Star. — London, England, 1817-05-31 00:00:00

I-41r 1117 ELL/GENCE. COURT' OF KING'S BENCH, MAY O. STHAHE V. LoVELL. Mr. CHITTY ripen-d the pleadings; and stated that it was an action brou.dit by Mr. D. Stuart, one of the Proriet ,, rs of The l'eurier Newsp per, Against Mr/ Lovell, th. Proprietor of 'the Siatueson Newspaper, kr a libel, riiserted in *Statesman on the 1 Itli 4 A Der,tnher. 1816. The delendant pleaded the general issue. Mr. MAIIISYAT S4id. 11141 the object ot the action on the part 01 Mr. 13. Stuart, one • f the Proprietors of the Courier Newspaper, .was to recover compensa tion from Mr. Lovell. the sole Propriet•tr of the Sratesroan Newspaper, for a gross personal libel, in serted in that pub! cation ; and lie trusted that the Jury would give ample damages to mark their sense of the iojirry. 'rite plaintiff. Mr. Stuart. had been mins , year. a Proprietor of the Outlier Newspaper (having pr.vi iusly been the Proprietor of another Paper), but he never had been Editor. and for some }ears he I:4J had little to do with the management of the piper ; the literary part of which had been altogeti•er lett to the co-proprietor. It was not 're cess ay for him to inquire whether or not there bad been any thing previom.ly published in the Courier, personally directed u g anist Mr. Lovell ? The fact, however, was, neither Mr. Lovell nor the Statesman Newspaper had ever been mentioned in the Courier. It was not for him (Mr. Martial) to conjecture the rear,• s which had induced Mr. L kvell to make this attack "n Mr. Stuart; but it did so happen, that Mr. Loveli t s pus. I i c s. being genet My different from them of Mr. Stuart's paper, he had chosen to make ?dr. Stuart the object not merely ot political but personal attack. Ht- would nut inquire into the propriety of the Editor of one Newspaper CAVliiill.; at the sent'. inents•ut the Editor of another; but unquestionably it. WAS not allowable in any writer in a Newspaper or any other public •tion, to indulge in ,calumny for .he gratification of a private and malignant feeling. whe ther with provocation or without it. In the present instance, however, no provocation whatever had been given by Mr. Stuart's paper to Mr. Lovell. In all societies certain negotiations of conduct were prescri bed, which it behoved the individuals of whom those societies were composed, to observe towards each other. In that Court, it was not permitted to any man to libel the private character ot another. In as semblies of a higher description, it was not permit ted even to name any individual to whose sentiments a reference might be made. The opinion of that in dividual might be freely centroverted, but no personal allusion to - him was ever tolerated. But the Jury would be surprised to hear, not merely that -a per sonal allusion had been made by Mr. Lovell to Mr. Stuart, from the beginning to the end of the article in which was the particular passage for which the present action was brought ; but that' he distinctly accusei Mr. Stuart of having been guilty of a breach of trust, and of the embeastemeot of contiderahle sums of money belonging to a very respectable So. dirty, called the Friends of the People, and of which many high and distinguished persons were members, to which Society Mr. Stuart, twenty-five years ago, was Secretary. Certain .sums of money. subscribed in this Society, bad all been regularly *motioned for; and when the Society teased, the balance had been daily paid over. Yet in the libelloos.article published by Lovell he had accused Mr. Stuart of the embezzlement before adverted to, and had referred to several highly respectable members of the Society as capable of confirming hi; statement. The whole' libel ran through two pages, of which he would read extracts to the Court. Mr. Maniac here read seve ral peuages from the libel; and among them the following s 4.. The Grier Melds handleable every man, sod except the eitweluars of the State, every man's band is lifted against biol. Le sag all other &raki, be has batty taken it into ins kepi to catechise the Lord Mayor rospoeting his Lordship's conduct to Prates and Hooper; the former Secretary and tie latter Tra inee: to the esteem& hodety. Now we recollect, that 74. CAf fie' himself Ailed both these awes to the Society called the Rico& of the People, fa 1753; and if our memory fails' sat, we rather think be had the good fortune to pocket sit or mien handelle pounds of money belonging to the fends of that So. chap. This, se be sure, happened before he betrayed Ida re. tree.; sad. perhaps, fore even his treachery was suspected. Either ot the Lords &thine or Grey could throw much light upon this subjects and it was certainly rtunriered at the time teat tome reps of a keel kind were lb 'agitation, to compel