Star. — London, England, 1810-11-13 00:00:00

. sad stall kto your Lordships that he acted may in the exercise r,l a right. That he had a right to call together this asF'..mbly, for the purpose of judging of L , Yrd Castlereagh, 'and that in the exercise of that right he mo.,t magnanimously gave to Lord Castle. reagh a tair opportunity of defending himself; that if Lord Castlereagh did not appear before this tribu nal ind defend himself, it was his fault, and that he, the defendant, did no more than his duty in delivering to the public the result of those discussions. Your Lordships, in this Court, will always support the rights of all the subjects of this country. Your Lord ships will also redress . the wrongs which they sustain, and if that which the' defendant insists upon as a right be indeed a right, your Lordships will support him in the exercise of it. If, on the other hand, it be not a right, but Lord Castlereagh has sustained a wrong by the conduct of the defendaut, your Lordships will visit him with a wholesome punishment, and that pu nishment will . be the mole severe because he has in sisted upon it as a right. What right is this which the defendant insists upon ? That seeing in another pub lication, a gross and foul slander against' Lord Cas tlereagh, but thinking well of the editor of that paper, he feels himself justified to call upon Lord Castlereagh upon a bill of indictment, as he would state it, found in The Morning Chronitle, to answer before a Jury as sembled at the British Foriirri, and defend himself against those foul and calumnious charges which the Grand Jury, The Morning Lhronicle, states him to have incurred. The Editor of the Morning Chronicle states, 4 You, Lord Castlereagb,have abused your office to pur • poses of brpression—yoti havy unjustly pronounced ' a sentence against Mr. Finnerty, and have carried 4 that sentence into execution. You are sound, more ' over, by this indictment found in the Morning Chro g nicle, that you, the Minister of Ireland, sent to exe.! • cution a Mr. Orr, convicted by false verdict of a g Jury,although he was known to r u to be inno • cent, and notwithstanding that tlO Judge who tried ▪ him represented to you that he believed him to be 4.innocent.' These charges, says the Defendant, are found eigainst you, in the Bill of Indictment preferred in the Morning Chronicle, and I call upon you before my. tribunal, the British Forum, to answer these charges.. I tell you, you will have a fair trial before the public, who feel horror and indignation at the crimes which you have committed. I tell you, (the mockery of expression he uses is) if the gentle Lord Castlereagh can prevail upon himself to appear before this tribunal, he will be patiently heard ! Patiently beard ! By whom ? By all those,-who at the expence of; shilling a-piece, actuated by mischiet or malice, curiosity or personal enmity (and what man is there in public life who has not enemies ?) against Lord Castlereagh. I call together all these to the assembly which I have advertised, for the purpose of precent ins to an enlightened public the judgment that a Jury so called together shall give upon this charge exhi; bited against you. And I give you notice, that you are welcome to appear and defend yourself igainst this charge, and that you will have a fair trial. Does a person capable of uttering such an address as the Defendant has uttered to-day to your Lordships, does . be seriously imagine he can impose upon your Lord ships so far as to make you believe, that he looked to a fair impartial discussion of Lord Castlereagh's con duct at this meeting, this mock tribunal ; this self constituted and illegal (Court I was going.; to say) Assembly, for • such it most Unquestionably is ? I will not enter into a discussion of what the object, 'ilat the intention, what the view of the Defendant (who calls together and presides over the Society) maybe ; but I have no difficulty in stating to your Lordships that in the manner in which it appears upon this record to have been conducted, it is a most scandalous and infamous assembly. It is an assern-1 bly that invites the enemies of those whom it charges With criMe to come forward and utter their slander ♦gainst the person accused. It is an assembly which, is thii instance, gives out to the public, as the result of a fair and candid discussion, that which is, in truth, nothing else but an - addition to the weight of that slander which had been published before in the Morn ing Chronicle against Lord Castlereagh ; and I do not think that it is possible, by any observations to be made upon these papers, to aggravate the offence of the Defendant, or to convey to the minds of your Lordships, or to any who may hear them, a stronger idea of the mischievous blander, than the mere pe- • rusal of them must convey. How are they worded? In the first place, the publication of such a question is in itself a gross libel. Ought •my Lord Castle reagh's conduct towards Mr. Finnerty, during the * late Expedition to Walcheren, to be approved as a 6 salutary measure of precaution to preserve order • and discipline amon his Majesty's forces, or repro * bated as a fl ►grant infringement upon the liberty of • a British subject, and a cowardly act of oppression d against =innocent individual r Shall it be permit ted to any man to call together a multitude for the purpose <I discussing a question ptoposed to them, whether one of their fellow subjects,' placed in the si tuation in which Lord Castlereagh then was placed,' bad been guilty of soloul an offence as is imputed to Lim, at least hypothetically imputed to him, in this Question so pot. How do they proceed The statement of Mr. Finnerty's treatment by Lord Castle. reagh, as it appeared in the Morning Chronicle of Tbursday, the 23d instant, has been read with the most lively emotion, and has excited universal asto nishment and alarm." , Then he goes on—"lf the gentle Lord Castlereagh can muster sufficient confi- I den"ce to venture into a public Assembly, of free and independent Englishmen, he may rest asgured that he shall have fair play." Now; youriordships will bee vi:hat fair play in this mjack tribunal LordCastlereagh was likely to meet wit h " there is nothing for which the Managers-of this institution more ardently long, than an opportunity of tueeting his Lordship and his ' adherents tace to face, and • hearing them vindicate' their character and conduct before this society. Now, how is that expressed ? " before an outraged and in= suited country," so that they go first to the decition, that Lord'Castlereagh, by his conduct, has outraged and insulted the country—and then they call Lord Castlereagh before this outraged and insulted people, to address them, and persuade them thit they have al ready come to an erroneousjudgment upon the subject. Now, that is the first publication. What is the -.tes, 14 that last and malignant .d present import defacing the bills, several No of the calumny, and of him who only adopts it. My Lords, that depends yery much upon .the cir cumstances—l am of opinion, in this case, that the offence of Mr. Jones has about it all that can be im puted to the author of the letter in The Morning Chrr and also more, that was the pUblication of what Mr. Finnerty chose to consider as a charge against Lord Castlereagh—for that Mr. Finnerty is to answer, but the defendant who now stands before your Lord ships for judgmeqt, could not read that publication of Mr. Finnerty's against Lord Castlereagh without seeing that it was a gross libel upon his Lordship—he could not be ignorant of that—but seeing that it was a gross libel against Lord Castlereagh, and not pre tending himself; I will not say to have received any injury, but to have suffered any thing at the hands of Lord Castlereagh, he voluntarily, unconnected with the transaction himself, chuses to call Lord Cas tlereagh before his tribunal at this British Forum— repeats the charge against him—tells him that the public are outraged at the offence which is imputed to him, and calls upon him to defend himself—and ultimately convicts him of all the offences which had been imputed to him in that paper 'in The Morning Chronicle. Mr. Finnerty, in The M-,rning Chronicle, pretending to think he had been injured by Lord Cas tlereagh, states the grounds of that injury. Mr. Jones, at the British Forum, repeats that libel, which was stated in The Morning Chronicle by Mr. Finnerty —he was no party in the business himself—he thrusts himself into it—he volunteers as the manager of this debate—le calls together persons of a certain de scription to discuss whether Lord. Castlereagh be or be not guilty of these charges—be serves a summons, a mock summons, upon Lord Castlereagh, to attend this trial, which he knew Lord Custlereagh must be mad if he or any of his friends attended, and then, because he does not attend, he pronounces judgment of conviction against him, of all these . foul charges which were contained in I;4e Morning Chrenielr. My Lords—lf your Lordships can find any thing in any of the topics urged by the defendant, which will, really go in extenuation of this offence,' am the last perion who would desire to take from their effect. 11- any thing that he has slid relative to this institu tion of his--relative to the paper published in the I Morning Chronicle—relative to his belief of the truth of that paper upon the credit of Mr. Petry, the Ldi. . . , blemen 'and Members of the If use • of.COmmons) , toe of the Moraine; Chronicleassansi ; Lhope it will bet attended, and, after a very interesting debate, the ; a lesson to Mr. Perry himself, how he safe's such opener was about to reply, when a gentleman, intl. 1 üblications to pass into his paper again, when he l ir mately and personally cnecerned. entered the room, , s that his name is of such credit with a part of and having pledged • himself to attend on the nest c" . ,publie, that what he peblislies is taken to be in. evening, and either (len the debate or take aspart controvertible fact, and that persons of a certain de: in the discussion, the question was, with the consent scription . think themselves justified upon :he credit of of a large majority, adjourned." Then it says, "Lord his name to retail any thing that appears in his paper 1 Castlereagh or his adherents are peremptorily sum- —I hope it wilt be a lesson to him hereafter to be moiled to attend, and prevent, if possible, his charac, , careful of what he sloes publish ; but, if your, Lord ter from being consigned to everlasting infamy and ' ships think, than that does extenuate the offence of disgrace." My Lord, it is time that this gentleman 1 Mr. Jones, your Lordships will giveliini the weight and they who have not yet learnt it should learn their !it deserves. In my mind it appears at least not to ex duty. It is time they should learn, that no man, , tenuate—it seems rather to give countenance to an consistently with his duty to tie public and to the idea which lam sure the Court will never encourage ; law, can thus, without authority, call another before namely, that that offence which one man has com, this mock—this self constituted tribunal, to answer to mitted by a publication another may. without incur supposed charges exhibited against him, by men who ring much additional guilt aggravate in another pub have no authority whatever over his conduct, or lication, for that is the effect of the doctrine that the power to inquire into it—and whose accusations can defendant contends for. be referred to nothing but malignity and ill will ; lam reminded that I have not stated to your Lord nor, notwithstanding all ilia the defendant has said ships the third placard, nor indeed have I read the of this Society, can I attribute the conduct of those latter part of the eecond ; but it is in yens Loniships Who have acted in it to any thing but malignity and remembrance, having been read. by the °dicer et the ill-will against Lord Castlereagh. The defendant court, what he says respecting the exectitien of Orr has told your Lordship that he knows not Lord Cas. under the administration of the Noble Lord, which tlereegh, that he owed no personal spleen against excited in the audience visible emotions of horror and him ; therefore, because he knows him not, Ido be. disgust. In the third placard, lie states that not a, lieve that it is not spleen against the person of Lord hand was held up for Lord Castlereagh ; why. to be Castlereagh, but I do believe that it proceeds from a sure not, and although we hear from the defendant desire of attacking the public character of Lord Cas. to-day that there were several persons there who spoke tlereagh. I do believe that it proceeded from a desire. in favour of Lord Castlereagh, and we are told by of pulling down in the public estimation, without any him that Lord Castlereagh had a fair discussion of knowledge of the facts to which this advertisement the merits, yet the placard tells you not a hand was refers, the character which Lord Castlereagh has ob. held up in favour of Lord Castlereagh, which might tamed with the public. Ide believe that the object well be expected.. of it was to fix upon Lord Castlereagh the imputa. I was stating that, if your Lordships found any tion of having grossly violated his duty as Secretary thing in any pert of the address of the defendant that of State. Ido believe it had for its object to fix upon ought in justice to extenuate the jedgneent yeti shall Lord Castlereagh the imputation of s having (when it pronounce against him, lam sure you will give it its falsely stated that he was the Minister of Ireland) due weight. unjustly promoted 'the execution of Mr. Orr. I be- The defendant has mentioned that he was impri lieve that the object of those who called together snned on another account, by the sentence of another this assembly to ths debate, was to fix these imputa- tribunal, and he thinks it would have been