Star. — London, England, 1821-11-13 00:00:00

DISTURBANCES IN IRELAND. ri ng THE LIMERICK CHRONICLE OF WEDNESDAY. The fullmsing attacks and robberies give a mdan daeli view of the disorganised state of the county of Lime. ick :--The house of Mr. Jona CLEARY, of Bul ooden, in this county, was entered on Monday night, t y ga ng of armed ruffians, and robbed of two modtets.—Sunday week, about nine o'clock at night, tie h ou se of Mr. ADAM MILLER, at Garrainrcie, in this comity, was attacked by a large party, in search 0/fire-arms. On MILLER'S refusing them, the party commenced breaking down the wall of the house with ccow.hars, which they accomplished, and succeeded is ta ki ng tivn gttn., two pistols, and one sword. Th e following robberies have also taken place in the ne i g hbourhood of Bruit; and scarcely a night the e ,at armed parties, mounted, do not parade the roads from Hospital to Croom : —From the house orParnicK GRADY, ur guns have been taken; arid hen , th e houses of JA M ES COLMAN, JAMES HEItLIIIY, j o gs MoLoNv, DENIS KENNANR, and JAMES C. Dioitaissy, oile gun each. Saturday night about half a hundred weight of t a d was taken off the rear of the artillery barracks i o t his city. Sunday night a similar robbery was• co mmitted on the roof of the Butterweigh-house, in Nigh-street; these outrages are authenticated on oath. COUNTY OF CORK. - - - - - The . lawless system of robbery and murder has r eplied a considerable part of this County, and it would be difficult to say how far it will extend. On soday night, amumerous body of mounted banditti s nacked the house of a Tythe-proctor, at Liscarol, w hich they demolished. He was absent, and hence saved his life. They next visited the house of a wit.. mes on a late criminal trial, and having found the un fortunate victim a home, they cruelly punished hi m , and made him swear that he would take his oath in the Parish Chapel not to disclo e their names. A force of forty soldiers and ten police was posted in the immediate vicinity of this outrage. but it seems, they could net afford the necessary protection. Within a few days, all the Gentry of Dultallow were deprived of their arms, except a few whose h ou ses were deemed Inc) strong for attack. Several Gentlemen were 'robbed of arms in broad day, and such is the effect of intimidation that the Magistrates are afraid to perform their duty. The banditti make requisitions of horses from the more respectable class of farmers, who are ordered to have them, with saddle and bridle, in readiness. The dread of assas sination overawes the peaceable, and those who can afford the expense, take shelter in the towns and populoos kevices from Gibraltar to the 2.3c1 ult. were re ceived yesterday. They state, as intelligence horn Malta, that his Excellency Sir THOMAS MAITLAND sailed born thence for Corfu on the 24th September. Pinions to his departure it was made known, that cm his return, which would be early in November, be would take into immediate consideration the pos sibility. or expediency of laying open, in part or in whole, and under what restrictions or limitations, the corn trade, which has from ancient times been held as a monopoly in that island. All ships and vessels from Gibraltar, with clean bills of health, were to perform seven days quarantine at Malta ; and those from the coast of Spain, also with clean banf health, fifteen days. Private letters from Ma laga mentioned, in contradiction to the statements of the Board of Health, cases and deaths by the yellow kw in that city. One of them in particular stated, wader date of the 13th October, that the writer, trig credit to those statements, had recently re tuned from the country to Malaga, but finding that his former apprehensions were too well founded, he %tended to remove again on the next day. Daeav• LANE THEATRge--.TheTragedy of Richard ths Third was last night performed, the Duke of Glestater by Mr. Kr,ty, the only actor at present on &stage who p.'urtrls with due effect the various shades which miligle in the character of Richard. Mr. LIAN has tardy afforded us such unalloyed pleasure as we last night derived from his pet form er'. It was, in every re.pect, excellent. The cool, mantic murderer, whose jests are the precursors of hkedy deeds—the wheedling, specious lover, and the bold uailaunted warrior, were represented with extra • ordinary fidelity. On other occasions, we have known Ur. Inn's voice to fail towards the end of this la borious character; but last night his energies, mental and physical, did not abate one jot, from the moment he appeared until the curtain fell. Perhaps he never Played the 'character so well, certainly never better. Genius shone pre-eminent in every scene, and the audience hailed it, as genius should be hailed, with rapturous applause.—The Farce of the Adopted Child followed, in which Mr. LOVEDAT, from the Edinburgh Theatre, sustained the part of Michael, in a manner ettretnely characteristic of the rude but generous heart of a sailor. The House was crowded. Miss Symms, on Thursday morning last, dis played an eminent instance of that unaffected and un assuming. kindne s s of disposition for which she is so !uglily valued. Some of her friends having taken her to view the Blind Asylum, in Liverpool, it was inti mated to her that sevetal of the musical pupils had often expressed a strong wish to hear a specimen of her admirable voice and skill. Without farther en treaty, she proposed to gratify them on the spot, and the blind pupil, of both sexes, being gathered to tether, she sung the exquisite duet of Love.in thine /et assisted by Mr. C. SMITH. The raptures of her *siring and interesting audience were more than, wally excessive, in proportion as the sensibility of the UN % in the blind, more than usually intense. 0u) M A sprightly writer expresses his opi &Met old maids in the following manner :—I am Maned to believe that many of the satirical aspen limes cast upon old maids tell more to their credit than is generally imagined. Is a woman remarkably treat in her person, "she will certainly die an old maid." Is she particularly reserved towards theother met " she has all the squeamishness of an old maid." is she frugal in her expenses, and exact in her do mestic concerns, " sbe is cut out for an old maid.", And if she is kindly humane to the animals about' her, nothing can save her from the appellation of an old maid." In short, I have always found that, 'leafless, modesty, economy, and humanity, are the never failing characteristics of that tcarible creature an is old maid!" SPORTING INTELLIGENCE. BETTING AT TATTEM ;SALL'S, NOVEMBER Is. 10 to 1 apt Landscape 17 to 1 apt Pawn ID to 1 agst Speoraz (taken) 12 to 1 apt turd Grosvenor 's 13 to 1 agst 31arcellits (taken) two (taken) 14 to 1 apt Frolic (taken) SO to 1 apt Niobe. 16 to 1 apt Bess OACIL Seven to one on the Field. IT. MIL STAKES (nOIILASTER). Eight to one on the Field. WORCESTER NOVEMBER MEETING. BATUILDAY, /IMMO= Seven heroes started for a Sweepstakes of Ags. each, with 2Ovs. added, one mile and a quarter beats, rode by Gentlemen which was admig Ally contested, and won by Mr. l'asnov, riding his grey gelding Annie, beating six others, after three beats. - . - - For a Sweepstakes of sgs. each, with 2.5 r. added, one mile heats, eight hoyes started, and, after three brats, run in a ca. fital style, was won by Mr. Mirrvotes br. c. ilahton. A Match for 50gs. one mile and a quarter brat, for which six started, was wan by Mr. ileAmsswolva's b. c. Vampyre, beat fog five others.—An accident happened to Mr. Caiman's eh. f. Molly Hraw, who fell between the two chairs 4 when riding se cond to Vampyre, or it is supposed she would have won the &ales ; it was manfully contended for, and nothing but hard running the order of the day in every race. Sweepstakes of sgs. esch, and a Cup of 20gs. for half-bred horses, the.property of residents in the city of Worcester. Six horses started, and after three heats Mr. Moatorox won, riding his b. m. Roadstead. MALTON COURSING (YORKSHIRE). Wednesday, at General INrom's annual Coursing, the follow ing matches were run between English and Scotch dogs :—Mr. Little's Flora and Mr. Rigg's Spying undecided; General Dirom's Downer and Mr. Jackson's Miss O'Neill undecided ; Mr. Rod's Rodney and Mr. Lockerby's undecided; Mr. Dixon's lifter I beat Mr. J. Robinson's dog ; Mr. Bewley's Comet beat General Dirom's dog ; General Dirom's Swift beat Mr. Itigg's Brandy ; Mr. Jackson's Min O'Neill beat General Dirom's Downer; Mr. Little's Flora beat Mr. Rigg's Spring; Mr. Jackson's Miss O'Neill and General Dirom's Downer undecided; Mr. Clapperton's Rob Roy beat Nit.. Bewley's Spring; Mr. Bud's Rodney beat Mr. Lockerby's Spring ; Mr. liewley's Comet beat General Dirum's dog ; Mr. Coulthard's Rake beat Mr. Rubinson's dog ; General Dirom's Swift beat Mr. ltigg's -Brandy ; and Mr. Rod's Rodney beat Mr. Ciapperton's Rub Roy. Though po less than 57 hares were started, only 15 were bounded as above, and only five of which were killed. 