Star. — London, England, 1817-07-21 00:00:00

SPORTINt IgTELLICENCE. 11:TNBURGH RACES AND MUSiELIWII.GII MEETING. MONDAY, !ULT 11. 1. A le:olti Cup, vu!tte 10ov. by ~gla Sulu•orihers of ICgs. each, with 90 g. a Ided. i htry mar,. .1 h e Martinis of 42tor.q,strerry'• brown c:yit 1 ittl: Thomas 1 ••r Matti vw White Ricllt•y's bross:i cut: Lucifer - . I 1 / \;r. Mieh.telson's blown !lily !Alta - - . - S k.ir 114:tut 's cbt--nut col: sna.lon ~'r..(:iefirpr 11:.w 44444 . 14 hfOiNtl . .:if,t• iitz•:ini:le - - ei.. :. li.crietstat of Su v. h) NAtlourft an.l Col:halal, for Isurbei, &c of ab ages. f:fr R. K. I)itk' grey horsy Outcry : w :. t;. 0 1,1)a , w,t.: 'e buy filly Lana 1 , 10 ,, :5h - A himod rJer, won by haff a styes. sos!u,Y, Juts - 15 1 • -t: _ 1. ; f:elne , s, given br the City ot Edlnhureh, `;>r !spreg, !tc. • .• won Plate or Stake ot ;Lac val.e, • I) na tusk in-er !liek'A bay mare Melia • - - .1 1 Ilavr.ott'e grey c .11!lyn • . 2 LYLtitsDAY, JULY 1.1. . . - . . Has 7 t,: , ..ty's Plate of lute gs fur horses, &c.—Furs mat !leafs. y r. (~ ii,,w•on'e blown Mose Fitz-Or.olle, .5 yrs old 1 I ;. ;up!' Of Quer...sherry's br. c. tie llsontas, yr 4-01,1 it dr taty-•-t z•UrviUr walked over for ere second heat. PottNn.—Saturday wonting a battle nook place in Copenhagen srrlds, bet weer. Try::o Baisrrx, , he little ISLA, (who had lately an Accidental iurn•ap with Caleb Bildwin at Coombe Wont:), v od s sturdy hole fellow, called Tom. It Was a tart of ttial to ascertain the (panties tor the Mack. Bristow answered to c especration formed of his talents, and beat his ;unagonis• in y•Isl style, in XI minutes. Belcher, Harry Harmer, and utl:tra he puyili-tit court, were no the smool Proacr ale ti ISM hatItAtUDIZtaKT-500 AIILRY ItACKwARD4 1 . 4 rrtrogratir t4.k, at Worm. wood Scrubs. On Saturday niplot, at • ee'cloeit, he cont• erred Y 7 i milts. Yesterday !monolog he str:ted At live, and at' tour in Om afternoon he had performed 2.1 nuke, fusing gone in the whole, dreg Id. conimencentent, 43fil miles; he has now but 61 miles to go to com pl ete his und e rt a kin g . Gaye, the hricldayer,nlPadolinctoo, foti.lseti on Saturday night a quarter berore tea, having w.ilkrd backwards that day thirty soles and a quarter. He commenced again yeteMay sisorning, :a five o'cloca, and at four in the afternoon., whets our report came away, he had performed miles, and was then proceeding on ra. &Ashy in the presentee art ,A.verel t'iotuAliti) of iliectatoirs. He walks backwards with a. one h ease and expedition as 'navy persons could forward, and we: hind the assistance of a rope. I.UDICI.JUS I s e DCS IA No.m.--onstardey a great CollenUfot or people assembled halootware-road, to witness , art ettoaordinary feat, undertaken by Jon:: Srlk.r.s, a labourer, residing at Westboutite, which was to w ilk tag miles in lour Lours, with Isis inkly and his left arm confined in a large flour rack, for r wager of ux guineas, and to pick up 300 moues Laid , %hien a yard of each te her, with which Ino was to reliant to a ba:ket laid at a certain distance. He commenced at twelve o'clock precisely, on a piece of ground half a mile over, at the back of the Red Lion tea-gardens; bets were 3to I against but. Hos first 'Lining afforded much mirth to the spectators, as fie was repeat e oaf falling down, and t xpersenced the greatest trouble in gettitsg )4. again; in the lirNt hour, however ' he had gone nee mile, and tegati to get more used to the sack. He finished hin task in three buurs and 40 nsinues, witoniog by 20 minutes. Wittosue, lute 20.—Yeociday afternoon a lung talked of foot-race took place, to run fore toiler in the Luny Walk, fur 50 soneas, be. wren M youth well known by the Hattie of the 4e.vrisir Bor. a:4 Joust W.rxreta., of Eton. started shout mar o'clock, when tite odds were g to 3, rod 5 to 4 oil the Ken. tosh Boy. Great bats were depending on the event, on both sides. 1 he race was extremely W.II COMalltad by both parties, and they accomplished the ..t.lUot., undertaking in little more than minutes, Wan .ell lora.ltaig his antagonist several yards. A great concourse o: people were i:toben:Ltird upon the occasion. Letters have been received from Lord Busrosts, •Nose house is sanAlvd immediately under blount CAleery, in Jeru ► slem ; he WAS Abut to proceed on a tour to DAMASCUS. No late accounts have been !MeiVett of Lord CRAVEN. York Assizes commenced on &tardily, and, from the number and nature of the crimes enumerated in the Calendar, they are expected to prove interesting. The Calendar contains the names of 69 prisoners -23 of whom are charged with tumultuary And insur. ”ctionary proceedings, in the neighboutliuod of Hud deri.field—seven with murder ; ,me tvith rapt; two malidons stabbing, ; five with burglary ; two with highway robber/ ; four, horse, slteep, and cattle stealing ; four stealing in A dWaiillg.lloUSe ; two re ceiving stolen goods ; one with futgery • two tittering counterfeit silver; two with manslaug hter; one with bigamy ; one with falsely pretending to be nest of kid to a deceased seaman; three with larceny : one of the prisoners, John May Lund, is charged with stealing six oxen, the property tif the Hon. George Wood, Kid. one of the Judges in the present Concuit. —The trial of the individuals charged with political, or rather with treasonable offences, riches particular interest, from the facts, true or false, which have been stated, in and out of Parliament, respecting Oliver, and the part he is alledged to have acted in the affair at Huddersfield. As the evidence will corm be before the Public, we abstain from all allu sion to the statements and anticipations of the provin cial journals, especially those of the neighbourhood. Let us hope that the undisguised truth will be elicited on the trials.—thieer, the spy, ii, it seems, a native of WAles, and by trade a carpenter. He was, a few years ago, a s?rjeant in the Whitechapel Voltinteers. ~ - We extract th - e following paragraph from the Nor: cvich Alercury :--.1 Last week A Gentleman WAS brought before the Sitting Magistrates of one of the norther divisions of the county of Suffolk, charged, on the oath of a young Lady of high,rank; niece to a liable Lord, that she was verily afraid that he would carry her away from her uncle's mansion against her will and the public peace, aad contrary to law ; he having followed her from Bath, where he h.d first met her at the public assembly, and became so deeply enamoured that he immediately introduced himself to her family, and on her returning to their seat, in Suffolk, he took up his quarters at an inn in the neighbourhood, from whence lie embraced every opportunity of obtruding himself on her nutice, and %lici t laid her under the necessity of making use of . the means above resorted to (miler own security. He described himself as Captain in the Royal Fusileers, a native of Ireland, aati nearly related to a Peer of that lingdom. He WAS required by the Magistrates to find bail for the next Quarter Sessions, himself in aloo and two sureties in re:3o each. Being so per fect a stranger in the neighbourhood this latter re qoisition would have occasioned some difficulty if it bad nut been immediately obviated by the Captain's produjog tao Bank bills of rtlso each, whic , speak ing a language universally understood, procurel his immediate enlargement." CORN EXCHANGE, MARK.LANE, JULY 91. Having had a very large arrival of Wheat since this day week, and the weather continuing favourable, caused exceedingly heavy sales this morning, and al though prime qualities Irons Essex obtained 2s. per quarter more titan on last Monday, yet all other de. scrip.ions were unsaleable, although offered on lower terms. Barley, Beans, and Oats are from ls. to 2s. per quarter higher than on last Monday, but salts were not so brisk as on friday. In has iuid other i uiticJes there is no alteration. 1..111" INTELLTGENCr. COURT OF CHANCERY, RILE 19. RANELAGH GARDENS. Sir S.w.tum. ROM ILLY moved, that a Receiver might be appointed to receive the profits of these G.i:denc Mr. Wr.ittitut. followed. Mr. 11. th r con,emed. The Lola) CIIANCLLLOIt...." I cannot help express my astonishment, that these fourteen Ems, of wr:ielt thew is irdens co , ,sist, should be so long un enclosed and uncultivated ; Int I dare say. Mr. HAT!, it they belonged to you or me, we would know how to ina:.;e them pay."—irlntion granted ilk LArig zuGair MON• WM. MI :IMAM. S:r Alt 1111 . 3 Pi(.tvicr moved for an order to con firtn the keport of the Master, to raise two sums of .E5OOO and /COOO by mortgage on the estates devis ed by the Lie reapectable and esteemed Right Hun. Wind Lain to hi' executors, for the purpose of liquidating his debta ; and that Mary and Deborah Viner, two intimate friends of the family, and parti. cul acquainted with I.lrs.Windhans, be permitted to psy I. O° into the 1340 k, in the nem: of the Ac eomptant-General. Mr. Palmer, ode of the earcittura, beim; willing to advance JC.I.OOU, thus making AVOW. to nay of the debts of the deceased. The L'IND CUANCILLUR.-.." I SiitiUld SOpperse, Sir Arthur, no opposition is made to this." B.r A liTtllat Ils'ketiorr--" None, any Lord." Motion granted. ACCOMPTANT-ORNIMALIS OFTICE. Sir AItTIIVR Pl/309TT enured. in the name of all tl.e suitors of the Court, that from and after the?.34,1 of August next. the books of the Accumptant-Ge neva be cl ,sed till the Seal before the next Michael mas Term; that during the interval nil money be paid in or wit of Court, and no order relating to lush money be, un any account, made by that Court; provided. however, that nr,tice of this order be af fixed in the sever& Offices and Cuumbouies connected with the Court. The LORD CIIANCRLLAR-4. Such a motion Is very proper."—Ont,r male accordingly. WU MARK WOOD The parties in this case had had several transac tions joint purchases of estates. They had pur chased an estate, FAIII Mai k, front Mr. Hicks Beach, Sir Mark Wood having advanced the money, and it having been agreed that the profits should, in the first place, be applied to the re-paymeilt of the pur chase-money, and should then be equally divided between them. They afterward; quarrelled, and eiC h brought his action at law. To aid these litiga tions each agreed to withdraw a juror, and to refer the matter ire dispute to arbitration : but not agreeing on an arbiter, they appointed two nominees, who chose Mr. Cox arbitrator. He awarded that the es tate should be sold, and that the muney advanced should be repaid to Sir blark Woo::. Sir Mail: Wood, in consequence, signed an order to blessrs. Hoggart and Phi llips to sell the estate, bnt Mr. Grif fith refused to concur. The plaintiff then filed this bill to compel the specific performance of the award. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY, Mr. LEACII, aed Mr. COOLS, , for the plaintiff, argued that the defendan. was bound by the award to concur in the sale of the estate. Some question as to the tit lc to the estate had been submit ted to the Deputy Remembrancer of the Exchequer, who never reported upon it. The award orJtred that application should be made to the Court of Ex chequer for the sale, and if the Court refused, which it did, then they should Authorize Messrs. Hoggart and Phillips, auctioneers, to sell their rights and in terests in the estate, and they might become bidders at th it sale. The Master of the Rolls had accord ingly decreed that the defendant should concur in the specific performance of the award. The defendant had appealed against this decree, and they therefore applied to his Lordship to enforce performance. Mr. HART, for the defendant, contended that the Master of the Rolls had taken but a cursory view of the award, or that the award contained a principle of great injustice; and that there was another objec tion, on the ground of the award implying the 0 1 - 1 fence at common law called mairsimance. If the rights end interests of the parties were to he set to sale, while a good title could not be made out, with al lowance to the parties to bid, it was :hen only an op tion in favour of the plaintiff, as he alone had money to advance. But the award distinctly expressed that, in either case of sale of the estate by order of the Exchequer, or of the interests of the parties by Hog gart And Phillips, if no title could be made out, then Mr. Cox knew not what to award. The blaster therefore never contemplated any sale without a title, and the defendant was justified in refusing Lis con currence, As the title was not yet made good. Me. GRIFFITH, for himself, argued that the Court had no jurisdiction, because a Rule at Nisi Prius bad been obtained in the King's Bench for contempt of the award, and he had been Acquitted : but the mein ground of objection was, that if the award were obeyed the offence of maintenance and charnperty would be committed. In proof of this he referred •to several statutes. Many disputes and litigations tvcre connected with this estate. The sale of it there fore, was maintenance, and Mr. Farquhar, who lately bought the estate, was guilty of that offence. Mr. Leach observed, in reply, that Mr. Griffith, not being acquainted with the practice in a Court of Equity (he is a Barrister in Bristol), had not known that the sale that took place on the Master's decree, or the articles of it, was not before his Lordship.— The only question was, whether the decree itself was eight ? His Lordship declined giving judgment, as he could not carry Ins mind through so complicated an aw..rd, without first going over it Attentively in his , do:et. LORD MAYOR'A COURT, GUILDHALL. THE NEW FOS I ' -OFFICE. TIIE CORP./RATION OF LONDJN V. MARY HOOD. Thi► was an inquiry to ascertain the amount of compensation due to the defendant, who was claimant in the case, for a compulsory removal, under the Act of Parliament for the erection of a New Post. Office, from a house Occupied by her in St. Martin's le•Grand, and which was situated on the scite of the intended erection. The COMMON SZAJEANT stated the case to the Jury on the part of the Corporation, and observed, that the sum of e2OO had been offered by that body to the clAimant as a fair remuneration for her loss and damages. 1-ic should prove that the suns tendald to the defendant was fully adequate to the ioss tained by I►er._ The sum claimed by the defendant was ar1,570, which he was confident the Jury would cnnsidrr most enormous, and totally wtde 01 that to which she was fairly entitled. Mr. Montague, the City Surveyor, proved the value of the premises, loss of trade. Ste. and ha con• sitlered that C2OO was it very liberal compt3hAtion fur the removal. Mr. Kaye, Surveyor to the Post•OA'iee, derma to the 'Arne effect. Mr. SerjeAnt COPLEY briefly addressed the Jury in suppert of the claim set up by the defendant, %%Lich he should prove was by no [maps So " enormous," and se wide of the mark," as the Learned Common Serjeant had wished to show. Mr. Bevan, a Surveyor, and several other petsons were then called tb prove the value of the premises ; the profits of the trade carried on by Mrs. Hood, which was that of a ceder, and the loss and incon venience sustained by the removal of that trade to another neighbourhood. The et.111141t4 &MEANT having commented upon tl►e evidence on both ►ides, left it to the Jury to give such damage as the justice of the case seemed to demand, The Jon , consulted a few m , lntents, and returned a verdict, awarding to the claimant the sum of el4o, tieing WAX) over and above the offer made by the City of London. • THE SAM% V. POWELL. The claimant in this case alto occupied a house in Round -court, St. Martin's-le-Grind, where 6•• rai ried on the bus;ness of a pAinttr and glazier. lie had been offered 4 4 200 by the Corporation. The sun' claimed by him was €l3o‘). Mr. Montague was again c tiled, and deposed to the value of the unexpired term of the lease held by the defendant, as also to the losses in trade, and otherwise, which he would suffer by the removal. lis his opinion the sum offered by the City WAS an ade quate remuneration. _ Mr. Bevan WAS then cAled by Mr. Serjeant Cot.- LIM 10f the defendant—He had valued the premises, and also made an estimation of the damage and loss of trade attendant on the removal of the defendant and ye WAS of opinion that 01300 was the compel', sation to which the latter was Lolly entitled for such A removal. To a question put to this witness (who is a member of the Society of Friends) by the ComatoN SEHJEANT, whether, independent of charges for the survey, he was not to receive a sum of money for his attendance at that Court ? He replied, g , Certainly, And it is but fair. I fancy none of you Gentlemen wouli come here without refreshen." This reply ex cited much mirth In the Court. Other witnesses were called to prove the receipts of the trade, Sac.—Th4 Jury returned A verdict—Da mages, 4550. OXFORD MIDSUMMER ASSIZES.-CIVII, r.IDF. BREACH OF PkOMBE OF MARIAIMA. HARMS ^J. LOADFIII. Mr. SIIENIKRD opened this cast, and stated, that it wax an action to recover compensation in dama g es for a breach of promise of marriage. Mr. Watery's:us addressed the Court and Jail n the part of the Plaintiff, whom be.represented to he a young lady of respectable connexions, and of consi derable persoaal beauty and accomplishments. The injury, lie observed. which she had sustained throtk.;ll the conduct of the Defendant, wai almost the ereatest which a man could intct upon a woman. The De fendant, who was a man of competent lorturp, be. came acquainted with the Plaintiff in the summer of 1815, a.id in a short time secured both her heart and affections. He was introduced to her tether, who was a farmer of some consequence, and was received by her family with reel y possible coolidence and friendship. His attentions to Miss Harris were of the most assiduous description, and to such a length had the mutual determination to be married gone,' that a day was actually !bad for the wedding, which WAS to take place on the same day on which Mr. John Harris. the brother of the Plaintiff, was to take the hand of a young lady to whom he had lung been pay ing his addresses. The welling dress was purchased, and the bride-maid chosen. In defiance of all these preliminaries, however, the Defendant, who was be tween 50 and fio years of age, abandoned his engage- Omni' ; and without the sligl test apparent cause de. setted the Plaintiff, and put it completely out of his power to make her amends, by mart.) ing A younger lady, a Miss Stone, only '2l years of age. The hopes of the Plaintiff were thus utterly 14 isted, and almost all chance of A settlement hie lila was frustrated. A woman placed in such A situatiiin had to encounter difficulties which were unknown to the opposite s-x. A man, it he were refused by a lady, had only to seek a new object of attention, and was successlisl ; but a woman, on the contrary, having been once known as •betrothed, could scarcely ever hope to meet a arcond offer. With respect to damages for such an inlay, it was impossible to name a sum which would he adequate to the mischief sustained : nevertheless, tl:e law allowed a cirtain proportion of compensation. and it would lac for the Jury on this occasion to award such a verdict as would at least shew that the disap pointment of the PI iintiff was not attritnit.ible to any fault of her own, but to the perfidy of one in whom her confidence had been misplaced. The Learned , Counsel then called evidence to support his case. Mr. Jelin Harris, brother to the Plaintiff, deposed. ! that he resided with his father, at East Hannan, in 1 this county. At the litter end tit the year, 815, 1 his sister because acquainted with the Detelidant, who WAS a Gentleman living en his property at West ! ' Hannan, a short distance from her father's house.— I ! He addressed witness's sister as ha suitor, and every I person anticipated an union between them. Watneas 1 asked the Defendant it he would be married on the same day on which he was about to be married him self, to which he agreed ; and in order to avoid some difficulties, witness consented to postpone his own wedding, to meet the convenience of the D..tientlasit. 1 The Defendant afterwards abandoned his promise, and witness was married on the 28th of December, I 1815. The Defendant. however, still continued his, assidoities to the Plaintiff, and paid her every pos-1 sible attentton. This continued till the month of April, 1816, when the Defendant married another lady. Cross-examined by Mr. Jituvis.—The Defendant first saw witness'i sister at Grove Feast ; he walked home with her to her father's house. Witness was not at home when they first came in, bnt came hotne soon after; he went to bed and felt thew together. TLia was the beginninz t,f thr enurtthip I it was the mnntli of Angust. F1. , 111 st JIM' till Apra the Defend int was nssidu•lns in his attentions to wit ne.s's sister. Witness p.stponed his own marriage in crd-r Ora :h. re rrigt.t be too marti fgeq at once i t the 1 N...ver Ito erd the D -fendant gar in terms-- , . I will marry yin- s;stre." At the login= fling tit Apil rilled upon wi•nets's si:aer. and made a preknt tee Thr all cupped to. pettier tl:at eta vtry liorpj : heard no di•agreeinelt betwe.n defendant an/ Ilis .:ster. W!len en- Dc.1.11.1.1.1t oke of rn t rryo i4 sister en (Le tnr day s wimess w . ss to Iv_• mattieet withe s s ;11;101h:el the stNret tirst. bI s; U. Ip.tals Harts, sister t‘• the Pll;litifY, col. firmed t'le nt the list nsituesa. :she never heard of and div , :t.t.:ta...en her sire' and dm De fendant. T:.ey seemed much attached to each other. occaa;on illy went to lo.d auJ left them sitting up to g s Etter. R c 41 , :cted last even• ing the Delendaist spent at licr father's han.r, 1 brought a present for kr father. He 1:.:(1 ask,.d witness to stand AC britk'd nai'd ; and the wedding- gnwn was pr: pared. Cross-examined by Mr. DAutinEv.—TLe prevent which the Defendant gave to si , ness's bather was some fish. It was dressed for supper ; vitald rot collect villa snrt of a fish it was; could not ray ther the Defendant WAS a fist fish or ar. ndsl She very oho' lel t her sister with the Defendant alooe. Was sure the Defendant was fl:1 years nt age ; not atiaiel to leave this vo!atile youth Alone ai,lt her sister; if Va were yettayer sl:e would have dene tLe same thing. Never heard the Del_ridant speak to her father About the matriage ; when he asked her to become bride's maid, she did not 14,80 at e poor old man's folly. lie al.vays, after 01., Erb' in. trnductihn, paid his visits on Wednesdays ..n.t Sun days. He lived very near, but did mit coma on other d iys. Her father and mother weir !reel:waif,' at home when the Defendant can't., and often went to bed, leaving her sister and him together. William Harris, the father of the plaintiff, also prayed the continued visms of tLe di..ftndant to his elau , t liter —4,e always cond..lered him as th e suitor of his ' daughter. When he s!iscontutued his visits at one time, witness caliei on !aim at lash, toe„cid slid that his da.ighter was very uneasy at his alai, use. The defendant said she should out make hetsoll un easy, he thought it was better ! - .e st, p away a little—hut she might depend that he wt,uld be goo d to his wood. cross-examination by Mr. JEttets, witness ad mitted that he had never actually said any thing to the defendant about marriage, net. did :he ele'ciai int say be would marry I.is daughter, hat had alway s conducted liimelf as if lie intended to marry her. 1-le never S4IV any iitipto;.er levity in his daughter, nor did he ev.r Lear toe defendant complain of her in any way. y Codd ird .puke as to the gewral ()pi. Ili( w4s tntert‘ined that the 41.A - id:lnt 44.1 Mks thtris wcrt• to he mirriell. Jni►n Htilme•, Elq, proved that the defendant livea itpnn hip krikitte, sad was cnnsiderea us a MAR of prve:t y. . . Mr. Jettvss now addressed the Jury at considera ble length, on the part of the defendant. He denied that, in this co.e, there had been any thing like a breach of promise at all; for although ttie whole fa• milt' of the plaintiff had been calk:: to prove her CAS!, not one of them had gone so far as to impute to the defendant an actual promis e to m a r r y. jr, wa s that the defendant might have occasion olly paid visits to the family of the phintiir, and there certainly seemed to be an malt:us disposittua on then. part to draw him into a matriage, for it was seen that every pains were taken to the young and giggling couple togedier ; and that even at night, when' a watchful patent would have Irk it his duty to watch ov r his daughter, the whole family were hound re. tiring to bed, in Lode: to give A stronger colour to their views; but still this was. in no repent bindirg on the defendant, 11 , 11 did it appear that lie had even thought of matrimony, until s &cited to awry on a particular day by the plaintiff's brother. There oat something, it WAS tollit, s aid ethritlt 8 bride's-maid and A wedding gown ; ha• surety a joke of this sort from an old man, capable of being the father of the plain tiff, could never.have been received in'a seiious light. Then again, t!•ere was A present of fish, but this, was to the plaintiff's tether, and WAS one of those com mon acts of courtesy which meant nothing beyond civility. If, tiposithe whol however, the Jury ilsould npinson,.that they really WAS any g r • n o d f ur this action, the nest qtrotion fear their cot.sideration would be, the amount at . damage which the plains i>y had sustained. Errnse, upon her part, there had evidently been none incurred, beyond tine putchase of a wedding gown; and, no duubt, this WAS C.i 4 very plain descript •sn, and had been manufactured by the plaintiff herself. llad there been dress-olaktas em ployed on the occasion, they would, in all probability, have been added to the catalogue of other witnesses. Upon this score, therefore, he apprehended the Jury would Agree with him in thinking that a few shillings would answer the justice of the caw : with regard to. any other loss of which the plaintiff had a sight to expect compensation, he really could see none; for to A yuung Lady ul V. 5, he should imagine to be rid set au old 511401* tit Siaty, was a I:l4tet fa:11121- et con. gratulation tLin of %111 and 1:C had 113 &LOA alAt Miss Hartis w:ta heartily ;7,1 tu be relti.v...l from his illiptirtUllitlCS. Mr. JUAICe Said, that this case it was tie the Jury to s.ty, v.hothcr, from Cie general conduct of the defendant, who was A ni.in AdValllCed in lite, and th.refine capable of judging of his actions, he hail nut given stitli,:ient inlication of his intention to marry the plaintiff, ca to warrant the belief that suet* WAS his desire? It oas very true, that lie had titver said in express terms to any ut the witnesses whn had been called, that he would marry Miss Harris; lint it appeared that when he was asked by Mr. Hark jun. whether he would marry his sister on the same day on which he was to be marritd himself, so far WAS he from denying Ctat Ito c nremplated a mil nage with Pit; ; ! -hiss that he actually alre-: , 1 to the suggestion, although he subsequently ay. bled the fulfilment of Its promise. It WAS AISO InallilealVl*-1 his language to tlle father of the plaintiff, when he waited upon him to I.:illt.sent the painful fealtogs which his absence Itai occasion.:d iit the mind c.t h s daughter, that at that time he fully underaand the tooting upon which :Ir was considered.. I ► words he said, he tnutight it WA+ betas clot bc. should scup