Star. — London, England, 1817-11-27 00:00:00

m - rEadziick. CI - UNCUT,. NOVEMBER 9E. .. Court to-day was totally tin rsairnpi Petitions were heard, respecting some demUrrers. Hi Liar on Friday he would dispose v. Gordon, having read all 's put in by both partits,,be been sent from Scotland. '.TX HEARING. actu i toa further intimated, that hr is latterly filed in the case of and would dispose of it to.mnr. the same time, give his judg- Colebrook v. Lee, as he under 'fas intended to be addressed -to for Counsel, lie would be very attend him in his private room came into Court. He bad he intended to have given tt,i, had been so mush occopivo night, that he bad not bad au a single paper. tS. agiinst mbrringe. arbitration. 'teJ ; but who dr imitges to :w cause decision. The .-. was held. Arcision, the' yeL the ig to this bad been 'aster 4VJS id's pro. trndant's ipd then to rf dis t frlll.~in amounc- nuking the ♦'flue :!ssed ut, .e owed. lie. los* to lose Why against The thdt there 'aged its already attempt Ible cum :ket As fu the prict, exorbitant • to that 'at thew laths, to their oil to 4414 te . tk .l s e: esuipoiti that they declared to ' price of price, to ,! in con• shall pre. on which obser ye, the cast prosectt: unlaiely, Aim) was virtual ' anti therefore, v. Lord ?as trie.., used in is Lord: tether thry would ap- the case rhich was Lordship,' motion is Cleasby mentioned " ' en, had oil in the double deponent to join Iny oil in tioning a :onent uh. Is it thei) that it it prevented out a •ery that it they had get, they there he could: it would' any case, an in iobe :no trying to raad Al- the Rule of the ty called id it to victual the Rai- Ittacts in pArisher. their coo. which though of oil in for them snarly . . . . stow 6 4 .111 it iris Miele Altii MinkWM . LAM, Act destrille at lithe')' not only tr,i bristithelti eft hut aliu great injury to die pisblii." Lied Et.t.ibteoieutril'ef- in Ole cisi 'di • the . ki-g Waddington; was rust the oetendant tried on Arm VIA term , chitges? Wit kit ohe of thorn a eltellab lit fitrehalsd Logaias."' . . Mr. Scateett7--ii My Lore, it Wi's sd. Tha 6rik cltsrge wee tiled before Alt. Juetice. I. t Btsnc, at W teener; end the second, which was a fonrkand as tried It Einildhall, b.. Fore L rd Ken. *vete where; after a full discussiun; the defendant was sentenced e• three months imprist.nment end to fine of resoo. •He also received a sentence on the first charge." Lord Eteexeuttetren— This Cleasby is a Maki r?'; Mr. Stint-Err—'4 Yes, my Lord; but in the pie. sent case be is a ~arty. Your Lotdslup a ill Plead that this is & conspiracy to monepolief this &nick in nrdef to raise it be their own price. Cle ire ill his hat • service.* with these patties whom he ..relied to WI! any dealibg with, uses she word we. Mr. Justice BAYLEY-4' Cleasby and Hilbefi *ete not general ' , miners." Mr. SCAitLlerlr.-.-" No, my mod; they weft hot sentral partners; but your Lordships will perceive; that in his own sternent, as it is swor n i n nn e of the . affidavits, Cle a s by says;i—. Hilvers and I must inc: ceid in getting our own price for the '—l have' further to obserVe to your Lordships, that not ably .the. price of while oil *at affected by this iimisaefronl . •bur. Jut avan.ptlthrd oil.. is bich was usually r...rd at about A 1.5 per tu n, has risen since to 140. now to can your Lordships' attention to another affi: .davit. Sense lithe ago, the persons into rested In the at trade, halting got toms itsformation of ashes *as king forward, sent a person, pa rried litsight, down to Hull, to make inquiries. The affidavit or Knight states, that, on his arrivalin Hull, Ito sea: informed, and verily believ‘s, that Cleasby and /Myers had there endeavoured td prevent the holders if nil Iron klling it under a certain price ; that he hod sten a contract to' this'effect .whicts Either: had entered into with several persons in Hull. Deponent further states, that he v:as hummed, and verily believes it td . be tine, ilea Myers went from London to Hull for the above purpose, and that nit his anis*, there lie . called a meeting of the principal persons cnticerhed in the whale-nil trade. At this meeting, he, Hitters,. informed theme 'that they ought not to sell their oil at a low price, fur ht would soon bear a b e tte r , and hi proposed a gentr •I contract, by which he *wird' bind himself to take half of the new whale uil then ill their possession at .