The Statesman. — London, England, 1815-11-09 00:00:00

Mr. Ltsctt now insisted, that as it was impossible to impute tucker to the Petitioner, he was entitled to the elpetiCeS of his application. Sir SAMUEL. ROHILLE said, that he thought it had been admitterl by Mr. Leach the other day, that there was no ground to charge Mr. Watkins with any mis conduct. He (Sir Samuel Rnmil:y) had long known 'Mr. Watkins as a professional gentleman, and en: tertaitted a good opinion of him. Mr LEACH said, that there was a chain of circum stances in the case which did nos entirely remove from his mind, that this was Mr. ‘Vatkins's Petition. Mr. HART then requested his Lordship to permit the further consideration to stand over till the Corn . . nits.' .ners had been seen.—Ordered. EX-PARTE BEDINGFIELD POGiON AND CLE)IENTINA £0650 N. Mr. NEWLAND stated, that the Petitioners were Infants, who prayed to be removed from their mo ther, and to be placed under the care of a guardian. The Loan CHANCELLOR asked whether there was MI (Muse in Court ? Mr. NEWLAND replied in the negative. The in tants, however, were possessed of properly, their soots having executed a bond to pay them the sum of AI. a-year each. One of the infants was of the age of :foot years, .the other of eight years. Their father came in 1810 from St. Kitt's, and was now a lunatic. Its July, 1815, the wife, Judith Poem, came into this country with the Petitioners, and within two rood), was delivered of a child. It would be shown, that her conduct was extremely bad, and that she received improper visitors. Sometime in the pre sent year, the infants were under the care of their aunts ; but she employed a Sheriff's officer to apply 'for them, and they were now in her custody. The Learned Counsel was prepared to prove by affidavits, that she meant to go With the intents to St. Kitt's, and therefore, he woe instructed to request his Lord .ship to make an order to restrain her from taking I the Petitioners from the jurisdiction of the Court. A copy of the petition bad not been served on Mrs. fugsosr, as she was not to be found; hut if his Lordship granted the prayer -44-itr he would, per. bops, allow the order to be served on her solicitor. LORD CHANCILLON.—" flow do you know that he is her solicitor? You may take the order that she must not carry away the children, but it must be served on her." Mr. HART said, that he was not retained in this , /natter, and knew nothing of the insinuations against , Mrs. Pogson's character. He was, however, ac ;painted with some of the family, who knew she was Isoing abroadA but 4f the children were to be left ere, whet was the Court to do with them, when their only property was only 51. a year? They had been long in the.custody of their mother, and, perhaps, ' the Court would pave before it pronounced au order , go remove them. Mr. alewx*se replied, that. IDREEIO3O saying, that the ail** iNqjto the custody of the mother. The Loan Cu SCEI.I.Oe said, that 11' the petition was founded on facts, the Court would not refuse !tie prayer of it. COURT OF KlNo's BENCH, Nov.B. CA.EROL V. DC TASTET. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL moved for a rule to .show cause why the verdict for the Defendant in this case should not he set aside, and a new trial had. The case was tried on the tith of July last, at Guildhall, before Lord Ellenborough and a Special Jury. The Learned Attorney observed, that if the opinion of Lord Ellentrorough, however strongly ex pressed, was to be considered final, no man would be less inclined to question that opinion, or more disposed to bow with deference to its justice than himself ; but when he knew that his Lordship would rather derive pleasure from having his judgment fully ; canvassed, than, feel it as a departure from that re spect to which his talents as well as his experience' entitled him, he did not consider it necessary for hint to offer any apology for the steps which he wps now taking. It was his duty strenuously, but humbly, to -in the cause of his Client, in the view in which presented to his imagination—and in doing so , ,ice satisfied he should not he regarded by the luflge to whom lie alluded, as acting with t like a pertinacious adherence to his own ELLENBOROUGA- 46 I fully appreciate the by which you are actuated, and shall