Star. — London, England, 1817-07-15 00:00:00

SPOI:7 IVG. Or elm.; ON TI:E MINCASTr.R ,I.l.EGlii2 s I.r 14. 5! tot apt Ale. Watt's c. by Whitelock. t Sir T. Staril-0. li ire 1. (1 I av,-t I) Ow nt 2tq 1 .•T on's S!a'ssborough. ' 0.. ; tig-t itir. Pletcher'. -t to 1 J„....! Sr. Catter•on's saber Robin. . 4 to 1 Isz.l Air. War's ch. c. by Ccrl): EW:11:112:;.E. r 5 t . ) 1 .i.rt Mr. pApie's Asor, brother til rsr;,••, rut v.:- NI Al WOR ?AO' , 01:1 SCA enr. ;.-6trvcii; dav'• talk s• varier para ehdtt o'clock oil Sunda; tazitt ~.•• tit -zo miles. lie started agYnyt-rerlay tarn - ring -•rir.t. • beton• hve, ant! f -or in d,.• afternoon had . ,at k v.z. so Hie ev:u3l, 27!) nal,. and I LOC, bud:ward.. .],y. Ilar: is, a atockaiz of Carli-le, for 117 Is 3. ru 103. nd. undertook r.. Long•OWfl 7. 4 Ali i!. in three boor, ; however,!uht lits two and a hall. Ihe wand maid, Lord'i Croton!, between the r • . .I".tisitt that wa• tLettled oa 1 riday iu 111.• Grand Cricket 1-latch a t I.nra'qaGrreisi , l, between eleven edocated at l.t.as, agaa:.,t eleven Geod.:men 01 ling' W 43 decidel on Satarday in favour of laiglantl. 1.411' INTELLIGLATE. CCURT 01' CHANCFRY, JULY 11. CA . W. TO PRO I'ESIANT t. AND S'fti••V.Uß' V I'KAItsoN AND orileu.s. Tnis else, which excited considerable interest from iin;oetance to the Dissenting Clergy, came on y betree tte• Lotto Cuareortranft at Lincoln's rut Hail. It was iii!ormat:on filed by his Ma. city's Attorney-General, at the instance of Ben nutoder and the Rev. John Stewart, against l'earson and other., trustees of a Dissenting Chapel, vr ; t eing ti! Cow t to grant an injunction to restrain D .fend vile from proceeding at law by an eject- It .4e:reared that in 1701 a piece of ground ta.t 1-o.'f.`ll lett by an individual for the purpose of a Ceapel being boil! " for the worship of Goo," and etas an acre of 1 end (c•alleit the Ten-fields) with other property, for the endowment of that Chapel. Toe question now before his Lordship was, whether n (:iapef which had been originally endowed for one purpose, could be empl eyed to another end than what was originally intended, or, in other words, whether Unitarians had a right to occepy a Chapel which originally WAN intended for Trinitarians? Sir S. Rostiti.v, Messrs. Haiti., SIIADWELI, and Cr .% w er e C woad for the Plaintiffs. They con tended, that in the well-known case of the Attorney- General t. Fourier, his Lordship had, after a patient inves:kation of facts, held, that an institution of the same nature as the one now under discussion, was to be considered and acted on the same as any other public charity, and therefore there could be no pus sible deuht on that head. T:fe point. therefore, now to be agitated WAS, whether the Court should permit t!:.! ;sei SOPS invested with such a trust. to act in a manner as would infallibly destroy it? This place of worship was now occupied by Unitarians, and the ouestion was, whether or not this had been the origi nal des;gn of the founder? It could not be his de sign, becluie a: t e time he feurided it, Unitarianism was and na public place of worship on that system could exist. It was still ill% ii, because the recent Act only removed the pana:ties attached to the profession of that opinion, but did no more.—. Mr. !•7.ewart h.id, it_ seemed, changed his opinions s.hd become a Triiii:arian ; and surely this was so well ; considering that he thereby became more orionant to the spirit of the founder. While the act of the founder gave the trustees a power to elect the Cergyman, it was his Lordship's duty to determine whather it was ever intended that by such a power beiti o .o conferred on them, they thereby became en titled to any capricious power over any person ap-1 pointed to the living, for it had ever been the policy that Court to prevent the holder of any living, whether Schools or Churches, (nun being dependent on the )ropk, as it evidently followed, that unless a Cl:repo - 4n was so situated, he became the tool of his fl ick, and must in fact conform to whatever system of truths they chose to prescribe to The Trustees had chosen to engage this individual for three years only. Now was this within their powers ? The trust deed declared the ;ncumbent should be for life, or at least while the said incum bent discharged his duties faithfully, and conducted himself as a moral character ; that he bad been at tentive to his duties, and was also a most respectable individuil as to morals was