Star. — London, England, 1814-04-23 00:00:00

_* • :; , even' ot 'allure, that hisltilare mos(he tnenkontd to the Throne by a self constituted an tborit y -(l*tt%) I wish to ask whether the numerous body of rtetitio. pets, at whose instance he had brought Inv/ord that di s cussion, expected that if they failed, their ~.61harii, m ust be *aeon ,_ in tite Name manner, accompanied by t iiiiiltrisittrorgaltrzniTtit an Ittiatitiorl it - tail. beatipo. ~1 tort the trccuse4an 'isonveyed.in the .gluase I,! . twarlitatental laws,''apilast the :visor - firs ort'hat question, that they bad any deslgn of al• 4Mtig them; and I think the Callicilits hale :o e right to thinnlain, that. having been Volt desetil d WI - papists. nid Rornartisti, they are here ,desig - '• till .ii . 'itiltriii4iledging . ll foreign jtiriidiction." Aire. • the tit bits vald the nature of that jitrisdiction stated? Vol aid 1 - Cannot help thinking, that_in times like •tliepresedt, it would have been more wise to have it!isf l ined from any topics of useless 'irritation---to bate remeOhered the language of Paley, to have atH tedin the genuine spirit of toleration; rather than to 1 Mite hoasteif how mach hid' been done for it. How. if it WiltrOw that some future Spencer, availing him', self if thii example, may not conceive himself at • liberty to itikkit a rejected measure the vehicle of sarcastic observation. - and by affixing a new denotni tiation.ioeilerciie new modes of hostility ? May he not select iiinte opportunity where petitions have, af ter enduring a long and tedirats suspense, begun to derive consolation frOm the dawn of a brighter day, to add mortification to disappointment, and aim a fatal blow :it a measure too difficult to be carried, even with all. the weight of Ministerial authority)— It is against the danger.that I wish to guard, a dan ger threatenlOg alike-the right of petitioning . and the dente Of abate. It is to preserve these rights, in •Whielt the ftekclotti of the Constitution depends, that I ant aineiiiis. Obliterated as that freedom was du • • littfi the rote of the Norman line, it has never failed ... to reigipearVining the intervals and relaxation'of ty rarny. • 'tit thireign of Henry IV. due ing the con te-zs Ow a *sniffed succession, in answer to an id dress -ifeilin the - Spraket, .that his Mesty could not hied - tis 'ariflsfivate Information o f whit passed amoit_g'ltiitaktiftil Commons, but could judge them only by their deeds; that King replied that he could not give deaiitie to such informers, because the pro craediogs of tPtat House were known by the acts of its collective bnap.-411ea0. Rear, hear!) This freedom, 0 which Was altirivards cotifinned by the 9:h of that Monarch; prhvis that it was not of such modern dare 4 some persons' may suspect, and that although it may often have been suspended, it has never oe comeerttinct. It i's asserted in that noble protesta tion addressed 'to James I. a Prince with •eeins to have beet as ignorant of 'the Age in which he lived as of the pe.pis he had tome to govern, and who is mid to have expimged it .with his own hand from our lemenals; The same princi p le was maintained by the Lo. Parliament—a Parliament, which, though 7 . -Itirumbled the pride of Kings, undoubtedly disgra - ted the cause of titedom, by ch'sing its exertions to • watrage and blood. The Revolution carne subse *toddy to give to it its final confirmation, and esor., lbsti. d is, to diffuse vrgour and animation through • Wear tuture deliber.Voils. It is not for the purpose lif-attacking an individual that this question is now brought forward—it is from .an earnest tiesire to ',Mich over the sacred Lime of constitutional jealousy, . -at it was termed by Mr. Borke.