The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-11-07 00:00:00

Pir X ~... r j 4 7 • i I I. 1 , 1 t ti 4 f 1.• I t . T!-;S STATESMAN. sepectine• polarre was not conclusive of her Mk 6%4'. guilt.• Barham Krants's evidenCe was en irely tlestro”.4 by that of Vaasali. There was a soilF, irient reasoir‘for the Countess of (Hill not heing called...in the patine', in which the Solicitor-General had c0...a-examined Lady Charlotte Lindsay. Lord I:otifrOßD said, that if he were called npon to &vide Rpm+ thenidence, heshonl•l hate been under tl:e painful netwasity ofsayincgniltv. But he should not give his vote fur a measure so inexpedient as that before tl.e root.e. He •trasted lie was as little to be in-1 thfiiiated by popular clamour as any one of their' Lord,hips. They conld not pursue a more effectual ! cnu--e for allaying the irritation which was now! r :Wing over the country, than the rejection of the hil:. He was at a loss to conceive how any man could vote for the Rill without the divorce.--(Hear, hear.)—, And he was still more at a loss to conceive how they 1'6%641 support the Bill with it.--(A langli.)—He had now discharged his duty by stating the grounds upon which he pre his vette, • i The Finite of ATHOL newt 'rose with a heavier' heart titan apon this : Occasion. Itelad attended with enerh attenil - ian to all the evidence, abd to all the argu tuen's that Lad been aildnced vilthinthese walls. lie cot -Mere(' her Majesty's guilt to he proved upon her own evidence. The House now stood in the situation whether thee ,Mould go to the second reailing pit the er not. Ile conceived that no person ever had a friers. trial or more advantages in the Course of it than deer Majesty; and upon the whole of the case be ronid lay his hand upon his heart and as au honest wan give Lis vote fer the second reading of the Bill. Upon the Noble Lord's sitting down, eonsidt table eamour took platce for the precedency, when it was ulti mately yielded to The Duke Of SOMERSET, who spoke from the fir thee end of the Galley. which, from its immense dis tance from the Bar, orevented our hearing the ',revive len. gnage of his speech, lint we can conch for the authen ticity of our ay.:mint of its substance. His Grace op. posed the Bill in every view he took of it. Upon prin. tildes he consideteil it anomalous to our constitutional law; and with respect to the evidence in support of the charge of Adaltery, he considered it very nnsatisfactore. lie viewed tie testimony of discarded servants with merit dictrust; and that distrnst was much increased lien lie observed the means by which their evidence sits Ithtaillell. It was stilt more hicreaseil, when lie found that a Ibreign Government hail lent itself to the get•inz up this kind of evideure.— (Hear, hear, Lear !) Hit this was not all. Nut only had Foreign fi„ eero menis ac t e d for the pnrpose of getting up e,.kienee against the Queen: but they h. d been en in endeavouring to keep hack evidence which wits to he ad.luceil in her favour. Wee a ma ter:al witness for the erusecution hail been sent nit of the country In viol:ain't of an express pledge to the cur trary; and•tlie tonthiet of other pet-volts who were not ender their Lord.hips cognizance, appeared to have been highly dislionoarahle. He alluded to the rorduct of Barun 4tmptetia. He felt upon the clesei of the case a in neh more favourable opinion of the I 4,/u.yn than he I:.til at tiro. great part of the evi.; tierce against her hail been completely disproved ; and to e treatments of those alto thought her guilty eras prin cipally founded upon the absence of evidence which might have been brought in her favour. lie thought there I was enough to leave se.pieion on the mind, but by no mans sufficient to warrant a conviction of guilt; and even in such a case as the latter, lie conceived it would rot justify a Bill of Mains awl Penalties. lie thought catch allowance ebonld lie wade for the Queen on the score of toreign manners, and the change of those manner; in different countries. The Noble Duke pro ceeded to illustrate his remarks by observations on the inners of the different countries through which her Majesty hail passed, in which countries the behaviour to servants was less reserved, and the intercourse between the sexes not so confined as it was in this country. Her sentinel was certainly , extrt.trdivary, but he could not say it was guilty; and , referring to the strong disapprobation which had been shewn by the most respectable part of the coin rnuaity against the. Bill, he expressed a hope that their Lordships decision would prove to be in unison with public opinion ; but for himself, upon principle, he was determined to resist the Bill. On the Noble Duke sitting down, the clamor coa ti:met! for iereral minors, when Lord BRENVI LLB ruse. lie said that in the first instance he entertained a hope that at the close of a long and laborious life which he had spent in conjunc tion with his Noble Friend near him (Earl (trey) it would toot be a dereliction of hie duty, if at the end of thirty-three years Parliamentary duty he hail continued in his retirement : a retirement which he had chosen for the ease of the few remaining days which it might please Providence to spare to him. Even if he had been as anxious engage in, as he was desirous to withdraw from this proceeding, there was another cir cumstance which wouhiJeati to the deterrips hint from any interference in the present arteiliisii.'" It !tut' circumstance: of isle &evict:been engaged some, years since in an taltuiry teniching the cossduct of the illus trious accused. But their Lordships had thought proper to order the attendance of. every Member of their House, and in obedience to that order he attended in bis place; and ha was then induced to trouble heir Lordships with his sentiments, as be had observed that. several Noble Lords Dot in the hallit of addressing them, bad thought it neces sary to state the ground of their decision. If, there fore; he had given a silent vote, it might be erroneous ly coaceived that he was unwilling to state the reasons ppon which he had decided it. He had always been ansions to press upon their Lordships the adoption of that policy which, in his opinion, was favourable to the Interests of the country; but in the present ease, he considered the question upon which be had to decide as merely judicial, and in the opistiou therefore which he should pronounce, he declared he had no desire to shake the ibripion el-others. He was merely about to account for his own. The question now for consideration was, he conceived. not so much whether the Bill should pass, or whether it should proceed to a second read ing. The whole was a mixed question of justice and legislation. Of justice, because no man could vote for the continuance of the proceedings without a per fect conviction on his mind that guilt bad. boon dis tinctly proved. He admitted it might be ergot with perfect consistency that the Preamble of the Bill was established, and yet that considerations of public policy might interfere to prevent the passing of the BBL • • iOn the first question he hall Caren moat elisions f pos sible to pronounce ti tairourable decision. He bad en deavoured to bring his mind to a conclusion favourable to the accused, to a 4.144 that it was tamer of suspicion only, and if he multi Imre brotight hianeind to that con clusion he. should have vote.' a:re:Mit :the further conti nuance of the proceeding. lint lee was romp-Neil to say, that the fact, the substance of the preamble in the Bill, t he adulterer'', intercourse, hail in his opinion been completely proved. The public attention had been direetedi them last few years to souse rases of murder, of a most aggravated nature, and in almost everresse, the coin ictiun of the criminals had taken plan., entirely as circumstantial evidence, to the satisfaction °revere mind. Now that a man should be found with a knife in his pocket, answering the sire of a wound indicted on the murdered man, is in itself a alight circumstance and might occur, without attri hating the slightest guilt. If to that they added the absence of that persore at a suspicions hour of the night, from his house, still it would not he sufficient; hut if it appeared that that liner eorrespondled: with the precise pe. nod of the nsunler,and add to that th at the person had been trare•l almost nearly to the place, c•here the 'atrocious deed had been committed, then, indlee-I, it would re quite ;eery little adilitioni.l proof to bring conviction home to every mini!. So in the present instance, it had been proved, that the individual in qiirstion with out. any particular merit, as it appeared, hail, in a few months. been der:deal to the table of the Princess, had enjoyed her oak.