Star. — London, England, 1823-05-03 00:00:00

I ~~~ ... _ ; - t'" • Clerk of the Crown in Ireland was the same who held it in the year 1811, because to two persons must the case have been known ex ficces.sitate rei; and if so, he should call upon the House to say how such cundnct had served the Right Hon. Gentleman in the dis charge of his duty? If Mr. S twin had not commu nicated to the Attorney-General the knowledge of that fact, he had acted with at least .a want of cow.- . tesy, ioleavinglhe discovery oFthe - case to accident. Mr. PLUNKETT said the office of Crown Solici t.lr in Ireland was served bytwo persons, a father and con (Thomas and William Kern mis) the fa:her was now dead, and he thought it probable that the son, who was a young man, might be ignorant of, or might not have remembered the ca.,e. Sir .1. NEWPORT said, the Gentlennao (Mr. W., Keinrnis) had couducted the business of the office. for his father at the period in question, and must there fore be deemed competent to recollect the case, and if so, was inexcusable. Ale was joined with his father in the patent by which the place was held, and must have been cognizant of the fact. It was, therefore, inexcusable in him to have withheld from the 'Right llonourab:e Gentleman that fact which it was his bounden duty to have revealed. Mr. GRATTAN thought, that both the Crown So licitor and the late Attorney-General for Ireland, should be ordered to attend at the BAT of the House. Sir N. COLTHURST suggested, that the case might have escaped the recollection of the Crown Solicitor, as it had escaped that of the Right Ho nourable Gentleman himself. Colonel BARRY rose to move an Amendment to the motion of the Honourable Member for Limerick, to add the name of the Crown Solicitor in Ireland to the number of witnesses whose attendance on the House• was moved for. He knew nothing of Mr. Kemmis, but thought it only fair that he should be summoned in order to defend himself. Ile should therefore move, " That William Kemmis be added to the number of witnesses moved for, namely, Dil lon M4l 4 lamara, and Terence O'Reilly, and that he do so attend on Friday, the 9th of May." Mr. CALCRAFT moved; that the name of the Right Hon. William Saurin, his Majesty's late Attor ney-General for Ireland, should also be added. Mr. GOULBURN was uncertain whether he knew Mr. W. Kemmis or not ; but he begged to remind the House what was the real object of the inquiry, namely, into the conduct of the High Sheriff of Dublin,; in the course of which much of an unplea sant nature to the individuals mentioned might be thrown out; and , it was for the House to consider whether the examination of those individuals could throw any light upon the inquiry. He seized that opportunity to object, that it was unfair of the Ho nourable Gentlemen to make that inquiry a pretext for 'summoning before the House individuals from different parts of Ireland, and to examine them upon topics other than that immediately the subject of in quiry. It was not Mr. W. Kemmis merely who was called on to attend before the House , but also the late Attorney-General for Ireland; and the only ob jects of which were to know from themselves, first, whether or not they were cognisant of a certain case; and, secondly, why they had suffered it to escape their recollection. Mr. CALCRAFT, from what had fallen from the Right Hon. Gentleman, had bo objection to with dravlhis motion for the attendance of Mr. Saurin, if that for the attendance of Mr. Kemmis was also. Mr. Secretary PEEL begged leave to mention two circumstances respecting Mr. Kemmis, connected with the very important fact mentioned by his Right Hon. Friend ; the first was, that a Gentleman of the Bar, Mr. Townsend, who in conducting the late pro seintion had been associated with his Right Hon. Friend (Mr. Plunkett), had also, in the year 1811, been employed for the Crown in the case mentioned. The second was, that the present Chief Justice of the King's Bench in Ireland (Bushe) had been Solicitor- General there in 1811 ; consequently had knowledge of the case, and yet that learned individual, before whom, in his capacity of Chef Justice of the King's Bench in Ireland, the late trials had taken place, had also completely forgotten the fact. Had Mr. Towns. end or Chief Justice Bushe recollected that precedent they would no doubt have mentioned it at the trial ; and, if it had escaped their recollection, it was only fair to suppose that Mr. Kemmis had equally forgotten it.—( Hear, hear). Colonel BARRY, in consequence of what had fallen from his Right lion. Friend, would consent to withdraw his motion, which he had made only on account of the individual himself who was the object of it. It appeared to him, from the number of wit nesses called for, that the object and extent of the proposed inquiry were indefinite, in which case he and hrs. friends were justified in being fully prepared to meet them, by calling for the attendance of any 'parties who they might deem necessary. With the leave of the House he would withdraw his motion.— The motion was accordingly withdrawn. UNDER SUCRIFF OF DUBLIN. The SPEAKER acquainted the House, that be had received a letter from the Under Sheriff of Dublin, who bad been ordered to attend the House on that day. The Right Hon. Gentleman proceeded to read the letter, which stated that the Under Sheriff's ab sence from Dublin would be attended with the total suspension of public. business as connected with the Bbetiff's Office, the execution of writs, the impanel ling of Juries, aces b also stated that the Under Sheriff was authorised .by• Barons M , Clelland and Vandeleur to declare, that in the event of his depar- I tare they should be under the necessity of adjourning' the Commission over which they presided. Sir J. NEWPORT observed, that the difficulty might be obviated by the appointment of a second Sub-Sheriff. If the Sheriff had two Under S:ret iffs, one of them might attend at the Bar of the House, while tbe other discharged the duties of the office at Dublin. Mr. GOUbBURN said, that when the House or dered the attendance of the Sub-Sheriff of Dublin at their Bar, apprehending that some inconvenience might result from the occurrence, in consequence of the Commission sitting in Dublin, he had written to Dublin to desire that, before the Sub-Sheriff left Ire land. a Deputy should be appointed to perform his duty in his absence. In the answer which lie had re• ceived to his letter the reasons why that could not be done acre stated. They were as follows :—When the Sheriffs appointed a Deputy, it was always jointly ; tuna ot the Sheriffs, however, being in England, that 57.". 0 1 was an obstacle to the a )pointment. Another obstacle , was, that it was usual for the Sub. Sheriff, when ap pointed, to give securi:y to the amount of 1:20.00 0 . Now it was impossible to find any individual, capable of holding the office, w:)u was divote.l to give a se. curity to that amount f tr a limited pet iod. Mr. PLUNKETT olnervrd, that the examination of Mr. Sheriff Thorpe would not take very long, and then he might be disclaarged. Oa Konday, or 'rues dAy at latest, he might recut n to (re'and. HIGH SHERIFF OF DITOLIN• On the motion of Sir Faucets Minor rT, the Order of the Day for taking into comideratioa the conduct of the High Sheriff of Dublin was read. Sir FHA NCIS IWRDETT said it might be convenient, with a/Were:ice to the progress of public husines, , , to coni,le the inquiry which was about to commence to certain days in the week. He proposed that Mondays, Wednesdays, and Ft idly. should be devoted to the inquiry. Aftet some conversation, in which Mr. CALCHAFT, :ir. Pert, Sir FRANCI3 IhJILDETT, cud Mr. TICILMEIr participated, it seemed to be understood that Mondays, Thursdays, and Fridays should be the days appropriated to the inquiry. On the motion of Sir Fes :sets liminsrs, the Housevesolved itself into a Committee, fur; the purpose of continent:mg the in vestisatioat—Sir Hobert Heron in the Chair. Si; I.ItANCIS HU lIDETF observed, that having brought the proceeding to that point, he hoped that Honourable Gentle men who were necessarily better acquainted with the subject than be could pretend to be, would carry it on. CALCRAFT observed, that it would be proper to re quire any witnesses who might be in the gallery to withdraw ; and oa his motion, The SPEAKER directed the Serjeant at Arms to order all witnesses who might be in the gallery to withdraw. The order having been communicated to the gallery by the Of ficers of the House / six or eight Gentlemen accordingly withdrew. Mr. WYNN said, that Mr. Sheriff Thorpeought in justice to be present, that ,he might hear how the evidence affected him, since he was to be called upon to defend his conduct. 31r. F. LEWIS concurred in the propriety of allowing the Sheriff to be present, but only as a compliment, and by no means. as precluding the right of the House to examine him, the pro ceeding being in the character of an inquest. Mr. WYNN did not deny the right of the House to examine the Sheriff, hut the propriety of doing so. Mc. F. LE WIS denied that there would be any impropriety in examining the Sheriff. Mr. LA bIBTON observed, that it would be very absurd, after the resolution of the House to examine the Sheriff, to ab stain from doing so. • On the motion of Sir JOHN NEWPORT, the Clerk of the House read the Order fur the attendance of Benjamin Ricky, Esq. the Clerk of the Crown for the City of Dublin. The SPEAKER directed the Serjeant at Arms to inquire if M E . Ricky was in attendance. The answer being in the affirma title, that Gentleman was called in, and underwent an examina tion to the following effect : By the Coarastao—What is your name?—Benjamin Ricky. You are Clerk of the Crown in Dublin?—l execute that office. By Sir J. Nawroux.—For how many years have you exe cuted the office of Clerk of the Crown in Dublin?—For nearly thirty years. Have you brought with you any documents shelving the na ture of the panels and the Commission Grand Juries for the city of Dublin ?—I have. Have you brought with you documents chewing the nature of the panels and the Commission Grand Juries for the city of Dublin in the years 1 sl9, 1820, 1821, and 1822?-1 have, with the exception of the year 1820. Who are the other persons of whom the Term Grand Juries are composed, besides Aldermen ?—Of Sheriffs' Peers. What is the meaning of Sheriffs' Peers /—Sheriffs' Peers are persons who have served the office of Sheriff, or fined for it. The Term Panels are composed of Aldermen, Common Councilmen, and Sheriffs' Peers. How are the Common Councirelected?—By the various Guilds. The Guild of Merchants returns 31. Does any other Guild elect as large a number of Common Coun cilmen as the Guild of Merchants ?—None. Is the election of Common Councilmen annual ?—Triennial. Can you state the number of Corporators in the Panel and Commission Grand Juries, during the years 1819, 1820, 1821, and 1822, with the exception of the Docfmrent which you have not got believe I can. The witness hero stated the numbers. Those in 1821 and 1822, were as follows :- 1121.—January 9 sworn-13 not sworn. April 2 sworn— 2 not sworn. July 7 sworn-13 not sworn. August 8 sworn-13 not sworn. October 8 sworn— 9 not sworn. 1822.—January 2 sworn— 2 not aorn. February 2 sworn— 2 not sworn. April 2 sworn— 0 not sworn. June 1 sworn— 1 not sworn. August 1 sworn— 0 not sworn. October 5 bworn— 4 nut sworn. What was the number of Corporators in the Panel and Com mission Grand Jury in January 1823?-14 sworn ; 13 not sworn. Of how many did the last panel consist ?—Of fifty. Have you, in your experience of nearly thirty years, known any other instance of a pinel confined to so small a number as fifty?--Never. What is the smallest number of which you have known a panel to consist previously to that of January last ?—The witness here read the number of the panel at the various, periods of the years to which he had already referred. They were 61, 87, 71, 107, 79, 61, 77, 63, 72, 85,82, &c. . . . What place in the panel did the individuals who composed the Grand Jury in January last occupy ?—Down to the twenty-sixth name. With the exception of three, who were absent, all the in dividuals of the panel answered in rotation, until the Jury of twenty-three was completed. Have you ever known an instance in which the panel have so answered in rotation?—l do not recollect any such occurrence. have you ever before known an instance of a panel for a Commission Grand Jury, in which there have been so many Corporators as twenty-seven ; fourteen sworn and thirteen un sworn think not. _ _ Have you ever before known a panel for a Commission Grand Jury in which the Corporators composed a majority ?—I never observed such a circumstance. Mr. PLUNKETT here observed, that in August, 1021, the number of the panel being 79„ that of the Corporator' la it was 40, being more than half. Were the fourteen Common Councilmen, of whom the Grand Jury was composed, at the head of the panel, or where were they placed ?—(The answer was inaudible.) Were the three who were absent Common Councilmen?— Two out of the three were. Is It an ordinary occurrence, in calling over the panel for the Commission Grand Jury, to complete the Grand Jury without going through the panel ?—Very seldom. It is usual to go through the whole panel first, and then to.call them on fines. Look at the panels of preceding years. Can you state how far down they were proceeded with before the Grand Juries were completed?—(As witness was understood).—ln no case less than 75; in some 105. By Lard MILTON.—You have stated that the Grand Jury, in January last, was formed out of the first twenty-six individuals on the panel. How low on the panel did the Grand Jury im mediately preceding the last go?—To fifty-six. And the Grand Jury immediately preceding that ?—To 85. A short conversation here took place, in which Mr. Pson arrv, Mr. Hum, Mr. Prim, and Mr. BROUGHAM participated, u to the diSculty of ascertaining whether a Grand Jury was formed on the first calling over of the panel, or on the calling over on fines. By Mr. Bitouciums.—l wish to know whether the witness has any means of 'hewing ho* many Grand Jurors were called upon lines, and how many called in the ordinary manner ?—ln some instances I have, but in this I have not. The panels were fre quently called over upon him, without any intention of impos ing the fine. By the CHAIRSTAM—Have the goodness to state in how many Instances you have known the Grand Jury panel to have been exhausted?—The witness could not answer this question. Sir JOHN NEWPORT suggested, that the witness should make a return of the number of panels which were exhausted, and the number called upon Ones. Examination continued.—The panel is delivered to witness by the Sheriff. By Mr. S. Rtcli.—Never recollected a majority of the Grand Jury ottt of the Common Council, etcept Eft February, 1823. The Sh►riff is elected at Midsummer. The panel was almost iu sr:trial:ly delivered to him by the High Sheri. After any elec tion for Common Councilmen it was nor, to his kdowledge, cur tomary to put more on the panel out of compliment to them than at other times. He did not belong to the Corporation, anti had no means of aniwerine the question. By Mr. littowNi.ow.—Sheriff Thorpe made his first return to witness in October. in January 1823 he returned a panel of 50. He never heard that there were snore Con - mull Councilmen on the panel after an election than at any other time. By Colonel BA sv.—ln a case of such importatsce as the trial, of the Miners at the Theatre, and the Ilibisonnten, he knew no instance a a Grattil J try antt.veritig constcut,stely to their names, but on the indictment against the Miters at, the "l'ileatre. The cleilt had died who had the care of the panel that was missing. 'Witness was tint =wale of any particular circumstances attend ing the panel that was missing. Witness was not aware of any irte;,tialartty in the last panel, except in the number. Believed he might procure the panel of 1819 by sending for it. Witness was Clet It of the Crown tor AVestmeath, Queen's County, and King's County. '[he Grand Jury had not bi.en found in those coemies without recurring to more than 26 names.. It appeared to wit ness unusual to have more than half the Grand Jury composed of . Contnion Councilmen. Ile did rot know if it was irregular nor ot. NVittless did not know exactly when the Commoti Coun cil had been elected. Mr. More was a Common Councilman. — Ile drew no inference, whether as agent to an English Company he was connected with Dublin. lie believed there were no Catholics or the panel of Ite23. He had not sufficient know ledge of the opinions of Gentlemen.upon previous Grand Juries, to know whether any of them were Catholics or not. Did not know two persons of the name of Atkinson had been summoned to the Bar of the House. On the evening of the first day the Grand Jury sat, he sent the panels to the house of the Attorney- General by order of the Court. Could not recollect if that had ever been done before. His recollection was, that a person named Alacullock had been neither in custody nor on bail. Examined by Mr. liaouctuax—Witness bad been its his office 1.1811 ; knew of two Bills which had been proffered by Sir Edward Littlehales, and which had been ignored by the Grand Jury, and after which an er officio information had been filed by Mr. Saurin, the Attorney-General, to which no plea had been entered. What are the dunks of the Term Grand Juries?--They make presentments of money. I don't understand this; it is all Irish—(A laugh) ;—state what you mean?—They direct money to be assessed in the city of Dublin. In what way are the inhabitants assessed? Are they assessed according to their property ?—I believe with reference to Mi. rasters' money—(A laugh). We are getting deep& and deeper into ignorance. For what purposes is the money which the Term Grand Juries present?— For a variety of purposes. Upon the motion of Mr. DA WSON, the witness was ordered to withdraw. He conceived the course pursued by the Learned Member to be irregular. Mr. BROUGHAM said that he had some misgivings in his mind that the state of Ireland—the administration of justice there was so very ticklish a thing, that he could scarcely be al lowed to ask a single question about it without being interrupted by some one or other.* He was not therefore disappointed at the interruption of the Hon. Gentleman—he was prepared for it. Any person who might wish to see an inch before his nave, who might wish to take a single step in an attempt at elucidation, might calculate on interruption; hut surely it was not a farthing candle, but the full torch light of truth and inquiry that the Com mittee required, in an examination that promised to be long and important. They had embarked in sn investigation quite new; it was one, he hoped, for the benefit of Ireland. For the first time they proceeded in an inquiry into the gross, corrupt, and flagrant manner in which justice was administered in that country; it was absolutely and indispensably necessary, that every circum• stance that could throw light on that investigation should be brought forward. It was impossible that the House could pro ceed one step, unless they knew what they were teally about ; and when he for the first time had heard of the Session Grand Jury f Commission Grand Jury. Term Grand Jury, and a va riety of other names, wholly new to English Members, what was more natural than to ask for distinct explanations, in order to enable them to put further questions? With that view he had put a question to the witness—how far corruption might have lurked in the answer, he could net say, because the an swer was not given. Sir G. Ina had no objection to go into the most minute inquiry; and begged no stop would be put to it by his Hon. Friend—(Hear, hear). Mr. BROUGHAM felt happy at the support he received from the Right Hon. Baronet. He did mean to shy that the House was to enter into the whole of the state of Ireland. Witness recalled, and the examination resumed by .31r, FIROUGHAIL—The Term Grand Jury, and the Session Grand Jury levied money for the payment of the salaries of Officers — of the Clerk a the Crown—(A Laugh)—Town Clerk of Dub lin, and other Officers of the Corporation. The Town Clerk was appointed by the Corporation of Dublin. The Grand Jury gave the contract for the clothing of the convicts, by open bid ding. lie had said before he was not the Officer of the Corpo ration. The Sheriffs elect had been both on the Graud Jury that had ignored the Bill. By Mr. G. Dawson.—lf any improper practices took place in the levying of money, were not the citizens of Dublin more to blame than the Grand Jury? • Mr. GOULBURN rose to order.—lf the House wished to procure information relative to the Corporation and the Grand Jury, they ought to have the proper Officer before them. Mr. S. RICE thought the inquiry should be gone into for the information of English Members. Mr.WYNN objected to an examination by inference. Colonel BARRY was a friend to the fullest inquiry generally, but thought the present subject should be first finished. Examination resumed.—All persons had a right to traverse a presentment. He recollected all the particulars of the er-offacia information of 1811, in consequence of his attention being called by the then Clerk of the Crown, under whom he held a situa tion. The date of the information was 1811. By Sir J. MacEnrrose.—The present Clerk of the Crown was Mr. Kemmis; and in 1311 he acted in conjunction with his father. By Mr. Binnter--Witness bad been a short time in town, and had been eked some questions by the Attorney-General. In answer to a question from Mr. H. Gummy—The witness answered that the first twenty-six personi summoned on the last panel had answered to their names, and were sworn. Sir F. BURDETT thought that no more witnesses should be called that night. Colonel BARRY thought that the examination should proceed. Mr. BROUGHAM said, if any witnesses wished to be exa mined, he thought there should be no objection on the part of the House. . Mr. PLUNKETT said, that none of his witnesses were then in attendance. Mr. S. RICE said, the House should examine the evidence already given, before they called for more witnesses. There was no chance of the examination of Sheriff Thorpe, if called, being concluded that night. • The CHAIRMAN then reported the Minutes of Evidence, and obtained leave to sit again on Monday. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER suggested that the examination of the witnesses should else at nine o'clock. Mr. BROUGIIAM proposrd ten o'clock on Monday, and nine on other nights.—This was agreed to. Mr. GOUT:BORN seas extremely desirous to bring on the Insurrectiou Act, but was at the mercy of the Honourable Gen tlemen opposite, who had preoccupied all the days for nistions for some time. Mr. HU3IE said lie had a notice for the 6th, which he would withdraw—(Hear)—upon one condition. He would not occupy tbc House by saying a single word if the Honourable Secretary would grant his motion—(Laughter).--h was only (or a Com- Mittee of Inquiry into the State of Newfoundland. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, that the Honourable. Member could not render the service even upon his own terms, for his motion had not the precedence on din day. h was the Honourable Member for Lanarkshire : whii had it in his power. • The Freeholder s Qualification Bill. vim read a second and ordered to be committed for the 15th. On bringing up the Report of the Irish .Conatables' Bill, Mr. S. Ititm proposed a clause, which was opposed by Sir G. flux, Colonel 11.41,av, and others, and. supported by Sir Jam: Newroar. The house divided on the clause. The numbers were for the clause, 14—Against it, 27 Majority 15. The Report was then received, and the Dill was ordered to be read a third tin*. Mr. .1. WILLIAMS obtained leave to bring In a Bill fur rendering the affirmation of Quakers admissible iu criminal cases. The other Orders of the Day were then disposed of i end the House adjourned at Ilalf-past Twtlve o'CiQck. FRENCH PAPERS. \ INTELLIGENCE FROM THE . ARMY IN SP.w:. ISOM lax JOURNAL DZS unArt. Nets, Ana jigAD-QVARTERS, VITTORIA, APRIL 26.—W e have occui.: Burgos since the WM. The Duke de Reggio advaacid his Ilea— quarters on the 1.5 d, and pushed his advanced guard on the toA t of Aranda and Valencia. Our troops are received throut!heet the country with the most lively transports of joy. " General ,;%lolitor set out Irons Tudela ea the 27d, to conti .7 k hi; movement upon Saragossa. The head of the divisions of e. valry arrived to-day at Vittoria." It is certain that we are at Salas'OSsA, althou,h thefe is no official account of it. It is added, S E the t fight bank of the Ebro is cleared to Tar ragon a a n d to the sea. It appears, that the Cortes have in reality fewer soldiers than was imagined. Thus thii heroic Saragossa, which cost Bgnapa /t , so much by the defence made by its pripulatini, opened its gates to the French under the smutted of legitimacy ! n(014 THE CONSTIIUTIONNEL. L.Tioile states, that according to all appearance,, General Jlorillo had fallen into a Royalist anibucta4, and that he has beeii art ested by those who parr., is said, shamefully abandoned him. The General-in-Chief Mina appears to blished on the right bank of the Ter, and it is pre sumed, according to C tdoile, that he will not delay to march upon the Ebro. General Milans has taken a position at Olot. PEI PIGNAN, APRIL 22. The oscillations in the movements of the troos s have at length terminated, and all the different corps which are to compose the army of Lanspourdan ate immediately to proceed to then respective statioas. The Pi jests and Monks who were to set out iu all haste to return to their homes, almost all remain n i , the frontier. Those of Olot sent an express yester day to their brethren who temaia at Pet t) tell them not to stir; that Llobera occupies °int w i t i a considerable corps of troops; and that Mina has as sembled a strong army at Vich. The Fluvia bathes the walls of Olot, and %rich is one day's march from that town. To-day the Marshal' has caused Rosas to bet ilten possession of by our troops. That place and the port are to be put in a state of defence, to protect our commerce and our debarkations, as vessels s ill hence forth be expedited from port N'endees. TH E EVENING STAR,. LONDON. SATURDAY, MAY 3, 152.3. TIIF. FUNDS. STOCK EXCIIANGE, TWELVE O'CLOCK. Consols opened . this morning at 78i, j, and rose to j, j, with a brisk Market, and much business doing. FOREIGN FUNDS. There was considerable bustle in the Market this mornint, and a good deal of business done. Nest Spanish Bonds optud at 33g, and rose to 36; went down again to 55i. The caused this sudden rise io-lior etactly known : some persons attritive it to the great scarcity of the Spanish Stock, and others to a pending Negociation between France and Spain. Current Prices:—Milian New Spanish 351, New Pros. sian 84, Old 831, - Russian 77k to 78, Danish 87, Nespolitaa 721, Colombian 651. • • PRICE OF STOCKS AT ONE O'CLOCK. Bank Stock 216 1 / 4 V 4-3 per Ct. Reduced 78 I 4 S per Cent. Cons. 78% 5 % 4 per Cents; 014,96% % % 4 per Cents. Nevi, - 0 1 / 8 987 8 Bank Long Annuities 20 1.16 1 / 8 India Bonda 965. 89s. • Exchequer Bills of £l,OOO, 15s. 16s. Ditto' Small 15s. ISS. Consols tor Payment 78% '34 5 5/s• TELEGRAPHIC DISPATCH FROM PARIS. 'STAR OFFICE, TWO O'CLOCK. We have just received a copy of a Telegraphic Dispatch from the Minister of the Interior, at Paris, to the Mayor of Calais, which confirms the report of Saragossa having fallen. The following is a trans lation of the Dispatch: " PARIS, DIAT t " THE MINISTER 07 THE INTERIOR TO THE NSTOR OF CALAIS : Mowsnut 11SAToR, " The advanced-guard of the Second Corps en tered Saragossa on the 25th ult. The citadel of Jaca is in the power of the army of the King— The revolutionary Chief has been arrested, =dill' troops have tendered their submis►ion. " A. T. M. Benard, Mayor, Calais." Dutch Papers to the Ist inst. and Hamburgh Pa• pers to the 26th of Ap►il, reached us this forenoon , but they contain no intelligence of importance. A 3 article {tom Vienna, of the 14th ult. states, that the King of NAPLES will wait in the Austrian capital for the result of the war with Spain, which it venture to assert " will doubtless be soon over." The corps of 160 men, taken to the ltforatid KEPIIALLOS, of . Olympus, is broken up, and ih greater .part of them returned to Europe. AXSTIRDASI, April 29.—Exthange on London, 40. 0.-7 14 months, 40. 6.—Ditto on Paris, two months, 56. 15.16. Iliqrsuitnu, April 25.—Exchange on London 37. 57`" Ditto on Paris, two months, 26. 130.141, April N.—Exchange on London, 7.4 i. Perxxstuttott, April 11.—Exchange on London, 9 . 7-16 "‘ :Itusterdarn, 9. 13.33.—Ilomburgb, 100. • However much the state of Ireland may be et aggerated by local misrepresentation, or by tk colouring of the Lab Journalists, there can VW doubt that a most daring system of outrage, rest lady organised, and extensive in its ramification! ,° , cart icd on in Ireland. in another part of our Bird pre be ritie :lig lion of a prei Veal tol au par Am thel this me Bei 'eve 151, 7- 301 • aid ; pee her btu Nay but Col •oh bin cm Eli' .sis r