Star. — London, England, 1823-05-17 00:00:00

awl I I • , .11 1 1 .1 • . ,• PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 16. Appeals were proceeded with at ten o'clock, when the case of Sir James Duff u. the Earl of Fife," was argued for the ap pellant by Mr. Moncrieff in part, and the further bearing ad journed to Thursday. At about half after two the Loco CitaNent.t.oa repaired to a Council, whence he returned at half after four o'clock ; when the Earl of LIVIRPOOL laid upon the table, by his Majesty's com mands, some additional Pape: s iu relation to the Slave Trade. Lord DACRE moved for Returns of the Duty on Mak from the year 1793 to the present time. The same Noble Baron then presented a Petition fro/it Roy- Ston. In the County of Hens, praying fur the abolition of Colo nial Slavery. Appeal Papers were presented from the Court of Chancery, in Ireland. Sir E. Ksiaratact.t., Mr. J. Pm, Sir T. WINNINGTON, and others, brought up the Maidstone and Liverpool Gas Light Bills (the latter with the amendments agreed to), and alsd'the I udders field Church Bill ; which Bil:s were accordingly read a first time. Sir G. HILL afterwards brought up a Message from the other I louse, informing their Lordships that it appeared from the pro ceedings of the Commons that a certain clause iu the Ireland County Treasurers' Bill (which the Hon. Member read) had, though rejected by the other Ilouv, been included by mistake in the engrossed Bill before their Lordships, and requesting that the said clause might by their Lordships be expunged from the forernentioned Bill. The. LORD CHANCELLOR (who had intimated to Sir G. Hill an opinion that their Lordships could not proceed to ex punge the clause) replied, that their Lordships would forthwith send their answer by Messengers of their own. _ The Earl GROSVENOtj put two or three queries to the Noble Earl at the head of the Treasury, as to the abolition or continuance of Shiecures in the West.lndies. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that numbers of sinecures were falling in ; and, with respect to the West Indies, fresh ar r.:moments were made; all, in reality, had been done that possi bly could. Sinecures were abolished throughout our Colonies. Bat the question was, after all, as to the meaning of the word Insecure r for there were a number of important situations not caking for much labour, where, however, both talent and re sponbility were demanded, and which could not be filled by a substitute. At present all the revenue and judicial situations in the Wes: Indies were obliged to be filled by those appointed to them. The Earl GROSVENOR, in consequence of what had fallen from the Noble Lord, moved for Accounts of all Offices granted in Reversion since the year 18‘20.—Blotion agreed to. COMMITTEE ON WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. The Marquis of LANSDOWN brought to the re collection of their Lordships that it was about a week ago he had introduced a Petition from the Mem bers of the Chamber of the City of Glasgow, who prayed to be heard by Counsel in opposition to the Bill now before this House for the equalisation of Weights and Measures, though founded, as its pre amble set forth, upon the Great Charter. That Pe tition, which in the first instance was withdrawn on account of an informality, had since been amended, and he now presented it to their Lordships. With the passing attention he had been enabled to bestow on it, he was not prepared to give any just opinion of the import and tendency of the present Bill, but he certainly thought that a measure of such magni tude, which interfered with established usages, and was of such interest to the manufacturer and trader, should not be slighted in its progress through this' House. He knew, indeed, of several Noble Lords, at present in the House, whose-habits of inquiry and study had qualified them to investigate the question in all its bearings and extent ; and, therefore, ke hoped that their Lordships would come forward in this in stance, and bestow their best attention on the pending Bill.—Petition laid upon the table. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that he entirely agreed with the sentiments of the Noble Marquis, as the subject was itself of considerable importance, and their Lordships ought not to proceed one step with out first obtaining the opinions of persons most ac quainted with it. With respect tp the manner in which their Lordships might dispose of the Bill, as connected with the Petition, it would be recollected, ' that a Standing Order had been adopted, on the mo tion of a Noble Earl (Lauderdale), by which certain Bills could not, therefore, be entertained by this House, unless they had previously been submitted to a Committee.—Here, upon the motion of the Noble Earl, the Standing Order was read.