The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-08-05 00:00:00

iiCALL of Major cum Rwmr, Mr. WOOLEN, AND OTHERS. WARWICKSHIRE ASSIZES, TIUMADIT, Ate. 3. lIIMU C. MUOR CANTMaIVIT, MU. MOOLEU, This cause which has cached so much public in ti•rest, came on this day . befur the l Nice It4wr aad PrOm an tarty hoar every gallery aad b vele the (curt-house was orrupird, and a .mat number of ladies and families of distinction were present. About nine, the Cuter B tnny entered the Conrt, accompanied as usual by the SHRUM, and took his plate on the Bench. The defendants soon afterwards made their appearance, and the venerable Major was ao:eounnorlated with a seat among the Barristers. .Vnongst those present we notit'Pd Mr. Williams, M.P. Mr. Pysche Palmer,ri M. P. both of whom accompanied the defendants into Court, and sat by them. Almost ttp to the moment when the ease fur the prosecution wag closed, the defendants had not derided upon the rrek ise line of defence which they should advt. The Special Jury pannel was then called fur, but only four of the tlentlenten were found to be in at ten lance. The Officer asked if a faits were prayed ? Mr. DeNtltN said, that one of the defendants (P(lntunds) had not vet come into town, and it was' uncertain whether he would join the others in his motion, hr would take it as a favour of the Court to r, urtin fur some little time without proceeding un the Mr. Serjeant V.lrolltN said hr had no reason to throw an obstacle in the way of this acconnuodAtion, if the time required was not unreasonable. Mr. Dammam said, he would nut ask longer than tali o'clock. This interval his Lordship granted. The 0111.eer was now going to call over the names • of the absent Srerial Jurymen, when Mr. DrNMAN rose and said, he had just received a communication from Mr. Pearson, the defendants .it tornry, which, as it IV3S (klieg he would mention to t h e Court. It appeared to him to contain a very s'rong objection to an important part of the proceed ings already taken place, namely, the mode of sum r i.,..ning the Jury. The Learned Cousisel then stated, th,t, under the 311 of tiro. 11. rap. 25. arc. 19, by special juries were re f zeilated, it was required every juror on the Fennel should have received a suunnons to attend the trial ou a clay named in the summons, with a rea-onalde time allowed him before the day on which his pre , clice was required. Now it appeared that Mr. Peed', of lellecot, %visor name s•ood No. 12 in the list, had not received a summons at all to attend on this day ; ra.l though that gen:le e:an had had summonses in other caines as a special juror, not one in the present teas s-r•Til before one or two O'clock this morning. Then, indeed, a sunlit ens was served upon him, requiring his attendance on the 1-4 day of the Assisra, which was the 29th of July; bat as this was never served until the morning of the eti of' Aitgtist, of c,nrse he did not think himself bou•sil to a Jay which was genie by, and consequently • seas not in attendance at all. To (hi. statement of farts, Mr. Penman added the legal arguments, that a jury struck before the parties in the Court aliote • conic! he the only jury to try the cause, and that it nIS not in the power of the She'll)* to amend his re t arc, until an order of Court was obtained for bring the parties again before the Master of the ('rotas lii.ce. Here was a Jury nut the sans which was . i.ruck out above, fur one was absent, not froto any r. i ;leet in his clients, but from inattention in the S. stiff to du his duty. He was prepared with an a davit in corroboration of the farts which he had t rationed, and, he trusted, that when the statement -• made out, his Lordship wonld see that the panne! v i niperfet. Some delay then occurred whilst the affidavit was pr —miring, which Mr. Wooler took