Star. — London, England, 1821-02-17 00:00:00

I PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDLVGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, FEBRUARY 16. The Earl of ROSSLY:" called the attention of the House to the notice which his Noble Friend (the Marquis of Lanadown) had given to move that day for the revival of the Committee on Foreign Trade. His Noble Friend, who was absent from in disposition, desired him to discharge the order which stood for that day, and he wished to fix on any day next week that might be mat convenient for their Lordships. As Wednesday next appeared to be an open day, he would, if there were no objec tions, ix the Motion, and move that their Lordships be sum moned fox that day. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, he had e s () objection to the Notion; for if such a Conunittee was to be appointed this Ses sion, it would be necessary to appoint it with the least possible delay. He had himself given notice of moving ;Iris day for the productiou of certain Papers that were connected with the state of our agriculture and internal trade; and as they referred to the subject of the Motion intended to be Made by the Noble .Marquis, he should abstain from moving for them until Wed nesday next, so that both Motions might conic on together.— The Order of the Day was Nit off accordingly. The Earl of ROSSLYN moved for the production of those Accounts that had been laid before the Conunittee last year.— Ordered. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, he did not understand that then was anything that should prevent him from moving the second reading of the Queen's Annuity Bill on Monday next, which he now gave notice of his intention to do, after the other business of the day should be disposed of ; and if there should be any _disposition to debate the subject, there would be other stages in which their Lords'tips would have an opportunity of &lag so.—The order for the second reading was then fixed for Alonday. The Earl of LIMERICK presented a Petition from the No bility, Gentry, Clergy, and Freeholders, of the County of li merick, representing the distressed state of Agriculture in that part of Ireland, and praying that in virtue of the Act of Union, the spirits distilled from grain in Ireland might be allawed tobe sent to the British markets ; •and that the House would grant such relief as, in its wisdom, it should think fit.--Ordered to lie on the table. The Earl of BLESSTNGTON fixed Monday, the 12th of March next, Mr a •Committee on the State of Ireland ; at the same time he moved for Accounts of the Duties upon English Goods imported into lreiand.—Agreed to. • The. Duke of BEDFORD presented the Petition lately voted at the Common Hall of the Livery of London, praying that the Queen might be reinstated in all her rights. His Grace said, the Petition had been in his possession fur some time, but that he was prevented from offering it sooner to their Lordships. Before the Petition was read, the LORI) CHANCELLOR asked if it was regularly signed? and he was answered in the affirmative.—Ordered to lie on the table. The Duke of BEDFORD presented another Petition from certain Proprietors and Occupiers of Land in the Isle of Ely, complaining of Agricultural Distress, and praying for relief. EXPENSES FOIL STATIONERY IN IRELAND. • The Earl of DARN LEY said, that in the last Session of Par . liament he had called the attention of the 'louse to the situation of a personage of no less importance than the Lord Mayor of . Dublin. This person, it appeared, had a Patent for supplying all the Government Offices in Ireland with Stationery. As it was material that information on this subject should be laid be fore the House, he should move, that there be laid before the House Copies of all Communications with the Irish Govern ment for the last five years, relative to the Stationery supplied to the different Public Offices in Ireland. He said, that similar papers had been moved for in the other House of Parliament, and therefore there would be less difficulty in laying them before their Lordships. Lord SIDMOHTII had no,objection to the motion; but so far as reg arded the individual alluded to, he only asked that their Lor dships would for the present suspend their judgment. Lord DARNLEY observed, that the individual, of whose character the Noble Viscount set wed to be so tender, was one of those loyal persons who had lately been professa e , extraordi nary attachment to the Administration ; but he (Lord Darnley) should be very glad, if hereafter it would turn out than this In dividual stood clear of all suspicion; that his Patent was not a job ; and that the Public were not losers by him.—Tbe motion was agreed to. LONGITUDE BILL. On the third reading of the Longitude Bill, The Earl ut DARNLEY complained of the very trifling re= ward which had been given to those employed in exploring the North West Passage. To nse a vulgar phrase—it was penny wise andpoodfoolish. Lord 'AELVILL E replied, that the sum granted was exactly that which thi Act of Parliament had authorised, and that it was distributed in the same proportions as were specified by the Act. The Bill then passed.—Adjourned to Monday. 110USF. OF COMMONS. The House was occupied until half-past four o'clock this day, in balloting for a Cmiroittee to examine into the merits of a Peti tion complaining of an undue Election for the Borough of Truro. Mr. ELIAS wished to put a qaestion to the Vice-President of the Board of Trade, respecting the Timber Trade, namely, whether it WI.S intended to make any alteration in the present system, previous to the Illiort of the Committee? Ni'hether it was likely dr.. Report would be shortly made; or whether it was intended to make a short Report, recommending any tem porary measure? Mr. WA LI. ACE said, he had been misunderstood the other evening: he was supposed to have said, the present regulations were to coutinue till July. Ile had not said so positively; he bad only stated, that if the Committee could not come speedily to a decision, so as to give certaikty to the next ships which would sail, then, to leave them in'tertainty, he intimated, that the present system should be extended to July ; but that decla- ' ration was not a positive one, as, if the Committee could de- 1 Bide in time, some measure might immediately be adopted. Mr. MA ItRYAT presented a Petition front certain Mer chants trading to North America, praying that no alteration might be made in the Timber l)uties.—Laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. _ _ Lord A. HAMILTON moved for a Select Committee, to whom might be referred the Petitions presented from the Scot tish Burghs in the years 1818, 1819, and 1820. The motion was agreed to, and the Committee named. Sir G. WA ititENDER laid on the table the Navy Esti mates for the present year, and said he wished them to be printed, and in the hands of Members as soon as possible, as he Intended moving for the Supply on Monday the 26th. Mr. WARD laid on the table the Estimates fur the Ordnance Department for the current year. On the motion of Mr. WARD that the Estimates be printed, kir. HUME observed, that the printing of the Estimates then could be of no service; and he hoped the Hoy. Gentle man would postpone his motion for the printing of them, until they should know the result of the motion which stood for that night on the Ordnance Estimates. Mr. WARD consented. A new Writ was ordered to be issues for a Member to serve in Parliament for the Borough of Wigton, in the room of the I ion. James Stewart, who had accepted of the office of Steward of the Chiltern I Inndreds. AIL It. 31 ART N gave notice that be would, on 'Monday next, move for leave to bring in a Bill to enable persons charged with felony to employ Counsel. Mr. CU RWEN presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Scatsdale, complaining of the distress of the Agriculturiits, and of trade.—Laid on the table. A1113E5111 NOT brought up- certain Returns relative to the Cornmksariat of Ireland and the Victualling Office.-- Ordered to he on the table. - I Mr. 11. 'MISS gave notice of a motion for Monday week, relative to the Court of Chancery. %Ir. CIIETWYND moved for returns of the number of Fines imposed in the Court of King's Bench during the Luc three .years.—Ordered.. Thi name of the Members absent at the late ballot were ordered to be reported on Monday next. The Orders of the Day for Committees of Supply and Ways and 'Alexis, were postponed to Monday. PETITION OF THOMAS RHODE3.—RIOT AT STAMFORD. Mr. 13EN NETT presented a Petition from a person turned ithodes. The lion. Member said, that the Petition was from a young titan who had been taken up by the Magistrates of &am. for carryiug I.bilough the streets the effigy of Majocchi. . Ltd had been taken up on the 15th of January, and being an d withput, friends, could not find sufficient bail. The 311belittetIC til.tt he was committed to prison, there to re.. ttitt until the ensuing Assizes fur Lincoln, in .Birth neat; though he might`furee been brough up to take his trial, before the Makstrates, on the 2.3 d of a ianueey.. the jail of Stamford. fl 2 which lie waidenfirsed, was llttolosabie: The Hon. Member proceeded to describe - tholiieteked stage of the cells in the pri son, and said that Vse confinement, there' had taken such an ef ' feet on 'the health of theperson whose Petition he held in his hand4tisat spedt in-successivollies the betterpart of the day on which he signed that Petition. His object in laying it before the House was, that those who persecuted the young lad might be induced to desist ; and also of urging the Magistrates to put the jail in such a state as it ought to be, and present a recurrence of these colifplalats.