Star. — London, England, 1810-04-14 00:00:00

NI% PARLIJIMEIVT4Rr PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, APRIL is. TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST-INDIA STOCK. LADIES AND GENTILILIAZII, I TAKE the liberty of acquainting you that it is my intention, at a future opportunity, to offer myself to your notice as a Candidate for a Seat in the Direction. Having been professionally bred in your regular Naval Ser *lee, in which I spent twenty-five years of my life, I trust that my acquaintance with this department will justify me in presuming to solicit the honour of your Votes and Interest, to plane me in this important situation, assuring you that if I should be so fortunate asio become the object of your choice, my best amnions shall he - employed to promote your interest. 1 have the honour to be, with great respects, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your most obedient humble Servant, 12, Lower Berkeley-street, JOSEPH DORIN. April 12, 1810. Counsel were heard on the Roxburgh Appeal—to be further beard on Monday. The Local Militia Amendment Bill was brought up from the Commons, and on the motion of Lord LIVERPOOL read a first time, and ordered to be printed. A number of Private Bills were also brought up from the Com mons, and read a first time. Lord LAUDERDALE gave notice, that on Monday next 11^. should call the attention of their Lordships to a Standing Order of that House of May 2,1794, in which he should propose some al teration.—• Adjourned till to-morrow. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Mr. WOODFORD, from the Exchequer, presented an account of the surplus of the Consolidated Fund.—Ordered to lie on the Sable. On the second reading of the Yarmouth Water-works Bill, Mr. HARBORD moved as an Amendment, that it should be read a second time on that day six months. 'l'he amendment was car ried without a division. Sir S. R OMILLY gave notice, that on Monday he would move . for the release of Mr. Gale Jones. Lord COCHRANE gave notice, that on Monday he would move that certain Papers relating to the Navy should be referred to a Committee of the whole House. The Report of the Highway Robbery Bill was brought up, and odered to be taken into further consideration that day 3 weeks. On the motion of Mr. ROSE, a copy of the observations of the Surgeon-General on the sth Report of the Commissioners of Mi litary inquiry, and a letter to Francis Knight, Esq. were ordered to be laid before the House. IRISH CATHOLICS. Mr. ORA TTAN gave notice of a motion for Monday the 16th Instant, in favour of the Catholics of Ireland. I-lis arguments would be grounded on two grand points, first on the justice of their claims to those privileges enjoyed by their fellow subjects ; and secondly, on the propriety of granting the King a vets to forbid the inauguration of their Bishops by any lot (Agri power. SOUTII LONDON WATER-WORKS. Mr. H. SUMNER brought up the Report of the Committee on the South London Water-works. M. H. MARTIN opposed the Bill, on the grounds that it in fringed the rights of another Company established for a similar purpose ; and against which no complaint had been made. He thought the Bill called on the House to violate every principle of good faith ; for if the Lambeth Cumpany,estab!ished in 1785, had performed what they undertook to do, the House could not be justified in depriving them of the advantages they at present en joyed. lie concluded, offering to move an amendment on the objectionable clause. On the suggestion of the SPEAKER, he deferred his motion till the Bill had gained a more advanced stage, it being understood that the Bill was introduced solely for the purpose of enacting the clause in question. It was agreed that the debate should take place on the further consideration of the Report. Mr. MARTIN then moved, that the further consideration of the Report should be postponed to that day six months. Mr. H. SUMNER contended that the Company alluded to had abused their power by keeping persors without water for eight or nine years, because coming into houses which had been inhabited by tenants not of a very honourable description, they would not pay the arrears of the former inhaL•!ants. Sir THOMAS TURTON opposed the taking of the Report into consideration. A division took place, when the numbers were— For the Amendment o—Against it 22. TLe Bill was of course thrown out. SECURITIES FOR PLACES OF TRUST. Mr. CALCRAF I', in consequence of the accusa tion made against him on Thursday, had given no tice that he would move for certain papers on the sub ject. He had looked over the instructions, but could not rind any thing in them that seemed to apply to himself; but as he might have overlooked them, he should move for an extract of that part which was considered as bearing on his case. He begged to ask the Hon. Gentleman