Star. — London, England, 1817-02-26 00:00:00

PdkLLIMFSI'4RY PRUCEkLINGS. 1101.13 R OF LORDS, F2I3RUARY 25.. Comae and Evidence were •heard upon OweWs Mom BIM "'unbar proceeding, weripti.tponeil, to anisetrence of au ca bm fr .nt the Detepthmt fife a Writ of Error. ills Rail of LAUPERDA LE moved for a return of all Mon created, eitabli.hed, ur regulated, wi• bin a certain period. Ordered. The Malta Trade dill went through a Committee, and the Report was received.' • -•-• Mr. I ;mime-row. and others front • i tho Coalman'. brought up the Mai Duty bill; which was read Ttra L tivite.—Adjourned PROTEST 1 • • I" ACSAIrisT Tar SILL PUS ausraiataa Till !lasts* calms. Disarmmar—Became it does not appg4r to in 'hat e in di Repurt-of the see'et Committee4ilitte has been silted such a yese linnitount and pressing anger, es may not be sufiftently provided against by site possivi. of the sspeutive Government under the est.teng Law., aqui as requires the Suspension of the most Important Decurit7 of thel4berty of the Country. • eueustos 'squeegee, OPTS. 111DfoRD. wILLTSLET• A Lap mar Lt. TNANKT. TOL. , T. DIOSTINDI. SUNORIOnT. AUCKLAND. ALTA NIA T. ST.IOIII. Sal T. SAT and SILL. ISSSIL. • • lOSSLT N. LAUDERDA LS. TASSALL NOLLAND. HOUSE OF COMMONS. • ' Lard LASCELLI..3 have notiee, that be would, on Monday nest, stove for lease to bring in a Bill to reader the Proprietors of Lead Mine* subject so the Posts Rates. Mr. 1.0 •SIINGI*ON nomed, that • there be laid before the Newts tenon of the rrodu:e of the Revenue of Recite for ONO :mouth, ea ling the Sib of F. Imlay, ISIS, the Sib oi February, 3516, said toe Si, of February, 1817, • shrwlag the Produce olds War Malt Duties, as distinguished frons the others. 1 he Returns were leiriediately laid on the Table, and ordered to bs printed. . _ . . . • PETITIMIII. &C. Mr. Serjeant ONSLOW presented a , petition, Signed by upwards of 2000 licensed Victuallers of the City of .London and its vicinity, complaining of the existirg laws respecting the mode of granting licenses. He understood that an Honourable Member (Mr. Bennett) intended to move for the appointment of a Committee to inquire into this subject, and if such were appointed., he rronld move to have thii petition referred to it. The petition being read, Mr. BARCLAY expressed his :satisfaction at teeing this subject brought before the attention of the House, as the powers of the. Magistrates ought to be In we particularly debued.—Trie petition was ordered to lie on the table. - . Mr. COURTEN AY brought in a Bill for regn. . 'Wing the application of money raised li OrShd Jo. ties in Ireland. The Bill waS:reid a st . . thifi. and! ordered for a second time en tbyrsday! it* weeks. ,*, Sir W. GEARY presented i atnion frothlte in habitants of Feiressham, in fatour c ASl Parliamentary Reform. L.id on the table. Mr. ;.tHAW presented petitions from several pa .. rishesin Dublin, praying for a repeal of the Window Tax. The Honourable Member at the same ti .. gave notice,' that he would, soon after the Easter recess, call the attention of the House'to these peti tions, by movii.g for a Committee to inquire into the Sate of the Window Tax and Coach Duties. The petitions were laid on the table. 'Mr. LUSHINGTON brought i in a 1341 to envied an Act of the 43.1 of the King, relative to the Ccn veyante of Passengers in, Foreign Vessels. The. Bill ' was read a 6rat time, and ordered to be caul a second time to-morrow. Lund STANLEY presented petitions from the int. habitants of Clitheroe and Royston. in favourof Par liamentary ItetOint, and a diminution of.tatatien.-- Thi Noble Lord ilsu presented a petition from the inhabitants of the pariah of Leigh, ut.faeour of a Re lator' in Parliament. This petition was fermiy pre sented by a NY..le Lord (Cochrane), but was refused by the Hotter. breams' no signatures had been af. Seed t.i the same paper with the petition itself. It did not piiini cot any time for the duration of Perlin- Mint, but. the Noble Lord Stated hit belief that the disks of shroud Parliaments. eras generally previlent *Moog the Reformers of Lancashire...4:lle Noble -Lord also presented a petition froth the same place, against the. introduction of any Laws for'llspending or firterruptingthe.liberty of the pfopl& . 'A staged that in thkt town, there were no Stienceant, or any "Ma held their nonsense—(e lepyfi) ? -06leppetpsed 3, persuasion that the present lanhvisrete adequate ‘o o we the safety and tranqiiillityff.thectOontryt "The petitions were severally laid on Ws table, . 4,. .. Lord MILTON suggested to an - . Honaurable Friend of his (Mr. Bennett). the propriety of post. posing to a bake day his Motion that; stood for to morrovr, it being desirable to have the undivided .ass a da n . of the Howe directed to the important 'imonseses , affecting the liberty and safety of the country. , • ~ . . Mr. BENNETT acquiesced in the suggestion, for _however impakapt may have been the nature of his , motios, it should yield to one on which the liberty or slavery. of the vziettwy depended. He then put off his motion till seined ills 6th of March. Mr. SHAW mowed lee .a Copy of any Report , made to tire ItisisOotternment, by theCommissiossers et Paving in the City of Dublin, Melte to Lighting the Suede wide Gas...-Ordered. , . . IOSIIIGII WINS. • . • . , • Mt'.. SHARP'S . preseited a ßetide 'bons the Ito. . =and Dealers 'in-Foreign Wine' lease City of a, complaining of the great deettert of their tawdry, in consequence of the heavy Teton Wines, and of the neglect which their Petition ecperioneed in the last Session of Parliament. lt staved that this decrease of trade- WifllOt Drily a loss to themselves, but also as injiity to the retinue,. and that the iiimi ilutiost of the tooporidutY daring the last year, in the :run of London aloft. amoulocd to 1 0 38 . 01 1 0. '.The.Petition being read,' .. , ' Slr.-SHARPE observed, 'that if Welders did not turn theirfattilnioo to this stsbject i • he Mould hells • bistdoty_to bring k immediately Wore the floosie. tatiod * the House. It was a *object Invalabig dm unly ankh individoal distress, but alio a socials Slit i t , g m , Truliativy i but he believed it to be onlY•iine AlitiltlCE . among _many, of tbo-inteilhe t t a isemt. firm& by tire mistakes end iymirmatsgwv o y• and one proof more of the - netesal o r width , tam* efteislation...—ClieePAree; : ti • , .7iTifi • Mn. WARE- observed, ib le - dilititightPti lon g b e e s pouting between iltrtirldsh audsPittitt: gunk Governments. respecting two Ankles ...i n th e - Treaty of 1810. 'He Understood that two • points had been pressed by' the Shish Govemateat—.either Ott rev of the two Miklos. et, . annulling Of the whole Tree', and forMation second. He r.quesild to be iliforFood b 7 . i lArti oPP O -: . 'site, whether the P!irtuguese Government concurred in either of iheae *ors.? • Lprd CASTLEREAGH replied, that the qua !ion was one which he found it difficult to answer in the moment, is consequence of the complicated na ture of the negotiations. He could, however, state, that no progress had been as yet made toward; mak ing any alteration in the existing nasty. Mr. SHARPE expressed a hope, that the Otan cellor of the Exchequer would have the kindness to give an early notice of ally intention be might form relative t 2 the Wine Duties. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, he had never conceived that the prayer of thr l Petitioners should be acceded to. If any rumour had gone abroad of its having been the intention of Government to diminish the duties on wine, it was altogether without his concurrence, and, for his own part, he could not think, in the present circum stances of the country, of destroying such a. source of revenue. Mr. I'ONSONBY was surprised that any rumour could have gone Abroad of any intention on the part of Ministers to reduce the amount of taxation, as such a measure was altogether hostile to their sys tem. It might, indeed, have been thought that the Right Hon. Gentleman would have desired to have collected an improving revenue, instbad of experi encing a.diminution in the port of London alone of £338.000 I and he was convinced, that whin the returns throughout the eotire empire would be exa mined, the loss in every part would be found propor tionably great. This was the more remarkable, as the wine duties had not long since been considerably, ihcteased, and exemplified whAt had been-said by Swift, that in the arithmetic of revenue, " one and one did not alwayi mike two." The reduction afforded a convincing proof of the inability of the higher classes of society to consume as much wine as they usectto do, and of the country at large to support*the present expenditure. Sir JOHN NEWPORT stated, that the wine duties in Wand had:increased since 1802, in the, proportion of froartwo to five ; while the produce of that branch of revenue was lait year less by 4201 1 ,000 'than in I 803: Sir M. W. R,IDLEY said, that he had that morn ing received a letter from one of his ionsiituents, re4uesting him to4uppOrt this Petition to Parliament, and stating that in the town he had the honour to re present, the wine trade had decreased one-half. The Petition was then laid on the'iable. Mr. H. MARTINgsve notice he would,on Mon day. move for leave to bring in a Bill For expediting the proceedings in causes pending in tbst Court of Exchequer. eusrPsnoit 07 TIM HABILAI COMM& • A Message from the Lords informed the House that the Lords had passed a Bill, entitled I , An Act to empower his Majesty to. secure and detain such persons as may be suspected of conspiring against bis Majesty's. Person and Government." . After a short conversation respecting the most con venient day for discussing the Bill, Lord Conzaeacm gave notice that he would move the firsi,reading of it to-morrow. . Mr. CALVERT presented a Petition from the Borough of Southwark in favour of Retrenchment and a Reform ih Parliament. Mr. BARCLAY expressed his deterMination to promote, as tar as in him lay, retrenchment and ice. nomy ; and with respect to a Reform in Parliament, he conceived it to some extent, but alter the most deliberate coast ratios of the subject, he had seen no plan as yet proposed. in which he could altogether conc u r. As to triennial Parliaments, he thought that no advantage could be derived from them, and that howitver specious they may appear in thearysehey wets in !Titmice injurious or delusave. Mr. Serjesnt ONSLOW was very willing to pro. mote economy and retrenchment in the public ex penditure, but he had seen no plan of Reform more conducive to liberty than the present form of the Con stitution..ThiPetition was then laid on the table. • Mr. SPIERS presented* Petition from the "Burgh of Renfrew ; and Mr: Arum WaJOHT one from the, City of Geoid, in favour of Rettedchinent and Re form.—Laid on the table. o' Sir RONALD FERGUSSON presented a Pea tins, praying the Reform. from the Inhabitants of the town of Dysart.—.Laid on the table. Mr. BENNETT also presented a Petition, as the same subject, lrom eh. town of Church Stratton, in Shropshire, trhieh was ordered to lie on th e t a bl e .— He reprobated, in very severe terms, the calumny against.tbe public character of tho country at large, contained in the Report of the Secret Committee. It had chargid the country generally with disaffection, yet in this very county (Shropshire), with whose dis tress and numerous privations he was particularly well acquainted, the patience tad forbearance with which they had been borne, entitled them to the praise of discretion and loyalty. PETITION or TNst WOITMINSTER MEETING. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT presented a Petition from the Inhabitants of Westminster against the Sus pension of the Habeas Corpus Act, and hoped, if Misters should desist from their attempt t• pass this measure with indecent hurry,, it would be followed up by others from all parts of the country. Lord COCHRANE . applauded the generally de *conies conduct of the cameos of Wesmuoster in their public Meetitigs ; it was, in paw, a refutation of the calonsaies contained in the Report. He never should be intimidated front attendiagthose, or any other public meetings, baying for their object tuformetioa and retrenchment, by terror of chains, imprisonment, or the censers of those whose a'vpwed object it was to curb the free spirit of ati injured and insulted nation. Mr. LONG WELLY -4 .1T bad himself witnessed the progress of alarm in the best-informed Societiet. and wished his Majesty's Ministers and tbeiaouse to encourage counter-petitions from the wellaffected, with a view to con et the pernicious influence of the agitators. Sir FRANCIS B'URDETT hoped that the Oen diennen of Eaglia4 would come forwartkat the pre; .pent-crisis to direit and regulate she publierdelibers time end.amociations as they had done io England's best day& colaPerell the apathy hi the meat day to the conduct of the first-rite characters in Spin daring the late contest, who; whilst their gentry was Toughs fur by hostile armies, yield e d a Whet obedience to each prevailing force in succession. Mr. ROBINSON thought the tOdiprisoa lan-1 founded, and haunted " that the prcvalence of the 'new ;famines had .sgstorhed And brpken•asunder the bkiods of society. • •. • Sir GILBERT HEATHCOTE .defended the Br: Baronet in bringing a charge of supineness against the resident Country Gentlemen. Mr. GURNEY had great hopes the suspensioS of the Habeas Corpus would quiet the public mind, and confound the agitators. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT thought it probable his hopes would be so far realized as that the Act would be passed. He alluded to an expression of a Noble Lord (Castlereagh) last night, denomiustingi the lower orders of people as the a degraded ranks." He felt it incumbent upon him to protest against any such distinction amongst Englishmen. There• were the privileged orders, and all beside were fellow. , citisens, whose lives, liberties, and properties, were' equally the object of the Legislature's care. He did, however, know a particular class of men in and out of that House, the Sinecurist, the Placeman, and the Pensioner, who might be denominated the only and truly degraded rank in the country—(!fear, hear.) Lord CASTLEREAGH explained, that he had described the treason as having effected that degra dation in a certain class, which in all other cases he professed himself desirous to treat with respect and attention. It was always particularly entitled to the, high consideration and immediate protection of the House of Commons—(Hear, hear.) Mr. COXE thought the convening public meetings by the Gentry would tend to no good purpose. Mr. G. PONSONBY replied to the charge made by the Noble Lord, that the Report of the Committee was a libefragainst the country. No such charge as, that complained of had been made against the public in general ; he had assented to that Report, because it expressly bad charged a particular part of the people, overwhelmed with distresses and sufferings no doubt, with listening with too favourable an e•r to the suggestions of agitators. Lord POLKSTONE could not help thinking that to be a libel on the people generally, which was now adduced as the sole ground for suspending the Ha beas Corpus, passing a Gagging Bill, and other des potic and unwarrantable measures. Mr. LAW contended, that the higher class, the middle class, and the agricultural class, were almost ge nerally excepted from the charges alleged in the report. Mr. BROVGHAM said, that the words a fee if any of the higher Ueda'," in the Report, meantsome of the higher ranks also. The whole Report resew:- , bled, nOt a bill of indictment against the grople of England, but a sentence of condemnation with • proof or trial. After a few words from Mr. Eunirr, in explana tion, the Petition was read, and laid on the table. Sir FRANCIS BURDETT presented a Petition from the parish of Aruhold, in the county of Not tingham', praying for Reform, Annual Parliaments, and universal suffrage.— Read and laid on the table. Mr. BENNETT presented a Petition for Reform from the Town of Chnrch Stratton, in Shropshire,' which. were read. and ordered to lie upon the table. ' RIMIER OP Till LORDS OF Tilt ADMIRALTY. Sir M. W. RIDLEY moved, that an humble Address be presented to the Prince Regent, request ing him that he would be pleased to order a reduc tion in the number of the Lords Commissioners of the Admiralty. It was his intention it should be so framed, as to leave to his gracioua consideration and option the extent of the reduction.. If his suggestion were adopted. the number should not exc e ed four temrnissioniers, including the senior Commissioner. A great oldie feeling had neinifested itself through out the country, recommending retrenchment. For this reason it would have. been fortuiste had the pie. sent motion originated with the Ministry---.(How).—, It was not to the abolition of sinecures that the peo., pie looked op with confident hope of relief. He. for •one, did not agree in the propriety of redocing'ell sinecures : nor did he think that the great and effi. eient public Offices of the. Crown were sofficiently well paid. Their responsibilities were great; and there w a s a very heavy personal expense entailed 'span them from the very nature of their situations., There cotiid, therefore, it no attempt made, with, justice, to reduce the salaries of this class of puhlic men. In the Marl, part of the history of this cebasien s England bad nothing. that could be called a.."itley. There was no arsenal, no dock-yard , non* b t insel establishments necessary for a great maribirrie . win, OUT Wiry consived of but a few vessels fitted 'obi by the Cinque Portal and;' its time of war, ship; were borrowed from &Britian st i tch In the . reign of Henry the Eighth, an improvement took place, and a Navy Beard and a Board of Admiralty, were appointed, and dock-yards were twined.— A code of regulations was Then drawn up, which re mained until the reign of Edward VI. and, with dif ferent alterations, until that of Charles I. In that I reign Commissioners were appointed by 'both Houses lof Parliiment to investigate the 'fairs Of the Navy. The Commissioners, appointed in 1645 and .trb49, I consisted of three persons, tiho received (what would, doobtless appear to the Gentlemen now in office a very inadequate recottipeostej—rArre shilliav dr•day., for their services—VlNO.) The troubles in whi t i 1 the reign of Cbades was involved, occas i one d, _the,, Navy to be neglected ; and it was in a state aeon). parative insignificaace, even compared with former days. when Croiswell came into power. It was then increased considerably—dock-yerds were formed, and the necessary stores were provided ; but during the. short adadoisdation of his son it again fell into de. cay. When Charles 11. came to the Throne, the Duke of York was appointed Lord High Admiral, and from that time the growth of the Navy might be dated. He called to his assistance Mr. Secretary Pe lla, who deemed 'it necessary to procure the aid of persons well skilled in every branch of nautical affairs. Every inquiry was made by him, throughout Eng kad, for properly qualified persons—merit alone—a perfect knowledge of the business they were to be en timed in—was looked to, instead of Parliamentary influence 'and Court favour, as the passports !.0 ea. ; piayment. Amongst others, air Aathpay ne t * ship-builder of great eminence , was induciii.give. i . hla assistance. But the probes e made io hie igisttle business were surest, that it was necessary to'tta , detunify him aga inst e any lois be might s usta i n by devoting his tieste lad takats to the national service. ,Mr. Secretary. Pepys, and three others, then formed the Board of Commissioners, mai. proceeded- with get. can , and elution" to wale k over the affairs of navy. traM.whets Plivale.Cecele . wain. Lord High Maks% the 'livelier of ttiimaissioikets: was . • ' few ; Li IlfiCtlasse were five. In l; a 9, shy, Orford . was at diejleaclnf tl.e Board. the Con; ~ sinners were reduced to four. In 1714, 1717, 1 to come nearer our own times, in 177.5.• it . .- but five Commissioners. Since that time, cl l . re , .generally 4: Commissioners, and, in time t i w , undoubtedly the duties of the Board et Adrreed might demand the aid of six Coeimissiiin ee But, if those duties were decreased, it could fairly be held out as an argument, that, because one period six Commissioners were !mind necess. e .thert should, therefore, be always continued. wished, in making those observetions, ti. e u,,,11, .self against the suspicion of wishing to ca. t any :oval imputation on the Gentlemen who now c , posed the Admiralty Board; but tie was b tint: state, that their number was not consi-tent wiry i practice of former periods, and was not called I. , the present. In 1661. when Mr. Secretary l'e, called Sir Anthony Deane to the Admir.ii ) , stated the qualifications of • the persons see" ~,, selected to act with him at the Board. "'l'. cy ..vei he said, a. men having a practical knrvelt d, e ~1 works of the Navy, both at Boards and •t iii, ~ yards, general masters of accounts, liberal of . and of approved inngrity"i-ei(kear.) He c rtaii, would not insinuate that those who were iii.vi c., erected with the Admiralty were not men et in, grity; but he would ask, did they come up ti. e• description given by Mr. Secretary Pew, oe 0 aillitie: of his colleagues ? (hear, hear.) H e ~, not use many arguments to Frove that the Com, sinners of 1661 were appointed on a u IT teat p i _ ciple from those of the pres-nt day; he had , to remind the Hause„,tket Ministers had I solt..t . for a Cored of Horse, in older to make him at the Admiralty, and the tact was made pry c , elear.:-(Hear, hear.) Sum!) , this cicninsta.,c, of itself sufficient to prove that SIX Lord% tri .t,. miralty were unnecessary. The Hon. liAli.lo, support of his opinion, referred to the lt. peat , t Committee of Finance, of 1797, in which a redtet, of the number of Lords of the Admiral.y is rec, mended at the conclusion of peace. The time, contended, was come, when that reduction ought be carried into effect. In the sear 1797, we. it Report was drawn up, there were 147 WO s ~im embodied—there were now only 19,000. At e period there were WOO vessels, of 'airlift kinds. Conitalssion—at present there were only 2(X). Mot there wills such a reduction of duty, it was prepiete loirsAi say, that six Lords of the Admiralty, the Wurnbeithit acted during the war, were now called ter. Herterulted he had proved that there was a necessity for a reduction of these sinecure offices, tor so he cce siderird them, and he should now move— "'/'bat an humble Address be presented to his Royal Me t r e . the Prince Regent, representing to his Royal Hightsges th.: so Mapaty's faithful Commons, relying on toe graciois shrrisr: a of boa Royal Highness to make every reduction to our e,:atiii..... inane which tt•esatety of the Empire and sound pulley ail: e. low, humbly pray hie Royal Highness, that be will be pleee.: is J im directions that the Lords Coonotsaionere in the Ad,,nral Not reduced to such a number as the eatgruciea of the coma. It present serv!ce actually require" ' ' Lord CASTLEREAGH said, if the Honour; Baronet wished to devolve this question on hi jetty's Ministers for them to bring Forward, as he stated, he ought to have made himself acque' with their intentions—he ought to have waited ti determination of the Committee appointed to in , Ma the public expenditure, and learned their of: the subject, before he had himself proceede His Lordship deeply regretted the course now wed in elehoerations of Parliament —a cow. salictioned by their ordinary proceedings—nani See.rdacing on•the order book a number of isol 'notices, relative to offices under Government, bringing them forward without any general an' "ended view of the system of Governmente-by wl the House and the country were kept in a stat perpetual ferment, on the subject of public expenz Me. • Thir was not the mode pursued by Mr ee or Me. Pitt. Their propositions on the subj• economy; weer connected with a coMprebensi ce of the situation of the country. It such api it as that contend:d for by the Honourable Bit were once adoeted—the principle of allowing no laketioo to Gen:kitten in office—the priucsple of .giog imoiness done• by unremitting labour—then iembole system of policy would be changed; and f :11tatertn eetenuld find, in future, that offices in count, y would nut be filled by the same descrii s et meiotic/mils as they were now—(Nsor, hal) It would drive out of office those who were :not ;crested in giving sat:daction. The whole sal if all the offices, relative to which notice of mi had been given, were abolished, would not be than af4.000 or £5,000 per annum, if he cyce , the office of Third Secretary of Stare, the not 1 ltitive to which, given by a Right 1 ion. Genii 4hlr. Tierney) seemed to be put off sin. The Noble Lord defended the propriety of hart Air proportion of civil talent at the Admiralty L. L ln his opinion, it would be erroneous to suffer pr sional men (for whom he had the highest respti out-number those who had been educated in employments. Professional talents should he c . in to aid civil ability, and not overshadow it. neat adverted to the necessity of keeping lir , at ber of offices of this kind, where men might pi ally become acquainted with the business of Go' ment. until they were fitted to undertake the '* situations. In such schools .it was that Sir Re Walpole. Mr. Fox, and other great men, first stns the practical parts of Government. With rogue chaise:lnes. part of the question, he argued, th.r idiots investigation et. the details of the 4.l:ee dock-yards (which could.not be so strictly lock' in time of war),. afforded full employment :, Lords of the Admiralty-ethree of whom wee pied at the out.ports, whilst three sat as a Box I Londttn. The greatest mischief would flow altering this system. The Noble Lord prom& argue, that Ministers left the strongest desire Er we every possible economical arrangenutet—al itiosidto the Finance Committee—and to %talkie was not appointed with any mister vie ado* question of economy—he stated, that fladiocoote to a determination to recommend ebolitioo of all sinecure places, after the present . rest had expired. It was better to sacrifice this n: , tat rewarding services, since it had become s'' ' obnoxious—but other means must ,be provides enable his Majesty to remunerate those who li Deserted well of the State. His Lordship cc iv by seeing " the previous question:' .- Lord ALTHORPE contended that the able i- • r b • } in) • re 1 I w Dad: Id Ft, Lute I Lt essdr H H type it c•,nt C Illy t it') OA SI r Pei st 1 1• yl ► e It tr wet E, lit t , ./ C nt.thl c., 1 e to- t'• ti If 111 • ere stmi t' jr it At tl •1 11. L.tt • ct y es. t nom tr, It cl ght tt II tit •ttnt • t thit iG Wilts c' 141 eta IS thinral:r 'tar: zr.J • our a rs he Imi C. ts I tnr the in quite :r iv: tt al na For- mese not I iarntly, d iSadvd 2 Ilt, and tl and et- r which state if 7 I pet?.. Lucia C re view a incif.e 3strehl • no re. ot get. hen tl.e d in ti..l ript.l . car.)— uOSI savine. • a moV:°. emr ricer!. tes s • I:lesr,2l die. svinp s Li ;r d. prom a.ct) in cav3 ca::.:d r. pradt. ;oven• i emit RoLert rar.! *2*.e •kej te :o ele e (•CCU+ )214.1 in r ft, sn ;dal , •and I:: • Jiro , ; rieW st 1 d It $L • mcie 0 %try led ' I •