—Laid on the table and ordered to be printed. NEWINGTON SELECT VESTRY BILL. Mr. HOLME SUMNER moved the second read ring of the. Newington Select Vestry Bill. Mr. DENISON said, he was very sorry to impede the progress of any business before the Mouse, but lie conce►ved he would not have done right, if he al- 1 ltowed the second reading of that Bill without op posing it. The objections he had to make then were not so much to the principle of the Bill, for another opportunity would occur for that purpose, but to the manner in which the Bill had been introduced into the House. There was no public meeting of the pa rishioners convened, with a view to consider the pro priety of applying for that Bill. The whole proceed ing had been got up in secret, and by a few indivi duals; and, in fact, the majority of the parishioners were hostile to it, and would, if they had got sufficient and regular notice, have given it every opposition in their power. He should therefore move, by way of amendment ; that the Bill be read a second time that day fortnight. Sir ROBERT WILSON said, that he did not un derstand it to have bees the intention of the Hon. Meaiber opposite to move the second reading of the Bill that day. He expected that he might have con tinued it in the House. for some time, in order that the inhabitants of the Parish might have due notice, and he hoped that he would not now urge it farther, on account of the irregularity of the notice. Mr. HOLME SUMNER said, he regretted ex ceedingly to be opposed to his Honourable Colleague, but he could assure him he was totally misinformed, if he was led to understand that the Parish had not notice. That he could contradict, as he knew the notice had been affixed to the Church door. As to what the Hon. and Gallant General observed with respect to the irregularity of the notice, he admitted that it was not strictly conformable to the orders of i the House ; but in season and in effect it was, he contended, a sufficient notice. If the notice bad been on the Church door three. Sundays in October, it would have been a good and sufficient notice; but it had been put up two Sundays in September, and the first Sunday in October; and is it to be contended that it was in reason. not a good notice, because 'the three Sundays were not in the month of October For those reasons, he did not see any grounds for sus pending the second reading of the Bill. His Hon. Colleague and the Hon. and Gallant General would have ample time and opportunity for opposing the Bill in its future stages. Sir R. WILSON repeated his former objections, and said, he understood from the Hon. Gentleman opposite, that the Bill would not proceed on account of the irregularity of the notice. Mr. H. SUMNER replied with some warmth, that he did not tell him (Sir R. Wilson) that the Bill was not to proceed. Mr. DENISON repeated his former observations, and again begged the House to suspend the Bill until that day fortnight. . Mr. C. CALVERT said, that he was decidedly hostile to the principle of the Bill. In the Parish of Newington, there were no less than 50,000 inhabi. tants of various religious persuasions, and the Bill in question went to exclude from the offices of Overseers and Churchwardens, all that who did not strictly profess the tenets of the Protestant established Church of England. The Bill also professed to have for its object the preventing of tumultuous Meetings; but he denied that there had been any tumultuous Meet ings, and would prove it to the House by reading to them the numbers that usually attended the Vestry. Meetings. The Honourable Member then read from a paper the numbers 41, 50, 36, &e. So that, he ob served, 50 was the greatest number he found to have attended at these Meetings. He could not, therefore, conceive how they could be deemed tumultuous. The Bill went to provide that nineteen individuals would make a Select. Vestry, to which the inhabitants were decidedly hostile, but the Parish was to have a Select Vestry stuffed down its throat, whether or not. Mr. W. WYNN made some observations on the ir regularity of the notice given to the Parish. The SPEAKER went into an explanation of the Resolutions and Orders of the House, with respect to the various forms necessary to be adopted prepara tory to the introduction of a private Bill before the Hocise, and thought that they had not been duly ob served with regard to the Bill before them. He, therefore, should be obliged to call the attention of ' ' the House to it, unless the party bringing in the Bill should consent to postpone it. After a few remarks from the SPEAKER, Mr. SUM NER, and Mr. DENISON, Mr. SUMNER consented to let the amendment stand in place of his motion. Sir ROBERT WILSON immediately rose to pre sent a Petition from the Parishioners of St. Mary, Newington, against the Bill.—Laid on the table. SCOTCH JURY BILL: Mr. KENNEDY brought in the Scotch Jury Bill, and moved that it be read a first time. The LORD ADVOCATE said, that he did not rise ro object to the first reading of this Bill, for he should at all times be ready to give his utmost atten tion to any subject connected with the administration of justice in the Scottish Courts. The Hon. Mem ber had not communicated with him before he sub mitted his Bill to Parliament ; if he had, he (the Lord Advocate) should have told him of his intention to bring in a Bill founded upon the Report of the Commissioners who had inquired into the state of the Courts of Scotland, and of his readiness to consider how far the Hon. Member's object could be embo died in that Bill. He was far from wishing to insti tute an invidious comparison between the practice of the Courts in his own country and that of the Eng lish Courts; but he hoped he might be excused for stating some of the advantages which, in criminal trials, a prisoner enjoyed in Scotland. In the first place he was entitled to a copy of the indictment fif- I teen clear days before his trial; and it must be drawn up with the utmost care, specifying the charge pre cisely, us to time, place, and substance—(Hear)- 1 and the prosecutor was strictly prohibited from going beyond that specification. The'accused was also *ea- I titled to a list of the names and designation k of all the witnesses who mtere to 'ori the trialainst trim--(Hear,--(Hear,hear)—as wera e s ar the names of lw the , jurors by whom he was to be tried. When the trial came on, no witnesses could be re-examined; and, what was perhaps the greatest advantage of all, Counsel was, from first tolast, allowed to the defend ant. These, he submitted, were no common advan tages to the accused; and he contended that it was hardly possible to devise a system better calculated to secure an impartial trial. The only innovation of which he WAS aware, was the introduction of the Eng lish law of treason, which had been made applicable to Scotland at the time of the Union ; and he ad mitted ,that the proceedings under that law were not so favourable to the accused as those under the law of Scotland. Of this it had very lately been his misfortune to witness a melancholy example. In the course of the last summer, no fewer than ninety-eight persons had been indicted for treason, and the same indictment had been served on fifty of them, al though the offences charged- against them had been committed in different Counties, and under different circumstances. In that point the law of Scotland had certainly been altered, and he contended that it had been altered to the prejudice of tie Constitution. Mr. KENNEDY was not surprised that the Learn ed Lord should have felt a wish to make these ob- nervations on the present occasion; but, at the .ame time, he conceived that he himself was fully vindi cated in not having postponed his motion on account of the Learned Lord's absence the other evening. The Learned Lord had complained that many of his countrymen took pleasure in stating the defects of the establishments in Scotland, but he (Mr. Kennedy) was actuated by a very different motive; the love he cherished for the establishments of his country prompted the desire in his mind of remedying their defects, and therefore he felt himself warranted to say that he did not deserve the imputation of the Learned Lord—(Cheers). In introducing a measure which he conceived to be of some importance, he bad thought it his duty to advert to the circumstances which the subject embraced ; and in the discharge of that duty, he certainly did not consider himself bound by the opinions of the Learned Lord, as to the topics to which he ought to allude. The Learned Lord had said, it was not enough to shew the existenee of theo retical defects, and that some practical defect should have been pointed out to warrant the introduction of such a measure as the present; but he (Mr. Ken nedy) was of opinion, that if he exhibited anything faulty in theory, which might lead to injurious im putations on the conduct of the Learned judges who presided over the Criminal Court of Scotland, he did better than if he were to take any indelicate notice of the practice into which these Learned persons were led by such a defective theory. He meant to pro pose that the Bill should be printed, and read a se cond time a week hence, proforma, with an under standing between the Learned Lord and himself, that it should stand over till April, subject to any fttture postponement that might be necessary. . Mr. M. A. TAYLOR was not disposed to agree with the view which the Learned Lord had taken of the Criminal Courts in Scotland. He adverted to the sentence passed on Mr. Muir, in 1794,' and, on the authority of the ablest Lawyers of the day, he professed himself prepared to contend with the Learned Lord, that the Court, in passing that sen tence, had exceeded its power. The LORD ADVOCATE explained, and stated his readiness, whenever occasion should offer, to de monstrate the legality of that judgment. The ques tion had recently undergone a solemn discussion in the Supreme Court of Scotland, and the legality of the sentence had been established by its decision. Mr. J. P. GRANT could not sit in silence, and .hear it said that a solemn decision of the Supreme Court of Scotland had approved of that judgment, when he knew that the ablest Judge on that Bench had expressed a different opinion; and .he was pre pared to assert that there was