Star. — London, England, 1803-07-06 00:00:00

-~= yobability. the total lofts of that cohntry to Great tritain-- About this part of she Noble Earl's fpeeeh, %The Loan Csiaacactot role, he faid, to (pe to queftion of Order. He hoped t h e N o bl e E ar l w ctife him for the interruption, as he could afurst . m, that what he was about to fubmit to the Haute s no way connected with any part of the Noble rl's fpeech. The eircomftance to which he meant b call their Lordfhips' attention was one which, for he Slit time, was communicated to him on that day; t was, that peribiu were then below the Bar of that . goufe, taking notes of their Lordfhips ' proceedings. e waited to Make it known, that if a praCtice fo di- Wily contrary to the Standing Orders of the Houfe, was purfued, he voted move to have the Houfe Peared of all ftrnnger!, and then he would call their Lordfhips to decide, whether that praltice was to be ermitted or not ? His Lordthip at the fame time Viking and pointing towards the Bar, obferved, that It pertain to whom he alluded were not unknown ;a him. (Them waowne Gentleman at this time, and evfy sae, taking totes of ttc Earl of Sadolles fpe:ch: sod when the Other of the itnck Rod dented him to withdraw from the Houk. he retitled to is In, and perhited in thin notes. 'lb e Mho iif the Black Rod then communicated this eirconattanee to the Chaileellor • and that Probably gave rife to the nbfervsti ns made by his I .ortifhin. We lid not oblerve that this Gentleman afterwards continued to take tugs ] The Eatl of Surrota refumed his fpeech : He lid, there was another material point which his Ma• iefty's Miniaers ought to attend to, and that was, in :ncreare the cavalry : it war a force which would be if the utsnott importance in cafe the enemy made a landing. It could all in every field into which the enemy mig ht eaters and filch was the nature of this poontry, t tat loch entrance would be attended with sretultr• as almoll every field was (urrounded by a VIM of fortification. It was alfo extremely necelary Int the foldiers 6004 be continually firing at marks. rons a falfe rpecies of crconenny, the folduers, daring the tall war, were never fopplied with a (efficiency of unpowder. As a military mat. he would fay, that (oldies ought to he allowed a profulion of it, in order that they might be continually firing. His Lordfltip then entered into feveral military details, wi:h regard to the difeipline of foldiers: and then lamented that the fpirit of the country did not appear to be fuffici ently alive to a dale of its dangers, or fulficiently roofed to repel them ; and for that reafon it was in. aumbent on every Member of that Houle, and on revery Gentleman of landed property, to go to his Plumy, and, by his example and his ,admonition, eobrsA up the fpirit of his tenants and neighbours, onsi pant out to them the neceffity of coming forward in 'defence of the Ration at large. Let the people 4usiew *hat they mud expelt from a fuceefsful inva-' firm ott iNe part of France ; let the miferies of 1101- • rid, SWltzerland, and other Countries on the Con ' which France had conquered and pillaged, be ied nut; and ii the faMe time let the people of be 'Olds, thee, was no country on earth - ethieh'reriace entertained fo great an animo 4aT4 .fi s tide i, Intl that no country would differ more in ca& of .assiavafion. His Lordihip concluded with olsUreing, that he could not let the prefent Bill,pafs i witlunir makisig thofe obfereations, and throwing out thole hints to. Minifters. Lord D,rent.ex eepreffed his approbation of the prefent Bill; and took notice of a Ratement made ea a forme/ dap, by Lord Moira, with regardto the great deficiency of oar regular regiments as to the number of men which they contained. He was lorry to'hearfrom filch high authority .a Ratement fo nn qualified; one to which the Noble Lord had not even In ade any exception, and which would be likely to elqgmat mifchief in the country. /t was with dill more concern, as well as with indignation, he had beard of ezpreffions-in another place, that tended to Throw a damp and . a defpoodency over the public mind. It bad been raid, that the capture of London ' would decide the fate of theconntry. • It would not. If London was pillaged, if the public funds were cle aroyed, the enemy would dill be refilled and con ' quered, and theconatrY would 11111 be faced. • The Bill war then read a third time, and pallid. The' Scotch Army of Referee Bill was alto read a I third time, and pat/ed.