The Statesman. — London, England, 1814-04-19 00:00:00

0 1 ! 4.1 rarity is left in human professiem..___The • Princes will riot pass without tiniffhefol jealousies must embitter the domestic relatf6ns oollfe.' On this subject, however, I shall not conjointly', • havisigdedicated a letter to it in another publication. shall,. therefore, confine myself here to the crates. deratiun Of other matters. The ancient soccessiou of the Crown of France went upon this ground, : that tin' best right was derived from the people.— . PHIS CHARLEMAGNE waspreferred to his nephews, . against the right of lineal succession; and Louis 1. be ing deposed, CD A RIAD LE CHAUTE, his fourth son, was • • admitted to the prejudice of his elder brothers; as •' W3l Louti.ll. to the prejudice of hie elder brethren; • and his bastards to the prejudice of his lawful sons; CI:ARLEI IV. to the prejudice of Louis V. and Oiuo, Earl of Pat is, to the prejudice of CHARLES I.V. liurit CAPE-r, the descendant of OTHO, " came to the Crown," says BELTOREST, 64 by the consent amid will of the Commonwealth." Lib. iii. c. I. • And I find in a scarce book, entitled A Treatise of the Broken Succession of the Grown, of England, published in the time of the Centmonwealt4 . 1653, p. 80, the speech delivered •by the AniP bassadors sent by the States Or 'France to • thrAitcy of LORR3INE, informing him of theie election of II;:ou CarET, which I shall give the, Reader; it is taken from GERARD ; end DOLEMAN, in his famous book, published in the latter end of the reign of Eme urn, from which Mr. PLoweest has made sudlt abutidattt extracts in his Jura An glurum, has, the very same speech, p. 140 , edition .1681, the Orst editiottof that work having been pub "• lisited.ls93.--e 4 E.,erysoaninoweth(Lord CHARLES) - that the inceession of the crown and Realm of reasee l accoraingio the ordipary lows and rights of Abe same, tilongethuito you, and not onto Ikon curer, now our King ; but yet the v s exi m ame laws ! which do give unto you this right ,Of "on do judge you also unworthy of the same.;. for that , you ▪ leave not endeavoured hitherto to frame your life and • manners according to tin prescript of the said laws ; . nor according to the tittiond anstoui of the country of France,: but rather hare allied youreetf with the • German action, our old enemies, and have acquaint , ' . eti yourself . with their_ vile and base n•attilers. ' Wherefore seeing that you have abandoned and. forsaken the ancient virtue, sweetness, and amity . of The French, 'We bate also abandoned and left you Mel • s h ore chosen H ucu CAPET for our 4 King, and have, past you back; and this withobt • ! ally scruple or prejudices of our consciences at all ; •. esteeming it far better and more just to live under MOH CAM, th4l present possessor of the Crown, • NA enjoying the 'ancient use of our law . , tustoins,l pririleges, andillterties, than under you, the inheritor by nearness of bloodOn oppression, strange customs, 44dt:rocky. For even as those that'ase to make a voyage in a ship open a dangerous, sea, do not to much regard whether the pilot who is to guide the j . • *fern be owner of the ship or no, but rather whether . he be skilful, valiant,' and like to biing them in salty to their way's end, of-to drown them among , •the waves; *trivia so out principal-care is, that we have a good Prince to lead and guide us in the way . of s civil and politic life, which is • the end ashy •Pritices were appointed, and for that thirties is fitter 4s) lie our King." Thus did - livon Carol 'come to ire Keg uf Frawce, thotit, by the tame right that the Kite:s of England govern to this day, which I. Fawn:secs atilt-pole:las populo ejtuxu. The people ' abuts hint tweet* they deemed flit& to .be their' King," -then CHARLES of LORRATNE, who paid no regard to their ancient laws, customs, and liberties:. Such was the origin of that right claimed by the llonse of CArrr ; and the Reader will plainly see that, at. the very best, it never was better than that of Bo- NA PARTE, who