Star. — London, England, 1817-11-28 00:00:00

~~~ --- - happen indifTereistly to light upon, and nominate such persons accordingly ; and that be had told the de fendant and his s• licitor that such was his usual prac rice. That the defendant and his solicitor must have misunderstood the e:tpre-sions used by deponent rela tive to the manner in %rich he had been Accustomed to noioinate Special juries, inasmuch as they must have been fully Aware from what he then stated to them, :slid from what actually occurred under their own observation, that he took the names indifferently of such persons upon which his pen - happened to light. That this was accordingly the mode adopted by de ponent on that occasion a mode which had never been objected to on any former occasion within his knowledge. That deponent had frequent occasion to look through many pages of the lists submitted to him, in order to find persons qualified as merchants to serve on such Jury, such lists being the lists of per-' sons qualified to serve on common and special juries; by reasno of which circumstance . he WAS obliged to pass over many pages, not being able to find any person answering the descriptint of merchant th, rem named. That he had great difficulty in fixing upon proper names; but as he cast his eye over every page, he indiscriminately fixed upon such persons as were described to be merchants ; and deponent r osi. tively swore, that in naming the 43 persons which were accordingly named in this manner, he was ac- Wined by no rivate views of his own, but fixed uron them ‘rithrint favour, partiality, or affect.on, and that he nomin iced stash persons as answered the de.scri;ition of persons qualified to serve on special jut ptit AS his pen heipened to light upon Vim, and until the iiiirober of 43 was completed. That it was now nearly five months since the nomination of the Jery in this case had taken place, and depunent did not rectified the fact of first nominating a Mr. Richard Toplin, a vg merchant, and afterwards substituting in his stead the name of another person described as a wme-meschant ; but deponent should rather think, that if he had rejected a person of that name, it was because the person su designated did not fall within the class of persons from amongst whom Special Juries were usually selected ; that de, ponent had not attended (nor was it ever his ha ' su to do) to any statement made by either party re- lating to the respectability pf any,indiv.duat who did come within the class of persons usually nominated upon S, eclat Juries; and that deponent did not know any thing to the private character, respectability, or habits of thinking of any of the persons nominated by him, still less did he know any thing of the respecta bility, character, or habits of thinking of the said Mr. Toplin; and that he never, directly or indirectly, re ceived any coniniunication from the defendant's at. torney elrch couht induct him to pass over the name , of the said Mr Wchard Toplin, and to name any other p.isi:n in his stead. That it certainly did ap. l pear that the name of a Mr. Jahn Warn, described us a wine-merchant, was amongst the IS persons .nanerd, Gut that such name was fixed upon according to the best of deponent's judgment as one fit to be retumed'ou the slid pannel, the person being de scribed as a wine-merchant; but depiinent pn t ively swore that he knew nothing of the said John Means, either rekting to his privatt► charActer or his political principles, lartherlhan as he was described as a mer ehunt in the said lists ; and that he heel merely 6Sc:•d Upon hi. name, As he had upon all the others, be close his pen read lighted up•in that name with the description o: arerchnat attached to it. That . deponeut *did not tt toll. ct rejecting the irime of a Mr. Giiman, Lor did he know any thing at the private connexii ns Cr principles of that ind:v.du.il, and it he had Irjec. Led Lira. Lis t.i.y motive could have been bett4USt tLe said Mr. Gilman was designated in the list as a and consequently not coming within the de- SCriptioll tit a pe:son qualified sn'serve on Special Ju ries as a mrichant. Deponent further positively stated. that he knew nothing, directly or indirectly, of a Mr. Fellowts, who was stated in the affidavits of the de- fendant to be the person who was substituted for the said Mr. Gilman; that his only motive for nom,. Dating the said Mi.Fellowes was, because he answer ed..the eescripon of seavhae, in the said lists, and that he was utterly ignorant of the private connexions or principles of the said Mr. Fe llowes. That to the best of deponetit's knowledge and belief he did nut know anyone of the individuals named on the said pan.