the insuef Tie Carrie to dlegorge the money. Now whatever may be the other sins of Proton and Hooper, we have as heard that they tan be &ailed with betraylog thin el:opium% and seising the dolmen fend." The formal parts of the case being proved— The Right Honourable George Tierney was then :Tells a witness. ELLIABOROUCTI interposed, and said, that if the evidence of this Gentleman was tendered for the purpose of negativing the matters contained in the iel be should not receive it. Had there been a jestication upOn the record then evidence might be admitted on both sides. Mr. MAIHLYIST said that this was not the object he . had in view in'ealling the witness. Mr. Tammy: stated, that he was Treasurer to the Sekinety celled the Friends of the People, of which Mr. Stuart was the Secretary. It was witness's duty to receive subscriptions. He had read , the libellous paragraph three month* since, and be believed it ap plied to the plaintiff. Cross-ezamined—Heithd no doubt that Mr. Stuart, the proprietor of the Courier, was the same person wNo acted as Secretary to , t he Society of Friends of C:e People. . The Libel was then put in and read. A copy of the Statesman of the 15th January last, was then offered in evidence, to spew the spirit with I, which the defendant had traduced the plaintiff's the-' ratter; but Lord Eumioaotran said, be could only receive such evidence, in eases whew the libellous Matter charged was equivocal. . . Mr. Briar was next ezawismi. The plaintiff bad nothing to do with the Stair , / department of the parr. - Witness was the Editor. He had, no doubt in the libel applied to the plaintiff. Lord Giza stated, that be had been a Member of dtetiociety of. -the Fria* of the People. He cthald ape doubt thatthe libel ied wilts plaintiff. , t Here Octave of thef ' tar closed, which was conducted by Mr. Ma . AT, Mr. GININIST, Mr. Cuswoos, and Mr. C . . Mr. Scan= addresetti the Jury in behalf of the, deleadinat.-= 1 Mr. Lovell, tor oboe I appear, bat ilDriad qua me ilea rather were; Imam :La has thought At to remind uric (I wish he had not done so) of the situation in which I stood some years ago ' as his Counsel, when he had the misfortune (for it was N misfortune) of presenting himself in a Court of Justice to claim damages from a Jury for a libel puh 'idled against him by a brother Editor: hr has put into my hand some expressions used by me upon that occasion, which I cannot but regret, because I am of aid he Oinks that the consequence of using them WAS, that the verdict went against him. 'nose ex pressions may be imputed to a want of zeal tor my client--a charge I do not deserve; or to an excessive candour, which, as advocates, we do not, and ought not to admit ; but the effect of theist, he apprehends, was, that the Learned Judge directed, and the Jury found, a verdict against him. Mr. Lovell states, that I said, that if there were any persons who ought to be indifferent to the pub!ications in the daily press it was those who themselves conducted and profited by the operations of that press ; and that it ought in. deed w be a ease of a most extraordinary nature t" justify 'the Editor of a Newspaper in coming into Court to ask damages fora libel upon him. I make no doubt that I said so, because I recollect, that though Mr. Lovell was charged with being the hired agent of the arch-enemy of this country (Bonaparte), yet the Jury thought that he was entitled to no compen sation. I do net know exactly whether lee expects th it I should repeat and enforce that remark upon the present trial; but I should Certainly think it a great reproach upon use, as his Counsel, if I'did nor enforce that position for his defence now which I urged before, and which lost him the verdict as a plaintiff. Indeed, the whole of it may be summed up in a single-line. with which one of my . 'miner friends has furnished me, (tor we before thebar have had time enough to forget our Latin), and on which what I said can be consiJeted only a commentary Quii tuterit Graccaos de sedition title:Vetoes r Who can endure that an Editor of a Newspaper should bring an action for dainves ?