Star. — London, England, 1817-01-23 00:00:00

LAO I NAELLIG CE. _ COURT OF CHANCERY, JANUARY 22. DA 11 AND BRADFORD v. UPHILL. • Sir 3itmtr7.l.. ItoNtu.v in this C 35,1 moved his Lord iltip.to dissolve an Jilin . ction, formerly granted for the purpose of restrain:og the defendant from cutting down some trews, and plonghing itone ancient pas ture land . ; on an•estate in which she was tenant tot lirgL He — argued, • it . was impossible the Injunction h a i his Lordship been CAW have bren obtained, jiTt . i . apcisst.sll46l a complete statement-of facts.— She was •J tens*. foilife ;* but, she was also unim peathable of waste, although the contrary had been, stated. Slur had here riade,so by an agreement with ilaihttlf; agree.nent was afterwards rati dijr, ,*.and oh' Seticli sr, -cud till the Injunction was MICSH o '. ll the sarri side. Mr. Lewd, in support of . the. Injunction, said, he altiays understood before an Injunction was dissolv ed, a case must be made put to satisfy his Lordship of the impropriety of any longer retaining it. In this, howeVer, he contended no such case had been rude out. He admitted she was a tenant -without impeachment of waste, bin he maintained she had become so at the sxpense of her family ; for by mak ing this a condition in ilie . agteement she made with them, she had benefited . hersch at their cost. Besides she had • avowed her intention to cut down the re maining trees, and plough up the meadow land, the moment the. Court should withdraw the Injunction, and as her doing so would be an irreparable injury to the property, he contended it was absolutely DC cew:ry that the Injunction be continued. Mr. Rae followed. Sir SAAWIL R.OI6IILLY, in reply, said, as the parties were so nearly allied to each other (one of the plain tiffs being the daughter of the defendant), it was necessary the Court should' be in the fullest possession of every tac• . A charge had been made against the p;aintiffs for sappressing material facts, and he had nnt thought proper to meet that charge, by making any.affidav , t to refute it. She had every right to act as she had done, and he saw no reason whatever to ailedge that the damage to he done to the estate by ht.r ploughing the meadow land, and cutting down the rer4aining wood, was irrvarable.. The LORD CHANCBLLOR said, that formerly in the Court, Injuitetions had been refused where the party boldly insisted on their right to proceed as they had done. remembered distinctly the manner in which tn.. edse had come before him, and the cir committees which had induced hint to grant the In junction. lie should take home ete answer to-night, and read it over, and on coming into the Court to morrow morning, h- should give his opinion. Mr. Leave.-1 understand, my Lord, we may amend our Bill. LORD CHANCRUqlt.—Certainly, Mr. Leach, for you cannot sustain an Injunction on one ground, while you wish to rest it on another. His Lordship informed the Counsel that he had seed over the papers in the case of Ellworthy w. Her ring and others, and would give judgment to-morrow morning. • COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JANUARY 115., HEIDEN O. BLOCK. This was art information in the.name of a gui informr against the defendant, upon the Stat. 5 Ann, for onlasetully keeping a net for the putpose of de groihig game. It was tried •at the. last Summer Assiies for Herefordshire, and a verdict was found . for the plaintiff upon the second count for one pe nalty. fn the last Term Mr. CAMPBELL obtained a rule NW for arresting the judgment,..on the ground that be information did net negative the defendant's qualification, as by law it ought to do. ' Mi4eavis and Mr. PULLEN not :hewed Cattle against the rule, and . contended that the word utslatv- My being introduced into the information, it dis pensed with the necessity of otherwise negativing the defendant's qualification, but • The Court were clearly of opinion, that as there were other ways in wh ch the defendant _might be unlawfully