advantage of, to ea*: upon the Court to provide accommodation for him a!Lotigst the Barristers ; and he alleged it was neces sary for him as a defendant to be in a place where he c0!....1 take minutes of what passed. The eillarr 13,teori maid, that notch as he wished extend indulgence to defendants, and much as he rer.sielered the anxiety they should feel, still lie timid help thinking the present request for displacing th .t Counsel a little unreasonable. Mr. Wooler intimated th lie might be alloted a s..at without much incommoding these Hentlemen ; bat he did not press the matter farther for the presen', an., sat down again in the situation he occupied be- fors. Mr. DrNMAN now said, that he had the affidavit to which he alluded. • The affidavit being read by the Cle.k, stated, that Me Charles Pearson, the deponent, on coining to War wick, learned with seine surprise that 31r. Perch, a special juror in this cause, bad never received a sum arms at all to attend, with a view, as defendant be ii of pr,•judicing the defendant's cause. 3lr. Peac4Un immediately wrote to Mr. Prech, and went to his bassi., which wee lfi-miles from Norwich : and another deponent, named Simmons, delivered the let t••r. An answer was received from Mr. Perch, stating that be had received no 'salmons to attend as a spe cial-juror in this cause at the present assizes, and that in consequence he would not give his attendance. The deponent next applied to Mr. Lee, the Under Sheriff, at Warwick, who was unable to give him information as to the serviet• of the individual summonses, but re ferred him to the officer to %Low he directed his war rant, and whose duty it was to make out the sum monses. Nine o'clock in the evening was fixed upon betweeci Mr. Pearson and Mr. Lee, fur seeing this of ficer. but when the former attended at that h.mr, he was given to understand the officer was not then to be seen. The only assurance Mr. Pearson cuuld obtain from the Under Sheriff was, that a duplicate copy of the summon! should be served upon Mr. Perch, if it sboald turn out that iie had not bail one before ; and Mr. Lee called upon the deponent to admit this as good service,' if the messenger should nut be back time enough. •To this Mr. Pearson raised no objection, but lie wished to be assured that the new service of the • WWI omens would be real, and with that view accompa aid the messenger himself :o the house of Mr. Peed', wbieh they reached I) , Aween twelve and one o'clock in the meaning. The family had retired to bed ; but a se.-.ant having come out, Mr. licartutt wrote a note to Ple Peed:, and received his answer, in whiell he di,- taw-fly denied having been stituni:ned before; and he 6.. fart] this right I and , out of whom a proper jury could he formed. Of this nom her, poly four were forthconallog--of the rest, the law had dealt fairly with the is rt les ; it had done all it could to bring them here, - hat there was one, who was not asked to come at all. The neglect was then in the 31inister, whose duty it was to further the ad ministratise of justice ; but it was not the defendants', who ought nut to be prejudiced by it. In a case in Easter Term, I:119, tried in the Exehequer, that of the King r. Goodman, the piiSitioll was athrmed that a party had a right to able men to sere upon in person, in order that the defendant might suggest all objections which it ould occur to him, many of which might have arisen after the serrice of the somtnons— Illany after he had route into Court. 'I here should be a rule of Court for striking a new jury. There was also another objection as to the time Of the eay when the !mummies tsar served. II Senr at two in the morning, in or ler to be in Conti at nine, was a rigour unknown to the law. 'there should be always al lowed a reasonable time to the party to prepare him self. In the city of London, if a •:ithperan be *erred in the -moving, the person was not re quirt& to give his altendanre the saner liar in any vi the Courts at IYr-4min-ter Hall. 'I lot had been frequently ruled. been *truck oat ortheisanoel if they I. womb) he unable to attend, a‘ he was *en bed in London. The duplicate surunocu Then nerveds - 00n Mr. Prerh required Ilk attendinsce Ull the 29th July, the flr , t day of the Assixes. Mr. Serjeint V.tunuAN %aid he would, with the per mission of the Court, ex:iniine 31r. Under Sheriff Lee. Me. Lee being sworn, stated that he had made out his warrants on the 27th of July, directed to the eater for issuing the suottuutte, , , and dividing the jurors by hundreds. Of thy• services of the summonses he was unable to say any thine-• of his own knowledge. The wimp's then stated the substance of the conversation which Mr. Pearson had nith him. in the same manner as had been sworn to by Mr. Pearson I ' tell. Ile made out a new summons, which be caused to be served upon Mr. Perch; believed Mr. Pearson was with the messen ger, hut had nut seen him since the inan's return. lii answer to a question by Mr. Di N>I.IN. the wit ness re' ritieil that the warrants were certainly made out on t•.te 27th. Jos •ph Smith said fir was the inirsun who went to 31r. Perch's 1t0...v. with 3i r. Pearson. When they came the family were i:: bed ; but a lady, who lie believed to 3 1 to. Peed), put her head out of the witiolew. and wittwils said hr had a >tuutnune fIOM lilt' Sheriff, for Mr. Perch tuatfeioil a &poi...wt . ...try. The lady answer ed, that he hail already had SUIII.IIII/:131 . %, lila that he was so ill, it was quite for kin. to attend. This was said in the litilrug of 31e. Pearson. Indeed. 31r. Pearsonn said he k orw urn. b, for he had !wee speaking to the holly the same onorniti;:, me! ;hen ask ed to see her again. He said kr woulti call at sjit iu the morning. Witness saw 31r. Pranou t.. r e Wit!, fp chaise the mottling before. and he hail a ki kr, its he believed, from 3lajor Carto right. l'rosivexasisitted.— 31:-. Perch Lob! h r 1:n:loan.1 LTA gut stnnsuourea, hut she did nut IVAT in what rause. The mime of the liina• and Cartwright was never mention. ell. 31:. Petits,.,, only said he knew Mr. Pre.l. had gut fU ttttttt ne5.1.51. not Us. rum ttttt us. . butler said his toaster had a sttenolimis before, but hr war nnahle to intend. It was only for I believe, a special ;tory. here was no 0:11111 . of 3 rause met:tioned. I sal shin's: sure there mot a letter trnin 31ajor Cartwright. llv the 31ajur.—What reason hwe yon t. think I %trot.. to 31r. !Web ? nothing eau Le name opposite to the ;roil.. Then how nitwit stronsyr was tbe wavy herr, where the party summoned fired no less than 1.1 or 15 mils from town, was •ettell with the order in the noddle of the ni::ht, anti laboured at the Pune time under vrre ittilisps ition. in all these g runmk the Learned Couttorl ttait.l he umtld ell:Merge the array, hnt Ise would retiner the challenge to writing. Mr. Nerjeant nitAfs declined arguing in reply. The thief lisaus.-1 think the artatutra.ts used go to stretch a point of form to too rigour. !Mere is any thing io the 11/Ifrrill.i) 4, the delcnalmats will, of course, in nnatib..r I. Lire, hate the benefit of them. At prrsrnr nothing has hero cdren.l ta...11.Ar tie that w e ought not to g.. on With the trial but I mites: sa., the Ite.trated Counsel for the defendants have made as notch a. their point as possible. Let the chanctoce 1 , 1. plashed. Mr. !lira. said, he tad another ground of ..11ectio. , , tthi.h was die taatinditfereney cf the 3:aster tot the Cron n I iltb e. ClllEy ‘vox.-1 11;11 lit:A. you if you clooroe to ior ortorol with poor aroluoloolot• Mr. loorol, I deoire to I.e sivi'vred to argue this : I I ositecile it to he stot•tog ground, fur I can challenge a vocoolooon ,o!ury. I oder •itela circus.). stanreoo, I .101:iiit ri.e of shorri»; that asperi*l The (111 Fr BARON.