Star. — London, England, 1823-07-26 00:00:00

ASSIZES: . CROYDON, JULY 25. MURDER OF' MRS. RICHARDS, AT CLAPHAM. Philip Stojill and Charles Keppetll were indicted for the wilful murder of Elizabeth Richards, by suf focating her with an apron, at Clapham, on the Bth of April last. The intense interest which this case excited is almost incredible. Every part of the Court was, at an early hour, crowded to excess; and when the doors were opened to the Public it was a useless ceremony, as there were then no More accommodations for the spectators. Even the Gentlemen of the Bar were obliged to make a special application to the Bench to be accommodated with sitting room. The Gentle men connected with the Press were absolutely ex cluded by the pressure of the crowd ; but upon an in timation being given to C. H. TURNER, Esq. the High Sheriff, of their situation, he with promptitude and the greatest politeness did everything in his power col affOrd them such accommodations as circumstances avould permit. The majority of the crowd consisted of Ladies, who had influence enough to pre-occupy every desirable seat in the Court before the doors were opened. As soon as something like order was restored, the prisoners • were placed at the bar. Both were very young men, the olde,t not being more than twenty one. Their deputtment was feral, correct, and be coming their awful situation. On the arraignment, the prisoner Studell pleaded Not Guilty to the in dictment for murder, but said he was Guilty of the robbery in the house of the deceased. He was re minded, that he was then called upon to plead only to, the alleged murder; to which, with a firm voice, he pleaded Not Guilty, and put himself upon GOD and the country. The other prisoner put an a like plea. They were then arraigned upon a second in dictment, charging them with a burglary and rob bery in ahe house .of the deceased on. the same day ; to which they severally pleaded Nut Guilty. At half past nine the trial commenced. The Jury were Gentlemen of respectable . appear ance, and throughout the trial paid the most anxious attention to die case on both sides. Mr. CONIYN opened the case .with great temper and moderation, and called upon the Jury, in an earnest exordium, to dismi.s from their minds all pi-econ _ _ ceived impressions which they might have imbibed from the improper, and indeed unlawful, publication of the proceedings which had taken place before the committing hlagisti rtes prior to the trial. Upon this point the Learned Counsel observed with gie•at earnestness, and insisted that the publication of an ex-parte statement of proceedings before Magistrates against a prisoner, was a common law offence, and indictable, as had been held by the highest authority. Such publications were destructive of the first princi ples of justice, because it was utterly impossible for the human mind to reject those impressions which they were calculated to produce against unfortunate persons, labouring, perhaps, under an unjust accusa tion, and subjecting them to a degree of prejudice , inconsistent with the impartial administration of jus tice. The avidity of public curiosity upon matters of this kind, might, perhaps, afford some excuse; but the interests of justice, a rational feeling of humanity towards the accused, ought to suggest a course far . different, and prevent the disclustne of exparte state ments until the solemn deliberation .of a Court and Jury upon the offence of the alleged crimidal. In this case the most exaggerated statements had been sent forth by the public press, and he earnestly im plored the Jury to dismiss, if possible, the impres sions uhich they were calculated to excite, and bring their sober judgment to an impartial consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case submitted to them as a judicial tribunal. The Learned Counsel then entered into a detail of the circumstances of the case (the particulars of which have already been ab solutely forestalled and anticipated in the police re ports), and concluded by au earnest appeal to the Jury to decide the guilt or innocence of the prisoners upon the evidence they should hear disclosed on oath. The evidence against the prisoners ranged itself under four heads : first; the facts and circumstances of the murder of Mrs, Richards ; second, the testi mony of Robert Scott, an accomplice of the pri soners; third, the voluntary coufession of the prisoner StoiDill; and fourth, the testimony of a great num ber of witnesses, Arroborating the testimony of Scott and the confession of