Star. — London, England, 1817-06-28 00:00:00

voicti to tLe Itege,nt, praying for of the Yeti; ions Lad Memorials addressed to ) v. Highness in the List :in.! presert years, on ct ct ;ht.: 1.;:qiort::: ion r,lCotton..Yarn. PL'[UrV-.Ns. ,• ei - NNET e - ...._n::.1 a Pet i eten from Tho . s . le in riedirenient Leder the II the:is „ss Act. The petitioner Sc. ham ani his son had ben arrentes! or. the 9.11 Llay ee:y, and shttt tip it. a pi, n. . Sic ieti hin e .1 • 7 Ls stenitiontel bef re ti:_ e'te:nrel, T • !.: '.•:,! 1, it he kitiee Lt l'r. it, t ,izeieer I td • • e to that E. , etz in he foi easlie !• 7 7 ro h. ~.. hat; see,: 0 to • •e .e ot 11 , 7 .11u , :le r:;•• ..•1 :or...Li:Jed a.; petitientr 0, the -•.. . 1 7-. 1 eitiieeee. Itad al-pliee for alt audicece t' Li Secretary of State, tor the purpose of re , , te be librrated on bait, that the w' r!•• of his it ;glit not be fete, hut on :I.l[es-cit.:ate he hid e .en remeved It) a condemned ce:l, kt ,, tt seat inety rifiser•ibly fernished, Horseetonger-lane gaol. heir been stihjected to many ; lie 1 put in irons. 1:e cesnplainec: n! this ti bet three :ilagistrate.: who visited :tint justilLsd Lon this he had mate a reette.entaiion on the • :7:sict to the S:a:tare of State ter the Home De eetroent. wit had ii. consequence ordered them to tak. From t! . .v lath of April he had been to les apaitm.mt, cut off from the cheering 74%1 t,f t..e suit, and deprived of all opportunities of :;;in air and Now, granting to the Go. ennient that it was necessary to confine this mein, • t.• eight the treatment he had received could not rectified; he therefore trusted the Right Honour . G•ll;l, • rnan iirte.e.ite would it:quite into the cir - eistae,es of th.. ease. The pi Ayer of the petitioner .1%. Peli for the Suspension of the Habeas ,iis Act might no: pass into a law, or that if it -el the House %%maid graciously and mercifully make eene exception in his favour, as from continued im- Fisonment his life would bent dander. YLr. FIIIsEV ADDING TON had never heard till wee et the harsh treatment complaire.d of by this pititioner, but in the instance et his having been pat ei irons, which had been immediately ordered to be !dela off. He could nut )et credit all the details of e.is petition ; be cotill not believe that the petitioner been treated with so much mole severity than ti i,I been experienced by any other person confined 1,....1er the Habeas Corpus Suspension Act. In no iitance had such rigour been sanctioned by the Sc. ary nt Suite, in the cases of individuals confined charges of high treason. lie could give the House (..e proof of this, by stating to them, that Dr. %Vat :.,sn on the day atter his acquittal, had written to the 5: cretary ot State a very becoming letter. thanking Lee fur die attention wh:ch had been p..id to all his t..e' , es 'tont the first day of his ci.afinLment down to e•el);:rivti of his liberation. He would inquire into r.o truth ee the ellegatinns contained in the petition, h.+, he thought it almost impossible that they could tura out to fa. co:leer. • • Mr. W I f. 1.1 ik M S ITH believed such severities had not been sanctioned by the Secretary of State, but at the same time he was ul opinion they might cccurred. While Loid Hardwicke was Lord Lieutenact of Ireland many ci Mites had been prac tised in the sister kingdom, , or which that Noble Lord no more been a p irty to than he (Mr. W. smith) had. In the same way the petitioner might 'nave been treated with undue rigour, though it was not known or countenanced by the • Noble Lord at the head of the Home thpartment. Mr. BARHAM said, there were two answers nsnally given in such cases. The one was, that the Secretary of State was a very good sort of a man, which he could not deny, and that theiefore the thing c , uld not be ; the other answer was, that the Right Honourable Gentleman knew nothing at all of the matter ; and this, lie was sure, be was as little dis used to deny, as the assertion included in the former answer. He wished to know if the man had been put in irons. If this allegation in the petition could not be refuted—ii such an abuse had occurred while that Douse was sitting, he wanted nothing more to prove what was the true character of that measure which they were called upon to pass. Mr. HILEY ADDINGTON begged to ask how was to know what took place in the interior of a (');1 The SPEAKER stated the course which the Ho- enable Member was pursuing to be out of order. Mr. PETER MOORE. said, every day proved the Secretary of State had been imposed upon .cut misled by those acting under him. In Ireland, , Techie!, had been committed without the, knowledge Lid I lardwicke, but during his administration,' ta.der a person if the name of Trevor, who, from evi.fence afterwards given before a Committee, ~ !fglit to have been hanged—aye, hanged a hundred tine's over—instead of being placed, as he now was, the Pension List. Similar abuses were likely to c4ne tinder the Habeas Curi - .os Suspension Act. Mr. MACDONALD remarked, that the Right Ifonourable Gentleman had asked him how he could f. exie , cted to know what pasted in a prison ? It he (.soli not Len what passed there, who could ? Now ci,P, contrary to law, as he must contend. the Ma ':isir..tes were excluded from visiting those in confine it seemed that, deprived of their protection, I were nut to succeed to that of the Secretary of such as it was. Mr. GURNEY inquired how it had happened, ''qat the petitioner lied not been allowed, like other ; It.rsons in confinement, t leave his apartment for the mkt of fresh air ? Mr. I ILLY ADDINGTON knew of no reason. 'lleaici why he should Out be allowed the same in• l i'q . %•:!ce-s as ~ ; hers. 11r. PENNETT remarl:ed, this man was in a jail, t is it.;ulations of which differed front those of the Pieolis to which other persons taken up under the 64 : , e Act had bean committed. He was sure great advantages would result hum bringing this business under the eye of the Secretary of State. Lord FOLKSTONE wished to know, who was rrspon..,ible for the treatment experienced by persons t!.' l s confined? They had been told on a former' I.y ht that persons charged with High Treason were 4 1.3:. to tolitary confinement, and were not to be eca!L with in tic same way as persons accused of "LI crimes. This, however, he contended, from tine reseatclies he had made, did not appear to be the law of the land. The Secretary of State, in the in structions which he had sent to the KI-eper of Read ing Gaol, had directed all persons to he excluded awn the priw, ers, who we.e not aut iotv,ed by him to s e lie had also directed not to put ihern in iions, unless this should be necessary, and had dm: assumed ttit , power of pliant ; them in irons Mr. Lti.ITHURST thought it was too much to exiiett when Petition like th it now before them teas presented for the tint time, that those con :IL ct..d v. - it!' the department to whiei the case be. i. snotan be able at once to speak in all the alle -I,4ti-ns it contained. These con!.l not be held to he proved to be true, till some Intl try had taken <utether subject. Lord COCHRANE thought the subject called for inga:ry. The parties t..ktni up had not been confinel it the sttoni; gai•l nt Newgate, merely because, it phtced there, the City Magistrates could have access to them. 11, I:use:o)rd die conduct of Ministers to. be most despotic. What did it aignity Wiethet t!it people were under one tyrant, or (lder the (hi ninion Ff the Drys on the opposite skit. of House ? They had no right to plead ign , rance of the situation of those they confined. This WV.. no ex cuse tot them; and, tar such conduct. they ought to be impe..ched at the Bar of that House. Th, Petition Oleo read, and ordcrea to 1k on the table. BA RHAI I / 4 1 gave notice, that, unless a satis