The National Register. — London, England, 1811-07-14 00:00:00

MARRIED. At St. George's, Hanover-square, Lord Viscount Hawarden, to Jre, the youngest daughter of Patrick Csaufurd Bruce, Esq. of Glenelg, and Upper Grosvenor-street. Oil Monday last, at Water Newton, the Rev. Payn Edmunds, Rector of Theddlethorpe, in the county of Lincoln, to Miss Rich4rdson, daughter of the I,tte John Richardson, Esq. ®f Cortmel, in Lancashire, and niece to the Right Hon. the Eaa of Lindsey. DIED. On Sunday last, aged 79, Peter Garforth, Esq. of Skipton, Yorshire. flying without issue, he has bequeathed the bulk of his large property to his two grand-children, the son and daughter of the late Peter Garforth, jun. Esq. of Castlefield. At Beverly, in Yorkshire, aged 68, after a short illness, T. Dickon, Esq. Senior Alderman of that Corporation. PRICE OF STOCKS. Bank Stock 233 234 S per Cent. Reduced 62 iii 3 per Cent. Consols SI if 2 If 4 per Cent. Consols 7Bli S per Cent. Navy Annuities 93 41 it Ornnium ski 2 die. Coniols for Open. 63ii London : Printed and Edited by E. ROCHE, and Published by JOHN FI:.HER, No 5, Pickett-street, Strand, near Temple-Bar s , and forwarded by all the Newsmen s the Clerks 9 Rods, auto booksellers throughout theUsited Kingdom, fret of restage, iota Ots goods? at Ns. a 44, per quarter. 0 4 4 4.16 COURT OF EXCHEQUER, hr.? ii. maroal TilL LORD? CUM' DAAQtr• PROPERTY ACT. .. .. the floor towards their mistress's bed, and iminediately tbt bed Save a-crash, and heard a noise for about twenty :Wastes, so as to leave them little doubt of the fact. They watched for his sivarture, but could not ascertain when or by what means he contrived to escape. Early the next morning the servant boy pet a ladder to the window of the china-closet, but could see nothing more than a chair in it, which had been missed from ti.e lady's chambeothe preceding day. On that day Mrs. Moore discharged the cook-maid from her service, and shortly after these facts were developed to the unfortunate husband; the consequence of which was, th e immediate dismissal of the de fendant from his stewardship, and the commencement of the present action. Lord Henry Fitzroy, Colonel Rushbrooke, and some of the domestics spoke to the terms of affection and connubial happi nem.; upon which these parties had previously lived together, but it came out upon the cross cxamination of the latter, that ;or tke last three years they had frequent bickerings and warm disputes, and some friends in the neighbourhood were applied to conciliate between the parties. It also appeared that they had kept separate beds for some time previously, nor was there proof of any extraordinary acts of seduction on the part of the Defendant. Mr. Park , in an ab'e address to the Jury oh behalf of the de fend; ut, urged the incredibility of the witnesses who spoke to the act .f adultery and the improbability of their stars, and in tniiioition of damages, supposing the Jury sholild And th fact of adultery, he urged the youth and inexperiehee oftifioderend ant, the bad te-ins on which the parties lived, an 1 theVlitidoned wantonness of the lady. Lord ELIANBOROUGH, in summing up the evict.' Jury, severely animadverted upon the briaohef the serf:l,m towards his master; at the same tirn . e... 4 , fit) eon.ider what damage any than coOlitonscainni siciety of such a woman. The Jury, after a short consultation, found a verdict foi the Piaii.tiff—Damages 501. . . .- • • .• er:wibt, hOco . -•by. . CAUTION TO BROKERS ON DISTRESSES FOR RENT. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL V. JOSEPH DALES. This wag an information filed by the Attorney-General at the instance of his Majesty's Commissioners for the Affairs of Taxes, against the defendant, Joseph Dales, a broker, for the penalty of 801. ircurred by his having, in making a distress for refit due to one. Henry Clark Granger, the landlord, refused to allow Jo seph Walden, the tenant, the sum of 11. Bs. being the landlord's property-tax, charged on, and pain by Walden, for two small tenements in Upper Thames-street and Elbow-lane. Mr. Dennery,the Counsel for the Crown, having proceeded to state the facts in support of the prosecution— The defendant, by his Counsel, observed, that he was con vinced. of Li 3 c rror, and that he had not any defence to offer in mitigation, except that he acted under the express direction of the landlord,Granger, by whom he was employed to distrain fos rent, and who is not now to be found.—Verdict for the Crown. On Friday, in the Court of Chancer y , in the ease of Morris v. Colman, Proprietors of the Haymarket Theatre, Sir Samuel Romilly moved for an injunction to prevent the defendant from engaging other performers than those already engaged. Mr. Hart obj. cted to the motion, as the defendant had not an oppor tunity of answering the plaintiff's affidavit, and trusted that his Lordship would allow it to lay over until the next Seal. The Lord Chancellor observed, he would rot object to its remaining ever, on condition that in the intermediate time, the defendant should not engage any performer. This was assented to by I‘lr. Hart. - . On Thursday, in the Court of Common Pleas, Mr. Fuller, 2 , ..(W5..-cary, of Piccadilly, obtained a verdict of 75001. against Sir Jam e 3 'Montgomery, Bart. Edward B. Douglas, and Wm. Murray, Esqrs. _Executors of the late Duke of Queensberry, for his attendanqe on his Grace for seven years and a half, during which time. he had made him 9340 visits. The action was brought for 10,0001. OLD BAILEY. On Wednesday these Sessions commenced. No trial of any importance took place until Friday, when John Francs was indicted for feloniously forging and uttering as true, knowing it.to be forged, a certain order for the payment of 151. purporting to be the order of one James Cooke, jun. on Messrs. Praed and Co. , with intent to deft and Jemima 'Ware. Ann Ware deposed that she lived with her mother-in-law, Jemima Ware, in Sydney-street, Croswell-street road, and that on the 15th of August 1808 the prisoner came to lodge in their house, in the name of James Cooke. On the githot September, in the same year, he called witness into his room, and asked her if she thought she could procure for him cash fur a draft of 121. she said she would c deavour so to do, and he immediately wrote a draft for that sum, and addressed it to Messrs. Praed and Co. which she took to a public-house in the neighbourhood, but was unable to procure the amount. On her return horns she told her mother-in-law what the prisoner wanted, upon which she said she had a 151. Bank-note in her possession. which the prisoner might have for the draft, provided he would give her the difference. Witness then returned to the prisoner, and hich he expressed Terence he what GS se another of Erigland be draft in Haynes, to initials upon it. returned # Prat d and Qo,. this . in ti=4. from het v • brit:Ube to dicrivritit there will be no went down ta„ white conversing prisoner went out, saying return to tea. He did not, liiewever. return on that night AO. at any other time, and the ensuing morning Haynes returned again with the draft, on which was written, by one of the °elks in the house of Praeci and Co. 14 the drawer not known here." Witness did not see the priso• er from *hat time until the month of June last, when she saw hin: in custody at Flattetnarden Office, where he confessed tie:: his name was John Frauds, and tibt Cooke. These facts were corroborated by several witnesses. On the prisuuer being called on for his defence ; said he had received the 151. on account of the first draft for IM. which he had drawn, and which had been de aroyed, and not for that up on which the present prosecution was founded. He did not produce any witnesses to character. SirALLAN CYAMaaE having summed up the evidence with great perspicuity, the Jury returned a verdict of Guilty— , Diaz& told him the proposition of her mother, at which he e; some satisfaction, and said if it would make no differ would draw a dr aft' for the whole sun—to which wil ceded, and the priAoner tore the first draft, and wrote for 151. in return for which be received the 1.51. Bank of Note. During the same evening witness delivered the question by her es_dtit-e, to a man named Hs whom aim. vs* „yrevioydr placing her initials Ift A abort flaytiechaereceissa the draft he n 411 4 7 1 1 1 .410 - *Cilia4 o o. dieThouse of Prac d itt name" .140.' 'Mattoon, on receiving 10-4'4nl, retuitteAlppop , tabor him .the ref tron tirade by Haynes.' b!.tndk the draft ti and on reading it said, fee my mistake; I have fors place the ward junior after my hornet" and he then c that word, and returned it to witties. i itayinc," there w objection to paying it DOW " Wi t ness then went Haynesond again gave hum the draft, ant white co with him the prisoner went out, saying he should retun ,