Stollen, in many collateral but material circumstances. A brief outline of the lead ing features of the case will, for the present purpose, be sufficient to recal the attention of the Public to the atrocious crime with which the .prisoners stood charged. The deceased, Mrs. Elisabeth Richards-, %% as a widow woman of small income, and turned of seventy-four. She resided in a cottage, forming one of a row of houses in the Clapham-road, near Acre lane, on the left-hand side going lio n s Loudon. An elderly woman, named Bell, lodged with her, who WAS in the habit of going to a Dissenting Chapel on certain evenings in the week. The deceased was occasionally visited by a young worhan named Sophia Jones, a dress-maker, whose constant practice was to call upon the deceased every Tuesday evening, for the purpose of reading for her amusement. On Tues day evening, the Sth of April, Mrs. Bell left the cot tage of the deceased, for the purpose of going to Chapel as usual. The deceased, who occupied the front parlour, which opened upon the road, without a hall or passage, fastened up her doors. Between seven and eight o'clock Miss Jones called to read to her, according to her practice. She knocked at the door, and received no answer. The knocks were re peated, but without effect. Observing the door n,-r. to be fastened she pushed it open, and found every thing in dat kness. Site vthernently called to the de ceased, but received no reply ; upon entering she found the deceased lying on her back, apparently dead ; an alarm was given; the neighbours collected r and, upon entering, the deceased was found a lifeless corpse upon the floor. Her face was covered with a white apron, one end of which was twisted, and thrust down her throat, to. the extent of several inches. Upon pulling it out, the part which had been in her mouth was saturated with saliva, and stained. with blood, in consequence of the forcible expulsion of a tooth from her jaw, which was supposed to have been swallowed in the agonies of death. A surgeon was called in, but the spark of life was irrevocably extinct, though the body was still warm. These were the outlines of the circumstances and manner of the death. To prove that the prisoners were the perpetrators of the crime, the facts elicited in evi dence were these house had been robbed of a metal watch, some silver spoons, some wearing ap parel, and some money to the amount of about £3 10s. On the table, in the apartment, was found a brown paper parcel, addressed as follows:—" Mrs. Bell, hat Mrs. Richard's, Clapham, Surrey," which, upon being opened, was found to contain nothing but a piece of blank paper. Next day the police were on the alert. A reward of £2OO .was offered for the ap prehension of the murderers. Hall and Glennon, two active police officers, of the Public-office Union-hall, obtained information which led to the apprehension of the prisoner Stoffetl. He was taken into custody on the 11th of April, and brought before Mr. Allen, the Magistrate. The officer, Hall, being possessed of the brown paper parcel above mentioned, induced the prisoner to re-write the address written upon it, upon a piece of white paper, and having done so, spewed him the brown paper parcel, and asked him if he knew that? The prisoner, panic-struck by this testi mony of his guilt, which was found exactly to cor respond with the hand-writing upon the piece of paper, immediately said he certainly was concerned in the robbery, and was present at the murder of the deceased; and said he would confess all. The Magis trate; who wus present during part of the time the prisoner was writing, warned him that he was not bound to confess anything to his own prejudice: However, the prisoner desired his statement to be received, and he entered accordingly into a minute detail of the circumstances of the robbery and murder. In this he implicated Scott, Keppell, and a man named Prichard. From his statement, it appeared, that the robbery had been planned a month before it was effecteJ. No personal violence was intended to wards the deceased; but it was arranged that an entry into the house was to be gained by making up the brown paper parcel above mentioned, directed for Mrs. Bell, who was known to lodge with the de ceased. This plan was accordingly executed. The accomplice, Scott, knocked at the door, which was opened by the deceased, and upon receiving the parcel she took 'out her spectacles to read the address. Whilst sbe was engaged the rest of the party entered. The prisoner Stollen; who was her nephew, laid hold of