- confidence ; and lead enjoved al most exclusively her society. These facts are all in themselves seispiciona, but if they stood alone, they would not be sufficient. They might be considered snspid•ioce, and even improper, but they wdosehl by no ine::ns lead to a complete conviction of roil It is fairly posidsle that these ciretinistanc,s might have occurred ; that they might have beliered all the•:e fouiliarities took place, unaccompanied by opportunity being sought fur the ennimission of crime• ; hut when they came to learn that they slept in t b•• same tent for five week. together; that that tent cadmic.' from its iliterior a:1 others, and that those who fitted access to that tent immediately withdrew themselves ; am! when they came to couple with all tle•se cirrinstances, that there was mot the slightest shadow of excuse of any necessity being shown, then indeed, he should say, that it was hard to doubt. If the e war any doubt, or any presumption of doubt, then indeed it should go to the benefit of the accused. It might perhaps, he slid not know how it could, hut suppose it might happen that the parties could be ennsi der•d to sleep war each other,without any criminality. lint then, they should enquire, if this was a person to whom the Lady hail never 'hewn any attention, if a person of n higher nature, to whom she never paid any particular attention, they might he glad to seize tin that feet. and give it to the benefit of the accnsed. But aho was tier person in this instance ? So that if all these consideration are not considered sufficient grounds for presnorption of guilt, the House should be prepared! to say that in no case could a criminal inter course be proved except by lar dleinenistratitoo.--(1 tear) An•l this could not he done iu 99 cases out of lOU. He had now stated all that was necesary on that part of the case. Ile begged to assure the Rouse, that he felt extreaie retie( that ha wasoot called on te state auure.—,i He now raffle to the question of expediency. At theenuhel mencement of that preseeedieig, the House-had thwack fit to appoint a Committee, and the result of that Como mittee was, that ate investigation should take place. To that inve•iiigalion he thaue•!it it his duty to attend mi nutely. That investigation bad now been ;Mlle through. and fee dill not know what course could he pursued whereby an opinion of guilt could he prommuced but by voting for that 11111. The question then appeared to him, was, whether now that the case erns heard, they shunhi leave it undecided ? If the majority of the House were of opinion that the Queen was innocent, would it not be the height of injustice to deprive her Majesty of the benefit of that opinion ? The effect of the mea sure was this. hlany may vote against this Bill who are convinced of the guilt of the Queen, but no man can possibly vole for the Bill, who has nut fixed his opinion on judicial gmands. He would ask them what motive could they have to enter into this inquiry without proceeding to pronounce their final jui.genent on the case?—(Hear, beat !) With respect to the votes of their Loniships, no doubt many might consistently vote against the 11111, and yet hare a conviction of the guilt of the Queen—they might do so, because they might dislike the course of proceeding; hut, on the other hand, no man could vote for the Bill who hail not only a moral huts judicial persuasion of her guilt.—(Hear, hear!) More they arrived at the question whether the Bill shouhl pass, there were two things to be decided, which could only be considered and decided in the com mittee. The first was as to the extent of the !Jilt of the Quern, a ilitestiord to Le derided by the majority of the Court. By that opinion would they determine whether the .preamble should he allowed to remain in its present form, or ss /tether they would adopt another lonic more consistent with the declared opinions of the majority of that House. If so, the party accused wonhi certainly be entitled to the benefit of that cliff . The second question was one which could only be emosidered after their Lordships had derided on the first; the second quotation was, What would be the notimes s anal whet, the proportion of punishment which ought to lie awarded, if the guilt of the partys hould hello:clam d by the opinions of the majority of the House ? On that sufeject an intima: tion had been thrown out, he thought soinewhat km. gularlu, respecting the omission of that clause in the Bill, which emanated to a dissolution of the marriage vows ; he kept his mind open to consider that as well as every other part of the momentous subject before them be did so slow, to the last moment ; but at present his opinion was, that if the House took as certain the guilt of the Queen, that part of the Bill which went to enact the Dissolntion of the marriage ought certainly to stand —(Hear, hear!)—He would, keep his mind open to a reconsideration of the subject, and should he hnd it ne cessary, lie should not be ashamed to alter his opinion. Tier point was certainly one of the greatest importaase, it involved great consideratiows—it was a great ques tion of policy, deserving the most mature consideration. Mach hail been said on the present situation of the colo ny, and the temper and feelings of the people; bat not withstanding the power mad the close/woof many of his Noble Friends, they still left on his mind the 11011Vidiallis that the sodden promulgation of the opinion of and House, that the Bill should be no further proceeded op, would produee more Of public irritation.of mischief,. a id of evil, than by their proceeding to a second rafting se the 11111. Lord ROSSLYN went through a great potties of , the evidence, commenting as be proceeded, and seta• tending that the whole ease against the Queen was overthrows. It sons parts mart ael coemedieted, was he not boned to look at the suspicions eireem stenee of gamelli and Rigenti's elate b brit i ad' suborn the witnesses ? And had they MA the lads ' faction of keening that many of the charges were even given up by their authors ? . He had, nevettlimi less, observed, that even those Noble. Lords who bad given up Majocch?, permit, Sacohi f and others, bad endeavoured to obtain for them something like the favour or consideration of their Lordships. With what intentions of justice, or with what g o od and honest motives this had been done, he was at a loss to discover. The situation of her Majesty on board the pularre was not a situation which would have been chosen for the commission ofadultery. At the most it was entitled to some degree of suspicion arising from the previous elevation of 8ee...1 genii. Why had the Noble Lords opposite suffered the charges to sleep for three years? Where hail been their feelings for the honour and dignity of the Crown and of ' the nation? He would now say a word or two npon the expediency or inexpediency of the measure. In the first place, it had not been thotrglit expedient when the scan dal was fresh ; it had not been thought expedient during 1 the three years in which the Princess resided in Italy; it was only thought expedient when bile COMP to fish' country. Mane Noble Lords thought of modifications of the Bill, and that it con!d be made proportionate to the shades of guilt, when it came before the Committee. say, - said the Noble Lori, •• if the pre amble of the Bill be not made out to the very extent and letter, no honest man can give it his vote. One single art 61 proved adultery, even taking it to be proved, would plot warrant the passing of a bill which e l ear , et t a l o og course of adulterous intercourse and scan:lalous conduct." He would next look at the conduct of the prosecutors. Ile would ask if the Milan Com mission had helm dispatched fir ail honest purpose, and for the -Livery of truth, were they not bound to collect what evidence they could in favour of the l'rin ceps as welt as against her? Ile should have liked to have seen the inside of the oreen Bag, for the purpose of discovering how notch exculpatory proof it rontain ed. He was ready to vote against the bill, not only because he thought guilt not proved, but because he deemed it , wholly inexpedietit. Much had been said of the pre sunaption of guilt agaiest the Queen. But was there: so presumption in favour of the Queen? Was her corns! ling over into this country in the manner she did, no presumption of innocence ? Was it no presumption of innocence, that, aware of her conduct being watched, she discharged all the four servaws who Face evidence against her within a mouth, although they must hare beets in posic:ssion of the knowledge of any facts ' which in reality had occurred ? If it should be thel intention of their Lordships to psi the Bill with out the Divorce Clause, he foresaw the t dread ful consequences. lie foresaw the degradation of • the King ; for after all the Penalties of the Bill had been inflirted upon the Queen, she would still remain as a person whom the King i most own for his wife. Every practice of the consti ration, every practice of our laws, every precept of di rine religion was against the divorce. Anil they cook! not p3FI the Ili without it, because it would then be I - said of the Queen in regard to the King, "Gad es he 'nay he, she is stilt ;fowl tyntrgh for Iti.,i." I t had been I urged by the sulporters of the Bill that this was a pro secution at thell,t.thee of the state. Even taking it in that point of riew the st•rte had no right to seek this *rowdy. The state hail permitted the Queen to live abroad from the society of her husband, sad hail, with the full knowledge of all that Jaw] b.-en sworn at the Bar, offered her a bribe of ralt,ooo/. a year, to continue her absence, with full pee lmission to follow that course of life of which the state now mule a complaitit.—(Lond cheers.)