Star. — London, England, 1823-04-29 00:00:00

at the same time, an artificial system, which tended to mislead and perplex,, rather than satisfy the in quiring mind. Our ascendancy, or rather our pre sumed ascendancy in the councils of Europe, wee alleged as one special source for gratulation ; but he Must confess that he could derive no exultation here, unless that ascendancy were supported by finan. cial arrangements at home. Instead of our ascen-, dancy in the councils of the nations, he could , clis: Cover, and must complain of the absence of all ar! cendancy in Europe. For the moment that this de.l falcation of ascendancy was discovered in us, the moment it was supposed we had declined in our na tional tone, the result, either in peace or in war, would he exactly the same—it would be equally de cisive and equllly disastrous. It was upon these grounds, tenacious of the true dignity and honour of this great country, that he could not bring himself to support the pteseat Bill. The LORD CHANCELLOR now 'put the ques tion as to. the .amendment proposed by Lord King, which was immediately negatived; after which the Bill was accordingly read a third time, passed,• and messages were direettd 0-inform the Commons of the same.—Adjourned at Half-past Six. HoUsit OF OOMMOI4S. The Report on the Bethnal green Vestry Amendment Bill was brought up, and the Bill ordered to be engrossed. Mr. PELHAM presented a Petition from Barton-on-Hum ber, against the Insolvent Debtors' Act.—Laid on the table. So the motion of Mr. D. Baovritz, Lord Oxinantown was added to the Committee on the Local - Taxation of Dublin. Mr. LA WLEY presented a Petition from certain Inhabitants oftbe County of Warwick, against the Holyhead New Road 11111.—.-Refererd to the Committee. Mr- . BUTTBR WORTH presented a Petition from certain IntAitants of Borrisokan, in the County of Tipperary, against an 'further concessions to the Catholics.—Laid on the table. e Conibitiation of Workmen'S Bill was deferred until Thursday near, on the motion of Mr. P. Mooas. The Quorum Magistrates Bill went through a Cotuntittee of en whole House; the Report was read, mud ordered to be fur ther cbtisidertd on Fr:day next. Sir N. COLTHURST presented a Petition from certain In habitants of the' City of Cork, praying for a repeal of the • Lea thee Tall.—Ordered to be printed. Mr. HUME postponed his motion relative to the removal of the Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, till Tuesday, the 57th of May. this object in postponing this motion was, that he did not wish to give any triumph to the Orange party, whom he had under- Wood to view the motion with satisfaction. The same Hon. Member gave notice of a motion for the 14th of May 'on the subject of promotions in the Navy . He also, moved for an account of the manner in which the charge flir Plate for our Ambassadors was laid out.—Ordered. Mr. GRATTAN presented a Petition from a certain parish in the County of Dublin, against the improper rates levied on them, and the misempluytneLit of the Yeomanry to collect than. The soldiers were brought in to disperse the Vestry. Mr. HUM said, it the allegations of the Petition were true, he was only astonished that the people of Ireland were not in open rebellion. Mr. DA WSON defended the Yeomanry, as a body, from act. lag improre:ly. Mr. G It A TPA N.—The Yeomanry were in their regimentals, and had their fire-arms. The Scotch :Sheriff; Court Bill, and the Scotch Commission Court Bill, severally went through a Committee of the whole IL.use.—The Report was brought up, and ordered to be further co:Adored on the nth of May next. Mr. GM LliU RN preseuted a Petition Wit .. the Dean and C.h.tpter of Peterborough, against any further concessions to the Catholics. • W. BANRES presented a similar Petition from the CI. rgy of Deroughbridge.--Ordered to ha printed. A Petition WAS presented from the borough of Sudbury, pray. leg the tuil nd effectual abolition of the Slave Trade, lair I. COFFIN said, there was an easy way of accomplishing t 4 object of the ridden.. Let the Petitioners buy out the pr‘zert proprietors, Mid skvery would be at once abolished. Lord Si ANLEY wished to correct a missonception. which took place a few evenings back, relative toe Pcdtt,on which be bad presented trees the Chamber of Commerce of Mancbetter, apeo the subject of the Union Duties. That Petition 'was in (malty of their repeal, and not, as had been stated, against it. On the Report of the Irish Militia Staff Reduction Sill, Mr. 1111./DIR said, that since the peace a million sterling bad hien expended on the Trish Militia Staff, which had never been able I for the Staff ntone County Regiment could not, in case qt einergebey, be moved' inch another.' Ile should now wisp to. *km; but he feared he* we; Pot in 'order in' doing ati,' that the Militia Staff of Ireland should be marched to any part of Ireland, t the pleasure of the Lord Lieutenant, whets their services j were.required. 