Star. — London, England, 1814-04-26 00:00:00

- - --, RLLibil. , 'N; ARr PROCEEDiNCS. HOME OF LORDS, APRIL el, Ti the appeal from the English Chancery, WOlan v. lats. Sir S. ItostiLtir and Mr. I.x.scit were heard-Sr App. ilatit THr. FasstANque and Mr. Huai . fur Respondetit. Judgment on ‘Vednestlas. it the appeal Warner v. Cunnirzhante Mr. Luxcu was heard fo" Appellant.. Furtjser hearing on. Wednesday. The Cochineal hill was eNnitnittedond reporiedi . and uve r.ll Roa , ; Jnel inelusure Bills were brought up tram the Cont anon. by Sir JAW/ GR A HAM ' Mr. 1.4 Lott, and untrro. A Person from the court of Exchequer, in Scotland, present ed a Writ of Error. The CHANCELLOR gave notice, that as Wednesday was the tirsi d y el Term, the House would not meet for judicial intaiocii till two o'clock.—Adjourned. - HOUSE OF COMMONS. A new Writ was ordered for the County of Rutland, Al: Noel. having acoepted the Chiltern Hundreds. Mr. FOSTER presented a Petition from the Catholics of the County of Louth. Lord A. HAMILTON presented a Petition from Gla.4;ow, against &seeing the Corn Laws. Committee appointed for next Wednesday on the Hop• pocket Act. Mr. HORNER presented a Petition from kugustus Cove, complaining of oppression and injury front the Grand Junc.lon, qanal Company. The Colonial Bill ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. The LORD ADVOCATE gave notice of a Bill to-morrow, k respecting Debtori and Creditors in Scotland. sir H. MILDMAY wished to know what information Go vernment had received respecting cenain transactions of Gover nor Ainslie in Dominica and Grenada; particularly regarding a Proclamation said to have been Issued by him in the former, in hich the runaway slaves were threatened, in the event of not returning, with the destruction of their wives and children? Mr. GOULBURN said, he saw the paragraph in a publica tion respecting the Proclamation. He consulted the head of his Office (Lord Bathurst), and the Governor had been written to for information on the subject. Sir H. MILDMAY alludel to the Memorial of the Free Peoile of Colour in Grenada, and wished to know what steps Govennm nt 144 taken on that matter? • Mr. GOU LBUlt N said empiries had been directed: he should not object to a anode for information. The moment the pa ragraph alinut D ny ominica s was seen, the Proclamation alluded to was written for. - Sir H. MILDMAY moved for the Grenada Memorial from the Free People rift olour, and the other papers relating thereto. Ordered. He then desired to know, whether Governor Ainslie was appointed to Dominica after the receiving of the Menu:nig from Grenada? Mr. GOULBURN said, he bad rewired his appointment long prior to that. CORN LAWS. - Lard A. HAMILTON wit:led to know what rno2e was in tended to be pursued in the proposed pre...ldings on the Corn Law? Sir H. PARNELL said his intention was to move a Com mittee, and therein to propose certain resolutions: after that, to introduce a Bill to effect an alteration essentially necessary in the corcumataoces of the country, and different from that which he brought in last session He should propose a lower price to regulate the importation, but such as would nut interfere with the,present course of trade either in grain or bread. He then presented a Petition fur an alteration lu the Corn Laws from ueehs County, Ireland. DRoITS OF ADMIRALTY. The Hop. Captain BEN 'JET moSed for an account of ad vaoces from the Droits, fbr the last three years. He understood that some advance as to the Royal Family had been repaid . but wished to ascertain the facts. At the desire of the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, I the subject was postponed till to-morrow. • Mr. BERME CI then moved for a return of the Artillery and the iionn Artillery apd Drivers in lune 25, and December tts, 1813, stating the numbers at home and abroad; of the Engi neers and Artificers, and Sappers and Miners, distinguishing those enlisted for years, and for life; of the recrui• s, with the same distinction; of the Officers of the A.:niy, specifying those who were oa balf-pay. Ordered. Silt. LB MARCHANT. Mr. A. BROWNE observed that this Gentleman had been appoielvd to an important aim in Antigua ; but circumstances had appeared which otaisectedhis name with a late transaction, an WiiirJa there could be but OM opinion. He desired to know whether Government had taken any notice of the matter; or Whether Mr. Le Marehmt was to be permitted to go out to Antigm, ` adder the Klima which the circumstances must throw wpm Mal