Star. — London, England, 1808-02-19 00:00:00

sotesose 411 14 „ht, of geptem * tin* after) s r4°l • n al proprietor ..of t)io crikliog piece the - leo not replied 'he, ! .. ia .mtat 'ef i raiit ►it my env or for the shooting season , onto to put a o ak to it. which Makes it to all intents and ti i e r jet m y property. He wee glad, however, that h Minies had acted so like this conscientious n they hid c ountermanded the orders they se rtima , ' Kith respect to the ne* names of the Da which , a " -- : had appeared in all the public prints. T o ' lad that they had restored . to the ships their ' ll4 eon es, and was happy to warless this slight evi . e f e ven nomad honesty. With respect to the ege ~, a e precedent, he was concerned to dissent from 1 ' - ' N o ble and Learned Friend on the Woolsack--the c' cited his Noble Friend did not, in his opinion, 6 • -- ' te before their Lordsh ips. There was no ly t o t hat iiii ga tien whatever on the part o f this country to re goe to the revolutionized state of Holland the ships o o to Stadtholder. Had the Stadtholder sist3kenin-edinat the head of the Dutch Government and tad a peace been concluded between the States and dee then and in that case, he was of opinion I lis t4at c : u e e o uliba; e precedent boundto T restore those ships. the of onion, he believed Feb r espect to Ito 'kilts in error he . would be corrected) that the te je o fleet was deposited in our hands on the exprets 'condition of their being restored on the restoration of tnaa ; and in the treaty D onem them was li f e r as he understood, syllable said by f rame indicative of any claim to that fleet. [To told Sidmouth signified his assent.] was noting fur which he was more anxi tut there than thewtO the world that what we did was me tha Jed the oork of Mere necessity, and that that ne cessity once at an cnd, wc scorned to enter into any pit d u i. ca l cu lation of turning it to our own advantage. If as w as pretended, the rigorous necessity of the case ca ged us to an aggression of the strong against the yak, let us net descend to the sordid consideration of * pp r ig the fruits of that aggression to the best ac. The case that bad been cited by a Noble , aof a neutral vessel being subject to seizure for on.ying on enemy's goods, did net apply had by th de a -very act of carry i ng enemy's goods, the s t t oted from her professed neutrality, and was ns of no lager entitled to the privileges and ex t i neutrality. He exhorted their Lordships to consider the motion now before them, with all that serious at tention it demanded, and concluded by concurring in the 'sentiments of the Noble mover, that had he voted with Ministers upon every sta g e in which the policy or justice of the Copenhozen expedition had been broueht into question, he still should have felt it his duty to have voted for the resolution proposed by the Noble Viscount. Lord WESTMORLAND was convinced that the arguments and views of the Noble Viscount who made the motion were founded in the purest motives, but like all subjects which involve political interests, and great questions of-state, there must be a differ ence of opinion. On this ground he rose to oppose the proposition before their Lordships. Waiving the principle of the motion altogether, he would say, that this country must be in a most deplorable condition indeed, nay, reduced to the lowest state of degrada tion and ruin, if it were not able, at the close of the war, at least with Denmark, to restore the ships taken at Copenhagen, or at all events to make testis tution for theme—therefore' the present discussion must be at an end, if their Lordships thought that, under any circumstances, we ought to do the one or the other. With respect to the attacks made by Noble Lords on the other side, as to the injustice, cruelty, and despotism exhibited in our attack, he shouldonlyobserve, thathlinisters, thought themselves justified, under all the circumstances of the case,to un dertake the expedition, thinking it necessary to the security of the empire. But surely such charges ill. accorded with the conduct of the late Ministers when *office, the they had avowed a determinetion to vin dicate the rights, the independence, and maritime Supremacy of England, on the very ground assumed and acted upon by their successors. He was well aware that the object of the motion was to censure by a side-wind the present Ministers ; but why not tvow it, and boldly tell their Lordships and the pub lic, that such was their intention ? He and his col leagues were ready to meet any, attack of that kind, conscious that they had conducted themselves under the difficulties of the State in the best manner for averting the danger with which we were menaced.- liewing the question in this light, and differing from the Noble Viscount who made the motion, he should sit down with stating that he must, if it were pushed ,to a divisiOn, vote against it. Lord SELKIRK= supported the present motion, 'though he approved of the expedition. The Noble Lord argued for a shOrt time, to shew that there was too inconsistency in his conduct. Lord REDESDALE contended that the motion d the Noble Viscount meant to convey a direct ce sure, not only on the present Ministers, who had planned the expedition, but also on the Parliame nt of the Kingdom, whic h had sanctioned, by its deci sion, the onginal proceedings, Surely then nothing could be more inconsistent or contradictory, thanfor those who had supported the expedition, and acknow ledged its necessity, to pass sentence of reprobation i on the result of it. Lord DARNLEY conceived that the honour and interest of the country should bait prevented us, in the . first instance, from carrying • the plan conceived Nernst Copenhagen into execution ' • but it did not w, that because that act of viol ence and of un justifiable aggression had been committed, that we were to add infamy to iniquity. There surely must arrive a state of things, and an interchange of rela tions between both Countries, which we should now, while we have it in our power, anticipate, and that with the utmost desire and sati sfaction. He felt him self, therefore, called on to support the motion. Lord MULGRAVE conceived that the object of the motion, if carried, would convey a direct charge on the present Administration, which was not jusu fied by their conduct, particularly in respect to Copen hagen. He was certain, that Noble Lords could not mean to recommend the restoration of the Danish fleet at this moment ; if so, they had not considered the means which the Danish Government would in that case possess of annoying and attacking us, in obeo dience and in conformity to the wishes of the enemy. Nothing could be more dangerous or destructive than the increase of the enemy's power, under any cir cumstances, but especially when the possession of such a fleet as that of Denmark would afford eeeryfacility. , . ,for eMecting., .their Purpose. He hardy tit ~ ... . that air Lordships would come tO e. 'on fauna kvhat the Noble Viscount2. l. '. 143 k litliteCt6Ch I.. t oid GlLEN.V j l t i e ll took a titbit iieili itTsc.,./1.16".1 1401 heads of airunent ,urged by his Mai fy y * Ma sisters, aad conauXectwith stating. that lie was de 7 b cidedly of opinion that the greatest service would ;vault to this country from the restoration of the Dinish fleet, even under` existing circumstances, if that Power could be thus conciliated. What danger could arise from this act tif justice and retribution, to a nation whose independance we had so grossly vio lated ? What ! did Noble Lords fear that the power of France would be materially reduced by this sub traction, as it was considered, of the Danish Navy ?--;- i Those who thought so knew little of the means and resources of Denmark ? Did the Danes want mate rials for the building of a navy ? Those they had in as great abundance as England. Did they want arse nals or dock-yards ? Those also they possessed equal to this country. But it might be said that they could not, perhaps, build a navy, even with those advan tages, because they wanted money : this, however, was an expectation which would prove fallacious, for it could not be supposed that in the present state of I Europe the Danish Government would not be able to procure pecuniary aid, and all other resources neces- i sary for carrying its hostility into effect against us. Nothing, in his mind, could be more ridiculous than the notion, that by taking sixteen or eighteen ships from the Danes, we had established our own security, and completed the ruin of their navy. On the whole, he must declare himself in support of the present mo tion, because it demonstrated to Europe that the peo ple of this country were perfectly alive to a sense of honour, and of that proud national feeling which al ways distinguished them. They would not aver with his Majesty's Ministers, that the Crbwn.Prince had committed hostility against this country by his refusal to compromise the interest, the honour, and the in dependence of Denmark. Even the present Ministers did not attempt to bring forivard any ground for sanctioning their violation of any principle which had been hitherto acted on by civilized nations. Lord HAWKESBURY agreed with the Noble , Baron, that if the Crown Prince had only resisted an attack made on the Danish Navy, there might be ground for the observations which their Lordships had just heard ;, but when it was known that there was not only a hostile mind, but that it had been manifested by an avowal of a determination to co operate with the enemy, what then was the country to do, but to resort to every means for its security and protection ? Having put ourselves in possession of the fleet of Denmark, were we to be called on at this moment to