Star. — London, England, 1810-05-12 00:00:00

. A Tuesday ne— Lord LAUDERDALE postponed his motion till Friday next,, uioncerning East India Affairs. The Duke of ATHOL moved to postpone, oft account of tbs. absence of the Marquis of Buckleghani,the second reading of the j Gas Lights Bill, till Tuesday next. breads of privilege; they were accordingly the Bari when Sir F. PeMberton, and Sir stated that the House was right in its de- Report, after mentioning a few more cases, goes on to state the conduct of the various proceedings of arrests against Mem. their servants ; on this subject it cited the ' Lord Chief Justice De Grey, which was, Member or Member's servant was arrested, _. ravening. -- privilege of the House that he should be The.two motions following the resolutions were then put ; the , immediately delivered. The Committee bad many first efwhich, after same words from the Archbishop of Carrie ' instances of this before them • however, lh the 12th TLIBURT, and the Bishop of LONDON, was withdrawn. Tne and 13th of William and Mary, this•privilege was second, after some observations from the Archbishop r' Catir x It.. soar, the Bishop of %%MUM, and Lords HOLLAND and ; curtailed, as also in the reign ot Queen Acne ; still Haymow:lr, was negstieed.—Adjourned. ; it applied only to delivery from arrest, and did not , 1 limis the rights of the House with respect to breach HOUSE OF COMMONS. 'of privilege. It appeared to the Committee, that On the motion of Mr. W. POLE, the Dublin Hospital BM ;instituting an action against the House was a breach was read a third time and passed. of rivileges Mr. WILBERFORCE postponed the second reading of the p r and that several instances are on 4 re- Overseers' Bill to Tuesday. ' cord ot proceeding not only against the party who ' institutes the action, but againet the Solicitor. The . 'rise Committees on Irish Veit, and Ways and Mean s, we r e poitponed till Monday. , . Report concluded by s ugg estin g it as expedient, that On the motion of Mr. WHARTON, the Oil of Vitriol Bill . _ the House should give leave to the Speaker and Ser. read a second time, and referred to a Committee of .the ;role House on hlontk.---On his nint.on the West India hi- jeant to appear in Court to explain the grounds on surarce Bill was read a second time and committed. , which they had acted, and to plead in abatement of ' Mr. LUSHINGTON brought up the Rep or t o f t he Ex cho- jurisdiction. quer Bills Annuity Bill. The amendments were agreed to, and i Mr. DAVIES GIDDY, before the motion for the' ordered to be engrossed. Mr. lANG presented a Petition from the Market Gardeners report lying on the table, thought it necessary to of Surrey, Kent, Essex, and Middlesex, praying an exemption ' state to the House the three modes of conduct, either from certain clauses in the Highway Act. It was ordered to lie of which it might pursue.—First, he would have ad on the table. . vised into a prosecution at law to be entered for a breach Sir J. SINCLAIR postponed the further consideration of t h e Report of the Highway Act till this day six months. He moved o f the privileges of the Horse, had there, on looking that the Report of the Turnpike Reads Bill be now taken i nto the Journals, appeared a path of this nature consideration.--'llie Bill was ordered to be re-contained, upon : chalked out by the Constitution —The second, and which ! the better way; would be to commit to rison, for Mr .BYNG moved that the Petition of the Market Gardeners should be referred to this Committee. 1 breach of privilege, the person who had served the The House then went ittto the same Committee, when the process. That this power has belonged invariably to various clauses were agreed to and the Report received. the House is evident ; but if, in the s prescnt instance, The Irish Stage Coach Bill went till-neigh a Committee. The lit was unwilling to exert that power, at the came Report was ordered to be received on Monday. The LORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND obtained leave to time it should be understood it was within its re.ech. bring in a Bill for Repairing the Roads of the Highlands; and However, the House would decide upon this. The Bridges of Scotland. He then brought ,in the Bill, which was third mode would be to direct a•Court below to in. read a Pr,t time, and ordered to be lead' a second tune cit Wed sti•tute pleadings. With respect to this he wished to nesday r.ext. Mr. ABERCROMBIE, as he saw the Lord Advocate of Scot. ! suggest to the House, that if it should think right to land in hi: place, took the opportunity of asking him it heintended I allow the Speaker and Serjeant to plead, they must, foltilling the solemn pledge he gave last Session of brining i n a j either plead in abatement of jurisdiction or in bar.— Bill to Amend the Bankrupt I.aws of Scotland. iThe latter would require some time, but if the former The LORD ADVOCATE of SCOTLAND, in reify, stated that he certainly bad been called on to male this eledgt, but had :was adopted no time would be lost. He understood refused. However, he wished it to be understom: that to had re- that to-morrow was the last ciay of hearing such ceived such information as led him to think that the People of ' pleas. He moved that the Report should lie on Scotland would be more pleased, if those laws, with e a few Lacer- ' dons, were allowed to remain as they are. Mr. FOSTER brought up the Annual Account of the Licences, 1 Ilse L t o a r li c l i e. MILTON observed, that no one could sit paid by Lottery Office Keepers in Irsland.—Ordered to he on 'he ! silent after hearing the conclusion of the Honourable table. He then moved that the House should resolve into a I Gentleman's speech. He understood that the object '1 Committee, on Monday, to consider the Irish Susar Dress back of the Report was to defend the action which had Act, which was ordered. I . been instituted against the House. If the Speaker POIIFICX SILK. The House went into a Committee on Foreign Silks. I were to appear in such a situation, if the Court were , Mr. ROSE moved the following Resolution, " That the Chair- Ito proceed with the action, the House should consider man should move the House for leave to bring itt a Bill to profile I the situation in which it would be placed e 'We ate i bit the Importation of Foreign Silks, and to increase the shares of i about, said the Noble Lord, to defend an action in l officers in seizures." Sir J. NEWPORT had no objection to the Resolution, which I an inferior Court, when we know that the only appeal was agreed to. 1 is to the House of Lords ; the consequence resulting Mr. LUSHINGTON accordingly moved the House, and oboe j from this is that our privileges :lee to be deciLl.al on, tained leave to bring in the Bill. ;by that House. Was this House now to give up the Committees were appointed to take into consideration the Militia ostenatel of Great Britain and Ireland. i advantages it had obtained in the case of the Ayles- Mr. GRENFAL gave notice that he would on Monday move i bury election, and trace back the path it had been for copies of the correspondence between his Majesty's Ministers , proceeded in for a Century ? 'Whatever might be and the Commissioners of Assessed Taxes, on the subject of re- done with the report, be considered of inferior mo trospective surcharges. • ! ment, but he entreated Gentlemen to consider the Alderman COM BE brought up the Report of the Embezzle ment Bill ; the Amendments were ordered to be engrossed, and i fatal consequences which may ensue Weak doctrine is, the Bill to be read a third time on Monday., ; adopted. Were the privileges of the house of Com- 1 Sir I. ANSTRUTHER brought up the Report of the Cons- Mons to be overturned in the Court ef King's Bench ?i mittee on East India Affairs, which was ordered to be printed. Were they to be then frittered away ? He overheard' The Foreign Linen Bill was read a third time and passed. Mr. R. WARD postponed his motion relative to the Navy i a Noble Lord near him (Lord Folkstone) call those Estimates and additional Seamen, till Monday. ! privileges illegal, but he would maintain they were Mr. SIIER I DAN stated to the House, that in consequence of i not so---( Hear, hear.) They were tisunded on the law! a number of other Spanish Papers being necessary to be addend to 1 0f the land, and if permitted thus to be attacked and those he already wished for, he intended postponing his motion one a f ter another, those privileges by on this subject. On looking into the Order Boqk, he found the ta k en hingtut day he could fix on to be Friday sennight, un which he i which the country was protected, would soon cease should positively bring the question forward. to exist. Granting that one of these privileges was slit FRANCIS BURDETI. improperly used, was the House on that account to ' • The SPEAKER ,acquainted the House that he give up one of the greatest safeguards it and the lei. bad received a letter from the Earl of Moira, which, tion possessed ? He hoped that Pitmans:Kea would if it was the. pleasure of the House, would be read. eavert the day that the Speaker of the House of Com- The letter was in substance is follows : Lmono should appear a pleader at the bar of the Court " st• lateen rues s May S. 'of King's Bench • then might their privileges be said s'Sta...-Mr. Arrow, my Solicitor, has represented to me a t o ' be at an end. circumstance, which ! think incumbent on me w impart to you. i It is, that Sir Francis Burden has commenced a suit in the Court Lord FOLKSTONE did not intend to addrkss of King's Bench against me, as Cqpstable of the Tower, for ille- the House, had not an expression of his been over , gal detention in prison. Ido not write thts for the purpose of heard by the Noble Lord who had just sat down.