Star. — London, England, 1823-03-25 00:00:00

?: a :dj - )rt,!);,!;t Lie I he swr id, the is posed aid, but t tL the ged the Tnrnent rout the te ly kept ge state- de upon ent 1 in po Intititied were .11 u a ruled say .that tey were propar men Ca , Enittre and 5.. 14 0 sere was herefore, sposition islanders Ilut.the rad been the corn. hat they :al force. Its of the ft wits in lad been hich the ucceeded lisgusted ut, as to , and in lossessed. the pos noney to tors thus this not !phalonis oted ; in '73 voted d in the Now he I be any d in the they et ruber had atever in ijoy these goodness Fact, that astanding , had et; last ye:tr. lend, jas ,verntuent than the/ regard ta ber spolt4 that the e Petition recalltit s moment only used .1 his exec• . In fact, found is ich he go- rdeen us% meet hits y to grant ere neccv ). Ile Gentle li s otdies -eserve the less thsi inds di4,tra i that Sir :d to make ids, %der e by ever/ wining tee r fr om emao, : es again' : , would n 3 it fair Ind " Or ible Offic'' clf, ands' extreme!, ariog tee' , 1) (fir. Pc d rionoura c )y ; and: , nev er saw any man more actuated by a greater de . ;re of honouring and raising the Britisli name— Weer, hear).—He was • not surprised when his Ho nourable Friend had found the charges lately pre ferred against one Governor of the name of Maitland to be unfounded , that he should anticipate a similar result to those made against another. Lord A. HAMILTON said, the charges made w ere more against Ministers : than against Sir T. Mait land. He wished to know whether Sir T. Maitland was to he approved of by Government or not, espe cially in the case of Mr. 'Martinengo, who was sen . tented to ten years imprisonment, for something, but he defied the united talents of the Treasury Bench to say what the charge against that unfortunate person was? The President of the Board of Controul should leave off his levity, and either defend or deny the rntence on Mr. Martinengo. %While such an atro cious sentence remained on record, and was remitted ;by the Government, because no one could tell what The charge was, it was impossible not to believe that the conduct of Sir Thomas Maitland was approved Sy Government. Mr. PEEL replied. He reprobated the mode of Lsing personalities, such as calling an Officer a scourge and a tyrant. Mr. IVYNN thought it most unfair, on a vote of this kind, to bring charges against All lion. Oflicer, which could not be settled on this question. Let a specific motion be made, and then it could be fairly met. It was ridiculous to say that calling a gallant Officer a scourge and a tyrant was'only a charge against the Government. Let the Hon. Member bring forward his charges against Sir Thomas Mait land, and then they would consider what scut of an swer was to be made to them. Colonel DAVIES thought it unfair to attack his Hon. Friend on what he had said some evenings be fore. It was quite unfounded to say that his lion. Friend had made vague charges, for he had made them distinct and specific. Mr. WILMOT explained. He was ready to sup ply the House t.ith every information on this sub ject, and to show the fallacy, he had almost said the zAsehood, of these charges. The Resolution was then agreed to. Upon till grant of three thousand pounds for the National Vaccine Establishment, Mr. HUME said, the advice of the *Secretary of State for the Home Department was the very last that he would take, and therefore he told him this once for all, to save him from trouble in future. His charges against Sir Thomas Maitland had been openly made in that House, and he had substantiated by authentic documents, proofs of his tyrannical con duct. As the Government had mitigated the punish ment of Martinengo, it was evident that they con sidered it unjust and improper. _ _ _ Mr. DA‘C'SON defen - deci the vote for the National Vaccine Est4blisliment, as being one which concerned the welfare cf the v;hole world. In Ceylon above sax° persons had been vaccinated in the last year, 4 20,000 at and 24.,C00 at •llombay. The `Board had the most extensive correspondence with all parts of the world. Mr. WILMOT denied that any policy, different from what had been first adopted, had been used to wards the people of the lonian Islands. Sir I. COFFIN thought it hard on .m Officer, em ployed on foreign service, to be called a scourge aad a tyrant. Mr. HUME said the documents which he had brought before the House fully bore him out in the words which he had used.