—a jealouseof that Constitution whit . witictivie haie long been blessed, and which ii now coifed as a model for the infant liberties of other nations. It is to raise and main tain the spirit of e ;r lianient, and to defend those pri vileges, without which all other principles must be andangered, that Tinove this Kest:Alnico: " that a Veda iiiktflie 11! de the Journals to the follow * atiet r last - it. iniotru Ais Ma. e)stoilaere, of any Maims Ike same ^ ftescL.ition of a ulczt dig * iodowing Made by tile %ytag tt gripe spteclialuok s k at the end ' tot be Lori:ilia , yself to Its at insensible to t h e agopted, so in -; but I shall and also on the touched upon in failed upon to to tits House, nients—as cat ..t and cOststitat. ...4 kre, .41s, . .d . sd expect (100 1 ..oe jiistice and plain dealing .. MA* Lord, that, he Wilulti Mire brought forward a discilict Charft against the to taiscaudact. But as the nisei , * 0. tb,' Nable LOr4 t iO,Oml,se!y. a prospective regtiti egai nik gi F on as t think „, ' I,n want to the case ; ' is the red ' seems to be (Quailed iwt ere. stlinPfton 661nm:duct on ay par', I hope' 1 guy be la ~ . frith the leave of the 'Moine, to state why suc h r lt ft.iitiois is wholly voundleis. far, Orrigi ,' .%! Pt,tr 4l agm' t 4 11°,11P6C . sr. I t IrtiOr'. .". - , .:,4 l prifcestiirity• rwiTL proceedings or - passe with tesonSflai, ithislie'elOnii ' otighk to have heel aclvenkt# .co 10 t bi.ge,fi c h 'A l i& '. I fonh occasion to dellirc AF'l6ll', tat orthe House , of Lords ? Secondly, irthtinflui eePdings might tiihare been noticue.„ Whether *if were noticed in a proper manner ? As to thi first di these questions, I humbly admit to the Ilt.use,duit according t3'the practice Of Parliament, all or any of, niattets that haVe occupied Ike •:----' - nf the panel objects 4 ;e t tlß 111%, employ.— tiltsf the • mai, •tt ... .r, tting.'ais. s. . ' trie,lcitim de• e Lords that tisti pt o i for 4 sOltistane% df el nude out Stab 0.. L ea • s HTlie•fltsc instopte . speech •of this kind ti ell , ! ef 445 rd, is thee Cifieie iti Je 09; iirtheeeign of ' , L Henr i t VIII,Ahe nest is taipt Mr.'Speaker Lent iiilf, ftrlB l ll".• — there were - ffsany (letting the reign of Charles 11. In 1689 AO were tvio ; but none • • dutitm the reign :King William. From Ni till the present time, there is no prorogation sifitelh'hy any Wafer entered at full length on the Journals ,o 1 either .11otiaits ' je t , 1-741 Mr. Speaker Onslow niede several sptetlies In the bar of the other House, on presenting Bills of Supply 1 and there.are net less than fourteen speechei on such occasions by. ibis Speaker, which embrace different topics that had engaged the attention of the Commons. Athong the instances which I have mentioned, in the entries of the House of Lords, there are abundant proofs of the extension of the usage at all times. Some of the earliest instances contain reference tef the proceedings of the House of Commons, not only relating to mo ney bills, but to various other measul t es. In the reign of Charles I. Mr. Speaker Lenthall's speech includes, many topics besides the money bills which were ere. sented at the time that ii was spoken. Mr. C,srtio ton's speech in 1715, touched upon various subje.u.. And in 1741, Mr. Speaker Onslow, in his speech, label notice of affairs that had happened even out of the' kingdom. Mr. Speaker Compton's speech con tains observations on the treaty of Utrecht ; and Mr. Onslow touches on the conduct of some naval offi cers in the Mediterranean. On a particular examt nation of the speeches made on such occasions during the last century, it will be found that they relate not only to Money Bills,laut touch on various public oc currences, both at home and abroad, even although these matters are not brought to the consideration of the Crown by Bills or otherwhe. In 1746 the speech of the Speaker at the bar of the House of Lords al ludes to the voluntary subscription set on foot by the people during the time of rebellion ; and again en tered into the mischief to Be apisrehended front further alliances. Further—it was usual in such speeches to touch upon questions agitated within the walls of this House, and concerning its privileges.- -After the Rebellion in 1745, the Speaker, in his speech, notices a Bill which had been distUssed in this House, relating to the internal regulation of the Highlands of Scotland,, and not only mentions the prOceediugs concerning that Bill, but enters into a detail of the different opinions held upon the subject. 4nd this without fear of rePreherision. If, as the, Noble Lord asks, it be necessary to bring . a prece dent of any thins being said'on such occasions as to Bills which had not been passed by the House, I would observe that there are only eleven of the speeches made on such cecasions, that are pteserved at length ; but that there are precedents for such tl' practice, and there can be no doubt on the subject. Such a doubt is without any just ground for its esist ence. From the antlsinity of Mr. Speaker Onslow, it appears that on such occasions it was perfectly al lowable to extend to the notice 'not only of such Bills as had been passed by the House, but to such as, al though not passed, had enga ged the attention of the House. In 1758 a Bill, relattag to the Habeas Cor. pus Act, was passed by the House of Commons, but seas rejected by the 'House of Lords. On this subjectl the "speaker Onslow touched, in a speech which hii had t.repared to make at the bar of the House O E I Lc:l.th, but which be did nut deliver on account of.t the absence of the King. This I adduce as the au thority of Mr. Speaker Onslow—(fear, Hear, Ilea',, frost the Oleliositiou Brack.)-11 hope I may be aiiowed to refer to a speech on the records of the P. 1111 4- meat of IreLoid, which bears upon this point. In 1792, in the Parliatnent of Ireland, a bell was brought in for the further relief of the Roman Catholics, per mitting than to occupy certain situations in the law, and allowing them to intermarry with Protestants. Aft'r tt•.,, F..st and second reading, of this Bill, and.; wflile i! ws in a Committee, a petition was pieseutek in coosequeilco of which the Bill was rejected. At the close 'of 'the session Mr. Speaker Foster (whom , although now present. I hope I may be permitted to name historically), thought it his duty to advert, is his speech, to a matter which he conceived to be of ouch importance, and to state what he conceived to have been the motives by which the House had been halm:need in its INW&ieditige respecting that Bill; ' i and for that very speech he received the thanks of the rash Mouse of Commons on the same da y . On ; reviewing the whole question, I conceive that in such cases the Speaker is allowed to refer to measures which have been d'isea'sed, unlimited by any coma.. deratioe as to their progress er failure. All weaved 44 to the importance of the matter on which I' esiettlied; I would we. nit 'itch an occasion, have, t legin*k l ed, even if there bad • nut bleu any'' mi ll for the relief of the Roman Catholics be-' Airelisillottse dining that session • but in the same; *Sodom *Sill had . beet rimed for th e l relief of the Ca .tiheikie filyhkit hod orivnisted in the House of Lords. "4 police a Ws' hi% which &Conceived to be my, duty,-teiteismilY brought the whole question under , alnittdat'siddiss abd involved the proceediogs of the Legifittute Ivo! it. As to the second question, whether. aikeittnis that the proceedings the House an die stibiEctof the claims of the Rodman Catholics ought to have heed tiotieed by me. they were noticed igi II 'l l i 6 Per allitheti Iciirould submit to the House ; that its proce#4o . • svifierbeated with truth and cos tecides-„, . The it - . baying : bunt before the liaise, * me Little Bill nue *vine ' jiaidea by it. bat the iltdothith had beeii ' Cid' into the other House rotueett litg . thitce Of /4 oik' . . , having been passed; the • 64”1 1 1freat I stated the proceedings of this Elaine M' Heise :•-- 4 These are not th e only ob. jetfiteti f.h• our atteraion has been called ; other stinsiiitiffid4 &Vries hive been proposed for our con- Adlierip, boWever, to • Ttwo . fie, Parliament, Made • . - 411 we t. rag. Tile tn .* granting to thgesaltolita:pielitte al poiverepie thi was g taint rev fttit " Ikt:tat negatived in the Comillintini in the parikstepli sthich t!tave read, it is not bald hat 04,801' e'ak Ilefect4d. It merely states Why ID! Irlousc *lad' what would not do It sale nothing respectint what - House at some future timer and tinder different etn curastances. might think proper to do. So far as it goes, it states tke reasons, by mentioning that the laws require the Throne, the Legistaittre; sad a)* Government, to be Protestant : and that the Catlin lies admit a foreign jurisdiction. I conceive it tO the'dity of the Speaker tts *ststte, as nearly as Resets possibly ascertain, the n'ai'ves by which thi was Actbitikt such' a bi'ne. The question whether I have stated the motives of the Maitatiq. of , the House truly ? This was theltasic which I hitt to execute, and by the. execution. of which I tittle rn be tried. There is One point which as it. has been advert ed to, I think it necessary that I slriuld now say a few words, though othtsisrlie I should certainly have deented it ante stip.erfinlititi—f mean the assertion that the Speakercan heti' dif knowledge of what has. been done by the House, when it is in a Cdrisanittee. It is my duty to be prevent, and to take, Cognizance of tee proceedings of the House while' in a , es.ointatt tee. ; altnough indeed by the indulgence orate noise t.,e auseece of the Speaker is, perfume& Butit is tlie a,u necessary that he should be prevent; beciuter when his takes the chair, be maybe celled on to ie. ci.' some matters .'r he may lie called to the chair, as. a•' appeled to myself, and celled - upon 011 his !eV: .1 .y to state his opinien on a question of ; rbe referred to for what passed. Bet even when a Bill never comes out of a Committee, the proceedings are recorded on the Committee Books, and to them the Speaker must have access. On such a technical objection, I should have thought that Ise one in the least versed in Parliamentary matters woot . have attempted to found the pretence of an a- g u.. ment. As to what I said on the extension of toiente Lion ; the subject being necessarily brought before din Sovereign by the nature of the proceedings; it l e* proper to state the opinion of the Legislature on thle subject, the more so as the prerogative of the Croat is much concerned in whatever relates to the jorisdie r tion in that matter. On the whole 1 would observe I that the Speaker is entitled to address the Sovereign on any matters that have been discussed by this House during its session, without any regard to the I length of time they may have occupied the attention Of the Hciuse ; and that .where he does notice the prts- ceedings of the House, he is to state the motives by which the majority seems to have been actuated is deciding the question. Great authorities have made the path of my duty plain 1 0 4 Hope that on their au thority I isaVe established my vindication. As to the' question now before you, it is not for me to sway''(, your judgment upon it. The freedom of debate cannot be shackled by ail historical statement of the proceedings of the House. If the House willi take on itself to ,prescribe new rules for the conduct' of its Speaker, and to circumscribe his duties withiel narrotver limits than they have heretofore been cots.l fined, it will be for you well to weigh the nature and consequences of these new regulations. If it sliouid. please the House to enact them, it will then only re- 1 main for the Speaker to conform to them with exact ness. I must conclude with my thanks for the atten tion with which I have been hear'). I saw the pro ' ceeding of the i-louse in the matter of the Roman Cii. tholic Claims, forms one of the most prominent fea tures •in the transactions of the last Sessions,. and I • thought it my duty to notice them in my speech.— If .by my conduct in this instance I shall have in curred, even the indirect censure of the House, I shall lament it as a very heavy misfortune. But must so* that to my own conscience I shall stand for ever acquitted in what I have done, not only rip. the servant of this House, but from having fulfilled' my duty as a Representotive. of the people."— (Lae' and ractinaed dicers). . Mr. WHITBREAD having been so particularly' alluded to, found himself called upon to speak. Is the early part of the Session he had taken occasion to say. that he conceived that the SpeAker had been an 'unauthentic expositor of the sentiments-of the House. As he had said before, he would now say it again: that (tight Hon. Personage had no aidlionty to 'eke the liberty which he had taken when he delivered the speech at the bar of the House of Lords, at the end of the last Session, being, as he had described him self, the servant of the House of Commons. As such, ise bad transgressed his duty. After the many yeare that he (Mr. Whitbread) had witnessed, and wit nessed with uniraried approbation, his conduct in the Chair, he conceived that the c resent was not a time to pay him compliments which might be deserved.— In arraigning his conduct, he wished it had been the conduct of another. He had cent plained that no di ned charge had been made against him ; but it oc. curred to him (Mr. W.), that be would not discharge Ins duty as a Member of the House of CommOnst unless he arraigned him for his conduct. They had been referred by him, as was anticipated by the No-. ble Mover, to some strange precedents. The tree sures of Mr. Qnslow and Mr. Hassell had been brought before them, though he considered these au thorities as of less consequence than the Right Hon. Gentleman seemed to think them. But be (the Speaker) had somehow omitted the particular °pi-, 'niun of Mr. Onslow. He would like to seethe speech which had been prepared by that• Gentleman, but Which had never seen the light, and which appears', not to have been applicable to the case. A mistake seemed to,have been committed by the 'Right Hon. Gentleman in citing Mr. ()Won's speech. It was known that Mr. Onslow had intended to make a cer-I tale speech,' which,- however, he did not make, al thougn he had prepared it. Now, although this speech was cited as a constitutional authority, it was not unlikely that Mr. Onslow might have. been pre delivering he, it 'the eat 4one, attfd asignted the Venues *Sly it %id ma i • agreed to certain meagutes. Mr. Falai ' mite stood, did not, in any one p,if,igraph.oChis speadiy„ advert to any raeasnre discussed the Is 4h Homo of Commons, without adding. Oat the Bills to them paced ; except telling hi m e mat - wse snlieltrusess-u.-.--- ----- - _ - Mr. Foster had stated to the Cserwusi lila the prosperity, and mannfaetareridf lielaid; dia a :on a this= liiiiismerit - fie ilhristif tillF .Lieutenant (sillislitAlli addressed; of course, vs lin setoien). that biktalb measures' ha been prat 'ilea and defeated kitating, at the fame time, the Travel .why, they had been defeated. He would wish amp Member to read. the speech of Mr. Foster, .ind. 4 point out, as tie Right Win. Gondemsalmd doneii(si his conscience sake, auF•thing analogous moths Aimee* at the close of the last.Session.-,-Efiere the Him; Member moved, that Mn Foster's Sposecirlista 4l- ikii read, which was accordintly done.}C . ololl///4 4 Membe r ,point out a passage of.W,.lrtsstnes ilegt which could serve as a precedent to the Rittht. rGentlensau ? Mr. Foster snit(, Mat the • resseatimit ascendancy ought to be preserved ; bOt he hail an said that it Was endangered by the qsiottre serldliNclis be alluded.. 'there, was not one foOt of *Taira iffla which the Right Hein. Gentt-rresn cooldlitsmshimpane &dent in the speech of Mr. Foster. The Might 'Haw Gentleman had treated very lightly the objbetiondiat he could not know what *at done by the litinse•dllina it was in a' Committee, and had ssid, that thie Speailier had a tight to be present whets the House was stir a Committee. He Would refer the Right limn. Geode. man to his ogil e atitbority, Mr. Speaker enisldsv, OA he will fwd it laid down by him, tleituelf..tntie Haws was in a Committee the Speaker *as the only liken ber exempted from attending ; and the only owl eibo could nor be compelled to attend. 'He wiatdd Mir the Honourable Gentleman to his own teit-toosik where he would and, that 44 wh en the House iris,* Committee, the Speaker was supposed' to be' in lei private room."--( Rehr-, Bear, * hear, from sieerri7 Brach. J-He meant to speak. techniCally. The Ili . . Hon. Gentleman theft delivered his opinions It was strange that he had not taken !sari in the debates at a former time, when party feelings were - ear:4er," a • height never before kno\vrt in this country-to ` 'height, which those who had witnessed the debt= that House conk/ never forget. If the Itigbt 'Gentleman had 'then stated his eentinierits-st biliadl then endeavouretl to assuage the acrimony .f ?Wk. and to restore order-it might have been of' rests. At be atver *mitered his sentiments oh :that tae Meal which was non called the Dube of Ntorfofit's lid, tell which, in 1007, When the Right How. Gentleman . filled the Chair, bore the name of a Noble relaeosicif .his (Viscount Howick, now ?Art Grey). mit Whidls occasioned the distolution of the-Wattidisti-a6oi l it that day: He) contended, cLit.' is Speakee, site Right I-lon. Gentleman could not, except by "mild instruction from the Chairman of. a Committee, be put in possession of the circainstances whieb,occurrid in that Committee . And st,c4 • were . Ow estriost. nary proceedings of that particular Committee; whieis sat upon the Catholic Bill, that even from she Chair-'k Man he could not Ile received any iiiformatiOn (Near, bear.).-The House of, Comoros, after Jae( deliberation and mature telleiticn, .sent The Catholic Bill to a Committee. By" a mainriey of lover the clause, which gave the Roinan Calhoties a right se sit in P.O liament, was lost. The Right Hon, Genth ruin being one of those whn voted against ir. When :e resumed the Chair, no Report 'mai made to bin from that Committee: there was 'not, itierefore, any prrceeding _before Vie Right ion. Gentleman, el which he had a r'ght to ar-.r, sorl,eit he declaved, that the Bill was defeated. The Bill, at the time tin Right Hon. Gkritleman made the statement, Wai ill existence and alive. -111 ear, hear.)-XV as this, then. an authentic exposition of the s..fitiments of the House ? . Did de Right Honourable Gentlemen not know-could be pietend not so lianw; - Mit the Bill had not expired ?-(Laud air: of Rear, Lear! steal Order, order! from She Ministerial 'Jencks:4-14k. Whitbread observed, that he was .called apts a is speak out, and he would speak out.-,(4 I.nt:A.)- -. . Could the Right Honourable Gentlematt explain the motives on which every individual-acted on this er-` i casion ? if, It 1807, the Right Hen. Geminate had stated that the provisions of Lord Howick's Sal were rejected,.because they would endanger the Coo. stitution-those provisit us which were since Itappiir introduced in the Duke of Norfolk's Bill-these pro visions, now passed in England, and so long pro mised to the Catholics of Ireland-would that haw been a faireaposition of the sentiments of teat iHoaw? And, when Mr. Speaker Foster made his exposition on the necessity aide Protestant ascendancy in Isis land, hal he id his contemplation that, is die very nest Session of the Irish Parliameet, some ef these concessions-were granted to the Catholics, and west • passed into a law, whiCh had been previously refuset.! (Rear, hear.) This pioved the impropriety of ad verting to measures, which sere rely laid asidefor a moment-which might be introduced. successfully introduced, in a very short time after their defeat was announced. As a private Member, the Right Hat. Gentleman certainly had a right to speakin a CoM mittte; but as Speaker be had ne right akerwartle, to mention what had passed. He had no tightwitisr leer to Make the eipOsition lie bad done, sat is,bldia. lie ooniiiilered a Violation of duty from bagiiisiain• 'Aid-Vicar; hear,) -aggravated by the eitaasims is which. he was placed- , Rear, hear.) The Right Ho [iourable Gentleman bud quoted Mr. Hatsell. He IWir.lslirbithread) would refer him to that part .of it, ' where the answer of Mr. Speaker Li-ntail was to IA found, who, when King Charles demanded the 6ve obnoxious Members, answered. 4 , I have neither eyLs to see, ears to hear, nor tongiie 'napes*, but as Olt House directs." The Right Hon. Gentleman's cili duct had been very different-it differed essentially from that Ilich should be 'the conduct of evcl.!, stet, bed tfy the more trent mtios--(Hear, !liar.) Here • every praise, that nei voui I, subject fame earful to at screed—be trig t even (Merl, the new financial arrangetn Hon., GentlemAh seemed to effects even beyoad the colt cellor of the Exch equer, or jesty's lilinit:ers.;—(e laugh.) that part of the speech, whirl', sent discussion, he found w ceive to be soy thieg but and which, therefore, deser , As the Right Hon. Gentler `dissatisfaction, *becanse a d 'noted on the present. occasi ' , would now submit. one, as a believed, was couched in u He then moved, , That all the words,. after the the purpose of introdueting— It a t Speaker did, at the close of the House of Lords, communlLite to Regent, ceraltt proceedings of ti of the whole Howie, relatise to miblects, which rlicttiot tetminat said did inform his Royal kiigh: *Wets Ite presumed actuated the they took ; whereby he was guilt posed in him, and n breads of el which be is die chosen grardiat a This Amendment was st Mr. BANKES. was rem solutions which has( been menu ; but he should firs lug the last of them, becau and substantial'of the two. charged With a gross viol speech which he delivered House at the end of the lat tion, it was proper that the sst.occasion should be an matters which have eng House during its sitting. wed the authority of Mt. 1 being desirous to know borne out by the documen opinion, he had consu selves, and found that tl bis Matters eve tioo, of the House had, h speeches made on such. o Bess. ruuliug that this wild that the case under c taken out of the general . speeches, merely on accot Zia having been droppe *at the Right Hon. Gee part of the subject very li objection of his not bei thing of the proceedings tee. Nothing could be r that the Speaker, on tal tome at once ignorant of et, or had participated in aids s, the proceedings of tied, and to these new& Right Hon. Cent] appealing to the precedi Onslow.- As to the sp spoken by the latter, i seemed to ridicule any that such a speech caul( cominissiohers in the at robing the proceedings All had sot been finisia Speaker was not authi that subject in his speec dents not only justitied would sanction even Nouse negatived both I come to some affurnatil Mr. WILLIAMS die Speaker had any kr ithssed when he Made 11 tuber Kos. ? From t the practice for the Spi stew words on the sub tented for the Royal al in what he cooceived t of recapitulating the i the House to have bet But is no instance wai he Speaker os such ai posed by a single Men Bided or pending. H who wont A greater lei fesatied fully by pr' sae branch of the Lti trance ot a penes...din die tuned it laid dot asiciemt, undoubted ci was under - discussioi mess, the troivn mho Gt. In 175% a I stated his wish to b the purpose. of rnentii ing to a Coutt-ritartia to the House on the i once took the alarm, oafs that it should nc the speech of Mr. not one word was sa stood that any bill tu before the House. thorhy ot Mr. liatse would wish to haw were instances m w such as in that of a been before the Hou were also some ,nit been proved to be es with respect to the r speaker had no rigl Cu; gee, est " 11 1 Moms " ilk li alt ISOI re IOtO a petOtititt to ini jogai le i & i* ' Italie of Lords, cc else Ail At . cimiiiie etlieetirg relative thereto, to sleroidte - :47by tie kftereed." • l 'ilf ArEagft hati4 : llV a I.!*:,e. RI ' t!* " 1 # l ,• Z . t.i:' , 's:Cttti flOvse in akiik 4tF Tiikeir ilia "tessive spoeckd whiChil 4.. trot *G .- 1 / 2 . .. Ir 41.1 „... k siiiooik which has been a - Mille' ' st;ulsjgying—neoeasarily inipl, ltd kepis* clirse or misconduct, in the , . ak . .by iii, id Itr . oLthe Ktittse of Lordt or tlie 14 ' ' - the HOOse will • not illikt I ' •' *shoos of offering my *Othlsi. -` • be sorry gibe 'user ciii* or iiroc' elect% whichlM been sit ith . liSiii to the charades- ti the House ; Airtln;fr4ns all scant:Amu on this, and ok/it:lineal questkin which Was toot 14 slieedi, hint which we are not now f: discust PAiaiiiiiial. as I have been it at . Mt atiatitilti* -4qttoe_ of its sentin litiost tend4ct was dOw to on snlid dimt,al kre:unds, I limit datiess Ow I,crii the justice and Orin dealing of" WI the Maras that have occupied the ittentiusi -of the nitmucu,ll "'"Jr. 5"n.. T.''.. i--- - --- - , --, ftw ie e • color its Amfinn. may be not k e J i n the sideration. AOnerfog. howeVer, to those laws-by vented from delivering it, because lie, cc mature con• from that which should be 'the conduct ot :every in a CAmmittee, est gpliikee's 'BOLA Oil the ciecaiion. At least it is so will ~...__ ; d t the Thiene, the Parliament, and the C.9 - r sideration, might have thought it not quite constito. Speaker. He had used his ears to hear, and biseyes had r..at any power i • viveluitpn in the inn* which.ire are accustonsed to Leminem'___c if " 0- . 1 CIAISI t r i art! ma d e fiinclawmfigalif c l ona l . He might have thought, that to deliver it to see, as a private Member of Parliament. and used what the House lig ellti4iler nor Tat lai:a An *n4 matters. to ;he rolwwW , „ j .we Pait ) 16 1 cn.ttlift,e_d.s6ll4aw that time might have been inconsistent with his duty. This his tongue, as Speaker, to give utterance 40 that Crown was sulkiest . 3,. ~ , i it, of , the g oo . * of Lords m o t t i peet h et are whn iOTirleilse 4,. .i . , .ote.., yorunliction '140014 be' precedent, then, on.which the Right Hon. Gentleman which he had no right to state—Weer, 4ear, Leer.) not, as King, to cal t irtie.' 1 entefed. In flat ell''' to whi6 ati ... t11464 .,--, . 156 ri adill4 . ...i f *". .„ - If 2 T:ln wen• • - agui...itirisik. . , tioa. see med . to have laidso much stress, be should dismiss This was the view he had taken of that pat tor the legal or parliament refit ' is trs4 made , 141 : 4 4 4. 0?1ts laid down: Ca MIS rea4r i IFIUNIRO:# _ lire* EevifFelesn. an as trralevint.—As to the other precedent, from the Right Hopi. Cer.tleman's speech. If he appliethirn. to communicate to o i t pi.. . A n ut t i o r •u o o i Ki lt i f p i t i t o n& wfOhts s . a_r„trliat . irte - etf . bil• to .:. toe kril "her' side kxf tile water, he chotild offer a few observe • sett to the other topics contained in it, he might join .• , „ ~n a , t p• ' ndged a , fr at , ctistonutty on ; h e sc .. 6l_, trt t 4 ..t. , . 4. .. ~., !a% .6 . vi , Mot. With all due deference, be did not find that his Noble Friend in praising the eloquence with which 'ititl'altei 'ming the 'ove rt ply on the lash at* Peza i r, h ;. .., . n .. :. 11 I. Slit. .. A le / 01 : 404 ' the Aral of Mr. Foster *as at Nil similar to that the Right Hon: Gentleman had descanted on the intl- . y ot st Non, tor th i5....., t 0 i n ik e a a a eec h .at did - no!' ... ~ . ,„ i , - . ~.. l • ,g 3 9 4 7 6. ?4 l4 Asishert by the Right Hon. Gentleman at the of p ant achievements of o ur , 'army, which Ltd so ircr .' ' i..... i f& .4 motion ot the Nobl vets a censure, bir I.t: bar of the 1-16uie of s - r: 1 1 9 ekher it7l .'F - aidhtelY . 4 -61 _ 1 ,1 61 4 •A l • ' :v. F! " . . ' a t bit", . Wl* the last : . , ; The it:ight Hon. Gentleman. op, quently demanded the thanks of the House—those . ... ••.• - - t w ig a mis:Pnceill tin ~iii of the subject fps - Oir of the Aid itselr, or, w'''‘'g l '' ': 1 i•• '. . onl 91 tee on OMNI! is ~ - hprepentative, end lupporting the dig. recorded congratulations called forth by reset events. LAW Ckathern• w ..oiii i 4t the eibie aai &, - ioa; licapitulAng the nit '' ' aE be eitiesdir the nett et the 3 atate, stated wkat the Houle tad and now happily terminated by the glary of the allied • • I - eathre:fittlrawasthichhahv: .. • . . •• ' c . . 11 1111111111111111