Star. — London, England, 1822-06-17 00:00:00

. . LAW INTELLIGENCE. !~ . s% COURT OF KlNOli BENCH, JUNE ie.. THE APOTHECRRIEs ' OODSPRNT V. ROSY. This was an action brought by the Apothecaries' Company to recover the penalty of ceo from the de. fendant, for practising . as an apothecary without having previously obtained his certificate from' the Court of Examiners. The action was founded on the 20th section of 55 George 111. c. 194, which enacts, " That if any person (except such as are then actually practising as such) shall, after the Ist day . of August, 1815, act or practise as an apothecary without having first obtained his certificate as directed by the Sta tute, he shall forfeit £20." At the trial it was clearly proved that Mr. Roby had 'recently practised as an' apothecary, and that he had passed no examination ; but it was contended on his behalf that he was within the exception of the Act, having practised as an apo thecary previous to the Ist of August, 1815. It ap. Feared that he had been apprenticed when young to a surgeon at Kenilworth, with whom he served three years, during the latter part of which time he had the care of the poor of several parishes, and attended the patients of his master with a skill and success scarcely to be expected from his age. At the end of this time his master died, and after living a short time with his successor, he came to London, where his father and brother then resided. As his family were rather in reduced circumstances, he attempted tb avoid be coming a burden to them by attending patients on i his own account; and it was in proof that he attended several, who received considerable benefit from his services, and to whom he sent in bills, which they raid ; but he had no shop or st ore of dre g s. T h is lasted for a few weeks previous to the 24th of July, 1815, when he obtained a situation as assistant to a Medical Gentleman at Chatham, which he filled en the Ist of August mentioned in the Act. On this. evidence the Lotto CHIEF JUSTICE expressed a strong opinion that the defendant had not shewn any acts amounting to the practice. contemplated in the except-. ing clause ; but he did not leave - this to the Jury, be cause he thought that in order to claim the benefit of that clause, he must shew that he was practising, not before only, but on the Ist of August, 1815, which he clearly was not, as he then was in the ser vice of another, the Jury, therefore, being directed to this effect by his Lordship, sound a verdict for the plaintiffs. Mr. Colmoti SEHJEANT, in last Easter Term, obtained a Rule to shew cause why a new vial should not be granted, on the ground that this direction was wrong. Against this Rule, Mr. ScARLETT now sheaved cause. 1 here was not, he contended, any evidence, of a practising which ought to have been submitted to the Jury. He would put it on the plain ground of common sense, whether a lad, scarcely 17 years of ane could gravely be regarded as a practising .aapo thecary, because he had mixed up a few medicines? defendant had no shop, which the very deriva tion of the name apothecary imported ; no physician had sent him prescriptions ; but he had done little more than what almost every •youth from five years old to fifteen had performed. Surely it was fitting that some skill, some education, some expelience. should be required before very young men were suf-, fered to practise this dangerous and delicate professirn. Mr.. 6 unsim, on the same side, urged, thatif such a practising as that now relied on were erfficiesit to dispense with the examination nnw required by the Act, a great number of unqualified persons might tamper with the public health, in palpable evasion of the . wite regulations of the statute. iilr. Casasect., also for Ole Apothecaries' Com pany, argued that,. in point of 12w, the direction of the Lori Chief Justice was right; and that, there. fore, the question whether the defendant had prac tised before the Ist of August? was properly with drawn from the consideration of the Jury. Mr. Colston SEILJEANT, in support of the Rule, observed, that the Court were not now called on to give any opinion on the evidence of practice, but simply whether that evidence ought-not to have been left to the Jury. Had it been so left, he believed. in deed he was sure, that they would have decided in Mr. Roby's favour. He contended, that on a view of all the clauses of the-Act, it would appear tb-be the intention of the Legislature to exempt any one who was practising before the Ist of August from its operation, and that the Court would not incline to extend its construction, in a case where the ruin of a most meritorious individual would be the consequence of an unfavourable decision. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE suggested a doubt, whe ther an infant could practice at all. Supposing any lad of seventeen were now to do what Mr. Roby did at the same age; could any one say that he made himself liable to the penalties of this statute? M Mr. COM ON gERJE.4 lam afraid the Apo thecaries Company would say so, my Lord." The LCttD CIIIEF JUSTICE.—" I cannot hear im putations on the Apothecaries Company, who have only acted in the discharge of a great public duty in bringing this action." Mr. CObINION SER.JEANT." At least, the instance they have selected is unfortunate. Here is a young man, whom their own witnesses describe as having rendered them essential benefit, proceeded against in a manner which must destroy all his prospects iu life, if it succeeds." , The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE,—" Really these z•eflec tibias must not be cast. Were we to allow them, we should lend ourselves to defeat the object of a Moat beneficial law. lam more anxious to stop them, lest they should have an operation on my mind, which I do opt desire." Mr. CoSISIoN SKRJEANT.— " Your Lordship would not,-1 am sure no Judge would, permit his displea sure at anything an Advocate might offer to affect his opinion on the case of the client." The LORD CRIES JUSTICE.—" Certainly not, if I can help it, Mr. Common Serjeant." Mr. COMMON SERJEANT proceeded to combat the objectioO suggested by the Court, which he had now heard for the first time. Surely, if an infant per formed a cure by his skill, he might sustain an ac tion for his services ; and if he professed to apply me dicines without skill, he was liable to an action en the case, though not to an action founded on the pro mise. At all events, the Court would not decide the case on this very nice point of law, without hearing r argument. LORI) Coles . JusTwa, after conferring with other Judges, said, that as the case was of con. case Or. further The the oih 54 •.~ W - v" utterable importance, the Coast would tate consider it; and if they were of opinigp in favour of the defendant on the other points, goor would hear further argument before'they decidgdisgatt bier the ground of his infancy. • • TAN KING V. WADIMIOTOIA • The defendant, who was remanded for a v. Mr. Justice BATLIY, appeared in Court to plead to the information filed against him for a libel on the Chrlitian religion. On being required to plead, he said that he had committed no crime, and began to address the Court. The LOUD ClilliJerricx—You must only say whether you are guilty or not guilty? The Defendant—l em certainly hot guilty. I have some secrets to tell your Lordship. The Loan C.rtar Justsca--Well; we cannot hear your secrets now. Have you bail? The Defendant—My Lord, I had bail here, bat they are tired with waiting, and have gone away. Will your Lordship have the goodness to inform me the amount of bail required, and to allow it to be taken at Chambers, as it is extremely inconvenient to my friends to wait in this Court. The Loin Cate James—We propose that you give emeriti for your appearance, yourself in Ina and two curette" In NA each, which may be done at the Chambers. The defendant pleaded not guilty, and received notice of trial for the Sittings after this Term. He then exhibited an affidavit, and requested that it might be read. The Loan Cm's, Janice—What is its object? What is it you apply for ? You must tell us the motion you intend to make before we can hear your affidavit. The Defendant—My Lord, lam an Englishman ; and if I am to be subject to the English laws, I have a right to their protectior. The Loan Cuter Jortsca—Englishman or foreigner you must comply with the forms of the Court, and tell us what you wish us to do, before we hear your affidavit. The Defendant—l wish that your Lordships would direct that I may see my friends in the prison, and not be obliged to con verse with them through the iron bars, as if 1 were a felon. The Loan Cmxc Jcsuca—We never interfere in this way with the regulations of a prison; and we cannot treat your case differently from that of any other individual. The Defendant—My Lord, this is extremely hard on me, I am innocent : I have not yet been tried. The Loan Cuiev Jessica—No, you have not : but we cannot give directions beforehand how a prisoner shall be treated. ha deed, as you are to be bailed, it is of very little importance. The Defendant-. But you have not even heat dmy affidavit read. Iwas told by one of your Lordships that I could not make a motion without an affidavit, and now I have made one you will not hear it. Who is to pay me for my affidavit stamp? It is downright picking of pockets. The Loan Carer Jusrmx—We cannot hear such language. Mr. Justice 13.tvt.xv—I told you that you could not make any motion without an affidavit, but it did not follow that with an affidavit you might move anything. The Defendant—But my Lord— Mr. Justice Barter—WM you hear me? if you have gone tta • the expense of this affidavit upon a misapprehension of anything which 1 have said, I will take care that you shall be no loser. My clerk will pay you for the stamp. The defendant then retired with his affidavit. Mr. Justice BAYLEY'S clerk followed him out of Court, and put some money into his hands. The defendant found there was a shilling beyond. the (Nice of the stamp, as.d said," That was what I wanted," and went away in custody, apparently much gratified by this last piece of success. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. JUNE IS. ASSAULT IN UYDE PARK.—CURLING V. lIATDOCK. This was an action tried at the sittings after last Term, and brought by the plaintiff, who is a respect able Physician at the west end of the town, to recover compensation in damages for in assault committed by the Jefendant, an Officer in the Lancers, upon his son, a young Gentleman under age, in Hyde Park, under circumstances of great aggravation. A verdict was found for the plaintiff—Damages, 42700. Mr. Seijeant PELL this day moved for a Rule to chew cause why this verdict should not be set aside, and a new trial granted—first, upon the ground of I excessive damages ; next, upon the ground that facts had been stated in opening the case to the Jury, cal culated strongly to prejudice their minds, which had not been subsequently proved; and lastly, upon cer tain affidavits, of which he was. iii possession, calcu lated to throw a new light on the subject. The Learned Counsel commsmced by observing on the effects which vrcre often produced on the minds of Juries by the manner in which cases were opened, and by the introduction of topics which were calcu-1 lated to inflame their minds--topics which, although not subsequently supported by evidence, or alluded to by the Learned Judge in his summing up, but too often left an impression which could nut be I emoved. Such, he conceived, had been the case in the present instance. His Learned Friend had stated that the defendant had, subsequent to the assault of which he had been found guilty, written a challenge to the plaintiff, and thereby very much added to the insult which had been already sustained. To support this assertion, however, his Learned Friend had called no witnesses, and had in that respect, he thought, acted with a degree of unfairness which was not justifiable, but which, he had no doubt, greatly tended to en hance the amount of the damages recovered—da mages which, under all the circumstances, he could not but think enormous. Three witnesses were called for the plaintiff, one of them certainly a most respect able man, a Mr. Potter. This Gentleman had stated, that on the day in question he was in the Park at the time the assault took place. He saw the defendant and another Gentleman standing by the railings:— they were talking very loud. The son of the plaintiff rode leisurely up towards the place where witness stood, and immediately afterwards be observed the defendant make towards him,saying 44 That is enough," or " that is sufficient ;" and, overtaking him, be took hold of him by the leg, upon which he fell from his horse, and when he was down the defendant horse whipped him with great severity. In cross-examina tioa, witness said the plaintiff lifted up his coat, and that there was some allusion made by the defendant as.to its having been done before. The next witness (Mr. Bowden) saw the transaction, hut added nothing to the facts already stated, and the last witness Vas a titan of the name of Byrne, who stated that he had seen the defendant sitting on the railbefore the plain tiff came up, and as a Lady was passing on horse back, appeared to be imitating her attitude, evidently intending to insult her : he added, that he heard the defendant say "he had come out with his horse-whip, and was determined to use it before he went home." Now, if this could be believed, certainly there was 'nothing which could be urged in favour of the de. feridant which could extenuate his conduct. It was not probable, however, that an Officer and a Gentle man could have been guilty either of such unmanly conduct, or have made a declaration so much at va riance with the ordinary decorum of society. He must have been mad or drunk if such things bad happened, but he denied that this evidence was consistent with truth. Only one witness had been called by the dr fondant (Mr. Bray), and this was the Gentleman whO up . flaps _ cantering the gate, as if for the express purpose of iasultiig them. This certainly did irritate the defendant, been described followed. Wyss