'COTILTIORN wished the Hon. Member to . understand that *the .piriicular dtity of the Militia &at in time of peace . wair to guard the arms and clothing of their rmpectism regiments.— nth . aweless Wen but rarely required out of their ow.n coup : tics • but when they were wanted elsewhere; be was happy to bear tribute to , the seal with which the "ATilitia Staff had'alWays . volunteered its duty.. • air. HlLllEttimplained that theMilida Staff wet quartered In small towns, our their attar . * Woods, at an expeuselor rent, haircut of being put into barracks which wets empty, whor that charge would be Tie really wished the Right Han. °endemic would dot allobr hfinielt to be' kept in order by the Coionelsof Alilitia. The bill Was ordofed tQ be:Tetd s third tiro' it " Ticern i i ‘' Sir M. W. RIDLY prevented,* Petition from the Conlon pt Neweestle.prayinc for ilie repeal at the duty on coals iirried coastwile:—Ordefed to be Orbited. • MR. wiiirz; Mr. HUME presented a petition from a person of the name of White, Who had been twenty-nine years in a public office,•complaining of being suspended by the 13btrd of Tares, in April, 1810; in consequence of having gieen information relative to some Mal-prac tices in that department. The petitioner stated, that he bad made representations to the Commissioners of the' eX Office, which clearly proved that the nu& 1k had been defrauded in the district of Kensington to the amount of 15,0001. and offered to adduce prootto that effect, if they were disposed to examine into the subject. This offer was refused, howevei beneficial it might have been fi,und to the public ; and from that period he had to date a series of per seenti'ens, which ended in his dismissal. Throughout the whole of the Bills of Mortality, the amount of fraud on the public which had taken place amounted' to 169,0001. a-year, for which deficit the negligence of 'Government was to be blamed; for in 1821 the Petitioner had presented a Memorial to the Board, stating these enoi mous abuses. The Han. Member contended, that it was their duty to have then attended to it, instead of which the persons in place conspired against him. The petitioner was made the victim of their resentment and persecution, and, after 29 years of service, he, • with his family of ten children, were turned out on the world on the bare strength of an anonymous letter, stating that he had not charged • himself with the Window Tax on certain windows in • his own house. The case was one of great oppres sion, and he thought that Mr. Lowndes bad acted towards him with severity and unfairness, in dismis sing the petitioner without allowing him the arrears due. He intended to. make this petition the ground • of en application for an inquiry, not only in this cages but generally into eases of a similar abuse end shame. fulrukairptintriation of the public money. The Hon. Member then mond the petition should be read. the mciltice.' to be one of :y of the Hon grossly practised Avenue officer, sus pended, after , due inquiry, by tle Board of Tax!!! and, upon file - fullest investigation, the Tteisury, is the year 1819, confirmed the sentence, by dismissing officer: 'Mr. Lushingtori read theJetter to. the Board of Taxes, which proved that it was not, as stated by Mr. Hume, upon anonymous information that this punishment had been inflicted, but upon the proof ciffraud committed by this officer in making a false return of the number . of windows with which he was - legally ctrarge:ible with ditty. An officer capa ble of such an act for his own benefit, was held to be an unfit protector of the revenue; and the Board of Taxes and the Lords of the Treasury, being also highly dissatisfied with him upon other grounds, would have been justly chargeable with a gross de reliction of their duty, jf they had screened this indi vidual from the ordinary consequences of such mis conduct—dismissal from the service. Mr. Lushing ton submitted to the House that their time and-pa tience were much abused by the Hon. Member for Montrose, when it was occupied by him with cases like this ; supported only by crude opinions, formed merely upon the ex-parte statments of the individual justly dismissed. Mr.Lushington desired to assure the /Ton. Member (Mr. Hume) that he should be at all times prepared to meet him upon this case, in the House or in a Committee ; and if he did not then go more fully into it, it was not from any doubt of the entire propriety of Mr. White's removal from office, but from unwillingness to trouble the House upon a matter of such comparative insignificance, whets they were anxiously waiting for a discussion of such mar nitude. The