Star. — London, England, 1803-07-08 00:00:00

DUBLIN THEATRI. Yefterday fe'nnight, Mr. Jonn JOHNSTOWN, the celebrated comedian, made his firft appearance in the characters of Sir Callagbax O'Brallagbass, in Leona-1a- Mork, and Looney 111 , Woo!tor, in The Was: of Wiadfor. He was welcomed by his countrymen with great and cordial warmth, and he performed each character with fine conception, receiving in both the unanimous applaufe of an elegant audience. He introduced the following fong with great effect : Safe I'm here, and with joy aimed wild, For in Ireland I firlt faw the Sun, Nth the nation, man, women, and child, You're my countrymen every one ! By the packet I fent pretty fait, Both letters and parcels to greet ye, rnn my own fell I pack'd up at lalt, And my bean jumps with tranfport to meet Thkteen years, or the Almanack lies , Now ate pat finer I left Dublin Bay: Tho' I rode in a Rip, my poor eyes Were fwiniming the whole of the way And while abfent, to fay It I'm proud, Of dear Ireland I lack'd so reminders, Nature's voice In my breaß fituake fo loud, That it bunt in a brogue throe my grinders. Dear &eland's my mother, arab, Old England, her titter I 'rait-.. Thee it fauns &ice this land's my mamma. That I've Raid a long while with my aunt. London !wafts of the Thames for its Sze, Its angels no foul can eall feightfu Patrick owns all &de charms, hill he crier, Oh ! the Liffey and Sheekles delightful !" V you'd know what I've done while away, rn tan you before you can a& It, I have waded for John Ball, and mull fay, He bas put a few eggs in my balk& Dat If eggs are "pledge, I fear Dublin aides may foes have difpatcled 'ent, Pei& nay cep may be all may here, SO I won't came my chicks till I've hauled 'em. Now low/ Vie to yoa, jewels, fay 1, You have judgment, wit, all that is odd, * as Powers rn mat certainly die, If I'm dunn'd by the foes of the fod ; Nat you won't vex your countryman fo, Thanks to Wand far Nub I'm a debtor, Asd Weft "widow's& 1 go, Neogilit but death Salk e'er make me forget her. triday-eveni n g, Mr. Mooney aged the chatader of Sir difisi Has*, le Bls.lfbe Plorgh, and Captain Iftwkeas, in Tia Deaf rower, with ditlingniihed probation. His popularity was eminently difplayed by the early hour at which the Theatre was crowdtd. LAW INTALLIGENCE. COMM OF pliCti, JULY f• • data. CD*. tNITM 0. SNITM. ),fr. Eakiwi bad the cafe. lie regretted that p it became his duty to open to the Jury a cafe of pro. iniquity, and mortice like the preterit : be wmM have wok bed, with all his heart, that the duty ~hia devolved upon Come other perfon, inmate it had bee his built the courfe of his profeffional life, to Rate : Alifla of this actors (thou gh not Of equal enormity) ,fe often, that his mind had beeonwtired of the rub. jea ; and although the injury complained of was lam Of the moft firkins which could be offered to any .. individual. it maid probably be dekribed in more 'glowing colours by a perfon wbo had not like bim been obliged to deipribe over and over again the crime which defiroyld the foam of his client, and was thecae of the pretest wean. To fay that this was as silica of adultery, brought againti a perfon wbo bad violated the ties of tootanginity, and every obligation of gratitude, wbo bad reduced and Rolen away the wife bis relation, his guardian, and his benerador, would perhaps be, to a Jury of morel men, a folieion ihnement of the enormity of the crime. The instal/does wore as follow : The Pk ■dff and the Defendant were mains. german, children of brothers. The Plaintiff had received the Defendant, (who was left an orphan in his infancy.) into his honk, and under his fpecial care and poteilion ; he had fuperintended: his edu cation, wished over him with the care of a father, and - with a brother's affedion, during his apprentice. kip. and afterwards introdueed him into bastes, procured him reeememilations and orders,gave him part of his hook is *gingham, to make a wag& houfe, and always from W Infancy admitted him to his hook on the Haile& footing of fritunifbip and con. fanguinity. tut what was the mums tOn the lith of March the Plaintiff was apprifed, by a letter which his wife left %Wad, that the bad eloped from his honk. and with that near relation whom be had fo long fokered with the care of a father. Althoagb the Jay mak be able to contrive, yet he &odd alto be enabled to prom, how poiguant was the dikes which one of the hidd e nA indulgent, and affec dilate hatbands amailbage iliffered. on learning that a wife, to whom he babas married for sear twelve Teats, who had daring that time borne him many children. aad had few Whips thew living, and when be had always lend mel liaserely. had been thus taken hen him. The fees of the eafe, which he was inlinibed be timid be able fogy prove. , ! were thafe—shm for above tea years the eaeiha of the Behar to hie wife was repaid by apai albeime es het PO that their hips was enteoil toidl ter the 1•11 tor before the - delMllsllo4 Darla' that din the Pisiatiff's wife benne without any rift.