Star. — London, England, 1817-11-19 00:00:00

t • SPATAi*tePtif*l4Witilhe'Lli-tKsTF. , e:: - . s mis , LONDON iti,II2I:ATS, NOYEMIIER 18. CC I T —T"er • w..s crinsk!erable interest cached by ••t 1 he sale of '250 ha,;. Beng . tl Cotton being • •• -* Piti , ; last ; it w.rs expected the • ..,net t•st.t1)1101 a tit t currency. but there we no purchasers ; niter a t rw lots had been taken i it the whole were iv:Ottawn ; a disposition ras been evinced by the holderc rf Bengals to effect sales at a reduction. but no contracts t f consequence hay , yet rake- :1 :e ; one of the causes mentioned f r the er•at wish to itfe•ct elks last seek was, that the India Company advertis-.1 4::• Hui hates Su rat., arid 4/198 bales B-og:els for sal" the 28th Met. ortt the loo2r were expecied to be increast•d to 74• T; teller. The saki of Cotton last week by private eon •ract :re exceedingly limirett-110 ttlaranhains - at It few Petuants 2 • 'P i !. 9 t roweds %via. old ~bent Its) Berm; ik at J:fferent prizes. a consi..e. Table t top:rims 11:t. to 12 I. in bond. & natl .—The demand for Moscovadm rather ins• proved towards the close or lAA %yea ; the ptyclidons were attracted to the mat ket by the „that decline of th-, prices, ng nearly 10s. per cwt. within two car !Wee weeks, and as the winter supplies for the home r.s impost must shindy be required, and the pa Ices having been reduced to moderate rates, the market look* d considerably better. there was more confidence amoag , t the holders ; it was calculated above 2.514 casks lead betn sold durng the we , k ; Cle prices at te, however. a..slrade lower—brown Jama . ca: h e i, ig disposed of at 755. and 765. and strong wuskirtg par cels 775. to 795. The holders had anticipated that from the ap prarauce oi the market last week, the deliveties from the war!rnuse would be muse extensive, but there . were only aletut 2000 casks ; the holders have, in Fonsequence, again shewed an increasing disposition to effect sales, and a further seduction of Is. per cwt. has taken place. There was a good demand for refined Sugars last week ; :he wholesale grocers were reported to be purchasing for the home sueple v and several contracts were reported for speitg shipments ; for crushed Su gar 61.5. 655. staifSti In be realized for parcels deli verabie in February aucl March Lext.-•-Nlolasses were in limited request. Cornet.—The demand for Coffee has leen very limited ; three pubic saies were, brotii.;ht forward last week ; the first consisted ot 1000 bags Brasil."' fin , ordinary 9 is. gond ordinary 83s. and 88s. 61 the sec• rid was an inconsiderable sale; Voi.third rather t; o extrusive for the present limited deAand ;—the poses to British 14..ntt 'ion eats: were, however, main wined—good cr.rinary Jamaica 88s. and 88s. 6d. fine ordinary 91s. middling 914 6d. fine ordinary to middling St. Lucia 91e. to 965. 6J,-12d casks 439 bags Foreign descriptions met with no buyers. ' false Puovistions. Prime Beef continues i n re. 'queit.—Rork is still in request.—Bacon continues dt.eatied both in the demand and . in inices.—No variation I.as taken place in Butter. Om —The prices ot Oil continue to decline; ,C 54 'is tile last realized price for Whale Oil. Rape has declined 44 to £5 the cause of the stagnation ot trade, and the genet al decline in the prices, continues •ep he atti 'bated to the very high rates to which the s:etulation has driven the prices of 0.1 up to ;—the usual coniurnption has been prevented. The letters from Hull yesterday, in stating the decline of the prices in that market, observe, that there is no busi ness doing ; the trade, in place of the large orders formerly given, purchase a ton or two at a time, and have recourse ko every expedient to lessen consump. titn, and to find substitutes for Whale Oil. Rice.—Carelina Rice continues scarce, the late prices are fully maintained ; the greeter proportion of the late East India iruports are stated to be sold. T.u4cco.—There hate been considerable transac tions in Tobacco ; the asrivats are n ot so exte n s i v e as had been expected. Marylands arc a shade higher ; lei cargoes 675. and 68s ate asked. A considerable pariel of Virginia irt cargoes 55.. and 66s.—Ken- Mai 484:1,6 gas. • NAVAL &Num.—There are no sales of Rough Turpentine ; the parcels lately arrived remain in the. :importers' hands ; they would, it is stated. accept of rims A stride lower than what has lately been de saamied.. Spirits ere little varied. In Tar, Fifth, wad :Rosin, there is little variation. HMO, FLAxi. ASID Tat.Low.—The prices of Tal- - &ova shade iower,, and very heavy at the de ' line. • Hemp is flute soled. Flax may be quoted isrinsell advance. AusivErtanpv, row Hr .nuns.—There have been wavy •estensive It ansactions• in 'Rum ; on Friday it was stated that intehionce had been received that ' he French Government bad agreed that the Allied :Armies should be supplied from this coulary with Rum, being the cheapest spirit that could be pro. toed, • On raccoo n' rit the lagure of the vintage in -France.; the demand for Ron: become immediate aid extensive. Ltewatti islands ad. anted 6d. to 9d. .per gallon i .jam ,iCa descriptionr 9.1. to ls.—on da iturday and Monday there WAS little business done, ncl anveral parcels were disposed of at a small de. !tile. - This forenoon there has been little liminess . lag, bii the holder s c ontinue san g uine that the I ant is tone, though no of i:ial statement can be '• iven. Brandi* co:aiuuc to rise rapidly, on acc..unt . the scarcity. Geneva is 3d. to 6d. per gallon higher. • COURSE OF EXCHANGE. nriteclon f 6 ik6U. Barcelona 00 Litwin 0;81 37 0 Balla 981 [ ~ A nister....*, . it OC. F. st. srbaclan 00 at siert 1 / 1. Gabrxhar 2be w Onto etting% 11 11 2U. I Lrghorn, 491 Antwerp 1% 1t Olsson, 464) Antwerp $4 911 U. Ver.iev,n. C. I.tv . Piccolo f I oto • . St 10 2U. ineffective per i..tet 26 $, Is s days - date 94 4o Mahn 47 r to 24 60 6U. N3plcs, 464 don lif 60 Palentio, timd pet oil. es Lisbon, ant niaort en the ' ?Arun I}Sl en Me. Oporto, £B3 r ' wind nsi effective Rio Janeiro 6s Ca‘li a as email,. I Dublin, si . 11ev de 671 Cork. • ' 81 AO orate Bonk on Holistic' a pet Cent. reprieve, during pleasure, hat been receives! at Pe' • rig; for latiorge irel,7hrisan,s nit : o r the prisoners 'remolded of High 'rreAbbm . • • • r The sentence Of death pronounced at last Circuit *gains' William Hamilton. for robbing a jeweller's !shop. in Ayr. arid a/bich was respited during the trinc e s ,, p i c asato, has now beta corarapted to 14 rears tramportation. ' ' 1.4 W INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF CHANCERY, NOVEMBER IS. Tl.ts morning the _Lotto CHANCIELLOR intimated, that in con4equence of the funeral of the much la mented an., ever to be regretted Princess CIIARLaTTB, the Court wculd not meet to-morrow. Of the pro priety of thi. arrangement, under the present melan choly eircumivance•, lie was sure the Gentlemen at the Bar were lullmawdre. BRiANT V. BRYANT. The LrtoCitAaceu.on ` .64 I observe Mr. Bryant is now in Comm, and have iv) doubt but he is •cry 4 oxi us to 'mow my deciiion. I have read with the utmost Atentinn the cnnflicting lavits and state ments in th•r case. and I am now ready to give judg ment. Mr. Bryant had therefore better be in Court 'on Thursday morning by tin t.'cluck, as I shall then without fad give fins and you all my judgment." His Lordship rose at one o'clock. COURT OF EXCHEQUER, NOVEMBER ie. SIR WATKIN LLWEI V. NORGAN. This d.ty judgment was pronounced in favour of the in the important and long-pending cause between Sir W. Leers and Mr. John Morgan. The motion before the Court was, that Sir Watkin should be put into possession of his emus, so long held by the defendant, Mr. John Morgan. Attty Counsel were' heard, Mr. 80-on GRAHAM 1i: it emceed:A to deliver his opi.nott, which la: did its the renewing manner t— `• I hope 1511411 nut excite any surprise in the minds of my Leained Brvihren, when I declare to them, that 1 am now teady to•proci ,, d to judgment, with out ally further consideicaion of this case—a case which has occupied so much attention, as to carry samething like opplobritam ,on that system of jitris. prudence in this country, which has been long and justly the admiiarion of the world. I have another reason for determining to give my opinion now, be cause this opinion is so made up and decided, that I am !tee to say nothing which can occur by longer procrastination of the cause is likely to shake rt is the smallest degree. The applicatiow Write us is in two parts. I reject the latter, the beariug of certain atfiticsits, becauaa I think them now unnecessary ; but i embrace the former, namely, the letting in Sid Watkin Lewes into the possession at his estates, and the making Mr. John Morgan refund the money he has received out of these (states, ultra the payment of what is called the mortgage money, for which they oere otiginally invested. This motion is grounded on a report 21 , ,ide by the Deputy Remembrancer, in consequence of two appeals to the House of Lords, who directed that a certain account should be taken, and the result communicated to this Court. The House of Lords, when it math this order, definitive ly stated that the mortgage &none) , alone came into the hands of Juhu Morgan, in his capacity as tag, ni to Vie estate, and in no other. By the Deputy Rem- ni brancer's report, it appears that the whole of this mortgage money (originally stated to be d? 12.0019 was paid oft, principal and interest, in the year 1804; and that so tar as the acconntr ot rents, profi,s, and value of timber tut down, were since takes, that is, up to 1807, John Morgan had received, ultra this mortgage sum (the only one he was entitled to re ceive in the situation in which he stood), £999, which, at a calculation made in the most favourable manner for the defendant, must now leave in his hands di'4sl:9 beyond tf.e mortgage claim. On ge neral principles, then, why should not this sum be given up to the plaintiff, to whom of right it belongs? It is hold to answer this question. The mortgageel has paid die mortgagee, the receiver (if be be the receiver) has taken beyond the amount of his trust; why thed should not the surplus so paid be given bask to the real owner ? Now let us revert to the original frame of the bill filed in 1783, on which John Morgan lays tire stress of his being an injured man, and one to whoM the plaintiff is still largely indebted. According to the matter an which that bill is founded, it appears that Morgan told Sir Wat kin he bad teceived £13,000 for bim which he would account for in the general settlement. The latter, astonished at bearing this, naturally wonders how a ltrger sum than two or three thousand pounds could have been at that early period received by the defen dant on his account. Sir Watkin then says,. It that be the case, pay off the mortgage ; I'll pay you also every halfpenny I owe you, and give me back my estates.' Under this idea, and under this infor mation, Sir Watkin files his original bill, and makes the above declaration. But did he, when he said so, ever mean to charge his estates, in alegal sense, in this manner with any sums beyond the mortgage account ? He did not, he could not; for the settled estate put it out of his power to exceed the terms of the original investiture. Suppose it were possible to bind him to the words of the original bill, ace bow every feature of the case, as it then stood, has been subsequently altered. When the answer of Mr. John Morgan was put into the bill, Sir Watkin naturally s.id, I never received this money he alludes to.'-- Well, then, another alteration, giving the cause a different shape, took place in 1901, when the separate it:pint was Made; x double'motion' was then made, apparently with The conturrence of both parties, and I semenitur very little argued ; the result of that motion was deemed unsatisfactory, and an appeal to the Houle of Lords followed. On that occasion the House of Lords unquestionably d;sallowed the claimed - by Morgan, as against the trustees, under a bond of John Adams and others, and said this is ad shoaling, and desired that the Deputy Re otembrancer should put this bond out of that part of his inquiry, and confine himself to an. account of the &molds sums paid originally to Sir Watkin Lewes by the trustees, and the monies afterwards had in re duction thewsol. Morgan, thus finding himself con victed (for I cannot use a softer term) of the legal fraud of attempting to charge this bond on the trus tees, then turns round and charges it on the estate.— =lbis was nothing less than trifling with the justice of the House of Lords ; and supposing that, by an aCt of iniquity detected elsewhere, he was-entitled to an advantage in equity merely by shifting bid g roun d; The Hduse of Lards put Adams's bond out of the question, and threw him, be his claim what it may, pro canto, not on the estate in right of mortgage, but on the general issue as a crekiiior.e , • •The Learned Banos, 'alter a variety of arru. runts, decided that Sir Watkin Lewes shpuld'o e ' let into tho possession forthwith of the est ates; and that Mr. Joao Morgan should, within a reasonable . _ time, pay into Court the sums he had received since the mortgage was paid off, to abide the issue of the general account. Mr. Baron WOOO deV-ered his opinion at great length, and in direct opposition to the judgment po• flounced by the rrecedinZ Baron Gaanow, in a most impressive speech, de., dared his fnll and unqueiified c,:ncurrence in the judgment so ably delivered by Baron Graham. In every comment he made, whether of elucidation or animadversion, he decidedly acquiesced. The sub ject was only known to. hitu (Baron Gtrrow) as it WAS unto the public, until heiook a seat at the Bench, and from the first moment it was brought b-lore him, he felt it a duty tn have the decision as prompt as possible, as, abstractedly sneaking, he could nut but consider such a piotracted litigation a repioach to the administration of justice. It was with regret he differed from his Learned Brother who last addressed the Court. Much was said of the ability and capa city of Sir Watkin Lewes to guard himself against fraud. But to those observations he would answer, that every day's experience proved, as his Learned Brother ( Baron Graham) had so justly said, that candid imposition was as successful in practising its deceits on the confidence as on the distresses and ig norance of its victims. His own impres%ion ss as, that the amount of the received rents since the pay. ment of the mortgages, ought to be forthwith paid 'over to Sir Watkin Lewes, that they slight to con stitute a fund to enable him to pursue his claims, and not be longer left is the hands of him who at the moment be held the possession of the estates, by arm-' ing himself with the whole property of Sir Watkin Lewes, had consigned him and the heiress of a flue estate to penury, and the father to long continueJ imprisonment. But, under every cnbsiJaation of the case, and in the hope of furthering the ends of justice, he concurred in the decision of his Learned Brother; lie trusted that this case would read a wholesome lesson to Solicitors, who, as they valued: their character