opposite, and the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether, on further inquiry, they had found that Mr. Ridge did not give securities for the oflicr he held under Lord Moira ? He would also move for the dates of the securities which Mr. Ridge had given at any time. Did he renew his securities on a new Master of the Ordnance Board being ap pointed ? Those given under a former Master ceased to be binding on Lord Chatham's being placed at the head of the Board, it being the practice to renew them under every new Master. He wished those questions to he answered ; till they were, he would trouble the House no farther. If, however, the re turns made were not satisfactory, he should feel it a duty he owed to himself, and to the Gentlemen with whom he had acted, two of whom he should state were still of that Board, to take some further step on the occasion. lie concluded by moving for such ex tracts floe) the instructions to the Board of Ordnance as relate to the taking of securities for the office of agent to the artillery. Mr. ASHLEY COOPER stated, that although there was no insertion in the instructions, still it was the universal practice to demand securities from all Agents, through whose hands the public money went. Independent of all provision or enactment, the prin ciple was itself conclusive. In answer to the ques tions of the Henourable Gentleman, he had to state, that the bond in the case of Mr. Ridge was made out, hut was not executed by that Gentleman. Mr. CALCRA FT asked across the table whether it eras executed by his sureties ? Mr. COOPER. Yes; it was executed by his sure ties.—(Lertd rt 7 of Hear, hear.) —With r; .pest to he must say, that h e did not :lc otl;ct' qtr:tik :: 1 7 siiesce in the con:lusion, that securities were not re newed in ca l / 4 e of a chai.ge in the department. The secin - ity wac net to the person at the head o f t h e • D:Lird, but to the King. There was one topic intro duced by t h e I Gentleman (Mr. Cidcraft) to which he felt it incumbent to advert. Ile had been charged with r - night:4 krwaid against th a t Gentle ',e luau, an accoeizien for his conduct in the case of Mr. R 4 4 ;e. lie had gene no slich thins, but when his own character was implicated in censure on a& count of Mr. Hunt's defalcation, surely it was natu , ral btr him to turn tilen his accuser and say, even in yoor oen :eiiiiinistration, you yourself have been gii:lty of the very omissien, tor which you now so loudly proclaim that lam culpable. Of that omis. s e al i e admin;stration he would beg to recal :he 'a:ter:Von of the lon. GeNleman (Mr. Calcieft), to the case of Mr. Hopkinson, whO also was an age nt , SIR FRANCIS BURDETT. I and by whom no security was given, though his ap- The SS PEAKER acquainted' the House that he point ment took place during the administration of that ' had received a letter signed Francis Burdett, on which Hon. Gentleman. he wished to know the pleasure of the House. On a Mr. CALCRAFT.—" This is altogether a new cry of Read! Read!. he read as follows : charge, but nave no doubt it stands upon equally g , To the Right Hon. CHARLES ABBOTT, Speaker of the as strong grounds as that of Mr. Ridge, which the HORS! of Commons. confession of the Right Honourable Gentleman (Mr. .. sot—you having on cr about the 9th day of April Instant' Cooper) has confuted almost as quickly as he utter- . as Speaker of the House of Commons, forcibly broke and entered ed it. Let those Gentlemen be brought to the bar. the dwelling-house of me, the undersigned Sir Francis Burdett; Lit the House be put in possession of the fullest evi- situate in Piccadilly, in the parish of St. lames, Westesinster, dence upon the subject, and I feel sincerely confident that such accusations must recoil upon those who , in the county of Middlesex ; and having also, on the said lath day .f April, caused me to be apprehended, and unlawfully corm have so indirectly advanced them. But allowing mined to a certain prison called Ills Majesty's Tower of London, we were guilty, can there be an excuse for the o fences of those who perpetuate the abuse until the . and to be there imprisoned, and as yet kept and detained in pri son there, without any reasonable or probable cause whatever.— countrr is made to feel the actual loss and evil ?