Star. — London, England, 1810-05-08 00:00:00

.~,-: . ~- . Sir W. CURTIS secooded.the motion. The Pe- .11* , present attended an Address voted , 1781, and neat subsequent Address in 1797. lithe year 1800 another Address . was voted to be {treated to the King on the Throne and, in consquence of an in struction to that elect , the Sheri ff* baited on his Ma jegy at Weymouth, to know when beWottitt be gra ciously pleased to receive it on his throne. The She-, riffs obtained his Majesty's permissioln ice the Clam - berlain to read to him their instruct:4s t but manila the same answer as in 1775, that hip Majesty, ever ready to receive the Addresses of his subjects, was the best judge where. Upon the representation of these ,circumstances bythe Sheriffs to the Common Hall, cer tain Resolutions were agreed to, which were commu nicated to the King at Windsor by the Sheriffs.'Thete I were all the cases that had occurred daring the pre sent reign until the latter end of last year, Wheir-thel . Pickens of London, had to complain of the -eldif maks of the jimes, and, the Livery of Louden at ;steroid. to address his Majesty on the grivrahosa , with which the nation was oppressed. This wooden.' :; a time when the public, and the Citizens of lacer-4' don in particular, were borne down by the burthen: of taxes, but more especially one grinding tax, row ti red doubly oppressive by the measures resorted to h r rendering it productive. It was the more neces s: ry for them to carry up their complaints of griev ances to the Throne, because they saw the measures resorted to in that House for their redress unavailing. Disgusted, therefore, with the losses .that had been sustained, provoked by the expences incurred, whilst no means were taken to bring public defaulters to ' • : stice ; mortified at the rebuke which his Majesty ,c 1 been advised unseasonably to give to the City of ondon ; disgusted at all these circumstances of no. tienal calamity and disgrace, the Livery of London required the Lord Mayor to call a Common Hall.. That. Hall was called, and a more numerous and re , spectable Meeting never. assembled in London. An! Address was voted to his Majesty, and the Lord . Mayor and Sheriffs directed to present it to his Majes ty, at a levee, waving their right to have it presented on the throne, in consequence of the state of his Ma jesty's health. On the 14th of December, they applied to the Secretary of State, and were informed by him they would aot be allowed to present it at a Levee, and on the 20th of the same month; when waiting on his Majesty with another Address, they were refused permission to present this Address at the same • time. The consequence was, that the Livery had . come to Resolutions similar to those voted in 1775. What he complained of was, not that the Address of the Livery hid not been received on the Throne, be . cause, as his fellow-citizens had waved their right on that head, he was not bound there to insist upon that for which they did not instruct him to contend for ; what he had to complain of was the obstruction given to presenting the pet.tion to his Majesty at his levee. . Having stated the case, he should conclude by moving " Thst the obstruction made by his Majesty's Minhters to the Addresses of the Lord Mayor, Aldermen, Common Council,and • , Livery of London, on the 14th of December last, Is an infringe '6l Went of the subject•to petition the Sovereign on all lawful oc- Onsions?' - • , *ion and Address in question had been agreed to at a Common-hall legally assembled; *and though there were things in it with which he could not concur, he thought his Majesty's Ministers acted improperly in not allowing it to be presented in the usual way. He • had great pleasure in seconding the-motion. . Sir CHASLE4 PRICE likewisesaid, that the Pe- I tition had been agreed to at a .Coinmen-hall legally • convened. What would have been: its fate if a fair hearing had been allowed to. all, fie would not pre tend to say—bit it had been carried through, and • therefore ought to have gone to the Throne with the usual facility. While he agreed, with his Honourable Colleague (Combe) so far, he could not concur in the censure which he bad passed on the conduct of Ministers. He,thougbt they deserved a great deal of praise for the,manner in which they had conducted their expedition. -.( Near, hear.)