Star. — London, England, 1823-05-28 00:00:00

wile attempted to be detailed in the present vras'deemed quite sufficient to propose , cable measure . - for 'the consideration - ships, and hoping a beneficial result ties of the Established Church, as connected welfare of the community at large. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, that he .n. dispense with the consideration of the nullity clause cher-General had ally intention of bringing till the Bill came into a Committee. At present we rent Debtors' Aet during this Ro deo? the iolligto g. It GENERAL, as we endenteed, replied remained in some respects still under the old law , and in other respects we were under the new law.— Mr. LITTLETON presented a Petition from the Mehl- The predicted mischiefs of the latter were not percep- tants of the town of Derslem, in Ilniffordsliire, praying for an tible in its operation ; and,:aherefore, he hoped that equalisation of the duties on asear.--Brosiiir up, read, and or dared us lie on the table. 'their Lordships would consider this circumstanc e in legislating fur marriages. But the present w as an y RICOVDRY Of SMALL DEBtf. Lord ALTHORP. brow ht u thing except the Bill described by the Noble and Committee a ted to co gnsidep the Report of the ppoinr the means of faci- Learned Lord upon the Woolsack; it offer e d no full and comprehensive law. for the regulation of mkr- !kiting the recovery of Small Debts. He said that 1 slags: • it was certainly not the measure which Wes he had been pressed by letters from all parts of thel ezctid fmm •the Committee. It was h o p ed, for country,- to know what his intentions on this subject instance, that all doubts whatsoever would have been were. He was not surprised at this general anxiety, removed by a specific clause respecting the validity because, as the law now stoodi•no man could feel any of 'English marriages in foreign countries. And here satisfaction i n proceeding to recover debts under 15L. their Lordships could not have forgotten a recent Pe- One ill ionsequence of the want of Courts for the tit. tition from persons who belcinged to the Russia Com- rotary of small debts was, that a master might turn pany, and who doubted if such marriages as had. away his servant without paying him his wages, and been celebrated by the Chaplain to the Russian roc- the latter had no resource but in an action at law.-s -tory,. though according to the rites of the Church To remedy this evil the Legislature had at different . o 1 England, were valid in law. Now, although a times authorised the establiihmeht of Courts of Re- Noble and 'Learned Lord (Lord Stowell) had stated quest in different places, the Judges of which Courts were at once Judges of the law and the - faet.• Ibis most distinctly that such marriages, so solemnized, course, although well suited to populous placess'it had always been recognized in the taw Coin ts of was evident could not be suited to agricultural dis this country, it was improper that such parties tricts, were it would be difficult to find persons suited * ahould • themselves be induced to . entertain such to that office. The attention of the Committee had dolihts ; and,. therefore, they'ought to' be explained at once by some definitive clause, witheut the liarties been particularly turned to the expense of suits, and they had taken such measures as would prevent the being obliged to refer to the Law Courts here.— He could also have wished that facilities h a d been expense of travelling. It was necessary also, that some difference should be made betleen the consti accorded for the marriages of Protestant Dissenters tution of and Roman Catholics, - as it was held that all . mar- the County Court and the Court of Requests; it was therefore intended to appoint a barrister, of a ridges which happened to be solemnized by a Catho certain number of years standing, as assessor to the -lic Clergyman in this country, if not re-solemnized County Court, and that the mode of trial should be according to the ritual of the