animadversions made by Mr. Hume upon the services of Mr. Lowndes, Mr. Lushington considered to be wholly unmerited. Mr. Lushington was satisfied that the House would concur with the Government in thinking the retiring allowance which had been granted a fair remuneration to Mr.Lowndes, and a fit inciternent to others to imitate ability and integrity, which had distinguished a long life spent by Mr. Lowndes in the most zealous exertions for the benefit of the revenue. Mr. HUME denied that the affair had been loves ' ti gated ; - the sole offence was, that he had blocked the windOws up with wood instead of brick. The whole proceeding was a species of revenge executed on this individual, who had rendered himself liable to the ill will of those in higher departments of office, from hiv ing detected abases and peculation' in their conduct. Mr. BENNET supported the. petition. Mr. LUSHINGTON said, he•wished to open the eyes of the Hon. Member opposite, if possible. The fact was, that independent of the fraud practised, the Board had great reason to be dissatisfied with his, conduct in other respects. Mr. White was removed in 1817 from the Uxbridge division to Kensington; out of consideration to him and his family, because it had a More liberal allowance and larger salary, and allowed him to carry on his trade. Various repre-. sentations were afterwards made to the Board of the vexatious prose-dings of this officer, and of the amount of his groundless surcharges, as excessive and generally oppressive. Mr. H'U - ME said, it was now clear that calumny had been 'at work, since the Right Men?* had now mentioned other causes of complaint otit speeilled before. No one bad. committed himself more completely than the Right Hon. Gentleman, by thepublie testimony which he had given to this. Gentlemans character. He (Mr. Home) denied' the truth of all the facts alleged against him, which he denominated a scandalous persecution against the individual, and pledged himself to prove it. Mr. T. WILSON' thought the Petitioner had been rather hardly' used in dismissing him, whose sole of fence seemed to consist in opining these sic windows two months within the' time within which he was so entitled to do by law. The Petition was ordered to be printed. Mr. HUME was abollt to mOve for Pmpers on this subject, when Mr. CANNING said, he certainly could not' per mit thii ifintian for papers without giving. a previous notice, as it might lead to a debate. - Mr. HUMS said, he should of coarse, then, move for them tomorrow. • Mr. LUSHIRGTON stored the Non. Member he should feel confident . in being• able to refute the allegations of the Petitioner upon - the prOthtttion of those Papas: aS o 1 Sr W. DE C PlG;trfljTcond•4 ritteirinft of tee. cwteotisi f. tiiiiikan7iTistimices in wbieit thooedulit] Member for Montrose had Tr gross ; upon. . This seas the case of . -tevenue CAPTAIN StA WIT. - .- - Mr. CURWEN presented a Petition from Captain Manby of his . Majesty's Royal Navy, stating that he had devoted his attention 'for several• years to ma tuiing the means of preserving the valuable lives of seamen wrecked, or otherwise' endangered through accident at sea. After a tew observatinns on the subject, in which the Hon. Member stated that the Petitioner had been promised the recommendation of the Right Hon, the Chancellor of the &chequer' to the House, as a proper persnn to receive a renme• ration . for his' valuable services; The CH ANOELLOR of theEXCHE4llls,llstuted that he certainly hid,been applied to, and had said that he had expressed his high opinion Of the gallant Officer in question ai a shipwright and an Otter of .considerable talent and information. He had said also that he would refer the subject of his claim to „the House; bin he had never staled that he should or should not recommend stick a claim, which he did not think himself called on to do. After a few observatieni from Mr. Wowsnowss and Sir 1. Cowl, the Petition' was read ana ordered to be printed. . Alter LR Mr. M. 4. TAYLOg stud, a report having gone abroad thit some 044 were taking id the other flOnie to expedite appeals there, hq wished to'ask the Right Hon. the Secretary. far the Home Department when such Ida:nation on the sidieet might probably be laid on the table of the House of Carismoni as would throw some light on the nature of the change intended to be effected in the appellpt torisdiction? Mr. fiecretaii ?EEL observed, that from the very Gatlin of the proceeding instituted wit - ls respect to this change, he could not Lit?!,:jbly gibe toy infOrma tion oft the snkject... ,The Lions! of Lords lied ap pointed a Critnasittei to air:dine the sahjict, asd until it was koowts what their Report would be, it i: . % • , _to say with certainty what migist lse _ . -,.. • . etfi measuv proposed. • •""- e few words frs•Mr.lll. A. TAYLOR/ ~ ~ r. Vrti f LIAMS gaie- notice, that he would, en Wednescla.y sen night, bring'forward a Motion oh thel sebjeCt 4f these Courts: life EVANS presented a petition from the Inhabitants of due ' neighbourhood of Derby, praying that %lavery might be abo lished in the West Indies.