The Statesman. — London, England, 1823-01-21 00:00:00

THE STATgSMAN DIONDAT, JAN.4O. COLOAIIAX LOAN. TILE LORD CHANCELLOR said he wished to correct a tialstepresentation which bad gone abroad, with respect t, a tnotion made by Mr. Hart on a former day. It was on 11,e part of an individual, praying that mosey in the ,handy of certain other individuals might not be .sent 'abroad, to what was called the Colombian Loan; be. caFse Cie authority of Mr. Zi who had contracted that 40an, had been disavowed. His Lordship said he was represera.ml as hating heard the motion in his private troosts,aften the rising of the Court; the fact was, it was by mere accident it had been beard in his private room. -Ile was rpon the point of leaving the Court; when Mr. .Hart•:pressed.to make his metiers; spon Which he told the Learned Conned, that sinless he followed him into his roans ho - 000kt soot attend to him. His Lordship added, that apers hearing the motion, what he said was, ,that witlsoiettis stating, one way or the other, what mass thi nature et the Colombian Loan, he could not as a Judge, sitting in the King's Court, recognise it es a Asian to. a Government not recognised by the King 'of Alai, country ; bat that if any person applied to indivi duals in this country to lend money to persons abroad, aid those persiOnsisherwards diuvowtdile asthority of their agent, doused) was •a fair ground for hie toter. ',Tenet; asdtbat, if the•reeord was put in that way, be bould gcant tboisjusetion esprit,. *blame migbtbe the mature and Almelo. of thersehleb was termed the liolombiand.loommtneot. -His Lordship further odd, that.sitting stotirancellor, he ooeld neither authorise or deny the chsesoser of that Government • except on asthma? higeser .than his taws, He wished hist* .clearly understood, that it was by the merest accideld Rh/ whi4eArshaihearel inAkintrirate , evoin..se it.: the .it ( • • i .'• • •i▪ iiiminitinsitr,rn ireoentof the el mit' . ieviiittiir the arelithrtihnef ilia iaboirring under* cold, hat in itts reearti 'WM lefsliterishl as anaiooeh should be sint• deilZA pi lh lie . het thiLtio Conti *rts As(egg' Ai igo k .4, ; to be P re 11. •A?l'4 “• • - qbs .41 •*:• .• t .1 -Sll - :l•Ci l Ykt 0.400'8 BeNeiti • • - • von Ems 7. TVIPORIDOE. ` This was anisfelhankwel, tigniett the defendant 'foe publishing a hiaaplnforithi'llbefren the Christian teligion and the Holy SietiphieC seantiained it w - Worle called Palmer's Principle' offfsearC .The prosecution was eondoeted by the Somme* GENERAL Mr. RIMS, Mr. OURNRIN sad flir.titebe. DA Gt. The defendlterlippeerfttla person. • • The SoLtcrium (lemmas opened the use.' Tbe 'de fendant was a person employed ii • she'p Neil,' Water Lane, Fleet Stroml• the matte of Carlile *se • over the doer. The mode of et tying on Waives" Wal *biers No person actually served is tie shop, bet a listof books fiat:shored, ens lied ant a dial, en which:were-corres ponding numbers. Any 'person wishing to pundits* any of the works so numbered., put his mosey into a bor. and upon tooching•tbeelitil, the work same down a spout. To elide:vont to pus a step to tbfs public sal ience, three of of•lpoliee wereseut to Gild , shop. J'wo remained *stride. wkiltt tbe third west' in. He saw the defendant •tireee‘ and asked- kltVer Palmer's Principles of Nature. The defendant UN, 01, 111int't sell it; hilt yew esty gellishare 'firethiling to the dial. - Upon winch the bete, vimitite•;bartliii.. pat WV baW crowns into the boy, emllooeititrg Ike dial, the 'Maim wonted Came dovell•thil qefeett" lir la mitten dr Vtra; wa4 then he went awnii.lbeett wroth' leading •olrotas- Mitt cet opened. •Muidlefeadebt wen sppeibeeded earths' Seth of Aegean... 