The Statesman. — London, England, 1821-06-04 00:00:00

Priv - • , . rer VW.. .W.. . -• ZS , 4. : .;a .. * , .. . , •-• . . -.., Z\lA \ . k•.- . ..,..„, ~,,,,., Tar ezutan4 1 , Nif ` ..1 : . L..... 0511Eng49741. KY ONDAY, JUNE 4, 1821. .31 -1, 'A . LONDON, 5090. " The Cann for which HAMPDEN jiff i■ Field, and SYDNEY died Gs the Scaffold!" - PRICE SEVEN PENCF. ILIGYPTIAN TOMB.—This Extraordinary EX HIBITION will continue OPEN every day from II till IL Admission One Shilling. MAW ARGYLE ROOMS.—Mrs. has 1M the honour to announce that her CONCERT for the BENRFIT of her numerous FAMILY will take place os THURSDAY, the 7th of June. The following (Mlles Performershave kindly proffered their assistance :—Maffaste Casporesse, Mrs. Salmon, Signora Cord, Miss H.,Corri, and bliss Stephens; Signori Tong rariooi Paolo de Begrex. and Ambrogettl. Fantasia Grand Piano-forte, Miss Thompson, (Pupil to Mr. Ries.) Solo Harp. Mr. v Hoist. Leader of the Band, Ilignorßpanolettl.—Mrs. CO HAM basing the misforMise to lad a Professor's Co announced in opposition to that she 'sheered so long to raise, to aid in the the support of her Children, is unlaced.; with the most lively anxiety, to submit her perilous sitsatiois to the humanity of a Britsb Public, humbly hoping they I will not suffer the unremitting exertions of a Widow to want that support the unfortunate Geer experience from the Nobility and Gentry of England.' *than which she would find it impossible to answer the expenses of her Concert, much less provide for those Children dependant on her exertions.—Tickets Ios. 6d. each. II be had at the Argyle Rooms ; at all the principal Music Shops ; sad of Mrs. Cob ham. No. IL Seymour place North, Esenso-square. IRELAND. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DUBLIN, MAY 25, ISM. MR GLOVER'S of OIL and WATER COLOUR PAINTINGS is NOW OPEN at 16, Old Bond-street. Admission Is. Catafogies 6d. CALLA C. 111 4 NAMARA. . The argument on the motion made by defendant's Counsel, to set aside the verdict obtained in this case,' was resumed this morning. Mr. HOLWELL WA Lan a rote, and spoke nearly as follows : EXHIBITION of WARD'S ORAND NATIONAL ALLEUORY, in Commemoration of the Tamura of the Barrtstr Enna?, at the Battle of Waterloo. Painted by order of the British Institution ; Size 113 feet by 41, h NOW OPEN, at the Epptian Hall, Piccadilly. Admittance Is. Catalogue 6d. Description do. With 'utilised outline 24. 6d. 110FLANI)'S Exhibition of his Picture of fticifitlOND, from Twickenham Park." with a v ied*. *oath other Works, is OPEN at No. 108, New Soad-stre ionet. Ad misr One Shilling.—Catalogues gratis. Mr. HOVLAND, who ha- -ontrihuted nearly forty Mitres tke last ten years to the Exhibitions of the Royal ca d e my, having learned from a Member of the Council, that it wag doubtful whether the single Picture be had sent f a r the present exhibition, would be hung up, as account of j u in', site. has been induced to withdraw it aliagelbr, a are this mode of tubmitting it to public opinion. To isE, FREEMEN OF THE CITY OF YORK, RESIDENT IN LONDON AND ITS VICINITY. "TIME favour of the COMPANY of the YORK I FREEMEN Is requested by Mr. Wes'''. and Mr. tirdoner to supper, at line Albion Tavern, Aldersgato ;Vest, on Saturday, Juno 9. e.,* Tickets to be had at the Albion Tavern, on Wednes day, Thursday, and Friday next, irons ten to eight o'clock. -- - PIANO FORTES and PEDAL HARP good asl new.—A Pedal Harp, late the property of a lady. cost TS guineas, for 43 guineas. Capital t'abinet Piano Forte, N ot to heequalled in touch and tone, usual p rice 00 guineas, fur SO guineas. A square Piano Forte, 93 guineas. Grand sit Octave Piano Porte. cost HMI. for 7b guineas. Also may be seem the much admired Oblique Piano Forte. equal to say of double its price in tone and eauty. T o be seen only at Mr. Watlen's. 13, Leicester-pla b ce. N. B. Usual al lowance to the profession. • 6 - 1 1 U KG EON -DEN T I ST. — ‘ l r. A. C LARK, late 17 Assistant to Mr. Young, Ilariey-street, acknowledges y ith gratitude the favours which he has hitherto experienced from the Nobility. Gentry, and Public at large. With de ference Mr. C. solicits their attention to his superior method of fixing ARTIFICIAL TEETH, a method which he fear lessly asserts is equal to any. and superior to most. at pre 'sent reed. Mr. C. takes the liberty of apprising those who have had the misfortune of losing their Palate, that he has succeeded in inventing an Artificial One upon a construction entirely new. It might appear vanity in Mr. C. to state the highly flattering manner in which it was considered by the first Medical Gentlemen in London and Edinburgh when submitted to their inspection. Mr. C.'s Artificial Palates. as wail as Teeth, possess flits superior advantage. that they ran be removed and replaced by the wearer at pleasure. — Hours of consultation from aloe to four, No. 78, Lower Grosvenor-street, Grosvenor-square. - - NO FIXED PRIZES !!!--3,00t I'rizes, including TWO PRIZES 1110.300 Must all be drawn 14th This Month. (Jtine.l Every Chance bought between 2Stlt Mny and 14th June will he decided 14th June. NO FIXED PRIZES !—NO CLASSES ! rvety Ticket drawn singly, each deciding its own fate and - - • onor-r -,-- Tens other. The Tleiteta see lasited In Chances of Tickets. Halves. Quarters. Eighths and hiisteentliw, which are now selling by J. end J. SIV EW RIG I IT, the Cuntrartor., 37. Co robin ; 11, Holborn ; and 314, 118)m:trial; and by his Agents in the country. J. and J. KIVEWRIOHT sold In the Drawing which took place the Stith ult., No. LOU, a Prize of /4,1 1 UU, and several minor f7spitils. And several t 21,000 and .tVO.O OO Prizes In the last four months, 1011 N BURGESS and SON, bring apprized of the numerons endeavour?' made by many persons to impose spurious article for their make, feel it incumbent upon them to reuest th attention of the Public in purchasing what they c on ceive e to be the original. to observe the name and the address corresponds with the above :—the general appearance of the spurious descriptions will deceive the unguarded. and for their detection. J. H. and Sox submit the following cautions: —some are in appearance at first sight " The Genuine." but without anv name or address : some " HoncESS'S Essence of Anchovies:"--others, " Bea- Gi's"—attd many more without address. JOHN BURGESS & SON having been many years ho noured with such distinguished approbation, feel every sen timent of respect towards the Public. and earnestly solicit t'sem to inspect the Labels previous to purchasing what they conceive to be of their make, which they hope will prevent many disappointments. HOW ESS'S NEW N t Uri:, for general purposes,baving civets such great iiatisfnetion, continues to he prepared by them, and is recommended as a most useful and coovenient t,:mce. Will keep good in nil climates. Warehouse, 101. STR t. n. eornor of the Savoy-steps. London Com ORIGIN .11. YISII-S,ll*(*lt WARIMOVSIR.) A MOST IMPORT INT DISCOVERY. FOR CONVUL SION AND EPILEPTIC FITS. SPASMS. ac. DR. HADLEY'S CONVULSION POWDER, a certain Remedy for Convulsion Fits in Children, aad L! all Spasmodic Complaints. These Powders area never (Ailing remedy in the worst eases of Convnlsions in Chil dren, or Adults; also Epileptic or Falling Fits, which they completely extirpate ; removes the most violent Spasmodic . Affections. These Powders ar e wonderfully effective even m Consumption. and in nll cases of relaxation, debility. and weakness in Children and %dulls, and restores the Patient to perfect health, without confinement or alteration in diet. These Powders are equally efficacious in all Climates. ERTRACTS FROM I.E.vrEns DORF:CUM TO DR. HADLET. From the lion. Sirs. Egerton. DR. DADLRV. Tattoo Park. Sept.?. MO. this this morning received y our letter mentioning your intention of bringing y..ur Convulsion Powder into more general notice. I have so very high an opinion of it. from lilt. cases I have seen performed. Unit I think you will be doing a public service.-1 remain, Sir, your's. &e. R. EORSTON. MOM FROM TAR RIGHT 110%. LAD LIISMOR. Sept. , This is to certify. that I have used Or. adley's Convuls 'Powders in my family and man y others. and approve of ion its n e a rn ess Limnos E. t-Meacy. 'now LA PT wat.rout. Mt. HADLEY. II iltinido n. Uxbridge. Jan. VG, ISIO. Sir-1 shad have great piessure in desiring you to make u , e of my name when vnu publish the Convulsion Powder. I'S Brent ellicaey in my owa family and friends, and to the P . 4 ” .. I hare esperienced f ur many years.—l am. Sir. your Bumble servant. CATHItRINS WALPOI-11, Sold in bottles at 4s. W. I Is. and *ls. each. by appoint mfat °film Proprietor. by Mr. Sanger. Medicine t,Y arebouse. t IA (Word-street; Messrs. P arcla y and Suns. 93. Flee Nlarket ; Messrs. Nesr herry and Sons, 43. St. Paill's Church tand ; Edwards. CO. St. Patti's Church-yard : Sutton and Co. 11.,w Church., aril ; Rutter. I. t'licapside; Evans. Long-lane. Prout. Stratitl ; Stritilins an 3 r Nlas Roy al Arming,; Johnstone. Cornhill; Ward. N ' and weir appointment by most respectable Medieine Venders in o‘vry Tom a throughout Cle far Pr. II au lAA 'a Cunt W.: ion ria dera. 1 its ea. IPP I 4W e woe •• atMod °( eqesill arise to Dot Pre ese. be t e a Aill --- I POWs typh- yettje cts he tro ll " of treat idler. 46 eteegioes tr able ia in of Pr nil. eve. ba * dy rves' - cl‘ingY he eoes tih r frequently From 194 ratio; the :ed orpittl. Sqltr "r" i trealf ;41eirtoi 5°11,7 , r d.stres - •• See- l'he ri•si'ret3l4. b e etftw get +../:x Rio! ci t v 0. uor regir's FROM SATURD4rB LONDON GAZETTE. CROWN OFFICE, Jcwa Mat/PER ermasED to SERVO IN TO'S PROEM PAR• Borough of St. Ives.—Sir Christopher Ilawkins,wf Tre withen in the county of Cornwell. Bart. in the room of James Robert George Grahams, Esq. who has accepted the Chiltern Hundreds. Commission in the Royal South Gloucester Militia. signed by the Lord Lieutenant of the county and city of Olosices ter, sod of the county and city of Bristol. David Newman, Gest, to be Ensign. Commissions in the King's Own Staffordshire Militia, signed by the Vice-Lieutenant of the county of Stafford. The !tight Hon. Charles Thomas Clietwynd Talbot. com monly called Viscount Ingestre, to be Csplaitt. Vice Talbot. resigned. Ensign William Booth to be Lieutenant, vice Whateley, resigned. RANEIWPICIES SUPERSEDE! ) . R. Park. jun. Portsea. coal-merchant. W. Ry de, Cannon-street, grocer. BANKRUPTS. E. Burrows, Warsnr. miller, to surren.ler Jane 11. 13, July 14. at the Swan Inn, Mansfield. Attorneys, Messrs. Ball and Brownloy . New Burnell-court, Carry-street; and Mr.Walkden, 11ausfield. J. Etches, Bury fit. Edmonds. halscrdaslicr. June 7. S, July 14, at the Angel Inn. Bury St. Edmund's. Attorneys, Mr. Leech, Bury St. Edmonds ; and Messrs. Bromley, Gray's-I nn-square. Woftimlin and W. Elliott. New Mallon. York. corn factors, June IL 15, July 14. at the White Horse Inn. N Melton. .Attorneys, Mr. Ilk!.'. Gray 's-len-sqrare ; and Mr. Walker, Nlaltou. J. Pilling. Huddersfield. currier. June 27. 15, July Is, at the Peck-Horse Inn, Huddersfield. t ttoraeys. 'Messrs. Stevenson. Holittlirth ; anti Mr. Bettye. Iltantery-lages 11. Wheatley, Cot entry. silk-dyer, June 14, 15, July 14. at the King's Head Inn. Coventry. Attorneys, Aleuts. Long and Atisteu, ray's lan; and Messrs. Troughton aid Lea, Coventry. J. Hardwick. Clare-street. Clare-market. butcher. June 5, Ili, July 14, at Guildhall. Attorneys, Messrs. Richardson, Walbrook. It. Park, jun. Portses, real-nitwit:lnt. Jane 0. 23. July 14, at tinildltall. Attorneys. Mr. Briggs, Lincoln's- Inn-6elds : and Mr. Callawir... Portsmouth. T. Meet,. Ware. Hertford. saiii-oneker. June 5, lA, July 14. at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Bond. Ware. W. Hancock, Flury St. F.drnoisd's, cabinet-maker. June 5. 7. Judy 14. et the Greyhound Inn, Derr St. Edyend's. Attorneys. Mr. Way man, Bur) St . Ed mond's ; add "Alessi*. Blagrat e and Walter. Sy stiond's Inn. S. Robinson. Huddersfield. hosier. June 13. 14. Jnly 14. at the Session's-lions.