—Ordered to be printed. A message was brought from the Lortis, announcing their Lordships' assent to various Bills. The second reading of the Peer Laws Amendment BM was postponed till to-morrow. THE LATE NEGOCIATIONS. . Mr. MACDONALD rose to bring forward his motion relative to the late negotiations. No one, he said, appeared either to expect or to desire that coin munications of such vast importance as those whiCh had lately been presented to the House, and which, he trusted, had found their way to the hands of all his Majesty's subjects, and in which every person who perused them must have found matter to induce him to cling to the liberties he enjoyed with redoubled zeal and devotion; no one expeoted that communi cations of such e nature could have remained so long on their table unnoticed. It had been well, indeed, that they should have so remained till the surprise they'had excited had somewhat abated. The disgust occasioned in every British mind by reading them would never subside; even though they should re main unnoticed and undisturbed on the table till they should be buried in dust. The surprise had now somewhat subsided ; and he rose to call the attention of the House to their conttpts. During the late war, a war commencing-in 1793 and finishing in 1815, every Briton had declared that the neck of the Spa nish people should never be made a footstool to a French Ruler, whether that Ruler was a Bourbon or A Bonaparte; but now we. had changed our position.. —We, dining that war, acted up to our professions: now we had substituted professions for facts; and whatever the' Right Ilonourable Oritlemen might think, we did not now stand exactly in the situation of Cesar's wife. In 1812, Spain found herself under the necessity of reforming her Constitution, and on that occasion the Despots of the North were most for ward to acknowledge it in its regenerated form, and the great Autocrat of Russia pronounced upon it that cabilistical epithet e legitimate." In 1814, when Fer dinand was restored to the Throne, his first act of gratitude, for the blood wasted to support him, was the overthrow of liberty ; while himself continued the slave of bigots and monks, he proceeded to exile, incarcerate, and, he believed, to execute some of . those very persons who had distinguished them selves in the liberation of their country. In 1820, however, the fabric of tyranny, thank Goof fell' to the ground. Portugal soon followed the noble example set by Spain, and the Peninsula was free. It was not to be expected that such a change could be effected without divisions and without resistance. The wonder was, how slight that resistance had-been till France had recourse to that worst and most dis graceful species of warfare, that of exciting insurrec tion by her money and her intrigues. These insur rections were charged as a Crime on Spain, and were made the feigned pretence of continuing an Army of Observation on her frontiers. In 1821 the Emperor of Russia bethought himself of what he had previously ,done. New lights broke in upon him, and he pub lished a Manifesto, di s approving of w hat he before ;designated as - legitimate. Lord Londonderry, upon this occasions presented a Note found among his pa pers, many partsof which did him eat credit. The !Emperor of Russia, not finding his proppsal warmly received, did not press it further at the time. He begged to say a word or two on the divisions which were said to exist - in Spain. There had been some. thing thce malignant exaggeration in the description of them. Divisiops, no doubt, existed ; but did they not also exist in France? No revolution was ever effected without division. Our own glo rious Rerdlution had not been accomplished with Out two civil wars; but he did not be -1 lieve - there was any new division of parties in Spain. 'How did .parties - stand in Spain ? He believed on one side was all the landed property, and, he might almost say, all the People; on the other side, a few bigotted Nobles, the greater part of the Priesthood, and a small portion of the most ignorant of the po -pulses. The Right Hon. Gentleman (Mr. Canning), in presenting the Papers, seemed to anticipate great advantage over those pugnacious individuals who are inclined to return no answer but a blow. Could the Right Hon. Gentleman discover no alternative, no mode of making this country respected in negotia tions, but by threats of hostility? The first question they had to ask was, whether they had done their duty as men ?—thesecond, whether, if they had done so, - and failed, they should have recourse to war? It was only with the first question he - had to do that night. His charge against the Government was, not that they did not precipitate them into a war, but that they did nothing in right season to preserve peace. They acted from chimerical apprehensions of war, and for that rea son exposed them to the peril of being dragged into it. Before he sat down he should chew that in the course of the negotiations they totally lost sight of the dig nity of the country, and held it out to the world in a ridiculous and contemptible light. For two years and a half our Government was in total ignorance of all that was passing between France and Spain, while we were communicating all that was passing be tween us and Spain to France. He wondered 'whe ther we were also ignorant of all that was passing between France and - Russia? The Duke of Welling ton wrote home for instructions, and he is told by the Right Hon. Gentleman that, “ If there be a deter mined project to interfere by force or by menace in the present struggle in Spain, so convinced are his Majesty's Government of the uselessness and danger of any such interference—so objectionable does it ap pear to them in principle, as well as utterly imprac ticable in execution, that when the necessity arises, or (I would rather say) when the opporninity offers, I am to instruct your Grace at once frankly and peremptorily to declare, that to any such interference, come what may, his Majesty will not be a party."— This language seemed strong, but it was one of those things called a parturient mentor. He expected from the Right Honourable Gentleman something more decisive. He expected he would have thus written to the Duke of Wellington :---,, Lose not a moment. Deprecate such a proceeding in the strongest terms. Protest against it as a gross violation of all interne tionallaw, a most unjustifiable outrage, repugnant _to al) principles of justice. Say, that not only will his Majesty not interfere in it, but that, ir. wi,ati vo Councils such a proposition mUy be made, his Mi, joky will feel it necessary to withdraw fibs them". 4 (Heir. hear). — The French Government • k‘; /lid hav e been:reminded of all that they owed to A ~1 ties our "Cmtinental connection was formed to stettn the independence of nations; and that the King* • Engli'md, free as the air of Heaven, would sanction, but would oppose, any attempt to into fere with the rights of men, and or kin g d,,,,t,, The Duke of Wellington set out from Paris for 1 ri k rona. He knew not whether it was espicted that should approach the.august assemblage of V e an e with awe. He would do so when he saw di ng , narchs begin to remember that they were men; w he - saw them deliberating for the happmeA and fret. troth Of their subjects, who were men also; theta wai t ' ' , only time that a Member of the Senate c o at approach them with awe. and kiss thehem of their Is; penal garment. But, while they tutee cornp; against all that was dear to mankind, he would dea t ; nate them by no other name then that of tyr.ntr;, With respect to the appointment of the Duke of lington to Verona, he was not dispose,l to find with that selection; for he saw in the Noble D not only a person thickly covered with the bad honour, earned in the success of those exertions secured their thrones—but because he felt the, recognise in-him a breithing record of what he done, because by him it was done, fOr lighting the war of its independi a negociittor, instructed - Could not fail to.have the e Sovereigns. But there in such a proceed' Plain speaking on the 'nut her policy. Fra svard declarations, and were the characteristi hear). Was it . the cal iysed the Noble Duke existing in any may'. displayed but a little of energy which . he was sition to the meditate. the massacre of its free , ing on, would have bees At Verona the same Noble Duke Duke as to the , breaking out between the support the former spire v. ith salutary di countries. What Nit the manner in which tish Plenipotentiat y shot. bounden ditty, the momerri verted to, to have said, 'pain is not represent exists a Treaty, that of p. rantees that no interference concerns of foreign formal invitation on cirri, reservation of their therein, either direct! Why was not that do, who read these docun because the Noble Di whether, if war Wai would be the aggressor. would the Minister , pf late times, Chatharr arzion as that of the Pry kinguished Burleigh rvr 'at its annunciation, an: ,significant mark al hi :Plenipotentiary iieoul his head at we'.ittsismti had made. . The Nig with the infereace, th: otelre, in a false positir to disguisi the real proe, was, however, speedi'_ artfully woven, was desti 'that with no light ham: ing Resolutions of the