--- Ido therefore, according to the form of the Statute in such case Will the country think it receives a just performance made and provided, hereby give you notice, that, I shall, at or of duty from those for whose services large salaries soon after the expiration of one calendar month, from the time o f are paid to them, merely, because when charged with your being served with this notice, cause a bill to be filed against a dereliction of their trust, they think they have the power or the opportunity to recriminate s . Reerlmi- you in his Majesty's Court of King's Bench at Westminster, and nation is no defence—(Hear, hear.) If teir charges a writ of summons to be thereupon sued out of his Majesty's said 1 Court of King's Bench at Westminster against you, at my suit, i are well founded, let them bring them directly in a for the said trespass and false imprisonment, and shall proceed Parliamentary shape ; and if we are guilty, let us be against you thereupon according to law. ... subjected to that merited censure under which the ,_ ~ 1 arn, &c. " TRARCIS BURDETT. present Board so very justly suffers. It is quite ridi- i culous to make a parallel between the cases Of Mr. „ Dated the 12th day of Aprl, 1810," and endorsed by Jon x Elam, Gray's Inn-square. , 1 Ridge and Mr. Hunt, evea if the accusation against 1 me in respect to the . The SPEAKER said it was at the option of the former was true ; but as it is ' most unfounded, even by the admission of him, yvho House whether the letter should be' catered on the has made it, I must say it is insulting the public, which Journals. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER has been robbed to a large amount, to distract the ! course of public justice by the introduction of uncon- conceived nothing could be done with the paper in netted subjects." i the present stage, but to enter it on the Journals of the Mr. CHARLES LONG admitted that recrimina- House. tion was not a good set off, and constituted a miser- ' Mr. PONSONBY thought that the letter ought to able defence ; but when the Honourable Gentleman, lie upon the Journals. in the pomp of o ffi cial superiority, denounced his suc. I Mr. WHITBREAD was of the same opinion, cessors, it was natural for them to retort and try him ,i The letter contained nothing that could make it unfit' by his own acts. If omissions of a similar nature to be received ; and it might be the ground of great could be laid to his charge, it was impossible iii the questions hereafter to be tried. overbearing triumph that he was inflicting, that flesh The letter was then ordered to be inserted on the and blood (A laugh) could rest silent, and with the Journals. knowledge they had of some of his own omissions, I BILL FOR REGULATING SECURITIES. 1 not illustrate them. I Mr. A. COOPER thought the House would have no objection ' Sir JOHN NEWPORT stated, as the characteris- 1 to the moticn he was about to make. He then moved for leave to bring in a Bill for regulating the Securities given by persons tic distinction of the present Ministers, particularly of ;holding Places of Trust, for the Performance of the Duties of the Chancellor of the Exchequer, that for every grie- their Offices. vance complained of—for every act of misgovern- Mr. HORNER thought the Hon. Gentleman ought to have stated the grounds on which he wished for leave to bring in the mein and mistake—fur every measure of policy which Bill. If, whenever a new instance of delinquency were discover had bequeathed calamity and ruin to the country— ed, a Bill was to be brought in to prevent the like occurring each the delinq uent might constantly escape with impurity, the only justification was the pother and capacity to aga in, recriminate. What had the country to do with their p rove Bill would nug atory as the last, and thus they might go on ad infiniturer. bickerings and recriminations ? If any charge or ac- cusation could be brought against their opponents, The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER was of opinion, that all errors would be corrected by this Bin, and that it was a mode svo u o l df proceed i ng. a better method to why not bring them ? To insinuate them, and not most W p h A u I l e : N o n; e l, and l operativeconceived it venture to arraign those whom the Ministers were anxious to depreciate, was, in his opinion, instead of a address his Majesty for the removal of all Officer guilty of default in their duty; this was not a nugatory, but the only real defence for their own misdeeds, an aggravation of method of preventing negliger.ce. their offence, inasmuch as they kept such charges se- Sir 1. NEWPORT was of opinion, that the true way of pre creted, merely as an apology for their own derelictions. .. venting future transgressions would be by punishing the past.— The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER i ( Hear, le T !f—lf failure should take place in consequence of the • want of a bond, they who did not exact that bond of course should assured the Right Honourable Gentleman opposite, I stand in it, place ;it was rather a curious circumstance, he thought, that nothing was more foreign from his intention, , that law makers should be the first law breakers. than to build a character for his administration upon I Mr. WARD said, the only question was, tihetiter:itcturroittiil,. it. Inot proud the basis of their fame. He should feel not in h a ve te nta-glii•rcttisg te n denc y to enforce the enterin g into grant of the office ? the conviction that he stood high in the public esti- Nothing had been said against the efficacy of such a provision. mation, merely because he stood a little higher than Mr. ALEXANDER BARING said a few words. • them—(Hear, hear.) There could be nothing in the Mr. WILBERFORCEcouId have no objection to inthe bringin instructions of Charles the Second which were given in of the Bill. Some improvements might hr male ' nuttec—a clause, for instance, making it inspereive to pi oduce to the Clerk of the Ordnance relating to the case of the bond executed within a reasonable time at the I.•r..asury. • agents, because no such office existed at the time such Leave was then given to bring in the Bill. instructions were originally drawn out ; but he would 111P4I TITHES. contend, that the subsequent practice was as conclu- Mr. PARNELL rose to submit a motion for a sive as if it was ingrafted in them. With respect to Committee to inquire into the mode of collecting recrimination, he had to observe, that in the present I tythes in Ireland, with a view to remedy the present instance the only attempt of his Honourable Friend I inconvenience and oppression resulting from the sys was to reduce them from their vaunted elevation too tem. In bringing forward a motion, the object of the mere level of fallible beings. There was no ac- ! which was to improve the state of Ireland, and to cusation brought against them ; but surely when they ; conciliate the minds of the people, he thooeht he had ventured to arraign others for misconduct, of which 1 a strong claim upon the attention of the House, and they themselves were guilty, it was not too much i that claim must be considered as still so-onger, when to refresh their recollection with the facts, and from , Gentlemen adverted to the disappointment under their own sheaving to argue, that in the Iff months j which the minds of the people of Ireland laboured that they were in office they did contrive to colleen- i from the new obstacle that arose to Cathol c emanci trate all the abuses of the '2O years preceding. j potion. Under these circumstances, he hoped the Mr. PONSONBY.--“ The Right Honourable i House would see the propriety of acceding to this Gentleman has assumed, that the merits of his Ad- measore, so well calculated to conciliate where con ministration are so transcendant as neither to require j ciliation was so necessary. That the commutation of foil nor contrast. He has presumed that the results ; tythes would greatly ameliorate the condition of the of his Government and the interests of the country ' people of Ireland, no one could doubt who was every day give an additional value to his services and , thoroughly acquainted with the subj ec t. H e t h en a splendour to his Mi n i s t r y. That th e hi g h er h e ; stated what had passed upon this s ubj ec t b e f ore .— lifts himself in office, th e m ore di gn ifi e d h e becomes 1 The Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Perceval) opposite in reputation, and that the country accords with the ; had been sensible of the evil, and had endeavoured to panegyric which lie has so modestly pronounced ' find out a remedy, but at length abandoned the mat himself. But it is not to his talents his praises are ter as impracticable. After this he had himself sub restricted. No ! his clisrity for the misdeeds of his ; mined a motion last Session, which, (he thought, opponents—his compassion for their defects form no : might have been agreed to. It had been negatived. inconsiderable share of his own eulogium. Forsooth, j however, on the ground that the House had out suf he said, he never built his reputation 'spoil any rccri- , ficient information on the subject. The object of the mutating attack upon his political opponents. In- , motion he was now about to submit, was to procure deed, one is at it loss which most to admire, the mu- : the necessary information. He did not agree with dcsty with which he speaks of his own exploits, or the the Right Hon. Gentleman, teat there was no remedy compassion Nrhich he kindly extends to cur demerits. :, applicable to the case. But in any view inquiry was Let him allow me to protest against his generous proper, as it would remove the doubt in one Way or condescension. Let me hope to impress upon him . another. He would not enter at large into the toes that we seek no such responsibility far our public : lion of the effect of the tythe system, bat only men conduct. If we have acted impropeily—ifthe corn. • tion some circumstances which rendered its pressure try has cutlet-tol in its interests by Our offences—if we peculiarly severe in Ireland.