Star. — London, England, 1810-08-16 00:00:00

e - , • - ktfazipir, Aususrn. A ReqUisition to the Sheriffs of the City of Dublin b now signing, for the purpose of requesting them to call an aggregate meeting, to take into consideration what measures are most proper to be adopted as ope rative to the repeal of the Union. ROBERT LANGRISHE, Esq. son of the Right Hon. Sir HERCULE% LANGRISHE, has been appointed a Com missioner of Excise, in the room of the late JOHN TOWNSHEND I Esq. • , ASSIZES. CHELMSFORD, TUESDAY, AUGUST 14. Last night Lord ELLRNROIMUGH and Lord Chief Baron M‘DoNatn, came to this town to hold the Assizes. This morning after Divine service, they proceeded to their respective Courts. The Lord Chief Baron - sat at Nisi Prins, and Lord Era.Exao novou on the Crown side. NISI PRIUS NIDE. TILE KING V. RALPII DOTID. This was an indictment against Mr. It. Dodd, the engineer, for an assault upon Mr. Paul Law, a clerk to the Colchester Water-work Company. Mr. Serjeant BEST, for the prosecution, stated that the defendant, Mr. It. Dodd, was formerly employed as engineer to the Colchester Water-work Company, but had been dismissed. The prosecutor, Mr. Paul Law, was clerk to the Company, and h e received directions from the Com mittee of the Company not to let Mr. Dodd have the . key of the Works. Accordingly, when Mr. Dodd came to Colchester and applied - to the clerk for the key of the works, the prosecutor informed him that he had received directions not to let him have it.— Ikon this Mr. Dodd immediately seized him by the collar, dragged him about the house, and with many menaces, beat and mal-treated him in the most shame ful manner. Mr. Paul Law, the prosecutor, was called, who gave evidence of the facts nearly as they had been stated by the Counsel for the prosecution. On cross examination by Mr. GARROW, he said he had lived in various places, but he could not remember the times when, &c. and he admitted that Mr. Dodd had introduced him to the place which he held. Mr. GARROW, for the defendant, admitted that a verdict must go against his client, but insisted that he was provoked, being an irritable man, to shake the 46 impertinent puppy," whom they had witnessed giv ing his evidence. The Lord enter BARON told the Jury, that all that he and they had to do was to say, whether the • defendant had committed an assault ? the Court of Xing's Bench would weigh the merits of the case when they came to pronounce their judginsint. The Jury found the defendant guilty. THE KING V. T. DODD. This was also an indictment for an assault against Mr. T. Dodd, the son of the above defendant, upon the same prosecutor, Mr. Paul Mr. Gattaow was for the prosecutor in this cause, and stated to the Jury, that it was nothing like the last, except in the surname of the defendant. In this case, a young man, without any provocation, in the most gross manner insulted the prosecutor, who was merely in tha discharge of his duty. Mr. Paul Law was then called, who stated that Mr. T. Dodd having been in the employ of the Col chester Waterwork Company, came home late one evening, but was refused admittance by the prosecu tor on account of the lateness of the hour. The next day he came there, and was cutting some leather on the dresser ; the prosecutor told him to desist, or he would turn him out of doors. Dodd replied, he would stab him if he attempted it, and flourished the knife so near his face that it would have cut him, if he had not drawn back. The witness then got b ehind him, pinioned his arms, and thrust him out of doors. Mr. MARRYATT, fiir the defendant, said, that, in his apprehension, this cause was pretty much like the last. The prosecutor here seemed to be just the same de impertinent puppy" as - before, and all the assault he sustained was in defence of Mr. Dodd's right of possession, which certainly he was as well entitled to , held as the prosecutor, the Company having given' them both apartments in the same house. The Learned Judge said both cases seemed to him to be exactly alike, and the Jury would say whether there was an assault or not Verdict—Guilty. CUMMING V. DUFF. This was an action against the defendant for not suffering the plaintiff to carry off some hay which he had left on the defendant's premises. It appeared that the 'defendant had taken a house of the plaintiff, at Padnells, in this county, upon which he had left a rick of hay, which he sold to a Mr. Yull ; and, as lie alledged, the plaintiff refused to let Mr. Yull carry it away. It appeared, however, that Mr. Duff had never refused his permis..ion : and Mr. Yull, who was called for the plaintiff, said, that Mr. Duff was al ways willing to let him have iz, but he did not fetch it away sooner, because it was not