Star. — London, England, 1823-02-03 00:00:00

LAW INTELLM.ENCE. . COURT OF KING'S DENCH, FEBRUAILI 1; TII9MTSON V. AUSTEN. This. was an action for goods sold ,and delivered, tried .before Mr. Justice 13arrbugli, at the Spring As sizes. for Cornwall, when the plaintiff recovered a verdict for 630/. slirrast Laster Term a Rule was obtained to shew cause why a new rand should not he had, on the ground that evidence was received of part of a con veritiois; held between a witness named Mahony and the defendant, to fix the latter with the debt, but that the Learned Jude refused to hear the re maiitiler'qf the Conversation, which might have ex-. plaided Ate meaning of the beginning. The debt was alleged to arisefiotn expenses incurred in reference td the ekctiotnof Mr..Attsten for a Cornish Borough. TheUtliti OttiseJvsnet threw 'out a strong re ' commendatiohto the parties to refer the whole mat ter; setae it amicahly out of Court. . The iatittigion, however, was not acted on, and The Cotiat, after hearing Mr. Wimit against the Rule; trtaJelf abiolUte, finless in ten Jays the parties should- settle . the difference, which was by far their ssisesiLcoterse. • rioittrx - iiii DENISE OF WILKINSON AND ANOTHER, O. IRO E. This was an action of ejectment, tried at the last Spring Assizes for the county of 13er ks, before Mr. Battii tarr6W. an the trial three questions were left to the Jury; two Of fact, and•the thii-d on the construction of the Annuitt'Act. , The Jury found a g eneral verdict for the defendant. The Learned Judge reported, that he requested the Jury, -in his charge, in case they should find for the defendant, to inform him on whieh• 'groikrid their verdict proceeded and that, when theydelivered their verdict, he asked the goes tiolt,:ltit- that they refused to give any answer. Upon this. Rule was obtained by Mr. Jervis, in last Easter Term, tritit new trial. The report having been read, 414 TAutivon assured the Court that his recollec tion of the circumstances differed essentially from the statement of the Learned Judge, and that the Jury fouild•tin all points' for the defendant. Mr. It. k. COistiN, on the same side, stated that he conceived the mistake to save arisen thus: that the Learned Judge, in his charge, requested the Jury to infoterohim. if their verdict proceeded on the third and• * that their giving a general verdict after this, proved that on the evidence they thought the ilerelice-satitfactory and 'complete. .Tllo•Leati °nee Josrice said that the greatest inceiVzetiiietlee'wovild arise from receiving any other account of the proceedings at a trial to contravene theittpert - of-thealtidger and therefore they must take the easennhie impreajort-ofitv bearings. The COutir.- after bearing Nr.•Ttunton against the !bile; • -• OinettretiASi vi - STAN t.gyi This was an'isitiewief - .trespaisfirbreaking into a coal-inkr+tf 'and itarryirteiway coals. At the Clielker to the summer 61 1:821, the case;raiitieaVaad a:Verdict given for the pliintiff, with 2 t 99oktlitntages. ihe Michaelnias Term shiw.eatise why theie Should not bo**tw. trio .Was -granted.- - • tiffernettjaatit eitots -WS uow heard in support of the ltalsh . , . Tier.,4)ouT were of opinion that the whole case was propeliy left to the Jury, -end that they -Could nut intatlkte with' their decision. • • • • The'ltitewas therefore discharged. itivinsWElA. b. tupcx AND OTHERS. The LOnIS tells Joirrict pronounced- the judg ment-of tilierCourtrill ibis base, "which was argued by Me% IR..Lailets . ftrettle *ptaintiff in Ttinity Term. It.' was an.aetitiii• of trespass brotight against Conimis; sioners .of- BanksVlA, for the false imprisonment of the:plaintiff, whom they had committed to Newgate, for net giving tatiVactiiry answers to questions put tolkins' %frheh Ondee 64inination befdre them. Mr. DOwdewell, the bankrupt, was brought up by Habeas Corpleafrabp the pritottito which lieliaci thus been constgaed;'an& . was discharged by the Court. He , afterwar'ds' blsougtir his action against the Corn snissieners, to Which, besides- the general issue, they pleaded' specialpstification, settingforth theirofEcial chartatet t 'OomrttfillEtiieri,'and the answers which thdy'tlWetted`titisatisliktdit and on'which they com mitted the phiinliff. To this plea there was a .deolur rerr rupees whir/Otero queistionsurdse--first, whether an- $.606411 tVespitiv'eduld be sustained:in any case against Commissioners, 'fbr insprisoning a bankrupt on answers deemed by them.unsatisfactory; and se condly, whether, if sO, the'ausWerin this particular eie sucll'a 'rt;itute -as m warrant the decition? The Conn+ *efe - novr- of opinion, that whatever miglit be the effect of the -pllintirs answers, this action could not leFsnrsported, It *as clear from a reference to the Statba; th#t the Commissioners were constituted 'the jtidifei 1;1'44 bankrupt's answers; and were invested power to commit whenever they were not satisfied with them. No action of trecpasretnildhe supported against persdns thtit in vested with judicial'Obtvet, for any' act done' within' the stop, of' theft authority. If . they exceeded that authority, from corrupt or malicious motives; an& not front a: mere 'error in judgmenf, liter *ere araehabtiv to The'ecrinthifil pithigeweee" liable to au action on the case, at Mit of tb'e aggritled,"for the • dXmitEs iddiecinehtiitl r1:111 %Kw' injuaiee ' , Mist on :thislettinhpoine, :the Cons% would give no positive ofinvost, alit •net iminediateir presented tb its Wettofftitlft.' The'colis4nititienh *IS Viet conclmitte stn tile iligtflhan/ kbe; by writ of habeas-60 , bring hilfr•cala take a Al' perior tribunal,:iittsd abisffe Ms awhile, - if pro ceedings ageffießthfif wirVertohtilattt": fit pterehtii 4 was SUffiCieln . thl*ltigt thYltr 0.0 b e alito: niissionert %rat' cite - attlfbritYi and thesefoie tJsn they-Asir, ritilfakT,.til the present action. - Theludgewe wad'actteidhaly'sieba 'feu the defendants. • , A11C1111.9 COl/1111", FEIMIV4BY 1. . DE urtOte tiveleassit lettle'fig.=-416../O. GILL. - TAW dust fUti'dttittlaby. h i s hritapfe, f iothd. hytlllf,l. • Gill agailizifre *so eritAti e h t fejui l iffor uf ic sidiniat etkel Mee le 14/ A d tai• - • a, re.. stitation. of t?oiltgie right*. In b ar f e y t l i t t • As i4 M r , ;1 Gill Owlet that hie vssfelladbelle gripes of aV9sltely.l Trieulsarae-seasielest, antlft/le Codtrgaiieliidgment,. that Mr. Gill had not only failed in thdTra64'b"dt ! , . . that the evidence had esntbuseed the innocence of elusion, he contended that. the.teepluct nt gm [ OM ' taken to Mr. petiolesSolite WOling vtiersesl tn, Ines Ides. Ides. Gill: they therefore seeteticed him. to Was the reverse of co -11 44We4, Ill'hich - tt ought to. longed to his sister, *fro had given it to him t o h to conjugal rigles, an d receive a pd ow her with fiat', belie I tilnitche WakkOtUliiilO Iliwee rem4siesesseit4l , invested for her - iit the roods. He ;sever had aa i ecneitigaf affiction. This sentence Wei pissed on the her hmlband, and that the Coen would thateforerelie. xnepeysof his own in'tli roads ; nor had he ever re. 4411 of ,Mai last. A ctifti fi cite was subsequently pre- miss the suit against him. ::- .' e i • • • ceived any part of the property from slos ce, of wheal Sented . by Mr. Gill, stating, thaehi lia s l received his Sit- Jolts NICIIOL ssid, when the Court Kw:o4d he did not know what had becosne. , • wife back-, and obeyed thesentence of the Court , and' , jirdginent on the Original complaint in this case, it The Coearieprobetesl the ceneloct of the insolverat lie prayed to be dismissed from the suit. This was was with strong* hopes that the parries would have in this transactioni:lnairthirridnrterbe *4 44 41 opposed by ribs. Gill, who denied that the sentence returned to their duties' toveards each ntl:er as hus- for fifteen months, and coil - W*4 v.ithia the wall s of the Court had b een com plied with, and prayed bAnd and wife, and towards their chi Pren as father i of the prison. .. -. • . - - that her husband might be pronounced in contempt, an d mot he r . I n the attempt to return to her rights, Matlifere Marcus Crestie appeared before the Coert add alimony allowed her. Mrs. Gill had certainly, in the opinion of the Court, to receive its jit,dgment,iheeiaminOidtitavin g tik oli 'Dr. Lusittsolos no* said, on behalf of Mr. Gill, not begun prudently, in sending a notice to the houses place on theiStli alt. when the_ lasniieiri tWits orpooli that he had done all he could to obey the sentence of keeper that she would take possession , instead of by- Mr:WALPoltsa, an helm)" dkiseelettuior s of - the Court; had received his wife back again into his having written first a conciliatory letter to her bus- Joyce,"deceased. . house ; that she bad left it forcibly against his will, band, to allay the feeling which possessed him, that It appeared from the inselvene's statement , ? l u l l , and that it was her own fault if she remained away. she had forfeited her rights as his wife, and the rim- had several transactions with the-late - Mr. Joyce, it • Dr. JENNER, on behalf of Mrs. Gill, denied that ther of his offspring. The Learned Judge proceeded which time he lived in Melina-451*c,, Westmii the sentence of the Court h a d been complied with.— at great length to give it as his opinion, that the de- road, being in the Rules of the King's Bench P r i g* . Soon after it had been pronounced, Mrs. Gili wrote lay of Mr. Gill in obeying the sentence of the Court, of which fact Mr. Joyce was perfectly aware. iffe to the housekeeper of Mr. Gill, who was then abroad, was not justified by saying that he contemplated an denied having ever represented himself as Being o a stating that she should, in conformity with the decree a pp ea l, as he had had sufficient time to make up his terms of intimacy with his Majesty and his Royal of the Court, prepare to enter into the exercise of her mind on that head, before he wrote the letter to his Brothers the Dukes of Yak and Sussex. :In e aat i, conjugal rights, and should enter her husband's servants, directing the treatment they should give nation of some length then took place into the trant house at Okel Court. She did present herself at the his wife, than which nothing was more reprehensible, actions between the insolvent and. the deceased; h k a house, and was admitted into possession by the house- particularly his having endeavoured to poison - the the Court did not think there was anything nerdeo s s keeper. In the meantime Mr. Gill, who had not minds of his servants against his wife, whose inno- against the former to call upon them to rem end hire, heard of the step his wife had taken, wrote to the cence had been proved, by making another charge of Messrs. Smith and Prais, clothiers, then ent ere d on housekeeper, telling her by no means to admit her, criminality against her. What could be more inju- their opposition in pi rson. It appeared by th e i r seat ,. or any of her friends, to the house of Okel Court, as rious than this charge, which he did not attempt to meat, that the insolvent obtained credit of th em s ot she had no right there whatever; and adding, that he prove ; or than his groundless attacks on her chain- clothing, stating, on making the application, he was believed her object in wanting to come there,' was to ter, iu the face of her own servants? This, in itself, is person of considerable wealth and that his b lat h er he near a Gentleman with whom he Was sure (he said formed a charge of very great . cruelty on his parr.— was. Lora Lieutenant of one of the Islands a b roa d, ih confidence) she had been for some years impro- Allowing that there had been colouring on both sides, and that he (the insolvent) was very well ac qsa i nns s perly connected. When he learned that Mrs. Gill the Learned Judge said, that the conduct of Mr. with persons of high comideration in the State. had-been admitted into the house, he wrote a second Gill to his wife, on his return to his house at Okel Mr.. POLLOCK, for the insolvent, said, th a t if per _ letter to the .housekeeper, directing her not to let, Court, was against either the laws of the country or sons would be incautious enough to give credit to either her or her servant have any provisions, not to of religion, or common humanity. In taking his wife such as were resident in the Rules cretin Kin g ' s B enc h, allow any friends, or any one whatever, to come and horn. he was bound to treat her as his innocent wife, they ought not to come there and complain of f ram e see her, and lock the doors of all the rooms in the for she had been proved to be innocent; he was He hoped the Court would remember that his client house, except a drawing-room and bed-room, and put bound to admit her to his bona fide residence where had (whatever extent of fraud there might b e , if any padlocks on those doors of which she did not possess himself and his children really resided :he was" existed) suffered by anticipation—as he had been in the keys. Hi at the same time sent a written notice bound to admit her to the joint and reasonable con- prison upwards of three years. to Mrs. Gill, stating, that if she went on any of his trail' of their children and the servants : and until In delivering judgment this day, the Cuter Costs premises in Herefordshire, he should treat her as a she did that which forfeited her rights, he was bound faissiosta observed, that the Learned Counsel, Mr. wilful trespasser, for it was not only against but by the vow which he had made at the altar, to love, Pollock, had laid great stress on the length of time abhorrent to the law, if she went on any of them , comfort, and honour her. The law did not allow a the insolvent had been confined, but it should he re , without having his consent. The servants of the husband to treat his wife at his caprice, and would membered; that during part of such te r m, th e in house in Okel Court did, however, give Mrs. Gill protect her from anything which could in law be cnn- solvent had lived and appeared As an osten s ible re . and her servant such provisions as she required.— sidered as c ruelty. The very first act which Mr. Gill sident in Conduit -street, MOntague-square, Sic. als On the Iseh of A ugast, this Gentleman, who had re- had exercised towards his wife was one-of suspicion. though it turned out, that. for such breach of pies presented himself as having been perfectly ready to In what respect suspicious? He had no right tb enter- vilege, he had been for. several months confined ia obey the sentence of the Court, came home. Mrs. tarn suspicions against his wife, whose innocence had Horsemonger-lane gaol,, on, the \l ash:Ws warrant,. Gill was sitting in the-parlour. He entered the room been proved; and the act of forcibly searching het' per. for a misdemeanour. There had been considerable* in a violent passion, seized her by the arms, and son for letters was one of gross insult and degradation; want of caution on the part of the opposing creditors, shook her violently. He then insisted upon seeing and the act of locking her in the room, one of unjusti- but at the same time - they had made out a case whi c h the letters and.papers she had about her person, and fiable duress. The act of dragging her back was an the Court was bound to notice. The conduct of the demanded the keys of her boxes. She hesitated, but aft of- violence, and of unwarrantable violence.— insolvent had been , fraudulent and in•ustitiables he seized her pockets before she could comply, and The act of restraining s ber to her room, and allowing therefore the judgment of the Court was—that he be commenced a search upon her person. She triedto, a servant only to speak to her at the door to receive remanded for six months, for faudulently contracting escape from him at the door, but be locked it, and orders, what was that but solitary confinement? The debts with Messrs: Smith and Prais. detained her. She was obliged to cut her pockets' whole formed what in law would be considered acts of off to give them to him to prevent his violence, and cruelty, and cruelty, connecting it with other circuMs, ultimately was forced to jump out of the window on stances in the case, for which the Court would grant- the lawn, where he followed her, and treated her her a divorce, had that been her prayer. The husband's with great violence. He ordered that one bed-room saying that he had received, or would receive, his wife should he allotted to her, with one parlour, and de- back, and restore her to her-conjugal rights, would need her her own servant, and appointed ancther to riot do; they must be satisfied that them was a real attend on her; but this, however, was not allowed to restoration. Upon the whole transactions of the first enter the room, - or have any conversation with her, day, the unfounded charge; the acts of violence but desired merely to take orders at the door. On a against the wife were such as*Would, if she prayed second- occasion, Mrs. Gill was put under great it, induce the Court to order her separate and per., alarm by . her husband entering the room in a furious manent alimony. The Court, however, refused to manner with a knife; and when she asked for water, accede to his prayer, and to dismiss the suit. They being unwell, he seized it with the evident purpose ordered that - he should allow her alimony from the of throwing it over her, saying, " I'll faint you, with time that she had been compelled to quit the house ; the devil to .you." At length she was obliged to and as the charge diclaring her husband to be in send for her solicitor, with whom she left the house contempt was not pressed, the Court would hold over of her husband, findipg that it was impossible to live that part of the case in order to allow the interven with him. - He bad told her that she must go with tion of friends to. Make an amicable arrangement, him to his house in Wales, at a place called Rhiva- which would be the most beneficial, as it was per raha, and from thence to a islace where he said she fectly hopeless, after, what had taken. place, that the might pray for, her, sins, but she refesed to go with; parties could again live together and fulfil the duties him to Wales. The affection of Mrs. Gill for her - h us- of father and mother with h a p p i ness towards eeek band and for her children was 'still so great, that, other, or benefit towards their children. Ali istevy notwithstanding her treatment, she was desirous of was therefore pronounced to be due to the wife, and ~ living with him. The treatment as proved by the the quietion of contempt left open. • evidence was the reverse of that which the *Court Mr. Gill, who was present, .and displayed great would expect from him, but she did not wish to press agitation clueing the delivery of th e j u d gment b y hi e the point to the extent of declaring him in,conteropt Lordship , declared that h e was rea d y to rece i ve b ac k of th e Court. It was not intended to prescribe te the his wife if she would, return, and would havens. Court in what manner Mrs. Gill meat he treated; ceived her long since. - . all that was asked was, that she might be protected, Sir J. %cooks-After what took place on' your if she could not remain in safety with her husband, return, it can hardly be 'expe c ted o f h er t h at th e who ought to be obliged to . pay . hee alimony from :bau go backs the time his conduct had driven her from home, Mr. Gill was,about,to enter into some further state- Dr, LUSHINGTON, in behalf of Ar. Gill, said that, ment, when another cause vvasproceeded in. although the Court assigned the huihand to treat his wife with conjugal affection, yet s asfa r . as hisfeelings INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT.. ' i were concerned, it was not n the power of that, or Saturday, Jo'sqh Bunning was opposed by Mr. any other Court in the world,, by, their sentence, to Ilium on behalf or a woollen-draper named Clay, alter them. Mr. Gill bed a suspicion, of ,his , wife's an d WilliaM &lilting, the . insolvent' s b ro th er ; an d fidelity; it was unfortunate that he believed her to .also, by a perspa - named( Taylor, in person. have been unfaithful. Now- he (Ds. Lusbingten) The,r)ollif elflebkh the insoltent's brother rested -; . in the Sic.— contended that Mrs. Gill had pot behaved aX ;be was his opposition, namely, his havin g d e p os i te d t h e l ease • .. •ri le n es . Jame.._ bound to have done, to allay thosi feehoge of ; her, c'f ! I) 9l l sei of which the brother was a j oint p ro p r i e - .stone aged 69. husband. At the tiine Mr. Gill. wrote ow to his 'toe with him, iii. hands of a creditor of his own, The key. John.'" , housekeeper not to"adtnitisis wife,, he con te mplated as, sectirity fersirrdebe, the Court declared to be a•fit 5.m. 24, ar.' .. of St. P." an ipPtial - frottilhe sentence Of the Ceert, - Sand bird subjeet'for a Must ofEquity. • the'- made home offers for. a coinpromiSe, which 'it svould I*. Jerman, clerklo Mr. Clay, then stated, t h at * laic been - much better to ): s ave accepted. Supposing, the in s olvent asked credit of his employer fora per sbeiiiiiiee, thatlfr. Cliff had 'refused, iti the, first - in- son named Joyce,. to the imonnt of £2OO, of which . salsa, I'cCoLei tlk, strittineeof'the:Cottrt; i t:to disS he would guarantee' the payment. He:represented ebiditilite was putgecibi iubsecrie4t obedignei. •It himself as the "pt'sielletor of houses in Mary-la-bOnne, weenot - the Ply tailiwy thefeelings of Mr:Gill:that end of money. in the liunds e and referred to Mr. *I'M! !lid Ito • "lit . ten'clitlg"a notice to his BNienes Stoeli,b • *.*. . stiiiidiiit' ' • " Ed tike PO . stesillin o f the "If - l' ' ' I.' i . mi x ed .ofthis '' representation, instal ~s'. , itcol4l,iatOry_ietter t o . tZ heithesbaititi "Ne, was - her nation in delivering • k iskiref - ktlift i thrtrif lb . codcdtat t eithitl for lead . h c Rim) *Whom he stated to have trans business fer himself and his family. In consi quence. . the witness was sent to tnA t e incimry o f , Mr. Bourne; who informed him that he ad purchased stock for some of the insolvent's vete insi si ci t e oo ltr oht l im i. r s tio.o o o to family, and that lie himself had been with him that suak'as'weii; : ispOlt tfie . rice. Of', theml.susPicioas. , morning to invest I:500 for_him, which he had post.; YrdieniletreAletiair orbobilf of hlr-Gili„it appeared potted doing for a few days, in the expectation-.of thif ifts Ead'fdlldted - iitilbour the tease, thing purchasing at a lower price. Upton hearing this ac' irrtitiatl'aiuit i h rifiliSO t t e lse at. 6is . iou l d i . count of th e insolvent, Mr. Clay agreed to receive hia' ia Wale% au:On-growl . 114ti l iwa 4 1 4 . 4444 .2)n d acceptance as security,.and give Joyce credit upon it tMinhabited. Country, - was, tockwitilout a justi6cativa; for such clo th . as he (Jos ce), who was a tailin s should for Vhe'had"turi `tight tiS Jbreseribt ' to her hatband 'require _from . time , to time. He according reccivegi ‘ viZte:he.slitinid;live , :iihOckisip s e besidevyst 04' iii oleds to the : argount of t 12:, , and then further : craii, ..,:-... Fi n d b i fixe li vec two any ieaki. The E tta ,%caf, refeseekbimS The insolvent .p . as also reftised "I " °'" of leer quitted the house against die, consent. ~.trußicity 4 cloth, which_ 'idle; sr - 4ain talking Of bit s `of lacifusband..must. the, Learned Cella el 4 ....-4 *iunded s prOperty he preposid taiqug to mod to lei; J , . rg aßi , •, , • preclude bar from any relief :from the .Croat._, 'Hi t hilel l g.ie . Oportos who woald : let him have .wini in iciviefiyjslied thattbsts Witi-no principle in the.pr4c...tetigo., The bill at its.mataritivitiiCslishoOptited, and s pi . • ace of tilt Coitst iliac *eat to direc t srbe4 . k h e i x $ll4 !Joue,w as nor, b e f ound., ~ -.- -- ... , ,•_ I 'teace shouln, in lama coo p PO Il i fiNgfd,j A 1 4 14 ;oft. The insolvent said, that the gjoo whicii fie ,tia - BIRTHS. fo Pemberton-row, Gough-square, Mrs. Lowe, of t soft, lin. 14, at North Shields, the wife of the Itrr. W. I L Stowell, of a daughter. 4ately, at Dundalk, the lady at Major Phipps, et a 5, et MARIUS°. At Witicanton, the Rev. .W..IL Maltby, RD. Rector of Durford, St. Peter's, Canibritigeshire, and late Fellow of Caws C.lnistl College, Cambridge, to Sophia, eldest daughter el Mt. J. Randall, of the former place. 4t Stanmesre, the Rev. C. Palmer, of tadbroke,in Wawa- , shire to Lady Charlotte Finch, sister to the Fad of Ayleder& The Rev. Henry Arthur Beckwith, M.A. Vicar of St. lii. charl-le.llelfrey's,.and,the Minster, York,tollary, eldest *laugh. ter of Mr. Pewnall, llatton.gardeu, London. • Lately, in Jersey, the Rev. Edward Durell, A. M. Rector et .St. Saviour, in that . Island, to Mary, youngest daughter of The. mas Anthoine, Esq. of Loogueville, io the sarae Wand. Wednesday se'onight, at Carlisle, the Rev. J. Wilkins, B.A. of Ilpffron Walden, Essex, to Jane, eldest da ug h ter o f M r . A. Graham,, New Brewery. Wednesday, at West Bergh*lt, Essex, the Rcv. Arthur Oick too, of liadksmere, Kent, to Susan, eldest daughter of the Il e s. W. E. Sims, Reetot of West Bergllolt aforesaid. Jan. 24, at Ellaston, Staffordshire, John Duller Yard Buller, Esq. of Oriel College, Oriftud, to ,Elizabeth, daughter of. Tho mas Bal Witson, R.sq. of Woottob Park; _Staffordshire, and Beak k Lancashire- At Ballina4oe Chuck Surgeo4 Barrett, of the Galway, se Oman to Charlotte,. daughter of the _late Walter Davies. floe. of Lanincli, county of Clans • August 1; at St. Thomas's Church. Bombay, Captain Rd.. rick Jamie Maclean, of ,his Majesty' s 65 t h Regiment of I.ight Infantry, to: : Robins Jane, eldest daughter of Major Debut Tlitoger Hough, Deputy Military Auditor -General, Cooishds. • At his house, in Barton Crescent, the Rev. T. E. - Piot:Um late- of; flhlbley, Gloucestershire, and Rector of Uley, in the same County. At Mite:it; at Charicott, in Warwickshire, aged. Saobe Rev,.. .John Luby, a descendant of the Lutys,eo intimately connected with the earty.biography of Shakepeare. At Hagbourn, Berke , aged 63, the Rev. John &Witt% ti "years Vicar of that Parish. • • The Rev. John Skinner D.D. Rector of Poulshot, and 41. _years Vicar of Salisbury C athedral. The Rev. Wm. Wade, B.D. Rector of Lilley, Iferthand.of Impingfon Cambridgeshire, and f ormer l y F e ll ow o f . S t . J o h n ' s . • 'College, (Sambridge, The former Rectory is in the itattOntP of the Master and redo*e of that Society, and.the latter in that . of the.flein and Chapter of. Ply. - The Rev. James Andtsw, of rovdton Maticheits, Nfld stone aged 69. The . . Bev. John. Darke, :Rector. of KAI, _Devon._ • • Jan. 24, aged 93, the Rev. Stanhope Bruce, M. 4. fottlealrfne: of St. Petcr's College, Cambridge, and Vicar of Ingiothain, the counties of Wilts and Berk', for nearly fat - • Saturday se'nnight, aged 75, the...Rey...1.. Winter., 3i" .IM • l'astor at the Independent Clutch, at Nevablity. Bear: • • ; The Rev. Daniel O'Crawley, aged 76, .upwsrds ' Parish Priest of Bantry. Tuer.day sennight, in Limerick, the Rev. Mr. Wagratiat rat - of St. Patrick'. pafisb,4 , .i4,Nionake.... • Jan. 9, at Glasgow, the Rev. Ned Dangle/. aged 73. • The 27th ult. at Lee, in Kent, Catherine Aiwa, ekkAidanilh' - : ter of the late Adam Baild e n, .D. of the lion. rim' . la& , Company's servi ce , St. H e lena. ' Jan. 23, at Guernsey, aged .30..afteiNa- lingering Liam_ "Iced I.e itlarchaut )•:, q. LL.B. and F. ( LEis only snit Jot ~4 0 41 10 1 1 r: Le . Marchant, Esq. of 13eanntoot . Lorige e (1ure:1544 J Jan. 24, at his seat,.near R at h coo l e , age d 13, illiKtattle, Esq. late 'ALP. for the county of 'Dublin" and Lieut.-Chimed at the county of I)uhlin • - Lately, at an advanced age,. Alta. Fitebi,.yrldow of %Mr. Steels. fdeaneely Master of Amnion Bcisool.. • la& • an. our* ttblin • ' 'aterforil 0 0 r Jersey . 0 0 1' tp 2 1 0 • 0- •.. I . Haziebisrik 0 *lll4 Plamierr • . , Matta - 1 d A 0. d • Gotranburgh 0 Brazil • 0 • -•— • shim . • . merks l ilUki,-W4.l . kltAt 44:104)6 .4 4 .1h30,111#4.:01114 11 . Idr nstryg . . 4 • • .0 ' '71.1 lat. ~ nor 7 • Aft :,,,ints t • 1,. . . 10 Pllnettot Aft;:r a IA _ . LUli DUN l'runrd and puhlaalkai by 1.4x.u.. Rao; rile.!9: , • place, Tample- Hat, !