her, told her no violence was intended, and ad vised her to make no noise. She was laid down on the floor, and the prisoner, Keppell, was left to keep her quiet, whilst the rest of the ganroceet4d to rifle the house. As soon as they had g accomplished this object, !they quitted the house, having the door ajar.. These, which were the only leading circum stances of Stoffell's confession, led to the apprehension of Keppell and Scott, who, after the robbery and murder, had gone with Prichard to Bristol, but re turned to London after a week's absence. The father of Scott, aho was a rat-catcher by trade, was in strumental to the detection of his son, on condition that he should be admitted as an approver. On the day fixed in the following week, Scott accordingly surrendered himself into the custody of Hall and Glennon, the officers, and was confined in the house of the latter for nearly two months before he was brought up for examination. This delay as to Scott, was suggested to be o ith a view to render him instru mental to the apprehension of Prichard, who had absconded, and was not yet brought to justice. The same information given by Stoffell led to the ap prehension of Keppell, who, being brought before the Justice, desired to hear Stoffell's statement read over to him, which was accordingly done. He was about make an admission tending to implicate himself, when the Magistrate, at the suggestion of Mr. An drews, the. Counsel, who was attending the Office at Union Hall; upon another case, told him that any confession or statement he should make would be ad duced in evidence against him on his trial ; he there fore declined saying anything. The accomplice Scott made a full confession of the robbery and murder, which, in the details, did not differ materially from the statement of Stoffell. Throughout the whole transaction it was quite manifest that the death of the deceased was not originally contemplated, and that the fatal termination of her life seemed to have arisen from a(}esire to prevent any interruption whilst the desperate gang were accomplishing the robbery. A great number of witnesses were examined in sup port of the fourth head of evidence, with a view to corroborate the accomplice and the confession of the prisoner SLoffell. It was stated by the accomplice that the plunder had been sold to a man named Par kins, who kept an iron-stall and rat Shop in Ball alley, in the Mint, in the Borough. This person was called as a witness, but denied all knowledge of the transaction. In the course of the trial, Mr. Serjeant Omsr.ow animadverted in strong terms of reprehension upon the practice of publishing Police Reports of cases' !Nought ex-paste before the Magistrates, and ob served that it was a matter which ought to be taken notice of by the Attorney-General. In the time of Mr. Wallace, the Attorney-General, no such publica tions ever took place. The case for the prosecution being closed, the pri soners were called upon for their defence. The pri soner Keppel replied that he had nothing to say, but that he was entirely innocent of this murder. The prisoner S.offell said that he !rad nothing to add to what he had already spoken. Mr. Serjeant ONsLow then summed up the evi dence with the greatest minuteness. The Jury asked leave to retire, and, after being absent about 35 minutes, returned with a verdict of Guilty against both prisoners. The Clerk of the Arraigns then asked the prisoners , what they had to say why sentence of death should not be pasted upon there On their giving no answer, silence was proclaimed in Court, and Mr. Serjeant ()snow having put on , the black cap, proceeded to address them In nearly the following terms: " You Philip Stoffell, and you Charles Keppell, after an investigation into your case, full and as minute as it was possible to be by a Jury, who, as I could not help observing, paid the most unwearied attention to the mass of evidence which came before them, have; after due delibe ra ti on on the part of that Jury, bad a verdict of Guilty re turned against you both. Yours, Charles Kep pell,, there can be no doubt, was the hand which occa sioned the death of this unfortunate old woman, and immediately afterwards, when an expres s io n was used indicative of a hope that she had not been murdered, you used language which shews a heart the most un feeling and the most depraved. When you were asked whether the life of this poor defenceless oli woman was or was not taken away you said, in terms which I cannot repeat, ' What odds is it !' I did not think that there was any being in human shape, who could talk in a straiu of such levity of such an atrocious crime within so short an interval after its commission. Philip Stoffell, though you were not the immediate cause of the death of this aged woman, still you were the planner and contriver of this trans action, which terminated so fatally, and therefore for all its lamentable consequences you art justly answer able. Your case is marked with many circumstances of aggravation. You stood in a situation of consan guinity to the unfortunate deceased. Whether you knew her or not, I cannot say; but you were the means of getting admission into the house, and there fore unto you her death is principally owing." The Learned JUDGE then stated the sentence, or dering their execution on Monday next, and giving over their bodies to the surgeons for dissection. The trial closed at half-past six in the evening. Both the prisoners, during the time that the Jury were deliberating on their verdict, and also at the. l moment when it was delivered in, and subsequently whilst the Judge was passing sentence upon them, presented an aspect almost entirely unmoved. There was, however, a transient flushing of blood under the eye, an involuntary biting of the lip, and also a slight convulsive tremor in the cheeks of Keppell, which shewed that, however hrmight wish to hide it, he still was agitated by some strong internal feeling. There was something peculiarly daring and reckless in his glance during the whole continuance of the trial; and yet we are inclined to think that if it had not been for a.catlike slyness, with which he some times eyed the witnesses that were produced against him, an indifferent spectator would have judged, from his countenance, that he was a person whose habits were that in general of a mild and gentle de scription. Of the innate ferocity of his disposition, however, few doubted who heard the evidence offered at his trial. if there were any persons in whose minds even the shadow of a doubt lingered, it was entirely removed by his exclamation to the Court on leaving it. As he descended the steps by which the prisoners leave the bar, he apostrophised the Learned Judge who had tried him, as a " b—y old rogue," and damned him and his b—y laws together. The ap pearance of Stoffell was much more savage than that of Keppell, but did not exhibit that careless hardihood which strtick you so forcibly in contemplating the features of his companion. His conduct during the trial was perfectly correct, add he frequently seemed impressed with a full sense of the dangerous situation in which he stood. We are informed that the property of Mrs. Rich ards has been considerably overrated in some of the Public Journals. Her whole income consisted of a life annuity of £75, out of which she had contrived by great parsimony to save a considerable sum. A legacy of £4OO, with all her silver plate, was left to Mrs. Martha Hooke, Stoffell's aunt, who appeared against him on the trial, and another of £2OO to Stof felt's mother, with all the furniture found in her house at Clapham. The old Lady had not seen Stoffell for seven years, and it is supposed he was, at the time of the murder, hardly known to her. Part of the scaffolding on which the spectators stood gave way during the trial, but no person was seriously hurt by it. John Lawrence was indicted on Thursday, under Lord Ellenborough's Act, for stabbing James Tay lor the younger, at Kingstou-upon-Thames, on the 17th of May last, with intent to murder him. Two other counts varied the terms of the charge accord ing to the language of the Statute. Mr. LAW colkducted the prosecution, and called several witnesses, from whose testimony it appeared that the parties were in a bumble condition of life. The prisoner had mart ied the prosecutor's sister. In consequence of a complaint that the prisoner had ill used his wife, the prosecutor called upon him, to re monstrate with him upon his conduct. Some angry words ensued ' • the prosecutor reproached t h e pr i soner for ill using his wife, and told him he must amend his behaviour ; the prisoner damned his own eyes, and told the prosecutor he had better mind his own business, and not interfere between man and wife. In reply to this, the prosecutor tauntingly told the pri soner he need not damn his own eyes, for be had but one, which was the fact. This incensed the prisoner, who aimed a blow at the prosecutor, but did not hit him. The mother of the prosecutor, who was present, beard the prisoner say he would do for the prosecutor, and she