The National Register. — London, England, 1811-02-03 00:00:00

THE NATIONAT, 1-11P/STER. The Lord Cn,tNCFLLOR said, he qid not rise so Much with 2 view to make many 'observations opon . the immediate question before them, for on that subject &I was clear, but he was ex tremely desirous, that he should not again -fie misunderstood.— He should certainly oppose the Amendment of the Noble, Lord ((;renville,) and he would say /hen, ashe had done upon all occasions, that he hoped he had acted with 'a conseientious'in tendon of - doing his duty . ; but above all, be must say, that this was that particular occasion upon which fie ihduld do his per sonal duty to his Sovereign in despite of ill the personal opinions of the whop world. He acted, upon his oath, conscientiously to discharge his duty to his King and. Master ; and take it from what period they might, all the world should not induce him to vote for a shorter period to those limitations than those in. tended by the original clause; but he Should do this more par ttcularly at a time when his duty to • the Public and justice to his Majesty required it. And he begged to impress it upon their Lordships, that it was not forty-eight hours since it was fully impressed upon his mind, that that individual would long live to be, as he has ever been—the benefactor of his people. The Earl of COVEN ray and Marquis of STAFFORD supported the Amendment: • • • Lord GRl:r, in a'n animated and impressive speed!, supported the Amendment which was strongly opposed by Lord Liver pool. The Royal Dukes, GLOUCESTER and KENT, supported it, and after much discussion, the question was then loudly called for, and strangers were ordered to withdraw, when two divi sions took piste. The first on the amendment proposed by Lord Grenville, upon which the numbers were—Contents, 84 ; Proxies, 30,122 ; Non-Contents, t 3 B; Proxies 51, 139; Majo rity aga inst the Amendment, 17. The next division was on the Original 'Clause. The numbers were—Contents, 88; Proxies, .si, 139; Non-Contents, Sti; Proxies, 38, 124; Majority in fa vour, 15. : .ord LivEliPooL then moved, that the. Amendment which ' ' been made in tie Committee in the Claute respecting the Sehold, should be omitted, and that the Clause, in its origi ! „lal forth, should be substituted .- A division then took place, tor the Amendment 86, Proxies 51,137 ; Against it 83, Proxies 48, 121 Majority for Ministers 16. Lord CLANCARTY then proposed an Amendment concerning the Queen's Household, which was carried in favour of Mi nisters by a majority of five. Upon the Clause respecting the Queen's Council, Lord GRENVILLE moved that the Archbishop be one. . of Armagh This was opposed by Lord Liverpool, on the ground of the in convenience which the local ituation, and the other avocations of that Prelate, must occasion. Upon the Votir..n being put, the numbers were, for the Mo tion 81 ; ...Anst it, 85 ; Majority for Ministers, 4. AN no pk:, after an animated speech in which he sin cerety" tared the conduct of Ministers throughout, but es pecialli n their arrangements c: . ncerning the Regency, moved that the Duke of Bedford's name be inserted among those who were appointed as the Queen's Council. 'l'he Motion; however, was negatived - without a division. Upon the return of strangers to the Bar, Lord Grey was corn ildining ,that no arguments had been used on the part of Ministers, but that every proposition was carried by mere vote. Lord LAUDERDAI E then proposed an Atnendment, which was lost without a division, when the House adjourned. ~, 4.1 TUZSDAY, JAN. 29. Strangers were excluded for a short time, on some question of Privilege, relative to an Irish Peerage. .; Immediately on the Houie proceeding to public business th:o• Regency Bill was read a third time, passed and sent to the dom.! mons, .wie,h a Message, detiring their concurrence in the A mendments. The./ifriceedings in the. Ecclesiastical Court in Taunton's Di voree,- Were presented at the Bar, and the Pivurceßill read first time. Adjourned till this day, at ten o'clock, when their Lordships go in yrticussiule to*Wesuninstef Abbey. TKVASDAY, JAN. 31. After transacting some private busineis, strangers were ex cluded, in consegnence of a matter of Privilege being under 21ivestigatinn. A Dowager Peeress of Ireland having been ar r-sted, an Attorney and a Sheriff's Officer, concerned in the 4rreft, were brought in custody to the bar, to answer for the breach of privilege. After a long investigation, they were or dkaed to-be discharged, paying their fees. . • FRIDAY, FEB. 1... THE REGENCY Mr. LONG, attended by several Members