Star. — London, England, 1822-04-16 00:00:00

- LAW COURT OF IC FAME V. BARCLA Mr. SCARLITT stated plaintiff, he said, was plain of an injury of the most serious kind, which had been brought on him by the conduct of the defend ants. The plaintiff was one of the firm of Fabre and Co. merchants and bankers in Paris; of the respect-, ability of the defendants no one could entertain a doubt ; and he was persuaded their conduct towards the plaintiff must have originated in mistake. The Learned Counsel then proceeded to state the facts of the case. from which be inferred that the present de fendants, for the purpose &forwarding the views of •another French House, Thurett and Co. who had' lent over p , ocess, and procured the arrest of the pre sent plaintiff for £2OOO, in order to detain him in this country, and prevent his returning to France to be a witness in a case pending there against Thuretta; had lodged a detainer against him for a debt of £Boo' and upwards, there being only D2OO due to them ; and that, on this detainer, the plaintiff had been kept in prison for six months. It was to obtain a compen sation for this imprisonment that the present action was brought. The Learned Counsel called evidence to rove his case, but failing entirely to bring any knowledge home to the defendants, the plaintiff was, by direction of the Chief Justice—Nonsuited. STORTERFORTH V. HARRISON. This was an action to recover £435, the value of a quantity of hides and leather, sold by the plaintiff to the defendant and another individual, the latter of vhom had since become bankrupt. The plaintiff contended that at the time the sale took place, the defendant was a partner in the purchase. The de• fondant, on the contrary, denied having any interest in the transaction, except that of broker. The ques tion therefore was, whether a partnership existed or not at the time of the purchase ? The Jury, being of opinion it was a partnership transaction, found a, verdict for the plaintiff—Da rnages £43s—Costs 0.. • „ attorney, residing it Newcastle, had known Hardy from 1810, And - had: frequently, seen him write; does not believe the signature to the , note to be his hard-writing. Saw him *rite three months before; at that time his writing was almost 'unintelligible. • Cross-exawined.—lt is nothing like the hand-writing of the deceased, though some persons might mistake 'it, as some of the letters bore a resemblance to Mr. Hardy's writing. Mr. Brofield, solicitor, at Ne w c as t le, knew the de rzased ; had seen him write; thought the signature to the note a much freer hand ; it bore some resem blance to it, and appeared to be an imitation. Mr. Charleton had known deceased some year,: did not think the signature to the note his hand-writing. Elizabeth Seely, daughter to the deceased, said, he was eighty-two when he died. He was taken ill in September, 1819. and sever quitted his house after, unless some person led him. In the month of De cember, he gbt much worse ; his illness affected his bands very much ; he coup not write; his hands zwelled, and he lost the use of three of the fingers of his right hand. Mrs. Mitcheson died four years before her father. Her father was not on good terms with Mitcheson. He came several times to see the deceased during his last illness, but was itever alone with him : witness's daughter used to write for her grandfather ' who could not have signed'any note in the month of December. Did not believe the signa- , tune to tht note was her father's writing. Did not think be could ever write so well. Jane Thomson, another daughter of the deceasd, corroborated the testimony of tl}e last witness. John Pybus, a solicitor, was sent for in September, 1819, to take instructions from Mr. Hardy for his will. Hardy said he had a will in his drawers, but was dissatisfied with it, because Mitcheson's name was in it. Witness does not believe the signature to the note to be his hand-writing. The Jury here rose, to intimate that their minds were maJe up. The CHIEF Jrsvcr.