The Statesman. — London, England, 1820-08-18 00:00:00

911 re.. E-. war I 111 a . or that he a 'tithed to subject her Ma e•ty to th , . da.i. ,r of suffering the penalties of that stature, a I.ieo e, re at variance with the humane spirit . the times. 'I hone penalties he won't( propose to r rad, aft* the pAtest evert bothe would give her t ajoety all The benefits of a trial under the Statute. t ; r of Ishielt would las, that she should have a list of teswitnease'• But rf, &Fee all, no proceeding was tend possible but that by Bill'of Pains and Penalties, e would then feel it his duty, however painful, to act jai' i dly.being firmly persuaded, that sul.stantial jt Mice would be done to all parties by their Lord ship-. Though be believed that their Lordahips were kthact:lnes mistaken in politics, yet he did not believe that they would ever refuse to do justice. He said thus much, as he did not wish to give any encourage trent to such charges as were made, believing that in I very case pure substantial justice would be achnini !treed at theit Lordships hands.—(Hear, hear).—flat if they proceeded without satisfying the doubt' which he felt, he would support the motion of his Noble Friend. The Lord CHANCFLI.OR said, that he felt an anxiety ta explain his notion of the law on the subject, and ebsTrved, that the Noble Lord furry) appeared to be a notch better lawyer himself than he was willing to tike Malt for. He had given his opinion before, that rite act, whether committed abroad with' a fo reigner, or with a foreigner at home, all the objections against constructive treason applied more forcibly to sechasese than to any other. Ile entertained con siderable doubt, whether the doctrine laid down by ire text writers was correct. He could with great truth declare, with the Noble Lord, that be was now exercising A most painful duty, but he would also tle deco with hint, that, hoWever painful the task, he felt that be ought not toJecline it. But suppose the law tv be as the Noble Lord hail described it. could they - say she bad committed the crime of High Treason. when the person with whom she was represented to have committed it had been guilty of no such crime ? The thing to which she was accessary mast be a 1 crime; but if it was not such a crime in the man. there .roust be at least a doubt whether it could be such in 1 the person who consented. (Wefts the fact on the ' Part of the violator was treason, it could not be treason A the accessary. The Earl of LlVltitroot. admitted that nothing cont.!, ' be more fair or candid, than the whole statement of Noble Earl who had spoken last but one. Ile conent- 1 red perfectly in the sentiment which he hail introduced I 1t the close of his speech. if the question was WWII at the be - would be, be was sure that I feel that he was sitting in a a case with which no politi ' be permitted to interfere.— 11 feel that no one, however I im, should be hound to cda- ' in the question than that . character and conscience as The period for the Noble Lord made such objections as he had before the secood reatline of the He had stated that the Bill oueht , r. The present was not the t of his Majesty flovernment, 1 he should feel no difficulty pursued by himself and his now was, what was best to public tranquillity, to their . the . ions Individual, and towards _ country at large : . assumed, fur the take of ar gument, that thecharges were true, and that they could be proved; but he had never attempted to conceal that, even with that assumption, it would be better to h ar e i avoided any proceeding, if that could hr done. in his 1 opinion it might have been avoided had her Majesty remained abroad, bat be felt no shame in acknowledg , inatbat from the moment she came to this country, iv gut up that opinion. On the arrival of her Ma jesty in ,Bagiaad,Uovernment must have done one of two tbings—either they must have acknowledged her .4141 Queen, with all the rights and privileges of her si tuation, or they must have entered int , the question sow before the House. Under these circumstances . the Bill, was brought in, and that day was Axed fur . the woad reading, in order to afford an opportunity for hearing counsel and evidence in . f.tvour and against 4, 1 1 they mild clearly see their way to any other comnonf proceeding!' which was preferable. they 'night r:gret what they had begun ; but, unless that was the meet he moteld submit that no good purpose could be enure/ by interrupting a proceedipg which promised the m ss speedy termination, and was in every respect • adequate to the ends of impartial justice. He was sot disposed to differ from either of the Noble Earle V SO *sir opinions respecting Bills of Pains and Pe naltim.,. If there could be s clear course of trial, it wombi g lopreferable to such proceedings—but, if there seta ceer-thimg in the legal argutnent, all proceedings nsigibielms .greyed by a mere technical objection. - —.Do onontwits, under all the cirentnitadeek the At . t Potollt-ht adopt. There was, in fact, ouly that and /opeashonnt, and this difficulty presented itself in . .11sa latter course, that, if adultery INas not a high - o mime aed misdemeanor by the law of the land, an .. impeachment could not be conducted. Suppose, then, • that tho qpietino was referred to the Judges, aid that , the wow of those Learned Persons denied it to be a .1 1 -Itigit aisle end misdemeanor, it was true that their I Lactinition snight, as in the case of Dr. Sacheyerel, de- I sift wa r the opinion of the Judges, but still the ! aften t .snant be prejudiced in some measure by that .0044. , Every one ofthe arguments which had been evil opient the mode of proceeding in general would qpiply ce every case of divorce that was brought before thelckoed,sbips. In ail those cases what had they 1 . ; Tbtre had unfortunately been ca s e s i n which ; FA wive of Members of that House had been f Nested, and bad thereby lest their rank and privi lege*. .What bad their Lordships done in those cases?. Had they not degraded the wires, had they pot indicted as great a punishment, allow ance Wag made for the imparlty of the situation of the Quaes and of those Ladies, as it was how I priposed $o Indict ? in those cases, indeed, the flouts denmsdisi the fullest proof of the fiat of adultery,/ and is this case, he ousted, they would . not poccesd to pass the Bill without equally Mang proof. Was not every Divorce Bill an e.r poet nerd law ? It was nut the law of the land, that a woman - should be divorced even for adultery ; for though the the bar, as lie hoped it 14 emry Noble Lord would fe j.rdicial capacity, and on a cal bins whatsoever should For his own part he should cioißely connected with bin side, any other interest i which he owed to his own a. tsar mid as a Nan. Thi (Cunrscenn) to have made „ l eg day, yas bettm lit been fired. He has to be got rti of altogether time 4o review the conduct but when the time arrived in vindicating the course colleagues. The question be done with a view to the ditty towards the Illustrior . the country at large ? He I as to retracting his steps., if it WAS thought that awither mode of proceeding were more constitutional. But he should object Wit if it was intended merely to delay or suspend tlfe ene.isure. • The Marquis of Lisirooolv said. it was neressary for him to advert to the peculiar cirrenistnnees in which the House stood, and to the reasons which had induced him to give his codseat to the Kra reading of the Bill. He mould not et, the length of snyint, though some persons in that Hou se , an d more o u t of it. were of that opinion, that on ftft, occasion what ever should they pass Hills of Pains and Penalties. He had the deepest sense of all the inconveeirnees which often attached, and all the injustice which always appeared to attach, to Bills of this nature, bat he shattlit feel it to he his ditty to the 'tutor of his power to defend and to presets., and which, when ap plied with justice. might he material to the well being of the country. The gronuti on which Ise wasimineed to consent to the admission of sea) a Bill in the pre sent instance, was the alle!?tion of the Noble Earl who !bought it in, and of others who took upon them— selves the responsibility of suck a ffteriire. that On oth:d. means existed of heinging under consideration and of punishing nets, on the consideration and punish ment of which (the said) the safety of the State de ' pended. On dill ground alone it seas that he eon rented to the first reading of the Bill, end to allow it to remain on the Table. Disapproving, as isesiid, of all the prvliminary proceedings liviore the Bill was introduced, which, in his apini,di, tended to wealseathe effect of tvliwever venchtsion they might tome to, and to produce the prejuiliee n W.. 11 at that tinge foisted. be had not, nevertheless, ohjected to lay the Bill on she table, because he thought thus touch respect was die to any Member of that Howie who took opus himself the responsibility of so !rote • an eri-ssatieu, that it ' thould'be seribiny whethei reFttidsseist was driven to that eittivoie remedy ? But hewing. ailowed ' the Bill to lie ow the table. they were sow titled on to inquire into the