Star. — London, England, 1803-12-22 00:00:00

7 I! . • % ... LAW' .11SITELLICiN.CA. COURT OF KINGS 11 ENCII, DEC 2o mvuo‘q..r •U. HOTtIAM AsD OTHERS. The ties io Otis cal....ne Al extremely ref ab/c. The Phrtitiff is Cartan litt,ldart, who W for ; I • d a , the mait.r of a fltip in the Arnetican tta‘h:. Richard Ilotham, whore repre fentative,. the d:f.::..lants etc, was engaged in EAR India aii..l the firopri,:tor of t i•f6tlis of the Royal Adron.il Indiatnan. Sir Richard having :1147 the rrevail , :d on him to leave tittiai ion, and to enter Imo the service ()Idle Company. lie at lir could only enter as fourth of. fleet- on board, lo th.i! there wee no great encourage ment i. r him, who was rat her advanct.%l in life,tn enter i, to ti c f e rvis-e ; Le however did enter into it, and was la• promoted to be the Captain of the Royal Ad• mind, pet formed four voyages in her. Before • time the ',..ommands of the Eall India fhips puffed f )m ban,! to band by file; bit afterwardsytin I t " . ..•uenee of nefolutions entceed into by that rich and li. lheral Company, no Glrain could be removed from his fit nation witliont content of the Court of Di. rettors. Sir Rehm,' Hothans being about to fell his fhip, afked the Plaintiff, Capt. Huddart, if he would give up his ll:nation as Captain, which, to oblige Sir I Richard Hotham, he did ; and by being able to fell the fitip witla•ut Any Captain bel, aging to Incr,Sir Richard had been enabled to get S.acol. more for his (hip than Le °thy-wile wouid have done; and Mr. GARROW enatended that Ilcocl. ought to be in the pocket of his client. It was not eii,puted that the plaintiff was in that Citation, and 'bat he had given it up. Captain Btinehaid was 'lie only witncf4 examined in the cattle. He laid he was very intimately acciu tin ted with Sir Richard Hotham t he Alfa knew Capt. Huddart; who was see Car -tin of the Royal Admi ral. Sir Richard Florham was pOireffCd Of 14-56ths of the Royal Adiriral. In :he year ISt.tt, he parted with all his interelt in that (hip. Captain Bond fuc- ceeded Captains Fludiart. He faid he had heard Sir Richard repeatedly fay, that he had promifed Capt. Huddait soool. to give up his fituation as Captain of the Ruyal Admiral. He believed he was appoint , cd to that lunation entirely from friendfhip : there friendfhips were very rare. Before the refolutinns of the EA! India Company, not to fell their commands, he had known 90001. given for focls a fituation : the fum, were veil , different that were given; he had very often known :toool. given. Sir Richard Hotham bad alfo provided I , r one of the fons of the Plaintiff, by appointing hint Captain of the York Bail India mass. The witnef, did not think that Capt. Huddart bad ever afked for this rood. from Sir Rich. Horham. Mr. Elisio.' was next heard on the part of the Defendants, who, he laid, from their fituation, were bound to defend this action. Lord ELLIt43OItOUGH obferved, that Sir Richard Hotham had carved out the law fortialfelf. He had made a promife to pay this Gentleman roool. and there was a confederation for that promife. There was no imputation whatever on the. Defendants in Vefißing this demand. They could riot do otherwife than have the pellilllll of the demand meafured by the verdict of a Jury.—The Jury found a Verdi& for the Plaintiff--Damages wool. twirls si rviasse. This aelon was brought to recover a mom of money tinder the following circumflances :—The Plaintiß being called upon to fell a large quantity of rum, brandy, and tobacco, to a gentleman, of the name of Gilbert, of the Nand of Guernfey, Mr. Gilbert be ing a Ilranter to him, he would not truß him with the property, unlefc he was guaranteed by Mr. Do. brat. He undertook to give Bills in favour of Gil bert, to the amount of yool. But after Gilbert had got the goods. he fent Dobree notice not to give the Plaintiff thefe Bills. It appeared. from the evidence of the Captain, thefe goods were flung, when they were put oo board, in (mall calks of about ty quarts, whereas the calks ought to have contained 6o gallons. And the Plaintiff having &Sled to de fraud the Revenue Laws of this country, it had been determined that he, under fuch circumilances, could not recover.