Star. — London, England, 1822-07-20 00:00:00

humbly repreeentectto the House the propriety of im posing a tax on steam packets thus employed. Mr. CALCRAFf defended the steam packets, ti furnishing a ch ea p an d commo di ous mode of con- . I veyance tor the Public. • Mr. W. SMITH also defended the steam boats... Mr. H.GURNEY complained of the inconvenience arising from the detention of the steam vessels * at Graves-end, to make a return of their passengers. Mr. Secretary PEEL said, he had this day made an arrangement to put an end to the inconvenience complained of.--The Petition was then received, and ordered to be printed. THE DIANA TYRICISII mows's. Sir BYAM MARTIN said, an Hon. Member (Co lonel Davies) on a former night had pot a question respecting the fitting up of a Turkish ship as a ship of w.-11, in the River, to cruize against the Greeks.-- The gallant Officer then charged the Government -. with partiality, in having permitted this ship to take - on board 5$ guns and stores, and 250 British sea 'men as a crew. The facts of the case were these : -- the vessel in question, the Diana, had applied for per mission to do the proper repairs to the ship, and those of an ornamental nature. Leave was giyen by the Admiralty to do the necessary and ornamental re pairs, but nothing further; and nothing more, ac cording to the best information he could obtain, had been done. On inquiry, he found that she had a crew of fifty persons, one of whom only was an Eng 7 lishman, and that was the sailing-master ; and as to her guns, she had but fourteen on board, and they were nut mounted. In fact, the vessel came into the River as a trading vessel, and as a trading vessel only would she quit it, at least with the cognizance of Government ; and he did not believe that her agent would ~ tit Fer the Captain to risk the safety of the vessel by taking warlike stoic. on board, and thus infiiii;_;e the laws of the country. Colonel DAVIES said, he had not stated that she had 5S guns mounted, or that she had 250 men on bo:rd ; but he stated, that he had been informed she was t r be so fitted out, and this information he re ceived from the second in command. Mr. ROBINSON said, that the Captain of the ship had sent trick forty Greek sailors, the and ship was consequently inadequately manned. ALIEN BILL. Mr. PEEL moved the third reading of the Alien Bill. Mr. BERNAL opposed the motion. He nonsi der ed that the argumentative and convincing speeches of his Hon. Friends upon this subject, prevented the necessity of his going into detail, but there were a few observations which be was extremely anxious to submit to the House. There was one speech deli vered on the opposite side which he thought de,erved particular attention. He meant that of the Right Hon. President of the Board of Controul. That speech 4otttained sentiments which were quite at variance with the conclusions with which it terminated. The Right Hon. Gentleman expressed his wish to encou rage rational liberty, yet he supported this Bill, which went to repress it. He (Mr. Bernal) considered this Bill to be unjust, impolitic, and unnecessary. He proceeded to argue that no necessity existed for the measure, because a Minister might expel an Alien found plotting against the relations of amity between this and any other nation, upon his own responsibi lity, or upon application to the Foreign Minister re sident at this Court, of the nation to which he be longed. It was impolitic, because it might hereafter submit the country to demands from more powerful nations that might grow up, which would depart from its welfare and dignity. Our ancestors had always affoi-ded free protection to persecuted foreigners, and it would be a stain upon the country, as well as an injustice to such persons, if the Bill were passed. Mr. WETHERELL commenced by compliment ing his Hon. Friend, the Member for Knaresborough, upon his speech against this Bill, appreciating, as he did, as highly as any one, the brilliance which it dis played ; but he considered it also to be full of bril liant error, to which he preferred sober judgment and plain facts. Being confident that he had the latter on his side in this argument, however hazardous the undertaking might be,. he was ready to break a spear with his Hon. Friend upon this subject. The Alien Bill was coeval with the existence of the Constitu tion. If he thought the principle of the Alien Bill was new, he should pause considerably before he gave his assent to it; but it was at all times an inherent right in the Executive of this country to send an alien out of the kingdom. His Hon. Eriendhad con tended, from a passage in Magna Charta, that all fo reigners whatever had a free right to ingress, egress, and regress into this country; but that permission he .