€39 per tun, the market price being then only te . :55. He sic bound himself not to, sell any oil betere i the first of the December then en suing et less than 4E:O per tun, provided they• .ould. on their part,' agree nut tq sell any oil eithin the' 'same period at less than tel.s per tun, be engaging, that it they dad not succeed in selling it at that price • he mould take the whole of what should remain ti.eir hands at et; p.:r tun. I have also, my Lord', • tee affiJevit of a person of the name of Jones, which • states, this in the month Of July last, the trade in whale oil was very dull, but that it had since risen very suddenly to £6O person. The affidavit glib states, that in the autumn of the present year Mew ?. Hilvers had entered into contracts et Hull, acid other ; • es, to raise the price of oil, and riot deponent. • and &bailee *aut.. mit tbity:' and. Havers, had got nearly 800 tuns te oil in there possession that they had raised it to £6O per, mos and would raise it ues6 - 70." * Lord Eeereeortoucti—" Is there any proof safg lisivvs had gone tti any other port besides Hull 'AC' the same purpose ?" Ida. biYeet.m . — ! " I believe, my Lied, we bee* • no tlireceproot tharise had." Lord Ei,etebottoutrie—" Did he attempt to hare true only use userket at Hull, or did he make any such attempt at'any other place, or did he attempt es ibitilenCe the n.arket generally.?' . . Mr. Stutitt.lat— a My LUrd, out affidavit s' only .state, that . he acted at London ant Hull," Lord ELLIVIP)ROUGII—" To wffat port . does the South Sea dirge ?" Ibleeffeelturre—" I b.ebeve, my Lord, to Lond.di and Hull principally." Mr. Justice Ileeeste—"' I believe it wilt be foand Oat Wbitby is also a principal placi. &Me ate t, is is true, may go to other places." ' Mr. ticAhLErc:—" lam not, My Lord,• prepared to say to what places the oil may go, eirt 1 humbly submit in your Lordships, that from what hesTbeen stated in the affidavits there can be no doubt that the object of these persons was to itifluence the market generally. Indeed, in this they succeeded but tpo well, for it appears from the affidavits of thecontrac tors Per lighting several parishes, that they had.made their contracts this year a little above the market price, in tuckr to allow themselves a fair profit.—• They contracted at the rate of About .£4O per tune . but now the price is over £6O, and if whit Cleasby has declared, shall prove to :se true, it will soon be 470. These persons well know, my Lords, that the oil must be purchased from them in the waster,. they, sheretore, with such command over it, thut may raise it- to any price they please. The come., salience of this will be, that the conuactors must be reined, or that the streets of the metropolis . shall be very badly lighted, or perhaps notlighted at all for . . some time." 'Lord Eeeitkannoural—‘i Will not the gas rednce the price of oil ? That ought to be supposed to have agond effect ih lowering the price of oil." Mr. Sicenterr—e. One should bare hoped soy my 'Lords; but hem what I know oa the subject, I rather apprehend that the gas is somewhat dearer than oil." Lord EtLesnottoucm—" Was there not once an application made to the Court on an occasion of the monopoly of alum ?" Mr. Scnattarr—" I do not reoollect any such case, my Lbrd." Lord ELLansonouou—el What is stated to be the whole amount of the tut thus purchased P' Mr. Scau.rux." My Lord, that does not exactly appear, but.one of the affidavns bus te 6, that Cleasby had declared, he and Hilvers had got nine-tenths of 'hat oil was in the country, and that he. Cleasby, added, with an oath, that aU else Mcychaats in Lou dun should be- obliged to come ,to purchase from them, and that they would not under, sr7()titr tun. It is also stated, that on one occasion a leper was sent 'by directjon ol.Cleasby and Hilcers tt't . perva who Lad contracted to sell them some oil, aud ; - - - - . . • - • • ,RMDIZYL FIRZ AT KIDDIRMiNSTER " tkik: cok. . • •, • ' COURT OF COMMON .PLEAS, IRELAND . , NOV. 10 — .. ' ' 1. err • tivrithitdriick ' • ......