advised the latter to get out of the way, for the prisoner had a knife under his coat. The prosecutor did riot take the advice, but immedi ately struck the prisoner; a scuffle ensued ; both fell as the ground, the prosecu for being uppermost ; when the later arose, he observed blood issuing through his coat from his side, and then perceived that he was wounded. The prosecutor deposed, that he was not sensible of the wound till be saw the blood, and did not know but he might have fallen upon the knife which the prisoner had* his hand. Upon this statement of facts— Mt. Seijeant ONst.nw charged the Jury, that the prisoner was entitled to an acquittal on two grounds ; first, that supposing death had ensued, the offence would only have amounted to manslaughter; and second, it was at least doubtfUl whether the prosecu tor, in the scuffle, had not falleAto4 the knife, wi t h out any malicious inte n ti on on thesurt s of.the prisoner. The Jury found the prisoner I NDS Gray. • DERBY.. THE KING, ON THE PROSECUTION-OF COOKE V. SMITH. This case, which occupied the Court four hours, was an indictment for 'A libel, brought by the noto rious James SLatilp Sutton Cooke, against Mr. Smith, the publisher of the Pottery Gazette and Newcastk under-Lyme E. of which Mr. Amphlett is pr' prietor. Justifications of the several lib e l s we pleaded ; and, after the,ptiblicatiorthad been prnined r the justifications were its osoit parts established.. ( o' The Learned Judge etpressed himself to the.* that if there was a 'Mallet t:biktharY a farthing iiither realm, he should thiek.itfrilltlsidEcient for the ptilti= tiff.—Verdict for thi.pliiiritifr,:-Vite Farthing Ott. t' :pi two counts, andfc* . Via l alitefidaat generailiv . the others. ~: • ..- tit:•- .Et " ' coOlfi V. 'ampt. •-. This was another indictment, iirriilat to the pie Ceding, of flies ame pa r ty, b u t the plaintiff Witfi; so' fie wetiejfed with the result of the formers, 'chit he consented to have the same verdict recorded. • , UNIPTI?SI7'Y INTELLIGEJVCF. -ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTION. Rev. Peter Johnson, B.D. Fellow of Rxetertollege,Oxfur•Y has been instituted to the Vicarage of Wittenham Earls. Berk•. Rev. T. B. Newvll, M.A. of Christ Church, (Word, has hern institnted to the Perpetual Curacy of Salperten, Ghmeestershi rr . Rev. T. Adin, has lately been appointed to. the.: Rectory of Charlotte-Town, the capital of Prince Edward's Irand, Choy.. lain to his Majesty's forces St that Station, and a Missionary to' the bland. The Rev. Mr. Dibdin has been preserted by the Dean and Chapter of Canterbury, to the Vicarage , of Elting, Suffolk. The Rev. ‘Vadhant Piggott has presented the Rev. Thomas Shrapnel! Iliddulph to the Itecto7y of lirockley, in Somerset_ shire, void by the resignation of the Rev. J. Make. BIRTIIS. July 4, at Ballygiblin, in the county of Co', the Lady of W. Wrixon Becher, Esq. M. L'. of a daughter. July 8, at Geneva, the Lady of Major-Genesl Sir Win. In glis K.C. B. of a son. In glis, 8, the Lady of Capt. F. W. Austen, R.N. of a son. MARRIED. Rev. Thomas Harrison, of Tivetshall Parsonage, Norfolk, te' Frwzes, eldest daughter of Mr. Daniel Cooper. At Harrold, Bedfordshire, the &v. J. Walker, to Miss Er Brown, both of that plac e . At toke Church, William Lloyd, Esq. R. N. of Torpoint e to Mrs. Pryor], widow of Mr. Pryn n , R. N. I Tuesday, at Ealing, Lieut. William Farquharson, it. N. to Mar garet Mabelle, daughter of Frederick Cooper, Esq. ofJamaica. Tuesday, at St. Lawrence, in Thanet, the Rev. Miles BLoil e B.D. Fellow and Tutor of St. John's College, Cambridge, aid Rector of !Alley, in Hertfordshire, to Ann, youngest datight,r of *I-liomas Templeman, Esq. of C‘nyngham House, liamsgai, Thursday, at Newington, Oxfordshire, the Rev. James Stuait Murray Anderson, M. A. of Balliol College, Oxford, to Ilarbata Charlotte, second daughter of the late George Wroughton, Esq. of Newington-House, and of Aldwicke-Hall, Yorkshire. Tuesday, at Ipswich, Mr. J. A. Nash, of Wymondham, Norfolk, to Mias Mary Notcutt Gender, only daughter of the late Mr. James Conder, of the for Mer place. Tuesday, at Headington, near Oxford, the Rev. Philip Bliss, LL. D. Fellow of St. John's College, Oxford, and Sub-Librarian of the Bodleian, to Sophia, second dau g h ter o f • t h e late Rev. Robert Barter Bell, M.A. formerly Fellow of New Collyge, Oxford, and of Windlesham, Surrey. DYED. Monday se'nnight, at Leamington, Warwickshire, in his 72.1 year, the Rev. John Gooch, M.A. of Christ Church, Oxford, Archdeacon of Sudbury, Rector of Great