Star. — London, England, 1822-11-16 00:00:00

FAIR EMI4IA. BY S. BIOCKETT. The gStering tears which trembling Fair rummies magic eyes, Like pearly drops of dew distil rd By blushing morning skies; As vernal show'rs on roses spread, Revive their drooping leaves, So woman's tears, by beauty shed, A balmy solace gives! Heav'n protect my Henry's life, Fair Emma gently sigh'd, 0! shield him in the battle's strife, Where flows the purple tide ; But should ha fall like some gay !lover, - Untimely snapt by fate, Alt me ! my heart, that heavy hour, With keen distress would break ! Wheie valets their soft hues display, And simple flow'rets bloom, Fair Emma oft would wand'ring stray, Amid the sunless gloom; Hope then would whisper to her breast, And check the rising tear, Hush ev'ry vagrant fear to rest, And banish dark Despair! The battle won, the conflict past, The Hero sought his home, Where blest in Ernma's arms at last, No more shall Henry roam ; Thus many a black and frowning night, Portentous and unkind, Precedes a cloudless morning bright, A lesson for the mind! COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 15 At the full sitting of the Court, the Judges en tered on the consideration of cases in the special paper, NIGHT OF PARTIES ACCUSED OF CRIME TO PRO FESSIONAL ASSISTANCE ON EXAMINATION BEFORE MAGISTRATES. COX V. COLERIDGE AND ANOTHER. Mr. COLERIDGE rose to. argue this case on behalf of the defendants. The declaration contained two counts : the first stating that the plaintiff entered a common inn, whence he was forcibly expelled by the defendants ; and the second, charging a common as sault. To this there were two pleas: the first setting forth that the defendants were two Magistrates of the County of Devon, and were lawfully assembled in the public-house alluded to, for the examination of the prosecutor and witnesses against a man called Geroge Brown, charged with felony ; that the plain tiff intruded himself into the roans, which he was ci villy requested to leave, and that he refused to leave it, on which necessary force was employed to expel him : the second plea, alleging that he so improperly conducted himself in the public-house as to render his expulsion requi , ite. To the first of these pleas the plaintiff replied, that he was an attorney of the Court of King's Bench, and well skilled in the laws and customs of the realm ; that George Brown had been previously examined, and had alleged that there were witnesses who could prove his innocence; that Brown was set at liberty, to give him an opportunity to pro cure them ; that this second examination was ap pointed further to investigate the charge ; that Brown retaned the plaintiff to assist him in his defence ; that the plaintiff accordingly entered the room for the purpose, and made known his professional character and retainer, but was forcibly expelled Li the maimer stated in the declaration . . To this replication the de fendants demurred, and thus the validity of the re plication was submitted to the judgment of the Court. On these pleadings two questions arose : first, whe ther a person in the situation of Brown had a right to insist on being permitted t , 4 introduce an attorney on his behalf; and second, whether, admitting such right, these was a privity between the client and at torney, sufficient to entitle the latter to insist on the right as his own. The first of those questions was the most important, and on this only did he (Mr. Cole ridge) propose to occupy the time of the Court.— There were two modern decisions which is would be proper to mention, though not exactly in point— " The King v. the Justices of Staffordshire," 1 Chitty's Repot ts, 218 ; and " The King v. Borron," 3 Dame wall and Alderson, it 39. In the first of these, where a piny was charged with an offence against the Game Laws, an attorney appeared for him, and was ordered to retire by t h e-Magistrates; and the Court refused to grant a criminal information against them. In the second, the Court also rejected a similar ap plication against Magistrates who had refused to per mit an attorney to be present and comment on the evidence to be given on a charge of felony. These were, indeed, cases of criminal information, where the legal right was not strictly in issue, but still the opinion of the Court was evidently that the attorney in each instance had no right to intei tele. But if all cases were put out of the question, and the point were regarded with reference to principle alone, it would be clearly found that neither the situation in which the prisoner stood, nor the duty which the Magistrates had to perform, admitted of the doctrine that he had a tight to demand of them liberty for his attorney to assist him. He was not on trial, but examination, and they were bound to commit him, not only if they were perfectly satisfied of his guilt, but unless they were assured that the accusation was groundless. The ancient authorities, indeed, carried this doctrine farther, fir it was laid down by Dalton, in his Justice, c. 1G 1, p. 107, that even if Magistrates believed the party to be innocent, it was the safer course for them not to discharge, but to commit or bail him. Mr. Justice BAYLEY.