'The General, during the day, evinced his usual kindness, and was very attentive to the regulations of the sport. HUNTING. Ili, 1 1 tram's Stag-hounds meet on Friday, at Salt Hill. Time alipperfield Harriers (I lerts) meet ou Friday, at Leaves deo Green, near Hunton Bridge c Monday, 19th, at Lattimer's Bottom, opposite Lord G. CAVENDISH'S Park ; and on Friday, the 113 d, at the KenneL Whenever the state of the weather will not allow of bunting on the regular days, the hounds will go out no the Wednesday following, and always meet at the Kennel. The Hatfield Harriers meet to-morrow, at Park Car; on Friday, at Kpwarth Town. The Buckinghamshire Harriers meet on Friday, at Padbuty. Mr. Orawonvo's Hounds meet to-morrow, at Winwick War ren; Thursday, at liothierpe; Saturday, at Cransley; Monday, the 19th, at Brampton Wood; Wednesday, the 21st, at Lam port; Thursday, the 22d, at Brockhall ; and Saturday, the 24th, at Stone Wood. The Duke of Gaarron's Hounds meet to-morrow, at Strat ford Hill ; on Friday, at Whistley Wood. The Oakley Hounds meet on Thursday, at Pick's 11111 Bun; on Saturday, at Aloultioe. Mr. CONY Lei linunds meet to-m Saturday, at Thoruwood Common. r, at Caufield Hart ; on SHOOTING. Two Gentlemen, Mr. C— and Mr. J. C. K sporting together upon the same manor, in the parish of Werth, near East Grinstead, Sussex, on Friday last killed without a dog the following variety of game :-13 pheasants, 4 partridges, 5 hares, 8 rabbits. 2 woodcocks, I snipe, and a wild duck. A brace of woodcocks were shot. on Monday aennight in a field of turnips near Exnitig, by Mr. Tnanat Gammon, of New market. A rare instance of so early a migration of these birds in that part of the country, and rather singular they should be shot from such a situation. SINGULAR OCCURRENCE HAWK AND Likaa.--The following occurrence took place at Ranshaw, near Allerton Park, Yorkshire :—A few days ago, a hawk was observed pursuing a sky-lark, and when the affrighted warbler appeared to have little or no chance of escaping from its rapacious foe, it fortunately sought refuge in the house of Mr. Parvin, at Allerton Park, and suffered Mrs. Parvin to take it in her baud and caress it. After remaining on the arm of its fair protector for a short time, the hawk disappeared, and the lark soon after took wing, and sprightly soared aloft. THE TWO HUNDRED MILES MATCH IN THREE DAYS COMPLETED. Mr. CONYNONAII, the pedestrian, who started from West minster-bridge at nine o'clock, on Thursday morning, for Two Hundred Guineas, completed it on Sunday morning between Harehatch and Maideuhead, mach fatigued. He did 69 miles in the first 24 hours, travelling through Horsham and Chichester. Ile did 68 miles through Winchester, Ramsey, and Salisbury, to near Devizes, the second 24 hours; and the remaining 63 miles in 23 hours. He travelled the first two days nearly five milts an hour, and took six hears rest ; but the third day he got sore, and had only three boors rest. WRESTLING. A CHAI.LENOI.--John Welshman, of Haron, in Cumber land, challenges any man in Cumberland to wrestle, best out of five throws, for any sum from 15 to 50 guineas. BOXERS. Belcher and Harmer paid a visit to Neat, the Bristol pngilist, last week ; and at his Benefit (two in-goes, morning and night) they both set-to with him. He appears confident of statiliag the Gas. Neat intends to shew himself to the Loutanci-s a fortnight before fighting, in order to give them an opportunity of making up their minds about taking the great odds that are offered against him. It is expected to be a short fight, as both the combatants are known to be not elegant and sckutific, but dread fulantashing and decisive boxers. So severe was the fall of snow on Saturday and Sunday se'nnight, to the east and north of Langbolm, that many hundreds of sheep have been buried under it, d great number of which have not as yet been ex tricated ; it is feared many have been smothered. NONE BUT HIMSELF CAN BR HIS PARALLEL.—In front of Histes Office in Cornhill, are the words " All the Three 00,000 Prizes sold by Blstr, April, 1815." BISH sold the first and only £50,000 drawn in the present Lottery; and it he sells the other two, he will only have to alter April, 1815, to November, 1821. His are the only Offices that ever sold Three of 1,30,000 in one Lottery ; and his having sold the first in this, puts it out of the power of any one but himself to be his parallel. The princely Fortune of Thirty Thousand Pounds may be obtained, Next TUESDAY, for the small sum of Twenty-two Pounds Fourteen Shillings—a com fortable independence of Fifteen Thousand Pounds for 'Twelve Pounds Five Shillings; for Six Pounds Three Shillings, Seven Thousand Five Hunched Pounds ; for three Pounds Two Shillings and Six pence, Three Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty Pounds; and for One Guinea and a Half, Eighteen Hundred and Seventy-five Pounds; if bought at Errow's Lucky Office, 2, Cornhill, and Lombard sueet.-,Erros engages to invest the Prize Money in the Funds for his Friends who maybe so fortunate a, to obtain any of the above Capital him, at IIi• Offices, free of expense. LAW INTELLIGENCZ 'COURT OF CHANCERY, NOVEMBER 11. SCALES V. BARLow. The LORD CHANCELLOR, on coming into Court, addressed himself to Mr. Ching, and said - , that after reading the affidavits in this cause he had come to, the conclusion that the Court hid no jurisdiction to commit Joseph, the brother of Thomas Barlow. It did not appear that the order of the Master of the ! Rolls prohibited Joseph Barlow, as it did his bro ther, from having communication with Miss Scales. When the Court was called upon to commit a per son for contempt, it was necessary that the nature of the contempt should be expressly stated upon affi davit. Under the present circumstances be would advise Mr. Ching to amend his petition. Mr. CHINO replied, that he would adopt the sug gestion which his Lordship had thrown out. The LORD CHANCELLOR rose at one o'clock. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, NOVEMBER Is. AVA RIM V. SALT. This was a bill filed for relief to the plaintiff from a lease of lands in Derbyshire, on the ground of the lease having been fraudently obtained. The plain tiff, in 1816, when a young man of twenty-one, and serving as an officer in the army, granted a lease of the farms to Thomas Lee. The lease was afterwards sold by public auction to the defendant Salt. There was no evidence that Salt had notice of any inten tion of challenging the lease, and the bill as regarded him was dismissed. But against the assignees of Lee, who was bankrupt, it was contended that the plaintiff was entitled to relief. A few days before granting of the lease, the plaintiff received a loan of £lOO from Thomas Lee,, for which he gave his pro missory note. This was urged as a ground of suspi cion. Lee gave but aroo ; Salt paid 1.1,200 for the lease. This was alleged to •be evidence of fraud, since the consideration given was not adequate. It VW further stated that the plaintiff had employed no legal adviser, but trusted to Mr. Hicks, the soli citor of Thomas Lee. The YICE-CHANCELLOR, without hearing Counsel on the other side, dismissed the bill. The previous lending of money was an ingredient to prove fraud, but standing nakedly, as in this case, the Court could not attend to it. If a man chose to take less in the way of bargain than he ought to receive, or if he availed himself of no legal adviser when it was in his power to obtain one, the Court was not to re lieve him from the consequences of Ms Own improvi dence and negligence. There was no evidence that the plaintiff had been embarrassed or under any re straint. The bill was dismissed, and with costs, as it charged fraud. amain V. SUTLER AND OTHERS. Mary Wright had forsaken her late husband, John Wright, of Hull, and attached herself to a Thomas Johnson, in London, whose name she assumed. She had carried with her an infant son, John Wright.— The forsaken and injured husband died, leaving by his will the defendants Ms executors. They re covered the child from the profligate mother, and sent him to a 'chool at Horncastle ; they at the same time paid her all charges for the period she had maintained him. She contrived to get the son again taken away, and kept possession of him for some time. A bill had been filed in Chancery, and an order had been obtained to restore the child. The subject was now mentioned for the purpose of ob taining from the trustees the expenses of the mother in maintaining her son after she had the second time carried him away. Mr. FONBLANQUE supported the mother's claim ; Mr. AGAR opposed it, and stated, that Johnson having gone to America, she had lived with a baker in London, and took his name, and that she now again resumed the name of Wright. The VICE-CHANCELLOR.—Not a farthing —no, not one farthing can she have for any charges previously to the filing of the bill; and as she can claim nothing under the will, she cannot come before the Court but by petition for anything subsequent to that period. Mr. Ducawowrit stated, that the charges asked were incurred previously to the filing of the bill. Mr. FONBLANQUE said that be was to understand, then, that a petition might be presented respecting any charges subsequently. The Vics-Cuasceotant.—Yes, but I shall cllsralss it with costs, if the facts cannot be materially altered. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, NOVEMBER SEDITIOUS LIBEL—THE KING V. DAVID RIDGEWAY. Mr. BROUGHAM said, hehad Dow to apply to-their Lordships for a Rule to thew cause why the verdict which, in this case, was for the Crown, should not [be set aside, and a new trial granted, The case was tried before Mr. Justice Holroyd, at Lancaster, and was a prosecution against the defendant Ridgeway, by the Society known by the appellation of the Bridge-street Association, for a pretended seditious Pu l bl e c icat ot . il Jusrics—An indictment far a Ilbek I appOss. Mr. Blt01:0HAM—Yell. my Lord; and the adj air evidesee was that of a lad about IS years of age, E. named , clerk to Nadin, the attorney. The CHIRP Justin—Media, did you say? Mr. BROUGHAM—Yes, my Lord, the name is well known ; young Nadin is the attorney ; the old one, the thief-taker, has retired out of town. Evan Mil ler was the only witness at the trial to prove the iden tity of Ridgeway, the defendant. In the course of his evidence he swore that he called at Ridgeway's shop, is Manchester, on the 7th of March last. Ridgeway was a fustian-cutter, and was generally employed at the top of the house. His wife sold sand, brick-dust, potatoes, checks, threads, tapes, &c. and small books for children, amougst which were, Jack the Giant Killer, and Mother Shrpton l He did not pretend to any previous knowledge of the defend : ant, nor was the defendant confronted with him in Court at the time of the trial ; but it was necessary to establish that the shop was the defendant's, and that he sold the publication to the witness ; and to do this, Miller stated that he went to the shop of the defendant, where he saw a notice, in writing, pasted on one of the panes of the window, stating that the Address to the Rfformers tpight be had within; that he (Miller) went into the shop, and asked the defend ant for The New Year's Address to the Reformers V I Great Britain? The defendant said, he had not The New }ear's Address, but was writing to London, and should have it by the end of the week. He then, went away, and called at the end of the week, but; _lse defendant had not received his parcel from Lon lon. At a subsequent time * however, the. witness called again, and got it, and this was the alteged li bel. The witness received the two Addresses. accord ing to his own statement, at the same time ; and he (Mr. Brougham) contended at the trial, that even al lowing the fact of the witness having purchased the publication, as he stated, still there was no evidence to shew that the defendant was at all acquainted with its contents; and there was no allegation that the Address to the Reformers contained anything illegal. It was material that Miller should shew that it was the defendant's shop at which he purchased the Sup posed libel ; and tti effect that object, he said, in one part of his evidence, " It may be proper to observe, that there was a sign over the door of the shop, with the words, "David Ridgeway, dealer in tea, caffee, snuff; tobacco, irc." He (Mr. Brougham) had nor► the affidavit of Ridgeway, positively denying that there was any such sign over the doer at the time Miller swore to. There had been such a sign, but it was taken down a week before Christmas, in conse quence of his having declined dealing in tho.e arti cles. He also possessed the affidavits of James and Mei& Daniels. The Cum Jusrice then inquired what affidavits the present application was founded on? Mr. BROUGHAM said he had the affidavit of James Daniels, and Maria his wife, who had tor several years lived opposite the defendant, and who both swore to the sign having been removed from over the door a week before Chtistmas, and that it had never been replaced since. He had also the affidavits of two other persons, Ann Miuenger, and Jane Mur dock, .to the same fact. Mr. Justice BAYLEY.—MiIIer stated, that the de fendant's wife was present part of the time, when he was at the defendant's to purchase the libel; does she join in the defendant's affidavit denying the sale? Mr. BROUGH A my Lord; and your Lord .ship sees Miller does not state that she knew what passed, though she was present some part of the time. Mr. Justice Boss. asked what the defendant said in his affidavit as to his knowledge of the witness? Mr. Baoucti M said the defendant positively swore that till he saw the witness in Court, when under exa mination, which he did fora short time, he never re collected having seen him before in his life. The Cilia F Jusrice.