and Little Saxliushaat,, Norfolk, and of Benacre, Suffolk. Tuesday, at Ludlow, the Rev. T. C. Rogers, M. A. Rector of Huntspill, Somersetshire, and late Fellow of Balliol Col4ege. April 30, at the Cape of Good Hope, Captain Pearson, late Commander of the I lonourable Company's ship General Hewitt. February 23, at Cape Coast Castle, James Swanzy, Esq. and on the 3d of June, his son, Mr. Henry Swanzy, on his passage thence to England, in the ship Caledonia. At South Luffenham, Rutlandshire, owing to a fall from her horse, Miss Trollope, aunt to Sir J. Trollope, Bart. July 12, at the advanced age of JOS, at Tynllechwedd, in tke pariah of Llandderf.:l, Merionethshire, Mrs. Elizabeth Elk.. She enjoyed excellent health till within a few days of her death, and her intellects were perfectly sound to the last. Lately, at Glanllyn House, Merionethshire, in his 68th year, Griffith Richards, Esq. upwards of forty year. agent to Sir W. W. Wyhn Bart. Er In the S:ar of Saturday last, on the authority of the ar fon/ Herald, we inserted an account of the death of the Rev. David Jones, at Bronmeirig. This, we understand, is incor rect. It should have been tile Rev. David Williams, 51. A. late Fellow of Wadbam College, Oxford, and Head Mastcs of Ystrad Meirig Grammar School. NEWG ATE AXD LEA DIM' ALL MARK STS, JULY 25. Beef 0 5 4d to 3s WI Veal ..... 441 to Ss Od Mutt0n....... 2s 4d to 3s ad Pork ...... ...2s 441 to 3s 8.1 Lamb - 2s ad t o 4s ed. PRICES or HAY AND S f RAW YESTERDAY. • Sr.JA M ES'S. WIIITEVC • PILL. • Hay 31153 Od to 51 8s Od I Hay 31 10s to 51 101a114 Straw 21 25 Od to 21 I.ls ed Straw 11 es to 21 its 104 Clover 41109 Od t o 51 1 5 5 tki Glover 41 20s to 61 ♦O4 PRICE or TA LLOW, SOAP, Sce. per 11416. Town Tallow 393 Od Ditto tough ...... .. ..... .. l9s Yellow Russia ... White ditto Soap ditto Melting Stuff... ..... ... 28 s Od i Palm ..... ....... ..... .. PR" LICE OF CANDLES--From Tallow Chandlers' Haft. Candles, per doz. 8s 6d—Moulda, 10$ Od; 6d. per dans allowed for reedy money. PRICE 0 ' )41111 , BAC& Kent 6l 6$ to al Os Sussex 6l Os to 71 Essex Foreign lIOPS. NEW POCKETS. Kent ...... 6! 10s to 81 0 Sussex ...... 6! 2s to 71 188 Essex ..... 6! 10s to SI Os Farnham... 91 Os tol2l t 9 I'RICE OF LEATHER. Butte, SO to 561bs each 221 to 23d per lh Ditto, 56 to 661bs each ........ ............ 24d to 26d Dressing Hides led to 204 Fine Coach Hides 20d to 211 Crop Hides, 35 to 401bs for cutting i9d to 20d Ditto 45 to 501 b» 201 to 21 Calf Skini, 36. t o 401b s ...... ... ........ 2od to 26d Ditto 50 to 70Ibs 26d to 29d Ditto 70 to 801bs 24d to 25a Small Seals (Greenland) . lBd to 18 . Large ditto l6d to ied Tanned Horse Hides l6l to 181 Spanish Horse Hides... .... . ...... ...... - 161 to 21d hAW HIDES. • Beat Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary... 2s 6d to Ss Si stone) 3: 4d to 5: 6d Market Calf Se Od to 05 Cld Middlings 35 Od to 35 2d Eng. Hone Os Od tO 05 ii COAL MARKET, JULY 25. Newcastle 365. Od. to 435. 6d.—Sunderland 365. Od. to 435. a COUNTRY MARKETS. Osman, Jura. 19.—Wheat 7s. 4jd. a bushel. The price of a half-peck loaf (household) U. sd. Uxisainor, Jute 24.—New 'Wheat perload, £0 Os tostoa. Wheat, £l3 Os to £lB Os—Barley per qr. 345. to 3/x-00 27. to 33s—Beans, 35s to 388.-..iPeas, .37s to 40s. COURSE OF EXC Amsterdam l2 10 C.F. Ditto at sight 12 8 Rotterdam... l2 11 Antwerp,ex-mo 12 9 Hamhurgh... 3B 2 Altuna 3B 3 Paris, 3day's sight 25 80 Ditto 26 5 Madrid, effective 36i Cad 4 effect 35 Barcelona ...... 35 nilbonolketive 38} RANGE, JULY 24. &Wilk 55 3O Leghorn 46* Genoa 43 Venice ItaL Lla M 1. Malta 41 ' Naples Palermo ........117 pet Lisbon 5! Rio Janeiro SO ' Dublin Oat. 2ith, SJAIUSIEL, CUCCTIV C .0 1 Lulea ....... .... .. WI : vet !stk. PRICES OF GOLD ANDiIILVER. ' ' - 'ere Pi fc Foreign Goldin Bars • • • • • 517 -IF • P 1 5 a A New Doubloons i ''' ...i.. a .... ...... 5 N. - e , New Dollars ...................:.... a 0 4 we. di Ted, Sitver, in bars, standard 0 0 ) tio ' OTT, id A 1 L&—THIS DAY. ' 4 t Alt. MIL Mili• Ogg . 1 the, Dublin 1 0 Fr ance 1 0 ..,r 13In-' Waterford 1 0 }i m b u e & 1 0 • • s' 4 oti 'Guernsey and Jersey . 7 0 • 0' Flanders 0 • ra ;- o x i, Lisbon 0 0 Malta 0 0 0/ ...., . • 'Halland 1 0 Gottenbursh 1 9 • ..1' lu. America 0 •1 1 Jamaica 0 . . 0 - t —.-------'-' se ... L.. .1 1316H-WATSItat LONDON BRIDGIC To.mos • 1: , raw - AL.rueis . - - . . _le minutes after it. .1„ per. _ Afternoon . * . •. $4 minutes after II .—.... t he . i ':---''', - . LONDON: . Printaid and iniblidied by Lam Rzor,fkist, Place, temple-Bar. 0 . , ... ._ - • _ s=.: