Star. — London, England, 1803-03-02 00:00:00

Pr r,HE WARDEN .1%.13 MINOR CANONS OF ST. PAUL'S '. MORRIS AND OTHERS. This important cattle was farther proceeded on to ila). 'h. ATTORNET•CENFRALs Mr. RR:masers, and Mr. 8 rasLEY, difplayed great learning and ties in hewing cattle againll a motion for a third trial ; and Mr. NIANSFIELD and Mr. ILEAC!! in firTiorting the motion. The LORD CH A mcLt.I.OR, .both in the entitle of leer at giiment, and at the conclufion of it, made a 01 trill important oblervatious on the to ) hi apprehenflon, ought to be ca. .1 :knit his conlideration, and alto on the it would be his duty to excreifi. rii: ; ;r .spun. His Lordlllip flood Oleic icflions with ~4 t :at perfpicuity, and laid he was not then piepared to deliver his judgment upon them but if this v.-as to go to a third trial, the parties thuuld nit be delayed ; and another con sideration would be, what was to be done in mat ter of ;colts. COURT OF RING's BENCH, MARCH I. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. LREDS V. COOKE AND ANOTHER. This was an action of trefpafs on the cafe againll James Cooke and Elizabeth, his wife. The de claration timed that the laid Elizabeth, before her marriage with the raid James, had promifed to marry the plaintilf, which promife the had broken to the damage of the plaintiff of gcool. Mr. EasitiNE olderved that he was Counfel for Mr. Leeds, a gentleman in a refpeaable fitaation life, who, before the death of his father, had formed an attachment that promifed him the reateft felicity, but which had produced nothing tut difappointment and mifery. The object of his affection was the daughter of a Mr. Cat dinal, a gentleman t f coallderable landed elate in the county of Efftx. Me paid his addrelTes to her, and bad no reafon to complain of the reception he met with. The young lady herfelf confented to be come his wife, and their union was fan/Honed by the approbation of the pa,rents on both fides.— This was not a light and incontiderate engagement entered into in a moment of paffion or thought. lefsnefs. Such an engagement was not to be held fo very !acted—it might be infringed without any very great inconvenience, and without a deep wound to the feelings. Here nothing but the ce remony was wanting to join them inditTolubly.— A fettlement had been executed, whereby aoool. advanced on his part, and the like Cum on hers, were limited to the tile of themfclves and the Ate of the marriage. The ring was bought, and the fo'eninity was only delayed by an accident. Old Mr. Cardinal, who parted with his money molt relnetantly, withed Midfummer to be over, that he might receive the dividends upon his flock before he bid for ever adieu. The molt ferious conic quences followed. Before the day fo anzioufly expelled came round, a gay and gallant failor flepped on time, and captivatei. the heart of Mifs Cardinal. This was Mr. Cooke, who, with a full knowledge that the lady was engaged to another, knowing that the had figned her marriage !mic a:tent, had the indelicacy and injuftice to think of her for himfelf. His arts were but too fuccefsful, and the eloped with him for Gretna Green. It had been whifpered that an attempt was to be made to impute what had happened to the ill condo& of the Plaintiff. But the evidence of the lady herfelf would repel this infamous Bander, and (hew that the could affign no reafon for her breach of faith but her own caprice and volatility. Soon after her return from Scotland the wrote the plain tiff the following letter : Sit—Since my departure from my father's hook I have felt very weedy in nos having apologized to you for my improper aoudad. I am genfible I have injured you In Dot perasenana the prontife I came under, be which was given without confi dent,: what I was doing, or attending to the winfequenees of fads an angeipentent. 1 am well allured that the ill treatment you hats received from melt not to be ceded. I confect that you always behaved to me we land that you &terve one more worthy of your favours. and whit May make you harrier than It was ever in my power to do. I never could fumnson up re &dation to give you a flat denial, though I Imagined you never could contra upon re that biplanes I enjoy In the Gentleman wl.ll whom I eloped. I acknowledge that your views were to nnurable, and that your offer was advantageous—but there was af.:retisuireGisg, which forbade met • hope I fb.auld ever feel that love for you which ought to exift between two perfons to be joined in the marriage tie. Front my knowledge of your good princip'es. I titiag you will pardon say indifcretian, and pity my wealniefe. With the ladling of Goo may you be apyy lor ma c y years, and united with an amiable and v i r t uou s woman—may you enjoy every plcafure that this life aff o rd i o— TM. prays yoar Gocere intud and cdolged humble fcrvants ELM. COOKS. Mr. En sit IN 1 , allowed, that if a young girl had entered into an improvident engagement, the mutt be permitted to recede front it. But was this let ter a full apology for having jilted a man after a two years' courtihip, and thus rendered him ridi culous to his acquaintance and to all the world I This pie-thine might be urged by every one w . bo tidied to take t ne..v lover. Why had the not e;ifeovered "firivt.6,nehing" ',elute the appearance of Mr. Cock:: .' Atter reading a letter, which we Bull innoduce in th- fequel, he raid he ci4.l not pretend that tl..s injui y was as great to a mar. as to a female. Th: former did not littler the fame tlifparagement, nor could his fenfitnliiy be fuppoted to be fo cruelly outraged. He was not' trillruCed to fay that Mr. I.et:J.4 was pining for grief, or that he had deteriniaed to 1.:v.7 But he had Coffered a IcTis. which lie was entitkd to a recompenm being t:ifappointed and espied. 'he I;ad parted with ties property. The old Fnticman refuted to reconvey, unleta the Plaintill thottld bear all the e :pence of the fettlement. But an appeal WAS now roade to men of jostler ptincipl-c a•la more lateral fentiments, who would no: 1.11 to grant ample rulrefs. Mr. Thofll2l s the att-o-rity. fa: d, that applica -6'll was made to hir.a about the t . ..tlernent ea the vienning of tBcr. It was at firti pr• - •iii.fed that 7ocnt. fhoi.ld Le advanced I.n each fide, h it 40 , 7,01. as r ile fit',' it; nn. Old Mr. CAT:I:n.II, 11;1 1'1..1.1 • , , and ::.;-ne to to • rd. old gentleman Veined to have the mat rhtge defer. red till after Midfummer, which difplcafed the Plaintiff. Mils C. being preffed for an early day, gave her confcnt, and the Plaintiff entering into an undertaking not to claim the Midfummer divi dends, the old gentleman waved his objettion.— Oa the afternoon of that day they returned, and (hewed the witnefs the licence and the ring. The lady raid fie fluarld like to be married in London, but he told her that, natwithilanding the licence, one of the parties muff have rcfided tour weeks in the parifb v here the ceremony was to take place. Ile had not fume drawn a letticment between the Plaintiff and Mifs Turpin. The hand wi iting of the letters being proved, they were then read, and this was the Plaintiff's cal:. It was admitted that Mils Cardinal eloped with Mr. Cooke on the 9th May, and that they were afterwards married tor ether. Mr. Ga avow, an the part of the Defendant, raid, he did not difpute that they were married. The queftions for the Jury to confider were, What da. mages the Plaintiff was entitled to expeCt, and what, under all the circumflances which had ap peared, and which would appear, the Defendant ought to pay ? It had been rightly conceded that a breach of promife of this nature was not fuch an aggravated injury to a man as to a female.— j Certainly there could he no foundation for Paying' that the peace of mind of this Plaintiff seas ruined, and that his hopes of happinefs were blabbed. No weeping willow would be biurthened with his car cafe, and if lie hanged himfell it would be rotund the neck of Ififs Turpin. Ile fhould prove that Mr. Leeds was the latt man who fhould have pre rented himfelf in a Court of Juftice with fuch a complaint. Damages would have fent the De fendant to gaol. His father had left all his pro perty to a trullee to be fold, and the money wiling from the Isle to he veiled in the funds. The truf tee complied with the fir direCtion of the will, but negleited the fecond, for the whole of the mo ney arifing from the fate he had appropriated to his own Me. Much had been raid about his gal lantry : but this hero who Itepped on fhore cover ed with glory to dazzle the eyes of a lady was on ly the puller of an extra Indiaman, who, having loft his all, was obliged to viftt foreign - climes for a fubfiftence. Mr. Leeds was faid to be all impa tience to poffefs this woman; but with him all women were the fame. It would appear that on the very night when the rettlement Wit executed ' he behaved in a manner the moll contrary to Flo. rality and delicacy. He was guilty of milconduCt which no man could have been betrayed into who was on t'he eve of being married to a woman whom he loved, and who looked forward to the happinefs of being father. It was the three per cents. that he was impatient to polfefs, and riot Mifs Cardinal. He would difhonour the gown he wore by fuppofing that an apology would be made for fuch delperate, abandoned profligacy. It ad mitted of no palliation, and would excite univerfal abhorrence. Perhaps it would be Axed, WAY this known to Mils Ca:dinal ? Was this the ground on which (he broke off the match ? He anfwered— No ! But that did not affea the meafure of the da. mages. Who complained ? A man who, from figning the deeds that feeured him what he pre tended fo earneftly to with, retired to a brothel.— The turn of money awarded by the Jury would not go to a public charity—it was not a line upon this lady for her inconnancy. It was to go into the pocket of the Plaintiff as a compenfatton to him for his ditipprintment, which mutt have been In ft were, from the tender attachment lie (hewed for his future wit:, and his anxiety for the welfare of his polterity ! if a nonfuit did not take place, the turn the Jury awarded would be infamy, not damages. He had even behaved to Mifs Cardinal in her prefence, with the utmoft cruelty and bar barity. As loon as the fettlemcnt was executed, he thought that all was fate. Immediately after he would be found ufing the following language : " Now, Madam, recollea that you have no will of your own ; my will mull henceforth be your rule." They were taking an escitrfion together, and the lady laid (he chafe to walk. " No, (laid he) I chute that you (hall ride ; fo is my will and pleature ; I will break your bones if you refute." In proper feafon, he intimated that he would flog her : her anfwer was, " I am not married i yet, when I am. you may perhaps do I Many grave difputes had taken place with „ re gard to the thicknefs of the thumb flick with i which the law of England allows a man to cot.. reel his wife. But Mr. Leeds was determined that there fhould be a precedent to which, in all their lubfequent quarrels, they might refer. He ex claimed, " I will th ew you before hand what you have to expea," and threw a herfe whip at her with violence and paftion. In fuch a form any port was ddirable. She doped with the Putter. It was only filial duty that prevailed upon her to liften to the plaintiff's addreffes. The match be tween the fathers, to fay the truth, was only a matter of three per cents. what he would not call, in the vulgar phrafe, a Smithfield bargain. She made a fair trial of his temper and principles ; but a regard for the peace of her future life re quired that the Humid go no further. On another occafionwhiljhey were in London,the young lady went to pay a vifit to a friend. On her Teflon the door of the honk wasftiutagainft lier,and the Plain tiff laid Ihelliouldnot cuter. Whenhe returnedtothe country he gave proofs, if poftible, of ail' greater profligacy. Mr. Garrow then gave an account of his fohciting the chaff y of the wife of one of Mr. Careht.al's krvants, and put it to the Jury, Whe ther, if a man courting a daughter of theirs were to behave in this manner, they would not inwne• diatel dilmjfs him with ignominy ! He afterwards went on to the letters. He faid he was glad that two had been produced. It was evident that the fiat had bent tranfcribed from a copy, evidently . indited by another perfon, who, he believed, was Mr M'Leod, who thus hoped to makepeace bet ween the two families. it could not be at all confidered as (peaking her fentiments. What became of all her elegance, cerreanefs, and proper fpelling, when the fat down to write without aftittancc ? Her feeond letter was as follows : • '•• the Ring to !ate this opp:rtunity to var :Lc camas over to toy fathas to-suorrow morn in, and 1 DWI be at Wheatley Crofs at ten, where 1 willsl r to tell you the reafon of my vie:peeled departure. as I nev,r meant to aft dilbonoras4 to you, which "nukes me • ry ekly " Yotiihuniblefehiant, " CLIZAICT:I C. It 'MAL.. Mr. Gmtkow concluded a very able fpeech, by admonifhing the Jury to confider the value the plaintiff had let upon this lady, together with the grief he felt upon lofing her, and to deal out da mages accordingly. Lydia Burnby, a maid fervant of Mr. Cardinal's, laid that (he had heard Mr. Leeds declare to Mil., C. that he would flea her alive, and that he would break every bone in her Hein. He added, that be would murder bee if he were married to her. Milb C. anfwered,' we are not married yet.' She is n ot lure whether this was before or after the execution of the fettlement. . ..... Mr. John Cardinal, the brother, confirmed this evidence, and name that the quarrel took place after they had returned from London. He added other Wks of the fame kind. James Hart, Mr. C.'s carman fworn. Gave an account of his throwing the whip at her with kern ing pillion, but did not overhear what was faid. After the elopement, the plaintiff declared he was glad the was gone, it was a good riddance of bad rubbifh. Two or three days after he gave witnefs a letter to Mifs Turpin, and faid if the would come to his propofals, he would fettle upon her the in tereff of aoocl. Witnefs carried the letter to Mifs Turpin, who could not make it out, and applied to him to read it for her. He brought back a mcf rage, defiring the plaintiff to go to her the next day. He went accordingly. Sarah Hart, the wife of the laft witnefs, de fcribed how the plaintiff made her a prefent of a quarter of a pound of tea, with a view to bring her to his criminal purpofes. When the defired him to go to Mifs C. to whom he was to be married, he exclaimed,' d—n Mifs Cardinal—the is nothing to me.' This was between the acth of April and 9th of May. Mr. Cardinal, the father, fail that after the plaintiff's father'sdeath he came to his houfe, where he remained two years. He fwore that as they were returning from Mr. Thomas's, the attorney, to the Blue Boar, Whitechapcl, the plaintiff went off with a wanderer in Fleet-ltreet, and that when he met him, about two hours afterwards, he con- Idled that he had been home with her to her lodg ings in Milk-ftreet. He related this anecdote to his daughter when he got home. When the went off he asked him to go after her. His anfwer was, 4to oblige you I will; but for my own fake I will not (lir a Itep.' Mils Turpin was next called. She received a letter from the plaintiff in May laft ; all the recoi led* of it is, that the plaintiff laid he would din: with her the next day. He came. CZ What pi u• polal did he then make to you ? A. He offered himfelf as a (tutor; but I refufed him. Q Was there any fettlement propofed ? A. No : I did. not choofe to keep him company. Q When did he come to lodge with you ? A. He remained a week at Mr. Cardinal's, and be has lived with u► ever ante. Lord acaddooon then examined her.—Q Did he not make propofals of marriage to you ? A. No. Q Did he offer himfelf as a fititor ? A. Yes. CZ You don't mean to fay that he addreffed you with dithonourable views ? A. No, my Lord. Qyas there no word ofmarriage ? A. No,m y Lord. Q . ._Did be addrefs you as a wife or a miftrefs ? A. As a wife. Q . Did he not offer you marriage then ? A. Not the right away. (I._ Yon mean to fay that he did not fay he would marry you imme diately ? A. Juft fo, my Lord. (Mifs T. is very beautiful, and was not by any means fo much cm ' barreled as might have been ezpe&ed.) Mr. ERSICItia made a moft eloquent reply. He gave up his client to infamy if this evidence was true ; but he contended that a low, vulgar, ftupid, abominable confpiracy bad been entered into to deftroy his reputation. He took up the witneffes feparately, and made many ftrong obfervations upon their teftimony. He was particularly fevere upon the old gentleman, whom he pronounced equally infamous, whether what lie (wore was true or falfe. To allow a man to continue his addreffes to his daughter, in whom he had witneffed Inch brutal conduit, was nut inferior in criminality to the guilt of perjury. Lord Eccseadoucit laid, that though the hufband and wife were joined in this aetion for a breach of promife of marriage ; it was to the wife exclutively the Jury were to look, the kutband be ing joined only bccaufe fhe ceafed to have any feparate property, and all the damages muff come out of his pocket. As the breach of promife was admitted, there were only two queftions to be con fidered—t. Whether it took place under circum (lances that rendered it venial ? and 2. If it did not, to what furn was the plaintiff entitled as a compenfation for the injury he had fifflained ? This fpecies of caufes were capable of more fhades and gradations than almoft any other. The dif appointment might occalion fo much mifery even to a man that he had a fair right to complain of it in a Court of _Wake. But before it waa fup poled that the feelings of a party were wounded, it was neceffary to enquire whether that party had any feelings. If he remained indifferent, much more if he esprelfed joy, the moil minute damag es could not be too ( mall for him. I think, laid t his Lordflaip, the brutal condo& of the plaintiff to wards the Lady has been fuiliciently proved. If on that the had relied her defence, the law would have borne her out. A woman is not to commit her happinefs to a man that threatens to flea her and to break her bones. If the has come under an engagement, by fuch language the is releafed from it. But a fufficient ground is not Rated in the letters, and to them we mitt look. They were written at a time when it was important for her to urge every thing that the could in her jufti fi cation. It may be proper that a woman fhould break off a match with a man for whom the can feel no af ration, but the law does not fandion this Rep.— ' She may aft with prudence in difmiffing him, but the mutt abide by all the legal confequences of this breach of her promife. She is bible to oom penfate in damages to the man for the injury (he i has occafiohed to him. Bad condo& on his part can alone exotic her. There is wig ueflionably a great difference between the letters, in lc/A:aunts, language am ten out by al have been w , Jaferettit Cur pin, an pofat of im after the Cl() the teltimoin of t 1:: plainti by her letter ha - power, the uue con; ijaisiotpt ri..;,eas a Cardinal is to be a fordi di% idetids th mutt Itiange h a ve in this of the iettlei confcilion to evidence an( be one of th what is alms probable em tlemcn, I am plaintiff; but whether he is entitled to mote than nominal damages, it is for you to confider. The Jury, atter confulting together a few mi nutes, returned a verdia for the plaintiff—Da mages One Shilling !I ISHMAEL V. CLANK! AND ANCliliEll. The plaintiff is a flopfeller, and a jew ; he was going to Gofport, and took a place in a Rage coach, of which the defendants are proprietors, and en the way it broke down, in confequence of which he was hurt, and brought this anion to re cover a compenfation. The defence was, that it was matter of pure accident. After a number of witneifes were examined on both fides, the cafe was left to the Jury to fay whe ther it was the effea of accident or not? Lord ELLFN.BOROUGII laid, the proprietors of Rage-coaches were bound to be careful and atten tive to infped and examine their coaches, at fre quent intervals, lel' any accident fhould happen. He fail, as common carriers, there was not any queflion whatever, but that they were anfwerable for all accidents happening to goods, with which they were entrufled, the aift of Con and the King's enemies excepted. He did not fee, upon any prin ciple of reafon, why the lives and limbs of his Majefiv's lubjeets Ihould have a sower degree of protefion and infurance. However, he was not aware of any cafe that had been determined to that extent. Verdiq for plaintiff, damages 351. nct fettling. But firs, though err ';- another perloo, pion . he f il pp e r ed t i written from her iintroetions: . I cania). evidence for the defendant. M a tt unwilling witnels, proves that a pro- larriagt was n:ade to her three cltyi opcmcnt, and thus veldts coedit upori of Hart. What then are we to think 'tiff's condui t ? Though the is eltopped ors to plead the excine that was you mull look to hint before you hz iipeulati.ln. He loitered no misery.__ nevented It om looking forward to mar_ source of comfort. The evidence of extraordinat y. He does, indeed, feern lid old man, more careful about his' han the happinefs n: his . child. It teems ;e: that the piAintiti ihould not only manner on the of the execution :trent, but that he amid,' make a tuil o Ins future father-inlaw. But ionic . id exhibics we have had, Thew this to he coarielt families in the kingdom.and nod impollible in another cafe, may be tough in this. Upon the whole, Uen- ot opinion that you mull find for the L 41V INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CtIANCLRY, MARCH I. PCCLF:,IAS I'ICA L PRO varioNs. 01TORD. Fr e. 16 --Thurfday toe T7th Mit Samuel Elisial4 of Lincoln College, way admitted Bachelor of Arts. - Saturday Lilt, the R. Thomas Vaughan, Bachelor otArts. of ;elm was adn:i•ted Ma ltr of Arts. l'ucfday Rev. Edward BLrtlca James, Bachelor of Arta. of N:is •dairn College. WT.S admi.tel Mager of Arta Metro_ J ph Pratt Pruti, Richard ;coney, mad William arse., A. i.ecter Colicze ; Genrze Bigze, and Beer? Frederic Thifleth-• wayte, of Qr en', College, were admitted Bachelors of Arta Yeilerdar Mr. John Hawke* Moles, of St. Mary Halt, was admitted Eschetor of .rts. BIRTHS. On Sunday morning, the Lady ut Comet Diary of OMla how, near Levi., of a drnshter. Saturday fennight, Mr 3. Lavrrenfon,of Inverigitty, of a fat At Pkoderleith, on Sanday Walden, Mts. Lafrag, of a daughter. At Cawnpore, !aft ladles, as the 16th Aug*,s tank Mrs. Colonel Pringie, of a daughter. MARRIED. Lad week, 'William Turner, Efq. of Leeson, in the meaty of Effie, to Mile Carriniten. On the a zit of Jane latt, at Berman, in the Ealllodies, Thee. Hinter, Efq. (fon of Mr. Wade= Hunter, We of Becetea), to Lady Nano& Penmen, an ►eirefa la potegaa of mama Dlk D. On the 27tit of February, after a lent and pandel 1114nis, at the age of 28, at the busk of Sr Wm. , Bart m Wey mouth, Mrs. Wood. wife of John M. Wood, dors% rot the Rev. Edward Dane, of S'arrwfbury, and lases teLadillii. saird. and Sir Wm. Puhener. Bat. HIGH WA ITR AT LONDON BRIDGE Tamoaaoi Morning • • •• •• • 7 minutes after tt• Afternoon TO THOMAS TAYLOR LK, Dtme sit. N. 9, Beldge-itsvet, Lade& jFEEL it a duty incumbent upon me, to inform you attic very great and extraordinary Vert I have received from your invaluab . .e Medleine.-.LEaUItiP9 PATENT PU.LIIL About two years ago I was attacked with a V DIP ORD rR, which I treated rather Rightly for fame time, but thit Difeafe at kng'h fpreading all over my Body, I was obliged to apply to the molt eminent of the Faculty, but their allftanise afforded only temporary reild-1 went through various Omits of Salivation, and from being rattier of .a corpulent Habit was reduced to a mere Skeleton. The Ulcers that trend all ever my limbs, rendered me a complete Oiled. fo that my Mena defpaired of my recovery. When brought to this titiollos, tochdered death as inevitable, but a relation of nine canasta. ing upon flu: many Cal's' in which your Pills had fueceatkd, was induced to try a boa of them, which I thought rather re lieved me, and by perfevcrance for two or three months, and 1,11 owing your Direetion,,, I experienced the molt onsalitilits• We Relaxatioii from Pain, the Sores gradually frbfiangx I am now, thank Goo, pivfe.lUy rceov.ved, and walking out daily & I doubt not hot one more boa, which I think cautious to take, will citablim my health in its original Rate. It is with tie molt t ! main udc that I rubtcribe myfelf, dr, your much Alta humbk fcrvaut, Wit. Pliaso n. I)m.liote, Manchelter, July t, aor. P. S. 11 ., ,r the public benefit I do not objedt to robe above be ing publifhed, but leave you to act u your own better judg• meat (ball .10ate. Prepared and Sold by the Sole Proprietor, Taos. Tar Lo•, Member bf the Royal Cohere of Surgeons, London, at ho Houk No. 9, Newaridgc-Rrcet: Where, of to a cort 3 4•ll refidence of more than till:iv-11z years, in a pradice particular!? directed to the Cure of Venereal Complaints, with that ineicls hle lea ccy which men of his Profefhun fhould always °Herres he ilatt4r4 Innifelf. the advice and alEttance be gratuitoufly ad miniftcrs to perfuns taking this Medicine, will be cltecmed, by a kerning Public, as au advantage Wow tube obtilbsed, and void of aml.Euity. Alfo 41, by 144 Appointment, for the convenience of abets living at a alit' att.?, at the Perfumer's, No. ;it St. Alban's- It rect Pall- NIall; the Toy-Stop, No. tot, Oxford-and ; Mr, Difborough's, No. ;, ; Mr. Steel's, Dookrelier. No. 1, Unitm-Row, lower Hill; Mr. Wader's. South' brid. , e, Edinburgh; Mr. CalarclEs, Dublin; Mr. IBillage's4 Liverpool; Mr. Atkinfon*4. hianchelter ; and by one Pato& in every confid,rable Town in Great-Britain and Ireland, is Boxes of only as. 94. each, failed up with full and plain Dim dont, whereby Perron s of either Set may Cure theinkhas with Eafe. Speed, Secrecy, and Safety. LONDON: Pnnted r, r'hi. Propneeura, by joHNDANI L (of Nldden-lane, Cs:mem-Dudes) at the. STA{ Passirm a- Orr Ica. Carry-11ml ; and pubbarad by LEVEL KEN*I oaf Canterbury llacc,Lambethj at Wo.t.Catey-fi ma i and at the :•I am-Orrice. emple-Bar ; toytacit O. e " cot= catkwas Carats Pr! rua atc refiettad gybe adertgai