—I confess, I have very seldom read the Courier, but Mr. Marryatt Worms us that its politics are raker adverse to those of the Statesman. Probably it is so, and for 014 reason I could not believe that Mr. Stuart, one of the present proprietors of the Courier, was the same Mr. Stuart who Was formerly the Secretary to the Society of the Friends of the People. whose object, if I recol lect, was to, promote a refirm in Parliament, and was not very well disposed towards the Ministers of the day. The witnesses who have sworn to this gen ileman's identity are too distinguished and respect able for me to doubt the fact. Formerly be associa ted with the noble and honourable individuals who have been examined; and formerly he held them to be disinterested - , virtuous, and of the soundest politi cal principles. He has, it seems, of late years altered his opinions in this respect; and does he mean to as sert, that the accusation of this change injures his ho nour and character, and entitles him to come before a Jury for reparation ? If see, in what a deplorable case are halt the Newspapers in the kingdom! Few indeed do not assume this licence, warranted as it has been by examples so notorious. No doubt, Mr. Stuart bad very good reasons for making the &lora tion. The'defendant only says—" You, Mr. Stuart, who formerly sounded your brazen trumpet against Mc. Pitt and his policy, now sound the same trumpet in his praise, call him the heasteu-born Minister, and extol all who tallow and support his system. You accuse the Lord Mayor and the City of London of inconsistency. You say that a certain Address is in consistent with the opinions they expressed two years ago; and how can you take upon yourself to be a reformer of consistency, who have yourself found oc cadon to make such a striking clung:. in your own conduct r—This in reality was the libel, and for this the plaintiff seriously asked for considerable damages. The Lord Mayor has not complained of the law scurrilous language he has indulged in against him ; and why . is the plaintiff to be so sore upon the subject that he cannot rest in his bed under this foul charge of inconsistency I The latter and smaller part of the libel refers to the plaintiff's Secretaryship to the ciety of the Friends of the People ; and it accuses him of improperly putting money into his pocket. I do not think that it necessarily imports a criminal charge, and I hope that you will be of the same opinion, and if I have the good fortune to persuade you so, Mr. Lovell will be entitled to your verdict. I submit that the fair meaning of the paragraph in the News paper called the Statesman is nut to impute any offence. Can it be said, then, that in any way the character of the plaintiff has suffered ? Was it possible that it should suffer. under the circumstances The sale of his concern has not been injured in the slightest do. gree : and we have no reason to think that the circu lation of a Newspapee depends much upon the moral character of its conductor. We judge of works from themselves ;• by their own merits. We hear of wounded feelings. that are to be healed—the wounded feelings of a Newspeper writer 14114 linnet L he not leen a riven perpetually ' dabbling in the press 1 Is he not the Mr. Stuart who was concerned as de fendant in the case which I cited ? Was he not once an advocate for the liberty of the press, which he now seeks to restrain ; and does he not call upon you to ruin a rival Editor, without the possibility of benefit to himself ? His character, if it ever suffered, is me. stored by the admission I have made; and surely he is not one that ought to complain of great delicacy, and nicety of feeling. The Noble and Honourable Persons called on behalf of the plaintiff, I dare say, -never . imagitted that Mr. Stuart was guilty of what is charged - against him ; all others no doubt have for gotten it; and Mr. Stuart, without much forbear ance, I should think, might have slept soundly in the delightful satisfaction of copscious innocence. As to tergiversation, I really could not believe that this was the same man: I could not think it possible, until his own partner assured us that Mr. Stuart of the Courier was. in truth, the Mr. Stuart of the So ciety of " The Friends of the People."- At all events, however, gr. Stuart's system has been the most suc maul j tor, while he has been living in this retire ment of affluence, my upfontosate client has been suf . - tering fur his Consistency in polities most severely. Has Mr. Stuart suffered for his consistency 1 No. lie was more prudent; and the only share he now takes is the labours of his concern Is the counting and cal culating of the profits. Will pm not say then, Gen. 'l som under such ginulateSOCel. that she smiillest; damages — aro sufficient ?