Star. — London, England, 1814-03-11 00:00:00

ON THE DEATH OF LORD MONTGOM.EFUE, 1814. ..,_ ? I i I • ! i Roll on, dark Axr, thy troubled stream, 'I by murmuring falls and broken flow ' Accord with Sorrow's hapless theme, Congenial with the tone of Woe I Far trom thy rocky banks and bowers, Where libeenian breezes rise, 'Midst grey Lucencia's frowning towers, By suaogers wept, MONTCOMERIX lies. And whs. .nrnov',.l shall name that naive ? And who unmov'd that name shall hear ? What bosom shall reface a sigh ? What eye repress the starting tear ? His was the mien and manners bland, That Friendship met with soft return; is a spirit to command, That might have blaz'd o'er Otterbure. The sordid though ennobled knave, May shrink in scowling night from scorn, But Honour's son the gaze may dare, And rise resplendent with the morn. Sad are the scenes we deem'd so gay, On Fairs green margin, lonely now! And melancholy tunes the lay Of every warbler on the bough. And last the hopes of happier days! Ah! Recollection's pangs are there ! But Winter comes, the leaf decays, And wither'd are the banks of Ayr! R4:11 on, dark Ayr, thy troubled stream, Thy murmuring falls and broken . flow, Accord with Sorrow's hapless theme, Congenial with the tone of Woe ! • Where his ancestors took Earl PEROT prisoner. Ayrshire, March 1. A. I. DWEL.-A meeting took place, a short time since, Alnwick Town-moor, between two medical Gen kemen of that place. The ground being measured , the seconds (fourteen paces), the parties took their Imes, and fired two rounds without effect, when the seconds interfered, and the matter was amicably set -tied. It is said, the misunderstanding took place about the treatment of a patient they were attending. Did the patient escape as well ? A few days since the driver of a cart, belonging to Mr. Farmer, ironmonger, of St. John's -street, was thrown the refrom, by the wheel coming in contact with a post, and so much hurt that he expired in a ft w h'urs. GUILDHALL.—J. Hale was yesterday charged by T. Redman, a bargeman, with a breach of contract. The complainant stated, that he had engaged with the prisoner, at Wallingford, to navigate his barge to London and back again ; but when the barge was laden and ready to proceed, the prisoner deserted from b;s post, and refused to return, having obtained more money than was due to him from his master. This bang a practice extremely prevalent among barge men on the River, it was thought proper by way of example, to take the prisoner into custody. The Al derman reprobated the conduct of the prisoner in the strongest terms ; but, upon his solemnly promising to return to his employer, he was discharged. HATTON GARDEN.—Yesterday W °read was re. examined, charged on suspicion of 4realing a money. box, containing a 8203 in cash and bank notes, out of she bar of the Angel Inn, Islington, the property of Mrs. Derrick, the landlady ; but the evidence being defective, he was committed for further examination. UNION HALL.—Simmons, the Jew, who has already been several times examined, charged with defrauding ♦arious publicans of different sums of money, by sell ing them watches at more than double or treble their value, under false representations, was again brought up yesterday. Several new charges, similar to those already detailed, were preferred against him, and he was fully committed for trial at the Assizes. MARLBQROUGH-STREET.—A hackney coachman, named Anes, was charged with extorting more than his fare. He had been hired to go from Drury-lane Theatre on Tuesday to Berkeley-square, for which he demanded ss. His proper fare was tendered, but he persisted in the extortion and received it. He was fined 40s. arid costs. • A rarmer from Essex had his pocket picked of .000 in Bank notes awl checks, in Whitechapel, on Wednesday last. The light-fingered gentry were extremely busy on the Coal Exchange, on Wednesday last : a coal-mer chant from Chelsea lost his note-case, with 1150 Bank-notes. The coach-house of Mr. T. Bum, distiller, in Fore street, Limehouse, was broke open on Wednesday night, rind three .chariot-glasses, a box -coat, and the hammer-cloth, carried off. Wednesday morning the house of Mrs. Devines, of Arabella-row, Pimlico, was robbed of property to a considerable amount, by the following stratagem : On the afternoon of Tuesday a young man, of decent appearance, who said his name was Jones, and that his father was a respectable tradesman, residing in the Minories, applied to Mrs. Devines to hire her first floor, which was to be let. Having agreed for price and other particulars, he said he should come that evening, and in the mean time referred Mrs. Devines to his lather. He said