Star. — London, England, 1821-06-02 00:00:00

LAW INTELLIGENCE. COURT OF RING'S BENCH. TH2 KENO V. EDMONDS, M A DOX, CA RTIEIHGHT, WOOLED, AND LEWIS. [The following is a more detailed account than that which want of time obliged us to abridge In the Seas of Yesterday :] The defendant, Madox, being called upon, desired that a friend might be heard in his behalf. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICR--DO you mean a Gen tleman at the Bar?—Defendant—No. • The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE—NO other person can be heard on your part. The defendant, in that case, would himself address their Lordships, although hating, up to the 24th ultimo, confidently relied upon a new trial, he had scarcely had time to arrange a speech'in The defendant then spoke, or read, at considerable length, from a mitten paper. He began by declaring his unwillingness to offend any human being ; but could not approve the existing regulation with re spect to the striking of Special Juries. The Loan CHIEF JUJTICE said that the Court had no power to alter that regulation, and could not pro perly hear it arraigned. 'The defendant proceeded to dwell upon the purity of his intentions, which, he observed, had been per. fectly well known to the Grand Jury who had had the insolence o find a bill against him. . • The COURT recommended the defendant, unless he could urge some other topic, to be silent. The defendant complained of the witnesses who had given evidence at the trial. The Loao Curer JUSTICE said that the witnesses were entitled to protection. The defendant impeached the constitutional qua lity of the House of Commons. The people of Bir mingham, a numerous and important body, thought it hard that they—contributing largely to the main tenance of the State—should be taxed by the Repre sentatives of the two huts at Gatton, the two huts at Castle Rising,The one hut at Old Sarum, and the pigsties at Appleby. It was the Representatives of those places who had sanctioned the slaughter at Manchester, who had suspended the Habeas Corpus Act, and who had caused Baguely, Johnstone, and Diummond, to be dragged through the kingdom in chains. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.—Men lawfully tried and convicted. - The Defendant.—They were never tried at all ; never confronted with their accusers. Mr. Justice BEST.—If they have cause for com plaint, let them make it. The Loan CHIEF Justict tol2. the defendant that he was doing himself mii•chiel. The defendant reverted to the slaughter at Man chester, and spoke of the sale of scats in Parliament.' The LORD CHIEF JUSTICL.—We know nothing of any sanction of a slaughter at Manchester. You will compel us to say that we will not hear you. The oefendant would then address hirnsa to the wisdom and integrity of Parliament. The COURT could not hear either questioned. . The defendant said, that the British Constitution, as now maintained, was that which might be twisted scs anything. Mr. Justice BEsr.—The Constitution is not so spoken of in the indictment; and it is most indecent in you so to speak of it. I think' it ought not to be permitted. I think some measure ought to be taken to prevent persons standing on the floor of the Court for judgment from insulting all the institutiotis of the country. The defendant said, that he was speaking the truth. The LORD Curer JUsTIC Er-4'MS must not be. You must stop for a few minutes, while the Court confers. A pause of some moments followed ; after which The LORD CIIIEF J us vcs addressed the defendant : —lt is the bounden duty•of -the Court to take care that the Constituted Authorities of the country are not libelled in its presence. A man who stands con victed of a crime cannot hope to mitigate punishment by scattering defamation upon all around him. We cannot sit to bear this done; and unless the person on the floor can address himself to those topics which alone are suitable to his situation, we must impose silence upon him, and proceed to judgment. The Court is most unwilling to do anything of that kind:, we are most anxious to hear everything that a de fendant can urge in his favour, and should feel great reluctance in preventing him from addressing Ill: still, however, we must discharge our duty, and will do so. The defendant, in that ca! e, would have to pass -vet nearly - all that he had intended to say. The Loan CHIEF Jusrice.—The Court is ready to hear everything which, without a violation of its duty, 4 t can hear. The defendant, after briefly advel ting to the con dition of his family, concluded :—lle scorned to ask for favour, for he felt that he had committed no crime; he was, however, in the power of their Lord ships ; and,questionless, they would shew him as much mercy as they had shewn to others standing similarly situated before them. Mr. Mills (of Bristol) got up in the jury box, and desired to make a speech on the part of the defend ant Lewis. The LORD Cuter Jusrice.—Who are you ? Mr. Mills.