The Statesman. — London, England, 1818-04-17 00:00:00

r i t ' rIM - . 4 0 .y:.:. . •, . _ • . ort ..--...........- 7 -___, _ Mr. Justice Ilier.x . e. , --- m entirely; e same Opinion. and in addeinn l in what has beeV said * My 1 Lord, I would say, that this is a mode of proceeding by appeal (a singular Mode of preceedieg &fidgety) Which is tint' for the benefit of the Publli o Iset ii the ;Mute, or'suppcsid private tight of the 'parties. It ' Is • private suit, entirely under the cutitruel of/the; poesy ; and there tetty be reasons why it 'should to.' fir to be carefully 'stetted. It may take pia i WAr - en ecqUittal by the ordinary mode of trial, neeerly a trial by indictment; and when there has Wee iedietteut obtained, the elocution is entirely at Hoe opting of the party ; sad therefore it may be pet en futile by peeuniary 'commutation, which has fre. goootly been.the peke. That is no reason, ho w 'Pier, *fx& trial or the, kind shook) not take place. Jibs abrigelarity -taloa., soil being at singularity, we alltettdts'it with 'ith the' iheambrausts and ince st. ell‘leneitie to w *tittle low has subjected it ; and ono of these incouenieneles is,*: OW if the party lilted iseititetes the appeal than have tart opinion of OE cue anti of the guilt of the party, he shalfl be at liberty, art the 'option of the other partyil to bit ova life in beiard on the quel itee • The t a iftritekby bustle Is a tight on the pert of the Ap ' sateisin those instances in which by law he le•escleded ; and It Is supposed that a trial of pre• sumptions ft ewe' of these grounds. Now, I will only idyl, the* Opals filet through the whole detail of - facta lathered°. **a spoor Ibis counter-plea, they do not its.sityratalPeateettletelektut presumption which bristly' llilleremi ieletielhbeetteetkiews. As the cue has been' gelegpest, I have ithibleil , mot front time to time bave-occerred tie 'ant hi be very strong objections , egoista thellienueell which the cituuterplea has beew stated. One of time srhiretions is; as to the state. meet that While dionikstaeces " appeared and trete' uttaalfest tedlettra OWN& witnesses:' That is nota lawdele width goy tedtasught to be alleged. Ido seC enter keys the subject of the replication to tbe tweeter• pi* wherever the effect of that part of the record soy be. With respect to the widow, whether else itifeadast stall go without a day, that is a point width the Court does not think it proper now to de tide. It is a question upon which I have net come to may castigates in 'my own mitt& ' Indeed I might say, that it is for the consideration of the partiee, whether they would wish to have the opinion of the Court upon it. I can only say, that et present it seems to me that we are pet into that situation in which we are bound by law to give to the Defendant that which is the Defendant's right, ettless it is askew from him by Ibis cotroter•plea, namely, the right of trial by battle. 'Mr. Justice A1i110T.:64 am also of the same** mien, that the counter.plea in this case Is not lung' . atilt to oust the Defamdant of his right to the trial by battle. I consider the appeal in its origin as a challenge in itself, provided the party appealed thought fit to accept the challenge, unless in certain excepted cases. One is the case of the Appellant being a sweeten, in order that the exceptions might ' stet attend beyond obsolete necessity. But the cases in which women ass alloWed in be Appellants eve orgy few. Another is the case of an approvre: fin ' according to the old law, where an approver be anies an Appellant be shall not bug the privilege of battle; because ' by appea li ng, be acknowledge , big owls guilt, and thereby becentes ifable to the for totem's of ' his life at Common Law. Other. eseepted eases are where the party ii an infant, or above