Star. — London, England, 1823-05-24 00:00:00

idirltlNDU HOUSE, April nO, 1223. TIM COURT of DIRECTORS of Ilie 11 NIT'Ea COMP.AAV e IIfERCffA.VTSof ENGLAND, trading to tin , FAST-L \DIES, do herein / g i&e Notice, That the Court will be ready to receive Proposals in writing, at any time on or before W. 11:1)XF.S14,t V, the £sth of June. next. from any Person or Persons who may be willing to Build, either in the River Thames, or 'it an Outport in England or Water s ', a SHIP or SHIPS, of a 1 nut 11013*Tons burthen, to is Let on Freight for the said Company's Service, for Sig Voyages cer tain, specifying, in one itrm, a permanent Peace Freight for Ca - eh of the said Six Voyages. _ The Tenders, with the words " Ship Tender" on the cover. to be severally sealed up and left with the Secretary, at this 14nute, at nr tufo* TWelve o'Clock at Noon, on the said 28th of lune neat ; beyond which hour no Tender will be received. JOSEPH DART, Secretary. The•particulars of the principal Dimensions and Scantling% of the Ships. an Inventory of the principal Stores, the Copy of the Charter Pasty for each Voyage, as an outline, together with the other Terms and Conditions upon which the Ships are to be tendered, hulk, and employed in the Company's Service, way be had upon application at the Office of the Clerk to the (:ninmittee of Shipping, on or after Thursday, the 15th day of Nay pest __- TO THE PROPRIETORS OF EAST INDIA STOCK. Lama atm Getsrtsitut, ALLOW me to solicit your attention to thraccom puling Resolutions, which were ?sited at a numerous and must respectable Meeting Tuts PAT, at the City of Lon don Tavern. After the very &Meting sentiments conveyed in these Reso lutions, I feel that any expressions of my own would only weaken their force ; I will not, therefore, presume to add a word on the subject of my pretensions; bur, should they be favourably re ceived, jpiedge nsysvirto the most faithful and zealous ezettions for the interests of the East India Company. I have the honour to be, most respectfully, Ladies and Gentlemen, Your faithful and obliged Servant, • •J. PETTY MUSPRATT. New Bresi.street, May '2.5, 1823. • A'T a Numerous and most Respectable MEET -41 iAG of PROPRIETORS of EAST INDIA STOCK, . . held at the CITY or LoNnoti Tarim+, on Friday the 23d of May, 11123 ; The Bight Hon. Lord Viscount EXDIOUTH, G.C.B. in the Chair. was proposed by Sir CHARS.= Fldwas, Bt. Seconded by DAVID !sinus, Esq. and Resolved Unanimously, That with a view to the most efficient administration of the' East India Company's Affairs, it has been frequently urged and admitted, that the (Cart of Directors should be composed of a due proportion of their Civil, Military - , and Naval Servants; anti, as the Company is essentially Commercial, being itl o truth " The United Company of hlerebants of Englund trading to the Eta !tidies,* it is, in the opinion of this Meeting, equally twee*. &try, and of the drat importance to the interests of the Proprie tors, that the Court of Directors should alsonontain a doe pro portion of Merthants of acknowledged talents, integrity, and perience. IL—lt was proposed by Sir CHAILIS COCKZILILL, Bart. M.P. Seconded by Cus.at.ss Foams, Esq. M.P. and Resolved Unanimously, That this Meeting consider Joint Parry Musraarr, Esq. well qualified fora Seat in the Direction of the Company's Affairs, not only from his long mercantile experience, but from his in dustrious habits and general acquirements as a practical man of bite/nem Upset these grounds they strongly recommend Mr. nusrasrr to the favourable consideration of the Proprietors; and they are the more confirmed in the expediency of this re ccimmendation, when they advert to the Company's having been in the last few years deprived of several Mercantile Members of thpir Executive Rudy. I was proposed by Jenne Hume, Esq. M.P. Seconded by JOHN BLADSII, Esq. and Resolved Unanimously, That upon the principles of the foregoing Resolution this Meet ing do colls.-etively and individually pledge themselves to support and to exert their influence in favour of Mr. MUSTRArei vreU founded pretensions to a Seat in the Direction; and . that they will use their best endeavours to promote his Alec-dim open a future Vacancy. EX hl OUT 111, Chairman. .041 - 1 1211. Foam, Esq. M.P. having subsequently taken the Chair, It was proposed by the TIM BAWL Coetrasys, seconded by Sir Join E Hasnioron, Bart. and Resolved Unanimoudy, That the Thanks if this Meetit.g be given to the Right Hon. Lord VISCOIIai Unworn for his able conduct in the Chair. nu COLOMBIAN LOAN. The fluctuations in Columbian Bonds during the lest two days were created by the receipt of letters of a very important tenor from the seat of Go vernment, which gave strong hints of the contract being unPkely to be recognised by the Republic. A number of the holders, in consequence of the alarm, %tithed upon the Contractors, who merely replied to the inquiries, that they had received no advice'. A similar answer was also given by M. RAVZROR. By the arrival 'of a Jamaica mail we have received ad vice: from Colombia to the end of February, which throw considerable light on the subject of this Loan. It appears from the Santa Fl Gmatte of the Bth of February,'that a report was made by PORO Gum., Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, and Joss MARIA DV. CASTILLO, Minister of Finance, on the subject of the late Loan contracted by Mr. Zia, for two millions sterling. The report, which combines other subjects of finance, occupies ten folio pages, but the following is the substance of the part relative to the:Loxn.:— • ", That. the Celombian Loan of two millions, con tracted by Mr. Zss, is contrary to the Laws of the Republic ; that the Executive Government had n• aothOkity to grant, nor did they actually grant, any powers to Mr. ZZA, by virtue of which such a Loan could legally have been contracted; and consequently the -contract for the Loan does not bind the Republic. 1 That - all debts contracted must be allowed by.tlAe Board of Liquidation, appointed by the laws for that etpress purpose, before they can be considered as le gal demands against the Republic ; that consequently the debts of I:540,000 and upwards, recognized by Mr:ZIA and a Committee of his appointment in London, and afterwaFds incorporated w ith the Loan, are not acknowledged debts; and that this sum la 'chided upwards of - £66,000 lent to Mr. ZZA tors* own personal accommodation. • g , That Mr. ZLA has pledged the Duties of 'aspens' and Expects, the Revenue from the Gold and Silver and Salt Mines, and' the Monopoly of Tobacco, as Security for the principal and interest of the 1 4 ,04 k.,: in short, all the most productive sources of Remote - -4.50 as to render die supply of the Most urgent wants of Republic impracticable, if the Loan should tie recognized. • The-Colorabias GO,CTRINSVIS wilifstrbiisb a state- , .• meat of facts, which will shew to if). World , and 'frankly, the cititinistances totusetted opt tbits,' aingsdar.proceedings, docurnena erillftrakefrot" foundation and vindication of its decision williktiefeW etme to the Lettn." • . • - ' • PARLIAMENTARY viocz Tnnvas. , • nqusa Oar LtuE Itt4Y es. %:.• Counsel were called in abolt ten o'etire when the Attorney. Geveral was heard out in thooppeaFpf-m James Duffy. the FAIR of FM," and. Mr. clerk followed ha part, after which the "further hearing was adislOna till to-Yogi! Av. At twenty minutes to Dior o*cloeir; the` Doke of Mosyraoint, the Loaq,Qtascati,ort, and the, lisrl of §,starrnauftv at robed as Lordirettibmissinners for notifying and declaring the Royal ~Assent to divers Bills which had been arreed upon by both Houses of Parliament ; and the Yeonia i..l.lsber was directed to require the attendance of the Commoas ; soon after which he returned with the Ste/Aces, Mr. Baehr x, and seven more hi embers . of The `tithe t House, at ten de biy their - Ofliter s, when the Commission was read (signed by the King himself, with his own hand, this 23d day of May. at Westminster), and his Ala-' ! jesty's Assent was given to the undermentioned Rills, which were passed by the Clerks of this House with the prescribed forms, namely— Tbe Union Duties Bill, the Militia (Ireland) Reduction Bill, the Magistrates' Quorum Bill, the Airpreriticeships Regulation Bill, the Severn Bridge Bill, the Southwark (Parish of St. Sa viour's) Alai ket Bill, the Knaresborough, the Rochdale, and the Belfast Gas light lulls, the Dublin New" Gas Company's Bill, the Liverpool and the Maidstone Gas Light Bills, a very large number of Road Bills, the Canterbury Roads' Lighting Bill, the Durham. Oxford, and Westmoreland Inclosure Bills, tlO Stockton Railway Rill, and Allardyce's I)ivorce Bill, amounting altogether to 46 Bills. Petitions were presented for the entire Abolition of Slavery in the British Colonies. _ Mr. BLCIGDCN and others, in consequence of a message from their Lordships, brought up a copy of the Report of the Select Committee of the other House (Ifni), respecting Weights and Measures; which, upon the motion of Viscour.t Mazvizza, were ordered to be printed for the use of this House. Admiral Maoism, Mr. H. Somoza, Dr. PUILLSMOIII, Mr. S. Rsca,Sir J. GRAHAM, and others, brought up several Bills. The Commercial (Ireland) Intercourse Bill was read a third dine, passed, and messaged to the other House. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY gave notice of his In tention to move the second reading of the New Marriage Bill on Tuesday nest; and their Lordships were ordered to be sum moned for that day, The Duke of NEWCASTLE presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Newark, praying that no further concessions might be granted to Roman Catholics. Lord MINTO presented a Petition from the County of Roe- I burgh to the same eirect. Upon the motion of the Earl of Donoichratoaa, their Lord ships now proceeded to the Order of the Day, and went into a, Committee on the Cbunty (Ireland) Treasurers Bill, in which some few amendments were proposed and agreed to; when the clause, ingrossed by mistake in the Bill as originally sent up by the Commons, was expunged: Some conversation took plase between Lords Cazzoon, Dor ',WV, CLAIM, and Doasouolosoaa ; after which the DUI was reported as amended (by substituting the January for the Mi chaelmas Quarter, and putting the October Sessions in sequence with the Assizes), and the Bill was ordered to be read a third HOUSE OF COMMONS. At a quarter to four o'clock the Deputy Usher of the Black Rod appeared at the Bar, and summoned the House to the House of Peers. Upon the Semites return he informed the flour that the Royal Assent bad been given to certain Bills (for which see the Lords' Bern.) Mr. BYNG presented a Petition from certain Table Beer Brewers against the Beer Bill. Also a similar Petition from Thomas Spring—Ordered to Reopen the table. Sir C. MORGAN presented a Petition from a certain Magis trate of the county of Monmouth, in favour of the 'Bill then before the House for a revision of the Laws respecting Masters and, Servants. After a few words from Mr. P. Moose, the Petition was or tiered to be printed. Mr. DAWSON moved, that there be hid before the House Copies of the Report of the Commissioners appointed to inquire into the Courts of Justice in England.—Ordered. Mr. JER VANE presented a Petition from the Owners and Occupier; of Lends in the county of Hants against the Game Laws at present existing.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. DENISON presented a Petition frost the'Llhabitarits of the Borough of Southwark, praying that the Duty on Beer may be repealed, and that the Duty may be transferred to Halts —Ordered th be printed. Mr. S. WHITBREAD presented' a Petit* from the Inks-' bitants of Uxbridge, against Slavery in the West Indies.—Or dered to lie upon the table. Mr. LINDSAY presented a Petition from cartels Linen Ma. nufacturers of the Works of Kenmuir spinet the Scotch Linen and Hempen Canvas Bill. After some ebeervations from Mr. S. Woathalre Mr. PHILLIPS Sir R. Fthaoson and Mr. Mummy, the Petition was brought up, read, ordered to lie on the table, and be printed. A Message was delivered from the Lords, communicating the assent of their Lordships to several public and private Bills. IRISH INQUIRY. Mr. CALCRAFT moved - the Order of the Day for proceeding in the inquiry into the conduct of the Sheriff of Dublin. Lord CRANBORNE made some observations. which were inaudible in the gallery, and moved as an Amendment the Order of the Day for the second reading of the Sale of Game Bill. Mr. CALCRAFT said, that the Noble Lord was surely noking game of the House in putting the, Game Law into competition with the inquiry. No' object could be answered by delaying the proceeding in that inquiry, and he had moved. it in order to further the business of the House, became a great number of witnesses were • waiting to be examined, and the great inconvenience which delay would cause to the Public, as well as thy great expense which it would entail on the Public, required that the business should be decided one way or the other. To stop the inquiry. at a moment when