Gentleman then went of the late negociations, had been laid before Par Ministers hid, bz their chance* we had of prevent firmness and decision ► The first thing the Br' propose a mediation. eider the vacillating and then to say whal would not have prevent what was our mediation ter (Lord F. SOmerset Duke of Wellington's advising them to giv, and nations. Of the si need say nothing. Th, sting) had savelliim as hostile to the-spirit fugal took the honest part speech, while we neither said anything about it. as it had been described with genuine British feel thing to arbitrate, whi another to lend all our interfered in behalf of to adopt a Constitution country. San Miguel, patriot, that Spain wont tution should emanate He also complained have reflected upon another friend ; but the. lustre be -tarnished by even tempt was 'made by iSpanish nation to make withholding from the the hostile designs of all on one side, and the British Minister, it be knew could never be teaubriand demanded berg, &c. as the price Mr. Canning demands of Spain should be gr renting that, M. San Constitution the person We also demanded an Spanish Constitution, • _ Right Hououtablc .GentlfAil` wary covered with the badges o f e success of those exertions ~hid s—but because he felt they nrui reathing record of what an& him it was done, f,r Spa m , q is independence-4am*. Suti :ted as he ought to have Iwo, e a very powerful influence with iut what need, be would ask, nit eediug of any admit diplous.tcy re part of England was lie, dray rankneis, , candour, straightfin. nd an unshaken Jeri ion-they , tics • of • her interfete..ce-yiko vi oldness of the Cabinet tidier* 's exertions?' Was time 4 k ilt* V•mind, that if 'the-Nobl e g,k 2 , of - that spirit, deteruittaina, and s wont to dei in the field, to o v p o . ed aggression arzai.c-8 1 ,.,i i; sec peol,le, ‘Atich w.,C ;.a.+. c , r been au ern pled ?—(llent,Acor ! queries ser e suloottied in . e other Allies, in the tventria. , en France and Spain and as . , ter would receive, in order W . ,. - I dread the lievolutiooias of .1 . lonsieur de Villcle expected by i 1 hi,•question. %vete p o t. theM. I should have re,di,ed. It .1) kill 1 moment the state. f Soda wa s li. i lid—•' We can give nu amoeba I rented at this Coni,ress.; • - of Aii-la•ChaPelle. which go; i ference shalt takepiaLe *ids 6 t States, but in pursuance di 4 their part. and midi'. thee:vet 1 - rigbt of duvet partic.parits 4 :tly or by Plenivnten;iaries"- II one? It rya. hot, as eves); - i invents %%mild at once pe;Cri - 1 Duke did not ',tetrad to kn' ' 8 as to occur, France or S 7 ..., essor—(Cries of Hear, heart. ' sisters Hutleigh, Godrilibiu, all i am, have received such a poi Pre.nch Government? The di' A would at least h a vox shook kis lira C Ind -a illialff i i•Om him x , as on i. . • his: (Uh l li i s ere-,.but of our .: 4 uld - mit be said that hear. •. • p rminabledeclaraticat dray --; ' 1 1 1 ' Noble LlUke .conteraed Infutr... b hat we should have placed ear I tion. What an unnecessary • • procedure!' The veil of Asa+ • • i lily' upraised —the• flue . %ch, • • a 0 destined to be torn a-ide, • • st ind—for forth came the tho. , • h the Holy Alliance. The Bop 0,.„ t into a long and luniinnh • ter . .. : /RS, as exhibited in the Papers :.` I. Parliament. tie cootesakd eir fitr, given away the 4 I Iti venting %car, by not acting I • 1 1 becOmeng the ria4nal . •• - British govertunatt Al was • He called rut it ' y conduct of fiviaitillf • .• thee a firmer tone amain p •••...i. rented, the way withipain?' ! ' tion? Why, that a special M''' •• • al et) was sent to Madrid rl . ll ' ' i ii 's compliments -to his old •• -.. • • ye up all that was ckar,t,_ • lti speech of the King of • ' he Right Hon, frentlemea , ..‘ . the trouble, by cliaract : •••• • • :of the British Com • ••• • . ' t part of protesting •: '. • •1 either asked for explan .... t. This•wata complete tree .• • . 1 , 1 ibed to be by his Noble • - PI fr feeling; and warlntb Ii was .. ; which . implied imparti#gt* . I ur la _good offices to one re .. d• France,•to prevasl o l o ' Id on similar to that of thaw .111 gel, however, smith lat . • to ould never allow that bee' il p rte from L mother country, as • ". , :of the Spanisheatme Wel ' its rte and Kig mig . cad lit of France, • .• .. 1 is a just complaint.. RAI Lo r Sir W. : ll"Court, to added It mike concession/ to• F 1104.. • IN e Spaniards 11l that he . . 4.4 P F France. This 'vat - • MI never intended to ~ •.. re at Madrid ? held out t . . , at be conceded by Simi* . 1 _ to 1-a Law on the Press, w ' e lb e of the forbearance ofile_ so ids that the safety d thel i ! IN ter 1 Miguel declared .-. ;uaranteed; and, In ts itead at 4 7 0 11 on of the King war mer ha an aaniesty for tl, rebeisw• rear apsi tliiit,4l Val) te4; .. Sal or Io .