The National Register. — London, England, 1822-03-11 00:00:00

' ~ e • - - li.nuenr ontii;med fi un parks 71. Itah , taniN oe bzx I, 111 Ed:Ashsagh, sognell lo) 1100 bn. 1,11.1 Milli) from the atkutatee 14.,7111i14 the 16111. Str It. FERGUSON iirebenteil a ;iin.lar petition from the aihtte.,ti sof ; slot a itero aid:. a like elle lion+ tile itivorporaivil 101 Mr. 11A !tit r pre,esiteil a •onfilstr petition from the ma.oas mat ;az oilier trades of 1-:ilthisur;;ll. 1 hey were sever:tit) refericd to tile Collitgitler, w i th liberty to cull counsel. Mr. N. RICE ttttt ved for accounts of taxes that hive cesi , ed (hiring the last tear; the piothice of tile sane for the Sear brim e the te i .eiti, tar as the same oe,;aided It eland us well as England. I Lea Esrt: a 3 s I.EN N RD asked when it was likely that the itcl.cala r jail es ithime would be printed and ready for delivery. Mr. sail, that he had nut occasioned any delay ; Ihe evidence was bow pi 'Klatt Igor.—Mr M LEY moved for nn account of monies due to the Batik of Irel and from tho NI. N. tilt EN FELL Callea the stileototo the I louse to the fact, that, acroldio,.. to atit accoant Proposed w ISIS, the batik of t•ti.llld slid tut rev i ve any thing foi stsaitaging the public debt. Sir J. N IiWPOIIT said, if the Batik- of England and Ireland were to be cowl-tested, it was but fair to mention hat it was a pall of the cubsideratiou for the charter re stewed in HOS. Mr. PEARCE complained of the insidious manner in vs loch vow. , grattleni.o e ete etontantly in the hallit tit so-akiti4 of that great to:ilia:tat e,tabb-liment the Ilasik of Elightial. With the lion. menthe I ' s (Mr. (;.) Cllll'lll Ilee, it s%its unpile lonattle to make sos h repre,rotations, rot was it notion% to has,. I. at the government several indiums ist pet relit. and given looney at Martin times fur the iciiew;il of view ch.aut r 1 Ile was sort) to observe the intention paid to the modern philiteoplieis, and he also regiewid the I-duellee they had. Theories would not ;wail in the ma. liairsnent of so tionottaut on cstahl . v' went as too Bank of Eogiand. In conduct bud utter been guided by the must banes' motive Mr. RICARDO said, , A holey er the Wink of England became the subjet I of discmsiiiti, he should 'pink of it and its cancel ns us be thought rod felt. TM: directors he did not complain of; but many of its acts mid proceedings had plunged the country into the greatest ilittivulties. The saemiure of 1197, tin it was acted ppm', proved most fatal. fium the Bank directors not koossiug how they ought to have acted. They had is-wed immense quantities of paper utter the rest riet 111 l act, and such issues had tended to the de -1/rVelilllllll, r o ad had occasioned a state of thin,-,s which it would tie t dilicUlt to extricate theatietcre from.—The lilah was, lie feared, mid he therefore telt concerned fur the country, that the doectors did not know what they were 1)11413.—(I1mm) Mr. l'. lilt EN FELL explained. FRI r. lI.GU It N said. that %slit never the therWsts in let fel ed with Iheirulotiey Ii insaetions, then did the country uppioach to the extleines of ii stew. Mr. MONK could not a gave with tie statement that the Book directors had cut Loon it n hat the) were stbout. for in his opinion th re never wits a public hod) that Utidei stood and poroied their ow n inters vi. (setter. Alter the sestrir luso art their 'lock h risen, and liabk.shick was now 4bo per min.—Besides that foci, how moot not; hsa b e en si t e kmutts I eceivid by them He bet:eves' these never was a politic hotly 'het mule such t minnow. prufi s. Mr. T. W ILLSON thodAhl the Mink of Eilland did not tnent toe remarks Glut had been applied to it. The rests ie t was a tievessaly tor:1,08e, nod lie I•cliesei that they lira: Ono:, with the Goseimuent to du is hut could he dime for the public sery are. Mr. MANNING defended the conduct of the Bank. Mr. P. Glt EN FELL never meant to apply his ulster venous to tine Bank Directors. All lie meant to say was, that their itteustires And proceedings hail been extremely pet jsolicial to the public interests. (Hear.) The Batik pm ofits were monitions. He was a Batik Stock proprietor —lle spoke trout what he knew'—he was hemline , ' by their good management. They received seven per cent., and their property unimatited to 30 millions. (Heat.) He .eliattlengval them to disprove what lie now stated. But the flank Directors were ;rally to serve the public. They 3 revived t 'minions misfits and advantages for such ser vices, then it wits ridiculous to talk of tlw it readinesti to -serve 11. e pliblic. hear.) Who would not have liven ready to set ye the public on such terms? Did the house forget that the Directors had, to the last, strietly resisted The repeal, the modified repeal, of the Restriction Art, itad after what hail passed, he declared before the house nod the eoitotry, that it Was quite a murk cry to think that the Bank 81 ncercht tequired the restoration of cash payments. (Cheers.)—Papei ()idea ed. KES gave notice, that on the ISIls innant he •shoislit more the repeal of the duty on tolloss Mr. LU-.4IINGTON moved, that the house go into a eidninittre on the report I especting the reducing of the I', vs. per Cents. Sir. TIERNEY wished this motion to be postponed till the Chancellor (lithe Exchequer could be pi est.'s!. Mr. LUSHINGION telt desirous to puss the motion. If it were requisite, the upon conk' again be rc.cum mitt ed. Mr. TIERNEY was sorry that postponement was not agreed to. Under such circitsisstatices he lutist state, that !Moe resolutions, as yell as former acts rtgartling the Five per Cents., were extremely ambignons. He thought Plat die !OHM! must express itself most explicitly as to what was meant by t educing and paying uti the Five pt i Cents. He would express no opitiitm oti this subject, 'treatise in reality he had none. He w isheul to wade isimitt what resin) was the plan. As to this plan 'sense like that of Pelham, he declared, that as far as be comb' ompreliend (lie two plans, there newer Were twit things mule dissimilar. (Hear, hear.) After some albite% sations Irons Mr. Grenfell, Mr. I)enw mom Mr. Ricardo, Mr. Ellice, and otheas, tile bill was re-cumntitted. Mr. LUSHINGTON proposed to fill up the blanks, and *Bet imam finalise discussion, Mi. DENMAN proposed, as on amendment, to extend the time fur persons entering their dissent trout the Hith to the 30111 ot Alarch. Mr. )N objected to this extension of time, as giving au oppost 11111 l ), as holding out a temptation, to pergulle to etireelete in she funds. Mr. SCA RI LTV suppot lid the amendment. Mr. t% EtHEREEL uppoied it, on the tarns grounds 'Oren by Mr. Lushlngtoo. MI . C ALCRA FT thought no speculations could tithe Di the limos st. tuck would Us so dettell to be regretted as THE NATIONAL REGISTER stiar.ass the passing a bill of this importance, before the public had time to become acquainted with Its contents. Mr 'IIEI2N CY thought it was unfair to press this MCA anre till it as as known what would be the tesult of the negocialions he•ween Russia and Turkey. Lord LONDONI)ERItY said the doctrine of the rielit bon. gent. u cut to intimd this measure for an indefinite time. As [wrote the event to which the tight hon. gent. hail alluded was decided, some other event might arise oat vs Melt the 1 iglit hoe. ;;viii. would w ish further delay. Mr. MARRYATT said, lie coos" 'red 'red the delay as unnecessary. 'llie facts of the case Were known to every one. Ile had linti.elf had letters directing loin to enter dis.etit or not, as lie tlicright proper. lie should not enter a :Miele dissent ; us lie considered it the interest of the holders of Fi. e per Cents. to accept the eller of govern ment, u person disienting would have but lidn., whilst those who accept' d the tiler of Government would have what was worth considerably mere. After a hew words limn Mr.;;Elt NAL. the committee divided—For the amendment, fti—For the original I esti. lotion, 143. Mr. ELLICE asked, if the dissent must lie in the pre cise form issued by the Batik? Mr. LUSIIINGTON said, it would be sufficient if the dissent was the saute in substance. Dr. LUSIIING*II)N thought a form of dissent should be introduced into the hill. t/eon the clause• providing f)r payitt„; off the dissentients in the order, and according to the dale fit their dissents, a conversation of smite length took place. The clause was ultimately adopted. The bill went through the comtuittee, and the report ordered to be a revived. Oa the motion of NIT . . lithe', a return as as ordered of the number of couidsy hank-notes stamped front the lUtti of October, 182), to the 16;11 of October. On the motion of Dr. Lusliiiiiint, there was ordered to he laid before the Otiose all account of all SIIIIIN tlf money ad. v:uu•rd by This country, a twitter by luau or sitteddy. to foreign !toners, from the year 1792 to the present year, distinguish h,g the amount to Vill'h state, and the amount in each scar. Also all account of all sums of mimes becoming, due to this °entry from foreign states in em li year ti iiiii 1192 to the present time, u till tile autumn paid on such accounts in each year. Out the motion of Lord Stanley, leave was givcn to bring . in a hill to prevent fraud, by creditors gruntiiii secret war rants of attorney to confess judgment, On the motion of Sir G. 11111, there was ordered to he laid before the noose an account of the quantity of hotter ex ported from Ireland to foreign countries, from dirnuary, 1811, to Jattuni