Star. — London, England, 1821-01-23 00:00:00

SALISBURY SESSIONS. In our Paper of the 20th of November, we gave a detailed account of the illumination in Salisbury i and of the conduct of some of the Magistrates on that occasion. The proceedings were resumed on Thursday se'nnight,at the Sessions, before the MAYOR, the DZPUTY-RECORDER, and a Bench of City Jus tices. It will be recollected, that we then stated that the illumination was general; there were but few ex ceptions, and even those were rather defective in point of time than intention. The only person who gave notice of his intention to oppose the common sentiments of his fellow-citizens was the brother of the Recorder (Mr. TINNEY), who is Clerk to SirJOHN LEACH, one of the Milan Commissioners. Several persons were accused of riot on the occa sion referred to, and were committed to prison. The greater part were bailed, and the trial of the whole was fixed for the Sessions, which opened last Thurs day.—One of the parties who had been the principal • occasion of the little disturbance that did take place, had been incessantly engaged, through the medium of one of the County Papers, under a fictitious name, in attempting to inflame the minds of the inhabit ants, and indeed of the county, against the persons whose conduct was to be brought before a Jury of their countrymen: he pronounced our city to be in a state of revolution—our Clergy and our Magis trates deposed—while at the very moment there were no less than eight of them sitting ij,judgment, and -that too, as they afterwards discovered, upon a ques tion beyond their jurisdiction! To the honour of the jurisprudence of this country, and the virtuous feeling of the better informed, such arts are unavailing, and the base sacrifice of principle, in the hope of obtain ing place, returned empty! The drama, however, was well got up, and though there are no less than fifteen Attornies in the city, yet none of them could be procured, or were consi dered adequate to produce the much-wished catas ttoplie. Mr. CUITTY, of Shaftesbury, was there . . lore employed to conduct the prosecution, with Mr. l'oonszn, Attorney, of Andover. The accused ap plied to Mr. WA RDZN, of the Close, and he, knowing the poverty of their situation, kindly undertook to appear for them. Prom amongst a population of 7,000 persons, there were but six individuals found in the least diSorderly, the oldest of whom was twenty-six year; of age, the others horn eighteen to twenty-one. Of these only one has been convicted, and on the following evidence: Silas Daft) was indicted for a riot and breach of the peace, and also for a common assault. James Hayes deposed, that he was a Special Constable on the 16th November; that on the evening of that day, between the hours of seven and eight o'clock, he took John Sweet into ens- ' trAly far what tn: crasceivcd to be a breach of the peace; there WAS a riot on that night; saw the prisoner with sev e ral hun dreds more; there was a mote dari.?g outrnze. lie leaped across his arms, as if to beak his Ito:d of Sweet; Sworn, a Sub-Con- stable, was with I:6n when a• wilted ; he struck him awn!, with I Lis stick , hut .1 r...t know wlietir.:r :Sworn had struck him be fore that time; h.r wa sure the pri a bavr was the man that struck him; he rt.,61 not be on,.taken. • Crobt.erupained by Mr. Waunsay.—Was a Special Constable on the nigh: 1:1-questton ; had his staff of office with him, and a label on nis hat, on which was printed ais•e;',/ il,lestabie; is ..ore the prisoner must have seen this label, at lea,: it was 11 - gbc enouzlit for him to see it—it was so light, that he could s,e a sirpence un the grOund ; it w..s in the middle of the Maria-plice; it was extremely light ; there was a bright moon; neari7 500 persons, and abaft: thirty 4tiweird Constables was iint at I.lr time, dues mg limos , what a riot exactly is; there was a confusion, of ill de ttizta —an illumination; the people were talking in the street; the illuminactu was partial; they were breaking people's windows; the prisoner Was amongst th , .. number; but before witness struck hint be said nothing to witness, nor saltness to hint. lie did not teU the prisoner he was a Constable; could not swear that Sworn struck hint before the assault. William Sr..orn deposed, that wben he went up to James Hayes, he had the pn :otter in custody; he ikeught there was an attempt at rescue ; the person atu niptins to rescue Sweet was unknown to butt ; cannot ssvvar it was the titan at the bar; saw a number of persons assaubled tozethcr, but could not swear that he was amongst them. • . _ _ Cr is a rwnirred 6y : fr. NI/Amin:l.