Star. — London, England, 1821-12-25 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. POLICE. • Outunutz.--In the course of a cause (ShieUs and Co. v. Rus sell) which came on for hearing in the Court of Common Pleas `eat Guildhall, on Saturday, before Chief Justice DALLAS, the re port of which we inserted in our Paper of yesterday, two wit nesses, named Pairster and Jahn Nightingale, examined on the part of the plaintiffs, were directed by the Judge to be prosecuted for perjury, and in consequence taken immediately into custody. The mere direction of the Judge that these witnesses should be prosecuted, would not, it seems, necessarily have implied that they should have been taken into custody; the commitment, therefore, if any ccimmitrnertt was ordered, would have been for contempt of Court, in which case they should have been taken into custody by the officer of the Court, viz. the Warden of the Fleet. By some mistake Drinkwater, one of the City officers in attendance, took charge of them, lodged them in Giltspur street Compter, and in this way they were brought up yesterday for examination, among the rest of the prisoners, before the sitting Magistrate, Mr. Alderman-lhaen- Mr. Huisritaxes, who attended as Solicitor for the prisoners, Inquired upon what charge, and upon what authority they were in custody? when it appeared that no formal commitment of any kind had been made out. The only warrant Mr. Teague, the Keeper of the Compter, Could produce for holding them being the certificates signed by Mr. Cox, the associate, that the Chief Justice had directed that they should be prosecuted for 'perjury, and assigned Joseph Green Walford, Esq. as Counsel for Mr. Russell, the defendant :in the cause, who, by his At. twiny, had undertaken to carry on the prosecution against them. Under these circumstances, their Solicitor contended they were in custody illegally, and upon no proper authority ; and inti mated that they might have their action for false imprisonment. The Solicitor for the prosecution intimated that a charge of fe- Ion) , might be preferred against them ; but the parties were not present, not did he know that they would be willing to prosecute. On the other hand, the prisoners' Solicitor was willing that they should give bail for their appearance to plead to, and an swer any indictment that might be preferred against them ; but their bail was not in attendance, and if they had been, the Soli citor for the prosecution would not consent to accept them with out time being allowed for inquiry into their responsibility. The City Solicitor was called in, but no other alternative pre sented itself, except that the prisoners should consent to remain in custody till bail was procured and accepted; and accordingly they were at their own request remanded until Thursday next. llow-STREET.—Thterday, a young man, calling himself &aril Teeke, was charged under the sed George 111. cap. 135, with " unlawfully, maliciously, and contemptuously" disturbing the congregation at the Great Queen-street Chapel, during the time Of Divine Service on Sunday evening. Elizabeth Dyer, a pew-opener at the Chapel, stated that the -defendant and several other young men had for a long time past been in the habit of coming on a Sunday evening, for no other purpose than to " ogle the girls," and I argil and talk during the time the Service was going on. Several of the other sex, too, she was sorry to say, behaved with equal indecorum, and :be Chapel was matte rather a place forifieestien and love-making, than for Divine Winship. On Sunday evening lest she saw the defendant And another mm "ogling" as usual, and when they were applied to upon the subject, one of them burst into a " horse-laugh." Mr. Mynah, a reepectable inhabitant of the parish, serving the office of constable, stated that he had repeatedly seen the defendant conducting himself in the most indecorous !limner in the Chapel, and he had him in custody for that offence in January, 1820, when he was suffered to go at large, upon a re presentation that he was just going to a situation in the country. (hi Sunday evening he resisted being taken into custody, and • made so much noise that a crowd of at least 100 persons col lected about the doors; the congreg ation were much alarmed, and the Minister was stopped in his discourse. • The defendant bad nothing to say. Sir ItienAßD Boom said, that perhaps the defendant was not - aware of the provisions of the Act of Parliament upon which he was brought here, although be must be et-noxious that he was behaving extremely wrong, and he would therefore read one of the clauses, for d 4 information of him and others of the same • class. The worthy Magistrate then read the clause, whfeh sets forth that any person " unlawfully, &c. disturbing a religious conga nation, shell be required to give two sureties of £5O each for his appearance at the Sessions, and there, upon conviction, be fined is the sum of £40." Ile (Sir Iliciteer BlitN11:';t therefore called upon the defendant to give these sureties. The defendant was nut prepared, sad was committed until he found bail to that amount. Maneeintoron-sraeer.