he was persuaded that these acts were meant /11101 k to offend him, it was not probable that= fendant would have been irritated to the, sion of that which, under other circumstancesp'w.dbh tier tub be deservedly characterised as a 'violent ou - bes dependent of the reasoning on the subject , and of the largeness of the damages, he was preps with affidavits, which he would read, and which he thought would still more strongly entitle the defend ant to a reconsideration of his case. The Learned Serjeant was then proceeding to read the first affida vit, which was made by the defendant himself, but to this the Court objected, as it could not be received as evidence. He then read two other affidavits—the first from the servant of the defendant, averring that he had met the witness, Byrne, at Margate, after the assault, and that Byrne had told him he had been present at the affair in Hyde Park, in which ids mas ter was concerned, and that he could swear the de fendant had been grossly insulted by the plaintiff be fore he had committed the assault, and further offer ing to become a witness for the delendantrm the event of a trial. The thiid affidavit was from Henry Humphries, clerk to the attorney for the defendant, stating that he had made diligent inquiry for Byrne, to subpoena him on the part of the defendant, but could not find him, and that he did not know it was the same man who had spoken to the defendant's servant, and promised to give evidence in his favour, until after the trial had been concluded. Under all these circumstances, the Learned Serjeant expressed a hope, that with a view to the justice of the case, as well as in fairness to the defendant, who was naturally anxious for the protection of his character, inde pendent of the very preposterous amount cf da mages, the Court would feel the propriety of submit ting the facts to a second tribunal. The Colas JUSTICE said, that whether the damages in the case were excessive or not, he was not called upon to say, because that was not his province, but the province of the Jury. At the same time, when he said this, he desired not to be misunderst ood. He was not one of those who would for ever maintain the absurd principle, that no case could exist in which a verdict might not be set aside, merely be cause a Jury had given damages. There could, and. might' be cases where a verdict ought to be set aside for excessive damages; but then those damages must be so outrageous, as, on the first statement of the facts, to appear against all justice.—The Learned Judge then proceeded to state to the Court the view which he had taken of this case on the trial, and the points which lie,had felt it his duty to submit to the consideration of the Jury, who were unanimously or opinion that the verdict ought not to be disturbed, and the Rule was cocsequently refused. The Gaelic Chiefs were excessively proud of their rank and prerogatives. When the first Marquis of IIuNTLy, then the Chief of clan GORDON, was pre sented at the Court of JAMBS VI. he did not so much as incline his head before his Sovereign. Being asked why he failed in this point of etiquette ? he replied, that lie had no intention whatever of chewing any dis respect to his King, but that he came from a country where all the world were used to bow down befute him. Again, when GEORGE 11. offered a patent of Nobility totheChief of the GRANTS, the proud Celt re fused it, saying," Wha would then be Laird of Grant?" The Marquis of HERTFORD was yesterday so dan gerouily ill, that scarcely any hope of his recovery was entertained. Tuesday evening, a Meeting was held- in White row Chapel, Portsmouth, on behalf of the Baptist Irish Society, the Rev. C. PRITCII A RD, of London, in the Chair. The Meeting was addressed by several Ministers and other Gentlemen, in a very impressive manner. From the statement of the Chairman, it appears that 30,000 children and adults have been instructed by this Society. There are at present 90 Schools, containing 7,000 children. The Society em ploys a number of penons as readers of the Irish Scriptures, and others to preach the Gospel in the Irish language. Monday last the vicinity of Canterbury was visited by a thun der storm of a singularly awful character. About six in she even ing the electric matter, which during the afternoon had been gathering, drew up from the south, extending nearly to tbe west, in a cloud so dense and black u to darken the atmosphere, and render artificial light necessary, in most situations. A gust of wind shortly succeeded, followed by torrents of rain, during which the electric matter discharged itself in an alternate suc cession of vivid Sashes of lightning and loud peals of thunder, the reverberations of which were continued, almost without in terruption, for nearly an hour, impressing on the mind the idea of a distant but tremendous cannonade. After passing over the above City, the storm went off towards the east and north east: at Woodchureh much damage was done; at Bsthersden it blew a hurricane, and large pieces of ice fell in great quantities. The mansion of Sir E. Cholmeley Dering, at Surrenden, suffered severely; 1036 panes of glass were broken in the house and offices, besides which the grape and green-houses were Vaunt entirely destroyed. At Sandway, near Lelham, the hail -stones were as large as walnuts, and the hat of a boy was cut through from one of them falling upon it. Though the lightning was so extremely vivid, fortunately no person was materially injured. MELANCHOLY ACCIDENT.--Yesterday afternoon, about five o'clock, a Mr. CLIPSTON2 went into the Surrey Canal to bathe, and shortly after, it is sup. posed, was seised with the cramp, as he disappeared ; his friend, a Mr. Jonas, went in immediately upon witnesag his precarious situation, and while.be was swimming towards the spot where-Mr. CLIPSTONS sunk, Mr. JONSII . B son went in after his father, and disappeared almost instantly. Mr. JONES, sea. with much difficulty reached the shore. Mr. CLlParons's body was shortly after taken up, but that of Mr. JONES'S son was not found till late in the evening. lIEBDOMA DARY. Monday, June 17.—Si. Aibin.—The Sun rises at 17 minutes before four, and sets at 17 minutes after eight. Tuesday—The Moon in Perigee, or that pan of her orbit least distant from the earth. Wednesday—New Moon St 211 minutes before seven in the morn big; Venus, a morning Star, rises about a quarter before two. Thursday—Translation of Edward, Ring of the West Sanas. Friday—The evening twilights meet till nearly the end of July, before which time there wine no real dullest's. Saturday-1 1 s Sono* day. The Ben enters Cancer at *any minutes triter one in the mornbig. . . Jobs Be* . Taylor, ditto. . Bac Rickard Henry Miut ft worth, ditto. Bevoßdurard Atkyns Bray, 'MOOT Coakley Bev. Idwasd Hawell, St. John's College. 3103101141 Y MIMS 07 ASS& The Hon. Dawson Massy, Trinity College. mamma or AILTS. Henry Burnaby Green, Corpus (Altai Cuble•' Adam pits-Ades, Christ College. • aseameas, DI CIVIL SAW. Henry Bennett, Trinity College. Millen Cohost, 'Nulty Hall. seesisson 1x TIMM George Penske, St. John's College: 07 A/10. Edward Ldwe, Se. John's College. The Rev. Temple Chevalier, M.A. Fellow and Tuft of Cal' 'tberine Hall, was on Tuesday elected Lectiarer of Great St. Ah..' draw's Parish, in this town, cm :he resignation of the Rev. Juke' naivete& • The following 4endemdn of this University were ordained by the Bishop of Gloucester on Sunday se'nnight K. Geld 'ney, B.A. and J. Jarrett, B.A. of St. Johe's College; and N. T. Rope, B.A. of Corpus Christi College.' OXFORD, JUNE IS. Tuesday, Mr. Francis &smell Mien and Mr. Henry Thorp, were elected Scholars of St. John's College; and Mr. Gerard Edward Smith was elected one of Dr. Andrews's Law Exhibi tioners of the same Sudety • The Rev. Thomas Silver D.C.L has been nomi na t e d by t h e President and Fellows of S t. John's College, to the Vicirage of Great Stoughton, Huntingdonshire. Thursday, Mr. Aitey, Mr. Rootin i and Mr. Dyles, Scholars of Queen's College, were elected Taberdars of that Society, um the Michel Foundation. The MUM day, the following Degrees were conferred: aunts' Ctl , AIM Rev. John Hilton, University College, Grand Compounder. Rev. George l'eake, Merton College. Rev. Charles Eckereall, Corpus Christi College. William Whitmarsh Phelps, Scholar of ditto. William Ring, ditto. Edward Trey Richards, ditto. Rev. Edward Whrrtn Caulfield, Qoren's College. ltev. John llamptykle Damell, Christ Church. SACHL4OIB Or Anis. John Alexander WiWon, Queen's College. William Airey, Scholar of (ZOOM'S College. henry Rooki44ditto. Joseph Ballantine Dykes, ditto George Deane, St.•Alary Hull. Peter Pering, Oriel College. Henry Palmer and William Horne, Christ Church. George It. M. Ward, Matthew Carrier 'fompson, and iienry Allen, Trinity College. • ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTIONS. Rev. G. R. Cleig, perpetual Citrate of Ash, Kent, to the Rectory of Ivy Church, void by the resignAtfou of the Arch deacon of Canterbury. ltev. William Heury Deane, B.A. to the Rectory of Made sham, Suffolk. Rev. Joseph Gibson Wballey, M.A. to the Rectory of Witne chant, Suffolk. Colonel and Mrs. Beaumont have presented the Bev. T. Scurr, Muter of Ifeaham School, to the _Living of Alkndde, Northumberland. • r• • - ' - ' l •wfr - '•"Trr': ' F7 N F.' r : F :"'r7"M" • - —4lll Prir l !"" C l r i l Tl i .... 1 1 , 1 17 % . . 1 7. , - -----'- , . , . . •e• • •.