—Was not certain of the per son of the !irisaner ; it tea,: la der, that, even after he hari ho? I of him, he could nut diringuisla who it was; it uses dark, &Yr, 4!ark ; add see ki pick up sispcnc.: in the stmt . ; does not think the moon shone; it did mit 5e . )4 . 1? , ! ; there were isi lamps lighted, and only from four to five houses illuminated in the rlarket-place; was on the other ski.. of &mixt, hut did uot know him at the time; when the prisoner came up, he did not know hi.n ; it was so dark, that he Mild not see who the prisoner was ; he knock.sl Lim down, but did not take particular uotire that there was any riot. Mr. Nodding, Town Cleik, was called to prove that the moon was shining on the night of the ut November. lle stated, from the City Regulations with respect to the lighting of lamps, that there must have been a moon on that evening, and produced an almanack, to spew that his statement was correct.— No person in Court doubted the exigence of the moon, but it was one of Sylvesto Dagger:woes 1 it was " moon behind a cloud," and was not Irons under that cloud till two hours after the riot and as:tart/I took - -place. Besides, it is very surprising that it never oc curred to. Mr. CHITTY himself, that, though the City was regulated by the Moods, with respect to lighting the lamps, that the Moon was under nopar ticular 'obligation to be regulated by the Cilli! But there is no man wise at all times! Mr. Illackmore deposed, that he was a special constable on the night in question; he saw a crowd, and a man its a smock frock ; believes the prisoner to he the man ; the crowd were noisy ; he saw the constable knock the man dawn ; saw hint af terwards in the Council House; his head was bleeding. Cress-ezirinintd ky Mr. WAaorx.—There were a number of personi wearing amuck-frocks as well as the prisoner. There were a few houses illuminated, and others lighting ; he could rot distinguish faces in the crowd, it was so extremely dark; bet having seen the man's head bleeding, and knowing that a may bad been knocked down, he judged that he was the person. Mr. WAnuss then addressed the Jury.—" Gentle- Men, you have heard the whole of the evidence in this important case ' and a fine collection of evidence it is. I declare that there is not one tittle of it worthy of going to a Jury. You, Gentlemen, have s most probably. been all in the situation of the prosecutor, as special constables, and may, therefore, be sup. posed to have. a feeling hostile to persons in the pri soner's.situation, and charged with his offence. But of all such feelings I hope you will endeavour to divossess your minds, and. look only at the evidence as tt stands before you, abstracted from every other consideration. Now it appears that, on the 16th of jiorember, an illumination had been ad ver ti se d to celebrate ;he defeat of the Bill of Pains and Pe nalties-- __ Reccnder TINNET--" I can't—l can't—l can't, in deed, allow you to mention that—you must not !" Mr. W ARMN Good GOD, Sir, am I not to be allowed to state to the Jury in what way this prase. ctitioa origituttcdt Am 1 not to inform the Jury the alleged offrnee was under . what cii committed r Recorder TitaNser--.-es Yes, yes, yes, you may, in any other way ; but yOu must not, must not say any thing, in,what you do say, about the subject you have just mentioned." Mr. WARDEN—" Then, it seems, that I am to say everything but the thing I ought to say, merely ,be cause it is unpleasant to the feelings —" Recorder TINNEY—" You must, must not speak in that way." Mr. WARDEN—" As an advocate for the prisoner, I am entitled to use every means. in my power to ex culpate him from the charge of which he stands ac cused, and I consider the interruption I receive as !richly improper and —" "Recorder TINNEY — " You must not use that lan page ; I can't, can't