The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-05-31 00:00:00

Pr:: admitted by the Pro )pted to innovate upon _ Equity, and many of consequence overturned. The ' ♦iew was of great im roperly be discussed when • Gentleman had moved the Lillie, but he was • several months before could be obtained. The treed Lord at the bead of • was undisputed ; and case, he (the Attor- Amendment. that the adoption of the Ipon the Lord Chancellor. d the fact that the talent,' Noble Person had been justice, was the strong motion. Even a legacy the Court of Chancery 001. The House was net merely to pledge itself reason for opposing the mo was imputed to any iodi- ,posed the motion. It Atical from the judicial .llor ; a proposition too resent advanced stage of spoke in favour of the ma 'rear of business would be lu.try and ability of the .his circumstance satis• was something wrong in nce of the subject was ad no sense be understood ted. He was no suitor of 'te knew the Court too )uld lose any sum of He admitted that the subdued, but that of Ap increasell, notwithstand• linty of the Lord Chat:- :etors was not only that it was also that justice he would put it to any !rn of the Court of Chao• .y ; a system destructive , of the comfott awl peace teed the situation of a msitor grievous and cruel, and e sense of the House upon .red to withdraw, and the dual blution, when there Againbt it, 36 ;—Majo- (o the Gallery, we found er addressing the Howe Lori Registrar of Scot• ,n of %%Web hail been re of the House. The office lid (as we understood the would be performed with !Tit by the person holding ,gnet ; and upon the death offices would be abolished alto west, added, that while upon Mention of the House to Some improvements had Hon. Gentlemen, which vailable, and therefore it ill in its present shape, as a year only. ht up certain papers rela- Ted to know whether it was tion of the Timber Duties he was not aware of any said, lie should feel it Lb if the House to the subject to know whether the Right )pposite intended to propose respecting Extents in Aid. if the EXCHEQUER said, )rmerly complained of had removed, he had not any in (eration of the present Law. ,ARY PRIVILEGE. rose to submit to the House a 'licit was, to indemnify the Member for Beverley in the occasioned to them by an ippon of its p - rivileges. The lac Mr. Burton was confined the time of bis election, and set at liberty, in consequence letter to the Speaker. The action against the Warden of and that act was declared by breach of privilege; but the from attending at the Bar of their conduct, on condition of Now as the law at present was released from a debt by a there was an end to the debt. Act of James I. which arose '. Shirley, who was taken in taken his seat in that House. r to the creditor to sue out a certain time after the privi ceased, but the construction of to persons who were taken in , lection, and not to those who were It the time of their election. The to these creditors of Mr. Burton hole expenses which they bad in tmated at 20001. more. Under all the id move that the House resolve of the whole House to consider Majesty for the purpose of granting those persons by way of compen- This he considered a mere act ividuals. but his object went still hereafter to submit a substantive for the purpose of rendering a seat in that Meuse who were • , . • . ~ 1 mmujr............. Lad been alluded to, but it was at t fusion that Lord i'llansfield attemi .4he jurisdiction of the Courts of 1 his decisions were in consequent present motion in every point ofl I portahce, and might very proper the information which the Hon. I for should have been laid upon quite satisfied sbat it would be s t that voluminous information con anxiety of the Noble and Learne the Court to do justice to all t under all the circumstances of ti nev.General) should support the * Mr. LOCKHART denied tha motion would imply a censure ripe The fault was in the system, andi burning, and integrity of that N found ineffectual to edministerjt est argument in favour of the me of 901. could not be recovered in without risking the loss of 100/. called upon to do any act, but a to inquiry, and be saw no reasol lion, especially as no blame wa , trickish Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW opp proposed to separate the polit character of the Lord Chancelk grate to be discussed in the pre the Session. Mr. WILLIAM SMITH spol lion. It appeared that the arrei greater were it not for the lode present Lord Chancellor, and ti tied him (Mr. S.) that there wa the system. The importance witted, and the motion could in at a censure. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR replied the Court of Chancery, for be nell—(A laugh)—and be wot / i 4 Money rather than enter it. number of causes had been sis t peals had very considerably it ing the admitted labour and ab ceilor. The maxim of our and itts , ice shoald not be sold, it ~I,onld not be delayed ; and It candid 6.111 whether the sport] ecru did not demand imittiry not only of the property, hut n ril tnind of the subject. Indeed in the Court of Chancery was' he was tlcterinked to take the hi. motion. 