Star. — London, England, 1823-12-19 00:00:00

NAVAL INTELLIGENCE. This Th ri norty, Hoemer, lest three anchors and cables on Wed imga, n ight, in Yarmouth Roods, and afterwards sunk on the beach. Th e Honourable Companys ship General Harris, commended by : . 0 w its' s'', drove from her moorings, at Northßeet, last night, at eight o'clock, on the Essex side of the river. At eleven o'clock. r as. the wind blew very hard, but she lay in the Mud, and wok no water ; it was expected she would float again with the tide. The Juha has arrived in London front Gibraltar, having on board ai Downe rs, the Spanish Admiral Vaults and his family. tbe CaseLrax revenue cruiser, Lieutenant Gann olio, has seized, off emoteen casks of foreign spirits. - T he Fro' arrived at Callao on the 29th of July, from England, and a wai ts 51.saotis took the command. The Ex-Director of f , mo r al O'Hutotes, and family, came passengers in her, from valrrs i t io, The Fix has relieved the Buns=, which ship is cow ing home. Lieutenant NIA:IIrIZLD is appointed to the Ammo., vice Wane promoted. w e g or wisy last a wherry with two men, and Ave tubs of foreign o bits, was seized in Portsmouth harbour. g str aet of a letter dated Cape of Good Hope, September le : Fbe Estimate is arrived here, having sailed from the hlauritius s i c lash ult. where she sett the ARIADNIS, Captain Moomosi, all w en, 31r. Tionstos, Master of the F:setecita, has kilned the i ma ms, vice 34r. JOHNS, invalided. The Eastman had rather se vere weather on her passage, and was struck by a sea, but did nut noire mach damage." Fausourn, Dec. 17.—Wind S.S. W.—Arrived from London, tic j o ke, Wean, for 'Trieste ; and Glory, Score, for Genoa. Ar rived his 3laiesty's brig PARTZIOG; with a Mail from Lisbon in twelve days. Posmsorre, Dec. 19.—Vrind S.W.—We experienced a most tresuodoes gale last night from S.S.E. which commenced about Ste o'clock, and continued with unabated fury until tm, when it so da s * veered round to the Westward and became more mode rate; bring the gale the Helen, from London to Leghorn, drove boas ber anchors, and was obliged to cut away her nuin.mast be fore eke could bring up—ebe is come into harbour to repair. His 3biesty's ship Queen Cu* turns drove from her moorings in the harbour, and got foul of the Brothers, Wn.sos ; carried away her b ows p r i t a nd topmasts, stove in her sides and decks, and did other damage. The whole of the outward-bound, except the above, rode out the gale at the 3lotherbank, all well. The Eliza, of Jersey, laden with iron, from Bristol to this port, drove from her anchors and sunk on Hamilton Bank, at the entrance of the harbour — Crew saved. Mat, Disc. i 9.—Wind W. moderate weather.—Last night it blew a violent gale from S.S. W. the vrteels in the Downs drove, but l we do no. hear any of them have met with any accident. Put back this morning and remain, the George Hibbert, Dayseaut Fortitude, Bennett; Cambridge, Bears& ; Palembang, Sumo,; and Clifton, Sums. i newwwwi Dec. 17.—Wind &W.—Arrived the Royalist, Mu mma; fromMiramichi ; Concord, Asuiroms, from Newfoundland; sod William, Novas , from New York; the latter after being on shore on the Hoyle Bank. CUSTOM-HOUSE, DECEMBER 18. Sums Karma lawaans—The Prince of Waterloo, from Ostend; Europe, and Diadem, from Quebec; Rising Son, and Hakes, from &milk ; Rickard, front Archangel; William Cords, from (dais; Hope, from St. Domingo ; Jane, and Glasser, from Cabana Ex mouth, from Genoa ; Virginia packet. from Virginia ; Hero, and Matilda, from the Cape of Good Hope ; Eleanor, from Boordeaux. Farraaan Oursraane—The Neptune, for New Orleans; Gam Curtis, for Calais ; London packet, for Boston ; Waterford, for Waterford ; and Iris, for Belfast. Cr.saama Oa:wasps— The Sir William Curds, for Calals;- Woodstock, for Jamaica; Caledoola, for Madeira; Nelms, for Hamburgh ; and Duke of Kent, . for Rotterdam. Asa:no—At Hamburg'', the Henry, Jenkins; and Grace, Creer well, front Bahia; Cyclops, Grave, from the Havannah ; Clark, from Rio; Maria Elizabeth, --- from Baltinsore; Mer cado, Sanderion ; &zany, Ber ; and 0114, Frazer, from London. At Messina, Pretty Lase,...—.-; and Henrietta, Bickford, from lA ',rpm)/ At Gibraltar, Hoogley, Lamb, from Liana; Scotia, Dale; wad Swik,Walker, from London; Squid, Warren, from Livr=i Rape, Simon, from Cork; Hoßy, from Newcastle; • rose, Wallis, front Bahia; Prazeres and Triomphe, from Pars ; Kate, Wshj,, from the Havannah ; Emerald, Briggs, from Baltimore ; Martha, Gifford, from New York ; Aurora, Hall, from harm ; Delight, Cunningham, from Virginia ; Blooteequiro, from Charleston • Janvrin, Oresley, from Areibal ; Oak, Penman, ben Newfound land; Maria from Amsterdam; Wallace Elkin, from Flushing.; and darmonie Loots, from Bergen. At Cayenne, Dews Amin , Dugas, from BOurdraux. At Batavia, Nan goy, -- front France. At Charleston, Marmion, Petrie; and Wary Cadserina, Fm., from Liverpool ; Feliciana, Brown, from Gibraltar, and Rio. Knowltng, from Marseilles. In the Delaware, Hess, kl'Kenzie, from St. Übe's. At Savannah, Lady H. Ellice, • gad Georgia, Varnunt. from Liverpool ; also the Eliza Ann, Baird, from the yde. WESTMINSTER COURT OF REQUESTS. cotta-nagm usessrsa-mums, =MINA .•••aNW..-. Cann v; Co aacc.—The plaintiff in this case is a pub lican, and keeps the Swan, in Arundel-street; and it appeared that some time . back; as nothing can be settled in tngland without a dinner, a party of molar three assembled to dine at his house, for-the purpose GE discussing divers bottles of wine, which had been lost by: different Gentlemen of the party in betting. Mt. Corren, tlO defendant, having lost a larger propeedell than some of the others, thought he was-justified its ha. viting five friends to in the discussion ;he did shy and he also gave in their names at the bar, and said something to this effect, that as they were strangers te , Child, he would take care and see the reciuming The calling in and settling of a tavern bill has said to be the saddest moment of a man's life-he this as it may, it seemed that on the morning succeeding' this dinner party, the chairman called at the Swim, and apportioned the whip, as it is- called, to each perant,, at eight shillings per brad, the eating part having bees paid when the cloth was drawn. Mr. Corren bad paid' his own, and for one friend, but objected to pay for the rest; and Mr. Child, who was trot at.all a ehildith sort of person, now claimed gl 19s; 11d. of £2 which he said was due for four of his friends, and for a sing. ing gentleman, who had been brougfit up from Brigko= ton to amuse the company, and whose catches were said to have been excellent, but whose name we could not catch. Mr. Corren was very indignant at all this, and' a great deal of vituperative eloquence passed between the plaintiff and defendant, Corren charging Child with haring taken a seat at the table uninvited, and not only se, but with .having been so fond of his own wine as w . get 6eedi& drunk ; this called up a port adorn" au* raw Childs face, who denied the assertion, and said mom over thtt he toe invited, and war altt drunk t and co prove that he thought Mr. Corren was in the latter el. tuation, dieted to bet him a guinea, in open Court, that • be did not recollect who the chairman was. This was ista good a joke, that Corren laughed at it, or rather be " grinned horribly a ghastly smile." He now ashoil Child why he had not summbited the Gentlenien, f - whim he was now called upon to pay, themselves? but he was told by the Court, that independently of what he had done at the bar, in giving their names, all *ties at a dinner of this sort, were each legally liable Mier the 'whole amount, as well as for their individual alarm Mr. Corren seemed rather astonished at this dictate; but finding the law against him, he said he taould, take a week to pay it, in, that, by so doin g , be might have an order, and be so enabled tee proceed against those who had gone off scot fire. The Com missioners, in the sequel, deducted from the amount the eight shillings for the warbling gentleman's portion 'the charge, thinking probably that Cotren would have enough of a good t king as it was, and be suffi ciently initructed and warned, by paying £1 12s. (which they awarded), bow he gave Gentlemen s namei in at a tavern bar again, with any remark amountin to a Pi okilfie to Fry. . LAW INTELLICIENCEs • 'COURT OF KING'S Bat/CH, DECEMBER "rd. • -% PAYING BILLS BY CHlN lily...4Ni= V. ViNDOSOI.A. :.The SoLicrron-Gassam. stated