no Lawyer of eminence in Scotland who did not entertain at least the gravest doubts on.the subject—(Near, hear). . The Bill was then read a first time, and appointed to be read a second time on Thursday next. It was ordered to be printed. IRISH UNION DUTISL Mr. CURWEN presmited a Petition from certain inhabitants of Kendal, praying that the Act of last Session •for continuing the Irish Protecting Duties might be reconsidered. The Honourable Member observed, that in supporting the prayer of the Peti tion, if it could be shewn that the Protecting Duties were advantageous to Ireland, he would be the last man who would wish to see them removed. But the contrary was his opinion, and he was fully persuaded that not only were those duties not advantageous, but most prejudicial to the trade of Ireland. He hoped, therefore, that the Right Honourable Gentleman op posite (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) would not oppose a Committee to consider the effect which they. produced on the trade of both countries. It was quite clear that they could never have been intended as a source of Revenue. He conceived that nothing could be more impolitic than to continue restrictions which were onerous to our own trade, and injurious to that of the Sister Country. Sir HENRY PAIMELL wished to make some observations on the subject before the House. An Act by been passed relative to .what was called the Union Duties, and when he (Sir Henry Parnell) de sired to have the Act revised, the Right Honourable Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) . referred him to what he termed the settlement of the question, in the last Session. The fact was, that in the course of one short month, the Right Honourable Gentle man had got an Act passed through Parliament con taining the Protecting Duties, without any limitation whatever. If the Bill had been delayed, as he (Sir Henry Parnell) had wished, he had no doubt but se veral Petitions would have been presented against it, and one had been put into his hands from the town of Manchester. A duty of ten per cent. was imposed upon manufactures sent from this country to Ireland, a measure which he thought most injurious to the in terests of trade. As_to what were reckoned Protect ing Duties, they arose out of one of the greatest mis takes the Irish Parliament had ever committed. An idea had bcen vainly entertained that manufactures would be established in Ireland, so as to compete with those of England, and hence the Protecting Duties. Now what was the result? It was this, that those !very Protecting Duties had the effect of shutting Irish manufactures out of the English mari et Though the Duties had existed for fo r t y ye .,k they produced no advantage whatever to - Ireland, but, on the contrary, did it a ve r y pm , jury. He hoped that in fume there wo k more restrictions on the trade of the than between one county and another. Mr. C. HUTCHINSON argued ap—' ciple of the Petition, as injurious to Ireland. The removal of the protectii have the effect of throwing a great , sons out of employment in that distress Mr. LITTLETON supported the Petition. Nothing could be more imi impose duties which were literally manufactures of Ireland, rather than them. The measure was of service try, but injured both. A fair except haps, be made in favour of manuf; existed in Ireland before the Union ; ' be said when the duties were made to nufactures which never did exist in Ire) lustrate the point, it was eilough for ' two sorts of manufactures, pottery which were included among those the protecting duties, though they had established in Ireland. Lord A LTHORP expressed his hol sure would be reconsidered. Sir JOHN NEWPORT would not( for a Committee, if he thought that likely to result from it ; but he could _ while duties were suffered to exist which consider in no other light than as a trade of Ireland. The case of pottery cited by the Hon. Member who had the House, was an apt illustration of t were no potteries in Ireland, and yr hardware were to have duties to pi branches of . Irish trade. The same with respect to coals, which, it was well reasonably supplied from England. opinion was; that a measure which affr to Ireland, and did a great injury to ' to be done away as soon as possible. move from the people of both countries of in itation, now that they were ther by the Union. Mr. PEEL said, that the duties wes to Ireland, but Only a tax, and that ti individuals. It would be a great mix that Ireland was benefited by them, tions between the two countries should The CHANCELLOR of the EXCT that Petitions had come from Ireland, the manufacturer might not be takes and he thought the interests of KR consulted. by a gradual extinction of , question. lie admitted that the remos backs and countervailing duties, would provesnent, and the subject had nc notice of Government. But many were concerned. Mr. M. FITZGERALD exp. at the manner in which the subject s. both sides of the House, and concluded vations in support of the Petition by