—l have received a letter from the de fendant Lewis, who is in prison, and who has re queited me to address the Court. The LORD CHIEF Jus rim—Lewis is not before us, and we are not about to pass any judgment upon him. Mr. Mills again attempted to speak— The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE.—Be silent, Sir. The Officer of the Court then approached, and Mr. Mills sat down. Major took in the proceedings at:Birmingham; the total absence of any proof of concert with the other de fendants ; his being a silent auditor and spectator of what took place at the Meeting of that day; his merely acknowledging his sense of the vote of thanki conferred upon him for his general political services; circumstances which, proved as they were by his own affidavit, and confirmed by the affidavits of other persons, clearly entitled him to exemption from - being thought an active participator in the supposed con spiracy. But though the venerable Major had, in fact, taken no active share in the events of that occa sion, he wished it to be distinctly understood, that he disclaimed any invidious distinction between his . Case and the cases of the other defendants, being quite ready to bear equally with them the consequences of that verdict which the Jury had pronounced. Look ing, however, to the general nature of the charge, it appeared to him (Mr. Denman), that there were some topics which might be successfully urged on behalf of the defendant, notwithstanding the terms in which the. indictment was framed. The charge against the defendant was, that of "conspiring with other persons .to nominate and elect a Legislatorial Attorney, ti claim a seat in the House of Commons, as Represen tative of the inhabitants of Birmingham in Parliament,. in derogation of the Constitution, and for the purpose of bringing the House of Commons into odium and contempt. Now he was free to own that he was ut terly at a loss to conceive how this could be consi dered as a crime; he had applied his best judgment and consideration to the subject, and the result was, that, in his opinion, this was no crime at all. The appointment of a Legislatorial Attorney, by an As sembly such .as that which had taken place, was a vain and idle proceeding; and the mere fact of such an Appointment could not be construed into an of fence cognizable by the law, unless it was the effect of artifice or fraud, in the abuse of some Constituted Authority. As well might it be said, in the case of the election of a Bishop, that a person giving a conge rrelire without authority was liable to criminal punishment. The same observation would apply to any other appointment. under the like circumstancesr l for it could only be considered as an idle and vain exercise of authority which did not exist, and could not be attended with any injurious -consequences to the,Public. If, indeed, the defendants had forged t King's Writ, or had resorted to any fraudnlent abuse of authority, in derogation of the powers- of other persons, to effect their object, the case would have been far different, and no defence could have been urged. But here no such complexion marked the case. It could not be pretended, in this case, that any mischievous consequences attended their conduct. No riot or breach of the public peace had occurred; it was not even hinted that there was any attempt to violate the law; no Magistrate had found it neces sary to whisper the Riot Act into the ear of his clerk, under pretence that the peace of the commu nity was in danger. A more orderly or peaceable assembly had never taken place on any public occa sion, and it had separated a ithout having commit. ted, or threatened to commit, a single act of violence. Then, as to the intention of the defendants, it ap peared from all the circumstances of the case to have been perfectly bona fide. The Court were not to look to the 'particular conduct of the defendants on the occasion, but they were to refer to the essence of their motives, which had nothing in view but to re medy abuses, which .were not only supposed to exist, but which for ages had been positively asserted to exist, by some of the most enlightened philosophers and statesmen that had ever adorned the country. If the defendants s ere t 3 be considered as entertain ing sentiments of disaffection, in canvassing the con stitution of the House of Commons, and in urging that Reform was necessary in that branch of the Le gislature, then must Lord Chatham, Mr. Pitt, Mr. Burke, Sir G. SaVille, and other enlightened states men, be deemed to have been disaffected traitors to their country. It was no part of his duty on the present occasion to defend the means by which the defendants had sought to remedy the grievances of which they complained ; but if their intentions were honest—if they merely exercised a right which they conceived they possessed, of meeting to discuss pub lic measures, and of expressing their sentiments, surely they were not to be considered criminals for having done no more than the Constitution of the country allowed the subjects of England? The greatest men that ever lived had come forward in' like manner to express the like sentiments, and the right of meeting publicly for such a purpose had never yet been questioned. It was in this spirit, and with this object in view, that these defendants had met on the occasion in question. Were they then under such circumstances to be brought to the Bar of. Justice? Looking to the history of Major Cart wrighCs life, it was Utterly impossible to impute to him anything like disaffection. He bad been a pub lic man for fifty years : he had laboured early and late in the service of his country—his yoOth had been spent in the Navy of England, fi ghting the bat tles of his country, and in his matures years, he had served his Majesty as an Officer in the Militia. In his later life, his public conduct, his writings, nu merous as they were, challenged the most scru pulous examination, and nothing was to be found in either but patriotism, virtue, and integrity.— —Labouring to promote the public welfare he had Spent a long life, beloved and esteemed by all parties. Could it, then, be suggested, that at the age of 84, he ought to be stigmatised as a traitor to his country, as a person so disaffected as to call for the visitation of the Attorney-General? If such Meetings as these were to be considered as illegal, then every Meeting that had taken place to arouse public opinion in the cause of public virtue must be deemed illegal. Pub- The COURT then called upon Major Cartwright. lic opinion could-only be preserved by such means, Mr. DENMAN immediately rose, and said that since and by that engine alone was the national character this case had been before the Court the other day, he preserved. The infamous and bloody traffic in slaves, had been instructed by Major Cartwright to address so disgraceful to the British nation, was.rooted out such topics to the Court as presented themselves to only by public opinion, repeatedly and publicly ex his Own mind, which might be available to the ye-; pressed ; and with as much propriety might Public nerable defendant, in this last stage of the proceed-1 Meetings tor that purpose be considered as conspi ings. Since the trial, his attention had not been par- i racies against the West India merchants, as this be titularly called-to the circumstances of the tase ; and called a conspiracy to bring the Constitution into' although ho had not been a very attentive observer : hatred and contempt. By public opinion alone was of what had subsequently passcd, yet bearing in mind public virtue preserved ; and under the influence of what had been teported by the Learned Judge, and that check were our institutions kept in a state of the-facts mentioned in the affidavit of the venerable healthful vigour. It was a fatal delusion to imagine defendant, it appeared to him that there were some that such Meetings could do any harm. Such an legitimate topics of mitigation, which could not be opinion begot a reverence for folly and absurdity, urged without considerable effect on his behalf. H e and taught es , " the best disposed persons to mistake then adverted to the very small share which the worthy t the corrupt excrescences of the Constitutiod for the Constitution itself. The moral conviction of the ex-. istence of such abuses was not to be disputed, and it was only by public opinion that they could be re dressed. It was quite extraordinary how even such abuses excited the admiration and respect of those who shuddered at Reform. He remembered the pre sent Poet Laureat, in a strain of admiration of the Constitution of our forefathers, saying, that in the last stage of its decay, like a venerable oak, it still looked verdant at a distance—" but it was the dark verdure - of the ivy which cankered its heart." The Learned Counsel, in a 'powerful strain of eloquence, then proceeded to advert to the public and private virtues of the worthy Major, whose life had been de voted in promoting the arts of his country, in endea vouring to preserve the purity of our national insti tutions, and in the pursuit of those objects which dig nified and ennobled the character of man. Consi dering, then, the conduct of such a man, consider ing the motives by which he had been actuated—his 1 1 venerable age, his amiable and unoffending deport ment through life, he was quite convinced that the Court, in discharging its painful duties (for painful they must be in such a case), would proceed to wards him with that tenderness and consideration to which, on every account,. he was so much entitled.— In conclusion, he adverted to the worthy Major's desire, that whatever punishment the Court might be disposed to inflict, imprisonment rather than fine should be imposed , considering that if the latter course should resorted to, it would have the effect of disinheriting a beloved niece, the daughter of an elder brother, whom he had adopted, and of depriv ing an adored wife and aged sisters of that means to which they looked for support in the advanced autumn of life. However, since this case was last before the Court, he (Mr. Denman) had received a letter from those relatives, in which they deptecated the idea of allowing any consideration of their situ ation to weigh with-the Court, when the health and liberty of their venerated friend were at stake—and, agonized with the sense of those sufferings which awaited him, they implored the Court to avert that punishment which the worthy Major himself was disposed to hail with the genuine spirit of martyrdom in a cause to which his life had been devoted. Such were the feelings of those beloved relations. The worthy Major, though a nominal defendant in this case, would be the greatest sufferer, but lie came with manly fortitude to meet all that could he in flitted on him, consoling himself that, under every dispensation, there was a Public who would respect him, and an impartial posterity who would do justice' to his name and actions.—The Learned Counsel sat down amidst a burst of uncontroulable applause from the auditory. Mr. Hat, on the same side, expressed hit unwil lingness to weaken the impression which the elo (peace of his Learned Friend must have made on the Court. Mr. Wootta then addressed their Lordships. He said, after the full discussion which the subject had received, there was little necessity for him to trouble them with any observations. He asserted in the most solemn manner his belief of the legality of the Meeting, and the objects for which it was called, though he took no active part in the calling of it, or proposed any Resolution when there. True he had attended it and moved Thanks to the Chairman, and as he conceived every subject of the King had a right to be in any part of the realm, their Lordships would not, he was sure, impute it to him as a crime that he happened to be at Birmingham on the day of the Meeting. The Lord Chief Baron had allowed there was no statute against this Meeting, and if the com mon law were, as it was said to be, " the perfection of reason," it certainly was not contrary to that, as it was no principle of common sense that the.people of Birmingham should not be represented in Parlia ment. He would remind the Court that the Meeting took place before the passing of the six Acts, by which such Meetings might be tendered illegal. He admitted that if any charge of conspiracy could be proved, being present, he was to all intents and pur poses a party ; but he had never had the slightest concern with any of the parties. He pressed upon their L. - , , rdships the injury which the defendants had sustained by the sort of prejudication their case had undergone. A Proclamation from the, highest an dimity had issued, charging it as a crime of the highest degree ; and one of the Learned Judges from the Bench had charged it as a crime little less than treascn. Could the defendants (looking at the minds of men and the manner in which they were im pressed)—could the defendants, under such circum stances, come fairly before a Jury ? To say nothing of the manner in which that particular Jury had been selected. Upon all points of that description, however (the defendant continued), he was concluded by the by-gone decision of the Court ; and he would only say a few words more as to the nature and tx• tent of punishment. It was possible that a Govern ment might be so situated as to be compelled to resort to a vigour, as it was called, beyond the laws. Such - vigour was at least a hardship upon the indi vidual who chanced to be the victim of it. •For him self, in the way of mitigation, he had no plea tp offer ; but, one boon he would request : he begged that his punishment might come in the way of im prisonment, •as fine would, in effect, be only im-, prisonment lengthened; he had, he believed, con-' trived to balance his accounts with the world ; but' that which remained to him would be little better than a cipher. He concluded a judicious and tem perate appeal by entreating their Lordships to pardon any excess of feeling which might have been dis played by the defendants, and to take into considers don the sufferings and inconveniences they had al ready experienced for conduct which they had never considered as a'crime. The SOLICITOR-GENERAL then addressed the Court, nor, he said, in aggravation of punishment, as they apprehended, but, from what was said, he felt it ne cessary to set right the circumstances of this case, which he hoped would be the last of the kind that would come before their Lordships. He was not bound to offer anything in aggravation, and, as Counsel for the prosecution, he would be exceeding his duty -if he did ; but he thought it right to answer some arguments which were advanced on the part of the defendants. His Learned Friend had said, the subsequent conduct of the defendants should not linfluence their Lordship? judgment. Against that doctrine he (the Solicitor-General) begged to protest. If they expressed contrition for their conduct, that would sis:c them a fair claim to their Lordships' con sideration; but their conduct seerned to him deserfir. of a greater punishment than Might Otherwise tended. Not content to justify their illegal acts,th;.. besides libelled the witnesses, juries, and all the si ete - ' d institutions of their country. - If good conducnth e , ' would give a claim to a milder punishmen t , the cs,2 fillet of the defendants called for an aggsevate`d punishment. The Learned Gentleman then we st over the circumstances of the Meeting, of the ilk. gality of which they must have been aware, c a r s im h ei. could slew from their speeches, extract s o f w hi ch he read and commented on at some length. After a short consultation will his Learned Broth ers, L Mr. Justice BATEY declared the judgme nt o f thi Court at considerable length, discriminati ng , w ie l his usual nccuracy, the different degrees o f nality which by the evidence appeared to attach each of the defendants. He went at considerable length over the evidence given at the trial, and over the speeches as published subsequently to the M eet . ing by the defendants, Edmonds and Woolen Fire hundred seats in the House of Commons were d e , scribed as being sold to the best bidder. Was that assertion, or was it not, calculated to diminish th e respect which persons would otherwise feel for that House? There might be s..me . instances in which, contrary to the spirit of the Constitution, con up t i en I was employed in returning Members to the Ilouie tf Commons; that might be true ; hut here the :nehitation extended to .500 seats net of 658. He (the heeled Judge) put it to the hearts of the defendants them. selves, whether such an assertion eas not ea culated to bring the House of Commons into contempt. A s to the principle of Uilivei Sill S. ffrage, it Na, de pe. culiar blessing of the Blitish Constitution that every ,man was virtually represented in Parliament. Alan hers were chosen by particular places ; but the mo. ment they were chosen they became bound to act, not merely for the benefit of their constituents, but for the good of the Public at large. It every man had an inherent right, however, a natural right, indc. pendent of the law, to vole for Members of Parlia ment, why were worsen to be excluded iron] the same free right ? The Learned Judge then adverted to th e motion for a new trial, and commented upon the facts and argument: which had been adduced in support of that application. His Lordship proceeded :—The Court had attended to the which had been laid before then). It tea • the most unpleasant panof its duty to inflict punishment upon individuals, parti. cularly where that punishment affected their families. His Lordship wished that 1-efore persons subje c ted themselves to danger, they would think on the skin. Lion of those who were dependent upon them, lle Court had not forgotten the family of the defendant Edmonds ; and they wished that the coi,duct , f the defendant Madox had been such as to strengthen the claim which his family also gave him upon their merciful consideration. The affidavit of Major Cart wright exhibited the feelings of an extremely . good heart, strong pi inciples 'of relieion, and great attach ment for the country to which he belonged. Its (the Learned Judge) lamented to see that tr i er) ()Le sub ject, and I.erhaps upon only one, them was to a cer tain degree, in the mind of that Gentleman, a delu sion, an unfortunate delusion, as to the riehtsoladult men to vote for their own Representatives. The Ma jor's preference of imprisonment to fine was a prefer ence which deserved to weigh, and would weigh, with every well-constituted mind; but the Court was bound to look at the Major's age, and to judge more prudently for him than he had done for himself,. The Court, taking all the circumstances of the case into its consideration, did order and adjudge—that the defendant Edmonds should be imprisoned for Nine Months; the defendant Mador, for Eighteen; and the defendant Wooler, for Efteeo Months, in the Jail of Warwick: to find sureties fur their good be haviour duriu five years, themselves in 1.400 each, and taco securities in se2oo each : the sentence of the Court upon Major Cartwright was—that he should pay a fine of £lOO to the King, and be imprisoned until that fine was paid. Major Cattrvratctrr's sentence produced a Mr general sensation of joy. The venerable Gentleman was cordially congratulated by his co-defendants upon the result of his case. He kindly took lease of them; and, after shaking hands with Mr. DENMAN ) paid down his fine, and left the Court. A melancholy instance of the uncertainty of human life oc curred at Beer Ferris on Wednesday last. As Mr. STOMA HD, the artist, and son of ? the celebrated Historical Painter of t , at name, was engaged in sketching a figure in one of the windows of the church, he fell from a ladder and was killed on the spot. _ _ DTRD. The 15th ult. at a very advanced age, 12 Michael's-place, Brompton, Mrs. Storacc. This Lady was the sister of the cele brated Dr. Trusler—mother of the late Stephen Storace, whose merit will always keep his name high in musical estimation, and mother also of Signora Storace, who as a singer and an actress acquired considerable reputation, land eminently contributed to the amusement of the Public in several countries. Mrs. Storace, who has just paid the debt of nature, was a woman of great knowledge of life, and one of those characters of plain, open, blunt sincerity, of which the refinements of modern artifice awl hypocrisy have left but few examples. She was taken ill on Thursday evening, ant expired on the Sunday following in the arms of her friend, Mrs. Cooke, apparently without pain. On the 17th ult. at Aston, aged 66, Mr. James Fayel, a native of Pifeshire. He came to England in early life, with somewhat lest of. education than the Scotch peasantry have generally tie . good fortune to get. Fur nearly the last forty years he was as intelligent, active, and confidential servant in the Aston first as gardener, then as house steward, and lastly as bailiff and general manager. About the, middle of life he took to read and collect books very eagerly, and availed himself of access to the valuable library of both his worthy masters, and others in the neighbourhood, who delighted to supply him with the messed that information he so well knew how to appreciate and apply. Latterly, however, he took to drinking, and read but little, ex cept Newspapers, Magazines, and Reviews, which he pored g"! with diligent avidity to the list, as (next to ' his copious libaUncal they constituted the most intense object of his existence. Till within a few months his activity was surprising for any mot , the more so in him, whose personal weight must have exceede d 25 stone. His honest face was amply cropped with the fruits di his continual irrigation ; and his nose was literally divided Ist* four parts, each of which, with the aid of Talicotius, would have formed one of no diminutive size for any full grown subject. fie had a large share of strong shrewd wit, which be imparted slits to all ranks, in a free and powerful manner, aided by a dteP' tonadoo, and the broad Doric of his dialect. Though often sar castic, he never gave offence, as all Liked his humours nd oddities for all well knew his sound and incessant benevolence. MraT, very many in his neighbourhood, will now in their hearts ezdaills as did Hostess QuicAlp to Sir Jahn Falstaff—" Well, fare thee weal I have known thee these twenty-nine years, conic peasi9d that; but an honester, and truer-hearted—we ll , are thee well - --- - HIG H.WATEIt at LON DON 11111 DOE TO-Molt Itt)W. Idtzning - - 17 mown atter • Afternoon . . 36 ------ 4 --------- . LW:IP ; Printid sad publialed by UM. Ittcr, Trmp'e•B.tr. CUSTOM ity Order of the Hots. thi Vu THURSDAY, the 7th, o'Cloek in the After: Rooms, Mincing-lane ruHE FOL FOR /L Sugar, Pimento, Gin' Vine, Rum, Brandy, ( Samples.of the Good ting's Cellars Castor the West Ind ia and La day, the sth, and Weds hours of besiness. Cat house, Custom-I louse, A Deposit of Twent Sale, and the-rensainde Office, Custorn-liouse Saturday, the iusta and the Goods for Ilse turdgy, the 30th instals the 30th September st forfeited, and the Goos TOMKIN MTOMKIY L Public, that h TWENTY-I The Trustees, appoint London Gazette their displayed in the finiehit Prizes. • _ Tickets, st 3. 3s. eaci Tland-strect, where S gratis, and at all the L The Purchaser of a to gain a Prize. TIIX . KING'S SECT This day was publishec the 24th A SECOND LI Published by Willis nese the Duke of Yini still be had, the Foist which (being the 24th On the lit of THE NEW M SKRIFsS), print Cu! taining : I. Digested Accoun the Writings of queve On the Choice of a Pr ing.—Vi I. Jonathan Ilarp, a Tale from the and Associations.—X. —X I. 'lid- Pages.—: of Australasian Poetry X V. The Universe, a Narrative of the Cap the Debasement of the of Madame de Surd% —XX. Sonnets,. E.* Myron and the Literar rota's Marino Paliero. Observations on the pr New Publications, wit terary and Scientific— Copy-right—Third Tomb—Report reap Fund, &c.—XX V I. Jane on Sir J. Banl New Inventions, Dis bleteorological, Agi Events..—ltucresting Times, and Deaths hempton, Sir J. Coll Bateman, 111 r. Fox, Printed for Henry Bradfute, Edinburgh by all B ooksellers, N Just publishw HOLLAND.- rr 'This imp , •orlglnal Letters from Various commend Continental publicati Review in high estin mending It to the fliGtory, as an imp° .much light on a mos The Monthly Rev form a valuable addi , they will be perused character of the autt the sufferings of his London : Printed and Lepard, Finsbt " Of whom A SYSTIM of F 'Other ERLICM Pang Council of State, en peror Napoleon. E trait, price 8• g*- This rig t mord Napoleon, at St. Cl and the original MS. . This day we OONVERSA' N 6.1 in a Series of 1 a Mocker and her Grammar are intro to excite the attend/ 'fey to their minds principles of law ill m This Volt we recommend it port, as being adm snind_Correct ideas —Vide Imperial l witiallY favourable Literary Chronicle London :* Prlno and Lepard, Fula of Whom 1 _ SOlabia lipsUlm by winch any Mil read the English I of a few Months. price 41. dd. Als, Schools and Chasit The . Mental C 4 General Rules for testing _Problems forming an Elam is added., a Guide This Work a a pair of Globes; tl so arranged as to terns. being avoid stellations will als be Moulted by g Nu Ili 6'