The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-02-21 00:00:00

Mr. S. WORTLEY presented a similar Petition from Doncaster. Mr. MUNDY presented a similar Petition from Occupiers of Land in Derbyshire. Sir ISAAC COFFIN slid Out farmers were very loud In their complaints. but oar cause of distress was, that farmers turned tientlemen, f and indulged in e pence ; the best thi n g to be dune WWI, or the emintry x to return to its original habits, and fur Uentlemen far leers to resume their frocks. Mr. C. SMITH assured the Honourable member who kid just sat down, that be need not be under any apprehensions respecting the habits of farmers ; their great 111111.1 increasing distress bad o bliged most o f them to resnme the frock, and to deny themselves com forts to whirls they had been accustomed. The several Petitions were read, and ordered to be IRISH COURT' OF 1.%W. Mr. C. ORAN f brought in a Bill to regulate the Civil Proceedings in Courts of Justice in Ireland.— Urtiered to be read a second time the 2d of March. TIMBER 'ITIADE. Mr. DIADSTONE presented a Petition from cer t tin Merchants of Liverrool,eugageil in the Timber Trade with North America, praying that the pr.,- teeth), Duties might be continued. —Ordered w b.. printed. Sir E. KNATCHRULL rose to put a tptestion to Ministers• It was known that an affray of a serious ratnre too': place aboat tee d.iys ago in the county of Kent with some smugglers ; two person"; had been taken into custody on that occasion, and instead of hiring been examined before the local Magistrates of the county, those persons had been sent off to Bow s!reet by the °Hirers of the Preventive Service. lie wished to I.now whether these officers in doing so, •ted nailer the authority of Ministers, and what in eructiows were issued to them? Sir G. CLERK said, that no instructions were issued to the Officers of the Prey: nave Service, %% WI respect tb the two individuals who bail been takeu ir.to citstotly. lint in justice it was but fair to say, ti•at those indi; idiot's were sent up to London because it was considered a•course best calculated to answer the ends of justice,. and nut for the purp'use of throw ing any disrespect on the local Magistrates of Kent. The affray was a most serious one, in which several Fees bad been lost , an d the prisoners had been trans. mittetl to London in order that the best legal advice right be at hand. 11C LL poog n %TES SILL. Mr. S. WOHTLE prvented a Petition against ' ails Bill, from the Inhabitants of nom—Ordered to Fe on the Table. FORGERT ON TIM BANK, Mr. VTR' EN said, that he had understood front autliorite, that the plan of Mr. Applegate's, the per son employed to engrave the new Itank-notes, In order t prevent future forgeries on the 11 ink hail entirely f lie was therefore anxious to hear faun au il u nunrahle Member (Mr. Thvies Gilbert), whether e)e Commissioners hail any plan before theta which Vag likely to he approved of. If nothing satisfactory was likely to be accomplished, he w:iitld feel it his duty to sishtn't a 'autism to the Iluitse sin the subject oft an early day. Mr. D. tillaitEßT said, Mr. Applegarth, by means eta chemical process. width had the elfert of harden in!, the heel, runlet multiply the im,,re..ions to an r 'most indefinite extent, and so far prove the identity of the notes. But it g reat r to every Gentleman. there was a great deal more than identity recess•try. Mr. Appletrarth's plan was ther•fore ts • jecte,l. lie was not really aware whether any thing 1.411 been done for the last three weeks. Mr. CI:ItiVEN said if something was neespeedily done, he certainly would feel it hi• duly to bring the suatur under the tonsioleratiot. of the Ilonse. Sir ISAAC COFFIN said, that be hail recommend ed Mr. Parkins, an Aineriran artist, and felt a natu ral interest for the sneers% of that Denticulate% plan. 1 1 Mr. (ALBERT %Ail, that the plan only differed fratts cc:union engraving in the instance lie had already stated. That indeed was