I GOULIURN said that Government had intimated to Mr. Le Marelsest, thit he Mould not leave the country on his appal's:went midi proper enquiry had been made and sufficient later:nada received en the subject. BANE OE ENGLAND. Mr. TIERNEY observed that it was possible a definitive treaty of Peace might be concluded soon: He wanted therefor t to he informed what course Government meant to p ursue re ' *pectins the Bank, which, as matters stood, was to recommence cash payment* six months alter the conclusion of peace. Was it 'inward so, or that the restrictions should continue six months longer ? If the last, did the Chancellor of the Exchequer mean to propose a Select Committee of the House of Commons to cu lotte into the circumstances, and report thereon ? Eke CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER could not an swer such a premature string of questions. A treaty of peace might be soon concluded; and it was probable that Governmeoti might not call on the Bank to resume cash payments at the gibs ration of six months. partkular steps would be taken be could not then soy. Mr. 'IIERNEY said, his question was merely whether, If the restriction was to condone, it was judged expedient, as due to *oust, to propose aSelectConiznittee to enquire and report? might be called premature t but the matter might come on y late in the :cause : be was.not so impertinent as to ask specifically what was to be done, but what course was intended n be posited ittericting the Bank of England ? CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said that he was at all papered to sober that quatiou. • POINTING. Lord A. HAMILTON presented a Petition from Andrew puasan, Prints* to the Uoiversity of Glasgow, which the Noble lord described so be an easy.: to a thaw advanced in a Pet!- , KWIC tints Owe preseated by id Honourable Gentleman on ~se other side. In this latter Petition it was all dged tt.at the Valves &ay of Glasgow improperly availed hod of its privileges od exemption from certain races, to undersell the London ate th-ir own gasket. Of this allegation the preseut Petitioner soroptained as 11 just and untrue. Mr. ROblr said, that be received the Petition alluded to by the Nolte Lord how respectable Eoularliers in London, but ,chat be tension would not have presented it had he conceived • to touts n those charges of hand and perjury Agliust the Uni versities of Scotland to wines the Noble Lord had alltded. He ?as led to consider it merely as a complaint on the part of the )etit ot.er, that lb. tkuttish Universities had made some use of their privileges that was not warranted by law ; but he did not ice! is mstlf re - possible fur the troth ids* Petition, nor could, any M.mber presenting.* Petitiosi be deemed responsible. lord A. HAMILTON observed, that it was the duty of the Right Honourable Gei.tkatan to easmint ate Petition beat presented it; etitiou was ordered to lie on the table t • • coutturrios or "pop. The A;Oit Hon. C. YORKE said that the altera lion of an Ancient law of the lama, as old as the laws af landed property since the Norman tr - ncluest, ought slot to he Adnpted, without the strongest wounds,' Other on account of its disadvantages. or o f the ad vaotagcs likely t 4 accrue from such a change, His pbje.ttoos were pm so strong against some parts of pia ggaisisl othas, yet the least objectionable part was ! in his mind s disadvaiitageous to landed prripert y I and int,lyed the escheat to the Lordof the Matipr. But the mane "Ott *as what related to }dig:, Tucson, Apd the higher trlopies. corruption gj blood wag tai as ruui.h autiquity as that sucTession of the oldest :tit ; ait4 the oott.sitcrertsjon of the brother by 444-41 , 44. The 4 141mion wO 4 therefore ! of a • could c Mr. k that re e strii i in: I very la f eyed& elo go b. i ...e 'lle !we at Lot puma l A) rd {! , 'ion to k r the of Ville' sod t: % tars o comp' Mi tthe 11 Athos I • it to versii seals I petit ) attic kel i L }tie #c 1 k 1 t tip' af Am fitl Va pb; P 4 I - ~. t I , t V t; 0 serious nature. He was far from convinced by the Learned Gentleman, to-whom he had attended with much respect. • His chief 4eason seemed to be the ineonveniencies attending the arrangement of pro perty in the view of conveyances, on account of old attaints. He observed, that he - had not laid stress upon the argument, which he (Mr. Yorke) thought an exploded one, of the hardship and injustice of making children suffer for parents' crimes. If we were now enacting . a law to make children suffer in their