Star. — London, England, 1823-07-01 00:00:00

hit Ity 11-b- Lid ; the his he i ;ect‘ da.• u;.; 7W~ A.le ad on. crir e it. 'try, , to He CCI• :as. und ;li.dt ...IL - hir.s or t) co: - IMOD le to iini y ‘ •e It I tiie dot dine , <lv icgi r the ‘OO - twc: Qt C• e ol• with wkr ttllsl ist4o ICS, HOUSE OF .001EsIONS. 711 r, presente d a Petition feint certain Inhab itants of the Car.' Jr of St. Pauerate pealing for Itadicalileform.—Or a•el4. to Et anon the table. 1 o w n; pit IPPB - p -ajletition frostt the Shines • of • • aceig:: Scar against the'iteelpriscity of Duties ' to he Pri nt ' d ' yds. CURTEIS presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of p eo sel Hempstead against the Importation of Leekorn Strew ilats..-Tberetitien was ordered to be printed. CURT EIS then gave notice that he should, earl, 'suet •' hatroduce a Bill. to•alter the present Law relating? to the Di alog of 11 0 9-baSs• d, wn M. BARING presented & Petition ham Edward Tosen com phining of the •operatien of the inditieg Limikeopt Laws: i• Mr. JOHN SMITH supported the-Petition, which saes or derod to be printed. Mr. STUART WOItTLEY presented a- Petitien -from the stip-owners of Whitby, in the County of York, against the-Re- Derry of Duties NM—tit-tiered to be printed. The same Honourable Member presented a Petition - frotu the D r achers and Linen Manufacturers of Barnsley, in the County c f y o rk, g ait the imposition of a Dety on Yatn; also a Pe idea from t!le Flax-dressers of Knamsborough, of a direct!) , op pate nature, in favour of the Duty on the Importation of fo -7,4,2 y ar o,—Those Petitions were ordered to be printed. :dr. CHOKER preseuted an Account of the Pirate Vessels ,t,stroyed by his Majestr's cruizers.—Ordered to be laid upon ta ble and to he printed. Rlr STU.'IItT 1V(lItT LEY mooed the Order of the Day the further cot sid& ration of the Report of the Sale of Game. lee, for the put pas: of inovieg its postponement to neat Seniors. Ile e xpressed hims-lf skeirons that permission should Le given ,) every p et acii to kill teime on his own ground. Camel DAVIES disapproved of the Hal altogether. After a few words from Lord Datatrusse and Sir Joao s ol uar, th e further consideration of the Report was postponed to rids dsy three months. • rgrun. :JOORE presented a Petition from the Rib bon irearte - st of Coventry, praying for the Repeal of the Spital has Acts.—Ordered to lie upon the table. Mr. Serjesat ONSLOW gave notice that he would, early next Session, introduce a Rill for the Repeal of the Usury Laws. Mr. HOBHOUSE peesetted a Petition from the Inhabitants of St. eau's, Westminster, fraying for the repeal of the As sessed Taxes. Since putting his -question to the Chancellor of the Exchequer on a former night, relative to basement shop windows, he had found, on inquiry, that three windows of a shop, bell by one of his constituent', looking into an alley, were charged. 'Die CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, it did not s i v e ' 7 in what situation the windows Were, if they were shop windows; but these erobabiy were not Atop windows, al though on the basement story. Mr. W. SMITH presented a Petition from upwards of 6000 operative Mmufacturers of Norwich, in favour of the Cocuhl natien Act Repeal MIL Mr. P. MOORE said, he was convinced, if the House sat a month longer, he should have thousands of Petitions in favour of this Bill; he also e-as convinced, that if it was passed, it wonid cure all the evils of the country.. He felt that he could not pass the Bill without the aid of the Right klonourable Gen tlcnian opposite. His Bill was now dead fur the present Session, but though dead, still it should live--(A laugh).—lle would never lose sight of it, but would persevere till be had effected his object.—Petition received, and ordered to be printed. Sir J. MACKINTOSH said, he had h question to put, -on the subject of our Foreign Policy, and should have put it to-day, but fur the absence of the Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, and, in consequence of the absence of his Right Hon. Friend, he should postpone his question till to-tuorrew. PRIVATZ MADHOUSES. Mr. HUMS said, he held in his hand a Petition Tim a person named Milford, complaining of the conduct adopted towardtpatients •in Private Lunatic Asylims, and prayiq,iiiipiesogation„ HOBHOUSE wished to call the attention of the Government to thickisbjeti, aad to suggest the prouriety of-putting an end at once to these recep tacles. He would mention the name of an individual %Silo had large establishments-for lunatics, at Lloxtori. and Bethnal-green, and had many hundreds of indi-• viduals under his care. lie (14r..Hobhouselhad seen several individuals who had been in those.taceptacles, and they had stated to him various acts of cruelty and oppression to which they had been :Objected. Mr. BROUGHAM did not wishto oppose inquiry, or to punish misconduct if. it could be proved I blit he must, at the same time, in justice to the individual who had been alluded to,. say thut he had- alway.s maintained the highest character, andebereece he had seen that individual culled in aucrfxamieed in a Court. *bete he (gr. Brougham) practises, his de meanour had always been such as did him honour ; and where cities of lunacy occurred, and Mr. War., burton .was.not called in, his absence was generally a subject of comment on oneside or otber,as leasing the CtseinComplete. It ought to be recolletted, that the, testimony of such individuals as those named by , the hitaiber-.for .Westminster, ought to be received withthe greatest caution. A man might be.srlaciencir recovered to be discharged from a madhouse, and yet; might retain a feeling towards those tindei whose care he bad been during his malady, strongly impregnated .with prejudice and 1.110141C0. Mr. PEEL was convinced these reported abuses were gross exaggeration: l and that to do away private madhouses would be to open a door to abuses. Mr. BENNET wicked for inquiry. Mr. WYNN was convinced that there were greater abuses in hospitals than in these madhouses ; that to do.them away would be a public disadvantage. Mr. FIUKE wished to remind the Member for Winchelsea, that this Petition complained of no indi vidual by name. Mr. BROUGHAM was aware of this. He knew the Petition asked for inquiry —he was not against it. What he desired was, that inquiry should take place,. and that.modes of ascertaining what were, and what wev opt, private madhouses, should be made stronger than that which which 41t present existed. He was perstfaded that it was desirable to have these estao - on a large scale, as, by that means, thee was a greater probability of having -respectable indi viduals at their.head.--Tht Petition was then trzei vet/. F SCOTCIII JURIES. Mr. KENNEDY moved the order of the day for the thhd reading of the Scotch Juries' Bill. Lord 11.1.NN,IttiCi.opposed die motion. The got se' had, by agreeing to the motion fors secomiseadirsg, allowed-that some alteration ought to be made in the system of striking Juries in iScotland, but it had nqt" rieagfcl itself to the plan proposed by the finn.l4llecq; Octr, tbist ciwAsing the J uric by .l 1 . tie liable • Lard went cuter .the different grounds h 4 olojeotbils' to ltte 111, fie irtn.plored tbe Mouse mat-to wooden tbepropo.sed innovation- 'Me Bill contained such a ) /mut prauciple that it .opghtto b,e.resi t sted. 4e de- , sal Uralic opposed gll improvement ire the nal Law ol< Scotland, but the ifinovation ;contained in . measure he could new' sanction. fir. Q Bcßeft'Ot4flY observed, the objections nil uts L c ril Were of sucll a nature, that they TV tiniisd, in his opinion, to have laiga stateo *lose a Committee ; -and since he had km that its pass, he s O u ld not now t oph e ad-moose awn :dente, and attribute to the me asure a p ar ti cu l ar ' ashinh he had tbenio Opp ortualifetaa - Am:Secret ar y:PEEL 21214, :that :110. !VP. the• House would not yield to the awments just aged.by the_lifon. and Mamed Gentleman. The How wonld n;ier, be w convideed,iciOn a Mere petit technical: objection; pass a -13 ill• -wiiich they were convinced.was• 4 bad one. 