this case fur the plaintiffs, 'Messrs. Smith, Payne, and Smith. It was an action to recover 3501. with interevt, upon a bill of. exchange. The defendants were merchants in Briitnl, under the firm of Messrs. Vindosola and Co. The bill had been drawn at Madrid upon the'clefendants ' • 'and after various indo rs em en t s i n Spain, England, and Scot land, had found its way to the ho use. of the plaintiffs. It was sent to the defendants to be accepted. It was ac cepted, and made payable at Mt. Pomar6's, No. 5, Freeman's-court. When it became due, a check of Mr. Pomaris's was presented, and the bill taken up. When the check was presented at the clearing-house it was dis honoured, and Mr. Pomaris had absconded. The third bill was produced in Court with a great number of endorsements, and it appeared that the course of business in such cases of triplicate foreign bills, was to have the first bill accepted, the second endorsed and negotiated, and to have the third kept, with all endorse menu, to be produced in case of necessity. A number of witnesses were called to prove the formalities of the case. Mr. MARRYATT admitted, in his address to the Jury, that the only question was, who was to bear this loss ? lie contended that the plaintiffs having presented the bill in the morning without having received money, ought not to have received the check near four o'clock. Their negligence ought to impose upon them this loss. The LORD Cnia JUSTIcE said he should be sorry to say anything which would cast a doubt upon the pro, priety and security of such a common and convenient practice as that of receiving checks in satisfaction of bills of eschange.---Verdict for the plaintiff-3661. • USURY.—WRIGHT V. LANG. This was a penal action brought by the Assignees of Golding, a bankrupt, against the defendant, to recover 9001. being three times 3001. alleged to have been lent to Golding on a usurious contract. In order to support this action and recover the penalties, it was necessary to prove the taking of usurious interest. The declaration alleged that a corrupt agreement was made between Golding and Laing, and that the sum of 3001. was lent for siz months, for the forbearance of which the de fendant took 15 per cent. per annum, viz. 221. 10s. The borrower also undertook to repay the 3001: by ac cepting three bills of exchange. Golding was called to support the plaintiff's case. It appeared that the bankrupt had dealings with the de fendant, and previous to his bankruptcy he purchased hops of him upon credit. Before April, 1821, he ap plied to him for a loan of 3001. saying he would pay handsome interest. The defendant asked what it was? Golding said, ten per cent. Mr. Laing objected to that, and observed that his money was worth twenty per cent. He was building in the Commercial-road, and cash to him bore that interest. There was no loan on that oc casion; but subsequently, the subject was renewed, and defendant said the lowest be would take would be 15 per cent. Golding finally agreed to those terms, and re ceived a cheque for 3001. upon the defendant's banker's, Messrs. Masterman and Co. He accepted in return three bills of exchange, amounting to 3221. 10s. which included principal and interest. The bills were paid, and when Golding became bankrupt, the assignees, discovering the transaction, brought the present action. Mr. Sciaterr addressed the Jury for the defendant, and complained that the books of the bankrupt had not been produced. He endeavouted to chew, by nice cal culation of interest, and the expenses fairly incident to the transaction, that the defendant had taken no more than he was legally entitled to. ' The Loan CUM/ Juavca cautioned the Jury to be satisfied the corrupt contract had been completed.before the*/ gave a verdict which must iallict penalties to so large an amount. If they believed excessive interest hid been taken their verdict must be for the plaintiff. The Jury retired from the box, and on their return to • Court found a verdict for the plaintiffz—Damages 9001. AIM AND CO. v. WILY AND CO. .This was an action of trovir, to recover a policy of insurance, alleged to be the property of the plaintiffs, and conyeried by the defendants to their own-use. The polies are merchants of the highest character, and-the action was brought to try a b4re question, as to which lof them bad a right to the policy. The cause bas been already tried, when a verdict was found for the plain.' tiffs; but, on the application of the defendants, a new trial was ranted. -• The policy in question was erected by Messrs. Reid and Co. as the agents .of a Mr. Trelessin, on the ship Isis. As Mr. Trelessin was largely insiebted to them, they retained the policy in their own hands, as a secu- , rity for the repayment of their advances. While they thus held it, Mr. Trelessia asked leave to take it, in or der to thew to underwriter t, Who had also insured the vessel, the amountfor which it was insured. They ac cordingly delivered it to him, and it found its way into the bands of Mr. Horace Sally, the brother of one of the defendants. Mr. Horace Solly held it as a security for the debt of Afr.Vashaugliton; who handed it to him ; and the present defendants, having token Mr. Horace badness, and made advances on his behalf, se. calved ibis policy among other sec=iittilttow coo . tended that they had a right to the Mr. &ARUM! COMOSadt that die voimeilfs were clearly entitled to recover. They had a lien on this policy as against Mr. 'freleuin; with that lies they never parted • when they placed the instrument in his hoods, they Only made him their agent for a specific purpose; Mid b e could convey to others no better tile shin be Mandl enjoyed. The right of Reid and Co. bet never been divested, and theref o r e they still had an undoubted right to recover. Mr. Guitars, for the defendants, called Mn. Horam Belly, who stated that be obtained the policy' from Mr. Vanhaughton by pressure, and that he had no know-4 fledge that Reid and Co. had any interest in k; and that %be letter of orders wis handed over with the policy.---; learned Connie! contended, that the instrument ining_obtained by pressure, was legally obtained, and dm Reid and Co. subjecte d themselves to the loss of their claim when they gave up possession of the policy. Mr. SOAaLITT, in reply, argted that it was obvious 11111 f policy was merely given to that Solly, who had *insurance on the seine-vessel, in order that he might .certain that the whole suits insured exceeded the value 41thc cargo, and that be was entitled to a return for • interest.. • short The LORD CMS, JD:MO to the Jury : first, whether the policy Mr. Horace Solly its a pledge? secondly , Solly knew that Reid and Co. had • Amateur ? thirdly, whether the **need money on the security of - In repry to these questions, t' policy was not deliveiesl to- Mr. , owl ;Abet Mr. Itorade Sully did kouet of the Co e( Reid and Ce..and that the defendants bad made no edvatices on the credit of the ;adul t - Th ey then, under the direction of die_Lord Chief Josticey.folad a verdict fr the plaintiff, with a shilling Olives, the polity to r o e be returned, subject to the question of law, Wooly can .be raised, on this finding. ' ' COURT OF COMMON ?LEAS, nscsinfitt is. . • • BOAS'S S. JACKSON. . Mr. Serjeant Pula., for the plaintiff; stated that this ' was an action on a Policy. of Insurance effected upon the ship Pilot by the plaintiff with the defendant, who is the recognized representative of the Pacific Associ• atiens. The sum insured was 15001. for which the plain. 'tiff paid the defendant a premium of 121. 12s. percent. The policy bole date April 1, 1818, but aas to take effect from 12 o'clock at night of the 14th of February; in the same year, and to continue in force for one year, that is to say, until twelve o'clock at night of the 15th of February, 1819. The case had been once before tried, ana a verdict had for the plaintiff, out the Court ut •Common Pleas had granted a new trial. The points to be now ascertained were, whether the ship in question was and had been in a seaworthy and sound state on the said 15th of February, 1818, arid whether the loss ' Maimed was a fair average loss beyond the consequence of the usual wear and tear of a vessel on an India voyage? Mr. Serjeant VAUGHA N previous to calling the wit nessess for the defendant, aidressed the Jury. The Jury without leaving the box found a verdict ' for the plaintiff—Damages £l,soo,subject to a reference ' to Mr. Glenny