„ VON A CORRESPONDENT AT niILES-Olanti.) , ‘. BROWN v. BLAKE. __._ COURT OF CHANCERTi.NOVEifiIIEtt i The e xtensive carpet manufactory , at Kidder- eor..GOOLD, On th e p . m of the plaintiff, mov e d to The business of the Cou r t to -d a y was tpti ssi i,, aelanging to Messrs. Hooman and Co. was set aside the verdi c t o b ta i ne d b y the defendant in this , interesting. &vete! &aim/A Petitions were • cause, and that the issue in this cause tray be reCOn- and directions given respecting some demUrre d a l- m i•ttin.: (Sunday) completely destroyed uttered by another Jury , inasmuch as said verdict was Lordship intimated, that on Friday he would stet : fi te , su pposed to be the work of some incendiaries, contrary to law and ev idence, and to the charge of of the case of Gordon v. Gordon, bailing n ro `a re especially as the people employed there the Learned Judge ; and in asmuch in the evidence the affidavits and papers put in by both parti a s truck some time in the week , in consequence of given by the d e f e nd ant , impeaching and defaming sides those whi c h h a d b een sent f rom S cot l and r efusal ;,6 advance their wages. The premises sod- die charact er o f t h e plaintiff, was given by surprize, and not relevant to the issue ; and which the said The' PRIVATE /MARINO. LORI, CUANCID,LoR further intimated, tiro Iv b - forth into a blaze, about hall past eleven . . plaintiff would have been prepared to refute, i f be had read the a ffi davits latterly fi led in the i t ook in the mouling, during the time of DivineProcter e . . ?racier, and would dispose of it I had been apprized thereof ' ; and also, inasmuch as tic:, and when there was hardly a person to be one of the plaintiff's most material witnesses, although raw. He would, at th ee same time, give hoc is :!!e meets. On the alarm being given, the duly served with a subpcetia to attend and give evi- went in the case of Colbrook si. Lee, as he tole of the congregation, together with the Clergy. dence in this cause, did not attend thereon, through stood nothing 'more was intended to be addle immediately rushed forth to assist in reducing the interference a nd p rocurement o f t h e d e f endant. tam. It conv en i ent for Counsel, lie would h in. Lord Noneuttz—a With regard to my c h arge , I glad if they wuultt attend him in his privati , a ta ,,, i , which, in so short a space of time , hadtonnorrow, before he came into Court. I- do most solemnly s ay, I did not ch ar ge either for hin t to an alarming height, in conseq u e nce o f the plaintiff or defendant; on the contrary, I told the o th er j ud g m ent s which he intended to have gin eit 4.lain6tY of oil on the premises necessary in the Jury that it was entirely a Jury q uest i on ; and that 1 morning. but his time had been so much a saiticiuring the w o ol, Sa c.. la m extremely sorry would not be dissatisfied a t an y ver di ct t h ey gave i n ." by .public motets laic night, that he h a d n o t Mr. GOoLD here read the material parts. He said opeortunity of reading a single paper. a jd, that the Clergy Man, in . his raise-worth el. although the defendant had been duly served with a' .. COURT OF KING' , BENCH, NOVEMBF.t ' :,, h a d one of his fingers d islocated, which, aft e r copy of t h is affidavit, he has not answered it • •" nt • to this Emma? v. MAsOU. us ing it to be replaced by a medical man, he re. hour. The scope of the case wu this ;it was an ac- This was an action by the plaintiff, a Lady, v e d the inhabitants, with his arm in a