—They also deserved great deal of pram for the manner in which they had preserved the peace of the metropolis on a late occasion. He remembered the riots in 1780, and Moped he should. never - see any such He again . exhihition. hoped the Ministers would act with the same energy on other occasions. Sir JAMES SHAW observed, that it would chew but bad taste in Mm to go over the seine ground with iris colleagues, as they had so ably spoken to the sub ject. As a friend to the general right of the subjects to petition, he would support the motion. The meet ing was legally contenedr.there was a very numerous Ifali—many of the!? Liverymen, and the claim of presenting t heirststsous on the Throne hating been waved, he ha IY conceived that Ministers ought not to have re fused to the Livery the opportunity of presenting the Petitior a ;hp j.evow. Mr. Sectetity oxprerneil sonut unitize that his Hon. Friends bad readily green their pen cur• re..:e m this mono n, they were _Lue ft* !!!! Plr! ?IVO Of One' Thc Wilkes, who was then Mayor, that they would not be again received in the same manner. The time, wee similar to the resent. The City was in a fee• meat. Wilkes was in the zenith of his popularity.. He had not, as he afterwards said, "got the dews evaporated into ,a snug sinecure." He was not then " a volcano extinct," but in the fidl fore, of eruption. It was then found necessary to repress the demi kitgss o h f ad th r a e t ce ' ive y d tashewleelitteraseeth ose not the Ilth th o e f lrt ;47l 7. and he did not think it of sufficient importance to call a Hall till the 24th of June following. They then passed Resolutions similar to those which had been paned n December last, with instructions tb their Representatives to make 'formidable motions against Ministers. Yet not one word on that occasion was said in the Mouse by Wilkes, Sawbridge, and Oliver, the bouteenx (incendiaries) of that 'day; upon the rright of the Livery to present to the King 'out the `Throne. The fact eas of itself decisive. He defied bat Ministers acted from any disrespect to the Unary —who, when not under the controulbf artful lddhi duals, always deserved great respect. He theitriad a passage from Hatsell's Precedents, to shew that the House of Commons received the Petitions of the Li very' exactly as those of (alter persons in ordinary cases. He stated, that no Petition, he believedi had come en his office that had not been forwarded to his Majesty. They had refused the claims of the City of London, because a similar indulgence could not, if they had been gratified, be refused to others. He pledged himself, that all Petitions coming to his office should be forwarded. He oppoted the motion. Lord FOLKESTONE'said, that the Honourable Alderman had not contended for the right of peti tioning on the Throne, to which the whole of the Se cretary's observations applied, but complained that the Livery had been denied that access to his Ma jesty's person which the law held to he the inherent right of English subjects. This, he contended, was a general subject of complaint ; and lie adverted to a meeting of the County of Berks, where this obstruc tion was seriously complained of. Any subject bad, even at the commencement of the present reign, the right to gi* a petition into his Majesty's hand. In consequence of the unfortunate case of Margaret Ni cholson, a regulation was adopted, that petitions should only be presented at the Levee. Now this was done away, and nothing remained but transmis sion through the Office of the Secretary of State.— This was rather unsatisfactory, considering that the grievance most seriously complained of would often' , be the retaining of the person in office who was to transmit the petition. The Honourable Secretary said, he believed that the petitions sent to his Office had been transmitted. This belief of his was a coin. fortable assurance to those whose rights to petition his Majesty im person were considered as inherent...-. This mode affbrded them an admirable security for the transmission of their grievances to . the Royal ear ! There were, however, stories afloat about peo titions having been found in the pigeon holes of the Secretary of State's Office, unopened and unpresente ed. Another suspicious circumstance was thaz all Pe titions to the King were not published in the Gazette, though the complimentary Addresses in praise Ministers, &c. were sure to be there, with a comment that they had been most graciously received. But 'who saw there any petitions complaining of fruitless and ridiculous Expeditions, &c. ? He bad seen a let ter from the Right Honourable Secretary himself (to Major Cartwright probably), denying that he was' under any obligation to read such petitions to his M 4; jesty ; and thus were the people debarred from that access to the Sovereign which the law called