Star. — London, England, 1803-01-27 00:00:00

safe why this faculty flimild not he granted not withilanditig that the faculty Ihnuld le it w0i.!..1 certainly then he takcit it V... 1, u'aitoni any oppolition front the Re nor. :11e 'tenor h,u nothing to do with the gralitini; tile faculty That was a mere licence of the Ili. ;hop to fet up this ornament, as far as the Ordi y could avant it ; and if, :tiler that was grant. e,!, the Itehor were to nprole it, he fribmittcd lie would be funjea ur eccletiallical cenfores. I,'rd Et.aksiitoicovc 14.—1 t WAS very proper in the Ordinary to cite the RCL'tor in the firli initance, tot he would not will' to do a void at% But. it this Gentleman has the faculty, it will not aut...o• him to touch the riyhits of the IteCtor. Mr. Gtsrs fail the Court mutt determine the Ordinary had poiyer to grant the faculty, without the itoolcrit of the Reelor. Lord ELLVtiI3.IIIOUGH.—We need not decide th it. It is matter cf eceletiallical ;Appeal, if' the R.,:dor is touched by the granting of the faculty. Rule difcharged. CORE V. GIBLVT. This was a point of law, fubmitted to the opi nion of the Court (which governed, under the di. re6lion of Lord ELLENIN),(01101I, the decifion of this cafe at Nil ius). It was one of the many cafes which daily occur from the Aet, called the Annuity Aft. This is an Al A‘IIICh is not fpoken of with mt.cli refpeet, either from the bench or the bar. It appears to be fomew•hat fimilar in its died to another let of Ails mentioned yeller• day by Lord ELLENBOROLIGIS, which, in attempt ing to mend one pane, breaks three. The anion was on a bond for 14001. paid to fecure an annuity, and the defence was merely a number of pleas. which the unlearned call quib bles. Among thofe pleas, upon which ithies were joined, were the following : Fir 11, that the money was net paid on the 24th of September, as Rated in the memorial. Secondly. that the money was • not paid by the perfon mentioned in the memorial. The evidence jn fupport of thefe iffues proved, that a draught on a banker was given on the 24t1), but 'that it was not prefented for payment till the 26th; and fecondly, that the money was not paid by the perfon mentioned in the memorial, but by his banker. Upon thofe grounds Mr. ERSKINE con tended that the evidence did not fupport the alle gations of the memorial fo Ilrialy as was required by the Annuity Aft ; he laid he was fure the Court were often concerned to be obliged, in cafes of Annuities, to decide contrary to the equity and juilice of the cafe, but - Rill they were bound to de cide according to the provifions of the AR, fuch as it was. In a remarkable cafe of the Duke .Jf Bolton, it was held, that a draught on a banker was not a fufficient payment of money to anfwer the ilrid conitrulion of this Al. There was a cafe now pending, where it was doubted whether a draught of the Duke of Qlseenfberry's on Coutt's Bank, was or was riot, when paid, a payment by his Grace within the meaning of the AR ? He fhould not fay a word in favour cf the Al itfelf; but while it calls, he conceived that the evidence soull aridly correfpond with the memorial, and that therefore payment by a banker could not be confidered as the fame thing as what the memo rial exprelfed—a payment by the perfon therein named. ----- The Conn will give their opinion on a future day. MANDAMUS. Mr. ADAM obtained a rule to fliew caufc why a writ of Mandamus (hould not be &reeled to the Mayor, Aldermen, Common Councilmen, &c. of the borough of Cleat Grimfby, to admit a perfon of the name of John Cobbs, as a freeman of the borough, on the ground that he had married the daughter of a freeman, which, by the coldlitution of the borough, entitled him to that privilege.— Mr. Simmons, the Mayor, had refufed to admit him, though it had been Rated to him, that the conftitution of that borough required it. ' DUKE Or NORFOLK V. MILL, ESQ. :. Serjeant Coccsi.L moved for a new trial in this Cafe, in which a verdiEt had been found for the plaintiff at the lafl anises for the county of York. Lord ELLEwsnarrycer (who tried the caufe) milked him, Whether he moved it on account of his having rejeted certain written evidence, of fered on the trial, or whether he moved it ge nerally ? Serjeant COCKILY. faid, he moved it on both grounds, that this evidence ought to have been admitted, and that the preponderance of the evi dence was on the fide of the defendant. Lord ELLINBOROUGH then obferved, that the preponderance of evidence appeared both to him and to the Jury to be flrongly in favour of the plaintiff; but if the Learned Serjeant was of a contrary opinion, it would be nerd:try to reca pitulate the whole of the evidence given upon the trial. The depofitions which were taLen on a bill it 1767, to perpetuate the tetliniony of old whitener, were then ;rad. The Learned Judge then rca:i his report of the evidence upon the trial, by whieli it appeared, that there was a common in l'orl.ihire, called Mafpin.Moor, of which a part inclofed by the de feadant was the futijen of the relent aSion.— There were feveral manors adjoining this moor, namely, Hilham Manor, which the plaintiff re prefented ; Birin Manor, which was reprefented by the defendant ; Hamilton Manor, and Gaytf ford Manor, which had long ago inclofed its por tion of the Moor. The contell was now between the Manors of Hilham and niacin, about a piece inclofed by the latter, to which the Duke of Nor folk, as 'toilet to the late Lord Petre, who was Lord of the Manor of Hilham, let up a claim.— 'l'here were a peat number of Alls of Ownerfhip, loch as driving, ace. proved on the part of the Lords of the Manor of Hallam, and few in com• flatiron on the part of the Manor of Birkin. As the reading of the depoMions, and the Judges report, hailed til pall four o'cli.ck, it was :• : :teed, that the argument on this cafe 'hyoid be ollpoued for a few days. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JAN. 2S. MOHR() V. TWISSELTON. Mr. Serj ant. COCKELL moved for a Rule to thew caufe why a new trial Ihould not be granted in this cafe, the circumitances of which he Rated to be as follow ; The defendant, upon a dircovery of the infidelity of his wife, had feparated from her, and intlitutcd a fuit of divorce. In the mean time, while the divorce was depending, Mrs. Tsci&Telron bore a child, which was confided to the care of the plain• Mr , .. Munro. It appeared in evidence, that the child's mother vitited the plaintiff often, the reputed father never. The child, however, loon after tickened and died, and the nominal father having willingly paid the furgeon's bill, and the expenses of the funeral, this was underilood to he an acknowledgment on his part, that the child was his own. Upon this ground the plaintiff, Mrs. Monro, brought an :s Pion againll the defen dant for the amount of the firm, which the alledg ed to have been expended in maintaining the child while under her care. The Jury, after having heard the evidence on both fides, gave a verdid for the plaintiff-501. 'The Court feemed to be of opinion, that the rum awarded was rather too large, but did not think that this could be conlidered as a fufficient reafon for ditlurbing the verdift.—Rule refuted. DECICER V. THOMSON. Mr. Serjeant SHEPHERD appeared for the plain tiff, to thew caufe again!) a Rule, whichhad,in this cafe, been obtained by the defendant. He Rated, that this anion had originally been brought upon a policy of infurance. In the firft Rages of the anion, the plaintiff's attorney had re gularly communicated the Reps that were taken to the defendant, that he might either compromile the matter, or come forward with his objetlions. To theCe communications, however, no attention was paid by the defendant, who had obferved a flight irregularity in the proceedings, viz. the words " King's Bench," inferad in lime of the writings, intlead of Common Pleas," of which the plaintiff's attorney was not aware. As his aim appeared to be to procure unneceffary delays, and put the plaintiff to as much expence as pollible; he took no notice of this circurnftance till judg ment had been obtained in favour of the plaintiff, and then he came forward with the oblation of irregularity ; and upon this ground the proceed ings were let afide by the Court, and the plaintiff was fubjefted to much unneceffary expence and vexatious delay. The irregularity being corral. ed, the plaintiff again obtained judgment in his favour, with a provifo that he fhould give fecurity to the defendant for payment of the cons of a commiflion fent by him to Bremen for the pur pole of examining certain witneffes, in cafe their evidence fhould materially alter the nature of the cafe in favour of the defendant. Security was ac cordingly given by the plaintiff, to which there could be no oblation ; but the defendant ating upon his principle of delay, finding that no reafon• able oblation could be made to the perfon who Rood forward as furety for the plaintiff, applied again to the court for a rule to (top proceedings, upon the ground that the paper was not Ramped, and that an erafure had evidently been made in it. —The Learned Serjeant proceeded to obferve, that the pretences upon which this rule had been pro cured were in the higheß degree frivolous and vex atious. The futility was unexceptionable, the mitlake of the Ramp had been reetified as loon as pointed out, and the erafure, which was limply the infertion of the name of one month in the place of another, which had been fcratched out, could not in the fmalleft degree affect the validity of the paper. The judgment of the Court upon this cafe was delayed till the following day, as Lord ALT..). LaY was obliged to commence the Sittings vr Nifi Prism, during which nothing occurred that could excite the (lighten intereft. j•N. 25.—FIELD V. THORP AND OTHERS. Serjeant BEST, the Counfel for the Plaintiff, moved the Court for a new trial in this cafe, the circumßances of which he Rated to be as follow : A Mr. Deverel, who fume time ago became a bankrupt, and fled the country for a forgery, had, a few years previous to that event, taken the leafe of a farm, which the Plaintiff contended he only held as truflee for him, to whom the profits of the farm entirely belonged, with the dedation of a certain fun, by way of commillion to Mr. Deve rel, for management. As fonn as the Plaintiff learned that Mr. Deverel, with the real nate of whole circumnances he had hitherto been unac quainted, was upon the point of becoming infol vent, he with all poffible difpatch took the premifes into his own hands, and procured a deed from Mr. Deverel, executed and figned by himfelf, in which he declared that lie held the farm only in capacity of trunee for the Plaintiff. The Defendants, who ated as affignees int. the creditors of this Mr. Deverel, feized the leafe in their behalf as part of the bankrupt's property, re- 1 garding the tranfation between him and Reid merely as a fi:teul pratifed with a view to fecure the profits of die farm to die bankrupt, and there by defraud his creditors, immediately fold, under this conviCtion, part of the Rock, confining of a iptantiry of hay, which was, without delay, car ried off by the purchafers. Fur the recovery of the value of this hay an Ac tion of 'rrover was brought by the Plaintiff againft the Defendants. The Jury, however, impreffed with the idea that the whole molt have been a collufiun between Reid and Deverel, with intent to defraud the creditors of the latter, thought themfelves fufficiently juflified in returning a ver di& for the Defendants. The Learned Serjeant argued, that this verdift ought tis be fet :aide upon two grounds--firn,Thar the evidence adduced upon the part of the Plaintiff did not appear to have had its proper weight with the Jurv—and fecondly, That as no witnelTes had been called by the Defendants, he had no oppor tunity of preffing upon the ni;nds or the Jui y fe veral circionflarices tending to enrroborate the evidence of the Plaintiff. lie was now prepared to p: rive, beyond a doubt, u! truth of his client's allegatior s; and that fn far Iron, there being any icullutiutr ()ay.:en him and Dcvercl, the forgery for which the latter had fled his country had bean executed for the ex prefs put pofe of defrauding the I Plaintiff fle hoped, therefore, that the Court would not refufe to give itim an opportunity oi l procuring that jullice for his client to which he was entitled. Lord ALVAxxtY obferved, that at the time of the trial, the imprcilion upon his mind was, that the whole was a fraud, and that the Jury had Ihewn, by their verdift, that they entertained the fame idea. In cafe, however, his learned brother thought he could make good his prefent allega tions, it would be improper in the Com t to refufe the opportunity requelted.—Rule granted. RICHARDSON V. MACHWICK. Mr. Serjeant BEST moved for a rule to flew caufe why a new trial (hould not be granted in this cafe. It was an aelion brought to recover damages for the detention of 31 hides feized by the Defen dant in Leadenhall market, agreeable under an a& made in the reign of James, which direEled the fealers and infpettors of leather to feal filch hides as were found to be damaged and unfit for fale.— On the 18th of December, one of the Plaintiff's fervants conveyed the hides to marker,the morning following they were feized and carried to Guild hall, where an examination took place, and five of them were condemned, as they appeared to be unfit for ufe ; the remaining 26 were returned to the Plaintiff, on his making a promile not to bring any affirm againfl the Defendant for detaining the whole of the property. It was contended, on the part of the Plaintiff; that the hides had not been fent to the market for the purpofe of fate, and that they appeared to be damaged from the effeel of rain, that had fallen upon them during the night. The Defendant hav ing alto made application to prevent an affirm up on lie ocealion was fufficient evidence to convince the Court the property had been unjunly detined. Mr. Serjeant SMITH ERD obferved, that when the hides were feized, the moll of them appeared to be damaged in different parts ; the infpeEtors, there. fore, in&ad of cutting off thole particular parts, had taken five bides, which anfwered to the pro. portion of the leather found feizable, and teturned the reit that had been detained. Lord ALVANLEY adverted to the evidence for merly adduced in this cattle, and it appeared that the property had been fent by the Plaintiff to be fold. The Court was fatisfied with the former de. drum of the Jury in favour of the Defendant, and the Rule was refufed. CLARICE V. BACON. In this cafe an anion had been brought againft the Defendant for (peaking defamatory words of the Plaintiff. The ruble& bad been referred to two perfons of the names of Timbrell and Miles, who, in cafe of their difagreeing, were to appoint an umpire They had appointed a Mr. Simms, who awarded the Defendant to pay 3501. The Defendant inslifted Mr. Miles, one of the arbitra tors, for perjury. The caufe came on for trial laft Term, when, in confequence of the appoint ment of Mr. Simms, as umpire, not being proved, he was acquitted' without going into the merits of the cafe. _ _ _ . _ Mr. Serjeant Bat LIT now fbewed caufe againft a motion for an attachment for difobeying the award. He was fupported by Mr. Serjeant Bssr. They contended, that the deficiency of proof of the appointment, on the trial fur the perjury, was conclufive as to its non-eziftence, confequently that the umpire had not been legally invefted with filch eharatler, and that his award was, therefore, not binding. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN argued on the other fide, and produced an affidavit exprefsly Rating that the appointment was in writing. Lord At.vaNLsv confidered that the deficiency of proof on the trial ref - paling the appointment of the umpire was not conclutive as to the fad it had been pofitively (worn, that the umpire had been duly conftituted, therefore his award was final.—Rule of attachment was made abfolutc. POLICE, &c . Gv ILD H ALL . Yeaerday Thews: Gold was brought before the fiaing Alderman, en a charge of flealing, in the dwelling horfe of Meflrs. Bur rows and Rawlingfon, in Watling-Rrect, a piece of ariped cotton, containing 48 yards. Mr. Bur rows was in his counting.houfe,_ when two mcn came into the warehoufe, one of whom came to him, and afked for fume perfon whom Mr. Bur rows could not give any information about. Almon direely afterwards he heard the cry of flop thief!' John Greenough, one of the young men in the warehoufe, was coming up the cellar (lairs, and law the prifoner (who remained in the warehoufe while the other went to aik fome queflions of Mr. Burrows) inthe counting houfe,put a pieceof goods tinder his arm and walk out of the warehoufe, on which he immediately followed him, giving the alarmofflopthiefAstheprifonerranupßread-flreet a Mr. Goodenough law him drop the cotton ( w hich was produced) and did not lore fight of him until he was taken into cußody. He WAS fully commit ted for trial.