factory explaihaina should be previously given, he would, on Tuesday, move that the Petition sh-tild be referred to a Committee. Mr. BROUGHAM said, one of the allegations of the Petition set forth, that a Petition to that Hoiise had been detained at the Office of the Secretary of State. If this cliaige were not onfound.d, a great bleach of the privileges of the House had been com mitted. It wouid be reniemb.atd the House had so determined the withholding of a Petition which had been intended to be presented early in the present Session, and ler hoped it would not be s.reil that they seese strong to maintain their privileges against the public, but not to delend them against a Secretary of State. Mr. PONSONBY coincided in all that had fallen from his Honourable and Lcarned Friend. • In the first instance it was proper that they should wait for an explanation fr:im the Office of the Secretary of. State, and it this should not be perfectly satislactorY. the subject ought to be inquired into by a Cornkttee, Lord CASTLEREAGH said it was' clear' there was ne indisposition on the part of . the S:.cretary el, State, to redress any grievance of which the indivi-' dual mrght justly complain. This his conduct wards the Petitioner had already proved. Ile 'wished the first application for relief to be made to the,Exe cutlet Government by the prisoners themsely . es, and not by Gentlemen who acted- by inspiration. This was reversing the course that hachlways been adopted. Lord FOLKSTONE did not know how his Ho. nourable Friend had received the Petrtion but he knew that the prisoners it ; Reading were not allo*ed to receive or to send ani loiter bur through the Se cretary of State.. How then came this' Petition to pass through his hand, without his pairing apention to its nature Mr. HURST was glad to understand. from what had been said this• evening. that no order had been made to prevent Magistrates from visiting the prisoners. • - Sir S. RQMILLY contended, that the Suspension . Bill did not give any discretionary power respecting the manner in which prisoners were to be treated. . After a few words from Sir WILL/Ahl Bynum:Gus and the Arrontsze.GENEßAL, the Petition was or deredto be printed. Lord OSSULSTON presented a Petition from the Mayor, Corporation, and Burgesses, of the B )rough of Berwick-upon Tweed, against the Suspension of the Habeas Corpus Act.—Read, laid on the table, and ordered to be printed. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT presented a Petition Irons the inhabitants of the town 'of Godalming, in the county of Surrey, against the Suspension of the Habeas Corpus.—Read, l a id on the table, and or- dered to be printed. SUSPENSION OF THE HABEAS CORPUS ACT. Lord CASTLEREAGH moved, that the Ha beas Corpus Suspension Bill be read a third time. Mr. BENNET'L' contended, that the best means of repressing disturbances, would be to provide work for the industrious, and food fer the hungry. In stead of that, his Majesty's Ministers had preferred adopting measures of severity, extending to the in nocent as well as the guilty. . He blamed such a line of policy. If severe measures were necessary, let them be local ones, but let not the whole Constitution be taken away from England and Scotland. He then referred to the period of 1312, at which greater dangers and more insurrectionary movements had threatened the tranquillity of the State, and at which, however, no suspension of the best liberties of the nation had been proposed. He contended that the Manchester plot was the semis: ot spies and infor mers, though not Asf the same class 2S Oliver and Company. In 181 1 2, it, was proved before the Com mittee, that the Militiamen employed to tepriss the disturbances, had themselves proposed to burn the Poor Houses. The intended conflagration at Man chester might proceed froin quarters equally uncon-' nected with the conspirators. lie then