Star. — London, England, 1810-12-14 00:00:00

Mr. SfIADWELL applied to his Honour on the part of the Proprietors of Covent-Garden Theatre, to sus pend an injunction which had been yesterday obtain ed from the Chancellor by Mr. Morris, of the Hay. market Theatre, for preventing the acting of the New Farce X. Y. Z. The facts upon which Sir Samuel Romilly obtained the injunction were, that in the year 1805, Mr. Morris had entered into partnership with Mr. Colman, in the concern of the Haymarket Theatre ; and that there was an engagement between them, that Mr. Colman should write only for the " Haymarket Theatre." After this piece had been given in, notice was sent by Mr. Morris to the Pro prietors of Covent Garden Theatre, that he intended to apply for an injunction to stop the representation of it. They proceeded notwithstanding, and there fore it was necessary to make the application. The Chancellor considering the injury that might result to the Covent Garden Proprietors, from disappoint ing the expectations of the public, allowed the Farce to be acted last night ; but granted the injunction to stop any further representation till he had heard the parties. Mr. SIIADWELL stated, that the Covent Garden Proprietors had announced the piece for representa tion this evening, in the hope that the Lord Chancel- 1 tor, upon a statement of the circumstances, would dissolve the injunction ; and they had done this, be cause, unless the representation was continued night after night, the benefit of the farce would be almost entirely lost to the Proprietors, notwithstanding the rum they had paid for it to Mr. Colman ; and the 4 xpence they had been put to in bringing it forward. lie stated that he had an affidavit of Mr. Harris, that they had received no notice of the engagement between Mr. Morris and Mr. Col Man, till they had asVianced £2OO upon account to the latter, and made preparations for acting the Farce ; and he therefore submitted that the Proprietors of Covent Garden Theatre stood in the situation of purchasers for valua ble consideration without notice ' • and that the en gagement between Morris and Colman ought not, in this instance, to affect them. The application had been made this day at the Lord Chancellor's house, but his Lordship was out of town, and not expe-t -ed to return till late in the evening. They were therefore under the necessity of applying to his , Honour to interfere so far as to permit the acting of the piece this night till they could apply to hi. Lordship. - _ The MASTZIt of the ROLLS asked, whether he had any power to suspend the Lord Chancellor's in junction ? Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY, nn the part of Mr. Morris, agreed with the Master of the Rolls, that his honour had no authority in this case. The Proprietors of Covent Garden Theatre, he apprehended, had acted very rashly in announcing the piece for repetition, after notice last night of the Chancellor's injunction. He had not heard any proposal from Mr. Shadwell to account for his share of the profits to Mr. Morris, in case he ultimately succeeded, provided Mr. Morris should be disposed to consent upon these terms, that the Farce should be performed to-night. Mr. SHAnwr.r.t. said, that they had no objection to these terms. Sir SAMUEL ROMILLY then consented to wave the injunction for one night, upon the condition stated, observing, however, that it would be no easy matter to settle what should be Mr. Morris's share; as it would be necessary to decide how many came to see Gustavus Vasa, and how many to see X. Y. Z. THURSDAY, DECEMBER 13. X. Y. X.—MORRIS V. HARRIS AND OTHERS. In this case . an injunction had been obtained by Mr. Morris, one of the Proprietors of the Haymarket Theatre, for restraining the defendants, Proprietors of the Theatre, Covent Garden, in performing a new Farce, under the title of 41 X. Y. Z." written by George Colman, Esq. An application was made this day, by Mr. HART, to the Court, praying that the said injunction might be suspended for the present, on the ground that the Proprietors, having given a valuable consideration to Mr. Colman for the copy-right, and the public cu sosity being awakened to see the piece, the damages which the applicants would sustain would be consi derable, if the injunction was continued. It was fur thermore insisted, that Mr. Morris, who i 3 concerned in the Haymarket Theatre with his brother-in-law, Mr. Colman, could not have any right to demand a "lien" on the genius of that Gentleman. His abili. ties as a play-weight were in fact all that remained to enable him to provide for his maintenance, in the pre sent shipwrecked state of his fortunes, and although it wat tine that an agreement was made between the parties that he should not write any play for any other . Theatre, yet it would not be contended that Mr. Mor tis could compel the exertion of his abilities. After Sir S. RorarrJA had been heard for the Co vent Garden Managers, The LORD CHANCELLOR, without giving any opi nion on the merits of the case, directed that an order should be made for suspending the injunction for the presont, with this understanding, that on the merits of the case being fully before the Court, if it should appear the Haymarket Theatre were legally interest ed in its suppression, then the Proprietors or Covent Garden Theatre should be accountable for the p:ofits during its being performed. LAW INTALLIb EN CE. COURT OF CHANCERY, DECEMBER it x. Y. Z. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DEC. 12. 10LCAN V. CAP. This was an action to recover from the defendant /:57 for the fixtures andgood-will of a cheesemongcr's shop, sit sated in Ebenezer-row, Commercial•road, let to him by the plaintiff. The defence set up was, that ao good-will was to be given for the shop, and that the fixtures were to be taken at a fair v;;lmition. A witness, however, was called, on the part of the plaiiuiff, who was present when the agreement was mat seed into between the parties, and he proved that the plaintiff then said, he would have £57 for the 'statures and good-will, take it or leave it ; and that Ole cirfetuktint agreed to it, and paid a deposit of one pound, d;:eiring the plaintiff not to la the premises to :boy one else. ~.Tire defendant pleaded a, set-off of RG, which was 4towed by the e iei ! ltiti ; and £'2G having been paid into Court, the Jury found a verdict for the plaintiff fur etti, and 40s. costs. 4 • • 11 . 1 epl 9. COM This was an action to recover £23 11s. V.. leas, and 45 2a. lid. for the resat of a piece of poet 'toe gropnd. , Mr. Toprixa stated the case, and said the - were both natives of Bandon, in Ireland, t were also relations, the plaintiff being nephew defendant; they had given a joint promisory a third person for £lOO, which the plaintiff discharged: the plaintiff's signing it was merely to accommodate the defendant : this he would prove by a witness who heard the defendant acknowledge that he was in debted to the plaintiff in the sum mentioned in the de claration ; and that he was also indebted to the plain tiff in the sum of £.5.25. Ild. for a piece of potatoe ground which he had rented. The transaction took place in Ireland, in 1506, from which time the defen dant had resided in this country. He would prove the defendant's acknowledgment of the debt, which would entitle the plaintiff to a verdict. John Scott deposed, that he was the proprietor of a public-house at Bandon, in Ireland, in the year 1806 : the plaintiff and the defendant came into his house to settle their accounts, and the defendant acknowledged that he was indebted to the plaintiff in the sum set forth in the declaretion. Mr. PARK addressed the Jury, as Counsel for the defendant. Lord ELLENBOROVGH summed up the evidence, and observed, it was very singular that this action should be brought in this country; particularly so, as the rent for the potatoe-ground could have been recovered by a very simple process in Ireland. It appeared strange that , a transaction which took place in 1306, in Ire land, should be brought in the Court of King's Bench in London in 1810, and supported by a witness who has nothing but his memory to assist him, without any memorandum. It would be for the Jury to con sider what credit should be giiren to the witness, and for them to give their verdict according to their opi nion of that evidence. The Jury gave a verdict for the defendant. DEC. 13.-HUGHES V. NAYLOR. This was an action to recover the snm of £525 upon a bill of exchange, of which the defendant was the acceptor. Mr. MARRYATT stated the circumstances of the case, by which it appeared that the plaintiff had been completely swindled out of his property, consisting of 3CA beasts, by a combination of swindlers. The plain tiff was a Welchman and a cattle dealer, who employ. ed his brother to sell for him. The brother, who ap peared as a witness, was a simple Welshman, and a very likely subject to be duped by the artifices of the designing. In the month of March, in the year 1806, he was at Croydon Fair with A lot of beasts. The de fendant, in company with a person who called himself Stratton, came to him to purchase his beasts. Naylor appeared very much like a gentleman, and talked very largely before the poor Welshman of his estate and brewery at St. Alban's. He affected to