theirin herein right. The Honourable Secretary bad com pared the present times with those of 1775. He (Lord Folkstone) had no doubt that posterity would regard the claims of the present day against the exer cise of undue power by the House, in the same light as the claims of these days were regarded by the peo ple of the present day. The resistance then made to the undue exercise of power has been sanctioned by the approbation of the present day, and so would the present resistance be sanctioned by the approbation Of posterity. Mr. Secretary DUNDAS said, that the objection to the mode of transmitting petitions through the Office of the Secretary of State seemed to be, that the Secretary was under no obligation to read them to the King. But supposing . they were presented at the Levee, what security could there be that they would be rea d They were in both cases given to his Majesty with other public papers to he peruseil at the time most convenient for him. The letter to which the Noble Lord alluded was addressed to Ma ki?' cartwright, who had requested an audience of his Majesty to state his opinions on public affairs—and this being reused, be reqnired wane security of the Secretary of hate that he wield teed his Address to the King. This was imposeible—the Secretary could eply send them with other papers. It never bad been Pie cPstoP4 19 NIA* 11 4 addreisnen au4 Petitions in , • • was, .ttstablished atgalpss ahewa that they had deviated codld not believe that were . disoontentecl with the • petitions through the me , when they considered , owing. know whether it was drat understand the question, or put.- .. unable to answer. The from the Treasury referred petitioning on the Throne, Friend had expressly waved. had wandered from the volcanos, and had even language for invective. This vital importance in itself, the manner in which it d*elt upon the highly improper manner in which to defend themselves by infirmities oftheirSovereign. House to believe that his perfectly competent to the important of duties, the giving • complaints of his subjects. I be the duty of the House But they knew that this therefore reprobate the Ministers resorted, founded upon what for had bc. considered as the most ights Englishmen, which would be nugatory without access to his Majesty's person. Even in the worst times—those of Charles the Second, &c. this access had not been refused. The most corrupt Ministers had no idea that it could be refused. How complete would have been their triumph if they had discovered the practice which had of late prevailed ! Tt was the right of the Livery of London, as it was of all other British. subjects, to have access to the Royal person, and it seas the refusal which was com `plameci of. -Petitions ought certainly always to be respectful arid decorous—whether to the Crown or Parhament (Hear, hear.) He understood that cheer, and in answer to it said, that he thought some late petitions were exactly the reverse of what the idea of a petition implied. There was in the tenor and even in the expression something that warranted the belief that other objects were in the contemplation of the framers than a mere complaint of grievances. But, on the other hand, the obstruction of petitions, pro perly so called, was a subversion of the fundamental law of the land. Upon a division the numbers were—For the motion 52—Against it 138—Majority 86. DUKE OF On the re-admission of strangers into the gallery, Mr. WHITBREAD was on his legs, speaking on the resolution for a grant of £7OOO per annum to the Duke of Brunswick, on the Consolidated Fund. It appeared to him that there were other funds upon which a suitable provision for this Prince might better be charged. He instanced the Droits of the Admi ralty, and the Ciyil List Pension. Mr. TIEREY did not see why it might not have been charged in the first instance, on the 4.1 per cent. duties, as the pension of £9OOO per annum to the Duke of Gloucester had been. He should like to know what could be spared from the Civil List, or what might be spared from the Droits of the Admi ralty to purchase such an annuity, without incum bering the Consolidated Fund ? He had also heard that the military. appointments of his Highness were from 3 to £5OOO a-year : he wished to know whether this report was correct? The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER replied, that his military appointments did not ex ceed £l5OO or iftl6oo a-year. As to the Droits of Admiralty, it was a floating fund, t poll which u per manent grant could not attach. Mr. TIERNEY explained. Mr. PONSONBY said, that when it was consider ed that the Duchess of Brunswick had already a pen sion of £lO,OOO a year charged on the Consolidated Fund, he thought that £7OOO annually was rather , too great a sum to vote the Duke. It appeared to him that, all circumstances being considered, £5OOO per annum would have been quite sufficient. He wished to know the situation of the amount of the Droits of Admiralty, and what could be spared from it. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER .said, that it was certainly by no means an exhausted fund, but he could not take upon himself to say what sums entild be spared from it. The ResolutiOn Was then put and agreed to. Mr. TIERNEY expressed a wish, that before the second reading of the Bill to be founded on this reso lution, the Chancellor of the Exchequer would be prepared to answer the questions which had been put to him. . • . . . . --- . - . ~.., / • ANA lit ' f A MAI - 2 . ' r ''. ii • ... . • 144441111 W A S ,flitil *am , . , . . ~ ; At ,4* ...ist4;_... ". .''- - • , ° .'' 1 6 1 •.' • • ' ihai t r4At ...' .'' ,- IP it *:'''." . ' 4,14 be s h e " tl , i . • f r ove , •' we Jo , 4.1‘ , - •r• .1.. • , •41 s ' i - Li .;; IL 1 .'.• . • Mkt" ll° I tZrillirbi r e" *rm . - ' '" 4. -51" -1 . 0 0 1 00 004..tw !gang" : , riling, Country. were =roe =Pr. '. . - ......c ' A.' , ' : of "adder), it . act - a& go far . '. • ' 4 ' 4 ' :- * t Mode of presenting peat difived. tho ' "no *Pe ' that case d conduct deserved, not an . '.l • ' .. Of the . &craw,' of Sty. osier so wafer* so 'do im - ' sisosis,, awe only ) , but a direct and positive hailsaifeite 'Causes to which this was ov ail V.,. ... 4. te'l Ili 4 1 104 .„„._.‘ . 4 ' . 'r v . , . uen. Beebe would •show, in a few Weeds; Oat . • Ift.,llbitNEß did not knot MI aid miens, ; asotllide • - - ' neehted • ' Isere wa s . no ground whatever . for lbe asotiou.. the Ministers did not nuclei:sum no Ma ingT Isoprow , ,:'-• soothes; A Vie gessoes(' was, whe th e!.the . Livery of London 'otiosely avoided it, from being ui dress._eases wa,a re .411 D thit -- Ili MS two Ad- had nigh &striven wboada noebeleh to other *Kick of the first Speaker from .. weaves had Vir ia l . ; „ is Ar il :hick had chums of the etannainity ? for it was not pretended solely - to the claim of petitior a l ' 'S t u ' . . ' been received his - . els his ' - i'_noother that btialstershad refused tothem what they grimed which MS Honourable Friend is Janet which sem was gilionsed.., 14 this hyper to others. no acknowledged that Ministers did ad- The Honourable Secretary hac Mtge the Chassbarlein we .folostsd. .14 letter from - vim his Majesty Act to grant the Livery more than real question to talk of his vol Lord Hertford.** it was ffti Millestjes pleasure not was allowed to his other subjects. The Honourable resorted to a, foreign langu a ge to receive any Address ppois his throw froos.thicity .1114erntan had correctly stated, that there were di -question was of the most vital of Londonbso in its COrpOrle• .Chal*Cilf. This SOW' anodes of presenting petitions, Ist, to the sing upon and still more important from ti inunicadOn was than submitted to a Dominos Haft, the Throne, when alone an seem was returned ; bad been received. He then d at *high certain Tesoll3dollll Illeft : ntelle thdaraterY 2d, At the Levee, whin the 'lion was given to indecorous, indelicate, and imp of the tight of the city of London to their pe- ,his Majesty,. who i 'handed it to the the Ministers endeavoured to I titions, or addresses, to the Leg on des and. Lied in W . - ; then the public Levees htvint drawing the veil from the infirm to have as answer to diem - Asettheressolotio; was been di ' * - mein to th e defect of his Majei; It was impossible for the How also pawed, containing atteaprees Ns' nction to the ti's sight, the - 8d Modelllell i jkit of tremositting pe. Majesty was not in a state perfe Sic sot to present the Adiresf.isst to tho. Fog .tatiens throokh the Mai the Secretary: or State. discharge of that most importar as hie Theme.. The Sheri& . . wailed upon This *tightens of -41Waii had an opportunity of a proper attention to the corn/ . : ft Ma' on a Levee day, sosse that skin in coseatos wft tis Weer: caber subjects. If it were otherwise, it would be AM 4. _4. voculd be received at 1(1404 I but -:This was smedin first time the Livery had made to order an investigation. Bu sip darter t . ow, his. hirjeiry informed. Pretensions to superior rights. 'At no ptriod ptaviouti was not necessary, and must t cam thee , 4* be at all Oates ready to to the year 1770 were their *titian received oUtise anode of defence to which Seceive eit petitions of his people, and . that he Throne. From 1770 . 