Star. — London, England, 1821-02-23 00:00:00

n on his Majesty and his Ministers—(Cheers). In fi n , a trial was made of the disposition'of the p eo ple to support Minister!. In Dublin, there was bt d e , petty irnperium in imperio, a petty cabinet , a s oodescr ipt body, sometimes riding over the Govern out, who did infinite mischief. They wanted a bale adulation for Ministers. Now, he would say, d i stil the discontents of Ireland Originated in local or g s; to bis Majesty they were most loyal and at otbeti. If his Majesty should visit Iceland, as it o s said he intended, he would be received with a pi dial ent:iusiasm, characteristic of that gallailt, • fi e, and generous People 7 -(Cheers). If, however, b e might propose an amendment to the proposed in m at i o n, without exposing himself to the consc iences of an amendment at Kilmainham, he would pole that his Majesty, when half seas over, should Throw his Ministers overboard !—(Shouts of laughter i no b o th sides of the House). If anything could s en wace his Majesty's visit, it would be some sum terry process of that kind against -his Ministers— (ears). But he did* most seriously consider it of t h e u tmost importance that the Sovereign should b iu sw the miseries and the virtues of Ireland—. p eers ). He had no doubt that the Cabinet Minis mswould join the Right Honourable Gentleman in f iring all the benefits of the British Constitutionito Wand; but if that was their intention, this was the b est o pportunity to prove the sincerity of their dispo sition, by granting a Committee to inquire into such an outrage—(Near). He thought it right to men tion that the Sheriff, who had formerly been called to the Bar, had been soon afterwards rewarded with a ver y valuable office—(llenr, hoar). -This instance might base been present to the mind of another She rif, who might have con•idered such conduct not only spirited and loyal, but profitable—(Loud cheers). Mr. ELLIS (one of the Members for Dublin) said, though he had no acquaintance with the Sheriff, yet, as a letter had been addressed to him by that Officer,. be felt it his duty to state the facts. lie had been sz the Meeting, and he must say, that some of the staternenti, in the Petition were unfounded, and all overcharged. What took place before the Meet ing, had been kept out of view ; and he was confident the facts were unknown to the Noble Lord (Russell), and might have been partly the cause of the selection tithe Noble Lord, whose name was inseparably asso ciated in the minds of Englishmen with the cause of Fremlom. A preparatory Meeting had been held, and the population of the Town was, in consequence, added to that of the County. He had seen placards of the most inflammatory nature on the walls. He bad heard the question put by the Sheriff, and though he had not heard the question put negatively; hehad been assured by Coe Sheriff himself, and the Noble. Se conder, that it had been put negatively. 'Though be should not have acted in the way the Sheriff had done, it did not follow that, in a situation of extreme diffi culty, that Officer had acted wrong. But was. the ?beriff, for a mere error of judgment, to be dragged iefire the House, without die imputation or a cor net motive? Was not the question of the motive equally important in that House as in a Court of Law? Till it could be proved that there was no other mode of redress—(Hear, hear! from the Opposition)—the notion ought to be negatived. When the Assembly Was ordered to disperse, the order was disobeyed; and he then called loudly for the Police, who, from whatever cause, did not obey the call. The military were then called, and the Nobleman in the Chair was civilly, and without violence, handed out of it— Pughter).-- The question was, whether the interfe rence of the military was necessary? and, if necessary, ere Sheriff was justifiable, even in the event of his opi ;:on being erroneous, while the motive-was not corrupt. . J. NEWPORT said, all that was wished for, sus a fair and impartial inquiry into all the circimi s!ances of the case. The late outrage, of a similar kind, had been brought before the Parliament of Ire land, at the time of its dissolution ; and it would be a grievous case for Ireland, if the first case of the same kind should be passed over by the Imperial Par- 1 liament. If there was a case in which the military should not interfere, it was one like the present. If the Sheriff was to be allowed to call in the military, the right to petition was a mere nullity. Did any English Sheriff attempt to introduce the military?