Star. — London, England, 1817-04-28 00:00:00

LAN INTELLIOENCE; COVET OF CHANCERY, APRIL 26. Cowes Col.Litoi, nxrono, v. STU MONS. The minus of this case are these s—ln 1799 Christ's college possessed the Rectory of Faversham, and wished to sell it; Mr. Simmons, who then farmed it, offered to become the purchaser. A Mr. DAvies,, since dead, was appointed to survey the grounds, and form an estimate of their value. Both the College and Mr. Symmons adopted Mr. Davies's estimate in the respective statements they gave in to the Com missioners who were to determine the price of the Rectory. The estimate ',lamed the annual rent in 1799 to be at4O9 ; and thirpurchase was effected epee this assumption. in 18f4 the• College filed a bill in Chancery against Symmdns, in order to have the sale reduced, on the ground that , Syitimoni had defrauded and deceived the Commissioners as to the value of the Rectory; application was now made to the Court for leave to mend the bill, by recording certain pa pers, which Mr. Simmons had transmitted to his Solicitor, Mr. Morrell: _ _ Mr. Bay., on the part of the plaintiff, stated, that the papers he applied now to have recorded were in - the hand-writing of Mr. Symmons, and represented the value of the lands at a rate far short of their real value, and were therefore of importance to the final issue of the question, as tending to prove an intention on the part of Symmons to deceive. Sir - Samuel. Roartux,for the defendant, maintained that such an application was altogether irregular ; that nothing was more clearly established, than that no amendment of a bill could be admitted after three terms had elapsed from the filing of a bill, and an application had been made to expedite the procesr; that, if any new matter really was discovered, the only mode of proceeding was by withdrawing the bill and filing a new one, or by a supplementary bill; but in the present case he had to complain of want of candour on the other side, for the papers now in, question were partly copies of documents which• Mr. Symmons had received from the College in 1813, a whole year before the bill was filed, and which could not therefore be unknown to the plaintiff when the - bill was filed; and partly Mr. Symmons's remarks upon these documents to his solicitor, Mr. Morrell, who happened likewise to be solicitor for the plaintiff; and these last Mr. Morrell had no right to deliver to the plaintiff, and the , plaintiff no right to use, since DO order of Court to that effect was ever obtained. Mr. beyt hoped, though h might cornnut some Mistakes in his professional proceedMgs, that Sir tia inuel would give him credit foe acting honourably in private life, as he was ready to give the highest cre • dit to Sir Samuel in this respect, however severely he might chastise him (Mr. Bell). As to 'the practice of that Court, he contended that in the course of So years, during which he had practised in the Court, he observed considerable changes in this matter. The changes wire beneficial, but the present application was warranted by the late practice of the Court. - Sir SAMUEL &MILLI( would be obliged to the Learned Gentleman if he made some use of his cz- parience, by referring to similar , applications that had been received. Mr. BELL challenged Sir Samuel to refer to. a case. in which such application was refused. • ' Sir firatvat..—Certainly I cannot ; but it is because no man bad ever the modesty to make a similar apillication. l'lse LORD CHANCELLOR, in consequence of the different opinions advanced as to the practice of the Court, would take till Tuesday to consider of it. His Lordship observed upon the merits of the case generally ; that fraud and deceit were most unfair• raoUbly imputed to Mr. Syrnmons, for that he and the College acted upon exactly the same estimate ; sad that, though gross neglect must be ascribed to the College, the neglect was' on both sides tree from trotd, or any intention to deceive. The Surveyor was employed by the College; and it could not be believed that Mr. Symnsons had made him an bistro- Mont of deceiving the Comsniuiosers, merely because be had invited bins is live in his house WWl* he sur veyed the lands, and because ba bad invited him to bang his lady with him. At the same time it appears that Davies never did in fact survey the lands, but looked round them, and, consequently, represented the extent much less than the truth : the estimate was, in consequence, below the real value of the-lands: this was, therefore, a fair question in equity. Sir Santee' might think him partial to Christ's College, Oxford p but be would really say, as a thing of in sce to the public, that Surveyors employed by es and Clergymen seldom did their duty. He decide on she present application neat Tuesday. COURT OF =Clint/ER. APRIL IR iitiVIINS W. ALDRIDOS." • Mr. DATMCZY moved for a ruli to shew cause, "why the lrerdiet enured for the defendant in this ease pluisid sit be set aside, and a new trial had.. The teetjsM irisiiied before Mr. Justice Parlr, at Reading, Sof was brought by the plaintiff, who-is the farmer of the tidiete if a particular paid), against the defers. dant, who holds premises in the said parish,: to re civet the valcat'a certain tithes of hay and clover, Which he had neOitted. to set out. The 'action was brought under tM statute of Edward, and it was clearly proved that the defendant had cut and car. 110 0. ried away three fields of duvet and hay without allotting any tithes whatever. Upon the p art of the .definulant, for whom no witnesses were ca lled, an in. genius' appeal wits made to the Jury by his Counsel Mr. Jervis), on the hardship of his being forced to • pay this demand for tithes, when the other bliedeos which he kid to bear, in the way of taxation and otherwlie, Mere so grekst ; and it was contended by hien, that the clam and grass in question, was cut alone for the use of the defeodistas own hones - which were used on the farm, and of consequence was not liable to pay tithes. In answer to this, however, it was clearly proved, that the defendant's horses were, sot comes 'employed to diiinv barges up the river, Nei that intact pan of the hay and clover had been • soak carried to the market aad sold. ." Leaned Amos clearly expounded the law on *".• thlitnbject s but the Jury, influenced by . the address aide to their feelings, footed a verdict in direct op - position to his Lotdship'e 'diarge.—Role to thew cause Greeted. • , CONSISTOnT COURT; DOCTORS' CoSOIONS. 'LADY XIIIKVIALL. 11. &ORD steawmat,. TM; was a question as to the ischnieeilidity of a • libel peered on the pall, of Lady Kirkwall, is a cause, of divorce, instituted by her Ladyship against Lord Kirkwall, by reason of alleged. adultery, The libel pleaded, that Lord and Lady Kirkwall were married by special licence in August 1802, at Abergelly, in Denbighshire; that they lived toge- I they from that time until the year 1809, and had two 'children. A separation then took place, in conse quence of some unhappy differences which had arisen between them, and her Ladyship has since resided in various places at the Wect-end of the town, apart from his Lordship. The libellarther pleaded, that in the beginning of the year 1814, Lord Kirkwall formed a criminal intercourse with a woman of the name of Taylor, or Hankin, who lived in lodgings in Park-place, Grosvenor-square; and that he from' chat time became in the habit of visiting her therefor criminal purposes. The libel then charged various acts of adultery to have been committed by them at those and other lodgings ; and farther pleaded, that his Lordship, about the same time, formed a similar I ccnnection with a married woman of the name of Webb, then residing with her husband; that he after wards lived with her in various lodgings, and still continues to do so at lodgings in Margaret-street, Cavendish square ; and it charged adultery between them at all those places. After hearing Dr. Arnold and Dr. Burnaby in opposition to the admissibility of the libel, and Dr. Swaby and Dr. Lushington in reply, Sir Wu. SCOTT stated the facts pleaded, and ad mitted the libel to proofs' COURT OP KING'S BENCH, APRIL 