be above dining in the common room with the dealers, but in sisted on a room and dinner to himself, and invited the witness to dine with him. There was in their com pany one Tyndall, a hay salesman, of whom the wit ness knew a little. While they were at dinner, Mr. Naylor and his friend spoke a great deal of Naylor's supposed concerns at St. Alban's. At last Mr. Nay lor observed to Mr. Shelton, that he had not brought money with him, and he must draw on Stratton for £6OO to pay for the cattle ; to which Stratton re plied, 44 Oh yes, Sir, for a thousand if you please." —Tyndall then interposed, and observed, it was all the same, as his friend Hughes would take their bill. The poor Welchman, supposing his customers must be persons of great respectability, took the bill ; and when it became due, no such brewer was found at St. Alban's, nor any where else. By diligent in quiry, however, the defendant Naylor was lately ar rested at Dalston, near Hackney ; and the defence now set up was, that he was not th e Mr. Naylor who had accepted the bill, but another of the same name, and his Attorney had been instructed to take out a summons to compel the plaintiff to produce a bill be fore a Judge, in order that he might see it and have a copy of it. The Learned Judge then told him, if he would swear he had never made any such bill, he would grant an order for producing it. But this Mr. Naylor declined. The Attorney for the plaintiff went further, and stated he would produce the bill at any time, if he, the defendant, would produce himielf to the witness in order to see whether he could identify his person or not, but this he also declined doing, and they never could get sight of him. It wa; also proved by a waiter of the Langbourn Ward Coffee-house, that a person, calling himself R. Naylor, used at that time to frequent the house, and was frequently met there by a Mr. Stratton. Lord ELLENBUROUGH said, the defendant, as he had notice that his personal identity was in question, was most imperiously called upon to shew himself, that the witness might see whether he was the same Nay lor or nnt, who gave the bill, and it was the strongest presumption against him, that he did not do it.-- Verdict for the plaintiff. JUDGE MORGAN AND VALLEY. This was an action to recover damages for a mali cious- arrest. Mr. JEavis stated that this was an action brought to recover damages, by the plaifitiff, against the two defendants, for arresting him for the sum of W3OO, without any probai)le cause of action. He (the Learned Counsel) would prove the malicious arrest by the testimony of Mr. Waddington, late a great dealer in hops. Some preliminary evidence was gone into, when the Learned Judge (Lord ELLENnonouou) directed, that the plaintiff should be misuited, on account of some irregularity in the pleadings. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, DEC. Is. GRUEN U. BARKER. This was an action for assault and battery. The plaintiff and defendant were Officers in the Customs!; and it appeared that they had quarrelled respecting sone tea in the Grstorn-house. The plaintiff having refused to leave the defendant's office, a pugilistic contest ensued. The plaintiff was overthrown in the combat, and received a few blows. Mr. Scrjeant Coucto., on the part of the defendant, made a humourous appeal to the Jury. He observed, that in this paltry action a few blows of no conse quence had been represented as a most violent assault. AlearnedAnatomist and Surgeon had been called, and a touch on the plaintiff's shoulder was called a bruise on the scapula; a blow ot; the back, a coutusiou on the have said, a you you must expect blows. The Learned Serjeant conclu ded by calling on the Jury, if they were of opinion that the assault was proved, to give the plaintiffa far thing, in order that he might hang it round his nick. The Learned Serjeant observed, it would be a good new year's gift ; and the plaintiff by looking at it would avoid fighting, and say, if I should get a touch on the spine or scapula, I won't commence an action, because an English Jury won't give ine more than a farthing damages. The Jury found for the plaintiff—Damages Is. I'ESDRILL 11. AITCHINSON. _ This was an action brought by the plaintiff, a boot maker, residing in Newgate-street, against the defen dant, one -of the same trade, in Butcherhall-lane, to revover damages for slander. It appeared, that the parties met at the Plough, in Giltspur-street, in No vember last, to celebrae the acquittal of Mr. Hardy, and " Trial by Jury." When , the plaintiff entered the room, he was charged with having seduced a married woman; in answer to which, he said, if he was a seducer, he had followed the example,of the defendant. The latter then rose and used the words, " You an: a thief ; you have robbed me, and I can prove it." For these words, described to be void of the least foundation, the plaintiff expected large da. mages. The first witness was cross-examined by Mr. Ser• jeant BEST, who put the following questions to prove that all the company had been making a liberal sacri fice at the shrine of the jolly god : What time did Mr. Pendrill come into the room? About half-past ten o'clock. You had been to celebratethe acquittal of Mr. Hardy, at the Crown and Anchor Tavern ?