— The Meeting here was in a room; and a Magistrate had been placed in the Chair. The Sheriff conse quently had no power to disperse them till lie had read the Riot Act. A question, involving the dearest rights of the subject, was not to be turned over to a Court of Justice. He could not believe that the Im perial Parliament would be guilty of such a derelic tion of its duty. Mr. 1). BROWN stated, that the conduct of the Sheriff alluded to, at the time of the Union, had been inquired into in a Court of Law. _ _ __. • Sir J. SEBRIGHT lad voted for the Bills to pre -vent Seditious Meetings, as the transactions at Man chester had been made use of for the worst of pur poses. It was the bounden duty of the House, however, in this case, to appoint a Committee; and .he hoped Ministers would throw no obstacle in the way of inquiry, as such inquiry would alone justify him, and the majority of the House who had voted for the Bills that were to narrow the right of petitioning. Mr. BATHURST stated, that the late Act did not extend to Ireland, and the rase then was the same as if the Act had never passed. If the Sheriff had acted wrong, he was amenable to a Court of Law, and a prosecution then would be a sufficient punishment, and prevent the repetition of such conduct. The case could only be sifted to the bottom in a Court that had the power of examining witnesses upon oath. In the ease of the High Sheriff of the king's County, the Parliament of Ireland came to the resolution that his coadnet had been highly meritorious, and calculated to preserve the public peace. It had been stated that kgal proceedings had already commenced, and should the Sheriff be brought also before that House, he might be acquitted by the one Tribunal and con. deruned by the other. The chief grievance of the case was the introduction of the military, and for that 4 Court of Law afforded an adequate remedy. M. M. litrzoenato and Mr. BATH intsr explained. Mr. J. P. GRANT observed, that the result in this cise might be the same as in that of the Sheriff who had been called to the Bar of the Irish Parliament. B ut t h e protection of petitioning was not to be left to :e ordhipary Courts of Law. The case was made 6 ut. against the Sheriff, e v e n u p on th e s t a t e ment o f sight Hon. Gentleman sopposite. It was more thii- sight matter of mere iniiscretion, to put down by l'Jrct a Meeting )esally convened. Lt . the awn:mine , used on the present occasion had any weight, they would take away the whole of the inquisitorial power of the House of Commotii. "Mr. MARTIN, of Galway, considered the present subject not only as not desirable for the Consideila tion of a Committee ; but it ought not to occupy the attention of the House. A legal remedy could be obtained for the injury, and that - too without the in terference or the order of the House. If the parties injured were unable from poverty to obtain redress, the House might order legal proceedings ; but the Noble Chairman of 'the Meeting (Lord Cloncurry) , was not only asue of the Millionaires of the County, but . was supported by his Lawyers, Mr. O'Byrne and Mr. O'Connor--(A laugh). He thought, besides, that the House ought not to prejudge the proceedings, for it could not be doubted that the opinion of the House would have a strong tendency to prejudge the accused: indeed it would be like a Barbarian throw ing his sword into the scale, and he hoped the House would not exercise its sword in this manner—(Laugh ter). With respect to the observation of the Right Hon. Qentleman opposite upon his Majesty's Minis ters, he (Mr. Martin) thought that if the sense of the County represented by that Honourable Member were taken, it would be seen that that County thought, as he himself thought, that it was impossible to find any Administration that deserved better of the coun try than his Majesty's present Ministers—(A laugh). Mr. PEEL should feel it his duty to vote against the motion of the Noble Lord ; but not from an ap probation of the conduct of the Sheriff. He had been accused of proposing strong measures to the House in the case of Ireland, and his object had been to do away with the necessity of the constant em .ployment of the military. The conduct of Govern ment, in refusing to censure the Sheriff, or to institute a local inquiry, he. wholly approved ;.as nothing was more to be deprecated than the interference, of the Government with Public Officers: . Upon the same principle that he approved of the conduct of Go vernment, he must approve of an appeal to the Courts of Law. The more illegal had been the conduct of the sheriff, the more tit was it to be brought under the review of a Court of Law. He never would believe that the Grand Juries of Ireland would refuse to do justice under the sanction of an each ; and therefore the law was open to the parties. . Mr. C. GRANT explained, • Sir JAMES MACKINTOSH said, that this ques. tion was qne of the utmost consequence to ,the Con ,stitution and liberties of England. It was a ques tion as to the conduct of a Public Offrcer 'who bad interrupted the sacred right of petitioning by mili tary force, a thing .which our ancestors thought a sufficient:reason . for getting rid of a-Monarch, and changing the right. of succession to the, erciwri.:-. {Hear; keel.- He conten&d that the rrisli_Govern mem shcadd have ternoyed 'the-Sheriff -Of Dublin. The Government of this country had no scruples of delicacy when they removecl -one of the most vir tuous of men, and : respectable. of_ Noblemen that ever lived—Wear, irear).grslns his Lieutenancy of County, because he supported the right of public dis cussion and of petition in a case which did not please his Majesty's Government—(Hear, hair). That dis mission from cffice of this most kcellent Nobleman was first made known to him through one of the Go vernment Journals. He blamed the Sheriff of Dub lin for not having put the amendment audibly; and yet it appeared that he who whispered menaces, and drawled out amendments, could roar out, in a voice that resounded through the Hall, for Police-men. But was there nothing in the threat of military exe cution, and in the dispersion of the Meeting by mili tary force? There was no remedy in the Common Law, or Statute Law, that he knew of, and therefore they, the Grand Inquest of the Nation, ought to in stitute an inquiry into the whole of the proceedings; for the doctrine that the House of Commons should not interfere in matters of this kind would lead to the commission of all sorts of political crimes. An inquiry into such gross violations of political rights could only be made by a Committee of the House of Commons. Mr. SHAW (of Dublin) was one of the persons present at this Meeting. The Sheriff used a . very in discreet conduct at that Meeting; and, if no reJress could be attained at law, be would vote for this mo. tion ; but it was well understood in Ireland that the Courts of Law were open, and that proceedings would be instituted at law. Lord CASTLEIMAGH was not at all surprised, at the speech of the Hcinourable and Learned Gentle man opposite (Sir James Mackintosh), because it was so perfectly consistent with the course which that Honourable Gentleman had taken • and taken with perfect absence of success, on the Manchester ques tion. The case of the Noble Earl (Fitzwilliam), to ' which the Honourable and Learned Gentleman had also alluded upon a former occasion, was not exactly is point ; because a Lord Lieutenant was necessarily a confidential Officer, a Sheriff not being quite so, in quiry' like connected with Government, For an like that now demanded, there was but one precedent in the Parliamentary history of England; and that was a case occurring not in the best of times, for it occurred in the reign of Charles 11. A proceeding in the Irish House of Commons had been attempted to be set up as a precedent; but, first; he (Lord Castle. rea ,, h) denied that the House was at all bound by 'suet a precedent; and, next, he maintained that the circumstances of the ease in Ireland were essentially different from those of the case before the House. The question was, could the matter be better investi gated in the House of Commons than in a Court of Law ? He denied that it could be so ; and if there was any inquiry in the House, it must be an inquiry acthe bar; because a Committee up stairs could not go into matters affecting the character, and even the , personal liberty, of the Sheriff. If the House under took„ to investigate and arrange all the disputes which' took place at Public Meetings, it woild cut out for itself such a copious supply of work as must preclude its attention to all matters of importance, He there, fore hoped the House would come to the same con clusion it came to on the Manchester question, namely, to leave it to the Courts of Law, and net allow them to make it a subject of constant declamation. Sir J. NEWPORT, Lord CASTLERP.Grip a4d Mr. M. FITZO ERA to, Mutually explained. E. r) BECTIVE denied that anything was given to any person of the County' of Meath to sign an Ad dress to his Majesty; • In this opigion, - the conduct of the Iligh'Shctiff - Of Dublin was proper and correct. Mr. ciMENI.Y.-Ilie Noble Lord b4d . 4llidOd to what he (Mr. Creevey) had said upon a former occa sion; tespecting the 61;4,0:petition, and had repre sented it as som ethi ng very novel and extravagant. Now, he was of opinton that the Noble Lord did not know the period to which ate had alluded : it was to the year 1680, when the right of petition was fir* form'allyestablished. Ne had never expected that. he should have, had to stand up in defence of that tight, (which a Russell and a Cavendish had vindicated against such a Wretch as Jeffreys. It was because that right had been violated and destroyed sir years afterwards, that the Second James had been driven from the Throne; and he trusted that, even in the, present day, it' the Meetings of the People to petition were disturbed by military violence, they would have the virtue and the spirit to do themselves that justice which they had done themselves before, under the auspices of a Russell and a Cavendish—(Hear). Mr. W.WYNN thought there was sufficient ground in this case for an information in the Court of King's Bench ; because the Bills of 1819, had no controul over such 4 Meeting as this was. The House could only commit the Sheriff for a high breach of the pri vilege of Parliament, in preventing the petitioning of the House of Commons, if he had done so. _ _ Lord JOHN IWS§ELL had always heard the Honourable Gentleman anxiously speaking against the power of that House to institute inquiry ; but he never heard him doubt the power of that House, which should indeed be used warily—he meant the power of judging and committing, In his opinion, a Meeting should not exactly be dfsmissed by mili tary force, on account of claimant. and uproar. In this country clamour aad upmar prevailed most at Elections: and yet the policy of our law was, that,at Elections, no soldier should make his appearance, Mr. GRANT and Mr. W. Wysst mutually cz, plained.—The House then divided. • For the Motioa • . • 90 - In Against it • • . - . - 124 • Majority - • - —.14 Lord BINNING obtained leave to bring in a Bill to regulate the appropriation of Prize-money unclaimed by Soldiers and Seamen hi the East India Company's service, STANDING ORDERS. Mr. W. WYNN called the attention of the Boise to the practice of voting. money by Addresses to the Crown. Large sums had been voted in this way in thin houses ; and therefore •he moved that 'it should be,a. Standing Order.of the House that no money should Ir voted, excepi in a Committee of the whole House, and not by Address. Mr. CItEEVEY complained that after one o'clock that morning, £3,000 were granted, to compensate certain Clerks in Ireland, when he thought the House had adjourned. Lord CASTLEREAGH thought the proposition of the Hon. Member (W. Wynn) was a very valuable improvement on the practice of Parliament. • Sir J. NEWPORT complained of the modern practice of voting very large sums at very late hours. The.motion was then agreed to. • Mr. W. WYNN next called the attention of the House to the great pressure of public business at the close of each Session of Parliament, Sometimes fifty or sixty Orders of the Day were on the paper.— Many Bills were thus passed in a disgraceful manner. Something might be done by fixing, by a Resolution of the House, a day after which no Public Bill should be brought in ; but he could now only propose that a Select Committee should be appointed to inquire into the best means of expediting public business Mr. BRICIIT seconded the motion. Lord cASYLEREAGH very much concurred in this view of the question; but he thought it requiied much consideration.—The motion was then agreed to. TIIE PATENT RIGHTS BILL. Mr. CURWEN moved the second reading of the Patent Rights Bill. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL opposed the Bill.. The preamble set forth that it was to give an oppor tunity for applying for Patents, in cases of conception . of making discovery. The House never heard of such a Bill before. If a person conceived he had discovered something useful, he was to apply to the Attorney- General for a warrant to try to bring his discovery to maturity. and during the term of that warrant be was to prevent any person from having a Patent. Al though he did not wish to throw obstruCtions in the way of Patents, he was obliged to oppose a measure which he considered founded upon an erroneous view. Another difficulty arose. The framers of the Bill supposed the time allowed by the law as it stands for taking out a specification, was more.than two months. The preamble stated, that persons experienced incon venience by the extension of the time allowed for trying experiments, He found no such inconvenience in the law as it stood; and, under all the circum stances, the Bill *as se objectionable, that he was compelled to move, as an Amendment, " That it be read a second time this day six months." Mr. HUME expressed an opinion that the mere use of the word " conception," should not throw out the Bill. BefOre invention was brought to maturity, it might be called Conception, lie assured the Ilon.