—That is hardly lax► now, Mr. Coleridge. Is not that an authority which proves too much ? Mr. COLERIDGE replied, that his argument did not require that this doctrine should be sustained to its full extent. In another passage the same writer re commended Magistrates to receive the testimony eien of infamous and incompetent witnesses, and to submit their evidence to the Judges of Assize, rather than to take on themselves altogether to refuie hi-- Lord Hale, whose zeal for the liberty of the subject often exposed him to the censure of the party in power, laid down that Justices ought not to discharge a prisoner accused of felony, unless it should appear either that no felony had been committed, or that the charge did not amount to felony in law. And Mr. Serjeant Hawkins, in his Pleas of the Crown, b. 2. e. 15. s.l. directed Magistrates not to discharge unless they should be satisfied that the accusation was totally unfounded. The Statite 1 and 2 Philip and .Slary enacted, that Justices should " take the exa- . titillation o f t he p r isoner, aid the information of those who bring him,' and certify the result to the Judges of Assize—expressions not certainly conveying any idea that the prisoner should have •the aid of an ad vocate. At the period when that Act was passed . , could an Attorney have claimed admission as a right? Then there was no process to summon witnesses for the prisoner ; then those witnesses could not he exa mined on oath, if at all; then their testimony,X taken, could never have been certified at the Assizes. If an Attorney had no right then, by 'what Statute, by what authority had he acquired id sinew? There was no Statute giving theright or recogskibing it, although the attention of the Legislature was called to the sub ject on several occasions ; as, when it was enacted that witnesses should be sworn on behalf of the pri soner, and when provision was made for the exami nation of witnesses in Scotland. In all the commend caries upon these Statutes there was no word on the subject of this right. What was the analogy of the law in other cases? Before a Grand Jurty the pri soner was allowed neither witnesses, nor Attorney, nor Counsel : and why should he be allowed an At torney before the Magistrates ? If the prisoner might insist on employing an Attorney, the prosecutor might demand the same privilege, and the result would not on the whole be favourable to the accused, while it would tend to great inconvenience. In many cases, a private examination was necessary ; where, for ex ample, the detection of a gang of offenders was ex pected, and where the presence of a person claiming to act as Attorney for one of them in custody would . be the means of conveying information which might ensure impunity to the rest. So treason, the highest of offences, might be shielded from discovery . by a measure so easily taken. if sometimes a party, who might otherwise be discharged, was remanded from the want of professional assistance, this Was only one of those inconveniences to which all men in society must consent to be liable; and this evil, of rare oc currence, would be more than balanced by the pre judice which would arise to the prisoner himself by raising a preliminary examination to a species of trial, the decision of • which might seem almost decisive against him. Some consideration, also, was due to the feelings of Magistrates, who might be harassed with petty actions through the interference of Attar nies watching their proceedings with a captious eye; and thus a class of men would be harassed to whose unbought services the country was deeply indebted. When it was considered bow intricate the criminal law was now become, the Curt would not expose those who were honestly desirous of fulfilling their duties to the criticism of any practitioners who might desire to observe them; nor thus drive the gentry of the land from an office which it was so desirable that they should continue to