---Seven gentlemanly-dressed young blades, wim had made copious offerie:?s at the shrine of Ilse iglus, on Sunday night, were charged with kickim: up a row, in the vicinity of Bedford-square, flooring watchmen, blacking eyes, smashing lanterns, &c. It was nearly a fec-s;mile of the row scene in the representation of Tee - and .1.r,, at the Miectr Theatres, and the assailants seem: el to have aped the dresses worn in the theatrical representation. A young Lawyer was the CoresaMaa in perfection, a Merchant's Clerk chewed off Jerry, and a neater .Logic cannot be found.--The witnesses in support of the charge were four watchmen, one of whom (I teeth) had his head tied up. The lira attack was made on ilogatt, who de sired them to go on, when they knocked hint down, and, to use his own words, took away ev,:sy morsel of kis senses. Ile sprung his rattle when on the ground, god Ikathoame, and his tale was, that he was knocked down by Jerry. Heath went on to state, that one called out to the other, " Go it, Toni ; where's Logic?" when a voice replied, that" he was at work." Heath was again knocked down, when Sullivan came up, anal the assailants had a turn at him and floored him. *Here there was a general testae between the watchmen and the accused, and they were all taken to the watch•house. Jerry, Tom, Logic, and another, were or tiered to lied bail. Quereevaue ax.—The three men charged with stealing various ornaments belonging to a tomb in Edward the Confessor's Cha pel, in Westminster Abbey, were ageitt examiced yesterday. Air. GLANVILLS attended on the part of the prosecution, and stated to the s!agictratc, that in coneequetice of the previous good character of the accused, the Dean and Chapter declined to prosecute the case further.—Mr. lielesronn then addressed the prisoners, who are all young men under ZIO years of age, and hoped the lenity shewn them would have a proper effect on their mind; ; it was very humane, on the part of the Dean and Chap ter to decline prosecuting. The prisoners were discharged. Ilarrow-Gaemar.—.inaiJoeia,..i, who had been remanded on a former occasion, was yesterday put to the bar, charged with passing counterfeit sovereigns.—Mr. Powell, the solicitor to the .alint, attended for the prosecution, and she was fully committed. POACHERS.—We have already stated that on Sun day night, the 9th instant, between twelve and one o'clock, Henry Judd, gamekeeper to Thomas ASIIE SON SMITH, Esq. accompanied by six assistants, were attacked in Ashdown Coppice, at Ted worth, in Ham p sl.ire, by a desperate gang of poodle's, consisting of five or six men, armed with guns and other weapons., one of whom shot at and killed Robert Baker, one of the assistant gamekeepers.—Mr. ASHETON SNIIIII made every possible exertion to pursue the murderers, but not being able to trace them in the country, he sent an express to Sir Ric nAlty Bi [tyre, at the Police office, Bow-street, fur the assistance of an active and itifelligent officer. Taunton was dispatched, who has at length succeeded in apprehending two of the gang, , who prove to be Edmund Steele and James Turner, two well-known men as labourers in that part of the country. They have undergone several examinations' belthe the Magistrates at Andover, and were finally committed last Wednesday to Winchester prison, on a charge of the wilful murder of Robert Baker. The prisoner Steele has turned King's evidence, and, from his confession, it appears that the gang of poachers consisted of five. The other three not in custody, were all labourers, who worked in and about Andover. As two of the gamekeepers of Capt. Ittcay were on duty, a few nights back, in the preserves around Mistley Hall, Essex, they were attacked by five men armed with air-guns : one of the gamekeepers, an el derly man, received a violent blow on the he ad, and was threatened with death, but his companion, at the moment, aimed a blow at the man which struck his wrist and disarmed him • two of the kaows are Woo yid cola:lined for the &Lank. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DECEMBER 22. ALLARDTCR v. JOHNSON. This was an action against the defendant for cri minal conversation with the plaintiff's wife. The cause having been entered for trial at the present sit tings, and there being still,a large arrear of remanets from the last sittings, and no prospect of its coming on for trial Until the sittings after next Term, Mr. Castrzict, now moved, on behalf of the plain tiff, to hasten on the trial, by taking it out of its turn • and fixing it specially for some day after the holidays. The CHIEF JUSTICE immediately interposed, and asked how he could do so much injustice to the other suitors of the Court, as to take this cause out of its tern? ' Mr. CAMPBELL said he was aware this was an un- Usual application, and that very special grounds ought to be laid before the Court to induce it to yield to the motion. This, however, was such a case as required the indulgence of the Court ; and the appli cation would not have been made unless there was a reasonable hope that it would be yielded to. Ile should premise what he had to state by observing that there would be no opposition to it from the other side, as he understood Mr. Puller had been instructed to consent on behalf of the defendant. It was an action brought against a Captain in the East India • Company's service, for criminal conversation with the plaintiff's wife. The plaintiff was a Surgeon in the 34th Regiment of the East India Company's troops, and was now in England on leave of absence. The criminality between the Lady and the defendant was alleged to have taken place on board ship, during a voyage from India. All the plaintiff's witnesses were now in London ; the plaintiff himself was also in London, and his leave of absence was limited to a certain time. His object was to obtain a bill of di vorce next Session of Parliament, and if the trial was not brought on at an early period, he would be de tained in England at least a whole year, to his great inconvenience, and injury to his professional views. The affidavit upon which the motion was made fur ther stated, that many of the witnesses necessary to support the action were about to return back to India, and that, if the trial did not take place at the•ad journed sittings after the holidays, he would lose the benefit of their testimony, both on the trial and in support of the divorce bill in the House of Lords.— Under these circumstances it was hoped that the Court would be pleased to fix a day to have the cause brought on. The (7nter ..111sTicE said, that certainly the circum stances stated took the case out of the general tole. They were very peculiar, ani therefore the cause might be fixed for an early day after the holidays. GODFREY V. BRIANT. This was an action brought by the plaintiff to re cover compensation in damages for injury sustained by his chaise and cart, owing to the negligence of defendapes servant, who was driving a team of horses in October, 1820. Mr. SCA RLETT stated the case as, one which would be easily proved; but;unfortunately,')ike many others, it skewed how the powerful often oppressed the weak. The plaintiff had a cart and horse standing at his door loaded with dung ; and, as the Jury woul.l easily believe, not very proud of his burthen, or of the abject state to which he w as reduced. Not so, however, the well-fed team and horses of the rich wh:u finger. — They cape: e.i along without a driver, and as spi ightly as if they knew their superiority, ran against the little horse and cart, upset the cart, and drove one of the shafts into the horse's neck. Ile knew not what defence would be made to this, except that the cart and :mite had no right to stand where they did. Be that, however, as it might, the wharfinger's horses had no light tq run down the poor little animal ; they should have asked him to get out of the way a . .., least; but, as the driver was in a neighbouring pub = lic-hnise, they Itisked about as they thought proper, and committed the injury for which lie now sought a fair and equitable compensation. Two witnesses proved the injury to have occurred as stated by the Learned Counsel, and the attorney's clerk the service of the writ on Mr. John Briant, who said lie was the prop ietor of the waggon: The farrier wlm attended the hot se, proved that he was reduced in value full £5; and the plaintiff's son, that he was obliged to hire another cart and horse fur nearly five weeks. Mr. GURNEY, for the defendant said, the question here was, was not the wrong defendant sued ? if a fair compensation would have been accepted it would not have come into Court. He called the carter who drove the waggon on the day in question, but, on being pressed in his cross examination, could not say whether the son was not in partnership with the father. Verdict for plaintiff—Damages, £lO ; costs, 40s. WALTER V. SNIITIT. This was an action brought by the plaintiff to re cover the amount of a gold watch and chain which he had pledged at the shop of the defendant, a pawn broker at Cheltenham. Mr. NIA IVIYATT said the plain fact in this case wss, that the plaintiff, being in want"of a little money at Cheltenham, pawned his gold watch for £2. 2s. in January, 1820. Some months after, he wrote to the defendant to keep his watch for a few days longer, as the period of its forfeiture had arrived. The de fendant refused acceding to this request, and either sold the watch at an wider price, or kept it, and dis posed of it as he thought proper. The Learned Coun sel said, although he did not deny the right of sale in the pawnbroker, yet that such sale should be pub licly advertised, in order that the parties interested might know how to act, and either buy the articles, or receive whatever surplus it might bring, deducting the amount for which it was pledged. In this case, the pawnbroker had the watch undisposed of after the legal period of sale had arrived ; and the case being so, he contended,when the amount of the pawn and the interest was tendered to him, he was bound to give it up. Mr. Billings proved that he called on the pawn broker, who admitted in . August last that the watch in question then remained unsold. Mr. GURNEY, for the defendant, contended that when the period of forfeiture had arrived, it was in the power Of the pawnbroker to make a sale. The LORD CHIES JUSTICE.—II this case be decided in your favour, according to what I see of the Act, it is high time that a new provision should be made as to patties pledging, But that will not now alter the law. According to 111! present opinion, though forfeiture may take place at the end of a year and a day, yet not taking place, as was proved in thit case, I consider the plaintiff as entitled to a verdict. Verdict fot the plaintiff—Damages £lO, subject to a special case, if it should be hereafter aecessary. The Court adjourned until the 2d of January, 1822. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DECEMBER 22. COLLINS R. PICKFORD. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN stated, that this was an action brought by a seaman, lately belonging to the Resource British merchant-vessel, of which the de fendant was master, to recover the sum of £37 odd, under the following circumstances :—Application was made to the crew of the Resource, by a South American man of war, called the Eagle, in the Pa triot service, to volunteer their services to attack a Spanish brig in the South Aw.efican seas, promising that if they succeeded they should have prize-money. The plaintiff and eleven of his companions, with the defendant's permission, accordingly armed themselves with boarding-hooks, and took possession of this Spa nish prize with great gallantry. The prize-money being . afterwards made payable at Valparaiso, the Captain said to the seamen, " You had better put the money into my hands," and they assented to that proposal. He should call witnesses, who would prove that the Captain received the money; but, shameful as it appeared, he now resisted•the plaintiff's claim, under pretence that he had left his ship, on account of which he had marked R. against his name in the ship's books. Now, however this circumstance of the plaintiff's running away from the ship might vi tiate his claim to wages, which the Learned Serjeant did not mean here to deny, still this could have no , application to a claim of prize-money, which was the reward of the plaintiff's gallantly in the service he had performed, and for which the money had been received by the defendant. W. Nimpky deposed, that the plaintiff, himself, and nine others, the crew of the Resource, volunteered their services, as above stated, and having succeeded in the enterprize, the Commander of the Spanish Pa triot man of war, in consequence of their having made a prize of the Spanish brig and brought her safe into the port of Valparaiso, gave each of them prize -tickets. Witness means, that Captain Pickford got the tickets tar them from the Officer of the Pa triot man of war. Captain Pickford did not tell his men how much they were entitled to; but he took them on shore with him to the house of a merchant, at Valparaiso; to whom they agreed to sell their prize-money for £37. 3s. 9d. although witness was afterwards informed it amounted to £3OO each, which the defendant received for them, and took on board his ship, giving the men bills, or promissory notes, on the house of Macdonald and Bushel, of London, for the £37. is. 9d. per man. The plaintiff had lost these bills Mr. Scrjeant TADDY submitted, that the plaintiff was not entitled to recover against the Captain, since it appeared, by the statement of this witness, that the money was paid to the merchant at Valparaiso, who gave bills i;; ex,hange for it. Witness, in cross•elaniination, admitted he had re ceived payment of the bills uhich he and others had received, and which were paid by Macdonald and Co. immediately on presentation. • Under these circumstances, the Learned Serjeant submitted, that the plaintiff having failed to present those bills on Macdonald and Co. fur payment, could not maintain this action. Mr. Serjeant VAUGHAN submitted, in reply, that as the bills had beer lost by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff's claim never having been in any manner sati fled, unless the Captain could spew the bills given to tl:e plaintiff had been satisfied, he was liable to pay him nut of the money received by him, the Captain, that being " money had and received for the plaintiff's use." 'the witness proceeded to state, that several of his fellow-sailors lost tlieir bills. Witness lost one of his; the• other was received by witness's wife from Mac donald and Co. Witness did not know that the plain tiff left the ship of his own accord, but that he was turned out of her by the Captain. Mr. Serjeant N submitted these bills never had, and in all probability never would, appear against the Captain ; and in that case it was hard upon the plaintiff that the Captain should keep his money. He should call another witness to prove the Captain received the money. Paterson deposed, that he was a seaman on board the Resource. Knew that the plaintiff and. others volunteered their services, and succeeded in' carrying the Spanish vessel as a prize into Valparaiso. Ile had reason to believe Captain Pickford, the de tendaut, received the money ; witness saw the bags which contained it brought on board the Resource, and also one of the men (who did not send it home), paid his•prize-money out of the bag by the defendant. Believes Collins has not received his money, having lost his bills. Mr. Serjeant TADDY, for the defendant, observed, however the Jury might think this case insufficiently proved . by the testimony of these witnesses, who gave such a confused account of the business, t he charac ter of the Captain, more than the sum sought to be recovered, was at stake, although, in fact, he had not received the money ; but, as appeared by the evi dence of Nimpky, these men went to the house of Field, Brandon, and Co. of Valparaiso, to sell their claims ; and that these merchants gave them bills on the house of M'Donald and Co. payable in London. Then this plaintiff having last his bills, until he makes an affidavit of that fact, or procures substituted bills from the merchants at Valparaiso, the plaintiff's claim could not be paid by the agents here. It was evident that the money must have been paid to the merchants there, from whom these bills were received, and not to the Captain. The Learned Serjeant said, he sincerely hoped the plaintiff would not ultimately .lose his claim; but, in the meantime, having lost his bills, he had lost his remedy in this action. The CHIRP JUSTICE observed, what demand could the plaintiff have on the Captain, on account of these bills having been lost? Mr. Serj eant VAUGHAN .— I submit, my Lord, that as the plaintiff has lost these bills, and. they. have sever been presented, unless the contrary can be shewn, and it is competent for the Captain to prove otherwisecccalled a CHIRP etudu rpio) b ajnv y t son t the glce payreceived t evidencelo v thinker o thet o f M t lin money,oDp;.aaltnydd:esna.ntlthiiadaebrteToiroetil:be.el :boll direct a uoutuit.—Plaiutiff Nousuited. " _ -•• • COVEIVCOMMON PLEAS,DCBLIN, Dec. 22. RERAN V. PAKENHAIL This was an action brought by the 11 tintiE, H ug h Keran, against Edward Pakeaham, El. the 1 3 : o High Sheriff of the County of Donegal, for a Use return on a writ of Capias ad Respondcridum, a the plaintiff's suit, against .Nlr. Knox Montgomery, Lea. tenant in the 81st Regiment, marked for : Oa s s. 2IL which, after a patient hearing before Lord Noma ! and a respectable Jury, for two days, ended with a verdict for the plaintiff, for the amot tt uf the wiit and sixpence costs, which gave much satisiltction to a crowded Court. It was through the neglect of Alr. Edward Crawford, the Sub-Sheriff, that the writ r: s not served on Mr. Montgomery ; but it was against the High Sheriff of the County that the action w as brought, as the law held him responsible for the neglect of the under Officer. Piaintiff was twenty. one years in the set vice of the British army, a c A , lour-Serjeant, and having , Pay-Serjeant of tie com pany, advanced money tor the Officer's account who commanded the said company, and the suE6stenc e and necessaries for the use of the men, the sum ma at the font of the said writ, which occulted durinv the campaigns of the Duke of Wellington in Spaia, and, from the rapid movements of the at my tu which the plaintiff's regiment belonged, he could ro t get payment of the same from the said Officer ; And a r ta the return of the plaintiff's regiment from the sp a . nish, American, and Ft ench camp aigas,in which they were particularly engaged, he obtained hi. discharge, with the highest pension that a soldier of his rank was entitled to ; after which, it appe.:ied he made re peated applications to the Officer, and at length to the Commanding Officer of his Reginreat, wha formed him that he could then give no military'-:e. dress, but to seek his remedy by common law, Ira:. much as the plaintiff was then discharged 11 . 0.:1 t ie army, but permitted him to take copies of the ie . counts from the companY's books. From the novelty of this case in a Court of Common Law, much difs. culty arose in explaining the accounts,. and to satiq the Court and Jury ; but in which, by the close at:e::. tion of the plaintiff's Counsel till' h o ot th e „I,,i e hearing of the cause, the plaintiff succeeded. Thursday evening. between five and six o'clock, as Miss &ant was proceeding along ItxcliXe-highitar, to her-residence in Pell street, a villain snatched a parcel from her containing -cloth for a pelisse, and running up a narrow passage, followed by three of his associates, got clear ff. Yesterday morning the body of a co , pulent was found at Duke's Shore, Limejtouse, which ap. peared to have been a considerable time in the water. CORONER'S INQUEST.—Yesterday evening an I G . quisition was taken at the Old Rose. Itatcliff-highwa-, before J. W. UNWIN, Esq. Coroner, on the body Oi Jane Parkins. The deceased was an elderly woman, and kept }muse for Mr. Thomas Young, in Moreton's. court, Ratcliff-highway. On Sunday night, bei.,ea ten and eleven o'clock, she came home in a st..:e of intoxication, and all entreaties used to prevail on ha to go to bed were fruitless; on the family retinne is rest, she was left in her room on the ground•fh;cr by herself, and nothing seen of her until yesterda morning, about seven o'clock, when the war found lying on the floor on her face, quite dead, uith h cr clothes on. Her right cheek was eaten tA by the rats, as also the flesh of her right arm, and two of her fingers were gnawed by the ianie vermin. ter. diet—" Died from excessive chinking." NEWGATKAsoLr.ADENI (By the. Beef es od to 51 41 Mutton. ...... 2s 01 to Zs od I(ALL AIMIKETS,Dt4 Carcase.) I Veal 3i 01 to is Si I Pork Ss 041 to 4s 41 vi 7 PRICES or HAY AND STRAW IF.STEItDAL JAIIFS ' S. • itrutilArn. Hay 31 Ss od to 41 4s Od 11ay... 31 lOs to 41 Os II Straw 1 4s Od to 11 lls lid Straw 11 10, to 1116.01 Clover 3112 s Od to 41 lOs od Clover 41 Os to 41 0101 PRICE OF HOPS. tires VACS. '"poems. Kent Sussex 2l Os to 31 Os Sussex ...... 21 44 to 31 s Essex Foreign ... 01 Os to 01 Os Farnham 7% os solo% ss PRICE or TALLOW, Town Tailors 47s Od Yellow Russia sos Od White ditto —s Od Soap ditto SOAP, &c. per 11f3b ' INtto rough Yellow Soap co Mottled . ' Su Curd ... Mating Stuff 39s Ott — PRICE OFCANDLES-1 Candles, per doz. 9s 6d—i% allowed for IPalm ... Prom Tallow Chandlers 1141. loulds, 11s 01; 61. per dous ready money. PRICE OF LEATHER. %Ur, 50 to 561bs each old to 22A put Ditto, 56 to 6lbs each 22d to 24d Dressing Hides 17d to 191 Fine Coach Hides 18/ to 21d Crop Hides, 35 to 40Ibs for cutting 171 to 18/ Ditto 45 to 50114 181 to 211 Calf Skins, ;A) to 401bs ' 'id to 50d Ditto 50 to 701bs old to 7,5 d Ditto 70 to 8011)4 26d to 291 Small Seals (Greenland) 18d to 20d Large ditto 15d to 184 Tooled Horse Tildes 164 to 181 Spool:.It Horse Hides 194 to std RAW 111 DES. Best Heifers and Steers (per I Ordinary... 2s Ad to N ISI stone) 3s 4d to 33 64 Market Calf 94 od to os Aliddlings ss Od to 5,2 d Eng. Horse Os od to Os 1 0 Sheepskins. ss. 6d. to 4.. Od.—Downs, 2s. 10d. to 33 ol COAL MARKET, Dsc. 24. Ships at Market. Ships Sold. .44 Newcastle 21 gmlelarlsnA Price. .6 1 .t. MARRIED. On Tuesday, the 18th, at St. George's Church, DuMiq I! the Hon. and Rev. Henry Pakenham, the Rev. R p 1 Foster, of Colon, nephew of Lord Oriel, to Catherine, set', John Hamilton, Esq. of Brown Hall, and niece of die DO Longford. Dec.l3, at Shrewsbury, Capt. James Arthur Murray, 0. Hamlet, youngest daughter of the late Win. Richardl o o 4 of Keithlock. . Lately, at Renwick, near Penrith, Mr. John Hood, bl .l , known by the name of Admiral Hood, aged 84 ran, t° Hilton, aged 18 years. after a courtship of seven days DIED. Dec.l4, at Penritb, Richard Story, M.D. aged 83. A few days ago, at an advanced age, Diary' P 3 1,„ Keighley. This remarkable woman, for upwards of 3 0 7, has supported herself and husband in excessive rioting sod ing, with money obtained from the ignorant and credulm u l . telling their fortunes. 1116 IiNFATfiLIt at LON DOIIIIRIDGN - 21 agnates altar Afternoon - LONDO:1; Printed and published by Lavin Egsh place, Tempt-l3ar. - :: - t '1 Mm ,_,. • . § ..... NI 11... ...... 'TV .4n t -V/ tea oiliko. r '~a Cr W M 1 11 t