Star. — London, England, 1822-11-23 00:00:00

iIS 1 LAW INTELLIGENCE• ;VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, NOVEMBER' 2. lILANCIIARD V. THE EAST INDIA COMPANY. Some time hack a person of the name of Blanchard applied to the Court to giant an order directing that the East Luba Company should pay over to him the sum of i.:60(), to enable him to provide for the passage of sixty Lascars to India. The Counsel for Mr. Baxter upon that occasion stated, that the Las cars had been engaged to work a vess: , l from India to England, upon the understanding that they were to be shipped to return to their own country at the expense of the owners of the vessel, within three weeks after their arrival here. The vessel reached this coun try in safety, and the profits of her freightage were deposited in the hands of the East India Company: A dispute existed between Mr. Baxter and Mr. Blanchard respecting the tight of ownership to the vessel, and a cause was now. pending in the Admi ralty Court to decide this question. The East India CoMpany refused to pay any money out of the fon& in their possession, either to Mr. Baxter or to Mr. Blanchard, until the question respecting the title of ownership should have been determined ; in the meantime the Laiscars, for want of the money neces sal yto provide for their passage, were compelled, contrary to their inclination and the agreement under Which they had been engaged, to remain in this country. Under these circumstances, Mr. Baxter prayed that the Court would direct the East India Company to transfer out of the funds in their hands, the stun of £6OO, for the purpose abovementioned. The Court acceded to the motion. Mr. HORNE, this morning, informed the Court, that since Mr. Baxter had obtained the order for the tran,fer of the £:300, he had engaged with the Cap tain of the ship Melpomene for the passage of the Lascars to India, hut he now refused to draw the funds from the East India Company to pay the Cap tain. The Melpomene was expected to sail imme diately, and his client (Mr. Blanchard) was extremely 'anti-rigs that the Lascars should sail in it, as they were highly dissatisfied at being detained in this country, which they imputed to the instrumentality of Mr. BlanchatJ, and had actually beset his house in consequence. lie therefore moved that the Court would over-rule its former order, and direct that the sum of 1.:600 should be transferred by the East India Company to Mr. Blanchard, to be appropriated by him to the securing the, passage of the Lascars to their own country. Mr. BELL who appeared on the part of the East India Company, said that his clients considered them solves mete stake-holders, and they were willing to dispose of the fonds in their hands in any way which the Court might direct. Mr. RosE, Counsel for Mr. Baxter, admitted that that Gentleman did not intend to send the Lascars to India by the Melpomene, as he had at first pro posed, but it was his intention to send them home by a ship of his own, which would sail in about a month. In the meantime he would maintain them at his own expense. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said, it was evident that Mr. Baxter wished to avoid carrying into effect the order which the Court had made upon his applica tion. He would advise Mr. Horne's client not to press for an order upon the present occasion, but to pay for the passage of the Lascars by the Melpomene,. and then to apply to the Court for an order, which would enable him to rei tubut sehimself for the money which he had expended. Mr. HoaN s; said, he had no doubt his client would act upon the suggestion of his Honour. DAVIS V. TILE DUKE OF MARLBOROUGH. Mr. HART moved that the Court would direct the defendant to pay the plaintiff the sum of £172, being the amount of his taxed bill of costs. He would state the circumstances of the case. Some time since the Duke of Marlborough made an application to the Lord Chancellor for the discharge of the re ceiver of the rents arid profits of his estate, who had been appointed by the Court. Upon that occasion the Lord Chancellor declared that he would not per mit the receiver to be discharged