convenient for himself. Mr. GAIIROW said, as the plaintiff had proved no case, he was entitled to have him nonsuited ; but lie must say a few words on behalf of Mr. Duff, who was an Attorney of the Court. The plaintiff, Mr. Cumming, was a rich Nabob, and formerly employed Mr. Duff as .his Attorney ; but because he had of fended him, he gratified his malignity by the present action, He had brought another action against Mr. Duff, in the Court of - King's Bench, in London, and having directed his Counsel to utter many calumnies against him, he then agreed to refer it to arbitration. Mr. Garrow said he had known Mr. Duffconductinf . _ _ committed; andihot while his wife. was but. for adapt two hours in the middle of the day, the prisoner broke into the house, by making a hole through the wall. which wits only of lath and plaister, and carried 9ff the articles in question. The Jury found him guiliy, ander a very humane charge from Lord ELLENto- ROUGIi, it appearing that the prisoner was driven to the commission of the offence by the extrehre of hun ger. In order to relieve, as much as possible, the agony of the prisoner's mind, who was in tears during the whole of the trial, his Lordship immediately passed sentence of death on him, but with an intima tion that mercy would be extended to him. Jame: Carter was indicted for stealing 15 wether sheep, the property of the Rev. Francis Stanley, of Eastwick. In this case the prisoner had driven the sheep stolen across the country to Romford market, where he had sold them, professing himself to wish to get rid of them, as he was going to Brentwood fair. The sheep being missed in the morning after they were stolen, and Romford market being the only one held on that day, inquiry was made there, the sheep were found, and pursuit was made after the prisoner to Brentwood fair, whither he said he was going.— Being taken into custody at Brentwood, he confessed the robbery, and restored the money he had received for the sheep to the man who had bought them. The Jury found him guilty—Death. patty causes for the same Mr. Cumming, and he had always known him to have been diligent and honour- Able in the conduct of them, though Mr.' Cumming was. now his enemy ; and be thought the present ac tion would afford a sufficient specimen of the temper of his mind. The Lord Ca= ZARON obeerved, that this was a . . lege, ta assist wlth.thelr horses in working the s. lands ; therefore, that the largest holder of land the right to turn ont the largest number of cattle, a, WI proportion. The Court deCided that the Jury should give a ver dict for the defendant, admitting a right to the house holders generally as they had proved it, and an extra right to the farmers, agreeably to the usual custom of levancy and couchancy. Two other causes of the like nature, in which the same person was named as plaintiff, were entered for trial ; but were settled on the principle of the above, without being brought beforodeCourt —a right being reserved to question the evidence arising from the parchment agreement, on the presumption that the custom of the common is more ancient. DOl e ON Till DENISE OF JOH:: PAULDING V. BRISTOW. This was an action of ejectment, to recover pos session of an estate in the parish of Goxhill in this county, consisting of 154 acres of land, free and :copyhold. The case was tried at the last Lent Assizes last year, when the plaintiff lost his suit in consequence of not being able to shew a clear line of ancestry. In this, however, be now completely succeeded, by pro ducing a genealogical tree of great clearness, not withstanding its amazing dimensions. Mr. Justice Gnome, on observing this document spread on the table of the Court, said, he as as very happy it had not been put in his hands, when the case was stated to him on the evening before. Serjeant VAUGHAN replied, it had been carefully kept out of his Lordship's sight, for fear it might have deprived him of rest I The plaintiff, Mr. Ro be' t Faulding, was shewn by this genealogy to be lineally descended, through eight generations, from Robert and Margaret, the common ancestors of the claimant, and of John Faulding, the person last in possession of the estate in question. In order to establish the direct descent, it was found ne cessary to produce, in Court, registers of births, mar riages, and deaths, out of number, and several wills from the Ecclesiastic Registry, all which were sworn to and read. A moro tedious process can hardly be imagined ; but it was relieved beyond expectation by the humour of the Councel engaged in the action— Serjeant Vaughan and Mt. Copley on the one side, .and Mr. Clarke and Mr. Reader on the other, beguiled the tediousness of the case. In tracing the genealogy, the word riepor had been translated nephew ; and in the will this nrpo: appeared to be " John, the son of my son John ;" this matter was set right by the Serjeant's observing, that he was an Irish nephew—for the ori ginal stock had been moved from Ireland dining the prosecution of the Protestants, and had been settled in this country, where they had breached out very extensively, and had acquired considerable property. The plaintiff having thus set up his claim, which was admitted to be perfectly correct, the Defers'. dant's Counsel stated, that his client was also descended from the same stock, and through four or five generations in the same line ; but that his claim. was prior, because more nearly related to the person - from whom they had both shot out. Proof of this was to be given by copies and extracts, as in the case of the plaintiff; but in this genealogy much greater confusion appeared than in the longer one, for want of some registers, which could not be found. The principal difficulty rested in one woman (Eliza beth), she having been married twice, and no register or memorandum of her first marriage being pro duced ; of course in the register of her second mar riage, her name was different from her maiden name ; but several collateral circumstances were adduced, which went to shew her to be the identical person the defendant wished her to appear to be. It consisted chiefly in the testimony of a number of very old peo ple, who deposed that their grandmother's maiden name was Faulding, and that the families of the Wor rells, the Robinsrins, and the Fauldings, were always esteemed to be related—were cousins : a will was also produced to shew that two women, whose relation. ship could no otherwise be proved, were sisters. In this way a strong presumptive ground was established that the defendant was descended as stated by the Serjeant. To this ground Mr. CLARICE totally objected, on the principle that it was no better than hear-say evi dence, and could not be received in a Court of Law. Here a great question-arose between the Counsel. Serjeant VAUGHAN maintained, that the report of old people, of who their ancestors were, and whether any relationship subsisted between their families and others, was evidence perfectly admissible; and that if persons will swear that they beard their father or me ther say they were descended from any particular CHAPMAN V. CONLAM. person, it was right in law to presume they were so The question involved in this cause was one ofcon - descended, en whit was termed " reputation in the siderable interest. The nature of the action will be col- family. ,, lected from the following sketch :—ln the reign of Charles I. a grant was made to a Dutchman of 1-3 d Mr. CLARKE objected, thA by this kind of evidence of a certain piece of land,. situated near Crowle, and any man was liable at any time to be dispossessed of usually under water, on condition of his effecting an his property, by a combination of persons who would embankment, and a perfect drainage of the whole— swear up to the mark. the property so acquired has descended to Lord Man. On the validity of such testimony, so hnportant in. vers, the present Lord of the Manor, under whom the the present cause, Mr. Justice Goose declared that he Defendant and others hold farms. There are in must always admit as evidence whatever was convey- Crowle it seems 300 houses, 270 of which are ancient ed in this way from father to son, and sworn to in Court. houses, and have a right of common over a large track Serjeant VAUGHAN then gave proof of his client of neighbouring grass-land. It was the object of the being descended from the sister of the grandfather of Plaintiff in this action to prove that a stint of six the person last in possession. cows, six horses, four kit caves, and three yearling The Judge, in his charge to the Jury, clearly lean colts, was the limitation, beyond which those who ed t.) the side of the Plainti ff , giving it as his opinion rented large farms had no more right to stock the com that his descent was clearly made out ; but that on. mon than householders of any other description. The pre- Defendant has usually put on more than this stinted the face of the other descent was much doubt and sumption : that the nearest in descent from the com- allowance of stock; and he defended his so doing on mon stock would certainly have the preference, but the ground of right to the common arising from le- vancythat good proof ought to be given of a real descent, and couchancy, and of his extensive f a rm giv- which proof he could not discern in the defendant's ing him a claun to pasturage superior to that of the case. smaller householders. The case involved some intri- Serjeant VAUGHAN here interposed, to refer his cafe questions of law. At the close of an i n q u i r y o f five hours, two old parchment deeds we r e introduced Lordship again to the will of Briggs ; but he would which sheered, to the satisfaction of the Judge, that not hear him. the custom of the stint had been established in t The Jury, after consulting a short time, requested consequence of an agreement entered into by the to retire ; but afterwards returned to Court to put this common-right holders, which could not be binding question to the Judge—Whether evidence from term :on their posterity ; and it was proved that the farmers tation was admissible, where a register could not be had for many years enjoyed an undisturbed privilege procured? The Judge asking to how far back the of turning to on the common over and above the stinted question related, and the foreman replying to a mar proportion. It was observed that the origin of these' rage which wok place a hundred years back ;he re common rights was this : The common was the pri- plied " yes, certainly." The Jury then requested to vote property of the Lo r d of th e M anor , w h o rante d see the will of Nicholas Briggs, which identified the 'the land to his tenants to feed their horsefrand.cows two sisters; and, after having retired again for a short sod thinboy . wesooquired, in return for ibis privi. time, returae4 with a verdict for the defendant. . Thy the 14th Nw at her fatlaer's house, ilertforlstree the I.afly 41floioatemont-Colouel.biorris, of she 73d Regiment, a son. • _ Monday, at Poihstona, Jaime CoNaimoli, Esq. only son Patrick Co:qtthoun, F.aq. I.L.D. to Katharine Deacon, yo gurt , daughter of James D. aeon, Esq. of hates -street, West:Waiter. Thursday, at Link Chart, Captain George Cooper, of th Bengal Establishment. to Jane, accoud daughter of the late 111 t, Lewis Munn, of that place At &hum, '!'pumas Monett, Esq. W. S. 1 7,1 Inburgh, to Mw Jane Bell Murray. daughter of the late Rev. Mr. Murray, Mk ulster of Channellt irk. IIIl), Sunday last, Mrs. Jennings - , many years a most reyectat.le in. habitant at Caine, Kilt.. On the 4th inst. at Cupar of Angus, on hi• way from Ritcaim„, to Aberdeen, Dripidier-Grneral Henry David Fra-tr, 4th the late William Fraser, E..q. of Fraserfteld. . On the sib iubt. at fixbriCgo, In her 30th year, Mn,, faul ts the wife of Mr. James, ,urge4o. s. On the 41h inst. at his apartments in the I.ambe h Samuel Collings, Esq. Sunday last, at Leeds, Yorkshire, Robert Davison, M.D. maw years Senior Physician to the General lE fi rmary of that town, Sus rises, Sun set. , Me a n rises, 45 minutes after 4 15 minutes after l er 7 22 minmes i'lei $ HIUH WATER AT LONDON BR ID3E Mornlag ...... 44 minutes after 3 Afteru•vm 0 yOnsters a r 4 DR. FREEM.%N'S GU 1 - 1 - A SA 1.0 I Atli value of this Infallible Medicine ihis been so long proved, that nothing of the present day can bear $ oompetition with it in all the different stages of a certain Disease, which it effectually cures and eradicates from the habit, w;iliosd etch ing the painful feelinrs and exposure that attends sahraton, without debilitating the constitution In any dezree, or even r ;qu i. ring confinement from late.iness, or restriction in diet. 'lle radical virtues of these inestimabl! Drops have proved their claim to publis approbation for more than SO years. In all the debility of hod sexes, they prove a never tailiug restorative, whether the debility isproduced by too free use of mercury, illicit pleasutes, or timed fe cts of a warm climate to travellers, and those going ,h o T bey cannot be recommended too strongly to those who will re ceive a safe. speedy, and complete cure in all old stubhurn Carets, andevery weakness that affects the bladdLr3Vid organs of urine. By its efficacy many women have become mothers who for years had been deprived of that happiness. Sold wholesale and retail at Mr. Butler's, No. 4, Cheapsi , le,cor. ner of Paternoster-row ; Baxter and Smith, Edinburgh and Glas gow ; Bolatn, Portsmouth; Newbury and Son, Dublin ; Pack and Turner, Hull; Howland and Haydon, Plymouth; aad by most Books; tiers and Medielue Venders in every Town, in boxes at 2.5.91. and 1 1 s. each, FOR FE.VERS, INFLUENZAS, MEASLES; kc. DR. JAMES'S POWDER. --- T HIS Medicine, after an unparalleled success for near seventy years, has g ained a proud pre- e min ence over every other Febrifuge. An Imitation, called the Antimonial Powder, was adopted in the Pharmacopoeia of the College of Physicians in 1785; and in 1781 a mutt elaborate Analysis of the two Medicines was published in the Philosophical I ran,- actions; front which it was coofidently assenei,, that they were the same In a sutsequent Edition, however, the College fairly and frankly confessed, that this Powder " was lavisher so mild, nor so czrtain to its operation as Dr. James's, anti that It could not be administered with safety in similar doses." —Thus ended their identity. But the Antimossial Puider l now altered la the 'blew Pharmaeapalai not pretending indeed to be Dr. James's ; but " snore nearly assimilating to it in doses.