wil ten to any thing which you may a , ggest in laid give it every consideration in my power ; which I am tire I stall be joined by my Brothers." ITORNEY-GENICRAL then proceeded to state I , tances of the case, which are no doubt o the recollection of our Readers. The laintiff, he observed, was one of the as two bankrupts, named Parry and Latham, Defendant was a merchant of considerable and respectability, who had employed Parry and Latham to transact business to a • cum for him in respect to his West In qty. Ills particular business, however, by Mr. Parry, Mr. Latham seldom inter _ it. During these transactions, which in fact involved property to the amount of 60,0001. a Mr. Mardell, also a merchant in the City, by some means learnt that acceptances of his were In the hands of Mr. de Tastet, to the amount of 20 or 30,0001. Being perfectly satisfied that there were nu such acceptances of his abroad, he thought it proper to wait upon Mr. de Tastet, for the purpose of seeing those of which he had heard.- --On reaching Mr. de Tastet's, he there met Mr. Parry, and at once, in the presence that person, begged to see the acceptances whip') Isere the subject of his enquiry. Upon being pro. duced, he pronounced them forgeries. Mr. Parry was immediately called upon fpr explanation, epos which he said that it was a mistake, as they were the,acceptances of another house of the same name. Mr. Mar tell said, this could not be true, and de nied that any sorh other house was io existence.— Mr. de Taitet, of coarse, became alarmed, and in t.' Tr. _ vet INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY. Nov. S. 11-PARTE CROWDER RE WATKINS AND COWPER. The; case, ohich underwent an investigation on th • 3d instant, and in which the question of costs wa reserved, .1• • • • • Nippon the it was prow be wits quit Learned Ji any thing opinion. Lord E motives bj gly list,' stints ease, DI e tusk in L. anted B The Art ti.e circum. familiar to present pit spolees of t end the De eminence Messrs. Pa •ery great dia propel w as done I feting in i i ,, .. , .. -~•~s-~~ warm terms calleJ glum Mr. Parry to say where were his rums, his gins, mid his brandies ! fur which lie had received those, as they now appeared to be, forged bills? Mr. Parry answered, that the were all safe ; and they were actually at that time in the %Vest In dia Docks. No more passed at that time, but in a short period Mr. Parry delivered to Mr. tie Tastet the bills, which, by the present action, the Plaintiff sought to recover. Mr. Parry . then ab sconded, and a Contmission• of ginkrupity was sued out against him and his partner • ender this Commission the transaction between Mr. de Tastet end Parry was brought to light, and the assignees considering that an undue preference had been given to Mr. de Tastet by Parry, broeght their action of . trover to recover the money so paid to him for the general benefit of the creditors. On the trial his l Lordship distinctly stated to the Jury his opinion, that, from the cifcumstances in which Parry stood at the time of his delivering up the bills to Mr. de Tastet, namely, with a capital charge hanging over his head, he could not be considered as acting from a desire to give Mr. de Tastet an endue preference, ; but under the operation arising from the fear of pro.' secution. In this judgment the Jury coincided, and therefore found a verdict for the Defendant. What he (the Attorney-General) had now to contend was, that although Parry could not be said to have given in undue preference to Mr. de Tastet, yet, as Mr. de Tastet had received the hills in question, as an t inducement to defeat the ends of public justice, he could not, in law, be considered entitled to retain possession of them. The COURT asked, first, if there was any proof of the forged bills being given up to Parry, or of any actual threat of prosecution being held out to induce ' him to take the steps which he afterwards did ? The Avrontrt.it-Geneass. hating stated that be knew of no such evidence, The COURT unanimously declared their opinion to be, that the conduct of Parry, in giving the bills to Mr. de Tastet, could not be considered as an sedge preference of one creditor over another, bat as so act arising from an apprehension of dapger, whkb, although not threatened, did certainly 41i44 