Star. — London, England, 1808-03-01 00:00:00

❑'tlON OF MR. BARING'S WORK UPON THE ORDERS IN COUNCIL. • This day was published, price 4s. THE SECOND EDITION, or NQUIRY into the CAUSES and CONSE TENCES of the ORDERS in COUNCIL, and an Elm. the Conduct of Great Britain towards the :Neutral _ of America. By ALEXANDER BARING, Esq. M. P. 1 for I. M. Richardson, No. 23, Cornhill, opposite the .xchange, and Ridgway, Piccadilly. VALUABLE PRESENT FOR. YOUTH. • few days will be published, in one vblunie, limo. .OSOPHY for YOUTH, or SCIEN'tIFIC TUTOR ; being the Young Natural Philosopher's useful comprizing an endeavour to render the first priniiples* ' Mechanics, &c. Scc. familiar to the youthful mind, to µ•hich is' Exercises in Elocution. By WILLIAM PERRY, .s the Royal Standard F.nglish and French Dictionaries, iynouymons, Etymological and Pronouncing Dictionary, &c. 4 for M. Richardson, No. ns, Cornhill, opposite the Royal Exchange. This day was published, in one Volume *lvo. Price 7s. in boards, ILLUSTRATION of the General Evidence establishing the Reality of CHRIST'S RESURRECTION. By GEORGE COOK, A. M. ' Minister of Laurencekirk. for Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme, Paternoster-row, and Peter Hill, Edinburgh. , day were published, in One Urge Vclume, Octavo, prier 9s. in boards, ,CTURES on SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY, and on PULPIT ELOQUENCE. • tilt. late GEORGE CAMPBELL, D. D. F. R. S. Ed. Principal of Marisehal College, Aberdeen. Printed for T. Cadell and W. Davies, Strand. Of whom may be had, by the same Author, __ Poet Gospels, translated from the Greek ; with 'reliminary Dissertations, and Notes, Critical and Explanatory. -v Edition, with the Author's last Corrections. Four Volumes N, 11. 12s. in boards. DISSERTATION GO MIRACLES. Third Edition. To are added, Sermons and Tracts. 2 Vols. Octavo, 12s This day was published, price 2s. ,ErrEit to the GOVERNORS, LEGISLATURES, and PROPIIITORS of PLAsrArioNs in the British West Islands. By the Right Rev. BEILBY PORTEUS, D. D. Bishop of London. Printed for T. Cadell :nd W. Davies, Strand ; T. Paynet all Mall ; er d F. C. and J. Rivingtous, St. Paul's Chureh-yard4 I Of - whom may be had, lately published, by the same Author, Sermons on several Subjects. Vol. 1. Tenth Edition, vol' h Edition, price 12s. in boards. Summary of the Evidences of the Christian Religion, 11th on, price 2s. 6d. Lectures on the Gospel of St. Matthew, 2 vols. Imo. Ninth on, price 13e. in boards. Miscellaneous Tracts. Second Edition, 7 - ' This day were published, in Three Volumes, 12me. Price 13s. 6d. in boards, the Third Edition of LTTERS from the MOUNTAINS. Being the real Correspondence of a Lady. Between the ye irs 1773 807.--The Letters in this edition are au:, g. I in the -g of time in which they were written. Printed for Longman, Hurst, Rees, and Orme, Paternoster 1. Hatchard, Piccadilly ; and Mrs. Cooke, Bury-street, ames's. • The charm of these letters consists in their being the artless effusion of a superior mind. There is sterling good sense in most - remarks on books, manners, education, &c. and a great of originality. She always appears to us in a light at once respectable and amiable. Her understanding is strong, her fancy her sensibility acute. She has the art of placing every z before our eyes; we see her, we hear her, and we become luainted with her; and when we shut her book, we seem to leave of a friend."—Annual Review. 7s. in boards. This day was published, In two thick Volumes Quarto, price 41. 4s. in boards, N tTYMOLOGICAI, DICTIONARY of the SCOTTISH LANGUAGE, illustrating the words in • different Signification, by examples from ancient and ino writers, shewing their Affinity to those of other Languages, especially the Northern ; explaining many terms, which, ;h now obsolete in England, wore formerly common to both ,tries, and elucidating National Rights, Customs, and Instruc ,, in their analogy to those of other nations ; to which is prefixed a Dissertation on the Origin of the Scottish Language, By JOHN JAMIESON, D. D. 7 ellowtsf the Royal Society of Edinburgh, and of the Society of the Antiquaries of Scotland. Printed for Longman, Hurst, Reec, and Orme, Cadell and svis, and H. D. Symonds, London ; and W. Creech, A. Con tble and Co. and W. Blackwood, Edinburgh. MODERN HISTORY. This day was published, printed in demy itfmo. 