—Yes, we had. You had taken your glasses cheerfully ; drank wine enough, I suppose ?—We took it at discretion, as every man should do. I take it for granted a few bumpers were drank ? I don's recollect any bumpers. What ! not drink Mr. Hardy's health and Trial by Jury in a bumper ? If you did not you don't deserVe a verdict in future from any English Jury. It was contendA ou the part of the defendant, that the words were spoken in the moment of inebriation, and that they were not used to convey a charge of fe lony. It was also stated, that the defendant had been deprived of several of his customers by the plaintiff, who had formerly lived with him as a journeyman, and, under all the circumstances, that it was not a case for damages. The Jury found a verdict for the plain. tiff—Damages Is. COURT OF EXCHEQUF,R, DEIBLIN. EXECUTORS OF FAGAN V EARL OFLLANDAFF, &C. The CHIEF BARON pronounced the judgment of the Court in this cause—the most weighty and arduous in this Court, which has lasted nearly 30 years, in• volved numerous interests, and embraced some of the most important questions. The bill was filed by several creditors for the sale of the great estates of Annefield, in the county ofTip perary (the ancient patrimony of the Mathew family) for the payment of the debts of the late T. Mathew, Esq. of Annefield, father of the late, and grandfather of the present Earl of Llandaff. In 1789 the plaintiffs obtained a decree, directing an account to be taken of all the debts ; and now, upon the Officers' report, made nearly two years ago, after vat ions amendments, it appeared that the amount of the several debts claimed exceeded £80,000( The defendant, the Earl of Llandaff, contended in sup. port of a claim set up by his father, that he was en titled, as first incumbrancer, to a charge of £90,000, with a long arrear of interest, under certain articles executed upon the intermarriage of his grandfather, T. Mathew, with Catherine Mathew, in 1736, and confirmed in 1716. The other creditors opposed this claim, and con tended, that the late Earl was not entitled to set upl those judgments. The Court this day decreed finally, that the Earl of Llandaff's claims under those judgments must be postponed to those of all the other creditors ;—they held that the late Earl had wholly relinquished them, even if valid, by a deed executed in 1774, by him and his father—which being in the nature of an honour-, able family arrangement, must be held conclusive ; 1 and directed that this patrimonial estate of Annefield shall he sold publicly within three months, and the produce be applied to the payment of the other credi tors (to the exclusion of Lord Llandaff) ; that all' the costs expended by the plaintiffs be paid ; and if any surplus remains, it shall be subject to future ar gument, However, the debts are supposed to exceed the produce of these estates by forty thousand pounds and upwards--and thus the Earl's claim is in effect annulled. It is singular that the late Lord Avonmore was Counsel in this cause, when Mr. Yelverton ; he after wards pronounced several orders, and the first decree in it as Chief Baron, between 1788 and 1808. The present Chief Baron was also leading Counsel for Lord Llandaff in this cause for 15 years, argued it frequently and powerfully in his behalf ; and now, after having presided five years, and taken nearly 12 months fur consideration since the last argument, he has ultimately decided against the validity of all these chims of his own quondam client. This, however, only proves the intricacy of the case, and the daub:- ful construction of the deeds aad documents, as well as the candour and impartiality of the Judge, who thus avows his change of sentiment upon grounds which have impressed his mind with the substantial justice of the case. An Inquest was held on Wednesday evening, at the llorso and Dolphin, Macclesfield -street, Soho, before A. Gm.t., Esq. Coroner for Westminster, on the body of Mr. Simons, who lost his life in the dreadful fire at the Mexican Hotel, in Lisle -street, on S:►turday last. The body was discovered lying in a heap of rubbish at eight o'clock on Wednesday morning, one side• being entirely burnt.—Verdict Accidental death.— The body of Mrs. Simons has not yet been discover- ed ; a great number of workmen were employed yes terday to dig in the ruins, but no trace of her could be found. • ‘a Isprne. . ketire as ArleiSh boxing !d. money ' match wax wou d not soder themselves to be imposed te of pout- ion by anatomical terms. The plaintiff had only re- ceived, in the iermt of pugiliim, two slight hits, one she parties on the back, the other en the shoulder. What vvould and they Big Ben and Johnson have said, if a man who had tew of the fought a battle 144 complained of It blow on the ry note to spine ? They would have said, " if you fight, you . ~ Ph, Y.rarnPd Serieant conclu- .- Yesterclit, 7. what, a fellowsh; ged, at the Mansion House..on cause of the death of another porter, ' Dock. It appeared the prisoner quarrelled cm board of a boat at lii deceased struck the prisoner, w 1 so forcibly, that he knocked hr when he immediatelr went to his him, at the risk of his life; but 61 the blow or fright, that the deck It not appearing that the prisoner kill, he was ordered to find bail . A person was charged with (ow of a note for £lB, purporting to be of a Mr Cobham, who, having ' note, denied any knowledge of , soner taken up for a forgery. The heard him express a doubt but hand-writing, and begging to send heard the same, this per so ► came Cobham knew it, Tie was not to repeatedly called, and not appear, discharged. Yesterday T. Moore, Sarah Bay were fully committed from Hat charged on the oath of one Robert! with stealing from his person R 7 " the Earl of Moira's Head public• The enjoyment of Sunshine wish of Diogenes ;—but modern more wisely anxious to receive the which may be obtained by advem State Lottery, which is so formed the beneficial Rays of all former Focus, thus presenting the Publ . R Prizes, and greater Choice of Nr_ crease of Tickets, bdt so arranged, of three or four different Num,- Twenty Thousand Pound Prize ' whole of which, amottnting to T' sand Pounds, will be drawn in bruary next. The grandest field of animal sented to public view, is now open nagerie, Exeter 'Change, since i possession of the enterprizing every rare quadruped and bird attainable in this climate, have been ginal collection, such as the Rhir corn, the scientific Elephant. bear Egyptian Camel, kangaroo, Am more ferocious kind a number Royal Tygers, Panthers, Leopard! Ichneumon, Jackallsokc. with of the feathered tribe, including the largest smallest birds ever seen living in this kingdom. stupendous male African Ostrich, eleven feet and upwards of SOO weight. The An great Emews, and Cassowary of New South the tender Pelican of the Wilderness ; several crown Cranes, the.eyrus, condom Adj saws, and an immense variety of other rare .. the most splendid plumage, all young, healthy clean, classically divided into three different ; ments, constantly aired with a patent retort that not only affords a comfortable beat, a circulation of pure air, which totally prevents unpleasant odour. COUNTRY MARKETS. NrwcaiTLE, Dec. 8 --We had to-day a from the Farmers, which went eft nearly at last Corn nothing was done, except for exportation. enquired after, and about 2s. per quarter higher. difficult to make, and no more than 425. can be obtained best qualities. Oats very dull sale, and something lower. Wheat, G:s. to 88s.—Rye, 265. to 45s.—.Malt, 7(s. to Barley, 265. to 43s.—Oats 235. to 2111.--White Pease S4S. —Grey do. 425. to 45s.—Beaes, 441. to 465. • fine, 725. to 765. per sack. HADDINC I'o N, Dec. 7.—Wheat sold very dull, and , about 2.1.6 d. cheaper. Barley about 2s. per boll dearer. Oats4i per boll dearer. Pease and Beans about n. dearer. • • owshippn t tp rorm an susp icion of b r i n „ porter, at Billing:sc4t. ler and the dec eix ,t h t Billi"gsgan., v ,h os who returned the I horn into the riv e is assistance and ca at such was the et f m i $1 leceaset! died sett oner h.id any inte nt , .VE 61 for maml.iughter, .k Pe forging the acc.., to be the liancl•tlit. • to 1. 1 ig been arrested k;r of it, and had the • .E The defendan t h a • at that it might be 'to" send for a witness sat. • ucav tme ; but as soon a s , , to be. found; and, be',, in du taxi*, the prison:: 01 Bayley, and Ann Inunl Hatton-Garden 0. tior oberts, a Welch d . IL aC7S, in Bank rotes, al lic-house, Saffron.hai. CA 14 4 Deli ne was a predominera odern l i i s r.wi e the E lc Snoshiorf f,r% • to uleenttiring in the (VW • B tmecl as to concentrat '" roar Schemes into 0 , 4 'brie 11 ink more Capita M/ f Numbers, yet no is or anged, that a puffballs cd Tambers may obtain a rat e ate ze by each of them. to aiso 1 o Two Hundred Thos. taint in One Day, 15th Fe. 'en .114 Hari mated nature ever pie, open at the Royal Me. 19, ! :e it has come into the HO Mr. Pouro.—tllmost HC ird that has ever beat . 1 , e been added to the . • • c b thinoceres, or real Di. .1 of beautiful Zebra, Elk. •:4 Antelopes; and of • " D ',l her of majestic Lions, ,ards, Jaguars, Hyena; , an extensive assemble ion uding the largest and in this kingdom. 'lle .. ,trich, eleven feet hi : , 'be American Obtriches, of New South W i Ai lderness ; several royal ire' c t adore, Adjutant, C. • c l e : rof other rare birds e j i three different a,rds:' +ll young, healthy a patent retort 5... ortable beat, but a... 141 7 ch totally prevents any ,ItK.ETS• D-day a large supply of Whist A wady at last prices. la ,•• vt Tportation. Good Rye m • arter higher. Sales of Barky 425. can be obtained for de and something tower. o 451,--Malt, 765. to 101-• IL...White Pease Ms. to* 1. to 461. per quaver.-nur, ;old very dull, and prices wo!, N I~! N liIRTHS. Lately, the Lady of Newton Dickenson, Esq. late of the o'l2* stream Regiment of Guards; of a son and heir. At Bengal, the Princess Ems 0 De Otha, wife of F4wud Ro- berts, late Director-General and Commander in Chief of Army employed in the Indian wars, In the Marquesas filo' a first-born sun. —This Princess, the consort of Mr. Ro . .erts.* the daughter of Carta, the reigning King of the Marstesso group of islands In the South bra, is the latitude of 9 Begets SS min. S. Mr. Roberts, a I,a; ire of W a l e ., h av i ng b ri m l e ft oath, principal island, remained there seven years, durilg which use he was vested with the oorntuand of the army, and the nuioge. meat of the military affsirs of the Wand; and, having renders) his Majesty many signal services. he was pleased to smite his in wedlock with his daughter Etta, with whom Mr. Roberts bo ever singe lived'happily, acid by whom he has had three dseg'a:!:s and the son above-mentioned. Unfortunately. Mr. Roberts is agreed with the brother of the Ptincess, who .dined at thee , thronentent of his fatter. In consequence of the uificrencrflss ing from that source, Mr. Roberts determined to quit the by the first opportunity ; and the Lucy privateer, of LorakYo chancing to touch there, swot after the resohnion was tortruls Roberts, his consort, and children, were rcc.lved the Lucy, and cart led to Otaheite, whore they were landed- tr . ' 3 Otabeite, they found their %%ay to New 7.eals3d. therce tJ Holland, and thence to Prince of Wales IsiaLd, and 11.:,::!! .• Calcutta. MARRIED. On Thursday the I Oth instant, at St. Mary-la-Bonne Char :k g Henry Croniwtll Frankland, lag. to Captain in the Vid Dragoons, and 0:11.; son of %'icc4sdniiral Frankland, w Mat! , only daughter of Henry Streater Gill, Esq. of Cashiall n u '" in the county of Surrey. P . Dec. 5, a: Matbury Sampford, Charles Lerofm, Est :vs• • Penryn, to Lady Charlotte Strangeways, youngest the late Earl of Ilchester. Dee. ii, at St. Roque rear Edinburgh, George Clerk P.tg. of Dem l .laraie, ASer , ca:e, to Miss Mary Carmichael, secal 3 a daughter of Matinee tkrinichael, Esq. of East-End DIED. At New York, on the 13th Octcbcr, in Ws Slat year, nant-Ccloncl George Turnbull, upwards of dO years in the tish army. Dec. I, atEdinhorgh, I. W. Cray F.trqiihar, }agora en Lieutenant-0110nel Farquhar of Galtnerecrof" At Stanton, Derbyshire, suddenly, Mr. M. Itrial. though he had acruanulated considerable poverty, ronsiltrr u an act or great extravagance to wear a shirt ! Accardirgly, as only induitmi himself in this way twice during the per. " F ' when he attended the ram at Liteltfiehi ami Derby. TO-MORROW. Sun rim Sun sets Moon rises. . 6 mimes after SIS 4 m I minutes *her 3 44 swum after • ----- • HIGH WATER AT LONDON BRIDGE TO•MORROVL Morning . 40 minutes atter AfterEoost LONDON s Printed and published by I,KVEUIChNT , AIL•Orf AC& 8, Tanple•Bar, w 4 No, 1, Cary-Nisei. Chit: of tis sas !shads, sf . r. RoJens. as Iwo Nlarsaessr• d m f 9 &gm' 34 •to left olds ig which rifle tho nunno. ring randerel to smite b r. Roberts b Tee dattb:!:s Roberts kjr reed at the tie • fit rencr Raw co pit the „ I " of I.crnilo•tt was tornshls c !w e .; b1;:i p et landetl• Frog bonce :J 161 d; lonne Chlard't the 2 to Marls ig hists Howe, Esq . • M. a daughter Clerk C: 2 4 l _,s , 4s sceoea re al ...•—••••••••" 6 " .. rear, newt" • rs in the Bs' It tr 'worst O n el ttt who a ;. , f „nsiatred 14 ins corlirgly, ne , the years `& 4 ' • ve ti rifest S u lutes alter moRROVL h suer 4 titer 4 ail ,ht` s at 61 . oases. •