—He certainly knew no better method of treating the subject; and if the present case did not exactly come under the wording of the Order, he was certain that it accorded with the spirit of it. He should therefore move, that the Bill in question be referred to a Select Com mittee, as he was confident that it might be formed, without difficulty, from amongst Noble Lords pre sent in the House. After a few remarks from Viscount MELVILLE, as to the desirableness of having the Reports of the House of Commons on the subject, and some observa tions from the Duke of SOMERSET, who was inclined in general to the proposed Bill, a Select Committee was appointed to investigate the subject cf Weights and Measures, and report their opinion, and to whom Petitions were in future to be referred. THE MILITIA (IRELAND) REDUCTION BILL. The Earl of GOSFORD now restated and en forced his objections to the passing of the above Bill. Ile hoped, that seeing the state of Ireland, men would not hastily be sent adrift, to increase the sum of disaffection. The Earl of LIVERPOOL, while giving full credit to the Noble Lord for his motives on this occasion, felt it his duty to vindicate the pi inciple of the Bill. Out of eight hundred reductions, no less than five hundred were provided for; and only six or seven Colonels had refused the proposals made to them. The Earl of CALEDON spoke'against the Bill, argued its impolicy, and remarked on the misfortune of nut making such men happy in their homes. Viscount LORTON agreed with his Noble Friends' (Gusford and Caledon) in deprecating the measure; •after which strangers were ordered to withdraw, and their Lordships came to a division for the third read ing of the Bill as follows: Contents /8 Non-Coutents 9 Majority for the third reading —9 The above Bill was then read a third time, passed, and messaged to the other House. The Commercial (Ireland) Intercourse Bill, the Witnesses Abroad Examination Bill, and the Ireland Charitable Loan So cieties Bill, were also read a third time, passed, and Messages Seat to inform the other House. It was ordered that a Message should be sent to the Com mons, requesting copies of the second and third Reports on Weights and Measures for their Lordship? use. Upon the motion of the Earl of SHAFTESBURY, their Lordships adjourned, for the Whitsun Holidays, to Thursday. HOUSE. OF COMMONS. Mr. LA MBTON presented a Petition from the Portj of Newcastle and South Shields, praying that no Toll might he imposed on vessels passing up the River, on account of the exertion of the Ntw London Bridge. Mr. M. A. TAYLOR said, the idea of such a toll had been entirely given up.—The Petition Was referred to the London Bridge Committee. Mr. BUXTON presented a Petition from Cromer, in the County of Norfolk, praying that Slavery might be abolished in the British dominions. Similar• Petitions were presented from Halstead, and two other places in Essex.—Ordered to lie bn the table. ' On the motion of Mr. HUME, i variety of Returns relative to Newfoundland were ordered.—A Return of the Public Re venue collected in the Isle of Man in 1321 and'lB22, was or-' doted, on the motion of the same limn Gentleman. Mr. S. MICR presented a Petition from the Corporation of the Chamber of • Commerce of the City of Limerick, praying that a duty might be imposed on Foreign Yarn, for the protec tion of that of Irish manufacture. Mr. IWSKISSON, in observing on the prayer of tl.ie Peti tion; said, that at sonic future period it might be proper to con sider the subject of bounties generally, by which the Public in curred a tax of about £300,000 annually. In place of being an encouragement to home manufacture, they were frequently em ployed as the means of fraud. Mr. ELI.ICE said, that the bounty on linen exported to their own Colonies might very well be taken off; as they were suffl ciently able to pay the full price.—Petition laid on the table. On the Motion of Mr. BROUGHAM a return was ordered of all places held by John Wilkie, late of the Tax-Office, together with the salaries attached thereto. Mr. BROUGH A Al said, that a house was now erecting in New-street, Spring-gardens. He understood it was for the use of the Paymaster of Marines. He wished to know from the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Iluskissun) whether such was the case? Mr. lIUSK ISSON *aid, he believed a house was erecting as stated by the Hon. and Learned Gentleman. The matter, how ever, did out come under his department. If the object was to accommodate the Paymaster of Marines, It was under the ma nagement of the Admiralty. The !louse went into a Com mittee on the Registry ofVessels Bill. Mr. HUSK ISSON said, the clauses relative to a new mode of I admeasurement had been withdrawn, in consequence of various difficulties suggested by parties best acquainted with the subject. The House resumed, and the Report was ordered to be taken into further consideration this day fortnight. 'l'hc Ir ish Grand Jury Presentments Bill was postponed to 'Wednesday next. The Cochineal Duties Bill was read a first time, and went through a Committee.