The Statesman. — London, England, 1823-11-20 00:00:00

COURT OP CH A'NCEi446,Nov. 19. • '4 - i . Me....Dgewett and Mr. remain were in further 'rapport of the argument fee setting aside the last verdict. and granting a new trial. Tile LORD CUANCELLOR did not know that it weak, be necessary to go on with the argument. At say rate; it Ltuldtbe melees to hear the other side until after the tistmas vacation. If the third trial were to take place, ire would order it to be a trial at bar. If it were not to taNiphee, then the other side had only to apply for fur thee directions, and have the revise disposed of. COURT OF NINO'S BENCH.—Nov. 19. EY Ten DATTeR OP JOHN TKURTILL. Mr. COW: said be had to apply on behalf of this 'tun. vidosl for a neutulames, to the Magistrates of Hertford, Offering them to admit the prisoner to a conference with Lie Yelic tar. Mr. Justice Bere.—ls the prisoner fully committed. Mr. Ceirry.—Yes, my Lord, and 1 apply ender the • previsions of the 4th of Oeo. 4th, which provides that per , toes shall be admitted to prisoners under certain roles and '4`itiettlations made by the Magistrates, to enable parties ac. „,. Allied to pietism for their defence, at the tim e of their trial. . t ' The LORD Cuter Jorrice observed, the Act of Paella . Melt gave authority to the Magistrates to decide as to who • • Mould be admitted to prisoners, and who should not. Mr. CHITTY acknowledged that it was so; still the Court • • I , )134 &power to Correct orto r e med y an y misconception tinder _ ' wh'eh Magistrates might act, and here the prisoner bad to coon lain of total exclusion. The Loso Cuter .les - rime-No doubt the Court will do that, but you mud sbew es there Is DO occasion for our int.iference. Mr. Jestice Davirmr..-The Act sayi that. ender proper roles to be made by the Magistrates, persons committed for trial shall be permitted to see such persons as are necessary to enable theirs to nick' their defence. Mr. Justice Be,-r.—Does it appear by your affidavit that ' the prisoner desires to have any person admitted to him, and that the Magistrates have refaced? Mr. Cinema-It does, ny Lord. It is sworn that the family of 'fburtell, who are highly respectable. bail deputed a respectable Attorney of Norwich, to eomnsnnicate with the prisoner as to the steps necessary to be taken for his • • defence. , This Gentlemen. Mr. Jay. had seen the prisoner, i t being itnpossible for him to continue. so far from home • ps I I ert ford, Mr. Jay was desirous of appointing Mr. Fenton TODD Agent, a most respectable gentleman, to ad for t. . , tom. and therefore. we now ask, that Mr. Fenton may be permitted to see the prisoner at propsr times. Mr. Jostion Havcse.—Do you ask to hare two admit ted —Jay and Fenton. Mr. Cm irte.—No, my Lord, tie only desire to hare Mr. Fenton substituted for Mr Jay. Mr. Justice Homwrn.—Haes you applied. Mr. CRITTII.-.-TVII, lay Lord, twice, bet wreltsve been hoth times refused, and we now swear that oertlefenee is g-eitly delayed and impeded by the refusal. . v. Tee Loan Cures JCSTICZ.--Wdiat is your applloation ? Mr. CHIT/T.—Par a rule to show cause why tae prison. Ws Solicitor should Dot be admitted to him at all seasonable timtn. Mr. Justice Berime.—Ratheressy, at all such times as tl.e Mazistrst.s shall think tit. Mr. Justice lIRST.—And leave the time' of the Magistrates. Mr: Cuttu..—Certainly. my Lord, w t' with soy of the proper r e g ular , 'VOW soot* feistier capeessretlea , " "Me Cuter .10,10 D Oltarrredl i = - 41 , P , ^+Wirgwent the wearsekeserwadamar. raver. If the Magistrates had say cr a mild do it on their return to the writ direct that due provision be made, lot proper timer, and under proper restrictions, to John Veered', as his solicitor. Mr. might, as yore Lordships perceive. be ne cessary that Mr. Jay baring once sees the prism*, should ace him again. The Loan Cater JU a r i ca .