More be tions upon Lord Castlereagh, and to lead the unwary coming Lord Castlereagh, that it would have been to believe that a fair discussion of the question had more magnanimous, if considering the effect of an taken place at this assembly, whether Lord Castle- - imprisonment which lasted four months, he had not rs h rea e was or wa, not guilty of those offences thus im- enstituted this prosecution. puted to him; and that after that fair discussion, be- My Lord, it is a bad excuse of a man when he' is fore what the defendant is pleased to call an enlight. called to answer for committing of one offence, that cited public, Lord Castlereagh had justly been con- he committed another which subjected him to incon victed of those offences. That was the object of venieuce, that that should render the legal consequen those who called this assembly together ; and will ces of this still more. lenient to hint thaa it otherwise ' your Lordship say, Ido not ask whether you will . would be. It is hardly worth stating to your Lord - say, that this can legally be done ; but will your ships, that this indictment was preferred when that Lordships say that it is any extenuation of the offence imprisonment, which the defendant speaks of, was of the defendant, that he saw these charges published not a week old ; but be that as it may, your Lord in the Morning Chronicle, and therefore thought him- ships will not think that a libeller ought the less to self justified to call upon Lord Castlereagh to answer be punished because he is not now for the first time them before this jury assembled, as he had assembled called upon to answer for a libel. :Your Lordships it by his placards, at the British Forum ? Is it any will not think that he who trades in a particular extenuation of this wrong, which he has offered to offence ought the less to be called upon to answer for Lord Castlereagh, that he insists he had a right to any particular act of offence, because he has commit do what he did ? Will your Lordships say that a ted many others of the same description, and has been less severe sentence ought to be pronounced against called upon to answer for them. I find nothing of the defendant, for the offence which he has commit- extenuation "in'that argument. If I eiose to search 1 ted, because, in. his defence, he insists that what he it, I think I should find much of aggraV:ition ; but did he had a right to do ; and from his so insisting, all this is for your Lordships' consideration. The' your Lordships must collect that he will do it again, offence which the defendant has committed appears Mr. John Gale Jones.—l have certainly by no to me to be a very grave and serious offence ;—itap means insisted on the right. pears to me to be more grave and serious, and to call Mr. ATTORNICY-GENERAL.—I understand you, and more imperatively for your Lordships' Attention, from I am, and always shall be exceedingly glad to be cot- that which the defendant has urged—l will net say rected by a person standing in the defendant's situa- in defence, but in extenuation of it—because, as far tion, if, in making any observations open his case to as I can form any judgment, every topic that he has your Lordships, I have misconceived, substantially, urged, hoping thereby to induce your Lordships to the ground upon which he has put it. I had certainly pass a lighter sentence upon him, has added to the collected horn thy general texture of/the defendant's magnitude of his offence, and has either shewn that address to your Lordships, that he thought that this he was proceeding (which he disavows) hem a &she assembly which he called together was rightfully con- of injuring Lord Castlereagh, or it shows that he is stituted, and that Le had a right lo to call them to- defending himself upon principles Which, if they are gether. That may be qualified, perhaps, by the pur- not checked, may hereafter be most dangerous to-the poses for which they are called. country.' With these observations I leave the case But what then has been said by the defendant in to your Lordships, fully satisfied that the punishment extenuation of his offence ? He says, lie thought will be commensurate to the extent of the guilt -- that that which was contained in the Morning Chronicle it will not go beyond it. lam the first to desire that was true, and he conceived • that there is a great dif- it may not go beyond it—but that it may come up to the measure of it. ference between the offence of him who is the author Lord ELLENBOROUGH—Let the defendant be corn mitted to his Majesty's - gaol of Ncegate, and be brought up this day fortnight. • TILE KIN V. FINNERTY. Mr. ATTORNEY