The National Register. — London, England, 1815-06-04 00:00:00

'IONE 4. ci.yrtairity can !piously shave of the wound. that every par (Linter may be The Trlonte twilling done On the On Thvorce clauses which •ud prohibit I A long debt borough awl t the groom' the nt rescue! y, and bib ntotioti.---/A The Earl 01 passed. Fad GREY (flonoinotin 01 the Petition I the Noble E see l ueittly font It teas nude neat.—The Mr. Serjean for the puttiie 11; , tio laittls an, ct M;dialesex Sir IL PART thousand Briti tie Taus pecul to lie on the t Sir H. PAR pmeeedings 01 lead (row th It •ronet prove the Journals n policy and jr decision WWI c take the Catlit oi . the 11..ttv qualil * l l6i/q.t. labuti plc of etnancit left to the I boil pie into active tention, to go this subject w contend that i N' their Eisbni really existed /Waving, .‘ die purpose 01 itttlitiatt gir J. C. H *ll Ili% former tiou whielt pt Ow State. Mr. Yoftho the House wo would to imp 'Co one uusui THE NATIONAL remain that may occamor future solicitude, lie will pre. off the surface, and cut away the jagged or other parts By this method t , f purific irioti, it cannot be doubted Article of poison, anti consequently, that every cathe of be effectually removed IMPERIAL PARLIAMENT. HOUSE OF LORDS. met bosh TUESDAY and WEDNESDAY, but there W2l of importance. THURSDAY. JUNI 1. Order of the Day for the consideration of Lord Rosebery's 'l, the Earl of LAUD' 121).1LE moved to ItelVC out the reduce the Countess of Roseber's marriarzesettlemceit n►arriage between that Lady and Sir H. Mildmity. 'ate ensiled on the question, during which Lord Ellen•. the Archbishop of Casiterhuty opposid the ►notion, on That the morals of society rendeted floor enactments id Lord Lauderdale ulti►uately v►at induced to withdraw Adjourned. FRIDAY, JUNE t. of Roseberry's divorce Bill was read a third rim*, and ROMAN CATHOTIC PETITTON. rose to withdr,w the ?notion, gine!) by a Noble Lord ire) for surnnioning thr House on a motion rerpretiii2 from the Catholics of Irelan , l. He was sorry to sky Earl was so ill that he was contint d to his bed, and con• '?edit 'tnpossible to bring it forword. ierstood that it was to come on, on Tuesday or Tuesday House then adjourned to Mundq, HOUSE OF C01111("3. TUEIDAY, MAY M. int On.dovr obtained leave to bring in a Rill to provide registering of all conveyance* of, and ineelsonrieneep: Lod matey thron4hoettValid, except in the comities and York, %here such provision %vas already existing. CATKOLIC QUESTION. :NET.T. presented a petition, signed by upward 4 of silt Catholics, praying for an unconditional repeal of peculiarly affecting the Roman Catholic subjects,—Ordered table. :NELL then rose, and moved than an extract of the of the last Parliament, upon the Catholic question. he the Journals, which being complied with, the lion. in:weeded to say, that he had wished to have the texracts of read, to Whew the progress which this grand torsi inn of justice had lately miler. In the last Parliament a come to by a great majority, that it was definable to lobe claims into CollAileilitioo, and consequently st vote declared, that it was desirable to remove the civil and dications under which his Niiijesty's Roman (701tatic aired. He was therefore entitled to Pay , that the pritici ipation of was distinctly reenguised.antrit was therefore ottse only to discuss the details, and to carry that prinei ive effect. It was neither memory, nor was it his in go over the argtiments wide!' hod been before target/ upon with ao ;midi eloquence by Mr. Grattan, but lie would A if the Catholics anlnnittril to a Feta on the nomination they would acknowledge that ground of suspicion against them. l'he Hon. /4aronet conc:refted with rhat this Home do resolve itself into a Committee for "t taking into considering the laws attesting his Majesty's subject..'' , IPPIALEY spoke at length against the motion. renewing tr objections to it. mid parlicolarly oppirong the resolit• proposed to throw open to Catholics all the Offices of ate followed also in opposition to the motion. He trnsted would Hot cohsont to going into a Committee, in which it yossible to arrive at any satisfactory conehision. There trmouutable Objet.tigii it Ilia miud ; viz. that it had net R: yet been aseertained. even though the was the Court of Rome wowldeonsent from any information on this point. that in consequence of the dis. stotions between the English and Irish Catholics, there were persmaw intriguing at this moment in Rowe to prevent the Pope films giving aey decided opinion. Mr. KNox eras favourable to the measore of emancipation. Ile wished and voted ti►r an adjostment on these claims on the last dis. cession, when there was a disposition among the Irish Catholics to satisfy and conciliate the Protestants. But that prospect had vanish ed; the rescript of M. Quarientotti was treated with reprobation.