Star. — London, England, 1810-03-08 00:00:00

Lifir INTELLIGENCE. *COURT OP KING'S BENCH, MARCH 7. PREACH OP 'PROMISE OP MARRIAGE. Mica s v PLOWER.— Mr. PANE said, this was an action brought by Miss Mari Millis against the De fendant, Mr. Benjamin. Flower, who was a widower, to recover satisfactiori in damages for that which was an extremely cruel injury to her, and which injury the defendant had occasioned and indeed he was set aware of an injury of a more , serious nature that could be sustained by a person in the situation of the plaintiff, it being a breach of promise of marriage bhe was a young woman extremely well connected; was the daughter of a respectable ribbon-manufac turer at Coventry. The defendant was a person of considerable business, property, and fortune, likewise in - the 'same trade, but his wholesale warehouse was. in town ; he became acquainted with the family of I the plaintiff, he having large dealings akCoventry in the riblym trade, although his residence wash; Lon don. These caws were apt to excite ludicrous obser vations; but they were often, and indeed generally, very serious to the party aggrieved; and, in this pun ! ruler instance, it wat his duty to state, that the.con duct of the defendant hid been shameful, attd what ever 'might be said with a view of turning the matter altogether into ridicule, it was in hi opinion, and with his habits, and at his time of life it beteme him to say, that this case would have due consideration where it ought to have it, that was, with. his Lord ship and the Jury. The defendant was a man of very considerable pro perty, the father of many children, had lost his wife before he became acquainted with the present plain tiff. .He expected that she. would not have it in her power to give sufficient evidence against him to prove a promise of marriage • but in that he would be dis appointed. Undoubtedly the promise of marriage, must be clearly proved, before the plaintiff could recover in this action ; but the Jury should be satisfi ed of that fact, by a very long correspondence he had read over, which had taken place between these par ties, many parts of which were quite diseuying— not obscene, very far from it—but quite ctisgusting, on account of the hypocritical cant which marked the stile of the defendant in his letters to the plaintiff. which he must have read in Court, because he could not, otherwise, prove the promise of marriage, made on the part of the defendant ; but, in those letters, he had, over and over again, made that promise to the plaintiff. It would appear in these letters, that the defendant had several children, and that he hoped ff the plainti.would take upon he rself the cares of a mother for them ; but that he did not think it decent he should marry her until twelve months had elapsed after the death of his first wife. There was not hin g more disagreeable to a man deeply impressed with just sentiments of 'religion--nothing metre-disgusting to a man who thought rightly on these subjects, than to see puritanical cant and hypocrisy assume the cha racter of pure religion; and the letters of the defen dant contained such a tissue of enthusiasm, rant, and nonsense, that it would be impossible to hear it without disgust ; and although that was not a consi deration on which the damages should be enlarged, yet nobody would, on that account, be sorry that the damages were not Small. And although the person wliO could write such nonsense was not one with whom it could be very desirable, he should think, to 'ass a life with, and therefore this lady lost but lit tle by" losing him ; yet that was mere matter of take. If he had promised to marry her, and had committed a breach of that promise, she had a right, by law, to seek compensation for that breach of pro mise. This cause might have been tried much' sooner, but that she could not have his (Mr. Park's) assistance when the cause stood for trial. She might have much abler assistance, and in this, too, he thought her taste questionable; but in this also she had k *r_ight to judge for herself. Mr. b asic then proceeded to read different parts of the letters of the defendant to the plaintiff, of which we shall give. but a short extract in the evi deuce ; for they are so voluminous, that the full re rznof themwould fill the half of a newspaper ;_ . these Mr. Park maintained there was no doubt that the defendant had, over and over again, pro suiied marriage to the plaintiff; and, when he should Wive established that tact, the question would be, what damages. the Jury would give ? He was not aware what course the defence was to take. He did not know whether any attempts would be made to traduce and vilify, or asperse, the character of this Lady. Of course he knew how to meet that, if it I should be attempted by proof, because be should have 1 an opportunity of observing on it : he was instructed i to say, that she was perfectly respectable. But if there was to be no evidence called to attack the cha racter of