* jade, fan tmd inmeadre to bee littheode IMOD' jive to her iblidgeo.gefianlisfe of an the dodge of a wife, and a matter, kin ens the risiosof saw aad a dein - fee ilipeow tics, that " P it was an heopy..• This alisseas dim: steliom, this tomb" (4 so anattatable to food and eaaAdiej hefinade woe merely the awl of the fodoftioa of As Dlha who bad ittfiatte!ed histilif into her afreaionie di tt *Mid bar MO frees its fanny 'obits and mot! isspeetaat *M. The only "mason. ht conceived, that then wool be far the jury to akertain was. whit daimon would be a anape!fation for fo cruel sad agosvated as iyary. Certainly no tumid 'no gg add nine embitClicat his log peace of mead, and that happinefs he Was deprived of by the ael of the Defendant; but fince the law gives no other Mode of punifhing this crime, except by damages in money, he thought the prefent was a cafe for large, and e►en ►indllive damages. The damages were laid in the declaration at 60001. and he trolled if this cafe was made out in evidence, as he had Bated it, the Jury would not diminifh any thing of the (urn the damage was laid at. The Rev. Francis Smith was the firft witnefs ; he was the Clergyman who married the Plaintiff and his wife on the 23d of March, 1790. The Plaintiff's wife was educated at his houfe, and he was always in the habits of perfefl intimacy with the Plaintiff. and frequently 'lilted at his hirife. He himfelf lived livid abiut t 6 miles from Birmingham, but when ever bufinefs called him to that town, he vifited at the Plaintiff's houfe. lie never faw a more indulgent and affedionate hufband ; this affeetion appeared to him always mutual, and he confldered them a very happy couple. Mr. W. Smith, brother to the Plaintiff, had been _ _ in the conftant habits of ftriet friendfhip with his bro ther for about 35 years (Plaintiff is about 4o). He, as well as his brother, had formerly lived in Birming ham, but afterwards removed to Harburn, about two miles and a half diftant. The Defendant is now about 24 years of age, had front his infancy been un der the care of the Plaintiff; in his fchool-boy time, had always palled the holidays with them, and when he was an apprentice came there as often as he could be allowed. When his appreaticefhip had expired, the Plaintiff and the Witnefs took every polEble pains to introduce him into bufinefs, and procure him or ders : the Plaintiff allowed him to convert part of his houfe in Birmingham into a wareboufe. The Plaintiff and his wife had afterwards quitted Bir mingham, and lived at his houfe in Harburn: until the lift two years be confidered them a very happy couple, and never knew a more domeftic man, or a better father than the Plaintiff. For the laft year or two, Mrs. Smith, without any apparent reafon, be came moR indifferent to her hufband, and inattentive to her children, which circumftance defiroyed the happinefs of the Plaintiff, and materially injured his health. She often expreffed her unhappinefs, and wifbed to feparate from her hufband. Neither be nor the Plaintiff underftood or fufpeited the caufe of this alienation of her affeilions: they fuppofed it was mere ly that the did not like living at Harburn. The Plaintiff immediately propofcd taking a houfe for her fome where elfe,but not liking any that they faw,he gave her leave to buy what furniture fhe pleafed for the Louie at Birmingham. The Witnefs dined with them at Birmingham the day before the elopement. Up to that derhe never faw any man more attentive or af. feaionate than the Plalatiff. Since that event he has fuffered the greateft nnhappinefs, and has been totally unable to attend to his ballads. This witnefs was crofs-examined by M.Casst Lis — (The objet of the croft-examination was to afcertain whether the plaintiff had not been guilty of culpable remiffnefs with refpea to the exceflive confidence be placed in his wife and the defendant). He, however, declared, that be was convinced that no fufpicion of this nature ever entered the plaintiff's mind—that