• se!. nor did he receive any communication, directly or indirectly, from any person, relating to, or of and concerning any of the persons therein wientionett; and. lastly, deponent saith. that he had nominated :ill the said persons indifferently and impartially, haring fixed upon them because he firmly believed them to be the class of persons from wham Special Juti.s are tsually chosen. Next followed the Affidavits of Mr. Henry Charles _ _ Litchfield, one of the joint Solicitors of the 'Treasury; of Henry De.ltsy, Esq. Clerk 'of the Rules on the Crown side eit the Court . ; of Samuel Collintidge, EA. Secondary of the Sheriffs of the City ot Len doit ; of Henry Marlowe, Esq. Secondary in the Crown Office; and of Thomas Le mane; Esq. Mas ter of the Pleas site of the Court ; all tending to con- Frei the state rimots in the Coroners's Affidavit, re lating to the legitimacy of his proceedings—the prac tice which had obt.ined in his Office as to the mode or striking Special Juries, and as to the impartiality of his COtidiiCt no the present occasion. The At , rotten C;trseam. then addryssed thc Court, ccwtending that aster the affidavits which they had Lend Nad i it was impossible to doubt 'that the three fold imputation of impropriety, illegality, and par tiality, alleged against the Master of the Crown Uffiee, was completely answered, and consequently the role most be discharged. As a preliminary position, be insided, that whatever the cnndoct rf t:)e Mawr might have been, it was quite distinct and se par a te from the question as tel the legality of the trade of returning the lists of persons qualified to serve • as special Jurors, which were submitted to Tint by the Sheriff, who alone Must be accountable fat any Supposed irregolasity in that which ex cinsively belonged to his department. Inasmuch as the Master could only make his selections horn the returns made to him by the Sher;ff, he could not be accountable for the legality or illegali:y of the conduct of the latter, and therefore if soy thing could be objected to that officer, the motion of the defen dant ought to have been framed, so as to bring his 'conduct under the review of the Court. The Court therefore had only to consider whether the Master in bis peculiar province bad acted improperly, illegally, and,partially. For ti'e prrrose of chewing that the Mastertad acted legally on the presert ore ran he! referred to the lSth and 17th Sections of the 3d Geo.' 11. c. 25, which was passed. for the porpose of plac ing the system of Special. Julies upon the same foot- 1 in g as it had theretofore been with respect to trials' At bar ; anti then, for the purpose of 'hewing that it w I the peculiar province of the Master to nominate the Jurors, he referred to second Lilly's-Practical Registry, 155, folio edition, title—Jury and Jurors ; where it Was laid down as a rule of this Omit, of Trinity .Term, 22. Charles 11. upon a motion being made for a Special Jury to try a case at bar, " that the Secondary shall name forty eight freeholders,' and that each party shall strike out twelve," &c.— This appeared also to be the recognized rractice to Trinity Term, S William 111. when it was. laid down as a general rule, that the Secondary is to name the Jurors from the lists submitted to him by the'She rtffs. On the authority of these precedents, therefore, he insisted that the Coroner's duty was to nominate the Jurors fit to appear upon the panne!, and that no other person had a right to interfere with him in the discharge of tin:duty. Lr.rd Es man .nouou—The rule which is to govern his conduct is express. It is.. that he shall nominate the Jurors." The ATTORNEY GENERAL-I submit also, that it is nut only the language tit the rule, but it has been the invariable practice of the Crown Office from the earl e.l times. Lord ELLENnonouctr—The rule says, he shall nn minlte 4b free and lawful men, and that the Sheiitt shall attend hicn for that