fill. Mr. CONINION SERJEANT, for the plaintiff, said that he trusted he should be able to convince the Court that every man who had the misfortune to be ac cused, had, by the law of ,England, a right to the as sistance of some skilful person to advise and assist him. As to the old law cited by his Learned Friend, he should feel ashamed if he could condescend to an swer it ; he trusted that the mere statement of the monstrous propositions of Dalton ',rad consigned them to rerrObation for ever, and that they never would be cited more. To the two later cases quoted, he was ine.ated to pay all due respect ; but these were cases of criminal information, where it was not ne cessary to the point of law, because the Court would never visit Magistrates with punishment for mete il legal conduct, if they had acted with no corrupt or malignant design. When it was considered what tre mendous powers were now intrusted to Magistrates' —how much of misery might be inflicted even by a single Magistrate, on the oath of a single witness— that there were cases in which penalties of 1001. might be adjudged by Magistrates—others in which persofis liable to imprisonment might be sent.to serve in the navy for five years—and cases under the Exci,e laws in which penalties to the amount of thousands might be intlicted—he trusted the Court would pause betore they decided that a man, oppressed in his feel inp,'s by his situation, should have none to advise or assist him ! If a distinction between Attornies and Counsel was to be set up, it must be answered that, in distant parts of the country, Counsel were not to be obtained, and the prisoner must receive the aid of . anon:les or be entirely bereft of assistance. lie had a right, surely, in common justice, to an effectual cross-examination of the witnesses against him, to sift their story, and, out of their own mouths, to prove its falsehood. To the assertion that, before the statute of Anne, the witnesses for the prisoner could not be examined on oath, he would oppose the high autho rity of Lord Coke, who spoke of the doctiine with the indignation which it merited, and denied that it ever was the law of England. There was no such thing as secret examination in the sense contended for ; witnesses might he questioned apart for the pur poses of detection, but. the judicial examination must, by the very statute of Philip and Mary, be taken in the presence of the prisoner. When the Court recol lected that the e....minations so taken might, in case of death, be read in evidence against the accused on his trial—when they called to mind the distress and ruin to which be might be subjected by a mistaken commitment, when he ought to have received his discharge—when they considered how important it was to his dearest interests that he should have a real and effectual cross-examination of the witnesses ; they would, he trusted, determine that, in a season when his own energies might well be paralyzed, he should be entitled to that assistance which, in the open Courts of Justice, he might so . openly employ. The LORD CHIEF. Josrrez said, that if he enter tained any apprehensions that the opinion he had formed on this question could produce inconvenience in the administration of. justice, and especially if it could affect the liberty of the subject, which was the most important end of such administration, he should pause before he expressed it. But, convinced that on an enlarged view of the question it would appear that no such inconvenience could arise, and that the tights of the subject would be best guarded by his decision, he should proceed at once to givojudg ment. In order to sustain his replication, the plain tiff must be prepared to contend, that every man ac cused of crime had the right to employ any person skilful in the law, whether an 'attorney or not an at-. torney, to assist him in his defence ; for it was no part of the duty of an attorney, as such, to attend with his client : he was properly a person put in the stead of another to act for hi*, not an assistant to act with him. For such a position , there iris "no. fainslation b canter/ OW abittarevtisangh M gistrates . had, in the extcsisaii their discretion, often pt.,mitted Counsel smdAttoruinsaerettend on tsehtdfl of the party accused, and would anus doubt do so, w he r ever such asststancir viat fitting and requisite. If the right were granted to the prisoner, it must also be conceded to the proweutor, who would in all pro bability be more frequently in situation to avail himself of it; and if allowed before Magiurates, it might even with