Star. — London, England, 1822-03-11 00:00:00

i - T`l7r , .--•• 1 LINES • - amooso occeows or we Tana *Mum Om Mink WINO SALLMITLY 111111 WM IN 1161111111010 IS Millie 111 41111 NW Or TIM MUM, ISUMMIAII,OII Mai 30111100111 of 11113 So Or nosvos; sr lass comic= RAROX wastar. ......... Whoa Woo die the lath of FM% dad deep Is Glory's loesdrd We ilosiour's proud amigos 1T... disk onus, dud warlike tropldes round it bloom ! But far more giodoss,—nobler far,— Of an who died, as die the braver'. The death that met the gallant Tar, Who sunk beneath tle o'rawkeiming wave ! The wreath that crowns the warrior's bier, Or decks his glory-covered brew, Too oft is sallied by the tear That Conquest's sword has taught is Sow kw. llosOelerenes groan,--senze mina's cry, With ',leery's brightest wreath will twine; Some broken-hearted mourner's sigh Bids Glory's chaplet blush to shine! The buret 4gme allots to him, No modem drops shall ever sheds No widow's moan it's light shalt 41 111 1 r— • No moths?* tear k's bloom shall fade More radiant than the victees crown Shall be the genie that grace his name; Non glorious trophies thin renown Shall still peePetuatt his fame! For where Moording angels Place• _ Ii characters of living keit Those deeds which Mercy loves to trace. That name shad stand for ever bright There it shall shine with rays maxim* Than all the lustre Fame has gi•'4 The warrior's deed ;—it shall endure, . is the unfading page of Haien ! 1824. Feb. LAW IbITELLIGENCZ ' COURT OF CHANCERY, MARCH s. JUDGMENT IN RE HOWARD AND GIBBS, BANKRUPTS. The LORD CHANCELLOR proceeded in this case to say :—" On Thursday I stated that I was. as I still am, of opinion, from the facts of all the circumstances that have occurred to me in this case, that Mr. Car roll cannot be continued as a proper person to be one of the assignees ; and if he cannot be continued, from being illegally elected one of the three of Messrs. Calton, Wilkie, and Duff, neither can the other two, the creditors having voted not merely for the one, bat for all the three, therefore a new choice of assignees must inevitably be made. I now go on to l the question, whether an executor, becoming a bankrupt, can come before the Commissioners ap pointed under his commission as a creditor, prove against himself, and vote in an assignee to his own estate? It seems to me that, if this were the case, nothing could possibly tend to greater mischief; for supposing a person had in his hands property to any amount, say £50,000, and which he puts into some kind of trade, if he chooses to be fraudulent, he has nothing to do but get two persons to be creditors of his,*one to the amount of £lOO to issue out the com mission, and the other would do at £2O; and at the first meeting before the Commissioners he would prove his debt, at the second be chosen an assignee, and at the third, without rendering the slightest in telligence how this f. 50,000 had gone, he would sign his own certificate, and say to the world, or to the parties, - go whe►e you please for your money. Can there be found a greater mischief than this ?' His Lordship then went on to the remaining con sideration, that of costs; and "in my opinion, said his Lordship, " canvassing has been carried on to such a degree in this case, that it requires most seri ous attention, the extent of which I wish to ascertain exactly ; consequently I shall not give my decision on this point till Tuesday nest." ASSIZES. ,MI7I OXFORD, MARCH s. William King was charged on the Coroner's In quisition with the wilful murder of Sarah Foster; and Robert Morgan, William Hartley, and Charles Starch, were charged with being present, aiding and abetting him in the crime. A bill of indictment bad been pre- ferred against the prisoners for the same offence. but the Grand Jury found it against King only for the minor offence of manslaughter, and ignored it as to all the others. As soon as the Jury were sworn, Mr. Cartes, who appeared for Hartley and Morgan, charged as prin cipals in the second degree, rose to state two objec tions, which he conceived must be fatal to the pro ceedings. One of these related to the description of the offence as against the principal in the first degree, for whom he was not concerned, but he apprehended that if there was no sufficient allegation of the legal guilt of the principal, none could be lawfully made against his alders and abettors. This objection was, that neither the length, depth, nor breadth of the mortal wound, of which the deceased was alleged to have died, was specified ; and he submitted that a statement of all these particulars was clearly requi site. In cases of this most serious kind, the law re quired the utmost minuteness of- statement, for the protection of the party accused, that