Star. — London, England, 1817-08-04 00:00:00

~. TXa lIMAINIIII trim TRIALS. (free the Leed• Potereeep) • 4 sd. isv or the four.andltisenty persons against whom the Government Solicits* was instruct-1J of institute pro seeuli-mo till have been prottounced N t Guilty ; ' against eleven others no Bills were found, and one has been liberated on bail; leaving only two of the whole number in continemAnt, and those two unfor tunate men have been detained, witt.out trial, by a Secretary of - State's warrant, tinder the suspension of thefiabeas Corpus Act.—Thus ends the Plot I The failure of these prosecutions has not been owing to arty want of val. or an deficiency of reans, nn the part of the Governmc f..;' 'Some time bere t * the . trials came on, the Solicitil Tor tie• Crown i sriA'selit down 'um the neigT,bottikpid . id lltidders ficP, to collect evidence against Or rilsOtiers. In support of this evidence, a large . portio'n Of the Weight and talent of the' Bar, on the Northern Cir tolt, ems ranged on the Side of the prosecution.l Tire odds woe terriEc; but with the seal and inielli- genet of their professional advisers and advocates, and the presiding presence of a righteous Judge, who knows no distinction between the lofty and the hum. ble. in the administration of Justice, the trial by Jury obtained another distinguished triumph, and the pri soners, alter a period of deep anxiety, were restored to their liberty and to their friends. While we speak of the zeal manifested by the persons ntfieially engaged in the trials of the pri soners, we cannot hut regret that the Judge should have had occasion to complain, in the presence of Mr. Allen and Mr. Haigh, the committing Magi). trates, that the deisositions of the witnesses had not been returned to him, as the duty of the Magisl irate: replied, till he bad made particular inquiry for them. The upright mind of Baron Wood, it was evident, felt wounded by this proceeding,' and any thing like reluctance to give to the ac..' clued all the advantages of any discrepancy be teen the original examination of a witness and his evid.uce before the Court, will always be viewed with suspicion by a people jedous of their privileges, and noxious, in the highest degree, to preserve the stream of public justice her from contamination. The apo logy m.cle for this suspicious omission was that some of. the examinations were not taken on oath ; but that surely is no reason why the others 'should be with h I.—.and why, we should be glad to: kkew, were esannewstions, involving the liberty And lives of many otinirl.countrymen, nut taken in the VRI4I and autho rised way ? ,,.. - . We readily admit that the °fencerPy proved to have been co i•initted in the neighbourhood of Huddlisfiew, on the night of the Bth of June, called for le w d investigation : but while we deprecate po. pubis tumult and violence, in every shape, and call tor putd,liment upon the lawless, we shall always, its.the benign spirit of the English law, claim for the accused candour and fair dealing on the part of the! public prosecutor. Alike, rather than ii,stividion, ooght to be the object of the Government, and of all the persons acting under their directions and autho rity. We have been led into these t•bservations by a circumstance of a very extraordinary nature, limbos Come to our knowledge. But before we proceed to state the facts to w hich we allude, it may be proper, for the perfect under standing of the subject, to quote the words of Baron Wood, in his charge to the Jury, on the trial of B. Lockwood and others, for maliciously shooting at Mr. David. Alexander, one of the Huddersfield yeomanry cavalry, on the night of the Bth of June. Aftrr adverting to the testimony of George', Armytage, one of the witnesses for the Crown, who had sworn that he and a person of the name of Earnshaw, or Hearnshaw, had been forced to join the rioters at Fully-hall Bridge, his Lordship said, " There is another circumstance deserving the se rious consideration of the Jury—the non-production of Hearnshaw as a witness. He has been in the cus• tody of the prosecutors; he is now at York; he was stated by the witness to have been present, and to have seen all the circumstances that Armytage . has asserted in evidence; and yet he is not produced ! The Jury will draw their own inferences from this strong fact. It was the duty of the prosecutors, and due to the justice of the case, to have broukt,forward this witness." • : • • Upon this text of Mr. 13.rron Wood.l . 4ho , follii4r ing detlisration of Charles Hearnshaw, theuwitnestfefer red Td;" furnishes the alai ming commeni : we p u blish the-d:icumeut, verbatim, as it has been sent to us (with the exception of one word used sportively by the Grand Jury), choosing rather to retain even the grammatical inaccuracies, than to make any altera tions in the paper itself : DECLARATION OP CHARLES HEARNSHAW, TIANSPUTTLID 808 PUBLICATION illoll woorasasirtaLo, Os TiIUBYDAT, TUB Xiti or Jute, 1017. 14 I was examined, an the Inn of June, by Mr. B. Hales Allen, Magistrate, concerning the Foil,/ Hall fight s—Hs &eked roe if I could tell him who- fired first t I told him the cavalry first, at the runty flail Bridge, on - the 6th of June. Mr. Allen ' told me I was mistaken, it was a gen in Manchester-street that I beard. I told him it was not a gun in Manchester-street, it was the Gesitlemen Cavalry; I was c.nain of it; but they would no' put that in my examination. When I was going to be exa =hied by tie Grand Jury at York, Mr. 'lliontu Atkiasou came to me, and asked sue if I would do him a favour? I asked him what it was? He said, tie could wish me to say the mob fired first; and be buoght me a shilling's worth of oranges; cad lie told nit if I did not say the mob flied first, I should have four or five evidences against me, nante4, Mr. Thomas At thaw, Mr. David Alexander, Mr. Allen the hlagietrate, and George Whitehead, -the consable. I told the Grand Jury the I I truth; I told them the cavalry fired- Ent, and I told them I , the ball oiled close by Dy head.—l hey asked me if I was not afraid t I told them 1 was not. l told them, then there was about eight or nine of else mob Bled, and Immediately the cu valry gailopped od The Grand Jury said, they mid laughed- Saturday, the 26th, a Gentleman from London sent for me, Mr. Lagar, Solicitor tut the Crown, I thick they call'd him, and he asked ore what 1 meant to say when I got into the Coon? I told him I meant to speak the truth; I told biin I nwatl to say that the cavalry fled first. He told Me I was a d-.-4 Wog wing, and bald I bad bad con- Vertatios: with Buckley, and he had persuaded nr. , to ray an He Antrim if I coohl not as well say the mob IWd liniloas say the cileibifited Ant ? Mr. /salmon likewise-BM me Ruck ley tied beeirtitiktng to me, and had penuaded rile tout the.ca valeyiliertlistr and because 1 wi.uld not say istbey'stranied, I was 'lever brought op to give my evidence in Colitt 6 . and when 1 illasiiiiiiitcaton to Mr. Allinson, the attorney; f *thing to carry rue bust he said lie ha d orders to gore me nothing; and Mathew iisatiley, clerk to Mr. Alien, said 1 should be pillo- Mad Before the three months' end, if I did not mind what I was about. And this is the real truth. lam ready to attest it before My man in Englwd. (011gUltd) " CHAS. HtARNSUAII." It the Assertions of this witness for the Crown are to be relied upon, he was first tampered with, then insulteJ, and lastly, withheld from the witness' bog, because he did not cbeow.ti, fashion his evidence ac cording to the Manion of thy: hostcutors. LAW FRl.L.lcßive.e. COURT 01 CHANCERY, AUGUST la ittlriGC O lIYAM. The toms givinx judgment in this case, stated, fiat t' cane -lore the Court in the shape of a bill tilr.l , ealtiu g m die plaintiff to pa, into Clint a sorra of aCCBO, (.4. which the defendant was trustee,and that the dekidant 'night be rernosed from .the trusteeship of that noon.) , for a Mrs. Win terbottom. It appeared by the b ii. that Susan Bridge wan, in 1811, martied to a prcon named Winter bottom ; and that the plaintiff settl.-LI on herself the the suns 44280, wit:: remainder to her Children but it she shntilii have no children, she might'herlueath it to whoin.sim.thought proper. She had but one child who diet infancy, and it was improbable ahe would have and . more. as she wa•; separated from het husband. Mrs. Winterbot tons had sworn, that Hyani, who was appainted her trustee, had recently led sec a lite, and had he tiblit:d to part with all his real and personal property to pay his debts, that she was afraid of her property, it it should fall into his hands ; to accomplish which Hyam had brought an Action to compel Bridge to pay him over the 11280 against her consent, of which she had given him notice, in order to put a stop to the action. In his answer, Mr. Hyam contradicted all that had been sworn by Mrs. Win terbottom, about the badness of his life, or his having been obliged to part with all his property to pay his debts. Mr. Hymn and his Solicitor both swore that the action to compel Bridge to pay over the 4280 to Mr. Hyam was entered with the knowledge, and even at the request cf Mrs. Winterbottom, who had told them that she received her interest of the money very irregularly ; and finally that Hymn had been obliged to pey 420, being the Solicitor's bill, whir prepared the deed for settling this 0280 on Mrs. 'Wintethot i..m. Looking at the whole case, his Lordship saw no reason to think that Hymn had acted any other part than that of a careful trustee; and he therefore ordered that the money should be raid into Court before the next Seal; and that an account of Mr. Hyam's claim should be taken. in order to his being paid out of the money so to be paid into Court. ItUSIILBY V. JERWINGNAIf. The LORD Cirasiorra.uou proceeded to give judg. ment in this use, calling upon the defendant to pay into the, plut £6,715, due on the purchase of an estate. It appeared that the defendant had pnrchaled the laropemy . oi,question in the name of Another per son, but really for himself. He had, howAvors become dissatisfied rift the purchase; and it appeittvds was of opinion that he might put an end to the bargain by forfeiting the deposit. He had, however, entered into possession, and had had tronsactions with the tenants. His Lordship therefore thought that, looking into all the cis cumstances of the case, it was right that he should be held to the bargain —Order refused. SUFFOLK ASSIZES. LAMBERT AND Wlli 9. TAYLOR. This was an action for an assault upon the plaintiff Mrs. Lambert, with a horsewhip in the defendant's house in June last. The defence was that the &ten. dan: had repeatedly warned the wile off his premises. —Verdict for the plaintiff—Damage s 410 TOONE V. THE INHABITANTS Or DOSSIKNI AND CLATDON• This was an action, she Act a f Geo I. giving the party, whose property was destroyed by fire, wilfully, maliciously, and feloniously, the Means of getting compensation against the Hundred. The fire bap. pened to the plaintiff's property in Somersham.— Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages £l2O. WALKZR O. r'Z. This action, which wes boughtbought or rent and dama. ges alleged to be done to the property of the plAintiff, which the defendant occupied at Baton Mills, in this county, was referred to Mr. Alderson. • OWEY V. kIURIAT. This was an action for wages which the plaintiff claimed of the defendant, who is a gentleman of considerable property, living at Newmarket, with whfas she lived as a servant. Verdict for plaintiff, 9s. 6d. CROWN SIDE. The first prisoner put to the bar was Joseph Bred field, charged with stealing a silver watch, the pro perty of fiinsuel Rice, of Eye. The priseeeris a bdy about 14:yeaks'of age.—Guilty, but owisOoitat Of his yeas, rreuthtnended him to mercy. • ' 11 " Athol Arsostave: was next brought to the bar Ott a charge)* buoglary.—Seven years trsespertetion. Rektiiihmertand Baja:gin Sharma pleaded 'guilty to an indictment for breaking into the dwelling.honse of Robert Woolnough. The Learned Judge very dis tinctly stated to the prisoners, that if they pleaded Guilty in the hope that it would mend their cacr, they were deceived, as he would be bound to deal with them as if the Jury had found them Guilty. The pi soners,notwithstanding, persevered in pleading Guilty. James Sap, charged with stealing a silver watch, the property of Wm. Jennings, of East 11Crgholt. The watch was found on the prisoner.—Guilty. Jam Rickardsoa„ charged with stealing one ewe sheep, the property of Mr. J. Webb, of East Berg holt. The blood was traced to his cottage.—Guilty. CAMBRIDGE ASSIZES. • These Assizes were held on Tuesday. In conse quence of workmen beiag emplOyed in painting the Town Hall, the s:cell was so offensive, that the Judges refused to sit in the usual Courts: the Mister and Fellows of St. John's College, granted the use of their Halls, which were fitted up for the purpose, and there the Assizes were held.—W. Nicholls, aged 19, pleaded guilty to an indictment, ebaiging him with stealing ,81% the property of T. and F. C. Mortlock, Esqrs. bankers of Cambrdge, and was sentenced to be transported for seven years. BREACH OF PROMISE OP MARRIAGE. TURNER •. DENNIS. Mr. Hutt opened the pleadings by stating the charge is the declaration, namely, that the defendant 4i t had prcialfite at some future time to marry the' qfp tiff, or as as be should get settled;* 'll wished'O s tii ' knd make her comfortabliYl4 ..IY,' notwittistati such promise and underiatAlW dulentliiiiiff teitfully made to the said ,Ite had since broken this engagement, to the greatfilehl disappointment, loss, and injury of the said plaintiff, and for which the damages were laid at s 12,000: -Mr. Serjeaot Beossirry stated, that tbe vrties in the . cause, though" equally respectable, Were el yather a low situation in lite. Jane Turner, the plaintiff, lived , in the neighbourhood of Newnierict,' hsiing for rarity beet' a icisait in 'a• tertilemen'slansily, Whit' subsequently having ksit a • sielicil, and' 'tidied'. iff needle. work. The defendant Rasa man of subs!ance. and lived in credit and repute, as an inn-keeper, at Newmark& It would be proved in evidence, that as ram as the defendant became inn.keeper of the Crown, at Newniatk.t, the plaintiff seeing he was now El tied, Irnaked forward to their approaching marriage, and id consequence gave up the schhol ; in conse quence of Which she was now entirely without the means ,of supOorting herself. The courtship w e nt on for a considetable ante. - The declaration the plaintii most relied upon, and which would he prrived by the plaintiff's sister, was on the 15:11 March, which time the dele9dant asked the sister's coaleint, and taking her by theliind, with her con.ent also r !re promised theit'ensitiage should take place 5 6, •11. t.: even went so far as to pull out a marriage r ing , set, he offered to put ow her - finger, and desired she'st i onler keep it on; be; this plaintiff modestly declined, and observed that the ring was as safe in his hands as in her's. He proposed to her to wait upon her aunt, to request her consent in addition to that of her lathe; and sister. The plaintiff from this time heard farther Isom the defendant, nor did she sce hint till about ten days after she learnt he had married another oatn?d Diana Fisher, a servant in the family of the Rev. Mr. Hicks. It would appear, that at the very time lie made proposals to the p 1 iintiff, he was at the same time paying his addresses to Diana Fisher, Dow his wife ; and if there was any objection talcm 'to the conduct of the planitiff, the Learned Seijeant was ready to admit, that it proved, it would be sum cient grounds to excuse the defendant. The case being kovcd on the part of the plaintiff, Mr. Srongs, for deleirdant, put in the following let. ter, without date, addressed by pl .intiff to defendant : I her. Dennis, t retort, your bm.ks, and find myself ex•rertrely obliged by the perusal of them. I shohld hot have returned them at pre,ent, brit for what bat happened—fur u I have found out a new actitialnta:•ce I must seek teeth books to read I leave this to your liner iretation, for without doubt you have heard of it 1 1 I had the pleasure o seeing your father and nodded to him, but he did not return my nod. Believe me, nothing would give me so much phimire as the coninuance of lriendship betsvect our families, and you and myself, just so tar a. speaking to each other wb, o we mew ; and a. to our entirely forgetttag what has passed, it shall be fur ever erased from my min I. 1 .hall wait to return your letters, or commit them to the ILPllrei. I wish you would he the gc:odties to receive the sun, you paid on my account. I shall have pleasure iu returning it to you, and feel Infinitely obliged for ad favours. I remain, Ike. hint Tiusitaa." This Mt. STIMKS contended was a complete dis. charge 01 the defernlantas to any matrimonial claims. being entertained by the plaintiff from him. ,• - Mr. Serjvant th.lvalrfr replied. Chief Justice Mogi was of opinion the pl.iini t ittvas entitled to a verd-ct, and the Jury would say vs-hat damages.—Verdict for the plaintiff—Darnages £l5. Such was the exultation of the defendant and his party at these small damages given against him, that they were seen parading the btreetsof Cambridge with knfits of ribands in their hats, which usually denotes a victory, or the having gained a law-suit, which in this part of the country is a great subject of triumph. DEVON ASSIZES, JULY st. Lieutenant Waves Conroy and Ensign Alemeder Stewart, of the 90th regiment, were put to the Du, being charged, upon the Coronet's inquest, with murder. in a duel which took place with Lieutenant W. Hindi:, of the same regiment. in the early part of the year. It appeared that in October last a regi mental dinner was given, alter an inspection of the 90th, by the Officers, to which strangers were in . A kw Officers remained to a late hour, en joying the convivial cup. Among them were the prisoner. Conroy, and the deceased, Lieutenant Hindes. It so happened that Lieutenant Conroy (who.wasVice-Prebident) mentioned, in conversation the next day with Major Weir, of the same regiment, that they wete all tipsy the preceding night, and throwing wine about the room and chinking punch, which was directly contrary to mess regulations.— This assertion he happened to repeat the following day in the lirtgade Office, at Government-House, Plymouth-Dock, when Lieutenant Hindes observ ed, 66 When you stare any circumstance that has occurred, I should recommend that you would ad here to the truth," or words •to a similar import.— This not being heard, was consequently not not;ceil by Lieutenant Conroy; but some of his brother 011-, cers, who marked the expressions. informed him'of it tome days after, accmnpastied with some remark, that it was Lieuteaintgantroy's duty to have taken notice of it when it dibitt,,aphliese words had been sincere..' peated to other perm besides. Upon which Lieu tenant Conroy satd, s tliat finding such winds had been used, he should take the proper notice of them, and demand such reparation as they required. A meeting in consequence took place near Plimpton. early in the morning, about the 7lb of March last, and the prin cipals and seconds were the only persons present. Lieutenant Hindes was wounded, and brought house to an hotel at Plimpton, where some of them had slept the preceding night. and he died of the wound, which was under the eleventh rib, on the following day. . There being no other evidence than the two prisoners (one of the seconds being absent), who knew or witnessed any part of the transaction, the Grand Jury threw out the bill ; and when tried upon the Coroner's inquest, the same reason caused sn acquit tal, and the particulars were consequently not gore into. The Court was excessively crowded, and the utmost anxiety pervaded the minds of the audience upon the occasion. The prisoners surrendered them selves on Friday week ; one of them, Ensign Stewart, was second to Lieutenant Hindes. SEDUCTION. SMALL V. PARSONS. Mr. Serjeant Pam., as Counsel for the Plaintiff, in opening this case to the Jury, stated, that it was one of the most serious description, and be hoped many years would elapse before another of its description would be brought forward in the County of Devon. It was an action brought against the defendant by the plaintiff, for the seduction of his daughter ; and the declaration state, il hl kit the defendant did, in the' year . 1816, make w Osa*Blt upon Elisabeth Smola.. and th at he..then,K#WW. and thereby deprkttesi. she plaintiff of . .11pylvos, The plaintiff w a n 4 married man, whni t z pvta libildren; he was a fAra 'tiler, and 'a man of idity , and be (the Lear-. ned Counsel) was infOrmeri by the instrucuons whist, lay before him. that he was a highly respectable per son. At all erbitts, he was a father. and possessing the common feelings of a father, he must deeply feel the loss of the reputation and the services of hi: jalughter. She was about twenty, or twenty-twi, ',Opts of age. The defendant (Parsons) was also, as 'W(t* LearAd Serjeant). understood, a man of re- Silictability aad. property—at all 'events, his father was, Perhaps. flowerer, it %meld be e , deavosm-e to be shewn that he was not a man of property. Be this as it might,.porerty was no excuse for the cot-. mission of crime; nor did 4 not follow that a mee who had not money should not possess honour. Ife had beard it laid down by as great a man as eater adorned the English Birch (I.brd Kenyon), that it a man. Who had offended the laws of Iris county suss not competent to answer for the commission at sett off nce in purse, Ile raiglit to d , ,, it in person. Ti he dates :,des were only laid at relto. He knew nol Irate this tied happened; but bad be ben consnhed,•he should have advised them to have bico laid at a muck. larger sum. He never aawAhe voting tidy ; bat .1 what we.; stated was ttula`thrplaintiff would at least lsevntitled to the dilr.:4l iikeified in the rec rd.-- It was a lather who treertgftlhe actian, and his ago • itiaing feelings the Jury were bound by their verde: to assuage. Cases of the psetrat description w• - te sometimes treated with much levity in Courts of ft . .i., lice, hut on this occasion he addressed thttll on. the heedful a twit of lecher, arid a man of tramps. i' .tuck he acly asked the July to ela for the ilaintitt %that they would wish rlie.u!J be done toalierntelve:., should. circumstances place them (and GM fotbrd they aheuld) in a situation of a i in: Lir . desciiptinrr. Elizabeth Small, who is an interesting rid, was. now called, and she gave her evidence as falews : -.... " I am twenty-three years of :lee, and the daughter of James small, the plaintiff; he lives at Broadwoos: dealer, in this Count; ; I have a mother living ; my father's family consists of six children; I am the el. Jilt ; I have forte brothers and a sitter ; my sister is about eighteen years of age; my father keeps 4 maid servant, but before this transaction happen J, I was employed about the house. The defendant lives in --; he did not live there last year; he is a far mers and in the course of last year was carrying on business as a farmer on his own account, and thalami , was not a very small one; I because acquainted with • him about three years ago ; he then elivi d about ten miles from my father's house; he used to visit me with the knowledge of my father and mother; lie used to come very frequently ; I became with child by him, and was brought to bed on the ITh of Air gust last. My father paid the expenses tot my lyiiig ' in, and assisted me with necessaries." Crospeximainai dy Mr. CASBERD...-44 I hare known the defendant three vets; the farm the defendant cc eispied was at Litton—it is ab ut eight miles from _.......„ When I first lase! him. he lived with his lather. It is abrim a year and half since he live] at Litton. It was nut a veri sicall t..rm in which he - lived; it was let at if2lo per year, Lut I did not • know the size. My father has never go a- by aey other name as I know of. I hav t heard him called by the name of MaF.iient. I beiieve the maidetknatne of my mother was Small. I !ware the child to the defendant, Mr. Parsons; and I hive received money from the overseers of Breadwooduivr ;or the ex penses of my lying-in and wtekly maiatenance of the child. Mr. Parsons is abort twenty.reur or meaty. sve years of age; lam in rny twenty-third year. I. ' have not been in the habit of going to country fairs or revels much, bin I have hem at Holdsworthy fair. I have b?en at Boyton fair cnce, but not in the course or last year—it was in the year 1815."—This to Inated the cross-eitAminati•m. .... Mr. Serjeant Pet'. ohs rved, th it tli:s was his case. Mr. C a / I mm, in his address to the Jury in thitiga. tion of damages, said i.e could not help reviling. what he had already upon the Circuit often had oca casion to observe, that his Leased Friend had been instructed to say what was n.it the fact--that thit was a case of a very sorintis Description, cons,sting of the most infamous artifices on the part of the cle.en dant (Mr. Parsons). Serjeant PF.LL m died assinit to this observation. Mr. CAsBEND --g' i.ly fr.cm.l nods his head, bat there is nothing in that"—(4 Mr. CAsmth said his I..!•:lriird Friend's statements were not borne out in eviOerce. 112 c intended th.it it was an acqu escer.ce on both parties; th a t b o th were willing; that there was no artifice. no COntri. value, to seduce the phiintiff's daughter; th ft what • happened was the effect)cttapainary and casual ifite:- coarse ; and that the siiilitestd4MilgeS that coule tie •:, awarded would be ; Wd U oupensation Or the I..ss atid injuries sust • • Mr. Baron Camiliscliaagurnming np the case ihie Jen?. observed, that in all trans.:coins there were different shades of guilt and • :tcence; and ttte Jury were bound to look at the Coon:nuances of the cow, and to draw therefrom the best ctetcht%ion they could, upon impattial and mature consideration. The 1;;:l had told her story in a pl tin and Simple manner. had been stated, that it was the ordinary re,3l - from a c.u-tl intercourse. He hoped i!!,• of the country were not in such a state of degenera. lean ; it they w.. 1-0, the I.tws mutt guard ag.iii t them and if men choir to trav,l in such a course of ' rality, it w•. 111,1 b.f o::Iy right that they she old pay lbr it.—The Jury fOuild a verdict tot the•p'aint:ll—• Damages, 4100. LAW APPOINT.•• • • . • ...AW APP 011 , 4 T SI EN l's.••• The 1 - 10110111:1WE Sir. Emir, • son of Lord FicaLcv, anJ grandson ot vie Lord ' Chancellor NouritiNtir ne, is appointed a Commis, sinner of Bankrupts, vice Mr. Cotm rexAy, appointed a Master in Chanc-ry. The situAtion ot C:unstt to Queen Anna's bounty, is vacant by the appointment ot Mr. COURTEN AY. i is in the gift of the Arch. bishop of CANTERI:UIIY. The canJiLites, wo demand, are, Mr. RICHARDS, the snn o t t h e C IIIES I BARON of the ExCaLQUEIIt, aul hlr. Sii,ur agui of extensive practice at the Chait: , :ry Bar, i s i s sus . mated at £5OO a.year. CORN EXCI - 1.1 - NG L:, NIAR:c.-LANE, /JAM i T 4. We have had but a moderate sup;ly of Engl::a Wheat at Market sinctt List Manday, 1:3: a conside 'table quantity of Foreign, yet owing to the contiatt. , ante of untavourable weather, 6ne samples of our . own growth, from E4e:Mallvd- SuiJlk, sold full Zs. .per quarter higher ttbat-eir this day )... ce!:, but the .urdinary qualities are ti9s e lsitblc a 1.1.1r1.y i, 2s. ani Seats' 1u11.45. per quar,ter demee. O ats are also '1:. . pet qsarter higher, bdeetat biTsk sale at that advaic.r. CtiftagNT'PßlC t ti Ai UNCIPIR: • INGLISII. th:-, Poutee,3oß. 45. Wbnt, Kest and Eases, Old, I Ditte,l - uland, Sl2:. 4.3 50, lOU bate, feed, iSi .scis. I luaigk i LOs. 1044. ltapt-tcd, X.:O it*.s3 i tr last Norfolk. 20s. lOW. Euar, ::::.... ves. per •:.ck. Rye 40e.462. I Fr/K.:IC:v. darley, 343 434. Wheat, 1.).0,tmc, Ali, Wis. . Vial*, 60s. SOL Lap" 1.4. - Itic Red, 70i..:-.A. - / . „ , Aildte Nei, 664. se. . bailers; liamuro Of iircnlCD.l(A. ?xis. 403. 44.. Br..b.lnt Red, 703. 00.. • trey Peas, 421. 482. i Ryt, 00...005. !tun bums tbs. Xs. 1 .....I..zit.ii floJr, el. JO. I"