Star. — London, England, 1822-06-07 00:00:00

.. SONG. rum THZ NZW MONTHLY HAGAZINI. When Napoleon was flying ' • From the field of Waterloo, A British soldier, dying, To his brother bid adieu! , And take, he said, this token To the maid that owns my faith, With the words that I have spoken 412 affection's latest breath ! Sore mourn'd the brother's heart. When the youth beidde him fell ; But the'trumpet warn'd to part, And they took a sad farewell! There was many a friend to lose birth For that gallant soldier sigh'd, But the maiden of his bosom Wept when all their tears were dried ! T. C. LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JUNE 6. TRUWHITT, GENT. V. KENT. This was an action to recover the sum of £ll. 18s. the amount of the plaintiff's charges as the attorney for the defendant, in a suit commenced in her name against a person named Hitchinson. Mr. Aootenus having opined the case, called Jo seph Walmsley, a Sheriff's officer, who stated, that having a writ against the defendant, he went to call on her, when, in conversation, she mentioned her claim on Hitchinson, which she said the plaintiff would prosecute on her behalf, and would not call on her to pay her anything till the case was decided.— The witness denied ever having said that she was at all events to pay nothing. It appeared that she sub sequently took on herself to compromise the suit without consulting her attorney, so that it never came on for trial. Mr. COMNION SenJeastr,.after commenting on the l channel through which the business came into the hands of the plaintiff, stated that he should be able to shew that it was distinctly stated by Walmsley, that Miss Kent should pay no costs, and called three wit nesses, who deposed that he made this promise. Mr. ADOLPHUS, in reply, said that he might have objected to the evidencefor the defence on the ground that Valmsley's declarations would not bind the plaintiff without the previous establishment of a con nexion between them, of which there was no proof; but that be had suffered it to be given, as he was more anxious to vindicate the character of a most honour able practitioner of the law, than to gain a verdict. He put it to the Jury to say, whether they believed these witnesses, all swearing in precisely the same terms for the purposes of the cause ? The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE observed to the Jury, that if they believed Walmsley, the plaintiff was en titled to his full demand; and if they, on the other hand, believed the witnesses for the defendant, they would still bear in mind that she, by compromising the suit without his authority, deprived him of that op portunity of recovering costs froth the adverse party, which could be his only motive for desiring to pro ceed, it he was not entitled to expect any payment from his client. If, therefore, they thought that the business had been undertaken on an engagement that the defendant should incur no liability for costs, they might still give the plaintiff some reasonable com pensation for his exertions. The Jury, however, found a verdict for the defendant. DOE,,ON TILE DEMISE OF JOSEPH PALMER, V. ROBERT LOVELL GWATKIN AND THEOPIIILA GWATKIN. This was an action of ejectment brought by the heir at law of the late Marchioness of Thomond, to recover possession of a house situate in George-street, Westminster, which the defendants claimed un2er the will of the Marchioness. Mr. MARRYATT was about to address the Jury for the lessor of the plaintiff, when Mr. SCARLETT rose, and said that he would admit the prima facie title of the lessor of the plaintiff, and would at once open the case, by which he should render it of no avail. The simple question. for the Jury to try was, whether a paper, purporting to de vise the house in question to the defendants, had been duly executed by the Marchioness of Thomond as her last will ? Her Ladyship, at the time when she be gan to make her will, resided at Taplow Court ; but having given up her house there to a friend, she came to,London, where, in the year 1816, she began to contemplate the final settlement of her affairs. She was desirous of consulting the Bishop of Winchester and his Lady on the subject, and requested them to witness the execution of her will. The Bishop, un derstanding freehold property was to pass, informed her that three witnesses would be necessary, and ac cordingly Mr. Smith was sent for ; and she then, in the presence of all the wit:resses, signed the last of several sheets lying together,' or retraced the letters of her signature, and declared the whole to be her will. The other sheets were not fixed together at the. time ; but they would be found to have reference to each other, and by the last memorandum, to which her final signature was immediately subscribed, she stated, that since writing the previous papers 1.7000 of her money had been I emitted from Madras, £iooo of which