Star. — London, England, 1822-10-17 00:00:00

. . . . _ . . . _ • I t ••• 1 4' ' , s'' , :ft • . . , . . . .601 . , .. . .: • • „, •• • Lam. 4.::* • • . . )„,. .. .1 . •.... -- .--:, -99.1 ..- • '' . • . - -- . s. • - - - • t , .. s . .., .•. .. ..• • . , • -: - • • . e. •a. ..,. ~... A , • •- . A (.... - r -l b ie • I P; 's. , o. l *- ( --Tfit ; 43.,„... - JAI' ' ~`,W, ' • 'il {) •` ). ; _ : . ' . ,--, ......... i - 7 - • .... ? -.....vi0r THURSDAY, OCTOBER 17i .1 ) 822. • - ,.. ,. . ;:• 1 . • .. .A . .. ~ ; . IPR, ieh 44 VEN —PENCE .11 ..... • . -. : 1 _._..... NEW NOVEL. for the hi* otilopillaraa and cat. 0. certain rates in . Wbiti" i .... Tilis was a ver,y lifted, fact, the levyini r -, • . . .. : ... chapel ; and this fact, together .with 'the custisitt 11 iv i ng This day was published, in Three Vols. 12mo. pricalils. boards, moderate cSarge. ' • . Os- 1 t iatiftitt_eba: spoke of, tvonld, he thnuglir, sustain t h e eterAnt l os . d'ASMOND. a Tale.—Bv the Author of " -Tna The . Jury found a Verdict for the 4 -.- ot 1 :v-- I • ", , y ,t • . I t Ni—sturat 11L 126 APELPHI THEATRE, STRAND. the Public are respectfully informed that Mr. WKssicH, having sufficiently recovered, will, with Mr. Joni. Raters, Mr. Os saver, and Mr. WALSOURN, have the honour of appearing before them this Evening. in Tom and Janes. - I Published, - -.prieelll , OSMON D, a Tale.—By the Author of " Tan 'A7071170 07 NATl1118." • Printed for U. and W. B. Whktaker, Ave-Maria-kne- Also, lately pubikked Tug Favittrarrs 71r NATURS, i Novel, n three vols. lino. Third Raton, prier 21s. boards. Tel; spoke of, would, lotignr,sustalo theetelnptio*.. The LORD CoIEF Jusrtcs•th ught that titiN at*. MIA was important; but perhaps the better, way would be to make a ease of it. His LordaLip tted the Jury that some doubt did exist as tt. the applica. tion of the last Act ; and The Jury. under his Lordship s disarm found a verdict—Damages, Is. crisis, 404. Stiliject to a case. ifISPCSIV4I snssToms, OCTOBER 16. • WADSRA LL tamers. Mr. DWAINE*, 00 irthalf of Me..r.. 13(311 and CYR, 11 - wPrOprietorS of the above place of amusement, ap plied for a license for opening these Gardens in the *eftsuing.surnisser t and he begged that, in addition to having " public musk," the Proprietors may be per mitted to have professional dancers to attend there occasionally. It was observed by one of the Magistrates, that a syttilar application had, been made on a former oc casino, when it was thought proper not to accede to cher - wishes . of the then Prooietors. Mr. HEDGER inquited i;hether, if permission was given by license to have these occasional ballets, It would have the effect of restraining-such part of the company who were not licensed from dancing? Mr. LAWSON said, there was form..liy an under. standing on the granting of the license, that there was to be po dancing whatever. Mr. DEHAINES said the Proprietors pledged them selves that no masquerades shculd be introduced, and they would confine their intended new eihibi tions to dancing. He also said they were ready to enter into any security that may be requited of them. Mr. PAGE said, upon such an understanding, he should not oppose the granting of the license in its new form. THIS EVENING, THURSDAY, Ost. 11, and during the Week, will he presented (97th time) the cele brated Out-and-Out Classic, Comic Operatic, Didactic, Aristophanic, Localic, Analytic, Terpsichoric, Panoramic, Camera Obacuratie Extravaganza Burletta of Fan, Frolic, Fa shion, and Flash, in Three Acts, called TOM . AND JERRY; Oil,. LIFE IN LONDON! • Ii Tbla day was published, in 12tne. price ss. 64. boards, The Second Edition of AN EPITOME of CHEMISTRY; wherein the Principles of the Science are illustrated, in One Hundred entertaining and instructive Experiments, capable of being per formed without the aid of any Apparatus, except a few Wine Glasses, an Oil Flask, and a Crucible, and unattended with the least Danger. Corinthian Tom, Mr. Wrench; Jerry Hawthorn, Mr. John Reeve; Logic, Mr. Wilkinson ; Jemmy Green, Mr. Oitherry, (from the Theatre Royal, Haymarket, his Ist appearance here) ; Squire hawthorn, Mr. Buckingham; 111 , Lush, Mr. Ball; Prinsent, Mr. Elliott ; Cribb, Mr. Lee; O'Boosle, Mr. Salter; Tartar, Constable of the Night. Mr. Daly; Tattersal, Mr. Phillips; Jack the Gaslight Man, Mr. Chapman; Sir Harry: B!ood, Mr. Dennis; Billy Waters, Mr, Paulo ; Dusty Bob, Mr. Walbourn ; B e ggar , Mr. S mith ; Ragged Jack, • Mr. Shaw; Little Jemmy, Tyr. Cooper; Hon. Dick Trifle, Mr. Brown ; Queersem, Mr. W. Reeves ; Marker, Mr. Rignold.