—The Act ears, person tie persona. Take your writ for both Jay and Fenton. The writ was granted accordingly. CRIMINAL. INFORMATIO*. Mr. ICIIITTT said he had another appl ie d to make WI their Lordships, for a criminal informationageinst the pro prietor of the New Surrey Theatre. A piece bad been, prodaced there, in which were introduced all the materiel farts reported to be coanected with the late merder of Mr. • Weare. Thartell was represented as is company with the reordered man, and the whole exhibition was of the most disgustiog and disgracing description. Magis. trates had, therefore, considered it their duty to interfere to pot it down. The Loan Curer JUSTICS.--liata do you Identify the person against whom you apply as the proprietor. Mr. eat rre.—By his own acknooledgment. my Lord. We move also against tbe printer of the bill an nouncing the performance which is most disgusting in its I haracter. The Loan Cater JUITICIL—Take your role to show the diseretioi BAACCIURN v. MAMMY. -' • • This was an action by a tailor against t ept, fot ss bill of 13/. es. for clothes supplied to his son when I stkior. *lt did not spree that the father gave any authority to the ' plAiintiff to supply the clothes; but he had writtea *lemitod,, etter, offering pay 71. 9s. of the bill, being a fernier d if the tailor would send him a receipt. ' Mr. RoatssoN addressed the Jury for the defendant; rontendiug. that the letter was no proof of a prior agree , went. and that it eonatined a otindipieu which bagi aot bees yeatelied with., The Lear) effigy Jimmie left the Joey. .ill *the the letter. ass evidebee of an original authority. The Jury fottoil, a verdict for the plaindll—" 71.85. ILVISINOTOK V. TRENTiCe. This was an action of trespass. The Veal/lee SellteeANT sired the case. It ippeared that the defendant. having had a rising on the plaintiff of half a guinea, went to the plaintiff's house and demanded his money. Not having been paid, he bemuse extremely violent and insolent; he wor e he would not leave the house until he received the am ount of his detuatiA anti said, although he was not then drool:, he inten•led to get chunk before be left the place. Ile • was accompanied by another peewit. and being determined to make himself as comfortable as possible, he sent out for ' a pot of porter a nd soma p i p es ; be had the pipes lighted, a-d eornmettred smoking and drinking in the bens@ •be (VA( not feel himself mailer any sort of restraint ; he spat about, • made all manner of poise. and treated those who cemonstree t , ql with him io very coarse- and offeasire language; he vent up to the parluur.door, and attempted to force his way Iwo the room, &ling violently upon the plaintiff to come imt ; Come out you. Statesman. pay use my half guinea; If )oa have not the money go awl pledge your shirt for it." Theo farts were stated in evidence by the plsintiff's daughter. Upon the past of the defendant it was urged, (k at he went to the house for the p a y ment of his money, • wilich. tbutighlicall, was to him an object, and that he had • determined to remain there, merely to induce the plaintiff to pay him.—The Jnry ret, rard.a verdict ter the plaintiff . Dameges, Five Podens. . • P.PPLA V. VeeMAX. This was an action at slander. The pl .intlff was an ins ' k. e, , er at Barnet, the defendant followed the same business in the same place.--The slandetons words imputed to sae defendant iser:kreptry and inthlrency ; and special da nage% were laid for the less nntiailled by the p'elutiff by tneas.s of, an execntion having been put into his premises. in collate! army rf the reports circa . 16:ed by the defendant aje.itet 11ius. PAW. cuse . r, 'THE sTA'r EsmAN examines! on behalf of the plaintiff, stated that on the 18th of July lass, he was passing the defend Ines house, be drew np to the door, the defendant came out to him and said, ~ I em surprised you are not in town, Om err is for it—your .neighbour, Pepper, is In the Ga zette The next witness was a post boy, who was inths habit of driiing the plaintiff's chains Ole drove to the defendant's house with a fientlemin ; the plaintiff charged a shilling per mile ; the defendant was in the habit of cis aging Is. 3d.; some observations were made with respect to the charges. upon which the defendant took occasloa W say there was an innkeeper (meaning the plaintiff), who used t Is.. but he has turned bankrupt. • _ . to run at bus For the