—Adjourned. HOUSE OP COMMONS. The User of the ILO Rod futranotted the Hetet to attend In thel - loofe of Peers, to hear his Majidbes Royal Commilkon read; mid no big Mora The Swami bdwined the Heefe, that the Royal Mart was figniled by sonimillon to the Additional Entre Duty Bill and to kirtl a trisste Bills. Atria Additional Bounty Bill was brought io, read • Lilt time, mil witted to be rood • (wood time to-morrow. imots• Divorce WI treat through a Cornmittot, in which Cows fel were Mod. and the 'croft wits bcesest op. TRAWL - - Get Sral Oaacaroa gars MINOS, that he ihessid OR Monday *lt Arreg, that a Cemedttoe be appointed to latpdre into the Rate of the Tads debt Corskty, *we mall of the Export Trade. He gave this kag sake been& he wee anti** that Milliner% might have on spy malty a( originating the nteatare if they had atm inteatinn aro doing. the CAA Ncituni of tbe Exegete r a *hawed. that k was in the'contetapkthan d GOVOIWISIK to bring fonntrd fans aseaCure a that had as boa as k woe eenvenietnt *die hoped that ao lion. Gentleman *said yen it forward too Soon. General Gannets' hid, that 11 Maskers were eillionted to ►ring forward the trantioa at ea early period. he Isaald wiWtagll withdraw !drawl*. The Cleasseeauta of the racemes' replied, that Minlaces. would bartgehted by eitesuiftanese as to the time at which they Artald ptaptdo the awake. I sad he mead that it would sot be neatestq to ►ring it formed this Seam 'hewn' Gower sta thee 'Vented. that be welted the Ileufe to uneisetand that be perieverid In giving Rothe of his inteadal roe %OM whit h he alme Id !wing forward as Maltby. Mr. Rosa brought in the ail far akettsitneg the number of the Pone to each Pariah. sad the annemet of the F.speuces ul Catir sri-ORtilarte —Reed a IR tiros, ordered to he real a testiest taw row, sad to oe reitorel. 14 , 1 D'•C[ SILL. tie the motile fa bringing u' the R epees Glib, 6311 ladle necks BI . eons cumin star; and wbso the Dill woe Woven op. se ls al ni.de, on ' , be tumid' of if William Primacy. by whit& ounces/ anweg 11.1stoiper. see to he Mini up . y the Preftietors .t lag*. and not by the Lea Will Compaq, as 'Ally mottled In the Mr. CALCIIIIVT propot:4 a claire ke ezetogelog Dip which hor..b bat at Leas itioth. Woes the Duties; ass! on this clsab tie finale prosaaled to divide; Rat it was at 411 asiativoil with erg • divihi.a. lo ken itrzoes-n were re-slissitWd into the gawp. it Cooed Mr. AL:enlist:l Comae no his legs objeaiag to the tro•tion nt Ilse Chancellor of the Exchequer, that the 11 u e d • nor rein've itMl - into a Committee on the for int pr. 11;•,; a 'rah landed and Funded Pro I.- etc. W•irill Alder:own imaginesl this to be • 1...• prop t ica for urging his i.hjetitions to the '.--; IIR i•l•jeti • :is chicl4 ;ay ogainil the principle of tht Hit:, sad thcie objea:c is be was &Tared to Ursa its compliance with the opininn and inftrudlii,ns ofltis conilituents. Indeed no modification could amend the Bill in his or their eyes: at long as they 1 perfilled in thinking that the Bill Inuit in irs opera tion prove unjitit, partial. vexatious. and unconfti-. tntional. Indeed they held it in the Cime Bat as the Tax upon Income, Which was repealed id the cootie - of the laft Seam. The Lotto MAYOR of London raid that he was as anxious as his Worthy Colleague could be to attend to the local interefts of his constituents t but when once he was returned a Member of that Houfe. he felt it to be his fiat duty to confute his•own confcience and to attend to the general interefts of the Empire at large, which he then reprefented, as well as to the particular interests of his nnmediate eonflituents.— He had indeed delivered an opinion unfavourable to the late Income Tax ; but he might fill be found not incoofiftent is giving his rapport to the prefent meafure ; for in many refpefts it appeared to him materially to differ from that tax. At all events he thould unnetually and findinuily attend to the pro gra* of the Bill, and ufe his bell endeavours fo to amend it as to render it as unobjeCtionable as poffible to his constituents and to the people at large. Some Tax, equally produetive, was abtolutely necefary under the Rehm' circumftances of the country. Mr. Alderman ANDIR SON was of the fame 'opinion. Colonel BASTARD laid, he did not mean to impale the Speaker'► leaving the chair, but bearded to'knosv how far the Bill was intended to affect landed pro perty ? The Cita/ICI/Lima of the Exc los is raid, that lie did not conceive. if the answer he thould give to the Honourable Gentleman who (poke la@ (hould be un favourable to his opinion, that be fhould therefore oppofe the Speaker's leaving the chair. If he un derftood the queftion of the Honourable Gentlediaa, it was thiot- " Whether, under any, circurn ft ances, landed property can be charged mote than 5 per cent." In all en-cumftances where the owner of land lets it out, only 5 per cent. is payable, that is, ts. in the pound. Where the owner of land holds the fame in his own hands, and is, in fee, hit own te nant, then he is to pay is. 9d. that is, is. as landlord and 9d. as tenant. He then adverted to what bad been raid by Mr. Alderman Comhe. It was not for him, he fail, to comment on what had fallen from the Worthy Alderman relative to following the in firalions of his conitituents, hut he could not but fee with pleafure the galore of the Right Honoura ble Gentleman in the chair (the Speaker). etpreffive of his furprife at hearing filch a doetrite. ' He fully coincided in opinion with the Right Hon. Gentleman behind him, the worthy Chief Magistrate of the City of London, that, when returned to that Houfe, every individual Member fat then as the reprefentative Of the whole country ; and it was the particular and bounden duty of every one, while fitting there, to attend so and watch over the general iaterefts of the whole community. The Hon. Alderman (Ccmbe) had raid, that this was neither more nor lets than the old Income Tax revived. This he denied to be the cafe. In raying this, he did not mean to infinuate any thing agaialt the old tax, for it was one he had al ways highly approved; and whets he food forward for its repeal. he had decidedly delivered his opinion , in favour of the principle of the tax, and that it was what ought to be tilted upon again, if future circum ftances thouldarife to require it. The difference be tween that, meafure and this is, the psvfent tax is to be applied to the fame put - poles. and hinges on the fame principle as the other, but the mode of collating it was better, becaufe it was calculated• to avoid any difclofure of the circumftances or property of she parties paying the tax. By the mode of charging land and money at intereft. no difclofure whatever took place. In a commercial country it was unquef tionably moll detirable. that no difclofure of circum (lances thould be made, further than was abfolutely neceffary to fecure the payment of the tax, and a plan would (portly be fubmitted to Parliament on this head, which he hoped would meet with general ap probation. Another advantage was, that the execu tion was infinitely more eafy and fimple to the Cons. miffioners than it was before, as perfons now will not be in a fituation in which they will have to decide between their intereft and their duty. Another cir curnftance, highly in favour of the prefent meafure was, the mode of levying the tax on money borrowed on mortgage, bond, &c. In the prefent cafe, the debtor is to pay the whole of the tar, and dedndt it out of the rum borrowed, when called on to pay the lame by his creditor; to that nineteen (billings in the pound would, io all cafes, be a legal tender, and it will be attended with the advantage of concealing the eircumflances of the debtor's cafe. There, he raid, were tome of the leading features of the pill. He withed that the Houfe, if it confented to go into a Committee. would permit him to offer force elauks which he meant to offer, and which he hoped would operate as modifications. He was afraid that, when they were brought forward, the meafure would be found pregnant with difficulties, but it was the duty of the Pnufe not to finink from difficulties, however great and numerous they might be; but, on the contrary, to join cordially. by their united efforts. to make it palatable and purled as poffible. He was certain that it never was, or could be, the with of the eititens of London, not to pay their fair and equal proportion of the public burtheas ; and howe ver unpopular at the moment the idea of an Income Taw spay be amongft them, if they are to be taxed an this way in common with the tell of the kingdom, he hOped and expefted the Honourable Alderman would give the Committee the advantage of his alba. once, and inftead of (landing on the principle of oppolition to the Bill, turn has mind to every point which might tend to snake it as equal and unob)ec. ' sionabl e as poffible. After coniiisting to mire eight millions within the year, fur the ;sulk fervice, it wunecefary that the means of doing to (bould be as Ipeedily as potEnle provided. The Imam he now fubmitted to the Houfe was fuels as he thought would 'haw fair and equal contributions, by taxing income and other treats of property as nearly on a par as may he. ea4)l/C1 BASTARD erpreired himfelf perfeelyCstis lied with what had beta 1 - 441 by the Night Han. Gen tleman, and hoped every body would be made to per alike. _ _ _ • Mr. Ga toot faid, that the mode of laying the tax feoned to him to be a tax on land of is. 9tl. The AT 011111 r Giocaaas (aid. it was a milappre- Itenon of the Hon. Gentleman as to the mods at laying the tan ; that it was not a tax of ts. 9d. vas land, Ant* tax