- . . • . . . - . - • . . e time to had atempinlectiiist as dittro• 4 obillarl'' lit m uNtibrimmy rztuiauct • • -- favo u r of Bray stated . that they had been dinirig with a frietia • ---. • ' CAltillelDG it, JUNE 14. Mild hear in the neighbourhood, and That they hai come out to at a ea Tasad It hint on take a walk in the Park ,- being perfectly sober ; chi; . warred 8 ay bst„ DOCTOR ill ililTillO. • the plain;iff had passed them three several times 01 Catawalik iSawet . t. 8.4. Downing Professor of itins. horseback, each time lifting up his coat in a clog MCI/MORS Di DLTITIT* t week by offensive manner, and on the last occasion liftin Bay. Ago Lusk Wow of Corpus Chaiat Callelik. plead to up both flaps of his coat , and canterinf throug h ev. =af m' 4Gr aEmmanuel roar~ ' nes jani i , tor la -- - • mirrils. At Portrack, on the sth inst. ti.e Lady of Alexander 11at1.4 Maxwell, Esq. of a snn. Monday, at Ashprington House, the Lady of Majnr-Gener.l Adams, of a son. At Edinburgh, on the 3d inst. the Lady of Major A. Alack.-.y, of a daughter. M 11 H TED. Saturday, at St. Pancras New Church, Mr. Ilighley, of 1 7 kt-- street, to Miss Anne Mkt's, of Charlotte-street, Fitzroy-squat:, daughter of the late Mr. John Miers, of the Strand. At St. James's Church, Piccadaly, the Rev. W. Williarnt, B. D. of liascontb, Surrey, to Ms Sophia Ann Catherine Law ford, of the former parish. The Rev. William Drayton Carter, of Abingdon, Berk; to Emma Kingham, daughter of the late Peter Ozuntlett, of Winchester. _ _ The Rey. William Durham, one of the Masters of St. Paul's School, to Aliss Itudail, daughter of Mrs. Griffith,, of l'hnlico. The Rev. Thomas Wilson Morley, of Kirklington. Yore:- shire, to Henrietta, daughter of the late Rev. Andrew Downo, Vicar of Witham, Essex. Tuesday, at St. Pancras Church, the Rev. John Lucas Sut ton, Vicar of Weekley, and Rector of Oakley Parva, North amptonshire, to Miss Bowen, of Euston-place, Xew-ro..d. Thursday, at St. Martin's-in-the-Fields, the Rev. Joseph Dur.- can Ostrehan, to Anne, youngest daughter of Robert \Vithy, Esq. of Buckingham-street. At Stradhally-, the Rev. IL Carey, Prebendary of Dranough more and Kiltegant ' to Maria, eldest daughter to Major 11u,,t1, of the King of the Netherlands' army. Thursday, at Shevioc i Lieut. Richard Vallack, R.N. of the Preventive Service at Mevagissey, to Miss Ann Ilockiu, of TrethiU. At Desertserges Church, Elizabeth, eldest daughter of the Rev. M. Longfield, Vicar of Desertserges, and Rector of the Parishes of Kilcrohane and Templenoe, county of Kerry, t) Daniel Connor, Esq. only son of Daniel Connor, of Ealing, Mid dlesex, Esq. . Iskay 25, Lieutenant Henry Jellicoe, R.N. of Wandsworth, to Jane, daughter of Sir A. B. King, Bart. of Dublin. At Camberwell Church, Henry H. Goodhall, of the East India House, Esq. to Mary, eldest daughter of Henry Smi:l a, of Peckham House, Esq.. DIED. June 7, at Sudborough, Northamptonshire, aged 66, the Rev. Sir Thomas Hewet, Bart. many years Rector of that place. At Great Brickhill, Bucks, aged 69, the Rev. A. Davies, late Lecturer of Linslade , in t hel same County. The Rev. Robert Peter, Rector of Sully, and Vicar of Penlline, Glamorganshire, aged 79. May 97, at Rhynle, Aberdeenbh aged 79. June 11, the Rev. Isaac Tozer, of Frome, late of Tooting. June 1, at Drumcondra, Dublin, the Rev. Joseph Fitzpatrick. On the 6th inst. while at Bath (whilst engaged to supply for the Rev. W. Jay),the 11ev. Samuel Newton, who for more than 36 years had been the Pastor of the Protestant Independent Church at Witham. Tuesday se'nnight, at Shrewsbury, Mrs. Jones, relict of the Rev. John Jones, Rector of Hanwood, Shropshire. The 9th inst. at Walton-upon-Thames, Elizabeth Mary Be resford, aged 13, second daughter of the Hon. and Rev. Wm. and Lady Anna Bereaford. June 4, at his house in Chelsea, aged 76 years, fifty-eight of which were spent In the service, Captain Alexander Sutherland , of the late Ist Staff Garrison C ompany. Thursday morning, at the White Friars, Canterbury, William coachman to General Ramsay. He fell suddenly in a ht while walking in a hop-ground near Dane John Farm, be tween nine and ten o'clock on the preceding evening, and conti nued in a senseless state till kt expired. Friday se'nnight, in his lath year, John Hardisty, of High Harrogate, better known at that watering-place tet the name of (AVMs. He had the care of the chdjheate 4 the Rev. James Milne, MAILS TIM DUE. • 9 0 (Win Watederd fteresey aal Jersey o • 5 0 • 11111. um France 1 0 Hambnrigh • 0 0 Randers 1 0 Aimlies 0 0 Gottenbureh I 0 Leeward blends 1 0 o 1 1 0 O 0 New York HIGRAVATER at LONDON BRIPG/it TO-1110RHOW Wonting - - 0 niigutes after S ♦ninteDn - 3 reascitiftiphed by Lan lima, Midiv Flte!-4-70107arl ~ z 0) 15510 !!! - 4 1q 9 I'. r : ; 1' N ...