allow it." Mr. WARDEN—" Then, Gentlemen, I must turn your attention to the evidence of Hayes. He tells you that he was a special constable, and if a consta ble, in the day time, shews you his staff, it is evi deuce of his authority, and to assault him in the exe cution of his duty is a most heinous offence. lint the law wisely distinguishes between the periods in which the constable may be called upon to exercise his duty. Thus, for instance, if called upon in the night, he must inform the parties that he is a con gable, the shewing of his staff is not sufficient, for it may be so dark that it may not be distinguishable from another staff, and therefore no certain evidence of his authority ; therefore, 1 contend, upon this ound, that the indictment cannot be sustair.ed.— The prisoner stands indicted for an assault on the person of a constable, and with an attempt to rescue, he knowing, at the same time, that he was a constable. Here, Gentlemen, lies the gravamen of the offence.— But does the prisoner know that Hayes is a consta ble ? 0 yes,' says Master Hayes. Rut how?— U, I bad my staff!' Why, so had I a staff, but I was not a special ronstable! Well, then, how is the prisbner to discover the office and authority of Hayes? Why, he has a label is his hat! A label in Lis hat, and on which were printed, Special Constable! what does all this amount to? Why, that he never told Sweet, or his friend the prisoner, as the law re quires, that he was a constable, but that he had a staff, which nobody could distinguish from another, and a label in his hat, which no person could read, for it was so dark, so very dark, so extremely dark, as constables Sworn and Blackmore inform you, that they could not, though near the prisoner, and though they had hold of him, at all recognize his features. This was the season when Master Hayes would have you believe, that in the middle of Salisbury Market place, three or four hundred people, and the prisoner in the midst of them, were to an ive at the knowledge of his - office by reading the label in his hat! lie swears that it was light enough to ec a sixpence in the street. Ido not impute wilful and corrupt per jury to Hayes, that, in order to secure his object. in coming forward he has stept a little aside from the. paths of truth, but one thing I will say, that his evidence stands completely contriaicted by the testi many of the other witnesses fbr the prosecution. One ur the other must have sworn falsely : you cannot be lieve both. would have set the matter at rest, if Hayes had actually seen a sixpence in the street; and svcuid have afforded still stronger confirmation of the amazing lightness Of the night, if had picked it up, and, alter having carefully conveyed it to his pocket, had now produced it in Court. You will consider, Gentlemen, how much the testimony of such a man is deserving of your credit, where he is not supported by less suspicious testimony. Ile swears that there was a riot ; that there were three hundred persons assembled ; and that he was in the midst of thirty special conssbles. When I asked him what a riot was, he informed me be could not tell what a riot extr:a . ,/ was: thefe was a confusion—an ill de sign—an Illurination\—the people were ta.'lth:g—they were bretg:ing people's leindores ! This is his account of a riot. What a :iot! Amoagst three hundred per sons, there is only one, at the most two, that were committit:g anything like a breach of the peace!— The prisoner was seen doing nothing ; he was,break ing no windows. Hayes swears he was not even so much as speaking; for, he said, before he came up, the prisoner said nothing whatever to Hayes, Hayes to him. Where, then, lies his offence?