Star. — London, England, 1822-12-23 00:00:00

T--..a., ~*' : r T , :tr To A HUSBAND. ; Oh I were I hi M dying hour, And Mon beside me mourning stood, Still WOlll.l I own sfection's pow'r, And searceiy welds a dearer good! Though Heaven were open to my eyes, And bliss supreme awaited me, Ny struggling soul would grieve to rise, Deeming earth heaven, while blest with Mee ! And, nh! if in the spheres above Stints have one spark of earthly feeling, Still would my thoughts be with thee, love; And froth celestial regions stealing ! For one short hour I'd earthward stray, To snatch thee from a world of care ; Point to mg home the 'gust way; Nor.call It heaven, till this wen there ! LAW INTELLIGENCE. COVIIT 07 CHANCERY, DECEMEER si. - - _ Some' ttiotions occurred of no public . importance: one of them having Been called on, in which Mr. 116ALIY was retained, Mr. Haar stated that he was at Chambers. The Lotto CtraNcEt.con said, gg Renumber, those motions which can be made to-day, and are not made, shall not be made on Monday." VIdE-CHANCttLOTS COURT; D'ItaMIRR Si. TILE ATTORNEY-GENERAL a HIS GRACE Tat DOKI Olt MARLBOROUGH. Mr. *RAY stated, that this was a petition Iry the part of his Grace the Duke of Marlborough, praying that it should be referred to the Matter to inquire to what extent the cutting down of timber. pursuant to the order of the Court, should be carried. The peti tion of his Grace stated, that he had caused what was termed the Little Park at Blenheim to be surveyed by two surveyors, and that it was their opinion that it Would contribute highly to the ornament of Blen heim, if the plan which they (the surveyors', had made were carried into effect. It was also prayed that the balance of the sale of the timber cut down upon the estate should be forthwith paid into the pe titioner's hand:3. Mr. It appeared on behalf of the plaintiff', the Marquis of Blanchard, and would not object to any ordpr which the Court thought proper to grant to the petitioner, as far as respected a reference to the Master. He wished, however, to explain to the Court tire' nattily of the proceedings which had been taken since the order for felling timber had been pronounced.— He did not mean to say that that order was not a most proper one at the time it was made, nor did he mean that it was improper even at this moment; but it was necessary to call the attention of the Court to , the steps which had been taken, in order that it might judge Whether its order had been abused. • The VICE-CHANCELLOR observed, that he could only send a. reference to the Master in the words of the order already pronounced by the Court. Mr. HeAt.b said that, according to the petition of his Grace the Duke of Marlborough, it seemed that the plan of these surveyors was to cut down an im mense avenue of fine grown trees, and convert them Into clumps. This would have the effect of convert ing. Blenheim, at present a noble park, into some thing like a box or villa, of which many were to be seen in the neighbour hood of London. He thought that if this plan were adopted, it would be going fur ther thafl the Court had Originally intended. He rarticularly objected to the latter part of the petition, elative to the balanceon the sale of the timber being paid into the hands of the petitioner. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said, he was now called upoii to ileteiene Aether the plan of improvement made by these surveyors ought to be adopted. This he had no power to do, and the Master only was the proper person to c'Onsider the subject. If the peti tioner was dissatisfied with the Master's conclusions, he Might then apply to this Court. With respect to the park of Blenheim; eve was only one way of *left Tt iYr Sts read character, and artery one would regret to tee it convened litto k mere 'county villa. He shoila direct that it be 'refeared to The Master to inquire (and these were the words of the order) whe ther it would he expedient, for the purpose of the . mproviirient f the 140-attire grounds, par and plan aucins of Blenheim, to adopt the Plant =lnbred ist the report, with any and what variations. COURT OF KING'S BENCE% IMClEttleitiu. Tilt KING V. ME 'RtV. itICITARD BINGHAM. This wasan indictment against a Clergyman, the perpetual ;Curate of Gosport, for perjury. The perjury Imputed to the defendant was as;• signed On the statements made by 111.011 in 'an affidavit. to ground 'motion for setting aside an annuity or: £450, granted by bins in 1815 to persons nansed:M . vington and Boston. Before this . period, Mr. Bing- . °barn, being in great embarrassment, employed hit, Attorney, Mr. Hugh Lewis, to obtain for him UNA: and he, conseqnetitly,'ap plied to