Star. — London, England, 1810-11-14 00:00:00

CF - FLINCH OF WALLS'S COUNCIL. NoyElanga COUNTY 0R CORNWALL —The , were nominated for Sheriffs by Royal Higlxress the Prince of W Hislmess'e Council Chamber, Sonieriet-plat Monday, the 12th-day of November, at the fifty-first year of the reign of his present Majesty King George the Third, and in the year of our Lord 1810: galusbury t relaw trey, of Prrotptite, Esq. Coietean Rasbleigh, of Pridraux, John Vivian, of Pencalenneek. Esq. The names of those who were nominated for She riffs by the Lords of p Council, at the Exchequer, ou the Morrow of Saint Martin, hi the fifty-first year of the reign of King George the Third, 4hd in the year of our Lord 1810 : livdtorthii:re—Joseph Howell, of Market.street, Esq.; Robert Hopkins, of Sunden, Esq. ; John Cooper, of Tod , lUtgton, Esq. Berkshire—William Wiseman Clarke, of Ardingmn, Lpq.; Adam Bliusdy, of hiugston Bagbuae, Esq.; George Elwes, of Mar eham, f.'s} Buckinghamshire—Sir Wm. Claytop,pf Hirleyford. Bart.; Wm. Pigott, of Dodderahali, E :` ; Wm. Bernard, of Nether Win ciduton, Esq. Cembridgeobire-endt-luotingdeodtU'e--Wm. Dunn Gardiner, of Cltatteris. E.g.; John Ed.s, d Wisbeach, Esq. ; John,Wing, of 'lloraey, 14. • • Clte„hire-,Ralph Leycester. of Taft, Esq. ; Booth Grey, of Ash ton Hayes, Esq. ; Richard Leigh, of Adlingten, Esq. Cu.olterlattel—John Lash, of Woodside, Esq.; Thomas Hartley, of Lintimaite, Esq.; Sir Wastell Boieelk, of Crofton Place,' Ban.. porbyattire—Godfrey Meynell, of Langley, req. ; Richard Bate '' man, of Poston; Esq. ; Robert Ostitirt . , of Darby Abbey, ;F.aq. Dev ontitire--Art Mir CbantOrnowsta;reEDartington, Esq. • Paul rehy, Treby, of Goodatatore, Esq.; /CMS Haytpf - 7.7 '7'l ay . Il ha ve a oppritmaki . of stapping au - k w . which wr mid be very differe nt it 4 71ee tr istOa7 u f the point offset preceded that of th. p l . of law. JPc thou of opinion, that whether si:e n : sider die 'convenient - a., or the jitstice, kir the d ote ,; mate certainty of the cause, our gra nt i ng t h e p applicatioft will' be ofitdvantage." Mr. Justice Cestoese—o After the very able aig lucid explanation given by the Chief J ust i n , no d a y -whatever caalse left upon The mind of any man vs to the props iety of the opinem he has adopt e d - no ,ini, is, certainly, left on my mind. In every case in eeh. ,-' a point of law and a point of het are involv e d ) i t is , the higt-est impettance ttrat the point of law J en p be first decided If the ii, is Su .the fi rst i,,,, tuic clearly laid down, . all -lotion vision ity is done ;:w4v ail hesitatinn also as,so obe proportintief dam age ' The ultimate quest* here nu/ be as to the exc, aced to a greAt diffi:tence may arose as to whee,r: act was totally illeg-al, or trislyin some slielit sie r outstepping the boundaries of law. A gr e e g , 1 aft he did with his Lordship; that a erinitittlvau sleight be derived from certainty ssi t h respect tG ,‘ legl,l4y of the juste cation tau sip•ai the recent, fully coincided with him in opinion a: loth? Tatum ' • Mr. Justice Le Bonne.----" Titer,: are, It . type three different action depend'?,; on this oft tr tion : one against the person issuing the wa rm; .- other against - the person executing it. and a fill against the person receiving in consequence of ~ ' apprasennion. In one of thz•se cases an lour at la has been joined ; and that issue, it has been ac .i in . eats only be decided by.th Court ; ini man e; e ? te a l . Lthe decision is to take place on the detnntrer or some subsequent application. The tidy question r : maining then is, whether the dinision ef the Titans, Of law should not precede the Dial iteh e ( p o e m I fact ? Whether or not the way would not be that belt cleared for an ultimate and definite decision? N ow i t ~ 'I has been admitted, that one trial must be deferred, 1 and that the regulation of damagesi 1 the other trials I can only be estimated by the decision o: the law poke I, Would it not be better then at once to decide the poise t of law, and thus come to an accurate anti definite& ' cision as to the quantum of damages afterwards I-' 1 I think it undoubtedly should : no inconveaime as arise from that measure, ;aid it Las Lot bees evert hinted that it would be prlducdve of sny iniustice. slut unless the point of law is decided at fine, it h I allowed on all hands that much inconvenience anti ! embarrassment may arise ; at all events ne certainty ' can be h -41 when so impOrtaut a point is left in doubt , a necessity might anse for the assessment of Ili6ert4 damages. (h, these grnends I think the applicatiun Perfectly pr oper." . Mr. J ... e It te s ty.