to ascertain the amount of the average. INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT, DECEMBER ss. ' Edward Plait:ad was opposed by Mr. HKATU for a ' creditor named James Moore. It appeared that the in solvent had been a coal and timber-merchant, at Croy don, and was confined to the King's Bench Prison from April, 1822, to the following November. There were three detainers against him, amounting to I,looi. In order to obtain his discharge, be gave an acceptance for SOL to a person named Sandom, to be lodged with a Mr. Green as a security, and not to be negotiated unless the discharge could be accomplished. While this bit was running on, Sandom obtained different sums of money, amounting to 301. under.various pretences, and defrauded the insolvent; for which he (insolvent) in- 1 dicted him at the last Easter Newington Sessions, when he was convicted and sentenced to seven years' trans portation. He had passed the bill to the present op. posing creditor, who stated that he gave clothes for it. In consequence of the insolvent's wife having repre sented to his creditors the conduct observed towards him by Sandom. they sent his discharge to the prison, and he was liberated ; but was afterwards arrested by Mr. Moore for the SOL A professional Gentleman named Duncombe, stated some circumstances respecting Mr. Moore, but was cautioned by the Court to take care how he reflected upon the character of that individual. Mr. HIATR contended that the insolvent bad been ancillary to the fraud practised by Sandom. The COURT observed that there were some services incomplete, and therefore the case- should stand over for the present. They intimated their intention, when the insolvent was next brought up, not to allow his dia. charge to take place for some time longer, for which they would then assign theif masons. Samuel Lawrence, who was brought up on a former day, wis opposed by A b raham Henry in person. He Stated that he had carried on business as a jeweller at Bath, and occasionally dealt in soft goods. In the mid. die of last year, he was obliged, in consequence of an Etchequer process issuing against him, to apply to his creditors, who were principally cf his own (the Jewish) persuasion, for indulgence, and in most instaaces with 6accem. n the following October, hi ruchased 1814 WCS 01 of goods of Mr . Henry, for which he gave hies two bills, which were punctually paid. In the month of February in the present par, he made another parches* of Mr. Henry, of a quantity of bead-purses and musical boxes, on which occasion he told him be had got over his Exchequer difficulties, but be denied having repre sented that he had overcome all his other embarrass ments, or that he said he was then doing well.. 1k pledged a quantity of goods, of which he sold the du; iplicates to various persons, except a few which be had given to his father to dispose of, as be was. in distress: He denied having ever played at games of chance, eio; cept for a cup of coffee, or that he was playing at .a 'game of hazard called lansquenet, at the Black Lion, Russell -court, Drury-lane, at the time of the Passover, in April last. ' - ' Mr. Henry, whd was also a Jew, having finished his examination of the insolvent, intimated that he would contradict his statement, and requested to be swam--; The oath was accordingly administered to him; but in kissing the Old Testament, he omitted plating his hat on his head, contrary to the practice usually observed by the Jews. Mr. Coosa, Counsel for the insolvent, asked Mr. enry why he had departed from the ordinary mode of swearing amongst individuals of his , persuasion, in emitting to put on his hat? _ . .. Mr. Henry.—lt is customary with SIN of my per- Suasion to take an oath with their heads uncovesed. , The Cunt Commusionsa said, he had never seen an ipstance of it in a Court of Justice in hislife before. Mr. Henry said, that he wished to address the Dial airs with as much reverence as he would a fellow ereature.