161773, three of foss Petitions The claim of the Livery was fi -' was the best judge where. No Address was, were thus received. In the hitter year this was found a century and 'a half had been I therefore, presented on that occasion. ' The same so inconvenient, that the Chamberlain wrote to Mr. invaluable rights of Englishm fate attended an Address voted iii 1781, and the Wilkes, who was then Mayor, that they would not euratory without access to his ii NAVY ESTISIATIGS. Upon the question for the House resolving itself , into a Committee of Supply upon the Navy Estimates,. Mr. }IUSKISSON expressed a hope that the House would not, at so late an hour (it was about half. past eleven) proceed to the. consideration of a question of such importance, and to which there Would probably be many objections. He bad moved on Friday last for several documents, which appeared to him highly important in the consideration of these Estimates it and although the papers he moved for were printed, they had not been distributed until late this evening, and ho himself had not had time to con sider them with that attention that it was necessary to give them. He had no objection to go into the Committee pro forma; but he could not make up his mind to vote away so much money without farther information. The CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUER agreed that the subject was of great importance. The plan to substitute men of war in the place of hired transports, for the conveyance oftroops, was full qf &faculty. He could assure the Hoe. Gentleman it was not lost sight of, and was even now in a certain degree of progress. He had no objection to postpone that part of the TSSri. mates which related to the Transport Service. After a conversation of some length, in which Messrs. Tsai- NET, HUSRISSON, the CHANCELLOR of the EXCHEQUZR, Sir C. POLE ' Mr. ROSE, Mr. R. WAR D , and Mr. CALCIIIAIT, took a part, the order for goiug into the Committee of Supply, weie de ferred until Wedneoduy. IRISH FLAX 1/LL I The order of the day for the amend readies of the Isiah Plea Bill having been read, • Sir J. NEWPORT wort*, that it be reed a mood tine that 0 47 threeinoepu. On a dividon, dpre being only 14 Me ben ?melt; Ihe ad i G uno at Hal4aat () he! • THE EVENING LONDON. TUESDAY, MAX plum OF STOCKS THIS DAY AT S per C. dons money, 701-4ce. Red. 69f-4 per Cent. 1140-5 per Cent. Ent. Ms, 7s. to 14e. preen.—Bands, r Lord GRIM' last night, gave notice respecting the State of the Nation, tent part of which will, of course, nal affairs. We are relieved from saying anything farther upon this subject, ness of his Lor dsh ip's speech, to which - fore orly refer our Readers. Lord ERSKINE'S speech, likewise ' which his past service► for the liberty mid of the press, give him so great with respect, will also be read with In the House of Commons, the the House of the near approach of necessity of adopting some measures, die proceeding of Sir FRANCIS Be: ier will be best elucidated by a reference Suncntary Report itself. Mr. Alderman COOMBE brought last night relative to the right, of don to present their petitions to I which was lost by a majority of I Accounts were yesterday received terranean, which induce a belief that is destined for an expedition against At a late hour last night we recei , to the 3d instant. The Monitewr presents a series of reflections on dition, and many sneers at the by oar nnisters respecting the fot 'fications bats of Antwerp, &c. &c.—We . give credit to the account it presents and description of troops then in Scheldt. These papers state, that the . commenced. Fresh Generals (M BRUN, and DOKszsuE) I ,:tAening into different parts of the Peninsula. We doubted, yesterday, the authenticity for carrying off FERDINAND VII, - his confinement, particularly what attributed to our Government in The reasons we adduced for our to us convincing; but it would passed last night in the House question put by Mr. WHITBREAD of the EXCHEQUER, that our Government itself to be duped by some agent French Government !—To us it countable how Ministers should selves to be thus imposed upon. first instance of the kind, some excuse for them ; but we recollect two before. did succeed, but the other was averted cious prudence of Mr. Fox.—W, the present attempt on account of exposed. As to its being " a horrid plot," as stated by the French, we shall that no comparison can be made between a captive Prince from the hands mailing a whole Royal Family I Yesterday a Leeward Islsnd Nocton packet, Captain MARTI-IRV Thomas on the 27th of March. does and Trinidad was inactive, it was more brisk. PLYMOUTH, MA Last evening the DREADNOU hirbour to be docked.—No arri\ a cartel brig, with 80 invalid Morldix—to bring back an equal . PORTSMOUTH, MA 'Atrived the HARDY gun 7 brig Sailed the CHRERLY, with a convoy The PHOENIX, for the East Indies, but will bring up to night at St. 7 diamen still remain at pitlfead, _ tinues fair they will follow 0-morrow DEAL, MAY Put back by contrary winds, STANDARD.—Wind N.E. blows FROM LLOYD'S LIST. GRAVESEND, MAY 7.—No a:dvals. Sailed for Dominica; and tht Union packet, Tyrrell, NEWMARKET FIRST SPRING MEETING, Mr Bouverig's Discount, Bst. both. beat Trump, Sst. Ab. M. 100 gs. is. R...-11 to ' Sweepstakes of AY)gs. each, b. ft, Duke of Grithon's c. by Waxy, out of Scotia Lord Darlirgtou's c. by Eagle, mat of Flighty' 3 to I on Duke of Grafton. Mr. Sbakespear's Sir David, Bst. 71b. Vandyke, Ss.. First 3 Miles of If. C. 200 gs. on Sir David. Sweepstakes of 25gs. each, for 2-yr. olds, . 41b. Two•yr. old Course Mr. Vansittart's b. c: Glo.ter l 'by Cheshire ' Mr. Wilcoo's Cambric - - Lord Grosvenor's Jubilee - Sto i agst. Cambric-7 to 4 Sweepstakes of 100 gs. each, b. ft. for colts . old, and not named in the Derby, Oak., colts Bst. 61b. fillies Bst. 81b. D. M. Mr. Vansittart's gr. c. brother to Burleigh Mr. Ladbroke's c. Mr. Edward, by Eagle Duke of Grafton's f. Fairing, by Waxy 5 to 4 on Mr. Vansittart-4 to Mr. Ladbrokes Mr. Edward, beat Lord Bst. 51b. each. Two-jr. old C. 100gss—Even Edwird. Lord Wilton's BenvoUo, brothtr to Burifhales, Loid &men Invalid, Bst. fib. It. Benvollo. Mr. Vanduart's Burnish, beat Mr. each. B. C. 9110p.--Even betting on Burleigh. Ld G. H. Caiendisb's Bramble, 7st. 11Th. ton's Musician, 9st. Sib. T. M. M. 100gs.-5 Lord F. G. Osborne's Poppy, 7st. 14Th. Thorn, Sot. tolb. Two•yr. old Course, b. f Sweepstalvs of 100 gs. each, b. ft. Major Wilson's Juniper, BALM. Mr. Fatties Sunbeam, est. 7lb. Ld Oxford's Poulton, est. 76. - Seven to 4 on Juniper-11 to BoLath—To day them Wag ao Mayor, otter inspect* the awash oadavit present prise. )-* We arteltisheilitel 6 ounitodect , of Liniment Feler, of * Majesty's Lifter*, which Me 911014100 the Sr, Peme.—lto fen imilise in taken ph ad and published by LEVEL . Lambeth, at the Sissa-Orrae, O*P ai STOCIIT 'Tag* n S otioB. I t r 4.ce A oo : t . . e i r i a ads, 1404 teas. pr e . on, the mote ultpet. e, relate to its inter om the necessity or sabject,by the cl eat . vhich we shall th en . ire, upon 1 topic on berry of the subject at a title to be he. n d h peculiar interest. SPEA lcast rClnir.ded of Term, and cf the nes, in order. to met ultitETT. Mat. eterence to the Par- a forward Lis ir.t.Liw the Livery of Lc:. the King i n p enal.. 138 to 52. ived from the Medi- that the Toulon flee. jut Sicily. eceived Paris Pape::: Ir of the Ist of Ma) • the Scheldt Expe. ignorance exhibitor srtifications mad at;c-- cannot, however , :lents of the numbet- it the vicinity of the siege of Cadiz has MACIDON A LI), MlNT- tening from Frau ula. ithenticity of the plot I. from the place of at respected the par: that transaction.— ' scepticism appeared d appear from what of Commons, on 4 ) to the CHANCLILOR. rernment has suffered rut in the pay of the : does appear unac- have suffered them- . Had this been the muse might be found before. One of them verted by the sospi-- ire cannot but regret if the weakness it torrid and atrocious we shall only remark between carrying off i of his enemies, and Mail arrived by the sv, which left Saint The trade of Barba. but at Guadaloupe AY 6. uonr, 98, came up ivals to-day.—Sailed French prisoners, for 1 number of ours. tAY 7. from a cruise.— voy for Plymouth.— ies, is under weigh, r. Helen's. The In- but if the wind con- Drrow morning. 7, his Majesty's ship strong. LIST. Sailed the Pilgrim, HCV, Tyrrell, for FLiyti. MEETINg, MAY 7. beat Lord F. &WWI is 1 MA. DiSCQUIIt. Bat. 41b. Ab. M. loath! 1 's dam - it ighty ;ratton. beat Duke of Grafton** 00p. h. it.—Eren benirg a, colts ast. 71b• fillies list. ,ourse. I hire Cheer - - I apt. Jubilee. dts and fillies dant 31 " . )sks, or 9000 gs. Stake ; t . 1 . 2 1k . s a I apt. Fairing. ad Kinnaird's Don Jul% ,--Even besting tat' • 4 - Encephala', Sit lib. bat b0 0 g5 ....7 to 4 on Wilson's Verb, SC 711) . 111 b. beat Lard Dolor 1 a '-5 hfu sil . b ft .. , l2itet t . . s ;Pd aSst. mg r aist ..Aodre wargiabir• parry• .• $ . - o it an Roam irotAidersto die 144 ordered it to centime at 417 -" arekg• isement fiat. sidp NetsiNg o tw als STAR,' treat LEVEL KENT, ma y, ▪ Arrioz, N 0.14 4/2C51 Tani& pa!