1 and an der the influence of which he acted, • Rule refused. COURT OF COMMON MIAS, Nov, 8. cor.cnarrea V. WADISY. Mr. Serjeant LEms moved fora role to show mute, why a verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted in this case, which *man action on the warranty of a horse, and Ittd been tried at. Gloucester before Mr. Baron Wood. It appeared, that the sum of '271. had been paid for a florae, which died five weeks after the purchase, and on beirig afterwards opened, was found to hare died of con. sumption. Two witnesses, who were farriers, were produced by the Defendant, but the amount of their evidence simply was, that it was a common cal* for horses to die suddenly, without any apparent pre. existing cause.—The Learned Judge had stated to the Jury, that there was nothing here but conjoettire on cue side, against _positive evidence on the other; notirithstawding *hick the Jiffy had foutadipt the v. pefettdent.— Rule frented. GUINON V. 1. azcst O 1111V411ANVIL COMPANY. • • The Sottorton-GtvestAL moved, to itet aside a • l verdict in this case, and for a rule to show smote why a new trial should not be granted, or op. suit entered. The action had been tried before Sir V. Glass, and a Special Jury, at Guildhall, and the circumstances were shortly these :—The Defendauts had instated to the Plaintolla cargo of sugars, bound from Liverpool to Calais, bat the vessel having met with very bad weather soon after sailing, was com. pelted to put back and return to Liverpool. After a period of some delay the assured came upon the, underwriters for a total loss, and the two points in the question were, whether this Plaintiff was justi fied in abandoning the voyage altogether ; sod if he was so justified, whether he had abaudoned in rest- I amiable time? 1 The CHIEF Justice obserted, that it was difficult to come to a decision without the production of the correspondence which had passed between the parties on the subject. It was quite clear, however, from what had been laid door by Mr. Justice Ashburst and Mr. Justice Buller, that the Plaintiff had a right to abandon, nor could this right be •prejudiced by any conduct of the Master of the vessel, unless it could be shown that it was subsequently approved of by the owners. It was the duty, however, of the assured to make his election at once, and as there was some uncertainty from the absence of the let ters upon that point, the rule might be taken iu the mean time. THE STATESMAN. eee+~^ W BROOKSBY V. MATTE. This was also a motion for a new trial in a case tried at the last Ebsez Assizes, before Mr. Justice Le Blanc, on the ground of a misdirection by the Learned Judge to the Jury. The question simply was, whether the Plaintiff, after entering int** cow- . , position for tithes with the Rector of the parish, was at liberty to defend an action brought upon this con tract, by pleading that the Rector had been simoniac ally presented Sir V. Glees agreed entirely with the directions of Mr. Justice Le Blanc, and refused the rule. —Aou-- CnURT Or EXCHEQUER, Nov. 8. PROPERTY TAX--CLEMENT V. LAWSON. This was an application for a rule to show cause : why a nonsuit or verdict for the Defendant should not be entered, or why a new trial should not be granted. The Counsel for the Defendant (who made the ap plication) stated that the action had been tried at the last York Assizes, before Mr. Justice Bailey, and was to receive certain penalties under the Property Tax Act. The declaration had four counts in it ; upon three of which the Jury found for the De fendant, but on one count found for the Plaintiff, which subjected the Defendant to the enormous pe nalty of 1,8001. The case WAS this :--The De fendant bad lent to the Plaintiff the sum of 6001. at common interest, which was secured.not by a mort gage of lands, but by ademise of the lands, atapepper corn rent, which demise was, however, to be, void en the payment of the principal, or regular patmant of the interest of 151-half yearly. Although its a Court of , Equity this transaction might be considered as a I mortgage, and, the interest money considered at; a 'F charge; upon thp lends, yet he submitted that, in which the Prisoner was now chervil, sot i..c,pci hi nt strict law, it was not Suck a'ihaege Ivan 'the . lAnd. to trati4portation, iiiii,nielt as he lied be ef osa ,t iettiiir as brought it within the penal operation of the clause convicted for the same crime. in the Property Tait, upon which the action was Edward Scott deposed, that on the 31 . 1 er Oct o founded. That clause was, isrt any penal* who _ ber, he was into oduc.sl to the Prisoner as a p-rs,,, shall have lent money as a charge upon lands, shall who vended bad moue% ; n:iol hating a gree d t.• ni , - r t refuse to allow the property tax to he retained; shall him on a subnotioent * day, 19 nothe 1 purei,,,,, , ',- forfeit three times the ainoCit of the money so lent." , went on the 241 ins. In Ifit• Cotcnlt) ('roar Toe :dice Upon the wording of this clause, he should first house, Kishopseete, where lie receival Iwo d ei p a observe, that the Legislature had omitted very im- tokens from the Prison e r, of 4150 nomin a l tr!tic if portant words, which were necessary to make .sense three shillings each. For these the witness paid hint of it. In order to express their intention intelligibly, 21 ; but presi o ni In their delivery he eorp.irt.d of a they should have added the words, " every such bye-stander, 64 if all was right ?" when lie was in,. person" shall forfeit, &c. He allowed that it was swered in the affirmative. Immediate!) sf.er the w•i.. the intention of the Legislature to enact the for. ness left the house he went to the Sf.licitur of the feiture, but if they neglected to eapress that listen. Bank, and gave information of the fact. tion from an omission, he trusted that, in a case so , Charles Mathews, the officer, deposed, that in eon highly penal, the Court would not supply those im- sequence of information he took the Prisoner (shor e portant words. It was thus in the construction of a -he accidentally met by Newgate-street o n S en d s , will, it was not sufficient to guess at what was the last) into custody. On that occasio n th e P r i anner intention of the testator, but to see that he had used observed to him, 66 I know what you want with m e • words sufficiently to express that intention. but the Bank cannot yet hang— tr im,. they can only ' The Cuter BARON said, that there was clearly an port me." ' omission in the Act of Parliament, in leaving out those Mr. Westwood, •on the part of the &inciter to the words, but still the Court was bound to construe the Bank, proved that the Prisoner had been congaed Act in the only way by which any sense could be in May, 1814, as a common utterer of bad money, made of the clause. He was inclined to think, that . and had lately emerged from a twelvemonths' im. the transaction stated was not a charge upon lands ' prisonment, to which he had then been setoteneee. ,in the strict legal meaning of the term. It was ins -1 The Prisoner was fully committed for trial. 'Possible, however, to have a nonsuit entered on one I BllADWELle—Benjamin Solomons, a Jew, wit Anna of the declaration, while there were verdicts • charged on the oath of James Williams, a ms e f oe , f !for the Defendant on the other counts. It must be ,of Brill-row, Somers' Town, with having forgelliki, li verdict one way or the other. • I order in his name, by which he obtained 41.10144 The Counsel then proceeded to state the' the India-House, for wages due to him. . .. grounds of his lication for a new trial. At the I Committed for re-examination. Ibis' at York, the PlTentiff had brought forward only ; James Carannoh was charged, on the nails of Jobe 4auto witness (and skit his brother.io-law),. of 'the ! Cornish, a mariner, withhaving robbed him of Re, name of Wilklns9a. This witness positively swore, fin Bank of England notes, and 10s. in silver. that he went Jet . company with the Plaintiff to the ! Prosecutor deposed, that he was discharged frail house of the Defendant, and that they were shown i the Grampus about seven weeks ago, and received into a parlour, where there was no other person I : ten guineas for his wages; when he was paid of he and that the Plaintiff offered the Defendant the : came op the river, in a boat, with the Pri‘olier. who half-yearly payment of 151.• with the deduction ' had been on board, knowing one of his messmates; of 301. for ProperlpTax, bat that the Defendant he went with him to Mrs. Tilmates, Market-street s Apositively refused to allow that deduction.