4 • • SmitNturesiiimut Duke; the °Sena. Were ealled to peeve tilepukireolio• of tbielieged libel; theposeages of-which, sot moon , the ercerri t iwire reed. ••• • • The eiptessei WWI to bavetbe whole of !be information- reed, botlr- . ts*V . , • Th Cuts* Jusciee said, thilltfeedant hid at" right to have his request compiled *Mot nor was tribe habit of tbe: Court !misfire theitehole of an information read. The Jury might lock et! the *bele record. If the de fendant chose he snigha bate the first count read, and the whole of the libeßeutpamages set out. " • The defendant was satisfied with this. and &C lint count was reed. • ."- The defendant thole aildretwell did /Cry. H. said Ybe author of the work, 'for wkkh be was prosecuted.' was one of the greatest philosophers of. the age in Which he lived; he had laboured itteesittititly to root out the growth 'of superstition, and sow the IVAN of philosophic wisdom end divine truth through the ire of *dente and 'nature. Jie would show that to support this doctrine if libel the law had been perverted by Judge, and Juries were in fltieuced under their persuasion to perjure themselves. There was ho standard of - Uniformity is theological opinions among men: as 'Well' might you restrain the tides or turbulence of the "Ocean, as well might you change or alter the seasons, as to stem public opinion and public discussion en these subjects:The Attorney and %Olin tor General only supported these prosecutions from Interested motives. The victims of Anticbristian per ircutions like these rejoiced only in proportion to the number of martyrs who distinguish themselves by bra in; raidsinent in support df these philosophic dec irtnes.• He meant to defend *very sentace of the work, ism/ to ,show that not one of these Vas at variance with the pritiiiples of the establialieelliwkof the land. If the Jdr) wire notiatisfieti that there with no direct evidence, ells bidet/ published this 66ek, he Mitt piteihild with a very long defence. ffe puflleto the )itry twesty *be 'tiler their own libradis were frdd from every book of this description. Heavtitild prnvd he was free from every thing that anti bear the colour of malice. He -Mid defend the . publication upon this ground--that 4"Palraer's Principles" was a book Ire* from every immoral inference or motive. He would show from • every sentence that it was . a book of the highest inoral-chareder; and that the Attor ney General, and not be, Wm the evil disposed perion who should have been set oat in this information. He called cm the Judy to look fur proofs that be was an evil disposed persos, and contended, that in the absence of such evidence, the verdict of guilty against him would nosonot to direct perjury. Some copies of this with had. been sold when it was published in America. -By what evidence could it be proved that this was a blaspbeinous: libel, other than by saying irwas expressly scrim.e against the Holy Scriptures? This was the point lot:their con sideration—what was a libel ?• Every book was a libel. We Could .not learn our A BC without reading a libel. The Attorney General bad 'published, by this. prosecu- ' tion; a libel against him, the defendant. He dared not s o % ti eratk a a th e c ould not prove, this book was a libel, ether than centaining 'the most unanswerable argu ments aiga:ost .a system of gross fraud and imposition —What had it to do what the law, that a defendant had published one book or critikiiii on smother? Criticism was a moral dutr. It would got do In these „times, to come ihto a court? of Lawi . and say the Bible was a book written or prodicid by the Almighty. The Book of Nature no man ever-heard of being ; who could libel the mineral or vegetable kingdom? Who could controvert ilia Divine wisdom which was -every where written in thilworti of aatareand science? Timis book (tile Bible) being written 2,000 