Star. — London, England, 1803-11-10 00:00:00

' ~a ~~ ,1 lion and his feelings, which was the cafe of the Cler rvman, but for a direft provocation to fight a duel, ilhe Corn t. had determined, if poffible, by the law, to I beat it down, and they mull porfue it with a firm hand, it that obi was to be accomoliined. The i! Court, not only tree any of their Lor,ithips had fat ljrthe Bench, but lung before, had made a dif no ttioti between a coo firuelive violarinn of the peace and a direr pi avocation to fight, where the extraor dinary inlet polltitni of the Court might he more im ttely requited. ism inflance was cited, where Orliceis In the town. of Hull had quarrelled, where there had bren a plovocation to fi N lit„ and where it was impoilible for the Court to lee who was molt in the wrong ; and yet the Court let the law in motion wzainfl them, in order to prelet ve the public peace. Even it the Court, laid Mr. Erfkine, fhould not be with me, 1 have hilened with t:,e greatelt attention to oblvt s A!ions of my Learned Friend, Mr. Clifford, a. d have looked at Mr. Phillips's affidavit, and can lee no anlwer to this application. Mr. Thomas talks of the pullinggf a nole; from the enumeration of the inhabitants or Great lit itain, lately made out, and laid on the table of the Houle of Commons,it appears there are ten millions of nofes within this realm, and all :he provocation that Mr. Thomat gave, was his laying, . or his boa:ling, if you sill, that he had pulled one mole in the courfe of his natural hie. Suppole I were to fay to my friends Garrow or Mr. Dallas, I have, in the courfe of my life, pulled one nnfe ; what then, what interference could be drawn from it? Could it be laid it was any incitement, any pro vocation to fight a duel ? He next commented on Mr. Phillips's letter, and obferved, that their Lot i !hips, who cavity with them the feelings of private Gentlemen, mull fee that nothing could be more fcandalous or offenfive, either as coming out of any man's mouth, or as being put upon paper. Mr. Phil lips, infleatf of being forry for having written Inch a letter, conceived he was bound, that he was under a moral obligation to write it; and whether the expref ' lions in his Luce he well applied or nor, his Counfel laid, he had no initralions to hate. He had not yet made up hie mind to the proper application ofiuch epithets. He, the Defendant, had there two pre polte:ons propofitions to make out, that his own let ter did not contain a challenge, and that Mr. Tho mas's did. If the Court were to linen to the con flruelion whi-h any culprit might put on hia.own als, theft ails bearing svitnefs againil him, as Judge Bul ler had pally obferved, every man would go free from putufhment. If the Court were to liflen to a man who Paid he thought he was bound to do that which the Court knew he ought not to have done, their Lordfhipt, jut ifilietion would be entirely annihi lated. The Court had the opinion of this Gentleman put on them,when Mr. Thomas did not write at all to him, but only to another Gentleman. It was remark able enough that this Gentleman Mould believe he was challenged by Mr. Thomas's letter, and to be able to think his own was no challenge. Lod ELLSNIIOROUGH.+" It is not limed that any angry dircuffion took place between him and Phillips before ?" Mr. Eessistx Paid, there was not a fyllable be tween them before. Mr. Cum - ix° laid, it was Slated by Mr. Phillips that he had been informed Mr. Thomas had made op his mind to fight him. Lord ELL Nacutouo N.