- -Lt the fluctuations of such a body, the prisoner, who, remember, all this time. knew nothing of Hayes being a Constable, i‘ as pushed against his arm, and he having a bargain already in his hand, and which he much feared the loss of,.immediately makes use of his staff, as a sort of summary way of giving him information that he was a special Constable; and Master Sworn, who did not even see who was the ob ject of his venge:u seconded the motion by promptly knocking him down. Now, Gentlemen, you have heard the whole of this man's offence, you have seen his treatment, he was breaking no win dows, he committed no assault, he attempted 'no riot, he attempted no rescue, he did not even speak, be has been punished most severely, he has. been im prisoned nearly two months, and will carry the proofs of Messrs. Hayes and Sworn's authority with him to the grave. Remember the oath that you have taken, it is to give a verdict according to the evidence—all private, all party feeling must give place to this paramount obligation. !'rusting that you will be guided by this and this alone, I confi dently anticipate the acquittal of the prisoner." The Recoriont informed the Jury that the charge was fully proved, and they immediately returned a verdict of Guilty. John Gast was indicted for having committed a riot and breach of the peace, on the evening of the Ifith November last. Mr. CHITTY in opening the pleadings stated, that ' William Weavings was a special constable on the evening mentioned in the indictment, and that having seized a prisoner, he was conducting him before a Magistrate, when the defendant Gast assaulted him in the execution of his duty. An attempt to commit a rescue was an assault ; and if the Jury should be of that opinion, they must, on hearing th e story o f Weavings, find the prisoner guilty. William Were** was is New-street ea the night of the 16th, was a 'pedal eostable, went out of his awn house, saw meaty or thirty payou t they were very quirt, went on tow ar d s M rs . Hovey 's, which is the corner of the street, saw a boy throw a doe, wok Ma into custody, the prisoner came up and said he knew the boy, thd he would be if ha should ta k e hi m into goody i_he oohed the whom several doss, mut eadaa. vented to i ll Zia sway. Did Mt know the boy he had in custody. restivismilwil by Mr. Weaealo-lktittli, tie Ogee; as he . . Was pushing him ; in St. Thomas's Chtwelsoyard there were several hands struck him; had the boy then in custody, and was taking him to the Alarket-place, where he was eventually rescued.. Within three minutes afterwards be saw the prisour ; he had followed him from New-street, but used no insulting heguage towards him: there were other persons pushing hint as well u the prisoner. Mr. WARDEN.—" Gentlemen of the Jury, the de fendant stands indicted for a riot on the night of the 16th of November ; two or three persons must be as sembled together, with an intent to attempt some en terprise of a private nature, against any who shall oppose them. There must, be force and violence used; but this is not enough to constitute a riot, it must be such a species of force and‘iolence as creates terror. The injury or grievance complained of, and intended to be revenged by such means, must relate to some private quarrel only, and in no way con nected with the Public. Now, this being the case, there was no cause of a private nature to call any persons together on that night ; it is not attempted to shew that there was ; it arose entirely out of a pub• lic question ; it was a public affair, and, therefore, can in no way be twisted into the crime charged in the indictment. I am far from being desirous of imputing any thing like a wilful desire in Mr. Weav ings to mislead the Jury. I do not think he meant to swear falsely. Mr. Weavings might have been pushed by somebody ; there is no doubt but he was; for amongst a crowd of thirty or forty persons, all pressing upon each other, it is scarcely possible but 'Mr. Weavings, like most of the others, n:ight have received a push. You have it from most respectable testimohy, that the night was dark, very dark, ex tremely dark. Mr. Weavings did not know the boy he had in custody ; lie cannot swear that the pri• soner even struck him, and confesses, that there were other persons pushing as well as the prisoner. This is his testimony, and on which you are to find your verdict. I cannot !sting myself to believe, that the witness intends to swear falsely. No; it is one of the sunny mistakes of that night: but, unless I am misin formed, I shall be able to prove to you, that it was Weavingthimself that struck the blow, aye, and that, too, before one act of aggression had been committed, or even one word had passed between the parties, more thaii this, the