The National Register. — London, England, 1812-06-28 00:00:00

• s 8 A - • THE NATTONA:T.-RECTISTEIL: • sure rhtmseies, so the present distress of the manufacturers is nut owing to theM, lineurtlit Unjust leaning of America to the aggressive belligerent, and to• her espousing the cause of France a'.:ainst 'England ; a disposition, on her part, which would have found pretexts for restrictive measures, bud even for hostility, if the Orders in Council had never been adopted." IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS. • MONDAY, 31/Nt _2S. • The i.nrds met this day as usual, and after some routine busi►tess, adjourned at hatf-past four. ' TVISDAY, 3VNE 23. The Marquis Wst.t.zsttv rose and stared, that he felt it his bounden duty, atte- he decision which the Commons had• come to, respecting the Ca' to submit in form and substance a similar resolution ro•their Lordsh'ts, and was agreed to in the other House of Parliament last ti gbt. • In loin: this, he felt that he should only act in strict cotitormi.uce to h s sincere opinion, that nothing short of a •complete repeal u the di abilities under wh eh the Catholics labour can give stability or .r.ngth to the British Empire. With that view he should, on Wednesday se'nnight, submit, for the consideration of the•ltlouse, a motion similar to that moved and agreed to in the House of Commons, by his Right Her . Friend (Mr. Canning), trusting - that it would meet the sarnedisoerning and generous reception • which it ex-pecieneetfiin the other *rouse of, Parliament. Earl G kL y thaiadvertirigAp the decision of the question last • n ight in the Mee House, hecoulit•aselevoid congratulating the coun • try, anttakocongratulating himselron the event +..and he assured the Noble Lord on the bench below filth (the Marquis Wellesley) that wlienever;hZ should submit his ,notion to the House, .it would have his unequivocal and cordial support. It was now AVe years since this Parliament was asseinbled, and it was hoTess.sitect far than it was true; that the very Alkireeksof Adenbeiseveribn who assailed him with so much odiutn, and raised-winter him so universal a cry for then only • introducing " a little something," as it was called, in the Mutiny • Act, in-behalf.of the Catholics, should be the very men who last night advocated the capse of . the Catholics, and who exclaimed, that restrictions were continued upon them so lone. After some further f conversation the motion was fi xed for Weds. nesilay se'imight , and their Lord ships were ordered to be sum. ironed: - The *pule resolved into. a Committee on the Curates' Earl G ROSV &NOR urged several objections to the BIN pitnleularly that it interfered with private property, and coneludist by Moving, that the Chairman do leave the Chair. The Bishop of Exerte urged.titcfproprlint : or postponing the Sill fur the present Session, in ortler4ogilve'frrne for furtlyr consider . ;mon.. Tile Doke of NoR rock thought that Curates, demanding an increase ' of saWy-uteler the Bill, might in some instance be ousted by the in cumbent i;oniing•to . rciide on the benefice, and thus the object of the •.13r11 be defeated. ~ • . The Artlibishop of e ANTRR BURY stated, that a licensed Curate couldnot be deprived of his curacy in that manner, as Witte Incum bent did licit reall4 , intend to reside as soon as he quitted the benefice, the liceiled Curate would be again by virtue of his license in the ex. • rise.. his duties in the-gure. The Archbishop of YORK approved generally of the Bill. The of LONDON - urged the necessity of postponing the Bill for the present Session. The k.:ari of 11.kaitov. ay entered into several calculations, for the iitirposeof showing that Curate, received no adequate remuneration, and that non- rewdence among the C 'trey prevailed to a great extent. He conteuded, that no man could discharge' with due correctness the ditties Of more than one paii , h ; yet Curates; from the smallness of the provisi.n. Were mile; a : - .c.,essitv of undertaking the task. Ht did not mean to go j'ar as to assert, that residence could or ought to be Uniformly ehlurced ; ygt it it was admitted to be a duty, it ought to be Lontinett :within narrower limits. He trusted the Committee Would go through the clauses. The LORD CHANCELLOR would willingly givelis vote in favour of the Committee con , inuine, but did not mean thereby to pledge him _... ppear in its final shape. There idence and conscientious resi• :tier was more to'he depended perience, he must at the same abuses too gesrally prevailed ictly and legallr.ier dues. •NOR. the House divided. For and agreed to.—Adjourned. self to approve the Bill when it should :gyp was a great dill rpvce betw.xn legal xesid deuce, an. •.... .614iisipui, that the hi on than , z„ . ., , • ~,_ . 1,;, 5 . ~„1 1 exp , tune de. v - 9 ,- : '' ' 71, 4 kous a . 44 ~ 4 - 4 - t'a- 4 ,•4, g 0 in pay* - •;,: ........,.. • ...., ak strict Afte ' ',j r 4 .— ..** . ' -.1. 4' .• .. :r -,_ the in ' , 4 i ';`•-- ... 