Star. — London, England, 1810-08-24 00:00:00

CELEBRiffION or in M -D IKE or CL4IRENCE'S BIRTHAT. , Tuesday his Royal Highness the Duke of CLA• AENCE completed his 46th year, which was not, as usua l, celebrated by his Royal Highness at the seat at Bushy Park, on account of his Royal Mother, the Q uEE s, desiring to commemorate the day at her own h o use at Frogmore, by having all her sons and daugh ters under her own roof at one time, and for the day to b e kept as a family rejoicing ; which was accord . inglv done all of her sons and daughters visiting her m A j E cry upon the occasion, except the Princess low a, A , who. although in an improving state, was not suficciently recovered to join the illustrious family. accou nt of the unceasing attention which her m Aj ory pays to the KING, she determined not to celebrate the day on Tuesday, but deferred the obser vance till Wednesday, on account of his MAJESTY being absent that day, as usual, from Windsor, to hold his Court n London. About half past three o ' c lock, her MAJESTY, Princesses AUGUSTA, ELIZA.. ;T yr, MAR , / and SOPHIA, the Prince of WALES, the Dukes Of CLARENCE, KENT, CUMBERLAND, SUSSEX, and CAMBRIDGE, went from the Castle in- their car riages to Frogmore Lodge , where they amused them selves' in walking in those delightful gardens, and ad miring her MAJESTY'S taste and elegance ; while the band of the Staffordshire Militia played most excel lently on the lawn.—Soon after four o'clock dinner was announced, at which time the Duke of YORK ar rived in his travelling carriage from London, after attending his MAJESTY previous to his holding the Levee. —A few select friends were invited to join the rejoicings of the day ; among them were, The Marchioness Cornwallis, Earls Uxbridge and Harcourt, Countesses Uxbridge, Harcourt, Harrington, and &better, Lords Montague, Longford, and Walsingham, Ladies Sydney, Ely, G. Ni le ,* and Collyer, Count Munster, General Wy,yard, Co lonels Desbrow and Taylor. The band played on the lawn appropriate tunes and pieces, at the conclusion of the toasts. The health of the Duke of CLARENCE was drank with a particular mark of respect, and the band played Rule Britannia. At half past 6 o'clock, the Royal party partook of tea and coffee; and at seven o'clock, being informed the liho had returned from London much sooner than vas expected, or had done for a considerable time past, her MAJESTY retired for the purpose of attend ing the KING. The *hole of the company, of course, then separated. The Prince of WALES left Windsor for London. WATERING PLACES. ARRIVED. AT SCARBOROUGH. Mr. and fivr Miss Chaplins, Mrs. and two Miss Knowles, Mrs. Linton, Mrs. Mulgrave, Mr. Smith, Mr.Teasiale, Mr. and Mrs. Stanley, Mrs. ?molt, Miss Stott, Mrs. Carr, Mrs Hunt, Mr. Mrs and Miss Topless, Miss Fawcett, Mrs. Robinson, Mr. Ind Mrs. Boron Shaw, DeSimpson, Mr. Cooke, Mr. S. Cooke, Mr. and Mrs. Gerardot and family, Miss Thnrougkton, Mr. parkin, Miss Fleck, Mr and Miss F.vison, Mr. Markiand, Mrs. and Miss Co:, Car Ward, Mr. Creather, Mr. Bowes, Mr. Mrs and two !Vbs. Bullocks, two Miss Jacksons, Mr. Mrs. and Miss Whitfield, Capt. Sykes, Messrs. Leighton, Day, Bovton, R. Wilson, Travis; Miss Middleton (Hull), Mr. Mrs. and Misses Pear. Mr. and three Misses Walker, Mr. and Miss Wormald, Mr. Wall, r, two Mr. Kirchalls, Mr. and Mrs. Bowman, Mrs, Blickall, Mr. and Master Thompson, Mr. Gehlard, Mr. Harri son, Miss Lloyd, Mr. Russell, Mr. and Mrs. Dickson, Mr. and Mrs. Jackson, Mr.and Miss T. Teasdale, Mr. Mrs. and BiligS Collik4S, Mr. Hart, Miss Stapleton, two Mr. Wilsons, Mr. and Mrs. Bolton and family, Mr. and Mrs. Houseman, Mr.and Mrs. Bowen,Mr. and Miss Aconby, Mr. and Mrs. Fisher, Rev. Dr. Mrs and Miss Waver, Miss Balker, Mrs. Macleod, Mr. Ken. nedy, Mr. Gee, Mrs. and two Miss Acombs Mr. and Mrs. Pam- and family, Mr. Mrs. and two Miss Vavavasours, Mr. and Mrs. Wharton, Mr. Kaye, Mr. Beardsley, &c. &c. AT BATH. Countess Spencer, Admiral Wolseley, CoL Parker, Col. Brooke, Major Smith, Dr. Haygarth, Capt. Ward, Capt. Smith Mr. and Mrs. Snne, Mrs. and Mi►s Barnard, Rev. Dr. Toulmin, Messrs. Nunn, H. Brooke, Willoughby, Robertson, Dyol, Poyntz, Cobb, Gore, Payne, Tily, Cooper, Festal!, Cornish, Noad, Webb, Cox, Dowall, Crane, Toulmin, Frere ; Mistresses Tourney, Lambert, Lomax, Parish, Ellis, Palm, Hough, Macguire, Beckham, and Hooper; Misses Fleming, Kent, Lapp, &c. AT REDCAR. Messrs. Donaldson, Preston, Denison, Brigham, Connor. Har ter, Carter, Braithwate, Johnson, Gill, Celdbeck, Jones, Brant ley, Brignall, and Clarkson ; Mr. and Mrs. Reid, Mr. and Mrs. Peacock, two Mr. Harrisons, Mr. and Mrs. Duck and family, two Mr. Lintons, Mr. and R. Walker and family, Mr. and Mrs. Oastler, two Mr. Fawdington, Miss Glencairn Mrs. Cooper, Mrs. and Mi ss S am p son , M rs . W alker , Mr. and Mrs. R. Jackson and family, Mr. and Mrs. Thompson, Mr. and Mrs. Hamilton. Mr. G. and Miss Law, Mr. and Mrs. Langdale, Mr. and Mrs J. Blades, Mrs. 'Gill and family, Ma. and Miss Meek, Miss Peasock, Mr. J. Hickson, Miss Other , Miss Masterman, Mr. Mr. J. and Miss Dixo n , Miss Smith, Mr. Robson and family, Miss Cass, Mr. W ar d an d family, Mr. and Mrs. Wetherill and family, Mr. Stagg, Mr. Leaf, Mr. and Mrs. Tate and family, Mr. Burdett, (Sir Francis's son), Mr. and Mrs. Lumley, Miss Braithwaite, Mr. Hodgson and family, Miss Hodgson, Mr. and Mrs. Press aid family (York), Mr. Nelson, Mr. and Mrs. Alderson, Mr., Paul and f am il y, M r. G . C lafton, M r. Wi lk i n, M r. Shepherd and 'on, Mr. and Mrs. Hipton, Mrs. I. Watson, Mr. Tyerman, Mr. H. Hirst and son, Mr. D'Oyley and son, Mr. R. Addison, &a. AT CIIILTENHAM. Lord and Lady Manners, Ladies Williams, Monson,and Chai r:no; Cnunt Zenobio, Hun. Mr. Eld, Sir Grenville Temple, Admiral Holloway and family, Colonels Bradshaw, D. Coning knit Woodrii , gton, and Mason ; Lieutenant-Colonels MtLaine, Drummond, Wickland, and Greene; Captains G. M. Gibson, Burke, Barnard, Millar, J. Price, Rolfes, Turner, Scott, and Trigney; Dr. Booth, Rev. Dr. and Mrs. Young; Reverends Ceorge Davis, George Gosllind, Thomas Jackson, Charles Lapri mandaye, Mr. Colman, Mr. Grenville, George Savage, William Green, T. H. Coles, William Churchill, Mr. Ward, H. N. Hughes, Mr. Jones, T. H. Monk, and S. Micher ; Mr. Robin so,l and family, Mr. Mrs. and Miss Godwin, Mr. Mrs. and Miss I "'it, Mr. and Mrs. Bonar, Mr. and Mrs.Thwaite, Mr.andMrs. Caru'ner, Mr. and M rs . Watson, Mr. and Mrs. S mith; Messrs.) Cathcart, Bushby, Musgrove, Ryan, Lindsey, Butler, Raper, Bell, Shaw, Lewis, Heley, Miller, Allen, 131rnard, Cunningham, Gow lznd, Dumbleton, Thomas, jun. Box, E. Hamner, V.'aUer, An "leY, A. Grant, T. Mackey, E. Pemberton, St. George, Por ter, Irwin, Lawrence, Wedderburn, Drake, Pigott, W. John s3o, Jones, Coats, Flint, Wright, Wallis, Ellis, Nabb, Drum. "lid, Brandt, Strangman, Wall, Alcoek, Hudson, G. Gelb, SandY , , Colwin, P. Lu gg i n , A. Grant, Butler, Parkin, Sm ar t, Weeding, T Leech, J. Innes, 6annon, T. Shearman, Bayley Halliday, Correll, Watson, Fereday, Wadington, Akins, Cham bers, Thorne, Teissier, }loworth, and A. Smith ; Mrs. and Miss Jackson, Mrs. General Lloyd, Mrs. Capt. Rolfes, Mrs. Taylor, Mr . Shiner, Mrs. Douglas, Mrs. T. Pemberton, and MrsiMure. An unpleasant and rather alarming accident hap pened at our Theatre, on Tuesday evening. One of the Performers slipped in coming out of the dressing loom, and Will; precipitated down a whole flight of stairs, by which his ancle was sprained, and his leg otherwise much bruised, so that an apology became necessary ; and the audience very good-naturedly ad mitted of a change in the Farce. Although 46 Hit mid Min" could not be acted, (Jerry illations being' thus suddenly disabled), as all tl3e Performers were dressed for the piece, Mr. CHATTERLEY gave the Illastrup song ; and Mr. WEBB two or three of his best Irish, with which every auditor seemed highly gratified. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT' or CHANCERY, AT THE ROLLS. THE ATTORNEY -HERNIAL Ve. THE EARL OF.CLARENDON. Judgment delivered by MI Honour the MASTER of the Rotas, on Satiirday • August 18,1810. MASTER OF THE ROLLS (Sir W. GRANT). The information in this case has three objects : first, the removal of such of the Governors of Har row School, as are stated not to have been duly elect ed; secondly, the better administration of the revenues of the Charity ; and thirdly, an alteration in the pre sent constitution or establishment of the School. The first object is sought to be obtainrd, on the ground of the Governors not being inhabitants of the parish at the time of their election. By the letters patent of Queen Elizabeth, the Go vernors of Harrow School are constituted a body cor porate ; now this Court has no jurisdiction with respect to the election, or removal of members of Corpora tions of any description. In eleemosynary corporations these are matters of visitorial jurisdiction ; and where, for want of an heir, the Crown becomes the visitor, it is by petition to the Crown, and not by bill in this Court, that the removal of a Governor from the corporate character which de facto he has held, is to be obtained : this has been settled in the case of Grantham and Coventry Free Grammar Schools ; and in the case at the rela tion of the Attorney• General. . _ Where the election of Governor was tried to be set aside in the Court of Chancery, the Chancellor de clined removing him, till a petition was presented to him in his visitorial capacity. Corporations constituted trustees, have, by the de cree of this Court, sometimes been divested of that character, for abuse of their tfust, as any other trus tees would have been. Such was the case of the Cor poration of Coventry in the time of Lord Harcourt ; but that is a very different thing from divesting a corporate capacity. Whether any visitor disposed to inquire into origi nal eligibility, can be allowed to do so after such a length of time, is a point on which it is not necessary for me to give an opinion. That part of the infor mation, therefore, which has for its object the re moval of the Governors, must be dismissed. As to the revenues of the Charity, the information complains partly of the management of the estates, and partly of the management of the income. With respect to the management of the estates, it is said that there has been a deviation from the rules of the Founder, to the injury of the Charity ; that the Go vernors do not appoint from among themselves a sur veyor of the estates ; that the tenants are not made to covenant to do all repairs ; that the rents are not received at the School-house, but that a receiver is paid for collecting them ; and the information also complains of management generally improper, inde pendent of the Founder's rules. It is charged, that part of the School estate is let to Mr. Williams at an under value ; and it is said that other parts of the estates are let below their esti mated value. _ _ The Governors in answer to this saw, that the de viations have not been introduced in their time, and that the deviations are beneficial rather than injurious to the School estates. As to the few acres and a barn let to Mr. Williams, they say they reserved a full rent for the same, and as higher rent than was offered by any other person. 41 this branch of the case, I think the relators arientitled to have inquiries directed to ascertain whether the estates are properly and advantageously managed ; but this must be with a view to prospec tive regulations, if any such should be found to be necessary. As to the lease of Mr. Williams, though nothing wrong can in a moral point of view be imputable to him or the Governors, yet, according to the ge neral rule which this Court adopts, in order to guard against possible frauds, he could not become a lessee of lands, which it is the duty of the Go vernors to let to the best advantage. If he is in possession of the lands, he must deliver them up, and be charged with the full value of them, if it shall appear the rent he has paid falls short of the full values. With regard to the application of the income, it is alledged that some of the purposes are neglected, to which the income ought to be applied; and that part is applied to purposes not within the scope of the Charity. The appropriation of the surplus income after being applied to the Charity, is partly to 1”. ac cording to the founder's rules, and partly to be left to the discretion of the Governors. As it appears that the application of the income is not in all respects agreeable to the Founder's rules, I think it should in future be ascertained by a scheme, having due regard to the Founder's directions, and the alteration of cir cumstances since his time, which may be such as to render a literal adherence to his directions adverse to the spirit of them. • I do not understand that the relators state any thing with a view to ckarge the Governors personally and retrospectively for any abuse of the funds. I am persuaded that they have administered the reve nue of the Charity to the best of their judgment, and that they have been actuated by no improper motives in what they have done, or omitted to do. There is one article of expenditure to which, by mad by, I shall more particularly advert ; I mean that which regards the schoolmaster's house. It is in some degree incidental to what is the more imme diate object of the suit ; namely, the Constitution of the School. In the examination of the relators, the School no longer answers the purposes of the foundation, and in that view, the whole expenditure is misapplied. Considering, say they, the very small proportion which the parish boys bear to the other scholars, the income of the Founder is rather for the more commo dious education of the rich, than the gratuitous edu cation of the poor ; and it is contended that some measure ought to be adopted by ti,e Court for secur ing to the inhabitants of the parish the full benefit in tended for them by the institution. We must see in what sense it is true that the inhabitants of the parish have aot the full benefit of the institution, before we can judge whether a remedy is practicable. It is not alledged that there is not a commodious School, or that there are not competent teachers, or that any of the children of the parish are refused admittance, and were not carefully taught when ad mitted. At first sight it seems that the benefit of t)is • 146. union is within the teach of the inhabitants, so far at _they choose to avail themselves of it • but it is said, there are so many foreigne rs , th a t i s , that so many per sons not entitled as parishioners to be grAtnitously educated, resort to this school, that the parishioners Are deterred from sending their children there, partly because of the ill-treatment they receive, and partly from the apprehension of their acquiring expensive habits, by their associating with persons of a rank su perior to their own. If this statement is true, it is diMcult to conceive what remedy the Court can apply. The only com plete one would be the eiclusion of foreigneri ; but this would be incompatible with the intention of the founder. Would it not go the extent of saying, that this school should be a parochial school ? yet the founder has declared that the Master may receive over and above the youths on the foundation, so many foreigners as may be well taught, and the place may contain. It is not attempted to be shewn that this number has been exceeded ; but in the next place, would the parish gain by the conversion of this distinguished Seminary of Learning into a Parochial School ? It cannot he supposed that (or the present salary a man of talent would supply the place of a master; and to give a large salary would-be the least likely mode for securing his diligence and attention iw the sphere to which he would be confined. As to the limitation of the number of foreigners, it certainly would not be productive of any advantage. 1 do not know the numbers from which bad habits may be learned, or ill-treatraeat may be suffered ; but is it true that to the alledged causes the paucity of the present scholars on the foundation is to be attri buted ? Why should Harrow School be distinguished from other schools in which the admission of foreigners does not prevent the parishioners from taking the be nefit of the foundation ? Upon the whole of this part of the case, it appears to me, that taking the evidence together, the alledged conspiracy against the parish boys is not made out ; the number of instances of treatment proved is no greater than in the course of the years which have passed might have happened from accidental circumstances ; while the statement of the circumstances in which there was no such treat ment, seems to negative the uniform hostility alledged to prevail. Several witnesses, and among them pa. rishioners, say, that tliere are few parish scholars, be cause there are but few parishioners who wish to give their children a classical education. Giving credit to them, the number there at any time would be small ; I should therefore be loth to take any step that might impair the general utility of the school, or lower it to the foundation. In some schools the master has an allowance per annum for every scholar taught on the foundation.— To that mode I see no objection ; but any restriction as to the number, except that which the Founder has prescribed, would not be efficacious ; and I cannot consent to a reference to the master to frame a scheme with a view to any such object. It is said, that if the parishioners do not wish to send their children to the School, or are prevented from doing so by causes which this Court cannot contrcul, the foundation ought not to be applied to expentes attending the School, but the parish ought to have the benefit some other way. The parishioners, howiver, must be con tent to take the benefit in the way the Founder has thought fit to give it. The School is not to be let down because within a given period few or no parish scholars are sent to it. The Founder has determined that there shall be a Grammar School for ever at Harrow, and he has provided funds for the founda tion. In that Grammar School, parish children are to be taught gratuitously ; but the Founder also meant to encourage other scholars, and to impart every benefit to them, except that of gratuitous teach ing. The School must have been built of larger di mensions, and at a greater expellee, with a view to their accommodation. The play-ground must have been adapted for the whole number of scholars, and not for the parishioners only ; the exhibitions are not to fail, because the parishioners are not qualified to go to the University ; others are to have the benefit of them. cannot admit that the propriety of the expenditure I is to be measured by the number of parish boys to be benefited, provided it is an expenditure referable to the purposes of the School. This brings me to notice the expenditure in the repairs of the master's house. It is clear the master is to be provided with an habi tation at the expnce of the trust. The Founder states his intention to build a neat and convenient room for the master or usher. How long it was kept up, or where it was built, does not appear. He directs that I the court-book shall be kept in a chest in the house kept for th:. tchool•mastet? It appears that as far back as 1670, an allowance was made to the master for the house. In 1671, there was some allowance to fit up his house for the accommodation of himself and boarders. In 1672, a house belonging to the trust is given free from rent, and there are entries in the books of the items of the sums expended in the repairs of the master's house. When the present master was appointed, the house being nut of repair, the Governors agreed to give £l2OO towards the repairs ; that sum was not suffi cient for those which were necessary, and the master has laid out £5OOO in enlarging and improving the house. It thus appears that the Governors, instead of in creasing the schoolmaster's salary out of the aug mented revenues of the Charity, have given him in another shape a benefit, the amount of which I think is not extravagant. In the case of Rugby School, which was before the Lord Chancellor two years ago, the expenditure of Lid master was much larger ; and the objections made on the same grounds, as those relied on in the present case, were not allowed to pre vail. Rugby School was founded in the time of Elizabeth, and was to be a free grammar school for children at Rugby and Blinklow, and afterwards, in process of time, it became, as it was very likely it should, similar to Harrow, a great public school, and the scholars out-numbered the foundation in the pro portion of ten to one. In the I.7th of his present Majesty, an Act passed relative to the estates which directed the Trustees to lay before the Court of Chancery plans for the appropriation of the sur plus rents. Under the order of reference, a scheme was laid before the Master of the Court. It w.n proposed to add R 2 for every boy, to make it as for every boy on the foundation; to add to the number of ethibitioim 1 to give several thousand pounds rot . re-hailding the House for the accom.notfation or' boarders, and £5OO for other buildings. The M.ts et teported that he approved of the said plan, except as to such parts as related to th# re-buil•!ing of the Schoolmaster's house, and erecting new offices and studies on the increase of the number of the ex hibitioners. He stated that he did not approve. I such part of the plan, for although he was of opinion it was necessary that a sufficient dwelling-house, with offices, should be erected for the accom:nodation of the master and boys, and that it was proper the num ber of exhibitioners should he increased, provided they were elected from the scholars of the Charity ; yet, having regard to the size of the dwelling house, to the number and the description of the ushers, among whom were French and drawing -masters, and also the number of b )ys educated at the said school be tween 1800 and 1806 inclusive, not more than one fourth belonged to the said Charity, and that of the number of exhibitioners chosen during the same time, one-third only were taken tmm buys belonging to the Charity; it did appear to him, that such dwel ling-house and offices were calculated for the recep tion of boys of different descriptions, and educating them in a different manner from what was intended by the Founder, or by the Act of Parliament before mentioned of the 17th of the King, and to the preju. dice of the boys who were entitled to the Charity ; nor did he approve of the plan, as there was no con sideration of the alms-men or alms-houses • and the petitioners neglected to lay any other plan before WM, though required so to do. The Trustees presented a petition to the Chancel- . lor, praying, that notwithstanding the report, they might be atliberty to carry their plan into execution ; and the Chancellor ordered that the petitioners be at liberty to carry into effect the plan for the disposition of the funds so carried in before the Master ; and for that purpose it was ordered, that the petitioners be at liberty to pay the master £2 per annum for each boy, raise £l4OO for the purposes of the plan, enlarge the nttmber of the exhibitioners, and act pursuant to the scheme of the trustees. It is therefore obvious', that the Chancellor did not conceive an expenditure to be improper, which tended to the general advantage of the school, merely because it was not calculated for the direct and immediate advantage of the boys OR the foundation. The only part of the information remaining to be noticed, is that,phich represents the course of educa. tion and internal discipline, as not entirely agreeable to the rules laid dalq l by the founder. But the Go vernors are cxptossfy aiskorised to alter those rules, and such alterations as nye been long known, and acquiesced in, will be presumed to have been made by the authority of the Founder, though the precise or der, whether this or that book is to be read in a par ticular form, or the boys go to school at a particUlar time, is to be left to the Governors to determine. If there is any material alteration from the foundation, the visitor may be called upon to repair it. Such being the opinion I entertain, it will only re main to frame a decree in conformity to it. The de tails of this May be the subject of subsequent ecnsi , deration. There Is agteat irregularity at present in the inter course with Holland. A Gentleman who has taken the precaution of having his letters numbered, has the interval unsupplied between numbers73and 84., which he attributes to the interference of the French Police. Yesterday, at Guildhall, W. Carter (whom we men tioned in a former paper as having been remanded, charged with stealing a silver spoon from Peele's Coffee-house,) was brought up again, when the wait ers of Morland's, Old Slaughter's, and the Turk's- Head Coffee-houses, also preferred similar chargis against hem ; in consequence of which the worthy Alierman, much to his regret, was obliged to com mit him for trial. W. leiliiaau was charged by T. Smith, of Ken. nington-lane, with attempting to snatch his watch out of his fob. The prosecutor stated, that as he was going up Ludgite ill, On Wednesday evening, the prisoner made a „ hat his watch chain, which broke, and he ran off, up the Old Bailey. Witnesi pursued and seized him. He was fully committed: and had only been discharged for a similar attempt on Monday, which he said he bad done in jest. A carrier applied for an order to cause a merchant to accept a parcel, or make him pay the carriage to which the gentleman replied he knew what was in he had not opened it ; and as it was a matter which would be subjected to legal inquiry between him and a correspondent of his in the country, he felt it iml possible either to accept the parcel or pay for its de. livery. Alderman Ansley said, as that was the case he would make no order on it, but advised the canier to inform his employer (Mr. Willan,) that be might take what steps he might think proper. A guard of one of Mr. Procktor's coaches, was brought up by that gentleman, and charges by hi d with receiving 2s. from a passenger ; which fare he did not account for to his master. Mr. Procktor es. pressed his unwillingness to prosecute him ; but he had been so robbed in the same way lately, that he could not look over it. The man stated, that he had a sick wife on the road ; and that going to see her he had forgot to enter it in his way-bill. After some consultation with Mr. P. the Magistrate told the pri soner, that by Sir J. Sinclait's Act, he was subjected to a penalty of £lO, not mitigable to less than £5 ; but in consideration of his wife and family, Mr% P. had kindly consented to let him be discharged oU merely paying his fees. - At Union-Hall, Edward Davie:, a young man about 20, was brought up for re-examination, charged with an assault on the niece of his master, to whom he was an apprentice, with an intent to violate her person. The child appeared to be about eleven years of age, arid stated that the prisoner had made several attempts to effect his purpose. For want of sureties. the prisoner was committed to take his trial for the assault at the next Sessions. • Yesterday Mary Walton, alias Butt, end C. Wit ten, were charged at Worship-street Office, with coin ing base money. It appeared that several officers en tered the premises inhabited by the prisoners, whom they secured, together with a large quantity of finish. ed and unfinished pieces resembling shillings, anl as many implements for coining, as filled a cart. The prisoners were remanded, in order to give ' tor of ap Mint an opportunity of aueuding. 4 i - e;3 Aida