— Principal Dancers—Mr. St. Albin, Mr. W. Kirby, and Mias Simpson ; Harlequin, Master Harvey; Clown, Master Bellam ; Columbine, Miss Chlvers ; African Sal, Mr. Sanders ; Coun tryman, Mr. J. Shaw ; Noddy Bray, his brother, Master Smith field ;—Kate, Mrs. Ilaker ; Sue, Miss S. Pitt; Jane, Miss Ham mersley ; Mrs. Tartar, Mrs. Daly ; Mrs. Denis, Mrs. Bryan ; Princess Plumante, Miss Pitt ; Countess Conversation", Miss F. Pitt ; D.tchess of Diamonds, Mrs. Dennis, Lady Ka-tel4l, Mrs. s=ay.—Watchmen, Poundage Coves, Guinea Pigs, Copers, Divers, &e. Mews. Proud; T. Smith, Padbury, J. Sanders, Brady, Gay, Wallis, Martin, Hart, &c. -.. By the Rev. JOHN TOPHAM, Of St. John'. College, Cambridge, Head Muter of Bromegrove Omani! School, Wort:env-shire. Printed for O. sad W. B. Whittaker, A•e Marie.larre. 441.1! 7'ELLIGENCE. After which the admired thirletta of WHO'S TO FATHER ME? Colonel Talbot, Mr. Buckingham ; Sir Oliver Oldsmar, Mr. Ilaty; Captain Belford, Mr. Clam: ; Mandeville, Mr. Chap- Tian; Buckle, Mr. Salter ; Jacob Butt', Mr, Phillips; Billy Butts, Mr. Wilkinson ; Servant, Mr. Sanders.4'.Charlotte Old stook, Mies S Pitt; Harriet, Miss Brady; Mrs. Butts, Mrs. Bryan ; Betty, Miss Jerrold. 4a. Pit, 2s. Gallery, Is. Doors opened at Six, and Performance begin a Quarter before Seven. Half-price at Half past Eight. The COURT, after consulting fot some few minutes, gave their approbation of a license being wanted for Public Music and Dancing." OLD ENGLISH SCHEME. eIARIIOLL, in conjunction with the other C0n v..../ tractors for the present Lottery, has felt it his duty to comply with the public wish, by the revival of the plain strait forward Schemes of the old English Lotteries, in which there art no Classes, no Fixed Prizes, nor any Stock Prizes. Any further comment or r ecommendation of the Scheme, on his part, must he unnecessary, as he is assured tha: what the Public have called for they will patronise. The present Lottery begins on the 30th of THIS MONTH, and contains 120 CAPITALS, including S of E 20,000 3 of £2,000 10,000 10 ... 1,000 2 ... 5000 20 ... 500 And Eighty of £3OO and £2OO. Schemes at large may be had gratis, at CARROLL's Fortu nate Offices, 19, Cornhill, and 26, Oxford-street, where he sold, in the List and late Lotteries, a great proportion of the Capital Prizes, including FIFE of A 830,000 and FIVE of X 20,000. , I THE MONTHLY CENSOR. No. V. was pub lished October 1, price is. 6d. containing Fifty Articles, amongst which are the following: TusoLnoy—Burrow's Summary of Faith and Practice—Ran ken's Ingitutet of Theology—Bishop of London's Charge— Archdeacon of Derby's Charge—Gillespie on the Seasons—Gas kin's Farewell Sermon—Evans's Duties of the Poor—Broad Stone of Honour. Putrrt—Nelan's Speech, and Tracts on the Pocr Laws—Europe bad America, by De Penh—Hughes, Chatfield, Lord Erskine, and Sheridan, on the Greeks—Life e rienfentlto Cellitii—Simond's Switzerland. -Pnrsms—Pres sot on Copernicus—Siborn's Instructions—Letter to Soanc, on the New Churches--Sussexiensis ore Wyatt's Monumental Tro phy—Hogg on the Culture of Carnations. Puitower—Coeur ' tie Lion, by Miss Porden—Errors of Extade--Is'm it odd— Court of liolyrood—Loilards—House of Ravenspur —Remains of H. K. White—and Index Aristophanicus. Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington, €4, St. Paul's Church yard ; and 3, Waterloo-place, Pall-mall; and G. and W. D. Whit- , taker, 13, Ave-Maria-lane. • Lately published, price 3s. 6d. boards. OASES ILLUSTRATIVE of the TREATMENT of DISEASES of the EAR, both Local and Constitu tional; with practical Remarks relative to the DEAF and By J. H. CURTIS, Esq. Aurist to his Majesty, and Surgeon to the Ruyal Dispensary for oiseasea of the Ear, &c. Printed for T. and G. Underwood, 32, fleet-street ; Black, klinburgh ; and Hodges and M'Arthur, Dublin. " The profession, we conceive, are indebted to Mr. Curtis, for the persevering spirit with which, he cultivates the study of those diaeases affecting the organ of hearing, which, from their ob scurity and intricacy, can only be properly treated by a person entirely devoted to the subject.'—London Medical and Pliyoical Journal, March, 1822. • The cases detailed by Mr. Curtis are fifty-eight in number, and the treatment appears jo be judicious, simple, and success ful."—Medico Chirurgical Review, March, 1822. AROMATIC SPIRIT OF VINEGAR. THIS agreeable perfumed liquor (the original in vention of Mr. Henry) which is of well-known efficacy in relieving Faintness and headache, and in counteracting the effects of over-heated, close, or infected air, continues to he pre r-red, in the greatest perfection, by Messrs. THOS. and %V lißNßY,•Manufacturing Chemists, Ilancbester. It is sold in . I, ordnn, wholesale and retail, by Messrs. BAYLEY and Bi.rw, Perfumers, Cockspur-street ; and Retail, price ts. 9d. by une :.gent er more in every principal Town ; but it cannot be genuine, unless the names of the above preparers are engraved on the Government stamp, which is fixed over the cork of each box. Proper Sponge Boxes are sold by Bayley and Blew, as usual.— As above may also be had, authenticated by a si milar stamp, Hussy's CA ICLNILD Manumit*, in bottles at Ss. 941. or with glass stoppers, at 4s. Gd. BILIOUS AND LIVER COMPLAINTS.' A 5 a mild and effectual remedy for. all those dis. AI. orders which originate in a vitiated action of the liver and Liliary organs, namely, Indigestion, Loss of Appetite, Had ache, Heartburn, Flatulencies, Spasms Costiveness, affections of tLe Liver l &c . &c. DIXON's A NTIBILIOUS PILLS have rnet wilt more general approval than any other medicine whgt server. They unite every recommendation of mild operation with r:ccegsful effect, and require vo restraint or confinement whet s-ivr during their use. In tropical climates, where the conks cne-!ces o 1 redundant and vitiated bile ate so prevalent and alarm ing, they are an invaluable and efficient protection. They are likewise puculiarty calculated to eorreet disorders arising Irons excesses of the table, to restore the tone of tbeotosasch, and to remove most complaints occasioned by irroodarity of the bowels. Sold in Boxes at 'is. 9d. 61. 11s. sad nu by Butlers, ate mitts, No. 4, Cheapside, and 220, Ilegast.strees„, Loam ; 20, W.tterleo-plase Edinburgh ; 34, Sack.llleastrest, DOW ; an/ by tin priocl;sl 141sodislise Vanden tlieouglisid: lbw Witted hire ti, moderate charge. The . Jury found a verdict for the plald&tai mages 22i. 16s.—Costs 40s- RetL M. SLAMS. • Mr. GURNEY stated this to be the ease of an in dictment on the prosecution of certain inhabitants of the parish of St . ..Mettle-bonne; against W. Blades, of Cumbefland•atreet, err die same parish, for keepine a hotise of ill-fame, No. 1, Cambeetand-street, And another leriese of a similar description in. the New road. The street had been for some time infested with many nuisances of the same character, but the inhabitants having United together ao rid themselves of such neighbours, had succeeded in putting down every one of their strong holds, with the exception of that which was now proceeded against. Witnesses having been called to prove the charac-. ter (lithe house, NO. 1, Cumberland-street, and of ita tenants and inmates, • Mr. Joicas, who appeared for the defendant, un . • &stook on the part of h i client that the nuisance, should be.abated. COURT OF RING'S BENCH, OCTOBER te. Mr. Guesret, on the iinderstanding that the nui-! FOXWELL O. WEST. sance should be so bonfr p fde abated, was willing to This was an actinic brought to recover the - value of accede to his Learned Friend's proposition to take a a bill of exchange for '1720. verd , ct of Gtliltv, by consent ; and if the event should Mr. Scanzett shouly stated the circumstances confirm the defendant's pledge, he also intimated that out of which the action arose, The bill was drawn the defendant would not be brought up for judgment. by Mr. J. West, dated Dorking, &nil 29, and at two —Verdict accordingly. months after date, on S. Barclay, Esq. a half-pay NIGHTINGALE o. THE CHURCHWARDENS OF WHITE- Officer, resident at the same ()face, by whom it was ac cepted. •At maturity it was dishonoured . ; and the plaintiff,!as he was legally competent to d'., bad Mr.GURNEY, on opening this case, said that' it was an action brought against the defendants for having chosen to. proceed against Mr. West, as the drawer. made a false return to a Mandamus, which had Tliiiperson, however, had resisted payment on thed issued ground that notice of the dishonour had not been from this Court, directing a true return to be made orthe proceedings which had taken place in the eke given to him until it was too late for the holder to recover of him at law. But it would be shown, that tion ..f a sexton for the parish of St. Mary, White -resided in London, al- chapel. By -an Act passed in the 58th of Geo. 111. in point of fact, Mr. West though nominally in this case resident at Dorking ; (the l Select Vestry Act), it was provided and declared that all persons and that the very earliest notice possible was given to paying an annual rent of more than £5O should Mr. West, him, by letters addressed by the holder to rochial vestries ; and so on, according to a• scale both at Dorking and in London. Several witnesses were called on behalf of the plain- therein set forward. The plaintiff conceived, that by tiff, when it appeared that the bill, Which was made excluding the votes of such as were privileged to tender more than one vote each, a Mr. Wildman had payable .at l‘tessrs. Woodhead an d C o .' s , in the been unduly elected to the office in question ; for the Shand, and had been indorsed by West to Messrs. Hickson, was dishonnttred on the 2d of July. It was' Gentlemen of Whitechapel had on a former occasion sent back on the 3d to the bankers at rethury, come to a resolution that this Act of Parliament did not apply to them. • The Jury wool , ' find, however, through whom it had been paid to Sir Jame. Esdaile that in terms it did apply, and it was not the vote of and Co. London : and having been regularly, and without delay, transmitted through the several hands a Vestry which could set it aside. The plaintiff, how . into which it previodsty passed, was at length re- ever, who had most votes including the plural one - , was not accepted as the returned candidate; and a turned to the plaintiff. him - The LORD CHIEF Jostle e held that sufficient notice Mr. Wildman, who had more single votes than had been given ; particularly asit took - place on the self;had been declared sexton. These were circumstances the e under which the plaintiff now sought 4th, his for the 3d being Sunday, the law would presume lemedy.„ • that the earliest legal notice bad been transmitted John Smith, the Vestry Clerk of the parish of St.' subsequently to the dishonouring of the bill. Marv, Whitechapel, said, the office of sexton being The defence was not gone into ; and the Jury im- vacant, - an election of a candidate ro fill it was held mediately found a verdict for the plaietiff—Damages o n the 11th and 12th of December, 1821, in the £2l. 16s. (including the interest), and 40, costs. Vestry-room. Mr. Nightingale was one of the can ti• CRABS& didates, and had 639 votes; Mr. Wildman, the other, This was an action to revive compensation for loss had 631. The number of votes given by persons en of hire of a cart and horse belonging to the plaintiff, titled to more than one vote each was 167. None of and which had been seized with a quantity of quick- Mr. %Vildman's frienth tendered more than one vote. silver, the property of the defendant, by whom the Mr. SCARLETT admitted that there would have cart had been hired. been a majority for the plaintiff, if the plural votes Mr. GURNEY, in opening the case, observed,• as it tendered for him had been accepted. appeared that the quicksilver had been wrongfully The LORD CHIEF Justice under total Mr. Scarlett seized, the duties having been duly paid, the only to wish the Court to consider (taking the various question was, whether the plaintiff must seek his re- books of rates, Btc. produced in this cause as read), medy of the defendant, or of the parties by whom whether the Act, which gave a plurality of votes' in such seizure had been made. certain cases was or was not operative in this instance M. Hickman, the son of the plaintiff, proved that —whether the parish was or was , not to be entirely in September last defendant hired the horse and cart, governed by the Act ? belonging to his father, to go to East Smithfield. He Mr. SCARLETT said that was his meaning. put into the cart a great number of bottles, contain- The witness stated that Wildman was considered ing, as it afterwards appeared, a quantity of quick- to hive been re•elected according to the usual custom silver. When witness had arrived at the docks, an of the polish. Witness was examined, at considerable Officer of the Excise came up and desired to see the length, by Mr. GURNEY and Mr. SCARLETT as to the necessary documents to shew that the duties were principle on which it had been usual to levy the dit paid. Mr. Cralthe told him that he could scant satisfy ferent parish rates in Whitechapel. When the dis , him of that fact, and taking a paper out of his pocket, cu.sion took place as to the application of the Select accompanied the Officer into a counting-house, from Vestry Act to the election of the sexton (which was which they soon afterwards came out together, the immediately before that election was held), it was de- Officer observing that " that would not do ;" and then tided by the Vestry Meeting, that no plural votes pr )ceeded immediately to seize the horse, the cart, should be accepted. A Mr. Smith (Churchwarden) and the quicksilver. Witness asked the defendant protested against the decision, as witness believed ; what he was to jo? The defendant bade him go, certainly he-tendered his balances at the close of the home and leave the matter to him ; for he would see election, when the plural votes were rejected. that his father's horse and cart should bo driven back The Resolution of the Vestry was then read, which in less than an hour. This was Ina done ; but Mr. grounded its dissent from the application of the Act Crabbe called on witness's father that evening, and of Parliament (58 Geo. III.) on the Bth section, which assured him that he would take care that the hire of expressly exempts all parishes from its operation that the horse and cart, for the whole pc: iod of their deten- are governed by former Acts of Parliament. Lion, should be regularly paid. This promise had not The LL,RD CHIEF JUSTICE said this was evidently been fulfilled ; and the present action was for the loss illegal. The parish was bound by the Act, of course, of thirty-eight days' hire, • that period having elapsed if intended by the terms of the Act. between the seizure and the release which was after- The next Resolutiots was to the effect that the' wards made. churchwardens should be indemnified for all expenses Mr. Coasts', for the defendant, had two objections that might be incaried by reason of the election of to submit in bar of the present action. The first, that sextons being allowed to proceed after the old form, it was improperly brought; forasmuch as it should and custom of Whitechapel. rather have been an action to recover in the way of The Lon]) CHIEF JUSTICE held: this to be also' debt: the second, that - it should in any case have been clea .l y :it was a proposal to indemnify parties ' as against the Excise Officer by whom the seizure for resisting an Act of Parliament. had been made; the words spoken by defendant, ac- ' A Resolution was then recited regarding the course l cording to the evidence of the last witness, nut being to he pursued in the then ensuing election. This was sufficient to sustain the present .action. declared to be " unanimous." The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE was of opinion that the The LORD Cnizr Justice said this was mere non words were sufficient to sustain it. The defendant- *lie- The " uniniinous" Resolution just read was might have told the plaintiff, had he thought proper, i folloecal by " the protest of T. Smith, Req." against it. that he would see him paid, and then leave brought ls Mr. SCARLETT then contended, that though the his action against the Officer, which would . have' h oestion of: the apPiication.of the Statute to the City enabled him to do so. As it was, he had matle a and, Liberties of: Lemke', one or both of thorn, must promise explicitly enough to the plaintiff, who, iir far the present be considered as reserved, it was open consequence of that promise, might have been' pre- to him to shew that the Vestries of Whitechapel were Named from proceeding at the time (Us he fiethaps Held by custom. The custom was td allow one vote' would otherwise have done), by rnemorialiaing the• only to each inhabitant householder. Now,- the Bth. Board of Excise for the release of his horse and cart. Section of the Seieek Velure Act mewed those The same witness, cross-examined by Mr. Comex, .parishes' to which amp fames 2tatato, , or reeeivol *id' that the deli dent Eadleen Charged l'tis a day peculiar. custom applie* ,Seserel Acta had sop-. 241' ' li..‘. ;"‘ 3;. ASTLEY'S AMPHITHEATRE. Mr. CovnEv, on behalf of Mr. IVilliam Davis, ap. plied for a license for continuing the per formance at the above Theatre. For many years past the lieente had been gi anted to Mr. John Astley and Mr. Wm. Davis conjointly, but last year, when the api.lication was made for renewing it in their joint names, it was Cully anticipated that Nlr. Astley'sexiaence would be but of very short dutation ; and it so happened, that within two days after it was granted, that Gentleman died; upon which event the licen,e devolved into Mr. Davis's hand, as the surviving paltrier, and it was considered that he alone was entitled to all the, subsequent profits that were derived from the con cern, as it was he alone who had conducted it.- .\ Ir. Astley appointed executors of his effects (one of whom was Mrs. Astley), and tbose persons had takeir the reg ular steps to posseis themselve-, of his property, a nd had actually received from Mt. Davis the same portion of the rent of the Theatre as Mr. Astley would have done, bad he been living. It Was a fact (the Learned Counsel said) well known, that Mr. Davis was the person by w hose liecuniary assistance the Theatre had been' Supported for the last twenty years; and the reason . Why fir: stley's name had been so long kept before the Public was becaase it had been conceived that there was a kind of magic in his n one, which %\ as beneficial to the ht. wrests of the Theatre. Mr. Davis considered him self intitled to 411 the benefil derived front it imme diately on the death of Mr. Astley, hut he gene. ously waned his claim to a considerable extent; and made arrangements much to the advantage of Mi. Astley's creditors. By rat the greater part of the properties of the Theatre belonged to Mr. Davis; and although he had consented to account for the profits during the ) ear following Mr. Astley's death, he had under stood that it was the intention of Mrs Astley, by her Counsel, to oppose the granting of the license to him alone. Some allusion was then made to the peat y difficulties of the late Mr. Astley, with the view to' shew that Mr. Davis was, in fact, the only sub stantial. person in the cooce, n. Mr. EIRAT/I, on the part of Mrs. Astley, replied to the observations that a ere made telati‘e to Mr. Astley's difficulties; and said that it the licen , e was objected to in the name of Mrs. Astley and Mr. Davis jointly, he should make a motion fOr its being granted solely to Mrs. Astley. • • Mr. Cown ßY continued his argtiment.—He thebghf that the granting of a license of this description to a Lady was extremely improper, as a female, what. ever her merits might be, was not capable of pro perly conducting such a concern. Upon the general law of partnerships, it was contended, that Mr. Davie was entitled to all the advantages that were to be reaped from the Theatre; and to spew that he was really considered the surviving partner, receipts were Offered to be produied where he was. so described. It might appear hard' drat Mrs. Astley was not per mitted to share the profits; but if the subject was properly considered, the reverse would be seen, as it was well known that ,there was at this time the , greatest ditficulty in makirg Theatres produce any advantage, so that 'it would be extremely severe to compel Mr. Davis to give up a portion of the profits to a Lady who neither had eapital nor rah any risk; Under these ciieuntssances, he hoped the license w ould be' granted to*Mr. Davis exclusively. Mr. HsAru contended, that Mrs. Astley's case was very different 'from partnerships in general, as he was persuaded that Mrs. Astley's interest in the Theatre -was not alienated by the death of her husband. The Learned' Counsel continued at great length to :hew that attempts had been unjustly Made to deprive her a her property, with the intention on the part of Mr, Davis, of getting it wholly in his pc and • The CHAIRMAH, Mr . Haucr the Counsel having' continued tenhe time the. Gedirt at' shosold bee resod and Mr. Davis. . I >‘ .. . .4 “ 4-; 4 I). ‘ « ‘ ‘ . -"‘ ‘ ' . his pcsse.sion and power. WGER, Mr. T.Alarrow, and • nued a conversation for 'levet deckle& that' the cottjoioily to Mil. Asles •