Defence, a witness of the name of Deckle. who had been for 17 years in the service of the defendant, stated that he was present when it was asserted by one of the defendant's neighbours, that he, the defendant, had said nothing of the plaintiff but what had been stated by Mr. Goodwin at the Cock the night before. Mr. MaRISTATT contended that this war no justification I where the party atteinpts to.jestify on the ground Diet iThe slanderous words were stated by another peruse before they were uttered by the defendant, in such cue it was absolutely necessary to give in evidence that the defeadaet had stated merely and precieely the identical word, wittiest adding to, or taking (rem, the same—it was not eoffingh I. state the substance of the words, bat the precise words were necessary to be given in evidence. •• Adams stated. that, in consignees , of the reporteffiet were pet is circulation, lie felt it his duty So plt etaexeention on the premises ; he did not hear any thiykiFectly from the defendant concerning the iesolvene y ns of AO plaintiff. 'the Cum JUSTICS summed up the evidence, and the Jeri returned a verdict —Damages, One Hundred POIINdS; VINO V. ANTHONY COLLINS. This was a question respecting the liability of parish abets to give relief to persons able to work by the 43t1 of Elizabeth. It was ordered to be resumed on Saturday, is eerier to bear some motions now, before proceeding le Nisi Fritts. • DOTAL CONMANDS TO THI JUDO'S ISLATIVII 'PO Tile • .PUTURS DISPATCH OP BIMINI'S!! IN TIM esticerr. During the sitting of the Court this td., Mr. Le Blane,Clerk of the Crown Office read, by direetioe of their Lordships. a warrant from his Majesty, directed to the Judges. founded on the Act of the last Semi" for re-! g elating the future dispatch of !miners in this Court. . The warrant was dated the 17th of November, and ads veiling to the Act in question, and to the accumulation of business before the Court ; gave the sanction of the Crown for their Lordships to sit in Lincoln's Inn Hall, West minster Hall, Sergeant's lon Hall, or any other place which to the Lord Chief Justice and other Judges should appear convenient, for a certain period previous to the commencement of the next Tern, to dispatch such bo ilerss as might remain uodisposed of at the conclusion of she present Term. The warrens preceeded.to signify his 'Majesty's pleasure that the Judges should inert for this purpose on the 13th of January next, and continue to sit, if necessary, until the first day of the ensuing Term. And his Majesty further directed, that, should the Lord Chief Justice he engaged during such period. in sitting. at Nisi Pries, then the rest of the Ja Iges should sit as ditected, and dispose of all such business as to their Lordships should se- fitting to be considered in the abseece of A (Sittixfs is Basco.) w ; TIII/oTaLL e. sasuarost . r. Mr. Sorriest VAIJOBADI.—.My Lords, I hope 'your Lord. ithipa wiU .flow me fur a moment to call your attention to this cam Your Lordshi . ps will recollect it was an action by Theasas Thurtell against the defendant, to *cover the wales amuse property destroyed by fire. A rate was oh tattled in the present term by my brother Tadq. to chew erase why the verdict should not be set aside tad a new trial granted. Now. my Lords, what I have to request ip. slot you would allow the case to be called on before the, close of the term. There is now, my Lords, as was stated , ptra former day. an indictment for conspiracy a 'Mast the plaintiff in this action. referring bo the out a,, which this rule arose, and that may come be tri before the next term, .11 need not mention w rejud each a rule as this, hanging over the head of t plaiatK , will be calculated to excite: indeed, a great d of pejo. die, bag been already excited. The public pre* has takes tkis affair up. and has teemed from dey,to datirith state. meats calculated to pollute the very sources, of justice Waif. I bops. my Lords, you will. um* thee* eircum- Booms, allow the case to come on this term. I have the less difficulty in making this request, as the elite itself' stands very high on the list of motions foe new