sling, and don brought by the plaintiff aeainst the defendant, the defendant, for a breach' of promise of mt via renewed his assistance. The engines .of the Mr. Blake, for criminal conversation with his (the The ease was agreed to be referred to arbi plaintiff's) Wile. After the plaintiff bad examin e d ' Fwd . arbitrators were accottingly appoi nte an were speedily brought into action, and the pre • h closed is witness and his case, the first witness exa • they not agreeiiig, an umpire was called in, I, i wt b e ing adjoining the Canal, water fortunately mined for the defendant was the Hon. Barryeing. .t:ded between them as to the amount of dam , u ij bi procuied in abandanCe. The falsifies also , ham ; lie was produced, not to throw any dosbt on be riven to the plaintiff. • •• • • - - ' ' ra D; avd:ey, one from Stourport, and abother from the fact of the defendant having defiled the plaintiff's .: Mr. RAYNE now apalied for a rifleao she, n:bridge, arrived with all possible expedition ; wife, but he went on th e ta bl e to d epose to a certa i n Wirth* umpire s h oul d not rev i se hi s d ec i s i on • conversation that took place between him and the case arose in Yorkshire, where the arbitration w withainding which it was a very considerable plaintiffand I ; t m.particular words, said the Learned Previous to the umpire coming to his Amin c b.fere the flames could tit got under, and bad 'Counsel,. I consider too frightfully indecent to repeat lady said she would be content with *100; the greatest exertions Leon made use of, or had in a Court of Justice : but these words, it actually umpire awarded her 1650 ; and in coming acci,L:iit unfortunately happened during the spoken by the plaintiff , abroad only go in mitigati o n decision, he treated the case as if the lady hi ' of damages, and could not defeat the pjaintiff's right the widow of the defendant, and in that eharac ' It, a great part of the town must inevitably have of action. It - was sworn by this witness that this to receive her share ot the deceased Motu's' destroyed. There can be but little -013- el r.t of f Conversation took place in presence of she defendant's , party. He first took an account of the defe h av i ng been wilfully done, as the foreman had brother ; yet they did not venture to produclthis gen- I treeliold, leasehold, and myna' property, al . ro und the premises about ten o'clock, when Oman on the trial t the plaintiffnowasweati that he is j gate. the plaintiff one third, under the statute credibly informed, that t h e d e f en d ant ' s b rot h er d oes ' trination. He then g a v e h er a th ir d o f w h at i thing was safe. I have further to, add, that not even assert a recollection of say such circum ed, under the custom of York, the two sums a workmen in the town in this employ, were in a stance or conversation, and he is willing to abide ins together to the total of L 650 ; and in I of torment, in consequence of the demand for the event by thi testimony of this very man. What- I shut award, he Only took into consideration th increase of wanes not being acceded to, which is ever, said Mr. Goold, may be the ultimate tate 'of i °I. the property wh ic h' t he d e f en d ant was pass! • I feat, as yet allayed. A party of dragoons die caul. ;a-whether the doors or Justice will be Iw' hout making any deduction for t h e debts hi doted finally and for ever against my unhappy client,' he Com t grunted the Rule to skew cause. K just parsed through here from Birmingham or whe t h er his wrongs shall meet with redress. lam :# NOVEMBER .i.V.,.—Tile on. M',l. l oroLY.