• and Learned Gentleman, that on many- occasions in dividuals, who had been the first to discover inven tions, were obliged to communicate their discoveries to workmen, and those workmen, catching the idea,' had obtained a Patent to the exclusion of the Inventor. This Bill was brought in to remedy the inconvenience, and if the House allowed it to . go to a Committee, much alteration and amendment might be made. The ATTORNEY-GENERAL, in explanation, said, the Hon. Member had quite misunderstood the Bill. The preamble set forth, that six months were allowed by the law, as it stands, for entering a specification, and that the said term was too long,— Now that was erroneous, the law only gave two months. CVUWEN said, individuals. would wish to have proper protection while they made their experi ments, and the. object was to enable individuals to make experiments without the risk of losing the be nefit of their inventions, • He wished the Bill to go to a Committee, in order that it might be improved.— If the Honourable and Learned Gentleman pressed his opposition, he should not divide the House, but re-consider the subject, for the purpose of bringing in another Bill as early as possible. • , Mr. D.ENMAN said, as the Bill stood he could not support it, but his Honourable Friend might turn his mind again to the subject with a view to the in, troduction of a new Bill. It appeared hard that workmen, let - into a secret for the. purpose of trying the effect of the discovery% should be abie to deprive tbeinventor of his right: to a patent. ;. The ATTOUNEY-GENEILiti observed, that uo Man could take out a tkitent hat the original inventor. —After a few words from Mr. J. P. GRANT, the Amendment was tarried,. and the Bill thrown. but. MIkCILLANI s. Mr. GRATTAN, the new Member for Wicklow, took the oaths and.bib sett. Sir M. W. RIDLEY gave notice that he would, on the 15th of March, submit a motion to the Haase for continuing the Act of his late Majesty, enabling persons to compound for their Assessed Taxes, Inks* he . -shisuld tudentand that - tit subject was under the consideration Of the Tremor!. Mr. LUSHINGTOM mid, he hid the plumate so inform the Hon. Gentleman that the subject was at Osumi under the consideration of the Treasn,rp.. A Message from the' Lords informed RIC dome that their Lordships had agreed to the Queen'e Annuity and the Malt Duty BO K without any amensinsents.. • Lord' CASTLEREAGH, In answer to a grieltion put to him by the Mtmber for -Reser (Mr. WZOT/IRN),, respecting In creasing the number of Assizes to be held for Counties in time year, said, the subject was under consiaeraticie, and be shotild,• at no very distant day, be able to give the Hoc. Member a fun answer on the subject. Mr. SCOTT pycsented a Petition from the Owners and tk copiers of Laid in Hastings and its vicinity, complaining of Agricultural Distress, and praying for relief.—Ordered to lie on the table. (ieneral HART presented a Petition from Donegal County, complaining of an expensive Police,—Laid on the table. The Scotch Jury Bill was read a second time, and committed for the Bth of May. The Iteport of the Annual Indemnity BM was received, and the ICI was ordered to be read a second time to-morrow. • Mr. ram , . gave notice of a motion for the 9th of Match, on the subject of the Criminal I.ans of Ireland. The Nova Scotia Importation 11111 was read a first time, and ordered to he read a second time tomorrow. Mr. HUMS moved for a Rcttern of the Names of the Dis tributors of Sumps in lingland and Wales, and o4tbe Bal,Ances in their hands, so far as the same could be made up. The Ilan. Gentleman also move d for similar R e turns regarding the He- of the Land M The Ilon. Member then gave notict that he would, on eh, 11th of March, ►ring forward a motion connected tvith tht s 4 subjects. Mr. HUME then moved, that there be laid before the Howe a detailed Aectiunt of the appropriation of the suns of 4.11.000, charged in the Ordnance Estimates for House-rent.—Ordered. . Adjourned at lfalf•past Twelve o'Lloch. • THE MINORITY ON Kt J. 11ACILINTOSIeS NOTION NELATIVT TO MAPLES.