Star. — London, England, 1823-07-01 00:00:00

. •.err. ./e \ PARE, ['WENT A RW AOC BiDINGS. HOUSE OF LORIP, e 3UNE 30. This morninjt their Lordshipwaiset at: ten o'clock, when tO appeal of " Atkyns v. Wright," velis heard out ; and the judg went is expected on Wednesday. At four o'clock the "House adjourned during pleasure, and resumed at five. The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, that before their Lordships came to the business of the day he wished to move the•secesnd reading o a series of Bills—namely, the Labour of Convicts Bill, the Felonies Mitigation Bill, the Capital Punishments Re peal Bill, the Larcenies Bill, and the Sentence of Death Bill— while he would shortly state the general purport of the proposed measures, With respect to the first Bill, it had hitherto been cuszomary to employ convicts on board the Hulks; but the pie sent na 1 would enable his Majesty to employ such convicts as happened to be under senterke of death either in the Colonies, on or anywhere abroad. The second Bill provided for an aboliti of sentence of death in particular cases. It was provided by another Bill to abolish several capital punishments, while it had been endeavoured to combine all the laws respecting the de struction of machinery. Capital punishments were thus abo lished In most cases, hut arson excepted. There was another BiU, which emanated from the best consideration that could be given to the subject, by which the Judges were empowered to abstain irons pronouncing sentence, and, according to circum stances, to record the verdict. He wished that the whole of the DM, which were intended to accomplish what, upon the best consideration, all awned to agree ought to be done, should be read & second time, and afterwards be committed fur to-mor row.—The motion was agreed to. - ._ Mr. LENNARD, Mr. Ii tt OODIN, Mr. P. Moose, and otners, brought up the Rio de se Laws Amendment Bill, the Sidney Sum: College Estates Bill, the Southwark (Town ant( Bo rough) Court of Requests Bill, and the Assessed Taxes Cons- position 1111 (which was included by mistake in the Rcyal As sent of Friday last), with the Amendments as agreed to by the other Heine. Upon *c motion of Viscount Metxtr.t.x, the Scottish Turii pike Roads Bill passed through a Committee, and was reported without any amendments. The Carl of SHAFTESBURY presented a Petition from the Pariah of St. Olave, Southwark, against the New Condon Bridge ISill ; which Petition was ordered to be referred to the Commit tee now sitting for the purposes of the said Bill. PENSION TO LORD ST. VINCENT. The Earl of LIVERPOOL moved the considera tion of his Majesty's most gracious Message, as com municated to their Lordships on Friday last. The King's Message was then read !rem the Wool sack, as follows: •' GEORGE It " His Majesty, taking notice of an Act of Parliament, which has made provision for extending to the Viscount St. Vincent an finuity granted to the late Earl of St. Vincent, and the heirs male of his body, and being desirous that a pension granted to the iced. Earl by the Parliament of Ireland should be extended in like manner to the Viscount St. Vincent, recommends this ob ject to the consideration of the House of Lords." The Earl of LIVERPOOL was persuaded that little more remained for him, in pursuance of the gracidus Message just read to their Lordships, than tO move that an humble and dutiful Address be presented to his Majesty, assuring the Sovereign that the House of Lords would cheerfully comply with the request conveyed in the Royal Message. It was not, he should observe, now intended to create a new pension ; for it should be recalled to the recollection of their Lordships that his late Majesty had, before the union with Ireland, been in the habit of recom mending fit rewards for the services of distinguished individuals, by pensions from both countries. This was particularly the case as regarding the late Ad mirals Viscount Duncan and the Earl of St. Vincent; the laiter, in consequence of the King's Message to the Parliaments of England axed of Ireland, were ho noured with the