tele*. Mr. Sergeant Pau. (who is engaged along with Sergeant Vaughan in the case) followed on the same wide, and !ant sally urged the Court to allow the case to one to a hear. leg this terns. Mr. tastiest BUIttOGGIL—ITow do we knowNridati way the feats of the ease may lead us to decide? Without effkring an (Onion one way or other, for the facts are not yet before us, any not the deilsion which this Court "night be inducqd to come to, be as likely to prejudice your client, as the stations by sofferieg the rule to stand our? nut we do not thbfk that the I party for whoa you apply can be prejudiced limy thing OVA has hitherto passed In this Court. Mr. Sergeant V tuonaw.—my Lords, with greet fuhlsission, era do think that the partied may be prejittlicediry the delay. rhoreat deal of prejediee baegone abroad on the e. It may perhaps become the ground of theatrical represeirth ►; and t !alive that in fact part of It has become so s i r es * Mr. Justice Peng.—We cannot take upon ourselves to glee e decision on so important a cause as this, in the present state of the Court. (At present only two of the Judges sit daily.— Ins Lord Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Richardson are ab-i condition Perhaps before the end of the term, the Court may be le a condition to hear the cue; bat uuder the circumstance of this having been tried by one of ourselves (the learned Judge himself), we cannot at presut proceed with It. If it were a cue which had bun tried by any of the dodges of the other courts, we would do our best with it; but there being now only two Judges present. one of whoa tried the case, we cannot allow it to come on. Mr. Justice Bustacitiou.—l cannot think the public can be so weak as to be prejudiced on any olds of the question by what his already passed in this court. Here the subject dropped. ELLISTOIN WIBITHR. Mr. Sergeant Terror said, he was empowered, on the part of the plaintiff. to consent to grant a stet processor, which had been recoannendeti by the Court. Mr. Serpent VAUGHAN took upon himself to consent to accept it, although his client wished to have limo :to comsat,. elute with th.• defendant, who ass at present in the:country. Mr. Justice PAN% said, he had exercised a soinisiAliscretiou In accepting the offer. A stet proceirus was accordingly entered. • PREROGATIVE COUr CIAISIENTIVIN Sir John NICHuLL proceeded t case to day, which related to the merit of the late Rev. Mr. Caght Wight in 1821 where he had a the nephew. of the deceistri, they were both appointed joist execntors of his property. wl 8,0001. This sill continued cooed imbibing.* suspicion that ifo72 Witt wade a snand el ~.y . . --- .appointed Hodson, who was a solicitor, his sole executor and ,residuary legatee. the deceased having bequeathed 1001.trach to all his nephew. and nieces in the first degree, who, it happened amountednearly .5,0001. .of the property was then disposed of. The suspicion with which Clementson was charged bring at length removed from the mind of the deceased, and lie being again restored in his full favour, the dereased,by a new will, made in 1821, pat him in the same state he was in by the will of 1816. 1 his was the history of the will previous to the codicil, which it was alleged the deceased made in March 18. d. and which was the question is the pre sent cans., in which the deceased revoked the will of 1821, and left all his property to Hodson alone. The Learned Judge after going through the evidence at great length, observed that it was against legal testimony or rational proha• bility, that this codicil was made oa the date which was afllatid to it. It was against the evidence adduced in this case, that the deceased could have subscribed his name to this codicil without the assistance of some person, for it was proved he Was nearly blind, being then 87 years of age; and yet that per son was not brought forward. However, that the codicil was in the baud writing of the deceased seemed to be admitted, and this rendered it probable that the codicil was made subs'• qoent to the will of 1816, when he was displeased with Cle mentson, end lay from that time till his dea th amon g his p a p ers; besides, it was remarkable that the paper upon which the co dicil was written, and that upon which the will of 1616 was written, both bore the water mark of 1813. Further, it was not proved that any dispute or other circumstance occurred subsequent to the will of 1621, which would induce the de ceased to change his mind. and shut out Clementson from a shore in his property.