The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-01-27 00:00:00

r, —~. ~.. --•ia~' ~ .~:~. - r, ether place, a Tote had been passed upon the analogs, or, at least, which was held to be the of that House on her Majesty's conduct, es affil of the evidence at the trial, and his quostifts Noble Lord was, as to the effect which was IA ed to be iven to that vote. If they looked aj, it as a final verdict or judgment, why did At afterwards abandon sad give up the MU Am. if it was not in the nature of a i i nfireat apes her, whrdld they sot restore her a esty's cases le the Liturgy. And, seriously speaking, this last measure, so much to be deprecated in all re spects, did lot affect the Queen alone, bat would be ie. jerks& to the Crown sad the interests of all the Royal Family? For he west ask, so what principles were prayers et all offered up for the Royal Family Was it foe any personal qualities, or superior snsdowseuts?—(Hear.)—Was it not rather because they were of the Royal Family ? And to whose benefit would, it tend to introduce the doctrine of making comperleens, who *sold be served by excluding certain iteembers of the Royal Family on account of the abseil* a penmen! endowments?--(Hear.)—He, therefore, warmed Mi. • slaters against introducing the principle, for no use &mew where It was likely to stop. The Noble Lord then rdes.took occasion to censure the iatrodoctiott of poli tic% into the sermons of Ministers of the Chapel ip the Church of Clod. Hut, again, he would ask the Noble Lord, if he meant to take the vote of the other House as a judgment on the Queen, how far each adodgeneet bore an analogy to a judgment in a Court of Law? Who bed, ever board, that whets a matter was referred-to Jags& . and a ansionty of the Court bsiog agreed upon the course to be taken, that the whole should bo then sod deftly and unaccountably abandoned. The Noble Lord had said, they did not mean to carry the matter any farther arainst the Queen, bat what could Ministers do? They were entitled to no credit for their forbearance, for they had already done ail that they could against her t and even now, in the lest hour, they asked the House to argue the legal gees tion with them. And were they not, to this moment, *falsifying a portion of the Frew; to give vent to the most pdioas slanders against her t Bet after all, what elect had these measures prodneed on the public mind ? He would ask the Noble Lord whether the multitude of petitions, presented towight, spoke the sentiments of the people, trod where these feelings were ? Was it not a certain fact, that, from one end of the country to the other, tr general—nay, universal feeling prevailed, that her Majesty had starred mach injustice from the steps taken against her, and to treat that feeliag with can dour, every party should admit that itdid not arise from the oppesitioa to the measures of Ministers, but because they thought her permeated, and that she lad for protection to them. Rot as a matter of pular:retrieve meet, he asked, were the HOliffe of Parliament to be perpetually taken up with the discussions of this ques tion? Was it not enough that six months of the public time had been already squandered 'away : and was the House se inditiereat to, or did they sympethise so little with time distresses of the country, that they should spend months together upon it, to the exclosion of every other subject whatever ? In private life he was sure, the Noble Lord and his colleagues were too honiterable not to admit that the country ought not to be so treated. Uis opinion was, that they must have gives some pledge to prosecute bee Majesty, is ease she came to *hie country. They gave it upon as understanding that abe would sever come to this country. and he was sure sowearetted it. Hut, os the ether band, he irbeiher it ' ' Mir' who erasu►e AMU's IMAM was nib and their eon tisaing keep her excloded was still mere so.