purpose, nut the officer is not answerable for the ride. if the rule is impro perly drawn up, it is an imputation upon the Court, and not 'Ton the officer. The Arriutraty Ger.:vint conceiving that it would be a waste of time to trouble their Lordships any further upon this point, proceeded to the other parts of the case, and contended that the ailidawts adduced on the part of the prosecution, completely negatived the imputations of impropriety and partiality in the conduct of the officer, finally insisting that this rule must be discharged. Mr. Torvoin said a few words on the same side. Lord ELLCISn3ItOL:GII••••Whd supports this rule ? r Mr. WOOLEn then rose and addresser! the Court. He said he d:d not appear in support of this Rule, with any intention of casting personal reflections upon the character t I the offiar of the Court ; all i tie' he was desirous of doing was, to lay before the Count the circumstances of the case. and leave them to judge whether the fair presumption did not arise that the power vested in him had been partially exer cised: %Vhatever might be said on the one side or the other, either far or against the nficer, ' Could nut remove the necessary g interence which must be drawn, from facts. It was manifest from doe Manner in which the Attorney General had -labourid in abew the legality of the Officer's condtict, that at heist the privilege claimed of nominating Special Jurythen at his tree will and pleasiii e, was at best a doubtful proposition. The Learned Attorney general bad laid considerable stress upon the right of the Master to nominate and select melees:ants, out he (Mr. W.) knew of no custom, however ancient, which cook* h tee the-effect of a written and express law—and con• sequently that could not be assumed as law, upon which the law was silent. So tar as the definition of merchant went, the law was perfectly silent—and , therefore, the hypothesis built upor the defined clout. racier of a Special Juryman was without !Omaha*, , and all the conclusions drawn from thence must tail to the ground. He should cut col.•end against the right art the Master to name the Jurors to form the panuel, nor should he quesflon his impartiality in tke exercise of that poser, unless circumwaoces would clearly lead to a 'opposition to the contrary. But, the real and importaut question in this case was, whe ther the right of nominating Juries should be taken out ut the haads of ,he Sheriff (the people's tifi..:er), and vested in those of a s:tvant of the Crown, wto oloold be at liberty to cod/ and Oirei such *links a. might suit the purposes of his 'superiors, and thereby enable him to become the absolute master of the I:he:ties and the ;wane; of a free people, und e r colour of a legal right of nominat on. He pre owned to think that the definition of Frercluint must not be taken as a mere abstract appellation to be, given only to such persons as should import anti export the commodities in which they dealt, bOt must have reference to the condition—the substance, and the intelligence of persons who were free Citizens of London, and whose claims to serve as Jurors must nave reference to the customs and privileges of the community in which they lived. By the tastes and regulatithis of the Corporation of the City of London in the reigns of He.:ty VII. and lienryVlll. entails Classes of peroans wile defined as eligible to setve on Jures, mut unless the lists from which the Jurors in this c..se wife made out were conformable to those rules and regulations, he apprehended that any other curse adopted, by custom or usage, could not be sancnoned by the Court. Unless the persons described as Merchants were free Citizens and resident inhabid tants of London, they could not be entitled to Sit as Jurors in that jurisdiction ; and if the true definition of a Merchant were advested to,. it would be found that persons trading in London were all Mcreliants ' the French word March a nd bring the origin of that I appellation. This was common sense, and no legal ingenuity could get over an appeal to tie plain un derstanding of mankind. It might, perhaps. be truly said, that by the custom of the City at London, a, Merchant Adventurer need not be a Freetown of the City ; but it these were to hold good in all cases, these was nothing t r prevent a fertiliser from