—Gentlemen, you have not yet heard the plaintiff's Counsel. Mr. GURNEY.—M y Lord, I fear I shall make but very little impression. I will be nonsuitcd.—Plain tiff Nonsuited. per to' desert ____ young woman, . _ shillings a week for the support of the child. Har riet Harding, in her anxiety to see the father of her child after her illness, went, accompanied by a Mrs. Scales, .a widow, to his yard with the child. Upon !entering the yard, Head presented himself to her,, and inked what she wanted there? She replied, that she panted not him, but the father of her child. Tapley Was in the yard at the time, and 'Head pointed to' tim and said, ~ There is Joe." Tapley then iv roachecl, and desired Head to say what she had in , iced him to do; upon which Head said, 6 , She wanted me to sleep with her." Theisvosecutriz, when she I heard this infamous and false imputation, called Head i 4 , x pimp and a swindler," and reproached him with the services she had - rendered him when he first came into the service of Tapley in a deplorable condition., Head, without any ceremony, struck her with his fist in the face, and then beat her with a stick about the neck and back, Tapley all the time being a spectator of the scene, and having called upon Head to expose her pea son, and whip her like a child. Head prepared himself for this exercise, ill conformity with his mas ter's commands, and but for the interference of Mrs. Scales, would have accomplished his object, in the presence of a number of little boys who were collected in the yard. Finding himself disappointed in this aim, he beat the poor young woman from one end of the yard to the other, and as soon as he reached the stteet entrance, he dashed her into the street, and she fell almost senseless against the steps of a hall-door.— Head having performed this manly feat, ran ofF. The poor girl had been confined with her child at the time the fellow said she asked him to gn to bed to her. The ItEconocß here expressed hi, surprise that Tapley had not been incladed in the indictment. Mr. Annarn said, upon the part of the defence, that, if his instructions were correct, he could prove the whole stay to be a fabrication. If, however, the facts could not be contradicted, he was ready to ad mit that the case was as bad a one as ever appeared in a Court of Justice. • The wife of Tapley's groom was then called, but instead of contradicting the circumstances that had been sworn to, she, so far as she was an evidence, corroborated the testimony for the prosecution. She heard Head say " that Harriet H:trding wanted him to sleep with her," and saw him push her against the wall. 11Ir. AxnnEws merely said, in commenting upon the evidence for the defence, that it proved the truth of the charge, and asked why Tapley, who had been in Court in the morning, and could have served Head if the evidence for the prosecution was false, had withdrawn himself?—Head wished to be heard. The ltecoanErt advised him to be guided by his Counsel.—Head was unwilling to be so guided. The lircortnrn told him he might proceed. Head then said that poison had been found, which Hari ict Harding had set for him. The Jury instantly found him Guilty, and he was sentenced to imprisonment in the Giltspur-str&et Compter for six calendar months. The IlEc .RDER hoped Tapley m ould be speedily brought to justice. Some applause was expressed in the Court. The Old-Bailey Sessions commence to-morrow.