The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-02-20 00:00:00

-••r,. without any regard to the rights of the people.-- (Hear, lwar.)—The whole actuating principle of that Government, in every part of it, was, that every thing should be done for the benefit of Austria, v.ithont any regard to the interests of Italy. Science, c.,:nmerce, agricelture, languished under the baneful posture of ands a shortsighted policy. Byrn edeca v..Ls impeded, that no, ray of light might be permitted to break in upon the minds of the people.—(Bear. Pen.) Was this, then, a principle to be tolerated ? • Was - Naplil not to be allowed to reform itself ? Was to alteration to be made, no improvement to be allowed in.lklaplei, because the dominions of Austria might by possibility be rendered I. centre in that interest ing portion of the earth?—(Hear, bear.)—lt could net have born forgotten, that on the first of May, 1815, it proclamation was issued by the present King of the Two Siciiies„ pronouncing to the two kingdoms that he would give them " a stable constitution,—that tbe Prince should be the depository of laws, which eltonld be dictated by a wise and enekgeticconstitution." Wi,at efforts were then made to excite the spirit of , . liberty, that•it might act against the enemy! A si wviiir proclatoation was the last act of Murat's rei 4 11 :proclamation which lie hail mentioned was the first act of the "leoitimate " King. The whole malt tben was this, that it was manifest that :the Sovereigns of Europe had combined on Ow prin. . eiple that no Risfornt should take place which did not emanate from the Throne itself—a principle, he main tained, which was inconsistent with the interests of this•conntry. and derogatory from the tr.eneral rights of nation.. He hoped that his Majesty's 31inktets would be able to explain on what principle it was that the revolntion in Spain caused no suspension in the' relations between this country and Spain, and when the same ronstitntion which was formed in Spain was adopted in Naples, it did cause a suspension in the relations between England and the King of the Two Si.-ilies. He was unwilling. to trouble their Lordiltips further. He concurred that at present there were ob jections to the conduct or his Majesty's Mitsi.terc upon this important subject. If they could remove those objections then all would he well—if they cool.' not remove them, he at least wouLl feel the satiscartion in • I.is otrnmind that he had exempted himself from any participation, by his assent, in those measures which had been going on. The Noble Lord then concluded v ith movinr an humble Address to the King, request ing that his Majesty would be graciously pleat:ed to direct copies of all communications which hail passed • between this country and Foreign Powers connected with the Revolution at Naples, to 'be laid before the • Mose. • The Earl of LIVERPOOL assnred the Noble Earl, o.at although he should oppose his motion, he rejoiced at the opportunity which it offered him of explaining what had been the conduct of his Majesty's llovern m-nt more fully than the communication of any official document could have done. We had acted, and he maintained we ought still to act, on a principle of justice and of policy. Ile therefore anticipated that t::eir Lordships would not support a motion for further • information, as it would imply that something eke il.ould he done. The Noble Earl had correctly stated • What had passed in the first part of the Session. lint instance, from example, breasts, ranPle toast lame a more tangible object. • TN 149 had cOmplained, that in disclaiming that p Goveronsent had giros it m their °pinkie, that. they disiPproved of the clicamstances undeir, which the Neapolitan Reiroltdon 1e tisicen Once. it..(LOen Liverpool) bad seen no reason, front any thing which had passed since, to depart from that ppinints. What were the circumstances whiCh called fin: that disap probation ? First, that the mode by which it had been operated was a•mllitary • Mutiny* and secondly. that the Constitution adopted was that,. of Spain.— These, however, were not grounds OPcondiact which called fur the interfirence of foreign powers. IT a State were managed ever sa absurdly. anti if its (loverti ment were altered by wrong instruments, still he ad mitted, these were not the business of Foreign Steel!. If the military mutiny of Naples brought about the adop lien of the Spanish Constitution, and in his opinion. . that was the real state of the case, still he admitted . ;that that was no ground for foreign interference.— '(llear. hear. bear.)—He also admitted, that in great national changes, the army must take some share. 'When the question came to issue, the army must take one side or the other. lint here was a ease in which the army was the instrument which set on foot the plan of the National Revolution. This was nat tile .case of a people demanding a redress of grievantes sod: as existed in this country in The case of Naples was one of military mutiny, secretly fomented by a party. The military mutiny in the 14 , 4 instanee brought about the Revolution alone, without an previons steps having been taken to obtain redress. Again, he admitted, that this was no round for in terference. He only considered the mode in which the revolution was conducted, as it excited his disap probation. Nothing eoui.i, indeed, have been nine, different from the rase of Naples than the rafts of all the great changes which had taken place in r.ngland. Here, at the time of the Great Ch irter, as well as in 16.10 and 1115:1, the graund for redress was first laid by a declaration of specific grievances, and a call far ► rediers roundel' on ancient rights or manifest abuse. lint at Naples it was the ease of a people adopting a foreign Constitution, they nut knowing at the time what that Constitution was. Ile believed it was a fact, that at the time the cry was raised fur the Sparish Constitution, there was not a single ropy of it to be f ou nd in Naples. Ilia all this be allowed was still tia ground for interference ; it was, 110 wryer,' in his view, .• _rotund fur marking it with the strongest dis approbation. II meant to say, that the facts be bad enumerated farmed no ground fur our interference. But there were grin muds upon which fore. a. countries might thini; themselves justifiable in interfering. Ile, however, dill not rise up in this House to vindicate the conduct of the Allies. But there was one feature in the conduct of the new Uovernment at Naples, towards the people of Sicily, which he could nut pass over. Every holly w•ix aware that Sicily uas an inulermlent kingdom, governed by its uwn laws and usage s. Could any one attempt to say, that because the army in Naples brought bunt the Revolution, the people of Sicily were to he excluded froai any voice in the forma tion of the Constitution? When the event of the was made known in Sicily, the strongest feu '!• Id .d \inst it. That was mot arise, for Er. had accompanied that statement with observations timent was fel.t and expressed agar . Melt tended to assert that the paper before the House, the consequence? Naples sent a military totce to sql..ether its contents were right or wronw, had been overawe the general opinion, and to compel the Ski , produced with a view to meet the disenssions which Bans to submit. What hap' rued when the military t::ight arise in Parliament. Now be wished to correct force arrived at Palermo:—When they arrii-e6l there, Hi. misapprehension into which the Noble laird had they fotrol that the diffiettlties with which they hail to fu!len. The Cireular of the Allied Powers hail first tontend were ..renter than they had been Intl to suppose keen known to his Majesty's tiovernment at the etol of anti they entered into a capitulation as reasonable and December, nut as a paper cotnniunicatell to them, but just in its terms as any that was ever concluded. It as thr Project ofa paper to be afterwards coition-A..0(41. men:zit:zed the two parts of the dontitsion—it rerog was. however, t r onenus to suppose that there oiled the ejlille ion between tln•iii—it acknowledged • Lai been no intention of answering it. 11 hen the same . Sovereig-it ; hut it left it to Sicily to deter it was known to be in preparation, it was mine if she would prefer a distinct Parliament, or an net ly stated through the proper channels, t hat incorporation with the Parliament of Naples. The It was a paper which would reqnire an immmetliate an• Neapolitan liovernment, when the treaty went hark, • serer from his Majesty's tiorerntnent. lie was ready refused to ratify it, and they annulled it, and insisted - -red that answer on an unconditional imbeds:ion from the people of lot - one word of Sicily. Now, if the people of Naples bad a ri . ght to a tad nut been re- constitution, had nut . the • people of Skill an the whole year. equal right to act fur • titemselies?-:-(lltite;* hear.) bad heel put —The Noble Earl opposite paierd all this. ~.laration batted Were no complaints allowed to he made tithe acts of 'sequence of the the people. When they had done wrong 141 they hail disclaimed were to be bell up as faultless. He now Came to the Lion, and stated point of the Carbonari. 'The Noble Earl had asserted juvernment had that all great and beneficial Revointionsi • bad been same time that prepared by secret societies. This was a misfortune, publication of but it was true. Ile admitted that if the l'arbonari 'e would be int- were a sect entirely composed of Neapolitans the lore, which had question would be solely confined to their own Oovern- Irv. It was the went. But were they only Neapolitans, or were they • held from the even Italians ? No; it was matter of notoriety that respect to the Bryn- they hail spread intO'Switzerland and parts o f I;er - in a wor.l, on :natty and with much of the French revolutionary tiovernntent had principles they entertained theories which werritostile ;r sentiments.— to the established legitimate antient institntions of finally intended several Contiaeutal States. Ile would give no opinion :been published that the minion-I of the Carbunari jnstifirul the inter- . no modifications ference'of Austria. l:'pOu that subject he would triple which it give no opinion, because be would not prejudge the the fact, that questian. As to the Interruption of the ronattilllllea. lopose a prospective lion between Naples and this Utointry; there wait decide oa - what none. Sir William A'Court was still in Naples, and ;o resolve upon Count Ludo'pli aas here, and a variety of I' Noble Earl had cations hail taken place between both the countries. 'lance ; but first, It was staled stone time ago, that no new powers were' lance ; and se- given to our Minister at Naples. The reason for that irged against it, was in the situation of Naples with respect to Sicily, Inocent and harm- anti they could nut have given those powers of this country, without prejudging that (pest' , anti deciding tis country had against the case of Sicily. Ile bad no difficulty in but those which saying, that this country bad nut anv part in the: There was no removal of the King of Naples to LayKarli. With to principles of respect to the observation of the Noble Lord, on the, of the treaties circumstance of the King of Naptes being embarked ;core of opinion on board a British ship of war, so far from:that being anti himself, a proof of this Government having taken inripirt undoubtedly the proceedings io question, lie should hare ► been case trhich re• aldiamed if that Monarch had' not been affOrdedi with another, such insignificant accomumtlation when ha asked fur it. arse was which The Noble Earl next alluded to 'the peialliel ibich war on another. the'Nohle Earl (tirey) lied attempted to draw imieiti=l .awn sertirlty—the the present Revolution ins apieft atid.thelOrniei4rOlt ander of prinking of the Spanish . nation agaitist JosepVtloistsp l itte. • J 1 the only possible coulsinot;he said 'conceive IWO case"::pe* hi 'of °sweetie/4Y ' fettle each other. In the. case of,'Sliaiti, fUeio growitt Ia d helm witloirititi from theni - by 6( Otti isrutisling for its , tiritcheronsiCts that ever storied the:par. of itory: that ground con ' )ke Sl{iioish people ; * ttki ,o.; • • • • • . .. • : ?. • . . • Le. had arcompanied that statement with oleo. . o Mai tended to assert that the paper before th • wllether its contents were right or wronw, I , produced with a view to meet the diacrission riight arise in Parliament. Now be wished ti •, i tto• niisappreliension into which the Noble I. fallen. The Firrular of the Allied Powers I 1. 4 keen known to his Majesty's Government at ti I December, nut as a paper coinniunicateil to th as thr Project ofa paper to be afti•i•wardscimuni it was, however, i r onenus to suppose th. • Dial been no intention of answering it. it was known to be in preparation, it • t tnctly stated through the proper channel 4 It •Yas a paper which would reqnire an imminei .1 . i • serer from his Majesty's Government. lle W II to _admit that its publication bid rendered that i; .: still more necessary. But there WAS not • one general doctrine in that paper which bad nut ' 1 . restedle uttered by Government during the wlr 4 I, t It night be recollected that a question had I to him last Session respecting. the Declaratia li.,- the Court of Petersburgli, in consequeiii • "evolution in Spain. In his reply he hail di . t! e principle contained in that Declaration, at I • , l t i Cie House that the views of this Guymon teen fully explained to Russia, at the same ti he hail expressed his opinion that the public • tie explanations which had taken place wouli proper. It was no new doctrine, therefore, w teen uttered in December or January. It ' • Isoguage which had been universally held I tit::e of the treat y of Paris ; with tespect to tl lotion in Spain and to that of Naples, in a i every occasiou where his Majesty's Governr • • • iota an opportunity of explaining their setitii i. .., ..: 41 11. believed that it had not been originally eat the Ci ri.o lar oft heAl lies should have been p at least without modifications, although no mod ' t mild have reconciled him to the principle 1 continued. Nis belief was founded on the I t. . • tha.paper in question went to propose apn A . Leave, and was formed with a view to decide ( )1 .,. • frond Uoveroments were in future to resol • ' •Intoeference with foreign states. The Noble • . It Attlatted to what he called the Holy Alliance ; "Allis 'country was no party to that Alliance .; •coritlly, whatever objection might be urged ai . '. 1 s he object would be found ofa eery innocent al lesteateree. As to the engagements of this lie bed nu difficulty in stating that this COll • .futarigagettiasita with Foreign Powers but tho v.-twin the possessron of Parliament. Then Stry I . ', i I ' .. ttev irte u ry it to 'anyai ail b o e f • s o et u n t otrneattihees.. 'lace of ! - them/tither& . .Tlter'r was then no di:re:env,. of hetioeft, the, Noble Earl opposite anal 6n _that "vowel 'principle, that it and . sunlit !be' a••strang and'• special case nil ..qoired the iatbrferimee of oie State with Jrwaiiiffiralh to dlefine what the cause wa ' 1 h Ili 4OM e S Vei gilt 'lO - one ebtistry to ttake war on In-general; It Wight 'be said, its own %rent. .o.evetaitTirlsials eaeh,State- was ,udder of p ilin.lammorlefitti* In 81W allitistdr, the only ilireutwilrhielf justifihd dielbseefetence of au pith tbothail ims ......peate Wail ',Mil issi; couter - thettbsAlisr4llloPatf of if. rtik9lll" ...riliftitri -Ve aillibted; that b at ' Oyu: i l l • a r.'. t:...J- . ‘4.;.44 . 1.....? -! .a. ''. 10.; . •.,:.••7 . .0'; .98. k ...' : : • - *- - 1 1041‘ 1.. 41. 4, • •• .. 4. .1 • ... - • . • .1 r 0 • 1? tba* .o. et .k. ;b«.. e .v. ..• •. '• : r took Op arms in their own fon — llont the country, and for thentseires. Whether that , good or bad was a question which he did not intend .to 'meter upon. It was established by the tegitinaltrikt- Aliority of the Country, and wag trough - I about by the aorta of the Spanish nation, aided by s Noble and Gallant Friend behind him (the Duke of Wellington.) satisfaction that he stated thit the Ambas sador from this country at that time, witetrite save thd King of Spain at Valeheil, *lsm he et teeed. Madrid, advised hidi; under etetain mo diftelatiOns, to accept the Constitution then ten .deted to him. The King, however, adepted different counsel. He determined erns dissolving the Corers, by whom it was desired that the nsodifi coition in the Conetitution should he formed. The circumstances, therefore, were different in the ease of l;ipstin, and differed in this tnaterial points—Mat all (that was done with regard to Spain bore a national Istinsp. For what Was there in it which was sot na tional? Wag there any sect eotecerWed in it different 'from any which existed in other conntries ? Was there, in short, any thing which took from it the e on - plete chararter of a national transaction ? No Foreign Power could be justified in interfering in that ease upon any ground. There were two great questions which arose in orery interference of one Power with another. The first was a moral question—whether the party interfering had a canse to justify that inter ference ? The second was a prudential one—whether if there were a cause, is Mould he wisdom or folly to purine it ? Hr must say that he did not •feel that there was any ground for interference on the part of this country. Ile did not feel, neither, that there ins any groomd whatever for the aid of this eountry being eiren to either side. The Noble Lord had entitled to the manner in which the Kiqr of Naples hail become possessed of his dominions. He could tell the Noble Imes, that he hail become po si of thesis by the in vasion sif an Anstrian army ! He Was placed there by an Austrian army, and with the express stiptlation that that army was t., remain for sonic time, after the ac cession of the King to power. It was due, in justice to that .ll calumniated government of Austria, to state, that the army was withdrawn front that country las soon as the prospect of permanent traisqnillity ap geared, and a rousiderabie time before the termination of the eriell stipulated. With respect to the procla mation to wl ;• is the Noble Earl had referred, and read, he moist express his opinion that it was a spari• out document. He did not mean to vouch for it, lint he felt pretty certain that it was as he hail stated. With respect to the conduct whirl, hail beets adopted towarols Anstris, be believed it was wholly consistent with the honour of his Majes•v's Governmen., and he could not think that it called for any interference on the part of Parliament. There had been no rsinivoca (ion on the part of his Majesty's Government in this affair. Government had not taken any part, and they would sent take any part. If the House conceived that they were not justified in the course they had already pursued towards Austria, they would vote for the production of these papers. Lund HOLLAND declared, that before lie proceed ed to Holiee any of the topics which had been in troduced in the course of the debate, he must say that it appeared to loins, from the view which the Noble Lord opposite (Lord Liverpool) had called upon him to take, that the information before the House was.in sufficient. The Noble Lord said, that if they voted for the production of more papers, they expressed! an Upiait/11 that this government tvonld be justified in in terfering with respect to Austria. Ile denied the po sition of the Noble Lord's. Ile might even acknow ledge Goat the papers they had were satisfactory ; lint still they were ills. plete. The Foreign ronots, a• far as the controversy appeared by the papers on the table, had certainly the better of it. What were the proceedings of the Greve Allied ('warts? They told us that we bail signed treaties, by whirls we were Immod to support and go along with them its the course they were at dais 1110111P1Ii piorsosiog with regard to Naples. The answer to this was, that we recognized the said treaties, hnt denies! we were bound by them. This was very well as far us a flat denial went ; hot this answer also referred to other treatio.9, which modi fied anti explained those insisted upon by the other Courts, and from which we iitferreul that we were not bound to do their liiituling in the present instance. It was evident. therefore, that in glider to make the mat ter clear and explicit to that house, they were bound to produce other papers. hese, however, were not the chief reasons upon which be intended to vote for the production of the said papers. He must confess, that after floe consideration he hail given the subject from the papers they possessed, and after listening to the speech of the Noble Lord (Karl L.), and combining the two, lir thought them were great grounds for thinking that there was partiality sun the part of' Ministers in their proseredi4&:ltle the Allied Powers. The Nubile Lord opposite his speech •Iry chidiat his Noble leriend Marl Grey), fur laying great streets' on the date of the declaration of the Secretary for Foreign affairs on this subject. In reply to all that was urged against this part of the proceeding, he said that they had been bolding this langnage for a long time to the Austrian Conrt, and he also said that they conlol not' pub:isli the paper in question sooner. Mt' the thus.• at which this paper was published gave him (Lord Holland) strong groutids for suspecting the in-. elination of this (tips-crust:eta in the affair. The Noble Lord said, he was aware that the insinuation was, that' the paper 'was got up for the meeting of Parliament and he must emotes' that for :his own part he thought it hail very notch that appearance. The date of the paper was, the 19th of Jatincry. It professed to be in answer to a circular' hewed by the three Courts off Russia, Prussia, and Austiia. it was in answer to ai public paper from these Courts, expressing sentiments, not for the First time eipressed, and acted upon. it ''itras somewhat strange that at this peri,nl of time, re-' preatoilittion and remoisstraive should hare done so little, that it should be necessary so late as the t9th January, Illkit;to•sena forththlt tblie declaration the srittirisiots of the Mash more Milne that this Po6lie be masse tTtl when It *as of no*, l'he last linelVat there had heen , flOt4 op this shitieet, be realm: tared to rectinitiktie ibSi 'the between this n rhothent • asst • t , alidstlJ ba.i4 • llllii•thefitrme 't:entiirl4 it inner • - •104lieitk: i itrit` the • •it , •••_ Thumb. He new thought that these patio, 6 4 ' a dialogue from another quarter of a ria t il a( He now thought that one of these parties a r . , very like Sit Ch r ist o ph er Hatton,in The ritic," who thus addresses the gallant Raleigh " Tell me thou champion of thy cooitr's _ For there's squab - on *Weill still taint ask, & goooltioas "WA I.' Ild Willi s t geee mea ra n i thes sanst e armaments, er :e i ttY th "bilk itethn) rdelllgh . p. 44ti0di4 6 1,7-sktialltitAls cariosity, .har w he et k i ne t w hat it i. ; " l e Vi n his% play began *did not liitvehrixtepber ask thirhortrre, aa ji r elt* 0 :: 44 : 14_; tfo n re ht: t itir ;the ordienee did•not keow it ?"--(1 gh ig was the else with his. %jetty's thavertupent sal I L .Court of Austria. They 11114.1eutuoil each mho, 1 ,,, 1 .enough ; but Naples did oat. Parliament to about to to meet; the certain was about to des - (A laugh.)—This was another suagrines . ruiner for that paper, which mill, we took die a lf 6 rt o pp o rtunity of expressing oar opinion of the cu t i tai d circumstanCes in which th a t revolution took Are Thee were aelOsecty, as the Noble Lord to express their sentiments whenever tlity bet, if the Noble Earl was that lover of pr am a m neutrality which he professed himself est. league* to be, he would have told these stadiums* to the party moss coneerwed to know thee ',chute. MI they eotenstroleste their sentittreote on the subject is the Neapaltant? Nu ; it was only to that Pewit which ma most likely to make au acgressi os them en the strongsh of it. 'Fir Noble- Earl tall i w of his being a friend to nentraiity, and inn U h l boasted of this tioverum• nt being one of the cr ,.. 4 Constables and Keepers of the teener of Ennis,, tc., illnsttate this he would put n ease. Suppose Mo m acquainted wita a little v.-aim, week in beii; as s t Livid in diaporition And sni:pose he were ales sptainted with a :eta' bulky Pliow, of great c It reit snot of a most este rrelsonse, overbearing,jeehas temper, nei !thou rnf his t Ile fennel limn were to di) inlet It i tug to lois grd e to scempaaw his a boole, which he(l.ord i lollwasl)li new woullcallimi t the anger and disapprobation of his great built fried and he were to go to his bulky friend and say—"9u what this fellow has been doing ! lam come wWi issue's haste as I rould make, to tell you that Ilighlr disapprove of it, and that no matt can do snore thas I do;" at the same time. that hr (the overbearing Sas) should give orders to his porter nut to :Winn the-little man to the house, and make a resolution himself that he would never go near him, least he gave a satisfac tory explanation of leis conduct. Nhat WOlll.l Le thought of his partiality he should like to know, and,, such eirertmstaners ?—(Laughter.) Still more to, when having beard that the bulLy mats hail brat the weaker one with a great cudgel, he should tale as early opportunity to declare his anxiety not to prejtulpe the case, at the same time, snaking a speech, le cashes he should tell all that he knew to the discredit of little friend, since the commencement of their arquiet aneeship.—(Langhter.) He maintained that the.e were suspicious circumstances. What oorasion 113 S there for the Minister in that House to get ep and talk ahont abstract tiovermnent ? Why did he tale that trouble for the benefit of Austria? The Malec Austria bad pretty plainly told them, that he did sat w sat learning .sser learned men. tt I want, - said his Majesty. " good subjects. not learned men. ' AM this paper, concocted at the For Secretary's Otfirc, was drawn up with all its learning, with all its eke racteristir beauty of language, with all its cleatsets and precision for the sole purpose of pleasing stick men as this ! The Noble Earl ovposit• said, that he did not disapprove of a revoration beca woe an army hml taken part in ii. But he said, he did disapprove of it if it -originated with an army. Ile said, t.m, that he was ready to ad suit it, if achieved by competent authority; provided. the grievance to be remedied be complained of This doctrine of the Noble Earl, hr most conies., ap peared someirhat unintelligible to him. What was tie ssb,ect of all political revolutions To purify the Coo rerametot; and What Wad the grievance coompi Mod of in ail revolutions, if it was not the I i,oc..roincno es competent . Authorities, as they were eAlleft c 1/141 the Noble Kari, tarn, Illeall to say that the competent As diorites were-to put t hemselves forth as a pries-atm and revolt against themselves ? Ile hoped thut the late Revolution would operate 14.4 ;‘, w a r ning to N., starchy—and if it did not, he hoped they would o r rate as an .eansaple to their soldie7l an I suhjec s! — That was a feeling which every man who cherished li• herty in his heart lutist participate in. Ile could set help remarking on the delicacy of the Noble Karl* vane who was co 11/I%iutla not to prejudge the case, at the same time that he threw away the reasons srlsicii Austria Mad sooigneil for its conduct, and aultlemeit a new one. •He referred to that part of the NoMe Lord's speech which alluded to Sicily. What was the situation of Skil,- when the House of Bourbon was re stored to Naples ? The King came from Sicily with a Ceestitetion which he had sworn to and sanctioarc end of which he had derived all the advantage herordi 'and one of his first acts was to break that Constitution. The Noble Lord opposite, in the course of his speech, had touched upon the Carbonari. lie said he did not like the origin of the Orin/car . . He said •that' sestet societies were not sentient " monism to justify interferences ; lint if they were I , 't confined tb one nation, but existed in other nations. thew that wood!, be a fit subject to interfere with si.e xffaitar ofitnotiver crsentry in which a Revolution hid been accomplished by these Secret Serieties. He would toikailiaVe to /Mint out one fallacy in this 1WP 14606 the Noble Lord. 'The Noble Lord had roorfetanded all thregh that Which gave a right to forcible inter- Ilerereit:Oh'tliat which gave a right to remonatraßee- And One chair against Austria throtiodtout thewhok of their pruee•Atigs was, that she load never told the 'people of Naples what ',itemise'. it was she essinplainfe of, Pier neve 'indted )ter its retires' it : SO far them she was ibe ilcztlessor in the rewrite with Nsples- - . The 116ble Earle however. in the course of Ilia spree , s madelhe'cirenmstanels of the Cs:bon:or; • the Revolution. to be !hi' - t i .r---.lr--16::PMIX efenre, drove fdleir oppreio Tom 11 established a Übvsonment adopted at form of Ooveniusent *as nature, public declaration of an active part 4t the Neapolitan Revolution, to we "H - -11 Cabinet. it war thin. distit rubbed Mature between it and the Spankb Re- deelaration altould •uot: volution. OW lee (lAtrd Holland), had lward use to the weaker parts.' the Itirvolatiou:ol the Ndr-luil'h • A tim Y " 4 1"11;11: ten a earreciatiop In•this, abuqt by like Ihirbotaari. fin did not preteed ti,b 2 v membered that he !mai, 'sae* good ihlorthation utr t b r ;N o bie pat', bat he 11..4 '7e.rstraliKe flf tellfinkiutf, ketiliftis. - tire Kubla Earl 'raid. Oat if the Olii t tl 'the Aistrisirdpittitt pgrraidid sottittlies, that was a piss( of its jifi°'" dill°101 4 : 11 0 bej t . y. bad perhaps, : forgot ten when he nestle , s t t tither disreirkethil' tererisla ratibitlitarthe Proles/am Religo" , " 7 bThiasik by sorass.44 secret Nisei; i 4sions brohi b . .r• . . 4 le It ii tI r. t l t. )61 11 Rf .44 stn Lo S. cef hi