(Mr. Wetherell) would contend, referred to foreign merchants only. Had the framers of Magna Chatta refused to the Crown the power of sending foreigners out of the country, they would have refused to the Sovereign of this country what was enjoyed by every Monarch in Europe. Even in the case of merchant traders, they had no power of coming into this coun try without a license from the Crown. In no less than twenty Statutes, from the time of Magna Charts to that of Henry VI. the liberty of coming into this country was limited to merchant-traders. Even ships were not allowea to enter the ports of this country without a passport: it was necessary for the mer chant-trader also to have a safe conduct from the Crown before he could come into the country. Upon abstract principles, besides municipal regulations, every State had the power both to prevent aliens from coming into the country, and to send them out of the country after they had come into it. If the natural right had been abandoned by municipal regulations, the question would, of course, be decided against Lim ; but that, he contended, had never been the case. The Crown had the power of sending its own na- , tural-born subjects, and a fortiori must have that power in the case of aliens—(Hear, hear, heat). — By the writ of ne exeat )eg,no, no subject could leave the kingdom; and any subject could be recalled from abroad by an order under the Great or the Privy Seal. The Learned Gentleman here cited a variety of cases horn an early period 'down to the time of George I. in the case of the Duke of Wharton. In all tho e Cases, flom the State-writ, as it was termed, thereby no appeal. Lord Hale, a high authority, as several of his works had been printed by order of the House of Commons of that day, had described the King as holding the keys, of all the ports, to open and to shut them against whom he pleased. The power of the Crown, in sending aliens out of the country, was clear in the time of Elizabeth. After the inassacre of St. • Barthckftw, ieveral who had escaped die Mame b°ok /Asp in Eegland, whoni the Nana Artsbns sador demanded to be given up. The anuses* of Lord I .l3 arleiph was, that the Q ueen had . a right to receive what foreigners she plea s ed into the country, and to send them away if they behaved amiss. The answer had not been that these foreigners had a right to come if they chose; and this case plainly sheaved the opi nion of Lord Burleigh, as to the existence of this power in the Crown. The undoubted power of the Crown over its own subjects would be wholly nuga tory, if a similar power did not erist in the Cabe Of fo reigners. Mr. Justice Blackstone, the Lord Chan cellor, Lord Rosslyn, and the late Marquis. oftsalls down, had all held the same opinion as the individual who then addressed the House. The test for sending an alien out of the country was, whether his conduct had been prejudicial to this country ? If five or six individuals had a right to live here,' then the same right belonged to the State of which they were sub jects. The monstrous consequences which would flow from such a proposition it was needless to point out. The power of the executive was only confirmed, and not created, by the present Bill ; and wac, in fact, considerably mitigated by it ; neither had any appeal ever been permitted from this power of the Crown. He gave his vote most cordially for the Bill. Mr. DENMAN said, he felt it very difficult to ad- 1 dress the House after the two Hon. Gentlemen who had last addressed them. His lion. Friend the Mem ber for Rochester had exhausted the arguments against the Bill; and his Hon. and Learned Friend who had just sat down had, by his ingenuity and repetitions of legal inferences, exhausted the attention of the House. He was not sanguine in his hopes of success in resist ing the Bill at this time, but he hoped when the eco nomical reJuctions which would be necessary should come under consideration next year, that the discus sions upon this subject would be reverted to, and the establishments under this Act abolished. His Hon. and Learned Friend's feelings were with the oppo nents of the Bill. They did him more credit than all his ingenuity and diligence, both as an English gen tleman and as an English lawyer-Wear, hear).