until after a cen t tin sum of money had been paid into Court. The money was paid, and the receiver (the plaintiff) was discharged. The Lord Chancellor subsequently di. rected the defendant to pay the receiver his r osts, and referred it to the Master to ascertain their . amount. The Master allowed £l9B .as the amount of costs. This sum the defendant refused to pay, and a writ of sequestration was in consequence issued against him. The defendamt thereupon petitioned the Court that the Master might be directed to re view his taxation of costs. The Court granted the prayer of the Petition, and upon reviewing the costs, the Master struck out one item of £26, which re duced the amount to £172. To obtain from the Court an order directing the defendant to pay this sum, was the object of the present application. The process of sequestration had been suspended since the presentation of the defendant's Petition. He (Mr. Hart) apprehended that the plaintiff was entitled to the costs of the process of sequestration, and also of the present application. Mr. WRAY, for the defendant, contended that his client ought not to be made to pay the costs of the process of sequestration, because the plaintiff had not given him notice of his intention to take out the writ, but, on the contrary, had declared that he would not do so. Mr. HART observed, that his Learned Friend stated those facts from affidavits which had been filed upon some former occasion. He apprehended that it was irregular to refer to such affidavits without having given notice of the intention to do so. If, however, the Court thought the facts which he had mentioned material, he hoped the case might stand over until his client could prepare an answer to them. -The VICE-CHANCELLOR was of opinion that if the writ of sequestration had been taken out under the circumstances stated by Mr. Wray, the plaintiff had acted against good faith, and could not claim the costs of that process. It certainly was irregular to refer to affidavits which had been flied on a former occasion, without giving notice to the other side. lie would direct the case to stand over to the last day of Term, and in the meantime the defendant must in form the plaintiff whether he meant to refer to any, and what affidavits. CAMBRIDGE ELECTION. The VICE.CHANCELLOR, addressing Mr. Bell just beiore the rising of the Court, said, " You seem to think, Mr. Bell, that Counseltney l he absent two days next week, on account of ;voting at the Cambridge Election. I think it would be destrable that' ounsel should pair off. It certainly will be a greatincon. I venience if the whole business of the Com't should stand still for two days, because of the Elelfon . at Cambridge for a Member of Parliament." . Mr. shall be absent on the short cause day, and I will not take briefs for that day. - The Vice-CuaNcELLott.—l think the Candidates should give Counsel an opportunity of pairing off. Mr. HEALD (laughing).--I hope, Sir, we shall be all on one side. Mr. BELL.—I believe the Vice-Chancellor of the University has granted two days for the Election, one of which is the short cause day. I shall be absent then, as I am extremely anxious to vote on the occasion. The VICE•CII A aceLLoa.—But surely you may find some person who wiil pair off with you. I think your ti lend is bound to find you the means of doing so. Here the conversation terminated. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER 22. BREACH OF PROMISE OF MARRIAGE. ABBOTT V. YOUNG. • This was an action to recover damages for breach of promise of martiage. The cause was tried at the York Assizes, and a verdict found for the plaintiff, with i.:150 damages. The plaintiff was a young woman who had lived servant with the defendant, a corn-factor, at Bram well, near Leeds. Under a promise of marriage he seduced her, and she was delivered of a child. The defendant finally married a Misi Goselin, and aban doned the plaintiff. At the trial the promise of the defendant to marry the plaintiff was proved by Emma Abbott, the plaintiff's sister. The defendant's letters also were read, on which the Jury were in• duced to find their verdict. &Ikea HULLOCK, on