Star. — London, England, 1822-11-01 00:00:00

OLD BAILEY SESSIONS. Yesterday, John Ilibbert was indicted for stealing four silver spoons, the property of Jane Duff. The prosecutrix is a widow Lady, and the prisoner, was her servant about six weeks. Three weeks ago she miiseJ her spoons. Edward Reed, an officer of Hatton Garden, re ceived the prisoner and a dessert spoon in charge by Mr. Ramsey, 3 pawnbroker, on suspicion of having stolen them. The prisoner at first said it was his mother's, but afterwards confessed that he took it and others from a Lady at whose house he went to clean knives and boots. Verdict—Guilty. John King, a stout young fellow of a sailor, was indicted for stealing nine conch shells, three wretched pictures, two tea-pots, a mustard-pot, &c. &c. the property of Mary Scully, an unfortunate girl, at Shad well, whom he had known for five years. He had come home with the girl drunk, left her asleep, and haring . stolen her property, was stopßed with it, and sec tired.—Guilty. Fanny Kenyon was indicted for stealing 15 silk purses, the property of Joseph Glaskin, her master. The property was found in her box, and the Jury found her Guilty. William Camden was indicted for stealing a pint pot, the property of James Clark, a publican. He was seen taking the pot by Mr. Clark's servant, and another pint pot belonging to Mr. James, a publican alio in the same neighbourhood, was found up his jacket sleeve. Verdict—Guilty. Richard Farren was convicted of stealing a petti ceat.and an apron, the property of W. Bowser. He was observed taking the articles off a line, and was taken with them in his posSession. He had only been discharged from the House of Correction the day before. Mary Long and Mary Jones were indicted for stealing three sovereigns, the property of Immanuel Jacquet. The prisoners are unfortunate women, and as the pro ecutor was passing the house in which they lived at Stepney, they pulled him in and robbed him. He was a little in liquor. Verdict—Both Guilty. Conrad Steiger was indicted for stealing nine gal lons of ale, and nine of beer, the property of S. Pratt. The prosecutor is a sugar-baker, and the prisoner was in his employment. A person, named Furnell, asked the prisoner some questions about brewing, as he was about to brew. The prisoner told him he had no need to do that, as he was going to brew on the following morning, and if he (Purnell) pleased, he would furnish him with some of his brewing. He understood from many persons in the neighbourhood that the prisoner was a partner with Mr. Pratt. Fur nell agreed to the prisoner's proposal, and soon after sent and received from him the cask of ale and the cask of beer, for which he paid him 16s. as for two bushels of malt and 21bs. of bops. The prisoner, in his defence, declared that he pur chased the malt and hops, and only brewed the ale and beer for Purnell, when he brewed for Mr. Pratt, his master. Verdict—Guilty. The Counsel for the prosecution stated that there were four other indictments against the prisoner to a large amount, but on them he should offer no evidence. William Prior was indicted for stealing a quantity of lead from the roof of the City Farm-house fur re fractory poor, at Islington. The prisoner was a pauper, employed in going on errands. During the late rainy week there the water came through the roof of the women's ward. The foreman went up, and the prisoner followed him; when the former found that all the lead had been rent off the building all round to the extent of 145 feet, and three pans of it earned away. Much of it was folded up to be carried off also. The prisoner acknowledged that he had cut off same of it, to re pair other parts. Verdict—Guilty. The Rs:col:DEß immediately sentenced him to seven years transportation. 2. Berry was indicted for stealing a quantity of linen and plate, the property of G. Gafford. The prosecutor is employed by James Weale, J. Cardan, and C. Ward, to keep a warehouse for letting out goods in Edward -street, Portman-square. He was sent to No. `2, Park -street, Grosvenor-square, to a Mr. I'. Berry. The house was fit for a Nobleman, and Mr. Ben y had taken it for a twelvemonth cer tain. Ile made inquiries into the characters of the parties, which were answered satisfactorily. He then sent sheets, damask table cloths, half a dozen silver table, and a dozen tea-spcons, which were to be paid 10s. 6d. per week for the loan of them. They were delivered on the Bth cf October, 1821. He had not then sem either Mr. or Mrs. Berry, but only the housekeeper. The next week the hire was paid, and a pair of sheets and pillow-cases returned, and an order given for six more table-spoons for one night's use only. He sent three days after for the spoons, but they wet e not brought back, and they had never been got since; nor did be receive any more money for the things. In five