—As was George Dalton, on a prole cution inftituted againil him by the Solicitor of the Mint, for uttering bate and counterfeit money, and for having more in his porreflion. Two young men were examined on a charge of robbing a gentleman on Blackfriars Bridge on Monday night Wt. The horfe patrole law a gang of near fourteen of very fufpicious charatters to gether, who were hunting every body they met. He accordingly watched them, And prefently heard the cry of Patrole ! Patrole ! He immediately rode up, when a gentleman, who faid he had been bullied and robbed of his watch, gave charge of the two perfons in oullody. He did not, however, come forward to profecute this Wines any fur ther ; and the prifoners, each receiving a good charafter, were difcharged. At a late trial at the Old Bailey, of a man who had robbed his mailer, whofe extreme lenity in duced him to defift from profecuting to convitlion, although a bill of indictment had been found, the Judge remarked, " I would have fervants know, when they are convicted of almfing the confident c rewired in them, which, in many cafes, is unli mited, that it is a rule Will/ his NIAJ es FY cercr to extend mercy to Liam." BY itTI S. O. Sunday tnornirl, the Ladi. of E 7.2 ,)!- Q2een's-fquare, of a fou. Tuefday, the Lady of William &ram, Efq. hmife in Nottit:ghani-place. On the sath ultat Byrn,Scaunia the Lady of Col. Ellk:ke, of a lon and heir. At Ofteover Hall, Staffordthire, the zt ft the Lady of Samuel Efq. of a fon. Lat,ly. at Woolwich, the Lady of Lieut. Colonel 1"):1:lif',7, of the Royal relltry, of a fun. A9.~F is icU. On Snturd laft, at St. Mat we, in the Firldx, Mr. Creen, cf the Strand, to Miti Ida tie:. Vollt.cr, dat.:l;:at.r et Forttzr, Flq. of Turuhamtreen. In Graltoarllrect, Dublin, George Smith, of London, to Mil' Ifahtlla A!tnun, of the cit.: of W'::te i. -J. lllaU. On the ad MIL in South Riebitionl• • _reet, Mir. Elizabeth Robertfou, daughter alt the dareafed Mr.ful.:ll:A. rave, mer chant in Edinburgh. At Calcutta, in the Fah in June haft. Dssid Douglas, Efq. third fon of Wm. Dou, , ,lss, Ef irt On Saturday,at Bath, John Crifp, Efq. of Celnienden,Survi. On the istlt loft. Mifs Margaret I)..lrymple, only dau,s,hter of Wm.Dalrymple, merchant, Edinburgh. At Stralocb, fslifs Margaret Rani!ay,elleft daughter of Jehn Ramfay, £fq. of Barra. "Euefilay, at his brother's houfe, in Hai - icy -Bract, Charlie Beanfoir Efq. At Salifbury, , John Blake, Efq. formerly of Ft - ex-Brut. In Dublin, Jonathan /Ulm, late CaptaM -6th wrinext. At Corbally, county Galway, Colancl i'erfle, of Roxbotough, aged 84. • On Friday lift, at Newmarket, Mr J. Singleton, well know, on the turf as a rider. On the t ith of lift month, at Troy Town, Rochefter. aged 65, Mr. Win. Fort.r, a Mailer in his hlaisfly's nary (ince the y ar r76a, formerly Matter ilttentlata at Jtmaica and lately Superintending Matter at Chatham; was Matter of the For midable, Sir Hugh Painter's Rap, at the time a that gentle man's important difr-te v.ith Admiral Keppl. HIGH WATER AT LONDON IS UDOI: TO-MORROW Morning • • •• • 39 mimes after 4 Afternoon WHEN Profeffinnal Men of educAtion and re. fpunlibility deviate from the in by the ft lea ion of a peculiar Brand., the Lnetion long continued fueerti is tfie belt criterion of femeriority. Ten years have I devoted my pradlire to the exchifiire treats mein of 'll-IRE:: DltiOßDiltS, and the fuc.wf .l refult of my plan gives me addicinsoll :.;dour opitofe as far as lam able the ravages of thole complaints which arc the molt import ant in the catalogue of humaa infirmities. After initiation into every beams as an Army Surgeon, formeil a with at an early period of lice to relent individo als from the ignorance of uneducated Men, or the equally am. gerous precipitancy of general Pmdtitioners. The THRF I E DISORDERS, to the cure of which I have de. voted my a:ten:lnn, contrite every fperies of VENEREAL INFECTION, whether of a recent or Inn" ' duration.-2dly. All kinds of DEBILITY. whether arifingfrom the habits at Selsodboys, or the indulgence of mature age, and laßly taut range sent of the fyilent in Women which is called BARREN NES:t or STERILITY. Numerous diftaies are the rcfult of ignoraace or hafte in the treatment of a funple Gonorrhea, :IN l it 1:t.: tit:frequently hap. pens that the feeds of Life are pnifone.'. ty the indifctvtion afar ungu,rde,l hour. By a Cupctiur rucliaud filch complaints are .racily ' , cured, and even where others have Lied, I trial that r may preCume to offer a radical re-eflabliflattwat. Few. however, are the cafes of complicated difirch V tie difoaler, compared with the ctiamitous htuatMns of Men, what from Indulgence In a SOLI TARY VICE, or the premise Gaieties of a falltionable Life, acquire that !late of Debility which Is the unavoidable confequence of Inch pernietttus habits-- Where the unhappy fufferer broods over his atifery, but caret fully conceals his misfortune, it may . he fonie cookilation far him to know, that although it be an °hied of doubt or uncer tainty with other Prattitioners, the removal of efe DEFI CIENCIES by the gradual progrcfs of repay-lion is theacloirew ment of my e.,perience. If the rites of Bacchus or Venus have begun to reduce manly vigour, mock anxiety will be prevented by an early counteraction f this languid Rate, and in theta c.cfes no great difficulties will occur. But where this deficiaicy bas for years milted, a proper Perfeverance is intlifpenfibly requifite to revive the flumbering (parks rat' Life, and tore-animate the Cortilitation. MARRIED WOMEN, who have long bean eirappaintai in their ceptdations of • Family, may be armed, that Wax* ioftances filch defedts are curable by Medical MIL The SECRECY which is fo &mad to my andertakiag, awl the Qltalifications which I have prefunted to Rats forts the Taus of my pretenfions, and in coincidence with flab this Inti mation is gives, that Mr. BREE may be confaltcd perfonalyt (or by letters inclofing a fniaU note) at his h uufe, No. ay, AVM. Strand, flea. Temple-Bar There to an additional entrance In Water-Rent adjoining and the name is ott both the doors. lA Siiii., -. 1.1:;;;;;Of the Ronal College of Surgeons. TO THOMAS TAYLOR Esq, DEAR sea, N. 9, Beidgmercet. London. I FEEL it a duty incumbent upon me, to inform you of the vay great and extraordinary Cure tine received from your invaluals.c PATk. NT PILLS. . About two plan age I was attacked with a VROKIIILAL 011• ORDER, which I treated rather Sightly for foam time, but dm Difeafc at length @eliding ill over my Body, 11 was obliged to apple to the molt eminent of the Faculty, but their affiliating affuidal only tatipararyreUef--1 watt throuzh various COuifto of Sali=tion, and from being =thereat a corpukat Had was reduced to a mere Skeleton. The Ulcers that fpccol all aver my limbs, rendered me a ceropicte Medi, fa that my Mena defpaircd of my recovery. When Montt ma this Sneaks. 11, confldered death as inevitable, hat a Manorial` robe conuataam *upon the many Cafes in sibiel year Pills had foeetwdesk I was induced to try a boa of them, which 1 thou& rather to. limed me, and by prrfcverance for two or three months, anal followinr your Directions, I experimeed Me molt onaccomita • Mc Re. laaation . from Pain, the Sores gra/Avail! flibfiding; I ant 0.,w, thank Goa, perfally recovered, surf walking out daily: I Mo. • not hut one more hoz, which I think cautious to take. will eIf...MIA my health in its original Bate. It is with the mit hoar:El gratitude that I fubfctibe alyfelf, fa, your roach obliged humble (errant, Was. Pia/11014 I)cankate, Manchefter, July E, :kg. P. S. For the public benefit I Jo not &sleet tattle *bore be. Ing puhlacJ, but love )au to ;set as yqur owe better Judy allln ditlAte. Prepared and Sold by the Sole Proprietor, Tuos. TA LOT. Member of the Royal Caige of Surgeons, Loodoa. at his Houk, 9, Ncw.ltridge-itreet: Where, if tti a coolant rcfoilence of more than tab ty -fix years, in a practice parti coheir dircited to the Cure of Venereal Comp!. ins, with that styli. ble feenc... which menial his Prukifion ahcoyi obkrve. he [lath ri Itimfelf, the advice and affißance he gratis:vitally ad mitting:ft to pesfaas taking this Medicine. *a/ be alarmed, br a dikerning Public, as an advantage fad= toba obtained, and void of ambiguity. - _ - AlfoSoiditytits moment, for the amen-tenet of thole living at a affiance at the Pertumer's, No. It, St. Albans. Brett, Pall-Mall; tie Toy-Illop, Net. to 3, Oxford-Bred ; Mr. Difborough's, No. 7, ; Mr. Ste,i's, Boolfclke, No. t, Union-11o*, Little Tower Hal; Mr. Wstfon's. south bridge, Edinburgh ; Mr. Calvrca's Dubin ; Mr. Ballinglis Liverrul ; Mr. Athinfon ' s, Manch efler; and by one 'Perks In every confiderable Town In Dreat.lidtant sad Ireland. BB Boxes of only ta. 9d. each, kakd up with full and plain Dave dons. whereby Perfect of either Sex may Care therdkaves with Late, Speed, Secrecy, and Safety. N. B. Every Box fold In Orval-Britain is Galled op crlth a Stamp, en "thick, by favour et the Cenuniellartev, is prima. at the tineareffted—T. Taylor, No. 9. New Bridsranor. to Indust( or►ic► is FrJoey, and all odS r ers art sovoirrtcit LONDON: Printed for the Proprietors, try JOHN DANIEL. (of Maiden-Lne. Coeent-Galen) at the Se Al • 1111111111/0•' OF I ice, No 1, Cary reed and publiNad by LEVEL KENT,of Canterburvolsee.Lienbetb)at No. t.C.arty-Orart. awl at the Si wa.or me. Temple-I:sr : iambi* Ofire coarona.k..dionifc7 tilt LOS I or amt ra (Felted to be addragai I