a former day, moved for a new trial, on the ground that they had not been able at the trial to read two letters from the plaintiff to the defendant, which would have led the Jury to con clude no promise of marriage had been made by the defendant. At the trial it was stated in evidence that the plaintiff could not read, and consequently the Counsel for the defendant was not in a condition to prove the letters. Since the trial affidavits had been procured, stating' that the letters had been written by the plaintiff's sister, under the dictation of the plain tiff. Upon these affidavits the Court were induced to grant a Rule to shew cause. Mr. Itatmt this day sheaved cause against the Rule. In this case, he said, promise upon promise had been made to the poor girl, and wedding clothes bought. There was, in short ; no ground to disturb the verdict. The COURT wished the letters to be read, for the purpose of seeing whether they interfered with the due course of justice. Mr. RAINE read them. The following are passages: " Sia—This comes with kind love, hoping you are well. I cannot say lam very-welt at present. Little Eliza is a very line girl—you would hardly knw her if you saw her. If you have forgotten me, you might recollect little Eliza. I shall be much obliged to you if you will get me a situation. I think if it had been Miss G-- or Miss A-- you would have written to them. I hope you wilt write to me, if convenient ;if not, you may do as you please." The other letter contained this passage : " Sia—Mr. Crowther and Thomas insist on my coming to Wakefield to father my child. I should like you to send word what you will allot for the keep of your child." • Mr. Serjeant HULLOCK, Mr. WILLIAMS, and Mr. BROUGHAM, were beard in support of the application for a new trial ; but the Court held that it would be injustice to disturb the verdict.—New trial refused. THE KING V. MESSITER. In this prosecution against the defendant, for su bornation of perjury at the trial of an action brought by Sir T. Champneys, Bart. a motion was made for arrest of judgment. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE stated this day, that the Court could not hear the arguments on the question during the present Term.—The decision con-,equently stands over to next Term. CRIMINAL INFORMATION. Mr. CAturnEt.t. moved for a ltule to shew cause why a criminal information should not be tiled against a Magistrate of die county of Hereford, for a corrupt abuse of his office, in committing the ser vant of a Gentleman, named Austin, for a mere act of trespass, in clearing the water-course of a mill, the property of Mr. Austin, adjacent to the Magistrate's premises. In this stage of the proceedings welor bear entering into a detail of the particulars con tained in the ar i parte affidivits.—The COURT, under the circumstances stated, granted a Rule Nisi. • CONSISTORY COURT, NOVEMBER 22. TIIURLOW V. THURLOW. This was a suit of divorce, a lama et thoro, pro. 1 moted by Mr. Thurlow, the husband, against his wife, Maria Thurlow, by reason of adultery. The 1 pleadings were read at great length by Dr. JENNER and Dr. LusiuNGroN, immediately after which tke Court proceeded to judgment. The Learned Judge (Sir CIIRISTOPUER ROBINSON) observed, that the present cause originated in a suit, brought by the defendant, for a restitution of con jugal rights. She had not succeeded in establishing a claim to the interference of the Court on her behalf; and it would appear by the evidence which had been that day produced, that at the time when she insti tuted the proceeding just mentioned she was living in adultery, and passing as the wife of a person ss ith whom she carried on the criminal intercourse. In what spirit, or for what purpose the suit was com menced under such circumstances, it was difficult to imagine, though the Court was willing to admit the most favourable interpretation it would bear.. The parties to the suit then pending were, it seemed, mar ried about thirteen years before, and the answer of the husband went back to the year 1809. For a considerable period they lived tranquilly together, and had five children before their separation.