--Under alt these circumstances, the moral conviction of Ids mind was, that he would not be doing justice, if he did ant declare the will of 1821 to be good and valid, and the codicil of 18.211 utterly void. TOonnion C. wee WIRCUTORS Or TUORITON. This very singular case arose out of the will of the late Colonel Thornton, of sporting celebrity , wh o died in FUSCO in March l ast. The circtoratasees of the Cave were as follow:—Colonel Thornton, of Falkner Hall, in the East Riding of York shire, possessing considerable property in England, went to reside in Paris in 1815, a n d having.purchased some pro perty about sixty miles from that capital, wished to ni..lre France his permanent residence. and obtained from th e King of grange a Royal Ordoonanee , be stowin g upon him the title of the Marquess of Pond, and granting him a domicile in that country, thus allowing him all the right.; political and civil of a h rench citizen, so long as he resided in it. After some time be cornea back to England where be makes a will in due form and manner, bequeatl.ing almost all his English propetty to a mistress with whom be had lived, sod her issue, to the exclusion of his wife and son. After a short residence here, he returned to France, where he died. The will was made, regi , tereil, and found in England, but the executors, on applying for the probate of the will, are opposed by the widow of the deceased, on the ground that Colonel Thornton, having been domiciled in France, and died in that duniCile, his will. and the distribution of his property is fised. The reason of wishing to subject the rill to the licnts of France in the present case is this, that they pre vent any person from disposing of all his property to his adulterous issue, to the exclusion of his legitimate chil i dren. Dr. BARNAIIII and Dr. PIRILLIMORS, for the executors, contended that, conformable to the principle laid down in Orotius ;nd Valtel, the distribution of property should be lade according to the laws of the country where the will made and ft ' except where the deceased died in *.e, and then be made conformable to the laws I, oniciled at the time of his - allekiikon pleaded mt. , as . not cite the law of was a law, and known to every one, ell . according to the law of Fiance, as lsid down in 1 Napoleon, which was conformable to the Ronan law, from which it was tatc.m, the will was void .only when the testator entirely passed over his legitimate offspring, and seemed not to have them in memory, but in the present cue Colonel Tborntois bequeathed to his son 1001. Dr. q.blontwirrow argued at length on the other side, that the distribution of property sboold be conformable to the lowed the country where the testator was domicilicll at the time of his death, and relied mainly upon the opi-1 pions of lairds Mansfield, Hardwicke, and Thurlow, as cittd in similar cases. The Learned Doctor further main tailed, that the very admission that the distribution of property should follow the les loci donsicilii, in case of the party dying intestate, Inferred that it should follow the same rule also, in case of a will, for where could the fact of intestacy be triad, but in and according to the laws of the domicile ? Farther argument was postponed till the next Court day. POLICE. Mauston Houss.—About three years and a half ago the house of the Rev:-- Fitxthomas, of Sudbury, was broken open in the night by robbers, who entered by the Means of a centre-bit. with which they bored the window shutter. A great quantity of plate and other Tadash. property was taken off, amongst which were some s i lver candlesticks, which bad been nearly a century in the family.—Soon afterwards three men were appre- ' betide() on suspicion of being concerned in the burglary, and tried at the Assizes, where two of theca were convicted and executed. It was generally believed that there were other'persoas connected with those who had suffered and a reward wits offered for the apprehension and conviction of any who might have been so engaged. Until a few days. ago, however, no tidings wets receieyd either of thieves or property, although regular advertisements bait Wen made of the robbery. Me. Fitsthernu was in the habit as he walked aleng . tbe simile of lookinginto the silversmiths' and pawnbebkers' .01 but bad long since given op all idea of findi n g an y of Is lost pfoiwrry, sone of which be had ever recovered with the exception of an 'old umbrella, a pate of his wife's shoes, and a few other trifles, which were produced upon the i trial, and led to the conviction of the two housebreakers., He accidently looked in at the window of the shop of Mr. Simmons, a jeweller in Holborn, and there be saw, to his astonishment, a pair of the old candlesticks of which his house had been robbed. He forthwith procured a search warrant at the Justice-room (certainly An unnecessary precaution), and proceeded to search Mr. Simmons' pre. inises. He however found nothing mere of his property t t i b t a i n n k t h p e r o t RD Marfa& ; and yesterday the complaidaa t and defen pweor t c o a n r e d s l i t; t n i c w k i s t , h a o n u d t t t h h o e s a e m b o l r im . Simmons w which c h h d e i d i n l ad o t Yee fur them. the rase was therefore 'referred to the ut attenchle at the Justice room. Mr. Fitzthoosss stated the circumstances of the burglary . and roabery, and identified the two candlesticks, which were also identified by his wife, who had a more accurate ricellection of the sulkies which had been stolen. Mr. Pitathomas observed in the coarse of his statement, that the silent manner in which this extensive robbery had been committed, was probably most favourable to twin in one t, for he had left a loaded fowling•piere in his stilly, strt ris gt the robbers-visited, and would doubtless have been favoured with its contents hid he heard any noise, for I,is first impulse would have been to go down stairs with his pistols. VIM was, be said, no other property of hi , amongst the stock oflir. Simmons. - i 1. The Loan &Items asked Mr. Simmons what tiljection he epuld have to deliver up the property to the prreou who had 'been plundered o( it. . Mr. Simmons s„iisi the candlcstir'in hukbeen brought to ' t his shop by a I#)y, who dosimrsup in a Islichney coact), and i who bad the appearencePf.heluginisteets dutch properZ ,and perhaps of ap estabilehamot. -She wished to InuterVie Most she could get, Wins told that the articles sere' of Ito value to the shop except as old silver. The olTet, stile Raid, she had been made in other shops was ds. 94. an mince, and as lie (defenlant) had received a Port of order for 3 pair of can Ilesticks of the kind, he consented to give her This occurred about right months ago. There nothing suspicious in the conduct or appearance of t h e 'a4y. who was accompanied by a young gentleman, and be (defendant ) thought himself justified in making the punits... flic I. oar> MATOIL—But Mr. Fitsthomas swears they are his property, and you can't object to deliver them opto him. Air. Simmons said he had bought them in an open market, and had exposed them for sale in an or.:n market—ia public shop. The LORD 11AYOR—Barnet is en open markets yet vei, will not say that if I buy a horse there which has Ve t e stolen from you, it at ill not be very bard upon you that I should keep pore...ion of it? Mr. Siininims said, he believed he was legally entitled to wt. •itever he purchased in an open market. The LORD MAYOR was convinced that he should act legally in ordering the property to be given up to Mr. Pitztlionias. If shopkeepers chose to run the risk of •but ing goods of people whom they know nothirig about, •they must take the couseqeences. Had proper prevention been used, perhaps more of the stolen properly would have beeo recavered, and more of the persons concerned been brought to justice. air. Simmons said, that in a case of a similar description at another office, be was coneidered entitled to bold the property, having puichwed it in a public market. The LORD Mali. its said, the decisions of other offices wee, nut to controul that in which be sat, lie would, haircut?, very willingly give Air. Simmons an opportunity of getting the best advice oo the subject; at the same time, that M. Mohler was, from his experience, extremely well qualified me ' &Me upon the merits of the caw. M.. HORIAIR said, he haul no doubt upon it. The want et caution in the conduct of Mr. Simmons might be consider / 4 as defeating the en Is of justice, and Mr. Fitzthoinas was entitled to his property. Mr. Simmons thanked the Lord Mayor for giving bin On opportunity of obtaining legal advice. and observea that • great part of his stock might depend upon the decision. Bow StRIRT.--.TRR HAZARD PLATIRS.—This ease, which had been appointed toe farther hearing yesterdat, again went off.—The accused—following toe advice si their Counsel (Mr. Andrews), did not appear; but Mr. Aftalphua waited upon the Magistrate, and informed h:a •, that be had conferred with Mr. Andrews, who, he I was prevented from attending by sonte other h01e..,„ and it was their mutual wish that the matter stand over altazether until next Tuesd te. The Magistrate (0. It. Mtssises.h. Esq.) made no oh. jection, and it VI ss postponed accordingly. LAW STATIONIRY.—Jaae Gotitoni, or Gobriesni, thr woman who accused herself of hiving assisted in roh‘ine Mr. Hooper, of Carey Street, of a large Inantity of lie stamps, was brought up fur re examination. when sic thought fit to declare that she had accused herself wrong folly, and that her motive for so accusing herself was hope to get sent out of the country. The Magistrate told her be could not piste the lead et. lianceon her word, either one way or tire other—and st the watchman deposed that he saw her knocking at M. Hooper's door late on that night in which the robbery Mrs committed. she was remanded for another examination. Whlht she was before the hi sgistr ste t a'gentlem in (JI . . Firm y, of Bedford Row. we believe,) representiug his.' ,solf as Secretary to the Law Society. complained to to L.4forship of a wend which had . gone a4read. setting irgli that many solicitors of presumedrespectability ewe encouraging the piander of the Law Stationer., by kin:- chasing stolen stamps at less than their imp d V.W.a This report, he said, was highly injurious to the protasisgenerally, and be was deputed to ask his Worship, officialv, whether it was true that such a statement had been masts before him as set forth in the newspapers. His Worship replied. that certainly sash a statesmen was publicly made, at the last examination of the er soner, by a person who described himself as a Law bts. tioner, Mr. Sykes. the solicitor to the Stamp Office, sin issued the g-tleroan the report of what paved wit correct. The gentleman expressed his surprise that so anfoualti a statement should have been publicly made by any re spectable law stationer ; and thereupon a conversation re• sued, in which the gentleman disclaimed, on the part tie the profession, all or any participation in the dishonest pray the alluded to ;an I the Magistrate and Mr. Sykes obseret that they had no doubt, either that the charge wee unitises ed. or that it applied only to here and there a dishonest else; who being deputed to purchase stamps occasionally. get tlie * stolen ones below their value, and put the d:11 . • read IV hitrown pocket. Yesterday two Inds were charged with picking the peke of an American Gentleman of a silk pocket lialiilkerchi!: but be not having seen them commit the crisp, althopgh he identified the property. refused to be toss . over to prosecute at the Sessions, alleging that he liov to belts New York before that time. The case, however. bring fully proved by other wilt with the exception of the identi fi cation of the handkeie and Mr. Mistauht, having in vain endeavOu4dt.oeiripa. the foreigner the promotion of the ends ofjustice,we I snfficient inducement to a good citizen to nuke sonser sonal sacrifice, the prisoners were fully coomitted to tab their trial for picking the Docket of agent/4*am nakeees. Oa Tuesday morning two. supposed smogglers,ok whom appeared to have been wounded in the head, tire conducted to Hastings, under a strong armed eseotti Preventive Men, for , examination before the Magistrama afshathe Ohm day, another !bad of tabs was broug;it is if the Hastings officers, and koilited the Custom Ham And on Wednesday, a boat, laden with contrite' spirits, was -c4P. tine 4 „AL sea, lay . the reveeue Waren mAUSION IN LO N D ON.—this very hum0ar0441,414 aft preserves a very gentlemanly and scholar-like tone,in thine' of the most biting sarcasm, contains several envious drew stances, which will cause it, we think, to be much ie rare seems pr in the reading and fashionable cireiv.—A very lucid nee! of the gambling commirteies is made in it, and thes e. i ha nci b p a a l l e c h h a a d ra h c i t s er e?e w o h n o allis a the is ir m rs b m iin ifi g cs h m o lo i; .. k.r ß te 7 , '; the said to be Intended for L—n--. Several gemblisgtr merchants are portrayed in it, and among the rest a eln r A, wine-merebaut and defaulter. Beagle has an eosin lieutenant, as gambling house decoy ducks i n his eq. t ° in described as guilty of murder, and the s-duction of ev, gyman's daughter. He is one of the secret firm for der chase of stolen bankers' parcels ; keeps • seclusion of his male and female vied , house (chapter 6, of the 2,1 volume) for 'ration and murder. These are curious VG merely eolneldeneep. BURR' Bo.—On Tanday, the lith last. At P.Mherhithe, Mt. Philip Hunt. cid,..l son of ' to Hester, ,oungest. daughter of Mr. John Wo On Tuesday, at Leyhourue, in the toasty Mon, Esq. of akreens. in the eouisty ot Kiwi.._ Brook John bridges, and daughter of Sir Heury . awe , . r... DI 4U.—On the 18% lost. at the Wood Houses. wife of T. C. Hard ner. iisq. On the nth last. la his ;;Bth year. Ernest, of this city. Oa Sunday last, at Wandsworth. Richard the late Anthony Sawyer. EVII. of I leywaod Lc and of Lower Brook-street. bro.reour-aviare. On Tends!. Mrs.M.ll‘, ot the Pnlyeon,elontern COAL-MARKET. Ships at Market. Ships sold. 611 Newcastle IS Sunderland Lind= : Printed 14(441111W it the by R. WARDELL, LL.I time to the discretion should appear fitting to be commis% in sue ...a... .. the Lord Chief J make. , - teatle according to the laws of the c onnt d, we have no wish to The Loan Caine du,vics.—The Gentlemen of the liar was made and found, except where the Ogden* of the prison. w ill t a k e no ti ce . t A s e i K di cocc to hi s m4,, ty , , tom . testate, and then it was to be made conic • . ~.. .--.;,. -, ... aitw a wr i.,a,4l, • Vas / 4 s . i ii.t hi, i ge , d n o * g th e °l a ths a n d nitre it was domiciled 1 Court was dispena time ineetittned I s st r . ►4 l7* teniladebat the sad ofi the vete to,shsw Brothers will elfin a room adjoining, to dispose of itch rinse ts shit* Tu..y motions unit other business as may remain %indisposed of at Pewee, whisk was a written law, and k vie i'lasofficient, inasmuch as it did . n Frit. The writ would the conclusion of the next Term. eilif that even according to the law of F for the aduaissioo, at --...-- . in the Code Nepoleoe, which was c ictione, of Mr. Penton COs; BT OF COMMON PLEAS.—N only w PLEAS.--'.for. 19.. Rata* " law' from which it was taa ' ‘a ' i (4;teisos is Banco.) hen the testator entirely passed 4 ea .n4l seemed not to have them ly entered. : ( 4i f t .. ,_, . - 7-• :I . • ' IC: 1; ItT, WLDNXIS:4‘. Y. DODSON., . 1 4 . t 4 give lite!gek ,t fa this e last testate, art sage- -1100 who dirt h s ISle of alk • Both' hies were sail hy & will 0,14& ia Isl 4. tesitittary t-gatevs, aad la. 4 ehicia . awOretvi till sitant for soma I t! ; 1i)1, the. at- ilt Ciente:les%* itlicapJl. - o'.l Ili - ItilS, ar 4 aliich 'ht. g secret orm eps • mad house fed " Las, and an UP for dee-Is of iitibiltf n r ions coineideotf. , ip ut. tu. d P f r , ' 10 1 61 :H s l ict eb r ' .. 1.. r : er 1e.e . "7:4 : c 17 :71 t42 .2' tl Nov, le. 1. Ott s .td • • ••• 42c 0) . 6 ....... .• • •07 the Office, N 0 ...-. Sto L.O. Proprietor. .rt~ei • :4 (, $* 1 1 Ib k 1 ~~ ~w lir SYJ Pi ie . Jai Du Cal 4cr 1 at. es 7 .211 R L E he Ir F .