Star. — London, England, 1821-12-17 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. . COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DECEMBER 15. CRlbf. CON. WRIGHT V. WRIGHT. Mr. SCARLETT stated the case to the Jury. The plaintiff, Mr. John Wright, was a respectable wine and brandy merchant and retail spirit dealer, residing in Ratcliffe Highway. The defendant was his first cousin ; and was a linen merchant, residing at Nor wich, and also a man in a very respectable line of trade. The plaintiff's wife was from that part of the country ; she was from North Walsham, in the county of Norfolk, and was the dauihter of the Coroner of that county. Mr. Abraham Lemmon produced the register of that marriage, at North Walsham, Norfolk. .. Sarah Hubbard knew the plaintiff, Mr. Wright, as well as his wife, who was a relation of her'sore her marriage. Vitness lived six years with them at ltatcliffe Highway. They lived together very hap pily. Mrs. Wright served alwajs at the bar of her house, and seemed active in the business. Cross-examined.—lt was a gin-shop in Ratcliffe Highway, and Mrs. Wright served out the liquor at the bar. Mrs. Mary Stewart visited the family ; and for the last time in August, 1820, when she staid there three days; they lived very comfortably, just as happily as other married people did. Harriet Bankes lived as servant of all work with the plaintiff at Ratcliffe since last September twelve month. She saw the defendant for the first time there last March, when he came in late in the evening, and slept at the house. On another day he came and staid until twelve o'clock ; he supped with her master, and Vie served him at the table. About three o'clock on the following day he came and dined at the house; she overheard him ezpress a desire to her master to go to the play ; her master objected, as he said it was laic, but a coach was sent for, and both he and her master went away in it. Witness had orders from 'Mrs. Wright to get the spare bed ready fzir him (de fendant) on that night. The two men (plaintiff and defendant) went to the play about half-past eight p'clock, but about half-past nine the defendant re turned alone, and she then first saw him in the kitchen with her mistress, which was an unusual . place for the latter at that hour. Witness saw her mistress un expectedly in the kitchen at that time, for she gene rally staid at the bar when her master was out. She saw Mr. Wright, the defendant, in the kitchen kissing her mistress, and his hand down ber bosom. On being disturbed by witness, they both withdrew into the parlour. At eleven o'clock they were in neady the same position as when she saw them in the kitchen. They were standing together near the ni:..itle-piece, but they moved away on seeing her— defendant to one side of the fire-place, and her mit ess to the other. Jane Shuffery lived in the plaintiff's service, and knew the defendant, Wright. She remember ed the last occasion when he came to the house and slept there. She recollected his dining there, and going with the plaintiff in a coach to the play. That was the first night. he ever slept in the house. After din ner, and just before they went out, the defendant said be should sleep there that night ; her master laughed at him, and said he wasilking, for as he had taken lodgings at a coffee-house, he did not think he was serrotis. She remembered the defendant's soon return ing, and telling her mistress that he left her master at the play. Shc (mistress) then quitted the bar, quite against her custom, and staid an hour and a half in the parlour with the defendant, without a light. It was in Marc:). Matthew Wiggins was a servant or cellarman to Mr. Wright for two years. lie knew defendant, who occasionally visited in the house ; he recollected his coming in the month of March last year. The wit- ness said, that while in the kitchen, lie heard a noise as if the chairs were moving about in the parlour. He told the servant-maid he would go and see what they were , 4 doing ou." lie pulled off his shoes, and walked along the passage to the parlour as softly as he could. Witness went sound towards the bar, where - there were no lights; the door from the bar to the parlour was open; he knelt on a mat which was at the door, and peeped in at the corner of the door, which Was ajar. (Here the witness described the po sition in which he saw his mistress and the defendant in the parlour when he peeped in, and which left no doubt of the fact of adultery). Mr.GURNEY addressed the Jury for the defendant. They had here no seduction, no arts, no deceit. As to the condition of the woman, she was, as they had heard, merely serving in a . gin-shop, and