Star. — London, England, 1810-05-19 00:00:00

• Mr. ROSE brought in a ‘3lll to prohibit the , reign silks, crapes, and tiffanies, which was read ordered for a second reading. on Monday. Mr. WHARTON brought in a Bill for tr.l Millions by loan. The Bill was rt.:Ad a first second:hue on Monday. 'liter Scotch Superannuation Excise Bill was . to be read a second time on Monday. Sir JOHN NEWPORT gasf.e notice,. that he should on Mon day se'nnight submit a motion, founded an the report of the Com mittee of Inquiry respecting the Pay-Office. possessed_ ncdoutuldrin'tenn!,',.. But he must entsider the original opi- Ito they should have art opinion front tLe Co • e a dispositions of Gentlemen towardsthe an d not merely quotations of precedents'. It w i4e ; of this Committee, .and the cireumitan. little hard to keep back censure till now, as the t orn s - deli different Gentlemen acted. Making mittee had given motice of their intention, and tite r ; 'in this respect, he really could not see sent repoit was only a performance of their pledge. : _be called by any description of Gentle- Their fi rst report stated, that the gen era l e i etel men compromising with the House to state in the the privileges of that House , their analogy to s i miLt Report, that when that Hodge wzoupon a grave.oc- powers in di ff erent Courts, and their recognitio n e t vision in debate upon this very subject with the House the House of Lords, were topics which migh t b e • of Lords, the other Houee.had not denied , but had served for a future report. This was, L u r e ) . a tece in conference actually - assentel. .to those 'privilege's &Cent nuke; *bitl . wai it nteright; w 6, - t h e :" which were now T ies/it:meld. . Could any thin be nions of many were shaken. on the subject by s hy r " more desirablg, th an thet the)* who might be suppose ; ; assertions, to refer to what was, as it were, t h e ge ed most likely to di,pute these privi l eges , whether 4 liamentary history of the country, and of gav ot et e the House or Lord; or Courts of Law, admitted s f eminent liners ? Could it be called even indiffee e . . them ? Could any thing more clearly make manifest i and unimportant to shew, that when the Com m ; the recognition of their rights ? It was thought that : : had been in con fl ict with Courts of Justice otetyfth t e."! the Courts of Law had something in them anomalous,:! House of Lords, their chilli: andrighti had be et so abhorrent to the genius of the Constitution of the ;admitted ? Was that no additional ground of m e. House of Commons. Was it wrong. then, to adduce dence to stand upon ? They had been told that th e y the authorities of these Courts, the decisions of our: I had departed irons the line which the Constituti ' best and ablest Judges, acknowledging their right., prescribed; and they' had now, in answer . to . se r '•,! and power? This, in fact, wars strengthening them e ' charges, proofs of various sorts, that they had been . as it sheaved that such persons admitted them. If it i the right ; and it was fit that they should e ke., fe e: i w ie ,ere rson so s a n d l v y a s ;c o ed o , us t , ha w t th un e so p i r t i n v d i.i e a v n e d .ry au pE or per ity so o u f ree the o ri f g in h co s im the a y tio p n os , I ‘‘ e ' g eF e e s t o r i t ' ' t e he a H s w ou n se ic. so hollow, that the House itself durst not look into I Mr. PONSONBY spoke to explanation. its origin and history, that would be a good reason , never expressed unqualified approbation of every I ;, r . for not attempting any inquiry or proof - on the sub. iof the Speech of his Learned Friend. He ha d % e l ject, and for confining themselves entirely to their t that he had heard but a small part of it, but of the own judgment ; but When he found that even from i pert he had declared his unqualified appro batio n . the commencement of .the Journals, they were not I The Right Hon. Gentleman opposite . new, but familiar, and that they were'reedgnieed by I distinctly heard him, or be would not bey t e 14) c gro: the ouse of Lords, even at a time when the Lords i misrepretented him. had been disposed, if possible, to abridge them :so ; The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER far from compromising such important rights; he I and Mr. PONSONBY mittitally explained. thought, valuing those privilege.., as he did, that such i Mr. LOCKHA Wl' made some observations e n a view of them tended to procure for them the fullest i the - Report, and remarked particularly cn the use e t respect, as it proved their Just constitutional and un- . the wore! " comfrmed." as applied to the deniable exercise. (Hear; hear.) He felt it to be his : .Croshy, which he thought not a Parliament•ry et . duty to say so much, thinking there was but little i p' motion, at that House slid not seek a evyraatim sf ground indeed for the charge that had been made I their privileges in the Court. by the Learned Ge.ntlernan against the Report of the Lord IvIILTON felt much of the diffienhy dot Committee. (Hear.) had been expressed by other dentleiren as to the iaC4 '.' Mr. PONSONBY . Was not in the Home doting ot. the confirmation of their privileges be any ollkr I the wh o l e of the speech of his Learned Friend (Mr. Omit or Body ; for where there was, as in seine cao • :s, Horner), hut Must say that what he heard of it met dissent, there was also deterioration. 1 with his unqualified approbation. The Honougible [Some conversation took place as to the term of Gentleman seemed at a loss to understand the tame the motion before the House, when, on reftrrine t o I L. of the objections till some light broke in upon him, Clerk, it was found to be for the printing.] and then he considered the' state of parties in that Lord MILTON resumed. As the brmging up the House. This sort of candour on his part was like I Report, and thevoting that it should lie CP the table that ol'ehose who professed to belong to no-pasty • had passed, he supposed it would somehow or other whatever, but who assumed to themselves superior i be printed ; but he thought the whole and de. virtues and patriotism to all. .He must say, that if ; rogatory to 'the House—that it stew a kind of die there were any Member. or Members of that House, i lidence ennceming their own privileges. He feared who were always on the reserve, balancing the differ- i, that a reference to other Courts would not satisfy pee ent sides of the llnuse, and waiting to see' how toe ' sons..wh' disputed them. . popular scale weighed in their ditcussionc, refraining i • Mr. WHITBREAD declared, that front the state from delivering their own sentiments till thole of most 1 of the appendix; containing complicated crania of otheeswere well known, and then giving their opinion, the pen and pencil ; it at:reined to him to be ;me s e on prudential considerations of the effects cf the con- , sible for any printer to know what to print or %Ono duct of those who took . a prominent part in the die- . not. He by no means imputed an intention (..f dc. cussions of the • Heinse,-he vontld say, that in that. ceiving the House to the Chairman of the C mei.. : case he drought the Hop oUrable Member was exposed I tee; but he denied that the judgment said to be Oct to objections of such &nature quite as much as him- i by Chia Justice Wihnct, had - actually ban given; a self, or any of his .ffonourahle Friends near him, to ; bad only been intendetli to . be ci,elivtled, he had: the objections -of the Honourable Gentleman.— ' died before the period at which it ought to have lesv;t (Hear, hear.) He (Mr. Ponsorhy) !mist /fleet to : delivered. --1 k Instanced a variety of alterations ia I the immediate priming of h• Report-of such vital con- s the report, sonic of the most complicated tiatureorliiri sequence to the Hoese o until it was properly CCUsi- ;. he thought did not shew that respect to the Hear dered. It might be said,.' print it, and then i t cen : whiCi he thought a Committee of Privileges ought be considered." The solidity of that observation he •to evince. It was a most unintelligible fatrago. If would admit in an ordinary cote ; but in the present i a hill st ere brought into the House in such a statethe one, not until it had lain a few days on the table.—: Speaker should return it. Precedents, some whet! Perhaps it might not ccntain very objectionable mat- ' crazed, others partially, of mhos only the dates lc; ter ; perhaps, also, that might be the case ; though : —Bete re any Gentleman moved for the printing ~f he could not make up his mind on what he had not . this appendix, lie hoped he would take the troubl: yet heard. He had been always against the appoint- :to look at it. ment of the Comrrttee. -He might he till - that his Mr. D. GIDDY defended the mode in which the object was to attack political adversaries ; but he de. appendix woe brought forward, and which was as• nied that his conduct wes open to that reproach. He crecible to the promptness with which thceummittv? had objected, because be thought it unfit to io,k the ..were desirous ot plexhicing it. It was conceived be• opinion of any Committee: , and he now &elected to ter to protein it in its piesent state than to delay it punting; their Report, withent a sufficient examination , till Monday, it having been understood that the of its contents, and a certain knowledge that it con-' Members of the Committee would core ct the proe tamed nothing that might be disadvantageous to the ! ;.beets. He admitted the accuracy of the ohtervetio rights of the House with the public. HO might not,: of the Honourable Gentleman. with respect to tl. possibly, oppose the report ; but he wished it to list ' judgmont of Lord Chief Justice Wilmot 1 and hei on the table, till the printing of it was rendered safe; no doubt that that wools, have Wee among the ce. -for the moment the order for pritaieg it .should be : sections in the proof sheets. If the House thoteee executed, it would fly through every Part of the Uni., proper to send the appendix back to the Cowman, ted Kingdom, with all the rapidity the pest could . lie should have no objection to it, although he `ia give it. The House should, therefore, consider it not aware that it had been usual to make a fair to well before they agreed to a motion for minting. it. ; script of any parer of this sort, which was settle:n( l 1 Respecting the question of the privileges of the House, never read in the House until sent to the printer. he had not s%iinik from his opinions or his duty, and Mr. C. WYNNE condemned the citing of three , had acted his part as a Member of that House in an . nion of any individual of what authority some :n I open and decided manner. . . the report. He objected to putting on the Junrso.• The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER : of the House : a nalogies from the practice of Cent observed, that the report having been }:resented and of Justice in support of the privileges of the lime laid on thetable would he recorded, even though not of Commons. Toe ground on which those privilege' printed. Had the Right Hon. Gentleman beard it • must stand or fall was the practice ef their prthc°' teed, he thought he could have found so vbjection to : sues. Adverting to the cnerection of the summer:. it ; and he had nothing to do now, but to move tp,, respectins• Chief Justice Wilmot, which the H otto l r : have it read again. There enelst he no reason fer able Chairman of. the Committee staid would t'' preventing the Hou.e from taking the best means of place in thereof sheets, he expresstd his d°" : '': proceeding into it s c o n ,id,, E , i oon, fir which purpose ' the power a any Member to make such a corm, 457, bee„ had bee moved to have it pi into d. He could not - after a .Report bad been laid on the cabl e. . 1 : - sce the great sknger I . : oni printing it, a.: iliespeech of thought it would be. much better to r eturn the 1k the Right Hon. Gentleman migle go out to the pub. ' port and Appendix to the Committee, and wove lic, containing his declaration of his unqualified ap. : that the Report be re-committed. probation of every pert of tho epeech of the Learned , The SPEAKER , . howe v er , observed, that 2".. Gentleman who spoke first, without the copy of the -' havino allowed the Report to be laid on the tabio report to which it alluded. lie gave the Right Hon. : could not to sent off again the same day. Gentleman full credit for at last coming forward, and ! After a few observatiouslrom Mr. Rose, 1 ; for the support he had given to this great question ; I The SPEAKER suggested , t hat the report eie:; but for being early and forward in ivine his parlia.' be taken. off the table again. It certainly w as d e e . mentary assistance inamatterthat cos cerne e d the u hole ' up in a manner that did not entitle it to be Needles interests of the country, he could not give him great and it ought nnquegionably, to be r ecommitted • .. credit. (Hear )—With his enlightened views and ex - Sir SAMUEL ROM ILLY could not avdd .2 r perience, and his fears of the measures proposed by : kg a few words on the Report, which WAS 00W I" others, it would have been quite as creditable to his i posed to be recommitted. He could by no n'e 3 : readiness on this occasion, to have put the House in i approve of that part of it which attem p ted to pr' r ° of what his opinion was, before they pro- ; the privileges of the House of Coolness ("En the cecded on their own imperfect lights. The present I logics taken from the CombComb of As to , alacrity of Gentlemen opposite was very satisfactory opinion of Lord Chief Justice Wilmot. it h w i r de oe; to him and w the House ; but even the Learned Gen. delivered, but found in h is e terutoire after f de tleman, for instance, who lately spoke, might have i and it was an opinion a pp arentl y drawn nokle come forward at an earlier stage, when legal assis- ! purpose of being del iv er ed in Court, but wnte tance was wanted in the discussion. He spoke now ; might have afterwards chanted Igor a emn e __ with warmth against the adducing of legal and J udi. : wi th his brother Judges. Such an opinion . 11 ' 1 " cial authority in favour of the privileges of the House, ! this oughonot, in his opinion, to have beets ! doe r A, . e as stated by the Committee ; but bad the Committee, by the Committee as an au thority to guidortjzof.ll%t in fact, done that which they were not expected to When the argument was , that the decisoht do ? Had it not been a subject of debate whether or House were net cognizabl e in an y Court of I•4%rt b ie impitrtitildo Pik alba eisagial. ad a first tim., and • the .nionh ' s i n t h e. star At ppointinent o time-4cobe read a tes under whit 11 allowances s read a first tlm how it could L entrinratl PARLIAMEATARr PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 18. -- The Royal Assent was given by Commission to 7.lBills,amdllg which were the Highgate Archway, the Scotch and Trish Judges' Salaries Bill, the Innkeepers' Allowance Bill, the St. John's Hampstead Burial Ground Bill, the Irish Road Bill, the Aberdeirr Harbour Bill, the Newcastle Col Bill, the Thames and Med way Canal Bills, and several private Bills. The Conimis.ioners were the Lord Chancellor, Lord Aylesford, and Lord Walalng ham. Lord LAUDERDALE moved to defer the third reading of the Cu Lights Bill t4l this day se'nnight ; but the Duke of AT not. objecting to further unnecesspry delay on the subject, proposed next Tuesday, which was agreed to. The For;:igrt Linen Duty Bill went through the second reading. Mr. Ashley Cooper, Lord Osborn, Mr. Kenrick, and others, brought up from the Common, several Bills, among which was that for the Duke of Brunswick's Pension. GUARD'S DIVORCE RILL. Mr. Bunaoucns, as Counsel for Colonel Guard, stated concisely the facts of the case. His client, in the year 1802, had married Miss Margaret Cockson, and lived with her very happily till the pericd of his Raving England for Buenos Ayres, on professional duty, in 1505. Mrs. Guard was at that time the mother of two children, and pregnant with a third. It was her intention to have accompanied her hus band abroad, but the orders of the Commander-in- Chief prevented her. After the departure of her hus band, she went to reside at Ottery, in Devonshire, with a relation ; but, in consequence of her expected accouchement, a separate house was taken for her where she lay in. She shortly after became acquainted with a Mr. Hodge, the son of the apothecary and man midwife who had attended her, and with whom the intercdurse took place, which was the foun dation of a subsequent action. In the year 1807, Colonel Guard returned to Ireland, and was shortly after summoned to London, to give evidence m the tiial of General Whitelocke. He wrote severaltimes to his Lady, requesting her presence in the metropo lis ; but her answers were uniformly cold and repul sive. At length his client learned from some of his friends, who had long observed the criminal conduct of Mrs. Guard, that her neglect arose from the con nection which she had formed with ,Mr. Charles Hodge. In consequence of this information; although Mrs. Guard at length came to London, the Colonel, by the advice of his friends, refused to visit her ; nor had be seen her from the period of his leaving England for Buenos Ayres to the present day, having been employed in the service of his coun try, in Spain and Portugal, and being at present a prisoner at Verdun. He should call evidence to prove, that, at the time of Mrs. Guard's leaving Ottery for London, she was again pregnant ; and that, in June, 1808, she was delivered of a child; which child, by comparing dates, malt evidently ap pear to he a bastard. • Messrs. Walker and Lee proved their having en deavoured to serve Mrs. Guard with a. copy of the Order of the House and the Bill, at Salford, near Manchester, and at Liverpool ; but not having seen her, the papers were left at Salford, her last place of residence. - WAYS AND MEANS. The House having gone into a Committee of Ways and Means, Mr. WHARTON moved a Resolution for raising the sum of six millions by Exchequer Bills for the service of the ensuing year.— This Resolution was agreed to. The House resumed, and the Report was ordered :o be received on Monday. The Stage-coach Regulation Bill went through a Committee. Mr. ROSE gave notice, that he should on Tuesday move for a CoMmittee on the subject of Foreign Timber. Mr. DUNDAS moved for and obtained leave to bring in a Bill to amend the Act respecting the recruiting of the East India Com pany's Forces, and to rogulate Courts Martial in India. The ob ject which the Right Hon. Gentleman bad in view was to provide for the better recruiting of ti - % Indian Army, and to place the proceedings in Courts .Martia on a footing with those in England or.. similar inquiries. - - STAMP DUTIER. Mr. HLW.KISSON moved for certain papers, which, he con tended, would drew, that the statement made by the Rit,lit Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Perceval) on a former night was erroneous re specting the increase of the revenue from the produce of the Stamp Duties. The increase was progrefiive, and not in consequence of the measure proposed by that Right Hon. Gentleman in 1808. He moved for a specification of the articles on which duties were imposed. showing how the same were augmented, and the net produce of the new duties, and the augmentation thereon, from 10th October, 1809 to ISC9, and also the amount of the Stamp Duties. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER would rot. ob ject to the motion, but at the same time he did not think, front the wording of it, the Hon. Gentleman would obtain what he re quired to prove his assertions. Mr. 'FIERNEY recommended the serious attention of the House to the second reading of the Stamp Duty bill ; and hoped that the accounts now moved for would be produced before the second reading. He was convinced that their production would justify the House in not adopting the Bill. The motion, after some observations in explanation front Mr. Husttissos, Mr. TteaNi:v, and the Clutscw.oa of the Ex cutou'reovas agreed to. commrtTEF: of riot - mix:Es ON TILE NOTICES OF SIB IC A NCIS BURDETT. Mr. GIDDY presented the Report of the Select Committee of Privileges appointed to search for pre. cedents in support of the authorities exercised by the House in the matters respecting Sir Francis Burdett. The Report was in substance— That the Committee thought it unnecessary terstate particularly the contents of all the precedents they had found, as they were all so clear in support of the Privileges of the House. " That the precedents more.direety connected with the ease in question, went to stew, thr in order to prevent offences against the authority of the 11 .use, itt respett to Its proceedings, that puts pose could not be so t aczually answered by a recurrence to the ordinary and circuitous proceedings in Courts of Law, and that the House had uniformly punished such ofl'ences by the sernmary exercise of its own authority, and the commitment of such per sons, whether Members or nut. That the Houie had from time to time so punished such persons,, more especially in Bushell', Case, in 1701, and in the case of Ashby and White, in 1704, where the House of Lords decided in favour of the conduct of the House of Commons, upon this point, although both Houses were at variance at the tame upon several others. Also ht Atur ray's case, confirmed by the Court of Kieg's Ber.ch ; and Brass Crosby's case, confirmed by the Court of Exchequer ; also in Bingham and Flower's case, confirmed by the House of Lords.