Star. — London, England, 1821-05-22 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, MAY 21. LORD BRUDENELL U. WEBSTER. This was an action upon the warranty of a horse, tried at the last Assizes for the county of Leicester: the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff. Mr. CLARK a few days since obtained a Rule Nisi for a new trial, upon the ground that Lewin, a witness of Lord Bru denell's, had misdescribed himself at the trial. The circumstances appeared in the STAR of the 15th inst. Mr. DENMAN now, for the plaintiff, *requested that the case might be argued in the present Term: Lord Brudenell conceived that opinions unfavourable to his character might be produced by the statement which kad gone forth to the Public. Mr. Denman added, that Lewin, the groom, might at the trial have been mistaken for a farmer, but that he had never so de,cribed himself. Mr. MORGAN, for the defendant, said that his notes, were at variance with Mr. Denman's statements. The Cover ordered that notice should be given to Mr. CLARK, and the matter come on forthwith. THE KING D. BENBOW. This defendant pleaded not guilty to two indict silents for libel. The prosecutors are the persons who style themselves " The Constitutional Association." THE KING V. WILLIAM STEAR. This was a penal proceeding under the statute 4th Geo. 111. The defendant, a member of the Kings bridge Yeomanry, was convicted before one of the Magistrates for the county of Devon, of refusal, upon discharge from the service, to give in his accoutrements. Mr. TYRRELL applied for a certiorari, removing, the conviction into the Court of King's Bench. The defendant's affidavit, upon which the motion was grounded, went into much length, and into variety of circumstance. It appeared that the defendant, who was a trumpeter in the Kingsbridge Yeomanry, and who had laboured in that vocation for nine years --a a long lease to the clinking of pewter !"—at tended in February last a meeting of his corps. On presenting himself at the place of rendezvous, lie wa. informed that the meeting had been called princi pally on his account, and requested to quit the room ; he was recalled ; told—that trumpet, in the Kings bridge Yeomanry, he should blow no more ; and turned neck and shoulders out of the house. Never doubting that there was good cause for the attention' which had been paid him—though quite at a loss to what cause to attribute it-the defendant took his , way home, and was soon after visited, with a de.l mand of his accoutrements, by a private Yeoman, named John Thomas. Part of the warlike gear he forthwith surrendered; but some of the articles, par ticularly a saddle, upon which he had ridden for 14 years, were a trifle hors de combat, and they were to be delivered as soon as they had undergone needful repair. This delay, however, cf full surrender, what ever the excuse, was displeasing to the Authorities of the Kingsbridge Yeomanry, and in a few days, the articles which defendant had given to Thomas came back, accompanied by a summons from a Justice of Peace. After stating that, in consequence of such summons, defendant did appear before the Magistrate, the affidavit went on to describe the conversation that took place between the parties— Justice—A So, you are here, Sir. How could you be such a fool as to comer Defendant—" I came in obedience to your Wonldis order." Justice—" You must be a great fool. How could you let anybody persuade you to come?" Defendant—" I did not need to be persuade], Justice—" Hold your tongue, Sir; not a word from you. Do you know that you might be tried by a Court-Martial, and ded up to the halberts, eh ?—You might; and I should like to have the *Mingo( you !" It was scarcely necessary to add, Mr. TYRRELL said, that the defendant was convicted ; but, as the other side had been some time apprized of the pre sent motion, he trusted their Lordships would make the Rule absolute in the first instance. Mr. Wane said, that the Magistrates were, of course, quite ready to meet the case; but, unfortu nately, there had been an informality in the swearing of their affidavit : the error should be rectified, and cause shewn at a very early day.—Rule ma granted. THE KING D. JOHNSON. This is a matter rather of a novel description. In the year 1813, a man named Wm. Johnson was in dicted for some breach of the Revenue Laws, and convicted, at Salisbury. By the conviction becoming liable to a penalty and to certain costs, Wm. John son absconded; and, in February last, a man named Joseph Murray Johnson, who has, as it seems upon every view of this intricate transaction, a brother named William Johnson, was taken in execution for the debt. Joseph Murray Johnson now applies to be discharged, saying that the indictment at Salisbury was against his brother, Wm. Johnson ; the prosecu tion maintains that, although the name in the indict ment is Wm. Johnson, yet the man now in custody is the man really convicted, and who really did of fend. It appears to be generally admitted that there are two brothers, who strongly resemble each other, and it now becomes a question as to which is the real Simon Pure. Mr. GURNEY spewed cause against the discharge of. Joseph Murray Johnson. The affidavits on which his discharge was demanded were two—the one from himself, stating that he (deponent) was not the con victed party ; the other from his brother, stating that he (deponent) was. Joseph Murray Johnson's affida vit further stated, that he had been laid hold of five years since on the present claim, and released with an apology for the mistake: William Johnson's affi davit concluded by complaining that he was not in custody. In opposition to these documents, Mr. Gurney produced the affidavit of Mr. Clark, the at torney who conducted the proceedings at Salisbury, in 1813, swearing that the man now called Joseph Murray Johnson, came to him (Clark) in 1818 : call ing himself Charles Johnson, and offering—still, however, as he said, from his brother William John son—eighteenpence in the pound upon the debt now in question. The Learned Counsel relied less, how ever, upon the proof which he adduced than upon the proof which the applicant failed to adduce. There were two main questions—who had actually been served with process? and who had substantially de fended the cause at Salisbury ? Now, upon the first of those points the affidavits were equivocal; and as to the second—which might have been clearly proved by the Attorney employed to conduct the defence— there was no affidavit at all. Mr. Sc..tuizir submitted that the affidavit of W. 1.- Johnson' offering to surrender, . was the best proof of identity that.cotild be given. The LORD Cuter Jusrtcs doubted how far, after the discharge of Joseph Murray Johnson, that offer might be available. There was, his Lordship thought, a great deal of length and breadth swearing in the affidavits of the Johnsons ; and the absence of an affidavit from the Attorney who conducted the de fence at Salisbury was a very suspicious circumstance. Mr. CHITTY said, that the Attorney had quitted practice, and now resided at Tunbridge. The Loan CHIEF Jusrtca.—Tunbridge is not too far to send to. • It was eventually agreed that further affidavits should be produced. THE KING V. FRANCIS AND JAMES JOLLY. - This was an, indictment against the Proprietors of the Carlisle Journal, for an alleged libel upon the Marquis of Queensberry. The paragraph complained of appeared in the Paper of June 17, 1820, and• was couched in the following terms: It has generally been allowed, that of the three grand divi sions Into which our European dominions are divided, the Scotch are the most provident, and the most averse to applying for pa rochial relief. This results from an honest feeling of indepen dence, which would submit to many privations before it could humble itself to obtain that sustenance which its own labour did not provide for. The pressure of distress, therefore, must have been extreme, when, in spite of all these laudable prejudices both of education and habit, in many of the parishes in the county of Dumfries, the number of paupers have within these few years been considerably increased. One reason assigned for this la mentable change is the throwing into one large farm several small tenements which respectably maintained four or bye families in decent comfort; the inmates of which, being thrust out in order to make way.for the opulent holders, are obliged to become ser vants or cottiers to the latter. Thus a grade to pauperism formed, that continually slopes in geometrical descension, until that living grave of independence, a parish workhouse, closes upon them, and swallows up all self-respect and that pride and nobility of heart, which is the best assurance foe moral and political virtue. " --- The man of wealth and pride . " Takes up a space that many poor supplied. " Good Heavens ! what sorrows gloosn'd that parting day _ " That card them front their native walks away ! " When the poor exiles, ev'ry pleasure past, " I lung round the bowers, and fondly look'd their last!" , " This pathetic description by the patriotic Goldsmith parti cularly applies to what has just occurred in the parish of Cum mettrees, Dumfries-shire, by order of a certain Noble Marquis, who, determined to expel the small farmer from one of his estates, Which forms the greatest part of the parish, last week ejected five or six families from their domiciles, which be burned to the ground. The poor tenants neat day obtained shelter in Annan. _ . . " We make no comment upon this. We merely give it as an article of intelligence : the Noble Marquis or his Agents may possibly be enabled to justify this emir's of proceeding; but in the meanwhile we suspend our opinion.. It may be proper to add, that an aged tenant and his wife were so affected at the sudden change of their prospects, at being driven from the place to which their heart-strings were attached, that Nature gave way, and the hollow grave, more compassionate than man, received below what was ejected frdm above." The cause was tried before Mr. Justice BEST, at the late Carlisle Assizes; and the Jury found the de fendants Guilty. Mr. COURTENAY now prayed judgment. The defendants, in mitigation, put in their own affidavit. They denied having written the article themselves; ascribed it to a correspondent from whom they were in the habit of receiving intelligence, and offered to give up the author. They further stated, that the first notice which they received of the displeasure of the Marquis had been conveyed in the shape of indictment ; complained that their offers of reparation had been rejected, and concluded by an appeal, upon the score of their families, to the consi deration of the Court. • _ _ On the part of the prosecution, the Carlisle Journal of the 3d of March, 1821, was put in. It contained a rei,ort of the trial of the indictment, to which was subjoined the following remark :—" The Proprietors of our Paper have been tried and found guilty of a libel upon the Marquis of Queensberry. Which of the parties are most degraded by the proceedings we will not say. It has two other tribunals yet to come before—public opinion and the DEITY." Mr. ALDERSON rose in mitigation of punishment. Without intending for a moment to justify attacks upon private character, he did not think it necessary to waste one word upon the matter which had just been adduced in aggravation. Of private animosity towards the Marquis of Queensberry, the defendants were not accused ; of political animosity they could not even be suspected because the Noble Marquis had no political character whatever ; and, but for his rank, his influence, and his station, would have been, in fact, altogether unknown. Very few observations as to the nature of libel would, be sufficient. It im puted to the Noble Marquis no individual act.of vio lence or of inhumanity : it came from a source in which the defendants were accustomed to place con fidence. The defendants had imagined—probably they were mistaken—but they had imagined that to sweep away a whole mass of poor but independent people, and to place them as servants under the dominion of a master, was of course prejudicial to the interests of society. They had thought that small tenantry formed part of an advantageous system ; but they had forborne from• comment : they had stated a fact, and waited (to use their own words) to see whether the Noble Marquis or his agents would justify what had been done. When he said "stated a fact," he (Mr. Alderson) believed it was agreed that there was some foundation for part of the para graph complained of—some small tenants had been ejected from the estate. Mr. Justice BAYLEV.—You are aware, Mr. Alder son, that the libel is charged to be false. Mr. ALDERSON observed that there was a difference between charging-it to be false, and charging it to be entirely void of foundation. . Mr. COURTENAY, in aggravation, dwelt upon pub lic peace and private character. Mr. Justice BAILEY, after commenting upon the nature and effect of private libels in general, sen tenced the defendants to three months' imprisonment in the custody of the Marshal of the Marshalsea ; and to find sureties for their good behaviour during three years, themselves in £2OO, and two sufficient persons in £lOO each. At one o'clock the Jaonp Cams JUSTICE went to Guildhall, to sit at Nisi Prim. ARCHES COURT, MAY 19. JONES, FALSELY CALLED NASH, 9. NASH. This was one of those causes which are so frequent under the present constitution of the Marriage Act. —lt was a suit of nullity of marriage, by reason of minority, and brought by Abigail Caltr y Jones, falsely called Nash, against William Nash, her pretended husband. The libel set forth that the lady was born on the 12th of February, 1800, and married to Mr.' Nash, by virtue of a.license, at a church in Worces ter ; the affidavit previously sworn to by him, for that purpose, stating that at the time of sweating to it. Miss Jones was 44 aged 21 years and upwards," whereas they were married on the 9th cf March, 1820. The identity of the parties, and the age and baptism of the Lady, were fully dep"sed to ; and the Court, without hesitation, admitted the libel. . CHETTLE V. CIIETTLE. This was a case of separation or divorce, by reason] of adultery, instituted by Mr. Thomas Chettle, of Grantham, in the County of Lincoln, against Mrs. Mary Chettle, his wife. From the whole of the evi dence, it appeared that these parties were married on the 11th of May, 180 ; that they lived at Notting ham for some time, and afterwards at Grantham, until the month of August, 1819, when Mrs. Chettle, who was alleged for some time previously to have treated her husband with great inattention and indif ference, insisted upon a separation, to which Mr. Chettle, by the advice of his friends, was induced to consent, making her an allowance of £BO a-year for her separate maintenance. Some time in the year 1819 .Mr. Chettle detected an adulterous intercour se between his wife and a Mr. Wm. Marshall, who lived also at Grantham. Dr. SWABEY and Dr. I.vsntricroN admitted the fact of adultery ; but contended, on behalf of the j wife, that Mr. Chettle was not entitled to the remedy for which he prayed, he having himself to blame for any misconduct on the part of Mrs. Chettle, in con sequence of his own behaviour. to her, which had driven her from the path of her duty. He had used her personally, and he had wronged her mole sensibly by deportment towards his female servants which amounted to actual " solicitation of chastity." —lt was upon this last plea that, in the case of " Forster and Forster," the husband had been de-, prived of relief, in a suit also of divorce, by reason of adultery, which he brought against his wife.— The Court, they hoped, would see no reason to refuse dismissing Mrs. Chettle from all further observance of this suit. Sir Joux NICHOLL said, that though there could be no doubt that what had taken place between Mr. Chettle and his female servants was highly improper and unbecoming in him as a married man and the master of a family, yet it could not be contended that any. actual connexion of an unlawful description was at all proved to have existed between them. The evidence bore no construction of the kind. As to the recrimination which it was attempted to plead in the allegation of the wife, it was clear that acts of cruelty were spoken to as having been done by Mr. Chettle ; but no fact of infidelity was made out against him. —The Learned Judge recited the whole of_the facts alleged in the evidence; and after expressing his opi nion that the defence set tip on the part of Mrs. Chettle was untenable, on the plea either of condo nation or of recrimination, he pronounced for the prayer of the husband. Bow-frarrr.—Tux HERNE BAY SMUCCLERI.-..Tn ronsequenct of fresh information received at this Office respecting the person: concerned in the fatal affair at Herne Bay, Salmon, one of the principal officers, was dispatched to Canterbury on Thursday last, and on Sunday he returned to town with Ivo) men in his custody. Their names are Thomas IVe6tler and J.,11t. Styles; and yesterday they underwent an 0. lamination before lt u uA an Bea. sat, Esqq. The only witness against them on this occasion was George Griffiths, a man whom we have before described as deeply implicated In the transactions of that unfortunate night, but whose information subsequently led to the apprehension of his companions. This man now swore positively to the identity of the prisoner IVebster, as being the owner of one of the carts engaged in landing the tubs of spirits from the boat on the night to question and as being actively employed with the others at the time Lieutenant Snow lost his life. The ether prisoner, Styles, was apprehended on suspicion of having been present at the affray, armed with a musket ; but Griffiths declared he Mew nothing of him. Both prisoners denied all participation in the affair; and they were committed for further examina tion on a future day. The above-mentioned George Griffiths, principal witness against the Herne Bay smugglers, was himself placed in durance last week, and underwent several examinations se a charge of feloniously uttering forged Bank of England notes. It appeared in evidence, at his first examination, that bye forged efis notes had actually b een paid away by him to a person at Can terbury ; and in his defence he stated, that he did not know a good note from a bad one, not being able either to read or write, and that he had taken them in the way of business, but he knew sot from whom; and, in proof of his honesty, he declared, that he had caused his name to be written upon every one of the notes in question by a young woman of his acquaintance. At his se cond examination, en Saturday last, he WAS discharged from this accusation ; the Solicitor of the Bank stating, that inquiry had been made into the circumstances, and the Bank did not thick it a fit case for prosecution. Before he was removed f:-om the Bar, however, the Magistrate (G. It. 31iNsiteu., Esq.) ad monished him seriously on the irregularity of his past life, and expressed a hope, that the narrow escape he had just had, would produce better habits in future. He was also informed, that if at any future time he should be detected uttering forged notes, the evidence given In the present case would infallibly be brought against him. ATTEMPTED ROBBERY OF THE GLASGOW MAIL.— A scheme for the robbery of the Glasgow Mail—in one way it may be said to have been an actual rob bery, was attempted on Monday se'nnight, which, for ingenuity of contrivance, .may.hold a place amongst the most notable exploits of a similar kind. In the course of the previous evening, the full number of in side tickets (which for the Mail is limited to four), was taken out in different names. Up to the hour of departure next morning (eight o'clock), only one pas-. senger appeared, and as there is no delay allowed, the coach of course set off from Edinburgh. A second passenger, however, appeared, as the coach passed St. Andrew's -street, who, upon being taken up, seemed to recognize the other. This one had in his hand a sort of travelling-bag, which the Guard, to prevent incumbrance, offered to secure be s ide himself. This he declined, observing that it would not incommode him, and he would take charge of it himself. On the arrival of the coach at Mid-Calder, one of the two alighted with the Guard, and went in with him to the Post-Office, inquiring if there were any letters for Mr. Williams? He was answered in the affirmative, and a pretty large letter, sealed with black wax, was produced with that address, which he immediately opened, besides a smaller letter, the postage of which he paid. At this juncture the individual who had been left in the coach appeared in sight, when Mr. Wil liams, with an air of sorrow, called out to him—" See, read that—it is what I was somewhat prepared for— we must return to Edinburgh immediately." They then gave orders for a post-chaise, and the Mail coach of course proceeded to Glasgow. On its ar rival there, it was discovered that the money-box be longing to the flank of Scotland, which is deposited below one of the seats, secured with a lock, had been abstracted, and agood deal of alarm was consequently created. It luckily turned out, however, on cornmu, nicating with the Bank .at Ed.inb rgh, that the la , sent to Glasgow that day was entirely empty, a ch. cumstance which very seldom haprons. The b ot the Royal Bank occupies the sameflace in the eel lout on this occasion it was full of spec'e, and of siderable weight, which no doubt prevented flees chusing it. One of the individuals had a large Era* shade over his eyes, probably for the purpose ot . tua ,. cealment, arid the other was of a very polite a.lchvart with an English accent. They must have got act to the boxes by means of false keys, as the fit z t found the seats locked down when he left der. The boxes belonging to the Bank, it may In observed, are regularly forwarded every day, O w ther empty or not. A PaitTINENT ANSWEit.—Some time ago, -a boy went into a shop in Glasgow, belonging t o oar of the Magistrates, who was induced. from the b or being of rather an interesting appearance, to put some questions to him regarding the state of his education and moral instruction, and found him very ignorant. as might have been expected. At length the wo r my Magistrate asked him how he employed the Suisd a i? and was informed that be 6eggit on the rtery dagi and played /,imset tke Sabbath do r. " What.," says the ilaiiie, 4. is that the way you spend the Sa'bh at a day ! Do you know, my boy, where all those go tins play themselves on Sunday ?" " Aye, Sir," yays thi boy, " they gang to the laigh Green r FRIGHTENING CIIILDrtEN.—Asa little child, abort two years old, was lately playing at doe door of its parents, in Preston, one . of its sisters walked sharpy up to it, without being perceived, and lifted it upt ir the a •Ils behind ; at the same ti ne making a wilc o if to al um it; when it was immediately thrown into a fit, and the poor creature endured the most distress. ing agonies for a few hours, when a period was put to its sufferings by death. ACCIDENTS.—Sunday se'nnight, two boys, of ply.. mouth, while sailing in a boat in the Sound, were up. set by a squall ; one of the boys, who was a good swimmlr, sacrificed his life to preserve that of hi s brother, who could not swim, by sustaining him until his own strength failed, and be sunk to rise no mum the object of his fraternal solicitude as saved by a boats crew who went to their assiitance. A boat, in which were six persons, four of who m were females, ssas su:ilc on Sunday evening below Isleworth, by the unskilful act of two youts, w h o ran her against some One of the females, cf the name of Spencer, was•unfortunately drowned, but the others were s. , :ved by a Westminster party is a six-oared boat. The d"ceased was a servant, who had liberty for the day, and resided at 13rentford. ROBBEItY- 2 Ye:>zerday morning, between three and four o'clock, the dwelling- i.ouse of Colonel Eutt of the City-Road, was entered by means of false keys, and plundered of plate, linen, B.c. to the value of f. 50, with which the thieves got clear off. BIRTHS. Sunday, at her house in Spring-gardens, Lady Elizabeth' Smyth, of a daughter. Sunday se'nniglit, at the !loyal Barrack‘, Dublin, the Lady d Lieut.-Colonel Lindsay, 78th liighlaJders, of a daughter. Alay 5, it Dublin, the Lady of the 1:ou. Ctptain King, ILL of a son. Dec. G, at Bangalore, the Lady of Lieutenant-Colonel EL Carey Fleming, of a sou. Tuesday, at Alversteke, the Lady of Captain Harrison, Royal Marine Artillery, of a son.-11orday, at the above plate, tie Lady of Lieut. J. Fraser, same corps, of a daughter. MARRIED. Tuesday, at Clifton Church, Captain Long, lav tithe Rapt Horse Guards (Blue), to A/ary, eldest daughter of Fdsc.-4 Daniel, Esq. Clitton, Barrister at Law. Immediately arter the ceremony, the happy pair set off for Weymouth to pass the hr ey-nnam. Saturday, at Prlttlewell, Essex, William Heygate, ikit. and Alderman, to Isabella, fourth daughter of the late lidosid Longdun Macmurdo, Eq. of Clapton, Middlesex. Same day, Thomas Pares, jun. Esq. M. P. of Leicester, to Oc tavia, firth daughter of the late Edw. Longdun Mactunrdo, E.g. May 1.5, at Edinburgh, R. 41. Chermside, Esq. M.D. loth Royal Hussars, to Jane M. Williams, only daughter of the law Robert Williams, Esq. of Cerise Lodge, Dorset,h re Monday se'nnigbt, at Southampton, Lieut. Ptceper Amine, R.N. to Miss Mitzbell, both of l'ortsea. Sainrday, at Richmond, John Parkinson. Esq. bit 'ajestia Consul at Pernambuco, to Penelope Page, of Ivy Howe, mond, third daughter of William Page, Flq. of Southamptro. At Henrietta, (N. Y.) Captain Samuel Currier,tn Miss Mar Archer. This is the seventh wife of Capt. Currier ; lu, riarli was buried but three weeks before he espoused the seventh. May 7, at Harmstrm, near Lincoln, Thomas Barker, aged 74 to Mary Lawrence, aged 78, being the fourth time the.lrride ha honoured the altar of Hymen. The united ages of bride, brads. groom, and two bridernaids, was 240 years. A large concourre of spectators witnessed the ceremony, and tie venerable palrs► turned to their dwelling amidst loud acclamations, accompaniel liy several of their friends, who were all made heartily welcome. —To increase the vivacity of the party, the Lord of the Manse kindly gave a barrel of good old October, out of his own cello. DIED. May 4, at Leven, in Fife, Mr. John Mackay, Surgeon, Ft. ilerick-street, Edinburgh, of a short illness. _ _ May 14, at Bath, aged 50, Mrs. Remmington, relict of C. John Remmington, late of the Madras Army. 1/..c. 24, at Nagpore, in India, of the cholera morlaue, Cape& Charlesworth, Ist Native Infantry. Lately, at Alton, Mn. Sophia Clementine Docker, daogbler of the late Rey. Launcelot Docker. Rector of Keevil, Wilts May 12, John Love, fisher in Newton - Ayr, at the age it nearly 100 years. May 5, at Hucknall Torkard, Notts, John Spray, and on tie following morning, Mercy his wife, the former aged 71. de latter 61) years. From their great attachment to each odic they were called the " two doves." They were never know te quarrej, nor ever went out on business without accompanyits each other. They were buried in the same grave; after al a' ing in their lives an example of conjugal attachment, hide midst of poverty, perhaps never equalled. - -- - —...-- NENVGATE •xo LEA DENIM LL MAIM ETS, Ma S. (By the Carcase.) Beef 3s Od to 4s 01 So Veal .........34 Od to 4 . 111 Mutton 3s 041 to 4s Od Port 3s 4d to a Lamb 4s. 8 . to 6s. Od. PRICF.S or HAY oars STRAW YESTERDAY. ST. J A Stalk wtIII . I4WARI. Hay 31 los Od to 41 lOs Od Hay... 51 Itis to 41 Straw 11 7s Od to 11 164 Od Straw 11 es to 111 6 "'", Clover 41 Os ed to 51 Os Od Clover 41 04 so 31 Co w Ships at Market. 66 Newcastle $ SemlerLand COAL MARL Ships S KET, Max 41. ;014. • Price ;2ll Ses 6d to do. :As OJ to •14h MAILS MIS Mar...ARE. tielt. MIL gg ill Dublin 3 0 Lisbon • • Waterford • 2 0 France 1 Guernsey and Jersey 1 0 Ilamburgb 1 I Holland 0 0 Gotteubmi 3 Flanders 0 0 Leeward NW& 0 O ° Malta 0 0 New Tack lIIGH•WATEItat LONDON 11121DGR T 0.711081111 Meeting • - is rtliett.tv Ito At te moon - 4$ LONDON ; Printeciiid !milliard by Lyn Km, PIM* Ilasv, Templr-Hu• , .