—Majur Cal ttrri.rlot, I litAl( kni.,lW that it i% Ott* rr, , ,:11!1,11 tll 1111'.111 pill to :Isk the witness a question; ion lia‘e 1111 ab!e runnel; Anil 1 would rather %voila.] Irate your rawe in his bawds. I make all inrisihle mire tor r .iir feeliti,s in the situation iu which wan air but our regu!atiuns are fixed. mil. is not ...ii!ojec: to Ow •atile elgallettge, lies witil the oiser side. In I!ie ca trsvge of the r. 3lajur l'Artariglit said be teuuuld nut interfere any more. .1 witnes., named Smith, said he %aw the ettuituum which ttaa terved np.fit Mr. Peerh. It u f,r the 29th of July, and na• ved yesterday, the ;:t1 of .tugit%t. The letter% which her.% vett Mr:Peat-lon and Ale. Pceels, w ere then read. 'I he roxlmtatat e them has beets already %tared. Mr. Woolrr ilien tuonnted the table, and said he had to rrnew• his app..4l to thy (unit for arrt•uuunudw The ('our Blll.lN.—Sir. I have already told that I annul displace Councel (rout the table. . • 31r. Wooler (alter a rtlio:t inter‘Jl)-31:.. lAA hare to requeat that )uu will giie tilt some direction how I ant to art ? be Coifs: . N —Sir, 1 Late on:j to repeat hat I have :dread) said. 11r. Wookr.-31y Lord, I bet- you may give pe remptory ti-ders for my at'e••1111 tttt dation. The v U.tau•.—l mider Cult you persist in this way. 1 shall !rive peremptory urd, r- for Fount — you may have it behind the bar, in the box apprupi iated to the drf.•ndants. Mr. Wooler—Your I.firdillip secs their is pu con venience. ( this, like the former appeal, ended in Mr. Mauler's remaining in the same place.) After the letters were r. a.!, Mr. DENMAN claimed right of examining Mr. Pearson upon oath. As they were tied down to the words of the affidavit, it was but just Mr. Pearson shunt : have an oi.portunity of ex plaining parts of it. Tiu CEIEF can have nu diffietety in allowing you. Mr. Pearson being sworn, denied that lie ever ear . ried a letter ft Major I.:rtwright to Mr. Prreh, or that he knew of any such letter having been written. Ile had never said to Mr. Preeli, or the servant, that he knew of such a letter. Never saw Mr. Ptech before in his life. When witness said he knew of Mr. Pcech having received summonses before, he mew in other causes, DO this. Mr. Lee '.T.IS again called to know whether a seint rate summons bad been issued to Mr, Perch. for this cause, or if the cause was only mentioned amongst . ' others upon which he was to attend. The witness could recollect nothing but having directed the war rant to the proper officer. Joseph Stuffing was the person who received the Sheriff's warrant, but he had nut time to hate all the summonses served. Sent sonic of them by common carriers. lielieved there was only one stitrunuus fur all :he causes in which Mr. Perch was to serve. In this. the names of all wore mentioned. Mr. leech lives miles from Warwirk: the summonses were ant on Friday evening, but not sent off until three uselock in the afternoon of Monday. Cross-examined by Mr. HlLL—There was a ease of Lane r. Newdigate, in whirl' Mr. Perch was 11211/141 as a Special Juror. There was a separate summons sent to him in that case. CHIEF IlanoN.