pensions of £2OOO per annum eacl from England, and £lOOO from Ireland. It so oc curred that the Earl of St. Vincent had no son, ad, therefore, in the year 1806, it was recommended to Parliament to attach this meritorious grant to his nephew, now Viscount St. Vincent; but this MOM.. mendation did not, of course,' take into its contem plation the annuity froni Ireland, as the union of countries had taken place. The object of this appli• cation was merely to enable his Majesty to do that only which was intended at first. He entertained no manner of doubt that, under such circumstances and representations, their Lordships would feel dispnseil to act with that spirit of liberality so properly re commended in his Majesty's Message. The Marquis of LANSI)OWN, in seconding the motion, bore his testimony, from the best of his re collection, to the statement made by the Noble Earl.' —lt was true, certainly, that Parliament had nor, in 1806, been called on to renew the pension as it re spected Ireland; but his own impression was that, had Parliament been applied to at that period, the exten sion would have been agreed to The motion was agreed to unanimously, and the Address was ordered to be presented to his Majesiy by the Lords with white staves. MARRIAGES ABROAD. Lord HOLLAND addressed the House. He stated that be understood , there was a Bill now upon their Lordships table, for rendering valid such marriages as had been solemnized in Russia since the dissolution of the British Factory. The principle of the 13i11 cer tainly had his entire consent, as far as it went ; but he wished the same principle of validity to be ez tended to all marriages in foreign countries, such befog once solemnized in the houses or Chapels of our'Am bassadors. This was demanded by justice, by wisf, dom, and by policy ; and, as the laws of England were founded on those principles, he hoped and trusted that measures would forthwith be taken in or der to remove all suspicion of the validity of .Our .. marriages in foreign parts. This placed the families, of persons who married abroad in rather a perilous state; and when it was seen, during this Session, due so numb of the marriage contract had been taken from the common law, and placed in the Statute Book, he hoped that at least some distinct pledge ' or rather; some solemn dictum, would be given by Parliament so as to lay this subject of disquietude more com pletely at rest. He hoped, that considering the dis via t and jealousy which attend the solemnization of matrimony when abroad, same declaration to the con trary would be.notified this Session, as preliminary to some enactment in the next, He hoped that the time was not far off when the law itself would re move all doubts respecting the marriages of British subjects in foreign parts. Lord COLCHESTER agreed with all that had fallen from Noble Lords upon the subject of provid-, log for the validity of -English •Marriages in foreign parts. He hoped that another Session• would ndt be• suffered to elapse without the passing of a decla-, zatury law upoo to.lmppoortant a subject. ; The Earl of LIVERPOOL said, le concurred with: tl.e Noble Marquis (Lansdown), and his noble Friend (t..clichester), on the cross bench, with regard to reaJet ing quite ralichhe marriages of British subjects when disparagement m,-.A ` •l . _. abroad. He apprehended thet ikw seen nizetincißl4firla Mt , arskead Y a lit!! ;00. e r r. t "S t e - ift.iages s :;,;,•_, slmparseop.,t rest upon the res 4 u . ;FLIT!WfWe brills itisli ate' My My , a etherefite /ski t eoslegnasst, if indiganw A ' h. : fl c l tetg i: ' • ab/4redieivs of fo- ; -tie* tist,;siarfantable in nsy l itelf„at't* language POO j' . in nf itst ,itlf eb reign Stakes, shell parties then . ~ I t 1 r e s idint theh - e, were by some professional men 4isewbere,whee mention is, e observed made of the non-effect -of appCalina from ,tke, Lord, siOd here. But titer Lotddnpit utast v it distinctground; Chancellor in his own Court to the Lord Chancellor that the present Bill went upon a ~ ..,, . proceeded on *suned prinei . p , 'MC • Te That Marriages inthis rinse H e the-Noble. and-Learned Lord ,which, though nominally as 4 1, to 'tussle, instanced the cases in * had been quasi as in England, with reps; _ • such marriages being solemnized by. thnOn plain of Appeals from the Cm:l.a Charkcembe had nothing el lto do but Is * from the ' the British Factory in Russia ; and;here...accor ing y, . sign ; as,, or "pp the question to be a ffi rmed was, whether- such mar- Vice-Chanceliox and j tltOlaster of ;Ole 11,ons).—And • • va lid when the Factory had been put an can your Lordshjps. ,once .. aiippoe. that , any . Inn, stages were entire end to, though solemnized by the Chaplainper holding 'the high' and re:Tonsil:4 trust of Lord Chats : ' se? If, therefore, the measure could be agreed en.by cellor would not corne t eveu foam hisown jurisdiction ' their Lordships, it might be better to apply it, in to this House, the 'dangler . revert or justice, with a future, to all such marriages when solemnized in con" mind open to conviction, and anxious to correct pre formity with the laws of foreign States. conceived errors?' It is to be 'numbered .as aniong4t my misfortunes, Lards that I have always sou ht ' The Earl of LAUDERDALE held the question of alr .A . , . . g . marriages to be distinct, when solemnized by the En- information, that I,lievekept.an.open ear to c . oneic 7 iron, th' I h '. at I. bane been f o re most to adm it and aFictigy- ' glish Factory Chaplain, or, on the other hand, by the. Chaplain to the Embassy. ledge truth,: from whatever:quarter it came. , I can that suppose, too well, that persons May talk -lig , htly-itt' The LORD CHANCELLOR here remarked, Westminster Hall, who never set foot in the Court of it remained a question with himself; how far the most Chancery, and know nothing of. the business to be doubting men would even haie entertained thedoubts transacted there; but, I . t.it, cap ever .such. per- expressed by some of their Lordships, had the Itlarri eke sons think that an individual in the elevated', but re laws remained as they were; but it was clearly r sponsible situation of Lord Chaticeller,, woold ,refuse the:r Lordships to decide whether the present Bill to correct an opinion he had formed in error? ' it is should or should not pass ? 'He could only say " f or for this reason that, throughout theprotracted ciatirsv himself that.he,never had once harboured a single of my judicial life, I have always held it a shay, to doubt reipecting die lawful:marriages. of subjects of state all the reasons;n from first to last, owhieb my* this cciiintry though abroad, while . such marriages decisions were grounded '; and ',l now defy any man were selemnized in the chapeli, Or even the houses of i o . the country, who haseier once suggested a. douht ' our Ambassadors; nor had he once doubted that the . to me, during an investigation of mowent,, that marriages . of British Subjects while ibtoia, when ac- would say I had not thanked him for that single cording with the respective laws of those States in doubt. And I will say this, my Lords, not pet which they resided, were valid in English law. What sonally but officially, that it is not proper,.when men he objected to, therefore, was, that the present Bill hold important posts in the State, and it does not be declared doubts which . never had existed, while it had long to others, who know nothing of their situation, not the merit of laying them. m to throw out imputations, not against a great Judge The new Bill, for rendering valid the British ar- (for Ido not pretend to call myself one), but against riages in Russia, then passed through a Committee, the administration of justice in a particular Court.-- and was reported without any amendments. . Having said so much for myself, and here I must LOrd HOLLAND gave notice of his intention to hi- entreat the indulgence of your Lordships, I now, come trod:ice a specific Bill (the Noble Baron did not say more immediately to 'the question : and here I must when) to render more valid the marriages of subjects say, distinctly, that although I should not remain ' when solemnized in foreign parts. one hour longer in office, yet, if your Lordships APPELLATE JURISDICTION. • think my opinion of any weight, I shall feel h;und The Earl of 'LIVERPOOL moved the second to assist your Lordships in conducting the judicial • reading of the Bill for appointing a Commission far business of this House.. But, my Lords, unless some re- Inquiry into the Judicature of Scotland, with especial form is made in the proceedings oldie Court of Session, reference to the Court of Session in the matter of nothing will be done.. It so happens that the people ' Appeals from the same. of England have, I know not.how, a system of ju -1 The above Bill was immediately read a second risprudence not.ettualled in any country ; but, my ' time, and ordered to be cemnaitted for to-inorreiv. Lord‘thereisi wik cliffeifnce in the two countries. : . The Earl of LIVERPOO 1, not mowed the initia- England h as a .C out t Of Equity and a. Court of Law, ' tory Resolution proposed:to the LOW Committee, to and one Cciurt so informs . the other as to prevent', 1 whom was referred so much of Report made to those anomalies which we find in the jurisprudence ' this House on the 17th of Jane, as relates to the at- at Scodand. I remember, with gratitude, the ad- I tendance of Noble Lords; and the means of enforcing vice given me, when very young, by the late Justice 1 the tame. - Gould. He said to me—" Scott, you're a young man. . The Earl GROSVENOR objected to the corn- you are a mere Tyro at the Bar. Do you aspire to 1 pulsatory attendance that was about to be inflicted; practice in a Court of Equity? If you do, I advise I but, on.the • other band, he had no objection to the you to make yourself master of the law first, and, ' appoiatmeat of a Commiksinn of Inquiry. When it with a good stock of law, you may proceed to a Court was required to be present five days during each of Equity." Here his Lordship commented on the ' week, instead of three days, the requisition. must be a proceedings of the Court of Session, whose forms he matter of great inconvenience at the commencement censured, and observed, that half the Appeals brought' of a 'Session. Was it ascertained; or certain, that before that House were on account of the Judges of three Lords, withopt a penalty, could be procured to the Court of Session not giving the reasons of their attend five days, as they already did three days ? If judgment. If, my Lords, correspondent measures that failed, time enough still remained to enforce the are not taken with respect to Scotland, all your mea penalty of gso, for non-attendance . • ' sures here will be ineffectual. It is evident,. that in Earl MANVERSfollowed on the same side. Scotland the Jury Court do not understand the pro- Lord ERSKINE thott . ght it improper that the /Pi cess of Trial by Jury, as your Lordships have seen should hare passed to its second stage witheitt a in the case of Lord Fife; the institution is tea recent word. What, in effect, was it bat precisely in tran- for them, and they do not understand the Workin g of script of the 6th andlth pages of the Committee's it. Another remedy, my-Lords, I havebeen told, is to Report ;_and . Which, if •folloWed u(, by the appOint- introduce a C ourt ' o f Error in Scotland; but I un ment of proper persons iti - Corrimissioriers'of Inquiry, derstand that this is iniracticable, What then is to would not leave their Lordships much longer in be done,? It seems thata delay in Appeals is attri trouble. If the Bill passed, 'their Lordships would buted to my doubts; yet I:hope I shall not suffer by 'derive great assistance from their communications comparison with any man who. has sat as my prede- With the enlightenediudges of the Court olSessiOn • teasel-in the Court of Chancery, or in this House. — who, 'if well attended to, Might suggest thclih am- Let .your Lordship's hde reflect on• the accumulation ' sures most likely to lessen • dt.e number , of Seititi(dt and length of Appeals in these latter years. Look Appeals. But, again, what Must be dodo In the only to the Roxburgh, the Banbury, and Berke meantime? He would say—nothing; lettheir