—Verdift for the defendant. COPPINGIR AND co. V. JOHNSON AND CO.. This affirm was brought to recover :401. under the following circumtlances :—A Mr. Alkire, who lives at Rouen, fent syy bales of clover feed to be infured and ftild by them in this country. The plaintiffs ae corditigly infured them, and, when they arrived, be ing in p in ofa bill of lading, they paid the Cur. torn houfe duties, &c. The plaintiffs had been put to sonfiderable expence.. and jail when they were about to take poffellion of the goods in the river,theCaptain received orders from the Confignor not to deliver them to the plaintiff. but to the defendants. The plaintiffs had been reimburfeel the money' they had bid out, and ¶he defendants, who were only nomi :tally In offered to pay their commiflion on the in furance. But they silo in filled they had a tight to their cammitGon of a' per cent. on the fate. They contend ed, that the Conlignec bad no right, after they had engaged their refpcniibility, to take it out of their bands. • Lord F.l.Lswamtovorr &id, it might be laid demo ns a general principle of law, that wherever there was an authority g ven, coupled with an intereft, that that authority was not countermandahle. Here there was an authority to receive this clover feed, coupled with an actual in•creil. The plaintiffs had contrafted their refponfibility ; and, theiefore, that confignment could not be taken out of their hands, till they were relieved from that refponfibility. That was not done at the time, and, thcrciore;the plaintiffs, his Lordfhip thought, were entitled to a verdift. Verdi& fur plain. tiffs 2401. of %11%Cli V. ■OBINSON. This is one nat 14 ten codes for infurance, cnm menced by the nwners of the (hip Franklin, Captain }Alward Goodrtdge ; ti.; total amount of the value being 26,7011. r s. I ride trials had h" refereed until a deciflon was obrainedr.n rh..! 1, whether-the (hip named were :in American. and conferitientlA a neutral read, or otherwde. The owner Mas a Mr. Tubbs. a native ut America, aril a merchant at Liverpool ; and it was decided that hi, tertier.e:: or tlismiciliati , in at that port fur two years had deprived him of the right of neutrality. It wa. iolni.ted on the part of the De fendant, thr.t the 11.1intiff, who was a merchant at tl,e faid pert, was re.wrr:r to the extent flared, aid that t e were Ch;pred Mr hoard the ved:l named. r ilaip was deitinc.l from Liver?uol to Nqles, Pa- ltrrn . r., and Nl' fluta, an a tlAculty had been re moved, relpe&ii.g t. .e anfpontion of the two pin, Nat.le. and Palermo, lame the Judges. The fad on which the prelim aSifin is grounded, was, that, be ing infrared by the Defendant, the cleared out for Naples, and was cat - tented before the arrived at any port.. The Defendant contended l.e was not on the policA at all, and had paid the preinium into COWL MeirlS. ERSKINE, PARKE, ADAM, and GARRLEY were for the Plaintiff. _ . Mefrrs. Gaaaow, GI!/s, and Gliss for the De fendant. ..... Mr. ERS KIN E, for the Plaintiff, (fated, that the only qudlion on which the trial would turn was, if the veg . - fel were reprefented to be neutral, in a way amount inkt to a warranty, In as to invalidate tile infurance. lie laid nothing could he more dangerous, than care lefsly to admit parole communication to lupeeede written contra 1. The premium was fix or eight per cent. higher than was given at the time ou neutral veffels, and therefc-re no reprefentation of neutrality could be pretended. lie farther obferved. that the jn forance, which was at 58 guineas per tool. was to re turn four in cafe the failed with convoy, and he Rated this as an argument that the could not be reprefented as neutral, becaufe a convoy mutt be entirely deka for the protclion of a neutral relfel. The admitilons being read by the Clerk of the Court, _ _ . Mr. CARIV , W fpoke at confider:Me length for Deteu,lant. He entered into the decifion before Lor.l Kenyon on the impriTibility of admitting this velf_i to the neutral chara&er. If A reprefentation he given upon a material fie, calculated to influence the cm. dition of the contraEt, Inch contra& is void. The ha bit of confidence in Lloyd's ti , ffee Houle, In need - - fary to expedite Wind's, had diabliflied a fort of pa role communication which became a part of the con tra& ; and the quellion in thi; cafe was, if the broker had made fuel' parole communication as to the ntn. trality of the vdrel ; and if it fliould appear that he had fa done, the names of the Underwriters were to be confidered as effaced from the policy. Mr. Robinfon, a Policy Broker, was then called, who depofed that he was employed by one Le Snuffe, wit° was agent to the Plaintiff; that he recolletted this perfon reprelented the veffel as neutral, and that he himfelf in confequence reported it to the Defendant. Mr. ERSKINE having been heard in reply, Lord ELLENSOROCIGH.—The queßion is, if the re prefentations Bated have been made, and if thereby the Underwriters vide induced to contra& at a lower premium? if Inch he the cafe, the policy is void.— The whale depends upon the evidence of one witnefs, and you are to judge of the degree of credibility he deferves. The condition of the return of premium, in cafe of going by convoy, does not neceffarily im ply that the veffel was not reprefented as neutral, be. eaufe, on account of the ferocity with which the loft war was eondueted by the enemy, and the unjull de• cifions of fome of the foreign Courts of Admiralty, it was foie convenient even to protell neutral veffels by the gallantry of thole who fight under the Britifh flag.—Verdift for the Defendant. A fimilar verdift was obtained in the cafe of Mart den v. Dick. The fame Plaintiff and Parifh was pottponed, with coils, by the application of the Plain tiff, in the abfence of a material witnefs. The two following, Madden v. Walaford, and Madden v. Abbot, were decided, on the contrary, for the Plain tiff, the Defendants not being able to ellablifh that any warranty or reprefentation of neutrality had been given. On this occatimi, Lord ELLarisolouGH re marked, that the Jury were not at all chargeable with inconfiflency for the variation in their verdia in the halt two cafes, becaule fetch of the eaufes mull (land upon their feparate and independent merits; and however near the tefemblance might be, the redun dance in the evidence in the one, could not fupply the deficiency in the other. - DICEMSER 21. DOVER V. 61 L Er•lig, 'Kt This cafe was conduced with great eloquence, by Mr. ERSRINS, Mr. GARROW, Mr. WOOD. and Mr. BARROW, on the part of the Plaintiff; and by Mr. DALLAS and Mr. Grass, on behalf of the Defen dant. From the length of it, we can only-attempt to dcfcribe its outlines. It was, according to Mr. ER S RIR a's opening, an ration on the Bribery Ad, to re cover a penalty of pot. of the Defendant, Mr. Meaner, who is a very eminent (hip builder, and a Gentleman of the foil refpeEtability and charataer.— This anion was brought againli him, for corruptly giving a turn cf money to one James Sharp, to give him his vote at the laR General Eleftionr for the Borough of Hedon, in the EMI Riding of Yorklbire. James Sharp, who is by trade a tailor, and a labourer in the Ertl India Company's ware houfes, is a Freeman of that Corporation. The ac tion was brought to put in force one of the molt va luable Alts of Parliament on the Statute Book. It was unneccfary to enlarge on the importance of this caufe, before Gentlemen of the delcription he had then the honour of addrelling. There was among the cultoms of this Borough, one that was fingular. It was prefined, that every man who had flood a Candidate for this Borough, from time whereof the memory of man was not to the contrary, was a man of Ilrict honour ; and that whatever fums of money he might give to thole who had favoured him with their votes, after the Election, lie gave them no money before, nor mad.! any promife to that effeet. But it had been undcritood, in all times, that every Burgers who gave a Candidate what is called a plumper, (or Tingle vrte) was entitled to the funs of twenty guineas;—and he who voted for two Candidates, bad ten guinea:: lions each of them. This cafes he laid, woo:vi be made out moll entirely to the find. faCtion of the :try. The Learned Counfel laid he knew Mr. Mitas r. that he was a very eminent thip. wright ; but although this was a country fond of naval men, he hared when he found Mr. Malaer had A nne down to (land as a Candidate fir Hedon, an inland place in Vorkihire ; a Ihip wright living in London I However, when men had made large for tunes by fair Ind In-atourable means, he was very far from finding fault w , th them tor handing up to be public men, and to become Members of Parliament. Tla: Defendant paid ,harp, fir lt of all, 51. in a 51. Bank of England Note, and in half all hour alter Sharp paid it away to a perfon of the name of Lloyd, lit.chum he had been employed to make louse clodws, and which had been fpoiled by come ink that had ',tor Spilled upon them. He was not tlie only wane!. that would be called. He Should call Gther witncdes, and, among the relt he amid ca ll a O tt oleman, whore tell:ln:my would he liable to obfervations, Mr. Chilitopher Saville; formerly'' Christopher Atkinfon, who is one of the Members for Hedoti. His friends on the other fide would, he had no doubt, produce the Record of a con vielion for perjury againfl that Oentleman. • And Le might obferve, that the Attorney General of that day. (the prefcnt Lord Chief Baron) was not fatisfied with the Convitlion of that Gentle man in the Court of King's Bench before Lord Mansfield, and with his ruffering the puni(hment attaching on that offence. The Attorney Ge neral thought it hit duty ra,t to confider that to h.: a sufficient onnithment ;—but he brought him into the Court of Exchequer, in order to make relli. tution for the breach of his contracts. Accordingly the Attorney General filed his information againft Mr. Arkinfon, for rellitolion of the fums of which he was Itippofed to have defrauded the p ublic. He had to pals through that ordeal profecuted by the, Officers of the Crown, who mutt ufe eagles eye! for the of guilt. The conclulion of it was, that the Lord Chief Baron, afterwards Lord Chief Pl , lice Eyre, of whom every body mutt fay he was a jidge of gre it abilities and learning, and who ceYtainly did not relax in the administration of his ril ) lic duties, pronounced the Judgment of the Court, concluding in there words :—" This is the Book from which the accounts and payments were fr, , in time to time entered, from which the refult appears to me abfulute demonitration ; to the trtitti of which I,for one, find it impollible to withhold my :dent, and I have the authority of my brothels to hay, that upon an examination and contideration of the lubjett, they agree wi:h me in that opinion." So that it was found nothing was due to the Crown from this Gentleman. And thus, after having fuffered the utmott rigour of the law, and after being ex paced to that Ignominy, he at la.t received that de liverance which, be Paid, lte conlidered to be the greateft deliverance front the confequences of hu— man malice, and from the infirmities of human judg ment. The prefcnt cattle, important as it was, did not &terve to be named in the fame century with what he was then fpeaking of. It was a molt comforting cunfidelation, that no man in this tree country could ultimately fuller onjuttt.,. But every man of purity of conlcieuce, cf integtity and honour, one day or another, mull be delivered from.the confequences of injullice. In confequence of a corredt report of the proceedings againß this Gentleman, and their final refult being tranlmitted to the King, his Majefly was moll gracionlily pleated to grant him a pardon under the Great Seal. The firft material witnefs was James Sharp, who, after having been at a public meeting, and a fupper, with Mr. Maher, and lateen or teventeen of his friends, in OCtober, t Bor, called on Mr. Meßaer at his own honfe in Broad-ltreett He told him he was a freeman of Hedon, but he did not promife him his rote then, by reafon that Sir Liorfel Dare% at the former Eleaion in 1796, had difappointed him. He had only given him two ;guineas, and owed him therefore 171. tSs. for his vote. He Paid, he prm mired Mr. Metlaer his legal vote. He had not before that time feen any of Mr. Meflaer's money. Some time after that he called on Mr. Meßaer, and afked him, if he would pltafe to oblige him by lending him four or five pounds. He afked, if two or three would not do? The witnefsfisisf, two or three were too little, but four might do. Mr. Mellaer turned round, and gave him a 51. Bank of England Note, for which he gave Mr. Meftaer hi. own promitfory note, for the repayment of that firm on demand ; that note was not Ramped. At the eleaion he voted for Mr. Mel taer :old Mr. Johrdon, and when he was there he borrowed two guineas of Mr. Bower, Mr. Menaces Agent; and atter the eleaion, when he came to London, Mr. Meaaer paid him Ps. making in all ten guineas. When Mr. Cliriflopher Saville was called, Mr. Grass cleared he might be fworn to the dire, which ht was. Mr. DALLAS Paid, it was his duty to afk Mr. Saville a very unplealant quef Lion: Had he Rand in the pillory ? The witnefs anfwered, Yes. The learned Cnunfel fubmitted he was not a competent witnefs. He produced the re cord of the Court of King's Bench, of Lis convitlion for perjury, in die 23d year of the King, which was read. Mr. East's's admitted his competence was deßroyed by that conviction, but that he would re (lore it-by his Majeßy's mull gracious pardon, which Mr. Saviic ptoduced, and which was read. Mr. DALLAS Rill contended, that Mr. Saville having fuf feted an infamous ponifhment, was not a competent witnefs. But Lord ELL.NaoaOUCN was of opinion, that he was reftored to his competency by the King's pardon. The indiament fot perjury was founded on the Common-Law, and not on the ttatute, and there. fore it was competent to the King, in virtue of his prerogative, to reftore him to his former privileges and franchifes, though not to repeal an Aft of Par liament. Mr. ERS KIN I obferved, that this Gentle man had been examined at York and feveral other places fince he bad obtained his pardon. Here Mr. Saville was (worn, and before he gave 'any evidence, alked his Lnrdlhip if he might-be per. mitted to fay a few words? .. Lord E OROUCH laid, noir you are reflored by the pardon to your competency. The witnefs made the fame reivieft a feeond time, when Lis Lordflap laid, y-u are an abaraft perfon, I have nothing to do with your cafe. You (land now in the fame fituation as if nothing had pafTed. Mr. Saville, among many other things in hi: ell dente, (aid, he was at piefent one of the Members for Iledon, and that he had reprefented it in two for. mer Parliaments, ti-it is 17s o, and afierwartic in 1796. In tBor, he became acquainted with Mr. Meitaer, who was in the habit of calling upon him about that time ; tli.:y then mull: to art in col:junc tion, as Candidates at the then enfiiirig cleflion. Mr. Meilaer told him, he ‘l going on v‘r) luceei,fu!ly in the country. The wiiiiJs .::kcd him to what lie attributed that rapid luccefs lie faid he hid alltilo - his agent to proni;re the t.•ttrs fifteen guine us inilead of the old firm of ten guinea , . Tiie wiinefs allied him how he was g , iotz on in London ? lie Paid he had James Sharp with h rn, and that he ha.l let him have 51. Ir. costkiiience if that, he had nrw given him a fulemn pruni.ie, and he believed he keep his word. The wi•nefs admiro.l that M. tier had brought an :01:on t againil Lim; that he coniideied li.rnivlt as the v*.scovcrer of this aft of briber T, an I that, it it be- ricceirar., he would take all the ad vate.ogr. wii rh .the iaw wcnld give him to tile fh Jul.! be hr thc Plaintiff, as an indemnity again( that anion wl•.; s h had been brought againft hirntelf. On his Crof<•exr. mination, he laid, he did not canfidei the converfa tion that paired between him and Mr. Mettaer as confidential, but that he might communicate it to all the world. The word ficret was never mentioned in the courie of it. The Plaintiff w•as a Gentleman in the Weft India trade, and had been his agent at that election. The cafe, on the paft of the Plaintiff, being finifh. cc!, Mr. DALLAS made a very eloquent fpeech on the part of the Defendant: It was impoffible he could call anf• witneffes, becaufe the converfaitoris fpoken of by ihe witneffes no the other fide, had been repre fented to have taken place between them and Mr. Meltaer alone, and he could not be called.' The Leatned Counfel faid, it was extremely painful to him to make fume of the obfervations he limpid be obliged to make, but he was called upon to do it in the difeharge of a molt important duty, which he owed to his client, and that mull be contidered as.a fullicient apology. Ho made a peat number of tab" fervations on the evidence of Sharp and' Saville, and contended that they flood in fuch a fituation that the Gentlemen of the Jury would not find a verdid upon fuch evidence that would he accompanied with Inch ferious confequences to Mr. Mellaer, who was admitted to be a Gentleman of the fira refpetiability and fot tune. He would be obliged to pay a fine of ; but that was trifling and infitnificant, when. compared to the difabilities that would attach on st. verdia againfl him. He would be difabled from en. j l ing any corporate office, and could never inte for a Member of Parliament. Admitting the evidence of Sharp to be true, he contended, that the 51 was a loan, and sot a gifi to give him his vqte. The prom:fc li.rd been given before he had received any money. Mr. Saville was (Cieftly inierefled in the vetdiCt ; inaftruch as he might ulc it in his own de fence in the attion tli it bad been brought againt himfelf. The Learned &morel next proceeded to Phew the inconlincncy of the evidence of the wit. ncifcs, and concluded a vcrrekquent ipcech with A prong confidence that the Jury would find a verdi& fur the Defendant. ' Mr. ERS IC!S E here contended he was entitled to a reply, by the Defendant producing the record of Mr. .Atkinfon's conviction for perjury. Lord EL LEN BOROOC H thought, at that was a col: lateral itfite, and a, no witnels had been called by the Defendant, the Plaintiff was got entitled to a rea p!y. His Lord(hip, in an excellenf charge to the Jury, laid, there were two queltions for their confi dcratiors. ia. Whether :Tharp had received this SL, on which, confidering the promiffory note that tad come out of the hands of the Defendant, be thought no great doubt could he entertained ? The next queltion was, Whether that ham was given as a loan or a bribe? And after Cumming up the evidence with the greaten accuracy,.he told the jury, accor ding as they were of opinion that it was the one or. the other, they would find a verdid .for the Plaintif or the Defendant. The Jury withdrew about three quarters of an hour, and brought in a Verdi.! for Plaintiff, on the Sr* count of the Declaration, for soot. 7 DIED. On the tlth Int Captain John Parry, late of the dalp Disked Kent, of LiverpooL At KAngtion, Jamaica, the rsth Sept. la*, aged zs, Mr. W Dillingham, of the sstb regiment, fuo of Mr. Biningbarn, rummy Knutsford. At Trinidad, Lieutenant Edward Roger., of the corps of Engineers. Un Friday fc'onight, Mr. Dave.. of the Theatre