he himfelf, although fometimes he thought be perceived rather too much attention from the defendant, would never cherifis in his mind an idea of there being any thing criminal in thefe attentions—he had had fre quent converfations with his brother finee the month of. July AIL in confequence of the great difirefs of mind which the plaintiff fuffered from finding the af t-anon' of his wife alienated from him; but as neither of them furpeeted any criminal caufe, they imputed it merely to her living at Harburn, and were in hopes that changing her refidence would reaore them both to their former happinefs and affeaions. He alto declared, that his reafon for not fill - peeing any thing was, that he had an implicit confidence both in the vin. we of Mrs. Smith, and in the honourof thedefendant. Mr. Woolloftan was a relation, and an intimate friend of the family, and in the habit of viliting them) frequently; he never faw any thing but harmony be-, tween them, , and confidered them as a very happy coil's, war taw any thing that could have alarmed any unanisir his wife's honour, although he bad fre• goody hen the defendant at the honk, and in their conplftyl be never law any thing of too great fa milmAty,hetween them ; on the contrary, there ra ther be kir appeared to be a difiance ; be never was more forprifed in his life-time than when he heard of the elopement. He faw the plaintiff the next day. and,frequepdy fince. The event had certainly caufed a great agitation of his fpirits. pre his crofswaamination, he faid, the defendant was entitled to property, which is now in Chancery, to the value of about soca. The ages of tbsparties are, the plaintiff about forty, his wife foloewhat turn ed of thirty, and the defendant about meaty-four. Mrs: Dudley had lived as waiting.womaa in the plaintiff's family for the hit eight years; the never during that time obferved any thing improper be tween the defendant and the plaintiff's wife, nor ever fufpeaed any thing criminal between them. On the Lath of March Mrs. Smith left the plaintiff's houfe ; on the day before there bad been lonic company to charier ' and Mrs . Smith. being unwell, retired from table. end went into the many ; her hufband loon followed her. and relied her affwaionately to take a glare of wise. which Ote reftalkd ; be alto wanted to lead fee medical *Stance, which alto Ike declined. She went to bed that night at ten oPeloak. and the winters to underftand that the was enga to `'bend the next morning with hCfs Bolton, o ; the next morning the came again into the nurfery, kited the yossopfk child feveral times, and bid bet take care of its between ten and eleven the west out, giving direaions that if the did not return by (even o'cloek, they &sold fend a coach for hit; he never faw her fusee; her miftrefs was pregnant at the time of bee eliment. On cravenusination, the declared the never ob. *reed any particular partiality between the defendant and Mrs. Smith: they walked once or twice og 7rer to the theatre, and two or three times t in paying evening vifits to their acquaintances. The is of the hoofs talked a little of their being fo enact together, but it did not lirikr her as spy Ong extraordinary. On being re-examined, he hid, the never law a fonder or more affectionate hatband. John Hayward raid, he was employed to purfue the defendant. tie let out on the a i ft of March, and faw them at Edinburgh on the :Sib. He lodged oppofite them for about three weeks, and afterwards eon vetted wit! the planar, from whom, assetell aifaint his own oblervation, he learned that they cohabited together. There. was but one bed in the lodging.l they had taken. Helearnt alto that Mrs. Smith mif carried in Edinburgh. Mr. Price, a Magiftrate in the neighbourhood of Birmingham, knew the:plaintiff for many years, and had always eonfidered him as a molt affeCtionate hut . - band and good character. He vifited often at the houfe, and law every appearance of domeftic heppi. nefs. He was never more furprifed than when he heard of this elopement. Mr. ERSKINB laid, he could produce many more witneffes, but he thought it would be wafting the time of the Court to go into any farther proof. Mr. Cum.'s, on the part of the defendant, Rated that he felt extremely the difficulty he had in full:fin ing his client's cafe, when the fire abilities of the bar were employed againft him,and when he was to fptak in mitigation of the enormity of a crime which had been fo ably painted on the other fide. He Mould, however, contend moll