greiter reason be insisted on before 'the Grand Jury. - Satisfied, therefore, dial no real in-', jury could arise to the subject from denying the claim of right, and - that there was no authority to support it, he must pronounce thit the replication was bad, and that tfie defendant's - were emitted to judgment. Mr. Justice tiirimr concurred in the opinion of the Lord Chief Justice. He did not, however, at . all ground his decision on the language of Dalton, which he held not to be law ; as, beyond all doubt,' if a Magistrate were convinced of the• innocence of a prisoner, it was his duty to discharge him. On era- . minations the Magistrate we% the only adviser of the accused recognized by • laws to him any questivas might be suggested, and he would not fail to put them; and the Court would not presume him either ignorant of his duty or unwilling to perform it. Mr. Justice Houton) was of the same opinion. , Mr. Justice Bear said, this was not a question to be decided by argument, for the convenience or in convenience of the practice, but by the law as it stood: He concurred in opinion with his Lea(ned Brothers, that there was no authority for the practice. What bad been cited from Coke was, be thiabght, overborne by every other authority, and it was moreover con tradicted by the statutes which had been referred to. lie did not agree with what had' been cited from Dalton's Justice : he thought the law was, that the Magistrate might discharge, the party accused, if he saw the charge was groundless; but it was fit that passage in Dalton should be considered by those sshe thought the Constitution of the country got more un favourable to the liberty of the subject, as he had no doubt that was the law in the time of Dalton, and the present practice was of modern growth. Judgment for the. defendants. COURT OF COMMO_V PLEAS, NOT% 15. D. CLOVES, JUN. V. BIGDEN. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN stated that this was an action to recover the sum of thirty pounds, for the use and occupation of certain lands at Kirton, in Lincolnshire. The plaintiff's case was, that the Rev. Charles Wildbore had transferred • k to him (plaintiff*, acting as a trustee for his father, who was the holder of an annuity due from Wildbore) certain lands in the occupation of the defendant as security for the payment of that annuity—that the defendant had notice of the transfer, and had acquiesced in the change of landlords, and was therefore now bound to pay to the The deeds of conveyance of Mr. Wildbore's interest were regularly proved. Mr. Serjeant PELL, for the defendant, submitted first to the Court, that in point of law there was no evidence of an implied contract. Mr. Justice PARK held th ' there was evidence to go to the Jury. Mr. i;erjeant PELL then addressed the Jury on the merits of the case. The Rev. Charles Wildbore was the holder of those lands, which were charity lands, in trust for the support of a school, of which he was the principal, and assigned his interest as security for the payment of an annuity, instead of applying them to their original purpose. He would only say upon the subject of such an application of charity lands, that he hoped it would soon become matter of im portant consideration in another place ; but leaving that, he ctuitended that there was no evidence to chew that the titlencla it had ever consented to the transfer, or to payment of rent to the plaintiff. Mr. Justice I'ARK summed up, and the Jury found for. the plaintiff—Damages £3O, for two years' rent. Thursday evening, about dusk, as a young man, named Thomas Bickerstaff, was coming along the Vauxhall•rnad, towards the bridge, he saw a gigantic fellow dressed in the garb of a beggar,"with a wallet before and another behind him, going in the same direction. They walked on to the end of the new street, where Mr. B. had octasion to call at a friend's house; but, on returning again, he saw the same fellow sitting upon a stone. He bade him good night, and was proceeding on, when the fellow begged a few halfpence to enable him to get lodgings for the night, saying be came that day from Birmingham, in hopes of procuring work in London. Mr. B. observed, he .could more readily get work in the country, and offered him 4d. The beggar looked at him full in the face, and, in a menacing tone, said he must have more money. This demand he uttered with an oath ; but Mr. B. said he had no more, and was proceeding on, when the fellow in an instant felled him to the ground with a bludgeon which Mr. B. had not pre yios.dy observcl, and declared he would instantly cleave his head in two if he made the least noise. The robber took from him four half;crowns, three single shillings, a knife, a silver watch, his handkerchief, and hat, with which he ran off. • A long investigation took place on Thursday at Bow-steeet,re respecilng a robbery committed on Wednesday evening, at the house of Mr. Manic, a Gentleman residing in Dover-street, Plc cadilly.—Mr. Maule's butler laid the cloth for dinner in the dining-room adjoining the hall, a little before six o'clock on Wed nesday evening, and in a short time afttr The table was found to have been completely stripped of the plate; and a clock which stood on a bracket in the hall was also gone. Information was dispatched to this Office, and Bishop and Herring, two officers, were sent to the house. They questioned the servants separately, and the story related by the butler was this :—Be laid the cloth at the usiral time, and went down to the kitchen, where he sat reading until his mistress's bell rang, and going up to answer it, be saw the ball door standing ajar. He immediately thought of his plate, and hastening to the dining-roomjound the salt turned out upon the cloth; and the stands and every other bit of the plater gone. He instantly told his mistress of the robbery. While he was reading in the kitchen, he said the footman let in an ac quaintance of his, who remained for some time below. The foot man, when questioned, declared he did not leave the ball doer open ; and' when asked if the butler had any visitors, he said there were two men with him in his pantry for a considerable time, two or three days before. They professed to come after the place which the butler was about to leave. The officers found a chair underneath the bracket where the clock had stood, and aid& could net be reached without something to mount upon, and on the chair was one foot-mark of white saud, of the smile kind as the kitchen floor was strewed with, without any mixture of dirt. The streets were very dirty that evening: Bi shop searched the' boxes Of the servants, and in one belonging to the butler hi fantod ties snicks of piste, the property of h4r. Maule. Both Oben were decidedly of oribion that smut per-, COAL-MARKET, NOVEM.BER 15. Burdon 40s 6d —Coslodge 43s—Percy East 39s 6d—Tat. field Mnor 50s—UtWorth 39s' 6d—Wallsend, Bell and Co.'s 44s—Wallsend Brown's 41$ 9d t0 . 42s 6d—WalLsend Jeamn .d Culm 34s—E1gin Main 423—Hartley 33s 3d—Beanthh Moor 37s 6d-.F.den Main 43s—Iledworth Main 40s—Lan:". ton Main 39s 6cr—Nesham 31ain 43s—geahant 39s—Wa1:wa1 Lambton 46s 6d. _ eon 4 * the Ulla ( Vie eteeleS,te ale telkas s lied theY therefore Ira rinnonedtbe invanti before thf Iliaritti Itednetday, and they underwent a loos erailittpetolll4 setilllfenrilliti in their bring tkihvd to ittintiagain on a fottlettdery; tbe Magistrates beingot opinion that, there were circumearwes of suspicion, altheingh there wis not tb warrant : 4'or Meriden: Dl At rligoial, hi illiterem bidi a! slneerely and MR: Esq. Deputy Alit Cosoolsesey- General the itith yenta 'agt. Tuesday, at Mew In Us 82d year, tbs. ltight Hon. Waits Lord Colonel of the First Roy a l ey Regiment of Wilda, ate. His Lordship i s itseceeded la his titlei and estates by Fletcher• Norton, I:+q. the eldest son of the lite Hon. Fletcher Norton, Senior I:dro n o f atII Majesty's Court of heliequer In' &ottan D. an the 7th ittstaht, lk of .1. E. Daniel, I to the Faeces, ill .-- NR%VGATRAsiD LEA niiNnA LL MARK ETS, cud. (By the Carcase.) Beef ... ls 841 to 2s - Sd 1 Val Sr Od to 4s 11 llutton.. ...... Is Sd to' Ss - 4d I Potit • is Sd to Zs 41 Lamb oar Od to os od . PRICES*? HAY A3D STRAW YESTERDAY. sT. airinsb's. wittstcnArvc. Hay, 31 Os 64 to 41 41 Od Hay— 31 es to 41 Os el Straw 11 Ts 6d to 21 Os 6d I Straw 11 es to 11 lts Clover 31 es Od. to 41 4s Od Clover 51 104 to 41 10.. PRICE HOP& WIW SACS. Pm rockets. Kent Sussex 2l Of to 21 10s I Sussex 4I Os to '.:l lla Essex Foreign PRICE OF LEATHER Butts, 50 to 551bs each ................« 29d to 24d per ti Ditto, 56 to 661bs each ....... ............. 24d to 26d Dressing Hides 184 to 19i Fine Coach 'Hides 194 to (11, Crop Hides, 55 to 401bs for cutting iflf f to 20i Ditto 45 to SOlbs OOl to 224 Calf Skins, 30 to 401bs 22d to 264 Ditto 50 to 701bs 0 6d to 32d Ditto 70 to 801b5... . . .. 0 34 to 274 Small Seals (Greenland) 18d to 20d Large ditto 18d to 19d Tanned Horse Hides ... l7d to tBd Spanish Horse Hides . . V ft4IV4 111 DES. • 1 Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary... Qs Sd tq 2s 10d stone) 3s 4d to 35 6d 31arket Calf 1001 Ocl 'to os nd Middlings 34 Od to 3s 2.1 Eng. Horse Od id tU Os 0(1 PRICE or TA LLOW, SOAP, &c. per 112/6. Town Tallow... 