'liar to Mayor's Nepos, and Blair's Class-Book, illustrated by a large Map, price 6s. bound and lettered , mODERN HISTORY for the Use of Schools; exhi'titing a summary View of the Rise, Progress, Revo aims, Decline and Fall of the various Modern Nations in Eu rope, Asia, Africa and America, from the Age of Charlemagne the Year 1607. By the Rev. JOHN ROBINSON, Of Chriles-college, Cambridge. faster of the Free Grammar School, at Ravenstonedale, in West moreland, Author of the Grammar of History ; of the Archai c le,ia Grata, &c. &c. Printed for Richard Phillips, No. 6, Bridge-ttrt et, Black iars ; and to be had of all Bcoksellers, with the full allowance Schools. Of whom may be had, by the tame Author, 1. An Easy GRAMMAR of Uttivrasni Him)av, by means which that important branch of Knowledge may, for the first time, be practically taught in Schools. Price 35. bound in green. 2. Arrcittcr HISTORY, from the earliest records of time te the fall of the Roman Empire ; on the plan of the above described Mo dern History, price 6s. 3. ARCREOLOCIA GRZCA ; or, the Antiquities of Greece. `rice 125. bound. _ _ TO SURGEONS, APOTHECARIES, MIDWIVES, mox. CAL STUDENTS, &c. This day was published, in Five large Volume, Octavo, closely printed with many, lates., price 31.155. in buards, A w Edition' of THE EDINBURGH PRACIC of PHYSIC, SURGERY, mid MIDWI T FERYE . TIIIS WORIL CONTAINS, 1. An Introductory History of each Branch of the Medical ?rofession. 2. The Theory of Medicine, Physiology, Pathology, and The rapeutics, from Dr. Cullen, and other Edinburgh Professors. S. Cullen's Nosology complete, in English. 4. The History,Distinction, Causes, and Cure of every human Disease, agreeably to the approved Classification and Doctrines of the celebrated Cullen. 5. The latest Improvements suggested by Medical Writers of the first eminence; amongst whont are Drs. CUllen, Monro, re gory, Fordyce, Perci val, Beddoes, Foe D rs Lettsom, Garnett, Heberden, Denman, Moseley, Rush, Trotter,Satinders, Currie, Sims, Haygarth, Houlston, Willan, Simmons, Ironer, Clark, Bradley, &c. &e. Me ssrs. Hunter, Bell, Ilyffe Home, Earle, Abernethy, Latta, Baynton, Kendrick, Kentish, Rumsey, Wilson, and others. 6. Cases illustrative of the Treatment recommended in every Disease of difficult Management. 7. Upwards of Six Hundred authentic Formula from the Books at the public Hospitals and Dispensaries; the Lectures and Writ ings of Medical, Chirurgical, and Midwifery "Teachers; and the private Contributions of distuiguished Practitioners in Edinburgh and London. SA number of elegant Copper-plate Engravings of Chirurgical, and Midwifery Subjects. Lomion: Printedfor G. Kearney, Fleet-street Bell and Brad tutu, Edinburgh ; and Brash and Reid, Glasgow. ill NEW E.Drtio: A N ENQ I QUENC mination of the Commerce of J By A Printed for . Royal Exchang ------. • VAI In a few I pI-111.0Si A TUTOR Companion, cc of Mechanics, prefixed, Exert Anthor of the the Synonym Printed for ------.--- Thi A N ILL .44 A establial Printed for Lt -------. This day L ECTU By do. It P Prh Of 1. The Fe Preliminary New Edition Octavo, IL 1 2. A Dis which are ad ----- Pi LET and Il India Island: _ By I Printed ft Pall Mall ; Ofwhom 1. Serino 2. 6th Editio 2. Sunun Edition, pri 9. Lectui Edition, pri 4 Misce • This P LETT real C and 1807. — order of tie V Printed o row ; I. St. James's "Thee effusion of of her rerr ' • share of or respectabb 1 1 lively, bet thing bele] acquaintee take leave 11 ---- ki In t . 1 A N the their dill% *:1 dern writ and espe though n 4 Countrie i I ' 1- tions, in prefixed Fellow•i3 Prime Davis, a . , \ it - stable z.. 4 ------ fi Similar • lutioos, rope, A to the 1 1 I\ lastet moo el / Prin friars; to Sch 4 1. .4 of lob' time, 2. 4 fall of darn I 3. 1 Price TO. This T 1 1. Prof 2. rape 3. 4. Dist of tt 5. thei son I-let Sim Bra _Co and 4 Dis 7 of t log pri• and 4 as ] fin pAßLUMMlraiff*Oczzp. 