— I Shad nen, for the purpose of getting a bed ; Prisoner Oa his cross-esamination, he denied that Miss Law- ! presseti him to* let him ,here the care of his money, len, or any other person, was in the room at the which he refused ; they 'supped together, and had 'lime. On the part of the Defendant, Miss Lawson some drink ; Prosecutor took out his money to me (his daughter) swore, that she was in the room at the if it safe, when Prisoner stepped across the time; that she received the notes, and took them np room, and laid hold of the pocket-book and forced stain; and that there was not a word said about the it out of his hand, saying that he was drunk, mid deduction on account of the Property Tax. A set.- that he would . take care of it for him ; Prosecutor vast maid of the Defendant's also swore, that she told him he would not let it go, as he could take saw Miss Lawson coming out of the parlour, and care of it himself; he then went to bed, and Psi. going up stairs. In 'summing up the evidence, the sonet followed him, saying he' would sleep with his, leaniog of the Judge who tried the cause, was in fa. and took off his coat and waistcoat ; as soon as Pre. roar of the Defeadant, but the Jury found for the secntor was is bed he pat on his waistcoat via, Pialior. After the trial was over, and the contra. took hie coat over his arm, went down stairs, and dietary sweariog of Wilkinson and Miss Lawson left the house, taking the pocket-book counsioing she had'hicome matter of general conversation in the i money with him. He went again to sea, and did eeighbourhood.,.niest important evidence had been . not return until yesterday, when he saw the Primer, discovered, which would have probably induced the and had him taken into custody. Airy to have bused the other way if it had been I Committed for furthev examination. known at the time. The Learned Counsel then stated the Mistime, a four affidavits that he held in his hand. The first was from a Mr. Thompson, who stated that Ire had called upon the Defendant about the time that this transaction was stated to have takeb place, and being told that the Defendant was then busy in the parlour, he was shown into another room directly opposite. lie saw Miss Lawson come out of the parlour with notes in her hand, and she said to him " Clement has been very good this time, he has paid the last half year." This was a piece of evidence which could not have been produced on the trial, as the Defendant, who is an apothecary, was much in ; the habit of being visited, and could not recollect all ! . : Ipe_BILITV, Aim MINCOIJKAGIW! by the uniform success li the persona who had called on him in the preceding ! Ills Imbue the peculiar method sir Treatment in the run- or mouth. The next affidavit wns from a servant of the a few prevalent Camptaitals, which has hero conheased by the Plaintiff's, who swore that she heard her master say, • .,,,,,"!'„,'"brileen,Y,,,",f,„riVe venee r la 1 :, fi 5 !, e 1 ,7" T,', l ,, g e I S , t i e "pil i e r t i f ee rew 66 Why does Mr. Lawson think of calling his sm.. Medical Men cufflink* thefrwthention i.. e certain etas. of 1),.. vents as witnesses? There was no one present but . raseg , f ile , ""' "/. nod ('O. Mentheni itt she (0524 Cot. Miss Lawson." This evidence, which was from the : sett ° Di-orders i a n risrg ;r n o i m " a u se lli c lu re e t is e , eta d4 iTe t tiv t e h r al t n a v d s i t; l l: Plaintiff's own servant, the Defendant had no means ' cousidetate Youth, which not only occasions n owner-4r. traia of discovering till after the trial. After detailing en °f e N „ e „74 'lls i A lt . : i t: l r ' b t fe olr " " i ns hnis its vmB i i" 'ar lu e lb . e f the other a ffi davits, the Learned Counsel moved for Debilit y m De fir tenc e* r s , i whether " * the c n o t . a u t u. l Tic *l 7 6 o; 7n7 1 :5 !war. a rule to show cause, why the verdict should not be tut habits, excessive thinking, loo_ re :tamer is hot ditniufe, entered generally for the Defendant on the point of or any ttetrr: o , l . l , l f e e r et e l il e t ‘ r. as byrt.;Vi ' r thy the e powersiat e dti of rg tile tna . c n i ttw i t e os„ law, or why a new trial should not be granted upon they offer a firm, safe, and speedy resturatiuo tu gated Sad this fresh evidence, which was not then in the De. vigorous health. fetulaut'spossession.