—Strong marks of disapprobation were here evinced - by several Jews, of whom there was a coed derable number present. I • The witness added, that in Synagogue, or when am ged at private devotion, he always addressed the Aso IGHTT with' his hat on; but it was . custosnary with him, and with others, to take an oath , as be had li ef Stated, with his head uncovered. He then . p. With his statement, in which he swore that the idcolo when he made the last purchase of hish.represeateci that be had got over all his difficulties, and was &jag-well. Mr. Comte, in his'address to the Court, observed upon ;be inconsistency of the opposing creditor's conscien tious scruples, which led him, when offering prayers to Derry, to keep his head covered,. and to uncover at when calling upon him to attest the' truth of his state- Pent. This deviation from the constant practice of his 1 brethren would induce the Court to recesve hi; testl 'stony with caution. In point of fact, nothing was made out against the insolvent, except that be gave a few du plicates .to his father ; and at the time he had done ..s. it was. not probable that he contemplated the pre that soelb4rialiirbad .4 insolvent as eallitaispon fraud.; bet they thoegbt it, -• might to afford Owen& --- l• the accefacy.of: his , They the/trate re •i . montlib. . , . . VANED SESSeeiik tilest„ porter at the en and 7—d° Old Blaine, Wiliam, was indicted for twits efiefrauded Mr. Horn, of• No. 33, in the Straad m s - .-, _ 4411. Grey. who resides at No. 65.. Stleatitt., 41004 that a parcel directed to Mr. Hoin was .. .delivered toJiim on the Dedi of October, by-the prisoner, who demanded and received the sum of es. 6d. for carriage and porters 4 that de: age. The ticket produced by the prisoner had mand upon it, but was not in Court. Mr. Horn deposed, that he had always previousll paid Is. Bd. for the carriage and porterage of a parcel from the same pike; he complained at 'the inn, and learned from the book.teeper that the charge was an int , pobitidn. Mr. Halls , 6f 13uw-street, insisted upon the pro. secutioo of the pi isouer. I • The clerk of the inn deposed, that he had made out a ticket, charging Is. 81;lestd that the ticket shewn to him by Mr. Horn wits Alk* writing of. the prisoner, and an aver-charge, as star 'before ; witness had not the false ticket; prisoner paid in at the office only ls.Bd. 1 he Juiy immediately found the prisoner Guilty. The CHAIRMAN, in passing sentence, told the prisoner that he had been guilty of an offence of a very deep dye —one that was very easily committed, acid from the commission of which theinitilic tinily and hourly suffered. The sentence upon the prisoner tai imprisonment and hard labour In the House of Convoke for three months. A woman named Mitchell. and a man named Hoskins, who is an aoctioneer; re-iding near Burton -crescent, were put to the Isar, on an indictment charging them with laving violently a,saulted Elizabeth Ho kips, the wife of the male prisoner. The unfortunate prosecutrix, who was repreiented as subject to periodical kit' cif insanity by the opposite party, stated, certainly in rather an incoherent manner, that she had been separated for some time from her hus band, who lived with the female prisoner; that upon going to his house for her allowance, she met with the most barbarous treatment ; that the female prisoner struck her a violent blow, and dashed her against the pavement; and that she was covered with blood'by the violence used towards her. The CHAIRMAN told the proseeutrix that she had not as yet shewn that her husband had been concerned. She replied that she did not wish to hurt het husbaed. Mr. ANDRRWS, fbr the defendants, said that Mr. Hos kins came to the Court as a witness far Miss Mitchell, and had no idea that he was included in the indictment (Mr. Hoskins laughed.) Smith, the watch-house-keeper of the parish, stated that he found the prosecuttix near her husband's door, almost smothered in her own blood. He raised her up, and she pointed out the female prisoner as the person who had abused her. The husband told witness that Miss Mitchell had done it, and that he had ordered her to do it. Mr. ANDREWS spoke very indignantly to the last witness. He described Mr. Hoskins as a proper man, his wife as a person labouring under infirmity of mind, which caused the separation between them, and be re gretted that any minister of the law should dare to re present what was grossly false. If the Jury, as they must do at once, acquitted Mr. Hoskins, that Gentle- man would go into the box, nod sheir that this Smith had most grossly violated the truth. Go into the box, Mr. Hoskins," added Mr. Andrews. The CH) IRMAN.—What ! will you call a defendant from the bar, before the Jury have di.posed of him ? Gentlemen, if you do not- think Mr. Hoskins guilty, acquit him at once? The Jury consulted for some time, and said they wished to hear further evidence before they decided.— There being no person in Court who witnessed the istault,they pronounced Mr. Hoskins Not Guilty. Hoskins then, at the desire or Mr. ANDRRWS, weht into the witness-box, and began to make a violent speech. Mr. ANDREWS checked him, and asked whether there was a word of truth in what Smith had said? Hoskins reviled his wife and Smith; but to the asto nishment of the Court, and Jury, he acknowledged that Smith bad spoken the truth, and that he (Hoskins) had directed Mitchell to do ohat she had done to his were. The CHAIRMAN expressed his regret to the Jury that he had been so precipitate in advising an acquittal of the husband, who really deserved punishment, and was a party to a most scandalous and atrocious assault. • Here Hoskins used some insolent language to the Chairman, upon which Mr. ANDRIEWU threatesed to throw up his .brief. This had no effect en Hoskins, who said that he would act in the same monster agaia. Mr. Autinews.-Did you say to Sraids that you de sired the female co push yourwite out? • Hoskins.—To besure I did, and she slid push hem p¢ : CHAimeAR.--What had you to do with this wouna at the bar? Hoskins.—l protect her; for my lodgings mose ,fte , taken care of. • The CHAtamAN.—Gentlemen of the Jury, I aun t ie - cited ashamed. at having followed the hint of Counted, allowed this man to escape ; but I thought that the beelebaii would be a sort of mediator, .in who . = the .treekt Might confide. But be has proved, as yoo•per 4stiee, a very different soft of.person. The poor woman 'bilis been represented au Matt. . If uses not. such con. as thicis indeed enough -to' 'Rake her mad. All been.said by Smith GO sbeimilbaad prove the 'tirelbJef •the charge. • . ;_ i • Miss Mitchell was then found Golly, and, tile CHAIR MAN told her, that as Mr. Hoskins was her protector, be would, no doubt, extend his protection to her in her present condition. Me this fined her £lO, with liberty to speak to the prosecute*. . . Saturday last, a little of &onham, Suffolk, whirl stuck . in his throat, be obtained, he expired. The eighteen women weeks 'since, by an Bench, for rescuing Preventive .Service, . bridge, were all libecii unmarried, on their own on the recognizmltei peace foi one ear. CORN glictrAitot 'I ARZAANk PVC. Vitrf_ r, CORN The arrivaii St this week tei-.--Whese VKIIII. Roby ga o l= 74100, Me Oita 5311 "nom r Flour 1,1 sadis. Trsditis spin bridi t*siris 104 °a e rial. lush." 110 Su* 1 0 4 M Monday's leststim. sells w ee, is **odors teems. . sad IPess have ski really sale, Sas* looted* Illisaft_ 1 bores, swil Mir totilhtsin their orlesorsediereetlfwifaWiells , l surrOrtimrp• mkgasr, scums ae. - . 9.,_ Thismaaeolees Mesas less as fa el Ones se ea Morfiliff.,/41. /mansbar of ikon which, staiwohl Istst sarlsiviy_ otms• brought * sae this 11111111 rhog, WI die lies - sann y s nese iiiesry' g st mar . 41.,00111PV111. • Isossight Sias alai alit:trim • Car .—. :. tr: rso 'molts tßiesAvereskimeallib• 35.114 , 11.0& aalll/11111"11 411 AMISL Vflie*S.44, lo /P4 # 1 1 1 ..4`.1 - .:,es N 1 ^ • 4 likettee giestiOns of fact seat insolvency. how elenfecy was delivered to The Cotter did not cnoislder t tcondly, whether Horacq been estUbliabed against **ins* had any claim on the-111i thrmoo Wasewallear for frawli e defendants had ester WI hosveleurose in which they ought o f t h e policy p: addetitesol:tleue to it Into the•Jery feared, thatt)ie ' A rateissiini - istppitieg Ms property. Mr. Horaoe Sony as a: minded lifiri for four Cikudar moo ttle boy, thy 'sotto( Mr. *, k, accidentally swallowed .* %PO throat, and before issistasectosa red. . . nen cornmittatpssoo J • order. &pia ,Goitri cif. a saingglet . trio an Oteefek 'in in the netalibosishood of laisgi. cited on plata* last; lisiolittlpesio, own teciinizatees, and *rads es off' sthelrlatsbands, to beep - the ..• ... • .