Star. — London, England, 1823-02-27 00:00:00

tency. He could not conceive howl 2s. was to be a pro tection to oar agriculture under presentcircumstances. 31r. HUSKISSON wished for a speedy deliverance from this debate. He defended the Agricultural' Re port; as being that of the whole House, since it had been adopted by the House. He did not mean to enter into a di-cossron on the lemis,ion of taxation, but I he could not agree that the reduction of the Tax on'. • Candles, would be very beneficial to the labourer, since it was only one penny per lb. The Tax on Winnows was not put upon cottages of six windows, or less; nor v. as there any House -Tax on tenements 'Oa a- year rent, or less. He could not follow the Honourable 'Member for Wiltshire, through his cal octilation of the reduction of 18 per cent. out of 67; but he contended, that the ,reduction of taxes men-. tioned by the Honourable Member, would as soon and as directly relieve the Manufacturers as it would the Agriculturists. Ile was glad to hear from Han. :Members, that they were not for any higher prices Hof Corn; but he was astonished to hear two of . them wish for no importation of foreign Corn under any circumstances. He did not think, that at present, there wits. any chance that an alteration in the Corn Laws could be discussed with anything like temper. Interests were too conflicting, and 'in a state of irri tation, which he could wish to see set at rest.— fly the C•immiL.lee on the Corn Laws, Gentlemen were convinced that monopoly was not always profit, nor restriction always a protection to the agricul turist. It also established, that the grower of corn, in England, was entitled to protection only equal to the mist den. which bore directly upon him. The Re po, t proceeded upon that principle, which received the sanction of the majority of the Committee. The second Committee went upon the principle of miti gating the severity of the Act of 1815; and the only objections to it were, that they did rot carry the pro tecting duties high enough, He mentioned these things as reasons why, at present, they should not attempt to alter the exi,ting.Corn Livia. They must • prepare themselves gradually for a measure of a more unexceptionable nature. He believed we had seen the noist of the low prices, and they must rise with the price of manufactures. By looking wholly to our j own supply, we might again be involved in that state from which we had just emerged. He should only weary the attention of the House by going fur ther into the subject, and though he agreed with the Hon. Member in all his reasonings, he did not think the present was the proper time for discussing the question. A moderate annual importation ,would be the best regulator of the prices at home. He hoped the motion would be withdrawn. ,Ir. CURWEN, in explanation, said he had spoken of the amount of relief to be afforded by the repeal of the Tallow Tax, on the, supposition of its being largely increased to the consumer over and above the amount imposed by the Government. - Mr. BENETT explained, and said that he had been anxious to shew that relief could only be expected from diminished taxation. He did not wish for high• prices, hut that the farmer might be able to subsist' on low ones. Mi. RICARDO said, that all who bad spoken after his H.m. ienu, had in fact argued in favour of his motion. His Hon. Friend. had made his motion to prevent the fluctuation of prices that had formerly taken place; but he thought his Hon. Friend had not R o om far enough, and did not seem to have a very definite idea of a fixed price. By the duty operating constantly, we should have security against a very high price. He thought the price had been fixed too high at 80s. He should propose 70s. as the price at which the system should begin to operate. He could not agree with the arguments of the Member for Cumherlaad (Mr. Curwen), and he could not under itand the calculations of the Member for Wilts (Mr. Bawl—those calculations seemed to bins to be wholly unfounded. The grower of the corn was affected both favourably and. unfavourably by the state of taxation. He hoped his Hon, Friend would not withdraw his motion. The principles of the Ho ' nourable Mover had a tendency to*dispel much delu sion ; and be (Mr. Ricardo) would not in the situation of his Hon. Friend withdraw the motion. He was an advocate for a price that would fairly remunerate the grower. 111 - r. WODEHOUSE, in explanation said, he ad hered to the belief, that an average price of 61s. would satisfy the landed interest. Mr. ATTWOOD said, that the allusion to the state of H 'Hand by the Hon. Mover, did not apply to the state of this country. In this country a high price of Corn had co-existed with a great increase of the Revenue, and a great consumption on the part of the People. In 1795, the price of Corn had been 775. the quarter, and had that price continued, there would have been a great defalcation of the Re venue, and the People must have been reduced to the greatest distress ; but in following years, though the price had risen to 100,120, and 140 s. yet the con sumption was great, and the Revenue flourished ; that had been owing to the greater quantity of money that was then circulated in the country. Mr. MONCK was in favour of this motion. He did not agree with the Member for Portarlington that all the Taxes could be thrown on the consumer. Colonel WOOD stated, that the present Corn Laws had been-the result of the most laborious researches, and any attempt to alter them must, in the present state of the country, be productive of much evil, by unsettling all that had been established. Mr. HUME approved of the motion. He should himself divide the House. Sir T. LETHBRIDGE was adverse to the agita tion of the question at the present moment. Mr. WHITMORE replied. lie would not press the House to a division himself; but should any other Member do so, he must vote for his own motion. Mr. S. WORTLEY was of opinion that the system of the Corn Laws should be altered. There was no safety for the country, except by opening the ports under certain regulations. Mr. LEYCESTER said, that, to reduce the cost of production, taxation must be previously reduced. The I loose then divided—For the Motion as—Against it 73 —Majority 5,-Adjourncd at Half-past Teu otlock. On Tuesday 141 the State Lottery was drawn. when No. 1,467, a Prise of £16,000, No. 1,305, a Prize of d 2300, and No. 4,048, a Prize of £2OO, welt! ail Sold in ShareA, f+yJ. and J. Sistwitronv, No. 37, Cornbill; No. 11, Holborn; and No. 38, Haymarket. The lurtunate Holders may receive their MOlll.l on demand.—Tickets and Shares for a New Lot tery, containing Three Prizes of .010,000, and 80 other Capitals, All Mosey, to begin drawing on the 9th April, will be oa Sale .1.1 a few days. LORD PORTSMOUTITS CASE. • EXAMINATIONosasa seta Is I NG'S COMMISSION. • Irdriiiirra DAT, WZDWIeSDAT, FIARtlAax 26. The Coat t opened at• ten o'clock this morning, and immediately proceeded to busines. tlanhhead's examin a tio n resume d by M r . Mex.—fiend Lad y Porettnoteh say, that if his Lord s hip should live with her again neither Mr. Abler nor any member of the Hanson family should enter the house again without his Lordship's concurrence; consideted himself in connection with his lendship's family merely as a medical practitioner ; delivered a latter tram her La dyship to Lord Portsmouth; also a list of witnesses from Mr. ranee; was not aware that his profession excluded him from a right of action as a man and a gentleman; has often had his attention called to insane patients; it. was not very common in ordinary cases of insanity to question the patient upon the sub ject or subjects with respect to which they are deranged in their minds; did not consider his Lordship as deranged on any one point; formed his judgment of his Lordship's state of mind from the actual examination of his Lordship, coupled wiCh a perusal of the facts contained in the Serious affidavits put him his hands by order of the Lord Chancellor; conceives sanity of mind th be the power of the mind to combine facts and circumstances, sad the ability afterwards to discriminate and draw correct con clusions ; having refrained from examining Lord Portsmouth on particular subjects, thinks himself competent to say positively that Lord Portsmouth's mind is perfectly sound; there is a ma terial distinction between mind and judgment; conceives the mind to be the whole; judgment is one of the properties of the mind ; perception, memory, and instinct, are sonic other of the properties, which are very numeroes. Mr. Commissioner HULLOCK—This is a dissertation, and not an answer. Examination continued—Does not think more frequent op portunitiea of seeing his Lordship would lead hint to a conclusion ' different from that he has now formed. By Mr. G. Barress--Used the letter from the Countess as an introduction to his Lordship. When he first called upon Lord Portsmouth, he tendered the letter—his Lordship re fused to take it, and also to leder witness in his professemel capacity—the second time witness called upon Lord Ports. mouth his Lordship was in a better humour—witness then again tendered the letter. Why did you again offer the letter to his Lordship 7—Because it was addressed to his Lordship; and, as I thought, meant to be forwarded to its destination. Why should I nut? Mr.Commisaioner Ilueresex-That is a question, not an answer. Examination continued.— Witness did not question his Lord ship as to funerals, dung•carts, logs of wood, or any of the other subjects alleged to have been those in reference to which ' Lordship hate .hewn so great eccentricity. His Lordship's con duct in this respect evinced an unsoundness of the judgment, which is the foundation stone of the mind—if the judgment be unsound, the mind cannot be perfectly sound—a sound judgment would draw correct inferences from uhvious facts and discrimi nate between right or wrong; if, not being under the influence of feelings, motives, prejudices, or misrepresentations, a man of his Lordship's iecome should declare his ignorance upon the ex tent of his property, whether it be worth £lOO or £20,000 an nually, should. conceive him to be of unsound mind—he might declare such ignorance, yet not be really uninformed upon the subject; if he really thought as be said, he could not have any mind. His Lordship might wish cunningly to forward the pre sent Commission of Lunacy, and as a motive of policy he might eshibit or wish to exhibit a certain degree of u nsoundness of mind. Again examined by Mr. Tuts.—Cannot swearihat any or all of the persons in lunatic asylums are mad ; cannot say that there may not be some among them acting the lunatic for the purpose of forwarding a particular object or policy ; is not aware of any means of detecting such impositions. By Mr. Beues.—His Lordship is perfectly competent to manage his own affairs and property, if he had an honest steward and an honest banker; he is also competent to select his steward and banker, and afterwards to detect any impro priety in their conduct. Q. Suppose, Sir, a Nobleman is married, his wife makes it a rule of her conduct to carry a horse-whip about her, to keep one in her bed-room, to apply it occasionally by way of chas tisement—she coolly witnesses the daily insult and. ill-treat men; of her husband—she introduces an adulterer into her fa mily—she practices a refinement of cruelty (which I hope is without a parallel) by sending her husband to fetch this adul terer to her bed; and witnesses, nay more, encourages a bar barity of conduct and treatment froM this adulterer to her bus band—suppose this case, and further, that the husband, on nu' one occasion, resists, opposes, or complains, of this depraved and unexampled conduct, what would be your opinion of the competency of this husband to menage e his own affairs, and su perintend the expenditure of his money, and the disposal of his pi nperty e—A. Supposing this case to be possible, which I deny to he either probable or possible, I should say that he was to tally incompetent to superintend any one of the common affairs and transactions of life. Q Suppose this case to be merely hypothetical, apd that it be related by the husband himself to a Jury sworn to try the sanity of his mind—what would then be your opinion of him ? A. I should think such a man very wicked—addicted to false. hood—and who was desirous of getting rid of his wife. Mr. Baucs.—Then I have done. By Mr. Nutt..—Believes his Lordship to be of sound mind, competent to form a correct perception, and to arrive at a pro- bable conclusion ; this wOull be an act of the judgment. Robert Long, an ironmonger and bell-hanger, at Basingstoke, gave evidence ar to his having furnished articles for his Lord ship's house at Hurtsbournc, in 1814, when his Lordship's Con duct was as regular and proper as that of any other Gentleman. Thomas Davidson, a corn-chandler, gave similar testimony.-- His Lordship always made very reasonable remarks on the price of hay and corn. Cross-examined by Mr. Wirrnitazu..—The draft which his Lordship signed was previously filled up by her Ladyship, who gave it to witness to take to Lord Portsmouth for his signature. By Mr. Alss.ustn—When bargaining for thine hay, his Lord ship conversed in as rational a manner as any other Gentleman would have done. Thomas Manchester, examined by Mr. ADAM.—Was a bailiff in his Lordship's employ in October, 11118; was previously in the service of Mr. Hanson, at Raleigh, 14 miles from Hurts bourne--was so from 1803 to 1811 ; Lord Portsmouth was there frequently ; his Lordship often slept there ; he was always very particular as to the corn given to his horses; he was a very good judge of horses and stock in general; he remarked justly upon the quality of the soil and the probable produce of growing crops ; used frequently to inquire the market prices; his Lordship was as well acquainted with farming matters as any other Nobleman or Gentleman. Received the letter (handed to witness) a few days subsequent to its date—the hand-writing is that of Lord Put tsmouth. (Put in and read.) " Edinburgh, Jan. 11,1822. " Mr. Manchester—Mr. /Ream' hath informed me that my farm - has been offered to be let; I desire this may be contra dicted, as I intend to keep it .ir. Jig own possession; I have written to Mr. Skirrow respecting it, and in a few days you will hear from me again.—Your's, &c. " PORTSMOUTH." Cross-examined by Mr. Powsts—l had no reason to believe that Mr. France and another Gentleman were corning to Hurtsbourne before they came. When I went to Whitchurch on the sth October (Wbitchurch is two miles from Huetsbourne, and about three-quarters of a mile from Park-gate) I bad no reason to believe that Lady Portsmouth was there. I know a man trained Lucas, who was with me atWhitchurch. I did not see hien before I went toWhitchurcb ; he lived there. I will not swear that I was not with Win on the 31 of October. James Mullensexamined by Mr.Wt4.ldaus-1 was a boot and shoemaker forty years, in Lung-acre. I worked for Lord Ports mouth five or sax years. I had conversed with him about four times respecting his boots and shoes. Ile gave me directions, and desired they might be pixcle easy across the joints. His Lordship gave directions in the same inautteras other Noblenit usually do. by 9fr.Wsruzaast—Do you think his LOrd ship knows a shoe fronts boot?—I should think - be does. Does he know a thick shoe from , a thin one?—Certainly. Air. Serjeant Pszt.—And, probably, like 11r. Wetherell, he knows where the shoe pinches!—(Laughter). • Mr. Serjeaut PELL said they were about to put in some deeds, which had been executed by Lord Poi tsrnouth ; they would not, however, fatigue the Court by having them read through, but only state the naiKe of the deeds, and the names of the panic% concerned. Mr. France then put in a quantity of deeds; be was exaMiacd by Mr. ADAM.—Tbe fist' document was dated - Feb. 12, 1790, and was a settlement mask I on ihe present Earl. In this document are the names ! of the late Earl, the present Eail tinder the name of, Lord Lymington, Mr. Hanson, Mr. Neville, John . Yougal, the Earl of Powis, WirkEellowes, Esq. and Isthers. The attesting witnesses were dead. Mr.; Fiance stated, that by the deed of 1790. there were ' p. o dons stanch had been paid to the younger branches of the family. 'ln this deed there was also a provi sicm to permit the present Earl to make a settlement on his _marriage. Mr. ADAM stated that Lord Portsmouth had been abioad ;hiee years before the deed , was executes; on that being done, lie went abroad again, By ;he-deed of 1799, a settlement was made upon . Grace Noron on his ntayrisige with her. Mr. FrAnce put in a document, dated 13th Apvih 1793, and the probate of the will, dated the 24th May, 1797. He was about explaining some parts of these documents, when.— Mr.WETHERELL requested to have an abstract, for the purpose of checking them as they were read. Mr. TrtowEn said he would, lend him his abstract, but he would want it returned again to him. Mr. WETHERELL inquired whe i ther there were any deed executed subsequent to the last marriage? Mr. FranCe said he was not aware of ally. Mr. Skirrow had a great many leases Mr. WETHERELL here begged the interference of the Court. Ile said he understood there was a me dical gentleman named Lawrence, who was either on the point of entering the room where Lord Ports mouth was, or bad actually gone into the room. Ile begged the Court would present the medical gentle , man from examinin4 his Lordship; and he considered the step as a highly improper one. Mr Serjeant Hou.octt said something ought to be done to prevent the aamission of a medical gentleman Mr. Wit.i.tams said .his Learned Friends, Mr.Ser• jeant Pell and Mr. Adam, had just gone out for the purpose 'of seeing his Lordship previous to the Com missioners and the Jury visiting him ; and it would have been better had the Counsel on the other side ascertained whether Mr. Lawrence was or was not about visiting the Noble Lord, before an application had been made to the Court. .. Mr: WETHERELL said it was more regular to apply for an order et prevention. Mr. Pam said, whatever might be the object of theorisit, at least he should very much wish to see the Counsel who represented Lord Portsmouth, to ask them what was intended by a medical gentleman being in attendance. Surely if the mind of his Lord ship was not to be acted upon, it would be much.bet ter to see him in such a state as he presented, without anything being infused into his mind, or without. any preparation to come before the Jury—(Applause from the Jury). Mr. WILLIAMS observed that he knew his Learned Friends, Mr.. Serjeant Pell and Mr. Adam, were in capable of doing anything improper in the slightest degree, and he was truly surprised to hear Mr.l'epys throw out the insinuations he had respecting them ;, he thought more delicacy and more kindness ought 'to have been exercised. His Learned Friends could not be ignorant of the way.in which Lord pea - tinsmith had been visited. It was .by his Loedship express desire Mr. Coombe had made** appointment, and it was by this desire that the Learned Geatleasto bad attended. Mr. Serjeant HULLOCK remarked that Mr. Law rence must not be permitted to see his Lordship. Mr. Wane said he was quite Satisfied the Lord Chancellor had made no order 'to prOent.a Medical Gentleman from attending Lord Portsmouth. But he complained that upon this occasion as well as every