Star. — London, England, 1808-07-28 00:00:00

- - it while she lived, that he was now obliged to' seek elsewhere. Lord Em.rNsoitoontt recapitulated the whole of the_ evidence, and made . several observations as he pro. seeded. As to the personal familiarity which the defendant had been at differed . times seen to use, in kis sing Mrs. Gregson, that circumstance was principally important as giving a character to the sort of intimacy which subsiited between than.. It was extraordinary that when he usually continued his visits so late as - nine, he should never hate staid to see the husband, with whom he was on terms of friendship, .and who usually returned a little ifter . nine. It _was a circum stance worthy of observation, that when he was even walking ill the shrubbery with her, and paying so great attention to, her at one time, he should return from the pilot he brought per to, alone and without coninteng, time attentions. As to the observation made by the Learned Counsel for the . Defendant, of the istkpreba bMty of a woman exposing heiself to be overheard by her maid in the kitchen, when she knew that every noise must be heard, it must be recollected that, at thie time she had prostituted herself to the embraces t4,a coachman, and had probaiily lost all regard to decency, or all other considerations, and that caution *hick a woman in other circumstances might be sup pueed' to feel. , In cases of this nature, however, Ju ries would not determine, on slight circurnstances,, th 4 the crime of adultery had been committed—but if circumstances appeared to them so strong and taut, that they could have no reasonable doubt 11,% minds hut that the fact was committed, it be their duty to sity so in their verdict,. and to award such d reasonable damages as the nature of Mo . ease seq_uire. . . . r The Jury retired for more than two hours-on thei return, they found for the' Plaintit—Damages, : One Shilling.- - .A burst o? applause ensiled. Lord Eit insortovoet.—" I will immediately commit the per ,.,,,atob who has been guilty of that indecency, if be is brought' bdore me. l line he is in view. Is there any Officer there who Saw .ha man who was guilty of this violation of decorumr—MK Under Sheriff, I do insist on your having-iersons to take notice of .those who misconduct themselves in Court ; if not, I shall fine, you severely." Mr. DMITT Sneartr.—" My Ldrd, there us six persons in COint fur' that purpose it this meiment." Lord Eziltasoxonon.—" Is there any one among them who saw the man who committed the ontrag.l - of the Officers.—" I did, my Lord." Lord ELLINPOROttutt.— " Bring him bitherimmediatelf, that I asay.fine him." Offiier.—" My Lord, be is run away." Lord Etrattacmoncs.—" Why did you not take hbn into custody?" Officer..—" I did eadeavotr to catch hint, but be nn away be ton I could do to." Lord E.t.tutsoentrcr.—" Do you know his perkier Oflter.." No, I do not, my Lord." Lord Esssssoaooce—" I desire a better attention . to deco- Vim, or I must set a high fine on the Sheriff—l will not endure this intuit to the public admlnistratton of justice. Let all the Officers come forward—l Shall impose a Modena fine on them, Dar I must not endure tins indoeorum." The Officer who bad answered before then came forward, and slid there was a number of perinue together when the clapping took plate, and it was inipsible for him tokake the person Who Mended, although he did endea*ohr. Lord 41-Sttebsocton---" TWA* quicken you I will Sue goo 5L far you ought, as tkehazord of your own life, to have • the offeodei', bpt if yotoad -brought him in, I should have fined bit at !twit 4!n times th ff i sam:" The Officer was convened' to pay the fihe imoiediately, or be imprisoned. Hit Lordship after ands observed, he bad much rather pay the' fine ant of his own pocket tban be put to the necessity of imposing' the fine—be Must do it to support the dignity of the Court ; but if the offieer` should Drd the offender between this and ntxt tam, he shall receive the fine: 1 COURT OF CHANCERY, JULY SOL • Krroattrr GSSZRAI; O. HICKS: This was - a motion arising upon an information filed b'y Lord - Redesdale, when Attorney General, at' the instance of Sir Christopher Hawkins and Lord De Dunstanville. The grounds on which the informa tion proceeded were these : Queen Elizabeth, in the: Mb year of her reign, had granted - letters patent for incorporating the - Hospitnt of St; Lawrence de Pon teby, near Bodmin, Cornwall, for the purpose of main taining 38 Lazars, or leprous persons, of both sexes, and had endowed the Hospital with various lands and messuages to the value of 1501. per annum for the, support of these Lazars. That speciei of - pestilence having fortunately become extinct, at least in this. country, the endowments of the Hospital had got into the hands of other people, who had no tort of claim under the charter of incorporation, and had cane into various hands by leases, ate. 