Star. — London, England, 1823-04-05 00:00:00

LICENSED VICTUALLERS' APPEAL. WESTMINSTER *SESSIONS. Yesterday the appeal of Mr. Stringer, the proprie tor of the Red Lion public-house, in the Strand, against the conviction by Mr. HALLS and Mr. MIN SHULL, the Bow-street Magistrates, upon the • info).- mation laid against him by Johnson, the common informer, for serving liquor after the hour specified in the Publicans Act, came on before a full bench of Magistrates. On the trench we observed Mr.CoNsT, the Chairman, Sir R. Bi !ma, Mr. 13Evn.r., Mr. Ra w MT. RAYNSFOHD, Mr. BAKER, Mr. WHITE, and Mr. MATTHEW. When the appeal was called on, Byers, the jour neyman informer, appeared, and being sworn, de posed, that his employer, Johnson, was so ill as to he unable to attend, and he therefore begged that Mr. Johnson's attendance might be excused. Mr. TAYLOR urged the necessity of the attendance vi" the principal informer as indispensable in support of the ca,e for the respondents. He also observed, that this plea of indisposition appeared to have been got up for the occasion, as the Solicitor in the appeal, being anxious to serve him personally with notice, and having called 'at his house late the night before, was told by his wife that he was not at home; an answer that had been given upon all previous appli cations of the same sort. Some of the - Magistrates concurred with Mr.TAT- Loa, that the personal attendance of the informer was indispensable. Mr. CoNsr, the Chairman, was however of a dif ferent opinion, and the objection was over-ruled. The record of the conviction being produced, Byers, as witness under the conviction, proceeded to substantiate the case. On his examination in chief, he deposed, that on the night of Monday the 13th of January he went into the Red Lion public.house at ten minutes after twelve, and saw at the bar fire men ai:d five women, one of whom was served with a glass of rum s% iLhout any hesitation. The Magistrate put the usual questions to the in former as to his iutciest in the conviction, but he de nied all share in the beneficial consideration which Johnson had in the successful resultolhis testimony. Ile swore that. whatever decision might follow upon his evidence, it made no difference with respect to itiS payment, as his salaiy for services fn laying in formations was fixed, and could not at all be affected by the success of his exertions. At this moment some strong disapprobation began to manifeq itself is the Court. • Dyers cross-esanlined by Mr. TAYLOR.—You say you were at the Red Lion at ten minutes after twelve? Yes.—Whcre were lon at twelve? At St. Clement's Church, where I heard the clock strike twelve.—Did you take ten minutes to walk from St. Clement's Church to the Bed Lion? I can't say as to ten mitmutc, but thereabouts ; it might be less.— Did )on go directly from St. Clement's Church to tie lied Lion alont- the Strand? NO, I went by some other stv.:ets.—Didyou go by the back ways? Yes. For what purpose? I wished to see whether there were any other houses open in that way.—Did you touch nom Drury-lane in your peregr ination? I be lieve I did —You'll swear it was not for the purpose of seeing whether the Theatres were over, and the people returning who were in the habit-of receiving rlficslinnent at the Red Lion belbre they went home? I didn't think of that. ,Don't you know. the Red Lion to be a.house for the reception of trreeller.O. I' believe. it is.—Have not you• seen coaches at die. door, after twelve at night, to take home people re tuning from tha Theatre?" I have seen coaches at the door.—Were there any stage-coaches at the door on the night in.question, at ten minutes after twelve? I saw one stage-coach at the door.—Can you swear that the people who received the refreshment did not' intend to go by that coach? I can't tell whetherufl not.—Did you go among them as a traveller ? I had no such intention.-1-low were you dressed? I . be-' lieve I was dressed as,' usually am.—By virtue of' your oath, wore you not dressed as a travepef ? I can't say.—Haln't you a drab great coat and Belcher handkerchief on, -as-travellers, going at Light, usually have? I had-that drets, Wt . did not mean to pass -as a traveller.—Dia not you mean to inveigle the landlord oT the Red Lion under that disguise?. I never intended to inveigle anybody—(4 laugh on the Butch and in tl:e body of the Court). — Will you swear that . ' you, never intended to deceive anybody in your vocation of infotmer ? I wish to state facts, and not to deceive.—You StatecLat Bow street, that you saw two women who received re freshment go out of the house, and not go by the coach ? Yes and one of them was a girl of the town. This is a neiv story-since you were at Bow -street; when there you never alluded tna girl of the town. At this moment it was discovered by one of the Magistrates that there Tres a technical objection to cvr.viction,• on the ground that thereeras a misnomer* os to the parisji. The informant not being able to prove is what parish the house was situated, the objection %bus considered fatal, and the conviction quashed. Mr. TAYLOR acknowledged theforce of the objec eon urged on the part of the Magistrates, and al lowed that the onus liy in .the informer in cases of locality to prove the limits; but he expressed his re gret that there was no opportunity of determining the ease on its own merits. A FALAI FRIED!-At the Westminster Sessions yesterday, Mary Hamm2nd was indicted for stealing a number of household articles, the property of a poor woman who was confined to her bed by illness, and whom the prisoner visited under the• pretence of aTording assistance. She ‘eas detected in committing the theft, and on the prosecutrix endeavouring to get back her property, the prisoner struck her a violent' blow in the face.—The case was clearly proved; and Chairman (F. CONST, E,q•) in passing judg c.ent, said, the case was one•of an aggravated na t,lre, and the sentence of the Court therefore was— • 4 That she should be imprisoned six calendar months, and kept to hard labour.` _ _ CIUMNEY-SWEEPERS.—Monday the Annual Din- Ler was given to the Climbing Boys, at Sheffield. Twenty-five boys were present, also one girl, ten years of age, whom the poverty of her parents induced to employ as au apprentice. She has bteri 12 months in the habit of ascending and sweeping dimnies daily I ASSIZES. • Z/NGSTON., FRIDAY, APRit 4. Several Speaial Jury causes were appointe.l for trial this day. On the opening of the Court, and before any cause was called on, a faimeication took place between the Lon)) Csitst Min* and some of the leadink Counsel on this Circuit, regarding the Uriwillingnosrof Special Jurorito attend in cases on which they were summoned to decide. It was very generally agreed, on the part of the Bar, that the evil, had risen to such a height as to require some strong measure to prevent not only the increase, but the re currence of it in future. The LORD CHIEF BARON expressed his full concurrence in the sentiments which had been declared by the Bar; and said, that Gen tlemen who were qualified to act as Special Jurors ought always, when summoned, to give their attend ance willingly in Court, if for no other reason, at least for this—that by so doing they encouraged common Jurymen to attend in discharge of the hum bler duties imposed upon them. He therefore an nounced lit; intention of fining such Special Jury men as did not attend that day in pursuance of the summons they had severally received ; and he trusted that, if he should have occasion to fine any Gentle man for neglect of duty, the example made of him would be of advantage in future, not only to himself, but also to the whole community, which he was bound to protect against all wrong-jeers, in return for . the protection which the community extended to him as far as the safety of his life and property depended. THE KING V.THE INHABITANTS OF STREATHAM. This case stood first on the list of Special Juries. Seven Gentlemen of the Special Jury had answered, when the.LonD CHIEF BAnoN requested the list to be read over a second time, observing that he would fine those who were absentees without a reasonable excuse. This was according done, and the following Gentlemen not answering, were fined as follows Sir J. 1). Broughton, Bart. 501. Thomas Langley, Esq. of Kingston, 50/. Henry Wright, Esq. of Ham, 501. John Augustus Knight, Esq. of Wimbledon,so/. John Garratt, Esq. of Kingston, 501. A tides being prayed, the case proceedei. It was an indict:nent against the parish of Streatham, for not keeping one of the roads from Streatham to Clap ham, over Clapham-common, in good and sufficient repair. As it possessed no public interest whatsoever, we shall confine ourselves to stating that the indict ment failed. TERRY V. THOMAS. This was an action brought by Mrs. Terry, a widow 1 tdy, residing in Clapham, against %V L, Thomas, a 'common carrier, to recover the sum . of Dee, being the value of certain goc.is, her property, intrusted to his care, and lost by his negligence. The facts on %%hick the plaintiff's ca'e turned ap peared to be these:—Oa the 17th September last ; ] Mrs. Terry, being on the point of setting out for Brighton, sent four boxes from Clapham, by :VDU's errand -car', to the waggon-office of Messrs. Sinning and Co. Half-Moon Inn, Southwark to. be conveyed to Brighion, by the defendaut's waggon of that dee, so as to reach their destination ou the subsequent', Friday. The direction on the boxes was " Mrs. Terry; No. 70, Marine Parade ; to be delivered on Friday afternoon, at Brighton." The book-keeper at Messrs. Starring and Co. s positively declared that the goods should be forwarded, as desired, by the waggon of that day.• It turned out, however, that they were net forwarded by the Tuesday's bat by the Friday's wag gon,a'nd that three Of LIIQHI never.re,achad the plain tiff; in. consequence of a rollbcry.that.was committed upon it; on the Saturday night, at gpson, cutest:races of g tertenegligence on the, part of the de-. fendent.... it appeared. that about twelve. o'clock at eighty'the waggon arrived at that own; .that it was lelifor an hour .aud a half in the open streets, with. 'out any: perion.to look after it, except the driver, who was at the .same time busily employed in tubbing downlis horses; that -about iwo o'clock he got into a 'place reserved .for the back of it, and slept there !Or some hourseZind that on _waking in the morning he diseoweradrAfast the. waggon lsaakbeen nabbed %luring the night ef-aclnsciFierableqoantity of property. All the Wien . Of Mrs. Terry -u ere it first supposed to be among. t propM-ty stolen; but it subsequently appeared that.otwoCtlatimatrived safe at Brighton ;:sincl,thoirgiveletained . isi the possession of the-deltodant for n'eensiderahla dale, was subse queue', restored 'wale plairnif about tho 7th of last February. The piaintif estimated th.e:property she had lost in the three byseg:n.o4l ►lr. Gtr« aver contended that she watentitiedto recover that amount on two grounds-0114,6n the defendant had been guilty-of a rnisfeasiuseaisiieuding it by the Friday's waggon instead of ; `T.uesday's, as was Originally ,contracted • and Oy, that the good s were lost owing to t a e imps uponoper tragligence of the defendant. Mr. MARRYAT COM-4ed alit the. plai utiff could not recover on several grounds:—first•of all, because there had been no misfeasance on the patt 'of the de fendant, he—never having proinieed, either by himself or his agent, to Send them to Brighton by the Tues day's waggon.; secondly, because the gook a ere above the value or S L. and not entered and paid for as such, though these gas a notice in the waggon wasehouse tbat the proprietors would not consfrer theniselves liable for the loss of any property above 51. unless it was paid 'for and entered as auch ; and 'thirdly, heels* therehad heed ho negligence on hii part, the hostler at Epsom being constantly employed by him to watch the waggon, whilst the driver slept in it. If, however, the Jury ehould think that his de fence was not tenable on these grounds, still he main tained that the Jury ought not to value the property lost at the price mentioned by the plaintiff, as they must have suffered by the wear-and tear, to which her witnesses submitted that they had been liable for some years pait. Mr. Manatee having called witnesses to substane elate his statements, ! • Mr. GEIRtqY replied to them, and said, that the defendant, in detaining from the plaintiff, till bruary last, one of the boxes, which had conse to his hand in September last, had acted as base and infamous a part at he had over known acted by a man who had dared to come into a Court of Justice: indeed, instead of having an action brought against him, he ought to have been indicted for a larceny.' He contended, that the evidence peadeced by his Learned Friend did - not shake in the slishteit degree, the evidence he had submitted for the'plaintifi-; the misfeasance and the negligence of the defendant were pro*d beyond all doubt ; and as to IL - notice that the prOprietors would not bt acconntahle rot the less of sot parcel.ahOve five pounds - valise, unless it waa paidfor aatil eitered as such, his tonfriett4fiead well knew, • tliat though it might protect a paetzy under many circumstances,.whiCh hesiould sit enu, merate, itnever could protect him against the effects of his own negligence. The Lone Clime BARON was preparing to sum up the evidence, when the Jury told him that it was unnecessary, as their minds were made up on one point, namely, that the plaintiff was entitled" to a verdict. After a few minutes deliberation, they esti mated the damages which she had sustained at 1:84, and returned a verdict to that effect. enows count Edward Haks was found guilty of a rape •on the person of Maria Fenner, a child of eight years of age, but was recommended to Mercy by the Jury. • .The Learned Judge, in passing sentence of death upon him, informed him that Le %taint employ the short time he had to live in making his peace with Gap, whom he had sb grievously offended, as be (Mr. Baron GRAHAM) should have great "diffiCsdty in ap-. plying the recommendation of thelury to so enormons a crime as that of which he had been found guilty. The prisoner, in leaving the dock, declared that his life had been sworn away by perjtired witnesses. Milford, who was stcquitted at the last Assizes of the capital charge, was this day convicted on the minor charge of having committed an assault with the intent to commit a rape, on the body of a child under ten years of age. He was sentenced to twelve months imprisonment, and to hard labour at the tread-mill during the whole of that time. LEICESTER. Rama Lliqer, aged 22, was charged with a rape on Eliza Wright, aged fourteen years, on the9th of October last. This trial excited a great deal of in -1 terest, and attracted a large crowd. The first witness called was Eliza Wright, the child. Her statement was clear and intelligent for her years.. She stated, that oa Wednesday, the 9th of October last, she was sent by a woman, named Simmons, from Waltham, die place where she lived, to Melton, a distance 'of about three miles, with a bonnet. On her way she hal to pass along a path- 1 way through a field, which led to a small wooden bridge, where also another path, running from ano ther direction, terminated. When she an ivei at the bride she saw a young man sitting on it, as if wait ing for her; and as soon as she came up-to him he souk a basket ft orn Fer hand, and asked her if she had a father and mother? She said she had a mo ther, and a brother and'sister. He then led her along a pathway, he still keeping hold of the basket. The time of day might be about twelve o'clock. Whilst goinr , along, they saw a man coming on the road on horseback. He gave her her basket, let her hand go, and as soon as the man on horseback had passed out of sight he again took her hand, led her to a distance from the path into the field to a haystack. The re maining part of the witness's narrative fully estab-' .lisped the fact of the full crime being perpetrated.— When she got to Melton she told Mrs. Simmons that she would not return• the same way unless some per sot would accompany her, as she was very mach afraid of meeting a man that way. She did not re turn that day, but staid and slept with Mary Ormond. Mrs. Simmons and Mrs. Ormond, and some other witnesses, described the coming of Eliza Wright on the day in question; she appeared distressed and ill. ansl when:brouglitback to Wi4thim the next day by 'the sameitatb, when' they_arrived at the hay-stack, she burst into team . - Her mother, at that time, was out nursing; and when she came home, in conse: queueoolsorne indications, she was induced to make some- *milks, which led ultimately to the steps taken against the prisoner.. The girl minutely de scribed the dress and person of the man who perpe trated the crime, and declared that she would know I him anywhere. lii the month of March last she and her mother were at Melton, at a shop, when Eliza Wright seeing -the prisoner pass by, she instantly pointed him out as The man. He was accordingly appreheuded. In the description she gave of the man who committed the crime, she stated that he was a fair man, having several remarkable red spots on his'' face. She also stated that he had used a large horse I comb to remove some loose hay from her cloak; and it was also in evidence that the path which met the Waltham-path, at the wooden bridge, led from the prisoner's father's house, and a person walking that way could have a full view of any person in the other path. The girl was firm and unshaken in her decla ration as to the identity of the prisoner. Mr. READER , on the pact of the prisoner, c all e d John Neape, a young man who was 4 companion of. the prisoner. He stated that,,On the day when the' crime was alleged to have bien committed, the pri- Winer and he had been together at his father's house, the Blacknioor public-hods*. 'He and the prisoner met by appointment, which they made the evening before, to go together on that ever.ing (Wednesday) to Leicester, to the fair, which was to take place the next day. In fact, they did not 0 0, in consequence of an objection snack .by the prisoner's 'wife. Be came in the morning of that day, and about teal o'clock they- began:to play at bowls in the yard of the illackinoot publichouse, at which they stayed until twelve, or half-past twelve o'clock. They then went into the house, in company with a man of the name ofJoaes; where they had some dinner, in the presence pf the prisoner's father, - step-mother, and his sister. they remained there, for about an hour and a half,- and then went to play at - bowls again, and,' continued playing until five 'or six o'clock in the evening. He declared, in the most positive manner, that he never saw any red spots on the prisoner's face. The witness, on his cross-examination, stated that the day became very wet about twelve o'clock, and that, notwithstanding, they continued at 'playing bowls; they were wet through. The prisoner was* a horse-breaker. Joseph Jones—Was also at the Blackmaor pu'olic ! house on Wednesday, the 9th of October. He played at bowls with the prisoner and Neape. They went t 6 dinner in the house. He and the priioner sat down with his father and mother. Neape did not sit down, but' had some bread and beef. 'They after wards went again to bowls, and continued at them until five or six o'clock. The prisoner was not out of his presence from, about eleven till five o'cicrck . that day. He was positive that the prisoner had no spots on his face. The father, steppthotiker, csoufirructi . thc particular.; statc‘l by the last tiro witnesses, sir !sir as ! they were concerned. They. all concdriea is quiet ib= the prisoner never had any spot s on hi s f ace..lt Was . also stated that he had been married only a fete months before, but that his wife and he had been in. timite before the marriage. Mr. Justice PARK addressed the Jury, and et. plained at length the law on the question, and pointed out the bearings of the evidence on both sides witit much ability. He observed; that the description gi n* . of the man who perpetrated the crime, answered is • every respect to the appearance of the prisoner, etc, cept as to the material point of the spots on the fates. The intelligent manner in which the girl gave her evidence was very much in favour of the credibilitt , of her statement, and it was further assisted, so far as • it affected the prisoner, by two circumstances. Tha 4 first was, that the- path-way which led to the woodeu, i ibridge,und joined at that poi n t the p a th by w hi c h th i i .13irl came, proceeded from the direction of "the prir; 'soner's father's home. Nest it appeared that the prig: soner had made use of a large bo rs e• co mb to remove loose straws from the child's cloak, and it was in evix dente that he was engaged in taking ewe of hotses.. .I.3nt there was then the united testimony of five or sit witnesses as to his being at another place at the time when the crime was alleged to have been comini tte4 It was also alleged by all these itnesses that the prisoner never had any spots on his face, and it mutt not be forgotten, that persons of the complexion of the prisoner were less liable than others' s() eruption; and red marks on their faces. It was for the Jury, however, to decide upon the weight of evidence. As . to the evidence of the girl herself, he had no hesita. tion in believing all she said. It might be true, and he was sure it was, that the crime had been perpe. trated by somebody. • He took it for granted that the :441 was firmly persuaded that the prisoner was the man. She might however be mistaken. Mistakes as to identity were frequent, so that the innocence of the prisoner was perfectly consistent with the story of the girl.—The Jury, after some hesitation, brought in a verdict of—Not Guilty. lhontas tiolnizom was itulicted, 'on the Ending of a Coroner's Inquest, for felonio us ly in fl icting with his hand a Mona' bruise on the head of John Deacn, oa the 7th July last, of which the said Deac.)ii died the 9th September following. _ - 77" Poi' • • ~~ -Y *. " 2 1!P.F 1 Ni!SVPII one tbal ber of suant Virir tur Lat. they fat- Dosseti tence thP Harr , an(' piodl each fervent'• meet H, which res% seems posnie the the to,. Oat., and r - woricE -k‘ Teri festers commit I dm Admiralty bld Bailey, Lc k gbt o'Cloc HE CO GUSTO: of receiving 15 comma for t h e senior of the CI brs of which Surveyor for Et The Tenders en et 'Wore T " Theder'jhr ►JSHE COE) -A° COMPAN k eke NAST 11 'That a GEN! kseill at thiAr Ho tSe 9th April ne . Zs lathe 'Lyrist the said Compas . George Brown, a surgeon, attended the deceased. 4 T COMP•t HE CO U.( He complained greatly of a p a i n i n hi s h ea d. Ac. ' cording to the desire of the . deceased, his he a d was A, ite - EmTrA .A . ' z i opened after his death. The brain Wits perfect. fle : - That a °l': E found a large hydatide. - . held at their Ho . . The Junoz.—That is the same sort of thing as the - ‘,l3thllf . April next, dry rot in sheep. ~..?,. Sat In the Evenin Witness.--It is water in the head. It was a large ( .4, Priam: . 1 : I one; it .weighed three ounces. It is impossible to say DA that this could be the - result of a blow. I cannot say lra, whether or.not this might have been formed by nature. C. 'The 'JUDOS here told the Jury, that on (his evidence • . Ito they could not- say that the death of the man was .'''To BALLOT on caused by the blow. " That thii Co , The prisoner was Acquitted accordingly. • , Impolicy of the et Thomas Bosworth was indicted for highway rob.. fish India. bery, in taking from John Arnold a - silver watch, , " That these re two half-crown pieces, some shillings and sixpences. •- on the interests of Jchn Arnold stated, that he met the prisoner oa ' 'Refiners, and the the high road. They walked tc7t . gether for lour miler, those o f t h e B t fu s when the prisoner, who was a very stout man; seize) " sive and unjust tom tarn round the neck, beat him down - ,••and rtiblied. - dutriMental tb the him of the articles o entioned in the indictment. lit only as a Contmert identified the prisoner. The watch was not protium& city of the dominic Thomas Arnold,', - the son of the prosecutor, 'bat ' That, as the in that he saw at the srublio t house where thedniscaer was brought after being. api•rehenced, iliat.the di* claim's on the prole slaty of this Court 1 bon and rinal -were those that Were , attached to b • 0 sum that have a to father's watch: The prisoner soon afrer • Made his escape, the Window.. .. .. , population over wt The Jury found him Guiky—Deati. consideration of tht .. . • .: ,-..., tied with every otb This prisoner was found Fuilty, a few Weeks age, .i , ) , h at it a nat appear of a capital o ff ence, at the St a ff or d A ss i zes , an d was Aiti elf last session removed to'Leicester by Habeas Corpus. imposed ea the Wt . exclusive protectiot against of Bri Wednesday last, Chart::: Roe, and Benjamin Mille4. " alasT the pr were executed on Gallows Hill, Nottingham, pw- =4 West Indies suant to their sentence at the late Assizes held there. foliketiveeotomet EIROOTIoN 01 DOSSETTER AND THU TWCI Has. "t ow. the nem Majestyts Ministen treT.S:;w•These unfortunate men were executed oa Si.. 4 , That annid a turday last, on the new drop in f.ont of the Count ! ". • expeerarfo r ir o f Jail, Dorchester, for the robbery of the house al . _ laratlai and enjoins Lady C. Darner. • Soon after their condemtialioai ' meter, the Ease ( they all began to prepare themseli es for the awful lts ,r.. ''.. u gr ia r n s g, and ra l fate which awaited them. Theobduracy evinced byo Houses of Dossetter and Thomas Hal vey, on healing Maass . , w —________ tence of the Judge, was but of short duration. Oa • DON N'S the following morning (Sunda)), at the request ai.• • 'da y „ ( , m c Thomas Harvey / Wales, the accomplice, was.ali - TilpitTus C lowed an interview with the prisoners. 0 The UM .'4. CENTED Harveysetpressed , tn him their sincere forgivelmil titat d .3 and EXOI and entreated him to pursue a different line of ' 1 " duct from that which had brought them to so wretclall . G n a w , Facnv cne 13 1 a situation. They then - shook hands with him, ad Tenth Edition, a after Wards with their uncle; mutual exchanges offre . n.. P r inter) 4q giveness then passed • bet Ween them. The unwestial Rem ~ rri_il!el attentions of the Chaplain (the Rev. Mr. Worm) elle ;: i sa r d u tnin t ......._________. productive of the best e ff ects on their temper and 410 1 !_. mod, Joo n , an hip. Dossetter . and Thomas Harvey had entetB4ll l BOOK prison with sentiments of deadly hostility tawdmi . BY j each other; but they now daily met in pea ce, Illi RIVVELS. in fervently joined in player; When the entree' sift ...,. tOtA.—ny the merit arrived for their leaving the prison, Wilo "gee. Cambridge Harvey was seized with- one of those fainting fits, talsjaaSa. In board AAttlasCat. which he *as sukject, and•was - sonveyed totheam!, ew e . Si x th Ed Tom ition fold in a chair." • Thomas Harvey appeared . --! . ti Translations o f resigned. Dossetter wept a great deal, thoag4 'wink a Map of Ital iletitllosot * seems to have contemplated his death with great -, . ' -" 'a Ilk am price _IL I . posure. They continued . 2 short time in par; f liousa," Andshe ex., the Chaplain, and at twenty minutes past three o'- • 'ftklarlee ei. 6s. in bl the drop fell. They appeared to suffer but lira. ,lasvess of Conn - - - . ----- , I _,..r.luthe Ramo c COUNTRY MARKETS. . ___ .. i L'""le Mumusaipt in &roan, lia.acii29.—Vibeares, INA a hoist . illtrill 7' 4 a Memoir f a half-peck loaf (household) is. 4d. • 1 6 7a - o[ Nos Metre BANBURY, Aran. s.—Wheat 4a. 6a. to 7s. Sd—lklio ' tb ... n . tm, en'a Seats, as to 4s ed.—Vetches, Os. Od per busbel.—Barley, 24 .$ 0 ',. - '1 ,1 • 4 t0. price 4L 4, Oats, 18s Od to. 26s Od per guarter—Bread, is 3d half , • ...A Plexuannua T : '''k Peke 10s. bound. Mullions, Aran. D.—New Wheat per load SO Os to . , , b t ow my Ind smaller in proportion. Hour 345. to 48s. pee,tank- `+ ' , Ma, a tbs, l i mn : Wheat, £ll Os to £l6 00s—Barley per qr. 30s to Pim% Liy. ' on 22s to 30s —Beans 29s to 53s.—Peas, 38s to 401. . e. Price U. 7s. be 14yaioeJaansate r ~..,11ts A.M. Late Fell lotte 38sHolywell 38$ 3d-KiMogwortia 40$ to 41 . .. ,_. _Tilif llicrci.or.ont Adairs 38s - thi CO — A ßLd l on lAß 39 l( s Eir 34- 1 Main 37s—TanSeld Moor 37s— lam 384—W „ j _. - ""Vellotte the twOfc APRlL Beauntos 4 t . 35. • .. ton 48h—Walisend Stewart aiss--walisead Stobps -7 "` ' kat A Lowry, "all' . „ 6 minuets diet "".• • IL IS , each in Is Mt.rtung - ....„..... hitt royal HIGH. WATNitat LONDON BilDtig 1 ts-N.i. ,l % e ' ri co _ &c . (to he 4 '4 tohnleilluo”_„ • i. ~,n _ . Paper, will Afternoon • . - . -.......0 ma, each cart. LONDON ...,. Place, Ter:lie-Bar. - • " thaserl46 o l,,, • LONDON: Printed-and published by rivet .: Its, .; . ta, ,, Bro e p oeft ," t * a