—" I agree that the granti::: v this app - ..... would he productive of much convt . nienee • •.v • the Court, the Jury, and the panics iremediat l e4 coor.erned. 'lle damages to be assessed mutt enrirely depend Upon die legality or illevAity ,of the plea in justificntic n. if the plea Is decided to be illegal, the damages may be-had fur theeruire urn , prisonment ; if lejal, of course they car. be had oar for the excess. Panin, , , :es could only Le had cyre.iiii i for the excels ; tholie 'nth respect to the general issue imug be esiihrtmt• If die Court was to direct is Jury is the first place only to find damages fie the eeeess,-an ineonvenieneentust arise to the plaintiff ship case the justi fi cation should be subsequently dectneti illegel. Another inconvenience might ens/ to (hi I plettrl• Li‘, for fir case he now recovered tor the excess it might be pleaded after Wards in Abbot's case, the. ' damages were already had for the same injury, and i the case thereby stopped. The only way, den, for the Court now to proceed was first to decide the poi's' of law, anti afterwards proceed to the trial of the GEL The plaiutilT had na right to complain of this pro. ceecling nom, as it was at his option in the first place ' to put the demurrer on or off." - Mr. Serjeant 8111:Par.R1).--.44 I With to know, it there any definite time hereby apvieted for the trial, of the point of fact ?" Lord EettNuonouest.—" Ernther Shepherd, no definite time can be a - printed, as the trial must to depend on the contingency of when rite law ar gument takes place. When that is decided, the Coon I will be very glad to afford you evcry faciNty in the further progress of proceeding." I. Rule made absolute to put off the tri,:l gnerary. i tat io ‘eUnger , I ali e liN* 3 ' "at t. . pleased, tempered. , "Learned at Ges ell. . Atrolhdes. Itasca: Wiltshire, Uolton,aud West,. Serjeant concluded by moving , that the rule for post s Oldad-stfet, London. poning the trial Of the issue beepecherged. Robert Serridge,late of Winston, Middlesex, merchant, Nov. 17, at teen, Dec. 4, 25, at ten, at CluildhalL Attorney, Mr. War t . The A i Keit TT° t - Geer.itee, itr . refify. thanked the broogli, Copthall-courf, Throgmorton-street. , i Learned Serjeant for his candid and lucid statement Thomas Lee, of Poland-street, oxford-street, Middles:it, easels- 'of the circumstances in which his case stood. The maker, dealer and chapman, Nov. 17, at two, Dec. 4; iis, at Court wou ld be gratified in hearing from the Learn ten, at Guildhall. Attorney, Mr.Eastabrook, Hay-market. • ~. ed berleant, that the postponemene of the trials would William Rolte, of Lower Edmonton, Middlesex, victualler and bay.dealer and chaptnan, Nov. 20,27, aed Dec. 25, at temee, be neither of advantage nor disaAvantagetothe Plain - - at Guildhall. Attornies, Messrs. Stratton and Allport, No. 41, tiff. It was plainly allowed on his (the Attorney- Shoreditcb. - General's) part, that. no delay had taken place on Willizais Stacey, now or late of Fromley, Surrey, horse-dealer and the opposite side which was not perfectly within the chaptuan, Nev. 24, at eleven, Dec. 1,2.5, at ten, at Guiltliodl• Attorney, Mr. John Manning, No 6, Clement's Inn. practice of the Courts It was then only left to him humbly to intreat their Lordships to arrange the pro. I ceeding according to the 'retire of the qttestients and Ithe convenience of justice. The. Learned Serjeant COURT OF KING'S BENCA, NOV. 13. I allowed that. there could be no advantage to either silt FltANtilb BORDETI' V. COLEMAN. i side, in the disposition which the Court might make; Mr, Serjeant Sueetrene addressed the Court. He .and if