surrender it, when the Danish Govern ment had declared for Bonaparte, and entered most cordially into his views of ruining us both by sea and land ? This was in its& a proposition so fatal to the country, that he was certain it could not be the inten tion of the Noble Viscount to propose or maintain it; but the motion would have that effect, and therefore he trusted that their Lordship s would, by their votes that night, give an additional proof of their confidence in his Majesty's Government. Lord SIDMOUTH spoke in reply. After the armed neutrality in 1801, the Danish islands were restored - in the same condition in which they were when taken. He declared that his motion was not intended to censure his Majesty's Ministers, but to do an act of justice, and to regain the affections of a brave people. The House then divided, when there appeared— For the Motion, 31 Against it, 61 Proxies, ' 20 Proxies, 44 Majority. —sl' —.105 54 ' Adjourned at Two o'clock. . HOUSE OF COMMONS. Sir THOMAS TURTON moved to revive three Orders of the last Session, founded upon motions of his own, fur Papers respecting the Polygar War, and Carnatic Affairs, which were revived accordingly. Mr. G. PONuONBY moved for Copies of such additional C o mmunications as had been, received by his Majesty's Ministers, respecting the increased rigour of the French Government, iu exe cuting the Decree of the Bth December.—Ordered. Mr. HUSKISSON presented the Ten Million Exchequer Bills BilL—Read the first time, and ordered - for the second reading to- morruw. Committed the Bank Unclaimed Dividends Bill, and the Sur veyor of Cuutoma Abolition Bill; and ordered to be reported„to- morrow. Read the third time the American Treaty Bill; passed, and ordered to the Lords. The SECRE I'ARY at WAR presented the Army Estimates for the Year, and gave notice he should move them to-morrow se'nnight. A Person from the Ordnance Department presented the Ord nance Estimates for Great Britain and Ireland for the Year.—Or dered to be printed. The Report from the Commissioner; for regulating Offices in the House of Commons was presented, and ordered to lie en the Table. Su. JOHN LUBBOCK presented a Petition from the Company of Merchants traCin.; to the Levant Seas.—Ordered to lie tartlte Table. • Mr. WILLIAM TAYLOR g ave notice of a motion for this day se'nnight, relative to the conveyance of specie from e Spanish Colonies to this Country. The Thanks of the House were voted to the Rev. lone CHAS , rm. WOODHOUSE' Chaplain of the House, for his Sermon before the Commies, at St. Margaret's Church, on Wednesday last. . It was ordered, on the motion of Mr. G. PONSONBY, that there be laid before the House an Account of an Danish Ships de tained as Prizes, and now pending the judgment of the Adndralty Court in this Country, or of Ships detained as suspected of car rying Danish Property, on the like circumstance, since hostilities vaarmernoed against Denmark. Mr. T. catgrwipLE mated for some additional Papers on etc subject of the Dardanellesquestion, namely, Copies or Extracts from Instructions sent to his Majesty's Minister .at the Porte, touching the line of conduct he was to pursue there, in relation to the cause of Russia, and more especially after the Continental Confederacy of MS.—Ordered. Colonel WOOD gave notice of a motion for to-morrow, for Copies of the Insumetion• sent out from this Country respecting the Military and Naval Force sent against the Dardanelles and EliPt r . DUNbAS obtained leave to brink in a Bill for continuing the Scotch Bankrupt Laws. COLD NAM FIELDS PRISON. Mr. SHERIDAN rose to Members a petition from . the late Foreman and several Members of the Grand' Jury of the County Atf Middlesex, respecting the abuses existing in the prison of Cold Bath Fields. It would be in the recollection of the House, that he had • upon a former occasion, namely, in the year 1800, called the attention of Parliament and his Majesty's Ministers, to the gross abuses then existing in the conduct and management of that prison. On that occ asion, honoured-by the aid of the worthy Baronet I mar him ( Sir FRANCIS BURDETT), he stated such • cas es, and aid such strong ground to przve the abso lute necessity of some immediate investigation of those abuies, as to interest the attention ei Govern- discouraging purpok tin that occasiun Might. _ . terred him from complying; •on this occasion, with the request of those very respectable portions, whose names were annexed to the petition in his hand, by offering it to the House. . It was signed by Mr. Stevens; the respectable Foreman of the late Grand Jury of the county of Middlesex ; by Mrs Phillips, one of the present Sheriffs of London, who had very laudably e:.