Star. — London, England, 1810-01-09 00:00:00

and of a military authority , of which that of the Commander in Chief hientelf, and of the whole army, is made stilmrdinattlty an act Of...the-British Legis /ature—an authority to which they owe implicit obi. dience ; and which must, at the very least have been felt to challenge sufficient respect to exempt an ,indi: t vidual docer from the impu nof a criniefer has. ing askii conformable to it. . . 66;: the reprimand to Lieutenant-Colonel Munro,. therefore, was not only not necessary ; but it •.vras unjust, and inconsistent with "the principle which Lieutenant-General Macdowall had himself pro felted. 67. For these reasons, we consider the shape given to the General Order of the 28th January as. merely colourable ; and we are of opinion that the reprimand of Lieutenant-Colonel Munro was evidently intended only as a vehicle for circulating throughout the army serving under the Government of Fort St. George a vehement and intemperate public censure of that Go vernment, and an inflammatory address to the pro fessional feelings of that army, on topics thought likely to produce irritation and disorder. It was, in cher words, a most seditious paper, under the title of General Order to the Army, and bearing the thin disguise of a reprimand to a particular officer. 68. That this attempt to excite irritation and to I produce disorderly conduct among the officers of the army, has not been entirely unsuccessful, we lament the necessity of acknowledging ; and that those de signs have nevertheless been substantially frustrated, and have fade' in for the greater part, we have a cordial s. tisfaction in ascribing, first, to the good sense of the army at large, which could not be mis led by fidlacies so easily detected ;but next and prin cipally to the firm attachment to the duties of their profession, and to that steady loyalty and incorrup sible fidelity, which, in that army, we are confident, will ever be found proof against the arts and seduc tions of faction. G 9. Notwithstanding the sentiments we have ex pressed concerning the, true nature and tendency of the General Order in question, we have not neglected to consider whether the officers who gave it currency, by the order of the Commander in Chief, were re sponsible for its criminal purport, and were, on that account, justly removed from their offices. 70. In deliberating upon this question, we resorted nairrally to such general principles applicable to the subject, as we thought best established, and most free from doubt. 71. The following propositions have appeared to us of that description : First—That, as a general principle, a military offi cer is not only justified in obeying an e.rder of his su perior, but that he is bound to do so without regard to the quality of the order. Under this head we con sider the Adjutant-General as obliged, in a peculiar manner, by the duties of his office, to publish to the army any orders which the Commander in Chief may commit to him for that purpose. We are clearly of opinion, as a general principle, that the Adjutant. General is not bound to deliberate on the propriety dif the order which he is commanded to issue ; that it would be a breach of military duty to do so ; that he is merely ministerial in these functions, and is not responsible, personally, for the propriety or impro. priety of the orders he may circulate officially to the army. 72. We regard these principles as very invasions. and, in a manner, fundamental in the theory of OM. tary subordination. Secondly—We consider, however, as not less esta blished, that the general principle above stated is sub ject to exception and modification. The modification by which the general principle of simple obedience ought to be limited, is, in our judgment, the follow. ing :—that criminal orders are not to be obeyed ; and that the officer who executes a criminal order of his' superior is personally.respontiblefor his conduct. We look upon this modification of the general military • principle as forming itself a great and primitive prin ciple, not less important anti fundamental for the civil security of society, than we allow the other maxim of implicit obedience to be for the due support of mili tary subordination. 