The Statesman. — London, England, 1814-07-05 00:00:00

~ .~.: : - L•.., of her husband. He wished to presstucion the. House plied with the rules of the that no instrument of regular separation was ever tion of thy Pgl l c drawn up between the parties; no deed of that sort expressed( tyat e. ever would have been signed by her Royal Highness. three eoliths aft, itoy, Some time afterwards, when the income of the Prince should Wet b ` B was raised to 60,0001. she thought she had reason rosity of bis Royal flighi, for asking more, on the same principle that the in- thesrattcabinf-Walittkwere comes of the Royal Princes had been increased, which has been alluded' namely, the necessity of supporting their reeks and the part pf his Royal IL the advanced expense of the necessaries .of life.l.lle But his Royal Highness. concluded by staving that the supposedcase °Trait liable to the future debts debt, mentioned in the instrument, had not arrived: mightatany time base been that there seemed no ground for proposing.a,noddi• ,contracted by the pritrees, Bona! sum : at any rate the Princess had not authii...the trouble to give in their ... claims rised the present motion either directly qr,jnclk le stated time. it may be dr redly. •• aa .4 • F I -would not have beet; Lord CASTLEREAGH said he certainly. bad• Covery from the Prince' some observations to make in reply to the lion.. the PrinceSs of Wale", Gentleman, but he would reserve them till lie should sons were notoriously IL. propose his motion in the Committee. that her Royal Highness , Mr. ROSE saw no objection to going into the assigned for her sustenetv Committee. dependently ofall deeds The SI'KAKER observed, that the terms " con. of the wife could not recce sent" and " recommendation" had not, perhaps, of separation, they coup: been kept sufficiently distinct by the Noble Lord.— it was the peculiar siteatioi Recommendation certainly was most applicable to a at that .time, that for, the prospective Measure. actual creditorsobe flu Lord CAS I'LEREAGII-said he merely wished to from him the abilitfd it use the term of the largest significatiod,—recornmen- tering into any deed Whi dation in its fullest extent. It was thus that his lion The • House then resolved itself into a Committee. ! protection of the law mi Lord CASTLEREAGH then, rose, and spoke as and it was to this purpose follows :—lt is my wish, before I proceed further been presented to the into the subject, to correct some missapprehensions Majesty's signature aft as to the _nature and extent of the income of the the separation of the i Princess of Wales, which have gone abroad at va- separate maintenance, bi rious periods, but which do not vary the result.— i the separation de foci The Hon. Member (Mr. Whitbread) has repeated , lity, or rather impossi the statement made by an lion. Gentleman on a i of this separation thou! former eight (Mr. Methuen), that previous to the jesty was induced to year 1800 the income of the Princess, of Wales was deed of arrangement. 17,0001. besides 50001. for her privy purse, paid out, his Royal Highness had of the Exchequer. If lam correctly iutortned, .to pay the debts previous! lug my intelligence through the most authentic ehttn., with the assurance on t! eels, the Princess of Wales, previous to 1800, had 'eyed in the paper whit no fixed annual income, and that after that year in future cases, if any st 12,0001. were allowed. While her Royal Highness f *Mined to seek protectit continued to reside at Carlton-house, her fixed in -1 the nature of the regulat' come was only 50001. allowed by Act of Parliament, ; be unnecessary for me to her other expellees being paid out of the General the Bill itself shall be sul Fund for Domestic Charges, as the bills of the ,of Parlialyieitt. It will Prince of Wales. ft is en tirely a mistake to sup- ": Royal Highness under pose, that upon any occas i on l spoke of a formal the Parliament has the' deed of separation : that which amounted to the of Wales, because in. fin same thing was signed