—The fact of the sign having been removed, as sworn by the defendant, you say, is confirmed? Mr. BROUGHAM—Yes, my Lord, by the affidavits of four other persons. The Crime Jurrics.—You may take your Rule to skew cause.—Rule Nisi granted. MURRAY V. HUTCHINSON. This was an action by an innkeeper of White haven, to recover the amount of his bill for entertain ing the friends of the defendant, who attended his father's remains to the grave. The sum demanded was 1:2: Ss. part of which waecomposed of a sum of Ss. for spirituous liquors suppled to the mourners oft the melancholy occasion. At' the trial before Mr. Justice BAYLEY, at the last Assizes for the County of Cumberland, the plaintiff recovered only the suns 'of Cl:lss. the Learned Judge being of opinion that the plaintiff could not recover the Ss. for the spirits, being contrary to the letter of the 24 Geo. 11. c. 40, s. 12, which declares that no person or persons what soever shall be entitled to maintain any action to re cover any demand on account of the sale of any spirituous liquors, unless the debt shall be contracted at one time, and shall amount to the sum of twenty shillings or upwards. Mr. D. T. JONES now mbved to enter the verdict for £:2:3s. with a view to costs, and made two points. Ist That an innkeeper, bona„ entertaining his guests in his house, and charging for the spirituous liquors drank, was not within the contemplation of the Act, which clearly had reference only to retailers of spit its to the lower orders; and 2dly, that as the spirits were not supplied to the defendant himself, who was not pre. sent at the funeral, the case was not within the statute, He brought the cases of Jackson v. Attrill, Peake's N. P. C. 180. Scotu', Gilimore, 3 Taunt. 228: Spencer v. Smith, S Campbell, 9. and Gilpin v. Ren die. Selw. N. I'. 71. under the review of the Court. The e Court were dearly of opinion that the caw being witthin the express words As well as spirit of the Act, the-verdict ought not to be increased.-- Rule refused. IWARTRIN V. TAPLIN. This was an action in the case, for libel and defa mation; pas, the general issue and justification. The cause was tiled before Baron Gattaow, at the last Assizes for Oxford, and a verdict taken fog the plaintiff for £5O. It appeared that the plaintiff was nurserymaid to the detendant, wbo is a Magistrate of the county of Northampton, and that upon her referring to him for a character, when she had left him and was getting another place, he wrote a letter in which he painted her as the vilest of women. He concluded by saying, that instances of her misconduct were easily capable of proof. At the trial he endeavoured to prove these instances of misconduct on the plaintiff's part, but totally failed. The Jury, therefore, gave the verdict against him. Mr. CROSS moved to set aside the verdict, on the ground that malice was not proved against the defen dant. The Learned Counsel was proceeding with his argument, when he was interrupted by the Court, who said they were summoned to another place. The argument stands over. LIABILITY OP COACH PROPRIETORS. Mr. SCARLETT obtained a role against the decision 'of the Chief Justice in the case of Horne and Hall, by which it was held that the printed notices given lby the proprietbrs of stage-ceache not to be answer l!able for packages above the value of £5 is sufficient, uniess the parcels are entered and paid for accordingly.. STEWART V. BELL. The Souotrott-GricguAt. moved for a rule fcr a new trial in this case, which was on a policy of in surance, and a verdict given for the plaintiff. The goods insured had been taken to a port beyond the rdestination, and in sending them by smaller vessels ( they were lost. It was proved that this was the usu 4 !course of traffic at , the places in question, ar.d the Court were of opinion that the underwriters were bound to know this usage, and refused to disturb the verdict. • SHEPHERD P. KING. The plaintiff had purchased from the defendant a vessel described as copper-fastened, but to be taken with ad defects. It was afterwards discoverer ;fiat 'she was not copper-fastened, and tl.e plai,,iifr brouAtt Mis action ou the breach of contract. The Jury fouaci reil, let Itil lent rM a of be neo :dig. I too, t ICI