Star. — London, England, 1821-06-06 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, JUNE. 4. GORDON V. GORDON. The LORD CHANCELLOR, this morning, entered at some length into the pleadings of this suit, and made a declaration of the principal points upon which his decree would be founded. All that he could do, he said, was to order that the agreement made between Mr. James Gordon and the plaintiff, for the purpose of settling some family disputes, and executed by the plaintiff, on the supposition of his being illegitimate, should be delivered up to be cancelled. The Court below had decided that the plaintiff, Harry Gordon, the younger, was the heir at law of Harry Gordon the elder; and it appeared that, at the time the agreement was made, the defendant was in the pos session of the important circumstance of the so lemnization of a private marriage, but that the plain tiff was .wholly unacquainted with it. His decree ould, therefore, be guided by that decision, which slistablished that James Gordon was not the heir at '.law of Harry Gordon the elder ; but that Harry Gor don, the plaintiff, was his heir at law. But he would band his minutes to the parties, for them to see the points to which he chiefly referred; and, if they had any observations to make, lie would hear them on Thursday, previously to his finally disposing of the matter in question. Mr. James Gordon addressed the Court, and corny plained of an affidavit that had been filed, on a former motion ' in this cause. The LORD CHANCELLOR replied, that the affidavit alluded to would not affect his decree, but that he Was at liberty to mention that, and also to address the Court on the subject of the minutes, on Thurs day, if he thought proper. IN THE MATTER OF THE PORTSMOUTH DANS; AND IN TIM MATTER OF HOWARD AND GIBBS, satataurrs. Mr. MONTA6UE stated, that this was an appeal from the decision of his Honour the Vice-Chancellor against the competency of assignees to supersede a commission of bankruptcy, after they had made their election to accept the office and the trust attending it: The appeal was made in the case of the Ports mouth Bank, after the commission had proceeded so far as to expend upwards of £4OOO in an ineffectual attenrpt to work it. In the case of Howard and Gibbs 'bankruptcy, there was a great question whe ther there was a substantial petitioning creditor's debt; and in the present, and in many instances, it v. as highly desirable that an immediate decision should be made, equal to the magnitude of the sub ject. He then requested his Lordship to appoint a day on which it would be convenient to hear the appeal of the Portsmouth Bank. The LORD CHANCELLOR.—" On Thursday I will name a day when I can hear it." . CONSISTORY COURT, JUNE S. AYLMER V. AYLbIER. This was a suit of divorce or separation, by reason of adultery, promoted by the wife against her hus band. The marriage and identity of the persons•trere fully proved. The husband was an officer in the army, and married, in the year 1820, a young lady, by whom a sum of money had been advanced to wards the payment of his debts. Before this con nexion, he had formed an adulterous intercourse with a female of the name of Morgan; and within a •ery few months after his matrimonial union, he re turned to• this connexion, in which he has ever since continued to live. The JUDGE pronounced the sentence. LABOREE V. LABOnEE. This was a similar suit promoted by the husband, a French cook and. restaurateur, against the wile. The history of- the adulterous intercourse between Madame Laboree and a Lieutenant Bland was by no means deficient in its details ; but as further evidence WAS considered to be wanting, in order to establish the identity of the parties, the case was directed to stand over till next Session, in order to allow time to supply it. VIE MARQUIS OF DONEGAL v. MAY, FALSELY CALLED THE MARCHIONESS OF DONEGAL. In the case of the Marquis against the Marchioness of Donegal, one witness was permitted to be exa mined, de bene esse, out of the regular and ordinary course, and without allowing time to administer to her the customary interrogatories. This exemption was defended by Dr. Phillimore and Dr. Jesse Adams, on the ground of the extreme old age and precarious health of the witness, who had twice broken a blood-vessel ; and was opposed by Dr.. Lushington, (for Mr. Chichester, M.P. the presumptive heir to the' titles and possessions, in case of the illegitimacy of the children being established) on the ground of pos sible collusion between the Marquis and Marchioness, and of influence exercised upon the witness. The Court allowed the examination of this witness, an old w oman of seventy-three, who was present at the marriage, on condition that if she survived to the period at which her regular examination in chief, and the administration of interrogatories, could take place, the present one should be entirely quashed. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE s. JACOBS V. JONES. • This was an action for an assault. The plaintiff was a glass-cutter, in Charles -street, Soho, and defendant was clerk to Goss and Co. what fingers. in Thames street. •On the day on which the alleged assault took place, the defendant, it appeared, went to the plain tiff's house for payment of a bill, due from the plain tiff to Messrs. Goss and Co. The plaintiff not being ready to pay, the defendant made some observations on the length of time which the bill had been stand ing, alleging that the credit exceeded two years.— The plaintiff said this was false, and desired the de fendant to quit the house, as he would call and settle with Mr. Goss. Instead of quitting the house, the defendant seized the plaintiff by the collar, struck him in the face, knocked him down, and kicked him ♦iolently. This was the assault complained of. Wit cesses were called tc -prove these facts. Mr. PLATT, for the defendant, addressed the Jury; he acknowledged that an assault had been commit ted by his client, but urged in mitigation the provo cation which had been given to him by the language of the plaintiff. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff—Da mages 30s.—Costs 40. DAVIS V. SHAW. This was an action brought for slander by tl. r - a, who v, as Captain's Steward, in the ship &Laval! daring a voyage from Madras to London, in 1819, against the defendant, an Officer of Dragoons. Mr. ScAatirr stated the case. The plaintiff, it appeared, was Captain's Steward of the ship Man gles, and sailed in that capacity in the year 1818, from Madras to London. The defendant, a Dragoon Officer, came home kith a party, principally of the 14th Regiment, in the Mangles ; and, for some debt which he owed him, gave the plaintiff a gun. On the arrival of the vessel in this country, the passen-1 gers, who were fifteen in number, agreed to sub scribe £1 a piece, as a reward for the Steward's at tention. When the cash was being gathered, however, Mr. Shaw said that the plaintiff was a thief, and had stolen his gun; upon which the passengers retracted their intention, and the plaintiff lost that bounty to which his good conduct had entitled him. Captains Edmund Forster and Charles Greville, of the 14th Dragoons, proved the words used by Mr. Shaw, and the consequent loss sustained by Davis. No defence was offered; and the Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages £lOO. MIDDLF:SEX SESSIONS. The Sessions ;;;Menced yestetday, before the Chairman, Mr. CONST, and a Bench of Magistiatec. THE KING, AT TILE PROSECUTION OF JAMES BROWNE, ESQ. M.P. V. ROBERT BINGHAM, ESQ. This was a prosecution for endeavouring to pro voke to fight a duel, and excited great interest from the rank of the parties—the prosecutor being Repre sentative in Parliament for the County sof Mayo, in Ireland, of which the defendant is the High Sheriff. nr. PHILLIPS, the Irish Barrister, who has been lately called to the bar in this country, ably stated the case for the prosecution. The facts as stated by the Learned Gentleman, and proved in evidence, were simply as follows :—Some time in the month of February last, the prosecutor being at the time On a visit at the house of his father in-law, in Kent, the defendant called on him, and stated that he had come over from Ireland for the purpose of complaining to him of the conduct of the Postmaster of Ennis, near which town in Ireland the defendant resides, and who, he said, was insufferably uncivil to him and his family. He proceeded to say, that he understood the Postmaster had been ap pointed through the influence of the prosecutor's father (the Right Hon. Denis Browne), and therefore he applied to the prosecutor to procure him redress, by the removal of the Postmaster from his situation. The prosecutor assured the defendant that he would acquaint his father with the complaint the defendant had mule. The prosecutor accordingly lost no time in making his father acquainted with the defendant's complaint of the Postmaster, in consequence of which his father gave him a written paper, stating, that it was not through his interest the Postmaster had been appointed. In a short time after the defendant called again on the prosecutor, who laid this paper on the table, and was about to leave the zoom without giving any further explanation, when the defendant, calling him back, said he had other business with him, for, said he, "your father has made my uncle promises which must be enforced, and I have brought a ft iend from Ireland for that purpose, and I expect a meeting him you." The prosecutor replied he had nothing further to say, and was leaving the room, but the defendant called him again, and insisted on a meeting, saying at the same time, " we can't fight in this country ; I am going to Mayo, and I know you'll be there Soon." 4con after this the defendant wrote a letter to the prosecutor, which clearly nue& fested his determination to force the prosecutor to fight a duel. James Browne, Esq. the prosecutor, proved the facts, and stated, that he never bad any quaxrel or dispute with the defendant, nor had he ever . given him the slightest provocation. Mr. ALLEY addressed the Jury on the behalf of the defendant. The CiTAIRMAS charged the Jury, that if they believed the defendant intended to provoke the pro secutor to fight a duel, they must return a verdict of guilty. The Jury, without any hesitation, found the de fendant Guilty, and the Court sentenced him to pay a tine of 1.2.50, and find security to keep the peace, himself in and two sureties in £lOO, for two years.--The defendant paid the fine in Court, and was allowed to depart. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DUBLIN, JUNE e. C.%U.A r. NONANIAItA• The judgment of the Court was delivered in this case on the Ist instant. It will be recollected that the plaintiff obtained a verdict fur heavy damages for a breach of promise of marriage. Judge: FLETCIIER, MOORE, and JOHNSON, were of opinion, that the ver dict could not stand. Lord NORBURY differed from his brdther Judges, but •the majority being against the verdict, it was accordingly set aside. On the 2 , lth ult. a daring robbery was committed in the house of Mr. William Warnock, of Cloghfin, near Armagh. The villains bound the whole family, consisting of four persons, some of whom they beat severely with sticks. They exercised the most horrid brutality towards an old woman, aged about eighty years. In order to induce her to confess where her property was concealed, they placed her on a fire of straw. The following property was removed, viz. in gold nine guineas and a half, some silver, eighty dozen of yarn, a quantity of wearing apparel, bacon, &c. Some of the goods were found on Saturday, in a pipe, on the road leading from Lurgavallen to Armagh. Two fellows, Dennis Moore, of Newry, and John O'Neal, of Armagh, have been taken up and committed to jail, informations having been lodged against them for the robbery. About ten o'clock on Friday night (25th ult.) the house of Mr. Patrick Drew, of Mount Newton county of Meath, was entered by four men, three o f whom were armed with a blunderbuss and pistols; a fifth remained outside the door, and occasionally gave directions to those within the house. Mr. Drew got out of a window, for the purpose of alarming his. neighbours, but he was pursued by the robbers and brought back. They remained upwards of two hours in the house, and took away with them two silver watches, silver spoons, several other articles of plate, some cash, and a quantity of apparel. On Saturday night (the 26th ult.) three dwelling houses and thirteen office-houses, were set on fire and consumed, at a place called Woodend, at the foot of Blackamore-hill, situate one mile from Blessington, 'd six miles from RattiCoole, in the County of , lor The premises destroyed were unoccupied. BRIDGE-STREET A 3SOCI A FLOM MaNsiosi-House:.—Yesterday Mr. PARKINq, the ex-Sheriff, waited upon the LORD MAYOR, at the Jus tice-room, as his Lordship was performing the public duties of the day, and stated that he had an applica tion to make to him of the most serious nature. Mr. P.a nuns stated, that himself and other citi zens had obtained the knowledge, and had seen with alarm, the growth of a monstrous Association, which he had, from its origin, conceived to be illegal ; and perceiving its growth to assume a most dangerous character, he had, some days since, taken the opinion of Mr. Thackray, a Barrister of considerable research, who at once declared it to be an Association con trary to the Statutes, and, in fact, to the Common Law of the land. Ttr o Lawyers of great learning had, since this, spoken of the Association in question in the House of Commons; but it was not until Mon day last that one of them had described it as an ille gal combination within the Statute. Seeing that the combination was increasing, he thought it his duty, as a subject and as a citizen, to apply to his Lord ship for warrants to apprehend the most active mem bers of the confederacy, that the penalty of the law might be visited upon them, and that, by the exam ples made of the ringleaders, ignorant persons might be cautioned against being entrapped into an Asso ciation, which they would find to their surprise to be both illtgal and unconstitutional. He further stated, that it was for the want of mature arrangement, and not from any doubt as to the illegality of the com bination, that he had not made a much earlier appli cation to his Lordship to put the law in force in a summary manner against the confederacy, which had assumed the name of the " Constitutional Associa tion." lie hal, he said, upon the present occa,ion, retained the Learned Counsel, who would state to his Lordship the giounds of the application. Mr. TUACKItAY said, he grounded the application for warrants to apprehend the individuals as being Members of an Association upon the Act of the ;19th of Geo. 111. cap. 79, sec. '2, against illegal As sociations. There were three points upon which he founded the application against the body complained of. The first was, as being contrary to the Act, in setting forth, subscribing to, and publishing a De claration not required by law, and which had not been registered at the office of the Clerk of the Peace, in the manner and form required or directed by that Statute. The second point upon which the ap. plication was founded was, that the Association formed part of a branch Society as forbidden by, and within the intent of the Act. Upon this point he cited the Declaration of the Society, in which it was stated, that it had been determined " to adopt a sys tem of correspondence with those Members who live at a distance, and with such Associations as may be willing to co-operate in promoting the same objects," &c. The third point upon which he proceeded was, that the parties against whom they applied for war rants, formed a portion of a Society, the whole of whose names were not known to the Society at large. He lead over the names of several anonymous cor respondents—Nil de,Terandum, I'ro liege et Lege, J. P. P. B,:c. He argued upon the above points, and commented upon the section of the Act, which is to the following effect : " And every Society, the Members whereof shall take, or in any matinee bind themselves by any oath or engagement, on be coming, and in consequence of being, Members of such Society, and every Society, the Members whereof shall take, subscribe, or assent to, test or declaration, not required by law, or not au- thorised in any manner herein after mentioned, and every So ciety, of which the names of the Members, or of any of them, shall be kept secret from the Society at large, or which shill have any Committee, so chosen or appointed, that the Members constituting the same shall not be known to the Soeh.ty at large to be Members of such Committee, or select body, or which shall have any President, Treasurer, Secretary, Delegate, or other Officer, so chosen or appointed, that the election or ap pointment of such persons to such offices, shall not be known to the . Sociaty at large, or of which the names of all the Members of all the Committees or select bodies, shall not be entered in a book or books to be open to the inspection of all the Members of such Society, and every Society which shall be composed of different divisions or branches, or of different parts acting in any manner separately, or distinct from each other, or of which any part shall have a distinct President, Secretary, Treasurer, Dele gate or other Officer elected or appointed by such other part, to act as an Officer for such other part, shall be deemed and taken to be unlawful combinations and confederacies; and every person or persons, who from and after the passing of this Act,shall after wards act as Members thereof, and every person, who from and after the passing of this Act, shall directly or Indirectly maintain correspondence or intercourse with any such Society, or with any division, branch, Committee, or other select body, President, &c. or who shall by contribution of money, or otherwise, aid or abet, or support such Society, shall be deemed guilty of an un lawful combination and confederacy." The Act further goes on to authorise the Magis trate to proceed in a summary manner against each Member, and upon proof on oath, to convict him or her in the penalty of £2O, and in default of payment, to three months' imprisonment in the common Jail, or Home of Correction. The Learned Counsel sub mitted that the Association in question was directly in the face of this Statute and indeed against - the Common Law. He could offer much more, but he trusted that what he had already stated would be fully sufficient for their present purpose. The LORD MAYOR put it, whether the Act cited was not of a temporary nature, against particular Societies existing at the time of the enactment? Mr. THACkRAY submitted that it was not by any means of a temporary nature, and that the words of the Act particularly directed it against such Associa tions as that complained of, which, he contended, under the mask and appearance of a Constitutional Society, was more dangerous to the .well-being, and more likely eventually to overturn the Constitution and the established Government, than any whose avowed objects were directly hostile to the Govern ment. The exception of the Act in favour of such Societies as were confined to " religious and chari table purposes only," confirmed the obvious construc tion which he contended for. The LORD MAYOR said, that as the matter was 1 one in which there was some nicety of legal construe tions, and one which was of the most serious import ance, he should take time to deliberate and consult the Legal Authorities, before he decided upon any measures which might affect the liberty of indivi duals.—The parties then left the Office, on the un derstanding that they are to receive an answer on a future day. ROW IN ST. GILES'S. During the whole 4 Sunday gterooon, the pariskot of th. Giles and Bloomsbury were one scene of riot and disturhane.,_ arising out of ot.e of those brawls which occasionally take p k .c : between the low Irish residing in that quart e r. About th„,' o'clock, a mob of about 400 persons assembled in B ue k„: 4 ,7 street, armed with sticks and other weapons, and cornmenc;t ; most desperate fight, each party being decorated with guishing colours. The women employed themselves in ccr ec ., ing brickbats for their respective champions, and at length eee party beat the other into High Holborn. The latter then ralli e d, and forced the others back to St. Giles's again, where the ae raf was truly dreadful, and no less titan 20 men were conveyed to the hospitals and Doctors' shops, four of whom are not /aka, to recover from their bruises. At length S. Furzman, eee the constables of the parish, with about 20 assistants, arrived, 1= were speedily repulsed; and it was not till Sir ROZERT lLu s sent a strong detachment of the Bow-street patrol, th e; anything like order could be maintained. The officers charg e d upon them with their drawn swords, and succeeded in appre hending about twenty of the principal rioters, who were ;04c, in the strong-room of Sr. Giles's watch-house. Aloaday th e y were brought up to Bow-street Office for examination. Th e ph :. goners being called on for their defence, all spoke at once, d e _ dating they were pneeable men, and knew nothing at all of th e row. They were ordered to find good bail for their al i s eateke at the Sessions. On their names being called over by the cleric ; they generally answered " Here, y'r Honour :" Upon that of Michael Taylor being called, the answer was," Faith, its Michael Bryan, y'r Honour manes, and that's myself l"—It was stat e d by one of the officers, in the course of the examination, that t h e disturbances would not be so frequent, nor so fetociotn, if d 'were not for one Paddy APCormic, who kept a depot of lagis, which kr let nut at a penny a dozen per ran! Graham, who was sentenced to be hanged at the late Cuntl , e. land Assizes, but °lit:Lined the met cy of the Crown, endeavotrel to elTect h7s escspe the night befi.re his removal to the He made " a man of straw,"laid i; in his bed, dis,;eised it wra his night-eap. and secreted himself in the privy. Presently the turnk.l came round, as usual, to lock up. He looked in Cts, ham's evil, and call. d upon him to speak. No answer;—Le nag apparently very chisely in the etubt...e , .s of 3lorphesti. The turnkey, however, too wary to unit to app . /ran:ll, Sh.^k the supposed prisoner by the shoultier, trd immediately covered the deception. Search was made, and the was secured. ►►►►i rus... . - Last week, at l'ortsmotah, the Lady of the Rec. Dr. rat :•, Professor of the ltoyal Na•al Colic3e, of a daughter. At Limerick, the Lady of Captain iloLinn, 4th Rcrr::::t Corps, of a daitzliter. MARRIED. At Cove Church, 11. Williams, Esq. surgeon, Roy:1 Navy, Jane, eldest daughter of 1)r. Staimtreet. At Belfast, John Iluddleston 9 Esq. Zsth Regiment, to Din, third daughter of the late John Al`Cammon, Esq. At Chester, T. G. Peaeocke, Esq. Captain 55th Regiment, Miss Young, daughter of John Youfig, q. of Cheshire. • May 29, at Bothwell Castle, Robert Douglas, Esq. of Stnth. hendry, Captain in the 7th Hussars, to the Hon. Mary Silky Douglas, youngest daughter of Lord Douglas. May 29, at blassov; Mr. James Wils;n, surgeon, to Grace, eldest daughter of the late Mr. John Grieve, surgeon, Clan= May 28, at Edinburgh, Captain Robson, of the pith Regiraer, Madras Establis h ment, to lienrketa Mackenzie, daughter ct Mr. Thomas Knox, formerly of Firth. • At Madras, the 26th Dec. last, Alexander Fairlie Brum Esq. of the Civil Service of the Hon. East India Company, third son of Sir William Bruce, of Stenhouse, Bart. to Mary Anne, ellen daughter of the late Robert Cathcart, Esq. W. S. DIED. At Calcutta, on the 25th May, 1820, Mr. James Eassondate of the Hon. Flat India Company's service, son of the hte.Mr. Robert Easton, Leys of Errol. Nov. 50, at Bombay, Joseph William Cumine, F.l. of the Hon. East India Company's Medical Service, second son a Archibald Cumine, Ess, of Allschry, Abenieen.hire. Feb. 18, on his pitsage to England, Captain John Wari, - ntsn, of the 17th Regiment Native Infantry, Madras Establishment. May sf, aged twenty-five, Montague Hamilton, youngest son of Colonel Brown, of Amwell Bury, Herts. May 27, occasioned by swallowing a farthing, the son of Mr. Ellmore, of Newport. May 25, suddenly, in a fit of apoplexy, John Campbell, Es/. of Conduit Vale, Blackheath. May 16, at Bodnod, Denbighshire, John Forbes, Esq. of Boa nod, formerly Captain in the 40th Regiment of Foot. Friday, at Bath, the Right Hon. John Campbell, Lord Cawdor, Baron Cawdor, of Castlemartin, Pembrokeshire. His Lordstap is succeeded in his title and estates by the lion. John Frederizi Campbell, M.P. for Carmarthen. Tuesday se'nnight, at his lodgings in Portsmouth, Lord Francis Thynne, late Midshipman of his Majesty's ship Rochefort, sca of the Marquis of Bath. His Lord,hip's remains have beta removed, for interment, to Longleat, Wilts.__ _ Marel;l7, at Wynberg, Cap; of Good Hope, Captain Jell Graham, of Finny, late of the Care Regiment, Commandant of Simon's Town. At Old Orchard, near Rathfarnbam, Wm. Larkin, Esq. for E many years employed by the General Post-office, Dublin, as Civil ngineer. The 25th ult. at Whickham, in the county of Durham, Char lotte Elizabeth, wife of the Hon. and Rev. Edward Grey. At Itaddery-House, on the 30th April, aged 18, Miss Sophia Fowler, eldest surviving daughter of James Fowler, Esq. of Grange and Raddcry. Monday se'nnight, at Delph, Saddleworth, occasioned by the overturning of a stage-coach, near Manchester, aged 64, Mr. J. Scholefield, brewer, of Liverpool. May 22, at Leith, in the 27th year of his age, while on his return from the {Hand of St. Vincent, mr. Wm. Scott, jun. only son of Mr. Win. Scott, merchant, Glasgow. Last week, at Axon Cottage, near Christchurch, aged 70, the Lady of Admiral John Osborne. . Friday, in the prime of life, at Gosport, Mrs. Tracy, wife of Captain Tracy, late of Warsash. In Waterford, Captain S. Newport. Thursday, in the 16th year of her age, Anne, the third lough. ter of the Rev. M. Vicars, of the city of York. In Limerick, Lieutenant Strich, half-pay 6th Regiment. May 24, at Bath, Mrs. Wright, the wife of the Rev. G. Wright, of Wham House, war Doncaster. May 25, at Dalmellington, Mr. John Watt, aged 86, and far upwards of seventy- years a public performer on the sidle. When his faculty in this way was nor put in requisition, he would make the fiddle give place to the plough, cart, or any other instrome t of husbandry; and within these six yean has been seen .rforming the principal part in a plough-gang, le which the ages of the performers—the ploughman, the gardsman, and two horses, amounted to 211 years! His wife and he liygd together in unison for sixty years. - at the Manse of Lust, the Rev. Dr. John Stuart, Minister of that parish, who will be long held in gnireful rc membrance by a numerous circle of acquaintances, for his dis tinguished attainments in Literature and Science, as well as fur unfeigned piety, and the most active exertions in promoting the knowledge of the Sacred Scriptures among his countrymen-- His labours in this good work are well known to the Public, and particularly to the Church of Scotland, of which, for more than 46 years, he was an ornament and a conscientious 31iniiter, and will long remain embalmed in the memories of the virtuous and the good. May 14, aged 79, Rebecca Mitchell, pauper, of Ovenden,near Halifax. After her decease, the Overseers of the Poor, bang ap plied to, searched the house, and found 36 earthen vessels, con taining either bread or some other kind of victuals, 56 bags of meal, seven bushels of bones, 50 pounds of rags, also several par cels of money concealed among the turf and rubbish under the bed, amounting in the whole to 21. 35. sd. May Sl, at Hallam, near Sheffield, aged 95, Mr.W. Woodhouse. He carried straw to the King's troops on Doncaster Moor, during the rebellion of 1745. He beheld, as his descendants, i chil dren, 75 grand-children, SO great grand-children ; in all, 165. The united ages of three old persons who atten ded his funcrd, amounted to 940. . - -- - HIGH-WATER at LONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW- Mcrning - . 4 minutes after 7 Afternoon . - 28 -------- 7_+ LONDON : Printed and published by Lam Ksxr, PLk* Place, Temple-liar. •