The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-08-18 00:00:00

be. 10•16= 1 , 14 ; 12 lab i r Calitim. mo The F. al Of Ltrierooi li pionkhl thhrthis• was by 1) weans. a convenient stage of the proceedings for tio coa rse pointed out by the Noble Lord. The cliar -04 moor of proceeding he conceived was, the usual co rm of prone/ling. The llahlrris o( LANODOWN said that he could nut tonett r Even, in the limited view which the Noble and •L e areed Lord had tak e n of this questi o n , namely, that sipuce of their Lordships would be saved by going she evidence hefure hearing any objections to the encipk of the Bill, because the facts might not be proved at all. tie thought that even in this view of t h e q uestion the argument lay quite the other way. Thar were higher considerations, however, than the esavenience of this liouse, anti that convenience ought Bet to he pot in competition with any possible roarer by which the flonse tuight be spared the necessity of * le painful disclosta. s. It was leer, however, that if ;ha counsel were allowed to object to the principle if the Dill now, they would not be permitted to du so a ere nfter. He thought, therefor.% that the best course swell hr, to give them their option as to the time at they would deem it most expedient to address • ete;r Lordships. l'ite Loan Coatecht.ton having pat the question, , 1 10 was carried rrithoht I division, said he w esissowled by the H u e to inform her Majesty's. Ceaastl, that they h their opinion either to he tweed *jot the principle of the Bill tem., or at a future seyeef the proceedings, but that if they made their elee tins to ad.tress their Lordships now, they would not hi permitted to discuss the principle of the Bill hereafter,. Counsel being again ordered to withdraw, Mr. Broaeliem retired as before, and again adeeneed hi the liar. The order to withdraw, however, being rei terated in • hold tone from some parts of the House, Hr. liontglient and the rest of her Majesty's Counsel retired from the Bar. The &Mot Lott - neon tit observed from the gallery, that if the principle of the Bill were now discussed, the Counsel would preclude themselves hereafter from urging such arguments against the principle of the Bill as the course of the evidence might suggest. The Howse were now in effect making a bargain with her 'Majesty's Counsel, as to the mode of conducting their client's ease ; a course which he must deprecate a, wholly unprecedented. The Loan CimaNceLion having again called upon her Majesty's Counsel to make their option, Mr. Buouottsu rose and said—l have in the first place to spologi• • to your Lordships for not h avin g imam- I diatelv withdrawn from your Lordships' Bar in the man ner which, as it seems, would have been most agreeable to your Lordships. Many of your Lordships, who are sot much in the habit of witnessing judicial proceedings is this Nouse, may not be aware that retiring from the Bar, is a mere formality, and that it is usual for Conn sel epos these occasions to retire half a step from the Bar, and then to tome forward. I mention this with a view of removing any impression that 1 was intention al's guilty of the slightest disrespect to your Lordships, aoa &ems 1 em aware that there are many even in this House who sue ready to misconstrue every thing—(Loud cries of (Irder").—lf I understand the terms upon which /Hall be permitted to address your Lowhihips against doe prittelphr of the Bill, I am to be precluded keseetterkent addressing any observations to your Lord.„ slips,rsecpt as to the truth ut.folrelsood of she allega tions. r whieNbe 'oldster is meant to support. 1 atoll certainly make my election without one tuomuent's hesita tion, and avail myself of the permission to be heard even open these terms. 