The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-02-07 00:00:00

LAW INTELLMENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, Fan. 5. The LORD CH a :mum, on taking his seat, observed, that no Report having. yet been received fruit, the Mas ter's Olhre in the matter of Dean, he was therefore tinder the necessity of ordering. the ease to stand over till Tues day next. COLES V. (LUPIN. This application to the Court arose out of the well; known transactions of Kinnear, Wolfe, Levy, &r., and the hills which Halpin, of the firm of ('oles and tialpin, iu lieet-street, had accepted on that firm, with t the privity :mil consent of his partners. The Court, on a tor met occasion, having heard the statement of 3lesiors. Coles, sen. and jun., granted an injunction against Hal pin, to prevent bins from receiving or paying any ac counts, bills, promissory notes, or rash, in the name and ore behalf of the said firm. The hills which, however, had been accepted got into circnlation, and were held hr several persons who considered them valid. An ap plication was made to his Honoar, the lice-Chancellor, who, on bearing all the circumstances, ordered an issue to try the validity of the hills. In that issue Messrs. Coles were defendants, and Mr. Dixon, the holder of several bills, was ordered to he plaintiff. The defence set up was, first, that the bills were of an nsurions na ture ; and, secondly, that the plaintiff, when he received them, had, or ought to have had, knowledge of the manner in which such bills were drawn, and that they had not received the sanction of Messrs. Coles, nor hail even been known to them. Evidence on both these points was produced to the satisfaction of the Jury, who, tinder the direction of the Lord Chief Justice, found for the defendant. It was also singular, that since that verdict no application had been made for a new trial, and therefore the validity of the bills was nullified. at least so far as Dixon was concerned. 4t Mr. Wingfield Isehl several others; and it was desirable that the case should, as soon as possible, be sent to a Jury, to ascer tain whether they were valid or not. (In the part of this Gentleman several affidavits were read, stating, that MB value had been given, and no more than five per r• nt. taken on the goods delivered for Le Bruhn, the etch merchant, who was stated to have come to this •onntrr to purchase Foods. To this it was answered, bat if . strong swearing could invalidate truth, then it uou'd have succeeded in the rase of Dixon, whereas •he con rary was the fact ; but how was it possible the parties could believe the bills to be valid at the time they received them, when it was known that this pre tended Dutch merchant was no other than a wretched individual, living in a miserable garret in Houndstlitch. On each of these points Counsel dwelt with considerable length. The LORD CHANCELLOR, after observing the circum stances which had taken place on the trial, and after some remarks on the baneful consequences resulting to partnerships when any individual took upon himself to accept bills without time privity of the firm, stated, that 'he circumstance of no application being made during the interval since the trial to have a new trial, operated -tronglv as a proof of the nullity of' these bills, so far as involved Diann; but then it did not follow that a Jury would give the same verdict in the case of Wing field as they bad in that of Dixon. He therefore or dered an imam to be tried forthwith io the King's Bench, to try the validity of the hills, and Wingfield to be plaintiff, as the issue was to assume that they were va lid.—Motion granted. No other case of interest came on. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JAY. 5. MR. HUNT AND THE LANCASHIRE MAGISTRATES. At the rising of the Cori, at half-past four o'clock, Mr. Hunt took his station in the centre of the floor, and manifested an inclination to address the Court. The Cozy Jvrrica.—Mr. Hunt, what do you want? Mr. Herm—My Lord, I have a motion to make to the Conn. The Cuter .frsTrce.—What is the nature of it ? Mr. Hour.-1 will shortly state it. I move for a rule to chew cause why a writ of certiorari shonld not issue out of this Court, to move my trial (the King against Hunt ■nd others, for a conspiracy to overthrow the tiovern ment, at the Manchester Meeting, o■ the 16th of Au gust last,) out of the jurisdiction of the county of Lan caster, and into that of the neighbouring county, that of York, or else within the immediate jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, in Middlesex or Westminster. I :stake this motion on the ground that I shall nut have a fair trial in Lancashire, where the calm now rests, anti— The Untie Jerrice.—Are there other parties in the cause, and do they all concur in this motion ? Mr. tivsr.--1 du not know ; there are others with tor in the indictment. _ Mr. Justice BATLIT.