11 must OP U DS, PEs. 20. _llr. ADAM was heard in eatlusion on the Appeal, Crawford aFinst Patrick. —Judgment was until Thursday nat. The Ten !Million and a liar aqua Bills Bill, and Petty Customs Survey orshipp Abolition went through a Committee. The Brazil Trade BM, and Treasurer of the Navy Regulation BM, were read a third time. LORD LAX& • Lord HAWKESBURY brought dawn a Message from his Majesty, recommending the settling of a pension of 20001. a year on Lord Lake, in'considera tion of the eminent services performed by his Noble Father. It was ordered to be taken into consideration to-morrow. i . iCt AMERICAN TREATY. Lord AUCKLAND wished to be informed, from the Noble Secretary (Lord Hawkesbury), whether the official copy of the American Treaty had not reached the hands of the President of the United States on the 13th or 14th of March, and not, as had been stated, on the 3d of that month : he had reason to think that the Copy' which reached America on the latter day, was that transmitted to our Ambas sador : and as Congress terminated its session on the same day, it could not, in fairness, be alledged, that an opportunity had been lost of submitting it to their deliberation. Lord HAWKESBURY could not at present give a positive answer to the question ; but he would make the nesessary enquiry, It was extremely pro bable that it Would Wm out to be as the Noble Lord suggested. CUSTOM HOUSE PAPERS. Lord GRENVILLE adverted to the delay which had occurred in producing the instructions addressed to the Board of Customs, relative to the execution of the Orders in Council, together with a list of the neu.i tral vessels sent in, and subsequently released under bond.. Lord NAWKESBURY promised to make imme diate enquiry into the cause of the delay complained of. With regard to the list of vessels, he conceived there had scarcely been time to get returns from all the outports. ONDIF.RS IN COUNCIL. Lord HOLLAND gave notice of his intention to submit to their Lordships, on Thursday se'nnight, a motion respecting the commercial policy of the Or ders in Council. Lord ST. JOHN then called their Lordships' at. tention to the Order of the Day for considering the Orders in Council, in relation to the alledged facts on which they were supposed to proceed. The French Government had repeatedly, of late years, accused this country of having acquired its influence on the Continent by the arts of intrigue. Nothing could be more completely false. The ascendancy of England in foreign Courts, was the triumph of the British Constitution, which, through the medium of Parlia mentary discussion, and the influence of public opi nion, compelled the Government to act towards all powers according to the acknowledged principles of the law of nations, and the immutable principles of justice. The Noble Lord then entered into a detailed examination of the various documents already known to the public, to prove that the preamble of the Order in Council of the 11th of November last was unfoun ded, inasmuch as no neutral nation had, up to that date, acquiesced in the enemy's Decree of Blockade, nor were Ministers then possessed of any facts tend ing to spew that it had been executed with increased rigour. He concluded with moving a string of Reso lutions, drawn from these premises, strongly repre hensive of the Orders in Council. The Duke of MOI' , IT ROSE did not profess to be profoundly versed in the law of nations, but, assum ing it to be that of nature and self-preservation, ap plied to the conduct of independent States—he had not been able to find any thing at variance with it in the Orders of Conncil. We had a right to retaliate, not only in the same mode, but in such manner as to make the enemy feel the distress which he sought, by the violation of neutral rights, to inflict upon us. The time of doing so, was a question, not of justice, but of policy ; and he thought it would have been very unwise to wait the slow course of representations and remonstrance to the enemy from the neutral. The doctrine of retaliation had been most correctly and ably laid down by the late Administration, in their notes respecting the Order in Council of the 7th of January. He concluded with moving the previous question. Lord HOLLAND thought the line of argument taken by the preceding speaker should have kd him rather to negative the motion of his Noble Friend, than to propose the previous question, the usual mean. ing of which was, no more than that the matter in debate was not at the time a fit subject for considera tion. But what could be a fit subject of consideration, if a question was not so, which involved the justice and policy of our public measures, and affected the honour and dignity of the Government and the Coun try. Ministers were justly afraid of publishing the secret information which they professed to have re ceived, and which had been drawn from them by - a decision of that House, so far as respected the Orders in Council. They had not produced a single fact to substantiate that measure. The House would hence derive a lesson of caution as to the credit due on fu ture occasions, to allegations of secret intelligence, and a lesson of regret as to the confidence on which they had voted, with respect to the attack on Den mark. The Noble Lord then entered into a wide field of argument, to prove that America . had never ac quiesced in the enemy's decree ; that she had, with the utmost possible promptitude, remonstrated against it; and that, when the Orders in Council came eut, it had not, in a single instance, been enforced against her. From these premises he inferred that the orders were a gross violation of the rights of neutrals. He then took a view of the Order of the 7th of January, with the notes explanatory of that measure, and con tended, that it was strictly within the law of nations, and that the further retaliation then threatened, was most distinctly founded on the extent of actual block ade, to which our maritime resources were competent. Lord MULGRAVE complained of the conduct of the Noble Lords opposite, in splitting the subject of the Orders in Council into so many minute ques tions of, detail, as tending to harrass Administration, and withdraw their attention from their.official duties. He asserted our right to retaliate upon the enemy to such extent, and in such manner, as would prove most likely to make him revoke his unjust decree. — The system adopted was that which he conceived to . . i ti is r h etat em testle in ce en s t o , f inirriLetec.ountri, he purpose, while it imposed t T o h l nl n " e 2este ere .s., the least possible restraints upon neutrals. be molt e ffi cient for this t a‘ g la h h e uhder had .etard AUCKLAND, from the tenor of the Note bad high - duties impoSied upon hitt, in keeping e , which he and his Noble Friend (Holland) delivered, table to all o ffi cers, who hive eerted under him, - cc on s - • signing the American Treaty, conceived the ho- w ell . ken. w the beneficence of his private ' ° 'e chara c ter. ' nour of the GOVernm ent p led g ed a g ainst the adoption Colonel WOOD gave to the motion Ns heanee, . of the system which had been pursued with regard to s pp e ert. If ever there wis a gallant ulcer, oose the United States . ! Lake vets one. He would enter into n • . 0 comp r i se ,. In the sequel of the debate, the original motion between the merits of Earl 'Howe avid Lord Lake was supported by Lord s Lauderdale, Grey, and but great as the services of the former heete seem , the ; Grenville ; while Lords Redesdale, Westmorland, were equalled by those of Lord Lake. Hawkesbury, and Galloway, argued in support Of the Mr. Ws SMITH would not oppose the ;lotio n , previous question, which was carsied, on a division, but felt inclined to eay a few words, fora w e a he , by 137 to 47; Proxies included. I already passed. thought the facts; i co n !n e; A Protest against the decision was entered on the 'Lord Lake's preperty, at the perind nf Ins demise Journals, a nd signed by a considerable 'Limber of , ought to have been b etter known tha n they appeared.. .Peers.