Star. — London, England, 1822-11-11 00:00:00

vast ashram ('0 “him: chem eeeh-‘nty tern-d there appc mg the “ Olasee' a disposition to' woman“. and hence not. some disputes. The ap pearance of the police in the nations appointed them was Italy formidable. but we are happy to say their powers um not clued into action. HYDE PARK CORNER. At an early hour, this end of the metropolis pre sented a scene of the most animated and unusual bustle: the members of the Committee, mounted, with wands. were gallopping in all directions: and, as early as nine ecloe’k this morning, the various 'l‘radc Societies formiugpart of the Processién began to assemble aloof Slmneustreet and Knightsbridge, and tlfjr specia members and conductors com nzcncc ’e work of marshalling, which, however, was a ta: not to all appearances easily eecomplished; 'but the proceedings were conducted with very great energy and spirit. The following was the appomted route of the Procession a—Piccadilly, St.'James's street, Pall-mall, Chaﬁng-cross, Strand, Fleet-street. Ludgate-hill. St. Paul's Churchoyard, Cheapside. comhill, BlshOpsgatestreet, Sun-street. Finshury square, and City-road. Several Ladies, elegantly dressed, .in barouches, obtained petmi ion tojoin the procession, and they arrived at Kni-é'rﬁbri it) at an early hour. Mr. Hus‘r's colours we e, a ut this time, most plenti {ully distributed, and very generally sported by those «he could obtain possession of them. The assem blage of persons was certainly anther select; but few horsemen appeared. Which was considered as a dis apltoizﬁnrcnl, it being conceived that the equestrian raukrwculd have been extremely numerous. Alter many‘minnr debating; among the Committee, the following was the regulated -. 011 mm OF THE Pnoczssmw. Srcwxds with wands, to clear the way. T radvs' Committee, three abnuE. on hotleba‘k, Ancndams wian wands. - Avtmldmu midi wands. Bmd of .‘lu .75. inclusrd within four poles at light angles.- Th; L‘nmp my and Tnde of Sawyers. six abreast. arm: locked, warms ro‘cttn}, cozkadcs, and devices, wim that Club banncri. emblrms of trade, and motloeo. ancrs carricd by men. Emblem of Industry. Dino, ditto. Grand Military mm], playing most popular lin. The Members of m; Cumnﬁi-tm': of this T'm'le, {out threat. Trade of SJWYCI’I, with Banners. , __ __ mmwcugqsn _s_lx yxolyspts. _ , Spirndidly capariwned, with laurel: handsonmly decorated with sih crud leaves, and rosenea of graham! white ribbons, containing Mr. H UNT and Sir C. WOLSELEY, Mr. NORT ”NOR I'l, {and another Gentleman. The pcszilliuns wore warlct jukets, white waistcoat and breech“. In one corner of the lhrouche was the Cap of Liberty on : pole; in annlher a Fug, with thirteen alternate stripes of dark green and while: an on] ape‘n between the cenu: with the in urip:iun—“ Rights of the People." The Female Reformer: in open Lindaue. The Bcﬂmal Green Committee. ’ The Stewaxds. Banners. The Carpentm’ Society. Flags of the above. Band of Music. The lithounden. Banners. Emblem of Trade. Armour. Armour. Olhet Trades formed dx a-bmst, accompanied by Music and Flags; all those composing the Procession we ﬁrmly~ lwked arm in arm. W 'l‘he Procession: was closed by a crowd of Hanan“), who wue followed by carriages and other vehicles. The ﬁnal arrangements for the Procession being comyletc by half-past ten o'clock, just at this mn meitt Mr. Hunt's arrival was notiﬁed by a horse man. In a few minutes after Mr. Hunt himself ap peared, and was received with the most deafening shouts of applause. ' Mr. llunt instantly ascended the ‘barouche, and, lowing, said a few words to these around him. en neating them to preserve order, and not to break the peace; and, we are happy to say, they behaved with . very great decorum. T At about half-past eleven, the Procession proceeded on its course, Mr. Hunt being cheered through all the streets in the mast gratifying manner possible.