Star. — London, England, 1810-03-03 00:00:00

sibility, therefore, attached to that advice, his Ma jesty's Ministers did not shrink; they here. pleaded guilty to the charge. But without now entering into the merits or demerits of the Expedition, for the dis cussion of which there would be ether opportunities, he should content himself with observing that the DISTILLERIES. 1 comparison made by the Noble Marquis between the On the Order of the Day being moved for the Home to go 1 two events, of the Expedition to the Scheldt and the Into a Committee on the Bill to prevent Distilling of Spirits • Convention of Cintra was not just ; an 4 that the fai from Corn, 45:.c. lure of the Expedition to the Scheldt arose from one Lord HARDWICK rose to move the Amendment, of which he had given notice on a former day. From all the infcrrmation chief cause—a departure from the original plan laid which he had been able to obtain upon the suhject, he was led to down for the conduct'of that Expedition. That de believe that there now existed no necessity for the Bill ; but that parture was perhaps in no one instance imputable as on the contrary it might be productive of great inconvenience I blame to the Commanders of the Expedition :—it and loss to a very large and useful description of the community. i grew out of necessity—a necessity imposed by the He should,. therefore, endeavour to lim i t the duration of the I Bill, by moving that it should expire on the 31st of May next; ; elements—by the winds and waves, which no human instead of the .115 C of December. ! foresight could provide against—which no human After a few words from Lord BAT qußsr, the House divided I power could controul. These unforeseen and uncon ( a •lie a nenchnent,—Contents 18—Non Contents 92.—Majority 1 troulable obstacles compelled a departure from the ; g tinst the Amendment 4 Strangers were not irnmediately readmi tted after this division ; orginal plan of the enterprize , and that de p arture in fer another division afterwards took 1 lace on the motion, that volved its miscarriage. There was on no side any the pill be now reptirted to the 111;use without any amendment, wilful neglect or want of cordial co-operation. The when the Numbers were—Contents 2j—Non-Contents 19. two services vied with each other in activity and zeal. Majority 4. The Bill was then relorted, and ordered to be read a third . But impediments arose which rendered e ver y effo r t time on Tuesday near, when it was agreed that Counsel should ' unavailing the great and ultimate objects of the Lx be heard against the Bill. pedition. Here too would be found the difference be wisecoenex FAPERITION• tween the present case and that of the Convention of The Marquis of L ANSDOWNE then moved the Order of the , Cintra. Here the two services, the Navy and the Day for proceeding to the mction of which he had given notice, 1 respecting the Author or Authors o f the Answer which his Ma- i Army were to co-operate in the execution of the p l an. jesty had been advised to return to the Address of the City of . There the Army only was concerned. It was quite London, praying that an Inquiry might he instituted into the I unusual, he believed wholly unprecedented, for a Causes of the failure of that Expedition. But he wished that be- Military inquiry to be instituted into a conjoined ser ene he entered on the subject, Lord Chatham's narrative respect- vi • ce. Up to the time when the Answer was given to ing the failure of that Expedition be mad' The Clark having accordingly read the narrative, the Address of the City of London , n o char g e had The Noble Marquis began his comments upon it, been made on any side to make an inquiry ; or on in erder to prove that on the face of that document, which to hinge any sort of inAn sw vestigation. On The this drawn up by one of his Maj e s t y' s Ministers, b y the ground the propriety of that cr rested. very Ccnimander in Chief of that Expedition, there case was quite otherwise, as he had already stated, leas abundant reason for the institution of a M ilitar y with re g ard to the Convention of Cintra. The blame Inquiry. Were his Majesty's Ministers prepared to (whatever of blame was imputed) must rest with the say that Lord Chatham never made any communica- service engaged in it. He could net therefore com tion te them as the subject matter of that narrative i prebend the justice of all the strictures which the No- Did Lord Chatham, himself one of the advisers and ble Marquis had made on the conduct ot his Ma framers of the Expedition, conceal horn his col- jesty's Government. As to advising the Answer leagues the causes which, whether arising from ten- which his Majesty had made to the City of London's commutable occurrences, or from wilful neglect, bad I Address, he had confessed that Ministers were re defeated the accomplishment of the objects of the Ex- 1 sponsible; and from that responsibility they would ptdition ? If they do say so, what a new and me- not be found to shrink. lanehely proof is given to the ir Lordshi p s and to the Lord ROSSLYN went into a minute examination country of the distrust, the jealousy, and the want of of the dispatches which had been sent home at diffe harmony, which so shamefully prevails among the rent periods of the Expedition by the Naval and Mili a lvisers of the Crown. Can the affairs of the coun- tart' Commanders ; and from a full view of them he try prosper in the hands of men between whom there did not think it could he justly inferred that it was is no c onfidence or cordiality ? Among whom there ever the intention of Lord Chatham to cast any im. exists no common tie of feeling, no common system putation whatsoever on the conduct of Sir R.Strachan. of action. Is any other explanation necessary of all There was some variation in the papers now on the the difficulties we are involved in, of all the disasters table from these dispatches, particularly that of the and disgraces we have endured ?—The Earl of Chat- llth August, and he wished to know from whence ham enumerates in his narrative the various delays the alteration proceeded. and omissions on the part of the Naval Commanders Lord MULG RAVE said across the table, that of the Expedition, to veltfch he imputes the miscar- what alteration appeared in the papers on the table aiage of the Expedition. He came forward with these was in consequence of a conversation which he bad serious charges against a principal branch of the ar- with Sir R. Strachan since his return from Walche enament, and vet it has been said there was no cause ren ; in which conversation was explained what he or room for inquiry. A foul blot is attempted to be did not at first perfectly understand in the dispatch. cast on the character and conduct of that service to Lord ROSSLYN, in continuation, observed, that which the -ountry owes so much of its glory, and to the same opportunity of explanation should have been wheel it !nest chiefly look for its protection and se- afforded to Lord Chatham, by which what appeared euritv. if such a charge were therefore well founded, to reflect on 'that Noble Lord, in the dispatch of the how darkened would be our horizon—how gloomy 11th August, might have been removed. On the the views of our present and future situation !—Their same ground he had to object to the dispatches of th e Lordships have observe d the number and the nature 22d and 27th August: part of those dispatches had of the C.IIISCS to Ivhich Lord Chatham has ascribed the been concealed ; one of them was a letter which Sir feiiere ef the Expedition ; yet his colleagues advise R. Strachan didaiot intend should be published ; but his Majesty to tell the first Corporation in the country, when it was publishes!, nothing should have been that he seesllo cause for instituting a Military Inquiry. withheld that could have explained the conduct of Here the Noble Marquis read and commented upon Lord C hatham, or the circumst stances that fideetthat influenced the Answer of his Maje st y to the Address of the City and guided that conduct. e was of Lendcn, and asked who of his Ministers could , there was no wish or intention on the part of Lord have dared to advise his Majesty to make such an i Chatham to reflect on the conduct of Sir R.Strachan ; ansv - er, when he or they mus t have known, that such I as little was there on the part of that gallant Admi eerieus grounds of inquire had been furnished by one i ral to impute blame to the conduct of that Noble of theironn colleagues ? lut fully tokaowthe true clot- ! Lord. Neither could he bring himself to believe that !.toter of those Ministers, to whom in this crisis of its i any ill will or dissatisfaction had been excited between fate the affairs of this nation are now unfortunately ! the two services. Goo forbid there should. There entrusted, let their Lordships but recollect the an-1 was much no doubt to be lamented in the circum swer which these men advised his Majesty to make to j stances and failure of the Expedition to the Scheldt. another Address of the same City of London, on an ! Never could he sufficiently lament the number of 1 occasion of a nature some what similar. The dis- ! brave men who had unavailingly fallen victims to graceful Convention of Chem must still be green in 1 disease in that unfortunate service—but these calami the memory of their Lordships. What was the corn- ties would be nothing in his mind compared with the Flexion of the Answer to the Address of the City of misfortune of any ill blood being engendered between London, for an inquiry in to the causes of that shame- the Army and the Navy—but his mind was happily iul transaction ? Was all inquiry refused ? On the free from such an apprehension. The good sense, the contrary, was not the City of London rebuked— spirit, the honour, the patriotism which characterised Majesty's hear) —for insinuating even a doubt of his both services, were an eternal pledge of their mutual Majesty's disposition and determination to cause an esteem and respect for each other. Upon the whole, inquiry to be instituted into that eventean event which he could not but think the Earl of Chatham was se ;in the language of his Majesty's Answer, had disap- verely used. From the beginning his reputation was pointed the hopes and expectations of the country ? assailed on all sides. He was the object of the daily And was not the Expedition to \Valclteren of much attacks of all the public prints, which seemed to vie larger size, of much weightier importance ? and has with each other in disparaging his conduct in the eyes its failure less disappointed the hopes and expectations of the country. Even those prints and newspapers of the country ? In the former case there was an ala- which on every occasion seem so anxious to panegy- crity at inquiry, where the same grounds were not rize and blazon the conduct of Ministers, were among adduced for it : in the present instance, there was to the foremost to animadvert on Lord Chatham, and be no inquiry, although the strongest call and rea- bold him up to public censure and obloquy. In sons exist for its institution. lint he would leave it thus speaking of Lord Chatham, he wished it to be to Ministers to reconcile these jarring contradictions. understood'to be speaking from himself alone. He He waeld only call upon their Lordships not to allow was in no habits of intimacy with that Noble Earl ; them to affix to his Majesty's name the stigma of indeed, previous to that Expedition, he had scarcely such el tying inconsistencies. Let them belong to the any acquaintance with him. .He must therefore be reel authors of them. Let them be brought borne to j understood in any thing he had said concerning the those who could have p laced his Ma j e : ey in so awk- 1 whole of these transactions, to be spoken solely from ward a point of view. This was the aim and object : his own opinion, and not to be imagined to advance of the noolon he had to othmit to their Lordships, . a word fat m any previous conference with that Noble and he should not detain the House longer than while : Person on the subject of the Expedition. He would lie moved en humble Address to his Majesty, praying again repeat his conviction that no charge was ever his Majesty would be graciously pleased to inform that , intended by one service against the other, and that House who is it that advised his Mejesty to say, in consequently he could not conceive that any ill-will his Answer to the Address of the City of London, : bad been excited betweee them. that awn wore no grounds for inquiry into the con--i Lord HOLLAND observed, that the question be duct of the Commander of the Expedition to the fore them must be considered with a reference to two Scheldt. distinct documents—the public Dispatches from the The Earl of LIVERPOOL spoke in reply.—He Commanders of the Expedition, and the private Nar felt no hesitation in a ffording the Noble Marquis that rotive presented by Lord Chatham to his Majesty. ieformation which it seemed to be the object of his The answer which his Majesty had been advised to motion to obtain. If the Noble Matquis then desired give to the Address of the City of London involved to he i n formed who had advised his Majesty to return in it this dilemma : either that his Majesty's Ministers the Answer in question to the Address of the City of had deceived his Majesty, or that they had themselves - London, he would readily tell - him, that it was his been deceived by one of their own colleagues. Either Majesty's Ministers—that all his Majesty's Ministers, they had not been informed by their colleague that with the exec ptionof the Noble Lord.(Chatham) were he was dissatisfied with the conduct of the naval part perfectly ago ed in the propriety of that Answer, and of the expedition ; or, having received from him that that they all concurred in advising his Majesty to re- information, they had withheld it from his Majesty; tarn that Answer. Vrom whatever degree of respon- for it was impose ible to =cave, that had his Majesty PARLIAMENTARY PROCE.EBINGS. HOUSE OF LORDS, MARCH t. Several Private Bills were brought up from the Commons and read a first time. .. . known the imputations which were astsserh mit brate, - froth the adve rse winds end unfavourable v• • i Commander in Chief of the Land Forces in the Ex- ' causes over which it was impossible to maintai n n:c 7 ;: pedition on his associate Commander or the Navy, he controul. He declared the anxiety which he aleiv - , Would have told the City of London that he did not felt to maintain the character of the gallant 1 off: : think any Inquiry into. the general conduct of that in that de p artme n t of the service ov er which he . ' l ' .'l '., Expedition to be at all necessary. If it should tu rn the honour to p reside, and he confessed tlenthe il'a,- out that his Majesty's Ministers had not enjoyed the rative of Lord Chatham (the presentation of leh e e confidence of their eolleagtle• he would say, that to his Majesty was certainly an irregular proceed: n o were it possible for him to entertain COMpa , sion fix had created to him a personal inconvenience, hy . ' n - ,.' individuals whose conduct demanded indignation re. ling hini on his slefence to the brave and distil ' ige : ;,:e c ' i ther than pity, he should feel it for his Majesty's officer who had the command of th e naval biar •'., r Ministers, degraded as they would be by such an the Expedition, and by putting him on his defc:• ( ae .. (' avowal. It would then appear that the existence of eliat House. Not conceiving, however, tha t the i• le t ' 3 that secret influence, that unconstitutional in fl uence Mar q uis had ur g ed an y j ust g rounds for his ni . ... c io °, ;,-, which had so frequently been asserted, and as fre. he 'should give it his decided negative. quently denied, was proved beyond the possibility of The Earl of DARNLEY declared he could nt•v doubt. . with indignation, sorrow, and disgust ; and 0- ' '' t speak of the disgraceful Expedition to the Scheidt I ••- The Earl of WESTMORELAND declared that .ouel his Majesty's present Ministers were determined that nothing short of the removal of the present 1 1 / 4 i:: never to shrink from their•duty by an endeavour to nisters could rescue the country from disgrace an remove the responsibility which ought to rest on them disaster, or save it from eventual destruction. upon the shoulders of any other' Individuals. The i Lord GRENVILLE was glad to hear the able ci ,. .: fence made by the Noble Lore (Mulgrave) 'in 1 ' .•• present question lay in a very narrow compass. As 1 a. iiir! had been truly stated by the Noble Baron who had I of that gallant Admiral Sir Richard Strachan, uposi General. Certainly in that defence the Nob' I, ''' ' just spoken, it must be determined upon a considera. whom so much blame had been cast by the N„ , .... possibly entert-ii'ii Lion of the documents on the table. But what were acted but rightly ; and indeed it would have h le L ot ; ( those documents ? The public dispatches alone, most with this Nam • i i: unquestionably. On - an examination of those dis- idmidp,osnsoitblteofboer anxious o rlur tha fi t li: i n le g h szh : .i a r s a it n u d at i i l o p n st l l l i s i; a :et patches, he defied any man to adduce a single in- I character of the navy should escape unjust impu.;.. stance of the necessity of an Inquiry into the conduct 1 of either the Military or Naval Commander of the tion. No man, he believed, could Expedition ; and he could not conceive, therefore, 1 any doubt upon the subject, that, communicated to him, it was not how it was possible to advise his Majesty to give any teller answer to the Address of the City of London necessary to do itti some inquiry, in order to ascertain whether or ' not the ' than that which had actually been given. With charges of shame imputed to the gallant Admiral and respect to the Narrative that had been presented to the Navy were well founded ? In this opinion the his Majesty by Lord Chatham, he by no means al - Noble Lord seemed to concur, in direct oppositioa to the Noble Secretary of State. Sure he was, that lowed that it deserved the reprobation which had been I bestowed upon it. It must be recollected, that trn it would be quite impossible for the Noble S ecretai 1 , this subject the interests of the Noble Earl and those of State to recommend his Majesty to give the an of his colleagues might be at variance. That which ; steer he did to the City of London, if he had been might exculpate him might inculpate them, as that `aware of the contents of the Noble General's na:ra. which might inculpate them might inculpate him.— 1 t.ve. He blamed Ministers for having determine A Noble Earl had on a former occasion very corn- . ...i against inquiry before they were acquainted with Lb. ? . passionately expressed his apprehension that the pre. real merits of the case; and as Lord Chatham h.:l seat Administration did not possess the confidence off thought proper to accuse the gallant Admiral in i•i s the Crown. He begged to relieve the Noble Lord narrative, the latter ought at least to have been cate.l gg from such painful anxiety, by assuring him that they neon to give in a narrative of his proceedings a l so .— were themselves perfectly at ease on that scare. A s I His Lordship then adverted to some of the &un to the Inquiry into the Expedition itself, his Majesfy's st inces of the Expedition, and observed, that ii blame attached not to the Officers, the responsibility niue Ministers felt the utmost confidence that its result would be in the highest degree satisfactory. He was of course lay at the door of the Ministers. Leavine convinced, that so far would Ministers be from being this part of the subject, there remained one of sari proved not to have done their duty on this occasion, , greater importance to the country, in a constitutions.' point of view, than any that had yet been considered. that had they. not availed themselves of the great r e- sources of the country to engage in an enterprise of i He alluded to the illegal and unconstitutional c.alduct • of Lord Chatham in poisoning the Royal ear axaine the magnitude and importance of the E x p edition to the Scheldt, they might justly have been characterised ' those who were conjointly employed with him in trsc as fit and hereditary successors to all the torpor and public rvice. This was a conduct he execrated, as imbecility of their predecessors in o ffi ce. subversive of the best attributes of the Constitutor.— Earl GREY expressed his astonishment that the as tending to introduce a system of double Gevme Noble Earl should anticipate any satisfaction from , ment in the country, by wikir one set of men m a le the result of an inquiry into an Expedition so corn- ;be put forward as the ostensible Ministers of t h e pletely disgraceful, so extensively calamitous as the 1 King, whilst another set really possesseo the e i al il_ Expedition to the Scheldt, an Expedition by which deuce of the Throve, were in possession o f the Roy a l the national honour had been degraded , and which ear, and in fact were greater than the Throne its •:t. had converted almost every house in the Country His Lordship concluded by expressing a Ntish to 11.. into " a h ouse o f m ourning." The Noble Earl sonic official communication how it happened that (Liverpool) had declared that the Expedition had the King had been advised to give an answer t o the railed in consequence of a departure from the original City of London d:rectly min ary to tleat he m a st Iplan. Why then advise his Majesty to tell the City have given, hid the existence of the pales now befoe of London that no inquiry was necessary when, if i the Home been known to his advisers. there ever be a ground for an inquiry into the con.'l The question was then put, when a division took duct of any enterprise, a departure from the original place, and the numbers stood thus : plan upon which the enterprise was undertaken must Contents, 41—Proxies, 49—Total, CO Non-Contents. 70—Proxies. 66—Tiitzl, l:;;; be that ground ? The Noble Earl had then stated majority kninst the muzion, —4lA(Lourad. the difficulty of instituting an inquiry ia a case in . which the military and naval services were combined 1 —and in which different Courts must necessarily be re - sorted to. • To this objection he could allow no vali dity whatever. If on the. face of the original dis patches the utmost culpability had been apparent, he would ask the Noble Earl whether an inquiry would not have been imperiously demanded, notwithstand ing its having been a joint service ?—" Bat," said the Noble Earl, 6' the dispatches themselves did not con tain any thing to warrant an inqUiry." The Noble Earl had, however, very dexterously omitted to no tice the bearing of the narrative of the Earl of Cha tham on the subject ; a bearing, the force of which bad been ably illustrated by his Noble Friend near him, that he could not repeat his arguments to the House. Lord MULGRAVE entered into a defence of the conduct of Sir Richard Strachan, which he NAVAL cower; MARTIAL. considered as wholly free from the slightest possibi- Lord COCHR EAN ___ moved, that the copy cl the oath adr.i si b erca . to t o the evidence dd before eouris Martial, now on the tatil:, lily of imputation. He had been induced to give the advice which he had given to his Majesty on the sub - ' 'isli t e n' sJlTlC Noble e Lord also moved, that copies of the oatil ject of the answer to the Address of tilt: City of Lon. I now administered to the Members of Naval Coorts Martial, T .) don by the conviction, a conviction impressed on his I t h e Judge Advocate, and to the witnesses, be printed. mind by a most attentive perusal of the dispatches, ( T . he n Si' f F. t A .l K e I4l i n i bs l erw i d, there was somethin g ii ni:iLvylluitritsst!;ice, and which nothing had since occurred to alter, that I motion r o the pritnirof e itiy . r panor t alr ' e a r s . e the no blame was imputable to either of the Connnan- I d o y ot r ii i s ,, ii t nw m a 1 the oaths now alluded to by the Noble Lord were a;reaily r re. ders for the result of the Expedition. He declared 1 ted in lile Statute 13'1'51 I stove for their being read, or to quote from : hem ; but it . , :hey not only that he had never seen or heard of Lord already it was rot usual to move for their being it- Chatham's narrative until February 21, but that he .;e ri l printed, d. had never conceived the possibility of the existence 1 and the Noble Lord was at lib:rt y to Lord COCHRANE stated, that it was iosperailve up; a''• se of such a document. He would admit, that had he I win contended that such documents ttere inserted in t: , e h seen the narrative before the Address of the City of I Parliament, to point nut the part of the Statues e London was presented, he might have advised his ; is . . 1. 1 h a e te c n H Majesty to give so far a different answer, as to de- alluded t w A as N . CF:LLOR of the EXCHEQUER 4, ! , if I N Ogg'''. to by the Nob'e Lord were those enacted in the iion:oee Clare that 'the result of the Expedition was in a state : code of naval laws amongst the statutes, it would be ne-e' ~ . _r. of inquiry ; for although he conceived that in the ori- I tor liim to name the volumes and folios in which they %serer.' 0' ginal dispatches would be found a complete answer to , found. !•tx;;'' 1 the imputations (for they did not amount to char ) I 114 Mr. CROKER said, the oaths were certairly i n the . ges , K.__. I t was not po,..ibie, he conceived, that the Nehle 1• i , . I contained in the narrative, yet he thought it would should lie unacquainted with them. Copies of them wers.io .• t -- have been but justice to the gallant Admiral to re quire from him a counter statement. It was this I,• At ticks of war, real to every ship s comprny, and WO : ? .. i . , 1 hands of all the Captairs of the navy ; they were ins-eriei,.l nt: sense of justice to Sir R. Strachan which had induced ' • am:. found in the Act of eid of George 11. chap. 5:4 sea. 16. It! him immediately on his having been made a:xi:tainted ' have received a coy fir his ' guidance. i Noble I.otd, like every other Captain in the naval servni., with the existence of Lord Chatham's narrative (even : Lord COC before -he had himself read it) to apprise Sir R. not the same "Thew in the Statut e Book. Strachan of the circumstance, although the rapidity : lawfull y \ ; lrC k new of no other oaths that odd :'c HRANE saidi that the oaths now administered with which the narrative was moved for, and pro- : that none other were administered, unlei4 the Noble I .c , rd ...':: diced in the House of Commons, would not permit . l ada ° n K i: } : . o ß ter s 7i . d td : and cite the Hoto-e was bound to prestv": lay before them some proof or Parliamentary g round to w artia him to send a copy of it to the gallant Admiral. Ad- a contrary opinion. ARVEY believed the oaths new admi o lstertsl were r i verting to Sir Richard Strachan's, letter of the '27th i 114 r. 11 die sunse as prescribed in the statute Bock; some new regmi'lli'ser August, he declared that in his opinion it by no had since taken pace on the salijeet. i As o means bore the character of accusation of the milie Lary department of the expedition with which it had • put and negatived without a division. After some further convessation, Lord Cochrane s moti INNKEEPERS' mi,orrAicer. been charged. It simply declared the readiness of the navy to proceed; at the same time allowing that the Innke* and Publicans in the county of Kent upon their . Sir EDWARD KNATCHBULL presented a Petition f P i t the question 'of procedure was purely a military ene. subject, be said, with many other Petitions now tying 09:1 He would repeat what he had said on the first day table ; praying for an additional allowance for the maintenan 01, of the Session, that in his opinion the want of succehs moo at win. had said, upon a recent occasion, that there .we WAS not attributable to any one. It chiefly arose ' - - sew regulations on dsla subject in the coooteMpfarion 0 9 0 / 47 soldiers occasionally quartered upon them. The Nob Secrete. HOUSE OF COMMONS, MARCH 2. Sir ROBERT PEELE reported from the Select Committee upon the Glasgow election petition, that the Sitting Metoh 7, Alexander I luuston, Esq. was duly elected; but that the •en of the petitioner was ne•h •st frivolous mir e.natious. A new writ was ordered for the election of a burgess for N,w Woodstock, in the room of the lion. Wm Eden. decea•ed• Sir THOMAS TURTON obtained le:tve to hring to a If im pertuit the Managers of tae Royal Circus Thev.tre, in St. Georzes Fields, to exhibit certain dramatic perfornlatict 1. SI WILLIAM CURTIS obtained leave to bring in a Bill fcr erecri:t a new Stock of Funds Market. Mr. GRATTAN presented a petition from the prisoner: c )r -in debt for Ireland, which was laid on the tatie. 1 The second rta.ling of the Banking Embe7z•e:nmt eta; poqp..ned from Nfooday till Thurvtlay l on the motion of The Forign Liven Export Ifill went through a Committee. The Muitly Biil was read a second time, and committed fee Monday. of their loacter 4 fate tt entr us swer v 2 nothe occasi grace! the m ilex J,ond , ful tri COll tr: ilrar, aje! ingu . n : in the roinu And large; its till of the crity addu be nc snnts , to 11i rite v thcm such real thus( ware of tt and be n his Hot his. that duc St.:l), . 1 felt ink moi the • 1,0: Ma wit Per th,t tar