Star. — London, England, 1823-05-30 00:00:00

POVERTY TARTS GOOD COMPANY. BY JOANNA BAILLIB. • Ant—" Todlet I :ar:e." 1 1 ,11:1 white was myn'erl Ay.* as foam nn the lin, And sailer was chinking my pouches within ; When my lambkins were bleating on meadow and brae, As I gaed to my love in new cl.:eding sae gay : Kind eves she, and my friends were free, But Poverty parts good company! Tinw swift pass'd the minutes and hours of delight, ' When picer play'd sheerly, and cruily burnt bright ! And link d in my hand was the maiden sae dear, As she footed the floor in her Italy-day Beer. Woe is use! and can it then ba, • That l'Overty parts sic company ? ,/, - We met:at the fair, and we met at the kirk; , -••••-- We met,l i' the sun-shine, we met l' the mirk; ," 7 And the sound o' her voice, and the blinks o' her e'en, The cheering and life o' my bosom ha'e been. Leaves frae the tree at Martinmas flee, ihAud Poverty parts sweet company! t bridal and infant I've braced me we pride, ~ e bruit I ha'e won, and a kiss of the bride ;$ .. f ftbsi loud Wai the laughter gay fellows aniang, Viten I utter'd my banter, and chinned my song. TSovrie and dree are jetting and glee, • When Poverty spoils goad company ! Vherever I gaed the Blythe lasses stnifd sweet, • And tiddlers and auntie:, were unto discreet, While Ist:Muck and beaker were set nn the boaul, bur now they pass by me, and never a word ! • Sac let tc be—for the warldly and she Al'i' Poverty keep nac company! But the hope of any love is a cure for its smart ; • The spee.wite has tent me to keep up my heart; • For we my last saxpence her loot I ha'e Gros. S.; • And the bliss that is fated can never be loaf : Cruelly though we ilka day see • How Povert,• parts dear company ! • O'criay--A neckcloth. t Inf lire—The entertainment made for the reception of a bride in the house of the bridegroom: Bruie—A race at country weddings, the winner of which b, the privilege of saluting the bride. Conowsn't luoutsrs.—An Inquisition was taken yesterday, at the Turf Tap (TarrEnsaLL's) by Mr. CELL, the Coroner for Westminster, on the body of a man unknown, who died.on Tuesday last in St. (ieorge's Hospital.:--The deceased was observed, on Tuesday afternoon, between four and five o'clock, sit ting against the wall of the Duke of WELLINGTON'S stables., in Piccadilly, apparently quite exhausted, and when spoken to was unable to answer. He was carried to 'St. Caorge's Hospital, where some st mutating• medicine being immediately adminis tered, appeared to revive him a little. Ile seemed to be sensible of what was passing, but never spoke s and died about ten o'clock. He was apparently a la bouring man, was decently dressed, and had upwards of 2s. in money about his person, and part of a but tered roll in his pocket. The body being opened, some food was found in the stomach ; the lungs were partly diseased, and he had every appearance of having died from debility and exhaustion. Verditt— Died by the visitation of Goo. Wednesday an Incpre:t was held at the Elephant and Castle, Camden Town, on the bodies of John Roe and John Bishop. Mr. Dupre, a pavior, who some time ago built a sewer in Drummond-street, Euston-square, had occasion, about twelve months siuce, to dam it up about half way, in order to force back the water into a brick-field, for the purpose of making brick , . On Tuesday, for the purpose of removing this dam, and letting the water again flow, these two men went• into the sewer, and on their re moving the dam a discharge of water and foul air suddenly burst upon them. A boy beard a moan, and gave an alarm to some labourers, when Angus-. tine Egan went in and dragged out Roe, and had him conveyed to the workhouse, where a surg eon _ at tended, bat he was too far gone to recover. Thomas Walker, another labourer, went into the sewer for the other man, after was taken out; the mud was then about three feet deep ; he was about to return, being nearly sdffocated, when lie laid hold of one of Bishop's legs, and with much difficulty dragged him out, bui he was quite dead; he was himself nearly exhausted when he got out. Verdict—Died by suf focation, occasioned by foul air. • • rdanslosailonso , —Yesterday, a baker, named Duos. who re sides in Little Eastchelp, charged a flour-factor of Mark-lane with having sold him flour mixed with some material which In jurad the flavour and colour of the bread which Was madefrom the article. It appeared front the statement of the complainant, ' dal several bakers in the Metropolis have been subjected to belay losses in custom, as well as in the immediate and irrt psrsble injury to, their stock, by being supplied by flour-factors with flour adulterated In a very high degree. The case was post. potted for further examination. T.iinms roskr, the boy who drove the Greenwich coach, and ran over Mr. Fullayson, was brought up for final examination.--. The certificate of the surgeon was produced, stating that Mr. Irlidayson, since the amputation of his leg, was going on well, and might be considered our of danger.—The Loa* MATO% un der c i rcu mstances; admitted the' prisoner to bail. His p declared his determination of prosecuting, with sews rtty, any one of those coach-skivers, or ot h er persons , w h o , either by negligence or furious driving, endangered the lives or limbs of his Majesty's subjects. • .1 Bow-Stmerr.—An application IV 7.3 made to Sir RICHARD Dia.; Her and Tuonas Haim, Esq. the presiding Magistrates, by an Attorney, for a warrant against a young Lady, whom he de,„ sullied to be living in a . mnct fashionable style, for obtaining, by false pretences, front several tradesmen who were then present, goods to the amount of between 7 and 8031. The lady, he said, had in the first instance applied to him, and represented herself as the only surviving Child of an eminent builder, who lately died worth a considerable sons of money. the whole of which was coming to her. She gave him instructions to take the ne sessary steps towards forwarding her claim, and alto produced soreral documents tending to prove the truth of her assertions. tae accordingly took such measures as she ease required; when, ' in the meantime, the lady hired a large house, and, besides an extensive assortment of handsome furniture, ordered in virile s.re artitless jewellery, watches, &c. referring the tradesmen to him for a con fi rm ation of her statement, and on the faith of what he told theM, they gave her credit; it has however bean since ascertained, that, akherogh she was actually the person she represented herself, she had nu title to her father's property,. as mother was stilt living ; but; on the contrary, that it was so disposed of, that she would sos have a shilling of it. Under these circumstances, application was made to the lady to return back her ill-gotten spoil; bus she peresupturtly'refused.—The appli cants entered into a lOng discussion, c ontending that the her of the principal representation, namely, the right to the property, bAi.g fal4e, there was suateienr authority to grant a warrant; but 51r. HALLS remarked that he would not gr!!nt it, u• um. mon caution had not been used:" "sod," rejoined Fris Boman* Blum, " Common sense would have dictated sock a melitioir a.-.d he wished it to be generally ndttersteod by tredenneo, se.chout accessory caution was observed before they wasted( strangers to such an enormous areaway the protecidoo agile law would not be efiorded dorm, as ft was melyinteaded -for the prevention of intrisitine etrtho beam and indararidus tads*. Luso , w hile many, with a view to Osiers* milli, gem eirante , s o nf Creakye i they knote solidi, of; hot in such lopes tee law anliy. + M t .. I . ,LA IV INTEL - LIGEN 'E. COURT OF KING'S 13RNCH. MAY 2L • ()Am NG TIIANSACTIOIf. MURRAY V. THE EARL. 01.8YAIR. •. i;'. This action was brout;ht by the plaintiff, iistledmi• nistrator of the late Williatn Murray . against tlik pre sent Lord Stair, on a bond bearing date the 3d of November, 1813. The plaiatifriOis declaration al leged that the defendant mailer And delivered the bond as his deed. The condition was for payment within six nionths after the death of the then Lord Stair to Mr. William Murray of the sum of 2,0001. . The defendant pleaded, first, that the bond' was Dot his; 'secondly, that he delivered it not as his deed, but as a writing to be held over as his deed after the . death of Lord Starr. He next pleaded that he sealed this and delivered it ai - a writing to be considered as his deed, on the delivery of two promissory notes which were not delivered. Tke writing having been delivered before-the death of Lord Stair, and the notes not delivered, it was not his deed. The SOLICITOR-GEYERAL stated the facts. The plaintiff, an Officer of the Navy, sued as the repre sentative of his late father, who-received,in his Nisi ness as an Army Agent, two notes, accepted by the present Earl of Stair, at the time he was Mr. Dal- ' rymple. The bills were the result of a gaming trans action at Paris, and when Lord Stair was called upon for payment, the bond in question was given to Mr Sanders, LGrd Stair's attorney. The objection, he understood, was, that the terms of the bond had not been complied with, inasmuch as it was given up to :14. Murray before the death-of the late Lord Stair, 'without a delivery of the promissory notes ; still, how ever, it was the deed of the noblidefendant, and the plaintiff would be entitled to recover. There was no desireto detain the notes when the bond was satisfied. Mr. Sanders proved the fact of having the bond in his possession, and delivering it to 4lr. Murray. Mr. SCAttLETT, for Lord Stair, said his_ noble client was not to be bound by any other contract than that he actually made. Mr. Murray. had not been engaged in gambling transactions, but he re ceived bills accepted by Mr. Dalrymple, which were given as a security until the amount could be paid. The noble defendant was surprised to find the notes in possession of Mr. Murray. He was not prepared to pay the amount, and. as necessity had. no lay,. he_ stated to his attorney that he was willing Mr. Murray should have the amount, if be would wait till after the death of Lord Stair. He made the writing, sx hick was not to operate before the death of Lord Stair... Secondly, the promissory note.; were to be delivered,? up. Would any man of common sense hive giVeo up the bond without the notes? The condition of the bond had, however been violated, and he con tended the plaintiff could not recover. The LORD Cuszs AMUR, in his charge to the Jury, said the cpiestion for their consideration was, whether the deed' was delivered with an express con dition ? If they should be of opinion i; was delivered as the defendant's deed without condition, although some stipulation was made that it should remain in the hands of the attorney, still, whether it was deli vered tip or not, his opinion was, that it was the de fendant's deed. If it was delivered up without no tice, still it would be his deed.---The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff. NEGLIGENT DRIVINO. CULTERWELL D. RAW'S AND ANOTHER. This was an action brought by the plaintiff, who is a master tailor, to recover from the defendants, who are contractors for conveying the Mail to and from Portsmouth and London, compeniation. ht da mages for an injury sustained by him in coasequence. of the negligence of the defendants servant. Frorn the evidence offered fir the plaintiff; it appeared that . on the 21st of May, 1822, he was an outside passen: ger on the Mail from Pcirtsmouth to London, which' came up with the-Nelson opposition coach at a place within about ten miles of Petersfield. The guard' sounded his horn, and the Nelson was &tering off to allow the Mail to pass; but the coachman of the Mail, in attempting to pass before the Nelson gave sufSci-, cut room, upset the coach, in consequence of Which. the plaintiff's leg was fractured. He was taken into I l an inn called the Seven Thorns, where his leg was set, and where he remained for a considerable time at a very great expense. In about two months after this accident happened, the plaintiff was walking across the room on crutches, when he slipped, and' again fractured his leg in the same part, which ocea• shined him additional expense, and the leg was now shorter than the other. _ _ Mr. Seawater, for the defendants, trusted that the Jury - would take into consideration the contract into which the defendants had entered with the Post.elfice, and by which they were bound to cane" the mail within a certain time. Such a crane= made the servants of the defendants most anxious not to. make any delay ; and if the unmet et she defendants was solely to blame for this widest, it smut be attributed to.' his anxiety to perform the journey within the time jimited, and not to want of skill or caution; but he trusted that he should he able_ to prove the accident was solely 'fittributable to the' improper conduct of i;be coachman of thit Seism's, and at the tiatetlittAhlF. tiff ,acquitted the defendants' servant of all Knew ; but, notwithstanding this the defendants, wishing to behave in a handsome manner, paid the doctor's bills and the expenses incurred at-the Seven vit., 'The Learned Counsel then called the son 'Of one of the defendants. lie swore that his father sent him to the Seven Thorns •to see that the plaintiff was pro= perly attended to; and itt a conversation which" hit bad had with the plaintiff, he • admitted that. the 'coachman of the mail was not at all la-fault.. •. • • The guard of the mail-coach swore, that oh the night the accident eeetwred he heard the plaintiff say that their coachman was not at all to blame. The coachman swore that when he attempted to pass the Nelson there was plenty of room ; but Jest -as his leaders were abreast of the hind wheels of the' ' Nelson, the coachman of the Nelson began to'Whip his near horse, and