Lord- ley causes, Which had no parallel in 'duration, as ° ships go on as Well as they Valid- lle;fot eine, never Contrasted with for Mer times, and you will appre wouldconsent to th - e egthoefilling of the House;' and elate the situation of the individual who had• to de he saw no remedy but by impounding tlii.l.lcibleand t id e them; When, -my Lords, I look at the. ai re:ar Learned Lord tiptoe the.WOUliack, .siod,trialchtg it in of causes, I hope thatsomething will speedily be done. • that Noble Person a breach of priiilege to. be absent *Ny,:gporal life, at I observed before, cannot last from that House—yieer, heer).—As *to deputed re- l tif • and my judicial life ought not to last long; niedies, their Lorddife a siit was certain, might proceed therefore, if any of your Lordships have any to the appointment of aDe my Speakeiv; but could thing better to propose, let it be proposed amt. Whew they secure, by such an arrangement, a deputy I 1 first appeared at the bar IWas employed in Scotch_ Hearer? Could they be certain of any one competent causes; when I became a Judge 'in, the Court of . to 'the judicial prOdess of their House? fie believed C ommon Pl eas , I atten a i i t o„scosch causes th en; , that he kneW something of the lAttis of_ Zn.glind, but When I was out of offi c e, an d 1 believe even then that he confessed to be as ignorant of the Ocutbah. Law as . no man could accuse me of negligence, I attended the a native of Mexico. At * his advanced stage of exist- Scotch appeals in this House. I have, therefore, given ence; ItuVi'abave the age of seventy, he found he deep consideration to Scotch causes, and have the could be of little gsetetheirl f ordships in the hearing vanity to suppose that my opinion may have some of Scotch Appeals, as his early practice at the . Bar weight. But, my Lords, with respect wilt* arrear : *lien from the Scottish • of business' in this House, ere we never to her a The 'LORD 'C,If gicgt.toß, thou g h inaudible Lord 'Keeper. of the Great Seal again? The qUeition in many sentences, tip 4e je general to•the following is, in fact, whether your Lordships can point out or effect :—" My Lords, lam desirous not to appear too adopt a better plan than that proposed to - you ? imminent:on this occasion, though after what has Anfather.qttestion . is, if will suffer the. lieges of , fallen from the Noble alid.LearnedLiardnearu" who Scotland to remain as they are? for if yeu . do this, it states that his age must iecapacitate him'frons *tip& .. is telling the peopieedlEngl an d and beh i nd they u ill ante in this *use, I canoot . keep . entiOY in the haven() rensedyji tom.. tribiturd. • As it respetts the! backlroend. Of this lam petiectlyinre• that if Court ef.Chaneery;* I wish' *eh! 'be unberstood ad the. Noble and Learned Lard utoesid g i ve his attend- 'speaking ofticinlly, but as an individual Peer Of`,Per ance more frequently in the House, you, my Lords, ' 'lament. ' I And here my Lords, I can only say, that must feel gratified by it, and the country would be . if , the Lord * Chancellor is to sit only three days in the obliged to himior it. But, stir 140, 1- ben been Court of Chancery, and be occupied the three . alter;; taunted with my habit of doubting, and 04 . by one nee days' in this .. ll(ouse in hearing appeals, it will.be amongst your Lordships. I am charged with start- impoiSible for any man so' circumstanced to dic ing hesitation, and with creating difficulties; and charge his duty to that Court: If nothing better can this at a periocrof life *hen fallibility may be suf- 'your proposed than the m easures recommen ded lay ' fered to operate so far, at lest, as to suggest the pr o- piety of reconsideration in tjuestions of moment aid luny fears 'as to the result. I Enos thete me persons There tight. must soon be an end to my natural life; 'who are of opinion tharehe Offices of Lord Chancel- ! and I care not haw joOnAtt eifl'it. tt P:..? to itqleselleialifor and Speaker of this House might be.divide.l ; :life;. for it will lie *great, .I hope a lasting cesnfoirt but I can 'safely say, at the close of a long official I for me to.know, that I hate, by my .cionlitiugs s beca,gle, that I never knew an individu a l o f p ro f ess i ona l 'the meansof p reserving to .. li the property that other- • isience, let him -belong, to what party he might, , v is e w ing4 ilingajli . h!tee been awarded to 11: 'My did not deprecate-the eeryidea of separating these Lords; fo s s the twenty Years, With only *short eackik! , , vitt offices, as tenclin c ,m, *bile combined, to keep i tion,•duriag which I have presided in the Cciurt Where . to e ther; iiientiv Of lAW. it has also been a slues.: I have - the botom. to sit. I have only to fleshy,- that non how far it might be convenient to sepal - ate the' you will please - to c omp ar e my con d uct with 1-,..t 9 1* cases of lunatics, and thejurissliction Of Anti) kr 0 pscies i l ' my predecessors in the same official trust ; fur I will . f rom t h e o ffi ce o f Lord Charicciltir. lam williii B to! 411 ow, that in ordinary bankruptcies tte Vice. lailor's Court has been a most useful iustitutio I,tkaigh not in matters of appeal; but I never c:in iopscnt to remove the custody of Ihrirrics from - 0 7 pibuiral where it is now placed. I hope, in muck', ing, that I have said nothing to offend the feelinr any Noble Lord, though rvuch has been said, i niwt believe uointeatiacally, to-uratutd.mpavt.u. sue is with your Lor:dships, and I. earnestly'. you will be gmide4 by tlyy; discretion and tlntt equity which are the best safeguards of the rights-44,15e-stib. ject,ancitto proudest monuments of your The -Earl OROSVENOR, in expl, that he never meant to offend the Noble and Learned Lord; but if, as . doubts had arisen from his conscieni could only say that he regarded it as tunate circumstance for the country. The Xprl of AI3ARDEEN, as a 1%, Cpmmittee from 'whom The Report I wished their Lordships to remark, tlt lion of all the 'etas lay in the appeals No person could admire more than hi 'rivalled learning, laborious exertions, ledged intFgrity alb, Noble and Lea. the Woolsack; but he could not agree die conclusions draWn by that. Noble Lord. Scotland had not yet come to frwrnity which was contemplated ac ti Union. - .It Was' then, however, the celebrated LOrd bacon, VIA the Scott in_thep_roceSt . of time, coMe under the . Englisb law. .Lord RLI,ENBORQUGH suggest( was not the intention of their.Laroshii this debate, they could not adjourn al than thv present (eiAht Arm. beard, lie confessed be wished - far.soMe .ider the subject. Lod LIVERPOOL, said, when should art ive, he would have no objt. journment, if there should be any Nobs not having delivered his opinion, w Lord MELVILLE thought it hig, whatever their Lordships might do dispose of the appeals now before tht I denied that it was a new modelling of Lion of that House to appoint anon Speaker of that House in place of the lor, and he wished Noble Lords who sertion to reflect, that his 11Lije,ty ci pleased, put the Great Seal in . commi approved of.the clause to compel attei Lordships; because he considered an bar to be the undoubted right of the land ; and although the articles of 1 mention that'right, he did not think a better prosf of that - being understood the Union than the constant pact' from the Courts below, which hk, existed. Some. Noble Lord's complaine• skin of Scotch appeals in this House ur that it was assimilating the Scotch law; but this he denied ; and he , Noble Lord were to decide, except .0 pies of Scottish law, he would be guit tion of duty. He was satisfied, that if continued in future to decide as they done, they would give satisfaction to' tish nation.. Lord HOLLAND objected to this cause it, first, imputed to the consti House a defect which did not exist; it cast upon their Lordships an imputi gence which they did not deserve. Aft' tation, he thought it a little too lard ' Lord on the Woolsack, after getting a inouire, i tn tax. give you a measure to constitutional objections; I don't sa' one, but can you give me a better?" The LORD CHANCELLOR.—Thi mistakes what I said: I did not say constitutional. objections. Lord HOLLAND.—Then I will leave stitutional," and' say " to'objectionse' ' and Learned Lord's meaning is this.•' . Committee of three,-and I now call upon ships to say whether you can propose - sure?" He would ask any Noble Lord say, iflisCpo; lading loaded the tab were canesl op, and on being charged spoilt all the diihes, were to reply," dishes are well cooked; but can you ter ?"--(Lawyhteo—Bat so said this Corn' dished up tiiis measure; they said, " have had the knife and the ladle, and you this dish; pow, if you who have not,. committee, .i0o)10 , ,e not handled the' ladle, don't like it.,'Cwiiati Mstke a betterl- Lora LIVERPOQL.,ant I am satisfied 9ff .tbat Lord HOLLADTD.—Then would 004 it nasty. To the observation that the name a Lord Keeper, he would reply to the man who said that the America X'tkit to complain, as there were many England who were only 'virtually represented, •shcw to America the shameful part Of • , and you tell her to look up to it: spy, you chew to the Scots the anomaly stitution of this House, and you tell ther they have to look. up ;o." His Lordshik. in , 6 of the appointthent *of a Lord ,Keeper him of that .ne . plus Ora of folly, Justice scribed by Shakspeare, and of whom " They, by observing of him, became and he, by conversing with them, became 'A1100 7 114 s.ery ing-man ;" and if that pe rs r in' this Muse, every NohIC Lord, who • appointment could say in another line .ef ti poes--" Write me down an os. " He laquit sent to the appointment.of a Speaker, nitlecii wrung from llirn by sheer necessity ;Am' if .11 k, should. rat 4r3i3ppiatpnc j aiiip among theki l nri. ships than to have one.appouttga OtrieWliefi: li e 91'7 jected to this measure becauscit wars ikonittentsriih their Lordships' dignity,Aecause it cast. - L 11 44T Lordships an imputation which they did not.snix4o and beciuse it std to !fie frqtAli - aution, for dish appelAanti higirce4fties of Justice, tun.ao . SOicb *Ppelatiti We attr - JOK-tilar article. TWP or . three No4le:Llindllin wing riacp:at euft, ThelEal , l of LOTERNOJ e suggested thoptone4:l/. °- 1 ,3n abii*l9 l oo,4 Aubate4ltl to -storm was ▪ the aseful institutior, ; but I never C4ll imarics from - the hope, in conclud. old the feelings cf heen said, I court ernestlj- I),Pe - 414 In and thit equity- rights-of-Orb-sub: your own honour." !Aplanation, —said; e feelings of 4hi IS it appeared, his scientiousness, he as a most unfor; r• Member of t' t? rt was presentech that the fotinda: ds froin Scotloot . ; himself the uts: ▪ and acknow Learned Lord rri'. gree in Many-of .ble and-Learned to that - legal nni. the period el-the e opinion of AI cotch -PAW :would, ; the yoke of esto„ that .as eips to contin At abetter hn error what he h tome time to con. a proper hot, bjcction to an a. Noble-Lord, wl uld wish togivei uglily necessary do ultimately, tir• the House. of the comfit nother person a !I ' he Lord Chancel ho made that a could, when I mission. He al.:. ttendance of thei in appeal to th to people of Sco Union did . I nk there could .- I :ood at the time ' actice of appeal had ever since ained of the cleci- upon the grou hto the English ' e thought if any .upon the printi. uilty of a derelic- if their Lordship hey had hitherto -3 to the whole Scot- •1 is Resolution ; be. istitution of that :; and, secondly, utrtion of negli- After this intim- trd for the Noble a Committee to ire which is liable say it is a good ; The Noble Baron y it .was liable to leave out as con. e* but the Noble ▪ have had s upon your Lord- ose a better mea- -d what he ultoq Able wide dArie ged w ith having sion'(l4:l4 a cook Them. lick I Committee wh , U we certainly id*.hitve gjven notbeen On the the knife and betters" - 4 satisfied p dine not, if I th4ogltt the Crown could ply 4; Aar ke dill . nericans hnei. nD ' many present in presented, "XCe9 Of our .094rit3th it:" so be wapiti , maly in the ctn. them that's•Wirar hip, when Speak. eeper, retßittded 'tic; Sliell#N,.4i;" Ins it rte silly.dossigu r i came a very f t ii# person were no* ; 10 Voted for' ohs in; :Of ,the yinir **gull nut .010-• r, in . : Wqo - . .butlf he situp nohjt thetir to*