life age of gist, ; or, as some authors say, above Ore age of seventy. Theo if the appeal be in it self a challenge, provided the Defendant- chooses td accept It, unless in certain 'excepted case!, It' Is to be considered whether the Plaintiff has by Oh counter-plea brought himself within any of the exceptions. Certainly be has not brought himself Within any of the exceptions, in favour of age, sex, orconditinn ; bet it is contended that he has brought biMself within the exception, which arises out of the presumption of guilt. Now, referring to the most abcient writers upon this subject, and particularly to ! Bruton (who has been followed by all the settee taXent writers), the rule, as I collect it from that writer, Is, that the presomption of guilt which is to oist the Defendant of his trial by battle, is to be one, so strong and so violent, as not to admit of de 111 Si or contradiction—so strong and so violent, and so incapable of denial and contradiction, as that the Ahstices, if they should have thought fit, might award *motion without any trial at all, although they aright, if they thought fit, direct a trial by battle.— i I - don't think it is material to consider whether the instancisa put by Brecton are or are not of that violent and strong presumption which does not admit of denial or contradiction. if it were necessary to consider that point, I should ter' taint,/ 'say that they are net, but they were sn i considered at that time of day ; and it was upon the ground of their being so considered at that lime of thy, that they are mentioned as instances of the ex— ception itself, namely, that of violent presumption of guilt which admits of no denial. I Cannot find that the recta stated in this counter-plea (evetrif there was onir-insuificiency in form of Oleg/tien t er etecl admitting them to hi' will pleaded), afford a pre. seseption of that kind mentioned by _Braden, so strong and so violent as to admit of no contradiction. Being of that opinion as to the coutster-ples, I think the Plaintiff has not brought himself within that ex ception, and has not done enough to oust the DP.. fendant of that which is by law the ancient {acid until the Iry shall be altered or amended) and the lawful mode of trial in this proiteeding,. except in excepted cases. The consequence is, that the Court are bound ti award him a trial by battle, unless the Plaintiff be' l understood to decline accepting the challenge; in. which ease, it is net for as to say what will be the ultimate judgment of the Court, until ibe Plaintiff, shall take the sense of the Court ritereepon, which he, way he let in to do, and may therefete take time to consider what course be shall chase to adopt. Mr. Justice HOLROYD.•-.I am entirely of the saw, opinion with the rest of Ike Court with respect to, the law upon the caw, and that' the tenon-plea,' either nf itself or coupled with the replication. does act afford 'e ffi cient graved to seat the Defendant 01 the trial by battle. I thick-it denecusery, after the' discussion that has taken piece, for the Court to en quire farther into the law spin lb* subject. Upon the c..enter-ples this eppeers—that the Prisoner and Mary Aahferd bad been together during the coarse of the night, aid that several of the circumstances ' wait ta ato stated to Ws takoo ekes . Item *bid a *bat . _ ~. r -.. . , - . separated, bet:ease the conifer-plea of het gain to Mary Boner's ' • but it goat Ifry ti state also, that she returned stone. It sippeers; therefsre, that though they were together they bid separated; and there is no .negation that they ever met again. There is no rircettistance stated the coenter-plea Inconsistent with detect of the deceased having come to her death by itecldent—' either by her being ape* the brink• of the pit, and basing alipt in