in drawing his hand wand, the lash touched the eye of one of the leaders of the mail, which took fright, and in her attempting to get on; tie coach was, upset. His Loansrup summed up. The Jurf.nould not by law take into their consideration the contract en tered into between the defendants and the Pirst.efteti; became if any party voluntarily enter into a•contract, and that in the performance of that contract ast, injury be dons to a third portmn, the patty doingtbe iejery WAS liable to make cornpensati on to the person injured. If the Jury should be of ( - Tinton that the accident was owing to the negligence of the Jefendants' coach man, their verdict must be for the.pl t aintitf; or if tlu Jut y should' bc of opinion that the accident was at tributable partly to the negligence of the Nelson coachman, and partly to the negligence of the de fendants' coachman, still a verdict most pass for the plaintiff, betause his actinn was maintainibloagainst the proprietors °loath toach ; nut if the Jury should be of opinion that the /Nelson coacOnlan was alone to be blamed; then their verdict must be for the de fendants.—'The Jury having retired 'Mt' some time, found a verdict fat-. the plahttif—Damages 401. . • AIRY 49. Tint IRXTZR. A I MS was an lAdiCtaatt charging the defendant . with . per-jail, in an affidavit made to support ap plication in theCoult of.Xines.fferiettor a new trial. The action from which the proceeding_ arose was brought by Mr. Isaac Shannon, against Abraham Owen and others, assignees of Cohen, a banks opt. so , recover the value of a vessel, which they Itad.forciblt, takerroat of Mr. Shannon's pnssession. Mr. Shannon claimed title to the vessel under a bill of sale from a person named Phillips, bearing date the 10th of Fe bruary, 1815;to which two persons named Baker and Slow 'were the subscribing witnesses. The vessel had been previa :sly assigned to Phillips by Cohen, whose assignees, asserting that the assignment was fraudulent and Noid, seized the •'vessel by force. Mr. Shannon . brought an action against then, to recover its value, and succeeded in obtaining a verdict for ':'3o/. at the leie SurnMerAssizes for EEsex. At this trial, as . the defendants were unable to prove the bankruptcy . of Cohen, the question of the validity of the sale eirl-•nat arise, since they failed in . makfag out atty. title its thiErnselves which could, authorise them to inteiferei . with the plaintiff's poisession. In the following Mi.; 'clatelnsas Term, they made application f.ir a new trial, 214-obtained a Itule to strew ,cause. In sups' rt of this : application an a ffi davit was made by Mr. Baiter; 'whatad been the Captain of the vessel, in outer to skew that the merits of the case were with the as signees. In this affidavit, he stated.that he was pre sent at the execution •ot the bill . of sale from Phillips to Shannon, and that George Slow, one of she sub scribing witnesses, was not present ; on this allegation the assignment of perjury was founded. To prove this statement untrue, George Slow him- Self: the subscribing witness in question, was first, called, who stated that he was clerk to Mr. Baker, the broker, who negocinted the bargain at the .time, and at whose house the assignment was executed ; that he was present.at the ; and that he be lieved the defendant was not present. Mr. Baker, his master,- who was the other subscribing witness, also. stated that Slow.was present, and wrote the attestation atashytime, and that he believed Baxter was absent. The Limo Cuiae Soma intimated that he did not 4 percelve in what manner the allegation on which perjury was assigned was material to the result of the application for a new trial. Mr. GURNEY, who conducted the prosecution, ar -end that-the statement was material, as giving an air of fraud to the whole transaction, which it was necessary for the defendants to impeach. • The LORD Cuter Jusricn, however, thought that as no question had been previously raised respecting the execution of the bill of sale, and as the main ob.. ject of the affidavit was to shew that the preyious as signment ef the vessel to Phillips was fraudulent, thp matter was not sufficiently connected with the' Bands Of the application to be regarded - as ma terial to its issue. . _ , Mr. GURNEY declined pressing the case further. ' ,The Jory, under the direction of the Lotto Cum JuaTtos, found a verdict of—Aot Guilty. . . DE LXZAV V. PRATT. This was an action to recover £lOOO, the amount Of the defendant's insurance on a vessel called the Nancy. Tim plaintiff is a Merchant at Ilk) Janeiro, and the defendint en Underwriter at Lloyd's. It appeated . thatthe plaintiff being desirous of sending a crergoof goods from Ri&to Lima, wished to make an insurance, as the coast of Peru was known to be put in a state of blockade by Lord Cochrane. He accordingly agreed with the defendant to insure to the amount Of one thousand' pounds.. The whole value of the . cargo was £49,900. •The goods were to be shipped as . English rock, although they were Spanish. If known to be Spanish, they would have been subject at once to seizure by- the Insurgents of south America. • The Captain heard, in the course of the voyage, that Lima was closely blockaded, and that it would be impossible to.land. Having rounded Carpe Horn, he pat into Pisco, on the coast of Peru, to gain more particolar information. He anchored under • the fort, and soot * messenger overland to Liana to state his situation to- the consignees of. the cargo, and ask advite -as to, the course it would be best to take. They sent him word that the,-ieforma-, tion be had received* was correct,ond that in attack frosts the Patriot fleet was expected. Landing Otte foia would be extremely dangerous, and as tbd wea.' thee would 'be sternly at that season it was not ad. visehleiti 1 -- • the sea. There were three plats to which he m s go Instil the warlike'positihn of the l a Patriopts shoe be altered. The ports were Acapulco, in Mexko; Panama,. ars& St. Blis. The Captain wood ttbt go to the two first because he considered the alintiate unhealthy, bat proceeded to St. Blas, al thookh *the distance from Lima was very consider able. The voyage was long, and thijkoods became unfit for the port of Lima. She remained at St.:Blas 102 days, with expectation thee the Patriots would attack the town • and at Ole expiration of that time o• -*Jain sailed 1,4 t Koo. .It was his intention to have landed at pftllcie, but the-miss of Lord Coch rane's suespres prevented him putting that design in eseitttion. 'Arriving within•a_few leagues of ilisco, a thiek - fog preceded him seeing the laud, and he ran into the port. Soon,idter he landed he was seized, and throtru into a dungeon—his ship was also seized. The Faopesty was suspected to be Sautnish, and after tome judicial inquiry, the weszel was conderone4 as a lawful prise, The action was brought upon the above fatts to the amount of insurance for which the de fendant had sobsaibed. .. MT.IIARRY#TT, for the defendant, admitted that his client knew the coast of Peru was blockaded at the time he subscribed the policy, but his objection was that be did not bow the real state of the cargo. He , did not know that the goods were Spane.h property, under the appearege , o 1 English pack ages . Had the uodorwrieers know-A. that fact they' must have con . eluded dust sending out such goods to Lima, N A:a sending . the same .to be condemned. beckl itt 4, blockade of Lord Cochrane" vial s ji:iient" the bfii• . •, . a. teaching that port wit . nout'unuerg 4 ning a • stitct setrOt • Fitt' Captain, hi"vert might'-l 1:3 " gomf.lo s o m e 'Other post than St. Lilts, tvlvte it was impessiLl e t o • remain with advantage. The Learned Counsel also Considered thertmning into Pisa): in . th e C og,. Iw o. gence, which released the underwriters.. The Captain' knew the state of Peru, having lefrLimion'atcointl. ,of the danger which he apprehended. ) . Mr. MA [MYATT was proceeding, .% hen . The LOCI) CHIEF JUSTICE said—" I think i -question will he, whether the. Jury conside r a ''''' of eight months a i easonable delay, and whether .. L onderwriters are li•thle for so extensive a risk mg* that delay;—lastly, whether the 'Captain, knowingi • the state of the whel~ coast of Peru, ought •not- to have sent a messcnzer before the second landing er risco, to ascertain whether his fears were realized! before he attempted to go on shore?" . The Jury here observed, that they were of opitiidot 'the *delay was unreasonable. * The Loan Cu iEr Jusnca asked nr". Scariest wiie.- ther he - could avoid being called? ... -Mr.SCarite:TT found himself obliges! to submifitic nonst • it, and the pl Anti fl was accordingly nonsuitel ' 1 ' COUAT OF COMMON PLEAS, MAY gi. : • TIODOMIN V. WESTON. ; • bir:Serjelilt VationaN.itatetl, this was an act*. on the warranty of a horse. Tbe.borse had been tht-,- property.of a Gentleman of fortune, residin g o u r Peterborough, from whom the defendant purettsoi it about the end of February last: in - the amniotic,. anent of the en,lting month -the - plitintiff•porefunit the horse from the dcfenclant,7autder a wearanty, die price of fifty guineas., The hero had beep a. gently once or twice, and is a very short timieroie t t to be cempletely onsound; klipg an ossificatitiite the fetlock:lona of the off toft , kg. The puiclaiSiand - wiryaritY - were proved. • • Mr. Sauttl.:—.l saw the horse on the igib Marti last, and. on examining. the outerbranch of the see. ' pensary ligament of the off foie leg, near the fetlock • joint, I observed a callosity formed; this is a cos , aequence of previous' iittlaninte titan ; if the injare were recent, there would be a general fulness and heat in the whole joint ; thiS was a chronic dismal joint ; the horse was in the same state lest week as in March ; when the disease is not very extensive, reit would make it:appear better, but on the &Weser: tion in carrying weight, the horse would go lease again. This disease must have existed berate Mr.- ' Hodgson purchased the horse Cross-examined.— I saw the horse about ten data after the purchase, and again last week. Horses are very liable to injuries in that part by a twist of the foot; still, however, I think the horse wAs diseasedin that joint before the Bth ; if the horse hid been led up from Peterborough without any weight. on his back, the part would not have been more injured; a little gentle exercise, without cal rying weight, is often ,beneficial to a horse. Mr.,Serjeant PEW. addressed the Jury for tbe de. fendant, and three witnesses proved that they,had ridden the horse before the purchase by the plairnit and that he then. appeared petfectly sound. Mr. Edward Coleman, Pinfessor to the Veterinary College, wasahea called, and said, I first saw..the holse on last Monday ; I. found the off fore leg,- larged on the -outside of the fetlock joint; the ea largement is an increased ossification of that bona- Ite.nding a little waybp the ligament. It is so sab• vious, that' any person: the least acquainted with hOrses musopeicetve it; it• is impossible to say haw long it has existed; it might have existed for years, :but on the facts sworn to this day, I think it veald not have existed when the horse was purchased; the • man who • shod the horse might not have perceived the injury, though the inflammation might then have , beep in existence, as the smiths attend to nothing but merely putting on the shoe. •Cross-examined.—l think the iniury-morc likely to have arisen from a blow than a strain ; at the timeuf the injury there must have been tendetness, and per haps Loneness apparent. Re-examined.—lf the part, in that state, had been pressed upon, the horse would have exhibitedaofee symptom of weakness. By the Joooz.—l should not have formed std opinion on the 24th of March, because it is impte sible to . state the time required for the progress *fa suffocation in every case; its progress is by no means regular; it sometimes proceeds with greater, d ad sometimes with less rapidity. Mr. Justice Peet having summed up, The Jury, after - a few moments' consultation, give a verdict for the plaintiff—R.:images, 521.10 s—for the horse, and 71. 10s. for his keep since the porelnitt• BIBTIIS. May 19, at Earsdoc, thovitrat tjo Err. DetirfWatheasa, • jet a.m. .]flay 19, at Whim, the Ladyof Archibald Mootiomarfilhir *a daughter. • - .. • • 7. - at Etrasht,etio Lady of Lieutenant-C*lmq porno*, of tho Rile Brigade C.B. and K. St. A. of a sogr.. . .4. • iesnree.- DIED. May 23, very suddenly; at SiOn-hill, Bath; jggf l,,. Eq. many vears in the East badia Compaq's eerifetk March 14, at Sierra 'Leone,. Ger* Mat Zekh, Elq.ahlf isnot' Gar. Sir Gant - lEoth, Bart. R, N: • May 22, at Nairn Joan Gunn' latf: Sheriff foisegaiet d that county. March 27, at Freericitstr, New Itnimwilrek, agid MO' General George TkrAl4l.4-99:rersor of d . . .• province. At Madras, on the Mt December bbiritfomas Banta, lit Regional, of Coxiodge,'Nerthitinberlasid, M tbe 11th . .of Madras Native Infantry. ' May 12, at !Tattoo Manat,"Thstarfes- shire , Mrs. Mary EWA relict of the . ltev. Robert Hood, D.D. fora sly Hanover-square Chapel, Newcastle. • Last week, in. the Overitate, Duss4oi, tkiwidOse Ifitivh the advanced a of 103 teary. Al A l 1.-&—TIIIIMINkiIe- -, • e ' Alia ens , A "A i; 'VP: DuNin 1 0 France . • 0 f , Waterford - 1 0 Hambirgls i' • gr. - G tieT 114/ and henry 0 0 Flanders -• 1 • ill 1-i-thon '- • 0 Male , 0' •r, Holland 1 0 Gettenbstegh ~ 0., ke A merica 0 0 Brazil o . O r i • , RENAL TZTA ELS CHICUMSTAWCIL .--• Tofterday, there wal l single Mail doe et the Post-o ffi ce; and the Maib Hour and llonand, which were not due dlttithirsetnibitsistele were delivered before Two • o'Cleck.'—'lllif steriplats-1•O only a Gurrust,4ldail due. •• - • :? :UGH WATfiltat LON nom 1:1i1OnleTtl."400 441 Mcrning • - • A •-r.ilitpir tits'/'! Aftrrnoott . • LONDON: Prlntisl sad published I PLlce, RM.