'of " whom the De fendant Hicks was one. An information was filed against these persons by Lord Redeidale, whei At torney General, and the matter was then referred to a Master in Chancery, to inquirtyinto the appropriation, orthese funds, destined for charitable uses. From his report it appeared, that there had not been for a con iideiable period, and was not then, a sufficient num ber of persons who could establish any claim to the benefit of the charity, on the grottnd of their being lazars, the persons for whose benefit the charity was destined, and that the revenues of the charity had gone into other channels. • This report having come before the Chancellor, as the guardian of public charities, particularly th ose established by the Crown, it was .suggested before Lord Erskine, that as the grant was made by Queen Elizabeth, in virtue of her Duchy of Cornwall, the interests of the Prince of Wales, as Ddke of Cornwall,, were concerned. Mr. RICHARDS and Mr. BENTON now contended, that whether the Hospital was endowed by the Crown, or from the lands of the Duchy of Cornsvall,, yet still it was devoted to charitable purposes alone ; and since these purposes had happily become obsolete, it was proper either to receive a new direction or that the funds should revert to the original donor.— They submitted, however, that the lands and rues- . swages appropriated to the support of this incorpora ted charity did not revert to the donor or his heir; but retrained still allotted with -the charity to which they had been originally destined. They therefore sub mitted that the subject be referred anew to the Master, who should be ordered to draw out a new scheme ofl charity, for the support of which the funds might be applied. Sir A. Portaor appeared in behalf of the Prime of Wales, as Duke of Cornwall, and contended that as the grant of Elizabeth was of eertainlands, of her Duchy of Cornwall, the Crown could not prOperly be' considered as the donor ; and that if the property re verted to the heirs of the original donor, it mast re , vert to the Prince, as Duke of Cornwall. The Lotto CHANCELLOR observed, that, in the pie , seat stage, be he had nothing to do- with the question as it respected the riglets of his Majesty, or the ritacc ef Wales ; but there was this informality that would put a stop to further proceedings for the present, and that was, that the information ltad not been filed by the present Attorney General. The application was therefore postponed for some days, till the Attorney General could be consulted. ADNITRALTY COURT. DOCTORS' COMMONS, vsesnios, 'LILT se. This day the Right Honourable Sir WM. SCOTT, proceeded to the adjudication of the following cases : The Jane, Mix master.—This vessel, under American colours, laden with coffee, &e. seas bound to London, when captured.— Ship condemned, and further proof ordered with respect to the cargo. Margaret, Tnrgey master.—This American vessel was going in ballast from New York to Bourdeauz.. No claim being set up, the .Hip was Condemned. Aurora, Roeloffs master.—This Danish vessel, laden with va riotra merchandize, war on a voyage from Portugal to Amster. dam. The .que‘tion respected the property of the cargo, the greater part of which was pronounced to be Portuguese, and the unclaimed part condemned. Twende Wenner, Roeloffs master.—This was a Smyrna vessel, aden wick various merchandire.—The bulk of the cargo pro nounced to be Ottoman property. Victor, Jacobs master. r -This Knlphausen vessel, laden with sugar, coffee, &c. was bound from Gottenburgh to Amsterdam, at the time of capture. It appeared that she sailed under two li cences, one front the King of Sweden and the other front the King of Great Britain.—Ship and cargo restored. sgrl‘e.eartecin'umthbaetr idelitibveryliTft2nrelthilit:slwhaitiseissia.,ibjuat atestee ) m y f s or ty Col ing ost: s Y poke oun in g , b lh e a a t. f i t l :r ha vtald a i ex plained, gPe t h h ic a a t l th w e a p y iasn 'l ti le fE l w ef i t tneskn hiss lo ac n o gs wle in d e t th,wauthbaheaout d hay ing paid fur them, and that tbePlaintiffassociatedair • non-commissioned officers of the DrivereCorpi, at Cork, and got drunk with them ; he said the Plain tiff had made some arrangemedt for' the paytnent of the debts he . owed in Cork before he left it, and that the debts he owed were .not of any great amount. The SOLICITOR GENERAL stated the Case for the Defendant, and objected that the Plaintiff had not entitled himself by any evidence he had given, to a verdict from the Jury, and that the Court would .be warranted in point of law to nonsuit the Plaintiff, — He insisted that the act of the Defendant in writings the letter was not the publication of a maliciousslan der, but was the act of a person discharging a public duty, and he instanced several cases where one man has charged another with the most serious offences, but being charges brought forward for tits purpose of a necessary inquiry into the conduct of the person ac-4 cured by a competent tribunal, the policy of the law . would not allow an action of slander to be maintain ed thereupon—that in the present case it appeared that the letter written by the Defendant to Lieute nant Colonel McLean was nothing more than an offi cial document, coming from the Defendant, as Com mander of his District, reporting the conduct of an officer under his command, and calling . for an inves tigation of it by the proper jurisdiction-.-that the Defendant would have been deficient in his duty' if he had omitted to make such report, and that from the MISS examination of Captain Lane it appeared that the Defeitdant had very sufficient grounds for doing so—that should it be at all thought necessary, he was prepared to go fully into evidence to prove tl:e justification pleaded by the Defendant, but that `he conceived the Plaintiff had not made out any case, o supporthis action, there being no other ground for it than the official letter of the Defendant'—that the lartourable testimony given by the Plaintiff's own witness, Lieutenant Colonel M.Lean, of the purity of the Defendant's motives, put it beycnt a doubt that the Defendant acted without any malicious iteuntion towards the Plaintiff, and that the present action could not be maintained without the utter subversion of all military discipline. Mr. BURROWES, Counsel for the plaintiff; replied at length to the argument of the Solicitor General, and insisted that the plaintiff ought not to be non stf ted—to which the Lord Chief Justice assented. The Counsel for the defendant were then asked by the Court if they meant to give any evidence—they said that they were prepared with a great number of witnesses to prove every part of the: justification, pleaded by the defendant, but as doing so would only lead to great, and - as alley conceived, unneces. nary length of examination, by which ad adjourn ment of the trial to the foll Owing day, from the num ber of witnesses, would be the 'consequence—they preferred leaving the case to the Court and Jury upon the evidence adduced by the plaintiff.himself. Thb Loan CHIEF JUSI'ICE then addressed the Jury, and after recapitulating the evidence, told them that if a superior officer had received information of the misconduct of any officer under his command, it would be a breach of his duty, and for which he !would be liable to punishment himself, if he had not reported it to the Genaml Officer, to whom it be longed to inquire into such misconduct s that no man• h tying a command in the army could exercise any' authority, if an action of this sort were to lie ; it would• tend to the dissolution of every thing in the military .establishment of the country ; he adverted to the evi dence of Lieutenant Colonel M‘Lean, who said that ] the letter was received by him in the Ordinary course of an official communication ; and that as such, he' transmitted it to General Manly ; and 'the same wits ness, by his knowledge of the general character and, good conduct of the defendant, rebutted any presumpr von of a malicious motive existing in the - mind of the: defendant. His Lordship also remarked on the evi• deuce of Captain Lane, and told. he Jury that if they believed the letter in question was not an official re port, but merely written to injure and defame the , plaintiff, and not with a view to put the matter com plained of in a regular course of military investiga: tion, they eught to find for the plaintiff; but if they believed the letter to be merely an official commdni. cation, then, in pcint of law, defendant had not writ ten a malicious libel, whether the charges in that libel were trot or false, and therefore, if the opinion cf the. Jury was, that the letter was of that description they must find for the defendant on the general issue •" and it was quite immaterial to inquire into the truth, or falsehood of the charges, which was subject to the second plea put in by the defend .nt. The Jury ' retired, and in about twenty minutes brought in a verdict for the defendant, with 6d. costs. The Earl of IdAttniNoioN, the Conini.inder of the forces in Ireland, sat on the Bench- during the whole COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DUBLIN, JULY 14, LIEUTENANT CHARLES WALLIS OF THE DRIVERS CORPS v. LIEUTENANT-COLONEL BROOKE YOUNG, OF THE ROYAL ARTILLERY. • This was an action for a libel, alledged to be eon-. tained in a letter, bearing date the 26th of Novem ber, 1807, written by the defendant to Lieutenant- , Colonel M'Lean, then Brigade Major to General Manly, Commander of the Royal Artillery in Ire land, and said to reflect on the Plaintiff. The de claration consisted of several counts : the plaintiff laid his damages at 50001. and the defendant pleaded : the general issue and a justification. Mr. Serjeant BALL, the plaintiff's leading Counsel, stated, that the plaintiff was a young ger tleman who lately held a commission in the troop of Royal Artil-' lery Drivers, having been appointed a Lieutenant therein in the month of March, 1807, and was or dered to join the corps, then quartered in Cork, under the'defendant, who then commanded the Royal Ar tillery in the south west division of Ireland. The . Learned Counsel, after stating several circumstances to induce a belief that the defendant entertained an unfavourable disposition towards the plaintiff, men tioned, that the plaintiff was, previous to the month of November, 1807, suspended from all military duty by the defendant, and put under a species of arrest by him, and that defen&nt refused to listen to any explapation by plaintiff of his conduct—that the plaintiff was nova afterwards permitted to do any duty in Cork, and that be was ordered in November, 1507, to leave Cork, and to repair to the barracks at Island-bridge near Dublin, by General Manly.— The subject of the present action was a letter written by the defendant, shortly after, to Major M'Lean, then Brigade Major to the General, containing charges of a very serious nature, against the plain tiff,. esiolvim his character as a gentleman, and im puting-toll= several ungentlemanly acts while under the defendant's command in Cork—Colonel *Lean, on receiving this letter as an official document, laid it before General Manly, who ordered it to be submit ted to some of the officers of the Corps of Drivers, at Island-bridge, to which the plaintiff then belonged,' to make a report upon it to him—that such repot was favourable to the plaintiff, and that plaintiff, conceiving-himself much aggrieved by the reprecen tation contained in the defendant's said letter, had brought thesresent action. That since the bringing of the action, a Court Martial was appointed for the investigation of the plaintiff's conduct while in Cork, under the command of the defendant, and that al-, though the plaintiff was; by the sentence of the Court Martial, cashiered, yet that the sentence was qualified in such a manner, as to leave the defendant fully open to the present action. The fii'st witness for the plaintiff was Lieutenant- Colonel M‘Lean. He said that he was in November . I ist, and still is, doing the duty of Brigade-Major to General Manly, who commands the Royal Artillery in Ireland—that having received from the defendant the letter in question, he, of course, put the plaintiff: under an arrest ; that General Manly, from motives of clemency, was induced to desire the officers of the Drivers Corps at Island-bridge to consult together on the charges contained in theletter,. and report their opinion to him ; it was not a court of inquiry, nor was the defendant, or any person on his behalf, pre sent at it, or any witnesses examined on either side. He said, on his cross-ekamination, that it was the duty of a Commanding Officer to report the conduct of those under his command, whenever he thought it necessary, and that he himself was the proper per son to whom the report was to be made fur General Manly. He said that the letter in question contained animadversions on the conduct of another officer, as well as on that of the: plaintiff, and that he, the wit ness, entered the letter in his book as an official docu ment : he knew Lieutenant-Colonel Young for up. wards of twenty-seven years—spoke in the highest terms of respect of him, and said that from his know ledge of him he was convinced that he was incapable of making the performance of his duty subservient to any malicious purpose.. The second *witness was Captain Henry Lane, in the Corps of Royal Artillery Drivers, who appe ared: to be the other officer complained of by tbe Defen dant, in the letter to . Lieutenant-Colonel M'Lean.— Capt. Lane proved, that being in the same regiment with the Plaintiff, and serving in Cork, he saw an order in the orderly-book, in the month of November last, importing that the Plaintiff was suspended frcm ' duty by the Defendant—that shortly after such order the Plaintiff wrote a letter to the Defendant, which ' Defendant returned unopened ; he said that the Plain tiff was ordered from Cork to Island-bridge, and that he was refused certain accommodations by the De-' fen dant, which are usually given to officers who change qUarters. On the creak-examination of this witness, he said that the Defendant had once or twice made a corn. plaint of the Plaintiff to him, and imputed irregula rities to him ' • that he could not say whether the lady that Plaintiff bad at his lodgings in Cork, was his wife OT not. This witness being asked whether Colonel Young kid not occasion to make a report of himself, art- DIVIDENDS. • August 2. Valentine Green and Rupert Green, of Percy-street, Tottenham-Court...road, engravers, printsellers and copartners, at eleven, at Guildhall. August 2. Samuel Abrahams, of Sandwich, Kent, linen-draper, at tea, at Guildhall, London. August 2. John Cramer, of the Royal Spa Gardens, Bermondsey. Surrey, victualler, at one, at Guildhall. August 2. John Mathias, of BrlghthelmstOnt, Sussex, slater, at eleven, at Guildhall, London. Argue 2. George Harrison, of Globe-street, Wapp:ng, carpen; ter and builder, at ten, at Guildhall. August 2. George Potts, of Newcastle-upon--7'yne, at tan, at Guildhall, London. PARTNERSHIPS DISSOLVED. Jonathan Brooks and John Antics of Manchester, merchants, July 21, 1808..-John Craves, John Swaine, Timothy Wood, and Edmund Marsden, St. Margaret's-hill, Southwark, hop and seed merchants, Jane 1, 1007.—Wm. Maroon and John Robert., of Miczle.fael, Cheshire, cotton-manufacturers, July 29,.1808...-- Thomas Wilduck and Jahn Moreton, of Red Lion-court, War linglureet, tea dealers, July es, 1102.—R. Harriern and H. Har- Ilion, of the City Chambers, Bishopegate street, merclrafita and insurance-brokers, July 03, 1.208.--D. Godfrey and H. Edwards, Narrow WalkLantibeth, millwrights July :¢.—John Mark and George Booth, of Bscklersbury , mak factors, July 21.—James Thomber and' Rhbert Brennand, of Settle, Yorkshire, cotton spionters, if .—Stephen and John Shelton, of Bollington, Cheilirsuchtton-spinuers, July 22.--J. Farmer, H. Booth, Wm. Werlaans:.agd T. Peacock, of Houghton near Manchester, hat manyeacmers, April 19.—Harriet Moat and Elizabeth Shep heari'NEWlngfon-Grren, July 25.—G. Ashforth, Sam. Ellis. S. keie J. Actin, and' . Hilton, of Sheffield, silver-smiths, as to T. 141;e11, July 22.—J.- Smith and G. Osborne, of Sheffield, edge. thalaisere, hely 11,1909. itnpl tflentl. :At'fb eonrCHerefordslure„ the Lady of Tboeias hate. hind 14W111, Riy. of „usa. Thursday last, at MarldleSd, Stunford-hiC, the Lady of Robot Mioirsy, Esq. et Coekalroie, Flfeshire, of a son. M sir.bgagyksLanglishe's, Stepliesestraess. Dublin, the Litt sif the Rev. Dean Langrishe, of a daughter. io Merrion-square, Dublin, tile Counteu of Mcati , g MOW. Th u rsday, at his haute in York s the Lady of Ch a i m h er, M. D: of a daughter. le Dublin, on Saturday last. Harivage Gifftrd, Esq. of Fitztvl liaupstreet, to Miss Itiarriet Puma!, scoot'd daurater of Lord p eune n 4 Es+ of linggot4treet. T u esday, as Maidstone, Horatio Pope, Esq. of Fan House. se *Alas Lee, onlY danihter of William Lee, Esq. of the Bower. Monday last. at Great Driefield, Mr. John Kendal!, of e ut place, to Miss itottidsy, youngew daughter of the late jhomas Edo . wards Rousby,foq. of Crown. Dr. James Gordon, of Keith, to Miss Mary Murray Graw, daughter date late laka Grant. Esq. of Gallowle. DIAD. At re 'e4 ate.. John Thorn, Established Dissenting Mi. ulster of the' Cingregatien of that town. A few days ego. at Mq,,ton, in advanced life, Mr. Swi ms Tate. of that paces. His death is supposed to have been e ase d by his having drank a quantity of skimming. whilst in a si de d perspiration from the heat of the weather. At HA oe the 9th init. Widow Pinder ; by her registe it sp. peon that she wit born at Louth. lascolnshire.•th, 7.h hd , 174; se.thetehe had attained the qgassf 103 years. At Whitehouse, on the 47th ult. Mrs. Farquharson. widow d i the late Alexander Farquharson, Esq. of Balfour, in tilt 51si year of her age. Last Thursday. at'Popler, Miss Eliza Sherwood, Aden d o lo. ter of the late (...ptain Sherwood, of the Honourable East 3o s, Company's service. A few days since. the Rev. Robert Eaton, vicar of Bon&ca. Aleph, aged et. At Praetor:kirk, on the 19th instant, the Rev. Daniel Mee. queen, f or ty years Minister:of that parish, esteemed, andsinceret regretted by all who knew WM. Sunday mornipg, at her seat at Groves, sea Staple, Lad, Lynch, relict of Sir Watt. Lynch, Knight of the Bath, aged Ts. Sunday last, in the 19th year of his age, after a long and psia ful ilbeas, Charles, eldest son of Mr. Charles Posit, of Cantatas); Sunday annight, of apoplexy, ;ged 44$ years, Mr. lossage h , grave, printer, of Chichester. l - IiGH wATEK A 1 LONDON 13IIIDUE TO•MORROIE, Morning - 47 minutes after S Afternoon - • Is minutes after 6 MESSRS. LEIGH and Co. Surgeons, confine th e • attention to the treatment of certain Complaints, concreted in an unguarded hour, and that Debility wl.ichis caused by youth ful habits. Mr. LEIGH having been engaged in this eada Ave branch for the last eleven years its this house, it is presumed dig the advantage of such experience gives the utmost success coitus assiduity with which they devote themselves to the Cure of these Cuinplaints.—ln all cases of recent occurrence the cure is speed, and pain and danger are equally avoided. In every complicated case, and in those distressing deficiencies, which are the conse quences of youthful imprudence, or the enervating indulgences et maturity in warm climattx, their mule of trnatment ensures a safe and permanent restoration to vigorous health. The tense ass stated on the lirat interview, or in answer to letters, containing a - bark not; and in every case the must inviolable secrecy is oh sery ed.—Nu. 29, Arundcl-strut, near Temple Bar. There Is an additional entrance in Water-street adjoining. FQR COUGHS, COLDS, AsTHN4 AS, AND CONSUMPTIONS, ROBBER " D's PALSAMIC ELIXIR ; or Cough Drops. Theic juitly celebrated Drops,.by their happy and immediate deed in removing the molt obelnateCoughs oe Ca. taut; 3, au,t all tem!eney to Conftimption, render them a valuably Fa•oliv !Medicine. And when we confider the variablenefa J our Climate, which coolly:Ay induces vs to catch cold, and that from this midis cold originates a.n..nitirude of difeafes, as Althea', iii the Chra, Offetifive Breath, lalasnmation of the Lunge, and Confamption, with a long train weevils—no bead of a h. mill Riould lie down without a (mall fupply at kelt, of :his molt. Mftantanenus remedy. Many tbottfand perking can /citify the hap MIAs they bavc received from it., when every Ogles Medical affiltance had failed. A CAU I'ION • —Obrerve the same uf IL Botha', No 4, Chnlo fide. is engraved or a black Remy, Width is Affixed to each boulq all others are couttrfeits. Sold at Mr. Bu:ler's. Ne. j,t3huipliae, corner of Patemo.fter.. row ; and retail by Crifp. Corner of Spine Gardens; Clark, 269, Borough: Mi. Baster, Fdinbargli and Olifeow : and may be had of moft Coattail , Mead:ascenders. in bottles at as 94 and fis exch. - ' DR. FREEMAN'S CUTTA SALUTARIS. -- PHE value of this Infallible Medicine hasbeen so long proved, that nothing of thelartaent day can bear a corn petition w.th it in an the dilferent-stages of a eertainDiscase,whiels . it effectually curt s and rradicaus from the habit, without exciting the painful feelings and exposure that attends salivation, without debilitating the constitution in' any degree, or even re-Wring con finetnent from hasinea, of restriction in diet. Theradisai vie tees of these inestimahleDrepshave proved their claim to pdbl. appr9batio:l for more than thirty years: In all the debility aback idles, they prove a never failing renorative ,wherher the aebilits' . s produced by too free use of holercory, illicit pleasures, or. the effects of a warm climate to travellers, and those going -*breath They cannot be recren trended too strongly to those who Will re• celve a lie, speedy, and complete cure in all oldatubborn Glut% and every weakne,s that :.fleets the bladder and organs of =in-_ B y its efficacy many 'women have become mothers, who for feats' had been deprived of that hap?iness. . . Sold wholesale and road ; r. Itut lee:, Na a, Cheapside, emu !ler of Paternoster-rou , and ret..ij, by Belam, Portsmouth; Wes nn, Portsea ; Wills and Flours, Plymouth; Peak, Hull : Col well, Dublin ; Baxter and Macdonald, Glaagow; `Baxter, Sesidi and Manderton, Edinburgh, and by most country medicine Tani: dens, in bottles at 2s.'d. each, with ampl4.4ire'ctiont. li\!l'UK7 AN I' Public must always derne - 3 - from regularly educated professional men directing almltt exclusively their !-tu.Jies to one species of malady, was never more clearly detnonstr.:tea than by the unexampled 3UCCCSI which attended the &don:infra; iOll (Atha:. new remedy, and the extract dinary tures it Las pertormesl. ror a long series.of ye:km.l\l.l3m Cultasz :.nd Co. Ssrgeons, formerly in his Majesty's service, have made the Venereal Disease the particular object of their inv .t..- .gation, and see happy ire having discovered s meditinesuperior eV merry ks the cure of that complaint ; it is sisificicnt to'obst-rw that the effects of tkis remedy are diametrically opposite to tall.. of nrrcury, for fhongh it completely eradicates every a estigu thelvircs, in ire most confirmil stases, fet it does hot in the hate . injure the constitution; on the contrary, it enovates the syst.i. in all its natural instaions, promotes appetite, sindfacilitates gestion : akar instead of reducing a • rong sand vigarotse cionstitt• thin to theTriglltful cit;ldltion that mercury does, it not only p: serves tint emtnitetion jp its primitive state, but restores a ryes and debilitated oteetielte natural strentth and vigour. Ntimb.r less instanco are on recent record of the superior elficaorof medicine, its inherent and specific rheum acting as a papett.r. corrective to bodily debilityy , whetherproceedizw from an mr• of conjngal or Mkt plelstire, or.from the more insidious, ihnr.,:ls [ not lesedeuructive, indulgence of incatitioos youth ci both sirs-r in a certain perairions habit. Amidst the melancholy variety disorders which are the conseqoerce ofthis solitary vioe, there as none more afflictins than that distressing state ot debility and ficlency *Wit prevents or embitters she matrinaccial stye ; !St unbappyieWereribriso& ever his mlatbrtune, ashamed to soeltr - .. lief, until he is reduced to such a state of weakness as to renite life oppressiv e . such persons It Atust be a iownsormg saffee tifin to know, that they may, now, by a new infallible anode 4 treat/milt, be rektnred to that greatest of all hunrau kleasing, sk strong, manly andvigrrous constitution. - • In air .in of debility. daSeieney, foam whatevar cause Welty, as, well as in every species of venereal infeWere,, Messrs- Currie and Co. may be consulted by patients of either sum with greatest secrecy, arid honour, at their hnoie u . N 0.107, Ifett.zri airden. Patients 'in the'enantry, describing the partirulav their complaints, by letter post paid, entice/mg a Sint note, 'a have the necessary medicine and advice was to easy part of , ±le kingdom. No. 107, Hatton. Garden. _ LONDON : Printed and Publicized by LEVEL SEMI, of Can terbury Pther, Lambeth. at the STaa.Orrsqs. No. 1", Casey street. Publicized alio at the STAR-Osticii, Tisnlde Sae.