-- erted himself indiscovering and collecting abuses inure several prisons of the Metropolis, and by sieve:tad other members of the Grand Jury who herd visited•the his son, and witnessed, with their own eyess- the =bow agaiest which ihey Awe; prayed the linerfeetuciudt Parliament. ...)I,adbut .another observable aim* namely, that the Peitisios whams he held- ire hitlehof did not proceed from any party motive, aisderairdray, , ted for no other purpose than for the redress of extol Ling abuses, which were reproachful to the Police, * I not to the Jurisprudence et* the country. It was ells i ways his principle, that.n ostler to.obtain the Teams , of such grievances, application should always be 1 , made in the first instance to his Majesty's Govern ment, to try what they, in their discretion, should be inclined to do, and if they should refuse to interfere, then he thought application should be made to the Legislature. Such was the advice he had- given to the worthy persons who had placed this Petition in his hands ; and he understood the Foreman had been honoured by a conference with the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite to him (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) the ultimate result of which was, a re quest to him to present. the Petition. For the pre sent, therefore, he should only move, that the Petition be received, read, and lie on the table ; assuring his Majesty's Ministers, that if they should feel inclined, to take up the subject, institute an inquiry, and in troduce such measures as they should feel just and necessary on the subject, he should most cheerfully resign to them all the credit and popularity of the case ; but if, after lying a reasonable time on the table, it should not receive due notice from them, he should feel it his duty to bring forward the subject for Parliamentary interference. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that after what had just been observed by the Right Honourable Gentleman, as his conception of the mode of originating a business of this nature, and since he had come forward to the House with a Petition, foregoing that mode, it became a question how far Government ought now to interfere. It was true, some of those Gentlemen, whose names were to the Petition, had certainly called on him, and he had advised them to represent the matter to the Secretary of State, to whom if it should appear, on further inquiry, that grievances, such as stale did really exist, no time should be lost in adopting the necessary measures for redress. The cornmu nication, he believed, took place so far far back las Michaelmas Sessions; no representation of the kind had been since made, and therefore he con cluded that a satisfactory explanation had been given. Now whether or not the officers of the exe cutive Government should have been resorted to, on this subject, before it was brought forward for Parlia mentary notice, was for the consideration of the Ho nourable Gentleman who had conceded that Govern ment ought to have an opportunity of considering how far they ought to interfere, and what steps they should deem the best to pursue, before an appeal was made to the Legislature. He felt no disposition to oppose the motion for laying the Petition on the table, though he thought the mode of introducing it savou- , red somewhat of party feeling, and that the Right Hon. Gentleman, in thus bringing it forward, had i acted contrary to the very principles he himself had laid down. Mr. SHERIDAN said, that the Petitioners in this instance were warranted, by the fate of the Petition of 1800, to the subject agaiii under a Parlia mentary view, as a sort of collateral stimulus to the justice of his Majesty's Ministers ; for upon the former occasion it must be recollected, that n,awithstanding all the formality of a Commission of Inquiry, and after a voluminous Report of those Commissioners was laid upon the table, no one measure was ever adopted, nor any step taken in consequence, to re dress the grievances complained of ; and instead of adopting the one radical measure of redress, namely, the dismissal of Mr. Aris, the Chief Governor of the Prison, he received even more protection and support than he ever bad before ; and this was the mo tive for placing the subject now under the eye of Parliament. • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER Said the motive which probably prevented the Governs ment of the day from taking any steps on the subject was, that the Parliament to whom the Report was made, recommended no measure for adoption. Mr. SHERIDAN said, that Parliament forbore, depending upon the Government. The Petition was received and read. It was dated Saturday, Nov. 3, 1807, and was signed by the Fore man and eleven of the Grand Jury of Michaelmas ses 'ion ; and it complainedof short weight, not only in the bread delivered to prisoners, to the amount of from one to two ounces in some of the daily loaves, but that each prisoner lo it, by deficient weight even inthepri son pound weight, kept for the purpose of