the plaintiff, quite sure .he was, that, what- ever the defendant might wish, the Learned Counsel who had the care of his defence would not desert their usual candour by stooping to cast reflections on the character of a female suitor in a Court of Justice, ' in a manner that deprived her of defending herself by her Counsel, which would be the case if her charac ter was attacked by a speech only ; for, in that case,. he would' not have the privilege of a reply. He knew, that if 'the Learned Counsel for the defendant were instructed . to attack the character of this Lady, without calling any witnesses to support those in. structicnr, they would, as men of honour, treat such instructions with scorn and contempt . As for da. mages,.it was never his habit to press for any from viticlicnve motives —the Jury were sufficient judges of them in all cases, and particularly in cases of this 'kind, after bearing all the circumstances of it. The short statement and sum total of the facts were—the defendant was a person of property, and in a respec table line of business ; the plaintiff was well connec ted in life, of a reputable family, and her own cha r icter pe rfectly irreproachable. He had repeatedly promised to marry her ; bad held to her that hope, and led her to form that expectation. He had totally disappointed those hopes, rendered their accomplish ment impossible, by marrying another Lady. Under these circumstances, the Jury would say what da mages she ought to receive of this defendant. James Woodby was called, for the purpose of 'proving the hand writing cf the defendant. He made a great number of attempts to chew, that be did not knew it ; bat, a' last, being asked by Lord ELLEN 139110trJii, v hether, if be had received one of those letters. directed to himself, he should have answered it ? He said, he certainly should have done that.— ley *likh it was nrenifest he believed it to be the 1 defendant's writing, and which was all he was asked to say. James Lamb, who had been warehouseman to the defendant, but was frit now, proved . the other letters to be of the defendant's hand writing. The letters were then read. The first was dated Lond(,n, the 9th of September, 1604., from the defen. dant to the plaintiff, containing, among a MASS of other matter, the following.: " My dear Miss Mary fvfi!lis--I received your's of the 29th of August; the connection and Contents considered, 'hurt me very much ; I could not help kissing it. I cannot help saying you , aro the only object in this lite I wish to realize, as.other objects in this world have no charms for me. What reason I have to him Gun for his goodness, and not to repine! 0 ! that I could live in constant acknowledgment of Goo, and submission to him in all his Providence. May the Loan direct what part we shall' act, as the only Master of our senses. I had a little trouble yes terday, merely on a:count of the servant maid; that is a thing I knew nothing of in Mrs. Fowler's life-time. I could wish you were bore, partner of my toil; but cb you rather wish me com fort. lknow you will love my children when you know them,"&c. ANOTHER HAS SENTENCES OF Tills KIND. " My dear Miss M—" I cannot tell what to think on coming to Coventry, because I kpow I could not come hack without you, and I should not wilh to remain there, until twelve months after the decease of Mrs. F. (which was the time agr.ted upon for the union of these parties).-11 you love me, keep me near your —[Then follows an emblem, or hieroglyphic of the heart.) —I do not mind what any one will say—the trouble is between Goo and myself." - -------- A NOTHER . " My dear Mary—This appears to be a long silence; but as my being in town was so uncertain, I thought my letter would fall'into other hands; but as I am one of the Lords of the Crea tion, I sl•ould not like disappointment. Do not fail to send by Monday's Post. My Dear, I long to see you at,the head of my ' table. lam quite tired of a single life. I know of no charms in life hut you. PM:WIDEN cr. has been extremely kind to me. in a servant. I have one front (Word. I wish you with us, my dear,' &c. ANOTIII3R. "My Dear—l received your s, and should have answered it sooner, but I had expected to have seen you in person, and I had some thought of calling at Barton's, to take you by surprize. It was rather too bad to tantalize me to walk with you. If I was not there in person, I was with you in my—heart [in an emblem, hieroglyphically.} —The season of the year is so gloomy, I must postpone coming at present. You say, you were fearful you had been too open with me; the reverse would hurt my feelings very much. Do not be afraid of being too open ; I love you the more for it. Only twelve months after the decease of Mrs. P. and I Will put the question to you ; ' hether you will obey I trust you will be all passive obedience and non-resistance. lam a poor sinful creature, and have lost the viral power of godlineso. We have preachers day and night in London,and yet I want heavenly time fur the delightful enjoymvat. lam happy, my dear, in this Pfe,however ; hut you can make me still more so. Your two letters were well wrote ; but the last I could hardly make out. — Was you in love ?