—The Report was ordered to be received on Wednesday next. The Silk Manufacture Bill was ordered to be read a second time on Wednesday next. slr. BROUGHAM brought in the Beer Trade Bill, which was read a first and second time, and ordered to be committed on Friday next. The lion. Member took that opportunity to re fer to a Bill upon the same subject about to be introduced by the Hon. Member fer Reading, and which evidently came from some brewers, to enable them to sell by retail their own beer. Now, his own Bill was to enable every person to sell beer, therefore any Bill for a more limited object was superfluous. t would re semble the well-known expedient of a person who had two cats, and who made two holes in his garden wall, a large and a small one, to allow them to pass through—(A laugh). If the friends of the smaller animal on the present occasion should think proper to oppose Ms large and more general one, they were at full liberty to do so; but he thought the House would see there would be no necessity for the more confined measure if his Bill should pass. The Masters and Appentices Bill was read a Ara and second time, and went through a Committee, and the Report ordered to be received on Wednesday next. Lord F. OSBORNE presented a Petition from John Clarke, of Skipton, In the County of York, complaining that he had been imprisoned for two years in the jail of that county, and had been kept to hard labour during the whole of that time ; had been re fused, on his discharge, any portion of the produce of bis 200 days labour ; and complained of the punishment of the Tread-mill. Mr. S. WORTLEY defended the practice of employing pri soners at the Tread-mill, and contended that it was perfectly legal—The Petition was then ordered to be printed. Lord F. OSBORNE also presented a Petition from Martin Stapleton, a Justice of the Peace of the county of York, against tke illegal punishment of the Tread-mill. Mr. JAMES, in seconding the Motion that the Petition be brought up, took occasion to express himself hostile to the em ployment of prisoners at the Tread-mill. Mr. Secretary PEEL defended the employment of the pri soners at the Tread-mill, having received Reports from the medi cal attendant of every prison in which that practice bad been In troduced ; by these Reports it did not appear that any ill effects could ensue to female prisoners from their employment at the Mill—any law to prevent it was therefore uncalled for. He felt it impossible, therefore, to concur in opinion with the Noble Lord who had presented the Petition. Mr. DENMAN considered the employment at hard labour of persons committed for trial as an anticipation of punishment, and therefore illegal. Mr. S. WORtLEY defended the practice, and quoted the 22d Geo. 111. chap. 64. sec. 2. in support of his statement. Lord MILTON apprehended that the Act quoted by his Hon. Friend referred only to houses of correction. Mr. Secretary PEEL believed the Noble Lord would find the practice warranted by the 19th Charles 11. and he begged to be distinctly understood as not opposed to the employment of persons committed for trial.—The Petition was then ordered to be printed. On the motion of Mr. Davin GILSEHT, the Report of the London Bridge Committee was ordered to be brought up on Monday se'nnight. The further consideration of the Confirmation (Scotland) Bill • was postponed to Wednesday next. After a few words from Lord AICHLIALD HAWILTON, the LORD ADVOCATE Of SCOTLAND, Mr. ABISCROMIIY, and Mr. Hum, the further consideration of the Report on the Commissaries (Scotland) Bill was postponed to Friday next. Mr. WILMOT-HORTON presented a Petition from the In habitants of Newcastle-under-Line against Slavery.—Brought up, read, and ordered to lie on the table. _ . Mr. lIU3IE presented a Petition from a person of the name of Butcher, in Dundee, complaining of injuries which he had sustained from the operation of the Excise Laws. The injury complained of had arisen front a dispute between the Collector of the Excise and himself, as to whether his license expired in December or January. The dispute bad first been referred to the local Magistrate, but afterwards to Edinburgh, by which the Petitioner was put to great expense. The :LORD ADVOCATE said, that he had not before heard of the case, or he would have caused same inquiry to have been made. _ Mr. DRUMMOND was glad that the Hon. Member had brought the subject before the Heine, for many cases of -great injustice of a sinular kind had fallen under his notice.—The Pe tition was brought up, read, and ordered to lie on the table. On the motion of Mr.Cantattn, it was ordered that the House, on its rising, do adjourn till Wednesday. Mr. CANNING presented certain Papers relative to the Slave Trade, the titles of which were read, and the Papers or dered to lie on the table. THE CHIEF BARON O'ORADY. Mr. WYNN brought up a Report of the Com mittee appointed to inquire into the Report presented by the Commissioners of the Courts of Law in Ireland. Mr. S. RICE observed that be was glad to find that the propositions which he had brought forward were affirmed by the Report. He hoped, however, that now they had arrived at this point, the Members of his Majesty's Government would take such steps as justice required, and not cast upon one individual the whole trouble of conducting the measure. Mr. Secretary CANNING said, that if the Hon. Member intended to affirm the proposition, that whenever a charge was brought forward by an indi vidual Member, and in any degree substantiated, it then became the duty of the Members of the Etecu tive Government to take up the charge and institute a prosecution, he assumed that which was neither sanctioned by Parliamentary custom nor principle.