y. 1122 ; also the quantity of butter imported tutu Great Britain nod Ireland from foreign countries in the saute time, distinguishing the quantity nuported from 11,11 out. Or the motion that the other orders of Oe day be disposed of, a conversation took place bet neett Mr. Demean, the Sol.ritor Gent rat, and Sir. Birch, fill the land tax commis sirtiters' names bull, a. it al - reeled iii ton it of Notting!' on. Toe radii:titer e-t incites were postponed tOlondav neck. Sir K. 11 11. SON .::, , use notice, that an lm. frtend of hi, ve , tuM oppose some to the clauses of the nomad mutiny bill, the -econd reading of which ens hilted for Nlonday. The other orters at the day were disposed of, and the 'louse adjourned at a quarter past wie o'clock tiil Muladay. •• - • 1110.11 TUESDAY NIGHT'S GAZETTE. This Gezette notifies the appointment of Dr. G. Stxldam to be Naval Physician to his Majesty. BANKRUPTCY SUPERSEDED. T. Newstcad and J. U. Cooke, Kingston upon nun, soap ma nufacturers. BANKRUPTS. .1. Thompson, South Shields, ship owner. Solicitors, Messrs. ell and Co. Bow Churchyard. J. Froginot, jun. Burstein, Staffonlshire, druggist. Sols. lessrs. ',limns and Co. Lincoln's Inn. It. Miller, Brimscombe Port, Gloucestershire, banker. Soler Icssrs. Das. and Co. Guildford Street. J. Rickards, l)ursley. Gloucestershire, clothier. Sots. Messrs. 'izard and Co. Lincoln's Inn Fields. J. Avison, Enstburn, Yorkshire, butter factor. Suds. Messrs. Stocker and Co. New Boswell Court. J. Steel, Eiurcort, Warwickshire, timber merchant. Sots. Messrs. Norton and Co. Gray's Inn Squar... Ilembrey, laimbeth Road, victualler. Sol. Mr. Chester. iMelina Place, Westminster Road. DIVIDENDS. March 16, S. Garton, Wood Street, Cheopside, silk manufac turer-30, W. Cape, London Bridge Foot, grocer-30. J. L. Stud& Kirby Street, Ilat ton Gorden, merchant-30, It.Dutlinan nd G. Winter, Jerusalem Coffee Douse, merchant-30, Moberly, NVelbecli Street, coach maker-30, .1. Nowell and J. Burch, .Jewry Street, Aldgme, holesole stationers-30, G. liny• sot', Birtnittglium, spirit merchant-30, R. Jackson, Cannon Street, merchant-2 5 , .1. Ilichardby, Durham, joiner-30,./. 11. Brune and F. Jordan, Bury Court, St. Mary Axe, merchants — April 4, G. Evans. Aberdare, Glamorgatislme, shopkeeper-20, . hailstone. Jlihlcnhall,Suffolk. grocer-6, J. S. Brickwood, Stoke Newington , brewer-2, A. Phillips and B. loser, Salters' H a ll Court, merchants — l , it. T. Gilbert, Stockbridge, coal merchant-9, .1. Whitehouse Oxford, dealer in coals-9 , h. Allport, Birmingham, silver plater-9.5. Jerome, Binuiagliain, victualler. CERTIFICATFIS to be granted Mardi 26. .1. 11. I'loyer, Bristol, bottle liquor merchant—S. Lydon and W. Elwell, Shelf, Yorkshire, iron ILAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH. THURSDAY, MARCH 7. JACOBS V. ROWLANDS. This was an action OD two bills of exchange, one for 441. 16). 3.1. the other for 301. 7s. 6J. Toe bills were drawn by a perron mimeo English, an apothecary at Newport, and accepted by the defendant, a widow woman, carrying on the trade of a wharfinger in the neighbourhood of Newport. Lughsl► had become in debted to the plaintiffs, who are druggists in London, awl the defend ant's sun hieing about to go apprentice to English. the defendant accepted the bills nr quies.ion, and made them payable at Trnton and Co.'s in London. —On the hills bccumtng due they were nut paid ; spoil. cation was made to du: defendaut for payment, when she said she could not 'pay, as the acceptance was not her's but one of her children's. She could not say which of then) it was, it was any one who was at home at the time. She, however, acknowledged that her children were iu the habit of accepting fur hci. -..- - A witness was now called, who proved the acceptance to be either the hand- , YritinA of the son of the defendaid, nr of one of her daughteis, recently dead, hnt they wrote so much alike witness could not say which i t w4l. Mr. Hutchinson anb n titu•d to his Lordship, that here was no proof of hand writing at all. The witness was only able to say it was the hand-writing of either a suit or a daughter of the defendam's. The Cniet Justice said, here was also the :tallow. ledgments of the delentlant, that her children were in the habit of accepting fur her by her authority. and that the hills in question were accepted by whichever of her children were at home, when they were brought for acceptance. Verdict for the plaintiff for the amount of the two bills and interest. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. THURSDAY, MARCH 7. LIBEL. - DE R ‘STOS AND DE SILVAS V HOOFFSTEETER. 