— Nothisig, as it appeared to him, could warrant them in ibis coarse, bet a muse that the vete of the House of Lords was is effect a jadgment, and amounted to a conviction of the Qom,. Their repeated. ill-ad vised, and unjust acts hail brought the country to a crisis, and until the Hoes* took the affair Wu WWI bands, and visited their asalversations with their popes, rev aril, good order sod good feeling wadd sot be re stored. Ile wished to table the thieg bar steps, mid with that view he began with the oasissionof her same which was in effect the _principle injury done is th e beg inning to time Queen. His motion, theref o re, w as , " That it is the sense of thin House, that the order of Council of the 12th of Feb., by which the omission of her Majesty's name in the Liturgy was occasioned, waspost ill-advised and ineapedieat." Mr. C. K. ELLIS was induced to offer one or two observations in consequence of the allmsioss which had been made by the Noble Lord to the absence and re . aigaativu of his friend Mr. Canning. Mr. Canning had takes as early opportunity of declaring that he wield take no part in the proceedings against the Queen. And from the time that all hopes of as ad-; justment failed, by the miscarriage of the address of the House to her Majesty, be withdrew himself alto "ether, and left the Kingdom. but be mimed after the Hill of Pains and Penalties was withdrawn. Fuld tug thee that the new 'tato of things approached too nearly to that which he bad objected to. be became esamilde theta contingence in office was incompatible with hie format professions, hue though Mr. Canning haillAtladrawa himself from office, he did net, by any twos wish to shrink from the responsibility which attathrti is his colleagues.—(Neat.) Mr: SUllialSON 'mild have resat before, to vied'. east his friend, Mr. Canning, from the aspersions of title Kbalk Lad. bat that, la courtesy, he bad beets 'Wed to yield the plasm to soother. The Noble Lied had WC that Ministers were now called open to do. *ad messires which possibly they had never advised.' ikhatever would be the eonsequeoce of discharging WIWI( from the indulgence which this circumstance wised is give Ministers, be disclaimed it altogether.' — (Hear.)—Whittovot advice was given, was given by ' Ministert, they alone were respirasibie for the coo- 1 sequences of it.—(Load crier of bear, hear !)—lt was a Nttle odd, dial if Ministers had committed illegal sets—had insulted their Queen, abused the confidence K their Sovereign, and brought the country to a state approaching revolution, that the Noble Iced would in list iso ether resort than a slight mark of reprehen- sioa.—(Hear.)—The Noble Lord had properly avoided teaching en the legal questioies, foe in truth his MO main* would carry but little oatidemisa with k the House. There were ethershetter *desisted thili the Noble Lord to afford the House information es that sukect. For his part be had the strongest soarictloo. tin* ali the actawhich they had done were strictly le., indeed be was at a lose to see bow It mild be argued that it was set so. her if tbs Act ei Vague.. adig made it imperative ow the Meg imeesesU to put. ia she *meats oasse, is eight Ss follow that the same eldigathee wee harm/4 ea flit a 4 It° a l l tlhl r e C l are, OF•6• 4 7.--(lhat. . IMO" I that tie Crow. a redone/ tower Rader that Act. Lad treating the Natter caw- dicily. it tars; La la theLikargy. - witheut also raking late &emits all the elreaseetasicee which preceded and accompanied that advice. It was well knows that their MOretits had lipid separate for years—that th e se p ara ti oa h a d WOW some Inman auctioned by theist. Kingoind recognised by more than one Act of the Le Ail that Ministers had to do, was to make asN a sip raugentent as suited the interests of both parties, aid which he now emafeseei was all along founded on tie express ouderstandiag that her Majesty was to 4lne abroad, and that she was to forego the exercise elf those rights which ahead the enjoyment of SD exalted a situation.--{Loud cries of beer, hoes.). Looking. thee, at the question in this light, they bad medeubt but that their proposition to her would bt acceded to; and if it had, in what a situation woe Ministers be placed, if they bad sneered bar Majesty's name to stand ha tha Litargy..(Mear !)—Aad they, were also sensible that, one day or ether. the opt would be brought before the House ; and they sallicient proofs in their hands to warrant the et sion of her Majesty's name.--(Hear !}—Now they, G.,uld Minister% confer a personal honour on the Q by restoring her name to the Liturgy, under . tbecir atm!e/s which be hatabeetieeed. Had flea tisi beditTosperatire, it would have relieved liiiiineen from a great difficulty. It world hare bee. more gremlin to have no din..-retioo. Ministers were touvesid by the proofs they had in their hands, to brine* Qu. to trial.---(Loud cries of hear !)--tienttemen might* incredulous, but he was nut now going into a eiatilea- Lion of the measures which Ministers had taken. • Al a proper time he sad his colleagues wosfd meet the Mouse on the subject, and not shrink from the tweet eatiefactory itiplanation.