he should come home that night, and desired to have a fire lighted in the dining room against his return. About nine o'clock he ar . rived in a hackney-coach, bringing with him a large bundle, which he said contain: clothes. Previous to his going to bed he told Mrs. Devines he should be under the necessity being at his office, in the neigh bourhood of Whitehall, soon after six in the morning, Ate would not therefore be surprised if she hea-d him go out early, and desired his breakfast might be ready by nine 'o'clock. Abopt* six o'clock Mrs. Devines heard the door open and shut, but took no notice of it, supposing her new lodger was gone opt, as he said be should, but on the servant going into the apartment to get his breakfast ready, she soon discovered he had rut gone empty hanch.d, for amongst other articles which had disappeared with him, were a large pier glass, the dining-room carpet, the window-curtains, the sheets, blankets, pillow-cases, and various other ar edless to add that Mr. Jones did not ,akfast, nor bas any diligence used on Devines enabled her to discover the lathcr in the Minories. The large by Mr. Jones the-night before, was opening it, its contents were found of old rags, pietei of old carpet, and equal value. LAW INTELLMENCt .. COURT OF CHANCERY; MARCH le. GALLINI V. GALLINI. The motion in this case, by which the Defendant, Mr. Gallini, sought to have his two children delivered overinto hiscustody, standingiover to this day, the mo ther, accompanied by the children, and also the other parties interested, attended in Court. Sir SAMUEL ROMJLLY stated to his Lordship, that he understood an affidavit had been filed on. &le part of the Plaintiffs this . morning. If that affidavit were meant to be used, the case must stand over till to. morrow, in order to enable his client to see it, and if necessary, to answer it. Mr: HART said he was 'instructed, on the part of Sir Edward Perrott, to state how much that Gentle man felt hurt at the representation which bad been made to his Lordship, of an improper interference having taken place on his part, with the view of ob structing the service of the process of that High Court. He begged to assure his Lordship that no thing could have been more remote from his inten tion, and he felt extremely hurt that conduct should have been imputed to him so unbecoming his situa tion in life. Mr. WATKINS, Solicitor for the Defendant, said he 'had an affidavit stating exactly the contrary. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY had no objection to the mo tion standing over, the other party undertaking to have the children in .Court at the time the 113 ()Lion should come on. The LORD CHANCELLOR suggested the propriety of fixing the hour, that to mother and children might not be kept waiting all day in Court, as they had been on the present occasion. Mr. HART submitted ifAr. Watkins, on perusing the affidavit now filed, shotild find that it would be necessary for him to answer it, that it would be pro per in him immediately to communicate that fact to his (Mr. Hart's) client, that the mother and children in this case might not be subjected to the necessity of attending till such time as the motion was ready for discussion. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY understanding that Mr. Wa tkins deemed it indispensible, from the nature of the affidavit filed, as its contents had been generally jai:. parted to him, that an answer should be made to it, proposed that the matter should lie over to this day se'nnight, the other party undertaking to produce the children in Cowl on that day. Mr. HART had po objection to this, Mr. Watkins giving to his clients copies of such affidavits as lie should file in answer, or putting them on the file in such time as to afford to his clients an opportunity of taking copies of the affidavits, and replying to them if they thought proper. He was instructed to say, that there was every ditosition, on the part of his clients, to have the whole matter in dispute brought fully under the eye of his Lordship. Sir SAMUEL R.O . MILLY said that disposition had al ready been fully shewn in the conduct of Mr. Hart's clients hitherto. The motion accordingly stands for this day se'nnight. READING ASSIZES, WEDNESDAY, MARCH 9. WHATMAN V. WHATMAN. This was an issue, directed out of the Court of Chancery, for trying the sanity or insanity of a per son of the name of Robert Whatman, 4eceased. It appeared that the person, the soundness or un soundness of whose mind was the question at issue, had acquired certain estates by the wills of his mo ther and of his aunt, and had also succeeded to cer tain other estates, held by his mother in lee simple, as heir-at-law to her. These estates, amounting in the whole to about 50 acres of land, Robert What man, in the year 1785, sold to another person, also of the naive of Whatman, but in nowise related to him, for the sum of £llO, and for an annuity of 52 guineas a-year, or one guinea per week, to be paid to him during his life. Robert Whatrr. Jr' died some years ago, and the present Plaintiff, his brother, and heir-at-law, filed a bill in equity against the son and representative of the purchaser, from Robert What man, and a person of the name of Dickenson, who had acquired right to part of the property fromWhat man, the original purchaser, seeking to set aside the whole of those transactions, on the ground that Ro bert Whatrnan, from whom the father of the present Defendant had acquired the property, had during the whole of his lifetime been in a state of idiotcy or insa nity, so as to render him incapable of making a valid sale or conveyance of his estate. The trial of the issue which the Lord Chancellor had directed for settling this point, commenced on Tuesday, went on dining the whole of that day, re commenced on the Wednesday morning, and lasted till past ten at night. On the part of the Plaintiff, about forty witnesses were examined, all of whom swore to a variety of facts" and circumstances in the conduct and behaviour of Robert Whatnan, going to chew i iiotism, excen tricity, or insPrify, in all his actions. They swore that he was in the constant habit of writing uncon nected and unmeaning sentences, with chalk, on the floors or on the walls ; that lie would also frequently write with a pen a number of words joined together in unconnected sentences, some of which were pro duced ; that his convertation was like his writuig, silly, idiotical, and unintelligible : that lie sometimes got himself intoxicated, and seemed less an idiot when in that state than when he was sober ; that he was often heard to mutter sullen and incoherent threats and denunciations against his relations, threat ening, at one time, himself to, kill them ; at another time, expressing a conviction that they would be kill ed, and ;bat they deserved to be so ; that he at one time conceived an antipathy against a tree, and said that he would havelt hanged for running against him ; that he would frequently* boil his pork and greens in a tea-kettle, rather than in a pot or pan ; and that his appearance, manners, and conduct, were always most beastly. For the Defendants, on the other hand, the will of the mother and of the aunt of RobertWhatman were given in evidence, from which it appeared that each of these persons, two of his nearest relatives, and the most likely to know whether he was or was not of sane mind, made over their estates to him, and to the heirs of his body. A deed executed by the present plaintiff, too, the brother of Robert Whitman, by waich, in the event of Robert's surviving him, he made over certain estates belonging to him, to Ro bert, and the heirs of his body, was also given in 'evidence ; from all of which, thetounsel for the de. fendants contended. it appeared that each of these near relations, including the present plaintiff himself, had, of the dates of those respective deeds, at leazt, given their unequivocal testimony to the sanity of Robert Whatman. Testimony was also given by a variety of witnesses as to his sanity from the year 1794, at which time he lived at Wareham, down nearly to the period of his death, though it appeared that at that time he was much given to drinking...— It also appeared in evidence that the deed of asmgn ,ment to the predecessor of the defendants was pre pared by a respectable solicitor, who had been, and still continued, the sulicitor employed by Robert Whatman's family. The Jury, after consulting for a considerable time, on the Thursday morning, returned a verdict tOr the Plaintiff, thereby establishing the insanity. GALLEN! V. VERROTT. his case, which is an action of trim. eon. brought by the Plaintiff against the Defendant, they being married to two sisters, stands over as a remnant, along with four or five others, till the next Assizes. ESSEX ASSIZES.—CHELMSFORD, MARCH 9. O • t . f • • 1 ' 1 • 1 • A 1 • 1 by Fla sec the sheets, blankets tides. It is nerd] come home to breal the pan of Mts. 13 residence of his fa bundle brought in lot behind,,but on to consist wholly o b cher rubbish ()leg ; 'so • STEPHENS V. MARSHALL. Mr. Serjeant BEST stated, that this was at; action of trover to recover the value of a quantity of stained glass, which the defendant had carried off from Steeple Bumpstead Church in this county. He was sorry to say that the defendant was a clergyman, and although at all times he was willing to speak with the utmost respect of that sacred order, )et, in the present case, he must say, that the conduct of the defendant had brought disgrace upon his order. The plaintiff in this case waste the churchwarden of the parish, and in the. year 1812, the chancel of the church undergoing repair, three stained glass win dows were taken down, and the glass carefully put by. On this occasion the plaintiff entered the church, and having examined the glass, actually sent his ser vant, and took away a considerable part. To prove this caso the workmen were called, who proved that Mr. Marshall, when the glass was placed in the chancel on a chest, came and examined it, and sorted out a figure of the Virgin and Infant Jesus, and the Arms of the Beudish's, which were part of the chancel tvindow. For the defendant it was contended, that he took the glass home only for safe custody, and that the whole of it was returned upon request. But on cross-examination it did not appear that the whole was returned.—Verdict for the plaintiff—Damages Twenty Pounds. DOE d. WELLESLEY V. WRIGHT. This was an action of ejectment brought byW. L. Wellesley, Esq. of Wanstead House, against the de fendant, G. Wright, to recover the possession of Rcchford Hall Farm, in this county. It appeared that a similar action had been tried at the last Assizes, when, from the omission of some formality, the plain tiff was non-suited. Mr. MAnity AT, for the plaintiff, stated the follow ing circumstances, which he afterwards proved : The defendant, Mr. Wright, had held the farm in 'question, consisting of between six and seven hun dred acres, of the Tilney Long family, under a lease which expired in 1810. A negociation was entered into between the defendant and Mr. Bullock, who was agent for the landlord, for it renewal of the lease, and no terms being agreed upon, Mr. Bullock con sented that the defendant should remain in possession for a year, at the advanced rent of 1000 guineas, and that if he had a lease fur a term, the rent should be £llOO, or if he remained' tenant from year to year, he should pay the 1000 guineas. Mr. Weight objected to the rent of £llO9, but coitinued to hold fi um Michaelmas, 1810, to Michaelmas, 1811, at the rent of 1000 guineas. The plaintiff married Miss Ta ney Long in the early part of March, 1812, and gave a general authority immediately after to Mr. Trebeck, kis steward, to give notice to all the tenants to quit their farms. A notice was accordingly given to Mr. Wright to quit at the following Micnaelmas, which, however, he refused to do Negociatiora continued for a lease, which came to nothing, the defendant ob jecting to the terms. An ejectment was accordingly brought, which failed at the last Assizes ; but, in order to be quite secure, Mr. and Mrs. Wellesley had joined in a second notice to quit without waving the former notice. The present ejectment proceeded upon both notices, and a case being quoted by Mr. Mar ryit to show that, notwithstanding the second notice, the plainti ff was entitled to proceed upon the first also, _ _ Mr. Serjeant BEST saiel, that having taken care on the part of Mr. Wright, that the plaintiff Lad properly proved all the facts of his case, he conic' not resist a verdict against his client. Verdict for the plaintiff. TILE KING V. MATTIIEWS. Mr. Serjeant BEsr stated, that this was a prosecu tion instituted by the postmasters general against the defendant, who was in the employ of the post-office to deliver letters from the receiving house at Cogges hall, in this county, for a misdemeanour in altering the postage mark of the letters, in general to .double _the amount, with the intention of applying tit:: extt a postage to his.own use. The learned Seljeant said it was a fortunate circumstance for the defendant that the frauds were committed in the case of a gentleman with whom Matthews settled for the postage once. a quarter only, and that he had been detected before the day of settlement had arrived, as otherwise he would have been guilty of felony in receiving the money ; whereas now the offence amounted only to a misdemeanor. The facts of the case were, that a clergyman of the name of • Mant, who had several pupils at his house, in consequence of which letters from various parts of the country came to him for his pupils, had several times observed that the single rate of postage was obliterated, and the double substitut ed, and that the ink, when the letters were delivered, was frequently pale, and became blacker is the course of the day. This induced him, as the letters turned out to be only single letters, to suppose that all was not correct, and he wrote to Mr. Fteeling, the Secre tary to the Post-office, on the subject. An inquiry was accordingly set on foot, and on an investigation with the defendant, the hitter admitted the tact of altering the postage, and expressed his contrition for the offences. Justice, however, requited that this pro secution should be instituted, and it would be here ' after for the Court of King's Bench to decide on the punishment to be inflicted. `These facts being proved, Mr. GURNEY, for the de fendant, stated, that it was impossible fox him to alter the complexion of the offence of his client; but a ,proper period would hereafter arrive, when his eal)r repentance and contrition might be made avalh4b!e him, viz. when he should be brought up for judgracatt for his misconduct. The Jury immediately found him Guilty. BIR At Little Ilfurd, !Asset, the lady of the Rev. Mr. Collett, a son. At Greenock, cal Lady of I.leutenant-Colonel Cameron, dr the ;9th reginierajoi Cam.ron Highlanders) of a mm and her. At the Manse of IVlid-Calder, Mrs. Sommers, of a dauLit:r. last week, a poor woman is Chapel-street, Dumfries, wa, livered of *rev children. The mother Is doing well, but the children allOied on tine day last. DIED. At Dunn*, on the 2nth ult. in the Gist year of ker age, Mrs. Baird, relict Of the Rev. John Baird, late Minister of Dunning. Lately, in Dublin, Major Hein y Dernlott. At Tongue Mame, on the sth ult. in the 7th rear of her ar, Mrs. Jane Porteus, wile of the Rev. Wan. M`Kenzie, of Tongue. At Forfar, on the 20th ult. William Donald, A. M. 33 years parochial schoolmaster of that place. At the ReCtory of Croaton, the Rev. Win. Sanderson, M. A. formerly of St. John's College, Cambridge. Rev. Edward Spraed, Rector pf Brftway, county of Cork. The Rev. Henry St. John Mitchell, Vicar of Leed►-turn. Broomfield, Kent. WESSEL'S JESUITS DROPS. THE Genuine JESUITS DROPS have been long known and esteemed a safe, cheap, eflxtual, and often an immediate cure for Stranguaty, Gleets. Weakness of the Kid neys or Bladder; and when take.) on the first attack of l'en , :re .1 Infection, they will infal i.bll accent/ 14h the desired effect: should the complaint be far advanced, it will be necessary to take the Secciric fluter Dl' with the Jesuits Drops. '1 he great object to be attended to is, that Purchasers eheuld be careful in having the true and genuine Pse;laration, as th e safe and dangerous ccun;er‘.!ts attempted to be foisted un the Public, by absolute falsehood, are so numerous, that the 11:n -prietors request every Purchaser to ask for " Wessel's Jesuit's CAUTION.—The genuine iVesstes Je•.uit's Drops are in closed in a black stamp, with the tollowing engraved thcre (to secure the Proprietor from piracy) ; u E. Euwa s ns, 8 Jc cessors to J. %Vessel, 66, St. Paul's Church yard." May aito toe had of Mr. Sanger (late Bacon's), No, ISO, Oxford•street. Price 2s. 9d. per bottle, and in large bo.Cee, containin tea small LI. TO THOMAS TAYLOR, ESO. T BEr; leave to inform you, that ev er s i nce t h e year 1 1790,1 had been afflicted with the Lues Venerea, which from Its obstinately resisting every course of medicine prescribed by the most eminent of the faculty here, and undergoing severa/ severe courses of salivation and twice discharged from the Holpital, little relief, would appear to be of the most inveterate nature. In the spring of last year my disorder had got to such a !lead, as nearly to,put a period to my existence. In this state, I was rt.. commenired by Mr. J. Thompson, (who received so ,Teat a cure by them here,) to take your Leake's Patent Ping, which I b e gan ,to do on the 26tb Mav ; in the course of a fortnigh. I b. gut, rtceive benefit. he little. more than a month 1 became, by your liberal advice and medicine, perfectly free from my for. Mer complaints, have recovered my former spirits and strength, and am became jolly and fat, in whic:i state having continutd many months to the astonishment of all who knew me, I ant at a loss in what terms to express my gratitude, but beg you for the good of other suffering mortals, to make this my use as public as. possible, as I shall on every occasion—in pt doing you will greatly oblige, Sir, your grateful obedient very humble set. vant, ALEX. MURKER. Swan's Close, High-street, Edinburgh. Prepared and sold by tke sole Proprietor, Thomas Taylor; Member of the Royal College of Surgeons In London, at his houte No. 9, New Britlge,nreet. They are also sold by his appointment, at the Perfumer's, No. SS, St. Alban's.street, Pall Mall ; the Toy-shop, No. 403, Os. ford-street ; Mr. lltsborough's, N 0.7, Fish-street-hill, nearly - poshe the Monument ; and by cue person in every consider Axe town In Englaod, &c. in buses only 2s. 93. ea. o, @waled up with tull and plain directions, whereby persons ofelther sex may cure themselves with ease and sserecut N.B. Every Box sold in Great Britain to sealed up with a stamp hn whir h ,by favourot the Ct•inuiissiosiers, is primed at tite .racy► Office " C. Taylor, No.g, New Bridge-attest." MATRIMONY. - - - - NO Disorders have contributed more essentially to destroy. Hymeneal Happiness than those which are the consequeoce of unguarded pleasure. P.eopk of every r.o.k adoration to the Shrine of IVedlock, but where the Contitutton has been tainted by Diseaie, a renovation of Stability is indispai sably requisite. Treenty years have we devoted our practice to the exclusive treatment of the following Disorders, and the suc cessful result of our plan gives in; additional ardour to oppcse, as far as we are able, the ravages of tho=e Complaints which the most important in the catalogue of Human Infirmities. After initiation into every branch, as Navy Surgeons, we formed a wi.b, at an early period of practice, to rescue individuals from t;:e ig norance of uneducated men, or the equally dangerous precipitauci of general Practitioners. _ _ _ The Disorders to the cure of which we have devoted our at. tendon, comps+ e every specks of Venereal Infection; all kinds of Debility, whether arising from the habits of school boys, or the indulgencies of maturer age; that derangemslit of the System in Women, which is called Barrenness or Sterility, Seminal Weaknesses, Gleets, Obstructions in the Urethra; as also Strictures, whether rec.:nt or of long duration, and which have baffled the skill of other Practitioners, are by our present improved plan of treatment effectually and perms. neatly cured, without the pitient suffering the recruciating pain. ardalartning Hemorrhage which frequently tillows the Lion of the Lunar Caustic. In the course of our extensive practise in this metropolis, numerous cases of SI RIC! URES have tvica and are daily under our care, the total eradication of which is ei• 1 fected by a sate, certain, and expeditious mode (secure supette: to any other yet adopted. The weakness, relaxation, and lity, proceeding from this cuniplaint are speedily rem,oted. and the Patient restored to sound and vigorous health. But where the debility has for years existed, a proper perseverance in cot restiirr lye remedies is indispensably requisite, to reviveihe sluae berm; sparks of life, and to reanimate the constitution. Numerous Diseases are the result of ignorance el baste in the trt atinent of a simple Gonorrhea, amid it not *trequently pens that the seeds of life are poisoned by the tint 64:region of unguarded hour. By a superior method such complaints ge easily cured; and even w here others have tailed, we trust that we may presume to offer a radical ree;:stablishinent. Few, hose ever, are the cases of complicated distress in this disorder, core pared with the calamitous situation of men, who, front an nie!i.l , gerce in a solitary vice, or the prevalent gaieties of a fa diionals.e life, acquire that state of debility which is the unavoidable c-nse quence of such pernicious habits. Where the unhappy offer!' broods over his misery, but carefully conceals his misfortunes,: may be some consolation for lum to know, that although it he et Object of doubt or uncertainty with other Practitioners, the re moval of these deficiencies by the gradual progress of Iterovatioi , es the acquirement of our experience. If the rites of Batches Venus have heghti to lettuce manly s i gnor, much anidety Le prevented by an ear:y counteraction of this larguid in these cases no great diffictilry will occur. Married Women, who have l.mg been disappointe 2 in expectations of a flonily, may be assurod, that in nor; such defects are curable Ly Mettizal skill. The secrecy which is so eseittial to out undertakings an i • r4l qualifications width see have presumed to state, Pone: the 1 1515 of our pretensions. and iu COinCidellCe with such this intir..stoo is given, that Messrs. Currie and Co. may he c ,. .nqtritedll' l ' 6. tien i ts of either 6EI with the greatvt secrecy and bottom, at t: rd House, No. 10, liattoregarden. Patients in the Country are requested to P. 17r the of their caste, age, and general hiSit of living, and roe to 3r. mittance for advice and Medicines, whets the sante will LI. give. or sent to any part of the CURRIE and Co. Surgeel7fi, No. IE7, letton•L t:l7. September 3, ItilS. HIGIi•WA t Eit. A LONDON BRIDGE TO- MOILItCW; t v l°nr-r3 • • ... ......... 4 S mittturs a ver 5 Aft...roma « 3 :n'ntg es alter 6 _ • LON DQII4 : ?ratite:lb? Lava L KENT, Picket Place; ani rublidie4 there, and at tba btu ()lice, Twjp►e Dee. ft a I.