possibly romping with the defendant in the manner her maids sometimes do, and out of that perhaps was framed the whole case. If the Jury thought this was a case for damages, he was sure they would think with him that the smallest damages would be quite so6u:•nt, for such a transaction. Lord Chief Justice Miaow, in charging the Jury, said, that the first question which they had to con sider was, whether they believed the adultery had been committed ? U they believed the witness Wig gins, then upon that point there could be no doubt, for on his testimony the proof rested, the other wit messes merely speaking to acts of im propriety, _ but not amounting to the principal act. With respect to the question of damages, it was true that this case was unattended with the points of aggravation which sometimes are found in such offences. They would of course look at the plaintiff's situation, at the injury he had received, and at the probable means at the disposal of the defendant. They would consider these circumstances dispassionately, and apportion the da mages which they deemed applicable to a case of this character. The Jury consulted together for about five minutes, and then returned a verdict for the plaintiff—Da mages, £lOO. 4 WINSTON V. GLOSSOPP. This was an action against the defendant for an alleged assault and battery. The defendant pleaded first the general issue, not guilty, and second son assault demesne. The plaintiff's case was in substance this :—ln May last, when his Majesty visited Drury-Lane ',theatre, of which the plaintiff is Stage Manager, orders had been sivcii to keep the lobbies clear of strangers during hi s Majesty's entrance int o an d de parture from the Theatre. The defendant, who is proprietor of the Coburg Theatre, and one of his Majesty's Honourable Band of Pensioners, being in attendance on his Majesty on that occasion, had sent his own servant to the Theatre .to wait for him is case be should be wanted. Vie servant having sta tioned himself in one o the lobbies, the plaintiff, in obedience to the instructions he bad received, de sired him to withdraw, using an expression, as was alleged by the ,defendant, of an offensive nature, which being communicated to the defendant, he de termined tare:eat it on the first occasion of his meet ing the plainillf. It was proved in evidence, that the t, on the 11th of May, two days after his !Chesty bad been at the Theatre, called at the stage door, and' inquired whether the plaintiff was in the Muse? He was informed that he was, and an offer was made to bring Mr. Winston to him; but the de fendant said he did not want him then ; he, however, wished to know at what hour the plaintiff usually left the Theatre to go to dinner ? He was informed that be was a very punctual man, and that he gene rally left the house about ten minutes before four o'clock. This was about twelve o'clock, and about twenty minutes before four in the afternoon of the ism day, the defendant stationed himself with a horsewhip in his band at a batter's shop, nearly op posite the stage-door in Little Russell -street, to watt for Mr. Winston's exit from the Theatre. At four o'clock the plaintiff came into the street for the purpose of going to dinner, when the defendant in stantly crossed over and began - to horsewhip the t r aiztif,. giving him several blows across the shoal- The plaintiff, who is an elderly Gentleman, and rather low in stature, held up his walking cane to ward off the blowi,_jupon which the defendant, who was stated to be a Gentleman betwen 34 and SS years of age, of a powerful frame of body, and greatly superior in strength Co the plaintiff, changed the whip to the left hand , - and with his right hand struck the plaintiff a violent blow on the face, which blackened both his eyes. One of the spectators in terposed, and remonstrated with Mr. Glosiop upon the cruelty of so treating a man so much inferior to him in size. The defendant immediately said that the plaintiff had insulted his (Mr. Glossop's) servant, and had turned him out of the lobby of the Theatre, using the expression, " turn out the lamplighter."— In continuation, he said that he would horsewhip Mr. Winston, wherever he met him, and adding, " now you shall see," resumed the use of the whip, and struck the plaintiff several additional blows. The Fifties then separated. One witness said, that Mr. Glossop, in addressing the plaintiff, observed, " know that my servant is a Gentleman, but you are a scoundrel and a blackguard," or words to that effect. It did not appear that Mr. Winston had given the defendant any provocation at the time this outrage was committed, nor was there-iny , evidence of any previous cause of offence. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL addressed the Jury on behalf of the defendant, and admitted that they must find a verdict against the defendant, and the (wily question for them to consider was the amount of tbeir damages. In considering . that question, they must take into account the rational probability that Mr. (ilossop had received some gross insult to justify the intemperance into which he had been betrayed ; for it was hardly to be believed that he could act in the manner proved without some adequate cause. The fact was, that a gross insult had been conveyed from Mr. Winstoil to Mr. Glossop through the servant of the latter; and instead cf treating it with the con tempt it deserved, he was imprudently betrayed into this personal conflict. It was clear that he did not mean to do Mr. Winston any personal injury, for he had only ch.istisei him with a lady's horsewhip, and 'thereby only meaning to express his sense of the in sult he had received. The blow which he afterwards . gave was provoked, as he was instructed, by the plaintiff having u ed his walking-stick in his defence. The defendant, however, must submit to a verdict ; I and the Jury would take all the circumstances into 1 their consideration. The LORD ChIEF JUSTICE summed op the ease for the Jut y, and said it was an assault attended with circumstances of considerable aggravation. The plaintiff was clearly entitled to a verdict, and they would give him such reasonable and temperate da mages (in the absence of all vindictive feeling) as the justice of the case demanded. The Jury found their verdict for the plaintiff— Damages £l5O. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DECEMBER IS. POWELL, GENT. B. CAMPBELL. Mr. PLATT opened the pleadings, from which it appeared that this was an action brought by the plaintiff, an attorney, against the defendant, one of the clerks in the Custom-house, for driving his chaise against that of the plaintiff, and thereby injuring the plaintiff's wife. The damages were laid at £6OO, and the defendant had pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. Lee Thomas, a surgeon, who was called in to attend Mrs. Fowell after the accident, stated that the injury was so great that a mortification appeared likely to follow. The injury arose from one of the wheels having gone over the right leg of Mrs. Powell. Her health suffered considerably. Richard Neale, a fruiterer, residing in the City road, proved that on the evening in question he had seen Mr. Powell coming into London, at the rate of six or seven miles an hour • the road was about forty one feet broad: the defendant was going towards Pentonville at the same time; he was not then whip ping his pony at a furious rate; plaintiff was on the left side, within two or three feet of the path ; de fendant was coming from town on the same side, but nearer to the pavement than the plaintiff; he was indeed on the path; defendant's gig came in contact with Mr. Fowelrs chaise, and broke the shafts, and both plaintiff and his w ife; were thrown out. Wit ness thought defendant was in liquor, from the abusive language he used; the plaintiff's horse was a very spirited animal ; the defendant's was only a pony. Other witnesses proved the same circumstances. Samuel Dougall, a coachmaker, repaired the plain tiff's gig; the expense was nearly £l4. Mr. Serjeant If.ssuommi, for the defendant, con. tended, that the circumstances which had been proved certainly did not entitle the plaintiff to any heavy damages. He admitted that the defendant, was at the ume inebriated. The Learned Serjeant, in elucidating his argnmedt, repeated the so-often. quoted lines in cases bf this nature— " The nag of the road is a paradox quite,. " In driving your carriage along ; For if you go ilk you are sure to be rigAl, Bet if you go light, you are smog!" Lord Chief Justice DALLAS observed, that draw; kermess was no excuse for criminality, nor any de fence in civil cases, escept where the validity of con tracts was the question for the decision of a Jury. The Jury, considering all the circuafstances of the case, would be governed by sound discretion in their "mkt. The Jury consulted for about five minutes, and then gave a verdict for the plaintiff—Damages £350. VICE-CHANCELLOR'S COURT, DECEMBER ic GRAHAM V. WHITAIABSH, FRANKLIN, GRAHAM, AND OTilita& In this case an issue was directed to the Court of Ktng's Bench, in Ireland, to try whether the plaintiffs were the legitimate children of the late Major James Graham, or not. The cause was accordingly tried at the last Assizes of Cork, ands verdict was had for the j)laintifE 4 Mr. WHIMAIIIIIff o for the defendants, now moved his Honour that a new trial might be had at such time and place as his Honour should be pleased to direct. He moved on the affidavit of the defend ants' Solicitor, who attended the trial at Cork, and who, after detailing the proceedings, ste t ted, that to the best of his judgment the verdict obtained was against the weight of evidence, and that the Learned Judge who tried the case did not recapitulate the evi dence to the Jury, nor stop to notice the conflicting testimony of the witnesses produced and examined. His Himont', without going into the merits of the case, expressed his opinion that the Court acted in error when it directed the issue to the Court of King's Bench, in Ireland—the cause should have been tried in England, and the Court now, by noticing the pro ceedings had in Cork, would only go from one error to another. The verdict had for the plaintiffs in Cork, having been had under an Order, which turns out to be irre gular, must of course fall to the ground ; the case will be further disposed of on a re-hearing. OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. Saturday David Murray was. indicted for stealing 161bs. of flour, the property of W. Cochrane, a baker, at Wapping, in whose employment the prisoner was. He went out for the night, on the evening of the 12th ultimo, when he was stopped by an officer of the Thames Police, about 300 yards from his master's house, with the flour tied up in a handkerchief. On being asked by the officer where he got it? he said he stole it. The question being repeated, he gave the same answer, and asked him to take it back to his master. Mr. Cochrane said, that bakers' men always took flour to make their puddings, and he never found fault with them ; but he never allowed them to take it out of the house.—Guilty. The following were acquitted on Friday : Mary Richardson, of stealing six shoes; Joseph Ross and John Martin, of stealing a piece of bacon ; Ann Clark, of stealing two sovereigns ; Eliza Jackson and Thomas Palmer, of stealing two sovereigns • Sarah Nelson, of stealing three b la nkets ; and William Mailin, of stealing a sheet. MIDDLESEX SESSIONS. TILE KING In ROBINSON, The defendant in this case, who was convicted on Saturday se'nnight, of a fraud on the Commissioners of the Navy, received the judgment of the Court on Tuesday: he was sentenced to be imprisoned for twelve months in the House of Correction. POLICE. ITAITON-Gnawer.— Saturday. John Crooks was brought up from the House of Correction, in the custody of Wm. Read, the officer, for final examination, charged with inflicting several se vere stabs with a knife, on the person of Mary Anne Nelson with intent to murder her, or do her some bodily harm. l'h; Magistrate asked the officer if toe parish intendedto bear the expense of the prosecution ? The officer said, they would not ; but that if he was acquitted of the present charge, the parish intended to prosecute him for bigamy, as there were then three out of the seven wive. living, and two more, of whom no thing was at present known. The prisoner had debauched one of his own daughters, who was then In the Penitentiary in St. Pancras; and, to aggravate his crimes. he had his daughter then present living with him in a state of incest ! Magistrate 6. Horrible! horrible!—Young woman , you bear what you are accused with, what do you say to it " — She hesitated, and con fessed it was so. He was then conveyed back to prison. Now - s .—Saturday evening, B. Burgess, lisq. of High bury Park, Islington, was brought up in custody, accompanied by his daughter, charged with having struck Mr. Cole, the money-taker at e Pit-entrance of Covent-Garden Theatre.— Mr. Cole stated, that Mr. Burgess being very slow in pulling out his money, and there being a great presaure of company, be put his hand oa the defendant's breast very gently, and desired him to stand on one side; upon which the latter struck him a tremendous blow on the nose with his fist; and on his retreating to the back of his box, thrust his cane violently after him, and had nearly poked his eye out. 