Star. — London, England, 1823-08-11 00:00:00

POETRY. TO ♦ was. If I forsake thee, early be my tomb, Day bed untended. and unwept my doom : Around my grave let no fresh verdure spring. No plaintive bird within its precincts sing ; Let no fair flower adorn my turfy bed, No violets spring, no roses lift the head; But there let weeds and noxious nightshade thrive— There, only what to life is fatal, live : So shall mankind avoid the hated place, Shunted and detested by the brutal race— AU, but the shrieking owl and bat obscene, Shall fly the relics of a thing so mean ! But if—as Maven is witness such shall be — Death only can divorce my heart from thee ; If this fond breast shall heave its parting sigh, Loth only, as 'tis leaving thee, to die ; Then let Affection drop the pious tear, The tribute sacred to the heart sincere; Let not the gaudy pomps of seeming woe The paltry debt that pride to pride may owe ; Let—whilst surviving summers still are thine— Let all thy thoughts, thy tenderest thoughts, be mine; And when, thy peaceful course fulfiU'd in this, Thy fate shall call thee to the world - of bliss, In one sepulchral mansion let us rest, By the same simple grassy tomb comprest ; Let mingling urns our mutual loves requite, And death, which parted once—once more unite! 2111 FOLLOW= LIXI/1 LAW INTELLIGENCE. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, AUGUST 9. ST. JOHN V. GLOSSOP AND ARKENSTALL. Mr. WAKEFIELD stated, that he appeared for the defendants, to move that his Honour would dissolve the injunction which had lately been obtained in this case. The defendant, Glossop, had granted, in the month of February, 18 4 21, an annuity of £5OO to the plaintiff, and by the terms of the deed', all the scenery, dresses, and decorations of the Theatre were pledged for the payment of that annuity. In May, 1822, he granted another annuity to the same amount to Mr. Jackson, to whom Mr. Arkenstall acted as trustee. Notwithstanding the property of the Theatre was pledged for the payment of General St. John's an nuity, it was provided that the Theatre should be kept , open, and that the plaintiff should not interfere in the management. The annuity was granted in Februsry, 18'21, the glass curtain was not bought until Decem ber is that year, and it could not therefOre be said that it was pledged for the payment of that annuity, and the defendant, Arkenstall, in the fair exercise of the power of managemeat which had been entrusted to him, sold it, as it was getting old-fashioned, and had ceased to possess the attraction of novelty. He had acted on the same principle with regard to some of the dresses and decorations; but the produce of whatever had been sold had been applied to the use of the Theatre. The Learned Gentleman contended that, under these circumstances, he was entitled to his motion. Mr. LOVATT, on the part of the plaintiff, contended' that all the property of the Theatre, whether then in existence or not, was pledged tb his client. The VICE CHANCELLOR, interrupting the . Learned Counsel- 4. You must remember that this curtain was not put up at the time of granting that annuity. This security on the property of the Theatre was in tended to leave those in the management of it with , the full power of making those alterations which cir cumstances and the public taste should require. Can . you contend, Mr. Lovatt, that they were not at liberty to change the dresses or the decorations?" Mr.l.t,vArr could not maintain the propositionthat the annuity deed was intended to shut up the Theatre. Mr. WAKEFIELD said, he had the report of a sur •eyor, stating that the curtain was in danger of fall ing on the performers and the audience, on account. of the machinery which supported it being worn out. The VICE-CHANCELLOR.—" Any security given on the property of the Theatre must leave that property subject to such changes as the public taste would re quire. lam of opinion that the removal of this cur tain was an act of prudential management, and was not done to injure the property, but for the fair pur poses of the Theatre ; and I shall therefore dissolve the injunction." MARRIAGE EXTRAORDINARY.—II is singular that the decendants of CHARLES I and CaostweLL inter married in the fourth degree. • DREADFUL DEFENCE OF CHASTITY.—Abingdon, -• a town in Berkshire; is famous for a battle fought in 877, between king Alfred and the Danes, in which neither party had the victory, nor did they renew the conflict. St. Ebba, Abbess of Coldingham, fearing the brutality of the Danes, prevailed on her nuns to cut off their noses and upper lips, hoping thereby to avoid violation, but their appearance so disgusted the Danes, that they set fire to the Monastery, and every nun perished in the flames. A true miracle performed by Doctor Connell, of Bunno, in the County of Cavan, in the year 1777.- 4 , In the year 1773, about the month of Fehr nary, a girl of the name cf Ann Mulligan , who lived near ltockberry, and who was about fourteen years of age, went over to a neighbour's house on a visit, one evening, and returned about ten o'clock at night, having completely lost her speech, and remained in that state till the month of May, 1777, being a space d four years and about a quarter, when, her friends brought her to Doctor Connell, generally called the Mad Doctor, who, when he had examined the girl, and heard the story, brought her into his parlour, and locked the door. Then, placing her on a chair at one end of the table, and himself opposite to her at the other, he commenced by distorting his counte— trance in a shocking manner, so as to strike terror into the girl, and after some time, he furiously bounced up, flew to a dagger which was hanging over the chimney-piece, ran at the girl, swearing he would instantly put her to death, when she dropped on her knees, and exclaimed for GOD'S sake to spare her life, and immediately faintifl. On her recovering 'from the faint, she had completely regained her speech, nor ever after lost it. This can be attested by above twenty persons, and by the tradition of the whole neighbourhood." The Churchwardens of Manchester have come to a determination not to relieve any pauper who keeps a dog. ASSIZES. MAIDSTONE, AUGUST 1. COLZMAN V. SMITH, M.D. This was an action by , a surgeon and apothecary against a physician of Maidstone, for words of slan der Concerning the plaintiff in his profession. The case proved on the part of the plaintiff was this :—ln the latter end - of May last year, the defen dant was called in to attend a lady named Cleveland, who was taken ill in the night, at the house of her daughter, Mrs. Shoredyk, of Cozheath. Knowing that the plaintiff was in the habit of attending Mrs. Shoredyk's family, he called Upon him to accompany him to the house. The defendant knocked at the plaintiff's door, but being unable to arouse the ser vants, he went away with the determination of going alone. As he went off, he made some offensive re marks, which the plaintiff's wife heard as she opened the window, having got up to see who was at the doer. The defendant arrived at Coxheath and pre scribed for the sick lady some camphor draughts, and an aperient draught. In his prescription he detected a camphor draught to be taken directly, and to be repeated after four hours, if necessary ; and the ape rient to be taken early in the morning. The doctor had arrived at Coxheath between two and three o'clock, and on his return to Maidstone sent the pre scription by his servant to the plaintiff's house to be made up. The servant arrived at the plaintiff's house about three o'clock, and left word that a messenger from Cozheath would call for the medicines. About half-past four the messenger arrived. The plaintiff's assistant was then emplar-yed in mixing the draughts, but in consequence of the advanced hour of the morn ing, he awoke the plaintiff, and consulted him as to what should be written on the labels, informing him of the terms of the defendant's prescription, and that it would be impossible for the messenger to get back toCoxheath before six o'clock. The plaintiff, exercising the best disci etion under the circumstances,gave direc tions that the order of taking the medicines should be reversed—namely, the apes tent first, and the cam phor draughts every four hours, if necessary. The assistant accordingly made up an aperient and four camphor draughts. On the label of the first he wrote, '" This draught to be taken immediately;' and on the others, " These draughts to be taken every four hour , , if the first has operated." The messenger ar rived at Cozheath about six o'clock, and the aperient was administered to the patient. Next day the de fendant visited his patient to know the effect of his prescription, and upon finding that the order in which he directed the medicines to be taken had been changed, he became extremely angry ; and on his re turn to Maidstone, called at the plaintiff's house, ac companied by a rival surgeon to the plaintiff, and reproved the young man for the liberty he had taken with the prescription. In consequence of this pro ceeding, the plaintiff wrote a letter to the defendant, in which he expressed his opinion of his conduct. The result was, that the defendant thought proper to cir culate the slander which was the subject of this action. To several persons the following statement concern ing the plaintiff was made:—" He has a young man in his service who has made an error in another case, which I have since pointed out to him, and Mr. Coleman has, in consequence, written me a severe letter, accusing me of ungentlemanly behaviour. 