in 1800, which first establish. curred by her Royal ed a fixed income for the Princess of Wales. It is i ference of Parliament. not the fact that the Princess of Wales was al.; sure I shall propose is, lowed 22,0001. before she quitted Carlton-house, from the payment of an but it is true, that on leaving it 12,0001. a-year was bt s potitricted by the Nu granted, not as any deduction, but as a new arrant ! Highness will now have ment, and a fixed income. I must repeat, what I chaiged on the Consolidated said upon a former night, that considering the ex- ) pine that the net annua, isling circumstances of his Royal Highness; this al-Ito the Princess of Wule! lowauce was as liberal, or more liberal than any in- ! annum, and the 17,001)1 dividuel so situated would hare given : it exceeded present enjoys, be wit one (varier of his whole income. I sill not. now ' gent's income. his Lola enter • into any arguments respecting extravagancies i : wag the general outline on either side ; hut on the part of the Prince of ; propose, concluded by Wales, I do maintain that' he acted in this engage- 6 4 That it is the opinion rated with the same liberality that has ever marked ; annual sum of 50,0001. his conduct towards the Princess of Wales. He' lidated Fund of Great took upon himself, in 1809, the payment of 49,0001. Wales." • the debts of his wife, who lived in separation, and Mr. WHITBREAD rather than allow her creditors to suffer, he put him- as to the past income of self to great personal inconvenience. With respect observed that she was to the amount of the debts of the Princess of Wales, ment created by the Act the Honourable Member and the House will see, was not a party. He col that if the sum of 49,0001. paid in 180 Q, be divided better than by an accot Into annual income between that date and the sepa- : ments which had been mi ration in 1800, it will appear that the actual income Prince of Wales's debt of the Princess of Wales was more than 22,0001.' Wales came to this co! per annum. This was exclusive of the sums paid the Prince of Wales in out of the Droits of Admiralty, amounting to splendour due to his stag 32,0001. and 60001. The actual reduction, how. rangement for the par ever, of the Prince of Wales's income, from 1800 made before her arrival. to 1809, was 2 . ,0001. per annum. It now came to . this country, it was foul the question, what addition it was fit to make to the Highness could confine, revenue of the Princess. of Wales, and what sum it dignity in which radial was expedient for Parliament to grant ? At the have been maintained. time the arrangement was made in 1809, it was in-' of the establishments, tended to be flea' and binding upon the parties who sarily shared, which aft( treated, as in a state of absolute and conivlete sepa. could not have expected. ration. However conclusive it might he upon them, were.however at that time it does not, however, preclude Parliament from in- paid into her hands or no terfering to enable the Princess of Wales to maintain was legally due to her as an establishment more suited to her station in the vested in the hands of law country. The measure, which under all the eircnm-; Thorlow... In 1 7 97 the stances I think most desirable, is to raise the income on, .and here he should of the Princess of Wales to that point to which it tion Tao so pinch dwelt would be raised in the event of the demise of the tlereser)7 Did he Meal Prince Regent ; for without euteling into legal de.; on such a term, or to tails as to the nature of the separation, is is waiver- from the enjoyment of sally known to be as complete in fact as any septum- ' Roy - el Highness was no , tion which can take place between two persons. As, t nor did he agree nisi the therefore, the Princess of Wales cannot be in the ! on theta M el imointed enjoyment of those adva n t ages w hi c h,. if b o th th ese th e Chancellor` hiresidi illustrious persons lived together, she would receive, doubts, whether fay Wits and as it is not within the province of Parliament to have a legal effect. *4l investigate the causes of these differences, per con- had been limited to 11,0001 sistent with the interest or dignity of the Royal Fa-,, it Was a great act of gene roily that any question respecting thei r diffe ren ce s tome. But it was jest-to should be entertained in this llouse--[flear, Princess lift Carlton Ararl]—it seems consistent with justice that her , ferniture, plate, house- Royal Highness should he placed in the same si- which were giien to her Nation, pending this separation, iii which she . some knives and forks. would stand in the event of another calamity..• By , seem any great act of gent the proposition which I shall submit to the Corn- was increased. It wool/ mittee, the income of her Royal Highness will allowance•of 12,0001. a thus be raised to a net amount of 50,0001. per an- of the Prince of Wales ' aura, 'Fite manner in which. I wish to propose this ness, when by an applit income to be payable, is, that the whole charge of the 2th of December, 1, it should rest ou the Consolidated Fund, instead of ley, her Royal Highnes s , being in part issued from the income of the Prince a separation, a house in t Regent, and in part from the Exchequer, as is the besides the 50001. settled case at present; and that the public shall be indetn- eves, when the separaC nified to the amount of the sum which is at present the extent 9f the Allowance . paid to the Princess of Wales, out of the income of and yet surprise weseaprelied the Prince ltegent. As to the nature of the arrange- been contracted;antipaid. meat formerly matte between the Piittee of Wales of Wales, to the STROUIV and the Princess, the object was, that his Royal the relinquishmeet of a Highness should not be, subsequetally to the signing was studiously. related. of that paper, liable to the debts contracted .by the reagh.)--That was thol Prineein. It hi trite that it was only by the genevo- W.'s) mind at the time. slay of his 'Royal Highness that the creditors of the this part of the question Princess had any claim; for as they had not coo- Highness from the imputai . . ra's THE STAI ESM %N.. ... • . - ........_ .. . . he law enacted.for theregula-% frail theld , Of. ; :bei ling enteitentod any . ;• - • the Princes's debts were paid, !though he did i • • ' . - :ictftt.eikk . t . • - .ratifying t . , 4 ..r. , .i It know when that would be, or hat the debt, 1 el! •; -; : ' I x"' ',ht, thin; th w `l 'i..;' . n of the 1 T . 4 1., ) 'a tiltr .. As to the appearance of the rincess on the ; i, ~. • Oie ited hex ‘h . " t •. • :e. She hs ' i . ss- . oksgiving Day, he did not ask t Noble Lord . .6 1 . wrieth • loth gins's. wHii 'the alldwa - ' h , she had p. .". s ~r,'• '. . work impossibilities, but it was \ease ne oj e t h at J ahness, that the creditors of any disposition to have it increased, until she had when the House of Commons had Tot .to the Prin. ] sere i n d e ot et t_r ar alm4yosget,Jitnowai the r istostiaLibe. Uotilikai,,„tiajp4figea l .,,tio c.eas of Wales so large a sum as 50,1 s . e.yearohat [ to , and not to any want on suth. intention; was entertainedlifinyontrwbo - fa ate should be pr e s en t a t a so l emn i ty '. which thd ' ugliness of legal pr ote Not, .... tiAthed tikgisaliemeat-. on lid of her: Royal Royal Family, Peeresses, Lords aq. Klioaa4l . 1 s was not secure against. being Highness_ t end he Mr. c ould distinctly state , were to be present . He di d . not ex, et. ny reconc i a „ 1 . A .. . - lebts of the prince* al he - 1M the Priheesi ha . nevers k aurttorTtri•hy Itie, dt. liattistr, but ieweret4 - be-pteursWfts ... , .* ,:: . been o b liged to,pa • y.iinit debt ,; reit* or indirectly, la-make-any proposition an.the ..the.twoßaayat Perfoners togetheL ant he earnesttt .1 !eas y if-her creditorajutd taken subject of increasing her *OM 111100;t4, arrange- hoped, that the rank of the, Princess.. teoqld ~ be rsO , eir claim/110 the Prince withinfaient:ef 1809. a... . -:. sewed, on ; that. t occasiors * . lowassse ) 411kti sr ile s: i be doubted r - indeed, Whether' Lerd,CASTLEßFAGliohaerfitCtithPthotlerile' large a vote week' , savour of a, bribe si a un a p t . 1 a *sufficient liar to. the *re / . ngement, which was considered final,: had been Oise. _Be WaVpitsitsded that the!NoblO Lblifiktall i e' of all. deitacontreeted by 'made respectingithe - Printoof Walestedebta,. yet as niean no such insult, .and thet:the Prime Relight was that the'iiiiir illustrious per- they had been contracted,• it was neoesaery for them incapably( it. . The Proclainattpoceire ,ed that in a state et, separation, and ,in some Limiest° be peid, -. i lia ° f ord C.l WO .no,t all personi shiiidAo4ele t )ittleit,pti : ; ah A lind est had a seperate tilowsece -mentioned 'beam 0f...p0001.•f0r the hooseit'Gteen-' l .,thet.sush as 4114 n 1501C.Ail. i . •,. : it, H op i lance. If in such emi-ei'ln ! "wicfrotharlhg been paid Olt of; the. prince or ykes's l'Higimewiaaa ispiessurce .Watsti . • -vials tilt' • Is of separation, the, reditors...lncome-4Sbed in'fact lieeii-patd out of the Di - WO( i (P rincess to do ?—Was she tikh e r Wit' . . ' from t .ecover a • fortiori with a deed .Admiralty: But 60001i.svai paid out of • the Pried/ CailiediiiChnia l i a ,- ißSoper ,4 0 e ;y 4,it t k a t If not have any. claim, .. But ''or Wailets'g-income; . beiiig,The 'balance left 0 tumid .00, p'thei iiineepnw . with ther-Priere, Wahl phial 'WWI 'don of the Prince of Wales those debts intended to: hare - been paid out. of, B01'1(41)104 Mt libt'Ro)rat Elighttesi.. . - 7! he purpose of justice to his .Dtoits of the Admiralty,. but which wereOhly paid ; Mr. WHITBREAD.—I again.dinvlides.whvg . W , Ferliament had taken away from that fund to the amount. of '32,00m. it the beteilimeteted:by' -the Noble Lord--4havirienity :hist incurring debts, and from en- amount of the debts of. the Princess paid by the been . my motive in bringing forward ttissediscoesieat hich might affect his Lucerne. Prince,, had been addedfo her inceme, it %timid have I again peremptorily deny --- I Wit in contempt* Loyal Highness- required the amounted to an income of 2 2 ,0001. per annum, with i tion to obtain fur the Princess Of Wales josh li note than ally other subject, a remainder of 60001. The Princess also had never i had it in Contediplation tia trtittiblihercyattl hod lt„ Ise that the paper which his been at the entire expence of her places of residence, ! in. contemplatio n s to' obtainthe.' pa-41444 pe tiller- louse was drawn up, And his - for places of residence, with considerable outfit, had : House, and that. prOteetion•harbessobtailseiT lied, not only as a proof of hien assigned to her by his Majesty. Though he did j Member roc Wool re' AMi.,11444400; *IN, illustrious parties, and the. not intend to found any argument on the statement ' I mentioned the proposition of a vote on a .ter.. but that 'there was not only lie had made, yet he thought it just that the Prince nislit, disclaimed ititanitlidritY:fratitiint Piirieess a to, but such an improbabi- Regent should have full er t editfor. the exertions-which ; Vt. ales. It must he, 'save all her. rights, sire her : . sihility, that a termination he had made for the, Princess. . ljte repeated t hat , state and dignity, th a t s h e con d escen d s to rece i ve ild take place, that his Ma- never any husband had surrendered up so much for'a i arty mheey fretit'' this 'Ouse. 'When first she heard o lend his sanction to the wife as his Royal Highnees had done ; and thetlikato';iol the proposition, she said; " 1 shall not be al. From motives of delicacy, ever was the cause or reiplk of the,separatioA t it'h,,a okoidd for fti,v6 •In 'this .country—f shall not be lat the same time' undertaken never been bis intention to tit the Princess with any-10614yd abeg My ti*Ad—and I will not compromhe sly contracted by the Princess, , peenidary inchaveniefice: .. 0 . ' nir • Ins for any . ebsUg . which can be o ff ere d t o me .",, the part of his Majesty,-con. '' Mi. wittraitto4served in explanation . , thit 1 Whit . tie Slid ; ii4CePts, it must be in th e con t em pt * . ich has been mentioned, that between t 6 'and 4 1741001.! had been paid for the Prin. ?than .t at she Ores up nothing of rack, of dignity, such occurred, he should he cent ' but of the Dreits: of the Aditairtilty y , end; Het ' ulna char:toter, Whieht, by the grant of this sepatabs. ion from Parliament. As to 32.0001. which was thaamount.of all the debts in-. 1 and inlOple- 7 -too. ample allpwence, it is evident she aliens of the measure, it will tesnktl to have heed. so paid. . • 1 beide is the eyes of all th e nat i on . It i s i n coo . ;o detail them. minutely, until Mr. TittWEY observed on the real effect Of the i temiphitibri Whether her Royal 'Highnes s shall be ad. ' ulintitted to the' consideration separosiuss-- thus it was one winch- had mites 'from mittnd within that Cathedral, where all of highe r , not be advilable ti place her an ilea:m*olll7 of tempers, and np furthers. Sorry ~ rank are to be admitted. if an - ap pli cat i on ma d e these* diaebtliff In which :. as he Was ' ih* t it • rousted to this extene r he 'on her behalf were refused, how woatld the natititx;• ought fit to place the Prince should dOetinet ail further comment.—[flear, hear 1 brook this indignity ?...-*lf there be one found to ad-. Id no debt has been lately in- —He gave thanks to' the Noble Lord for what' he ' vise a denial—and if it be• intended riot only to es.;• ighoess to .call for the inter- had achieved, to which all he had done before was elude her Royal Highness from the Drawingaroes4 . --' Another object of the melt- •as nothineto this:reOommeodation to Parliament for from matters of ceremony, but from saying her I to protect the Regent , tills allowance of 0,001. a year to the Princess of - prayers with Ate nation—what a mere mockery will ray debts which may in .future . Wales. - The effect of thiti'measure would be speedily the Proclamation of the Prince and our Resolutions' incess of Wales, as her Royal . foil:Ol t And on a day eihaa our feelings would be in be, if, when we pray for forgiveness of our tres- e a distiiict separatelderime : unison . wish such a happy &feat t be meant on the passes as we forgive others, there is one person shut dated Fund. t 1 w6h.to pro- - Thanksgiving-day. Pe thel procession on that occa. out—not from forgiveness Only,, but from justice.— al sum of 50' a 6001.1fograiired sion he hoped and trusted the Princess would find aAs to Has provision which is to bh made by this v o t e , • es, and that the 6000 r. per ; place ; not so near to the Prince as she might have it : ii hurt,—much larger than any of the friends of )I. per annum, which. She at been under other circhmstances, but as far off as the' her-Roy:I Highness could have contemplated, if any thheld from the Prince Re- case•would permit. [A.laugh.] lie again thanked . 1104 .iffitil had 'Ontered their minds. It is for her to • rdship having stated that this I thel Noble• Lord for what he had done, and hoped he tonshier, 'Whether she thinks proper to accept the: aof the measure' he should . would he atsorsoccessfal in bringing about the etetit : whole of IF I bite no doubt that she will act with • proposing this Resolution— 'to which he (Mr. Tierney) had alluded.— [ La tin'!) -- i•dignitY ark propriety ; and if the calls in *defiers - el . • i of the Committee that -the : He (Mr. Tierney), if he had been one of the edeisers the subj.?, I hope she will call in such as wilt soap., he- paid out of the Conso- of her - o:cyal *Highness, should give her his opleion port her in her own honourable ideas. I Britain to the Pridcess of tbsjit would not be advisable for her to burthen the; Mr. PANNING said, that as he had not i bseir; • i *obi itifth so large a sum as the 50,0001. a year ' present at the former discussions, he rose to iniihresi.. I rose to set the Ilviuse right :lour offered Act her. But supposing so large a sum I his concurrence and entire satisfaction is theitote • P the Princess of Wales, and is have been accepted,- what was to become of the . proposed, the rather, because the House an that day' not guilty of the embarrass- remainder Of• the • 60,0001. paid to the Regent as , followed op the manifestation of their sentialew me tof Parliameptto Which she , Prince is sWates t when the 17,0001. was deducted ? , a former occasion by a measure not to be mistake" :ould not illoorate.the matter i This .60;0001. had been granted to the Prince of by the parties, both from which it originated, or lunt of the various *arrange- : • Wales for the joint lives of himself and his Majesty. , , witia`which it was connected. Lie should :have of- nade for the payment of the : Thil was given in the contemplation that the Civil 7 feted nothing further, if he lad not heard setae its. Before the Princess of I List, would never be enjoyed by the -Prince of , deibiretietts . ; that the Princess Obeid act unworthily ountry, she expected to find' Mates before the death of his . Majesty, . ; 'His : to - accept the present grant.—[The whole of it, from the full enjoyment of the Majesty, it was true, still survived, whether happily i Mt. Tierneyl—As• the House .had preserved One Ltion, as the second final ar- .oe unhappily he scarce .could say,: and the fPrllcel prlnnipre in t6e . diaeoliions on this subject, not to yment of his debts had been I Regent received the 60,0001. voted for the • support : ntridriinia those things in which it could not properly . Shortly after her arrival in of his dignlty•of Prince of Wiles, While !tires uct.,! come to a decision, so on the other hand, her Rpy4 md impossible that his Royal . ing in the name and on thebehalf of hii StajestYnad ; Highnesi should not revise the deCi.vien of the Com- ie his establishments in the surrounded by his State. Why . was not then this' niittee, but that considering that all ber cbilets were Lment had expected them to 60,0001.. taken away ? It was said that it enil sp. rtaken into consideration, and that Al refusing a In the consequent reductions propriated to pay. his debts, but.it wee an inconsist- l part of the grant she would lie open to the itepute. - the Princess . of Wales ueces- cow) , that the Parliament should pass in Act to say 1 tin of giving up some pecuniary advantage to in, ter two final ariangenients she that the Prince of Wales should hav e on), Ow, and once more the subject of discussions in Poriannput, . . i. Seventeen thousand pounds then immediately allow him to pay them with this ' itwould• be most proper for her to acquiesce passkey me set aside for her, whether 60,0001. a year, without taking any notice of the in the determination of titt Houle. ....... not, besides the 50001. which matter. Why then should a fresh ' charge be made ' The Resolution was agreed to----the How liras re. is pin-Money, and which was on the Consolidated Fund? Why could not 50,0001. sumed, and the Report was ordered to be brut Lon) Cliohnondeley and Lord of this 694101, be transferred from the name of the up to. morrow.. . e separation was .determined Prince of Wales to that of the Princess? The real . Mr. BROG DEN brought up the Report of , d ask, Why the term separa- operation of the measure, as at present proposed, Committee of Supply, which was agreed 'to, ot :on by`the Noble Lord- (Cas- would he, that the Prince of Wales would burthen Bills ordered poraoant,to the Resolutions. in t 6 foetid any legal measure the country, while . . the Princess would bear the, • Ordered, en.the motion of Mr. BA NKIN, that a prevent her Royal Highness odium. If any incumbrance remained to be paid (in return should he made to the House, stating the man. , any of her just rights ? Her whatever mysterious terms they were wrapt up), uer hi which the alleged sum of 10,0001. hild been • party to use of this word, why s wefe they not paid directly and above. board, eepended for the improvement of the two 'UMW'S of lie parer which-lied been laid and not suffered in such a way to continue as to pre- Parliament, with the uames of those under view I .to a deed of separation.— vent the Prince Regent from appearing as the Sere- orders such improvements jeere.elelfle, 1111(1 such ee. If hid eapretied the gravest • reign of a great country should 'appear? He re- penditure incurred. . : • • . sten - Mint of separation coul d petite(' that he hoped the Princess of Wales would . Mr: BROGDEN brought op sre Report of tire Irheit de • Princeas .of *ales not accept the whole of the -.proffered income of Committee of Ways and Means, the Resolutiens of 0001. a Year, it was said that . SOON. but if she did,. be thought she should - not . which were agreed to after a few words from Massa. nerosity to increase her allow- : bear the odium of an tecretised charge on the country. &likes and Parnell. to fentember that when the I Lord CASTLEREAPH disclaimed any credit to . • IRISH PEACE. RILL. Eons,' she bad to plosiide her ! himself for the proposition Which lie badmade. Mdre On the motion of Mr. Pt ELK the House resolved orent--for the only sulkies . credit was duel to the !'honourable Gentleman whom into a Conimittee upon *the Bill for preserving the or from Carlton . Houle, were be did not see in his 'place (Mr. Methtten) . ; for, if „Peace in Ireland ; and the Right Hon. Gentleman. s. It would not, therefore, ! the advocates of the Princess had -before fairly said : moved a clause, stating the allowances which he pro- ' generosity that this allowance! that art increase of, allowance was the object; there .posed to be granted to the Superintendent Magistrate, old be seen how moderate this I would have been no difficulty on the subject. Isk ; Special Constables, and Clerks to be appointed to a year, to which the necessity t answer to what had fallen from. a Right Honourable : act under the:Mill. • • I had reduced her Royal High- ! Gentleman (Mr. Tierney). he shodld -say, that :they Sir F. FLOOD spoke against the provisions of the :cation made on his behalf on last opportunity on which he-.should endeavour to . Bill', while he bore testimony to the zeal and activity 1797, by Lord Cholmonde- bridg together parties who felt mutual reveries*, 1,..0L the author of it, and that of the Goverment ass was offered in the event of would be on an occasion when the. devotipii.iiiiield . with which he was connected. His Right Hon. n town with 20,0001.; a year, alothe interrupted' in such a manner. As terthe In- I Priind an the Irish'Government 'wits ln bis judg- ed en , her:, Air oot1 4 „ bow- come formerly , granted to the Prince . Of YakietOt :Mint Optitled to the highest praise for their males • lion took place i. 4 1 9091. %ilia had been applied.since the time of the regolakion : tours preserve the- peace of Ireland; end especi- once to her WO iligheess,, - Which fi rst tOok place , after the Regenty l . to the li, ' illy 'in suppressing that obnoxioui institution the presied that a'slebtshoeld . beve l quldatioiP Of thidebts of the Prince Regent: . .Since Gatholic Hoard. But while he acknowledged this dootoitti . oncomeOftliePrince, that time the li qu id a ti on h a d p roc e e d e d ; no t one merit, he deprecated any attempt to cast an un- it of which the OA, pair! fog, ,new debt had been charged on t h at fund, and it was ! putatienupon the general tranquillity and loyalty o f L !muse kt,Prempvi h Pork; the intention of the ' P rince Regent that no' new 1 the Irish nation, to which be was sorry to under- .e'et/tro, _trims. Xyr . :t rat, debts shetild be charged on it; and s when the pre- i stand that Great Britain was not • generalty partial. -, i k i b,bapressioopeide go e l ( i l . sent debts were liquidated ) it would: revert to the ,-.[Expressions of disiriprOo s ei,j---That four.fifths of a. All thakwatatutcssum on country., -.. , • Ireland was as loyal and tranquil as any part , of . ii was, to relieve her Royal Mr. TIERVitY said, he . wal satisfied, now he England, he was fully prepared to assert, and there 4 nation of extravagance s sod t understood that the fund in questiou existed only fore lee disapproved of any intimation to the COc• . . • i :