—The mode of argument adopted by his Hon. and Learned Friend was not immaterial, though far from deciding the question. But it was not immaterial to ascertain whether the poweigiven by this Bill had always existed, and was now modified, or whether it had been intro duced within the last thirty years: tut it was rather a question of curious and antiquarian research, and could not afford sufficient ground for this Bill. His Hon. and Learned Friend had admitted that no his torian, lawyer, or compiler, had stated this preroga tive as part of the law. His candour had extorted this admission in the midst of his zeal. This was itself demonstration against the existence of such a prerogative. His Hon. and Learned Friend had con tended that it was the same with the writ ne mat regno. This he (Mr. Denman) was prepared to deny. Here he begged to say, that his Learned Friend the Member for Peterborough (Mr. Scarktt), and his Learned Friend the MemberforLincoln (Mr. Williams), had argued not so much against the prerogative itself, as against the prudence of its exercise. Was there one abridgment of the law in which the writ of ne exeat regno was not to be found ?—(Hear, hear). — A negative was not surely to be proved by them who denied the existence of the power to send Aliens out of the country. One of the most important books of authority in the law, Chief Justice Comyn's Digest, contained the head of restraining natives from going abroad, and compelling their return—ne exeat regno and revertatur—but not one mention of any power to send Aliens away.—(Hear,hear).—Bacon's Abridg ment enumerated the 6 4 disadvantages of Aliens," but never mentioned among them that they were expellable at the caprice—ex arbitrio—(Cheers.)— If his Hon. Friend, the Member for Westminster, represented Sir W. Blackstone to be a blunderer, his Hon. and Learned Friend represented Lord Coke to be a blunderer. So there was one blunderer set off against another. It was not the statements or opi nions of political judges on the Woolsack, but their solemn decisions in Courts of Justice, which could have authority en this question—(Hear).—Aliens might have property in this country. Could they be sent away from their legal property? The dis tinction between an Alien friend and an Alien enemy ought never to be forgotten. An Alien friend might at once become an enemy, and when hostilities were likely to break out, nothing could be more fit than to warn Alien friends to leave the realm. The house of an Alien merchant fell to the King : was the King I invested with the power to send away one whose pro perty would fall to himself? The Right Hon. Gen tleman (Mr. Wynn) was not present, who had unan swerably answered the argument respecting this sovereign power being in the Crown. Another Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Canning), to hear whom on any subject was the greatest intellectual delight, but whose eloquence exerted in the cause of the stranger and friendless would indeed be gratifying, was also absent. From the abser.ce of those Right Hon. Gen tlemen he augured the fate of this Bill.—(Hoar, hear). Mr. Fox had denied the prerogative when the horror of French principles supplied a case which was now entirely wanting. Mr. Pitt never asserted it. Mr. Burke said it could be justified only by extreme ne cessity. Neither the Act before the breaking out of the war, nor any of the continuing Acts, alleged the existence of the prerogative. War ought not to be directed against families, but against Governments. In the case of Calvin it had been expressly laid down, that any subject in league with England might come into her realms without license. This was the dictum of Lord Coke. Surely, then, if a man might come into the realm without license, he might remain in it without license. The Proclamations which the sup porters of the Bill relied upon were treated by Lord Coke as contrary to law. He (Mr. Denman) said that the right of aliens to come into the country did not rest upon the provisions of Magna Charta, it rested upon the common law of the laud. The clause in Magna Charta certainly strengthened the right, because it distinctly gave it to aliens who were " mer chants;' but who was to say of au alien standing in England, whether he was a merchant or not? And, besides, the present Bill was-contrary to Magna Charta, for it made no provision for the. safety of " merchants" any mote than for that of other persons. He was astonished to hear the measure at:empted to be justified, by comparing it whh the power of a writ of ne mat .regno. The two powers had not the most distant analogy to each other. And Gentlemen talked of the impossibility of supposing any abuse in the 4. . tow.- r- ereise of the pasts. in which its *nporatib e chievous. For instance, whether any man was an tion might be extremely a Court of Law, and dual was to determine t, at more likely than this Alien Law to embroil. us with foreign nations. Suppose the law to be enforced ,against an American, and America to retaliate upon 'her resident British subjects. And how was the Bill .to be kept i n operation? By a system of surveillance, of espoile, over 24,000 men. The impression upon foreigners minds as to the measure, might be seen from what had taken place in the late Queen's case, with, respect to Marietti. Many persons, aliens, had requested not to be brought forward as witnesses on her Majesty's behalf; from an apprehen§ion lest their evidence should cause the Act to be enforced against them. In the case of alien jurors, the effect of the Bill would be still more dangerous. He really thought that its existence ,would (in any cause where Government was prosecuting) give a legal ground of challenge to the defendant—(Hear). —The Hon. and Learned Gentleman concluded by asking what was the necessity for the Bill ? Arbitrary power might always be asked for as desirable ; but it was not because it was convenient that it therefore ought to be granted. He saw nothing to apprehend from what had been called the ruining of empires.— That we had lost America would not now be consi dered as absolute ruin. That South America was se parated from Old Spain, was not an event pregnant with very dangerous consequences. From the downfal of the Bastile, and of the Inquisition, and of the prin ciples which had supported those establishments, he augured nothing but advantage to the world : be should vote against the present measure, because he thought it most injurious both to the honour and to the interests of England. Sir.ROBERT WILSON strongly opposed the Bill. It had been called a measure of reprisal ; but he knew of no country in which there was a law like the pre sent. In France a stranger was allowed got only to demand an asylum, but to purchase landed property; and in the new Spanish Constitution, the safety of foreigners was expressly declared inviolable. It had been triumphantly said, that the power given by the Bill had not been abused; but he contended that it had been grossly abused in the cases of General Gourgaud and the Countess Montholon. He under stood, too, though it was not a case under the present Bill, that the Governor of St. Helena bad refused to allow a plate to be put on the coffin of Napoleon, giving merely his name and the dates of his birth and death ; and yet the Noble Lord opposite had proposed at Chatillon to acknowledge that celebrated man as, Emperor of France—(Hear, hear).—AlthOugh he had no doubt that the House would past the Bill, he would oppose it to the last moment of its passage through the House. Colonel STANHOPE spoke in favour of the Bill. He believed there was a power in France similar to the present, whatever it might be called; and he be lieved the Hon. Member for Southwark was himself sent out of France in the exercise of it. He did not think the present Bill was good in itself; but, under present circumstances, he considered it better to pass it, to avoid great difficulties. Sir R. WILSON said, it was perfectly true he had been sent out of France: he had been sent out by the same power that violated the Treaty of Paris (Hear). Mr. SCA RLETT said he should always, as a law yer, deny the prerogative which had been contended for by the supporters of the Bill. The cases which had been referred to respecting the Writ of ne exeat regno, were cases of Clergymen, who, before the Reformation, were forbidden by statute to quit the kingdom. In modern times the Writ was used solely for the advancement of justice between party and party. Upon the question of the general policy of the measure, he should only say that nothing had been said to satisfy him of the propriety of giving unlimited power to a Secretary of State. Responsi bility had been talked of; but there was never any l responsibility without publicity ; and a Secretary of State would be a perfect dolt, who were so to act under the Bill as to expose himself to responsibility.! He was bound to say, that he did not believe it was intended to abuse the Bill; but he looked with jea lousy to every demand by a Minister of increase to his power. Mr. I.OOKHART, amid cries of question, opposed the Bill. Mr. PEEL, in explanation, observed, that it had been said the Abbe Buonavista was harshly treated, but it would appear that indulgence had been extended towards him. When the Abbe arrived in this country, and found that he could not be permitted to remain, he expressed a wish to be sent to Rotter dam. On the 11th of May, the Inspector of Gravesend re ported, that the Abbe Buonavista, in consequence of ill health, required more than ordinary indulgence. The twit day Lord Sid.nouth directed that every indulgence should be afforded to the Abbe, who was sent by his own wish to Rotterdam. It Was there fore clear that he was not treated with unnecessary. severity. Sir R. WILSON said that the explanation bad not met the charge which be had made against Lord Sidmouth. He had charged him with having used unnecessary severity against this aged man—he was upwards of 70—hy net allowing him to land. He wished to go to the Mediterranean, but was refused. This he had under the Abbe's own hand; and he was told that he must go to Rotterdam or to Hamburg!), and he chose the former as being nearer the place to which he ultimately intended to pro ceed. This, he would say, was treating hint with the severity of a malefactor—(Hear). • Mr. PEEL said that, in tracing the correspondence on this subject, it appeared the Abbe himself had applied for leave to go to Rotterdam. Sir ROBERT WILSON said, he had the Abbe's ktterin his hand, and offered it to the Right Hon. Secretary to read.— Sir Robert handed the letter over the table to Mr. Peel for his perusal.—The House then divided— For the third reading of the Bill Against it - - 7S - 32 Majority for the third reading • .-45 On the re-admission of strangers to the gallery, Mr. !Immense was on his legs, opposing the Bill in the last stage. He moved, as an Amendment, to leave out the title of the Bill, for the pur pose of inserting the following title —" A Bill to repeal an much of the Great Charter and other Statutes as relates to the free In gress and residence of foreign merchants in these islands; and to assimilate the Government to foreign despotic Governments."— (Several Members exclaimed, " N.! no !—withdraw !") Mr. PEEL said, the Honourable Member, after all, bad pro posed an incorrect title, inasmuch as he did not state'that the Bill was to renew an Act which passed two years ago.—A :don ensued on the Amendment : For the Title of the Bill - 49 For the Amendment - £0 Majority against the Amendment 9 The Bill was accordingly passed, and ordered to the- Lords. IRISH ESTIMATZS. GOULBUB.K gum notice, that on Monday nest hi should move the remainder of the Irish Estimates. The other Orders of the Day were disposed of, and the House adjourned r Twelve o'Clock Monday . f - c. Weetwo...- 5 Won by a length.--A good rece.-5 to 2on Theodore. The Filly Stakes of 25p. each, 10gs. ft. for 3-yr-olda, list. each. Mr. Mason's ch. by Le o p o ld 1 Colonel Croft's eh. f. by Co MIX Dodsworth's b. by Wend - - - 3 Won by half a neck.-3 to 1 apt eh. by Leopold -7 to 2 I va ch. f. by Comus-6 to S apt b. by WJfr'. A Sweepstakes of 50g.. each, h. ft. fur 3-yr-olds, oohs, sit. Sib. Bst.—Newcastle Turn-in. Mr. Milne's h. f. by Comus Lord Queensberry's b. c. Orat or 6 to 5 on Orator.—Won cleverly. Third Year of the renewal of the Gosforth,Stakes of lop., each, with 20gs. added, for horses, Ste. of all ages, 3-yr-olds, Tat. 4-yr-olds, Bit. 31b. 5-yr-olds and upwards, Bst. 101 b. Mr. Larobton's gr. h. Dundinane, 5 yrs old - - - 1 Mr. T. O. Powlett's b. h. Gambler, 5 yrs old - - Lord Queensberry's ch. c. Ledstone, 4 yrs old - - 5 5 to 4 on I)unsinane.—Easy. His Majesty's Plate of 100 gs. 4-yr-olds, 10st. 41b. 5-yr-olds. l 1 st. Gib. 6-yr-olds, 12st. and aged, 12st. 25 ) .—F ou r m il es . Mr. I.ambto n ' s b. c . Ricfiard, 4 yrs old - - 1 Mr. Armstrong's b. c. Packman, 4 yrs old - - 2 Lord Scarborough's br. e. Byram, 4 yrs old - - - 3 Mr. Hutchinson's b. c. Lord of the Manor, 4 yrs old - 4 Packman the favourite.—Very easy. Saturday, at Tynemouth, a man undertook to run 22 miles in three hours, on half a mile of ground between the Castle gates and the Barracks. After doing 18 miles in two hours and a quarter, he gave in, owing to spraining his suck. • 1 2 CHELTENHAM RACES, THURSDAY, JULY 18. Sweepstakes of 15gs. each, for 2.yr-olds, colts, sst a 71b. fillies , - Sst. Course.-Untried stallions and mares allowed 31b. hut only one allowance made.-Five Subscribers. Mr. C. Day's eh. e. Ontario - - - - 1 Mr. West's ch. e. by Rubens Lord Warwick's b. c. by Phantom - - - 3 The Hunters' Sweepstakes of 15gs. each, .sgs. ft. for, home that have been regularly hunted with any established pack of fox hounds in England, 5-yr-olds, list. 61b. 6-yr-olds and aged, llst.-Cup Course.-Mares and geldings allowed :51b. half bred horses 71b.-Rode by Gentlemen.-21 Subscribers. Mr. J. Walters's b. m. Rebecca, aged - - - - 1 Mr. D. Faulkner's b. h. Blisden, 5 yrs old - - - . 2 Mr. Armitage's Swindon, 6 yrs old - - - - 5 The Town I'late of 50 Sovereigns, for horses of all ages, 2.yr olds, a feather; 3-yr-olds, 7st. 4.yr-olds, B,t. III). 5-yr-olds, Sst. 91b. 6-yr-olds, Bst. 131 h. and aged, 9st. ilb.-Mares and geldings allowed 31b.-Two-tulle heats. Major O'Gore'si the Duke, 5 yrs old - - Major O'Gore's Cuyp, 4 yrs old - - TILIDAT. Sweepstakes of 100 gs. each, h. ft. for 3-yr-olds, colts, est. 71b. fillies, Rat. 31b.-One mile and a quarter. Mr. R. F. Benson's br. e. by Thunderbolt - - - I Mr. L. Charlton's b. e. by Orville - 2 Mr. Myttoo's Vade Mecum - - - - 3 The Berkeley Uunt Stakes.-Ten Subscribers. Mr. J. Walters's hl. m. Rebecca, aged-Walked over. The Cheltenham Gold Cup, or Piece of Plate, value 100 gs. in addition to a Subscription of 20gs. each, h.ft. 3-yr-olds, 6st. 41b. 4-yr-olds, Bst. 5-yr-olds, sst. l ilb. 6-yr-olds, 9st. 21b. and aged, 9st. 41b..-Cup Course. Mr. Charlton's Master Henry, aged - - - . Lord Ailelbury's b. b. Savernake, 5 yrs old - - - I A Forced Handicap Sweepstakes of 10gs. each, with 25gs. add from the Fund.-Two-mile heats. Mr. Canning's Gleaner, 7st 41b. - - - . Mr. Pryse's Dr. Eady, 6 yrs old, Sit. 41b. - - MARLOW RACES, THURSDAY, JOLT 19. His Grace the Duke of Buckingham's Gift of a Cup, value 50gs. for horses belonging to the Non-commisioaed Officers and Privates of • the Bucks Yeomanry Cavalry, for the improve ment of speed. Mr. W. Hook's b. h. Saddlebags - Mr. R. Boncey's ch. m. Calypso Mr. G. Gould's b. h. Waterloo Screw 1 1 I 1 1 1 2 2 Thomas Brown, a private in the Royal Artillery, was yester day brought up before S. B. ALLIN, Esq. at Union Hall, charged [ with having robbed Mr. Job Watkins, lanaird of the Globe wine -vaults, in the Borough-road. The complainant stated, that the prisoner lodged in his house. Several articles of pro perty had been missed by the witness and his wife, out of dif ferent rooms in the house, into which no persons had access but the servants. The prisoner was always at home at season able hours, but from the circumstance of ,his being the only lodger, he was suspected, and his guilt fully confirmed on Thurs day night. Watkins said, that after he and his family had retired to rest, a noise was heard below stairs, when he immediately ran down, and saw the prisoner on the landing-place on the first Boor, with a lighted candle in his hand. He was in the act of uollcking the back room, and had no clothes on but bis shirt.— The witness sent off for a constable, who proceeded to search the rdbm in which the prisoner lodged. Between the bed and mattress were found five keys, a pair of stockings, gold ear rings, &c. Upon examination it was ascertained that the keys found opened most of the doors in the house, and the witness had no doubt but the pelsoner was in the constant habit of getting up after the family retired to bed, and robbing the rooms of whatever articles he could lay his hands upon. Shergold, the constable, corroborated the latter part of this statement, and added, that on searching the prisoner he found his furlough, signed by the Adjutant of the Regiment, and it had been renewed four times. Mr. Watkins identified some of the articles, as also did one of his servants a pair of ear-rings. The Magistrate said * that he lamented to see a soldier belonging to so highly • re spectable Corps charged with such an offtnce, and felt it his duty to commit him for trial. Yesterday Peter Jennings, the brickliyet's labourer, accused of the murder of the boy, Francis Whitby, by throwing him from a scaffold (as stated in the STAR), was brought up to Bow-street Office for a second examination. Hull, the Constable, informed Sir Ricuann Diannt, that a Coroner's Inquisition bad been assembled, and, after a long in vestigation, had returned a verdict—" That the deceased died in consequence of having fallen from a scaffold."—He handed a certificate of the verdict, signed by Mr. Gut, the Coroner, to Sir RICHARD. The Foreman of the Works at which the deceased and the prisoner were employed, was called in, and deposed, that the deceased and the prisoner were not seen on the scaffold toge ther, but the latter was observed to be standing there in less than a minute from the time when the boy was last seen.— No working tool fell with the boy, nor was there anything on the scaffold which he could have tripped over. Witness hail most minutely examined the place, and '..!e spoke without the least doubt when he said that the boy could nut by any possibi lity have fallen by accident to the spot where he was found. A simple fall would have brought him between two walls under neath, instead of which, he was several feet beyond those walls. Sir RICHARD BERNIE telt considerable reluctance, on the score of delicacy, in taking up a case upon which a Coroner's Jury had already given a verdict; but still there was something so very mysterious in the transaction, and, in his opinion, such strong presumptive evidence, that the inquiry ought not to be given up while there was even a distant chalice of arriving at the truth; and he therefore should certainly not discharge the prisoner at present.—He was again remanded. While the examination was going on, the father of the de ceased buy, a poor labouring man, presented h mself to the Ma gistrate, and wished to know if any, and what further steps could be taken ? He felt thoroughly convinced that his son. had not come fairly by his death, and he was flat at all satisfied with the decision of the Jury. Could not a fresh Jury be summoned? Sir RICIIAILD Waste sai4, he was not certain as to whether the Coroner possessed that power or not ; but if be did, he (Sir R. Biania) could see no possible objection to such a step. Sir Blowup then wrote shortly his own opit ian of the matter upon the margin of the Coroner's certificate, and desired the father to take it to Mr. Geld. The poor old man; the tears tackling down his toil-worn cheeks, begged to know if he might bury his son's remains oft bergy day he oi e sonic demur had been made at the . could .pare tq attend his fn siitierainda?y,Haes a it sk w ed as th th iz only Hospital to the giving tip the bony pending an ievestigatioe. Sir Itscnitaa ihaNts said, that if another Jury were stn. mooed, it would be before Sunday, and the father might certainly -t star • ' . C ' i i „ - ' lit'i ... • mac' 4 _ ..• . altelbilbit . - ~" 4 " . " ‘ *to"' ' ': _4"': • ' - . , ma, ' i d . Whir, there - were eases npc ettes • The x NyEzw or c sr A rtitVdtY.V t ij ussimy G r Zr uc : oicsii:est. 36. )n Melt naeasiatily be eat IMP staire lle of gsr. each, for 3. ante, hOw was it to be dot Wed as an alien or not ? finch a roes- fillie'srew.—Two util e& nely difficult of sol ! tion even in H on . M r . Petro : b. e.. Theodor e d yet the word of a singe indtvi- rl r r . . Riddle's gr 's . b c . . e W b e e t y 11 : 00 d _ n C°lsacll : : - - g - - 3 ne it. No law could be enacted ljouraed at Twelve e'Clock to Monday. I bury Ida sou ea that day.