'l'uu wag an action brought by the plaintiffs lo recover images for a libel affecting their character as wine merchants. Sergeant Lens stated the case. The plaintiff - , lie said, were respectable Portuguese wine-nterchauts in the city, and the defendant had been for some time in their employment as a traveller, to take orders m various parts of the country. He stone time since entered into the service of another house, and Mr the purpose of pro curing the customers of the plaintiffs in deal with his new employers, he wrote them a circular letter, which was a libel on the plaintiffs of so malignant and treacher ous a nature as he was sure the Jury would mark by ex emplary damages, The learned Sergeant here read the letter, as follows London, 201 h Ails. Uri I. DEAR S I Ft,-1 beg leave to inform you, that in cunse. quence of the repealed dishonourable and ii .respectful con duct on tne pat t of the Pottuguese clerk, (olio acts in the city fur Messrs. de Ilui•to. and Co. who resole in liistnt), and the int' itferent qualit;es tuf their is hits, I have deterinmed to separate myself tt inn such an improper connexion, nod have joined one of the oldest, and most respectable, and in dependent houses sit Oporto, and in this tits, (not Porta xtr se), in a hose tumour and probity I can place the fullest rcluttace, to execute, is WI the best quality of %slurs, On orders with which l may base the pleasure to he favours al by you on my nest juurue)', fur which purpose l shall leos• home in a few days. As a very unhandsome occurrence has taken place at Bristol with one of my oldest ft iends (Mr. William Cross) and Ilastos, by which he is liksly to sutler a severe I..ss, have to request of you not to accept any hi dundrnrin by 11:11105 and Co. or by 'twit:oil Lambert and Son, of Bristol, for the wines vs hicii were landed at Plymouth, until I ba•e the pleasure to see you, or you are perfectly conviaced that the quality will iudemitify you for your acceptance. I remain, dear Sir, Your Waedient fait Itfal humble servant, ALEX. 1100FISTEFFER. The learned Sergeant, after reading the letter, sand, it was so far front being trite that the defendant had left the plaintiffs' employment train any part of their trans actions being disagreeable to h,s feelings, that he had been actually discharged by them, and the other allega tions of his letter were equally unfounded ; and even had they been all true, it would not be a justification of Ms Co niloict. Five wine-merchants proved their having received letters from the defendant similar to that read by toe learned Sens• ant, but none of them had discontiiiiwd dealing with the plaintith in consequence. There were no witnesys called 041 the part of the tie. fend - nit, and there being in specific damage proved iii% the ',art of the plaintdrs, the Jury gave a verdict for the plailltiii—alaldgCS 403. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. MONDAY. MARCH 4. TRIAL OF CARLILL'S SHOPMEN. John Barclay, a youth, was indicted for publishing a blasphemous and seditious libel. in a pamphlet called, " An Address to the Reformers of Great Britain." Mr. Adolphus opened the case for the prosecution. making the usual observations upon the nature and ten dency of the libel. Mr. W. Payne, the chief clerk to the magistrates of the Justice-room. Guildhall, produced a pamphlet, which he said he had received from a person of the name of J. Pinion on the 22ti of December, the day the infinmation was given ag4inst the defendant at Guildhall. The warrant (Mr. Payne said) was at first issued against a man vi hose 11:1111e was unkbowo, be whose person was well-ktiown. The defendant, when brought up for examination, was asked whether he chose to gist his tunic., and he gave it with very little hesi tation. John Porton swore, that he was a constable of Bow street. Ile knew the shop of Carlisle, at No. 63. Fleet. street, and out the 2I st Dec. he raw the doefulaitt serving there. Witiiess mi that purchased a pamphlet born Mtn in the shop; he asked the prism' whom he bought the phattiphlet what his name was? and he re plied " that is a question which I have no right to an swer." On the 22(1 of Dec. (the following day) he obtained a warrant, at Guildhall, and in about a week or len days he executed the warrant. The defendant was then taken to Guildhall. Cross-examined by Mr. Hill for the defendant ;—...Yit are not a city officer. then 3—No, 1 am not. You did not go auto die shop of your own account I ....No; 1 was employed to go there, I was Sent. of the By whom Wcfe you sent 3—lay a gentkman name of Sharpe. Is that the gentleman who is called the "lionorfy Assistant Secretary to the Constiutional Association? I hare heard so. I suppose you did not do t his exactl y for the poldic good, but you were paid lot it f—l wits paid for my loss of time. Have you seen any body in this affair ?--I hate seen Ur. Murray. ... .• .