—they will testis, boa repo. Luisa. and they will keep "nay client from min. 11*-1 collect the reaps:wive situations of the pardes; and incanher s too, that the Lditior of a Newport "Owl (firm* {alone, on the spar of the moment, and you will not vi.tt it too severe. if he has stepped a•little nut of the right way to say a few words against this Gentleman trf the Courier. The Etitors of Newspa pers ought to exercise great forbearance towards their brethren ; they ought to remember the old maxim " Be to their virtues ever kind, " Be to their faults a little blind." Mr. Stuart must feel that his hen tor and character had not suffered from what Mr. Lovell had published; and he therefore hoped he would be satisfied with their verdict, if they should give it in his lavour, al though it carried the smallest possible damages. Lord Ett.exaortouon, after slating the nature of the proceeding, charged the Jury in the following' terms:—The libel contains matter defamatory of the Plaintiff in two respects: first, with regard to the conduct of the Courier, which it says is politically prostituted, and flaurishing in full-blown baseness and infamy. We will consider this part of the charge a little, before we proceed to the other calumnious matter. Certainly one publisher of a newspaper may comment upon the productions of another, and has ill the rights of free criticism that belang to any other subject of the kingdoms to this liberty Lord Kenyon referred in the case of Herri.a w. Stuart; but an Editor has no privilege to comtuen: on the moral character of another; and when, as in the libel, it is stated that the Courier is prostituted to Al parties, that the Editor is the venerable apostle of tyranny and oppression, 'and that the full-blown baseness of the paper precludes it from all respectable connexions, it oversteps the limits of free and allow ed observation. But there is another part of the libel, upon which the Learned Counsel principally relied, in which the Plaintiff is accused of a breach of a pe cuniary trust, when be was Sectetary or Treasurer 'to the Society of the Friends of the People. Mr. Stuart has given the defendant an opportunity of justoying, by proving the truth of tae alle4ation, which could not have been done had he proceeded criminally. Had it been the fact that the Plaintiff had the goad fortune to pocket six or ‘7OO of the Funds of the Society, the Defendant niglit this day have shewn it. He has not done so, and it must be taken to be unfounded ; and I do not think that it is open to the exalanation attempted to be put upon it, tor it ampuxs to the Plaintiff the receiving of this money, and appropriating it unwarrantably, and in the nature of embezzlement; and it is added, that it aas rumoured at the time, that some steps of a legal kind were in agitation to compel Mr. Stuart to dis r gorge : the very word s dirgorge seems to impute that he had obtained the.rioney improperly ; it is a con tumelious word, and implies that the money had been obtained in some manner criminally punishable. If you think that the plain meaning of the words is, that the Plaintiff had been guilty of a fraud, the pre sent action is maintainable, and the Plaintiff will be entitled to is fair and reasonable measure of damages: what the amount should be I do not pretend to say, since it is a question entirely for your judgment. The Jury consulted for a few minutes, and gave the Plaintiff a verdict, with £l(X) damages. . TM/ KING 9. RICHARDSON. This was an indictinent against a Quaker, for stop ping up a public fait-path titrough a fizld adjoining to the property of a gentleman named hlurgan, re. siding near Starntiod den t in Middlesex. It appeared that the defendant had resorted to various expedient* at different times to stop up the path in question.— Amongst which were, studding the stile with tenter hooks, erecting a hovel at the outlet of the Geld, placing a dunghill at the other end of the path, and, turning a mad bull into the meadow, which last ex periment failed, and the infuriated animal was with difficulty restrained from attacking his employer. A great number of witnesses were called on both sides, but it being clearly proved that the path in question existed beyond the memory of man, the de fendant was found Guilty. Bow-scene.—GAsmiteo.--Yesterday John Fielder was brought before RICHARD IlsaNta, Esq the Sit ting Magistrate, by a summons upon an information laid against him, charging him with keeping a cer tain room in the house No. 9, Bennett-street, St. James's, where an' unlawful game at cards was played, called Bowie et Noir, on the evening of the 50th of April, whereby he bad incurred certain pe nalties, to which he pleaded Not Guilty. Mr. AN. tanswg attended to support the information, and Mr. ALLEY for the defendant. The evidence in support of the information was not called, M* ALLEY taking three objections :—The first was, the parish of St. George, Hanover-square, in which the house No. 9 is situated, and it is the last in the parish, was stated to be in the county of Middlesex only, whereas it ought also to have stated to be in the city of West minster. This was overruled by the Magistrate.— The second was, the date of the year ought to have been in letters or words at length, instead of figures. This was also overruled.—Mr- ALLEY then said, he was driven to . another.objection, which he wished to have avoided, and that was, that the game of Rowse a Noir was not within the meaning of the Statute, to deem it an unlawful , game. This he urged with considerable confidence, not that he wished st to go abroad to the public that the game of Rouge et Noir might be set up and played with impunity as a law ful game; so far from that, he wished all persons concerned in gambling transactions to understand, that they would be liable to be indicted under the Common Law as nuisances.—Mr. ANDREWS, in reply to this, urged that the Act of Henry VIII. under which this information was laid, having used the word " carding," included Whist, Ctibbage, or any game than was played with cards, as illegal.—The Magistrate, on looking into the Act, found that the games which were there described as unlawful, were Faro, Hazard, Bassett, and the Ace of Hearts; and in consequence held that the objection of Mr. Awn. was fatal. and dismissed the information. HATTON GANDIX..-..Yesterday Charles Holam, a shoemaker, was brought up on a warrant, charged by his wile with several acts of cruelty towards ber ; she stated that he neglected his work, and spent his time in public houses, leaving her and her three chil dren at house to starve ; that in the morning whet, became home, after passing the night out, of sire had not something comfortable for him to eat he gave her a thrashing, although be well knew she had nothing herself. That on Sunday last he went out, and did of return 611 early on Wednesday morning, and en because she had nothing for hi s breakfast, he socked bier down,, and kicked her, and on her get tins up again, he knocked her down a second tins. *jib 4 poker, and cut her bead open ; and then on her attetrpting to etcape, he took up a large maker's knife, with which he made an effort to cut her throat, but die put up the infant she held in her arms to rave herself, ana he cut the child's clothe: through to the skin. She t.x .ii,i!ed the marks, which bore testimony of what she advanced. Th e monoer was order •d to find good bad. QULEN-1...10anx —Yesterday two young mer, of very fashionable appearance, were broty,ht i,y Vat St Martin's constables horn the watch-house, charged with having attempted to take by Inter her pia chain from the neck of a Lady at the Opera Home, as well as her ridicule ; and also their watches fr,,rn two Gentlemen. It appeared upon examinition, that on Thursday night the prisoners were at the Masquerade in the character of rubbers, and in that character they acted ; but that their conduct was suspected. and they were given in charge to Laver der, who sent them to the watch-house ; but now it was clearly shewn by some of their friends, Gentle men of respectability, that they mai.ly acted through frolic. They were discharged. MARLBOROUGII•STIizEr.--Yesterday John Set:trool, coachman to Sir William Doniville, was charged on suspicion of stealing selo note, the property of a young man, servant to Colonel Richardson, of Craw ford-street, He was discharged fur mint of proof. SiriouLAn CASE.—About one o'clock, Mr. Thoma Heath, of James -street, Gclden-square, brought a man, named 719 mas „taw, to this Uflice, whom he found in the cock-loft of his coach house, between the cirling and the tiles. On examination, the prisoner Acknowledged having been in this dreary situation fur twelve months, emerging occasionally from hi s concealments he had a truss of straw in it to :t•ep upon, and, what was very singular, no one knev. t h e least of his abode. When taken into custody he was found mending his clothes. The Magistrate desired him to be passed to his parish. Thursday evening, the wile of Dr. Watsov, now under charges of high treason in the Tower, was de livered of a son, being their eight!, child now livinr. CILZAr NVTKiMENT• —A Munich Gazette in.eris the Itejurt made. by Baron ir.f.n. it lAat., On the preparatioti u. the jelly of bones in large kettles in a new conAructioo It results, from :Le experiments 11 1 / 4 1e VD !his subject, that by to►ing only a litlaCtr of the bones atisirg trim' the anneal consumptiou ut suet in Ihr capital ut Bavaria, there may be procui hunt ditto 3 tit jelly, and 5: 1 0 cart. tit fat. Estimated u thelowtst price, tear feud oil( be worth 254,000 'forint. Ike l sfy cwt. ut jllty fu.aukh 7,644,1mU portions of ►sup in a year. that pignut' dal) , to tt opt 4 poor. It world b: difficult to Lod a cheaper Neil. NEW GATE AND L.E4DENtI.tI.I., NIAICIII. la , M.ty zU. (By the t'atcase.). Beef. per stone Ss 4.1 to is 4d I Veil Si GI to Ss 01 Atoll O- &I to 4. W. I Pork 3. s.l to 4s r 4 I.3nab 4s. W. to ss• OA. COUN MARKI. I'd. Uisaittor, May 29.—Wheat per load, £ll Oa. to £37 00 • New ditto. lAA Coo. t.l M.N. Barley, per quarter tea :o Oats 27s to 45e. Beans 41% to 66.. 