—-i The populace. which was immense. cheered loudly; to passing Carlton llouse : so great was the throng; that serious alarm “as entertained for fear of aoci-l dents; the Procession. however, proceeded on its‘ coutseuith great regularity, without any accident: occurring. About lour o'clock they arrived at the Eagle Tavern, in the City-road, where dinner was provided for the party. The Procession passed through Temple-Bar with . out the slightest obstruction, and the immense crowd cheered loudly at the house of Mr. Alderman “fut-"MAN. . Major Canmxcnr appeared at one of the win dows, and waved his hat lhtice. ’ Mr} H usr bowed (0 him. and said to the people, “ Behold the Father of Reform 2" In consequence of some previous arrangement, Sir| C. Wounn and Mr. Nam-[moan did nut proceed; the whole line of road in Mr. Hunr's carriage. Oni the Procession arriving afthe Mansion-House. three loud cheers were given. The whole front was ﬁlled‘ with the Pcrlicc; the- cavalcade then proceeded Im the Eagle Tavern, City-road, where dinnet was‘ provided. COURT OF CHANGER Y. m PO‘TSNOUTH 6483. ~ EX‘PARH 111-LOW”, IN TH. lATTIR 0’ LORD PORTS IOU‘I'H, A QUPQOQBD EUﬂA‘lllO. ‘_ _ Someday morning, at the sitting of the Court. Mr. But. continued his oddretoto lilo Lordship in any?“ of the aﬂdultt, and. was followed on the name dde by )lr. ms; after which Mr. line, on the part of Lord Port-mouth, olnened he had nothing to say in thit cue. Toe evidence was before No Lord thip. It was for his Lordship to protect Lord Port-mouth In‘ the way that he deoervcd to be protected. If he vat of sound‘ “W 3. he wantednoeommiadon; if not. he did. \ Mr. Hons: then addreued the Court In a speech of much force, in behalf of Lady Portsmouth. The Low Clams, make-ring tho Learned Gentleman for some time, said he coon not have the me of the Hall after hflf-patt two. otherwise the students would get no plum M ‘o',- and ash: was obliged to rise wwonﬂte would bein Count on Monday naming by line o'clock. The change that has taken place in respect to the company frequenting taverns is supposed to be owing to the increased expense; but extravagant‘eharges of tavern-keepers in Queen Anne's time were not less‘ deserving of complaint than they are now. The Dake of Onuoxo, who gave a dinner to adw friends a: the Star and Garter, in Pall-mall, was charged £2l 64. Bd. for four dishes and four, that is, ﬁrst and aceuud courses, without wine or dean-t. ‘ saw 3W . , , "t . _, . , <- ‘ .. 4‘l. ‘1 . __» . k .. . . . _ - _ . ~ '.' ”9' . ~‘ ~. ;‘ JR. T‘ ,' T“ “E W 0? OF'Cmes ’l' I:chch raocu‘ out an " . ' - i use murh'oos manor 8: “06mm . ~b ‘ . ‘ ﬁmoromrau‘muar or nausea, on. er. mathematmitmoramm and!“ tantrum ammonium 31:53?" a: one; «use the rm. and mg; i . ere Worm” . ooeo Suﬁsm Who. "dropouts: QumhdArmagl , (Concluded from the Scene! Thursday.) l ‘ ‘ Sir Bauer Maaxnvrnhin continuation. The of-‘ fences over which this Court has c isance are not‘ of a temporal nature. rnrscmnﬁ. not affect to exercise any. jurisdiction overdrese oﬂ'ences, for the purpose of corporal punishment. .lts authority and {‘urndiction are to inquire into and reform the evil abuts and propensities. and in the quaint but‘terse lan guage of my Lord Coke, "It is to reform the inward. logo.” The jurisdictions are altogether distinct and ‘di erent, and there are many instances who found of cases of crime which, for these different purposes, have been made the-subject of the jurisdiction and authority of the Temporal and Ecclesiastical Courts. These oﬂt'ences were all committed in England,'and in a country