Star. — London, England, 1808-06-02 00:00:00

-Ntroffi - The 'rounds open wh;elt mat a distinetine has been adtnitted in later times, and upon which., for the course of nearly a century, the Creivit has forborne to instruct the Commanders of its ships of war, to search foreign ships of war for deserter., I have al. ready had the honour to explain to you : and you will have per eeived that those grounds are wholly inapplicable to ships in the merchant service. RELAfI TO AMERICA. The following is an opy of the Let•er of hTr. Seeretasi• CottNytto to Mr. Mum RO, vrlach we made only slight mention in our Piper of'Tuesday Foreign Office, Sept. 23, 1407. SIII—I have laid before the King, my master, the letter which I had the honour to receive front you) on the 3th of this month. That a foreign power will not, knowingly, retain in its national service, mariners the natural-born subjects of his Majesty, who have been recalled by public proclamation, may be regarded as a presumption asilling out of the hostile nature of the aet, and out of the probable consequences to which such-an act of hostility most lead. • flu. with respect to merchant vessels, there- is no such pre sumption. When mariners, subjects of his Majesty, are em ployed in the private service of foreign individuals, under private civil contracts, the King's subjects, and the foreign individuals with whom they contract to serve, enter into engagements incon sistent with the duty of his Majesty's subjects towards him ; but to those engagements the Government of the foreign nation has not made itself a party. In such cases, the species of redress which the practice of all tittles has admitted and sanctioned, is that of taking those subjects at sea out of the service of such foreign individuals ; and recalling them to the discharge of that previous and paratnottnt duty, which they owe to their Sovereign and to their country. Before I proceed to observe upon that part of it which relates more immediately to the question now at issue between err two Governments, I aio corn, mantled, in the first instance, to express the surprise which is felt at the total omission of a subject, upon which I had already been commanded to apply to you for information—the Proclamation purported to. have been issued by the President of the United States. Of this paper, when last I addressed you upon it, you professed rot to have any knowlelge beyond . what the ordinary channels of public information afforded, nor any authority to declare it to be authentic. I feel it an indispensible duty to renew my enquiry on this subject. The answer which I may receive from you is by no means unimportant to the settle ment of the discussion which has arisen from the en counter between the Leopard and the Chesapeake.— The whole of the question arising out of that transac tion, is in fact no other than a question as to the a mount cf reparation due by his Majesty for the un authorised act of his Officer : and you will, therefore, readily perceive, that in so far as the Government of the United States have thought proper to take that reparation into their own hands, and to resort to measures of retaliation, previously to any direct ap pliCation to the British - Government, or to the British Minister in America, for redress ; in so far the Bri tish Government is entitled to take suLh measures into account, and to consider them in the estimate of re paration which is acknowledged to have been crigi nallv due. The total exclusion of all ships of war belonging to one of two Isligerent parties, while the ships of war of 'the other were protected by the harbours of the neutral pessvcr, would furnish no light ground of complaint against that neutral, if considered in any other point of view than as a measure of retaliation for previous injury ; and, so considered, it cannot but be necessary to take it into account in the adjust ment of the original dispute. I am, therefore, dis tinctly to repeat the inquiry, whether you arc now enabled to declare, Sir, that the Proclamation is to be con•cidered as the authentic act of your Government? and if so, I am furthr to inquire whether you are authorised to notify the intention of yotir Govern ment to withdraw that Proclamation on the know ledge of his Majesty's disavowal of the act which occasioned its publication ? The light in which you are directed to represent Admiral Berkeley's conduct, and the description which you give of the character of the measure imputed to him; that he acted as if he bad the power to make war and to decide the causes of war," sufficiently evince the necessity of comprehending is this diuus sion, all the circumstances which hive led te, or have followed the action with the Chesaputke. Undoubtedly the attack upon a national ship of war, is an act of hostility; and the very essence of the charge against Admiral Berkeley as you repre.ent it, is the having taken upon lsimself to Commit an act of hostility without the previous authority of his Government. That the CUITii: of this right involves some of the dearest in terests of Grim Britain ' your Government is ready to acknow h•dge, aad bas