the convenience of justice required a pocul:er lone to shew cause why the rule, obtained by the At- disposition of the cases, for clearing the pants in torney General for delaying the trial of the issues, in . question, and bringing every doubt 'to a full decision, the several cases in which Sir Francis Burdett was it was to he hoped their Lcrdships Mould think fit to plaintiff, should not be made absolute. He would be ; adopt that dispesitiou. He might go farther, and permitted by the Court now to allude to the case in say, that it wouht he for the benefit of the panics which the Earl of Moira was' defendant. This had themselves. They both thought themselves in the been grounded on certain points, whiCh were already right, and nothing could be more adeantegenes for amply detailed to the Court. Some of these points - both than to skew the truth of the ground on which were the same with those which occurred in the other ' they stood. How did the parties stand in those cases? actions, but 'some were totally di ff erent. The At- 1 In one of them, the plaintiff had demurred to the torney General had stated that a material witness for i whole justification, declaring it utterly without faun the Earl of Moira was absent in Portugal. Under 1 dation in point of law.: In the case of Me. Coleman, these circumstances it would not become the plaintiff, . the justification was admitted. The plaintiff here, of or the Counsel who advised him, to urge on the pro-1 course, could recover nothing beyond the excess ; but secution. No cause would ',therefore be sbewn I a reserve lurked behind, on which the plaintiff was against the application in that case. Bet in the case' silent. The justification would be thrown off, aid in ,of Sir Francis Burdett againsteMr. Coleman, no such, i, the event contended against as bad in law. And was it cause of delay occurred. :Pre Attorney. General had Ito be said. that the same measure of damages was to on a former day stated, as it were, thaelistory of tjte i be.exacted from a man, whose cenducr had been le proceeding. and it becarneaamecessarplo trouble the . ' gal up. to a certain point, and a man whose conduct Colin with it now. But that Learned Otter. ha d I was illegal from his very fist act ? T e he I.earnd charged the plaintiff with delay in the paoceedinga I i Seeieant had said, tile plaintiff would restrain his as if he had been only excited by being Ailed to re. claim to damages for excess. Then came,the reser ply, and had taken advantage of all the delay width Lvatioo. If the Jury should not find the' defendant he could contrive to interpose between'tlae proceed.,l: - guilty of t.ie excess ; then it Was to be set upe that ings. This was - all in ipplicable to the plaintiff. He ', the whiee jesification was bad, and the plaintiff mutt had not produced any delay in eitherar the causes !have .t verdict. If the plaintiff gained - a verdict for which it was pmereed to bring to the verdict of a i the excess, then he would come again to the Court ; Jury. There s' ce , certain Rules of Court, which ap- i and if the justification were bad, put. in a amen for pointed the time of the several proceedings. Those' larger damages. Thisinconeenienoevresforeseen in the Itules had not been in any instance violated. There ; original view of The case, and to obviate it the prieret was do reason why the plaintiff should anticipate the course had been adopted. IL was first required that time for bringing on the argument upon the demurrer. ; the point of law should be decided. There woull When there were two causes of action against tett, : then be a lodgment of the Court in Banco , that the distinct persons. there was no reason why the plaintif f : justification was either good, or worth nothing ; thee should relinquish the choice which it had suited birn I, would then be a rule fir the Jury to fied images to make, and bring forward that one which he had I accordingly. There would be no crinfurien in the b&tfore postponed. There was no reason why he 1 procc , s, and no uncertainty in the law:' But if tbk should .desire to set down the demurrer for argument 1 demurrer was not decidedp, every ding wrielale in within a a shorter time than dui required hy tier the dark. The Learned 56:leant had pliiiiilyitittiod Court. Ift those cases, some questions were the same, !gift thes e s would be no advantage to oithet side, in .. but others ' were substantially different . It was, of i asp( pecußar arrangement of the causes. [Here Mr. comae* to ho. admitted, as to the trial of the issues, , Serjeant Shepherd interfered and said that the At.; that whatever might be the event of those triale, the i torney-Caeieral had Misinterpreted his words, which same question 4privilege would be raised again in i'ete . " that, •nd advantage of convenience to the the• argument upon the deroUrrer. But would t,he 1 etsert, or expedition to the jndgment of the question,, course of justice be cleared by taking the demurrer i could arise from any peculiar arrangement." He first i The same qaestion must come in all the cases 1 hadikaid nothing of advantage or disadvantage to to be tried. Supposineothat the issue was tried in • the parties.] mlt is * ," said the ATTAIIINEV-GCSEKAI., the first instence,,,and that the defendant, Mr. Cole- e rather extreoedinary that I should have so, mistaken min, obtained a . -verdict, the question of privilege i the Learned Counsel. for I remember his words dis would come immediately before the Conn ; for it t tinctly. He has now said of course, what he meant would be competent for the plaintiff to'move for a i to say, not what he said; for it is very odd it my ears Rule to . shew cause why a verdict should not . be en. could have so completely deceived me." . tercel for the plaintiff. This could not surely be a' Mr. Serjeant SUeettente—o Then, Sir. I did not reason for bringing forward the argument upon the deserve the compliment of candour and lucidness . It was not necessary for stirring the cues- _wlsich you paid me." privilege, because that question would be • 'Mr. AT'2OIINET-GitlirtAL• ..--‘g 0, yes, Sir, you and disposed of in the course of the argwearit 'Were perfectly candid, you were perfectly lucid, fur trial t or upon the motion which would follew nOthiog could be more distinct to my ear than your Suppose the demurrer to be *goad, and expressitins ; but I will not insist on what you did parties to be dissatisfied with their. , Lordships'' not mean to say." - . writ of eld be brought. 'risen The Ae•roe ser-CEMMAL, after a few remarks on another ' ita ted same question ag. . the power of the Court to arrange the proceedings for Court of Error ; their the mutual benefit of the parties, prayed their Lord think it proper t o del a y • ships that the rule miht be made absolute, for delay. ing the trial of the issues until after the argument on question was disposed IIY lIIS MAJESTY', ROYAL Li.rflißs VAIIiNT. the priority of the at- the demurrer. • T EAltE's Genuine PILLS, so justlyfemous for impede the trials of Lord EL.S.22IIOTtOUGH•—Ii The Court, in arranging ' ie, t h eir superior etHracy in curio; every degree and syringes.' the trials might make proceedings, do nor so much consult the wishes tit the ! girlie Venereal Disease, the Starry, P.x. without ton6nententer .• unnecessary, as Ore parties as the ultimate attainment of justice. If the 1 rt'staint of dist► to an , *: 44 Y. exr-atin" , sa fe, a9a "' id Las. ourt are of opinion, that the course at present pray . in the course of the Cmatt taitcle , s OH la a dose, lts operation imperecr ! ncr . One ,ed for well save eepence to the p trues, and clear the i lib i l e e ' -an ze d P‘•.eluierieePyg no particu l ar attention. choreruel Diwrders ; ead . verdict were obtained question would be at rest ; path of justice, they will grant the motion. In many ceses where an issue and demurrer arose in the same eolied for. • But if the yen..where they rail in that time of perfectly restorlag heal* the l e ' tient has the !Any assuraneu that he or she is at the ere €‘1144 the question wo sad be cause, the Court Have thought it proper that the de murrer should be argued fi rst. I have found great enter a verdieefer the inconvenience from the contrary process. It was but part, cy peculiar ar . e t r o into these 40 7, with tt., ono * necessary - to hover the 1 aw eil c i u s i t s oti n x i:at dearees u of twaliguanc p y .„_ he ever ac l e givist. to ;matter, they ryoedity disioJge and expel. T h ey area - ease of Burden ;Taloa List Term, that a trial came on, JO' which a verdict . red by experience to be a pre•servcr of health, as MUM 14 s rate' . against Colemen*!-- lof damages was given, but upon looking.. ioto the re . oar , * &wit ardi eiltht!iath' rib srglna an ' i f4 " °"/ " 14 it appeared that not a terthirig damages could 11* **ll ' thil PatLl3"*lllsik • " im es"lng4umr"' • °lliic. re r = to . Clettilite%.. the plahstiff had a right I cord, ow whoever he promised Is sett from them, they Wt . 4ial-road,Mhidkiseit, I, There was eto appareet } have been given by law. On the first view A Mr, fallfl aid exceed, as though Inr , atiest of iinsnortsl and u • er, Pr; tit ;. pet I.7t•Chaber . Counsel should now pre- ' Coleman's case, it would appear that there was no lathe. These I' i lls sre xi:oat-we:thy a place in the cs . .autts:t i ,tin Air, iSarkr.4l4Ori.:lc-court, . The question would he i question about the justificatii In ; bet the I.earned.gee. Mast esa Ira C: rain* of ships; the inure I°. lar that elai . - - 'Temple!. 1 ~F . 4 ' 4 ' 2 ' ~.: ...,17,''.... *err good in :at cll.:notes any length of time, and Ike they treated in•both with e nal consideration.. The ar u • jeant says, that sine obrtanu ; 1 46'a he will mo e tl rhineas de' Tlartieltililiqmit, Of flee* Pilitreii4trect. Good. Court for a verdict for the pia . ine . iff i . The sneli v ur . n - of '', l4"r b e ,a,, bcir iZi, th ar. e ,t.r,,,,,iir of n t ear () th G uir U 7 at ri b:J, w i: i ita i l l u le dt rea t ‘i lrl iratilii ` int dist. rale , vit a l, iv i k u„,.. ,cs, merc h,,i , a ll iro a nd e t utp „,„,, .N o ,„ i me i nt would be in both l equally solemn and dignified , g 1 2p, 2T, and Dec. 25, at 'toe, at Gulled% :' Artorn:ts,ll ! lesiirs.. an d decisive. - There could be no failure of justice in damages for an act 'pertly legel.and partly illeg • al, and tot telt yeani tl.ey hive radically cored syn . :Ands ot . 4o.moil' eP ac . i for an ac: itlegal fr .oi the beginning,. must of course Evitt• and R Peon, liarlati-sitsifteri v hdauhle.:: ' adopting the present course. It was distinctly •tiesla Ifilliino Ilauks„ who is. in cilfiastii!tihitlth .John Run andgait, many Yoe whom had been dia.:halved frooi tiospi; , 4. Ow % cording to the' R u l e s of the Court: Their Lordships be very different. If We go to trial, - adm i tt i ng t he serwatoie bad been frefitteutlY rypeateal, aril .d 1 utiser un. sjs c osins Br y o n , of ittnr:strcet, ChtipMe; Lotdon, linendra h d of a course ' - • a power to dispense with those Rules • ; . i tificetien and only elatmln I - • ,us . , gl. aroages for. the pin- tz r zu". egeareet 'u:ce°f anal widw o ,o ut a te .by .eet th . e Sole Proprietor, Teem A• Tarie4. pers,dtalet's ,ktid chapmen Not IS; at„iitio,'Nov. 14, le.:d Dec. go, ac twe l ve , a t GuSAN I IM., Aitatusi, , 3ar, k,,,,, , ,,, 0 .,k, No . Goo forbid that they should not, where justice ass to lent outrage, which constitutes, the excess above the '. .lier of the It oyalCpßoge sri Surgeons in I.ondon,at ti, Woe, '4B, liaytuati.et. . - ' ..;.• .: , be expedited. But where there was sin issue in faCti )gal right. then lain ii, 00.1Yfets a minor. measure or ' i c ton as a terwer p v Sealy Fond:inter and William Saloii SC Charlig-Criia.s:Midal, and Aill issue in litho the plaintiff had an acknowledg.;loneges ; bui it.the , tuitl at and the atith ft• ears, if pow-p.iiil, 6n the same terms, observing in all . cases Sr sex, authiners, dealers and elsaisaieb, Nienitiirr 11, .it - one, - it'd t i g ht to Set 40%.11 116 i ss u es according to the coutse , lad, . or_ity ondef .. whie h l'rfr, Ccileinan Ratsi t g o rl i oterte. secrecy, no_pitimes name or air having ." 11 2 Nov. 24 , slut December 24, at teas at GuildhleL Attorrici, f d s eo ed ,sed,, i9l' t 9 i) e g e e te w t . m ilri e labia these th ese ; lA lttl ere ise a ll i e nd 4i w i i l ll ‘ a 'i n v s e n a •e d r A l'a ct ;i l :i ittthirillai t -3• ~. , , Mqssra. Milton and Puwnalls, Knight Riders-street, Dostors'- . which it suited his convenience to pursue. . mar, -* Arai earepitticular respiest, l •• • FroPri"`" - he ! Co. Co:unions, Loarloil• - • , . • . . i • Mr. Justice B. mint Do you come to recovetO, - he loin eaeerey, of icetbta4iithi, StoTr • • r, dealer sae damages for the excess, or for the whole trespass ?" .: oa/ t artan, NO,. W, t,s, and khae.,S '.;•-• twelve, at Goialtiall. ; . it:nalte • 1 • Mr. Serjetibt 6tir.risinin.- 4, My Lord, for the et. Attorney, Mk. Walker, OW 'etym. totut Inlay, of opettiatt-court,'orogrieWerearest, boo r, iu- ces3 merely : we do not consider.tbe 'defendant as a su r e icoeoaoo.aesOe antiAluiptmio, Nou.'t 7, at•elsveii,Nuv. trespasser a ;..;tis. . liut suppose ihieleintiXelionSes ~,, sod Dec. 43, -an. tweive,:at .ouildhall. Ameretli 11 / 4 1 . 1 .. to claim tidrna:.us only for. the excess,, ilc May . 0 . 11401 t ' Ches ted Ilanuasi, 3V4a4•Olatelciadrt., ftsm•streci. . • • 4tolvtilere. : He may consfder wheillei he *0 uot be l'hoinan Mmikia, it.skeekuato.;.3uries,_eaakfactor, dealer and , , • alt s t igggi, x -Satisfied With damages for the excess, and no ode tag ebapinan, Nov. 1.7, at elatais, Now %eland 4411 1 iiith so thindkatL 'ittteivireys Aii:: ttgessal**Picet+iiiii- e Oilkei - ; 114- 4t 1 $ Oa pushehim on farther in the ' elnito: "'Vile xe.at, eeetoinel. _ e , • • •:+ , z, • ieteooesirOteeet. • e Learned inerjeaut k loot proceeded s ::-. V stifin tittio, l . 11;04%4 Slav:4s "Ind' $I ad pitairrO k !,eitgoof Assididiskissik • • , . • •• • s. ::.Ai ...,• •• :ye .1. • • -pia unus powerfkr reason was Illec SRC*2I Or In , Avi- re y a lar-maniaticiVic4;,4.'ealera and 24pmeo, Nov. 15, at . , • e• , , . „4„,,•-g 01 , c 05 . .,,e vi. soo s, i„, ; , : 0a5t0.u,.. as 4wvtvis r at t5,,,5,,0,,,d, . r..lA'Al c al 01 .toe common rules of the Court; the pleb a ih:,, - A 14 .,,,,,,i,"hir, own, ttarosaret t: 1/..iaiceillbary. . • tilt ft.al a right to marshal his "Cause. - ft . the trials at Altiolli ksidts:zi' et it 0 1 2't-ii lurk-sietes earela•si 3 ,ters killer tsar wire to be postponed so the argument. it was Dorsetskire—Edward Greathead, of Udden, Esq.; Thomas Hun. loCk Bastard; of Char Von Marshall, Esq.; Francis Wm. Ss•Aty ler, of WOolland,Esq. t• Esseist—Sir.Robert Wigrftp, of Walthathatovr, Ban.; Charles Smith, of.Stittons„Esq.; and John Marmaduks Grafton Dare, of Cratibrook, Esq Gloucestershire--Sir Wns. Hlcks, of WhitcombeParkLartl .; Ro• heft Gordon, •of Kemble, Esq.; and William Hunt :riga, of Chariton Kings,-Esq. Herefordshlre—Sir Hungerford Hoskyosi of Harwood, Dr.; Pim lip -Jones, of 4ugwas, Esq.; and Thomas lan of Dernd,ale, Esq. Hurt furdshire.—R obert Taylor,' of Taltinores, Esq.; Nilin Currie, of Easvndeii,E6q.; and l'homas.Gatild, of Dlortbaw, Esq. Kentos-atudrew Hayes Bradley, of Gore Court, Esq.; Sir 'ohm Courtnertioney wood, of Evlngton, Bart.; and Join Wells, pf Brickley,' Esq. , I.Elchstershire—ltithard•Normatt, of Melton Mowbray, Esq., Rtgiert.Hayncrs, of Great Glenn, Esq.; and John Clarke, of Williston Magna; E'q. Lincolnshire—Joseph Livesey, of Bauzuer, Esq. ; Sir John lieol• lope, of Caswick, Bart. ; and the Ifen. Peter Rokert Drum tnot:d Binnell, of Grainsthorpe Castle. Monituthinire—Hugh Powill, of Llaovihangel, Eu. • Charles Lewis, .of Saint Pierre, Esq.; and John Haztu;nonti ' Prichard, cl Caerleon, Esq. Norront.--Chat les Lucas, of Filby, Esq.; 'John Turner Hales, of llardingham, Esq ; ° and Thomas French Btruey, of Beacon Ash, ' _ • Northamptonsbire--Walter Strickland, of Drixworth Hall, Isg. ; ' Peter Drays, of Easton Nissan, Esq.; and Robert Willis Bleu- Powe, 0E1;411h/rim, Esq. trortliumberiand—Williarn Bartell, of Broome Park, Esq ; John Carr; of Hedgilry, Esq. ; Edmund Craster, of Preston, Nottioraltimshire—Thontas . Wright, of Norwood Park., Esq..; William Charlton, of Chliwell, Esq.; and John Hall, of War sop, F. OstOrst.ftiees.—SV Shipitancs Wirt Frastaiskak•• silk l.luyd Whvatv, of Glynapton Park, Esq . .; Wan. WON" of Nether Wharton, Esq. • • !.,Pot; Ru t land IN:lre-111e Hon. George Watson, of Rockinghaus Cash; Get rani Novi Noti, of Exton, Esq.; Stafford O'Brien, eta*. • ton, Eaq. • Shropshire—George Brooke, of Naughton, Esq. • Wm. Owen, of Woodhouse, Es+ • Sir Cerb.. Corbett. of Adtk:rley Hall, Bt. Somersetshir..4-34 , tin i.eigh, of tourthay, Ea.q.; Sir Wm. Coital Mucilycuit, of Vet 5,43%.; John Hubert Hunt, of Compton l'aunctfurt, Esq. Stattord.ddie—rantes Beath, of the Shaw, Esq.; Walter Sneyd, 'of Keel, El. • JOhn Fenton Boughey, of Ay halate, Esq. County of Souteuinipton—Sir Robert Kinpeuttl, ut Sidmonton, • Ban.; Tbomis Thistlethwalte, of Southwick, Esq,; ticorip Eyre, of Brantshaw, Es+ Suffolk—Robert Ovule/ail, of linhorough,El+; Richanlllifoore s " of Melford, Esq.; George Wiliob, of Redigtost4ll44. • " • 1 Surfer —George Tritton, of Wandsworth, Esq.; T homas Stir.' ling Benson, of Cha m pion Lodge, Esq. ; KWry.Szidllegs of Iw ell, Isq. Ibanez—Win. . Dounington LAW m'ELLioprcE. Chetwynd, WArwick,l l .,. Wilathire-4gry AVourt, 6' Wnetesterstairts • HOOliri ) ci r t MARRIED. Last wer.k, at St. George's, Hanover-square, J. F. Sapid, EM of Pahter-strert, to Mi... Rlindet.,dauf Ater of 4. R butter. Eeq. I,'" . .1110 Wf I.IIJI ......e• reason for bringing forward the lisistex—Wsn.Plltver, of Angmerilig, Esq.; Wm Dearling, of Dounington, ESq.; Jamesoßaker, of North Chapel; Esq, demurrer. It was mit.nc.cessary f IVirwlchthirez—Francls Newdigare, of/Arbury, Esq.; St tieorge. lion of privilege, because that Chetwynd, of utiatton, Dart. ; Charles Porteo PaelsaimOd. of -raised and disposed of in the coul _ Warwick, Esq. the trial, or upon tile motion wNsbir,-4.4.7 Bins, of Stoekton,Etq.; Sli. Wialkilleree - .. _ .. 0 , . Ash AX:(Ari, of Heytesbory, Bt.; Wm. Fowle,ot Clizt Esq. avermcc. 0 !Tose the dolmen wortetterstaire —John Toliois 'of . MosvitY, ' ".ift maw ;he parties to be dissatisfied wit Howlers, ot Dudley, Esq.; &int. Hl4giaseo, lef Sak ~ ' ' F - ',. 't ilyp tftivnent ; a writ of error would F'.,rk'...lllre—.ll,einai Thurnhill; 01 Filthy, Eaq.'; " 't4 i $4 -- ,,,...'" 4 • use in another trial, the sam E r Bi ' lw r isu ""; .. " 1 '; :4' 4 4! 9iballi ' 44 -. .""" - . 77 '" ' which was pending before the Co Asustattil' kolf, •- , - -, 0.,. - t i i, ti o t typity pg r is t i t ,o z m. wlnirri • ! . onet, b ru r i a if. ta d ica d, s t or se a s si tivutet ,, givingthvir judgment, until the q c - . t. , .• • vet drapor. .. ::.-._-; N.; ,, • .. . .v,.. 1 .. , ... Winialll SilVerdefdy c itlf , , litMliets Vie', cabialtr - oment on the demurrer might ' 44/ " :14 ' 441.-4b# '•`c l' - ... ... ...-' _,.,_. t l ic ji „. , .. . . the iswes, but the priority atb . -.-: . -. sr: '. • - aafingioYFl:7-r.-: • • , -._,-:- the -orpiment en the- deniurter mac Ityriviif Charfne-Priiik„ . Viailmt;, trtnk . litke.i.. dealer.: question s would be disposed ',of m 4 duiP f m° l llis p th mtk " m r" * i b er- 17 .' -."' 444 ' 14 ' e :" . ;s i ' trials'. "-if in the trial at bar a ye oite,'at Guildhall. AtiorseAllip 1 - I.7.4Aatiik,Plarsa.4llolqo9l . A ii i cktvent ., l , i4 . 4 . h. .. • -., • . ). • , , .4g . it Kr. Coleman), the qtregtie wtiiiiiii w 5 64. &Mei- . ' - I ' r ;,, Itte '°""'-.414,.. error - could be applied 'rid '41124.0ta1i0, Noe : 11, .t . A Fll if , ' .41111004 , 1111rittaimst the plaintiff, thi 7.04 1 .41,110rDiviii ists,sori• Willi "4= 4 4# 4 4ll.****. ~ ' ll g ai ke n d . .agam bn the roOtionto en 4avendish-square. ._ . .k. '. ';.,,i, ..5. 4 *.•_,.' 'i•s !-. ,_! •- • In Lee, At I..dtvticePa'... ' ' ro , . tiff. Why then, waa it ate . .'t loan, I)Pc , :mb.:r in po, . . . . ..si. . . .b question decided) rather hi dlureht . .laiii, Tisterton. 'Artirritillit,MtL)4l ' '. uli!Mt. "Abbott, than in that of Burdett 2 ..sr.-Mientl.:ll, Tivertonilloo*. ."t ".'.: ' ..r" :. • ! .117 the practice of the Court, the ',,.tick Cling, of Churchiellote, Clem 41.badon, and BT N o ttingham place, CrAllift rcial-road.i . x, Merchant, to nrirsh ill the proceedings. TI 4 ,,,,,.,. „,d c b ar n alt , Nestelft v e 11, .si;•ndl::!K er 25, at repon why the argument, by Cou ten, at Guildhall. Annowit Mr, llarkei,ligiuh.ori,k-eouri, cede. the *Trial by Jury: The . • , . .- . - '"-- :' ' -.; ~.: ; 1 ' -- - . - , - 7 37 1"7 . 7 .1 7 .-. . ,` 7 7 . '" 7 7. 3 ";, ,-7 •: 7 -7 —' ''''."- . 71 - 9"" ; :r.; ...-::' - V .-'' . -‘,' ' r :. - -.. 40, 1-6 24 .7 ra-7- --• .„. . , , . '• , i . • , - --i • • ~ , . . , • ~,. . . ~. • . - . • • .•. • . •••. '• , ,:. • %., :. :? a se- . ..`S'N•N . '''. . • . - —.‘ * ...- -Allier t h 4's , ' ••• ...N. ... , • .7).2% .-.. . Is..r. : • . . ...., - PIUMIRMIIMMIIIII=3taIitheir ' abet 111111;iill; tbi: 46 . 11 4 1411664 5 , _9 it 0 94) Aitt ".- ‘- . y .:4 l' ,• • • • V 1 ... . tli - . . 'ROII LAsT:NICITI"S G.AZII.I:TE. A 4 tOrnivii 4 1 4.r* DOWit Pgr!fiilOard SC0 4114 0; • ', t t * .. ' tinighLlic . ....._. itt cknlttt tistifP 1 • . Ictattire v 'Telmlei Lopdov, . . 1 Oil till Easter . Tt. . 7 ... 1.111,' Miernerrialitalt. tile% , PRINCB OF WALES ' S COUNCIL. _ •illiettry 144 v. of Eristol. eorgaiteer,: dtai)Ef and eaapdia,: 'kW. i • • NO V EidLlilt It 1810.' • le,'es, and Dec. 15, at e'er :' ..itenttner Tavern, ALI posed to brlnglorward - ifte argunient for._ ; die deinui..- !. Sitoes-lane, Bristol. Atto Sweet yid Stakes, reron Tuesday or ;PAW. 119 04' Wet Cotimet toe ;NTT or COR NWAL L. —The-names of those Wito --- gur.,,B.e.b.vgalks, ia.r 1 . . , 'on; or M r. Ethsiard '. the plaintiff•wohld only say, that they were prepared for Sheriffs by thq, Council of his . ' SiePhelle. Bri!toL. • . . sezit;Taitaivr, r, a K lb r it ree t: Chiap,i d e , Lou . for every thing that was necessary within the rule% of i Highs the Prince of Wales, at his Royal itiZi r rd i t i . e But the plaintiff had a right to say, if he leti'll Council Chamber, Socneriet- plate, on - . .• d ' aiti va ls w;:li f ov Manc .l . 7 llesti oi t t r ,;:: ra D ec . rvill° r, ' tors, un, lac- . the Court. 5, at tea, pleased, that. he keas--ncit p repared. The 'l...earned _• ..._ . . ..., _, _ .... al.,- /2 fa L. e .....a. .... . .. .• .• .r-SE-i.- IL f......... Wat at.; aft I 4 nit nn and Whit__ , 0 „_:-....• "e• nel I • ,1...1 h,, meteiner_ AA t I.ltr. THIP car MK,. I . .st . ppears to have acted been totally illegal, the pliiintitf • tart: . 4i9-4, but at thenitinvefinfentar rellll9t, by air PriPrig" r i L a gte 4 ii io t i th ury. a .. ela l im ac fo tie r th inC e rei delnt ild iriet ."l4 l:ftitC geil°r d .ec tlie n i e h s c ' in the lit* instance all iikCnnienience niicriiiietiitiiiti tics Tr: ll ,, t . ; th a l: r e ; u 4 l l7 . lll4' appoi s during tit. COULSC or MOM than au years, that hr has had the caa• by ducting of ati iitteniva ,isle of the above mine, and the prig domer'ti lis will' be Ovechuled • the path for furtheilietteelf toll be ei ._,....__, ..P. sio . ..... . s . to 96; Si. ,Albarei-istretit, Pali-Mall ; the Toy-shop, No. 1 0 .; .7, I.'. clear 4Q 0 iancl. use Court nnesobiirassed fore-atiert ; ::Mt. DigkeOheyles, tio: - V, Fish-Order- 109, 1".. iitomit, at the Pe .. sicle 3 b ir . iikt to the 'ultimate • todisoit'stliich Wit= ' 'be ta .i, L A ti.k.....;‘ , A.,: t.,„_j , • • T Deees___TT 41Plioaite the Monument ; attilby one Ptrson in every co! .... :•....r 1111 M r. suw-al. • - -.'MVllPtiosi b e 3 eit ,,bi ttd , ~._, ttte town in Eo g itoid, AC: in' Habra of only .2 9.1. each, lewd ; f 1 M nOae, swhether a ''t64ll'nfitect -: 14x • 11 ' 4 fel" " 44*l"' " 44 "" e4 ‘ ;:v"mittl ' T vers.ni a dft'"rses tinuAlre sof curt themeelvia with rain and seamy. ... (i ' l MI T" At°U./Crt./t.l;lQoaf r iiiii .. f4oinFt4. it the .. *B. hvere box vo)d hl t;rt•st Betain is 4 11 1- 411 9 w ii ", ag i s*l'?' 7' . . plaktitite tiiintkii, wha.now resists istoopplicsltion v ee: • '41 ,- whicg; littiveuratlillettlartiOttn;mt , tli niller4 3g di': --- iiii; Crsideri the•cAse, be • w ;11 see that our 3..oraiminz-it - Vilee " .r... 1 . 4 / 4 "r* NJ-Ps Ntw lirliat!'street:." imitat e w a r4 s v e in t g o im el o re im pett 4ii‘ux.et sat:c it. :7 1.0 '• zl.i.4k r• bi, en: 4l ; e • : etc - and — -luthl,bvti by tEvia. st % " 11 , AfPi only rye 'ef ativ.in -hi • •. —_. liP &Poi', and ail (Atm arr eautterfrit. • Cone;etetSi :b. ee,p . ui'alio a great t _ - . N i . lg .' k filtliee ;* AY ilt. Gine ft the prior Acclaim . *4 ,be • •Sasa.oaaluais, tanyl‘.l4:l, and Ns. 1. Oatergi". IEY2 ' I. uga 1 7 - 5 Ma WO Mc II II Mimi or& cool owl 6111 1 0... Idal'al IL al J deo L' sot :iki ::