73. Considering then, as we have already stated, the General Order of the 28th of January as a seditious paper, we might at once pronounce the Adjutant and Deputy Adjutant General guilty of sedition, by the publication of that order, notwithstanding the autho rity under uhich they acted. 74. But that judgment would not be justified by the mere criminality of the order which they issued ; and it is necessary, in order to establish their partici pation in the crime, and to render them personally responsible, to chew that they were acquainted with the seditious character of the paper. 75. In forming our judgment upon the point, we }lave not considered it as an abitract question, but as `fit to be combined with all the circumstances of the case, and especially with those in which the parties concerned were placed ; and from this view of the question it has, in our opinion, resulted, that Colo nel Capper and Major Boles are to be considered as partaking personally in thii act of Lieutenant-Gene ral Macdowall, and as deeply responsible for its per uicious and criminal tendency. 6. Before this order was prepared, it was not only knohn to those two confidential staff-officers of the Commander in Chief, but it was notorious to the whole army and settlement, that these was a warm and vehement dissention between the Commander in Chief and the Government. These officers were ac qnainted with the prosecution of Lieutenant-Colonel Munro, and the part which Lieutenant-General Mac dowall had taken in that proceeding. They knew that every step in that extraordinary transaction was a studied insult to the Government. They koew that Lieutenant-General Matdovrall had become the patron-and channel of a Memorial to the Court of Directors, highly disapproved by the President in Council 4;f Fort St. George, which he had himself, at the instance of that Government, and at no dis- tant period, written circular letters to discourage and suppress, but which, in a riper stage of hostility to wards the person and authority of the Governor, he had countenanced and promoted. It is, in fine, e'iperfluous to prove what is beyond doubt, and is not denied, that a wain imisionate rupture . had broken • •,tit between thessitwo high whorities. . 11 ‘? dm ! I IPP I N I/111P Pr in g isocstd inflict a sevasie punishtnen op Lipureaant-tx- ibnel Munro, for.karingactedon a different opinion ; but one which has beea supported by,thejadgment of the Government, that is to 4%ty,. Ai an authority -a* r • • . . . open and ardent oPposition to thaboverament lohlth he serves, is no trivial evept, andOoludtonn ap = of things from which sue,ecalmmaimeng now . to this question, have appeapEdto us to ..e. • 78. We considerthiweircuinstanees• therefore) kit furnishing a new modfratiots of- themilitary prim. ple first asserted.- and we are of opinion; that in such extraordinary and momentous ies, it is . fit and necessary to require, that whose duty 'it is togive compel to the orders of the Commander in Chief, shoqld, contrary to the general principle of blind obedience which ought to prevail in ordinary txtnes, carefully consider these orders,, and deliberate .seriously upon their nature and purview, before he publishes them. The circulation, in heated noil.bc tious times , of a seditious address ' to `the army, Ikas no analogy to the principle of military obedience to a military order in the common dispateirof business, and cannot be governed by the same fules. 79. We are after much and serious reflection, de cidedly of opin ion, that this restriction of the military principle, the general importance of which we never theless feel most sensibly, cannot impair the obliga. tions of military subordination and obedience; in may manner qe. degree, prejudicial to the natural and legi timate Objects of military command ; and that in times of trouble,. it may afford a most salutary and necessary reflection to the Government and people, against the possible perversion"of military supremacy , to the purposes' of sedition or faction. 80. In a natural and' wholesonte stated things the obedience of subordinate, Officeri is 'to be implicit ; admitting of no deliberation and subject to no respon sibility, except foi plain and manifest crimes. In such distempered seasons of open contention' with Governments as are now in question, addresses from j Commanders in Chief to their armies, having refer ence I ence to such.debates, area fit subject of deliberation I to those whose office it may be to transmit them, and a responsibility belonging exclusively to such ocelo t sions, must attach even to their official and ministe lrial acts. 81. In conformity with these sentiments, we have , no dqubt of the responsibility of the late Adjutant and Deputy Adjutant-General of your army, on the occasion of publishing the General Order of the 28th January • and we are of opinion, that if the author of I that Order is himself guilty of sedition, as we esteem him to be, these confidential officers of the staff, who consented to be the instruments of hiscrime, are under I all the circumstances implicated in the guilt and sub , ject to the penalties of the offence. I 82. If there were doubt, however, upon this ques tion, which, as weighing general and fundamental principles against particular modifications of them, j must always be a delicate one, we cannot quit the I subject without repeating, that it is not a fit mater ' for the interference of the army itself. In what par-1 I ticttlars seditions may consist ; under what circum-' • stances the official instrumentality of an efficerin the crime of a superior shall subject him to personal res ponsibility, are questions to be discussed in colder I blood, and by a different description of counsellors, than are always to be found in numerous bodies at a I I period of beat and irritation. They are worthy of the informed and impartial deliberation of lals Ma jesty's confidential Servants and Advisers, and of the Supreme Rulers of the army of India, the honourable the Court of Directors. 83. To snatch a question of that nature and im-, portance from the decision of those authorities, at the very moment of its formal reference to their judg ment, and to cast it as .a source of discordant violence into the midst of an army already warmly agitated, is the part of incendiaries and not of friends, either to the army or the state. It is a great Crime, and being that of which the officers who have lately ex perienced the marks of your displeasure have appear ed to you on a careful investigation of the facts to have been guilty, we have no hesisation, although we deeply lament the occasion of this necessary seve rity, in approving and commending the vigilant energy with which you have in a season of great dif ficulty and danger asserted the legal authority ob your Government, prevented the factious contagion from spreading through the honourable and hitherto untainted ranks of the Coast Army, and provided for the security and integrity of the British Empire in India. 81. You will perceive that much of what has been said on the Memorial, is applicable to the address to Major Boles. 83. This is also a measure connected with. a mili tary combination. It assumes the cognizance of a question which belongs to fitter and higher tribunals. It pronounces, in the name of an army, open cen sure of the Government, which the army is bound to obey. 86. In these respects it stands on the same footing and partakes in all the criminality of the paper we have already considered. But there is in the address to Major Boles, a character of transcendent guilt and danger, which is peculiar to itself,. We allude to the scheme, of which it professes to lay the foun dation, of a combination of private power to contest with the power of Government ; organized resources of resistance, mutual support against the hand of justice; and indemnity against the legal consequence of crimes. 87. We do not know how it is possible to approach much nearer that extreme crisis, which he so emphati eally menaced in the Memorial, without reaching it. We trust, however, confidently, that those who have been improvidently betrayed into those desperate courses, will have been awakened to a sense of their perilous situation ; and that by arresting the progress of the foremost, you will have saved their inconside rate followers from the ruin and dishonour to which their leaders were conducting them. 88. With regard to those who have taken a leading part in these criminal transactions, we feel that every principle of tried and established policy, applicable to such conjunctures, and every obligation of your sacred trust, forbad the extension towards them of a false and mischievous lenity. 89. We concur also entirely in the sentiment ex-' pressed in your General Orders of the Ist ultimo; that it is not sufficient for officers holding commands to avoid a participation in such proceedings, but that it is their positive and indispensable duty to adopt the moat decided measures for their suppression, and to report them to the superior authorities. The pur poses of tumult and sedition may as effectually be promoted by their negative concurrence- as by their !agile participa4en. Oats lacer who, aPprlzeditaiirogress of disoiderly 'pro ettecrtngs among those who are placed . under his im mediate eeetroul, abstains from any attempt to sap leas them, either by the exertion of his own authority, -cif by an appeal to the superior power, gives-to those proceedings one mode of encouragement, and cannot stand absolved of blame, nor found a claim to munity, much less to 'a continuance of that implicit confidence, which is attached to stations of authority, on the basis of so culpable and mischievous a neu trality. 91. From the whole of the preceding discussion, you will naturally infer that we consider the offences charged against those officers whom you have judged ir necessary to suspend or to deprive of their appoint-. ments and commands, fully justifying the respective degrees of punishment which you have allotted to ' them. 92. The local means and advantages which you L7:7Bas well as the great delicacy of the enquiry, :ecessarily placed the application of these prin ciples to individeals, and the investigation of particu lar cases, under your exclusive cognizance; and we have only to express that entire confidence which is due to your station and characters, in the justice and impartiality set less than in the violence and activity of your proceedings, in a scrutiny so peculiarly cir cumstanced. 91 We observed with satisfaction that the general tenor of the replies to the Circular Letter addressed byMajoe.General Gowdie to the Officers commanding at the siveral stations of the army, confirms the opi nion which we have expressed of the loyalty of the major part of the Officers of your establishment. 94. In assuring you, therefore, of the firm support of this Government, in maintaining a contest which inv'tilves all that is most dear to our Sovereign and country, if, contrary to our ardent desire and san guine hope, any future call should yet be made ill the power and energy of your Government which may require our aid ; we will conclude, however, with expressing our fondest wish and expectation, that the late afflicting agitations should subside in a calm and reasonable reliance on the wisdom and justide of the high atiurities to which the transactions of ell, troubled period have been advocated, and in those de monstrations of respect and obedieuce, which are due not more to your station, than to the faithful and ho nourable discharge of all your public but difficult du ties, which, in our opinion, has eminently distinguished the present Government of Fort St. George. 95. Such a result will be most acceptable to ns, most accordant with our views of d^ public interest, and most congenial with those sentiments of affection and respect towards the Army of the Coast which we cordially profess, and remain assured that we shall never have reason to renounce. We have the honour to be, honoured Sir, your most obedient humble ser vants, MINT°, Ikon William, May 27, 1809. J. LUMSDE?J. A n n edi tos Copy, H. COLEBROOK!. A Fm.coNAlt, Chief Sec. to Uovernmeut. LONDON MARKET'S. RETURN of WHEAT in Mark-lane, including only from the SiSth of December to the 30th of Dec. Total 7,010 quarters Mange 995. 