— I soliciting your interference, as I have already directed my Solicitor He contended that there might arise a state of privi -1 to defend the action, en the grounds of the warrant of the Speaker of the House of Commons, and that of the Secretary of State. lege illegal enough to be disputed in a Court of I am, Sir, etc. " 1401 RA." Justice ; for instance, if it huh assumed the power of The Letter was ordered to tx entered on the Journals. , pillory; suppose it had sent Mr. Gale Jones on a REPOItT CF THE COMMITTEE OF FRIVILEGiLS. horse, with his face to the tail, to Charing-cross, b . Mr. DAVIES GIDDY brought up the Report of the r e to be put i n th e pill or y, an d a f terwar d s sent to l the Committee on the proceedings had and to be had Newgate, in such a case it would be unjust ; if theta.; on the notices, &c. of Sir Francis Burdett. was no redress, it would be monstrons if it had exer- t The Clerk then proceeded to read the Report, cised such a right. He wished the House to take, which was of teonsiderable length, and to the follow- I into consideration the suggestion of pleading in bar. 4 I ing purport : He thought the report deficient in many points on After recurring to the events of the sth of April, which it pretended to inform the House. He advert-' the Report proceeds to enumerate the various sub. ed to its statements respecting the proceedings in a jects of its consideration, namely the Speaker's war- Court of Justice is the third of Charles I. and its ar rant ; Sir Francis Burdett's letter ; the report of the summits on the Bill of Rights, which he said.did not Serjeant at the Bar ; the notices, process, and writs relate to any thing in but out of Farlhuneet. The on the Speaker and Serjeant, which latter, the Report case of Sir J. Elliot, which had been contended as a observes, are subscribed with the name of Ellis, So. breach of privilege, had been tried in the Court below, licitor, and are for the purpose of bringing as a ques- nor was the declaration then sufficient till a writ r I tion in a Court of Law the conduct of the House.— error bad been entered in the House of Lords. The It then states the wish of the Committee to collect Report had taken notice of the case of Sir F. Peni as nearly as possible, in one view, this important sub- i berton, but he conceived it impossible on this ground ject, and to prove, from Parliamentary History, that ! to maintain the doctrine of pleading in abatement of the right of the House in committing to prison for jurisdiction. If this were persisted in, it would be breach of privilege is well founded on many instan- impossible not to examine the privileges of tile House, ces and precedents, to state the various proceedings hut if it had been acted upon according to those pri at law, and their acknowledged analogy to the sub- j vileges, which he acknowledged to be a known ject in question. These latter.topics, however, would I law, titough as Lord Coke observes, not much be reserved for another Report. The Committee I sought after. could confidently state that the practices adopted 1 Mr. WHITBREAD rose to order.—The question were usual, and founded on the instances which arose I before the House was, whether the repo r t sh ou ld lie from the proceedings of Charles I. and 11, when their i on the table ? The Learned Gentlemen, he said, who innovations were resisted, and resented by the House ! framed this paper, should tell the House what they of Commons ; which finally and directly led to the I intended to do, and not endeavour to take advantage Bill of Rights. The Committee did net hesitate to 'of what might be now said.. To the question itself say, that an article of the Bill of Rights directly ea- he had no Objection. tended to the present case. On this subject the law ' Mr. W. WYNNE agreed with the doctrine of the of Parliament is especially declared in the Rolls of ; Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Giddy). He was of opinion Henry VIII. when it appears it was expedient always '..that whatever related to the privileges of the House, to allow full costs and punishment for the protection should be discussed here and no where else. In this of its privileges. The Report then cites the case of principle he could see nothing contrary to reason or Sir J. Elliot in 1604; and then that-ot J. Topham justice. He then quoted the case of Mr. White, who in June, 1679, who was Serjeant at Arms, and against in the year 1669 had been fined £lOOO for being whom, for discharging the commands of the House ' guilty of a breach of privilege. It is certain that a judgment had been granted ; on this the Hou s e re- the Hous e m i g h t h ave a b use d i ts pr i v il eges i n one or solved, that the Judges of the King's Bench had been two instances, but it did not therefore follow, that it .. - %. . . - - - , , Ihd. lie had in his conytiatiosi 11Atit an Noble Ph ta br APO PARLIAmENraRr PIiOCZEDINGS. ..Irl (HAITOWby ) Oil this subject heard nothing of oaltetiPto thi he clause. Had he known of itAe.should not have F. lunes, sta .--, j proposed his Resolutions. He would withdraw them t oisiPn• The HOUSE OF LORDS, MAY 11. i Or, inserting 'this clause in them, let 'them take the minor cases, Several private Nils were brought up fro& the Ceorohnli . sense of the House. House in var The Marquis of LANSDOWNE, in consetisence of other The Earl of HARROWBY thanked the Noble bens and thei p nay.;:g been moved for, postponed his motion till Friday DM :Lord for the candid manner in which he had brought opinion of I Lord MELVILLE postponed his motion respecting the Ad- the business forward, and stated that he did not know that if a Men iniralty, till Tuesday_ next. . .. /of the.clause himself t il l that morning. .it was the pi . THE CLERGY. Lord HOLLAND, after moving the Order of the Day, rose to submit certain Resolutions to their Lordships' House, of which he had given notice, He thought, that his intention must have been niisconcei- I ved by many Noble Lords. He had been represented as bringing forward a most monstrous proposition, as intruding, in some measure, on the sanctum sancto rum, and as profanely venturing to touch the Arch chancellorship, tho' it were only to prevent its falling. He had no such intention. Ne man respected more than he did the sacred right of property, whether vested in an individual or in any general body of men. But when the country laboured under such severe burthens, he thought that every class of his Majesty's subjects should take their share in them, and thus alleviate the general pressure. It had been .solemnly recommended in his ivlajesty's speech at the conclusion of the last and the beginning of the pre sent session, to make a provision for the inferior cler. gy. He was ready to allow, that no description of men were more meritorious. But were there no other means of relieving their distresses than by increasing the load of taxes which already pressed so hard upon the people ? Was there not a fund in the First Fruits and Tenths originally destined for their use, which might now be made available for that purpose, without laying any additional burthea on the shoulders of the people at large ? The Noble Lord then entered into an historical examination of the origin and destination of the first fruits and tenths from the time of Henry VIII. down almost to the present times. He particularly insisted on an act of illat Prince, which authorised the issuing of a com mission. whose duty it was to resurvey and revalue annually the clear improved amount of the first fruits and tenths of benefices. This law had never been repealed, and might therefore be put in force. By enforcing . that act, an ample fund might be provided for relieving the distressed state of the poorer Clergy, a fund to which indeed they were originally entitled, although of late years it was possessed and enjoyed by the superior Clergy almost exclusi7ely. The No ble Lord then traced down the history of this fund through the reigns of Henry the Eighth, Edward the Sixth, Elizabeth, Ann, and George the Fire., infer ring from all these different Acts a right of the infe rior Clergy to the full enjoyment of those funds. The Noble Lord concluded by moving eight resolutions, five of which were merely historical positions resting on the Acts he had quoted, and three more as practical deductions to be inferred from these Acts. The Archbishop of CANTERBURY confessed that the strong language used by the Noble Lord, on giving his notice, had surprised him. His Grace mentioned an anecdote of /Edward the Sixth, who was advised by (he believed) the Protector, to order a new Commission for a similar purpose to this, for the purpOse of filling his coffers. The King applied to the Lord Treasurer, and asked his opinion, which was contrary to such a scheme. The King replied, that he should have thought him . a knave, if he had riven him ether advice. If the Noble Baron was right an censuring Mr. Burn for an omission (and in that respect he agreed with the Noble Baron), could it be ald canchd and fair in hini to omit a whole clause in the Act of Queen Anne, which his Grace then read, and which, he said, he thought was conclusive en the subject ? The clause . stated, that instead of five bonds which had annually been, for some time, re quired of the Clergy, only four should bereguired ; and the valuation, &c. to be made and levied the same as heretofore. • The LORD CHANCELLOR supported the rights of the Clergy, but thought the clause alluded to might possibly bear two constructions under the circumstances of the Commissions that were out at the passing of the original Act. But the length of tinfe during which the Legislature had permitted the habits of the Clergy to be regulated as they had been, would, under a change founded on the Noble Baron's itesolutions, be exceedingly unjust. His Lordship .noticed, the almost impracticability of executing such commissions, and illustrated the case of the Clergy by that of the Land-tax. Lord GRENVILLE was of the same opinion ; but he thought the clause seemed drawn up to settle the quesion iTor ever. The First Fruits, especially, he . thought the least eligible of all modes of taking mo sey from the Clergy for any purpose, and dwelt upon Abe barOilps to which it subjected a clergyman, thus first making arrangements for his settlement in life. 'Length of usage, his Lordship also contended, created a sort of right equal to a law on the subject ; *specially in a case of the present magnitude, where it was absolutely impossible to attempt a measure of this kited, with hope of benefit, seeing how much of the church property, and of this very description in particular, was at present in the hands of the laity ; arid which could not be disturbed, a circumstance which he thought, on the whole, greatly advantageous to the whole system of the country. As for the larger :provisions of the superior Clergy, he thought that it was desirable that in every profession there should be high and advantageous situations for talents and vir tue to arrive at. Few could obtain them, bot they gave dignity and shed lustre on the whole. He com plimented Lord Holland highly, and said, that no Noble Lord, for his abilities, temper, and love of jus tict, was better fitted to take up a measure in which Such great interests were concerned. The Earl of HA R ROWBY concurred in the ar. ituments which had been used by those who opposed the present motion. Lord REDESDALE thought the 26th Henry admit th( istruction adopted by the bef - the had he VIII. did not admit the construction adopted by the Noble Baron who had brought this subject before the House, . • Lord HOLLAND made a short reply, and con. - fessed that he was not aware of the clause produced by the Most Reverend Prelate, who, he observed, had viewed the Statute of Henry in the same light as he • gs:tattithicenu'i(ii‘relovt:l'ua:elsrtrimineetroaoernoopQthnfneclroeelttaeimi;tieer(Jrfirnt'tt: o sl f rou p l r d iv t il o e tall ge, y w re h s i t c g h n twheerttes.so nticleri.yPboael,apnlier_dsat.T'd: .of opinion that it was • absurd to argue on th •- •: e 1 ,• , principle of destrqing . the privilege- ' Pa,; was encouraged, the King n:ilbt order ti: , .l;‘ ment of Foot Guards to maim into th e Lords and take their feats as Peell. Tim the of Parliame i n n t stl s fi h ce o th u m, l s d i convinced was the fi rst principle of the Connit;•l* that power it might perhaps abuse ; but it not, therefore, fao . ander the jurisdiction of as rvitoi with equal decide on the conduct of that of King's Bench. Co l o on smi o rin u il rti av a p n ipoi d liati a eia rn low ed hi and the opinion of that Committee was, that bert Sawyer ought to be heard by Couns e l, 4141 , Attorney General was directed accordingly to ( 1, 1 ,. him. There was another case, which was an art,, brought by my Lord Peterborough for aCICII, which was compromised by the payment old to the amount of £l5O. l'he3e cases, howe‘ er .• sufficient to stew, that in all t i mes t h e posseranc, thorny of the House had been exercised, and - denied, when it became a question in any of t , Courts of Law. In addition to these, Gently if they would take the trouble to refer to k North's Life of the Lord Keeper Guildford, vA, .find a case in which one Burdon, an AttelTer, ing infringed the privileges of thii HJuse, utsord• ed intJhe custody of the Sajeant at Arms; it happened, that before the Set jeant at Arms co l arrest Burdon, the -House was prorogued, a n d don brought his action of damages against the rant for assaults,as often as he att e mp te d to taker ' Burdon resisted the execution of the warravt, The ATTORNEY-GENERAL rose te oak; fall and entire approbation to the explici t state/ of the LcArned Gentleman, in answer to the TPA which the Noble Lord had given, why th e H. should not be allowed to hold the possession of jurisdiction which they claimed. The whale of arguments of the Noble Lord went to inculce opinion that if this jurisdiction was allowed, th was unconstitutional, because the subject must having no Court to which he could apneal in ca: wrong. It that argument went for any thing, it equally applicable to a Court of Law, Ire making every allowance for the infirmi:ies of nature, the decision might be that tlic House h. right to imprison, and that might be supposed; ror in judgment. He would suppose an actint brought in the Court of Common Pleas, and suw decision was come to, that a WTI it of error was I / the King's Bench, and that the Judges sllonl , lude tqgether to defeat the law of the lant'. could nut for a moment believa), and that the J, resort was the Huse of Lords, who should, or. appeal, come to a similar decision. Then, he , :ask, what remedy had the party aggrieved who fered by the decision I—Would it be contended, because a jurisdiction might, in the exercise et abused, that, therefore, it could not exist in it Such a proposition was monstrous, and if obtain, must not only put an end to all the price but also to the adniinistratioa of justice Court in the kingdom. The Learned G;•,;, opposite had so well elucidated the subj:ct, *as not necessary for him to say more on th:1; of the case, to allow the interference of a;,v lower Courts would be to part with all juri.: as well might it be sa:d that the Court of Session had the right of interfering with the C' King's Bench, or the highest tribunal, the Hole Lords, as that the Court of King's Bench coil' trout the jurisdiction of this House. The How Commons were the sole judges of their own j leges, and of the event of them. When the came before another Court, th tt. Court would to the decision of this House. in regard to its leges, by that decision they are bound. and nue accordingly. Mr. PONSONBY observed, that the only qt now wa i s, whether the report should lie ou the and he regretted that the House had not &Tie, question before they had enter: into what he ceived to be a premature discusiion. The mime lug of the report on the table signified no mere main question, than if he were to talvt off It and throw it on the table. (4 leash.) He 1 theregeore, that House would put an end to all !tension on th,.t score, and let the report be lair the table ; that being accomplished, he hoped nisters would then muster up resolution enonglt s. the House tvliat course they meant to recommcni the occasion. The question was then put, and the report to lie on the table. Mr. DAVIES GIDDY again rose to mike tion founded on the report. He expressed his that some Gentlemen named on the Committee not done their duty by attending in the Canimir ( Hear, Htar,) —lsecause then their opinion, have been known. The Hon. Gentleman thew pitulated what he had stated on moving, that t! port he laid on the table, As to the three modes . pursued, viz. first, the inhibition to the Courts of in proceeding in the action ; secondly, as to the mitaal of every person concerned in aping out the against the Speaker; or in serving the notice 01 ( which would not preclude the parties knot rn ing in the action), and thirdly the pleading in nuation, or in b.tr, to the action. He therefore: move that the Speaker and Setjeant might, as was nu time to be lost, be permitted to Appeat plead, meaning to f011 , .w up that motion with ther, that the Attorney-General be directed to i them. The Hon. Gentleman, after making some ther observations, moved, " That the Speaker arid Serjeant be permitted to app ple:al to the said actions." On the question king put, Mr. PONSONBY arose. He presumed 'lt: motion just made met with the concorren:e Majesty's Ministers. Before he ;•roczetle.t to understand whether he was c.orrect in t:i.tt • sition? The CHANCELLOR of the XCHl'.(2.'t said, he had nu hesitation in saying that he adr:sed motion, and he wished the Hut. Gentleman always act with the same candour. Mr. PONSONBY said, if he had been in the of the Right Hon. Gentleman who had just sat 4 he would not have drawl , the. House iuto such said, ht e nter. . I: Part i nt k . le 11, 54. rt 't the Co, 'wer k o nstior.i4.• it it 1. of a n i ri ettali , itti. %w e 3eads. iced thte a hi ftt44 merits that Sir k :ly to as a n at .,; . Af :of din t ,, live ver , )Wee arid; Per any o f Gent to svo° h ', %rots ord Inns; it Arms co t: and h [an th S. Ito taker warrant. e to offer . :it stater,' o the TeAN( r the It essina of t whlle of incu:c4:e * )wed, tr t must s cal in wise it s l iec; :les of to. limn had Lpposed an au action , and sue or was ha!, oat. at the could, or • len, he v.' :ved who ntoittied, rcisc rf i:, list in I.t\i I if suifertd the prii. stice Gfentkr. abj:ct, CH4 : on that . of any of I of Oa,: the eat the Hon,. ich could c. l'he Hou,c eir own prii hen the c.. t would 1., d vi its pr . ! and must only quest' ou the to t decided he rhe mere u Mere to off his He Ito t to al wt be laiJi e hoped 1 enonglt to • ecommcnd port ordem o mike a in sed his reir ommittee ii Committee tni;!! IA theft lagildro':s t nice oit the ws mite o g s tr tt h o 4 in t arrow sho ight, as o a pisrar 4, ticn with coed to defer ;ing some d to 3E1 44 ' !fled r:itt l% irren:e of . 1 .. t:i.tt ICHEQUE. he advised t! ticman w en in the just sit into such •