Star. — London, England, 1822-05-25 00:00:00

the duty of the year 1812 be giverrup, are. elit AT ticie would be on- the same tooting as to 'tax a; i t was from the time of Queen dime to the year hear).—But he must warn the House that. unless it watched in this case, the.consumer Would be in danger of being deprived of his just berte fi t . The House must be as wary in this instance as i t was With regard to the brewers not long back, and the remission of duty should not take place till t ; : ey had a fair experimental assurance of fair dealing _4llpar, hear).—He said this, because he thought the reduction in the price of leather since the peace did not b ra ' A fair proportion to the reduction in other articles. ~jut, if accompanied with a bonajde reduction, it vou id prove of great benefit to the inferior classes, l %v t fl raid their full share towards the consumption ef commodity--(Hear, hear).—The amount of ; his reduction would be 300,0001. The amount of die whole revenue from the tax on leather was 600,0001, an d thus one-half would be given up—(Hear, hear). He had got so far in the work of remission ; but be L i d great satisfaction in saying that he was not yet at the end of his Budget—(Hear! and langhter). He had another reduction to propose, which he thought was equally desirable. They had all heard, on the subje:t of a Bill relative to the Navigation Laws, that no twithstanding the general benefit to Commerce, from the liberal principles of trade arising from the relaxation of those laws, there was one important in terest which did not particicate in that benefit, but, on tl.e contrary, languished in depression. He allude I to the Shipping Interest, and he thought that any al tevia.ion of the burdens upon that interest _would spew a most gratelul protecting spirit on the part of the !louse, at the same time that it assisted one of the was: important branches of the commercial i,aterest of the country. He proposed, therefore, that the ton rage duty granted during the war should be discos. tinned. This was iu amount 100,0001. which, added '01,3.50,0004 the amount of the remission of taxation on tla. other articles before specified, would be in all 1,930,0001.—(Hear, hear).—This was more than was warranted by the anticipated. saving of 1,800,0001. clear of the 400,0001. to be reserved from the whole 0290.0031. But he expected that the remission of the S.tlt Tax might operate an increase in the revenue front increased consumption to the extra amount.-:-' He certainly hoped that the remission of two milliOus. of taxes would not produce an ultimate loss to the PahUc—(Hear, hear).—He hoped that he had thus, without entering into any very minute and particular calculation, s,rtliciently explained the principles.of the mod.: of management, so as to'be fully understood by the House. This way of accomplishing the wishes of the House was better than the other, and the House ought not to sacrifice an advantage because it could Lot be obtained through the means originally con templated. It rather became it to try some other arrangeinent, if it found that impracticable. He was decidedly of opinion that the arrangemeiits . he had stated to the House were capable of all the benefits bel;ad in view, and were likely to be attended with as aitue disadvantage as was inseparable from a plan of this nature. He therefore hoped ti at the Com mittee would allow him to move his first Resolution. —Tile Right Hon. Gentleman sat down amidst loud cheering from all parts of the House.The.fcillowing was then put horn the Chair : " That it is the opinion of this Committee, That, for the pur pose of- apportioning, conformably to the Resolutions of this House of the 3d day of this instant month of May, the burden. occasioned by the Military and Naval Pensions, it is expedient that an equal annual Annuity of £2,800,000, terminable at the end of 45-years, should, from the sth day of April, 1822, be veited in trustees to hemmed by Parliament ; and that the said Annuity should be charged upon the Consolidated Fund of the United Kingdom Of Great Britain and Ireland." Mr. CALCRAFT congratulated the House on what had fallen from the Right Hon. Gentleman. He (Mr:C.) must have fallen into a great Mistake, when, at the .commencement of the Session, he thought the Right Hon. Gentleman had stated, that the remission of taxation would do no good. On the Salt Tax, the Chancellor of the Exchequer had gone. far beyond him; for he (Mr. C.) had only proposed a remission' f five shillings in the first year; while the Right Hon. Gentleman had repealed 13s. out of 15s. The course of the Chancellor of the Exchequer that night was an encouragement to perseverance on his side of the House. He was not prepared to say how far the fisheries could bear the Tax ; but still the e oin g away of the machinery would be a great boon. At the same time he was of opinion that the duty on French salt should be increased. He did not well understand the plan of the Right Hon. Gentleman. Ilad the Right Hon. Gentleman only, in his first Re solution, substituted the Sinking for the Consolidated . Fund, the whole would have been easy and dbvious. tit the Noble Lord and the Chancellor of the Ex chequer had said much more against remission of tat ation, than against the encroachment on the Sink- Fund. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY should be ex ;:emely sorry to cloud the happy dawn that so cre ditably sat upon the faces of the Hon. Gentlemen op. polite. Should the fisheries of the country be in jured by the duty, that would, of course, be an object of consideration for the House. At the same time he the Marquis of Londonderry) would be guilty of de 1...310n if he held out the hope that this great remis sion of taxation would relieve the most suffering part the community. As to the plan itself, the Public. °Uhl now be theirown Contractors. There was no c; , croachment on the Sinking Fund, till it had reached 'its maximum at compound interest. if the Honour- Gentleman wished to marry the two Funds, there eculd.beu Sinking Fund of ten millions. Sir J. NEWPORT had no wish to disturb the hat.; I molly' of the evening; but he rose to express his site.' ..ere satisfaction that the Chancellor of the Exchea quer had acceded to the wishes of Ireland, as to the repeal of the Window Tax. The repeal of the - Hearth - Tax would also be attended with much advantage to Leland. the present plan was more acceptable to hoe than in the hands of any contractors, though he wooid have preferred the mode of the Sinking Fund. Sit R. SHAW thanked the Right Hon. Gentleman in the name of his constituents, and of Ireland at hir; ; L., for the boon that had been conferred upon her. lk Lad hardly anticipated so favourable a result. lhr CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, in LO 4 ti.gestion from the last speaker, ptated that all pel 1:)laS who had compounded for their As- Lessed Tans, and made payments beyond the sth of 11 0 1 0411 - sow b. collected %those a considerable V IM MAO. Nebbid % itttaidity Jett 001,16 . 00 t stead ot layhita k 44 cid 6 the Plait* *bn 4 ta be bettel to dimaish the bounty. as rather to take off rho tas almorther. • Th• ainiows mods tif raising the Miley oeseesary for the repeal of the taxes would he to make use or die Finking Fond. 'fie plan Of the 'Chancellor of the Exchequer inWered spaterially with that Fund. He trusted the House would not epee to the appointment of a double set of Commis-, ;loners. From Ll2OO the expense of the Sinking Fund had increased to £6900 annually. He should move that the Commissioners should supply the dif ference between 0,800,000 and five Millions out of thi Sinking Fund. He could not conceive in what way the Noble Lord could snake out a Sinking Fund of ten millions. The Marquis of LONDONDERRY explained. Mr. CURWEN hoped the whole duty on rock salt would be taken off; and he then believed the trade is that article world become very considerable. What had passed that night in the House would give great satisfaction to the country ; and also materially be nefit the agriculturist. Mr. DAVENPORT testified his satisfaction at what had taken place. He hoped the subject of cheese and butter would come under the consideration of Government. Mr. W. SMITH was sorry that the tax had not been wholly repealed, as by that means the whole of the machinery would be done away. lie-could also have wished, thatthe Leather:fax had been wholly given up. Mr. J. BENETT reverie'', that the Salt Tax had not been wholly. repealed. He would rather have seen the whole of the Salt Tax taken away, and the Leather Tai let's's it was. Mr. BAIGHT wished the whole duty on Salt had been removed; at the same time he felt much-plea sureAtt what had been done. The removal -of the Tolisrage Duty would also be of thilCll e Servic to. the . §Okpping Interest. - Mr. HOTCHINSON would suggest .to . --the Hon. -Member for Aberdeen to postpone hii Amendment to the bringing up of the Report. He begged leave to ' thank the Right Hon. Gentleman for the attention he . 1 bed paid to the interest of Ireland. Mr. RICARDO hoped that his Hon. Friend would' persist in Ms moticin. . He, too, felt gratified at the 'proceedings of that evening. At the same time he did not think the Ministers:vikre entitled to the gratitude of the House. The sNme of the Chancellor of the Exchequer was onl?an annual loin; the transaction was neither more nor less than adencroachment on the Sinking Fund. . . Mr. T. WILSON was much Mortified at the failure of the former'plan; but was compelled to designate the present as an encroachment on the Sinking Fund. He wished that the Wool Tax had been taken off, as it pressed heavily on the manufacttirer. Mr. MAI3ERLY was surprised thatthe Chancellor of the Exchequer was praised for taking off two mil lions of taxes, when he was, in fact,' negociating a loan to enable him to reduce the taxes. The Chan cellor of the Exchequer had talked iif keeping up credit by a Sinking Fund, when he must have known that the nation wished for no such thing. Thii was nothing more than an ordinary loan, for everyone of them wa, intended to be paid off by a Sinking Fund in forty-five years. If the House consented to this; it would be lending itself to rob the Public, - when the money might be taken from the Sinking Fend. Mr. HUSKISSON joined in congratulations on this reduction of taxes, which he hoped would be echoed through the country. It was no fraud on the country to get rid of a dead expense, which was gra dually diminishing, without resorting to the Sinking Fund. He was satisfied we had not a surplus of revenue applicable to the discharge of these annui ties. This measure was no infraction of the Sinking Fund, and would not hinder the reduction of the Public Debt—(Hear). Mr. H. GURNEY preferred the proposition of the Hon. Member for Montrose to that of the Chancellor of the Exchequer. Lord J. RUSSELL said, that if the Sinking . Fund was but the surplus of the Revenue, it was arithme tically clear that if they took away two millions from the surplus revenue, we should have, out of five mil lions, but a Sinking Fund of three millions. He was one of those who lamented the laying on of three mil lions of taxes in 1819; and he now rejoiced that this year they had taken away £3,400,000. At the SAMe time he wished theSinkingFund done away altogether. Alderman HEYGATE had an objection to the re duction of taxes eithout a reduction of expenditure also. This was burdening posterity with that which we should pay. He thought, instead of the repeal, the' seduction of the window-tax would have given the most satisfaction. He eulogized the Sinking Fund, as being of the greatest use to Ministers during the last war, In the raising of kans at a very cheap rate.— Thi`s measure, however, was nothing more or less than to raise an annual loan in the market for 45 years. Mr. W. WILLIAMS said, that for every Loan a Sinking 'Fund of one per cent. was to be upheld, in order to pay off each of those Loans in 45 years. This contract with the Public had been broken, and yet the Chancellor of the Exchequer talked of public faith, and the support of public credit. He differed from the whole system of -finance contained in the present measure. We must come back to a natural state, such as that of SO years ago, and that could only i be done by getting rid of a Sinking Fundaltogether. Mr. CRIPPS thought the Chancellor of the Ex chequer deserving of praise for this reduction ; but if some observations were not made on it, the Public ' would not derive any benefit froth it, because tracles- 1 men would not make the adequate reductions in the p r ices of their articles. The Committee then divided.—For the Original Resolutioris 115—For the Amendment 55—Majority 80.—The Resolutions were accordingly agreed to. Ni-. HUME said, that as he was sure this measure was intended to break up the Sinking Fund in, as in direct manner, he should, on bringing pp the Report, take the sense of the House as to applying at once to • the Sinking Fund for the money to be required.. on tLiaw met, these& - Paulkin wher" be Vidloi "isadat Mr. DENMAN was to be made a irobjeet legislation at all, tho sninem &mild be sevetie. He coMil not, boweter, seppoft VI ille i r p p s v . , to Meantime* its a discretionary poser.: m Mr. Anlerman BETGATE ti tit the 11111 *odd be lowed to an to a Committee. Mr. DAVIES GILBERT opposed the Mr. Alderman C. SMITH said, there was one animal not within the pale of the law, that was the poor donkey !—( A laugh, and cry of—" Spoke! polte !") The House then divided—For the second reading, 49—. For the Amendment, le—Majority for the Bill, 11. The Bill was read a second time, and committed for Monday sennight.—Adjourned to Thuisday. SEDUCTION. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MAY 24. OWYNNZ V. JINXING. • This was an action brought by the plaintiff, - a widow, to recover damages from the defendant, for the seduction of her daughter. Serjeant Lass stated, that the case he was about to open was one of the most atrocious he.had ever met with in the whole course of his professional experience. The plaintiff bad been left a widow with three daugh -1 sets and.a.son, and carried on, for their support, the business of a small public-house, at Meldreth, about I,ten miles from Cambridge. The business, however, was found to be scarcely adequate to the occasion,. and the plaintiff found it necessary to remove to Cambridge for the purpose of making greater efforts, leaving her family and the public-house under the '.management of her father and mother-in-law, during 1 her absence. Susannah Sophia Gwynne, the unfor tunate subject of this action, was the eldest daughter. She was then but 16 years of age. The defendant was a medical man, and professionally attended the family, and it was at Meldreth, in the absence of the mother, he broke the confidence reposed in him, and took advantage of the weakness of the child. This intercourse took place in 1820. The unfortunate young woman could not long conceal the come- quences. She was deliver ed of a child in the following year. The defendant was at the time SO years of age. Here the Learned Serjeant commented upon the dis parity between the ages of the parties—expressed the , utmost tenderness and compassion towards the youth of the femilespoke of her absence froth the eye of her mother, and her exposure to a thousand tempta tiong—described the full years of the defendant, his professional obligations, and his contempt of all obli gations professional, moral, and religious, exemplified in the ruin he bad* contrived and completed in this wretched family. The Jury would, by the damages, prove their feeling on this subject ; and they would also declare, whether they thought the conduct of the unhappy mother was free from one of the worst of reproaches—a want of watchfulness over the con duct of her daughter. The Learned Serjeant was proceeding to read a letter from the defendant ad- dressed to the daughter, in which he stated that he wrote to her for the purpose of softening the pain of her situation, urged a variety of excuses for not going into the neighbourhood, and declared that,,under the existing circumstances, he could not fulfil his • promise of marriage to her, which he strongly as sured her was not put off from any improper or sinister motives, when Serjeant VAUGHAN objected to the letter being put in in evidence, as it was decided that no breach of promise of marriage should be put in against a de fendant in a case of seduction. The Loan Cniaw JUSTICI declared the letter con taining evidence of a breach of promise of marriage to be inadmissible, as it might be made the subject Of a separate action. Serjeant Less concluded by a warm appeal to the' feelings of the Jury, in which he called upon them to compensate the mother for the disgrace ind injury she had sustained by the ruin of her daughter, and to punish the defendant for the foul crime which he bad committed. Thomas Cheshunt, the brother of the plaintiff, said that plain ' tiff had been left i widow eight years ago, with three daughters, and one son. Witness received and Maintained one of the•daugh-• ten for the relief of the widow. Sbe removed to Cambridge,. leaving Staiannah and the other children under the tare of their grandfather, andl 1820. Suuznaleis Nov/ bertrecht is and 19 years of age. Witness visited them Oectsibubiter autha'lleen Susannah. assisting in the affairs of the hpuse.• • anew the de fendant, who was at that time assistant to 'Pr. Crisp, and visited 1 the family professionally. First received informndatiiif the preg nancy of Susannah In January, I Mkt , but previenily ts 9 that' tame v,2 be bad certainly observed that Mr. Jenkini paid marked att to her. Upon learning the circumstances ',bleb had Lakes • whims wrote to defendant to come forward and give an e ' Hon pf his conduct and intentions ; and, in limiter, rect. , ' two. *Mrs, appointing interviews, which, however, he did nett keep. After some /Utter correspondence, .def;adent sent a l letter, which was ben pet in sad read.•• It stated is rrrlta . w ishodaot —moult' apinOre Maks his appearance at: ff'. • 404 1 Gibpre the matter, whir* he indentood was to hive been kept secret, had been 410114GP1 IP/ nutlet ()forme; ow of the *is ters • that his hisodiloge ut ntelett•M,• Gath is Ms tutfortenatet ritation, he mikes Wry ausie of marsitai Stwannah, but 'Meld leave tli e =r !/0 4 0 .... o ho %y r .. .. 4 . AragiazA. in. 7, . - r conclusion 19- _ at Moldreib. intiaTiew the meant with to attend bee to bet boßtiPills aloes, Tie names of Cowie; riateltes, andictinitsgtats, were mentioned to her as persons with whom she had hisireper inteiciattle ; she declared ate had only baofis Oasis as *Mars at her asotiber's muse. The plaintirs cake defied here. &leant VALIGUAN addressed Me Jury for the de fendant. He marred them that in the whole course 9f his professional experience he had not met so me lancholy a case-as that before them ; indeed, a man .gnuA he deficient in the common feelings of huma nity who was not harrowed up by the scene that pie seated ltAlf. If all that had beep stated by the un fortunate daughter of the plaintiff were to stand unimpeached, it would be impossible not to consider it the worst of injuries, effected by the blackest of artifices. But he believed there was evidence to prove that the unfortunate girl had committed many of the errors which it was admitted. she had been with the one person guilty of. la fact, he had several to call who would prove that long before her acquaintance with the defendant she had gone astray, and of course the defendant is not chargeable with her ruin. Thomas liawkes, of Meldreth, ten miles from Cambridge, remembered seeing John Course at Mr. 9wynne's house about four or five years since on a particular day, when he went t o meet a friend. lie tried to get in, but he found the door fas tened. lie afterwards went to the window of the kitchen, and saw John Course, and Susannah Sophia Gwynne sitting on his knee with her arms round his neck. Witness added, that he west away from the window, but before he had left the place, he saw John Course quit the house by running away at the back door. Cruss.ezamined by SerjeantLors.—The window of the kitchen looked into the road, from which the pabsengers might see into it. This took place at three o'clock in the afternoon. He never communicated it to any of the family. John Course deposed, that he had known the plaintiff's daugh ter froni her infancy, and was in thelabit of visiting the public house. The daughter was in the habit of calling very frequently at his house to see his sister. He swore that he had had crimi nal intercourse with her three or four years ago, and she was al ways the first to make advances. Ile swore that on the particu lar occasion spoken of by the last witness, he 'vas in the situation described. He had never promised to marry her, nor had she ever asked him such a thing. He could not avoid her, and be continued the connection until he was married himself. Cross-examined by Serjeamt LT:vs.—The interval during which the connection was carried on was about two months. The de feodant was married about a year since, and he now"carries on business at bleldreth. William Course, brother to the last witness, swore that the plaintiff's daughter Susannah used to visit them at their honk., which was about half a mik from the public - house. She used to stay until after dark, and when she was afraid, or said she was afraid, witness Used to accompany her home. On one Sunday evening he called at the public house, when Susannah was abase in the house, and he took with her what liberties he pleased. Cross-examhied.—Perhaps you'll do us the favour to tell us where you have been for the last three years, that you have been 'absent from Meidreth? Witness.—' That question is an unfair one : I won't answer it.' William Pennington swore, that Susannah and he had beets upon the most intimate terms. Serjeant LENS, in his reply, commented with great severity upon the evidence for the defence, and con tended, that there was not the slightest foundation for the charge that the mother had been acquainted with the intercourse that, was going forward between the defendant and her poor child. The letters of the de fendant were sufficient to prove that he could impute nothing to the unfortunate girl in bar of the reparation which was now sought for. The Jury were to weigh the value of testimony. so eagerly given by those who came forward to damn the fame of the victim by an acknowledgment of their own infamy. They were to consider that this abominable disclosure was made, not in terms of regret or compasidn, but in a tone of the most cruel exultation. • TheCutist JUSTICE, in his .charge to the Jury, said that, undoubtedly, if the mother had, in any part of the transaction, consented to the dishonour of her daitlghteri, no action could bi Maintained; but; with out stopping 0-inquire whether the brother did right of wong.in concealing the shame of his sister from their mother . , there was not a shadow of pretence in the 'esvidence that the plaintiff had such knowledge, or had' given suCh Veosent to the tact., In consider ing the action it would be 'asked what Was the situa tion of the defendant? It was that of a medicalman, a. situation.differing from that of every other, for to him every door. was open, and he. was supposed to apProaCh the bedside as a ministering angel! ,No 'door could be shut against such a character—nn one could follow him, for to him the complaint was wfiis tered in the ear, and received in sacred secrecy.— , that such a man should violate the sacred confidence reposed in him, was a crime of the darkest dye; and, said the Learned Jpdge to the Jury, if you do not visit it With the utmost severity, you will :break the solemn trust that is reposed in you r= kor in violating such a trust, what greater injury could. be committed by the defendant, or what could 'be of *Worse consequence? The Learned Judge com mented upon the manner in which the evidence had been given by the poor victim that was fast sinking to the grave that had been prepared for her, and the cause was hurried'on that that event might not take place before exposure and retribution had been visited on her destroyer. Ile contrasted her evidence with that given by the witnesses for the deflect, the grit -loom • had spoken to the intimacy , had, as it were; stood up like a villain on a pa in; in his shame; and the others coming with reluctance or compassion, but with to tell and trhimpit in their own infamy. , he directed the Jury to find such da they thought would be short of die le fi,p. - t h e deeriant.--:The Jury fetutald a the plaintiff—Damages, £:150. 40ifilnita h rrOlt ie . . . ! zeiyeted. ,..* cc . 4 ll 2lta i rlept ialibil asst .i t%=.4lllpy * ' let :107 11111 a` .P a i"lFPart was . sent- •.. , .:: ~ • 'She maid th5t m.4..._..... e115e lied knossis do doesag ant • • i f two _ - The Coloolarande ma went thiohgt COMMllihnodberefla yews. and wee low. . -be bi!it din aeon 1 4.° 111 0 flf!elfrits" gatk° iegaeihned IVldt" . via ts . Alse b "" * te oink • _ sh ft _t_titstreit nowell t , 1 ' ' ihtlittrt "TO Altlittl t . . . h olaga • - 44. am - . allset. WINO This OS WM Moved to be read a seised •• .• •=. r ' lee • , ~,.' ...- J- • .- • ,• : M- TIN Arirt ! erwitit.si. 11,4.4 lh,lbeedd be *it ••• ',‘:i; ' „ ''''' : • - • read a OtoOPa di* 'day sia iistithi. • • ,_ ._„.• .. Mitt . 404116 yea, lILIT4II was astedibii MWI britonnos 1 ° 6 ' tool ' IS( 1411111.4tain oeld Buts lb° °bleat q *Veit mss. to roallo9Me POVF4 I 4. I * f r e ' n 14rinh. 4° - " 4 . 441 bii:olski I to ra. • ilitreatinsot. . . • • • 1 _A l t • ~ . . • Mr. R. M ART ialbontatitedi that havoinlillne boon triitidi ..- 4 - • ilia ira• te e =l4E., with some urbookrby go ! .fietteral, end %het bj would " lli iiiisk •1111 it inalesilittivresit 00%61 illa bo' have given eon* 'ream . j gtoa MI wilds pawed the etiseyveggdhogg7e... as he told her flat, it he ordeal of throe readings last losing .. The whole ottenttf Was in pits tipoOpe .nover Ewa hers bail i e de o .oi. b oy .. . • favour of .this iiiiL •Or Instaared. theses" of 4 wegpsynkos tea tainifirolaid. • bira in Bray lea was tile his knife end wiped out the eye, ot. hie horse bemiallielftred of their banana The defendant etlntimsedlreVll: with Mtn. 'lfe•considered the opposers of this illaialgiot abet- ale/ • . • tort of croaky The nil dolt mild that a aset‘for tan "Most Tits an her ctessweeiminatios by Serino' Vet:Gnaw, barbirity to his eludes should be imprisoned three menthes or no*** slidre,llfit she lever had itsbnacy . wlth any min be - - pay aloe of X& Esse the defendant... Her Minter derprised then on tie Met cic- Mr. Aidetosan WOOD was loaned to support the Bill• of otitis., 'Vi e s was lest isferlsed.o the defendant desired necessary.--Mr. HOLFOILD appeal' the MIL it .hi' .a secret howler, aod'she deo begged her I"' Mr. c , *YIOI too/ the tame : Clookl to animals_, . lei' ' it. It was not Hit after her pregnancy that wso certainly a crime, hot cwt to be . brittle.. -.. Mona bremadier win &fanned of it. ' The defendant Continued to rather a submit for oh! Pulpit_ thee tie Basch; v i s i t Ur with the keno:ledge enter brother, bit was net Mowed • Mr' C. w 4 "I" brat braretier of legislating on Ms mbieett to &nand Ise, le lier hrirairm .1.. a. .Ps. ...- -e et- . 95.16 4, =:417.4 rw• .- - ncluslon, be dist btstileld tee sao. wore seen Meildretts. Wltness . o4.4, time be had w ore o b ta i ne d an of whom who arview with ttio defenelant, at which the lattcr'declareed that they saw, as it e affair was a se* todoctitaasa ona,. „hut that be' certainly forward, R im !11 rant to marry bi's Tee li.waledi xonatinsl:de_wf thLint"" forward, not w arm had bees carded oat fbere wi*. s . ll * (lol 4 h for •WA d I doh r.filtwated diet foc pie m t s it st kept a s e sFle t. iet as possible. Wiens ftuantat .to late been a In conclusion, st strictly Timsaes girl before her lutorralak arkle dedlidaut. mages As they s l . l solub Own" tb* anffier t9 44 l lloPMltl i P Jo* rein ,Of ti l xy , as Alp AratAkovilit taw ►verdict for thl quit; matt .1 .1 t • . . v; I tz; ~1 , I