- The population of ire have afforded illustrations of dereliction of ditty aod ' land he took at five millions Of these four millions breeches of trust, in Goo's name, let the Chancel:oe were Catholics—tlee half of the other million were of the Excheqiier recollect t!:e paramount duty he protestants, dissenters, or quakers ; sj) tl t • - to one J parts owes the count: y, nod bring us to trial for oar mis- out of ten of the population had to pay tythes to duds—( Hear, hear.) For such attacks we ate pr;•.. clergymen whom they did not attend for religions pared ; unequivocally brought forward we mast be instruction, besides what they paid to their own grateful. The acrimony, the violence, the political clergy. He did not mean to propose that Ireland ; asperity of the Right H o n oura bl e G ent l eman we are should be relieved from the tythe system ; all he not inclined to fear, but Ido be , s s , leave to p ro t est wi s h e d was , that the House should i nqii i re w h et h er against and deprecate as the most disheartening of all it was possible to devise a pl an by w hi c h t h ey m i g h t vis;tations—their comm en d at i on an d co m passion. " be contributed in a more easy Manner. The meet- Mr. CALC RAFT, in a most animated manner, ings for relief in this respect were not all composed ' retorted eroa die Chancellor of the Exchequer's af- ,of catholics. The protestants, and even the l • C ero fected indulgence to grant the papers he sought.— - themselves, were friendly to some change. Another ' Really, one would have thought that he carried the peculiarity in Ireland was, that the poorest man was House of Commons in his pocket. He would tell forced to be a landholder. The population was so him that he sought them not as a matter of favour, large in proportion to the capital, that the labourer but as a matter of zight. He had been accused, and could get no regular employment to enable him to • as a Member of Parliament he insisted upon their live, as in this country, independent of holding land. production. He had ho wish to be under a cloud, ,' The competition, for whatever labour the capital or to he placed in the list of public delinquents. He I could maintain, was so great, that the wages were might be refused by Ministerial Majorities, but lucki- ! too small to support a labourer and his family, The 1 y what pas.:ed within these walls still found their way consequence of their holding, land was, that the poor to the public—(Hear, Hear. ..---[The Papers werel est of the people were subject to tythes that t ( then moved for, and agreed , obe i rodticed.] clergy were supported by persons so poor, that in this country therwoourbe estittA to Parlhsiisisitythes.ei.e-lins-et h U iu nd t 7 th th es e h se im c se irc lf u , ms au t d antes there h w e aswaus perpetual y su a nc d e es w eri hi p t u r n en u d f er p e e d rsu it u n s e n c u es t s , : e rl y for ser . u h: , resistance score of humanity.. The poor people same remedy against oppression as in th h • where it was customary to meet a spirit of ' by calling upon the clergyman to draw But in Ireland, it' three, or some small number did this, it was construed into a conspiracy, and co me . quently it was hardly ever d i o tl n aw e teo . ult l dh f ehe no a th s i u n ffi g c s t h w o u u e ld uu te trie d s on in e th th an is r t e o w a e s e s t i , m i laws of Lie ground for this motion. To limit the tythes on flax in Ireland to five shillings on the acre, as in this country, would he a great object. need not enter into a detail of the hardships which took place in consequence of the syste m of c::: . .. letting tithes , as they were notorious.—The grna , body of the clergy deserved praise rather a,n 4 harm even en bu t a t u he in H di o r u id sc ua \vou c i l d er c g o y n zu sl a d u er / g iu r t i , how m atc h where those who paid tithes were so numerous and i poor. This by the system was admitted to be a bad I mode of culture. . u f s ti l i Te x w a h t i i st o h n cant r ui a nt iti:d.yu,sh when xhtqeruenmotteehldey injuriousthe ß al t a i c u t was ta us : authorit y of land all intercourse with America prevented, depend ed' on • Ireland for a supply of grain ; from which 800,000 quarters had been imported. It. was exceed. ingly impolitic, therefore, to check the agriculture of Ireland. He had before stated, that he thought :;. wanted best vaetli eidd n n o mo t .at t s o ncl ped inw l cip l ier e ydg, h e i t m ha self tth t e o any himself rteumae idl yy. parti c ular ftr vvdillea p t ln. evilalie al , ietl e w pn h dlot i ir c drp h enmns s eoe h . tdo remedy cldetoldut gpledge appear ehbeeimofuos b lued e lnf s nd t efctoarl the c giveu . 