not denied, but yet they say, that As he was only engaged for three years, and as that time had expired, be ought to resign...r. Allowing this for a moment, why bad the other side permitted him to preach three months longer than his engagement ? lot they thus acknowledged, that in engaging him for three years, they had done what they had no legal power to do, as it was clear the founder had looked to the incumbent having perma nent possession, or he never would have founded the living. Mr. SHADWF.LL particularly argued, that it was impossible for a moment to suppose the Chapel had heen intended for Unitarians, whose principles, us Lord Raymond had justly observec', struck at the very vitals of Christianity, and who, as he ap prehended, had no legal authority to propagate their doctrines.—[The Learned Gent.eman here took a most luminous review of the doctrines of Christianity established at the Reformation, and sanctioned after wards by many Acts of Parliamentj.—Besides, though the Plaintiff had been elected for three years, he had nevertheless, by acting three months longer, become the Clergyman de facto of that Church. The LORD CIIANCELLOIL.... How many Defendants ore there here, as I observe you should have twelve Trustees ? T•le Sotacitron.Gewen,it.—My Lord. there are only sir, and Mr. Maunder makes seven altogether. The Lotto CIIANCELLOR.-1 apprehend the first thing this Court does is to take care that the legal estate be filled up ; and I remember a decision of the Mous? of Lords from Scotland, where their Lord. ships declared, that a Chapel built expressly for one purpose could not be converted to another. M:. SHADWIZI.L.—Then, my Lord, I need say no Mort; ii,is dacides my case in my favour. Toe SOLICITOR-GENERAL (who for the first time addressej Lois Court) said, he was instructed to op pose the motion for an Injunction, while at the same he was aware there had been too much irrele vara matter introduced on this • occasion. He was clearly of opinion that the superintendence of this Chapel was vested in the majerity of Trustees, and his clients, therefore, constituting the m2l3rrty,- had just done as they had a right to J. and he contend ed that the Court could not deprave them of their trust, unless it was proven they were guilty of violat ing that trust. tie lamented that the trust deed had been drawn up in so general terms, and expressed %ineerc wish that it had particularised the doc trines which were to he taught in the Chapti, but he could hot _ce why thee doctrines dinold row/ be the subject of discussion before the Court. The conduct of Nlaturiers sttem:tel to him somewhat singular, and he must nay that it was extremely unaccount able why that individual, who was appointed a Tr usteeoin 17:32, and had kilw.un that Unitarian doctrines were inculcated lit the Chapel, shoald now kr the first tins: come forward in to declare his aversion to tliet,.! doctrines. As he unquestionably kace: these. doctrines were taught, why had he not sooner coon manfully forward to avow his dissent from them, an! his conviction that they were contrary to-what the lounger designed: Much had been said by his Learned Friend, Mr. litiadvrell, respecting the dan ger aii,ing irons such doctrines, but he thought the /glut patandi of such a charge lay on the pl sintilfs, who were sorely bound to make gond their cause.— He contended that there was no yne,.icn at all bzlote the Court respecting the nature tit the doctrines, and all that was insisted for was, that the Defendants had a right to do as they had done in virtue of the mutt deed. The Lotto CoANcLuon.-1 want to know, Mr. S•dicitor 7 General, does this famous deed say one word about the election of the Minister or Clergy man ? The Sock:iron GEseitai.• —1 believe not, mr Lord• Leo CIIANCELLOR.—AiI ! that, however, is very important to the question, for allow me to say, that nothing can be more important than this. We in this Court hav'e had many c..ses about popular coils to livings, and also about Trustees ; but I have alv►ays thought and held, as Ido in this case, that where the constitution of a trust is darkly expressed, you can only learn it from what has been the uniform usage in electing persons as Clergymen or Trustees under that trust. It is not from the practice of a day, but from uniform usage you can learn thus. Mr. BENVON and Mr. Pion.List.na, on the same side, contended, that though Sir Samuel Rot:rids and the other Counsel had argued th•rt the living was to be held 6 , iamdiu sc brae geiscrit," still it was obvious that the agreement was binding on all parties, and that by the char ter Mr. Maunder could not act as a Trustee, having vacated his trust by lung absence. It was .mportant this question should be settled, to prevent further contests. The LORD CDANCELLOR.-4 never heard it before said in this Court, that the contests of parties in a cause of this kind wawa cause why expedition should be used in giving a decision. Sir SAstura.ltostrux made a moat ingenious reply, And at considerable length entered into the merits of tire case. He contended, no benefit could result to the congregation from the ejedtment ; that the charges again►t Mr. Maunder were unfounded, he having never left Wolverhampton ; and that in a question of this kind it was morally impossible the doctrines of the party should not be discussed. He was clearly of opinion, that if a sum of money was left for the purpose of propagating Unitarian doctrines, this Court would not sanction it; though at tire same time he was prQud•to witness that liberality of senti- , ment which at present pervaded the country, and by which the Jew and Chri►tian were equally protected in worshipping the De!T•tr according to the dictates of conscience, " none daring to make them afraid." This was just as it should be, and would, he trusted, for ever be the case in this country—as he I►ad yet to learn why men should be prohibited from offering that homage to the DEM which •an enlightened heart and understanding dictated. But in the ease he had put, he was sure no Court would ever sanc tion such a grant. He lett his cause in his Lord ship's hands with lull confidence of its meeting that impartial attention and just decision which his Lord ship always gave to every case. The Loan CHANCILLOR—This case involved so many points of importance to the Dissenting interest and to the public, independent of its importance to the parties, that ire should not feel himself justified in deciding it at present. He understood the law of William 111. as respected the Unitarians, and the Scottish laws also, had been repealed. It he was nut mistaken, death was the punishment attached to the violation of these laws. Sir S. Rourf.t.v—Yes, my Lord, for in the time of King William one man was tried and executed. LOUD CHANCELLOR—He was glad they were re pealed, and that a bill also had passed fcr the same purpose, relative to Ireland, last week. He deeply lamented religious disputes, as they had always been found to be the most inveterate, and the most difficult of being reconciled. After stating a few general observations on the law of the case, his Lord. ship said he should certainly take home the Bill and Answer, and read them over carefully. If deeds were drawn too loosely, and in too general terms, he could only say that the blame solely attached to these who drew them. Ou Thursday he should give his judgment in this case, which was one of the deepest importance. • COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, HILT 14. BELL V. DONAVAN. This an, action brought against the defendant, owner and master of the brig Crocus, to recover the money paid for a passage to Gibraltar, and compen sation in damages for the injury sustained by the plaintiff in consequence of the defendant's sailing away without due notice, and leaving the plaintiff behind. It appeared in the course of the examine. tions, that the vessel was detained in the Downs by contrary winds, from the 26th December to the 9th January; that the passengers in consequence were . suffered to go on shore and live at their own expense, the Captain undertaking to hoist a signal whenever there should be a favourable change in the weather. If he sailed at night, the appointed signal was to be two lanterns in the shrowds. It appeared that there had been some previous" disagreement between him and his passengers ; and that he bad been heard to speak disrespectfully of them, as a d—d queer set, they having refused to accommodate him with re gard to the dinner hour. The wind changed on the evening of the sth of January, and the Captain pro ceeded to get under weigh abbut eight o'clock ; he hoisted the lights at twelve, but they were not per ceived by the man whO watched for the passengers till !rapast one, when the peteeneere were Collected,' and induced to take a boat to proceed on board. The vessel did not, however, bring-in, although the boat followed it fr< m the coast of Deal te that of Dover. A gq4A deal of contradictory evidence was given wish regard to the notice, and the means taken to apprize the passengers -1 the vessel's departure ; but the Jury found ea verdict for the plaintiff, who had been obliged to wait three weeks tertore he could procure a passage in another vessel.