• o'clock) on their way to Kidderminster which g lad this • , an snlavoutiable aspect. record his strong and positive con:radiction to a fst a your Lords_aps fora Rule to slieWeau I understand that not less than 1.50 men, besides charge, which, it true, would not merely cover the a enininal infoiraaiion should not be filed - 1 ennui and children, hale, by this destructive party with infamy, but would amount to a national Herman Gerard advers and Stephen Cleasb: disgrace. He swears, that it is utterly and entirely grounds un which I mave'tor this. rule are, th gration, been thrown out of employ. The de- t i h a se; . swears that he never in public or private,ti. persons have, fur some time past, been cogs is estimated at from twelve to fifteen thousand they t o M r. Bing ham , ads—ten of which, I understand, are insured. expression stated and 'Worn to by that gentleman.— nattered severely by the law. That is, an a -- -. He states that Mr. Bingham having beets called was to enhance the value of a certain merchantab. Tuesday morning last, at seven o'clock, a fire was a surprise; and that had he been apprised that Mr.. inudity, and so to influence the general mark, • red in St. Stephen's 'Chinch, in Exeter : Bingham would have been produced as a witneu, be give to themselves the entire comicial over th , e doors being instantly burst "Pens the front of the would have been prepared to prove circumstances which it was their object to raise to an eat lery was found to be in garnet, but by the most that Would disentitle his testimony to credit. Antither tight. I shall, my Lords, fromarritavits ire exertions h was in a short time extinguithOdo fact, my Lords, continued Mr. Gould, of extreme an. e 1, which I hotel in my hand, Omit , the was a most humpy circumstance that it, was $o Portance, as nitrating on the evidence of Mr. Bing. Gentlemen endeavoured, for nearly tliree ma ly observed„fee bad it continued unnoticed a ham, is stated in Mr. Brown's affidairit; and on which Preadiii on several moms either to sea then tine liner, the dm 'giving element must hale be relies, it is thus : -He seiwtt hat 'Mr. Biala* .ilme, ur not to I lk, tp T eritii • . 1 4,1 7 - li Iyeffifne Oft' f- - ' ' OsbisAfat BE illrettfillWfltwiltailtiti;Wiiiitlisert • pee; ai - id — az - 0, that they dech • • week being so exceedingly dty. The accident he was not then indebted to M. Browne in any sum many individuals, that they would rid the 1 rod from the•choir of singers, who had been peae.. 4 ) 1 nullity ; bat he, Browne, swears that Mr. Bingham oil hruln idr3s, !Mai was then the market p, pg, in the Church the preceding evening, let•ing a was Olen actually indebted to sum in a Sam of , al7o, an which -pi ice it has nearly risen since k from one of ahiveandlea tall don a crevice, /739. 7s. 6d.; and he mien, to an acknowledgment towhee of their exertions. bly Lords, l• A it rested all night, but did not bona into a for th.it sum in his possestion. 'rite next witness ►pro- 1. aoloia read to your Lordships the affidavits so till morning. .1 . , . • ductal far the defendant was , Mr. Thos. Coneys, a' 111* mutton is founded; but, thst. I mast c The account which appeared in most of the Paper, Member of the Bar ; andthe plaintiff 4;ectaiiiiy.speaks ' that this is not a novel ease. 'lt is similar to t ado, stating, that George Chennell, jun. and ot his testimony, and the manner in which he con- ut the King v. Waddiugton, which was a p a'craft (who are charged with the murder of G. dotted himself in the transaction, in terms of strung DOE ageism, the defendant for endeavouring, u bell, syn. the father of the former prisoner, at reprobation. He states that Mr. Coneys assisted in :LO enhance 'We Value of hops. The questi • altuing),'had arrived at Horsemonger-lane Ga , a, preparing the briefs in the attorney's office,.kno.ll4 started on the trial, whether h o ps were a virlisa itt.., reel. that he would be called on as a witness, and actua i it cites contended that they were not, and, iii histtera—Strecinesday_senaight, , in consequence prepared the brief cf is own evidence in the officeof : dies not come within the meaning of thelaw. some opposition given to Jona Mousey, Esq. High. the defendant's attorney ; and iurther, that the evi. Kenyou, However, before- whom the cause wi , itable air the Barony of Tul a, he took out a few denee he .Rase on the, trial was materially contra- i head, mat hops *ere a victual,. as they were e 9fla Regiment, stationed at Scariff, and proceed- dieted by the testimony of s'another of defendant's the making of a drink in general use, but hi, on his levy. lie was soon opposed by a vast mul- witnesses. He swears that the witness it under -the 1 ahip.also added, that it was immaterial whet! I and at length compelled to order the soldiers to immediate influence of the defendant—that he did ; wen a victual or not, as the common law we i ohm three men were killed, and two clang,- not directly or indirectly make use of the expressions ply to tram as a merchantable commodity." Y Wounded. • sworn to by him; and that if his evideace had 'not Lord Etincsoutieon—o 'l'hcte was also i Saadi ie!nnight, a riot took place at a hurling 'been given by surprise, he would have produced Mr. of the Grand Alliance, -as it was called, whi cb at Derreen, near Ennis, when John Quilligeg John D'Arcy, a Gentleman of large fortune, and of an attempt to raise the price of coals." cited so violent* blow on :he bead that he die ern the highest respecialnlity, at viboseloure expressions Mr. SCAULs;TT-1 shall, now call your Los edneolay night. were sworn to by Coneys, to have been uttered by the attention to the affidavits on which this mu `LIDO/WWI II TEE EAsT.—Yesterday being the plaintiff, In have contradicted him. The next wit. 'Minded. The first is from a person to wt o ,an i appointed for the ceremony of laying the first ness was a Mr. Lyons, who took a yery active part for hadaippied. " In this application Cleashy me of a splendid 'Church, which is to be rebuilt the defendant, and his evidence contradicted th e t es . to depioneut, that he (Cleasby) and Mr. Hillic thedirectionei. kilsa,tounti, the architect, about Mutiny of Coneys. The next' witness was a person sueettded an purchasing nine-tenths of the. oil o'clock the Auddshillop Of CANTIREVRY arrived of the name of Tully, a writing doh in the employ- country, and.that they expected to raise it to ll's carriage, and proceeded .so the platform erected Mint of the former attorney and active friend of the its glen price. Hi therefore urgt , d . deponent the Purpose, on the site where the old church stood, defendant ; he was produced tot the purpose of ion- theolan purchasing, or to agree nut to sell an ,d i d by t h e Rev. Mc. liseerr, the Rector, the- ',Wising the evidence of one of the plaintiff's wit his possess:on under a certain price, nienti• rchwardenS, and the. Building Committee, and a nesses, and came on the table dressed up in Clothes ; sum 'much above the market. place. DeFon her of Gentlemen, parishioners ; when, having purchased for him by the 'defendant's friend, Mr. I jetted to this, and obberted, that the price, as iced in the.stone prepared for the purptise a awe. His conduct excited general disgust. I re- stood, was too high for equitation, and th let of the present coin of the realm, and offering collect, said Mr. Goold, Upleasantry that fell from was - raised, tue lower classes a ould be pre an appropriate 5 .... a yer Man AEMIOISTT, imploring your Lordship on the °mishits. hoes' aping it, ewer therefore it might turnout blessing Puha Chards Which , is to be erected for Lord Meitner —I beg, Mr. Goold,• you will• not bad *mutation. 'l'u this iCteasby replied, worship, the stone 'was lowered into its place;— repeat it; it might have been good enough at the they could sell but half of the quantity th the ceremony was concluded by a peal from the time,, bat my stories don't beat repetition. bought, at the price which, they expected to gi spire, which remains, and •to whith the new • MI. Goow—Your Lordship is the only man that mignelet the remainder run into:the sea; and aich is to be built. . thipks so. My Lords, Mr. Browne denies, in the tore, he adeised deponent to purchase what he 1 ReIrt•LANS Tilealtnea—The Benefit which the most unequivocal and most solemn manner, the im. at £57 per tun, tor, -that even at that price, it ieton of this Theatre