on two incomes ; rs. in the prinml on that of the landlord, and 9d. in the found on that of "the tenant. Sir R. Burrow faid, that av to the objeEtion againft 0. in the pound to he paid by the tenant, he faw no reafon in it. He conceived the tenant ro Rand in the the fame relation as a commercial man who lays out his money to make advantage of it, and as fuch he ought to be taxed. He was furprifed commercial' Gentlemen fhould objea to this tax, when the landed men do not, and at a moment when we were fighting for every thing that can be dear to us. If he were to look at it as a permanent tax, he might perhaps view it with a more jealous and fcrutiniaing eyc. but as a temporary modure, and to continue only during the war, he thoottlit it i very proper one. Lord A. ilia:iv:is wilted the proportion for Setttliusd bad been fettled according to the terms of the AA of Union. Sir F. BAR !pc raid that the objeCtion cf commer cial gentlemen to the tax was, that it was not in their power to form a pill idea of their income. Dr. La stance thought the Bill ought to go into a Committee. _ Mr. KINNAIRD fah!, that he did not rightly under. (land the reafou why this Bill had been Rated not to import a land-tax • for, in his opinion, it could be Ryled nothing elk ;hen i Tax on all manner of pro perty and profellions. ; He thought that, in faeh matters, Members ought not to be fo circumfcerled by the opinions of their Conflituents. Nereid, that he conceived it to he impoffible to imagine that. the prefent Tax, as a Tax on Income. could be lets' op preffive in its operation than the former one. Mr. W. SMITH laid, that, for his pan, be felt jut} *slink inclination to tipple any meafures adopted by Government for the public good, as any man whatever, and he was con that tome tam' 44 another was abfolutely necefary to rage a large fun within the year. It did not become any Member to clog the operations of Government by flatting any trivial objedions at fuch an important era; bat, at the fame time, it would not be proper to overlook any poffitle arguments againil the propofed mealiires. lie opp•ofed the prefent Tax from principles, which, in the abftrad, were extremely narrow. If every man, the State was to be taxed, in order Sweeten bute eqUally to the prefent exigencies, the prefent method was not the proper one to be adopted. for it was not t onfillent with the ufage of the Houfe, except in one 'finance. For though the title of the Bill erpreft ed that it was a tat on property, it was, in fad, a tax of 5 percent. on Income; a tax which would un• doubtedly bear heavily on all ranks of fociety. There were two fpecies of property embraced by this Bill : the one was the produce of labour and a:strive in. ; and the other, that kind of property, which was enjoyed by the rich, without labour. It gene. rally happened in loch a tax, that the fpecies of pro- perty acquired by induftry was liable to be taxed with the greaten uncertainty. In his apprehenfion, a per fon who contributes by his perineal indußry toward the welfare of the State, ought not to be burthened equally with a perfon who does nothing. The difpro portion was really enormous , and it was impoable for any man cor&aUy to fay, that he thought Inch a tax equal. It was alto highly objedionable with re. fped to the difclofure of the incomes of profelSonal men; for, whatfoever the convenience arifing from that difclofure in other cafes, it muff certainly fall peculiarly hard on that elate of individuals ; and be thought that even on that account it aright nor to pate. He (koala not, however, have ventured to make fuck a declaration. did he imagine it would be the means of impeding the revenue. The railing of money, howevor, urns not the only objed properly in view ; we ought to adopt thofe modes which m 0 aptly tended to keep the people in good humour. and to exalt Mote taxes which would snake the neareß ap proach towards equality and impartiality; for though fuck might not be the moil convenient to the State, he was certain they would be the molt agreeable and convenient to the people. He (poke ant merely his own fentiments on this OCCAGOn, for he bad confult ed various authors upon the fubjed. He had found that fcarcely one writer gave fentiments favourable to a tax on property. Hume was of opinion, that though Inch taxes are liable to lets expence or trouble in the collation, yet they are the molt unequal. Mr. Adam Smith lays, that in every State it has been a maxim of every wire Government to avoid the &- cloture of the property of individuals; and that au thor has repeated this opinion over and over, in va rious parts of his work; making only one exception of a (mall arißocratical Rate in Switzerland, where fuck a Mode was followed without any deuimental contninences, owing to its having no trade. It was far otherwife in commercial Rates, and that fame author feemcd to hint, that in his opinion times of neceffity may occur, when the free Rates of Holland, or England, may be compelkd to fuch a proceeding as that adopted by the Dates in Switzerland, to which he had alluded. A Spanifh author who wrote about too years ago, (but whore name or exalt words be could not at prefent remember) in (peaking of the affairs of Spain, at that time. fays. that in regard to the contribution then thought necefary to be exalted from Merchants and Traders, great tendernefs was (hewn in fuck delicate matters, left injury might arife from expofure of their real circumßances. He fbould be glad to know, therefore. whether a Britint Houk of Commons at this day. would be lets difpofed to favour commerce than the Span& Grandees were a century ago' Inflead of allowing any man's income to be taxed by petty officers, the Spauilli Govern. ment defined the iiiiiibitants to meet and afets them felves. Different, indeed. was the cafe now in quer. lion, and a material alteration was nceeffarr in the Bill as it now Rood. He was convinced, in his con. (signe t , that the Merchants of London would rather pay a tax to double the amount of that propofed, than l'ubmit to the difclofure propofed by this Bill. Thefe fentiments were fully warranted upon the au thority of Adam Smith, frequently quoted in this Houk upon great commercial (objects. when it tithed the convenience of particular Mestabet who declined that authority when unfavonrable to their purpufe. Lord 1-Liw sz we v hail not iriteridedto Lave troubled the Houk upon this fubjed ; but as the Hon. Gentleman was the only Member who fisted his re - font minutia the principles Jibe bill, he lbottlil fay a few words as to the nature of thole of jefiions. grounds of 'bore objections appe..:ed to be two, in winch he agreed with him ;--naelielv, the an tax which con y be impofed would he I.011:1" perfedly equal. Secondly, that when that is the ask we soul(' endeavour to melee them as trots' at ooffible. The Hos, htember,lioweirer.after having laid down thn& priiiiiidea. appeared to. have 101 l fight n(them. He bed.ky no .meins proved. that this tar was more unequal than any other he could desire. The • Hon. Member aproved of railing. a .contiJerable part of the fasplies within the - year ;--hut this by no means went trytaffed the other•priociple of laying onfoull tares. The plan to be adopted mull be thit ' which the eiretimaancita (tithe country fuggeff : its foam circumflances of the Country, it might be quite the fame thing, .vrliether the peuple be called upon to pay one million in one year. or ten millions in the (pace of ten years. But whether this tax be more unequal than a tax norm coofumption. he had to obferve, that knowing it all along to be the °bier% of Government in laying on taxes on confumpuon, , that they might bear equally upon different cfares of 'the community, he conceived that one of this& me thods was quite as impartial as the other. In flae h . cafes it had been found expedient to tax on e or two . articles, while others were left stuaffided, This might be inbjed to many complaints of partiality from iii. • ciividuals. In the prefent, however, the'tex wasn't laid on one or two articles, but there principaTakti: ~ cies, o tics, would bear as eqsalist Its pothltle on ait dales of the community. . lie would, however, ad.- ~. mit, that the clefs of articles might be folly as one. ,_.' qual in its effects, yet he would canon that Moo. 1 ... Gentleutan to prove that it is more unequal thatainit other Which could he• devifed. in the prefent flotation. of the Country. The objedirin made again* 'dun `" Bill. therefore. appeared to him not founded `iii, againft either its principles orapplications,lon !Kean** - it did not go nearer to that which might be Riled per. Z,' feetion. The lion. Ilembar had alluded to itSio e&I re ' "-• 'upon the laborious and indoffrious elates; thi.,lsetwo r ever, was a principle never iteknowledged by thre i I.egillature of this Country... It wai one incoofillisk •!.• with the whole train of taxation on fociety ;It' was 7- not acknowledged in the Land-tar, nor in linfporifh 1. or Poor-rate : there here been all along laid on the. A land; but coniparing all the rates of taxation, uti l e, refpedi rely bore on the different clefts of inenty, and '-;-1 admitting the foil flatement of each, he could a t ~ think, that under all circumftances, thiy bore more I feverely on one clefs than on Rayner. A. fully ad. 1, witted, that that equality in the burthens of taxation leo' the duty of Government, and the pretest sonde ha was convinced was in perfeet conformity to thisprin. t. , ciple. . Mr. HILLIARD was perfedly in favour of the p're- , fent Bill, and was connoced that a princ4aLpart 4. , the nclinm of the former tax &rote from tee dolphin. .t. in which many of the principal cleats wele fiAined.. r: • Mr. Essaina Paid. that we were nowin it &auk* s ' which mg flrike us, and which demanded our sinini- ~ tion; and he was as ready as any Member to mint •.. that this rnesfure, which might partly be Calla sty ` 0 Income Tax, ought not to be adopted unle4. - oun fituation tailed for it; but he thought our (emotion. ... did call for this and many other elesiiires to fuppo!t , ; • the State; for it appeared to him_that we arrnowltt . a great crifis of oar affairs; but he (poke it not with. t difnsay. be (poke it only to induce caution and pre- • peruke. The enemy, as it leaned to him, hairbut : two modes by which they could hope to overposaer • us; the one was, to invade us, mid the Other, to - • render our expencea more then we can bear. Theft '. people were more numerous than ours, and therefore • they might be infpired, by the hopes of plunder, to invade us; and therefore if this country was invaded with effelt, or invaded at all. it could only be, because we do not hew among (glutei ves a fpirk-of unanimity in its defence. How was it Finale to make an ba= predicts on ten millions of men, refolred to diked • . our Ifland, and with fupericr means of defence 1 He could not (Upon& that iiwafion was be way in which France meant to import kngland : he thought they would attack us in another way, to make vie adopt a fyftern lb expeufive, and continue it fb I..ot'lio tire out the people , and. in the end. to pek e MP,. content under their boathens; to create divifoinn among ns, and finally, to occasion& that which nothing but difunioo among ourfelves could . It was our duty to ourfelves to fruftrate that and - and to countered it, which we would only de• union and readinefs to make facrifiees worthy of the object. It appeared to him, therefore. that the rith. ought to make facrifices, and to content to any pai 'redoes of the enjoyment of chair wealth, and to bear a large portion of the public bertha's, .It Teemed to him, that the more krupulous honour able Members were (t live helicred theist elite .' be equally defirous to profarei liwir country) about - a few guineas, the morethey cavilled agaioff AblP „; inequality Many tat, the more they would faularyihe / enemy. It was for this rsafon that he wilily* the prefent incofura to be fupported, ilthfrogh W to. fembled the late Income Bill on which lin neve/ (poke. Hs confidered this Bill is a mash sieM Cary for our fituation at this moment ; not cos& dering it as a permanent • impalas, but as the mesas of fopporting us in a crifis, he fupported it therefore, - and the more ready we were to fiew our unanitrAtf e end to bury our little differences of violas, the ti ter; indeed, it was abfolutely neceffary . Abe Poufs &mild pnrfue that courfe. for bow amid the Was rape& the people to come forward with unanimity, if the Houle of Cowman, infixed of felting them the example, should be debating on little points, of' bow many guineas one man might be made to pay sties than another. As to the difference to which Ms Fiiend upon the floor (Mr. W. Smith) alluded. the difference if that Wears which a man deelecd hose that which was certain, and that shish was *cooked by labour, diligence, or ever: ion, he could calf Orb that in the prefent cafe it was a thingsot wordiness:d ing to. when the object was that of providieg for the safety of the State—his own income was by his own aseroon, and it was.a property which was not worth two years purchafe, but yet be &could not oppok it. for it was necerary • and the Houk would tangle& that l'arliamem had ated the principle adds Bill is another meafure; and that in a cafe in wbich. s his opinion. the neceffsty was leff urgent s ands she" - tors, ankh sfubffitate was found for this nissillunff• tbould consider the objedions affered to it as no ob. jedions at all. He was ready to make this em say other fecritiees to defend Lis vnintry in that Hogli% or ,nit of It; he &told not fcruole to allow aft pock of his we me as any other mac trisok income was perstansni. although he knew and fek that he got his bread nrt only by the (west of his brow. betwit l .4 mire toll toilet that both of bafil! and snealnkelps tam, for ha said that this writ trt the Oise 'fos cs,lk fm a tile v Wllll hut 1.3 felt; This ef th, COITIT ennit Ile c Tearc .estie ant be • to *fa 11 Int.; I = bail _A! Iti VIIII UMW LI% 3 Ptr al # 7 / 1 3 Fir Alai no.. Ji - diii Ansi Ain fpec • Teti, amo nett, ratio: theri coul d tie &on tbe fats Pr