—“Wemufl receive any infor mation with a coufiderable degree of caution, after he (wears his own letter does not import a challenge." Mr. Easels/a laid, if the Court fhould difcharge - this Rule, this would follow . they had often Peen the lamentable confequences arifing from private quar rels, by fubllitutitig the falfe rules of honour for that obedience that ought to be paid to the laws ; and their Lordthips had laid, one after another, they were de• termined that challenges lhould be done away ; and they could only be put down by the (iron handof juf- Tice. If this rule fhould be difcharged, thefe parties might meet in a private quarrel to.morrow. He Paid he was concerned in the cafe of the" Kingv. Coffin'" and it was extremely difficult tobring thecafe, in point aria, before the Coort. The Court in that cafe ob• ferved, how far the Prolecutor had departed from the principles that ought to diffinguith every preacher of the gofpel : but when the Court thought that an 'additional reafon why his complaint ought not to be lifiened to, they did not lay it down as an abfiraft propolltion, that if the patty applying had ten years 3 before that done any aft of .t fimilar nature, that that fhould be fufficiar, in every cafe, to repel the appli cation. If the rule fhould be made abfolote, he had ' no enmity to Mr. Phillips, if he conduced himfelf with candour, and with the moderation of a Gentle man, he thruld be found, and he dared fay his cheat would be found, not difpoled, when honour was fafe, and a proper fatisfaflion given, to pref . ' things to ' their utmoll extremity. When Mr. HOXiLL role to addrefs the Court on the fame fide, The I.OPD CH IF P JUSTIC (Aid, it was unnecei fary to give himfelf any trouble. His Lordfhip nbferved, that this pi-ail/ice of fending challenges had Co much prevailed, had been In often followed by eonllottenees which introduced fo much mifery and calamity into private life, and fit mirth Mot der into civil lacier!, that lie t'll-nrld think himfelf in forve meafore accefficry to it, onlefs he did every thing he could in his judicial lituation to reprefs them ; and here a cafe came before the Court, where an unequi vocal challenge had been font. Notwithfianding what Mr. might be pleated to fay, his words im ported to every body that he meant a challenge. The other letter, shielt was previ.infly *linen by Thomas, fur adJones, certainly was a challenge. And if any quenion fhonlil he agitated as to that letter, and if the Court Should be applied to, it would appreciate every cireunthatice flated in that letter,as juilice might require. • But the only queflion ;then was, whether that letter was to !oe C(.:llolered as Inch a provocation as to hay,. pr-.fled nn the mind of Mr. Phillips to Barite the letter in que.lion ? Now, as to Jones, his language, that he mull make ',tactual atonement to his injured feelings, and Ilia! lie MI pulled one man by the note, made it pretty- dear lie wilhed him to underhand he meant to pill: his mile. Anil what did he fay as to Phillips? the bufineis with him is in an unfetticd flue. This glanced darl.ly at :rim; but even though he had been gov-recd firiAly by there perverfe rul. s of honour, lie might have waited till he had intinwed to hint More his put-- rife than he had done in that letter ; but it was fn Mixed up aid, Accounts and pecuniary num., that his utferved, he was not prepared to fay it was intended as pi oroorion to right, or any thing of that kind. In the cafe of Mr Collin, a dialinaion was taken between that which con(tituted an im mediate breach of the peace, and that which was more remote, wiling from the feelings of the mind. —That WAS the cafe of that clergyman, whofc own conduct had been fuppoled to have led the way to the perfon he moved againll, and had let him the example fume years bA . ore. That and the cir cumflances of his fituation, his Lorsaip laid, if he millook not, formed one main ingredient in the judgment of the Court. He law a felicitation, an invitation to fight a duel, and to produce that mif chief arifing on the face of Mr. Phillips's letter : but he did not lire that provocation addread to Phillips by the other letter, and therefore he thought the rule ought to be made abfolute. Judge Geost laid, he was of the fame opinion: there could be no doubt there was an intention in the DefenJant to provoke Thomas by forne of the fouleft language that could be ufed. It was impoffible to hear the letter read withodt being (truck, that nothing could be more improper. Whether any thing that paired between Mr. Jones and Mr. Thomas, might afford fahjett of mitigation in cafe that matter fhould go on, and the Defendant be brought tlp for judg ment, his Lordfhip could not fay ; but enough did not appear to his Lordflsip to warrant the Court to refule the application. Mr. Juitiee LAWRENCt thought it was clear that the Defendant meant to fend a challenge ; and that it was impoalble for any body to underfland that letter in any other way. The queftion was, whether Thomas came under Inch circumstances as to induce the Court, on his behalf, to grant the application His Lordlhip co ild not but 1-y, the lc tter of Thomas did amount to an intimation that he diJ mean to call on Mr. Phillips.