liberty, or their own acquisitions, for a father's treasons, we might be fairly called unjust. That, however, was not the case. The question was, wile. then the crime was such as made the present punish ment politic ? As he understood the Learned Gen ' tleman, it rested on the feudal system, and not on its being a part of the punishment, as a penal law. This distinction he could not understand. Ir might be said so ut forfeiture; that it was not punishment, but a consequence of it : —yet it had been considered as much a part of the punishment as death ; and so had corruption of blood. There was no sound distinction. Lord Coke bad stated, that if the wife of the attain'. ed person lost her dower, and their children their ho nours and inheritance, it was because it was neces sary to increase the fear of committing crimes that bought such fatal consequences on those who were most-dear to them. Why, then, should the principles of the old law be now altered or departed from ?-; Was there any particular grievance*ow to complain of ? It must appear to every man of candid mind as a slur cast upon the long and benevolent reign of our present Sovereign, to say that there was now any, particular occasion to introduce such an alteration.— ,After i the ref olutions in America and Frame, and the rebellion in Ireland, had set the minds of many men adrift, he did not think it a proper time to relax the severity of the law. in cases of high treason. When lewae recollected too, that both in this country and . .such barbarous murders had lately been committed As had been unknown and unparalleled for the last 150 years, he did not think it a time to dimi nish the punishment of mu: der. As to treason, al though he hoped that late events would display more conspicuously the excellence of our constitution, yet we were tuna() expect a'goiden age to take place int nicliately, or suppose that vie were living in Arca dia. When he conceived the circumstances which might arise from our superabundant population, he 'thought it possible that some men might yet be found to entertain the idea of such crimes, and that the exist ing punishment might have a salutary effect in •re pressiffg them, as persons might, from vanity as well as affection, be deterred from bringing the penalty of corruption of blood on their whole families. He concluded by moving an amendment to the first clause, which went to prevent the operation of the bill extending to cases of high treason, petty treason, and murder. Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH said, he perfectly agreed with the right Hon. Gentleman respecting the antiquity oF the law ; but he seemed to have been in fluenced ia his defence of it more through ia anti quity that from any other motive. It might be as ancient as any other parts of the law of England, and like every ether old institution, it was tainted by the times in which it originated. It was not more ancient than the law of !seine: fortes et dares, and the whole train of those feudal barbarisms. He could not un derstand what was meant by cages of necessity being said to exist fcr the continuance of this old law any more than others which had been repealed. There WAS certainly no other reason for repealing the act which authorised the burning of women, and of per sons called heretics, than that a more enlightened period of society should not be disgraced and stained by such sanguinary laws—there was only this ne cessity, that the eyes an I hearts of the people should not be shucked by witnessing the execution of such barbarities. We were told that his Majesty's reign had been 'signalized by mildness. What inference was to be drawn from this ? Because his Majesty's reign had been humane and lenient, were the House not to catch any of that humanity and lenity, or to give it a legal body and sanction ? This was a very singular interence. For his own part he would nut give a silent vote on the subject so vastly important to the body of Scotch landholders, whom he repre sented, and to Scotland at large. The law propust d to be repealed was totally unknown to the ai:ciela laws of Scotland. Corruption of Blood incases of treason was first made to apply to Scotland, in the seventh year of Queen Anne, and the reasons for it were ably and Lally detailed. by BishOp Burnett, as honest and sincere a man as ever existed. '1 lie law was to expire after the death of the Pretender of that period, on whose behalf an invasion had the year before been attempted : it was only introduced As a temporary