11,-V' ' • . ; , Seurat"- ~., et. ... . lea d - . . : II i' ••••• 4 • ' I )41.1.:1(lxV • WEDNESDAY, JUNE `=}• Upon the motion for the third reading of - the Marvate Pier Bill ,• Lore REnkauAt t; pointed out one objectionable clause, w among other things, provided, that all above a particular ape should nai• one penny for permission to walk on the Pier. How', was the age to be ascertained ? He moved that the clause be lett ot.t. The Earl of Lto za root. sail, th it such an Ameadmcnt woud yid the loss of the Bill. It was of great impiii !mice that d pass, as the town of Margate was not secute without such a Pier._ The Amendment was then negatived, and the Bill was read a ;hi time and passed. A l-ng conversation ensued between the law Lords respecting hearing of A ppeals, as a great number of them have now rrianned unheard and undecided several years. • Lord REDES D ALE expressed 3 ‘Visit !IC!: SOille steps might be tarn to acc ilerate them, as great injury was done to the pai tie oy the r re. mainimi, so extremely long sots rumen:. The Lna . r CH tNc.ci.i.ort declared, that no man could perform the archiOns dillies of the Law, and the business attached to tlkit House its President, and satisfy the public and his ow i conseiente dischargingthe weight that devolved on the shoulders of a lord Chan. cellor, increased as that weight was by the important affairs that coat. stantly pressed upon him, unless some alteration took pace as to the manner in which the business of the Law Depa• tment and that of Pa . !'. liamentary.concerns should be transacted Hereafter. Here the conversation drooped, with an understanding, that Lord Redesdale should bring in a Bill to expedite the judicial business. Earl FITZWII.I.2 Au expressed his satisfaction, that the inquiry on the Orders in Council had. in his opinion, been brought to a favoura'. - ble issue. It was matter of congratulati in for hini,•that Mini , teri3 had renounced, it) this and other instances, the errors of their forum policy. He shou'd not, th refare, feel it necessary to propose any farther proceedings on this subject. The Earl of I. iv La pone said, that reasons which had induced nisters to give up these Orders were not necessary to be stated in thi.t place, and at that time ; and he trusted, that this general repeal would have the eact of bringing back the commerce between the•belligerents to the old channel. The Marquis of LA NsnowN E said, that every word of the Dectira . lion which the Prince Regent had ordered to be published, had his ill. tire approbation ; but no part of the conduct of Ministers withal them to praise or approbation—for they hid reduced his Noble Friend (Fitzwilliarn) to bring the subject of the Orders in eoundir beforc the House, - when they could have received all the infOrMation respect ng them, ig,their own capacities as Ministers. However, if America were not 'Satisfied with this absolute rev:lca:ion,. no one would he core • reany to stand up for the ungoubted maritime rieht of t h is country than he should. He concluded by Moving—" That an humble Ad. dress be presented to the Prince Regent, that he would he pleased to lay before the House a Copy of the Declaration revoking the Orders 'in Council."=-The motion was carded, xem. tits.—Adjourned. THIORSDAY, JUNE J. The Banbury Peerage Claim occupied the attention of their Lord ships at some length. . • Lords F.r.t.F.Neeßouen, and Ei.nom, an:l the Duke of Noitrotx, expressed a firm opinion.; that the present claimant had not In' 'e Plod his right's to the title. , Further proceedings were posti,:unc.l till Thursday. Earl ST Ari HOPE fixed the second reading of his Hill relative to Dis - for Friday the ad of July, and moved, that the Lords be sum moned for that day, which was ordered.—Adjourncd. FRIDAY, juNt 26. CURATES' BILL. The Earl of HAaanwny stated, that in consequence of the rulop prehens:ons that prevailed in regard to the Curates' Bill, he was dis• posed, though reluctantly, to give it up for the present Session. an He sh-ould propose sonic amendments on Wednesday or Thursday, d the Bill might go out to the country as that of the proposer, merely leaving such amendments as other Lords might suggest for considera tion next Se.: ion. It had nevt.tr been in contemplation to affect the liOnzs of present incumbents. After a ti:w words from the Archbishop of CANTERRIIRy, the Bishop of LoNoosr ' and Ike LORD CIIANCELLOR, Lord tiarrowl proposal %vat , agreed to.— A djout ned . iIOUSE OF COMMONS. MONDAY, JUNE 22. ROMAN CATHOLICS. Mr. CANNING rose to bring forward his motion respecting the p.re 'sentstate.of!.the. Ronan Cada°lie subjects in Ireland. Noon wislung to recur to past dissentions and animosities, or to touch u p telligence just received, he should keep from the view of the Howe all irritating and inflammatory language. He app rehended the sub jects of our state were all entitled to the same political privilege‹.—. conceived it to be highly desirable, engaged as we were in a fl °`• arduous contest, to avail ourselves of the whole s tren g th of the em' pire, by conciliating our Catholic brethren ; anti he thought it %"' ~ _ JUNE qw