1 do this with entire satisfaction to soy own mind, because I know too well the justice which reigns in this place, not to be perfectly certain, that, it unexpectedly any thing conies oat in the course of the mreidenee free which your Lordships may had it neces sary for the ends of substantial justice to revise your opinion, that opinion will not he considered irrevocable, and I shall not be precluded from again addressing your Lordships against the principle of the Bill. My Lords, my first objection to this Bill is, that it Is a private 'awl made for a particular case, and for the punishment of is , particular individual. Unhappily laws of this nature are known in the jurisprudence of this, and of all other countries ; but they have never been resorted to in any country even In the worst of rinses, without a dedp emir of their hateful nature, and of their atter vereetwantett to every prple of justice. Prom the earliest thereof the Roman - Code, private laws were known by tint name of prisifimie t and they were divided by Civilians into two alassim.oneof which was favourable tattle object of enact ... ' meat, the ether hostile to him, and dlstidgeished by the same ofgrieilegisms odiossurt. Snch was the stigma which Inds commits,as well acquainted with theforceoflaegn age • 'as witirthe Value of the principles of jostles, hen aimed to this species of law, thereby marking M alter times that Baer ?leased it to be a measure of a Isatelei descrip tion, which nothing bat absolete necessity timid justify. These laws are to he found most frequently in the black est pages of the Roman annals.—They are Invariably es poet Arlo laws. They first permit the Bed .to be dose, and whether the pity is to he deemed innocent or guilty is matter of subsequent inquiry; et Wheel after perndtting the deed to be done, without any notices er wares to the party scented, they met that it shall be demsert and taken to be equity. 1 Riddbe gnihy of childish pedantry were 1 to occupy your Lordships' time in TMIOIIIIO O 010 hint oyy of past or is prow lug that tge iAlest and blot of MI6 mit even those who were net theu of obis, •LW still the honour td shudder at this most noiesdfiable mode it legislaticni.—Snffiee it to say, that she Weer, of eve own country, etas in its worst periods, bow to the dettetation In which such measlier tier Without eittering into minute details 1 Mill jut refer your Lordships to the attainder.' of Mortimer old Amadei, in the reigns of Edward 11. amid Edward ILL which were measures introdoeed upon. he prewure of • temporary emergency. 1 will pass over the reign of Henry VIII. that b ar baroua, detested, and justly ed, Monarch; d testable for his nnprincipleil spoliation; for his heartless cruelty, and for his violation of the I tenderest ties, and I will take my stand at a period of a better deseription, the reign of ehatieli 1. and 11. Yowl Lordships will probably rail to mind the atteinderolifl l Lord Strafford, the greatest disgrace, even in due ward of times, float ever sullied the purity of either Hooting, Parliament.—Your Lordships will the rather ,I• mind the case of the Earl of Strafford, because cited, and, for aught 1 know, apps by •-- Leseiskips, in the Report of the v =for recedents in rues eat Cti I say ? It wool ti •OP of justice had the EaL p cit would then have been .ceLaNnWA.tcob, while the princi ruts would at least %or' to yontl2l eve eeteestoes entertained thristriZnirriall. isjo‘stien. 1 11111 read to yoor Lemke old& ihey -reotirded thgr opinioef itee of the molt eloquettt have sow the honour to address, at impression upon the judgment. as ti • of those predecessors of your Lordsh .:~ I . that, upon various no hopes to. precentor, struction of the expeeits I reverse this .„ _ anjoat . merable words, I! And to the end that right be done to the memory of the deceased Earl, w'ao was thus mur dered, be it enacted further, that all records and pro ceeding of Parliament relating to this attainder be wholly cancelled, defaced, and obliterated, to the intent that the same may not be risible its after ages, to be brought into example to the prejudice of any person whatsoever."—Of this description, substituting only for life, rank the most illustrious, and station the most ex• silted, privileges the most esteemed among men, and what is higher than all the rest, and dearer than each, every thing that is t dear to character, feeling and honour, the Uili which slow lies upon the table of your lawatships belongs strictly and even technically to the class which your Lordships' pr-deceseors have thus characterised. The reversal of Lord Stratford's attain der manifests the meanly sense which our ancestors en tertained of that abauninable measure. It may be re garded as a beacon to warn posterity, as a landmark bar after es, when future Princes and future Parlia ments mi gh t he tempted to commit similar acts of in justice.v Lords, I have stated the opinion of roar Lordships Predecessors in the case of the Wel of Strata Coral, but 1 will venture to say, that the attainders in the worst of former times, not even excepting any of the attaindcrs of Henry the Eighth's Wives, were menhir, consistent, or judicial sets, compared with this. la the first place nothing illegal is charged against her Majesty. This I am bound to say, boils in consequence of the deci sion of the Judges, and still snore upon the fare of the whole proceedings, that there was no possibility of pro ceeding at law. If any act had been committed in violation of the law, I am bound to suppose that the extraordinary proceeding of a Bill of Pains and Pe nalties would dot have been resorted to. Nothing illegal has been done—nothing illegal is charged against her Majesty. This is a most material consideration, to which I humbly crave your Lordships' attention. Although no law has been violated, it does not follow that no ju dicial proceeding could be resorted to; because impeach ment is expressly and emphatically provided for the trial 'of matters cognisable by the ordinary course of law. I do not mean to say that one class of proceeding is neees sarily excluded in the renunciation of the other, but that crimes and misdemeanours which cannot be indicted in Ilet Courts of Westminster, are nevertheless cognisable beftwe your Lordships by impeaehment. In Lord Straf 41wd'a case an impeachment had been resorted to, but it was apprehended that it might fail, and a Bill of Attain- I der was accordingly commenced in the Lords, while the Impeachment was still pending. Why was not im peachment resorted to in the present case? Wits the tattered and ragged evidence considered of so desperate I a character, that no hope could be entertained of your Lordships' concnrreoce in a charge of impeachment ? Why were your Lordships distrusted ? If the papers sub mitted to the other House of Parliament bad been sent op here with a view to impeacheneot, if managers had bead sent up from the other tlonse, they would at any rage been allowed the proceeding to go on. See, nay Lords, how much we bare In-en tleprived - of by not adopt her this course. If an impe.sehmeut had been preferred. the charzes would bare bveta .ilecially drawn up with a convenient certainty; we .;sould have been furnished with a list of witnesses, a n I with all those advantages *hick belong to a real jo.licial proceedi . 'Omagh I am swan that year Loedobitio hare NMI 161 conduct this proceeding in the spirit of justia" your Lordships will forgive me when I say, that this is not a jmHeial proceeding. I amprepared to spew, as well from the wethority of rases decided in this House, as from the recent protests of virtuous minorities, that snch acts as the present ought never to be resorted to sinless from absolute necessity, either to avert name impending danger from the State. or to prevent an absolute failure of justice. In a Protest drawn up by Lord Chancellor Cowper, it is said that nothing short of such an absolute necessity can justify such a proceed ing as that now before its. What, then, is the im pelling. or over-ruliug necessity which can justify the present measure % Is the succession in danger'? It bas never been alleged or surmised that the sue cession can by any possibility be endangered. If her Majesty had been brought alp for trial under the Statute Edward II I. timer', this was decided to he impossible, and mint admitting the allegations against her to be tree for the sake of argument, yet when the long separatio, 1 ' and the age of the parties were considered , no possibnle danger could he apprehended to the purity of the Royal succession. The want of heirs may be one ground of danger to the - encerssion, hot I shill dismiss this with out any observation, because no mats pretends that the succession is emlaugered Irons this c a use. It has been said, that the conduct imputed to her Majesty has a tendency to degrade the Crown, anal the Nation with which she I. connected, and that that connection ought therefore to be I , :lken off.—lf these charges were brought forward against my client while Princess Of Wales, can any one doubt that a divorce must have been sought for in the ordina . gway—that alb the usual f7srmsa upon inch an occasion must have been gone throttglo— that the seater the divorce 1111114 himself hers esenter aletition w i rer Lordships—and, above all, went must Isere come into Court with clean bands l ? e period whets my client was Princess of Wales . was a lowed to go by. These acensatioos were d midi she became Queen, and than care seemed to , been taken todepri ve her of the e i g hts ofa p rivate so 1 I do not, however, say that these rights are gone r bet ethers do, and this eseciedloory course of me lb ,!sorted to upon t h e alleged ground ne . . Upon th is plea it is attempted t o b ' an gement forezeludint _theQueonfrointisouseightso ich on: gther . .fetnale Ip t he coaster). _would, on at na love.* oteasTon, lie illewell to exercise wittiest dis pole—which could not, date any reteuce, be refused Iwo client, if these priseeledings had been instituted wait her AM she was Princess of Wales. But i contend that her Majesty "Wield be allowed the lame privilegtos nor as formerly, *swept° tune, us the lawyers tiy. Vier 11(tikty must indeed be, is common /quay, entitled' to tiri& f Silltle rights and weans of de fende against the attack made in this Bill, as If dam *tack had made upon . her while Princess of Wales.. I .licow rouse to another part of the case, and I have to Implore tour Lordships to pause while yet on the thresholof of this extraurdisory proceeding, sod *bus avert the consequenen *hick Ire but too likely to fol low if yon determine to rmevere. I will net now ad vert to any topleioireernnination. I stolid, indeed, most deeply deplore the painful necessity : of doing so • ocesasess. Bat she sigh! ,rumination 1 Asia. It will she postpone all argu certain conduit* previous to the Marriage of To that intimations and all-important not advert at present. I will postpone _ such a discussion as long an possible, until, indeed, I may be compelled to resort to it by the last n-eessity. But should that necessity arise, an ad vocate has bet one duty, and no names, principali ties, or even nations, shall, prevent me from per forming that solemn duty which I owe to my client. I will, however, do every thing in my pow* to stop the progress of this Bill, in order to avert the deplorable necessity of duly animadverting upon such language as the preamble contains ; such, fur instance, as " a most unbecoming and degrading intimacy " with " a fo reigner of low station " who had been "engaged in her service in a menial situation," anti with whom my client is accitseti of having " an indecent and offensive familiarity," anti carried on an adulterous intercourse. But the preamble pettiest:es that this Bill is necessary from a " regard for the dignity of the Crown and the honour of the nation." Now, how conies it that the dignity of the Crown and the honour of the nation dumb( be so deeply concerned in this question as to compel von to proceed ? The contrary , indeed , is the fact, ana I feel myself hound to tell your Lordships that this preamble speaks falsehood—that it states that which is by no means rorreet. We are not arrived at that state of eseesAive polish which, would forbid us front calling things by their proper name and I would ap peal to the spirit of Justice whic h presides in this House, but especially to the spirit of holiness, and to the heads of the Church, whether, if adultery he a crime ott the part of a female, it he not a crime also on the part of a male; or whether, if the dignitrof the Crown and the honour of the nation be so tarnished by the practice of what the preamble to this Bill called " adul terens intercourse" on the part of a female member of the Royal Family as to render necessary a Bill of Pains and Penalties, the adultery of a male member of that family should be allowed to escape the visitadon of any I such aseasuet ? But the ellegation in this preamble is a fallacy, or bow clone it that no Bill of Pains and Pe nalties, nor legislative measure whatever was ever pro- , posed in consequence of the adultery of a certain male member of the Royal Family, which some years ago was not only proved, but confessed by his Royal High er.. himself. It is, I assure your Lordship, with pecu- • liar pain that this statement is wrung from me; for no ' one can be more aware than myself of the obligation which not only England, but all Europe, owes to th e : services of that most illustrious individual to whom it refers. In mentioning this circuinstar.ce, indeed, I have no disposition whatever to act harshly towards his Royal Highness, brit in order to record my opinion of the i motives and principles of the base conspiracy with which that proceeding originated. As an advocate 1 felt my self compelled too to state, that the allegation of the I authors of this Bill was unfounded, even in the views of those persons themselves, or the adultery confessed in 1809 by the Illustrious Individual to whom I hare re ferred, would have been met by some similar measure ; for the conduct of his Royal Highness was pronounced of a most derogatory character, in a Resolution proposed in the other House 6f Parliament, by one of the very authors of the present Bill. But no Bill of Pains and Penalties was ever mentioned, or even hinted at upon that occasion, nor was it even pretended that it was necessary to " the dignity of the Crown and the ho none of the nation" to propose any measure of the kind. I ask whether seebosegoot be eonsieteet, er whether It ° . _ La Jsurisa.. 411 1 . tan 2 . ii --- that it 11111bisiMis rVet;fibe Royal Fatally may all do what they plasm, while if calumny shoalil fix a stain npon shy female belonging to that family, who should happen to be abroad, whither she was encouraged to go, who was left at foil liberty to indulge herself thefts; she pleased, she should, u pon her reitrn home, i have a Bill of Pains and Penalties immediately preferred egainst her, upon the hypocritical, ranting, and dis glisting pretence, that snch a proceeding was necessary to the maintenance of the dignity of the Crown and the !gamine of the nation ? We in England way call this proceeding by what name we please. We may pro nounce it a serious and solemn measure, but what are our continental ueighbours likely to think of ft ? Is it not possible that they may regard it with Ifity, if not with disgust, and that they may suppose the ratio sne sunk and the ratio jostifies are considered the saute In this country? I would then exhort your Ldrdsitips, for the sake of the reputation and judgment. as well as for the sake of the peace and interest of this country, not to allow its grave, rational enlightened and moral character, as well as its internal tranquillity, to be sacrificed, in order to gratify the caprice or will of any individual, by the adoption of a measure of such an extraordinary purport as that before the House.— II y this measure It Is proposed to motet a di cvore in a pe e be u liarly total meaner i for where. 1 ask, can an instance fogad is the yawls history of the law, where, after a legal marriage, which I assume that between their Majesties to have been, it 4*, ever attempted to dissolve that marriage, exempt epos actual proof of adultery‘ sad up9q the *NlS adios of tbs husband, or party aggrieved ? It is provilleil. indeed. hi yser Lordships' Standing Orders. that the husband who applies for a divorce, shall attend the lieu's in order that he himself may be pe aty lted before the divorce Is granted, Rh should be thought nesesaary from any sue *lose( eollasion, ao as .totaacertala whether lie came into Covet rogue to curia. 34 the charge against my client, upon which st divorce Is sought in the present Rill, is not that of adultery. but " adeiterovs iatereoarse." which is an offence animehn to see law. In order to facilitate the din solutios of the soared hoed of marriage. it has been (WM. IdOlitily mmertad. that it is not a religious. but a civil coo* ;tract ,l's rebut this assertion, I could q uote the opielens Of Ibil Skint dithies, end soundest l aw y ers this , T 12.4 itits litte %owe. or to whom the guardianship of public iasiitutions were ever ems tl" at gaits 'Rough to read an extrac t from '"'"_ r" if the grei,lest Consistorial Judges Eng -- 1 mean Illr Walter Scott. who. in deli we %. .e.4.-*/* flie ON Imo of Gordon v. Dalrymple. seep . egiggele I—" Marriage is a contract of i Natural Ism ,* Was woo. sot the child, of eivil society. as civil society it becomes a civil contract, registered and proscribed by la*, and rendeted of cieril consequent.) In most civilised eottettles seNag wider a striae of Um force of . • it has the as of religion soperadded. . a wiliglitas and civil contract. f or It is is that because it is the one. the-re 'l p i aoftli=illiii"other. /Mayor itaejf is mar , lilt* eltilleastreltd the congeal of the iailiv isi o ais le eiNlMOlllsteidp•magfied gad coqficased bar a I new 010111.C4-40elahouel,s. B.—Mark a. is it pot dbl.. Ohm thetywer Lordships can ever he 'Persuaded to I.llsl .sipas .handi upon such a 'treed compact— NMI yet Wee 'Melvin to .put amender these whom God lallialleaillitor to cut that knot which hails. been tied by the I 1 taws of God and man 1 Hut how can your Logiitips be recovelled to such a deed in the manger prorsed OHMS, where the bus -cure, however, reit:lived all hie laferesaliois epee the 'object at** office of the Secretary of saw. ft appears. indeed. Mgt itlY Learned Friend did net got* any other place for Intel igence. from an apprehension, perhaps, to at a cession phrase, that he ntightgo farther and fee wort*. My Learned Friend has. It would seem, boss employed by nobody, sod. two. constituted, be applies to poet Lordship) for the adoptimrof this now unprecedented and Illegal proceeding; for the adop tion, indeed, of a measure which is splits' s4' the goal ogles of law, and for the dissolutiod of a Mad held sailhd by the whole of our dvii aid *telegenic*, ineispentienee. But will your Lordships allow me to ash, whether there isnot enough of evidence berate yea and the essutry to show that the ground upon which this 818 Is *hedged to be noneesiar, namely, a regard to theffigaity of the Crown and the hooto or of the nation. Is • mere geromeaes, that indeed it is quite 10 at/et-thought? la eider to form • sweet jadgmews of d:• views of men it is certainly better to look to their treindlet %Eh their language. That is a good rep at sag MUM bet especially at tech times IN the fir Allt with regard 1.) sueh politicians as those with who m DIN appears to have orientated. 1 should, indeed, rather look to an am of sac persons for the illustratiom of their real views sad prinri pies to whale volumes of speeches tit writings. It ma: be -said, that I cannot precisely tell who are the *Mors of the present lint But I must preemie those are the authors of the Bill who laid before Parliament the papers topole wide!' it professes to be founded. Those wiio advised her Majwity to go abroad against her owe wishes are perfectly well known. At • period of life wlieo her Majesty was not turally SONtOUS for the enjoyment of omietade, she arae en couraged by those sdvisees to seek that qoiletude in a foreign lend. where every promise tell prdaket of oesefort was heiu net to tier. Those advisers were opposed. Her M . ojesti was told by Gentlemen wke,ofered to stoke their heads for Use fact, that she would be quite safe If she reensised in di:, eountry. lam stating that to which I myself put my bard. It was stated) to her Majesty, that if she should go abroad, she would be surrounded by spies, and that Some plot would be formed sesta* her. Thee, stelainents were however en availing. Her Majesty did go abroad ; and how far the he visers who sought to dissuade her from shat proeeedieg were correct calculators, her situation could fully illy trate. In compliance with the apialoa 'of those wise con trived to counteract her faithful counsellors. she went to the Continent; and upon her return it was her fate Iron he r professed frieeds arrayed against hoe, upon the pr south. that in consequence orb* revere sibs ought to be lito %muted for alleged miscontluct, in which I: seemed she might revel to any extent If she would only reetain *treed. Th ere was no objection, it appeared. if she would do so, that she should Indulge in any liberty she pleased—tioat she 'hote:4 have that sort of unlimited toleration which was offered to her many years ago, upon certain conditions. Bet hey - ng determined to return to England, that ship which was sue ready to carry her Majesty away from Fstplaisd was refe.ti to convey her home. She was alleged to have been guilty four years ago of the offence charged upon her in the present Bill, and yet no proceedingwas instituted or menaced alienist her until she thought proper 'to mime home. Until then.:, was not alleged or insinuated that it was necessarry for the dignity of the Crows, and the how* of the nation, to take any measure against her Majesty. Not a word, not a rumour. not a breath, indeed, was ever heard of any such mestere or pretence, until her Majesty same home. Her Majesty might, It appears, act as she pleased among foreigners. whp envied and hated England: she might exhibit any spectacle she desired to their jealous eyes, without interferiqg with the dignity of the Crown and the honour of the natiow,6ol to e moment she set her foot on English soil that digeity k hono-r called for her proseeutiod end panishasent. lam aware that propositions were made to her Majesty, if she uvula agree to certain terms, and that up even till the Mb hoar. the pro spect of compromise was held out. These propeeitiews were. however, accompanied with the thee*, the pnblieation of which gave, it seems, very greet offeisee. But bow was her Majesty treated throughout( die whole of this case, and how were the long suffering people of this country treated also She would have been permitted to-enjoy the rash which it leeressted pension, with tallriien enFo peesse 'Stmt the pre sent Bill called adulterous letereouise, if she would noty coutinue on the Continent, and abstain from visiting Eta land. Ho that If she was as ertesittal as her scoaserskillefo• .1. she was to be allowed la larger 'salary fur the more eat ad ed enjoyment of that criminality; if sae would only he re conciled to a foreign residence, no charge wha!evet ww. to be brought against her of any injury to the dignity of the Crown and the bosom. of the station. These 'Motets or phantoms were, *deed. only raised upon her Mejpaty's ar rival in this country. This review .of she euswinct of the authors of the present Bill must serve, I think. entllelentli to illustrate their character, and tannest to your Lordihips. as men of gegseity end itossied sense, as men of just principles and geeereas views, be above ell, as men of honour, whe ther such a measure 'Mehl be !'lowed to proceed farther. Let me beg your Leedublja r fo White your steps by stop ping the progress of a 11111;411. principle and irtriou,:e at which are so utterly exesipllolllll6l. • 1.1 Is the eissraeter of wisdom to *betoken erne theallinket it is diacotered. amt the sooner any erroneous course is given up e th better. hope and trust then that year ILek**lges wilt not be isdnced. for the gratilltraius of any mart, to prosecute 'this or stir other measure upon idle pretences mid at the hazard of ao soluse rule. and that by rejecting wilt a proposities y will set as becomes your duty, eonllolt the salvation of •';.• country, as well as the real and substantial honour of Crown. The Loan 01s:section observed, that IS there were only two Counsel to he beard upon this suOret, the seems% was then at liberty to address**. Houma ~ Mr. Danwax said., that it yrap•liis intention to address some observations to their Lo4•4llhfpt, bat as the beer was arrives' at which as adjoarnmeed weeleapeetest to take l a.. • cud as from the state of his Itealtlt,be was then enable to proceed, be requested their Lordsrps wools! be so Oust as to adjourn the metiers proceesifingrest. toirruir. Lord TAVERTOOL observed. Om; alter what the Learned Counsel had stated, he thought he Virg sere three enfild ps , hat one with in the Rowe as tersheipespriety of tempi_ iug with his request. He therefore mined that the Hasse Itaidild adjourn. The Loan CIIIANCTLIaII stated. that only two insel would be beard threagliest , eithet for or against Bill. About half-past ken* easels the hoes. sdjotinshil IWO t J iea e'eloek this day. when Übe eels vill. be reseme4ll! , meol . nusierstmed that It will 10 pinaussod Is until six u .lack. VIE MINORITY 111 1 r OF LORDS. imit STOPPING ALL ritOCIIIISINfiI AGAINST TIM SKIES , avoaler 17. Duke of Leinster. Earl Amistimia. Vise.d SI y klogA_ Soineriet, Carnory on, L0r,14. Fit Sele. Bedford, Orostersor, ilstydir, Argyle. Thailjt, Clif.lco. Hamilton. ;;: i = Aselitand, St. Alban's. Damidi, Merq.ofDown.hire. . A/olard, ... Doerr, Earl of Essen. The .lAploo, riTalliiit mi. Darnley. Lords. Dlilifill„ liomr/e-. Jersey. 0 4 1 . 1 11119 110 . Doeie. Albemarle, Dowser. -111oRkod, !Wroth. ToeleSallOg . opiate, Besboroogit. . II ..1 mi.--; liesiX vt • '.5 Stanhope, rri --. At irr %Vain or worsts:tag moats, ime to as- sitiasella , do ammo vt-Tss iontsal , „ j i • . 14. , The Berl of goildforo. TberL ord girabdtia , ' I I '. 1 ' " I ... , wrbi.z__A, ... Milli If . i ....... 1 1&....iplitiet+ 1 agfig t : • ...." V , - -. 1 7 ,- I T i. . rations Prete xts„ the turbulent party seeing arise to call foe L. Wiese unjust designs by soy ordlusrY manta upon certi they slid at last resolve to attempt the de- their Majesties. that Earl by an Act of Parliament made for purpose, they proceed to rescind, repeal, andti t I n te r s t il l ansg-r-ir will of sir 1 said anjest Art, and then to ad d these tue- until. ind eed. i 1 Stratioru, 0c5.....-_ , proved by some of your I "'lt d"P I Y ile,Pw rr . '"' r••••••-• - rig t ht of recrimination - on I Yost Lonisier ... .--- Committee sppointed to i t a b "l2 any of Invclient Icould e ise withoat di- ' estraordiestry widteer proposed by Shit Rill, where the bus- a •••• ........ of impeachment. Ins- „lo a p art •t bi • ' th e c° • i n° •aerc of m • i band himself does stet , es in every mbar inseam' of (totem., . CbarlAtht Wrissl. si l l hart bete frarayara- r !"ag ear"' "Pasimi "it 'P 64 ' ; I come foreareaWeembe doe for the measure/ My , c The Lady ILltaabelle For m „ ' J s'ill • P.ari of Strailbrd.bass ha- two is it my purpose aearort to that right oaten driven I teamed Frier& as then er side, In order to ism rill of the • "The Hee. ininee 1 .e-lisr • . • to it by absolute ant oTer-ruling necessity. I am aloe i ren a reWb-stddicial pro. 1 Ina u . sidnirolnlybide the" Imd.reasoe to APPrehMle i ! Anthony lisdhsellip EsEL• .• • A . • use dlr's( to abstain on gllii otealiou ' rincipies_of Welke were 7 1/1° i 7 '' .1 h . ~___ for 1 •Poli•_. Me the ipso of sp WI luive, au doubt. en% w ar e .Moy pm , rout a.l 'Tomcats t. t e trey of reeriothfrou.. . r odur sbat ibe t we isery rtY to the Foment • - mile, lasi ••i•.. 4 •• t .1 etts wbich chailfes onevireVer iddhcretisin, or arilillaily..• lo# an - * ' INA mi. telibita epos- •.. • Tire Usil 43 's. . -I.' • "lad is f37lllr.atis illimie tsiaLo4 ity and mina, in , tereciiihe whiah low been broadest ford led l ="17.--moralmitl_ita Ms. sompjd . Rte* Otte We trope, , ; glee Earl M e g • ' %be tonne in 0 1intasi Alit QOM% itccosiiie% tp ob . 1 1_ 24 Ate a ate of her bow. bysslMMto was esat.)o rot aerie_ tpr ark ow ukir l y.• la:. xre • b s • a ssimen I 1 Nea tjl4lllo Cher mot wide% have Nosisisettillorifth sithilPiOli , cog hl ii • t ftwwieg was Mr -• ' • 'Woof *arse - o bee . _ _ _ , bee km b... j _ aii. gm `fora(, but wbich et a bro a, " ~ • warily ins isiiii, ,• ...); . 1 . • Vit'lit of "' al eln i A V I ..: hoit. " mit 1 ttl tie vOrtentdeler Into d'e . V lab ' I I li/el • . igithafilimilbillt .'ll*4 raw ROW* deep an a go- . 1 3 ! a W i 1 .400 . * lie _ t I aril as the admirable words "flf reen' 6ll2l2 " r Y arY"'"fms 1 9. 11111,1 • 0 1 10 0 414- . ' theesdenlint• lis .ISt .. ,rY pp ,'' . toed TyftliV:4l,4,l.l • Lordships. After stating n •in eed, postpone such argument until the last weasel stagp, sad that be ems ea ps a r agb, .. ! Leda' Writs **h. 1.. 3 • %.- •••-s • 4 . 4 • . • AO ; . , . • b • .. , • •••• • • •AV ---? - 1ria414•41•44. 4 ..4- • tim•••e • ' • ^ b00.% „._ 1...• • 4 4.....•••iiime• 4.1" ...- ..".-."•:411!.1•441,.....""''''."41.- 4- • • •'• ••-* ''• - •••''"881e •z•