the Sheriff wasin the nitddle of his defence was such a proceeding as he believed had never been heard of in a Conn of Jus tice, and as he certainly bad never before heard of in that House. He hoped, therefore, that the Noble Lord would withdraw his Amendment, and let the Order of the Day be read as a matter of course. Mr. PEEL would assure his Noble Friend, that he was as anxious as he could be that the subject of the Game Laws should be submitted , to the - House, but he could not help thinking, that if they were to pro ceed at all in this inquiry; it was necessary, in every point of view, .to pfoceetl immediately. He had• seen, the other day, the bill of one witness, which had amounted to EWA, and he had not been in Lon don snore than twenty-one days. He thought. that was a cogent argument .either to close the proceed ings entirely, or te_proceed that night. Lord CRANBORNE withdrew his Amendment. Colonel BARRY said, that he agreed with every I other Gentleman in wishing that this inqniry should be brought to a speedy conclusion. But on Wednes day evening the Honourably Member for Knaresbo rough would not give up his - motion; yesterday, the Honourable Member for Bridgenorth would not give up his; and, if tip House had not interfered, he be lieved that he should bare met with the same deter. .urination in every Member who had a motion for the lest week. He *VA 'therefore, thankful to the Ho nourable Meallier tar hislipsiasaoce. The time whit • examination of his witnesses might take Woo nne so much -4frpmW ippon himself, as upon those tlemen who tk - it Itllirevent view of the subject 1 1 .. 1 1i,m4C. TOafarAila negeallri tar. the di- j eilie.li e Lspetsie d eapyaithe than five minutes,. but .iii the whale erautd depend entirely cm tier OZ*Minatioll. Mr.,S.IE sukgested, that many witnesses might be relieved from the inconvenience of attendairce, if the Gentlemen on both sides would enter into some arrangement amongst- themselves. It was evident that many witnesses were in attendance who were 'not likely to be wanted; and if they were allowed to return, a great service would be rendered to them; ands great saving to the Public. Sir J. GRAHAM said, that, in his opinion, the inqnisy might be stopped without the least inconve nience. • He was. sure that they had all heard enough of the case, and if they proceeded fatther thermight go on for sit months, because the evidence of each witness rendered it necessary to call other witnesses. He thought it would he better to put an end to it at once, and he would therefore move that the Oi der of the Day be read that day six months. Lord MILTON said, that the proposal of the Ho nourable Baronet was mist cxuaordinary. The House had resolved upon. an inquiry into the con duct of the Sheriff; that inquiry had commenced, and an Honourable Gentleman on the other side had opened the defence: would it then be proper to step the inquiry while that Honourable Gentleman was is the middle of his defence? Mr. Secretary CANNING said, that although he had originally opposed the inquiry, yet having once commenced, he could not consent to stop it, as long as any Gentleman on either side could say that he had any material evidence to offer. Unquestionably no man felt more than himself the inconvenient si-, tnation into which the House had brought itself, and, vrithout passing any.opiniou, he might fairly state, that the inquiry had not answered the expectations of the Gentlemen on either side ; Iva whilst any question remained to be asked, he should be adverse to a termination. Sir J. NEWPORT thought, that it would be im possible to terminate the inquiry whilst the Sheriff was in the middle of his defence. Mr. S. BOURNE suggested, that no witnesses should be summoned in-addition to those in England. Colonel BARRY said, that he would now state, that lie should feel it his duty, in the event of any witness whom he called not appearing, to move that the Chairman be insntitted - to move the House that such witness. be committed to the custody of the Serjearlt at Arms. . Sir J. GRAHAM withdrew his Atnendment, and the House resolved itself into a Committee. Colonel BARRY then moved, that Gabriel Whist ler be called to the Bar.—The witness was called, but did not appear. Colonel BARRY said, that the name of this wit ness had 'been included in the list whfch had been put into the hands of the Hpnourable. Member for Westminster, and he had been s i ummoned in conse quence; but that he had then written to the Speaker, informing him that he was Sub-Sheriff, and as both the Sheriffs, as well as Mr. Mansfield, his own clerk' were then in London, he could not leave his office. Mr. Mansfield bad now returned to Dublin, and suf ficent time had elapsed 'for the attendance of the wit ness. He should therefore move, when the House resumed, that an Order should be issued for com mitting the said Mr. Whistler to the custody of the Serjeant at Arms. - • Mr. M. A. TAYLOR said, that it would be ne cessary first.to prove that the Order of the House had been served. Mr. WYNN thought, that in this case such proof was not necessary. Mr. BROUGHAM said, that this case was of great importance. He thought that it *a.; necessary to shew that the Order had been served. Did that fact appear upon the Votes? It was a matter which ought to be inquired into by testimony. Sir J. NEWPORT said, that the Order of the House for the attendance, in the fit st instance, had never been discharged. Mr. BROUGHAM said, that the only question then was as to the right or discretion. As to discre tion, no one could doubt, that when the House waved the Order for attendance, in consequence of the letter of Mr. Whistler, it rendered a new order necessary. Mt. Gifford, the messenger, was then called in and examined by Colonel BAaav, as to the service of the notice. He stated that be had served the notice at the office of Mr. Whistler, and that Mr. Mansfield hid then been present. Mr. ABERCROMBY suggested that a new order . iliould be seat, commanding immediate attendance. Mr.WYNN thought that the Hausa should resume, rder that they might save that evening's post. The SPEAKER, afprr.givingjiis opinion on the point of hum, said that he rose to suggest that the chairman of the Committee should be instructed to make soy, report. Aker • some further conversation the House re mused, and Sir R. Hitaon reported progress, and stated, that the witness had not answered, in obedi ence to the order tsf the House. Mr. Gabriel Whistler was ordered to attend the House on Wednesday next, on the motion of Sir R. /fano*, upon the instruction - of the Committee. The House having gone into a CoMmittee, fleory Charles Bin was called im—lie said he was Town' Major of the city of Dublin, and n Police Magistrate. Ptevienn to the visit of the Lord Lieutenant to the Theatre., the public irritation was considerable. It was caused by the prevention of the dressing of the Statue. lie thought that feeling might haye heels increased by the committal of some persons charged with a capital crime. The committal war prOcured principally by the Crown Offiessa 7 the Attorney am.t Fadicitor-General, and Mr. Townshaid. He was not aware r until he was desired to , make out a committal, that the charge was of a appal nature. Whores did-not know the exact description of the offence.botini the committal was finally prepared. Them was a variety if in formations upon the subject; but artiness, though he saw most of them; did not see thefts all. After the witnemes were soroen, the hiagistrate was soonetinses ordered tuleaye the room. Prra. Sons were bound over to prosecute previously to the committal of Forbes. Witness cooctiaes,from the directions which he mil. calved horn high authorhy, .that, Forks was anicoabie to tho i capital charge. lie could not hive committed Forbes upon tlin alpha charge, without thole directions, pon his, own authority. py Mr. JONE3.--r.f .was not brehight up a lawyer. I had doubts as to whether the evidence amounted tars capital charge.- ' Was-it in ronstridence of the opinicou delivered by the Law Officers of the Crown that you committed Forbes upon a pi pits( charge? The witness was ordered to withdraw. Mr. BROUGHAM objected to thin course of ex pmination, ,as putting into the mouth of 'the witness tingtage which he had Pevtr used, and foundingin ferenses upon that assumption. Mr.JONES=The H en . an 4 Learned Gentleman Is doubtlessly a great authority in the.Cemmittee, at least in his own ofpihloii. • Mi. BROUGHAM . ...--Certaitily pqt; relies!' pa-. 'thing .upon my own opinion, but I ulljeci.cal in ques.. tion the like of which I never heard, not merely ;u m a lawyer but a layman. Mr. JONES seed that e was tarry to draw drtw il the mighty wrath and sal elm of the Honourable:m.l Learned Gentleman ; hou evil., it should have dump. pression upon him. Mr. BROUGHAM explained that he had not corn. menced this very tiresome conversation. It teas` b t Hon. Member who first charged him with bein g mighty authority in his own opinion. lie was sum that be had never applied such language to any Member in that Huttse‘ The wittiest vain returned. By Mr. Bisouctratk.—l did not apply fut the spatrneg* of the Law Officers of the Crown, but they were tenderetrogs.. in my capacity as a Magi s tr a te. I h a v e b een a•Poliea 11,8%"' trate fifteen years ; I was a Magistrate before for about theme*, of nine years. It Las not been my practice *wart - % rem instructions of the Officers of the Crown; In all cuss(tiz myself bound not to exercise my owe judgment. bufitifollosade! 'instructions and advice of the Law Mans of the C1 . 01%1440 he, as Crown prosecutions are concereed,at least wherever law to the Officers of the Crown. What do you mean by resdrting? (A /an paean,) • 1 Did g nu ge to the Crown Officers yourrelf?—UnsleliA. I went sometimes to the Solicitor for the Crown ; happen that I event to the Crown Officers withou& goingos t ai,.. Crown Solicitor. If a man were arrested for sedition, I de* take the in i fprznations and it would then be f or t h e (See r Lawyers to proceed. I should not hesitatempon comrili tt h ikt sedition, where I felt there vAs no. doubt. In inch curse* present f act upon the instructions I rective. What do you mean by following the instructions of ticfr Cre w Lawyers?— Where many were concerned, for instance, ?haw their instructions as to those to be detsirted. But after you commit thorn, do you follow then ink —(No answer.) Suppose a question was to arise as to the amount at balll4 should he guided by their Instructions; but only ast litical offences.--(The witness complained of fatigue, outlast* was ordered). An objectioa *as here mode by CoL Waal- to this aft* steal etamination.. Mr. B k OUG HA M—Of all terms under the sun, the wad " metaphysical," a it applies to such an examination, sons to roc the least applicable. it is a plain practical question, and cv Ae of a plain answer. The witness having recovered from his exhaustion, • _.,., • tl i Suppose the question ar ose as to t h e amount of bail, wean' a l advice should govern you?--That of the Assistant Barrister is the office along .wlth me. I take advice from Lawyers indiseri , reinately ; this has been my practice for 15 years ; I never took ' the advice of the .Counsel for the 'prisoner ; I take the advice of the Barristers employed by the Police, bet more frelseetlon arductus matter; I follow the advice of the Crown Lawyers. Suppose infornittion had been lodged, that a person used a seditious expression, or drank a disloyal toast, how should you act ?-31ake•my report to the Crown Lawyers. Suppose then, in such a case, you thought that the person charged ought not to stand committed, world you, if desired by the troWn LaWyers, commit hint 7-.71 should, certainly. Suppose, upon the.evidence laid before you, in your opinlna there was not evidence to commit, and 'impose the offence mot a bailable one, and that you weer desired by Government to commit him, would you do sod--I should follow the advice of Government. Upon the ques t ion as to t h e amount of hail is • State offences, I should follow the direction of Government. I do not do so in other cases; such as larcenies. By Mr. Pao.—l am bound in some cases to adopt the opt- nion pf the Attorney-Genet 1. I am bound by law in Nets& cases uto the admission of all approver, in cases of High Tres. I son, lay the opinion of the Attorney - Ge nera:.neral. • 1 By Mr. Baoconsn.—There is nothing in the Act under; which I am invested with authority which makes it necessary to consul; the Government as to committing a person charged with any crime. fly Air. G. Lanz—l had not made up my mind to Write .1 offence for which I should 'commit the rioters. By Mr. Batruar.—The Act of Parliament desires mete com municate with Government; but Ido not recellect that it eiders 'me to receive Instructioni from Government. I signed Be de positions which I did not see. By Mr. S. WiillTLET.—The . petvos were taken up t cm spiraey to murder ; and from what I saw of the information before me, I did not think . thereivai enough to commit *M. If left to myself, I should not commit diem for more these:SO- ',piracy or riot. -I had instructions from the LAW Officers to commit for the conspiracy to nurdei, and I considered there • must have been Nomething.liefore their, to take such a course: By a Mnsaaa.—One information will jintily a committal; but if there were more than one, we could not come* without reading all. I should not r e d all the informations: I canal dered it a capital offence when the Attorney-General se coati , dered it. Several informations were given at another which I afterward:, saw, besides thine in the first Westin Wort myself. Ido not recollect if I saw all the informatioos; Ira.; saw a great many. Has it been your habit to• see all the informations previous is coMMittal for a serious offence ?—Always. Then this is the only instance in Which you committed id& out such previoua intormations?—No; I can recollect Wane but do not remember all the circumstances. My memory has been impaired. fly Sir J. Naverawr.—Did you act differently in this use to asp other with respect to your communications to Governusesst -NO, Sir. By Mr. Daowxxow.—Did you propose to have bail Wit! far Mr. gorhes?-(Answer unheard).— Witness ordered to ~alt John Gabbelt was then called io.—Baamined by Cal BMW. . Witness was a Magistrate is, that division of Dublin in truck; the Theatre Royal and the statue of King William wise skated. He remembered &great deal 9f irritation had precedodaht _at at the Th eatre. He recollected individuals being WOll4O Wee were collected round the statue. None of the civil pow/wire then present. Thoididividuale alluded to had been wounds 4 the miLitaiy. Wit ness h a d comm i tted certain person i with conspiracy to kill and murder the Lord Lieutenant. Mod thought there were grouuds for referring the case to &JIM Y the committal of parties accused were recomineu d r d by ilk Oil vernment he should be 'disposed to yield to their wisli j tellibe log little inconvenience could then arise, as the panic! *Jkit subsequently be bailed before a Judge as Chambers, who fral,m.i• tliorised to decide upon this groinds on which a camping" , taken place. . . By 11r. coutainitt—Mr. Toviniond, the Coapiel e f.t!* Fp' sent when witness signed.the cosonalaal. . Hy Sir J.' Ninrsoax.—Wu made a Magistrate lif a .. which he had writtesi-twenty.yeen ma.. - , / ..,' . 'ri By hir. Ps.umurtn.-There trete two or_ three per on the statue on the night ot the riot, hat itwas M. . , • witness could not se t who they were. It has since brit that Henry Handy/ids' was one. By Colonel BA aar.—Hass- no *collection of any riatibille: • statue previous to July last.. • •,.. • By Mr. Baorrutow.—Firen . ,Aclpfonttation Office, the witness woutel npt a if ogllligno bit- P. . • have committed the accused. Bit there were other . taken at other Offices, and before the Law Gainers entre E If he had had• to d ecide uni on his owe discretion , 1' shieldshield wai hive committed epics the inforeratione ha had taken V ~,_..• then have formed a more deliberate set, andlizot telem!!' all the informations to be laid Wore him. - • - • '' . • • The witness was then orderetlto withdraw. ..*• - • ''' • ' • Pasco Field caPed lianctereiiiiied Sy Compel Basi_igt„ . : been hi a room of the Cattle,-andlein the Attorney-uneeM some other Gentlemedr a Mr. Calirelaraiel;•the Tsseioitsfebtry, Crown was there. • Hid • attire . hal tit* been al lliesitlYnor not &rote** la dttli oirsitte,'sir bein'tdreerned lei 6111 0111 v eeediogr. Wftlirairti aiillitii 0 1 1 recitibliffeb . b4lhigr u : suds questions - habit* . tp4ini? 'Hitt ier . d• he ?itidssorl... ' ;lout cdrivorliatloriiiir fet"ificPlLosed . Vayernii '. • go deessfreg of ihrilltattii, - Ilsekbeett ihtivit -11 • efused-td sieves tfserdlttiof firlbit',t , 4. :. .../.:: it origtnalititK:„ • . ' By Mr: Otitibilfaal.Pler':ikidi rt . * ~ ~-. ~ when witnesi'W# exandwed. 1 ".... ''' • • . * Mi. .7611 ML —Had madiOnse t iastfaiiditi - ' • ... x. - - ppt to him. Had' talc at lirit r ihat* - Ili* so effete tuba marfivall:i::', , , thrdiigli the linne t -_,, ,-- , position ', hewn to lilsix, li:. had Veda Miffii - to 1 1 11 1 ; f.s. ffix, n ,, more of it than a effixn or tile stolid / ' - ' • Wittlani Wird i — Wks atdlkirriFihtdAtenttfiy..= l . told by the Sheriff he hod ieceived *leiter fritiaVir General about the impanelling of a J , sad the .said he.meant to ft'erd i fair laid . • . with f ht besEimi