Star. — London, England, 1822-07-05 00:00:00

_ • . -- .. . . 6. ' • . - • • - ' 11 1 -11,„1 • ' . . . ... , . . . . - • . . • • . _ ... • • -.• , e f .,(.. 7 1 ,k ; %e l - - • 7 ' ler, ' - .: - .6 x- •,t P 41: , ih............. , 4 ..,-• .a. ': I . ..c ii. • • PI . IL wa r ••• . 10 11 1, / , -I ' 4. • •.' al t .141 0. 7f • , - • ,* • ..• :,_ „,,..„..--,..... • - . c . ib i-, 1 4 . , _ . .. (.( ).S., , 1 • Tf t s,‘:..4 4 , OW-Ati • _ • . AP • Iv . .; 4 1111k AW ''...%•. . ' • • ..... / 1 .. . A. . . . • .. . .. ._ . • . . ....... . . . . - - - . • FRIDAY, Al fgt. NUMBER 11.037:. -.- • • raw; • intytt nEVE • Just published, h. d. ed. THE PAMPHLETEER'. N 0.40, COno mining 12 GMs PASPHLIMIt Sold by Sherwood and Co. Longman and Co. ice. Ste. COUNTY FIRE-OFFICE, Wo 'PROVIDENT A TIFB OFFICa- Regent-street, Los'. • • This day was published, price 7s. in boards, k RESPECTFUL LETTER to the EA,RL of LIVERPOOL, ILO. First Lord el his Majesty's Trio. ry, &c. &c. occasioned by the Speech imputed to Ms Ludship the Isle of 'Monet Bible Society Meeting. By the Rev. IL M. NORRIS, M.A. Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington 62, St. Paul's Church ; and 3, Waterl o o-place , Pall-mall Lor4 Nosnivricz, FKANcri Comm, Esq. Sir Joey Dolma, K.B. Roster Downs, Esq. M.P. Sir S. B. MOILL.AND, Bart. M.P. Wit. Plum, Esq. This day was publish* price Ss. 6d. SPEECH delivered in the HOUSE of LORDS ow rriday, June 7, 1822, by HERBERT, Lori Bishop of 'ETERBOROUGH, on the presentation of a Petition against is Exomination Questions. With explanatory Notes, a Supple lent, and a Cop y of the Questions. Printed for F. C. and J. Rivington, 3, Waterloo-place; and I, St. Paul's Church-yard. BISHOP DEHON'S SERMONS. Tbis day were published, in Two Vats. Svcs. price £1 GRACE; in bdo. CE R MONS on the PUBLIC MEANS of 11.7 the Fasts and Festivals of the Church; no Scripture Cha racters, and various Practical Subjects. vßy the late Right Rev. THEODORE DEMON , D.D. ector of St. Nlichael's Church, Charleston; and Bishop of the Protestant Episcopal Church, in the Diocese of South Carolina. Together with some Account of the Author,-and a Sermon reached on Occasion of his Death. Charleston—Reprinted in London, for F. C. and J. Rising-' on, Waterloo-place, Pall-mall, and St. Paul's Churchiard. 1 Fllr MONTIILY CENSOR; or, General Review JL of Domustic and Foreign Literature, No. 11. is just pub .bed, price 2s. 6d.—lt will contain upwards of Forty Arti ',es, and among ethos the following : —TamLocr—Cople •on on Piedestination (concluded)—Thackeray's Defence of he Clergy—Archdeacon Jefferson's (3arge.—Fouvr—Plan f Savings Bank and Work for Cbildren—ltivington's Annual --.'ster for I7o7—Raseoe's Illustrations of Lorenzo de Medici Vie de la Dischesse d'Orleans—Waddington's Visit to Ethio-. 13 —V oyag es des Freres Bacheville.—Pnvsies—Venturoli's fheory of Mechanics—Memoirs of the Astronomical Society of antlion—Phillips's History of Vegetables—Madame de Geniis Rs Jetts Chain= .... es.-IPust.m.ocr—Fortunes of Nigel—Pen )wen—AdamCarwin--Sir lt. blaltravers—Nun of ►rrouca. Print d for F. C. and J. Ttivington, i 2, St. Paul's Church !an! ; and Waterloo-place, Pali-mall ; and G. and W. B. Whit a'.•.er, Ave-Maria-lane, London. RENCII WINES, BRANDIES, AND STAVES, FOR SALE AT 11017INGDEAN, Duty Free, to pay Salvage Charges. ursuant to a Decree from the High Court of Admiralty, and tinier the permission of the Honourable the Commissioners c!' Customs and Excise, Notice is hereby given, That there wi!l be put up FOR SALE BY AUCTION, AT ROTTINGDEAN, By Mr. T. R. WILLARD, On THULSIDAY, the 11th July, 1822. at Two o'Clock in the After noon, precisely, in Sundry Lots, Duty Free, for the payment of Salvage Charges, THE FOLLOWING GOODS, VIZ. About 30 Hogsheads (mote or less) of French Red and White Wines, consisting of Claret, Burgundy, Mousel, Yin de Grave, and Hermitage. 220 Ga:lons of Brandy (more or less). 40 Fir Staves (more or less). Sundry Old Empty Casks, Old Junk and Canvas for Paper. Being part of the Cargo and Stores of the AUGUSTA, -- loom., :Nlaster, stranded near Rnttingdean, 7th December, 11420, on her voyage from Bordeaux to Boulogne. For further particulars apply to the Collector and Comptroller, Customs, Shoreham ; Thomas Beard, Esq: Rottingdean ; or J. B. STONE, Commis►iener for the Sale. Newhaven, 29th June, 1822. Samples of the Goods may be seen on the morning of the day If Sale, at Mr. Beard's Warehouse, Ruttingdean. A Deposit of E 25 per Cent. will be required. FIE best CABINET and OBLIQUE PIANO FORTES in England, not asserted without positive proof. Eminent makers have pronounced these Instruments to have the finest touch and most perfect tone that can be produced : they are m inufactured by the Inventor, at Mr. WATLEICS Manu factories, and may be seen at his Warehouse, 13, Leicester place :—their superiority is evident. References can be given to numerous Ladies and Gentlemen who have honoured hint with their commands.