existence of that necessity which for the time they had aessered upon the iptt df nit of one of their menshe-s ; and whether public justice sod expediency would not be sati-fied by some other step thin that which the Noble Earl who had brought is the Bill declared to be unavoidably necessary. Bit the Noble Earl (of Liverpool) talked of the inmate niencies of delay. Brallowed the pen incostreniescies which attended every delay of this process. but how much less that inconvenience was that what would ari'e from persevering ervoneonsly in a coarse which all sides admitted to he otjertionable--which its warmest friends deelareld was on he taken only bseanse gency of the case. At ten minutes before two. hr order of the House, 'lle Counsel were called in. • The large folding doom were thew thrown open, and Mr. Brougham, M. Des man, Dr. Lushington, Mr. it illiams, Mr. Wyatt, and blether Learned Counsel entered, and took their *WI 'llincat the desk on the right-band side of the inclosed spare immediately in trout of the bar. His Majesty's Attorney and Solicitor-tieneral, and four other Learned .Oentlettsen, with Mr. Maple, Solicitor to the Treasury, entered from the side doer, and placed themselves ea the opposite side of the bur. The Loan CIIAIUMLLOR baring put the questions. whether it was their lawdshiFs' pleasure that her Ma jesty's Utmost' should be called in ? ' The Dab* of HAMILTON rose to inquire under what lostructimse, cod by whose order, his Majesty's Asz lorney-Otmeril appeared at their Lordships' Bar ? The MIIIIIIIIRV-011LNIMAL 'Ailed, that an Order of that Hones had been served upon him, from which udder it appeared that Counsel would be allowed to be bead is the course of the Bill before the serous' lithidhelythereof. and in obedience to that order he had *lt It Ms ditty to attend personally, or to appoint Visatasoljo attend, in order to produce the evidence, ll would hereafter be produced in support of the The Doke of Haarturou said. he bad yet to learn ander what iaitracsioas Lis Majesty's Attorney-Denc ' eel had protocols& The Illtramorr4Ovraaat. repeated that in conse eluenee of die Order which he had received, be felt booed either ter attend is person, or to depute stone elate Ws Osol. As it was accessary to produce !e%itience Lesolthips' Bar, be had taken the 'lllll, coons think *as agree to him, tamely. to *lain front the poipaa source. He had aceorti• 'telly appflod ioliwa.Sairiokiry of State. who had tar Vied the oarossary 4ofursaatioa. thilobe Dube of filasitspoar said he was certainly and ' Ous to kwtivol who was. timeproonotor upon the present refry-100, mid if he oaduestuod She statement of the AttertterOemstal.' Is *oared that the Secretary of State was the plampecateo ferias. of ao, no, from some pale* of House]. The Bari of Lossarov...iaiti, that his Majesty's Attotory'bed taken the boat items •of obtaining infor elation brapplying to that Boansary of State; that irforotsfilow•lhtt hoes sapplia l sal the regular coarse *soli W; dotal filagestplf Aillesey-tieneral should libroaeot Veoporlihas.olle a theiraLoirdships' Bar. WA Illelliiies-egemd the she aim, which the WiflirWolllllolll dial ram with a view ebtakiiiM ilelfralabeammildleientlP alidectorr...a w '• • SW 90.4patittehle Writ viliittioall their Lealebipi tllt foil :-•..My.i es pik, 1 hors She tend a' your Lordships' Bar on behalf of the c n. I am anxious not to incur the most tit there was no other open? The oliseinef 6f soy de- lay which could arlee w,aild be lunch more than roan terbaltsiced by their arriving at a muds of proceeding! more consistent with the principles of the Lionstitu don, more respected by the pnblie, and wore•ntisiae- I tory to their Lordships' own minds. He should hardly hear it said by any tine that no doubt existed oo the subject. The Noble Lord on the Woolsack would hardly assert it. His own (the Marquis of Lanoline:es)! doubts he would not alitqlge as worthy of any weight. But he should nut err when he alluded to doubts of high authorities he Might mat err, perhaps, if be said some of the highest authorities tfor be believed the Noble Lord on tße Woolsack would allow them to be among the higheft.) Instead of saying that these authorities doubted, he should rather say that they were decidedly 6f opinion that the impossibility of proceeding against the principal did not make it im possible to proceed against the areessary. The in quiry, whether a Bill of Palms and Penalties was the only mode of proceeding, would be at one time or other forced upon them, and he thought it hatter fur them to inquire at this stage whether they could res Here themselves from a measnee so pregnant with evil?' The Farl of LivenroqL and Bail Haim explained. The F.arl of CAR*APS'ON said, that though he objected to the prat-yeller in this ease altogether, , l and would willingly al"! any measure which afford se a chance of putting au end to a Hill in which be saw nothing but uoqualified mischief. It was I said that this was not the period to revise the course of their prociedings If this argument was admitted as the Bill bad been bronght in an the t mere allegation of his sditjetty's Mieistert, Ind was now to lie pruettetied In as a *atter of necessity. l they would he obliges, to Parry' on Bills of Pains and Penalties at any time that his Majesty's Mipt.ol stern chose to piopose them, With the M and Insurmoutftable objections to Bills of Feint and - Plritel• tits, there was Cis adekatage, that a t every a t o g a 4; die proceedings the dooms could reconsider its former . ; votes, and again end again terse to a diseussion of the principle. lie could not agree with that part of thl sentiment of his Noble Friend (Earl Utey), if their was no other' mdde of proceeding, he vote for the pi-tweet/int tit Bill of Pains and ties. His Noble Frieturvilistit'd it *to be arnierstood: that lie did so beraase was a distinet timer of adultery. Yet it su happehed, that this diarist?, tin qualified charge was not to be }BOA from the begin ning to the end of the gill. fir should vote for the' amendment, in the idea that there was some - remote possibility that they might And some way of *toping from this suomakius Bill. _ • that 1 theta& ! Passlid .. Earl liras, in explanation, /admitted, that the pre. amble of the Bill contained wary things which shUlild ••••••1•11Mplm•••, - ; t % I 4 , proposition. trial to • !life' Anse, . i should Make '1 _ express VT That gout hoidehipe dial, n ot think 6t .li tr irlillk suggestios, to which there could be nu objection, viz. that in calling over -the Peers, the Christian names i r e gs t .ea s tit o i o .of e i teseeat i„ . y 0u i 4 47 44, Ullly should be called , cree d intimated, that all that latitude .of eh os i 'l'he Judges having been absent about •20 minntes, shonld - he zreeerrete to • i subsequent st age st returned to the House. ' ceedings, and that upon the qnestion f or th e re.t.'ing ol_flie 1411, I should be enable , ' to iiii tettus , Chief Jnstiee AIIII4OTT said that the !louse had re jackal q Bill alto g ether . I ita lily . ferret! to his Learned Brothers, to consider "if the - I .,_' r - 4 ! .p.._ . _ . • I ; that t hi s peps a h at now arriveu, an d that hid ' of any cifieVner; which Maybe prodoeed sate • wife of the Mi r Aipsren of ?Ise realm be violatetrby ; a foreigner not tilting allegianee to the King, she i i r f ore any evidence is Ave into as to the all ' consenting to such .riolatitin, whether she was guilty those facts—lying those allegations out of feintingof _High Treason, with mi in the true coruction of the ' present, or eves ad mitting them to be t rue h e a qi. ri y otos! . po all former ocean? . Statute of p ith Edward 111." and they were all of "'ea t '" al r , all of as which , uu a if l , il. were Dess4a4l. I iset . , opinion that she 'lid nut thereby eftnilliit High T reason . 2 :n1? co lo ur of roancanos tv atevet,—l soil Their opinion in this case was grounded on the lan- the principle of the Hilt, upon grounds of ettage of the statute, which still that if a man do rio- fi li s force cannot 6 Weakened or affected ley late the wife of the King's eldest son, he was guilty of ran he offered as Ti the truth of Ilse (ego & Hy high treason. Unle.:s !hetet'. , re a man mold legally called upon 40 sheer, that lam seeedonad4Peereigl be eltargrd by an indictment with high treason, which in objecting to the principle of this Bill, abblogh ha t indictment must bear in that as in all other caws, that b tl l i s a n t e t e h t e o p a r n e s 7e w n l t a i p c h m h c a ve t i p n r g ec h erl a s ed n i et : I . "PI" "is. the crime seas committed ag-aitiAt the man's duty tID Lordships of the case of the Duke and Medal the Crown, the wife consequently e.mld not be churt.ted in 1600. In that case it apposes Actium ,P? as accessary to that offence. As a foreigner, not J ourna l s , t h a t p rocee din g s took ..... poc owing allegiance to the Cro n tt, was not bound by the nature :—First, the Duchess t, of . s p e . local laws or Englaitil, be cetild nut be charged with titian to the 'Hoag oft fiords. not • had committing that c ' j been brought In, PT that a copy eil i ttail served her, nr even that she had It was then ordered that the Cannsal be called in. ti lo oliftlite in t ention to bring such a ="l o dae ssuisoioup lidee The Marquis of L.sYsitowna called the *tie:Anti of ! that she had been informed that 1110111111. • the Kam to the situation of certain persons shoot to i had tiered • Bill, sod haaibl i T he lia appear at their Lordship's Bar which he thought de- l before the Bill was received. served to be noticed. By a vitt. of the other House f this Petition into consideration, . as relish, learned persons had been permitted to appear the Bill had been tolgeellas bat not received, wig mil Jan. 160 d. that her (}race should have pod* at their Lordship's liar as C4tittisel for the Queen. — she .Itetaki be beard 4. her Gemmel on tie Their Lordships would prolothly concur in sanctioning Tuesday as to what abolimi. so object waled powielq their pleading at their laird .I,i,.s' liar WI the present t h e said as year ung s id ge w ill o t tootoo . that O m occasion, In what lie had to say on that subject he f sel were to be heard tunicspinet rewires,_ was far front casting any retieetions on the individuals 1 have been told belle ':Illat sad a thin Wile di to whole be had alluded. From the knots ledge he bad , itoProcticalkYliol I h Pd. Ilh_ita with alllill. of theta by had we Jr tart that they would acquit them.' approaching _to scorn, n t prepeutea is selves with all dee *kilt r and propriety that timid be 1 that in hell/Mot' aar however straweil, Imild be beard aresotit il* Ant real e( et either ezpeeteilae desired. 11, roust, however, rewind t Ki n , ~„4 p ena lti es . .caret to w a to . b the House, that it was wily possible for them to ap- , against the eroticism adds Bill air eyes aphe pear at their Lordships' liar by virtually withdrawing first reading of the Bill, let the decision of Li thearseiret fru*, that tautly of which they formed an I ships has precluded me floe asking what w inherent part, aid in which they represented bodies have been vrar u nili bf_Proet'dell la , who had as good a right to. be represented in Perlis- L ow d o I no* d? Tito Duchess of N scent as any other in the nation, and who, by the err- be recollected. was heard over and oveTlpht. rangement to which be referred, were left unrepre- was heard apinst receiving the Bill. she ew ' against the first reading of the Bill, and ohs we sensed. He -*hiked to submit to the House the pro- heard o n the second reading upon the poise f priety of talking it understood that they only sanuit- I pie. •nil'spost the point of •erideace. The tett to each a deparntre from the established practice Ito whirls I would refer. if I an sot atiomor of Parliament in consideration of the particular ewer- ling your Lordships,:sra that of &nigh' 1169:4. , nd - -.1 Ass' , ease is ir _,, and Lord gniltees's _ the Duchess of Norfolk, end that of Lard is both cases of divorce. I regret, and it is with reluctance that I am compelled to make this ella in passing upon the Report made a Cesnwilletsfp -17,60z Lordships. I regret that that W ewe 10 ee 'aware of these cases, and that they ens WIWI tarn to those pages of lholusroals whieh ewe •.• man to the matter of iequiry. Lisle et wilassew,k 4 he found were orderoito Ise furnished to the against whom Ole preceediep were inellieted. he told, perhaps, that the Moped of the CcoollN fen only to the BIM of Tilts and Patoehlee, Mb these are cases of divoree. In two mom bills.% which this objection does not mit aid WO not biscuit; an the Report. a list WI lowed. It is now too late to a& Clive; what I have shown, I shps vs dented by precedent in asking, bet 11t/s 1 IT. ships will allow me to pray to htna — t MINI the proceeding against the princi NI Her Majesty's•Commel bale.rlai-741•001,111110 dran-, Mr. Brougham, as is Itillalt Mini a i r and then returned to.sha Bar. The Earl of Lerestruha said the reipit 4ol . would be to call spod Ille Ifteery's AlNferrs"" teepee the cue by producing evidence Mb* be ships' Bar, and then In atill 111 0011 ships' part of her Majesty, to snifter the use by =mi.—. int to repel the evidenie, lei over and ihrAl it object. if they thought 64 isshe. principle of the , 'lbis would be the regalia: course of peemaselsi; 11l if he understood the applicatise of the Oeuesti, it'. to be heard upon the priatelpie of the lIIIIr lastly of the Bill, or assamosi the scats P" *de good. Se could not Yip thieking Oast O' an inconvasient stage of the proceeding Willi ° application, but he should gill yo take Await' Noble Lords opposite upon she quweilot hmis" W I any decided o, ioion spit it, After a short pasf..ibiraD Cnancess' that unless some Mobil joi e pads a e torney General must of coarse *- to the modern oeuesto6' I. discuss the principle' was gone lute. The roafitirsainibis was es-- A. b . P . game if the facts Were vitt *OW, there wadi 11 ' 1 oftesion to go into the prieuilsk 811. 11 go t Lord KearYllft said, Ow. dory PhAlra Lowe as he did, even if all the fartedibrimi sektil_r ii i jesty were pr.nrell, this,plll clegpat poi to pies 3.1. Meese would harrgreataMmiluko4ll"l"hstetdeli ,if any argasswer soar le hoetight would avert 4ese paled& ' !WI shot to wkatewer 401111, • , the Mill ought: mass" • s lae tlisallit era,thetatinush *PIO ° Y he lak e T f e r lpar tilassrliseg st the i • en and he should move, therefore, that ' . fie !,,, lowed to preens'. ittimakir 1 • ' . . m i . ". .T i r . .'.. I • 1 - ••• • - . ' 10 . •; i ;:s . ; j1 I i ii . r n ta s e k el lf u i t n ,a te t. r a r_ n n y pt o i . n r g yo t u h r is2. o ; r o d u s rt, hip . 7mayo r 4ie i oters,vii . L lOW • wish to he stopped the , r ; / • E.:vivo:o4l4l ours co .ii•U II . ire lif ',pa in 6 o' - v - . Wed into i , nil 'to and I certainly Ilso-fusclies. U. au not in faii..w4gozsg jams, Ll i e_tis_of ejsagsgjajagli,usang jost_Av i Lilo iuc dr ma de aa r„. :: . matrimony. What, 'then, was every , Divorec Bill should be. Brit there alfrar:o to — AirCtliat to be interrupting your Lordships. My lliell " I. 4 but in some degree a contract-Aim' lb thef AY p that I cititiAthe Attorney -tteneral, does not appear-to k ~,,,"1 " 4 0 tho lewd ) . What was it but purshiliasoat ioAkted fat and insliatiatApiLitaiLlriiiikris-si st iPlllid 41,4ht(ile,,Illowever indiscreetly . .... ... zaki_isurbajaiseby be attends here. H e .-: 't "Tn . ' . ' an act whirl, the law did not expressly derive to be The guestipiN rio thfp ppt un sr rry s amen - that a notincifion has been set. -"' hil crii&iial ? Yet the House did pass such inns, hating( mint ; al d(flaidn'ejai - etillitd*r; but the demand tea your Lordships, but in what capacity h ze i t . , ret u , n, b eer A tafffiLit 4i ewevre tmem , L etey 1 . , • i llt always to the evidence, and this BM also they • . -vrivhdrasent and Ihromostslosbot was agreed to. Lordships' lisr, does not very distinct! ' . Aot pass, except oh stifficiebt evidence. tie * did not ' tided' Justice Aerate, , for himself and the other cop j aciiv in isfltlelr be irttends c herZi erer an d egl ie s t imy strewn to say that there was not a great tlidereare bed Jtt'Ort, prayed lest* to withdraw to deliberate ow the trteen ordinary Divorce Bills and this Bill. lint not. question referred to eitfoin. Friends have the honour of stlentlitg at as tot his question ; indeed, his arguntent was strength -1 During the absence of the Je l l„ es, the Earl of Lttalt- ships' Barogiowedy and clearly am behoi l l e: erred by the silifereece. The pregent Bill had a rabil. root. ruse to suggest. that to-morrow, or at least der- i The last time thld the honour of stamliaghsga lie character ; it was not on accost's' of injury •to an i inn the eishoequent ismer the proceedings, some mode and in this dimwit', your Lordships deny hll% idual, but on account of Nun? to the stale that might lie devised ,of si+nring atten d ance without the to delay hearing, till a snhsequent stare-wr e VI the Bill was to be passed. This, therefore, *made his delay of ciltiox over the name'. One mode that icend'eargisso the urarrouled:r. arguments s w, h ea lef: si l d luans4iy arguments the stronger, for if they would lay that obey occurred to him was, that every Peer on entering the principle ierbi Bill. Li P y the orde e r ra of tio L,' wools! deerade one individual for toe.wthe of *latostiter. Douse, should write his name, and the time he entered. on the 6 A 411 July, her *Neal's Counsel how ••h the rather should they dolt for the sake stT Lord alto.L.tyis said,, the practice of calling °ter to i ed, that in the.oheetwatious which th woh the State If the question were, flowerer, stately . tele names was the most usual and regular. mitred to make, they would be so .s k sb, referred to the Judges for the satisfaction of the Mune: 'The Earl of Li vsapoot, sonic time after said, though: , Proceeding' .pas the Bill whisk med,si n as to the re4-nlarity of its proceedings. be should boil, an ohjeetiots had been Made to his former propositioes 4 711. ' Lordships 4' ill 4*-6 11 ag. no objection to it, nor should he have the lez:st delicacy it was sh ota;crial to site time, that he should ritakeli otir htdw ,.7 , r ,r_ . °e t ' that I then vev" ii t. ........e.......:,._ ..%4 .__. al6 ea . 'P." l . ll . l '' ". te ex P r ng tr! letteatsos. . F II