Star. — London, England, 1822-11-06 00:00:00

= l"r— or "'" • d POETR Y. The stillest streme descriei the greatest deep, The clearest *bye is subject to a shows*; Conceits most swete, when as it seems to sleeve, .And fairest dayes do in the moralise Imre. The 'silent groves swete nymphes they cannot raw, For Love loves moste when love moats secrete is! The rarest jewels hidden virtue yeilde.; . The swete of trailique is a secret gable ; The yeare once old dotbe shewe a barren field, And plants seem dede, and yet they syringe spine• Cepide is blinde ;—the reason why, is this, Love loves moste when Love moste secrete is I • POLICE INTELLIGENCE. The following lines are extracted froth small volume of fugi tive ancient Poetry, printed in the year 1147, b T. Son London Bridge: The kaintalnes smoske, and yet no flames tliey showe; Sturm shyne by nighte, the undiscern'd:by daye, And trees do "tinge, yet are not seen to grewe, And shadowes moove, although they seem to Kaye• In winter's woe is buried summer's blysse, And Love loves mate when love moste secrete is! Mertstmellousz.—Yesterday, a lad about 19 years of age was brought 'before the Loen Mavoa, on a charge of having robbed a country lad of all he possessed. A country youth, sf great simplicity of manner, stated that his name was Robert Allen Mitchell, and that he came from near St. lye's, in Cornwall. It appeared, from his answers to the Loses MATO& that he had just left school, and that his parents had determined upon sending him to seek his fortune in London. On his way he fell in with the prisoner, who being apparently in great distress he paid for him, but who took the opportunity of snaking off with his watch, and, getting up to London before the prosecutor, obtained, in his name, the bag containing his clothes, dcc. from the Spread Eagle. The Loma Mevoe was astonished at the monstrous ingratitude of the prisoner; and asked him what he had to say to the charge of having robbed one who so charitably fed him? The prisoner (in a sneering tone) replied—" What I have to say I will reserve for a future period." The I.onn Meroa remanded him• for further examination, that the officer might have an opportunity of recovering the un fortunate youth's property. Bow-STREET.—In July, the Porto Wl° public-horse, in St. Martin's-lane, was broken into, and cash and notes to the amount of 343 1 . stolen. In a few days a 40/. and a 101. note .were traced through various hands to one Hunt, servant to e r. Ingram, the landlord of the Rising Sun, in I3edfordbuty . Hunt, on being taken before the Magistrates, said, he had taken them from his master, who absconded, and no tidings were heard of Trim till Tuesday se'nnight, when he was secured. punt, who ffiad been discharged in the first instance, was then sought for; but, having heard of the apprehension of his old master, he also absconded. Ancther of the stolen notes has since been traced to him. Mr. ISAACS, for the prisoner, contended the evidence only affected Hunt, and if he were in custody, he could not be evidence against his client. The Magistrate thought, however, the circumstances warranted his detention.. Bail vas offered, but refused, and he was remanded. J. Harris was ordered to find bail for assaultitil tba Patrols while seizing Ingram. MARY-LA- Boas,. ()rms.—Yesterday Sohn Duckworths-an,el - man, of shabby genteel exterior, was charged before the sitting Magistrate, F.natesn Gets-netts, Esq. with extorting money from a poor woman, named Judith Foy, under pretence of procuring bail for a relation of hers, and another man, who v.. re committed for an assault to the New Priseti, Clerkenwell. Judith Foy, the poor woman who had been 'defrauded, stated that she Wes; on the 98th September, at the Sessions-house, when come parties were drawing their recoguirances, and putting in bail, Ike she made some observations, which etrractine the at tention of the prisoner, lie asked her whether she watited bail fee any friend ? she answered at the of ; he then said he could bail her friends, or get souse party to bail them. Witnessaceom panied bins to a public-house, where he ate and.drank at her ex pense, and promised to procure the bail fie a sum i s : 61. she bad other meetings with prisoner, once at her house, where he dined. On the Ist of October, she again met the prior at a public house near this Office, and he then informed her that 6/. would be wanted, to pay in the following manner, namely, 21. to iluckeridge, the officer, to make the matters right; 53. as a fee to the Office Clerk, and the remainder to the bail and himself for his trouble. Ile also remarked that 1/. es. would be imme diately wanted to begin the affair, as he wished to give the offi cer half the bribe. She then paid him 255. in part, and he gave bee a receipt. Ile called at her house en 'the following week, a;:c1 on the Thursday brought two persons to bail the men, to whoin she was obliged to give 7s. Cd. for their trouble. These psemns were proved before the Maeistrates to ha what is termed " stag bail," and were refused. Ile on another day got two other persons, and she deposited, after paying several charges, in the hands of a publican, 31. to give the prisoner, should the bail be taken, but the persons on being asked did nut know whom they were to bail, and were not accepted. This testimony was confirmed by ether witnesses. The prisoner, in his defence, denied he had any intention of fraud, and said the money was received by him to pay certili cetes and other expenses. The Magistrate expressed his indignation at the baseness of the prisoner's conduct, in robbing a poor woman and leading her about feasting at her expense.—lk was committed for trial. Isesterra-searaw—A poor fellow, bedaubed with mud, and having his face painted, applied to the Sitting Magistrate, JOHN lIARDMICL, Esq. for redress under the following circumstances: —lt appeared from the applicant% statement, that lie was a town carter, and that he was sitting at home at his breakfast inWhite's yard, Rosemary-lane, yesterday morning,when a person came in and told bins lie was winded, in i great hurry, by a person in the lane. Ile consequently ran out, but had no sooner got into the lane than he was seized by a gang of ruffians, who cried out, o Sow,boys, we've got a Guy without any further trouble."— They theq pinioned both his arms, and having painted his face, put on his head a paper cap, and placed him in an old arm chair, to which they strapped him fast with leather straps, saying that, in the course of the day, they meant to burn hints as the effigy cif Guy Fawkes, in commemoration of the Gunpowder Plot.— Baying thus prepared biro, they ran two poles out in the arms of the chair, and four of them hoisting it on their shoulders, they carried him for upwards of an hour from door to door, stirnugh the neighbourhood. lie was at length rescued by an offieer, who chanced.to be passing. The Magistrate said it was a most daring case, and ordered a wit rant for the apprehension of the four ringleaders. Wonsitri-son'sres—stiery Louisa Tkomimon, residing in Dog row, Bethnal-green, was charged with telling the fortune of 'a Police-officer.. B. filleed, One of the constables of this Office, related, that having received information of this Sybil, be went on Monday to her 'louse, observing, that he was recommended to liar by a person just by for the purpose of having his fortune ' told.' Prevkius to proceeding to 'busii.ess, however, the impostor demanded sonic gin; and having each- taken a glass of the in spiring liquid, she asked him what was his wish? Ile replied, to be married to a young woman who was then%vaiting for him at a neighbouring public-house. Cards were then called for, and after cutting and shuffling them, she talked in the usual slang, d dark men, fair women; &c. in a manner too disgusting for re . petition. Suffice it to say, that the officer being tired of her ca balistic jargon, gave her two marked shillings, when young Armstrong stepped in and conducted her before the Magistrate, who to convince her that she was as ignorant of her own fate ay that of others, sent her to hard labour for six months in thst, House of Correction. _ • Monday night, a fire broke out on the premises of llodgson, iron-founder. at Shadwell, but the speedy ,rrival of the engines confined it to the part where it ' _first broke out, which was quite gutted. The chemists and druggists of Newcastle, and Any other places, have come to a resolution never sell oxalic acid, except in a liquid state, which will prevent the common and fatal accident of mistaking, :t for Epsom salts. A law to enforce this plan is hlydesirable. Mr.l arrit -first 111 6 1.1 13 tO pores it fc bigt pognapiwnmerpogi.."•t'./r••-=•"* --- row" 140184, • . COURT, OF : glltii*lt *Oribigint• & oeituavou OW. IRISTAIIIatiI4 • After the bearing of the tortimillitfr came (which appeared in our Paper of yesterdays, the remainder of the tune _of the Court was occupied itt discussing whether Mr. Basil Montague had Ailitetra: brie( im- Meetly in a case against which he had received reusioui•:: It was introduced to the Court by Mr. Honsanithe petition of Mr. Lloyd in the matter of Glover,. but Ins Lordship called upon him to skew statute or Common law to prove that he hid a right to decide•at all. :It was a very important question, whether the Lord Chancellor had jorildiction to com pel tho , Blir , to do right, or to restrain them from doing wrong?. He was rather of opinion that it be longed to the twelve Judges. If the parties con sented, he might give his opinion as having had ex ' Those matters. • - rysi • • • 'perience in • The ATTORNEF•GENERAL, on the part of Mr. Mon ire, wished to wave every objection as to his Lord ship's jurisdiction. • The LORD CHANCELLOR.-+-If he should •be asked his opinion as John, Lord Elden, he would give it. This was a case of bankruptcy. He did not say the question might not come before him in another form. Every day he interfered in • the case of Solicitors, and there might be cases to call for interference in the case of Counsel. He would hear the case as an indi vidual, but he would not regard it as a petition in bankruptcy. Mr. HORNE then proceeded to state the circum stances set forth in the petition. In the bankruptcy of Mr. Glover, Mr. Lloyd was a creditor to a consi derable amount. Mr. Lloyd took the opinion of Mr. Montague in the matter, and gave him a retainer. — Mr. Montague attended twelve meetings of the Com- i missioners in the character of Counsel for Mr. Lloyd. On the 22d of February last there was a meeting of the Commissioners upon the subject of the bankrupt's final examination. On the 20th preceding a retainer was given to Mr. Montague for the banks upt, and on theAlst a brief and fee. Mr. Lloyd having a debt to prove against the bankrupt's estate, had not in tended to give a brief to Mr. Montague for the meet ing of Commissioners, but he• complained that Mr. Montague took a brief for the interest against which he had been contesting, and hai received a retainer. The Loan CHANCELLOR said, nothing could be clearer than that the r e could be no objection to the second retainer. If a Counsel had a retainer from one party and no brief, and if he took a retainer and brief from the other, it was quite right, provided he gave notice to the party who gave bim the first re tainer. It might• be a question whether a notice must be given of necessity. The general understanding was that there must be a notice. His Lordship stated his own experience on the Northern Circuit. It was a floating idea that no retainer bound beyond twelve months, but they of the North had net been so sharp. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL disclaimed it for the Western Circuit. The ATTORNEY-GENKRAL, Mr. Tnestovr, and Mr. MONTAGUE spoke on the other side. The last Gentleman mentioned, as an instance of the evils of retaining, that the late Lord Lonsdale had retained the whole Northern Circuit against a Lake-poet, Mr. Wordsworth. - • The Loan CHANCELLOR, after having repeated all the circumstances of the case, gave it as his clear opi nion that no blame could be attached to Mr. Mon tague. The necessity of the notice depended very much on the nature of the case. It appeared that Mr. Lloyd's attorney did in fact know that a brief was given to Mr. Montague, and did not himself mean to give him a brief. Mr. Reddish, the attor ney, acted upon an idea which many held, but it was an erroneous one. He had known the greatest evils occasioned by retainers when great men it that Court oppressed little men. The understanding and prac tice of the Bar were founded in reason, and for the benefit of the Public, not of the Bar. During forty six years that he had been in the profession, this was the first time the question was publicly discussed be fore any Court. It was against all prictice and prin ciple that a retainer should preclude Counsel from taking a brief. The evils of such a doctrine proved to demonstration that nothing could be worse, what , ever prima facie aspect the contrary practice had, and he admitted that there was something unpleasant [in it. Here the retainer had been io a matter of bankruptcy. By the way, the poor bankrupt gave a larger fee than the rich creditor. It was quite con sistent to bold a retainer for the bankrupt; and for Lloyd. The observations of Mr. Lee, attorney for the bankrupt, ought not to have prevented Mr. Red dish from•communicating with Mr. Montague. There could be no obligation of confidence in such a trans action. Mr. Montague, too, mentioned to the Com missioners at once the painful situation in which he stood, and offered to refer the case then. No blame whatever could be imputed. Mr. Morcrar.;ua said he did not ask costs. . COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 5. THE KING SET? N. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE came Into Court spe cially to try this case at half-past nine. Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL addressed the Jary.— The defendant, Mr. Seton, vos charged by the in dictment with perjury', committed in answer to a bill filed in equity by the prosecutor, Mr. Barclay Far quharson. The bill, which bore date on the 13th of 'August, 1818, alleged that Mr. Sewn had been ton sected with the house of Messrs. Barclay Farquhar;. :son and Co. merchants in the West Indies, and had considerable dealings with them previous to the year 1797 ; and it also alleged that Mr. Seton had re ceived 19,2001. and 4,0001. for which crei!it had not been given. Upon these allegations interrogatories were framed, to which Mr. Seton hid given replies In his answer ; and on these replies arose the per jury of which he was now indicted. There were three diitinet assignments of perjury —first, as to Mr. Se edn's dealings with Messrs. Barclay Farquharson and Co. previous sto the year 1797 ; second, as to the sum of 12,2001. and third a as to the sum of 4,0901.. ia,answev to the interrogatory respecting the dealings "with Messrs. Farquharson and Co. previous t 0.1797 Mr. Seton had ventured to•swear that he hadsno con ! Inexion with the firm before that period, but admitted that he had a bill and Cash traasactiou with the firm in 1797, and afierwards other trimaetions, which he; proceeded to specify relative to estate called the Dumferlean estate. Now it would be &hewn by the • • • • ••• shewn that _ had sworn falsely ; and it would be for the Jury to decide whether he did so from any failure of memory, any inadvertence or . Mistake, or wilfully and with A eximioal . design. If the transactions had been of a trivial nature, they might be supposed, in charity, to - have been forgotten; but when they extended to many thousands of pounds, could it be conceived by the most charitable that they had escaped the memory ? He (the Solicitor-General) understood that it was sot to be denied to-day that these transactions existed ; but it was to be insisted that Mr. Seton misconceived the interrogatory, by supposing that it alluded to ir partnership, and not to general dealings ; but if so, why did he, when he denied the existence of such transactions previous to 1797, proceed to specify a transaction since that time which had no relation to partnership? Besides, even if the interrogatory were understood as applying to partnership, the contract of the 21st May, 1796, would be entirely within its meaning. The other two assignments related to the, sale of an estate of. Mr. Sewn in the isle of Grenada, and the bills which had been given at several times for the price ; but these arose out of a most extensive and complicated account ; and, after the mast anxi ous consideration of the case and consultation with his learned friends, he felt that, whatever might be his opinion ,painfully and laboriously acquired, he could not p r esent the case as applicable to these points in any intelligible form to the Jury by means of evidence. He,therefore should abandon these, and desire the Jury, in justice to the defendant, to dismiss them entirely from their minds. As to the first as signment, he should proceed to call his witnesses : in a case of this description he should not, he ought not, contend with any zeal or passion ; he was only anxious that the case should be understood,and having• endeavoured to lender it intelligible, he should leave it to be dealt with as they should find it to deserve. The bill filed by Mr. Barclay Farquharson on the 18th of August, 1818, was then produced from the office. It was against his late partners as well as against Mr. Seton, and its principal object was to have an account of tire sums charged on the Dum ferlean estate, and to be allowed to redeem it on paying them. It prayed also generally.for an account, and that the defendants might answer its allegations. Mr. SOLICITOR•GENERAL asked whether Mr. Scar lett wished the whole bill to be read, or only such parts as were applicable to the matter on whichTer jury was assigned? Mr. SCARLETT said, he had no wish to take up the time of the Court, by unnecessarily reading a docu ment of great length which did not apply to the matter in issue. But he wished the Counsel for the prosecution would state what connexion the answer to this interrogatory had with the object of the bill, and how the matter assigned for perjury became at all mater;al to the result of the proceedings? Mr. GURNEY submitted, that the defendant bad admitted the interrogatory to be material, by not de murring to it as impertinent. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.." 0 no, that is not enough by any means to fix him with it as material. Here are eight or ten page; of interrogatories; to which of them must I refer ?" ' Mr. SCARLETT.—There are about 270 interroga tories, my Lord. The bill is for the redemption of the Duniferlean estate, and how this matter applies to that estate is in no way shewn. The prayer of the bill was then read, and appeared in substance as we haie stated already. Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL said, that he must admit, that the object of the bill was to redeem the Dum ferlean estate ; and that the interrogatory on the an swer to which peijury was assigned was unconnected with that estate ; but the bill also alluded to certain mercantile transactions; in reference to which the in terrogatory was framed. Mr. SCARLETT thought it right to state, that the defendant, amidst all those interrogatories, had not adverted to this disconnected question, which had no reference to the chief matter in issue. But when an amended bill was filed, and his attention particularly called to the transactions previous to 1797, he had given the most full, explicit, and satisfactory account of them in his amended answer. Mr. SOLICITOR-GENERAL said, that if the Lord Chief Justice thought the statement assigned as per jury immaterial, be would net proceed further. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE replied, that it was one thing to say that the allegation was so disconnected from the matter in dispute as to be wholly irrelevant, and another to say that it might fairly be regarded as not presenting itself as material to the defendant's -mind. He certainly could not, without reading the whole of the ioluagnoirs bill, take upon himself to decide that, in point Of law, the allegation was im material; but he shonld;, perhaps, were he sitting in the Jury-box, think that enough appeared to strew that Mr. Sewn had very probably answered the in terrogatory, amidst so tnaliy,directed - to anotherpoint, without any design to swear falsely. When, at the end of such an immense number of a defendant found a prayer for the redemption of a particular estate, as a reasonable man he might fairly think this interrogatory as to past mercantile trans actions, so unimportant . as not to direct his particular attention t 6 its subject. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL said that, if this was the impressicin on his Lordship's mind; be should press -the case no further. Mr. SCARLETT acknowledged the candour which the Solicitor-General had manifested in the conduct i;if the prosecution, and which, indeed, marked all his professional exertions. For his own client he must be allowed to say, that if the other two assignments Of perjury, which alone were material, had not been abandoned, he was prepared in the clearest manner to prove the truth of what he had sworn. For this purpose he had spared no expense; he had sent for numerous witnesses from Martinique, who were in Court, and he was ready to meet the charge in the fullest manner. This statement was due to a mans of high birth, ti c large fortune, and of unspotted eharacter s • who only regretted Tat his answer to ... 11"-.-r. -- - - ; - . - , • ' - ""/"/"Ir•r7 .r...,,,,,,. .. . . .. . . . . . , •"••.. - • the fats he was per , administering inconvenience to help it. lie then . ground do which defendant acquittal. TheJur: of Not Guilty. DOWN-HA, _ OCTOBER ;a. SEDUCTIOIT.—ASCMUERS V. RUSSELL. A Writ *f inquiti of damages in an action for the sedection of the plaintiff's datighter by the defendant, Was this day ezecnted before %V. EASTLAKS, Esq. and a common Jury's The plaintiff, Mrs. Ann Summers; widow, and the defendant, Mr. Thomas Russell, vic tialler, both reside at Stonehouse. The defendant ilving suffered judgment to go by default, the plain tiff was entitled, of course, to the verdict of the Jury, consequently it only remained for them to assess the quantum of damages according to the circumstances of the case, which were as follow: It appeared in evidence, that in August, 1819, the plaintiff's daughter, then only sixteen years of age; went to reside with her brother, Mr. Richard Sum mers, who kept the Commercial Inn, on the quay at Stonehouse, but being confined through illness, his sister conducted the business on his account. Dining this time, the defendant was in the daily habit of vi siting the house, and being a married man with a large family, and professing great friendship for the plaintiff and her connexions, he was received there with the greatest cordiality. In November follev.ing, *the defendant succeeded in effecting his wicked de signs, and the illicit intercourse was continued until January last. In the meanwhile the greatest misfor tunes had befallen the plaintiff's family : her husband became insolvent, and was suddenly taken from her by death; her son Richard had failed in business, and been consigned to a prison ; and, to complete the 'climax of her misery, her daughter, whoni she had taken home with her after her son's misfortunes, wis discovered to be pregnant. In May last theplaintiLl's daughter was delivered of a female child, and the defendant being sworn to as the father, he cautioned to allow a small weekly sum for the child's mainte nance until its death, which took place in a few weeks. The Learned Counsel, Mr. BIRD, addressed the Jury in mitigation of damages, and called many wit nesses for defendant, but nothing was elicited which could materially affect the evidence of the plaintiff's daughter, who underwent a strict cross-examination, and was at last carried out in .hysterics. • The Learned Sheriff summed_ up, and the Jury havirtz retired for half an hour, returned a verdict of—Damages £75. • . .. t i "l l : l •l'llt .r.: , :tai at t i een n :: ll 11 Pg 4 7 7 11 ,196b.imat.tuazt'aceitraon4.pth,traahtlailiertfillelfrieri!hnmic.:171611:;;afig.art4peitobbritir4;t:On;:wal411:pit1;7;97eialts..0.11pocuersuete;:111:107321: jo i ;ll : ii • apti :Th yb t ; c • ny dbli d w ia jviuv i r eryst al l i : so .Ct .l 7 ll4 ll;rodtby 7 utwc J: eh cede when T rd n ot i i . h a se ct tres : ed . m siil be' sno ,:i r a e t .h t f iven inel : polial h irt l .v e m n .e f ties, in which Mr. Seton was to advance 510,0001. shortly poipted vett° the Jury the ground g and, at a certain period, to hart a return of his Ca- the defendant was entitled to an acquittal. i" pital and two-fifths of the profiti. It would thus be The Jury instantly returned arerdict of 3 , ._ ____: 1 A I._ C..... •km Lows Pr, leolitirvrmir_—turACUEßS O. RtritlEL a shewn that in ,hisonswer upon this point Mr.seton TOWN-HALL (PLYMOUTH DOCK) , OCT, INSOLVENT. DEBTORS' COURT. . Yesterday WilMum R ickards was opposed by Mr. HaAnt, onliebilf of Mr. Tobias And other creditors. The insolvent statedliehis etamiaation, that he was the Captain of a West Indiaman, belonging to a Mr. Miller. In February, 1822, when about to sail to the West Indies, he took a do onometer and three gold watches, chains, &c. from Mr. Tobias, cf disposing of them abroad. They amounted to He also took a quantity of boots from another credi tor, named Jessop, to the amount of 170/. for a simi lar purpose, for which he gave Mr. Jessoo a bill upca his employer for 801. which was accepted, but is nit yet due. In November, 1821, he called a rnee:ing; of his creditors: he then owed about 700/. to whErls amount he had property in the West Indies, consist ing of cash 1101. upwards of 2001. in Madeira wine; 101. worth of tin ware; 30/. 0r.40/. worth - of slop:; 12 dozen port wine; 100 gallons Geneva; and 34/. worth corks. He bad left these things in the pov.es sion of a Mr. Edwards, in the isle of St. Vincent, but upon his going out this year, he was informed that vermin had eaten the corks, the port wine was broken, the Geneva gone, the slops destroyed, the tin ware lost, and part of the Madeira leaked. Notwithstand ing this unsatisfactory account of his propel ty, he gave Mr. Edwards a fresh investment of property to the amount of 100/. He left him about two•thirds of the boots, and one of the gold watches. The other two watches (worth 301. each), and the remainder of the boots, he gave to a girl of colour to take into the Interior of the island to dispose of for him ; and as he could not End this-hawker on his coming away, he did not enter her in his schedule as his debtor, think ing the property she had lost. He did not know her name. She was sometimes called Mary, sometime: Nancy, and sometimes other names. She lived where she could." No witness was present when he gave Ler the articles ; he took no receipt from her for them, nor did he tell her how much she was to sell them for. After the insolvent had underwent a long exami nation upon this subject; and as to what furniture, &c. he had, and after Mr. Tobias and other of the opposing creditors deposed to the circumstances under .which he obtained credit, as well as to the apparent nature of his furniture, the case was ordered to stand over to the 18th instant, for theinsolvent to amend his schedule with respect to the mulatto hawker, and to bring forward persons to prove whether or not the identical articles of furniture seen by his creditors et his house are now forthcoming. Nov. 1, in Cadogan-plge, the Countess of Bective, of a Goa and heir. , March 11,. at Mangalore, the Lady of Lieut.-Colonel Bolen Dowall, of a son. MARRIED. May 30, at Bombay, John Shepherd, Esq. Commander of ; *.e Hon. East India Company's ship Berwickshire, to Anne, ter of James Stevens, Esq. senior Judge of the Courts Ai•p , 'ai and Circuit for the province of Malabar. Oct. 31, at St. John's, Hackney, Thomas Jortin Roberts. eldest son of the Rev. Thomas Roberts, of Chelmsford, to I.ou!-i, seconds:laughter of the Rev. J. S. Piercy, Chaplain to Bunhat- . fields burying-grounds DIED. Monday, se'nnight, of an infhunmation in the brain, at rens burst, where he had beet_ following his usual avocation, rtir Thomas Barnes, Land Surveyor, late of Jpswleh, in the 4C:h year of ' his ago ' AIAL LtA ' MM. nu S. AM.- lg. a Dublin ' 1 0 France 0 0 Waterford •• 1 • 0 Harnburgh '''. 1 I Guernsey and Jersey 0 0 ilinders 0 0 Lisbon . • , 9 Al Malta 0 0 Holland - * 0 Gottenburgh 0 1 Leeward Islands 0, 0 1 Jonah* - o • te 110 Vt 24 . 1X61. Sk LIMN MTh t h•v. . CMOS • - 46 minutia aims 7 Aftencen - 7 minutes after 8 C.).Not. :. Fri:iced and publlihedahr Urns Nu r, Floitto , place, Tempie-Batt -