'He rtially..ancliatin cerely-thought that the Bill wits a.bad one ;and. that, if it were passed, the Honourable . and Learned Gen tleman would him s elf •tre the -first who would ,wish to see it repealed; or at least amended. These were cpnseq nenc es sufficientl y pernicious which would result from taking the -Jurors in an alphabetical.list.- The first list , for instance, would inevitably containall" AbercrombYs--(A laugh).—.He -recommended the Honourable-and Learned. Gentleman, for the sake of his Own character, to give further • ccisideration to the measure (even if he was sure of a majority) before he pressed the third reading. Sir J. MACKINTOSH said; that he was most un feignedly surprised to find the Right Non. Cventle man, after admitting the necessity of the Bill upon principle, conic forward and oppose it at this stage, upon the chance of a possible inconvenience, as the Right Hon. Gentleman had said he.wisiied this,ques.;. tion not to be looked upon as a mere question of party politics,: be was confident the Committee had not the benefit of his understanding and authority. 11r. Secretary C4lOO/40 said, that he believed the Hon. and Learned Gentleman.had miitalten his Right Hon,_Triend. If -the impression on his mind : was Correct. fits IRigbt Hon. Friend agreed in the lie: cessity of removing a particular kind of selection: -But upon this the Hon. and Learnea 'Gentleman took' another step, and assumed that he hadeondemned all selection. It appeared to him, that'his Right•flon. :Friend had Only consented to part with the present system, because it was -faulty in theory, yet unim peachable in practice; if something could be snbsti tined in its place with a tolerable certainty of being successful in practice, at the same time that it was 'free from ally apparent theoretical imperfection. But be perfectly well remembered, in the former debate, that his Right Hon. Fiiend•ohjected most decidedly to the principle of ballot, and voted against it upon the second mailing.. It was, therefore, too much to expect, when the Bill• came for the third reading with 'the ballot, that he should give it his support. To the principle of ballot he (Mr. Secretary Canning) enter tained the same objection. Mr. KENNEDY supported the Bill. Mr. PEEL explained. After a few observations from, Mr. Faunas in sup port of the Bill, the House divided. The numbers were, For the third reading - - 60 Agaiiist it - 56 - —4 Majority The Bill was then - read a third time and passed. SCOTCH COMMISSARY COURTS. Upun re-admission to the Gallery, the Lord 'All• VOOATE was addressing the House upon the subject of . the Scotch Commissaries .Bill. The Learned Lord stated the number of those Courts to be 5111, and en.; teted into some details relative to the alterations re+ commended by the Commissioners of Inquiry. • When the question was put, that the Bill be iced a third time, Lord A. HAMILTIV observed, that the Learned Lord bad, for the first - time, Ott 'the third reading, given any informatitin ici the Hausecto the subject of the Bill. Hebelieied the Bill would experience the' same fate with another - Bill of the Learned -Ltird's; at the close of the lastlession, which, after having passed .that House; hsd, upon the motion of - it col-. league : that 43e.,Learned I.erd, been thrown out by the noitse of. Lords.' 'no . IsToble Lord then pro ceeded to:aigtie.it Mine length; against.;the provi sions of the ill, and state?," that' 134E/lad:l:teen given for the Office of j'roCiitittor -FiCitl e - ho nne-of :hese Courts, though the ConiMistiorters tad ..qoes tioned its Laity, and had bbjeCted strongly to the practice of ;Alin' , cifficei *belonging to the Courts of Justice.