Star. — London, England, 1821-01-27 00:00:00

doubtful as to the 'right of, exercising such an autho rity ; if it were doubtful, caution should have been used, and punishment should not have been inflicted on an uncertainty. The whole shewing of the Argu ments at the other side evidently proved that some teing was intended to affect the dearest interests of tie Queen, and sure he was, that before an audience renresenting the feeling,s of the Banish people, jedement before accusation - would not be admitted. ‘Vas it to 6e contended that his 'Majesty could of his own caprice strike the names of all he pleased out of the Liturgy? For, if this weLe not contended for and maintained, the erasure of her Majesty's name from the Liturgy was evidently illegal. The charge against the Queen was but ex parte—the decision by Ministers was final, and thereby had they passed', judgment on themselves. They withdrew the 13111, evidently fearing the House of Commons might not' be of the same opinion a ith the Lords, and that pub lic opinion might, as it had done, boldly act against it. With all their professions of a love of justice, why did they not allow a right of appeal ? The whole complexion of the evidence against her Majesty was doubtful: why then pronouncea decided judgment? Such, however, was the Ministers' love of justice— such their wish not to excite prejudice ! The truth, however, was, they paid more deference to their places than their Sovereign. They brought on the measure, he sincerely believed, against their wishes l and their judgment. In the House of Lords they ' , had a majority of nine, and yet they preferred the .abandonment of what they said was necessary to their existence, rather than lose their places. They made no sacrifice, hut to their office. He would not longer detain the House, but he hoped those who thought aright and felt manfully Would not support 2 Governmere who had not courage to defend their; own measurce—(!rear, hear). Lined CAeTLEREAGII assured the House, that, at so laze an hour, and considering the state of ex haustion to which Gentlemen must be reduced by a discussion already too much protracted, it was nut his inteetion to detain them for any great length of time. He would endeavour to compress into as nar row a compass as possible the observations he should feel it necessary to offer. He must say, that, during . his knowledge of Parliamentary tactics, so rich a specimen of inconsistency, so rich a specimen of the abandonment of Parliamentary practice, as he had that night witnessed, he nevi:- remembered to have seen. In the first place, he denied that his Ma jesty's Ministers had a right to feel their conduct, committed, whether those charges turned out to be true or false. All they had to do was to take care that proceedings were not instituted against her Ma jesty on light and frivolous grounds; and that they had conscientiously done. They had not endeavoured by any influence which they possessed to bias the minds of those who were to consider the question: on the contrary, at the commencement of the busi ness, they called on those who had any political con nexion with them, to act in total oblivion to that connexion; and he thought Gentlemen opposite would encounter very little difficulty in finding instances where persons, who were even connected with the So vereign, had acted with the most perfect freedom. He wished he could pay the Learned Gentleman who had just sat down, and his friends, the same compli ment; he wished their conduct had been equally free from party motives ; but he believed every unpreju diced man would allow, that Administration had acted a more pure and disinterested part on this oc casion than their opponents had done—(Hear). The Learned Gentleman who had just sat down gave a very different account of the question on which they were to decide, from that which had been given by those who had preceded him. He said that the mo tion was a censure on the individuals in power; and he (Lola Cestlereagli) would assert, that a censure so disgraceful to those who brought it forward never was known—yezughter). It never had been the sys tem to select one point of censure against an Admi nistratioe, for the purpose of picking up a few votes which might be applied afterwards to their disadvan tage, in