he might know distinctly to what point he must apply his defence. In this point of view, those things which at first seemed only matters of form, became matters of sub stance, the observance of which was essential to the protection of the innocent against vague charges. Mr. Baron GAaaow observed, that in his abstract of the Inquisition, the alleged cause of the death was not a wound, but a bruise. On reference, however, to the Inquisition, it was found to be the former. Mr. Caoss said, that the mistake, and the inference which his Lordship was naturally drawing from the statement as it appeared before him, strongly illus trated the doctrine for which he was contending. It would be absurd to require a statement of the dimen sions of a bruise, but those of a wound might readily be ascertained by persons skilled in surgery. His se cond objection was, if possible, still more decisive. On a reference to the Inquisition, it would appear that the charge against the three principals in the se cond degree, was set forth in the following terms;.-. That Robert Morgan, William Hartley, and Cha r l es Sturch, were felonialy ?rand at the time of the felony and murder aforesaid, is form aforesaid ions= 11 , 10 11rMPRIP"7" 7 " - • --7----7-7--- , • • • • ~..., witted. that is to lay, web. Mb day of July, i* the ISCOOd year of our Lord the now King. at the perish aforesaid, In the county aforesaid ? at midnight of the same day, then and therecosniorting, abetting, and aiding, the said William Kt •to , do and coca-' aro * mit the felony and murder 11 Here it was not stated that the parties faloa• add, but only that they were istomieudyirresces, and then, after a number of intervening words, that they aided and abetted the principal offender. This was clearly in. ___beat, because they might have been feloniously peasant at the time for some other parpese: in a case of this description, nothing could be supplied by in• tendment, and therefore no charge of participation in the murder appeared on the record. Mr. Twtss,who conducted the prosecution, repliii on the objections taken ; but as be appeared, not for vindictive purposes, but to facilitate the attainment of justice, he conceived it his duty to mention ano ther defect, which had occurred to him since the ar- 1 gement: of his Learned Friend, which he felt that I he could not obviate. It was, that in the concluding part of the Inquisition, where the murder ought to be expressly charged by way of inference froth the facts previously stated, the essential words "of malice aforethought" were omitted. Mr. Baron G ARROW decided that all the objections were valid. It was absolutely necessary to state the dimensions of the wound, though it would be other wise if death were occasioned by a contusion. The omission of the word " feloniously' before the charge of aiding and abetting was also fatal ; for the inter vening words.could not be struck out, nor the suc ceeding words, gi the felony and murder aforesaid , " be admitted to explain the meaning of the averment. The parties might have been present with intention to commit some felony of another kind, and one of the party, to gratify a former resentment, might kill one of his associates, in which case all would be felo- niously present, but all would not be murderers. He remembered the case of the celebrated Abershaw, whom he prosecuted when at the bar for shooting at and killing a Police-officer, but who was acquitted, because in the allegation "and of which mortal wound the deceased instantly died," the words " then and them" were omitted. The objection also mentioned by Mr. Twiss was fatal. AU the prisoners were, underhisLordship's direction, immediately acquitted. King was then arraigned on the indictment for manslaughter found against him. Mr. Twin stated the circumstances of the case, and called the witnesses. . It appeared in evidence, that King, with the three others, had been drinking until eleven at night on the 26th of July last, at the Crown Inn, at Ban bury. After they left this place they went to the house of the deceased, which is situate in the yard of the inn, and loudly demanded admittance,whict was refused them. After they had retired to a little dis tance, Sarah Foster, who was in bed with her sister, opened the window, and violently abused King for the disturbance. She repeated her abusive language till he threw a stone, which struck her on the side of the head, and made her IA senseless. She languished, almost always in a state of insensibility, till the Bth of August, when she died. On examination it was discovered that the stone had fractured a small vessel embedded in a channel in the skull, and produced an effusion of three ounces of blood, which occasioned death. A deposition of the deceased had been taken during an interval of sense, by a I%l.igistnite, but it could not be received in evidence as an examination taken under the statute, because it was not given in the presence of the prisoner; nor as a dying declara tion, because it did not appear that the deceaied was at the time conscious that she could not recover. The prisoner received an excellent character for general humanity and peaceableness of demeanour. Mr. Baron GA RROW charged the Jury, that there was no pretence for charging King with murder, or the other prisoners with any crime at all. But be' thought there would be little doubt that the charge of manslaughter was supported by the testimony of the witnesses. The Jury found King Guilty of Manslaughter, and the Learned Judge, taking into consideration the length of imprisonment which he had already endured, sentenced him to six weeks' imprisonment. HERTFORD, MARCH 9.-CROWN SIDE. The business on this side finished on Saturday morning about eleven o'clock. Five capital convicts received sentence of death, viz. James Wilkes, Sc;,,. Phipps, James Taylor, forburglary; Benjamin Parker, fer highway robbery ; and James Pointon, for horse stealing. Of these, none were left for execution. The only remarkable case was that of Samuel Phipps, a bargeman, who was indicted for burglariously breaking and entering the dwelling house of Thomas Poole, in the parish of Sawbridge worth, and stealing therefrom a silver pint mug and two silver salt-tellers. The prisoner bad been in dicted with another man, named Johu Fordham, but as to the latter the Grand Jury ignored the bill. It appeared from the evidence, that in the night time the prosecutor was disturbed in his sleep, by the noise of some persons apparently pulling down his house. He got up, looked out of his window, and saw three Main the act of pulling down the boarded gable of his dwelling. He demanded what they wanted ? One of them replied that they wanted money. He told them that they should have money, if they desisted from pulling down his house. Re turning to the window, he threw out a pocket-book, containing three £1 notes, having previously taken the precaution of abstracting from it a £lO note. —The man picked up the book, examined it, and said that would not do ; he must have the 1:10 which he said he knew he had : and before the prosecutor could comply with his wishes, he was assailed with a shower of large stones, whi c h broke the windows, and most probably would have brokeohis, own head, if he had not retired in time. The prosecutor begged the villains to desist, and then threw out the £lO note. In the meantime the other men effected a breach in the house, and then the three entered, seized the pro secutor, and secured him in his daughter's bed-room, whilst they ransacked the house. They found a boz under the daughter's bed, from which they took some articles of plate, and then decamped. The case to af ' feet the prisoner on trial depended upon a variety of minute circumstances. It was proved, that on the following day be went,to London by a coach, and re deemed some clothes from pawn, tendering a £lO Bank of England note, receiving the change from the pawnbroker, and then returned to the country. This note was identified by the prosecutor and the. pawn. '7 72 7:11. • • - • . • • , • 1 • 4t bicker, who had paid k away. lise history dale got was &raged firetrdsandl it erne hits the bands o the presselutoe, and **awards until it was adduce in evidence against the prisoner. • • The prisoner had•glven contradictoi7 accounts o the attar in which the said settee:se into his pos sonieat int, that be found it ; then, that he bad re- Coked it from a Mend, tic.—The case went to the Jury, who found the prisoner Gaily—Death. CIVIL lIIDEr-lIIIILLIERAND O. KNOLL/So _ This case, which was an action for a trespass assil assault, came en to be tried in the Town Han of Hertford, on Friday. last, before Mr. Baran GRANAU and a Special Jury The Court was crowded to excess. Mr. CHARLES PHILLIPS (who was specially re tained) stated, at considerable length, the case. The plaintiff in this action was a respectable farmer, re• siding near St. Alban's, where be farmed a consider able property. The defendant was a Gentleman re siding at Uxbridge, in which place he filled a very considerable station: he was- a person living in a handsome style, and possessed of a large income.— The Jury must recollect how very unfavourable the last season was to the harvest, and consequently, how late it was collected. About St. Alban's it was parti cularly injured, and the Gentlemen residing in the neighbourhood came to a resolution, that they would neither sport themselves, nor suffer any stranger to sport, until the 14th of September. This compact was very universally entered into, and it was, at least by the parties making it, as universally respected. On the 3d of that month, however, when the plaintiff was busy in his fields, he was surprised by the ap pearance of the defendant and two other sportsmen, with guns and dogs, in the pursuit of game. He thought it his duty.to apprise them of the compact of the County Gentlemen, and pointed out to Mr. Budd, one of the defendant's companions, a field of French wheat, in which the crop was still standing, into which he particularly prohibited them from going.— Mr. Budd pledged himself that they would not, and he afterwards communicated both the prohibition and the promise to Mr. Knollys, the defendant. The Learned Counsel proceeded to state, that the plaintiff having left the field and gone home, the defendant took advantage of his absence to break his promise, and that the plaintiff having returned to the ground and attempted to seize the defendant's gun, the latter struck him with it repeatedly on the arms and legs, and finally knocked him down. It appeared in evidence that this was a very yin-, lent assault, and that the plaintiff was a respectable man, and a Minister of the Gospel, being a preacher belonging to the sect called Independents. Mr. AINAPHUS, on the part of the defendant, re• plied, but called no witnesses. The JUDGE summed up the evidence, in the course of which he complimented the Counsel on both sides, on the eloquence and ability which they had displayed for their respective clients. The Jury retired, and in about half an hour they returned into Court, when the Foreman addressed the Judge—" My L ord, lam desired by the Jury to say, that the reason we do not give heavier damages than we do is, because the plaintiff was so indiscreet as to seize the defendant's gun, when he had no right to do so. We find for the plaintiff—Damages £2OO and costs."—The trial occupied the whole of the day. NORWICH, MARCH 7. The following prisoners, con.mitted for breaches of the peace, were this day put upon their trials, viz. Robert Chatton, Simon Crick, Henry Caky, James Caky, James Goddard, and John Andrews, and in- dicted for riotously assembling at Shimpling.. All the defendants pleaded guilty, with the exception of Robert Chatton. James Sparham, a farmer at Burston, deposed that, on the 13th of February, he sent his servant for a machine. That he went out, and as he returned home met a body of men to the number of fifty. He in- quired of them for what purpose they were met? and they said, to prevent the threshing-machines—to destroy them. He remonstrated with them, repre senting to them that they would find the law too strong, and that it would be in vain for them to resist the authority of the laws. They were all or chiefly Shimpling men. They all said they were determined to break the machines, let the consequence be what it would. He left them, and rode to the Parish of Burston, where he met the machine. Before the machine reached the Parish of Shimpling, he again rode forward, and expostulated with the men.— They still appeared determined to break the machine. Chatton appeared violent and louder than the rest. After he found they would not disperse, he directed the men to come on with the machine. As soon as it was past the boundary of the two parishes, and came into the parish of Shimpling, the rioters seized the horses.' Chatton and Crick first. They took off the fore horse. Witness then got off his riding mare, and took hold of the wheel-hone in the shafts of the ma chine, to lead it forward. Chatton immediately laid hold of the horse, and said, « No, no, my lads, take the horse out." The horse was consequently taken out by force, and they immediately began to break the machine. They broke it with a variety of tools, hatchets, pickaxes, hooks, and large cudgels or clubs. They totally destroyed the machine ; so much so, that in his opinion it was impossible to repair it. It must be completely new. Witness wrote down in his me morandum book the names of those he considered as ringleaders. He left them in a very few minutes, and rode to Mr. Lee's, of Dickleburgh. He left them breaking the machine. He was present about ten minutes. Chatton appeared particularly active. The CHAILIUMI said, "and appears from the evidence to have been a ringleader." Witness.—Decidedly so. in my estimation. Caarassan.—They offered no personal violence? ' Witness.--Not any. The defendant Cbauon asked what reason witness had to think be was active? Witness.—Breause, from my own observation, you spoke more, mode more noise, and were more forward than any others. Lard Borerma.—l think you said that defendant Chatton was mom forward, and that he said he was determined to break the maim ?—Witness.--Yes, certainly. Cnatareark—Are you gaits sure it was Citation who caught bold of the been? WitorQuite were , hetet= he put his hand very war Woe on the bridle, and pushed the bons back when I wanted to lead him forward. William Dixon, farmer, Shimpling with Mr. Sparham ._ when he got out of the boundary a number of men assembled thirty or forty. As soon as ... Parish of Shimpling, the people 7 •' , 77lrti , " 7 . 7 14.61 1 P. • • la* MaiMaistalegia " eielittspie ceb Witness did Wit romain them anther disposed. Wit. tress was with 11r: Sparharn whey the machine ar. !Wed at theboundary of Shinspling, hut did not hea t ettything till they were going to nthe the horses out, when they said they would take them out and break t h e machine to pieces. Saw Chatton take hold of th e shaft horse. Witness could not say who first took bold of' the horses. Did not distinctly hear who took bold of the horses first. They had hatchets, pick-axes, harrec e l n ubs, and so on. dant denied breaking the machine, but ad mitted that he was present. Several witnesses spoke to the good character of the prisoner. Ciailty—but recommended to mercy on account of his age. The prosecutor, Mr. Sparham, recommended IL Caley, J. Andrews, J. Caley, and S. Crick to mercy, an account of their good character. Thomas Taylor, IVilliala Baker, James Goodiags f 'and Robert were severally tried and twnd guilty of the same offence, committed in the parish (I Wymondham. These prisoners, together with tl e preceding ones, were then placed at the bar, and tte 'CHAIRMAN pronounced sentence upon them in a very impressive and admonitory manner. The sentence of the Court, be said, looking to the extent of the crime, was one of lenity and mercy, and it was to be hoped that this mild administration of justice would induce them to quit such a course of life for one of sober, quiet, and honest industry, kr the rest of their lives. The sentence of the Court wa , ,, that Robert Chattun pay a fine of £5 to the ibe imprisoned for twelve months, and at the end that period to find security to keep the peace for tTo years, himself in £lOO, and two sureties of £5O eacl.. James Goddard, one year's imprisonment, arid to enter into a recognizance of £lOO, to keep the u.eace for two years. S. Crick, six months imi:ris•.oment, and to enter into recognizances to keep the peace for twelve month's. H. Caley and J. Andrews to he im prisoned in Aylshatu Bridewell for three nirrnths James Coley; one month's imprisonment in the Castle. W. Baker and J. Goodings, six months i:nin.:son ment, and to enter into recognizances to Lep the peace for twelve calendar months, in £5O ea,ll. Thomas Taylor to be imprisoned three mon:lis iii Swaffham Bridewell ; and Itobat Smith oile vicek in the Castle. CITY BUSINZSS.—A Special Court of Aldermen was held at Guildhall on Saturday last, which WAS very fully attended. The Chamberlain attending re• ported to the Court the surplus in hand of the Or. phans'.Fund applicable to the discharge of the debt, which being read, the Court directed the sum of £23,200, part of the debt, to be paid off and dis charged ; and instructed the Chamberlain to inform the parties interested therein accordingly. Commis sioners of the Court of Requests for the month of April next were appointed. The Chamberlain laid before the Court sundry Orders he had been served with from the Select Committee of the House of Commons upon the Orphans' Fund, fix various Ac counts, which were read, and the Chamberlain di rected to make the Returns required. RCCLESIASTICAI. PROMOTIONS. The Rev. James Dacon, to the Curacy of Sr. F.:ht.Wrek', Norwich. Tne 26th ult. the Rev. Wm. Yeadon, 11. D. %V.sS : d to the Rectory of Waddington,in the county of linco:n.-1' on., the Rector and Fellows of Lincoln Coll. ge :hi'. rd. The Rev. Henry Bristowe M.A. of Chri.t • has been instituted to . the Vicarage of lieckington, LincoLzl.n-e, on his own petition. The Rev. John Jones, Curate of Waterbeach, has been pre sented, by the Bishop of Worcester, to the Living of CratilLy, in Wuretsterahire. The Rev. John Hughes, of Oswestry, to the Curacy of LA. nymynecb, void by the death of the Rev. F.. Junes. The Rev. Mr. Farnan, late of Galway, is appointed Rater of Utica, let America. BIRTHS. March 4, in Sidmouth.atreet, Mack] ___ _ . of the Rev. J. W. Vivian, of a daughter. Jan 22, at Lurgan, county of Armagh, the Lady of Li-u:.- Col. Mac Neil, 2d Life Guards, of a son, still-barn. Jan. 211, at Malta, the Lady of Major W. P. De Bathe, s:th Regiment, of a daughter. >, the Lady MARRIED. At Leamington, the Rev. Edward Woodyatt, IL A. to Louisa Georgiana MAria, youngest daughter of the late Mr Nigel Bow yer Gresley, Bart. of Drakelow. Thursday, at Harwich, John Cooke, Esq. Lieut. R.N. to Catharine Pulliam, second daughter of Edward James Fencing, Esq. Comptroller of his Majesty's Customs at Harwich. DIED. On the 6th instant, at Dumfries, the Rev. James Kirkpatrick, aged 77. Sunday sennight, at Shrewsbury, the Rev. Benjamin Ed wards Rector of Frodesky, Salop. Feb. 15, at Redford, in the parish of Madderty, aged 611, the Rev. James Andrew. Lately, at Lynn, the Rev. John Dean, many years a travel ling preacher in the Methodist connection, and formerly of Row. ton, in Cheshire. Jan. 23, at Taira, John Barclay, of Moor-farm, Esq. late She riff-Substitute of Ross and Cromarty, aged 84. Tuesday, at Crowsley Park, in the county of Oxford, John Atlyns Wright, Esq. Chairman of the Quarter Sessions for that County, and Recorder of the Corporation of Henley-on-Thames, aged 64 years. Feb. 20, at the Manse of Crail, Catherine Beatson Bell, youngest daughter of the Rev. Andrew Bell, of Kilduncan. Thursday se'nnight, at the Cork Fever Hospital, aged Jackson-Walsh de la Cour, Esq. Apothecary and Surgeon to tin.; Institution during a period of twenty years. March 7, in South Audley.street, aged 19 months, Augusta, daughter of W. L Hughes, Esq. M.P. October 12, off Sierra L eone, Lieut. James Still, of his dls jesty's ship Pheasant. Tuesday, in Chelmsford, Elizabeth Ann, eldest daughter ef the Rev. William Williams, late Vicar of All Saints and St. Peter's, Maldon. Tuesday, at Richmond-hill, Surrey, Jane Theresa Delafosee, aged 65, relict of the Rev. Robert Mark Delafosse, LL R The 20th ult. at Magharafelt, James and Anne Badger, at dto advanced age of 70. These two persons were born on the onto day ; baptized at the same time ; married to each other ; twit ill and died together; and were buried in the same grave. Nov. 10, at Upper Camp, Jamaica, Major William Mauna, 50th Regiment. About a fortnight since two young females were interred on the same day, at the village of Syth, near Whitby, whose deaths took place under the following melancholy circumstances:— Three young girls, sisters, the eldest about fourteen year. of age, having taken a ramble into the woods near lllulgrave Cast*, their attention was attracted by some red berries, growing on a shrub, supposed to be the deadly nightshade, of which they were induced to eat. Two of the number di ed in a day or two afterwards, and the ether was so ill in consequence, that her re covery was a long time extremely doubtful. Naas LONDON 111111Dat T 04102 ItoW • . IS minute@ after 52 --- S les . lused sad published by Loss. ILss7, Pickett, Maur, Temple-Bar. ^" 6 s t ~~ •.i' • •zior • 45t..1".-r7, Pi it. I: . . • 1-.‘t :~ NUMBER 10 THEATRE Under the T°MORRO% .bitreb 13, Pa Ti- Inwhich the netts. I rae! in Egypt, Put 11. The First Panl 1. AG )trs. S ALUM, Mu Mrs. Brun .» Mr. 8EL1.A741 Signor De Sums, Mr. NELson, Mr. at Burston,_ walked to wverf Ira. a lei in on the 18th February; Hthill-W ATI mdary of Banton. hoopoe Mcmina ° W iller ! emeels b e lo 4 D i p. the M achine d~ oo tt gosecor r :pit took the Pion fres . • Sir GEORGE S It is reepect the nurnernue reque! b e perp,rmed the w MESSIAH, with being ;Le only time present Season. OUT of Nini BISH sold nu az Capitals to than How many of then time will determirn Tneasont, when Money, and many BISII is selling u 4, Cornhill, and 9, in the Country. FOUR PRIZ 3 Prizes of 4 And the I SWIM' and Co coed Day's Drawir Established Offices, 31, ALIX:ATE lIICH Noie.—There ari and Not Two Plan And r( and J. SIN' • and the Five Thnusa::(l kiwin Cai i:::l4 rcn NEXT 1 When t! TWF.NT 4 ... of ... 3 Tickets and Shar muslin' Old and HOLBORN; and day Sold In shell 1, No. 4 18,051 a the Last Day of the Tickeu and Country. PEARL NEI Tiara-, U. Lockets, Bronchi s, BA RLO W, No. worker and String for Ready Money. SEVE . R A I, CC Sacco Cases, from Ladies' •aluable exented for Fipo TO PI VIT HERE A Persons Celt, bein- copies tanning th r h GE` I MARTI N, therul their Customers a REWARD of T each information of these illegal pro Feb. 1822. CU NEW DUTt 1 14 CHAR/ZS Bore toots, a new a rrHE BRIT 1 GUIDE; c and Ezei.:- Laws Trade of Great El Bounties, rremiu to the present pet Treasury Minntel useful Informatic This Work, nc and principal Del Dir. Boyd, at the petite the Royal hoard;) ,e 1 10. In 12tuo. c triiE COO 1 for Plain C sate Families ; a most highly fin Sauces, and Flan is accurately stat stsult of actual sician. The Fey dred and Thin) dings, and an ea! Pickles, by whit loud s onatina r i at -- ifnor Yg Th l l fare ß .6 Cce by the former P Panted for Thirst, Robinsoi " For Fach ctiletly the Coot sections, there i Of the litcratur seen."—Suppl. t " We veitiure sitlerrd as the for its author t burgh Review, "'This is the i tea from the re; cf liousckeeper sometimes cons will escape a nt will tiot, must • t heir turzu.^.c."-