—l still not hear Mr. Hill upon the evidence. Mr. iii Lt. then made s. the strong observations upon the case which the erlderier adduced made fur the de fendants. Ile cushended that on the other side there was no rase at al'—no proofs—as to any service what ever. The Sheriff, of Bourse, did nut serve the sum mons. Salim; committed them to the rare of com mon carriers; but farther no one affected to trace them. Whale answer was that to the positive and allegathins in the affidavit ..1 Mr. Pentium, urtbe disavowal of Mr. Neel, It wan not denied were only fear specials in attendance. Tak i.ut Into requisition, and out of a great aarker sf names, the following answered : John Hughes, ( Thomas Balt, John Burman, Benjamin Hughes, John Worberry, James Laskin, Edw. Shuttieworth, I. Burman. When the basalt, was handed iv aka teres taa , to being sworn, Mr. Wooler, rising up, said, " Will you irk, me leave to ask Cott one questi o n Com:. BAtoN—lf you state your questio n 1 rill put it. Mr. Wooler—flas the fientleman ever given or e t . pressed any opinion upon the merits or deinerin ana l case ? Collar BARON—That, I think, he is not 04144 to answer. The Juror, of his own accord, disclaimed navi ni given any. 'I he same question was given to the other J am ,. but by command of the Court, they declined gi f i ei any answer. Mr. Hughes, a telesmee, was about to be seen : Mr. Wooler—Pray, Mr. Hughes r ill you indolp me in an answer to my question Cuter BiRON--Yes, I think as Mr. Iluj,rsi. s . i a Sperill .Ittr..r, he may answer. Mr. Wooler—flare you ever given anya ir i a j o „ rua the merits •.r demerits of this case : , Pel,ises Jnrer—l have not. By Mr. L»w•te—What profenion are you? It taus—The Ilentleman must mut answer* John Iturm?!), the next Juror, was asked the w it qns.gtion ; but he-itating to reply, Mr. Wool. r •;eic—l object to the Juryman n tt• _ count of hi' iticapaeity. Mr. LEI ARKS. TO the Juror—Harr you said, at sr tithe, w heater arse defendants were ur were n e t guilty. 31r. Woui.er—Sir, that was not toy question to ti e Umitlettimi Mr. C. A RKE-1 endeavoured to give the sabstsare of it. Mr. Woo!er—My e•urds were intelli6ble To ■n ordinary undergtanding they would hate cu vered wy meaniu;. Mr. CLAN klILSir, you forget to whom yoauldresr thi. Mr. Wooler—lf I hare sroken improperly I as open to the correction of the Learned Judge. Mr. CLARA My Lord shall decide. The Juror disclaimed haring giresanepialos. Mr. Lcutg—lto vim understand the ipiestios? l'l.lEr nAllfoi-31r. Lewis, you most be inure os your guard. I consider the übiertatiun unhandufte and itnproi.er. 31r. Woolees meaning was very u• Johnson, si chailenee nes made to the Special Jdry, relligaile, sin account of 'the itilinditr. rency of the Ma•ter of the Atter I:eing interrogated in the same way, the Crowe-ot!ire, and it was al: w.. 11. '1 hr s,.iiir doctrine tither Jurors were Weill, and the cense comairuced. w.. 5 lai'l down mire forcible in a tveritt case in the hlr. HALGVir opened the pleadings. The Wiliam liiiig's Bench. the King and %Visoler, where the charred the Defenaauts, George P.dmends,CliariesMseis. John curia right. Thomas Johnatban Woolf*, sad philters M. tier of the (*mien-other was declared to he A Jllltii eial. not a Ministerial I Itheer ; and it na. aYerlared ( tl lispo t s i ed lead perso w n i ai l• a a e l d ilk w b i e th i un il lt iCi fitT li I ta e : l l l" matt s sl i j el drt that he should he perfectly ;ninth rent bey% eel) the par- I siring and intending So raise and escite discoment ma lie ties. affection In the 'Made of the King's sobjects, and Mani .. i Mr. Woofer fur I,hc- .!' urged the same objection. I t tn on iTi ti v t c t • it t l i os isid a t 4 o h hatr i s o d w and est cottempto o fthe ud a ciot.nrowe Ile stated the rot:duet ..f the I:.rster of (hr Crown- I atut House of Parliemerit as by law ehed , established, and o a f s = olive as reprehensible, as he painted it to he in his mons House of Psrllament as by la* established own rase, which had beet' first riseuti nett. At first, I to It, on the loth day of July, 1919. and se Avenel* this I ilheer coutenaed himself with using a discres a d t l" s ; s i l i d aiii t s i Trin.. gis inTl i at i n i r b u e t r ir e zu p. Ac n i e o r t;sl7 " lir °la 111. i 4 tionary power of strib'ng tint what names he pleiseil, I , did combine, conspire, and confederate al* soh aIbIIAII lint when a list of strangers were presented to liiin, / a ith divers other disaffected and 111-disposed pram II men, whom lie did no know, he boldly a „,, ir ,i hi s i the purposes aboiementioned, and unlawhilltioanie cis ht to pack a Jury, and make one of his own rhoice, e h l r ee si t t , o a o n ts rl o a s pr i i nt io s 4 t o ie a r i .s o un a t o o d b to e Rozorese:o lai mdsa d,' es:: lie (M r. Wools) kindly protest".l arniost this gross Howse of Commons as a Mereber thereof, neither thet. ol violation of justice, whirli, under the passport of I said defender's. nor the said other conspirators, nor the is habitants of Rirniinghsm. being then lawfully authoriet i e fonts of law, wuntillerl all riffilt : but he believed It I seas his inability in urging this great Imiht• 3 " lied t i ii i° 3T i t a b ft e t v e 'tl e s i e rt. af t e%:ta r dil l i i i i t p s! i a n n t d s i p sirlc s i:s e tt ß he i r bre p::„ l n at,' ;lapse cause he had not entrusted it to a barrister, that more; metiers of the said conspiracy, assembled to the atimberst attention was not paid him by the l'uurt. It was ! tO• 000 • for the purpose of hearing dile" •cindal ^ c s - s ei ruled, that the laster tuight use his discrelon in se- t 4n s i s n:ni st i l u d g in t t h i ell ni u s l t rTn 3 M s e p n eee t an h i e l L th i e e ;lOu int se k" o s t . (7o a w d o w o ri e l"l s. st letting names, amongst whom were Co. lirand Jney treed forth.• purposes aforesaid. of the comity. who. :von such slight evidence. fiend The defendants. &e. so assembled. were 'barged with loa the Bill, and the great majority of n hum it ere either in; uttered speeches of the above description . . for ro tb io r r a t: persons in place, or others loot:log for it. They were, r t , , , ,,..1...,,, , rz n i t .„Yma a t. e . did An w d it t h ha a t I th „ e d " T h L i , my, otter. mil in fact, servants of tl:e Crown: and it it as but natural publish divers seditious. malicious. ineammetorymattersall the Crown should have re outer to them, wh et s it things. of end coueerning the (lowermost and Constitulie meant to assert, what might be considered its right. " i 4 il u ti t rra he i s l d as e l, law irsu trsr: dill aid 'aid wa i s t i n mus ter In lie asked, con id such men as the laranil .1 ory be lit to r„,,,hut one fi i r P ehari „ ‘ vehti . l „.. B id . t o be thee sil serve upon ti Special Jury, iu an issue between the there nominated and appointed the . Reptesestative sloth Court and the subject. said, and to claim admission into the House of Parliamsli• aid conspirators lull I lit Er Batt° N .—From the nature of your ar:,unier.ts, i n n s n a a Ale ni nibe n r ,r th i t a •r:o rti f , I ) . 11e .. ' 1;, e u r rr. f .T e s , 3. du. I know you cannot lie ignorant, that lam nut the Prr - The defendants lgi. pleaded Not Guilty. son to ai how y o u oug ht t o address them. I cannot Mr. derjeant ii•LOLIAN then rose to *address the_derf• - • make an alterathot in tin Jury. lam only a Nisi It was.,, a i'11'..• 14 " , hLikaid,..to of th e i to ro be ,,, n at a la r t ilith ae r ;;( P. lite Judge, and cannot alter what has been done in tthoeaie";ra: t h ese on — „„ asi e - g d .-- _ -- llebo er oldsr the Unit of King's Bench. which the present defendants lay, was that of a nano Mr. Wooler.—.lly Lord, you are Judge here, and conspiracy. and truly, if °Bowes were to be estimated f_. may controni— cording to Ilse degree of danger which they illlfifed... ll ",_ was a misdemeanor of the first elms. For what am 0 ' Cult r li.llit)N —My duty as Judge at Ni , i Prins is more limited and well defined. crimitial in subjects, than by words of Whim I. * cite diseuntent and disaffection in the yespie Ism & Ile Mr. Wooler.—l was using this as part of toy argi l . Govermineat ;to arraign the integrity ofan layer Il!t lsrr o emme arat<henoitarshature ; S t o ot 7.:7 4 l ) : f t t hat th i A e ll a l d le att i . . me si meat, to show the grounds al on which I challenge the • ... We are charged with a conspiracy against form of Its e poweettings by outw ar ard 'Wiener, sad by the liovernment ; I was preparing to show the con- I own autlo.ri:y • Althomili the whole indictment boul,I: I . this conspirary against us, surely %piracy of 001.cm:tient against us. If I est:lb:l%h special matter for consideration. yet the Learued Jadoe t is.‘_ _e oury Lordship still there were certain parts of It, to whieb b I ; .tii..fr ; ariiristar sttentlui. These he would arrange Irgr_, make an order— and hr was sure the) would be easily disposed of. IA en., l'n 'Er BAttox.—l have before said, I C3ll nuke no' criminal inquiry, it was eery desirable the Jury silisid order. a richt notion of the charges preferred, their astute mid cY t eu was • Thal &hoe' Mr. Wooler.—Your Lordship might weer safely say t a '. „ ll , g s 'h ft h d iP e o re tt i c h! pir li rd e" to p e t l f te " diseontent thisSW aid * that the circumstances were such you felt yourself wards the Government, and that they_ had Pr"ae d obliged to make an alteration in the Jury. sentstice for Birmingham un ndl lawy sad abash Cuter litirox.—lf I acre to do so I should be authority. That they had also instreetedtbls to force his way into the fir use of Commons, sod to wee impea: bed• his efforts to biing shwa a rhangetheee. Now. Is thooltI: Mr. Woofer said, his argument was nearly at an the objection was two-fold : Amt. lbedefeodsolemet IFNI end, though, after what fell trout the Court, h e s a w the it sanction of the Mac's writ. awdtbey Its, little hopes of success ; yet would he persevere, to a la n tio ar a ro f P or n e t ne end r"‘"mPli reach rernorolfrotrh:d7even pastes/ show that if he was persernted, it would not he in the dark. lie would sum up his arguments by saying, of our history. wiles the Khig of his owes males cat"; of all three. Without gods; bad to the very dark sem-. that after the Master of the Crown-office had struck "' Parliament it ' i t earl . : il l ." , bYti"C robe lellei" „, the (irand Jury out of the array;then there remained " ,: — ... --- „„,,,s,7 — ort; l Tatatire -i p eg o t w li rr. .Allival" .a ..... L "Tat but life names out of which to chose db. Ilia duty, ,in rusty data essild all persona Itirtil er to ., Pl ,..a gi geostl• therefore, could not be to select from a larger number ' "feu he is tile Pliaasml slay wale 4°l make ." soil a smaller one ; but hy leasing out a few statues, to . the Constitutive whiels the detearis•os.it i t a heir so lmer , w oo have ( he whole pantsri a &Aunt selection. He con; their e " asehswiltestiesi"d• Tae & Li y ou:40 0 eluded by entering I sew writs. that is. amid not give the • his protest against the proceeding, I a pines MIA bad it ant hefeee—lsidiseeVOY “"_.....1 *111F and reducing the challenge to the Jury in writing. I derisrPd boy All 01 Parli•o•st• " ewalemosig .l . ll4.l.4l.llrl ,l4 lll— oll. (fie .'ut re ' BARON ' , vet Puled the objection, and i 111. URI°. willia " Illad • tile Ad . 9111 • I treed it deriarel.lhan whitsi Ilaolmidabseldase a desired the trial to proceed. wee * low herd in the limns et Commona. 1 1 4 ,0 " The Jurors were then again relied, but still there Them*. way Ismer elthatrisber. west .1 • THE SI ATESMAN 4 i a A ist A — it .-- a "Ilk_ AM . . 1 trif srnalil have that Mr. Peteli hid hail siininionso, bin sot in lid not think he rase. fly lot the Ilrfenslants hail an tiniloahti-1 r then eery ill in i to a inry, nut only of 1: wen, lent of 24 good ions whirls was Lawful men, able and obliged by the law to serve, . . '.f ..I . nfenneor lure rould he funned. Of this I ilabilia... lIIIIim.. 'ion. I I -.___t_ • I