—Con bless you." ANOTIIER. "My dear Mary—l am fearful of some unforeseen or unplea gant business. I expected an answer ever sinse last Monday week. I shall not rest, night-or day, until I hear from—.--.Gon bless you alor all dine and to eternity. ' • ANOTHER. "My dear Mary—l hope, if we should be spared to see one another again, in the face of one another in the fah, to make you happy, and be your good boy. 1 have been most unfortunate, but never mind that—there must be a revel In our lot byre. The ser vant-maid, for want ofei mistress, has become very dirty. I have bad two advantageous offers, with a great deal of mosey. It I had not determireo. with you, I should have determined to remain as I am—for I won't? not have the Queen." ANOTHER.—After taking notice of his affection, on account of the dangerous illness of his child, pro-, ceeds : " Pray, for me, that the GOD of all mercies may disappoint all my fears; bless the Loan, and pray him to direct me in the leading ways of his Providence; for we trust wait to see what' the will of the ALMIGHTY is to my child. I have read your dear letter, which filled my bosom with consolation, thinking I shall have a dear soul to sympathize with me. My—heart Lin an em blem, hieroglyphically] is with ydu, and when PaoitocNct shall permit, believe me I am all passive obedience and non-resistance." ANOTHER—written at Stoney Stratford, as the de fendant was on his way to Coventry, apparently for the purpose of celebrating the intended marriage : "My dear Mary—l have just time to say, if you please, it is toy intention to be at Coventry to-morrow to diner," Jim Ike. • The Reverend Mr. Brooksbank said he was ac gnainted with the defendant, who introduced him to j his present wife ; had been acquainted in his family, ' he supposed, for three or• four years; had baptized one of his children fur lairn--ti child he had by his present wife. Cross examined I,f / Mr. G A RRDW. This Reverend Gentleman said the defendant was greatly enfeebled by disease ; had received a paraly 'tic stroke, which had greatly affected both his mind and body ; but that was since his marriage with his present wife ; before which this witness did not know him. Mr. Bright, a ribbon manufacturer, had known the defendant for five or six years ; had some little dealings with him in business ; could not say he was a man of property ; knew nothing on th. 46 subject. Cross-examined by the ATTORNEY. GENBRAL. He said the defendant was remarkably feeble, un able to walk ; he was in a very bad state of health before the death of his last wile. The witness always understood . him to be an unsound man. He has, of late, grown worse a great deal. The witness al ways understood the defendant's disorder to be a paralytic. Mr. Howse, a shoe-maker, living next door to the defendant, who lives at No. 20, Gutter lane, Cheap side, said he was a ribbon manufacturer; did not be lieve he was a man of substance ; rather thought him a man not worth money, only very well to carry on business; had a good deal of business ; but the witness did not think he had any thing else. Mr. Jacob said the dele. dant had a ribbon manu factory at Coventry, but did not think he had one in Spitalfields ; was a wholesale dealer in that article. This was the substance of the case on the part of the plaintiff. The ATTORNEY•GENERA L, for the defendant, made a very keen and sarcastic speech against the plaintiff?s case. He commenced with, observing that the plaintiff had made a judicious choice, by selecting his Learned Friend, Mr. Park, for her cause ; but sub mitted that the injury which she complained of took place in the year 1805, and she did not commence her action until the year 1807, and then she did not proceed in it till the year 1810 ; and as to her hay ing the assistance of Mr. Park as her tileunsel, she had had twenty opportunities for that advantage i since the commencement of her action ; but the truth. was, she felt her case to be hopeless. At first she' l did not skink of commencing this action ; but she was persuaded to it by Mrs. Mason, the wife of her At torney, and the action was only brought to play up on the nerves of the defendant ; it was not fax the defendant's person, but his :old, that this lady had taken an affection. The truth was this—after this ac tion was brought by way of bait for the defendant, to make him part from a sum of money (tor the ac tin was nem meant to bb brought to trial) she • , tholletf that hris threatening to have the nonsense c this oy fool read in a Court of Justice, “ for art 010 fool he Is," said he; " I am obliged so to tall my client, for he is an old fool—she was in hopes .of .ob taining some money of him ; but the- fish would not bite ; nor was the plaister of the drawing quality this lady and her advisers expected. -Hertie they were driven to the present trial. The short history of the case was this—the defendant being borne down by illness, was advised in the year 1804 to try what a mouthful of country air would do for him. He went to Coventry, where ht had some friends and Connec. tions in trade ; there he was advised to ride on horse- I back. He took that advice; but he had not proceed ed long, before he and his horse dissolved partnership, .and parted company : in plain English the horse threw him down. He was taken up—this lady hap , pened to be in the way to afford a lotion for his bruised shoulder, and kindly assisted in admini!..