possessed of the net in question, and al the information itself pointed at an offence against the Game Laws, it was absolutely necessary distinctly - and specifically to negative the qualification.. Rule absolute for arresting the judgment. SECONDARIES' OFFICE, JANUARX 22. WARREN e. SCOTT. An inquest was yesterday held in the Sheriffs' Court for the purpose of assessing the damages in an action brought by thesplaintiff to recover compress'. tion . for a false and malicious libel published by the .defendant in a Periodical Work, in which action the defendant had suffered judgment to go by default. Mr. SCAILETT, in addressing the Jury on behalf of the plaintiff, stated, that he was Lieutenant-Ca fond of the 27th Regiment, of which Lord Moira is Colonel. He bad found it his duty in the year 1815 to institute a prosecution against Captain Tucter,, one of his subordinate officers, whO was ac cordingly tried by a Court-martial, on a charge of improperly appropriating to .himself a horse at the bas le of Waterlov. Of this charge he had. been partally convicted ; but on consideration of his for. tiler services, and his having been wounded in the battle, had been permitted . to remain on half•psy. AU this took place in 1815; and in May, 1816, the defendant bad published a ong article, accusing the plaintiff, Colonel Warren, of rancorous and personal motives in the prosecution, of having stated false haods in hi. evidence, and combined with others to defeat we orders of hi. Royal Highness the Coat mander•iii•Chief. lie had been thus arraigned be. fore the public of malice, perjury, And mutiny, in his character of prosecutor.. Mr. Scarlet' assured the Jury, that it had been the sincere wish of the plaintiff, that the defendant should put a justifica tion on . the recoid, and that the falsehood of the charges might bp proved by an investigation of them. He hatlstlected this as the molt lenient and candid mode•of proceeding for that purpose; for be might have ptoceeded in the . Court of ,King's Bench by in formation or by indictment; tLe consequence of which mint have been to deprive the delendant .of Ls liberty. .The defendant had, however,*declinen pleading; and nothing, therefore, r e mai ne d t o t h e r!. bat to..declaris *bat reparation was doe to an . reficer'9l scant, ti Ito kid been so groislt slandered 1 2.2 MOW; rAti r Ato the,oprrtunity was offered ltun 01 pubbing Vs truth. of his assertions shit his ' • . • insinuations, mom= it-mosLailvisable to shrink from the contest. It'veas *A* Consolation to the nnwdestionably, to god so maarhOnontable • men involved with himself id this indiscriminate Inmny ; for such waiehe opinion enteriariNed * OV iTos Bride's army by this defendknt, whn bbasted having, devoted himself to its service, that in one earl of the libel,refeyring. to the charge aptinst Capl: nicker, he II t I observed, that if it was an offence, one half' of the British army at Waterloo might have biten riund guilty of it. His client WAS actuated by no merce nary motives, his fortune, his character, and lfis rank, placed . him above such a suspicion ; but .he . had ' a right to call for such damages as would appear to the world indicative of the July's conviction of the falsehood and baseness of the calumny. • There was a delicacy in a soldier's feelings, a delicacy in a sol dier's honour, which, it was the duty of the Jury not to overlook. Reputation was his fortune, charac,ter his only security. With two or three esceptioni,..in which wealth had been acquired as well aufami, how few officers, after a long period of faithful service, were Ale to say, that they had gained any thing be yond empty glory! Few of them even contemplated any other reward, or had any wish so near their hearts, as that the character acquired in defending their country's rights and safe:y by their personal skill and valour, should descend in all its purity to their posterity. Mr. Scoir, the defendant, lamented his own flefi ciencies in following a Gentleman of the Learned Counsel's forensic abilities. Ile began by saying, that had it suited the convenience of the Learned Counsel to have delayed this inquest, he might have had the advantage of the evidence of the Duke of Wellington and Sir Lowry' Cole. The UNDER SHeath informed the defendant. that he had admitted the e ublicatioa in question tu be a false and malicious libel. by suffering judgment to go by default. No evidence wile now admissible, the object of which was to justify that libel. Mr. SCOTT thought the plaintiff had very lit tle of the merit ascribed to him by-his. Cqnnsel as being actuated, by no mercenary feelings, wheo.he had laid his damages at afl,ooo. He should prove, if it was permitted to him, that Colonel Warren could have suffered very little or no damage from this publication, because be had no character ,to maintain. The defendant here entered into some strictures on the conduct and reputation of the plain , tiff, when Mr. Scarlett submitted that this was to tally irregular, and was, in fact, adding one libel to another. The UNDER &HERM said he had abstained from before checking the defendant, which perhaps'it• was hie duty to bare done, merely from that indulgence which was generally sbewn to persons wild pleaded their own cause. Mr. Scot.r observed, that he could prove that the conduct of Colonel Warren had incurred the' ani madversion of the King himself, and was proceeding to state the substance of it. Mr. Sea:aLarr said, that if the document in ques tion could not be read in evidence, still less could the dtiendant's interpretation of it be received. One of the Jurymen submitted to the defendant, whether he was acting judiciously with a view to his own case, in thus attacking the character of the plaintiff, when the plaintiff had no opportunity of answering him. Mr. SCOTT then declined to proceed fisher, arbe was not allowed, in mitigation of damages, to stew that the plainiiff had sustained = injury that could entitle him to corhpensation. ' 'The ...Tory, after a few minutes' consideration, found ~ a verdict for the plaintiff in damages, atsoo: • • 01.D.Ba1taltY MISSIONS. • .Iresterday . Joares Frames was indicted fcr robbing James Judd, on the King's highway, of 1,00 shillings, the_ property of his Majesty. . Mr. GURNSY opened the awe for die-proseentioe. James Judd was a twopenny pest letter-carrier.. Between five and siz o'clock on the evening of the sth ol.November, be was in Bell-lane, Whitechapel, having received money for the postage of letters to the amount of £lO and upwards, consisting of eight Al notes, and the rest in silver. He was stopped by three men, one of when:, the shortest of them, laid hold of his right arm, and held it while the prisoner Eat the bar robbed him of the'property in question : the third man WAS looking on. As soon as they got the money they all ran as ay. Witness immediately went to the Police-Office, and described the men, but Dever saw the prisoner again until the 28th of November at Lambeth-street Police-Office. The* were several in custody at the Office, but *meek readily pointed out thcprisoser from among them o rts being one of the three who robbed him. - 6 Samuel. Millet. mai' a .Police-Olfiter. bektiginic ti Lambeth -street, Whitechapel. In consequence of as advertisement detailing the prisoner, witness wont, in search of him, and found Freeman walking to the , street is Whitechapel, bemoan three and four o'clock in the aftereoon, and took him to the Office. Judd was brought to the Office, and as soon as he saw Freeman turned upon his heel and walked awey. ' The defence of the prisoner, given at the Office, in Lambeth -street, was then read; it was as follows: I have aothincto ley. I was at home the whole of the day on which I was charged with the rqb bery. I did not go out from three until eight o'clock in the evening." The prisoner repeated the defence he bad malt at the Office, %ad called Hannah CUT, who deposed, that she knew the pri soner. On the day in question she pilled on Mr. Evitt, wherq the prisoner lodged, in Dog-row, White; chapel, at three o'clock, and remained there until eight o'clock. The prisoner was at home all this time, and witness left him there when the went away. C.roswczainised.—She was emarried woman, and her husband was in the gun-line. She lived in Tewks bury.court, Whitechapel. As soon as the prisoner was apprehended she went to see him; but he did not then know for what lie had been taken up. On the day in question, Freeman was employed in put. tang nails in hi shoes, drinking tea, and talking.— She did not know what business the Prisoner wa. in. She very seldom drank tea with Mr. Evict, but hop• pened to be there on the day Specified. Mr. Evitt was reading when witness went in. • . • : ,Diona Evitt lived at Nq. 8, Dog-row, and, hod knows the prisoner for about eight asootbs. "id -lodged with her, and was accustomed at times te be .employed in making ropes. ,Shareecilksted,,thaten the 4111 of Noveinher Freemen came , house, hes.-- hat" "l Mue4tru aud cumt.o'clurr e baying tone on* at about lialkst sevett in th 'mornin. - The pyi . sier* co mtto tie Udine with . 'some nails g in phis hatd, p and wa d i teMPloyed in puttirfrate nails in his shoes-until about. a quarter past four, when witness, Mes. Care, and Freemen, had tea together. Mrs. Carr came in iaboot three o'clock, when witness was cleaning the 1 ,house; she often came to witness's house in the even ing. The prisoner did nothing particular after tea, i but sat, and talked. Cross•examined.—Witness employed herself in collecting kitchen stuff- from different families. She could not name any person for whom 'the prisoner worked. A woman came us witness's house, of b the name of. Clayton, with Mrs.:Carr. Mrs:Clayton drank tea with her, 'and staid. as long As, Mrs". Carr, with whom she went away. Witniss never beard any thing, on ,the du in _question. Mr. Justice r t tilK summed up the ev idence to the. Jury.' and took. occasion to observe upon the eximi nations before Magistrates. Their province was to examine witnesses before the commitment cr dis-, charge of the prisoner, for their own security.; not to enter into the niceties of the case, to hear evidence on both sides. or decide upon the guilt or innocence of the prisoner, for that alone was the ackowledged province of a Jury. The examination before a Ma gistrate should be wow* merely ; for to be other wise, he reputed, would be usurping that power Which was expressly vested in other. and more: com petent hands. The Jury returned a verdict of Guilty. Parich Dowms and 77sowar Walton, who were tried and acquitted last Friday of the murder of Edward Stanton in St. Giles's, were put to the bar, charged with ro bbing the said Edward Stanton of a Bank dollar, value 5s- 6d. and 10s. 6d. in shillings and *spencer., his property. Jane Jealous, a woman of the town, proved, that on the 28th of December she was at Bastall's coffee shop in St. Giles's : witness saw Stanton and the pri soners in that house : Downes and Waltou, and others, first took. Stanton into a corner of the room, and presently the deceased broke the chair andlell. On the ground : Dowses had his hand on his throat,- and Walton. took some money out of his pocket.— (Vl!itness then detailed what had already been. stated. on the former trial, and which is now unnecessary 'to be repeated). Wallets had no money in thabeginning. of the evening ; but subsequently be seemed vety flush, and offered a Bank dollar to a'friend of his, ; Called George the Groom. When Stanton came, into the ceffei:-shop, he had a qeartetn-loaf in hiy band, together with some paper and silver. 'Cross-examined by Downes.—She was afraid co mention the fact of the robbery to the coffee-shops 'man, because Mary Lees was about to do-it, and one of the young ruffians, named Thomas Jones, took out a knife and threatened to sthb her if thesauri any thing about it. Mary Lees repeated her former statement ip cos-: roboration of the 'former witness's evidence. and added, that while the disturbance was gqing on .the coffeeahop man came in, and ordered the men not e saying to a man called Pecirge, thogroom, 1 1 As for you, Williams, I know:Y . o9,loe a notedthief, and you only come here ie. kick pp.* row., !keyston e . When he came into the coffee-shop, hadsaperrawd ' silver ; and said, hitting his +Dykes:Smithy haide• g‘ Ifs I lose this, miny perscitis will itterve.'" . •..• Eliu Willem s, peeßnt 41901allaiagutIstielUIV the attack upon. Stantoo in the same . whiter- pe did out theformer trial. She saw yaw ! sneer glit tering thrtiugh the deceued'i. ilend before the Inter , adios ; be put it into hislefatand,bceekhes pock* . . and buttoned it up. John Smith, beadle of the ppriah of St, Giles, re % membered that on the night af.ibe 28th of Deem bee, Stanton was brought intn*the tivatclt-house. deceased had then no money.inhis pocket but 45.• Francis Basun kept the cuffee-shop in. question. He saw the deceased there on the night of the 28th of December, but could pot say at what hour he came in. He 'never had seen Stanton "before- The deceased had a cup of coffee, 'far which he paid 2d. in half-pence. Witness saw no money in Stanton's posse lion, but these half-pence. The deceased was not drink but fresh (rather tipsey.) He heard a noise subsequently like the breaking of a chair, which brought him a second time into the. room. There were seven or.eight men and, a woman about Stan-. *ton, who was then ne a r the fire. Jane Jealous was there, and. was in such a . situation that• she might have seed all that passed. Toe question from the COurt, witness said, that it was after the , breaking of the chair that-the deceased .pitid•the24. for his coffee. Being again qrrestioned by this Court, he replied, Abet be could net speak positively that it wasStantone who paid for the coffee. Mary Lees did not come to him and offer to tell him something, whichah was deterred from doing by Thomas Jones, who threatened her with a kaite. • In their defence the prisoners denied any know.. ledge' of the transaction of which they were chargeth- The Jury acquitted both the prisoners. Mr. Justice Pane addressed the young men, -mad recommended them in the strongest terms to teary to another and an honest course. of life. The Jury bad returned a verdict of. nut' guilty, because, although tlierewas.strong,presumptive evidence, yet that there was not quite sufficieut strength in thele shire' testimoay to bring thejact home, If, however; they continued in .the same wicked ways, the nest time the . evidence • Might be stronger, and they would be punished i.s .they deserved, .At present they must' be sliscilarged. • . An appliCaiiun was made to 'detain Walton on a charge of burglary, but Mr. Janice Fang would:give no order for iliac purpose. • ••• • - • • • - • J. Irrise.was also capitally. Convicted for assaulting T. Stubbs en the highway,...aed staling. from his person a sitter watch.. . , Six wifficiiiiicied Of .felony, vin... Robere SHIA 4 for stealing niece sbirts.and. other artielea.• the pro perty of C. Jackson- 7 40. ottorray,, for stealing tjaeket, a pair of trpersers e dtc: ti;kpapperty r orl. •Watslell— Cheeks Primo:4.pr stealing 8111$14 ankles ., of 4) 4 Ploperty...aLi t Smith /and G. Maros, for stealing three pair of sines, the I soPertY or E. Sinclair—and W. Bodrr, foLsteahog: three pair. of sheds, the property JphpstOne. . - • I• • .6 • V., • • •;. Friday ? . )retei litipbwk:ieltier;. visa filled 4 the -81Y-slbp, at Mr: F-i4latOn'steaLwotks, Jeatalield, masi Glasgow. ' S 0 1 / 2 714Q.ES IN. I 1 LAND. Satuteay ra'an!ght, at the honie of the Rn. • Mr. parish of Castleraban, am the county of Cavan, was . persons, who tied the serval property worth carrying .liberately boiled the tea keti ing in drinking tea and put .Mr. SettriANT. On Mr. noise, and on asking who dimly fired at tan, whi. but his pistol missed fire. .the robbers were so injudi slugs which hit him in the two coats, waistcoat, and injury. On . Mr. S. Min. • was killed, aid immt•diatel; dwelling- hone, an d canied linen, avid BSO in money. The same party then procee. to the deer park of 1 6 .49 , 11 - quietly through tli".hati Morrow, Permant .11 Serj, .duff corps of yeomanry, w ,he was apprized of their bei , seized a.firelock, which v:r down two of the party, ac bled another, when he recei his left arm near the wrist Wit broken above the el! lock r he also received a quite disabled bins. Both so dreadfully beaten as to villains proceeded to plu: ped after having robbed gold, besides much Other • The Freeman's Journal assert. lege. Board, Dublin, have - 'ion of expunging Loctu'i vernment' from the Coill An information 'WAS lay Staines. and another informer Gentlemen of Amesbury, I wine without a retail spirit .at Salisbury decided against grciiincr that' spirits of wir lured them, if they laid " Christians, never again to wicked a transaction.'! The ploughman of, Mr. Hearne, in Kent, last, wee his master's fields, a gui, CHARLES in high preset\ denomination was first coined called a Grimes, from beinr from the part of the AI that name. MAIL han: 1, at Syransea, Louisa, daught.r of the Idle Ma) Jim 14, at'Caillsl4.• Henry Han, dam dogfrer of slit lata Wsn.dities, Regiment of Foot. 7 On the 6th instant. at Gretna Little Orton, near Carlisle, to ' gallant spark is neiiii nventy goadveof Hibertdarabout* areente fiche happy snoment; than Olen es the wgdding day 1 " nothing loth, a esaysysice which he p flay let Of tartly:7 ler Gretna; if tfit. ainelpirfattheirthe 'dada .6,410 annuli to Orton in high by every atan, woman and chil d Alb, gins and plithlint the parfsh the anintris fair were kept awalse of the Ste-arms, and the bursas • . bk. At Acton; Mlddlittak,' la tie Samuel Wen t Tursiday tie notirot, at Bath, • In Dular-atteet, Whitebaven, brig Eliza; aged 413. Jan. 2, Miss Dalrymple, daughter rymple, Minister of satyr. ' Dec. 8, Elizabeth Burns, wife' Polkemmet, and daraghter of ti the subject of some of his most Sunday se'ineight, the Rev. Scholar of Worcester College, Lloyd Williams. Vicar of Whit Sunday selanight. at White!). • Williams, M.A. :Attain of Wt Foundation. lAtelyatt Long Crendon, Wcsi, of New College, Oxford. • daouary 8, aged 40, in consequi exercise of the pious duty of visiting bert blayow, curate of St. Thomas'r interred there on Saturday se'imigt on one: sensible of his worth boars clothed the pulpit, rladiet, msbkideo, attended the solemnie geothinski In mourning, with ' preceded the hearse which cons% whilst the poor, in crowded grvl which ischred all that remained and benefactor. The servics Peel; and many a tear was shed .who el few months before had r was then—" By sitrangers honor . • Last week, on Far Cross Ban' bower, aged 73—a man whott an abject of disgol to all his neigi comnion necessaries of life. ties !Tense of - poverty and wretrleednes , race and the love of hoarding ' clothes,.which•leaVe long been 4 xdostantly wore were vo comp: possible to distinguish the old standing his frugality in dress, day& before his decease, for a coal he obtained. He never frtqr preferred ipebding the Sunda) werod coning. lk contrived cheat the parish of Maitsrigg,near ahhnuo:i possessed of a convene' tre iii mogl. His funeral' blucher y, converting the !muse • PaICE OF 610 C 113nk Stack s Ltr Ct. Red. 41:111if DiTio C0n4.68i d 3 • ever Cent a..aut s.ens Cent. .9: nit Lung Anna. la 9-IG, ~aips Mv ( 14.1. 1. 1"11 :14 E s 95 .Neweaule N Sunderland Staffordabir • C oal •ru viueeui • sluining • • .494rnnon • . 140(1)011: I'riati , l by I.Lvit. Kau:, T i cket-l''x•; I'ubiskbed auslat Ws Stat.-Ufbcs, femple.l3l:. ~. IN. IJIALANZ). sir O'cliek in the evertirg, T. SERJEANT, Curate cf f,C nd an active Magistrate ~i r entered by a part, of fret rants, and collected all ;Ee away, a lter . wbich they e l- Itet t ie, and passed.the coca, ' unch, waiting the :4rt;vAltl 1 r. S. returning he heard a iis there i tleo often inure. I I ich In. attesripted to retin a . . • Forttinately the : :me a 1 Aiciou,lf loaded, that boa A le body, and . perforate 4 flit ' d Tin, did him very :Lae ' ing the fellers sopi:osei t , i. [el) , joined their p;:rty ii t es. ird odall . the clotte:r., h 'use. proceeded shout ' three viler i i]• ARNHAM, and entered so s tch dt toe house of ft , •';e tt 1 leant cf the Ist Ballyjatte, as to be et his bedside belle e being in the house. Hz torn ras near his bed, and kn9ckPd and his wile gallantly tern. eceived a shot, whic!. frviite it, and the same moment it I 'bow by a blow with t fire. shot in the other arm th a t :h he and his wife were aten ° o be left for dead, when the melee the louse, and (7.,eam: i him of better than xeJ to • property. .._........_. . asserts; that the Trinity Cols 1 re recently come to a resolo. 1 t'stAMOuS a Treatise nu Go. 1 liege course I lid last week by J. nrin, of ' trifler, against three Medical r, Wilts; for selling Spitilsti tit license. The Magistrate . pins; the. informers, on the ine are a medicine; and ad. ' 4 ' claim to the appellation of o ensage in so int:mous rid I We. H. LAND, of Sea Steen reek ploughed up, in one c oinea coined in the reign c 'reservation. Money Id t h e. coined by that Monarch and eing made of gold inipcued Ifrican coast, which gees b. • ...-- . •1 Ntatta.). • t. John, Harry Sellers, R.N. , r 'fakir Bull. • . Hall, Esq. of Madras, to Met o.4iies, hi. of his Majesty's li • I: is Green, Mr Wan HrweLov, • a a Miss Duggan,' of bole Vat. I • e years of age, attr a ct the to Imo It ! So impatient waren , ti , ast he arrived in Car!isle os. fr. lay beifotre day•Sght, and 6. - .litqf ' • 1 loth," he engaged is hoax ant: • ' e preferred to- ap trber) in .. • ns; "on the wings of love.' I Adel of his tee, and die • ~ . Itifth glee, where they west ' ' n Ma in the village. In the me . s ; perbil were iiut in requisatioli, S-• wake tin slate hoer by theta say elf the multitude!, • )lED. the oath year Of hts age', GEbi the , -• • • - _ b Hon. Agnes Pr zwlllarq. 7 in, Captain WnC Hiintay; Of !! • slighter of the We Dr. We. 1 . ife of Mr. John Bishop, oversee the celebrated Rashest iittlfit, r i st beautiful lit et. a v. Johti Chides William". M , Orford, eldest son of tbt R iteenurcb, Hance. P Arch, Hams, the Rev. ;old Cb W ..- Worcester College on Mts. Los 0 Buckt, to his 201 Is year, N.:f• a d. sequence of a fever caugY. in : b visiting the Kick pow, the Rev. h P tonnes Chapel, Ardwirk. fie w Ei might. His funeral was not a tb, his congregation and hi. ref J. ing desk, fte a with mourning; pity of his interwmt. Akont 6 , 6 bat.l.ands, provided itiallvi , lua riveted has refrain, to their hm • groupe- i assembled to ~: t ,let .1 kJ at their truly ChtiV , :6ll nt :Ls . - e. :;. was read by"„the kev.Frede i. a. died around the grave h f psi ' I' I never heard the 141114: of I hr....* s i lamed cid by strsi;:er..••• , :as - V auk, Kei.dal,'Wiiiaant 11-tc6eil, a J. ) i e ritt i i i s ig sh ga ixa; r : d ,re l s. y 2r da z,r ia: c r ee .. d : , t e i x o nit is iebe i t o l eh al ..in er rist etl .t i: .fines,, mere! i le n to a spirit of :.; tar tLotar:ll he had pito /At , J I co l:signed in the woms, thaw ' ) pier ly I.a..iled as to ratite it d from the new cloth. • , he . ari Led t! tt. Chi:lama!, a ;• coat 'ci'oi h'i 0 :. riblic ehat;:y,.. , n mentei any place of .sursalp, lay in his com:ron occartiso for the two last reari of ris let ear IJlverston, out of a mast • ' cutout house, some furniture. ' i %vas a sceve of feriviiy :.•:d: : of mutat:ire into.alouseet r..•;'• ---:._-, • CKS' YESTERDAY. . llnalan Mock I '.::4• • • 1 laio:., Boi.cls 66 ii Fr. imp. Ann. ' • ' ILath...quer 111111 18 )IPe• Cons. suer arc. siSift Lottery I ieliits tadO t s• E l',' JANUAlalwr.. ps sold.. .- • .Prie , I- , 12 ' 4Cfra..titi..io 4 3 ' 4 11., 1 • • so, si..t: to 01. 01- f • l .. ... AK l. dd.. - autt 7 =WN llo44 aAslh. • J Mi.% r.!te: 6 • 0 --- • .16vit. Kiu r, ilaket-Iratr; the Star:-Ulhee, l'empla43o.