accordingly anthorized you to propose certain re gulations, which you apprehend would be equivalent in their effect for the preservation of the interests concerned. There will be no indisposition here to entertain at a proper time, the.discussion of such proposed regulations. But when you recollect thitt many proposals to this effect have already been brought forward, and have been found wholly Inadmissible; when you have yourself recently had occasion to experience the diffi culty of framing any satisfactory arrangement upon the subject ; with all the anxiety which is properly felt by both Governments for the speedy adjustment of the difference between them, and for the " healing of that deep wound which you state to have been inflicted on the national honour of the United States ;" surely it is not well advised to make the termination of that difference and the healing of that wound, dependent wholly on the complete suc cesa of an attempt, which has already been made so often, and se!tich has hitherto uniformly failed. Your own masoning thews that you are aware of the more than ordinary difficulty which must attend any arrangement for the prevention of desertion, between two notions, whose similarity of manners and habits, and whose identity of language, Interpose so many inipctlinients to the disairoithtion of " national cha racter." To there circumstances. and not, as you seem almost to insist:- ate, to any peculi.ir harshness towards the United States, it is owing, that the exercise of this right, as with respect to them, is nece,sarit:.• more frequent than with respect to any other nation ; and is felt I, s , th..in to be more rigid and vexatious. But /hese circumstance, cannot furnish as argument for the suspension of the ext rcise of the right with respect to America, unless it be contended that multiplicity of frauds, and difficulty of d et ecti o n, ar: reasons against suspter,m, or motives fur acquie,:cence. As little fouudation is there for the complaint that the prac tice has grown out of the recognition of American indepen dence; and that the character of that event is . .ffected by its con tinuance. It is needless to repeat, that these rights existed in their ful lest force for ages previous to Co. establislunent of the Uni ted Statcs of America as an independent Government ; and it would be difficult to contend that the recognition of that inde pendence can have operated any change in that respect ; unless it can be strewn, that in acknowledging the Government of the Uni ted States Great Britain virtually abdicated her own rights, as a naval power; or unless there ware any express stipulations, by which the ancient and presumptive usages of Great Britain, foun ded in the soundest principles of natural law, though still enforced arain,t other ludependent nations of the world, were to he sus pended whenever they might come in contact with the interests or the feelings of the American people. I would now recall your attention to the consideration of the question respecting the late transaction between the Leopard and the Chesapeake, which, till the receipt of your letter, I imagined to be the only question actually in discussion hetwaien us ; and in consideration of the delicacy and pressing importance of which, we had, by common consent, .waved the consideration of all other matters pending between our two Governments. Into the discussion of this question I am prepared to enter ; with what dis position, on the part of his Majesty's Government, to consult the feelings and the honour of the Government of the United States, it is not necessary for• me here to declare, for you yourself have done justice to the sincerity of that disposition. he difficulties in the way of such adjustment are already smoothed, by the disavowal voluntarily offered, as the very onset of the discussion, of the general and unqualified pretension to search ships of war for deserters. There remained only to ascer tain the facts of the particular case, and to proportion the repaia. tion to the wrong. Is the British Government now to understand, that you, Sir, are not authorized tamer into this question separately and dis chiefly.; without having obtained, as a preliminary concession, the consent of this country to enter into discussion with respect to the practice of searching merchant vessels far deserters ? The provocation which may have led to quell an act, without such previous authority, if it cannot justify, may possibly estenu ate if: at the steps which have been - *len in r,eprisal, though they cannot alter the character of the original act, may and do Materially affect every question concerning the reparation claimed for it. On this ground it is, that, while lam commanded to re peat neyou (what you consider as so satisfactory), that the gene ral and unqualified pretension to search ships of war for deserters is not asserted bytitis country, 1 am precluded from concurring in' the inference, that therefore " the national character of the men who were violently taken from on board the Chesapeake makes no part of the present question." If the right to search ships of war for deserters is Dot insisted upon by this country, It is' not because the employment and the detention of British mariners on board the national ships 'of any tit-ate are considered as less injurious towards Groat Britain, than their employment on board of merchant vessels (a prispositiOn which would be manifestly absurd): it is not intended to allow, that the sailors of Great Britain may be justly, employed against her consent, in foreign ships of war; but merely that* redress is, in that ease, to be sought for by Goiernment • froin Govern •nt ; and not to be summarily enforced by the unauthorized Officer of any of his Majesty's ships of war. rt follows from this reasoning, that not only the " national character of the men taken out of the Chesapeake is matter for consideration, bnt that the reparation to be made by the British Government to that of the United States, would depend, among ssiher circumstances, on the question whether an act, which the El - iris} , Government would be judified in considering as an act Of hosility, had been committed by the Government of the United States fin refusing to discharge British seamen in their national service), previonsly to th • commission of an act of hostility of an Officer of his Majesty. The act of th , British Officer would still be an unauthorized act, and as such liable to complaint and disapprobation ; but the case, as between Government and Government,would be mate rially varied. At the same time that 1 offer to you this explana tion of the principles upon which his Majesty has authorized me to discuss with you the subject of your representation, and that I renew to you the assurance of the disposition to conduct that dig erssion in the most amicable form, and to bring ittn a conclusion satisfactory to the honour, and to the feelings of both countries ; it is matter of regret that you should havebeen instructed to an twa to the demand or reparation for the attack of the Leopard urn, the Chesapeake, any proposition whatever respecting the search for Briish seamen in merchant vessels ; a subject which is wholly unconnected with the case of the Leopard and the Chesa peake., and which can only tend to complicate and embarrass a discussion, in itself 4f sufficient delicacy and importance. Whether any arran ges•rnt can be devised by which this prac • tice may admit of natidiScation, without prejudice to the essential rights and interests if (;rest Britain, Is a questioti which, as I have already said, the Brirish Goverrina.m may, at a proper sea son, be ready to entertain ; but whether the consent of Great Britain to the entering into such discussion shall be extorted as tbe price of an amicable adjustment, as the condition of being admit t:d to make honourable reparation for au injury, is a question of I quite a different sort, and one which can be answered no other wise than by an unqualified refusal. I earnestly recommend to you, therefore, to consider, whether the instructions which you have received from your Government may not leave you atliherty to come to an adjustment of the case of the leopard and th• Che sapeake, Independently of the other question with which it ap pears to have been unnecessarily connected. If your instructions leave you no discretion, I cannot press you to act in contradiction to them. In that ca, there can be no ad- 1 se vantage in pursuing a discussion which you are not authorized to conclude ; and I shall have only to regret, that the disposition of his Majesty to terminate that difference amicably and satisfacto rily, is for the present rendcrod unavailing. In that case his Majesty, in pursuance of the disposition of which he has given such signal proofs, will lose no time in send ing a Minister to .Ninerica, furnished with the necessary-instruc tions aid powrr' for bringing this unfortunate dispute to a eon elusion, consistent with the harmony subsisting between great Britain and the United States. But in order to avoid the incon venience which has arisen from the mixed nature of your instruc tions, that Minister will not be empowered to entertain, as con nected with this subject, any proposition respecting the search of, merchant vessels. it will, however, be Ear more satisfactory to Lis Majesty to learn, that upon re-consideration you think yourself authorized to separate the two questions. J hope you will allow me to express, at the same time, the sin cere pleasure which I should feel in having to treat with you, Sir, yersonally, for the re-estatalishinent of a good uc..ierstancling be tween our two countries. . . In stating the ground. upon which your Government evert with coofidence that " the whole subj.xt of impressment. soall ; be taken up at this gime,' and that to making the reparoion g Which was claimed for the par.iralar injury alledged to have been sustainvd by the United States in the Fate unfortunate trans- g action off the Capes of %irginia, " a remedy shall be provided far the whole evil ;" rat appear to have been directed to assume that this act of violence (such as you describe ft) is the natural and almost necessary result of the practice of impressment of British