years ago by primes of s.distsetcountry, in wriskir against it now could' not libel trd*, wisii we n . deed, either as to their " reputatioa or character, or Nene any , of their descendants:- If it was said rktrJeryladewistos epoo that• book/ it" 6141,1 not be saiathast it folloketi.they.kat won to•shc.:graek of it, or that defendant. in' denying the watts,•ther metre hotrod to convict him according to their oath:. t Lord Chief Jvastantra-Yeer bete ashen upon you to i tell ;h. Jury more thaw yoeoreauthorisrd. The Jury concurred with his Lordshipoliatin being sworn opon that book they admitted the truth. The defendant proceeded. If the Jury wete swots to pronounce this book a libel, be bad been prejodged before being heard. He should prove the truth of the Bible was no part of the law. There could be no such law as would compel men to admit the troth of any system of religion. No man could claim a property in religion, and therefore there could be no principle of. law recognising the protection.of that in which no map I had any property or right. `Vie Legislature had sanctioned the denial of the Godhead of the Trinity. The Act was expressly intitnled, " An Act to relieve those who denied or impunged the truth of the Holy Trinity." ',Oen Cater Justice—No such thing ; it is an Act passed slaty to reline from penalties incurred under a former Instate. The defendant persisted that these were the words of the preamble of the Act in question. Thns did the Legislature theineelves permit the impanting the troth of the doctrine of the Godhead of the Trietty, which the Attorney General told the Jury was part and parcel of the law of the land, and that it was a libel so to im pugn. He contended there could be no law but what was calculated to preserve moral justice and moral right between man and man. He dared the Attorney General to prove any thing immoral in that book, he defied Min to object to it on any other ground than because it did not preach up tithes or taxes,because it did not license oppres sion and violation of public law , and justice,. by supporting public robbery and poldic corruption. The Loa D Caw Jumble interrupted fie .defendant„ and said, li e must confine himsolf ,witbln tech *Rods silt would be proper fora Court of Justice .to beau.' Dyfendant-4, will conduct' My &relic* In bey ?pi idiaf, and not u l your Lordship &ay please tolletate me. Tbe defendiiiiProceeded—Widitcoelii the Jury con vict him of publishing ?—a book of criticism—that was not against law—containipg nososierable arguments — that was not against law. - Denyip'g the divinity of the Christian religion wen not against • air ;loom) Cater Justice-14s it is, I tell you so. The defendant proceeded and said, that to tell the Jury this book• was a libel, was just as much as to say this libel is a book. Would prosecuting this book put it down I—never ; would 'prevent people selling or purchasing ?...never ; it would occasion it to be more sought after; his publisher would reprint it tens•of thousands. ltjhad sold and 'would sell. MY respecta ble man • applying to g: tespe,ctablelloOkseller, might have this or any other book of the same kind without his being proseceted. The freedom bf the British Press was above the power of Princes. Force of arms would never stop'or subdue it. The more the Attorney General prosecuted the more these works would be disseminated and read. The freedom of the mind relating to public peace, moralsor prophecy, could never be pat down bylaw. It was against all pnoci pies of law,equity,er justice s toat. tempt to do eo; for knowledge and wisdom were frowned, and no Legislature, and no idw could usurp the privily of restraining them. Could the Jury find the defendadt guilty of maliciously sellingto a perms who maliciond ly bought, for the purpoje of subjecting - him to this creation ? He pronounced the Attorney-General a Osemoadklibeller, in anytegthat be (defendant) bad pets fished this b *ok r a the higied isptea sore of Almied*, nod. He defied Idol to prove th is. 