— The Committee also found L that In caces of Libeton the House either by words or in priot,the House bad uniformly proceedel by the summary commitment of the parties olfending, anti that • and • The Its, ------- Di Ceurcy proved the marriag e " -..eir'proceeding in such cases had been approved _. sit ie l..rite Of Colonel Guard to Miss Cockson, in 180 e, . at' tle by the °Onions of the most able lawyers and Judges ; 30n1C of 1111 Of Cork... e Bch i n ti i i s kin g domtheenet th e n iost . and especially emine n t andu c p s r p igh in tan; byen that Chief Iu at r ever sat te:t,iicie i the parish church of Ballytnartin , county . also eroved the execution of . the deed of settlement, Grey, in Cuyler's case, where he decided that the lionise may to• Which he was a subscribing witness. •• • ' commit summarily of its own authority for offences against its M. Elizabeth Dunrick, who had be en se rvant to M e s Pelylleges. That the Privileges of Parliament were necessary to ' • , the security of the State. That the law of Parliament was the fltuaril, at Otte' y, deposed to a variety of circu iri. I tinY• of the land, according to the maxim laid down in Magna Oakes tending to prove a criminal connection be- I Char t s, which'says that no Freeman than be committed to impri. tween her mistress and Mr. Hodge. ' • , _ sonment withopt the judgment of his peers, or according to the i • law of the d latid - ; h thaith b is f maxim i rec i ognixed the law -of Parlia. Mr. Lee prodnced the record of the trial,." Onard and.to i c n o c n on m i t n t , t v a ti vi t i h a L e s a t s ab a l u i s y ht:d b other y partancient o f whkh 43 . 000 i ni us e a n ge t , 11 . Hodge ," at the Exeter Assizes, in ; anal llt h at was a t h e clear damages were awarded to the 'Plaintiff; which, how- 1 the law of the land; and was necessary to the steurity of the state ever, were never paid, the 'Defendant - having ab.. itself." scalded. . . . f The Report hiving been read, The Rev. Mr. Guard; brother of the Plaintiff, de. i .Mr. }!ORNER rose and said, that it was not his posed as to a anifession ' which Mrs. ,Guard had : intention to enter into any sort of discussion upon made totim, of her hiving acted improperly. • i what he' considered the un dou b ted -ri g hts of that ' Eliiabeth 'Neseman proved, that Mrs. Guard VMS , House, nor into the original appointment of the Com :brought to bed at the house of her 'mistress, in John- mittee ; but he thought that Committee hardly war street, Commercial T road, in June, 1808. • : ranted by their appointment to enter into an emu - It was deemed unnecessary to adduce any further mew, suelyas bad been heard on points which that ',evidence ; and Monday next was appointed for pro- , ' House. deemed unquestionable. He could not let seeding in the 13i11.—Adjourned. tlit Ripon pass without noticing bow unpecessacily ' i they had attempted toreason upon the foundation of HOUSE OF COMMONS. • !Abe privileges of the House, the impropriety of which Mr. PETER MOORE brought in a Bill for allowing the This. struck his mind strongly. This was, he believed, the tees of the late Theatre Royal Drury mane to rebuild the same. first time that a Comtnitsee. of Privileges had ever The Bill was read a first time, and ordered for a second reading. ; 'presumed to enter into a citation of authorities in fa- Mr. M. FITZGERALD presented a petition from the Roman , your of common, essential, and inherent privileges, Catholics of the county of Kerry in Ire l an d, p ra y in g that the die- i •e trom the Opinions of Courts of Law, or of the other abilities under which they at.present laboured may be removed. i House of Parliament. In the best of times, indeed in Mr. D. B. DALY presented a similar petition from the Catho- 1 :all former times, it was the constant language on such ties el Galway.—These petitions were ordered to lie on the table. ' ' AltleisnC from the Lords announced that their Lordshipohed ; OeCaeiollS, it was the regular Maxim of the wisest pa. agreed fo theinsti Endowed School Bill, and some private Bills. i triots, and the :nost zealous defenders of the liberties .4.4 r .v.r. PALE. gave notice, that he should to-morrow move lof the country, that no analogies from the practice of liiiAildiesslinittMajesty respecting the regulation of Courts I common law, no opinions from any other bodies of 'Records in•lreland. - • 1 whatever, should be suffered to weigh in a matter 0: * - Lord HENNIKER. obtained leave to bring in a Bill to repeal ' such momentous concern as the privileges of that • * the Act which provides for the punishment of Women delivered _ 1 House, which never could be regulated by the prin of Bastards. 1 ciples, forms, or technicalities of law courts. He ,heave was g iven to being ins Bill to allow the Colouring and . Yining of Beer , ender certa i n r e strictions. I could appeal to the opinions of all those great men, Mr. SHARP rose to postpone his motion, respecting, as w e . those eminent Parliamentary Statesmen, those sages i believe, Spain , nntil Monday , as his Ri g ht Hon. Friend's motion ! now no more, on the subject of analogies drawn irons •on the Roman Catholic Pet iti o n stood for discussion this night. ether places for such a purpose. The Committee Mr. GRATTAN would b e e xtremel y sorry that either his Hon. were justified only in so far as they stated the prece ; Friend :"Mr. Sharp) or his Noble Friend (Lord A. liamiltou), 1 . dents from the Journals ; but to take upon themselves she std inconvenienced by his motion, and therefore he would f itivi t hem the preference , . and run h i s c h ance o f bringing it on i the task of discussing the question of the privileges of _after their motions were disposed or. if, however, the discussion the INuse on general principles, was quite contrary shou ld occupy a longer time t han he expected, he would not 1 to all that ha d been recorded, or known heretofore, bring it on, but adjourn it till after - MMulay. I in times when the Constitution of the country and of . Mr. SHARP persevered in postponing his motion, and fixing that House was, to say the least, quite as well under ft. for Monday. . Lord COCHRANE gave notice that be s hould, e n Monday, stuut, ;[aced that, on one occasion, the privi g-" as-atmittee present. In one part of the Report, the 1 • move for a Committee to in q uire into the Public Interests In Co mmitter ' Zell' Forest, and to consider of the Standing Order respecting leges of the House were assented to by the House of • 'eroVentands; and also .resp ectin g the necessity of enforcing Lords after a conference. '.i hat was not a sufficient Notices to parties interes t e d in inclosures. THE SUPPLY. ' reason and foundation for the privileges of the Corn *.. The HOuee 'went into a Committee of Supply. The Estimate, mons, which were :possessed in their own right, and respecting the Annuities in the 5 per_ C en ts. the Islend s;.c of 'T rim- were una ff ected by any authority elsewhere, or any s l l d, t he Naval Asylum, the Board o f A gricu l tu re , . having; dissent by any other person or body whatsoever. He ,been referred to the Committee, could not possibly suffer this Report to pass without ' M E , wed moved the following Resolutions whieh were a g reed to : • these observations. He thought, therefore, that the .Ed,poo,ooa--to pay off exchequer Bills of I ben. House ought to defer the question upon the Report ' et:slseB—Annuities in tie r. per Cents. .. i. till they had considered it more maturely. 066,788 —Naval c C es, ! Asylum, Ed to Complete the bu ed th i by fire in ngs carrying on. , Mr. WILBERFORCE had no particular objec destroy isos tion to deferring the question, if it seemed necessary for the purpose of further consideration. It was a serious charge against the Committee, that they had deliberated upon points which they were not autho rised to deliberate upon ; upon those points which the House bad already declared to be in them inherent X25,QcO--to erect, t'..e Edifices, ace. uestiu)‘...,) in she Island of Trinidad. • 5,50n —the Board of Agriculture. ats,ooo•L-the Veterinary College. i*StS,ooo—Expences of Forts and Settlements on the Coast of Africa. The House having resumed, the Report was ordered to be re. SeYfed 011M0PdaY• .~> I