The National Register. — London, England, 1811-08-11 00:00:00

610 Anne Mills, the servant, lived with the plaintiff at the On the Ist of April, ithe went stand payment of a bill - but the defendant greatest violence; bruised, and she bad had a blister her which time she " bet p 4 , occupations. The Chief Baron statetsto tie Intl, ,4 Medical man had proved Anne 1141 th to have been severely bruised, there was no imputation on her credit as to the causes of these bruises. The plaintiff by law was entitled to recover for the loss of her service, and they would temperately assess the amount of the damages. The Jury found for the plaintiffe.Datusges 101. THOMSON V. LANE. This was an action to recover damages for slander, in (idling the plaintiff a thief. The parties were neither of them very ex alted in life, the one was a butcher, and the other a publican, and one slander was retorted by another. To the charge of thief the plaintiff retorted the accusation of cuckold. The Lord Chief Baron said, he supposed the Jury would think sixpence sufficient damages. The Foreman said. " No that Is too much, a farthing will do." • Gentleulen," said the Chief Baron, good h umouredl y , " I sand corrected, I was too liberal, you certtainly are in the right." Verdict for plitintiff--Damsges One Farthing. York Assizes commenced on Wednesday last. Mr. Baron Wood, In addressing the Grand Jury, adverted to an account he had seen in the newspapers, of the trial of Robert Wright and his wife, at the Beverley Sessions, for various instances of unna tural treatment and barbarity towards Mix. Wright, a child of about nine years of age, the daughter of the said Wri g ht b y a former marriage; of which the woman was found guilty and sentenced to a years imprisonment, the last fortnight of which in a solitary cell.-.." Gentlemen, (said the learned Judge), if the statement contained in what I have just read to you be true, this was a case of murder, and the prisoner ought to have been in dicted here for it; for though the law allows parents and mas ters to inflict moderate correction on theirchildren and servants, ft does not countenance cruelty and oppression; and I hive brought the casebefore you, that you may enquire into the cir cumstances of it; and if you shall find them as there stated, it will be you# duty to return a bill of wilful murder against the Offending party • far no triaLand conviction at aQnarter Se ssions for an inferior Offence can abate or do away a charge of mur der. Indeed. If this was the case, the most enormous- ensues 'night escape an adequate punishment. The law does not give to a prosecutor the option whether a party shall be prosecuted for t.,n assault or for murder, and of sheltering a criminal from the latter by only indicting him for the former. if on due en quiry and investigation into the circumstances of this case, it shall appear to you that the death of this child was occasioned by cruel and geteral ill treatment of its parents, or either of them, you must make such presentment to the Court. If the evidence should not satisfy you that this was the case, the mat ter must rest where it is, and the party must suffer the punish silent adjudged by the Quarter Sessions. I —The Grand Jury, in consequence, afterwards found a true bill for wilfu l murder against Ann Wright. An action was brought at Oakham Assizes, against a person, to recover damages on account of his dog having killed some sheep belonging to a neighbour. It appeared in evidence that there were two dogs engaged in this predatory excursion, one only of which belonged to the defendaTit, his Counsel submit ted whether his client could be held liable, as it was doubtful which animal was the criminal.—The Judge held, that even if one was principal the other was accessary, and therefore both were liable. They were conjoint trespasses, and therefore liable jointly and severally. It was a remarkable circumstance, his Lordship said, hut it was well known, that dogs agreed together to go out upon these marauding expeditions.—Verdict for the plaintiff. A most remarkable instance of that fatal forgetfulness which frequently leads to the detection of crimes, was afforded on the the trial of the Barters, at the Lincoln Assizes, for robbing the mail:—The principal clerk of Messrs. Ellison's banking house deposed, that C Baxter came to him with a 1001. bill, which he wished discounted. The witness suspecting that a!1 was not right, hinted that perhaps it w u; taken out of the Wraghy mail, which had been robbed. The man, with astonishing simplicity last, and offered to discover his accomplices in the robbery in question, provided he should be admitted King's evidence, and be entitled to the reward. Some doubts being suggested as to his knowledge of the fact, he