act, and every extent of it beyond the period of actual danger, was a breach of faith to Scotland. Yet, in 1743, this provision was again extended for as long as the Pretender should live ; this law then, which was avowed to be only tem porary, was of such a violent and injurious nature ills to be totally unfit for what Lords Somers and !Cocks described to Burnett as good time:. Such 'laws were adapted only to alarming exigencies, and ought to be abolished when the dangers against which they were intende4 to operate, no longer existed. The burthen of the proof that there was a necessity for the old law rested with those who wished to perpetuate it. The rue innovation was made in the 39th of George 111. the year 1799. Those who supported the modern statute, (that of 1799) in his humble opinion, acted against the original inten tion of the Legislature. lie was only anxious to sup port the established law against what he conceived to be an innovation. He held both the law of cor ruption of blood and that of forfeiture, in abhorrence —the latter had found its way into the codes of most nations, the former was peculiar to England, and ',tent to inflict a heavy punishment on the innocent, while it could have no effect on the guilty. if a •man were to imagine a bad Utopia—a place where 'more misery could be known than was experienced an this world, the principle of this law would be, that on which his plan must be founded—that of inflicting the greatest punishment en the innocent, the least on guilt. To suppose that law, like that under the consideration of the Committee, would have the effect of deterring - a man from the commission of a crime; to irnaginealw this law, through which a person un born, might some nifty or a hundred years after the crinainars decease, miss an estate which he might ova:vise have gained, was, M entertain a,ttexpectation. more wit 4 and extravagant by kW ever bow dreamt by the wildest sethistslwhile forming visionary schemes of Government. No stronger case was necessary to shew the impropriety of continuing this law, than that which ad Hon. and Learned Gentleman had 'brought forward ; where through corruption of blond an estate was lost to the children of an officer in his I Majesty's army who had been engaged in suppressing the rebellion, in which his relation was concerned. — .This hardship had been endured to maintain the beau tiful theory that the corrupted blood of a traitor could not be a channel for the transmission of any property. •For this the children of an officer who had devoted his life to the cause of loyalty were to he made beg gars, as if it were not enough that their unfortunate parent should draw his sword against his kinsman, and probably be placed in the distressing situation of unconsciously depriving his relation of life.—(Hear.) Could it be thought that it was no hardship for the children of such an officer to go on their knees to beg that bread which, but for this law, they might have claimed as their right. He did not wish to asperse those through whom the bounty of the Crown was ex erted, but he would despise shit man who did not 'feel it la degradation to be compelled to implore that bounty. To be placed in this situation was revolting to the pride of an Englishman—to those feelings which had made this country what it now is, and shot, he trusted in Goo, it would ever remain. The ,limitations which had been set to the operation of this law, proved that it had been considered as an innova tion on the established system. It had been condemn ed by Lord Somers in 1708, by Lord Hardwicke in 1744, and a time more favourable for its repeal than the prisent could never be expected to arrive. 'At a period when, as had truly been said, all were united in gratitude to Aamictoro Goorfor those stupendous events which had assured our safety and repose, it would be well that they should proceed to abrogate the ancient severity of those laws, which might be re lased—to remove the brand and remnant of civil con vulsion—to. do away that miserable absurdity which only served to furnish a subject for ineectiee and cri ticism, to those who opened cur Statute, ook in order to abuse it. He concluded 14 pronouncing an ani mated eulogy on the conduct of the Emperor Alex ander, -and expressing a hope that the happy change effected through his firmness, would be productive of important domestic reforms, affording as it did the fairest opportunity for attaining them. The SOLICITOR-GEN ERAL ( Mr. Serjeant Shepherd) felt it to be an awful moment in which he first addressed that House. He contended that those great authorities which had bi.en referred to-had not been disposed so take away corruption of blood. This had been assumed, from the limitations as to time set to the operations of the law on that subject in cases of treason. It was, however, to be remem bered, that they had proposed no such lis&tation in cases of felony ; and he though: it wovldbe a great libel upon them to suppose that they were disposed `to shew more indulgence to the traitor than to the felon. In this respect, therefore, the argument of the last speaker completely failed. From a variety of circumstances he contended, it was clear that . this measure had been considered to he one, that it was important to uphold. The law of corruption of blood was very ancient. This in itself was no reason why a law that' was found injurious should not be altered, but he held that the antiquity of a law was good reason' why it should be much considered before it was altered. The law of corruption of blood had been recognised by the Legislature time after time: It had been recog nised in a great variety of statutes, by the exceptions from it which they had been made to contain ; this 'be considered to be almost as strong a recognition to it as re-entering it. It had been recognised beyond all doubt, in the 9:11 of Henry 111. (the Magma Charta of Henry III.), and he hoped the House would pause before they altered that which, founded in common law, had been recognised in Magna Charm, and over and over again, up to our own time—the last period at which it was recognised, be ing about 15 years ago. It might be said that this law did not punish the convicted traitor, but his de scendants. 'They could not but- be sorry that the sins of one should be visited on another ; but know - . ing as they did the' constitution of human nature, knowing that men who neglected all moral duties, careless even of their interests, were sometimes awake 'to what might be the fate of their descendants, such laws became necessary. He would have men absta; from crime, front a semse of duty ; but where this WAS not sufficiently strong, he would borrow aid from their regard for their posterity, and bring their best aff:ct ions (as far as it could be done), to reprove their worst passtons. He %sighed it therefore to continue over the criminal in terrorem, and to protect in parti cular cases his-family by escheat. Sir S. ROMILLY, in reply, complimented the last apeaker on the manner in which his opposition had been given, but he had expected the Learned Gentleman would have thought it necessary to shew the propriety of the punishment. The case ttf the officer who had been mentioned made strongly against the law. On that occasion the estate had been taken from his descendants, because a private individual its skied on the escheat because of a failure of heirs. If this law were necessary, why was it not made the ge neral law of the land ? At present it was not the law of the county of Kent. Why were the murderers of that county entitled to more indulgence then those of any other This, he thought, proved the Solicitor. General was mistaken with respect to the antiquity of the law—but what signiOed its antiquity If the law punished innocence instead of guilt, it mattered not whether it was enacted by one set of barbarians or another. Mr. Justice Blackstone had disapproved ot it. . In the last chapter of his Commentaries, when speaking of the advantages which had flowed from the Revolution, among others he had mentioned this, " that it opened a prospect that corruption of blood would be entirely done away by one general and un distinguishig law." He enlarged on the cruelty and injustice of this statute ; no wish to change the general system of the criminal laws ; but where he thought they might be altered for the better, he should continue to offer those suggestions which he thought would be of service. No time could.be fitter fur work ing such reforms than the present. Europe had lung enough given her attention to scenes of carnage and desolation. A bright prospect now opened before her. la had been said, bethe greatest poet, perhaps, of which this or any other country can boast, that Mewae Hay %imams nee sew renown's than ware' • and at many such triumphs he hoped to be present in that How. Then it wad his hope that vKVKICS would be gained for which shouts of exultation %you) ascend to H ERVEN, uninterrupted by the groans of • the dying now, and the lamentations °vet