Star. — London, England, 1821-06-04 00:00:00

... LAW INTELLIGENCE. CHANCERY COURT.• SeALs AND PlllllOlll =MIR TYR LORD CRIARCELLOR, APT= EASTER AND SITCOM TRINITT Teax, 1821. Thursday - - - --June 7th - - First SeaL Tt.esday - Second Seal. Wednesday 4oth Petitions. Thursday - SRALI AND PETLTIONI RIZORR TUC VaCt-CHASICZALOR, EASTER Am BITOIR TRINITY TRIM, 1821. ' First Seal - - - Thursday - - - June 7th - - - Motions. Second Seal . Tuesday - - Motions. Wednesday - - - 90th - Thursday 21 - - `7'4412. ♦rrss COURT OF KING'S SENOR, JUNE 2. UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. This was a Rule Nisi obtained by Mr. BROUGHAM, frl- prohibiting proceedings in the UnitersittCourt of Oxford, against an individual of the norm of Speed man: the Rule also went to rescind an order made by the -ame Court against the defendant. The circumstances appeared to be these : Mr.Speed man, a respectable tailor of Oxford, had claims in the way of his trade against a Member of Brazennose Col lege ; and. for garments sold and delivered, brought his action in the Court of King's Bench, Westminster. The Authorities of Oxford objected to Mr. Speed man's conduct. They contended, that debts arising in Oxford, and recoverable against resident Members of the University, could be recovered only in the Vice-Chancellor's Court ; and they cited Mr. Speed man before the local Jurisdiction, to-answer the irre gularity of which be had been guilty. Bold is the man (and bolder far the tailor) who in Oxford shall resist the mandate of authority! Strong in imagined right, Mr. Speedman refused obedience to the sum mons of the Vice-Chancellor; but early retribution waited on his contumacy :—judgment of discominu nication passed by default against the offender; pro mulgation followed upon the heels of sentence; and speedy notices on the walls of every College, forbad each member or resident of the University to deal or hold intercourse with so refractory a schneideH— These sctaps of paper, bearing the seal of power, • operated like Obi upon the inhabitants of Oxford. The tailor's trade was in a manner tabooed : coats, lacking coxcombs, crowded up his counter, and' fancy waistcoats faded in his window. At length the churl, grown desperate, sought relief, and prayed a King's Bench Rule to break the spell that bound him! The SOLICITOR-GENERAL shewed cause against Mr. Brougham's Rule. The first part of Mr. Speedman's prayer, the Leatned Counsel said, was past the power of the Court to grant: their Lordships could not pro hibit proceedings, because proceedings were already at an end. The Vice-Chancellor having made his order, wasfunctus ecio, and the suit promoted by the local Jurisdiction against Speedman was altoge ther determined. As it was clear, then, that the ap plicant came too late to take anything by the first , part Of. his motion, so, in answer to the second part, very few observations would be necessary. The se cond part of Mr-Speedrnan's Rule was to rescind the order of the University Court ; the . prayer, in fact, amounted to an appeal. Now, from the local Court there certainly was a power of appeal ; but that ap peal did. not lie to the Court of King's Bench. The appeal from the Vice-Chancellor's Court (of Oxford) lay, first, to the Court of Regent Masters; and after wards to the King, in the person of the Lord Chan cellor ; and, in applying to the Court of King's Bench, Mr. Speedman came to a tribunal which had no ju risdiction to relieve him. Mr- Serjeant BosANQVET followed.on the same side. Mr. BROUGHAM, for the Rule, needed scarcely to contend, that the order of the Vice-Chancellor ope rated solely upon the complainant.- It Was the corn mon course of punishment, indeed, for what the Ox ford Authorities chose to call contempt ; and the in tent was too obvious to call for comment. The Learned Solicitor-General told their Lordships, that prohibition could not now issue because sentence had been pronounced : that doctrine, however, was di - reedy in opposition to the authority of Lord Coke, who, in his second Institute, speaking of complaints by the Ecclesiastical Courts, of prohibitions granted against them after sentence .pronounced, said, " But the Judges of the King's Court answered, that if the Ecclesiastical Courts would assume cognizance of things not within their jurisdiction, prohibition might issue as well after sentence as before." Now the pre sent case, Mr. Brougham continued, was peculiarly strong, inasmuch as judgment had gone against the complainant by default. The SOLICITOR-GZSERAL cited the case of Owen v. Hughes, in which the Court bad decided two points-Ist, that no prohibition could issue after sentence, because the party might have applied in an earlier stage ; and 2d, that there was no differ ence between sentence by default, and sentence after hearing. Mr. BROUGHAM confessed that he had overlooked that care; but contended that, as the Vice-Chan• cellor's order still continued to operate upon the complainant, the proceedings could not be considered as concluded. The Loan Cater JUSTICE.—If we make the rule absolute for prohibiting proceedings, the Vice-Chan. cellor will do nothing, and things will remain ex actly as they are. What you want is a mandamus to him to take down his order. Mr. DENMAN, for the Rule, insisted that the Uni versity was bound to make out its authority even to the letter, when it took so decisive a step as punish ing one of the Kin's subjects for bringing an action in one of the King s Courts. The affidavits before their Lordships did not, he submitted, suf f iciently make out such authority. Mr. Justice BEST thought that in many cases debts accruing within the University would be most pro perly recovered in the University Court. The local Court best understood the charges of the local trades man, and its authority had the means of checking imposition. Mr. DENMAN said that the Judges of the Court of King's Bench had at all times been extremely jealous of claans to local jurisdiction. The LORD CIIIEFJuencE observed, that the ques tion at issue was of considerable importance as re garded the privile i ges of the University of Oxford— privileges, no doubt, granted to the University for wise and wholesome purposes. The argument of Mr. Denman was extremely well put ; and if there was any insufficiency in the admits before the Court, the matter had better stand over until fresh affidavits could be filed. The SOLILITOR GENERAL had no objection to the Rule's being enl 7r Mr. Bitoucue.d great objection: in the mean-, time his client was ruined-by the stoppage of his trade. The COURT, in that case, would hear Mr. Chitty. Mr. CHITTY, for the Rule, argued upon the in sufficiency of the University affidavits. The case seemed to him to be like the case of a conviction for lan offence. Mr. Justice BAYLEY took it to be otherwise.— The University might say to Mr. Speedman, , g We do not interfere with you ; bring your suit where you please ; but if you bring your suit in London, and so draw away our Members, that destroys our system of education, and we will not suffer our Members in future to deal with a person who may so carry them away to answerfor their debts." The LORD CHIEF JUSTICR.—If, after what has been urged to-day, we thought that we ought to make the Rule absolute for prohibition ? we would do so at once, on account of the inconvenience which delay must occasion to the applicant ; but as, if we were to decide now, our decision would be against him, we think it better, with a view to his interest, that we should take time for consideration..—Judg ment deferred. THE KING V. GEORGE EDMONDS. This was the case of libel upon the Magistrates of Birmingham. The defendant entered into his own recognisance in the sum of 4.01. to appear, if called on, for judg ment ; and was told by the Court, that if he con ducted himself properly, he would not be brought up. SHERIFFS COURT, JUNE 2. rIZZET V. BOULTER AND HIS WIVE. This was an action for a breach of promise of marriage. The damages were laid in the declara tion at £l,OOO. Mr. 'ADOLPHUS addressed the Jury on the part of the plaintiff. This was, be said, an action for a breach of promise of marriage, made by the wife of the defendant to the plaintiff Pizzey ; and, when he stated the circumstances to the Jury, lie was sure they would find them of a very remarkable descrip tion. They would find, in the progress of this case, that common faults and coquetry were not confined to persons in the higher stations, or of educated minds, but found their way amongst the lower classes, Ind were as much exercised by an humble servant, is in'aey Play or Romance-writer, where extraordi nary things were usually to be found.• The present action was .brought to recover compensation in damages for one of the severest injuries, with, per haps, one exception, which could be inflicted on al person in the plaintiff's situation of life. The plain tiff was coachman in the family of Mrs. Bowen, at Colnebrook, and the female defendant was also a servant in the same family. At first she entered the service from a Charity School, and it would be seen by her letters that she had benefited by the education she there received. Her letters were not written in what might be called an elegant taste; but they were extremely pretty letters, such as one might see con tained the dictates of an upright mind. On her first entering the service of Mrs. Bowen she received no wages; but, as her industry and diligence made her a better servant, she had fourteen, and then eighteen guineas a-year—a very handsome sum ! At this period the courtship between the parties began. He expressed to her his intentions of marrying her, and fixed all his hopes of happiness upon its being very soon realized. About this time the female defendant, Sarah Burchett (Mrs. Boulter), purchased a sixteenth share of a Lottery ticket, which, unhappily for all partiei, came up a prize of £20,000. Not £20,000 money, but E 20,000 Consols ; one of those tricks and finesses of the day, by which people are made to think they can get more money than they ultimately do. Well, she got as her share LS33. It might be that the defendant would now say to herself, "I have a considerable sum of money—l may alter my inten• tion—perhaps look up to something higher, and all my former arrangements are at an end." If such were the case, her conduct could not be considered as wholly without excuse, though such an apology would not have been becoming. At the time, how ever, of her receiving this money, he took it for granted, indeed he believed the fact to he, that they were mutually attached to each other. On the 12th of May, 1820, Sarah, the defendant, wrote a letter to the plaintiff's mother, the sentiment of which was such as would do credit to A girl in a more elevated rank of life. The letter ran thus : " HARLOW, MAT ie.. " MY DEAR MRS. Piturv.—As John is about to pay you a visit, I have taken the liberty of writing a few lines to Inform you of my good fortune. The last time I was in London I bought a sixteenth in the Lottery. You will be surprised to hear that it came up a twenty thousand, which entitled me to 5C85.1. Airs. Cowell thinks now that I shall soon be married, but I told her that no one should have me for my money, which rather offended her, but I have long intended, and still keep my resolution of never being anybody's daughter but your's, if you will accept me for one. Pray write, if you have time. I hope you are quite well, and that James is better. Your's in haste " BURCHETT." Addressed to Mrs. lizzey. That this was the letter of a frank and honest girl —of such a ,girl as any man might like to make his wife, could n t otposaibly be doubted. The alteration in her attachment .did not speedily take place. At first, when she received the money, she and the plain tiff thought it would - be belf for them to take a pub lic-house, such a sum as she had being considered enough to commence in that line. That such a thought was a very foolish one he sincerely believed; for there was not a butler and a lady's-maid who mar ried, but thought the same thing, and went on in the pursuit till they sot over head and ears in debt, and left the fruits of their early industry in a concern which could scarcely prosper. A public-house, how ever, they now discovered was not fit for them, and she wished the plaintiff to apply to his father to give up a house, with which he complied, and his father 'consented to let him have it. The next letter he should read was dated the 11th of June, and addressed to the plaintiff. " M mazes: Jono.—l am so dull now you are gone, I have not a soul to speak to : it seems five months instead of days since you left me. lam not tired of writing, but my pens cer tainly are, for they get trretchedly bad. They ate gone to din ner, and I shall go and steal a book to pass dull time away.—; Adieu, my love, with wishing you health and happiness, till we meet again. I remain, and ever shall, your's sincerely. (Signature torn off.) " Tell me if you bought the frocks. Harriet's love to all." Addressed to Mr. J. }Um, Burley's Lodp. j After this came another Lauer" . dieted the 20th of • 1. ~ . June ;—a part of it couched in that innocent and playful style which, far from shoving any abatement in her love for the plaintiff, must have corroborated. it beyond measure. There was another portion of it, on which the present action was mainly founded— namely, that in_which she alluded to the efforts made by Mrs. Cowell to induce her to marry the present defendant. This Mrs. Cowell, (observed the Learned Counsel) who had been so often mentioned, was a housekeeper in the house of Mrs. Bowen, and the wretched old woman was the cause of inducing the female defend ant to break the faith which she had so fervently plighted to the plaintiff. Mrs. Cowell seemed anxious to put forward some acquaintance of her own on the female defendant, and that individual was the person' who now stood a conjoint defendant in this action. Boulter, the defendant, lived in the neighbourhood of his present wife ; but, while she was Miss Bur chett, and had no money, he could see no charms about her; but, as soon as the money came, the painter and glazier found a flame begin to warm in his breast, and seemed desirous of uniting his fate to her's, who, before she had the £BOO, lie never once thotriht of making his own for life. So late as the 2.3 d of July the dispositions of the defendant towards the plaintiff were favourable; and he left it to the Jury to imagine what must have been the feelings of his client, when, on the 7th of August, only a fort night after, he received the following, letter: 64 HORTON HOUSIt, AUCCST 7. " Deus JOHN—I have too late found the impropriety of forming an attachment with a person that all my friends had an objection to. lam very sorry you so soon decided upon it ; but I am unworthy of your notice ; and hope, for your own happiness, you will think me so. Ilad things continued as they were, I should most certainly not think of marrying for some, time to come; and I hope you will agree with me in thinking that there are people much more suited to make you happy than me, for I never should think myself so, nor would I ever at tempt it, under such circumstances ; for I should think, sooner or later, I should meet with the treatment I deserved. I re main, your sincere well wisher, "'lo Mr. John Pizzey, "S. BURCIIETT. S. Knipe', Esq. Clay-hill, Epsom, Surrey." This was the conclusion of her correspondence with the plaintiff, with the exception of the following letter, which at once put an end to all those hopes and anticipations her previous conduct had raked in the plaintiff's mind : - - - - - - - - - " As you desire I will write it ; I do it, though really I have nothing to say but what I have already told you ; yet if it is necessary I should add one more instance of folly to what I have already been guilty of, let it be so. " You say it is necessary the Gentleman who has our affairs in hand should see my letters. When they were written they were not intended for public exhibition ; but if you chorise to expose thetn, I must submit, and add one more to the catal ogue of fools. You say, if I will make you a loving wife, you will pardon everything. I ask you, is such a thing possible? No; you may make me ridiculous in the eyes of the world, but you shall not make me vile in my own : no one sees the impropriety of my conduct in a stronger light than I do myself, but I will not add crime to folly by swearing, at the altar, to love a man when I know I cannot ; nor have I so bad an opinion of your principles, as to suppose you would take any woman under such, circumstances.—(No signature.) " To Mr. J. Pizzey,—S. Knipes, Esq. Clay Hill, Epsom." In a short time after the 7th of August, she con ferred her person on the present defendant, totally disregarding what her mistress might think ; and without once attending to any of those other consi derations which she falsely alleged to have altered her intentions. Under such circumstances she left the plaintiff no resource but to bring the present at tion. It was the province of the Jury to consider the amount of the damages to be awarded to a party so deeply injured as the plaintiff. ' The Learned Gentleman here sat down, but rose again almost immediately, and said he had forgotten to state that the wedding ring was ready, • the banns put up and published, and already out-asked—the banns being written in the defendant's own writing. Mr. CRESS WELL, on the part of the defendant, said he should have found it difficult to address them on the present occasion, were i: not for the indignation which he could not but feel at finding them dragged there to waste their valuable time in listening to such a case as this—that they should have been drawn away from their avocations to be insulted and dii gusted by the mockery of such an action. He ad. mitted that the representation of " High Life below Stairs," might be a fit subject for the Stage, and that the billet dons and the love-sick stories of the "Stable and the Still-room," might form an amusing topic in a Farce; but he never could endure the notion, that the important functions of a Jury were to be abused by listening to the sentimental complaints of a stable boy, while rubbing down his master's horses, or clas sically inscribing his mistress's name upon his curry comb. One farthing would, in his humble opinion, be amply sufficient to satisfy any real damages which the plaintiff had sustained. Mr. H ENCH !JAN then proceeded to sum up the facts to the Jury. It was clear, he said, that a promise had been given and broken ; and it was the province of the Jury to say what damages the plaintiff was en titled to for the disappointment he had sustained. The .Tury retired, and in a few minutes returned with their verdict, assessing the damages at £2OO. Sunday week, a quantity of bread was given away at Oswestry Church, as an atonement for defaming the character of a respectable woman residing in that neighbourhood. At Loughborough, which is a very populous town, there has not been a single levy on account of the poor for the last three months. Monday, were landed at Southampton, from Havre de Grace, the remains of KEANE OSBORN, Esq. who died at Geneva, to be conveyed for interment in the family vault at Weston, near Bath. MELANCHOLY OCCURRENCE.—OR Friday (the 25th, ult.) Miss Stratton was drowned in a well, in the garden of Colonel Brotherton, at Portobello, Dublin. She was the youngest daughter of the late John Stratton, Esq. near Dundalk, and Lady Emily Joce lyn, sister to the late Earl of • Roden, and to the present Bishop of Clogher. She had nearly attained the eleventh year of her age; It is not yet three weeks since the death of Mr. Stratton. Lady Emily had gone to remain some time with her only daugh ter now living, Mrs. Brotherton, and while sitting in one of the windows, on the above afternoon, saw her beloved • child, from whom she eipected the chief happiness of her latter years, fall itne a deep draw-well, where she had been amusing - herself.—_ She instantly flew to the spot, and pretvitated le:4' self into the fatal pit after the child. Atilstance was immediately given: - 'from Miss S. the Pita} ,spark was fled for ever.-'..Lady Emily with much difficOlty, was restored ta4ifelaudsupreute misery. • UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. CAMBRIDGE, JUNE I. John Holroyd, Esq. B.A. of Trinity College, era' on Two,. elected a Fellow of Catharine Hall, on the Slurne Wednesday, the following Gentlemen were admitted tsoke undermentioned Degrees: MASTiII OF ARTS • Benjamin Heath Malkin, Fellow of Trinity Callege. SACHILO/L /1 , 4 CIVIL LAW. John Page Wood, of Trinity College. BACHILORS OP' ARTS. Loftus Anthony Cliffe, of St. John's College. George Best, of St. John's College. Charles Stuart Girdlestone, of Caius College. Charles Birch, of Catharine Hall. Thomas Foster, of Emmanuel College. Samuel Charlton, of Sydney Sussex College, George Ludford Harvey, of Sydney Sussex CoDoge. OXFORD, JUNE 2. Yesterday, the Rev. George.llowley, M.A. and Yap" University College, was elected Muter of that Society, Wednesday, the following Gentlemen of Westmins ter s chool were elected Students of Christ Church :—Egerton V esu b le , Vernon,. Robert Hussey, William Legge, James Templ e ) ad, anFrederick Alexander Sterky. Same day, the following Degrees were conferred. ; MASTERS OF AI.IS The Rev. W. Johnson, St. Alban Hall, Grand Corn p q William John Smithwick, Esq. Oriel College, ditto. . Henry Thompson, Esq. Oriel College, ditto. The Rev. Hugh Percy Iltnnett, Worcester College. . The Rev. John Billington, Scholar of University Ca , Charles Richard Pole, of riel College. James Ford, of Oriel College.. • 11ACHELOILS Cr ARTS. • Robert Holberton, of Eacter College. Henry Playsted Jeston, Worcester College. Bradford Glenne Hawkins, Scholar of Pembroke Cofl Thomas }Clyne, St. Edmund HalL John Charmont Girardot, Brasenuose College. George Grey, Oriel Colleg e. F.dward I lay, Student of Christ Church. John Ellis, Jesus College. Same day, the Prize Compositions were adjudged is the ld lowing Gentlemen: CHANCELLOR'S PRIZE% English Essay,—" The Study of Modern history."—Der Keyte Sandford, B.A. of Christ Church, son of the Right h o . Daniel Sandford, D.D. one of the Bishops of the Scots Evi e . pal Church, Edinburgh. Latin Essay.—" De Auguriis et Auspiciis spud Antiquus."— Charlei Juhn Hunter, Esq. U. A. some time of lialliol Cone:, now Fellow of Oriel College, and son of the Right nom se Thomas Plumer, Knight, blaster of the Rolls. Latin Verse.—" fOeusis."—lfon. Geod e William Frederick Howard, of Christ Church, aon of Viscount hint rt h, a 34 grandson of the Earl of CarliSte! sin 'minas nawroc„sev4 t eatac. English Verse.—" Pxstum.". 