other connected with this inquiry, as far as re garded Lord Portsmouth, the Counsel engaged for him, had 'peen ill-used, and there had been a decided combination to prevent access - to him from the begin ning to the end of the proceedings. Mr. Serjeant Pellavas yesterday desirous of seeing his Lordship and 'communicated that desire to the Gentlemen around him; something happened,' as something always has happened, to prevent his being seen; and Mr. Serjeant Pell was told he had better see him today. It had just been stated, that it .would be better to see his Lordship without his having any communication with others who were strangers to him, and this ap peal was answered from the Jury. This was not the first time that cheers had struck dismay in the Counsel of Lord Portsmouth. He (Mr. Wilde) had felt most deeply on this occasion, and he did not know what the Learned Counsel on the other side thought, but he shoeld have imagined that Mr. Setjeant Pen and Mr. Adam ought to have credit, that they were not attending Lord Portsmouth for any improper pur pose. Without entering into a discussion on the five minutes late interview that they had been permitted to be in his Lordship's society, without at all spe culating upon the object of it, he trusted that at least his Learned Friend might be heard before an order was made by the Court against the introduction of any one into his Lordship's presence. Sir THOMAS BARING said, he could not allow an in sinuation reflecting on the conduct of the Jury to pass .without m..king a few observations. For his own part, it had been his anxious endeavour to ascertain the truth, in- the investigation' upon which they had, Assembled, and he felt persuaded he should return a xonscientious verdict. He believed the Learned Ser jeant (Pell) was quite incapable of any dishonourable action. • Upon the previous examination of Lord Portsmouth, the Learned •Serjeant had sat immedi ately next him, and when a question seas asked his Lordship, it had been remarked, !tat heOccasionally turned his eyes towards the Learned Gentleman, as though' he was desirous of learning how to ansvierit. The Learned Set-jean - es countenance sometinies ex pressed assent; and he oCcaiionalli. had nodded, is though he signified his - approbation. After some conversation bettlfelMthC COURT, Mr. WETHERELL, and Mr. Pam, Mr. Serjeant Pio.r. returned and addressed the Cominissioners.- - He said, that asthis-siould be most' probably the last time he shOuld have the honour of addressing the Court, he begged leave to be heard patiently. On his entering the room he had heard his name mentioned in a very loud way by various Gentlemen.• Helearnt, when in an adjoining room, hom a Gentleman whom he really did not, know, who brought *message signifying than a sharp attaek hard been made - upon him (Mr. Serj eant Pell). He 'felt lie was in England; and: vat , Englids Court of ,justice, and there .wes et,* feeling upon which Englishmen agreed, it waS--" Let uo man attack itaotheria ldis absence." If he could not answer k when he appeared, he ought to be censured, pro vided his conduct was deserving of censure. What ever expressions might have been used with respect to himself be did not know, and he must be per mitted to say, he did not care. This he would say, that whatever s as the charge, it was a false one.— But if it was indecorous in his Learned Friends to bring accusations against him its his ab , ence, it surely was not less ungenerous. His Learned Friends who were near him were much younger than himself, . and when they met with the reward which equalled their merits, they would reap much ; but they would learn that it was better not to attack a man in his labsence.. He would now shortly state the facts that bad transpired.. They had been done by the conetir ranee of his Learned Friends. It had been their de sire that ,a gentleman named Lawrence should have an opportunity of seeing Lord Portsmouth. This gentleman was a man of eminence, and required no panegyric from him; his fame • hail already been blazoned abroad. They were anxious that a gentleman of so much medical celebrity should have an oppor tunity of seeing his Lordship, and they intended to call him as a witness on this occasion. Mr. Law rence had attended this morning, agreeably to their request; and the interview they had sought to obtain had not been accomplished. It had been his (Serjeant Pell's) whit that Mr. Lawrence should see Lord Portsmouth, in the presence of Mr. Adam, Mr. Coombe, anTlairnself; they were pro. ceeding together, when an intimation was given to Mr. Lawrence that he should remain in the robiog mom until we had seen Lord Portsmouth. Mr.. Coombe mentioned something about Mr. Lawrencc'l presence, to which he (the Learned Serjeant) replied. This much he said to the Commissioners and Jury, that Mr. Lawrence had not seen Lord Portsmouth ; he had not attempted to see him ; and that lievuld not see him, after what had fallen from the Mrt. Having stated thus much respecting this fact, fie called upon Mr. Adam to vouch for the truth of it. It could not, he observed, be denied that there were certain parts of his own character which, if examined with a scrutinizing eye, might perhaps appear ble mishes, but he felt the charge that had been made upon him was groundless. He felt himself ca pable of shaking the dew-drop from the lion's mane. lie knew he was competent to disperse any imputation that was endeavoured to be cast upon him. He had heard, with some surprise, a circumstance had been related by one of the Jury, that Lord Portsmouth had looked at him for assent,when under examination in the private room. It would be recollected that the Court had granted permission for him to be seated near his Lordship, and Mr. Coombe was stationed on the other side. It arpeared his Lordship had (accord ing to the account of Sir Thomas Baring), from time to time, looked at him, an.] that he had expressed in his (Serjeant Pell's) countenance, assent to what the Noble Lord had said— " This was the head and (rent of his offending." He begged leave to say that he wanted no man, how *cver high his rank, to teach hi rn.his dirty. He should perforni his duty, and the Public would not think the worse of him for that performance. On Lord kortsmouth's right hand sat himself, and on his left *et Mr. Ccombe. One of the Jury here remarked that Mr. Coombe did not sit on the left hand, but behind his Lordship. .At this moment Sir Thomas Bating rose, and begged to say that he never entertained the slightest option that the Learned Serjeant had used any means wha:ever to induce the Noble Earl to give an r.n swer to any question that was put to him. But he begged permission . to state, that it was apparent to every one that the Leaned Serjeant had nodded assent. Mr. Serjeant Prt.t. appealed to all who were pre sent at that investigation, if his Lordship did not turn round from time to time, and look like a man in distress; fie seemed anxious in that trying moment of difficulty to seek for shelter. Good GOD, to what a point had he to speak! It was no pleasant thing for any man, even should his mind be as strong as the body of Hercules, to be surrounded by a number of gentlemen, some of whom he knew, others- to whom he was an entire stranger, and to be questioned on such subjects! The Learned Serjeant said, he did not want to appeal ad homines; but he could not tell what would be his own feelings were he placed in such a situation. Was there anything, therefore, so unpardonable when this unhappy man, shipwrecked as it were, turned round with an anxious look, and when he caught, the eye of his friend (for friend he was) seeking refuge there? But such offence should not again be given. If Lord 'Portsmouth 'turned round and sought by a glance protection, he would cover' bit face lest he should offend anybody— (Great applause). • . - Theejmastsstoxitas expressed indignation that the Court shoirld'he So interrupted. Mr Sei - jeatit Pst.t..-1 have said that I was in an English Coon of Justice—this improper, but very natural expression of feeling, convinces me that I was not mistaken ; my Lord Portsmouth is here to-day at his own request ; I wish to ask some questions ; the Gentlemen on the other side will have the - liberty of doing the same; if there be no rule against it, appealing to your experience for a decision, we propose doing this, and ' the Gentlemen of the Jury will then procee d to question his Lordship severally ; we have finished our case, and I am heartily glad that we have, for it has been a most painful task to nU who have ap peared on behalf of the unfortunate Lord . PortsmOrztli: It is the first time I have been engaged'in so painful a proceeding, and' Ido assure - you it shall be the la.r„ In conclusion, I hate only to say this• that ;CI had no other prOpetty to leave my children, I *ill leave .them for alzgacy the charaeter of a father who has always faithfully:dischafged the duties of his station and that :An, in my eitimraitit, tie the nrosr valuable legacy I could leave - thettf-:-(4ipltiuse).—The•case was now yith the Court, with the Gentlemen of the Jury, and Mr. Adam. Mr. ADAM was about addressing the .Court •on what had fallen during his absence, When ' - Mr. Parrs begged ptrmission to state that he clk. avowed having imputed the slightest blame with re -1 spect . to the conduct of the two learned Gentlemen whose names had been mentioned; if zany words had been used to that effect; he was not ms-are of theta, and he begged teai'eto recall thern.---: Mr. ADAM ADAM said be was -satisfied, and tie was also [ aiiili 'Wised by hi V Learned Pridnetto OOZY Vrat the apology,was received. 'lle - feh'ii,tdijusiiditditY; I amt ` resPect to Mr. Lawieno, that if -2t tr . •• -