The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-07-12 00:00:00

so unjust or arbitrary that might not be justified less the whole case was brought before the - House at the same time, to enable a right he formed of its value, asdeserving to direct of proceedings in similar cases. His Lordshl remarked upon the precedent cited by the verpool on theprettedinrOvening, in the terbury,. Bishop of Rochester, and contended taking into view the whole of the proceedings in raw, the particular point ought not to have the force , of precedent. The Noble Berl had told them that At-' terbury had applied for copies of certain deposition... but had been •refused; but then it was necessary to keep In view that the defendant, with respect to the protieeding against him, stood in the situation of having the whole mass of evidence before him for which he applied, because the Bill bad gone through the Commons, and it was not likely that new papers hid been brought up. It was therefore necessary that the whole of the proceedir 4s should be known, If any were, that the House might know how far a single point was applicable. The examination of precedents ought. if worth any thing, to he complete. The Noose would not he dealing fairly by itself, if it al lowed a citation of precedent, which would he so con fined as to depeive Noble Lords of the means of 'seer- Lain* the real value of the case from which the w hat information was extracted. He must, therefore. give hie vow against the motion. The Earl HA encase said, that although all suck measures by Mill of Attainder, and Bill of Pains and Penalties, were different from one another in every other r-speet, yet they all agreed in this, that in no one instance was an application of the kind which the petition contained agreed to. lie did not say there might not be such a rase as would properly form an exeeptiaa ; but then it was right that their Lordships should loom what was the usual practice in cases par taking of a judicial character. lie would therefore propose a■ aureminient to the motion, to include the caw of impeachment, that the course with respect to roaninusicating a list of witnesses should be known by precedent drawn from every kind of judicial pro- Lied Iliu.t.s,ro objected to the amendment, for the same reasous which be bad urged against the original biotion, and observed, that neither precedents from the practice of the House, nor legal analogies, were to be adopted as coin-tinier, in a ease like the present, un less it eo:tld he shown that they were conducive to the cods ()Oust's... The reason of the case, and the just treatment of it, were the paramount considerations ; and wherever a precedent or an analogy was followed in such a case, it was not because it was a precedent, but because reason and the interests of justice required its adoption. The EArl of L tUDERDALL said, that his object in niskiog the motion was, that the precedents ;night be ro.lured, to give au opportunity of arguing them. It wAs his own opinion, that • list of witnesses ought to In furnished to her Majesty; but still the proceedings would strike more forcibly on the public mind, if the precedents were given. If the precedent was a bet one, lie was sere his Noble Friend (Holland), with all the information which he possessed on those subjects, could effectually oppose it. Lord Aui at.ssi agreed with his Noble Friend near him (Lord Heliand) in his view of the question, and would vote against the motion. Ile was sure their Lordships wished to do substantial justke, hat they should not have commenced In a manner unprecedented and anomalous, and then look for precedent. It was nes reasary that every information should be given to lane Majesty which could serve to her defence, and the means of information cook' nut he complete unless list of triunes was communicated. Their Lordships sailit sillier to hare one regnlstr and precise abode of pruceeding whkh they could all understand and be bouod by, or else they should be guided by the cir cumstances of the case, considering only how far the proceeding applied to them was compatible with the spirit of * just investigation. The House thou divided upon the amendment— Contests Non-Contents - Majority for the motion es amended - —8 The Heise ales adjourhed to this day. HOUSE OF COMMONS, TLISDAT, JOLT 11. Oolosel Woetnocen brought op the Report of the Select Committee appointed to inquire into the merits of a petition, complaining of an undue election for the borough of Oraethant, which stated, that James Hughes. Beg. was not dnly returned. The !Oxman was directed to issue a new writ ac cordingly for that borough. Colonel Wonanouas then brought up a special Re port froin the same Committee, which stated, that James Hughes, Esq. had been bound guilty of treating, sad bad given several sums of money to raters by way of indemnity for expenses, which incapacitated him, ac:ordiug to the Statute of William 111. frouseorring in Fir;lament, such a practice being subtend,* of tw fro colons of election. "T4' Df. Pntu.o oar gape notice or a reassess= am sow • **Sort for to-morrow (this day). ' UPPER CANADA.—Sir J. MAcstrurose saki, hit lad a petition to present from Mr. Robert (Marley, a Bcceit Gentleman, who had settled himself in Upper Callieda. The matter of the petition was two-fold, =I and public. Under the first part of the pe lt appeared that there was a local Act ig Upper the provisions of which wont even further Asa those of the Alien Bill. They allowed the Go yim* of the province to banish out of the piorince i i a l i p s= who was sot • settled inh a bitant of the making no distinction between natural born others; and Imposing heavy penalties for • Under this law, Mr. Gourley, who me that his Alai bad been much oleander !Pidteniustaiitted, bad been imprisoned and finally ant Set of the reentry. He hardly knew whether Hein was ft this Emitter tot a motion in the House, elites k-wmr considered drat the law' la question was se • ire, dostert• the attention of the British At Io the psi& matter of the petition, Mi iniessitelldweiteek ellitrietioes on landed trimrtrty, Wag tends/ to reedit that provisos till to hi as Albs Arils !Weigel talsibltants of this country, NI 'Ohl& lives otherwise moo suitable. le the opi eke of lhoillelleser. dos soy other grislier of the , = l, ne(gltl. M.) woad lot absolutely pledge Is Meg this object before the House by a . of ..- Lord Bissitto said, the case bad beers ender con sideration. OPHTHALMIC INSTITUTION.—Mr. BENNET amid ha had to correct a osisreprrientation %hit+ af- fected himself, and which had appeared in a Paper otherwise very respectable, The .11uraing l'Arueark.— He was surprised this morning to find a long speech attributed to his Hon. Friend the Member for Cork (who had only uttered two or three sentences, and not one word of what was attributed to bile), on the Oph thalmic Institution. It was stated in that speech, that lie (Mr. Bennet), bad declared that the statement whirls he had made on a former occasion was erroneous. lie should not have allowed his Hon. friend to have made such an assertion without cut reefing him. He had etracted any statement rrspec:ing Sir W. Adams's plan of treatment, becalm he had never given any opinion on a matter of which hr was an Invest petent judge. lie had merely stated un a former oc-1 casion what was perfectly correct, that there was difference between medical anth•aritirs as to Sir W. Adams's plan. He had stated yesterday, that he had visited the Ophthalmic Institution; that he had seen WI patients ; that of these three only plained; aid that he was induced to think, by the explanation of the Surgeon of the institution, an intelligent young man, that their complaints were errowous. Mr. lieNstay moved for an account of the number of persons confined in the Fleet fur contempt under Exchequer process. • PRIVILEtiE.—Mr. R. MARTIN said, he had on a former occasion mentioned to the House, what appear ed to him to be a wilfnl tnitrepresentation of what he had said, in The Morning flereld.—lle had at that time expressed a hope, that the person who reported for that paper, would not tronble himself to report what he (Mr. M.) said in future, a , :d that if be did, he would do it correctly. lie hail applied to the person who had thus misrepresented him, who mitl him in A supercilious way, he was ready to give him any satis faction that a gentleman could d eman d. li e (Mr. M.) had declined this trial by battle, whereupon this per son said, " you shall have no cause fur complaint in future, for tee shall never report any thing you say." He was sorry this determination haul been departed from, fur in The Morning Henri , ' of that day, he saw sentiments attributed to him which could only come, frotn.the inhabitant of an asylum for ideots. The ac -1 count given of this speech was this Mr. Martin) (of lialway), compared the opposition Gentlemeu who were attacking the Ministers for the purpose af getting into their places, to a big-bellied hackney coachman whom he once met in Paris, who spoke in the most disrespectful terms of the King of France, and said he himself would make a better King if put in his place." lie moved, that J. Robeson and T. P. lilaisingtutt, the j printer and publisher of The Aforniv Heteld, do at- I tend the House on Friday.—Orderrvl. The Irish Fisheries, the Naval Prize Money, the Royal Ramily, and the Irish Excise Licenses Bills, were severally read a third time and passed. PETITION.—Mr. lixxszz presented a petition from John Drake, the Cominander of a transport for the conveyance of convicts to New South Wales. The [ease of the petitioner was this :—ln the course of the voyage a mutiny arose in the ship, in consequeNce of which the guard fired on the convicts, II or 12 of ' whom died in consequence. When he arrived at New South Wales, he had been treated ignominiously by the tiovernor. His condnet hail been inquired into by a Commission, consisting of the Police Magistrate, the Judge Advocate, and the Governor's Secretary.— Though the Comn.ission decided that there wos uo ground for proceedings, the llovernor'■ Secretary hay ing dissented from their decision, and having had the ear of the Ouvernor, Captain Drake was sent home to take his trial, with three convicts, who received' a free pardon to give evidence against him (lone of whom had since been hanged, and two transported for new crimes). On the trial It was declared by the Judge' that !Isere was not a scintilla of evidenCe in support of the prose cution. Captain Drake had, by 'these proceedings, been put to an expense of 7001., for which he haul only received 2901. compensation from the tiovernment, but what he especially complained of was, that he had bees refused the sum which was allowed for taking out the convicts safe, to obtain which, it was necessary to hate the certificates of the Surgeon, the Trat..port Board, and the tiovernors. The certificates of the two former he had, but Governor Macquarrie refused his. Bewared that the petition be brought up. Mr. flocinoalt contended, that under the einem stanc.,s of the ease, Governor Mariptarrie had no dis cretion. but was obliged to send home Captain Drake for trial. As to the sus paid when prisoners were sately landed It New &filth Wales, it was 'widest that the question, whether this sum should be paid, was eery different from that, whether Captain Drake bad bees guilty of murder. Mr. Ilrx ysr contended that there was not the slight est ground of blame against Captain Drake. A discussion arose as to the regularity of receiving the petition, which was finally laid on the Table. Dr. Pumustoas presented a petition from A. Jar vis, expressing his contrition for his offence.—ile was ordered to be brought up to-morrow to be discharged. QUERN'S COUNSEL Mr. autpuoosm said, tbat there were twe Standing Orals the Hesse, whirls prohibited the attendance of its as Counsel in the Home of Leeds. Om of sheds the attendance of ambers at the liar 4 of Lords on Appeals sod Writs of &reg, the referred to Sahli press through thS tipper Hersh MOW slate 1710, the Medias lir ders se hr as asepested law proceedings, h i g mbi ldis.l reiparded. as 1611116110 of the Home were hil the Iseattirklibeg on limb badness as *dem the' slier . Wlthirespert I. Bills is proves. Ulla *her . the. cu bad hers different; the Stash lag Order of dee - Wens lied hots attended to. It seas manifestly a senresiesee to the Members of: g Noose , that ainsM net he liable to be called 'to attend ei all Milk es they might be if they attended elef Ml ia Ml i s by the ethwasee se essential- to the m h o. deesesesi so are 'meld rem a brief is the Vogyl. Asi prosibmls mg the Order was essibi se me ref a lailetscieg the 14' f ! ' no Obey of Lee Hoiessiold, the effect of the Bill at the sainsalase being to prevent her from ever having and Honiehold. The other high party concerned had in that House his Ministers and the Officers of his Household, while her Majesty had no owe in the situation of a be minee in an Election Usemittoe,liartly Advocate, porde Judge. He should move, therefore, that the Wads Attorney. and Solicitor-flesseals he allowed to Masud the House of lords on the Bill now pending reepeetkAr eh er Majesty. He had to state , that if that ha he coold not at all anticipate, that the Kitrr it' ould come down from that House, they (the Queen's Counsel) would have to request not to be permitted to vote on it. He wished the permission to auend the Lormli to be li mited to the particular Bill, and accompanied with a de claration, that it should no wise be drawn into precedent. Lord eAaTIARILAOII snggested that notice should he given of the motion, that tuna might be had for AlM bees to turn the subject in their minds. Mr. Knot:alum said, he bad imagined this application would have been treated as a matter of course. Indeed if it was not, no Member could attend the Lords on writs of error, which was equ ally contrary to the Standing Order. If his application were refused, he should move that the Standing Order in the case of all Conoael Members of the House. Mr. IVram said, there was a difference in the two ori ginal Resolutions containing the Standing Orders; one of them prohibiting Members from attending the House of Lords without leave, the other containing a prohibi tion without any mention of leave.. lie thought, under all the circumstances of the present case, the application should he granted. Mr. linnuouto hoped he should not be required to postpone his motion beyond to-morrow (this day). After a few words between Mr. WYNN *lid Mr. B11101:41111.31. Lord CASTLERIAGN said, he wished it to be under stood that he saw no objection to the application, but ;visited time to consider it, as the Standing Orders were quite new to him.—Notiee for to-morrow (this day). Sir F. BURDETT observed, that the King's Attorney fieneral, who had been ordered to attend the Lords, was is the *Ante situation as the Queen's Counsel. EDUCATION BILL—Mr. Bsovonam brought in the Education Bill, which was rend • first time. On moving that it be read • second time, Mr. Bessibans said that he sighed to have the blanks filled op Wore ssy, that under the means of The barrack in any erection doubt preened opp?rtuaity a wish that e his motion. r thought it incumbent pronottnee some decision upon &direct attempt to supersede its no disposition whatever to act of the Barrack Department, he ply with the Right Hon. lientlanale his motion. The "trauma of the EICIIMQVIM stood that the Inspector of the Barrack had some communications with the ' sury with respect to the con►truction alluded to. Notice was entered of Mr morrow. Colonel Dims postponed his , the victualling of troops, convicts lonies. SIR MANASS RH LOPRZ.—Lord J. pursuant to notice, to move an Address for shortening the imprisonment of Sir SI Noble Lord, In proposing to recomiuead of mercy to this Gentleman, disclaimed whatever to impeach the sentence tation upon the Judges. The pleaded for a mitigation of the Sir M. Lopes wakat present far a... about 64 years of age, and imprisonment period as two years must he deemed a fiction upon such a man, comprehending least one-fifth of the time that - expected to remain in existence. had also paid Ten Thousand Pounds be considered that from the Cornwall Boroughs, as well as which that practice was talked mot improbable that the prisoner's have been misled, and that instead ware guilty, he should rather frithan others. Having ' n t so ry nths in prison, he submit., cue he has stated, the prisoner was &proper ehject clemency of the Crown. The Noble Lord co with moving an Address to the Throne, proving his Majesty would be graciously pleased to ;bonnie period of Sir 111. Lopes's imprisonment, in met - his 1 .....- i -I , 4- ~ AL ^...."4 - Ant— 4 0 - THE STATESSiAN -„, ..__ oa .' i, - Au - — .4 , - flie l Zar lli A * 1.. ustifted : un- motion for a COmtrittett in Ole neneSes'ions hit if ;lee If Members ea* Private Bills, the door being, in the understood hint to as! r view of the brought tim subject of i'artail under consideration, it opinion of witty, quite wide enough opin to that Iti ‘ toff racks was of course c judgment to would be with a view to the examination of these re - a influence. The proposition be had now to make was by which alone the vet the course arrietions.—Ordered to lie on the table. la respect to the case of a Hill now pending in the could be furnished. 1 Lords. He should propose that an exception should b e tul l e a w a re of th i s i ordship then Sir J. Mseatwrosti moved, that the petition of Sir made front the Standing Order with respect to this Hill, touic, and would no de to Earl of Li- H. Dorringtoo be printed, and suggested the considera- in behalf of the Queen's two Law Officers. This appli- in order to afford an , ease of At- Hon of this gentleman's case to Cie Hoard of Controul cation was rendered necessary by the situation in which subject, he expressed nded that by or the Court of Directors of the India Compile,. her Majestr was placed by the Introduction of the Bill her would postpone hi at... ;,,, Are Lord BINNING said_ the ease bad been under con- , into . the other House, where else had no Law O ffi cers and , Mr. CA LCRAFT thou' ..• • • -a •N__. -• .1-- 411111 _..t_ - .. .. .. ..... .. .tit_ If i l l • # the I►ting7 ese 1114114 le controul of Parham,. of defraying the rack drilartinent wog rectiou they at 41. .: reed with due canasta" • nity for ingniry hat the llonouraM ncumbent on the Row. hi 10 this affair, as it inie'ri its functions. Bat Da t harshly towards thea m i e had no ohjectios to su b dentate. wish ID pip e KCHEQVICR said. hush, • t Barrack Dept/twit 114 eh' t h e L or d s of the Tres. struction of the Mi m s r. CALCILIPTII motive to his motion with ricts and others .—Lord J. Rresau to, to Address to the Car l cut of Sir IL Lopez .ecoutitiend the elm.. Reclaimed any intim% race or to cast any isp 'be considerations did te sentence were thee. far advanced is life, bang impri‘onment for saris deemed a very severe is. nprrhending as it did, at ,1 he could naturally le ce. Sir Manasseh Up Pounds line. It witab, j . e general practice is the t as from the amut, dof in that flout j, 1011eT . 11 jedgmest Shia ostrad of Wig er be coadiend t e t thea bees already artily itteel, that oil the greeds t ,R Thmeant. e ANOILboa clew ' mai upon public the - deprecated premed reprel4e.. meet it .a►.s4 That attend , - rased takes barracks --" •-- -- -•—•- .---- --- ---- ---- -r ••••-•-• ; peruse of err as. uopes s imprisonment s ea anew the discussion was taken on the PrioeiPle °f the Ha ear ' and at such time, as his Majesty might Ilit He wished now to rectify some mistakes which had got I t w ' • abroad as to the objects of his Hill among too highly re- • r .° P er * spectable bodies, the Roman Catholics and the Protestant 1 Mr. C. irTNY, from an imperative sense of at?, Dissenters. In consequence of the connection in tire, waist observe, that the House could not, medepily , Hill between the Schools and the Ecclesiastical Este. , with its own judgment and dignity, mesa blb blislinemt. some members of these bodies had so fat l i aeotion of his Noble Friend. To whom was it parsed taken alarm, that he had been applied to by their t b great merry in this case ? Why, to an bedlam! ' and even counsel of the Catholics, to know w be ' who Med convicted of IS acts of bribery, wad whp intended to force Roman Catholics to send their chile! I itismeeqmsee of that conviction, was hese& yllt ' dren to Protestant schools; and by Dissenters, to know 1 whether he intended "to root oat the last remains of judgment at the instance of the House itself. Thii religious liberty." For the mistake of the Roman . acts of bribery, too, of which the prisoner was u Catholics there was no foundation. As to religious ' victed, did not, it must be recollected, tabs phe liberty be begged to say, that he bad always shown his pending the beat of an election contest, but mai& opinions on that subject by his votes on the Catholic berately and advisedly done, not for the put she * and Test questions; that he was an enemy to all tests. - i curing the election eat the pr isons, klbeelf, bee horde not absolutely necessary for the safety of the establish. went; and especially was the last man to edema*. the ; to tt'aefat the Borough of ° " ells at maintenance of the testa as they sew were. He had in 1 el his own sinister ends. But, ef thy the Bill, as it was sow framed. omined the sacramental considerations, he was adverse to the t • test for schoolmasters, which even some members of the ~' motion, because be could net approve of any establishment objected to. The Hon. Member derlared, l on the part of the Home to arrogate hashes= that nothing could be farther from his intention than to 1 didnot properly belong to it. It would met, in ili infringe the rights or offend the feelings of that respect. I able, and by him, infinitely respected body, the Dissenters . view' become the House to interfere so bath with it of England, who were long known to be among the m o st • Executive Department of the State, anti aretutti 1 4 0 ardent friends of civil and religions liberty, while their the administration of public justice. moral habits, and loyal disposition towards the Constitu. Mr. W. Pan spoke in favour of the moth" all tion of the country, entitled any wish they entertained I urged , rand that th to the most attentive consideration. But he hoped that te toihir. o same swaon measure of mercy await those eitinsable persons would feel satisfied with the al- ' g, ~ I L ew d ..AIPTLIMIAGII observed, that it would MK teration he had made in the Bill before the House. 4 Ur. W. SMITH concurred with his Hon. Friend who i'beesulle the House to leasethe Preragative ef 111411 had just sat down. in the surprise which he had esprit's- where it was fixed by the Constitution ; for the air 1 eil upon the apprehension which some Catholics pro- I tion of one ease would naturally bring forth aerie fessed to entertain, that it was meant through this Bill 1 a n al a t l eng th, it might be deemed a me Open. to erect schools to which Catholic parents should bit! •"s ect i on apes any Individual Mark the obliged to send their children to learn Protestanism. But or the law n apt to . .4 havehis case brought fat. th he must say, that a great alarm prevailed musing the Dissenters in consequence of the constriction of his Hen. sion in that Home. But the Nob l e Lewd ha Friend's Bill. As he was shout, in a few days, to pre. charged what he coateived to be his duty, le seat a petition from a great body of Die ent e rs, praying hoped , be induced to withdraw his 1111•0114. .W k for the total repeal of th e Test Act, thel es em se nenerally , might be satisfied that the individual misessd is add ohjert to the proposition of the Hen. 'II Bill I not be is; tills discussion rased ea a len advonledetaa to estend the test to the sehookaamell strutted under : f oot i ng t h ee h e stee d h e l m . the Act. According to hie eenviethes, which was sus- •ld die goodm tamed he the opinion of eireq , friend to religious liberty S ir T . nC/114" with whom be had conversed or communicated upon the Mr. Osamer pleaded fee Mr. Sass. subject, this Bill should not be allowed to pan in its Sir J. YORIII also ter i ed et t mitigedee of di NU' present shape, or without undergoing a very-'material knee against Mr. Swam, whose deliequemeillw le* diti:o.ion. Without such modilleation, iedeed. neither was light indeed coeipamil to that of Sir ii. lie himself, nor the great body of the Dissenters of Erg. Yet th e N a m e Mover, t h oug ht proper to peed* . land, conbl ever be reconciled to its adoption. gooee to the Sour—(A laugh)—inhmieg he The Bill was read a first, and ordered twits read a 1 second time to-morrow. ' ties of the nobler bird into the weaker-4A NEW BARRACKS.—Mr. Couleur, said. that he Messrs. BaowsLow and MONET Sapplielfi *Pi felt it his duty to call the lion, and Mr. Aseacaoles. spoke efaktalio. ', • matter which very mesh ee........._ __ 1r ef the was. House it to i peered, from what t , Mr , CAXIVIWO said, that if the Noble Lea , ~... 7 - ' Exchequer said' posed that any impediments existed in the it'ar • last night, that he v . — a * .la Mary- fair seesisimation Of the came( the ludividlef be le-bone Park, to I. , were behalf dila motion was made, he must feel Aside actually building was t° °tat° impediment was effectually removed by whet Il i that the bandbox - NMI awe ',Arse ;• w-tet weeks ago at least,' it ir"P - ... lb i „,,,,, s h o w y passed in the course of the present discuss io n. nearly sel. Gh i a . Meese wee esee ti tio Sir J. Maw/moss concurred with the Ili tioaaily u to held lime parawstriag of the pub- I Gentleness opposite t and as there appeared to ie is lie mosey, it was to inquire by whose as ' understanding, that dee consideration would be fie. rity the expendliture a =sessey had been entered ime to t h e me o f Sir id etleine h L o p es in the pier without its " Iteti°ll ' Wawa* I nn a Paint much quarter, he hoped bis Noble Friend would be WW I more material to be than even the mum of 70,000/. which it was said dm evades of these barracks to withdraw his math). * would cost the country; for it that nom , "„.. I Lord J. KUPuLI. said, If be understew i l = l son bad undertake, to expe n d r etie money, not meet et the Noble Lord, this csa, was only without the eased°. of Parliament. bat eves with- 1 der comiderathe.—(No, no ! from the out the sanction of the Bused of Treasury. It would be 1 beribee.).-1 be Noble Lord bad said, skit eI w recollected that the Meagre Committee had remarked , without this motion the same esse id eee des walla upon the armature of a kw than 0 minim of the ; public emery at dillweet has, without dee rib resee to 1 via to the case of Slr Mammoth Loyeli alli Y I rum, J. Russell) Was satiallid "with this deelemilh' the authority of Paellimeeekend that seek a precties me deprecated as quite Masemillutionral, a ro bje bet _I He bad certainly sever boasted to lay, that 1 ,0 5 . premed that care west IS him to ' is ordisary ease it *veld be proper hr this $ repetition. Be he trusted ihefeees a comelier whether mercy ought or ought set SO. ..... 6 meet due ankeedaniee. The seems widish _,deeds bet this was a ease a which the it proper te rasa, with a view to bring_this ra- d ee N ew were ree it ie l y i oe ,,i ee d. se e m 010 0 gothrty seder the mesaildereffee of the 'Rase mom • have mome. That the Head et tee Barrack Deportees; should Hits"' therefore, imi lr bt r e r eti L t e !ro aimed at the hoe a the H aw . is min to be i mam _ Mkt what had hike from the Maki gated e l s to the isthesity ruder white he ImiLender- balm ho giemehata to "'idedese . his mdse. • tithes to ammeters or premed is the oresiine mis likve 1100111k)lf DYNASTY IN BOUM barracks alluded ...-.411. ilea. hostimilia ms- the ad . ..' Deetireesesem me, is paremea of ; modine,y eliffea.. The Guraneete,es oy the k eeenee g e Ro h e u p so dew which he gave, a mere Ise a eery 01 say 0 , areashat we meld um distinctly beer fine; bat we neimilwelewn 'visaed 'alt a aelPeisdeat bid " . . " I I - I , . , i r 4 li I