— even the pope was assailed and resisted, and his opinion was con temptitoosly rejected. when it no longer served the purposes of those who are hostile to a Veto. The Catholic- of lie:and were now under a most degrading, and disgraceful domination ; that of persons who agitated this question, merely to keep sedition and di-content alke in the country . ; and who by thair violence and f dIJ, were blasting the hopes of the Catholics and their posterity. Mr. M. FITZGE RA LD was in favour of the motion. Intemperate discossions, and the violence of individuals shook', he contended, have no weight with the House upon this question. Was their mis. conduct to prevent the House from legislating fur those Catholic. whom all admitted to he deSereing of relief? Mr. Sedeaut BEsT said, the House was not to be dictated to by the Catholic body. He saw no good that could possibly arise from going into a Committee, as the Catholics said, if you don't give us what we demand, we will take nothing else- He should therefore oppose the motion. Mr. PoNsosav observed, the House was not hound by the de mands et the Catholics; the question concerned equally the Protest ant as the Catholic ; nor would the indiscretion of individuals justify him ia neglet•ting the community. The Catholics might demand what they pleased, but it was for the Home to decide on what it was expedient to grant. Contrary to the opinion of many 3lenrhers of that House, he out tint altarls notch importance to the securities that hail been demanded, as lie always regarded the measure itself as the great svemily. Mr. PRELR objected to the motion, because he regarded it as dos rogatory to the character of the House, and that it would not con ciliate the Catholics. tic itlinded to the violent language used by Counsellor O'Connell, and other Catholic leadera,'in their dim's sions on the merits of the Bill of AK), and conteades-sniii r t aen would not thank the House for soil partikt repeal of their disaltili. ties, nor for any general repeal either, if it Wee'e coupled willi,any. • provision for the . security of the, Protestant estalalisluneot, Sir J. NEWPORT thought the last speaker had done all in his power to inflame both sides of the Home. The qanation was not for any particular mode of relies but simply tdr going into a Coin snittee. Mr. B. liaTncosT and Mr. BANRES opposed going into a Cons. mince ; Lord BINNING land 1w should vote for it. Lord CasTi.EnEauil said, he bad not changed his opinion on thi: miltieet front the first ; and far as he was inclined to. go, he still telt that nothing could be done, unless such security as the Catholic Church gave to governments in other countrie*. The House ought not to be deterred, even if they were sure what they of ' would tint be met with satisfaction by the Catholics of frelnod. He regretted that such speeches had issued from the Catholic Board, butt this ought not to deter the House from legislating for the Catholics. They ought to place the Catholics in a situation to reap the benefits of the Constitution, without eteablitez them to Hove it. The Noble Lord eulogised the Rt. Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Grattan) and reprobated the temper in %%Inch the measure, which had born taken from that Rt. Hon. Geittleman's hand, had been brought forward by those persons in Ireland of whom be lead spoken. It was an evidence that they were now soliciting for something ferent trout the former uwasure; in short, they were asking for un qualified admission to the Constitution. With this cofivictioll he world vote for going into the Committee, in order I.: 'hew the Catholics the 'tense of the House as to their conduct. Their cause, instead of rising now, was going down hill ; and to approve their conduct would only be to hasten them ou to their own injury. In the Committee it would undoubtedly be necessary to negative the Resolution' ; nor did he tint that the House would be called on to otter any new or modified plates nr propteitioos. Mr. WilitTisoaan corwurred with the Noble Lord, except in one poiot, namely. that it would he sufficient merely to creative the Resolutions. He was of opinion, that the Committee would do aril to substitute something in their stead, even if it should be in opposition to the wishes of the Catholics. Up to this time, he had spoken ou this sabjeet with pleasure, because he felt vhf subject was advancing to success; but ROW RC. clAteCd upon it with gain, •=••••••••v•Adik \ ...,••••• .137 Pupe released, what It to do. Se tar was the Howe 0 •40 1 14--0 4 .