—The Resolution was agreed to. 111r..IIUME wished to know whether measures were taken by Government to ascertain whether 'fo reign 'Officers, on our half-pay, did or did not serve in other armies? Sir U. BURGH said, they were obliged to certify that they received no pay in other services, before they could receive half-pay ft am this conntty. The rest of the Resolutions were agreed to. BEER DUTIES BILL. Upon the motion of the CHAwcoLtou of the.r tautten, Mr. BROGEWN brought up the Report of, the Beer Duties Mr. 1-10LME SUMNER. said, that evasion might arise out of the Bill, as it gave the power to sell beer' ' -which might be sold in one house, and drank by per sons assembled for that purpoSe in the next. The CHANCELLOR of the t reffi3QUER said, be believed there was a clause to prevent that. Mr. HUSKISSON said, that a precaution might be taken to guard against the-case mentioned by the Monourable Member. hir. Alderman WOOD contended, that the mea sure Was a tax upon the people. Kir. Alderman TI-10M-PSON approved of the as he thought it would enable the poorer classes toiget malt liquor cheaper than they could at present. Mr. BENNET said this would be very small beer Weed ; and the way in which it was to be brewed would hold out strong inducements to use drugs in ' tie brewing. The better way would be to take off the dirty en beer altogether. lie wished also that leer should be made a shop article altogether, to pre- N:.it the labourer from going to public-houses. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER did not bring this forward as a measure perfectly free from fault; but he thought they were bound to give it a fair trial. • Mr. GRATTAN wished that this measure should beextendetl to Ireland. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER said, time %ras tte becr duty in Ireland. Sir J. BOUGH:EY supported the measure. Mr. F. LLINIS red tilt present monopoly in tl!e manufacture of Wet.. 'Mr. F. BUXTON said, the principle of this Mesa.- slre was to injure the large brewers, whb had great clpitals enthisked in trade, by inamosiog a higher salt of duties on them than 011 those who should brew obis beet-z -The Rerkrt was agreed to, emi a Bill twk dered tot,* ttromght meautArT SEATIEN APPRENTIbta. tie Report of the Ships Apprentices Bill *A Bheel! 10. Mr. RICARDO denied that this Bill would et all 4 ereatt the number of seamen ; but if k be thuald s.ly it WAS unfair to make persons take apprentices, when so many able seamen were out of employ Meat. I t ie Proposed an amendment, " that all the words repodrshould be left out of the clause," iris l i c. et' being tb remove that .compulsory coneitioW for la . ng 4 certain 'number of sipprenticei from the Bill. . 54 . 11 U:3M5:30N said, the Honourable Grentlernau • wag not to be told of the general poliefof this coun try. in relation to maritime strength and maritime affairs, and with what vigilance It sought for. the means of encouraging and propagating skill in sea manship. In applying the general rule of the irn policy of interference, it was always necessary to dis tinguish those cases from the reit in which the mari time strength and force of the country were involved. What were all our navigation laws and registry. acts but so many modifications of this policy, in which interference must be exercised in order to preserve it? Ilk could be shewn, indeed, that the Bill would have no other effect than that of impeding the growth of commercial wealth, the grounds would be unsound. But it was a condition common to other ships, as well as those in the West India trade, to be compel led to take a certain number of apprentices. There were two classes of apprentices engaged. The first was a compulsory class of parish apprentices, who were put upon the Masters of ships by the parish offi cers, and the Masters were obliged to take them.— (i•lr. Hume dissented).—llid the Hon. - Gentleman deny that? He could assure him he was entirely mistaken as to the fact. It was no more optional 'with the Master of a vessel to refuse or take parish ,apprentices, than with tradesmen and householders. But there was anther class of apprentices, who went to sea voluntarily, to accomplish themselves in the profession of seamanship. As the law at present stood, there was no security to them from being pressed into the naval service, after the age of 18 ;—. the Bill protected them to the age of 21, and this had been considered as highly desirable by the ship owners and merchants. Mr. SYKES wished the Bill not to be hurried through the House. He had hoped that all new re straints upon commerce were at an end. Sir G. COCKBURN understood that the shipping interest was very well pleased with this Bill. Mr. MARRYAT said, he had been a ship owner for .1.0 years, and had taken great pains to bring up his apprentices, and to educate them,properly ; and he had always made it a rule never to make any one an officer in his ships, unless he had served his time with him. The Hon. Gentleman (Ricardo) was l against thii measure as being one of compulsion ; but ; they would never break a• horse, or send a boy to school, on the same principle—because that was com pulsion. He had heard that Bonaparte had said of political' economists, that if he had a throne of ada mant they would grind it to powder ; and so would the political economists of that House wind naval power to powder. Mr.BERNAL spoke in favour of the Bill. Mr. GLADSTONE believed this Bill had received• the general approbation of the country. Sir I. COFFIN thought this Bill gave thebest pro tection to the merchant-vessels, by affording, three years more protection to the seamen. Mr. BRIGHT agreed in the excellence of thTißill. Mr. HUME said, the object of the Bill seemed to be to employ apprentices instead of able seamen; and he hoped his Hon. Friend would divide the House. The House divided— For the Amendment - Against it - 6 - .8S • WA R EIIOUBING BILL. On the motion of Mr. WALLACE, the 'Report of this Bill was brought up, and the. House went into a Com mittee on.the recommittal of it. Mr. R ATT.itLN obseried, that that pan of the Bill which related to the Linen Trade would be ill viewed in Ireland. Mr. WALLACE said, that this was a Most im portant branch of trade, and one which he looked . forward with anxiety to see fully brought under the' consideration of the House. He thought those who advocated the transit duty which had been placed on Irish linen, were bound to •skew 'the propriety of placing such a duty, in his opinion, contrary to the general principles on which 'such things were deter mined in general. Sir G. HILL thought it exceedingly onTair to the., linen trade Of Ireland, that in the Bill of last year ) they should be exempted, and this year 'vain cluded, without any sort of notice to the persons in- i terested in it. WALLACE appreheUded, thatthere would be ample time to collect alit:he : Members connected with the part Of the kingdom t'onterned in this trade, be tween 'this and the "Ma of April, when he proposed the tLiril reading - should take place. Mr.Bt2tlNG. RIM thought this was a subject de manding tote treated with -reference to the tranquil lity of Ire/and. Itlr.Secretary PM reminded the House that this question was one which ought to be viewed in a dif ferent light from any other quettiOn its the Bill, arid was to be determined upon particular met% of its own ; and be begged leave to give notice, Halt the discussion of the Bill, on the 21st April, he should, endeavour to press this view on the House. After a few words from Colonel BARRY and Mr. Bzumer, IVlr. WALLACE introduced a clause into the Bill to provide against foreign watches being warehoused' under the provisions of the Bill, with the fraudulent, English mask upon them. He observed that the watchmakers had told him that they did not fear the competition of the French watches in the open mar ket; but this practice was detrimental to theft *ade and reputation. He also proposed a chute to pit.' vent any wine being bottled in the docks of this Coif-- .try in any bottles but those of the coanrry. The Right llon. Gentleman also stated, that the 'Chancellor eff the Exchequer had agreed to withdraw a ceitstik tirawbacic dsity relativeto wine bottles, which would I have tleelrect ottacilitating the wine 'commerce. 1 the fail AVICELtort or the EiCHEQISgRk•en- Eralea the staterbeat of hit Bight Hon. laltiend. 11th chases were then added to the Bill; and the Bill; was ordered to be read athird time' ntheillst nYot i* 'rich n'oet.ll: Theastat. tolonel SARttlf rose to move for the ptetlettibn or tert a* papers bog' iThpdriance, at,they dispett ea the discussion ith 14 , a4 to tett pie& ifs tttat i Wet. ant the itr tiett theatit. Vire doctithentsi Move ref ith the first inistance wee-e, 44 oefieS bt inibttratfott on which the tommitments of certain persons to thb gaoler Neisigate, Dablih, tor a tempi , raq to that4er the Lista Destetninti were !bunted." 1 Thebe transactions originated on the llth if Dilkein beriust: An the day aftse t several persons wet* likidgisr 'beta* 'the Magistritesi Istrket them wede charged with rick and the,' set‘t* timatiltted to the ofl Newgate, where they remalhed • on this - Shiite • until the . 28d. On that day warrants of detainer tvete otakilltn eintrging 'them with an at ! Ifibpt tri- 1 / 1 11 avid inttrtlior the' Lord Lieutenant.— ' -(4oughter').--On the - mask dip; one Names Forbes, .was taken_ op and committed for the same conspiracy. When the Right Honourable Gentleman did not deem it advisable to proceed on the capital charge against those persons, bairwas entered into by them to a wry considerable amount, and the Right Hon. Gentle man..gave 'notice, that he intended to proceed by ex ;d r um information. He (Colonel Barry) had not brought this matter forward sooner, because, until the Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr; Plunkett) entered a rinli prosetiui, it might have been asserted that some . public inconvenience would result from the produc . non 'of the necessary information. It was natural to suppose, that this attempt to fix a stigma upon a veil considerable body of men, must excite a great degree of abhorrence at being supposed capable of such atro city, as conspiring to murder the Ki ng ' s representa tive.' He tad no doubt, at the time the commitment was advised, that it was believed that there was such a conspiracy; but he believed that not a single man in Ireland now retained that opinion. If theGorern ment of Ireland had been deceived in the transaction, .and had now altered their opinion, lie could not con .ceive, but in bringing the subject before Parliament, and giving them an opportunity of avowing it, he was doing them a service. Colonel TRENCH seconded the motion. Mr. PLUNKETI' rose, and said, that as far as his conduct was concerned, as far as his name and cha-, racier, and responsibility, were connected with thel transactions to which the Hon. Member alluded, he, was most earnestly anxious that the most minute de tail of every part of his conduct should be laid be fore the House and the country--(Hear, Hear). — Yet, strong as was his anxiety for such develope merit, he could not consent to sacrifice to his own. personal gratification a principle which was founded in public justice, and which was intimately connected with the ordinary and judiCious course of legal pro ceedings in this country. The Hon. Gentleman who had brought the motion forward had certainly done . so with temper, and he should presume that a pure abstract love of justice, connected with an important: political question alone actuated him, although the; Hon. Member Must'perceive that the motion of the. Member for Armagh would place him on his trial on thelsth April, and the motion of this evening would, in a manner, place him .on his trial that night. It was,; therefore, somewhat inconsistent in the Hon. Member,+ Whose notions of pure and perfect justice had received ! such a shock, with respect to a second trial of thel rioters in Dublin, to have condemned him to undergoi two trials, to which these two motions would subject! him.—(Hear, hear). With respect to the committal, on a charge to kill and murder the Lord . Lieutenant, if the Hon. Mover had been acquainted with the course of legal proceedings, lie would know it was , one thing to commit a man on a charge, and another to bring him to trial on that charge. 'lnformation, be tween the time of committal and the time of trial,' may be obtained, so as to justify the alteration of a slight . charge into a capital one, or Bice versa. He would lay before the House the circumstances under . whiCh the capital charge had been preferred. On the 14th.of December the Lord Lieutenant intimated-his intention of visiting the Theatre. !An intimation had been given to him of an intended manifestation of displeasure, in conseiluence of his having caused the discontinuance of dressing the statue of King William the Third—a ceremonial that had been in dulged in for some time in Dublin, for the purpose of insulting the Catholic population of the country.— On entering the Theatre tumult arose. His Excel lency was received with Winn applause Tram the un bought and unpackedportion of the audience. How ever, another portion ranged in the tipper gallery cf the house and other parts, continued a violent system of hissing. Handbills were flung from the gallery, .not only insulting to Lord Wellesley's person, but also to the Catholic population, bearing the inscrip tion, No Popery," " No Popish Government," &c. This annoyance continued without interruption until after "GOD save the King" was played, and at that part of the performance a rattle was thrown by Gra ham, which cut the cushion of the box next to the one in which his Excellency sat; and a bottle was thrown from the left-hand side of the gallery, which passed over the pit of the Theatre, and after having hit the drop-curtain midway between the centre of the cur tain and the Viceregal box, rolled upon the stage.-- Here the Learned Gentleman described the construc tion of the House, and sheaved, that although whilst seated in his box a missile could not reach him, yet when he stood up and advanced to the front of the box, it might easily have done so; and it was at such a time of the performance that the missiles were flung. When the.bottle had been mentioned by the Hon. Mover, he thought he heard. a laugh—(Hear). It seemed a jeu d'esprit—a merrinient to some Hon. Members—(Chiers from the Opposiiion)--the mani festatioti of merriment had now been followed by cheers on the repetition of mention of this bottle. Gentlemen might act as they thought proper, but they were egregiously mistaken if they supposed that such interruption could embarrass him. " I would recommend (said Mr. Plunkett, emphatically) to those . Gentlemen who are so anxious for the manifestation or feeling, to confine themselves within the decorum's of the House, and to suppress the expression of their sentiments until it has devolved upon them to do so in the legitiinate and ordinary progress of debate. I never interrupted a Gentleman myself, and ido not . eiwel ask too much when I ask of others to reel precme that courtesy. In despite of such intemption, Ude saY that no person can fairly contemplate the fad of such an atrocious insult offered to the Re presentative of the King, and offered because he had etecuted the King's commands and special directions, wjtbout giving to that atrocity the mast isttqualifted condemnation.—(Load' Cheering): The crime the Lord Lieutenant bed committed iris that of governing all•his.-Maicsty's _subjects jit , land according' to the pritiiiples.olequal Aria ittpar-. 1 141 law n —A.,Rertr,. Itear),:afer*, the Right lionbui aisle and &earnest Gen** . anfinfeied into a mai of the conspirati, as proved 44:4 1 411,tn • Dtiblith'ttd 4 sktplaiged, with gre4t force and elovenie, parti ;RAl. reasons and motives which-actated 'the Irish Giovinuanettt ju. the eisticii!et.lhe - tiatikparktieti. He CoacLeOeitbr Jblailelb;* %WA ° l l;t° ssrtie aoia the lsgality of thopr .. Indsasiictopted.^ I.o*Abririt atOtion ha kris tliegrouoill of the • • - the iiteth:# -- Usigist . do epl atargiconduct of I toe iittaleaz irhhinlght tekie Ou trial, and' • • also on the ground of the impropriety of exposing formation which had been given' to'66veritmetu ' der the protection of implied confidence. Dr. LITSHINGTON strongly condemned aU eret proceedings, as .ilangerotts to the liberty of subject. Ile.mus support this motioh.for Papet it was only to put hitnself in possession of usefu, formation. He had no bias :as regarded the llrish party question. He 7decide imj tially ; but how mold he do this.. if be carpe to discussion blindfolded and hOodwiukcid?. .roe 1 and Learned Member then proceededto corn rues the circumstances of this pretended conspiracy, stated by the Irish Attorney-Gener:ii, and content that even on that statement the Ri: ; t Hon. • Getr man had not made out the slightest case of inter murder, although there was proof that a tru meanor of a serious nature had been committecl o ., one which called for severe punishment. • • Mr: PEEL considered the production of these pers as not at all necessary to enable the How understand the question Which was - to dome April. The only thing 'necessary was the evidi prOdueed at tile trial, and that was given in' Vie' full report which had 'been patbllffied the'tri; Then, if these Papers were not necessary to ei the - House to 'form a judgment, would .it *be..,propei to produce them at all? - He-contended it would ne' inasmuch as theproduction of them might soh the Magistrate s who committed to a prosecut and.for this-reason he would oppose the motion. Mr. AtERCROMBIE wished to have the Pa; produced. Ile was of opinion the House was b' to-call for all the information in its power to on this important question. Sir .I:NEWPORT thought the Ifouse should cautious how theY exercised the great inquisito power which they were now Balled on to enfitc, The Papers now asked for he considered were not 4 cessary for the information of the House; but . would elect third parties - if produced ; and, there fore, in calling for them, the House would be gt 'of great injustice. For these reasons he - thould pose the motion. Lord A. HAMILTON supported the motion. Mr. S. RICE opposed the motion as unneceisary, .Mr. GRATTAN said, he should support the - tion. It was well known, that the -Lord Lieutena% was 'of one opinion on the subject, and his Chief' -eretary of another. The King's Attorney-General of one opinion, and the Solicitor-General of another; and the only wonder was, how a prisoner ever hap pened to be committed at all. Fur his part, he de sired to see everything fair and open, and therefore he would support the motion. Dr. PHILLIMORE thought no Parliamentary ground had been laid for the production of these Pa pers, and therefore he a ould oppose the motion. Mr. LAMBTON said,he should support the motion. He thought a _prima facie case had been made out against the Attorney-eenOral, and he had no hesita tion in declaring his opinion, that the Right lion. Gen damn had acted unconstitutionally. Lord HOTHAM and Col. TRENCH supported the motion. Col. BAARY'replied, 'and denied that he was one of those who wished to see I re la n d governe d b y a party. He wished there was not an Orangeman in Ireland, nor a single United Irishtnan; but it was not by law proceedings they would be put down; the March of public opinion alone could put down these parties. He was alto fully persuaded 'that Ireland never would tie 'qnlet' 611 party was put an end to.— The House then , divided—. For the Motion - - 32 • Against it . - 44 Majority against ft On the return of strangers to the Gallery, Colonel BARRY was moving for the production of Co pies _ of the Recognizance:. in which the P r i s o n e rs in Dublin were bound to appear; together with other Papers re tri the same subject. Mr. PLUNKETT said he had no objection to the production of those Papers. They were the same whiCh the Hon. Member far Armagh had signified his intentiott to Move for.-:—The motion was agreed to. NAVAL AND MILITARY i PENsIoNg. The CHANCELLOR Of the EXCHEQUER said that at that late hour he did not think it necessary to -trouble the House, with any observations, parlichlarly as it was not unacquainted with the object of his mo tion, and as he would have another opportunity of detailing it. He concluded by moving for leave to bring iu 'a Bill to confirm an agreement between the Trustees under 4a.ALct of Parliament of last - Session, to appropriate the Half-pay and Pension List, and the Bank of England. Mr. GRENFELL said, That he would istifinte. the bargain altogether —not from any blatne wtrich He attached to the Bank, but from the conviction that a tter arrangement could be made with the Commis sioners for.reducing the National Debt. After a few words from Mr. Baitirtscr, leaft-e wa s t% given to bring in the Bill. • 111SCELLANDOWL • The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER rave notice, that he would on Wednesday next (to-morrow) move an Address to his blajeity On the subjea of a Monument to be erected to 'the late'Earl . St: Vincent and j.ord •Duacan. Mr. W. WI LLI 41VIS obtained kave SO bring in ' A nal 'to regulate the right of v o ting at Biirciugh tkiSoris, 'arising -:rorn real property, and to prevent ocrasionality." •Mr. CRIPPS obtained kave to bring in " A Bill to increase the power of Magistratis incases of ApprentiaehiP." Sir BOUG HEY stated it to be his Intention to move for leave to bring in a Bill ofa sindlar deieription, but di ring front it in some paints, Mr. M.A. TAYLOR inquired, whether the Bill of the lioa. Gentleman (Mr. Cripps) related only to parish apprerfices, or included 'those bousiti Sf contract and indenture ? •Mr. ICRI.iPP,S said, It would apply to all apprentice s . . Mr. SYKES obtained leave to bring in a Hill to ante-;d •he Act of 7 George 41, relative to Quorum Ntsgivrates is Cities and Towles Corporate. MR. TX-SHERIFF PARKINS. • Sfr. HUME roue to plosenfa Pt:titian from the P.x-Sher'.ff, ah.Thirkias, stating that be attended pursuant to notice, w i : h Roe of his securities , to enter into the necessary recognizanc , ,s aphis "Otidoh againSilhelateeleettbis for A rundellt that one of his securifies, Air. Bworeason,:attended,,bvtAlse outer., Mr. Mures, , ne4k-cted to vend at th e appoined hour. The petitu:3 concluded by praying an extension of the tfnfle to aiotir him to • Sod ailother security. • . . After a few observations from Sir T. Bassett•and WINN ' th e Petition was laid on the tabl e . •• • • The other Orders of Dwi Were then disposed of. • ' Arts; the; w.e,xe r finished, the Chi e f Cl er k infar:rted. the Ai rsi xas t , that lowish Wilfred PaP%5 neiletted tti e oirl i he races sity iescigniziscaitb presseutehis Petition agui•.,t. the return or Itir. Kehl, foi the Borough of AtundeL Sruthea, in consequence, directed the Chief Clerk to rescin4:o::: t,r*r Wo4 3 llPOtra Ff4f r : cAlar l dinil.i• It was rerdude cordittgly_louse then ic.jOUrileb, a natf-p._ .1; i a til, ,..n .ru ii n ,... • . . all se- of the • pets, if ' . .. -tut in- great ' • impar- • ' ..,- to the e Hon. rent rent on cy, 4t tended :Tootle- ent to misde- 4 4 .and 1A ) . ese Pa- • 01.15 e CO / , • on' in , 1 , idence • • ie . dirk i t rial.- enable ( '.; Pg l Per d not.; Albjeet :titian; .. • i,. Papers bound . . obt i ir 1. I ild 6: * ` itorial . rce.— It lot ne- t they • 2 ; Id, there- . 4 t , 1: guilty I•iF, ' id 'op- '.l . 1 , . 1 S. • 1 ,! ' nary. . ie mu- C I tenant ief.Se- . : . i:„. ,- fl. t . I . 1 i , i t 1 :. , I i A ' •,1 'at I. ! , 1 a I , I i a l • ; 1 1 1 1 a , ; ..' •ii i i i