— The following is a summary statement of the priso ners for trial, with the nature of their offences: 11fiddleser. London. - 1 - 0 - 9 - 3 • $ - 0 - 1 - 1 - 9 - 1 - - - 5 - 1 Receiving Stolen Goods - 3 - 0 Bigamy - - • 3 - 0 Larcenies - - - • - 149 - 23 Uttering Counterfeit Money - 2 - 0 Stealing from the Person - 21 - - 4 Fraud Publishing I3lasphemousWorks• 0 • - 1 Forgery 1 Rape 1 - 0 horse Stealing - - - 2 - 0 Maliciously Stabbing - - 2 0 Uttering Forged Bauk-notes - 1 - 0 Murder - - - Burglary - - - Highway Robbery - - I lonsebreaking - - Stealing in a Dwelling-house 217 36 - - - - 263 Mb gn • This is " the man unknown," who refused to plead at the last ... Total Stssitin, and was by the Court committed to Nee/gate. The Calendar, on the whole, it will he seen is rather heavy. The alarming increase of street robberies will be viewed with much concern. SWINDLING.—A case most ingeniously contrived, and successfully carried into execution on Saturday last, is scarcely .to be equalled on the records of fraud. it was equal to that practised on Rundell and Bridge, the jewellers, some time ago ; but the present case is only at theexpense of four costly gold watches. The swindler was dressed in a brown frock coat, wears large whiskers, and is well calculated for im position in address and manners. A house in South ampton-street, Strand, having been advertised to be let, he called about, it several times, and appointed Saturday last to call with some Ladies, when he could . give a final answer, and the servants were desired, if the occupants were from home, to shew the gentleman and his party into the dining.rooms. Having se sured this point, the swindler called upon Mr. Ely,' a jeweller, at the latter end of the week, and after looking over some trifles in the shop, he desired that some ladies' watches might be brought to his resi dence, in Southampton-street, at a certain hour on Saturday, for inspection. The swindler called some time before the jeweller was expected, god inquired if the Ladies who were to meet him there had called? and on being informed in the negative, he affected surprise, and desired them to be informed of his ar rival' when they came.. He was shewn into the front drawing-room, but he preferred the back, and de sired the servant to shew a Gentleman who would call, into the front room, and let him know when be arrived. The jeweller was to hi...time with his goods, and the swindler paid him a visit, and after looking over the goods, he selected four watches, worth - klOO, to thew the Ladles in thq nett nil" instead . of {which be took his batunlAsiltakscit WA** wat 4llo . tAtter waiting until out of patience, the jewellersang , the bell, when it was discovered that the swindler *had &caned with the watches. IBMs Pus Us Wheat. oe -6...i...it Bailers ...24s 26s Bade Red, Hata hro' or burl Pees 22s Beabansred .......: Os _ rikIRAL AVERAGE PRICE OP BRITISH COl - 7, (w*scn nossawi tarrerrairton), ide the Weekending Aprii 6, 1998, made up front the Return. of the Inspectors in the different Cities and Towns in llng. • Ind and Wake. tz! 4di 'di Oats 161 Id 1 Selma' 2ls r 4 ltie 10d I Rye 21* 44 Peas !2s 24 SUGAR. The Average Price of Brown or Muscovado Sugar, com: posed from the Returns made in the Week ending 10th April, iamb au. 70. per cwt. escludve of Importation Muer. NEWOATE AND LRA DENG ALL MARK las. AVAIL (By the Carr.tse.) Beef is ltd to 24 81 V Vea1 ....—...14 04 to 44 01 Mutton.. .... 51 2s Od to 2s Yd I Pork ........4s Od to ZI s 64 Lamb Ss 5d to 70 Od. Prices, in Newgate-Market, by the joint— Beef, worst 2d per lb. Veal, worst Best, 4d per lb. Pork Mutton, worst 2d per lb. Best Lomb, worst, 7d. nalfpenny ; best 2d. APItIIOS. I 2.5 s Pohl& .:. els Vied 19s ftt. Lea Z 52 Ait 54 per lb. 34 per 15. 6d per lb. YEsTiatim v. WHITCCHAPICIL Hay... 31 3s to 41 Os Oi Straw 11 Ss to 11 134 04 L Glover 41 Os to 51 Os od PRICES., MAY Awe s' ST. JAMES ' S. Hay 31 3s 04 to 41 45 od Straw 11 71 ott to 11 17s tld Clover zI Ls 04 to 41 $s Od PRICK 01 new asts. Kent Sussex 2l 83 to 7.1 3.1 Essex Foreign PRICE or-TALLOW, Town Tallow 44s 041 Yellow. Russia ......, 44% 04 White ditto Soap ditto Melted Stuff.. PRICE OF C I ANDIF.FiI-1 Candles, per doz. 9s 6d-11 allowed for r ilopS. us* enema. Kent Sussex .21 14s to :31 10s Kssex —.