Mr. Benjantiti.Lewis, of CrutChed4riars,to obtain the money of his - clients.. Mr. B. Lewis stated that he had succeeded in pre vailing on Messrs. Kilvington and Boston to advance the'mdney as the purchase of an annuity of fASOrper annum,. to•be secured on Mr..Bingliant's freehold estates, On the'payment of a mortgage then eneOM bering the premises, and the satisfaction of the judg- i went creditors. The 23d of December was fixed'firr, the execution of the deeds, and the final arrangement with all - parties, and the meeting was appointed .for that evening at the'house of Mr. Benjmnin It was on the transaction of this evening that the de fendant, having failed in defending an ejectment which was brought for the recovery of the estate .on' non-payment of the annuity, grounded his motion for setting aside the annuity, and on which. he was now indicted for perjury. It was admitted by the wit nesses for the prosecuti on , t h at b e f ore t h e execut i on of the deeds, it was agreed that themortgagres should be paid principal and interest ; that a sum sufficient to satisfy the judgment creditors should beleft in the . hands of Mr. Levi is, and that Mr. B. Lewis should receive three hundred guineas for his trouble in the ne ,, ociation, and for the expenses of the deeds; and it was further admitted that, in point of fact, the £3OOO was disposed of in the following way—£llB3 10s. paid to the mortgagees; £l5Ol. 10s. left in the hands of Mr. Lewis to satisfy the judgment creditors, and £315 given to Mr. Lewis for his own bill and charges. But Mr. Bingham, iu his affidavit, further .-~---.. 3,7 : 4 1 -1 11•' . 1 swore that he had never • had- dm, .•. or con trout of thepurchirse- money e, y, or any part of it; that Mr. Lewis. predated' a quantity of ' notes which were never counted, and. held' his hand on one part of them, while he was req' nestedle touch the other as matter of form; and that 74. Lewis, and not himself, paid Mr. Rouse, the mortgagee % the sum of £llB5. 10s. which he attended to receive. Upon this affidavit a rule was granted to sly ervhcame.why the annuity should not be set aSidel but the affidavit being positively contradicted by Mi.. Lewis and his clients, the Rule was afterwards discharged~ The statements in this affidavit, with respect .to the cere mony attendant on the settlement, were now charged to he wilful and corrupt falsehoods, it being alleged that the whole £3OOO was paid to Mr. Bingham, and placed in his manual possession ; that it was counted down, and that he himself made that disposition of the money, which in substance was not disputed. To prove the falsehood of Mr. Bingham's state ments, Mr. Prujean, the conveyat i cer who prepared the deeds; Mr. Esdaile, a, clerk of Mr. B. Lewis; Mr. Kilvington, one of the parties who advanced the £3OOO ; and Mr. B. Lewis, the Solicitor, were called,. who swore that the money was counted. out to Mr. Bingham, was paid into his hands, and was alter `wards distiibuted by him in the manner already stated. They admitted that, before they went into the room, the disposition of the money had been ar ranged, though the interest on the Mortgage remained 'to be calculated, and a blank was therefore left for: the amount iii the deeds. On cross-examination, Mr. B. Lewis admitted. that a letter produced had been 'addressed by him to the defendant, in which he ex pressed his readiness to compromise the prosecution ler £l5OO, but refused to take up, and declared that "he would never return the sword to the scabbard" on other terms; Mr. Bingham had, after the dispo sition of the money, begged fot £lOO, which Lewis, after some hesitation, gave him. • Mr. Soartuctr addressed the Jury for the defendant. he felt it due to him personally to state, that having. long known •him, he was convinced that he was ut terly incapable of the crime laid to his charge. He had been unfortunate—perhaps imprudent ; but when acquaintances were often unwilling to take a man by the hand, and coldly took to themselves the credit of having predicted his downfall, it became the duty of those who knew the integrity of his heart to come for ward and protect him against calumny and oppression. Embarrassed' as he had been, his worst enemy would never have suggested the possibility of his committing perjury, until he encountered the dangerous friend ship of Mr. Benjamin Lewis. In the course of his (Mr. Scarlett's) experience, he had seen enough of prosecutions of this kind to suspect that they were often instituted with the hope of obtaining money from the defendant, but never had he till to-day heard such a candid and unblushing avowal as that which had been made by Lewis. When he saw such a man attempting to use a prosecution