— He had never heard that when Mr. Burke had brought forward charges against Mr. Hastings, and , substantiated some of them, he had thought himself I entitled to cast upon the Government the further pro secution of the affair. He had not heard that when Mr. Whitbread brought charges against Lord Mel ville, he had thought himselt entitled to call upon the Government to push the matter to trial. If in those cases such a proceeding had Out been necessary, upon to act. II& certainly did not, and he hoped that his colleagues had the same feeling. Sir J. NEWPORT contended, that as this pro ceeding had been caut.ed by a Special Commission appointed by the Crown, there was a distinction be tween this and ordinary cases, and that therefore it was the business of Government to proceed. ' -Mr. W. WYNN thought this a case in which the Government Was not at all called upon to inter fere. %Vas this the first case which had originated from a Commission ? No, Lord Melville! impeach ment had been conducted in the same manner; but the individual who originated it had not thought that a sufficient reason for calling upon the Govern ment to take the measure into its own hands. Mr. ABERCROM BY contended, that as this had originated in a Commission from the Crown, the Go vernment was called on to interfere. He thought that the declaration of the Right Hon. Gentleman, that neither he nor his Colleagues would interfere, led to the inference that Government would have no thing to do with, and would therefore defeat it. Mr. CANNING rose distinctly to deny the infer ence drawn by the Hon. Member. On the contrary, when the subject was brought forward, he would do all that he could do ; he would give his constant at tendance and unwearied attention. He was in total ignorance of the merits of the case, but pledged himself there should be no insinuation of a want on the part of Government. Every attention should be paid, but he would not consent that the task of impeachment should be thrown on the Government. Mr. IVYNN made some observations on the Com mittee which had sat, and asserted that he had given his constant attendance. Mr. S. RICE felt it just to state, that nothing could be more sedulous than the attention which the Right Hon. Gentleman had paid to the whole proceedings ; and he felt a perfict reliance upon that Right Hun. Gentleman conducting himself in the same manner whenever the case was discussed in the House. For his own part, he never would retire from the perform ance of his duty, although he protested against the weight of this proceeding being thrown upon himself Mr. A BERCRONIBY explained. Mr. CANNING was sorry to trouble the House again. He was neither for nor against the individual who was the subject of this inquiry. He cared nothing for the result, except as far as a general anxiety that an individUal in so high a station should be able to justify himself from a degrading charge. He could only say, that the case, if brought forward, should receive every attention. Mr. DErgMAN said, that the charge had not ori ginated with his Hon. Fi icad (Mr. Rice). • It had ori ginated at a public Board appointed by Royal Com mission, and a report had been made before his Hon. Friend brought the subject forward. He thought that the declaration of the Right Hon. Gentleman, that Government would not in any case take up such a measure was a little premature. The Right Hon. Gentleman had said that this was not the case of a removable officer. He said that the officer was re-, . . still less was it so in the present instance: If the Mr. HUME.—A Judge was reported to hav e case now beforethe Hedte affected aremovableofficer, jured his trust; was it not the duty of hi s then he would admit that if a case of corruption was Government to investigate that accusation made opt against such an officer, it would be incum- thought it was not right to call on any indivil bent on the Executive Government, as such, to take bring that charge before the House, but it measures for the removal of that officer. But he duty of the Government to see that the soot contended that it had never been the custom for an Lice was not thus shamefully polluted. individual Member to bring forward a charge, and Dr. LUSHINGTON considered this a - after having pushed that charge to a certain extent, stitutional question.. If gross peculatit to take it for granted that the Government would vered in a Judge, it was the duty of the take the business out of the hands of the accuser.— to bring him to punishment, provided it asu i d The Honourable Gentleman knew that there were done without proceeding in this House; but he bt two coor.es open to him; either to proceed by Ad- means thought that the Glveroment sit( dress to the Crown, or by impeachment. Either of the investigation in this House. It wa s these courses was as open to individual Members as however, that the charge could test bete, to the Executive Government, and he was sure that lied upon the prudence ot Government to in the House would see that there were many reasons I Mr. CANNING explained. that the only why in general cases an impeachment was much bet-; he ventured to express was founded upon t h e , ter in any hands than in the hands O Ministers. Ile sumption that the interference of Parliament therefore told the Hon. Member most distinctly, that meet the case of the I lon. Member for Limerick in this case mo Member of the Government felt called I The Report was ordered to be printed. MESSAGE FROM THE I. , !RDS. A Message from the Lords announced that their had agreed to Oil Irish Mi:itia Reduction Bill and see, vate rills, without any-amendments. ittlstl TITHES COMMUTATION SILL Mr. GOULBURN moved that the Order of Day for the second reading of the Irish Tithes ' mutation Bill should be then read. The Order was accordingly read, and on the motion SPICA Kt% should leave the Chair, Mr. V. FITZGE It A L 1) had objections to di( principle of this Bill. While it professed to relit the People, he believed it would allow the Clergy call for an equivalent for Tithes which they had - claimed nor sought for. The Bill previded for thel appointment of Commissioners to •alue Tithe - Prol perry, who were to be appointed by vestr i es and the incumbents jointly. If the inc u mb ent , t h ere f ore, was dissatisfied with what he was to rece i ve , h e h ad no. thing to do but to appoint a Co mm i ss i oner on hit part, and then this claw must be brought into ope. ration. In fact, the Bill would be made a dead let. ter. He deprecated the Tithe on potatoes, on whicia nine tenths of the population subsisted. In Munster it had long prevailed to a great extent, but he be lieved it had never been-exacted in Connaught till recently. In Ulster the Tithe on potatoes hadrarely been taken, and never in the diocese of Armagh. If this Bill gave rise to the demand on the part of the Clergy of Tithes they had never claimed since the Reformation, he had a principle on which he had a right to oppose the Speaker's. leaving the Chair. He should not, however, object to the proceeding on the Bill, if he were assured that it would not be acted upon for this yeAr. He would warn them that this was not a Bill which they could amend as they could a Grand Jury Presentment Act: besides, he believed that this Bill would triple, and in some cases quadru ple, the incomes of the Clergy, and therefore it would produce much discontent among their redundant and unemployed population. He implored the House to pause before it adopted a measure which the Clergy protested against ; and which would neither relieve nor satisfy the People. Mr. GOULBURN was sorry to find himself op. posed by his Right Hon. Friend. If he were antioes to obtain a certain degree of popularity, he would abandon that part of the Bill which the Clergy ob jected to. But he felt it his 'duty to look to higher motives, and to propose measures which he knew be could defend ; at the same time he was aware of the great difficulties with which this question was rounded. He only called on the House to consider whether this was not a measure which was as little objectionable as any that could be proposed, and whether the objectionable parts could not be amended in the Committee. It was his wish to have parsed this Bill pro forma through the Committee, and then to have been published as amended ; but this was op posed by others. In England tythes fall on the man of property ; in Ireland they fall on the lowest pea sant. The great evil of the tythe system in Ireland arose from its often bringing the clergyman in im mediate contact with the cultivator of the soil. He movable by an address from that House. His Ma- would ask the House if the Bill before them would •- jesty's Ministers ought, therefore, to take upon them- not remove much of the litigation that had prevailed! selves the responsibility ; they ought to consider the Some individual for the clergyman, was to settle with case, and if anything required inquiry, it ought to be one on the part of the parish, the modus of the tythes. through the medium of the Ministers of the Crown. He at the same time was not insensible of the diffi- He would ask, was it right for the leading Minister in culty of the task ; but he trusted it would not be ins that House to state that in any case the Government possible to create a similar class of men as in this would not take part in such an address? country ; and the present appeared to him one of the Mr. CANNING said, that of course when lie spoke best opportunities for that purpose. Though the qua of a removable officer, he meant removable at the lification for a vestry-man was too high in the Bill, power of the Crown.—Mr. DENMAN explained. yet that might be amended in the Committee, and he • Mr. PEEL would ask whether, if the Honourable would be the first to listen to any hints that might ' Member for Limerick thought the case a clear one, improve the Bill. He still adhered to the opinion, he would have any objection to proceed ? The Ho- that the right of property, whether civil or ecdesias- nourable Member felt that there were difficulties in tical, was not to be invaded ; as it was impossible to the case, and therefore he wished to throw them upon know where such an invasion might stop. He did the Government. He thought that it was a danger- not mean that, a compulsory power should be the ous principle to establish, that the Government foundation of the Bill. But a certain degree of com should always take up such proceedings. It was pulsory power was netlssary, as a check to thosewhe competent to any Member to institute an impeach- were discussing the claims. At the same time he was ment. But when an Honourable Member had ac- willing to adopt an intermediate course, between tually commenced the proceeding, upon what ground voluntary agreement and a com p u l so ry power. He could he now deviate from the execution of a duty had struck out of the Bill that part that gave so much which he had in the first instance taken upon himself? power to the Parish Vestry, as he found it would not Mr. S. RICE protested against the supposition that have answered the end intended. If he had forboine his opinion had been changed on a consideration of to touch upon many of the topics inthe speech of his the case.— Mr. Peet explained. Right Hon. Friend, it was from his anxiety that the Mr. R. SMITH thought it was perfectly right that Bill should ga into the Committee, where alone its Ministers, as such, should not take part in impeach- merits and defects could be properly appreciated. meats. But before they came to that point, it was Mr. WETHERELL objected to the principle of the duty of Ministers to examine whether there were the Bill, because it deprived the Clergy of their cha not grounds for other proceedings. His notion was, ratter of Freeholders, and gave them a character of that there was another mode of entering into thews- pensioners on the State, levying their pensions by a tion. The Judges held their offices by patent granted machinery like that of the Poor-rate in England.— " guamdiu se b gesserint." That implied, that for The proposition in the Bill was entirely new, as Mr. any malversation in office thei e was a mode of calling Pitt, who thought of the commutation of tithes, newel the patent in question, and trying whether it had not thought of depriving the Clergyman of his territorial been forfeited. The mode he alluded to was by a character. Mr. Pitt proposed to give him, the Cler writ of scire facias. He did not recollect any instance gyman, land instead of tithes. It was an objection to in which the patent of a Judge had been thus re-1 this Bill also, that while it professed to be a measure pealed ; but by analogy he contended that it might of conciliation, it forced the parties, noleas voices, to be. He found, however, by a memorandum in the, a commutation. They were brought to the gusto/a Reports of Coke; that John Wallcrner, a learned and i in rincu/is, and 'subjected to the brutunt fulmee of the courageous man, being Chief Baron by patent "qualm- Government. He thought some harmonising, con • diu se bent gesserint; who, on being attempted to be ciliatory, and intermediate measures were practicable; removed from that office, had declared that he could but, at any rate, in a case in which there werweee'a nor quit his place until cause had been strewn by scire tigia nulla retrorston, they should not come to a cosk , 4 - farina. The Hon.*Member thought that this was a' elusion hastily—t.he Bill should be printed, and 'he -- precedent which might be followed on this occasion. I persed throughout Ireland. Ile did not think the 2. Mr. WETHERELL spoke 'against the .docti ine curity offered to the . Clergyman, who had now an that Government was bound to take up nivatrures of absolute claim in rem, was adequate to that which he the kind now before the House. rciinquished. If the Churchwardens refused to I sy, A to bare his Mare + :usation? Kit it vo ts e source of is iw, a great p i Lion Wa s du e , Govetim eit d ir could • ; but h e b y no houldori g i eme vas imp os ibi a ,le, an d h ere. o investiga tem le only op anii the sole es . rliarnent coal Limerick cd. it their lieedship and several El LL. Order of th e h Tithes Com. e motion that th e Is to the whole ssed to relieve the Clergy to they had never the *es of He lan quentl ciallr large mewl stead c would T rent i pulsor seen t Mn Col The Mr. which ThursC The Immo .~ coo 7Sh I. 8 1) 10 Leary thin .tea Odom] Viz HAI Haanb Vu Ban Asa mooth Ot to the after his h tins W our far, then thing tract of a Our I Whit day, Spa! The lado guei raj( the ! ever cub cilia the forc of farl prd caw diva