— It not until 1821 that Mr. Thuvlow became fully 1 apprised of his wife's infidelity, or discovered the adulterous connection which had subsisted between her and several individuals. In answer to' these charges, Mrs.Thurlow had resorted to recrimination, and it was somewhat extraordinary that the two pe riods on which she fixed were the years 1809 and 1814, towards their latter end. Nu specifiCation was made of place or circumstance, and the whole was made to rest upon the inferences to be drawn from the testimony of a medical gentleman who attended 11 the husband at those periods. Had this 'ecru:tuna- ner, its effect case like this. and in looking a. White was so distinct and conclusive, as to leave veil little doubt upon his - mind with reFard to the prin cipal point—that of Mrs. Thurlow s misconduct. — The deponent swore to the latter having passed an entire day and night with a gentleman who then lodged in the home, and that she, the aforesaid wit ness)/saw her go away privately in the morning. This was corroborated by the landlady; 'and 'passing .over her cohabitation with Mr. Ferguson in the King s Bench, a place where testimony was not perhaps of the best description, the evidence of. Charlotte Carr was next in importance, as repelling the alibi which it had been attempted to. set up, and which was in consistent with every other statement in the case. No counterplea had been put in, but the Lady's de fence consisted of another allegation, which, on the opposite side, it had hardly been thought neces s ary to dispute. The recrimination too was of a particu lar nature, quite general in the first instance, and then confined to a period of three months after'the mar riage, the only further time specified. being the latter part of the year 1814. Now the surgecn who was esamined, could recollect nothing of the first-men tioned period, and gave a direct negative to the sus picion as respected the year 1814. There was not.' therefore the least substance or colour of a defence which the Court could recognise in any stage of the proceedings. The charge against the husband was con fined to two periods, of which the latest was 1814, and yet these parties had lived together till the year 1810. Mrs. Thurlow then thought proper to leave her hus band without any apparent provocation.; she was the daughter of an opulent person in extensive business, and every effort had been made to reconcile her to Mr. Thurlow. To all these proposals she had refused to listen. Subsequent to this disunion, no complaint had been urged against the husband, and he, as had been already observed, continued in ignorance of her misconduct, till the year 1821. He (the Judge) had paid the deepest attention to Avery part of this inquiry, nor had anything presented itself favourable to the defendant's case of which she had not been allowed the utmost benefit. He was of opinion, notwithstand ing, that the plaintiff's allegation had been substan tially proved, that nothing was advanced on the other tide capable of repelling the legal consequence, and that the separation prayed for must he decreed. The de • fondant, if she should be so advised, might appeal to a higher Court against this judgment. been substantiated in the clt.arest twairl wo uld have been. very questionable in sb r e, Such was the result of the pleadings i w, T , ng at the evidence, that of Eilxubetir Burke _ -- POLICE INTELLIGENCE. Manstoe-llotole.—Yesterday, llutchinsor, Conner of the ce lebrated Topaze frigate, which fired upon the Chinese some months ago, applied to the LORD MAYO% for his Lordship's in terposition in favour of a little boy, named Shea, whose merits and misfortunes entitle bins to particular notice. The Gunner said, that the Topaze touched at Ceylon, where the poor boy was hard at work amongst the natives in the town of Trincomalee, and greatly discontented at his situation. The Gunner compassionated the child, and finding that he spoke English, proposed to him to leave his slavery, and take his chance in another country. The offer was embraced; and the boy was taken on board, with the consent of Captain Richard son, the Commander of the frigate. It was impossible to do jus tice to the youth during the period of his service; although not twelve years of age, his activity, c-orage, and grateful recollec tion of benefits could not be surpassed. The Gunner having failed in repeated attempts to procure him employment at Portsmouth, brought him up to London, in the hope that cha racter would compensate for the defect of a diminutive stature. The Loan Mavoa highly commended the humanity of the gunner, and at the same time felt some surprise at the diffi culty encountered in the efforts to obtain a situation for so va luable a boy. The gunner declared, that he should select the boy from a multitude of all ages and abilities, to accompany him upon any dangerous enterprite. The journey from Portsmouth to Lon don had been undertaken in the confident hope that a master could be found through the interference of the Magistrates, or the well known liberality of the public press. If, however, the attempt should not be successful, he (the gunner) would still continue his contributions for the support of the boy. The Loan Mason said he should certainly endeavour to serve the boy, and directed that the Governor of the Giltspur-street Compter should, in the meantime, take all possible care of him. At parting Irons the boy the gunner shed tears, and gave him much more than half the contents of his pocket. It was, in the course cif the recital, mentioned by the gunner, that he was one of the two whom the Chinese demanded for execution, in consequence of the fire which the Topaze had di rected against them. Captain Saumarez, who has undertaken to see justice done to the soldier's wife whose case we mentioned in the STAR of Friday se'imight as one of great hardship, sustained by her !chance upon two persons who acted as ship-brokers, without being sworn, appeared at the Justice-room, and had souse conversation with the LORD MAYOR. , The Captain said he had frequently applied at the house of the unsworn brokers, but did not suppose they had any intention of paying back to the poor woman her 401. or procuring her a pas sage to the Cape. The consequence was ' be had set on foot a subscription, and hoped fur the sanction of his Lordship. The Loan MAYOR much approved of the alternative adopted In favour of the poor woman and her five children. l pis Lordship then put down his name for 5/.35. and directed the chief clerk to prepare the necessary papers preparatory to a law process against Capp and King, for acting as brokers without being sworn. TOWN-HALL, SOUTHWARIC.—/kury Ifensky, 17, ancis Burgess, and John Elliot Fox, were charged with makiug a " Tons,Jerry, and Logic" row, after midnight, near St. Thomas's Hospital, in the Borough. The prisoners were dressed in a fashionable man ner : two of them are pupils at the Hospital—the other a lawyer. A watchman stated, that at three o'clock in the morning, the prisoners were making a noise in Maze Pond, knocking at the different doors, crying, " Ge it, Tom—go it, Jerry—go it, Logic!" One of them said, " Now we'll floor the d—d old Charley !" They then ran with great force against a watch-box, 'and endeavoured to upset it. They were not, however, able to effect their object of boxing a Charley, though they broke the box. William Rich, a watchman, stated, that he saw the prisoners come out of I house in Weston-street, Southwark, about three ' o'clock in the morning, in which there had been a good deal of 1 singles through the night. The prisoners immediately add " There's a Charley !—let's have a lark with the old buffer !" They then came up to his watc h-box, and " blow'd him u p !'' The night constable of St. Olave's watch-house, stated, that the prisoners conducted themselves in the watch-house with ex treme violence, and Fox said, " I have a pistol and ball, and will do for you, master constable!" • Edward Palmer stated, that the prisoner Fox dared Kelly to keep him a moment in the watch-house ; he said he was an At. torney, and he had, powder and shot for him ; he then turned to ' one of his companions and said, " Do you think the fellow is worth powder and shot ?" Mr. Alderman SUITU said, this was another proof of the ill effects