Star. — London, England, 1810-03-02 00:00:00

1 NNE' PAIRLIAMENT4Rr PROCEEDING& HOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH 1. PORTSMOUTH, FEBRUARY 28, 1310. MR. JOHN SMITH begs to inform his FrioOs and the Public, the final Dissolution of his Copartners* with Mr. J. N. ROBINSON having this day taken place, that he intends carrying on the business of a Ship Chandler, &c. on own sole account, 't No. 't 4, Broad-street, on the Point, the pre sent residence of Mr. George Toop. J. S. begs to return his sincere thanks for the favours conferred on the Firm of Smith and Robinson, and trusts, by his assiduity and attention to business, to merit the confidence of those who may commit their commands to his care. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY moved the Thanks of the House to the Lord Bishop of Chester, for his sermon at West- Ininster Abbey yesterday, and that his Lordship be desired to cause the same to be 'stinted and published —Ordered. The Marquis of LANSDOWNE moved an Address to his Majesty, praying for the Staff Journal of the Walcheren Expedi • tione—Ordered. DISTILLATION. The Earl of ALBEMARLE presented a Petition from the Owners, Occupiers, and Farmers of Land, and Barley Growers *gentling Lynn market, in Norfolk, praying to be beard by them selves or Counsel, against the Cora Distillation Prohibition Bilk His Loadship obaereed, that from the extensive interests con nected with this Petition, he had no doubt that it would meet with the attention of the House. The Petition having been read, his Lordship expressed a hope that the HOWe would give time for these Petitioners to be beard by Counsel, and with that view moved that the Bill be read a second time on Monday next. Earl BATHURST observed, that the Act which it was the object of this Bill to continue, would expire in a very few days, and as the Petitioners might be heard in another stage of the Bill, be therefore objected to postponing the second reading. The Earlof HARDWICKE urged, that the information moved Sir, with reference to this subject, was not yet upon the table, and therefore that it was incumbent on the House to postpone the second rerling, in order to give time for the production of that information. The Earl of DARNLEY complained of the manner in which Bills of this description were brought up to the House, so little time being given to their Lordships for considering them. The Earl of LIVERPOOL objected to postponing the second reading, as the Act which it was proposed to continue would rt yke on Wednesday. The Earl of LAUDERDALE contended, that it would be highly indecent to proceed to the second reading without having the necessary information before the House, pirtietilarly as the Committee of the House of Commons upon this subject in 18Q8, bad deprecated the continuance of the prohibition. Lord HOLLAND thought the Petitioners might be heard on the third reading, and that there was no necessity for postponing the second reading. Lord Viscount SIDMOUTH said, it was very unusual to hear Petitioners against a Bill on the third reading. He was of opinion, that die second reading ought to be postponed, to give time for investigating the subject, it being known that since the prohibi tion was first enacted, the price of barley had been much depre ciated, and that the price of sugar had considerably increased. I an PATHURST moved to insert the word" now," instead " Monday next." The Bouse divided an the question that the words "Monday next" stand part of the motion. Consents is—Non Contents 26—Majority 13. The Bill was read a wood time, and committed for to-morn:ow. 1 he Earl or HARDWICKE gave notice, that he should -nove in the Committee to limit the prohibition to three Months. The Petition presented by the Earl of Assam', it La was, on hia I.ordship's motion, ordered to lie on the table till the third read ing, and the Petitioners to be then heard by Counsel. EAST-INDIA COMPANY. The Earl of LAUDERDALE gave notice of a motion for Thursday next, for a Select Committee to inquire into the State, and Report en the actual Situation of the Affairs of the East-lndis Compauy.--Adiomrwed till to-morrow (this day.) HOUSE OF eommoNs. The Grand Union Canal Bill was thrown out on the second reading, by a division of I£6 spina 100. Mr. SHERIDAN postponed his motion on the Petition rela tive to the Benchers of Lincoln's-inn till Tuesday. Mr. FOS FER moved that a Committee be appointed to exa mine into the progress made in the execution of an Act of the 49th of the King, as to the Draining of Bogs in Ireland.