—We cannot help that, but we must know before we can consider your 'notion; all the parties who are indicted must come into Court, and con cur in the application. That is the rule. Mr. HUNT.-1 know some of them do concur in the motion I now make, and the rest may for any thing I know. But bow can I ascertain their consent so as to bring them into Court, as your Lordship says I must? Many of them I only saw when I was thrown into gaol among them. 1 am accused of a conspiracy with men whom I never, to my knowledge, saw until I was made a prisoner at Manchester. flow am I to bring them into Court under such circumstances? lam ready to show that the trial ought, fur the ends of justice, to be removed out of Lancas hire, and I trust that under such circumstances the Court will grant me the role. The OM, Jcsvcr.—We must know whether the parties do concur in your motion. That knowledge •mwst..wm to as in the regular way. Unless we hare i•, we cannot receive your application. Mr. HUNT.—My Lord, bow am 1 to procure that knowledge? Tie CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice BATLEY them Loth •al I. the Court could not grant the rule. The ledges ruse from their seats, and retired from the Bench. TIM KING V. MI. INUIT, PARKINS AND °TRW. Mr. Danms - w rose to call the attention of the Court to the case of the King against Mr. Sheriff Parkins and others: his object was to press upon the attention of Ibis Court, the necessity of fixing a day to bring this easpe to issue. As it stood now on the paper, with the quantity of business which was fixed before it, there was little probability, perhaps, of its coming on dnrin the the sittings. It was, therefore, most desirable for the interests of all the parties, and considering also the great public importance which attached to the snh ject, that some day should be fixed with as little delay as possible for ()ringing' the matter to issue. The Iw arned Counsel said, be saw one of the parties interested In this cause now in Court. )fr. Hun? (the !arty alluded to) rose from his seat, dwi said that he was most anxious the trial should route on as early as possible. He had so expressed himself when the parties chose into Court on theist day. The pr stponement then.took place without his concurrence, as he had detiared his immediate readiness to go to trial at the time. He was now ready for trial; and he could not 1-e'p urging upon the Court the great hardship to which be was put by the delay; he had thus to at tend with his witnesses front day to day, at consider able inconvenieoce, and to bear postponements caused by others, and with which he had nothing to do. Indeed, Mr. Denman hal himself refused to fix a day on a for- THE ST. user occasion. For his own part, he hoped the Court would accede to the Learned Centlernan's present appli cation, and fix as early a day as possible fur the trial. Mr. JUSTICE BATLET.--.-HOW does it stand on the pe remptory paper? Mr. thrsatsx.—lt is eery low down, and so situated as not likely to come on within the present sittings of the Court. The Cum, JUSTICE, after conferring with the other Judges, said, that as an arrangement for tieing a day bad not been acceded to when it was formerly men tioned in Court. they (the Court) could not now inter pose, and place it in a different situation in the paper. This case could not be accelerated except at the ex pense of others, which must then be obliged to yield to it. The Court must be always sorry fur the inconve niences to which parties are unavoidably exposed by repeated attendances in their business ; but to give the relief now applied for, to these particular bodies, would be to cast a burden upon others. The cause must now take its coarse as it stood upon the paper. (This is the information against Mr. Alderman Waithman, Mr. She riff Parkins, Mr. Hunt, and off ers, for the alleged inter rnption of the business of electing the present Lord Mayor, at the Common Hall, some time ago) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, FIB. 5. BUTT P. CONANT. Mr. Serjeant V•ean A . te said, this case came before the I Court on a special verdict. It was an action of trespass and false imprisonment, brought by the plaintiff agahlst Sir Nathaniel Conant, for having issued a warrant, by which the plaintiff was arrested, aool subsequently committed for want of bail. The warrant had been issued on account of the publication of two libels, one on Lord El lenborongh, the late Chief Justice of the (Mort of King's Bench, and the other on Lord Castlereagh.— The questions raised on the special verdict were, first, whether ant person way be arrested and held to bail for a libel, before indictment ?—and, secondly, whether a Magistrate, its his individual rapacity, can issue a war rant for that purpose ? The questions were of great im portance, inasmuch as they were not merely legal but constitutional, sad as they involved that which hail al- ways been highly esteemed, and watchfully guarded by Englishmen—the liberty of the press, and 'the persemil freedom of the subject. For himself, he was one of 1 those who would give great powers to Justices of the Peace • but then, in making that admission, lw wished I to ad, they were not there to legislate, hut to expound what had liven enacted. As this was a rase in which the defendant contended for the affirmative, the oases of ' proof lay upon him; and unless be could shew some positive rule of last, or some clear decision or authority , in his favour, hr (Mr. Serjeant Vaughan) insisted that his claim of jurisdiction must fail, and the plaintiff must recover. And he would add, in the words of a great lawyer, that if the authority was to be found in the books, it was law, but if not, it should not be admitted. The statute 1 Edw. 111. c. 16, enacted, " For the better keeping and maintenance of the peace, the King will, That in every comity, good men and lawful, which be no maintaimrs of evil, or 'narrators in the country, shall be assigned to keep the peace." After this statute their Contonission was settled by all the Judges and Herons in Michaelmas Term, 1390, by which they were to invite into all felonies, &c. and warranted to arrest father's/ felons. By the inference to br drawn from this feet, it would appear that they had not this power originally, for if they had, where Ives the necessity of directing thlt from thenceforth they shouldossess it's 31r. Lambert says, their power in their individual capacity is little more than to admonish, and if they are not obeveskiii work by presentment at Sessions. And bind l'ioLe lays down the doctrine, that a man cannot be mewed and held to hai! for a crime cognizable in Sessions by one Justice of the Peace alone, and sitting out of Sessions. Hale says, that the Justice may issue his warrant sod bind the oft' nder over to appear at th• Sessions, althongli he he not iodicted. IH. H. 579. But in another place he says, " this seemeth doubtful." 2 H. H. 113.—And Hawkins on this point says, " It seems that anciently no one Justice could legally make out a warraut for an offence against a penal statute or other misdemeanour cognizable onlv by a Sessions of two or more Justices : for that one singl; Justice bath no jurisdiction of such of fence, and regularly those only who have jurisdiction overa cause ran award process concerning it; yet the long, constant, universal, and oneuntrouled practice of Jus tices of the Peace seems to hare altered the law in this particular, and to have given them an authority in Teta tion to such arrests not now to be disputed." 2 Hawk. c. 13, sec. 16.—50 that even by Hawkins, who opposed the doctrine laid down by Lord Coke, it appears to he a custom which had grotto info practice, and not a written law. Br statute 1 and 2 Phil. and Mary, chap. 13, Justices of the Peace are directed to certify the ex aminations of prisoners for manslaughter or felony. and the bailment of them to the next jail delivery, but no mention of libel is made in this k iirertion; and by the I,f:Mood omission itself they are ° " To hear and Jeter ine all and singular the f poisonings, enchant ments, sorceries, arts. trespasses, forestallinfs, rerratings, en grossi ions, unlawful assemblies, and all and singular the premises, according to the laws WA statut gland, as in the like ease it has been accustom ght to be done." This com mission was sett the Judges and Barons, with Sir Christopher mop ; then Lord - Chief Justice of the Court of King's _ a, at their head; and vet no men tion was made fa it of any power in a Justice to arrest and hold to_4lll for libel. But it wail be contesideol, on the part ofjp‘rfendant, that the word trespasses is of so generaiiitesure, that libel, aettudi to a brestch of the peace; oast be taken under it. By be lid of P,der. 111. c none AO be pat in answer accusation of the 0„,,, itt presestutesso- fu 41611 ease of the seven , 4 State Trials, XS, it was grimed they ought ti be ischargoil, !weenie they were prlilleged front ar rest, as bring Members of the Upper House of Parlia ment, when it was adjudged that the libel was a breach of the peace, and therefore their prayer was refused; lint that rase bad been not only doubted, but strongly disputed. In the eased the Queen r. lhtrby,Fortrecne 1411, the first exception was, that a Sweeten , of State could not commit for libel. The Attorney anti Solicitor Lieneral relied on this for an answer, that the warrant was nut a commitment, hut only for the purpose of examination ; they did not pretend to say that the Se cretary of State had the power of doing this, and Vim had not, surely it could not be possessed by a Justice of the Peace merely. It has been said that a lapel is &breach 1 of the peace, hot that was denied in Wilkes' case, where 1 it was held that it is not, and therefore a Member of I Parliament is entitled to his privilege. Aod Lord Cam den, in delivering the judgment of the Court, 2 Wits., observed, that they were all of opinion that libel was not a breach of the peace, but had only a tendency to it; and, added he, " I cannot find that a libeller has ever been bound to find surety of the pesre." The . Learned &deem, therefore, snbmitted, that the rosin must give judgment in favour of the plaintiff, or come to the resolution of overturning the cases of the seven Bishops, of Rex e. Wilkes. and of the Queen e. Derby ; and contended, that as this claim of jnrisdiction went directly in derogation of the liberty of the subject, it , should he strictly watched, and that the submission of poverty or guilt was not to be taken as a precedent or allowed as an authority. Ile cencleoled by observing,, that the 48 Oro. 111. e. SS, furnished an inference is leis, favour, for it gave the Judges of the King's Bench, who TIMW A N.. were, by virtue of their other, Magistrates, power to bind over a libeller, and he contended it was unnecessary if they Possessed that power before. Mr. Serjeant BOSAtrqurr, for the defendant, observed, that lie was justified on the plaintiff's own authority, fur having arrested and held him to bail. The only differ ence in any libel, was in its degree of aggravation, and as it might more or less tend towards a - breach of the peace. It is an offence contra parent, and therefore it comes under the jurisdiction of a Magistrate, who is to inquire into all felonies, trespasses, tcc. It has been contended on the other side, that libel cannot come under the definition of trespass, because it is not an actual breach of the peace ; but it is observed by Hawkins, that " the word trespass is of very general extent, and, in a large sense, not only compre . hends all inferior of fences which are properly and directly against the peace, as assaults and batteries, and such like, but also all others which are so only by construction, as all breaches of the law in general are said to be." And then, after noticing the power of Justices in felonies. kr., he adds, the word trespass has been undereased to extend to " such offences is have a direct and infino iliate tendency to cause such breaches of the peace, se , libels, and such like, which, on this account, have been adjudged indictable before Justices of the Peace."-2 Hawk, c. It, s. 311. Lord Coke defines libel to be a con tamely or reproach published to the defamation of the Government, of a Magistrate, or of a private person, and he says, it is indictable, because it tends to a breach of the peace. There had been four cases of arrest ; the two first were disputed, on the ground that they were privileged persons; the two last, that the war rants had been issued by the Secretary of State. In the two first, the cases of the 'even bishops and of Ala, Wilkes, they assumed the arrest would have been good, hut that they were privileged persons. In Wilkes 's case, they did not affect to say that *private person might not be arrested. The authority of a Se cretary of State has till lately been more infirm, be cause be cannot administer an oath. A man may, upon the slightest assault, be rommitted in default of hail ; and in libel, which may provoke an aggravated breach of the peace, shall it be said that the 3agiotrate has not the like jurisdiction ? Lord Hale, Lord Holt, and Haw kins, are all opposed to Lord Coke, agreeing that a man may he held to bail before indictment found. Coke &- MAI the power of Justices, even though the statute of Philip and Mary had Is-en passed jest before. It is contended, that the Magistrate has only potter in felo nies, but he has, in common assaults, and in an v thing which tends to the disturbance of the peace. to need not dread the effect of the power of the Magistrate,' since the Habeas Corpus Act will prevent imprison ment without cause. .t Magistrete may commit for treason, although it be beyond his jurisdiction. He is • mended to " keep all oriliminees," and must he not. therefore, prevent all possibility of assaults ? Hawkins, as has been shown, expressly inelndes libel. It has been asserted that Hale and Hankins confine the power of the Magistrate to actual breaches of the peace; but the passage cited shows, that Hawkins intends that which has a tendency to a breach of the peace. Hal ton's Justice of the Peace, c. 123, page 217, says, " using words which shall tend to a breach of the peace ;" and in r. 124, he says, 6' libellers may he Noon' for their good behaviour." In Kendal e. Wear, Skinner 596, the Court considered the power of a Magistrate and a Secretary of State in arrest analogous. There never was a doubt as to the right of the Magistrate, for in Queen Anne's reign there were 43coumiiinients, in that of George 136, George 11. 63, and in the third year o f I iirorge 111, there was also a precedent ; from that time till the 41st there were none, and it was this cessation which first caused the doubt that hail now been argued. It appeared too, that many others had been arrested for speaking seditious words; bet as they had not been held to bail, they were nut included in the return hr had jest read. l'pon the whole, he contended that the Ma gistrate hail the power, and therefore he prayed judg ment for the defendant. The Court said, they would bear the reply on Monday. —Adjourned. COURT OF REQI 7 ESTS, GrILONALL. On Saturday Mr. Sheriff Parkins attended at this Court to answer the summons of a publican in the neighbourhood of \ea•gate-street, a•ho demanded from the Sheriff the sum of I/. 135., the balance of a bill of $l. 13a., incurred at an entertainment given by him to the Carlisle Election Committee, on the 18th of Mar, Pt appeared from the statement of the publiran, that punch, nexus, brandy, and runt, haul been served to the Committee at the time they were at work to secure the election of the Worthy Sheriff, who, however, obtained but a very small number of efficient friends upon the oc casion. *Five pounds had been paid, but all applications for the balance had been ineffectual. The Sheriff declared, that he had given orders to the publican not to serve up more than U. worth of punch, and that the hill produced had been recently fabricated for the purpose of defrauding him. The publican said, the Sheriff had placed no limit to the orders of the company, and that the charge was smaller than it ought to be, broken glasses not haring been charged, and the waiter haying received nut a farthing. The Sheriff declared, that if the publican swore to the debt, a prosecution for perjury should he instituted. The publican did not hesitate to swear, a”11 the money was paid. The Sheriff left the Court, saying, that he would make an example of the plaintiff. POLICE. animal' OP TIM •ATN AND BRISTOL NAIL. MastsioN-Ilocac.—lV. frateoa, a lias Mellish, Jsha Pla . kfieir, and if Bonifitee,were brought np for re examination on Saturday, when the former, on the oath of a gentleman whet saw hint in the roach at Martha reagit, was filly committed for trial. The other two were remanded till Thursday. liVlLDHALL.—Frantiteo kw TA ey, Phill(pp• George, and Peter Bury°, three foreigners, wer e on Saturday charged by the superintendent at the Ilefsige fur the llonseless:in London Wall. with having purloined some of the stores. The prisoners, it appeared, had been ad mitted for the night into the institution, and slept in that part of the premises immediately adjoining the room where the stores and clothing were deposited. Early in the morning they contrived to cut a hole through the partition, and by means of a stick, with a hook at the cud of it, got possession of several articles. They were, however, observed by a man who slept in the same room, and who gave information of the eir cnutstance. An officer was sent fair, and, en searching the prisoners George and Burney, there were found ou the former two pair of new flannel drawers, and the latter a new jacket and a pair of new gaiter*, belonging to the Committee. The prisoner Hueco, though not ob served to lie concerned. was strongly suspected to be a participator in the rohhery : he was therefore closely watched, and shortly after was detected in throwing a 1 new pair of flannel drawers down the privy; a pair ofi gaiters were also found concealed iie the straw where he had slept. All three of the prisoners had been in the house a short time before. and, when discharged, had beep relieved with cloaths anal money. The Committee, were not desirous of prosecuting the fellows, and they were therefore committed to hard labour i n street Colorer for one month each. 111WINDLINI BOIV-STRZlT.—Saturday, holier/ Liras, a man gold chaser, was examined on seteral of fraud. It was stated that this man was one of a swindlers, who, for some time pat have been prM an extensive system of fraud. bey consist de m , hi have been employed in different houses in the j ee , diti and cloth trades, who availed themselves of their ledge of different connections tow rite orders for j ewilin or other goods. On Tuesday last the prisoner iny ini the shop of Haniburglier, Harwood, and c o. 1(44 manufisoturers in King -street, Covent -gard en , .4 1 order, purporting to be written by a master tad * Bond -street, who was in the habit of sendin g orders, for seven yards of gold lace. The lace Ir a q Dished to bins, but before he had long left the shad( hand was discovered, and he was pursued sad takesi g custody. Several other tradesmen preferred similar ch" and the prisoner was fullc committed. Wottsalr-Sfmarr.