Royal. Nl*. Lately, uu,board the Baring tale ladiansao, us hi, paw trots Nfadqu, Mr. John iniitheld, late Staff Surgeon to his klajcitylo Forces. On Sondsr night, in Queen fqoare, after a welting and Fib. ful Hinds, Mrs. Drown, wife of Julep► Timms. Brown, Us. d Calcutta. On Maaday Lift, in Solso-fquare. Mrs. Gordon, wife of Jam Gordon, Fig. Oa Tudday Lilt, at his baste, Limetsoufe, John Cruf..llfq. is the 74th year of his age, away years Purveyor of lus Majoitro yard, Woolwich. Lately, at Edenton, in the county of Derby, the Rey. Jams Pe-kr, M. A. Domenic Chaplain to his Grace fhe Duke of Deno- Mono, Rc&r of Kingtiey, is. the county of Stallard, Miniller d E.dcnsuc, and of Caftined, in ILancathife. On the 3d init. at Sheffield, Mr.. MiCready, wife of Mr. M'Cready, Alanagrr of the Birmingham 1 heatre, aad formerly M i i Birch, of Liverpw4. WHEN kondhillty deviate from the poeml fyftun by the feleOlon of a peculiar Broach. the fanetieu of hag couthsuod fume& is dia belt criterion of inperioney. en years have I devoted my peaks to the eichifive treatment of THRIt DISORDERS. and the fueeefsful refult of my plea gives me additional ardour to mink as far as I am able the tu. nets of thole complatumwhilh are the mit Important In thecae,. iclue album= infirmities. _ _ _ Atter initiation into every.. bra's& r u Army Surgeon, formed a wiCh at an catty period PlMtke to educe individuals from the Ignorance of uneducated Meg. or the equally dangermi precipitancy of general Praskitiounrd. The TH Ada DISORDERS. to Aspire ef which I have devote. my 7:340,11, comprise misty (pecks of VENtllitAl. INFEC- • TlO!sr. wheel.r of a recent or long durstion.—sdl , AU kinds of ObbiLllT, whether... Vida; 'from the habits of .' , sr the Indstimacc of niaturesige, gad indly skst.deramgensont of the f y Lieu to Women w kb:hist:AM BARB. UMW sr STU& 1111 T. Numerous illigads are tie rebid or Itionslie or bade in the treatment of a lismk Otsnolvisat, math oat witrequesth Isa!mist eut the feeds MI Me Siiipoifesusi bytife ineferetim of se wegaud ed luau. By a fuperior smallond luck complaints ant map cured. an.i even where others have fai4okl trod pasfanit odor a radical tiettiblubmZni. Few, however, are the calks of cunplicated Mares la Or di& order, compared with the calamitous (madam of Men, who tram indiogence in a titII..ITARY YICB,or the prmaknt Osisdss sr a faibintiable life, acquire that bate of Debility which L dut unavololt conformer of fuck pernicious habits. WI , -rs the unhe.roy Whim broods overhis mblery, but ewe* e•eu-csis his n.inurtune, it pay he fens csafolation fat bins ast iwor, the' although it he an obit* atdosbt qr uncetarty wide utast I . :additions:A, the flalolli of disk DEFICIENCIEd bv, the gradual pc , ,, of renovatko ss the acquirement of my everted ca. If tlle n•e. of Banchils or Venus have begun to reduce manly Id min% mixl ..r t•fry will be primentad by an early cosinteredUcw of this king und titre, sod in lick Mike no great difficulties will occur. But wne•e asst kkticiescy has for years milked, a proper Pa fevzranee is ind::pe Ably rcquifite to revive the Own:ming (parts of Life, and to re-animate the Corfilturlon. MARlUtini WOMEN, who have Wog ken ditappekatel their emus:Wyow u! a Fandiv, uay be dared, that in mod iss Rarer. tut!, d.tr t. ate cueabie by Medical Aid. SCCR st Y "Nei is fo elleatial to my undertaking, and the /Is Ai. a:1 •ni w blett I bone prlfiuntai to (late. form the Bads r., tirttetfi.es, and In coincidence with loch this indmation is :en, that Nlr. BAUR may be itonillted potionarh (or by inters itekfing a (man n'tit) at his bask No. top, Arawlill.arest, "rand, ne.r Temrksitar l'erc Is an billions! amnion la Wrier-!treat adjahibill.s 2 4 the !lan- :• on bolt Oedema. BREE, Mme of the Royal Gage of Sorgooot LONDON Prure.l and publitbed by LEVEL r, (nf Car armory-Owe, Larramb,) at Ow Stan Ott ace, No. t, IL:may giant. Pabl 4Zo at dig ST49. Or►i:a,TMmk Dm• T