—His Lordship could not help con fideling it as an intimation to Mr. Phillips what his (Thomas's) intention was; but (till he had not com municated it to Mr. Phillips, and it would not go to induce the Court not to grant the information.—Rtcle BUTTEEFiELD V. WYNNE. A rule for an attachment for an aftltult had been obtained againft the defendant; and Mr. ERSKINF flated,that he was prepared to !hew caufe againk the rule. He Paid, that the affault, fuch as it was del Ccribed to be, had taken place at a coal wharf. The plaintiff was not one of the molt refpeaable of men, and as the affidavits for the defendant, which he had to lead, were very long, he had no objeaion to the Court making the rule abColute againft the defen- dant, as he would rather prefer anfwering interro gatories before the Mafter.—Rule made abfolute. lIVICTON V. SURCIULL. Mr, mass applied to the Court for a rule to thew caufe why a new trial fhould not be allowed to take place in this cafe. This aelion had been tried at the late York affizes, and had been decided againfl the defendant. It was an aftion brought for goods fold, and raid to have been delivered to the defendant, and his partner, Charles Harrifon, who had fince died.— The fait, however, was, that Mr. Harrifon had pur chafed there goods on his own individual account, and this the learned Counfel Paid he was prepared to ellablifh by evidence. Rule granted. DOE ON DEMISE OF PASCOE V. MADDY •HD OTH Elf. In this cafe an application was made to the Court for a new trial. Mr. jIKYLL Rated, that it was an action of ejeament, tried at the late allizes for Corn wall. Doe was feized in the fee of a houfe in Pen. zance, which he bequeathed, along with his furniture, Rock in trade, and other effeas, to his wife, Joan Pafeoe. The Rock in trade, furniture, and effeds, he cleared, by his will, might be applied in eztinaion of his debts, and if thefe were not adequate to their difcharge, then fhe was to fell the houfe, in order that ate might be able to clear all his encumbrances with in a proper time. • It, howevtr, turned out that there were affets fufficient to dilcharge all the debts, and the therefore did not fell the houfe. She married I once more, and her hufband furvived her, and at his death deviled the property to the defendants. The queftion, therefore, which would ultimately fall to be decided, was, whether the widow took the eftate in fee or for life ? The' learned Counfel con ended for the latter propofition, and in fupport of his argument quoted feveral cafes, and particularly the cafe of Due on demife of Allen. Lord ELLEN BOROUGH Paid he fhould look into that cafe. In the mean time it would be neeeffary for the Court to be in polleffinn of copies of the will men tioned by the learned Counfel.—Rule granted. n0v.9.--caamis•t. 111$01MATION. Mr. EISRINE moved fora Rule to thew caufe why a criminal information thould not be filed againft the Rev. John Royle, who is the Reltor of Highley, in the county of Norfolk ; and he included in this ap plication a perfon of the name of Thomas Stenfon. The charge made on Mr. Royle, by the affidavits, was of a fimilar nature to a cafe very recently bef Ire the Court. And although the inhabitants of a parith had the privilege of returning to the Magiftrate, a lift of thole who were to be Overfeers of the Poor, the Magiftrates were not bound by their choice, but might appoint any other perfons not appearing on that lilt. Yet when that rcfdtance was made by the Magiftrates, the Court would expect it mull be done, as all other ads of Magiftrates were fuppufed to be di.oe, from a pure intention ; and