she bequeathed to John Gwatkin, and the . rest she directed should be-applied to the uses of her will, which proved that it was not the last sheet only that she intended to publish, because in that sheet there were no uses specified to which money could be applied. The question was, whether she intended tp execute all the papers as one will, or only the last of them ; for a person might begin his will at any period of his life, and continue it on until he felt the propriety of finally executing the whole, which he Might then publish as his testament? Other sheets were signed by her, but not attested ; and therefore, unless her last act amounted to a republication of,the whole, the defendants derived no title from the will; but lie had little doubt that the Jury would arrive at' the contrary conclusion. • It was proved that the papers produced in Court as the will of the Marchioness of Thomond, had been sent by her to her Attorney, Mr. Mortimer, and had been kept by him until opened after her death, in the presence of her relatives. They were paged through out, apparently in the writing of her Ladyship ; but were not fixed together until after her decease. Mrs. Tomlin, the Lady of the Bishop of Winches ter, who, with the Bishop, sat on the Bench at the . right hand aftis•Luri 41_01WOrro t then sworn. She remembered seeing Lady Thomoad at. her own , house in the year MI6 or 1817: in • a state of some agitation, when she ilia she had a favour to ask tal the Bishop. Mrs. Tor**, thinking that s he spas about to request him to become firer executor, replied. that she was afraid he would not accepx,sluss ofd as he had refused to do so for other friends. Shells. Tared, • after a pause, whether he would object to witness her will? to 'thick Mrs. Tosnline replied, that she had no doubt he would witness it, and that he would wait on her the next day, or the day after. She said she wished to go to the Bishop's house to execute the will; and accordingly went thither a day or two afterwards, and took the will in her muff. Them were several papers, but Mrs. Tomline could not re collect the exact number. After she had signed the' will, the Bishop recollected, that in case freehold pro perty were devised, it would be necessary that, the execution should be attested by three witnesses; lie !suggested this to the Marchioness, who expressed her gratitude for the information, and said that the house in George-street (that in question) was freehold. Mr. Smith was sent for, and she either wrote her name or retraced the signature, and said it was her will, on which it was attested by the three witnesses, in her presence.—On her cross.examination, Mrs. Tomlinel said that the Marchioness only signed one of the sheets, nor could she identify those others produced as the same which accompanied the paper attested. The Bishop of Winchester being sworn, expressed his distinct recollection of all the circumstances stated by his Lady, as attending the execution of the will. Mr. Smith, the other witness to are execution, gave the same account of all those circumstances which took place after his arrival. The papers endorsed " Last Will and Testament of Mary, Marchioness of Thomond," were put in, and partly read. The passages at the beginning and con clusion of the sheets were evidently connected in sense, and there was nO pecuniary bequest in the last paper to which the £6OOO, alluded to in the last paragraph, could be applied. Mr. Ma aavarr, for the lessor of the plaintiff, sub mitted, that the whole case resolved itself into a ques tion of law. It differed from any cases which had been already decided, although these were many resembling it in principle. Certain it was, that an ill-executed will would not be made good by a well executed codicil: and here a will ill-executed was to be made valid by a conversation, to shew that the testatrix contemplated a devise of the freehold when she executed the last paper. If this were permitted, it would destroy all the benefit intended br the Sta tute of Frauds, by substituting the parole declarations of parties for. those solemnities which it was most im poi taut to observe. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said, that, in his judg ment, it was entirely a question of fact for the Jury, whether the Marchioness republished all the papers produced as her will, or only the last of them? Mr. MARRYATT, then proceeded to contend, that the evidence did not sufficiently prove the identity of the papers. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE felt no hesitation in leaving the whole case to the Jury. Unquestionably a person might write his will on different sheets of paper, without attesting every sheet. Unquestion ably, also, it was unnecessary that these papers should be united by wax or string ; it was enough if they were all published as one entire will. Whether the papers in question were so published, the Jury would decide, from the purport and connection of the docu ments themselves, and the highly respectable evi dence which they had heard ; and if they were of opinion in the affirmative, they would find a verdict fur the defendant.—The Jury immediately found a verdict fur the defendants. WHATELEY D. PIGOT, COTTON, AND OTHERS. The SOLItITOR-GENERAL stated the case. The plaintiff had been a clerk in the i.ffices of Mr. Pullen and other lawyers. He was also a member of the Friendly Society, to the funds of which he became unable to subscribe in consequence of illness. Re fusing him that relief which their laws had provided for pumas in his circumstances, he obtained an or der from the Magistrates to enforce it. In order to he entitled to the benefit of the Society's laws he was •obliged to take an oath that he was not under twenty one years of age. The defendants then circulated printed papers charging him with perjury, and hence ' the peseta action originated. It appeared from the statement of Mr. SCARLETT, for the defence, that the plaintiff had gone right and left to work, having an indictment at Middlesex, and an action at Westminster, and that be had eluded one of the laws of the Society, which said that no folkower, scrivener, nor lawyer's clerk, could belong to the bociety. This law he eluded by repre senting himself as a merchant's clerk. - These circumstances had some weight with the Jury in mitigation of damages, and they, in consequence, gave the plaintiff A Farthing. HON. LADY BROMLEY V. KINSEY AND ANOTHER. This was an action by Lady Bromley and her sis ter, who reside together in Berkeley-squarecto re cover from the defendants, two inhabitants of the Hundred of Ossulston, damages for the injury done to their house by the mob on the day of his Majesty's Coronation. It appeared in evidence, that on the morning of the day in question, a crowd of persons, to the number of one hundred or more, passed by the house, where preparations were making for an illu mination in the evening, and threw stones against the window - s. They broke as many as required. 1:28.65. 3d. to repair them, which the glazier swore was a reasonable charge. Mr. GASELEE I for the defendants, submitted to the Jury whether £4.75. 3d. a pane for plate glass was sum which the Hundred ought to pay? The Lona) CH lET JUSTICE.--013, certainly. Ix would be too much to the injury of trade to say to the con trary, and so discourage the use of those ornaments which occasion the employment of so many hands.— There would be no knowing where to stop, if we were to admit that the costliness of an article should de-. prive its-owner of the protection which the law gives to his property. We might restrain every one to the use of mere necessaries, and the injttry to trade would be incalculable. The Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff—Da. znages, £28.65. 3d. the fell amount of the bill: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, JUNE e. A TAILOR'S BILLNIGJITINGALII V. IMAM The plaintiff is a first-rate tailor, in the west end of the town, and brought this action against a first-1 - - rate Imam, to vdeober - 13114141he.gdorli sold and deli vered. A bill had been ',slam months for £l6l. Serjemst Pact. &pod drisi hissof Ha prisair. The foreman proved the delivesiy. .The artistes which witness did not diver Jigsaw en the perh..ll of . the defendant. • • Cross,exassined.--Couki tell breeches of his own make upon a Goodman In the street, by the lung of 'sheen before or Wilda l " Were. them sot tiro of the - eossithst did sot fit r—“ , They id sot it the bead I" ," The head! I be t coats were usually made to St the hody r—Whness be might not be compelled to disclose secrets of trade. The was pressed. Witness.-.." We often make coats w It extremely well, but some fault Is km* Ned they arc eau back to be altered. In such a case, we gm obey do est ht the head. We keep tkan a proper time; end tbso Nod them back untouched, when they are found to be just else Mot, sod to fit ddigbtfidly !" Part of the bill had been paid.--Two witnesses swore the pt ices were most moderate. Berjeant Pa r. called three tailors, who swore the charges were much too high ; R 6. 6s. should have , been charged-instead of Li. Bs. and £B. Bs. instead of 12s. 125. . The sum sought for was 1:110. The witnesses for the defence thought £74 a proper charge.—Verdict JC9S. PREROGATIVE COURT. - 'fr• SATO V. ATKINSON AND WESTCOTT. 1 TMX was a question respecting the validity of a paper, pro pounded by Mrs. Susannah Saph, purporting to be the last will of William Harcourt, Esq. of Salisbury, deceased, appoi vier her sole executrix and residuary legatee, and which was opposed by Thomas Atkinson, Rsq. and Mr. W. Westcost, executors named in two forma wills, on the ground of fraud, forgery, con piracy, and perjury. This case having occupied several days argument, the Court this day gave judgment at great length. Sir J. Nicuott observed, the factum of two former wills was pleaded—the one dated the 24th of October, 1818 ; and the other the 14th of June in the same year. The pretended will was dated June 14, 1819. Seventy witnesses had been examined,and a great mass of evidence introduced. This case did not turn on the question of capacity, but on the factum of execution, whe ther in reality it was the act of the testator. Three witnesses had attested the instrument, and if they were to be believed, there was an end of the question. The manner in which instruments are found after the decease of testators, was molt material to connect the instrument with the testamentary intentions of the deceased. The disinterest of the panics producing the instrument, or where it was in possession of the testator, tended to shew its genuineness. On the death of the testator, this instrument did not possess these advantagest It was produced by Mrs. Saph, the deceased's house keeper. Other circumstances which excited still stronger suspi cion of the fairness of the transaction was, the will was in the hand writing of John Saph, her son ; and the attesting witnesses were himself, his brother, and a sister. The parties, it was evident ' were not unacquainted with his affairs, as his housekeeper, Mrs. Saph, had the entire management of his domestic concerns. This in strument was evidently drawn from the substance of former wills; but whethee by the directions of the deceased, became material to inquire. It was represented by the parties to this, that the former will had been destroyed; but it turns out, al though the original was not forthcoming, yet two former wills were actually in their possession, although they stated them to have been destroyed. This discovery took place after it was deposed by John Saph, that when he prepared the will of 1319, both the former wills and instructions for the present had been destroye.:. The Court remarked, that in general suspicion attached to the destruction of former wills or in structions ' • this happened frequently where there was something to conceal. The Court did not attach muck importance to the party in this case endeavouring to snatch a probate before due time had expired, but as connected with other circumstances of more weight. The parties to this instrument were the mother and three children. Mrs. Saph, the mother, takes the bulk of the property; and if the others were not directly benefited as lega tees, they were likely to be influenced in the mother', interest. Jane Mayer, who lived servant with the deceased, deposed to a conversation between them, in which Mrs. Saph said to the testator, she wished him to do something more for her; to which the testator answered,• he had done enough already. The de ceased was afflicted with erysipelis, which had caused him to lox the use of his hands. Mrs. Saph said, she wished he could get the use of his hands to write, for she believed he would then do something more for her. This was before the date of the former will, and by which it appeared she took only ten pounds per annum. There was nothing beyond personal care and at tendance on the deceased that gave Mrs. Saph any claim on him; though, after discharging his servant, she became his nurse and only attendant. Her history was this :—She had been noticed by the deceased before her marriage. At this time she was separated from her husband, and had a large family to support in a humble situation of life. John Saph, her son, had b-en three years Clerk to an Attorney, and had been dismissed from his situation ; and his general character was liable to dis credit. Ile was at this time in no situation. These circuits atances, although they did not warrant the presumption, yet" favoured the suspicion, that he was capable of fabricating this instrument. The law was extremely jealous in such a trans- , action, conducted entirely by parties who were themselves to be benefited ; and it was a painful duty the Court was called on to perform, in deciding on conflicting testimony. In this case, however, it was under no necessity of pronouncing against the party, as in a case of forgery, supported by perjury, which belonged to their' jurisdiction to determine, it merely pro d for, or against the validity of the instrument pro- 1 pounded. In a charge of forgery, if any doubt existed, the presumption was in favour of innocence. The Court would merely decide as to the probability whether this execution was the act of the deceased, or of the party bringing forward the instrument. It was led to consider the instrument itself, and the nature of the disposition. It would compare It with former wills. By these the testator had adhered to one deliberate pur pose of leaving the bulk of his property to Mr. Westcott and his family, and considerable legacies to Mr. Atkinson and his family. These persons were in his entire confidence, and he appointed,, them Executors and Trustees. I By the paper propounded, an entire revolution in his testa mentary intention had been manifested, not only substituting Mts. Saph for Messrs. Atkinson and Westcott, but even to cer tain Dank Stock which he had left to charitable purposes; and which alteration was insufficiently accounted for by extrinsic ctrl cumstancee. Both the former wills were prepared by his confi dential Attorney, Mr. Wilmot, who had been so for forty years, and had prepared his wife's will, and he continued to be so em ployed by the deceased even after the date of this last instrument. The deceased was nearly eighty years of age when he died, and was of sound mind. In the summers of 1817 and 1818, Mrs. Saph, with her son and daughter, accompanied him to Lyming toq, and skewed great attention to him during his illness- The son, John, was employed by the deceased in receiving rents for him, when he could not write, and signing receipts in his (Mr. Ilarcourt's) name. The JOVE commented upon thw signature to the will being different from the manner in which the testator usually signed his name, by comparison of hand-writing. The final t at the end of Harcourt, had the stroke drawn back instead of for ward. This appeared to correspond with the signatures to all those receipts wherein he had signed the name of Mr. Har court, by his permission; but there was no positive evidence whether this was or was not the execution of the testator. The story told by the attesting witnesses was, that the deceased read over the will himself, sheet by sheet, and put his signature and characters to each of the four sheets, - J. Saph having previously read them to the deceased. After dwelling upon a variety of irreconsilable circumstances, which induced the Court altoge ther to discredit the testimony of these witnesses, as resembling, a family compact, it came to the decision, that although it was not warranted in pronouncing this paper a forgery, and that supported by perjury, which was the province of another juris diction to determine, yet, upon the whole of the evidence, it felt it was not warranted in giving effect to this iustrument, as hav ing been executed by the testator, but Abe duty of the Court was to give effect to the former instrument; ancrthis party propound iug nothaving - furnished such evidence as that upon which the moral justice of the Court could rely, it was bound to condemn t. them in costs. 4I Lately, the mail coach horses bicoming unmanageable, near Thurso, M'Gregor, the guard, attempted to leap a% but his great coat becoming entangled, the coach well overturned before he could get himself disengaged: he felt underneath it, and was so much hurt that he died in two hours. ..r . , scorfor'rr .„ • ... • - Perm% biliminlb .. _ ikeitanereoftAtiiltiedlrillesil 4,1 0 101,14,•ett Isra jon ugh es : p ttp 4. eharead The piefloNsidlh war iv 1 nd • d t r a z i, in tt Sr. :se committed to take tali Mal et she lest ettodneer Scssirns.., Winks* CutiOsot 11‘11011‘ to the Ed Reef them of I' m * Owe. was eferied sehlt.wasling a hag from the chop of Mt, Jaw rerring, in the strand. eery ccalir confessed that ha did steal the bat. His object was strongly suspected to be, lszt he might be sent to Dotany Bay. ne was et:nmated for trial. George Leek, late a servant hi the employ of blesses. Cyzr,,, tobacconists in the Haymarket, underwent a second examen,. tion, on suspicion of having robbed them to a considerable er-• tent, front a varlet, of suspicions eiteantstanees, bat they fail e d in the direct proof. Durreas.—Edward Imes, wisp appears in diretent dresses 4., the purpose of &eating and defrauding persons, was clrg r ,,, with cheating and defrauding Witham Perkins, En. of i'avi stock-place, He was orddred td find bail, or be committed, John Arthur was laity committed for trial, for breaking o rm and robbing the cottage of J. Whittaker, near Ashttd, in Sums- Qom:a-Soca ar.-2'llonsas "anthems and James Mellystivz, cr eates in the 3d Regiment of Foot Guards, were eramined o • * charge of having robbed their quarters, the King's Head, Jr. street, Buckingham-gate, of sixteen bottles of Mountain ' I,ishc 2 , and Sherry wines, a quantity of ale, and vinegar...--Rernansled. Harros-Gaanzu.—lt has beers atrziged,. that Read, t!;t officer, shall go to Barking jail on Sate rday, to inspect the 1+1•,,, : , s who are suspected of being the murderers of Mr. Mu acy. Tuesday night a Gentleman went into the Italian Opera •House, and entered into conversation with ti , e veteran Police-officer, TOWNSIkEND, who observing. his gold chain and bunch of gold seals, advised the gentleman to take care of his watch (a gold chro nometer value 35 guineas), which the gentleman drew out, and said to Mr.TowNsHEND, .. Oh, 1 will take care of it," and then returned the watch, as he ' believed, to his fob pocket. In about ten minntes afterwards the gentleman discovered that his watch and its appendages were gone t but whether it was stolen, or had slipped down his trowsers, .he was not certain. On TOWNSIIEND being informed of the lc, , he said to the gentleman, ~ I had my suspicio2, from your flashing your watch so much, that it would go; let the nert be a stop watch." _ Wednesday evening a boy,. while endeavou t ing to climb behind ale of the Black wall stage eoacliv , , passing along High -street, Poplar, one of the irua spikes unfortunately ran through his wrist, and he was dragged after the coach a considerable distance before he was extricated. It is feared he mast un dergo amputation of the arm. A poacher, well known at Maidstone by the name of addier, was on Sunday morning discovered oa Coiheath, near Hunton Woods, quite dead. When found be presented a shocking spectacle, the lower part of his face and throat beinn. t , much lacerated, and he was covered with blood. On tracing the blcoj to a hedge a few yards distant, a gun was perceived lying on the opposite side, which appeared to have been recently discharged. From this circumstance, and the man's wounds, it is coejecterea that he was following his unlawful pursuit., and, in getting over the hedge, he was in the act of drawing the gun after him, when it went off, and lodged the contents in hi. throat and lower part of his face. He appears to hate staggered a few paces before he fell. Tuesday, William Mcntgomery and Charles Ml cock, journeymen carpenters, residing in G:avC• lane, having occasion to go to Turnlia rn-7eeen to vi,'; the wife of the former (to whom he had been !wt . a fortnight married), they hired a boat, and unciertet:-: to row themselves , but they got entangled :trim:- some craft above Vauxiiall - Bridge, when NI:.!1, • mery got up to push off the boat, and by the frr;:e; ;... the exertion was pitched nv.erhoard.and drown.:.d.— When the news was conveyed to his wile, she v.-ea into hysterics, and has since remained in a state of insensibility. On the lii instant, as John and Henry Curling, 19 and 21 years of age, were amusing themselves with a sail on the river Stour, the boat upset, when John, the younger, got entangled in the sail, and sunk to rise no more. The elder, Henry, was picked up alive, but has been insensible ever since. The river running close to the garden, their cries of distress were heard by their mother and sisters, who could afford them no assistance, and who had no idea at the time it pro ceeded from them. They are the sons of Mr. W.Cur ling, of Sandwich, and nephews to Dr. Curling, of Upper Brook-street. BIRTHS. House, the ;,Ist ult. the Hon. Mrs. Fleming, At of a daughter. June 4, at Leamington, the Lady of Sir Eardley Wilmot, Bart. of a son. Monday, in Grosvenor-square, the Lady of John Maberir, Esq. M.P. of a daughter. MA Rama At Dallyaugherin Church, John Holland, Esq. 86th Regimen:, to Mary, second daughter of Avercll Leeky, Esq. of 13ichitio:At place, and Castle Lecky, county of Derry. May 30, John Scott, Esq. of the Ordnance Office, to !..1 Elizabeth, daughter of Richard Welbank, Esq. of the Tower. June 1, Charles, son of Sir William Wake, Bart. of Court:en Hall, Northamptonshire, to Charlotte, daughter of Craututl Taite, Esq. of flarviestown, N. B. June 1, Lieutenant-Colonel Couper, Deputy Quartermaster- General, to Elizabeth, daughter of the Hon. Judge Wilson, of How, Westmoreland. DIED. April 2, 11 sea, on Me passage from Madras, George Poke, Est late Judge of the Provincial Court of Appeal and Circuit, at Chltton. May 31, William, tan of Tient.- Colonel W. 11. Perkins, of the Hon. Company's Bengal Establishment. March 23. in George Town, Demerara, after a short Catharine Campbell, aged 25, relict of the late Evan M.P...: - - son, Esq. May 23, at St. Andrew's, Mt. William Bruce, Student of Divinity. June 2, Elizabeth Sarah, wife of Brevet late of the 11th Regiment of Foot. At the Royal Infirmary, Pheenis Park, Dublin, ih the 1 Stit year of his age, William Castle, youngest son of Dr. Castle, Ennis. 111 y. May ls, at Church-house, Tenbury, Worcestershire, Alex:...- der Johnstone, Esq. one of the oldest surgeons of the Royal Na , June 3, Elsa, wife of J. E. Bicheno, Esq. Barrister At 1.. t. -• of Upper Gloucester-street, New-road. June 1, at Shelley, near Ongar, in Essex, in the 73d year his age, William Bullock, F.sq. Clerk of the Peace for Or. county for upwards of 37 years. Thomas Phillips, an Attorney's Clerk, residing in Brewer street : he Went to bed on Sunday night in good health, and was found dead next morning. France Hamburgh Flanders Jamaica Goctenburgh 1G H• WA Morning . Afternoon Ks. I,l*f. O 0 0 • 1 O 0 O 0 • 0 ;sat LONDONBitiDGE TO-MOH itoi% . O" minutes afters . so 45 LONDON : Printed and published by LaratAsser, Pickt;:. place, Temple-Ha. MAILSTMIX DAT.A/PAR. Dublin 1 o Waterford 0 it Gun way sad Jersey 1 0 Lisbon 0 2 Holland i 0 HIG H. WATER At LO_N DOI 1~ t 4 ;. ~f ~~ ~'