an indirect and covert manner—(Hear). No clear and definitive proposition was brought before the House. It was merely thrown out, that hereafter sometl.ing might he done with respect to the re-inser tion of the Queen's name in the Liturgy; but that ob servation had been followed up by no practical Re solution, and therefore it was evident, that the pre sent motion was introduced in the hope of securing the votes of certain individuals, who, on former oc casions, had expressed doubtful opinions—(clear). If they meant to do justice to the country or the Queen, they would have acted differently ; but he would maintain that they were sacrificing the Queen for the purpose of putting down the Government that at present existed—Wear, and laughter). With respect to the merits of the question, if Ministers had committed an infringement of the law, it was the greatest joke that possibly could be—(Much laughter). In the motion the words " ill-advised and inexpe dient" were used with reference to what took place twelve months ago, and which had nothing to do with the present circumstances. If the Gentlemen opposite had come forward in a bold way with a vote of censure, he would have met it with equal bold ness. Bat they had had recourse to a system of ma nagement, which could only be met by manage enenr ; and when a proposition was made that could lead to 130 practical good, it was fair to meet it by moving other Orders of the Day, or by calling for an adjournment. It was extraordinary that twelve months had been suffered to elapse, during which Ministers were allowed to perpetrate a great injus tice against the Queen, and at the• expiration of that time nothing but an abstract proposition was brought forward. The Noble Lord had, it was perfectly true, supported the same opinion as he did now upon a former occasion ; but the House then rejected it by so decisive a majoiity, that when the numbers were going to be taken on his Amendment, he thought it • better to take them on the negative of the original question, than to put his own Amendment to issue. Even when the question was so decided, the numbers were in favour of the original motion 591, and against it 1`21; of which latter number many would n..t have voted for his amendment if he had pressed it. If, therefore, the servants of his Majesty were in the wrong. that House was their accomplice in it; for it gave its sanction to the principle of their pro- ceedings, when it determined, as in July last, to Ad diess her Majesty—(Loud trees of" Heart' front the Altuiaterial ltau,ke.4).—As to the law of the question, he thought that there was nothing so decisive in the clause so much relied on by the Noble Lord, as to render it imperative to insert the Queen's name in the Liturgy. The Act of Uniformity was not passed out of any jealousy of the Crown, but to prevent en croachments and alterations from being made in the Prayers of the Church, and to put down heresies and schisms injui ious to the establishment. That clause, therefore, was inserted in the statute to shew that, though no alteration could be made in the general Prayers of the Church, those Collects and Litanies which affected the Royal Family were open to alter ation. The genius of our Political agreed with the genius of our Ecclesiastical Constitution; for so far from the Constitution being jealous of the rights which the King exercises over his family, it leaves each mem ber of it completely under the discretion of the King. This was the case with regard to their education and their marriage, and it would be a most dangerous precedent if Parliament should now, for the first time in the history of the Monarchy, take upon itself to interfere with the King's management of his family. If the King, in the exercise of the Royal prerogative, should be forced to insert the name of her Majesty in the Liturgy— ( Loud cries of Hearf —that would be found to be only the first step to greater encroach ments: for he should wish to know on what prin ciple, after such an advantage were gained for the Queen, she could be excluded from the Coronation— (Hear, hear)—and all those privileges of grace and favour which, in happier times, it would have been the pride of the King to have afforded her ?—(Cheers from the Opposition, re-echoed by the Ministerial . benches).—His Lordship then proceeded to argue, that the charge of prejudging the Queen, by striking her name out of the Liturgy, came with a very bad grace from that party, which, when it impeached that meritorious servant of the Crown, Lord Melville, ssruck his taras.. out of the list of Privy-Councillors before they brought him to trial—and thaC too, for no other purpose than to inflict an additional wound upon the feelings of that distinguished character.— Where, at that time, did they display that delicacy to Lord Melville, which they now so loudly, stated had not been shewn to the Queen ? But how did they stand with respect to the Queen herself? Had they not, with Lord Erskine at their head, who was always talking of the advantages of the Trial by Jury, and who boasted that lie bad spent his whole life in de fence of them—had they not, he would ask, placed her conduct under the investigation of four Commis sioners, without informing her of the existence of such ' a Tribunal, much less of the serious charges which had been brought against her? Had not that Secret Tribunal even closed its proceedings, without ever hearing a word of defence from her until they brought her up to receive judgment from her King and father? If ever the Queen had cause to complain of any party of public men, it was of that party with which she was at present politically connected —(1 kar, hear). — His Lordship then proceeded to ask, whether those persons, who had, upon mere idle rumours of occur rences abroad, deprived a valuable member of the Royal Family of that revenue which would have enabled him to live in his native country, were enti tled to accuse Ministers of acting with a want of de licacy to the Queen, when they had evidence of such serious charges against her? For his own oat, he ould say, whatever might be the present decision of the House, that under the same circumstances he would, with his eyes open, and with the experience which he now had of the past, pursue exactly the same line of conduct. Gentlemen ought to recollect that the question was one full of doubt and envi toned with difficulties, and of such a nature that he would frankly confess that it had caused consider able embarrassment to Government from the handle which it had given to the disaffected !—(llear, hear). If the law on the subject had been clear, he should, indeed, have been happy ; but it was by no means so; and if they had first inserted her Majesty's name in the Liturgy, and had afterwards found it neces sary, in consequence of her conduct, to erase it, the moral indignation of the country would have been so excited against them, that they would never have been able to stand against it. Ho allowed, that now that the Bill was withdrawn, the Queen was in the situation of a person technically ianosent, and she was in as full possession of her rights as Queen Con sort as if no stain had ever been cast upon her cha racter—(Hear, hear). It was one thins, however, for her to enjoy the rights to which she was legally entitled, and another to enjoy those honours which had been granted to her predecessors as matters of grace, favour, and consideration—(Hear). She hind no strict right to have her name inserted in the Li turgy : and when the matter had come to such a pass as it had done in the Lords, where one hundred and twenty-three Peers had declared her guilty upon their honours—(Loud cries of " Hear," floss both sides of the House)—he could not, as a Minister of the Crown, allow it to be granted to her as a boon. His Lordship then proceeded to state, that he felt compassion for the state to which the Queen had re duced herself; but there were so many circum stances that rendered her dangerous, that it became necessary to tear away the veil from her guilt— (Hear, hear.) She had lent herself to a party who, he believed, entertained views dangerous to the esta blished institutions of both Church and State ; and therefore he could honour her as little in a political as he could in a moral point of view. He would cau tion Honourable Gentlemen not to be deceived by her advocates, nor to be entrapped into the support of the present milk-and-water resolution, by any rash declaration that might have been made in the country. The country was now, thank GOD, com ing to its senses !—(Hear, hear, from the Opposition benches) —and the efforts of that party which had hitherto distracted the country would soon expire if Parliament maintained its present firm tone of deter mination. It ought to support the existing Govern ment in undiminished honour and character, or at once to extinguish the present Cabinet as Ministers. If any resolution were brought forward on the other side, containing charges of accu,ation, he trusted that it would appear in a distinct, tangible, and manly shape. Mi n i s te rs wou ld t h en b e fa i rly put upon their vial, and he (Lord C as tl ereag h) p l edged himself, that if there was a chance of its success, it should be resisted by no influence of the Crown, whose servants would rest their claim to public con fidence on the reputation they bad acq•iired during an arduous and glorious war, and a subsequent in terval of peace, during which they had never lost -- LONDON. SATURDAY, JANUARY 27, 1821. THE FUND& PRICE OP STICKS THIS DAT AT ONE 0 - CLOCE Bank Stock 2271 228-3 per Cent. Reduced 7:4 I 3 per rent. elms. 721 711 72-4 pie trot• 904 5 per Cent. Navy 1061 I i—Long Annuities 12A India Bonds 40$. 41s.—Bschequer /ills ss. tis. pre. Cons. for Account 72 721 1 1. In the House of Commons, last night, after a con: 1 siderable time had been occupied in receiving nu merous Petitions on the subject of the QuEErr's treat ment and the imputed misconduct of Ministers, &c. Lord A. HASIILTON brought forward his Motion relative to the omission of the QUEEN'S name in the Liturgy. His Motion was— ,, That the Order of Council of the 12th February, 1820, authorizing the omission of her MAJESTY'S name from the Liturgy, was most ill-advised and inexpedient." Mr. Rows- SON, on the part of Ministers, opposed the Resolu tion, not by proposing a direct negative, but by a Motion that the 'rouse should adjourn.—An ani , mated debate followed, which lasted till near seven o'clock this morning, when Ministers succeeded in carrying the Motion for Adjournment, by a majo rity of 101. The main question, however, wf i rl hardly be con sidered, by the public, as finally settled, The legality of the measure remains still to be ascertained, and this may be tried in a variety of ways. One thing is certain, that no act which in itself violates any po sitive Statute, can be rendered legal by an Order in Council ; for were this the case, the passing of laws by the three Estatcs iu Parliament ./..it:cmbled, would be a mere nullity, and the very asserrobli liament itself would deserve to be chart, the classical language which one of t!1( applies to County Meetings, as a mere Nay, more—Parliament itself cannot by adjournment, give legality to any Order which opposes a positive Statutc—o r whatever, excepting only in passing, a Parliament may repeal, but cannot, i n way, set aside any law of the land.—vvh 4, the real legal construction of the Statetr the Prayers for the Royal Family ? If 'Ali; not violated the Statute, it may still be whether they gave good advice to his , but, on the other hand, if they shall be foul advised a breach of positive law, they ml or later, answer for it. A Flanders Mail arrived last ni,9,!:t, hardly anything deserving of notice. ' Gazelle announces, that the great corm of BERKSTER and Co. have stopped rip that Viscount CIIATEAVBRIAND, the n e , Ambassador, had arrived at Berlin from ' The Paris Papers of the 2:3d also au night. They anntnince the arrival of M 7 in Paris, on Sunday last. The KING had not left Berlin on the 12t . .i, as stated the German Papers.—French 5 per Cent This morning the Paris Papers of the to hand. They present nothing interesti THE KING'S LEVEE. Yesterday HIS MAJESTY held his fir, mentary Levee, which was ve: y numeno tended. A more than ordinary degree was excited in the public mind, by the th it a great number of Addresses we!e seined ; the crowd was, therefoie, unusual! His NIA - JesTY entered the State apartment o'clock, and received his august visitors, by the Dukes of Year:, CLAEr:Nce, and TON ; the Earls of LIVERPOOL and BATIII." BIDMOUTH and CASTLE/MAUL-SIC. Ste. distinguished Members of Opposi'ion, most presented Addresses in favour of the Qum, the dismissal of his MAJESTY'S present Mir' the Dukes of BEDFORD, DEVONSHIRE, STER ; Earls GROSVENOR, CARNARVON, Lords HOLLAND and ERSKINE ; the Mari cisrocx, and Mr. LAMBTON. The LORD LONDON, Sir W. CURTIS, Sir C. FLOWEI HUNTER, and a greet number of Military were also present. Among other Addresses was one from the Coi poration of Dub/ . up by the LORD MAYOR and Sheriffs, several other Members of that Corporation, State robes, and were most graciously receiv horses were most splendidly decorated w; and Royal blue ribands, and attracted.,. tion. About three o'clock some of t h e corn' parted, but the Levee did not conclude till The following were among the tations to his MAJESTY : Lieutenant Edward Hall, R.N. on his retard from of Saxe Meiningen and Coburg, with dispatches for Highnesses the Duke and Duchess of Clarence, carried out the important and gratifying intelligence of the Princess Elizabeth, by the Earl of Mayo. Dr. Andrew Halliday, by Viscount Sidmouth, copy of the History of the Royal Family, dedicate jetty, on which occasion he received the honour of the King having been pleased previously to no4i Knight Companion of the Royal Order of Guelph. Alderman Inolham, to present an Address from ration of Tallow Chandlers, Soap Boilers, and Makers, or Guild of St. George, Dublin. The lion. Captain Edward Cust, M.P..sth Dragons, being appointed Equerry to his Royal Highness Prince I and upon his marriage. The Mayor of Limerick, with a Loyal Address Mr. Alexander R. Stewart, with an Address from of Londonderry. Mr. ('harks P. Archer, Sheriff's Peer of Dublin, Corporation, to present the Address front the Cutlers tioners' Corporation. Alderman Cash, to present the Address of the dens, and Brethren of the Corporation of Cutlers, Guild of St. Luke; Dublin. Right lion. Sir W. Rae, Bart, Lord Advocate by the Lord in Waiting. Colonel Sir Robert Steele, on his marriage, by ! the Duke de Frias, the Spanish Ambassador. Captain Slegg, of the Royal Dragoons, by Waiting. NAVAL INI'ELLIGENCE. FALMOITTIN. JAN. 24.—Arrived off this port tii.sess, from St. Andrew's in five meek., for I The Dutch galliot Vrow Elizabeth, VireENS, which on the 40th inst. leaky, Is discharging her cargo to • I•I. MOUTH, JAN. N.R.—Arrived ' SALA Ills, from Dainzic. l'oassasomm, J•\. 26.—Wind E.—The Mary, reported last alight as from Lisbon, is from London she has sailed to-day fur Lisbon ; sailed the Lord DAVIN, for Jamaica. JAN. M.—Sailed the Princess Charlotte. of Or:lnte packets, with Mails for llolland. DEAL, JAN. 26.—Wind I%l.N.E.—Caftle down from and salleki, the Maria, TArr, for R. Lucia. A fora, suppocd to be French, got entangled on the Good , hut boats having been sent to assist her she is now tfie South Foreland. Sailed his Majesty's ship wcitw•ard. 1)0%Ell, JAW. 26.—The American brig Mars has dentned, not being worth repairing. The Mr cunt r, has brotight in a fine lugger, with :560 tubs Custom JAW. 26.—lintered [awards • well, from Jamaica; Deception, from Boulogne St. John's.— Entered Outwards : Margaretta, tor 1 fnr Lisbon; Atlantic, and Ann and Sarah, for I'ristiana, for Amsterdam; Colon, foe Antwerp Naples; Throe l'ri , snds i , for Chtend; ParfAit Lnien, - Ck.tred Outwards: Merchant's Friend, for Palermo for Cork; Elizabeth, for Lisbon; Marc, for Berisice7 for Oporto; Lively, for Malta; Standard, for Jr A Common Hall will be held on Monday. hoped, that every Liveryman who values his will attend the Hall, and be on his guard, and 1 the disgraceful conduct of the Mack Loyalists, are endeavouring to cast unfounded imputations the great body of the British People. In times these, apathy is a crime: let the Livery be on i guard, and if attempt s s h ou ld b e m ade to nt their proceedings, similar to those at the house, let them watch and expose the ;ndr." who may (Lire insult them with the like di,- 1.0 DON • rr.t reel erne nnnAli•Aed by lr.erell Krr►, l••elaM• Place, Temple-f ar. h. : ,Ol: ec fr 3.h dA ', a ; ' e ) f r l ri ! r r n .: l e: t 7' : e :et. i coa c i i ,e F sa:..lrh P a of t!le 1. mere "fo rce .. ,. not by a vote —or i i!:l s inhe' gy4 A ar ; ::: i h " vstrl: 11r1.1"011111 till to Lf!..a, e avv , :hey mt s t som e al° .sua Flat 3)4 tice. Th e 5 1 , 44 • kr commercial he at ed ray mer i t ; and par the ne w F rt . u.v , I front Pari s . "4. also arrived l at • rem od of Mr. CA NTINc : ING t f p kussit Gel ; stated in some Lg r Cent,. si 1 , 1, E at t of the 24th ea u ; Kos iteresting. -the taus VER. • his first P 4 ly y numerou s ly at , she degree of interest ii y the knot,..leJte - we! eto b e re. 1 1 intlSUrilloy I' irtment about two isitors, surrounded :e, and WEttisr, r e. BATHURST; lArds • & C. Anin ng on, most of ahnv i he QUEVN, and fa C ent Aiinhtersotee q mitts, and Las. r l RVos, and Gin ; ie Nlatquis e I,OIID MATOIi lbw FLOWER, Sr CA Ste Military Officer; ,ddresses reseal E Dublin, brought • !riffs, attended by • • rporation, in the • ;ly received. Thie •atetl with ornst -ac ted•great atm. I the company dot ude till nevi! lien numerous pub 3 eturd !rote duals 41 etches for their lei aarence, after hash itelligeuce of the hi Mayo. 'lnnards, to deb,* dedicated to his 31 .g , onour of Knightliod, ly to noinivate his s 1 Guelph. dress from the Carp kra, and Wu* fit .sth Dragoons, oli t . b hntss Prince Lespil i Address to the X$ dress from the Cool As of Dublin, ore dtY I :*_ i c , the Cutltn' and Sts '° s of the Master, War- tre . Cutlers, Painters, et I b 7 l Itivocate of Scald; w a l wh az,e, by Me &oiler lor. xis, by the Lard I Is ! 0111 ENCE. is port the Fideitts for Plymouth , - ENS, which F ut in lute cargo to repsir • rrived tke Elmo, 4 e Mary, Daum* hsi n London for Dim: the Lord Uaitocce t at s Charlotte and Prise '• down from the DO 1 •ia. A foreign PIK ' at n the Goodwin Suds * e is now at anchor 's ship Buses foo s E Mars has been co' • 'he Badger, Rog" :560 tubs of Tint* ftwards s The Da 4tilegne ; Union. 1 tea, for Dublin ; !rah, for 1 lariburter . Antwerp; ST ) P,„ fait unirn, for ulico• • 1 , fur Palermo; SUS" for Bethke; Or°. .- 1, for • on Monday- valises his right. ck Loyalists, wow ek-iseemgiiivemlui::PrcrlYeeuetdilla:tnaeo;iertoitixdironmidiltly:seesbwrnirjeAnTai,illr: an opportunity by their best exertions to promote the interests and welfare of the country—(Hear, hear). Mr: BROUGHAM said that be should have taken no part us this debate, but for some expressions in the speech of the Noble Lord, the whole of which was eslculated to give new. life to the agitations in the country, and seemed to have for its object to place the Royal Parties in this painful discussion in intermina ble opposition. For the sake of casting new stigmas upon her Majesty, and fixing upon her the charges Ministers had aban doned in their evidence, he had not only infringed all bounds of decorum, but all forms of debate; and with the artful sedulous ness of the pruner of a paragraph for a party Newspaper, had entered into a laboured analysis of the votes in the Lords, to whose proceedings in ordinary cases a bare reference only was allowed—(lfear, hear). If the House would allow him, lie could shew in what way the majority against the Queen had been com posed : he could shew how many of that majority owed their places, their patronage, their honours, and their revenues to the patrons of the Bill : he could prove that while the minority could not in the slightest degree be influenced by the party who was to be the victim, the Illustrious Personage who was the unavowed prosecutor was represented by his Household, and State 03- errs, and Dependents of all Ranks, and his power extended as well over those who waited fur the highest rewards a Monarch could bestow, as those who accepted even the lowest boona they could confer upon their adherents. Was not this of itself an array that might strike terror into the most innocent? Was not this an influence greater than had ever before been employed upon any individuals presuming to call themselves Judges?— (Loud and long-swain fled cheers). The SPEA KEIL here interposed, and a short conversation took place between him, Mr. BROUGHAM, and Lord Calvet exacts, on the extent to which the latter had referred to the pioceedings of the House of Lords, and to which Mr. Broug ham might be permitted to advert to them. Lord CASTLEREAGH insisted that he had drawn his statements from the printed. Jour nals of the Peers, and that Ministers had never made the Bill of Pains and Penalties a party question: Mr. BROUGHA M continued,— If true, this could not ap pear upon the Lords' Journals, but it was well known to be di rectly contrary to the fact. Ott no question in the History of Parliament had more party spirit been shewn ; and while Mi nisters, under pretence of impartiality, and with the cunning that belonged to Weakness, kept in the back ground, quietly, but industriously to:rapping securing votes, they left three cr four of his (Mr. Broughani's) Noble Friends to bear the brunt and odium ot the dehlte. L, the outset of his speech, the Noble Lord, with a charity peculiarly his.own, undertook to defend the Queen front the Noble told who tr.:reduced his motion, and the rest of her Erienl:. Ile had maintained th-t her alajesty was degraded before her tai tl—degraded by the confession of her Advocates. The House would know how to make allow ance for the delicacies and difficulties with which he (Mr. Brougham), in the instance referred to, had had to contend ; he was at that time as powerless to resent as to resist imputation ; and the Noble Lord, with an ingenuity in which few would be proud to be his rival, well knew how to heap together a few ad jectives and sounding epithets, and thus to compound a sentence difficult of comprehension, hut as far as it was intelligible, calcu lated to fill the ear and to delude.the mind. It was not for him (Mr. Brougham) then to say that his Royal Mistress was de graded : she was on the brink of an investigation where inno cence was no security, where perjury and bribery were united to accomplish one object, where the long arm of power, and the long purse of Ministers joined their influence over Italian hands and hearts, ready to crouch under the one, and greedily to snatch at the other—(Yar). From such a trial—from such a threatened persecution—the most guiltless might shrink, without for a moment incurring the imputation of crime. Iler Ma jesty had previously made her ill-fated voyage : con•rary to his and Mr. Whitbread's earnest representations, she had left this country, and for six years was all but forgotten. Now nothing, nothing was talked df on the other side, butt her increasing and inconvenient popularity. Why was she popular? And why were the hearts of all classes interested in her behalf? Because she was oppressed and persecuted : and if Ministers wished to sink ber into comparative oblivion, they had nothing to do but to abstain from that persecution—(Cheers). The people had witnessed a woman and a queen maltreated; insulted, trampled upon : they had seen injuries inflicted where injuries were pos sible; and insults where i n juries were powerless. They felt for her, because they loved the Monarchy and the persons of their Rulers with what an historian has called, with somewhat of a sneer " a childish admiration of Royalty." For this the peo ple of England had covered their Queen with the shield of their protecticr, and had covered themselves—(Loud cheers)—he would boldly say it—with immortal renown, as lovers of Jus tice and detesters of tyranny (Hear, hear, hear). After adeertirg to the notice Lord Castlereagh bad taken of him self, Mr. Brougham proceeded to observe upon the reluc tance with which Ministers, not long since, had been compelled to pronounce the name of Queen. In this respect he had lived to see strange changes. He had heard not only the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite (the Chancellor of the Exchequer) pro nounce the title as glibly and as frequently as sums of money to be voted nut of the pockets of the people, but even the No ble Lord had been prevailed upon to treat her Majesty with the respect which became " an old courtier of the Queen's, and the Queen's old courtier"—(llear).—What was still more astonish ing was, that in another place, where her Majesty had so re cently been upon her trial, he had heard even the Sovereign himself pronounce the name of Queen—(Hair).—The Hon. and Learned Gentleman concluded a most eloquent and powerful speech, by calling on the House to restore the Queen to all her rights, as they valued justice and the safety of the Country; for if she was not treated now as if she had never been tried, there was no justice, no security in the land. That question the flue-.:n could nee, r give up, and the Public ',multi never I bee it up. After sonic remarks from Mr. Alderman Ilevears, who supported Ministers, Lord A. Hammes replied. The House then divided—For the Amendnieut —3lO Against it •[O9 Majority againu the original Motion-101 Adjourned at 81 QUARTZ& arrows !RV= this morning. _ . . THE EVENING STAR.