accidentally, or from dizziness, et rationed by loss of blood, having fellers in. Now that is . quite consistent with every thing stated in the counter-plea and the replication. I will not go out of these to any thing.that might' have appeared upon the trial ; but it is consistent with the ettenteonilea and the replication, that all the circumstances 'merit from which the suspicion arose against the Prisoner,* might have taken place before she went to Mary But., let's, and before they were aspirated. That theta.. was a separation, was proved in . evidence, and "all the several circumstances alleged against the Prisonei might h.velaken place before the separition. Why, then, if that were so, there was no motite or in-' decemeet to commit the murder. Besides this, there l another eitcomstance to . be taken into &maidens. lien, namely, the proof by various witneres of an alibi, from which presemptio* may be drawn in consistent with the supposed fact of his blind en the spot at the time, and that he was the person who' committed the murder; Witty murder was committed.' . Lard Eu.sascreotren added—The priersl law of the land is, that there shall be a trial by battle, in cases of appeal, unless the - party bring* himself within some of the exceptions. The only exception relied upon in this case is the exception with reference to the case in Bretton, which relates tea case so clear as to exclude all doubt, and would not admit of proof to the contrary, by means whereof the party never could deny the fact Ailed. The discession which lies taken place here, mad the consideration which his been given to the facts alleged, most con. elusively show, that this is not a case that can admit of no denial or proof to the contrary; and ender these circumstances, however obnoxious I am emir to the trial by battle, it ie the mode of trial which we, in our judicial character, ore hound to *ward. We are delivering the law es it is, and not as we wish it to be, and we must pronounce our judgment, that the battle shalt take - place, unless the party reserves for our consideration, whether under the-circumstances of the case, the Defendant is en , titled to go without a asi ; which is a point for fur. they consideration; and on the part of the Appellant, it shall be considered necessary to advise epon that point. At preitut we ptentvanat, that there he trial by battle, unless the Appellant show reaaon why the Defendant should not depart Without a day. Mr. GURNEY then craved time to consider of the propriety ott appl)ina for the judgment of the Court upon Buis wont It. asked emit Monday. Lord PAl.Ellll..woltalf,-6-841 it so; Let there he se entry of Curia advisart twit, entil Moseley nest. • . okomoo. Pli ICE OF STOCKS ?N$ DAY AT ONE 0 2 ,,CLOCK Mot 'Stork 5 per Ceot Navy RN. 3 per Cons Red.79M Dun& 9s NO p 3 per Cent Cosa..l.Boiel Stork Tr I Corbels for Ace. SOW Le* Aso. 1104 9.15 4 per Cent 974 i tier BiUs lY 22 P LONDON: PRIDAT. APRIL 17, 1818. The proceedings in the Howse of Commons last night were again extremely important and curious. The question of •an increase of income to the Royal Dukes nes again strongly breeght forward by Mi nisters, and warmly debated. Never wantiog in conning, though deficient in bonoster qualities, the ready instruments of profligate iatravagance appear ed to have resolved upon their usual tactics--to take the House before the Report ,of the Committee on the former night against the Doke of CLAKENCE'S marriage prevision was brought tap, and either get its vote rescinded, or procure a t►bte in approbation of all'their remaining propositions for the other Royal Dukes, in such a manner as might repair the di,. graceful defeat of the preceding erouiog. The Mem bers, however, were at their post, nearly 300 being again present, and no means were left for CASTLE. 11EAOSI, and hit friend, the sore-galled Lisbon Job ber, hot to take the only advantage they could, by , proceeding io favour of the other Royal Claimants rrttb thus Mod in forma pauper*, for marriage provisions ; as if the House, by reducing the grant to the Doke of CLAIM/Ica, was neves.' sitated to grant the demands for all the rest of the Princes. Lord CASTLERIAOII, however, 1r intimates' this Duke of CLAREWee'S decision fa ra t gird to the sous so reluctantly voted to him, and the obligations w.blch the acceptance of it would impose' upon him, namely, to tape the Lady too, the otheel part of dm bargain. This declaration, which Lord Carrseaaarsit read from a written eapreasion of the D.ke's mind, is a memorable picture of a Royal Duke's sentiments in regard to a point in which al most all men feel peculiarly bound by the nicest principles and appearances of bonoor, and for the broach which Courts of Law veldom refuse award heavy damages, and the voice of public sir. ^t se miter fails to lopply a proper stigma. Royal Iligh nesse', bermes', le sot feel like otter men. They ost, as their advocates my, a privileged dam ; and •boever drives bean's traffic with them must lay their account with disappoistmests.Thecommuoication wits, that as the propoeed bigness his income would not , ,; ,o intended, eitct, for which it wee pr. iyal Highness could not take , the Lady, thoegb the contract has been entered into, whit se small a pittance might thousand a year in ad dition to his twenty thousand five hundred, fleshy path, the falling timber, and all the well-let sheep walks areind it I I This confession of inability on the part of the amorous Duke was, of course, re ceived with teach lighter and cheering kennel{ parts of the house. It is the proof positive of what was 'impeded front the commencement of this 'idiom tieesection, savouring so stitch of the politics of Sehthfield, that his Royal Highness was not so leech in search of a delicate German wife as of a clumsy sour of Eat lhb money, and having now faded in his object, he hes no delicacy in disappointing the Meinfngen Princess in .her espectatioas. If the young Princess be not aware Of all the gallant gialities that attach to the husband promised her, this sudden determine. tioa of the disinterested Doke will remove bee noranceef his character, end as she, doubtless, knew the coodidoes of her espected happiness, it is to be hoped she will not break her heart et the disappelat• meat. This is " Love ale Mode," Reader, and the 'sample of Sir Arches philosophical mode of west kg the willow because he could cot get the mosey, may be practised as as antidote to despair by the Lady as well us the fortune-beating lover. This we know, that there are few in this country who will lament much for the failures( this association. The succession, we have no doubt, is just as safe as if twenty thousand pounds hattbeen given to secure it. After the mirth of the noose bed subsided, Lord CAsnteltAell fired off the other branches of the Fa mily upon the House. He moved a grant of 60001. a year for the Duke of Cameereas, who, whether he is better acquainted with his intended bride, or belies the aphorism of the Courier, that hearts have nothing to do with Royal Marriages, by seeking a. wife from some principle of affection towards her, is, certainly better enabled Is- maintain a consort, sad stands less in need of additional provision from the . British People for this purpose, for it appears Apt" by his ample revenues in Hanover es Viceroy, be is actually able to accuarelete his Parliamentary prevision in this country! Yet to him the ' House, which we thought was redeeming its character in attention to economy, was so munifi cent as to vote the additional 60001.- e.year, by a majority of 117 to 93. This greet was much de. timed, and opposed on many good grounds, which we need not recapiteiste here. We still kappa, that, in the progress Of the Bill, the sanuity will be confirmed to the Duke only in the case of his yetiring from his office in Wino's% for . theiecnee of that is ample. A dower for the Durkee: (Princess of Hassi)liicese she should'survive her hesbend, was mho voted es a matter of course. • This love speculation will there fore answer better, and probably be productive of many sock blessings. Nest Mkt the detectible 'abject of the claims of the Duke and Duchess of CtIWSFRLAND to an in. vest* of income, and their scheme of matrimonal fe. Utley, happily for the Public, who paid the funeral expeoces of the Duchess's still-born child, brought to perfection without the approbation so much relied Lefon. Never, we imagined, was the subject of 'princely merits of this kind better settled than by the decision of Parliament on the same question some years ego; yet the claims of these Illustrious Per sonages were again put forth last night, in a way that constituted not the least extraordinary part of this modest proceeding. The demand was first ventured upon the merits of the Duke, but these, whether they have increased or not, received so satisfactory illustration from the comments on either side. The proposal, however, was so unfavourably received, that Lord CASTLEUSAGH declared, " that he Would ,not press the question unless he could collect from the sense of the House more encouraging omens than, he owned, he now peiceived." Unfortunately for his Lordship and his Hoye Client, some remarks of a liberal Member were mistaken for more favour able omens than they proved to be, and tire Minis ter, I hus deceived as to the state of the field, by a rash charge, lost the action,, which be otherwise might not have been so foolish as to bring on. The decision was, 143_1°136 agi i kinst the pucuity of tee Dar. The nest jraigrful - trro#oritioe was for a dower to the Duchess of CumatatAnts. Lord CAs. TceeltAtallt who loses to hale two strings to his bow, doubly armed with his bane and antidote, had provided himself with a Resolution to this effect in case of a refusal of the snook, to the Doke. Tbe plea for the Duchess was more successful. The Howse' granted her a liberal provision in case of the demise of her present and third husband. The Princess en joys a provision from the King of Patna's, the father of, her first husband. We cannot see bow it is 4fitereditable for either her or this country, that should have such a maintenance, sot is it likely that she will relinquish her Prussian jointure from any. such idea. An attempt was made by 'Mr. HAm. DIMWIT to lay before the House some le. formation from correspondence given him foe this purpose, upon the conditions of the Princess of Setae's marriage contract with the Doke of Cum- SMILAPD, and her treatment at female bead-quer tem, but this was prevented on the never-failing pre. tease of delicacy, though it le obvious that in the where character is made so the greatest importance ", -_ ~ , . • IE l amostazzatmst i aii i iiitaitos e st e szc ZSMAll - Tr Wltiit Se - rammer, toiiht ifonjoillillololf of tir9ifO7Sloo carted trefore they separated. It appease:by the d on s u a gether lb. abash for ing toonter-plea, that Ift the course of that eight 1h wird. That is, bh Royal Hi i i ) separated, because the counter-plea stattiarthe fact the Lady, thoesh the c ontract I .L._ 'mime in Mary Boiler's but it toei hat to - wow etl4oool. pee woes to I emote of secb grants, obese be adequate to the eapeoliel4t. tbiopeiet et t it) he eaest at ewe detlyveVadi Jetsam& the treetios. ". 1 Is • ::: 4 • lierifitrie Papers, &Ilea, 'have arrived: bed another tonference fidget of the Cosamissi( with the Prussian LUC. The Chamber occupied with the articles of M. Fits's', for an PoHague d Administrative, birds) , before the Correctional After bearing the King's were postponed for a Madame MANSOS, OD With the disorder of Fu. of the Paris Papers, but ascertained. A curious dispute Switzerland, between etecetnr of the illestri has teaselled all the wi mortal remains of the , bet the latter refuses to that Keictouto wished The European Casella Privy Coineil of The Dotch and , BLOOMFIELD is the Qovernoiont to soli °Urfa of lisosi for Column Dot,. Wi •ederstsnd ti day nest, for the Sir Roar*? Wit.stio cn livantrtt, Mr mere, and severe' PiT liament. Yesterday the the Duke and Duchess Her MAJESTY Address of the H Yesterday the with their usual r EIISASITR and the Queen's Palace, Corporstion of I. Princess and Prince. trious couple after*. slate rooms, *here' dresses of ihe t 4, IMPORTANT DEO L AN D.--The King, v. the Corporation Bench, tbii 114) , ' important case, at issue, requiring tl In the Pro,ocutor Catholic. We co tieciitiots.-.4 Dahill xt5....-ltheso . .. .. . •-, .... " . ,=======a•be i /ers, with Mills from .Flanders and ived.—The Duke of WELLINGTON. erence on Saturday with the Pre. ..., • omission of Liquidation, and also i l ' Minister and the Doke at: Rice*. .‘ ill r a i rt n k a les ok of te t i he n b ß i e i d c e o t. es T pos he de tr ae le o l . N iber of Deputies continued t o b e I A inittrigive, ere. commenced on Ss. ;: 4l° Correctional Tribensi at Paris.-... . . 1 King's Advocate the proCerdinp for a week. The. examinatiee •1- li !, ou the trial of the persons cbarge4 lli at Ft, A Long, Occupies is great pars . • * • vt era, but the troth is not yet easily le pule occupies public attention is • Teen Prince JAIII.OIIOWieT and the N lest Flows Koactosco. The forms" IS he way from Poland to convey ti l e ' the hero back to his native sod,' si mes trt give op the body, •dechtring. b risbed to t , be Warted in Switserlsiid.' - r wilt hes bees 'oppressed by,, Berne. • • 4.- we I Flanders Papers state that Sir lk o l le person 'sleeted by the Britig ) allele the hand of the Prioress Ae.. Or his Royal Highness the Dukeel l . v is 111 •ti e I the Southwark Meeting, en Mau. i g : purpose of promoting the interpose 4 son, will be attended by Sir Fate.' SI e it. Lawwres, the Hon. thin had' al other independent Members et; ' . 1 r Prince of iirssz-Homstmo visit* a 'chess of COMBESILAND. re held a private Court to remise Ow i louse of Commons. ,it I I ' sh er iff s of London and Midtileseio illtindants, waited opon the Priecessil the . Prince of lizass.liossauttop ce, to know when the A !dress of 414 London should be presented. TIM I 'we appointed Saturday. The illet.4 1 lerwards proceeded to one of thei re they received in due form the M. 1 o Houses of Parliament. )aCtslole TO Tile CXTSSOT.TeS OP Fellot • It, at the prosecution of John Cole, on of Dublin.—The Court of King's (13th inst.), gave judgment in this roil directed that a Mandamus should the Corporation to admit and swear. ✓ as a 'jember, although a Roman cnnuratolate the country Upton this , tin Keening Post.) P odious vermin make their way from Vesuninater Hall into the adjoining tephen'a Chapel, wbere they are so toe rottenness of its fabric *Worths, ttitt it is foond itlipOssible Se *alit. !-.....m....-- TIIE MAjgRITY tin vet!; LARGO. QIIIIIIT ?A VIM ROYAL Cif Wldi DUCA Of CLARIINCE. I. Forties, 117. Oink., Arthur Vatoe.J• Psiithi•ro , Ed. P Fellowes, W. R. Portman, F.. 11.. , , relativity. Nit.. Piuokett , Rt. Ft. .. : t • FerrAlOksu, Sir R. C. W. , Fitzgerald, Lord W. Pierte, H. Folkotone, Lord Philips, George Frankton& Robs. Pelham, Hon. C. le rre ,,, a ,a,.. W. Pi g gott, Sir A. •Gookell, Ben. Puraninhy.Hois F C. Gamey, H. Nolen. H.W.V... Glib.-ri. V. Giddy Pruby, HOD. Copt.. , Gorily ne, J. Phillinture, Dr. . 1 • Grant. J. P . P.m, F. i Gtoefell, Up RObiablia, G. A. 4 Gone. Sir W. Rashleigh, Wm. - Gordon, S.r W. D. Hobart', W. T. • OrMtien.ltt. How. 11. Rocky, Sir W. , Is H o mmersley. H. Russell. R. G. Holdoworsh, A. H. Sitstoo, Sir C. • - 1 ' Horse, Wm. Simeon, Sir Joke .",.. '. Hamilton, Lord A. Shaw , Str J. .. '. Ileathcote, Sir C. Shoo', lira. V. Hawed, Hon. W. Startifortla, Jobs Homily, Ed. Simon, H. A Jionit Rob. Start H. .r Hill, Lord A. Seorgoij. Sir J. :. Jolife, 11. ' Spencer, L.,.4 R. 4 G. Keck, 6. A. L. S. adamore, Itohi. Knatchhall. 5 . y.5. Sharpe, K. t • Itiw Sir J. D, . .efton, Earl of ~ Lt.4-ktert... J.,!... s '. Snotish. John . • Lender, W. ~ I ;;',. SiWitlo, G. Latoucti,.l. • •Smith, sass Lninlnna, Jolt* 0: Smith, A. - -.. of Lrievre C. S. Smith', W. , Lenl•ap:liir WO. Smith, R. LeOl-. 'T. F. Stn ) th, J. H. , Lloyd, J. M. Symonds, T. P. Lyite.ou, Hon. W. Stanley, Vim. F. H. Thornton, S. Lester. B. L. To o mpsou. T. , J ' Lubbock, Sir J. Taylor. M. A. ... 1. Lot , . ndes, Wm, Tremayne. I. if. .. Maitland, iti. F. Talbot, R. W. ydd i., Chariest Tawirrnell t . Motes/P .. -' tYlorrylot, Joe. Tierney,, Hoo.tm. 1412",,i,it• WM. listugbini, Sir R. Yr : Milichunt, lit C. Vise, It. W.ll. 4 bi•5r....., J. Is. S. Vernoh, G. G. V: a Macdonald, J. Wodebouse. F.. • ai m urk,. IA .A. Wittier, Gen. , Mathis... 4, Adusgrld We i err W. I. Mart n, J. . Wright. J. Atkin* E. blobsco. P. C. Walpole. ll.so. U. • Mot peth,V is. Wal.legtaire, Hue, Moore. Peter W. r. 'Mania, S. Witte, J. A. ,S. New porA, Sir Jetta W e rid,,,Edward . . North, U. Wh..rtoa J. , , o Nait. Lord Willskto.'Walw • !Voices*. R. W. ifilylps„ . lll( 11. 1 1 1 /, • 4 Ord, nano W you, c. W. • Oloalalan, Lord Williams, Owes . Ogle.ll. M. Wood, Alderame TalLeit••-0. R. flieseer. PAjltk,D OFF. '. D.l Moiciatosh, Sir J. l Plainer, Waal, oni.•••,-.-"s wee, Assam 17.—wheal trade doll et adr At" al to (Serene .•I Sc. on Monday's prima.* Wass, nod other articles so nterattow. iHESSLD MARKST. ATaii. 11. tarok the Offal. per some of Sb.. Id. to 4s. sd. I Heaa at Cattle this dal' IL ro. es. Od. Seem d. id 6.. ed. Sheet, end Lambs . 1 I hi to is dd. Calvet. S. be Ila. W. Pie • II A Y -MARKS?. . . 41. Ot. Ott. no 0. Ss ed. I r hi. lk 61 to It. M. ea, 1 ~.....111 2 .:. ....i l I , .S aiti ,l 41 " - • - • - --- onn.d and PatOwb.42 *.. . -- iT;T ------" I1L. Orrice, Ito. I, 11a11dtactejtj# 15° t . • ..- i ... • tho Courts of WI building of St. Stl numprous, from thews protection, pate them. . . Tll ?mat TottO aGAItisT *dam gss Abercromby, Hit. J. F , A ticreronihy, R. Aithorp, V iteauat Aubrey. Sir J. Abdy, Sir W. Arland, Sir T. D. Atkins, Aliiertnisa . A rehdall, Geo. Amen. We. Ayburyt, W. Blair, J. Hunter Baker, Join, Rolland, John Broad hum,. John Barclay. C. • Bankes. N. Sankey . , George Bastard. Joao • Robingtun, Thomas Sancta on tv, Jos. Stkrell, W. ' Sentinels, Lord W. tl..tighe‘, Sir J. F. Broderick, Hon. W. liaillie,.3ammi K. Baring, SIT Thus. Horsiest, James Harbin', Lord Beniwi, Mil. H. G. Birch, Joy. Wand, Hon. T. Btditiebeint. H. Barrougin, Sir W. fiyate, (iro. Cooper, B. S. Carat upt.m. Earl of Cock , re.l, SIT Calerafi. J. Carrtaufne, 3. F. Calvert, Nor. Campbell, Hon. J. Carew, R. S. Clotter . .1.)611 " • • HootCochrane; 'CuraenO. Corks. Hon. J. Cocks. James S. I).ivenpi;tt, Davies Drake, T. Ilruke, W. T. Dru.n:moild, 6.0.. Ilunde.yeell, J. E. Dunlop, Gen. Dirkiusoe, W ID. Derscanison l Vise. Douglas, 11“ o. F. Dinkins, W. "'xenon, W. C. Ellison, R. Elliot, Roo. W. Finlay, r. Morrell, Hem. P• Colts ascnamos, clips of 4r.—Barley I la Oats, Peak ileums Siert"' 1 Ts Sett ... S. ad bunt 11. Veal... S Id. Pnrk Rs. Oft Loeb ...7s. 6S. Ray .. al. Clover All 21. Vb. tc ,3 L t 4 iiON : Pront•4l ani •I'littlp.tb:42.lo.. thATIUNAM Orrielly 44 501104110 . 4. nillik 4. i . - THE STATESMAN. " r+ -