— 2l las to 41 4s Farnham SOAP, &c. per 1125. Ditto rough Yellow Soap — Mottled ... ....—..—.—... 9(4 Curd Pa1m...... . . . _ 7 rom Tallow Chandlers' Hall. fluids, Ils Otl; 6d. per dozen eady money. • . . ' .. . .. . . .. , . . . . • ~ • . . .. . , . . . ..• . - • •• • . • , • • • , - . . . . • , • • , • - - _--... INTELLIGENCE. - *de of the famil ~ and,would nS baye.com!, had The Loarned Counsel dm-asated .the folio: 471 s t- i cumsumes, which wsawinikhosmout int t ' COW; =CHANGE, 14411.14.-L ANA Altilisj litt . iitit been r•• . .. . KING'S 8815C43, APRIL 11. • . Tar: Dawwn pored - • thit liiatwthing to be Harrkit H"ding , n"t er =r e ior a so .age. . =MAN. ..::._....:..e Whist.. Kent and ltdirea —.......:..;.1 that of-the deceased Mi. Hardy,- ~.. lived 'with - Tapley, the h . Ake. yew, me — "ha ain.......... ..... ... soe ssa ores, Panama • . ..... -2 (CLAY, SANDERSON, AND 10.. Th e Mr: Sciacer , . ~,,. . , i for the defendlints, 4 oklied the fol. had by him four children, all orwhoiii died es'cept so. Su :-. p 0 b0b.....- ....;.1 stated this case to the Jury. the youngest, an infant two months old. Poe some sem —.... ROD 41S. ....1--IrSed—.:.—._ ..& was a foreigner, and had to eem- lowintwitnesses : _r -1_ - __-_. _..........1.:nA whirh had A . Dawson an • .A4 in my:wile'' , reshwal it Newcastle, cause not stated upon the true } , Tapley thought pro. le•-••••• • ------- 26 . Os -Filbor , Per gistli.-" - -... v 1 .4 _2_ r_-... ana ra_ lan& had frectuenthr. per to desert this young woman , but allow•ed five Hadel usit ...•-••• ---:7 4 ' 2 . 5 s 46 ft: , masias. P4e We M• - ...... •••• __ __ . 1 .... _ . READER V. ELLIS. F S I ~►.~` 4 : • r I • rt if L -,- .4 This was an action to recover the value of 57 pun cheons of geneva, consigned by the plaintiff to a per• son named Tan Brokenhaff. •It appeared that the plaintiff was a merchant residing at Amsterdam, and was in the habit of consigning goods to Tan Broken haff, as his factor. Tan Brokenhaff usually employed the defendant as his broker to sell. • Previous to the arrival of the gooCsr in question, he had fallen into embarrassments, and obtained advances from the de fendant, pledging to him the expected goods as secu rity, and the property was lodged in the London Docks in the defendant's name, to give him a lien on them. Tan Brokenhaff ultimately' failed, and the defendant took possession cf these goods, as having purchased them ; and in reply to the application of t.:e• plaintiff to have the goods or their proceed, given up, he set up a claim to them, as having a right to detain them in payment of the money due from Tan Brokenhaff to him. The plaintiff, cm the contrary, contended that the defendant could have no claim to the goods, inasmuch as it was an esta blished law, that, though an agent or factor c0u1..1 w i ll the goods of his principal outright, he could not pledge them. The CULL? JUSTICE held this to be the law,_ and observed. that in this case it was clearly a pledging of the goods, even before they came to hand ; and, therefore, that the plaintiff was entitled to a verdict. Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 4:523. AUTVIESON V. THE EXECUTORS OF HARDY, DECEASED. This was an action on a promissory note for £5OO, made by James Hardy, deceased, in favour of the plaintiff, dated December 16, 1519. Mr. GURNEY, in stating the case, said, the plaintiff had married Mr. Hardy's daughter, who had given l*n, the note in question as a portion with his wife. It would have been unnecessary for him to have stated this, but he understood it was now to be con tended this note was a forgery. He would call se- Neral witnesses to prove the hand-writing, and then leave the question to the Jury. R. Brookes knew the late Mr. Hardy for 30 years before his death, and had frequently seen him write; had no doubt but the signature to the note now put into his hand, was his writing; the body of die note was the plaintiff's hand-writing. Hardy died in Fe bruary, 1820. Witness saw the note in January preceding ; he had frequently heard Hardy say he would make the plaintiff, who had married his daughter, comfortable when-he died. (,'rocs-exantined.—ls a builder by trade ; was a bankrupt three years ago, but was carrying on busi ness now. Had known V.aintiff 20 years, more or less; had frequently bought goods of Hardy; thinks he had dealings with bim in 1818; saw him in Ja nuary, 1320, at Newcastle-upon-Tyne. Had seea him write a dozen times or more; the last time was about six years ago; had heard that plaintiff was once in prison, but could not say . how lung Via: on a Jury which tried him some ye irs ago, but could not recollect how long since. :Thomas Wilkinson, an Attorney, residing at Durei ham, knew Mr. Hard) ; believes the signature to Hardy's hand-writing ; had no doubt of it; had seen him writ; frequently ; the last time was in Septem ber.lBl9, when he executed a codicil to his will. • Cress-extmined.—Made the codicil to his will at Hardy's own house ; never saw him out after. J. Jackson, a cabinet-maker at Newcastle, knew the late Mr. Hardy ; had seen him write ; and be lieved the signature to the note to be his hand writing; had - heard him say he would do something for his son-in-law. unfortunately failed in trade. Got his certificate, but not having capital to go on, had given up business, and now lived by working as a journeyman. R. Francis, a hatter, residing at Newcastle, knew lUr. Hardy, and had seen him write ; believed the signature to the note to be his writing. Heard him saw a short time before his death that he would do something for him. Did not know plaintiff till a short time before his death, when he heard -Hardy say that Mitcheson was to have the greater part of his property. Crou-examined..—Had been in prison lately, but unjustly. Was a baribupt about six months ago; -4 never had any dealings .witb Mitcheson in ac• bills ; does not recollect saying, that known bow bad a character Nitcheson was, commodation had he known ?ATM V. IIOTE. This was an action of trovvr brought by the plain .iff, who is a corn factor, to recover the value of 150 quarters cf barley, converted by the defendant to his . own use. It appeared that Thomas Hope, the bro ther of the defendant, in November, 1820, contracted with the plaintiff for the purchase of 162 quarters of barley, and obtained an order for the delivery on board his vessel. At this time the defendant had ac cepted bills for his accommodation to the amount of nearly I'2loo, which had not then become due. On' the day after the purchase, the defendant sold the barley to his brother, who immediately, and ont of the u,nal course of proceedings, procured it to be de- Evered to hi, servants. It was sworn by the son of the defenlaLt, th:tt his father bought the barley, al lowing his brother a pr. , fit of 6.1. per quarter, after observing that it was exceedingly cheap, and express ing his regret that he had not himself contracted for it with .the plaintiff ; but it was admitted that he pi ice was set against those of the acceptances become ing dac for which the defendant was compelled ti:s prcvide. Although Mr. George Hope, the defendant, had dealt with his brother for very little coin in the preceding year, be now, in one month, bought of him a large quantity, which bad previously been par chased from several dealers. At this time rumours were afloat in the Corn-market respecting the insol vency of Mr. Thomas Hope, which came to the-ears of the plaintiff, who applied to him for an order for the re-delivery of the barley, which he gave. On the 16th of December, the defendant took a lodging for his brother at Pentonville, in the feigned name of Harris, where he remained a week in concealment to avoid his creditors, and a commission was afterwards issued against him, on which. he was declared a bank : apt. The plaintiff having demanded the barley without success, now sought to recover its value from the defendant, contending that, under the circum stances, he had a tight to stop it in iransitu ; and that, even supposing he had no such right, the bankrupt invested him with it by the order for its re-delivery, because there never was a bonafide sale of the barley to the defendant. The Lone, CHIEF JUSTICE observed, that in which ever view they regarded the plaintiff's case, the real question at issue WAS the same—whether, at the time of the sale to the defendant, he was aware of the in solvency of his brother, and sought to secure himself by a. reala,f:de transaction at the expense'of the plain tiff. The law permitted a vender; before the deli:. very of goods was complete, to . stop them in their passage, on information Of the insolvency of the pur chaser, unless in the meantinie they were Lona fide sold to a. third person. In this case it would not be necessary to inquire whether the delivery was or was not complete in law, because, even supposing the de livery were, if there had been no bona fide sale to Mr. George Hope, Mr. Thomas Hope had power by the order to compel their re-delivery to the plaintiff. His Lordship then . recapitulated the facts applicable to the question, and left its decision to the Jury. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, which was taken by consent for the value of the whole 162 quarters, to prevent further litigation, though only 150 were mentioned in the pleadings. LONDON SESSIONS. Yesterday these Sessions commenced before the LORD MAYOR, RECORDIER, Aldermen SODOM, C. 131111TH, &C. William Head, who is in the service of a horse- dealer named Joseph Tapley, of Croydon and Al dersgate-street, was tried upon an indictment charg ing him with having beaten, and attempted to ex pose, the person of a very interesting young woman, named Harriet Harding. In opening the case, Mr. ANDRINTS said, he hoped, for the sake of human nature, that the .statement he had to make would be contradicted to . the satisfac tion of the Jury, for he did not suppose' there wet !von earth a briite in the shitp! of a man .rho could bkft atted Oie Pertion at tat Bait tufo* to hnve RAW HIDES Hest Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary ... 2, 01 to 21 41 stone) 2slod to .1s Od Market Cal; 10, od to os ( I Middlings 2s 6d to 24 ad gag. Horse us Cil to Os 0,11 Sheepskins. Ss. Od. :o 6s. 011.--Downs, 4s. Cd. to 5,. 6d. ,ICE OF LEATHER Butts, SO to 561hs each ......18d to 21d per lit. Ditto, 56 to 661bs each —tad to .x.l Dressing Hides ..... ..... ...... ......17d to lad Fine Coach Hides • 18d to lai Crop Hides, 55 to 40Ibs fur cutting l7d to 186 Ditto 45 to 50Ibs ...... .......... ....... lB6 to 206 Calf Skins, 50 t• 401bs ....... ... ........ 244 to 474 Ditto 50 to 701b5....—... ............ 46d to 55d Ditto 70 to Stabs °id to 274 Small Seals (Greenland) lBd to —4 Large ditto 13d to Illd Tanned (furs: Hides . .. 15d to 174 Spanish Horse Hides • 16d to 494 --.. PRICE OF COA LS • ATM 15. Beaumont 349. 3d.—Burdon 375. 9d.-.-Cares-hill Felling Main n3a. 6d.—lleaton 59s.453.—Newburn 36, 51— Ord's RallisUgh 31s.—Townley 364.—W3Mend V.'inker 41a.— Tanfield Trader :17s. 9d.—Bartley 3d.—Walkend BedWig ton 2ms.--Durhant 31s. 6.:.-194 Ships at Market-3 Waifs suldl 1 Unsold. Tile Human H.tir is an invaluable gift of Natur: ; it serves as an elegant ceveritig to the head, and enhare r t - beauty of the " human face divine." Young Ladies ai: :;er.