% Wakefield. attorney +. Mr. Wigles. worth, Gray's Inn ; and dears. Cattle anti Tim's. Wake field. %A. Monk. High-street. St. Saviour's, Southwark, June 0. IS. July 14. at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. W ebb, Dean street, Southwark. T. Chertham. Stockport. surgeon. June IS. 20. July 14. at the IVarren Bulkeley Arms lan. Stro-kpurt. .Ittorney s. Mr. Tyler. Pump-court. Temple ; and Mr. Hermit. Stockport. N. KRViS. Gracechurch-street. tin-plate-worker. Jime 10. July IL at Guildhall. Attorney s. Messrs. Dawes mud Chatfield. Angel-court. Thrugmorton-street. J. Rumpus, Holborn. bookseller. June 9, 19. July 14. at Guildhall. Attorney. Mr. Telltale, Castle-street. Holborn. J. J. Battier. Mincing-lane. trot et-. June 8. 2`!. Jul) 14. at Guildhall. Attorneys, Messrs. Gait) and Cu. Angel court. Tnrugmorton-street. I'M PEN Mk. June 23, AV. Great M. Helens. broker--June a. IL li. Hilbers, St. Mary tie. merchant-Junt2.l. R. Diyon. Lamb's C o nduit-street, haberdasher -June *S. W. Mistier. Aldersgate-strect, wholesale jeneller-June 23. J. Wolin. Camberwell. tit-bottler-June 13. J. Ritchie, Woolwich. baker -July 11, W. Brock and 11. Le Nle-otrier, Waritford court.Turogutorion-str,et.itiercitant3-July 3. F.H.Christin, J. C. Clarke. and C. llom ea. College-hill. merchants-June 21, T. A liter. late of Presbury. Gloucestershire, innkeeper- June 3tl. W. E.gie, late of Kuswarp. Yorkshire, corn merchant -.lone 15, A. and J. Sorters. It. Burden, and J. llntiolling, Remick-upon-Tweed. bankers--June 27. N. .tbralsani an I Danie 3. when% 'lse 1). Let Bath. jewellers- June.:7. It. Tolson. jueo. 1)41ton. Yorkshire, manufacturenter-- June •33. It. H. Sorrell. Ki r by-street. Hatton-garden. prir -June 27, J. T. Koster. Liverpool. merchaut-July 3. J. I. Keithly, London. merchant -June 5, 11. Barton, Paul's Cray. Kent, miller-June 29, W. Kerby. Margate, coach inaker-J une .13. W. Keats. WiNtioogate-street, hosier - June 22. R. Braddock. Port wood wityin Brinnington. Cheshire. cottowspiniter --June 15. W. Dana. Dolton. upholder-Jute -23. J. Gray. Bishopsgate-street-wititeet. grocer-June 43, 'V. and It. Tweed. Cningfurd Mills,l'hing ford. Essex. millers--June 25, H. Hewlett. -Kettering. Northamptonshire. draper-June 25. T. Motto" Bristol. leather factor-- June 24. S. Lovelock. Bristof. baker- June 4 6. 11. Mills, New Bond-street. Burn-draper-June I. Pat art, late of Louden street, Feuchurch-street , merchant. CtITIIICATIIS—JCNE 23. 0. Rlehnntann, M ecklenburEh-4quot re. nierehant--. 1 . Blackbsivi. floir.lem. Staffordsoire. grocer—J. Edwards. Vine-street. Spitalffelds. silkiness- -4i. (iledston. %with 111)11t, Northumberland, butcher--a. Kollinson, late of West Worinetitarn. Suffolk. miller—R. W. Fox. Iblymouth. merehant—W. Dorrington. Town M ailin g . Kest. collar maker—O. WB. Tong. /Cast-India Chambers. Lesclenhirehal street, ship-owner—T. Bstroery. Warwmk. grazier—lt SiIIOWS, late of . Suffolk, grocer—J. Taylor. of the Park. in Shefll•lii, ronfoiender— 4. Grubb, High-street. Southwark. oiltuan—E. Leeson, Wo.m..streea. ribbon manufacturer —J. M. UM, Plymouth Dock, linen draper. P tRTNISRIIIIIIT% rotsgot.ten. C. Johnson and J. How, Hitch-street, Shoreditelt, Wier' —U. and J. llswlesford. and T. Morris, Willlogsworth Or chard Colliery, Sdiff odshire, coal-enasters—W Foole and M. BOwley. Longhborongh, Leicestershire. milliners—F.. Smith. J. an4J. Ellis, C. Smith, James France and C. F. lows, Datiey -Carr, Yorkshire. tar p Cardwell Cardwell and John Smith, Union 11141, Waqt-apoo-Dadled. Yorkshire. lee k finx-gpi!rs-11. Pass and W. Ku-tter. Oxford, *pother-tries —W. Wend J. hheslden. Dissents-AV. W ig atom awl W. llorsley, Derby, plumbers add '4 ,3AL-ft . —l. 'Phillips. 'r. Ilxv:ltta.. and L. L. Lee. OM liond-street. mu 'sic-sellers --J. Fish& and W. Napkins. -..4... -j,t,,,,„tr,0. Clerketsvrell. tallow:etkanillets--11. Parry. and J. Step:teas, :Ctmoge-alley . 