decidedly, that a jury fitting to award a compenfation in damages, had nothing to do with the enormity of the guilt on the part of the defendant. If the law is defeaive in the point, by not affording a mode of puniffiing the crime of adulteryas a rnifdemea nor,and onl y allowing an altion fordamages fußained, this defea in the law could not be cured at the pleafure of a jury. They had no queftion to rj,, but what fum ought to be awarded as a compena" Lion in damages to the perfon complaining of an in jury? The cafe that he was inftruaed he fhould be able to prove was, that there had been fo marked an attachment between the defendant and the plaintiff's wife, for a long time, that he ought not to have (of fered the defendant to continue fuch a conflant vi fitor, and that he fhould, either by gentlenefs or au thority, have refrained his wife, and faved her from ruin, and himfelf from the misfortune which. had fince befallen him. If it Mould appear that he was culpably remifs in (offering this great intimacy to have fubtifted fo long, in allowing fuch frequent op portunities to the defendant, a mere boy, at that time not above twenty-two, be conceived it muft very much leten the damages a Jury would otherwife give. How this cafe would turn out upon the evi dence he &mold produce, he was not prepared to fay, and he was afraid to flats fads Rrongly, which, per haps, the witneffes would not confirm. He would, however, produce a letter from the plaintiff to his wife, which would prove that he had intended to fe parate from her, and told her the next.poft mould convey this refolution to her friends. This letter proved that his comfort was defiroyed before the elopement. The firft witnefa called on the part of the Defen dant was a Mr. Bracken, who was married to a filter of Mr. Smith's, and lived at Moor Green, at a Own diftance from Birmingham. Mrs. Smith ufed fre quently to vifit there in Jan. 18w, and from that till March; the was often accompanied by the Defendant. The fire of there vifits was to fee a fick brother of hers, who died in the witnefs's hook ; they never, however, Raid late in the evening ; he rem:Meets a converfation between the Plaintiff. aad his wife in his Mrs. at the warehoufe , in Birmingham, when Smith complained to her bulkand, that Hits Bracken (the Defendant's filter) had mentioned to the Defendant, that the great auentios between him aad Mr. Smith were much obferved. Ms... Smith, at the Clone time, cried bitterly. and Aid; if Ihe had not one of the belt of hullatods, Inch mien would nuke her miferable i the thought it weld be lard that the might not be allowed to have the attentions of fo near a relation without a foandaL To which complaint her hatband replied, " do sot main yow -1 Pelf nneafy, it is all ridiculous talk s as you, may be Cure I do not believe a word of it,' I bops he, will continue to be as auentive to you, as ufual.' , This witnefs (aid, he had Moat( obferved a fetnilitinkr that he thought improper.. bat did no o ttafra it had come to any thing criminal, end tisongbt a woe Apo delicate a fubjea zo saensioa to thejlaintilt, . Being crofs-examined u he Aid, headset the lull radon to fuppofe that the Plabstitheilmintbarbour ed a fufpicion of any thing oriaasele. eilvdmase , lad ' converfations with hint about ihe nottEß*o ble lan latterly, and has not is doubt is bis windbag' thashis ,alisaation of her aireaions from bar hitibeadorilidl r r aeafad his nnhappinefs, was produstdaserely.by the ..crieninal attentions and forduaion el the Defendant a 'he knew the Plaintiff to be a moft • affsaimmte WC band and father, and a very simnel* teed. .miner' kredi no pleafure but at house. lines this bellblefs, boiwever, his happinets hes been entirelt. delbeted. ~ Mr. Bird laid, he vifited at the family ofeba.7l•l*- 'tiff, and for the laft two yeses there appeared to him N be too much mutation to-ehe plaintiff' on die s i= ei Mrs. Smith ; he..bovrever. did not thee .atty liana crintingith hilt thou tin there appeared a grows.ls al the advantages- of nf Plano in the *Rd it Ws. Smith, filch as, peafrequent opportunities, ab d. ,x pottbly lead to the event which has now hap- Beirg crate...sunned, fetid he was fare the ' tit never harboured a fulpicioo of his wife : he was one of the laft men in the world that would have connived at his own difhonour & be always confidered him a aloft exemplary hatband, and indeed, a model of per iety. XS Bird has known die Phititit end his wife, vi le feeds fince their mania end before it. She