—Or . tiered. Mr. ROSE gave nptice of a motion for a Committee on Mon day, upon that part tit the Warehousing Bill which related to the Unties on Foreign &lin Linens exported. Mr. FOSTER thought proper thus early to announce that the effect of the measure proposed to. be brought forward by his Right Honourable Friend would be to benefit the Linen Trade of Ireland. On the motion of Sir JOHN SINCLAIR, the Stage Coach Re gulation Bill was read a second time, and ordered to be commit ted to a private Committee. Sir JOHN NEWPORT moved, that the return of Compensa tions made in Ireland, in consequence of certain Offices recently abolished in that Country, which had been ordered by the House on the Ist of February last, should be laid ost the Table forthwith. Mr. FOSTER observed, that the Compensations alluded to had not yet been finally settled, and that was the only cause of the de lay which the Right Hon. Baronet complained of, but still he should not object to the motion. After a short observation from Mr. W. POI.E, the Motion was &Vet d to. Mr. WARD moved for leave to bring in a Bill to regulate the Marine Pay Office. The object was, to obtain additional secu rity againt the embezzlement of the public money in this De partment—to render the offence a misdemeanor—and to provide that offvn(lrs. in this respect, should be incapable of holding any civil office under the Crown —Leave given. Mr. 13ULMER presented returns of the Local Militia.—. Laid on the table. Mr, WELLESLEY POLE moved for leave to bring in a Bill to explain and amend an ACt of the Irish Parliament of the sth of Ceotge the Second, relative to the Fraeds of Tenants, and the 31.urc easy execution of Leases ; with a view to the application of Surplus Funds to the Charity of Mr. Erasmus Smith, to the main t mince of Protestant Schools. • Mr. LbALIE FOMER supported the motion. M.r.-W. POLE said, it was his intention to bring before Par liament th'e whole National Education of Ireland. Mr. M. FITZGUALD Mt satisfied with this assurance, and 'Per a few words farther, leave was given to bring in the Bill. Mr. CROKER moved for a minute of the Admiralty Board relative to bet Lillo.—Ordered. LORD CHATHAM. Mr. WHITBREAD g'ee notice, that he would to-morrow submit some Resolutions to the House, !bonded upon th e evi dence of Lord Cha th am on the 2!d and 27th of February; and on tt. answer returned from his Majesty to the Address, for whatever frtber narrative, paper, &c. might have been delivered by Lord Chatham. In the mean time, he wished that Gentlemen would read the 'evidence. if The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER, some time after, requested that this notice might be postponed, as there was other important business for to-morrow; and as it was doubtful whe ther the evidence of the 27th would be ready in time for the pe- Fuel of the Members. Mr. WIIITIAEAD said, the evidence was short, and if deli vered printed to-night there would be sufficient time to examine It was importabt to submit the resolutiorti as soon as possille. If the printed evidence could not be delivered in dine, 9f course htt must postpone the proceeding till Monday. CATUOLIq OF WATERFORD. Sir JOHN NEWPORTlresented a Ft:Won, Fraying the re tet,/eal of Disabilities from the P eman Catholics of Waterford, whom be cbaracterizo4 U inch of the highest respectability. t°ie at the same timir inetttioacci instances in which many of ti *Menet% and their catutectiot:s had devoted themselves t.; the service of their cOuntry, and' shed their blood in its de fi:ue. He stated that there existed every disposition to acord any reasonable secdritrtbn might be deemed necessary to protect the establidunent.—The Petition was ordered to lie on ;he table. I.OTTERI/0 ? _, M. WIIITBREAD gave Ueda. that he aitouki to-ruorroir 11.• re for a returak of: the Licences to Lotttry Office Lepers, and et ebc number of "Ficists sold by seek. 111EOICAL !AIM. • Lord TEMPLE, with a view to satisfy the %bile tin Mt 10 ject ..of the formation of the new Medical 130ard, moved $ Copies of the Instructions retative thereto; of the Letters whit passed between the Stereta i ry of Eitate and Commander in CU on the subject; and for a return of the amount of Pen.intui grunt to the Members of the late Medical 13eard.—Ordered. REVERSIONS. Mr. BANKES moved that a Committee be appointed to in spect the Journals of the House of Lord*, in relation to any pro feedings which might have taken place before their Lordships in the course of the present Session of Parliament or the subject of Granting Offices in Reversion, or for joint lives, with benefit of Survivorship, with power to them to report the same to the House.—Ordered. Mr. BANKES then named his Committee, being generally the names of the Committee en Public Expenditure. OFFICERS OF THE CUSTOMS. --- On the motion of Sir JOHN NEWPORT, there was ordered to be laid before the House an account of the Sums granted as I compensation for the Fees of the Officer!. of Customs at the Ports of London, Bristol, and Liverpool, and of the Salaries paid to those who now execute those duties. Vr JOHN NEWPORT asked, if it was in contemplation to carry into force the suggestions of the Commissioners appointed to examine into Fees in Ireland ? Mr. W. POLE said, that was now under the consideration of the I.aw Officers. Sir JOHN NEWPORT asked, if the Right Honourable Gen tleman had received any communication front the Commissioners of the Revenue relative to the Bth Report? Mr. W. POLL admitted, that having sent the Repprt to Lord Annesley he had ieceived a long paper in return, but he did not see much in it. INSOLVENT IDElritatS. Mr. GRATTAN gave notice, that he should to-morrow move for leave to bring in a Rill to extend and amend the Laws re. liming to Insolvent Debtors in Ire Lind. CHARITABLE DONATIONS. Mr. WILBER FORCE moved the second reading of the Cha ritable Donations Bill. Mr. S. swam thought the Bill unnecesrary. He was not aware because Charities had been abused, that every man should be obliged to enroll the Charities intrusted to his care. He thought they were sufficiently protected by the Statute of Queen Elizabeth. After a few words from Mr.WILBERFORCE and Mr. HAR VEY COMBF., the Bin was read a second time, and ordered to be committed for Tuesday se'nuight. IRIsII DISTILLERIES. On the motion of Mr. FOSTER, the House went into a Com mittee on the acts relative to Distillation in Ireland. Mr. FOSTER then stated it to be his intention, with the leave of the Committee, to bring in a Bill for amending the Laws re lating to Distillery in Ireland. The principal feature in this Lai should be to reduce the duties from ss. 8d per gallon to 2s. Gd. then by hoping to diminish, if not entirely to prevent, illegal distillation. He did not believe this would greatly reduce the re venue, as it would hold out a strong encouragement to the fair dealer. He was willing, however, so far to sacrifice the revenue to the cause of morality among the people. Sir JOHN NEWPORT heartily concurred in this alteration. I He wished, however, that the system was changed, and that li- I eences rather than inspection by Excise Officers should be adopted. Mr. Fos•rmt contended, that the inadequacy of the system of licences was to be seen from this, that they had risen from ,ea to X 164. The Union, too, by the introduction of countervail ing denies rendered that system impracticable. Mr. BERESFORD wished to know if any allowance of duty was to be made for the stock of spirits on hand ? Mr. FOSTER said, such a measure would be productive of endleSs difficulty and confusion. In the Commutation Tax on Tea there was no such allowance. Mr. PARNELL supported the observations of Sir John New port. Mr. HUTCHTNSON complained of the vascillatlons in the system, and contended strongly in favour of licences. After some other remarks, the Chairman was instructed to move for leave to bring in the Bill, which on the House resum ing, was granted to him. Mr. FOSTER moved, and it was accordingly ordered that the House should on Monday resolve into a Committee, to consider the propriety of bringing forward a BID for lowering the Duties upon Spirits distilled from corn in Ireland. ?4R. FULLER. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER rose, and stated that he had been authorized by Mr. Fuller, now in the custody of the Serjeant atArrns, to express the deepest regret for the outrage of which he had been guilty, and to request, in Mr. Fuller's name, that he might be discharged. As Mr. Fuller had thus expressed his regret for his conduct therefore, and had thus apologized, he trusted the House would think that it had expressed irs sense of the impropriety of such conduct in a manner sufficiently strong, and that enough had been done to support their dignity and authority. He concluded, by moving that Mr. Fuller be now discharged out of custody. Lord TEMPLE was sure that the House must be aware how unpleasant it was to rise to speak in oppo sition to the most lenient proposal upon a personal question. But there were times and circumstances which required that these feelings should be sur mounted, and which demanded that Gentlemen should not shrink from a strict discharge of their duty, however unpleasant. It was hardly necessary for him, he trusted, to disclaim any personal hostility to the Gentleman to whom this motion related; but after the extraordinary, outrageous, and highly ag gravated insult which had been experienced by the House ; an outrage the more serious as it had been committed within their walls ; and the more aggra vated as it had been directed, not to the Members alone, but to the person of the Speaker ; after all I these circumstances he could not make up his mind I to pass the matter with so slight a punishment ; no more indeed than what might be suffered by any of the Members if a quarter of an hour behind his time on a call of the House. The House, would, no doubt, recollect that a committal to the custody of the Serjeant at arms often took place upon being a few minutes behind their time at election ballots. It was impossible for him, therefore, consistently with his sense of what was due to the House and the Speaker, to suffer such outrageous conduct to pass with so slight a mark of the resentment of the House. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER claimed the indulgence of the House to say a few words. He confessed that he did not see the matter in the same light as the Noble Lord did. He agreed with the Noble Lord, that the scene of th.e evening before the last was a scene of extraordinary outrage ; but the extravagance of the outrage evidently dis played the state of the Hon. Gentleman—a state which, in his opinion, did not tender it the indispen sible duty of the House to proceed with great seve .rity. The Noble Lord compared the confinement of the Hon. Gentleman to the confinement of a Member who had been too late for a Call of the Honsc. The two kinds of confinement were, however, by no means analogous. It was true that the periods were the same,. but the difference was, that in the case of the Hon. Gentleman the House of Commons had ex pressed their strong sense of the impropriety of his conduct that mark d the difference between the two punishments. If the ; House were to allow the con tinement of. the .Hon. Gentleman to continue for many days, they could at last have but that which he had already offered—his contrition for his offence.— thetea r nsa li cte. e Indeed, On the very evening that the eirentiltance 1 the Right Hononrahle Gentleman, that Mr. • t r i.i .t .i . : et occurred, so instantly did the Hon. Gentleman be- ! called to the bar, there to make an apeleo le a e come sensible of his misconduct, that he authorised ! House in person. • another Hon. Gentleman to tender his apology to Sir E. 'KNATCHBULL expressed the Moose, Amon as soon as the offence had been concern which he felt at the whole of the • rreit No one 'terse *more soliCitons an..a committed. He did not conceive th e Hon. Gentle- t a transaction at which he had not been present, a '' man intended any personal offence to the Chair ; and 1 which had been related to him from two n he ' c ~ he rather supposed that it must be the opinion of i quartars; of than h oes a r those who witnessed the transaction, on a full review ; for the maintenance of the character, digeity a, ~ l of all the circumstances attending upon it, that the I privileges of the House of Commons ; offence was to the House at large. He was one of . fessed that he did not think the apology whic h Lli the last men who would be disposed to allow any perso- just been offered was sufficient for the Hous to rr. 1 nal offence to the Chair of that House to pass without ceive. At the same time he entertained t h e ai ght ,,, t severe punishment ; but he really thought that in the i regard for the credit, character, and h onour posei le present instance no such offence was intended. Under ' unfortunate Gentleman - himself, on whom the I he had these circumstances, he trusted that the Noble Lord ! that day called, and of whom he hoped he ere! would not persevere in thinking that there were cir- anticipate too much when he declared his cony '. • n"t cumstances of aggravation in this case which deman- that if he (Mr. Fuller) conceived that he had cast ded the infliction of further penalty ; but that he and the slightest imputation on the Chair of that H . the House would be of opinion that enough had been ' he would be inost ready at the bar of the Hou ( s ' Ce; done to support their own dignity, and that the Hon. I acknowledge his error, and to make every Gentleman might be relieved from his personal con- 1 t a h p e ol H og o y no f u o r r a i b o le G H e e n t t r ie u r st: l d n mthiagthtaniz asro,orleTl4.Ne'ddilt:/..,. finement. 1 Mr. C. VYNNE allowed that the expression of I make, would be deemed a sufficient 4• t OneM:Mt i+ ^ the displeasure of the House which the Honourable . his offence. ! Gentleman had incurred was a severe punishment.— Mr. Secretary RYDER was not d'epesee to exte. Still he thought something more was due to the dig- nuate the offence of the Honourable Ge e 11 L 121311, bid nity of the House. The Hon. Gentleman had not 'he could not refrain from observing, rj • , t he • • . . 1.1.. evittee committed one offence alone ;it would appear on the ! situation of the Honourable Gentleman whim tne Journals that in the first place he had used language I disgraceful scene took place, although no excuse f r in the highest degree offensive and disrespectful : that I his conduct, yet certainly proved that his offence veil for this language he had been ordered (after having l not one of premeditation. Indeed it could be attri withdrawn) into the custody of the Serjeant at Arms. i bated only to the state of the Honourable Gentlemen It would then appear that the Hon. Gentleman for-; at the time—s state which rendered him insensible to Iced his way in at the door, and grossly insulted the ' the impropriety of his behaviour. At the same time whole House,compelling the Speaker, with a prompt- he so far concurred in the sentiment of the Honour ness which did him the greatest honour, to resume I able Gentleman opposite, and differed front those of the Chair without a question, for the purpose of pro- his Right Honourable Friend that he did think, with tecting the dignity of the House itself. If the Right a view to example, it would be right to amend his Honourable Gentleman's motion were acceded to, Right Honourable Friend's proposition, and to order this narrative of outrage on the Journals would be that Mr. Fuller be called to the bar and reprinianded followed by a statement, that without any further by the Speaker. As to the observations made by the punishment, the apology of the Hon- Gentleman was Noble Lord with respect to the way in which the admitted, and that he was consequently discharged. whole proceeding would appear on the Journals, it He thought that at least a course should be preserved would be seen there that the discharge of the offee , similar to that which had been frequently adopted, der did not take place on the day immediately sub ' when Members in their speeches used terms of a re- sequent to the offence. Nor did he think that the pie prehensible description, namely, that the Honoura- nishment which the Honourable Gentleman had al. ble Gentleman should be reprimanded by the Speaker ready sustained, and the punishment of any Menthe; —for it must be recollected, that • the observations for absence from an election ballot, were at all ca. made by the different Members did not find their pable of comparison. way to the Journals, on which, however, would be The SPEAKER said, that before he put re entered'the reprimand of their legitimate organ. The amendment of the Right Honourable Gentleman, be strongest argument in favour of the Honourable perhaps owed it to the Honourable Gentleman wiin , e Gentleman was the neglect of the House in having conduct was under discussion", to state to the Hon s e frequently allowed former instances of improper con- that he had that afternoon received from the Hon. duct to pass unnoticed. Had the House done their Gentleman a letter of pc rs inal apology for the expire. duty on former occasions, they would not have wit- sions relative to himself, of the uttering of v hich, messed the recent scene. he (the Speaker) had been wholly unconlci-ins at . Mr. LOCKHART observed, that it was rather too the time. Had he been aware of them, he'vevcr, he hard at this moment to allude to the former conduct trusted that the House would do him the credit to of Mr. Fuller ; if the Honourable Gentleman who believe that he was incapable of entertaining any cot. spoke last really did mean to allude to him. The ing of personal resentment, or any sentiments different House not having noticed it, it ought not to be from those which the House at large must entertain brought up against Mr. Fuller in his present situation. on the general conduct of the Honourable Gentle. (Hear, hear.) —He knew how much Mr. Fuller re - man.—(Hear, hear, hear.) F retted the outrage into which he had been betrayed The SPEAKER observed, that he understood in an unwary moment, and he knew that his regret the Honourable Baronet only to have thrown out a was the more keen, on account of the misconception , suggestion, without embodying it into a formal which he found to prevail both in and out of the amendment ; but if he had misapprehended the 110- House, as to his having meant any disrespect to the nourable Member, he hoped the House would gilt' Speaker. He had done all that was in his power to him leave to correct himself. counteract that impression. He had apologized for Sir R. WILLIAMS then said, that he would se'• his offence, and expressed his regret that lie should cond the Amendment of the Right Hon. Gentleman have been led into it. He hoped, therefore, the opposite (Mr. Ryder). House would feel that its dignity would not be in the The question being put, least compromised by assenting to the motion. Sir J. ANSTRUTHER conceived it his duty to Mr. WHITBREAD said, that he 'had sat for 20 state, that the conduct of the Hon. Gentleman ap years in the House and never witnessed such a gross peered to him to proceed from that species of mei outrage as had been committed the other night. He dental misfortune—(Here the Hon. Gentleman was was present—he saw it all—he heard it rill—but interrupted by cries of Question, Question.) —From the would not quote the language used. Those who moment of the occurrence of the circumstance, he hid were present would recollect that it was only by an thought that a personal 'apology to the Speaker wis accidental circumstance that the outrage had been necessary before the discharge of the lion. Gentle prevented from proceeding to the utmost excess of man could take place. That apology, it seems, bet violence. (Hear, Hear.) —After this Mr. Fuller sent been made, and he wished to know whether it cull the House a sort of an apology directed to the appear on the journals of the House ? ' Chancellor of the Exchequer (Hear, Hear.) The SPEAKE R re p lied, that not an y thin g Iltc a i The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER personal insult to himself appearing on the journal; here interrupted Mr. Whitbread, and said, that he of the House, would 'at once supersede the necessity uaderstood the apology to be directed to the House, of any apology to himself appearing there. though it had been inclosed in a letter to him. • Mr. G. VANSITTART asked whether any ape Mr. WHITBREAD, in continuation, insisted logy whatever would-appear on the journals ? that it was directed to the Chancellor of the Exche- The SPEAKER: adduced a case which happened quer, and taking up a paper from the table, read— two'years ago. A . Mernber having incurred th e de " I beg you will inform the House that I ant sorry for pleasure of the House, but having immediately coo what I have done, and beg leave to apologise for my fessed his error, that confession was stated on tie conduct." This was directed to the Chancellor of Journals as the round on which the House consent the Exchequer. (Murmurs on the Ministerial Bench.) ed to pass over his offence. The paper itself s ewed that such was the fact, and it The amendment of Mr. Secretary RYDER (with the was impossible they could deny it. Of the letter addition of the word " now") was then agreed to; inclosing this apology the House knew nothing * as it and the Speaker ordered the Serjeant at Arms to brine was not on the table ; but after all, the apology was Mr. FULLEit to the Bar. far from being couched in very strong terms. (Hear , On Mr. FULLER ' S appearance , the SPEAKER 2d hear.) Gentlemen had talked a great deal lately dressed him in the most dignified and imp ressive maa about their privileges. One man for a violation of ner , words — them had lately been reprimanded at their bar, and ' and nearly in the following " Mr. Fut.tre—You stand at that Bar, in the presence of the another had been sent to Newgate, and was the House to suffer an outrage within its walls—the greatest • 'nes of ilin their displeasure. During the progress sof a Coaum outrage that had ever been committed, to pass with United Commons of this Realm, to receive the declaration of House, employed in a most solemn and important Inquirit Yu' : this slight mark of its sense of such conduct ? When • offensive language an Honourable Baronet, who Was present at the time, should be made to the authority of the whole House. Odic(' 00 thought that he who c om mitted this outrage ought or you a,ggravated your Ltst and disorderly conduct required that an r e ra l by the House to excuse your err , to be sent to the Tower, it would not perhaps be con oßbnce by insulting the character sidered as harsh, that he (Mr. W.) expected a much itself. You were ordered in conseque nce to withdraw frog ' the House, an order more ample apology • and even supposing an ample which ought to have been alik e obli g ator! be apology to made, he could not . have thought it on your p erson and on your honour ; • but you broke thr ou g h . possible that the offending person should be dismissed and the dignity of the Ho restraint, and re twered these wail* with °way and without a reprimand from the Chair. When Gen- i tlemen who saw the outrage, doubted, if it would be i unparalleled. consistent with %he dignity of t! e House to allow the I felt only cos man who had so insultingly violated its privileges and i I can with the utmost sincerity assure you, that rules, ever to sit there again, it proposed to dismiss Member should so deg " This is the bead and front of your offending. For tnrelf. i cern and regret that any Honourable . the matter with this meagre apology and slight con finement I (Hear, hear.) Many Gentlemen present row which have been offered to the House this night on your f your Offellee, 6 had seen the outrage; 411 of them had heard of it ; half, as well as early after the commission o himself ; and I ant willing to believe, from the expressions of the whole public rung with it. He affirmed, that not Y treated you, ri the House alone, but the Speaker had been insulted ; . For the moderation with winch this Howe has led, he had heard the language used. He would not owe it to your most humble and grateful acknow . or quote it, unless he was challenged to do so. But if to tuictake its You now experience a due sense of ttr nature of your own ern( Let nht this considerate forbearance lead you heshould be challenged to quotethe words, e t thought titres, Or neglect its warning : for if unhaPPi they were such as would leave no doubt of e cor- future period relapse into similar practices, I fear that tn a l l t , rectness of his conclusion. He must therefore oppose bability there can be but one measure which it will Neer% : thority f#0 1 " i .%. ' It :, the motion. Mouse to adopt, in order to rescue its au A 1 r. 1 - hility of coatitskier Sir It. WILLIAMS thought it gide to advise- dlagroce, and Wralttave 7011 file" di. P it ' • g Vr...: : &joined by the IsioJ able to propose, as an amendrnerst to t e suet= of .presuniiiiiitieli cantest. I have beta r ly you s hould ~st.oir