seamen from the merchant vessels of other states • and to repro- # sent the partirolar transaction, and the general question of ins ressment as " identified in the feelings and sympathies of your Nation, as *ell :a in the sentiment of your s:overnment." " With every atteation due to the feelings of the people of the Abated States, I ant cure you will readily allow that those feelings cannot properly be "cnsidered as affecting the merits of the case. The first ebullitions of " National sensibility," may very tutu rally have communicated an impulse to the proceedings of the Ainericau Government ; but it cannot be expected that they should guide thedeliberate opinions and conduct of the Govern anent with which you have to terse. I would farther observe to you, that your Government ri.nnor reasonably claim any advan tage in argument from the expressed sense of its own people, un less it be prepared at the some time to take upon itself a respor.si lelity (which there is no desire of attributing to it) far the outrage and indecency, with which, upon the Lite occasion, that expression, ras, in too many instances, been accompanied. It is better for tempt-me reasoning, and assuredly it is more advantageous for the Government of the United States, that the consideration of popular feeling should be wholly omitted in this discussion. The sight and the practice of which you arc iostructed to corn yl~tn, as . irreconcileuble with justice, and intolerable in all their far: s, have been exercised by Great Britain from the earliest ages p the British naval power; men without any qualification or es (quo* in favour of national ships of war". I h..ve the hoooor to be, with the highest ecasideration, Sir, your most obedient humble sErvant, (signed) GEORGE CANNING. LCCI.J.ISIASTICAL. and ACADEMICAL PROMOTIONS. OS vo■a, MAT 22.—0 n the 25th instant, the Rev. Thomas Boykin Kingdon, of Exeter College, and the Rev. D. Hughes, of Jesus College, M. A. and Students in Divinity, were admitted Bachelors in Divinity. Rev. George Frome, of Merton College; Rev. Arthur Gibson, of Queen's College ; Rev. Thomas Ilarris, of Trinity College; and Rev. Charles Dutne, of Ballinl College, were admitted M. A. Messrs. Reginald Wynniatt, of Queen's College; John Bower, of Exeter Coßege ; William John law, of Christ Church ; Edward Hughes and George li.rries, of Jesus Colkge ; John Miller, gf Worcester College; John Freeman and Edward Jodrell, of Tri nity College; Joseph Charles Helm, of \Vadham College; James Harris,. R. Fetkerston 'estop, and John Roberson, of St. John's College ; Thomas I.ewin, of Corpus Christi College ; and eiamuel Ilolworthy, of University College; were admitted Bachelors of Ats. Yesterday the Rev. Charles Ball. M. A. and Student in Divi nity of St. John's Corker, and Chaplain on the Madras Establish ment, was admitted Bachelor and Doctor in Divinity. • Stephen Lushington, Esq. B. C. L. of All Souls College, was admitted Doctor in Civil Law, Grand Compounder. The Rev. George Henry Templer B. A: of Merton College, was admitted Master of Arts, Grand Compounder. Mr. Edward l'revenen, of Pembroke College, was admitted Bachelor of Arts. Meisra. Glynn, Bull, Law; and Richards, of As.:eotanigiAftwall?Ool,:ase cloaca S4ents of GhristChurch, . , . . It. MERMAN'S QUTT .• ,A • loot proood, that nothing Of the prefect day c ap No. • ' 'l 3 Ht talkie of this' Infaillibk Medicine teat bee s it in all tbe.different ca a certain rasa,' The fo ll owing Letter, :shown leg in the most iMie- oimpaitiosi w ith and 14 , t . r 04,4 • pendent constitutional principles.. and in 'facts pAg'lllf exciting the painful feelitigs and cacrettre -that ttatif a n,,, ; ,,. e which it cffeelually cure+ er c interesting to humanity, dras adte,ssecl by the present infiqut debilitning the coaftiturion id' any degree , n a i i7 t : active and intelligent Sheriff o London, to Sir thirty Se- tin that, years. all th, wring confinement from Inifir , :e ft, or reftrldion h i di et W EL ROMILLY, on the occasion of bringing in his new radical virtues netliefe i e . Droos have proved their chili Dill relative to the Penal Laws . We hope it will have F . , ii p ty ab o li f c b,, ap th pri fe ar e t ,, iou th f c o ; more provea sa4,.rtai:l46 reftorati,e, the desired effect anticipated by the worthy Sheriff they she debility is produced by too live ufe of Mercury, A LETTER pleafures, or the effeate of a warm climate to trav e ll ers. and that lini n g a b roa d. Th e y cannot be recomnieeded to o ft eongly IRON MR RICHARD PHILLIPS TO SIR' SAMUEL. ROMILLIts g thole who' will receive a fate. ftweely. and complete care in all e t° ll Satt--Thc execution of my office saf t hleeir of LiandottandMid ftubborn falcate, Mad carry_ weaktufa that affeats the Maeda as 4 ilksex having brought me into Mutual with many of the evils o rgan, of urine By its efficacy many w , met thee bi t , rae Which you are seeking to remove in the Administration. of the then, who for yeart had been deprived citthat Mirphiels Criminal Law, I cannot resist niy inclination to congratulate you , Sold wholefale arid retail at Mr. Butler's, No. 4. talicsyfitle an „ in the very useful and honourable responsibility which you have net of Part rimiter-row, and retail by Bairn. PortfMouth: taken upon yourself. • p o rtf e a ; Wills and IL titers, Plymouth; Peck, Hull; lab. I am aware, Sir, of the difficulties which necessarily preterit tin; Baxter. and Macdonald, Glafgow ; Batter. Smith and Ka. thernselves in opposition to any measure of Reform, or even to . derton, Edinburgh and by moil country nicactoe venders, pi any new regulatiolis which propose simply the correction of abuses, Dawes. it 2 .. 