admit. ted Th e might in eottverfation have made sib fervations to the aintiff on the impropriety of per '.asitting ftrong friendfitips betwesta, fingle men and married Wlllatli 3 but, if the Paid fo, de fpoitagelsei rally, without any idea of alisding to his. Oldies: examination, the raid, Ike never in her life law a bets ter hatband or father than the Plaintiff, sad the bad ,always foam of bins in that light. All the witaetes on both fides agreed that they be lieved she alteration of Mrs. Smith s condua latterly, both to her hatband and children, arafe merely ham her guilty attachment to the Defendant. The letter was then read from the Plaintiff te Ids wife, mentioning &parades. This letter wpm ex. treasely long, and written in a molt *teammate Rile. It was a ftrong remon (trance from every confideradon which his affsaion, her duty to her children. her ctn. raaer, and her happinefs both here and hereafter, could fiaggeft, to induce her to change Per cozdnet, and be again a good wife and mother. The latter was well deferibed by Lord Eeesunaoue it as ewer tier airwine pings lie liftmen mild With our for . Pi 10 16 f ' • lam ir 11or• ,Tfla letter will (covey the dlittelre a my said. was my hasp am a• that I eau find le Mese ars& 711. Is prieNyes he Ihme *NI SW vet al+ &C. you, for I tan hardly entertain a raw at hope that my A/cr y-a:ions, which have been fo rep..atedly difregarded, wid make any impreffivin on your mind; howascr, I think it a duty I .we to you, to myfelf, and our daddies, the common Aka' of our care, to endeavour, if potfible, to difpet the norm which threaten. to Molt upon you, and reader us all unhappy. Confider thee how you ondanga your own happinefs. However.at the prefeut moment 'tau may defpife the opinion of your relations and fame, friends, De affurcd that the time will come, if you cad °lithe proteaion of your affeCbmate hatband, that you will molt hartilv repent your preterit raikanduiff, to which alone it will be owing, if you are now repeated from ate. As to thole remarkable ideas that you have copra's.' as loving fotitude, be anted of this, the pkafurcs of fo litude arc merely chimerical, and would very ill replace the tender affeetice of your huthand, and the duties of a mother. As a hut. band, lean matt folcnmly appeal to Goo, that it ham ever been the ifrongdt with at thy heart to fie you hippy, and had it pleated Providence that we mould live longer together, fuck would dill be my brit with and endeavour. ffut if my endeavours mould be ineffeaual, you Zooid at lead confider your children. Can you bear that they ball be always aftlided when they think of their miforable unhappy mother t When I complain in this manner of your general conduct, and point out to you the contemn:sees it mutt produce, do not fuppofc I mean to impute to you any perfo nal criminality. The heft proof I can give that 1 harbour no fuck fufpicions, is, that I now addrefs you. Independent army (itch futpiciao, I have matter fuiliciently (aims to urge aga, you. —Why do you deny me thole rights phkk Goo and sum have given the marriage Rate t Can you rapport that any man can ho contented to live with his wife, enjoying only the mere name of Intiband t You midi therefore think that reparation mutt be the emlequence of your raik.onduCL I mutt therefore ware you of the difgrace and ruin Which mutt betel you in cafe of our reparation, and I mutt again recall to your mind the particulars of your mit canduet. Initead of !hewing the lead contrition for what is pea, you teem to be astray. watching opporttlaines td give ma finds provocatious--hardly any thing eau actor that TM do no u tr re tr agalnft me as charges of extravagance, tyramsy, and iaja I have many friends that know am lonlinately, and have known me long I can rarely and coaldo appeal to them whether diterrt thole attehtioes. But, ftippoftec I did d&xve them, is it the part cia wife tot* my canna* awake Bat, to pats over every conaderatioo of my loniser% owl even of your's, without mentioning any thing of the ties of alhition. or door former hap pinch, 1 matt appeal to your feelings as a modier.whether Toucan b-ar not only the contempt of your children, but the r ft scoffs (aims they make wild! yen for the catinetion at protpeds in fits f May may well fay, their meeker by her mill:coda* fetter ed their Woes mind sad hie mations, and prevented them fowl receiving the patrimony which t ay had a right to cape* from a ferber's cart. Are you prepared to hoer this grooved ? Your childtas arc now growing up; sad are of an ice to make °brava ! thew. Baldwin (the eideft fa) has made °bravadoes. I have no ds* Win se urge, bet tameeroure pad met convey to you* [fields the sews of the feperation which you have fo ohm de. manded. How weft your frieeds,hars will the Deitor (her brother) fed, when he heirs that his lam km Gs degraded haodf ha to leave her kteleeed sod her children ? (Thie we melee to oar Readers Ms Sart Maple or doe of the molt Welting letters that we can remember to have bond read ] MIS letter was produced, on the part of the defen dant, to blew that be had talked of Imitation, pre. T _ violas to the elopement. - Mr. Emirs role in teplyi and was evidently Co affetted with the cafe, and with the letter which had il been jail read, as to be hardly capable of freaking ; he at length ezpre&d lifdf as follows: " What ever I doll fay in reply, mull be inoft weak in tom. parifon of what you have now heard t—yriit have , heard the language of that behead, and that fattier. 1 I cannot feel is ffrongly as be ; and yet I declare 1 I never was, is my life, more allotted with any cafe that came before me than the prefent." The Lawn- 1 ed Counfd then perfettly agreed *kb Mr. Cad* the Counfel for the defesdent, that it was ent.their ' province to pobilli the moral relief the olfealling party, but only to give compass:inn is Ismit to tbe injured. He regretted with hisLeennedgekad, t , that there was fuch a deb: no lima* km %Able Wye.% that the grata of allpetiblethifdthesmisei , . . not be ptuutbsd as a insfsbibmonr, hat ad, • - ; by a civil affirm. He flisuld that prat ail • !• • of moral derpayseacy. aid pelilk w ilt of the qaekhaisalfAhoeild,pal. iserldel • leth as sroatkla=tetons 'Mew ire , ' Aioshi indeed. lidmoolti St& diskay pen disk 44ba • they .belleoeifical. woubLemopenfate the yllikeilfifordie • =V i a . kukoisaut in the total weak, opiu hit • • I If any.other fort of obsl ONO 4 elsittesielki. if say perfoo galas freas ; spa a* plekaforeintes.ll • ,• a pittsrer 0r; 1 y th t#44011 1 ,44 0 4440... b. re lOW Theism Rated io die rem& • peek* ad agallive •T so stilakair.4oolllll4ollo.l4oobika o sac Otisetwaftis to IPSO mai* asiebt items soslitoodeso that it god& brelin ips - lap if C awn *mid *di* a vsipimad-stee .his hoofs, that &chit Pa l* foli oi es a l or children•vad thus fay-•v" Ima iterilb ailkallor what can you net from me 1" lie malt eillsorries in ether cafes, IriamPrifenigisa.• ... The* 026 ' Etlkaa . • was at great lesigtklital in the Aw stet animated and eloquent : be Oily tide:woe fart up as a very higitaggravailos otiose. Lord Eiiswioaouu a delivered to flee iota Juse able charge. in the courfe of which, sineag many ' ensiles things, his Lorrithip .braved to the Jury, , bent this waso p s of the MA 041/1411111011iteitil injury, as be tNpikt, that wet woe piaresunel v Plaintiff complained of the greed injury. ' be &Rained in domeltie lifer sad it was done. ria:m eg bat pedal who. of A amakind. to • it, sad who owed his the :or . 1 for it appeased that the Melotiff had taken pj,tha Doi iylmit sietplum. oftheage of. szoseloakt t .. fu !run his ebildlood. s and Pm iliti. , • I seapolosed him into lifer and piano in s •Sroy of molthig his femme. The rotors for k. 01 Ite thrill's:l6ff of th e adisilielt milk wife, and of her honour, worths vaia ewavated ett e to heroin fee ling thateotddise conindatid i fociety. Ho was attended.to by the_Platadif 1 y hlatiacfs all his life-tise, and die alma garsiZe for it was skdspriva it T li kenefatter of all the m M melon which I agni .Is its Sate of thingsr the foals Oki* loci *mild have to decide NW. . *lra hi the afe to mitigate. in say ad that ought to =h e fall upon him, d wild *s was entitled to receive for Inch eo_ispitr sod as this. It was laid that the Pb ought he hate teen the af. &Ilion which was growing op bathes the Defen dant and the Plaintiff's *de i but k sus proved that nothlail_sfreand Witt Wok. tint blight to alarm the filipielalt of a sea of beam' I tad et wits t• he obferved, that a sea of bassesed iamb as the Phandff was proved to be, woe die la* ilea to be libely to (aped - that. inch a rufous si the Deiessiant• who °god him fir spas, ollligetions. einald at all difhonoveldni ; thithe was the lail Mu likely to dif cover the d4race Olds wife ; but if die Ju r y found the led any blameable indifference for the vir tue of his wife ; if they found that the Pl a i n tiff b a d, by the Imperfeltion of his condo& towards his wife. which his Lordthip laid be did not fee upon the ■