proposed to take.the Gentleman, broker to the ship, to the several places where the stolen silver was secreted :he according took him to the coal-hole of the ship, where was concealed a of silver weighing 471 b. Under a watch-box in the Docks, amongst some flax, he pointed out further quantities, all of which were to be conveyed out of the Docks the first convenient opportunity. The publican hav ing discovered the property to the parties concerned, next di rected the Thames Police Officer to the thieves, who turned out to be two labourers in the London Docks and a watchman, one of the faithful guardians of the night, besides himself. They were all taken before Mr. Harriott, at the Thames Police Of fice, on Saturday, where they underwent an examination. On Wednesday they were again brought up, and further remanded. Upwards of 24001. worth of bullion, it appeared, has been stolen from the Archduke Charle s by the labourers employed to discharge the cargo, of which only a very small portion has been discovered. The footman who robbed Lady Wallace of jewels to the amount of 20001. about two months since, has been traced with the whole of the property, by the Bow-street Officers to Guernsey. Ex ecuTiox.--Samuel Tucker, who was tried on Wednesday se'imight;at Salisbury, for starving his wife to death, voluntarily confessed kls guilt when at chapel on Thursday. On Friday at won he was taken from his cell, and ascended the scaffold in the yard of the i jait. He continued to behave as became his un happy situatson. He exhorted the spectators to shun the first temptations to sin, to avoid breaking the Sabbath, which, he knew by experience, occasioned a disregard for other crimes. The,rope was fixed, during which he appeared to retain his for- The_pla . tforws was then removed from under him, and he was tann~ into eternity. ills body was given to the kir.. aeons fur dissection. 'lucre". was 96 years tad, his wife was 'SO. He was not in the distressed circumstances he had describ ed himself ;---for when he could get no work at weaving, hi travelled the country vending nostrums ; styling himself " Dr. TUCKER, Practitioner in Physic." He was, however, very -ignorant, and must have done great injury in this occupation. BIRTHS. On the 28th ult. at Kilkenny, the Honourable Mrs. Harvey of a son. On Friday, the 2d inst. at his residence, Old Quebec-street, Oxford-street, the Lady of Mr. Thomas Goddard, Royal Navy, of a son. On the sth inst. in Hill-street, the Lady of G. Baring, Esq. of a daughter. MARRIED. May 6, at the Cape of Good Hope, Joseph Hare, of the 2lst Dragoons, Assistant -Adjutant-General, to Sally, third daughter of Wm. Wilberforce Bird, Esq. August 8, at Totteridge Park, Herts, Major Denshire, of the 7th Hussars, to Miss Webb. Lately, at Falmouth, Captain William Middleton, of the brig Argo, to Miss Fox, of Falmouth. DIED. Saturday, Mrs. Mary Franklin, wife of William Franklin, Esq. formerly his Majesty's Governor of New Jersey. At Islington, Miss Jane Crook, Organist of that parish 35 years. Tuesday, Mr. J. Winter, bricklayer of Brixton-place, Surrey, after taking dinner as usual with his 'family, was seized with a riddiness in the head, which, in five hours terminated a short life of 55 years. S u dd e nly, last week, at Honiton, Suffolk, aged 50, Tsaae William Lliooradd, brother to the author of " The Farmer's Loy?' THE NATIONAL REGIS ER. ---, . - ',.-- , -------mv---ir----d--------- l ye . - t ........: he servant, was cat& She stated, that she ► 0 !pelted. "Nirhy how is that possible f There were no bills in tha laintiff at the Canteen In Romford Barracks. , Mme," was, was, in consequence of this unguarded speech, ail- nil, she went to the defendant's rooms to de- relsonded, Convicted. and condemned! f a bill of 31. 2s. *4* was not only . refused, - - tit thrust her out alike appartint-nt with the ' POLICE. :; her neck' was in uence very much - - golon " was obliged to have ei as sistance. She o v :+ :r on her side Tor se weeks ; daring all A reward of one hundred pounds havingimen offered for the had not pee' able to Jr on with her ordinary discovery of a theft committed on board the Archduke Charles, recently arrived in the river from Lima, with a quantity of sil- - on s tile Inry,hhat the Medical Gentle - ver buNon . , indigo, &c. a publican, who had been accustomed Amink to have been severely bruised, and to serve be_r_h_l ,l tb . c ... L , 22 ,... dot2 r D i rks, came forward on Saturday erenfnnliekeft in the robber: in London : Printed and Edited by E. ROCHE, and Published by JOHN FISHER, No 5, Pickett-street, Strand, near Temple-He r s an d Booksellers throughout th United Kingdom, free of postage, WO and forwarded by all the Newsmen, the Clerk s of R oads, the Country at 10s. aid• per quarter.