of this kind as a Sword to be thrust into the vitals of another, he would interpose his humble shield to protect the intended victim. On all the material facts of the case, there was no doubt that 1f r. Bingham bad sworn truly; the very recitals in the deed proved that it was the inten doh of Lewis, that this unfortunate man should not - quit the room with a shilling of the money for which the annuity was granted. Phis might be right in it self: it was right to secure the judgment creditors, and right to take care that the mortgage was paid ; and it might possibly be right to secure 300 guineas for himself; but whether right or wrong, could any one doubt that, in point of fact, Mr. Bingham never had the controul of the £3000? If he hair not—if he would have been stopped had he attempted to leave the room with the money, it was really imma terial whether the notes were or were not counted into his hands. And if he ever had the controul of this money, would he have begged and implored, Lewis to give him a wretched pittance out of it to supply the necessities immediately pressing upon him ? It Was quite needless to offer evidence as to the' result of the prosecution; but still, as he must put in. Mr. Lewis's letter, he would not rest there, butwould call witnesses, who would These that there was not the slightest pretence for this cruel imputation on Mr. Bingham's honour. Mr. Hugh Lewis, who attended as at:tomer for Mr. Bingham at the exectstant of the deeds; was then sworn. He stated that, Wore going into the room, it was arranged that the balance of the purchase money of the annuity should remainitt Mr.B. Lewis's bends, to satisfy the judgment creditors. His im pression was, that -after interest had been calculated 'on the nrortgages a parcel of bank-notes was handed ar Mr. Lewis to Ihe defendant, who merely touched them, Mr. Lewis holding one end of the parcel, and that the mortgage money was paid to Mr. Rouse, not by Mr. •Bingham, but by Mr. Lewis. He could not, however, at this distance of time • , positively swear that Mr. Lewis laid not count out ;henotes, that Mr. Bingham did not personally satisfy the mort-- gagee, though the centrary was his impression. He. 'believed the judgment debts exceeded £1,500. The LORD CRIMP JUSTICE here interposed, and . said ihat, .on this evidence, he thought it would be impdssible for any Jury to convict of wilful-and cor rupt perjury. When it was-agreed that the disposi-. tion °film money was previously arranged, and that the only question was, whether more or less of care •mony took -place in the manner of paying it, and ss hen one witness, who had given his evidence with an impartiality and a caution highly creditable to himself, concurred in his impression with the state ment made .bythe defendant, he thought it .was too much to expect that any Jury would find that de fendant guilty. The SOCICITORAGINRRAL observed, that the de greetif , ceremony was very material to the question whether theammityshould or Should not be set aside. The Loan CHIEF .JUSTICE replied, that he had not said otherwise. All he meant was, that when one.tespectable witness agreed with the defendant in his account of a transaction dependent on cere mony, •it was a .fair • inference that the defendant. Might honestly entertain the same opinion. 1 . The SOLICITOR-GENRUAL said, that alter such an intimation, he could not, in a criminal case, think of proceeding further. His only desire that the cask might proceed arose from his wish to repel the attack which had been made on Mr. Benjamin Lewis, who.; he was confident, might he shewn to -have acted,. throughout the transaction, with • the strictest pro priety and honour. • The LOAD Cllll./ JUaTICE said, in this case no ....-ter: -.,.. r . n le ones conduct was in qiiest . ion; i labt4l4 ll . f ill ec e) rro• L and 14. thb..BlPritk fendaot-on the rocerw o uld' proubd to Jotter= 'him on that 01;00, tlley dict of acquittal. LA CON V. 114GOINE, OT OE h. This was an action by the irsbandof Mrs. tAtiSfl; ,NBl *rh• The Jury found the..Clefendatit. nt betweettlthich, 1819, and December , 1820. The d e lo to tb r e ecz fe e a r a 1 a Mod. that at the time of m akin g the . a fo C r o d t r i e rt sse d wife prom ises th the deck sresifin;intisalikeedr r ation, she was the w of Henry • Higgins, which f &Fa which WAS denied in the replication by the plaintiff. • Mr. SCAOLETT was ahriut to state the case, when The Souiatoa-Gesertat. insisted on his right to begin, as the affirmative of the issue lay on defendant. Mr. SCA R LETT said he must still provethe amount of the bill. The Soract•ron-Germani replied that he would admit the amount of the bill, having no witnesses to contradict