Star. — London, England, 1817-04-26 00:00:00

only roper salt for toting fish ; and it had lately n explained. that this system of excluding the tuce t itt:u r countries from this market would u i.ly Line , us oat of the oreign market in tutu- (f/gar, hear). • CUIOVEN protested wth mos,: warmth lost the mem rial read—it displayed more clearly tecessity there was for Parliament interfering and 'eating she exclusive monopoly which these inte (ed pers , ics sought to establish in common with the nt II mourable Gentleman—(Near, arar).—The ...sing want of subjects for labour had driven the i,tt ' the Houses of Parliament, and the p eop l e of ,fools, to shifts without end, and measures •recwde-ted in the annals of this country. The of salt would, more than'any thing yet pro. NI, isscresse one Main of labour. It would be '? A great soiree of manufacture, and a grand l e f u r foreign trade. There were not now more 60,000 persons employed iti our fisher ies, while Alorti every labouring man was a fisherman.— , 2,800 m;',:s of coast, and an innumerable acres of fishery, this country received not near , c eo.pence per acre of its fishing farm, it it might caned, wailst Holland made above twelve slid _ _ per acre. A sum of five millions would be ne• to support those out of employment in the resent distressed state of the country, come front ,i. ru e e it might. Now would it not be much more - ,able to expend four millions in giving bounties . he ii, L ing trade, and set those unemphreed sea -1 mi d °dm- people thus at work, and twin them or the streets and workhouses I—Vicar, bear) — 'limns that it took W 6 worth of tish to lied a of drat ,e 4 worth might be considered labour re, the rernaming se2 going for capital, lice was immense advantage ; the capital was nothing, the Au every thing. Since ever this country had be. a mat stacturing country, the criais had been ruing to which we had at kngth arrived. Up to we repotted our grain, which was then the id stare of this country, from 2 to 81:3,000,0c0 annually, siece then we had become an impor couutry. This was the consequenee of drawing so many hands from agricultuse to our mom nes, one in tour being now the proportion of the iteacturiis to the other branches of employ. :. The consumption of food became Cain asto argiy tocreased ; a man who in the agricultural should consume the produce of duce acres, Id be tumid iu the manufacturing state to use the lute tit sex ; the vragts of the one enabled him ion with that snow which the other must hare ranged with care. Should this spirit of manulac- I wend over Europe generally, the consumption kW would thereby =crease one-seventh .at least. the rate of Oat stone of salt to each person, there requisite for our consumption nut less than AO tons yearly. - t roar stock of other's, amoun t° 30 millions, a saving might be effected by its ace of duty, in curing the rot, of not less than Three Readied Thousand Pounds annually. Four -It'd thousand tous would be requited for this Et use ; atid in the manufacturing of iron, which ,as Wand could be produced in a much purer and state by its assistance. Lord Dundonald had discovered, that, by its assistatice, soap could be ilactured out of oil. Here was an opportunity proving the whale fishery, and at a momentwhen external light was about to be derived from He mach wished his Majesty's Ministers had • the Malt 'Fax and the Salt Tax. Five hones of salt, a poor family's share, cost them SOs. • they paid one-twentieth of the produce of labour to this tax, whilst the man of grio,coo , a annum, did not feel it at all in comparison. No source of taxation would be stopped up, he cont.:b• by going into the Committee, where he firmly ' a new and better source of revenue might be irom granting salt free of duty•; but in mother wee its free use would put into the pocket every former not less than se2o a year. For hint he was convinced it would snve him on a stock .130 head of cattle and 500. sheep, not less than 1200. He should be happy to see Ministers substi • aProperty l'ax of 42 per cent. on the rental of 4 farms, which would pay infinitely better, and be cuesidered a boon when accompanied by the repeal the Salt Duties.' These were no times lot. experi ments, yet such was the general &stress, that some thing experimental must be tried ; and nothing, he satisfied, would' be effectual except it. was deri from our own internal resources. dlr. ROBINSON feared much lest the exaggerated !the advantages to be derived from the repeal the Salt Tax should induce those who had not the matter to think that more good would the measure than was fairly to he reckon- Ton. It would appear as if immediate life and. was to be diffused into all our foreign and do . relations by this repeal of Salt Duties. But it not to. Furst, no offer had been made of a com • by the Honourable Mover, perhaps because of none —the last speaker had, it was true, one, but that, he felt, would meet wi•:: general opposition ; and secondly; the fact of being at the very low price of 2d. per pound, that the price of it was scarcely at all affected &It Duty, or, if affected, it must be enhanced . than the fraction of a farthing per pound. as this an object The want of a market for our fish WAS felt, not the want of money to purchaie Tile regulations of the pending Bill had been Si inconvenient. Every thing should be dorie to render its reguhnions more convenient ; but greatest indulgence had been granted the fiche the revenue could not at present he dispensed The pamphlet of a Mr. Parkes, an ingenious 1, had been ailuded to. It certainly conveyed intottnation, but it was of a very refined notate. +puke, for instance, of sal-ammoniac, and the :t chat a repeal of the Salt Duties would have op rice ci that article; why this would be but a of iwater in the ocean, for the whole quantity of mimatiac consumed in the country was less than tons. In Mr. Parkes's pamphlet, much sttess Laid on the influence of these duties upon the used in chemical pursuits—such, for ex as corrosive sublimate, and calomel, which as ‘t medicines, were in general use, and no I2y A t ey h a d al l telt the good effects of them—. • L . P w )• lint could th ese cons id erat ions he s et iouity ','"q and yet it w as o f suc h- co l our i ng t h e w h o l e "'re was composed. The Honourable Member Conde, (Nr. Citroen) supposed Leh tp I . 'pe a good , las in prtveuting what was called the rot its sliceP• I tiri . :at did Lord S . ()mini& (no bad iatiteri) sa)r on this 'point ? it was his opinion that one ton of salt (the value of which was only 1130) would mistier in this respect for 1,000 sheep in the course of a year; so that all the advantages that cdtild be derived from , this recipe were to, be obtained at the rate of 6J. or 7.1. per sheep. Could any man say that the price of salt, or the dearness occasioned by the duty on it, prevented its tile in the cure of sheep ? Weil, then, as to its utility as manure—here it was Said a bushel to pn acre would suffice for the experiment—(.6 No," from Mr. Cteroueen). Suppose the!. three bushels were necessary, even at the present ptice, that.would be found the cheapest way of going to work. It was, therefore, evident, that the dearness of the article did not prevent its use on such occasions. If then, it did not prevent its use, would the House, in the present financial state of the country, cut off W 1,500,000 of revenue, and without the proposition of any subrti tute whatever? And here he thought it was locum b?nt on the man proposing the repeal of a tax ' such as the pre s ent, t o s h ew some pro b a b le means of filling up the blank ; for be it remembered, that this is not A tax about to expire, or one, the renewal of which is about to be proposed by the Chancellor of the Ex chequer, but it is an old tax, in lull force, and there fore dtff.rently situated. In this view of the subject he could nut certainly consent to the abolitiqn of so efficient a source of the public revenue ; and the House would do well to pause and consider the matter well before they countenanced such a proposition. Mr. WILLIAM SMI Ili concurred in the last sentence that had fallen from the Right Hon. Gen tleman who had last spoken, though it led him (Mr. Smith) to a very different conclusion ; for he would vote for a Committee, for the purpose of considering , the matter well, and the Right Hon. Gentleman would resist such a course, though it WAS the only 1 one open for the calm consideration which lie v.erntti to invite. All his Hon. Friend (Mr. Cal:Jolt) asked, was, that they should ge into a Committee, to com pare the assertions made on the one side and the , other—io probe them point by point—and loin' a fair and rational view of the arf,umenta at each side, ito come to a jest conclusion on the general question. 1 This could only be done in a Coalmine:. and there I alone could the assertions of the agriculturists, the 1 case of the fisheries, and other points, be minutely dis• I cussed and decided. If they went into the Commit-1 tee on this subject they would, he was convinced, I come to the same decision that characterised th 2 pro-, ceedings of former Committees—namely, a recom. 1 mendation of the repeal of the tax—a reconemenda- 1 tion never defeated except in a genera; loose debate 1 its-that House. 'f he Right Hon. Gentleman oppo site (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) belonged to', a 'Committee, and was, he believed, the framer of a Report that recommended ' this repeal. He (Mr. Smith) was of opinion, that if the tax were abolished,: no eventual loss of revenue would be felt ; but, even if it were, that was nothing t 6 set against the univer sal inconvenience felt by the continu ince of the duties. It was ridiculous to say, that the price per bushel was low enough to indpce the agriculturist to make the experiment with sal( in manure. The con trary was the tact. The farmer would not run the risk of trying one, two, or three bushels, at a duty of 15s. on each. The Right Hon. Gentleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) had said, that no grie vance existed, because no petitions for the repeal had emanated from those concerned in the fisheries, &c.. There were two reasons why no petitions had been. sent from such a quarter t—the first was, that the fishermen knew welt no repeal would take place by merely sending up petitions I they felt, that it never would be conceded unless through the medium of Government. And, secondly, it was a notorious tact, that all heal/ duties threw the trade affected by', them into the handsel a tew—a monopoly was there- ' by insured, and the parties were, of course, anxious to maintain it. Those now concerned had, doubtless, found out the means of securing illicit profits, from the privilege of working salt, duty free ; for, with 1 all the restriction; there were many ways by which the parties could indemnify themselves by a system i of evission. But when the Right Hon. Gentleman I said there were ne petitions, did he not know that there were many memorials preseoted to the Treasury, con-' vrying complaintaof the operation of these duties f WhY was this fact coacealed?—(Hear, hear).—The I Right Honourable Gentleman had said, that if the House entered into the inquiry, during the progress of the investigation, the collection of the existing du ties would be impeded, and the revenue substantially injured. He (Mr. Smith) could not see how this could happ2n, Arco hislionourable Friend's motion Only.calted for an inquiry, net a repe,l 7 --and when it was understood that even if they entered upon this inquiry, nothing would be definitively arranged du / ring the present year. Trade would, therefore, in the interim flow through its accustomed channels.— 'The Honourable Gentleman also pointed out the in conveniences to which the Farmer would be exposed, if he was obliged to bring his salt to a given spot to !lave it mixed up according to the plan which had been talky! of, to exempt at from duty. The benefit to the country at large would be great, if the duties were at once repealed, for they had this peculiar hardship—that they fell With a fortyfold weight on, theyoor, in comparison with their operation on the other classes of the COMM unity. He would, therefore, give bis vote for the appointmeitt of a Committee. Lord EBRINGTON coneurred in the motion, from a conviction that the duties in question had an important operation on the means of subsiitetice of 's great part cit the Community. He should go into the Committee in the hope of getting rid cf a great portion of the present duties on salt. The experi. ment was ceitainly worth making, and would be .most gratefnuy received by the people at large— tHear, near).