'Ms was Mr. Cole's account of the matter; lad though be had delivered it upon the usual oath, yet, to make assurance double-sure, he added, " This is the truth, I swear, by Goa!" for which he got an additional rap veer the knuckles from his Worship. In further confirmation of his statement, Mr. Cole called his attendant cheek-taker, and, according to his colouring, the whole affair was something like the scuffle between the devil and the baker, in the puppet shew t first, he saw the money-taker's hand and head pop out of the pigeon -hole, then he saw the Gentle man's hand and head pop in, and out and in, and in and out, they popped repeatedly, till at last the Gentleman popped his cane into the hole, when the money-taker got hold of it, and then it was " pull baker, pull devil," the Gentleman at one end of the cane, and the money-taker at the other, till the string, which Mr. Burgess had twisted round his wrist, gave way, and down tumbled Mr. Cale to the bottom of the hole, with the cane in his hand ! Mr. Burgess, in his defence, said, that finding he bad not sil ver enough to pay for the admission of his friend and daughter, he produced some gold, and requested change. The complain ant then rudely told him to stand on one side • and on his re fusing to do so, defendant certainly struck him ; a palpable blow on the breast, which he of course resented. The complainant therefore committed the first assault, .and he now begged to prefer that charge. Mr. Brandon, of the Theatre, with his usual urbanity, recom mended pacificatory measures, and the money-taker declared he was willing to withdraw his complaint, because the young Lady seemed so much distressed. The Gentleman, however, treated this commiseration with the mostprofound contempt, and urged the Magistrate to receive a charge of assault against Mr. Cole. Mr. bittisuutt, 'after repeated attempts to reconcile the par ties, ordered each to enter into his personpl recogulasnce, in the sum of £2O. The Rev. J. VARENNE, Rector of Staplehurst, in consequence of the very great depression of the agri cultural interest, has taken nothing for the tithes of hops in his parish for the present year. Cannot; to MOTHERL—Last week a child, of about four months old, belonging to a woman of the name of Peckham, near Lewes, cried in a:most vehe • meat manner, without any apparent cause. Th e c hild was undressed, and closely examined by the neigh hours, who thought that a pin might be the cause; when, to their utter astonishment, they found, near the child's navel, and just through the skin, the end of a common sewing needle, which had been forced by some means or other into the infant's stomach ! The needle was immediately drawn out, and the in fant is doing well. UNIVERSITY INTELLIGENCL OXFORD, DECEMBER 15: Tuesday, the Rev. James °unlock. M.A. of Merton lege, was elected Fellow of University College; and Mr. Geote, Davis was elected Scholar of the same Society, on the B ead Foundation. • " Tuesday, the following Gentlemen were *crinkled ro Dew itt YAMS 07 AZT& The Rev. Thomas Wyatt, Trinity College: CY MITS. William Drake Sealy, St. Alban's Hall. William Stratton, St. Edmund Hall. John Wetherell, lirasennose College. Edmund Philip Stock, Magdalen Hall. Edward Trelawny, (Mel College. Henry Thursby, ditto. John Williams, Jesus College. • Thomas Procter, Jesus College. Frederick Richard Stevens, Worcester College. Henry Peyton Sadler, Pembroke College. ECCLESIASTICAL PROMOTIONS. The Rcv. T. G. Roberts, Fellow of iirasennose College, pr ford, to the Rectory of Uan fiber, in the Diocese in H ato , The Rev. J. T. liurlock, D. D. of St. John's Cdliege, Cant; bridge, to the Prebendal Stall of Husbonse and Burhage, i ll t h e Cathedral of Salisbury. The Rev. H. Wilson, Vicar of Great Bedwin, and Dom i c Chaplain to the Marquis of Aylesbury, to the valuable Living of Colllngbourne Duck, Wilts. The Rev. T. Watson, M.A. to the Rectory of Mutton, all nominated to the Curacy of lisrdley, with the stipend of 4150 per antniM. . Earl Somers has appointed the Rey. Francis Coke, M.A. p re , bendary of Hereford Cathedral, to be one ot his Domestic Chap. lains. A Dispensation has also passed the Great Seal, enabling the Rev. Francis Coke to bold the Vicarage of Sellack, and die Clopelry of Rifles Capri annexed (presented to hint b y the Dean and Chapter nt I lereford Cathedral), with the Rectory a Gladcotry, Radnorshire. Tice Hair. bourse, to the Rectoty of a lp , bans, Susses. The Rev. John Webb, nrie of the Minor Canons of Gi al , eater Cathedral, to the Vicarage of Cardiff. Th e Hex. John Spurwey, to the Rectory of Pitt Portia; Tiverton. The Rev. W. I. Ilirdwood,to the Vicarage of Ilolme,De m The Rev. Alxtthew Vicars, to the Itcctory• of Allhallows, Exeter. The Rev. John Strode Foot, to the Vicarage of Liskeird, Cornwall. The Rev. Joseph Ashbridge, to the Vicarage of Ikatb, • Derbyshire. _ The Rev. R. T. :rade, to the Rectory of Mstrston %pt. Somerset. The Rev. James Mainwaring, Vicar of Cainham, near low, b.. been appointed, by the Earl Somers, our kis Lore, ship's annestic Ch4naim. _ 'Tuesday, the hey. Witham thnanr, :\. M. ore of th, parseric Chaplains of the bi.ltop of Ezetrr, Prele:nd,.ry of Eider thedral, and Rector of Sr. Petr,,cl-., in that etty, was collard te the Rectory of St. I'eter Tavy, :ti Devon, conferred on him by the Bishop, void by the death u the Itter. Cr. Moore. The Bishop of CIIESTER strongly recommends: mode adopted by himself among the married la• bourers of Wallingham, near C !vhenllec• tor of that parish. His Lordship divided a certain quantity of glebe land into allotments of ball ad single acres, and each labourer unit a large family was allowed to rent one of these all.,(11101t at 3 111C0 Berate rate. With the assistance a: I a grazing, most of them were soon able to key . a cow and a pig, to raise more than suff.&nt vege.a . iesfor their famiiies, to add materially to their comlort in many minor respects, and they were shortly ableto contribute to the parish funds, instead of being con. sumers of them. "At the same time," his Lordship observes, " the men were kept from the alehouse, their leisure time being more happily occupied in cultivating their little spot of ground. The rent was punctually paid, and the land as well, if not better cultivated than any in the parish. Spade cultiratioa is very beneficial in cases of this kind; even the ma nufacturer or artisan soon use it with ease and skill.' HERTEL Tuesday, the Lady of the Rev. N. Cole, Hurston Whatnot, of a daughter. MARRIED. medale, the Rev. Henry Fothergill, Canted p, to Miss Margaret Wharton, of Ashfold,l Wednesday, at Chedden, Somerset W. bletford, M.A. w Mary Eliza, only daughter of the late Hobart Andertoo,l4 of Jamaica. DIED. Saturday se`nnight, after a long illness, the Rev. Mr. Fah• ner, Vicar of Deddington, Oxfordshire. Aged 74, the Rev. Samuel Ryder Weston, D.D. Retued Therfield, near Royston, Herta, and one of the Prebends elk Paul's Cathedral. At Ossington, near Newark, the Rev. John anima& M.A. and late Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, ia b 80th year. At Sidmouth, the Rev. Charles Hardy, youngest son of tin late John Hardy, Esq. of Low Moor, near Bradford, sulks' ther to the present Recorder of Leeds. Wednesday, at his house in Queen Anne-street West, Sit Ru tin Browne Folkes, M.P. and F.R.S. Sunday sennight, at his house in Dun.ford-street, Stocelamt, the Lady of Dr. Isbell. In Park -street, Plymouth, Mrs. Byrth, widow, of a cance l after a long illness. Wednesday, Augustus Edward, youngest son of Mr. P. larkip t Master, R.N. After a short illness, ?Jr. James Down, surgeon, late d Oakhampton. Nov. 30, at litres, in the south of France, Marianne, e 1 daughter of the Rev. 'Moms Jones, Whitehall Chapel. Dec. 12, at Rochester, from injury sustained by a fall frog his granary, on the Saturday preceding, Mr. George Men,. wether, landlord of the NVlrite hart public-house, and formal! of the George and Dragon, Canterbury. Sunday sennight, Mary, wife of William Phillips, of Siut. row's-lane, Cambridge : her clothes caught fire from a candle on the Friday night previous, and burnt her dreadfully oa tit chest, neck, arms, and face. She was taken to the hospiul, and languished In the greatest agony till the Sunday. Dec. 9, at Bath, Mrs. Ironside, widow of the late Coital Gilbert Ironsitle. July 8, at Mysore, in his 31st year, Captain Paul Poggenrilt of the Madras Artillery. On his passage to Calcutta, where he was going to resides with Free Mariners' Indentures from the Hon. East India Caw pany, Mr. James Duncan Dallistone, aged 23,years. Saturday sennight, Henry Baron, of Longrow, near Blab burn. He was a man of uncommon strength, and his death no considerably accelerated by his own inadvertency. About in weeks ago he was drinking at a public-house in that town, is company with several persons, one of whom had a bull belsuirl to him in a field, which Baron undertook to drive to a unit field, distant about a mile, on condition of becoming the sort of the bull, and another person offering him. 20s. extra. JO° immediately pulled off his coa t, drank a glass of spirits, rod ig off to accomplish his task, which be completed, after Inki dragged by the animal, which he held by the tail, through W' fields. In accomplishing his purpose, he was thrown into s *iv lent perspiration, and whilst in that state, drank a (=side* quantity of cod water, from the effects of which be was sorb indisposed, and lingered until Saturday se'nnight. MAILS ruts DAlre-.411816 DUI • Dublin Waterford 5 3 3 3 eel° France 1 Hamburg's 1 ° Flanders 1 0 • Brazils I 0 ---, Jasbon Holland 1 0 1 0 Hl6 H-WATER at LONDON BIiIDGB TO.11(0 111)* Mcridng - - 48 minas after 8 Aftcrnonn - l5 ._ --------- _- _.--__-,--._:-.--- LONDON ; rrinced and pidllishid by Lim Kars, FAO place s Tropte-Bar. V svr N` i•a' tie A the CI the 1111 COIF WEI jo the Irons Tb *ldle To Gene! Little the 111 of Di Joao sumo llti with forme rouse M the . Th: Prop .y Ism ritti . ef Fe Ge Ana lia s.