* lite truth is, however, that this Preparation is as remote as the former from the real Fever Powder ; and when Health and Life are at stake, no one surely will sacrifice, to the equivocal tut:tits . cf any Substitute, the long approved efficacy, safety and certainty o(tbe Original Medicine. _ It is sold only by F. Newbery and Sons, at their Warehouses, No. 4.5, St. Paul's Church-yard, Loudon ; or N 0.19, Dame -street, Dublin; as also at Dr. James's late house in Bruton-street, price 4s. 9d. a Packet; or a dozen in a Pottle (as made up for the Army and Nary) for 445. But none .re genuine vales* the weeds 4 ° 6. Nowbery, 'elm 4S, St. Paola," are engraved in the Sumps. .most infamous action ; and was proceeding to recom- mend a verdict for the defendant, when the plaintiff's ,Counsel, said he would be nonsuited. CROWN SWE. Thong limbos, a chimney-meeper, was indicted or breaking and entering the dwelling-house of John Leve, a labouring man, m the daytime, no person be- tOt,thpivin, and stealing various articles of wearing rel. 4 appeared that John Lowe was absent from the wait Part of sbe4lay the robbery w* .; • LINCOLN ASSIZES. Ih-se Assizes ended last week. The following were the principal causes: FYDELL V. WEDGE. . Upon the fate of this trial many others depended, and a question was involved very interesting to the inhabitants- of Boston, and of other Parishes conti guous to the East and West Fens. Long previous to the inclosure of these fens, grants, it seems, were given to the persons who came from distant parts, and who built houses and resided upon the spot, of the free use of the fens for feeding cattle to any amount. These fens contain 25,400 acres, and a right of common was granted in order to encourage the settlement of families and increase the popula tion. It has been presumed that every ancient hoint possessed this right ; and that it was also enjoyed by the toftsteads or scites of old houses that have I been pulled down, whenever new houses were erect ed upon those scites ; and the right was sanctioned by the Act of P. 'liament which passed for dividing the East and West Fens. The present action was brought to establish the right of two such houses in a commonage, and also the right of four toftsteads. The antiquity of the houses, and the character of the toftsteads, were recognized ; but it was objected, that it was not enough that they were of this descrip tion ; it must also be proved, that they actually have possessed and have exercised the right claimed. The Judge inclined to this opinion, and quoted the case of the Somersetshire fens, which appeared to him similar, and to be the only case in point within his recollection. He confessed, that, in this opinion, he had been opposed by Lord Kenyon, who, being a Somersetshire man, had carried his point against all the rest, but not without an Act of Parliament. Serjeant VAUGHAN replied, that if he must esta blish the fact of usage, he should be obliged to bring forward an ass for his evidence k and lie be lieved that his ass with long ears would be as good !evidence as the asses his Learned Friend could pro duce to oppose him ; and he declared that he should ',not be afraid of getting upon his Neddy, and tra. yelling across this immense fen of 26,000 actes. He then produced a declaration, which was admitted to be evidence, that a fisherman living in one of these lhouses kept an ass, which he always turned out upon the common to feed, and that he paid a person half-a guinea a year for looking after him, and bringing him up for him to carry his fish to market on. The large sum of half-a-guinea seemed to Mr. Clarke to be the purchase-fee of an unjust encroachment, he takingthe Serjeant's evidence not to be worth more than half-a crown. Witnesses were brought forward to prove, that many ancient houses actually exercised this right claimed, and that all ancient houses had the reputa tion of enjoying the right—none were ever known to be interrupted in the enjoyment of it—many exercised the privilege.who had small houses in dr: neighbour. hood without any land ; and many who have built houses upon the toftsteads have also enjoyed the right, they who have inhabited even a very small house have turned ant any number of cattle they pleased. A verdict was given for the Defendant ; and, ac cording to the opinion of the Court, they only who have exercised the right of turning out cattle, are to enjoy it—the right is lost by being suffered to be dor mant. A CARD TO THE FEMALE SEX. DR. FOTHEItGILL's ted Female PILLS, for different complain.s incident to the Sex, at vs rious periods of life. It has been truly &served, that worms, more than the other sex, may be aonsidered in a certain degree s. [tirade ; they are eubjected to it varietyof diseases, from the me tune of the functions they are destined, as mothers, to perform, which entels upsn them weakness, pain, and an interruption d those regular secretions connected with the full enjoyment of he:lth. To act on the constitution of the female and reLeve tins obstruction, no remedy has been known to operate with such ter taitity, quickness, and safety, as Dr. Fothergill's Female Pills—it ' unites Ugh tonic and invigorating powers, with its peculiar qua. lity of relieving fullness, oppression, and these other uneasy syrup. toms which ariselnam coo much blood in the kabit ; they are the most certain cure for nervous, hysteric, and flatulent complaints, as well as the various other spasmodic affections so common to the sex. Dr. Fothergill's Pills, as a famUy medicine, should be in possession of every mother and other guarikans of the young, who have females entrLsted to their care. Sold wholesale and retail at Mr. Buthes, 4, Cheapside, corner of Paternoster-row; Baxter and Co. and Smith. Edinburgh and Glasgow; .likilant, Portsmouth ; Newberry and Son, Dublin; Pack an/ turner, Hull; Hoiland and Haydon, Plymouth; and most Booksellers in every town, itt bases. at Vs. 9d. and 1 Is. Abe BUTLER'S AROMATIC PECTORAL. LOZENGES, for tmprovirg the voice, and for coughs, colds, asthmas, and cos suniptions. In boxes, at I 3 id. each. t- TO THOMAS TAYLOR, E n . f CONSIDER it but an act of justice due to the A merits of your I.EAKL's PATENT' PILLS, to ceinatunicam to you the bliosving Cure, which has recently bow pirformed by them. An acquaintance of mine,who by the betaking out dui old Venereal• Complaint (attestled by a complication of disorders arisi.-• therefrom) was reduced almOst to isludeton and ahho he hadthe best medical advice which could be obtained, and tried a variety of patent medicines, nothing could he procured which seemed to suit his case, or do him any service ; be remained ins most reduced and pitiable situation for two years, unable to fol low his profetlian, and scarcely able to walk or even to stand en his legs ; in face, no one who knew him ever supposed it possible fur him to recover. He was advised at last to try your Leads Pills—he did so, adhering strictly to the directions given with them—he had not taken more than two boxes, before be fossil an alteration for the better—this encouraged him to preened and by taking a few boxes more he found his appetite and strength gradually return, and is now as healthy and stout as any nwa, know. You are welcome, Sir, to refer any person to nee far • confirmation of the above account, if it should be Zoolned. I 4 11 Sir, your obedient bumble servant, THOMAS YURDAY. Library, Foikstone, July 10,1804. Prepared a::d sold by the sole Proprietor, Thomas Taylcr. Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, London, at his 114.rws, N 0.9, New Bridge-stptet ; where, after a constaat re:O.:nee of mote than 40 years, in a practice particularly d:rect4 to the cure of Venereal complaints and those inci:lental to the puts of goer , ation in both s..xes, with that inviolable secrecy which men orbit profession should always observe, he Ratters himself the *lei,* and assistance, he gra uhously administ.rs to per.ous taking dth medicine, win be esteem. 4 by a disc:.rning public as as a.:vantaie seldom to betabtained, a'.d void of ambiguity. Also sold by his appointment, for the converietre of the‘e ing at a distance, at the Perfumer's, No. 35, `t. Albeit rite •.t. Pall al I; t e Toy Shop, No. 10:1, Oxford-lyre et ; Mr. I.)e , be rough's, No. 7, Fish-street Hill; Mr. Baxter',., South eri. r e, Edinburgh ; Mr. htPDonald's, Glasgow ; Mr. Co'lwall's, Pi.b In; Mr. Bilituges, Liverpool; Mr. Atkinson's, Matic'icster ; and bf one person in every eonsi.!erable town in Great Brit•in old Ire' land, in boxes of only 2s. 94. each, seale.i up, with 11l a iirleab directions, whereby persons of eiils:r sex may cure ils N. B. Every box sold in Grezt Britain is sealed up, pity Stamp, on which, by favour of the Commissioners, s at the Stamp Office, " T. Tavlor, No. 9, New lirltige•straet,' to mitate which is felony, and ~l 1 others are counterfeit. LONDON: Printi-d and published lay LEVEL Kif.Nl' a. t' c &nut-Orrice, No. 1, cam-stmt., awl at thckfizAkOrlist • Tsimple-Bar. • r, J. r. le 1 e 0 'll UI n, u. al lira ti 1 7 ti• ts, 3y ad K. u. ck Ly xla Dr er