prisoner said,' that is not the boy, Mr. Weavings, who threw the stone.' Without con. descending to make a reply, or come to the least ex planation, Mr. Weavings immediately knocks him down, and there lett him bleeding. On his exami nation in chief, Mr. Weavings told you that the pri soner swore at him; on his cross-examination, he says, that he did not use any insulting language. Swearing, then, I suppose, is not insulting language! The fact is, my client had no more to do with insult ing or assaulting Mr. Weavings than you or I, Gen tlemen, and that I will prove to you." Mr. Wannes then called three persons, who con firmed the facts as stated by him. They severally' stated, that their meeting was quite accidental: one of them had been with the prisoner for half an hour he fore they came up to the prosecutor, and that during the whole time, the prisoner had done nothing offen sive to hini, and never gave him a blow. The RECORDER charged the Jury, and informed them that the assault and rescue were clearly proved, and the Jury acquitted the prisoner. There was another indictment against Gast, for assaulting Leonard Jesse, on the same night. The' same sort of evidence was adduced here as on the former trial. Jesse declared that the prisoner did not even say an unpleasant word. There was a sow—a bustle—a hallooing—the prisoner did not push him, did not strike him—did nothing offensive that he, could see ; in fact, did nothing ! Such was the evi dence adduced, and after the Recorder had, as in the former case, given an opinion that the charge was made out, the Jury acquitted the prisoner. The ver dict called forth a burst of applause, from all parts of the Court ; which was censured by the RECORDER. lienry Taylor was put to the Bar, charged with the same offence ; on which Mr. CHITTY informed the Jury, that this case was one which could leave no doubt on their minds of the guilt of the prisoner, and of the enormity of his offence. The heinous nature of his crime (said I , ss) is distinguished from all those who have been at this Bar on a similitcharge. They, Gentlemen, were unarmed # but he, bent on double missiiief, was armed with a ponderous bone! Ile was not only armed with this instrument of terror and death, but was acting most riotously, most noisily, and vociferating K ith the lungs of a Stentor. I have only to prove this, and then taking it in connection with his being armed, and in company with other persons, I shall be assured of your verdict of guilty. Call George Atkinson, and as to all that Mr. Warden has to say, it will not weigh one feather in the scale." George Atkinson, on the evening of the 16th Novegriber, ob vrvtd from 50 to no persons together near the White hart Inn. They were going by Mr. Hussey's house, in New-street ; they were conducting themselves in a riotous manner, so much so that he aunt/a there was a probability of a breach of the peace ; he thought their object was to break the windows; heard the noise of breaking windows. Cress-ezansissrsi 8y Mr.• WAR/MlL—There were several Special Constables there; ran after the peo?le ; heard windows break ing in the direction of Mr. Hussey s house. Saw the prisoner, took him, saw him in the act of jumping up and throwing, sprang upon his back and they fell together, there were no lights up, could not see hint s presumes it was him; heard distinctly the noise of breaking windows, perhaps for half a minute; did not hear the name of any particular house mentioned, conceited that Mr. Iluswy's windows were broken, had every reason to think so, be should imagine so, but it was impossible for him to say. Francis Wills (another witness) was a Special Constable on the evening alluded to; saw a number of persons in New -street, it was between the hours of six and ten, there might be from 50 to 70, they were kicking up a row, he considered it rioting,' the prisoner was amongst them, saw the defendant's arm ext e nd e d as if to throw a stone towards Mr. Ilussry's house, saw Mr. At kinson seize him, hasgno doubt but the prisoner was the person who broke them. Mr. CuirrY--ig Mr. Recorder, this is my case." Mr. WARDEN-" And a pretty case it is !—Gentle men of the Jury, when I heard my Learned Friend's opening, I could not help (to use the phrase of one of his witnesses, and by wh;ch phrase he intends to prove his case) I could not help presuming that there were deeds to be unfolded at which human nature must shudder, and confirmed by proof even much stronger than Holy Writ itself. Then, indeed, what I might venture to have said, could not have weighed so heavy as a feather, and my Learned Friend would have gained his cause as easily as he is now going to lose it." 1 Mr. Currrii—‘ 4 I never said, that what you said would not weigh as light as a feather." RECORDER" Words of that kind were made use of." Mr. CHITTY—a Then I ask Mr. Warden's pardon." Mr..WAnnot--.." It is granted.—Now, Gentlemen fof the het, hi en tare ap bat littl e al lin commenting upon this case—it is its On meat. I ask you if,.in the whole evidence, ihert' one fact established: if there is one act s t ,„: What says Mr. Atkinson ? Then were persons conducting themselves in a I iotous they were riotous; and then he says, that being riotous, he only :considered that their probability of a breach of the pea c e; mighty fabric of guilt, which was to by Mr. George Atkinson, falls to the ground, goes on to state that he thought—=he Mow* object was to break windows; here you thoughts instead of the prisoner's actions!► lent evidence for A Jury ! He then say s , . the prisoner in the act of jumping up an, ing; I sprang upon his back, and we b ot h together: So far so good—but what He adds, There were no lights up, and I see him, but I presume it was him. This, , good evidence for a Jurp—the presumptio4 Atkinson respecting. a man whom he could mg Thus the fabric which his Learned F, tend 114:1 had crumbled into dust! It had cniiveited iw thoughts, probabilities, and considerativ, s ! comes Mr. Wills, and he gives you kis tion of a riot, mingled with his ricubts atru LL derations ! And this is all upon which ,041 4 ,, return a verdict of Guiity ! Had the ntei7 been produced, that would have certainly stantial evidence; but i suppose that it has: more usefully employed. ' Gentlemen, it i, mp g *, ble but you must acquit the ptisoner. There proof of riot against him, unless doubts, tions, probabilities, and presumptions, u21%4 0, deuce. 1 leave my client in your hand-, that you w ill do i.inl substantial justice." The ItccintoEit here read the Statute i f IL observed, that though tl:e law had defined it to meeting of persons unlawfully assembied on private enterprize, yet it %%as impossible not case to see, that it assumed the folni of question ; for with the p•ivate entdreilze were connected, an attack on the Constitited Andtuilw i; and, as the evidence f ully establishec the of the prisoner in the transaction, he Jolt to decide upon the guilt or innocence of tile Mr. Wannest," Sir, I take the 'Alec gesting, before the case goes to the liry, there has been the least tittle of evidence that any person had been terrified by the the prisoner"—(No reply.) The Jury returned a verdict of—Aot Mr. CHITTY then stepped up to the Rezo , ' whispered something to him, on winch round to the Jury, and desired them to their verdict, adding, " Evidence of *noise and is quite sufficient proof of riot, and not whether , Boner was actively engaged in making that tumult; yet if he was there it is an evidence being concerned in the transaction." The Jury again returned a verdict of Ai and the cheering, both in and out of Court, deafening The Town Clerk ordered the gallery cleared, but there was no person taken into — James Coombs, and three others,. were with similar offences; and on their being. Mr. HODDING if they could pay their fees, amounted to £3 Is. Bd. they were informed r' could-not take their trials, they might go al business; and their Bail were told that cognizances would be estreated. The lit however, with great consideration, observed, it was a nev, case, they should be respited Sessions, when the parties might probably be, to pay the fees of the Court. This intimation peared to satisfy all parties. [On the Monday following, however, was issued by W. DYKE, Esq. the Mayor, four persons were apprehended on the ground they had not appeared to plead to Me isidiziamt, although they had all appeared, and weie all roil to take their trials, their