Star. — London, England, 1808-07-21 00:00:00

LAW INT:ELEI6.ENG.E. SUMMER ASSIZES.--NORTHF.RNCtn. Mr. Justice CHATilitt—Mr. Baron Woos. City of York, and County of the sunk City—Saturday, July W s at the Guildhall of the said City. Yorkshire—The same day, at the Castle of York. Durham—Tuesday, August 9, at the Castle of 1) ter haat. Talon of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, and Count.-of the samf town.. Saturday August 13, at the Guildhall octite said t6wn. Ncrthumberland—The same day, at the Castle of Newcastle. upon Tyne. Cumberland—Friday, August 19, at the City of Carlisle. "Westmorland —Thursday, August 25, at Appleby. Lancashire—Monday, August 29, at the Castle of Lancaster. OXFORD cutcurr. Mr Justice LAWRtHC.X—Mr. Justice Ls BLANC. Berkshire—Thursday, July 28, at Abingdon. Oxfordshire--Saturday, July sO, at Oxford. Glouceseershire—Wednesday, August 3, at GlouCester. City of Gloucester—The same day, at the City of Gloucester. Monmouthshire—Saturday, August 6, at Monmouth. Herefordshire--Tuesday, August 9, at Hereford. , Shropshire—Saturday, August 13, at Shrewsbury. Staffordshire.—Wedueaday, August 17, at Stafford. Worcestershire--Saturday, August 20, at Worcester. City of Worcester—The same day, at the City of Worcester. MIDLAND CIRCUIT. Mr. Justice Gcost —Mr: L'aron THOMPSON. Nerthamptonshire-z-Tuesday, July 26, at Northampton. Rutlandshire—Friday, July 29, at Oakharn. • I.incolnshire-*--Saturday, July So, at the Castle of Lincoln. City of Lincoln—Same day, at the City of Lincoln. ' Nottinghamshire —Thursday, August 4, at Nottingham. Town of Nottingham—Same day, at the Town of Nottingham. Derbyshire—Saturday, August 6, at Derby. Leicestershire —Thursday, August 11, at the Castle of Leicester. Borough of Leicester—Same day, at the Borough of Leicester. City of Coventry—Saturday, August 19, at the City of Coventry Warieicksbire—Same day, at Warwick. NORTH WALES SUMMER CIRCUIT. HUGH LRYCISTF.R, F.ll4l.—Sir THOMAS PLUMRR. Merloneththire--Tuesday, August 23, at Dolgelly. Carnarvonshire—Monday, August 29, at Carnarvon. Anglesey—Saturday, September 8, at Beaumaris. CHESTER CIRCUIT. • Rosert DALLAS, E sq .—F RA NCIS BURTON, Egg. Atontgomeryshire--Thusday, August 25, at Pool. Denbighshire--Wednesday, August 31, at Ruthin. Flintshire—'cutvlay, September 6, at Mold. lhosbire--Monday, September 12, at the Castle of Chester. ISLE OF ELY ASSIZES. EDWARD CHRISTIAN, Esq. ly—Wednesday, July 27. fendant was a poor man living at beat, and on his s:paration from his wife, he settled on her 201. a year as a separate maintenance, which was as much as his 1 circumstances could afford. She had a house in Rase- • nary-street, Clerkenwell, and hid made some money in letting lodgings. Having afterwards fallen into ill health, she went to the house of the Plaintiff, who was married to her sister, aad lived there for six 1, months., The Trustees of the deed of separation had , paid the Plaintiff during that time the sum of 101. , being half a year's allowance ; but the Plaintiff con sidered himself entitled to bring his action against the husband for necessaries furnished to his wife, ac cording to the fair and reasonable value. A point of law arose upon this c a s e ; whether an action would lie against a husband from a tradesman for necessaries furnished to a wife, when, it was known by the tradesman that the wife war separated from her husband? Lord ELLENDORMIGII conceived that it was now generally understood that the action would lie,but that . the husband might be indemnified by the trustees to the deed of separation. In the present case, however, it appeared that the Defendant's wife had some money when she went into the ilaintiff's house, which•money was really the property of -her husba ,- .J, and which she ought to have applied, as far as it would go, to- wards paying her necessary expences. The Jury, after a short consultation, found a ver dict generally for the Defendant. COURT OF COMMON FLEASOULY