The National Register. — London, England, 1815-03-12 00:00:00

166 consequetices.--( Loud 'HMI emit limed cries of hear.) fortunate case of Mr. Vyse, the Hon. Baro n et, beforebe called it " legal murder," ought to have remembered that the inquest was stilj sitting--that all the evidence bad not vet been heard, (hear, hear, hear). But if the Hon. Baronet valued the peace of society. he conjured him to abstain from such language at the present moment cheering).— As to himself, he knew that the delu'ded multi tude had sought for him in all directions that they might heap des truction en his head—hut as he had only introduced the measure from a sense of public duty--a measure that would not benefit him for any other belonging to him one sixpence—he should not flinch from the consequences. He again conjured the Hon. Baronet to do what be thought was Iris bounden duty, to abstaiu flout using such langnage / its had just fallen from hint. Lord CAsTI.EI: II declared, notwithstanding they had heard from him an invective against the Constitution in its present form, and to less sincere an invective ag 'lost the Govertuneet, that lie consi dered the Hon. Baronet the sincerest and the most effectual sup. porter of the Corn Bill in that House (loud cheering). If in his heart lie were not the sincere friend of the measure, why had he never' once attended in his place in that House to oppose it (continued cheeriest.) He had given some explanation of his sentiments, but the explanation was at best equivocal (hear, hear!) and his belief of Sir V. Burdett's real opinion was still unaltered, Tbe Hon. Baronet had charged the Government with wantonly introducing the military, and thereby abetting in the comtnission of" legal murder;" but three or four years a:o, when so many lives were lest by the disturbances in the metropolis, TII EN " every man's house was his castle." (loud ' and continued cheering.) But, now, whets those outrages took place, which even the Hon. Baronet could not defend, when peo ple adopted means to secure their property front destruction—when, deeming " their house their castle," they resisted those who would break in upon such sacred territory, they were guilty of • legal mur der" (incessant cheering). He knew his own temper, and be believed it would carry him through the arduous trial; bat this was such an insult to common seme,as to rouse up all the feelings of his nature. He never expected to hear such an abuse'of the liberty Of debate (hear.) Although they might dispute about the principles - of the Hon Ba ronet, Isis practice of them was clear enough, for what he aimed at was nothing less than a sebversion of the Constitution. (Loud and continued cheering from all sides of the Honse,)—The lion. Baronet came there to invite the opposers of the Corn Bill to join him in the promotion of his wisher'. Fit oily believing this, he (Lord CO would call on them to declare whether they were prepared to em bark in the cause of the Hon. Baronet, and join with hint in the aobversion of the Constitution. He conjured then, to reflect on the consequences of identifying themselves with the Hon. Baronet, and to labour to clear themselves tiont , any such imputation.— Hear, hear.) Mr. M. A. TayLon defended the. introduction of the military, observing, that the Hots. Baronet was a little out in his law in supposing that it was not perfectly warrantable to use all possible means of defence whets a matt's castle was attacked. Mr. Ille'ruusrn, though an opposer of the 13111, disclaimed ail par ticipation its the Hon. Baronet's principles Sir A. PAGET said, that the people were strongly cautioned I against remaining, before the soldiers fired out of Mr. Robinson's house.—(Hear, hear!) Sir J SEBRIGIIT also defended the introduction of the military wider civil controut. thinking that the Government had evinced too much moderation —(Hear !) If his house were attacked, re gardless of what the Hon. Baronet's constituents might think On the subject, he should defend it by all possible means—(Hear !) Sir F. fivenEirr wished to say a few words its explanation. Ile had not meant to attach any imputation to the Right lion. Gentleman (Mr. Robinson) : 6e had objected generally to the introduction of a military force," which he toast consider as a symptom of military despotism. lie had argued dist the civil [meet alone ought to quell a tumult in rumor times, whets a standing army was a thin(' unknown try the nation. In these days the civil power had been sufficient, and Is by not now ? " I must now (said the Hon. Bart.) allude to certain expressions which she Noble Lord has thought proper to use. That Noble Lord has charged me +4 ith a wish to subvert the constitution ; I charge him with having actually