9d„ each , w i t h amp l e a u re a k „.. that have crept (corruptly or inadvertently) into practice. am,- - - • -•-• therefore, disinclinedao urge any thing which should add to your I RUTLER'S IiES FORA'CIVE TOOTH -PO-14 claims of concession front interested persons, and to the difficulties 1...1 DER, here offered to the ufe of the Public at lirge a. v rat 4 of achieving your object; but I should exceedingly blame myself t h e circle o f D r . P. M , Dimifdale's partieular aei ; aaintarrce, and hereafter, if I omitted to c o mmunicate to you a few rAnta of mad- Nobility and Gentry. his paticotkana its virtues juftly appren a ‘ practice which may be corrected by -being incidentally introduced e,l ; but a certain delicacy prevented him from publicly a nuound k, among the Clauses of your ISM. this preparation. Mr. Butler has come itltO poffiflion of tht (me ta l I shall briefly erenmerate them, not conceiving it neaessary to recipe, and he begs to allure thole afflieted with decayed or og ee ; enter into any detailed reasonings to one so intimately aattuaint,d f ive teeth and gums, that they may rely on its effi cac y and hit s attire troirm ot which any one may beconeleced. bya as you are with the laws and Constitution of the C+untry, with fair and candid tri.d nie hoe. Of the properties of tics Trout the principles of natur, • justice, and with time feelinas of htima nity. Powder. its (lent t; at property is jell !efficient to clear assay thrift First.—No person, before trial, shopld be pot in irons, or b deltrudive particle. ot acid which ge.nerally adhere to the gums; 'objected to greater severity than is neceasary to detain his person I and in the inter:dee, of the teeth without injuring - the furnace of dfl the next gaol deliv e ry. E very man comm i tte d to Newgitte either healing fore..eG in the farmer. and proaNaing a new ma, for trial is, however, immediately put in irons ; and ancient eus- me i 0 pear l y whitturfs , where It h a . been ia jnre, i corrededan tom has so complet e ly s a n c ti o n e d thi s p ract i ce , that it i s in vain for the latter. It has a pkafant and agreeable eslour and is with a l fa an annual officer, like a Sheriff, to seek its entire abatement as an perfectly ingot-cm, that it may be eaten without njary. Theta !flair within his own jurisdiction. Several ameliorations of the aininguiffilng cluradlerittics of its sanative cfttets wit fiiperte t ay, condition of this class of prisoners hate, however, been recently have procured it the unbounded approtiation of the Q,a en, .be effected by myself and colleague. Princeffea, the Emeirefs of Risffii, the Ducheffet of York, Bedford. Secondly.—No person, before trial, ought to he denied the free Gordon, Leeds. Eutiand,and moll of the E'rrtglifli and toreigu No access of his friends, witnesses, and brad advaera ; yet, just as is bility„ many of whom recommend it with a.ireiration, as a need this principle, it is violated in the c ares o f a n persons, committed fary appendage to the toiler, and they 4o bat common juf. t o th e Cold-bath-fields Prison, and to most of the new prisons it, eke herein , le - ce it imparts a firmer& and beautiful minds toth e the country, in which no access to a prisoner detained fur trial h gums to the breath the molt deledtable iweetnefs and If afesicon. allowed, except by special permission of a Magistrate-. nanny as dircalad, will randerthe teeth tiros and white, and n,e- Thirdly.—Every person committed for trial ought to hsveidur- vent the tooth ach from returning to thof t who have been liabk to ingtbe period of his or her detention, all adequate subsistence.— its molt baneful alas. In Newgate, the sole allowance is b u t f our t een oun c es o f bread Prepared and fold wholefale ant retail by Mr Butler, No. 4 , p er d a y, and this is given to every prisoner indistrbainatcly. It Cheapfid e corner of Paternoster-row, Lon lon, and of moil coma , ought certainly to be increased to twenty ounces, to those at least try Medicine Venders and Perin ours, in boars at 2 4 . 94. each. who have not been tried. That excellent and experienced I.egis- Of whom may he had, Butler's improved Silver-wired limit. lator of Prisons, Sir G. Paul, allows twenty ounces to aft the ptsf- ftruihia,price Is. each. tons confined in the Monet atersbire prisons. 'I he ill consequences of an inadequate allowance must he obvious: the parties are obliged to expend their small la ..ans, to pawn their clothes, and to have recourse to other shifts to subsist themselves (at:d per haps their dependent families also) during the unproductive period of their detatition before trial, a period too in width they usually find themselves deserted by Their frierds; and when the day of trial comes, they have no money left with which to em ploy Counsel, compensate wit:A:sacs, iitc. Le. Fourthly.—Ever y prisoner detained on the commitment of a Magistrate for trial ought to be instantly discharged as soou as the Grand Jury (on the f X.polde evidence which it hears) have thrown out the BiII, or in other words, havd declared on' that ex-parte evidence, that there exists no ground of accusation. It. is the custom in the Old Bailey Court, and I believe in some other Courts to detain persons relative to whom the Grand Juryhave rejected the Bills of Indictment, till the Grand Jury is discharged, which is always many days after, and might best - vet-al weeks. Nothing is more contrary to the letter and spirit of the laws of England than this practice, yet such persons are constantly de tained on the impertinent ground that there errs ke other charges against them. The obligation lies, of course, it, the Court and el e prosecutors to adduce such new chargas immediately, and persons ought not to be detained under every severity of pline on speculatiam only, after their acquittal by a Grand Jury; persons too, over whom neither a Court ea' Criminal Law, nor any other power in England, has any legal right to exercise any severity whatever. The 14th Geo. LI. formally recognizes this right of immediate diseharge in persons relative to whom a Grand Jury has rejected the bill, but unfortunately it is implied by the terms of that Act that die party is to be brought into open Court; consequently, any arbitrary Judge has it in his power to : render nugatory the security of the subject against unjust imprison ' ment, and thus to overturn, as it were, the very corner-stone of Public Liberty. The power of discharge ought to be executive in • the Sheriff, inonediately after the Grand Jury have made their return of ignoramus in open Court, except in cases where detainer is formally lodged on specific grounds. Fifthly.—The mode of paying the Salaries of Gaolers by exac tions from the most destitute objects, under the name of Gaol Fees, (w.hat alone would be proper) such fees should be under Le gislative regulations, or abolished altogether, and Gaolers paid nut of the county rate's like other servants of the public. Theft...retched objects who are conlidered as de. Tving the King's pardon have a demand made on them of 31. loss before they tai leave the Gaol of Newgate. Those petty offenders who are sentenced to pay a ' gine of is. or to suffers slight punishment and them be discharged, are obliged to pay 255. fees before they can obtain such discharge. Debtors are in like manner called upon fur es. hod. after they have xhausted their last resources during their confinement, orin com pounding with their Creditors. A vciy slight consideration vt•ill evince the cruelty of a system by which those are called upon to contribute to the salary of a public officer, who, urged by every , species of privation, have exhausted all their means, and the ' greater part of whom belong to those classes of society, who in their. most fluorishing circumstances, ire seldom able to accumu ' late such sums as they are called upon topay, at a time when A jes ter policy would glee rather than take away, and se hest they are, objects rather for the fostering hand of dimity than for the gripe of extortion. Mr. - SIR SAMUEL RogE.Lrs 811 L. . lAIPOitTANT DIsCOVERY:. T HE A d vantage the Public must always deri , -e from regularly educated professional men directing almost. exclusively their studies to one species of malady, was never mare clearly denionanued than liy the unexampled succe.ss 'which has attended th,: administration of their new remedy, and the extraor dinary cures It has perrortned. For a long series of years, Bessie. OCR at c and Co.! Surgeons, formerly i.e his lidajesty's service, have made the Venereal Dises.e'the particular object of their iovisr gation, and are !soppy-in having di/COW:red a medicine superior to mercury in the cure of that complaint; it is sufficient to observe that the diens of this remedy arc diametrically opposite to those of mercury, for though it completely eradicates every vestige d the virus, in. its most continued stages, yet It does not M the Lear injure' the constitution ; on the contrary, it renurates the systes. in all its natural functiims, promotes appetite, and facilitates di gestion : thus iti4t ad of reducing a strong and vigorous eoruits then tifi'theitOjittftif: eohditiun chat mercury does, it not only pet. 4crves that con4tinition in its {win* ive state, bat restores a wok and 44nlitated ace to its natural strength and vigour. plumber h is instances are on recent record of the superior efficacy of tint! medicine, hs inherent and specific virtues acting as a perpetce corrective to bodily siehtlity, whether proceeding from an excess of conjugal or illicit pleasure, or front the more insidious, though. not less destructbre, isedulg. race of incautious youth of both sexes in a certain pernicious habit. Amidst the sicelaricholy variety of