Star. — London, England, 1823-04-19 00:00:00

BAKER-STREET, PORTMAN-SQUARE. DESIRABLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, With numerous attached and detached Offices, Coach-houses, Stables, &e. With Immediate Possession. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, By Mr. ROBINS, (Of Warwick House, Regent-street), On the Premises, No. -59, Baker-street, Portman-square, On Winsksza.y, the 7th May, 18274 at One o'Clock, iu Two Lots, By Order of the Proprietor, • tiVERY Desirable LEASEHOLD ESTATE, comprising a very commodious roomy Dwelling-house, containing, on the Upper Floor, Four good Sleeping -roosts; on the Second Floor, Two excellent Hed-chambers and Dressing rooms, and Water-closet ; Principal Floor, ,Two elegant lofty Drawing-rooms, handsomely fitted up ; on the Ground Floor,. a capital Entrance-hall, with Stone Staircase, and secondary t;itto; a noble bowed-end Dining-parlour, Library, Dresbing roum, and Water-closet ; the Basement contains a Servants'-hall, Butler's-pantry, Housekeeper's-room, Store-room, Larders, and Nine-cellars; Arca in front, with Steps to the awe, detached Kitchen, Scullery, Laundry, and Three Sleeping-rooms over, Coal-cellars, open Yard, Ste. A capital Seven and Four-stall Stable, Two Coach-houses, Harness-room, Ihy-loft, and Four Sleeping-rooms over. To be viewed by Tickets, and Particulars had on the Pre mises; of 111 r. D'Acre, Stratford, Essex; Mr. G. Laver, No. 44, Essex-street, Strand; at Gatraway's; and of Mr. Robins, 170, Itcgent-street, of whom Tickets may be had. BAKER-STREET, PORTUAN-SQUARE. Elegant FURNITURE, Noble Brilliant Plate PIER and iIIININEY-GLASSES (of large dimensions), Rich CUT- C; LASS LUSTILES, GRECIAN LAMI, and GTRAN DOLES ; the COMPLETE ERECTION and FITTINGS . UP of a SILK TENT ROOM, PARISIAN TIME PIECES, Eight-day Dials, and various other Articles. TO BE SOLD BY AUCTION, By Mr. ILOBINS, (Of Warwick-House, Regent-street,) On the Premises, No. 59, Baker-street, Portman-square, On WIDNriDAY, May 7, 1623, at Eleven o'Clock, By thWEIL Or THO Pi OrILIZTOR, THE COgTLY FURNITURE: comprising capi tal Four-post, Tent, Press, and other Bedsteads and Fur nitures ; seasoned Feather Beds and Bedding ; Cheval Dressing- Singes ; superb SUITES of BLUE SILK FRENCH-ROD WINDOW-CURTAINS, and the COMPLETE EREC TION of a BLUE and WHITE SILK TENT-ROOM,with Banner Drapery ; elegant Grecian Scroll Sofas, Couches, Chairs, and Ottomans, in handsome fawn-colour Velvet; noble Brilliant Plate PIER and CH I AIN EY-G LASSES, in rich Carved and Gilt Frames, of the following large dimensions, 111 inches by 43, 8‘ by 59, 99 by 67, 99 by .54, and 85 by 58 inches; beau tiful CUT-GLASS LUSTRES, Grecian Lamps and Giran doles, Cabinets, &c. excellent well manufactured Mahogany Cabinet Furniture of all descriptions for Dining-parlour, Library, Bed-chambers, &c. Cloth and Chintz Curtains, Brussels and other Carpets, numerous Kitchen Requisites, atent Mangle, Iron Repository, and various other Effects. To be viewed on Monday and Tuesday preceding the Sale, and Catalogues had, at ls. each, on the Premises; and of Mr. Robins, 170, Regent -street, opposite New Burlington-street PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS.- HOUSE OF LORDS, APRIL is. The Mr! of POWISCOURT took the oaths and his seat. . The Marquis of HUNTLY presented two Petitions from T ,, vemess, the one in favour of Agriculture, and the other praying that the Duty on Marina might be taken WE—Laid on the table. Dr. Smivit, from the Commissioners of Richmond Bridge, pre seined the Annual Accounts of the Bridge.—Laid on the table. The Earl of ESS RX presented a Petition from the County of Essex, for Agricultural Relief.—Laid on the table. The Duke of RICH MOND presented a Petition front the Clergy of the Archdeaconry of Chichester against the Catholic Claims.—Laid on the table. The Marquis of CA MbEN presented Petitions from the Hop Planters of several Parishes in the Counties of Sussex and Wor cester.—Laid on the table. Lord CA LTHORPE presented two Petitions from the Owners and Occupiers of Land of several Parishes in the County of Suffolk, one complaining of Agricultural Distress, and the other praying for some better Regulation for the recovery of Small Debts.—Laid on the table. STATE DOCUMENTS. The Earl of LIVERPOOL had made the inquiries which he had promised yesterday respecting the Papers which had been moved for by several of the Noble Lords opposite. With respect to the produc tion of the first, the answer returned by the Aus trian, Russian, and Prussian Plenipotentiaries to the questions of the French Plenipotentiaries, he had al ready stated, that an objection of form existed. With respect to the second, or copies of the dispatches from M. de Chateaubriand to the French Ambassador at Madrid, as they had been communicated through the Spanish Ambassador to this country, he believed there would be no objection to producing them. The next motion had been for copies of all reclmmenda- Cors from this county, - against any interference in the affairs of independent States. One of the most material documents on that subject, the Declaration of May, 1820, had already been published : he should produce in addition to it the instructions prepared by a Noble Marquis now no more, for the British Pleni potentiary, in contemplation of the Congress of Ve rona. With respect to the communications.from the I Spanish Government to this country, charging that of Pi ace with having given money to excite trou bles in Spain, there was but one document which al luded in a distant manner to the subject. It was a letter from Mr. Jabat, the Spanish Minister, to Mr. Canning, and was hardly worth presenting ; yet it should be produced. For it did not appear on in quiry, that any formal communications had been made by the Spanish Government on that subject. In saying this, he applied his answer to th e e question concerning the communications received, and not to the general information of which his Majesty's Go vernment might have become possessed. The letter of the Duke of Wellington which had been moved for, being of a confidential nature could not be pro duced. lle admitted that many dispatches had passed between the letter of the Duke of Wellington, an nouncing the intentions of France, and the instructions sent by Mr. Canning in November, but could not give a positive answer respecting their production before next Monday. The nen Paper moved for had been the communications made by France to the British Plenipotentiary between the 31st of October and the 12th of November, 1822. Ile had to state that no official communications had passed, though important information might have been given in a l different shape to the Noble Duke. The last motion had been for copies of the documents in which France had disclaimed all views of ambition and ag grandizement. These documents were already be fore the Public, and consisted chiefly of the Speech of the King of France, there could therefore be no objection to their being produced. All those Papers would be ready o❑ Monday Dr Tuesday next. The Marquis oft ANSDOWN said, he meant to ask for the communication of any information of an official nature which had been given to the Duke of Wellington between the 30th of October and the 12th ' of November ; for, from the different wording of the subsequent dispatch, he must have received some such information, and it was quite impossible but he must have communicated it to his Majesty's Mini- I sters, for be (the Marquis of Lansdown) was quite sure the Noble Duke would not have been guilty of an omission so gross as the non • comm unication would be, when he knew that his Majesty's Government were in a state of as great ignorance as he had been himself. As to the other point—the apparent omis sion for six weeks by Mr. Secretary Canning, of one of the most important communications ever made, he meant that of the 22d of October by the Duke of Wellington—he (the Marquis of Lansdown) now un derstood that there were intermediate communica tions, and which the House might expect to have pro duced. But what he thought the House ought to have was, the first impression made on the minds of the King's Government, and therefore he thought their Lordships ought to have the first instructions which they had forwarded to the Duke of Welling ton on the occasion. He contended that it would be giving a most false view of the subject if the first in structions,to the Duke of Wellington at Verona, after the Ministers had attained a knowledge of the real state of things, were not communicated. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, he had observed in the newspapers a speech of the King of Spain to his Cortes in 1821, in which he told them that the Congress at Lay bach had given him assurances that they had no intention of acting hostilely against Spain. If this had been communicated to his Ma jesty's Government, the paper containing it ought to be laid on the table of the House. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, he might have forgotten it, but he had no recollection of the exist ence of such a paper, and he believed that no such paper did exist. The Earl of DAOTLEY said that he had looked through all the papers, but could not find any ground for the expectation that peace would be preserved be tween France and Spain, and he could not conceive on what grounds his Majesty's Ministers had founded their expectations after the meeting of Parliament : but at last, on the Slst of March, all hopes were , abandoned, and a dispatch was sent to Sir Charles Stuart. What he (Lord Darnley) wished to know was, whether any formal protest against the whole of their proceedings was then delivered by Sir Charles Stuart to the French Minister? Some such thing, he hoped, had been done, for the honour of the country; and if it had, he trusted the document would be laid on the table. Lord HOLLAND professed no desire to press for the papers, to the production of which there was an objectionin point of form; but as to the other point, it clearly appeared from the dispatch of Mr. Secre tary Canning to Sir Charles Stuart, in page 45 of the papers; that Spain had alleged certain grievances. The words were—" Spain, on her side has, or pro fesses to have, grievances to plead against France of' ' similar iutermeddling with her people and herarmy.l She alleges that France has encouraged dissension a.id disaffection at Madrid, and that she evert,' by money and other means, fomented and stimulated the tumult of the 7th of July." Indeed, the transmission of money to the disaffected in Spain was notorious to every ;.ei sun: there was not a mei chant but what was fully aware of it—ilay, he believed that M. de Vll lele oad had the candour almost to admit it. That being the case, he (Lord Holland) thought it must have reached the knowledge of his Majesty sMinisters in some shape or other, though perhaps not ~ in written documents; and if so, he hoped the Noble Earl (Li verpool) would have the candour to state it. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, he could only re peat that there were no such communications, except that which would be laid on the table ; but he (the Earl of Liverpool) did not deny that such acts had been done, as the Noble Lord stated, by France ; but what he meant to say was, that there was no official communication made by the Government of Spain. Lord HOLLAND said, all he wished to get at was the grounds of Mr. Secretary Canning's allegations in the letter to which he. had referred. He was per suaded that after a careful reading of the Papers, it would be found that the miscalled pacific assurances of France meant nothing more than to obtain a longer time for their experiment of fomenting insurrections. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said that he had never denied that France might have instigated insurrec tion at Madrid; all he denied was, that the Spanish Government had made any official communication of the fact. Lord HOLLAND expressed himself perfectly sa tisfied with the answers of the Noble Earl. Lord ELLENBOROUGH said, the Noble Earl (Liverpool) ou the first day of the Session had stated, that Spain had declared she never would attempt to extend the principles of her Constitution ; and as papers were on the table, in which the King of Fran ce had disavowed all views of aggression, he thought it would be but fair, if it were in a written docume.it, that the Declaration of the Spanish Government should also be laid on their Lordships' table. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, the most material of the documents, in which that Declatabion of Spain was made, had been published ; it was distinctly as serted in the answer of the Spanish Government to M. de Villele. The Earl of DARNLEY said, from the Noble Earl's answer he inferred that he (the Earl of Liverpool) had no such document. The Earl of LIVERPOOL gave notice of a motion ea the subject of Appeals for Friday se'sudght. The Earl of DARNLEY gave notice of a motion en the sub ject of our Naval Force for Monday nest.—Adjourned. HOUSE 'OP COMMONS. Mr. DICKINSON presented a Petition from the Woollen Manufacturers of Somerset, against certain clauses of the Ware housing la.—Ordered to be printed. Lord CRANBORNE up the Report of the Com mittee on the Game jaws. brgi t t Noble Lord said on Thursday next he would call the meads* of the House to the subject of the lteport. Sir G. CLERK presented a Petition from the Merchants and Shipowners of Leith, against any alteration in the West India Sugar Duties.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. 'RICARDO presented a Petition from Fife, for a remis sion of the Duties on Stone, carried coastways. Mr. BY N G presented two Petitions from the Parishes of St. Anne and St. Giles's, against the Duties on Coals.—Ordered to lie on the table. • General GASCOYNE wished to know from the Right Hon. Gentleman, the Attorney-General for Ireland, whether it was his intention to bring forward the measure ot Catholic Emanci pation during the present Session? At present it remained as au adjourned question—(No, no). Mr. PLUNKETT said that the question did not stand as an adjourned question—it would require a distinct notice to bring it • • on again.. Although he had every disposition to satisfy the trim Member; Mid to give every information in MS polreci,yet he could not at that moment give an answer to a question so sud denly put. He stood, as a trustee for the Public, and his whiting should be regulated by the opinions of those whom he knew to be the friends of the measure. if he were to speak for himself, I he would say that he saw nothing to induce hint to Mhz fur ward the question at present. Lord MILTON presented a Petition front the Arclithatoory of Cleveland, and another from certain Members of the Clergy of the Diocese of York, in favour of the Catholics.--Ordered to be printed. Mr. COKE presented a Petition from the Land-owners in the : vicinityof Norwich, praying for a reduction in thel)uties on Malt. • Alderman Wenn and Mr. Wommousx supported the Petition. General HART presented a Petition from the County of Donegal, in favour of the Bill for the commutation of Tithes. Lord MOUNTCH Alt LES difered from the Petitioners in the view they took of that Rill. Mr. Bled )Li lIAM, on the past of his Hon. Friend, the Mem ber for Lincoln (Mr. J. Williams), gave notice of a motion for the 2d of May, to extend that law which made a Quaker's affirms tiOn receivable in a Court of Justice from civil to criminal cases. The General Turnpike Act went through a Committee, and the, Report was received and agreed to, and ordered to be taken into further consideration on Monday. Mr. F. LEWIS said it was his intention to refer the Bill to a Committee up stairs. Sir CH A It LES -LONG brought up the Report of the Com mittee appointed to consider of the disposal of the late King's Library. Mr. HOBHOUSE said that he would take an early opportu nity to call the attention of the House to the best mode of dis posing of this munificent donation ; in his opinion disposing of It to the British Museum would be found, ou inquiry, exceed ingly unadvisable; there ought, in has opinion, to be a separate establishment for the reception of that magnificent gift. Sir CHARLES LONG said, the Committee recommended that the books should be given to the British Museum, but the question, of course, would he open forconsideration. NAVAL AND MILITARY PENSIONS BILL. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER moved the third reading of this Bill. Mr.GRENFELL opposed the Bill, which he con sidered as improvident. Mr. MANNING defended the conduct of theßank. Mr. PEARSE followed in support of the-Bill. Sir J. NEWPORT contended, that the plan con tained in the Bill was a violation of the Act of Wil liam 111. which forbade the Bank to deal in public securities, and which, in his opinion, was a very salu tary enactment. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER ar gued, that the bargain entered into with the Bank was, in the main, advantageous, and that there was nothing in the Act of William 111. more to prevent the Bank from entering into the bargain sanctioned by this Bill, than to prevent them purchasing Ex chequer Bills, which they had been in the constant habit of doing. Mr. HUME did not think 133 reasonable persons (the number of the' last majority on this Bill) could be found anywhere, except in the House of Commons, to give their approbation to this plan, when it was fairly explained to them. He moved as an Amend ment—,, That the Bill should be read a third time this day six months." Mr. MABERLEY seconded the Amendment. Sir JOSEPH YORKE said, his knowledge of the four first rules of arithmetic was not profound enough to enable him to say whether the bargain with the Bank was good or bad, but what he did not see was the necessity of any bargain at all. When it was said that this dead weight was to be spread over 45 years, was it to be supposed that at the end of that time no spectre would remain ?—(Hear,'hear). If, indeed, at the end of that time every Officer in the service was to be as dead as Julius Casar, it was all very well— (A laugh). But there were 200 Admirals, healthy Gentlemen like himself (Sir J. Yorke), 800 Captains, 800 Commanders, and 3000 Lieutenants, with the supply pretty regularly kept up—(A laugh). How were the Gentlemen who were coming up upon half pay to be provided for when the deadweight was spread ? He hoped his Right Honourable Friend (the Chancellor of the Exchequer), who had begun his fiscal career in so understandable, a way, would not disadvantageously imitate his predecessors. Mr. RICARDO said, had the Government chose to raise that sum by Exchequer Bills, which it now meant to raise by this annuity scheme, it might have borrowed it from the Bank itself, at three per cent. whereas the Chancellor was now borrowing at four and a half per cent. This constituted the strongest objection to the scheme. It was stated, that the Bank had to pay I:13,000,000; but it paid this at instal ments, during five years, and never advanced a sum equal in amount to this. But the Government had granted them the whole annuity at once, and had this been carried into the market, the Government might have raised immediately between twelve and thirteen millions on it. The only species of Stock the Bank was allowed to deal in was Exchequer Bills, and for this there was a good reason : other species of Stock were subject to great variations in value, .but they were not. By the present scheme, the whole amount of the Debt would be greater at the end of forty-five years than if it were not had recourse to and as the Bank were at present the managers cf the Public Debt, and received very large emoluments in this capacity, he wished to know if the debt created by this annuity scheme was also to be managed by them, and if they were to be paid for managing a debt contracted by themselves? Mr. HUSKISSON replied to the latter part of Mr. Ricardo's speech, that the Bank were not to be paid, -that there was to be no increase of charge for mintage ascot of this part of the Debt. The Right Honour able Gentleman also contended that the Bank were allowed to deal in Public Securities, and the manner in which they had allowed the power to lie dormant,l so that the Hon. Member opposite did not know-it existed, proved how very harmless this power in their viands was. He was surprised to hear the Hort. Gen tleman opposite recommend an increase of the un funded debt, that was a resource for extraordinary circumstances ; and if that was now much augmented, the time might come that Government would have to borrow at six, seven, or eight per cent. Mr..RICARDO explained that he had never advo cated the increase of the debt in any way. He had only shewn if the Government were so determined to borrow, how it might borrow on much more advan tageous terms than by this scheme. . Mr. H. GURNEY also opposed the measure. Sir F. BLAKE followed on the same side by ex pressing his hatred of the Sinking Fund, which he said lie could not do in better terms than Dclenda est Ca M ri Bm ii r .aaagniV ANry,. u. ere Isro as hich ht i e d of a , i a t a oi h dl i : f a n g e t owo odt t a b e r kts, y tee i c l a l rid e nsreirt 3: aoii gil persuaded, l o tr. st f i eo W ao. sfr i 6unl there ii i :pn a edg m erser: c ta ß l e ni a e n d i .k should Stock oswould measurefall were several Bank Directors in the. Rome ihksil e 1 , 3 ; tierest was intimately conce, nei In this - mei . ..* h e b,ped they would rot sit and vote when tl.e House d'a vided.—A division then took place, when there wert v . For the third reading - 140 Against it - - 91 11Tajority Tne Dill was then read a third time and passee:: E. FOREIGN POLICY. Mr. MACDONALD gave notice, that he shorty; on Monday sennight bring forward a motion, pm; bably in the form of an Address tO the Crown, founded on the papers which had been laid by the ni g ht I lonotorable Secretary for Foreign Affairs oa the table. lie believed that the other House of Par liament either was, Or was likely to be, in posse ss i on of some further information: he wished to a4c the Right Honourable Gentleman whether it was his in tention to lay the s e additional documents before the House; or if there were any objection, in point of form, to his (Mr. M.) moving for their production ? Mr. Secretary CANNING_said he was glad to hen of the Honourable Member. intention to bring thi s question under the consideration of the House. With regard to the additional documents, he should him. self move that they be laid on the table of the House. MERCHANTS' VESSELS APPRENTICESHIP RILL On the motion fir the third reading of the Mer chants' Vessels Apprenticeship Bill, Mr. RICA RDO opposed the measure, as imposing injurious restrictions on a particular trade, and inter fering with the private rights of the individoaN con nected with that trade. He should move 7.5 aft Amendment, that the Bill be read a third time that day six months. Sir I. COFFIN said, there was a great distinction between theory and practice. He contended Ott good seamen could only be obtained by educating them as apprentices. If men were not bound appren tices, they would be as ignorant of the profession at the end of seven years as at the commencement of their service. Some of the best sailors in the navy were those who had served in the coal trade. Th e protection given to second mates was a most benefi cial provision in the present Bill. Mr. HUSKISSON said, the present measure had given universal satisfaction to the ship-owners, and all who were interested in it, and he believed there was scarcely a Member in the House, except the Hon. Member opposite (Mr. Ricardo) who was not satisfied of its utility. Whatever the opinion of that Hon. Member might be, the measure was unques tionably one of relief to Merchants, and of es!ential benefit to the maritime interest 13y the law, as it stood at present, every vessel exceeding 30 tons, was compelled to take one apprentice, and another ap prentice for every. 50 tons above that rate; wherei„s by the present Bill, no vessel under 80 tons was lia ble to. take an apprentice. After some desultory conversation, Mr. Paeans withdrew his Amendment, and the Bill was read a third time. Mr. H USKISSON pmposo rider, the one to ineltide thi Masters of Vessels within the second, to exempt transfers from the Stamp Duties. After a few words from BENNET, and Sir 1. CoErni, to, and the Bill passed. COMMITTEE 0: The House having resolve) of Supply, Mr. Lusunictol 4491. for the repairs of Hent Mr. HUME wished to kni ment had been concluded t. of the Public to Westminster ments erected in commernor were defrayed by the money Public were entitled to seethes in fees, whenever they wisl no other country but this di exist=—(Hear, hear). Mr. LUSHINGTON observed. manded went as emolument that expectation had purchased Mr. CROKER said, he was incur such a demand. The Abbey should public inspection, the only exclusion t profligate persons. He had looked discover uo authority for shutting try. He believed it was assumed was alleged to exist in the Clergy/ was compelled to ray that the Dean , bad on the occasion of the Coronation greedy, as to cut down some very ' growth, with the view of being enabled ground for erecting scaffolding. 1 Public was great, while the profit haps, amount to ten pounds. Mr. WETHERELL observed Churches, that it would be open the question of right or no right legal extremity. Mr. W. SMITH contended that no right to exact money from which ought to be met our of tin Mr. HUME would admit of right or no right in the Clergyman, and Learned Gentleman (Mr. %%reale be a very good course for a lawyer. offence, but the Public had nothing i tion. If the Honourable Secretary him Stith money to meet the expem a going—(a laugh).—with revect tbe'Dean and Chapter had any ri, then ; and, no doubt, as they had Would be glad to find a purchaser not eon vtit into money?—(Hear I agreed to. - Mr. LUSHINGTON next proposed the Repairs of Edinburgh College. Mr. HUME, had no objection . portunity of saying, that the House mates with very ordinary cuts. expense, and he trusted it would Mr. LUSHINGTON agreed necessary one. - The follewlig it £12,847, for ; defraying the expenses Patrick Harbour. ..C25,000„ for building and coati ledonian Canal. £5,300 for the New Insolvent The next vote was £50,000, for Westminster Hall. Mr. WETHERELL expreued the more eligible way to vote £1:. pose, than to appropriate JE3O,Ot;O was intended: The CHANCELLOR of the that he had recently been over the assured him that the Court of r would be finished by September, completed in the course of the nest The Resolution w•as agreed to, £24,926, for the Settlement on 5,214, for the Expeuses of 15,000, for making good tit,..4tuners relative to mates was a most benefi- nt Bill. I, the present measure had el n to the ship-owners, and it, and he believed there ayt in the House, except the 4r. Ricardo) who was not an hatever the opinion of that 31 the measure was unques- V nerchtnts, and of es!ential terest 13y the law, as it ssel exceeding 30 tons, was Prentice, and another ap- s above that rate; where ssel under 80 tons was lit- , 3 mversation, Mr. Bleating) B , and the Bill was read a lr losed two clauses by way of ; c the present Apprentices to he purview of the Act; the sof Apprentice Indentures . 4 I XI Mr. MARRYATT, Mr.G. ' .11C t, the Clauses were agreed• •11c a OF SUPPLY. ved itself into a Commit* ton proposed the grant .nry the Seventh' s Chapei r , le cnow whether any array", to facilitate the admixes" ster Abbey ? The mood; rtoraticn of public servile ley of the Public, and the . 01 !them without being taxed ished it—( Hear, Bear). --4s abl did that revolting practie bserved, that the money& uat :rats to the Sexton, who, q - one hased his office. inclined to deny the legaHtfi 1, 1 should be open certain Mersa 1: e hiOn to be made of disorderly tai eked into the subject, sod 001 , rag up the Churches of &hero& ed upon the freehold 04010110 0 ergymen. He regretted &CM rOll kan and Chapter of W • ' >nation been ao ill advised. stMr e v very fine old trees of fifty Yon' enabled to dispose of additional Tex, The loss of the ornament to the - u rofit to the Chapter did not..Petv • ved, relative to the gratthe. to mischievous results to 004 it in the Clergyman pushed 0 6 that the Dean and Chapter ele is the Public to defray urn. heir own funds. f no such compreinir „,_.**/ 411 ui ym., to which the 1100011 m Wetberell) alluded. 'That 010 swyer, be used the tare Owe fit bing to do with such s ceslo oo Wary (Mr. Croker) w1166 108 0 1 1' - :pense, he would set the peaks pect to Westminster Abbey, ray right, the Public woeld f 9 , s • had sold trees and stiestli 011 ! iser. What was it they WO!' The tear hear).—The Resolution! , r• StoP proposed a Grant of .C , 10,00: 4 1! . o f ego. mut the Grant, but took the it fa r I louse were furnished with Ills* That was a very WOO Ol His Id not be repeated. •,.. dret red that the e;pease was sums were then voted: • S pa if pit et Debtbrs! Coatis. comoof of for erecting the New zo:pillseetins ofg c th ert e al :or W ki ir if ill i lo4 PI M CP It wed his opinion,thseit WNW* .€1 4 20,000 at once he I trA GOA D,0.;0 a year for - fail Mlat3 the EX (MEl:ilia axi al the works with Mr. 10 1 01 4 0 . _. Plat if Chancery, and a9 ol 7_,,sfy it it rr, and that • eke wis0016•••• neat as ther e , bets abo the . 600 . 00 t r o nn ; the. Gold Coast frier of the Alien Department. the. Awarda,ot the 38140. AN( to Captured Waves. •