—Damages 470. COURT OF COMMON 1):.9.,5i, DUBLIN, JULY 9. CON.-111tOWNE V. BLAKE. Mr. Hoi.weu. WAeses °prated the pleadines. He said that the plaintiff in this case ..vas Mark Browne,, Esq. and the defendant Martin Jos ph Blake, Esq. This action was for criminal conversation with the' plaintiff's wr‘..e, and the damagee were laid at ie,to.ooo Mr. Pone tes sf ited t'ee pl iintifl'e case. He la mented the corruption of morals in the present age, the pestiferons contagion of which had even infected in an alarming degree thebeAsted purity and chastity of Irishwomen. He called upon the Jury to express their execration of the crime of the adulterer, and arrest his progress by their verdict ; ohservine, LI) t ii vice enough had crept in -amongst us to cowrie this Abominable crime, he was certain there was virtue sufficient in this country to brand it with infamy, aild justice enough to visit it with exemplary purishment. A. Browne, Eeq. knows the plaintiff, Mr. M'rk Browne; he is a young man of :thou: fle years of ages entered into the marriage state with Miss Blake in the year 1811. She is a .young Lady of about three and twenty years of age at present. ‘Vit ness was present at the marriage, which was solemnized by the Roman Catholic Ilielifip of 'Nam'. Mr. and Mrs. Browne were both of that religion. Mr. Browne, at the time of his marriage, possesse-1 a fortune o' se`2,ooo a.year, and is of must respectable family and connections. Mrs. Browne was uncommonly hand some. Witisess, since their marriage, had been mo intimate in their family, and of course had full and frequent opportunity of seeing their manner of lacing at their seat, Rocktield, in the county of Galway : they appeared remarkably find and attached to each other; never saw a couple more affectionate and happy. Mrs. Browne was a clever woman, and had the management of all the money matters. Mr. Browne was very much attached to the pleasures of the turf ; and two or three years after his marriage, being rather unfortunate in his bets., hurt his fortune materially : his affairs, in consequence, became very much embarrassed, and on one occasion he was obliged to conceal himself for some time, at his house in the County of Galway. Mrs. Browne bad then the sole management of his busi ness, and acquitted herself with ability and credit.— The husband kept at this time wholly at home, and his why transacted all his business abroad, and atten ded the meeting that season at the Curregh. Mr, Browne kept a plentiful and hospitable table, accord ing to the custom of his country ; there were occa sionally several visitors there; Mr. Blake, the present defendant, was a 'favourite and constant visitor there during the last year, 1816, and beginning of the pie sent ; the whole family were very attentive to, and fond of him. Mr. 13:0 wife never expressed to witness any suspicions of Mrs. Browne being attached to Mr. Blake ; nor did he (the witness) ever sec any ins:mire of particular mien:ion from Mr. Blake to Mrs. Browne but once; particular business brought Mrs. BroWne up to Detslin ; he (the witness), Mr. Blake, and ano ther friend, were also in town at the time. Mr. Browne was to come up and jnin her immediately. she put up at l.ennon's Hotel, in Sackville-street; the persons before-named supped, and sit together until eleven o'clock, when he (witness), and the other Gentleman (Mr. Robert Power), arose to go away ; they expected Mr. 13141te would here dome away will them ; they ateed him to do so, but lie paid no atten tion to what they said, and they went away without him. Witness conversed with his companion on the ' suspicious appearance of this circumstance, and ex pressed his intention of communicating it to the lius band when he should arrive; but atter they had talked it over, they thought it would be better not to let the husband know any thing of the matter, p.trticularly as Mr. Blake said was shortly to go to France, for which purpose he had then come to Dublin. Mr. Blake had a sister and brother, who had been educa ted in a convent, and were visitors with hurt during the I.ttter part of 1816. and beginning of this year, 1 1 at Mr. Browne's residence. Cross-munind.