foreign in respect of its criminal law and jurisdiction. ey could not be inquired into or punished by the municipal law of this land. And me ancholy and abortive would be the law of the Church and its authorities, if crimes such as these, and com mitted by a Prelate of Ireland, “ who should excel all others in purity, and be an example to others to ‘live well and Christianly," should pass unnoticed and unpuni‘shed, because that he had committed these of fences it a foreign country, “ to the scandal of him self and his Church,” and in a country where they might be committed with impunity: and that his iwilful absence from this country, andneglect of his lepiscOpal duties, and contempt of hissnperior, his court and its laws, should protect him from the punish i ment of his crintes, and removal from his sacred ofﬁce. ‘ But the Ecclesiastical Court is not so weak and in ‘competcnt, nor are its authorities so insulﬁcicnt and I abortive in the enforcement of its laws and ordinances. This case affords abundant evidence to the contrary. The law can be applied and fully enforced against the wilful, disobedients and absent man; and it is right and necessary for the 'maintenance of true reli gion. and the discipline of the Church, that its la can be thus administered and enforced. It will not :be necessary to make separate and distinct observa 3tions upon the evidence, as it is to be applied to the ‘ case of identity. The facts herein detailed all of them contribute their due proportion to the establishment of this material fact. But if further obsavation be ‘nccessary, be i: remembered that the Bishop has been ifor the last three months wilfully absent from his ‘ Palace and his Bishopriclt, and has thoroughly neg hlected and deserted the great and important duties jof his station, and that this has been a period of time {when his presence and attendance were more than ‘necessary and anxiously expected, This absence and neglect of duty is in itself a canonical offence, and punishable by its-law. It is, in respect of the oﬁ'ences imputed to the Bishop, of small account. But it is a fact that is of some importance in the ascertain ment of his crime and of his identity. His absence commenced immediately before the commission of his great crime, and has continued ever since.— It has covered the period of the proceedings in this cause, their commencement, aud‘approaching ter mination. It cannot be now presumed that he is ig norant of their nature and purpose. One other cir cu'mstance, and decisive on this part of the case, re mains to he stated. Since the institution of this suit, and the notiﬁcation of its commencement and pur pose. a public sale by auction has been held of all the Bishop’s property, at the Palace of Clogher. The entire stock and furniture have been sold, and the Palace, which should be the place of his constant re sidence and hospitality, is now bereft of ever'y article that could contribute to its comfort or convenience. He had to ask pardon for having dwelt solong in the statement of this case; but its importance was great. The duty imposed on his Grace and his Brethren was painful, but it was necessary and no. avoidable. The act required of them was the exer cise of a duty which his Grace and his Brethren owed to themselves, and their successors, to their Goo, and their country. The evidence was then read in Open Court. It was full and satisfactory. in the proof of all the facts ad verted to by the Learned Advocate in his Opening speech, and particularly to the commission of those acts which formed the foundation of and constituted the necessity for the proceeding: The same reason which .was assigned by the arned Advocate for not detailing those facts in his speech, will inﬂuence our determination, and justify us in withholding from the Public a statement of facts so truly disgraceful and degrading to the person accused, and now con victed, and aﬂlicting to his much-respected family and friends. The testamentary ewdence was read by the Proctor of ofﬁce, as called for by Dr. Staples, commencing with the Bishop of Clogher’s admission into Holy Orders, and terminating with the sale of his property in Clogher. ‘ - i When these several documents were all read and entered, Sir Hanna MIRIDY'I'K stated to the Court“ that the evidence had closed. a The evidence boin thus closed, ' i Dr. S'rA'rus, on Ste part of the Ofﬁce, observed , upon it, and particularly upon the law which.re-‘ gulated the proceeding, and established its propriety and necessity, nearly in the following terms. We have now, my Lords, gone throught e evidence ini this very distressing case, and, as we conceive, have‘ fully borne out by proof the offences charged by the articles a ainst the unfortunate person accused. Some increasechiﬂicnlty has been imposed upon us by the‘ peculiar circumstance of the impugnant not having i appeared. lie is not before your Lordships either in fperson or by roctor, and thence has arisen the ne» ‘cessity of much evidence to identify Percy Bishop of Clogher as the person guilty of the enormities.—- That some person committed those oﬁ'enc’es at the time and place stated, is not questioned. It is now my duty to shew your Lordships, by a few» observa tions on the evidence laid before you. that that per son was Percy Lord Bishop of Clogher. First, it ap pears by the evidence that the person who committed these offences on the evening of the 19th of July last, ‘ was habited like a Dignitary of the Church. His} figure also and appearance is particularly described; and accord precisely with the testimony of other wit-j nesses personally acquainted with the BishopofClog-l ‘c'r ~ '|!'«!,.l'll .I-! (r t! 9 ‘ ‘ . \ f.“ ‘ 9'3 ' ,n' ”o. ' i «iifc-Azﬁsr¥2;r 'J "M“. ''.’ .. ~‘ hm. a ft 5:74 3; I 11l ! lg 9‘31“ , a '- ' a ‘1» «2 ~ F'y. ' .~ . ~:‘ , ‘, . _. 1 .- t.. M?“ , . .4“, ~, A,“ '*i§2.i:r‘s";' ‘ 33“,?!" a? ~ .aw mini; *. . '. . in _ ." ﬁeld: . ..' his“ I'ﬂhﬁtymaturalrsrtberwr WW . ‘ .' . . ’ ‘ . . Cl“ ',' -, k mthvnmmwggm -'!‘"°"f"_cla~e sarw‘mﬁmm by afﬁne-“ﬂ; 1». m, hm“ . h". M “’B9 rewrite“ IM’iﬁa-h guiltyfof' sags ﬂoﬂi ' m“ a . eraw “It; hf! oflewdness. titanium: grins scandal, ”a ’title “em . I mm!” ‘, a! .mmoralnawndtthelike, mhe‘onduct is punish evidence to which I ‘ oulcdbsh the , “"3 I”? ' able ""7 the. Clﬂlastieal Courts. audio that case; Court human, ' 8’9"“ "”9“.” .a“ ‘m'ﬁmuﬁmﬁmﬂewdhl Offence. n-ayhechsrsed dividuali the h“ npon thopersnn of "9“.“ i” "'4‘?“ lintidemallyrof the guilt imputed—’s be all II . zuchchoase. This decorum,“ if!“ The law is thus‘l‘aid down by 3;, Wm. Scott, in thd lb ‘3“ "‘9‘. {endeavourd ‘9 destroy, ",‘d {‘2' ”'9 “N's“.- Nash. lst vol. of Mr. Haggard's Be. 'nib 5:202 tore it into costumes. and threw tt pom, p. 140. 1., gm “,9.- which “‘5 a ”in“ a tsunami??? 13:?!“ vgglhszrved.-l;'7 MJ’. divorce, tlrcilibcl charged that the party impers‘fnng . ’ .m. ‘ es W“ very was mairie before, to which itcw b" th~‘ commendabledtltgeace picked up theiornfragments such a charm was inadmissible ”o”a ' at o p I! a :‘fa‘hislzpet udnpasted them together tn-such a felony. In giving his judgment on thrmtézgs: Th: Miler the contents perfectly legrble.- William ‘Scott “7*“ Certainly this Court cannot mornirpgtl: “ii"mm'd' '9 produced the nest inquire into a felony directly. even where aCles-gy. sence of the ‘;° "0f the Magistrate. In the PTG- man is sued for the purpose of deprivation“ But it addressed‘to Eta“? “d appeared '3 i” ‘ Jen" is very freduent, and has occurred in practice to ad “Ro m}. h n a 3:39 o:33pm and signed mitafact in itself criminal, to he pleaded a. I nc. b him “a hf.‘3 . 1° its-«meandfead cessary fact of the evidence in a civil suit." In the bbsinesi. The F 89“}; :1! 1° '8 “mufﬁn! .00 P"_‘“‘° case of Lucy 17. Watson, before noticed, it was also ICI .tnm it ,who. no any» the Bull"? objected that many of the charges against the Bishop ”dd :95“ "'37 B°oB 81‘8de! u in. arm. and as were temporal; on which Lord Holt observes “the :ion' (”$253331 fag-3138:: 3:25;; ::i- assgmcrimcn which will answer most of the ohjéctions . , . . ~ W in is, at as to what relates to theoﬂice of Bi 33.3.38 3.3.33 3.3.38... 3. 8.38'38 8' 3...... 8888 3.383: socalling himself Bishop ofClogbenwho immediately 3.111035923358888 ‘” " S'ml'm'. “MW" - ~ , ted Cawdr s case. to ' :‘ls‘ecgnd tune tore the paper and totally demoyeéit- Reports. p. Pl, in which the nine law is 13.93:: c. ocument being thus anmhtlated. no proof could ‘8 The ecclesiastical law and the temporal law but be given of thehand-wnt‘tng, but we have read. eyi. gum] proceedin s, and to several ends. The c. deuce enough to shew that. Lord Rodeo, whose stg- temporal, to inlfct punishment on the body lander nature was subscribed to thrs letter, ts the nephew of or goods; the other spiritual ro ' e basics": ‘ Percy. Btslwp 0f Clqgher. and wall in the habit of the one to punish the outward iii—xiii... to sea corresponding With him. 8“ WhTCh we ‘ubmi! afford form theinward." These authorities are decisive. But strong evidence of the individual claiming this letter further it is to be observed that in the case before being the person who filled that station. The next your Lordships no temporal 05m“. amountin to 3 pm: of evidence I; the note written by the same per- felony is charged. The articles impute lewd habits, “”3 "ms :‘h. “'B'“ m the cell s‘“ the watchohouse, gross and scandal-its practices and'immoralities, none ‘nd nag; b 5”: ”3‘ C°“"' It “PM” ‘0 be “the" of them amounting to felonies, but clearly cognizable * '0 7- tWahng, 21. Montague-street. P 011013!“ in this Court, contrary to the Canons, and sub'ect. square. andstgned wrth the mutual letters “EC." repre- “’8 the party t 0 deprivation. Having now as] we SJVMIKE the name and title of the litshop of Cloghef- conceive, established the facts charged against the feCla'ehproicd that a 99““ calling “(“59" BIShOP individual accused, and also the jurisdiction of the 0 ,”8 3“ odged ‘t 1h“ house, and that John Court, it only remains for your Lordship’s sentence. Wanna W“. h" servant, and we have further proved This is a duty I am aware must be most painful to that the whole of the contents of that note, and the the Court: yet, however distressing the act may be, ddrectton on the back of it are the handwriting of I am conﬁdent your Lordship will conscientiously ‘ '3 B'Sh°P.°f 0108““ ““3 fa“ “'9 have “V‘bhd‘ed and boldly pronounce that sentence which the law :1 the testimony. of four 01' 5" witnesses, ﬁnd who demands. You will cut off this pcstileut member, and ‘Y‘, 5“" acquainted "“1 “if Chifnﬂﬂ 0‘ 1‘" hand-. discharge your duty to your country and your Goo. ﬁ'mx’ and corresponded mm mm ‘9' sm“, ”3'," His Grace the Loan Pasture, after some coa mitaizs 1m“ detected m the comrmssron 0f enor- ferettce with his Brethren, requested that the Court .’ are here imputed, should resort to the should be cleared. Sir Henry Meredyth before he gmhﬂghzfmaif'wnzg akﬁctttrous name Qmongbapzt- reticed‘ tendered to his Grace a written sentence, for .. . un nown, '5 9°} an tmpro e his perusal and approval, referring to and founded 3")?“"3? but “'3‘ g" .“mfh md'z'tal. shop‘ldho: upon the evidence in the cause The, sentence was eay ore,an urtn ewo ttmeea - .° .. 8.83.5313," 38.88888 B'B3 “8:88:38 8,8,.M°,8,88888888;8 “:1: Em”; 323122.? liti?§l."§?in .... n o nce was no ute to rm ave - a false name, is not corisistent with .any “52:51: tence. His Grace and Brethren remained for some motiVe, and yet we have proved that the same per- time in conference. It was then announced that the son who,on the night of the 19th of July, gave Court was opened, and that the attendance of the himself out in the watch-house as Bishop of Clogher, Advocates 3“" Prmtor Of Ofﬁce was exl""3"~'d- They and signed a, for his name the initials up. C.» accordingly attbnded. and thereupon his Grace the had lodged at Mr. Fay's house in Montague- Lord Primate. in the presence and hearing of his street, far many days before as Bishop of Cloghen brethren the Lords Bishops, of hisVicar-General, and This circumstance, we conceive, has great weight in of other distinguished personages, tose front his seat, establishing identity. The next material fact is, that ”"3“ ‘h" “We of the auditory thenOstandinlh and ““5 when it became necessary to give 'bail, the person Btshopiof ClOgher being again thrice called, but not 323338.83833383°;8338'383;,3233333:83:~» 33333333:3'33'333'33383.333383333833833 . .s 'c . I. ac‘ , ’ , ‘ knowledged his recggnizance, which was sorecordtd read ‘3" “mm“ (”Will 2"“ a; pear hereafter) in inhthiel oﬂicke of the lagisttate. :‘hlels; are all the bat“ :ﬁzié;“sm :1: ”:3: 'f "I‘3 m 0? "PP”;S" and wrc too ace in n on, wic ean mit a un- , ' t n o'" a One 0 20'“ lat mani dautly substantiate that the person accused was the (“ted h" “,"°"3° (“1"‘8’ and delicacy i“ “1° db person he represented himself to be, namely, the ““923 °f ‘l‘" Palnful “"4 ""90""m duty. When ‘ Bishop of Clogher. Yet add to this, that the regular ﬁntshed, he signed it in open Court, and. directed it process of your Lordship's court has been duly served ‘0 be “"3,“ in ‘1" [3'8252'1 0? hii Diocese, W 136"! it u n the real Bisho of th 'at hisE isco 31p.” now remains a rccor o t esetm , rtant rocee in :8 hi 3, his Cathedral (ghurchjtarstfieall other £placeps from and ‘Pf their PEI‘fCCt consummaiizn by lii” 355015“; whence theservice of such process must be concluded g°P"':"°l';. “In“ QCPWUQ“ 0* DOW” Pf“! 10°91!“ to reach hts knowledge—that that process calls upon ’o'" t c “ WP'EQk 0f “08"". and his Episcopal .him to defend himself against these disgraceful "d" and authorities. ‘chargcs, upon pain of deprivation. That the charges '—"" .against him are notorious to the empire and the ‘ world, and that as no appearance has been entered for him, no defence made, no denial of the charge lattempted, can a doubt remain as to the Bishop lof Clogher being the real guilty individual ? But we have further proved that asale by auction has taken placein the Episcopal Palace, that that splendid appendage of his dignity has been left as a naked ruin—that all this must have been done by the au. thority of the Bishop—that he has absented himself from his See and his duty, eyer since he went to Lon don, ashort time previous to the commission of the enormities charged against him, altogether forming a mass of evidence of identity which we conceive to be perfectly irresistible. The oﬂ'ence and the identity of the person accused being thus established, 1 do not thiult it necessary to trouble the Court at mush length in order to prove tlseir jurisdiction and autho rity to punish such ofences,eyen to the extent of de-' prtvation. It is quite settled law that every Arch bishop has provincial power over all his Bishops, and may hold his Court where he pleases in his province,‘ and oﬂiciate as Judge. This isso laid down in Lord Chief Baron Comyn’s digest - Eccl. Persons, c. l. and it is also stated that be may deprive. In the much debated case of Lucy v. Watson, Bishop of St. David's, iris laid down by Lord Hon. one of~the ablest Judges that ever sat in England, that “ Ad mitting the point of jurisdiction to 'be disputed, would be ‘0 admit the disputing of fundamentals, for the Archbishop has, without doubt, provincial juris-3 diction over all his Suﬁ'ragan BishopS. _which he: may exercise in what place of the province he pleases," 1. Burns’ Ecclesiastical Last, page 161-1 The history of our Chunch. also, from the most an -cient times, aﬁ'ords abundant instances of the exerb‘ ‘cise of this jurisdiction; .a number of those instances ; will be found collected by Dr. Watson, in his Cler gyman‘s Law. p. 57. The general jurisdiction is therefore quite clear. Objections, however, have been ”£sth that this jurisdiction is conﬁned to were. I: tactical We“, and cannot attend to critisei at common law. To this unswelB it is submitted, the . Ecclesiastical Court cann% try a mere ‘ temporal ofence—fot instance, murder committed by an eccle siastic; for the Court cannOt try murder, or judge. what is murder. In such case, in order to puni , the spiritual eourt'rnust wait for conviction by the temporal courts (or outlawry, which hunter-cunt), If), I“ 4- , 4 .'-.v' 1’ . an-v ~.: t Janka '35 . . ~ ﬁ ks ;, . , “If! t _5 1 PRDESTRIANISM. . Lu't week 3 man undertook to run ten miles in one hour and nix minum, on the road leading from Southampton {o Tilda ﬁeld, and did it in three minutes under the time. CORN EXCHANGE. MARK-LANE, NOV. 11. Last week the supplies of all tortt of grain were tolerabfy large, and mi; manning there were I great many vessels in com weys There was I demand for superﬁne samples early in the morning, on full.» good tetmt at last Mondey; but afterward! the trade became dull, an‘ pticet at all sorts of grain were con ,ddened‘nther lower than this day te‘nnlglxt. Prime ample. of barley for maltlng tells freely; .boiling peas continue dull tale a: last quotations; been: and grey peas. remain unaltered ln ptlce. ‘ ‘11.; Inge quantities of Date in but cause-d a dull trade,“ 1 they en rather lower. Rape Seed is cnnliderably dearer. [LIMITATIONS LAI'I' WEEK. What. English, qn. 61’05 Rye, qu- - Bulq - 3859 Dean. Mill ' 3533 Pea. 0m - _ 1015 Irish Barley 0 9M . I 7” 990 4 I“ Mr, him 19,175. "ton on mum or amp. What, Red, Old “I u. Rye; New - u. 13. ....._. White ‘ no 45: Beam, sun New “a ”e Red. New 28! 41s —— Old 27: so. - White 52: 46- 1‘“, New - 203 “I Barley. Old 1|: 93s Old - we“ __ New 81: 34¢ Oats, Feed - 170 19. hm: . ~‘- 40'- “! —. Ema - I). 9!: Pen, Hog - e 4: 26f P - u. as. ’ - Maple - 27: 28. - Potato: ' - an m White ‘- 960 W M,per&ek scone. Boilers - as 35. Want Lat :81. :09! GENERAL AVERAGE PRICE OF BRITISH COIN, (um-cu amu- IIMITAMI), For the Week ending Nov. 2, 1892, made up (tom the Reﬁne of the Impecton in the diluent 01th- md Towns in s‘. land and Wales. Wheat :84 56 I On- 19- nd Beam 2a m Barley 27s 3d R 1: 90: 'ld. Pen no: N Sacha—Average Price of Btowh or Mnieando Sugar. com puted that the Mum made in the Week 3nd!" “Nov. 1822. SOI- 4N. per cwt. exclusive of Importation Dada. SMITHFIELD MARKET, NOVEMIER 11. M was a very full market this mowing of, ell «subtle. of Cattle. among which were I pen number of W 01:11. which the Butchers obtained at I low prices in «bud.- lcrl’tloll of Oxeo the made my mum den, and a gnu In. her man unsold. 11.. price of every ankle of net: I)! h quoted It In! Market-def- price" upon the whole. he‘s. wu very duh—Crunch _ ‘ Mfusdmupu m 7 or an»; mm...» a. V'qf'li toil. M.uo¢:ouu—mn Manning, 5:“; Cdvcgm; "81::an lanwga4,4so;mm—no' a .mpuo : name-nuisanc- ! ' Straw, 11. 83.10 11.16», ‘ ‘ ’3‘: Mfg," r; W. "7%, ‘._., pg" .L ..r ~ r