Established Church, were invalid. Another of the complaints was , that b y J ur y . A n o t her p oin t was, how that barrister should be appointed ; and the present opinion of the Commit marriages the most in:essuous, shameful, and urns- ,tat lie should be appointed by the Lord at rural; were tolerated i i certain classes; this was an ' tee was, Lieutenant of the County, upon whom the choice of intolerable anomaly in the Marriage Law, retained , in the Bill before their. Lordships , and against Which the County o ffi cers generally • fell. The subject of salary was another cousideration ; and to prevent an 'no security wits offered. With respect to the clause improper bias on the part of the assessor, it was pro protective of the rig Las of parents and guardians to posed to pay him a fixed salary from the county rates. • norm! the marriages made under age , he saw no te • curity in it, as marriages by, banns rema i n e d on the t hese were the chief points to which lie wished to draw the attention of the House. It was however his iii footing of seventy years past. Whenever a Youth tention, ittorder to make creditors vigilant in looking wished his marriage to be valid, he would marry by after their debts, that th e Statute of Limitations should banns, and conceal it from .his parents or guardians be in force in these Courts, and that the time limited. till, he bad mastered the ag,e of twenty-one. When a should be two years. He was *seine that as this re: marriage was intended to be validly good, it could rust be nullified by the Bill ; but in cases where men gulation would be entirely new, there would be some wished to betray thefairer, though weaker sex, under com p laints made against it; but its operation would the semblance of marriage, the measure would , if only be to oblige creditors to prosecute their debtors, whom they could trust, iii a less time than two years. passed; be found to operate in a manner not appre- I here was also another complaint that would be headed h e Many of those• Noble Lords who supported • it. Husbands might carry off wives into foreign made, and it was this . —that by the iasiitution of these Courts considerable business would be takers out of the parts, and we enabled to divorce them altogether. li4 wished to include the generous rights of wives; , Courts of Westminster 11411, and that coMpensation but if these were to be dishonoured and disgraced in • might be required. Ile. was deeidesiky -otrpiniqn,* their own esteem, and driven back upon a shelterless ' thaw no compensation ought to he allowed, -because • World,' their Lordships were entertaining a - measure, thought that by the p res ents ostern i cpreiderte. which degraded • the weaker party—which fell only'l ble class of persons Were denied)uitke i . and tie did on woman. It was, in effect, just that measure most : pot think that any one cotitl have a Vested interest calculated to operate as a premium on seduction, and ; ur the denial of justice; . To compensation, therefore, • rather than have expected it from the united labours ! he was a decided enemylbist he niiglirlie - Wee:finis of• Right Reverend Prelates and Noble and Learned • it, and he did- not therefore' bind' !Anise], fo • Oir'O'OP Lords; he might have viewed it as miginating with the Bill if compensation Were awarded. He had a patty of young dissolute taverners, who were pro- taken- this 'opportunity Of briefly • expressing hit siding for the marriage of sonie*Don Jnan. sentiments, because be was aware be should not have . • , .. ,: _ - The .Archbishop of CANTERBURY here into- -an opportunity oe.going- to roe* mated. his desire Unit - the Bill should stand corn- ! Bill. It was his int ention tobruig in the 8i11,..t0 diet', - mitted WV Tuisday west. - 1 its first reading, imithendeferics further preset-460a Lord ELLENBOROUUM had no dilation to until the next Se,sinti. this arrangerent. ' • .. , . .• . . 