1 ei l m n a v te t i i g ui d . h t t h t o e b l u a ot lon h c at u tsh e r pi ll w i oo edd p m ne r tli g i b i u g :i n hht l i vt i t t li m i:aind e ni n gr etcicoatnr equivalent.ep, t haaytamt the eehu s a mei Several e o f rv b ue j e iruta c i ltmt the at t cnis.aittb a h prese n t t n alul y de. .u,i p i l cal a ess n rtg , touy y t s e islh t ee been proposed; one he believed by Mr. Pitt,for the sale k s e w n o a u d l v d an n t o a t ge an n sw f etrh,eansppthoretuGnietnytlnfe m t of e tythes. thadhes purchasin .n g o t tT h t e ha i i r quit rents. His wish was that the iplan should be as simple as possible. The first step ihe w(iuld recommend would be to ascertain the value of the livings. This might easily be done, as there were precedents to gnide them. As to the amount paid for them at present, he had no j data to go upon ; but he calculated the tythes paid !at £.500,000, which would be the sum t o b e .pro . %ruled in lieu of the tythes. To prevent the clergy. ‘ man from being a sufferer by the depreciation of mo ney, he proposed the average price of grain as the standard of payment, which would carry the provi sion beyond the mark at present. The average, under the present circumstances, would be tco much in fa vour of the Clergyman, as the high price of grain was rot the natural price ; but one cawed by the de . preciation of the currency from 16 to 20 per cent. as would appear from the Report of a Committee now ! sitting. The sum necessary to answer the purposes of tythes, he proposed, should be collected a general tax. The desired relief would thus be secured. He concluded by adverting to the evils which kid arisen from the oppression connected with the present sys tern of collecting tythes. It had been the parent of insurrection. The White Boys, the United Irishmen, and the Thrashers, had been raised or irritated by this system. An evil which had been a chief cause of insurrection for (it) years continuance, surely re quired a remedy. The people of Ireland had been taught from a speech of Mr. Pitt, circulated in li e land with great ardour, to believe, that a change iu the system of tythes would be one ofthe effects of tiro. Ueion. It would be politic in the House to shew that their expectations, in one respect, at least, were at last to be answered. He plaeed in a strong light the min. chievous consequences likely to result from irritating the pt pulation of Ireland, by refusing an incpery into one of their most serious grievances, at a time edienour enterprising enemy would have such vest means of taking advantage of our internal disunion, and of exe cuting his favourite pi-jeer of attacking the Empire through Ireland—its weak part. He then moved for a Committee for the purposes stated at the commence. ment of his speech. Mr. W. POLE said, no man was more desirous than he was that something truly efficient should be done in the case of the collection of tythes in Ireland. He differed however entirely with the Hon. Gentle man as to the appointment of a Committee being a measure calculated for that purpose. It would oniy be raising hopes in the people, which from the House not being able to see its way, would not be iii its power to realize. If the Hon. Gentleman had come forward with a specnic proposition, he would 11 -n'e directly met him c.n it ; but he conceived the state meats of the Hon. Gentleman were not correct. Ore . fact was, that the mischief lay with the lawil,rds of estates, farms, &c. who put them to cant, and dis posed of them for the most money that cooiLi be get ---a great deal more than they were worth, without any mention of their being liable to the pi.ynii , rit el tythes ; and when 0 tires came to be demanded, the le, nants grumbled, and landlords encouraged them to resist. This subject had been under the considera tion of Ministers for some time, and several bois had been framed for the purpose, but it had been found that none of them would answer the cud propose.!. — He was going over to Ireland, would inquire most 1 minutely into every thin; relating to the subject, .niti hoped he should be able next Ses,ion to bring 1,41 - ‘ ,- ;!:1 a specific proposition on the subject. At pre , en: cle first obstacle that struck him appeared to be insur mountable. The clergy n o w , Irian resistance and oilier causes, did not receive above 1 -2Oth—in limey instances not 1-30th ; how then was he to make ;la arrangement to benefit the people, by making th,ea pay I -I Oth ? G e ntleman . , . This the Hon. G :ay :bey should pay by a tax imposed for the purpthe ; but not one-tenth of the tythes, but of the net produc.: ,t . the benefice. This was an injustice he could nevelt consent to. If the Hon. Gentleman meant to abolish tythes, let him say so ; but the means he would ad -1 vise in the present instance were impracticable. He could not agree to go to a Committee without some specific proposition being laid before the House, on which it might form some judgment as to the n tone of the measure intended, and therefore he nurt vstst the motion. He concluded by saying, that the al: - pointment of a Committee would produce a mflame ilrer ii — 11 to eo eet al spirit of Inn to em. ipulous o n 1 iad not the 1 is coun t ry. i 1 harshness: