Star. — London, England, 1817-03-24 00:00:00

;leek, vicar of the said parish of Harrold ; and that In the month of July last she was in the garden of her father's house, between the hours of nine and ten at night, and was laid hold of by a man, whom she discovered to he James Harris, of the said parish, Sadler; th it she threttened to tell Ater father of his • behaviour, and upon his promising not to commit the like offence again, she did not inform her father.— Further this deponent with, that on the evening of the 18th of Oziohcr last, between six and seven o'clock in the evening, having occasion to go i. tithe garden, as she was retuning, the said J. Harris, hay. tag, as she siippues, watched her moti.ins, soddenly assaulted her, put his Icot behind her legs, and threw her down viol ntiy, by which fall she was stunned, and that during the time she thus lay senseless on the ground, he by force and violence, and against her will, effected his purpose ; that when she came ti) her self, she screamed out, and called for her sister; and that the said J. Hauls, in her calling out, held :lb knife to her throa', and threatened to kill her. That awn after her sister came to 11 , 2, and by her means }Janis was pulled away, and Went out cf the garden. That in consequence of this act of violence she is likely to become a mother, and through shame, never discovered, even to her father, the ill treatment she had met until by her increased size it could be no longer concealed." The deposition of Sarah Woodward was the same as detailed in Mr. Serjeant IlLossm's speech. The examination of the Rev. Mr. Hooper, by Mr. Sioux, was then continued. In consequence of this information, he issued his warrant for the apprehen sion of liarris—Harris was brought belore hint the same day, and he committed him to prison. H. sent .for a neighbour, a Mr. Eyles, to be present at the examination. The verdict of acquittal of Mr. J. Harris was ad mitted by Mr. Horn. J. Harris examined. I live at Harrold, and am 22 years of age. I am a sadler by trade. I know the three defendants perfectly well. I never had cri minal intercourse with Susannah Woodward in my life. I went to school to her Hither for about a year. lowa' then between 13 and 14 years of age. I had no acquaintance with Mr. Woodward, except going to school to him. 1 had no acquaintance whatever with his daughters. I. did not assault Miss Susannah on the night mentioned is July, nor on any subse quent night. I spent the whole of the evening of Oc tober 18, with a Mrs. Reynolds and a Mr. N 'rthern. Elizabeth Glentun was the next witness. She ap. peared much indisposed ; and on being asked sonic questions, said, " she had already said the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and could say no more. Her head was very bad, "and she could not recollect what she had said." To la frequent repeti tion of questions she gave the same reply. At length, with sonic difficulty, she was induced to say, in an. suer to a question from Mr. Serjeant BLosseTT, that " Mr.Wuodward came to her, and wanted her to say that she heard her apprentice say, that he was with • young Harris when he was with Woodward's daugh ter. She, however, never heard her apprentice say any such thing." Here the witness faictej, and was tarried out of Court. Mr. iiurcr remarked, that it was very unfortunate for his client that he bad not been able to cross. examine this witness. Serjeaot 131.oesarr was about to call further evidence, but the Learned Judge conceited he bad already submitted sufficient to support his case. Mr. Serjeant BLosscrr said, he was prepared with witnesses who would protect a clear alibi on the part to bis client. Mr. Hiner addressed the Coact and Jury on the part of the defendants. Mr. Baron GRAHAM now proceeded to sum up the case to the Jury. His Lordship observed, that the defendants, the Rev. Robert Woodward and his two unfortunate daughters, Susannah and Sarah, stood indicted, and the indictment charged, that on the 7th of June, 1815, the said Robert Woodward and these too young women did conspire and agree falsely to accuse one James Harris of having, on the 18th of October, in preceding year, by force and violence, violated the said Susannah Woodward; that the said Sasannah did, in the month of June, 1815, falsely charge the said James Harris with the said offence, and that in the Spring Assizes following he was tried and acquitted thereof. This was the short substance of the indictment; and that which the Jury had to decide was, whether the three defendants, two, or any of them, had been guilty of the offence imputed to them ? In order to commit the crime of coo 'piracy, two must necessarily have been concerned ; therefore, in thircase, the Jury must either find two guilty, or acquit the defendants altogether. With these prefatory remarks, lie should proceed to detail the etfldence, which he would do with the more particu larity from the aeriousntss of the charge, and the rank in society of the individuals who stood before him.— The Learned Judge then read over the whole of the evidence; he observed, it was clear that the father imust have known his daughter was in a state of reg . mane/. He would, however, duke a few observa tions in order to see Low far he .inclusion was fair,l that no violation had been committed, and that all the defendants had been parties to the conspiracy un• der which Coe prosecutor was accused of that offense. 4 ' Gentlemen of the Jury," continued his Lordship, 6 4 you will see how the matter stands, and whether yoe can conscientiously believe there was one tittle of truth at the bottom of this charge. In the first place it appears. that not a. syllable of tl.is charge came to the knowledge of James Harris till seven or ht months after the fact was alled_ged to have taken pace ; and then what was done I The charge is pre. !erred. the prosecutriz is examined, and upon coning into a Court of Justice finds no credit. Now it is said, not with the strictest and most perfect correct oess, that the prisoner was acquitted upon a point of law, and not upon the merits of the case. This, I am satisfied,- is not true; the fact is, that the itnJ probability of the charge was the true ground upon "bids tbeacquittal.took place; and certainly nothing as h, *sae more the face of improbability, than that , If the Clime alledged had been committed it would' h a ve been kept secret from the month of October to ate June following s but it becomes still more impro bable, whets the situation of the parties is considered; the one a young woman of education an 4 modesty, sad the other a young man living in the same parish. Can any one believe chit the daughter of a clergy. plan cou ld have bees so ignorant of the state of so- 'ciety, as not to know that she would have been suf. ficieutly protected from the violence with which she said she was threatened 1 or that she would, after having been so atrociously abused, under any feelings of terror, have lost a moment in proclaiming her disgrace, and asking for vengeance on her violator ?, But still less likely is it that she would have concealed 1 a disgrace to which her own sister had been an eye , witness. These. I apprehend, were the grounds on i which the acquittal took place; and not, as has been . on a mere rule of low. If the young woman had been treated with the violence she has described, she must and would ham told her parent. That she' , was with child is a matter beyond doubt ; and it might by possibility happen that this young man was the father of that child ; but the violation must be i put altogether out of the question. Even this sur. mite, which I have made for the benefit of the young woman, is set aside by the oath ut the young man himself, who swears most positively that he never f had any connection' with her whatever ; and that his 1 evidence is at all deserving of discredit I can in no I respect discover. He is a respectable young tnan, and has given his testimony in a very unquestionable manner. I protest I was most anxious and,desirous. for the sake of this unfortunate family, that sanne thing might occur which would lessen the enormity of their guilt. The natural compassion of one's feelings, in seeing a man of education, and in hole orders, work up his mind to an offence for which there is no palliation, without using a harsher obser vation, led me to hope some circumstance might arise to lessen his guilt ; but it is with pain that I am di iven to say no such circumstance has transpired. That the young woman was pregnant by some person is beyond a dotfht ; but who as the father of the child is a matter of speculation. Some lurking secret at which we have not yet arrived, and which from this trial we ate not likely to unravel, yet remains be- hind. What could be the motives for concealing the real father, and fixing it OR an innocent man, is be, yond our ability to discover. If the charge of vin 'lotion against James Harris is false, the next question for your consideration is, did the defendants agree to bring forward the charge, knowing it to be false ? With respect to the young women, as they both swore to being present, no doubt can exist of their guilt.— As to the lather, perhaps, the evidence is not so con clusive. You, Gentlemen, however, will weigh well the circumstances which have come before you, and say whether you believe a father could have lived eight months in the house with his daughter in a s:,..te of pi egilancy, without discovering her situation? and nest, whether you believe he could have been the dupe of such a story as that which has been told, even from his ..wit daughter ? In the defect of the evidence against the father you have nothing but the general circumstances of the case, and the palpable falseness of the charge. You will consider w:ietner the natutal sagacity of a man of good education could really have persuaded him to give credit to so foul a charge ? If you are not fully satisfied of his guilt, you will acquit him by your verdict. The same observation applies to the daughters; but if you think they were all privy to the conspiracy, you will find your verdict accordingly. The Jury, after a few minutes consultation, found all the defendants Guilty. Mr. Baron GRAHAM immediately proceeded to ' pronounce sentence on the defendants. He observed. that during the whole of his judicial life, Wisner left inure pain than In the performance of his duty on the present occasion. It WAS impossible to imagine a ease more melancholy than that which was now before him. A Clergyman of the Church of England, a character which stood so high in this country, con. victed on the clearest and most satisfactory evidence, of a most abominable and atrocious conspiracy—a crime which became still more dreadful from his having induced his two daughters to follow him in his career, and to bear a part in his foul load of infamy. He confessed he knew not bow to do justice. Compassion for the infirmities of human ' nature might induce him to alleviate the severity of punishment; but in this case all compassion was swallowed up in the contemplation of the scene before ' him—a scene Which presented to his view a man, who, in spite of the benefits of education, and the 1 dictates of religion, had sunk to the last degree 'of human crime. The sentence of the Court was, that' the Rev. R. Woodward should be imprisoned in the common gaol of*, county of Bedford for two yearns and that hii daughters, Sarah and Susanna 1 should each be imprisoned one year in the same g Th e defendants seemed deeply affected with thei r maim. 14 Mr.Woodwsrd is a man about 50 years of age. His eldest daughter Sarah, has nothing prepossessing in her marine's or person, and is about 2.5. The youngest, Susannah, is rather a pretty girl, of fair complexion. Their fate has excited but very little commiseration in the County. MAIDSTONE ASSIZES, MARCH se. Jaws and Gene Posed stood capitally Indicted, for having, on the 25th of July, at Bridge, in this County, assaulted Zephaniah Fry, putting him in fear and danger' of his We, and taking from his person several Bank of England notes, and three'notes of thc,Caata bury Union Bea ko_togctiter with, oro go lam in gold, a silver watch, gold seal, ilcc. amonatiog in value to £2OO, his property. The prisoners in this case were post-boys, and, together with* third man, stopped Mr. Fry, on his road from Doveft:aost7an terbury, dragged him out of hi s g i g , an d his pockets of the property stated in the indictment. Mr. Fry swore most positively to the persons of the pri— soners, who were taken up at Woolwich, on the oth of August following, the eldest one, James, having opened an eating-house with his portion of the spoil. An attempt was made to prove an orshi It pa" of both the prisoners; this was successful i case of George, who was acquitted, but James was found Guilty—Death. The indictment again s t several persons tie boar* ing the Hope luggage boat, near E r i t b, on t h e night of the Slit of October last, fastening down the Master and his brother, ad sseatios upwards of three hundred pounds worth of tea sod other articles, oc cupied six hours on Friday. Gib bad before r pleaded guilty, and on being admonished by she' Judge that be would derive no mercy by such plea, he said that he should persist in it, as he would not' chose to die with a lie in his mouth. Um, his asso ciate, was capitally convicted ; and harder and King i the two receivers, were found guilty, and mutate so fourteen years' transptetation, Gidduns, it will be recollected, is.thew who, to save his We,. Wished to *him and Rive eiidence against two others, as being concerned in the murder of Lieutenant Johnson. A great number of indictments were found against a family named Coley, consisting of a father, mother.' and three sons, for sheep stealing, and numerous other off.nces. One of the sons was capitally con victed, another was transported, and the third is not yet in custody ; the father was transported lot four teen years, and the mother acquitted. The arduous and almost unparalleled labours of the Judges at these Assizes were not brought to a close till six o'clock this evening, when sentence of death was passed on the capital convicts. Qn Wednesday evening Mr. GuliNs.v sat, for the first time as a Judge, to try prisoners, and every .one who heard him was highly gratified at the dignity of his deportment, his precision, and his humanity. YORK LENT ASSIZES. Patrick Doering, abet Dr. Bell, alias fir' Aterr, was indicted for feloniously assrulting Anne Broadbent, abed 14, of Quick, in the month of July last, and forcibly violating her person. The circumstailces of this atrocious case are briefly these :—The prisoner is about fitty.four years of age, and bore some close relation to the parents of the procecutrix. Oa the day stated in the indictment, he called, it appeared, on horseback, at the house where the object of his detestable passion resided,. and where, alter imposing upon her credulity that sometLiog was to be communicated to her of interest, at a short distance, relative to her mother, she consented to Ac company him, and he placed the child behind him on the horse.. After riding about two miles, the child began to express her anxiety to reach the wished for house where she was to receive the intelligence from her mother, then, as she supposed, at Liverpool; and, in consequence of this im,. ittence, the prisoner stopped at a public-house, where he tried to satisfy her inquiries, called for reliesement, and induced the child to take some gin. He then ;ensued his way, tatting her, as'before, behind him oe the !terse, and they travelled on until it became nearly dark, when the prisoner rode into a wide common, far from the public road and the reach of human habitation. Here, A.m. various guilty artifices, and callous to the cries of his helpless victim, he twice perpetrated his diabo lical purpose: Having subsequently extorted a pledge, or rather threatened the prosecutrix, as to making the matter known, he remounted his horse, and pro ceeded back with her towards her residence. On the way thither, she•stopped at the house of a female friend to tensile for the night, and to her she made ' known t!!e whole of what had passed; and among other things, stated, that one of the reasons adduced' by the prisoner to her (the prosecutrix) in extenua tion- of the crime he had committed ores, that her mother had requested him to do it ! [The latter disclosure excited feelings of the mmt revolting nature in the Court, and caused the Lear ned Judge to animadvert and scrutinize the circum stance with becoming severity.] After the commission of the offence, the prisoner absconded, but the most vigorous measures being as instantly adopted for his apprehension, he was traced into Ireland, and eventually secured at Newsy, in the northern part of that country: On his way thence to the Castle of York, he endeavoured to bribe the Officers who had him in custody, in order to se cure his own retreat; or in consideration of their se erettng the child (the prosecutrix) at the time of trial, offered to secure them a reward of 100 pieces of Irish linen, valued at least at ed per piece. The prisoner, after a patient and most impartial trial, which lasted four hours, was found Guilty, and he was subsequen ly sentenced by Mr. Justice BAY- I Lit' to death, who, in the most feeling and impres- I sive manner, impl , red him to prepare for that awful ' eternity to which the offended laws of Goa and his country bad to justly consigned him. The prisoner exhibited every mark of obduracy and contempt throughout the trial. W. Townley was indicted for the commission of an offence similar to the last, but under still more shock ' ing and disgraceful circumstAnors. He was charged with viel del, upon several oecasiens. the person of Mary Thornton, a chili under eleven years of age, and his own daughter-ire-law. The least of the cir lcumstances of this case we dare not expose to the pub lic eye, but the fact, were simply but clearly proved by the infant preeecutrix. A Medical Gentleman ieW peeved distinctly the injury sustained by the child. Mr. lattice BAYLtY, however, in addressing the Jury, was of opitroo that the mere story of the child, l unconfirtnedeby other corroboratire . testimony, would I not warrant thetas to conic to a conscientious conclusion of the prisoner's guilt. The child, it was true, he said, had jabot toed her moiler of the infamous at tacks of the prisoner; but that mother, in point of law, could not give evidence against her husband : for those wise reasons, that domestic divisions or 'fa mily differences might induce her to state an untruth to the prejudice or iujary of her husband. • The prisoner was in consequence acquitted, and after a severe admonition from the Court, discharged. Nicland Marmon was indicted for the wilful murder of Henry Hoyle, an infant of four years old, at Hud dersfield, on the 20th of February last. This case Wits one' orPeenliar enormity, inasmuch as the priso- 1 ner was the father-in-law of the deceased, having 'married its mother about a year previous, and since' which he had treated the child with great barbarity. Martha Mooting deposed, that on the day stated in the indictment she was in the house of the primmer, when she saw the latter etrike the deceased a vio lent blow on the head ; she did not perceive the child do'any thing to eicite this violence, and it cried bit terly; witness soon after perceived its eye and face greatly swelled, and a doctor was sent for by the mother; the prisoner was asked also to go tor a doc tor, aid be affected to comply, but did not'retuin ; the doctor was brought by the sister of the deceased. Mary Anne Hoyk said she was sister to the de ceased. and was in the room with the latter the day ' of his death; the child havi ng got a fall, cried one' when the prisoner gave him a b lo w on the head, and said, 4 , if he did not give over, be would give him fieotimes as much ;" the prisoner isofnediately laid told of the child, seized him by the arms, and flung him down upon the pound; witness could not say with what lone he dashed the child upon the ground, but she saw it soon afterwards, and observed its face much swelled and blackened; the prisoner went for 'a doctor,. but did not return until late at night; the child lingered nine days:and died. Mr. Justice AATI4I7, ia mataing up the evidence, - . put hi the jury to decide whether theie seal su.F. cient evidence to convict the prisoner of sip serious a crime as that of Murder—or whether it would not be more consistent with justice to conclude, that the in,- jury dine to the deceased by the ptisoner was mo the east of a sudden impube of passion, than of previous malice or deadly hate. The Jury It tving &liberate,' a few minutes, found the trisoner Guilty of Mar - slaughter ; and Mr. Jus tice BAYLEY having expat:rted with becoming seve rity 'Jinni his gross inhumanity, and the violation of that duty which should have secured his protecti J.l towards the life he had sacrificed, sentenced hi a to one year's imprisonment. A t the Lincolnshire Assizes, Efir!P Erarl7, A mrn dicant, was found guilty of enticirri away t re iuferc daughter of William Pearson, of 133stori, aged rinc years. Sentence postponed. At the Assizes for the COnnly of Meath, at Trim: on Monday last, five of the villains who robb.d chi house of Mr. Sillery, of Carrickleck, County of Meath; and murdered his ;vivant, on the rj A ht of the 19th Or: were capitally ctinvie:vd, and ordered to he elem. d. The 12tli inst. Michael C4i,r, alias (!aithin Collier; Was tried for robbing 13ridget Lines, a passenger its the Newry Fly coach, qr. u e Jaly, ISIS. The Jury, after two boon!' Lie;ihet a. ion , acquitted him. Friday se'nnight a Coronet's Inquest wit'. held at Sackville, county Dahlin, on the body of Deniiis Slat tery, who was shot by a s , ,ldier at the wreck at Dianna. Verdict—Wilful Miat,eer against Patrick Healy, pii- Yate in the 3oth regim e nt. HALL.—S.iturdly M.Ty San WAS charized as a cheat and yap, am, at the it stance ot Jane VeAl, who stated, that in consequence of the :7risr.re;'s I:tme she was induced to go to her, having doubts As to the result of a mairimailial specol.ition, at her le•. sisience in Lock's-fields. Slre informed her she came to have her iortune told. The prisoner said, that at a preliminary step, she roust mak,: an ftEerini. of N. od. This being complied with, she was 'alms into a room, where she was kit surroivided with serpents, alligators, glares, tele.copes, There the remained for hill an hour, when she was joined by the pri-onet's son. He a sked several ques tions as to her age, Etc. alarmed k.r by his rudeness. and then suffered her to go away, :and sheiinm diately gave information of what had passed. May pro duced A number of books on the occult sciences, tele. scopes, Sec. found at the old I zdy's lodgings. The prisoner said, the business of fortun-f-relliog was not carried on by her, but by Ito . son ; she only acted as poiteress. It; however, the Magibtraie would Emotive her, she promised in future to desist frim her offi , !c, And from telling fortunes altogether. Se eral neigh bours „:eve her a good charac:er ; ::rod the Magi. strafe, on her promise of future good behaviour, dis missed !lei. CLERIC/IL /Xi ELL/GENCE. NORWICII, MARCH 21. On the 22d day of February the Rev. James Spears, Clerk, was instituted to the Rectory of E.lntset, Suffolk, on the presen tation of ;lie Master and Fellows of Clare Hall, Cambridge. On the Gilt instant the Rev. Thomas Jones, Clerk, A.M. wit Ikensed to the Perrerual Curacy of Stoke by CLue, Suffolk, on the nomination of Sir W. B. Rush, Ilan. Wednesday, the Rev. Robert Steele, Clerk, was instituted to the Rectory of Mundesky, on the presentation of the King by reason of his Duchy of Lancaster. OXFORD, MARCH 22. Wednesday last, the Rev. Henry Wetherell,of University Cot lege, was admitted Bachelor in Divinity. Grant Componader 'Jae Rev. Arthur Edward Howinau. ?LA. of Queen's Clkeile, Cambridge, has been adulated ad eundent. EGCLE.IA.IICA rty.txturiuNs. A Dispensation has been granted to the Rev. Robert W c i ; to, Chartain to the Mon Noble the Marg.:is of Bui.k:nr.. ham, to Tied the Rectory of Orn.gron, with ktinn Abbas, to ;:.e county of Southampton. Wednesday se'nuight, the Rev. W. I. Mans-1. A'. l l. was in itlta.ed, by the I.erd Bishop of this Diocese, to the Rectory of Hethe, on the presentation of the Lord Chancellor. Tile Rev. Wm. Stephen Giay, B.A. is presented to theßectory of North Funibridge, Estes. Tim Rev. W. H. Cite" to the Rectory of Cold Higieam, Northant i Aiinthlre. The Key. U. F. Tavel, M.A. to the Rectory or Campsey Mb, Suffolk. The Re•. Dr. Randolph, Prebendary of Mimi!, Ca ' the vakhd.le iterory of m • Pun's, Covent-garden, L mina The Kt , Thom,' Oldfield Barlett, of Wareham, Durst, the It.e=a4 y of Swanage, in .he Lie ul Porb,ek. The Nevi C. ti. Pdynter, Perpetual Caret of Lower S • Culumb, and C. , C•nuwall. MAKAILD. The Rev. James Davies, son 01 the Rtv. Iletay Davies, of Ringwood, to ss Jermoly., of Nluirre Pi ice. Rev. George of Yariuou:h,ro Chsn:otte,el.lcd; daughter of Mr. John Lucy, t... 11 'h r, of Notes r. Match 17, Rotor. Letlie Dorrocr Chayr , .ol, E.q. to Mary, daogirer o' the Rev. k.. ittPlor of 11.t..i..t0t. Wed:wit/ay, Ale. Cooper, to n.pg gtot.ro to his Royal I+l,l - the Duke or York, to Mll4. Ai, tr:l, u: Newmarket. llib.1). In the Wand of Guernsey, the Rev. E. Gilbert, Rector of St. Asides., in that island, and one of the French Preachers u the ChPrßoyal, St Janus's. a i rch il, at Troy loan, Rochester, Cait. /uxon, of tin ul Regiment of Fuot. Wediseiday, at Cockfield-hall, aged 15, Henry, fourth sou of filrebarles Blois, Bart. March IK , At golehtster, of a decline, wife I,l ;:t gen?nt hales Lagar, of the Hun. East India Cod:rait , ; ..:rvice, aged :tt. Smulay sennisht, at the Parsonage, in lttirnt!hrh, i.s the year of her age, 11.111tilla Jesnima, youngest ilat.ent:r et the ker. John Morgan, late Rector of dm parith, and whom she sateired only three weeks. Mardi 13, at Clieltfmtd, Keen, aped 74, the Rev. Peter Corr ton, D.D. late fteLtatir of All souls, Prebendary of i tut ttivai,it. and Rector of Chelsfiel.l, and St. Dungan's, hi the E tit. At Oikley, Surrey, In his Gstit year, the Rev. Thornas %Vote:- moire, ir.D. Rector of that parish, and %. icar of Ovitig, Sasses, and late Fellow of Clare i , af , Cambridge. Saturday se'unight, at their encampment at Honifon, Mrs. 80 , - will, slater to the Queen of tiic (Alines. sac was interred at tie. anon with gteat pump. 1 hwrsday, Sturgeon Smith, 1?..q. of Colchester. The ileirea.ed. in returning trona u tst ;t:or amt the preceding Friday cocci..., had proceeded but a shunt dttance, when his horse. it ts .e,.• posed, audJuily seamed, and :brew him with tuck vitriciier as 10 produce a concussion of the brain. Intlet Uk J 1 CZ Bank Stock, shut 3 per Ct. Itsduced t•hat 3 ps4 Ct. Cots. 49i 70 4 per Com shut i per Cent. /Cm 99ii3i law. 3 ptr Cent. UTZ — % sruk 114 7 t Lorg -‘tuss. sing India Stock liidt.i itoikts S 4 PS pr Each. Bills (24d.) 9 pr. Consols (or A c.111;1: Linicry Tickcis AVElltAted PRICE of CORN usENC.I..ANI) rim from the returns ending the 15th o. March, 147. Wheat. Rye Bartel. Oars. lie...ts. Peas. e. d. le. d. e. d. a. 41. I a I . '• 605 49 3 ISOII 54 5 (:.13 The averege Puke of Sugar, culminated from the II trro. m t I In the week ending the 19:11 el Marsh, is 445. 94J. 1. o t•ct• MOH WA Ikkt TO MORROW AT LOPflituN .1 •••t; - 4- Mgrtling - 31 min. attar Afternoon . . LONDON: kisatel by Laval. Kati, Pick.r.:':o; rablibbed there, and at the Sca•Cdties caryit-ISat. I ' 1