—Rule granted. 1 Where on early application is mode for t h e C ure of a Cit. fain Disorder, frequently rautracted in n moment of ineorte , ty, the eradication es generally completed in the short spun ii llltwo days. nod in the snore advance., and i n veterate emzes it 1 Venereal infection, characterized by Is varioy of p tittful and — ..... aue5 .... -- 1 distressing sympt.wri., a perseverance in their plant woo ..si re. maim to.tiet •.r exercise) will ensure to the P.stient a permaueut MARLaonotrcif-EraraT.—Lord Herbert Stewart au4 radical cure. charged Itirhord Gorzer, driver of the hackney- wi T o l l ie sir lD N i r -r i :res fo oLt i h h e e y t r s et c hra c as i frenntly , e l tr es o c .7l:i i coach, No. 612. with endeavouring to exact more nimintieneen7 i.s an mentinte i .:nd improve . ) Iti a liß e , S i lme s y rre l en" than his fare, and with abuse. His Lordship had ihe 0 1' 1 to rem ove t t t rt t latne GI" "I'd striftt"Th witel Z coach from Oxford-street, and on alighting at King- ` R e n a . g n s,:pr,.i u ... u . . 4 .lllg.„ru t rati h e a,a ile iti7: 4i lit tie les' 4 7 o :f i Ns so u , s n he ,.,, p c : ln i n . street, Covent-garden, he gave the Defendant 9-s. the a.Wsited of very .invEler . 4.• eases, of several years enutinuante, fare being no more than Is. dd. The coachman hawing sicided to their inethe4 ilia few data. after the core sai rum gbled, and his Lordship pulled out some silver, s ure rs bred . attempted f•y other Practitioners t efrft ; e ° has been the agreeable result of is rooter .5t ii t . elr'• and desired him to take his fare. The Defendant Le f ai ß vej h a t ti sri . 4 , ,,, d e in inx y r yllich d pe h riad many these a became boisterous, and a mob Soon collected, and he that the mogetreatinein b.ts Lot, in one single instance., eset ofl , .ftlf .Ti. p ,r er t s.me told the Complainant that a usars-isho refused to p• , .y perfectly : ruled, afte r r i eeeere and t i e iti r ki ff rtu l ai gnel orthnd bed bees. proved, the the fare, was as likely to charge him with robbery.— persevere d taco no purpose, ph :f d o xe f e ar c ie n ci sinu C h e -a nf l al h e i s p , i, ;!::l l4 7 . p i ee ,e, ln n t de m c g rn n it tr ,d l ii - ,.,,,i 1. . it . chase WOW The charge of insolence and abuse being coachman was convicted under the last Coach Act, in he a plett•iaz reeection to k, ow, two by a Proffer ;"" er " r '''' a the penalty of 20s. in default of which lie was nom- in their reuted.rs. the general health is r. 'lnflated, and 15. e 'o mitted to Bridevrell for seven das.peatmcliti removed. .- y ' :4 t-4.rr. Goss antt C.a. exclusively professing the cute of the N James Simpson, gamekeeper to Thomas Willits, h pnie. .at ikulnr complr.int‘, to u: de - that this taay 55,4 he marAd Esq. of Twyford Abbey, was brought up by one 'of i to i s . azilaseti . rea l with the obloquy ro justly I,ltilea.; , l 5: 1 , m f t... the officers, and charged with having violently as. • that they ha v e e l q li t t :r k ap i e s rl h v u e t elisc lu a 4i t i e c d . and s. I litiMatvdesintpt. viol :milted the footman of the above-named Gentleman , . k branch of the P rnfe " i "" It appeared in evidence, that the game-keeper came rit ,l 4 " t i t i o s e'yli d es " e b o l :"=7 l " "te enci bi2l"" r t ) Pr.: l fe lt 4 ah " T i res ih i i d " . l-5 . 4 ; (certificates of whets. from variims into the kitchen, and, from an observation which the m the warmer hemi.phere of l o os y r ciste rn tier‘. world, at well as is footman made to him, he flew at him, threw him ' other hi pasts, emboldens them to insert. that their ntssear h r i ltet u down, and kicked him on the legs and thighs in the ouaiv:cce. heir riain c t7o il ir tlls t ::v d .i i =7,:„ c itell i, 6 !:'', enu „,„T'i r .g e „ .l ,; under Ise most dreadful manner, se as to render him incapable debilitating e ff ects of a life passed tinder the torrid ...... Ape tef attending at the Office in his own behalf, further, that having had espportithiiies. in their protessnaill fa ' pority, of forming an intimnte orytaintonce with she rons , nn- Abigal Bishop, the cook, deposed, that hearing an , Ilona' habits of trafifenat pervons, they offer to them Site hed outcry in the kitchen, she went down and saw liar- assurances of immediate relief ; stun the success rrmlti' f o f she pithy holding Simpson against the kitchen range.--; tie the nc ir , a e l )d r a ac vo r t , fi li ,7 l j a n tt if t r h d e lit c r , " m i " :„ q e sil it e the ir s P re r 7en cli v e t e onf i e l : On her asking him what lie was doing, he replied, h e stintle a fair ground for the y u P opreeedented l o.l , fidelice with would put his head into the fire, and broil his hod watch they have, by the patine, beet's., liberally It.on.ored • for supper. Y ' Patients in the C.nnnt tt y or.- requested to t.t.e the indliedael of their case, age, and wanner of living. etteloeffig " ' elnilthßee The Sitting Magistrate upon a review of the whole ' for advice and medicines. a n d th e renw di en will be given ortfor • evidence, said it was his d u ty t o sen d t h e case b e f ore w a r ded t o any part tot the kingdom. fu he consulted at their howe daily (personally . . or by lett er, a Jury.—Committed. ; post paid) by patients of either sex, with secrecy, delictielf htrorstou.notrsa.—Yesteeslay Jahn Sammons was . aad ese " L te art i Co. li. swoon, 19 Seuverie•street, Fleet-s treet. brought up, and u nd er w en t a fi na l examination, , ma, I. lE4l9.charged with utte r i ng ind baring in his posse ss i on , . a - r.......-............. e ..........,0_et" inantity of three shilling tokens, purporting to be LON DtlN : Printed Red Publi-hed by n ....es L esmt., at the the coin of the Bank of England• The eruct mith . STATtIWA Si OITICa, Ye. 4, Sisfisbur34lllllldableff allid " .._. - One Oay-last week, Mr. DEIIMA, foreman of the paper-mill at Lewes, caught an eel weighing shoat a pound, which had round its body, * littiesbose the vent, a brass curtain ring, and so tightly isles!, , that notwithstanding the slippery nature of the fish, sows force was necessary to rentoveW. DIED. On Monday s Oct. 30. the Rev. Richard itedda, in the 7)1 year of his age t upwards of half a century an eminent Preacher Its the Well!cyan cattaectiaa. POLICE. tin et Rn• `A BrPI the' Mail Ibuildiags err ~lr • now cltarpd, an' j.c'ed hint tuelt as he bud mem, ;o,, a d y rime. , that on the 31.1 i'r 000 4 , th e lei iSoller as a 11.-t% la ; a:nl hating agree,' 1., mail 5) , In flea per 11i..., t ie I h ( . Covent:, ('ros, Towilic• er e he receiv-d two llocp n sols .r, of the nomin3l t..d ue of r these the witness paid him ✓ delivery he etigt.ired of e s right ?" when he was Att. 1111 Immediate! ) u f• er the %O. ven t to the Sflicitor of the ion of the fact. officer, deposed, that in con. to took the Prisoner (ti hot ' pm Newgaie.street o n S un d a Sow y "oak (hat occasion the Prienitor wlta Ttte you want w i t h me; a t k iss b hang—they can only ( roue. Rose price. 5 e part of the Solicito r t o t h e Gaiter, ' 'fist:mei bad been convicted anon utterer of bad money, from a tsw4vonlotiths . TH hod then been sentenced. committed for trial. n Solosnons, a Jew, wit lames Williams, a mariater f Bator( own, with haring forint . .. 4 a% ich he obtained 41.10144 bases . prim 1 gel doe to him. Gallery, ination. Phial hared, on the nails of Jolla x; A fa Pry oti l'having robbed him of 101. Brood-, s, and 10s. in silver. IDDUF isrt ha was discharged frail ell n weeks ago, and received tt e Crvd ; when he Wail paid of he formerly Coaosv ,at, with the Pri‘oner, who tor, in i ring one of his me Imates; bunt, in day of I. 'Flimsies, Mark e t- l i t - Pe t s bar neap of getting a bed; Prisoner Legacies *ill be p S• "( • s:r: that, isi I i• *nut sad in sui thus to as flail cold . S. HO, nude by fashion, I their decl ELIZ. This day THE rat CASE 01 sr ,ordinisi Tlt I A 1., nuusi.roo. Near oiled tures on* Wit!, Tbb wife Gil Dedies* Lnisdiri The Wr b. &I. Argo VA EGSO yarn, titti fain; note neat is Int wile by ins nay not h sess,ed s f , incaotestib forth, nit R. G. Tut facts arths do rile Ot they not kt Tur.ter'ss CI the Arseni, th.neara salseth Fit 55, , Mee Now 3.. 4., 3. • . 9 . Beside, pr, Title!, HORNISIJ THUHtist. TH I $ Prizes 4 '....... • 3 ...... ...... ...... ...... Besides BEGINS , THHEI T• that Ittlisbed p ut the unitrece nearly of the I nearly AL( owe to t a m Lotteries. Tickets a rotu nd " 0 A. PR ? ten s v, Tale /is to d l e,"ntaaspi iu 0 /en ester I Cliallegipt .4kl .1181.1141 that he af when Risen ' t herefore tu b Leiters 4. 4stem, o „. ; excepted). I • .teZta'