have liberally * p i j aws t o' proper conchu conversations t•and conversn*. attributed to him ; teaac "Rau i:Gem, pro fi t." Emily of the late Mr. RAMMED, nD, took els* sod with regard to his behaviour towards hit wife, it Lit EllitallOSOUGH--" Can you cite an . hi. A view of the audience was sufficient to have is a remarkable eh:cute:time that all the witnesses Mr. Bcariett, to skew that the Court granted every one, w h o l ta d never b ear d o f his name produced OR the trial More agreed in this, that what. formation where the commodity attempted to e, of the high respect in which Mr. RATMOND ever might have been his follies or improprieties, his nopoiised was not a victual 1 1 have keen no held. Every seat in the House was tell. There affection toward, his wile was mitosis, and his con. recollect the particulars ot the case of the Gm be no brilliant yan the appearance of any an- &deuce in her was unbounded. Udder all the fir- Linn,' but I cannot do so sutSciently." re at present ; but that of last night was esti- •comstances of the ease, be Aid that justice would not , Mt. RAINE..." My Lord, iu that case the 1 Y one in which the Fashionable, bore an unusual, be done it this verdict were allowed to stand, and he was dtscharged." Portion. WALLACE performed the character of hoped the Court would, be pleased to Wawa new trial. tor. BeasuLgrail My Lord, in the case • 40, and was received throughout with conside • Berjeant JoY said he would merely oppose this ap- King e.•Waddington, to which I have already applause. Omani% on the part of the defendant, on the ground your Lordamp's attention, Lord Kenyon held COVENT GARDEN.—Last night. after the Tragedy of irregularity, without entering into the merits of beluga:amlet whether the comm o dity was a 1 hatella. the Farce of leve l "WWI 414 4 PaPlisv was the case. It wa s irregular, bream this was not the orsiot. My Lords, I also hold .in my hand tl setited,in which Mr. Win: leo sustained the elm- time for the patty to make snob an application. It' davits of smaral persona who have made contr sr of Flexiße for the first time. Iu this; as in his the plaintiff was serious in looking for a new trial, he th 4 pretent year to, ht the.stracu of many pa •ler efforts, he displayed a good deal of Ceacity thould have come its before.—The Coon . decided, In th ese It is stated, that-they bad made then bustle. H e sung t h e song of which M bi Arnaera that the application was not irregitlar. . - •.' tracts at a little above the market: price of oil, • to make s o Much, with applause; but 'still we • be ' rjeant Joy' then' said, that he • oval' lot 'nit _asps, w-, then about aftss per tun; but that since, t, Id not help regretting that it was executed by a tnointin prepared to resist the applieatitin,nshi`was th .., is arpresebt ',early the usual quantity of ' litute. The attempt was, ho •acme, • vean th e merely instinct/tit so Oppose it on the ground dine.' • toootry,ohea find it alniost impossible tot ' le, very respectable. t gulat sty. —The Court granted a cvoditional oilto f. togct any, and that what- is to be sold is . .. iikiiy Ott .t.g • Ivo OM 1114 kof o be kt r :si a l tt nt lliC Ken. rodent and to on thti oktrii/ to pie. id that his irk • *de Pia hot 'mire; • of the • lee: [ basset 3t ably settonk at Cr In the lat *AS down Knight Droved, rs had it !mitt sten a rd into further es ft td, :till for ere he . cerned Ulcers,. trot oil r, and would . it then t price - not Up. ten en- lito the aging, t price • Ain on, L0r,1., . which • Ade in • • e risen it glib it Myr ; d oititei • ir!fr .. nen . st theft er, tuns • 4 e hoe, D labia ke any ,stecopt . only oes the fo3n4 g.it, it. .epared . iumbly IsTbeen hat the market rut tp3 mastic- - I .made Tartlet rofit e --. er tun, . • Neashr non be lac the r,. anct., '• thui • COOP", tlSt be ball be all tor redito o haref.• • . to, my... ' oet, clearer • tee an of the such be the rattly leasby iths of !Abby,• .1.,0u. troth i 'U Or • leper to: t 4 . I, auJ • •