Star. — London, England, 1817-12-20 00:00:00

et ortg. an the hooks of Moses were. nothing but o pposes." Who could say th a t t hi s was decent? Mr Hotta said. he would stake his credit with the ' d ry, .hat the remaining part was perfectly innocent, paor.ti, and even pious, and was necessary to abew the idiport of the rest. Lord EtLerisonoucor said, that at the defendant's fi nest intreaty he would permit it to be read. ltlr. Hess went on— " Thus, in this battkereyal, As nate would take doilial, The d.inse for whom they strew% sir, Could neither of than love, sir, Since all had given ollence, Ito.. lltfe therefore, slily weldor:, • Lett ail threefools a.prating„; And being in a fright, sir, Rd gout took her if sir, And'oe'er we. beard of dna, Ike." Nfr. HoNs 4; •Illnill••d to trier to various paro di es, kc. in Croxali's Fair Circassian. rte Humourist's id,, ga znie, Old England's le Drum, and Grose's oii„. H e iiso introduced a new one fr m a speeei ri Mr. Burke in 1780, on the dissolution of the t oc kinghain Adininistratien ; on which he said, And now I hereby commit their body to the grave, ts h,-, to ashes, dust to dust, in certain hope and ex ytctatiun of the i. rious resurrection, which by its r o.i deeds it shall surely see," &c. He would now t all their attention to a parody which was published' by Mr. Reeves some years ago, whets he was at the }, ca d's a society for ,trpia irting loyalty and 010Freril Jio)bins and levellers. It we. called, The Jr +hl Freekt/ders Cateckirser."- l'he Attorney Gene 11.id volcen .of the small sum for whi c h hi s ( t h e drieadant's) public anons were s. Id; but Mr. Reeves's poo dy ei.s• published for .s petioy. Mr. Reeves, t s wever, .he knew not how, hail greatly improved hi online a since tnat time, and ins name stood is the title-,.age tie book of Common. Prayer, in most getieral use; as pat, ntee. In :hat Prayer Book he had ins red a preface, dedie,•ted to her Majesty, in which be pod her many coniphinents. .The Gep. *men *fluid observe, aiso, that Mr. Reeves was a l a wyer ; he w is a Barrister, and had been a Commis. Siemer of 11.nkrupts i but he (the defendant) did not believe ill it when Mr. Reeves published his parody had any conception that he was seeding religion: intention merely was to convey an instiuctson by ' jug the Catechism ; and it tie were now stan ehere the defendant did, h e, As a lawyer, would telithem that they could not corn set him ; but be never been prosecuted, and those two books, the idy and theCatechisin, now went together...* Lordship would, doubtless, recollect, that one of suns was a member ot that association at the . and Anchor ; but so ardent was the seal of Reeves to put down levellers and retormers,that Law withdrew himsiif 'tom the society. Mr. was now its a very different situation Irons the int. Mr. Reeves was a ricii man, and held a wider Government : the defendant was a hunible ihop-keeper. Would his Majesty's At , general bring t. Retires before the Court ? I Slid 'he taught not to bring him there ; for would tett them that Mr. Reeves had no to ridicule the-Citethism. Neither had he when lie vanished to, parody.-- to serve .the p..litical party be ' Mr. Hone). It was not tasted, or those who iti power oppressed and perse tinder , pretences. The press was common •t it was a great security which every man ' telt he read aganist injustice. Even he, there, telt that there was no one in that , even ii.disposed (which he believed there was to do him an injustice, who would dare to do so. why N.-Because the act could not be hidden in it would be made known by means of a and excite a public opinioN#Which would __ ter the most powerful ot evil doers. Let this prosecution, which aimed at so valuable • as the Liberty of the Press, be put on its . and be stripped of its hypocritical pro There was a passage which he had read yes , Irons the , works of a man who had died for the Bishop Latimer. He could not forbear again - it. It was to be found' to the second volume p. 90111; and was termed 4 4 the first of Latimer's 'Vero Sermons of the Lnot, l bridge in Yid vent. 1596." At Bishop thus preached tt om tits ' 'And this is the record of sent Priests and Levitt% him, Wit • art thou ?" declare Christ's rule unto to be done, I will apply custom atthis time of Christ , declare unto yott Christ's in Christ's cards, Wherein yosil The game that we will trials/4 (this word is what we' it be well played at, 1 the stamders and lookenl insomuch that there is se : at this triumph with theist all winners and so tarn s, Christian mast and woman play , may have and obtain the also, that the trittmph home auto him all the other ; Ire of. Ncrw, then, take most appear and be shewed He would not uke up the reading the whole of what the said, but ireold norkse him. he described bad passions 4, These evil disposed a -1 us are •alway contrary to • shall we do now or Imagine Turks, and to 'subdue them ?- 111 tame for a Christian man ..sinton Toth. Nay, •it shall cost a tramp in their way, and '• who AA hale the better. obis fashion with thiseard.' happen .thew foul resigns and stomach* against oar brother unkind words, injuries, or ..done untovsliontrary onto ' Vs , call unt9vabr utineut• questionmatoostnelves, " Who 4i Lam *Christian man." Jhen ' he was in .the 'habit :of: a sermon with a wood Auk ltraeltelltediN in the 44t Mt: hs 'pulpit. Hem wished the' Attorney-General wash 4. ask himself Tindal l which the Martyr required his hearers. wash them selves.and to answer to his conscience whether there was a necessity -for- their proceedings against him. On the 22d of February he had stopped the sale of these parodies. and it was on the Sd of May that the itsformatiJn was filed against him. He disclaimed any evilintention in his merriment more th , it Bashi, Latimer bad in 'his. Thouah Perhaps such. a mode of preaching av that of the. Bishop would not be tole rated at this day, yet every one would acquit him 0 , en evil intention. Archdeacon Paley, his Lordship's tutor, preached a sermon at, Cambridge, when Mr. Pitt visited that University, on the text here are bet *even loaves and five small fishes, and what are they among so. many." Lord Enutonottanton said, the defendant was mis, taken on that point. There never had been any ser mon from that test by Dr. Paley. There was an anecdote of that sort, and he was sorry for it. Mr. Hotta would not venture to contradict his Lordship, and was much obliged to him for stating that there had been a story of that kind. Mr. Hone proceeded—There was a parody from The True Bri ton, in the Spirit of the Public Journals, of 1507, on the Lord's Prayer. I'ne proprietor of the paper at Pat time was Mr. John Hermit, who had now a place or pension from his Majesty's Government.—. Was it lair, honourable, or manly, to make such a distinction between parodists? There was also the parody by Canning, one of his persecutors, one of the men who advised this prosecution, or who might have prevented it. Was it lair that Ministers, to excite a prejedice against a man who had only been in the habit of doing what they themselves had done, should charge him with blasphemy—a crime which they knew he bad never committed ? Mr. Hone then alluded to the caricatures of Wray, who welkin the pay of Messrs. Pitt. Canning. Hookhatn, Frere, and Co. in which he ridiculed the Duke of Bedford, Mr. Fox, and Mr..Whitbread ; in which he also described Messrs. - Coleridge. and Soethey as asses supporting the cornucopia of ignorance, without any other difference than that the ears of the latter were longer than the ears of the torness....— In the same print the Cowrie, was saricatarae, and out of the pocket of the emblematical figure hung a French paper. which alluded, Mr. Hose said, to as iMpoSitton pructoseJ by the Courier on a rival paper milted the l'elegratei. by the fabrication of a French paper called L'Aelai., from which forgery the paint was induced to take some false articles of news. Alt this was in illustration and furtherance of the objectaof Mr. Canning's parody. Mr. Hone then al luded to the manner in which the different 'sacred hymns had been applied by the Dissenters to lay tunes, with the most laudable intent ; a practice, how. ever, which would be reprehensible on the same grounds on which parodies were reprehended. lie repeated the instances of llth:practice which he Bad adduced on his lormer trial. He then proceeded to adduce instances of the parodies of thaLitanyitself. The first he mentioned was from the " Romp. or an exact Collection of the choicest Poems andSongasa. hating to the late Times. By the most eminent Wits. Pro:o Anno 1630 to anno 1661. -1.....nd0e.1602.".-- A LETANY FOR THE NEW YEAR, From all and mere than 1 have wrisea ben, I wish you welt protected this New-yea: From Ucil War, and such uncivil slings, As ruins Law and Gospel, Priests and Kings ; From these who hr self-ends would all betray, From such new Sestets that Pistol when they pray, From nattering Faces with infernal Souls, From new Reformers. pleb as pull dawn Paula, From lamywoby Lords, Irmo Town betrayers, From Aprou preachers sad Zatempore Prams, From Pulpit bitarbany mid bold Rebuilt's, From Blood and—somentlnaselap,tkat I told tell ye so, Prom new False Teachers which destroy the old, From those Mai lawn the Clevel ism chid, From that black Pack where Chiba We ammo' Tnuey. Prom Bodies Politique toad frets the Rump, From them that Risme whoa they should Repair s Frown sucb a• cut of Heads Instead of Hair, From twelve mouths Tales and Abortive Vote., Frets! chargeable Nummt.:bildruis in red Coats, .^ • From such as tell their Soule to saws their Sams.. From City ChAwers diet make Heads ter Drees, From Meatstvates which have so truth or aseirkaars From the Red &sham now is Gresham Cage, Roes Governments erected by dm Rabble, from sweet Sir Arthur's Katsina of the Round Tablet Ihen followed as.other from the same Book, Raid •I The City of London's Litany." of ,which he read a short extract t Frans amps that do Role against Cumin and Laws, From Card% et Peados ottrtda Goad Old came, From Wives that bate sada mbiek anabarptr tbao ohms. Good Jove deliver es !reset Men wbo seek riskt Wilma ie. s« to be bad. From 1111d1 who mak hood where Si damp are bad, From wise Mos ter won. them look or men mad, Good love, Ike. Foes Soltherm that wrath therm wat ethwes, Froth Rage that stuff Clef , . to pleasant Mir WWI% Width they secretly evens front Commonwealth wore% Good love, The nest was from the r, Collection of the newest' and most ingenious Peens, etc. against Popery," pub lished soon aker the Rev, slating. -A NSW PROTESTANT UTAST. Cobweb.Lawn-Chartere„ from shanyfreedaM banters, Our Llberty-beepers and new Gospel-planters. And the trusty Wed bends of our Feet Quo Warrenton, Libor& Nos, ke. Fount High Court Commistlone, to ROM* to rejoin as, Prost a Rheims* Cbsemlior, the Wasesill Fudge Waal, Made Mead of oar March by new I' Dived*. Vitas No., Ste. From our great Tom Reeorde, eat out into thrums, From Weeteitoper 4A S. aid writh ra•Oes sad plums, Magna Charm / !Amos Fano, made fodder for bums, Libera Not, Sm. Promo new float lkone Nob*, to tit' of SW'S of Lawn, Lad all to make roan for the PopoLander Spawn • tees etw Babe bent, through iped-antainreime Spawn; tams Neal its. From resotvlng o'er night, where to Be in tomorrow, And from tuning Back doer to Midwife thorow, Eight months foll.grown , damthibkbess From a GodAtther Pope, 40 the +fele of 'Minim; From three (Arleta° Names to anollir-name nolinown, With a Tyler Mitch Nurse, now dm Modeles L mak% genet ibor* Mos, There was one from the second part Of the collection, beginning— From immode rate floes and defamation, - From Bra. Monte sameilerombornatioa, • And. front .bar of aatimetakilin. Men oat Domino- Front a body that's English, minds d shot Y 1101041. From a Lawyer tastresidslibesn oyster womb, And mom the odor 'Bonner span 4bo Sleek 404 1 ;41M Abriktrle• Air- Sts. Mr..floitp read Many other in the same There was one whiCh he bad omitted to *" boat pangeeseiTow,' jJbeta Nose regnlast order. yrit;ch he sbou)d now mention. It 'rasa parodyon this very litany by Ben Juason, in his play called Cynthia's Revels : Amt. Press Spanish sbrugs, French fates, smirks, lrps, and all affected humours, Chorus—Good Mercury defend us. Pba. Prom secret friends, sweet servants, loves doves, and such pltantastilue humours, Mercury defend ov. Amo. Prom stabbing of armee, lap-dragous. health", whiffet, and all such swaggering humours, Cliorus—tiood Mercury defend us. Pha. From Waving iannee, coy glance., &hes, cringes, and all each straying humour". Chorus—Gond Mercury defend wt. Amo. From making love by atturtarb courting of puppets, and paying for new acqtaintance Chcrts4—Good Mercury deliver us, Ste. !cc. This the play informet us, was acted first in 1600, by the then children of Queen Elizabeth's Chapel, allowed by the master of the revels ;" so that in those days, Ben Jolson, who, from his works was evidently a most devout man, did not think it unbe coming to write a parody ; nor did a Queen, who was scrupulous in requiring respect to things established, think it unfit to be recited even by the children of her chapel. He had thus shewn that parodies were not necessarily disrespectful to the work parodied; that they had been uniformly allowed, and he should now shew that his did riot deserve to be made an excep tion to the general rule. ' Here Mr. HONE proceeded to animadvert upon the several paisages of the Litany which was the subject .4 prosecution, selecting such as appeared to girt most offence to the political Gentlemen, who sought, under the gui;e of religion, to effect a political object in his rain It prayed our delivery, Ist, from •• an unnational Debt ;" 2d, from 44 unmerited Pensions ;" 3d, from Sinecure Places ;" 4th. from "an extra- v agent Civil List ;" and sth, from utter starvation." Now, as to the first, how kw were they who doubted, that many debts had been contracted by our rulers, fir purposes by no means national?—Good Ministers hag nothing to fear from the promulgation of such things. No Government could, indeed, have so much reason to fear any thing as the effects of such prosecution, s prosecution as he had been subjected to in this in stance, in consequence of the frank expression of his mind. Then as to unmerited pensions, that was not to be understood as applying to the reward of public servants. such, for instance, as really perforated their duty upon the Bench or elsewhere, but to those who derived 'fortunes from the public purse, without any public setvier whatever • and how niany such men were to be found in England t Of the 1 , Extrava- - font Civil List" he did not think it necess.iry to say any thing ; nor of « utter starvation" either, for no one acquainted with London, or any of the great towns in the country, for the last twelve months, could require any information upon that point. lie had himself, indeed, seen two human beings who had actually expired in the streets from lbsultite want. Bot similar scenes must have been witnessed by num bers of those who heard him, as well as by the Jury. i For in every direction the ravages of famine were A- Able and most sensibly felt. Next our delivery was 'prayed from the blind imbecility of Ministers, as well as from the pride and vain-glory of warlike establish.! menus in time of peace. This prayer might be found Lash with by his political prosecutors, but yet, who sold doubt the Imbecility of Ministers r He, 'for one, confessed that he could not. There were, he believed, some men of honest purpose among the Ministers, while they evinced the want of wisdom; but there were others in that body, who, while they bad reputation for talent, had equal reputation for the want of principle. What, then, was to be expected' , from such a combihation of integrity without talent, , and talent without integrity ; Nothing, surely, but imbecility. In asserting that implicitly, himerer, he did not mean to reflect upon the private life of any man; for, correctly speaking, the private life of a ! man had no connection with his fitness or capability for the performance of the great duties of a statesman- ; —A man might be very amiable towards his family and friends, and exemplary in the performance of all the moral duties, while his mind was not large enough to conceive the obligations which attached to the cha. I racier of a Statesman. The mind of a good private man might indeed be quite incompetent to embrace, a Statesman's views, or to understand his duties. A very good man might therefore, from such incapacity, tttt lam a meteor, like the present Ministers, groping its the dark. He might, notwithstanding the honesty wf his intentions, or the purity of his principles, be wholly incapable of devising means to maintain the hum, the dignity, and the honour of the country. He could mean no reflection, therefore, upon the per. sonel character of the Members of the Administration,' when he charged them with imbecility. Now, as to the warlike establishments in time of peace, he put it to the Jury whether such establishments did not at this moment notoriously exist t There was an Act rif Parliament, no doubt. to sanction those establish ments ; but this country had often witnessed Acts of Parliament which were not entitled to public respect—which were, indeed, in direct contradiction to the principles of the British Constitution. This be-said becauot he thought so; and was it not better that he and others should be encouraged to express their mind, than to conceal it, 'and reserve the expression for secret conspiracies ? Every rational n,aa would answer in the affirmative. For it was always more desirable to auy considerate man to be told when and where be was wrong, than to bare the advantage of such informed in withheld from him. Such must be the case with every man oho was not deaf to his own interest. For himself he could have no hesitation in saying that he should esteem the friend w,bo frankly told him be was wrong, because he should thus learn how to apply a remedy, and the minister who did not so feel towards any man who informed them of their errors, must be in sensible to their interest, as well as indifferent to their character. But any government which would not hear the truth must be a despotism. He did not mean that calumny should be tolerated, but that the es incision of truth should,be encouraged, and no honest man could have any thing to fear from misrepresen tation ; for, that honesty was always sure to defeat,' whether it applied to Government or to individuals. But wby should Government be afraid of truth or falbe• hood in any case ?- Nothing but weakness could pro. ducessneb fear, and that weakness must be pitiabl Another prayer appeared in the Litany, that the country should be delivered from all the deadly sins attendant upon a corrupt method of election, from stal die deceits of tbe'pensione4 birelinits of *the . press. net who could deny that the most flagitious tomtit• tioo prevailed in the prevalent system of election for Members of Parliament? Such corruption was Ins deed as notorious as the son at . tr.neiday, and there. fore this prayer ci.uld not be condenineatunless upon the ground that truth • as a libel, and this was a doe• trine never recognized by any Jury (who were entitled to judee of the law), although generally asserted by the Judge.. But for himself he could not conceive hove truth, with respect to any public act or public officer, could be deemed a libel ; and he hoped the Jury whom he had the !moue to address would not give up their right of decision upon this material point to the dictum of any individual. Another prayer iv peared in this Litany for our deliveranee from taxes levied by distress—from gaols crowded with debtors —own poor-nooses overfl•oving with paupers. As to the first, it was universally known that the greater part of the taxes were levied by distress at the time this Litany was published. One tax-gatherer, indeed, employed in the vicinity of Fleet-street had told him, that he had levied more distress for the payment of taxes within nine months before this publication, than he had done within the sixteen preceding years.— When then such a great calamity existed—when all things were going wrung, where was the harm of saying so; or was it not rather desirable to make it . known ? Were he told that his affairs were going wrong, his first object would be to cast up his ac counts, in order to see the magnitude of his danger, and to provide some remedy,, while he would thank the individual who roused .him to a sense of his dan ger. And why should not the Government be equally grateful fur similar information and excitement to inquiry ? But it would he so, it its members were not imbecile, self-conceited, and supine." Tnen as to prisons crowded with debtors, was there a quarter of England, or a man in the country, !hat could not ma. • tify this fact ? He l,fmself had seen the c , ndition 9f the King's Bence prison. The night upon which he was committed to that prison, in consequence of this prosecution, he had to *walk about the y.ird for sonic time, unknowing where to find a lodging.-.. At length he applied et the door for the tipstaff by whom he was taken into custody, and brought in, requesting to know where he war to obtain a night's lodging ? and, in consequence of this application, he I was conducted to the coffee-room, where alone he could, from the crowded state of the prison, find any sort of accommodation. Such was the statement to him at the time, and such he afterwards tots id to be the fact. At the eeffee-room he took up his abode, and there he was under the necessity of paying three shillings a night tia sleeping in a room with three other prisoners. But this inconvenience, which he most sensibly felt, was inevitable, from the ea timely crowned state of the prison. Another root of the crowded state of our prisons, he had lately seen at Maidstone, where a prison, to occupy fourteen acres of ground Was now buildieg, • AVOW.. I edly with a view to provide proper accommodation for the miserable prisoners of the County of Kent, in addition to that afforded by the County jail;-:- With respect to the overflow of poorhouses, he did not think it necessary to say ally thing upon that point, as every Gtintleman of the Jury must, no doubt be competent, trona his own experience and information, fully to decide the truth of toot allegation. The nest prayer of this publication was, as to 00 a Parliament chosen only by one-tenth of the people. Taxes raised to pay wholesale butchers their subsidies, false doe. trine., heresy, and chisms. Conspiracies against ffie Liberty of the People, and obstacles thrown in the way of our natural and constitutional rights." That Pat. liaments were not chosen by more than one-tenth of the people, was, he apprehended, an indisputable fact o -- He, himself, had been fur the most part of his life a housekeeper, and yet he had never enjoyed the right of voting fur a Member of the House of Commons. This he must consider as a great grievance. He, and others, similarly circumstanced, were no doubt told that they were represented virtually as some class. But this was a mere delusion, only aggro. eating the uitjust privation of his right by an iucuit to his understanding. Then, as to human butchery in what other light were those to be regarded, who let out their subjects to be shot at, or to shoot others for hire I False doctrines were surely chargeable upon those who sanctioned those notions of '0 leglti mate right," which were inconsistent with the Con stitution and conduct of this country. • But such doc trines were to be expected from those Ministers who were inattentive to the want, of the people—who dis regarded the example of - that truly great Sovereign, Henry IV. who said, in the spirit of true benevolence and princely duty, that his utmost ambition was, that every peasant in his dominions should have each day a pullet in his fit. The existence of conspiracies ;against the liberties of the people was sufficiently ob thous from the suspension of the Habeas Cot plls Act. —The next prayer In the Goverinent-0. that ye spend not extravagantly the money raised from the production of our labours, nor take for yourselves that which ye need not," was surely not to be con. denined, especially after that Government had lane. tioned theseandalcus Lisbon jon. in which Mr.. Ca nning took from the public purse, no less tban £14,000 for doing nothing in a situation in which his prede. cessor, who had something to Jo, received only 4000. Yet this deduction (tom the public purse, at a period of, dire distress, Ministers made for the most =pro,. per purpose, and Mr. Canning accepted the bribe without the excuse of necessity, for his means were ample. But did not such a transaction justify an all j. SIMI to public money spent extravagantly, and given to those who needed it not.—After Vindicating Vie several passages of the Litany, Mr. Hone observed, that to any candid mind the whole production was only calculated to excite laughter, not against the Scripture, but against those towards whom the pa. rody was pointed, and laughter was not the 1)41)4 ee disposition of traitors t r disaffected men. No sr 7 1 x persons were like the lean Cassius, slow, sullen and unsocial, unless they met with persons of their o•-• - o description ; but there was nothing in this Litany cal culated to please such men, for they liked not a laugh . : He next produced sever:4i of Mr. Gilray's prints, and among them one called the kecoardiation, in which the Prince of Wales was mad s e in t n t e i t ad , d ig t a ts it s l ::•,e th K ee in . g an i si n more worthy to be called againstd ese wo Lds ea .— ve F n a , t a h i e i r d , , I , n 1 'la v e n., thy son—with the reply to it, taken from the parable of the prodigal son in the New Testament. -This was a very well execeted print, and he dated to say that it was in the collection of the Prince Regent hinteek, as be had all" Mr. Gilray's pieces. Having done this, he had any conception that he wa intention merely was to cony ruilyiug the Catechism ; and' ag• where the delendant did, he, trllthem that they could not cr had never been prosecuted, end t Fundy and the Catechists, noir LorJsflip would, doubtless, rl hi suns was a member ot that Down and Anchor ; but so and bir. Reeve* to put down leveller' 14.. Law withdrew himself trim Raver was now ill a very ditfereri ditadant. Mr. Reeves was a ft' fission. under Government poor humble ihup-keeper. Wou fancy general tiring Sit. Reuvet No I an: 'he ought not to bring Lordship would tett them that I ' , tuition to ridicule the-Ctfrthist -ny such intention when he plot' Wirev d to serve .1 h you he (Mr. I • • • r Jae ,h srailed•t ite power c wed under se pretences. Th • Telly; it was a great secant k:ng.and telt he tuad against i t he stood there, telt that there 'outs, e'en it. disposed (which ht r ) to do him an injustice, who s est why i'—Because the act cou II corner: it would be made kni • press, and excite a public a terrible to the must powertut • skis prosecution, which aim • liege as the Liberty ot the I ground, and be stripped ot 1 There was a passage whit I. day tram the.works ot a man 'th, Bishop Latimer. He coy adios it. It was to be loan:Iv his works, p. 908; and was tt r* aster Hugh Letimer's Tiro Be ched at Cambridge in AI t solemn time, the Bishop the , John i. verse 9-41 And It • n, when the Jews sent I r •-• Jerusalem to ask him, tind because I cannot declass • .at one time as it often to ta to ;self according to your custom a'. I will, as I said, &chit le, bat that shall be in Christi 'alt perceive Christ's role. Th • y at shall . be the triewini (i 'w call trearp), which, it it tss • t deateth shall win, and the . • • shall do the **mei 'ingot that is willing to play at th rds but they shall be all wi , therefore, every Christian xi these cards, that . they may ...h. Yen must mark, ale ust apply to fetch home urn • ds, whatsoever suit they be .. thus first card, which mast a o you as tolloweth. l ' H. wi • of the Court by reading th erend Prelate had *aid, but f to a passage where* he de der the name of Turks. tions and sensualifies in us ae salvation. What shall we thrust down these Turks, =4 is a great ignominy and sham be bound and subject VINO a be so ; we will first east a lei '7 with them at cards who • us play, therefore, on this 11 • r.ensoever it shallthappen • crks do rise in -our stomachs neighbour, either for nnkir ill ongs, which they huve•done t rh mind, straiglitvrays let its .1 rs Ice and speak that ()notional rev thou!" Tne answer is, •44 •I •a , had te en a r arthe time "en't eu • Hog in 44, Tosco, a .sersuoi ha• Kh lig:Bishop am -represcrt w Ohre luudth k cirri in