--(Hear o—lie th 'nit It "would be more cruel to give her Majesty a palace bete pad at the same time deprive her of her just rights. It was Ministers whis gave the advice. sod they alone were responsiltie. If they committed a Mae, they ought to be severely punished for it. If Ministers. after haviag betrayed the Sovereign, and insulted the Queen, were suffered to escape with impunity, it would be the worst omen for the civil liberties of Ibis country that ever happened.----(Bear, hear !) The present motion told nothing. It was not manly *Rough. to pass a censure on Ministers, and instead of ca lla! for the restoration of her Majesty's name to the Liturgy, it only called upon the House to express an opinion upon the Impropriety and expediency of omitting it. A motion from a Noble Lord over the way might to take the precedence of it, as that would raise the question upon its merits. The present could be only intended to catch up a few votes by a side wind manoeuvre. But then great stress has been laid upon the Petitions presented to the House. That these petitions were genuine he did not deity, but whit did they ask the House to do--not to dis miss Ministers, or to censure them, hut to restore her Majesty's name to the Litergy..eilhav, bear!) — As' a would ask in what way was this to ho dose, or it be des* in sow ether way this by an athlete, to It 'radii be a personal affroutnpoo the Noble Lord said, diet his ' F iat flat without d at least c fill sgs of the Noose of language to be used on so moment outs a subject as the present ? He coatenileti that its was sot the proper mode of conveying the feelings the House of"Comnions to the foot of the Throne, and that if Ministers bad acted in the very criminal way is which their conduct was represented, the House of Cm* moos were bound in duty to take other steps than sli reprimands. On all these grounds, therefore, and nose the proposition was not a fair and manly one, rather a collateral issue upon an abstract twilit, wh ittleuld not involve the case one way or the ether, he *odd oppose the motion, and the faintest way he thought of meeting it, was by moving that the floe. do now adjourn. Lord A. HAMILTON explained. Mr. HOBHOUSB began by saying, that he agreed ontirejy_with that .Hon. fienileman . who spoke hefor!. s th e at p wi r t t h u re ni f y ar o d f t d o e M fen r. d t in a g nn b t i n ni g ite , he t s be ho r r f l e l teare made upon him. But whether he svne or wet. or whe the r he was absent or present. a • to hie in the present state of things as of very I the , and the House should not be occupied, with iscessions.—(ilear.) lie hoped the col leagues of that Right Hon. (lent. would Tare the dis interestedness to mark their abhorrence of a measnrr in consequence of which he resigned his office. The Right Honourable Uentlenran who had just spoken, had never given an excuse for, or offered a palliation of the acts of the Ministry. Ile declined entering into the legal question, at the same time that he made a motion for adjourning the House. He (Mr. Heldman) was no lawyer, but he thought metre prohondi lay with Ministers to show that their acts were not illegal. He was not obliged to do so. Every lawyer knew well that there was no law for rhasging the formula of prayer; and, from the year 1346, to the present time, there was no instance of a Queen Coosa/Is' name being omitted, under the same the present. There was. indeed, —the Queen (Jenson of George was hardly analogous to the present, sokisown to thopeopie of this roue or Ptincess a u ales; sad if she ' for, it was because she was not lu sons who ltlegeentod the Court no port of the King's family, so sonotry were enabled to judge. be gaming examples. He toold • of the Stagg, could be possibly got 'sprout' , said, tbat alterations might ' as occasion required, but no where aim. The Hoe. Hest. then proceeded way in which the Qoeen's trial had ' charge against her being supported, the evidence of the lowest wretches. one of them. Bianca, who was a fell , rum, at Yealee.—(Lond cries of , stied time, there was any State necessity ing; awd if there was, it was incumbent on the Mialsi tees to shnw it. The responsibility lay be them, to skier why the emigstny bad keg as long kept it a state at agitatioo; and it was for them% explain erkv they .0w rejezted the petitions of -Olso.gnsple. if they felt thews selm hound by any point of Ansioor to oilier. to Kiehl present system, it would be snob more manly in theme to gi ve it up. and act dime the principle of that titt4 which the Home bad agreed to during the NM sosekris, on the si}lieet of tbe paiimediags this cheat tobp toted usenet her Majesty. gralieria the set of the Mielefetesllllll Mt What he awned the IpIWO MI dee% _ as for the perpooe of heels" is iefeensitiesi lid Indere the Hasse as should noel* del priseipb be viand to lay decent se clear that wow maid dotty the tenth OIL The lies. Getnieman who now mewed thequeeticia if adjearemeot, mast net thick that he could avoid a quoin which itemised is it the right of-every Queen Ceeenet .liffd—a jeteetion, sot miming-to ono, bates I whoever did or whoever might bereeller " ad tat high rank. The questioa was of no lees Impedance than this—whether the law of the land Invented the Goverment with power to erase the name of the Quetta Consort from the Litur gy oldie Church; aid it waits fallacy to suppose that • ease of this kind mild be laid down on say except a general principle, which was, that according to the Com m/dude Res at, the name of the eases Consort bad always ;bean placed in the Limo alootwitb that of the King, cad that it could net be ramrod therefrom at the plea itore of the Exectatire Government ; and therefore whet ter, decision the Home should come to, must rest epos the abstract crestion, whether a custom that hail existed in this country for three centuries, should still be continued or overturned. The House out abaft to decide a question of •a general nature; Ilotto take away the right of an individual, but to de *mine whether a Queen Unmet of England generally *Meld be degraded at the pleasure of the Governmeat. -(Hear. lest.)—He now charged the Ministers el Olt rows with having, on the Itch of February last. auto girder respecting her Majesty, which sae contrary t! do Repel, and grossly illegat.—(Hear.)-- Ifillbe set was an invasion of the undoubted rights tidal the Queen possessed in virtue of the Statute. He should illustrate hie position by quoting some short data Non, the civil and ecclesiastical history of the i t:country, silica the time of the Reformation. Ile would Not dispute, that since that period the power which had been antecedently posseised by the See of Rowe, was vested in he King. Every holy knew that when the IKe took place, the discipline of the Church had shagged its character, and became a matter of civil mirillitioit. The Church sad the State were, from that .periosLiatenssixecl with each other; and all etelosias tical matters, including the Liturgies of the Church, were established by Act of Parliament. Thus t64s the Church made a part of the State, by law. The King was certainly mule* the head o f the Church, but the Law. which made him so, defined his power. The question, then, was not whether the King was the head of the Cbsrch, bat whether the several Ada of Par liaises', passed since the Reformation, did not abridge thq power which he might be supposed to exercise as head of the ('butch? ,All the prerogatives that were supposed to belong to the King, in this new character. became lost and confused in consequence of the Kite, delegating to Parliament the power be had derived time it, sod which be had before exercised. After the restores tion, agenerel Church Litargy was established by the Act of Uniformity, which bad for its object to secure a , civil recognition of all the component parts of Ote amain tutione of the country. The principle of that 4W trio that the Church and the State were to be *entitled. thell one should be recognised in the other. The effect of this Act was the complete settlement of tb Liturgy, So the year ls6l. This was dune by Act of Parliament ; endebe Service of the Church was Itself as much ate Act of Parliament as if it had been entered on the liamitoll. The House theree. in considering= , wee bound to look stile construction oT the l e tt of whith the Liturgy formed a part. Tice Act of Uniformity declared. that she Lieuriajth ould be psietede , aade a port of thesertice Of Thi Church ; theocrat, Uturgy was made an Act of Parliament. The Art did net contain any charge to enable the Crown to make as alltration in the Liturgy. 