'there was neemet petent reeds of trying this question between hiin sasl - the Attorney-General except by ordeal or by wager 'of ' battle. •He should read the inseli, page by page, and see. WOO. by sentence in order that. the Jury might ask their emischeaces Hit was a blasphemous libel. They wools; hot snletnit to the direction or the nodding of the Judge. It was well known that Judges could do morale liberty of the *subject, for to the nod of the..flolge Juries were known to give their verdicts, rather than by at tending to the evidence of philosophic truth. He then proceeded to read the book, beginning with thepre fare. The defendant having gone on with his reading unti about one o'clock. • The Seep Chins Jones observed, the only object o the defendant's reading this publication, this visibly for the purpose of defaming the Christian religion, which it was his Lordshii's duty to prevent. One of the. Jury rejoined, that as the evident object of the Attendant in reading the libel was to defame the Christian religion, their winds were suftleientlymade The defendant persisted in going on with the reading, contending it was the essential ground of his defence, and that 1t was impossible he could hue a fair trial if the Jary , tanned to hear him out. The LORD CRIMP JUSTICI said that unless the defendant refrained from the course of defence which he had adopted, after what had fallen from the Jury, his duty would be to order him to stand committed. The Jury, without hesitation, pronounced the defendant— ( )silty. The Loan Cuter Joyner ordered him immediately to be taken out of Court in custody. The defendant, in the hands of the Tlpstaff, exclaimed— " The Jury have not heard my defence ; I have not bad a fair trial ; the Jury bate been packed." CLARKE V. IIItaIIIIONT. This was an action against Mr. Barber Beaumont, Managing Director of the County Fire Office, for a libel on the plaintiff respecting his alleged connecConwith the Philanthropic Annuity Office. A full special Jury did not appear, and no tales being prayed, the ease went off for default of jurors. Another actiop by *PAW plaintiff went off in a similar way. • .• - • : - COURT OF COMMON PLEAS., • " TAMER 11. TIMQVAND. • Mr. Sergeant VAUGHAN stated that this was an action for a breach of contract. The plaintiff had been lt W eider, but by a decision of a case in the Court of Chan eery la his favour, he became entitled to a considerable property, which he thought it advisable to invest in the funds. The defendant was a stock broker, and had been employed by the plaintiff to transact his business. One of the clerks of the defendant had absconded from his service with a earn of 5,300!., and, to recover this, the present action was brought. Mr. Janie, Fenn, a clerk to the Bank, produced exa mined copies of sales and trausfers from the books of the Bak; the books were not permitted to be removed. Under the date of the 22d October, 1919, Sir. Tuber wag stated to have bought of Jucolo Clements, the sum of 3510/: commis. On the 2Stlt of February, 1821, he made a purchase in the Navy Five per Cents. of 5001. from the same person. On the 29th July, 1821, a similar purchase to the amount of 1000/. troth Martha Johnson. Messrs. Dower and Talbot made the transfer as her at torneys. On the 19th April, 3821, the plaintiff made a purchase of 1511. 