Star. — London, England, 1822-11-05 00:00:00

,ICE-CHANCELLOR'S COVRDI NOY. 4. PRACTICE OF THE COURT WITH AWIFECT TO IN- JUNCTIONS. COURT AND CO. V. MOUNT.IOY AND CO. Mr. HAnT moved for an injunction against the defendants under the following circumstances ; —His Majesty is seized in right of the Crown, of the Forest of Dean; in Gloucestershire, which contains much iron and coal. Any perton who may be desirous of working a mine in the forest must make application to the King's Steward of the Forest, who, if he think • fit, will grant the person so applying a track of land for that purpose. In 1800 the plaintiffs obtained. the grant of a piece of ground, and the defendants also were put into possession or some contiguous land. The respective boundaries of each track of land were accurately defined. The plaintiffs lately had reason to suspect that the defendants were encroaching upon their boundaries; and on the 20th of August they had the ground dialled, when it appeared that the defendants had entered the boundaries of the plain tiffs, and were about to sink a pit there in order to - discharge the water out of their own mine into that of their neighbours, the effect of which would be the complete destruction of the works. The injunction he . applied for was to restrain the defendants from , pfbeeecfing with the construction of the pit. TIM VICE-CHANCELLOR observed, that the Court leas eheeys unwilling to issue an injunction on an ex piate application, unless the absolute necessity of the rototeeding were evident. In the present case there ctirtairtlY was priroirfacie evidence of necessity, but at the same time, if the Learned Counsel had reason to belieTe that no irreparable mischief would ensue from the delay necessary in order to give the defend ants notice, -the Court would not grant the injunc tion, but let the case stand over. The Lord Chan cellor had lately established a custom which was un known to his predecessors—namely, that of directing an injunction to stand over until the defendant re ceived notice of the motion. This practice he (the Vice• Chancellor) was desirous of following, because, be knew that frequently the desire to prevent irre parable mischief being - done to a plaintiff, caused irreparable mischief to be inflicted upon a defendant., The Court, therefore, in future would expect, that on in application for an injunction, it should appear upon affidavit either that there had not-been time, or that it would have been dangerous to give the defend. ant notice, otherwise the motion would be refused. Mr. HART said he was informed by his clients that the most unfortunate aesults would ensue to them if the injunction did not immediately issue. The VICE-CHANCELLOR said, that under these el:. cutnstances, and because the rule laid down by the Lord Chancellor was not generally known, he would grant the injunction in the present instance. PAPENY V. NICHOLS, BUTTERWORTH, AND OTHERS. Mr. WILSON, on the part of.the plaintiff, applied for an injunction to restrain the defendants, Messrs. Nichols, Henry Butterworth, and Simpkin and Mar shall, from publishing and selling a work entitled a 44 Treatise on the Practice of the Court for the Relief of Insolvent Debtors." The facts of the case, as stated by the Learned Gentleman, were as follows:—In the year 1821, the drfendant, Mr. Nichols, an Attorney, wrote the work in question, which the pillintiff, who is a bookseller i t Temple.lane, undertook to publish at Iris own cost. The number of the first edition was 500 ; all of which (with the exception of 18 copies, which went to Mr. Nichols) were to be sold for the benefit of the plain tiff. The copyright of the work was vested in Mr; Nichols, but it was stipulated that he should not pub lish a second edition, until the whole of the first had been sold. The plaintiff charged, that on the 31st of October last Mr. Nichols, in violation of his agree ment, gave to Messrs. Butterworth, of Fleet -street, and Simpkin and Marshall, who published it, a work, the same in title, and essentially the same in substance, as that published by the plaintiff, who had not yet disposed of his first edition. The plaintiff supported his statement by affidavits.—lnjunction granted. COURT OP COMMON PLEAS, NOVEMBER 4. , . I The bankrupt, in UV, Ikea ti.liteettpop a wine-merchant, aid-100i . iteetteditiftekrties ( 111 three or four thogafitd.Po944 6 .Wpith. stock it his cellar, although be ' had not paid a ing- in the pound under his rot-user aommissiori. e should call-, witnesses who would proie that at •thettitne of these. .supposed advances, Steer' was a man in r distressed circumstances ; he should tikob - prnve the execution of a warrant of attorney for £550 to On Wija44, w i l l% acted as attorney for the plaiutif and the bankrup‘, Mr. Williams and the plaintiff being alto`aßerwards the securities of the bankrupt whilst he Was in the custody of the. Marshal of the Kinei Smith prison. From these circumstances of suspicretlite thought the Jury would be warranted in giiing a verdict for his client. He then called Mr. Jones, Marshal .of the • King's bench prison, who proved the execution of the swedes given for the bankrupt's obtaining the Rules. Henry Mortimer, clerk to Mr. Williams ' the At torney. swore that Holding was indebted to Williams more than 1.300, but he was not certain that bills had been delivered at the time the- warrant of attor ney was executed. Some witnesses were then called who had dealings in trade with the plaintiff, and they proved that the plaintiff had nat been so regular in his payments. during the years 18211 and 1821, as he was preceding that period. After the evidence for the defendant had been gone through, Mr. Serjeant PELL replied. The Loan Ciller JusTlce in summing up the Zvi- dente observed, that unless the Jury disbelieved the testimony of Thomas Holding and Lerigo, there ap peared a sufficient petitioning creditor's debt of cash lent, independent of the bills. The Jury. would not lightly impute fraud or perjury, and without the sup. position of fraud or perjury throughout the transaction, the plaintiff was certainly entitled to their verdict. The Jury, after a short consideration, returned a verdict for the plaintiff. STEERS V. TIF.ATIIFIELD. This was an issue di--.3..ed by the Vica-CHaticat.- Lon, to try the validity of a commission of bankrupt issued against William Holding, in which the plain tiff was petitioqing creditor, and the question to be tried was, whether, at the time of issuing such com mission, in January, 1821, there was a good petition ing creditor's debt ? Mr. Serjeant YELL stated the case for the plaintiff, and called the following Witnesses : Thomas Holding, brother to the bankrupt, being examined, stated, that he was a creditor under his brother's commission s but had released him. The plaintiff is a mealman and baker ; witness's father and Steers's father had connexions together in busi ness; witness lived with his brother, as clerk, in Au gust, 1820; remembers being sent to Mr. Steers in August, and receiving £5O, which Mr. Steers lent his brother. The same year he borrowed 13.5, and gave an I: 0. U. for it. His brother had a cellarman, named David Lerigo, who went to the plaintiff for money, and gave to the witness as much as £4O: The plaintiff accepted for witness's brother the bill for £137 now produced, and also the bill for £93. 15s. Cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant went to live with his brother in 1818. An illegal commission was issued against him, but was super seded, and then this commission was issued. Witness was examined before the Commissioners, and com-i mitred, but has brought actions, and expects to re cover considerable damages. David Lerigo, examined.—Witness was eeilarman to Holding, and had twice been sent to Mr. Steers for money by his roaster. The first was for £3O or £35, and the second he received £4O. Cross-examined by Mr.WILDE.---Witness does-not know of any property belonging , to Holding, the bankrupt, being conveyed to Steers in 1820. The bill drawn by Holding, and accepted isy the plaintiff, for £IS7, Was then produced, and proved to have been paid by the plaintiff. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN addressed the Jury for the i defendant, and centended, that this was a species of case which required the most vigilant attention from, the Jury .the real question was, whether this was - . r, to which Holding, the the plaintiff, were parties, -• the kilitfidtt creditors ? • we awry .usc mita witscaa... , .. not. fraudulent commission - , bankrupt, his brother, and tin for the purpose of defrauding • 1, • ARCHES COURT, NOVEMBER 4. This being the first day of the Civil Law Term, the Dean of Arches heard prayers in the dining-room of the Common Hall, the JUDGE himself and the Ad vocates being in their full scarlet robes, according to the form annually observed on these occasions. Dr. J. T. PICA RDE, Fellow of New College, Ox ford, was introduced into Court, between his Ma jesty's Advocate (Sir CHRtSTOPUIR RoximoN) and 'Dr. ARNOLD, and having been by tbeni presented to the Junoe, the latter admitted him, in obedience to the rescript of the Archbishop of CANTERBURY, as an Advocate in his Grace's Court of Arches. PERRIN V. PERRIN. This was a suit of divorce by reason of adultery, promoted by Mr. W. Perrin against his wife. Dr. DODSON stated, that he should not detain the Court by folloMug at any length his Learned Friend Dr. Lushingtt.n, who had addressed the Court in this caase, and with whom he was associated ; but he would beg to urge upon the Court the very clear evi dence which had been given by Stanborough, the servant. This young woman was a servant with-Mrs. Statham during all the period in which it was charged that Mr. Hull slept with Mrs. Perrin in her apart ment. Now Stanborough deposed that the fact could not have been so without her knowing it ; whereas she never saw Mr. Hull at such an hour, or in such a situation, in Mr. Statham's house, as to afford the slightest ground for suspecting any improper con nection or intercourse between him and Mrs. Perrin. The same witness had effectually disproved the state ments which would be found in Statham's evidence, namely, that he was in the habit of letting Mr. Hull into the house at night, and letting him out in the morning, after the servants had gone to deep and be fore they were awake. Stanborough positively swore to her belief that no one could have been so admitted or let out without her hearing it. She never did hear anything of the kind. Much stress had been at tempted to be pit on the circumstance of there having been found upon the pillow of Mrs. Perrin's bed, a shirt, which the other side had failed in shewing, as they had endeavoured to shew, to be the property of Mr. Hull. On- the contrary, it was clearly in evi dence that this very shirt was one which had belonged to the Lady's husband, Mr. Perrin, and had been worn by him the day before their separation, in 1821. It was proved by her mother, Mrs. Hislop, that she al ways slept with this shirt under her pillow, fancying that it had a charm to protect her. Dr. Jenner, how ever, on a former day, had chosen to remark on this account as the most absurd and most improbable that could be imagined. But though (Dr. Dodson conti nued) his Learned Friend might smile at such fancies, the Lady might have had great faith in them ; for N Some secret truths, from learned pride conceal'd, To dames' alone and children are reward. What though no credit doubting Doctors give?— The fair and innocent may still believe!" It did not follow, therefore, because Dr. Jenner might be somewhat sceptical on such a subject, that Mrs. - Perrin should have a single doubt in respect of the efficacy of a charm which she so decidedly consi dered to be inherent in her husband's shirt, as to scold Mrs. Hislop very severely for having one day unwit tingly waited it, and thereby dissipated its latent vir tue. In conclusion, the Learned Counsel submitted, with Dr. Lushington, that Mrs. Perrin ought to be dismissed from all further observance of this suit. Dr. JENNER and Dr. J. ADAMS were heard in reply. SirJoHN Ntetsou, said he would take time to con sider his sentence. GILL V. OILL. This case has also been more than once before our Readers. The Proctor of Mr. Gill stated, that.. the .Court having assigned his client to take his wife home again, and to treat her with due kindness and affection, he now attended to certify the same before the Court in the usual way. The Proctor for the wife submitted that no step of this sort could be taken until Mr. Gill should have first been absolved from the contempt which the Court bad pronounced him to be in, by reason of his not having complied with the Court's former injunction. The Proctor for Mr. Gill observed, that that injunc tion was for the payment of costs; -and those having now been paid, which it was the object of the con tempt to compel, his client Was surely in a condition to certify, as prayed. Sir Joust blscuot.t. said he could non , beer , the point ergo - eel in this manner; but :be ° Counsel ea it, if the parties chose: ALSTON V. D 1 Gam. • • a ' Dr. Losatimoros observed, that for the alotiost • for 7ehttitli. ° ..t hid iiilll:Ciatri cof tietat (Arches) Court had heard and given sentence in the matter, the costs were taxed at the sum 0f209.1. Bs. 511. as against Mr. Dagger. fiayment was resisted: a significant was issued, the party was taken up for con tempt, and, under the authority of this Court, com .Mitted to prison. The proceedings which had sub-' - sequently been had elsewhere, the Court *would find derailed in • 5 I:Wittman, and 'Alder*, p. 794.: It 'appeared in that report, that a motion was made to .chew cause why Mr.'Dugger. should not be released, and that that indiViditill was accordingly brought up by . Habeas Corpus, on the ground that the original cause was wrongly set forth and deserjbed in thesig nant, in virtue of which the commitment had been made. This objection was held to avail; and by th • Count of King's Bench, accordingly, the sigNiftarvio was' quashed. Mr. Dogger was released immedi. ately;. but the taxed costs being still unpaid his (Dr.' Lushington's) present 'notion was for a monition against that person, to compel payment of them. It seemed. to him, that a step which this Court had a right to en. force could now be so enforced only by such monition.. Sir JOHN NICHOLL saw two distinct grounds upon which he could not giant this new monition; the first, that it was described as an application in the matter of Alston and_Dugger. But was there any such cause depending now in this Court? The Registrar replied in the negative. It had ceased to stand out ever since 1819. The last proceeding was this—the contempt was signified. Sir JOHN NICHOLL—I find then, in the very outset of this business, that the Court is fhndus qfficio—it has no such cause before it. Dr. Lusfituorox apprehended that it would be a very ink!' ions doctrine to lay down that the Court was, in this instance, functus (thruio. By the Act of Parliament which gave the Court the power of im prisoning for contempt, it was expressly provided that no release should take place but on an order of the' Judge, under the Registrar's signature, purging a party of his contempt, and certifying his payment of costs. If, in the present case, the Court was functus ?Sao, in another, a party once committed for con tempt might remain in custody for ever; for a Court that was functus qfficio could make no such order. Sir Jonn Ntelsott, said, that the next reason for his not granting a fresh monition was, that the ap plication rested merely on the Learned Counsel's own statement—correct as no doubt that statement was : but it was not supported by a single affidavit. His own impression however was strong, that the Court was here functus officio. ' Dr. Lustintarorr suggested that the Court, by reason of the very wording of the Act, could not be so; and.begged to observe on the peculiar hardship of his client's case, if the Court should ultimately refuse its monition. This was not a Court of Record, and he therefore could have no action at law for his debt, but must lose his £2OO. The COURT said it would hear the matter, if the Learned Counsel wished to bring it forward in a more regular manner. Quest-SQumit.—Yesterday, Sarah Shipley, a genteel-looking young woman,was brought before Sir RICILAZD Iltasrue charged with creating a riot before the house of his Royal Highness the Duke of York, St. James's. Before the Magistrate she insisted that the King and the Duke of York wished to see her, but the servants refused her admission. The Magistrate, after various interrogatories, finding her to be a lunatic; told her, that if those great Personages wished to see her, they would write to her, and on shelving the letter to the servants she would gain admit: tante; and having learned from her the residence of her brother, he persuaded her to retire to the Officers' room, and directed them to send information to him. _ _ J. Raines, a Chelsea out-pensioner, was fully committed for stealing a pair of trowsers, a shirt, and a razor, tire property of a fellow pensioner; as was J. Kelly, a dealer in marine stores, for receiving the two latter articles, knowing them to be stolen. Ilannx-Gertoint.—J. Franks, who was charged with tutting and maiming J. Reynolds, as stated in the STAB. yesterday, was re-examined; when It appeared by the testimony of the com plainant's.brother, and a young woman who lodged in his house, notwithstanding the evidence on the first examination, that he was the aggressor ; that they had a regular fight, previous to which he struck the prisoner several times, who - wished to avoid the contention ; and a Surgeon pronounced complainant's injuries not to be dangerous. The Magistrate however said, the pri soner had evinced so much ferocity, that he should order him to give twenty-four hours' notice of bail. Lasszatn-STREET.—A ruffianly fellow, named lriaiant Clark, was brought up, charged with indecently exposing his person to some females. The prisoner has been several times in custody, and punished for offences of this description, and was yesterday sent to the House of Correction for three months. .. Samuel Eimer was *aged with brutally ill-treating a horse, and was ordered to pay a fine of £5; in default ef which he was sentenced to two months imprisonment. Umox-Hatt.—Yesterday, a foreigner, named Edward Harris, was charged with stealing a ring off the finger of Mary Anne Spencer.—The complainant stated, that she was returning home to her apartments, in Francis -street, Westminster-road, on Sun day night, about eleven o'clock, when the prisoner came tp to her In the road between the Obelisk and the Marsh-gate, and said, " My dear, I hope you will let me go home with you."— The witness refused, and be then took her by the hand, and in a moment slipped a ring off her little finger. She accused him of the theft, but he denied it. On his being threatened with having " watch" called, he took to his heels, but was soon over taken by the watchmen. The ring was not found on him. He was committed for trial. • DARING ROBBERIES IN BEUFORICSIIIRE.—YeSter.- dAy information was received at Marlborough-street Office, by Mr. Plank, the chief officer, of a most desperate gang of burglars, who have been most suc cessful in their depredations at Wootton, Deadman's Cross, Woburn-toad, Dunstable, Hanchliff, and other villages distant from London, on the Bedford 'Road. The gang consisted of several penults, who travelled in a taxed cart, and generally managed to be near a village by night; they always came into the place separately, and met, as it were, by accident. They acted under the direction of a tnulauo. Within a short period, the inforniation stated, they had plun4 dere.' several houses and stables, and in one night, robbed-the houses of Mr. Smith and Mr. Davis, and also attacked and plundered the dwelling of Mr. Beard, but the family being disturbed, the robbers were attacked while committing the burglary by the servants, and the mulatto.was shot, and'another was also wounded by a blow of la crow bar, and one, named 'Linsley, was secured, and lodged iu...Bedriird Jail. The mulatto and the other wounded man were assisted off, and although pursued oust ;Lacked by marks of blood for a considerable distance, .yet they , . them. was Out gettiiig clear off, it is supposed,. to London. Ram litratn,y circumstances, they are suspected to be the per. *mentors of some very cruel pets, and also of beiwg ,concerned in innumerable burglaries and robberies. .sled sheep and horse stealing.- .Ebe petty who Ed. ve the information is a respectable Gentleman of rd, and inquiries were directed to be made. Sunday se'nnight, two young men, and a blooming female, residing nor 50 miles from Think, took places in the Edinburgh Mail, to Newcastle, from Newcas tle to Carlisle, and from Carlisle to Gretna-Green, where they arrived about five o'clock in the evening of Monday ; and where one of the young men and the fair charmer, after the usual ceremony, joined with the bracksmith in a hearty laugh at the lolly of that . British legislation which, as connected with the Mar riage Mt; is daily violating the rules of morality. BIRTHS• In Dublin, the Lady of the Rev % Arthur Hyde, of a daughter. Lady Elisabeth Dawson, of a daughter. Oct. 26, the Lady of Colonel Master, of Winstead, Helder nets, of a daughter. Oct. Se. at Hanby, the Lady of the lion. Miles Stapleton, of a daughter. Oct. 27, in Harcourt-street, Dublin, the Baroness Robeck, of a son - ,3 and heir. Oct. 49, at the Rectory, liwillington, the Lady of the Re'r. T. Woodcock, of a son and heir. 1% . 1.A It It LED. Oct. 24, in Dunmanway Chu' ch, Lieut. Lorimer, of the lett 10th Veteran Battalion, to Amelia, only daughter of Frantis Harris, U.D. of Dunmanway. Oct. 24, at Hampsthwaite Church, the Rev. Theodore Drury, Rector of Keighley, to Anne, eldest daughter of John Greenwood, Esq. of Knowle, near Keighley. Oct. 22, at Lianddewy Aberarth, John Howell Thomas,Eso, surgeon, of Lampeter, to Frances Sarah, only *laughter of the late Captain Street, Ist Dragoon Guards. PRICES OF GOL' Foreign Gold in Bars New Doubloons ...... , New Dollars Silver, in bars, standard . ' MAILS. •an. nu a. Mb% 1 0 Waterford it 0 Guernsey and Jersey 1 0 Lisbon 0 0 Holland 0 1 Leeward lslands 0 0 1 WIGH-WATSHAL 51(nting . ' - • - ' Atternmir HOPS. .6 . . , . . . •.- - • • . • . - • . r; lis pel had-So anglit-k ne s.liiefultiter a lit bid not been Succeeded in ulikreihtt bauptruclolmoi l ia s; but *. fortunate as to Sid site sufficiently in point on a subsequent ly search being made; they were saes no sipscuodeit.pssiblioigsibuit preeeding, err • Maschliff..sud,,Deadmaies cases—••d • weir'lidtin llietereet . torkiiieraoen . ng. scarcely able - to proceed, Ms beAdf• isee fr and stbitli be Sail be +' able, u giiit i ttkitta sukiret iii Ole back being bound up, where helied reseived"tint it abtenty or aistiieritY. was saltine* a sun 'in ilot t - and - the other wounded *obi* ***Coo lab Our. which : the •offici la/ th e:' 4* had - been „ I wamoto,' inguedetgreat igen, and was oet aids to put aft-Lis agiiinst a pait•y, 4 , *lndecently brawiletanilthic(Tg c oat. They accounted for their appearance by saying ill 7 clutiCle Ithid 44411 appealed' :Outil tbeViiimis- they had been fighting a pride-Unit, The tartttiwy Jorial . Cebri q(Eietet: and ittet the:Judge of this brought with them-.was wised, but They soiceedtd is in ED. On Saturday evening last, the 2d instant, in the 18th year of her age, Sarah, youngest daughter of John Cape!, Esq. Russell. square. Thursday, at Bath, Admiral Peter Puget, in his 60th year, late Naval Commissioner at Madras and Trincomalee. Oct. 31, at Remington, aged 18, Richard Maidman Budden, eldest son of Major Budden, of the East India Company's service. April 22, at Trincomalee, after a short illness of fever, caught in the zealous discharge of his duty hi the Royal Naval Hospi tal there, Wm. Boyd, M.D. Oct. 31, at hie seat, Longton Hall, Staffordshire, Sir John Edensur Heathcote, Knt. lie enjoyed his usual health until after breakfast, when he was seized with apoplexy, and survived only a few hours. NENVGATE ism LEA DENII ALL 3I A ILK ETS. Nov. 4. (By the Carcase.) Beef is id to 2s 6,11 Veal ls 3d to 3s 41 mutton►. ls 3d to 2s 4d Pork ls 8d to 3s 01 Lamb 2s Od to Os 3d PRICES or HAY AND STRAW YRSTERDA Y. ST. JAIINS ' S. thy 31 4s Od to 41 Os od Thy... 31 Ss to 41 6s Od Straw 11 7s Od to 21 2s Od.l Straw 11 10s to 11 164 Od Clover 41 Os Od to 4110 s Od l Clover 31 103 to 41 10s od PRICE 0 NM BAGS. ISVV rocKETS. Kent Sussex 2l Os to 21 10* Sussex Essex Foreign ... 01 Os to 01 Os Farnham 6l Os to 71 is PRICE OF LEATHER. • Butts, SO to 561bs each Ditto, 56 to 661bs each 24d to 25d Dressing Hides lBd to 19i Fine Coach Hides 194 to 21d. • Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for cutting-- 194 to 20d Ditto 45 to 50Ibs 0 04 to 22i . Calf Skins, 30 to 401bs 22d to 27d Ditto 50 to 701bs 26d to 324 Ditto 70 to 801bs ... . 2Sd to 27d Small Seals (Greenland) • 18d to sod Large ditto ' 17d to l9tt Tanned Horse hides l6d to 18e Spanish Horse Hides... ........... ........ 13d to 87 RAW HIDES. • Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary— 2s 8d to 2s 10d stone) 3s 4d to 3,-, Od Market Calf 10s Od to Os Od Aliddlings 3s Od to 3s 2d Eng. Horse Os Od to Os 01 PRICE o► TALLOW, SOAP, &e. per 1121 b. Town Tallow 47s Od l'litto rough ........ ..... .. 255 Yellow Russia ... 4Bs od Yellow Soap ...... ........ 785 White ditto , ... Os Od Mottled ... Soap ditto Melting Stuff... ...... .. 37. Otl Palm PRICE OF CANDLES—From Tallow Chandlers' Hall. Candles, per doz. 9s Od—Moulds, lOs 8d; Bd. per dozen allowed for ready money. COAL-MARKET, NOVEMBER 4. Burdon 42s 6d—Dean's Primrose 42.5 661—liebburn Main 44s 3d—Killingworth 43s 9d—Wallsend Bell and Co.'s 4466 d Wallsend Bewiele 45s 6d—Wallsend Brown's 426 3d—Walls end Green 41s. 6d—Wallsend Northumerland 43s to 43, 3d Wallsend Ellison 43. 9d—Wallsend Riddell's 44s 941—W.411seml Russell 46s—Wallsend Walker 43s 6d—Old Walker 40$ 6d to 4011.9d—Barrington 403--Derbyshire 40s—Eden Main 42s 6d Lambton Primrose 42a 6d—Stobart's Primrose 39s ad—Walbr. eud Lambton 74s—Wallsend Springwell 42s—Wallsend Sto ban 42. 6d. 44 Ships at Market; 40 Ships sold; 6i Unsold. CHANG E. COURSE OF Amsterdam l2 2 C.F. Ditto at sight 11 19 Rotterdam... l2 3 2U. Antwerp, ez-mo 12 5 Hamburgh... 37 8 2U. Alcune 37 9 IU. Paris,3day'ssight 25 50 U. Ditto "5 80 2U. Madrid, effective 37 Cadiz effect $6l Barcelona . .... . 36 Baca, effective 361 LQ IN;lrsiutetrdittei publuhvoi by 1. place, Temple-il.kr. Seville l6 Gibraltar 301 Leghorn Genoa 431 Venice Ital. Liv 27 50 Malta Naples s9l Palermo --milli liet 0. Lisbon 541 Tito Janeiro 46 Dublin 9/ .D AND SILVER. 3 17 6 3 14 0 4 91 0 0 0 France Liatnburgis Flanders Iss' GQttenbnrsii Iltrakit •I&. aus. 1. 0 ci 1 o • 0 O 1 1 0 1 . 3 451P ( i5 1 0-111/1i UtiN. .r.inutot . for 7 aftrr k:iL 1,41, 1 4 _,, _...-