Star. — London, England, 1823-04-23 00:00:00

PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, APRIL 22. The Papers which the Earl of Ltvaitroot. laid before the House, on the application of several Noble Lords, having been printed, were this day put on the table. The Duke of GLOUCESTER presented a Petition from the University of Cambridge, praying for the more effectual Abo lition of the Slave Trade in the West Indies. Hii Royal High ness fully concurred in the sentiments expressed by the Peti tioners, and said he was happy, in his character of Chancellor, to present it. Mr. Buxom, Lord STARLIT, and other Members from the Commons, brought up the Merchants' Apprentices Rill, the Army and Navy Pensions Bill, and several private Bills, which were read a first time. PORTUGAL. Lord HOLLAND rose to move for copies of all communi cations made by his Majesty's Government to his Most Faith ful Majesty, since the Ist of September, 1822, on the subject of the invasion of Portugal, together with the answers. It was most important that Parliament should have a clear understand ing as to the situation in which this country stood with Portu gal after the invasion of Spain, and he expressed a hope that the Noble Earl would not object to the production of the Papers. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said some of the Papers alluded to might be produced. There were others that could not come under the consideration of Parliament. The production of them was not, however, so necessary, because at the present moment there really was no doubt as to what really was the understand ing between the two countries. He could not he more ample in his statement respecting that understanding than he had been on a former occasion. He had already stated there was this short and complete understanding. This Government stood with reference to the Government of Portugal on this footing : if Portugal is attacked without hostility to warrant such attack, this cotintry is obliged to protect her. If she is attacked in con sequence of offensive acts, there was no obligation. In case of 4 invasion by the French, the obligation on this country to protect Portugal was unavoidable. That was distinctly understood to be the result of the negotiation. SLAVE TRADE AND AUSTRIAN LOAN. The Marquis of LANSDOWN rose to ask for two descriptions of Papers not connected with those on the table. The first was the Negotiation for the Abolition of the Slave Trade. He ‘A idled to move for the production, and the Noble Lord expressed ;lope that there could be no objection to comply with hi s motion, especially as it was a subject which pro duced much anxiety in persons who humanely took an interest in the question. The other subject. to which he should call the attention of the Noble Earl, was the negociation relating to the Austrian Loan. At an early part of the Session he took the liberty of making some inquiry on the subject, when the Noble Earl r..presmted that the negociation was in a state of forwardness. No information had since appeared on the table. It could not escape the House that a negociation with Spain, arising out of claims of a more recent date than the Austrian Loan, had been brought to a conclusion, and he should be glad to hear that some arrangement , had been made by Austria to pay the loan. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, with respect to the Slave Trade, all the papers relating to the nego ciatiori on that subject had been hill on the.table of the House. He bad nothing to add, nor retract. It Was true, as the Noble Marquis stated, that he on a former day mentioned, that the negriciation was con siderably advanced for arrangements founded on the Austrian Loan. Ausuia had intended to follow up the principle to the full extent, but the present state of foreign naticns had affected her funds. The me nacing position of Europe would not allow her to divest herself of so much money, but the principle of adjustment remained the same. His Noble Friend near him (the Duke of Wellington) was ready to con firm his statement. The pi incii.le of compromise had been negotiated, mid the Noble Earl - had reason to believe it would have been brought to a conclusion if the affairs in other countries had not taken an unex pected turn. He had no reason to say the terms pro posed might not be agreed on by all parties. They did not, however, expect to recover .the whole debt. E.trl DARNLEY adverted to the language of Mr. Pitt, when the loan was advanced. The strongest assurance was giv en that the Austrian Government would rep..y the money._ _ _ _ The Earl of LIVERPOOL observed, that neither Mr. Pitt nor hii successors had expected the loan would not be repaid. _ _ Earl GREY recollected the discussion in the House of Commons. Mr. Pitt, he said, dwelt much on the accredited securities of the Bank of Vienna.. There was no doubt, at that time, the whole would be re paid. He was glad, however, under a disappoint ment, to hesr the Austrian Government were de si ou to compound. Lord HOI:LA SD said, he had never expected to see the money at all, and he really considered Austria in a better state to pay it nox than during the last %var. Ile had not seen the Emperor of Austria's name in the Gazette—(A laugh)—but he found the Noble Earl intended to make him a bankrupt. It might be wise to get as much of the debt as possible. Lord ELLENHOROUGH expressed a wish to know the dates of the communications presented to the Spanish Government, with a view of settling the differences with France. The E4rl of LIVERPOOL said, the dates were recent—various dates. Lord ELLENBOROUGH asked, Why the nego tiations at Madrid were so suddenly broken off? The Earl of LIVERPOOL replied, that it was not the Fault of the British Ambassadors at Madrid. Their duty was discharged in the best manner. The dis cussion succeeded the question respecting the pira cies in the West Indies. Lord ELLENBOROUGH wished to know what alteration was proposed in the Spanish Constitution, and whether there were not alternatives? The Earl of LIVERPOOL said there were alter natives which could not be communicated. Earl GREY asked, whether the Noble Earl re. ceived communication on the subject of money sent by France to Spain? The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, his Majesty's Go vernment received information which induced a be lief that money was sent to Spain. TIM NAVY. The Earl of DARNLEY rose.—He had no doubt we should be soon involved in the war which had broken out in Spain; and therefore he wished to call the attention of the House to the state of our Navy. He had wished that our ships in ordinary had been kept in a state of complete equipment, both as to rigging, guns, and men; that they might-be ready in a case of emergency, such as was, he was sorry to say it, but too likely to happen soon. At all events, it was proper to keep this most important force of the country in a state of perfect readiness. This might be done by keeping a certain portion of our ilavitl power fit for immediate service, and this he was assured had been the policy of France since the peace. He hoped this matter would not be over looked by the Noble Lord at the head of the Admi ralty. His Lordship then moved for a Return of the Naval Force, and its state of equipment, in the ports of this kingdom. • Lord MELVILLE opposed the Motion, because it would not take in the vessels now out cruieing, or destined for foreign stations. Such a mullion as this seemed perfectly unprecedented. The Noble-Lord must be aware that the complement of the guardships had been diminished, because the men were employed in preventing smuggling on the coasts of Kent and Sussex. It had always been the policy of this coun try to keep the guard-ships with half complements in the time of peace; but the men were coming forward to man them as fast as they were wanted. At no time during the war was the whole crew of a ship of the line, or even of a frigate, composed of first-rate seamen. The guard-ships had always sufficient men for the purpose of exercising them. The Earl of DARNLEY shortly replied. The Noble Lord must agree that it was always the policy of this country to keep up a naval force sufficient for any sudden and unexpected emergency. The motion was negatived without a division. The Bills brought up from the Commons were read a first time.— Adjourned. 'IOUS* OF COMMONS. Mr. DENISON presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Farnham, in Surrey, praying the repeal of the Tax on Coals. Ordered to be printed. Dlr. I'. MOORE brought in a Bill for preventing Combina tions of Journeymen and providing a way for settling disputes in Trades. The Hon. Gentleman said, be hoped the Represen tatives of Manufacturing Towns would give their attention to this.measure, which he considered to be one of great importance. Ile wished for their assistance, and if he were wrong in any in stance, he hoped they would correct him. The Lill was read a first, and ordered to be read a second time on Monday, and to he printed. Dir. Aid( rmatt WOOD presented a Petition, very numerously signed, flour Halifax, in YL-rkshire, praying for a Reform in Par iiament.—Ordered to be printed. The worthy Alderman then presented a Petition from Horne Giles, a butcher, in Southwark, complaining of certain Sur charges, and praying relief.—Ordered to be printed. He also presented a Petition from John Williamson, of Ba. singhall-st reet, complaining of the number of graves disturbed in his neighbourhood, and praying for some law to-restrain such practices.—Ordered to be printed. Lord F. GOWER presented a l'etition from the Borough of Wick, against any alteration in the Duties on Sugar.—Ordered to be printed. Mr: 11013110 USE presented a Petition from Richard Chap. man, of Bagnigge Wells, against the Brer Bill. THE USURY LAWS. Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW then rose to move for leave to bring in a Bill to alter and amend the present laws respecting usury.— The Hon. and Learned Gentleman entered into a review of the laws as they at present existed, and repeated his former argu ments against them. lie observed, he did not press his present Motion on the House on his own opinion alone, for that was strengthened by that of a Committee of the House oq, the sub ject.—Leave given to bring in the Bill. • ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE IN IRELAND. Mr. C. GRANT said, he understood that his Right Hon. Friend, the President of the Board of Trade, had been represented to have said, in the .debate of Thursday last, that all the Governments preceding Lord Wellesley's. in Ireland, had been partial in the administration of justice. He was himself fully per suaded his Right Hon. Friend had not intended to make any such statement; but as an impression to that effect had gone abroad, he was persuaded his Right P.onourable Friend wouli now feel no objec tion to contradict it. Mr. C. WYNN was most ready to do that which his Right Hon. Friend requested, namely, to correct the error which had gone abroad on this subject. He certainly never did say what had been imputed to him: what he did say was, that in the appointment of the Marquis Wellesley to. the Government of Le land, he thought he saw a prospect of the unhappy differences being put an end to by the system of con ciliation which would, by his Government, be adopted towards all parties. _ _ Mr. PEEL said,•this was a most important sub ject, and one on which the Public ought to have the fullest inforthation.. He felt it his duty to say for himself, and on behalf of those who had acted with him for six years, that in no instance during the whole of that period had it ever occurred that any partiality had been shewn to the Protestants. The Government was always careful to inform itself, as far as possible, of the merits of every case; and never, in any one circumstance, had he known an instance in which a Protestant had been preferred to a Ca tholic, in any case, from religious prejudices. Such had been. the system adopted by himself—such had been the feelings of his lamented friend the Marquis of Londonderry—and such had been the practice of his noble and estimable friend who was at the head of the Irish Government during that period, he meant Lord Whitworth, and never did a greater man exist on the face of the earth. He felt it also his duty to extend the same sentiments, as regarded Ireland, to the late Attorney and Solicitor-General of Leland. Mr. C. GRANT said, whilst he was in office, the Lord Lieutenant never asked whether any party re commended to him was Catholic or Protestant. Mr. V. FITZGERALD rose, and was about to address the House, when Mr. CALCRAFT rose to order.—Unless this con versation became general, it ought not to proceed further. The Right Honourable Gentlemen opposite had proceeded eulogising each other and ,their• re spective .Governments; and one Right Honourable Es-Secretary had declared that his sentiments towards the Catholics were precisely the same as those enter tained by his successor. Then, if that was the case, that Right Honourable Gentleman was turned out because his sentiments were approved of— Mr. V. FITZGERALD rose to order.--:The Ho- nourable Gentleman had interrupted him by rising to order, and had himself fallen into er&'br by enter ing into the subject—(Hear, hear).—No; he had the same wish as that Honourable Member had expressed, namely, 'that this irregular conversation should pro ceed no furr i er—( Hear, hear). Mr. CALCRAFT acknowledged that he had been properly interrupted by his Right Honourable Friend. He hoped, however, if the Right Honourable Gentle men opposite did not again bring this subject forward themselves, that some one on his side of the House would, by motion, bring the subject fully before them. REFORM. Mr.PEEIIA M presented a Petition of the County of Lincoln in favour of Reform. Mr. ASHTON SMITH said he was not present at this Meeting, but still he was convinced, from the in formation he bad received, that there were not 500 persons .present. at this, which' was ,called a County ' Meeting, and the majority of those were of-a , certain description, as regarded politics, very different from the great majority of the county. Sir R. HERON did not know from whom the Hon. Member had his information, but he would advise him, whoever they were, not to place any reliance on them again. He could assure the Hon. Gentleman that at no Meeting which had taken place in the county of Lincoln for the last 30 years, had he seen a Meeting more respectable or more numerously at tended. As to Radicals,, he did not believe there were 20 Radicals present (Hear.) For when the Ra dical amendment was proposed, not 20. hands were held up for it. He was surprised to hear the Hon. Member say, that there was not a majority of the Meeting in favour of Reform. If it was not so, and if the majority of the county were not in. favour of Reform, why did not those who were against it at tend this Meeting, and oppose the Petition? Indeed he was not certain they did not; for, on looking into the Reading-room, he saw collected there a larger collection of big-wigs, shovel , hats, and short petti coats (laughter)--than he had ever seen assembled on any other occasion, except, indeed, a visitation din ner (general laughter.) Mr. CHAPLIN said, he was convinced, not withstanding what the Honourable Baronet had said, that there were not, of all descriptions, one thousand persons assembled at this Meeting. Colonel JOHNSON avowed himself a Radical, however unpalatable the term might be in that House. He had seconded the Amendment of Major Cart wright, and was satisfied that the great majority of the people of England, as well as of the county of Lincoln, were in favour of Reform.—The Petition was then brought up and read. Mr. A. SMITH said, he must repeat his belief as to the character of this Meeting. On the day of the Meeting, the streets were paraded by the Radicals. There never was a greater jirrce than this Meeting presented.—The Petition was ordered to be printed. Lord MILTON said, he now had to present to the House a similar Petition from the County which he had the honoueto represent. He assured his Hon. Friend opposite (Mr. A. Smith), that had he been present at the Meeting at which this Petition was car ried, he would not have termed it a farce. Whether he considered the numbers present, the rank and cha racter of many,. and the orderly conduct of all, it was far, indeed, from having any resemblance to a farce (Mar, hear). The Petition, he might assert, was unanimously carried, and the persons assembled were at least ten times as numerous as at Lincoln.—Gene rally it might be stated, that at least among the mid dling and inferior classes, great uniformity of opinion prevailed upon this question. He would observe in the outset, that when 16 years ago a contest took place for the county, every part of Yorkshire, nay, every corner of the Metropolis, was ransacked for .voters, and 23,070 came to the poll. To this Petition no less than 17,083 names were affixed—at the lowest computation forming two-thirds of the freeholders of Yorkshire. The utmost pains had been' taken to ex clude the names of persons who were not bona fide freeholders, and he did not believe, having gone over the whole of them, that there were fifty to which an exception could be reasonably made.- 1 One or two had signed as trustees, a few more as freeholders of the town and county of Hull, and of the town and county of York, who ought properly not to have- been.included, and he believed that the, names of five females would be found upon the Pe tition Strictly, perhaps, they were out of their place, although, according to the plan of Reform of Major Cartwright, they would be entitled to vote. With regard to the opinions of the Petitioners, he entirely concurred in them. He had, indeed, formerly, once ' ' or twice, voted against Reform, but the conduct of l the House of Commons had converted him to the persuasion that a Reform was absolutely necessary— (Hear, hear).—ln this conversion he was not sin grilar : the same change had taken place in the opi nions of a man of most calm and sober judgment— the Hon. Member for Thetford (Mr. R. Colborne). The same remark would apply to the Noble Member for Salisbury (Lord Folkstone), a man of inflexible political• integrity, though in some of his notions eccentric. A similar conversion had occurred in the case of an Hon. and Noble relation, one of the Mem bers for the county of Nottingham (Lord W.Bentinck). The Petitioners did not point out any particular' course with respect to Reform upon which they wished the House to proceed; and he (Lord Milton) approved of their silence upon that head. The House would do well to attend to opinions which were backed by the authority of more than 17,000 names —that list embodying, independent of respectable Ifreeholders, absolutely 'a majority of the aristocratic interest of the County of York. It had been too much the custom to treat the people of England as incapa ble of truly appreciating the present state of Parlia mentary Representation. He thought that the people were well capable of distinguishing between that conduct which was regulated by a constitutional regard to their interest, and that which proceeded upon no other principle than a uniform submission to the pleasure of the Crown. The Noble Lord, after declaring as his fixed . opinion, that the House had long ceased to do its duty faithfully as a Represen tative of the Commons of England, sat down by moving that the Petition should be brought up. Mr. STUART WORTLEY, although he willingly bore testimony to the excellent order of the Yorkshire Meeting, and to the high respectability of the names affixed to the Petition, yet dissented entirely from the opinions which that Petition expreised. Mr. RIDLEY COLBORNE thought that the mo dern practice of publishing Parliamentary Debates, by subjecting public men to the influence of public opinion, had done much towards a practical reform in the House of Commons. The Petition was then brotight up and read. It was 380 feet in length ; and the unrolling it (to read) occupied the Clerk of the House seven minutes. Mr. SYKES (on the motion for printing) reminded the House that the signatures to the Petition had been fairly and openly obtained, at a time when, from the general cheapness of provisions, there was little in citement to temporary discontent among the People. Mr. CHALONER opposed the Petition and the principle of Parliamentary Reform. generally.—The Petition was then ordered to be printed. Lord STANLEY presented a Petition from the Chamber of Commerce, Manchester, praying that the Urion Duties 'Vl:lit not be repcakd.—Read and ordered to be panted. THE LATE NIGOCIATICNI Mr. CANNING moved that an sewed to his Majesty for the prods Papers relative to the late negociatini Mr. WARRE wished to know Treaty entered into at Verona bets Powers, by which they agreed to France arAinst Spain ? Mr. CANNING said, that to his to the best of his belief, no such treat cf by the Hon. Gentleman had been Whether any obligation had been c might be urged as equivalent to a tre; question; but no such treaty, to hi! belief, had been signed. Neither w any of the cases in the contemplati ' had been promised to France, bad a! SLAVE TRADE. fr Lord PALNIERSTON presented the University of Cambridge, prayint would be pleased to adopt such meAsi the Slave Trade, as would prevent portation of Slaves into our Colonies rate as far as possible the situation of slavery continued to exist. Mr. BROUGHAM was happy tIL of Cambridge had advocated the pi mnnity and justice, and had no dot ' would have that weight due to the illustrious a body. Mr. BERNAL, as a Member of thi joked at this manifestation of its opi ject of the Slave Trade. The Petition was then read and 1; Mr. CANNING moved that the House, jburn to Thursday.—Motion agreed to. ROMAN CATHOLICS.' General ARCHDALL presented the inhabitants of Inniskillen, against cessions to the Catholics. Colonel TRENCH said, he held number of affidavits, to estalslish tl had stated on a preceding night, th of the Catholic priesthood frequently i the Dublin Election ; that they were and harangued the people; and that the Election they paraded the streen all those who did not vote according ticms, eternal damnation—(Hear, Some of the Priests can ied their part as even to threaten persons with c: whilst at the altar on their knees. Mr. S. RICE would put the House one fact, which would considerably of the Hon. Member's statement. Dublin had not long since been present election, which contained the same ; the result was that the petitioners ' into the proper recognizances, and abandoned (Cheers.) He would no , in reference to a delusion which h: respecting the late division on the qt lic claims. It had been stated to be tholic Claims; whereas some of tip the Catholics were to be found " The enemies of the Catholics were rr in the minority upon that question. Colonel WHITE said, he had beep diffidence alone from contradicting ." the Petition presented a few nights nourable Member for Somersetsli. Lethbridge). Those allegations he equivocally declared to be groundless denied that the Catholic clergy had ' the hustings, or had in, any other any improper interference in the elect county. His opponent was in the and had himself, as well as hii fami the Catholics—(Hear, hear).—He (CI in favour of Catholic Emancipation, was enough to attach the Catholics (Hear, hear, hear!)—Since the Petitit he had been in Ireland, and had Lear' tholic Priest had made any harangt tings. As to the menace of excommt one who knew Ireland must know th; had not the power of spiritual ezcomt sides, such a threat would have been was sure of their support without an , —(Hear, and laughter).—Nobody we by such allegations except those who, be undeceived—(Hear, hear). Mr. C. H. HUTCHINSON contendeek it was improper that the clergy of L permitted to interfere in elections, yet, to England and Wales, and saw the and indefatigable exertions of the Prat in elections, he thought that they mil the excuse of example—(Cheers). Mr. V. FITZGERALD objected prolongation of the discussion. Mr. GRATTAN said, that he knew tionable authority, that the Catholic . Troy, had given the niost decided instructions the clergy of the diocese of Dublin not the elkction. Sir T. LETHBRIDGE said, that presented the Petition of Sir Harcourt not pledged himself for the truth of allegations. There was; however, prayer worthy of the notice of the House, where he requested to be called to House, and to be heard in support of , Sir J. NEWPORT said, that the allegations Pitition of Sir Harcourt Lees were precis' which had been embodied in the Dub' . had been afterwards abandoned. ' Mr. G. R. DAWSON said that he toes from his relatives, who had taken Dublin election, and whose efforts pletely paralyzed by the interference not fair, manly, and honourable. interference, interference the most undue and cc, le• would not say that they had threatened cation at the altar, but they had used quite as indefensible. The Dublin been afraid to push their allegations cause the witnesses, who were all 1 / 4 afraid of the peitalties which the clergy' against them. Colonel WHITE, in explanation, all the question was, which assertion of the lion. Member for Cad:bridge (I or hi.; ? "He asserts one thing, positc.. Li t him bring his proofs; I 2 , 17. M A ICCI N :aid, that it was I t ,lit 4 ~ i' ia a I ptaeNetcljuitssAag. k s t o l aaxrsi one eoLi c:aYf l (ziesnitc:d eg ulyaitilaayeoitonlahptidriceb°lnt,toil mdewsi a la. eitr r seaef i d ' up d i . 'te u t lt:t)ci no caht.. t lceailj:ta o all ega t i o ns ttvieav) aware oadn'elei a ndu u l assel te nesr a b e l a not ha noer t ni 1 i es i nof:c which . na t i e t ciNP '4i i 1 k .:Itt i l hk. why . 16 si na i e l 0 1 ttieraocan t IC Cambridge, til aotloubSlhnthr.lie yf il l i eo r aGTd : :cIeCIM fie r iSt o tdtni:he c ausee House birifgeonnePrpetodCnrtesPahPjflriin°t,°a.allvYeicririrdl. PetiteMbimtniewoilo u l d iuusv i t bf t absdr i ii thei but : t on . s. the -. 4 w i t h r egard sur e s aser e g i 3 el a ? f ir° ! le' . . ~ .:i. log lieftt the h v a f t ailojobeoortanipswonea,deutf4tbsotae to ae h l in yb sltdm e thle a l 'i pi dteo n o e s h r a h n d i te : any furthe r ( • e s afforaled; th called on th 1 Dawson) ha tube their Pet;; 1 ,-.' the witnesse le character of . their Priests no evidence :he University, . mot call the zinion on the (Hear). Thi davits, stati laid on the tat& ' Clergy had I t s i t le an f y ac ia t r:h i e l r ic c h o li o 1 e, at Iti titiwg,(l o fore an Elect .- . to be regard I a Petition from • were expose, penal ties of Lhae a great man the makers c a The House i d il his bandi t i the Hon. Me y interfered duris i eon the hosting had shrunk f it the night bef ' z.o opportuni having t ell: d ie : g e r ii t la o :de t I j i ts, denouncing Colonel T gto their sugg reason why and laeg/aer artizanship so f . se in possessioon( qualify the font - against the C A petition hoe managh ; Ire tsented againsethe to allegation, aid county, whic s had not entente table, and to venish, and I the charge WV CONDUCT OF l ow say somethizij had gone abrox . Sir IRAN luestion of Catho . • se against the Ce• ' L: - 4 ,,, ; ( 1 , g mi t he best friends ch rner night, re in that majoritr. l .. su.nice of the N.; ho heard hi rather to be found • occasions hos , .. to touch on a been prevented 5, the misfortnn the ailegatioils.' peculiar di tEc since by the 11- interest could tire (Sir .., tated feeling ; to now most tt , to witness this ess and false. H out some allei d been present , to ameliot ate ray been guilty .. interwoven sit lection for Debi : Empire. It 1 e Orange interest, was that of a lily, voted agaion . bleaking out, 3 010 nel White)" , * teal hostility. n, and that aloe,. consideration sto his support— party in Irela ion was presented of palliation,. earnt that noel- get the peace ;ue from Melon. person who ss munication, evol oblivion over that a Clergymms But he loo • ke rnmunication; I* be appreltensi :en useless, as be alarm of an it any such resoarce the dread of wou ld b e deceived whistle in the iao did not wish to (Hear). None from which 11 tided, that though wiry into the Ireland should be the subject w t, alien belnoked last under the the vast inltaimoi, able Member Protestant clovr uitlz an eloqt (gilt plead alea II to the House, beneficial effe el to any further riety of topics of passing 01 mew from UV& guage of par : ArcbbishoPe Dr. tiality on one Instructions to all was regarded ) n r o ec t i t se o ly in . terk: asl io io t n z fo d ri i ma n i g atip p one a r r: at when be 114 and the High art L ees , be lad port the moti tf the Petiticell i i mash po t :o l: : l in t rei,r : louse, which sole olnmon—r or , ) the bar of the t p pe e in r p o eud f i fi : li ra n it of his assertiour P er ly exercise the Right Hot i ec.i c ab et rfehhkenp o iniaeoacis th dirfdt juePliveitr e niblee:::ti p bnersei r u:c oof pledbristsia hots hirnitJ .niehiondeseeofitgouncdionzhttorntandeh:dit:fatitsilthatsoheuttii Genera med eicommos i, _tom e , least objection used other onsio . . were f obstructe I Cdeafth y ol hi j.pweg_ justice, idedly of opi n was true, ° IP . : ''CC (Colonel Trench ) ' against t he tout ,e wh ly u b i a d, d deno tha . t nocei det e l n ....e. f rili r en ro rsa ati i thonwaot;ul ( , I assert the if 't en ffiCio 1 as not quite glir •