- tlemen are particularly .tdvised to attend to the arrargetr,m of their Hair, and keep i: in order, as the Hair, attended to hi you;!:, is a sure preservative, aid fixes a stint:no for a beautiful I of Hair. This will inev:taidy b the ease, by using ltowttve ., Mates:sum On., which - -rodicates the scurf easy and r{. prevents it fatting off, or turning grey; strengthens the f lair se as to produce beautiful flowing curls, and the hair smooth azi ' glossy. In fine, this Oil renders that inestimable ornament tri: y elegant and beautiful; Eau' is the only preoration that really stases nutritious virtues fcr that purpose. Its incstimettit tura have gained it the patronage of his Royal Highness the ad.: of Sussex, their Imperial Majesties the Emperor an.: Fa.yress of Russia, and the Emperor of China, by the expreu antis rity. Particular caution is necessary in purchasing ; each get.ui,e bat tle is signed in red ink,' A. Rows.ano and Sox,' Vo. 1, ruiner of Kirby-street, Hatton-garden. All others are counterfeit% BIRTHS. • Sunday se'nnight, at Southsea Lodge, rear Portsmouth, the Lady of Capt. Sir James Alex. Gordon, K. 0.8 of a (latrine , . ..April 10, at .I.ympston, in Devon, the I.a.iy of Lietavnaut- Colonel William Power, of the Royal Artillery, of a son . • March 16, at Rome, the Lady of John Craufurd, Esq. of Auchennarnes, of a son. Sunday, in Park-street, the Lady of Sir Tyrwhitt Jones, Bart. ' of a daughtet. . Saturday, atChis Lordship's house, in Portland-place, Lady Ravenswords el a daughter. - MARRIED. Wednesday, by special license, William Henry Armstrong, Esq. late of the 55th Foot, to Josephine Catherine, only daugh ter of Strbastiab Gonsalez Martinez, Esq. of Euston-square. Lately; at St. George's Clinrch, Ilanover-squ ire, Capt. John Rutledge Kell, 2d or Queen's, to Miss E. Chantbtrlayne, third daughter of Mrs. Chamberlayne, of Brighton. Thursday, at Warding, Sussex, W. H. Darby, Esq. eldest sea of John Darby, Esq. of Leap Castle, in Ireland, and of Markly, in that county, to Laura-Charlotte, daughter of EJ. Cnrteis, .Mq. M.P. for the county of Sussex. Thursday, at Chichester, Peter Charles Racquet, Captain in the 2d Regiment of die Garde Royale, Paris, to Miss Johnson. of Salisbury. Tuesday se'nnight, in the Chapel of the Royal Hospital, sear Dublin, the Rev. J. H. Singer, F.T.C.D. to hfaty, eldest daughter of the Rev. 41. Crofton. DIED. On Saturday last. at Teddington, JOlll2 Stephenson, Kn. of Lombard-street, Banker, aged 60 years. The 51st ult. aged 27, Mr. John Cogau;iurgeon,lbaratau. Thursday, at Pines Hill, Birchanger, Colonel Welsh, in the led year of his age. On the sth inst. at Dorchester, of as apoplectic fit, W. Chat. mondeley, Esq. son of G. J. Cholmondeley, Esq. Iteeeiver-Ge neral of the Board of Excise. 'At Gateside, Hamilton,. on the sth inst. aged 27, Mrs. Win tosh, wife of Capt. Wlntosh, late of the 42d Regiment. Wednesday, Mr.. Hilliar, of Stourton, was thrown from his horse near Wincanton,..and was.so much injured that he nevcr spoke afterwards. His marriage was to have taken place on an early day. April 1, at Chipping-Sodbury. after a long and severe illness, Mary Anne, daughter of Mr. William Higgs, of the Swan Inn. Some months since, the deceased underwent the painful opera tion of having a tumour taken off her side, which weighed upwards of !Whs. The disease, however, again returned, and carried off its victim. 4.4 I — - a- — NAILS Tit ll DA'reA SR. DIM ARS. Ml 4 Dublin 1 0 Frinte .• 1 • 0 Waterford 3 0 Hatnburgb 8 0 Guernsey aodJeroey 0 i Pleaders . 0 0 Lisbon . 0 0 .Joinaks 0 0 liolland .1 . p Ginty:lllllrib 0 0 New 2ork - 0 0 . Leeward Wands 0 .0 - ......r .. ......v.r..7• 44. LONDON ; hinted and published by Lsiv Kum, Pickett place, Tcairk-Bar. .T-~. ,: : 7 - k I ;, I . i ~ L 4 • 1 1 I- 4 • I ( 1