Star. — London, England, 1823-09-19 00:00:00

BANK MEETING. Yesterday a Court of Proprietors of Bank Stock was held, for the purpose of considering a Dividend for the half year ensuing. In consequence of a rumour that a further reduction in the Interest of Bank Stock would be proposed, the Court was crowded to excess. The Court of Directors entered at 12 o'clock, when the Chairman stated, that they had resolved upon proposing to the Proprietors a Dividend of 4 per cent. as interest and profit of the Stock for the half-year ensuing. —A resolution to this effect was then read to the Court. Mr. GUNDRY said, he considered it his duty to ask a few questions, but before he would do so he should hand in a document to the Chairman, which he desired should be read. The paper, which was in substance a demand that the accounts of the profits of the Company, and the expenses of management, should be submitted by the Court of Directors to the Proprietors, was then read. It was signed by Mr. Gundry and Mr. Lelwyn. At the re quest of Mr. Gundry, the bylaw, and the 63tt Section. of the Act of the 7th of Queen Anne, respecting the Cour is of Proprietors, were then read, but in so indis tinct a voice as scarcely to be intelligible. We under stood, b 0..% ever, that they declared that thefialf-yearly Courts should be held for the purpose of examining the state of the affairs of the Bank, and upon - those affairs stating a dividend. Mr. GUNDRY contended, both upon the authority of the by-law, and that of the section, that the Court of Directors were bound to make to the Proprietors a statement of the affairs of the Company, and that it was for the purpose of - examining into those affairs that the Court was now assembled, according to the Charter. Every Proprietor present sat there as a partner, and as such had a right to examine those accounts in which his interests were involved. He therefore called on the Court of Directors to give to the Court of Proprietors not a minute detail or exposure of their transactions, but a balance sheet, which would enable them to judge of the state of their affairs, and to declare such a divi dend as they should think proper under an examination of existing circumstances. Those who with him came forward at the former Court to support a similar mea sure were supported, and it would now be with the ma jority to say whether the system should be continued. Mr. YOUNG said, that the last position of the Hon. Proprietor, that the exposition of their affairs depended upon the will of the majority, was certainly correct. The majority had gone on in a system of confidence which was equally honourable to the Proprietors and the Directors; and he thought it was for the interest of the Company, as well as of the Public, that they should still continue to act on this honourable basis. But he, for one, must declare, that his confidence had been consi derably shaken by occurrences of the last 12 months: he alluded to the diminution of their dividend, and the conduct of the Court of Directors on that occasion. He had, when this important measure of the reduction of the rate of discount was proposed, put a question to the Chairman, Whether this reduction of their profits was made up by an increase of business? and he received for answer, that the Court of Directors, upon a consi deration of these matters, and of the whole of their af fairs, thought proper to recommend a dividend of four per cent. The Honourable Proprietor thencomplaiaed of the refusal which, he said, the Proprietors met with whenever they sought information which was of such vital importance to them. Unless the practice was al tered, the confidence between the Proprietors and the Directors, which had hitherto been so complete, must be shaken. The Honourable Proprietor wished to know whether the dividends were declared upon the present profit, or whether from a consideration of their future as well as present circumstances?—(Hear.) — The terms of the advertisement calling them together had lately been narrowed. They were formerly " to consider the state and condition of the Company's af fairs ;" now it ran, "to consider of a dividend." The Court were always treated with contempt and hauteur. What was the conduct of other Companies on similar occasions ? He was formerly a Proprietor of India Stock, but he sold it because he was so pestered by ap plications respecting his vote and interest—(Laughter, and cries of " Hear"). It was now necessary to make a stand against the conduct of the Directors. The number of Proprietors had been estimated at five thousand. It was impossible to get the Proprietors up from York shire ; many of the Proprietors were foreigners, others were widows and spinsters, who could not, from motives of delicacy attend—the present system could not stand. Mr. S. Discos said, as a Proprietor, he would stre nuously oppose any full exposition of the state of their affairs publicly. He thought, however,there were some expositions which might be safety Made to the Propriez tors at large. For instance, how easy would it have been, when the half yearly dividend at the last Court was reduced to four per cent. to irave stated, as the grounds of the measure, the decrease of the profits, by the reduction of the rate of discount from five per cent. to four ; the state of Exchequer Bills ; the neces sity which the Company had been under to keep their promise with the Public, by the return to cash pay ments ; the arrangements made with regard to the payment of pensions ; and other matters, by which the profits of the Company had been much diminished. The CHAIRMAN said, that the reduction of the rate of discount, the price of Exchequer Bills, winch were now at :Uri, a premium strewing so great a warn of em ployment for money, are really things so notorious, and so obvious, that the Directors considered it quite un necessary to make any such statements. The motion that four per cent. should be the divi dend for the next half year was about to be put, when Mr. GUNDRY again rose, and asked the Proprietors whether they would be content to declare a reduced di vidend without any explanation or knowledge of their accounts ? To resist this, he would now move as an Amendment, that the dividend for the next half year, should be five per cent. The motion was seconded by a Proprietor, whose naive we could not learn. Mr. YOUNG pressed an answer to the question which he had put, as to the declaration of the dividend. The Crratemax said, he could only state, that the Court of Directors thought proper, after a mature con sideration of the present state of their affairs, to pro )sose a dividend of 4 per cent. The Court of Directors, undoubtedly, had not the power of looking into futurity, rc tlr. Youeo asked whether there were no minutes or olutions entered into by the Directors be fore the y un dertook so important a measure? The Cumosua repeated his former answer. Mr. GUNDRY addressed the Court upon his last mo tion, arid regretted that the regulations would-not per tint Counsel to be heard in their behalf, or he would have given special retainers to the first lawyers in. the kingdom to plead for those obects. - A PROPRIETOR asked the C hairmal whether the Re- I solution for the proposal of the dividend of 4 per cent. to the Proprietors had been agreed to unanimously in the Court of Directors . ? A DIRECTOR here rose, and protested against such questions. He had no hesitation in answering, that this dividend had been agreed to unanimously, but he must say that such questions strictly ought not to be put— ' (General cries of " Certainly not.") Mr. YOUNG said, he was perfectly willing to waive his request for the production of the minutes of the Court of Directors until the next Court day. The CHAIRMAN again declared that the dividends were proposed only after the most mature deliberation. A PROPRIETOR objected to this colloquial mode of conducting the business of the Court. Another PROPRIETOR defended it as a means of ob taining information. The CHAIRMAN denied that there was any wish to stifle inquiry. Another PROPRIETOR rose, and deprecated the prac tice of rendering inquiry useless, by withholding pro per information. The CHAIRMAN said, he believed it was never known that the accounts were submitted to the Court of Pro prietors. The Governor and Court of Directors were determined in their proceedings by the ballot, which had invariably sanctioned their practice. Mr. GURNEY (the Barrister) observed, that the Court of Directors said, " we in our discretion think that this dividend ought to be declared." This discretion had been sanctioned by numerous Courts, and was not yet questioned by a decision upon any measure. So long as the divid.tids were large, the Proprietors were content , and merry, but when they were reduced, the Proprie-' tors began to change the posture of their features and to grumble. He had the same confidence as before in the Directors. ' The amendment that the Dividend should be five per cent. was then negatived by a large majority, and the original motion was carried. The Court then broke up. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. Yesterday, John Osborn and Joseph Wynter were in dicted, the former for stealing, on the 26th of June, a truss of hay, value two shillings, the property of George Byng, Esq. M.P. and the latter for receiving the same, knowing it to be stolen. George Conway, a constable of the parish of Isling ton, deposed, that on the morning of the 26th of June, at six o'clock, he saw two waggons, having the name of the prosecutor painted on the front, draw up at the door of the Archway Tavern, on the Highgate road. One of the teams was driven by the prisoner, and the other by a man named Smith. The prisoner, Wymer, who was ostler at the tavern, came out, and each of the wag goners delivered to him a truss of hay. The witness wrote to Mr. Byng, to inform him of the circumstance, and by the direction of that Gentleman, be obtained a warrant, and apprehended both the prisoners and the waggoner, Smith. The testimony of this witness was corroborated by that of another man who saw the transaction. John Smith, the waggoner, who was apprehended for the same offence for which the prisoner Osborn was tried, but was permitted to give evidence, deposed, that he and Osborn sold the hay which they left to the ostler. Mr. Byng deposed, that he never authorised Osborn to sell any hay to Wymer. Osborn had been in his ser vice for fifteen years. The Jury found the prisoners Guilty, but recom mended Osborn to mercy. The RECORDER observed, that he had reason to be lieve that Osborn had been induced to commit the crime of which he had been convicted by the persuasion of Wymer, and as Mr. Byng had expressed himself wil ling to take him into his service again, the Court was , disposed to deal mildly with him, and would therefore sentence him to only three days imprisonment. It was; however, necessary to make an example of the receiver; and the sentence upon Wymer, therefore, was, that he' should be imprisoned for six months, and once publicly whipped for 200 yards, near the Archway Tavern. R. Chandler was indicted for stealing a silver table spoon, the property of the Duchess Dowager of Rutland. The RECORDER said, that the prosecutrix was not properly described in the indictment ; her name as well , as her title ought to have been set forth, for there might be twenty Dowager Duchesses of Rutland. Hi there fore directed the Jury to acquit the prisoner, which the Jury accordingly did. CUTTING AND MAIMING. John Hoban, a young man in a baker's dress, was in dicted capitally for maliciously cutting and initialing William Henry Wetton, with intent to kill and murder him, or to do him some other grievous bodily harm. The prosecutor stated, that he *as in the employ of James Burnett, a baker, in 'Thantes-street, and was so on the 9th of September. He knew the prisoner a fort night previous to the' 9th of Septeitsber; the prisoner came to his Master's, and asked for employakent. The prisoner assisted for three nights, and did not afterwards come to work as usual. He returned on the Tuesday evening, the 9th of September, and then resumed his work, telling his master he had been at Highgate; wit ness found him in the bakehouse at about half-past eleven. Witness asked him what made hied g o away? and his answer was, that he did not like to trouble his master. Witness then went to work, and offered the prisoner an apron, for him to assist in making the doagh. The prisoner raid, " No, make it yourself," Witness, and Robins, his fellow-workman, then made the-dong‘i and le afterwards said to' the prisoner, " John, daft think you are ieiy fend of work: tha t won't do for as,. for in London bakers work very hard:' The prisoner said he liked work very well: Thai was all that passed Witness then jumped np upon the board, and began tO eat some meat. Witness said; " Jcihri; will you have some Meat?" The prisoner expressed his thanks, and todc part of the meat. They ate and drank together . The prisoner then wished witness tO lie down; mtd told him he would watch time for him. tiaidhe did not wish him to sit up, as he should be sure td wake. Witness at length acceded to the proposal. The prig loner asked what time he shotdd call him? and witness( said at half-past two. Witness accordingly "lan' dotin about one ; and want to sleep. He slept a 460 twenty minutes past two, and he was awakiaed some person' cutting his thine. It was quite dark.-4 Witness's fellow-Servant, Sohlt'llnbins; was there. Witi ness got up and Jumped'sjimist some person who kepi cutting at him. He put-Ws hansd up to his throat, and felt the blood, and the wohndh He then received a cat on the hand. Be . Called'ista " Murder !" and struggled with the prisoner very hail He knew it Was. the pH. saner with whdm he was struggiing, ancrnot Itobins.4-;• He knew it by the feel of his body. At length witness threw him down, and felt the prisoner had a razor in his hand. Witness took it away from him, and slightly cut hii fingers. The prisoner appeared to be catching his breath very hard. Witness tried to get out of the bakehouse by the steps, and the prisoner tried to puU him down. The prisoner made a second attempt, and put his hand to his neck, which was cut, to tear the wound open. Witness threw the trap door open with his head. He kept crying oat " Murder," and the pri soner said nothing. •Wituess's master then came with a candle. Before his master came, he could see it was the prisoner. The prisoner went into the bakehouse, and that was the last witness saw of him. In a few minutes the prisoner was secured, and brought back by the watch man. Being asked by his master how he came to do it? he said he did not do it, and was only teaching for the razor over his (witness's) head to cut his nails. He added, that after he had cut his nails he turned round to put it up, but it fell down and cut his (witness's) throat. John Robins was in the employ of Mr. Burnett, and recollected the 9th of September. Wetton and witness slept in the same room, and about half-past ten, the pri soner was in the bakehouse. Wetton asked witness to make the dough with the prisoner, and he declined.— The dough was afterwards made by Wetton and wit ness. They then went together to have some supper.— Witness then described what has already been stated by the first witness. He added, that he was awakened by Wetton's drying out " Murder !" NVitness said, " Wh.tt is the matter—are you mad ?" He thought Wetton had had a dream. Wetton said, " For GOD'S sake, master, come down, for lam murdered." He called out " Murder !" several times. The master presently came down in his shirt with a light. He then per ceived that it was the prisoner who was struggling with Wetton. The prisoner then made off. Witness heard him crawl among the coals and go into theback yard. Witness followed the prisoner, and found him there.— He was brought into the shop, and charged with the crime. He said he did not go to do it ; that he was paring his nails with a razor, and he was putting it up again, and it fell on Wetton's neck. At supper, witness, Wetton, and prisonerhad three pots of beer among them. Examined by the Jury.—The razor was without a handle. When the witness heard the cry of " Mur der!" he was frightened, and could give no assistance. Wetton's neck was uncovered on the night it took place. Bartholomew Candler, a patrol of Castle-Baynard Ward, heard the cry of " Murder !" on the night in question, and went to Mr. Burnett's shop. Mr. Burnett was down stairs. He heard a voice say—" He has cut my throat with a razor." Witness stood, at the door to prevent any one froM coming ont. He then heard that the prisoner was in the bakehouse. He went there, and found no one. He went into the yard, and found him there. He brought him into the shop. Wetton was covered with blood, and at the time said, " That the man." Upon being questioned, the prisoner said he had found the razor in a box in the bakehouse, and that it had fallen from his hands as he was cutting his nails. The razor was in the shop, and witness took it up, and said he would take care of it. He assisted the prosecutor to the Hospital. Examined by the Jury.—The prisoner's, hands and clothes were bloody. James Burnett, a baker, of Thames-street, said these persons were in his employ. At half-past two on the morning of the 9th of September, he was awakened by cries of " Murder." He got up, took a light, and went to the bakehouse. At the top of the stairs he saw Wetton, who cried out, " Hogan has cut my throat while asleep upon the boards." Hogan was behind. Witness said, " You villain, how came you to do it?" He did not remember that the prisoner made any answer, and wit. ness pushed him down stairs. The prisoner was ulti mately taken into custody. Mr. Hurlock, a surgeon, was called to attend the pro- 1 secutor. He found the gash on the throat was a long superficial wound. There were other wounds in other parts of the body. He did not observe any particular lacerations. It did not appear that these wounds had been caused by any accidental cause. The wound on the neck might occupy a full third of the whole neck. The prisoner, in his defence, said, that 'he took the Mira* oat of the box to cut his nails. In throwing itirp fell upon the neck of the prOtecilb*. Ihrletipt off, "the board, and knocked out the Candle with= hiis head : bit Made a grasp at it, and caught hold of it; and then An it fall. 'The prisoner called no witnesses to fact or character. . ' tIl The Costmou StaltANT shortly summed agralthe Jot?, and recapitulated the evidence. ,:). The Jury, withont hesitation, found-a vertSetrgGeity. SCI 'COURT. The Circuit Court of Justiciary was opened Ayr' on Saturday the fitli inst. by the Hoer. Lord Succour. The first case was that of Alexander Smith, who was accused of killing James Hamilton while fighting; he pleaded Not Guilty. It appeared fiom the eviaeiice that the decensed- was very quarrelsome, and that he got his death from falls. The.Advocate-Deplete deserted, the case, and he !Was found Not Gliiky: James Alder- . son, David alai; Margaret Margasit Andes = son, Were Charged With murdering John . M , Ltire; as he, was returning to AYr from Ochiltree - sacrimein, but owing to some error in the indictment, the diet lilts . de-, wiled, and they were committed On .nneW vistrfant. • James Yourg, weaver, Kilwinning; i.a4 &Sine gni* o assaulting, with' attempt to ravish, 11fary Muir, and sen tenced to sic months itoprisomnent. Wns. from Elgin, was indicted for seve ral acts of forgery, particularly for having, in courbe of this yetr, purchased, or pretended to purchase, the Cra 'Mond iron-works, from Messts:W.Cadell, Sons, and CO. of Edinburgh, for the price of 8;0751. sterling, and forged the name of his Grace the - Dite of Gordon to a letter of guarantee for 3;00111. of that sum, it having been stipulated, that before getting posiession of the Works, he should make a partial p-aytnent to that esi tent ; and for having forged the name of runes Brodie, of Brodie, to a &aft of 2201. and traintnitted the same `to Mr. A. Births; W:S.'with a view 4f' Obtaining a suns ,ilf money - horn hint. The - inclictnierit,hirking been read, Mfr. Grant of Rothienntrihns stated, • that there 'were 'Weevil parts of the prisoner's conduct, besidei the acts now charged against him, which afforded 'a strong'Pre r sumptiou that he was •not of a sound mind ; and ad.A duced Dr. Hugh Fraser .? of Inverness, yap swore as opinion, that M'Gilliyray was, unfit pa pliad to the iffJ dictment. The Court therefure Ordered the prisoner to be transmitted to Elgin, and the Court remitted to .two medical Gentlemen there to etamine him, and repots on,the'state of . c his mind to the High Court of Jitsti, - iau7 in Novettiber •v ' joke Peddle:on; *coned of areault, wit it4tor!ltoon- . 4iritea•rsifin,-sentence sis Months impsiswatusitylipThis trial was proceeded in with closed doors, • ' • POLICE INTELLIGENCE. BOW-STREET New Mona ov Raturossia Onus.—Williameiles, a good-les s iw. young man, was brought before Sir Menem, BIRNIZ from S L ,d er ! tin's watch -house yesterday, charged with having made ontra tr , w love to Mrs. Rose Smith—a very decent sort of body, who is Ir v, to one Mr. George Smith, who is a smith by profession. Mrs. Rose Smith was purchasing plums at a stall in St. Hant s .,. lane, on Monday evening, and whilst she was there Mr. Gik-s yew up and purchased some also. Mr. Giles was quite a stranger to Mo. Rose Smith, and to her very great surprise he seemed disposed 4 make very free with her—" much more free than welcome," though' she admitted that "he looked like a very nice young man, s b a rather tonic-Wert in liquor." He began with asking her " Wig y ej take some green gages, my love?" " No, Sir," said she, " tI A gage I'm not green enough to take green gages from a strasge 1 when I have plenty of my own !" " Will you go to the boweros, darling ?" said Mr. Giles. " No Sir," said Mrs. Rose Smith, g have a husband of my own, and need'nt be beholden to you—l shag you !" But Mr. Giles was not to be thus put off, he was " a i u g i wooer" if not a " thriving" one, and seizing Mrs. Rose Smith b y her " sedates," he rudely thrust her against the wall and swore b e would make her kiss him. In short, as she said, he used her sha me . fully ; and, to crown all, when she shrieked aloud for help, b e d rew forth a constable's staff, flourished it over her head, told her he fts a Bow-street officer, and, dragging her away to the watch-house, 4, endeavoured to prevail upon the watch-house-keeper to lock het i for the night as a disorderly woman. But, unluckily for Mr. G,,„ the watch-house-keeper saw through the matter at once, and, d e priving Mr. Giles of the baton he had so ungallantly misused, he signed him to a cell, and suffered Mrs. Rose Smith to go in peso. These things having been detailed in evidence, the captured 4, 4 •was laid before Sir Mesta an, and the following colloquy took O a between him and Mr. Giles—who answered the queries put to him _ as coolly as if there was nothing at all the matter Pray, Sir, how came you by this staff ?—I had it from the I Office. I belong to the dismounted horse patrol. Indeed ! and where is your station 7-0 o Barnes Common. . . . And what brought you in St. Martin's-lane ?—I was off duty. With leave?— Without leave. And drunk F—And drunk, your Worship. Very well—said Sir RICHAILD • you wilt find bail for the assaik upon this woman, and I shall ta kel care that you no longer Wog to the dismounted patrol, nor to any other. Mr. Giles was then removed by the jailer ; who having lecke( him up, reported to his Worship that Mr. Giles said, " things 101 turned out just to his wish, for he was tired of patrol duty, sit had long wanted to cut it." Prcnroexer.—John Tatnis—a costermonger out of place — N o charged with abstracting a silk handkerchief front the pocket of 31t. ' Robert Scanlan, the artist, as that Gentleman was leaving Haymarket Theatre, on Wedr.esday evening. Mr. Scanlan felt somebody fumbling at his pocket, and turni4 suddenly round, be saw his handkerchief in the prisoner's had, but It passed away through half a dozen other hands in an inituns. technically, it was cleverly ding'd—and Mr. Scanlan had not left for it but to seize the prisoner and hand hint over to thewatti The prisoner, when asked by Sir Rickman whether he had aa thing to say? replied, " Lou. bless you, Sir ! how can you think knows anything about the geniman's hankcher. There was awe gang of the most notoriousest thieves in London there, and soy 'cm was as likely to take the hankeher as what I was." " No doubt of it"--said Sir RICIIIIII3 ; and committed him t take his trial at the next Westminster Sessions. QUEEN-SQUARE. Yesterday, a young Lady came to the Office in a flood of tear and blood streaming profusely from her. She said she was paaisj through Old Pie-street, when a fellow, who stood at the doorof a house, called out his dog and set it at her: the dog bit her is ibs thigh, and would have torn the part away, only for some perste who came to her assistance. The Magistrate inquired whether she gave the man any proves' cation, or whether she was sure he set the dog at her wantonly ant' maliciously ? The young Lady said, she - had not even spoken to him until dog bit her thigh ind tore her severely. The Magistrate advised her to go home and have the part dressed in the first instance ; and then, if she pleased, a warrant would bt ,witted against the offender; but her best mode of proceeding would be by preferring an indictment against him, or by an anise when, no doubt, she would obtain damages. MARY -LA-BONNE_ • J. Scan, was re-examined on a charge of brutal treatment told wife; when Mr. Lucas, a surgeon, stated, that on examining person, he discovered eleven wounds or stabs on her arms, bream temples, wrists, hands, and head, produced by a blunt instrument seine of the wounds were most extensive, and he could not antenna bar out of danger. —Mrs. Scott was then supported into the Act lose head was bound up, and her left arm was in a sling, and sh eras so weak from tom of blood, as to be almost unable to meal Being allowed to sit down, she said, that on Monday morning hi she attended at the Sessions House, Clerkenwell, to prefer, in cm sequence of the prisoner's excessive brutality, articles of t he pew against him. Having done so, and be being, as a matter of indi ginice,only held in his own recognizance, she quitted the Connoil proceeded to one or two places she had to call at, and in the ems bag was on her return to her cousin's, on Portland-lawn, whelk, a she was crossing the Regent's Park, she met her hushand (thole , 'miler). Be seized her by the throat, and nearly shoaled her called to him to go away, as she did not want to ste or speak tolls and being apprehensive he was going to cut her throat, she cavils 'hold'of his hand, when he said, with an oath," I have not got a kilt now, but I will murder you on this spot." He then struck here 'the temple, she thonght with a key, and he repeated the blow; 'the felt the blood melting down her face, and she screamed it assistance, and fell down ; he still continued to stab her, and' being no longer able to tesiet; lust her senses. The remainder/ 'the poor sibm'an's Statement Vizi what occurred subsequent to th time spoken to by the witnesses. The prisoner's features, ai proceeded; became fixed NI a sullen grin. He nude no attemplil 'sped, except once, when he muttered. " The b—h has sealed!( 'fate; I wish had killed her!" and then, trembling with rage, di " There was a gendemad dressed in black, who saw the wise; :wish be was called; my wife is kept, and lives with him." Bart of the witnesses said, there was no person there at all ; it was al , faleg--41e was committed under Lord Eilenborough's Act. "• - A vessel of oysters arriving at liiga from England, 1814, - threat the officers of the Custom-house into du greatest distress. These things could not be cubicle/. for they were not manufactured articles, neither was they admissible as colonial produce; many, tbCrefOl% were-the difficulties that arose on this knotty point, 24 :*anions communications passed to and fro between de department of the Interior and the Custom - house. L os t before the final adjustment of the question. the dispuul cargo became putrid, and was thrown away. The polio officers, who, some years agO. when it was forbidden ID appear in the streets without carrying a lantern, arrestei a Gentleman because his servant carried it for him, dig not commit an error of more punctilious absurdity... James's iravels. • THE RIGHT OF SINGING —Archbishop Becker db serves, that " though the first Christians made sioging a to part of their worship, and the whole Congregation idled is Ai 0 afterwards the singers by profession, who had bees ptitarridi pointed to lead and direct them, by degrees usurped the wityli ati C; fonnance ; but at the Reformation the People were roared rights." - BIRTH. • • ' Sept.; at Kilbryde Castle, Lady Campbel l,_ o f s MARRIED. Sept. 9, at Brecign, Monsieur L'Apollinaine relkestoollail i t rine, youngest daughter of the late John Sies...let. • DIU. On the 15th uhimo, at the house of his•on-ia-law , Mr. E. arigh St. James's, the celebrated philosophical chemist mid tuittlaillik Mr. Matthew Valle. aged 91, a native of Ftaace• first who mmttfaatured factitious alum at heel, Deg ""' the first in this couutry who made oxymtribitle acid ps for IV Of Poses of bleaching, Dublin Waterford . uernsey and Jersey Lisbon Hound &kW tifOli-VATta, - 1 1— LILS.— I .. -- a • 111111. DV*. 1 0 Ilf11)Ct 1 0 14alubur0 O 1 Fl4n4cri ko 0 Matta Co 1 Gottanbutjb O 0 Amerke4 ,', at LONPON-4RI] MGrtiong ernilti, #lll, al! /:;I ) / 1 2 , 9. -F' Ppm. !L 2 mu Cutup attlit j I poKi. friutettPuNlihid by LIONO• IWIMI M/4411 • TPROPPF: