Star. — London, England, 1823-03-05 00:00:00

with respect to the elegy. The Hon. Gentleman mis took altogether the character of tithes. these were not given merely for the benefit of the Church;but for that of the people. He described some of those who received. them to defraud the country, and therefore he -pro posed to withdraw the property from them altogether. Because certain Members of the Clergy, in parti cular pacts of the country, do not perform their duty, I," cried this great Reformer of the modern school, will mulct the districts which have thus been wronged of the means of maintaining Clergy for ever!" Supposing the case of abuses to have existed in an hospital - , would that be a reason foe doing away that hospital? The Hon. Gentleman might say he did not argue fairly in compariog his plan with the Resolutions of 1640, as the llon, Gentleman had proposed not to limit the allowance 'of the Clergy to the sum then thought sufficient for their maintenance, as be proposed to grant them an iocome of between one hundred and five hundred ,pounds per annum, but in principle be conceived the proposition to be the same. He (Mr. Goulburn) was loot bound to the Established Church by any idle ;veneration which would lead him to favour those who neglected to fulfil the duties of their situation. Ile, however, felt that great advantages were de. rived from the efforts made to promote religious knowledge, and it had always been the pride of the Church of this country to have produced more men of learning, and of general knowledge, than had distinguished any other Church in the world. This supplied one reason against uncalled for inter ference with the Clergy. Unle,s the same induce. silents, as formerly, continued to be held out, the same influx of learning and talent could not be expected. When he (Mr. Goulburn) compared the Church of England with that establishment to which the Honourable Gentleman was very fond of refer ring, the Church of Scotland (of which he meant to speak with proper respect), when he considered the distinguished individuals which had been furnished to the world by each, he confessed he could see no reason for altering our present Church Establishment. Ile (Mr. Goulburn) would not deny that there were persons connected with the Church of I: eland, who were also connected with some of the most exalted. individuals in the State; but unless the Honourable Gentleman could shew that these persons were un worthy to fill those 'situations to which they had been promoted, that objection of the Honourable Gentle man's was of no weight. The House would find, on the contrary, that these Reverend Persons were of such a character as might entitle them to be deemed ornaments of the Church of this country—to the ta lents, zeal, and virtues which distinguished int Clergy, even the Honourable Gentleman himself harl i borne testimony—(Cheers).—ln the list of Irish Bishops were to be found many individuals, who, for learning, piety, and zeal, yielded not to any Clergy in the world. He believed that he had now alluded to all chose topics 'urged by the Honourable Gentle man to which he had felt anxious to reply. The Ho nourable Gentleman had moved for a Committee, and had prefaced his motion by some observations stating, however, that his only object was inquiry. But even had the Honourable Gentleman refrained from such prefatory remarks, he (Mr. Goulburn) would have equally resisted the motion for a Com mittee, as one fatal not only to the interests of the Church, but to the whole property of the country. If the House entered into the views of the Honour able Gentleman, they would support his motion for a Committee; but if they were inclined to vote for supporting the Church in its integrity, and for the preservation of the establishments of the country, they would join him (Mr. Goulburn) in giving to the motion a decided negative—(Cheers). Mr. STUART vindicated the appointment of the Irish Clergy. None had been selected but the most deserving individuals. The late Primate, in the course of twenty years, had given no appointment to any re lation or friend of his own, and therefore the charge inferred on that subject was wholly unfounded. Mr. HUME said, the Primate might have so dis posed of the appointments,if he had pleased (A laugh). Mr. STUART referring to some of the statements of the Hon. Gentleman, regretted he suffered himself to be led away by such inaccurate representations. Till the Act of 1807 passed, there was no power to compel tin residence of the Clergy. That Act had dote much towards correcting the evil, and if the Hon. Gentleman were to go again to Ireland, he would find there was no lack'of resident Clergymen. Mr. M. FITZGERALD lamented the dispropor tionate remunerations of the Clergy, which made it difficult to procure those sincere and zealous exertions which were required. He wished for an inquiry, on the principle that the Irish Church ought to be placed , on a more secure balls than any other. It was desk .able to inquire whether the humbler members of so ciety were not induced to depart from the Established Church by the absence of the Clergy ; and whether the splendid Hierarchy which was kept up had not absoi bed the middling and lower classes of the Clergy? He wished to direct the attention of the House to a very melancholy fact. He knew a place in the South of Ireland which was formerly peopled by Protest ants, the descendants of Irish Protestants, who had left the district to go where they might find an active . Clergy. The absence of the Clergy was occasioned •by their pluralities—four, five, seven, and in one is. stance eleven livings, having been held by one in& vidual. It, however, seemed that a new light had burst on the English Government, as they not only attended to the good character of the part, now ap pointed, but care was taken to ascertain that he was a man of distinguished ability. He feared the mea sureruf the Right Hon.Gentlernan, for the regulation of the Tithes, would prove inadequate to correct the evil. If such a plan were brought forward. as t* submitted to Parliament last year, he coulil only vi* it as an instance of continued infatuation, and a ',tend: rug to undermine the ezistiag falsric.of titt_rebafeh- Mr. Secretary PEEL thought the•Honourahle Gen. demo might • have deferred till the day after to morrow giving an opiriion 4it ;hi ret#ittre to be brought forward by hit RisEt Honourable Friend.. .$0 much confidence he 4.6m0/tics, due to the Irish' Government, who, it had been admitted, selected for high offices those only who were recommended by their fitness to fill them; and therefore ered'it might , have been given them for' a dispocition fa' reforms . . abuses which had been shewn to prevail. The nourable Gentleman had stated that the Protestant . population had been withdrawn from a considerable district in consequence of the nealect of the Protest- ant Church. •He lsoggell. ha . sietkrersgt bad led to the Ilt haktii Protestant population referred 4404 savtiOdrairal 05441, it , unless a practical ref! isle then,,read a statement fib the/Aril Printietk :thi.C.hutch, there would be no pltace which set forth thaktheliiings.inahiseparisbes were - !Mr. liecretary PEEK explained. so low that no Clergyman-could be found to aceept-Igetttkman had it unfo r tun at e of them, a factiou s vote o f t h e I r i s h H o u s e o f C o m-' reference had been made by him. mons having reduced.the Vicars to want, and made 'atth. He.thought it but fair to it necessary to unite several Vicarages into.one bene- newer,- in any clehataon the Catholi 6ce. In a case where several of these had been thus. the. Coronation Oath against t) united, the total income arising from them did not minded. - Such an argument he' exceed 2001. and in other cases, the amount produced .would-lie ever use one, which he was not prepared to under similar circumstances was not more thanlo9l. avow, and maintain. .. The vote alluded to had passed in the year 1735, and Mr. DENMAN expressed satisfaction at the ex its object was to discourage the growth of Popery. planation, of the Right Hon. Gentleman. Such an effect was not likely to be produced by that Mr. PLUNKETT begged to trespass on the Hops' Resolution, and nothing could be more unjust.— tor a few moments. He did so with reluctance, but But he had not risen to reply to the last speaker, but be felt he should be wanting to himself, to the situa to the Hon. Gentleman who had brought forward the .tion which he had the honour to fill, arid to the part present motion. The question was not now, - ithether which he was accustomed to take oa that question, abuse's should be inquired into which were admitted which had been incidentally connected with the.... to exist. This was not sought: for he considered the bate of this night, if he were not to offer Oaf Or trip, greatest enemy to inquiry was that man who brought .observations ois this occasion. The natureef:Chansh, forward a proposition founded on sea principles as property was well known to the House. It was not the Hon. Gentleman had adopted and avowed that for the purpose of speaking on this subject that he had night. If the Resolutions before the House were risen. But he could not allow the Resolutions of the, directed against the Irish Church, they affected also Honourable Member to be offered to the considera the English Church; and he should beg to remind tion of the House, without explessing,in terms as the House how these bodies were circumstanced with strong as the English language could supply, or respect to their discussions. He deshed that it should the rules of Parliament would allow him to use be borne in mind, that those connected with the 'in that House, his sense of the folly and desperation Church had no voice in Parliament, and that the of the measure which had been proposed, and ancient organs by which they u s ed to express their without expressing the strongest reprobation which sentiments .had long ceased to exist. Especial care it was in his power to bestow--#/ear, hear, hear). — ought, therefore, to be taken of those who, by the The plan of the Hon. Gentleman, for governing the Acts of that House, were denied the opportunity of Church of Ireland, if proper for that country, would defending themselves. Bat it was not against in- be proper for England. If adopted by Parliament, quiry that he protested, - but against the adoption they would in effect declare that the property of the by the ,House, of . principles which must lead to Hierarchy wa s li a bl e to be disposed of for put . - . Irposes _ .- slavery and spoliation : tor never before had such of religion, - or for any other ptirposes—(llenr, hear). doctrines been broached with respect to the right This would prepare the way for the downfall of the of petitioning as had been heard on this occasion Hieratchy, that of the Throne must follow, and this front the Honourable Gentleman--(llear, hear).— would of course involve the overthiow of the Consti- Was it possible that any branch of the community, tution—(Hear, hear).—He was no advocate for the but especially that branch which had no direct access divine rights or the sacred property of the Church ; to the House—was is possible that ;those who were -but he wished property to be held sacred. The thus circumstanced could be denied, and by a Whig? . Church was, in plain language, an integral part of —(Hear, heir).—And yet more, by one who carried our. Constitution, and could not be interfered with, his popular notions even farther than a Whig, that without interfering • with the Constitution—(Hear, the Clergy ought to be denied the privilege of corn- /year).—But th.. Hon. Gentleman had said Parliament plaining and petitioning, and told that they had no had interfered with the revenue of the Crown, and right to express their opinions where their interests had the same right to interfere with the Church. were so immediately concerned ?—(Hear, hear).— He admitted that it had the same right to in- Was it possible, because the Members of the Church terfere. But when the House interfered with the re met in their own diocese to express their opinions, venue of the Crown, it was not to commit an outrage, not saying that they would refuse to pay obedience but to make a compact, to which the Crown was a 4o the law, but asseptbling to remonstrate against its consenting party, which was to last but till the expi policy—Was it possible that any one could liken such ration of the life interest of the reigning Sovereign. conduct to that of a body of officers uniting with the But the proposition of the Right Honourable Gentle officers of another battalion to oppose the reduction man attacked the property of the Church for alleged of the.artny ?—(Hear, hear).—lf the House adopted irregularities, and wi t hout limi t in g hi s mea sure te a the views of the Honourable Gentleman, and if life interest, demanded that its property should be Quakerism were - to be the future religion of the State, , taken away- altogether. Brit then an eqoitable ad he knew not what he mig ht do, or what course it justment was to-be m a de. A n d w h a t was-the equi might be'the pleasure of Parliament to pursue; but table adjustment proposed? Why, that full coin; it the Reformed Religion was to he upheld, the peasation should be made to the individuals pow in members of the Church must be protected against the Church. This compensation was to heziven to such doctrine. Such principles as were now ad- the individuals of whose misconduct he complaitied;, , vocated had not been .acted upon in other days.. and the property belonging to the Church was to be It was not seen in history that' our ancestors bad taken -from their successors, who had never, offended overlooked the importance of supporting the Church. —(Hear, hear).--And this was the equitable adjust- The contrary course had been pursued. This was 'mow proposed by the Houourable Gentleonitil.. seen in the first page of the first chapter of our Con, (Hear, hear).—lf he deprecated taking web:a course stitution in that great Charter which had confirmed with the property of the Church of Englaed, he de the liberties (gibe country. The language there held precated still , more such interference with the Church respecting the Church was this—" Quad Anglican of Ireland. The property of the Church of Englhad Ecclesia libera sit et hac jura sua integra d libertatis was an integral part of the Constitution; so it was iti awes ilksas a ita miasmas observari quad apparel es eo Ireland: but besides that, the bond 'which connected libertate eledionunt maxima a magis necessaria reputes' Ireland with England grew out of. the Protestant' Eecksiat Anglican', mera et spontanea ooluntale:'— Establishment. When he had heard a speeCh like Again, it would be found that in 1688, when the li- that-of the Honourable Gentleman's, much as he re berties of the country were re-established, it was not grettedthe situation of the Roman Catholics, it was thought inconsistent with those liberties to require impossi ble for him to be silent. Anxious as he was from the King, on his Coronation, a positive oath, in that the claims of the Catholics should be conceded, the presence of the Bishops and Archbishops, that he•would fling them to the winds if he believed that the King would maintain the reformed religion, and the granting of them would be injurious to the Pro defend the ancient rights of the Church. He denied • testant interest. But what was the ground on which that the situation of the Church resembled that of he recommended that measure? It was this, that he the Quakers, or any other body of men voluntarily was satisfied that no act of legislation was so well . associated, and he would refuse to accompany the calculated to give security to the Protestant interest Hon. Gentleman in his argument, from the character as that which mould restore a great body of the people of his Resolutions. It was in vain that the Hon. Gen- to their long lost rights—( Hear, hear). tleman maintained his motion tended to further the Mr. MONCK agreed with his Honourable Friend ! views of the Primate, because the situation of the the Member for Aberdeen, that the Ecclesiastical Church of Ireland had been misunderstood, and that Revenues were not so much intended to benefit the he therefore called for a Committee of Inquiry. For Clergy as the People at large. When the House was such an inquiry he was disqualified by the first Reso- called upon to vote millions for the building of lution, in which the Clergy were treated as intruders Churches, where was the harm of asking whether the on that property which of right belonged to them, Ecclesiastical Revenues were net equal to bear the and which required that that property should be ap- expense? Where was the harm of taking something plied by the House to any purposes which they might from the Hierarchy of the Church to be bestowed think proper. He would not refer to the antiquity upon the inferior Clergy ?It was with this view that, of this property in the country, but. he would call lie should support the Resolutions, and not with any upon the House to look at the Act of Union between desire of spoliation, because he did not think that England and Ireland, and then ask if it was possible either the Church of England or of Ireland were tod for them, without violating the contract then made, well endowed. to reduce the Dignitaries of the Irish Church to one Mr. GRATTAN said, that from what bad fallen Archbishop and four Bishops, as had been proposed? from the other side, he was apprehensive that no For the reasons he bad given, from the character of measures were intended to be proposed by the Go the Resolutions, he felt disqualified from entering into vernment on this important subject. As inquiry was the inquiry now called fur, ,as he felt it his duty to necessary, he should support the Resolutions, without oppose altogether the entertaining of principles like agreeing inall the doctrines advanced - by the Hon: those now recommended to the adoption of the House. .Member - for Aberdeen. He should never support ' Mr. DENMAN was not dispoied to wait till the any views or principles of spoliation; but he was of opinion that .the Officers of the Church in Ireland., evils complained of were- attempted to"lie reformed by those who opposed this motion, as, if he did so, he and its revenues, ought to be regulated. By the eye feared there would bean chance of their getting any sent system, Ireland bad been made a tathokeemis j reform at all. • He saw nothing in the. Act of . Union try ; for there were not now- more thee tout or k it i which ought to preclude thernfrom considering what hundred thousand Protestants in Ireland. lleenose • principleought•to be applied to the government of be thought inquiry neceisary ) he shoglsl ; r2;tefosle !..3 therlrish Church. He heard with dismay the' refer- Resolutions. - .. , ri gore made, toahe COtonation Oath. He-thought no (,Mr. HUME, sw "worth reple is pist 4.04,544 areutnept . drsiwn from that source could prove very •Idonourahle Vestlemeo.opposite if,hia leo gmage,:ar cooeiliatory s as that , had, for a long period, prevented if anythiqg which he 44 . said,desfri,4 * ) , ial i n ; , a fair, discusileti of the claims of the Catholics. It was Which the Right Ilowmgahle _ genOetnen ; ,4m! .phfortuaate that the Right Hon. Gentleman had made played? An attempt had lyeustuar t ierto Intsreers eny referen4e to the . Coronation Oath. He 54Vi no his expressions;• 0W jig - owed .•it to -0e:17404v-4 objection to considering whether the revenues of the owed it to himsejf- T be owed.it tp . .chi!eassA, iiiii Church could not be made more Conducive to the advocating, to mLeet that atlapt s.. as,it t fieseyee `fci: good of th e Church. What had been dant in the I be met. - the. Right Honourable oleetetary for „.... s , case of the Curacy Bill ? . These first principles had ~ .lead had'grossly misrepresented his iieselst 4 been referred to in order to make a better provision :compariog them to the 'Act of. 11140;wlileis7:' Ai): for the remuneration of the working G'letgy..or those Weep away ths whole " property of . # 4.ll Cliakilt, fA, who performed the duty. He knew of nothing in the •Gept a, poor 1004 He would ace caw say, IVA. speech •of the Hon. Mover that could viiirisint the ogossalriniuereseciting him : lot it wat-atilfq 1. to* strong observations which had been nucleon it. ile representing him; ft t his • s car t , , it• nb did aot.tneau to defend the whole of it, as be had. injury shall be done to the vested interests:Ll( any ,, 11 PolPer gots' his oil/went* statensAnts. i s:ailed 0 °rat 13 104 , 0Fleuid OPPPed ttle . ntmajerherrient iefitglo ,; if __ .... . 131Soea he aour ...le ineasepri e , iter i to call him to.oy e gr- !... 1 , if: 911 4/0 111 4091,01P4184411ffriar Vow passing 'INC rules o of, the lioulit l 44, had, but fol lowed . a.matt forward . coarse, is ,W)gatim bad said. The R ight , o:t. : ntletnen seeped to, Wive foot his ItikOtPile! 6 ) sneS(4.4l,lrt M.;iwkr,e mad bObbn. jytlo.4,..lie .. pati a tsgbt to, cpmithiut .that his opinions -4 1 4.41%. paced so ee-iMingper light. though, no at tetisf tOtadhein'snatle to lIISW CT his r tprgAtbents. He hadisaisOin:his own :mind something said by some .goseg,sg t in. soni e other place, and this,phanto m h e 04 voebbatted With great Agony. An what instance, ,Mr. Hume it%kia, bad he . ever attacked individual property"? And Wile tioyerlad, what similaiity was there between his arguments and those the Right Hon. Secretary had -opposed? The Right Hon. Se cretary had begun by saying he would on no account be concerned in bringing( forward. Resolutions which implied a sacrifice of hamper, honesty, and justice.— He (Mr. I-Inme) was not, however, shared to put forth such - Resolutions, and he felt himself as inca pable es the Right tian. Gent)e t asan of. supporti ng anything which was dishopourahi_4shenest, or un just--(Hear, heark•-1 34 ra.W ,hf mFeTrd front other Gentlemen on many points, every.atatement of his only: brought on him violent personal attacks— ( Hear, hear).—He was individually marked out for such attacks, though he was unconscious of ever making such attacks himself; and from what he knew of the House, thought they were the last nieasures an opponent could adopt. One Right Honourable Gen tleman had stated that he was the. greatest enemy of the country— ,,. . Mr. Secretary PEEL rose to .correct the Hon. Member; he had not stated that Mr. Hume was the enemy of the country, but the enetriy of inquiry.-- The Right Con. Gentleman was continuing, when the cries of " Spoke, spoke!" ".Chair,ihair I" cons pelled Mr. Peel to resume , his place. .-. Mr..HUME, in continuation, said that he wished to 'avoid personalities, and to ,have. arguments— weighty arguments, whithwere,alone worthy of such a subject. The Right iton..tbe.4torney-General for Ireland, .in thing, hasi . said.Oat he.tould not suff er the first Resolution to pas; ilstlinut expressing, in the strongest terms the Xitesh . languege could supply, or Parliamentary Osage would permit, his dete stat i on of the desperation andjolly of the. indiiidual who proposed it - 1,-,(Hear, keer). , .. . . 111i,PLAJNICETT retie to cirecA , theflen..Slernber. Ile hadnever . mentioned the sdivadnal . who brought forward the ineijarep hit'he dA-*Fribed .the plea .sure as fall of deSpetition l in up--illear). . ..,:ll4r. RIME its a th . e.ige4jilih,4l4tioduced the i is InOitire . ,.e.i;4l4:4et help thtnlttßg tkat:such a cha ragesliillt.eifie.reltieted.ssitnetas, n pen himself— :(4tighier sratit . ieall . .,.to riltep . ;psl)e,Ch of the Hon, .Atioinsek•G ' ... • . int Ikelstni,A4 }ou se might AMosqsaire,sup .. ,diatApickpmierty was now .toticbed,, or alptsit . t•ii . , be ~.iivilig. , tor the first pw r tiw... tie.. , ,Pki , MP, see .A, i ,48 1 ;1; Hon. and Liearno - pc4 . 4;eaultn. v, weltiecon4pg:hii feelings to his htteresti lidille ardireCir)4l,o44ilUit pro fessing such zeal for Calliolieinancgiation, 'he did not think that - be - slvirti..oo4de bicusplf to co- Opet:ite with Gentlemen Who admitted .all the evils for whichintiiiicOlinn witsa remedi, and yet, with- Oat Satisfying reasoni;oopi:Sid it-(Much cheering).— And the Right," Hon - Gentlemen opposite—for he (Mr: Hume) put diem :an tegether—(laughter)— the Right Hon: Gentleinen a c cused hind, of desperation and folly ; why did they - Ant:ciiitrgf,:the latel3i:hop of Llandaff, Dr. Watson, with deiperatiOn and folly ? Dr. Watson, who, in his letter to the Duke of Rut land (January, 1797) said, , t There is no .injustice in altering the value of benefices, or the mode of raising that value, when the property tif the benefice ieverts as it were to the State, It itii tte death* Of an incum bent"—(Hear, •Aear).-, ugh he was accused of " desperation and fol ly Honourable' Gentlemen would see that he gioktwith a Bithop on his side. Let the Right ,HOd. and Learned Gentlem'an (Mr. Plunkett)wlo tAliKgspoliation, let him answe r ho w "it happened chasheltad himielf been a party.to that great spoliatiOnotAeDish Clergy, the tithe of agist meat? Malttif . 4roni . wint to produce no such effects Tußigbaion.*4o.ary an t i the Right I.l4i.n.Qentle- Mai had licgi.flUotedSciiptaieupop sti j c ts - c fi s A ren — . It WAS sornetluog abtatt:ointrisent—he did' Arnow ex actly what :It svis ( Loud kughterl—but 6Winsuld tell them Neljit St. Paul had said in his > 14,4e.te the 11)easaltOnians.."Si. Paul *them teid,.a Foc_etn.when S. : 1 00 with you, we commanded ytii t. t . l4t if a man *i_ , Pl Rot :.ork, so ueithep shall . te eat. -(,1 7044 Ikili 4414 Ofi t limaill said was'—fOgo* Sc. PAW • .10C Mit tbcilie Cl - 'ReA be paid . who ,144 T not . vcork;, Ile to the Rig Iloit. Genilematilymild impress ,tliii, as i.tiOn&ll,, Pik i 1 1 # 1 )i 0 At, (Oa il); ;remark el l shout. tie • wff,Plc.,: . ltion." Balfi,her then' read mime ci?otp,4lms (94 Oct', and other . *.ritets which . 14 0 1 . 15 #4 14 :0 ,P 1? tile e4nciPleS 4 tk..ktpsolu tfonin"Aadi.ptibm9ted to the Louse. - lie expressed his tutepu?a,,sir ii4difidkng 4ielip'use ttpun the first E, e4 al ot io4, twc ,ll o ,l ill second, which , only . related to iii9.:4474e.Mt,ttOtilkid ‘ 43 .. .1 'Mr: Gli .BllllWczp . , ..114 at - gement was, .i.hattitOheilessdielirWai noe,l 4 . p h: . 4 !poliation of th e . i iirc l i r, itt hifoi nif * il t krte ': t e ition of private , 4' ~...,( !,, zn . , s. , , in , it . 't:Jt tln! .'l t eS43 lo4/ 41 1#1 1 0 -. • 4,1 r inved , ‘ll,2slie . see ' use in . : • 4. 1 hno lt a te l o7 i. 13-: 11 .. T . Z: •', 1 4 il..,::J.so nv e l cid „yip lin h..:Q, 7: y.:4:4•.);...117 -4-'lY , ' ilVoNtib o) libibriiri:-' *(.l' I writes. - -- sr sim ift . Pitt WCIBB; • 1 1VB.\ .NitgitirtATtriciiiiostaH the ittkiAtiOtrathe tgitliAiireitiistittfieiki•hidiliadebthe time 'ied weinjitti Adkilitititt r ßottfd• and t W4 etOrttsitiee; • the Of brit BaatVtlsibilTonour ktili Spit titillt*etatrofiti litititheficti,•iihich have iiitkiegarci to the latttiekiend . Orlieterahtierehant-thlps ofFee ba. Re ition'dlaY diade to the Admiridtl i and the let ,:leet.4rotgßliiiietl*Mt? *lt to the - ecretirititte4 and LianielS, in Bristol, staial, that his • I;ritattagleisteilse-- a slukad aurt-the • • '• • _llietenterlOtt a p form wawa p • tad-in remaropeckin,t,4ollll,, and k primed his , Phce in Isekon4. . - , 4 1%7104 41 414) 1ttir 5t li r ; icre ilitrSpfccsmitiet . hbi stac nod. llie- Leaned ..,. 4kik .* 1W 1 0441 4 T !alie Ryortuni t te that any AT.,a4o, 4 4 1 4;44, iltsim , . .. . . 1. to the Coronation tilj.o4,laft iboli) _ wt. - i had n l* 0x 33 state, that he bad UoRPIIriOPIe, 4 1 fPla vfien3:l4eß t 4,141 loik Question, urmd ary.farmo; . grass -. , p af 104, the concessions - de. Went w _on t 0 Mr**, orfi, ITs... 19.444P411 ) ) had never used, nor able pleasammip.aia l «ow% it. pracasAlki 44s i of e— the nce II G• ion I 1 CC 1 16 ' nJi bey Elie itt:e !en he.l 03,e ~; t'. 1.- t cl ICC , tne• pe..l ,114 t Vet ;id- luxe ) %vial