Star. — London, England, 1823-03-25 00:00:00

1 .. word that could lead to an opinion that the arrange knent made was not, just towards the individuals whose interests were concerned ; neither bad he ricer heard a word to that effect. His only objection was, that-dining Otitod of 4.5 years a burthen was cast upon posterity which did not fairly attach to it.— With. respect to the pretended surplus of five mil lions, could that be called a surplus which was ob tained by loan, and for which interest was to be paid, and to be paid by that posterity for the relief of which those five millions were to be applied to the Sinking Fund? After a few words from Earl DA RYLEY, theA mend tittit was put and negatived, and the Bill read a third time and Ordered to be returned to the Commons... KING'S PROPERTY. The Earl of LIVERPOOL moved that the King's Property Regulation Bill be read a third time. Lord ELLENBOROUGH wished to know wile ther,the Noble and Learned Earl on the Woolsack was now prepared to answer the questions which he had put to 4im on a former night? - - The LORD . CHANCELLOR observed, that the questions put to him embraced several objects. They were connected with a notice of what was passing in the other House, and one part of the enquiry was sshether it would be necessary to proceed by Bill. Now with respect to the necessity of his Majesty's proceeding by Bill to give -his personal property or personal chattels to any individual, the object to be considered was the situation of the person upon whom the gift was conferred. His Majesty might dispose of his personal chattels without a Bill, if that party to whom they were granted were capable of taking them without one. If money were wanted on the part of the Trustees of the British Museum to take the benefit of his Majesty's donation, then a Bill would be wanted. It was his decided opinion that generally his Majesty had the power cf giving his personal chattels away in his lifetime, and had it not been for the Act of the 39th and 40th of his late Majesty, it would have been a *doubtful question whether he might not dispose of them by will, as well as by Act during life. ' His Lordship then quoted several au thorities to shew that the Kings of England had for meily possessed the right of disposing not of the personal property alone, but of the lands of the Crown. A change had been made in the reign of Queen Anne, when a certain portion of lands had been set apart for the support of the Crown, but be fore that time it had been allowed to alienate its own property. The powers with which the Crown had beets thus invested were still unchanged with respect to the disposal of its personal chattels, and the exer cise of them was still lawful, he used that word as a Lawyer, not a Statesman, to do whatever it was not restrained from doing by Act of Parliament. The doctrine formerly entertained was, that the Crown might dispose of everything it had jury: corona. The opinion of - Lord Holt was not doubtful on the sub ject : What,"'said he, « shall a person who has large estates before he comes to the Crown, be deprived of the right of disposing of them because he has come to the Crown r' But in the time of Queen . Anne, when so many great grants were made, the right was carried to Such extents that Lord Holt's reasoning became out of the question, and restraints were passed. But there was nothing in the Statute which affected the -power of the Crown with respect to its personal chattels. The 39th and 40th of his late Ma jesty Stated what descriptions Of property the King might dispose of. Since' that Acr had passed, he could not bequeath such property, though he might give it away in his lifetiMe. Lord ELLEittliOßOUtli admitted the etplana tidal of theltioble and Learned Earl to be satisfactory only so far as it proved that he firmly believed the opinion which he advanced. He (Lord Elletsbo rough) contended that the fits corona was not the Common law, -but an exception to it, and that for merly the property of the Crown was governed by quite different laws. The Sovereign was not then absolute -proprietor, but merely guardian of the pro perty. The:Noble Lord then entered into a history of eeveral ancient Kings, to shew that they had not the power Of ditliciting - of Crown propetty. He con tended that Lord Coke had stated distinctly, that the King could not dispose of the jewels of the Crown, e:shich were 'considered as an heir loom. With re spect to the Bill on their Lordship's table, he could not-but consider it as a deClaration that his Majesty intended to separate his private property from that of the CI-Own. And when another Bill in the other .House informed him that his Majesty was giving Away his Library without an Act of Parliament, it sttuck hiin that it might be done in order that the King might have equal power to dispose in the same manner of all other personal property of the Crown. His late Majesty having many children, might na turally have wished for such a power, in order to share his property among them ; but in the present hist:owe that could not be the case. It was remark able-that Isis Majesty hid for eight years applied the revenues of his Crown to the improvement of-his per sonal property. Other Sovereigns had lived in royal palaces, and All that they had spent upon them had been for the Public; but his Majesty had chiefly re sided. aild spent the Royal income on his personal estates, of which 'lie now wished to have the hide - pendent disposal. Had not the subject been consi dered in a different point of view, when, in 1816, 20.000/. had been given out of the Droits of Admi ralty to pinch* furniture for the Pavilion at Brigh tOn ? but *a* new light had broken on his Majesty's Ministers. As for him, it appeared that the Crown ought to be considered a sulEcient equivalent for the loss of all other property. He objected to the prevent Bill, that it gave the feelings of private property arid of a subject to one who ought to be without. He felt that be should not have done his duty if he had not stated his doubts on the subject. • The*LORD CHANCELLOR trusted that when he had said that in point ciflavilhe King had aright -t dispose of the property of the Crown, the Noble Lord would not supp ose that lie meant to extend it to the jewels of the 'sown, which were l e Mpioperly .oalled an heir -loom. As it was mentioned in the Act .thist taitouid not.be alienated, it was an additional reason for considering that property not of that de scription which might be alienated. He would also . obsetve,.that his late Majesty had asked nothing per sonal by thelOth and 40th 01 his-reign, for the power given by that Act was not for him alone, but for all Lis successors, and was one which he had never used. ~~~ . 1 gle Earl of LIVERP6dt Saki, ' •t : the n in which the Noble Baron had made it necessary, though hisobier ssed h ims,. ' ions ' di d not in fact apply to the Bill. before, the' ouse, but to a transaction in another place, ihat he should enter into some explanation. k was due, to. the-Govern ment, and to the Sovereign on itiThrcte, - thatlei should repel the idea started by the Noble 'Bigot), that there was some trick between, the liberal gift made by his Majesty' to his people, and the Bill now on their Lordships table. Ile *should ask his NptAr and Learned F: iend on the Woolsack, whether - the two transactions were not totally unconnected with each other ? Whether his Noble Friend did not know that his Majesty had been anxious to have the power conferred by this Bill three years ago, whilst the•gift of the Library had only been thought of within the last few months? Deeply did he regret that the Noble Baron should have founded such a charge on a transaction which filled every mind in the country with sentiments of gratitude, and did equal honour to him who had collected that mass of human learn ing during sixty years, and to his Majesty who gave it, not to the British Museum, not to any particular institution, but put it at the entire disposal of Parlia ment, to be used and applied as it would think most expedient. He thought it too much that such an act of liberality should produce such insinuations, and that it should be combined with a measure with which it had no connection whatever, as a mere trick. It was the wish of the august personage that Parlia ment should dispose of his Library in the way which it would think most advantageous to the country.— When the Bill on the subject should come before their Lordships, then would be the time for the Noble Baron to discuss its merits, and for him (Lord Liverpool) to supply fresh explanation ; he would, however, say, that it had no reference whatever to the King's personal property. He should not enter into the question, whether the 39th and 40th of his late Majesty had been a wise measure; but he would ask whether his present Majesty, when Prince of Wales, having acquired property as a subject, which he was then, and of which, as such, he had a right to dispose, the House would deprive him of that right because he had ascended the Throne ? He put it on the ground of strict justice, he wished for no favour, no liberality—liberality, in this instance, was all on the side of the Throne—whether his Ma jesty having acquired property as a subject, they would deprive him of that same power which he might exercise as a subject, because he was on the Throne? Should he be the only man in his domi nions who should not have the right of doing an act of individual kindness to members of his family, or to any others whom he might think proper? He could not believe that there would be a difference of opinion, in a case of which justice formed the Clear and undoubted basis, The LORD CHANCELLOR having been called upon by his Noble Friend to say whether there was any connection between the present Bill and the trans action respecting the Library, would declare upon his honour that he had not the least notien that any•such connection existed between those measures. On the contrary, having been consulted on the principle of the Bill, he happened to know when it had first beea in contemplation; and it was not till years after the question had been raised with respect to the King's property, that he had heard anything about theli brary. If he had stated, as a lawyer, that with a sheet of paper and a pen full of ink, his Majesty might have originally relieved himself from the necessity of this Bill, be should have stated nothing but what every lawyer would know might have been done, but what would have been less honourable than the conduct of his Majesty, who had preferred obtaining the power which he wanted from Parliament. Lord REDEBDALE contended, that until the Act of Queen Anne, the power of the Crown to grant land I had been unlimited. It was true, chat when thoW grants were not approved of, the Ministers, by Whose' advice they had been made had been impeached, but even then the grants had not been revoked. Why had the Act of Queen Anne been passed, if the. Crown had not previously possessed the right of granting lands? But the fact was, that half the lands in the•kingdom were holden by grants from the Crown. The Bill was then read a third time, and passed. Mr. Batman, and others brought up from the Commons the Marriage Act 'Amendment Bill with amendments, to width they prayed the concurrence of-their Lordships. The lunendasents were then taken into consideration, and agreed to, and the Bill was ordered to be returned to the Coat mous.—Adiounied. HOUSE OF COJIMONS. The Stamm tame down to the House a few minutes before eleven o'clock, and was soon Sifter summoned to the House of Peers, to hear the Royal Assent given by Commission to several public and private Bills, for which see the Lords' Report. On his return from the House of Lords, the Srasittta ad journed the House duling pleasure, And a few Minutes before four he again took the chair; and this being the taut day for re ceiving private Bills, several were brought Mend read a first time. Sir T. LETHBRIDGE gave notice that he would, on the Ist of May, submit Resolutions to the House on the subject of Agri cultural Distress. Sir J. BOUGHEY brought in a Bill for the better recovery of Small Debts, in the Borough of Wolverhampton, which was read a first time. _ Bills were brought in for lighting the towns of Paisley and Chesterfield with Gas. A Petition was presented from Owners and Occupiers of Land inlthe county of Strathmore, complaining of Agricultural Distress. Sir G. HILL brought in a Bill for lighting the town of Bel fast with Gas. A Bill was also brought in for lighting the town of Notting ham with Gas. Mr. S. WORTLEY brought in a similar Bill as regarded the city of York. The Woolwich Gas Light Company Incorporation Bill was brought in and read a first time, and ordered for a second reading. Sir W. LEMON presented a Petition from Falmouth against the Hawkers and Pedlars' Act. .A similar Petition was presented from Truro; as also were Ththions from St. Ire's, against the Coal Tax ; from Leicester, against the Hawkers and Pedlars' Act ; and faun renzanco, against the Coal Duties. On presenting this last Petition, Mr. D. GILBERT said, be feared ads tau could:maim taken off during the present linden, but he trusted .it soosikeadmately be repealed, as it was calcidaid to have no other Salatithatte make coils, where dreadydar, still dearer. Mr. GREN FELL also expressed his tope that tide eseashife• one of the Mt taxes taken oa •In the next Session e.bet, libe his Hon. Friend, had So expectation that ablest testi be dad daring the present Session. • -•- Mr. 0. BENNET presented a Petition Br* Mk; ilikbardCa at present a prisoner in Doteltesterjail, pr ieft theflotrie to pot an end to Corporal Punishsropt. The Hoss:Mor.pe notice that he would, soon after the holidays, substal taNstssicata to the House on the subject. , • • ARMY EITRAORDTWARIEL ' ' ~' • The Report of the Committee of Supply **Oben brought up, and on the 'first tresolutioit for the ektm ordinary charges for the Army and the Colonies, Mr. HUM said, the first item of the Colonial Ex- . ......at. 5.,, ~ „3 - -:.• . - ... pervieVissll9,oool. for - the Capeof . Geed itiMmi- r* altland'and:Mr. Gourlay, he entteated•the Iforil Theie'wa 3 in . fli.is charcee an item.ofesoo/. for th. I Icirdil,Agent ; there vies ilso.a clivage of la . the Agent of Ceylon, and 5001. far the . Mauritius...-. IN° clott i , wait until the papers were before the:n, and then 0 was confident the statements of that Gentlernati old be proved. He complained that the lionotr able Gentleman opposite had made free to say that Now those Agents, he . .eontended, ought to be •paid lrythe Colonies, and not he charged as part of the he made allegations against individuals which be 'tnilitarry eipenditurc • There was• also an Agent could not afterwards support beeviderice. %M a l t* rimmed for Mahe,' and to that he had the same ola- had said of Sir Thomas Maitland was, that he w et tyraestical and oppressive in his Gevernmenr of tte 'lot: lonian Islands. These allegations -he •een.;idervielei fri,gtibton. Hon. On Gentleman this subject who lie mustheld the notice, Age that ncy te ' Ceylon, am. was now Treasurer of the Navy ; and he have been' pecivedisiy.tbe dOernisentseuthich he pm, tae. dileediandltid on-the Eiisie of the kull." Theife4 ficer ought not .to .havebneusalletwed m verreainals A ivi ii s e he tic ei y, to as, kn in o‘ i r lis if o l p le inio st n il , l o i l n e te t n w d o ed sit t u cr ati h o o n l s d were incompatible in tire hands of the same person? In- commend, where belhad disgraced the 'name ofam deed, he considered these Agencies unnecessary, they Englishman, .and rendered it iramd 'and Aisessiedmc ought to be done away, and these four sums saved ; The Honourable Mombernught to a nsui b itt h e t * * and he should prOpose to deduct the amount from not charged the s e t ramattions upon Ai r Ti,, :enas the Estimates. There was also a sum of 2,44E4 Maitland withi n th e l ast f our mont h s . li m d m i tied charged for prize.moriey paid io Lord Keith. He that since that period t h ere h a d •b een a c l umgeo f ro considered the thus delaying the payment of prize. licy in the Governor; but . he would say and .z: eat, money very wrong ; he wished to know, if this was that the docume nts w hi c h h e• f ormer l y l a i .l b efore the last prise-money remaining unpaid? There was the House prov e d, hi m. t o b e . a scourge and a tyrant also an item of 9,4001 to Baron Langsdorff, said to to the islanders, and showed that he ,had c o mm i tte d be paid in satisfaction of the subsidy of MS. ik acts of iniquity to this country—(He ar ). and injustice which we r e a dishonodishonorerl • thought these circumstances required explanation.— There was also an item for an allowance of 10051. in .Mr. -WILMOT said, the H on . M em b er h a d a l rea d y lieu of Coals and Candles to the Governor of ,E,li n . been told thatif:Mr. G our l a y' s P et i t i on iv ii-bri night .bargh Castle. He thought this was a large sum, and forward, he pledged him s elf t o re f ute any vase li r. ; ',required explanation. Ile should now move, that in- Gourlay might attempt to make out. Co u ld "h e sae stead of 620,0001. the suns should be 618,00 01. more ?—(Hear, hear).—A s t o Si r T. Maitland, die Hon. Member adverted to cases l ong s in ce di sposed of by the House. 'The Hon. Member then said, but Mr. WILMOT contended that it was not correct .to infer, because the military expenses of the Colonies fell on the mother country, that the Agents were Sir Thos. Maitland had .changed his conduct in the not paid by the colonists. If the Hon. Gentleman last four month s ; i n re ply t o t h at , h e c h a ll enge d s h e Hon. Member to shew any act o f t he G overnment had shewn that the economy which he recommended were practicable, by pointing out to whom the busi- during those four months, which diffe r ed f rom t h e ness now performed by the Agents might be con- acts of the previous eight. According to the Hon. veniently transferred, there might be some fair gr on nds Member the people.of the Island s were on ly k ept down by thesword. He would just make ome awe. fur what he had advanced; but none such appeared ment to the House, and then l eave it t o d ec id e upon at present., The duties of those situations must not be neglected ; and by whom, if taken from the the truth of that assertion. Corfu was at pre s e n t gar- Agents, could they - be performed? He would state risoned by eight hunched men ; whereas, when in pos. before that House, that it was impossible for any one session cl the French, and i n t i me o f war , if conta i tod -in his department to undertake them. If the Hon. twelve thousand troops. Th es e so ldi ers , too, were all Gentleman brought' a motion forward on this sub. stationed in the works, and there w e re none quartered upon the country. Would the Hon Member say.that jest, he would prove the fact—he would shew that the business of that department had already been it was possible for the whole p o p u l at i on , if they were doubled and trebled, and he would defy the Hon. really discontented, to be put d o wn by suc h a propos. tion of force? In .Cephalonia the number of m en ca . 'Gentleman to contradict him. While on his legs he able of bearing arms was . 25,000. ; an d the English would offer a few words in reply to a charge made P troops stationed there 500. In Sa n t a Maum thee the other evening against the Governor of Upper 'were 15,1000 inhabitants of that descripti on , an d 550 Canada. On hearing it he had risen in his place, and declared himself satisfied that the fact referred to English. In Ithaca and the ot h er i s l an d s t h ere was was untrue. But now having had time to make in- the same disproportion. It wa s imp oss ibl e , t h ere f ore , quirt', he would challenge the Hon. Gentleman to that the Hon. Member co u ld m a i n t ain his proposition :shew ,that a more unfounded statement had ever Without giving a very bad o pi n i on o f t h e islandets /been brought forward in or out of that House. The whom be meant to advocate and support. Butahe Hon. Member would say, the population had be en teroverhor had been described to have sent a Mr. Gourley " a much injured Gentleman"out of the Pro- dilarmed ; and allowing that to be th e case , t h e corn. ' .paristive numbers of the En g li s h w ere so f ew t h at t h ey vince, under circumstances of great hardship and op_ ce. pression. This was said to have occurred in•con s e. could not put down the i n h a bit an t s by p h ys i ca l f or quence of Mr. Gourlay having published that the Lie would also refer the Hou s e to th e accounts o f t h e late elections. He did no t k n o w w h et h er i t was i s Governor, after having consented to receive i certain one of the Hon. :11ernber's speeches, but it h a d hen salary in lieu of fees formerly. allowed, not only re stated either there or in th ose remar k s by which the 'ceived the salary stipulated, but the fees also. N ow the' fact was, there was not a word of any such acc u - flion.Membei's speeches were p rece d e d an d succee d e d elsewhere, that the inhabit a nt s w er e so di sgu sni i sation in the three volumes which had be en p r i n t e d, with the administratio n of the Government, as ts on matters Connected*With`thecise.. After this, what lake no interest whatever in the electi ons , an d i s became of the charge which the Hon. Gentlem an h a d brought forward, when it aptieared that the a ccusa - the privileges and ri g ht s w hi c h t h ey possesse d . don for which Mr. Gourlay was sent out of the P ro - —ln Corfu the tide t o vote cons i ste d i n t h e pas vince, as stated by the Hon. Gentlema n w h o was - session of property amo unt i ng i n E ng li s h money to about - £7O or £BO a -y ear . O ut o f 520 e l ectors t h is - shortly to bring his case forward, did not. appe a r eve, to have been made? The Hon. Membe r ou gh t qualified, 462 Voted at th e l ast e l ect i on; an d t hi s nit to be more cautious in making such charge s ; It w as secretly, but viva voce, and in p u bli c . I n Ceplialonir Artie they could be contradicted, but in the mean there were 530 electori, and 367 o f t h em vote d ; a Z time.fhey were translated into other langua g e s , an dante 340, and 201 voted ; in Sa n t a M auro 273 vote d 'widely circulated, to the great injury of indi v id ua l out of 341 ; in Ithaca, 127 ou t o f 138 ; an d i n t ie smaller islands all voted wh o h a d t h e right. Now it character. On another subject the stateme n t a d. lioneed by th% Hon. Gentleman was utterly unfounded would ask the House wheth er t h ese cou ld b e Of greater proof of the confidence they placed i n the - T he.alluded to the lonian Islands. He defied th e n. Hon. Gentleman to bring forward a moti o n o n thi s English Government, an d o f t h e va l ue w hi c h t h ey eat. If he suktacned to their privile g e s ? Y et - th e H on . M em b er h a { j 'did so it woold enable hint to prove the assertion he now made, on documents, the au- said, that the people took no interest whatever i i thenticity of which he could not deny. The Hon. public affairs, and never came f orwar d there • . Gentleman had stated, the lonian Islands we r e ne t political advantages. Another „prosperous. He (Mr. Wilmot) could not go into the of the Government wa s t o be' details while speaking on a question to which they Corfu, without fresh t axa : were irrelevant, but he could confidently tell the Hon. the failure of the vinta g e Gentleman, that what he had asserted with 'respect creased its revenue one seve n th to them, as well as his statements respecting Upper Throughout the Government - Canada, were utterly unfounded. tice was better pre s er v ed, - Mr. CREEVEY objected to the agencies on other was better carried on in all rer grounds, as well as those his Hon. F r ie n d h a d a d- e had been at any prey', vanced. *Three of those agents, Mr. Huslcissen, Mr. the acts of tyranny of which he Courtney,' and Mr.'Bathurst, were Membe rs of th e should always .be re a dy ' House, which, in his opinion, ought not to be ; and, banishment of those persons -' indeed, under the - Statute of Queen Anne they could was fully justified. But not be. Tree, these places were not given by th e and not one native•olahe Crown, but they were given by the Secretary of under banishment. Sir ' State for the time being, which was the same thing. the necessary force and After the Holidays he•would bring forward a motion trationof the new Government on the subject. tions had entitled him to Sir-1. - YORKE thought these agents, might be dis- the most undeniable proof peosed with, and he shotdd accordingly vote for the theprosperous condition seduction, on the same principle as he voted for the vented; but if the Hon. _ reduction of the Postmaster-General and .the Lords' not satisfied with. that proof, of, the Admiralty. 'upon closer_grptind, he was Mr'. lILISICISSON defended the 'ipp - ointment of whatever papers he might Agents to the Colonies as necessary ; and contended sary for such a purpose—Wl that although, in the vote of Army Extraordinaries, Mr. H. G. BENNET ;,--' 'yet 'they' were in fact paid by the Colonies. The man had forgotten that , Hon. Gentleman, upon the same principle, might kept in. the lonian Islands, deny that any Army Extraordinaries were necessary, Islands from being taker and therefore he should, instead of moving a miser- 2,000 men were sufficient able paltry reduction of £2,900, at once oppose the subjection, if we began, vote altogether." log the population. He Ur. T.WILSON thought the Colonies 'should pay Thomas iquitlaad had ink, e Ageattivho were appointed to promote their in- the English name - unpoptst terests, and ahit they ought not, in any way, to -be it was before revered. 'T made a . ihurce.of expense to the country. . Colonial Secretary, who Sir ILWiLSON'w.ished to have an answer as to so to do; but they would the qttestion Of'Prize.money. Had ,the Government pe r so ns in the lobby. now *tiled the.Prite-strottei di had they not? Mr. PEEL said,. the : far.',AßßUTHNOrtirld, the money had been paid Member for Aberdeea, h; bylloieristneot sonie_tinier, , and been in the hands . of Sir Thomas Maitland, wl eht , .A.speats. . . . quire his dismissal from Mr..WlClßAMEakfeitded the claim • set .op by' the a pply the terms ~ s courge, A . pt - India Ctartpkti t y:-Mellonse divided —: •- .. For the V(nria '"• ' "L ".' -.1. . - • - • • • . 74 at a distance, incapable of grace to die British nation, ... - ;.or the ArcAndaspss . ... ...:• • ..,,... 4 3 ' ' . ed "ii i an arduous sem,— . • .-y, IZlajaticr: krianut ottitt origin a l tote, . -ist 41i. - HUMX, in riamito, put a,ciestiOe.relitivi gag sio . the contracts f.r.w. clotting,..alluded to the previous .. molly in having this opportunit y to the merits. of Sir T/T , . -- • discussion,. and said that he always wishedaolae'liold °Rice P' va•- responsible for whateve r chat ges,ainl statements •11.. a hip the - office for two Governor of .' made. With regard to the ...t4c of Sir l'cre,,iitis; about Pit' wilm°o a " 0 wet saw. FirO of .hon tHoor, hoar, mar abje F ferred ogitir w be u' our result to the Lord A. were more land. He v was LO be. al .cially iO the . tented, to ter he defied th 4 lay what the was? The I leave off his .!sentence on scions sentenc Au the Gove, Vie charge the conduct by Governm Mr. PEEL t sing persoi scourge and Mr. WYN this kind, to which could specific rnotic wet. It was Officer a sca against the bring forward land, and the' swer was to I] Colonel DJ Hon. Friend c -fore. It was Friend had m them distinct Mr. WILM ply the Roust jest, and to sh falsehood, of t The Itesolut Upon the gi National Vacc Mr. HUM E _,State for the 1 :shat he would .:once for all, to charges again openly made i by authentic di duct. As the :tent of Marti sideted it unjui Mr. DAWSI Vaccine Establ the welfare of 90b000 persons 2.0,000 at Ma `Board had the all parts of the Mr. WILM( from what had wards the poop Sir I. COFI ployed on fore and a tyrant. Mr. FIUME brought before words which b agreed to. Mr. lIUME were taken by ;reign Officers, in other armies Sir U. .BUR( that they receiv could receive h The rest of tl Levlt "ettihufatture q _.ICS '. Q W~l Cher 14155K11 literroa el* op' taboure tik 'Burt etabatti otet • came forward to .enjoy that Upon the me inother proof of the goodats man, Mr. to be found in the fact, tha - -the Beer Dirties ration, and notwithstanclixt Mr. HOLM! ge and olive crops, had ar arise out Hof the -seventh within the last yea • which might :be ment of Sir T. Maitland, jeS* ; seine assembled d, and the civil governmes 'The 'CRAtiTC all its deparunents than they be believed ther evious time. With regard st '. • Mr. 111.1StiCIJ hich the Hon. Member spa; ' - • -be taken to aura ready to maintain that tit !i •* Jd onoura bl e m e rsons who signed the Petitial .i Wk. Alcierma they had now been recAdt ' -sure was a t a x s ie islands was at this monies - Mr.Alsierrea rT. Maitland had onlinsa ' -mks, as ise itbeu firmness which the admit* to get mas k jicitt rnment required, and his each •ihiro BIM/41E' ) the highest .praise. In bat i ,, - isdeed e stud die iof of this was to be foetal is svoniti hold out lof the country which he r : the btiesving. 1 1. Member•for Aberdeen W the sisty en be. roof, and visited to meet his ' beer should bee was perfectly ready to grzi • ve.it 4he labours ;ht demand that were Peas' Dm CMANC —(F-lear, near, hear). : Mot btifeiti *it i iiid the Honourable Gentle '° ftWtst Nu t; bat t the 12,1;X:10 French :oldie it *fair trial. ds, were there to preservetis Mr. GRATT. ten by us. Such less thsi be extended to 1 nt to keep those Islands aco - The CR mac as we had done, by disarm :e had always heard that Sp_ .zi .- th ,. ite rr . "al l. istoc HAv 4 et oi ngeniously contrived to am! .. .., ~,,_. F. wovii pater in these I s lands, . .'szr . -, .-, umttihttfatteste This was denied by ) had a general retaining I . .... 1 : 1 6 6 . 1 ,Z t - B b U iti rl itti d hair the'contrary ( " gni . 4 *Pitdr eitubvrtl of ties Honourable Gentleman, du tittl.tell had brought charges ag - 4 1 , Au beett ' L LIVre, L i ter! vhich, if borne .out, would • •.7 d ue vg" i the service. Was. it fait *Sitar...it 1 • "...4L lilV ir: ltt li i r l CA t ßl urge," 44 tyrant," and ____,‘ 4 ion," to an honourable OW , i . A i ... r. -4... vase tterani of llefendiniliimseasi au". •. „at : was =fait service? He was extra/ . ._. )pportunity, of. bearing d lt • so lrat l 4 A al , proObsed an Sir Thoinas Maitland. • .. . E,,Cyloo when 4e.01F. -- ear 1 6 a 11 , :. Jar g ttuf years wjucla j'iisll4 l . . 'illicit% a certain' wi fritaxtwurthilk; at. • • iti H ., r. t*.i../EISS