11. KIIIIR O WILLAN. This was a ease regarding the liability of a corn mon•carrier, and it was tried before Lord nails°. rough at the last Guildhall Sittings, when * verdict was found for the plaintiff. The action was for the loss of some black cloth, which the defendant, pro prietor of the Bull-and-mouth undertook to convey from London to Dumfries. The value of it exceeded five pounds, and it was proved, on the part of the defendant, that the usual notice, stating that be would not be answerable for parcels above the.value of £5, unless They were entered and paid for accord ingly, was posted is his coach-office. On behalf of the plaintiff, however, it appeared that the porter employed by him to carry the cloth could not read, and the defendant's clerk did not inform him of the notice. Lord Ellenborough left it to the Jury to decide, whether it was to be presumed that the plain tiff had knowledge of the existence of such a notice, and 0i ...hound the negative. A verdict was therefore entered in his favour. . The Arroann-Gettnat moved for a rule lrui to set it aside, observing upon the great importance of the question t be contended thlsk. under the circum stances, it was impossible that the plaintiff should not have known of the notice : the porter aware that there was a large board in the defendant's coach-, office, but, as be could not read, be could not swear to its contents. Ail the defendant was bound to do,' was to give the public means of knowledge, and if a party sent an ignorant porter, he must take the con sequences l a tact who intended a fraud upon the carrier would o thy in future have to advertise for a porter who could not read. Lord ELMO:SWIM:OW—Though the porter could not read, be could hear, and you might have inform ed lira of the contents of the board. The Arroarrag•Gensaan replied, that a frando km man must then in future require that his porter should have two qualifications, ignorance and deaf ness. Hg argued confidently that the defendant had done all that the law required. Lord ELLIUMItOUGH.--If a man sent a porter with a parcel who was deaf, and could not read, fraud ought to be supposed, and he (light to be corned out of the coach-office : this case only gives one farther proof of the difficulty of straggling against - the wise provisions of the common law, In restricting the liability of commonAlarriers 1 if there be a special contract, it must be clearly proved, and then vaunt krt. It would cure all, if, when a porter delivers a parcel, a receipt were given him, on which the notice of restricted Lability was printed. The Arroarrel-Ozutnat. observed, that in the bustle of business it would sometimes be impossible to give receipts, And then the difficulty would still remain to show Oat that receipt had been read by the party. Mr. Justice would be sufficient to prove that the receipt had been given c not in the particular case, bat that it was the constant prac tice of the office. • Mr. Justice Annov.—And atelawr good mese quince of a receipt would be, that the owner of the goods might have the means of knowing that they had been delbered by his servant. Lord Euammeoucus.—.ll thenhieetion be, that there is soeb a besde of liminess, it only comes to this...tbat they most get through it less in a burry. --Role Refused. *IIOIINT's CANAL COMPANY.' In Lb. case ef the Itesenes Canal Company. WAARIN applied to NI aside the 00115Vit, and tp ob tun a new Mud, but the Court refused the application. LOAD ALVIALO V. aaanenn. This was =section of trespass, tried before Mr. Justice Aanorr, at the last Dorchester Auizes, when a verdict was found for the plaintifE The declara tion alleged that the defendant had broke and entered the Manor of Cranbourne, situate in the parish of. Henley, with dogs, axe. and unlawfully chased, wenn , dad, and kilkd the plaintiff's deer. The 2d count omitted the averment of kill'ng the deer, and the 3d charged that the defendant had carried away, and ' converted to his own use, the goods and chattels of, the plaintiff—to wit, bucks and - does. The defendant pleaded the general issue, and en ancient custom. ,l U ying the trespass, but which cu s t om was not proed. Mr. Cessna now moved to enter a nonunit. • He admitted that the plaintiff was Lord of the Manor of Cranbourne, and that Hunley was situate within that Manor = but he denied that the plaintiff bad any pro perty in that neighbourhood. The ground of bit present motion was, that as the verdict was taken upon the third count, which alleged that the deer taken and carried away by the defendant was tha property of the plaintiff, it was impossible for that count to be sustained, because, in punt of law,- the plaintiff could not, as Lord of the Manor, h ave any in property deer, or other animals of that description, which were/wa war& For this he cited Swain'. Case, 7 Co:"17. b. a mid- he argued, that althorns)) tbs Pheimeg hid PalaMtraiimiteivilitii•ja the deer, yet he had not such a property in them as mord give bins a right of action, because the only property be had in them was derived entitely from the place in which they were found. Mr. Justice BAILZY, however, referred to a case in 1 William Blackstone's Reports, 1151, and another in Salkeld, where it had been held that trespass would lie for entering the plaintiff's rabbit warren. and taking and carrying away the rabits ; for he had such a property in them, as gave him a right of action. Mr. Justice HOLROTD said, that this was also the case with respect to.fisheries ; and he referred to a case in Cro. Charles, and to another in Lord Ray mond, which %seat still farther ; and decided that the plaintiff had such a property in deer and other game, as entitled I►im to call them :up:. Mr. CASISERD then submitted that on the count upuo which the plaintiff had recovered, charged first, that the defendant had broken and entered the close; and, secondly, that he took and carried away the deer in question. The whole count must be taken to• gether ; and if so, the latter part of the count could not be maintained consistently with the action for trespass. For he submitted that an action for tees• pass would not lie in this case, inasmuch as the Lard had no property beyond the mere franchise of the char.. The COURT, utter these eases had been cited, de. cided that the owner of a chase or free warren, had , a property in the game contained i.i it —that the mere act of entering the chase, even though no game were taken, was inprinus to the owner—because, it often repeated, it would seem that the trespasser had a concurrent right with the owner to hunt there— and, finally declared that, after the practice which had obtained in pleading upon this subject, it was now dangerous to raise the question; and therefore the Rule must be refused.—Rule refused. OLD BAILEY. Saturday Thema ;rder: was indicted for stealing a square lace veil from the person of Ann Coleman. The prosecutrix deposed that she was passing the top of Charles.street, City Road, when the prisoner snatched the veil from her bonnet—be was stopped ' with the property—Guilty. George Crew, Jobs Gorse', and Was. Greenwood, were indicted for stealing 601bs. weight of silk, value £l5O, the property of Isabella and Francis Desanges, of Spafields. Crew and Gurney were found Guilty, and Was. Greenwood -was acquitted. The following were aseleted of felonies, viz.-1. Oliver, for stealing a teakettle and candlestick; B. Jones, for stealing three pair of trowsers Ana ;minim, for stealing aillver watch and a Ai rate; S. Dynes, for stealing an oak plank ; It. Carpenter, for stealing a copper, Ike. Value 110 s. ; J. Cbesbunt, for stealing 24 panes of glass • B. Beatoog, for stealing handkerelikf; I. R. Yeoman, for ste aling a qv* ; Mary Taylor, for sWalkg a sliver watch, a emr, ate. I. Roberts, for stealing a band-saw, Re. ; W. I Ross, for staling tour glass cruets. with sliver tops ; Joseph Nash , fur stealing four Inaba' of barley meal and one sack; and J. Rift, for stsaUng a nsanotandost book sad a silk beaker. etileE—The following were acquitted, Mu. Joseph Bell, G. Hall, 1 B. Cosgrove, B. Conolly; Mary l.onsaz, C. Smith, C. TitisirtU, G. Steward; W. Thompson, J.TII , J. Robinson, Markus Jones, W. Smith, G. Nash, and P. u.- 0/won, who was tried and .cquitted at Bristol As. sizes, has, for the last seven years. been the terror ofl all Bristol, Gloucestershire, and Somersetshire : he has organised and trained a desperate gang, to assist him in every act of infamy and delinquency ; and although he has bees often tried, he has invariably been acquitted upon some legal or technical infer. mality. His boast Is, that he will not be hung until he arrives at the age of forty. On the nightlefore , his trial he published the following couplet : • Ornery Greve, has nothing to her 44 From Bocabaset or Konsrame Upon being questioned some time since about the distress of the times, he observed...." Ah s they are' very great ; I have dipped into a hundred and fifty farmers' pockets and have not found a shilling." Previous to Grootr's trial, Joke Jaime was ca. pitally convicted of a burglary, and stealing 350 yards of woollen cloth, ana a man of the name of Tensor was also found guilty of receiving the same. Twelve witnesses were called to prove the guilt of the prisoners—one of these, Mary Cribb, a woman who cohabited with Groves, was cross-examined by Mr. Serjeant PALL, when she made a confession to the following effect Mary Cribb—" I live with Mr. Groves.i. • Mr. Serjeant Pati.—N Who is Mr. Groves t"--A, I believe he gets his living by picking pockets." s er i es/ a pa L s,...ie And how do you get your living?"-A. " By travelling with him and his wife." Serjeant PaLs.- 44 How long have you got your living by accompanying. n ickpockets I be lieve about two years. As Mr. Johnson, of Paddington, was toming along the Kent-road on Friday night, about eight o'clock, he was stopped by two men, who presented a pistol at his breast, and demanded his money ; this Mr. Johnson refused to comply with, and a desperate scuffle ensued, during which the pistol went off, and wounded OM of the villains in the arm j the ruffians at last :unneeded in overpowering Mr. Johnson, and robbing him of £lO in Bank of England notes, and some Aver ' with his silk handkerchief an d g l ove') with which t hey made off towards Lond on . _ _ Friday night the house of Mr. Burgin:, of James street, Christchurch, was entered at the back (by means of - wrenching . off the locks). and robb e d o f a new copper, a large haunch of mutton, and several other articles. Thursday evening, as Mr. Nelson, of th e Edin burgh Cas, near Farnbridge Wharf, was returning from the London Tavern, be was robbed of great part of his clothes, with his watch and appendages, in Wellclose-square. On the same evening the cabin of the ship Nancy, lyirg in . the River, was broke open, and robbed of a gold watch and appendages, and a Bank of Englind note of five pounds. Bow-arsterr-On Satprday Masai Fuller alias Sharp, underwent an rumination, charged with horse stealing. He was committed for further examination. Gtauswasr.•—Saturday two young men of respec tabilit* were charged with stealing from the stand at Blackfriars, a. hackney-coach, together with horses, harness, Ike. The prisoners pleaded intoalcation, and the Magistrate being of opinion that no theft was in tended, they were merely fused for the misdemeanor Ind ordered to pay erpences, which, however, amount. ing to wpwards of 60s. the genilensep paid rather reluctantly, considering that their folic was nwifeest pensive than Qat times would admit. They were of muse discharged. - ' • ,1 CLERICAL lATELLICRECI. CAMBRIDGE, APRIL VI. The following Gentlemen were oa Friday last admitted under-mentioned degrees. MASTERS OP ARTS. The Rev. John Tlininai Hourlcy, of rinhy College, Rev. Charier Muegr v, Fclibw of l'tlna). College. SACIIILORS Or Ari,. The Rev. Rober Tritton, of St. John's College. Charles Francis Wyatt, Jest., College. OIFORD, AMU. 26. The Vice-Chancellor's [lilac Premium fur Latin for the present year, in Trinity College, Dublin, has h e i ii judged to R.'!'. Pore, Erg Student of that University. 'Tuesday, the Rev. Charles Abel Morley, M.A. of CIA* Church, was elected Canon liampton's Lecturer before t. c versity, at St. Mary's, for the next year. 'I he same day Mr. Robert Dalzell Thomson, was Fellow of New College. Last week, the Rev. Daniel Rice Codfrej. M.A. of Qat*, College, was presented to the perpetual curacy of White•Culir, Erste, void by the death of the Rev. Mr. Hume. 'I hurselay the followi g G-ntlensen were admitted to dor m kAct:rt.ott 174 CM/. LAW. Mr. James Traill, of Bat,iol College. MASTERS Of ARTS. Mr. Christopher Cleobor, y. of Pembroke College. Rev. John Hate, of Bratentrose College. Rev. John Harman, of Merton College. ISAVOLLORS or ARTS. Mr. Robert Hayne Seale, of Teeter College. Mr. George Henry Harker, of Haver College. Mr. John Kral big ng. of NI. John's Caro. ILLVI.II3I,V.TICAL PKOMOTI. KS. Rev. Wm. Molesworth, M.A. Chaplam tothe Marqsis sl Exeter, Is presentwl to the Rectory 01 M. EMI), Cria w .t.,. Rev. C. R. Ashhad, is eected Master of the Gra at Aylesbury. The Dowager Lady Brownlow has appointed the • , r rt , Moore, Recta of Alt saints and sc. Lawr.nce, to be one of key La3rhip's Domestic Chaplains. Monday, the Rev Ircarod ls Loa, of Eecleshsli. wag a/1 ,4 to the Perpetual Curacy 01 Gowan, in Staffordshire, void L) death of the Rev. Wat. Lowe. RUPTURRD PATICNTS, MCNItIF, and Co. of Charlotte Horse, opposite the Rev. Roy. land Hill's Chapel, have established a Medical Board in woodstoct •street, Oxford -street, adjoiuing New Bond where a Physic an arid surg.-un, Psfetns.. re of the Royal Col, I.ontl , in, of thirty- rat.; experience, reside, and where al the Members of the Board alternately attend. 'that thousands love been restored to health by them, wlt.tout confittem .nt, iLa disputable, after bovitals had lat!ed. Eruptions on the Led, face, and body, ulc.:reed throat, Ste Sic. are the cqnse penes el a certain complaint itoproperiy tr. it:ed.—Messrs. Coop; Munroe, and Co. are cotioul•ed daily, at bob houses, un it Ng./ at night.—There are side doors at each house, and private motto for (marg.—Advice gratis, at Charlotte House, Bl•c;frisit, Tuestliy, Thursday, and Sunday ; and at Woodetoisk Howe, Monday, Wednesday, Friday,and Sunday ',until Twulve o'clock. The Ales and Fi,tula cored without cottlng Rep. tined Patients attend at Charlotte Howe on Mondays mid Fri days, and at Woodstock lissise on Wednesdays, who are rail. tally cured of reducible Ruptures on scientific and suatoto!cal principles, without surgical operation or the least exeorLtiou. BIRTHS. Ap;II 17, at Oxide, in France, the Lady of Coto .:el Halkett, C.B. of a daughter. Thursday, the Lady of Sir P. B. V. Broke, Bart. at Broke-Mk, of a daughter. April &T, in Edinburgh, Mrs. Capt. Barclay, R.N. of & daughter April 13, at Bakhayosk, the /-ady of Alum Ferguaon, of Woodhill, Advocate, Edinburgb,of a son. At Tyrl.b House, Rots•shlre, upon the 29th tth. the Lady of Captain thongs Munro, of the 4,44 Regiment, or Royal H. landau, of a daughter. Sunday se'nnight, at the Patronage, 111aanlogford Wilts, the Lady of the Rer. Frauds B. Astley, of a son. MARRIED. Mondry, Captain Thomas Coe, R. 1 ,1 only son of Mr. Alder man h ., Cot., to Martha-Anne, eldest daughter of M r . R. Wh ee l er, et Camdge. Friday," St. George's, Hanover.sqvare, the Rev. Chas.Jerels, MA Rector of Luddenham, Kent, to Maria, sewed ilaugh:ct of the late Richard Grape, Esq. of Eton, Bucks. Rev. John Loom of Coddenham, Suffolk, to Prances OA daughter of the late Colonel Ward. ICey. 3. Dews., of Parwich, near stillborn', to Mary, oely daughter of the late R. Simpson, Esq. of Derby. Rev. Isaac Denton, Vicar of Wingrave, Bucks, to Miss ßty, daughter of Mr. J. Kay, of Wigton, Cumberland. Res. Jushua Ruddoek, late of Fulham Park, to Miss Elam' Ballandoe, of Kensington. Tuesday, at Worcester, aged the Rev. John Wall, M.A. Rector of Stoke St. MlthOrungh and Qom, is Salop, and Chq. lain in Ordinary to his Royal Highness the Prince Regent. Rev. Mr. Burton, Rector of Biatherwycle. At Rath, after a lingering illness, the Rev. Wm. R owe , tut d Weymouth. At Lilt, she shire of Angus, in Scotland, on the 19:hiamst, the Rev. Thomas Constable. Sunday sennight, at Chatham, of a consumption, Celood Mitchell, of the sift Light infantry Regiment. April 16, at Deckle:id, near flossier., Charles F. Cordov; late surgeon of tbaßoyal Hospital, Hasler, aged 105. Thursday senaight, In Hans-place, Captain Richard Therms Smith, late Master•Attentilant at Java, aged 27. Friday se'nnight, u Wrotbam, Anthony Maeltmeor, jun. Eq. aged 46, lately returned from the East Indies, after residing there upwards of 20 years. Last week.** Brampton, A. Sutherland, late Scrjeant Major of the Royal Artillery Drivers, aged 36. April 11, at Lynsted, Lieutenant Wil/lam Robinson, of the Royal Navy, aged AtHauf, James Bartlet, Esq. aged 79, formerly Lieutemut- Colonel of the Banffshire Local Liir . DIVIDENDS. May 19, J.. Rory, Kinfare, Staffordshire, butcher. May 1.f., J. Graham, Maddox.street, Hanover-square , tailor. May is, W. Elgar, Mahhitone, grocer. May 13 , 1. Wright,W King-street, Cheapside, warehouseman. May 13, K. St. Barbe, Rarcliff, gip chandler. May 13, S. P. Seager, Maidstone, dealer. June-tI, E. Isaac, Quedalquars, Bloinusbnry, wine-merchant. May 13, J. Dean, Cripton, linen-draper. May 10, W. J. Edwards, Re. therhlthe, pawnbroker. May 5, G. and C. Cries, Tower.stree, brokers. May 14, T. Tanner, Gloucester, builder. May IS, R. Green and W. Crabb, lisle-street, Letcester.square, saddlen.— May is, T. Wood, 'Frowbrulite, dodder. May 13, K. Son Preston, Lancashire, builder. May 13, A. Brooksbank and 1 Moody, Long-lane, Bermondsey, tanners. May 13, li. Lark and J. Woudbead i Essex-street, Strand, navy agents. May 12, W. Ashley. Goma street, lacetnan. May IS, J. Pearson, Est , cheap, wine-nerchant. May 13, F. Pothonier, Corporation•row, Clerkenwell, distiller. May 13, B. Tyler, Woodford, innkeeper. May 19, T. Vernon, Walcot, Bath, picture. dealer. May 1.. n, .... Harrison, York, rope -maker. May Li, T. D. Pinnoek, Win. cheater, woolstapler. May 10, J. Startin, Bi rm i ng h am , w ine. IllareblIt• May 13, W. (Jewell, Angel court, Thr,,gniortun street, merchant. April 89, F. Judin, Hatton-garden, wine me. chant. May 96,7. Tucker, Bath, coal-merchant. May 25, P. How, J. Younger, and J. Wilkinson, Whitehav e n, m e rchaere.—. May 15, J. Har ley, Clifton, Glouctstenibire, merclant. May 19, R. Mawnsan, Beverley, Yorkshire, grocer. May is, 7 Crowley, St. linses's.street. tavern-keeper. May 30, H. and C. Rugg, Austinfriars, ailkmen. May 17, C. Cobham. Judd.strte. lir unswkk-sluare ' musical-instrument vender. May 31, M. and S. W. Woodward, Bankside, timber merchants. May 37. J• Cooke, Lower Brook-street, Grey/roar-square, upholsterer.-- May 87, D. Phillips, T.l.Vray, and ti. Baker, York, merchars. PRICE OF STOCKS ON SATURDAY. Beak Stock, 254 431 Imp. 3 per Cent.— Over 44. Red. 7i 1 ff Nita Stock Sri-fit. Cons. 72 71/ 7ta I India Roods 74 73 pr 4 piit ent. oSigi Each. Bilk (24. L) II 13pr. i pa , C. Navy instil* Coos. for Ace. 7311. Mt. Loci Antis. in 7-16 f 7 -16th Lottery Ticket, .4 ill ill& 111414 WA lig To AIURROW AT LONDON BRIDGE Morning - - - 19 nun. ez.t II Alt moon - - • 48 ... . 11: --..._--- , LX)I4LR.)I4 ; rrinwl and published by Lzvcs. ggliT, l'.4:t:- I'lacc, 'loniple-lias. 72. haled to ti ,Hog e . 2e• has b e i t , sty. A. of Mess shwa c. e uss. was 3. Of Qum'. ml to &r t .. ; e Marquis sf 1 , a s r to .1 I void L) 2, &femme, key. !too. o )C"Y o riß u ll ; ne A r l e l dt : l N SteiC l : . :r r eit e dic al Board leonnl le warn. C'l oiler, private room r, lil.c;friar; nS Rep. who are ndi. at Broksha3, of &daughter Fergusson, of It. the Lady of Roy al Ho. ford dbys.% son. af NTr. Alder- Whalier, r. Clan. Jervis, P:cdelsA,6 ti 161 thA a Mary, ally to Miss Min Elena Wall, M.A. is, and Clui. Regent. 'Rowe, late rt 19:11 taunt, stloa, Coked Cordon; Esq. IS. :bard Thew war, Jon. Esq. residing there erjeaat Major inson, of the y Llentenut- cr. May Ir, or. May is, t, Kinir-stoat, Rweliff, June-at, sit. May 11, idwards, Rs- rOWer•Strer, May IS, R. e. eaddlers•-•• H. don +bank and I 13, Li. Lark is. May If, 'carton, Ear- poration•roe, inr.hesper. May F. nnoek, gliam, wine. hr,,gnsonon-