a transeem!ant improvement, Let in other respects his p ism pre.ented nothing very su?erior to common engravings. Air. IA ITLE ['ON rose to wowe for leave to bring it a Dill to regulate Chureh Briefs anti the collee titm of money thereon. The ohjeet of this Bill was principally to reduce or to abolish the patent and flat f^es: anti he would also subunit to the Right Hon. li en tleman (the Chancellor of the Earbeir,r). that the charges far stamps ought to he altogether re n.oved. The liononrable Dentlentan coneluiled by moving for leave to bring in his Dill, which tas granted. ptiuted. ADMIRALTY FEES. Sir M. W. RIDLEY moved fur an Areonnt of Ad. y Fees fur the last ten years, with the u p: , ropria• tinn thereof.--Ordered. CONVICTIONB FOR FORGFRIVI IN IRE'. %ND. Mr. U. lIIS. NEC moved for am Account of the Naulber sof Persons c.oteieteil for f o rging Batik of Ire land Notes fur the last three years, spe.ing the! number of emit year : and also for an Account of the Number of Persons % were execntotl in that eonittry for the same offence, during the cant: period. 'flue Report on the Flax and Cotton Acts, ;vas hronght op and read. ‘M PETITION. Mr. DEN NI .t N said, he held a Petition from the Peo. plc of Nottinghant,prayiug for an intoiry into t ti e late State into ..t• the. C.suntry—praying specifically toren Inqy t':e TfitiloUtiillll4 which took place at M a nchester ( llear, hear.) —and also that Articles of I m peachment u:ight to exhibited against Ministers. In the ate ice of 31inisters Iw wo.tild not stop to say bow notch he wzreel in most of the sentiments expressed by the Pe titioners-1;e would not say how far their t otishict ap pea.r.l 10 him to deserve the Pere re i m putation whirls t:.e Petitioners cast upon them. It was ti ece.sary fo: in to s iv, that stone Members thought that the lan ffilitge of the Petition was rather ton strong: for his tnvn part, began. uo ohjertion to the Petition ; but thslangnige of the Potition was strong , the s tate of distieNs to which the Petitioners were reduced s hoot,' rlea4 for the warin th of their feeling.. It would be recollected that Nottingham was meationfd as one of C.ose places in which trade had latterly *velvet"; bat in one parish in Nottingham the arrears of the Poor Kates amounted to six thousand pounds—a suns whirls, ii attempted to be levied. would bring the greater part of the working people to absolute ruin —sixty *wants should be issued daily to enforce ttte pay ascent of s sach men . country. ants pest. as it was only fair to excuse, the warm expres sion of their sentiments. The Petition wa s tl.en brought up, and read by t he Clerk. It commenced by o bserving, that the present were not times for the Petitioners to use the, laugnage of adulation, but.. to speak as Englishmen upon the distresses and wrong.; of their country. They implor ed the Dense, as they valued their you comfort tand se curity, to attend t o the ...laity an n d consf of their fellow.connt rynien. 'they 'dated, that the great est evils had been brought neon the country by the acts of a corriipt and utif.seling Aditsinistration, antler whose policy the real glory of England was tarnished, and her people bent down limier the acts of cruelty and o ppression. The itiott , t of them. Ministers was " Divide and conquer." They implored the lionee to institute an impeachment against them for the various inlttries they hail inflicted on the people, unit for their base and traitorous conduct agai not their innocent. high ininde•l, and persecuted Queen. They wished ha ten ify the peapie by acts of tyrautiy—men were thon led to captivity, and his 'wilt to the scaffold wit twist c . ois e. The pee.ple. sn'tcring ender tlistre,e and fortune, cried tail for comp!food—theiaints b wer e answ ered by the Chen Law—by swor il ay —and diefrareful". of Parliament. The carnage of the metro . Ai of August, a slay of blood, which was not acconnted f •r, demanded retributive justice. They Frayed that the traltoro and noir•lerers of that day might. he brought to condign punishmen r. The people on t! at day hat ;lone no wrong—(hea bear;)--why then shonlol they -ye been butchered by armed yeiorsatiry, whc• received pnblie than:sit for their deeds of noir.ler awl of blood, from the ND nioters of the Pellet. liege at —1 he Petition was ordered to lie on the Table. On the qnestian being rut, that the Petition be printed. M. C. ItYNNE said, he did not object to the moth" that the Petition should lie on the T a hle, notwithstand ing the eirensiveness of its laneitagi., but he could not allow an allegation to iro forth to the world, that well were btottglit ittijoistly to the scaffold. Such a charge was a gross insult to the public jiietire of the country, and should not receive circiilation frost' that House. Mr. U. BENNF.T said, that he did not agree in all the statements of the Petition., lint he bad no elonlit that a great portion of them was strictly tree. But be could not lint strongly ohject to the attempt of getting rid, by way of a side win'', of the old tight of printing Petitions. One great ohject acktiowleilged on all !sands was, that the country should be informed of the proceed ings of that Donor, hut the present was an attempt to prevent the country from being informed. The lion. Gentleman concluded by flaying, that the right of having the Petitione of site people printed and cirzulated was one which he would not conoent to surrender : he would take the sense of the liokke upon time %abject. Lord BINNING said he was surprised at the setegger ated view which the lion. Member had taken Kith re opeet to the printing of this single Petition. The ohl practice was, that the votes % hoofs' b e hid hetue ti m e Speaker, and if any thing in the P:aition app..ariel tut p irliamentary or improper, the Speaker, ;odor his dia.' cretion, was at liberty to erase it. In his opiiiion, the House should not be deprived of the right to keep hark (rota time people matter whirls wsa itOolltittg to the Cha racter of England. Sir itoimaT %'ILSfIN said be diil not rise to Instify all the allegations in the Petition. fist could it be de tiled that nisn were put to death in open violation of the l a w—could it be deni ed els.), that %Blasters refused to bring the partSes accused of the mueder to justicthee? Rut Ministers dist snore than that, they recrardell—y rewarded those persons with a vote of thanks; and the Magistrates who was accused of haying given the seder foe attack, received a lucrative place from llinistrrs. The Petitioners gave Ministers an opportunity , if they dared, to enter into a jastification of their conduct. It was a melancholy and ilegracefal fact, that eislottelree and twenty persons were either killed or maimed on the With of Angust, and that no enquiry whatever followed. lie (Sir Robert) was in a Court ;If Law a few slays since when a Member of that House (Sir F. ilitrilett) bad been brosight up to receive the juslgnieet of the Court. because he addressed a Letter to his C o notitstento, under feelings of 'non, u did honour to his heart. For AU the lion. Baronet was consigned to a prison : but per awls whom he (Sir Robert) wsv prepares. to prove gnilty of tisurtier—yes, if an opportunity were allowed hint, he was prepared to prove the far: at the Bar of that 110111%,; those persons were not only at (Al lilierty,lint were also- Intely rewarded, and enrosimeeil, as far as impunity coelil enconrage this tn. to repeat the offence. In the Court to which be hail allndell, he peeollected the Jtolee to hare declared that no wroteesausahl he comnsitted in England wiliont redress. He would wilt the lionoe whether any redress hill been ever yet afforded to the utterer( of 31arehester ? He hail been for ruontlis attempting to brine fora rd some itiopl'.ry on this 'Helm - admit . subject, but he (mind hinsaelf check ul in every piiiiit ; he tail it impossible to hring the ssibject before a regulaGr - bunal. The Gallant General conelinled by saying, that :since the ;late of the Letter. appr•itine of time cominet of the Manchester Yeomanry. every act of the Government required a Bill of indemnity. Lord C.ISTI.F.REAtiII said, that it was an extra ordinary assertion that the Government was hound to bring persons so justice scrawl of crime. If such charges could he legally suetaineil, why were nut steps taken to bring them forward i ;oat if those els:trees could be sotetained, the I ;Alain General, in stead of going down t • that Mike with false insinua tions, was bound to bring them forwent in a reptile shape. For his own part, he ehiried its the part which he had taken wills respect to that trattsactiuti. in proenring the sanction of ti-veroment to those whose lomullde effort 4 on that ocraoion were dictatril by what they conoillered, and what Ire laelieve h d to he, a Seta e of dusty. s to the v.-sirds of te petition, there were ocarcely any expresoiuns respect ing the Ministers of the I. rown wine!' elsottlil make him hesitate to receive petitions of the people. (Hear); bat when the petition spoke of Acts of the Legislature, sad of the adtniektration of justice, in the tennis which had bees' era& he thottelit that to receive it nould be to encourage the pretkru:i •ant spirit out of -- • Winn inadvertence OT otherwise, an °b on wea laid upon the table, were they all discussion, and obliged to print •• ? Sir 11. WILSON said, lie hail not •asserted any thing that lie was nut vrepared 'o prove. He charged the p.trtiea to the transaction of the 16th of August w ith wee der, a nal l ie wa s.. repaired to take the !Tyson sibility of that charge.—(llear.) Loral CASTLEREAGH said, the Honourable Ge neral had better bring the charge before a competeut Sir M. HIDLEY thonght that if a petition was fit to b.: laid on the table, it W:111 lit to he printed, and therefore he slsonhl vote that it be printed ; though he was ready to admit that he should have voted against the reception of it, if a question hail been taken on it. Mr. WYNN could not swear to the proposition that every petition that was nsceived was tit to he printed, as there might be petitions presented containing re fiections on individuals which it would be highly ins proper to genii forth. Mr. DICKINSON concurred with the Honourable Baronet, (Slr M. Ridley). Mr. BATILUIIST expressed an opposite opinion. Mr. B. WILBRAHAM said, the Alaoiatrates and Yeomanry of Manchester were, and hail always been, anxious for iturjry. Mr. PIIILLIVS said he bad made inquiries reapeet ing the transactions of the Itids of .Ittgust, and from the most careful exarrination, he could find nothing that could anthorize that violent interference with the people.—(Hear.) It had heels said is that House and elsewhere, that the account' of the violence on that day were exaggerated. lle was sorry to say, that from his inquiries be was convinced that they were nut exaggeratell.—liills, had n s doubt been presented to the Grand Jury against some of the Yeomanry, and were thrown out. Ile wool'{ not make any reflections upon that Jury. but he wotthl sae, that if the same course ball been allowed as to those hills as in the trial of an itislivislital connected with that affair, Mc. Hunt, a sol if instead of lasing pre seuted to a fir nil Jury of Lanculiire, when that county wag in a state of the utmost inflammation, it bad been presented to a Grand Jury of York, the result wouhi have been very different.--(hear Mr. S. WORTLEY said, the Honourable General opposite bad affirmed 'hat he bad a charge of warder against the lagistrates of Nlanchester. If the lion. )Etcher hal It, %darn wonia he prove it? It was Isis duty to pr:ssent bills to the 6rausl Jury over and over again, till they v. ere foetid, if he had such a charge. As to t h e bills which had been presented to the Lan caster Grand Jury, they were not for murder. 'lbis charge of noiriler was, lie wag convinced, brou g ht on from time to tittle, fur the perposes of inflammations because if the object really was inquiry, it might have been attained by au action fur a cutunson assault, when all the facts might lie bronght in evidence as com pletely as uto:n any oth.w charge. Sir It. WILSON heggial the Honourable Member its the liist place to recollect the proceedings at Old ham, before the Comtism . , at which, thongb on account of the conilit..l of the Coroner, the inquest s tn ever formally brunt: lit to us termination, yet the majoity of the Jury Lad sled:trot that they would have brought in a verdict of wilful t nnrder.— (lleac, hear') As to the allegation, that the persons who had suff..red in the llanchester Massacre noight have brought an ac tion fun asaaelt, Ise would ask the Honourable Gentle man, if his Lathe% or brother, sir son, had been mar dcred on that occasion, whether he should have been content with an action for assault? Mr. S. WI MILEY explained. Mr. 111l0[4:11AM wis sure that they were all an xious to have the Petition printed, utile.% :owls a course was issroosistent with the forms of the !lonic. Ile understood il ie ssisi-ction to be founded on that passage in which the pet;tionars cons;:lainesl of " trimly dis graceful Acts of Parliationst, restricting the litoberthat ties of the people.“—(t'rie• of •' No, no.' )—No w expression he slid not lintels subject, even though that language were applied d i rectly to the conduct of the legislature ; lint if the itott,e looked at the cone ext, tisev would hind tit it thin applied not to eisltote, lint to the conduct of Ministers. The hums. and Learned Gentleman then rsail the o lsjectionable parts of the petition, and showed that, not the justice of the Cisitrts of Law, lint the conduct of Isis 31ajesty's Ml nistera was impugned. As to the Manchester ques tiou, he was not diaposed to say tooth at present. u the slay was approaching when the subject would hr fully ilisintssed : hat lie meat nose state that he hail stem ssothing to alter in the !smallest degree the opinion which he fortnerly exprestse.!. that the proceedings after the Ifith of August, particularly the pre tended judicial p r oesseslings, hail ( lone m ore than an y other art of our day to shake the confidence of the pcophs its the impartial aslusinistratiots of jitstice.— (Ilear, bear.) Mr. LI'SsIINGTON wished to bring hack the at of the Meta,• to the question before them, and referral to what took place in the last session, who+, after a petition had Iseen received, the motion for ;wilding it hail liven negatived. Mr. DWI 'IIII.IM explained. Mr. W. W explained. The paaaage Ise ob jected to was, that in which the petitioners lamented that when the people railed the cry of they hail been treated a& tr.sitors, and consigned unjustly to the scaffold. Mr. 31.1NSFI ELI) opposed the printing of the petition. Mr. DENMAN, in reply, decksresi, that be had not expressed tiny disapprobation of the petition, and said that he had stalled attention to it, because some of his friends to wl he had commitnicated it had expressed a doubt, not whether the latignage Wall tit to he ad mitted, butt whether it svoishl be admitted by that lions*. What the petition asserted was, that the people who had raised, the voise of lamentation atol woe had been met by sword's and bayonets, and had been ultimately consigned to ignotisistioiss death on the scaffold. This was strictly true. It waa true that the people bad been worked tip to co iiiii tit acts. of trio hence by distress ; and that, so indamed, they had been operated upon by spies and informers to acts Isy which they had !teen led to the seaffniel—{lleac. hear). This was not to be denied ; it was too well eatablislied, mad most disgraceful it Was to die doyen). went and Police of the country.—As to the transac tions of the 16th Anglin', it was most extraordinary that the Ministers should have taken no in iiiii es to inquireinto those pruc.edings alter they asst voted thanks to those of whom all they knew atthe th l p l u e a r t t w o t a l l Y g o l i a l4l split e t i l: ll l: e o u %: b e i c .r e t r he t,..ptebhDola7tyliheeortf t h e (wNierre. peop l e,Btnllsai when the motion fur inquiry nas brestgl There never was such an opportunity befave„ the House had fully aVailed itself, of betravii interests of toe people. The Noble Lord C tlereagio) hail, however, ott a former swam them particular facts, which 'ld alit have' if they had been trite, (for there haul bent dicial inquiry in this case.) The Noble Cistiereaglt) had tot.' them, on a former the earl loads of stapes that were found upon at Manchester.—(Hear, hear 1 .) —and of trate. who had been trampled under feet ' lion of their duty. la the trial of Mr. Hi as the Honourable Mentiro. for Yorkshi them, there hail been an opportunity f these important facts.—(llear !)—lt was tertsts of the Magistrates who were the have proved these facts, yet not the slight them had hem offered, and the Noble Lord' remained—a lesson to the Noble Lord how ex-pnt•te statements which hall not been the test of a full inquiry. They shoal sight of this fact, that there was an proving these facts, and that they had sot —(Hear !J. —lid should not recede fro he had made for the printing of the langnatre might he wrong, but it was know how the peope felt. Mr. H. WI LiIItAHANI explained The AT fORNEY-UENERAL rose, question was so general that he did not Upon a division, the numbers were— For Printing the Petition . Against it Majority. .. ... Mr. J011\80)1'4 CASE, Mr. 1108110 U SE, adverting to the' had appeared in the pub:le journals the refusal of the Secretary for toe ilo accede to. the Petition, praying that M was at present a prisoner in Lit:colo quence of his appearance at the Mem might be allowed to go and see his aril a tlyitt; state, in the vicinity of Mani was now no more; took occasion to Secretary of State whether the vtatemet were correct, and if so, upon what grow Lord at the brad of the oleparttstet refuse the permission solicited under circumstances? Mr. CUV E expressed his readiness Member any information in his power, actual knowled . ;e whatever of the ferred to. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL ohset Johnson could not be legally allowed Lary of State, or by any usher ant Manchester, unless the remainder , Lop:isonattost were remitted, and m circumstances of the case it was fru sileration, that snch a retaiss4 consii•ently gr "'Ted. 'I herefore, State, who was most humanely disl abject of Mr. Johnson, was preclud' his wish to relieve the pris suer under circumstances. Mr. lit HillOrSE asked the what was the term of Mr. Johnson prisonment which yet remained ? The AT I OHN EV-ti ES Eli Ai. cauld not precisely say, but i.e reci Johnson was c ..... mittett lat‘t year. SCOTCH CitiUNTY ILKPRES' Lord ARCHIBALD lIA MIIME imatelli:itely after Easter he meant fora aril relative to the state of the sentation. CONDI:VT OF THE 811F.UIFF Mr. CREEV EY lose for the purpose motion, founded upon a Petition tit the county of Chester. He until briefly this :—A meeting of the N' try, and FrAulders of Chesil : J . ': Sheriff At that meeting an adheres an amendment was moored and seem men, Earl tirtssvenor and Limit:re% was to sugge4 another and a diff rating the conduct of his Majestl quiring the restoration of tier Mi Liturgy. This was the material two addresses; lint it appeared II ()erasion, took upon himself to sal dresses was " irrelevant." What " irrelevant" he (Mr. ('reevey) Sheriff also took upon himself to ment of F.arl tirosvenor anti Lord put at all, and wheat the address, t Cliolenontieley was again proposed , low the nettntive to be even put II - a r, l i e•tr ') —This last address and professed to be that a , w hereas, these petitioner* atilt Commons, that if their mayn't which they rOntersd the elteriC the majority of the meeting' wool' I—(llear.)—if these farts wet alettv but that Riirl Grosvenor, nolibernen, gentlemen, and fr. with thou in this installer, liap of their undoubted right. 'I hi 'be (Mr. Creevey) was prepared conduct of the sheriff was illegal I—(llene.) —ln the year !WO , House upon one occasion, " tl bath been, the undoubted rigt subject, in these kingtlaur". whether : h ir e: l b . : Db l . :l. i s t r.t h . p. e r „ ti l t : o c isi a nt i i I n g n it t h rl e itt itot in i t i t i t i. n ic Address was not for Otis very grievamses?-411ear.)—" And that all attempts to impugn. and aetiititot asy. s,"(A a (very n i tn: s $. 16 tine present 1. Sac So nine,' for the pr. epos the same day, and in qtranother entry of a ;Win MIA inhabitants of the City ' n et of the ti said Hoag IABIIIIO, 'Loud cries of hear . . 1 I E STATF M N. th a t nrrear, lie stated the fact tioliterr that tics. *hen, ft c Inouit have felt th e dee p distrait of their onaha l icctl of petlti and that from theta it frit_ S 11 )1t 1 .. 1 . 7t 2 t tr In:t rtlree.: taointbeseduer ..• I f I ,ti t , t ,:p.i t .,:tiiaer t i e r.:_je ti t n iii.i.eta . : i: l a oifi te twl neas iehicjvh . , Wiihrahmuy, the fo o.!ght f ont ar4. P 9rt . ty of ii iedii3O.l,oel:l3.l,elowrtefuredic,pftp.iatioarrruorn(4ssante,p,pinmilettmhi•filreariiitionsoraeiiitueuti:(eetuniskl7l::l:timeirincgilt.la ~ apofinesettandt.f.tfah,jr:eaoeu.inseepesrraid,nnotrettenhb:saacititiii officer chain siren re been Proved, ;shirr could proof I how he be ye t i lonia neve r tisro o t a be l ev re o v t . , • , t .or t nni i xoeiofiet • Lord' Claes Lord's assertions bad 1 satoe men subjected to IoW 1 tlan i • ll "Nonfinite 01 toms alleg to Petiti- r his .m. Th e dory as fit they g i n n a the 1 I Celli rend DM', but the e n Il y prof not speak. lion, .re— tlS new all IV .- —OD mot !.ir.. sr he he statemeat wid t h mee Ails wins renown, .., nig' lo ~e Depurtusestis pea t t Mr. Johnson, the faun t t ill a t aas i l t t i i l ino e l e : f . n b. r laia e rrss n s s iikt u tl t uee c r'ir h e 'h l i ; sul Aided e:edliel:'l:: I e ri* : .4 the wife, w ho wit i s lit 11 1 it groom! the Nobk ph tent thonght ht Is ' Ilia peatliu Id" y al loess to z ; v e t h e Hot (CI neer, but ha I :topes. .te afr t h e transaction is ~irto al , observed, that 4 rho tilowe.l by the Ser* au thority, to go I n by far r of his sentence of Fr I under the peculiar ve) t felt, epos due cos- Sc A sion c,,01.1 • sot lit sts: 're. the Secretors of (I disposva t o wards tie to tttleil lawn gratifyiq F. oiler such melancholy e li le Learned Gentle nos ! tott's sentence of irr I lla replied, that lit r e recollected that Mr. I r. e lESENTATION. lON gar.• notice, that 1 a nt to hrirg a mo tion t lie Scotts County Rep* 1 t FF OF CIIESIIIIIE. 1 turpone Id' subtoivingi 1 e Ist front the Freeholders toileroood the colic ts It I • Nuldiity, Clergy, l'^'l .c was curvetted by Or 1 daressecutoled by two lkil"e -I teassahmitoshol 4 ;rear, the effect of algid' ditf,•rent itildrelm , de?" esty's Nlinlsters, and rt• • lajesty's name to Co ini difference Wowed, I that the Sheriff on that •ay, that one of thew ak 'hot vas tt e .fit he thefts ) did not I,now. Dot thr .• ' to say, that the sorol• Arra Crowe 51t0n14 $0 it ress, moved Ir; Sir He' r e ivosed, he would 06 4 l l ' I pot upon it.—(erirsi iress had been pallir o94 sf the c onntv Of Chrs ter ! 4 a ffirmed to th e Densest f , iivtilit urn t had bees rt. ~,iir w,.... i..,„„4..0.9... ‘, 1,1 1,,,.. , ro tril for K. ; Were true. no min cAli itr, Lord Crewe, and tioot freelts.l4lers, Or, thooeil had been illevllydeptlOA his position being grog°. 'wed to contend dial 'le illegal and unwarrsetah* 1;$11, it trot voted is tli t " (hat it i• Dow, sod al"'!' right and hrivilege a x lbe s q, to peti:ion the Ilii ament<, or for the r.art s •' A„_ nieaa t io he said, dolly, l'lrs porgos..--lie edresift nd it *so further Wel A :It. or pot t l.oo r„ ot.b wee'• kli ;14 ct.osoron s, toionl:o o ` . .. Is tls , 11,•bi, b:. th e bye. 0`• .T i g li )I—ds a.... a bigher I:itiPetil:riy:ir7tlri.hoe:if:flerital.oir.:::,ltupr::il,eo.] " e . rs t afte. 'l.l 1 141 : : :: 11h : psitv : . !war, lie. r.,l—"arlio 9' Ma