Star. — London, England, 1810-08-09 00:00:00

LAW JAVIELLIGENCE. • COURT OF KING'S BENCH, AUGUST 4. • SCHOLEY V. RAMSBOTTOM. This was an action for money had and received.for the plaintiff's use. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated, that the plaintiff, who was a respectable bookseller, hiving money in the bank of Ramsbottom and Co. wanting to draw a certain sum. on the 20th of September, 1809, wrote a check on the banker ; but having changed his mind as to the amount which he was about to draw, the plaintiff tore the check, and threw it under his feet. This check, which was torn in four parts, and dirty by being trampled on, was picked up by a person who afterwards gave in his name as Cummin. The muti lated check was pasted together, with a piece of strong paper at the back, and in that state was car ried by Cummin ta the defendant's house, on the 24th of the month. The clerk at the counter received the check, paid it without hesitation, and of course placed the amount, 066, to the plaintiff's debt. The plain tiff resisted this application, and the action arose in consequence. The plaintiff conceived that a check ► om ng tinder such circumstances to his banker should no• have been paid without enquiry ; and it was with the Jury to decide whether the • appearance of the trampled and tern check ought not to have excited an enquiry, "teach must have immediately detected the fraudulent pottession. Kinedon, the clerk, who had received the check, was tzamined. He had observed nothing on it that ought to have excited suspicion ; it was not torn roughly, nor was it dirty. The edges cif the divisions, were so neatly joined, that the junction might have escaped any eye. Checks were frequently brought torn and divided; there was no hesitation about pay ing them. He could not ascertain the person to whom the check was paid. On his cross-examination, be admitted, that he could not charge his memory with any of the particular ap pearances of the paper, but his expressions as to its cleanness and neatness of joining arose merely from his perfect feeling that it must have been very like other checks to have passed his eye, and that he could never have paid any paper which came before him in the state of that one which was now in Court. Other clerks were called to prove that the paper might have passed without suspicion, but they had no perfect recollection of the paper in question. The ATTORNIY-GENERAL in his reply, disclaimed all idea of fastening any blame on the evidence of ICngdon ; but it was quite clear that his evidence must go for nothing, from his imperfect memory of the transaction, and his being interested in proving the payment to be justified, as be was the clerk by whose carelessness the money was given to Cummin. Lord ELLENBOROUGH went with much minuteness into the circumstances of the case. A note might be divided in four ways, either by wearing in the folds, or by cutting to send by post, or by accident, or for cancelling. This paper was not cut in two, nor worn in the folds. If then it had been torn for cancelling, •it was clear that the banker ought not to have paid it ; but if torn by accident, that was sufficient to have excited suspicion at the banker's, and the clerk should lave enquired how the paper came into the hands of the person who brought it to his counter ? When a Man placed spOney in his banker's haads,he had a right to conceive it in a place. of security. He had a clear right to expect proper caution in the banker in paying it away—full as much caution as was, under ordinary circumstances, necessary to secure the money. In the present case there was a want of the cantion which ought to have been excited, and by that want, the money was paid away to aman who had fraudulently obtained possession of the check. The Jury retired from the box, and after a consi derable consultation, brought in a verdict 'for the Plaintiff.—Damages £366. AUGUST 6.— WILLIAM V. BARLOW. This' was an action on a policy of insurance at and from Surinam to London, =he ship Mentor. The ques tion in the cause was, whether the ship, at the time ofl insurance, was sea-worthy or not? There was a great deal of evidence both ways, and the cause lasted nearly the whole day • at length the Jury found for the plain tiff, namely, that the ship was sea-worthy. ROUTH V. THOMPSON. This was an action to recover the loss on a ship and cargo, insured from Lisboa to England. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL stated, that immediately before the breaking out of the Danish war, an order had been issued tostop all Danish ships. The Duchess of Bedford hired armed vessel, in the transport service, met the ship in question, and carried her into Lisbon in consequence of the order. 'When there, the Captain of the Duchess of Bedford, thinking it a pity so good a ship should be idle, as the Portuguese and English at that time at Lisbon, were wanting vessels to em bark their property, freighted her, and directed her to •be insured for £3OOO. The ship and cargo were lost on the voyage, and the insurers refused to pay ; chiefly on the ground that, as the ship was not the property of the Duclie.;s of Bedford's people, they had no insu rable interest in her, and could not insure in their own name. An action bad been already brought, and de feated on this ground, but the King, who had an in surable interest in all property so captured, had now, by the advice of his Counsel, ad.)pted the insurance for his Royal benefit, and the action was renewed on this change of circumstaptres. Mr. PAnKE, .for the defendant, proposed to have entire question put into a case foe argument ; prin cipally arguing upon the power of the Crown to adopt the insurance —The Jury would of course find a ver dict for the plaintiff, subject to •the opinion of the Court, on the point of law, and of an arbitrator as to the loss upon the freight. COWII V. SHERWOOD. This action was brought to recover damages for a breach of contract. The defendant had enteard into, a written agreement to purchase a cargo of Swedish cicals,landing from on board the Hunter, at the Sur rey Canal. The buyer was to object to any of the. timber which might be damaged, subject , to the final settlement of the brokers employed on the occasion.' Sixteen hundred of the deals were immediately deli vered, and bills to the amount of 01000 were given by the defendant. After that delivery, however, de fendant had never made any application for the re-. 1 mainder of the cargo, although repeatedly informed that it was-ready, it he chose to send for it, tendering, of course, goat bills for the womb Some diraatis4 \ • / het ;Olt appeared to exist on The port of the defenaadt ArGUST 1 7.-- , DELL 4. SLIM • as to the quality of the deals; but as he had not, ac- 1 This was an action of troves, brought by the as cording to the words of the contract,referred it to the signees of a bankrupt named Friend Andrews, who brokers to decide, the Jury gave a -verdict for plain- formerly kept the Royal Oak public house, at Brigh tiff ;an allowance to be made for such of the deals as ton, to recover back a certain valuable deed, said to were damaged, which is to be ascertained by the bro- have been improperly, obtained by the defendant. kers, their estimate being subject to the revision of a , It appeared from the evidence, that the bankrupt, third person. . 1 previous to his leaving his residence, and previous to A COMPOSITION SOLD 7011 PORT WINE. I his being made a bankrupt, conveyed to the defen- COWJE I , • DAY. dant, in consideration of £BOO, his furniture, stock in , This also was an action for breach of contract, and trade, and lease of his house ; and that he had ap was brought to recover the amount of the loss sus plied £4.00 of this sum to discharging all the debts mined by the defendant's not having fulfilled his coo. owing by him at Brighton. It also appeared, that he 'tract with the plaintiff; the defendant having con- did nit leave Brighton in consequence of any embar tracted to sell 13 pipes of port wine, while the wine rassmertt of circumstances, but in consequence of a 'delivered was not port wine, but of a very inferior , quarrel between him and one of his neighbours ; and quality. ! although he quitted his house immediately after exe- The Arrortxre-Gesattax. stated the contract.— cuting the conveyance, his intention of disposing of Among other articles, he contracted to sell to the plain- his stock in trade was known to several persons some tiff 13 pipes of port wine, at £37 per pipe, the plain- days previous to the deed being executed. Sume tiff paying the duties. The wine was not port w i ne, ' Itime after, however, the plaintiff in the present ac. 'nor did it taste like it, but was a composition called tion, a liquor merchant, to whom Andrews owed Guernsey red wine, which was not worth more something more than £lOO, sued out a Commission 'than W2B per pipe. He should prove that the of Bankruptcy against him, and now: sought to recr. clefendant knew, when it was sold to the plaintiff as vei back the deed of conveyance given to Slce, of the port wine, that it was nothing more than Guern- stock in trade, and lease of the house, upon the .sey red wine, he (the defendant) having bonght it as g rounds of its having been fraudulently executed by such. The wine delivered was a composition of Andrews, with intention to defraud the rest of his every thing In the world that was of a bad quality : creditors. and of a red hue ! He could more easily tell what : A question arose, in the course of the cause, as to the composition was not, that what it was. It was not the liability of Andrews to be made a bankrupt : port wine, nor was it in any way like it either in - P taste or quality.contract was then read, which called the 13 , üblicans merely selling beer or liquors to be con sumed in their house, not being considered as dealers The I pipes of wine port wine. udder the Bankrupt 1 aws. It appeared that Andrews was in the habit, as is Mr. Harboine, a broker, deposed thathe sold a quan tity of the-same sort of wine for the defendant, to a 1 usual with pu blicans , of sending out porter to be con- Mr. Durnsey, as port wine, which, on receiving, he • sume d b y his customers in their own hotices ; and immediately returned, finding it to be nothing more i that once he furn ished two bottles of brandy to Mrs. than Guernsey red wine, which was selling at that i Fit zherbert, and two bottles of wine to his landlord. time at £2B ; witness understood that Mr. Cowie I Lord ELLENEOROUGII said, one important question tasted the wine at the docks before he bought it. In answer to a question from Lord Ellenborough, the witness said the wine called Guernsey red wine was partly French red wine, but altogether it way such a mixture as he could not describe, though he was quite certain there was no port wine in it. Mr. Reynolds, a wine broker, examined the wine in question at the request of Mr. Harbuine, and found it to be wine of a very inferior quality, and wine to which he could not give a name ; it was of a non-de script specieft though he admitted it had all sot ts of names, some calling it Guernsey red wine. Lord ELLENBOROUGH —" If you were asked what sort of wine you called that sold to the plaintiff, what would you say ?" Mr. R. " Guernsey red wine."— Lord E. 4lt your were asked whether it was port wine, what would you say ?" Mr. R. " No." Mr. Bradley proved that the wine in question was part of some wine imported as Guernsey red wine, and sold to Mr. Day as such. Lord Etumaoltoutint observed, that the defendant described the wine to be delivered to the plaintiff as port wine ; therefore he had a right to assume it as such when he tasted it ; and if the wine delivered were not port wine, the defendant had not fulfilled his contract ; therefore the plaintiff was entitled to a vet-- dict.—The Jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff for £ll7, being the difference between the prices of port wine and that delivered. Lord ELLENBOROUGH, on learning that the plaintiff intended to keep the Guernsey red wine, observed to i the plaintiff's Counsel, " Oh, then you know what to do with it." in this case was, whether Andrews was a dealer, in that sense of the word which would bring him within the meaning of the Bankrupt Laws ? A publican merely selling beer to be drank within his own house, certainly did not come within the meaning of the Act; how tar sending it out in pots would render him a dealer, had never yet been determined ; and if the Jury should determine that question in the affirmative, they would distinctly state that opinion. With respect to the wine, and brandy sent to Mrs. Fitzherbert, if it should appear to them that they were solitary in stances, and not forming part of a general practice, neither would that bring him within the Act. Whe ther the assignment in question was executed with a fraudulent intention wis another circumstance for their consideration ; it did not appear that there was any secrecy in the transaction —on the contrary, it appeared to have been publicly known to several per sons, and that all the money owed by Andrews at ' Brighton was paid, and he had a considerable sum of money to spare ; and therefore it was fair to presume that it was not made with a fraudulent intention. The Jury found a verdict for the defendant : and at the same time declared their opinion, that a publi can sending out porter in pots to his customers, diu NOT constitute him a dealer, within the meaning of the Bankrupt Laws. HARDY In PANTIIER AND SOX. This was an action to recover £llOB 17s. Id. the amount of coffee sold and delivered to the defendants. BOYCE V. WARBeIITO. This was an action for breach of contract. The plaintiff, by his brokers, Messrs. Young and \Vrixon, had sold a quantity of deals to the defendant ; which were stated in the contract to be Greffyl deals : the contract also specified, that the purchaser should have the privilege of selecting and returning such deals as were broken or sappy. Defendant was to pay £95 per hundred for planks of 14 feet lone, and from tuo to three inches thick. The plaintiff was represented as a person totally ignorant of the timber trade ; and at the time the contrast was entered into, the broker had not seen the deals, but acted merely from the re presentation which the plaintiff had made to him of their quality. The