lE. ?REMELT v. MILES, KRT. AND ANOTHER. This was an action of Traver, to recover back ,the possession of certain goods which the defendants, She-1 riffs of Middlesex, had seized, by-virtue of g Writ of Executioa. It appeared that the goods of a Mr. Whit. tington had been detrained for the sum of 251.. arid that the Plaintiff, who is a broker, paid the money and took the goods. Whittington afterwards applied to him to have the goods, which the Plaintiff agreed to let him have, at the rate of 9s. per week.. He con tinned, therefore, in possession of them up to the month of August, when another execution was levied. Itwas on this writ that the present action was brought. There appeared, however,to be no agreement between the parties, and Sir JAMFS MANSFIELD - observed, that the Sheriff was not bound to know that the goods were not those of Whittington's, against whom he had an execution. Plaintiff Nonsoited. FALSE I>IFIUSONMENT...--WARD t? UEOR v. ifOHNION. This was an action for an assault and False Impri sonment. The circumstances of the case were as fol low :—Mrs. Ward is the wife of a weaver in Spital fields, and on Saturday, the 50th or Novemhnr, at ten o'clock at night, went in company with five wo men, all in the employ of her husband, named Mary Cornish, senior, Mary Cornish, junior, (the daughter), Elizabeth Howard. Elizabeth aliock, and Margaret Quince, to the shop of the Defen dant, a linen-draper, in Bi.hopsgate-street ; there three of them made purchases, while Eliz. Bullock stood at a short distance, after which they all left the shop. On the Monday following the two Cornishes and Mrs. Ward went again to the shop, and looked at some cotton prints. The defendant's shopman amused them while his master sent for a Police Offi cer, and charged Mrs. Ward and Mary Cornish, jun. on suspicion of stealing, or being accessary thereto, of a piece of cotton, on Saturday night preceding. They were taken to the Police Office, and the result of the examination was, that they were all discharged. The whole of these u-omm were examined, and denied that they stole the -,.)..t0n. Masrm, the Officer, proved that when they were at Worship-st. eet, Mrs. Ward twitched one of the young women by the gown, in of der to induce her not to tell where Elizabeth F ui,ock lived. The def . 1, - :-ailed, that he had lost a piece of cotton, and he had probable reason for sitFect ing sonic one of the persons of stealing it, he there fOre justified on that ground. He called several witnesses, consisting of his own servants, to shew that this piece of cotton had been cut off for Margaret Lannon, one of his servants ; that it was placed on the counter near where Bullock, one of the young women, stood ; that soon after they had quitted the shop it was missed, and that search was made all ever the house, but it could not be found ; it was therefore supposed they must have taken it. The shop was shut up before these pe..pie entered, and the lamp was nearly out. Sir JAMES MANSFIELD was of opinion the defendant had made out his ground ofjustiszation, and therefore the plaintiffs must be nonsuited.—PlaintiffsNonluited. AN M l .../ t.i.• 1,. Rutlandshir I.incolnshie City of Lin, Nottingham fawn of N Derbyshire Leicestersh Borough of City of Coy WariVicksh 1 Hui Nferlonethi Carnaryorts Anglesey- - Rol Afontgome Denbighshi Flintshire- Cheshire— gly—Wed . Gott this was an as uncle house, it Mr. Ell' r• conditio beer. ist a ren the • Pia in defau be raise , the a 2 1 The tontine aners cc beer, at him. ' Brewer thence; and as to supi of this his old increase Elliot, a distil viz. 12 ditione tiff rep Defrnc rlainti The was tie in takii being The ved, tl misiste bition his spi the el( could To date's agree , howe' said 1 bighe Or Mr. ( ted u penal anti t ter of cf co It to sh with I.( t vide it mt with *Li the a one, ()the, i him be h tOlTli • hay( . beer of 11 • Mes i thci . i . that Jury Plai Bre .ti dar rily 1 the It 1 li the • ; -,, COURT OF KING'S BENCH, JULY 18. ,(MEDEN-LANE BREWERIC..—COOPER irwYBILL. This was a case of considerable importance. It vests an action of Replevin, brought by the Plaintiff under tenant under the Defendant, of a public• acme, in Charles-street, Hatton-Garden, which house )4r. Elliot. the brewer, let to the Defendant, upon the condition that the Plaintiff should continue tO take his beer. The lease of these premises was fcr 21 years, lit a rent of 52 guineas per year, with a govision, that the. Plaintiff should take all his beer ofMr. Elliot ; • default of his taking the beer, then the rent was to )e raised to 120 guineas per annum, over and above the a 2 guineas per annum. The Plaintiff, it appealed, for a considerable time, Continued to take beer of Mr. Elliot, but his custo mers complaining repeatedly of the bad quality of the beer, and finding no amendment, left off dealing with him. The Plaintiff then had recourse to the New Brewery, in Golden-lane, and procured a supply from thence ; stuck up a bill in his window to that effect, and as a further invitation to his customers, promised to supply them at 4.-kcl. per pot. The consequence of this proceeding was, that in a short time not only Ais old customers returned, but his business greatly increased, in the proportion of three to one. Mr. Elliot, upon this, put in force the covenant, and made distress upon the Plaintiff's goods for the penalty, viz. 120 guineas per annum over and above the con ditioned rent in case of taking beer of him. The Plain tiff replevied the distress, and brought his action. The. Defendant avowed for the rent nomine pane, and the plaintiff replied, putting all the special matter in issue. The question now at issue was, whether the beer was not of so bad a quality as to justify the Plaintiff In taking his beer from another person to prevent his being ruined in trade ? The ATTORNEY GENERAL, for the Plaintiff, obser ved, that Mr. Elliot was once a candidate for West- ' misister—he did not succeed in that object of his am bition ; that, however, was not very singular, for if his speeches had not more spirit in them than his beer, the electors would not relish them, and therefore he could not expect to be elected. To prove the bad quality of the ci-devant candi date's beer, twelve witnesses were called, who all agreed as to the bad quzlity of it. Some admitted, however, that at times it was better ; while others said that it was offensive in taste and smell in the highest degree. On the part of the Defendant it was contended by Mr. GARROW, that the breach having been commit ted under the covenant, his client was. entitled to the penalty. Mr. Elliot was the owner of the house, an therefore was interested in preserving the charac ter of it, and consequently would not pursue a line of conduct which would injure his property. - It was proposed by Mr. GARROW to call witnesses to shew that his customers were generally satisfied with his beer. Lord ELLENaoaoroit however held, that such evidence could not apply to this action, inasmuch as it must be shown, that the Plaintiff had been served with good beer. 'Lord Ectmeaonovoit, after stating the nature of the action, observed, that the covenant was a severe one, such as he hoped never to see introduced into other leases. The. Plaintiff was justified in relieving himself from the pressure of such a covenant, for if be had continued selling this beer, not only his cus tomers would have fallen off, but the Plaintiff might have subjected himself to an indictment for selling beer unfit for public use, and injurious to the health of his Majesty's Fubjects. He had no doubt that Messrs, Elliot and Company meant to deal fairly by their customers; but it was his duty to proceed on that which appeared to him to be evidence. If the Jury believed the witnesses, they must find for the Plaintiff, for he was justified in dealing with another Brewer, the covenant therefore was °lna avail. A Verdict was taken for the Plaintiff in nominal damages of One Shilling, which, however, necessa rily imply a return of the goods distrained. JULY 20.—rtter V. MARSDM This was an action for the board and lodging of the Defendant's wife, charged at npvrards of It appeared on the trial, that tht Defendant ard his eiiife-had been separated for near 20.yeass, although the deed of separation was not produced. The De- TRESPASS.-DRUSISIOND V. ZIVDEGATE. - - - This was an action of trespass, brought to try the right to a fishery in a certain ditch branching off the River Colne, in Hertfordshire. The plaintiff claim ed in right Of the Mayor and commonalty of London ; and the defendant, Sir Roger Newdegate, in right of his manor. It appeared from the whole of the evidence, that though the Newdegate family had claimed the right to the whole or half of the fishery in question, the claim had seldom Or never been allowed, and the weight of posse , .sion, as well as reputation, was in fa ' your of the Mayor and commonalty of London. Vet diet for the plaintiff. JULY 110.-stocif Atseretrie+oWOOPE 'Montt. This was an action to recover the value of some beds and . lines , tassels and pallies for wirklow-turaiAt, alledged by the Plaintiff td hale been sold hi hint to the Defendant. The defence set niS was, that the lines, tassels, and putties hid been already paid - for, and that the beds had been fornished only on trial. The plainff, it apie are d In ev;_dence had a house, No. 13, Hanover-street, Hanover-square, whete..he sold goods, by auction. .The custom was, as stated by one . Wicks, who had been in the Plaintiffs service, to get goods from different tradesmen, and to sell them at this place, which had ever y appearance of a handsome privatehouse, as the property of some one deceased, or going abroad, &c. The Defendant, a special, pleader, who wanted to furnish a house, seeing an advertisement that the furniture of T. Alexander, Esq. deceased, was to be sold by auction at this house, went in and bought goods to the amount of 2001. and upwards, and among the rest some window curtains. When these were sent home, he expressed his surprise that they wanted the tassels and putties, &c. which had certainly belonged to the curtains he had bought. An excuse was made at the time, and lines, tassels, and putties were afterwards sent. He also applied to the Plaintiff for the beds in question, which the other agreed to provide. Happening to pass near the place, some time after, he saw that another sale was going on in the same house, and stepping in, found his old friends the different tradesmen there , and a good deal of the property set up again which he had seen sold before. 'Lis having raised some suspicion, he refused to take the beds, unless he might first have them on trial. To this Wolfe, the 'auc tioneer, agreed, according to the testimony DI-Lewis Nimmo, a pupil of the Defendant. -Lewis Nathan, an embroiderer in the Strand, de posed, however, that hi had applicd'to the Defendant for payment, and that the Defendant had said that he would next day see Mr. Wolfe, and pay the bill ; the inference from which was, that the property had been sold outright. Before the end of two months from the time of delivering the beds—two months, according to the evidence of Crompton, a bed-maker, being a reasonable time for trial---the Plaintiff ar rested the Defendant, and commenced an action.— The Defendant, rather than have any dispute about the matter, offered to pay for the goods, but refused to pay the costs. • This offer was rejected, and the action proceeded. Sir J. MANSFIELD, C. J. in summing up the evi dence, remarked upon the improbability of the testi mony of Nathan, as to the Defendant's engaging to pay the bill, which included the lines, pales, and tassels, for which the Plaintiff had certainly ;,iia de mand. The Jury, after deliberating a few minutes, found a verdict for t'.e Deiendaiv. BIRTI4. on the 16th ituta lit I•wm_keitham, Lily Elizsbeth DSEI). Sunday bat, Mrs. !Minsley, wife of Edward Bi 'df Aockavold, Not Lb. Toe, niornhrit, at her house In Pdttitoks-squitte, a rm. a ion illftess, wki...h she am p7nrted with the' gre , a4 „ i d s a ri4 resignation, the Right Ilou. the Dowager Lady Ittas, iri the Cowl , yof Way-a ieh. HIGH WATER h'l' LONI)GN EkIDGE 116torAig - 0 minutes after Afternouh - - 27 minutes after SLANDER.-KENDALL V. WRIGHT. This was an action on the case for malicious words. The Defendant pleaded the general issue. The Plaintiff is a house-keeper in the Strand, and the Defendant had been for some time his lodger. It was clearly proved by several witnesses, that theDe fefidant had, at various times and places, called the Plaintiff a rascal., and said that lie had sometimes at tempted his life with a pistol on the Steine atßrighton —that he had stolen his watch,umbrella, &c. and that he was a swindler. It appeared, however; tintiCen; dall had continued to let his lodgings to Wright for three or four years subsequent to the uttering Of these words. Mr. Serjeant LENS, for the Defendant, there- ; fore contended that these words could not. be consi dered as a serious charge of felony against the Plain-. tiff—but they were words without much meining, spoken in the heat of the moment, owing to some dis putes about tent : That they had never done any real injury to the Plaintiff, who himself appeared.to think lightli of them, front the circumstance: of- his having continued the Defendant as his - loslgat,--Vatotios for .the Plaintiffs. damsgesi4Os. - • . COURT OF EXCHEQUER, JULY IS. TUE NINO v. COTHOKPE AND OTHERS. This was an indictment by which it was sought to condemn, as a legal seizure, 36 boxes of crown glass, the property of Mr. Cothorpe, and the other partners of Messrs. Lucas and Co. glass manufacturers, near Bristol ; on which it was alledged they had received the - drawback, as for exportation, but which, after being Shipped, had been relanded, and were after wards found in the Defendant's warehouses ; also for certain penalties of 201. each, on a variety of boxes of glass, from which it'was also alledged the Defen dants had taken off the official seal, after they were marked for exportation, without applying fur libe; ty to do so, or calling in the Revenue Officer to be pre sent while it was done. Evidence, seemingly very satisfactory, was adduced on the-part of the Crown, to show that the boxes in ' question, frcm thc_ corresponding weight, &c. formed part of certain export certificates, on which a draw back must have been allowed to the Defendants.— The higher Revenue Officers also proved, that they seized in the Defendants' warehouses, fifty boxes of glass, from which the stamps had been broken off. In answer to this case, it was proved for the De feneants, that, of an order for 83 boxes of crown glass fcr which a certificate had been received, the order as .to forty of the boxes had been countermanded, and a new certificate gra lted. It had, from inadArtency, however, been ordtted to distinguish in the new cer tificate the particular boxes -which were to bus export ed ; in conscerenc! of whichit was made to compre hend eighteen bor's of larger weight and dimensions than those actually exported, and which being after wards found in tt►e Defendants' warehouse, induced a suspicion that they had been re-landed after being shipped. It was, however, clearly made out, that none of the forty-three boxes actually shipped for ex portation had been re-landed, but that they had formed part of the unfortunate shipments to Buenos Ayres. In this situation the Somerroa-GENEitax. declared himself satisfied, without enquiring into the other points of the case; and a Juryman was accordingly withdrawn. Of course the property. seized on will be returned. To THOMAS TAYLOR, ESQ. No. 9, NEW BRIDGE-STREET, LONDON. SIR -,-I consider it but an act of justice' due to the clerics of your LEAKE's PATENT PILLS, to communicate to you the following Cure, which has rocenriy been