—Adjourned at half-past two o'clock. to he ; and though it was said Lent I. a`2 k b rolleht _ home 40,0001• yet he atclere.cod he had b ° • m ug h t HOUSE OF COMMONS. - * home 140,0001. Questions of this kind wtre rally carried by acclantation, P.:id it would be gene ' The SPEAKER having taken the Chair, acquainted the House ' m oc k . that he had received a letter from Mr. Bourchier, Deputy Clerk ' Wieser were a Committee previously appeinted to s ee of the Crown and Hamper in Ireland, acquaititing him that a pc- quire into the particulars of I.ord Lake's means. le tition had been lodged in his of fi ce, by General Hart, against the Lord Lake was poor, from neglecting opportuniese return of Mr. Montgomery, on the late election for the county of of emolument, he thought such afact wee the h . bri Donnegal. g e 't Some papers from the Nava l As y lum were presented, and or- jewell in his character. ..Still the Committee %% b tu. lured to lie on the table. know the facts—dignity ought to attach to a P • i LORD LAKE. but independence ou g ht also to appertain to it. Lord CASTLEREAGH moved the order of the Sir ARTHUR WELLESLEY said, that it ;try day foi the House resolving into a Committee to I very true that Lord -Lake was Very much in debt take into consideration his Maj est y' s Messa g e, reques- previous to his going to India, and to the discharge ting the House to make provision for the family of of those debts, the residue of his pay and appo int . the late Lord Lake. The Speaker having left the malts (after the necessary expetce of his establishment / chair, Lord Castlereagh addressed the Committee.— was deducted) was constantly applied, and paid eves He stated that he now came forward with a resole- to an Agent that came from England for that pu rpose, tion, in obedience to the King's message, and he As to the circumstances of Lord Lake's family, he trusted there would be little difficulty in persuading knew that his family estate only amounted to about the Committee to agree to what he should propose, as eOOl, a year; and that the money that he died eerie such grants had always been the practice of P arlia- was o n ly from 35,0001. to 40,0001. Such being the meet to bestow, especially upon men distinguished actual state of his circumstances, it was evident that for splendid military abilities—these abilities having the di g nity of the peerage could nox be sui ported by been crowned with success. A reason might he his successor, nor his family previded for, unlessen stated, why such an application as the present Led. House should agree to grant the pension. not been made before, and it was this ; the services Mr. WHITBREAD _said, there were radical ob. performed by Lord Lake, were in India, and prior jections in his mind to the erection of a monument to to his Majesty investing him with a Peerage, • His the memory of Lord Lake. He did not think Lord Majesty veaseherisfOre not aware of the necessity for Lake's services entitled to the distinction of pre-eme. the application, or that the situation of Lord Lake, in nent services: The huge estate bestowed on the great India, required any pecuniary aid or support to main- Duke of Marlborough was not given that &smote tarn and uphold the dignity conferred on him. Ano- hero because he was poor, but because his services titer thing ought to be stated on behalf of the late were pre-eminent. Lord Lake was certainly a gal. Lord Lake, the liberality of one branch of the Royal lant soldier, and his personal valour was highly yap Family had rendered him reluctant to press upon the thy of praise. country. Lord Castlereagh- went on to describe the Mr. LUSHINGTON said e that, as it was stated heroic atchievements of Lord Like, in early life, in that the fortunes of Lord Lake's daughters did nu America ;in Europe, at Lincelles ; and finally, in e xceed 150 0 1. he thought it would be much better Asia. is spirit, intrepidity, and personal bravery, give the sum of 90001. among the younger chilther were exemplary to a degree, and in every instance than to make it a present to the inheritor of thetiffe. where his army was engaged, did he personally ex- Sir FRANCIS BURDETT rose to enter his Fleet pose himself to danger. After eulogising his merits, against the grant. •He had two objections ; one a he stated, that with regard to the female part of Lord personal grounds, and the other upon constitutional Lake's family, his Lordship had left them little or grounds. The personal objection was this, that when nothing, 15001. a year. In consideration, however, an y individual came forward to claim a pension a of his Lordship's most eminent services having been the ground of services, those services should be d displayed in India, in 1803, it was intended to pro- very distinuished nature. There ought not to he e pose a pension of 20001 . per annum to the present necessity f or asking when and where those 'services Lord Lake, and to the two next heirs male, and to were performed ; but they should be services of • make this pension payable, from the 11th of Septem- brilliant kind, that the fame of them would ring ber, 1803. This arrear would make the proper ar- through the world. In the present circumstances of rangements for the female part of the family. After / the country, when the people of England were bar. that Resolution should be carried, he should follow it thened and exhausted with taxation, he did nutlet* up by another, for an Address to his Majesty, ena- that any extraordinary grants of money should • bling him to order a monument to be erected, to per- voted as a remuneration for services which were petuate the memory and services of Lord Lake. -in themselves of -extraordinary merit. This was . Mr. WHITBREAD objected to the Resolution. whole of the personal objection, as he did not deny He observed that the Noble Lord seemed to have la- that Lord Lake was a gallant officer, and had boured the matter much , and if such a reward was formed some services, although he differed with me . necessary now, how much more necessary was it in Honourable Members as to the valise of those services. 1803, when Lord Lake was alive and susceptible of —His great objection however to the grant was 7 . enjoying the dignities conferred on him, and the fiber,. constitutional grounds. He thought that his Majesty ality of Parliament at the same time. He had ano- had ample resources and means to reward every me ther objection to the resolution ; great and splendid rut of this nature, and that there was no necessity i rewards were always voted for eminent dervices, and applying to Parliament to lay a new burden upon ' he contended there was no comparison between the people. He should ask what had become deli , s:rvices of the late Lord Howe and the late Lord sinecures which were at the disposal of the Crown Like. He was sorry to learn that Lord Lake's fa. under the patronage . of Ministers ? Whenever _roily stood in need of such assistance. He should had been alluded to in that House, it was alwas not, therefore, object to the vote altogether, only he gued by Ministers, that these things so wer rewardee very did not wish to go to such an extent. sary, in order to enable the Crown Mr. W. DUNDAS supported the motion. It had services ; but whenever theic -were any eminent been said, that Lord Lake e while in India, had en- cos to be rewarded, instead of giving any of joyed high emoluments , and had various lucrative i places which it was pretended that they oughst o I appointments, but he . was lorry to state that Noble the patronage of, for the reward of emi nent services Lord had returned to England in a state of compa- the real reward was always made to come He y i m native poverty. an additional burden on the people. b sh o • Mr. M. A. TAYLOR. said he should not object to ask the Gentlemen on the other side, what I to the resolution, were it not for the pressure of the eminent services those were, for the reward of times. No man in the existing circumstances of the those things were given ? They were services [ country ought to load and burden the people—at the never saw the light—services which none but , same time he thought that something was due to the nisters knew any thing about. When, howeve.r, descendants of a gallant o ffi cer, whose whole profes- real service was performed, sienna applied to . a ddit ional stonal life for 30 years had been zealously devoted to meet to reward it, by laying burdens \ ' the service of his country. He und e r stood Lord Lake exhausted people. On this princ n iple he felt it his had returned with upwards of E 40,000 ,, but that was to take the settee of the House upo the motien, I not enough to support his daughters, who would only call for a division. As to the merits of Lord" be allowed £l5OO a year. The Committee pught to .he thought that was a very minor considerat do justice, and not suffer his family to . pine in obscu- Whatever the merits of that gallant officer mi rity and penury. The late General Dundas had lost the remuneration he received was not behind his life in i the cause of his country, and provision There wereany other gallant officers who had had been made for his family . Lord CASTLEREAGH exp lained, fermed serviceshich had been by no means • ded in the proportion that Lord Lake's had' General I'ARLETON supported the motion. It He believed, that if Lord Lake were now ale was a question dear to all who entertained ideas of ! could not consent to put in a claim for addo professional honour, and it was a subject -highly in- grants to reward his services, which grants teresting to the country at large. He then panegy- another burden imposed upon an exhausted rises( Lord Lake's valour in America, at York Town, If his merits.had been- so great , t he merits of' pie of England were not small. T he y had e and said that he did not return frcm India like Lucul- , lus, or a.; Massena from Italy. with unexampled patience to privatiensaad• Lord FOLKSTONE spoke aga inst the motion, of every kind, If all merit was to be reward' and said that it came forward on a very disagreeable was their merit to find its remuderation or re , i footing, namely, the poverty of the late Lord - Lake. The only reward which they could'- receive - I He could not think that assertion well founded, as he , the watchful attention of the House over tb, had been raised to a peerage for his eminent services. ', and to prevent any unnecessary burdens bei When such dignity was conferred on him, he surely sed on them. From these consideratione 1 was entitled to additional emolument. With regard his duty tc oppose the motion. ' to a monument to Lord Lake's memory he could not 1 TheCHANCELLOR of the EXCHF.QI agree, as there was, he believed, no instance of any the. Hon. Baronet might rest assured that structure of the kind, unless the person whose memory wouldeverlook most watchfullyto the King's it was intended to perpetuate died in battle. i but he surelyedid not mean to insinuate that Lord TEMPLE differed from the Noble Lord, case as the present the House ought to be nii and observed, he had never known a stronger claim parsimonious in • • . renardingeminent services I for services of great moment, 'rewarded by a poverty of peril and dismay. The amount of the King more honourable. The King was the fountain of all property was. unknown to him (the Chancellor honour, and it was the duty of the House not to suffer Exchequer) ; but the Honourable Baronet those honoured, or their descendants, to languish in not mean to say he did not know the limits ins poverty and wretchedness. . i sion List, which was tied down to no gr Mr. SUMNER stated that Lord Lake had gone 12001. a year, which would not yield :et ab' s hout. tl fir"' • : to en i ra l G ng op 141 ' tel • aigkr.o • tO th( r 4 L o ws () ek ; . • • : BO ' • to resist tetrosPec t 1 to , goes r sty , . to bo • , as tvith to ppOrt sucha tribi Seer kille e, and Lord GI onourabli to be b }he sere wport the 1. He though t k ie tt to 1 1 of the first t with resPe whose Ci 3 should ti e ma nner, il the fu i t gr. e n ot pretev • o f Lord mer its of l e if they w - a r i t uiv.••• it vice to a , at wed tl us , id he t] es to the I al. made an r. .trat a ca The t. t& the prof tot Lake. to k void< • tbe le. • stet poi& on SIN to Gni l 'd en ma 02 • is of a *saki any ern vices to a t hat , thong * . desen es of thee b ur . hove &lint on a be ‘, vote( e not t: fort' is the doct deny fas°' I p er . lA' many Bible upo• n then *Y his y me. rani ,sty ter hire' on the the those late • and hi m they `"c tys ar gin - neces- nati rninent ha a it servi- • net ,f those the to hare . Pet ervices , tea f;:a sv ch iolsetilki".rrl‘li‘nieahbdf P anMi lis ch:hi; • "usir:6lll° tb vs on an his &ay :„ icnt and h r d Lake/ r u sight ns n 1:60 nit e — . irr f nc• • tzsi t • he al must be pcoPle* ire, ) l s iw, rE, ne sufferings pwßfi r t ?saoespe ' :cit n g Lt Ministers 's proPer t9 • a t in sects niggardly fgl : ts • t :1:1 : 1P . e i joY 6 1: : TP o o d: ri n agi