'The Crown had not the pewee to alter even a letter of it, except the power granted by one clause to which be should refer. They most, therefore, refer to the Act of Unifonsity, in order to see what were the powers which belingeli to the Crown. The clause to which he alluded ftsto this ef feet :—m Provided always, and be it further enacted, tbst In ail prayers relative to the Queen, and other branched of the Royal Family, the names may be altered from time `to time, according to lawful authority, itc." Here then a power was OMR to the Crown to put out a name, yid substitute another name according to circumstances, Its stead; but the act gave the lt:ng no power se erase the name of a person living at the time; and If such a power was claimed, why was it not stated in the Act of Parliament ? The Act was most elaborately re titled by the greatest lawyer of the country. It was mode after the rage of the civil war had ceased; and those who restored the Monarchy never intended to de grade the Queen. The names of all the forpier Queens were in the Liturgy : and the act of uniformity fol lowed the example of what had been done before ; and was it to he supposed that the Act gave the Kings power to leave out the name of the Queen Consort? la the printed copy of the Prayer-hook, after the Aet passed, Charles 11. not being then married, there was a blank left for the name of a Queen Consort to be inserted in it. This was an argument to show that the Litergy, established by the Act of Uniformity, was meant to be a complete copy of the Liturgies exist. ing in the former reigns. After this act was passed, the names of the Queen of Charles If. and James 11. were inserted is the Liturgy- Thus then they had clearly before them the roaraetudo Regal ; and it was einea• ordinary that an Anti-radical Administration, so wirer*, to every sort of Innovation, would reject what had Wee uniformly adhered to. All the great institutions of the State depended npnn usage and nothing else : and yet the Noble Lord and hie Anti-Radical Administration, I admit of no change, were about to break established usages of the kingdom. He agile the omission of the Queen's name frame and the moment he found they bad rites order in February last, he formed a resole. !IT to countenance any of their utessinial d lieutlentaa now proceeded to &deed le precedents on which hie argument 111111 ie circumstance of the name of the QUIPIIII . was relied en. But theognees never WIN country ; her name was hardly known whs. addressed in Uncover, before he male Ile her name was net eyes meritioliell.-- -tag had bees divorced bit. eigtiteen years her; and she bad been locked up as a Fri ianorer. Therefore her cage could be se pre. godagd o ad every argument founded apes it was owpliasisal and absurd. There was another principle *lsich he founded the rights of the Queen Cnienart. By the cent/non law of the eoentry the ac the h ad peal rg i ee " o of :t r loeseofe ithith:l‘ini and she lThe had the law 1 right •to exact submission and *be lbws all the anitjacts. TM. privilege did not tat the pleasure o the King but oa the law r sad It was not in the pewee of the King to take of these rights away host her. There was isitp* enjoyed by the Qbeen which were mg as woltior tit been so Oeieo tho Mar were secured II might Jost as Well be said. dm lb. King Iskiiewey freewill* 'IIW newt et fleece, es allot other Frillier* Ho . iled 011111111tati son, kerns vises of Sit lusedisi , swistioratmetod with hi* a l i dE c deali t irbiN ghat biltpUtall deist relklierk ki reed la elf Nor . pr tk II *it sM aleveiblei. A viAsAlsneassuilairoillikli bid fie= not of the bitaggy sight we have . dew ems Wog with Se aims et the King t --- ----- ----- -- ••• ••••• ~,- .....y, •••• .m wit• w.c user majesty's same to rule faits • they now regretted it. But, toe the other hand, be A w l h e wou ld as h i a w h at way . &swilled astsodieheiher it was the prowat Ministers who m od it b e dame In sae ether wa • wren which they were sow called upon t h e Ki a , w hi c h woof,' be a pei t 'ie seat was the feet, it ought to call down Bat the Net& Lord rilbeeits St . I "'"te 6 ". osier a otkidisessonsrool Salt* austere pewees" Mali 11 73 'NM ay dor King directly. it **(told lE eier airy ought to kart the .t 'beak e It wits Maim, / a hint of the feelings of =or to ter "ad" tel a get o meto eisouhl be "um' A fiiot!—Was this the language I lag likerand to &NIA ant joslify dr*asares which they oas a subject as the present ? had AM. impressed or rocomoreodoe. Ilse erasure of was sot the proper mode of can , the Queens remora was m e lee% tad their elm' the House of Commons to the fou 'hieing to keep her etched was still liS•re so.— th.e if M1.1.e.... kJ .....