read a corn.' munication from a Gentleman of high respectability at Manchester, who stated that Oliver had been sent on three missions to that town, in April, May, and June ; that he had represented himself as intimate with Sir Francis Burdett, Major Cartwright; and others, but had never seen more than five persons to ' whom he had proposed a plot, stating the great num ber of people ready to engage in it, and advising them to send a delegate to Yorkshire—that on their refusal lie had actually sent two messengers to Yorkshire to fix a day for a rising, and that was the 9th of June— that he pretended to be employed by the people of Liverpool, Derby, Nottingham, and Birmingham.— 'hose five persons, whom Oliver had attempted to seduce into crime, implored to be heard at the Bar of the House on the facts which he had mentioned.— Oliver had seen none but them ; he always had plenty of.money, of which lie was not sparing; and the quarter front whence it came was not doubtful He then referred to the evidence o( Mr. Dickenson, taken before the: Magistrates at Wakefield, on Mon day, June 16, by which it appeared that Oliver had used the :Jame arts to seduce him and several others . into acts of rebellion. The Noble Lord op -nsite had said, that Oliver had asked for no reward. He hoped that he should haee one—the reward which he de served ; that he should, be given over t those laws veh•cf: he had hre':en, Cu!a noder which he nughe to suffer. S2veral wretches hid been lying under sen• tenee of death for .earn months 14 haviag seduced ignorant men to cornatit fel. , nies. Oliver had dine Worse ;he had t!‘e starving manufa.emers into tehellien. :.linis:ert brought for a•aid be:ter. . grounds than the I , pert of the Secret 1r immittee, and better evidence than the blasted Les:laicl of Oliver, Castle, anc: Co. he would never consent to place the power which they demanded into their hands ; for hr main:44 , 2d, that there (lid no: exist a people muse attached to their itistitutions, and more determined to keep their Censtitutioa than the fit itish people.. ( Hear, hear.) Mr. CHAR LES GRANT co.ati•aded that the case was Vile of rxtternc d.onger, and Tec!uired the applieatiou of this ::11)41y, which wt, cleat ty one or the poweis of the Co.ttituti,up, for the preservation of Liberty an,l property. lie I:new that there v Lee Away., g intet•tn,:.t..l :nen who disheiievcd in con spirit thr , u;z:i tt:ey re..lly existed, and it might •vouid he this ne,Jected when tl•ey Net: mil>t cap,hle of sup r re.ted. lie valueJ the Carpus Act, but 1, :: v . .dited thrsrt cred productions, urn ‘, Llch infamous and blas-1 phetnnus paroders had bc:.n published, poisoning the minds of the lower orders of the people, (Hear, hear), and if we must give up the reverewe for the one, or suspend the other, be should not hesitate about the Choice. (Hear.) It was well known that factious demagogues always erected tlitar engines upon the distresses of the people, with which they attempted to shake the State. (Hear, hear.) But he was sure , the interests of the poor, as we ll as u t every ot h er ' class would be secured by this measure. It was most consonant with the Constitution to adopt measures of prevention, rather than of punishment, and this was a measure of that kind. The argument, then, that the laws were sufficient to punish the disturbers,' he did not think :applicable to the present case. They were told that the disaffection was local.; it might be so, and this aleatory then was intended to prevent it from becoming general. "(llear, hear.) Against the arguments, that no man of rank, talent, and property were implicated in these transactions, and that the schemes were too ridiculous to be regarded seri ously, he would appeal to that monument of crime the-French Revolution:" (Hear, hear,) .The revo lutipuary spirit of the Continent had spre.4 in .this country, and unless it wait watched and chea.cd, the Constitution wo uld tall beneath its infhienee. • . Mr. WA !IRE said he should now give his oppo sition to a M 'awre which, thee months ago he sap ported. (Hear) He then depended on the unani. mous Report of the Committee, bele he since bad reason to believe be had suffered that Biwa to weigh too much with him. It would be recrllected that they were told - the danger was to be looked for .from the Spenceani, but where was that Society now ? The last Com inure, with all their powers of ' .investigation, had said nothing about those pant tioners of land ; of course they might now be per.' teed, at ease with respect to that tremendoui So. ciety. The Spafields affair and the Manchester rising were of much the same complexion. Mr. PROTHEROE gave his support to the for mer Bill from private information of an alarming de. scription, as seed as on the unanimous Report of the Committee. The time which had elapsed had given an opportunity to consider whether the remedy ape plied was the proper one, and he was wady to ac knowledge that he did n it think it was. His 1114-' jesty's Government had done right to prosecute the late trials, but the Jury declared that no ueason ex isted, and the example had convinced the people how small was the number of persons engaged in the dis tutbances, and bnw little there was to apprehend from any attempts to overturn the Government. On these grounds he should vote against the Bill. Mr. HART DAVIES agreed with his Honour able Colleague that the City of Bristol was free from the most remote suspicion of par.icipation in the rt.- cent treasonable des gus ; and that so far the measure was uncalled for. But he should ill discharge his duty as a Member of Parliament, if he confined Ins views upon the policy of a . general measure to the special relation it might bear'to the place which he represented—( Hear,- hear).—lt had been shewn by undeniable testimony, that attempts bad been mad: agairst the peace of the kingdom by artful and dis affected men ; whole districts had been in open atul declared insubardination, c and he th o u g ht t h at h e I should be Wanting in justice th the loyalty ef his Constituents,• if, under- these ' circumstances, he did I not lend his assistance to defeat their schemes, and punish their guilty abettors. • - . Mr. G. BANKS thought that tt,a report presented from the Committee distinguished, as it war, for la boriousness of investigation and accuracy. of jud 4. meat, would fully justify him in vciiing for. the Bill. Mr. BARHAM believed that the measmytheii before the House would not only be dAngeroUs t4iiie I Constitution, but to thy peace of the Country. ~ He desited to enter his solemn protest against the lienti ments that the Constitution would not he impaired by the Sespetision ti the Habeas Corpus Act.- To him the Habeas Corpus was the most essential idea- 1 lity of the Constitution, andrather than pa;t withir, I lie would submit to be governed by martial law,' :ie. had been already declared .by anutheedlonantalle Member. Whit security would there be for any man when this safeguard was gone? Any man might ! be dragged to a prison, his fortune sacrificed, and in, children ruined for want of his protecting care.— , What greater calamity could fall on a human being? ' I Could any thing exceed such an injury ? Yes, it 'might be aggravated by his being toldoefter all, that he I lived under a tree Constitutiou—(lieae,hear).—Cutt:d 1 there be a more humiliating, agoi34,ng meekeey ? i He would rather part even with the Trial by Jury 1 than with the Habeas Corpus Act. In the one case! he should have a right to some suit at trial, with Le' chance of a fair one; but de the other he coal leave no trial at all. It was said that this Bill would only operate against the evil designing, and that “ tne galled jade might wince." He, for his part, thought there was as little wincing on his side of the House, as in the quarter from which this smart and ;rev) , quotation had proceeded. His answer was.that des potic power was never attempted, omit by the most tyrannizal person... without a solemn and seothing assulanee 111'4 H it WAS Ilittlidtd Linty against the v - ickcd"-• (;*•-• • r 1 ,:(4) tr' I;.c' 01 C0111:1:":!.. la. ;I! 1 .1- 1,1 r 1. 4 .11•1:. Ot,l 'C tji itt' arar:a pcv. - .: was irn • hist:As v..ocht IV t. Lu; tL:,t they cotil..! such abuse. I! co:e Niir.!sters h 4.1 the pow:, without dlr.. ili.psitioo, cur liberty V•4s g4;:lt!. set:tin:rat •`1 , ..: to m s of f ; w• rvr.: , -w 1.• tr:! cwir , :... " Wll:ce'cr i:: 1 , 4-' Jd • t .. ..1 'Si- I:cal was a b tae tee. and unts rthy uf an Heeliietn; le It the Minietes deptiesd die Peop:e of. the C.•: .- ••• Ir. lien, they left them nothing worth dcfctidine. \''. 7 :(l: out the liabeas Cl:Tpus Act, therc was timhisi ka England to di, , it. .11 .it: lecr in hi, e) e, from tit.:ni...: despotic Seas ie I.;:iireei. 1.):. THII.I.reIOI;L cave his eeprort to tli:• /ii:!, considering it, in t:ft! :46 , 1:1i ste..• cif the c.vl:lll',', wise, just, and liesti inv. it ch.! net appear to hint that the conspir.e:y aii .iite the .veate was to he kie cried fret:: the Lea ce:idition ie! there who weir te - gaged in it. Toe. I.lwcr or‘lev , ., • wh,ot thee enf...red with acikrity, and eelisted their pa : ' .ions in s'lol 3 I' 561erne, IV6e Ole r1":4 I'll ert . ..ibit! ill'Aftl , :lenf'i that could be earecte.l avainst a (losis:ro,ee l t. It w ts a 1 remarho,l-- lect, that it was d ie iier those rei rms i e , w!.:ic!r the people en j a3 es! eu.tt fi . .r. . eo, that the..-11:: i;ed been sea .•• , .t. d. It h ..! ti .t k.r..:1 sespeintel is the ,reign of James 14. Oa: rtne.t arbitrary ot keir lungs. The exameles re O r . Tr r .,••",, r .• ,:,,,,, h “ nr .,..„ the I.:onse w.f. , - to 110 fr o -„! : n 1:• , ..i !,:::,7 , .w e ;7/5. Lord NUt;i....:4l', v.....!1 the. 1.. e! :•-!.. riA:pe:t f.ir the Secret Committee, could r,:e e i: ..i. this Bill. tle could not forget that the eviderise• b.:tere t!,at Com mittee vfas proposed and selected by Nliltist-rs :f e7l - (Hear.) The Ministers, it bad been tiet.y said, had pet' their country upon trial, and stood for. ward themselves, as evidence for the accusation. They instituted a most unbounded trial for high Treason, and are defeated, to the general satisfaction of the nation, ih a case where the wide would have gladly seen inflicted the punishment ut . All atr064415 riut.-- (Thar, hear.) ate of the worst consequences of the systemptlrstied was the of an odious race of spies, who had the inyodence to Accuse the people. But heyould ask the Ministers had they discovered any form - of adjuration, by which these accusers could be bound ? Ile had heard of the sentiments of the people oh this subject—that if an appeal were made to them, they would aeprove the b:11 But how could such an appeal be made with effect 1 The people were.,gagged—the pies% was gageed. • He did not deny that titiblic liberty had been kit • and enjoyed•during the present as telly AS •tt :tny period, hut he wotilir add .:that. public iih..irte %cis never in nreater dattA . Fi: th an :it present. ( li e ,r, he i r)..r. It was sail the pu.d.c rrimals were ciorapurd ; but was thi, enesedly :he cote option oi Goveroment e .a; the public p :vett). had becik cancel he its prolusion? The Alarm el dene-r from poeular axeteses was un. reasonable and vei.eiei. Ile would prefer "viii po puler commotion to those precedents of slyspotic power which ultimately (ermine"? in the ruin•of the Constitution. He would rather see hi; covnik y rye.)_ lutionised—(Cries of Hear, hear, front the Mini:ae r ial Benches)—he would rather see his country revoie tionised than enslaved—.(Hear, hear). The tide - of public opinion went too much on one side. Tim public mind appeared quite ineeuid when it touched the popular tile, Lint insensible to the encronchtbents of power. Till% %VAS the quarter from which he feared danger to the C-.o,tittitio n . Ile had given his opinion on thi. Bill—calling G. to Witness that he felt what he spoke--and with the impression that it would be a sort of treason t.) his country it lie (I'd not raise his voice to protest that liberty which was handed down to him front hi, forefathers, when he thought it exposed, as he new did, .to the most im minent danger—(/fear, hear). Mr. LAMB concurred its the sentiment, that he would rather see his coitntry reveletionited than en. slaved. l le would not go 'lvo any &A:tit of the I causes that had placed the country in it; present con dititni ; but the Jaeger was ulliosed - by all. Wilda Parliament was pelitiookal 14 L'iliveleal Sufrrage and .Innual P.itliatricills, ':heft v:.ii Ors bust l'etitionieg for Revolurion ? 'l•:.e state of the Public l'zess, too, greatly aided the rejects (t those who excited the people to sedition. Ile weuld not cep. c: a news paper to be Ire , ' from ticcal.io.i.il inters cf inadver. tency, and h. was wady to allow th.tt the Ness was, in vet y important p..ir..:, ctoidlict: , d with great can dour and fairness; Lot he w.;uld :;till usert, that in the Sunday siewsp:ti-Als, there was A system of Lk rreciating t!.e Coaitiunion, and rendetiog the peo . ;:le disconteated tvith. ii, patticul irly durii.t. ; the rek eks e; of Perliament. • Ile•woull recomm ncl t.. 'lith e :eh., concincted tlei rtels Anitenexini wl i it they s i of t , ot held forth 'to Icangs,en4.,:eikkistees, o drat tho•e e- ho poiseased great *power, exercised'st tinkl-r the vk .... ! ,, E iesporaibility..!:':H e ski ni n.et kart , liewever, r,, say, Viet the present; rfe..ahr eiceas id the Press; coeli in. duce liinOti isertirn POrfinllcetrL... - ' The 1 lf.:, .orable Oer.aensan-sOntluded ) ,with* 4hservi4, th.:t. I-..! ;r, p. ported p r 11/44,cbiti, : s.Vi4lettd. t o , isree : e e ‘,.,• ~„ riser meeting- si .;l3 Arlitiq44,..cqoeirsted - timr It nottra!, c s Cetitlynken'euteto•mk4lnorer ;,tirod in plieir;o,:e % I i l l iliet'House, th9 . l 4thtinereapettlei- L. i... i•. Mi. MAVNt s .M..4.4".curnreakreei,. resat they,.• -...." no . analogy betgs.!e 0 lima:CV:4v' Ml , iP:llt:ons e . :: th.• 1 1 - labeasCOrpos qq, : yoti, th;odoili Trp0 . i.%1.. k„,.. ! Oil! tli. • aegrenfveni?.....ttuf al.:ate:le 120./...!..; Aft i has litclos . sylpeolvu 0., tine, .of v.qtr, therefore y. 41 Slibt . litiSttytillY it...lllt*Aptit peerree• • itf, ,frica'ds'ili,sere,inns(ity,;; ti-ii:o:}jo4‘;',.f.°:::4ltYw4o,:yilie7ll:sr.4.:l7thhastrb't:lieZtl,pended r. ti.tx il l ' s i l o : j.:,lrsal i r. u i t t i . :l ... 7..;:; i s t t .,l lo:Tilk' S. :s:l : Af ' , g , ct : :— . ::( N i iitifia;.s:6lrt re ; r94 : h o l i r i j :) . :lll: i :c . 1 : %,.. i:::: .. ... i • ' g:. - ..cy. li . e wa.), 12 , 1 ul z !. .e.htithed•prole.:sio n , Ira ;:•• t : 1 „ tt 0 ; t ~ 4.a 4:4gen:e entergeney"jeite mean 50P1t• suc!) case as thil: u; a ciiiptized :dynasty o.iit ,L v el,,e people, not the di.c.eitehr ne partial . a :::11,6., is jjll:2 lahnurets and artizans, driven' ;01 0 -jc,ig.,s as b:1:11 as criminal by their disirexs. r.e ineatut e now proposed by Mi!:;:-.ters' would tholt - ace o , e people or England in the eyes n:' i. reigo Powe• s. He had often asked how the •§usteliiiko of the 11?- beas Corpus could. be (kernel :t rtoie.l t r applicable to the discontents of the e ,, nniry, :old he never could receive an anitver—( Hear, It, .e, her:..)... There was every reason ..,r the rcan..v A l of the Mi. iii-Atr, Let none for his !wins; a Dietator—(ediours at :( l er i tu e: si:nu e di , hear).— In every a:.;e, Wiie : l , l lv il as st s e t p ill w d . was e m p a r d: 1 1 , ' } : : ::,1, t i . ; 1 1 . , ..... t o al d n y c i : ::i o n t t : e c k I t il t h s :: s . s t e:c o ' i z a i r t : t t y e ut i i the i : ste peo r s wouldple—