16s. of Long Annuities, from Natha niel Thomson. On the same day the plaintiff sold out of the Four per Cents: the sum of 6004 to Sophia Shir ley, and 13u/. to David Gibson. On the 26th Febroary, I te22, the plaintiff sold 90!. bong Annuities, to Robert Barker; and on the 42t1rApril, Mt. the plaintiff sold out from the. Three per Cent. Reduced Annuities. the suns of 70651. to Thomas Greenwood, of the Stock Ex, change. A receipt was atropin into the witness's hand, dated 25th May,' l eft , porpertiag to be a receipt from the plaiotiff.of thshisto of 5!321; as atessideratiom for the transfer of 69UL •Vanabla. This mac a Pram, as .-.--. there was no entry lathe Bank, hooks of tbis transf er ; the last transaction of the plaintiff was 15th May, 1622, whisk was the transit, of 6/. merely. :le a (real num ber of the sales, theilefendant appeared as the person who identified the plaintiff as the owner of the stock sold; he had been so in five stiles of Con#ols, four of the Foar per Cents , and three in thw Reduced An !midge. R. Stuard oceasionallridentified if the defend• ant did out. Cross-examined.—On some of these occasions Staard's right to indentify was confirmed 'by a broker of the name of Bonner; it wu mot necessary that the broker of the seller should identify the person, for another broker's identification would be equally receivable. Re-examined.—There was an ester of I transfer of 65/. stork to the plaintiff by Lett, ho itlinifficatiolfeas necessary in that transfer. as it w donriky a hector. A paper was then put into the witneilee fiend, which he stated to be the receipt referring to the last transaction;' ! on the 26th of February, 1822, there was a sale by thel plaintiff of 90/. to R. Barker, and -on the same day ati-1 other transfer of 611. 16s. to the defendant; there was no identification of the last transaction. Mr. Jacob Clement identified the transfer of stock by himself to the plaintiff mentioned by the last "knees; be was paid by a draft of the defendant; did not }e member to ha* transacted the ballades with the tie , fendant personally. Mr. Talbot, of the firm of Dawes and Talbot, identi fied the transaction with their house; they settled.in aacount with the defendant. . Mr. M Joseph ?artridge Mr. David Gibson. and Mr. Robert Barker, Ideptifielother transactions. done" in the name of the defendant, but neither of these Gentlemen could swear to- having transacted the business with the defendant himself. It only appeared from-their check* and beaks that they bad paid money:Avid* Medic ma account of thesetransactioos. .. :4•., !: 4 . • Miss Ann Tusher. remembered her father haying hien introduced to the defendant about.five years since. by the recommentlation.of ;pother person. Soon aftetwartjt the defendant SSW tOsthe plaintiff in witness's presence,. "We could often change your stock if you were in•thil way." , The pisiariff answered he mild be is Weil if he knew of k the night before. - The defendant. " then Richard shell call and tell- you." My. Oft ' he'nteastiltsterd, whom he stated to bstrabacurhiaildelds for nearly - sine years. Stuard had acoordiagly sulked I times. nod the plaintiff had gene'..tw rbe . ftsdM the nest day inaonsequenee of these inessaresCchilb* fendant hadfresprently gone with the plaintiff , to kW Rank • the defendant, on a subsequent occasion, speaks ing o fStuard, said, he " could trust him• to do iii aby amount., andfor :tug aunt ;" and added, " I_ !Inhere I have trusted him with 20,0001." stock, had often beat changed by the plaintiff on the defendatsesseconnitenda tion. On all accasions the defenifeat ghterge4 commies 'ion as a broker. On one ,pce.aaion thaatiaiotiif.matr, chased 65/. threeptr cent. klonsol‘in coaaideralioe et' 501. ; this was,lll,..ltum US2I, a shprt.time after ie ltuar e d had absconded, and the defendant then aserti4 tal: ling the teceim iota_ the. plalitteirs,ipA -4 • Tatr may take t bat tputri,‘, l l,,ltunwl4 .'s gi& c I ; dU , ii shyse)47-.7 On the exeut 4 tispil2th Of 440;4. Jittrard broubt a paw l .parpoli ot -.to boi q revolve for the.6,143M. Chas gi ld quer 1311 Iss ~ . 