produced by a nondescript theatrical representation, of - most immoral tendency, called " Life in London," which had ' not only corrupted the minds and lodgment of the lower class of society, but he was sorry to say, of persons moving in respect able stations.' Not a single night elapsed but young fellows were aping Tom tied Jerry in the streets, thinking it was as easy to beat watchmen In reel life, 'as in the scenes they had witnessed upon the Stage. Uuless they paid a sum of money to some Ch.:- Thy, be should feel it his duty to order them to find ball for assaulting the watchmen: The trio then agreed td give three guineas to' the St. Olave's Female Charity School, and to pay the watchmen and constables, which being done, they were repritnauesl'and diselwrged. • • IIIItTFIS. . • • Monday last, the 18th instant, at Belton novae, Lincoln. thv Countess Brown's:me, of a daughter. fimday, ►t Ballybricken, near Curk, the Lady of 111.1j1r r, of a .daughter.. MARRIED. On Thursday last, at All Saints, Lewes, -by the Rev. John Scobell, Julian Slight, _Esq. of Portsmouth, Hants, to Elia 4 Alma, only daughter of the late Thomu Wool'gar, Esq. of the former plack. March 13, at Penang, Lieutenant Stuart Corbett, of the :r. gal .rtny, tee Charlotte, daughter of the but Thomas Briett4:, I Esq. of Suffolk-lane. Monday, at Madron Church,Cornerall,GeorgeGilbertCme , 4 M.D. and F.R.S. to Mary, only child of the late John Denci Esq. of Alverton, Penzance. At Achindartorb, in Argyleshire, Major George Germaine '"Cochrane, half-pay 57th Regiment, to Susan, elde*t daughter of the Rev. Donald M'Coll. Monday, at Conlnpby, 747 r. John Callmaek,widower,aged of Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, to Miss Day s • blw.hirg virgin, aged 63, of the former place. On the day of their twiet-' just at the time night was about to draw its curtain, in steppe,l to the marriage feast a Mister Constable, from a neighliourin , rih lage,who, by virtue of a Magistrate's warrant, took the groom into custody for. the maintenance of a choppirg boy, 4 whom he was the reputed father, by a frail fair one, and f•;q' which he absconded about 23 yens ago. NutwithAandiug th? , tears and entreaties of the affectionate bride and her attendant,' Mister Constable, like the rest of the knig,lits of the staff. deaf complaint, captured his victim, took him to his own parish, and I kept him several days i 4 tow, till ample satisfaction was given. • WED. • • Nov. 6, at Clifton, aged 68, Captain Andrew Sproule, R.N, formerly of the William - and Mary, Dublin yacht. June 11, at Ashmedabad, Lieutenant Charles Terrington, the 2d Bombay Light Cavalry. Sunday, at Chelsea College, Captain Roycroft, Adjutant of that Institution, and late Captain in the 17th Dragoons. Nov. 12, at Marsh-green, Osbyshire, aged 75, af , :er a short illness, Bright Nedder, Esq. Captain in the 84th Foot. Nov. 14, at Drinkld, Derbyshire, of infl immation,which con- , tinned a fortnight, Randal 11:.miiston i Nov. 14, in Margaret-street, Cavendish-square, J. Minthin, Esq. late Captain in the 9th Lancers. Lately, at Bath, Sir IL•nry White, K.C.B. Major-General of the Bengal Army, to which be b.:longed for upwards of 31 year , . At Whitehaven, in his 64th year, Robert Blakeney, Esq. an acting Magistrate, and Deputy-Litutenant of Cumberland. Nov. 19, in Not folk-street, Mr. 6. 'Francs, Professor of As tronomy in the Royal Academy, Berlin. On the evening of the 11th instant, in Portland -street, rear Port-Eglinton, the Rev. John Leech, formerly of Largs, teach:r of Hebrew, and Lecturer on Sacred Criticism, in Glasgow, in the 59th year of his age. Ilis death was most unexpected. The evening before, and indeed for a considerable time past, he had been uncommonly cheerful and se-rene. About nine o'clock he had occasion to go out to make two or clime short calls, at tht.- last of which he was earnestly pressed to take a great coat, (.