1 Strangers were then orders House divided upon the origi appeared For the Motion, 52;—A r;ty, 4. I pon our re-admission into tl.e Marquess of LONDONDLR) 1 it 16 reference to the office of i 1..i.d, an of the abolition t atomended by a Committee o Lad now become vacant, any i ; s Noble Martprnis) its duties w oil any increase of emolumen '.• i t the office of Keeper of the Sig t if t'sat person the two offices lit , , g , ther. The Noble Marques I Li. legs he would call the at , ' 5 ti:e Poiice Regulation Bill. lic.sir suggested by several might hereafter be made ava was proposed to pass the Bil . . . , . temporary measure for one y 1 • Mr. UOULBURN brough . cl i live to the Colonies. Mr. J. P. GRANT wisher t Lt ii,trittleti to bring the questi i • . ! b. fore P.trllament next Stasi Mr. ROBINSON said, ; i l 5r....11 intention. .1 , 11 M r . J. P. GRANT then , . i t attention sio n. of . ':::rt;:n to call thefutitreo occasion. 1 1 t Mr. W. SMITH %%Ward t Honourable Gentleman al ;thy alteration of the Law ri Th. , (I.I.INCF,LIOR of 11 , •- that as the grievances for • ' ,' . been in a great measure ret 1 ' . teution to propose an altera • I, 1 " :: PARLIAMENTA Mr. S. WORTLEY row mustier, the object of whi I cr elli•prs of Mr. Burton, 1 Itst Patliament, for loss t order of that House in sal Home %could recollect that - ' I ,% 1 ,•, in the Fleet for debt at t 1 4. :i ..! I l i : 4, h Tr a c t da ni h t , e , ar o !, - p a c s sh o rtlyloi commenced a,t,,ieonnce di e , f y t a e n r i :2 the Fleet for an escape, a the House to be a high I creditors were excused ft I" the Rouse to answer for t k i withdrawing the suit. I i , . stood, when a party was competent authcrity, the • # Ile had looked into the I out of the case of Sir J. t execution, after he had That Act gave a power execution again within a lege of the debtor had c lithe Act applied only it execution after theirelec 1 , 1 I t. ( actually in execution at amount of the debt due I was 1000/. and the why carved might be tettimate 11 1 circumstances, be shoal itself into a Committee an Address to his Maje, a sum of money to the i sation for their tom. ' of justice to the indivi, further, for be wished 1 motion to the House persons ineligible to a 1 _ 11. THE STATES' actually in execution for debt at the time of their offering themselves as candida tes. Mr. WYNNE did not thiak that this was a case at all calling for the interference of Parliament. He could not conceive any thing to he more explicit than the Act of Charles I. on that subject. That Act dis tinctly stated that the privilege of Parliament did not operate beyond the period of the Session in which it was exercised. Under these circumstances the parties had nothing to do hut to cause a new writ of wen- ' tion to be issued, n itli which the House could not in terfere: nor could the exercise of that privilege on a former occasion at all prejudice the case of these cre ditors. With respect to the resolution the Hon. Mem ber spoke of, it went to make an alteration in the law of a very grtve nature, and he was not prepared to ad mit such an alteration, without adequate deliberation. The Hon. Gentleman might bring in his Bill to OA ef fect, and it would be then time to discuss the matter fully. As to the parties themselves in this case, which the lion. Gentleman had brought under the consider ation of the House, he did not think they ought to complain of the treatment of the House, as the House had been extremely lenient towards them, and would have been justified in prosecuting all that were con cerned in that suit against the Warden of the Fleet. Mr. S. WORTLEY, in reply, said, that according to the view lie took of the Act quoted by the lion. Gentleman, it was defective as regarded a case of this kind. The case of the parties interested in this matter was aggravated by the circumstance that Mr. Burton was a man of excellent property, and well able to pay the debts for which he had been taken in execution. His imprisonment wa s merely a nominal one, as he had met him at the Doncaster Races in the midst of it. The law did not meet this question, and he thought it would be an act of injustit I! on the part of the House if they did not endeavour to make amends for the in jury their interference with the law had inflicted. Mr. BARING thought that sufficient rcason bad been urged why couiperi,ation ought not to be granted in this case. With respect to the state of the law on this subject, he thought the statement of the. lion. Member (Mr. S. Wortley) exhibited a state of things which ought not to be permitted to exist. It was nut long since that aa individual confined in the King's Bench Prison, made his way through that I loose out of the kingdom alt Tether ; ani many frauds of a si milar description had been practised under the shield of the privilege of Parliament. Ile thought they ought to revi:.e their rules as to the qualification pro perly required for a seat in that House, and en.leavour to counteract them, sa as to meet eases of this kind. The question was then put and negatived without a EXCIII:QUEIt RILLS. Mr. MABEI:LEI' rose to briit4 forward the dis• cussion of w! he had given notice, relative to the partiality shown by Government, and tie hiss conse quently sustained !iy the pi6lic, in making Loans front particular quarters, instead of going into the public money market. He hal before alluded to this subject, and particularly adverted to the rate of inter est given to the Batik of Ireland in the loans which bad heeti mad: from that boil,, and directed the at tention of the House to an extensive issue of Irish Treasury Bills, wlii , h had taken place in 1616, in consequence of a great sum of money borrowed of the Bank of Ireland at five per vent. interest. That sum bad not vet, he believed, been all repaid, so that we were now paying four per cent. (the amount having been reduced to that) for money, which we might pay oft by other money burrowed in this country, at three per emit. In ord'r to show the amount which hail been lost to the public consequence of these improvident luaus from the Bank of Ireland, lie troutd show by t h e returns on the table the amount of the unfunded debts in Iris!: Treasury Bills, from the year 1815, up to the present time. That would be found to be— In 1816 .C2.500010 In 1919.......14.030.000 In 1818 . 2,497.109 In 11420 4.1:)11.4.100 In 1817 5.:M1.991 ID 1821 3,300,000 In 1818 3.609,900 The state of the proportions held by the Banks of England and Ireland during that period, was one mil lion for the former. and two millions fur the latter and during the whole of t hat period the rate of 5 Fer cent. for the first year, and I per cent. for every year follow ing was paid to the Batik of Ireland. lie would con trast that with the rate of interest paid to the mer chants and bankers of London. on the same security at the same period. The House would be aware that the rate varied c insisterably, and that there were no official Returns by tvlsich any accurate view of the question could be given ; but lie believed the statement he had made was perfectly correct. By that statement it appeared that the rate of interest on Excheqtter Bills was in the early part 1815 at 3ed. per diem. making an annual sum of W. 6s. 5i4. The latter part of the same year it was 341 per diem, making annually 41. 18s. 104 d. In the beginning of 1816 it was 30., and at the latter end it was 3d., making the animal rate of interest 41. I Is. 3d. In ISI 7, at the beginninsr, it was UAL, making annually 31. 16s and at the latter end it was 2d. per diem, snaking per annum :s/. Hs. 10d. On all of these Bills Ouvernwe'nt hada premium of Ss., consequently an abatement to that amount was to be made for the interest. Comparing these rates of inter est with those paid to the Bank of Ireland, it would be seen that had the money been borrowed from out of the money market in this country. there would have been a saving to the public. In 1818 ..C12.49.9 In 1819 llOB.OOO In 1847 92,000 In 1820 . 94,000 In 1818 .. 123.000 making a total of 400,000/. and upwards. After these statements, it would not be necessary for him to make any observations. Ile merely contended that there ought to be a fair competition, and no preference given to any body whatever in borrowing money for the pub lic service. The motion he had to make was, That it is the opinion of this House, that it is expedient that the same rate of interest should he given on Irish Treasury Bills, as on Exchequer Bills." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER spoke in so low a tone of voice, that we lost the greater pall of his observations. We understood him to contend gene rally, that it would not be expedient at the present mo• went to pay off the remainder of the debt to the Bank of Ireland, by means of a loan from the English mousy market at three per cent. as this transfer from this coun try to Ireland, would occasion a loam of two per cent. on account of the exchange, and as it was only proposed he the operation to save one per cent., there would remain a loss on the whole done per rent. He hoped therefore it would be seen that there was no want et economy in continuing to pay four per geol. for that money., With respect to the bargain wade la 1016, that was a period of great pressure mid distress. He need nni recall all the circumstance+ which led to that state of•things, but the sudden removal of all the war taxes had fumed Go vernment to make some heavy losses. The House knew that in 11419, the debt of Government to the Bank of England was tiS,OOO,OOO/. It was urged that the imme diate repayment of the debt to the. Bank of Ireland would cans,- a beneficial circulation to the Irish market ; hot it Ishould be borne in mind, that the Exchequer Bills did not float about in the Irish market as they did in England. It was true that the interest of money was very low just now in this country ; but the demand of a loan might make an alteration in that respect, and he did not think the Bank of England was disposed just now to make any further advances. Mr. MABEILLEY did not think the Right Honour able Gentleman had given any answer to his complaint, which was, that a preference was given to the Bank of Ireland, and sometimes to the Bank of England over the Merchants and Bankers of this country, who were entitled to consideration from the readiness they had ever evinced in meeting the demands of Government when they wanted money. He could think there would be a loss of two per cent. on the exchange, in the event of transferring money from this country to reland. lie thought himself bound to take the sense of he House on this qnestion. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER ex- plained. Sir J. NEWPORT said that there was no period when it was more necessary ti) extend the circulating mediuin r.f Ireland than the present. He had before asserted, and he nice repeated, that the experiment had never been fairly tried of passing Exchequer Bills in Ireland. 'flte Bank of Ireland always monopolised them, and those who were de.irons of possessing them found great diiliculty in attaining their object. The Horse then divided, when the numbers were : For the Motion, 31—Against it, 6-1--Majority, 33. lONIAN ISLANDS. On our re-admission to the liallerv, we found Mr. HUME on his legs, moving for the production of a copy a a memorial plesented to his slajesty's(io. vernmei.t, tined by certain Inhabitants of the island of '.ant", and prevented by Signor Rossi. Also for a c ipy of a Memorial from certain inhabitants of %ante, presented by Signor Spiridone, Agent of the lonian polka, witi a t.tatetnent explanatory of the causes of the detention of cc: tain inhabitants of that island in 1819. Mr. GOCI.IIUILN opposrd the motion. As to the first Memorial, it proposed, in effect, a subversion of the Constitetion of the Island, and was drawn up by an officer in the service of the Oovernment, by which he was dismissed, in consequence of the circulation of that Memorial throughout the Colony. This was a proceeding of which he assumed that no considerate person could disapprove. But more, this person was exelmled from the Assembly of which he was a Mem ber, for having viula•ed an oath which he had taken to that Aszeitiblv, and for which violation proceedings had been commenced against him. With rv , .pect to the secon I Memorial to which the Hon. Member for Aberdeen had adverted, there was no such Memorial at present in the office. Mr. HUMP, made a few ob: , ervations in reply. M A ItItYATT thought for the honour of those entrusted wil.b the gov..rtiment of the lonian isles, as well as for the honour of the 6ovetrament at home. the Papers ought to he produced, as without them the Muse could nut form a judgment on the merits of the case. The motion% were then severally put. The first was immediately negatived. The Gallery was cleared for a division ou the second, but we understand it was finally lost withont a division. When strangers were re-admitted, Mr. Hruz was sahmittin4 a snot' to the !louse for an Address to the King, f,r a Copy of a Memorial on the tuhject of Grievances co:told:titled of in the lonian Islands, and fur an Account of the number of persons put to death by Martial Law, on the occasion of the Insurrection at Santa Maur*, in hilt/. Sir J. NEWPORT thought there was a great deal in the human Isles that ought to come before the (louse. If this country was to he considered the protector of the lonian Isles, it ought to be so in reality. Mr. tiOl: ',BURN said, if the Hun. Baronet thought proper to bring forward a motion on the subject, he should be perfectly relay to meet it, and to prove that the engagements of this country with respect to the lonian Isles had been faithfully filfilled. He moved to have out all the words of the original motion after the word " that," for the purpose of inserting words, praying fur " Extracts front any Despatches received from Major G:tient! Frederick Adam, relative to the Insurrection in the Isle of Santa Maura, in 1819." Mr. lIGMF, oliirrvell, what he wanted was an ac count of the state of the jail. What the Hon. Gentle man proposed to give him was the statement of the jailer. Mr. GOULBCRN did not know that the lonian Islands bore any resemblance to a jail, or that Ma jor-General Adam had any thing in common with a jailer. The motion was then negatived and the amendment agreed to. GRAMPOUND DISFRANCHISEMENT BILL: Lord MILTON moved, that the amendments made by the Lords to the Grampound Disfranchisement Bill should be taken into consideration. His Lordship was anxious to guard against being supposed to approve of the amendments which had been made in the Bill. Ile was of opinion, that that House might better require the Lords to adopt their view of that subject, than the Lords could call on them to agree with their amendments. Nevertheless, as he should he sorry to lose the Bill alto gether, which must be the conseqeence of their rejecting these amendments, he could wish the House to agree with them, to convince the public that they were not playing with the subject. He thought the Bill as sent up to the Lords was better than the Bill as now amended, but for the reason lie hail just stated, lie was disposed to concur with the amendments of their Lordships. Lord J. RUSSELL seconded the motion. Mr. C. W. WYNN thought it would have been a more Parliamentary course for their Lordships to have agreed to the Bill for Disfranchising the Borough of Gratnpound, and sent down a separate Bill to dispose of the franchise thus rendered vacant. He was of opinion that the county of York would be worse off with four representatives than it was at present with two. The m easure would throw great additional influence into the West Riding, and it would have the effect of greatly Augmenting the expenses of elections. The consequence ~. persona of overgrown fortune/ the amendments r o e i t i t 1 r : t e n d fot rejecting aretild he, that none but that be woul dthis so b e strongly, likely the county. Ide f e l t of the Lords, he felt disposed to suggest other ammo. ments. He could wish to see the county of York (if it returned four menitiers to Parliament) divides into two parts, and would, if it seemed to meet the views of th e House, submit to them a proposie • ' ion for giving te te members to the West Riding, includine. the city b of y el l , and the other two to the North Riding. If the H o y e should approve of this arrangement, he should haw to follow it up by proposing other amendments. Mr. S. WORTLEY was relieved by what had L i n n from the Noble Lord and the Hon. Gentleman w ee saying what he should have otherwise felt it necnstry to offer. The reasoning of the Hon. Gentleman I th • Le osgat quite conclusive. Though be was one of the Mather * for the county of York he assured the House that ea this occasion he spoke hut as a Member of Parliassor. The Lords had placed the House of Commons, ss it ip. peared to him, in a vety cruel situation, by sealing down a Bill so amended at such a time. The Hoax „f Commons after much discussion had passed a gill to Disfranchise Grampound, and to transfer the Elerti te Franchise thus rendered vacant to the Borough of teed , . The Lords fairly changed the Bill, and instead of girieg what the {louse of Commons wanted, mingl e , two Burgesses, they said, " No, we will not give rs two Burgesses, but we will give you two Knights of the Shire." To him it appeared that that House was more peculiarly the judge of the way in which it ought to he L c onstituted. He did not mean to deny the right of the Lords to interfere in such cases, but he thought they ought not to do so but on mature consideration. The change which had been made in the bill went to increase the influence of the Peers in the House of Consume% He thought much inconvenience would result to the country from such a change, that the private business would not he managed so well as at present, and that the expsoises that would fall on the suitors for private bills wools) he much greater than they had hitherto Leen. 'lle had conversed with Voil:shireinesi of all parties on the subject, and found that all classes cont em pl a t e d t h e proposed change with fear and apprehension. Speak ing merely as a Memlier of Parliament, he in Isis eon science believed, that a greater misfortune could not fall on the county of York than it would sustain if this bill passed. He was decidedly against the division of the county, but he could assure the Honourable Gentian* that he was not mistaken in thinhing that it would throw all the additional influence into the West Riding. The county was divided between the manufacturing and the landed interests, and it would be seen from the kis tory of the last fifty or sixty years that the returns lad been very fairly divided between the Ninth amid Wert Ridings. lie thought it was not for that house to adopt a hill which it did not approve, because such a meanie would be better than nothing. Ile did not think the, ought to agree to pass a bill which would satisfy nobi dy, and it would be inure satisfactory to the public, that they should not do so, but that they should pass the DU franchising Bill, and leave it to be determined by as other Bill to what place the vacant franchise shoild be transferred. The present Bill now thrown oat, nether could be introduced fur the disfranchisement of One pound (to which measure their Lordships stood pledg ed), which might pass in the present session. i this so strongly, that it was los lutention to take the sense of the House on the proposition that tboyabseld mit agree to the Lords' Amendment. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY simnel, that although he generally agreed with his Ressataltis Friend who had just sat down, he could not do as ea the present occasion. 'fhe Lords bad only encased their just right in giving the Bill the shape whichthey thought most expedient ; for although lie allowed that it was the peculiar privilege of the House of Comment , guard the purity of time representation, be contesisi that to confine the greater question of a modificatioa of that representation to any one branch of the legi slature, was a principle unknown to the constitution. The Noble Marquess, after some further remarks, ex pressed his determination to support the ameodreeats of the Lords, reserving to himself and to the Boast. the right of making such alterations as might be deem ed adviseable at any future period. Lord J. RUSSELL said, that though his object was not fully attained by the Bill as it now stood, yet be would support the proposed amendments, as they did not interfere with the great principle of the Bill. It appeared that there was great intricacy in acquiring a knowledge of the science of lumbers in that House. It was held that five persons were necessary to discharge the duties of Barons of the Exeheqner in Scotlasd; the number of Lords of the Admiralty, it was said, must n . ily be six, and now the Honourable Mem ber for Yorkshire (Mr. Wortley) maintained that the ember of Members necessary to attend to the interests of Yorkehire must be neither more nor less than two. —(Hear, hear.) Mr. Smyth (of Cambridge), Mr. Wilberforce, and Lord Milton supported the amendments. Mr. R. MARTIN (of Galway) MO a few words i s opposition (as we understood) to the Bill. Strangers were ordered to withdraw, bat the floats did not divide. The Amendments were then read a first time. Os the question that they be read a second time, Mr. W. WYNNE made some observotions, which were not distinctly heard in the Gallery; after shish the Amendments were read a second time, and were agreed to. Lord MILTON then gave notice, that he would to morrow move for leave to bring in a Bill for term' ing the manner of taking the Poll at Elections in the County of York. The House would perhaps hereto objection to have the Bill read a first time to-morrow, and the second reading might be postponed to a wure convenient period. The Marquess of LONDONDERRY moved tee Order of the day for receiving the Report of the Committee of Supply. On the question being pa—. CONSTITUTIONAL ASSOCIATION. Mr. BROCOHAM said, he felt it his duty to call the attention of the llonse a second time to the Per ceedings of an Association, calling itself •% Constite. tional," established without are l aw, and acting golely and entirely upon its own authority.—(llear, hear.)-- He had before expressed his surprise at the nature 041 proceedings of this Societe, but that surprise w aif mach increased by what had since conic to his knowle(lge with respect to its conduct. Ile held in his hand the copy of a letter, a circular , whi ch had been not 114 distributed among all the Members .4 the Arsorfatloo, but which this Society. unknown to the ""`" 1" —not recognised by the I..er a the I.ll4—ha l to sent to whom ?—To the whole of the Nlaessfilia of 6uglaad.--Q Bridge-street Coe body of the State, of l a w, and issuii Itogilltricy of th t h e object of the sagacious and ab instruct the Um political libel; n written and pub' Wiling their opl the law of libel, the Magi -trate... be considered as w ith public just traurdinary circ not mean w den lawful for one o dictutent, bet iv by large b ales ' moods the (Peel true dust litany poem Powe" . Bilis of istlietn Society, whose suspicion, who of the Attotnei diettnent ; and to instruct the their duty. %'as their es wuel.l leave cater t it Honorary At dons! Associa was the Circa' directed by thi whom was the that the MAO Cuutsuittee thi Couinsittee wa bets in that H , Council, or of to issue Prod; on to state, th ( o f which Res Magistrates Is toted several bellous public been abandot Pressed thrir to whom? Il ary Secretary . Committee, w were grariot ings by ents. " And upon of their rem. rpirstion, an! ment not to e ture."—Ole; of such an A. ever bear of 'Croft nil to bril , g then grapple with submission to street, Mack the whole of of which th were to be di And now he ?dentin:riot city that oat a tegnlar list Attorney-le backward ii also the Sea who had n 4 or in issuini of the Coot circulars n nut any nisi Lions of thii then, he de constituted to the :ilag subscribed. lastly, the] lisbed wit note be knew n before be sition of tl keeper, an exempted ther state, fora few the partie cunistanei that fact ment. Hi street Co (Hear, he J. B. Sim interpret. slits trod ta:ing to state, torione u be tried to him tl bad thus He was i the Hem subscribe each not by suds spect, of enlated sad to c, which Ji to knoll lived an Noble L stab ser ib this the sad Kee Midair I _k