Star. — London, England, 1821-03-29 00:00:00

, •,... ' ~; ..~L TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST-INDIA STOCK. 1 LADINS An s GENTLANN, I /SHE ELECTION OrliSIX DIRECTORS of the 1 EAST-INDIA COMPANY being appointed for WED NESDAY, the 11th April - next, the favour of your Vote and Interest is requested for the following Gentlemen, viz. JOHN Bens, Esq. Hon. WILLIAM FULLARTON lawn Dooms. i Esq. Etrimsroor.. UN JO Ixclas, Esq. JAMES PATTISON, Esq. Which will much oblige, Ladievand Gentlemen, Your most humble Servants; Campbell Marjoribanks Geo. Abercrombie Robinson William Taylor Money Thomas Reid John Morris Josias Du Pre Alexander Edward Parry William Astell Rich. Chicheley Plowden Jacob Bosanquet Charles Elton Prescott Robert Campbell George Raikes William Stanley Clarke John G. Ravenshaw Joseph Cotton George Smith Neil Benjamin Edmonstone John Thornhill Charles Grant Sweeny Toone John Huddleston • William Wigrasn Hugh Unsay. JOSEPH DART, Secretary. East-India House, the 28th March, 1821. , - "TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST-INDIA STOCK. LAMS AND GENTLEMEN, ITAVING the honour of being recommended to you by the Directors of the East-India Company, as CANDIDATES for the DIRECTION to be chosen this year, we take the liberty of requesting the favour of your Vote on the day of Election, WEDNESDAY, the 11th April next. We are, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your meat humble Servants, JOHN BEBB. JAMES DANIELL. WILLIAM FULLARTON ELPHINSTONE. JOHN INGLIS. JAMES PATTISON, East-India House, the 28th March, 1821. .TO THE PROPRIETORS OF FAST INDIA STOCK. LAMS AND GENTL/EMEN, IBEG leave to annex a Copy of the Resolutions which have this day been unanimously passed by a very numerous and respectable assemblage of your Body, and earnestly to solicit the favour of your Votes and Interest at the approaching ELECTION, which will take place at the East- India House on the 11th of April next. Should I, through your suffrages, be elevated to the distill.. stashed situation of a Director of your Affairs, I beg to assure you, that the whole of My time and attention shall be devoted to the promotion of your interests. 1 have the honour to be, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your obedient humble servant, 70IIN LOCH. City of London Tavern, 20th March, 1821. AT a numerous and highly-respectable MEET ING of PROPRIETORS of EAST-INDIA STOCK, held at the CITY or LONDON Taszax, on Tuzansr, the 20th March, 1821, ROBERT WILLIAMS, Esq. M.P. in the Chair, The following Resolutions were passed unanimously : Proposed by JONN Foasas, Esq. and Seconded by Faux Ittessoaa, Esq. I. That the experience acquired by Captain Jaws Loci, during a long period of service in the Naval Establishment of the Honourable East-India Company, constitutes, in our opinion, a substantial qualification fur the beneficial discharge of the du ties of a Director. Proposed by Sir Tuzonntos Mrecatrz, Bart. and • Seconded by 11/CII4IID CAINCYDELL BAZZTT, Esq. 2. That independently of the recommendation to the support of this Meeting, and the suffrages of the Proprietary. which Captain . Loch possesses, from his intimate knowledge of that branch of the Honourable Company's Affairs, in which he has been professionally engaged, we are convinced, that his general attainments, his independent and honourable character, and entire freedom from other pursuits, are essential pledges or his able and zealous promotion of the Hon. Company's interests. Proposed by Jamas Axxx.sxuas, Esq. M.P. and Seconded by Geoacut SIIKODEN, Faq. 3. That, influenced by the above considerations, this Meeting will, both collectively and individually, strenuously exert them selvA to ensure the election of Captain Loch to fill the vacancy occasioned by the death of Colonel John Bladen Taylor. ROBERT WILLIAMS, Chairman. Proposed by Witztax Rrantosoo, Esq. and Seconded by THOMSON HANIEgT, D+ That the cordial Thanks of this Meeting be given to Rosati. Wattairs, Esq. ALP. for his able conduct in the Chair. Capt. Loch's Commiuee will meet daily at the City of London Tavern, Bishopsgate-street, where every communication will be thankfully received. TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST INDIA STOCK. LADILS sun Goma:arm, IBEG leave to submit to your consideration the very flatering Resolutions which have this day been unanimously passed at a Meeting of my Friends, and, at the same time, to express my earnest hope that I shall be honoured with your Support at the approaching Election on the 11th of April. During the progress of a very active Canvass, and in the va rious Statements I have addressed to you, I trust I have been able to convince you, that in soliciting the honour of your Suffrages to place me in the high situation to which my ambition aspires, I do so upon claims to your attention of the strongest nature. If success should crown my efforts, I can safely promise the undivided dedication of my time and talents to the promotion of your Interests. I have the honour to be, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your most obedient and very humble Servant, ABRAHAM WELLAND. London Tavern, March 27, 1121. Mr. WZLIAND'S Committee will meet daily at the London Tavern, Bishopsgate-street, where every Communication win be thankfully acknowledged. AT a numerous and highly-respectable MEETING of PROP RI ETORS of EA ST INDIA STOCK (Friends of Mr. Welland), held at the Old London Tavern, Biabopsgale street, on TUZSDAY, the 27th of March, 1821, GEORGE PALMER, Esq. in the Chair; The following Resolution, passed at a Meeting of Mr. Welland's Friends, on the 30th of May, 1820, was read, viz. That Mr. Welland's long residence in India, and the high situations which he has filled, chiefly in the departments of Re venue and Jurisprudence, having enabled him to acquire an in timate and comprehensive knowledge of the local interests and concerns of that important branch of the British Empire, as well as the dispositions of the Inhabitants, their morals and habits, that Gentleman is eminently qualified for the Office of a Direc tor of the East India Company." It was then moved by John Pepys, Esq. seconded by George Grote, Esq. and Resolved unanimously, That this Meeting fully concurs in all the sentiments therein expressed of the pretensions of Mr. Welland to a Seat in the Court of Directors ; and will cordially unite in the most strenu ous exertions to secure his Election, at thr Ballot to be held on riu.• 11th April, fur a Successor to the deceased Colonel Taylor; and does anxiously and respectfully recommend Mr. Welland to the Suffrages of the Proprietors at large. GEORGE PALMER. u se Clia;rman having quitted the Chair, it was moved by Sir - Nial..sels Massed Lopes, Bart. seconded by Lieutenant-Colonel _Lumsden, and Resolved unanimously, - That the Thanks of the Meeting be given to George Palmer, _,Esq. for his able conduct in th e Chair. MANASEII M. LOPEZ. STABLISIIED upwards of TWENTY YEARS, for the S ALI; of IRISH LINEN by the PIECE, at the Factor's price, No. 4, on the South Side of Bloomsbury-square, four doors from the top of Southampton-street, Holborn.—The I ItISI - 1 LINEN CObIPANY beg leave to announce to the • Public, that the above House is their only Establishment in this Country, where they continue to supply the Nobility, Gentry, - am] the Public, with Warranted. Grass-Bleached Linen, for •Srtirts and Sheets, - of the best fabric and colour, at a price con siderably lower than they can be procured through any other medium. They also engage to return the purchase-money, should any fault appear. Good Irish Bills and Bank of Ireland Notes taken as usual. Country and Town Orders punctually attended to by JOHN DONOVAN, 4, Bloomsbury-sq. London, JOHN DOYLE, 31, St. Mary's Abbey, Dublin, S Agents. YETZEIZIAEY cottgo. THE : !ANNIVERSARY MEETING of the VE TERINARY SURGEONS and P vrius, - Educated at this ESTABLISHMENT, will be held at the Vass.-31ssoss' `Tiiiati; On Touasner, the sth of Aran. Professor COLEIII AN, in the Chair. STEWARDS. Mr. NEWPORT. Mr. C. MARSHALL. Mr. SCHISOISHER. Mr. PERMVAL. Mr. Moat.cr. Mr. A. Hasocasots. Mr. H. GRAY. Mr. E. Tussle's. Mr. J. CHILD. M;. R. V. Dewsow. Mr. J. MARRLSON. Mr. Smut.. Dinner on Table at Half-past Six precisely. Tscrivi, Osot GUINRA each, may be had (before the sth of April) of the Stewards,_. at the Bar of the Tavern ; and at the Veterinary College.—March 27, 1321. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDING& HOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH 2111. in the Appeal from Scotland " Boise v. Bailey," Mr. Gann. and Mr. Frrammt4 were heard for the appellant. Further hearing postponed. Evidence was heard in the Divorce cue of " Miller v. Miller," after which, the LOND Cnancettou expressed his intention of moving, that the evidence be printed, in order that their Lord ships •might form an opinion on the subject, before t►e Bill should pass through any other stage. Mr. Baonnint, from the Commons, brought up the Irish Witchcraft Repeal Bill, and the Irish Bankrupt Laws' Amend ment Bill ; which were read a first time. Some Private Bills were brought up by Admiral Sornsson and others. The Irish Attorneys' Fees Regulation Bill, and the Commer cial Intercourse Bill, were read a second time. The Grampound Witnesses Indemnity Bill went through a Committee. The Earl of CARNARVON presented a Petition from cer tain landholders in the County of Leicester, praying for a re peal of the Duty on Husbandry Horses. The Earl of CARNARVON then gave notice, that on Monday, the 9th of April, he would move that the witnesses on the Grampound case do attend at the Bar of the House ; and that on the same day he should move the second reading of the Grampound Disfranchisement BM—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. Sir J. COTTEREL presented a Petition against the Catholic Bill, from the Dean and Chapter of Hereford. Laid on the table. Mr. L. LECK brought in a Bill to render valid Indentures of Parish Apprentices signed by Churchwardens.—Read a first time, ordered to be read a second time on Monday next, and to be printed. Mr. FOSTER moved for an Account of the number of l Country Bank-notes issued from 1779 to the latest period at which the same could be made out.—Ordered. Mr. S. WORTLEY moved for a Select Committee to exa mine into the state of the laws for regulating the Stamping of Woollen Cloths, and to report their opinion thereon to the liouse.—Agreed to. GOLD AND SILVER BULLION. Mr. GRENFELL reminded the House, that on a former night he had given notice of a motion for certain Accounts of the Prices at which Silver had been purchased by the Mint since May, 1816. When he mentioned this subject before, he stated, that it appeared that last year a quantity of silver had been purchased by the Mint from the Bank at ss. 2d.--.3 price which was four per cent. above the market price ; and the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite ob served, that that purchase was connected with other transactions which required a fuller explanation than he was then prepared to give. It was in order to give the Right Hon. Gentleman an opportunity of making that explanation that he now called the at tention of the House to the subject. At the same time, if it were true, as rumour asserted, that the Right Hon. Gentleman, being, in 1819, in possession of a large amount (he believed a million and a half) of silver in bars, wished the Bank to take it at 55.2 d. in part payment of the debt of ten millions then due to the Bank, and that the Bank agreed . to take it, upon the condition that if the Government should afterwards want silver for the Mint they should take an equal quantity of silver from the Bank at the same price, there was nothing whatever in the transaction which could affect the character of the Bank in the slightest degree—(Hear, hear).—He was happy also to state, that, so far as he could judge, the business at the Mint had been generally conducted on fair and advantageous principles. He then moved for Ac counts of all Silver which had been purchased by the Government since May, 1816, the names of the per sons from whom the purchases had been made, and the conditions of the purchase; also for an Account of the Contracts which had been made since that pe riod, and which were now subsisting between the . Government and the Bank, relative to the Supply of Gold or Silver Bullion to the Mint. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he would not oppose the motion for these Returns. Mr. PEARSE expressed his confidence, that every transaction between the Bank and the Government, would bear the most rigid examination. The Accounts were then ordered. CASH PAYMENTS BILL. The CHANCELLOR of the Excazqunrt moved the Order of the Day for the House resolving itself into a Committee on the Cash Payments Bill. Mr. GRENFELL rose, and adverting to a state ment made some time back in that House, of the Bank of Ireland refusing to take sovereigns as a de posit, said, that he was authorized to contradict that statement in the most positive manner; as also the assertion that they had refused to discount the bills of those merchants who had been forward in import ing gold coin into Ireland. The Hon. Member corn mended the general conduct of the Governors of the Bank of Ireland; and stated, as an act that deserved general approbation, that when the circulation of Country Bank notes was stopped so suddenly and fatally in the South of Ireland, the National Bank raised their issues by nearly fitly per cent. Mr. ELLICE (of Coventry) said, that be had heard from undoubted authority, that the Bank of Ireland had refused to receive sovereigns tendered to them to complete certain sales made under a decree of the Court of Chancery, and it was not until after some time that they consented to do that which, by the law, they were bound to do. In truth, it was natu ral enough that the Bank of Ireland should refuse to accept gold at that moment, and give out their paper in return, for he had predicted that it would be a consequence of the Bill of 1819, that there would be a fall in the price of gold. Mr. PEEL said, that if the Honourable Gentle man extended his inquiries sufficiently, he would find that the Bank of Ireland only did that which they believed, and which he also believed, was for the public good. It should be recollected, that at the time when the Bank were stated to have refused a tender of sovereigns, there was difference of ex change between 'the two countries in favour of Ire land, by which means the importers of gold into Ire land were enabled, by getting Irish notes in exchange for it, to make on those sovereign About two or three per cent. The Right Hon. Gentleman bore personal testimony to the disposition of the Corpora- I tion of the Bank of Ireland to forget their own luta rests. in those of the Country, and stated, that they had for a considerable period managed the public debt, not only without remuneration, but at a very great expense. Mr. ELLICE disavowed any intention of throwing injurious imputations on the Bank of Ireland ; he only complained of the law. Mr. M.FITZGER ALD highly eulogized the Bank Directors, who, he said, had in the case of the recent failures in the commercial world in Ireland, con ducted themselves most wisely and liberally towards the Public, regardless of their own profits. With respect to their refusal of sovereigns, they might have done it in some instances, where parties had drawn paper by design for gold, and made a profit of 3V 2 per cent. on the transaction. Sir H. PARNELL complained that the Bank had not regulated their issues of notes prudently ; and, as regarded the statement of the liberality of the Bank in managing the National Debt for nothing, it should be recollected that they, at the time they un dertook to do so, had some greit advantages be stowed on them : for they were permitted to create a considerable quantity of new Stock, in considera don of their so doing, on terms highly advantageous to themselves. He complained that the Bank of Ire land, whilst it enjoyed all the advantages of mono poly as a National Bank, wished to conduct them selves as a private body, and to oppose any sacrifice for the public advantage. Mr. IRVING thought the Bank should have re ceived gold as deposits, and issued notes. He con sidered the monopoly of the Bank as prejudicial to the great interest* of the People. The Honourable Gentleman wished that there should be Branch Banks established in Ireland, as there were in Scotland.— He thought the same argument would apply to the Bank of England also. Mr. ELLIS (of Dublin) defended the conduct of the Bank : at the time they refused to take gold, there was an extensive speculation going on in Dub lin, the object of which was a profit of at least three per cent. If they had refused to issue notes for the discount of bills, he would have joined in censuring them ; but he defied any one to produce a single instance in which they had refused to discount a bill .fairly offered to them. At the time of the failures in Ireland, when property to the amount of a million of money was in an instant annihilated, and distress was excessive, Parliament placed £500,000 in the hands of Commissioners, to be applied to the relief 'of the sufferers : only £lOO,OOO of this sum was ap plied for, the liberality of the Bank having rendered other aid unnecessary. Mr. RICARDO considered that the Bank of Ire land had been placed in very difficult circumstances, and had acted with an energy which, perhaps, would not have been displayed in this country. The exten sive failures in Ireland amongst private Banks called for an increased circulation on the part of the Bank, and they did, in fact, increase their circulation nearly .50 per cent. a very great exertion on their part, and one very difficult to carry into effect. But they would have enlarged them still more, could they have found securities on which to do it. The Hon. Member eulogized the Bank of Ireland for their liberality in managing the National Debt, and ob served, they acted in this respect very differently from the Bank of England. Sir J. NEWPORT reminded the House that there was a subject before the House which had a claim upon its immediate attention, and suggested the postponement of the measure now under considera tion until to-morrow. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, af ter observing that it had not been kis intention to take up the time of the House with any observations, but that a conversation having arisen upon the sub ject which was likely to continue, he would move that the further debate upon this motion he postponed till to-morrow, which was agreed to. CATHOLIC CLAIM& The Order of the Day having been read for the House toresolve itself into a Committee on the Roman Catholic Relit! Bill; Sir J. NEWPORT moved that the Speaker do leave the Chair. Mr. HUTCHINSON rose and said that, before the Speaker left the Chair, he would, in compliance with what he felt to be his duty, as well as in accordance with that particular line of support which he, in common with the other members of his family, had afforded to the just claims of his Roman Catholic countrymen, offer to the House an explanation of the grounds upon which he had resolved to resist the fur ther progress of the second Bill—the Intercourse with Rome Bill. He had witnessed, with more satisfaction than he was able to express, the moderate and con ciliatory tone by which the discussion throughout had been distinguished ; and by none, he was bound to acknowledge, were that moderation and disposi tion to conciliate more steadily adhered to than by' , the Right Hon. Member for the University of Oxford. However, he was desirous of following the same course, not more on account of the example of the friends and the adversaries of this great measure, than by the persuasion that a temperate and impar tial consideration of the subject would prove most serviceable to the cause itself. Whilst he professed a zeal equal to that of any man in or out of Parlia ment, for the furtherance of this great measure, and whilst he was prepared to yield to any demand of sacrifice which could be made upon his own feelings in the service of that measure, he feared that he should prove the innocent cause of disturbing the harmony in which it had hitherto proceeded, and thereby lessen the hopes of its advocates. His friends had even surrounded him, to beseech him to desist; and, even since he had taken his seat that evening, he had received several anonymous letters to the same effect, representing to him that his opposition to the second Bill would only have the effect of embarrass ing the progress of the measure ; that it would be the means of totally taking away all the hopes of the Roman Catholics; and it was even insinuated that, by this opposition, he would be disserring his own interests. With respect to the latter consideration, he begged to say, that on no occasion did he give it a preference: over the considerations of duty ; and, 'least of all, didihe take into his contemplation what course of conduct would be most -advantageous to himself on the present question, which, to consider it rightly, should always be considered as a question involving equally the interests of all classes of the empire—(Hear, hear).—k the first Bill it was ueed litss to say that he gave his unqualified support ; b nt accompanied as it was wi.h a Bill o f securities, suc h as those contained in the second Bill, he should b e under the painful necessity of refusing to accept it, on the part of the Roman Catholics—(Hear, hear). —lt was his general principle, that no securities were necessary ; but, if he could be brought to accede to any securities, these certainly would not be such as he should sanction. The question then wa s , could no other securities be devised but those which affected exclusively the Rom'an Catholic Priesthood? Wherefore was it that the Clergy should be selected to give the hostages, whilst the lay community en joyed the benefit? He considered that the clauses of the second Bill were penal in effect ; they were allowed to be so by some of his friends, who would sanction the temporary injustice to the Clergy by the prospect of these securities being abolishes' by the act of a more enlightened Parliament—(Ncar,frorn Mr. Peel). The clauses were, in the first place, ob. jectionable, because they were to have an e.r postfacta effect; for the first clause required that every person of the Roman Catholic Religion now exercising cleri cal functions should subscribe an oath. The clause was next objectionable, because it was penal. Let the House look to the nature of the oath, and then let them consider that a penalty was to be affixed to the offence of not taking that oath. What that pe nalty was—whether it was transportation or impri. sonment, he did not know. He would ask, where • was the law hitherto which compelled any man to take an oath? He knew many respectable persons, not Roman Catholics, but Protestants, who scrupled to take an oath ; and he knew of one instance of a party foregoing a considerable loss, in consequence of refusing to take an oath. Ma doubt the measure which had been so triumphantly carried, after a dis cussion of it, which, for temperance and concilia tion, did honour to all parties, was pregnant 'aids benefits. Bnt after having thrown open the Houses of Parliament to Roman Catholics—after having opened to them some of the great offices, wine a libe ral hand, why did they stop short and make it the condition of their generous concessions, that they should receive the securities which this Bill could place in their hands? Why should they do thi . , un der any circumstances? And why, most of all, should they do it, on account of the motive which they professed, namely, that there were some unrea sonable Protestants in the country that would not be satisfied without them? He had another objection to the Bill—that it gave what he would call the Veto , to the King, in the appointment of Bishop , . And the clause of this Bill, with respect to that power, was distinguished from the corresponding measure of 1813, in this respect, that in the latter, the Gra; verement was bound to assign the cause of disloy. alty and disaffection in every instance where the power of rejection was exercised; whereas, the clause of the present Bill directed that the rejection should be accompanied by the statement of a some reason of a civil nature." He begged to observe that the House—at least that great part of it which was not conversant with the domestic condition of Ireland— was not aware of the nature of the interest which he was endeavouring to advocate at that moment.— There was not, in the Empire, a more respectable, or a more useful body of men, than the Irish Ro man Catholic Clergy—(Hear). None could be more anxious, and none more efficient in the preserva tion of the public peace, and in setting the affec. tions of the People upon the Government—(Hear). r They were the voluntary promoters of tranquillity and loyalty ; and, in the power to promote both, Go vernment could not look to better agents. Consider. ing all these circumstances, he was entitled to say, that nothing could be more injudicious and oppres sive than to call upon those meritorious individuals ' who wished to be left as they were—who desired no interference to drag them from their peaceful retreats —the scenes of their useful labours, and hold them up to the members of their own religion, as the men who,.by a mistakes, sense of duty, or wantonly reins. ing to make some inconsiderable sacrifices, in coder that the Lay community might =be placed upon a better political footing. The Clergy of Ireland cort sisted of four Archbishops, 25 Bishops, 1100 Parish Priests, 800 Curates, and between 200 and 500 Re gulars. And was such a body as this to be made die object of penal visitation, in order to balance the cat. cession of privileges to the Laity ? The R Ot• tholic Clergy of Ireland could boast, besides, c m inie , the most ancient Priesthood of the three kin s; and how did the House think to justify itseff in its treatment of a body having such high claimsoo their attention, in the present era of moderation, justice* and conciliation ? In the whole Penal Code, nothing more repulsive occurred than this compulsory direc tion to the Priesthood to take an oath. One of the most able and eloquent supporters of the Bill (the Member for Bramber), alluded with some espressons of apprehension to the existence of a College ofJesues in England. He begged to state, that the establish ment adverted to was not recognized canonically as an establishment ofJesuits, the Pope having objec tal to sanction the existence of any such establishment, s because the . Government of England would not sanc tion it. The words of his Holiness were-- °l' d° . &details Jesu non est restorata, quaint° guidon? r Anglia gubernicurn non vult."—(Hear, hear)..- 1 ." C lion for the instruction llete, in f i a n c t t t , to w tt as n of perm y i o tt n e t. permitted merely ya b s e a an dth m i s u ntn e. i ti was a digression, but such a one as he hoped House would not deem unuseful. He was serey . 111 . 1 ; his opposition was likely to throw impediments lath way of the Bill, but his duty made it incumbent es t h e him to make it. He would, however, put i d n ßight e t Hon. atisfi M e de with ber anything tb O i x o f g or s d h , ort w hoefthtehre de he wef t ra o don of the Roman Catholic Clergy in Ireland. A s yet he had received no information of anygeet b ul u g t of the Clergy having taken place in that country, he was strong in asserting that such Meetings w p t 0 :1 become general throughout all Ireland. would atislsisurßeilth,etlheroeuftoer,et,bsnotletliyiefrsotrmonpgreisntcfiepelelioligHepeciPrewou this amongst ßi l l. the H Prelacye consideredan d C it le p rg re y gn o a f and would give it all the opP,ositton in his pow er. ban Lord CASTLEREAGII said, hadile induced him to have supported those c ► 0 . thought them insulting or iniurioireto the . enuf .. of the Catholic Clergy of Ireland'. Bdt, in hi s t.ei gr . nltrewlainthd da.eranga.Bl:l: necessary to the union of the two great lig b s o j e " cu i u e r i r s securities gria .as Catholics and Protestants of the two coulltlia* odd not seer l e -Clergy; eitl f e elings; for chi allowed - them tc Te nni clauses, ti to the Catholic r esent law, the their correspond b e inselves to p ev esi perhaps, a vatillation of Di think the talents eentlernan, in h In Ireland, were sepose of the Ca the doctrine, tha functions, until Catholic Priests first oath, he th( thins Catholic Cl pope had distill( the British Legi from him which lie Powers. Thl pies, but these s, He assured the I tion was propose tion of all panic able Gentleman, with the Pope v the other Protet heavier securities man would do h and prejudices w to exist. The No the Relief of th passed twenty-fiv ting out, met wid those Clergy thet Presbyterians we that Bill, and he I attend this measu derstood in Irelan entreated the Hoi tion, from a pers, the worst conseqi measure—(Hear, Dr. PHILLIM for the success of for it unless these faith of which thi to be removed fro ber (Mr. Plunket would not ask the out demanding di Mr. PEEL said by the expression c the Pope at his ba those who were nc The duty of himsel painful one, in Of but do not let then having attempted t Catholics, Mr. M. FITZGI should, if possible they ought also to lion to the Catholic the Catholic Cleri dissimilar from dm regulation of the it third, a restriction did not find fault It was taking them who derived no bet liament; and requi *ere to receive a r out giving anything duct of the Calla a great measure, I therefore, that hod think of insulting, lie was, therefore, of the Catholic Cli ant Administration perusal of Mr. Bu raisthievous interfi Mr. CANNING Irt6ng in any man popularity which n Latter part of the 1 lily he might have ♦ions part of it. ineasnre was to 1 pion, of co-opera *scare of the state 4 tounication of the I Bee?.—and if they tinue them when fc any man were now Concessions, he gm , candour on the pa Would have a right bringing them to. by promising them second part of it. a fraud ; and as hi tions to obtain eman he would, with equa if these concessions Sir G. HILL said measure, for the inte pass into a law, he ciliate the opinions I Mr. It. MARTIN if they had known. Clergy were hostile fipatio,n would have st now was ? Irle ha would most probabl the next Election lot should successfully Charter of Emancip Bishops never thouj to their religious b Merely as conveniern of the Rornish Chun 11:0:gkhta they Mr. BARING co I .)een cast o n the Ho re m n a O f r u a g u i d a temo all the se Mr. CANNING s; the opinions out o f < Mr. BARING w