held by the very same tenure; but having been forfeited over and over agaia, as by XI. for instance, who tyrannically subverted! .Manse ancient leis, customs, liberties, &c, 'which] Mean CAPET (under whom he claimed not withstand., it'll) was selected to maintain ; as irso by Louis XVI. who broke his oath to the nation, it is very clear that the title of BONAPARTE was far better than that of the BOURBONS. My opinion, therefore, is, that the Decree'of the Conservative Senate - could not have lawfully divested BONAPARTE of his right, if he had not pleased to divest himself; and it is k great happiness that he has done so, as by that means i a civil war is avoided. And now, as to the case of ' the Itouenosis, there are but two ways by which they can reign ; either by a restoration of their an civil family right,' which indeed deserves very little tespect, the tenure by which they held it, namely, maietenance of the ancient laws and liberties, tli-g beint lest and done away with, &c. &c. or • i'resh authority derived from the people. But ....tits••rvative Sea ' to are not competent to the • ! .s•-‘311. , 1 ; this new authority in the Princes. . themselves have only a rkricatirc •... .d that power must be exercised for ..11)o.es for which it was entrusted to them : anilterity is cthiservative nut creative, and it is un abtertlity to say, that any man (or body of men) tan transmit to another a right that is not previ ously in himself. The people, indeed, may finally approve what the Senate may previously dig est and propose to them, which was the mode of Legisla tion practised among the Saxons and 'other Ger Man nations. This may be done; but stilt' It" will be. ne. l cessary teat a National Assembly shotird be expresily (Wed for this purpose, as was the' case in the Con vention Parliament. As to the ProjelrOf a Constitu- 1 tints, for it deserves no other nenre,.digested by the Conservative Senate, and published in your Paper of Tarirsday last, I confess that there la.it considerable affinity between it, and the Constitution of 17'89; but 1 do not think that this is any proof of the Allies itti, become proselites to the Rights of Man; it is witty me rather creason for suspecting their sincerity. this circumstance, however, bears you out in the • assertion, that the principles which gate the first im puke to the Revolution of 1789, are effectively at vterk in the Revolution of 1811. This assertion •ented to me incredible till I read your• Paper of last Thursday-, and now I confess that there is an p<••:, mice for whit you say. But, however 'specious e,e,. appearances may be, I cannot believe, for My p 111, that it is the real object of the Allies to este- Cash, in 1814, what in the year 1791 they ma • ts .I.rated together to destroy: On this subject, how e;, I shall enlarge in my next, and remain, &c. 1. maXingielusebire, Apiill6. l.: ~~, Ineteatat7 . *.ittutulre, O r 'ery , Abtfal opiiiio:ll. OM' . t 4, object), the ;Plldhtiff titter was regal ed to ti upon himself the adralolsteatioa.before'he*li ,f4 i canunuoicated' fat. the refusal ; • he tra only guyed to appear and show mune, so that , 440'1' never iit:Contempt. 1` .. posoirety of 't:" , O . r. n pli Y ii n n o ti t t ;lir tfiii hemp r at m f u •.. ' 1.- • AY' Ads a I litii I.he COURT Gr CIiaNCERY, Astau4llo, This tlarthe Lord Chancellor be 1411.11 grit Seat before Lister . Term., ~, • . ,PRITCHAED V. LEAKS. etL Ann ~_ , .il in contempt. • .., , .. . . . Mr. /TART nt h hesio, thht the Ittjunc. , granted in I I: ,. % 4VENSC this case, which weiftto restrain the Defendant from Mr. ABBOTT, for the Defendants, said, 4 shoeld , c i l t!, ° W ; ( not contend that the sentence bf excoinmuttic :on I • „ h .-4 ,iN DI L s t . 11111 proceeding at law upon a Poet ' Obit bond which hack I was right ; bet the lattei 'pe 'rt of the or al! _IS in acti been granted by therlaintiff to the Defendant, should ~ !. citation -cited the Plaiatiff - tdhippear and take ltd- i I ' M "' J ' l l i i ktiir'' be dissolved, unless cause were shown before the ris- the ship City of . ministration. • h ing of the Court to-day. 1 ' Lord Ehhewaherategan.—The offence ie espies's , Malifis to Eogland, efence suffered h Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY said, the circumstances d • stated to bithilsot Appearing in ordine ad.r, awl 0;6 . d , • t - h• uh ,_ , h e 'this case were exactly similar to those of the case of tar the Sheriff, tence Is a nitl f lity. His Lordship then ohsejied, : ' rim - '"'' • hi.'"4, .. -t ib Pritchard and Kent which had beets disposed of by that the declaration charged both the Defender* to '' aati " ,a,k ia , a the_ .- &maces sh :and ... the: his Lordship about a fortnight ago, and it could . have committed the wrongs inuliclous/N. hardly be expected that his Lordship would make a e ns bierught toe heel-lug , principal is not liable for the individual malice eonda ries. Office, different order its this case from. that which he had agent ; the Plaintiff must therefore either Amid i tt, heth and • . . made in the one alluded to. There his Lordship had. • a hpecial,Jury. h charge of malice against th e agent, or against continued the Injunction till the bearing of the cau se, . Defeudants. . " . e Jury,. with hie usual .. - te •. the Plaintiff in the mean time paying the arrears of , psa id , there i it . , Mr. ARK interest due, and as it should become due, and also .• 111fieftt, was made ' against either. paying into Courtalie sum in the hood, when the pe.. evidence having been I ' h ale. Assort' then submitted, that face al up P o U n a th i e n .i O L f th .ebe • D'eh4felf ': l " r " t t i s ie l' P l ia ' i viol of payment should arrive. These flame terms the , thet Foceedings it did not appear that the Defendant, Plaintiff was here ready to comply with.. . ,haalensade: apiost one only. I OrhParkinsen, was answerable at all. I very : clear and diSC. The LORD CHANCELLOR oldeeed, that on these a verdict for the Plain) 'Lord Es.hzesoirouor observed , that the schedule ' 1 terms the Injunction should be continued . r. , of excbmmunication was charged to. be transmitted ; a MURRAY V. MURRAY. by the Defendants to the Bishop of Bath and Wells: To nix EDITO.' A bill had been filed in this case on **part of ,it would be a point very fi t for the consideration of Colonel Murray, son of the late General Murray, the Court hereafter, whither the Plaintiff, 'having, No . 18, neva.' against Mrs. Ann Murray, his mother, t s h_ late Sir hjejoed the Defendantse mod stated them ' jointly to SlR,—Yqu will James Pulteney, Mr. Donaldson, and . have committed certain weerega,could afterwards peeve Piper a copy . dtth well, the executors and trustees of the let He might have charged the Vicar- this, day to Mr. Lai - rat Murray, calling on them to account foe certain Gen i al', with proceeding through the agency of hi, tee of-the Stock large sums which had 'been paid by the trustees to • easiorate.iftappeared thit theV leer-Genera I presided from althiterson .* Mrs. Murray, &ring the minority of the. Plaintiff,:'. at theUrt Court. ' ' - • ! collect' Tam info' over and above the sums to which she was entitled Alt-. Aanorr submitted, that the words before the intendon'ofprOpoil under the will of the testator, and an order had Defendant Parkinson, dtc. were merely the style of for his informatioc been made ba , the Lord Chancellor, restraining the th e Court, arid did not necessarily import, that he was having asserted, '' 'Defendant, Mr.. Murray, from receiving any part, present: and it was stated, that the Surrogate Vicar. persons of great of an annuity which, by agreement betneeu her and General decreed, &c. . ; connected with the the Plaintiff, ahosit sir months after his coming of., Lord FALENBOIttir:C:II said h he should have listened fited above 50,0001 age, it had beets settled should be paid to her, in Ito the Learned Cousts:el's objection / if there had been ' which took place lieu of Ail other elalete.apOrs the property of her any person before named to whom the word " sur-'f It is thy intent deceated. husband, -eta . sack 'aceount swell be rogate" would apply :. but the Vicar-General was ire- public to come forwe taken. ' fore alone spokes Of ; and t o e requisition afterwards by Mr. Macrae, wt 'Mr. LEACU now brought this order under the • was to appear before the said Thomas Parkinson h ur ceive the reward me view of his Lordship :by way of re e heeriug, colt- his surrogate. • ' the parties. tending, that the order Ought to be discharged, go- I Mr. Amsorr then addressed, and contended, that I am, Sir big, as it did, in a mein which it was by no thatas, 'if the Judge of the Court had jurisdiction of the clear, that the Plaintiff had• any relief or claim subect:matter, though ht ' s sentence might he reversed whatever against the Defendant, to deprive her, in, as erroneous, no action at law against him would lie. /ROM MR . COCURANE JOHNSTONE TO MR. CHA RM the mean time, of every thingijse bad to depend up- : The sentence bias certainly erroneous, because no day LAUIIENCE, CHAIRMAN OP THE COMMITTEE Or Tit On for her subsistence, except, indeed, the trifling' was assigned on which the Plaintiff was to - take the STOCK EXCHANGE. pension of 601. a year, h to which she was entitled as : administration, and probably because the Court had " No. 18, Great Cumberland-street, lssh April, 1514, the widow of au officer of rank. no right to compel him to •do so. " Sin,--I have to request that you will be se Mr. Roves:Le followed on the same side . . . h i ve the D e. good as to info r m me, what are the intentions of the „ Sir Saneht. ItolithreT nr 1 the gued in support o 's - a Lord ELLENBOROCGII said, he would motion ror a • entient, leave to argue these ha points on Stock Exchange on the subject of the letter whi c h I order, hs inch the risintiff was entitled to bola, 'if ' nonsuit ; and would at prese nt assume, ttlhe ac- addressed to you, relative to the. proposal of Id s . it bias not meant that Ise should be precluded. from ; d on was maintainable, thel proceedings being. cer-llacralh 'all right of calling for an account of the management htahnly,•irregular. The Erclesiaitical Courts were I . " Lord Cochrane, Mr. Bolt, and myself, 'itt :of his affair s while lot aas ass infant. Thee question '' arme d with no other compulsory DrOCFSB than that of *thing to subscribe one theasead pounds each, it 'teas not here, whethee MI'S. Murray should.have Ito . excosnin uaica don a Mut his Liaid ie r i , iiis aware w a s a ; nitl'of the ten' thousand pounds required by Mr. Ma. fund foi her ,suppert, -, for she had the fortAlted ; great hardship l and thihalsterhised if ander a perilous Brae. 'Tile bearer waits your aeawer, which, he house belonging tar time testator in Hertford-street, , resposisibility.- -a• 'I i : . - • .• , ; prevent any mistaket I hope you will b a d tine it Mai fair , which she let to the Earl of .Clotsraelt tor 1 'Mr. ABBOTT then confined himself to the ridestioti , commit to writing. . • tiobi .• a year, but whatjtel. tits Plaintiff was .te-bil of d i miagei : _th e y pains, of excommunication Stever' " I eta Si,,our obedient servant,. ~s . I s T left without any proaissieufrom his father's estate, hew , over the Plaintiff; for the schedule weft hewer (Signed) "A. COCIIILILNE JOU S'STONE. 4 t The Lotto Cahweehtoix id, he should look lists • reacriu The parish church, foity davi after which, 'the &Bit:wits, and give hire llama on 7fhirreday.' _ . -IROS %grit. 1814. ' l ' i - •.- Jo. upon a diirififeanif to The Genet of Chancerh,, „, a h w , r i t h " Sie,—l .4e_livered'yourtiOter to Mr. Cinder , • . • -- " 4 ""r"-.. ." . ':144."...."".4..-)akf. ' 41.4414 * .4111 P' fli e r b e' e 'b t '' 4 " d' s th " s ' iuin tr " I.wmc° . f 'teepee Chairman Of, the Sub-Committee of tire Collar tar lt [NG'S nENfalt, Aran IR. :.:" it would have been competent to the Ileitis ifr ta have . 4 , 1 Stockaichangth this alay,iMonelioy, and received London atUalirlard Sittings aftei• #filai:y Term. opposed-there, or be might have moved to quash it , , i th e following verbal answer:—" Give my cervices ACKCRLEY, =Q. V. IPARKtN6O, D. D. AND MAWDS - l in the Court of' King's Bench, where it is return aute, lisi Mr. Johnstone, and tell him, that it is not from , LEY, CLERK. !upon the ground of the nullity of the sentence.- 41 any unpolite mistive I do not write an answer, but I This was an action brinight by a Barrister, resid- had been contended by Mr. Park that the affirmation I ita desired not to commit pen 'to paper on any sos ing ut Bath, against the Vicar-General of the dio- of the Court. of Appeal, at. York, revised the sets. I ; count whatever. I will lay his letter before the cese of Chester and his Siartegsekt, for excommuni- ; tence. 'Phis Mr. Abbott denied ; but if it did, that , Committee when they meet, and they will comma-. eating the Plaintiff. It appeared, that the Plaintiff's was the act of others, and not of the Defendants. I nicate to Messrs. Hichins and Fearn, his Stock. father having died intestate at 'Chester, the Plaintiff:. The Plaintiff was. all this while contumacious. The brokers who will let Mr. Johnstone know the' refused to take out administration of 'hit:estate and': question of hhe nullity of the sentence was never )reau it ' .—i o,r, . asps, as your obedient servant, • effects, and was sued by'ceriain persons having an.; brought before the mind of tteCoothatt York, where I ( ..h aeh am ) • " JAS. Milt& interest in the estate, as well in the Court of Chester ; a, common lawyer presided; 'eta When it was before 1 44 - Tio the Hon.ll. Cochrane Johnftose." es in the Court of Chancery, upon a bill filed against the Delegates theeserrtence was reversed, as well on i ,- . . ......----- - him for an alleged intermeddling with such estate. ! accoanhof theithsofficieueyof interest in theflespond. The Plaintiff was cited in the Court of Chester for ; ents, as on the gramme' id the Appellasat ,not being not appearing, and was pronounced contumacious ; l compellable to administer; and the Court did not and on the 29th of December, 1807, sentenced to.:give the Appellantcosts. The appeal to the Delegates the pains of the greater escommettication. The ;eras on account of the error of the court of York, ksser excommunication excludes a party only from : and were the Defendants to assn cr for the errors of the communion of ti. , : , s!ss; rah : the grader incapaci- others? . ••: fates him from being a juryman, a witness, from ; coOr ro A . U'litallOßOL:G II charged the Jury, that the suing at law or in equity, and upon a writ de extom- Plaintiff had by the soil sentence of the Defendants ' ADVICE. monied() capiendo being awarded, to imprisonment been placed in a situation from uhich he could not 1 luu HEN Men of Education and Professional in any of his Majesty's gaets till reconciled to the b e re li eve d w i t h out i ncurr i ng a ll th e ex p ence f or , V 7 Skill, use persevering endeavours to discover the most church. The Plaisitiffnppealed against this sentence which he now sought reoaration in damages. It was safe and certain method of treating a few psevailing Disemes t to the Cunsistorial Court of the Archbishop of York, • necessary for him to appeal to the Court at York for s l u e suce nsfid•rconit of their experience is the lest proof of perior ity. which confirmed the sentence of the Court of the a b so l ut i on f rom t h e sentence o f excommun i ca ti on ; I Messrs. GOSS and CO. Surgeons, bava beta indacad to mate Bishoprick of Chesteh; and thence to the Hightoart but with such absolution, he did riot obtain an abso- i the core of . the . f . olla tier winc . the elect of th f e:r d reticular study of of Delegates, consisting of three of his'llejesty's lute discharge from the original citation and suit, ' Tutzt e a= " and s it r % conm r ‘m e lt u i e ta ll i t s:A . ;ric ril tu e rts ani n th t le m et o s, n w hick s Justices and four or live Doctors of Civil Lew, who which he ought to have obtained. If the Court of by an improved plan, are speedily and effectually cured; maim reversed the sentence of excommunication on the 7th York had put him in stain quo, had completely re- . h ' resid e nce w he i t r il m eir c i lim is a i l:e fre o l e il i a t 111(4: t h e a t n c a o ti li a t i ar i lud v itecc t es, ,o in of j one, 1811, holding, as the law certainly is, that ; lewd him, he needed not have one further : a suitor : unWt e ppily pursued by the t hey of hot setri4 y ip the one caw* there was no obligation upon any man to administer : h war not bound ha tell the Court it was in error : it in sterility or barrenness; and in the otheg a. . 'Macrae. traits to an intestate's estate. ' *is rather Me de, to receive thelaw from the Court. : ' . i iinpote l O n i tl e s i I) remedied. terminate So ai l i s ir c 4 e i s solaTm bi lfi l l i On i . f (I fn i I th in at e dist Mine of debili- Mr. Pane stated, that the fi rst question which Thb Plaintiff --.. , would he raised was, whether this` lion could be !costs of appea . to the Delegates. _lt was true, that if' hits, or nrit,ing from any other these. by which the powers of maintained at all, of which, after the late case-of! the writ de exconr. cap. had beets issued, the Court . t g h e e or. c s o 4 Ti f t . i n o n i t r ii h t ef ie o y m o e_ea er feetilesi. as _ regularly educated Sar a' ft arta, ate. an a l speedy restoration Beaurain U. Sir William Scott (3 Cam 1 Phe-ls 388 )/ ;of 'King's Bench would have relieved the Plainti ff ha ;to sound alas vigorous health. . which had been acquiesced in, there could be no I one second : but who was to sue the writ ?' N ot the ; b T a he mi r p e e , r u i lt ,r ot nl ' o r :ma:1 c ? extensive ir p e r n i rrei l l ( t ' 1 • 11 . 7 . epnlAribilliedts them l • doubt ; and the second question would be, 'whether , , Plaintiff against himself. rvlalice was not imputed ; ' ter inveterate or complicated, without int:Oen: n ig the 'intim% ' if the action. could ever be maintained, it could its I 'but the Plaintiff was seven months under a sentence to the least restraint id diet or exercise; and in recent. Catiette.,!' This case, where the Court had a clear jurisdiction, of excommunication not published. where an early ;:pplication is mole on di,covery of she infeetiosh • they frequently prrforto a cure is the , port space of two days, ' however they might have mistaken the law. As to The Jury gave the Plaintiff, 2641. 13s. 11d. The unprecrdeoted successor their mode of tre:ttment (which ball. this question, Mr. Park contended, that they had Dever been known to fail in one single instance in a practice et not a jurisdiction to compel a' man to take upon HALL V. RICHMOND. 'fifteen years, daring which period many thousand persons aim& Sexes hare been owed, even after severe and iojeVious inethortt himself the o ffi ce of Administrator.—Upon the sob- This war an issue from the Court of' Chancery, to had been pursued by other Practitioners without effect), induces ject of damages, it was admitted, that the Plaintiff's try , whether - the Defendant, at the time of his bank -1 them to thins publicly offer their advice. espeeces incurred befoae the appeal US, th e delegates roptcy, was indebted to the Plainiff a certain sum-of ; mews. Gess sine ea sexclusively professing the cure of these. • • . particular complaints. order dial they may not be tnarkedo wall 441. 14s. 11d. and in that appeal 1791. 19s. in money, received by him for his use. The Defend- iby a mistaken few, with the obloquy st. loFtly ntsached to the' RdailliOn to which the Jury would hive the Plaintiff and was a wharfinger, and in 1809 Plaintiff lodged a ignorant empiric, ninth it . hut jrliceta . themsetvett to stater that -such hempensation for the anxiety and reproach of, cootablereble quantity of hemp at his wharf,. amount- Li " e &e i v it e. „le e Zi„ i tt. l" (Ve r r i ti . fi r :„7:l a :ht ,` l,, ', V i d " i n iertrrs.,,it the exeonfm'unication as they should. think just ; the tog to 43 tons, 7 cwt. and t thrth-e--The hemp was tale, and testimonials from the most eminent • Physicians, theil schedule of exeottliatinicntiOn, though transmitted tb' t suthwed to remain at the wharf till June, 1811, at their r t e ssz e oe , v ,, i . or . e tin j o t t i s: L i reeerl, (betatha t the i flef t essLsulli t ttl i ltil . . ~,,. the Bishop of. Bath and Wells, in whose diocese the which, time Defendaet became 3111 bankrept. • On , the generalTractitioner, nod they pres o uir that their ;. net ts! Plaintiff resided, was never teed tit the PtaintOf's looisteg 'over Plaintiff's hemp at this time, it was slam censtituto a fair ground for the unprecedented confident* parish church, on account elf the immediate appeal found•that no more than hOhons, 13 cwt. renuthsed. , u w o i i t t h which they have, 'by the Public, been so Liberally h o . to the Court at York, and the Plaintiff was ab- For the value of the deficiency, Mr. Hall applied.to , Patients in tleitceuntre are requested to state the 'smoothes. ,solved'froas excommunication 'on the 26th 'of idly, the Cominisaioners for permission to prove his debt of their case, ( age. sad gestral habit of living, 'and iaclosing it' 1/4ifl. ~ . against the estate of the bankrupt. The Commis- remittance for Advice and Medicines, when the same will he. e ten owsent to nay pArt of the kingdom. ry tt - ' Lorti kl.czooticu said, there was no doubt 4 " ''... h isers bewever, would not permit him to prove, but - GOBB and Co. as/means, 13, avow r••-es Flee- sere . tit p et , , ~ but I.llllf tits sentence was a nullity and void ; for; UR the rentedyh.watelay actiese ~g yp :Mover, lot which i •, i ' - itkposing the Court had the power to eacommuni- liquidated damaeeS WpOirt not lip„ , .Von this refit. i ' ' lib I, • ' 14,- . • out ------,--- - ,,A-5-_,—._ i Wit, Oil !Pr il nod P.ublished by .D. I,ctratx., at l i t 1 r_yo . ' NA a diailor 7 0ot taking lettere ps edhlinistrh- sal ihe present action wee brought e• I Si itilltas A. OR" R, W I hleet-nreet. ... .. .. - _ , u ~ .. ~...ush: l'iY.;: - P • , ~ .. .. . d . DIED. On the.l2tb inst. at his house in Middlesex-place, London, Wm. Bligh Mouck, Esq. eldest son of the law John Mend, Esq. of Bath. On the 9th inst. at his honse,-Tanner-street, Faversham ' aged 72, Mr. John Stevens Minter, refiner of saltpetre at the Royal Powder Mills, at that place, who for 59 years served his coos try without a blemish. He was gunner at the garrison of Gib raltar daring the late ever memorable siege. • . Tkilf t FiATIEsmAN $ haw w c ll ta -1 " 11111 i a hou: e thiikh he kad he' frety'dOul If the hemp.havigt ‘ 4 , 44 rik . 41 • I being am/ 064 h% rill?" as if f. -- Daf4VilitsgStBl:l-fh Wog ; p de6=_ lro • • '- tliEßVlvsoflkT. • ► cac'E V, Pal At/ - .1 3 00.cgt14,.1e citt l wykootyp x At ton brOgh tor crnitinal inte r; •e: f's wife; commenced on f London, during the passig Pita and, and the Difendatte ntali l ud sz b y d e f au l t ,. alelb 'Uri, a Write( i Sheriff , * . a . .1111 11 1100 1 Jury se tbi*ltter was accoedu-u • . - VT snug on the lth Instant, at the*, , before tilt; tollingiii ad ry. extee West ex pleineet sual Serino( Be Plaintiff, atvOit apeech, no les t *: B by Mr. BROUGHAM, on behaV./ mitigation or damagev, _whe l p o w - been 'limited tip bYibe Sheriff l ie k isfinetmnnuet,4l*Jury brought i f . • Plaintiff of - JOCK: damages. ; • TOE or re s $714.17411.1141. -7•60.•-• Croberland-Mrter, April 1 8.1814. 11 oblige me, by inserting be yen he inclosed letter which I aides*. aurence, Chairnsilp of the Comiait. Exchange, with the letter to ipe wito•driivered it. From olitti mo pruned, that the Committee have ao itiog any recompence to MrAlactie )n, and which, I attribute to Ids " that' the disclosere will affect veriitecttbility end -fortune, much le Stock _Exchange, and who pro., 01. by the boas, suggested by thee, on the 21stlf t gebruary." (ion, therefore, to prevail oe the rward in aid of 'the sum required rho, be it recollected, is not to re.. !Wen he proves his charge spied ' . your obedient Servant, A. COCHRANE JOIINSTOIFIL '.ANE JOUNSTOME TO XS.. CHARLIE AIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE 01 Tit irt