claim ing the privilege of serving as a special Juryman in London. There were ciises, however, deviled' upon this subject. which the Court siould find iii Brownlow's Reports, and in Salkeld, It was quite ridiculous td suppose that the real cha racter of a merchant was attended Co in the selections made of persons to setae on these Juries; for, in the first place, it .was obvious that the title of Esquire was merely fictitious. which every man might assume; and it was notorious that many men assumed the title Of merchants, who had no pretensions to that character.' In the city of London, brokers were known to act as Special Jurymen in the character of . merchants, although, by the bond given by brokers i to the city, they were sworn not to act as merchants. Other persons acted 111 this capacity, who were only traders in Harlequins and Columbiltes. For in-' , stance, it was well known, that a Centlemin named 11.---t sat as .a bletchatit' Juryman at Otaildkall, leiLhottt nny other preters:on than being a pull owner Qf Sadler's Wells Theatre ;.and it was also well known that Mr. Samuel Dixon, a broker, had sat for years as Merchant Juryman in the same place. But without dwelling upon these minute particulars, ' he must insist as a constitutional 4nd legal principle, that a servant of the Crown ought not to be the per. 'on who should chose the tribunal which was to de cide urn the lines and liberties of the people. If the Coroner bad the right to say—" I will do as I like in these matters, because it is my wi:l," there wit an end .to the boasted privileges of Englishmen. What stcurity'had.the public for the faithful discharge of so sacred and important a duty f If the source of justice was impure what woul , l become of its stream Was the shield of English justice to be broken by a Rule of Court—a Rule., too, 'made in the reign of Charles:l. (a reign not ,he most auspi..l us to liberty) and the defenceless people left to the atbitrary as saults of an °Miser of the Court 1 These were con siderations well des.-rving the •serieus attention of their Lordships. The Attorney \ General had said, that the Master of the Crown-office knew nothing of the rag-merchant who had been rejected AS a man too contemptible for the office of a Juryman. Lord Et.t.ENßuteriar-..fke said no such thing : he said malting about eontessitia ! Mr. ‘Vooler resumed. and admitted that that word had not been usA ; but he ridiculed the idea, that a roan's dealitv, iu whatevar al Lae it might be. should operate as a disparagement of his understanding, and a disqualification of his rathatal powers. He had no. thing Mori: to say, than to deprecate the power thus claimed by a servant of the Crown ; for he could only consider this as a case where th'r Minister WAS if )111g his cati.o 1-4 Lis own agen.s. unless the snurcas of justice were kept pure, the boi.ds of society were ; and thi whir,: it Lee:an.e Loidbhips to their country from the impending peril with %%11.i-it it +a es the e 4t.:ned. Toe Judges r!te.n proceeded to give their jiidgmen• :trial/as, xhich they did at COlTSidtT4l:re lerigth—each declaring that there sets not the slightest toundat for the :notion, and finally tesoivitig tt.at the Rule must be discharged. TILE rzwq v H.l. r The defendant in this caw. (.4 pamphlet seller, re siding in the Old Bailey), moved :or a Rule to sinew cause why the Juries Dominated try the issues joined on three informations tiled vgai ,t him, for publishing certain Parodies on the Service of Church of England,. should not be set 'hide, they having seen illegally, unjustly, and partially no iu. nated. He grounded his motion on a joint affidavit, sworn by himself and two persons of the names of Macdonald and Dixon. The affidavit contained three distinct allegations r—firtt, that we Master of the Crown Office had rejected two persons, in forming the Jury, and .übstituted others-2d, that he did not go regularly through the pages of the list of person:. capable ot serving as Jurors, but skipped over several leaves at a time.a.and, SJ, that having, in June last, objected to the Juries then struck, which objection was allowed- by Mr. Litchfield, who waived those , 'Juries, it was necessary to procure a new Rule of Court before fresh Juries were struck. Tisi COURT refused the Role, c , nceiviag the con- Duct of the Master to be perfectly correct. Their Lordships also held, that, at the Rule originally granted fur trying by Special Jury, was not, in ti e first instance, complied with (the act One under it no: being a valid one) it remained in full force I.— ind. there/ there was no neciksity to grant a new R. de, before fresh Juries could be nominated. FAIMIIANSON AND INATSCItY W. W. SONICS, MARSHAL u? Tut KING'. BENCH PRISON. The plaintiffs, who are pisoners for debt in the" King's Benefit, conceiving they had been oppress sivrly treated by Mr. Jones, petitioned their Lind .hips fur relrel---and they came up this day to verily their cumpiaint 117 affidavit. From this it appeared, that on the UM or October, Farquharson dined with Maybury, and a few friends. They separated about eleven at night, and as Farquharson was going home he was violently assaulted by the celebrated Random de Berenger, and some of his associates. A consr derable tiut took place, and, on the following day. the two cciorlatnants, against whom &tenger and others had bniged an information as the authors of the disturbance, were sent by Mr. Junes, withoukthe circumstances being pupal, investigated, to Horse monger-lane gaol, and closely confined for a month. To rebut this case, the affidavits oi Mr. Jones, and of several persons who were present at the fray, were put in. From these it most evidently appeared, that the Complairrants were very much intoxicated on the night in question, and had grossly insulted and abus ed De Bereaser and his friends, who endeavoured to avoid them. The Cella?, convinced that they had created the riot, dismissed their petition. WORSHlP•rmarr.—,Yeste‘dxy Abe Bapkruo, a silk weaver, in Bethnel Green, was charged by .1. Dyall, the Spa fields demagogue, with assaulting him at the Ship, in Brown -street, Bethnal Green. The complainant said, he went into the Ship, when the prisoner accused him of being the cause of Cash man's death, in which be was joined by several others, who beat, kicked, anctilragged - him about, and covered his face with grease and Boot, till he was rendered a most frightful spectacle. The Magis:rate asked the complainant whether be had any witnesses ?—The complainant replied, he lii,d rot, for no person there would speak in his fa vour, they all ridiculed him. The prisoner, its his defence said, that Drill re quested hiin to sign a paper for the purpose of calling a-Mpeting in Moorfields, to petition the Prince Re. vet ; that several thousaads could be Collected in Spitalfie:dis auct something, ander all the circum surreys, would be done tor them—that now was a precious opportunity, and ought not to be permitted to pass ; but that he refesed to sign tLe paper ;—on Dyall went to a Gentleman whsisat in another' bi , x, and m.id: the same proposition ; but he also re. fused to sign his paper, and some persons hadblacked his face out of ridicule. Th e Magistrate said, that with regard to any se. ditioos practices, Dyall was liable to punishment, ; he vial also emptied to the protection of the law. He was now the complainant, and swore to an assault being committed upon him ; and, therefore, unless they could settle the affair, the prisoeer most Bed bail. No information was laid againct . Dya/1•; ar.d the partues cti-ed aid settle() tttc buTir.et‘., MARY'S D REA H. This Sc .h otti e sh c li.ißalladt.gi:,fieacrroit; r i: n ex t t t r z ec r l f f Resders. The the Damfria and Grvirevay Cocrirr " On the fith a May (1817) the writer of , his tell: M'lLeilan, and spent an hour two wfilt c•ee. 1 ii r lbe substance of the eimver.amm, h tuntrl et et, early days. B st e h, i , n : g gei t raf t: t .xi L . : nry s c i c. t , t . 7 l3,l her if she recullec - cii :ht . time . I:en r i „ M qu a a ry tuv i d ii * th it e h perfectly, and repea.ett. in salutattet t intretw.e. , • olttsavecl, that It •t% as • mtewhat altered trent Lon 2nd recital. I ,eked bee it fht 414 Not Wt.!: r••••!, Rev. Tit. N. M`Kle, of Cro..atich..el, had he t ,,,„.,, Suitor of it; Sf*.e it,rantly rcrlike, —e at , arcs) Mr. Lowe alone, computed it: a::d est.! te fit day or two ver the. 4Lct.tto,ta arrival fit Sal!..:V:• e; :t death, who four • broad In 1 , 11/.1,1e :.is • • •ri :• ettinstanct-4, she 0.11.1;Alri, Were ay livis o w , • to her .!