a check, for such bread. It complained that persons against whom no proofs of,aay crimehadbeensubstantiatedbeforethe Magistrates, were sent back to that prison under pre tence of reexamination, and sent to solitary confine ment in cold cells, eight feet three inches long, by three feet two inches wide. It stated, that the Petiti oners found a mother, a daughter and son of credita. ble a ppearance, in s.parate cells, their health exposed to injury from the cold extetnal air, without any war mth from fuel, while even the felons wen allowed a large fire in the common room ; it stated the distress ing case of a female, a foreigaer,,smt there wader a tempora ry privation of her reason, in which situation she was debauched by one of the sons of Governor tli. i , p -. .4 peritA 4 4fir wit, Signed by men, who , hi fae; ceased ""'"k Se licit. .- ~.„ • Nfichiarriac,. ,, .• •. , . . Mr. SINE RIDAti said, hd 11k/tight ilia . . ji .. thiti-;• riii i f 4 cal•an attention to - fos viola be a hail e.- .". the4lspeisition of the lititrie, and of 'his Mailltep. '.4 „, Ater* lir solvieAt j tiln Sit amended . shape:' , :...' • f 1 -L'MroliVitil..= AD Supported the arg .. :( Mf p4lVE ic r is• ril : a4ohied • • ii.A . . lii:ob • .• •': ;A I Stitnner, Upon therehtba of • ' 111% .4 ,.. '' -i bt3no meansin 'Ortlisit %Ilse . .' ... Ilt 7 " /tight Honbiksh GentliftWintild .. - •.. _sr draw k itor die !stencil* Aroi 4 o ctf . i U UlAge thorengteesibliertb At of &e Nut* he gli*li z hintselfris setetted it. ••• i'' - 4 **:"',3 ./ , 4 • ir ' 1161101411t1DAN nedili4 = s ag pgitii#l6ollllbedis priniiVh , . . o l eic , 1 mo. - tir.' ,re ~- ' lllMlStrixerhek-rincriote. ' " 4 /trsicl” The Hone* itaalig pititeeded, at the cri -kW? evening; to ballot A Conimittee on the Writtlaghdia PEW • ,the fallowing Wt/re the Menthol chosen :- - . - 'arab ii.v C. Domaine, Esq. Lord Jocelyn -.::elan es.. H. Treinayne, fisq 7 Sir William Lemma ...r7 - t -7. Vt. Hawkins, Fig: * • W. Winne, Esq. _,_ „4 lir P. 114101141k s t.: • T. G.M , dard, Esq. .. 4 . 7" :•. . . R. t • Hen. W. J. Creevey, Esq. • .••••.71rms .A. H. licidstrorth, Eas. . Right Hou. J. C. VEEN* . e fie IL Morris, Esq. 6ir J. Anstruther ~..,, -.,i ~,.... stn stout Pol4tatal 1 Mr. DENT rose, and said, that* in ordetaille-Ventlemeo ihould not be carried away by impallsticins injuilinis - `to the character of an Hen. Baronet, from the imputations of an Hell. Member, en a former night, respequa. *.g e remittance of the value of the wised seized from him, he should now move for certain papers illu , :rar tive of that transaction, as well as those of the meritorious &Arse ' ter and conduct of that Han. Baronet. He, therefore, moved for a copy of the memorial of Sir Home Popham to his Majesty, Id. 117 es, praying leave of absence ; and of a lettat from Sir MO Stevens to Sir Home, signifying his Majesty's permission , . on tn. signing his half pay. Also a series of other papers respecting the voyage of Sir Home in the Etrusco to India, the Ipgrobation of the Governor and Council of his services there,hod their recom mendation of him to the Court of Directors at ome, and dews to' the restoration of Sir Homes property in the ship President and, her cargo.—Ordered. Mr. LO NG gave notice, that he should move on to-morrow fot papers to sheet that the restoration of Sir Home Popham of his property, in that instance, was an act of justice. Mr. LUSHINGTON wished to know what the Hon. Gentle man meant to prove by the documents fur which he had moved. Mr. DENT answered, his object was to take the earliest oppor tunity, in the absence of the Honourable Baronet, occasioned by the unfortunate accident of fracturing his leg, to vindicate his character from the imputations that had been thrown upon him; and in reference to a notice of a motion given by an Honourable Gentleman. . Mr: LUSHINGTON said, his notice of a motion respected the conduct of the HMI. Baronet in respect to the American vend Prioident,for which he had exchanged the &now, for the pur pose of violating the charter of the East India Comp any, and ob-. taming colourablk ship's papers, to coins Ids project.—The Hon. Member was called to order. Mr. LUSHINOTON said, he was about to move for papers; and as he was not certain shay would be granted him, was alp stating grounds foi his motion. He, however, bowed to the aur a thorny of the Chair, and said the misfortune of the Hun. 'Baronet ; and of some other bf his talially, furnished motives sufficient to dissuade him from goingfarsher into the .object at present. * Hi should only move for. certain document* to justify WS eendliCt CO a former night, snd to illiotrate the subjectpreparatory to a future investigation. He concluded by moving ter a long series of pa pers, containing copies ofthe correspondence of Sir Home witheaa riots departments of Government, the charter-patty, and tithe .hip's papers, belonging to the ship President, and various dace:- • merits on the proceedings thereon, before the Admiralty Court, with the decree of the. Court itself. The CHANCELLOR ofthe EXCHEQUER wished to knoW from the Hots. Gentleman, the nature and object of the moths he meant to found upon those documents. . , Mr. LUSHINGTON explained,#at it was the object he ori ginally avowed, namely, to sheW that the grant of 25;0001. to'Sie H. Popham was a misapplication of tilearublic money. Mr. LONG said, he alsoddieel it Illy to prove the contritil The Papers were ordered „ i i..••• ' °untie 13.• AIL. The Order of the Day . being read for the second reading of the Bill for carrying into effect the Orderi of Council respecting neutral ships, Mr. EDEN rose, to declare his sentiments shortly against the Bill. He would leave it to the Gentleasen of more eloquent abilities to expatiate on the mischief: vous principles of the Bill, as violating both national and municipal laws; while he'should content himself with protesting against it, as a measure, not, as it was professed bole. of retaliation upon the enemy; or to crush the power of the Tyrant of France, bit# of injury to neutral nations, and of vengeance against the unoffending, for the injury done to ns by the ene my, more especially of injury to America. In con sidering this subject, he wished to discard from his view every thing on the doctrine of retaliation, witli this single remark, which he conceived to be the great principle of the Law of Nations ; namely, that re prisals against' an enemy can be no excuse for injur ing an unoffending nation ; but the consequence of carrying into effect those orders . against the ships of the United States, would be an indirect violation of that principle. He would be glad to know,'where his Majesty's Ministers had revoked the assurances they had given to America, or whether they proposed to execute the orders rigorously. If so, he foresaw the most dePlorable consequences to the commerce and connexion 'between the two countries, and that we should adopt the law of retaliation with much greater severity towards America than towards France, who had unequivoCally relaxed - the severity of her decrees towards America. Sir JOHN NICHOLLS supported the Bill.— The policy of the measure, and its inconsistency with the law of nations, he observed, could only be decided upon from a view of the circumstances from which it originated. The decree of Bonaparte, which was intended for the purpose of excluding us from the commerce of the world, was the great original cause from which the necessity of this measure was deriveci. Aczording . to this decree, an American, or any °dies neutral, might bring the produce of their different countries to Britain, but were forbidden to take there a single bale of our commodities, under the penalty of confiscation. It therefore became the duty, as well as the interest of every neutral natibii, to repel, by every means,, the effects of such a violent Mee- • . - • - . , ~_. ...i. .. , CreateAtitt4tAtta."'"' Ali* a -'; . ' - '..• 4' . f . -. Ver ifirt: ilieti's, • .00t t - - '•- . : • elisi,•at Enka MIAs • '•is :. •,....'• . ~- ....' . : that lirliy. Co . ' - .“ •t e ris, 4 . e uß fi*lsof *be stue . tl . if dirriir.. - found four . dof.f . ;;16 . ~. • . ~: etA . te .i.. 7 • , P41 ) %;. i 1t UpT s; id • ;report of , •fit hW against nt • ..e*dt c .!,,,,, •,......1 . ...' at ti c ll" ...; ts.. . .whi.ciii - 400 .is. *Aim x .• thi' Pit 16414, "g'*%lst ,l i t t °klbi''''" ' ' 1 7..r."' • - is - t,' ' akfissumurs did Aot, Ana -the.staistiai,ibnitas to' preeeding fletsiort;;lircidigti,: s iir Ifi;"'‘..l . ' found the. rum 'of z theie eskutuity, yet they were Catinty-c6tittaiOdU,.tciritill,dtai ',' : - • . • .. found suffietendy•nunierous. And stating tO4natify - die don. They i/.nieltiefed 'fly b. •-• ' ' *. ttiat . representation which had beettiiistda- : Perhaps tie very tif-tlise thattif irai die i*fitt. O %tilt tWo Ministers of that day were influenced, in not siccing inspection ; 4nd ttrit (Frey were conellictl* ilk., upon the report of the Committee, by not beifig dis- teqsire bolifiry-ircinldhaike in'abled,iffetrto'4l 'atkir:, posed to be influenced by popular chuhour. How. abuses still nidreglaiiirand nufilertins., : ; 4 - ',_ . , ever that might be, the redress proposed was entirely Mr. SVMNBRThad hoisbjection ti thOW s titian, i ,l)iik abandoned. But, discouraging. as the failure of his thought the - Molise riltild not'Oielielt dlirelt plft r „ nun:6k tin that occasion Might . be, it had not de- potted to be the petitiOn Of a Ora n& Jur?, and WA, • _ • i ~_ —..... ..,;.1...... ;...; et,..4 , _ ,-.)ssed ttl fie so last r r ~ I 1 s jar al; illedges ground riafy )sed ofs lenCe2 sl int°, S.! throitii L e pIeAG Lr ~ ionc4 dab d br cep. abet ittne, es. tionai. ed the ma!4 Ist d nly thee' algov case ' sea e pr:' n 6 P 1 in e kre le r 1