its items. He theft proceeded to open the evidence, by which he intended to suppert the plea of coverture. The defendant, a most respectable Lady, the widow of Mr. Isaacs, an Officer in an African Regiment, went in 1817 to reside at Paris. There she became acquainted with Mr. Henry Hig gins, and was married to him by a Clergyman of tile Church of England, named Sullivan, at Versailles. At this marriage Mr. Higgins Everard and the wait ing-maid of the Lady were present; but, unfor tunately, Mr. Sullivan was dead, and Madame Si mond, the femme de chambre, had gone to Greece; so that he could only call Mr. Higgins Everard• to prove an actual mar, iage. He would shew, how ever, by a sister of the defendant, that the parties left Paris for the purposes of marriage; that they re turned as husband and wife; and that they had since been received in the most respectable circles as such. To prove this case, Miss Donovan, the sister of the defendant, was first called, who appeared in a state of great weakness and agitation, and was allowed a chair. *Mr. GUrney repotted her answers, which were given in a very low tone of voice. She stated that her sister left Paris for Versailles to be married, and returned as the wife of Mr. Higgins. Mr. Higgins Everard swore to the actual mar riage, which was performed by a Protestant Clergy- Man, though the parties were Catholics. This wit ness, who came up from Whitecross-street prison, ad mitted that he bad written letters to the plaintiff's at , . torney. offering to withdraw from the country, so as to avoid appearing as a witness, in consideration of fifty pounds. Lord Clanmorris, Sir W. S. Lilly, and Captain Whiting, were called, who proved that they had met the defendant and Mr. Higgins, who was al Attorney at Dublin, as Mr. and Mrs. Higgins, in tae most re spectable society of both sexes. Mr. Alderman Wood was called, but did not ap pear. He had been in Court in the early part of the day, but had quitted it to preside over the meeting of his Ward. Mr. ScarthErT-addressed the Jury on the evidence, and contended that there was no credible proof of an actual marriage. Was it credible that these parties should go to Versailles, when they might have been married in the Chapel of the Ambassador, without the trouble and delay of the journey ? Was it ere= dible that, being Catholics, they would contract mar tine in a form which could not bind their con sciences ? Where were the witnesses of the cere mony? Madame Simond was 'gone to Greece, and Mr. Sullivan was gone—to Heaven ; and the Lady had taken away the certificate in her pocket, as the only party interested in keeping it. lie contended that Mr. Everard was utterly unworthy of credit ; he said that he should he able to prove that the de -Pendant had obtained her pension by the name of Isaacs, and that she was introduced to Mr. Lacer as a dashing widow with a large jointure. Besides this, he should contend that the mart iage, supposing it to have been performed, was invalid by the law of France; for he could chew that by that law no mar riage was good, unless contracted before the Mayor of the district where the parties had resided for six weeks—unless contracted in the presence of four male witnesses—and unless authenticated by the certificate of the Magistrate. There was an exception as to mar riages performed In the Ambassador's Chapel, and; under his sanction. To prove this to be the French law, the French , Vice-Consul was called, who produced a book pro- ; fessing to be a digest of French law, and published' by the authority of Government, which contained . the law as stated by Mr. Scarlett. The witness said that this book, if produced in any Court in France, would be acted upon as law: that there were no ori ginal records; but that the corrected copies of the laws, published by authority, were the only docu assents to which reference could be made. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL objected to this book, as not being evidence of anything, The French Could never be so unhappy as to have all their -law con -mined in an octavo volume; and nothing would be •easier than to buy one of these works, and introduce any interpolated passage to answer any purpose. The Counsel for the plaintiff replied, that exactly . the same specks of evidence, of the Spanish law, was received by Lord Elienborough on the trial of Sir . Thomas Picton, for torture to Louisa Calderon, where* the Attorney• General of Trinidad was admitted to prove that the books produced contained the laws of the Island. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE thought that, on the' authority of this case, he must receive the book as• evidence of the French law, though he should have greatly hesitated to do so if this precedent had not existed. If, then, he received this evidence, he was clearly of opinion that 'the marriage, void'by the law of the country where it took place, could not be re cognized here. This had been decided in the case of Dalrymple v. Dalrymple, by Lord 'Stowell, and therefore he was . bound to hold the marriage void, and the plaintiff entitled to recover. The Jury then (as the amount was not disputed) found for theplaintiff—Damages £416 17s. Qd. An Inquest was held on Saturday evening, at the Light Horseman, Orange -court, Castle-stieet, Lei cester-square, before •Mr. Higgs, Coroner, on the body of Charlotte Lewis, a woman of the town,.who was wandering about in great distress, and who waS -first taken . to St. Martin's watchhothe, and after wards to the woi khouse. Verdict—L ,, That the decea s ed came by her death through exceseite 41iuking, and the inclemency of the weather." POLICE LifIOWTOIDICE. G iVi Hairier,Jitter, Michael Jir es lbairoP M4 !M jll4l.ll"... % Ff'''' SaM P • """` .lll "t"Pf y jall un ft, ,Willisch Law, Samuel favt„(isorge Snsititl:Ast Bred ineliK, n,: g . sa t. mud pea,Thea s .ivi hmh Ntrlek, ilitederchek.P . John TralL Hen Bat cd. Gong and hews 2klines, were t Up in the,custodt olVraet4i arlaituth*ti, PeneiPal elitinrsiaidatod by Limbrlck and liend,len. and others at the Police, charged inideralte Vagrant Act, with bring fiend Ina common gambling-honsei Re i Iluey-sweet, St. James's, mad playing and betting at unlawful genuttetherein. Mr. John Itlehttioudi °neat the clurksof thii office, and C. T.l linthveo, ass stated, SW' they. accompanied Mr. Han% the Magistrate to tee house in question. , and that being refusestailmittance, Muntrucind, the patrol, 'teas hniited over the wall, who.unfastiped : the chain, and admitted the Magis trate and officer/. Al the defendants. Were found in the house, except one, who, afteia,a long search, was discover el "(but until be had cried out Om help) in a water hut:, is the yard, im mersed to the chin in a* water. A roulette table sius founit in the place, and a paper on which was written, " ifr •Gil:' is to put into the hank £ 3l, and Mr. Odell £29; silver, X 29; sovereigns, all. William Phillips was died called and sworn. 1 have been a Clerk in a counting-house, but am now out of employment. j was in the house, Nu. 16, Itury-steeet, St. James's, last evi-nOo : when the Magistrates and O ffi cers entered. The gani: IZot - t: lette was then playing. Thee were from. eighteen to twetev persons in the gambling-room. I can identity the defendant Mr. Page and 'Air. Paton, as being. actually at play at that mo ment. They had stakes on the.table. The mau now calling him self James Jones. but whom I always knew as Al r. :ctrl generally as Croupier ; he sat at the table, and paid and rectived money lost and won. lie was one of the-proprietors of the liens!, at least so considered. George Johnson acted in a similar parity, and was at the table at the time the officers entered. T ae witness also identified Hugh King and Thomas liedeisilate as taking a part in the business of the horse, and continued; the re,t were standing round the table, but I cannot say they Were pl., \ln. About eleven o'clock a bell rang, and June-, alias Odell, penal the room door, looked down, returned in great haste, and took up one of the wooden boxes, containing gold and silver, and ran up stairs; Hugh King took the other box and followed hint the remainder dispersed various ways. .1 went down to the kitchen. I had been there from tour to half-past seven in the evening, before I came here to lay information. The game ev..s then going nn, and the same persons were engaged in the ma nagement of it. Th.? defendant, Holder, is a waiter, and hands about refreshments, such as wine, tea, fruit, &c. which are sue plied gratis. James Thompson is the porter, and lets in the com pany. Peters, I.ambton, Bachelor, Pell, John Jones, Paton, Page, and Smith, I can swear to as being in the room when the alarm was given. was in the house of Harding and Co. in Pal[-malt, and was dismissed about a fortnight ago, but fur cu misconduct. hive often played ?—Witness.—Yes. You took the money when you won?— I did, but that was very seldom indeed—(Laughter). Where have you been all night?—ln the custody of an officer. Have yon,received a promise that you should not he sent to the Tread upon your giving evidence ?