014 Belot OW. to tie.. Peas ass to 00•. Roe 00s to 00s. 0 May e 9.— rite Price of a boshel of wheat 1 is. 104. Price of the Quartern Loaf, wheaten, BA al BUILT, Mal _9.—Wheat 011.6 d. to las.o.la bustle!. Flour 901. per rack. Bread 9s. 94. the half peck. COAL MART E r, MAY 30. Ships= Market. Ships fold. Petra. V.:. Newcaole V7i &N. Rd. to 445 3d. S Sunderland 4 35.. til 15 to Vol. tl.l. rat ICE UP MCI Rank Stock, 2341154. 3 per Ct. Red. 7!* 3 per Ct. Cons. 714 73 74 per Cent. 891 90 S per C. Navy 1041105111 I Lung Anne. 1311 'Ks YES I'EMMY. India Stock 219# n s India ItotaJs 79 50 pr. Exch. Halt (Y id.) 8 lu pr. Cont. for Ace. 73 ft Lottery Tickets £lB. MARRIED. At Weenies, in Lancashire, on the 27th inst. by the Rev. John Sunderland, North Dalrymple, Esq. Capti!n 3th IJEkt Dragoons, second son of the late Slr John If. bsv. baron of Exchequer in Scotland, to Margaret, youngest daiigt.- ter of the late James Penny, Esq. of Liverpool At Ula.gow, the Rev. John NPKinlay, to Helen, daughter of the late Mr. crew, Kilsyth. I.ately, at Radsconeel Church, the Rev. Win. GrcgaiT, t 7 Muse, third daughter of the lace Sir COOrlee Levingr. May 1.5, at Waterfall, county of Cork, COMM 11/I'N TOION Of TOOMOOd, to Mary, third daughter of llamas Austin, E 1.,. of Waterfall, in the county of Cork. DIED. The 29th Instant, in Charlotiv-stnet, Portland-plase, Frrec.•', Infant daughter of Robert Johnson, Esq. of binbrook, in the County of Lincoln. La►t week, at an advanced age, Mn. Noble, of Enniskalet, relict of the Rev. M. Noble, formerly Master of Portera Schee» It is universally acknowledged. by the most respec table part of the profession, that the Medical L' parole, estah halted by the celebrated Surgeons of Charlotte Howie, Blacktri.:s Road, and Woodstock street, Oshird-or.et (a few doors fr o nt Hood-street), are the fountain head for advice. It is a lam, that, by the ni..ted talents of these Gentlemen, upward+ of Six 'floc sand Patients have been cared an.tually of obstinate Disea-m; many of whom had been discharged from Hospitals, and Lee dyed* had been improperly treated sty persons ignorant of as im portant branch of the profession.—Melsrs. Court's, Mina r, and Co. are conaultei daily by all ranks of people, at each of the P.siablishments; or by letters from the Country, staling their case, when Medicine and Advice are vent to all ports of eie K ingdom—There are side-doors at each house, and private rooms tor females.—. Direct Charlotte House, apposite the Rev. R tun aiipel; or Woodstoci House, near :slew Rend street. tit aom Luxury and llibsopattina the mind hec.,nnts enervated, and the body soon falls an easy victim. To re- Move the Disorders arising trona fashionable gaieties and to restore the debilitated constitution is.rbe result of our study and expert" ester, and we trust that thirty years' successful praciice in this 'peculiar branch of our profession gives us a decided surerionty over every other Practitioner. In recent cases of Syphiliiie don, a perfect cure is completed hi t h e short period ut (wader, and in those cases of a more complicated nature, where ether practitioners have failed of success, a pr.per perstverauce in our plan of treatment ensures no the Patient a suot.d and i•trfert re establishment. To those who are labouring under a vneral nor local Debility, it will be consolatory to know, that the :ileitickes we prescribe possess the inestimable power of rentivring themes: debilitated Constitution, whether it arises from the heliscrelees of youth, or by a residence in hot or unhealthy climatest!io oar*. city a life, or too close an application to study, excessive Users t. judicious use of mercury, fie. or should it procettl !rum an :tab!. teal tendency to ennrurnption, these our restoratives w:ll;m“Lece the happiest effects. in place of Lassitude and lie;M:ty, We at lasting Health, Strength, and spirits; and even to the aced a l infirm our plan of treatnitut will afford relief and cututort, gently and safely invigorating :he system. Numerous cases of Strictures have been, end are daily ends our care, the total eradication of which is effected by a sate, er lain, and expeditious mode of practice, superior to any u her sa d he weakness, relaxation, and debility prise-431ms; wits this complaint are speedily removed, and the L . Aleut 1 ebtUf ad 1 sound and vigorous health. llatten , t a ti s ol ,d etcher Se , a s t ma ou y t consulthouoe Nn . 107, t e oa a greatest delicacy r dea Patients in the Cueutry, describing their case, and eticlusili a remittance for Advice and Medicines. the same will be sent :a &Lipari& of the world. CU ARLIE and Surge.ms, No. 107, Hattou Liar yr-. H tsti WA ruit TO MORROW A r LoNvom Mornutg • t 7 nun a kfterou.ta . . LONDON s Mated end published by Leval KsaT, Y ~ ''' • klacc, .