1 shall, therefore, not meet him, nor shall I allow my prescriptions to be sent to him until he has made an apology." In one instance, this statement , had the effect of depriving the plaintiff of a patient, and it was ithis:ed that such slander was calculated to do A man, in the plaintiff's profession, much mischief. On cross•exaneination of the witnesses, it appeared that the plaintiff and the defendant had been pre viously on most friendly terms, and on one occasion the latter had said of the plaintiff that he was one of the most good-natured fellows in the world. The plain tiff's assistant was called, and interrogated as to his knowledge of the Latin language. Prior to this transaction he had studied that language for twelve months, and since the commencement of -this action he had received private lessons. When Dr. Smith called at the plaintiff's house, and he was desired to construe the prescription, he construed it correctly. Dr. Hue, Lecturer of St. Bartholomew's Hospital, was examined as to the propriety of the plaintiff's con duct in altering the order in which the medicines «•ere to be taken by the defendant's patient. In the judgment of this Gentleman, it was a matter of per fect indifference whether the aperient or the camphor draught was, taken first. For his own part, had it been his own case, he should have been much obliged to the plaintiff to alter the directions of the prescription under tire, circumstances stated. The prescription was written in such general terms, as to leave a good deal to the discretion of the apothecary, and certainly the plaintiff had exercised a very sound judgment in directing the aperient to be taken first, the morning having been so far advanced after the prescription reached the plaintiff's house. After the plaintiff's case was closed, Mr. Baron, GRAHAM interposed and suggested the propriety of ithdrawing a Juror, considering the respectability of both parties, and the impolicy of keeping up a feud of this description, which could not fail of doing harm. Mr. MARRYATT Said, it was impossible for Dr. Smith to yield to any terms of compromise, short of an ample apology for the offensive letter which had been written to him. The case then proceeded, and on the part of the defendant, it was contended that the supposed slander complained of by the plaintiff was perfectly justified under all the circumstances of the case. On the morning when Dr. Smith called upoo the plaintiff to accompany him to Cozheath, the plaintiff's bell was repeatedly rung without anybody coming to the door, and at length the Doctor's patience being tired out, he said to his servant, " Go on, my man, there is nobody coming." This was all the doctor had said, and this was the supposed offetrce alluded to in the case for the plaintiff. Next day, after the defendant had ascertained that his prescription had not been observed, he called at the plaintiff's house to inquire the cause. Another Gentleman happened accident ally to be with him. He saw the plaintiff's assistant, and called upon him to construe his prescription, but he was unable to do so correctly. For instance, he translated the words " Si opus sit," to mean " After it has operated," which was quite contrary to the Doctor's meaning. He gently remonstrated with the young man for his mistake, and advised him to be more careful for the future. On the following day, the plaintiff wrote a most offensive letter to the de-; fendant, in which he bestowed upon him the terms illiberal, ungentlemanly, malicious, disgraceful, scan dalous, base, and other epithets of that description, in speaking of his conduct. Under such circum stances, it was impossible for the Doctor to submit tamely to the insults heaped upon him by the plaintiff, and it was put to the Jury, whether the defendant's_ conduct, as a physician, was not perfectly justifiable? The facts stated in defence were proved in evidence, and the plaintiff's letter was read. Mr. Gunwav replied on behalf of the plaintiff. Mr. Baron GRAHAM summed up the case. The Jury inquired what damages would carry costs? The Learned Judge informed them 40s. and they immediately found their verdict for the plaintiff —Damages 40s. The r ase excited considerable interest in Maidstone. The plaintiff expressed his regret at the necessity he felt in being obliged to bring the action, and now ex pressed his sorrow for the intemperate letter 'he had written to the defendant. The trial commenced on Friday, was adjourned till to-day, and ended about twelve o'clock. BRIDGEWATER, AUGUST 7. ELLWORTRY AND ANOTTIRR D. BIRD. Mr. ADAM stated the case of the plaintiff to the Jury. The defendant, who was a man in a respect able situation in life, some years since martied a Lady who was the daughter of one of the plaintiffs, and the sister of the other. This marriage proved an un happy one : the parties lived together for some time, but it became necessary at last for the friends of the wife to appeal to the law, in order to put a stop to the cruelty and oppression which the defendant prac tised towards her. At the last Quarter Sessions the defendant was accordingly indicted, and found guilty: a compromise was proposed, and the Counsel tor the parties arranged an agreement, the substance" of which was, that Mr. and Mrs. Bird should live se parate, he allowing her the sum of £5O per annum for her support. Upon that arrangement being made, the Chairman 81 the Bench of Magistrates contented j himself with imposing a nominal fine an Mr. Bird. The defendant now refused compliance with the agreement, alleging that he had not in person con- I sented to it, and this action was brought to recover £12.105. being the amount of one quarter's allowance. The case had proceeded but a little way, when it was perceived that the plaintiff's case was defective, and Mr. ADAM consented to be nonsuited. Mr. Justice Bast desired that the plaintiffs should be called, observing that he could not but deeply re gret that such should be the termination of a suit so properly brought against a man who had conducted himself in so scandalous and disgraceful a manner. Mr. Serjeant Pau. said, as Counsel foe Mr. Bird, my Lord, I must be permitted to say— Mr. Justice Besr.—Let the plaintiff be called. Mr. Serjeant Proz:-.-My Lord, it is my duty to state — Mr. Justice BISIN—Let the plaintiff be calkd. Mr. Serjeant Pra.t..—As an English Advocate, my Lord, I have— Mr. Justice Rm.—English Advocate! Don't let us hear such things. An Advocate is an Advocate. Mr. Serjeant Pst.t..—On the part of my client I mast be per mitted to say a few words. Mr. Justice Barr.—You may go on, Sir. Mr. Serjeant Pin.L.—Tben, Gentlemen of the Jury— Mr. Justice Bm.—No. Sir, I will not permit you to address the Jury. The Cause is disposed of. Mr. Serjeant P5t..1..--Then I'll address your Lord ship. I have to observe then, that according to my notion of justice, the Judge whb pronounces the con duct of a defendant to be disgraceful and scandalous, without having heard that defendant, appears to me prematurely to express his opinion. Audi alteram partem, I always thought had been the favourite maxim of the judicial seat of England. Mr. Justice BEST rose, and with considerable ani mation said, " Then, Sir, I have to observe, that this man has been heard ; he has been tried and con victed of disgraceful and scandalous conduct before the Magistrates at the Quarter Sessions, who fined him Is. and it would_ be to reflect on those Gentlemen, to suppose they would have so limited the punish ment, if it had not been in the confidence that the arrangement made would have been completed ; and I do admire the taste of the advocate, who irregu larly stands up to palliate conduct so disgraceful. The nonsuit was then entered, and the Court pro ceeded with other business. UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCE. OXFORD, AUGUST 9. Saturday, George Tyndall, Esq. of Christ Church, and Brook Henry Bridges and Geo. Tierney, Rsqrs. of Oriel College, were elected Probationary Fellows of Merton College. Monday, at the Annual Visitation of Abingdon School, Mr. Edward Hawkins was elected a Scholar of Pembroke College, on the Foundation of Richard Wightwick, S.T.B. and Mr. Henry Wheeler Hawkins was elected a Scholar of the dame College, on the Foundation of Thomas Tesdale, Esq. as Foun der's kin. At an Ordination held by the Bishop of Worcester, in the Chapel of Hartlebury Castle, on Friday, the 25th ult. the fol- lowing Gentlemen were ordained : MILACO/116 Rickard Meredith, R A. Edmund Hall Adolphus Hopkins, BA. Charles Whiteombe, B.A. Oriel College. The Hon. Join Eden, M.A. George &. John, B.A. Wadham College. Edwin Faulkner, B.A. James Furnival, B.A. Gilbert Gilbert, B.A. Wadham College. Charles Tookey, B.A. Sunday, the 27th ult. the Bishop of Salisbury admitted the following persons to die Holy Order of DEACONS. Gibbes Walker Jordan B.A. Pembroke Hall, Cambridge. John Thomas Pine Coin, B.A. CaiuslCollege, Cambridge. George William Phelps Paley, St. Peter's Coll. Cambridge. Morgan Deveniah, B.A. Jests College, Cambridge. George R. Gray, B.A. Gonville and Calus Coll. Canibridge. Richard Messiter, B.A. Corpus Chrbd. College, Oxford. George Attwood;DL A. Fellow of Pembroke Co. Cambridge. raisinrs. Frederic Edmond Pesos, B.A. Sc. John's CoIL Oxford. Henry Thomas Borne, RA. Trinity College, Cambridge. Charles Smith Bird, B.A. Trinity College, Cambridge.. Allan Macpherson, M.A. Marischal College, Aberdeen. Walter Erie, St. Mary Hall, Oxford: John A. Prwse, &C.L. Magdalen Hall, Oxford. Thomas Forster, BA. Emanuel College, Ourdwidge, Henry Good, B.C.L. Trinity Hall. Cambridge.: Merven West, Emanuel College, Cambridge. John Matthew, BA. of Balliol College, 'Oxford. James. Weller. B. A. St. John's College, Cambridge. George Norris, Christ's College, Cambridge.. George M. Jukes, B.A. Tricky College, Cambridge. ECCLESIASTICAL' P ROM OT ION& - The Rev. Charles William Sc. John Mildmay, M.A. and Fel low of Merton College, has been nominated by the %Olden and Fellows of that Society, to the Perpetual Curacy of Holywell, it, this city. • J. Rev. J. Brown, to the Rectory of Kidding-on, Oxfordshire. • „ :„ POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET. Saturday, George Edwards was charged with having robb e d Mr. W. Mattocks, of Wellington-street, of his poceet-hnoh, containing bills of exchange, amounting to £2OO. l A A the patrol, went into the pit-passage at the English Op e r a . house, where he observed Edwards among the crowd. n o searching him, he found a pocket-book in the crown of his last, is which were e number of bills of exchange. lie lodged him ha Covent-garden watch-house. On the following morning b e ww brought before the Magistrate, when he said the pocket hook was given to him, and he did not know what it cont a i ne d. Under these circumstances, he was committed to prison unit the owner of the property coteld be found. Saturday he was again brought up, when Mr. Mattocks claimed the property. i t appeared by his evidence, that he took his son and daughter to the English Opera on Thursday night, the book be placed is ew inside pocket, but before he could get to the pay place, he m 1.94 it, and found the bottom of 'the inside pocket cut tangle* open ; and, on putting his hand into his breeches pocket, he fated it empty, and he and his family were obliged to return home for want of funds to grin admission to the Theatre. Ile perf ect ', recollected having been rudely pushed against by some na me without any apparent motive, and he was firmly coo vinced the prisoner was that man. Saunders, another patrol, pronootted him to be the leader of the nose and Crown gang, in Bunke: row. Prisoner, in return, told Saundtre he was a scoundret t and, having nothing further to say, he was fully committed. Buz-Loser Loosotes.—Among the watch-house rubbiai brought before the Magistrates on Friday morning, were thre e of that description of aiiaails commonly called " Lobby I.totage t e " liar Lobby Loungers, or " Jfalf scarp luf Steer —tint it to say, half sharp and half, flat—half a bottle and half price -A t e bully and half boor—in plain terms, idle young men, with empty heads and full stomachs, who in all the magnificence of a f r i ll pint of Cape, strut into a Theatre at half-price,. and manif e s t their gentility by swaggering from hot to box, el--; the bo r . keepers, and annoying the sensible part of the audience as muck as they dare. Our three pri-oners—or " watch-house birds," the Charlie: call them, were evidently beings of this earte.-,, their adventures would seem to signify. They strutted intone box department of the English Opera House .on the preceding night at half-price, and koff-seos-over—whether with Cape, black. strap, or blue ruin, did not appear. Two of them were paiti. cul.rly hallseas-over, viz. Mr. Bob and Mr. Will W-- 1 the other, Mr. Fred H—.--, was but so so. They first addressed themselves to the dress circle, where Mt. Bob 1)—: a slight made, half-grown, flaxen-haired youth instead of waiting for the box-keeper to open the door of thebot in which he wished to make his debut, set about kicking it with all his might. What Gentleman of spirit would waste his breath in bawling for a box-keeper, when his own foot, well appliedu the door, must inevitably compel " the :poetry:" within to ape it ?—and so it turned out : some of the quiet ones within—ken log such a magnificent thundering, did open it ; and Mr. Ha D--- was just settling himself to make his entree, room or as room, when one of the box-keepers came up and assured him* box was fuR, at the same time endeavouring to close the doe again. " What d'ye mean by that, ye named I" cried Mr. be D—, " is that the way to treat a gentlemen ?" " Sir," said the box-keeper, " I meant no offence, and if you will,walk this way, I will endeavour to find you seats up stairs." " Up stairs be d—d !" said Mr. Bob "I shall gee in here, come whir case may, as old What's his name says—so come along, Willy W—! —Hiccup." Both Willy W— and Bobby 1) now attempted to fern themselves into- the box ; the box-keeper and the company width exerted themselves to keep them out; the mutable - of the Theatre arrived at the scene of action, and, what with persuasion and a shew of his authority, he prevailed upon Mr. Bob and his friend to relinquish their attempt upon that particular box. But Mr. Constable had scarcely let them go, when the hubbub was renewed, and turning back, he found they had got the box-keeper up in a corner, and were trying, as he said, " to squeeze their money out of him"—for they had made up their minds to slid to the dress circle ; and, since there W 29 no room for titan h the said dress-circle, they insisted upon having their half-crown back again—" so, ork oat the blurt, you little rascal !" Thee was a great row ; the entrance to the lobby was blocked up; tat constable again interfered; Mr. Will W— collared the caw stable ; the constable collarid Mr. Will W.--; Mr. Fred H..- ' caught hold of Mr. Will W—'s chat-nil, and tried to penile away from the constable ; the constable only held Mm dieing —determined to send him to- the watch-house; and there the pour Gentleman see-sawieg backwards and forwards, w' - the constable pulling away at his neck and Mr. Fred Swim. his tail, for nearly ten minutes, while Mr. Bobby potted the lobby, like a pea upon a tobacco-pipe, squeaking foe help, wishing all contumacious constables and " &laggard box. at the very diabk. At length the constable prevailed, and Will W—, half strangled, and sadly damaged in his mind, led away to the watch-house, followed by Mr. Bob D--- asl the other Gentleman, and there all three were safely steed away for the night. When brought before the Magistrates,. they defended thee selves vigorously—alleging that there was plenty of room in ti box they sought to enter, and that they had done nothing worth of th e misery that had been inflicted on them. The Magistrate (G. R. Muumuu., F.sq.) told them be mill see plainly how their case stood. They were young men of gIIO respectability he had no doubt, but on the night in quesdin Sky had taken a little too muck wine, and that bad made them tittle too presuming ; that presumption had excited theta to& orderly cocduct, a riot had ensued, assaults had been committal and by a very natural consequence, they passed the remainkrd the night in the watch-house. Messrs. Will W— and Bob D— were then ordered t 6 kJ bail for the general riot, and Mr. Fred H— for suss* the constable in the execution of his duty. Messrs. W-111 D--, however, afterwards made their peace with their pm cutters, and the charge against them was withdrawn; bat Ur Fred declared he would go before a Jury at the So dons, as he conceived that he had been shamefully illasedsali was certain that the witnesses bad sworn falsely. In Kilkenny City Court, an action for breath of promise of marriage was tried—Maar 111 L*ON4RD D. BIBBY HARTYORD.—DaMageI fat the plaintiff £325 and 6d. coati. MNI••••• BIRTH. August 5, at Luton House, the Lady of Edward &adasiala M.D. of a son. MARRIED. Rev. J. J. W. Turner, of Little Hampton, to Was Haft of Chiswick, formerly of Plaistow, Essex. At Newport, Pembrokeshire, the Rev. Thomas Dariest_lht" tor of Sherrington, Wilts, to Miss Pugh, daughter of the So Dr. Pugh, late Rector of Newport. Thursday sennight, at Amesbury, the Rev. Ricbari WelA M.A. of Queen's College, Oxford, to Mary, youngest 41 10 1 1116 of Mr. &lie, of Amesbury. Thursday, at Totteridge Church, the Hoe. Captain 6.6. Waldegrave R.N. to Esther Caroline, yeungest diegkegr 4 f. J. Puget, Esq. of Totteridge, Herts. Tuesday se might, at Northampton, the Rev. Omogna. , Dissenting Minister, of Catwortk, I ants. to Mary Ames a ll daughter of the late Mr. Bliss rd, Surgeon, of Notts DIED. At Little Chiverell, Aram, aged 63, tie Rev. W. itichnik 28 years Rector of that parish. WW I On his passage to England / for the benefit a Rev. W. Johnson. Jar 31 , Orior3e - Kilearrirk• aged 62 , OP P geon and Apothecary in St. Blastin's-lane. Tuesday, at Bath, very suddenly, Lady Panircr i alllNlP" the lag Sir Hugh Paliiser, But. Thursday, at his house, Old Ma.non4treet, ¢dsirs. Mauls, Bog. aged 34, hte of the Ordinate DeparteMillr , * • *IL DUI 4 Dub'lit 4 0 • Waterford 0 0 Guernsey and Jam 1 0 Lisbon 0 "Welland 0 0 America 0 ' 0 MS DAY: /MO log 6 41 Frame 4 Humblest' It . 1 Fpleaders o Mika 0 - Gottenburgli 1 Jamaica 0 Wito.o -4101.41..* A Till.af 1 . 410 liOl4 BK I Di. it T0..m5,.._- . " 1 0 441111 1 - - - ill minutes atlas 1 Atte mum " • . 3 tnipuleafter 6 =.7...-... - .. LONDON; Mead and publiabta by Livia. KIM fkkill, Placr, Teryk,liar. A T' C" age e d tre rote Mee ROI *Weer ?reined 44 . A Warty kOBll It is Are dtG &U‘ I 166 11161 21, Atioft J ' ) 1~ 161 `4ll I •PI deo BPI lad. an 4 .rd OW /led divot halm imst. g_ = hail 1 pionl Not Mips Pub Palm out thl 1;1 iii im b