the dead. ' The Learned Geatlernan had said, the power of the Crown bad not been harshly exercised in modern times. In one instance he (Sir S. Romillyj thought it had ih that case which he had motioned when bringing the subject forward. and %Oriel' be would now repeat. He then restated the cioc of the womaa who was convicted of amurderin 17!47.: An Inquisi tion had been issued from the Crown to tiskr an estate which had belonged to her, after it had hewn purchased by a Mr. North, who paid a full prree for it to another person who bough it under similar cir cumstances. The proprietor fortunately discovered that it was held of a mesne Lord, desired to tra verse. The Crown opposed this, but the Vice-Chan cellor gave permission, and irhad been sent down to the last Assizes, but the trial bad been put off. he be lieved by the Chown. What was men singular in this case was, that the woman convicted of the tam-- • der was the informant in this case. It was on WWI of a person convicted of murder that these proceed ings were instituted on the part of the Crown, and may now be taken from the last purchaser, because it was held this was a wise law. The SOLICITOR GENERAL said, Mr. North hid purchased the estate, perfectly aware of the title set up to it by this woman and her son. He had purchased it, knowing that she could not prosecute on account of corruption of blood, and the Crown had iraerfered to save her and her family from the conse quences of that corruption of blood. This at least he was informed Was the.case. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY thought the Learned Gentleman must have been misinformed. • If such were the circumstances of the case, they' had been kept a secret up to the time at which the subject was publicly discussed in a Court of Justice. Sir J. MACKINTOSH said, the statement of the Solicitor General only Varied the person, the abuse and injustice complained of still remained against the law of Corruption of Blood. It was supported only by a 'letter of Cicato's, which had been proved to be spurious, and by a modern writer on the law of for. • feiture; who• twenty years after had changed his sen. timents on the subject. Mr. YORKE could not agree to the inference that had been drawn from the aliedgecl authority of the author of 64 Considerations on the Law of Forfeiture." Mr. PRESTON observed, that the law of escheat had been introduced by William the Conqueror. One case which might happen had not beet mentioned. It was that of a man who might be convicted of treason and attainted, but afterwards receive a pardon. A.c• cording to the principle of corruption of blood, his children could not inherit his property. Again, sappo. -sing a man in such a case to die with a pardon in his hand, and that be had two children, the one bona before his death, and the other after ; the oldest child dying without issuse, the other could not inherit the property- Mr. LOCKHART supported thd Amendment. The Committee then'decided on the Ansendmast-. For Hie Atneedment, 42....Asatost it , K.—Majority, S. Mr. yOR,KE then moved, as an Amendment, that the crime of high treason should be exempt from the provisions of the 13111. This was agreed to withal; a division. the Amendment, that Petty Treason should also be exempted from its enactments, HUM CIHICINIUS. • ensui.d. in which Mr. BATHURST and Mr. W. SMITH participated, alter whicuthe Committee 4 vided, and the Amendment was carried. The Bill was ordered to be reported. HIGH TREASON PUNISHL INT mu. The House having resolved itself into aCommitteo on this Bill— ' - Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY moved that that part of the punishment which. ordered .that the bbely of the ci iminal should. be dragged on a hurdle— Mr. YORKE & alter a few words in a low tone s moved as an amendment that the words" afterwards beheaded" stand part of the Bill. Sir S. ROMILLY thought that the effect of exhibiting such a shocking spectacle to the people would be very pernicious. The amendment was then carried. Mr. WHITBREAL (on the other clans, of the Act being read) could not help expressing his stir. • prise at his Hon. and Learned Friend making no objection to the disgusting words of the last clause. For himself, he protested agtinst it. Mr. YORKE could not help noticing the espies. sive tenderness of the Hon. Gentleman to the cnmi. nals, without any notice of the atrocious nature of the offence, or of the number of sufferers that there might be in effecting the horrible purposes of the criminal. Hear, hear, hear.) Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY repelled with indig. nation the imputation of the Right Hon. Gentleman, that all the mercy on that side of the House was re served for criminals without any sense of the atrocity of their crimes. He would have the Right Floe. Gentleinan know, that •in all the alterations in the laws of the country which he (Sir S. Romilly) pea posed, his only object was the prevention of trims. Mr. YORKE denied having any intention of' line pining to the Hon. and Learned Gentleman .Who had just spoken, any such feeling as he had dis. avowt.i. He paid some high compliments to the chatacter and abilities of the Hot. and Learned Gen tleman, to whom he had not alluded, itt those words of which he had taken notice. - Me. WHITBREAD could not belt again ex pressing his disgust at the enactment. the Disgust. lug spectacle now contended tor was of a piece with the judgment which could order the dead body of Will.ams, during the late horrid murders, to be car ried about. by svay, as it was said, of appeasing the public. The public were not in that case sh - cked with any horrid exhibition beyond the death:ot the cnminais. A few words followed from Mr. YORE% Mr. BA THURST. and Mr. W. Smarm, aftet which the Report of the Committee was ordered tie be received. The Crown Land Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be committed. The Simple Contract Debt was read a second time, on the moti.iu of Sir S. ROJAILLY, Mr. Stricant IIEkT having notified his intention of oppor t ing tile Bill, it was agreed that the denote should take place on the motion for its Committee in Friday tutu. t o ad PALMERSI'ON presented a return of the effective strength of the Militia and Regular Force:. OpicTed lobe of the table,—Adjovrned. • Ica COPEWMAO/ By private letters and lowing highly interesting After Lientenatit•Colo the 18th of Jannary from Christian Frederick the n with Sweden, the Prince of the Chamberlain, Mr. tiania, assembled there th civil; military, and e ccii professors, merchantt, a to regulate tie finances o on the 28th of January. the Treaty of Peace, at opinion that the people c defend their primeval ii: mands of Sweden t The the affiratatire, and earn remain at the head of ti same time resolved on gent of Norway* The 1 to the frontiers, then to 1 mountains to Troodnjen Niwth. The people thro with their wives and chi Dooreteld, and the deep “ We will conquer or d and Thou shalt not lent tom, the people always Su the journey continue when the Prince arrive , able for the circumsiane under Sinclair fell the mountaineers, so that feat was not left alive), marble pillar set up in and read the inscription Lad. 44 Woe to every No boil in his veins when went! „ and called to t' your forefathers, sAcrifii the tiered cause of you iwered by a thousand! ding drnhitude. Thus he entered Dm and'alighted Krogh, a men (4 8U y considerable inhabitant entertainment; and th could not be present at ht, how in at the end of the eni ial acclamations drank as Reg Fut; From thi dpi to become the cap four day t, to after emoted Co:int* F With the news of the -- - with dte Danish and trince invited them u the mc*t conbiderale dechoed tpeakitig of dinner Avis not the prc The next day all th non fired. The town in the streeta,t ad Pi pprrrocipal CSora. t *larked nothing till ti they waived jost at tb iirP kneeling down bi the ()AO) as Regent. them, if they had bee answering !n the star answers: the Swe parted ; and on the clam.rtions nt the P Officers, the Arthy Lir Letter, Ind the A to All Lurope. The funeral dirge playln wegr.in colr.art (A with a white erns.) Lions of j.y. ACa E= was appnir AnEt.r. Pri others. Soon after triers, where 32.000 ire slid to have aim not authenticated. to take the oath; crews of an the shit been teteited from ligaments of tern I petted ; ' stony thii rived. and two eons ports on theft ant A contideralgie cc mu nition, e^sigited ed. whether by arcii It it said, that English Princess; o the daughter of tlu abaft sixteen yeirs An Assembly of yoked for the 10th held in the open air stotativeCouttituti We cannot help prise of . Mr. 14*, Lottery for these s Adventurers with chances which the tei ins, we unsierst; chasers of Shares ;:f Twelfth Cake : :.zers one of the b inaparte we ha , 1:e has divided nu keeper iu London In consequence by the Public to 1 Shares in the pre rtheir most g ends that they en the present occ pital Prize:as thi to divide among them with their c the attention of e be bad at Hong; , . I 'll. L