-er ing it, by rubbing the old man's flesh herself.—., .This made him think, for the moment, that he .might be fit (because he wished he was) to be her !husband : but alas ! alas ! this was a forlorn hope. —He entertained it, however, for a while, by her flattering and coaxing. This gave birth to those absurd letters , which had been read in Court.-1 Her object was to get this old dotard to promise her marriage ; for which purpose she inflamed him with letters corresponding to those he had written to her. But soon after this correspondence took place, 'the parties and their pursuit became, as they-ought to become, objects of the ridicule of those who were acquainted with the facts. The defendant having recovered the little sense he now possessed, determin ed on declining that for which he was so palpably unfit, and took an opportunity of consulting with Mr. Horsfall, a person who lived next door to this lady, mentioned the rumour of this correspondence to him, and asked him whether it was not a very absurd mat ter ? to which Mr. Horsfall candidly said, :hat nothing could be.more so. So then he communica ted to the lady his determination not to marry her. - Well, but the lady having got the promise of mar , • riage by all these letters, the next thing to be done was to get her own up from him ; for she knew that • while he had them they would be an answer to her, demand for damages in a Court of Justice ; she pro posed, therefore, th.t they should break off the con nection, and mutually deliVer up, each to the other„ all the letters that bad *passed between them ;—to which the defendant consented, and delivered to her all her letters ; but no sooner had she got her own: letters back but she laughed at the defendant, saying she would keep them ; and she ever afterwards laughed at the defendant for an old fool, whom she __never cared for ; forall that she wanted of him was, his money. &c: Bat still it would not do to bring on the action ; for it would be - impossible for her to per suade any body that she had sustained any loss by not having such a person for her husband, and with out it, she could not recover a shilling ; she therefore rested upon her oars. At last an incident occurred. that put her in spirits ; the defendant's present wif , vas brought to bed, and then the plaintiff though she might make out some loss, for that, by right, thatf shild ought to be her's, and that, therefore, she had sustained a loss in not having the joy of being the mother of that bantling, so that she was rather wait:, ing for this child, than for the dry-nursing of Mr. Park in- conducting her cause; to what extent the want of the enjoyment of being the mother of this child might have affected this lady,•it was difficult to ascertain precisely) but certain it was, it had the im mediate effect of stimulating the pursuit of this ac tion." To proVe the whole of this case, and parti cularly that this lady lost no affection by losing the defendant (for she never had -any for him) be should call Mr. Horsfall, who should state that she said as much. to him after the connection broke off ; and then as to damages, he had not thought it necessary to say one word upon the subject, the smallest denomina tion of coin known to this realm would be ample com pensation in this case to this plaintiff. Mr. Horsfall said he had been acquainted with the defendant for twenty-five years, whom he de scribed to be a very feeble man, both in body and mind, entirely unfit to contract marriage at the time he held this correspondence ; the witness was a mar ried man, and had children, one of them a daughter 17 years of age, lived next door to she plaintiff's fa ther, at whose house she lived ; had a conversation with her after her letters were given upby the defen dant to her, which, she said, she obtained under a promise of returning his to him, but that she said she should not do that ; the witness joked with her in a conversation.—" I asked her," said he, "how she could think of such an old fellow ? She said, she did not mind that, she only wanted a better situation than she had got, and that he had some money."— She was about the age of 40, and the defendant turn ed. or 50. The witness had visited him, and dined with him, and a personhe calls his wife, but he never saw them married, nor did be hear the defendant call her his wife, although she was at the head of the table as a wife, &c. This witness evidently wanted to insinuate that the defendant was not married, with a view to cast a doubt on the plaintiff's right of ac- l i tion ; but that did not answer the purpose, for there was no doubt of that marriage, from the evidence of i the Reverend Gentleman who visited the family, and I who baptised the child of that marriage. After a reply by Mr. Palm, Lord • ELLENBOROUGH observed, that the letters which had been given in evidence in this case, were a mixture—a melancholy mixture, of lasciviousness and fanaticism, injurious alike to delicacy, to virtue, to morality, and to religion. The promise of the defen dant to marry this lady was clearly proved, the single question was—What damages she ought to have for i the disappointment ? To be sure the loss of the so ciety of a person diseased by paralysis, and his mind' overpowered by fanaticism, could not be said to be great; but th'en the plaintiff had a right to complain of her disappointment, and the manner in which the first witness fenced with the question, about the hand-I writing of the defendant, and the coarseness and offen sive nudity of expression of the last, sheaved the tem per and disposition with which the defendant had en.* deavoured to defeat the action. That the defendant was not, as the witness had wished it to be thought, absolutely incapacitated for the married state was. clear, since his bed had been fruitful ; and, certainly, the plaintiff's case was thereby supported, since a. ruitful bed is the leading inducement to enter on. the cares of a married life. The plaintiff had also lost die hopes she justly entertained of being provided with how of her own. Nor was there arty disparity of yeses, or any fair objection to tr.e union of tiaese par ties: There was nothing objected to in the conduct of the lady. It was true, that in some instances, wrt. men had, in order to support their action in this cast, tendered themselves in marriage to the defendant, in order to lay a foundation for the action, a practice net commendable for its delicacy, nor was it necessary here ; for the defendant, by marrying another, had superseded all necessity of proof for the foundation of the action. The question was, what loss the plaintiff had sustained by being deprived of marriage with this defendant, such as he is—and what compensation she should have for her disappointment ? For that was the question for the consideration of the Jury ; and hi s Lordship was sure they would consider it properly,_.., Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages 1500. BIRTH. Tuesday se'nnight, in Upper Grosvenor-street, thel.ady Barrow, Esq. of the Admiralty, of a son. MARRIED. The Rev. R. Wright, Vicar of Wrar.g]e, Lincolnshire, to Miss Pennington, of Lamb's Conduit-street. At St. George's, Hanover-square, &ward Vernnn, F.cq. ef Dee-book, Cheshire, to Theodosia Frances, youngest daughter of the Rev. James Morrie, of Flower, NorthamptonsLiri:. Saturday, at Rochdale, Robert Blackburo, Esq. of Madeira, to Mary, daughter of the late Rev. Thorn 4 Bellas, A. M. Thursday last, the Rev: Giurge Illingworth, l'vrig s A. Smith, youngest daughter of Thomas Ashetcsa Smith, Esq. 0 ; Tedworth, Hants. • Rev. .1. Hartley, to Miss eonsitt, of York. Monday se'nnight, Joshua Cossack, to Mrs. Lots, widow both of Bury St, Edmund's. So anxious was the bride to evince het desire to " love, honour and that, in order to etLt e. rate her swain from all the- demands of unfeeling credi!c.ri, the absolutely crossed the highway in a state of perfect nud;:y, pre. viouc to her going to church. DIED. Yetterday, at his house in Park-place, St. James's, Thomas Godfrey, Esq. M. P. for Hythe. On Monday .e'nnight, at Clapton, aged 62, the Rev. Jaeger Symons', Rector A Whitburn, Durham, and many years MiLiter of Upper Clapton ChapeL On the 14th ult. after a severe and tedious illness, the Re*, Archibald Williamson, one of the Ministers or Chapel of EAU, Glasgow., in the 4.;th year of hii age, and 90111 of his ministry. Rev. N. Brown, Rector of Ingolthby, near Feikirgham, eolnshire, late Fellow of Christ's College, Cambridge. The Hon. Mrs. Eliot, wife of the Hun. Wm. Eliot, M. P. for Liskeard. In Camden Town, Mrs. l3yarn, the Lady of Edward Byara, Erq. President of hi.. Majesty Council, Antigua, At Madras, on the 15th of July, Commissioner Tumul i of the Royal Navy. He had landed only a few days from England. At Portsea, Lieutenant Richardson, formerly of the Ist‘reterut Battalion, aged 83 yews. Sunday se'nnigbt, Mr. Panetta*, a carpenter of the Royal Navy, who attained his 90th year ou New Year's Day last. At Lerwick, Dr. Duncan Campbell, Assistant Surgeon to the 6th Veteran Battalion. ett the 30th ult. suddenly, Sir Mali. Wiseman, Bart. aged at. Frit'aY, in the 9341 year of his ay, Charles tourchier, Esq. formerly Governor of Madrai. TO *MORROW. I Sun riles, I Sun sets, Moon rise', 10 minutes after 6 Lto minutes after fi 131 minutes after 14 HIGH WATER ATIONDON BRIDGE TO-MORROW. Morning.— ..... 20 minutes after 4 Afternoon .... 40 minutes after 4 NO Medicine is so well calculated, or has better succeeded in giving rellef.ha numerous bad Cases of Sere plaula, than SPILSBURY's PATENT ANTISCORBUTIO DROPS. A trial will prove this, and convince even the tattier andety of parents when the glands become first swelled and diseased, or the usual symptoms of scruphulous enlargement of the stomach in children takes place. In eruptive cases of Scurvy, Gout, Rheumatism, and Nervous Irritation of the Stomach front bilious affections, its superiority has long been acknowledged.— The genuine Medicine has the words, " By the King's Patent,* expressed on the bottle, bill of direction, and outside wrapper, and the King's duty, is printed in black ink. Sold at the Dispen sary, No. 15, Sohu-square, I.vndon, in small bottles of is. 60., double bottles ins. and larger 11.95. Compound &sew, to allay unpleasant irritation, B*. GRAVEL AND STONE. I_,TICIU‘IAN's PILLS for the GRAVEL and STQ,NE, aPs a certain cure for tkat most painful and dis tressing complaint the Stone and Gravel, in all its various forms, as lumbago, and excruciating pain it► the bowels. This disease known to proceed from a faulty secretion in the kidneys, con , netted with the weakness of their vessels.- The use of Hick man's Pills, by bracing these organs, restores the secretion of the urine to a h Altby state, and prevents the farther production of that platter which forms stone and gravrL It is from success in private practice, and at the strong recommendation of numbers who have been cured by them, that they are brought before the public, and experience will convince every one of their unparal leled efficacy against this fatal disorder. Sold whelesali• and retail at Nlr. Butler's, 4, Cheapside, cornet of Paternoster-mw;Tutt, Royil Exckange; Clark, , 269, Borough, Allen, 76, Oxford-street, and most Country Booksellers and Me dicine Venders, in Boxes at 21. 9d. each. Of whom may be haili Butler's Arothatic Pectoral Lozenge*. for improving the voice, and for Coughs, Colds, Asthma*, be. Boxes at I3id. each. IMPOWFANT DISCOVERY. THE Advantage the Public must always derive from regularly educated profession.dl men directing almost exclusively their StUdiei to one species of malady, was never more clearly demonstrated than by the unexampled success which has attended the administration of their new remedy, and the extraot , di:Lary cures it has performed. For a long series of years Messrs. Coital, and Co. Surgeons, formerly in his Maj..sty's service, have made the Venereal Disease the particular object of their ir.vesti gation, and are happy in having discovered a medicine superior to mercury, in the cure of that complaint ; it is sufficient to (*serve, that the effects of this remedy are diametrically opposite to those kattiorcury, for though it completely eradicates every vewitre of the virus, in its most confirmed stages, yet it does not in the least injure the constitution ; on the contrary, it renovates the system hi all its natural functions, p ro motes appetite, and facili tates di. gestion ; thus instead of reducing a strong and vigorous connitc doe to the frightful condition that mercury does, it not only P serves that dcrnstitution in its p r imitive state, but restores a weak and debilitated one to its natural strcr.gth and vigour. Nuniher• less instances are on recent record of th e superior efficacy of II•ie medicine, its inherent and specific virtues wing as a petPetu d corrective to bodily debility, whether proceeding from an thou execs of conjugal or illicit pleasure, or fro m the more uniclioas, /it not less destructive, indulgence of Incautious youtls of both 't in a certain pernicious hibit. Amidst the rnelanchoiy vane'` el disorders which are the consequen:e of this solitary vice, the :are none more afff:eting than that digressing state of debility af.ddr. ficiency which prevents or embitters th e matrimonial state; the unhappy sufferer broods over his misfortune, ashamed to seek re• lief, until he is reduced to such a state of weakness as to life oppressive. To such persons it must be a c onsobrig w `rte ( , tion to know, that they may now, by a n ew ll:Whine mode treatment, be r e stored to that greatest or ad buinanblessioga,t strong, manly and vigorous cotiscittition• In all Casts of debility, deficiency, from whatever cause arisird, well as In every species of venereal infection, Messrs. Clittde Le and Co. may be consulted by patients of (*fiber sex witk greatest secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. 107, Both! Garden. Patients in the country, describing the pal millet 7, their aomplaints, by letter post pa id, enclosing * Bark um ~11 tpr 7 i have the necessary medicine acts an advice sent to y pext kingdom. No. 107, Efutton-Gardsm LONDON Printed and published by F NT, n' s t terbury -Place, 1 .anibet at the STAT.-Orrice, No. ier street. Published alto at the STArt•Orelce,Temple