—Mrs. Browne is young, cheerful, beautiful, lovely, and lively ; her husband is also young, and has no vices; except horse racing, a little gambling, sontztimes pretty deep drinking ; heard him of ten talk of his amours since his marriage; when he heard him talk so, considered it as boasting; this was over their' wine after his marriage ; he is, nevertheless, a goad man, and was an affectionate husband: never heard him talk so at his fire side, or in the presence of his wife ; never heard him boast of having carried on amours in his own house. Mrs. Browne, at the time her husband was obliged to con ceal himself, attended the Curragh Meeting in his stead. Mr. Browne is also fond of cock.fighting ; he has attended some matches of cock-fighting since his separation from his wife, and the commencement of the present action. .1. Rude has known Mark Browne for many years; remembers Mr. Browne and Captain Burke going together from Rocklield, for a day or two, to way ; they went on a Satin day. and welt; a. return on Monday. Remembers Mr. Blake came to Rock field before their return ; knows a place in the county of Galway called Ado nry, about two miles from the Plaintill's house ; saw Mrs. Browne go out to walk on foot there one of the days her husba n d was absent ; she remained out about two ho urs •l and a halt; it was on Sunday, in the month al January ; it was a very disagreeable day, rained heavily; she went out the next day. Monday the,27th, to take the same walk ; it wai not so bad a day as the former; witness was surprised she would go out in such unpleasant weather without a carriage.— Monday evening Mr. Browne returned home. Mrs. Browne employed the Saturday, January 25th, when he was gone, in writing and burning letters. Knows Roger Byrne, a servant of Mr. Browne's, saw Mrs. Browne give him a packet. Recollects the moron% ' of Tuesday the with of January ; m t Mrs. Browne on the top of the stairs of her own house ; she wa: then coming down stairs front the bed-chamber storey; it was they about half-past eight she was dresse, very lightly; sbe had on a short bed-gown, a loos• night-cap, and he thinks no p'etticoat. During al the tame h. iliac, Mr. and AT-". Browne, he tiliffer saw a more lovingo , r happy ci•ulsle. Crory-ex. , :r?incd.—Never he ird Mr. Br %vile boas: of his gallantrie‘.. pith. r before or after dinner. Said he.saw Mrs. Browae, i;ono :.fier he met tier undr.'ssed on the st tire, in the p irlatrr, •:nd Mr. lilak in lit undress talking to her ; bot t was a treed:it') iso way particular in that p tof tLa country. Mra. Browne told him when shaeartre b im her w-lk in Athenry, that she laid beet. to th:i liri , st. Mr. Cumming, the pain:er, was a favourite guest, at d oft :a walked and rode out with t! e lady. (4t.liq P. J. le. an Otlicer in army, tea at Mr. Browne's lii.ase cm Saturn! c 2i;.:1 of Ja nuary last; accompanied Mr. Brown that day to GaiWAT, and to ,k Oran Castle, the reuidt.n.:? of Mts. Bro Nee's 1.:02er, iu their way ; left b.l.ind thee:'. at Rocky:ell!, bliss Silly Blak.: and her yeainger bto • ther., Darcy, Mr. Cumming, and Mr. Hughe they dud not retina until Monday evening. Mr. firoxne appeated to la! an ertrcmely affectinnate htisband ; roc:Of-co: w h irr he shah at the 1111.1se tit,: he came into his !red..; t:sir;;,-r pretty late at night, ani coraidaiced to him. in distress, thst Mrs. Brower was very ill ; this was oa the night of the 2'i t!: of J.. unary. on their re urn from Galway. V:ituess saw Mrs. Browne on ch.: morning of the 24th r r J nary, going down stairs, very lightly dressed, in a shalt be.!. gown and her shift ; Mr. Browne was titer. in his own room, and witness lwating him call nut several time; went to him, and lound him much a.iatated. NVitnes; gave orders to remove the fire arms and other d-...attalc tive weapons out of the roi‘m, considering it flange. roils to leave them there. in con , eque!.ce of Mr. Biuwne's slat': of nund. Mrs. Browne was sent away the day after. Mr. Browne was very fond of his wife, and she of him ; the attachment appeared to be reciprocal ; Mrs. Browne was a thee, flit, gay, and lively woman, extremely handsome .end sweet tem. pored ; she bore four children to her husband, and was delivered of a filth (a boy) since their separation. P. Byrne, servant to Mr. Browne, remembers his mistress gibing him a letter, three weeks alter the 27th of September last, to