if it lhould turn out that the choice of the parith had been rejellcd by this Clergyman, who is a Magiftrate, and another put in his room as Overfeer, that he the Magiltrate and this Ovei leer of his own choice, might alter the rates fo a. to relieve him of a tax on Lis property ; and that if afterwards it thould appear pretty he had induced a few of the inhabitants of the parith to offerable together to make another rate, arid jull the day before the Garter Seffions were held, fo to prevent any appeal, and keeping the Overfccr out of the way to prevent him from being let ved ; if there falls fhouid appear on the affidavits, the lubltance of which he was about to Itate, he took it for granted the CiAirt would grant the Rule. This application was made an the affidavits of Wm. Jones, Efq. the fslarlhal of the King's Bench, and other Gentlemen. It appeared, that nn the gosh of March lad, a was held in that parilb, At which moll of the principal inhabitants attended ; And it aa► un*ni• mousy refolved, that as the value of the IteElory had been inerealed from between 3 and }col. a sear to Airiest food. confbnii epee nfUlis Gentleman having tauud his rents and tidies, it was thuugl►t rcafunable that the Rev. John Rnyle fhottl l / 4 1 be rated at sool. head of 201. Its. The amount, at '2S. in the pound on soot one half of the living, was soh inflead of 21. s. ad. which he ufed to pay. It alio appeared that Thomas Stenfon and William Noble were appointed Overleers of the Poor by Mr. Royle inltead of Tho mas Ogden, who had been prefented to him by the parillt as a tit perfon for that office, and the other two very unlit. Although this Clergyman was remon *rated with on this bible.% he laid he was determin ed to have Stenfon and Noble, the full of whom only rented about 4.1. a year, and the other lived in a dillant quarter of the parilh, and was an illiterate man. The other two Magiltrates who attended at the fame time, gave Mr. Roy le credit for the purity of his motives in making that eleelion, and there tore gave up to him their (hare of the jurifdiOion. Thefe two men were appointed Overfeers of the Poor through the means and influence of this Clergyman, without the concurrence, and Apia the will of the That the sol. had been traced from the book of rates which this Magiltrate was to pay ; and there was the old fum fubllitnted in its place of zl. ts. zd. on the 201. t zs. Stenfon admitted the book had been altered, but would not Rate by whom ; In that this man was to he contidered as an instrument in the hand of this Magilti ate, to do this corrupt ad. The thing then flood thus : a regular rate had been made, by which this Clergyman's coma had been lifted up from 21. Sc. 2d. to Sol. in confequence of the life e.f his property to ICOOI. a sear. He gets a creature of his own to be Overleer. lie flid he WAS not queflion ing his jutildi lion, but was looking at his motive.— He knew no authority could alter this 501. rate with out the commiflion of a crime, and therefore he gets a few of the pal ithioners to meet and to make a new rate, bringing him back to his original atfeffments and prevailing on the other perfon to keep out of the way, to prevent an appeal againit that rate. This appeared fo plainly to be a corrupt a& in this Magif- • trace, and alto that this perfint wat his instrument, that they were-conneeted together as fora mifdemea• nom- ; and therefore he humbly applied for a Rule to thew Cjllle why a criminal information fhould not be hied again(} Ihele two perfuns, fur cohipiring to gether to alter that rate. Lord Et t ENSOROUG 14 —Take a Role to fhew caufe. WHARTON V. LUPIWkI.L. Mr. PARE moved for a rule to thew calif.: why a new trial fhould not be had in this caufe, on the ground of its being a verdia againft evidence. It was an aCtion for the penalty of 5001. in an Al made agaiaft Bribery at Elations of Members to ferve in Parliament, tried at the IA affizes at York, before Mr. Baron Timm rsow, when a verdia was found for the plaintiff. There were feveral counts in the declaration, but he Paid it was fufficient for him to name one of them —The perfon who was Rated to have been corrupted was Alex. Gleaner, who was fail to have been cor rupted by the Defendant to give his vote for the laft eleaion for the county of Durham. The declaration Rated that the laid Alexander Gleaner, who then and there had a right to give his vote at the laid eleCtion, to induce him to gise his vote to Richard Lambton and Michael Angelo Taylor, Efiirs by a corrupt promife, which the defendant then and there made to the Paid Alex. Gleaner, to give to him the fum of 71. and bear hi: expences to the laid eleetion, and to pay him, the Lid Alexander Gleaner, fur his 101 l of time on that ocearion, according to, and in the fame manner as the laid Richard Wharton fhould pay as and by way of reward :or him the Paid Alexander Gleaner, to give his vote at that eleaion for the laid R. J. Lambton and M. A. Taylor, contrary to the ftatute,&c. There were two other counts, Rating, that they did corrupt this man by making to him a cor rupt promife, &e. The Ad of Parliament was that of the 2d Geo.H. c. 24.. fec. 7. and he would call to the attention of the Court the words of the Alf as they were applied to this cafe, which Rates, " That if any perfon (hall ark or receive, or take airy money, or office and emo lument, to give, or to refufe to give, his vote, or if any perfon by himfeif, or any palm employed by him, do or fall by any gift or reward, or by any promife, engagement, or fecurity for any gift or re• ward, corrupt or procure any perfon or perfons to give his or their vote nr votes," then the penalty is to attach of Soot. and the other penalties which at- tach under the flame. The evidence of Gleaner he believed he could , 1 Rate pretty accurately to the Court. When he went to the houfe where the Defendant was, ire law the Defendant, and anced him if he was a Freeman of the City of Durham ? He anfwered, I am. He then anted him who he meant to vote for ? I told him Mr. Wharton. He then alked me if I owed any ohliga tion to Mr. Wharton? And I laid, No, I he under nn obligation. He aiked me if I would vote for Taylor and Lambton? I laid I would nor vote for them, firr I had promifed my vote to Mr. Wharton, and that I would not change my voice. This, Mr. Palk laid, was all that paired on the fird occalion.— They met again; and lie anced me, laid the witnefs, if I would not change my vdice ? I laid I would not, I had promifed my vote, and I fhould Rand to what I had laid. Then there was a third meeting. The Defendant laid he would pay me 71. it I would change my voice, betides my travelling expellees to Durham, it I would vote tor Lanibton and Tayinr. ':hat was the whole of the evidence oat the part rt . the Plaintiff, to rrove tl:e fags as laid againit the Defen dant, with this addition, the witnets laid, and that I fhould be paid at Durham the fame as Whatton's men for lots of time. The Witnels raid too, that he never prnmiled to vote for Lambton and Ta)lor, and that he aanally voted for ll'harton. CHIEF Jusrick—Did he fay that the prornife had any corrupt etfeo for a ti.ne on his mind ? Mi. Pasta—" No, my Lord, never." lie In Rated and pertilted in it over and over again, that it had no effeCt upon his rand. Mr. Parra then coutended ;liar this was not to be considered as a promifc w i thin the meaning of the A't of Parliament. Cuter Jusrsc —ln order to mak." the promife, you contend, in order to maLe a corrupter, the other mutt be a corrupted. Mr. Putt laid, that he never went the length (nr4- (hfluid he, as the cafes were tht other way) of con tending that it was ne;:tfary the party (honkd vote on the I;eie the idle' v. is made, hut thit he thould either take the money, or that the promife mutt have had fume cilia upon him at the time ; and this /tensed to be the opinion of Mr. Baron Th, mpfon upon the trial, well as that U! Mr. jUaiCC C;:ambit at au ...tiler of the fame V.ind at Darham, which Mr. Pali quotcd, and then ohfetve,l, that in every view this WAS a very serious cafe, the penalty was great, and there were many inconveniences attending it to the Defendant, for which re tion it flunild he thoroughly, fif:cd, and he hop ,l the Court would grant a rule to (hew eaufe.—Rule granted. BARNETT V. GRANARD AND STUART. Mr. READER mover for a Role to thew cattle why the judgment in this caute thould not be let afide, and. why the Warrant of Attorney Ihould not be brought' into Court upon the following (late of fads: The Counteis of Gr.tnard had fume time fince been at: - relied, and being in cullody, applied to the Plaintiff as her attorney to liberate her. The Plaintiff laid he would give an undertaking, it he had collateral fek cu:itr, to the amount of the debt, which was Goof. The Conn:els applied to Lieutenant-Colonel Stuart. of the Life Guards, who told the Plaintiff that he did not know enough of the Countefs' affairs to war-, rant his giving any leen, ity for the payment of the. deist, but that he had that confidence in the Coun teis's honour, lie would give any fecuxity for her ap. pearance. He accordingly joined with the Countefs in a Warrant of Attorney to confefs a judgment for 6+ol. on the fole condition, as he underitood, that Ihr fhould appear at the return of the writ. But the Plaintiff had catered up A judgment on the warrant for kis bill of fees. Alarmed at this, Gen. Stuart hid fent his Attorney to examine the warrant of At. toiney, which, by a late rule, mutt be filed, and it now appealed that there was added to the condition an mulct taking for the payment of the Plaintiff's bill; bat it was lingular that this addition was in one fmall line of intcaueation of that ground he moved that the indrument itlell fhould be brought imto Court.— The Counters alfo in her affidavit listed, that the Plaintiff had received more money on her account than would pay all that was doe to him ; he had therefore added to this motion, that the warrant of Attorney Ihould be delivered to be cancelled, upon payment of what fhould appear to be due.—Rule Njjf granted. MARRIED. On Tucittay Lilt, Mr. Gcorgc TwiniN, to Mitt Bretaftcr, of Clapton. DW D. Thurfday fe'nnight, aged 7s. the Rey. Levis Stephens, M. A. many years Student of Chtift Church,and Redtor of nemby Wiltti and the Impropriator of the church of Langford, in Itafordlibire. TO THOMAS TAYLOR ESQ.... DT AR SIR, N. 9, Bridge-Urea, Lague. I FEEL it a duty incumbent upon me, to inform you of the very great and extraordinary Cure I have received Prow your invaluable Medicin K k.'s PATENT PILLS, About two years ago I was attacked with a VENIRRAIL Ds- URI/ER, which I mated rather (lightly fur tome time, brat the Di(. eafe at length (Treading al/ over my Body, I was obliged to app to the mat eminent of the Faculty, but their affillanee affurddl only temporary relief—l went through various Courfes of Saliva. non, and from being lather of a corpulent Habit was reduced tes a men. Skeleton. The Ulcers that fpre.ui all ova my limbs, ren dered me a complete Object, fa that my friends defpafred of ma recovery. When brought to this fintatko, I confidered death as Mevitable, but a relation of mine commenting upon the many Calm in which your Pills had fucceeded, I was induced to a box of them, whlth I thought rath.s relieved me, and by perfeverancy two or three months, am! following your Direction, I expos rienced the moR unaccountsbk Relaxation from Path, the Sore. graduediv fulafiding; I am now, thank GOD, veiledly and walking out daily t I doubt Oct but oae more bo l Z e Z e i l eri think cautious to rake, will eftablith soy health in its origami/tato. It i, With the moft heartfelt gretitude that I fubfcribe myfelf, fir, 'oar much obliged humble arvant, Wit. 'mason. Demfgate, Manchelter, July 1, aor. P. S. Fos the public benctitl donut objc to the above belie publifised, but leave you to ail as your UWO hetterjudgasent dud dicrute. Prepared and Sold by the Sole - Proprietor, TROMAS Tim Lon. Meml..y of the Royal Collrre of Surgeons, Leedom, u his Houk. No. 9, New.Bridgodtreet Where, after a cardlant refidener o f more than t hit trair years, in a practice panicutoriy diroelcdfla the Cure of Venereal Complaints, with that inviolabk fancy which men of his Proferton Mould always °Verve, he 'flatters himfelf. the advice and ofliftance he gratritoully admittiften perfons taking this Medicine, will be etteemed, by a dikaning Public, as an advantage feldom to be obtained, and void of mold guity.—Alfo Said, by hi: Appointment, for the unreal:nee of that living at a dlflance, at the Perfumcr:s, Nd. 35, St. Mani 'teal, Pall-Mall; the Tay.lhop, No. 103, Orford-ftrcet ; Mr, Dithorough's, No. 7, FA-fires-Wall ; Mr. Steel's, &saki - elk*. No. t, Unicin-kow, Little Tower Hill;. Mr. Watfon 'a, South. bridge, Edinburgh ; Mr. Colwell's, Dublin ; Mr. WlYngei, I.iver • pool; Mr. Atkinfu's, hlanchcaer ; and by one Perfon in evert conSilerable Town In Great-Britain and Ireland, in Bores of only. as. 9d. each, failed up with full and plain Direelionts wheurilt Perko s of either Set may Cure thanktves with Date, Speed, Se m cy, and Safety. W HEN Profegional Men of education and te• fponfibiUty deviate from the general fyftem by the feketiott of a peculiar Branch, the Candi= eelang own:sued Weeds is the bait criterion of fuperiorky. Ten years have I devoted my pradtke to the ezetufive treatment of THREE DISORDERS, and thc fucceftful rekilt of my play gives me add.tional ardour to oppofe as fur as I ant able the ra• thofe complaints which are the moll barman' in the ate. loges of hunt= intirmiuss. After Mitiatrio into every branch as an Army Surgeon, I formed a wia at an cosy period of PraCtice to rideue iudivldrab from thc ignorance or un-ducated Men, or the equally dangerous precinitausv of genera! PriChtinuvrs. tive THREE DiSORDERS. to the cure of which I have dented my attention. comprise every fpecies of VENEREAL INFEC- E. 0.4. w 1 e 1 a s r of a recent or tong duration.--adiv, AU kinds of DF.BILITY, whether arising from the habits of 'Schoolboys, or the indulgencs of mature age, and billy that dersagemeatir the totem in tt'ornen which is called IIARRENNESSorSTERILIET. Numerous 4,iieafee are the Walt of Ignorance or bah in the treitrovut of a Settple Gonorthea, and it not untrenuendy happen. :hp the feeds of Life are ;via:toed by the andifeeetion of an unguar4s ed hour. By a fuperfor method loch complaints arc talky curuk and even where others have failed, I [nail that 1 may reins:us la ofrr a radie.al re.eitablamert. Yew, however, arc the ca:es of complicated dtftrefs In the dlf nrit.r,, compared with the caLussitous (mations of Alen, who fruits ineulgave in a SOLITARY VICE, or the prevalent (Millet of a la.lionablt life, arqulre that date of Debility otitis Is the ur::• C.table cooky:mace nt luch pemaciou. habo so Where the unhappy fulerer broods r.ver his misery, but carefully cowed. bin it may be tome confolation far him r ,, bnow, that :11:hOUCh it be to °led et dnuat o'btr tent r.. the renhod nr ±afe gradual progref. of renns:tion is the nequiremsut If tlit titre a larch:. or Veaus have begun ,- gout, mutt safety *l'. 'or prevented by en this languid Rue. and to these cafes an great But wive. r slut echeiercy has for years fru-ranee i. I i ipnniM7 teowiete to revive and to rc-anoolte the ,ConAitotioa. WOMEN. twbo lasi ther otpctimi3na of a Fameiy, may heal Hawn IMA &fees arr eurOlte by Mrtby 16- SECKE.' Y nh , s..‘ 6 (, rPcrtt.4 to QuatthrAtion• t I bow prehtnte..lo my 0rtia.G....9, ..1 in coinadt-nce with gnat, that Mr. BIM may be confiatett , indoting • [man mate) at 614 hot*. No. ht,. rx•r Temple-Ilse 'Mere is so addiriaissi entrance Ili Wilton) the sisse is so both the tem. lit. MEE. Mersber et the Rossi Cellos 1.21,4D0N Primed sod pohlilind by Li vcrhortillsos, Lainbeli) of do v*a OM( rabinied alio a tin irmi 0.1 eau Na IA 11.11 ta. obj ca (111 pc, C3 r l l'a L. and Ic comwazion ler BM. .• 'Mt 3 or uncut - AMY lru . ‘ Dl lICIENCIES by On 4 iremetnuf my experience run tat reduce manly tl i , an early counteraellue of h!, eat diticukma will occur. Pre exedra, a reupar Kr- 1, b ire the Llumer!nr (parka so. „ is b u n dirappetnted h . f allured, that in mod lar 1,01 al litill.:•• my underrating, 33111 tht ;. 3 Rate, feint ac 11•15 4 fuch ib introtatio• Is I parfunally (se by letter* 0, airundel.drcet. amid. 'ater-Rrat Atgr•lns. 324 t , Dana fterar 4 . • •• ViEL irjitir. con. . t Otrtem, t. Can! mass , lion& • • . mmwmmnll