41 loff l e fentliogs belong •isith a mem sage, In Iliti r attecalt44l4stf Ike Plaigeit:Mt Plitcha.s4 c af. . -Oa tbf-2fttl of, May, olp rt er aZtrA f ic , .11 1 % e t :11 A r a tilt .443 , ' air " 4 L 4 :4 49 ills.; as *Gin*. a rthe.1440.41T4M k 4t4ilklrmie chase 401:4 1 01 i.ha 3 per cant. f,..*Wei. -se ~- ~..I ' , : , 394 . Cross-examined...-The plaint ie . !had &now, Stag*, (aiaily for many years; his uncle had. firstrecommemil ellthe defendant to the plaintiffi , the ; obecryMistrs.ve Stuards steadinysa was not made withal slow &e emplas him; did not rotql i tect her father regretting ,),a huff employed Stvard ; hoe father never had emple.4ll4m I she had onee.carricd a letter to, Mr. Wargoilfiscaisid,' " Mr. Torquato(' bail been very . 1441 d 41 ,14i0411144 464 told him to bring as much basal** I* Jrs 1010,10- office. sad he would give him parlor allot 'tlie,co sion." •To this her father, who • was presto, 4 /A " this is the first 1 have heard of that;" the commie: sion was always deducted by the defendant; her father Bever knew that Simard received any part of the com mission. . 1 The plaintiff's case closed here. Mr. Srrjeant LENS, for the.defendant, said, the was a question as to which of two innocent parties should suffer for the fraudulent conduct of a third. He ad , twitted, that dm defendant had as late at July, 1820, ap peared as the person identifying the plaintiff on his sales of stocks, but it appeared, that after that time the plaintiff' was g Ily identified by Stuard. There was no proof that the defendant had received the commis sion of Alto transactions; for though Miss Taskes bad at first said be did, yet she afterwards explained the asser tion by saying, that the commission was deducted from the produce of the sales and purchase.. In fact, tbe money was received by Stuard, although as not being a broker himself, he was obliged to use defendant's name. .51r. William )ley; the uncle of Stuard, bad known the plaintiff's family many years; he remembered hav ing been asked by.the plaintiff to tall Stuard to call on him; the plaintiff then said lie wanted *nerd to do some business for him; witness had thanked the plain tiff for employing Stuard, and putting a trifle into his pocket; this might have been in 1819. Stuard lived in tioxton town, and sometimes visited the plaintiff, who resided'very near him ; Stuard was then about 22 years of age; had never seen the plaintiff pay Stuart! any money; did not know that the plaintiff took any means to follow Stuart! when he absconded, though he was ad vised to do so ,• when Stuard absconded, the plaintiff said he had taken away all his money. Cross-examined.—Had never recommended the .tie• (cadent "to the plaintiff as a very respectable broker ; Stuard had lived with the defendant nine yews, and Lad transacted his stock business for him. Mr. John Bodge, clerk to Mr. Furber, knew that Stuard bad done business for the plaintiff; bad never heard that from .any one but Stuard until after be ab. sconded ; hid heard the plaintiff's brother say sub's. quently to that event, that he had cautioned the plaintiff pot to trustSttustd ; to this Mks 'fasker replied, that they never expected Stuard would , serve them so, as they had known him from his infancy; two of the plaintiffs sons called in the afternoon of the same day on which this conversation took place, and spoke in very disparaging terms of Stoned, and expressed their wonder that the plaintiff hell employed him. Cruss-examined.—When. Mies Tasher was :here en the morning the himhe were 'referred to. did not heir the defendant say on that moroing, ssoolluding to •the transaction of tire 12th of April, that he was not there then, nor did lie hear Miss 'rasher say, " but, Sir, we inquired for you," nor did witness confirm any• such assertion. Re-examined.—He was acquainted with the defend ant's hooks from having assisted him in Waking them np; there was no entry of the receipt of commission by the defendant in those books. Mr. Serjeant VAlltillAN replied. Lerd Chief Justice DALLAS recapitulated the evi dence, and the Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages MOM This case occupied Iles Cohn until neatly half-put seven o'clock. 1: Exact;Ttpx.—Yesterday morning, George East, a lad about 17 years of age underwent the *whit sentroe• of the law at the top of Horaeutonger Lase Gaol for a ra p e on the person of a chil4'of the 'mute of Patter, in the parish of Nen ingtou. QIM BAILEY.: • d - 17te atientlott of thoc-e - 8 1 , the only Judge on the Bench, yesterday. wits, dlertrictei greater part of the day, 'occupied with Cases of pelf y, which were of uo pun. Ito interest.••• James Russell was indicted fee stealing 355. the property of .1. G, Lowman, a grocer in Mary-la-Honue, is whose service he was employed as principal shopkeeper. Mr. Lawman had on toe 29th December last left his business in charge of the prisoner, directing him to pay each evening the sum received during the day into the hands of a neigh bour ; that the first payment was short of the receipt by the slim In question was aware by an Infefior leeward of the. prosecutor, noosed Doncei. An attempt was made to Shake the credibility of Dancer, on account of his having once been tried at Beekleglitte for shooting at the coach of his Grace of Suckhighemy bath wood oar that the .at nr sUpposed shot was a political one, grad or said toile fire 4 during the " jollification," on account of Queen Caroline'4 acquittal, and that Dancer had been found Not Gutity. A letter was produced in the hand-writing of the prisoner; which contained a confession, and the evidence that the pro secutor had instigated the writing was not direct. A considerable number of witnesses gave the prisoner air excellent character. filseJnry, afterataving retired for some time, found him Guilty); but recommended him to mercy, which the Recorder Promised iu some degree to grant. J . .jitichardatue wee pat to Metier, charged with snatch ieg from the shopheard of Banks, perk butcher in Tottenham Court Head, a pig, worth 3s. The prisoner was caught in the fact, and was very much intoxicated atthe time. Mr. Law. on the pare of the prisoner, took an *Nee ties to the description of the property, it was called a pighnt, Infect, it was no mg—as it had neither feet nor entrails. He put it the Dent)); whether, if the cat talos of it she?O'ffigs iisitilated had seen the article in question, an indictment could ham lain for stealing a ettrep. Tile Rattoannivthooglst the pig a pig—at least in com mon language, The prisoner's master appeared, gave him a good eberaurr, and nisi he would employ him. He was accierttlitgly ftnimi Tidily. admonished to be more cir. aim4stet tie eojata Jatorc , fined a shilling, and 414. clebtpd. • Iret:auTa.—An inquest was held Tenth.- dip tedketiergery Room, at Middlesex Hospital.** *if ofe Middle aged woman, of the Dame of Ano thew. iteppeitirdinli,lira;o that the deceased lived a l i co 14, Waterlow.ftm: Brunswick square. On Wed nesday fortnight: hot 111 o'clock at night, a wittier,* IVi3 alarmed by ssreinis,trhich proceeded from deceas ed house, and on entering foetid her with her clothes. en ire. Wittiest, Wltli assistance., extinguished the lire, but not until abe was Most dreadfully burnt. • R.' Isaac fetritiikreeeetised in s tbe state described by the former witaesa; . Slsisprevieuely-stated to Mow that she was blowier the ire, when It caugbr her shawl, which COmmunleated tb lor elotbee—Vild.ct—Accideutat Near.. . • , toollipON MA It KIM. pato ek'itiknt eel *tan sun.; Al umisa : a. 1.. s. w; Wheat, red. (oId) :...8d 40 Beans. smell (new) ..23 2.4 .....