emu to Mr. Blake; shy par ticul.iily desired him to give it to no person but Mr. Blake; witness did so, and got 'an answer; Mr. BI ike likewise told him to take care and give the an swer to no one but his mistress. Ilfary iJindr, servant to Mr. Browne, remembers Mr. Blake anJ several other persons being at the bons.: on the 2.7111 of January last ; her tilivress gave directions to her that night, and bade her have break "sr very early , for Blake was en hunt the r. , !xt morning ; Remember: that morning ; saw her 'pis tress in the lobby, in .1 •liort bed-own and her shift, just opposite to Mr. B 1: kc's hedo . uom, the door of which was ajar, mid Me. (Lake, in his shut, Loking out ; Leard s violcia • r robing of her masier's ; soon after saw Mr. Bro..sne in the parlour ; she writ[ to a writing civic, which was also a dressing-ca,e, and which wittie.e certain was not in the parlour the night before; that wi.ting-Jcsk has been remove.!, and WAS never sitii - e found. This witness was examined to another trarl. action. She swore etat in the monta of A.:gum, • hake and a party 111.nlie men wire. OA a visii at Mr. Brownt•'s. 'f ;try ail wen,. to 'tint, except Mr. H • :tai.! :it V. rit. - kti4L!, and wit:.••,s saw him g o up to 1::e be.!-louirr tio•-, and Mr , . Browne also ro up. When witness saw her all-,ttess she (die miser,.,,) was greatly flairied. it struck her (the wita•si) As being suspicious, but .lie did not coininumeate i, to any person. Same tame alter this affair, her rm , tiess Came in with wet feat, and desired the witness t.i pull off her (Mrs. Bioatile's) and put Cxin to dry at the parlon: the. When they had been taken till, she (1 ...fs. 0Alle) saw the de fendant coming towards the hou,e, ai,.l cried out, Oti, here i% Mr. Blake !" and ordered the witness to draw on the steck.ngs again, without waiting to have them dried. Mis. Browne that went to meet Mr. Blake, and wiawis saw" her through a glass door which led hoar a Ito: en 11,:use tri the grand hall, throw her arms round Mr. 14.ike's neck and kiss hilts. The reason that she concealed the a circumstances, she said, was, that she th-light it would be extremely wrong to go between man and wile. The cross.examination of this witness consumed two licurs and a hall. I ts object was to spew that she v.as favourite of :dr. Browne's (with whom she still lives), and to induce a belief that she had been cri. miadily intimate with Lim, :inch therefore not &sa ving of credit ; bur not the slightest imputation oa bet - veracity was thus obtained, The text wiinoss wus //opera llrcaan. She went to live AC Mr. Browste'!., a, seivaist, in May 181.5, and left it in nlay, 1811;. Akw rays before her depar tote site saw Mr. Eloise come up stints to his rn an And go into it. S!te sow N'rs. Dionne go int, it afterwards; witness tben duwn stairs, but re turned in about 1.5 or '2O whittles, and saw Mr. 1314 k: cibrie out of his 10,in ai.d go down stairs. Mrs. Blowne went to her own r..om, and witness did n.. 3 see her alto - Words that eight. betwe-n eleven mid twelvi! o'cli.cit at night. Mr,. Browne was skewed for flue night, except that she helki petticoats on. It was t t the parlour Mr. 111ake went. where the Gentle:men were drinicinfi:; witness Taltted the s..rvice lit a few Jays alter tlii. trunsuetion. returned back in vie it•llowitig October, for three weeks. During Cie sccond -toy :he went one dty into the otowing-roits isifh bird :lords,. which she had been cleaning. and Mr. and Mrz. Browne sitting at the lire, ;tin' Alr. Bloke kissing her inistress.-The lutltr 4 a,ke angrily and" intpudehtly" to witness on this occu I). Al. hi cvin, E.- 7 . in ove.cl the rrurringe stttlemvn!s of Mr. ;old Ai; ". b. 41tV He. The Lily . % tcrttole .C 5000; ion the uitocis never IteArki th.:: any pArt it 114 d been The defence occupied the r.thule of nest day. The eviket cc adduced went to (rove the the plaino7'.vas .nuch Addicted to the plea•.ures of the chAce and the table, and war• el carekss and ne t ;ligent tittsband• The Jury wonted a verdict for the dLtendAnt.-- Costs—Sixtence. SCOTLA NO—A ppoi t 01 , •tlt r . f•r the. t.i mn C;rett:t NOK I ll Lora Clr, k ....a.... Ka Perth, Wednesday, Sep.. 17 ; tV'erle.ll, Sc', fond y. Sept. SuuTu—Lore. I lei tuiuld Am! Ayr, Thuruuy, s i p,. il ; ,U.li:r.c , , St)l. 17; halt/mei, M• apt. 12. Wei r--14tral Yi•milly mid I.t.rd seiceeth. Stirlint, Faddy, Sept. I::: lvvcrary, %Vrthirktity, inn, :7 ; GIA-gow, 1 utp2day, .J.