and property, would be circumspect in their conduct, when they became loan dealers to their clients. The Defendant was, therefore, decreed forthwith' to give up possession of the estates, and to appear on the Ist day of nest Term to settle a ;inie lot the pay ment -1 the money he received since 1804. The Court was extremely crowded, and this Judg ment excited great interest, and appeared to give general satisfaction. A further motion was about to be made by M r . AUAH, asking the directions of the Court, that Sit Watkin Lewes might be all:rwed to take rests on the balance of the received rents; that is, that in every year the amount ol trot received ex.:vetted the lute• rest of the mortgage, interest should b.: Hilotsed for the surplus to Sir Watkin. This ulterior motion was fixed for argument on Saturday next. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER Is. ROBINSON AND OTHERS ARMSTRONO AND ANOTHER. This was an action at debt against the intiabilauts of the Hundred of Etsington, in the County of Durham, founded upon the statutes of 1. Geo. 1. c. 5, and 52 Geo. 111. c. 130, to recover ;he amount of damage done by the destruction of a stable, and two stairs, or warehouse* for coals, the property of the plaintiffs, which were partly destroyed, or pulled down, by a *iambs and tumultuous assemblage ot keelmen, on the 20th of March, 1815. At the Sommer Assizes for the County Palatine of Dothan:, in 1815, the Jury found a verdict for the subject to the opinion of this Court, upon a case which stated the following facts :—The plaintiffs were colliers at Newbottle, on the river Wear, in the County of Duiham, and occupied two buildings, called stairs, as warehouses for the purpose of depo siting coat; and at the time of the transaction in . question, one of hie staifs was filled with about 1,000 chaldron of coals, and the other contained four or five chaldront. 'Chews buildings were composed of • walls built with stone, with trellis windows, and the roofs were of timber and coverial with tiles. On the 20:11 of March, 1815. the keelmen on the rivet Wear rose in a tumultuous body, and tiotously and out rageously proceeded to demolish the stable and other buildings in question. Having first tore off the tiles and broke open the doors, they set fire to the stalls and coals therein, which were p a rtly coasurned.— During these violent proceedings two of the plaintiffs were present for a part of the time, endeavouring to protect their property, but Mr. Robinson having been wounded severely, he was compelled to retire for safety, and the other partner was also compelled to seek his safety under a threat of personal violence. On the 25th of March Mr. Robinson, in pursuance of the 4th Section of the 52 Geo. 111. c. 00, was eaamined before two Justices, and made 'o oh that he did not know the persOns who had ccaoriii‘ied ttie said outrageous acts, aud this oath was IlialAr the purpose of enablirig him toproceed against the Hun dred for the recovery of the damage done to die pre mises of himself and partners. • • re further stated, dist the other partner who also had bean present during part 'of the riotous proceedings ot the keel men, bad not made the like oath bond the said Ju stices ; and under these circutnstances there were two questioe.s raised; ISt,' Whether it was necessary tor all tie plaintiffs, there being three in number, to make the like oath which had Wen taken by Robin son'? And second, Whether the erections, called Suit's, came within the description of buildings mentioned in the Act of Ilsirliament, which the lino dred a ould be l:able to make good Mr. TYNDALE appeared for the plaintiffs, and en-1 deavoured to establish, on' the authority tit a case Carthew's Reports, 143, in which reference was also ' made to Jones's Case, Mich. Term, IHIS, and Lhid a. the Hundred of Ossulston, that it was tufficient for one of the partners to make the oath in question; in order to entitle himself and partners to . maintain the action. The Com% . however,•standing upon this preljrni. nary objection, were of opinion that it w.ts detlitvels against the plaintiffs' right to tecover, in:ramrod) ay according collie true constsuction of the 4th section of the. Act, all the persons inttrested in the result of the action ought to have taken the oath, in order to purge themselves of all suspiciOn of h.tving partici pated in the outrages; or of having knowledge of the persons by whom they had been Coninnitted ; and therefore, without hearing the other side, gave judg- Must of-44onsuit. , . iiAKV V. JACOB. Mr. ScARIATT 'hewed Cat:se a i gning a rule of Mr. ;Tindal, calling upon theidiaintili beCttr4y tur costs to lets ease (which was an :ration on the ground that the plaiutif wrb a co::vi:Ld :004 now confined on board a tranv.rt in P.:1 t ",,,„.. 1 Dock, having been sentcncei vtAr.! : p:;ttation, uI a conviction a. t! e I:,i t),.1 r:.. swos, fair Lavin4 forg..4 The Learned Counsel sehmi:.ec tkit could not be required of tLe phint:tf, inas t ," Stay damage he ens 1:1:c1y recuver matter of course, go to the Cronsi : and he to a case in t Taunton, 61, wins, : it wets he:d th 4 the Cc urt will no: cumpel security for costs En ground that the plaintiff' is a bankrupt, or it: N,,,1 gate r but Mr. TINDAL being heard in support of his P; : ! e, and having reterre4l to several caws andlogous t',, TLe Court tinusglit the case kyles atb to such security, e nd therefore made the If CXESAL Or TUC Pill' CESI CRAM:MIL Lord ELLENDOIROUGH announced that this O ut w0.,1d not sit tri-utorriv, except fur the . ;wisi t ... tion of hAil 6 but desired it to be unders.ood, Hutia the VMS which stood in his Lcrddlip's pape-ro, t his second Sittings in Tom to-nwricw, though f ag could not be then tried. )eit lhe Plairltilfs wt.° :Wild recov:4 verdicts in the Sittings atter '!'.-t tr., w ou l.i be entitled to judgment as of this Term. Mes.wiNeHouse.—Yesterday Jowl: 7 Aortas Brown, the former' 14, and the litter aep t . ready net more than 10 years of age, we le to up. charged with the follow ing rot)isay Whitey:re, Esq.. of Frederick's Place, scu d, that tie w•ss passing through Thieadneed!ce.ttect wends Austin. Friars, when tie was hustled toy the te e te e sneers in crossing the toad, the younger one !wee., violently agailitt Lim. while the other. in the r..t.e,'. 1 :ion of the moment, threst his hand into the vetie coet poeket of the witness, •ind ran eff. H: instrrely missed his pocket-honk, and was abo.ut to pursue Use b:;y. when a eentleman hended it to hiss, !eying le had picked it up. The prisoner Thomas was put. sued and taken near the London Tarim, sad Lis ctorropenien was seemed 1 y an OrGcer. who etome up at the time. Time priscr.eis totaliy der.ied the eliosl:r, and declared they were hotel sir...sleets to each via. The falsehood sit this last assertion was provcd by, gentleman named Scott, who swore that he saso . Ile prisoners in company, and meitine signals to each other about a quarter of an hour previous to the vb. bevy in question, and that he then saw the younger one follow a gentleman to the door of the New Foe land Ceffee-house, looking into his soet.pocket was ripen, in the most daring manlier. 9is searching the prisoner Brown, 21e. in silver and a small p:.ir sof scissars '.vere found. The LOUD MAYOR regret:et that the gentleman who picked up the pocket-he's was not present, as his evi,!ence would be tuateCol This lois Lordship observed was a case of considerable consequ-rece, end utig;it to be made the subject of a', prosecution, as othfl - wise merchants and others in the neighbourhood of 'Change, who were conotandy' gloving about, soinetitnes with immense property about them, would be daily subjected to iepreda. tions of this kind. The prisoners were reruaetioel till a Nuke day. Gurennace-e-Firtes.-.-Yesterday Messrs. Beata and Cr; tresusitt e tita, Proprietors of the Red Lioa in Altiersgatiestreer, were summoned to KVS:t CI use complaint of the Beadles of the Ward of A.limnkne, for refusing to pay the reward for the evititti.er of .1 fire rei their premises. The Ltsamseeteer: übwive3, that ht. ecver trifling the fire at first eppeered, rent us consequences might have resulted from neglecting it, check it ; and, he was of opinion, that tile Beady had Ciolle no more than his duty, and was thetet , et entitled to the reward. Mr. Butler imniediately pale the sum claimed, dn. ss. anki costs. Mant.notiouou•xxnur.---Information was g•soi of a daring attack upon the house of Mrs. Willsdon-lane, at 12 o'clock, on Monday Mrs. Leet's servant, who was in the ect , age was alarmed by some persons bring upon toe tcp it, and she roused the servant iu a cottAge belonging to Mrs. Derlour, a here a r•etti: was sprung. The ti i yes were three in number, anti th.) hal de audacity to draw a eat close up to I: r house,:cr tin purpose of conveying aw.ty a booty. &tote tit} ran off, they uttered the most dieudful against their disturbers, and thre:de..,-.! ts, the again on the next night. Proper measures Acie rr tiered to receive them, if they dared to realise th.:l threat. MAIII4 IED. Thursday the 11th instant, a.. .ss-trr. Caren, lieutenart Rest land Pennit,gton, Istr o the 5:11 Vow, to Gto!w_na, ter at Uroolke H.q. or Cathy Hat:, linco nsh.re. DIED. Saturday, in Pcrtland.;•:..cr. is elc ys ar et his .iee, hlaj..rstienaid Wm. MiCulluch, of as Hun. }.br India Company's Letigal army. Set t. 19. at New Provicirixe, of a .hart th.. Rev. f!rth Maefatiane. M. D. oiltlioet of the l'rs•byrevisn clout:: et .t A 174ftW !bet*. Hr arrived in the Won tb of Jars 64. ;:net ISICIDOUT fay Nuthed.te. teroniniendathos arch that of as" able, an'svastselical , and con t .:le:nines n.:n 'ker." Oct. 19, Mts. liotiltbse. sr.!, ut W. Booltbse, nt Boonington, Netts. She had Ivan snirteed tie lintr c her tit-par:ars in lecturitiz a nunihsr of yol:ng pupils the Sustslay.Schuel, attd , prsitiously t:. tb:ir au.s ou. vs. I. .11e act of praying with them, when sal a st:clJsa she kit us tit liver, awl expired inustraately. Oct. 40. at Deers Banks, weir Patsley, Yorkshire. lk Ir. 11T.ick.r 13ensun, wsll a. an :it. wive :hat. r w cstCe. Lie pro. r.y, 31111LSI:l I.y careful Labus, is supeosed to asasioa t. ura .C 1 Pomo°. Nov. ~ :it Y.diubuegh, Me.. Mary Honyman, relict or t! .e Re. Alex. Nieli,dsims, Alitiat.r4.l'lltur.n, in tNe etith year ell i:tr atm Nov. at Invergowrle, Jena* iv:o.l.a'es ClaPaill., late • t.r.• !tin in the !turd scot% hi thelac ) ear 0! his sic • Nov. 10, Henry Grieie, weaver. in Paisley. He had C l '• on an aciprdnisoce on some lop .tinetrt, and in the eirre coover.stiois he was sudden!' seiaeJ ViArltt ?Ida head, and almost Instantly expired. tie yours txiihi has kit a wife antriz chihire-n. --- .1411t:10; 01. (101.1) AN!) SILVI..it. Portug4 Gold in Coin, rer 02. set 04 fit Foreign GoIS in liars - 4 Os (d. New Dousluotis - . 0 Os okl. New D - .l4.ars - .' 0 St SI Sitter in Sus • . . OSs 31.1. • . _ --- PRI . O 01CS ; 10Z3:S VF.S - 1 Ilz -- 0.% Y. Bank Stock, iniol .91 ilabl:s Stock --• . ited. Sq. iis In.juitron.n, q..s 99 ply! Cons. ssif r 5..1.. Dilto i 2 ..L, VI .7 P". .. 1 per Coot 9elf} . . .4 ,a tt .A. ,I r. 5 pet Ct. Insi ICe Ccms..lo; Av.:. s 3; , i I.z. Aons. 21 I - tti I.ort.ry Taell.. to .6;:.1 :.f• .. —.--___.--.- -....—...------ W Ws. '.l'o oIi.)ItACJOI AT 1.0141x):44 .*I. Mammal/ • SI sots 4 , :er . o 12 Pnakc..l at.4* vutd-sb, l l by Lev aL as a s lc.. Plate, Tentylr-114. •