'Mt • • -•- ram, E. Umluau. and I -tun"' 1 , 3. tint wltutttilig t.or tu tweet drat there teas, siiil this: went. My Lord—ln this case lam Counsel for the plain tiff, and shall endeavour as much as possible, to con dense those observations, which I may think it neces sary to lay before the Court, in reply to Mr. Wonlfe, who went se minutely into the merits of the several counts laid in the declaration, and so ably argued on the several exceptions made by defendant's Counsel. The first thing that I have to observe, my Lords, it, that various as the forms may ht• in which these counts are put, they are all grounded on the one consideration —namely, a mutual promise to marry; and if there was any one point more fully laid before the Jury this another, It was; wb,tleer there was evidence, not that there was Miaow, but whether there was evidence adduced sufficient to satisfy the minds of the Jury, as to the promise being mutual.— Counsel fur the defendant contended that the promise was given for the consideration of future, or past illicit cohabitation, and that as such it was immo ral and illegal. But what i= the evidence of the pro mise itself, whit* I shall r..:111 to your Lordships. --a (Pere Mr. Walshe read the promise). Upon that paper, my Lords, there is nu evidence of any consider ation whatever, it brass date 20th October, It ; Yet this promise is stated to have been made for the consi deration of future illicit cohabitation. T!iedefenilaot never saw my unfortunate client 11.0;1 I 11. Ile was introduced to her at lice own house by a Lady, and was not always admitted when he cane. This prom'Ae Was not given at the commencement of their acquaint ance on the contrary, there is express evidence iu the terms of the instrument itself, that it was given I three years and a half after their acquaintance hail aotinuenceil. Look at the circumstances under ohich that promise was given. Look to the time when th;.t promise was given, when they were mutually parting from each other, when the defendant was settieil out for Ireland in consegnence of the transfer of the Tower Hamlets Militia; and here, my Cords, give Inc leave to observe, that it is never for a short time that a re giment is removed from one country to another. The defendant was going to Ireland to retorts to the plain tiff, he knew not when, if ever ; but wh-: was the pro mise given ?--f Ilt ! Mr. Woclfe has said, that it was for the consideration of future illicit cohabitation : loot what assi;nable reason, what earthly motive could they have, if this was the consideration, thus to make a record of their own shame ?—And what was the co soical, the very liish matinee in which that arrange ment Nags 114.1411*?—Why it was this, they entered into a written engagemeot—" We promise to live and co habit together," and they followed it up ; how by the Gentleman setting out fur Ireland, there to re main rt haps for ever, whilst the Lady remained &i -mitate' in her ono house in Lon Ion: What was the evidenco of Caroline Exton ? She stated, that the promise was given in the year 1%15, when the defend ant was about setting out for Ireland. She stated, that the plaintiff evinced mu h anxiety at the ilep afore ut the defendant, amid that he gave her the written pro mise, as lie lied himself s.iid, "to put her out of the power of fretting, amid it. show her that lie meant to Instil al his engagetne.its to her." .I.re we to presume that an insured woos is ft--;ings, under sick e iream. stances, should go for nothing ? Is there any tribu nal competent to call that Jury to account, and to tell them they did not take them into consideration ? Can we for a moment suppose this woman Wien so low as to imagine, that she wool I prefer an illicit cols 'bite thin with the defend int, to that honourable contact iim whirls he had himself volittitarily pronsiae.l. lint All. iVoitlfe has Axil', that she was fretting for his .1.-par• lure ; if so, why did hr say that lie gave her the pro. mite to put her out of the power of fretting, for he was then departing ? Hit was a mere girlish feel ing of sorrow at her lover's parting from her, host could he by giiing her that promise put her out of the power of fretting, when he was, even at that m .mrnt, going to another conotry If the promise was given under the consideration of future illicit cohabitation, then would the defendant, even as her paramour, be adding insult to injury. But tis the language of this promise ? Does it not amount to this We may not meet for year'. but when we do, you are my wife!" It has been stated, tout the pisintillf and defendant hail Iwo, living in illicit cohabitation for three years and a half before this p.ornise of marriage was given, but there is no evidence of this ; look to the facts of the case— the defendant was absent for fourteen months : when he dial return, be was bedridden three or five months, and upon his recovery, he set out immediately f r Ireland, so that the three years and a half illicit in tercourse am wits to three or five months when he was bedridden. And how has Mr. Wuulfr felt this tlitfrulty, and endeavoured to get out of it, when he talk' of a cothishinage of letters ? I leave this to Mr. North, who is to follow on the same side to explain. Perhaps Mr. Wculle was arguing on the authority of Pope, that— '. Ileav'n Snit tanstht Letters for some wretch's that, Home hanisli'd lover, or some captive maid ; They live. they speak, they breathe what love inspires, Warm from the soul, and faithful to its tires." Lord .NIOKIII:BY observed, that the passion if Eloise and Abelard was every where recognised ; the Port had made Eloisa say, that a letter could ‘• The Virprin's wish, without her fears. impart, Excuse the bluish. and pour out all the•heert. Speed the soft teleran:ewe treat soul to soul, And waft a sigh front lulus to the Pole." gr. Wat.;ine resumed.—But assuming for a mo ment that there was evidence of both considerations, insanely, past and futureillieit tohabitation, I- do not idnsit that there was eviileure of such censielerations meld net shut out from the charge of the Learned J•dge, the evidence of the Intelsat promise to marry at a future period. The Chief Justice, who charged the Jury in that action, was applied to by Counsel for the defendant, to charge the Jury in a particular manner, but his Lordship then most justly observed, that be did not think the case so circumstanced as that be could take it from their determination. Lord NORSURT-4 recollect that case perfectly well, the learned gentleman engaged for the defend ant would have charged the Judge, and have let him charge the Jury accordingly, so that every charge they " let off" at the Judge, he was bound to " fire off the same charge" at the Jury. Mr. WALSIIK.—My Lords, if the Jury believed that a mutual promise was the consideration, then is the verdict not to be disturbed. Mr. Woulfe hes said that there were no impediments to their marry ing, and has asked, why did they not marry forthwith. Mr. Woulfe bas also favoured us with a most edifying discourse on the unsanetifiell state of concubinage, is which the plaintiff and defendant lived, and has most evangelically enlarged upon the adulterous intercourse of letters. Mr. Woulfe has said that there were no . impediments to their then marrying, but, my Lords,it appeared in evidence that the lady bad & jointure which would have been endangered by a matrimonial connexion with the defendant: I scarcely seed allude. my Lords, to the utter destitution of the defendant 'as to pecuniary circumstances; there was sufficient evidence of the plaintiff's having supplied defendant with money at different times ; in one letter there was an enclosure of two pounds. (Judge Johnson here observed, that " there was. enough on record to prove that.") The fourth eonnt, my Lords, is to marry on request, or pay 5011tIf. hut this is not variant ; on re.iee.t, must mean a future period. In the letter from plain tiff to defendant, dated " 19th !larch Int No. 32, l'pper lieorge's.street, Portman-square, L Indian," we have this remarkable parsage, tt do you mean to re main in Ireland i" Mc Lords, is this the evidence of future illicit intercourse In that letter she tells him that the Abisielity will shut him out of heaven if be deceives her ; hut " no," she says, " you have not so bad a heart." Yet in that ttttt rut, when all that is woman io her is rinsed to a sense of feeling and of s'iasse, when she calls on the Almighty God, and de• mounces heavenly vengeance on him if he deceives her, we are told that in that moment her wools to him are, " c ome over and continue to be my guilty paramour, anti I will be your harlot." That letter WWI commented upon with all the powers of ridicule is( whirls Mr. Heady was master. But, lily Lords. ie that action the proof adduced on the part of the olaiiitilf wis lar:t . er titan the statement of Counsel, a•id in the case of Montstevets v. Brook it has been decided, that where the statement exceeds the proof there is a variance, but where the proof exceeds the statement, there is not. Mr. W stAnn continued to eoftwee Ws scent" at considerable length, and with mush ability, and concluded by mentioning the case of Lowe v. Piers, which had been cited by Mr. Woulfe. In that C•I•1! Mr. Walshe stated that there was no promise to marry' at all, and contended that the verdict could not hate been disturbed had the contract been the same in tlia't ar ion as it was in the present rape. Mr. motel" , followed on the Ramp side, and made a powcrfal and elooliwort appeal to their Lordships in support of the verdict. Mr. Noe - re thee rose, and spoke nearly as follows; MY Lords—ln this case lam Counsel for the de fendant ; and shall en lavour to confine myself entire:e to the point at issue. The points of exception in this case a e few and easily intelliKible ; this case, my Lords, has not been fully tried. If contracts of this !.auroral kind were admitted, a man might contract with a woman to marry her at a future period, if s he should Homier her husband. Thus Philip might con tract with Mary, to marry her at some subseques4 period, provided she consented to live in adultery with him. But, iisy Lords, these contracts would he nullified from the wickedness and immorality of the considerations. The contract in the present case is silent upon the consideration, and if it is open to the plaintiff on the one hand, surely it is open to the de fendant on the other to give parole evidence, as to what that consideration might have been. Counsel for the plaintiff contended that the consideration was a mu-. teal prinnise, but the evidence has been totally va riant. A gentleman meets, in the streets of London, with an illiterate woman, represented as beautiful an .1 interesting, and after some time, we find them living together—no isles of matrimony, be sets out fur Ire land, and gives her this promise to keep her from fret; ting ; hut this is no evidence of a mutual promisee—. Was not the state in which they had lived for nearly four years previous to that trial, some evidence of OW immoral consideration in the coutract. The words of that contract are, " I will not cohabit with any other woman ;" does not this imply that he will cohabit with her 1 It amounts to this—l will cohabit with you, and you alone, and when we are satiated with each other, we will then marry. He (the defendant) then went to Ireland. and a correspondence commenced : he writes her word that he saw a cottage in whi .b they could live happily together, but still there is net a word of ina.riage. lie returns, and they continued living as before. Their separation is preceded and f kiloa ed by illicit connexion, and matrimony is pest paned to an indefinite period. It has been contended that there was nothing o.: the face of that contract to 'thew that the consideration was of an immoral *am e; but it should be re.collected, that persons entering into illegal or immoral contracts, do net speak oat; bat purposely .throw a veil over their wor ds. I con tend, my Lo rds, that there is not more evidence to rt the consideration in this contract was for a mnt , :if ',make, than that it was fur the future illicit intec course of the parties. 31r. :Noah continued to argue at oeufh (noes - length. The Court fitaaily *m* withoa‘givispitnlp. ‘l . 1 a T ts iy re NI is las ry- tir im ost rse O 4 are nial ear. lan nut taut lest, • i . • ' we n re- re of him he not tio.tt • I NI! Of .1 ao. • 0 di 'ad le Ifd• V ; try Auk met, . the *ell t, *ad I d lb. i WO ion $ it Kim D pills !An' ) Care q ; so ig. bl nil ° s 00* 0006