Star. — London, England, 1817-12-11 00:00:00

to have been committed towards him by the persons I enuSted. It is true he was subsequently dissatisfied with his son's management of business; he was not on le:rtes of great intimacy with him; and even in turpo.:ed to throw an obstacle in the way of his marroige, by stating that his son had no reason to expect any more from him. With his daughter Letitia, it appears he lived on ill terms. She indeed attended on him during his last illness, as did his son. They both paid him great attention on this occasion; and it appeared to the servants that he eras perfectly reconciled to them. If the observations of the ser vants be correct, the facts they speak to, strongly mark returning kindness on his part ; hilt still there is nothing coining front the deceased himself which marks any intention to alter his testamentary arrange ments. The will propounded is wholly is th e h an d• writing of the son, who is the Residuary Legatee named in it. This circumstance, no doubt, in all cases requires explaaatiots. Now what is the expla nation here given It is admitted to have been writ ten without any instructions from the deceased : and U.! drawing it up is thus stated by Mr. &lest. He saes, 4 4 that Mr. Archer told I:im that he (Arc:iei ) arid his sister Letitia were sitting together one even ing, a few days before the deceased • died ; that lie said to It's sister, he wondered how their lather would• leave his property, that he (the son) would sketch a will, and compare it with the deceased's sifter hi. bath ; that the cne he would sketch should be what he thought ought to satisfy all the family ; and that Ise did accordiugly draw out a paper, which is the very will now propounded, wed which he kept locked up till the very morning of the day on which the de ceased died." Now, the expression of 4‘ wondering" seems rather odd ; for the son seems to have been sufficiently informed how the grand-children were left. However, this account of the writing does not go at all to correct the origination of the will with the de ceased. It is not drawn up in pursuance of any in- Eructions from him, but merely as a matter of curiosi ty, to be compared after his death with the real will. Neither is it suggested that this•will was in any ma nner communicated to the deceased till within five or six hours of his death; and then only by twice reading it over to him. This Court will not lay it ;lowa as an universal rule, that a ssi;l drawn up without instruc tions, written by the residuary legatee, and read over by him, revocatory of a previous complete disposi. thin, cannot be establiihed ; but it is not saying too touch to assert, that a will, under such circumstances, would require evidence of the most satisfactory kind, Mewing that the deceased fully knew and understood the nature and effect of the instrument, and that' be freely and solemnly adopted it as his will. It is a sort of axiom in the decisions of this Court, that where the capacity of the testator is doubtful, there must be full proof of insuuctions, or of something tantamount to instructions. It is a proposition equally received' 'in these Course, that where an instrument is drawn up by the hand of the party benefited, there must be 'at least full proof ref capacity. Some persons erro. !lowly imagine, that it a testator can understand the moot simple proposition. an instrument executed by him must take effect, however intricate and compli • gated; but that is not the true doctrine of this Court. The capacity must be equal to the act; there must be a mural conviction in the mind of the Court. that the testator was capable of understanding, and did understand the whole instrument, and that the whole was his will. What evidence is sufficient to produce that moral conviction, must vary . according to the *tabor circumstances of every case. It the will be tendered to the deceased for execution by an indiffe rent person, or prepared by his confidential Solicitor, the Court will generally presume the from the mere execution; but where the instrument is of a dif ferent character, the degree of capacity must be more closely scrutinised. Under the circumstances of the present car, it becomes extremely material there fore to lee what was the state of the deceased's capa city at the time of executing the instrument in ques tion. He had been indisposed for a month pre. oleos'', he had been confined to his"room for a week. and to his bed for three days. In the tatter stages of his disorder it had changed to a diarlaca, producing extreme debility of body, and of course a weisimued mind. Oa Sunday, the Sd of December, ' Mr. Guest, a friend of the family, visited him, and ;bought his conversation shoved that he was in . full tiosseuion of capacity ; but be did not then talk much bet atcoent of his illness and of his wishing to obtain the refreshment of sleep. On Monday morning, the litli of December. Mr. Guest thought him in the same state; but be does not appear to have then had any conversation with him. Dr. Johnstone, the physician, saw him that morning , between eleven and twelve , and thought him then in a dying state, and that he could not live above a few hours. Mr. Allen who was with him between one and two, says, he did not utter one word which he could understand. Of the two maid-servants who are examined, one says, that be became drowsy within half an hour after the en• cation of the will, and did not utter above one word more before his death. Mr. Guest returned againbe tween three and four. and found that a very material alteration had taken place, that his eyes looked dim, he was in the hands of death, his mental I acuities were newly, if not quite gone, and he had lost his senses. The Learned Judge here stated several other circum stances in the evidence, to shew,that during the whole of thismorning the deceased's faculties were rapidly -declining. At this time Mr. Thomas Archer, the son, was clearly aware of the former disposition 01 his father's property, for be says to Dr. lolinsume, 4. that it was of the greatest importance that his father should be prevailed upon to alter his will, as he had loft his property very unequally, leaving it to his ,grand-children, pissing over his children, and leav ing his youngest daughter tet ally destitute." Tu which Dr. Johnstone replied by expressing his doubts whe. ther the deceased was adequate to a business of so much importance. The son, however, sets about pro curing the execution of the paper which he had Were written _oat merely from curiosity. lie substitutes OM entirely new will, and one of an extremely complicated nature, its the place of that will which the deceased had formerly executed. Now the question which the Court has to decide is, whether the . deceased did freely and knowingly adopt the whole and every part of this new Will t it is impossible, in such a case as this, to adopt the course suggested in argument of taking part and rejecting part; tt is one entire act which the Court has here to decide upon. The only grand suggested either to cis( deceased or to Dr. Johnstone for the new will, is the desdtnte state in which the daughter was left under the other will. Now how stands the evidence of the deceased's intentions even on that point r That he may have acted very unjustly and very unkindly towards his daughter is very possible; but that is a circumstance which the Court has no right to lrok at. and if it had there is nothing before it to thew the real state of that question. Mr. Guest urged him very notch in favour of his daughter on the Sunday night ; but even in that weak state the deceased refused to do any act in compliance with those requests. He said, No, OM now ; let her behave well and 1 will do well by her." We then come to the reading of the will.— The first witness on this heed is the charwoman. She seems to have fallen into some mistake, for she says, contrary to all the other witnesses, that thi will was read over to the deceased before Dr. Johnstone came. However, whether she be right or wrong in this parti cular, it comes to nothing ; for she adds, that the de ceased refused to excente it then, saying, No, no." Tbe next witnesses are two maid servants. They carry the matter very little further ; and besides they are to be heard with caution; for they evidently in terested themselves in favour of Miss Letitia Archer, as it was natural they should t they have besides been retained in the service of Mr. Archer, and some little pains have been taken to refresh their memories from time to time by the successive solicitors of the parties; and though the Court does not mean to intimate that INS was done with a view to tutor them improperly, yet it necessarily creates a caution in we'ehing the mi. nine circumstances to which they speak ; and it is certain that the Court can pay little attention to their opinion, and none at all to their conjectures in the question of the deceased's capacity. The Physician attended about noon, and after he went away the poultice and applications of mustard, which he had ordered, mete applied to the deceased's ancles, and the deceased was set up in his bed, and supported in this position, while Mr. 'Phonies Archer, his son, read the will over to him, and told him that it was what his friends thought proper, mentioning several names in which the witnesses are not exactly agreed. At all events, this mode of introducing the subject, was one likely to influence him, and also to take off his attention from the purport and effect of the will, the object of which was also represented to him in general terms, but not correctly, as meant to benefit his daughter. After the first reading, the deceased said, 44 No, no." He was the:; urged both by his ton and daughter, and also by one of the maid str eams. At length he said. Con it over again."— It was read again to him, and be said nothing. It was never explained particularly to him ; never even read over clause by clause, and his opinion asked on the separate clauses; but at last, thus sitting up in bed, it is put before him, • pen is put into his hand, he is assisted by his son, and a mark is made. One witness says, she heard him say, is I 'can never re pent," and saw him point with the pen to the writ ing; but the other witnesses mention nothing of these facts. Mr. Allin, one of the subscribed witnesses, says, that the deceased muttered something, but he could nut understand him. Taking this statement in a favourable yoinKof view, does it prove that the de. "aware knew the contents of the will; that he was - aware of their weirs and effect? Independently of the want of capacity, here is a degree of solicitation which, in such circumstances, must be looked ,upon with ;peat jealousy. The transaction was not ended till near two-fibers after the visit of Dr. Johnstone, and less than two hours Wore the return of Mr. Guest...4lllde: all the circumstances, the Court, without imputing fraud to the parties, feels itself compelled to pronounce against the will, with costs. OLD HAMBY SESSIONS. Yesterday Joseph Mom was convicted of stealing a quantity of brass door handless:id window fasten. ings from the Rectory.house at Hillingdon, the pro perty of Lord Boston. The prisoner was employed as bricklayer's labourer ; and being suspected of the theft, was apprehended, and confessed the robbery. The prisoner, and a man of the name of Often. had sold the articles to Mr. Blenheim, an ironmonger.— Green was examined, stated himself to be a brick layer employed in the house, and confessed that he and the prisoner had taken the goods. The prisonet was recommended to mercy on account of Ws former good character. JAB Lem* mid Ricks?' Tisseetusw were indicted for cutting and stripping, with intent to steal, 1121 b. of lead, the property of Charles Blasdell. The evi dence against Lecese was not sufficiently strong, but Thompson ,was convicted. .. The RECORDER told Lecase that he might think himself very lucky in getting off, for he added, a you are a notorious character ; 1 remember you very well. This is not the first time you have appeared at this bar. One would have thought that the pu nishment you have already received would have de. tarred you from committing any further crimes." The officer also stated that the prisoners were well known characters. Leease had been already convicted of a burglary, had been transported, and had been Many times in the House of Correction.—:- Lecase, when apprehended, told the officer that if he got off he would 64 rap his pate for him." Maria Thompson, Aims Frith, alms Germain, Thomas Gerwaia. and Alma Frith, were indicted—Marie Thompson for stealing from the person of James Anderson bank notes ; to the amount of iir6S, and Anne Frith, Thomas Germain, and Eliza Frith, for receiving the same, knowing them to be stolen. The prosecutor is a person of respectable appear ance. He stated, that on the 21st of November, in the night time, while passing the Horse Guards, he was accosted by Maria Thompson, who enticed him into a' public house near at hand. There he had some liquor, and felt the effects of it in his head.— Presently he perceived something taken from his pocket, and in an instant missed Lis money, tunsis ting of three £2O notes, and five sel bank notes.— He had some faint recollection of having seen the other three prisoners at the same time, but he could not be certain. Immediately upon missing his notes, Maria Thompson VAR off he followed and took her to the watch-house. There he made his charge against the prisoner, and was much infuriated at the loss of his money. He expressed himself rather warmly upon the subject, and be was in consequenee put into the Mad halt. The next morning he ap. peered with die prisoner before the Magistrate, and stated his case. , _ Gilmore, an officer, proved, that do the 22i 6f November, in the morning, be saw .the prima, L'lromas Germain, and c in cansegnenre of informi lion he had received, tamed him with'having a £2O note in his possetsion. Germain positively' denied it, clasped his hands together', loaked up to Heaven, and said that he hoped Goa would never allow him to unciasp his hands if he had it in his possession. The officer Tom, this won't do, 1 know you hive the note, and I will make it stare riu in the film"— He then searched the prisoner, and in die lining of his hat found the note. " What do you sly to this r. said Gilmore, shewing him the note. .ga 0, (he re plied) I know nothing of it—l do not know how it got there." John Blewett stated, that he had formerly cohabi ted with the prisoner Thompson. On the night of the 21st of November, at about II or 12 o'clock, she put three 1/20 notes into his hand. He thought she, had not come honestly by them. The next morning he accompanied Thomas Geranain to a Mr. Dobrie, a pawnbroker, in Oxford-street, and charged one of the twenty pound notes, ptirchasing at :Le same time a silver watch for two guineas and a hail: Another twenty pounds note was changed at a public house, kept by a Mr. Emery. Cross-examined--He was hirnsTlf in custody. Al. though he suspected, when the notes acre put into his hand by Thompson, that all was not right, he went with Germain to change them. He now lived in the same house with Thompson, and now cohabi ted with her. Mr. Dobrie, a pawnbroker, produced the JO2O note delivered to him by GermAin. An officer proved, that in a gown lift at N. 7S, Peter -street, belonging to Anne Frith, 17 41 notes were found awed up in it. Two £2O notes produced were sworn by the pro. senator to be his property. l'he prisoners all avowed their innocence, and some witnesses were calleJ to char.tcter. The Jury, after much consideration, found a vet. pier of Guilty against Maria Thompsun, and Acquit ted the other prisoners. gilvar was indicted for stealing a book, the property of R. Simmons, a bookseller in Barbican. An Officer met the prisoner with something under his arm. Suspecting him, he examined and found a second volume of a dictionary, which the prosecutor proved to be that stolen from him. The pawner, in his defence, said he was impor tuned in the street, by a stranger whom be met to buy this book. He refused, saying that he was no scholar. The man stilt pressed him, atsd he gave him Is. 6d. for it. On his way home, he was anxious to bow the value of thi Oook. as he had a brother who was a scholar p he therefore called into a book seller's shop, who said it was French, and could only be read by one in a hundred. Three witnesses gave the prisoner a good charac ter.--Nerdict, Not Guilty. The ItSCORDit." Prisoner, take care in future how you dabble in books. A poet has said, " Mink It Is a dangerous thiug, " Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring r The prisoner retied !tom the bar, promising be would let books alone in future, haying got so little by them on the present occasion. Gut nitata..—Yesterday Mr. J. Knott, a respect able vintner in Salisbury -court, Tket-street, appeared to answer an information laid by S. Bosanquer, Esq.. of Wimpole-street, Cavendish-square, charging him with unlawfully harbouring and secreting a spaniel dog, the property of the complainant, knowing the same to have been stolen. There was another infor mation, charging the defendant with purchasing the said dug, knowing it to have been stolen. Mr. Am maws, who attended in support of the information, stated, that the defendant was charged upon the sta tute of the 10th Geo. 111. which enacts,'' that if any person shall harbour or secrete a dog, knowing the same to have been stolen, he shall, upon convietim, be subjvct to a penalty not less than £20," and for purehaping a dog under the same circumstances, the punishment is a penalty of £3O. This proceeding, the Learned Counsel said, •would not have been adopted, had not the conduct of the defendant pro voked it. Mr. Bosanquet deposed, - that he purchased the animal of a man of the name of Taierner, in May last. He gave four guineas for it, but would not take thtice that sum Writ now. The dog having become diseased, the witness entrusted him to the care of a man named Banks, for the purpose of being cured. On the 20th of November, the dog was missing from Banks's house, and some days after in formation was received that it was in the possession of Mr. Knott. Witness saw the dog at Mr. Knott's, and knew him to be the one he had lost. Mr. Knott offered to restore the dog, if the informant could make out a prior possession of him. Banks proved that the deg was not tied up while he had him to cure, and that he had strayed from his house, and had not been stolen. Upon this evidence, the infor- I autism was quashed. • howArrumar—Yestenlay a young man was brought to the Office, from Covent Garden watch-house, charged by Donaldenn, the constable belonging to Covent Garden Theatre, with making a disturbance at the box entrance to Are Theatre on Tuesday night. As the prisoner attributed his improper and violent conduct to intoxication, be was discharged. A young man was charged by Baker, the constable belonging to Druty-lane Theatre. with making a dis turbance at'that Theatre, aho on the same evening. Baker stated that the prisoner bad yesterday musing begged pardon, and made every possible concession for his improper conduct, and which he was convin ced arose from excess of liquor.—Discharged. Woainue-stscr.—Joie Morgan, a woman abotit twenty-four years of age, was charged with being riotous and disorderly. On examination. the follow. ing affecting narrative was developed :—The unfor tunate woman was born in Slurreititch, and by bet own industry acquired a small sum of money. A silver-cane-mounter became her suitor. and they were married on a Monday; and on the following Wed nesday, possessing himself of her little all, he abscon ded, and has not since been heard of. It is suspected be went to America. This circumstance plunged her into great distress; and preyed on her mind so much that she became deranged. Some humane gentleman got her into a madhouse, where sae re mained a considerable time, but a:is at last diseti.tr sed ; she had no means of subsistence except some claims she had upon St. Lake's St. Giles's Cripple. gate, and Shorediteb. They all aclused to relieve her till het proper settlement seas ptoved, M et 'lady again returned, and she Was a second time fined in a madhouse till considered sane, sollm was discharr,ed. Then she was under 14e tressing circumstances as before, the r „ f ing to relieve her tinier the former pretence, anti was compelled to wander about the streets . t i t i food, and in the severest AfiliCtlol. On m encLy si.e applied to the Alderman at Guildhall, who Rt ted her a sumtn!m; for one of St. Giles', that if she had no claim upon that parish, sh e he passed to her ripht settlement ; but bei n up and now kept in the watch-hottse, she was vat ohany b ene fi t t h at alight .:: , :e from this mons. She was instantly eiEcLar i .,;(l, an d one. Overseers of Shorcditcli, was present, wa s tiered to relieve her till her Itzai pace of • can be ascertained. Tuesday night the ship Zvi:3r, bound to tar, commanded. by Captain Mounts, lying in Thames, was plundered ot a voluaMe bale of Monday it person was take:, i.:to custody at Canterbury Bank, on suspicion of fol . gine a power of attorney, and cot:ln:mod to Westgate for farther examinatiiin. Several depredations were committed „ t Fai►. Amongst others, a hawker, of the name Squire, was robbed of his pack, containing apparel, &c. and a stall, furnished by Mr. CAL draper, was plundered of a qu-mtity of sho;s other articles. Three persons intp,icated in the beties are committed for trial at the next Sessions the town and port of Hythe. Thursday night last, in the neighbourhood Islington, four men, haviog a dead body Kith were taken by-the watch, upon the sopposi t ,,, n having stolen it from some burial.ground. being called upon to give an account of thei, they very adroitly stated that ft was the corpse fia person who had died in an I-I , ispital of the T ?ever, and which they were conveying, away ti purpose of burial. This sti;ry had the desired ei the watchmen and every one present, at the of Typhus Fever, fled with the utmost expedit with the exception of the Constable of the Nil who informed the prisoners that there was no ch: against them, and desired them to quit the w house without delay with their burden. BIRTH. Nov. 24, at St. Margaret's, Roctinter, the wife of the Francis Barrow s of a son. nd i eP"a n::d: e r ecvs r a s :"dl 1121:'11 . 4141: the P.sti'lles T pretence, :Ind sh treets u;tne,l • Ott Monday h saildha who Rest • Overseer ; parish, she migh ; bet being Like tse, she was depri , :e fro:a this solo r!: d, and oneof th s present, teas p!ace of settlerne , bound to Gibs, :trots, lyin4 in 61e bale of c!nth' .:to custody at t fa-gang a seamar Lt to Westgate gs mined at Hr of the name containing teearin i by Mr. Carpent miry of sho e s an s;icated in the to! ht ntxt Sessi o ns I neighbotabocd id body Kith the the suppoilti,rn ground. On punt of them selve WaS the corpse of 'tat of the Tsrpl,r, eying away tot th I the desired effect .nt, at the nteetio utmost expeditsoe table of the Nig!•,t tete was no char! to quit the watch .den. the wife of the Le nt Charles Norton, Esher Rivaling Sta the runner place. sy, aged rutty-lira, t et, Bridget Elie tear of !Waster. Wm. Flamank,D. /Winton and Gly lion, and a M iglstrat rnwall. Tire Item ge. ank, Rozhester, whit tin Allen, late a pan sge of 'wady is year illness of many y hratres Royal Cu Andress, in th. Slt data convjtuttor.;•" powar:: he had bee Foctersy tic cipally clistitignieb as, orderly man ba Second He hal r nd was very generali demeanour of his ' ad by :he mturfic ations of the Duke +er annum. io aidi ration of his sercte.: iomerest feeling, daughter, who u i, AND DEATHi. iumas ()rifts, Makolm, of the I y of the Rev. fa Esq. Paymaster, I Nuance, Mitriour! i !InNIB R MSt :e y ea I:l9ls . ylFll6.7e r iad. . rii:l Gri lf6:llE:nle t: ::rw s i ta l:s4' .. :::: valo, Avistar• le • e n ton. i tae ns • f l : i the s A : N s .3 4 . 1 F , e: LawarT• Apothecary, a - .'at:• 'lro try or. the Hon. r k ls 27 pr. s 124.) 1 9 t: 1 r t. Ace. HO " leket., .tsti sv. Pricer gs. Od . ta 04 . • :41 mitt OW 4 19 . ...... .H ,vat MARRIED. Tuesday ae i nnight, at ratites, Lieutenant Charles . the 90th light infantry, commanding the Lzetbr Rttn Lion, to Aunt, daughter of Mr.). Goss, of the former . 1 be loth Wt. ac Garbdale, Clem, aged ;' Miss Allaa, aged. witcbteca. DIED. Deo. 1, at her father's, in Henrietta -street. Bridget only daughter of the Rev. R. Abraham, Vicar of !Waster. Nov. 19, at Bodmin, Cornwall, the Rev. Wm. late Fellow of 'Trinity College, Rector of Uddiogton ton in that county, a Prebendary of Emitllion, and for the countie. cat (Word, Devon, and Cornwall. ' of Oddington is in the gift of Trinity College. - Nov. 30. suddenly, on St. Ala:garret Bank, Ro: sitting with his write at breakfasr, Mr. John Alien, I st the Victualling Office, at tLe advanced age of nearl? Lately, In his 4Gth year, after a pr.itt`ul illness of r- Mr. Melvin, comedian, formerly of the Th za t r e s Garden and Lyceum. Dec. 3, in Colchester, Lieutenant John Andreni year of his ay: he wat * a man of a very robust con. la his early days possessed zirest muscular i in various engagements, amongst which Dezingeo and Culloden, were those wherein he bad principally himself, in the former of which he weed as orderli present Majesty's grandfather, George the Second sided in Colchester upwards f 43 years, and was • esteemed for the peaceable and respeaable dem mestic habits. H s latter years were elteersi by of his Sovereign, who, upon the representations of York, bestowed upon hint a grant of .f.•.. 9 per (noun to his half pay; which benevolent conoderation of , was always remembered by hint wi It the sincerest gratitude. He has left behind bunt a grand daughter, posed to be the only relation now living. EAST INDIA BIRTHS, MARRIAGES, AND CEYLON.—BIRTHS. At Colombo, the Lady of the Rev. Thomas Gi don ary, of a eaughier. At Rainapora, the Lady of Lieutenant Makoim, Ceylon Regiment, of a sun. At Colombo, of a daughter, the , Lady of the Chaser. Missionary. At Colombo, the Lai) , of J. Bourtead, Esq. Paymaster, Ceylon Regiment, of a daughter. At Jaffna, the L.ady of the Rev. T. IL Squanee, of a son. DPATH3: At Colombo, oft the 26th May, in the 15th year Mist lienriea Catharine, eldest daughter of Mr. F. At Point tie Gant:, on the 29'b May, John Caviar gear of his Majery% Ist Ceylon Regiment. At Badulla in Ouva, on the 44th May, Mrs. IK 7 S.l). Wilvm , Big. residi.nt at 13adulla. At Colombo, the infant daughter of J. Bousteal, master. lit Cryl4n Regiment. At Colombo, the Infant daughter of the Rev. T. MAURI rays —DEATH. April 11, Mr. Mater de St. Pierre. April 14, Mr. Noel Betel. April 16, Mr. Francis Corlior. 1 fIgGAI.•••MARRIACI7.3. At St. John's Cathedra', Mr. John C thecary to Dr. Nosky, to Miss Margaret D. S. EOM At St. John's Cathedral, Major it. J. Latter, of einem, N. 1. to Mrs. Sealy. At St. John's Cathedral, I.itut. James Robin, of Estahlislinient, to Miss Eliza elaclachian. At St. John's Church, Lieut. J. P. Pett:iefativr, oil Regiment, to Mess Ellen Dic%son. At !hi. Cathedral, %%rm. Ainslie, Esq. Assi-tnnt.Sut lion. Company's Service. to Miss IVlarzsret At the house of J. W. PAV.OII. Esq. % at kir , fe. Esq. 01111 e Civil Service, to Mt s A to l.Ntdy, at Benares, Mr. V. W. Hurley, Arsthecar to the Lin - Glivan I losp.t4 at Cbunar, to Mos Arra Tr At Chittagong, limey Walttrs, of the Hon. Civil St rvice, to Miss Jen,ina Aline I.lt:lejohn, CAA! Lieut.-Colonel Peter Littlejohn. _ _ - PRICIi. 0} 61LOCK 1/ ES ITI(.AI' Bank stock, 291 i India Mock ked. 89183 82* 1,14:41 lkones, 97 pr- Coos. shut Excb. Bills (2d.) I. 4 per Cent. 994 i; --..... Ad.) Spec Ct. shut Cvos. tor Aec. 8411 Lg. Ann.. 21 MG * lArtery Ticket., i ... _ C)AL, MAktKEI, Stripiest Market. Ships enid. 511 Newcastle 344 5 Sunderland 5 0 Cinders 11, 425. Oti. 4 os. taL cos. Od. wAnsit•To moiutow AT LOl4lllO. Morning as min AttaiThwn . - • 11l ... LONDON s Pivs:ed and Vublssilvd by Laval lasi,.'" : ' Place, Trrylv-1.14.