Star. — London, England, 1823-12-25 00:00:00

SIR GREGOR, PAGE TURNER. -1..- The judgments which have been obtained against the est ate of this lunatic, within the last two years, are enor mous. Several executions have been in progress since last Term —some for articles of necessity, others fol. & i ns ides, such as minerals, china, &c. One of the wr i t s, by virtue of which• Sir. Gregory is now detained, ;s ti ff a debt contracted for a sop , of white Intel brown Aa r . The judgments obtained at the suit of Sir Wil loam Rawlins alone, since Hilary Tenn, 1821, are eas ily more than the produce of the estate, even united with the income arising from the money in the funds. In t heyear MI, he sued out judgments to an immense anim a, all of which have been satisfied. At the suit o f t h e same party, a judgment was obtained last Easter T erm for 00 less than 5i!2,0001. There are other judg ments to various persons, which amount to a vast sum. Th e present income of Sir Gregory is abo u t . l2,oool. a !ear. During the life Of.his father the income amounted to 16,0 a year. But a peat part a the income was 001. 'eviveti from money in the Funds, which was invested in boded securities i by Sir Gregory, and reduced tlw income to about 12,000/. a year.' LAW INitI:4LIGENVE. COURT OF KING'S BENCH, DECEMBER 24. UNSKILFUL NAVIGATION. WEST V. STORY. Mr. GURNEY stated, that this was an action by the plaintiff for damage done to two boats by the defendant's b r ig, the Swift, occasioned by thenegligent and unskilful navigation of the defendant's servants or mariners, in Barking Creek, River Thames. The defendant had put i n several pleas:—First, that his ship did not do the damage, next, that it was the fault of defendant's boat's crew; and lastly, that it was another ship. Now, said the Learned Gentleman, there was one particular circum stance spoke against the defendant's Captain more than volumes of evidence, this was, when asked for.his name, and the name of the ship, he said he "'would not tell, he'd see them d—d first ;" for in all cases where a party had done damage to the property. _of another, and re fused to give his name or address, be was invariably held to have thereby given damning evidence against himself. The damages 'were between 301. and 401. Philip Bright deposed to having been sent with these boats laden with potatoes, they were moored in the river, near Barking, when the accident happened. Charks Rogers is what is called a ship's bobber; saw the boats moored to the buoy. Saw one boat sink just as the ship, a collier, passed ; the other boat was also struck in the morning of the 10th. The collier, which struck the boats, then went ashore just above Tripcock trees; on the Kentish shore ; but dint sure it was the same that struck the . boats. There were 'several other colliers went down afore that. Thomas Hill is a fisherman; was out fishing and asleep ; he was as oke about three in the morning; saw a collier coming down the river, stretching within the. buoys, and heaving about ; she then stretched her sails and went against the boats: stove one boat about three planks down; witness never lost sight of 'the col lier fur a moment, till she stretched on the opposite side and got on shore; one of the boats, laden with tdoes,.w as .sunk; witness afterwards pointed out the {hip to Mr. West; the brig's stern struck the boat ; she had pretty good way at the time her . saiis were full. ip ?it n Hilt . saw the collier go about. and then ran e boats and cut them down; they were quite safe ore; a few sacks of potatoes were saved ; witness afterwards went twice on board with Mr. West ; saw the Caprain, and asked his name, which he denied ; witness went on shore for an officer, and when he came back with a Gentleman (Mr. Curtis); he again refused . to give his name; then went to the stem. and found the name "Swift, Newcastle," on the boat;_ found the name "Robert Potts;" witness and others jiad.lss. among them for their assistance. Sits&alma/T.—You had received the last of the fifteen shillings in grog, before you_went on board ? Alt, no, Sir—{Laughter).—You threatened you'd take the Captain ashore?—Ah, no, Sir.—You were pot-va liant, were you ?—Ats, no, Sir.—The Captain did not say about not touching the potatoes. - • John Thompson corroborated the former witnesses, as to the accident being caused by the defendant's brig. William Curtis, foreman of the powder magazine near Barking, was asked by the plaintiff to go on board the collier, when they demanded the Ciptain's name, which be refused giving. Went round and took the names stated. The fi hermen were not intosticated; is not an nicer; never offered to take the Captain ashore, • Webb, a bciat.builder, repaired Webb's boats; charged, •agiAauruernan's wages, IL 15s. W sward Feuwick is a dealer in rntatoes • pcirehtsed time twelve sacks at 3s. Gd. a sack ;if Sound, they were worth from 41. 651. per ton, Mr. Sok/mini, for .the defendant, observed, if his client had not been satisfied that his ship was -not the /etssel.that did the damage. hemas sensible it would have_ been better for him to have paid theslaintirs demand. twice over gather than. to pay the expense of bringing. himself and witnesses from the distance. of Newcastle.. Several witnesses belonging to the Swift were: we . mined ; who swort.they went. ten feet cleat of the boats,. Thomas Stopport, the Captain of the Swill, deposed., to a great swell in the river—about fifty or sixty sail, passed before them. Saw the boats as they approached them, and perceived a great deal of water in the boats, se that the accident must have been occasioned by slime other vessel... When plaintiff and his men threatened to take witness out of his ship, witness said no two men in Barking should take him out of his ship. ‘Vhen wit. T.lessis nam e was d eman d ed, re f erre d to t h e b oat ' s stern . Witness's name is not Robert Potts, but that was the tame on the boat's. stern. Ths witness, Carter, put opt hie kg to try to touch the boat, but could not. 1114, LORD CUM JUSTICZ—That proves that they ztuKiave been very near. All .the witnesses for the defendant distinctly s wore t hat the Swift never touched The beats.—Verdict for plaintiff, Damages £l9 and costs. ROBERTSON V. TATTIIRSALL. Mr. SCARLET? said this was an action brought against The defthdant for money bad and received. The name 'al the defendant was well known- at the West end of the !own and in the sporting circles. The sum saught to be recovered was seventy guineas ) which the plaintiff Paid to the defendant for a horse, which turned out to be Larne and unsound at the time it was sold. Mr. ra' meson happened to want a pair of-carriage-horses, and hilattention was directed to an advertisement in the Timer of the 23d of August, which published the sale of the horses of a Nobleman who had left the country. "Lheoses we,e descaibed to hare a brilliant manner ul fOilltg s and to be fit for immediate use. Mr.liubertson it 4 tatied at the sale, and bought lot the first ui the horses, which was called Lofty. rim: this he paid 70 guineas.' When lot the second 41 tb.ejtioses.. Highflyer, rose to a very biglr price, Mr. Robertsoo,,who. bought the fir't, with a view of having it as a match for the second, dent so high as CM. It. was subsequently, however,booVit in for £2OO. • It appeared that the horses were left at Tattersall's for sale, by Prince Eiterhazy. The Learned Counsel contended that the bargaitishould be rescinded on two grounds : first, on the ground that the horse was lame and unsound at . the time of sale, and did not cor respond to the description of the advertisement: • The sale of the second horse, which was a good one, was only advertised as an inducement or decoy to get rid of the other, but was not to be sold ; and the sale should therefore be regarded as a fraudulent one. Mr. Scarlett having called hii witnesses, • Mr. GURNEY contended, that there was no case to go to the Jury, as there was nawarranty of the horse given. On the contrary, such warranty was refused. As to the advertisement, it was not put in by Prince Esterhazy, and the Messrs. Tattersall should not be made respon sible for it, although the warfanty were proved. In the, case in Cooper's Reports it was decided, that in such case the action should be brought on the warranty, and not for money " had and received." The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE said, he would not nonsuit the plaintiff on that ground. Mr. GURNEY complained that his clients had not been fairly dealt with, by the manner in which this ac tion was brought.' By bringing this action against Messri. Tattersall, instead of Prince Esterhazy, they were made defendants, and thereby their lips sealed 4 .from an opportunity of giving evidence as to the con- 1 ditions on which they were directed to sell the horses. The Learned Counsel relied strongly on the refusal of warranty, which he contended debarred a right of ac tion fQr any subsequent lameness or accident that might afterwards befal the horse. As to the charge of fraud, not a shadow of evidence was given to sustain it. The LORD CHIEF JUSTICE, in summing up, said that this action was brought nominally against the Messrt. Tattersall, but virtually against the Prince Esterhazy, or, more probably, some person acting for him, and - who may have the charge of that department of his establishment. There was a general rule applicable to auction sales—if the money was not paid..within three days after the purchase,. the right to bring an action did not exist. That rule did net debar the plaintiff here, for the money was paid the day after the purchase. There was no proof of warranty, but that question would not arise, from the planner in which he should put the case to the Jury. Neither would he attach much weight to the advertisement ; but the simple question for the Jury to decide would be, whether trick or de ceit was practised, in the manner in which the good horse was put up for sale, and afterwards bought in, or was it a bona fade faira.ale? If they came to the former conclusion, their verdict should be for the plaintiff; if the latter, for the defendant. The Jury retired for a few minutes, and returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Sittings adjourned to the sth of January. PALACE COURT, DECEMBER 24. WELSH Vs BENZAOUEN. Mr. ERLE stated, that the plaintiff in this case was an eminent surgeon, and brought his action against the de fendant, a foreign merchant, to recover the small sum. of two guineas, for'his attendance, in curing the defen dant's daughter. of 4 dislocation of the elbow. Mr. Henry Lloyd, assistant to Mr. Welsh, staiesii, be remembered the infant being brought to their house, having met with an accident, and dislocated the elbow. The child was nine months old, and it was a case that required great medical skill.; and Mr.Welth being from home, the servant waited his return, when he immedi ately set it rig* and bandaged the arm, giving a lo tion at the same time. The defendant called himself in 'the evening, thanked the plaintiff for his attention, left his card, and requested him to call next day; but wit ness did not know whether he did or not. Joseph Rine, then a servant to Mr. Welsh, proved driving his master two or three times to ihedefendant's house, in the Hackney-road. It 'was• a most respect. able house. . . . • Sir William Blizard being sworn, stated, the plaintiff bad been a pupil of his, and that he was a Member of the Royal College of Surgeons: He his no doubt of his skill, from his attendance in the hospital. Helsas heard the evidence, and unquestionably thinks the, charge moderate. No.apothecary would attempt the 'operation, as it required the skilful hand of a surgeon:- . The defence set tiVirtrifthat the child's arm was only ;sprained, and not dislocated, and that- 'the charge was fremoderate, to support which; - 'Elizabeth Spier:, she: nurse of the child, stated, she was walking:with the infant in the pirlour, when, on As picking Up siiinething, it hurt its min, and screamed.; she told her Mistress, whe desired her to go to Pr.- :Cockle, but he-being horn-home, she carried, it to Mr. Nelsh ; he looked at , the' efant's arm, and put it in irlace, and told' her hol to be alarmed, - as- it was only sprained, and there irai ntidaoger. 'Mr. E. Cockle, surgeon, attends the family of the idefendant : saw the arm of the.infant next day aeci ti ' entally ; thotight there.was no dislocation—[he hire tered into an explanation of professional appeal noes fter dislocation)—and in his opinion there. sus ii isik4is ocation in that instance. .. , li.. . i . . Sir William Blizard being again ailtecl a Viti; 'loitas impossible for any one to say, after twenty 7 folitflionrs; whether a dislocaiion had. taken place Oi . 'noi, if it had been properly treated. -, • . . ... . , . The Learned Junes then summed. pp e+.4 and the Jury, without the slightest liesioo 040 .a • verdict fur the plaintiff—Damagekt* s ri.' . . s i -. 0? _ . INSOLVENT DEBTORS' COURT; DIicEMBER 14. William' Thomas Braskier, was opposed by. -Mr. tHICATH for Mr. Poole, of Everett-street, Kr.'iones4. of Devonshire-street, and Mr. Geddes, of'Oreat Ormond; street, all tailors, iith whom the insolvent keoetracted debts, n the course of a few days, to the mown of IT7I. The inn.: vent, who desei ibed himself as formerly of Lamb's Conduit-street, journeyman fishmonger ; then of Rotterdam, in the protonic: of Holland, iridium*. and thee of Chancery-lane, Leaden, gentleman: tkat he had bees" ti - inernerwan to Mr, monger, in Lamb's Condaiki•strbeiti eeived a salary of 201. e• when he eontr.actid the ditors. He had ,soadasir came a Geotlemau in L able- • boor-makir !married to Mr. Lirtkity:• 'isaidao of Dairaot, Wm *ass 4:3•lttietnitn, 'it olighe be, .11,atairyiag 4 Drummond Smith. HeitElomitt)Ajvatralpidita Castle-street, Eirmiburi-equare; asherotimoontlik .business of a tailor ; but ha wan . 4 041601 *Pe: obliged to compromise his debts with tratorsiaftt+l which be also became aiGentleman and went to Hot-', land to live on the pfopert y his ; •llis creditors were unable to toech this proPerty,:asti`Oanthstbit lieved," 150( .' * year. This'was th e person . cfaceelto his opposing creditors.. He *Stained CictOtis of them for him to the amount of 561.• for which littio solvent)' was responsible. This was in -March, 1821. About the same time he procured clothes for himself to the amount of about 801. He also purchased a piano forte, a gold watch, and a silver mug and cup. 'He paid for the latter, and the formeeWas returned to the seller. He gave the plate to his uncle in discharge of an obligatiop. He went to Holland in March, 1821. While there he resided' at N0:32, Bolton-quay, Roues .dam. His object in . taking that journey was to get a 'situation at Hamburgh; but the house in which be ex pected to obtain it tailed, and he therefore returned to London. He had no interest whatever in the fish monger's-shopin Lamb's Conduit-street. Jonathan Jones stated, that about the Si of March last year, the insolvent and Durant called on him, and , 'requested he would go to his (insolvent's) house. Wit ness went accordingly, and the insolvent told hint he had been introduced to him by some of witness's cus tomers, none of whom, however, he could name.. He gave an order for himself and Durant, which witness,• conceiving hiM to be a tradesman of repute, took. 'Aw l order was for firif-rate clothes. Amongst other article there was a great coat ordered of the best cloth, finest pearl buttons, collar and cuffs to be covered with fur, and the coat to be lined throughout with silk. The order was ready money terms, and the charges were accordingly. When the clothes were taken home, the insolvent said he wanted a suit of black, which he mdst have by thefollowing day, and he would then pay for the whole together. He had not paid for them since. He represented • Durant to be a Gentleman of fortune. Had witness_ known he had been a broken down tailor, he would not hive made any clothes for him. Alexander Geddies said, that the insolvent had been his near neighbour, and suppOsed to be one of the pro prietors of the splendid fishitsonger's shop in Lamb's Conduit-street; he in every respect used to act as such. He sent for witness in March last, to give him an order ; when witness went to him, he saw Mr.-Jones there. Witness Welt away,' aad returned again. He then asked if that was not Mr. Imes, of Devonshire street, whom he had seen there? The i n solvent said " it WM, he had called because he heard I had an ex tensive order, but I did not employ him, because his cut was not so fashionable as• - yottes." So convinced was witness that the shop belonged to the insolvent, that he would not nowtake 10s. in the pound for his claim. James Poole stated, that he had known the insolvent; lie had complimented witness, on one Occasion, ttlxin his smart cut, and told him that " as he had been his customer for fish, he would give him a turn by an order for clothes." He did accordingly order clothes, of him to the amount of £l7 15s. Witness gave him' the clothes, and would have given him credit for £lOO worth, as the reputed proprietor cg . as handsome a fish onger's shop a; any in London. The insolvent, when examined in explanation, denied . that he had promised to pay Mr. Jones ready money; er that he had ever, exercised 'any authhrity in this shop. His only reason for going to so many tailors was, because he was apprehensive-that one would not sypply lairdwith the quantity he requited to equip hint for going abroad. Mr..He.a.xu, on behalf otthe opposing creditors, ad-, dressed the Court at some length, and observed upon the fraudulent conduct of the insolvent in contracti4 debts Under an assumed appearance of respectability ; like other fishermen, he had cast out his net, but unfor tunately he drew in a shoal of tailors, and managed to hook and gull them'all. It was a melancholy thing to see'a yourtg math - who 'had respectable connections, in such a situation; .but he had reason to be 'thankful that' he was not standing .= another bar, oh a more serious charge. The Courf, hoWever t would teach him a salts lesson, by pronouncing stiCh a judgmeut 'as the justice a the case required, ' t ?qr. Cooxg, oit behayaftthe - insolvent,AcknoWledged .• that he could Mt reottt the case made oat against him, but the Court would take into its consideration as some mitigation, that be had not gone deeply, into debt ; he had sot, as he might have' done, 'in Ur expahtled his net, as to draw in tradesmen of every deseription.. • The Cotner, in giving judgment, thopght it unneces sary to go into the details of this ca 4, where the' evi dence was uncontradicted, except by the insdivent, whose manner of conducting himself in Court did not render him deserving . of much consideration: Instead of evincing some contrition for his misconduct, he brdy.. appeared determined to carry it off with a spirit of bra very. A clear ciala or fraudulently contracting debts had been established against him, for „which the jitclg-;', me= of the court was, that he be remanded fora pe!' riod'of tvielet eatendar 'Months. and confined 'Within the walls Ortfie inison, and . iut Within the rules or liberties thEreofi . . . . . .1 R. Lewit t Esq.. of LOng-parish House, Hants, has, a.ccosditigto annual custom, killed a-fine fat or, which, s:in this clay,is distributed among.the poor families who reside/in the vicinity. ofisis hospitable mansion. - , Saturday, while the &ring Millet the •Manstfactory of Mr. R. Wilson, engine-buildery of Forth-street, in Newcastle, was at work; a man - of the name of John. Lindsey, unfcirtunately . got histeft arm entangled in the methinett: In attempting to extricate it, his right hand was ales iruSbed.. HiIIOINK with all possible expedition . to -the • 'abatis? Oar . .patical Mildew,. when the arm !Jai itasiimatette.: ! : ,••••.r , b , 'I .;,..: - .; •;____,. 4 _.,.. T .... ' eil euSltil A a ' D oi% pru ! ... 0 . sic h ouse keepers in 'an& around the metititiplik . 4o :F,,utioned against a set of *ten who go . abqsia. iii:* Amused character of Bow street Patrol, soliciting Chrisunas flogis: •It Is proper Fest that it should belteowe meek persons ore • ' ors, and that the Bow -street, Berl are - tti4ctly -. ' +led ft oat MUciting, Pbcialmisa lkitik,, 3441 _4,4 • l ife to be dis ped• .4 1. 0! 4 1 1a!'°/ - ti ( l4o:k i t9ra l hat the,: 4 4 ' ' A t lhe."!_ratirli 4604 11 4, e ' • 04 ) " , t e9 - - *vim ' • ; 1 , S Di son Gibson I . , ti 4 • .: e rim ARMY. - A detachment of the 34th- (or Cumberland) Regiment of Poot, arrived on Tuesday at Windsor, from Woolwich. A detachment, belefilceis'and Retroirs bilongtng to the 94th (now raising) ReidMet* of Infantry. A ordel:ed to embark, on Sundry, on boald• Leith, &e. itnseke,ln thc , river, for the purpo s e of bring conveyed to Gbtsgeittir, *here the Ilead-quattenr of the above Corps, is atisesetit to be stationed: .itT ELECH(SP faiepiatmoiv • -. t Yesterday the Election-of Members of the 6,, Par liament in the contested Wards finally concluded:kme little bickering took -place in one Ward, where - a new Candidate was introdoced-to the exclusion of an old - Member; but we hope; 4 as . the congest is now diaided, amity will be restored ' , and that 4 iticie- will' lie 'met ;with moderation on the ctne side ' acid defeat - 6m* with . ;out asperity on ttie o thers night ikon or TIM TOT.LII4O : ' a . 4 (Those marked thus [a) errefreals Camblataks.) . 4/1 A • 1 - . 615 Southyriter .; .46:.?,:11..1;d1 458 - 496 Taylor , -4-.....-44 45$ 481 Figgans -0., , '4.11/C 444 ,Hansarul .- .• .' .1191 430 Turner . -‘ 423 Palm • . ' -44 ' sue 411 . 71‘ a Butterworth .1 582 Galloway .- . '-- ' 378 ,Reeves `Vale - Black et - -- -_ Savage - " 47 1^1 Crook - - 477 *Griffith - • - '479' 143eekwith - • " 471 !Young - •• - 49 tohetta -- - 459 1 : The firebnamed I 4 BREAD-ST R -Hayward (Deputy) : - . Si Nat hie - - • 51 Burra .; - . SI Coleman - -. 49 a Legg - - - ' 49 Gibson - - 48 Blakcsley • 16 were returned. .RET WARD. [fridge S 4T - 47 Crocker - 46 De Grate • - 44 Bidtlett ' • e‘ •- - • 4 3 alistaietw# •• aa Imo' is .•• r . weie dotted. The fitst ii LANGUOR - 137 - 143 - 143 ▪ - . 146 -rls - 141. , a - 136 • The first 19'were eleoted. tIitiPPLIGATE - WITHIN.--..litturns 8. • Ken ' 6 ▪ • - 129 I a G}te! • . - 88 Waterhouse - - 1 . 15 Hearog - 97 Field - - 113 Smith . - 83 Wilshire - I 1 1 Capel - ' - 75, Forsyth - 107 a Thoragood - - 44 The first eight were electecl. NE' Width. Elliot - Ayres - Stubbing Rice -••-• .. 122 .4 Haswell- 110: a Layton - • . 109 Joyce . -•93 a Stuart - 70 a UnWia • • - 44 WESTMINSTER COURT OF REQUESTS. cteiiimisassr, *acamiiits .'.' • ----."--- MAPIAT v. TKOMAs.—The plaintiff is a retail dealer in • 'cOalkind defendant, Thomas, had been for some time a - tititotber of his', and had - purchased divers bushels and hilfbbshels of black dianadnds at his shed,. for whiCh he kept a running account, paying as it suited hins'and for some time both parties were mutually satisfied; -when one fine November morning Mapley discovered,. upon opening his shiap and his eyes at the same time,. that 'homes had traitirood opened•thop against him, and was measuring away to Mapley's rightful customers the best Walls End, itt4 pike something belovi his, and this'foo without havingdearethie account, being then indebted to him in the amount of 121. 41 This, it must be allowed, was altogether a black bmiiness, and., its might be expected, Mapley marched up to hit Sip Pia-: bent, and civilly (0 he said) asked for hii own; but Thomas most uncivilly refused, lie would neither givr . it to him kindly, nor return it in kind, and the plaintiff, therefore, threatened, to go to law with him in the Olson Iry Conscience; and he now, having put . that threat in isecution, came to enforce his claim. • The debt was not disputed, nor the opening against him denied, but • overt, was pleaded, and•ttine requested for permeate but the Court, thinking it bard that a man should be ivposed in his business, and kept out his money at the same time, ordered it to be paid forthwith. MIATON it Ntoin.tut.—This was a suit to recover the; sum of 11125.1 1 d.for *milk score ;Abe plaintiff appeared' jn person ; but the defendant by prosy, sending by his , locum semen a note, by which it appeared that the debt was not disputed, but that the milk was too Much like• what the criers of it generally call it, as if•in nibeicery, "14 bus" or half water; or, as poor Bloomfield eon.; temptuously called the Suffolk milk, " three tinkirshist , ',led - sky blue;" for the note, after praying for time," concluded in something like these words, " Now,•Gen roemen, with yespect to Mr. Meaton's milk, as he pleases term it, I do protest that, on some occasions it was so blue, that it must have been greatly adulte rated." Under these circumstances, the COURT awarded ithe plaintiff his demand, but gave the defendant the time he prayed to pay- it in. ‘ Law V. SMEDLEY.—The plaintiff was an Israelite, and "demanded of Mr. Smedley the sum of 11.ds.earned_by Ibis son, a pale, meek-looking, diminutive. boy, under he following circumstances. Levi- the Less, knOwing - something of the tayloring business, - and never being )ikely to become more than the ninth part of a Man, Was to be apprenticed to Mr. Sinedley, who was a knight pf the needle and sheeis, upon these terms, via. he was to have Is. 64.. a week, for the first year,•and his tea in the morning end afternoon ;.but for the satisfaction bf both parties, he was to go for some time on- liking, his pay to commence immediately. Tor two and twenty weeks young. : Levi winked his fingers to the bone, 'and did all that such a tyro could - slO ; ipoo- - peared that he even went 'as. far as the potting together pf two pair of Cossack trowsers, and he had even made Some progress in working a button-how, thit ac of perfection in the art and mystety of tayloring. But all . this while no mote money was forthembingehatt +161.1111M. ead of 1/. ids. which should have been bk , " and 1 s e taylor havingtorned the boy arajr,..ts now crooned for the diffeeacf, 11. es. MG, was • ked if he could refute the charge; and the decorator . men made several iiiinsresoesetirsifhttlaiiefais twisty evident hie" poverty arid isetUsWilkiiitieitedr: but as he had nothing like asobstasedikklefibeet the Mini 'lninsediedeir." iliamiuniimiesii * Ostyak 103 pd toils Wilily/ eigr".lsi.2l ;? ria L .; - roVince of Holland, fienuerearr; i. , - ...,_ _-- -- - ~.• - - , ,__,_ ,_ ..,__, ___ ,_ . • ad 1 1 :i atie, Lead* gendeaue; stared , .sise. _ Eltf 497,115ffittio AP! 'ye! Ft - ,19 1 _ ' 1 ! missioners order mto pardOriSiAlitisteModihiliy.A =merlon se gii: b ec t e . j. ,fi r h. hi . ( "44e11141!)11. l4 O O. _l4! le_Allia. morning . .e1.9 1 5w0 ... . ,• .: •_ • • • .: ._ A _ oki,‘,44.wii .01 '005,&,....11 adwii44ol44 frinn wheel he re; v usmesoiam,All.4.94:tilromr4P/•ll o l l 4,Priliedt !-., , . • . •-. . fl; Jirityi but ct IA :Ity. s' • H - • tr i At i t es t arrees. l behind dye 4 0 0. 1 .10. Ne• *Me*** the colliecthtmr. 1 ) The Uoiyersity of Coen $101.41,...00110r, 1! year. &PON inchat at on liktiassiettr optmogJas yoi4l,‘ Oil, - . . lerd Gamma. • 4 061 411 utfi . .brd - a . - e deb* with his oi)posing Air*. imes biers a Chintiensam ',He be. / *511 "?"'W( 04 " 1"?.1111- ‘ 1 " 3 " .°112 ' tiaj; e r t ' 4am " . r io s o re. W : l 44r" •- r • •. • , i. ., .4. -_ 44 t. ~7 . • :Ad& Me 'Ott -• . 4017 - . 1 . 3 Moe midobt a rse . I r ,, 1.892; .Ma faierwas or respect• ..__ . 4 , 46,:‘ 4 . _ 6 ., 6 1114161140 . - k i • , u i l l iieidedi ' Nisneerpleae, iiad hiesisser vies 'Tent"' suPPIY ‘ ,7 . 1..Egii.,... , A! ; Lil a,' i t ..,.. ~.. ~ imasetriaix-lairairil od vain 6 171.11 . 4 1,0 391 e ns* ef . ~,_ ,____.. l .. .. ~.,,,,,„A „ ..; , .t ale they were enables.. • .. 1 .-- - e mama Da .,ii ss i.:6ll.o 7 . at i e• rzardegatatirocsa jedgetosumeithios was .. a - z3 n e _ror en v ies ! 7 rr ie v i z ata ,mucipmbilslitives ocoa , ....wt.:4 ••• L.:4'J LI E 0 : c 1 . 61Velli1111114Chillit4414 , g ; SIMILIVITAKIIIIMttIieIii 1 . fresiai g"l 4j or MOAdbfj tvoomyoung asallgolh‘h Maga romdlaileas WA** *morns - 4:1,w eshiefigadet lieiaflieaetrij;edial sstie tie* ik: I,lBrovinc 'walk WaNntaii'lließdinb 4lo B l K ., •bria o i .. illiribiteililltii4ltliFelllllBlllll4ol3 : 1 1 1 notlikAibialial4 .uar eibuldiresa idu i d , e ifJoidoiorii to bo oii•Ooted Amid* ladviof; , . Leogig e au mmo i merii iiik do i s i tetw a s.. 1,.., h. Ai . 4 041ismi NOW : 'aillii• hir tallisAiroaking ea& dyad , L s 01) it i: 1i " Lord . il4 aid tab ill My es."".f. - .. A ; nit , •..