poverty being the only teal. why they could not be given in charge to the Jul' They were conveyed to the County Jail, where they will have to remain in the cells (unless bailed oat) until next October! that being the time for gra holding the City Sessions.] Monday sennight, the mouth of the Spinial coal-pit, near Sheffield, suddenly gave way, and for men were buried under the ruins. Saturday evening, as Mi ss Hott. IN( d Draper-terrace, Paddington New-road, was ing her dress at the ctrawing-room chitin preparatory to going to Covent-Garden Ti part of it caught tire, and she was it a blaze. A young Lady named SHAWN, who dressing in the next room, alarmed by her flew to her assistance, and threw a large cloak her, which probably saved her life, but she • in excruciating agony. Iler hair was burnt fro:lilt head, in which part she suffered most. Mi,s Stoll also sustained much injury about the hands and Mil The Hambledon Hounds have been particularly lie since the breaking up of the frost, having killed three of' times they have been out. The pack met on Friday, at * Castle Down, and found a foe in Rough Hay, which, • Ae • most brilliant run of one hour and a quarter, at the close dor_ the hounds ran into him in vi e w, was killed near Ilorndese , presence of a numerous field olsportsmen, who returned MO highly gratified. CHASE BY Sae Jecoa A,ii.zy's Sus Housam—Saturday night, an out-lying deer started from Tatterford floe It* and ran. through Broomsthorpe ; here, for a few minutes: hounds were at fault, but recovering, took off for Cot Heath, challenging through a hni open country to Boo" where he was headed; be then made off for Houghton Put, touching on Harpley, from thence to Kippon Heath, and WO taken in grand style at Paafield, after a famous run of rig. hours and a quarter. BIRTHS. • At •Corfu, on the 18th of December, the Lady of Linea/S I PoMilos, of the Bth Regirner.t of Foot, of a son and beau. At• Old Alresford, on Monday se'nnlght, the Lady of the BA Colonel Onslow, of a son. MARRIP.D. • Monday sennight, at Dumfti..l, Captain J. Carson, of the**, Dumfries, to Miss Jean Yorkstoun, of that • - DIED. Tuesday, at her residence at l'ortstnoudt, Mrs. ilard7 o/14 ., relict of the late Captain Ilardyntan, Barrack Mato P of . Cumberland. At Glasgow, on the 11th inst. after a long and severe inn% Mr; Wm. Duncan, writer in Glasgow, much regretted. ' FUG fi- WATER at LONDON MUDGE TO-ibltslitftJwi bleeping • • 20: minutes after S Afternoon LONDON •• Printed and peal: id by Liresa Kali, PI.M Pl.ce, Temple-Par itittlte of rou t E„, IS its ow n to ; evidence, ih ere Dile act Stoo l tz t ; ItTre jA y or • rs, that sol ar '`• that theie 141 , peace: AN LS to be e5t44,0 4 . the ground h i ' —.he tkouzkt ere you bate ; aotiont! .6 4 then says, q ui ing up and and we bu t h t what follute4 : - and /roam he could' F, lend luau nu kix legal t which Cu : e tide ►»el/ott certainly beu.,p nen, it i, trop oiti , DOer. dOU&S, CO/Liget DOS, u 2 tegzi hand-, commiu - • isuce." acute , f Rites, I defineu it to bet set b,ett on sera, „ ,ossibie n ot i n tot nt of a 1419 e• tarn ze welt [tired Antholit it; :y c the co-opera,* it Jett it to that ice of the pi islet is the hbett) 01 to:. the Jury, r.• helm evidence tu pry by the conduct eJ —l'siot Gaily. • er the Rezortier, e'' %%inch he Cold hem to moo* c if *noise atul tared "it tot whether theca ' king that noise* •, an evidence of tic , • , ict of Not I Court, wa, really d the gallery tole e .ken into co,tudy. • rs r ' beHi w ig as 01 erec k h 2 ei by their fees, steal h nformod thattkeY er glut go about thew Id that their lto ' The RECOKOLI i observed, thu s t respited till oat obably be en•lbied his intimation). ; • u iwever, a warm u Mayor, and these . s the ground -dot k o Me iodidaat, d woe all readi .3 ig the only teal. • n, urge to tbe Jury- - Jail, where they unless bailed nap time for ark of the Spink-hill tee way, and fair y i SWO wmanes a ya llit ‘ 05,(40 lArden Tautreo • instantaneously who Iva !cl by her shriek:, large cloak abed , but she remaio z as burnt frog& )st. Mt ,s State' e hands and Aran =titularly WWI° three of WOW Friday, at Hay, whir* Al!! at the elope deaf_ ' war IlornOcen,WP • who returned keel OWIDI4--SatirdaTili.*