Star. — London, England, 1810-05-19 00:00:00

• • c frainsel to drittie analfigiet train the Wee b ought and sold and sitortit itterwards a Bill thr„,ght it _extra molt them: But when the Com: was brought intd the House fbr the purpose of put . s of • to soin Crti 2 l • f tO repor t , that every Court in ling an t rid to that practice. Of late, many petitions - - went sO .tr • • Ses- had been - the house for Parliatnentary ithat AV. -.Gitedihe dint Monier , for sOPpo‘ition of his inakink persedarattack on any NA &AA .Qt tilatifotiWiriatitnt _ ; bnt the Noble ter aensibility on that might, perhaps, have feet thatt other Members. dom—which surrendffed it to monstrous att.unders iced leave it. and confiscations, and which have orrat to leave after a connection of 500 yeati . *ith England. a►e . . . vetteMagistrates at Quartet . presented to the . cruse se. _._ ,nty subc k i n .d o m, and the tie , i r ul the same power that the House claimedof reform. In many of-. them there were expressions Via t Han• Friend:(Mr. War d ) had charged him with signal illustration of your m is-gov ernmeni. Char silo . ha d f o r con:tempts, he wished that the. Coin- which the House appeared to catch at, in order to get being actuated Its bringing forward this motion by a not then the character of my country with those evils O rm 'el have shewn on what precedents they rid of theta; but in all of them there had' been, and wish to catch popularity •he thought, however, he which are the natural e ff ect of yqur own conduct, nor riitN? attlt:i ,vinion. H e I vished also that they had as long as those entries remained on the Journale, mightlairly retort on his lion. Friend, that he seemed callehet the matchless de . pravltr of the people which footle,. t :, E • 1 the preceden ts a g ainst it, as well as those for . he supposed there would be allusions to the particular ; more desi rous t o court popularity within the House springs from the oppressie n of your own system. —a ref ° ' ;, an toe Ca " • • s e of Bushell, which had been mention- transaction which was the subject of his motion last than he could be to obtain it from rhos : without. He (Herr, - hear.) This he would have spoken before the , J ur y were committed for contempt , in • ye a r. Now as long as this entry remained on the thought e he Resolutions entered on the Journals were. Union, and thouel he no longer addressed a native i to entire co . ver dict contrary to the charge of the Judge. Journals of the House, he could not see how they a blot, which, as long as it was suffered to continue, Parliament , he still hi answer to thole who advanced, Ong. a t ,. ,t t j a . a t .0 t d ge (j e fferies), had not had the ho- ' could object to its befog inserted in a petition. He must preclude the House from all right to find fault in bate of Catholic claims, the fundamental laws of e to put open the warrant of their committal the t h ere fo re t h oug ht it wou ld be for the real dignity of with the language of the Petitions which was solely eie land, would ask what were these very l a irs t— e:l , 1 • 1 they were committed, the committal the House, and that it would remove a principal grounded on the resolutions. He nutit declare he had Werethey nottheDeclaretion of Right, that ordinance cose .01' A' lic 1 . el not hive been questioned in another Court. If he . groun d o f offence e if the House were to expunge this no intention of trying the Noble Lord twice, and of wisdom and liberty, the very model of inteili Reit eet some t•luits in. the Report of the Committee, it entry from their Journals. He certainly thought tin. ; owned he was surprized, th at when only two persons freedom? Were they net the Act of Settlement. Which fot:e'. l .. l , eexi ; ecte d o f him to justify himself for not • House of Commons now should have the same feel- ; had spoken on the occasion, he should be accused of though it liteited the Crown to a Protestant Family a gn, . . • be a Member of it. In the first place, • lag as their ancestors, and express it in the sitnle lan. Iso odious a conduct. chseidg ' *• did not countenance an eternal principle of exclusion I 1., ',die& that the House, and all the Members of i gunge ; b u t if the e modern practice was different, he i Mr. WARD and Lord CASTLEREAGH seVe- from civil rights aTaiiist Oatholic vitiates ?—The ..... .... eel:mime, were in possession of all the material : thought that two contradictory resolutions should not 1 rally expl a ined i n a very division. wr e s.an d t he motion , eloquent Member then proceeded to, state the pro -- ir AS heal Mg 1 . ; u pon I.lt. sub j ect, and therefore he 'be allowed to stand on the Journals of the House.— I was agteed to with a I gressive measures of that Jay, to prove the means by' s eceel 1 which Catholic disqualificetion was brought :about. -.seal not be able to add to the information they had i He must say, that in their practice the House hatiacted i CA TUOLIC ut:EsTION. ~, no sit l ijo :t ; ;In n, secondly, his opinion being de.- ! differently on other occasions. When Mr. Alexander ! Mr. GRATTAN rose for the purpose of s subMit- —Time lU r .—lit ll.m. Gentleman animadverted upon ~, e .11:: ~i , p „ , te to that deliberately declared by many ' Davidson was found tameering .for a seat, he was • tiog to the House his promised motion tor referring we objections to Catholic Emineipation, which were , f., i nr , h e c , ,uld not Witter himself, even if prosecuted by the House and fined, and no man said 1 the petition of the Catholics of Ireland to the conside- in his judgment so tmfairly and se unwisely drawn s ee SiLibi. -1. ‘ .. vete a t all !iStened to, that lie would be able in i a word in his defence. When I ady it was conceived ! nuien of a Committee of that House. It was his ob- from the Coronation Oath. It was impossible that . leere „, to c henee the opinion of any person on : that there had been an improper interference on the I jea not to disturb them by any new or disputed point oath could, or ought to emetic* such objections.* 2.;..);ebesiei:are. Under those circumstances, he did p ar t of a person coneeeted with the former Adminis- lof public controversy. Hie motion went at once to What, was it to be supposed that the Sovereign of the r . ;,; cou ld !lave done any good by being of : tration, respecting the diction for Hampshire, the I combine the entirety of the. empire with the enfran- country could be sworn against the privileges of the " •••, , C 1 111 ;,t . t.! ;on tile contrary, his d e nvering his! Gentlemen who now sat on toe Treasury Bench, but i chisement of that part to which he had the proud ho- people, and th at Goo shoidd be called to witness the taat .0 , e in e could have produced no other effect ; who were then in oppesition, thought it prop .!r ..0 de- 1 nour to begone. He had to place his confidence in unnatural 6141-Ann ?Is it necessary, said he, that I ope en • - e dd e yine the Report. ; ! fend most Warmly Whet they conceived the vielated I supporting their cause, as much upon thealdvantage should shew that the King clime; upon this subject ex : ( 1! ' ; , ! sot ,ke T 0 It-GENERAL regretted drat i ais . privileges of that House. Tltty, however, saw the : which the empire at loge must receive front their ad• he just without perjure ? How mischievous the idea— /Ty,. ; ,,,1 I, eer ned Friend had not attended told en- transaction of 1..0rd Castlereagh and Mr , l'erceval ht ; omission to civil imrminities, as well as finni the general how false the interpretation ? In fact , it it were to .. t h, : c,ommittc , : by his opinions. The hest ; a different light. Latele, when the ceedect of feed : ieeling :ie nenerally chinned in defence of that cause have any. weight, the inference would be, that the ~,„‘. „ f „ .,:r;'. i::•; a t truth was by the cellisiott of ;Chatham was under consideration, all the lotion; tern i through every part nt the coentry. It was true that King is sworn not only against mercy and justice, hut e i to s . nt in ciits. He conceived that it would have acquitted his Lordship of any bad intentina, and 1(t 'many in .11 very seriondy considered the state :If that agemst the Legislature. For he is pledged against 01 1 :' - ` - bea much better to attend the Committee than to t h ey passe d a el iminatory vote. They condemin d : eonnectiee which o: ne e d betw e en the Cetholie Church the alteration of the law, and of a law too eneetel F ..„ te e by Lima the Report was delivered, and then 1 Lcral Chatham, although they &aired that lie bed I el Ireland end the Spiritual Head :It R;nne. In the pre- subsequent to the constnictinn of the Cot :nation Oath ta ittac w k iz. He as astonished to hear his Hon. and no bad intention ; and they acquitted Lord Cee'r- , ent situa ion ef public events, it Was the opinion of —for my proposition applies to laws originating in .ee mice Fend say, Mat the r:ght of .the HoUn to reaßla and Mr. Perceval, merely became Oh! bad i.- , %a sy ereat :ICs that vine: riertalatiee s.hould beadopted; the reien of Queen Ann. But the idea is dinned, that e aninn was not ere: e l the topics r eferred to the con- ' tension Nias not cerried into exectition. At..... 4. SOl' e. ri anv of he: c oentryneee s ine:red as to the Vsee A ereet the King of a Protestant free people tit . c sian l eleee e eti of the. Committee. Censidering the eeten-! observations tieon the iileensistency el this contie .a, i na. , ]-)ritv ef thc:2.lthi 'lie lean/ leel pretested agaiitst the pledge.] against the fair cl&rus of a mr. e ,„ ;a i m : nat ion and high character ef his Hen. and: and tie. diserece of lets hag resohltions c.m:rade s.! yi tin endi.r et . stolt it powaT to the Crown, ant thotteh tion of las subjects. It is neither honoarable to e eees e e r ised, he could not but lament that he, of I to et ch teller standing on the Jeunials, lie ineecit t; :t I I;e must , ver respect their oppesition, it caul(' never be your cheracter, nor agreeable to yotir interest, to ad. i „lee pl . , f,, , seion, should stend up alone to nenY that ; the last en:ly should be expunged from the j; dried-. a'. the sacrifice of their commoe coentry. But such mit time supprAition. But it is said that tile object I ~:,ic h w . :s w wifil established by reason, by preee- I Lord CASTLERLAGH said, that however tie; et oppesitien, as to a particular consevence, could look for is not sought for by the Catholics—that they ten , and angelw ,ey. The light of the House as sup-1 Noble Lord who made the motion, might suppo e; be no bur to the motion which he had the honour to ,do not desire to be edm;tted into Parliament, or to rere A by i te intei r• veal precedents, 'by the analogy of i that this was not re-agitating the Tendon on his coil- 1 propose. - Manv who might diffsr as to the arrange- participate of. political power ; and this is assettcd„ 2 ;0r,.( o f Co er ts of Justice, and by then nvaried duct, and bringing him to a second m trial for the same t ent, rydglit whit perfect fairness vote for the refer- not only in eppesitien te their own repeated applice. t 1 4.:, .. ton (a the •wettest. men of the age. Against this imputed offence, he could net btu diller with him in t nn;* of :Ile Ciadeel'e Petition to .1 (le:nod:tee. In tions, but to all the arguments of probability—to ths ...i pe sinet ien he had heitrd no shitdow ot all sign- opinion. Ile Noble: Lord, by endeevouring to inn I s enile :le ) nett e:omnlittee, if such should. be the obvious suggestions of hum in nature. You supp•4l en: , A n H„n. Gentlemala had objected to the re- peach the judgment of the House in the case :o.!itn d ! ;sleosairs of to House, he felt that it was its duty io nn establishment of Si) milliens per annum, because treesin the 'epos( to the oeirtnies of individuals, to, and by attempting to have the resolutions the m a ' sensider the questien in all it: branches ; to consider you v date the Constitution which that establishment ereettine diet on a former diseussiou he had himself a d o p te d expunged f ro m the Journals, did by insinua-1 es well what was the right cif the Irish people, ar.d guarantees; and is it yon ;done can value that ee...a t Cone „;he caprtion (4 inIiVKItInIS ill support 0 d 1 his on inflict On flint a more pailiftil feeling than if the I, the check which the Crown for 'ls own security ought stitution !—that the Cali:ilk is indifferent about it ?.. „ (rt L ).is . I ! c! s oivended, thiat athhough the *nide- ! motion had directly attackea .11im. The :ligaments; m exercise upon the neminetion ef the Cathuhe tan; thet the Protestant alone can set a great estimate tarot of ', ne t , S''eef Justice Wilmot had not been ac- ;of the Noble Lord went to inflict on hint an indirect I Bishops. Upon the hater part of that sithjecs it was upon it ? Do you mean, that the effect of your penal l'i Me deli% ,e- •'. it wee as leeltimate an opinion es the I censure, which was m os t serious in its consequences; I iv. from his intention to decoive the pe .ple. Strange laws het been to Jest: ay the moral energy or the o re e . e o pi e i es .e . Lord Hales and Lord Coke. It and though k :eight be said it was not intended to appearances had presented theme:tees in V. treee, Cethelie ?—that is to say, that his spirits are broken let been et see to the \mild by his son, and its au- put Itini again upon Iris trial, and he was appal ently particularly affecting both parts of the British Fon- —ei.it he lees no dee! oto be free—and yet, that t o o e c e e eon e neurstionable. He trusted his Hon. : not celled upon to defend himself, yet the moue n p;re, and its peeple were reciprocally bound each to lie s'.l ill be ready um secrhice his life for your tit. „.,e e,.. eeo e ni ell e would also stand alyne in his opi- ; put him in it state of •the greatest ernhat low - rent, .4 icrifiee s ometliiine of prejudice to the common ad- fence. But you ale mistakee. The Catholic be. n , n , tl , : , t i t w a s com,petent to any Court of Justice to; from which he could only rely on the justice 01. the vantage of all. (Bear, Lac.) These were sugges- lies the sunpesition—the laws, pernicious as they are csntn e or c e lect use decision of the House of Cotn -1 House to extricate him. Ile should be sorry to tree- tors more particularly calculated for the considers- sad have i)ecn, have not had such eernicious influence nee , A s to liushell ' s case, it was by no means an I pass on the time ot the House, but he hoped they tion of the Committee which he should pro;ese, and upon him. In spite of the liw the Catholics have adlosy. It NV:IS lla c ontempt ; murder might as well , would allow so much to the natural state of his feel- could not interfere with the mein plinc i ple , upon become pro s pe rcus. The y are p ossessed of property. hoe been calied co ntempt. If a Court of Justice I infix on a subject that was to him so interesting. -ethic!) tite claims oi the Catholic body rested. Con. Their common:dal interest is considerable. If eon en etteily com mitted • for contempt, would his Hon. I Lord FOLKSTONF said, the n oti am - , is s broughi deter those upon that principle, or upon their expedi- quire, therefore, you will find that they feel their pri est Loomed Friend say than any other Court had a 1 forward by his Noble Vrielld, did teat, directly or in- ency, and that II ruse most feel then in a political vetions ; that they feel their exclusion from niche. ti; +t to correct their poiceedings ?So tvith the House i di rec tly, i m pe a ch the conduct tf the Noble Lord view, England :tad Iteland could have but one msnt, an from the Bank ; that they are fully semi a n ernmoile It was not competent to any Court to i who had just sat down. What had been the cour:e creed, namely—eternal separation front Frenchmen ble of Inda e exclusions they are condemned to suffer , ceaea c cas e e•.• decisions. It this were once ad- [ taken by his Noble Friend ? Petitions had been pre end French objects. ( Hear, hear.) The Canstite- .and that the commenalty have a sympathy wias them. in t e d i t eased he wholly destructive of the privileges 1 sented to the House, ell of which mentioned in ter ms Lion of England was the conjoint property of all its Luquire and you will find that they understand, and and irefereeence of the House. a of indignation the conduct el the Noble Lord. A re. people, and unless it was possible to prove that tile can feel all the insult and injury to which, from that Sir s?0,1;•;:r, ROMILLY, in explanation, said, `solution of the House had been read, which said that enjoyment of the Catholic, or, in other words, that s:oettion,• they are toe liable. Down to the very . that he had ee etid any thing about the Report, until I any attempt in a Minister to in fl uence the House, the civil fteedom of a great portien of its population, lowest of the Catholic peasantry this feeling preeails. /I! !Ind_'ZOOd that it was to lie recommitted. t should be. resented by the House. The decision of sets incompatible with the general happiness,,by eTe Cetle)lie peasant is a man, :end must be piled it, to tee les t le t he Hon. an'd going Learned Gentleman's ; the Attire, however, in the case of the Noble Lerd, a libel ttnon the Constiouioa to argue in favour of the distinction tied exists between him and his Pro. spc.!,,lic wo u ld only observe, that if he intended such I was aecerding to the argurnent of Ministers—di:lt he ex c lusion of that Body.—But, if such expedi- ' testant countrymen. That distinction is not only of. al a tt ac k u po n him, he thought it AVOIII.I have been I thotigh the attempt had been made it wits not carried ents could have ever existed, sub=sequent events prey- - fensive to him, but injurious to you. Do it Away ma re candid in him to have delayed it, until, by the I into effect. All these proceedings the petitions had e.I rhat the difficulty and the danger were delusive.— ; then. Incorporate t!:e Catholic and the Protestant. ern: , of thcH el se, he could be allowed to replyto him. I thrown into the teeth of the house, and the argument NV..te such inteediments religions or were they poli- . Make them the same, and you augment the power of M r . PeriesONP,`: said, that he Intel stated in his !of his Kahle Friend for bringing forward his motion ;;.c t a! ? If they were religious, the answer in favour of your population. The Cetholic, whom your arc , unient t h e c ircumstance of this opinion of Lord i was, thin he wished to do all in his power to remeee ;I e . Catholics was beyond contradiction given by the • I.tws could not bear down, will ;feel that *trail nUnts t u s t i e e Wilmot, He thought, however, that ! tYs unfavourable impression from the public mind., Universities of Pointy, Salamanca, Paris, and Vales- mind which the spirit of your Constitution a; . :elieh it was fair for him in his speech to use the i lam th,iag this, lie did not mean agent to open . the noise. If they were political, what did the history of leted to produce ; and that feeling, mast add einiees of such MCA in support of his argument, yet I question against the Noble Lord, but to take away d i e c omee y prove in the fullest confirmation ? What strength. Is it for you, a free people, to . nat. the Conimittee ought to have reported from fliers, las fir as he could, tie cause of complaint . mad lid your act of Union remise ? It promised the Ca- thr.t any pan of your fellow-subjeCtseen be indi and not from opinions. If there wit; any thing in his ! hew the Noble Lord could conceive it bore against i l i olic pei.iple restoratioe to civil riehts, bec:atise they about freedom ;or that aerpeople possessing ssocc;i which he wished. to retract, it WOS those pa: is ; him, he could not imagine. He should theref ore sup -1 n e erned them e xpedient —it pledged the character of , can he willing to destr :y it ?-• • You, the 'deli nt;eet seem as if he supposed that the peivi- I por: the moticen I both islands, to eft ace from the records the existence sioners for protecting this empire against a i . . 1: es of Patliament were to be defended by analogies i The Hon. Mr. WARD said, his Noble Friend ; o f religious discor.i, and to mkt. by common indis- tied dangerousenemy, what is the meg effectual leen other !.`..ourts. I near him had disclaimed 'env inter- ien of reviving I p e nsilde tics every class of its people, because in their for your defence ? If you are invaded, sib Sr THOMAS `11; RTON said, that he (rein- I the qttenioa against the Noble Lord opposite ; :mei loyalty they placed confidense, and to their co-epera- you oppose to the invaders ? Freedom i Whil preset of the proceedings of the House upon this bu- ; vet nothing could be more clear than that, if the i non you looked far safety. (Hear, hear.) To deny tit to meet Bonaparte ? withFr, Br aeon faorn le:ginning to end. He thetight it; was con- House agreed to. the merlon, it could . only be on Ito s uch a portion of thenin subjects their legiti- told, that if you comply the desire of teary to the dignity of thin House th:tt their peaker i the eround that the forenee prnceedings were wrong. maw rights, was indsible. Wltere no impediment tholic—if you grant him freedom, he would tillould aaswer di a process of law for an act done as ; and that the Noble Lord, though acquitted by the from religious ()pillion operated against the Consum- the freedom of the Protestant. If you reed Spetkee. He should opposes the Report.--The Re- 1 House at that time, would now be prontoveced guiity, t i ona l au thority, it was unjust. It wits carieieg into twined that apprehension, that certainly not pert was then recommitted without a division. by expunging the resolutions which acquitted him practice a principle of exclusion against tour millions good argument on the score of self-peeserie terisoe roll Ia;CINDING AN ENTRY ON TILE JOURNALS. from the Journals. This would certainly be trying of your Catholic countrymen, which you would not resisting the claims of the Catholics. But . Lord CASTLEREAGH wished to know of Lord , his Noble Friend twice for the settle offence. There your rule. that even for selfpreservation you are warrant enforce against the savage that su bmitted to A. liamiltoit in what situation his motion would ! was, he allowed, something in the conduct of his (H ear , h ear o To support such an exclusion, you adopting injurious measures of defence, not ?Lee him—whether it would be necessary fur him to i Noble Friend that was not correct. but lie could not must su ppose the Catholics, though Christians, worse imaginary, but proximate danger. If a ma; make. his defence and retire ? I consent that a ease of th is k in d should be brou g ht than Idolators, and their fl tith you must apprecOtte inflict death to protect himself against an hi Lord A. HAMILTON replied in the negative.-1 forward without receiving his disapprobation. He more lowly than that of Jove or Mahomet. What assassin, he would be guilty of murder, ate Eisob' s ect was only to expunge from the Journals re- thought- his Noble Friends who made and sup- was the best answer to such an accusation ? It was gislature which should reject the claims of solutions which appeared contradictory to each other. ported this motion, Lad been actuated by a desire g i v en in the conduct of the greater portion el die - body cfpeople, from any arprehension of rte thee began his motion by reading the resolution iof gaining popularity ; and he thought the motion Christian World. Well then, it was not against Ca - . d a n g er, would be guilty of great injustice. of the House in 1707, which declared it "to be high- ! more objectionable, because his Noble Friend, on his tholics in general, butt it was against the Irish Catho- lam told, that - if you admit the Catholics le criminal for any Minister or servant of the Crown I first trial, stood in the character of a Minister of lies. The man who would make the assertion was not liamenoe.-if you allow them power, you wit to exercise any influence of office to interfere with the Crown, and it-would not be fair or candid in the worthy of credit, and were he an Irishman that made ger the property of the Protestant, by enco i that House, and that the House would always resent House now to entertain a motion against him for the it, he would not hesitate to say that he would not be- the renewal of old claims. But this I take ard resist such attempt." After this, there was to be same offence, when he was an unprotected man. He lieve him even on his oath. Such 'an inference went : a chimerical notion, and for two reasons—: should therefore vote against the motion. to suppose , that Ireland was cursed beyond all na- - the great body of the Catholic proprietary , found on the Journals another entry in c o n se q uence of his motion respecting Lord Castlereagh and Mr. Mr. ORDE said, the Noble Lord had made his t i ons , an d that to be born in its soil was to be a mon- purchased since 1775, have purchased from Percevid. The entry., then, after stating the traffick- I motion on the ground that the Noble Lord opposite ster. It went farther, it made Ireland criminal be- tints —and secondly, that the bulk of the ' ing for scats, also declared, that as the intention had I (Castlereagh), was not meant to be brought into cause it was Christian, and by a blasphemous traffic hold their lands under Protestant titles. not been cbried into effect, the House would pass to the question. It seemed to him that the intention in the attributes of OMNIPOTENCE, made the price of probable that the Catholics would snake use the other orders of the day. Now these two resold- of the motion was to get rid of that imputation our redemption the measure of oar servitude. (Hear, eower or influence derived from an acquiesnence does were quite at variance with each other. One which was made against the House, in all the Pe- h ear .) If this depravity existed in this country, did their political pretensions to unsettle a system said" that the House would resent any such attempt," titions which had been presented, and he thought the l i t gol fing f r om physical or moral causes ? It could : which the security of their own property so and the other said they Would not. Where was the i House was obliged to the Noble Lord who brought not be physical, because, though GOD punishes, he pends? Is it reasonable to imagine that' House to learn the law of Parliament but from the l it forward, for having endeavoured to relieve them does not corrupt. (Hear, hear.) In the diffusion ! consent to sacrifice theif own titles, from a.. Journals of the House ? And when two. resolutions 1 from one of the deepest blots that had ever stained the of his blessings, that Being would not curse one side tiality to the (obsolete claims of some Mem Journals of the House. I thus contradicted each other, what was to be esteem - of a river, for the purp ose of g ivin g an argumen- their religion ? The idea is quite preposterous. ed the law ?He conceived diet this was a conside- Lord A. HAMILTON shietly repli e d to the ar- tative victory to a sect, at the other side !us suppose that no part of those penal laws • ration particularly Interesting . .at 'the e present time, go meate which-had beenurged again s t him, 'lle de-. (H e ar, bay.) Where then was the source of Irish ,in existence, .is it possible that any person When the authority, of the law of ralluntenrwas call, nied.having said any thing which the Noble Lord calamity to be traced ?To its penal laws. To them, i found to propose their enactment upon . ed in question. He really thought it-would be for: - could+, by, pessibilityp- construe into an attack upon and to them alone, could such evils be attributed. i grounds as are alledged against their repeal the dignity of the House to maktits Journals Cants- hisilleifiJia .0 0144 1 not but. think that this transaction, Ii was n ot in the air, nor in the western breeze that I hardly think it within the scope of possibil' pond with its practice. The last Session wale in some es itemeelatoodesWits 4_ blot upon the Journals of the fanned its shore, nor in the Eucharist, nor in the be-1 if so, the preamble to such an Act must '.. degree a new era of our Parliamentary history) tor it 41 0 ff b . n .. , se ih an ere ct .revsUerchlt' a he d. w bee ou a ld ia be an g y la p d ari to o h f ave it wiped lief of the Virgin Mary, that • liish misfortune was to ! 44 Whereas the French have . got pc:lesion leas then, for the first time , opal,' avowed that seats hi s conduct be canvassed. ' No, it was to be traced to those lbws i whole of the Continent, while it is armed ' prevails. be galled his Pm- it only of- o it away 'r:a.c.stant. power of 'our penal cvation of s is calcu- Id to your :o suppoie indifferent g freedomb Commis- a powerful :tual shield ,hat would. 'ho is best But I am A the Ca- lid di .troy eallyenter- ould I.e a .vation, for st IrCOIICCI, arranteJ in nut ga 111 St tnun should irnainstry and the lie- ; of a g reat. f irnagsnary :e. :s into Par. will endan- !ncouraging, e to be quite —First, that ry who have Irom Protes- he Catllo:lcs Is it then use of any luiesoence in system upon so ::usch de- i t they would I a mere par- Mem UCTS of sterous. Let sws were now son could be. 311 any such peal ? I can ability. But t run thus : I session of the yed m hostiliy I