--If she were tried on impeachment by the Commons, she would he at liberty, as is the practice in all cases of impeachment, to otter circumstances in mitigation of punishment, and these were circumstances of mitigation. Were their Lordships prepared to go into a fresh examination of mitigator; cireuinstances? They were not ; and yet they were asked to pass this Hill in all its severity. As fur tl:e Divorce Clause, the rejection of which was pro posed as an expedient, he considered the rejection not wily an absurdity, but an additional punishment on the ilneen.--{Cheers.)—De felt iinwilling to proceed fur ther, but when he heard the Noble Lords coin heating ! bh Addresses presented to her Majesty, and on the i answers to those Addresses; when hehesird them speak of the mischief which might follow from the interfer ence of persons in the cause of her Majesty who were hot considered well affected to time Government, he was forced to ask those Noble Lords whether they bad considered time consequeoces of passing the Ilill.--brad they considered the consequences of degratlintilse Queen, whilst they fixed her ism the country? he greet body of the people being favourable to her cause, Neling fir her misfortunes, might be rendered despe rate by the severity of her treatment—desperate, too, against the higher classes of society. He hoped their Lordships would have the wisdom and the virtue to avoid so calamitous an issue. If they should degrade e Queen by their judgment, they would make her the rallying point to the disaffected—they would ex pose the country to danger--the Throne to degradation —they would risk the characterof that House, in times when it was so necessary that it should stand high in the opinion of the people. The consequence of passing the Hill would be the universal indignation of the respet table end enlightened part of the community, and Would afford a rallying point to those who had been so d eloquently described as the disaffected. The Nimble Rarl then sat down, and the cries of "Question, ques don," became tumultuous, and strangers were about to be ordered to withdraw, when Lord HOLLAND said, that as every Peer would Nava to stand up in his place, and say Content, or Not Con tent, the exclusion of strangers would be nanecessary. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that notwithstanding the argument of the Noble Lord, the House must rain-1 mutely divide, and therefore it would be proper to en-1 kw, the standing order. Strangers were then ordered to withamw,and a division took place on time question upon the second readingef the NI of Pains and Penalties, when there appeared Contents - - -• s • ---- - • 123 Non Contents Majority in favour of a second reading . Adjourned until toforrow Akt 10. • Farther extract frog the Norfolk Pipers received nu Saturday : 48 LARD n 4311 Till PATRIOTS. frail Captain WATKINS who arrived from 5, th at • short time before he sailed. a lbieiN Igim'Oef Naked there frasa Manta Martha, briergiag lederieselos that the Patriot forces were en heriag that ease, end tint c ar ding= and k a a ana yb o *ere both dearly laramnd by sad l a M. Harctiana was eertaiely is poemeheie aad thole mese rarklir plain rotted: a doubt was ester -1 Weed of their ahloate sins's. - , - .1.,.... ' . .." „ . LIST OF T I NE LORDS, Le THEY VOTED ON TOR SECOND READING OF THE EILI. FOR DEGRADING AND DIVORCING nit lILIEVIT. Pntl TIII BILL. Lontte—Prodhoe, Harris. Ross (Gln4coe). (Abo : , 0 0, Hill , Contbm mere. llopetoun. Gambier. Mg t Imre. Niles (Cassilis). Latittertiale, Sheffield, itedesdei, Ht. lleien. , Northwick. flulten. Sapling, Carrington, D, stauwille. Hon., Saltersford (courtono). Stewart a ()Wits (Gallows)), Stuart (Moray). Douglas (Morton). Grenville, Suffield, Montagu Gordok (Gently). Somers, Rodney 'Middleton, Napier. Colville, Gray. Selwyn. Forbes. , litynoey—Cork. Llaadeff, Peterborough. Gloucester. Ch.,. ter, Ell, St. Aseph, Rt. David's, Worcester, London. Vi %Cot NTs—Exmoutli, Lake, Sidirouth, !Jell illy, Car lon. 11% tine), Falmouth. 11 ereford. Et It L 4 —l.irliCriek. 11054. Dononahmore. Betmo re , Lonowd, Mount Castle!, Kingston. bit. Clertnnimi. Bryn:. low, Whitworth, Verularn, Cutout:art. Mulgrave. Orford, Nlanvers, Nelson. Powis, Liverpool, Dighy, Edgocumbe, Striatum (Athol), AborgavennF. A)ltshar%, Rathoro. (*Wham, 11m-court. Wiru irk. Portsmouth, on. ham (Ilontruse), Pomfret. Nlscele.field, Aylriford.Coventn, Rochford, Abingdon, Shaftecbury, Cardiaan, Ralearre,;, Winciiibektritavisford, Bridgeu 110111 P, Iluntingdos. NI A en t: it•isas—Con) nghaci,,Thoniond. Ileadfort. Angles/ I . Northampton, Camden. Esvter, Cornwallis, Burlingham, Lothian. Queevabeer. Vi inchester. Kys—Wellington, Northumbeland, \elm& tk, Ru• fang, Revotort. Lord Privy Seal. Lord Presillent. Archbishop Tuaos. Linnet r, A rchit:•..rip Canterb.,ry. His Royal Illuhaess Duke of Crummy, Ills Royal Hig nen Duke of York. AGAINST TIM rILL. LORDS—Breadalbane. Erskine, Arden, F.lhenhnrough. Al anley, !Atlas (Ely), Fitzgibbon,(Cis re), Caithuep r , Disn e y (Dower), Yarborough, Hondas, Seises. hlendqi (Clifdeii,. Auciland, Gage, Fivherwick (I)one_Tal), Anthem, Kenyon. Sherborne, Berwick, Ashburton. Begot, ‘Calsinghaw. Dynevor, F 01...-. Hawke, Mandridge (Argyle), Durk. link hind, Grantham, King, Clifton( Darnley). Howard of Ming ham, Save and Bele, Deere, Zouche. Clinton, Audley. Da Clifford, Belhaven. Viirot srs—Grantil . P. Anson. Duncan, flood, Leiaster (Duke of), Torrington, Bolingbroke: EARL4—Blessingtor,Caledon, Enniskillen. Famine!, Gus ford, Carrick, Morley. Miuto, lierewood, Elroy, Homey. Rosslyn, Ca matron, Ntanatleld,Torteccue. Grosvenor, ille , borough (I)ownshire), I)elawar, Ilebo.t.:r, Darbourns, Etremont,Sam, Stanhope, Cowper. Listr:mouta;Oe. ford, Nomberry, Jersey, Albemarle , Plymouth, Essex, Theriot, Denbigh, Suffolk, Pembroke, Derby. MARCIE sssesllattl, Stafford. Leastlown: Ds ER.—Portland, Brandon (Hamilton), DetonsUr.., Bed. ford, Draftoe, Richmond, Somerset. A relibihilup of York. His R ))al Highness the Duke of Gloucester. The sceontl title affixed to several of the Peers is that by wltich they are generafly known. O• THE MkJOIIIT Ot , WITENTT-RIGHT. Two Prince,. of the Blood, molding high orners, ream:n oble at pleasure Nine Cabinet avowed orosecutors in this !stet's, ersittion • . Mid Persons holding olltecs In the State am! Celle, de pendent upon tLe Ministers, prosccutt.rs, and IrgMUT' able at will . . . 13 . . . And three Purrs, uho hat ing att.mded the prosecution. Mere absent during the whole. or most of the defence, vie. the Duke of Neueastle, Earl of Hone, Earl of Sheffield 3 . . . . The Archhielop of Canterbury , who prOulzed the case, by erasing her Majt st) 's name from the Liturgy . 1 tits tpon examining the division in the Lords yettenlay ne find that, excluding the nine Ministers who are the au thors of the Bill and the proseentoss of the Queen, that of the hereditary Nobles who derive the right of voting from their birth, there was a majority against the m tion ; fur among the majority of yesterday we find eleven Bishops, seven Representative Peers for Ireland, and five for Scotland, all of whom are eleetire—every one of whom too owes his election to the Minister oldie day. We never, indeed, remember an instance in which a Representative Peer fur either Scotland or Ireland was elected rt hose politics were adverse to those of the ex hting administration, and we know how the Bishoprics are disposed. Deducting them from the majority of yes terday, the Elective Peers with the Ministers, and about sixteen Placemen, who are remorable at the King's plea sure, combined with the chosen Members of the Secret Dantmittee who originally recommended the Bill, bow stands the majority ? DAY AT ONE O'CLOCK. India Stock 291 222 Dlttollonds 265. pun. Old Ana/titles Ex. Bills 2.1. 4. h. per. Ditto COO. °MUNN 91 dl3. Con. for Accolint eSi 41 68 L.tt. Tickets 211. ktte. PRICE OF STOCKS Till: Bank Stock Yl3l 213 I per Cent. Real. 671167 • p.r Ct. con.. 084 Gi 3 tis al per Cent. 761 70 I i per Ceuta. pr Ct. Nate 101;1 Lang Ann. 41 7.16 leap. 3 pert:aut. Ann. Che *tattaman. " DulTisa IFTATISNAN" ss INcol IiTATIGIMAX." ... . WITII " 1101 - LONDON: TVESDIT arexixo, NOVEMBER 7. STJTESMAN OFFICE, Twa o'Clerit, This morning, her Ilis.tas iv went down to the House of Lords, and presented, by Lord Paella,: Pro test against the decision of yesterday, and a declaratina of her innocence retail% e to the crime with which she had been charged. The House, after some warm debate on the admission of the Protest, weal into I Committee on the Bill, and were proceeding to db. coss its clauses when our paper was put to psis . . --- "" -- 7 - - STOCK-RAC:MINOR, One o'aiet. The Fonds, contrary to general expect itios, late risen this mooning, upon the ‘econd reading if the Bill before this Lords. Consols opened at 681 &Ohs Account, at which then were buyeis Albert dire; bat have since boss dose at MS. The \ ' Gls rite inky be attributed to a rquit preraleaf-t . flogalliirs that the hill would not be read a third ' * ' cos 'Procne* of time cooperatively small. - . 16111 witich it was carried y ester d ay ; they sa" has been tltrow4ttpon k s . altiamstely passing, Erlikh* was sited upon by several speculators. Tho'suliet Is tin steady, a' sat 60 fur the Account. IN • : 4 . - a - 7 - i..• I