GENERAL stated, that he was in structed to pray the judgment of the Court against Mr. Finnerty. Mr. CVRWOOD stated, that he had an afEdavit just put into his hand, that the defendant Finnerty was in Dublin, and had not yet been able to reach England,. but was expected daily. The ATTORNEY GENERAL agreed to a few days postponement. THE KING O. HOUGHTON. The defendant, who is the Colonel of the Halifax Local Militia, was brought up to receive judgment, for an assault on a Mr. Norris, of Halifax. The cir cumstances 'of the case were briefly these;—The de fendant, on the assembling of the Local Militia in May last, had issued strict orders against any soldiers lap.. in g found out of uniform during parade hours. A soldier in the service. of Mr. Norris had come within ' the offence, and was put in confinement. Mr: Norris applied for his release, and obtained a promise of it from the Colonel ; bug the soldier having been visited• in the guard-room by Mr. Norris, and growing inso- , lent on the promise of g..lting out, Cie promise WAS revoked. This produced some altercation at the door of the mess-room, between the Colonel and Mr. Norris. They parted for the moment, and Mr. Norris was going down stairs, when Colonel Houghton followe4 him, called him .some rash names, and struck him se veral blows. MT. AINSLIE addressed the Court in extenuation, and Mr. PARK in behalf of the prosecution. Lord Er.i.smionouctrobserved,that it was esti emely to be regretted that the offer of accepting a due alio. logy had not been embraced by the defendant. It was painful than respectable men, and neighbours, should bring their quarrels into litigation. Here both par ties were in a certain degree wrong, but the defendant was undoubtedly much more se than Mr. Non-is,— His Lordship then sentenced Colonel Houghten to pay a fine of 'SO, and give security to keep the peace tor three years, himself in fall, and two sureties in £lOO each. -LIBERATION OP FRENIII FRISONEEL Au .lifoymittioa filo& against Henry' Proctor, I *text' It repeats the question. It state Vlonday, notwithstanding the mean . al .0 % - attempts to stifle the discussion of the pi •\ ant question, by tearing down and defit a.Frovtdc4 lissemblgurnon* Whom we ' • ehaeavonring to procurer the nave of are. prisoners, w.ss read'; . he appc eang iii op :a c o „, The three French prisoners w re on th-ir this country, confined within the limits of til e Litchfield, and Henry Proctor, the defend charged by the Informati..o w i t h c ,„,d, jc.i bringing them from their s lid limits to Lend, the intent of enabling them to e,c a p,., to parts beyond the seas, ti the prejudice ot the and in violation of tine laws of the luid. To this Inf, - amcion, the defendant, Henry' pleaded guilty, aid WAS lemanded for want And ordered to .be brought up to receive judge ens day (Mu;:dAy) 1-rttlight. NELSOMS TJWER. SEABAN:C, uCIOBER This day being kept as die Annivers,r; : . glorious Victory of TrataliAr, Ind the ever-. mented Death of the Hero, the Tower v. 4t canted with the following lnsuiption on the Is.xkoan • • It/1(8106z Sat rum. One of the flags taken on board the Fan .1 the Memorable battle of Sr. Vincei.t, by hi, valour, after boarding, s‘ as nir,'llayei staff, under the British flar, with a di sc h age at the dedie.ttion, *hen GG.I 6 the mem..ry of )us Hero" was drank, W.th matt) ot%er appr. naval toasts. The above. Towir is with the greatest prop this day dedicated to the memory "t the Lettac als by Mr. CUNICINGIIAME of Atiche•ilt: vie, 1..61 sittution upon a high summit neat his of S.Litct)itts, overlooking an extensive rai.ge coast. The nails of Clyde, the B.t y of Ayr, famous and most ruble ha i b our Truon, by his Grace the • Dote of PutinaNn, and c , ,inpl..ted as to ad it a ship of a'*nt WO tons, charging aca 31 wart- from Americ the pie/Quad, and alongside the 1 arb: ur-breast about three fathom's at water at low ebbc,•sni - ' sheltered from all Winds, in smooth water, with, holding anchorage, having a most excellent and entrance. When finished, in the course of another or two, With two dry docks,. will be the most spacious dnd useful harbour on the west coast of this V' for his Majesty's ships, And. merchantmen, and safe access, in and out, with every wind blows. Nelson's TOWer proves a land-mark or beacon to seamen, seen at a great distance, sad pears as if k had been erected exclusively, purpose, but now embracing both, great) , heightens the satisfaction of the erection in the year 1798. LONDOA MARKETS. RETURN of WHEAT In Mark-lane, iecludiee oely 29th est October to the &I et Nov=4;4 Total 10,371 Average 63.. 9.1,(1. lower than last return. A IiETURN OF FLOUR. From the 27th 01 October to the fid of Nevmeber Total 20,338 sacks—Average e9s. Std. Os. Od. higher than last return. INSPECTOR'S RIiTUAN AT UXBRIDGE, November Wheat per load 211. Os. to It Barley, per quar6 • 544. —d. to 4Si. Oats tea. —d. to Sas. Reins 561. —4. to sot. Pets ter NIL SMITHFIELD MARKET, November 12. To sink Ake °hal per stow of Alb. Boot Als. Oct. to 56. Od. Veal 54. Mss ton 40. Od. to Ss. ed. Pork Si. 44. t CATTLt TWIS PAT Beasts, about 11850--Shecp anti Lambe, 17,500. •t Calves, 20u—Rigs, SOO NEWGATI AND LEADENHALL MARKET Per stone of sib. by the arose. Beet 31. 4d. to 42. 4d. Veal 4s. Od. to Mutton 46. Od. to Si. 3d. Pork 5l 44. to PRICES OF WAY AND STRAW. • . ST. )11)A111'11, . . Worrecnarast Hay 51. lA. pi' Of - }Se. Hay 41 62 to straw Si. Os. to IL' Os. Clover 11. so to I Strait 11. 10s. to PRICE OF HA.Y AND STRAW IN /MI cHFIELI Meadow Hay 51. 10s. toll. 01. Clover 61. Os to ' New ditto 01. Os. to 01. Os. New do. 01. 10 to Straw SI. 61. to SI. Os. PRICE OF HOPS IN THE BOROUGH MAREET Bags Pockets Kest SL 102 to 7L 15s. Kent 61. Is. to Sussex 51. ei. to 71. Cs. Sussex Si. is. to Farnham, Pockets, ell Os to £l4 Os PRICE OF LEATHER IN LEADENHALL MARKS., Butts Lid. 93d. Galt Skins --"•• ` Ditto 25d. 26d. Ditto .., . Merchants Backs Lod. 216. Ditto Dress°.ng Hides 17d. 194. Small Seals 32 Id.. Fine Coach Hides 19d. 214. Large ditto 1005. Cr." Hides for cum 19d. 22d. 'fanged Horse Mies Ditto 17d. 19d. Goat Skins RAW HIDES. Best Heifers and Steers (per Ordinary ts. od. stone) Si. Od. to Si. td. Market Calf 162 Middlings 3a. 6d. to 2s. sit. English Hone 132 so PRICE OF TALLOW. St. lames's Market 4s Sd Town Tallow Clare Market 4s sel Yellow Russia Whitechapel Market 4s lfd White ditto per stur.e of 81b. ---- Soap ditto llis 74.1 Melting Stuff .1181 Average 4* Xid Ditto rough 36 1 Graves Ifs lid Good, Dregs ils Ors. • Yellow Soap, 905-Mottled, 1004 04-Curd, 1042, Price of Candles, per donee its 00-61glisulds. Ifs .. . • COAL. DIARK E I', November 4,... - Ships a: Market Sold Prieo4 27 Newcastle 14 so.. Id. VP 41 1 . • 4 Stu:della o Od.to 031. • $ Welch 6 *5l. Od. II SW N. COUNTRY MARKETS. PAR Kuwait Mgt oats's', Thursday.--Wheat was lhon• ad 10s. por.load cheaper than last Thuraday-tprice from 1017 Cu bad -Barley, adl7l3,atirr, 445. to 50s. per quarter.-Oats, 30s, to ' Did Beans, 60s. to 665. , -Ne, 465. to 545.-Peas, sac to Rye fis. 6d. to 7s. per baskel...4ares 72 64, to Ss. per do- .. ,Hlisham•Market, on lA'edneeday, was well supplied with 61" 5 ! and numerously attended by burnand sellers. At the Let! fortnightly market, on turstity, Steel of en ry kind wasp lent Markets are expected about this time to be very f u lly supOret as the great :all; of rain will necessarily ob li g e the graven' close their Leases. 01 turnip* ttstre is a receive the sheep when they are taken from Comparative statement of the Price of GI &saes MarkA on Thursday with the week November 1. Nt-• Wheat 965. to Ills. Wheat Barley 2*l to 465. Barley livers 565. to 646. i 1 .e.1516 Oatr 30i. to 365. bats SC$. Tuesday there were 900 bobs oatmeal . which sold at from l' s. 6d. to se.s. 6d. per peck is. 7d.-I'lliere were alio 67 boils of which sold from iCy.. ter 192 per bOli,retl. DALICLITU, Nov. i.-170.re were 1020 mirksit. Wisest and Barley sold readily. Ittis. to Si& . Gats.asout 22 chow, best per boll. I.ONDON : Vranted add p►:blimbod by STAR-OrricLs, Itioviv-112r, and 1"': re • Frct,k Cour4. p.tr . e e . i ,„ t.. l. iJ 4 ,4 'C.lrg : :Qui:, um go et lo st the rYPrrco r tilt Of 'Xi,. Ligintat „ ary rf de C. ie n big tut, n tae gi,ll I If the propriety 'rate N e, 'ln a s IlArb utT geof4rl. rr, and tlw , electing nd su far tuns, dig. • w:dtiu --breast in 3.4npletaly with clews t and safe other year ( 4 spacious s kingdom with easy t wind that F ✓ friendly t old ap. y, for that heightens ,798. My Neal I 171 gutty% I •eturs. etser. member Ist. 0 6 . 1 St. .44 • —l. Ns. —4 12. 71. d. to 7s SI SOO. ,RET. I. to U. 44 I. to is. SI ..to 91. 91 to PI 111 S. to sL.3I FILLU. to het 24 s to OS. Is RUT. . to 91. . n to 71. '" .151 ARKk T. 3144. 571. 42 SM. SO 4. So. zoos. 15C Is 19d 24 fats. 70 d, to as. ss. Od A M 144.11111 754. d /is d„ as d Oaf vi s owsi, Ms OA 011 6 toss. Mr 111 Oa. a to 635. • Oct. Od• o 008.. 1 ard 1 . 1 n SO*. to 5.%-• 561. to rouge moot abssodant creps rum gram, rf alibi ter ettrisril l week preceding: Kov• mbJ 8. tOs. to to 441. sds. to t.Cs. Sts. to 3.11. 1 in bliiibutsb teetketi per boll ;re tail Frio VI sf play awl batt.el rug ; " tail !b. Sa ?Cr pesk, )80 bolls if vein in Or Best Wheat et. Da de, it 255. Ns* Pea r it 4 LIVAL.KEZf, at 14,1. Carty-can't. ,