- He (I.ofd . A. - Hamilton) was-farourahle to the obiect that the Bill professed, though: by no means to the mode by which that object was -to be effected. From 1808 to 18$S no remedy had been. applied to the evils complained 40. Thee Bill went: to delegate the authority of the. House to certain: , persons in Scotland ; a prinCiple.:*:bith, he trusted, that House would net sanction, by its vote. 'The Court - of Session was to appoint fi ve .Sheriffs De, puce, and those Sheriffs were to draw up a table.o 4 - fees for their.owuCciurts. Why were not such f . P,.stated in the Bill, that it might be seen whether thel recommendation of the Commissioners had been coin 4, plied with ? The Bill gave the Court .of Session a power to legislate 'in .all time co.ning by Acts of Sederaut, than which nothing could be more odioel .to the people of Scotland. Re:vos.inctined to think the Bill would come to a premature death, from the circdmstance that there probablrwould not I.! astir. ficient number ot-Members to decide-upon the Bill 4 as it seemed likely—(tursoi/140fie-13/stsil)." that the House will be left to . you,-bir, and myself." The.vote he should give would be, that the .Bill.be not read ar third time, as it was an impooper Sill to-pass. Mr. K. DOUGLAS stated;.That the revenue mat I defrauded to a great extent-feast -the ineifisiencraixl ' extent of the Commissariat Courts. For fiscal regu lations these courts were almost wholly inoperative - . He was in favour of the Bill of the Learried:Lood. • Mr. K ENNEDT-thought that part of the Bill most objectionable that went to delegate such extensive powers, so the Court of Session. He would /*com mend that -the Bill be withdrawn for the -roast. The-LORD ADOOCATEreplied. Mr. .A•BERCKOM-BY was of opinion, -that the -Sheriff-Courts stiod equally in roped of peoision as ;the Commissariat. He trusted the Learoed Loodwoultl .not press the Bill in-the presentiSession.—lle iicinse_ divided--For the third reeding, 46—Against a, sl. The Sheriffs`.Coorts Bill, after ales, soordsifrorts the Loa AII)VOCATS and Loin A.III,4HOSIXOR, was ordered to be read a third time-that day-these months. ,- tortrr4amottli. "The Distilleries Blil : ii:esilicor The tti4tecitileint_tif the kat..— ~ , . . . _ , not th in it sterespry turnislt An iiiittne 1:1._ with a detail of its tbus4ef. All the .Amentirm..., which he wished to llitro4uic were; framed in-coneertl WW I the 1#1141.4s Witt totAte4o4 i n the the ;frills and: Scotch Voistilloriss; 4to4l9.balteil OW wo,ol4:o4Sirer all the purposes imis*ed.to be peorbsced kopeiseiai 'Mr. C. iftrteliMON oadersiooccAbis 41011)1- ;Wets had itext objearqUS to flgreiV4e-4 - 4t 1 0 1 % s' Eocise to lock up the room. itted. The CH ANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUE R would .fig sus • ‘4% Mr. • ymi r Ks UN hoped there wkil,d Dello ohjectiou to 'priding the new clanks. • ThsetilliNctLEOit-of -the tijoitmetit aki not.ece artyriitasna. for pritetiers the ci *uses , skit& beo,itianied with;eonntainCtliettliistillers. ;,• • Gentleman meant to withdraw the clause respect: . ing the shutting up of the worm, which,'he'Untei' stood, be-ruinous to the;Wrstillers. ~ tdr. WALLACE said, ell-thockauses i _vrerpt-that respoctiog .tlars worm, were drawn up with.* coo sent. of the. distillers. • Mr. HUME most strenuously recommended to Air: Majesty's'Ministers, the absolute necessity of intro ducing more effective tweasureslor the , prevention of smuggling. It was . idie to conceal: tiutcsmuggling was at this moment carried on to an.itnrnertsee;teut in _Englandr—Alienr). " Why, Sir," said the .Hon. Member, .1 to such an extent is smuggling carried, that every drop of spirits used in my ficuse tuned through that channel(Leaudkrughing). You may laugh, Geptlemen * but L assure yo l k' that-wiaat I s,tal,e is perfectly true, and it would be idle.to dog it j (goatinne4kjrgbter). furthpr, noxiCinly are the spirits which I use smuggled, but my poiket hang kerchiefs (fakinz an East •India - silk -handkerchief from Isis pocket), are also obtained in the same way: (Continued laughter)--and I *RI •venture W, *ad ! . that if each Hon. Member pLesentwi)l produce his hatulke.tclkief, he will chew birnielr equally culpable . with -myself;—(LotidiaurAter). Gentlemen, yOu' rhay laugh a s you Will; but it ni impossible-to-Conceal the fact. ...tt hese I feel it necessary to im *re : jesty's Ministers that they will devise r o mne efficient remedy . for this crying and wide spreading evil— (Laughing). For 140 most firmly maintain, that when once a man lends himself, in the sligh test degree, to the habit of smuggling, he becomes from-that mo ment not only exposed but strougly tompted _to the commission of the grossest an'd most flagrant crimes (Loud and costumed laughtei). If the Chancellor of the Exchequer does not make any proposition to that effect, I will introduce a clause to permit a free intercourse of spirits between Enghind and Scotland." The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, after the alarming declaration of the Honourable Member as to the dreadful consequences of smug. gling, and his confession that he himself was a smn,;- gler, he felt alarmed as to his fate—(Alaugh).—As to the production of hisforeign handkerchief, the Ho nourable Member ran a little danger, as, according to the law as it stood, any one of his Hon. Friends would be justified in taking it, and putting it in his own pocket. The Hon. Member, therefore, bad shewn an incautious degree of confidence in the ho nour of his neighbours—(A laugh).—As to the prin ciple, lie (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) agreed with the Honourable Gentleman, and saw no reason for permanently continuing the exclusion of Indian handkerchiefs, and he would dare say the time would come when they - should sec all this to rights. As to the spirit intercourse, the subject was so difficult, and it had presented itself so late in the Session, that he' had been unable to construct a measure which he could confidently recommend; and the Honourable Member would be aware, that a measure not *ell digested Would be unjust to all parties, and danger ous to the immense revenue concerned. In the next Session he hoped to be able to propose a measure. The Bill for a spirit intercourse between Scotland and Ireland was introduced as a measure of necessity. • Mr. HUME, after this candid explanation, said he should not propose the.clause he had mentioned, in the confidence that in the next Session something would be done. • Sir R. FERGUSON suggested that a short time should •be allowed before the spirit intercourse of Ire land and Scotland took effect, as the Scots Distiller had no stock of spirits on hand, while the Iri . sh Dis tiller, who had the Firivilege.of bending spirits, had a large stock. Mr. WALL,AcE said, the Irish Distiller was quite as much afraid of •tlioScots as the Scots of the Irish. liir.W.SMlTklsaid,tbe7Ppirit,Lawshad occasioned ! a -4011Staat struggle between the Scotch and Irish Distillers and she Revenue, which bad been produc4 Live of a. constant system of fraud. - All that was now desired was, to put the Distillers in the three coun= tries 14) 4 0 -the. wile footing, as the English Distillate were willing to take their chance against the advan tages pf the other two. .Sir .R. FERGUSON said, the Scotch Distillers' were willing to the shutting up of the warm, if it was . not found to deteriorate the spirit. Mr. O. BENNAT thought the people had as good a right to drink spirit!, if they pleased, as any Member had to drink wine. Mr. HUME claimed for *Wand the same piivi lege of exporting her spirits to England. at Ireland had. The chums were then agreed to, and the Bill was ordered to.he reported to-morrow. aßtrtsrl ROMAN CATH OLICS. Mr.:6olll.lii/EN moved the third leading of the Irish Insurrection Bill. . . Lord NUG - F i blT. hoped the Eight Hon. Gentleman would give.,precedence to the Bills which he had brought forward for the relief of the British Roman Catholics, which bad been postponed so frequently. Mr.tiOULBURN Said, the yer,y delay in passing this Bill bad been productive of much evil in the pre , sent state of Irelitid. The Elective Franchise Bill was recommitted: * . BANKES objected to efing any more -poli tical power to persims professing- the Catholic 'relit gion. . He contended, that after the passing of th* Act they Could.not avoid giving the Catholics seats ill Parliament, as well as,t9 open all offices to ;bent He had no hesitation in giving the Bill his most de cided negative. Istr.ll.-CAlRNEY.supposted the Bill. He.had no apprehension of any additional power which this Bill' would throw into the !triads of the Catholics. x - ,AT.,p 15,c4a, supported .this Bill ; bat de • • clared_he would not go ode step further. M. JOHN SMITH also supported the 13irL mole respectable body than the. fitiglisli Catholic; pert latllT.Oßigtd. *ir• Sfr - retarY -44 46% 1 u * the coucession new afiltqd for Ilms Anglish Catholics might safely be ado milted. The present question divided itself 'lobs two parts. The first, whether The tooeessiae could be s tis*a Joie 6aGot; to xis! veligiess thy L&w ses§ablisjeed and next, whether it s.esObelpross leiiir.solity. to the' .:. State ? He thought *nd therefore he not cousi . . a - -r •~~►~~~~ feu-. General GA Sisb(slityfe. findo**mi. Catholic came has lost_su. able an advocate ; for no one could fail to see, - that , t)r the:yeast the Right could Aejt aisow. adow. t treiots ilpysallipi as. • edginHeg liosiurik4mg feug )ash asessuerea bcould see no necessity for the ignenelve:“the Catholics ad not asked . tlt,ie* n single on ibe sdbiett . . • ari:LUSl4DierKiblistsaported the MTh 'He five: sidczed all disabilities on the greartd eif - religiepe oqi mirins-assnitinit` and iMpolitic, Ail: increase the Aturibir.of , sectariaeionst**strerigthen the , Esta,lished.Rllisien. • • 'Lerd , l3fliglNG stipportedibt*l.: . • • GOOCII cornmdered , tile restri,stiens as naces!; sary, inasmuch as .the still. continued what ' they were, and would, aa was their duty, ulway,s.he, anziously,3liae to. 'Daige cisFertssVharever they-cq old Mr. BAbliellS, .joani“.saitioshat by supporting the IBM they were dropping-the-key-stone into an imper fectare-(ldeav).-rIEW Hon. Me/Tiber strongly stsp ported. doe.metieu. • • . Mr. Niira sigut if y / pprted . • gr. .41% gRELp. objected to Alin Btll t as goidg . itriiffectthe f flintrarirerital article of theiThion bit:Veen cottitiy 'See/land ; and, if adopted, mist . lead to further: cancessioas; ~1 Mr. BUTTERWORTH:decIared, that .he etiald• • not consent to the !Denture then before the'llonee..— If Parhanse% sgrstured the boon - now. galled far, it would be the trst step towards making still greater concessions to the Catholics They would not rest satisfied here, but would demand still greater privi leges—illear).—To prove the truth of this assertion, he need only refer to the fact, that when the elective franchise was extended to the Catholics uf Ireland they soon began to claim more extensive privileges— (Hear).—He could not agree that those rights ton.; templated br the 13111 should be granted to'them, bew cause he considered the principles of the Catholics not to have undergone any change. The fears which were formerly entertained of the Catholics were as well founded now as they ever were. The samerin• tolerant spirit still' prevailed amongst that sect— (Hear).—So much were the intrigue' of particular orders among them dreaded, that the Jesuits' had been suppressed in every part of Europe. In the late settlement of the kingdom of the Netherlands, the Monarch wished to extend the privileges of the Pro testants; but the CathOlic Bishops complained asairist the adoption of any-Such' metiure, as trentbingoi the prerogatives attached to ;their religion. Has.wis a sincere friend to religious:freedom, end . therefore he opposed this Bill- 7 (year,,oad Mr. H 4114 Lose to protes . t t j 4 the strongest manger ? agairist the siteciri of argument made use of by Hon. Gentleman who had Pit - tat down. Ruch ob 'Serrations were unfit for any man to make ; bat as the lion. Gentleman was-himself a sectarian, and en joyed all the benefits of toleration, he was doubly criminal in harbouring sentiments so intolerant. If an individual connected with the Established Church made use of language of that description, there would be some excuse for him ; but when it was held by a sectarian—by. oae whom the law, in a truly tolerant spirit, protected; it was perfectly inexcusable .(licar). _The ,Gentleman had expressed his dread of %he . Jesuits ; but he would tell the House. that there wag a class if o. l l l:Otestant-Seicits"—(Hear, hea t ), whO *ere much more tote feared--(Hear).— 'The-Church Establishment had much greater reason to apprehend danger from the sect to which the Ho nourable Gentleman belonged than from the Catho lics—(clear). There was not a point that could be favourable to their interest, or by which they thought they could undermine the Established Church (not withstanding all their declarations of devotion to it), that they did not, most assiduously, endeavour to gain (Hear, hear). ',He looked upon the Methodists to be the Jesuits, of all others, from whom the Church of England had most to apprehenciHHear). • It was quite clear to him, from tbe observationi made by the Hon. Gentleman, thatit was impossible that he could have . a particle of tolerant spirit in ibis breast (Order!) The whole.9f his speech breathed nothing but Perseetant. Ire again as serted , that the Govern ment ought i o . loolc sitter the Methodists, instead of the Catholics—(Hear, hear). B.c-the last fifty years they had shewn themselves most •anxious to make proselytes, and most assiduous in their hostility to re ligious liberty ; and he must say that he believed no Roman Catholic' had ever expressed such intolerant ()Onions as the Hneourrible' entleman had uttered dint night—(Near, hear). ••. . Mr. BUTTERWORTH 'said, there was no neces sity for him to defend himself against the attack of the Hon. Member. The sect to which he belonged was highly complimented by the censure of a , gentls.4l:ln who had defended Carl:lei principles in tIS Reuse. Mr. HUME said, if the Hon. Meriiher attended to facts, it-would be much better. He never had de fended .Mr. Carlile's principks.—The statement was not true—(,Jar, hear). . The CHAIRMAN hoped the 14031. Gentleraan would not indulge in personal stbiervations. Mr. H UM X:--Iftht Hon. Gentle nsan stands up and asserts that which , is not true, I have a right to contra dict it. I assert that the Hon. Member as made :-.n ,tistack on my.pelsonal.conduct which is npt true. , . I,9ed,HO.tiENT replied. 11,e3aiit; that the appte lierisions w ith respect to Jetpits. ieeie tilifouVideA, ;there were ' not now. three4esults'in fhe cobntry. ' • The gallery Watthen cleared fora-divi s ion.—For the Bill 89 —Agai !Ist it .80--3•Maintity 59. : On the Order of the Day fpr the third reading of .the.lFish Insurrection Act, • Air. BENNET protested against the -Mil ; bat et that hotr would: net detain the *wee by .string it knob iotp the aphisc!. Colorer TRENCH defended thp 13411: ' *Mr. DR Si6fAtil Said, that the renewal of the Bilt`aasii prod of its inefficacy. The Bid had been edit eprtistitelor and, had increased the evils It %Tat PrPirt!e4.4? l!n l FdY., The Bill wad then read a third dint aria p3ased. • f; ' The thiritefal Oaths BMlwas ricoasadated, ift3 the itevc:; ;o.l'o to be receixed : thil.447? TtIZ XPIGAI • The Cl-1.415. CELLO /1. of the EX . CIIWIIIt rnoleSls.3 the Annuity of 41460, t reated •to the lateMtil Of .4. iiinseirtt, by the kid) 4'. 4 4i4P 2 k0. 1 . 093414 hfPPOß4VirtriPitir vii -s_ttpt,.. and 14e next success(); to tlif title : F test) ut it a the illeiotot eirOcitsi lift 6e teovivettmaranswoc. 71" It 0014.4.ffifiZ,L1 4 PFIAPVI4i4EIiI44 RfO .the ' a: Thin a Cloth. • , .I . ; 1