46s 6d Ditto rough ... ..... ..... .. .?7a Yellow 11.11*Sia ... 471 041 Yellow Soap "ss White ditto Soap ditto Melting Stuff... ... 3.51 Od Palni * 14 _._ . PR ICE OF CANDLES—From Tallow Chandlers' Hall. Candles, per doz. 9s Od—Moulds, 103 6d; 6d. per dozen allowed for ready money. --- --- - - 28t Ships at Market; 21*Shipa sold; 7 Unsold. COUNTRY MARKETS. OXFORD, Nov. 9.—Wheat 4s. VI a bushel. The price cf a half-peck loaf (household) is. id. • BANBURY, Nov. 14.—Wheat, 2s. 61. to ss. 6d—Dens !)f. to 3s Bd.—Vetches, Os ()d per bushel.—Barley, IR.) to Oats, I6s Od to 28s Od per quarter—Bread, Is Od half pre: ; and smaller in proportion. .Flour Ws. to 445. per sack. Uxsamas, Nov.l4.—New Wheat per load £lO Os to £l Wheat, £7 lOs to £l7—Barley, per quarter, 25s to 31s. —O. t., 18s to Ms—Beans, 27s to 32s.—Peas, 28s to 335. NaWSURY, Balms, Nov. 14.—Wheat, 26s to 4135-- P art , 21s to 32s—Oats, 15s to 28s.—Beans, 25 to to 50s.—Rye, Os to Os.—Bread, 100 to is Oid per Gallon. COURSE OF Amiterdam l2 4 C.F. Ditto at sight l2 1 Rotterdam... l2 5 2U. Antwerp, e*mo. 12 5 Hambiirgh... ..... 37 9 2U. Altona 37 10 IU. Paris, 3day's sight 25 55 . U. Ditto 25 85 2U. Madrid, effective 37 Cadiz effect..: 36} Barcelona ...... 36 . Bilboa, effective 364 3YCHANGB. Seville 36 Gibraltar 3(4 Leghorn ...... 471 Genoa ..... 431 Venice Ital. Liv 27 50 Malta ..... 45 Naples Palermo llB per oz. Lisbon 521 Rio Janeiro 46 Dublin 9l Cork ....... 91 PRICES OF GOL . Foreign Gold in Bars New Doubloons New Dollars Silver, In bars, standard , I) AND SILVER. 3 17 It ...... 0 0 0 ...-.... ........... . 11 4 9} ...- ... o 4 11 i - - Carpe diem— Be prontptly wise. WHERScience began to explore the complicated machinery of Man, she was speedily entangled in a byrinth of mysterious confusion, from which intellectual IN. ric• verance alone emancipated her. Ignorance and empirici.T, however, still oppose their venomous hostility, and the prejudice of weak minds, in some measure, encourages their audacity. As Truth is to Falsehood—so may our public statements be cent pared with their unqualified pretensions, and to expose the:: Ll facies, we have not hesitated to avow ourselves as practitiertrs in a class of Diseases which endanger the mystic evolneons of Nature. To be brief : we are Members of the London Col lege of Surgeons, can establish the integrity of our Character upon the success of Twenty Years' practical experience, and .x- Inounce the grateful testimony of those in whom lung suif , .:*:::g had nearly extinguished every hope of relief. We pledge ourselves to the removal of Syphilis, from it incipient symptoms to the remotest stages, characterized by every doubt and whatever malignancy. The intricate ari much neglected diseases of the Urethra have been carefelly and studiously considered, as have also those delicate and import-7r sympathies which refer to the Female Sex. The infirmities et virility have been especially noticed, whether as arising from Ole debilitating tyranny of a tropical atmosphere—the natural bi..s of constitution—the imprudence of gaiety—or the more alarmi..; results of a propensity to practices " which shun the light ; ' ti.e progress of which is marked by a gradual dereliction of the teal powers. To all, who are thus circumstanced, and mare especially to such as are aspirants for connubial pleasures, we earnestly recommend our Commentary ( The tEgis of I.E4y, the perusal of which must prove beneficial to their moral heppi - ;e 4 The Book may be bad at 10, Paternoster-row ; 59, Pall-Van; 41, Piccadilly ; 16,. Prince's-street, Soho ; 174, and 32, Flert street; 40, West Smithfield ; 48;-Citeapside; liurks and !it'" venson, Norwich; Deck, Ipswich; Sheppard, Bristol; Bat r-t 7 and Duffield, Bath; Ilatt, Cambridge; Headley, Leeds; :1-1 by all Bookaelleili. Remedies can be forwarded to any part of the count try ; bents writieg for the same, will please to enclose a .1 1 ... k Soc . Attendance at home for conultation as usuaL GOSS and CO. M.R.C. Surgeons, No. 7, Sermyn-s.reet, ph imudes; and No.ll, Bouvetie-atreet, Fleet-street, Loodui• -1 private door round the corner. MAILS. Asa. i. Dublin 1 0 Waterford 1 0 Guernsey and Jersey 0 0 Lisbon 0 0 Holland 0 0 Mediterranean 0 0 ass. ans. France 0 1 Hamburg"' . 0 0 Flanders . 0 - 0 . Malta 0 0 Gottenhurgh 0 1 Brasil 0 0 4J ATUR it LON OC)14 BRIDGIC TO-IllOMMti"• • . 38 minutes I* 3 Afternoon - 14 minUtil Sher 4 . - LQAI1)U;1: l'cinted ♦nd pit!lliNhett by Lay's. riatett. I:taipk-Day. . N I ' k c . . ,1