3ld. higher than last rearun. A RETURN OF FLOUR, From the 23d of December to the 29th of December. Total 14,856 sacks—Average 945. bid. 04 Id, higher than last return. FROM THE LONDON GAZETTE, January 6. Mirage Price of Corn in England and Wales from the returns ending the 80th of December, 180'. Wheat. Rye. Barley. Beans. Pease. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. s. d. I I 102 4 53 11 I 50 8 57 0 sti 11 The average Price of Sugar, computed from the returns made in the week ending the 3d day 01 J.Lnuary. is 50s. 9id. per cwt. INSPEGIOR'S Re:TURN 4f UXBRIDGL, Jau. 4. Wheat per load 11 , 21. Os. to SOL Os. Barley,per quartet 345. --d. to 48s. —d. Oats 24a. —4l. to 40s. —d. Beans 455. —(l.. to 645. —d. Peas 545. -d. to 5Ss. —d PRICES OF HAY AND STRAW. ST. JAMES'S. WMITECUA Hay 41. 104. to G 3. 10s. Hay 41. les. to 61. Os Straw 21. 2s. to 21. 17s Cloves• 61. 104. to 71. is Straw 21. 4i. to tn. 10$ PRICE OF HAY AND STRAW IN SMITHFIELD. Meadow Hay 31. Os. to 61. Os. Clover 61. Os to 71. lOs New ditto 01. 00s. to 01. ow. Rowin. 21. 101 to 41. Us Straw 11. 105. to 21. ss. PRICE OF HOPS IN THE BOROUGH MARKET. SAG,. • POCK! rs. Kent 41. 10s. to 61. Os. Kent 41. 15s. to 71. Os. Susses Si. 10s. to 41. los. Susses 41. Os. to 51. Os SMITHFIELD MARKET, January 11. To sink the Offal per stone of 81b. Beef 4s. 4d. to 6s. 4d. Veal 4s. &t. to 6s. 8d Matto* ss. 41 to 6s. 6d. Pork 6s. Od. to 7s. 441 MEAD Or CATTLE 11113 DAT. Beasts, about 2300-Sheep and Lambs, 17,500. Calves, '230-Pigs. 350. NEWGAfE AND LEADENHALL MARKET. Perstone of elb.by the carcase. Beef 3s. ed. to 58. Od. Veal 4s. 4d. to ds. 4a Mutton 4i. ea. to 58. 4d. Pork es. Od. to 7s. 4d Lamb Skins, Os. Od. to Os. Od.-Sheep Skins, Ss. ed. to 6s. Od. PRICE OF LEATHER IN I.E.A.DENHALL MARKET. Butts 21d. 234 d. Calf Skins 345. 'Ms Ditto 23d. 24d. Ditto ' 348.395 Merchants' Backs 190. 200. Ditto 86s. 326 Dressing Hides 16d. 19d. Small Seals 3s. Od. is. 3d Fine Coach Hides led. 200. I.arge ditto tuos. 130 s. Crop Hides for curt. 1944. 1 ed. Tanned Horse Hides 19d tofd Ditto 175 d. 193 d. Goat Skins Ms. Ous RAW HIDES. Best Heifers and Steers (per I Ordinary 2.5. 6d. to Os. ed. stone) 38. Od. to 33. 2d. Market Ca lf 141 . Od. each. Middlings 2s. 4d. to 2s. 3 1 1. English Horse 14s. to les. ed COAL MARKET', January It. Ships at Market Ships sold Price 714 Neu/castle Coals 3c.3t 575. Od. to 675. 6d. 1 Sunderland 1 563. 6d. to 003. Od. 2 St. David's Cool o J,. 0.1. 1 Scotch Cad - 1 4.94. 04. to 00s. • , 1 Cinders 1 418. Id. COUNTRY MARKETS. ▪ PRIVCS Or GRAIN AT THE FOLLOWING MARKETS. Bssumostose.--Wheat 80s0d to 118 s Cd per Quartet. Barley . 39s Cd to 50s Od I Bipns 522 Od to 6 7s Od Oats 27s ed to 364 Od Prase 00s Od to 00s cd Bread 2s 4d. per gallon. lirxt.st.—Wheat Ses Od to 1241 Od per Qr. Barley 33s Od to 541 6d I Beans 54s od to 66s Od Oats 28s Od to 38s od Pease 60s Od to 63* Od Bread. 2s. 6d. per gallon MAIMS riazAD.—Whnt 86s Od to 118 s Od per. Qr. 38a Od to 49s od I Beans 45s Od to 6AOd 90s ed to 44s Od Pease 55s Od to 583 Od Bread 2s. 6d. per gallon. Navrauar.,--V7beat 94s od to 122 s Od per. Qr. Barley 94s od to 50s Od 1 Pease 34s Od to 58s Od Oats 25s Od to 38s Ad Beaus 50$ od to 65s Od 8read...... ..... ...2s 44 par gallon. READING.-Wheat oos Od to 125* Od per Quarter. Barley iles 6d to 5.5 s 6dilleans 470 Od to 644 Od Oats Ills Od to Sts eld Pease 52s 6d to 554 6d Bread 2s. Td. per pant. tai 3,-4 a ner n i geluin. oL—Barley 15s. 94.—Oats Ms. 01 Lysilliaasßest old Wheat 265. flell 6 4 13 .--BaTIPt I Is, C t , Sr. AUSTELS;SCed W Mai 37s.—Best Bread stib.—Se.o.ril 6d.—Beef prime 71d.—Mutton 7d.—Veil Sss..—fted 34s.—Barley 16s. Od.—Oats 9s. lid. PaNZA NC/rata Wheat 375. red sss. B arley 15s. o ats 91 Coals 161 Best Beef and Mutton 61 to 71 Veal 6tl. Pork s l to 51. 1 . Goose 61d. Butter 16d. CAMELIORD.--WhCat 395. BUILT l6s. Mel 7d. Mutton €l4 . Butter ISd. At Wakefield, en the Ist inst. Captain Barker, of the D on't Militia, to Miss Hill, of St. Joit's Place. Same day, at liuckland, near Dover, William second son o f Hussey Fleet, Esq. of Darenth, Kent, to Ann .1..1et,t daughter oi Thomas Horn, Esq. of Buckland, la the sant county. DIED. At Cambridge, on the 30th ult. in the 20th year of his age, et a typhus fever, Mr. J. W. Woods, of St. John'b College, s on John Woods, Esq. of Chilgrove, Sussex. _ • TO MORROW. Sun rises, Sun sets, Moon sets, 511 minutes after 7 I minutes alter 4 144 minutes after Is HIGH WATER AT LONDON I3RIDGE TO-MORROi: M0rning............ Afternoon ..... 3; minutes after 5 TO JOURNEYMEN BRUSH MAKERS. FROM SO to 10 Wo:-kmen, who are ind e p en d ent of the Club, may meet every encouragement, end cnis. avant employment in the city of Bristol, where five gviti r s, l4 .,. Man, and all travelling expellees will be raid upon arr;":4;, sides the benefit of the Apprentices. The wages have this e .ty been advanced, and arzlI(WV nearly equal to tilae hi London A letter addressed to Mr. William Chapman, Brioul, mete with innneiliate atllention. _ DR. S (VODEL1)0(.: Is far superior to all otlizr - externAl app stations the Cure of Sprains, Bruises, Rheumatirns, ;a3 al.o J r , Cramps or Numbness, and in promoting Circula7 ion is the UK, Innen in a paralytic state. It is the lies; Ren;edy for CLilblain., if dissolved in a spoon, and applied warm, or Wl!h a pledgrt lint well nio!reile4 with it, and tied on the part atfec:ed. It 1 4 likewise of admirable service in :he accidents and local to which Horses arc subject. Sold only by F. Nessbery and Song, No. 4S Sr. Paul's Chur c h. yard (four doors from the corner of Cheapside), London, pike 2s. 6d. is bottle, duty included ; but none are genuine but t:twe which have the words, " F. Newbery, No. 4.5, St. Paul's," 4 c. graved in the Etamp. Also, by their appointmenti by Bacon and Co. Oxf'o!d. street; Hawkins, Old Bond...street ; Hayward, Plemdiily ;.Ezy. ley and Co. Cockspur•strtet ; Barry, Westminster; born; Harris, Ludgate-itreet ; Randall, Royal Exeliange; aid Clarice, Borough. CORDIAL BALM OF GILEAD. Extract of a Letter from Mr. tomph Morris, Chepstow, ;op t SOLOMON, Gilead Ht us!, near Liverpool. Sri, Chepstow, October 5,160 THANT Eto inform yon of the followin caie, curd by your Cordial Balm of Gilead : Mr. I.ewloWiliiiani, painter and glazier, of the town of Brecon, in the county of Tirecon, was for a very long time labouring under An extreme Ifwvat , s ofrpni!s, so much so that he was obliged to negle -t a great part ollii,shie.:.e4 —he went to Swansea, think:ng batld :g would be of to en 4 .ce re him—but to his great concern he fou id no relief. lie afterwarla came to Chepstow, his native place, where his mother and friends now live—he complained to me how ill he Was, and appeared much dejected, saying, he thought he never should be well any more. I advised him to take your Cordial Balm of Gilead; bs bought of me a 51. case, and his brother assured me a fr.v days agathat he is now as well as ever he knew him, being folly sa tisfied that it was the 11: - Im of Gilead only that had restored bira to his usual health and spirits. I am, sir,your humble servant, JOSEPH MORRIS. To Dr. Solomon, Gilead House, near Liverpool. St it Edinburgh, Nov. 29, 1916. Although a very young matt;l was reduced to suck a state of debility, in consequence of at pervona.coeiplalnt;as scarcely to . be able to walk, and totally unabitero . fellow my usual empioymet had many other disagreeable symptoms, particularly a violent pain in the stomach, with a great depression and lowness of spi rits. In this miserable situarloti I had recourse to your eNdill Balm of Gilead, and bought a small bottle from Mr. Smith. North-Brklge, your Agent in thik City, (to. whom reference my be had) from which / derived so much advantage as to be able in the course of a few days to resume my employment; slice that time I have taken several bottles more. from which I have aiso experienced ' 'far benefit, so much so, that to your medicine, under D/VIN C PaovIDENCE, I look upon as tl:e preservation ef my life. Accept, therefore, dear Sir, of my mast grateful thanii; and believe me, with respect, your :mu obedient servant, JOHN SHORT. This celebrated Medicine is sold by Mathews and Ltigh,lB, Strand, in bottle* los. 6d. each, or Four in one Family Bottle fo► 330. ly which 9a. are saved, including also the duty, the ramp of which bears the proprietor's name and address in the engratimg, " Sand. Sokanon, Liverpool," without which none are genuine. CHALLENGE. MESSRS. CURRIE and Co. Nrgeons, late irrhis Majesty's Service, challenge the Oliole world to prove single Instance where their Medicine and method of cure lure failed of the desired effect. The practice of many years in Ova particular branch of their protession has not given rise to ore unsuccessful case. They continue to direct their studies to the treatment and erre of Venereal Complaints, and that derangement of the systers, which is the consequence of the pernicious and wastefol effects e'a habit long and most unhappily pursued by the youths of both sere , in the one it will be found to be the unfaling source of barren ness ; the other have its ravages fatally developed to them by a di treating state state of debility, which, if not timely remedied, terminates in impotence. These are its remote and ulti nate effects, whlle or sumptlons,loss 01mi-cuter power, and variou s nervous compla:tes usually characterise the earlier stages of thissolitary vice. Of per sons languishing under the disorder, incident to such a habit, their treatment is simple ar.d has never proved unsuccessful, in the course of a long, laborious, and much extended practice. its the most obstinate and complicated CAM'S of Venereal infection, tura as obstructions in the urethra, spungf excrescences, hard mours, callous ulcers, eruptions, seminal weakness, glees, as alsa • tiTRIC FURES, Whether recent or of foil duration, and which have bafiltd. the skill of other Practitioners ; are by their rresent improved plan Of treatment, effectually and permanently cured, without the patio:: suffering the excruciating pain and alarming li?inorrhage %chi:a often follows the application of the lunar caust In the .:out:e 20 years extensive practice in this metropolis, numerous cases of Strictures have been and are daily under their are, the rural eradication of which are effected by a safe, certain, and expedi tious mode of practice, superior to any other yet adopted. Ike weakness, relaxation, and debility rroceetiing from this crimple: ea, is speedily removed, and the pa.ient re. tired to sound .t ,d vi gorous health. Bat where the debility has for years exi.vist 6 proper perseverance in their restorative remedies, alter the :Wit - titre has beets destroyed, is indispatisahly rs ./..isite to revive thu . slumbering sparks of life and to reanimate the Constitution. Several Noblemen and Gentkmen, of the first respaitabiltty ' have been sander the care of Messrs. Carrie and Co. kw ale re moval of complaints of the Urethra, Strictures, &c. sad, having received a raa'cal and permanent core, reqiiest that I ..feretices may be made to them as • atisfaetory eviderces tat the decided su periority of Messrs. (..urrie and Co.'s p:au of rreatm rt. ManY of these Gentlemen have hal Strictures titan: tcri to twenty Irani and had been under the care of Nle, , rs Howe and fit avindess and other surgeons of espial emits( nce, who attempted the uire by the application of the lunar caustic, without success. Messrs. Currie and Co. may be consulted by either sex with the greatest delicacy, secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. 1 07 1 liattort-Garden. Patients in the country are requested to state the particulars of their case, age, and general habit of living, ikc inclosing a remittance for advice and niet!•cines, when the sure will be given or sent to any part of the kingdom. To ensure that secrecy so essential to their undertattrg,.th e postage of Letters may be added to the accom tor medirir.. 9th June,lBo9-107, Hattoo•Garden. LONDON: Parted and publhhed by LEVEL. KENT, of Cr• terborpillat% Lambeth, at the STA R-Orricr, No. I, Caleit itr Pabilhbeti also at the STAIO.O Frict., Ton ple Do. .- ,41. I