7 .The sante. Hon. G. W.F. Howard. r.CCLESIASTIC;k4 t.AoalrialeNS. The Rev. C. M. Alount,lati Feklow g. corp u s Christi Col. lege, Oxford, has been appointed, by the Archdeacon of lint, Minister of Christ Church, in that city. The Rev. H. J. Ridley, ALA." Chaplain /o the Lord Chas. ce,llor, and Prebendary of Bristol; to hold, by dispensation, the Rectory of Abinger, Surrey, together with that of Newdigatt, in the lime county. The Rev. W. A, Morgan, to the. perpetual Cure of Tres. mere, Cornwall. _ . The Rev. Samuel Davies, jun. to the perpetual Clancy at Oysternsouth, Glansorgnnthire. . . The - Rev, Mr. llny.ward, Curate of Bexley, was7po Wedate. day seimfght eleeted istalter of .the Free Grimnur. School it Maidstrosse,Th the room-of the Rev. T. 13. Cole, resignid. • The trgisters of the late James Wilkie, -Esq. of Fbultlen, hut presenuld Mr. 41erander Chriptison, Preacher of the Gospel, to the Church and Parish of pauklen, in the county of Renwick, vacant by die trinsLition of the Rev. John Edgar to the l'aisk of• Hutton. - On_the 5d of:May, the Rev. Charles Hope, in virtue of a presentation from Lord Douglas, of Douglas (issued Dearly five years ago, and lately confirmed bp.; decision of the Court of Session), was ordained Minister of the united Parishes ot . snington ind Wandell , in the 'Presbytery of Biggar. At an Ordination held at the Cathedral, St. Finbarry's,Dist, by the Bishop, on the 25th of May, the following persons wile ordained peacons :—C. C Townsend, George Sealy, Forman Gorman, Charles Lorton Coghlan, Henry Wynne, John Ales ander, John Longfield; Samuel Mathews. And the following were ordained Priests :—The Rev. Richard Harold, Charles Leslie, William Hartford, Richaid Kennedy, William Meade, Paris Bradshaw, Henry Clapto Keogh, William Hardin" James CraWford, James Elliott, Jobn R. Smith, and Matt Bloxham. IiXRRIED. Thursday, at Paddington Church, by the Lord Bishop of Lot don, the Rev. Dr. Goodenough, Head Master of Westminsta School, and youngest son of the Lord Bishop of Carlisle, to Mies Praisers Cockertll, youngest daughter of Samuel Pepys Cockerel', Liq. of Westbourne House. The Rev. P. - E. Boissier, to Miss Dumareith daughter dee - - --•-eolonel Dumaresq. The Rev. John Brewster, Vic;r of Greatham, in the coati of Durham, and of I.aughton in Lincolnshire, to Elizahei, eldest daughter of George Frederick Lockley, Esq. of lid& moon -street, London. The Rev. 'f. Skipworth, of Belton ParsOnage, to Ann Hawks. ley, daughter of G. Capes, Esq. of Epworth, Lincolnshire. At Westbury Church, the Rev. 1). Cornforth; to MI'S Collings, of Bristol. The Rev. Orlando Manley, Minister of St. Petrov ' to Jane, youngest daughter of the late P. G. Glubb, Esq. of Liskeard, Cornwall. • At St. New.Cburch, the Ray. Robert Situp. son, M.A. to Ann Catherine, daughter of the late James' Clue, Esq and niece to Dr. Trollope. tray 24, at St. George's, Hanover-square, Robert Downes, Esq. son of the late Rev. Andrew Downes, of . "Witham, to Charlotte Dorothy, shiest daughter of John Luard, Esq. late el Wickham Place, Essex. - Tuesday Knight, the Rev. E. A. Owen, Minister of 114 bead, io Miss M. A. lines, third daughter of Colin Jones Esq. of Careghvyd,. Roiyhead, and many years Commander of his Mapsty's-patket Uxbridge. • • Wednesdu, at Kingston, Hants, the Rev. Thomas Stratus. of Sunderland, to Mary, daughter of William Shoveller, Esq. and sister of Dr. Shoveller, of Port ea. Lately, at fit. Alban's, the Rev. Sir John 'Rimer, Ram d Langleybury, Herta, to Father Stow, daughter of the late Nr. John staw, of :Tenement's of St. Stephen. May 9, at-Tintagel, lieutenant J. lia.ke, R.N. to Min Nag Symons. bray 24, at St. Breads, Captain F. Mitchell, R.N. to Jar. eldest daughter of T. Pritleaux, Esq. of Pengellr Home, nee Wadebridge. May 16, at Wendron, near Helium, Mr. A. Rogers, to Awful second daughter of Mr. Pascoe, of the latter place. DIED. At Barn's, Surrey, on Wednesday, May 31, 3hry, wire of M. - Fitzgerald, Esq. of Percy-street. On the 17th ult. aged 84, the Rev. Dr. Beaufort, Vicar o f Callon, in the county of Louth. May 9,p,. at Wimbledon, the Rev. Joaboa &Ado& X. Vicar of Hitchin, and late Fellow of Trinity C o llege, Cambriace...:l Wednesday, Thomas Oweia, Esq. Student of Noria l o...o College, Cambridge. At Bath, the Rev. C. H. Sampson, D.D Minister onal° l 2- stone Chapel, Essex, and late cane. of, 41se East.iodia ColwiwwiL • Chaplains at the Pr esidency of Madras.. In his 78th year, the Rev. Sir Henry Pock, Bart: of do Hooke, near Lewe s. Lately, the Rev. William Meark Rector of. Kildallews in the county of Cavan. May 20, at Inverness, after a short illness, the Rev. Aleraoskr Fraser, senior Minister of that town, in the 70th year of his au, and 43d of his Ministry. May 14, at Resells, the Rev. Robert Arthur,-Minister ef the United Parish of Kirkmichael and Cullicuddea, in the 70 year of his age, and 47th of his Ministry. Monday, at Weimer, after a long illness, Elizabeth, the widow of Captain Hills, late of the Royal Navy. Lately, at his father's house; in Trimley, Mr. S. H. Woodirlt of his Majesty's ship Liverpool, invalid from Canton , in Ch ina _ - _ _ LONDON Primed and publiihed by I:orti, Titan, Pickci 114ce, Tnn,p:t Da.