(s the night had become uncommonly stormy,. which he refused, as he was going straight home and to bed, and had nothing on bins that could be spoiled by the wet. Ile took a short cut by a made footpath, in which were several anpleasant steps, all (.1 which he got over, and was •s :thin 100 yards of his own hotoe, on a good hard road, when he was struck with apoplexy, M which, it would appear, he had instantly died, for lie was found lying straight forward upon his face in the very middle of it, none of his clothes, and only his shoes and stockings,' being the least soiled or discompose d ; nor was there the snial:e: injury on his person, saving only on his face, where he had str:::k on the ground, which was a little bruised, but which neverth:le.:.; indicated the same uncommon composure and mildness that had done for some time pa nor had the least article been ab stracted fram him. Perhaps there are few scholars of the a'e who excelled Mr. 1.. in cruslitian in the sacred languages, aid in critical biblical knowledge. N EWGATIRaito LEA DI ALL MARK ETS, (By the Carcase.) Reef ..... ...Is 8d -.to 2s 81 I Veal to 4s 41 Mutton.. ...... 2.3 Od to Sts 4tl Pork .........2s Od to Z•s 81 PR IC&S or HA 'V AND STRAW YESTERDAY. ST. J A MIES ' S. W MT= HArgt. 1-Tay .51 cc; od to 41 Os Ad Hay... 51 6s to 41 os OA Straw 11 7; od to 11 16s 6d I Straw 11 Bs to 11 16. 04 Clover 31 7; Od to bl 4s 01 Clover 7:1 Ui to 41 10: od 1-10Ps. NEW rocu-r:N. Kent, Suksex _2l Os t') 21 His Elsex • ' .121 5s to 51 His F4rithans ,61 Os v.) 71 is PRICE 0 1 , 4/.W MACS. Kent 2l fts to 41 10s Sussex 2l Os to 21 10., Kssex Foreign l' RICE .OF LEATHER. Butts,' 50 to 561hs each 224 to 234 per lb Ditto, 56 to G6lbs each ..... ; . ..,. .... —24 d 251 Dressing hides 1841 to 194 Fine Coach Hides , 10d to 20} Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for hitting 19} to 204 Ditto 45 to 50Ibs 20} to 224 Calf Skins, 30 to 401b5........... 2IJ to 263 Ditto 50 to 70Ibs 06t1 to 32d Ditto 70 to 80Ilis 25c1 to 274 Small Seals (Greenland) lBd to sod Large ditto 18d to 20d Tanned Horse Hides 77d to 181 RAW WOES. 1 Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary... es Si to es laa stone) ls 4d to 5s 6d Market Calf lOs od to Os od Aliddlings 3s Od tc 3s ed Eng. Horse Os Od to Os oi ot TALLOW, Town Tallow 46s od Yellow Russia Whitt ditto Soap ditto Melting Stuff 3ss Od SOAP, &c. per 112/b. Ditto rough ........ ..... Yellow Soap Mottled ... Curd ...... Pidon ;Ss tois PRICE OF CANDLES—From 'fellow Chandlers' Dad., Candles, per doz. 95 Od—Moulds, Ma 6d; 6d. pet dozen allowed for ready money. COAL MARKET, NOV. 22. Collin•rwood 7,Bs—Killingworth 451 Sti—Wasend Drown': 45s— W:lisend Newnsarch 44s %Valenti NorthumberLL l 459, 3d—Wasend 448—Wallsend Russell 4319++ — Hartley 39s—Eden Nlain 4us 6d—Nesharss 42. 9d. 101 Ships at Market-9 Ships sold-1i unsold. COUNTRY MARKETS. • OXFORD, Nov. 16.—Wheat 4s. Bd. a bushel. The price of a half-peck loaf (household) ls. id. ll.tnsusv, Nov. tn.—Wheat, 2s. 61 to ss. bd.—Beans es. 4d. to :,s Hd.—Vetches, Os Od per bushel.—Barley, ISt to 30:-- Oats, 16s oil to 213 s Od per quarter—Brcad, Is Od halt perk ; and smaller in proportion. Flour ess. to 4os. per scck. UXBRIDGE, Nov. 21.—New Wheat per load £ 0 Os to E 1.7 Os. Wheat, £7 10i to XI I—Barley, per guar:Jr, 23s to .74k —0;t:, Itis to :,Os—Beans, 27s to 7.2l.—Peas, ::8s to SU. Nv.w snav, Nov. 21.—Wheat, 21s to 455. !Wier, 21s to .10s—Oats. I4s to 2isr—lkatts, 9 to 3.7):4—rras, to 30.;.—Ityr, Os to es.—Breatt, 100 to is Oid per COURSE OF Amsterdam l2 2 C.F. Ditto at sight 12 19 Rotterdam— l2 2 2U. Antworicer4no 12 4 1•1amburgh....... u 37 7 2U. Altuna 37 0 11.1. - i':,X CH .1 N C; E. Seville ...... .... Gibrahar .74 Patio, sday's'sight 4.5 50 U. Ditto 43 410 Madrid, effective 37i Cadiz cffect ..... 36 I.eghorn Genoa 474 Venice Ital. lAv fog Barcelona ........S4 Bilboa, riftctive 57 Matta Naples ... ... 39 Adana° S pat or. Lisbon Rio Jasselro.:. 46 Dublin .. 9 Cork ..... 93 - - -.: --- . MA I LS. •sa. nu a. ' •Itlt. rtit 6tiblin 1 0 Trance I 0 , Wateriord " 3 0 MAW:task 0 ;• 1 Gt,er .I:ey and Jersey 0 0 Flanders 0 to I .i,t+fin 0 0 Malta 0 0 Flolland 0 0 Gottenburgh 1 1 'ard lilandt 0 0 Brazil 0 ' ----. :4IGH•WA l'Slt at LONDOS hitt! GE TO-h1011“ •• MLottync - - • 31 Iltikute 4 after 9 varroun 3 minutes after 10 LONDON; fruited and published by beim Ks" rich.ti ' plate, Temp -LeeW; i, 11 i~ r 11 a ~ ~. , E 1 . 1 '