-v-- white, (old) ..26 48 —..--- (01d)....28 30 .tH!? rod (pew) • ...• -11 2 4 ~ - .7—l ief. (stew) ....SW iS rtr..... 'One .. 38 SS- --....,---- (old) .• . 23 23 .......tv.... wuperfitio' .:. AO Id -- harrow (old) ..23 13 whAttp (near) ..I6 38 .. ''• • - (mew) ..23 dit 44;44.:R5C.,...:. . v',. .. 40 41 litrink 2l v 4. --.---- superfine . 44 48 •Oats, feed 16 15 Rye', Osts)'. v../v;•...: ... 84 -- tine la 26 Blitill. (old) ' ' Wt. = Poland llB 24 , .:..,:. (nisi) ;.A Y 3. ...pr..rt,... lb* . ... i . 4.: ...JO 28 'Pots** 9O 22 -----, - f , 1 , 1 1n8 3 •• • •Sq a$ ----- Ik blitit' 011 ..''' ... ...•:: , ~'.14 48 5t0tch...,.. 1 . ? e ".„,2418 1....i..:440 R....,„ ......... "66 36 • ' Pease, hog :.' : ..04 27 Flour, per-Ssek • 38 48 - !'"*.1"! Ire! • ,d 7 31 -- Seconds 36 33 4 .449 0 •*. - North Colonist SD Si 717.1.17 98 Pollard, fine, per qr 14 10 boilers (oew)...Sb SS Ryan • 910 •:' COlill MiCIMINV It, MARE Livia. Quantities and Prices of British Corp. &c. iKd 14441,11:. vered in this market, during the seek elided elits.Ag. Ott 11th of January : Qrs. 2 B. d. it. 4. Wheat - 8.799 for 10,639 1 8 Aterig• .. 4 0 Barley Oats 8,714 . 9,107 1 1 Rye -ri Beans - Pesie • • 90f . . 1,494 9 9 ft PRICE OF DREAD. The pries of the 41b. Loaf is stated at 74d. by the fall priced linkers. MEAT. ISMITUFIZLD, MUMMY, JAN. O. Prices returned by the Clerk of the Market. 1 , 311 ST.OP 8 POUNDS (ALIVE.) 8. d. s. d. a. d. s. d. Veal 4 0— S 0 Beef 3 oto 4 0 Pork ..........3 0— 4 0 Mutton --V —8 8 Lsotb U U— 0 0 CATTLE AT MARKET TIES DAY. 'Rugs, 2,064; Calves, 1 IU ; Sheep, .40,400 ; Pigs, 270. TEV/GATE MARKLT, MONDAY, JAN. 20. PER Si. OF 8 POUNDS (DEAD.) D. d. . . I. 4, s. d. s. d. Veal 3 Bto 5 U Beef ••.. 4to 3 2 Pork ..9 8 4 0 Mutton.. ..... .1 4 3 2 Lamb 'o 0— U 0 'HAY AND STRAW, "ea Loaso.--Jaw. O. Smormentaw--Hay, 00s. Od. to 80i. Od.—Straw, Otl. toads. Od.—Clover, flOs. Od. to Sss. Ok!. ST. Jaatav's.—Hay, 635. Od. to flOs. Od .—Straw, 48s. Od. to 435. Od.—Clover, 60s. Od. to Soa. Od. WHITECILIPISI..—Hey, 'sliced. to 60s. o.l.—Straw, 48s. Od • to 4tte Od.—Clover, 70s. Od. to 00s.tid. PRICE dr HOPS. rue Cwt. ix rue BOROUGH. POCZCTS. S. BLOC. Alt re.l4 Kent It 10 to 4 0 Kent Id 4 V Sussex 2 5 2 I 0 Sussex.o —2 JO Essex 2 10 —ll 10 Essex.. 0 0 Farnham, 51. Ifs. to et. 103. TALLOW, lie. reit CWT. Russia Candle, yellow. IL les. to 21, Os.—Ditto, Siberia. rs. to 01. s.—Ditto, Soap. IL 1 . 33. to 0/. oa.—Archangel, It. les. to 01. Os.—Town Tallow, 0/. Os. to 0/. Os.—Milted tuff, 0/. Os. to 01. Os.-Rough ditto, 01. os, to Of. OL E/raves Os. to Os.—Good Dregs, 01.6s.—Soap, London yel low, 31. 18s. to 0/. Os.—Do. mottled. 41. bs.—Do. curd, U. tgs,—Do. soft, 01. Os.—Stareh, Rifglish, 41. ISa. Pared or RAW FAT, perlllol,B of t4)bs.-4--Prite, by Tallow (u stated by the Tallow tifel tars), es; 3d. Halt-price, for Money.—MouldEendles, per doz. 101. Oil. —Store do. 9a. COAL MARKET. JAN. SO. Ships at Market. Ships sold. Price. fel Newcastle .. Afte Od. to 3.55. 3d. 2 liuuderland DIED. On Sunday night, at the Rectory House, in Piccadilly. Miss Antlrewes, the youngest daughter of the neap of tau lerbur y. On Sunday evening, et his residence in Davies-street, 13e1'1(40y-square, Mr. J. Gray, of the Colfml4l Office. Od Friday, the 10th inat at his house in the High-street, Margate, 'Mr. J. Rowe, in the77th year of his age. tendon : tdrtm, s Tted, End Publiehed, et th e Piece et " The etiititem No. 2437, 9trsted, by R. SVARDELL, LL.D.' V eoisenialcadeas, Orders; obe. an requested% be addressed. ff .? ! . 1 1 . t. b i .11 .11 ti P RI Al In WI pa op 01 Ilp ♦n doi IN tha 1 is