The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-02-20 00:00:00

- 7 - rtl l t - W .- - N. . Nt 4, i m p- ~.. • ......:- III iv. • 4 - - LW ~. % . 7 . . lit ......,„ ~, ~, • _ 46 . 64 .. 4 4 ..... , rii.p.i..."1.. _ . ----4t.UlTh Zbe fx) ... ‘.....• . ~ rtmt_ t _ -, _,~; . BRU A ikt Id, 1821. LONDON, TUE -- SDAY, F ------- CAW for hick IPI)E Ar fell in 21i1 'oaths !" nut PRANCIS BURDETT'S SENTENCE. House which would expiate the Ciudad of his Ma- VBSORIPTLONS for PAYING the PINS of jesty's Government with regard to Naples. That 09 WON. Imposed by the Court of Eism's Bench oe Sir paper was now before their Lordshigs, and be (Earl Frauds Ihusiett, are received by the totlowteg permits:— Grey) was sorry to find it did not alftitil that satisfac mr. aimed Brooks, the Ttessaret, t In, &reed. tory emplanation respecting the prtidedce and wisdom Mr. Nuicesbe, St. Peel's Church Yard. Mr. W. essence, Blshopsgatemtreet. of his Majesty's Government in this instance which Mr. Mae 9tin, 011erd-sirest. he expected ; and for that reason he propmed to move Mr. A. 05, O 5, rd ' s et High Holborn. for farther information ; and he shodid, at the mums Mr. a s , let Jerses-street, Cermet Gerdes. time, make some observations respecting the a ff airs of Mr. e, 79, omm-street, Soho. Mr. Clman, St, Illoont-street, Grosvenor-were. Naples. After noticing the declaration Made iu the And at the Crown sad Anchor Tavel'. hined. • 'Circular Nom of the Secretary of State, that Oa sa• BobseriPtiens rwei"d is the C"oir 7 . ar e "l int " general principles it was not allowable to interfere is --'.riled to the Treaseree, Ito. Screed. Louden. , the interim' concerns of other States, be must advert ',. to the monstrous enormity of that principle which was contained in a paper coming from the Allied Sovereigns, and first circulated at Newburgh, and as serted the right of interference in other Uovernments is order to prevent any changes from taking place therein, in case such changes should be hostile to the notions, those Sovereigns might entertain of Monarchy. It mattered net how usaniamas the people of the countries were the changes took place might be In brining them about, or how beneficial they might be to their general _interests, becalm upon those Auto crats devolved the right to sit in jndtuent on the internal acts of ether States, to pronounce a sentence on any improvewents they might choose to adopt for their own benefit, and enforce their decisions by the power of the sword. This monstrous principle went to the extent of dictating to all the liovernments of the world, where any deviations from their notions of Monarchy might take place. Never was any doctrine or principle more intolerable than this. lint this was not the first time the doctrine in question was asserted; for at the time when the late Revolution took place in Spain, a similar principle was asserted in a Note from Prince !Metternich, and also in a Circular from the Court of Russia. The principle was still wore clearly propounded in an article pub lished in the Berlin Court liasette, which broadly stated that no communication should be held wills the new tiovernnsent of Naples, as that would acknow ledge the revolt that bad taken place there, and that no change should be effected there which was not con formable to the Monarchical principle; or rattier the notions entertained by the .%Ilied Sovereigns . as to what that prinriple should be. If such a principle as this were generally to prevail, the condition of man kind would then indeed be 'hopeless ; for no ameliora tion could ever take place except through the will sod the favour of the beneficent Monarchy. Men most hear every kind of evil, they must put up with every kind of oppres.sion, and have no chance of condition except that which came through the favor of Absolute Monarchs. if his !Majesty's Ministers d:sapproved of those principles to which he alluded, how did it happen that they delayed the promulgation at their sentiments respecting it, esti' the 19th of Jometery, last ? Did the note of the Emperor of Russia, and that which appeared at Berlin s as well es timseieelarea tion of Austria escape their notice until that day' They must have had information upon the subject be fore that time ; if so, they either did or they did not remonstrate : if they did, what was to be said of the boasted influence of this country, which appeared to hare had no effect in charging the infeution of the Allied Sovereiesie, thus acting in defiance of our power; and if they did not remonstrate, he wishes' to know what defence they could make Gor such a bane ful dereliction of their duty. Here was a paper coming from Ministers on the 19th of January only four days before the meeting of Parliament, and if the principles he alluded to had been known to them long before that time, it was their duty to have made that declaration sooner ; but in fact it appeared as if the paper bad been issued more fur the purpose .f answering discussions in Parliiment, than of resist ing a principle, which they dares' net openly to avow. lint he would ask what had been the conduct of Mi nisters before this time? Why they appeared as if they were acting is unison with the Allied Powers; for their refusal to receive the Neapolitan Minister is this country was a eunduct which led to a suspicion, that by their connivance they secretly approved of the conduct of these powers towards Naples. Another ground of suspicion was the circumstance of a British squadron being in the bay of Naples at the very t 1 when an Austrian army was assembling on its free. tiers. What was the object of having the squadron 1 there ? This must appear from what did actaally, take place ; fur one of the British vessels nas tes ployed in the degrading office of carrying away the Sovereign of the country, in order that, is obedience to the summons of the Holy Alliance, he might ap pear before their tribunal at Layboch. This was an act of unjustifiable violence which perhaps had sever been exceeded by any other of a similar kind, except that comm itted b y Buonaparte . when he degraded the King of Spain by summoning him before him at Bayonne.--(Cries of " Hear, bear.) Now with respect to the paper isstted b) Ministers on the 19th alt. it purported to have I bad two objects in v iew ; the first oaf to declare . . generally that an interference in the coseeras Naples would be inconsistent with the fandauseetsl laws of this country sad with the principles of inter- II n ational law. In the nex t place. this state paper 44- '1 eland that, with respect to the particular case of Ns lies, the British tioverement expressed disapprohatios eto to the mode sad eircuonstances ander which the' iospolits" Revelation was supposed to bare been effected. Now be would ask what right bad Minis lers to drill such a judgment as to the lUalilier w hich that Revolution bad b ees brought about ? - they had that right they ought net to have earnind it eseept epos the fullest and clearest infonaatiest and why did they take upon themselves to judge with out sash information I • Had they any informatioe through the channels of iudepesinet °oversees:ate' No, but in the very outset of thole circular skirmish they evioced an sa gas p artialit y tewarsie the Allied Soverelps in regard to the steps they were taking against Naples. Thee the Miaistarcadmitird that other states might have a right. to interfere for their ..., security previded their Times were not directed to the purposes of ogriadisenseat, subversive a the No& . . 410.stias . Kayos for the DVSTITI.I LKIP -110110 sod DONATIONS reedela at et BNNl ,„orparr SINNER, oe Tbaredsy, the LAS ikty 41172 1112 wY , Ills.ll Orli Hi g h6"l .1. Rundle', Esq. ZS S • the Deka of York. Jobe PAM. WI. •I I • (14211•0111) ' Ald 10 0 K. Irosside, Fog. - 1 1 0 'T.tulleel of Livetpeol Join Smite. II 3 kV. r f i) B • 36 0 0 —lrlderionsmo, Esq. I 1 0 Lori . Sidmettls J. P. Aanusker, Seq. 11 0 (V. PI - SI 10 0 11. asidaales, Seq. 1 I 0 Lord Oessiugtoe (Nr. • Tbes• Timber, 10 10 0 P.) - 10 '0 0 Cereellesiloytkaq. 11 0 Wm, Wilberforce, Edw. &vire. 'Esq. 11 0 WI Of•P-) M.P. 5 5 0 Buineel BeeelOPek. O. Wesson Tayler. • Esq. 0 II 0 yaw m. p. - 90 0 0 Dr. Dower - II 0 Mr. Aid. Rotbwell 10 10 0 J. T . Watts . Zsti. 9 9 M r . Sheriff Withschild lliams 10 10 0 r. BOUtlit • 10 it/ 0 . Ro , H. Alexander, E. 3 3 5 - II 001 My W s. smith . 11 0 W. M yet - 20 0 0 Mn.s Merry - I I 0 'not. Blat loll . Evi• 5 0 0 Rev. J. Henderson I I 0 0 C. Williamson', Esq. 60 0 T.ear golly. tag. 6 6 )des. Forster - 85 0 Thos. Wright. Esq. 10 10 0 gderstrllorster ,Es q . timbres Moore, Erg. 10 U 0 Ms. -••10 10 0 W.T.Robinscen• Esq. 30 0 Mrs. Ed. Forster, 650 T. F. Forster. Esq• 0 Mr John Wm. Lab- E. Fenster, Att. Esq. 0 bock Rot. - a 0 0 John Pieper, Esq. 0 Tat Rev. Mr. Wiz 11 0 James Soper, Eta. 0 Rev. JrAill Nottige 920 A. M. Causlend, DWI. 0 Mts. F. Dizon ,- 3 3 0 Thomas Witte, jut'. kits. Coy - 11 0I Faq. . 0 3. 4 Clarke. F.sq : '2 2 0 John Hersey. Esq. 0 0 j .F r eshlield, Fsiq. to 5 0 R. coletwor t h , Esq. Es 0 , w.,. vvm Wai i. Esq. 11 0 W. tEs • 0 3 11. ll ca d s haw..Esq• 3 011 { fenny dierey, . M So . Kent. Esq. V 9 0 Charles Dom 0 *, • Jahn Woolley. Es+ 1 I 0 Th om a s Brown. Esq. 0 T..e True IFritoe A.Cltapensn. jitu•Esq. 2 9 0 0 N^espaper - 22 0 Capt. A. Chipman ruff Ashmore, Esq. 111 10 0 A Friend 1 1 0 . 1 1 0 Er% • 1 • Illeullirwe 1 1 T. Hend ersee • Esq. 3. 11. Capper. Esq. 9 9 U Thos. Dakota. Esq. V 2 2 1 ai4ii Tenn,. Esq. i 1 I ` . Mr. Robert WO Mr. 1 0 tieorge Palmer. F.sq. 3 3 0 A La i ty by Mr. Lead 1 1 0 :WT Woo: Potbor 1 1 0 I Rev. Jobe C.ollin 1 1 0 s• ( 701004 . El- 10 In 0 ! Robert Briscoe, EA. I 1 0 10 10 6 %. A.tioldsmid; Esq. V i es, Roberts,`3 5 0 Esc 1,. Jo-.epit. Esq. 33 0 Robert Salton. Esq. ab 9 11. Elissos. Esq. 23 0 Robert Sutton,. just. 9 9 0 J. G:olien. r.aq. S 3 0 Esq. B. A. lioldsettiniet. John Dutton. Esq. I I 0 Esq. - 33 0 1 Messrs. Pestock. .1 .L. (loldsntid,Esq 3 3 0 and Ce. ........ . 0 A 0 J. Joseph. Esq. •• .. V 2 0 M rs . Collet... • . .. 2 II 0 A. Joseph.. Esq.... 9 9 0 Tlins. Jacksoe. Seq. 1 1 0 H. Jokeplt, Esq.• •.. S S 9 B. Douglas. ft A.•• II I U Lem Hon art, }".4... 2 2 0 E. Nora ., E.g..... 1 i 0 MA. Itolomona,Esq. 2 9 0 J. Fish, Esq ...... . 10 1 I 0 0 Judah Cohen , Eaq.• 22 0 11. (live, Esq. ... 0 Lewis Aron.. F:sq.. V V 01 R. P. Ciltran, Esq.. 6 6 0 H. hallo. E5q...... 9 te 0 Capt. Reinter. lt. N. ' II 9 2 0 R. itsplbael, Esq... 0 H. Ballard, Esq.• •. I 1 A. Hort, Esq_. ••• •• OJ. Morgan, Fief.— I 1 0 M. A. 1.0. K•q... OJ. Pulley. Esq.. •• .1 1 0 J. Ltql. F. 01.. •.. OD. Rainier, Esq.• —1 1 0 . h. Hart, esq.. ••• •• OJ. 0. Harris. Esq 2V 0 J. VAnovre. F.4q... OR. Harris. Esq._._•• 2 2 'ft 1.. Phillips, Esq..• • 0/ R. S an d e rson, Esq 3 6 Hymen Coben• Esq. 3 3 0 M. J. Ilerts, Nag— V Judah Cairn. Esq.. 3 3 0 N. J. Curtois , Esq 1 q Anil. Color°, 11141... 33 0 J. Clark ston , Esq• I • IL Clo:rehill; Esq.. 1 . 101 A. M•Leary. Esq• • I 11 R.-- NI. 0wr0..... 1 10 J. fondue, Esq. ••• I 0 FA'. Warner. Esq.. A 0 to Jas. Moody . ' 0 T. Moody, Ki 11..... 1 10IJ. B. Moody, ..• John Dickson, re4q. 1 1 0 I . dobaeriptions sod Donations will be thankfully received til the Treasurer. Edward Forster. Earl. No. 6. Ht. Ileletes place. aishopstatr ; The Secretary, No. 30.11octoe-winare , at the Estahlishosents, Ilackney-Road, and Holton. by Mr. Abraham Tettel, t'olleetor, No. s.Carlisle-place, Lambeth b'. Me. John Halt-hard, No. 90, P ic cadill y : by Mr. XJ. Steatich% No. 40. Pall-mall; sad by the principle Seniors in Town end Country. ROBERT CRolfelf. Reer—etiiy. -- -' - WKNI El) isnait4li.itvly Seventy Hood TA 11 RO WORKERS. May have constant entployatent. at No. I. Gatos) -street, Bath-street, St. Lutes. Good priers lilt" ' • IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. }MUSE OF LORDS. MOSIDAY, no. It Xr. Rigbum bronght up certain Accounts from toe 4 :, l 4 loo losers of the National Debt. Some Private Bills were brought up from the Com- moan.' bird FOLEY presented a petition from the inha- Siiantiof the parish of Kidderminster, praying that ntiassies might he adopted for the relief of the trade of ' thr ronatry. His Lordship presented another petition froor the 'inhabitants of Croydon, prityio! that the - tavis!a's name might be inserted in the Liturgy, that ber Mainly might be reinstated in &Mhos' rights. ...Ordered to lie on the table. THE AWED SOVEREIGNS AND *Ma. Earl &MEN said he roe, in patient* et .the Retie* ..41kiid'given on a fornsi.r lay to call of ids Xajesq's • Midden for sense satisfactory lefermatila fan partthet had taken in the proceeding* that were carried us by the Allied SovereigasloWards Naples, ever Alter the a ff airs of that coestry Islas to suite a hosiiik•fi+lirt7, in that most denim* 1111= .cal)ed the Poly Alliance. It would. be that, TheAtst day of the Seesiono he WI " ireti • . v, loodireet the emotion of the Howe to alethisseems i*l4y:ang..witb that view haat asked ti the 4°r le *ahead ( t ithe Admisietraklo. as to e/4a* el it ducamest parportisg to be the Declare iiiirfaibbsitllied !Mare. The Noble Sul thee alemer hkireedynatiefectory news that that abllFlllnear was Bohemian" crweeet ; "Sib* esowl time tiloolaisell he rebel- pviesiple of &Ay woe °oversew* bat - *A Tight etAterferestee in the 'simnel gaup 4elfai thaetherittete ; atibeitilt he shell adlibloi dog Filigbi.be,eerteia eseeptiese is that rnitolpdit 1'414 et .;hg woe lbw the Neale Elbi! be yeti& &stir ley Iwo* , Dien ale .- - totipi syst of Europe is, Mtablished by the late trestles. The conduct of initialers in all these pro mediae was most extraordinary. First, they re fused to acknowledge the Neapolitan Ministers, and, then admitted a right of interference on the part of other powers. On what ground be would suck, could they think of breaking off all in terwar** with the new Uovernment of Naples i No new Sovereign was there to warrant such a change of conduct; the King of Naples was still upon his Throne, with the exception that he did nut exercise arbitrary power. Was there any thing in the character of dial Revolution that could warring such a change of COn -1 duct- Was a Revoltaon condieted without ‘i dingo wed which acknowledged the King to be coasideiod Onts one whirl should put au mid to all amicaule nego tiation and intercourse ? This country bad soma years ago assisted in the establishment of a flee tio vernment in Spain ; we had afterwards seen that U i- 1 sentiment overturned by the present King of Spain ; 1 1 ril jet ticat event produced no suspension of intz-r -aperee _between die country and the Uovernment so jrevointineised. Why then should a political change break MT the intercourse between one nation and an other? Unless it should be conteade.l ihat their was one rule for a Government overturned by a King; and another fur a Uovernment new modelled and improved by the people. However, when he considered the hos tile measures going forward against Naples, and coupled them with the declaration of our own Minis ters, the result was, that they admitted Naples to be an excepted case, and were net hostile to the inter ference of the Allied Suvereiena, provided no ter ritorial aggrandizesnent took place. This doctrine he opposed, as one leading to a system founded on the conveniences by which a certain balance of power could elfect, instead of the establishment of principles of justice. And this convenient balance of power was talked of by men who, to their eternal dispel*, showed the greater part of Saxeuy t.. he seised upon by Prussia—who consented to give up Norway to Sweden, and who made no opposition to the "desire of the greater part of Italy by Austria. The erne principle upon which, in his opinion, the balance of ponwr ought to he inaintaisied, was that preventing powerful from, oppressing weaker States; and not that of promotiog the convenience of countries already aggemelined. it appeared then that Ministers ad mitted Naples to be an exception, and that the attack against that country had not any territorial aggran disement fur its object. The only security that could exist against the danger of such aggrandisement was a strict adherence to justice and to the laws of nations. Aestria was proceeding to attack that country in vio lation of all these laws, and after occupying it with hit troops', what must be the consequence ? He was sin iodated to hope that the Neapolitans would be enemies re:siantsiiteoccecuapgaatiinosnt othfeNsaupplee-s salel power s.ak o e f a th ay eir effec eam tha Ass Insvt . billow ; end what security then could we lore iiirailit tr:reitorial aggrourlineimiat en the part of Austria, en whose power Naples most be entirely de okoilant. Who rouid tell how far this principle of in jistitbe might extend, and what misfortunes it might lead to throughout Europe. lie would place no more reliance on any assertion or declaration of the Austrian Cabinet than he %ritul upon a promise egad* by the Bank of Vienna. Ira, it to be sup lewd that Austria, after getting possession of Naples , 7irsuld all iti a sodden become moderate awl just ? No; they had all seen - considerable jealousiesand a prevail tug is the early .pericel of the Courederacy fter `the seizure of Naples might not the next step be, a NiHeinstel for compeusation on the part of Ressia, for !the sweetmeat.. given by the Russian Cabinet to this iset of injwltice. All the security then contemplated by Ministers woolil be good f,r nothing. The State paper, to which he &heady alluded, declared that his 3lajesty's Ministers hail acted with all possible ex plicitness.on this subject, as would appear from the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle. Here their Lordships had at instance of the *timidness of principle by which 1 . peace was to he preserved, fur after all the confereneesi that had been held, the business at last came to this, that in the nioiith of December, 1 &!O. the. Allied Sovereigns put one construction on the 'treaties, and the British tiovernusent another. Notwithstaailing all the explanations that had taken place, the Allies de clared the interpretation of them to be such as to imply an assent on the part or treat Britain to the projected Interference in the hairiness of Naples. He denied that in the case of Naples there was any exception to the geoeraiptinciPle laid /town by Minis t er s. There wthere as note OF the ground of necessity, o r before could be any right of interference there must be a real and not a remote and visionary danger. There mast be one that should furnish a jest rrounil for complaint ; such. foe intuere, is therm* promulgating an intention to wrist the rliCalrectarrople of otkr countries to °vertu; *sir goveriummlts.• similar to 4 decree peened by thf Frees+ Convention Is - might he advanced against every Revolution that had ever taken place in the world. All the revolutions which took place is the world were owing to prealone . m iegovernnsent, and were brought about by parties ; and factions. Our own It'volutioo, which took place in 1638, areee from the misgovernment of a tyrant. and it never would have been carried wiiboat . a secret c ombination of those great, good, and M b utat** cha racters whose memories every Engliebtnan or the pre sent day ought to revere; for it was to them we were all indebted to fur the liberties we now enjoyed. This argument, Oleo, WAS most futile. With rasped to the sect called ettrlmuctrf he should hot enter into any jus tification of them. He nwlerstood that they began in . the year 1.,12; and that they were chiefly encouragett, with a view of opposing the usurpationof the French. But supiectieg the revolution to have been begun- by Horse Z.tr by noy small party of men, it could nit ha vitiated on 0 at amount ; for if the people corecorievi in favour of each a change, it mattered not ley whom. or Li Loa tuany persons it had been bruaght,ehput , -. , Then 'levee ;rata revolntion effected in swore peaceable. mariner. No aeisnositiec, no broils accompanied it in its progress, or flowed from it after it was cotiannimated. Stich oleo was the character of the ren'olittion in Spain, anti yet the cir umstaoce of that country's •adoptiog . a new constitution, did Not induce us to suspend our connesion with it. In that country too, a hatinony subsisted loon-reit the Prince and the people, such as antler similar tic( ninstances of change had no esamplo in the history of the world. It is true that revolution was effected by u standing army. Whether that cir cumstance witald have the good coneeeneuce of lessen ing a l a ttie k t f o r keeping tap a standing military force in oilier coontries, he knew not, but this conviction at least it imist for -e upon them, that the tare incident of soldiers beitsOoritied into standing armies, did not and could out prevent them from having the feeling , of men.—allear.)--tiod forbid that it ever should be the character of standing armies, it whatever Part of the world they were kept up, that whatever woe.the extent of oppreasion under which the people suffered, whatever the length to which despotism was deikrons to go, that they should be found the cettain inetra moos of that oppression, and the constata ie fenders of that tyranny.—(llear,)--Ile hailed the part which the armies acted on those occasion', .as the proof that when they became eoldiets, they did not cease to be men. It would afford a useful lesson to. States, and show them how much safer it wive to found governntents in the affection' of the people. than in the strength of military forte. Thole beneficent dispensers of good the Allied Powers of the Continent,—(llear)--said indeed that tires . .. Might he a certain degree of reform allowable iii states, pro vided it was not accomplished by a military ins:ru ment. They asserted that if the military had any share, no matter how small, in any such reform, no matter how meritorious it might be, still on that ac count Ain.% it was a change which was sot to be en forced, which must be reprobated ; and Rttlit it was so reprobated, it should be conellered that legf;i mate Monarchy every where was insecure. Foch was the language of those Powers. lint he would ask those who supported, or who countenanced sorb doc trines as those, what would have beemne of the religion and the liberties of this country, if the army of James the Second had adhered to his fortunes' If ever the principles of our revolution was applicable, at all, the rase of Naples came decidedly within itt influence. What was the doctrine of the Allied Sovereigne? What did it amount to, when divested of all its pretexts. but this, that nit revolution should take place, which bettered the condition of one State, if by so doing it had any effect whatever upon other states ?—What was their language 7. " We will not tolerate freedom in use own etatee, arid we cannot bear it in soar'." Forget ing the ptennises which one of those Sovereigns had made to his people of a free coustitution—a ;mules which to this hour was fatally withbeld..—(tlear )- Forgetting this, and passing over the etertione which they hail made to infuse a spirit of freedom into the mitt& of the people of (lemony, when they h.d to resist it foreign domination, they .even held this strange and inconsisteot language --" We will not allow you to wake any reform which orieinatee with yourselves. Send therefore your King to answer be, fore our tribunal ; resume the chains whirl; you have already worn, and when you have dune so, be control Useseeire such relief from them as we will to afford yew" This crag the I vtignage of what Ite should ever cell the L'it-Iloly Alliance. 'this was the . langnego which the Uovernosent or this toncontry I, id treated w i t h their sanction and Cteat, but wch it was their duty to have marked with their decided disapprobation. The Noble Lord then to ide some obserratiosa vas she secret 'nicht/upon the treaty Winer • Anstria art 4 %spies. By that article it was "an lerstorrl" Os mae a courtly phrase) that the *big of the two Ski ties was te admit no alteration its his dominions. Is as It rpsessssii. perhaps, whether, ht. an, fair eon ' arikle - to - 4 •n• . by the celebrated decree pitied by th*Freacti tAnrcussou was a s t uns... v .--- E . . _ ..... , ve oil the 19111 of November, 179i1. An act of this igeset b o sk-s6at v eto, eo „lii b eim/ a t l o o il y to a ire kited would bet jest 'cause of tar, if remonstrances tb a agiihicb ailed take placclwthe,ctatltsbUs 4 o 3 ant o f alai negociotioas failed. The right of interfereurethen, alb, li esit stisaw sj oeernat eae . sa s , a2 a lt 'veto .. b o . tsl be contended, must arise out of facts ; bnt the anjust a pptpkendot that if that itytieli tette ill be &onside:mg , er . and Inosstroas principle was never before admitted, that as a p er peniat ipaarantee pa • •tttip . paill,9l - /he ICU. de- a people making improvements within their- own against sa i l ilfroce as betty?* Alp, &Ad `leis awn pm- a . country, and for their out beoe fi t, were to be at- ~it * A s ir A ist ab i .ifiv..: piailt a: itie femme ion tacked and 'suppressed by the fireiVlSlVarms- 11 *k‘ 1140elling to the ' riei*Aile • hare willies she worstrons avid info:mos a doctrine wats- I s i .. the titre of Natioos. r te4.llr. It was Kt- gem &drilled by . say writer On • matiosal law:: ' lionemp ra i—it wa s i nca asis -` l .. w it.. • a l i bi s ,i o f d ie n i s . politass hal committed no irijafy, tow crinied any peop l e , and i t ea iiit a ted ... ! 4 ', -S o i l W it pe j o & r la beitilitf to giber States. All they bad done was, to pi t which declared ths. . • . , lbw potria it if litisit the prior of their IGng ; widths King caseate to o va s overe ign t o . • --. ofit ' r e a m sr lard .' had 'bees OM- That wale what •Irite4l she vet" ovoid rout:Dui the •itdg , •". seed thvirtireet rvk which the.Soverrig , . it* . " :villOPC:0 10 " ' ea; tames of the Allied Powers; and langleod soust with- i o ,p ar s aa t, r i g ht s . - : 't n . ti. .. . a es t i . wi ll " dpe t r i s k.. f w herself Prom the dotir of reimoartristlng pitch coo- t i es : Thedip&racter of Ilse Restitution was given in ( c i t i ng bi a aun t f.., • - .` • Abe 4* . Ms? . emote of Gifispo Chiard ; but the Allied sllweririses efficacy of sera 4 ~,,L , ,* • ••• . ,_- '. - see b : two preteMo oa Use paned of usieroodart* their g naw ' l o wa. • 1 •11 .--' • --1 - Te• - • wed lag ; aid sitar th ey Wild tb4 Wititif wain * n u b e „ •'''. , " . 4 . 4 r. '. ci -ti! -ter • lii•ir ly and sot cif addisgreanuematd Primitli*ir lenan i , Zr 1- ..". c" ( / ' . .iL•c 4 .. -.. o b er 'co. .11,hail bear said t h at !Ken; lasigiliiisie •. , .r. ‘,/,. • ‘; 4. .;x ..., •i i rt-Pi • ~. Act ows .or pactilKll,pres who were . nsaialy_lillelfiglaisl ..•.: c ''• 1 .si ', l l , la ( sh e latliPllt fist revolution. if tlinriliAkis, ail • .. : ' ..* - 1.. . r'4 1 '; 1,... ...47 - 1'... , 10t e ' " 4 "a l- - lim WYesJb . is . egia,. 7 . Alpetion, it was ate objeWoMbait a s istastelt . . +.: '!-,... -A. •••• • if.'v . • •.. • . , .. , •, • -. ‘ . .., ..., •.. . i •• . . . . . 41- : ...." •- • • '- '- '''`•ti • ' • ; - ....•& ~, . . 4• i .' • .41 t • . ' . - 4 -.1 • 4 P 4 . Plf . 40 * .* lb • • . . . . * •••• - I . 7r. . : . a • I get / 11 '5 ' .0 4