saying, the subject were attentively and impart* dered, many vexatious regulations mig Mr. SHAW agreed witifthe Right cellor of the Exchequer, that the duties ought to be gradual, considering which the question of abolishing them among the commercial men in Ireland. Sir H. PARNELL and Mr. C. IL ally explained. The Petition.was read, and ordered COURT OF SESSIONS ACTS. The Report of the Committee on read. On the question that it be now , Mr. CREEVEY asked if this Report consequence of the Report of the Sec The LORD ADVOCATE said it Mr. CREEVEY thought that some ought to have been afforded to the H, ject, as salaries of a considerable am ! given under the Bill which was to ' this Report. Mr. KENNEDY asked if the salaries as had been recommended by the Commr The LORD ADVOCATE said therr variations, which, when they came rev the House, he hoped he should be able The 'Report was then brought up, given to bring in the Bill. !RIM JUDGES' SALARY B 1 The House went into a Committee The Resolutions woe agreed to, and dered to be brought up on Monday. ARMY ESTIMATES. Lord PALMERSTON brought ul of the Charge.of the Land Forces. IL gave notice, that he should bring forward Estimates, in the Committee of Suppls• night. BRITISH MUSEUM. Mr. LENNARD was of opinion that cilities were not afforded to the Public to the British Museum. Ii large sale to the Officers, then a proportionate v , be demanded on their part. It was mission was given to the Reading-room order from a Trustee or an. Officer I It that was the case, the rule should Hon. Member then moved for an . number of applications and admissions minerals not formerly shewn, the coir drawings, and the Reading-room, fc years, and also for an account of thi money paid to the Officers of the Mut Mr. LONG said, that it was the obj, tees to afford every facility to view the no less than 50,000 persons had been'. mitted, There were two classes of persons the Museum—one from mere curiosity, 'consisted of literary men, who wished to valuable parts of the collection, on ' literary pursuits. With respect to till caution was necessary, on account of articles to which admission was sougl had been sustained from indiscrimi given to the public collections at Paris Trustees' and 10 Officers, who we) ' afford every facility to view the Museu Mr. GURNEY stated, that the Ps facility afforded to them inyewiog the he Could speak flon3 evict le:. ':6led.ellijciiBa(oifitell°i:stvetneharefrel:i°FatttYv:heletYourd -Y:ctrad'ottnt/(114b. -anuetd another . g against the D t ;„ r,.iiiesonhrnhliiastsitd,bhteaoronttohaeapptipsoittetiv.yeitionorr..4....',.. t r er o gxdua t rcli e leisae c yt,np t rt i esuti n iin,fole g sailenlmticrna d tirn u atcbent ti io:the es rmenti : ucaiNtt,e4et i vh .ed the pra y s ; u more iffl b Po t i ‘ itic therm a tax u ervice to neith rr Ok i nd sottery pose h ahemni manufactures .Ist in Ireland? T those that came they had nevertb * aid exist t which h p lit that - any goo d ~; e could anticipa te n o ; in as a tax up on t h pottery and harde r* ho had la s t edi t * Lion of the fa c t 1,, and yet potte r y .* s to protect the m , 4 to same wa s the ca t was well knou i; let ngland. His d ee ik i hich afforded no* ury to England os i )ssible. He w ou ld n ,. a countries every cot : •ere incorporated to gs, 'ties were no protraio t i that tier the be ne f fte i eat mistake to sup them, and all digi t . s should be abolished to EXCHEqUE/ ' Ireland, praying* be taken by surri t; of all would be4 nt ction of the duties the removal of dim. .; :ies, would be as in. I had not escaped tle many local jails* I :pressed his sa *-, .• - 1 ,übject was treod I concluded some • tion by saying, tbet Ind impartially •. • I ions rnightbe Right Hon. the Cha• 1 t the reduction of the insidering the agitaSot .ing them had created t a Ireland. C. HUTCUINSON ILI: I a ordered to be priut INS ACTS. itee on these Acts vs be now brought up, is Report was moan ' 1 he Scotch Commissis? t said it was. hat some informal il ) the House on these. .ble amount were mie ri vas to be founded a I e salaries were the sae s the Commissioners? q said there was eel came regularly We a d be able to justify. ;ht up, and leads ea • :ART BILL. mmittee on this*. d to, and the Report* if onday. a ATES. a ,ric g neg h s. t foH u r p uis,a t Lord h E rd e tideip stimii et f Supply, this day ;Eusi. bi inion that snicks!. e Public, in rge salaries were slit .1 ttt )d [ i (3 t ifii n n w cg a e a t -r e r s 0 v igi l a n ce o s o a fm i said the t%., b mt h t 0 ° i n 0 . akt t ' s should be altered. 'be for an account of r" dmissions to view the coins, prints . 1 Dom, for the last nt of the extra sums.' the Museum. yot ea ai h ,i e v ,pobe been" the c .n3 t sai o nuw i nsi th uaelou oi sd. . La curiosity, and the ", o wished for :Idolise, t 0 ion, on account of r tl rt to this latter CPI ; )unt of the v alueofk f; 41 0 'as sought. — re + t , discriminat; adm 4 _ 4 o " as at Paris. There w to o who were anxious to se Museum. the Pu blicruh,aedutnelf sting th e , I ri JCS c