to take away the Triune took, and bring them to mat ket to his profit, use, viol advantage. The defendant, not regarding she premise., did enter, kill, end drive away certain of the said rook., and by firing a certain run, Amer.,' with gunpowder, and by the smell of the said gunpowder. prevent, frighten, and drive away one ' thoti-an I otlo r rooks front coming near the plaintiffs boll+, to,the great detriment which he suffered from the loss of the point rook', and their eggs, and the loss of that' pleasure anal delight which their neighbourhood afforded to him, the said plaintiff end his friends." The mond enfant confined itself to the loss of the delight .. which the plaintiff derived from the society of the rooks." To prove the property. a witness was called at the trial, who deposed that the plaintiff had been in the habit of selling the rooks' eggs as plovers' eggs in the London market, and the young rooks to make pigeon pies.—(Langliter.) The Learned Counsel contended that this did not prove property in the rooks. as they were sold not as rooks hot pigeons. If this doctrine were carried to any extent, it would make a man answerable for shooting a crow which came prowling about his grounds. Mr. flunocv, who was on the other side, contended that the evidence proved the birds were sold as rooks, not as yreorts. Mr. Justice BAYLEY inquired whether it was shown that the plaintiff" had any interest in the young rooks before they' left their nests. Mr. BOLLIND replied that theta was no evidence of that fact. He added, that there was no allegation that the rooks had been shot milicionsiv. Mr. Justice BAYLEY observed that that was summer ra-y, 114 the quo amino was a question for the Jury at the trial. Mr. HOLLAND contended that this case was different from • trespass committed upon the decoys of a plaintiff, for these were• put up at generally at a great expense. By law, a man could not shoot within a mile of decoys. Mr. Justice IlavIAT observed that thine was no allegation that the rooks had been taken away before they werecapable of living, which was • material omission in the statement of his property in the rooks. The COURT, under all these circumstances, granted a rule ./Visi. WA' expressed a wish that the case might be put iato a special'skape, and set down for argument. SIR HUDSON LOWE AND BARRY O'MEARA, ESQ. TIIR KING V. O'MARA. This case being called on, which was • motion for a cri minal imfot °Winn against Mr. O'Meara, for an alleged libel in a wok, called " A Voice from St. Helena," and which stood over from last term. • Mr. C. PHILLIPS (With whom were Mr. PATTESON and Mr. WessTWORTI? •I.llearr.d for Mr. O'Meara, and said. that his client had yie dell to the suggestions of his Counsel, as t a C..e inexpediency of entering into the matters contained lu the numerous affidavits which had been tiled in answer to the rule Nisi obtained by the prosecutot. Mr. O'dleara's Counsel had taken upon themselves the responsibility of this advice inasmuch as Sir Hudson Lowe's Counsel had with. drawn from the proceeding, and proposed that the rule shool.i.be discharged. It being agreed therefore, on all hands, that the rule should be discharged, thequestion now was, whether it should la• discharged with or without costs? Tile Learned Counsel zealously contended that it should be discharged with ales. to be taxed by the Master of the Crown Office, considering the circumstances under which Cue case had been presented to the notice of the Court. It %could he recullected that two Terms had elapsed, and ten I:rand Jules had sat, before Sir Hr. 'sou Lowe ventured to make any cumplaint of injury to his character. The Conn, whets the role was moved for, very naturally inquired it liether there was any precedent far erantino information Where the prosecutor bad so long slumbered over his sup. j:osed injuries? Tile Solicitor General replied, that he hnew of n one, but took the rule on condition that he should urorluee some authority far such RA application.-1( was will .rstoo I tts ,t the Le.atied Stancher was to twArcli for Precedents. aro', if he fo•tad none. that the [idle was not to he drawn up. 1;n•, nutuitlistending this condi iou, which It Id not dc.