•t.a1,.111114 t.tat : etl • •ee to a viv:tai durns a fever, whet thi y : • t Teri r ft. One tam - miss, when they N•fetv et bst:ta at, t:t. Zit death was ammuncesi; the wit. rime:. i.fi%t• 1, L. A ;- go ;cm the gartlett. she me. Mr. LAPOrt: tit! ,ta r did not ,peak; and wLen he got into o w was anus* vita Mias Mary t I hey said she news, and ink& him the elm:mu:mei t. : produced tile bit 2.1. :Soon 4.. rt is tr.'s, to. we. r, at Lel:, N;.o,‘e, and to Mr. C; 1.1 to,••, and npestrif sod stieg it at Lir tt rl:.cee. . • that time, tutus in tit:: family of Mar l , Zte. I :ur!! le r . it Mr. hllLse wa.• poet .hr laid, twattLy Le proof of it, Stay recital the folio. ie:g 1 winch du: heard bun tribe. I bey wels ingsintrJ as aout the aminse of Alartia, eho was also a , • ZtC. 6 Your I.u.t porforia.ther, rup &kat ray% loderd it vtus the bea ; And yet, some of your 6:0.t-liez 4.3 Wdt utvvr tilt frit. • To tc.n , e the frent h:e ie a itangerims timi d ; ; 13•:: where's the ietr, my learned raro, To make a [Wait n nog ?* •• The old taly .• now t v:tig in Manthett.t, otters 'tie, r e .i.l e d upward, ut twenty ve.ri. Nhe tn. the rionAtoni:il wocua II ; Mud, i:llll.Mitt Lp.var4i .f I:.venty years of as., elf,;, No 1.4...e1i5i0n of ier inos:lse• art , : very 'W014411114 Wise, quanneet with her native &trier, and the fantniesot 113: .11.* The firsi e lbard copy of " NlAry'slitea "iti c found in itie7.)rtnfries Weeky Aire:ashes, pub Z ia 2h•lut forty yearn ago—the precise period at ail; the Ballad was wriitess. The only tuatetiil dititain between th.it copy and t!te prtsetst co.otst‘ in line, namely, the second in the sa.c..tol amita t which Mary laid her 0,(/%*11 to erer, and it v..if " But scarcely yet h.ui claitl her ee," occupies the place ul tit .t ovpitstir Ltvr-ler~ ;ice " Her ttoughnt en gaudy tar at sea:" • To trl:cm Mies Maly Ni•Gie test neve& c: me oak tie's were lately dir:oveiel in ct,i, in, the channel of the Calt-Joniali Cold, thi Loch Duchtioir ; they uhre in I.,:vrn e t buried under a depth of ten feet of gravel. f.f juring the dredging mac.i.:e, wil t a ~t ;: ii tons, another off ty scat applied, which succeed in dragging to the siirtce three trees ie Tory 11 size; one of them is of a magnitude .Ito, e; yond the ordinary growth o in the r day ; it is on circumference 2t ii at iae nowt* or the limbs, three in number, and 14 tie: oso 110 at the root end ; one of the hli ar.s is rig!it tic: ri inches in circumference, and the three me, mera; 1911 solid feet ; the wood appears to be pericctn fn, and sound. ). TIM LATX . Mn. HE :NM EItSICIW.-.- Mr. ZitizlN character was truly estimable, and the just oar c tiun of his virtues extended far bertvad t;,e tacit his own family and friends; and it is a wi if suit cleated fact, that a writer (or, as we should say, torney) in a distant part of Scollari.f, rrpr;:rnti ;g an oppressed and needy tacksman, who had apti:all him for advice, the funky of entering into a kw' with a wealthy neighbour, having Initi,e4 of defending his cause, received for dinna ken what ye say, Maister ; there'. nae man in Scotland need to want a friend or kr an while HARItY Ensc.rxr. I.ves ! How mach does that simple sentence convey to the gm. tont benevolent object of it BIR cHe. Teesday, at Lorgparish House, Hants, the Lady cf Hawker, of a daughter. At Stightwell House, the Hon. Mrs. WI, of a dnighter. Intrsday se ' at Muccas Court, lictsfnAbOte , Lady of Colonel of a %till-bans Ajtillt Thursday Woolf*, at Wclls, Stewart Crarao-3. to Capella., youngest daughter of the late viz W A ACc Bart. Monday serindgiat, hi the Seth year of h!s age, rt.:401/re John Hall, Es 4. in Montague-street, John EW.a.!e, Esi.. son of the late Sir James Esdasle, Bart- At Trinidad, West Indies, on the I sth September. of fk e r e ' after only three days ilineas Mrs. Gordon, wi fe of Capt. G-za of the .2I or Queen's Royal Regiment, Deputy Assistse: C••••;:l 'Waver General of the Maud. Nov. 13 at :;:iotts Manse, Henrietta Por:enus, oe - the Rev. Wm Proildfoot minister of Sh..its. Nov. 13, at eVoerdcen, Mr. fames Kathie, tat t Ma-te R Nov. 13, at Edinburgh, the Rey. John Younz, late aanit”t the As-oclate congregation, g,nareardn.c. i t Nov. 14. at Hopes, East Ludaiait, Mr. John Ha',r;e. !Idea ton of James Hay, r.;q. waiter to the s.gron. NAr. Ist, at Arran Lodge, 1;e nor, Elizsbelt,dangt•er: sai heiress of tire late bit John Tyrrell, Bart. of Home, Est Y. 140 J. A, at (Nirrickfergus, of a typhus fever, the Rat Gr lismiltun, tail of Arma;:h. Wednesday st , 'ontlit, were interred in one Eases 3. . WWI three cluidren of Mr. Gillen, of Erist.a, VOO W ore of family had been interred in the sane church yard with': precediaaj fortnight. pllTE.T.iiibibuLs I! ii.l7lkl/AY. fink 3;06, lndia Stock ..... led. 52tHi !mita Bon :., 99 97 93 Ft. • Cons. 83 ...ii 821 83 Fircb. W.:* (lt '.• a 011: 4 per Cent. 99 41s I ---""...---- (4.1 )19 .f: :s••••1 S pet Ct. 109 10Si 1091 1631 Cons. for Act. Mkt; 3 4 6 '!:' I I.g. Anne. 20 1.:-16 21 MAILS, 111:s DAY. • AIM. Dee. Aa, t . e‘ . Dublin • - • .0 1 France -- • C :I Waterford ,• • 0 1 Girtonbl:rsh -- Q j i Guernsey acd lerir7 1 0 Flanders -- - C Lisbon . . - 1 0 Malta --- - '1 Holland • .1. - 0 ft Nrintbur,Th - - EMI I HI•IELD MARKET, NOVEMI'hI I • Bed Ss 04 to 4s 04 Veal 4. C :•• 5 Mutton Ss 6d co 41 64 Park 44 0.1 ro Barran 630—Sheep And I.amhs 3,420 •c• !on—, • HAY AND STRAW PER 1 0 `.r. MI / . 15.5. to Ll. q.—.(ln^•rr s A 4 Bum, LI. 14.. to Xi. o. HIGH wATEAt TO MORROW AT 1.0% 1 0 014 " M Morn* 9 4 1 nlto. fete! Aturanui . ' - LONDON: Primed rind Published by Lewis& Y. Mcs, Tomp:c.usr. :tee trnraTtCdr f : BalladAl I t s R w l ; I . 9 g S i a lin s f ie 'R' e fr d E t A te "lf i This Sc o ttish.r The e 1 46 Readers. the Damfriel and Go4rway Cocrire : " On the nth c , May (1817) the writer of 'his . c•ltel MiLellan, and spent an hour u r two whit t elr. IFri" • 'll Ibe substance of the conver•ation, w h o h turned clieg " ,.. early days. Bring fr .ni tie 'sine r, le t.1.,,,, t i,„,„3 , , • qualms d with the eir, onor.:nces of .• ?e : i other's tams! ''' -. lir'" her it she recuilecnii tin. tinte ,•:e„ s; e N„ t,,., r''. " - I M ary 1, 1 t h e song o f ' Mary's Drean. r he said t•,, perfectly, perfectly, and repea.ed. in sal:static:, t e miletwat. , • obi.rved, that it t% as r. iuewhat altered train :I: • ":,.,. ton and recital. I abed her it At 014 1.0111:.1.1 , •;•.. ~.; Rev. hir. N. NPKie, ut Cro•solich..ei, had he re r„.., audio,' of it; Slte ior antly rrillee, I .e a r; -.4.,11 . . %.1 l ' and Mr. Lowe alone, composed it: a:::1 tio.t te 1;13', day or two ?:rot the. r.e.aties arrived fit' Sat!.;v: : .• death, who had Syne , br0.661 t , ) pil , tle :.is ...ri :.., (. • •••, coins:vices, she con•i;;ur.f, were as 111114.Nt :-•-' e • to Der +Tyler I, ► iltillt t tee I.ret/M.!., t.:at Oh, .rl ...e t . s•,. • ' in a vis;on tharns a 'ever, whets th.y i1.h... ; . 1 y er , ,: . 1 ft. One morning, when they wet,: A* btt.4l. ‘t, ~. tl• .... . • Zit death was announced; the eta, amt.. 4:..t. !, t...L., . go ;cm the gattlee. she inn Mr. Lowe on , t , ,;;,,,. ~.' dud not speak; and when he got into th e . 0. . t., „.;. ' was amiss witls Miss Mary f I hey said elle '..0 : -,c :,. 1 ! al news, and ink: hint the Citettlist4tte, a; and, it : : %,!.,,,,, ' produced tile bat ?al. Snoit at•se is ices, in• we. r e ti ,„ :,• : t.illesii.i.: at Lei:, N;.sose, and to M Ir.CS .1 on% ::t t.., and repeated and smog it at Lir li yl:ce v. No, 1 . • , .:. „,.. il that time, tutor in tit:: family of N,ar t , :v.:. 1 :ur!ier :. k., ' sfi it Mr. frltiLse wa.4 poet ? she said, tatitatn.y he tr..; ~. , pr ocif of it, the recit e d the follue tog s at. 64., Vino. Al heard fun: tribe. !bey war Jimmied as a wit a: . vi• . 0 the runs, of aslertili, elan was Mao a V , : itt.; t: — 0 6 Your lan porforinssocr, my dear ynte% 0 Indeed it was the be.t; 0 And yet, wine of your li:ott - liez lit...i i Wilt never .rand the tee. PI • To t,:a , e the 1:m, frent his i!...1, 01 1; ii a otailgerutts think; ; 0 11•:: where's the ietr, any learned man, To make a Ada, t it stag r so " The old 1a..1y .• :low i v;i1; in Manthesttr, tel.ere oie e e .i.1,4 upward.. ut twenty ve-ri, Dlte ha. the re:tiAroni:.l P WOrtritt ; and, 61111.,tth Wilosafileufsorenty yen/ (Pfau!, die:. (1/ 1 full 1•44.,14011 of her itliejeCD. an Ifei y entyttunimt wise r . d qualms.' with her native &trier, and :tee :antra...sot 111: .6. The firs copy tit 66 Mary's Urea "i.: , . In found in She Davefries Weeky Ai r egaziae, pub 4 e 2 h•lut forty years ago...the precise period at sif , the Ballad was written. The only materi. . l u t - .1 - eses between t!).it ettvy and ''.e present co...ist. in line. namely, the second in the sec.md istmita, which I..try laid her down to eetr, and i i at.: il ofßut scarcely yet had cloit'd her re," a e occupies the iliac.-ut to .t ex'prsite Live./trot :r'c .1 " Her ttutigblit en Tandy tar at sea!" C • To trltcot Min Maty M•Cie was tne , ge& r,:srne oak trels were lately dist . nveiesl ri in • ~, I ing the elianna of the Caledonian Caul, the I Loch Duchfoor ; they were in I,:vrn ic..t Is a er n buried under a dearth of ten teet of gravel. Al ‘..r I juring the dredging m•es.t.:e, will a 1 I . We ~( :: j 1 tons, another of ,F. ty Wilt uppliol, which succet,' in draggeng us tlic ssirtce three trees o' very 11 size ; one of them is of a magnitude .ltne:.i.s yond the ordinary growth o ..; :otl..isd, in the p day ; it is in circumference 20i reel, at ',se itocss . or :be limbs, three in number, and 14 tie: two ilc. at the root end I one of the h li fit..ll is rtg!it trot ri inches in circumference, and the three tste, mei , I' solid feet ; the wood appears to be peritctit a , and sound. ). THIL LATt Mn. HEIM' EftSKlNie.-41'. 7..te mt. character was tautly eininiable, and chains: NIT c lion of his virtues extended tar bevcvad t;,e tittle his own family and friends; and it is a wi it atilt Heated fact, that a writer (or, as we should say, torney) in a distant part of Scotland, Tire:mil an oppressed and needy tacksnimi, whii had appiied him for advice, the Whisty of eiderints, into a laws with a wealthy neighbour, having bialte4 no n.e of defending his cause, received for aioacr—" dinna ken what ye say, Moister ; there" nae a p man in Scotland need to want a friend or kr an :r. while HARRY Et:sr:mit i.ves ! How mach ii:-.: does that simple sentence convey to the gm. rcpt benevolent object of it 1 BIRTHe. Tuesday, at Longparish House, Ikstn., the Lad.y cf 7,!. Hawker, of a daughter. At Brightwell House, the Hon. Mrs. Irby, cf a t!".:10vt. Tlioraday sentlight, at Meccas Court, oe:retools:Arc, Lady of Colonel Sieliwall, of a still-horn coif& MARRIED. T I t; Thursday sennigte, at Wells , Stewart. erze f o'l • 1 v :-.: • to 'Caroline, youngest daughter of the late Sir W. P il..:%Ct. Bart. 1)1E1). 'he h Monday serge, in the 58th year of h!..: age, -' .... oe* John Hall, Es .in Montague-street, John ilmla.!e, Ell. I . . son of the late Sir James Esdade, Ban. '• At Trinidad, West Indies, on the ISth September.* ftk e _ after only three days illn es s Mr s . Gordon, wile of C 3 74 ',''''''.. of the.2d Of Queen's Royal Regiment, Deputy . .lairstan: ,• .... Master General of the I.latd. e ! Nov. Is at :;:iotts Manse, Henrietta Porteous, C. enus, • the Rev. Wm Proadfoot minister of Slsets• g*: Nov. 15, at Aerdcen, Mr. :antes Katie, tact Ma ~..... . Nov. 13, at Edinburgh, th e R e v. ;oho Younz, late mi lt:' the Aroclate congregation, Kureardn.e. . Nov. 14. at Hopes, Esc I:o,lsiaii, Mr. :sir! Ha .. re: Wen son of James Hay, r.;q. writer to the s.gnet. ._, N•ov. Ist, at Arran Lodge, ikgnor, Elizahr , h,dansL''•"' heiress of the late sir John Tyrrell, Bart. of Herna,Ess• Y._ Nor. 8, at thirrickfergns, of a typhus fever, the ILI. a Hamilton, 140 of Arm::::h. wedeutday s-'on'ght, were inter red in one grave. 3. • wmt , _ three ehuidren of Mr. Gill w 0 en), of Bristie, two ore . !7 family had been In terre d i n the tante church yard VII preceding fortnight. PRICE O' SA OCKS YLS'ITRITAY. Bank stock, India Stork .-.. IteE * ll2 iiii • India 1i0n.;., 91197 95 r - Cons. as .fii 82i as EirCti. lilt:' (lt '..• Il 557 7 4 per Cent.o9tittit ii :S ""• J)! 9 : Spec Ct. 100 10 2 lugi 1631 Cons. for A sa‘ 34 c.it cc. , 1 Lg. Anni. 20 15.46 21 Lottery Tieltet•tC 9 11 MAll..f'• THIS DAY. • sag. De a. A tn. C` . Dahlia . . . .0 1 France -- - C m: Waterford .. 0 1 Gerbare: --. t , 1 , Guernsey anti erv7 1 0 Flanders - - , • . Lisbon - - - 1 0 Malta - - Holland - ~. - o s HsmburFS - - L i .........1..:.. SMiIIikIELL) MARKET, NOVEMIIig: l i l Beef as 04 to es 04 i Veal 4. G 1 :.• 5 : 5 Mutton as 6d to 4s 6d t Park es 0.1 ro i . . Beasts 4530.-Sheep and I.amhs 3,45 n —C a lves i no—if. . • HAY AND STRAW PER. 1.0.9% Ifoy, ,its. 1 5 s. to XS. Os.--Clover, e. Clover 4 rE4. to A Straw, .Cl. 14s. so In. ts. _.. ------ -- ja HlGHwxrxit TO MORROW AT LOT 4 iX ) • 5 . re DOD. litte r , Morn* - Atter:rem . . ~ LONDON: Pm . ..fed raid Published by Levet !Sas I Met, TOcop'.c.lStr.