subverted the constitution in the sale of seals in Parliament. Ile was di-iecied in the fact. The No- M e L o rd uugt-t to have lost_Cis head ; and would hive lost it, it the 'prise bad not oeen ma corrupt tiwimp-ach him. He ecenped because de delinquency was gyncral. The Noble Lord may laugh, rind so may the majority behind and around hull ; but you, Sir, (inr.:ing to the Speaker) did not think it a subject of ridicule when in the %slung lan guage. of iisdi2nation and abhorrence yam denounced the practice as One lit which our cuttstora mould have started nab hot ror. As to the of defending his house so streunotislv again s t the attacks of th e Ele c tor s of ‘Vestminster, he w il l wait Jong oiotagh if he waits for any attack from them: he - mar be perfectly at ease. as he may be ass' red that there will be no call upon him !or any exertion of hi, sp i r i t. I . must agn i n s ,,y, th at th e N,,ble Lord opposite could not (rave escaped but for the corrum slate oi the House of Commons." Mr. METuticsi called the Hon. Baronet to order. Such language was a violation of the usages of Parliament. After loud calls of " Citair, Chair." The SAEAKER obseryed, that the Hon. Baronet had been long enough in Pa:liament to know that such language was disorderlvt Sir F. lieuDETT—" I know it, but I wish that all your orders were obeyed, and I wi•II also that it was a breach of truth as well as of your orders to declare that this House ill collected together by corrupt incous." Mr. H. SuNINErt wishes[ the Hon, Baronera words to In' taken down, in first violating their orders, and then saying did it litiow• ingly, (Loud cites of No!) Sir F. IIunDETT a It is perketly indifferent to me, whether my words are taken down or not " Petition wits tl►rn brought up, read, and ordered to sir on the tablp. General GASCOIGNE preenteil a Petition against the Corn Laws signed by 47,863 person. BCON.4PAIZTI: IN FRANCE. Mr. WHITBREAD said, a. his motion respecting foreign relations stood for Wednesday next, he should be glad to know whether the additional treaty of Chaumont had ,been ratified; At the same time, he wished the noble Lord to state, whether it were true that Itziona. parte had lawied with troops in France. Lord CASTLEREAGH replied, that the ratification of the Treaty had been received, and would he included in the information A% bids he intended to give to the House. As to the landing of Boonaparte in France, his Majesty's Government had received utiicial jtito 'nation of that event. NATIONAL BEGJS_EER. .As• to the nn• II Hon. finronet t CORN VILE. The third reading of the Corn Bill being moved, Mr. l'unTlixitiiE moved, as au amendment, that it be read a third time this day Nix months. A long detate then arose, in which Mr. Wilberforce and several members took part. The house then divided. For the third reading', .1-15—Against it. 77. An Amendment was offered by Mr Portman, fixing the foreign price at 76s upon which another division took place. For the amendment ?v.—Against it, tl3. Mr. Bariug's amendment that the bill should be repealable within this presint session, and the other respecting the co-extensiveness of the bill with the Bank Restriction Act, were then carried. the for-- mer in the affirmative, and the latter in toe negative, without a di vision. Adjourned. , . . ~ TUESDAY'S LONDON GAZETTE. • `I BANKRUPTS. J Reilly, of Hart street, Cructlierl , friars, merchant, to surrender, March 14, 25, and April 13, at one, at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. 6weet od Stokes, Basingliall-street. W. G. Russell, of Norton Falcate, oilman, Nlarch 11, 18, and April 18 at twelve, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr. Long, America sql Are. . . J. Davies, of Flint, cheese and corn merchant, March 14; 24, and April 18, at ten, at Guildhall, London. Attornies, C llr. Buttertidd, Charles-strert, City•road. 'l'. Oldlitld,, I)eritend, Warwickshire, grocer, March 17, 18, and April 18, at twelve. at the Swan Tavern, Ihrmingliam. Aitornies, Mr Smart. maples Inn, London ; and Mr. Benson, Gilmore-row,- 13i run h a in. W. Graham, of Carlisle, merchant, March CO, So, and April 18, at eleven, et the Duke's Hear+ Inn, Carlisle . Atturnits, Mr. Birkett, Cloak lane, London ; and, Mr. Blow, Carlisle. W. Jackson. of Carlisle, fishmonger, March 22, 23, and April Is, at eleven, at the Dish Inn, crirlislr. At:orniev, Ares!4.s. Nloilosey and Sisvon, Carlisle; end Messrs. Mounsey and Fisher, Staples Inn, oidmi J. 0 , 1) ddi.qon, of Southampton, baler, March 23, at one, f.'4, nt eteven, and April 18, at one, ut the Cmorge Imi, Suuthamptun: iornies. Mr. North, Southampton ; and Mr. Whitaker, broad court, Long Acre, I.ondon. T. E'y, in Isle ui E'y, wuul.lapTera s 4 iha4. ll w' , .