from the House bt Commons, brought up the Regency Bill with the" itnierdznents, which was agreed to. Lord Livstit tool. then said, that it was now the . setiaon • tbt their Lordshios to adopt a Resoiutionfor putting the Great St-al to a Commission for passing the Regency . Bill, and for .th4t-put , - pose he should then lay the Resolution on the table, which. he should move to he taken into considerations tomorrow, vviten* if no objections leading to any discussion should arise, he sl.hbuli then move that it be agreed to. If, on the contrary, ariy debutO should occur respecting it, he should think it his duty to poster pone its further consideration to Monday next. Lord Rossim sr considered this mode sof proceeding nothing more than a mere contrivance to create deli*. • • • Lord DERBY elpreged himself of the same opinion. Lord ELLENuottouott was desirous to. be informed' by the Noble Secretary of State what their Lordships were to undo - - stand by that length of discussion, upon which depended the bringing forward his motion to-morrow or Monday I -Objec tions might be made, and observations occur, without prologg ing discussion to any inconvenient rime. .Lord Lives root. observed, that it was difficult to answci with precision the question put by the Noble and Learned Lord. Objections or observations, which might lead to what Was gee nerally understood by a protracted debate, were what he had in coitemplation, when he suggested the conditional emiedienefof deferring his motion to Monday. lt nuts ttie,o agreed, that the form of the Conunission ' as presented hy Liverpool, sheold lie on the table, after which the House adjournatolo-rnorrow. aftwalem ' ' SATURDAY; Fri. 2. Their I ,ordships having met about five o'clock, Lord Livr a POOL rose, pursuant to the notice he gave list night, and moved, that t he Draft of the Commission for pasting the Regency Bill should be read. The Commission being then read by the Clerk, Lord HOLLAND could not pass by any opportunity of enter— ing his most solemn protest against the whole of'this proceeding, by which a delay of upwards of three mouths had taken place, and the country been left without an Executive, he would al most say, an efficient Government. He again prOtOsted against the whole proceedingos contrary to the analogy of the Consti. tution, and tothe Statute Law of the land. He denied,. that there was any precedent whatever for the preient mode of pro ceeding, while there were various precedents for adviag lin opposite and more easy course ; and, in his opinion, thoie who advised the affixing qt` the Great Seal to such a Comnsiisioo, were amenable to the Law, until a Bill of Lndetnnity shoulalAe passed. 't (3 , •.., • Earl GREY entirely coincided in the sentiments: of his Isloi7.le Friend. He again begged leave to enter his protest against lite whole of the proceedings, but Pima. reserve himself upon the. question of the legality of affixing the Great Seal. to this Com mission, and of the persons concerned therein, .which he consi dered a direct violation of the Constitution,. and those persons amenable to the laws of the land, until they should be iudem nified. Lord Livrit root. replied, that without trespassing upon their Lordships time, he should only obs-rve, that this proceeding was found to be the nearest approximating to the Constitution of the country, and to the principle and spiritef that Constitu tion, and following up those precedents which had descended to us from our ancestors. • Lord HOLLAND explained. ~ : .4 1 ' • 'll Lord R DEsn AL r observed that the -Noble Lords .opposite,n denied that there was any precedent of the present prLiceeding ;... but, he would call their Lordships•recollection to the reign of henry V I. when the precedent was completein all its puints...i. After a few words front Lord HOLLAND, in explanatiou r the,l Motion was agreed to. ii Lord ',lyre root. then moved that the latillt be filled up with the words " the Sth of February," and that a Message be sent • i to the House of Commons, requiring a conference therasu;.i t which was agreed to, and the. House adjourned to biontiamli.M. • • iefl4,l • •• noust i pf.cpm qtagi I,om • -T4-00.----f,!•! , . e s,ctit'atit.os.litski btu; MoNtiv,istt.4.4Pite-onvi lied 43144 y, sin r--- :.1 n;iti Several priv ate for Luc lovir* Widielifitar o vp, read, and referred to Comntitteesp‘ v 16D% I • Sir J. GRAHAM presented* petisioakom the pad4phismitat t Mary-le-bone, praying leave to bring isa Bill for Alse lahleies of 7!. a Church in that parish. Referred tae a Committee, to condor:10 of the contonte thereof. .:yi "1. 11 eiw b. 02