disorders which are the enti.eqniasce of this solitary vice, there are 'loin: more afflicting than that dietrc . seing state of alebiiity and doe liciency whicit'prevents or embitters the matrimonial state ; the unhappy sufferer broods over Li% mi , fortune, ashamed toseek lief, until he is reduced to ;uchirstait: of weakness is to render life oppressive. To such persons it must be a consoling reflez tion to know, that they may now, by a new infallible mode el treatment, be te.totetl to that gr,attst of all human blessings, a strong, nianly and vi•or.ms constitution. . lu all cases of debility,sh fu4ency, from whoteile ttantearitio& as well as in every ~.pecies of venereal infection, Messrs. Curies and Co. . may be con,ultcd by patienti of tither sex with V* greatest secrecy and honour, actiMir house, No. 107, Hatter- Garden. Patients in the- country deserihing the rirtierdors of their complaint-% by letter post paid, enclosing a Rank vote, wilt have the necessary medicine ap Atkivice sent to any part isf the kingdom. . • N 0.107. fiat! e r Garaloss. ITJ TIiOMAS TAYLOR, t.ritz. • No. 0, NEW BRIDGE-srittEr. LONDON. 110 NOUN BE'Tr leave Oilnform you, that ever sinte the - yeetr 1793,1 had b...en afflicted With the Lars Venerea ; tdhi b , frota ' its obltitsately resisting every. course of Medicine prescribed by t.Fe most etnimert of the faculty . here, and undergoing several sevac courses of salivation, and twice discharged from the Hospital, with little relief, would *pear tore of the most inveterateaature. Is the spring of lair year my disorder hid gat ,Aksuch a heal, at nearly to ptrea period to existeffde. I had a large Weer on the crown of mg. head, one on each arni, and my legs, were brutes' out in a trightfal manner; my tight Was dreadfully ilfalnibliand hid-been in a atate of ulceration for the List seven yeansrruy IC# had also two nodes upon it,seras witty much eliscoiou . rud, ant v 4. me such excruciating . pain, particularly whets, Warm. nearly to deprive me of Asst Oh this lamenralik state,: tarn iv, coour.s sided by efit by them liefte,; tb t3kt.')•uvr-i.eiltek PattinPilasi,;Whieft Pre*" to do on the etch May;. in thir.ntstrse. of i a,..fortnight L.bcn to : receive benefit—in little. more ttiart.a . stonitb the *yrs had and inns were soundly.heatedsoon After, tlse sores Mi rt - let. healed also: -leaving; : however, cot slilesable disestiOnfa ton its the skin, and pain in the bone of the'leffi Ittessiesg of God, arid a /idle lonasyr perseverance in ronrinvalnr-• ble Medicine, subsided L the triodes dispersing s the skirt%galnit4 its natural hue, and the nocturnal pains grltchsally goiniciff bocame, by your liberal advice and nicilicine, perfettly fair - -feud my former camplaints--have recovered..my fonnerJapirkee /0 - 41 strength, and am becomijolli and fit,in Which at atrbajtitz. o.c- tinued Many months.. to the astonislith,t!nt of ad wis p inew.nv . ,l ant at a loss in whet towns to eagritas teKgratieuife' Sl4; for the good of other suffering morals; toiludietbis iirli"•cose ir public as possible, as I shall bit ieeffaccisfon-:-.1.1 so sitrimf y -a will greatly Oblige, Sir, "yant itrattftd d'adlekt very hump. ..; • vans,' • ' ••,:. • 4Lr.X..hiUrs KER. Swan's get! ~.Hig4-4tre!t, Edinjoirgh. Witnesses' to abOve s Curi.,' John Themptuti,NO. 3; Neve r roult±inarket, Edinburgh. John•M'lntosh, Old Assembly Close, Fdieburgh. Prepared and sold by the sole Proprietor, Thomas Member of t Ile Royal College of Surgeons In London, at his hones,. • No. 9, New Bridge-street ; where, after a constant residevm s je, more than an year., in a practice particularly directed ter Vr'or • Cure of Venereal Complaints, and ;those incideutil Parts of CseneratiOn, with that inviola;ik seerecr-wideb;pi;v : of his prafesiion should always observe its Suds •: . sals ‘ iiita• ters himself, the advice and assistance .hi',:grafnittinq•aqt* nesters to persons taking this Medicine willbe'estettned,byz6s cerning Public , as anadvantage seldom l iittainedaanki'void of ad ambiguity. They are also sold by hieappointmentoCilitt Octfurnet's, 35, St. Albans-street, 11411Vkall ; eke 4(ay-shop,, No. 103, ford.street ; Mr. Dis.borougks . No. V;1141 . -atrete-itig, nearly op-• polite the Monument ;herby one pariah •in every consideishlt • town in Fngland: dee. in boxes.ordris. Qd. each, sealed up with full and plaits diri.ctions ; whereby , persons of either set snag fire th ems , Wee wit,ls east and aeerccv. N. I.t.gyety lion snid in preat Britain is sealed rp with aster-, i on whickby favour of tbeConstnissioners, is printed,at theS: aicp triSte—t: TiYlox, No. 9, New Bristeisureet--to iniit..te v. bi--b si felony, and ail ethers are counterfeit. Sixthly.