—Ne, I have not. I believe yo asked for the loan of some money at the house, and they refused it, and then you camehere to give information. Was ir not so?,I did ask for the loan of £ when I had lust every shilling I had, and it was refused. Mr. ALLEY then htldressed the Magistrates for upwards cf as haur, and, taking a general review of the evidence, conteneiel that there was no case made out to warrant a conviction of any of the parties. The Learned Counsel made some strong obser vations upon the Act of Parliament, by the provisions of which, he said, gentlemen of high and honourable character in the world were to be designated and punished as " rogues and vc gabonds," without having committed an immoral act. Upti a second conviction they were to be deemed "incorrigible,`' aid he liable to two years confinement, and hard labour; and if found a third time in a gaming -house, they became felons. ..nd were subject, not only to transportation, but the forfeiture of their goods and chattels. Some of the gentlemen now charge! were Officers of the Army—men who had trod the field of glory; who had not hesitated to walk up to the cannon's moutb, and to enter fearlessly the deadly breach in the service of their Kin; and Country ; and were these honourable men to he devinAl rogues and vagabonds--t be deemed incorrigible--and to be liable at some future conviction to be transported as felons? It was monstrous, end really men who passed laws should look a little to the consegoences of them before-hand. lie trusted the Magistrates would be very cautious how they enforced the pro visions of such a statute. ...... Mr. Haus, after a consultation with Mr. Mizsnutt., said— " I convict James Jones, alias Odell, Thomas Iledesdale. (;core Johnson, alias Pearce, 'igh King, Samuel Page, and John Paton, as rogues and vagabonds, within the meaning of the Sta tute of the 3d of Geo. IV. cap. 43, and sentence Jones, alias Odell, liedesdale, Johnson, and King, to three months, and Page and Paton to one month's imprisonment, in the !lonia of Correetion, there to be kept to hard labour." Titompson, John Junes, Smith, Pell, Lamhton, Pe— ters, and Batchelor, were.nrdered to give security, themselves in £5O, and two sureties In £25, that they would nut be fount) la a gaming-house for twelve months; and the remainder were dis charged, each on his own recognizance in £3O. . _ BE RMS. On Saturday, the 2lst, in Riker-street, Portman-square, the Lady of George Cleghorn, Esq. ut %Veen:, county of Roxburgh, of a daughter. Saturday morning, at her house in Bruton-street, Berkeley square, Lady Eleanor Lowther, of a daughter. In Dublin, the Lady of the bean of Confert, of a daughter. Saturday se'nnight, at Ipswich, the Lady of Capt. Wyaduwe, of the Royals, of a son. At Glasslough House, county of Monaghan, the Lady of Colonel Leslie, M.P. of a son. Thursday, the wife of John Braham, 'Esq. of a son. NI A HAI Dec. 10, the Rev. John Husband, B.A. Fellow of Magdalen College, to Charlotte, youngest daughter of the late Edwaid Jones, Esq. of Wepre klall, Fiintshire. Tuesday se'nnight, the Rev. T. Simpson, to Rath, daughter of .1. Sandwith, Esq. all of Helmsley. Wednesday, at Willem Chutch, Bath, the Rev. Win. David Longlands, Fellow of HAW College, t • Judith Can tl deo daughter of. John Pendrill, The Rev. Michael Wyatt, of North Wraxall, Wilt..., to .Lire .'tnne, youngest daughter of Thomas Hall, Esq. of llairue.i Court, Oxon. Tuesday, Mr. H. Macfarlane, surgeon, West to *, : 4 M. A. Oldham, second daughter of the late Mr. Joit•pit ham, of Melton. Thursday, at Clapham Church, Fllntoff Leathani, Esq. Pontefract, banker, to Eliza, eldest daughter ut -bum. Esq.-of Clapham Common, Surri.y. DIED. At the Glebe House, on the 6th inst. the 11::v. Alexander Hprt, .Rector of the parish of Ahabeg, county of 310rK,1111 . . The-ltev. Wm. •Bree, Rector of Allesley. llt4E (.71.•VC:lt The Rev. W. Thomas, Curate of King's I'you, agodirso. Sontiay -artnnight, at Clifton. after a long illness, the Rev. Janes Olive, late Rector of St. Paul's, Bristol, deeply lame:lto by his surviving relatives and friends. Saturday se'nnight, at Morelauds, near Limerick, Liee:. Doris, lialf.pay 97th Regiment. Saturday toe'nnight, at Old Ilrompton, aged 16, Jane Perrvi;, second daughter of the late Rev. Dr. rage, Head .IListti • Westminster School. Monklay, at his residence in Prospect-row, Bromptoa, Henry •Boys, Esq. Szcoud Lieutenant-C.4011,4 ui the of Royal Marines, quartered at Chatham. lie Ml dow,i ill St at the Alilitary Library an the preceding Fri.l::y. MA ILS. •au. flu s. AK , • .i - Dublin 9 0 France 0 o Watcriurd 1 1 Ititti•Jurgb 0 1 Guernsey And Jersey 1 0 Fiamiers 1 0 1 .I,lum 0 1 Malta u 0 HulLoirt ci 1 riotteriburgh • U 1 Lirewarti Islands 0 0 I 11rAzil 0 0 ---.. KIt;H•WATER at LOS DON URI 1)42 TO.- MOH ROW. Nl* ruing - • • 31 -trtwq■ -net 8 Attcruirbe - 18 tnirysite4 aftel 9 LON DON Vnnced ! Ind puhluchrd I v Lavin. hr:. r, plJec, leauplevlta. - 1 ~r~ '7llr