-ti p.trfortoul. the Ital. us. Ivry .41 upon O'Meara, titerehy i 11l ;rasing upon hint the nacessity of that cumin ms esprit le which he hal incurred in procurine ta, in an Arts , t rr to the charge of libel. Cordident el% Mr. o'.olears'a Cue to.el were in the validity of the oljectio.l a 4 to the lateness of the application to the Coon, rid they owed a duty to Ore Court, in requiring . their client to pre pore adi lavi:s to meet the Kale upon the merits. Under t'se4e circumstances, Nero urp*.l, us .the Prosecteor's Counsel had herti, of the ne.:essi , y of prod !clog some porcerlent, and cousiJering the enormons es rretwo shu•h Mr. O'lleAra hot been °Wiled t.t itterte, he trusted that the Coin, .toil) cAnsider his dieat as entitled at kart to some portion of those costs, to whidls'hit i lfatrbtais so anneeesaa.' rile put. Mr. PITTESON and Mr. WeNTWORTII fOllOllll6l on the same side. SouCETOR Ostscaal. said, the understanding lasi Term decidedly was, that his Learned Friends alsould Make their election betWeeti catering upon the merit, and allowing the rule to he 'discharged without costs, according to the udual practice Of the Court. • He begged to call their Lordships' attention to the nature of the case. It was true the original publication containing the libel had taken plice long before his application to the Court ; bat their Lordships would take into consideration the repetition of the libel. The libel was published in November, and • It's application to the Court was made in the following: Term, so that even in the case of Magistrates be was fully in time. He admitted that nothing had been selected for prosecu tion In the last, which had not appeared in the original publication ; but a person situated as Sir 11. Lowe was, Might pot at first have been aware of the extent to which the libel was likely to circulate; he might not have thought it worth taking notice of ; but when he found it repeated over sod over again —when be saw it copied into all the qewspapers, and made the subject of general conver sation, he felt it big duty to apply to that Court for re gress. Mr. Justice Beer asked if the complainant's affidavit eon. Weed statements to that effect ? Mr. PHILLIPS : Not one word, my Lord. The work in question bad gone through four editions before Mr. Solicitor Ueneral made his application to your Lord ships. The Somme OZNERAL : So, then. my client is to be libelled in four successive publications, and the repetition of the offence is to be pleaded as an excuse. Mr. PHILLIPS: My Lords. Sir Hudson Lowe does not in his affidavit pretend to assert that the fourth ?intim' con tained one word. which was not to be found In the first.— They complain of a work published on the 6th of Novem ber, at which period they mast have been aware of its exist ence, and vet they made no application to your Lordships until the Hilary Terns following. The SOLICITOR-01111E2AL repeated, that his application was made in the term following that in which the publica- tion took place, so that even in the case of a filagistra'e he was perfectly in time. His Learned Friend stated that the Court had made &certain stipulation when he male his motion. He was not aware of any stipulation having been made. Their Lordships asked him if he could direct their attention to any case, as a precedent? To which ha replied that he was not then aware of any such case, lie had heen asked if he knew of any similar application made at a period so distant from the commission ut the offence? To which he answered, that he knew of no line drawn (save in the ease of magistrates). but understood it to be entirely at the disrretion of the Court. lie believed that in the ease of the libel against the late Empress Catherine, the application was made more than two terms After the publication. Mr. Justice BIITLIT observed, that that might hare been a very different case, an Ambassador might have to await instructions from his Coon. Here the complaint was of injury to character; in such a ease the Court would expect the complainant to be so far alive to his own character as to apply promptly. The Souctron-OerreaaL said. the rule had been enlarged at the request of his Learned Friends. $1 r. PurLLtrs said, the role was enlarged by consent in Easter Term, and at that tithe the Solicitor-General knew that he had Le precedents, and ought not to have put them to the expense of sending to France tor witne.ses. Mr. SCARLICTT followed JO the same side with the Soli citor-tieneral. Mr. PHILLIPS said, be was ready to give up the costs, if Sir Hudson Lowe woad swear he had not read every word of the first edition of the work In question (a laugh.] The Cain Jorrica said, it was the practice of the Court, where a rule was discharged upon a preliminary objection, not to allow costs, and be saw nothing in the present case to induce them to depart from that rule— Rule discharged without costs. The Court rose at half past three o'clock. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS.-FRIDAY. &tan:TS in Bunco. ZDKARDS V. DILL •ND OTHERS. This was as action brought by the Ker. G. Edwards, minister of a dissenting chapel at Great Marlow, against Charles Bell and others, the printer and proprietors of The Times newspaper, for a libel, by having published a -certehrparittiph, cliirgiog Lint with having made his pulpit the vehicle for female slander, in pnblicv attacking the character of a virtuous young la•ly, a member of his congregation. The paragraph was copied from a country paper (the Bucks Chronicle.) The case was tried at the sittings after last Trinity term,before Mr.Jostice Burough. The defendants Pleaded the general issue, and also entered a special plea of justification—via., that he (the plaintiff), from a certain part or station in the said chapel, then and there usually assigned to him the said plaintiff, for preach ingor delivering the sermon or discourse, did utter and publish of Miss Fair, a young lady of spotless reputation, a personal invective in words to the following effect —" I have something to say which I have thought of mentioning for some time, namely, the improper conduct of one of the female teachers ; her name is Miss Fair. Her conduct is a bad example and disgrace to the school ; and if any of the children dare ask her to go home, she shall be turned out of the school, and never enter it again. Miss Fair does more harm than good." The case went to the Jury upon these Issues, and they bond a verdict for the defendants on the plea of justification, and for the plaintiff on the general issue—Damages, 40s. Mr. Sergeant PIM!. this day moved for a role to show cause why the verdict should not be entered for the plaintiff on both pleas, notwithstanding the finding of the Jury on the plea of justification. Ile grounded his motion on two points—the first, that the words in the jnstilic ,tion, 44 from a certain place usually assigned," Sic., did not suf ficiently designate the" pulpit." from which it was sail in the libel the words were delivered. He contended that the words used did not necessarily imply the pulpit, and therefore that the pleas was erroneous.. Mr. Justice Peatc.—" Head the words of the justifica tion." Mr Sergeant PELL then read the words. Mr. Justice Buttammtt.—l had some doubt e the time of the trial whether the words of the plea solficiently de signated the " pulpit," but I directed the Jury to find for the defendant on the jostilieation, and that the plaintiff should have the advant tie of the opinion of the Court upon the point after, if be pleased. Mr. Justice l'a Mi.—Suppose, brother Pell, I sly to you, " I heard a very excellent uiscourse on Sunday last from a reverend friend of yours, delivered front the place usually assigned to him fur preaching," would you cot understand bytt that he spoi•e from tire pulpit ? Mr. Sergeat.t I apprehend this ease is diffriam hero. It I am t.. 111 ttr .t a into has used gross Logrua LT ~g ai u it me 1..n,1 Isle pulpit. and on int; Pry I find that it was .ti.ut from a pew, the cow would be te' dilrerent. 'foe le tri.ed Sergeant then %veld on with Ilia second pniut, t•.;:t tie ward; of the jastilicati evsn if they were proved, were nut a rutlicient d..feuce tor the action. 17 1 on this stib . ;eet the le mica Judge who tried the ease had some iluitias Mr. .11. BIYRNOI.IIIII.-1 SAW no objectign to the evi• donee wit a I mention. 1 bail nu doubt that the para. graph w+a libel, au l l to:d the Jury to lied fur the plaintiff un die erne' ul Mr. 4t.reca4t unilerstoosl your Lords Lip at the trial to ex I rem% a dunk of tit.. jotd ticAtion. Air. J ;Lee Pt:art...vow —Ye.; hit that wits as to whethir the words of the iskt were a ' , Ali: v. 4 Jtxiou..tiaa of th• .. pulpit." Tile.. - frATksius Al *3 limilicatiot Secgonnt PILL.—Theo. my Lord, l' shall wish the second {mints and 1 tnebstain that the lends was wholly insufficient to meet the action. . Mr. Justice Naito—Your• that point is not tenable. toORD CrnlP duarice.—l;4hink the words "the pla. usually assigned, &c." designate the pulpit clearly enoegh. Mr. Sergeant PeLL.—Theo, my Lords, I shall take the rule on the second point. ' Mr. Justice lionnouon.—Yes: on the badness of the plea. . • . Mr. Sergeant. Pes.t..-I-1 wish to put it to the Court,. whether it ought not to he a part of the rule that a neer trial ought to be granted, on the ground that the verdict es tl e special plea was contrary to evidence, as I submit the evidence did not go fully to supl:ort that plea. Not two of the witnes.es gave the same account of the words said to hare been used by the plaintiff. Mr. Justice BURROUOII.—.AII that was pat to the jury, and they decided upon it. You cannot now make it part of the rule. The rule was then granted on the second point only. stems:vet. v. ELLIS AND VIAL. Mr. lluxcutssox opened the pleadings, anti Mr. Serf. Vatton AN stated the care. This was au action brought by the plaintiff agaiost the defendants, whom he bad formerly employed ashis attorneys, to recover compensation from them for the injury he had received on account of their neglirsore. '1 he plaintiff had leased a freehold house to a pertly!' named Cbettle, upon a repairing lease. The cove flints in this lease had been broken by the tenant, and the plaintiff commenced an ejectment against him, which was to have been tried in ISIS, amine being called Gator trial, was referred to Mr. Wigg, a very skilful and eminent surveyor. The attorneys who acted for (Mettle called on the arbitrator, and did everything in their.power to enable him to proceed with the case, which, however, he was prevented from doing by the present defendants takingly* steps whatever on the part of their client. The consequence of this conduct was, that the time appointed for the arbi• tration, otter having been once enlarged, expired, and the plaintiff was obliged to sell the house at great disadvantage. Mr. %Vigg, and Thomas Meredith, a servant of the plain• tiff's proved the detests and negligence on the part of the defendants. Other witnesses proved the injury the house had sustained on account of the delay in enforcing the covenants for repair.—and that the price obtained fir the premises on that account was 1501. less than would have been given, had they been in a proper state of repair.—Mr. Sergeant OrtsLow and Mr. Sergeant Lawn, for the defendants, submitted that the plaintiff must be nonsuitesl, because he bad net produced the lease to Chettle, which was mentioned in the pleadings, and on which the plaintiff's title in the original action was founded.-31r. Sergeant Vatnntax contended that the present case was not on the vajitlity of the cause of action' between the plaintiff and Chortle, but on the question of the negligent. charged against she defendants.—The CHI sr Joiner; thought the defendant. had better proceed with the cause. lie said this, because he should wish to I reserve his observations to another stage of the trial. lion ever, he could not but think it very strange that the de fendants had commenced an action on the covenants of a lease—bail referred that action—had proceeded throughout on that lease, and had finally delivered in a bill, in which it had been recogniA, and yet they now required proof of its existence. Mr. Sergeant Oast.ow then addresqed the Jury for the defendimq. and said that the object of the plaintiff in the former action had been not to obtain damages fur non repair but to get lid of the lease he had granted. As to the charge of negligence, be should prove that the plaintiff bad hint. self directed the defendants to stop the cause, and that the delay. bed originated with him. Several ',lineages Wrr• called to make out this gatemen', but they all admitted, on trots examination, that the plailitaf had bora very urgent with the defendants to carry on his clause to a termination, and that he only wavered in his opinion when the defend. ants informed him, after the time for the arbltratioe had ex pired, that he could be defeat.' if he proceeded farther. but that he might commence a fresh ejectment. I%lr. Sergeant VAL;GUAN replied, and the Casey JUSTICE charged the Jury, who returned a verdict for the pla . .ntilf— Damages. 1604 PONCE. --tam,. M AMON Horne—Tut POTAIS Eattonaxte.—Yester day Mr. Prince, a Common Councilman, waited upon the Loan Maros, and begged leave to announce to his Lord ship publicly, that the appeal made under his saaction to the public benevolence in aid of the survivors of the un fortunate emigrants to Poyais, bad been completely successful. Mr. Sheriff Laurie and several other respect. able individuals had given their aid to the sufferers. One gentleman, who signed himself "Live. Let live, to bre," bad sent M., and the whole sum subscribed was lUll. This sum had been found tally sufficient to relieve the destitute condition of the emigrants, and the orphans, as far as aid by public subscription was asked. The number of the survivors who arrived in London, when the subscrip. Lion was opened, was eighteen, and of these ten were children, seven of whom were orphans. All had been sent home, excepting the three orphans of a man named Chalmers, that were too ill to be removed, and for whom it was hoped an asylum would be procured in town. Passages had been kindly provided by the Scottish Corporation, for all the emigrants that bad returned home to `Scotland; and besides the relief given them whilst in London, 51. each had been given them from the subscription on their I departure. it would be satisfactory to the public to learn that they had arrived home; and he had the satisfaction of handing to his Lordship a letter from the poor men. ' The Lotto MAYOR read the letter, which was signed by four of the survivors in '..ehalf of their brethren. It is expressed, in simple, strong . terms, their thanks for the benevolent exertions made oy his Lordship and other gentlemen in their behalf. Mr. Prince stated, that the three orphan male children alluded to as labouring .ender the disorder brought on by the climate, remained under the care of a person residing at No. 3, Norfolk Street, Blackwall, and as no relations bad been found, it was hoped that admission would be gained for them to the Military Orphan Asylum, as their father was a pensioned soldier. A lady of rank, we under stood Mr. Prince to intimate, had some idea of adopting the youngest of the orphans, should its health recover. Mr. Prince expressed his pleasure at being able thus to conclude and give up the case of the poor emigrants as far as l►e was concerned, fur be believed he could be of no further service to them. The Lonr Mavon congratulated Mr. Prince on the statement, and he said did not doubt th4t it would go forth for the satisfaction of the public. HATTON GA 'MEN —JUVEN ILZ HORSZ STZALERS.--NCS. tertlay Williams Fairchild and Peter Dryasdalc, two buys, the one ten and the other twelve years old, were brottghl to this OMCd by Reed and Lee, on a charge of horse. stealing. It appears that they called on Tue•day last upon a person of the name of IVliite..a horee knocker (or dealer in the skins and flesh of horses), residing in Cow Cross, offering to s• II hills a hor-e, which they had with thew, and for which they asked Suspecting something amiss. lie slopped the horse, and gave information of the circumstance at this Office, which led to the apprehension of these youthful delihquebts. On being brought this Offioe, the younger confessed that they lied, aided by another hoy not yet apprehended, 'Late° the horse out of a field on Vauxhall COMMON b • loafing to Mr. Rhodes. hey,ilere reuxaadeil, to give time to inquire out the 1 1 owner of the horse. Yount aerie prisanersare, they arest4teti he hardened :ffenderF, and :wrt•r en►y recently been dilchargel from ' the Hems of Correction. where they had been confined ou bf iteidiuf a donkey. • o#latttaeeooou Svatev.—Mr. J. Taylor, a nerilema n /staled to be of considerable fortune, attended yesterday, at this Mier, is pot' id bail to a bill of indictment tined evilest him as the snpposed proprietor of a noted gimlet house in Pall Mall. Mr. Taylor, who came forward voluntarily to meet the indictment was accompanied by his solicitor, who wished to have the bail accepted and entered into without the necessity of mentioning Mr. . Taylor's name publicly in the Office ; but Ma. CONANT, the sitting Magistrate, would not permit this, and inquired of the defendant himself what his name was, and where the house was situated for which he was indicted : t o these questions Mr. Taylor replied, after much hesitation and reluctance, and said that the house was No. 58, P a ll Mall, but stinted the Magistrate that he had no more wennetion with the house than MR. Cowart? himself had, Ma. CONANT said this was the question to be decided at the Sessions, and the bail, who were a respectable botcher in . Church Passage, Piccadilly, and a plumber and glazier in York Street, St. James's, were then accepted itt the sum of 401. each. QUIRK SQUARIL—DARING BURGLART.—Yestexday is. formation was received at this office, the, on the night o f Monday, or early on Tuesday morning, the house of Mr, k Theruton, jeweller, in Dean Street, Soho, was borglari. ously entered by mesas of a crow bar, which forced the kitchen door, and robbed of jewellery of every description to the amount of 1001. with which the robbers got clear Off. ROBAIRT or Ti °MCC—Charles Cartwright, Joh* Roberts, and :William Barites, who stood remanded upon suspicion of robbing the Office of the Gas Company in the Horse-ferrproad, underwent another examination. Several of the Dentlessen belonging to the Company complained of the erroneous accounts lot this robbery. Amongst other inaccuracies, it was said that the sum o f 10001. had been boleti; when is fact the loss did not ex. coed 301, and so greet a SUM is never left at the office. Nothing bad been broken except a writing desk. Tartlet and Roberts were remanded, but Cartwright was discharged. Woasusr Silvey, Jan. a baker in White Cross Street, yesterday appeared befare Mr. BENNET. the Sitting Magistrate, to answer as drams served upen him by William Liam'''. of N 0.22, Ross Street, St. Luke's, glass cutter, for selling him on the Frid a y before a loaf of bread under the denomination of 21b. breai, without weighing the same as requited byact of parliament. —Clancy appeared in the witness box, when the 31agls trate, inquired " What has this informer to say?" Chewy answered Le was no Informer, but a hard working loam with a large family—that he dealt with Mr. Silvey for nearly three months, and had suspected his bread to be light—that he communicated his suspicions to his shop. mate., who recommended him to take the steps he did; and in consequence be went and bought a 41b. loaf. which wanted 3 ounces of is weight; that be afterwards went and bought a loaf from Mrs. Silvey. who charged bim 31d. for it, upon which he immediately went into a cheese shop newly opposite and bad it weighted, when it turned out to be one ounce and a half light, fur which offeete be ob tained the present summons. Mr. Silvey denied ever haring sold a loaf of bread nailer the present Act without first weighing it. The Blame then refereed to the clause in the Act, where the baker is compelled to weigh the bread la the presence of the purchaser whether requested to do s or not ; and for such neglect fined him 10s. with costs. Clancy received fie. for costs, and se. fur his share of the penalty. ISHlTH.—Friday morning. the 7th lord., at his haul* la York place. the wife of J. Home. 211.1CP. of a otang4tor. MAAR, l'hotroda?. at St. George**, Itaiwereogatro. W. Has wan. ltwt. t-. Harriet Horgan. of Mount Clare in th• County of Sarre*. CD.-02 Ww6tt Instaatott Itausawroadth, in her .I.4th year. Mail an 'thank w.la of /.ha Crow.lar, Yp. Akt:nuao of VA ward of Farringdow. Wilkie. ..Us last at his hanse.:New.llt4se..artgaten.X. Dyke. Esq. late ef On V the Rhllastaat, wife of f oe Betts, Z. of Great Rageell- street, O a l le it ir the lastest. at be reefitegse• In Great Reseell.mmet. ltre. Ann Mieshirik 'Mow of the tate Caleb Bhmehard. its+ oserehmt. Os Satstedial. tat Instant. at her home. Stapleton-grove. sear Bristol, Mac Caelle.redlA a the lateld. Castle. Eq. Nov. n, at Weymouth. Colonel Chichester, of Arlington Court. Is the County of Devon. At croakily. um Horollwortb. eigel 1M yam Lod eight soothe. Me nu Parry ; be walked to Kersllvrorth as I back (diatoms is. wile) every day till within a few months of his death, and retained. his mental fatuities to the list. On the lid Wt. at Hertford. aged Mk Benjamin Rewire. Seq. who Elea I the uldee of Clerk of the Peace for the Couoty of Hertford. II yews. __Dense et places: wror.--Tioa. Tby house, sad (in the cup of life, Thzt bogey-drop) thy pleasing wife. S'RATES, by his Discourse on Marriage, so es. raptured his auditors with the subject, that the married men dew to their wives, and the bachelors hasteasd to be wedded; and "The Npettator" has agitated, that the word '• wife" Is the mestagreeable sucldellghtful newels Retire. The sacred Institution, thee, Ot marriage, compasses the desideratum of our enjoyment; teeming not only with hap rises' on earth, but disposing the soul itself to harmonize with bliss hereafter. Previous, however, to entering into this hallowed obli gation, it becomes an imperative duty, not only to regulate the passions, but to cleanse the grosser nature from those impurities which the freedom of unrestricted pleasere may have entailed upon it. To the neglect of such attention ars attributable, many of those hapless instances, which, while they excite the commiseration of the beholder, should also impress him with the fear of self-reproach. Usurious habit, will effeminixe the body—a resideneela the tropics will relax the elastic fibre—bat more especially does the premature infatuation of youth too frequently com promise the natural dignity into a state of inanition, from whence the egonixed 'offerer more than doubts the chance of relief. To all such, then, we address ourselves, offering hope--energy—museelar strength—felicity : nor will oar &dunces appear questionable, 'auctioned as they are by the multiplied proofs of twenty years successful experience. The easy cares of married life are sometimes disturbed by the suspension of those bleedings which concentrate the nuptial wreath—for the female babit is often constitutionally weak—yet it can be strengthened, and deficient energy im proved Into functional power. la every case of syphilitic Intrusion, as well as In every relaistion, of the generative economy, we pledge our abiSty to cure speedily and with effect. Earnestly solicitous to expel the unfeeling empiric from the position so presumpte only taken up, we deviate from general principles with less hesitation; and confident in our own honourable late grity as Members of the College of Surgeons, we refer the suffering community of either tiex (especially those enter ing into matrimonial life) at once to our houses, where daily attendance is given for personal consultation ; and letters from the country are immediately answered; these 0511 contain a remittance for Advice and Medicine, ollicit can ha forwarded to any part of the world, however d.stant. GOSS stud Co. M.R.C. Surgeons. No. 11, Bouverie-street. Fleet-street, tondo*. Just Published (Sixteenth Edition), I. Titic .}mu or Lies, a familiar Commenutary on the above Diseases.—ii. tiv ULNA. addressed exclusively to the Female Sex.--M'l be had at 9u, Paternoster-row ; b 9, Pall Mall ; lli. Princes street, Soho ; 171, Fleet-street. Loudon : Porter, 72, Grafton tret t, Dublin; Jones, 117, Trongate, Glasgow; and of all Bookqellera. price A. DR. KA DY respectfully calls the attention of those afflicted, to his peculiar and effectual method of cure, and althouolt he will not presume to pledge infallibility In every description of case, yet as far as human aid, assist ed by medical and surgical experience can be appied, promises a speedy and permanent res t o ration.--Dr. E. is consult- 11 daily at No. Dean-streer, Soho, end I, Hatfiel -I cert. Stamfoc.-street, Blackfriars cud Waterloo-roads, by patients of both sexes Country letters, (post paid) en closing n fee, meet respectable attention by return of second yell—Upper Ground street,Surrey side of Blackfriars Bridge, leads directly to I. Hatfield street —.mew London r Printed and Published at the ORLON No. lir, by R. WARDELL ; LL.Q. Proprietor. weir _ _ ... ' rA NTITI I I `4•IIMMINN JOTI coati. 4AMAP.* 'JAW FOLIO!_._, umkr•e That the aext : that 5,..1 , 11.e." •f Notreatb4 sIOY. Proposals Isoa, wetted to known pc ,tentit fu rOri0111111111! UZI a ;wink., .would it so should be s Contraot au tiauloil I. h. Partieuta Tom hetwo P. S. IN twat Olt A P D is the Ei the purr •ESTABI TUTF, Mechanic quested. The Cl No. 24, F DAT stet only of t opposite: -at is. pet neatly fa 031. ad. Y Moulds f IQs. per e Olt, 4e. 1 Windsor sor. Is. 9 Orders god rep( Adieoe , a; gags, Uri 1tt:614. Spa ANTIIIII. Medkitw • It it 4 tn.:4 e *luring Mel anti vitiate eatettat tor artier., all st•tmat4, a Aoid in • Ciirap*ide, Wa:erL.• ilalioine V Just lava, a GEIA be had I street, street, 1 Bookse D' cure, al in eves ed by promise consult Street, patient closing post.— leads d 1 PI and lac effectus of a ce malign: 'Human time, in oath Spark c are sot don; b the Di that if I • IT: !--~;'