performed by there :—An acquaintance of mine, who by the breaking out .4 an old Venereal Complaint (attended by, a complication of dis or4ers arising tberefi•om) was reduced almost to a skeleton, :ad 1 although be had the best medical advice which cc uld be obtained, and tried a variety of patent medicines, nothing could he procured which seemed to suit his case, or to do him any service; he it mained in a most reduced and pitiable situation for two yeses, unable to follow Ills profession, and scarcely able to walk or even ta stand on his h gs; it fact no one who knew hint ev:r supposed 4 possible for him to recover. He was advised at last to truss - THE IEING v. WILLIAMS. LEAK.E'S PILLS.,-he did so , adhering strictly to the directed This was an indictment for 'a fraud on the Rev?, given with them—be had not taken mere than two boxes, bd . art , he flund an alteration for the letter ; this encouraged We to nue, in the collection of the Post-limp Duty. proceed, and by taking a le* bores. more he found his apPeti m The SOLICITOR GENERAL stated, that it Was a prat- andstrength gradually return, and is now is healthy and stout * tice too common among persons licens ed to let p ost any man I know. You are welcome, Sir, to refer ;my ptsrll w horses, to take full 'duty from their employe rs, a nd to doubted.i ne for .I Jam, , your r of o the .en abv t o hu e acieco,eunt, servant it should P pay the Revenue with the duty attached, to what is • Library, Felketooe,iuly 10, 1605. THOS. PURDAY. called An airing. This was a practice which it was prepared and sold by the sole Propietor Thomas Tartar. extremely dif fi cult to detect, and therefore, When it Member of the Royal College of Surgeons, London, at his Ilotiers could be traced, was the more deserving of punish_ No. 9, New Bridge-street.; where, after a constant residence e+l t. more than forty years, in a practi ce particularly directed to rte men II was dearly made out, that where the Defendant Cure of Venereal Complaints and those incidental t o the Parts of Generation in both sexes, with that inviolahl.; secrecy I ' l 'l a horse-hirer, in Lincoln, had received ditty for five , men of his profession should always observe, he flatters hiMseas miles and back, he had in his weekly tettirn, account- the advice a nd assistance be g ratuitousl y administers to Pen"' taking this Medicine, will be esteemed, by a discerning Public. ed only for one mile. a• in soverestge seldom to be.obtaioed,and void of ainhissitr• Mr. SCARLET?, for the Defendant, however argned ~,,...„, ~,, hu .n ' that the return could not be received in evidence, t i ', - , az t ,74, s % ' thPaini"emeperfumeti' for .the convenience of thew unless proved by - the - person whose name appeared as . Pall rs - Mall • the u lOy at -shop, No. 194. Oifoid.street ; Mr. Dieter P- witness i to it. This he maintained was a settled point, rough's; 2•lb. 7, vistvatreei-hiu; lir. Raster s, South-bridle. 's, No. s 5; St. Albin's4tvet „, sary to an instrument Edinburgh ; feAr; liiPDostald's, Olaspwi Me. Calfroll's,Dbl i 7; that whither a witness was necessary M•r• Binifße's. Liverpool ; MS.Atkititon's‘ Manchester ; a ai I or not, Wer herev the natne of a witnest did appear, the instrument could la 'be - proved only by the testimony one nin eve 'ofry enetideratite town in Great Britain and let cd,int only Zs 9d. tsch, Yeaded up with felt and plain of that witness. - 'directions, whereby pertain' itleitlier Eat may cure thon t4ves 'The LORD CHIEF 'BARON said this was the general , with east , speed , tegnigiOnta a ft l l• i h a 'rule, but the resent case afforded an exception. 'Mere IcaL'Evet7.Bea edit In Gillet. WIWI it iteelel UP I°- ; _. I the signature of the 'Clerk nor other perstin, Who re. ..the .Statup-gffice—T. Taylor. No. 9. Nolv diridge-street &map, on soitith, lay-favour of the Ceinuaiesieness is prints t.: O cehe the ditties, was required, not to the execution- imitate vehiClas Felotiii atforill otbera are counterfeit. 'of the deed, 'but as a'tiact:El:kn.:: • corroboration and ..—........--;--. e ---------"'"--- attestation - of the fact. • •". - ~--. 'the Defendant Wit-accordingly tonvieted in ti'm - teilalaty Place,'Lambetb, settle STait.tWrict, yo. 1, Cuey ppopyrs : ,ropted 4.. t... 6:).5.:.,k ly LEVEL. KENT, of -'-' o ' penalty of 501. street. P•Mished ataa at OK STILI-01,:,,Ce. Temple Bar. . , t • • • '4- • NUMBER 60 srAri OF Whl 7. ii Plises r irl HE Drawing very unfertunati %.5,0q0 Tickets to Pea AUGI I'ouß, DAYS GRAND PRI 21 a.c. &A. &c. tet rema .Tuxa.)Ay, A UX Slues, j e tteksohice, AAl'4 • Hlii:3'icket M ream& A Zia ares by 7',Nretiri..l . . tyre Z wliereficle gum ern The ne ,!1 11 1-4q l F t • TW.O FRIZEE ..ftNHp.kt.D§ON,- orner o't . 10,197., Mprxii aad Teßlitatgyrah ; 2,109, dfuen Eight Sixteenth Sha NAM 'and. Share W - WriIAILDSOW, • GO There at And a gre The next DaY of ;Lottery will tislialion • T 7 UPWARDS OF £ YET FIFTH DAY ONI ;..fvery Capital yt:t sol t:ol•s4lllttic h e.-I. o ; e epe No. - . fire A110114 , 44-r PO. fort-la:ire • wive ott.tieutand, ti Ittarl 4 1 "7"' fines t • - • •••• • • - • ,551 ' 90 173 10,276 ...... 42,662 AslThere No. 257( *as N. B. All Orders Aba,rei may be had, Agent* the Count (lot Fes S IA L .Iriin moulds, , Linea, Muslin, Lace for Lemons, price 1 I, an not only irefftca kaink it necessary t Salt of Lemons is on' 401ckaput-street, t what has MY sign *silo of the serapp .0)1. B. 'l'be Salt wish' ag their hands Vitou cd gloves, &c. s itself. iithesattle plate 1044 g Greasit oW To One large ' ENTICK'S ENCHASH-L4 of Gilatlmar School Words and Phrasei • cormatiled with evi other Dictionaries,; /trek each hoed - at _debt authera in the • To tbli Edition aid Su/ By Nt 1.• Rector . ._„Pyiited for I. N livulde and Robins, Pbte and WU Davies: H.D.Sym li„Richsrdson; ,q'iaiosigtnan;, 1-1 Fftd"Wihio4 'arid Sn The tyrori IMPestely, price .6, This C .au_ "ENGLISH Cl Mai . 4 . 41 the fir n 94-le.,Qrthogra • e ; andin Etyl I r iciar of Biddulph P Cok, , aged 75 f f.rti- ly • L)lt 'WAN. 1 ys dense Cr.a4dpek-: ti!he ; Wilson and *f !' The antiquity pe r sinsod l y cf ti , 'rend( t rEwhich we hi Pie pieta an AN kLkko hY.th 444),0dy ton tio she rnigible to yost . Nr . isintiirrnatton Fee .ao; •Crt-44131 IMPORTANT 1):SCO% ERY. THE AdV;lntar. the Public must aiWay. ,e troth regishtily educated professional men directing almost exclusively their studies to one species of malady, was ilea r 11 1 We clearly demonstrated than by the unexampled s trees i h has attended the administration of their new remedy, and the eatraor. L ilitiary cures it has performed. For a long ,cries of years, Coasts an; Co. Surgeons, formerly in his 1\ lajasty's si nice, have made the Venereal risease the particular object of dun hives& gallon, and are happy in laving diScovecel a medicine sq-rior ice mercury in the cure of that complaint; it is salfici „ a wry . ; that the &errs of this remedy are diaimitrically up 'sit,. ;elbow of mercury, for though it co,iipletely eradicates tv , y vestige the virus, in its most confirmed stages, yet it does n t leaf injure the constitution ; on the contrary, it enovat in all its natural functions,. promotes appetite, and • • ; , .e.,, gestion : thus instead of reducing a strong and vigorous constitu. tion to the frightful edition that nrarcury does, it out only lit serves that constitution in its primitive state, but restores a vitak and debilitated one to its natural strength and vigour. Numtcr. less instances are on recent record of the superior eillcacy of ;his medicine, its inherent and specific virtues acting as a piirpeit.:2 corrective to bodily debility, whether proceeding from an excess of conjugal or illicit pleamre, or tront the more insidious, thot.r,h not less destructive, indulgence of incautious youth of both sexes in a certain pernicious habit. Amidst the melancholy variay of disorders which are the consequence of tai, salitary vice, thite are none more afflicting than that distressing state o debility and de• ficiency which tires co.* or embitters the matrimonial state ; the unhappy sufferer broods over his misf:irtune, ashamed :Ost.,k re. lief, until he is reducA to such a state of weakness as to tender life oppressive. To sun h p.orsom, it must 1.” a consoling team. tion to know, that they may now, by a new infallible mode of treatment, be restored to that greatest of all human blasings, a strong, manly and vigorous comaitittion.• • In all cases of &Inlay, dt ticiency, from whatever cause arising, as well as in every armies of venereal I:feet:On, Moe rs. Currie and Co. "say he consulted by patients of either sea with the greatest secrecy, and honour, at their house, No. 107, flattnii• Garden. Patients in the country, describing the particulars at their complaints, by I,..tter post paid, enclosing a llar.k note, will have the necessary medicine and advice sent to any rirt of the kingdom. No. 107, Hatton Carden. ANTI-IMPETIGENES, For those deplorably, and hitherto Incurable Diseases, the King's J-;vil, Scrotela, Strent, Scurvy, Gout, Rheurnatitm, Piles. Le prosy, and all DiSorders ori mating In an impure state of the Blond. . 'I I HE ANTI-TMPETICENES is founded on 2 chyrnical and philosophical bask, warranted by the expe rience of a series of years, sanctioned by " Cullen's Practice of Physic and Nosology," and prepared by S. SOLOMON, M. D. Gilcarl House, near Liverpool, Who pledges himself to the Paine, that this Medicine is perfectly innocent its its nature, safe in its application, and pose C3CiOUS in every species of " I mpetigenes, or deprave d with affections of the Skin."• It is of the utmost hopes-at:cc to those afflicted with any of these direful diseases, to the it frieeds and re latives,aa well as to the rising generation, that such hereditary complaints may be speedily removed, and the blood purified from every degree of miasma. • The King's Evil, Strums or Scrofn7a, are bard, schirrous, vsd often indolent tumours that affect the gl.mes of the neck, timer the chin, arm-pits, groin, hams, arms and waists, and nest cons. mtmly are seated in the neck and beneath the ears. To remove these obstinate symptoms, the whole Materia Atedica has been tried, with very little success, and the unhappy sufferer left to drag on a life of misery ! Many are crawling along on crutches at this moment, whom the Anti-Impe:igenes would restore to health and vigour, if recourse was had to it. The directionless& with each bottle ere plain, and its application Is attended with little or no trouble. The Anti-lanpetigines is an alterative and purifier of the blood, its operation if gradual, gentle, and almost imperceptible; it is the best substitute that has ever been discovered for that danger ous mineral Mercury; it swetens the blood and stinviLues it to expel all noxious and impure juices, giving strength and tone to the nerves, enlivening and invigorating both body and mind—For scorbutic cutaneous eruptions, dry or wet leprosy, the Anti-les petigines certainly claims a.pre..-erninence over all other medicines, being decidedly adapted for the speedy removal of these cone plaints, and will not only cleat the Ain, but heal all old sor.s ai.d ulcers of ever so long standing. In disorders where salivation has repeatedly failed, when no other remedy could restore the unhap py sufferer to that health he unfortunately lost, the Anti-Impeti •gincs wilt be found the great and only restorer of health and vigour. Proper directions for every case, to enable persons to cure elemseives, is given with each bottle, price Half-a-Guinea.—There are also family bottles, containing the quantity of four at 10s. od. for 595. by which As. is saved, including the duty; the Stamp has •s Sand. Solomon, Liverpool," engraited thereon, which purcha sers wil, do well to observe strictly before they buy. Sold by every respectable Medicine Vender in the United Kingdom. • Vide Cullen's Practice of Physic. ~ . ~~ .