or six weeks after he applied for the amount of the bill to Mrs. Berry, but he got neither the money nor the goods. He called in a few days after, determined not to leave the house till he saw the prisoner. Ile bad been there about an hour and a half when Berry came in, and the servant said . to him, " I am glad you are come, Sir, for this man has got into the house, and has behaved very ill in deed." Berry walked up into the drawing-room, and asked him to follow. Witness told him be was come for his employ er's'goods, and the hire of them, and that he would not go without them. Berry said his wife was in thecountry, and had the goods locked up, but she would return on the Saturday, and they should be returned and the hire paid. He felt dis satisfied; and . still said he would not go away; on which the prisoner produced a pocket-book with bills to the amount of about 2,0001. He picked out one of the smallest, which was, he said, only for 1,501. and which the witness was to hold as a security until the following Saturday. He took it and went away. The bill purported to be drawn by Thomas Coates, and accepted by John May, of Trinity-square, Alders gate-street. The prisoner wished to endorse it; but witness said lie would not put it in circulation. He, called on the Saturday, and several times after, but never saw the prisoner until the Sd of October this year. There is no Trinity-square, Aldersgate, but a Trinity -court, and at No. 6, there he found a John' lode/ in a garret. Saw Mrs. May, who had ig the stairs, but she would not let him husband. He found the prisoner at a house in the Edgeware-road, which he had I - ~ i • • taken for twelve months attain also, - and had )tiro ' would bleak the. chininey.g'ass, and .everything. *else, I taken into custody. Mr. Berry insiste d then, and be-1 if she did not give her some gin. She took the pro-1 fore the Magistrate, that he had never seen witness be- petty out of the back parlour. ' fore until the bill was produced, and then he faltered. I The COMMON Ses.reanT finding that the name of But he only then believed that he had seen witness , the prosecutrix was spelt . Macey in the indictment, Once before. When Berry was searched, some waste ' directed the Jury to acquit her; and admonished her paper, fourpence-halfpenny, and a metal chain, with to be carefulot committing such an outrage in future. no watch at the end of it , were found on him. y 'Vol Guilt. The following were also acquitted : I Sarah t Wnitehead,.aged . twent r two; Frederick House. aged The porter of the prosecutor pr ov ed the deli ver y , Ilea Williams, aged nineteen ; and Charlotte of the goods at the house in Park - street , but Lever Randall, 1 , aged t forty-one. saw the prisoner or his wife. Sentence of Death was then passed on the follow- Ann Sawyer is proprietor of the house N 0.2, Park- i ng p r i s on street, and had the good fortrtne to let it , in October, William prisoners : Croucher, Charles Bennington, Theodore Constan -1821, to Mr. and Mrs. Berry, at 1901. per annum.— line, Edward M•Williams Thomas Fearby, William Whitton, They said they came from Worcester, and referred William Leicester, John&try, and Samuel Raven, for stealing in dwelling-houses . ; William Holland and John Barnett , for her to fall and Brookbank , in Adam -court, hack of entering t h e dwelling, with intent tii steal; John Smith and the Bank, whom they represented as their agents. — George Brindle, for burglariously breaking and stealing; Wm Berry said he was a gentleman coming to reside in Townsend, alias Pocock, and John Burrows, for highway rob town with his aunt. She went to Adam-court,Throg. beries ; Edward Edridge, for a rape; and Henry Day, for morton-street, and Brill and Brookbank gave Berry fisin te g i the o lla c li u m , iatrikt.he course of his address to the unhappy an excellent character. They had chambers. She convicts, said there was one individual amongst them (Townsend never got her rent, nor could find Brill and Brook- was here alluded to) who had, in the wickedness of his heart, bank afterwards. Berry and his wife• fled before threatened to charge an innocent person with d a c . r l im d e h whieli Quarter-day, and only their maid-servant was there, th ought which h ss i c i h t h such hono r; ana and ccusation a m val ust naturally of cou t i h d e o d n r l e y adt t l h ; who left the house when witness came there. She create, even in the mind of the bravest man, to carry on a regu shewed witness a letter, that she was to meet her mis- lar system of plunder. To that individual the Court would most tress, on which witness sent a girl with the maid to earnestl y recommend ae immediate :End an earnest appe. , l for find ' Mrs. Berry, but the maid contrived to give the merc y to that q uarter feet% which alone he could expect it. Mercy In this world, the Court feared, could not be granted to girl the slip, and she never saw her after. • him"; and it was only by sincere repentance that he could hope This was the case for the prosecution. for its extension hereafter. There were some others to whom The prisoner, in his defence, said he never saw the he would also strenuously recommend a similar preparation; he goods, never ordered them, or caused them to be or - meant those w hohad gone about with others in a gang, for f the purpose the leo y knew,dcfp l u n de r i ng rngpersons, that an might, r dared ; and Mrs. Berry told him that she had never aught , an act of plunder committed' seen or ordered them.