—Our rank abound in miserable objects wito have committed enormities during periodical fits of insanity, or urishr the influence of settled mania, and these unfortunate persons arc, as the lase now stands, subject to perpetual imprisontnent in the common gaol, to the constant annoyance : and often to the great terror of the other prisoners ; we have now six persons of this deAcription in the yards of Newgate. Does not Humanity im periously demand that a public liosplial should he built (or the re ception of such maniacs, and that they should be treated as ob jects of compassion rather than as criminals ? It appears to me, Sir, that no person who feels and understands the ftee and liberal spirit of the Laws and Constitution of England,. will for a mo ment hesitate to give you his warmest support in favour of such clauses of your new Bill, as shall embrace the preceding objects. If to these regulations you can unite those points which are pecu liarly your own, and can also provide, that, under certain capital charges, the accused on adducing proofs of poverty should have Counsel assigned him ; and that witnesses, in all criminal cases, should be examined separately, or be admitted into Court only one at a dine, you would introduce that perfection 111t0 the prac tice of our criminal Courts, which the law and the Constitution suppose to exist, of which it is unquestionably susceptible, and to wards which it is ou:dutytoattempt everypossiblr approximation. Seriously anxious that these points should be fully considered, at a moment when a Bill having collateral vi,:ws, is under the consideration of the Legislature, I have the honour to be, Sir, Your very humble Servant, (Signed) R. PHILLIPS. Hampstead, May 12, 1808. On the 30th ult. at Searrington, Nottinghamshire, the Lady of Captain Robert Hall, of a daughter. DIED. On Friday,the 27th ult. Clement Winstanley, Esq. of Braunsto-- House, Vice-Lieutenant for the Couuty of Leicester, aged 69. On the 21st ult. after a short inners ' aged 25, the Hon. and Rev. Pierce Butler, t hird son of the E ar l of Carrick, and Rector of Kik skeer, in the Dix: se of Neath. Tuesday last, at her house in Green-street, the Right Hob. Lady Anne Lumley Saimderson, daughter of Thomas, the third Earl of Scarborough, and aunt to the present Earl of Scarborough, and to Earl Ludlow. Her Ladyship was in her 80th year. ,Lately, after a severe and fingering illness, G. E. Ramus, F.sq. srhis villa, at Fulham. . . . HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. I.ON.LIEYN t Piinted and published b) LEVEL KEN I*, 140 , 11hig a7 „ mites i nez trebury Place, Lambeth) at the STAR-Orsic•, N.). 1, t.'sre.. 12 minutes eta _Urges Published ako it die :A R• 0 fICE, Tonirlfgrar; - !!!-- 'ltrtinEtt 6041] w* fir, MESSRS. AS rbMORRO'W EVE 'e preformed at the Th The Sacs THE 1\ Compose:; b. li s ipslVocalPerfo rmeil MIS Mrs. LILA .12AHAM, Mr. VAUGI .c.ifY Sod of Part I. will be per Opera Seconds, on triAy; Messrs, Lindley, Cl .1134 of Part IL A Concert< La d e n Of the Band, hi r. AS Deers to be opened at Sir, epos 6s--Pit Ss. Od--Gat tickets to be had of Me: 11111tBadai•atzlet ; and of N 1 T tar the 1/...,„.„,„21.—.......es Islay be i ---• .11uTsurt EVE.--BitILI • -ler The Proprietors Agra.llll'S AMPHI 11 T 4.Prip. the patronage of th • Wales, ar %NCI-MORROW EV. )5 - ilk JUNE, will b e pn f , et eonsisting of Eques Oily, partieularly the Hunt rith dine, The popular Spt IkAL, introducing a inicroc kivatof the Prince Reges set Conic Songs by Mr. Jo asinade of the WITCHES Doors opened at half pas fits half past eight precise •.S. Various Novelties tv ---- THEATRES a • • ira. smitilsoN, or"- fonahte terms, (14;):11 perty.--Latter CP,t-Patui rford, :bill' meet not ANE THOUSAN-i • any Lady oft • nzl.l permanent Sit sat roil 7 w:der Gentleman for whop ihischablf "character, and Alinn will be lessened or it Appointment. Satisfactory liad the utmost bbnour and A letter addressed fhr C vent tad Coffee-house, Hol - ,VIX PRIZES OF TW TO BEGIN DRAM ticriARDSON,* Building. , ; Coxnhill, cross, respectfully &equal t(iy Tickers and Shares ar The SichacOe contains 6P .2 at • 4 'And 5,090 other Prizes 1-.- 14 7. /•:. • PRIZES Of 1' i ,„4 't , WIFT and 0 C ,0 7. 1 Charing-Cross, are 1)01 , e Lottery, to begin hotains the same num tfosil ? le the number of lever before known iii 1 '• The following Prize Ifices in the last Lotter 10291 240..13,8 ..140. 6,895 - 8,417 in the preceding si k w - - 184, Prize of .ell ' , Prizes of Ll,Ol ' • i E. Lists of the Pi redgratis at the s • . : . et t ,:t. ' c s e 8 4 s . ? 0, c r l n 2 1 , c do l ri a l y n epeA frn t vrteeituoneiapet alterative aNttßEeienw has itd7el ANTISODRBUI e e This rneli fera c n:t i g n ashltru e e4i:PcP i e° s eti;v7u n flill,l tylos. —and larger the King's Patent- Outside Wrapper pk. An allowance (,1 .• . . 1 —... 7t. Royal F: of aisiiactial a flit Moistening turisiset to the H of life ; prom o ) : . ore: it on bald pl , en that were bA ttO teplarly for three n frith hair. Caution.—As pro i . ui, to deceive, hay kuill and covers, pur tlg,that rack Bottit fe_tside wrapper, sig tVtdce,"—any with I..adies and Cent neglect, after bathi n e cral cue of the wa: 'Wed. Also, Gent ken to prevent the Bence) on account ling—this case is c colour sooner than Promotes whisk, e 1e containing four Sold 'Wholesale a ohn-street, Oxfot rfurner to his IS) etrumer; in her yley and BleW, ad Duke aid Du( d San, 41, St. Ctittrch-vaii ; Fla h . eapsicie . • Shaw dud Johnsni e, No. 65, ney, Hatton- Orit ; Tutt, Ellw, Dubl , t l ; I f•Mnbiargh ; rut fipal Perfumers I ht..otand.