1 Mr. SCARLETT said , that at present he felt n* - The Earl of WESTMORELAND took objections 'objection to the provisions of the Dill, as itatediii, to the Bill, as shaking the security of property, and . his Hon. Friend; for he conceived that it would be' altering the lase of England: • . of gr:at public benefit.- The Noble Lord bad done 'The Bishop of CHESTER was adverse from the him the honour to state to hint the general principle nullity clause, respecting the marriages of minors, of the Bill , anti he thoughtit a'very woad one; .in the proposed Bill. This prevision was contrary ctoraisisartow LAWS. '* - • • • . both to the expressed and written Word of •Goo, Mr. LITTLETON presented a 'Petition froth the which said.' 44 Whom Goo bath :joined together, let Iron Manufacuireia of-Dudley, in the counties Ofhit.tf no man Separate." For • this Cause a man was to leave . ford and Worcester; against the Bill for regulating his father and mother, and cleave unto his wife; and differences between Mailer and Servant. He Was will . fro separation, or bill of divorce, was, under the disc ing to give credit to the IlOnourable Member Mr. pensation of Christianity, to be allowed, except f or P. Moore) for the motives ninth had induced him to adultery. Such was the law of CHRIST. But what, bring forward bit Bill ; but lie (Mr.. Littletori) thought • in effect, did the present Bill say ? - Get married by it likely to be productive of many inconveniences. banns, live together for a year s then dishonour and He would therefore recom mend the Honourable Mem desert the partner Of your bosom, and bastardize her her to withdraskrhis Bill until the next Session, and infant child. Were such sentiment it 'for a Chris- take the opinion of every class - upon it. If the Ho tian's Creed? Could such-opinions be' enacted by a nourable Member would not listen to this suggestitin, Christian Senate? * He still trusted that such conclu- he (Mr. Littleton) should feel it his duty, Sehest *Or ;Motif would never be affirnied by their Lordships, second reading was proposed, to move its sec .• '. The Bishop of KILDA It E•shought that the argu- reading that day six months. . . . . meut was lost sight of. The question was respecting Mr. P. MOORE-said that he was thaiiii t ui roe all marriages, if persons .had contracted what from Honourable Member for the objection which belied the beginning was - voidable .by law. • , stated, because his object' was to receive inforasillou Lord .ELLENBODOUGH: said, that he 'would from every quarter. But -these objections Were rather have the opinion of some Noble and I earned brought forward by the manufacturers, who were • Lord upon this subject than - the argumer is of some persons whom his measure would of act. The Ho, Eight Reeirielatesi if the latter were fOunded on notirable Member concluded at some length in fa. Ecclesiastical Law s which, too often, was neither the Tour of the Bill. He had taken it up because no qua law if GOD nor man. sow, in the present Bill, ws else had, and lie hoped that, after all thetroublethat ifistaltion was attempted to be dawn respecting had been expended upon in it would not befall". what marriages were immoral end what were not. Alr.S. WORTLEY thought the subject rret-f • 1 The LORD CHANCELLOR was persuaded that worthy 9f attention. His own experience lisid 'cio k i their Lordships must have a good deal more both of vinced him that all Acts of Combination were useless the Law of the Land and the Scripture Law, before and .that their only effect was td promouramet‘i i they could dispose with safety of the Bill. He was, workmen a desire to combine. With respect!, this therefore, for proceeding to a Committee on the Bill. present Bill, he should have no'objeetion to'agrePia' The question was put and agreed to, and the Bill it if it only went to repeal Former Acts; but I,W,klso ordered to be comuutted for Tuesday ' neat.—Ad- nourable Member proceeded to intioduce•iniioneer jourued till to-morrow.. • • .*, ' regulations which required attention. Mil bops/ HOUSE OF CoStiEbES. • therefore that the Bill *OW not be pressed. The Sesame took the Mar at GOD reelect. ' * Lord STANLEY would prefershatiftl - Bal shoe Sir IL KNATCNBULL proseeted a Padden from several be sent to a Committee up stairs, and thoste walla parishes is lietit,raylng lot a reduction babe Doty as Co s h.— • udered, and then allowed to stand over until the B ro u g ht op, reed, rrod ordered to lie an the table, sod be primed. A Maims, whose Mtn we did ant !mow, presorted a.retitiOn Session , that it might in the interim be well - eitt from certain Linen Manufacturers of the City Of Aberdeen, stood in the manufacturing world.' He watglisi pr aying for a t ota l remission attire Duties en Sulphur.—Bessielbr the subject of payment of wages formed - melba up, read, and orderld ti lie as the table. • of the present Bill. ' • Tbs' sone .Hen.ibliosess preisated.a)Petition frees *slaw . plsoe.nrayleg toe an *iriesen . attic Lieu now* the r . Mr. HUSILISSQN said, that be era - bogus' in i ns a Lifts.-...8r0 np, read, add ordered to Ifs ea the . tice IP say, that the Honottrabla hieniheef the Caries- A Message from - the Lords mummies! dam their Lordships try had been quite consistent in the .e.ollll* which bad agreed to several private MU. without easeadassati. had announces' at the beginning of'the ilassies, Mr. li'l ill DSAY preteens! a retake front . she lttasieficte rel.. of ea.ar mina the Padden heeet Lold - iiioo: 4 Famed fora a town hi the ,to a Committee up stein. He thought the Bill con- - 7m`- -~ ;.~ , .~. Lam—There were several examinatioes trim se Mere, after being sworn b the Magistrat e ... 1 -.61 recollect their belegletileled as h Ing o t kvitt. • Mittel was made I believe the emodintlike were before the Ma. gistrates ; though, from the answers,* ippeared as iftbepse eet not. According to the best of my reionection, I flikelfatiltro Major Ike what was my opinion, sod that was to commit fee ainspitall to murder. In ail eases of examination the trams were not preeent,.butgenerally, and seheti MI Were . to gado the Law Mamas to their course, but loterferesteem thelsart Of the Miebtratge• .i* stbe e***, Sr by Mr. Gobbet an the informations were seen by mim IMO leek k w s not ties mein that of Meier ger, who weemsmerahle fa k i -V he did wrong, it was without sty direction front me. By Mr. Ileteov.—Major Set never at any time orged to hid' Sit be could not mote* tin the capital Amee. Graham Meemitted in Demother, and 1 have do distinct reelliketion On 'stroke to him other than in staring it to be the opinion of the Law Officers of the Crown that these proms ought to be rapt. tally committed. Major Sire heard our opinions on the tater. day evening, and on the next Monday the commitiak were caste Ism. TM , Law Officers had coastiked as to the "Woe togs liven. but . I eatinmpartieulaely say why is Major Sirr, axdpt 'because of his residence at the thole. Th• Magistrates sp y rto the Governtnent upon this subject. The loformationstabel before the Magistrates- went laid before the Law Officers. These twee no bolding back any examination from the Magistrates which were quite aceeseible to Major Sire and every ocher M a , &trate, and I thought he would have seen them all before l it signed any efonmittel. Our opinion to the Magistrates watilhic there was evidence of the c Taal offence, end that'tbey ou g h ts , be centmitted for that ofibnce. No direction , nor lattr uct i on, other dam opinion. w ere even to the Magistrates. • By Mr. IL o. ..—Sonie of the Magietratei altd Path hold their places at the pleasure of the Crown—Mr. Gobbet* one of those Magistrates—Major•Skr bolds a patent place?—t believe not. Ey the' Dublin Police Act there are Civic and C ro wn Magistraert, the former paid by the City, and he Wow by.the Deaeary. d believe Majos flier of the latter 'clam By Dr. Lourinsmos.—The examination lasted six or scree days, and the . Magistrates, or.some one or them, was present? By Sit J. Newmaa—Couuty ?Jag's:rates applied to Inc as to phut they shduld do In cases of this nature, and I declined giving any :opinitits. • Was rise eon'rary the practice of your predecessosei—l Les rather not *newer that alusction if my lion. Friend will allow me. - Mr. GOULl3tlt - N begged to correct the answer .• given by the Attorney-Genes al, as to the 11 , tgistrates being removable by the Crown; the fact was °therein. By Mr. ban (Deblin).—After the Bills were ignored: e. • parties were held to bail2—Yes ; ma by me, but by the Cesett. - Win the Attorney-General say it is in his power to hold a pey son to kaki consequence.of an eziBrczo7—That Is a patios of law, which I do not feel called upon to ansteer. Mr. CALCRAFT - now wished to ask the Ilon. ' Gentleman. who conducted this case, whether he had any more evidence tio 41.61. ; for it was his intention to move the 'dissolutiOn • Orthe Committee? ColOnel BARRY said, he certainly had intended to examine another witness who had not yet arrived ; he, however,, felt the inconvenience to which this in. qiiiry put the House, and he could not shin his eyes against the distaste which was shewn to continue it. lie had, therefore, no objection to rest the Sheriff's case here, and to give over consuming the time of the Hottsei.ln a way which did not seem very wider. tory to the ends of justice. He should not, therefore, ivy oat the • motion for the Hon. Chairman discontiiiin ing the parallel rho ition which hehad held so long. • -Mr..DENMAN..—I. cannot stiffer this inquiry 'to close here, under an imputation that we are India,. two J..- - A.. 44. • • -• • S .O.CII .60 go 160 Liter wpm it it ono improner . d i e of our time to be employed in such a way, forl lardy no duty of this House more sacred or isbporlant t h at watching over and protecting the administration of justicii=(ilear).—Let not the Right Honourable CA- Almon therefore say, that it is to spare the timed the House that he gives over; but if he will stop here, let it be placed to the account of his best discretion for the incased party, and not in' the way of a con. -promise of an inconvenience —(Hear).—List night I Wind with some turPrise that the inquiry was come to . 1 elow, because one class of witnesses had-cones. dieted. hat another advanced; hut that issbe wry time that the judicial power begins—when there is roan to feral a judgment from the collision of en dews. Let it be distinctly understood, then, tint _the case is closed, as it was intended, to follow it in by proposing Resolutions. For-I repeat, that we eotit! not be better employed than in mach an inquiry.. though itshonld prolong the Session another yak Mr. CALCRAFT then moved-66 That the ICIOIPA man do leers the Chair, and report the evidence to the noise OiNch was agreed to. The Homeroom!. The CLIAIRMAN then leftithe chair, and reported . • sF.t. e 4104 * mold not arced ttyking 040P"' j i o li gokitis what ho belisved to be the roe A pe ;his thanks to the ifon..Baronet for die able ' impartial manner in whiclibe dikaargeilfe duties of chairmen in the tate inquiry- 7 (Heett... Mr. WYNN moved that the Minutes of She err dente be laid' before the House.-4greed It wispliltewise ordered that the witnesses shag be discharged from funber . ,atteidance.. ions? TlmliaNcT (1111L3VD). Mr. DALY moved that She Joint TooluisTP 1 b recortuditted. Mr. R. MARTIN the , op the Bay itin, • Atilt would have the tof disfranchisi ng . lilliffholicu •He tho u ght, st leaf, that the people el, Ireland :healable allowed time to express their era' Woes on thespropriety of the mean* psis l- TRENCH said, be could not agree is de l AO:don urged -by'ihe Membilr for Galway. 'The Amiss which Ibis Bill toisix to remove Was ims of a inset unreasosablo-iroloso. In his opinion tbs did. not go far enough. , Sir J. - NEWPORT said he would 'recitalist!! &ie his dippers to any measure which woold.ley vent that minute sabdivisioo of lands which 'wee* great curses of the.people.peopleof Ireland. The hehil ig, the.rtople led.to.this abuse. It was the castoni-thel to divide ( *Plum). mom • the younger Inef 11:theo" • V ali : 4 l • id salt it pining the BM would create some appre hension in the monufacturing districts, if they con-. ceived, as they might, that Government countenanc the proposed Measure. Mr. DUGDALE said, that the manufacturing dis- - trict with which he was most acquainted viewed with very considerable apprehension the proposed measure. The Bill was brought up, and on moving that it. should be read, , Mr. P. MOORE remarked, that he had no wish to suppress the information upon which his Bill was fdunded, and he had no objection to allow the Bill to stand over till the next Session ; but he hoped he should be permitted to consult the country Gentlemen now in town, and ascertain their opinions upon the propriety of taking the second reading to-morrow. Mr:PHILLIPS thought it would be well to gt rid of the present bill, but they should take care thin they did not add to instead of diminish the diet-; culties of that Bill by the present measure. The Petition was read, ordered to lie on the table, and to be printed. ADMIRALTY 01PIPICiS 124 - 11 1 11INO GARD'S& Mr. BROUGHAM wished to ask a question re specting the houses in Spring gardens: He wished to knew whether the Treasury had received an esti mate of the five thousand pounds to be laid out in rebuilding certain houses situated there, and alio whether them was any estimate of the value of the buildings proposed to be removed ? The SEQRETiIitY of the TREASURY replied, that the estimate was not then in,his possession, but he could very soon obtain.it. Mr. BROUGH AM.—Then perhaps, Sir, the Hon. Gentleman will have the goodness to give me that in formation to-morrow; and he may at the same time, ,perhaps, be enabled to inform me whether there are ' any offices unoccupied in the Admiralty adapted to residecce ? -• " . Cononens. Sir It. SHAW presented a Petiticd from certain Coroners in Ireland, complaining of the present ad ministration of the law by the Sheriffs of Ireland, and praying for the repeal of the Bill recently passed under the auspices of the Hon: Member for Galway (Mr. Martin). ' Mr. S. RICE supper:eating plrestrof the Petition. The Public, he•said,had elPerillehddlesueh loss from the present MIL:. . . _.. ::..:_ Mr. R. MARTIN esid c it,was nevi -estraordinarY to hear that evijs had resultc.3 from a measurealmilar to that which in England was found so adrieteseons- Sir „I. NEW PO la cootended that tbelaet had been groisly abused by'the Under - Sheriffs; and the suitor had formerly his second remedy, and that no incon siderable relief, of applying to the Coroner, .It was proverbial in Ireland that the *King's writ did not run to the county of.Galway—(A lanes} Mr. MARTIN explained, that as the .epunty of . Galway hid been particularlyalluded to be vanstbe rrinititil t o say s that . since the p wire of Isis Dill ti e ! county he represented had every -reason to iejoice in it Measure which destroyed the truth of the proverb. -,..7*Mr. •GOULBURN did not see why. the. system .which worked so well in England should net be found esinagy snieeetrilli Ireland. • Mr: DALY 'duppiwted the alteration seal& tad beers mide.--;The Petition was thent eitliatid imblifil to lie on the. table. .. • - - i ..' . ' . • • . • SIR THOMAS MAITLAND. ._ ~F . , qf , Mr. NUME was desirous bf•necertaining fresh thit 4elenial Secretary whethitO - • wa s the antenttOn of -Qtroannient to recall ft*. ' r stsperiuttatidence of tie iliedan Islands Sir Tinsman Maitland: the Governer P Mr. WILf4IOT-HORTOI4 -replied, that no such intention existed ; and he only hoped: that the Il& neurahle Gentleman would fureish hint With the spe cific charges upon which he meant to' est his mg doo before he brought it forward. 1,. - . R&LO DR sr.. • • Mr. LEONARD rose to more. for leave to bring sin a Bill to amend the laws relating to the interment and s:oo4ns of ,ersons committing/We d, se. By the. custom of this'country, the bodatiflierwissfriedeg were subjected, * ' by lair;-biteby a barbarous peas.. tice, to certain indignities; and by law, indeed, they. were deprived of •tite risbts• of. christian burial. . By. the Casmi.Law there were three partiesuriginelly tin pliveti-orChristinn boxial: first, those Who committed „Ale de se; secOsidly,tfibse whihadbeenationstnu uitatedi and , the third class cousisted• of ..thnsti whO net -been baptised, . Now he had no intention ef @loving for the repeal of that part of the law which Ankle the crime Off* de se so censurable as • that its . • omission should tieprive the individual of Chris dun burial; but he was merely desirous of repealing. that barbaroui customs • which subjected the body. 6 further degradation.--Leave was giren to bring in R. Bill accordingly. . . .. tIMPS'iIIatIAXCE OP THE °TRICE OF LORD LIRI/711. • NANT IN IRRLAND. , v i :*lift HIFME route bring forward his Motion u • • OM , subj ect; kart, Mt the suggestion of Mr: &emery Piet, oesseented•topostpone it for the present. , ADKINISTRATIOW OF JOBVICII IR srw amnia 111411411. Mi. WILMOTAORtON said, , that he - • shouldi merely move for leave to bring in a BUN. the: ter Administration ' cif Jostle* in Nisi South W The Bill, When printed, would be cineulated;aad • • 'clebatc could be taken on the seCondreading.-=.Leave ~,. ..cordingly, given. • : enucto,- LAWS. discretipn, and tote 1 :e his tang •et . t, — rowel) , 'wowed ;ke itinwetob it opinion. a : Attornty-Goostalibinh it Wag& b. M,a y 4 act 7•••Conalitly not. Misr differ with the Law Mete at thitinicnvit I heard. I trot heard hint tay so at et . • Me. .P] thry . • - -----'~:"Z' • West Riding of Yorkshire, con es :fins yr general igrieskural •• • : 'on: too minute Ur)* •. e k e 1 ._:. 111 mesent Bill. • • 411 dlseretil read. ssid red Mir on the tall& ' , Di • • • w veneers we Lanz; he ••I Sr 11.,wva a .Slititiot from thlispaß.o ••, • Sesotho Ann ose• sofas praolibth. wade. ant ; " ' *tests so to act of their Lordv — nir; RR *memo& a from on !madams; ble M • li r • • •' • ita Stgior eti to the solemni- *last war% C ot Requesto.PlL Wit which he ha • , , . ?--Not that Alta NT_ p a Peel** From d idea netted witkahe ' lO % , iV - fcittlittthe commit* Hem ikus Vike rgOtless , oldie solstondvet or • • 'By cappd a Guild of ig ef ek i nt s p u bi s , pa d ray * for t ivi i rT! Kink for Coventry would not press his ion by the. / Aw that he .shottitl_ rer-Aitoirt ' the prevent Session. He was sure that the re- acot nwancet tt le nullity clause eitor-Genendhad any intention of btipgine forward die soli of prating the Bin would create some appre- !tttalwuffds ...-- _ _ new •;, _ ,1011041 NA I. Ii.AWS. ' to divido AC lditsl . moon • the Imager vatasee , - wA Mr. PEEL, ama to *rodeo, certain Bills, to which ,the.fa s mV i gt .aa Avant, that riE lasOr tt ir " 4 " -- tai a former nighthe hod alluded, connected with the TrOM ... ~ . ~, la the 'I/tidier - d; VI& set list" •. . i maid meal *Ennui Criminal Laws. The other .capital cpiodlo ;b: . Vithresiaeirdn'it. •s• ; . cois. isifamie l that of slestroiing hop- 'les, shoal& bitrea-, . Ir. U Wi ts i l l at lVAr sitinst the BM. - ,i - -ilecedhableio transport* .vo siz io Viiven, .. 8'.... . 'lf - . IP II -: di o w . to bring in Bills,: in order to retry ..,,. , .--- . A i. eir4) iitiiihrthe44: at die sgt o o iat changes into law, • •• - - -1.-; , : f h-. ‘ be i lii i ;can't . In freliad; and denied that ware • . a lttlFr i'T DialalL al 'i_ _, ~ . ' ihe effesta(disfranchislag the Roman Catill. n . Ier.CALCR' .moved the Order ordlivief ' ' C. C. HUTCHINSON •an be 'was as MVO I p i . -me*, the into the seniert of the . ~ Rkyjett 5n eselpi illetitieits votes. Bet be f win : cf ahlwr•-.4lir ILHancat i s dse:Ohair, • , ~ , 1 , : 4 .14r!ca.auttilli •:iriii; ' • `.tt"linic abs ' b he Mr. cAugArr called the Atteroey4eeoiral fee Iresid. iiii i rmci ! lie. fie' .t - it k 4 **rude& 0 she law 011ooto to Oral Motiotoriato ON ibro t t iti 'tat; sd ed itiet . SRL "lb . viz. weewaw)--irot that 4 -mew. • -• • , • , 1 , `,.... u .!,,, e ..1. .... 44 1 ,...., k . .. as it • Did th ey so order Major Sirr in the ewe 4 rintakt-740 ; isq.-- ------ • further - con. they advised, but did net order. The Dligistrate *odd nor- t ' He warned his Lion. Friend who is . ... • • . . . .