Star. — London, England, 1822-07-23 00:00:00

-.. . PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDINGS. PROCEEDINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 29. Their Lordships met at eleven o'clock, to hear Appeals. Barren and Ovneas, Appellants; Dues, Respondent.—Mr. *meant. was heard out for the appellant.—Further hearing postponed to the next Session. A little before four o'clock, the Loan Cuawcattoa, the Earl of Suarrassuay, and Lord RIDESDALR appeared as his Ma }esty's Commissioners, and brought the Royal Assent to the fol lowing Bine : The Loan Bill, the Charge of Pensions Bill, the Five per Cent. Repayment Bill, the Scotch Spirits Drawbacks Bill, the Consolidated Fund Growing Produce Bill, the Marriage Act Amendment Bill, the Small Notes Bill, the Bankrupts Joint Commissions Bill, the Fees of Courts Bill, the Irish Prisons Bill, the 111-treatment of Cattle Bill, the Bakers' Regulation Bill, the Middlesex County Rates Bill, and several Private Bills. Mr. BROODER and others brought up from the Commons the following Bills :—The Alien Bill, the Salt Duty Reduction - Bill, Use Exequer Bills Issue Bill, the Irish Constables' Bill, the `Receivara'-General Bill, the Thames Ballastage Bill, the Court of Exchequer Sittings Bill, the Scotch Royal Burghs Regula tion Bill, the Ireland Money Relief Bill, and the Scotch Magis trates' Re4idence Bill. The Alien Bill having been read a first time, The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that understanding that it would be convenient for several Noble Lords who were adverse to the measure, not to attend for some days, and being desirous at the same time, at this late period of the Session, that as little delay as possible should occur in the passing of this Bill, be should trust that the Noble Lords would not object to taking the discussion on the third reading. Lord HOLLAND. though strongly opposed to the measure, had no objection to the course proposed by the Noble Earl. It was then agreed, on the motion of the Earl of Loisoroot, that the Bill should be printed. His Lordship then gave notice, that he should move the second reading pro forma on Wednes day, and the third reading on Monday next. The Irish Constables' Bill having been read u first time, was also ordered to be printed on the motion of the F.arl of LIVER POOL, and the second reading was fixed for next Wednesday. The other Bills from the Commons were than read a first time. Mr. TOMLYNS, from the Treasury, presented a Report from the Commissioners of the Northers Light House.—Laid on the table. The Earl of LIVERPOOL having signified his Majesty's consent to the House proceeding with the Bill for regulating the Offices of the Duchy of Cornwall, the Duchy of Cornwall Bill went through a Committee, and was reported. The Leather Duty Reduction Bill and the Irish Endowed Schools Bill went also respectively through Committees, and were reported. The house having resolved itself into a Committee on the Bill for continuing the Irish Insurrection Act, The Marquis of L A NS D 0 «N, pursuant to his notice, moved that the clause depriving persons suffering under the operation of the Act, of the power of bringing actions against Magistrates and having them tried by Juries, be omitted.—The motion was negatived without a division, the Iku;e resumed, and the Re port of the Committee was received. The Earl of ROSSLYN presented a Petition front the In corporation of Hammermen of the Royal Burgh of Inverness, against the Scotch Burghs Regulation, and the Scotch Magis trate,' Residence Bills.—Laid on the table. The English and Irish Insolvent Debtors' Bills went respec tively through Committees, and were ordered to be printed. On the motion: of the Marquis of Las:snow:4, a message was ordered to he sent to the Commons for a copy of the Report o f Commissioners on the Holyhead Road. SLAVE TRADE. - - -- The Marquis of LA W NSDOW N, seeing that a Resolution' had been adopted by the other House, expressing its abhorrence the Slave Trade, and its confidence that his Majesty's Minis ters wou!,l continue their earnest endeavours to induce other Powers to rern'er its abolition effective, wished to say, that if he had not called their Lordships' att,ntion to the subject, in the form of a distinct proposition, it was because he had no new facts to produce since the Address moved by their Lordships last year, unless it were the fact, that notwithstanding that Ad- d rei ,, th e a kar f .• Trade, as tar as it regarded the great Continental Powers, had ma no progress, and the infa nrous t! .111iC was 4... tried on by France and Portugal to a very large nhstanding their professions, engagements, and treaties. It was, however, a cheering view to lioo that, amongst tl.e new Government who had lately established their indepen dence, a le.dirg es.ia:, a out. .t o. tion of the Slave Trade which did then' hentour. lle truste.. tb t England, in common wOli other Mainline Powers, would enter into some general agreement and ctme,rt to put down that traffic amongst their own subjects, and to compel other States to do the same. With that h.,p, in a futore Session of l'arliament, he should call their LGresl7ips' attention in a more detailed manner to the subject. —After the 11,in:unto' agreed to by the other llouse, he con ceived he should not have done his duty if he had not avitiled himself of the last opportunity aich he should have this Sestion, to address these few words to their Lordships. PRISON LAWS. Vicount SiDmouTii having moved that the House do rcsnlve it 41 ilito a Committee on the Prison Laws Consoli dation 11.11, The LORD CHANCELLOR said, 'that a subject of that importahce required more time for consideration than it was possible for the House to give it at this advanced period of the Session ; he should, therefore, propose that the further consider ation of the measure be, in one sense of the word, postponed for three inontlis. If this were agreed to, he should himse'f undertake to bring in this Bill, exactly in the same state as it now was,without, however, being bound to support all its provisions, the moment that Parham:nit met again. Viscount SI DMOUT II regretted that the Bill bad not been brought forward at au earlier period, and was convinced that _much disappointment would be felt in various parts of the coun try, at its being delayed. It was impossible, however, for him Lot to comply with the proposal of the Noble and Learned Lord, and not to express his satisfaction at finding that he would bring in a Lill on the subject. The LORD CHANCELLOR did not undertake to bring in a r ßill on the subject, but the same Bill, in order that, being in troduced a; an early period, there should be a full opportunity fur collecting informition and for discussion. The Marquis of LA NSDOWN acquiesced, from the nature of the case, in the course proposed. He understood, however, that the Nob!t. Viscount wished to make some amendments in the Bill, and suggested the propriety of their being made before the Bill was postponed. The Earl of LIVERPOOL and Lord REDESDALI approved of the suggestion. The Bill might then be printed with its amendments, and circulated through the country, which would have a full op portunity of considering the measure. The House thenwent into the Committee, and the amendments having been proposed and agreed to, the House resumed, and cite Bill was ordered to be printed as amended.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. C • The SCEACER was summoned to the House of Peers. On his return, be informed the House that the Royal Assent had been given by Commission to the Loan Bill, the RI-Treatment of Cattle 13111, and other Bills; for which see the Lords. A Person from the Commissioners of Sewers presented Ac counts of the Sums received and expended by the said Corn micsion.—Ordered to lie on the table. _ _ A Lill for regulating the Duties on Stamps in Ireland was breugbt in, read a first, and ordered to be read a second time to-morrow. . Colonel DAVIES begged to creams on . the House for a few moments, in consequence of a misrepresentation having been put forth in some of the New.;,apers, of what he had said on a former evening. He did not know that he should have noticed the circumstance if comments had not been made on what he was supposed to have stated. • Those comments would have been just had he said what he was supposed to have said, but this not being the case, in order to set himself right it be came necessary to say that the comments in question were founded on a mistake. What he had said was this, that he had been on board the Turkish frigate in the river, and had spoken with the person who was second in command. He had stated that the frigate mounted 58 guns, not that she had them mounted. Ile bad never said that she had 250 British sailors on board, but that' be was told she was•to sail with 250 English seamen, who were wanted to make up her complement. He had said that this was intended, and to this he adhered, for he had no doubt that if Government had not interfered, an attempt would have t to a gallant Att. such 11sterference Was ieeeseary? He called the attend's of the House to the subject now, because If he allowed it to appear that be bad made the assertion imputed to him, it must be thought that he had stated what was not true. On the mosion of the Loan Anvocara, the Amendments made by the Lords to the Scotch Jury Bill were agreed to, and the Bill sent back to their Lordships. Mr. S. RICE presented a Petition front Ensebius Mackille curry against the. Irish Coronereßill.—Ordered to Ue on the table. The Report of the Committee on the Means of supporting Irish Commercial Credit was brought up and agreed to, and a Bill ordered. The Report of the East India Company's Loan Bill was brought up and agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. The Brimstone Drawback Bill, the Smuggling Prevention Bill, and the Greenland Fishery Bounty Bill, were severally read a second time, and ordered to be committed to-morrow. The Reports of the Silk Bounties, and Queen's Servants' Pen sions Bills were brought up and agreed to, and the Bills ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. The Malt Duties Collection Bill went through a Committee, the Report of which was received, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time to-morrow. Mr. GOULBURN presented an Estimate of the sum which might be necessary to enable his Majesty to take such measures as the exigencies of the affairs in Ireland might require.—Or dered to be printed. ORPHANS . FUND. Mr. T. WILSON brought up the Report of the Committee on the Orphans' Fund Bill. The Report stated the Committee to have inquired into the alle gations on which the Bill was founded, and they con sidered them to be true.. They had gone through the Bill, and made some amendments. Mr. H. SUMNER could nbt consent to let the Bill pass in its present state. He described the circum stances which had induced him to bring this subject before the House two years ago. He regretted the absence of an Honourable Baronet who held the si tuation of Receiver of the Coal Duties to the Orphans' Fund. He had objected to the large balances left in his hands ; and it had been ordered that he should only hold the balances for two months. The Hon. Baronet, however (though in two months the ba lances would only amount to about £8000), had everl since retained balances to the amount of . £10,000.1 Ile (Mr. Holme Sumner) did not see, while the duties of that office were correctly performed by the deputy for £lOO, that it was necessary to keep up the situation, continuing to him the advantages he now enjoyed. He did not now make any motien, understanding it to be the intention of one of the Members of the City of London to submit to the House a.proposition on the subject. Mr. BROGDEN was surprised at the course taken by the Hon. Gentleman, after the inquiry which had taken place, and ‘shich, in his judgment, proved that there was nothing to impeach the conduct of the Ho nourable Baronet who had been alluded to. If what had been said on that subject did pot amount to ca lumny, it appeared to him (Mr. Brogden) to go very far that way. The ffrrangement made with respect to the Orphans' Fund, he considered the inquiry to have proved, was the most economical and beneficial that could .be adopted. Mr. Alderman WOOD said, at the proper time he had a clause to propose, which had been put into his hands by his constituents, the object of which was to provide th it the payments on account of the Orphans' rund should be made weekly, instead of quarterly. Mr. LUSHINGTON suggested the pi opriety of postpon:ng the clause. Mr. I3ROG DEN wished the clause po , ,tponed, and for this additional reason, that he had understood that it was the intention of the Hon. Member for Surrey not to offer any further opposition to the Bill. Mr. H. SUMNER said, the Hon. Gentleman who had just spoken made a very broad assertion with re spect to what had fallen from him on the conduct of an Hon. Baronet. It surprised him to hear that he was Lot expected to oppose the Bill, as, in the pre sence of that Hun. Gentleman, he had distinctly stated that he would not give up his opposition. Mr. BROGDEN remarked, it had been said that he made a broad assertion ; his assertion was so broad as this, that if the Honourable Gentleman stated him to have known that it was his (Mr. H. Simmer's) in tention on this occasion to oppose the Bill, he stated that which was iintrue. Pe put it to his Honourable Friend near him (Sir J. Graham) whether it had not been understood that the Honourable Gentleman intended to decline offering any further opposition to the measure? Mr. H. SUMNER said, the Hon. Gentleman bad applied the word " untrue" to what had fallen from him, and he thought it necessary to call for an ex. planation—(Hear, hear). Mr. BROGDEN—...And I will give it. I say, that if the Honour able Gentleman asses is that I knew it to be his int mtion to oppose this Bill to-day, he asserts that which is untrue."—(Hear, hear! Cries of Order! Chair, Chair ! ) The SPEAKER could only excuse himself for not previously interfering, by saying he was sure what had been said was uttered under a mistake. It grew out of a subject on which he was afraid that there had been some warmth elsewhere. He was sure the Hon. Gentleman would admit that he had used language which it was not his intention to use. Mr. BROGDEN had not wished to offend the House in any way. He had stated that he did clot expect the Hon. Gentleman would oppose the Bill to-day. He did not expect that he would do so, and therefore when he saw him get up, and open the whole subject, he had expressed surprise. Upon this the Hon. Gentleman had said, that he made a broad assertion, and in answer to this, he had only said, that if the Honourable Gentleman declared him to have known of its being his intention so to oppose the Bill, he had stated what was incorrect—what was inconsistent with fact. The SPEAKER was now quite satisfied that what had been said, was uttered under a total misunder standing of what had fallen from the Hon. Member for Surrey. He had attended to the Hon. Member, and was sure he understood him. When he talked of a broad assertion having been made, he alluded to the remark of the Hon. Gentleman, that if.what had been said with respect to an Hon. Baronet, did not amount to calumny, it came very close to it. Mr. H. SUMNER said, the Speaker had correctly understood him. It was to that remark that his ob servation applied. Sir J. GRAHAM spoke to the correctness of the statement of the Honourable Gentleman (Mr. Brog den), that on Friday he had not expected the Hon. Member for Surrey intended to offer further opposi tion to the Bill. Mr. T. WILSON said, if the conduct of the Hon. Baronet (Sir W. Curtis) was bad. that of the Cor poration of London was equally bad in suffering him to hold them. But he had a palliative to offer.— When the office was given to the Hon. Baronet, the balances were small, they had increased by degrees, and the-interest on them, though of importance to an individual, had not been considered an object to the Corporation. A former Receiver had to pay four or five thousand pounds out of his own pockets for sums which would otherwise have been lost to the Corporation. It was therefore necessary, as what had happened once might occur a;ain, to obtain good security. The Honourable Member for Surrey always took advantage of mention being made of the Orphans Fund or the City Lands, to bring forward charges against the Corporation of the City of Lon don, as if those funds were only appropriated to fa vouring jobs, as the Public derived no benefit from them. He would ask if the Public derived no benefit from the buying off the toll on London Badge, the building of Blackfriar's Bridge, and the purchase of the toll on that bridge ? Mr. H. SUMNER remembered that a hope had been expressed on a former day, that nothing would be said on the bringing up of the Report. He had then said, that if nobody else took it up, he did not know that he should offer any observations on the subject. -He was convinced that what had been said was said under a misconception. But he had not pledged himself to support, or not to oppose the Bill, and if he bad done so at that time, enough had since occurred to justify him in altering his determination. Mr. BENNET said, that he thought the office of Receiver unnecessary. Mr. HUME was of the same opinion. Mr. Alderman WOOD moved, that the word • quarterly" should be struck out of the Bill prepara tot y to the introduction of the clause which he had announced it-to be his intention to move hereafter. The House then divided, when the numbers were, For the Amendment Against it _ Dlajutity in favour of the Clause as originally worded —23 When strangers were re-admitted the SPEAKER was putting the question that the Bill should be en grossed. On this Mr. H. SUIVER moved as an Amendment, that the Bill should be engrossed on that day six months. The House again divided, when the numbers were, For the Amendment - - - 12 Against it - - - - 30 nijority in favour of the Bill - —lB The Bill was ordered to be read a third time. MR. WOOLER. Sir F. BURDE•TT presented a Petition from Mr. Wooler, at present suffering imprisonment in War wick Jail, on a most important subject—the practice of packing Julies.—The Petition set forth that great abuses prevailed, similar (though they had not yet risen to so great a height) to those complained of be fore the Revolution, and which had cost Charles his life and James his crown. The Petition prayed the House to appoint a Committee to inquire into the manner in ss hich Juries were nominated by the Master of the Crown Office, and to afford him an opportunity of laying before such Committee the evidence he had it in his power w produce. Mr. C. W. WY NN did not rise to oppose the Peti tion. It was perfectly competent for the Hon. Baronet to bring before the House a complaint against any public officer. He would only beg to ask, if the Master of the Crown Office had been informed that such Petition was about to be presented? Sir F. BURDETT said, not that he knew of. Mr. C. W. WYNN would not say that it was con trary to the duty of the Hon. Baronet to bring for ward such a charge under such circumstances, but he might be excused if he said that it was rdther hard on the individual not to have been informed of it, as in that case he might possibly have answered the charge at the time of its being made. -Sir F. BURDETT had thought it his duty to pre sent the Petition, and did not see that it was likely to do injury to any one. Tli - e Petitionwas then ordered to lie on the table. On the motion that it should be printed, Mr. C. WYNN appealed to the Hon. Baronet if it would be fair to send forth such a charge printed, without any opportunity having been afforded of giving an answer to it? If the Hon. Baronet intended to make a motion on the subject, he thought it would be better to defer printing the Petition till he was about to bring forward his motion. Sir F. BUItDETT said it was his intention to bring the subject under the consideration of the House. He, however, consented for the present to withdraw his motion for printing the Petition. IRISH CORONERS' BILL. The Report of this Bill was brought up. Mr. SPRING RICE moved that the clause re specting the qualification of Coroners be omitted. Mr. R. MARTIN thought it desirable that the Co roner should possess the qualification required by this Bill. It was said this was an es post facto law. He did not know that it would be wrong to pass an ex post facto law to effect an improvement in the admi nistration of justice. He, however, contended, that in point of fact this was not an es post fade,' law, as several Acts required that such o ff i c e rs , b ot h i n Eng land and Ireland should be capable of such amerce mints as might be inflicted en them for their mis- 1 conduct in office. To omit this clause would be to defeat the object of the Bill. Mr. GOULBURN thought that the mere fact of a Coroner not being worth 2001. a-year in property ought not to be a disqualification. He hoped the clause would be withdrawn without a division. Mr. DAWSON said it was desirable that the Bill should pass with unanimity, and he hoped his Hon. Friend would not press the clause. The clause was then withdrawn. After a few words from Mr. R. MARTIN, the Re port was agreed to, and the Bill ordered to be read a third time on Wednesday. SCOTCH PRIM& Mr. ABERCROMBY rose to withdraw the mo tion of which he had given notice, for copies of the correspondence between the L or d Advocate and Mr. Hope, relative to the case of Borthwick. He said that his conviction was, that nothing short of a Com mittee could be satisfactory. Though he postponed the subject for the prestnt, he was perfectly resolved, and he pledged himself to prosecute the matter in the next Session with all the zeal and ardour he possessed., The LORD ADVOCATE noticed the motion for all correspondence, which, though of an extraordi• nary and unprecedented nature , - he did not mean to oppose, is atiler tSit di I whole Twain's might be brought under the consideration of the House. Mr. ABERCROMBY added, that he was satisfied that it had been the intention of the Learned Lord to support the motion ; and he repeated that he wo u l4 lose no time in the neat Session in bringing fat ward the motion for a Committit to investigate thoroughly the question. COMMITTEE OP 11/UPPLY. Mr. GOULBURN moved the Order of the Dig for going into a Committee of Supply. The House having resolved itself into a Committee, a Resolution was proposed for granting a sum eif OM for defraying the expense of building Churches and purchasing Glebes in Ireland. Mr. HUME opposed the vote. He thought t h at the Public had no light to pay this money when the Church of Ireland was overflowing with riches. and the object was to increase its numbers. There had been an order made for returns, moved by the Itivht Hon. Member for Waterford, as to the enotmons re -. venues of thaeChurch, and until they saw what thost revenues were he would not consent to a vote like the present. The property of the Church of Ireland had been computed as equal to the whole revenue of c e Clergy, independent of tithes; and at a time of su-.11 public misery as the present, he could not convei ve how the Public could be asked to pay the expense of building new Churches. He hoped that in the nett Session an inquiry would be gone into, in order to bring a portion of that property to meet the er ne? , gencics of the State. With these views he would not grant a shilling from the public money for sue, a pupose ; and he therefore moved the reduction of the whole sum proposed. Mr. GOULUURN said, that he nay should not n. enter into the subject which the Hon. Mernber thought proper to open. Whenever he should forward his motion, he should be prepared to m eet whatever arguments might be !nought in suppoit of the proposition that the Church devoured the piop e r : of the country. The present vote was not to be pa. ,1 to the Clergy, but for building Churches ; and wl.:1 the Hon. Member conceived that the Church wa s (.;:7 for the benefit of the profes,ors of religion, he x‘ell not find many to support him in hi. extraordip opinions. The Church was intended for the be, of the People, and for that reason it was suppoi:,i. With regard to the distress in Ireland, the vote been reduced two-thirds on that account. Last ; i:.7 it was thirty thousand pounds, now it was un,:er t:i thousand pounds. Sir W. DE CRESPIGNY opposed the Resolui - .r. Mr. S. RICE, without entering into the T.:esti:a of the Church property, was of a different opiaion from the Right Hon. Gentleman opposite. con• damned the policy of building Churches in renr't parts of the country, where the mass of the popula:ici was Catholic. Nothing could so mw - eriallv the progress of the Reformed Religion a- to huil. Protestant Churches in the midst of Catholics, ar,i then tell them they must pay for their support. Mr. C. WYNN could not agree with the able Gentleman, unless he could persuade himself rhi: because in a particular place there were only a :ow Protestants, they must be without a place of wor,: ' Mr. H. GURNEY supported the Amend e. Mr. G. BENNET agreed with the Right 11 able Gentleman, that wherever there were r i ti : . -, ii; ; E • they ought to have the means of public worship ; b.: the question was, where the funds for providing should be obtained ; whether a sum of A:10.000 st ' be advanced out of the public money, or v het!.r7:: ' should be supplied from one of the richest Cluirc'!;s in the world, and one which did less duty and pa: less to the support of the poor than any other? F.: should oppose the vote, until the Returns move:, by the Right Hon. Member for Waterford acre be fore the House. Mr. HUME read a letter from an Under Sec:c!.:7 for Ireland, written some time ago, complai the conduct of the Commissioners of First Fruit , , .1::1 asked if any man of common sense would trust .iny more money in their hands? Mr. GOULBUUN did not know, and was e i c.i:e indifferent upon knowing, the means by Hon. Member had obtained this letter. He knee whether the Hon. Member had the answer to t:l4t letter in his pocket, or whether he was aware of :::! measures which he (Mr. Goulburn) had taker. ty:a that subject. If he was acquainted with tho&e cir cumstances, it would have been b u t f a i r to h ave ,:.1.! . them. It would then have appeared that the cor.:- plaint of the letter was fully answered and expl.c.x.... Mr. MONCK differed from the opinion of th,:11, , - nourable Member for Aberdeen, as to appropii.i: the property of the Church to the expenses of other branch of the State. But at the sense rime !It thought it applicable to the building of Church and Glebe•houses.—The Committee divided : For the Resolution - For the Amendment - Majority f.ti 17 _9 Upon the re-admission of strangers to the Gallery. Mr. S. RICE was found speaking upon a Resolution that 1 %1 been proposed before strangers were admitted. Sir G. HILL said, that the tranquillity and prosperizy North of Ireland depended upon the encouragement the Linen Trade, and no funds could be ill empl applied to so important an object. Mr. HUME contended, that if these establisin supportel by the public money, they would upon so extravagant a scale. Ile did not belies of the support given to them was that which had He thought the infant manufactories alette ought by bounties, but those which were estaMished Ireland should be left to themselves. He sboi sense of the Committee upon this vote. Sir G. HILL said, the whole of these matters the consideration of the Linen Board. The Grant, which was for £19,000, was then On the motion for £276 10s. sd. as an addit to the Chairman of the Board of Inland Navigal Mr. HUME objected to It, as there were £6OOO a year each. Mr. GO ULBURN said that was not correct. Mr. HUME said, the Public had no right to nagement of this ruinous establishment upon itself. as well take on themselves the management of Wa The Grant was then agreed to, as were 516,000 of Works in Ireland. Mr. HUME contended that the work done rection of this Board was charged SO per cent. other public Board. £17,500 for Stationery in Ireland. £7OOO for publishing Proclamations there. Mr. BENNET said, t►is was an unblushing of the Irish Government that it kept so many pay. It was only the obscure Journals tbit tuitions to, and kept in pay. These were net gii of the widest circulation; anti were often put te e ' 4 ~i I 1 a beentuade7•lfri4e appealed alkal i if he had not eaprened an opkgan that - • !: - :3 • 3 I I .4 a flaii " : prosperity iralge.medwthtir.ht7.::: p lishments Were 01 _, not be snainran'r`i i„ that the etr.'• ad bbeendescris4 near to be "14- , d in the North Sould not take t— sv ers had been urs'-‘ : • 1. • hen agreed to. ri n ec it e ts e"l:g th t ivli.ettaelev°l;irrotyw:wma.ui n°fttsnag°l:etaaPldirarr:lioelevrio ate;tirtlhtl' o Bh.r::. n a e ptn riven to the Pa pas t .'h in raper whh _'•