—TD. 21, Mho, J. H. Fitzroy, Lord J. Rise, T. S. Viscount - G. L. Ramsay, Sir ' Althorp, - , bx, U. i __ .iy, _. A, Anson, Hon. G. Glenorchy, Lord Bickford, W. Beaumont, T. W. Gordon, Robert Ricardo; David Barham, J. F. jun. Graham, Sandford liarnriden, J. C. Baring, Sir Menus Grim, J. P. Ridley, Sir M, Baring, Alekanier Grenfell, Parcae Robarts, A. Barnard, Viscount Griffith, J. W. Hobart., George Barrett, S..M. . Guise, Sir W. B. Robinson, Sir G, Beecher, W, W. Gurney, Hudson Rwnbold, Charles Bennett, Hon. IL G. Hamilton, Lord A. Russell, Lord Juhn Benyon, Benj. • Harbord, lion. FA. Russell, R. G. Birch, Joseph Hill, Lord A. Smith, lion. Itabt:rt Bernal, U. Hobbousc, J. C. Smith, John Brougham, Hoary Hornby, Edmund Smith, William . Bright, 11. Honywood, W. P. Smythe, J. 11. Bury, Viscount Howard, Ilon. W. Scarlett, J. Byng, G. . Hughes, W. L. Sefton, Earl of Benet, John Uume, Joseph • Stanley, Lord Bentinck, Lord W. Hutchinson,l4n,C.H.Stuart, Lord J. Calcraft, John Jervoise, G. P. Shelley, Sir John Calcraft, J. H. James, William Sebright, Sir J. 0. Calvert, Charles Kennedy, T. F. • Talbot, R. W. Campbell, lion. J. FrLennard, T. 11. Tierney„ Bt. lion.G. (.grew, R. S. Lambton, J. G. Tennysop„ . C. Carter, John Lemon, Sir W. IVigre J. A. Cavendish, Lord G. Langton, T. H. Western, C. C. Cavendish, Henry. ,Macdonald, James Wharton, John Cavendish, C. ➢lackintosh, Sir J. Caulfield, Hon. H. Martin, John Clifford, (7aptain Monck, J. IL Clifton, Lord Moore, Peter Wood, ilderman Wyvill, WAberell, C. Wilberforce;' W. Colborne, N. W. R. Marjoribanks, S.' Ca4tcant.on, Lucius Noel, Sir G. Crompton, Samuel Newport, Sir J. Creevey, T. O'CAlaghan, J. Corbett, P. Ord, W.- _ _ Williams; loCilliam TELLMR. DIIWIIIIOII,ViIICOUnt Wirßn, Sir Robert DvCrespigny,SirW. Ossulston, Lord Davies, T. H. Palmer, Colonel Denison, W. J. Palmer, C. ['richt . Denman Thomas Parnell, Sir IL PAIRED *Tr. Dundaa, ' Charles Parse, I lenry Ahtrtromby, 11n. J. Elliee,'lldward Phillips, G. Aubrey., Sir John Evani, William Phillips, G. jun. Barham, J. F. Farquharson, A. Power, R. Sykes, Dan. Ferguson, Sir lt. C. Price, It. Taylor, M. A. ' Mr. W. Sutra's name was omitted on Mr. CaszvEy's motion. . ~• . . PARLIAMENTARY PAPERS. Official Returns to Orders of the House of Commons, state the Wel erpense incurred by the Navy and Victualling Hoards, for conveying Settlers to the Cape of Good Hope, at' £88,760 ss. 4cl.the total amount of duty on Agricultural Horses for the year ending the sth April, 1820, at £488,489 13i. (id. and the amount of Duties on Windows for the year ending the sth January, 1820, at £2,3G6,139 12c. 10. The Ordnance Estimates fur the present year have been printed by order of the House of Commons. The accounts arc accom panied by a statement which exhibits a comparative view of the charges for the last and the present year, describing the branches of the Departnlent, and the proportions in which the retrench ments have been effected. The total amount of the Ordnance Estimates for the service of the United Kingdom in the present year, is £1;27;000, The amount for the last year, was £1,.180,000, which stews a difference in favour of the present year, of 253,000. The " Presumed credits for Old Stores," &c. in the last year amounted to £285,000 for the present year they are estimated at £232,000. The Estimates of the Sums wanted for the Miscellaneous Ser vices of the present year have been printed, and air as follows : For the Works carrying on in the College of Edinbiiigh o,coo For Building a Penitentiary at :Milbank - - 40,000 For Public Buildings - SUMO/ Extraordinary Expense in the Lord Chamberlain's De partment • For Claimants of Portuguese Vessels, captured by Bri tish Cruizert, on account of the unlawful Trading in Slaves, since 1814 - . . • . 150,000 Expenses of Commissioners for Preventing the Illegal Traffic in Slaves - - T - For Prosecutions relating: to the Coln of the Kingdom Law Charges • - . - .._ 18,700 B,COO 2531.G0 „.._ Salaries of Officers o f Lords and Commune - .E•Atii:o o,nvicts at Home : - . • - - 90,532 I - Vaccine Establibhment • - • , - • 3 , 000 Civil Orntingencies - - 90,4081. 13. liid. For RIM Drawls-Atm New South Wales 100,4,00 To. make good Deficiencies of time Fee Funds In the s Trealnry Departnteut - - • 69,415 Contin:>ort expenies In ditfo” - - - bO,OOO Expenses of Lords and Commons • - 19,055 Foreign and other SeEret Service ; Money -. 25,000 /lint Gold Coinage Expenses - - 45,(,'00 Whiting Acts of Parliament, - ' . -' gLoou Printing Journals of House of Commons . . - ... 4 , 500 For American Loyalists - - ..,. 7 . 8,0'n.) Compensations to relieve Public Clifi n ciee • -041.31 L: )46 . 041. . • c 4.,... ...j:N1;1!..v.t GEORGE THE THIRD, HIS COURT, AHD . FAMLi2X:I. We are requested to state, that the NeAvyEdlitiun o f this Work, which has been so long deli fed on ac 'count of the important additional cornm,vications made to the Author, is now ready for -dertiryTY:ai the 'different Booksellers. It will be found tb = hbotin4:rin relations of those peculiar traits of charactif 44.hich his MAJESTY was so distinguished dnrinichiirlov, and eventful Reign, and which have rendecctd hisipPr sonal history so remarkably attractive. It alsospp- Aains a richer collection of original Anecdote!pt, fr. lustrious and Distinguished Persons than has evir )et bpett submitted to.the curiosity of the Public. ' - -. - t. s r