—A good Second-hand Cabinet, worth 60gs. for Sags.; also a fine Pedal Harp, 45gs. cost 75gs. and a new double action Harp for sgs. cost £l2O. EYTON, Stock-Broker, 2, Coax HILL, and Lom- BARD-STRICT, wishes his Friends to observe, that this Lot tery presents tue Chance of gaining Great Capitals at the most risk; for the Purchasers, after taking the Chance of the First Day, will be allowed ,to return their Tickets or Shares, whether they be drawn Blanks, small Prizes, or undrawn, and may receive nearly the Money they gave, as under : Ticket costs £2l 18 0 may receive back £2O 0 0 Half costs 11 17 0 may receive back 10 12 0 quarter costs 519 0 may receive back 5 1 0 Eighth costs 5 0 6 may receive back 215 0 Sixteenth costs 110 6 may receive back 1 6 6 All who wish to avail themselves of this offer, must bringin their 'rickets or Shares on or before the 26th of JULY, as none will be taken back after that Day :—AND THUS, each Adventurer only hazards, Thirty-eight Shillings - for a - Ticket. Four Shillings - - for a - Sixteenth. - - - TEN CAPITALS of £2OOO, £lOOO, £5OO, £2OO, &e. ARE SURE TO ac DRAW N cot Tux FIRST DAY. TWO of £30,000 !—TWO of £20,000! &c. &c. Consols and Money.—Not Two Blanks to a Prize. Begins 16th of THIS MONTH. I~AZARD and Co. who sold the Two First X 20,000 Prizes in the Last Lottery Contract, respectfully remind the Public, that the Grand Summer Lottery, containing TWO - - - •f - - - X3o,o0o! TWO &e. &c. Consols and Money. BEGINS 16TH THIS MONTH. TEN CAPITALS, Swim to be Drawn First Day! and may 'he gained by the small Risk of XI. 185. a Whole Ticket, and lihues in proportion, down to a Sixteenth Four Shillings! Purchasers, after taking the Chance of the First Day, will be allowed to return their Tickets or Shares, whether drawn Blanks, mull Prizes, or Undrawn, and may receive for them the fol lowing sums, ea. s. D. s. Ticket costs 21 1$ 0 may receive back W 0 •0 Half costs 11 17 0 may receive back 10 12 0 Quarter costs 519 0 may receive back 56 0 Eighth tests S • 6 may receive back 213 0 Sixteenth costs 110 6 may receive bask 1 6 6 All who wish to avail themselves of this over, must bring in their 'Pickets or Shares en or before the Ma et July, as rune will be taken back after that day, Tickets and Shares are Selling at Hassan* and Co.'s Old-esta Msbed Offices, Royal Each:lnc Gate; Carakiit ; and 334, Ogotd-sttsst, COMO , of SWAUW4II4i. PRESIDENT AND TRUSTEE& The Duke of Noarote, - •. The Duke of RUTLAND, The Marquis of Nostuatimost, Earl Garr, Lord Btorsaomrs, Lord Niue, Ste. &e. &e. DIRECTORS. Sir LIMIT Print, Jwsrss Sunowscir, Esq. lion. WASHINGTON Stumm WALTZ& STRICKLAND, Esq. Sir W. F. Wzray, Bart. Sir ROBINT WHAMS, Ste. tic. &c, Minaging Director—J. T. BARS'S Bsauxostr, Esq. F.A.S. PERMANENT CAPITALS, amounting to £650,000 have been formed, in addition to the• fluctuating Capitals arising front the Prattturas; which, together, consi derably exceed a Million sterling. Claims have been paid to Thirteen Hundred and Fifty Oaf ferers from fire, without a single litigation. The Profits are di vided amongst those who not► insure, as well as the original Members, in just proportion to lbeir respective payments. In the Fiat Orrice, Returns of le and 25 per Cent. have been invariably paid to all persons who have continued insured seven years, upon Annual as well as upon Septennial Pellets% and whether they have been claimants for losses or otherwise, which Returns, during the last eight years, amount to 416,020. In the Lire Orrice, Bonuses of .Cl 3. Ss. and MS. Its. have been divided during the last fourteen years; and other wry peculiar Advantages are afforded. PARLIAMENTARY PROCEEDLVGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, JULY 4. Mr. Curr, from the Nicholas Bay Company, presented the Annual Accounts of that Company.—Laid on the table. The Irish Exchequer Offices Bill, and the Welsh Coals Ito gulation Bill, were read a third time and passed. The Irish Laud Revenue Bill went through a Committee and _ was reported. Lord ERSKINE presented a Petition from a large number of Owners and Occupiers of Land in the County of Northum berland, against the Corn Importation Laws Amendment Bill.— . . Laid on the table. • The Noble Lord then presented Petitions to tho same effect from Owners and Occupiers of Land in the vicinity of the New Forest, in the County of Southampton; from the Hundred of Dunmow, in that of Essex ; and from ten Parishes, in the County of Cornwall—Laid on the table. On the motion of the Earl of LAUDZILDALZ, the second reading of the Scotch Jury Bin was fixed for Tuesday next. Mr. Baocoax and others brought up from the Commons, the Five per Cents. Contracts Bill, which was read a first time. The Marquis of LANSDOWN bad intended to ask the Noble Earl at the head of the Treasury, if he had seen him in his place, a question on an important subject. He wished to know what was the state of the political and commercial rela tions now existing between this country and the independent States of South America? If the Noble Earl should attend to morrow, he would put the question to him, unless it were incon venient; in that case be should put it another day.—Adjourned. HOUSE OF COMMONS. A new Writ was ordered to elect a Knight of the Shire for the County of Wigton, to serve in the present Parliament, in the room of Mr. Hunter Blair, deceased. Sir E. KNATCH BULL presented a Petition from certain . Freeholders in the County of Kent, expressing their dissent from a Petition recently presented as that of the Freeholders of Kent, complaining of Agricultural Distress, calling for Parlia mentary Reform, and praying the House after reforming itself, to effect a just and equitable reduction of the National Debt.' The present Petitioners dissented from the opinions to which they had alluded, and though they felt the pressure of the times severely, they prayed the House to continue to uphold the ars% tern under which the nation had flourished, and they in the 1 strongest terms enforced the necessity of sustaining public credit, which they regarded as having saved the country, by faithfully fulfilling the contract entered into with the public creditor.— The Petition was ordered to be printed. Colonel SKEFFINGTON presented a Petition front Walter Bourne, a Clerk of the Crown in Ireland, against the Bill now in the liouse for regulating the office of Clerk of the Crown. After a few words from Mr. Dawsots and Sir J. Newroar, who defended the Bill, and censured the attempt on the part of certain, individuals to establish a vested right in the offices which they held, and the fees which they had been accustomed to re-' ceive, the Petition was ordered to be printed. Colonel SKEFFINGTON presented a similar Petition from John Johnson, Clerk of the Crown at Ulster.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. GRATTAN moved that Accounts of all sums advanced to the Corporation of Derry by the Government since the Union, specifying the manner in which the lime had been dis posed of, with copies of all correspondence that had passed on the subject, should be laid before the House.—Ordered. Mr. BENNET presented a Petition from Efiezer le Mercier, of the Island of Guernsey, complaining of the state of the admi nistration of justice in that island. The Honourable Gentleman commented at some length on the circumstances complained of by the Petitioner, and hoped to hear that a remedy had been devised to meet them. Mr. BATHURS'f, in reply tithe remarks of the Hon. Gen tleman, described the steps which had been taken to ascertain the real Lets of the case, and stated the reports received on the subject to have been laid before the Law Officers of the Crown. —The Petition was ordered to lie on the table. Sir JOHN NEWPORT presented a Petition from the Householders of the Parish of St. Nicholas Without, in the City of Dublin, praying that the Assessed Taxes in Ireland may be forthwith and immediately repeated. Mr. C. H. HUTCHINSON supported the Petition, and maintained that Ireland at the time of the Union was taxed be yond her means, and this had led to the rapid increase of her debt.—The Petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. RICARDO moved 'that there should be laid before the House accounts of the quantity of Wood imported into Great Britain, from Norway, Sweden, Russia, and the other American Colonies, in 1821.—Ordered. Mr. WODEHOUSE brought in a BM to repeal so much of the Act for regulating Excise Licenses, as regarded carrying on trade in more than one place.—Read a first, and ordered to'bo read a second time to-morrow. A Message from the Lords announced their Lordships! con currence with the Marriage Ott Amendment silt, and other Bills. The amendments made in the Marriage Act Amend ment Bill were ordered to be taken into consideration on Friday se'nnight. Mr. BROUGHAM said, when his Hon. Friend the Member for Shrewsbury introduced his Bill for regulating Alehouse Li censes, he bad given notice that he proposed to found a measure on it respecting the sale of Malt Liquor. He now moved for leave to bring in a Bill to amend the law touching the retailing of Beer and Ale.—Le.te. was given to bring in the Bill.—He then brought in the Bill, which was read a first, and ordered to be read a second time on Monday, and to be printed. CASS OF THE CNIEI *ARON IN iItZLAND. The. Marquis of LONDOSDEItRY, seejng an Ho. nourable Member in his place who had given notice of a motion respecting the Chief Baron in Ireland, said, that had the House met yesterday for business, it was his intention to ask him if he would object to postpone his ti etion till e' very earlt petioct of the _ . next Session? He was induced to ask this as, under the present pressu r e of business, taking all the cir- I cumstances into consideration, he thought such a course would best satisfy the ends of justice, and enable the Hon. Gentleman to acquit himself-of his task in a manner most satisfactory to himself and to the other party.. He made this application with a strong feeling that the subject, having been brought before the House, must now be disposed of in one y or another, and it was due both to the House d to the Chief Baron to proceed with the question , is soon as possible. But it appeared to him that, 'considering the p r e se nt a dvan c ed s ta g e of the Session, land the business now on their hands, they would have !t let° fitting opportunity for entertaining it before the , House separated. It would be remembered, that at Use end of last Session the charge preferied by the inonourable Gentleman, with the answer of the Chief Baron, was referred to a Committee. The Commit- ',tee reported that there were several circumStances 'which called for explanation, which were not to be :found in the answer of the Chief Baron. A further inquiry Subsequently took place, the report of which, :he believed, did not reach the Row - till about a month from the time at which he Was speaking. It (was necessary that'this second Report should' be laid lbefore the Chief Baron for his consideration and re- - - ------- - - yiew. It had been forwarded to him. He had read and commented on it; but his letter on the subject bad not been received till within the last ten days. it had been printed for the use of the House, but had not been in- the hands of the Members more than seven or eight deys. He did not mean to say, that bad this question been the only one which demanded their attention, they might not have been fully pre pared- - ts enter upon it at that moment; but he did not hesitate to avow, that, under the pressure of the business in that'll's:Be and out of it, which had fallen on his Majesty's servants, he, though he had looked at that:document, had not been able to consider it so as to be prepared to eve a decisive opinion. So far as his intercourse with individual Members extended, he found them in the same situation. He thought it best, therefore, to throw himself on the indulgence of the Hon. Gentleman for further time. As to what- ever issue the inquiry should lead—whether it termi nated in disproving the charges, or whether the re sult should be of a more painful nature, leading to an inquiry of a judicial character, it was quite clear that nothing could be concluded in the course of the 'present Session. He. was, therefore, of opinion that the ends of substantial justice would best be an swered by postponing the motion for the present. It was painful to interpose any-delay at all, but it would be better to stop where they now were than at any intermediate stage. He therefore submitted to the Hon. Member, whether it would not be desirable that the subject should stand over till the earliest period at which it could be taken up in the ensuing Session? Mr. S. RICE was anxious to take, in the first in stance, whatever step might best promote the ends of justice; and in the next, whatever might be most consistent with the dignity and convenience of that House. It was true, that if the business were now hurried on, there would be much difficulty in getting through an inquiry of one sort or of another ; and much inconvenience would arise from commencing proceedings before they were prepared to carry them to a conclusion. But there was another inconve nience, that of keeping a charge pending over the head of an individual, without bringing the case for ward. Tor doing this he hoped he should not be held responsible. He did not mean to say that any blame attached to the Noble Lord opposite, as, upon the whole, he considered the course which he had sug gested to be the best that could be taken. There was, however, another consideration of some import ' ance. It was proper to consider how far an indivi dual could with propriety continue in the Adminis tration of Justice against wheal such a charge had been preferred. If any means could be devised to prevent this, so that the party might remain prepared to meet thh accusation directed against him,-without in the meantime acting as a Judge, he thought it would be very desirable that such an arrangement shoold be made. The Noble Marquis had admitted the importance of the charge to be such, that some issue must be had upon it, tending, as he (Mr. S. Rice) had more reason than the Noble Marquis to say he hoped would be the case, to the exoneration of the Chief Baron, or leading to a judicial inquiry. Such being the admitted importance of the case, he thought the Government would not be justified if they did not now look into it. An opportunity would be afforded them by the postponement of examining the volumi nous papers containing the details, and they would fail in their duty if they did not speedily decide on it as a Government, and make up their mind to the course which they would take on this subject. He consented to give way on the present occasion. In another Session he would not abandon the situation in which he now stood; but it was the duty of the Government to act such a part as to prove they had it at heart to secure the purity of the administration of Justice in Ireland. fhe Marquis , of LONDONDERRY said the pre sent was not the time for stating what would be the future conduct of the Government. PETITION ON TUZ CALCUTTA RANKIRS. Mr. BROUGHAM said, that in opening the case of the Petitioners, he should be saved the trouble of I narrating the circumstances of their Petition in detail to the House, by the statement which he had made regarding it on a former evening. The claim of the Petitioners arose out of a loan made by them to the Government in India, on the security of the tern- j tortes of Oude. The money so advanced was bor- j rowed to pay certain subsidies to the East India Com pany, and. being so paid came into its coffers. The territory upon which the money was advanced had since been partitioned, and half of it had come into the hands of the East India Company. Though the revenue of the territory thus acquired by the East Ipd;a Company amounted to three sterling, • - • . . they refused to pay the d e b t c l a i m ed by th e Peti tioners. As the Petitioners were thus defrauded of all means of redress and repayment, and as they could obtain no relief from the Courts In India or in this country, owing to the sovereignty of the_East India Company, they were f.bliged to seek fin. justia in the power and wisdom of Poliarnent. To skew the justice of the claim made by the Petitioners, Mr. Brougham read extracts from the di•patehet of se ' venal of the Governors-General of India, and parti cularly relied upon a letter from the Marquis Wel , lesly. After several observations upon them, he con ' eluded by moving— • " That a Committee be appointed to inquire into the jostled of the claim of the Petitioners, and to report their observation" thereon to the House." Mr. ROBINSON opposed the motion. He said that the money had been lent at a most extravagant and usurious rate, and deprecated the interference of Parliament to compel the payment of It: Mr. WETHERELL supported the motion, and contended that the loan had not ban contracted upon ustvlons terms. Mr. HUME dissented altogether from the view which his Hon. and Learned Friend (Mr. Brougham) had taken of this case. Instead of looking upon it as a matter fit for public inquiry, he thinight it, both ac cording to principle, precedent, and practice, a pri. vate subject, and to be settled between the individuals who were affected by the claim, and the party against whom it was made. Lord Cornwallis had long since declared that the Government ought not to interfere with matters of private debt in India ; and had the MarquisWeilesley (as was insinuated by the releience to his private letter) considered the present subject fit for public interference, he had had abundant oppor tunities, while Governor-General of India, of pro nusting inquiry into the transaction. The Honourable Member then adverted to the manner in which the private affairs and transactions of the native Princes in India had been conducted, and explained the man ner in which business was conducted among them and 'said, that if the House tolerated an inquiry intd this case, they would next Session have no time, even if they sat through the whole of the ensaing year, for anything else than considering applications of a Simi lar nature respecting matters of private account id India. He should, therefore, most decidedly oppose the motion—(Hear, hear). Mr. PRENDERGAST said, that in the pecuniary transactions in which he was engaged in India, and to which allusion had been made, instead of being remunerated for his losses, he was left a severe suf.!. fearer. For his own part, he had been obliged, on the principle that half a loaf is better than none, to accept one half of his claim in lieu of the si hole. He wai , compelled to abandon the other moiety, to which he' [ was equally well entitled on every principle of equity [ and right, to the Vizier. From this statement, the House might judge of the fairness and correctness with which an Hon. Member (Mr. Hume) had stated that he (Mr. Prendergast) was the only claimant who had received full compensation. Before this discus sion terminated, he would take the liberty of moving that the papers connected with his own cane be laid before the House. Mr. GEORGE SMITH felt it his duty to bear his testimony to what he believed to be the just claim of his Hon. Fiiend who had last addressed the House. His case, he thought, that Hon. Gentleman had 'clearly established._ Mr. ASTELL thought that no statement had been, made by or on behalf of the East India Company, with regard to the subject now under consideration, which was not amply borne out by the official docu ments before the House. If the House consented to entertain this Petition, there would be no end to Pe titions of a similar nature from the representatives of those who might formerly have supposed themselves to possess claims of this nature, which they had . since abandoned. Mr. PLUNKETT begged leave to say, that he had as yet formed no opinion upon the particular merits of the case t but, undoubtedly, a prima facie case of inquiry .was laid in the Petition. Among other mat ters, tending to found such a case, the Petitioners re lied on this—that from the year 1787 to 1793 the in terest upon their debt had been regularly paid. That circumstance alone afforded some, though perhaps not an unanswerable, presumption, that theirs was in fact an equitable claim. There were three classes of creditors of the Vizier—European creditors, of course subject to our Government; Hindoo creditors, sub jects of the Vizier ; and Hindoo creditors, subjects of our Government. The latter felt that though they were not Christians, yet, as being subjects within the territories of the East India Company, they had as much tight to demand justice at the hands of this Government, as if they were British•born subjects, (Hear)—and nothing was more important in thecase than this circumstance; for the foundation of the Company's power, and. of their influence over the natives of India, was the equal administration of jus tice between all the various classes of their subjects (Cheers) The security of their dominions, and their own character, alike required that . such an admini stration ofjustie should be ever carefully maintained: The East India Company, on this occasion, were cer tainly placed in no ordinary situation. These sums of money were advanced on what was said to. be due from the Vizier to the Company. That was one of the allegations advanced on the one hand, apd denied on the other, When this Vizier died, the House wete told the India Company appointed his successor - in consideration of investing him with the tei which had been governed by his predecessor,. pony entered into an agreement with him, by he took upon himself the payment of the debt from the forme' 'Vizier, although lie could not wise - - have been his iepresentative in this maul In another contract, M 1798, she Company took their own dominion one hale of the Vizier's tett' at an acquittance for this debt. Now,• on thii ment of the question, it would seem that thd• pail could nut be justifies in refusing to r 7 riot ; add Lei ri [oriel{ the Coin= by which debt duo iot othdr. wk multi etritoriim :hi's state: hi!' Cobs: meet tDt •