defendant, on the deals being sent to him, refused to receive them, alledging that they were not Grettyl deals, as he had been taught to believe, but that they were an inferior description of Stockholm deals ; the timber-merchants always un derstanding the deals exported from Greffyl to be "rough-sawn," by a machine, while those from Stock- holm were " fine-sawn" by the hand, which was the case with the deals in question. Mr. Young, who drew up the contract, statetl, that if he had seen the deals before the contract had been entered into, he would not have sold them un der the designation of Greffyl deals : they appeared to him to be an inferior description of Stockholm deals, worth - perhaps from three to four pounds per hundred less than real Greffyls. He, however, un. derstood that they hat latterly got into the habit of " fine sawing" their worst timber at Greffyl ; he had seen cargoes , alledged to have been manuactured there, similar to those of the plaintiff, but he could not speak from his own knowledge. Mr. Pratt, who purchased the deals at Greffyl for Plaintiff, swore positively that they were, although fine-sawn, bona fill Greffyl deals. He had never known during the period he resided at Greffyl and Stock holm, any deals sent from the latter place to the former for the purpose of exportation. It appeared, that the plaintiff e:posed to sale, by public auction, great quantities of coffee, at Garra way's, on the 224 , May last, and that the defendants purchased 17 lots of damaged coffee at such sale. Mr. Bishop, the broker, who sold the coffee in question, acknowledged that inquiries were made at the time of the sale, to know whether any of the bags of damaged coffee had been repacked : and that he answered, he did not know—he knew nothing about them—that he sold them with all faults, gave no warranty, and that the buyers must take them as they found them, the goods being sold for the benefit of underwriters —they might give what they pleased for the goods, but they could not warrant them. The coffee was warehoused in the West India Dock Com pany's warehouses, who, on the back of the receipts which they gave, had charged, as specified on the backs of said receipts, a sum of £6O altogether for new bags, to repack the damaged coffee, and witness had paid that money for such new bags and packages. The ATTORNEY GRNERAL, on the part of the deten. dants, here interposed. He submitted that the plain tiff must be non-suited, as their accredited agent had sold goods that had been repacked, and for which repacking he had paid the West-India Dock Com: pony, while he stated to the buyers, when asked f the coffee were in the old bags, that he did not know of its being repacked. Damaged coffee, re-packed, was not worth above two-thirds of what it is when in the old bags, and that, too, for this reason—when coffee, damaged by the sea, remained in the old bags, there was a very great chance of finding a great por tion of it not damaged, the sea having very probably only affected the corners oi . the packages ; but if, on the contrary, this coffee was repacked, it got so mixed by the operation, that it was next to impossible to se-I parate the good from the damaged. That accounted' for the depreciation in value of damaged coffee when repacked. Mr. GARnow contended, on the part of the plain- , tiff, that the sale was such as ought to be effectual ; fes the broker had said, that he did not know of their being repacked, and told the persons present at the sale that they might give what they pleased for the (goods, but that he would not warrant them. Lord ELLENBOROVGLI observed, that it was always 'to be presumed that a man knew what it was his bu siness to know where he had adequate means in his In consequence of the decision that was given in the case of Mr. CAPILL, that the owners of grounds power to obtain such knowledge. In the present in stance, it was the Broker's business to know if any of the ' had a right to prevent persons going over them after ; damaged coffee was repacked, and he had the means in hounds, and, particularly the owners of them after his power of obtaining such Information, for he had, notice, two or three packs of fox-hounds have already antecedently to the sale, paid for the repackages. The been brought to the hammer. Broker had inadvertently informed the buyers that he In a late case determined in the Court of King's did not know of any repackages, and by that impro- Bench, it has been ruled that parish officers cannot vident observation, induced persons to buy at a price maintain a right to assess without they first prove from which, under other circumstances, they would not what lands or premises they claim their rates ; and have agreed to give. Ile pl+intiliwas accordingly that it is not for them to oblige a person who may be Non-suited. 1 aggrieved to prove they are In the wrong. Lord ELLENBOROVOids in summing up the evidence, lamented the want of precision which so frequently was observable in contracts. Had the contract be. fore them specified " good rough-sawn Greffyl deals," instead of plain " Greffyl deals," there would have been an end of the action. because they did not come under the former denomination. But as" Gref. fyl deals" were alone specified, and a witness, whose evidence had no right to be doubted, had sworn to the fact of their being that description of timber, he thought the defendant must abide by the contract.— Verdict for plaintiff £ll4. COUNIRT MARKETS. Datiarri, July 26.—This day's market was again s h ot, there being only 452 bolls of grain. —Wheat o f 6.-c leaky readily, be,t 46a. second 445. infetfor 34c—Barley Y)ti. to Olt' 241. to 31s. Pease and Beans 30% '0 38s. per hal. July 30.—There were 400 holb Oatmeal ,n e.e : gr,.l new made meal found a ready sa'te, while Hferior a:sd ell heavy and cheaper ; best 275. 9J. second 275. iii!etier 2t,s. • . boll ; retail Is. 94. par peck. Magdalen Fl,ll Fair, Hants, commenced on Thurst:av h.t the weather prcoin z r fine, much cOinpaisy abrade'. Th, c w... great quantity or cheese, price from Ws. to 702. aad 8.4 pu ss also a good chew of horses, prime ones sold dear. Tregony Fair last week produced a goAl sinew of hora t 4 cattle, which sold pretty freely at good prices. The annual Sheep Fs::, at Broad Oak Ptah), Dicker , Suot t , on Monday se'tin:ght, exhibited shout 10,000 lambs, and luti ewes, of the South 1)0 Xll breed. 'lli were nearly all sc:d, Sy the lambs fetched lions 11s. to 242. per head; we prime loit.b. mined tni. but the general run W3S from 161. to 17s. Ey% fetched train %3s to Ss.. Welch and D:vomltirc cattle wen. heavily, at somewhat reduced rireq. The Oat and barley Harvest has C2IIICIC: cod in the Isle 4 Thanet, and on several of the open land , . is E.ist Kt:a, al I Utz of Wheat was repeated to begin 111 the tours.: or rho prt.seet week. The appearance in general, and of the label grain kii..e: titular, is represented as al:undaat in ,uantity and fine in qualcy. Barley ha: vest began also on Monday sesimight on the Mau.' in Renfrew%inre. bat 1 rti. On the 4th inst. at Ilenhasnllia.l: in Suff 1 the ; t ight I:t4 Lady Rous of a son. imr,day last, at ilampton Court-palate, the Lady of Lieut.. mt-Colonel Brat!) I , of the Coldstream (Wards, f a Jaegt T. MAK►t IL►'. Saturday, at Woolwich, Captatnj. F. Jones, of the It o• A$ tillery, to Louisa. youngest daughter of the late Win 4 / 1 ,.1h, freasurer of his 111:1.•Ity's Ordna:.ce. •Thursday, at 1.. m asham, the !ter. Edward Allen, Inn of Wm, Allen, Eq.uf I..;:wiillaut, to Ann, the y.nolgt.-st dauitiztr of Joh% St. Barb:•, Esq. of Dartntouth-row, Bi.w.koeath. --It SI r.tttor..upon..kstou, the ttev. Woo. Hatu viezr of rsbeso-trtiittc, St.l.p, to Con .taratia, wood ut tt.e ktv. Dr. Dtverpurt, Rector of Bar:lwclL . M K Air. S. obi::5oil, of liallyrozkart. !ream!, a:ci 76, to liar F.lizab-th .1:o1 A Ili of the same place, age.l 17. int D. Saturday last, Mrs. Winbolt, wife of the Rcv. 1 n •t as Win. bolt, Mini.tt•r of Soot l•gatt• Chapel. On the ‘27th of Njventbt•r last, in the fort of Luft, in Peru, near the Gulph of lia*sora, I it-et co tnt Stanilish Weld, Of Ins \ .i. jelty's 47th Regiment, youngest son of Etlinund %.k di , Lsq.vf Molesworth-street, Dublin. • TO-MORROW. Sus rises, I Son sets, Moon este, 33 minutes after 4 27 minutes after V. 0 I-1 WA (ER AT 1.0141101.4 YIL.LhAk. Morn! ..... 10 minute. raw y Afternoon ..••• •• ••• 0 nin•tces a -:irr RENOVATED HEALTH. I T has been too frequently the subject of just and general reprobatloo, tl:at men destitute of the elements d the nrsPcal an have offered themselves as car.didates for public patronage in the profession of Physic. For the purpose of ig justice to the result of our studies and experience, sand to prt vt.o us from being classed among those empirio whose impudent] rs. tensions have, unfortunately for society, been tie favout..bly re. ceived, we beg leave to submit to the hberal and ettlighwit,J, a faithful statement of our pursuits and acquirements. After having received a regular medical edueatiiimas pith of Messrs. Griud..l and Blizard, whose lectures and practice we carefully attended, u Professors and Surgeons of the London Hue. pital, we entered ouraelves as studerts itt that justly celebraief school for medical acquirements, the Royal College of Lib burgh, and were instructed in the different branches of Anatorly, Surgery, the Theory and Practice of Physic, Chemistry, M:11. wifery, Botany, &c. &c. &c. by those etnineet Prof( ssw., Dr. Monro, Gregory, Black, Hamilton, lluocan, and Rutherfotd. We trust we shall not be deemed presumptuous in sayitig, nut our proficiency and acquiremeots are not inconsiderable. basil/ for a long series of years made VENMZI.:AL COM I'LAIN an. the various diseases of DI:Bi LI i'V, the particular obj , ct cl our studies and practice, it will, we by be zliowed 'hat we have acquired superior know ledge of their treatment and are. to slight and recent cases of inf. ction, a perfect resestabliiiiien• i. completed in the short per oil of two days, and in thow of to utmost inveteracy, where other practitioners have tailtkl of sue. cess, a proper perseverance in our plus of treattuent einoirwito the patient a safe and rai heal cure. Amidst the melancholy variety of disorders which are the ef. vets of a habit long and most unhappily pursued by the youth of both sexes, there are none more alarming or more distressing that those tivficiencirt and debilities which frequently prevent or era bitter the matrimonial state. To such persons it must be a Lea• soling reff..ction to know that they may slow, by a new and intal , lible mode of treattne:et, be restored to that greatest or all Mama blessi4s, a strong, manly, and vigorous constitution. le abuses of debility, from whatever cause aristeg, as we II as in every spe. cars of Venereal infection, we may he consulted by ps Tents of either sex with the grew ett secrecy and honour. H turn of can. -u'tation at home from tea to three, aed front ail in the evening till ten at night. Patients in the country are requested to state the partleohn their case, age, and general habit of living, &c. inclontig a want lance for advice and medicines, when the same will be x yeti Sr sent to any part of the kingdom. To ensure that seater so es• synth! to our undertaking. the postage of letters may be adsted se .he account for medicines. _ . CURRIE and Co. Surgeon., N 0.107. Hanoit.Gardis. BY tils MADL:iTY'S ROYAL. LETTERS PATEN 1. LEAKE's Genuine PILLS, so justly &mous for their superior efficacy in curing every eregree and symptom of the Venereal Disease, the Scurvy, &C. without confinement or restraint of diet, iv an easy, cepedit:ous, safe, and secret nue nrr. One small tasteless Pill is a dose, its operation importer tilde, and requiring no particular attention. In 13 days they generally cure those crud Disorders ; and where they fall in that time of perfectly restoring health, the pr ! tient has the happy assurance that be or she is at t::e e% rut being sn resmored, let the degree of malignancy be ever so greet. I; is an excellency pecii:i ir to these Pills, to make directly to :he complaining part, and enter into contest with di.: offending .natter, which they speedily dislodge and expel. Tk v arc decla red by mrperience to be a preserver of health, as well's. a me. rer, by taking only eight single Pills Seringand fall ii, every years in short, the Patentee has this extraordinary obligation to t! en', that whatever he promised himself front them, they were sure el filth! and exceed, as though impatient of immortal and univeral same. These Pills are mos- worthy a place in the cabieets et Mast era and Captains of ships; the more so, for at they will keep good in all climates any length of time, and that they have now borne the test of near t;0 years, with increasing credit tc themselves, mid honour to their author, insomu ch that durirg Cu last eight years they have radically cured upwards of 40,0e0 per sons, many of whom had been discharged from Hospitals where salivation had been frequently repeated, and all other tu:iticel made use of without diect. _ Prepared and Sold by the Sole Proprietor, Tao t.ts T.tvr na Member of t he Royal College of Surgeons in Londe:l,2i No. 9, New Bridge-street; where be will give advice, w.thocr Fee, to p.rsotts takiag these Pills, and will answer Pati eats Let• ten, if post-paid, nn the same terms, observing is all :SW U 4 Mast inviolabk secrecy, no patitsn's name or cast having ben mention 4, but at their own particular request, by the Prprietnr• during the course of more than 40 years, that he has had the con• ducting of an extensive sale of the above medicine, and the roc flee arising therefrom. They are also sold, by his sppointramt, at the Perforce% Ne S.S., St. Alban' , -street, ; the 'fuy-,bar, No. 103, tll -d -street; Mr. Distxwolth's, No. 7, Fist-street-11.111, nea opposite the Monument ; and by our P..- - ion iu every consideratis town in England, late. in Bose, of only :3. IM. task leal 4 with full and plain directions, whereby person, rf either sot awl cure thrmsclvss with ewe reid secrecy. N. B. Every Box • .Ul4 Grist Erualai seek:lop with a IWO' on which, by favour:if the Conunisrlonua,is printed at the Sault 0 dice " Taylor, No.9,New Bridges, street." LONDON : Prin . -a and publtaba bf LEVEL KEN t STA a-01 ri -r, Ne. t , t.arry-wact, sad lathe StAa•Vegg s. I '1 cavil-kat.