The Statesman. — London, England, 1819-07-05 00:00:00

eke, limed say vilivilme thz nett asebt Aortal, lOW degree of intimacy takes place between them. This was the lelier : " What will yea Mink of me. my dewed Miry ? Tim! Idschherult ia this alike did am glee are your Truro till Mil lastrai ire - all credit I. dne to you Ise tour OWPI lent coopi•RueP - and I hall not forget Mrs. !Math ;the feumed soar by which lb!, L.. 1, own ud rived) ? Sal whet did you tappose. apart -reit tlndiug it !ewer foe that Ley yes must surely. 1 liar. Twee err:owed before ibis ; bat I hope you did aril make sey sadist el fleetirdar. I did sot, it is true, smite here limn the city yesterday till all the clerks sem gime. bat they should tart. WI my letter with the servant. tepid:owe of your pleat it will do yery well foes hide I bat our best polity will be he alrirge lima time le lime. as curiosity all, mad Ibex warpleicus, dud !.ly detersios, the mutual oilipriog of these two, may fol!no rnrh caber. If time is allowed for it. The elfeamOOderli by shirt dime may he melted. you will easily &berme ha bre, lA, sour appearsore (by aio memos earittractive), which wisehl lend the worthies at the Pastrokke io Mink you mod haves, house ..f seer own s Me fretmetury of your applications! would. op doubt. istlyee them to sailluure your lettere to pow der some peculiar Werra foe yea I and idly, the mammal the plan to your owe boom smold aford great facility in their attempts to discover the mystery. should their currisity be saukesed. MI Mae. bowever, are but pem.bilities. ageism which, yes !sow, ill my piss always is be as guard. • [From this It will ha seen link the Defendant, if young In years, was well advsnrel In artillesi.i " Amd this w ill s erve all the porpores of a emmeyasee foe our comeiroodesee till lem able in Ix apes a hater. This shall astleairoor to do at a greater distance from Irme. bet rot so great as M bf ineastealeat to you-and where, if posaillky sit re are no interfering sasiliaguild or young wows. laborer. to sly are wonderful useavellen of secrets, when they cisme to "'wain a elite. Yoe will by she time you have yrs Iles far, say. or ihiak. a truer to paid/wile, coarideratimar-love hie; sorbing to do with sorb. I acknowledge it, astl - ilesios, only recornmesdiog la you dirermitio If.d I. year premise. sis you say yes do is mete 1 forget all 1 wished witty ohm see you. aid gibes 1 lave parted they all crowd upon my me mory at awe. I lava Warne maimed to 'hash you far year Utile perms.. is every mow m gratifying to me. nod as de writing of estimation as its ..s• act out. You will, however, am sure, Is. litre me. sites 1 my It peonies, la my eyes. charms far superior is its owe Miriade se--whi.b yes sal., la thew arid, eta appreciate. I hope Ibis will reset you is safety. I have met with at least • obsessed imerroption dace 1 began ibis, and that saw forced tamed abruptly. • Saturday. Y.ers, eves. D. I." lie should proceed to call witnesses to establish the fact: Thomas Putney, parish clerk of St. George the Martyr, prodoced the registry of the marriage of the Plaintiff with his wife. on the 43d of Now. 1811, then being Miss Mary Ann Peek.. Mr. Lewis Peacock, attorney, and brother of the Plaintiff, proved the hind-writing of the Plaintiff sod Ms wife to the marriage registry. Mrs Peacock was the daughter of Sir Henry Peak.. The Plaintiff and his wife lived together on terms of affection, as far as witness ever observed. They lived together until September last, when they separated. Fanny White lived servant with Plaintiff and his wife, four years, nest September. They had two children, • bey and a girl. As far as she observed, Mr. and Mrs. Pesc‘ck lilted happily together. Wit ness chd not observe mach when her mistress went 00i. Never noticed any difference in the conduct , of Mrs. Peacock towards her husband from what it was when witness' first went there. Mrs. Peacock used sometimes to walk in the morning, at tiers with her little girl, and at times •ithoat. Geld not say whether she went out eftesier latterly than beret,. Remembered Plaintiff and his wife going to France last year with Sir Henry and [Jody Peak.. After returning from France, Mrs. Peacock did not go out oat oftener than usual. Sometimes the Plain tiff went out of en Evening, and returned at ten o'clock. Remembered the diipute between Mrs. Pea cock and her husband in September last. Witness was weakened by the disturbance, and went op stair., anti SS* her mistress standing on the lauding place! studiessed. Did not know what the dispute was about. Iler mistress left the house nest day, and never returned again. Witness could not swear to the Defendant, hut might have seen him. Fliztheth Williams was nurse in the Plaintiff's family a few days before Mrs. Peacock left her house. In t'.e cows, of a night in September last, was dis t,. ihrd by a noise in her master's bed-room. Went sip steiro sod saw her mistress undressed. Saw no paper ; only heard a noise. There was no light, bet the Piaintiff called for one, which was brought by witness's fellow.sorvant. Mrs. Peacock blew the light out. Mr. ADAM ellieeled, that say thing done by Mrs. Petcock, was net evidence receivable in this cause. The CHIEF hist= said, it was receivable IS evi dence of the wooer in which the letter allotted to was obtained by the husband. Sarah Jenkins was • nurtory.maid in the Plain. tiff's family the year before last, and had left the service 16 months since. The Plaintiff appeared to be en attentive hothead to his wife, and was fond of his eli:lcires. Mr. Santee% Peacock. a Lieutenant in the Navy, end brother of the Plaintiff, stated that he was in the habit of visiting the Plaintiff and his wife, and they appeered to live happily Did not know the Defendant —never aw him at Plaintiff's hoop. Deft slept at Plaintiff's house en the sight the letter in question was obtained by the Plaintiff. Heard an altercation between Plaintiff end his wife. The lat ter said, " You shan't have it—it is my letter."— Heard the bedroom door open, and • rash down stairs. Witness was about getting up, when she Plaintiff came to him with • light, and requested him to get op. He appeared in great dottrel.— Witness got up and went Get, end saw Mrs. Pea cock in her bedpan, without shoes and stockings. Witness old, " For God's sake, what is the mat ter ?—compose yourself, and don't Peptise yourself to your servants." The Plaintiff had a letter grasped in his hand, and was going to read it, 'Then Mrs. P k snatched at it, bet rushed into her bed-room, and blew the candle oat. A considerable struggle and altercation afterwards enacted, bet the Plaintiff succeeded in getting the letter. Nest day Sir Henry end Lady Peak, called and took Mrs. Peacock away. Saw the Defendant on Saturday morning (the disturbance mentioned being on a 'rh u mb', night); witness called epee him, and told him that he came about an unpleasant business be tween him end Plaintiffs wife. The Defendant ap peared agitated, and said, " I find I am in a scrape, end most set out of Ras well as I can ;" and added, 0 , that the errors •f youth may lead es into acts which we may afterwards regret, and tibia blast *or future prospects in life." Witness asked him for some letters belonging to Plaletiff's wife, and requested him to deliver them up. He replied, " Certainly act ;" bet if whams would ptedra his word of honour that the Plaintiff's wife would con• sent, he would deliver them-op. Witness said he could pledge himself to no such thing. This was at the ham of the Defendant's father. The De- TH%.,STATLPQMAN Pendent ,eked witelvel tie walk •p stoles, which h did. After some conference het seen thefeedent eta aurthrr i Pf{fltl in th► adjnininot roam hi returniti. and said he maid not give the letters v'. Wilms* had said below athirv, that deliverivg the letters alp might be lb. means of preventing public esposare in a Court of Justice. Defendant said, 'bat was m ist devitable. Crorf•eteminerl.—ln the energy of the singer! which • lines% dearlbetl. Ma. Peacock nitt the letter was not bet's. There was a great deal of confused noise about the letter, one word of which witness could oat repeat. Mrs. Peatisek did not aty it was • letter finis her brother Henry. She might have! aid so. She said she had nothing to do with it, meaning the letter in the Plaintiff's hand at the time. I When witness saw Defendant on thO Saturday morn ing, he said t• him (Defendant) he was sorry that he had got into tech a *crape. Hee*Owed a ge. venation between Plaintiff and himself about • Mr. Maned, some few days after the letter was discover ed. The Plaintiff said he had suspected his wife a lung while; for on going down to his office, after dinner one day, be saw a person whom he supposed to be a Mr. Mound; that be took no farther notice, and went to the office; that on his return home, be tween nine and ten, be asked his wife whether any body had been there? and she said, " No perm ;" that he then asked of the servants whether soy body bad b..en there? and they said, " Yes, Mr. Magri bas been here for nearly an hour." Witness told his brother, that as Mr. Masud was Ms wife's brother. in.law, there was nothing In that circumstance to eacite suspicion. This was after the Plaintiff had said he suspected his wife with Mr. Mound. membered • conversation also with hit brother 'bold a Mr. Bandield, es to the treatment of Mrs. Pea cock's children. The Defendant was about 19 or 20 years of age. Mrs. Peacock was about VI. The Plaintiff was a law-statioser in Chancery-lane; be was about 36 or 37 years old-; his private hoes* was io Burton-street, Berton-crescent. Alexander Knight, clerk in the Ace of Mr. Campbell, army agent, prov. 4 the band-writing of the Defendant to the letter in question; Defendant had been a clerk in Mr. Campbell's office, and was now a half-pay ensign in the army. The letter was then put in and read. Mr. John Derbyshire, brother of the Defendant, said, his father wasa surgeon and apothecary,in Bee ners-street, Ozford-street. Defendant boarded with his father. Mr. Derbyshire, the elder, attended Mr. Peacock's family professionally. Witness and De. fondant visited at the Plaintiff's house. Never saw the letter in question, bet beard it read Never saw nor heard of the present mentioned in the letter. Has seen Mrs. Peacock at his father's house in the day time, in company either with her brother or her husband. Never knew of the Defendant smooths Mrs. Petcock in the street. Nicer saw any of bee letters to him. Witness was the person whom the Defendant consulted sheet giving up the letters, which Lieutenant Peacock called about, and to Ishii* the latter had spoken in his evidence. Witness said to Defendant on that occasion, that if be really Mad nay letters of Mss. Peacock he lipoid advise him net 'gait* them op. Cross-ezamined—Witness bad sits brothers and two sisters. vs. Defendant was on half-psy as an ensign, and was ant twenty. Did not know of any means of subsisting be had, wept bit half. pay. ite-examined.—Kilness hal since even Mrs. P. c. , tlc accidentally in the street, but did not know that the Defendant had men her ; etcept by chance be might have teen her at a distance in the street. • Ilene the Plaintiff's case dosed. Alt. ADAM proceeded to address the Jury on be half of the Defendant, but Mr. ScAnt.crr interposed, and said he did not mean to interrupt his Learned Friend's ob aaaaa dons; bet es he bad naturally anticipated the way in which the case mutt be left to the Jury, he felt that there was not st.fficient evidence of the fact of adultery to warrant a concletion of c•iminality ; and, therefore. with the consent of the Learned Jedge, he would withdraw the case from the consiJeratroo of ti.. Jury, mere especially as he perceived his Lordship i• be inclined to concur with him in thinking that the nee coals: net with any expectation of a verdict. The CHIEF JUSTICE appeared to acquiesce, sod tile Plaintiff was aentaited. COURT OF OF COMMON ?LEAS, Jrtv 3. ASSAULT. nitasn v. MAOOOx Mr. &et seise opened the declaration in this case. Mr. Serjeant la is stated the facts to the Joey ;I end from his statement it appeared, that the Plaintiff and Defendant we►e distantly ►elated. The Plaintiff , had the happiness to be married to • beautiful s ass, s circumstance, which, from some cause or other, es• cited the envy of the Defendant, end be determined to mar hi. happiness. To effect this diabolical pu pas*, be took frequent occasions to speak of the Plaintiff's wife, and to sae gestures with respect to his intimacy with her, such as left no doubt on the minds of the spectators. as to the insinuation which he meant to convey. Fortunately for the be bad too much confidence in the honour of his wife to permit these gross allusions to alter his affectiors. towards her. Ile treated them with cootempt, until at last the Defendant thought proper frequently to appear in the neighbourhood of his residence at LW osondsey, and by presenting himself in front of his house, to give edditional weight to his *opposed if!. 'ague. On rime of these occasions, the 19th of Aprd, the Plsiatiff observed him, sad immediately went to hien to ask an explanation of the unmanly and disgraceful reports which be had been circulating.— The Defendant immediately struck him wit► his umbrella on the aide, and then raising the instrument in a horizontal position, ;slanged the ferrule end into I his eye. The agony oecasion.d by this outrage, in duced the Plaisit.ff to crouch towards the ground, and while is that siteation the Defendant, who had retired for about five yards, returned, and Wm manly renewed his violence by plunging the um brella in the same way against his ribs. The Plain. tiff was conveyed, bathed in blond, In a Surgeon, and from thence in a senseless state to Coy's Hos pital, where be rectlaiued for two months under the rare of Mr. Cooper, nephew to Mr. Ashley Cooper. On esemining the injury which he bad received, the bone of his eye was found dvtcosed ) but t►e tight was happily nroserted. One of his ribs was a l so anialnd.rd Ur. !In'nPkrie*. hke COM 1 1m." rwri.r. le reemve Ike . * tract aced. For ibis outrage the Plaintiff stow soeght L." L sad viog :s ik :d " l n w ie . l3 ; w rae n r " .• compensation in damages ; which Mr. ierjeant Leg, Nod mr. tiooph.tr. swring oiler ittutti% set 51. 4.1.41ta ate espresserd a hope would be such as to prevent the re. E'•" 4 ". bad an a ll i ec """ I " " I " "t o lar ") morel. ur au • Gutter cospeteot per-00, to stks oh .4 ts.ss dos petition of aimless courloct in future. br(wero toe woolly,. Pita nitntKses we=n called to prose the. facts, ell s; l, . Cletre •'Ron. sad the other Jarles, said, there co.rld of whom swore that the blows ware indettly 11.. r iw u r i Lliuipw." be,2 7, 1 :7 „ 4 . :; .0 1 4 " 7 .. ./1 "". . - 4 , 11 1, a Ire which side of the Defendant, sod that the Plaintiff nears settlesee illarreace. u. tistr asis e :. s o :17 . is s hb,jac once veteran' them. It also appeared that daring I "laciest .01.P.Diiinn and Blom at .he tate. ot the *mine. lotions lair Disagreed to, sad the loo , ter octal to a referent. tßis violence, the Defesdaat renewed his abler on the Plaintiff's wife. On the part of the Defendant, Mr. Serjelnt Coe- LSI', assisted by Mr. ADOLPHUS, contended, that the Plaintiff had committed the first assault. It ass denied that the Defendant bad gone to the neighbour. hood of the Plaintiff's house for the purpose insinomed. The troth was, that fin Plaiatiff wood biro money, and that be want to ascertain his situation in life ; for this purpose ha went into the Lord Wellingt on public hoes., which was directly opposite to ihs Plaintill's boost, and while these the Plaintiff came its and in sulted him, by applying to him offensive Isnewsge, and bustling him with his elbow. The Plaintiff brying gone eel, the I)efendaot also west away, bat was followed by Ow Plaintiff, who called him a " squint eyed, blear-eyed old rascal !" and desired him to stop. The Defendant attempted to pursue his course, bat the Plaintiff got before him, shoved him against the wall, and struck him ; a scuffle esisueJ, in which the umbrella went accidentally into the Plaiotiff 's eye. To prove this defence, the landlady of the Lord Wellington and her pot-boy were called, both of whom spoke of aggressions basing been coos menced by the Plaintiff. With respect to lb. missal. in the street, two witnesses swore that the Plaintiff was the lint to strike. POLICE. JUVENILE UELINQUI:NtY. Ilimisrowwousw. —Saturday W. lies, J. lebh J sod C. 11,1118, J. Soure.s. •od awe het. w tee gee. , w h ',Wye earoderable quantity of Mori and b.oits, the proper") , of Ildr. J. II rd, shoe- tank er, Uwap • , .le. Mary Kelly, a drier is mingle norms, is enmoismin reef. Sohn. o it charged with receiving pa,l of the property, know in: thew to be atilea.—All Me male Prissmen wane ruder II ye I'. of :sea. I rpeured from the %Wawa a Vie Presenter. that Meat mi-anl swarm, in the amount Sr amt.' tam ISt. the etagere lieu. who was as apprentice ID the Prosecutor, baume sts pened, awl was teen by Ilbeckiey, another apprestiee, to Sass ...w.gbani to the other Privateer, who sore to the habit of Asp. log about the shop in the :1116,11te of the Prweeitior Tary *Wel runerereatly apprehended, when Swarm, sae of the i•idari mode a Kill ae.elotare tee whole Intwenetiow. and pointed net the sourer is which the gond. had twee dlspased of; p.m et INew had bees wad t.. the Proms,/ ‘!:nry Kelly. The polars of the eptel had twee equally /hitch-ft ..oinogst them. Several pawahrohen pt-ved hat me received ems Sr ohs wadi in pledge true the Prawn. The WM. Mayest said, shot it was truly lawessoble so view the encrearlos .tuber of three juvenile delimpseati, which he wholly attributed lota. culpable *regretter of their parrots is sot keeptag them trader dee restramil. Three were a. lea to -a It boys 'senior/ .he day before spas similar eb:ages. la dd. is stasee there were name of them who could plead twee•-isy hi easermation of the crime. It was his duty is regent their living an the Public t he. thereebre, folly committed the walls so take their trial as the OW Bailey. lino writ err.— Omits Mahout, was M SaturJas ems. mined as the charge Sr steelier a qestwat, if feet fro. the hoar of Mr. %midi. timsosiewsuctre, at the Owe of the fro is Saturday ia'anight. IMPORTANT CASE OF ROBBERY. Mr. Serjeaot Lain having replied, The I.OIID Clllll JOIITICIL said, it well for the Jury to &Tide upon the conflicting testimony which bad been submitted to them. Five wit had sworn that the Dafesdast committed the first assault, while Iwo swore the reverse. To the probability of leach story the Jury would attend, and give their verdict accordingly. It certainly did appear to him, that the Plaintiff had ftrought this quarrel spec himself, whatever might have bees the original is. docoment ; for tba Defendant, it appeared, was actually walking away when stopped by the Plaintiff, as was alleged by himself to demand an etplanation of something that bad goons by. The Jury would say, whether they were satisfied that the Defendant had committed the first assault, stud if he had, to what compensation the Plointiff was entitled for the serious injury be bad received. The Jury after a short deliberation, found a tort dict for the l'isintiff—Damages, 51.: costs, 44.4. COCRT OF EIICH LOWER. Jiti.v . 3. Tilt ATTOIIIIIY•GILIIINAL 11. 11.1.15, ALIA , toomesorr. This was an information filed against the Defend• ant, which charged that he was one of the crew of a smuggling boat called the Flora, sod was on board of Ow said boat at the time she was laden with con. trabsed spirits, whereby he became liable to a penalty of 1001. The facts soder which the information was filed were these :—Oa the T. 5 of September, 1815, the Swallow reveilles cutter was on a cruise tsetse's the French coast and Dover. In this ailoatioo, the Captain (Dishy) perceived two boats comiog from j the French thorn, and making for England; Ito le. mediately ordered out two of his own boats le pausal, and with his spj-glass observed that the firat.menlioned boats on seeing his boats ap. preach, attempted to retorts to the port from 4 brace they came; finding their retreat cut off, 'loiterer. they began by throwing somethiag •verboard, which afterwards droves, to be sinkers of Hollatitis sod brandy. The boats were finally captured, God proved to be the Fly and the Flora. The crews were brought on board the Swallow. They were eight in panther, and among them wet the Defendost. As is atria upon such occasions, they were vest too board a ship of war, there to serve before tie mast,: and the boats and spirits were sant to the Cottons., house, where they were condemned. On the 15'h of September, a Sheriff:a 011iter came aloof'. I side the Hastings, on board which the Defentiast was, and produced a writ for bit Captain being Do shore, the I.:.ratenant in command diet not know how to act ; but in order that the opinion of the Captain might be taken, he sent the Defendant in one of the ship's boats, accompattied by else Sheriff's cheer, 00 shore. The moment the j boat touched the bench, however, the Defendant , jumped oat, ran off, and raped. Ile was not again I discovered till a late period its the last year, when the present information was filed oglinst 'lles* facts were clearly proved by *bit °eters both of the Swallow revenue cotter and the Hastings. The COMMON SERJLANT made an ineffectual ad. dress to the Jury on thorn of the Defendant, sad • verdict was found for the Crown. IMPORTANT CASE TO WIIARFINGERS AND OTHERS. ids DOW t• TIE MATT= Or ZNIIIOLsom. A AAAAA Orr. The Souctroelicezen. mid, he rose to show came agaiii-lt a note obtained by Mr. Jere's. calling au the Alloraey-Geoltal to absn curse why property wised by virtue alas extant IliMai• on the part of the Crown, spirt the property of Mr. A. ibis. sense • baeltrept. sad w was a debtor Is the Crown la commenter of the faller' of a simple moven to the ammatof upwards of tail. Se. 6d. shoold set be raServid to a Mr. %v.. Humphries. at least mooch of the asset. as 11971.1 a. SI. lie, by vim., of his heehaws. as wharlogm, baying a Ilea there. mt. The Solicitor.C.eaeral slated. I. support of the chimes of the Crown, that Mr. Humphries wilt and imilld to as ea. estio:nn from the operating of as extent any more thin other people. ofd if he was. he hadeforfeited all claim by not putting .t forward at the time oldie selsare : to prove this he put in the affidavit of Mr. Jerrie, a aberill's Officer, which elated, that no oppool.lon bad hen made by Mr. Homplories sat sloe time ai lasing such an execution. la support at this statement she be licitorGeoeral cited 'ander cams, sod coacintled by sapialk this rule mug be discharged. Mr. CITIRIL. on the same Mole, said be perfectly area Rah the Swlicitor.Genercl. and obookl frausie the Court- Mr. Jtevto, on the part of the appliemina. staled, tbsl dm mile must be made obsolete. for a. the law small, all persons Is the silent ion of Mr. Ilinwparies most he exempt (rum the open. Won of an exteut executed me goods under their can, awl es which they had is lien for any former claims oil aesssat if carriage or other trade charge.. A. the care atoll. hie Cling wow a wharfinger la Snail sof k. sod khe goods sere sem to him by Imuserwin at various times. in such capacity. to sake care of ant deliver. and that lit .he discharge of such ditty the pre tent debt so ns iv/ muted' aid it was • doctrine at Commoot Law. recorded nod never attempted t.. be denied, that wharlogers, commoo and efary 5..;• person, had at all times a claim as owe goods. and mild detail' them until claim were miltifed. With respect to the Solicitnr.tienerini Mae weds Mint as opposition was wade at the lime of the seizure, be e• told dittlectly pewee that Mr. Ilemphries bad made a um. dent oppositiaa tameable him minim an action against obs fikerillf for a impose. The positive law was. tilt' his (Menthe/ a lien ow the property. end he frosted their Lordship. would Pal overturn it where the law impireit n hursh.m it wo.fel at. soap in4e.shify per.mm • -riot tt, *pm ct:ims. .Iht !am Twines Youce Orracr.—Satorday. We. baionra. a pee• saaeotserratit oldie London Dock tutapany. sod Mr.Tetehard s a respectable bresp-st. Must, twilling la the city. were charged silk feloaioorly itettlimg arterial bemired weight of hemp, the property of the Loadois Dock Cnwpasy. J. Seidl. I)epaty Warehouse-keeper be the Company. owed. NW is errowneroce .tae sespicsocts she* were woo-mimed of the integrity of the haneos, whore dray it so. to take an account of Ike weights of the goods takes . at of the Mocks he was employed Wok • ■ a committetable 11111111.:‘.. 1 heap wa s l a be takes out of the Moths by Mr. fat hard, to ieste.rio gate the procredia(s of Saran. 1k swerredi.%!• po,ted Mato tell in • r•mm edjulinott Is that is whirs she awe& s bete lo be weighed, and where be could overbear wad tee ns v use wits* took place. VI lies she good* were weighed be um& down their weights as they were cried by tire labourer alw weighed them, sod he vim through .. hole the Primmer. Mr. Tatchard, is beavertail** with Samosa, who altered the ac costs of the litigate, whilst Tatrtiatil anetin. bed his. 6 ,4 seemed by ha aciinur as if be erre direetiug Wm. The Pri. toner, Samos, had is wile two nettles el the • eight., mad is coategoence of their disagreeserat the gro,.d• were mopped at she gate and re-weighed, ob is titer were forsod tar be several boadred weight above she gamuts) named by the Priem*, is his pas sate, a bleb win pudoerd Is his oirip hum‘wri James Ruchnter. a r is the dark, weighed the limp la bsestios, and •tairti toe& ,ght t., roe Pri•oner Swesm, ter him to take as areas/dor it. The whams stated t , e or. of WM weights to the best of his re:alkalise, end wber:l, blow cam parties, exactly ed aisle Wow takes by beans. .1. it. Tersley. Clerk to the Compaq, bur •rot it Summon for the hook in obeli she weigh., Sete eat. red 41.0.. re he goys it to bias be wade an +Ageratum. r,.yln4 be had wage a take. Several other whimsies were eta/mused, whereto; 'deuce semi to pence a rtr.instance bestir's, she ro• Prisourtrs, sod s osilaaisa sad fair mine. haring hero wade by Soassis, f.• •he of aibtaininglllllle fir Mr. Tate taloa be a., e= to receive by Mr order. Tile la. ..t. noosed b. the ri ms shithead by the fraudulent miry would (all upon the Dock Co...pan y. Mr Tiorbanl, in bit derente, denied that there bad been any callerion as rriniarslisy • harer,er. lie as per.ent is we the gnu& spiehed for his min protection, awl titre being a ;Alpo. hie error in she para-itere, be had mushily gives it st &wow fur altecasioa. Sawa. is Ile defter,. admitted that hr had mode as erre, isehe eotry,which he had retitled. but be drawl saving made sup eraser, ft/ retries with tit- (Testiest views legsted . 0 him. The Solicitor of the Corapaey nod it sal the* spigots frow the evideare aildoced, .bat both the Prisoners were equally guilty of the eritalual attempt a tab ..ta NNW! waren) has as dee. Ile premed 'heir beim( eowneit:rd for triad. Mr. Pates, who istteaded as Solicitor is behalf lie Primmest, replied, as alai Mr. AIVILPISOS, is behalf of Mr Trocherd. who .erwm-es. emitted the witemrs...asol es-.railed .itat. sheer • or set she I act evi.leare to erinalait. his Chest. • hew Wattle ow Owen evideare of the impsisibility of his Myles been gail• saw clime wit% • hie% he am charged. The M•GS• was of s t riatum that the eviderwe agaratt Mr. Taichard www• solidest to wombat Wu sling Mies for trial spool she cbarge it felony. yet it we..... a. to reader is lestaerinns spite him se send Is. is trial for a sse4e messuor of recritiag the (aids kwwiar, ter 1., be trotre•— With respect Is the Primary hassem. she eirideuce •as nr a Praeger moire, he showid, therefore, be oluiged to .cad him before a Jury spina the capital charge Of Glory. Math the Prisons were restesded esti' seat Saturday. 61101tTONVIGHT RNEMD. l.'Rtos•/►LL—Saturday Philip Howe. WOO .e.mniird lie fnre air. Au.ax and Mr. C its, charged ss Manias Weal sbnn in 'trig' t. It appeared that on Friday, a MAR named Canards. went In the sh .p of the 1/rfeadatt, sad parrluned War half owners 1 loaves, in the 111. , te which there was a debetnicy of eleven 0111111141. The defen-e set up was. that the baker had qv/levelled with his jitirseywan, she, oat of troe p. had boned the smile bairn. and the delleleoey was theabianed by taspnty. The blasintares reprobated is terms of becnetec severity. t►e partite at sebiag bread 'ban aweigh!, sad said Mk was • vet; pr•.prr rare fur the iallintaw of thy fall pesaity, which was c ■ . for each defic lent. mad the lasses 11111 be farfeited. Several tither smut convictions took place fot stoiilat of (micas- BIRTHS. the the la ird.la Idecline maliaqvare;tile Lady of Capers Gr.t Merriam. Ea. b. a. as R. Om ilie TI last. at Teresina. Mn. ' Van, of aam MARRIED la February lart. al Madras. Mara. aerjeaat. lid. to Jaw yiftmarst Ambler ofst ile late Rev. Jolla Lase, Vicar of SawbrAgesroeth, On the Is' inst. at Si. Mary's Neu tattoo. Chelan Magna Manager, E-q wf Wshoorth, to Mary only daughter of tit late Carsten flotilla -taw, km. of MelMoor•square. DIED. ------ On the 6tb May. at Qoehee. is Camila, Gavin Maktr Ha milton. ?Ifni 'nig/ Mr. W. Magaikom, merchant, of New City Chaathers. sad at ampule. On the ha lint. Mr. John Oldham flonActm, aged at b . * ►oaar. is firma florreparect, Machinate-road. At Stockwell. n• at: evening et the Ai bast. Mr. Janet Mackay. of th► Foreign Departoiest of the tt'ar•O!llrr. On the 3g ism. at ht. father's helm. lii neuter wane maw. William kiaollichl name, Sag. ♦. S. Fellow of King', Cvlielo. Cambridge. tea thegla rte. in the 39th year of hip arr. Mr. George Dew mallow, of Volvariaactem, and nituaford FRENCH STOCKS, AT PARIS. Jun r St. 5 pet Gal. Ana. vita die. fras Much r.t.s ti; phip Cank ShArec 'silo dot. from Jan. 1. 1117 .5.) Es. kinge ionlida% 94.) d 24 65 ‘l.4w , Date di" 30 day', S2l 85 al nt.ey Ix leetsoo<, JoLe S per rent. Amy with do.. Owe liar.4l.f G 9 P 1.1.9480 * 5 per 1 eur. Rie..ies 6 per Gres. 33 FAO,Me 1.0,4 1)01 . I Prinied nod Pnblishri by S. Prnav• Ili Or Z 4 T%.l.9tax Virtcr. No, 4, ltiisbi ry•toutt, Elert.treel.