--J; Am Williams andSerah p,„„ were on Saturday brought before K. BIYILI., Esq. presiding Magistrate, charged with assaulting j Graham on the King's highway, and rubbing Id a , one pound's worth of silver, an I tw-Ive oitrht-pence in copper, the property of Ihvid James Oralsam said, he was an apprentice is 1 1 / 4 ,, Miller, tallow-ch:tudler, No. MI, Bunkill-row. U s r i day afternoon he was sent by his master to take d i dozen of candles to Mr. Hillback, of Golden-lane, f el whom lie received the money fur them and for ot h iti ticks delivered the day before. The money was l i h him in a p ttttt worth of silver, and twelve and eight-pence in copper. He put the moues is` basket, and on his way home, about four o'clock,' through Cow-heel-alley, lie was stopped by the wis h prisoner. who was pretendedly playing with I a l and which ever nay he owned, they still got before` to stop his progress. At this time six or acres sh fame up and closed upon him, and in that situation searched his pockets. Finding nothing there, th e !goiter, John It illiattis, pulled the basket from his der, and seizing hold of the silver and copper ra g leaving: the basket behind hint. Tweedy, a constable of St. Luke's parish, ki l o formed of this transaction, went with Prime, officer, and, from the description given, suspectingt soner, John Williams, whom they found talking to other men, they took them into custody, and road them to Mr. liillbarles shop, the boy immediately edont Williams as the man who had pulled the his shoulder, and ran away with the money. Tiny terwards took the woman Powell and anotiterms. custody, and the buy immediately recognised the but said lie knew nothing of the man. The prisoners denied knowing any thing robbery. 1 hey were committed to Newgate for trial. CORUNA/CS DEPUTIES. -a.- A few days since an inqnest was held on tbe hdri W. Harrison, a boy It years of age, who was incautiously removing a trap from a carding esgisal Mr. Howard's manufactory, at the Nether blil i Leeds, in which he unfortunately got entaseld, was so maimed that the upper and lower parody burly were nearly severed from each other. A who attended from one of the newspaper officesit was dismissed the rs.uw, with the eMiervatios,' the attendance of such persons might he musket Manchester law, but it was sot law at lAS Wilcock, the Depetv of Mr. .1. Atkinson, th. having administered the oaths tp the Jury, au the necessary preparations far taking the wpm,* following conversation took place : Mr. V. ilcock—We must now, gentlemen, gels& firmail to view the body. Foreman—Will the l'oroner meet us at the Mr. Wilcock—No; I am appointed to take tis for him. Foreman—Will that be legal Mr. Wilcock—l do it constantly. Forautan—Hoes not the law require, and will OM preamble set forth, that thisinqoisition was takes J. Atkinson, gentleman, Coroner of the beewtl Leeds ; and will not the Jury be required to sit s natnes and seals to that document. Mr. Wilcock—Yes. Foreman—Then I, for one, must decline to de such thing, knowing at the time it is not true. The Deputy then proposed that the Forman withdraw, and that another Juror should be s his stead ; but to this he objected, on the grsoW he haul taken the oath, that lie would diligently t ■nd true presentment make, into the case POW consideration. After some further conversatiss, Foreman, addressing himself to Mr. Wilcock, You may recollect, that recently a high legal as decided, that an inquisition was null and veil; some weeks labour, because the Coroner was set sunnily present with the Jury, on view of the • Mr. Wilrock—You most likely allude to the inquest, which was a very different thing ; this isa common arcident. Foreman—lf you know what the case is, eke the necessity of swearing us diligently to imptirell It is fur us to decide, not you. A Jnryinan—lf the Foreman is of opinies di Coroner cannot legally appoint a Deputy, he '4 haps, think that we are not legally sworn, WWI can retire conscientiously. Forenian—lf the Deputy will say that I am asllq sworn, I will retire. Mr. Wilcock—No. as matters have bees tea to this length, the Coroner shall take the self, and you (looking at the Foreman) AT; lecture from I • Foreman—A what, Sir? Mr. Wilcock—You shall hear what the Cot say about it. Foreman —Very well, Sir. About a quarter past seven o'clock the Cereal rived, and commenced the business afresh, by ?Pi ing the Court and re-swearing the Jun., witlioute! a single word upon the objection to his Deper.. a due itiveatitration, the Jury returned a moo 't Accidental death.- BIRTHS. nu Mongol Ai his. house in M Lad) of HenryUbborne. Esq. of a _ Yenterday reoroine•. in itaker-direak Lady of Mr Gregor) Paps Turner. Oast. of a MARRIED. On Thursday last, John Iludgson. Esq. nf to Mary, daughter of John Godfrey, Esy. of rod• - - - DIED. At Penzance. Jan. 31. nudist Frinees. youngest • of Lady Thendosia Vtner, and sister of Robert VP II4 of Oanihy. Lincolnshire. Oast 11 On Monciat last. after a long and serrre • Vlearare, Wootton Bassett. Wilts. foroli•• Rev. Thomas Hyde Ripley, and dilltlitrr 01 11111 Huneywood, Esq. of Marks Hall. Essen. London : Printed and Published by the R.WARifIELL. Jun. at the Oiler. No. ltd. • site St. Clement's Church: wherr. all Como. der,. and Adtertiseenents are requested SoP 1/.1 W ti LP" - . limo i L f l rit n e hog NI