—Tbe Right Honourable Gentleman had talked of a Bill; which he would shortly intro dticeohat would aet as a:great bonus for the fisheries. Now he, as well Ws. Me Honourable Member near hint (Ur. Tref:lapse) bad received communications from persoas connected with the fisheries, who were of opinion (and they ought - to be the best judges) iliac What. the Right Honourable Gentleman called r a bonus, would, in fact, be a• material injury to their, trade. kle was certainly unprepaied to name asub- , stitute for the taz,though - he had no hesitation itr..aay brg, that there could not be a more hilarious one, or one more vitally affecting the situation of the poor. • Sir C. POLE bad also information from thUse eh rged in the fisheries, shrilly to 'Oat ,allittled to by too Noble Lout' Hs Hoped, bower, ibat *bee . • • . the R • iglie Honourable dentlemans . s 13 - ill was b • rought in. some clauses would be ittairted in-it to prevent the ill consequences which were antEciiiiited by the I parties for whose beiesfit it intended. Sir JOHN NEWPORT said, the motion titerelYl called for a Committee, and it was quite phi!' that if they meant to discuss the subject they had number COMM HOW rise, but by an examination before a Committee, could they undo staOtl the details of a question affecting so many biencees of eie people's industry? The arguments Aunt inconvenience, ' urged by the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite, would go egainst any general inquiry whatever— (Hear, hear). —Their course of proceeding WAS dif !trent on the question terpecting the Leather Trade, for there they went ism the Committee, obtained VA lunble information, and redressed some of the then existing abuses. All that wee at present called for was, the sort of inquiry to which Parliament always resuited on similar occasions, and un which they had already made a Report, which on a former occesion met with the sanction of the Right Honourable Gen tleman (the Chancellor of the Exchequer), who now, it appeared, turned round and took from his pucket A memori4l from an interested party, and at once be came a convert to its reasoning. Now, what was that reasoning ? Why it . was, plein terms; this, o We (the Memorielists) say o thet if yotorepe4l these du ties, greet numbers will let up in Ole same trade with Uip our monopoly will be injured, and we prey of you to interpose end secure it to us. Such WAS the document, and such its argument—( Mae, hear). lirre he could not but reprobate this practice of the Ofembers of G niernment suddenly wilting out theiree oarte pocket documents, end quoting them in debate, without giving any idea at the way in which they weir obtained. Why not, in common candour, it the Right Honourable Gentleman must ranssck the Treasury Bureau, have presented to the House. at the same time, the memosials that it was stated had been transmitted for the repeal rf the Tex ? His conduct would have been then somewhat open and correct. The Right Honourable Gentleman has said that there was no Petition presented against the Salt Dirties. Yes, there were, and they would be found on the table of the House, and memorialseo the same effect were said to have been pilei up in the Trea sury. The contrariety of sentiment among the fishery persons and agriculturists tip Para th s abject was, so far from being a 'pound of opposiion to going, into a Committee, the strongest reason in the world for going into it; for there alone could the truth be ascettained between all parties—(tieer, Aral, hear.) —The Right Hon Gentleman et the herd of the Board of Trade (Mr. Robinson) had said, that the effect of salt as a manure was doubtlul among agri tultatists. He (Sir John Newport) would only say, without pretending to much knowledge on such a subject, that he knew a part of a 'lawn near his ewa residence, where, twenty-five years ago, salt had been strewed, and the grass groon on that spot wes hive. riably cousumed by the sheep, while they would net touch a blede of that on the Adjoining spat, which was not so manured. This WAS a fact within his own knowledge ; and although the ground had not been turned up since the period to Which he alluded, the same distinction was, to the present hour, observable in its qUelity. It his Itlajeste, Government would fairly consider this question, they would do mere for I the Country than they could possibly accomplish by any issue of Exchequer Bills—in the one case they would be administering permanent relief. and in the other but tenworary. He would implore Ahem to pursue the wiser course, and not attempt to prop up a system that was in itself radically wro ige by any paltry or temper exped eat. (Cries of Hear, hear.) 11 the House did not fully exemiee this question, it would . nut perform its duty to the public. Let it at least chew an inclination to enter upon an examina tion, or do any thing but rejecte in liming., an inquiry which all must conscientiously feel to be necessary. It was nut by pulling from one's poCket a memorial of a party interested in upholding a monopoly, that the continuance of an oppressive tax could be made ' palatable to the people—it was not by an issue of Exchequer Bills to certain Corporations or Associa- . tions that the situation of the country could be ame liorated. No; such means would never reach tire object—it could only be reached by abridging the public expenditure, by cutting down the establish ments of the country to their proper station, by probing the whole system of the national expense to the bottom, and making it demonstratively plain to the people at large that Parliament had not counte nanced the issue of one penny beyond what was called for by the actual exigencies of the State— (Cries of Hear, hear). • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER begged to give a few words in ezpl 'nation. Since Ice had been at the Treasury Board no memotiel had been received for a tercel of this Tax; and though Petitions had been presented praying for an inquiry into these duties, there had not been any for its total repeal. Mr. ROBINSON explained that he never meant to discourage the use of Salt as mennre—all lie meant . to convey was, that the present price could not prevent its use; as, if it really were an object, it was still cheaper than any other article that could be used for the purpose. Mr. ROSE was of opinion that a substitute should . be named before they could enter upon so serious a consideration as the abolition of a revenue ie ‘1,510,000 a year. It was no valid objection to the Salt Tax to say, that it particularly fell on the poorer classes—so did every generally productive tat. What information could they get in a Committee that they had not alreitcly ? It was impossible, after the re peated diseUssions of this subject, that they could I,ope to elicit ; fresh matter in a Committee. The evil of these sort of inquiries WAS .this :—that during their operation the revenue became seriously injured from the * doubts that overhung the •speculatinns of thos whose intereets were to be in the end affected by the, consideration. So it was in this very case. The de ' fal.cation in the Past quarter's return of revenue was ,480,000, and .the manufacturers did not coeccal the cause of it; they did not hesitate to say, that they could not work freely, lentil the subject was brought to a, final issue OfIC way or another. Here WAS the mice:tits tax subsisting iu its present state fur 12 years, and itow . it was proposed to shake it off, without any suggestion for supplying the grea t d e fi c i t t hat would be thus occasioned in the revenue of the country. Here the Right. 'Hon. Gentleman declared, that frir. Pict's seaturoonts telative to these laws had been I incorrectly stated i that great gtaleiMait Wei PAW Iso sanguine an adirricate for their repeal is he had ISien represented. He Also denied the benef:r that it was imagined would mite to the igriailltural classes by this repeal. In Ireland the duty i.n salt WAS by 1M means what it was here, and was it ever iliecl it; that country for agricultural purposes? (64 Often," . fr om Sir Irvin Mcuport.) Well, he (fir. Rose) never heard so. Tnete was no duty on it in the Isle of Min, and the farmers there never used it ; nor when the tax was repe ;led at England, was it ever used for agricultural purposes. The fisheries were also gene. rally indifferent about i•--IT knew the Deep Sea Com pany (the only natama! one) 117 IS. As to the opera• tion of the tax upon t;:e poor generally. it was greatly exaggerated ; f‘r he enderatood that the ordinary. consumption of salt by a man, his wife, and three children, amounted to no more than twenty-cight sir twenty-nin e pounds in a year. S r THOMAS ACLAND warmly enforced the necessity of going into a Crirnmittee on this sub;ect, as they weicall agree'_, that if a substitts e could be found, the t* °ilea to be repealed-. It wit tutalt fraught wit 't Verity—it found its way into the hum blest cottage in-abe kingdom, and ttood in the w iy of the most piovident domestic arrangementt—such, for instance, AS the presuvation et mt.at. The difference of price, trifling as it appeared, was dteilise in its operation. The sari e opinion of the Pitt- 14,n:our :Able Gentleman's Bill for the relief • , 1 •f - it'• . trice had also been communicated to tom, t•• ! t . s was a strong reason for the appointment of •il \ ; mmltteeb whete the subject coulJ be calmly thscussed. There ou g ht to be no hesitation ab•ait going into a Com... mince, particularly as no imno diate step WA% to fol. low :nth a course, full time would be alloss4tl for all persons to be heard. At an events, they coital ar range at some definite period the getting rid of a tat so universally oppressive; and substituting in its place anoth:•r, either of a new character, or the revival of an old one—((Hear, Ilear.) Mr. IsROUGHAM wished to know if the date of the memorial referred to by the Right ll , m. Gavle: man was berate fir after the 13 h of Match t The C.l - I ANC EL . I,olt of t h e EXCHEQUER . replied, that it was dated on the fOtit of Apia. Mr. CA LC R A FT, in teply,anituadverted Wen,* upon the conduct of. the Board of Trade, 'uith re gard to the rneastire under consideration. It al Feared to him,. viat the application of halt it ifizeii inte reved persons to that Board, had more tati4 : let with his Majesty's Ministers, and esPeciaily ',.vtit the Rig!.t Honouiable Gentleman (Mr. Robtns.m), who pre sided at that Board, th tit the general voice of the country, or the Report of 4 Cumuli. tee of Olaf House. But if the private application of interested indiri. duds were t h us to be preferred to the pubic interest, nay, to the consistency of Ministers themselves ; where were the people to lonk for redress, or Icr the c tadist consideration of their case s+ He uustcal, ho.rever, that that House would tiot siircti;in such a principle, fur pr 'duce the impression to wleett it was but tzo likely to lead—(ifear, kar)—and,thei elute, he called upon the Haase to accede to the Commiuee, njlich he tilt it his ditty to move. It wat: to be recoilvcieti 'that he did not• propose tit.: repttal of t!.e tax tod.r •discussion ; that, on 01.t.c , .r.:;ary, lir a.intitted the Iquestion to be doubtful, art.! theteture, he soggested the pr o priety ()I referri!lg it to th e coudderatton of a Select Co - :lnk:et.. 13,:t the Right fio.tour.tble the Tteaserer ot . the Navy had distinctly stied, that it was desirable to eepe 11 the Tat attogetouri• if a convenient substitute for it could be deviaril.— Yet, most strange to tell, nortvitnstainding this dc -claratioii, the Right fill. Gentl:itian's cities,: of srt gument wail quite in favour of the t4Z. 4114 nes pro mised vote against a motion, which merely proposed to consider the proptiety of repealing this tal.--1. (Hear, , tear ) As to the argument of the Chancel• for of the Exchequer .upsni the re-eirictment of the &it Tax •in 1732, notwithstanding iti repeal about three years below, the Right 11. in, Gentlegoan - should consider the material d fference of circutottnitees be tween that period toil the present. as wed. with re. spect to chemical 46 to other points. But if seemed that the Right. Ilun. President at the . illard of Trade rogatd.:d the conneciion of salt litti sal-atus :sine, calomel or corrosive••sublimete, sts• mere trifling consideratioqa. Tile Right licin..G:ntiemao should,' however, le4 Vial •thqse , whisk he celled trifles, wete cornbinrd.with othsr matters sueationed in the couracot the debate - of such a, nature• as to de.' serve the consideration of that House. fileirdsror.) The Right filo. Gentleman should Asa rernatber, that .through such triff:s as the Tares twins Hair , Powder and At morial B..tarings, combined with others, the public revenue was raised to sc many millions.— But the fact was, that nothing could,b7 any cousides rate person, be deemed of a trifling character, !hick was productive of such effects as had been described in the course of the debate, which was distif,etty de precated by tht Report of a Committee of that House, consisting of Gentlemen wflo were now to ward to resist the repeal, d reduction of the Tax al luded to. The House then divided, when there appeared— For the previlus Qtp!stion 7J—.fig iust it 7j—M4.. jority for Ministers, J. Ate. D. BROWNS moved that s Select Committee be aft. puinfe,l to eunbklue the state of the Laws atli.ctios the Mentions of Repreientstiees in Parliament for Ireland.--Oriered. Sit J. MACKiNTO2sH renewed his not:ce of a nvnion tire to the Drone of the CrOMI, and of the Athousity, atm! api.o:trA Tuesday, the 1.3;4 of 'May, lot the consider+. ion et Lite question. Ni . r. E. Li ma: ram brought in a Bi:I, for which Le bad al:a:rle.l leave in ctne ea:ly ^irt of the caerirg, ter pceves.ting the i:ase and circulation :.t . Co i per L oca l r o i ent , • The Lill was rtal a I:r.t titne, and ordered to be read a teton d time on Wedge+day. ENT! IR :ID. Mr. W. SMITi 1 reque.vd to he informed by the Charie,V n y of the Lachequer wh,n hi intended to bring in tins ptsrnti•cd Hdl lit.g the i-s,e of Extents in Aid I Since he had I.iyiired brtorc re,pectioy this subject, the melauehoiy•eret t t tithe Chief Axon . " , 41 , atis wit OCCu.r.•., Vold he was &Woos of kifowt.ng %vile :ter the tneast.re might suffer any hurt ruption in consequence or it ? Thr suijeet was c,..e wticlssvould probably give rise to considerable dis‘tissitin ; it wooldi therefore, be desirable [last it should co .. on early in the Seas fon. The CHANCe.I.LO , R of the EXCIIFQIYER expressed his arsiety to have the measure brought torward as smut as possible. the unfortunate event to which the lionostahle Geist!entail al luded, and which Hwy all deplmei, had iu route .4t-gred rawded tht motion, but he shoull lose nu time in bringing It tursvards Air ARIiUTI - INO I' brought Hp bPrllt paps, relating to tbt/ progress of the (Jew Yo,t Aim—Laud ou the table. The House then adjoutord. In the Hollat Continods, on Thursday night, the Outmost. - Los of the EXCIIIQUItt vatesl,`• thm as ise riould •arn le find tiir par, the lintiteti I-sue 4 Ex.:depict sutouut al from pug to twos maims, zutilslltaTer:o . the only ix( been trt II e, produce , t uhly cm tom- ( Mr. CU against the ! the , necessity " preventing n rested err s Rigid 11 , tt. t incie.ssing th Cat of .11)91 Sarrelt de••ti free Jo of g FirAt laiCfr. On'? A gre r, star le tor fin . rh.i. 6000 t in Holl sod e With 2,800 ! kft of 'stirs , lugs per act, Cti•ely tO St resent distr , wilute it m advisable to to ,be ono and oti out a the st Admitting • wan, of du slone, ehr re so immense labixr every tense a Mau hagenieg to r 176 4 .1 we rep grad star art') annua fog country. asay so mat into es, one waulacturit aunt. The g sish:ngty lac :- state ;insult! s would tie tem t prAluce til iovpott with I LIISIMOL:td Vl I tore extend c d food wont At the rate c sits rc,{uisit 5,01:U Inns bog to At ru ise free of d Three Ileisci leached thu parpuse ; All a was ItAttid bier state b even cliscovel minulActure, el improving Rost edema gas. He 1111 kept the Mal Cases of salt thus they p dna labour yet annum, 1 source et us did, by goin Loped a nev dewed fro, mother way of every fern *Di he was of ISO head 0200. He cute a Propel all farms, wl moldered a of the Sale 1 mats, yet 3 thing eaperi was satisfied vscl from ou Alr., ROB slew of the a of the bait stitched the result irons i ed upon. I Tway was Mahe relati Ins not so. Mutation by he kn ew of ,FruPuted on west gener. salt fiatt bens spewed that by the 8.1% not tam tn, Was this Ali Salt 611 was it. The rej chieeted to I done to TC11( the greatest lies, and the %kb. The Clmist, ba t !Inch inloen t ie spoke, 'sect 111.1 t ptce cl crop of Twat sal anunimi; 1 : 0 0 inn s ,. : 41 Laid on M aterials us "Pie, as c 4 'hellc at n , doubt they h / 2 „ :4 i Put t u „t lt picture p as eDe tale, elstrugs 111 1 Wye to ei... ler 13111,, to ILO otittak t.: b 44