-1 :.. •L t- JAW "• 6 '""* -7 sTATEsigAN : , 11111 Apt wry la look at do soodeot of Minis- 'meat ba eameidersol.. ailltiolher taw oftlasioa of ber Majesty's saw th. act " aaitY• Marin- ritual tulrlai. ....A..' .11 a *mar day, be did so he oce of a (been wh i eh wo o d ed same dre i lan t a l ' s " dawn the estabi see exception, *awl declared, that the First I bet her Li terry ..t, far also was .00 ,4 at illegai on ountry, either as so , • , ea longer •6 e had never been , • Learned 1. .11k :mown at IA 4 . o f t h e pi here—in . feendsd. The far as the rot& . tbeorge I. W 4 Bat it was I to Ws enteterl nut me how the mods t h e King wan got over. That Ace th i s toaster ; light be made fronallites f e do r a t h e ki ni !re did the word .. t" hefr e e fro . h e , rooeeded re noti I roast is Hanovs had been cominct t, .and ei rted, be contended,,,loi =laical and !hes. He himself klins en which he fellow of the worst Illba• c omart. By of hear, hear.)—He de. fai h oo t el Pressley fee this prosibil• j--bad the r - - • • Mr* et thin Members sew nee ;* 16444 iii Net she the' talk woe lead awl repeat/140 thalami. ilemberfil . . . liakilh•VJj 7 , 1 i 11 t i f illi44l. e peeeeleVi t ot e gii:Dt ges**l twietßatietiel mity watt• sage to the &vertigo, or to the lediettlaal who was ha- medial* the subject of It. Whatever hail bees dome, r..V l i, • V doe • I - ''; • 74., (HIM ass . 11100).—Itere set the words of the set eiselly appliellbis to the one as the other ? Na had *artfully perused the Ast of Uniformity, and he del-bred kits his opinion, that the name of the one bo out without that of the otbef. The Hitt was, to unite the Church asttleatt w to alter any pert of the tin et of Parliament; and theeefere there multi be ne putter Ott suer the echshtedral part, hem* Sky erne both together.- It was knows that Hill eta; Wes Charles 11. wall Ike first object of attack open the phociple on which her present Majesty bad bees es tailed. Bet that authority sob sot one which shitill be dulled Imo operatios ' as the act of expnnging her Mae from the Liturgy, bad been followed by as eta& rthe King himself, and wa s not likely to be cited preeniest of any forte spew the pretest *cession. It was the duty of Ministers to bring fortwanf t If Writ a thing were in cootemplation of the Crows, a lt the evi dent', which went to establish the neerseltrof each 'a plimmilllbsi hosed of doing Which, they bed pet In met twist her a tribunal loch as had octet Wore hoes rasoled to, except in the memorable isstasseof the jeriediedidel lathe High Commission lours , which had exercised a censorship 'norm over the Queen shunt, to that which was now est a bli s h e d by the Pricy Council.— (Hear, hear.)—A case of thi s ki n d might certainly nem Agnes savor t bat in deciding upon that indiridnal calk. Sher Meuse was deciding upon every • contingeacilleat might occur , involving the viestion of a Queen Cas eates privileges. They were deciding. If the event ehesid-prove in opposition to the motion, drat the bathe a a Queen migh t be struck out of the L i t urg y, an d th a t she might bedegraded without a reference to any autho rity, but that which was not recognised by Liw. If the eltee of the Queen were left to the discretion of a Com o Court, it was in vain to say that she was pos sessed of the indelible attributes of loyalty, abandoned as she must be to the mercy of her reedlike. The favour of a Court and popular favour Were equally capricious, and those who would permit the pri vileges of a Queen to be so violated, were open ing a door by which the King might be disgraced. Parliament alone was then entitled to the exercise of the pewee to which he alluded in the case of the pre seat Queen, who had all through the proverntioe been treated with the most extraordinary inhumanity.— (Hear, hear,) He did sot here intend to iiddeei the Mouse upon the subject of her Majesty's j rosecutois baring taken gloom themselves the office of adicial ar •easers and ioqiisituritl Joilgee.--(Lond cries of pear,) ear did he Intend to ester at large upon the Swaim of 'eh's/ideate illegally•colteeted seder a secret commis hear,)—which bore .resemblance to no tribe's! but the Star Chamber; but ever slaty be had ascertained that this illegal cosine had been adopted. he had bestowed incessant pains upon the subject of the measures resorted to a gaisst th e Queen. The Que e n had been cashiered upon evidence under the most dis graceful eiremumanees, and practises bad bees remelt& to by her 'omits to pre vest her from entering with itp: vantage epos her defence- - a principle which went to' ' spoliate the rights of humanity. Now If thirflill came down, which went to deprive Ilse Queen 000' dignity, sad to degrade her, he should say, that tbolltahjects hid already been Abetted by a system of prejndkation, set up to poison ths public mind, as well as to strip her o f her rights mid pi/lieges. Combining all Him* objec tions with theirs:lZr of t i ne fact, that eyilat out of let of the of 11 were Of opin en, that the whole the proc eedings agsliset Moe Qetten were unjust end ishuseas = he owed sot but ditpre!nte then with all hie might, in thaltbpe that Immediate means would be taken to pot era *ad to a system which had caused so much agitation.—(Cheers.) Doctor DODSON contended. that the King had as meth authority over the Church as the Pepe had exer cised before the Reformation. In the reign of beth Hastrights of the Church, which had in tie, rein", of Mary been given back to the Pope, were 'restored to the Crown, and ever after, with very few ioterruptiouf, ',ionised with the Crown. It was, be declaned, , bus to infer, that the omission of the Kist's name is the Liturgy, might follow the omission of that of the Queen. How could such a thing occur when the discre tion lay with the King hinowdL—(Hear, beer.)—Bat the Hon. Oentleman's (Wetherell's) umoorchical love was so great, that he was afraid to trust eves the King with that discretion. Sir J. NRWPORT quoted the Irish. Act miry, as evidence to prove that the right to • Queen's same from the Liturgy, existed in alone. The Statute Law was, be said; as it step& see clusive.• • The ATTORNEY-0 EN RRA I. firmed Is., that those who were dissatisfied with the net the Queen's same had sot expressed that diesatielbedbo twelve months age. The whole argument of t who advocated the Queen was built upon the poi • that the right of her Majesty was immutable; but the bad not shown bow she bad any right of the kind. T e Act of Uniformity gave no such right; and, notwithstanding the appellation of Star Chamber which heal bees given to the authority from which the wan had lamed, the power that bad been exercised was an existhw legal power. The law open the subject said the King bed the power of "altering ' the names is the Poem of Daimon ' Prayer, which included " erasing." At the time of Charles , 11. there was no Queen I;ossert. The blank was then filled up with the same of the Queen Cleerser. Unionissions had frequestly tskaspleos. Is the Mg, of George 11. die name of Passe Predsrlek, why h idlers for some time prayed for, wan struck oat, and is that bt Phillip and Mary. the Kidg was prayed for. awl sot the Queen.--(Hear, hear, and cries of "Ehe is set ewes Consort. )—No—she was Queen The Forts of Prayer was " Pre lege li tt lisse. priadjaisa nie. Not only had Kings impertoll strictly royal into the Arm of "raper, bat signally ask ed the names of persons who had 6th prayed frt. Plena the year 1714 to the proem, with witrioßtery istesp done, there bad been one ssiforea heading to the webs is Cattail. Did his Honostsble sod Learned MOM that the Coogan had coseelted "14. t . 1 . F : I . 1 0 1 I ,I . 1 . .1 I . I I f I f 1 . 1- 1 " i ' • It . I t E t t t B I ' t t ; . . . s at P rA t c h t a g t ol p grli e s •c la h :2lr... ".. l t ? " li ss al ee . , said that the Watson of the *if* of stance at all. Did his Hoseerabia sod I 'seas to assert that Omer I. weal, ell EsSellb sild pat► pot*. divorced frets his wife ? If Akers* the ellek bib happeoad it that she was always' styled She Dediese Of , Hanover ? He contended that Woe was Ise MOM of 4 inch a diverse I sod he would Amine try, lIPM whei- ever might have hew the . erilest I ibi imam *lf Omege die first. the low ass:isiroMN %qui. jeer. If this woe a legal elgOrkgte Of MO - Meet *as a mach estitled I f 011 Ike most virtuoso Queen did hp aret 111 1 1 the Ministate of that peeled hersisodelpubie , .. . the embalm of her name deem oho ILltmegy,Oit • sisters /Atha promo* day wore In •adviMait eho of her prawns Majsmy's dew lbw Um balltaiiisid , Mambo, then amitedod i ONO theiVepar l l * s.Cae to sonstien the Hitt •Obliiibe Wkm - 114 ittalawsall& b. 'IP" a lble lig r e" ... sall ie lLeadlisd hasP Alsolo ir air ille-Quilir Was saiiiied * Os "OW 4 tibia web" lotedied bailliblee* lb Mill gree, 401111rasii•tryshedi•wmilijidisilimilitto the to saVitiatimi• diode Okapi 4st 4 , 0 10 1 00 6 -000.6" l ad . 4%! • . , . dmikilkiir od 4.6 *Hy t 141 orb *. sat &r es tbs ease, 1$ IltrlnsePliaMP; 44..- as. (Hear.)—lt wee charged against his Majeft's tars that tlasy acted is as I read 111111111 t. WSW (. 7, • • - 10.14 I '7IFP! I T r . ir 4 4 p.. ie- er. Jet de- pa w 0W a 10"