—He called no witnesses. upon them woul d bas such , be their absolute ruin. The REG-oilman was about to sum up the evidence, The following sentences were tlien also passed : when the Jury wished to save him the trouble ; but To be Transported for Life—William Richard, James Smith, he told them that he must make an observation on the Francis Hughes, alias Want, and Frederick Stone. law of the case. Here the goods were delivered up F u r s,, F r seovuertnee Year s — Good man Years—Diary rnun Perr l y a nd John onlon Lam b. law Jo h n imb. Bailey, Eiica without the knowledge and consent of the owner, and beth Cannon, James Fennell, John Lacey, John Waters, Mary if the prisoner did not at the time of hiring them con- Morris, William Facet', Sarah Johnson, Ann Brown, James . G rh oodwin s iv :Il l ' Thomas Ballinger , Thomas Short, Richard Fallen, template the making away with them, he could not be found guilty of stealing. If they thought that he Byron ' , Margar e tibraanAliu'ripliohymasiviarf'"Jiso'neGs,eovvrglf:laloais >e y :h W o i I I % i v a c n o i intended to dispose of them, for which he employed Smith, Neil Douglas, and Thomas Berry. fraudulent pretences to get the goods into his posses. Thirteen to be imprisoned bootie year in the House of Cor sion, then they might find him guilty of felony. rection, seven for six months, one for four months, eight for three months, seven for two months, and six for one mouth.— The Jury believing this, found him—Guilty. Five of these to be whipped. The RECORDER called him up for judgment. He Three to he imprisoned for 14 days in Newgate. said the prisoner stood in great danger, for if the bill Seven, who had been found guilty, were discharged. had been put into circulation he would have been The Sessions were then adjourned until Wednesday liable to be indicted for forgery, and would have been the 4th of December next. convicted, unless he could have proved the hand writing of the drawer and acceptor ; and, if be even could have done that, it was clear they were mere men of straw, and would all have been liable to have been indicted for conspiracy. The sentence of the Court on him for this impudent fraud was, that he should be transported for seven years, and, if ever he should return to this country, he warned him to be careful how he entered into such dangerous experi ments in future. Prisoner—l have lost 1,0001. by Brookbank. Reconnea—Where is Brookbank? Prisoner—He is gone to America. lam convicted for things which I,never had. RgeortDEß.—There is no one in Court that believes that. He then directed that the bill, given by the prisoner to Gatford, should be delivered over to the Sheriff, that he might destroy it, to prevent the possi• bilk) , of any improper use being made of it in future. John Smith and .Elizabeth Dowling were indicted for stealing five sovereigns, the property of T. Bowen. The prosecutor is a seaman. On Michaelmas Day he saw the female prisoner in the street, at Shadwell. He had known her about six or seven years ago, and she now took him to her house. He had received his wages the day before. He sat on the foot of the bed, and soon fell asleep. At that time there was no one in the room but him and her. About dusk the man prisoner awoke him, and asked him what was his bu siness, and who brought him there? Witness an swered, " a girl," and said he would not leave the room until an officer came, because he had been robbed. He found that out by putting his hand in his pocket, when Smith awoke him: Another man came in with a light, and gave him rum and beer to drink. The woman went away, and the two men wok him by the arms, and turned him out of doors. He then told the watchman what had been done to him, and he brought the officer, who found the pri soners in bed together. Ann Garbatt, lives at a public-house in Fox's-lane, Shad well, and saw the prosecutor folio" ing Dowling, at one o'clock on Michaelmas Day. He was at that time very drunk. Dowling then said to witness, that she wished to leave some money with her, which she had received from a friend, whom she had known six or seven years, and who had just returned from sea. Dowling made no secret about the money ; and when witnessireard of the alleged robbery in the evening, she went to the constable and gave him the money she had lodged in her hands. Spooner, the constable, found the prisoners on the bed, both very much intoxicated. Witness received three sovereigns out of the five which Dowling had left with Mrs. Garbatt. Dowling, in her defence, said, that the prosecutor gave her the money to purchase some things for herself. Smith said, he knew nothing about the matter. He went into the house intoxicated. Several witnesses gave him an excellent character as an industrious man. He is a coal-whipper. The Jury immediately acquitted Smith ; but found Dowling Guilty. li've. Mitchell was indicted for embezzling five so vereigns, the property of D. Harrow. The prosecutor is a packing-case-maker in Prince's street, Covent-garden. The prisoner was his errand. boy. He sent him for some money in August, 1821 ; bat the lad was se altered that he could not swear to bins. ! His son, however, swore to him as being the person who was sent to Mr. Jupp, a hatter, for five pounds doe for boxes. Prisoner never returned. Mr. Jupp's son proved, that he paid five pounds to a per son from Mr. Harrow; but he did not recollect the prisoner was the person. Prisoner had been but two months in Mr. Harrow's service when be absconded. Verdict.-Guilty. Theoonstable took him in a public•house, among the enlist shocking company. The ItIiCJRDER imme diately, as the only way to save him from an untimely cad, sentenced him to seven years transportation. Mary. 4u Pearm was indicted for stealing a lace frill, and a lace cap, the property of Anil Mercer. On Michaelmas-day she knocked at the prosecu tries.door, and when it was opened by one of the ser vants, she rushed into the parlour, and swore the INSOLVZNT DEBTORS' COURT, OCT. 30. uilLy-cuurx, beeni May, l od ging go up to her t furnished boas CURIOUS CASE. George Charpentier came up to be beard on his petition to be discharged, and was opposed by Mr. HEATH on behalf of Mr. Thomas Marshall. The insolvent is a Frenchman, who had been charged before the Lord Mayor in the month of flay last, with having taken up and kept one hundred so vereigns that had been dropped by Mr. Marshall on London Bridge. The evidence produced before the Lord Mayor being thought insufficient to support the charge of felony, Mr. Marshall was advised to arrest the insolvent for the money as a debt, which he ac cordingly did; and he now opposed his discharge on the ground that the debt had been fraudulently con tracted. The insolvent was examined through an interpreter, and stated that he lived in Paris, and came to this country first in the month of _Armory, with butter for sale, next in the month of March, with onions, and last in the month of May with butter, when he was arrested. Ile positively denied having found the money for which he was arrested, or that he had any knowledge of it. Mr. Lyon, a clerk in the Bank, proved his having cashed a hundred pounds note for Mr. llarhall on the 12th of March. _ _ _ Mr. Marshall proved his having put the hundred sovereigns he received in a, bag, and into his pocket ; and that he walked with his wife to Tooley-street, where be missed the bag and sovereigns ; he knew he had them a little time before he reached London- Bridge. He advertised them the same day, and in about a fortnight after heard from Mr. Bryant, a shopkeeper, in the Borough, who is since dead, that a Frenchman named Chavalier, could give bins some account of the money. Thomas Chavalier deposed, that he is a French man, living in London, and acts as interpreter and assistant to French merchants, who bring butter, eggs, kc. to this country. In the beginning of March the insolvent came to this country, with onicns, and engaged the witness to assist him, at Ss. 6d. per day. On the 12th of March they were passing along Lon don Bridge together. Mr. Marshall and his wife were about a yard before them ; a small bag fell from Mr. Marshall, and a number of sovereigns flew out of it. Witness called to Mr. Marshall, who did not hear; and the insolvent desired him not to call again, and said he would satisfy witness. They both gathered up the sovereigns, and the insolvent took them all, still telling the witness he would satisfy him. A number of passengers saw them gathering up the money ; and some said, that Gentleman (the insol vent) has plenty of sovereigns. The insolvent soon after brought him (the witness) a gold ring and some clothes, and gave him fifteen shillings in money; and in five or six days after he left London for France. In a day or two after the insolvent left London, the witness told the story of the sovereigns to Mr. Bryant, and a French egg-merchant who lodged in Mr. B.'s house. Mr. Bryant brought Mr. Marshall to the witness, and he told him the same story ; he always told it the same way. Mr. Marshall and the French egg-merchant cor roborated the witness's statement, as to the time of his giving the account, and his always relating the facts in the same manner. The shopkeeper from whom the gold ring was bought, 'moved the fact of the insolvent having pur chased the ring for Chavalier on the day he stated. The Commissioners having conferred together for some time, The CHIEF COMMISSIONER said it was always with regret he differed from either of his Brothers ; ever he did, if yielding his opinion would be in fa vour of the liberty of the insolvent, he alWaYs yielded it ; but when doing to would have the contrary effect, he thought it his duty to act on thekest judgment he could form. In the present case, his (Learned Brother on the Bench (Slr. Commissionev ,Bowen) was satisfied with the evidence, but he acted on the same principle in favour of the insolvent. Ile (Chief Commissioner) felt suck doubts on the evidence, that' if he were a Juror trying the insolvent for feli,?ity, he - weuld be bound..t* acquit him; . and .he ennsi iere I himself equally bound. to allow tare iusolvent to b Ave the benefit of those, doubts in that Court, espcci4lly ac the fraud of which the insolvent was accused would subject him to the severest judgment the Court had the power to pronounce. The insolvent was then declared entitled to the benefit of the Act, and ordered to be discharged. 111.110a0:33R-ST at —Artatti gaillri Of /MOMS% 011OITAalt Of IT4es CANT TINFATRICA L aaOEll.—A few days since a case I a la IL: to I di tress warrant came unie: the toga; tree of this Magistrates, and, on investigatiug it, a discovery was made, that a number of disorderly persons of both sexes eshibited a& a place called the Camden rheatre, in the Regent's Pink. ts & Wednetcl ,y night the whole of the Police establishment of this OMee, assisted by others of the posse consitalus. went thither to set their parts, and, by art arrangement, to enter dill's-rent par's of the House at the Lime time, they not only secured the heroirm sitel heroes of the Muse, but also the audience, amounting to 2. p:rsotts. The Play was the Tionemeen, and the Beautiful Not and the &Mites Return were to follow; but the officers airier* juat iu tin:e to join the Ilinteystoon danea, and such a tcene cs confusion cannot be in reality described. The and knee }nit flew on the stage, the Ade afranta lost his hat, jufeetut's p . .. e of feathers was picked up in the orchestra, Lionprie rot ap t' e chimney. and /Wanda mounted to the summit of the Gies. Tait principal male performers, ten in number, were firm examined. Th e fi r st who stood prominent was Odell, who, it turned out, took a joint benefit upon tins occasion. Several other persons wer_ examined, who declared that thee were not aware that their conduct was illegal, and some of theta denied having acted at all. All the performers were fined one s hilli ng e ach, and discharged, as were about 90 of the audience, t h e w h o l e of whom were of the lowest description. The N 13.- g i strate se verely reprimanded them for their improper conduct, and stated that a repetition of their offence would subject them to serious Punislml?". Bow-sweet.—Semsenn v. Ereleit.-.-This was a proceeding against Mr. Beasts, a nicely-powdered, spruce old personage, of some three-score years or thereabouts, for an assault upon a pretty young woman named Mary Stringer, which ateatdt origia rated in a love effiair. Eight years ago Mary Stringer was in Set vice as lady's-maid with a family in Devonshire-place. She was then as happy as the days were long, and so she Might have cone tinued, she said, had she rot met, in evil hour, wltt a eentleman who called himself " Mi-ter Smith, of Charing-crms." She met with him one fine summer'; evening, as she was rerrrning from taking tea with an acquenitance, and he sono contrived to wheedle himself into her affections. Other interviews cocceeded; " Mister Smith, of Charing-cross," prevailed on her to leave her place ; and, in process of time, she found herself in a way to gisa birth to a little Master Smith; but "Mr. Smith, of Charing-cross," told her not to alarm herself, for he never would forsake her— no, never. As the time of her accauchentent approached, how ever, he became colder and colder ; his visits because less endless frequent, and at last he absented himself altogether, leaving h e r 'to all the misery and expense of her peculiar situation. In this dilemma she sought for her faithless lover by the address he hid given her—" Mister Smith, of Charing-cross"—but in vain. She became a mothir, surrounded by the most distressing povertyord after suffering privations of every kind during her confinemeet, she placed her child at nurse with a good woman, in the Edge ware-road, who undertook the charge for a consideration of Es. a week. In order to meet this expense she undertook to tittered a family going out to the West Indies, and in that unlita'thy c!i mate her constitution suffered severely. She returned some time ago, and found that her infant died when it was teem months old e and, as she was walking thrnuedi Temple-bar the other day, she, to her great surprise, accidentally saw " Mister Smith, of Charing-cross," for the first time after a laps: of mere than sir years. He was bustling along towards the City—sprecte red powdered, and erect as truth itself. She did not accost him, and he passed without noticing her; but she f illowed him at a dis tance, and saw him enter a shop in the neighbourhood of Saint Paul's, where he remained some time. When he had left, she : went in, and asked the shopkeeper to oblig e her wi th " that gin , Bunsen's address," aed by his answer she found, that her faith less " Mister Smith, of Charing-cross," was no ether than Mr. James Evans, of Northumberland-street, tailor ! She ionne...l - applied to bins for some pecuniary compensation for the extraordinary expenses he bad occasioned her; but instead of doing anythirg of this kia..t for her, he peremptorily ordered. her to depart ; and, were her remonsuating with him upon such unprincipled conduct towards her whom he hid vowed never to.desert, he took her by the shoulders, and, giving le r i two severe blows on the hack, he thrust her out of doors. It was for this assault she now sought redress. The Magistrate observed that if her story was true she had other claims, besides satisfaction for the assault, and he asked the sedate Mr. Evans what he bad to say to it ? Mr. Evans said, lie bad " some reason to believe" that the young woman's story was not true— " What ! do you mean to deny all acqUaintance with her F' asked his Worship. Mr. Evans replied, that he did not mean to deny it altogether; but he thought it possible he was not the father of the child— Here the young woman snatched up the Bible, and ki , sina it fervently, she solemnly declared that she never in her life bast intimacy with any other man. - " Pray Mr. Evans," said the Magistrate, " let me ask you one question. Did you represent yourself to her as Muter Soria, if Charing-Cross?" " Why really, your Worship," replied Mr. Evans, "„I do not ,sack!} recollect that I did." " Will you swear, Sir, that you did not?" demanded the Ma gistrate. 1.1 r.. Evans, after a few moments profound consideration, re plied, that he had no recollection of having celled himself" Miser Smith, of Charing-Cross ;" adding—`e I must speck nothing but the truth, your Worship." " No—but an upright man should speak the whole truth," observed his Worship ; and after a few further interrogato ries, Mr. Evans adr :tted that he certainly could nut have given his wen name and address in such an affair. The Magistrate told him he was bound in honour to make the object of his seduction some recompence far the expense he had put her tn—and if he did this, he would recommend the young woman to forego the complaint of assault. Mr. Evans observed, that he had no sort of objection to satisfy the young woman in this way, if she would only acknowledae that he did not strike her. He could not bear, he said, to rest under such an obloquy, and he requested that that question might be again put to her. The question was put as he desired ; and not only did the yeung woman declare that he gave her two violent blows, but a respectable person, who happened to be passing at the time, folly confirmed her statement; whereupon Mr. Evans raised bs eyes to the ceiling with a " dear me !" sort of look, and withdrew, under the surveillance of the officer who had him in charge, to settle the money matters with his deserted May. BIRTHS. .. On Wednesday evening, October 50, in Berl:el:I-square, Mrs. William Jervis Hiatus, of a son. Oct. 20, at Stirling, the L.ldy of .Srchibald Dow, Esq. of the Bengal Military Establishment, of a son. Oct. 24, at Glasgow, Cie Lady of Major Macdonald, C.D. tat, or Royal Regiment, of a daughter. MARRIED. Oct. 23, at Carnrsie, Dr. James Robertson, to Jean, youngest daughter of John Morrison, Esq. of North Meadow Bank. Oct. 25, at Edinburgh, Walter Skerret Morson, of ttitr island of Montserrat, to Jane, second daughter of Robert J.neu:.• ton, Esq. writer to the signet. Lately, at Fort Nelson (Virginia), l!r. Jesse Berry, of the - United States Army, to Miss Susan nose. A blushing Rose, so sweet and fair, In all it's beauty, caught any view; But straight it vauish'd iuto air, And in its place a Berry grew►! MAILS. MIR. Du a. Dublin ‘laterford _ 0 A Int• t 0: K. 0 0 France I 1:Ini;mr411 1 0 uernseyand Jersey • 0 0 I Ishon 0 0 nantiers 0 0 0 0 Holland 1 0 Leeward Islands 0 0 Got tenburgb 0 0 Alalt4 ,Itamait3 1 t.) HIGH-WATEktat LON.UON bitll).4l: . 51rrtritg . . ss, re t st.t A rei -fter S Aitterptele ZS' ettimitel after 4 1.1)NDON; Printed mid pubbaiwit by I.Evict. his'', ham place, Movie. at. 1